UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D. C.WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
Commission file number 1-9924
Citigroup Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | 52-1568099 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
399 Park Avenue, New York, (Address of principal executive offices) | 10043 (Zip | |
(212) 559-1000 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) |
(212) 559-1000(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:
Large accelerated filer ý | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No ý
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:
Common stock outstanding as of June 30, 2009: 5,507,716,974July 31, 2010: 28,973,528,780
Available on the Webweb at www.citigroup.com
SECOND QUARTER OF 2009—2010—FORM 10-Q
| 3 | |||||||||
| 4 | |||||||||
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | 5 | |||||||||
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY | 5 | |||||||||
Overview of Results | 5 | |||||||||
SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
SEGMENT, BUSINESS AND | ||||||||||
Citigroup Income (Loss) | ||||||||||
Citigroup Revenues | ||||||||||
CITICORP | ||||||||||
Regional Consumer Banking | ||||||||||
North America Regional Consumer Banking | ||||||||||
EMEA Regional Consumer Banking | ||||||||||
Latin America Regional Consumer Banking | ||||||||||
Asia Regional Consumer Banking | ||||||||||
Institutional Clients Group | ||||||||||
Securities and Banking | ||||||||||
Transaction Services | ||||||||||
CITI HOLDINGS | ||||||||||
Brokerage and Asset Management | ||||||||||
Local Consumer Lending | ||||||||||
Special Asset Pool | ||||||||||
CORPORATE/OTHER | 33 | |||||||||
| 34 | |||||||||
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY | 35 | |||||||||
Capital Resources | 35 | |||||||||
Funding and Liquidity | 40 | |||||||||
OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS | 43 | |||||||||
MANAGING GLOBAL RISK | ||||||||||
Credit Risk | 44 | |||||||||
Loan and Credit Overview | 44 | |||||||||
Loans Outstanding | 45 | |||||||||
Details of Credit Loss Experience | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Average Balances and Interest Rates—Assets | ||||||||||
Average Balances and Interest Rates—Liabilities and Equity, and Net Interest Revenue | ||||||||||
Analysis of Changes in Interest Revenue | ||||||||||
Analysis of Changes in Interest Expense and Net Interest Revenue | ||||||||||
Cross-Border Risk | 84 | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
RECLASSIFICATION OF HELD-TO-MATURITY (HTM) SECURITIES TO AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE (AFS) | 88 | |||||||||
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS | 88 | |||||||||
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | ||||||||||
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS | ||||||||||
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES | ||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | ||||||||||
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | ||||||||||
OTHER INFORMATION | ||||||||||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings | ||||||||||
Item 1A. Risk Factors | ||||||||||
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Item 6. Exhibits | ||||||||||
Signatures | ||||||||||
Exhibit Index |
Introduction
Citigroup's history dates back to the founding of Citibank in 1812. Citigroup's original corporate predecessor was incorporated in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware. Following a series of transactions over a number of years, Citigroup Inc. (Citigroupwas formed in 1998 upon the merger of Citicorp and together with its subsidiaries, the Company, Citi or Citigroup)Travelers Group Inc.
Citigroup is a global diversified financial services holding company whose businesses provide consumers, corporations, governments and institutions with a broad range of financial services to consumerproducts and corporate customers. Citigroupservices. Citi has more thanapproximately 200 million customer accounts and does business in more than 100 countries.160 countries and jurisidictions.
Citigroup was incorporated in 1988 under the lawscurrently operates, for management reporting purposes, via two primary business segments: Citicorp, consisting of ourRegional Consumer Banking businesses andInstitutional Clients Group; and Citi Holdings, consisting of ourBrokerage and Asset Management andLocal Consumer Lending businesses, and aSpecial Asset Pool. There is also a third segment,Corporate/Other. For a further description of the State of Delaware.
The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 registered with, and subject to examination by, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB). Citibank, N.A. is a U.S. national bank subject to supervision and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)business segments and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Someproducts and services they provide, see "Citigroup Segments" below, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Note 3 to the Company's other subsidiaries are also subjectConsolidated Financial Statements.
Throughout this report, "Citigroup" and "Citi" refer to supervisionCitigroup Inc. and examination by their respective federal and state authorities.its consolidated subsidiaries.
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K), Citigroup's updated 2009 historical financial statements and notes filed on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 25, 2010 and Citigroup's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. Additional financial, statistical, and business-related information, as well as business and segment trends, are included in a Financial Supplement that was filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on July 17, 2009.
The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 399 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10043, telephone number 212 559 1000.2010. Additional information about Citigroup is available on the Company's webcompany's Web site atwww.citigroup.com. Citigroup's recent annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, as well as the Company'sits other filings with the SEC are available free of charge through the Company's webcompany's Web site by clicking on the "Investors" page and selecting "All SEC Filings." The SEC webSEC's Web site also contains periodic and current reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding the CompanyCiti, atwww.sec.gov.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods' financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation.
Within this Form 10-Q, please refer to the tables of contents on pages 2 and 126 for page references to Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively.
Impact of Adoption of SFAS 166/167
Effective January 1, 2010, Citigroup adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 860, Transfers and Servicing, formerly SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166), and ASC 810, Consolidations, formerly SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167). Among other requirements, the adoption of these standards includes the requirement that Citi consolidate certain of its credit card securitization trusts and eliminate sale accounting for transfers of credit card receivables to those trusts. As a result, reported and managed-basis presentations are comparable for periods beginning January 1, 2010. For comparison purposes, prior period revenues, net credit losses, provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims and loans are presented on a managed basis in this Form 10-Q. Managed presentations were applicable only to Citi's North American branded and retail partner credit card operations inNorth America Regional Consumer Banking and Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending and any aggregations in which they are included. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Executive Summary," "Capital Resources and Liquidity" and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for an additional discussion of the adoption of SFAS 166/167 and its impact on Citigroup.
As described above, Citigroup is managed alongpursuant to the following segment and product lines:segments:
The following are the four regions in which Citigroup operates. The regional results are fully reflected in the segment results.results above.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SECOND QUARTER 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
During the second quarter of 2010, Citigroup continued its focus on (i) building and maintaining its financial strength, including maintaining its capital, liquidity and continued expense discipline, (ii) winding down Citi Holdings as quickly as practicable in an economically rational manner, and (iii) its core assets and businesses in Citicorp.
For the quarter, Citigroup reported net income of $2.7 billion, or $0.09 per diluted share. Second quarter 2010 results were down from the prior-year level of $4.3 billion, primarily due to the second quarter 2009 $6.7 billion after-tax ($11.1 billion pre-tax) gain on the sale of Smith Barney (SB) to the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture (MSSB JV). In addition, second quarter 2010 results reflected a difficult capital markets environment inSecurities and Banking and the impact of the U.K. bonus tax of approximately $400 million, partially offset by a stabilizing to improving credit environment and growth inAsia andLatin America Regional Consumer Banking andTransaction Services. Citicorp's net income was $3.8 billion; Citi Holdings had a net loss of $1.2 billion.
Revenues of $22.1 billion decreased 33% from comparable year-ago levels primarily due to the 2009 gain on sale of SB.Brokerage and Asset Management, which reflected the absence of SB revenues in the current quarter (approximately $0.9 billion in the second quarter of 2009),Local Consumer Lending andSecurities and Banking also contributed to the decline in comparable revenues. Other core businesses showed continued strength, includingRegional Consumer Banking andTransaction Services with $8.0 billion and $2.5 billion in revenue, respectively.
Securities and Banking, which faced a challenging market environment during the second quarter of 2010, had revenues of $6.0 billion, a $0.7 billion decrease from the prior-year period. Lower fixed income and equity markets revenues reflected increasing investor uncertainty and volatility during the quarter, which reduced market-making opportunities. Fixed income markets revenues were $3.7 billion compared to $5.6 billion in the second quarter of 2009. Equity markets revenues were $652 million, compared to $1.1 billion in the prior-year quarter. Investment banking revenues declined 42% to $674 million, reflecting lower client market activities. Lending revenues were $522 million in the second quarter of 2010, compared with losses of $1.1 billion in the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to gains on credit default swap hedges, compared to losses in the prior-year quarter.
Regional Consumer Banking revenues were up $187 million from the prior-year quarter to $8.0 billion on a comparable basis, driven by growth in Asia and Latin America.
Transaction Services revenues were up from year-ago levels by 1%, to $2.5 billion, also driven by Asia and Latin America.
Local Consumer Lending revenues of $4.2 billion in the second quarter of 2010 were down 15% on a comparable basis from a year ago, driven by the addition of $347 million of mortgage repurchase reserves related to North America residential real estate, lower volumes, and the deconsolidation of Primerica, Inc. (Primerica) from Citigroup, which completed its initial public offering and other equity transactions during the quarter.
Revenues in theSpecial Asset Pool increased to $572 million in the second quarter of 2010, from negative $376 million in the prior year, largely driven by positive net revenue marks of $1.0 billion in the second quarter of 2010 versus $470 million in the same quarter of 2009. The growth in revenues was also driven by the absence of losses related to hedges of various asset positions recorded in the prior-year period.
Net interest revenue increased 9% from the second quarter of 2009, primarily driven by the impact from the adoption of SFAS 166/167. Sequentially, Citi's net interest margin of 3.15% decreased by 17 basis points from the first quarter of 2010 due to the continued de-risking of loan portfolios, the expansion of loss mitigation efforts and the Primerica divestiture.
Non-interest revenue decreased 53% from a year ago, primarily reflecting the gain on sale of SB in 2009.
Operating expenses decreased 1% from the year-ago quarter and were up 3% from the first quarter of 2010. The decline in expenses from the year-ago quarter reflected the decrease in Citi Holdings expenses, primarily related to the absence of SB (approximately $900 million in the second quarter of 2009), which more than offset the increase in Citicorp expenses resulting from continued investments in the Citicorp businesses and the U.K. bonus tax in the current quarter. The increase in expenses from the first quarter of 2010 primarily related to the U.K. bonus tax, as ongoing investments in Citicorp businesses were partially offset by a continued decline in Citi Holdings expenses. Citi's full-time employees were 259,000 at June 30, 2010, down 20,000 from June 30, 2009 and down 4,000 from March 31, 2010.
Net credit losses of $8.0 billion in the second quarter of 2010 were down 31% from year-ago levels on a comparable basis, and down 5% from the first quarter of 2010. Second quarter of 2010 net credit losses reflected improvement for the fourth consecutive quarter. Consumer net credit losses of $7.5 billion were down 23% on a comparable basis from last year and down 7% from the prior quarter. Corporate net credit losses of $472 million were down 73% from last year and up 30% from the prior quarter. The sequential increase in corporate net credit losses was principally due to the charge off of loans for which Citi had previously established specific FAS 114 reserves that were released during the second quarter upon recognition of the charge off.
Citi's total allowance for loan losses was $46.2 billion at June 30, 2010, or 6.7% of total loans. This was down from 6.8% of total loans at March 31, 2010. During the second quarter of 2010, Citi had a net release of $1.5 billion to its credit reserves and allowance for unfunded lending
commitments, compared to a net build of $4.0 billion in the second quarter of 2009 and a net release of $53 million in the first quarter of 2010. Approximately half of the net loan loss reserve release was related to consumer loans, and half related to corporate loans (principally specific reserves).
The total allowance for loan losses for consumer loans decreased to $39.6 billion at the end of the quarter, but increased as a percentage of total consumer loans to 7.87%, compared to 7.84% at the end of the first quarter of 2010. The decrease in the allowance was mainly due to a net release of $827 million and reductions that did not flow through the provision. The reductions originated from asset sales in the U.S. real estate lending portfolio and certain loan portfolios moving to held-for-sale. The net release was mainly driven by Retail Partner Cards in Citi Holdings, as well asLatin America andAsia Regional Consumer Banking in Citicorp. During the second quarter of 2010, early- and later-stage delinquencies improved across most of the consumer loan portfolios, driven by improvement in North America mortgages, both in first and second mortgages. The improvement in first mortgages was entirely driven by asset sales and loans moving from the trial period under the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to permanent modification. For total consumer loans, the 90 days or more consumer loan delinquency rate was 3.67% at June 30, 2010, compared to 4.01% at March 31, 2010 and 3.68% a year ago. The 30 to 89 days past due consumer loan delinquency rate was 3.06% at June 30, 2010, compared to 3.19% at March 31, 2010 and 3.41% a year ago. Consumer non-accrual loans totaled $13.8 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $15.6 billion at March 31, 2010 and $15.8 billion at June 30, 2009.
The total allowance for loan losses for funded corporate loans declined to $6.6 billion at June 30, 2010, or 3.59% of corporate loans, down from 3.90% in the first quarter of 2010. Corporate non-accrual loans were $11.0 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $12.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $12.5 billion a year ago. The decrease in non-accrual loans from the prior quarter was mainly due to loan sales, write-offs and paydowns, which were partially offset by increases due to the weakening of certain borrowers.
The effective tax rate on continuing operations for the second quarter of 2010 was 23%, reflecting taxable earnings in lower tax rate jurisdictions, as well as tax advantaged earnings.
Total deposits were $814 billion at June 30, 2010, down 2% from March 31, 2010 and up 1% from year-ago levels. Citi's structural liquidity (equity, long-term debt and deposits) as a percentage of assets was 71% at June 30, 2010, unchanged as compared with March 31, 2010 and compared with 71% at June 30, 2009.
Total assets decreased $65 billion from the end of the first quarter 2010 to $1,938 billion. Citi Holdings assets decreased $38 billion during the second quarter of 2010, driven by approximately $19 billion of asset sales and business dispositions (including $6 billion from the Primerica initial public offering and $4 billion from the liquidation of subprime CDOs), $15 billion of net run-off and pay-downs and $4 billion of net credit losses and net asset marks. In addition, as part of its continued focus on reducing the assets in Citi Holdings, Citi reclassified $11.4 billion in assets from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale at June 30, 2010. This reclassification was in response to recent changes to SFAS 133 that allowed a one-time movement of certain assets classified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale to the trading book as of July 1, 2010, and included $4.1 billion of auction rate securities that were in held-to-maturity. The remaining $7.3 billion consisted of securities in theSpecial Asset Pool for which prices have largely recovered and that Citi believes it should be able to sell over the short-to-medium term, rather than wait for them to mature or run-off. Citi Holdings total GAAP assets of $465 billion at June 30, 2010 represents 24% of Citi's total GAAP assets. Citi Holdings' risk-weighted assets were approximately $400 billion, or approximately 40% of Citi's risk-weighted assets, as of June 30, 2010.
Citi's exposure to the ABCP CDO super senior positions was also reduced to zero during the second quarter of 2010 (although theSpecial Asset Pool retains exposure to a very small amount of underlying collateral assets). All of the 17 ABCP CDO deals structured by Citi have been liquidated as of the end of the second quarter.
Citigroup'sTotal stockholders' equity increased by $3.4 billion during the second quarter of 2010 to $154.8 billion, primarily reflecting net income during the quarter, partially offset by a decline inAccumulated other comprehensive income largely from FX translation. Citigroup's total equity capital base and trust preferred securities were $175.0 billion at June 30, 2010. Citigroup maintained its "well-capitalized" position with a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of 11.99% at June 30, 2010, up from 11.28% at March 31, 2010.
Business Outlook
As was the case with the second quarter of 2010 results inSecurities and Banking, the global economic and capital markets environment are expected to continue to drive Citi's revenue levels in the third quarter. In addition, as previously disclosed, The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act) will continue to have a negative impact on U.S. credit card revenues. Citi continues to believe that, for the full year 2010, the negative net impact of the CARD Act on Citi-branded card revenues will be approximately $400 million to $600 million, including the impact of the Federal Reserve Board's recent adoption of final rules relating to penalty fee provisions. For Retail Partner Cards, Citi has increased its full year 2010 estimate of negative net revenue impact resulting from the CARD Act to approximately $150 million to $200 million, from $50 million to $150 million, given the new penalty fee provisions. In each of these portfolios, the vast majority of the 2010 net impact will occur in the second half of the year.
Net revenue marks in theSpecial Asset Pool, which have been positive for the last five quarters, will remain episodic, although Citi continued to de-risk this portfolio during the second quarter of 2010, as evidenced by the CDO liquidations discussed above.
Citi currently expects quarterly expenses to continue to be in the range of $11.5 billion to $12 billion for the remainder of 2010. As previously disclosed, Citicorp's expenses may continue to increase, reflecting ongoing investments in its core businesses, while Citi Holdings should continue to decline as assets are reduced.
Credit costs will remain a key driver of earnings performance for the remainder of 2010. Assuming that the
U.S. economy continues to recover and international recovery is sustained, Citi currently believes that consumer credit costs should continue to decline. Internationally, credit is expected to continue to improve, but at a moderating pace. In both North America cards portfolios, net credit losses are expected to improve modestly, but will likely remain elevated until U.S. employment levels improve significantly. In North America mortgages, net credit losses and delinquencies continued to improve during the second quarter of 2010, largely as the result of Citi's loss mitigation efforts, including sales of delinquent mortgages and the impact of loan modifications. Citi has observed, however, that, to date, the underlying credit quality of this portfolio has not been improving in the same manner as its cards portfolios. Mortgages are also particularly at risk to many external factors, such as unemployment trends, home prices, government modification programs and state foreclosure regulations. As a result, Citi expects to continue to pay particular attention to this portfolio and will continue its efforts to mitigate losses. Citigroup's consumer loan loss reserve balances will continue to reflect the losses embedded in the company's portfolios, given underlying credit trends and the impact of forbearance programs. Though credit trends in the corporate loan portfolio generally continued to improve, credit costs will continue to be episodic.
Looking forward, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was signed into law on July 21, 2010. The Act calls for significant structural reforms and new substantive regulation across the financial industry, including new consumer protections and increased scrutiny and regulation for any financial institution that could pose a systemic risk to market-wide financial stability. Many of the provisions of the Act will be subject to extensive rulemaking and interpretation, and a significant amount of uncertainty remains as to the ultimate impact of the Act on Citigroup. The Act will likely require Citigroup to eliminate, transform or change certain of its business activities and practices. The Financial Reform Act will also likely impose additional costs, some significant, on Citigroup, adversely affect its ability to pursue business opportunities it may otherwise consider engaging in, cause business disruptions and impact the value of the assets that Citigroup holds. In addition, the Act grants new regulatory authority to various U.S. federal regulators to impose heightened prudential standards on financial institutions. This authority, together with the continued implementation of new minimum capital standards for bank holding companies as adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and U.S. regulators, has created significant uncertainty with respect to the future capital requirements or capital composition for institutions such as Citigroup. Citi will continue to monitor these developments closely.
CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—Page 1
| Second Quarter | | Six Months Ended | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts | % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 12,829 | $ | 13,986 | (8 | )% | $ | 25,755 | $ | 27,074 | (5 | )% | |||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 17,140 | 3,552 | NM | 28,735 | 2,621 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 29,969 | $ | 17,538 | 71 | % | $ | 54,490 | $ | 29,695 | 83 | % | |||||||||
Operating expenses | 11,999 | 15,214 | (21 | ) | 23,684 | 30,591 | (23 | ) | |||||||||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | 12,676 | 7,100 | 79 | 22,983 | 12,952 | 77 | |||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes | $ | 5,294 | $ | (4,776 | ) | NM | $ | 7,823 | $ | (13,848 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | 907 | (2,447 | ) | NM | 1,742 | (6,333 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations | $ | 4,387 | $ | (2,329 | ) | NM | $ | 6,081 | $ | (7,515 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of taxes | (142 | ) | (94 | ) | (51 | )% | (259 | ) | (35 | ) | NM | ||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests | $ | 4,245 | $ | (2,423 | ) | NM | $ | 5,822 | $ | (7,550 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests | (34 | ) | 72 | NM | (50 | ) | 56 | NM | |||||||||||||
Citigroup's Net Income (Loss) | $ | 4,279 | $ | (2,495 | ) | NM | $ | 5,872 | $ | (7,606 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Less: | |||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividends—Basic | $ | (1,495 | ) | $ | (361 | ) | NM | $ | (2,716 | ) | $ | (444 | ) | NM | |||||||
Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance—Basic(1) | — | — | — | (1,285 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Preferred stock Series H discount accretion—Basic | (54 | ) | — | — | (107 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) available to common stockholders for Basic EPS | $ | 2,730 | $ | (2,856 | ) | NM | $ | 1,764 | $ | (8,050 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends | 270 | 270 | — | 540 | 336 | 61 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) available to common stockholders for Diluted EPS | $ | 3,000 | $ | (2,586 | ) | NM | $ | 2,304 | $ | (7,714 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Earnings per share | |||||||||||||||||||||
Basic(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 0.51 | $ | (0.53 | ) | NM | $ | 0.36 | $ | (1.56 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Net income (loss) | 0.49 | (0.55 | ) | NM | 0.31 | (1.57 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
Diluted(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 0.51 | $ | (0.53 | ) | NM | $ | 0.36 | $ | (1.56 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Net income (loss) | 0.49 | (0.55 | ) | NM | 0.31 | (1.57 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
| Second Quarter | | Six Months Ended | | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts | % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Total managed revenues(1) | $ | 22,071 | $ | 33,095 | (33 | )% | $ | 47,492 | $ | 60,068 | (21 | )% | ||||||||
Total managed net credit losses(1) | 7,962 | 11,470 | (31 | ) | 16,346 | 21,300 | (23 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 14,039 | $ | 12,829 | 9 | % | $ | 28,600 | $ | 25,755 | 11 | % | ||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 8,032 | 17,140 | (53 | ) | 18,892 | 28,735 | (34 | ) | ||||||||||||
Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 22,071 | $ | 29,969 | (26 | )% | $ | 47,492 | $ | 54,490 | (13 | )% | ||||||||
Operating expenses | 11,866 | 11,999 | (1 | ) | 23,384 | 23,684 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | 6,665 | 12,676 | (47 | ) | 15,283 | 22,983 | (34 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | $ | 3,540 | $ | 5,294 | (33 | )% | $ | 8,825 | $ | 7,823 | 13 | % | ||||||||
Income taxes (losses) | 812 | 907 | (10 | ) | 1,848 | 1,742 | 6 | |||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 2,728 | $ | 4,387 | (38 | )% | $ | 6,977 | $ | 6,081 | 15 | % | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes | (3 | ) | (142 | ) | 98 | 208 | (259 | ) | NM | |||||||||||
Net income (losses) before attribution of noncontrolling interests | $ | 2,725 | $ | 4,245 | (36 | )% | $ | 7,185 | $ | 5,822 | 23 | % | ||||||||
Net income (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 28 | (34 | ) | NM | 60 | (50 | ) | NM | ||||||||||||
Citigroup's net income | $ | 2,697 | $ | 4,279 | (37 | )% | $ | 7,125 | $ | 5,872 | 21 | % | ||||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividends—Basic | — | $ | 1,495 | (100 | )% | — | $ | 2,716 | (100 | )% | ||||||||||
Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance—Basic(2) | — | — | — | — | 1,285 | (100 | ) | |||||||||||||
Preferred stock Series H discount accretion—Basic | — | 54 | (100 | ) | — | 107 | (100 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) available to common stockholders | $ | 2,697 | $ | 2,730 | (1 | )% | $ | 7,125 | $ | 1,764 | NM | |||||||||
Dividends and earnings allocated to participating securities, net of forfeitures | 26 | 105 | (75 | ) | 57 | 69 | (17 | )% | ||||||||||||
Undistributed earnings (loss) for basic EPS | $ | 2,671 | $ | 2,625 | 2% | $ | 7,068 | $ | 1,695 | NM | ||||||||||
Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends | — | 270 | (100 | ) | — | 540 | (100 | )% | ||||||||||||
Undistributed earnings (loss) for diluted EPS | $ | 2,671 | $ | 2,895 | (8 | )% | $ | 7,068 | $ | 2,235 | NM | |||||||||
Earnings per share | ||||||||||||||||||||
Basic(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.51 | (82 | )% | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.36 | (33 | )% | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | 0.09 | 0.49 | (82 | ) | 0.25 | 0.31 | (19 | ) | ||||||||||||
Diluted(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.51 | (82 | )% | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.36 | (36 | )% | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | 0.09 | 0.49 | (82 | ) | 0.24 | 0.31 | (23 | ) | ||||||||||||
[Continued on the following page, including notes to table.]
SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—Page 2
| Second Quarter | | Six Months Ended | | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||
At June 30: | |||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,848,533 | $ | 2,100,385 | (12 | )% | |||||||||||||
Total deposits | 804,736 | 803,642 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 348,046 | 417,928 | (17 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary Trusts (included in Long-term debt) | 24,034 | 23,658 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
Common stockholders' equity | 78,001 | 108,981 | (28 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total stockholders' equity | $ | 152,302 | $ | 136,405 | 12 | ||||||||||||||
Direct staff(in thousands) | 279 | 363 | (23 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||
Return on common stockholders' equity(3) | 14.8 | % | (10.4 | )% | 4.9 | % | (14.5 | )% | |||||||||||
Tier 1 Common(4) | 2.75 | % | 4.43 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | 12.74 | % | 8.74 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total Capital | 16.62 | % | 12.29 | % | |||||||||||||||
Leverage(5) | 6.92 | % | 5.04 | % | |||||||||||||||
Common stockholders' equity to assets | 4.22 | % | 5.19 | % | |||||||||||||||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends | 1.40 | 0.62 | 1.23 | 0.52 | |||||||||||||||
| Second Quarter | | Six Months Ended | | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts | % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
At June 30: | |||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,937,656 | $ | 1,848,533 | 5 | % | |||||||||||||
Total deposits | 813,951 | 804,736 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 413,297 | 348,046 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||
Mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary Trusts (included in Long-term debt) | 20,218 | 24,196 | (16 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Common stockholders' equity | 154,494 | 78,001 | 98 | ||||||||||||||||
Total stockholders' equity | 154,806 | 152,302 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
Direct staff(in thousands) | 259 | 279 | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Ratios: | |||||||||||||||||||
Return on common stockholders' equity(3) | 7.0 | % | 14.8 | % | 9.5 | % | 4.9 | % | |||||||||||
Tier 1 Common(4) | 9.71 | % | 2.75 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital | 11.99 | 12.74 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Capital | 15.59 | 16.62 | |||||||||||||||||
Leverage(5) | 6.31 | 6.90 | |||||||||||||||||
Common stockholders' equity to assets | 7.97 | % | 4.22 | % | |||||||||||||||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends | 1.54 | 1.41 | 1.68 | 1.23 | |||||||||||||||
SEGMENT, BUSINESS AND PRODUCT—INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES
The following tables show the income (loss) and revenues for Citigroup on a segment, business and product view:
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from Continuing Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||
CITICORP | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regional Consumer Banking | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 62 | $ | 139 | (55 | )% | $ | 84 | $ | 496 | (83 | )% | |||||||||
EMEA | 50 | (110 | ) | NM | 77 | (143 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
Latin America | 491 | 116 | NM | 880 | 335 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Asia | 574 | 279 | NM | 1,150 | 527 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,177 | $ | 424 | NM | $ | 2,191 | $ | 1,215 | 80 | % | ||||||||||
Securities and Banking | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 839 | $ | (32 | ) | NM | $ | 2,263 | $ | 2,465 | (8 | )% | |||||||||
EMEA | 355 | 746 | (52 | )% | 1,387 | 2,917 | (52 | ) | |||||||||||||
Latin America | 197 | 527 | (63 | ) | 469 | 939 | (50 | ) | |||||||||||||
Asia | 294 | 597 | (51 | ) | 772 | 1,653 | (53 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,685 | $ | 1,838 | (8 | )% | $ | 4,891 | $ | 7,974 | (39 | )% | |||||||||
Transaction Services | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 166 | $ | 181 | (8 | )% | $ | 325 | $ | 319 | 2 | % | |||||||||
EMEA | 318 | 350 | (9 | ) | 624 | 676 | (8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Latin America | 153 | 150 | 2 | 310 | 310 | — | |||||||||||||||
Asia | 297 | 293 | 1 | 616 | 573 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 934 | $ | 974 | (4 | )% | $ | 1,875 | $ | 1,878 | — | ||||||||||
Institutional Clients Group | $ | 2,619 | $ | 2,812 | (7 | )% | $ | 6,766 | $ | 9,852 | (31 | )% | |||||||||
Total Citicorp | $ | 3,796 | $ | 3,236 | 17 | % | $ | 8,957 | $ | 11,067 | (19 | )% | |||||||||
CITI HOLDINGS | |||||||||||||||||||||
Brokerage and Asset Management | (88 | ) | $ | 6,775 | NM | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 6,809 | (100 | )% | |||||||||
Local Consumer Lending | $ | (1,230 | ) | (4,347 | ) | 72 | % | (3,068 | ) | (5,918 | ) | 48 | |||||||||
Special Asset Pool | 121 | (1,246 | ) | NM | 1,002 | (5,194 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
Total Citi Holdings | $ | (1,197 | ) | $ | 1,182 | NM | $ | (2,073 | ) | $ | (4,303 | ) | 52 | % | |||||||
Corporate/Other | $ | 129 | $ | (31 | ) | NM | $ | 93 | $ | (683 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 2,728 | $ | 4,387 | (38 | )% | $ | 6,977 | $ | 6,081 | 15 | % | |||||||||
Discontinued operations | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (142 | ) | 98 | % | $ | 208 | $ | (259 | ) | NM | |||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 28 | (34 | ) | NM | 60 | (50 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
Citigroup's net income | $ | 2,697 | $ | 4,279 | (37 | )% | $ | 7,125 | $ | 5,872 | 21 | % | |||||||||
NM Not meaningful
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
CITICORP | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regional Consumer Banking | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 3,693 | $ | 2,182 | 69 | % | $ | 7,494 | $ | 4,685 | 60 | % | |||||||||
EMEA | 376 | 394 | (5 | ) | 781 | 754 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
Latin America | 2,118 | 1,950 | 9 | 4,194 | 3,874 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
Asia | 1,845 | 1,675 | 10 | 3,645 | 3,241 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 8,032 | $ | 6,201 | 30 | % | $ | 16,114 | $ | 12,554 | 28 | % | |||||||||
Securities and Banking | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 2,627 | $ | 1,721 | 53 | % | $ | 6,180 | $ | 6,737 | (8 | )% | |||||||||
EMEA | 1,762 | 2,558 | (31 | ) | 4,277 | 6,780 | (37 | ) | |||||||||||||
Latin America | 558 | 1,049 | (47 | ) | 1,165 | 1,849 | (37 | ) | |||||||||||||
Asia | 1,008 | 1,373 | (27 | ) | 2,336 | 3,535 | (34 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 5,955 | $ | 6,701 | (11 | )% | $ | 13,958 | $ | 18,901 | (26 | )% | |||||||||
Transaction Services | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 636 | $ | 656 | (3 | )% | $ | 1,275 | $ | 1,245 | 2 | % | |||||||||
EMEA | 848 | 860 | (1 | ) | 1,681 | 1,704 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Latin America | 356 | 340 | 5 | 700 | 683 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Asia | 662 | 627 | 6 | 1,283 | 1,225 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,502 | $ | 2,483 | 1 | % | $ | 4,939 | $ | 4,857 | 2 | % | |||||||||
Institutional Clients Group | $ | 8,457 | $ | 9,184 | (8 | )% | $ | 18,897 | $ | 23,758 | (20 | )% | |||||||||
Total Citicorp | $ | 16,489 | $ | 15,385 | 7 | % | $ | 35,011 | $ | 36,312 | (4 | )% | |||||||||
CITI HOLDINGS | |||||||||||||||||||||
Brokerage and Asset Management | $ | 141 | $ | 12,220 | (99 | )% | $ | 481 | $ | 13,827 | (97 | )% | |||||||||
Local Consumer Lending | 4,206 | 3,481 | 21 | 8,876 | 9,502 | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Special Asset Pool | 572 | (376 | ) | NM | 2,112 | (4,910 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
Total Citi Holdings | $ | 4,919 | $ | 15,325 | (68 | )% | $ | 11,469 | $ | 18,419 | (38 | )% | |||||||||
Corporate/Other | $ | 663 | $ | (741 | ) | NM | $ | 1,012 | $ | (241 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Total net revenues | $ | 22,071 | $ | 29,969 | (26 | )% | $ | 47,492 | $ | 54,490 | (13 | )% | |||||||||
Impact of Credit Card Securitization Activity(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Citicorp | $ | — | $ | 1,644 | NM | $ | — | $ | 3,128 | NM | |||||||||||
Citi Holdings | — | 1,482 | NM | — | 2,450 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Total impact of credit card securitization activity | $ | — | $ | 3,126 | NM | $ | — | $ | 5,578 | NM | |||||||||||
Total Citigroup—managed net revenues(1) | $ | 22,071 | $ | 33,095 | (33 | )% | $ | 47,492 | $ | 60,068 | (21 | )% | |||||||||
NM Not meaningful
Certain reclassifications have been madeCiticorp is the company's global bank for consumers and businesses and represents Citi's core franchise. Citicorp is focused on providing best-in-class products and services to customers and leveraging Citigroup's unparalleled global network. Citicorp is physically present in approximately 100 countries, many for over 100 years, and offers services in over 160 countries and jurisdictions. Citi believes this global network provides a strong foundation for servicing the broad financial services needs of large multinational clients and for meeting the needs of retail, private banking and commercial customers around the world. Citigroup's global footprint provides coverage of the world's emerging economies, which Citi believes represents a strong area of growth. At June 30, 2010, Citicorp had approximately $1.2 trillion of assets and $719 billion of deposits, representing approximately 62% of Citi's total assets and approximately 88% of its deposits.
Citicorp consists of the following businesses:Regional Consumer Banking (which includes retail banking and Citi-branded cards in four regions—North America, EMEA, Latin America andAsia) andInstitutional Clients Group (which includesSecurities and Banking andTransaction Services).
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 9,742 | $ | 8,774 | 11 | % | $ | 19,612 | $ | 17,285 | 13 | % | |||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 6,747 | 6,611 | 2 | 15,399 | 19,027 | (19 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 16,489 | $ | 15,385 | 7 | % | $ | 35,011 | $ | 36,312 | (4 | )% | |||||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 2,965 | $ | 1,575 | 88 | % | $ | 6,107 | $ | 2,826 | NM | ||||||||||
Credit reserve build (release) | (639 | ) | 1,231 | NM | (999 | ) | 2,229 | NM | |||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | $ | 2,326 | $ | 2,806 | (17 | )% | $ | 5,108 | $ | 5,055 | 1 | % | |||||||||
Provision for benefits and claims | 27 | 42 | (36 | ) | 71 | 84 | (15 | ) | |||||||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments | (26 | ) | 83 | NM | (33 | ) | 115 | NM | |||||||||||||
Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 2,327 | $ | 2,931 | (21 | )% | $ | 5,146 | $ | 5,254 | (2 | )% | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 9,090 | $ | 8,068 | 13 | % | $ | 17,575 | $ | 15,467 | 14 | % | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 5,072 | $ | 4,386 | 16 | % | $ | 12,290 | $ | 15,591 | (21 | )% | |||||||||
Provisions for income taxes | 1,276 | 1,150 | 11 | 3,333 | 4,524 | (26 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 3,796 | $ | 3,236 | 17 | % | $ | 8,957 | $ | 11,067 | (19 | )% | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 20 | 3 | NM | 41 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Citicorp's net income | $ | 3,776 | $ | 3,233 | 17 | % | $ | 8,916 | $ | 11,067 | (19 | )% | |||||||||
Balance sheet data(in billions of dollars) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total EOP assets | $ | 1,211 | $ | 1,051 | 15 | % | |||||||||||||||
Average assets | 1,250 | 1,074 | 16 | $ | 1,242 | $ | 1,066 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||
Return on assets | 1.21 | % | 1.21 | % | 1.45 | % | 2.09 | % | |||||||||||||
Total EOP deposits | $ | 719 | $ | 706 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||
Total GAAP revenues | $ | 16,489 | $ | 15,385 | 7 | % | $ | 35,011 | $ | 36,312 | (4 | )% | |||||||||
Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1) | — | 1,644 | NM | — | 3,128 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Total managed revenues | $ | 16,489 | $ | 17,029 | (3 | )% | $ | 35,011 | $ | 39,440 | (11 | )% | |||||||||
GAAP net credit losses | $ | 2,965 | $ | 1,575 | 88 | % | $ | 6,107 | $ | 2,826 | NM | ||||||||||
Impact of credit card securitization activity(1) | — | 1,837 | NM | — | 3,328 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Total managed net credit losses | $ | 2,965 | $ | 3,412 | (13 | )% | $ | 6,107 | $ | 6,154 | (1 | )% | |||||||||
REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING
Regional Consumer Banking (RCB) consists of Citigroup's four regional consumer banking businesses that provide traditional banking services to conformretail customers.RCB also contains Citigroup's branded cards business and Citi's local commercial banking business.RCB is a globally diversified business with over 4,200 branches in 39 countries around the world. During the first quarter of 2010, 53% of totalRCB revenues were from outsideNorth America. Additionally, the majority of international revenues and loans were from emerging economies inAsia, Latin America, and Central and Eastern Europe. At June 30, 2010,RCB had $309 billion of assets and $291 billion of deposits.
| Second Quarter | % | Six Months | % | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | Change | 2010 | 2009 | Change | |||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 5,774 | $ | 4,140 | 39 | % | $ | 11,691 | $ | 7,982 | 46 | % | |||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 2,258 | 2,061 | 10 | 4,423 | 4,572 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 8,032 | $ | 6,201 | 30 | % | $ | 16,114 | $ | 12,554 | 28 | % | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 3,982 | $ | 3,703 | 8 | % | $ | 7,919 | $ | 7,207 | 10 | % | |||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 2,922 | $ | 1,406 | NM | $ | 5,962 | $ | 2,580 | NM | |||||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments | (4 | ) | — | — | (4 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
Credit reserve build (release) | (408 | ) | 619 | NM | (588 | ) | 1,305 | NM | |||||||||||||
Provisions for benefits and claims | 27 | 42 | (36 | )% | 71 | 84 | (15 | )% | |||||||||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 2,537 | $ | 2,067 | 23 | % | $ | 5,441 | $ | 3,969 | 37 | % | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 1,513 | $ | 431 | NM | $ | 2,754 | $ | 1,378 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
Income taxes | 336 | 7 | NM | 563 | 163 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 1,177 | $ | 424 | NM | $ | 2,191 | $ | 1,215 | 80 | % | ||||||||||
Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | (5 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,177 | $ | 424 | NM | $ | 2,196 | $ | 1,215 | 81 | % | ||||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 306 | $ | 239 | 28 | % | $ | 307 | $ | 234 | 31 | % | |||||||||
Return on assets | 1.54 | % | 0.71 | % | 1.44 | % | 1.05 | % | |||||||||||||
Average deposits(in billions of dollars) | 291 | 272 | 7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Managed net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans | 5.38 | % | 6.01 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Revenue by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 3,916 | $ | 3,789 | 3 | % | $ | 7,730 | $ | 7,326 | 6 | % | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 4,116 | 2,412 | 71 | 8,384 | �� | 5,228 | 60 | ||||||||||||||
Total GAAP revenues | $ | 8,032 | $ | 6,201 | 30 | % | $ | 16,114 | $ | 12,554 | 28 | % | |||||||||
Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1) | — | 1,644 | NM | — | 3,128 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Total managed revenues | $ | 8,032 | $ | 7,845 | 2 | % | $ | 16,114 | $ | 15,682 | 3 | % | |||||||||
Net credit losses by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 304 | $ | 428 | (29 | )% | $ | 593 | $ | 766 | (23 | )% | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 2,618 | 978 | NM | $ | 5,369 | $ | 1,814 | NM | |||||||||||||
Total GAAP net credit losses | $ | 2,922 | $ | 1,406 | NM | $ | 5,962 | $ | 2,580 | NM | |||||||||||
Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1) | — | 1,837 | NM | — | 3,328 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Total managed net credit losses | $ | 2,922 | $ | 3,243 | (10 | )% | $ | 5,962 | $ | 5,908 | 1 | % | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 884 | $ | 635 | (39 | )% | $ | 1,732 | $ | 1,285 | 35 | % | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 293 | (211 | ) | NM | 459 | (70 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,177 | $ | 424 | NM | $ | 2,191 | $ | 1,215 | 80 | % | ||||||||||
NORTH AMERICA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING
Certain statementsNorth America Regional Consumer Banking (NA RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses in this Form 10-Q, including, but not limitedthe U.S.NA RCB's approximately 1,000 retail bank branches and 13.3 million retail customer accounts are largely concentrated in the greater metropolitan areas of New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Miami, Washington, D.C., Boston, Philadelphia, and certain larger cities in Texas. At June 30, 2010,NA RCB had approximately $30.2 billion of retail banking and residential real estate loans and $144.7 billion of deposits. In addition,NA RCB had approximately 21.3 million Citi-branded credit card accounts, with $77.2 billion in outstanding card loan balances.
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 2,778 | $ | 1,330 | NM | $ | 5,732 | $ | 2,522 | NM | |||||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 915 | 852 | 7 | % | 1,762 | 2,163 | (19 | )% | |||||||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 3,693 | $ | 2,182 | 69 | % | $ | 7,494 | $ | 4,685 | 60 | % | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 1,499 | $ | 1,486 | 1 | % | $ | 3,110 | $ | 2,980 | 4 | % | |||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 2,126 | $ | 307 | NM | $ | 4,283 | $ | 564 | NM | |||||||||||
Credit reserve build (release) | (9 | ) | 149 | NM | (5 | ) | 402 | NM | |||||||||||||
Provisions for benefits and claims | 5 | 15 | (67 | )% | 13 | 28 | (54 | )% | |||||||||||||
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 2,122 | $ | 471 | NM | $ | 4,291 | $ | 994 | NM | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 72 | $ | 225 | (68 | )% | $ | 93 | $ | 711 | (87 | )% | |||||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | 10 | 86 | (88 | ) | 9 | 215 | (96 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 62 | $ | 139 | (55 | )% | $ | 84 | $ | 496 | (83 | )% | |||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 62 | $ | 139 | (55 | )% | $ | 84 | $ | 496 | (83 | )% | |||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 117 | $ | 74 | 58 | % | $ | 119 | $ | 73 | 63 | % | |||||||||
Average deposits(in billions of dollars) | 145.5 | 139.6 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Managed net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans(1) | 7.98 | % | 7.36 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Revenue by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 1,323 | $ | 1,376 | (4 | )% | $ | 2,603 | $ | 2,672 | (3 | )% | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 2,370 | 806 | NM | 4,891 | 2,013 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Total GAAP revenues | $ | 3,693 | $ | 2,182 | 69 | % | $ | 7,494 | $ | 4,685 | 60 | % | |||||||||
Net impact of credit card securitization activity(2) | — | 1,644 | NM | — | 3,128 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Total managed revenues | $ | 3,693 | $ | 3,826 | (3 | )% | $ | 7,494 | $ | 7,813 | (4 | )% | |||||||||
Net credit losses by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 79 | $ | 88 | (10 | )% | $ | 152 | $ | 144 | 6 | % | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 2,047 | 219 | NM | 4,131 | 420 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Total GAAP net credit losses | $ | 2,126 | $ | 307 | NM | $ | 4,283 | $ | 564 | NM | |||||||||||
Net impact of credit card securitization activity(2) | — | 1,837 | NM | — | 3,328 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Total managed net credit losses | $ | 2,126 | $ | 2,144 | (1 | )% | $ | 4,283 | $ | 3,892 | 10 | % | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 225 | $ | 242 | (7 | )% | $ | 409 | $ | 483 | (15 | )% | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | (163 | ) | (103 | ) | (58 | ) | (325 | ) | 13 | NM | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 62 | $ | 139 | (55 | )% | $ | 84 | $ | 496 | (83 | )% | |||||||||
2Q10 vs. 2Q09
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 69% primarily due to the consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 effective January 2010. On a managed basis,revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 3%, primarily reflecting the net impact of the Private Securities Litigation ReformCARD Act on branded cards revenues and lower volumes in cards and mortgages.
Net interest revenue was down 8% on a managed basis, driven by the net impact of 1995. These statements are basedthe CARD Act as well as lower volumes in cards, where average managed loans were down 7% from the prior-year quarter, and in retail banking, where average loans were down 12%.
Non-interest revenue increased 11% on management's current expectations and are subjecta managed basis primarily due to uncertainty and changesbetter servicing hedge results in circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from those includedmortgages, partially offset by lower fees in these statementscards, mainly due to a variety of factors including, but not limited15% decline in open accounts from the prior-year quarter.
Operating expenses increased 1% from the prior-year quarter primarily due to those described in Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K under "Risk Factors."higher marketing costs.
Within this Form 10-Q, please referProvisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $1.7 billion primarily due to the indices on pages 2 and 73 for page referencesconsolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the Management's Discussionadoption of
SFAS 166/167. On a comparable basis,Provisions for loan losses and Analysis sectionfor benefits and Notesclaims decreased $186 million, or 8%, primarily due to the absence of a $149 million loan loss reserve build in the prior-year quarter and lower net credit losses. Net credit losses were down $9 million in both cards and retail banking. The branded cards managed net credit loss ratio increased from 10.08% to 10.77%, and the retail banking net credit loss ratio increased from 1.01% to 1.03%, with the increases in both businesses driven by the decline in their average loans.
2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 60% primarily due to the consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 effective January 2010. On a managed basis,revenues, net of interest expense, declined 4% from the prior-year period, mainly due to lower volumes in cards and mortgages, as well as the net impact of the CARD Act on branded cards revenues.
Net interest revenue was down 5% on a managed basis driven primarily by lower volumes in cards, with average managed loans down 6% from the prior-year period, and in mortgages, where average loans were down 13%.
Non-interest revenue declined 1% on a managed basis from the prior-year period, driven by lower gains from mortgage loan sales and lower fees in cards, due to a 15% decline in open accounts, partially offset by better servicing hedge results in mortgages.
Operating expenses increased 4% from the prior-year period. Expenses were flat excluding the impact of a litigation reserve in the first quarter of 2010.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $3.3 billion primarily due to the consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167. On a comparable basis,Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased $31 million, or 1%, primarily due to the absence of a $402 million loan loss reserve build in the prior-year period, offset by higher net credit losses in the branded cards portfolio. The cards managed net credit loss ratio increased from 9.17% to 10.72%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio increased from 0.84% to 0.97%.
Managed Presentations
| Second Quarter | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Managed credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans | 7.98 | % | 7.36 | % | |||
Impact from credit card securitizations(1) | — | (4.75 | )% | ||||
Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans | 7.98 | % | 2.61 | % | |||
EMEA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING
EMEA Regional Consumer Banking (EMEA RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses, primarily in Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Remaining activities in respect of Western Europe retail banking are included in Citi Holdings.EMEA RCB has repositioned its business, shifting from a strategy of widespread distribution to a focused strategy concentrating on larger urban markets within the region. An exception is Bank Handlowy, which has a mass market presence in Poland. The countries in whichEMEA RCB has the largest presence are Poland, Turkey, Russia and the United Arab Emirates. At June 30, 2010,EMEA RCB had approximately 304 retail bank branches with approximately 3.7 million customer accounts, $4.3 billion in retail banking loans and $8.9 billion in average deposits. In addition, the business had approximately 2.4 million Citi-branded card accounts with $2.6 billion in outstanding card loan balances.
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 230 | $ | 243 | (5 | )% | $ | 478 | $ | 467 | 2 | % | |||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 146 | 151 | (3 | ) | 303 | 287 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 376 | $ | 394 | (5 | )% | $ | 781 | $ | 754 | 4 | % | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 268 | $ | 282 | (5 | )% | $ | 545 | $ | 538 | 1 | % | |||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 85 | $ | 121 | (30 | )% | $ | 182 | $ | 210 | (13 | )% | |||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments | (4 | ) | — | — | (4 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
Credit reserve build (release) | (46 | ) | 158 | NM | (56 | ) | 230 | NM | |||||||||||||
Provisions for benefits and claims | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 35 | $ | 279 | (87 | )% | $ | 122 | $ | 440 | (72 | )% | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 73 | $ | (167 | ) | NM | $ | 114 | $ | (224 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | 23 | (57 | ) | NM | 37 | (81 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 50 | $ | (110 | ) | NM | $ | 77 | $ | (143 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 50 | $ | (110 | ) | NM | $ | 77 | $ | (143 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 10 | $ | 11 | (9 | )% | $ | 10 | $ | 11 | (9 | )% | |||||||||
Return on assets | 2.01 | % | (4.01 | )% | 1.55 | % | (2.62 | )% | |||||||||||||
Average deposits(in billions of dollars) | $ | 8.9 | $ | 9.0 | (1 | )% | $ | 9.3 | $ | 8.7 | 7 | % | |||||||||
Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans | 4.74 | % | 5.78 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Revenue by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 205 | $ | 234 | (12 | )% | $ | 427 | $ | 439 | (3 | )% | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 171 | 160 | 7 | 354 | 315 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 376 | $ | 394 | (5 | )% | $ | 781 | $ | 754 | 4 | % | |||||||||
�� | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 9 | $ | (76 | ) | NM | $ | 3 | $ | (117 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 41 | (34 | ) | NM | 74 | (26 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 50 | $ | (110 | ) | NM | $ | 77 | $ | (143 | ) | NM | |||||||||
2Q10 vs. 2Q09
Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 5%. A majority of the decrease is due to lower lending volumes and balances as a result of tighter origination criteria as the business was repositioned. This was partially offset by higher revenues in cards and wealth management and the impact of foreign exchange translation (generally referred to throughout this report as "FX translation"). Cards purchase sales were up 11% and investment sales were up 40%. Assets under management decreased 9% primarily due to market valuations.
Net interest revenue decreased 5% due to lower Average Loans, particularly in the United Arab Emirates, Romania and Poland. Average retail and card loans decreased 20% and 4%, respectively.
Non-interest revenue decreased 3%.
Operating expenses decreased 5%, mainly due to cost savings from branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering benefits, partially offset by the impact of FX translation.
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 87%, mainly due to the impact of a $46 million loan loss reserve release in the current quarter, compared to a $158 million build in the prior-year quarter, and a 30% decline in net credit losses, driven by improvements in credit conditions across most markets. The release in loan loss reserves in the current period was driven by improvement in the credit environment in most countries, coupled with a decline in receivables. The cards net credit loss ratio decreased from 6.73% in the prior-year quarter to 5.79% in the current quarter. The retail banking net credit loss ratio decreased from 5.30% in the prior-year quarter to 4.10% in the current quarter.
2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 4%. The increase in revenues was primarily attributable to the impact of FX translation and higher revenues in cards due to higher volumes, partially offset by lower lending revenues, as a result of lower volumes due to tighter origination criteria as the business was repositioned. Cards purchase sales increased 14% and average cards loans grew 6%.
Net interest revenue increased 2%, mainly due to higher cards revenues, particularly in Russia and Poland, and the impact of FX translation.
Non-interest revenue increased 6%, primarily driven by higher results from an equity investment in Turkey.
Operating expenses increased 1% driven by the impact of FX translation, largely offset by cost savings from branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering benefits.
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 72%, mainly due to the impact of net loan loss reserve release of $56 million in the first half of 2010, compared to a $230 million build in the prior-year period, and a 13% decline in net credit losses. The release of loan loss reserves in the current period was driven by improvement in the credit environment in most countries, coupled with a decline in receivables. The cards net credit loss ratio increased from 5.68% to 6.41%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio decreased from 4.91% to 3.91%.
MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSISLATIN AMERICA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING
SECOND QUARTER OF 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARYLatin America Regional Consumer Banking (LATAM RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses, with the largest presence in Mexico and Brazil.LATAM RCB includes branch networks throughoutLatin America as well as Banamex, Mexico's second largest bank with over 1,700 branches. At June 30, 2010,LATAM RCB had approximately 2,205 retail branches, with 25.9 million customer accounts, $19.6 billion in retail banking loan balances and $39.9 billion in average deposits. In addition, the business had approximately 12.2 million Citi-branded card accounts with $12.0 billion in outstanding loan balances.
Citigroup reported net income of $4.279 billion, $0.49 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2009. The results included a $6.7 billion after-tax gain on the sale of Smith Barney. The $0.49 earnings per share reflected preferred stock dividends and the quarterly accretion of the Series H preferred stock discount (the preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of TARP in October 2008). See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs" below.
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 1,471 | $ | 1,368 | 8 | % | $ | 2,929 | $ | 2,643 | 11 | % | |||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 647 | 582 | 11 | 1,265 | 1,231 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 2,118 | $ | 1,950 | 9 | % | $ | 4,194 | $ | 3,874 | 8 | % | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 1,266 | $ | 1,090 | 16 | % | $ | 2,408 | $ | 2,048 | 18 | % | |||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 457 | $ | 610 | (25 | )% | $ | 966 | $ | 1,151 | (16 | )% | |||||||||
Credit reserve build (release) | (241 | ) | 156 | NM | (377 | ) | 322 | NM | |||||||||||||
Provision for benefits and claims | 22 | 27 | (19 | ) | 58 | 56 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 238 | $ | 793 | (70 | )% | $ | 647 | $ | 1,529 | (58 | )% | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 614 | $ | 67 | NM | $ | 1,139 | $ | 297 | NM | |||||||||||
Income taxes | 123 | (49 | ) | NM | 259 | (38 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 491 | $ | 116 | NM | $ | 880 | $ | 335 | NM | |||||||||||
Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | (5 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 491 | $ | 116 | NM | $ | 885 | $ | 335 | NM | |||||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 74 | $ | 66 | 12 | $ | 73 | $ | 63 | 16 | % | ||||||||||
Return on assets | 2.66 | % | 0.70 | % | 2.44 | % | 1.07 | % | |||||||||||||
Average deposits(in billions of dollars) | 39.9 | 36.0 | 11 | % | 39.8 | 35.1 | 13 | % | |||||||||||||
Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans | 5.84 | % | 8.68 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Revenue by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 1,236 | $ | 1,112 | 11 | % | $ | 2,432 | $ | 2,138 | 14 | % | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 882 | 838 | 5 | 1,762 | 1,736 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,118 | $ | 1,950 | 9 | % | $ | 4,194 | $ | 3,874 | 8 | % | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 275 | $ | 196 | 40 | % | $ | 531 | $ | 426 | 25 | % | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 216 | (80 | ) | NM | 349 | (91 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 491 | $ | 116 | NM | $ | 880 | $ | 335 | NM | |||||||||||
2Q10 vs. 2Q09
Revenues, net of interest expense of $30.0 billion, increased 71% from year-ago levels9%, mainly due primarily to the Smith Barney gain on saleimpact of FX translation and positive revenue markshigher lending and gains, relative to the prior-year period,deposit volumes in Citi Holdings,retail banking, partially offset by lower volumes in the impact of foreign exchange translation and declinescards portfolio, due to continued repositioning, particularly in Regional Consumer Banking revenues, primarily in Cards. The difficult economic environment continued to have a negative impact on all businesses.Mexico.
Net interest revenue declinedincreased 8% from, mainly driven by the 2008 second quarter, reflecting the Company's smaller balance sheet. Net interest marginimpact of FX translation and higher lending and deposit volumes in retail banking. Average retail banking loans and deposits increased 19% and 11%, respectively. The increase in retail banking volumes was partially offset by lower volumes in the second quartercards business as a result of 2009 was 3.24%, up 7 basis points from the second quarter of 2008, reflecting significantlya lower cost of funding, largely offset by a decrease in asset yields related to the decrease in the Federal funds rate and the FDIC special assessment of $333 million.risk profile.
Non-interest revenue increased $13.6 billion from a year ago,11%, primarily reflectingdue to the gain on saleimpact of Smith Barney, lower write-downsFX translation, higher fees in the cards business and gains on exposures in Citi Holdings.higher investment sales revenues.
Operating expenses decreased 21% from the previous year, reflecting benefits from Citi's ongoing re-engineering efforts, expense control, andincreased 16%, due to the impact of foreign exchange translation. HeadcountFX translation, marketing initiatives and a cards intangible impairment.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 70%, mainly due to the impact of 279,000 was down 84,000a $241 million loan loss reserve release in the current period, compared to a $156 million build in the prior-year quarter, and a 25% decline in net credit losses, reflecting improved credit conditions, especially in Mexico cards. The cards net credit loss ratio declined across the region during the period, from June 30, 2008 and 30,00015.91% to 12.07%, reflecting continued economic recovery. The retail banking net credit loss ratio dropped significantly from March 31, 2009.3.40% to 1.98%.
The Company's equity capital base and trust preferred securities were $176.3 billion at June 30, 2009. Citigroup's stockholders' equity increased by $8.4 billion during the second quarter of 2009 to $152.3 billion, primarily reflecting net income less dividend payouts and an improvement inAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The Company distributed $1.55 billion in dividends to its preferred stockholders during the quarter. Citigroup had a Tier 1 Capital ratio of 12.74% at June 30, 2009.2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD
On July 23, 2009Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 8%, mainly due to the impact of FX translation and July 29, 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers withhigher lending and deposit volumes in retail banking, partially offset by spread compression and lower volumes in the privatecards portfolio due to continued repositioning, particularly in Mexico.
Net interest revenue increased 11%, mainly driven by the impact of FX translation and public holders, respectively, of preferred stockhigher lending and trust preferred securities, as applicable ($32.8 billiondeposit volumes in aggregate liquidation value). In connection with these exchanges, the U.S. Treasury (UST) also exchanged $25 billion of aggregate liquidation value of its preferred stock, for a total exchange of $57.8 billion. Following anretail banking. Average retail banking loans and deposits increased 20% and 13%, respectively. The increase in Citigroup's authorized common stock,retail banking was partially offset by spread compression and lower volumes in the conversion of interim securities to common stock, the UST will own approximately 33.6% of Citigroup's outstanding common stock (not including the exercise of the warrants issued to the USTcards portfolio as part of TARP). See "Events of 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" and "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs."
As a result of the closing of the private and public exchange offers, Citigroup will increase its Tier 1 common by approximately $64 billion from the second quarter of 2009 level of $27 billion to approximately $91 billion. In addition, Citigroup's Tangible Common Equity (TCE)a lower risk profile.
Non-interest revenue increased 3%, which was $40 billion as of June 30, 2009, will increase by approximately $60 billion to approximately $100 billion. (TCE and Tier 1 Common are non-GAAP financial measures. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" for additional information on these measures, including a reconciliationdue to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.)impact of FX translation, higher fees in the cards business and higher investment sales revenues.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a net build of $3.9 billion to its credit reserves. The net build consisted of $1.2 billion in Citicorp ($0.6 billion in Regional Consumer Banking and $0.6 billion in ICG) and $2.7 billion in Citi Holdings (almost all in Local Consumer Lending). The consumer loan delinquency rate was 4.24% at June 30, 2009, compared to 3.93% at March 31, 2009 and 2.30% a year ago. Corporate non-accrual loans were $12.4 billion at June 30, 2009, compared to $11.2 billion at March 31, 2009 and $2.2 billion a year-ago. The increase from prior-year levels is primarily attributableOperating expenses increased 18%, mainly due to the transferimpact of non-accrual loans fromFX translation. Excluding the held-for-sale portfolio toimpact of FX translation, the held-for-investment portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2008. The allowance for loan losses totaled $35.9 billion at June 30, 2009, a coverage ratio of 5.60% of total loans.
The Company's effective tax rate was 17.1%increase in the second quarter of 2009, which includes a tax benefit of $129 million relating to the conclusion of an audit of certain issues in the Company's 2003-2005 U.S. Federal tax audit.
Total deposits were approximately $804.7 billion at June 30, 2009, up 6% from March 31, 2009 and flat with prior-year levels. At June 30, 2009, the Company has increased its structural liquidity (equity, long-term debt and deposits) as a percentage of assets from 68% at March 31, 2009 to approximately 71% at June 30, 2009. Citigroup has continued its deleveraging, reducing total assets from $2,100 billion a year ago to $1,849 billion at June 30, 2009.
In July 2009, Citi appointed three new directors to its board. Additionally, the Company recently announced several senior management appointments, including John Gerspach as Chief Financial Officer, replacing Ned Kelly, who was appointed Vice Chairman of Citigroup, and Eugene McQuade as Chief Executive Officer for Citibank, N.A.operating
EVENTS IN 2009
Certain significant events have occurred during the fiscal year to date, including events subsequent to June 30, 2009, that had, or could have, an effect on Citigroup's current and future financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. Certain of these events are summarized below and discussed in more detail throughout this MD&A.
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE EXCHANGE OFFERS
Private Exchange Offers
On July 23, 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with the private holders of $12.5 billion aggregate liquidation value of preferred stock. As previously disclosed, the U.S. Treasury (UST) matched these exchange offers by exchanging $12.5 billion aggregate liquidation value of its preferred stock, for a total closing of $25 billion. The preferred stock heldexpenses was driven by the private holderscost of 139 additional branch openings and the UST was exchangedmarketing initiatives, primarily in Mexico.
Provisions for an aggregate of approximately 7,692 shares of interim securitiesloan losses and warrants. The warrants will terminatefor benefits and the interim securities will automatically convert into Citigroup common stock upon the increase, subject to shareholder approval, in Citigroup's authorized common stock at a ratio of one million shares of common stock for each interim security. Following the authorized share increase, the interim securities issuedclaims decreased 58%, mainly due to the private holders and the UST in this closing will convert into approximately 7.7 billion sharesimpact of Citigroup common stock.
The shareholder approval on the proposed increase in Citigroup's authorized common stock is scheduled to occur on September 2, 2009. In addition, see "Public Exchange Offers" below.
Public Exchange Offers
On July 29, 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with certain holdersnet loan loss reserve release of its publicly-held preferred stock and trust preferred securities. Approximately $20.3 billion in aggregate liquidation value of publicly-held preferred stock and trust preferred securities were validly tendered and not withdrawn$377 million in the public exchange offers. This represents 99%first half of the total liquidation value of securities that Citigroup was offering2010, compared to exchange.
Upon closing of the public exchange offers, Citi issued approximately 5.8 billion shares of common stock to the public exchange offer participants. In accordance with the instructions given by the participantsa $322 million build in the public exchange offers, these shares of common stock are subjectprior-year period, and a 16% decline in net credit losses, reflecting improved credit conditions, especially in Mexico cards. The cards net credit loss ratio declined from 15.5% to an irrevocable proxy13.0%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio declined from 3.2% to vote in favor of the proposal to increase Citigroup's authorized common stock, among other matters, which will result in the termination of the warrants and the automatic conversion of the interim securities issued to the UST and the private holders in the private exchange offers into common stock (see "Private Exchange Offers" above)2.0%.
In addition, as previously disclosed, on July 30, 2009, the UST matched the public exchange offers by exchanging an additional $12.5 billion aggregate liquidation value of its preferred stock, resulting in Citi's issuing approximately 3,846 additional shares of interim securities to the UST and increasing the number of shares of common stock the UST may acquire upon exercise of the warrant issued to it in connection with the private exchange offers closing. The warrant will terminate and these interim securities will convert into approximately 3.8 billion shares of Citigroup common stock following the authorized share increase.
In total, approximately $58 billion in aggregate liquidation value of preferred stock and trust preferred securities were exchanged to common stock and interim securities as a result of the completion of the private and public exchange offers and the associated exchange by the UST. Upon the increase in Citigroup's authorized common stock, and the conversion of the interim securities to common stock, the UST will own approximately 33.6% of Citigroup's outstanding common stock, not including the exercise of the warrants issued to the UST as part of TARP and pursuant to the loss-sharing agreement. See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs" below.
Capital Impact
As a result of the closing of the private and public exchange offers and the associated exchange by the UST on a proforma basis, Citigroup increased its Tier 1 Common by approximately $64 billion from the second quarter of 2009 level of approximately $27 billion to approximately $91 billion. In addition, Citigroup's tangible common equity (TCE), which was approximately $40 billion as of June 30, 2009, increased by approximately $60 billion to approximately $100 billion on a proforma basis. (TCE and Tier 1 Common are non-GAAP financial measures. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below for additional information on these measures, including a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.)
8% Trust Preferred Securities
On July 30, 2009, all remaining preferred stock of Citigroup held by the UST and FDIC (the UST and FDIC are collectively referred to as the "USG") that was not exchanged into Citigroup common stock in connection with the private or public exchange offers was exchanged into newly issued 8% trust preferred securities. An aggregate liquidation amount of approximately $27.1 billion in trust preferred securities was issued to the USG in exchange for an aggregate of $27.059 billion liquidation value of preferred stock.
Accounting Impact
The accounting for the exchange offers will result in the de-recognition of preferred stock and the recognition of the common stock issued at fair value in theCommon stock andAdditional paid-in capital accounts in equity. The difference between the carrying amount of preferred stock and the fair value of the common stock will be recorded inRetained earnings (impacting net income available to common shareholders and EPS) orAdditional paid-in capital accounts in equity, depending on whether the preferred stock was originally non-convertible or convertible.
For USG preferred stock that was converted to 8% trust preferred securities, the newly issued trust preferred securities will be initially recorded at fair value asLong-term debt. The difference between the carrying amount of the preferred stock and the fair value of the trust preferred securities will be
recorded in
ASIA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING
Retained earningsAsia Regional Consumer Banking (Asia RCB) after adjusting for appropriate deferred tax liability (impactingprovides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses, with the largest Citi presence in South Korea, Australia, Singapore, India, Taiwan, Malaysia, Japan and Hong Kong. At June 30, 2010,Asia RCB had approximately 704 retail branches, 16.0 million retail banking accounts, $97.1 billion in average customer deposits, and $55.0 billion in retail banking loans. In addition, the business had approximately 14.9 million Citi-branded card accounts with $17.6 billion in outstanding loan balances.
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 1,295 | $ | 1,199 | 8 | % | $ | 2,552 | $ | 2,350 | 9 | % | |||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 550 | 476 | 16 | 1,093 | 891 | 23 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 1,845 | $ | 1,675 | 10 | % | $ | 3,645 | $ | 3,241 | 12 | % | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 949 | $ | 845 | 12 | % | $ | 1,856 | $ | 1,641 | 13 | % | |||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 254 | $ | 368 | (31 | )% | $ | 531 | $ | 655 | (19 | )% | |||||||||
Credit reserve build (release) | (112 | ) | 156 | NM | (150 | ) | 351 | NM | |||||||||||||
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 142 | $ | 524 | (73 | )% | $ | 381 | $ | 1,006 | (62 | )% | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 754 | $ | 306 | NM | $ | 1,408 | $ | 594 | NM | |||||||||||
Income taxes | 180 | 27 | NM | 258 | 67 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 574 | $ | 279 | NM | $ | 1,150 | $ | 527 | NM | |||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 574 | $ | 279 | NM | $ | 1,150 | $ | 527 | NM | |||||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 105 | $ | 88 | 19 | % | $ | 105 | $ | 87 | 21 | % | |||||||||
Return on assets | 2.19 | % | 1.27 | % | 2.21 | % | 1.22 | % | |||||||||||||
Average deposits(in billions of dollars) | 97.1 | 87.6 | 11 | % | 96.4 | 85.4 | 13 | % | |||||||||||||
Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans | 1.41 | % | 2.35 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Revenue by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 1,152 | $ | 1,067 | 8 | % | $ | 2,268 | $ | 2,077 | 9 | % | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 693 | 608 | 14 | 1,377 | 1,164 | 18 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,845 | $ | 1,675 | 10 | % | $ | 3,645 | $ | 3,241 | 12 | % | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 375 | $ | 273 | 37 | % | $ | 789 | $ | 493 | 60 | % | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 199 | 6 | NM | 361 | 34 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 574 | $ | 279 | NM | $ | 1,150 | $ | 527 | NM | |||||||||||
2Q10 vs. 2Q09
Revenues, net income available to common shareholdersof interest expense, increased 10%, reflecting higher cards purchase sales, investment sales, loan and EPS). For trust preferred securities exchanged for common stock, the carrying amount currently recorded as long-term debt will be de-recognizeddeposit volumes, and the common stock issued will be recorded at fair valueimpact of FX translation, partially offset by spread compression in retail banking.
Net interest revenue was 8% higher than the Common Stockprior-year period, mainly due to higher lending and deposit volumes and the Additional Paid-in Capital accounts in equity. The difference betweenimpact of FX translation. Average loans and deposits were up 15% and 11%, respectively. Spreads for branded cards remained relatively flat, while retail banking spreads declined marginally, due to mix and a continued low interest rate environment relative to the carrying amount of the trust preferred securitiesprior-year quarter.
Non-interest revenue increased 16%, primarily due to higher investment revenues, higher cards purchase sales, higher revenues from deposit products, and the fair valueimpact of FX translation.
Operating expenses increased 12%, primarily due to the common stock will be recordedimpact of FX translation. Excluding the impact of FX translation, the increase was driven primarily by an increase in volumes and higher investment spending.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 73%, mainly due to the impact of a $112 million loan loss reserve release in the current earningsquarter, compared to a $156 million loan loss reserve build in the prior-year quarter, and a decrease in net credit losses of the period in which the transaction will occur.
The following table presents31%. These declines were partially offset by the impact of FX translation. Delinquencies and net credit losses continued to decline from their peak level in the completionsecond quarter of all stages2009 as the region benefitted from continued economic recovery and increased levels of customer activity, with India showing the exchange offersmost significant improvement. The cards net credit loss ratio decreased from 5.94% in the prior-year quarter to Citigroup's common shares outstanding and3.90% in the current quarter. The retail banking net credit loss ratio decreased from 1.10% in the prior-year quarter to its balance sheet:
(in millions of dollars, except incremental number of Citigroup common shares) | Impact on | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Security | Notional Amounts | Converting Into | Incremental Number of Citigroup Common Shares | Date of Settlement | Other Assets(4) | Long- Term Debt | Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Additional Paid In Capital | Income Statement(3) | Retained Earnings(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | (in millions) | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Convertible Preferred Stock held by Private Investors | $ | 12,500 | Interim Securities/ Common Stock(1) | 3,846 | 7/23/2009 | $ | — | — | $ | (12,500 | ) | $ | 38 | $ | 21,801 | $ | — | $ | (9,340 | ) | |||||||||||||
Convertible Preferred Stock held by Public Investors | 3,146 | Common Stock | 823 | 7/29/2009 | — | — | (3,146 | ) | 8 | 5,127 | — | (1,990 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Convertible Preferred Stock held by Public Investors | 11,465 | Common Stock | 3,351 | 7/29/2009 | — | — | (11,465 | ) | 34 | 9,116 | — | 2,316 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Trust Preferred Securities held by Public Investors | 5,760 | Common Stock | 1,660 | 7/29/2009 | (622 | )* | (6,034 | )* | — | 17 | 4,515 | 893 | * | 893 | * | ||||||||||||||||||
USG TARP Preferred Stock matching the Preferred Stock held by Private Investors | 12,500 | Interim Securities/ Common Stock(1) | 3,846 | 7/23/2009 | — | — | (11,924 | ) | 38 | 10,615 | — | 1,270 | |||||||||||||||||||||
USG TARP Preferred Stock matching the Preferred Stock and Trust Preferred Securities held by Public Investors | 12,500 | Interim Securities/ Common Stock(1) | 3,846 | 7/30/2009 | — | — | (11,926 | ) | 38 | 10,615 | — | 1,272 | |||||||||||||||||||||
USG TARP Preferred Stock | 20,000 | TruPS | — | 7/30/2009 | (2,883 | ) | 12,004 | (19,514 | ) | — | — | — | 4,627 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Convertible Preferred Stock held by U.S. Treasury and FDIC related to covered asset guarantee (loss-sharing agreement) | 7,059 | TruPS | — | 7/30/2009 | (503 | ) | 4,237 | (3,530 | ) | — | — | — | (1,210 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | 17,372 | $ | (4,008 | ) | $ | 10,207 | $ | (74,005 | ) | $ | 173 | $ | 61,789 | $ | 893 | $ | (2,162 | ) |
Note: Table may not foot due to roundings.
Summary0.61% in the current quarter.
The additional estimated $60 billion2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD
Revenues, net of TCE is primarily the result of the exchange of approximately $74 billion carrying amount of preferred shares and $6 billion carrying value of trust preferred securities for 17,372 million shares of common stock and approximately $27.1 billion liquidation amount of trust preferred securities (recorded as Long-term Debt at its fair value of $16.2 billion). This resulted in an increase to common stock and APIC of $62 billion and a reduction inRetained earningsinterest expense, of approximately $2 billion, for a total increase in TCE of approximately $60 billion.
The additional $64 billion of Tier 1 Common includesincreased 12%, driven by higher cards purchase sales, investment sales and loan and deposit volumes, and the impact of FX translation, partially offset by spread compression in retail banking.
Net interest revenue was 9% higher than the above plusprior-year period, mainly due to higher lending and deposit volumes and the impact of FX translation, offset by lower spreads.
Non-interest revenue increased 23%, primarily due to higher investment revenues, higher cards purchase sales, and the impact of FX translation.
Operating expenses increased 13%, primarily due to the impact of FX translation, increase in volumes and higher investment spending.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 62%, mainly due to the impact of a reductionnet loan loss reserve release of $150 million in the disallowed Deferred tax asset (which increases Tier 1 Common) that arises fromfirst half of 2010, compared to a $351 million loan loss reserve build in the accounting for the transactions. TCEprior-year period, and Tier 1 Common are non-GAAP financial measures. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below for additional information on these measures, including a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
Earnings per share in the third quarter of 2009 will be impacted by (1) the increase in shares outstanding as a result of the issuance of common shares and interim securities and the timing thereof, (2) the net impact toRetained earnings and income statement resulting from the preferred share and trust preferred securities exchange and (3) dividends on USG preferred shares accrued up to the date of their conversion to interim securities and trust preferred securities.FX translation.
TAX BENEFITS PRESERVATION PLAN
INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS GROUP
AsInstitutional Clients Group (ICG) includesSecurities and Banking andTransaction Services.ICG provides corporate, institutional and ultra-high net worth clients with a full range of products and services, including cash management, trading, underwriting, lending and advisory services, around the world.ICG's international presence is supported by trading floors in approximately 75 countries and a proprietary network withinTransaction Services in over 95 countries. At June 30, 2009, Citigroup2010,ICG had recognizedapproximately $944 billion of average assets and $427 billion of deposits.
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Commissions and fees | $ | 1,086 | $ | 1,019 | 7 | % | 2,194 | 1,978 | 11 | % | ||||||||||
Administration and other fiduciary fees | 615 | 712 | (14 | ) | 1,336 | 1,420 | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||
Investment banking | 592 | 1,240 | (52 | ) | 1,545 | 2,181 | (29 | ) | ||||||||||||
Principal transactions | 1,632 | 880 | 85 | 4,976 | 7,830 | (36 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other | 564 | 699 | (19 | ) | 925 | 1,046 | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest revenue | $ | 4,489 | $ | 4,550 | (1 | )% | 10,976 | 14,455 | (24 | )% | ||||||||||
Net interest revenue (including dividends) | 3,968 | 4,634 | (14 | ) | 7,921 | 9,303 | (15 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 8,457 | $ | 9,184 | (8 | )% | 18,897 | 23,758 | (20 | )% | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 5,108 | 4,365 | 17 | 9,656 | 8,260 | 17 | ||||||||||||||
Net credit losses | 43 | 169 | (75 | ) | 145 | 246 | (41 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments | (22 | ) | 83 | NM | (29 | ) | 115 | NM | ||||||||||||
Credit reserve build (release) | (231 | ) | 612 | NM | (411 | ) | 924 | NM | ||||||||||||
Provisions for benefits and claims | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | (210 | ) | $ | 864 | NM | (295 | ) | 1,285 | NM | ||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 3,559 | $ | 3,955 | (10 | )% | 9,536 | 14,213 | (33 | )% | ||||||||||
Income taxes | 940 | 1,143 | (18 | ) | 2,770 | 4,361 | (36 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 2,619 | $ | 2,812 | (7 | )% | 6,766 | 9,852 | (31 | )% | ||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 20 | 3 | NM | 46 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 2,599 | $ | 2,809 | (7 | )% | 6,720 | 9,852 | (32 | )% | ||||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 944 | $ | 835 | 13 | % | 935 | 832 | 12 | % | ||||||||||
Return on assets | 1.10 | % | 1.35 | % | 1.45 | % | 2.39 | % | ||||||||||||
Revenues by region | ||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 3,263 | $ | 2,377 | 37 | % | 7,455 | 7,982 | (7 | )% | ||||||||||
EMEA | 2,610 | 3,418 | (24 | ) | 5,958 | 8,484 | (30 | ) | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 914 | 1,389 | (34 | ) | 1,865 | 2,532 | (26 | ) | ||||||||||||
Asia | 1,670 | 2,000 | (17 | ) | 3,619 | 4,760 | (24 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 8,457 | $ | 9,184 | (8 | )% | 18,897 | 23,758 | (20 | )% | ||||||||||
Income from continuing operations by region | ||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 1,005 | $ | 149 | NM | 2,588 | 2,784 | (7 | )% | |||||||||||
EMEA | 673 | 1,096 | (39 | )% | 2,011 | 3,593 | (44 | ) | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 350 | 677 | (48 | ) | 779 | 1,249 | (38 | ) | ||||||||||||
Asia | 591 | 890 | (34 | ) | 1,388 | 2,226 | (38 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total income from continuing operations | $ | 2,619 | $ | 2,812 | (7 | )% | 6,766 | 9,852 | (31 | )% | ||||||||||
Average loans by region(in billions of dollars) | ||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 68 | $ | 55 | 24 | % | ||||||||||||||
EMEA | 37 | 48 | (23 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Latin America | 21 | 21 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Asia | 34 | 28 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||
Total average loans | $ | 160 | $ | 152 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Securities and Banking (S&B) offers a wide array of investment and commercial banking services and products for corporations, governments, institutional and retail investors, and ultra-high net deferred tax assetsworth individuals.S&B includes investment banking and advisory services, lending, debt and equity sales and trading, institutional brokerage, foreign exchange, structured products, cash instruments and related derivatives, and private banking.S&B revenue is generated primarily from fees for investment banking and advisory services, fees and interest on loans, fees and spread on foreign exchange, structured products, cash instruments and related derivatives, income earned on principal transactions, and fees and spreads on private banking services.
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 2,570 | $ | 3,179 | (19 | )% | $ | 5,135 | $ | 6,442 | (20 | )% | ||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 3,385 | 3,522 | (4 | ) | 8,823 | 12,459 | (29 | ) | ||||||||||||
Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 5,955 | $ | 6,701 | (11 | )% | $ | 13,958 | $ | 18,901 | (26 | )% | ||||||||
Total operating expenses | 3,938 | 3,277 | 20 | 7,335 | 6,098 | 20 | ||||||||||||||
Net credit losses | 42 | 172 | (76 | ) | 143 | 246 | (42 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provisions for unfunded lending commitments | (22 | ) | 83 | NM | (29 | ) | 115 | NM | ||||||||||||
Credit reserve build (release) | (196 | ) | 604 | NM | (358 | ) | 918 | NM | ||||||||||||
Provisions for benefits and claims | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Provisions for credit losses and benefits and claims | $ | (176 | ) | $ | 859 | NM | $ | (244 | ) | $ | 1,279 | NM | ||||||||
Income before taxes and noncontrolling interests | $ | 2,193 | $ | 2,565 | (15 | )% | $ | 6,867 | $ | 11,524 | (40 | )% | ||||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | 508 | 727 | (30 | ) | 1,976 | 3,550 | (44 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | 1,685 | 1,838 | (8 | ) | 4,891 | 7,974 | (39 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 15 | — | — | 36 | 1 | NM | ||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,670 | $ | 1,838 | (9 | )% | $ | 4,855 | $ | 7,973 | (39 | )% | ||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 877 | $ | 776 | 13 | % | $ | 869 | $ | 773 | 12 | % | ||||||||
Return on assets | 0.76 | % | 0.95 | % | 1.13 | % | 2.08 | % | ||||||||||||
Revenues by region | ||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 2,627 | $ | 1,721 | 53 | % | $ | 6,180 | $ | 6,737 | (8 | )% | ||||||||
EMEA | 1,762 | 2,558 | (31 | ) | 4,277 | 6,780 | (37 | ) | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 558 | 1,049 | (47 | ) | 1,165 | 1,849 | (37 | ) | ||||||||||||
Asia | 1,008 | 1,373 | (27 | ) | 2,336 | 3,535 | (34 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 5,955 | $ | 6,701 | (11 | )% | $ | 13,958 | $ | 18,901 | (26 | )% | ||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations by region | ||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 839 | (32 | ) | NM | $ | 2,263 | $ | 2,465 | (8 | )% | |||||||||
EMEA | 355 | 746 | (52 | )% | 1,387 | 2,917 | (52 | ) | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 197 | 527 | (63 | ) | 469 | 939 | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||
Asia | 294 | 597 | (51 | ) | 772 | 1,653 | (53 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total income from continuing operations | $ | 1,685 | 1,838 | (8 | )% | $ | 4,891 | $ | 7,974 | (39 | )% | |||||||||
Securities and Banking revenue details | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed income markets | $ | 3,713 | 5,569 | (33 | )% | $ | 9,093 | $ | 15,592 | (42 | )% | |||||||||
Total investment banking | 674 | 1,161 | (42 | ) | 1,731 | 2,144 | (19 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equity markets | 652 | 1,101 | (41 | ) | 1,865 | 2,706 | (31 | ) | ||||||||||||
Lending | 522 | (1,104 | ) | NM | 765 | (1,467 | ) | NM | ||||||||||||
Private bank | 512 | 481 | 6 | 1,006 | 985 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Other Securities and Banking | (118 | ) | (507 | ) | 77 | (502 | ) | (1,059 | ) | 53 | ||||||||||
Total Securities and Banking revenues | $ | 5,955 | 6,701 | (11 | )% | $ | 13,958 | $ | 18,901 | (26 | )% | |||||||||
2Q10 vs. 2Q09
Revenues, net of approximately $42interest expense, were $6.0 billion, compared to $6.7 billion in the prior-year quarter, resulting from a portiondecrease in fixed income markets, equity markets and investment banking revenues, partially offset by an increase in lending and private bank revenues. Fixed income markets revenues (excluding credit value adjustment (CVA), net of which is includedhedges, of $0.2 billion and $(0.2) billion in TCE. Citi's abilitythe current period and prior-year quarter, respectively) declined $2.3 billion to utilize its deferred tax assets to offset future taxable income may be significantly limited if Citi experiences an "ownership change", as defined in Section 382$3.5 billion, with a majority of the Internal Revenue Codedecline coming from weaker results in Credit Products and Securitized Products, which reflected a challenging market environment. Equity markets revenues (excluding CVA of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). In general, an ownership change will occur if there is a cumulative change in Citi's ownership by "5% shareholders" (as defined$32 million and $(0.7) billion in the Code) that exceeds 50 percentage points overcurrent period and prior-year quarter, respectively) declined $1.2 billion to $0.6 billion, driven by lower results in Derivatives, reflecting lower market and client volumes, and increased volatility. CVA increased $1.2 billion to $0.3 billion, mainly due to a rolling three-year period. As such, if the Company experiences an ownership change, its TCE may be reduced.
While the common stock issued pursuant to the private and public exchange offers (described above) did not result in an ownership change under the Code, the common stock issued did increase the cumulative change percentage for Section 382 purposes. On June 9, 2009, the board of directorswidening of Citigroup adoptedspreads throughout the current quarter, compared to a tax benefits preservation plan (the "Plan"). The purpose of the Plan is to minimize the likelihood of an ownership change occurring for Section 382 purposes and thus protect Citigroup's ability to utilize certain of its deferred tax assets, such as net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards, to offset future income.
In connection with the adoption of the Plan, Citigroup's board of directors declared a dividend of one preferred stock purchase right (a "Right") for each outstanding (i) share of common and (ii) 1-millionth of a share of the interim securities. The dividend was paid to holders of record of Citigroup's common stock on June 22, 2009. Shares of Citigroup's common stock and interim securities issued after June 22, 2009 will be issued with the Right attached. The terms and conditions of the Rights are set forthcontraction in the Tax Benefits Preservation Plan attached as Exhibit 4.1 to Citigroup's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 10, 2009.prior-year quarter. Investment banking revenues
THE SUPERVISORY CAPITAL ASSESSMENT PROGRAMTable of Contents
On May 7, 2009, the USG released the results of its Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP). The SCAP constituted a comprehensive capital assessment of the 19 largest U.S. financial institutions, including Citi. Based on the results of the USG's assessment under the SCAP, Citi was required to increase its previously announced plan to increase Tier 1 Common by an additional $5.5 billion. See "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above. In addition, Citi was required to develop and submit a capital plan to the FRB and FDIC. The Company submitted its capital plan to the regulators on June 8, 2009, as required. For additional information on the requirements of the capital plan, as well as other information on SCAP, see the "Events in 2009" section of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009.
LOSS-SHARING AGREEMENT
On January 15, 2009, Citigroup issued preferred shares to the UST and the FDIC, and a warrant to the UST, in exchange for $301 billion of loss protection on a specified pool of Citigroup assets. The Company is required to absorb the first $39.5 billion of qualifying losses under the agreement, plus 10% of the remaining losses incurred.
As a result of receipt of principal repayments and charge-offs, the total asset pool has declined by approximately $35 billion from the original $301decreased $0.5 billion to approximately $266.4 billion. Approximately $2.5$0.7 billion, also reflecting lower client market activity levels. Debt and equity underwriting revenues declined, reflecting lower overall issuance volumes, and advisory revenues decreased due to fewer completed deals, as a number of GAAP losses on the asset poolanticipated closings were recorded inmoved out of the second quarter of 2009, bringing2010. Lending revenues increased from $(1.1) billion to $0.5 billion, driven by gains from spread widening on credit default swap hedges.
Operating expenses increased 20% to $3.9 billion, mainly driven by the GAAPU.K. bonus tax of approximately $400 million. Expenses in the current quarter also reflected select investments in the businesses.
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased by $1.0 billion to date to approximately $5.3 billion. See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs—U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement" below.
The shares of preferred stock issued$(176) million, primarily attributable to the UST and FDICimpact of a $218 million credit reserve release in considerationthe current quarter, compared to a $687 million build in the prior-year quarter, as improvements continued in the corporate loan portfolio.
2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense, were $14.0 billion, compared to $18.9 billion for the loss-sharing agreement were subsequently exchanged into newly issued 8% trust preferred securities pursuantprior-year period, which was driven by a particularly strong 2009 first half due to robust fixed income markets and CVA. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in lending revenues, due to gains from spread widening on credit default swap hedges.
Operating expenses increased 20% to $7.3 billion, mainly driven by the U.K. bonus tax, higher transaction and compensation costs, and a litigation reserve release in the first half of 2009.
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased by $1.5 billion to $(244) million, primarily attributable to the exchange offers,impact of a $387 million credit reserve release in the first half of 2010, compared to a $1.0 billion build in the prior-year period, as described under "Public and Private Exchange Offers" above. For additional information ofimprovements continued in the warrant issued to the UST as part of this transaction, see "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs" below.corporate loan portfolio.
ITEMS IMPACTING CITICORP—SECURITIES AND BANKING
TRANSACTION SERVICES
Transaction Services is composed of Treasury and Trade Solutions (TTS) and Securities and Fund Services (SFS). TTS provides comprehensive cash management and trade finance for corporations, financial institutions and public sector entities worldwide. SFS provides custody and funds services to investors such as insurance companies and mutual funds, clearing services to intermediaries such as broker-dealers, and depository and agency/trust services to multinational corporations and governments globally. Revenue is generated from net interest revenue on deposits in TTS and SFS, as well as from trade loans and from fees for transaction processing and fees on assets under custody in SFS.
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 1,398 | $ | 1,455 | (4 | )% | $ | 2,786 | $ | 2,861 | (3 | )% | ||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 1,104 | 1,028 | 7 | 2,153 | 1,996 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 2,502 | $ | 2,483 | 1 | % | $ | 4,939 | $ | 4,857 | 2 | % | ||||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,170 | 1,088 | 8 | 2,321 | 2,162 | 7 | ||||||||||||||
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims | (34 | ) | 5 | NM | (51 | ) | 6 | NM | ||||||||||||
Income before taxes and noncontrolling interests | $ | 1,366 | $ | 1,390 | (2 | )% | $ | 2,669 | $ | 2,689 | (1 | )% | ||||||||
Income taxes | 432 | 416 | 4 | 794 | 811 | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | 934 | 974 | (4 | ) | 1,875 | 1,878 | — | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 5 | 3 | 67 | 10 | (1 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 929 | $ | 971 | (4 | )% | $ | 1,865 | $ | 1,879 | (1 | )% | ||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 67 | $ | 59 | 14 | % | $ | 66 | $ | 59 | 12 | % | ||||||||
Return on assets | 5.56 | % | 6.60 | % | 5.70 | % | 6.42 | % | ||||||||||||
Revenues by region | ||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 636 | $ | 656 | (3 | )% | $ | 1,275 | $ | 1,245 | 2 | % | ||||||||
EMEA | 848 | 860 | (1 | ) | 1,681 | 1,704 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 356 | 340 | 5 | 700 | 683 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Asia | 662 | 627 | 6 | 1,283 | 1,225 | 5 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 2,502 | $ | 2,483 | 1 | % | $ | 4,939 | $ | 4,857 | 2 | % | ||||||||
Revenue Details | ||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury and Trade Solutions | $ | 1,805 | $ | 1,793 | 1 | % | $ | 3,586 | $ | 3,543 | 1 | % | ||||||||
Securities and Fund Services | 697 | 690 | 1 | 1,353 | 1,314 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 2,502 | $ | 2,483 | 1 | % | $ | 4,939 | $ | 4,857 | 2 | % | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations by region | ||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 166 | $ | 181 | (8 | )% | $ | 325 | $ | 319 | 2 | % | ||||||||
EMEA | 318 | 350 | (9 | ) | 624 | 676 | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 153 | 150 | 2 | 310 | 310 | — | ||||||||||||||
Asia | 297 | 293 | 1 | 616 | 573 | 8 | ||||||||||||||
Total income from continuing operations | $ | 934 | $ | 974 | (4 | )% | $ | 1,875 | $ | 1,878 | — | |||||||||
Key indicators(in billions of dollars) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average deposits and other customer liability balances | $ | 320 | $ | 288 | 11 | % | ||||||||||||||
EOP assets under custody(in trillions of dollars) | 11.3 | 11.4 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
2Q10 vs. 2Q09
Revenues, net of interest expense, grew 1%, as improvement in fees in both the TTS and SFS businesses more than offset spread compression. TTS revenue increased 1%, driven primarily by growth in Trade and Cards businesses. SFS revenues increased 1%, driven by higher volumes and increased client activity.
Operating expenses increased 8%, primarily due to continued investment spending required to support future business growth, as well as higher transaction-related costs and the U.K. bonus tax.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims declined by $39 million, primarily attributable to a credit reserve release of $35 million.
Citicorp—2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense, grew 2% as improvement in fees in both the TTS and SFS businesses more than offset spread compression. TTS revenue increased 1%, driven primarily by growth in Trade and Cards businesses. SFS revenues increased 3%, driven by higher volumes and client activity.
Operating expenses increased 7%, primarily due to continued investment spending required to support future business growth, as well as higher transaction related costs and the U.K. bonus tax.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims declined by $57 million, primarily attributable to a credit reserve release of $53 million.
Citi Holdings contains businesses and portfolios of assets that Citigroup has determined are not central to its core Citicorp businesses. These noncore businesses tend to be more asset intensive and reliant on wholesale funding and also may be product-driven rather than client-driven. Citi intends to exit these businesses as quickly as practicable in an economically rational manner through business divestitures, portfolio run-offs and asset sales. Citi has made substantial progress divesting and exiting businesses from Citi Holdings, having completed more than 20 divestiture transactions since the beginning of 2009 through June 30, 2010, including Smith Barney, Nikko Cordial Securities, Nikko Asset Management, Primerica Financial Services, Credit Card businesses and Diners Club North America. Citi Holdings' GAAP assets have been reduced by approximately 20%, or $117 billion, from the second quarter of 2009, and 44% from the peak in the first quarter of 2008. Citi Holdings' GAAP assets of $465 billion represent approximately 24% of Citi's assets as of June 30, 2010. Citi Holdings' risk-weighted assets of approximately $400 billion represent approximately 40% of Citi's risk-weighted assets as of June 30, 2010. Asset reductions from Citi Holdings have the combined benefits of further fortifying Citigroup's capital base, lowering risk, simplifying the organization and allowing Citi to allocate capital to fund long-term strategic businesses.
Citi Holdings consists of the following businesses:Brokerage and Asset Management, Local Consumer Lending, andSpecial Asset Pool.
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 3,971 | $ | 4,162 | (5 | )% | $ | 8,346 | $ | 9,219 | (9 | )% | ||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 948 | 11,163 | (92 | ) | 3,123 | 9,200 | (66 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 4,919 | $ | 15,325 | (68 | )% | $ | 11,469 | $ | 18,419 | (38 | )% | ||||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 4,998 | $ | 6,781 | (26 | )% | $ | 10,239 | $ | 12,808 | (20 | )% | ||||||||
Credit reserve build (release) | (800 | ) | 2,645 | NM | (460 | ) | 4,282 | NM | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | $ | 4,198 | $ | 9,426 | (55 | )% | $ | 9,779 | $ | 17,090 | (43 | )% | ||||||||
Provision for benefits and claims | 185 | 267 | (31 | ) | 428 | 557 | (23 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments | (45 | ) | 52 | NM | (71 | ) | 80 | NM | ||||||||||||
Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 4,338 | $ | 9,745 | (55 | )% | $ | 10,136 | $ | 17,727 | (43 | )% | ||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 2,424 | $ | 3,609 | (33 | )% | $ | 4,998 | $ | 7,794 | (36 | )% | ||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes | $ | (1,843 | ) | $ | 1,971 | NM | $ | (3,665 | ) | $ | (7,102 | ) | 48 | % | ||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (646 | ) | 789 | NM | (1,592 | ) | (2,799 | ) | 43 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (1,197 | ) | $ | 1,182 | NM | $ | (2,073 | ) | $ | (4,303 | ) | 52 | % | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 8 | (37 | ) | NM | 19 | (48 | ) | NM | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (1,205 | ) | $ | 1,219 | NM | $ | (2,092 | ) | $ | (4,255 | ) | 51 | % | ||||||
Balance sheet data(in billions of dollars) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total EOP assets | $ | 465 | $ | 582 | (20 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Total EOP deposits | $ | 82 | $ | 84 | (2 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Total GAAP Revenues | $ | 4,919 | $ | 15,325 | (68 | )% | $ | 11,469 | $ | 18,419 | (38 | )% | ||||||||
Net Impact of Credit Card Securitization Activity(1) | — | 1,482 | NM | — | 2,450 | NM | ||||||||||||||
Total Managed Revenues | $ | 4,919 | $ | 16,807 | (71 | )% | $ | 11,469 | $ | 20,869 | (45 | )% | ||||||||
GAAP Net Credit Losses | $ | 4,998 | $ | 6,781 | (26 | )% | $ | 10,239 | $ | 12,808 | (20 | )% | ||||||||
Impact of Credit Card Securitization Activity(1) | — | 1,278 | NM | — | 2,335 | NM | ||||||||||||||
Total Managed Net Credit Losses | $ | 4,998 | $ | 8,059 | (38 | )% | $ | 10,239 | $ | 15,143 | (32 | )% | ||||||||
BROKERAGE AND ASSET MANAGEMENT
Brokerage and Asset Management (BAM), which constituted approximately 6% of Citi Holdings by assets as of June 30, 2010, consists of Citi's global retail brokerage and asset management businesses. This segment was substantially affected by, and reduced in size in 2009, due to the sale of Smith Barney (SB) to the MSSB JV and Nikko Cordial Securities. At June 30, 2010,BAM had approximately $30 billion of assets, primarily consisting of Citi's investment in, and assets related to, the MSSB JV. Morgan Stanley has options to purchase Citi's remaining stake in the MSSB JV over three years starting in 2012.
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | (71 | ) | $ | 162 | NM | $ | (136 | ) | $ | 526 | NM | ||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 212 | 12,058 | (98 | )% | 617 | 13,301 | (95 | )% | ||||||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 141 | $ | 12,220 | (99 | )% | $ | 481 | $ | 13,827 | (97 | )% | ||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 258 | $ | 1,044 | (75 | )% | $ | 523 | $ | 2,543 | (79 | )% | ||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 1 | $ | — | — | $ | 12 | $ | — | — | ||||||||||
Credit reserve build (release) | (3 | ) | 3 | NM | (10 | ) | 46 | NM | ||||||||||||
Provision for benefits and claims | 9 | 8 | 13 | % | 18 | 19 | (5 | )% | ||||||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments | (6 | ) | — | — | (6 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 1 | $ | 11 | (91 | )% | $ | 14 | $ | 65 | (78 | )% | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | (118 | ) | $ | 11,165 | NM | $ | (56 | ) | $ | 11,219 | (100 | )% | |||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (30 | ) | 4,390 | NM | (49 | ) | 4,410 | NM | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | (88 | ) | $ | 6,775 | NM | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 6,809 | (100 | )% | |||||||
Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 7 | 6 | 17 | % | 2 | (11 | ) | NM | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (95 | ) | $ | 6,769 | NM | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 6,820 | (100 | )% | |||||||
EOP assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 30 | $ | 51 | (41 | )% | ||||||||||||||
EOP deposits(in billions of dollars) | 57 | 56 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
NM Not meaningful
2Q10 vs. 2Q09
Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 99% primarily due to the absence of the $11.1 billion pre-tax gain on sale ($6.7 billion after-tax) on the sale of SB which closed on June 1, 2009. Excluding the gain, revenue declined $1.0 billion, or 88%, driven primarily by the absence of SB revenues.
Operating expenses decreased 75% from the prior-year quarter, mainly due to the absence of SB expenses.
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims declined 91%, mainly reflecting lower reserve builds of $6 million and lower provisions for unfunded lending commitments of $6 million.
Assets declined 41% versus the prior year, primarily driven by the sale of Nikko Cordial Securities and Banking SignificantNikko Asset Management.
2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 97% primarily due to the absence of the $11.1 billion pre-tax gain on the sale of SB ($6.7 billion after-tax) which closed on June 1, 2009. Excluding the gain, revenue declined $2.3 billion, or 83%, driven primarily by the absence of SB revenues.
Operating expenses decreased 79% from the prior-year period, primarily driven by the absence of expenses from the SB and Nikko businesses.
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims declined 78% primarily due to lower reserve builds of $56 million, partially offset by increased net credit losses of $12 million.
Local Consumer Lending (LCL), which constituted approximately 70% of Citi Holdings by assets as of June 30, 2010, includes a portion of Citigroup's North American mortgage business, retail partner cards, Western European cards and retail banking, CitiFinancial North America, Student Loan Corporation and other local consumer finance businesses globally. At June 30, 2010,LCL had $323 billion of assets ($294 billion inNorth America). Approximately $143 billion of assets inLCL as of June 30, 2010 consisted of U.S. mortgages in the company's CitiMortgage and CitiFinancial operations. The North American assets consist of residential mortgage loans (first and second mortgages), retail partner card loans, student loans, personal loans, auto loans, commercial real estate, and other consumer loans and assets.
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 3,688 | $ | 3,185 | 16 | % | $ | 7,708 | $ | 6,889 | 12 | % | |||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 518 | 296 | 75 | 1,168 | 2,613 | (55 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense(1) | $ | 4,206 | $ | 3,481 | 21 | % | $ | 8,876 | $ | 9,502 | (7 | )% | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 2,046 | $ | 2,376 | (14 | )% | $ | 4,224 | $ | 4,846 | (13 | )% | |||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 4,535 | $ | 5,144 | (12 | )% | $ | 9,473 | $ | 9,661 | (2 | )% | |||||||||
Credit reserve build (release) | (421 | ) | 2,784 | NM | (35 | ) | 4,346 | NM | |||||||||||||
Provision for benefits and claims | 176 | 259 | (32 | ) | 410 | 538 | (24 | ) | |||||||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 4,290 | $ | 8,187 | (48 | )% | $ | 9,848 | $ | 14,545 | (32 | )% | |||||||||
Income (Loss) from continuing operations before taxes | $ | (2,130 | ) | $ | (7,082 | ) | 70 | % | $ | (5,196 | ) | $ | (9,889 | ) | 47 | % | |||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (900 | ) | (2,735 | ) | 67 | (2,128 | ) | (3,971 | ) | 46 | |||||||||||
Income (Loss) from continuing operations | $ | (1,230 | ) | $ | (4,347 | ) | 72 | % | $ | (3,068 | ) | $ | (5,918 | ) | 48 | % | |||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 7 | 5 | 40 | 7 | 11 | (36 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (1,237 | ) | $ | (4,352 | ) | 72 | % | $ | (3,075 | ) | $ | (5,929 | ) | 48 | % | |||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 333 | $ | 358 | (7 | )% | $ | 344 | $ | 363 | (5 | )% | |||||||||
Net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans(2) | 6.03 | % | 7.48 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Revenue by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
International | $ | 444 | $ | 689 | (36 | )% | $ | 779 | $ | 2,713 | (71 | )% | |||||||||
Retail Partner Cards | 2,113 | 789 | NM | 4,319 | 2,316 | 86 | |||||||||||||||
North America (ex Cards) | 1,649 | 2,003 | (18 | ) | 3,778 | 4,473 | (16 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total GAAP Revenues | $ | 4,206 | $ | 3,481 | 21 | % | $ | 8,876 | $ | 9,502 | (7 | )% | |||||||||
Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1) | — | 1,482 | NM | — | 2,450 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Total Managed Revenues | $ | 4,206 | $ | 4,963 | (15 | )% | $ | 8,876 | $ | 11,952 | (26 | )% | |||||||||
Net Credit Losses by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
International | $ | 495 | $ | 962 | (49 | )% | $ | 1,107 | $ | 1,780 | (38 | )% | |||||||||
Retail partner cards | 1,775 | 872 | NM | 3,707 | 1,773 | NM | |||||||||||||||
North America (ex Cards) | 2,265 | 3,310 | (32 | ) | 4,659 | 6,108 | (24 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total GAAP net credit losses | $ | 4,535 | $ | 5,144 | (12 | )% | $ | 9,473 | $ | 9,661 | (2 | )% | |||||||||
Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1) | — | 1,278 | NM | — | 2,335 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Total Managed Net Credit Losses | $ | 4,535 | $ | 6,422 | (29 | )% | $ | 9,473 | $ | 11,996 | (21 | )% | |||||||||
NM Not meaningful
2Q10 vs. 2Q09
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 21%, due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167, partially offset by lower balances due to portfolio run-off, asset sales and divestitures, and a higher mortgage repurchase reserve. Net interest revenue increased 16%, primarily due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167, partially offset by the impact of lower balances.
Operating expenses declined 14%, due to the impact of divestitures, lower volumes, re-engineering benefits and the absence of costs associated with the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, which was exited in the fourth quarter of 2009. These items were partially offset by higher restructuring expense in the current quarter due to the previously announced restructuring of Citi Financial.
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 48% from the prior quarter, reflecting a reserve release of $421 million, principally related to U.S. retail partner cards, in the current quarter, compared to a reserve build in the prior-year quarter of $2.8 billion. Lower net credit losses were partially offset by the impact of the adoption of SFAS 166/167. On a managed basis, net credit losses declined for the fourth consecutive quarter, driven by improvement in the international portfolios as well as U.S. mortgages and retail partner cards.
Assets declined 7% versus the prior year, primarily driven by portfolio run-off, higher loan loss reserve balances, and the impact of asset sales, partially offset by an increase of $41 billion resulting from the adoption of SFAS 166/167.
2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 7% from the prior-year period. Net interest revenue increased 12% due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167, partially offset by the impact of lower balances due to portfolio run-off and asset sales. Non-interest revenue declined 55%, primarily due to the absence of the $1.1 billion gain on sale of Redecard in first quarter of 2009 and a higher mortgage repurchase reserve in the second quarter.
Operating expenses decreased 13%, primarily due to the impact of divestitures, lower volumes, re-engineering actions and the absence of costs associated with the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, which was exited in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 32%, reflecting a net $35 million reserve release in the first half of 2010 compared to a $4.3 billion build in the comparable period of 2009. Lower net credit losses across most businesses were partially offset by the impact of the adoption of SFAS 166/167. On a managed basis, net credit losses were lower, driven by improvement in the international portfolios, as well as U.S. mortgages and retail partner cards.
Assets declined 5% versus the prior-year period, primarily driven by portfolio run-off, higher loan loss reserve balances, and the impact of asset sales and divestitures, partially offset by an increase of $41 billion resulting from the adoption of SFAS 166/167.
Managed Presentations
| Second Quarter | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Managed credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans | 6.03 | % | 7.48 | % | |||
Impact from credit card securitizations(1) | — | (0.74 | ) | ||||
Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans | 6.03 | % | 6.74 | % | |||
Special Asset Pool (SAP), which constituted approximately 24% of Citi Holdings by assets as of June 30, 2010, is a portfolio of securities, loans and other assets that Citigroup intends to actively reduce over time through asset sales and portfolio run-off. At June 30, 2010,SAP had $112 billion of assets.SAP assets have declined by $216 billion, or 66%, from peak levels in the fourth quarter of 2007, reflecting cumulative asset sales, write-downs and portfolio run-off.
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 354 | $ | 815 | (57 | )% | $ | 774 | $ | 1,804 | (57 | )% | ||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 218 | (1,191 | ) | NM | 1,338 | (6,714 | ) | NM | ||||||||||||
Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 572 | $ | (376 | ) | NM | $ | 2,112 | $ | (4,910 | ) | NM | ||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 120 | $ | 189 | (37 | )% | $ | 251 | $ | 405 | (38 | )% | ||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 462 | $ | 1,637 | (72 | )% | $ | 754 | $ | 3,147 | (76 | )% | ||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments | (39 | ) | 52 | NM | (65 | ) | 80 | NM | ||||||||||||
Credit reserve builds (release) | (376 | ) | (142 | ) | NM | (415 | ) | (110 | ) | NM | ||||||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 47 | $ | 1,547 | (97 | )% | $ | 274 | $ | 3,117 | (91 | )% | ||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 405 | $ | (2,112 | ) | NM | $ | 1,587 | $ | (8,432 | ) | NM | ||||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | 284 | (866 | ) | NM | 585 | (3,238 | ) | NM | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 121 | $ | (1,246 | ) | NM | $ | 1,002 | $ | (5,194 | ) | NM | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | (6 | ) | (48 | ) | 88 | % | 10 | (48 | ) | NM | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 127 | $ | (1,198 | ) | NM | $ | 992 | $ | (5,146 | ) | NM | ||||||||
EOP assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 112 | $ | 180 | (38 | )% | ||||||||||||||
2Q10 vs. 2Q09
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $948 million, driven by an improvement in net revenue marks, partially offset by recording $176 million of negative revenues ($70 million of which were included in the net revenue marks) as a result of the reclassifying assets in held-to-maturity to fair value (see "Second Quarter 2010 Executive Summary" above and "Reclassification of Held-to-Maturity Securities to Available-for-Sale" below). Revenues in the current quarter included positive marks of $1.0 billion on subprime-related direct exposures and non-credit accretion of $383 million, partially offset by write-downs on commercial real estate of $174 million and on Alt-A mortgages of $163 million.
Operating expenses decreased 37% driven by the absence of the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, exited in the fourth quarter of 2009, and lower tax charges and compensation.
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 97%, primarily driven by lower net credit losses of $1.2 billion and a larger reserve release of $234 million.
Assets declined 38% versus the prior-year quarter due to asset sales (including approximately $8 billion primarily through CDO liquidations), amortization and prepayments, partially offset by the impact of the adoption of SFAS 166/167.
2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $7.0 billion primarily due to favorable net revenue marks relative to the prior-year period. Revenue Itemsyear-to-date includes positive marks of $1.9 billion on subprime-related direct exposures and Risk Exposurenon-credit accretion of $778 million, partially offset by write-downs on commercial real estate of $232 million and on Alt-A mortgages of $327 million.
Operating expenses decreased 38% mainly driven by lower volumes, lower transaction expenses, and the absence of the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, exited in the fourth quarter of 2009.
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 91%, primarily driven by a $2.4 billion decrease in net credit losses versus the prior-year period and higher reserve releases of $304 million.
| Pretax Revenue Marks (in millions) | Risk Exposure (in billions) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Second Quarter 2009 | Second Quarter 2008 | June 30, 2009 | Mar. 31, 2009 | % Change | |||||||||||
Private Equity and equity investments | $ | 11 | $ | (6 | ) | 1.8 | $ | 1.7 | 6 | % | ||||||
Alt-A Mortgages(1) | 99 | (48 | ) | 1.2 | 0.9 | 33 | ||||||||||
Commercial Real Estate (CRE) positions(1) | (32 | ) | (65 | ) | 7.0 | 6.2 | 13 | |||||||||
CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option | (1,452 | ) | (228 | ) | N/A | N/A | — | |||||||||
CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers | 597 | 48 | N/A | N/A | — | |||||||||||
Total significant revenue items | $ | (777 | ) | $ | (299 | ) | ||||||||||
The following table provides details of the composition ofSAP assets as of June 30, 2010.
| Assets within Special Asset Pool as of June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Carrying value of assets | Face value | Carrying value as % of face value | ||||||||
Securities in Available-for-Sale (AFS) | |||||||||||
Corporates | $ | 7.7 | $ | 7.8 | 98 | % | |||||
Prime and non-U.S. mortgage-backed securities (MBS) | 7.1 | 8.6 | 83 | ||||||||
Auction rate securities (ARS) | 6.2 | 8.6 | 72 | ||||||||
Other securities(1) | 5.3 | 7.0 | 76 | ||||||||
Alt-A mortgages | 0.6 | 1.3 | 46 | ||||||||
Total securities in AFS | $ | 27.0 | $ | 33.3 | 81 | % | |||||
Securities in Held-to-Maturity (HTM) | |||||||||||
Prime and non-U.S. MBS | $ | 8.3 | $ | 10.4 | 81 | % | |||||
Alt-A mortgages | 9.4 | 18.2 | 52 | ||||||||
Corporate securities | 6.1 | 7.0 | 87 | ||||||||
ARS | 1.0 | 1.2 | 78 | ||||||||
Other securities(2) | 3.3 | 4.3 | 76 | ||||||||
Total securities in HTM | $ | 28.1 | $ | 41.0 | 68 | % | |||||
Loans, leases and letters of credit (LCs) in Held-for-Investment (HFI)/Held-for-Sale (HFS)(3) | |||||||||||
Corporates | $ | 11.1 | $ | 12.1 | 92 | % | |||||
Commercial real estate (CRE) | 8.0 | 8.9 | 90 | ||||||||
Other | 2.1 | 2.5 | 82 | ||||||||
Loan loss reserves | (3.2 | ) | — | NM | |||||||
Total loans, leases and LCs in HFI/HFS | $ | 18.0 | $ | 23.4 | 77 | % | |||||
Mark to market | |||||||||||
Subprime securities | $ | 0.8 | $ | 4.9 | 17 | % | |||||
Other securities(4) | 5.8 | 29.5 | 20 | ||||||||
Derivatives | 7.2 | NM | NM | ||||||||
Loans, leases and letters of credit | 3.7 | 5.4 | 67 | ||||||||
Repurchase agreements | 6.2 | NM | NM | ||||||||
Total mark-to-market | $ | 23.7 | NM | NM | |||||||
Highly leveraged finance commitments | $ | 2.0 | $ | 3.2 | 62 | % | |||||
Equities (excludes ARS in AFS) | 5.9 | NM | NM | ||||||||
Monolines | 0.4 | NM | NM | ||||||||
Consumer and other(5) | 6.7 | NM | NM | ||||||||
Total | $ | 111.7 | |||||||||
Notes: Assets previously held by the Citi-advised SIVs have been allocated to the corresponding asset categories above.SAP had total CRE assets of $11.3 billion at June 30, 2010.
Excludes Discontinued Operations.
Totals may not sum due to rounding.
NM Not meaningful
Items Impacting SAP Revenues
The table below provides additional information regarding the net revenue marks affecting theSAP during the second quarters of 2010 and 2009.
| Pretax revenue | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Second Quarter 2010 | Second Quarter 2009 | |||||
Subprime-related direct exposures(1) | $ | 1,046 | $ | 613 | |||
CVA related to exposure to monoline insurers | 35 | 157 | |||||
Alt-A mortgages(2)(3) | (163 | ) | (390 | ) | |||
CRE positions(2)(4) | (174 | ) | (213 | ) | |||
CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers(2) | (54 | ) | 219 | ||||
SIV assets | (123 | ) | 50 | ||||
Private equity and equity investments | 31 | (73 | ) | ||||
Highly leveraged loans and financing commitments(5) | — | (237 | ) | ||||
ARS proprietary positions(6) | (8 | ) | — | ||||
CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option | 8 | (156 | ) | ||||
Subtotal | $ | 598 | $ | (31 | ) | ||
Accretion on reclassified assets(7) | 383 | 501 | |||||
Total selected revenue items | $ | 981 | $ | 470 | |||
Private Equity and Equity Investments
In the second quarter
Alt-A Mortgage Securities
In the second quarter of 2009, Citigroup recorded pretax gains of approximately $99 million, net of hedges, on Alt-A mortgage securities held in Citicorp. hedges.
Citicorp had $1.2 billion in Alt-A mortgage securities at June 30, 2009, which increased $0.3 billion from March 31, 2009. Of the $1.2 billion, approximately $0.7 billion was classified asTrading account assets and $0.5 billion was classified as available-for-sale investments.
Commercial Real Estate
Citicorp's commercial real estate (CRE) exposure is split into three categories: assets held at fair value; held to maturity/held for investment; and equity. During the second quarter of 2009, pretax losses of $32 million, net of hedges, were booked on exposures recorded at fair value. Citicorp had $7.0 billion in
Credit Valuation Adjustment on Citi's Debt Liabilities for Which Citi Has Elected the Fair Value Option
Under SFAS 157 (ASC 820-10-35-18), the Company is required to use its own credit spreads in determining the current value for its derivative liabilities and all other liabilities for which it has elected the fair value option. When Citi's credit spreads widen (deteriorate), Citi recognizes a gain on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has decreased. When Citi's credit spreads narrow (improve), Citi recognizes a loss on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has increased.
During the second quarter of 2009, Citicorp recorded losses of approximately $1,452 million on its fair value option liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) principally due to narrowing (improving) of the Company's credit spreads.
Credit Valuation Adjustment on Derivative Positions, excluding Monoline insurers
During the second quarter of 2009, Citicorp recorded pretax net gain of approximately $597 million on its derivative positions due to the narrowing of the credit default swap spreads of the Company's counterparties on its derivativeSIV assets. A majority of the gains were offset by losses due to narrowing in the Company's own credit spreads on the Company's derivative liabilities. See "Derivatives" below for a further discussion.
See, generally, "Managing Global Risk" below for additional information on the risk exposures discussed above.
ITEMS IMPACTING CITI HOLDINGS
Citi Holdings Significant Revenue Items and Risk Exposure Predominantly in Special Asset Pool
| Pretax Revenue (in millions) | Risk Exposure (in billions) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Second Quarter 2009 | Second Quarter 2008 | June 30, 2009 | Mar. 31, 2009 | % Change | |||||||||||
Sub-prime related direct exposures | $ | 613 | $ | (3,395 | ) | $ | 9.6 | $ | 10.2 | (6 | )% | |||||
Private Equity and equity investments | (37 | ) | 183 | 6.2 | 6.0 | 3 | ||||||||||
Alt-A Mortgages(1) | (390 | ) | (277 | ) | 10.0 | 11.6 | (14 | ) | ||||||||
Highly leveraged loans and financing commitments(2) | (237 | ) | (428 | ) | 8.5 | 9.5 | (11 | ) | ||||||||
Commercial Real Estate (CRE) positions(1)(3) | (354 | ) | (480 | ) | 28.6 | 29.9 | (4 | ) | ||||||||
Structured Investment Vehicles' (SIVs) Assets | 50 | 11 | 16.2 | 16.2 | — | |||||||||||
Auction Rate Securities (ARS) proprietary positions | — | 197 | 8.3 | 8.5 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
CVA related to exposure to monoline insurers | 157 | (2,428 | ) | N/A | N/A | — | ||||||||||
CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option | (156 | ) | — | N/A | N/A | — | ||||||||||
CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers | 804 | 52 | N/A | N/A | — | |||||||||||
Subtotal | $ | 450 | $ | (6,565 | ) | |||||||||||
Accretion on reclassified assets | 501 | — | ||||||||||||||
Total significant revenue items | $ | 951 | $ | (6,565 | ) | |||||||||||
Subprime-Related Direct Exposures
In the second quarterwrite-downs of 2009, Citi Holdings recorded gains of approximately $613 million, net of hedges, on its subprime-related direct exposures. The Company's remaining $9.6 billion in U.S. subprime net direct exposure in Citi Holdings at June 30, 2009 consisted of (i) approximately $8.3 billion of net exposures to the super senior tranches of CDOs, which are collateralized by asset-backed securities, derivatives on asset-backed securities or both, and (ii) approximately $1.4 billion of subprime-related exposures in its lending and structuring business. See "U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposures" below for a further discussion of such exposures and the associated marks recorded.
Private Equity and Equity Investments
In the second quarter of 2009, Citi Holdings recognized pretax losses of approximately $37 million on private equity and equity investments. Citi Holdings had $6.2 billion in private equity and equity investments securities at June 30, 2009, which increased approximately $150 million from March 31, 2009.
Alt-A Mortgage Securities
In the second quarter of 2009, Citigroup recorded pretax losses of approximately $390 million, net of hedges, on Alt-A mortgage securities held in Citi Holdings. For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) where (i) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (ii) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral composed of full documentation loans.
Citi Holdings had $10.0 billion in Alt-A mortgage securities at June 30 2009, which decreased $1.6 billion from March 31, 2009. Of the $10.0 billion, approximately $0.4 billion was classified asTrading account assets, on which $29 million of fair value losses, net of hedging, was recorded in earnings, $0.1 billion was classified as available-for-sale (AFS) investments, and $9.5 billion was classified as held-to-maturity (HTM) investments. HTM securities decreased $1.1 billion from March 31, 2009, due to principal pay-downs and impairments recognized during the quarter.
Highly Leveraged Loans and Financing Commitments
The Company recorded pretax losses of approximately $237 million on funded and unfunded highly leveraged finance exposures in the second quarter of 2009. Citigroup's exposure to highly leveraged financings totaled $8.5 billion at June 30, 2009 (approximately $8.1 billion in funded and $0.4 billion in unfunded commitments), reflecting a decrease of approximately $1.0 billion from March 31, 2009. See "Highly Leveraged Financing Transactions" below for a further discussion.
Commercial Real Estate
Citi Holdings' commercial real estate (CRE) exposure is split into three categories: assets held at fair value; held to maturity/held for investment; and equity. During the second quarter of 2009, pretax losses of $213 million, net of hedges, were booked on exposures recorded at fair value, $135 million of losses were booked on equity method investments, and $6 million of impairments were booked on HTM positions. Citi Holdings had $28.6 billion in CRE positions at June 30, 2009, which decreased $1.3 billion from March 31, 2009. See "Exposure to Commercial Real Estate" below for a further discussion.
Monoline Insurers Credit Valuation Adjustment
During the second quarter of 2009, Citi Holdings recorded a pretax gain on credit value adjustments (CVA) of approximately $157 million on its exposure to monoline insurers. CVA is calculated by applying forward default
probabilities, which are derived using the counterparty's current credit spread, to the expected exposure profile. The exposure primarily relates to hedges on super senior subprime exposures that were executed with various monoline insurance companies. See "Direct Exposure to Monolines" below for a further discussion.
Credit Valuation Adjustment on Citi's Debt Liabilities for Which Citi Has Elected the Fair Value Option
Under SFAS 157 (ASC 820-10-35-18), the Company is required to use its own credit spreads in determining the current value for its derivative liabilities and all other liabilities for which it has elected the fair value option. When Citi's credit spreads widen (deteriorate), Citi recognizes a gain on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has decreased. When Citi's credit spreads narrow (improve), Citi recognizes a loss on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has increased.
During the second quarter of 2009, Citi Holdings recorded a loss of approximately $156 million on its fair value option liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) due to the narrowing of the Company's credit spreads.
Credit Valuation Adjustment on Derivative Positions, excluding Monoline insurers
During the second quarter of 2009, Citi Holdings recorded a net gain of approximately $804 million on its derivative positions primarily due to the narrowing of the credit default swap spreads of the Company's counterparties on its derivative assets. See "Derivatives" below for a further discussion.
Accretion on Reclassified Assets
In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company reclassified $33.3 billion of debt securities from trading securities to HTM investments, $4.7 billion of debt securities from trading securities to AFS, and $15.7 billion of loans from held-for-sale to held-for-investment. All assets were reclassified with an amortized cost equal to the fair value on the date of reclassification. The difference between the amortized cost basis and the expected principal cash flows is treated as a purchase discount and accreted into income over the remaining life of the security or loan. In the second quarter of 2009, the Company recognized approximately $501 million of interest revenue from this accretion.
See, generally, "Managing Global Risk" below for additional information on the risk exposures discussed above.
DIVESTITURES
Joint Venture with Morgan Stanley
Pursuant to a previously disclosed agreement, on June 1, 2009, Citi and Morgan Stanley established a joint venture (JV) that combines the Global Wealth Management platform of Morgan Stanley with Citi's Smith Barney, Quilter and Australia private client networks. Citi sold 100% of these businesses to Morgan Stanley in exchange for a 49% stake in the JV and an upfront cash payment of $2.75 billion. The Brokerage and Asset Management business recorded a pretax gain of approximately $11.1 billion ($6.7 billion after-tax) on this sale. Both Morgan Stanley and Citi will access the JV for retail distribution and each firm's institutional businesses will continue to execute order flow from the JV.
In addition, as previously disclosed, on August 1, 2009, Citi sold its managed futures business to the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney JV. This sale will result in an after-tax gain of approximately $160 million in the third quarter of 2009 and will not impact Citi's 49% ownership stake in the JV.
Sale of Nikko Cordial Securities
On May 1, 2009, Citigroup entered into a definitive agreement to sell its Japanese domestic securities business, conducted principally through Nikko Cordial Securities Inc., to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation in a transaction with a total cash value to Citi of approximately $7.9 billion (¥774.5 billion). Citi's ownership interests in Nikko Citigroup Limited, Nikko Asset Management Co., Ltd., and Nikko Principal Investments Japan Ltd. were not included in the transaction. Citi expects to recognize an immaterial after-tax gain on the transaction when the transaction closes. The transaction is expected to close by the end of the fourth quarter of 2009, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. The results of Nikko Cordial are reflected as Discontinued Operations in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
Sale of NikkoCiti Trust
On July 1, 2009, Citigroup entered into a definitive agreement to sell all of the shares of NikkoCiti Trust and Banking Corporation (NCT) to Nomura Trust & Banking Co., Ltd. for an all cash consideration of $197 million, subject to certain closing purchase price adjustments. The sale is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2009, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions.
OTHER ITEMS
Income Taxes
The Company's effective tax rate on continuing operations was 17.1% in the second quarter of 2009 versus 51.2% in the prior-year period. The current quarter includes a tax benefit of $129 million in continuing operations (plus $34 million in discontinued operations) relating to the conclusion of an audit of various issues in the Company's 2003-2005 U.S. federal tax audit. The Company expects to conclude the audit of its U.S. federal consolidated income tax returns for the years 2003-2005 within the next 12 months. The gross uncertain tax position at June 30, 2009 for the items expected to be resolved is approximately $85 million plus gross interest of approximately $8 million. The potential net tax benefit to continuing operations could be approximately $90 million. This is in addition to the $110$2 million and $163 million benefits booked in the first and second quarters of 2009, respectively, for issues already resolved.
The Company's net deferred tax asset of $41.6 billion at June 30, 2009 decreased by approximately $2.9 billion from December 31, 2008. The principal items reducing the deferred tax asset were approximately $1.4 billion due to an increase in other comprehensive income and approximately $1.2 billion in compensation tax benefits under SFAS 123(R)(ASC 718-740) which reducedadditional paid-in capital in 2009. Although realization is not assured, the Company believes that the realization of the recognized net deferred tax asset at June 30, 2009 is more likely than not based upon expectations of future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which it operates and available tax planning strategies.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Public and Private Exchange Offers
On July 23, 2009 and July 29, 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with the private and public holders of preferred stock and trust preferred securities, as applicable ($32.8 billion in aggregate liquidation value). In connection with these exchanges, the U.S. Treasury also exchanged $25 billion of aggregate liquidation value of its preferred stock, for a total exchange of $57.8 billion. See "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above.
Sale of Nikko Asset Management
On July 30, 2009, Citigroup entered into a definitive agreement to sell its entire ownership interest in Nikko Asset Management to The Sumitomo Trust and Banking Co., Ltd. for an all-cash consideration of approximately $795 million (¥75.6 billion). The sale is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2009, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions, and is not expected to have a material impact on Citi's net income.
As required by SFAS 165, Subsequent Events, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through August 7, 2009, which is the date its Consolidated Financial Statements were issued.
ACCOUNTING CHANGES AND FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of "Accounting Changes" and "Future Application of Accounting Standards."
SEGMENT, BUSINESS AND PRODUCT INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES
The following tables show the income (loss) and revenues for Citigroup on a segment, business and product view:
Citigroup Income (Loss)
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
Income from Continuing Operations | |||||||||||||||||||||
CITICORP | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regional Consumer Banking | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 169 | NM | $ | 182 | $ | 514 | (65 | )% | |||||||||
EMEA | (110 | ) | 37 | NM | (143 | ) | 56 | NM | |||||||||||||
Latin America | 70 | 334 | (79 | )% | 239 | 765 | (69 | ) | |||||||||||||
Asia | 272 | 451 | (40 | ) | 523 | 987 | (47 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 217 | $ | 991 | (78 | )% | $ | 801 | $ | 2,322 | (66 | )% | |||||||||
Securities and Banking | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 3 | $ | 646 | (100 | )% | $ | 2,570 | $ | 2,028 | 27 | % | |||||||||
EMEA | 746 | 376 | 98 | 2,918 | 572 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Latin America | 522 | 325 | 61 | 921 | 626 | 47 | |||||||||||||||
Asia | 596 | 306 | 95 | 1,652 | 933 | 77 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,867 | $ | 1,653 | 13 | % | $ | 8,061 | $ | 4,159 | 94 | % | |||||||||
Transaction Services | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 181 | $ | 61 | NM | $ | 319 | $ | 149 | NM | |||||||||||
EMEA | 350 | 299 | 17 | % | 676 | 577 | 17 | % | |||||||||||||
Latin America | 150 | 151 | (1 | ) | 310 | 292 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
Asia | 293 | 278 | 5 | 573 | 582 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 974 | $ | 789 | 23 | % | $ | 1,878 | $ | 1,600 | 17 | % | |||||||||
Institutional Clients Group | $ | 2,841 | $ | 2,442 | 16 | % | $ | 9,939 | $ | 5,759 | 73 | % | |||||||||
Total Citicorp | $ | 3,058 | $ | 3,433 | (11 | )% | $ | 10,740 | $ | 8,081 | 33 | % | |||||||||
CITI HOLDINGS | |||||||||||||||||||||
Brokerage and Asset Management | $ | 6,814 | $ | 267 | NM | $ | 6,872 | $ | 153 | NM | |||||||||||
Local Consumer Lending | (4,193 | ) | (1,206 | ) | NM | (5,612 | ) | (1,081 | ) | NM | |||||||||||
Special Asset Pool | (1,262 | ) | (4,286 | ) | 71 | % | (5,237 | ) | (13,447 | ) | 61 | % | |||||||||
Total Citi Holdings | $ | 1,359 | $ | (5,225 | ) | NM | $ | (3,977 | ) | $ | (14,375 | ) | 72 | % | |||||||
Corporate/Other | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (537 | ) | 94 | % | $ | (682 | ) | $ | (1,221 | ) | 44 | % | |||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations | $ | 4,387 | $ | (2,329 | ) | NM | $ | 6,081 | $ | (7,515 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Discontinued Operations | $ | (142 | ) | $ | (94 | ) | $ | (259 | ) | $ | (35 | ) | |||||||||
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests | $ | (34 | ) | $ | 72 | $ | (50 | ) | $ | 56 | |||||||||||
Citigroup's Net Income (Loss) | $ | 4,279 | $ | (2,495 | ) | NM | $ | 5,872 | $ | (7,606 | ) | NM | |||||||||
NM Not meaningful
Citigroup Revenues
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
CITICORP | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regional Consumer Banking | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 1,761 | $ | 2,111 | (17 | )% | $ | 3,850 | $ | 4,445 | (13 | )% | |||||||||
EMEA | 394 | 508 | (22 | ) | 754 | 969 | (22 | ) | |||||||||||||
Latin America | 1,819 | 2,371 | (23 | ) | 3,610 | 4,606 | (22 | ) | |||||||||||||
Asia | 1,631 | 1,891 | (14 | ) | 3,162 | 3,835 | (18 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 5,605 | $ | 6,881 | (19 | )% | $ | 11,376 | $ | 13,855 | (18 | )% | |||||||||
Securities and Banking | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 1,898 | $ | 3,507 | (46 | )% | $ | 7,142 | $ | 7,099 | 1 | % | |||||||||
EMEA | 2,555 | 1,970 | 30 | 6,776 | 3,703 | 83 | |||||||||||||||
Latin America | 1,046 | 722 | 45 | 1,844 | 1,403 | 31 | |||||||||||||||
Asia | 1,373 | 1,207 | 14 | 3,534 | 2,919 | 21 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 6,872 | $ | 7,406 | (7 | )% | $ | 19,296 | $ | 15,124 | 28 | % | |||||||||
Transaction Services | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 656 | $ | 511 | 28 | % | $ | 1,245 | $ | 1,017 | 22 | % | |||||||||
EMEA | 860 | 947 | (9 | ) | 1,704 | 1,831 | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Latin America | 340 | 374 | (9 | ) | 683 | 714 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Asia | 627 | 647 | (3 | ) | 1,225 | 1,334 | (8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,483 | $ | 2,479 | — | $ | 4,857 | $ | 4,896 | (1 | )% | ||||||||||
Institutional Clients Group | $ | 9,355 | $ | 9,885 | (5 | )% | $ | 24,153 | $ | 20,020 | 21 | % | |||||||||
Total Citicorp | $ | 14,960 | $ | 16,766 | (11 | )% | $ | 35,529 | $ | 33,875 | 5 | % | |||||||||
CITI HOLDINGS | |||||||||||||||||||||
Brokerage and Asset Management | $ | 12,339 | $ | 2,467 | NM | $ | 14,040 | $ | 4,857 | NM | |||||||||||
Local Consumer Lending | 3,930 | 6,224 | (37 | )% | 10,383 | 13,724 | (24 | )% | |||||||||||||
Special Asset Pool | (519 | ) | (6,612 | ) | 92 | % | (5,221 | ) | (21,020 | ) | 75 | % | |||||||||
Total Citi Holdings | $ | 15,750 | $ | 2,079 | NM | $ | 19,202 | $ | (2,439 | ) | NM | ||||||||||
Corporate/Other | $ | (741 | ) | $ | (1,307 | ) | 43 | % | $ | (241 | ) | $ | (1,741 | ) | 86 | % | |||||
Total Net Revenues | $ | 29,969 | $ | 17,538 | 71 | % | $ | 54,490 | $ | 29,695 | 83 | % | |||||||||
NM Not meaningful
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 8,445 | $ | 8,634 | (2 | )% | $ | 16,632 | $ | 16,664 | — | ||||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 6,515 | 8,132 | (20 | ) | 18,897 | 17,211 | 10 | % | |||||||||||||
Total Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 14,960 | $ | 16,766 | (11 | )% | $ | 35,529 | $ | 33,875 | 5 | % | |||||||||
Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 1,560 | $ | 1,289 | 21 | % | $ | 2,797 | $ | 2,218 | 26 | % | |||||||||
Credit reserve build/ (release) | 1,165 | 573 | NM | 2,105 | 1,047 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | $ | 2,725 | $ | 1,862 | 46 | % | $ | 4,902 | $ | 3,265 | 50 | % | |||||||||
Provision for benefits & claims | 15 | 2 | NM | 27 | 3 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments | 83 | (75 | ) | NM | 115 | (75 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
Total provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 2,823 | $ | 1,789 | 58 | % | $ | 5,044 | $ | 3,193 | 58 | % | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 7,849 | $ | 9,900 | (21 | )% | $ | 15,046 | $ | 19,226 | (22 | )% | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 4,288 | $ | 5,077 | (16 | )% | $ | 15,439 | $ | 11,456 | 35 | % | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes | 1,230 | 1,644 | (25 | ) | 4,699 | 3,375 | 39 | ||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 3,058 | $ | 3,433 | (11 | )% | $ | 10,740 | $ | 8,081 | 33 | % | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 3 | 21 | (86 | ) | — | 34 | (100 | ) | |||||||||||||
Citicorp's net income | $ | 3,055 | $ | 3,412 | (10 | )% | $ | 10,740 | $ | 8,047 | 33 | % | |||||||||
Balance Sheet Data (in billions) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total EOP assets | $ | 985 | $ | 1,160 | (15 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Average assets | $ | 1,000 | $ | 1,307 | (23 | )% | $ | 1,019 | $ | 1,343 | (24 | )% | |||||||||
Total EOP deposits | $ | 702 | $ | 681 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||
NM Not meaningful
REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 3,903 | $ | 4,220 | (8 | )% | $ | 7,516 | $ | 8,205 | (8 | )% | ||||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 1,702 | 2,661 | (36 | ) | 3,860 | 5,650 | (32 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 5,605 | $ | 6,881 | (19 | )% | $ | 11,376 | $ | 13,855 | (18 | )% | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 3,491 | $ | 4,194 | (17 | )% | $ | 6,797 | $ | 7,976 | (15 | )% | ||||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 1,392 | $ | 981 | 42 | % | $ | 2,552 | $ | 1,844 | 38 | % | ||||||||||
Credit reserve build/ (release) | 592 | 382 | 55 | 1,256 | 832 | 51 | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for benefits & claims | 15 | 2 | NM | 27 | 3 | NM | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 1,999 | $ | 1,365 | 46 | % | $ | 3,835 | $ | 2,679 | 43 | % | ||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 115 | $ | 1,322 | (91 | )% | $ | 744 | $ | 3,200 | (77 | )% | ||||||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (102 | ) | 331 | NM | (57 | ) | 878 | NM | ||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 217 | $ | 991 | (78 | )% | $ | 801 | $ | 2,322 | (66 | )% | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | 4 | (100 | ) | — | 5 | (100 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 217 | $ | 987 | (78 | )% | $ | 801 | $ | 2,317 | (65 | )% | ||||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 191 | $ | 230 | (17 | )% | $ | 187 | $ | 227 | (18 | )% | ||||||||||
Return on assets | 0.46 | % | 1.73 | % | 0.86 | % | 2.05 | % | ||||||||||||||
Average deposits(in billions of dollars) | $ | 268 | $ | 272 | (1 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
Net credit losses as a % of average loans | 4.78 | % | 2.99 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenue by business | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail Banking | $ | 3,193 | $ | 3,577 | (11 | )% | $ | 6,148 | $ | 7,028 | (13 | )% | ||||||||||
Citi-Branded Cards | 2,412 | 3,304 | (27 | ) | 5,228 | 6,827 | (23 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 5,605 | $ | 6,881 | (19 | )% | $ | 11,376 | $ | 13,855 | (18 | )% | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations by business | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Retail Banking | $ | 428 | $ | 563 | (24 | )% | $ | 871 | $ | 1,263 | (31 | )% | ||||||||||
Citi-Branded Cards | (211 | ) | 428 | NM | (70 | ) | 1,059 | NM | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 217 | $ | 991 | (78 | )% | $ | 801 | $ | 2,322 | (66 | )% | ||||||||||
NM Not meaningful
NORTH AMERICA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 1,150 | $ | 887 | 30 | % | $ | 2,170 | $ | 1,695 | 28 | % | |||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 611 | 1,224 | (50 | ) | 1,680 | 2,750 | (39 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 1,761 | $ | 2,111 | (17 | )% | $ | 3,850 | $ | 4,445 | (13 | )% | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | 1,337 | $ | 1,590 | (16 | )% | $ | 2,692 | $ | 3,063 | (12 | )% | ||||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 305 | $ | 136 | NM | $ | 563 | $ | 281 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
Credit reserve build/(release) | 130 | 126 | 3 | % | 372 | 295 | 26 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for benefits and claims | 15 | 2 | NM | 27 | 2 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 450 | $ | 264 | 70 | % | $ | 962 | $ | 578 | 66 | % | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes | $ | (26 | ) | $ | 257 | NM | $ | 196 | $ | 804 | (76 | )% | |||||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (11 | ) | 88 | NM | 14 | 290 | (95 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 169 | NM | $ | 182 | $ | 514 | (65 | )% | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 169 | NM | $ | 182 | $ | 514 | (65 | )% | |||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 33 | $ | 38 | (13 | )% | $ | 33 | $ | 39 | (15 | )% | |||||||||
Return on assets | (0.18 | )% | 1.79 | % | 1.11 | % | 2.65 | % | |||||||||||||
Average deposits(in billions of dollars) | $ | 136 | $ | 122 | 11 | % | |||||||||||||||
Net credit losses as a % of average loans | 6.51 | % | 3.42 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Revenue by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 955 | $ | 952 | — | $ | 1,837 | $ | 1,802 | 2 | % | ||||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 806 | 1,159 | (30 | )% | 2,013 | 2,643 | (24 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,761 | $ | 2,111 | (17 | )% | $ | 3,850 | $ | 4,445 | (13 | )% | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 88 | $ | 60 | 47 | % | $ | 169 | $ | 62 | NM | ||||||||||
Citi-branded cards | (103 | ) | 109 | NM | 13 | 452 | (97 | )% | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 169 | NM | $ | 182 | $ | 514 | (65 | )% | |||||||||
NM Not meaningful
2Q09 vs. 2Q08
Revenues, net of interest expense declined 17%, primarily reflecting higher credit losses flowing through the credit card securitization trusts.Net interest revenue was up 30% driven by higher net interest margin in cards as a result of higher interest revenue from pricing actions and lower funding costs, and by the impact of higher deposit and loan volumes in retail banking. Average deposits were 11% higher than the prior year, driven by growth in consumer CDs and commercial deposits.Non-interest revenue declined 50%, primarily driven by higher credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts partially offset by other securitization revenue, and by the absence of a prior-year $170 million gain on a cards portfolio sale.
Operating expenses declined 16%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts, lower marketing costs, and the absence of a $55 million repositioning charge in the second quarter of 2008.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 70% primarily due to rising net credit losses in both cards and retail banking. The $130 million loan loss reserve build in the second quarter reflected the continued weakness in consumer credit. The cards net credit loss ratio increased 400 basis points to 7.51%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio increased 174 basis points to 4.85%.
2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense declined 13%, primarily reflecting higher credit losses flowing through the credit card securitization trusts.Net interest revenue was up 28% driven by the impact of pricing actions and lower funding costs in cards, and by higher deposit and loan volumes in retail banking, with average deposits up 8% from the prior-year period.Non-interest revenue declined 39%, driven by higher credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts partially offset by other securitization revenue, and by the absence of a $349 million gain on the sale of Visa shares and a $170 million gain on a cards portfolio sale in the prior-year period.
Operating expenses declined 12%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts, lower marketing costs, and the absence of $120 million of repositioning charges in the prior-year period, which were partially offset by the absence of a prior-year $159 million Visa litigation reserve release.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 66% primarily due to rising net credit losses in both cards and retail banking. Continued weakness in consumer credit and trends in the macro-economic environment,
including rising unemployment and higher bankruptcy filings, drove higher credit costs. The cards net credit loss ratio increased 330 basis points to 6.61%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio increased 39 basis points to 4.06%.
Recent Legislative Actions
The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009
On May 22, 2009, The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act) was enacted into law. The CARD Act will affect various credit card practices of card issuers, including Citigroup, such as marketing, underwriting, pricing, billing and disclosure requirements, thus reshaping the way consumers have access to and use their credit cards. Many of the provisions in the CARD Act will take effect in February 2010, although some take effect earlier in August 2009 and some later in August 2010.
Among other things, the CARD Act:
Certain provisions of the CARD Act are consistent with Citigroup's existing practices and will not require any changes or modifications. Other provisions, however, such as those that restrict the ability of an issuer to increase APRs on outstanding balances or that establish standards for penalty fees and payment allocation will require Citigroup to make fundamental changes to its credit card business model. The impact of the CARD Act on Citigroup's credit businesses is not fully known at this time. Such impact will ultimately depend upon the successful implementation of changes to Citigroup's business model and the continued regulatory interpretations of the CARD Act, among other considerations.
Mortgage Modification Programs
See "Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending" below for a description of the Obama administration's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) and Citigroup's mortgage modification programs generally.
EMEA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 243 | $ | 335 | (27 | )% | $ | 467 | $ | 634 | (26 | )% | |||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 151 | 173 | (13 | ) | 287 | 335 | (14 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 394 | $ | 508 | (22 | )% | $ | 754 | $ | 969 | (22 | )% | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 282 | $ | 395 | (29 | )% | $ | 538 | $ | 770 | (30 | )% | |||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 121 | $ | 48 | NM | $ | 210 | $ | 95 | NM | |||||||||||
Credit reserve build/(release) | 158 | 15 | NM | 230 | 31 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 279 | $ | 63 | NM | $ | 440 | $ | 126 | NM | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes | $ | (167 | ) | $ | 50 | NM | $ | (224 | ) | $ | 73 | NM | |||||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (57 | ) | 13 | NM | (81 | ) | 17 | NM | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | (110 | ) | $ | 37 | NM | $ | (143 | ) | $ | 56 | NM | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | 4 | (100 | )% | — | 6 | (100 | )% | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | (110 | ) | $ | 33 | NM | $ | (143 | ) | $ | 50 | NM | |||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 11 | $ | 14 | (21 | )% | $ | 11 | $ | 14 | (21 | )% | |||||||||
Return on assets | (4.01 | )% | 0.95 | % | (2.62 | )% | 0.72 | % | |||||||||||||
Average deposits(in billions of dollars) | $ | 9 | $ | 12 | (25 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Net credit losses as a % of average loans | 5.78 | % | 1.91 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Revenue by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 234 | $ | 325 | (28 | )% | $ | 439 | $ | 621 | (29 | )% | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 160 | 183 | (13 | ) | 315 | 348 | (9 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 394 | $ | 508 | (22 | )% | $ | 754 | $ | 969 | (22 | )% | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | (76 | ) | $ | 6 | NM | $ | (117 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | NM | ||||||||
Citi-branded cards | (34 | ) | 31 | NM | (26 | ) | 58 | NM | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | (110 | ) | $ | 37 | NM | $ | (143 | ) | $ | 56 | NM | |||||||||
NM Not meaningful
2Q09 vs. 2Q08
Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 22%. More than half of the revenue decline is attributable to changes in foreign currency translation (generally referred to throughout this report as "FX translation"). Other drivers included lower wealth management and lending revenues due to lower volumes and spread compression. Investment sales and assets under management declined by 38% and 32%, respectively.Net interest revenue was 27% lower than the prior-year period with average loans for retail banking down 22% as a result of a lower risk profile, branch closures, and the impact of FX translation. Average deposits were down 25%, primarily due to FX translation. Retail banking net interest margin declined from 11.0% to 9.8%.Non-interest revenue declined 13%, primarily due to the impact of FX translation.
Operating expenses declined 29%, reflecting expense control actions, lower marketing expenditure, and the impact of FX translation. Cost savings were achieved by branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering efforts.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $216 million, to $279$3 million in the second quarter of 2009. Net credit losses increased2010 and 2009, respectively, from $48 million to $121 million, while the loan loss reserve build increased from $15 million to $158 million. Higher credit costs reflected continued credit deterioration, particularly in UAE, Turkey, Poland and Russia.
2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD
Revenues, netbuy-backs of interest expense, declined 22%. Over half of the revenue decline is attributable to the impact of FX translation. Other drivers included lower wealth management and lending revenues due to lower volumes and spread compression. Investment sales and assets under management declined by 47% and 32%, respectively.Net interest revenue was 26% lower than the prior year with average loans for retail banking down 21%, average deposits down 25%, and net interest margin decreasing as well.Non-interest revenue declined 14%, primarily due to the impact of FX translation.
Operating expenses declined 30%, reflecting expense control actions, lower marketing spend, and the impact of FX translation. Cost savings were achieved by branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering efforts.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $314 million, to $440 million for during the first six months of 2009. Net credit losses increased from $95 million to $210 million, while the loan loss reserve build increased from $31 million to $230 million. Higher credit costs reflected continued credit deterioration across the region.
LATIN AMERICA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 1,350 | $ | 1,741 | (22 | )% | $ | 2,601 | $ | 3,377 | (23 | )% | |||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 469 | 630 | (26 | ) | 1,009 | 1,229 | (18 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 1,819 | $ | 2,371 | (23 | )% | $ | 3,610 | $ | 4,606 | (22 | )% | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 1,039 | $ | 1,238 | (16 | )% | $ | 1,950 | $ | 2,183 | (11 | )% | |||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 612 | $ | 555 | 10 | % | $ | 1,153 | $ | 1,021 | 13 | % | |||||||||
Credit reserve build/(release) | 154 | 157 | (2 | ) | 320 | 394 | (19 | ) | |||||||||||||
Provision for benefits and claims | — | — | — | — | 1 | (100 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 766 | $ | 712 | 8 | % | $ | 1,473 | $ | 1,416 | 4 | % | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 14 | $ | 421 | (97 | )% | $ | 187 | $ | 1,007 | (81 | )% | |||||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (56 | ) | 87 | NM | (52 | ) | 242 | NM | |||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 70 | $ | 334 | (79 | )% | $ | 239 | $ | 765 | (69 | )% | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 70 | $ | 334 | (79 | )% | $ | 239 | $ | 765 | (69 | )% | |||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 61 | $ | 80 | (24 | )% | $ | 59 | $ | 77 | (23 | )% | |||||||||
Return on assets | 0.46 | % | 1.68 | % | 0.82 | % | 2.00 | % | |||||||||||||
Average deposits(in billions of dollars) | $ | 36 | $ | 42 | (14 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Net credit losses as a % of average loans | 8.83 | % | 6.91 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Revenue by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 981 | $ | 1,060 | (7 | )% | $ | 1,874 | $ | 2,113 | (11 | )% | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 838 | 1,311 | (36 | ) | 1,736 | 2,493 | (30 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,819 | $ | 2,371 | (23 | )% | $ | 3,610 | $ | 4,606 | (22 | )% | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 150 | $ | 149 | 1 | % | $ | 330 | $ | 461 | (28 | )% | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | (80 | ) | 185 | NM | (91 | ) | 304 | NM | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 70 | $ | 334 | (79 | )% | $ | 239 | $ | 765 | (69 | )% | |||||||||
NM Not meaningful
2Q09 vs. 2Q08
Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 23%, mainly due to the impact of FX translation, lower cards receivables and spread compression, partially offset by higher business volumes in retail banking.Net interest revenue was 22% lower than the prior year caused by the decrease in cards receivables as well as lower spreads resulting from a lower risk profile, partially offset by higher business volumes in retail banking. Average deposits were down 14%, due primarily to the impact of FX translation.Non-interest revenue declined 26%, primarily due to the decline in cards fees as well as the impact of FX translation.
Operating expenses declined 16%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and the impact of FX translation.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 8% as a result of continued losses, especially in the cards business, which were partially offset by the impact of FX translation. Cards net credit loss rates increased from 11.4% to 16.2%. Rising losses were particularly apparent in the Mexico cards portfolio.
2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 22% driven by the impact of FX translation, lower volumes and spread compression in the cards business.Net interest revenue was 23% lower than the prior year with average credit cards loans down 23%, and net interest margin decreasing as well due to the cards spread compression impact.Non-interest revenue declined 18%, primarily due to the decline in cards fees as well as the impact of FX translation.
Operating expenses declined 11%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and the impact of FX translation. The prior-year period also included a $257 million expense benefit related to a legal vehicle restructuring in Mexico.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 4% as result of deteriorating credit conditions, especially in the cards business, which were partially offset by the impact of FX translation. Cards net credit loss rates increased from 10.9% to 16.1%. Credit deterioration was particularly apparent in the Mexico cards portfolio.
ASIA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 1,160 | $ | 1,257 | (8 | )% | $ | 2,278 | $ | 2,499 | (9 | )% | |||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 471 | 634 | (26 | ) | 884 | 1,336 | (34 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 1,631 | $ | 1,891 | (14 | )% | $ | 3,162 | $ | 3,835 | (18 | )% | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 833 | $ | 971 | (14 | )% | $ | 1,617 | $ | 1,960 | (18 | )% | |||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 354 | $ | 242 | 46 | % | $ | 626 | $ | 447 | 40 | % | |||||||||
Credit reserve build/(release) | 150 | 84 | 79 | 334 | 112 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 504 | $ | 326 | 55 | % | $ | 960 | $ | 559 | 72 | % | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 294 | $ | 594 | (51 | )% | $ | 585 | $ | 1,316 | (56 | )% | |||||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | 22 | 143 | (85 | ) | 62 | 329 | (81 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 272 | $ | 451 | (40 | )% | $ | 523 | $ | 987 | (47 | )% | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | — | (1 | ) | 100 | ||||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 272 | $ | 451 | (40 | )% | $ | 523 | $ | 988 | (47 | )% | |||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 86 | $ | 98 | (12 | )% | $ | 85 | $ | 97 | (12 | )% | |||||||||
Return on assets | 1.27 | % | 1.85 | % | 1.24 | % | 2.05 | % | |||||||||||||
Average deposits(in billions of dollars) | $ | 88 | $ | 97 | (9 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Net credit losses as a % of average loans | 2.30 | % | 1.32 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Revenue by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 1,023 | $ | 1,240 | (18 | )% | $ | 1,998 | $ | 2,492 | (20 | )% | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 608 | 651 | (7 | ) | 1,164 | 1,343 | (13 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,631 | $ | 1,891 | (14 | )% | $ | 3,162 | $ | 3,835 | (18 | )% | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations by business | |||||||||||||||||||||
Retail banking | $ | 266 | $ | 348 | (24 | )% | $ | 489 | $ | 742 | (34 | )% | |||||||||
Citi-branded cards | 6 | 103 | (94 | ) | 34 | 245 | (86 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 272 | $ | 451 | (40 | )% | $ | 523 | $ | 987 | (47 | )% | |||||||||
NM Not meaningful
2Q09 vs. 2Q08
Revenue, net of interest expense declined 14% driven by a 35% decline in investment sales and the impact of FX translation.Net interest revenue was 8% lower than the prior-year period. Average loans and deposits were down 16% and 9%, respectively, and net interest margin decreased as well, in each case primarily due to the impact of FX translation.Non-interest revenue declined 26%, primarily due to the decline in investment sales.
Operating expenses declined 14%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and the impact of FX translation.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 55% mainly due to deteriorating credit conditions, partially offset by FX translation. Rising losses were particularly apparent in the card portfolios in India and Korea.
2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD
Revenue, net of interest expense declined 18% driven by a 51% decline in investment sales and the impact of FX translation.Net interest revenue was 9% lower than the prior-year period. Average loans were down 17% and deposits were down 13%, respectively, and net interest margin decreased as well.Non-interest revenue declined 34%, primarily due to the decline in investment sales.
Operating expenses declined 18%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and the impact of FX translation.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 72% mainly due to higher net credit losses in India and Korea.
INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS GROUP (ICG)
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
Commissions and Fees | $ | 466 | $ | 690 | (32 | )% | $ | 884 | $ | 1,429 | (38 | )% | |||||||||
Administration and Other Fiduciary Fees | 1,262 | 1,433 | (12 | ) | 2,510 | 2,833 | (11 | ) | |||||||||||||
Investment banking | 1,242 | 1,396 | (11 | ) | 2,182 | 2,265 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Principal transactions | 1,081 | 1,954 | (45 | ) | 8,231 | 4,958 | 66 | ||||||||||||||
Other | 762 | (2 | ) | NM | 1,230 | 76 | NM | ||||||||||||||
Total non-interest revenue | $ | 4,813 | $ | 5,471 | (12 | )% | $ | 15,037 | $ | 11,561 | 30 | % | |||||||||
Net interest revenue (including dividends) | 4,542 | 4,414 | 3 | 9,116 | 8,459 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expenses | $ | 9,355 | $ | 9,885 | (5 | )% | $ | 24,153 | $ | 20,020 | 21 | % | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | 4,358 | 5,706 | (24 | ) | 8,249 | 11,250 | (27 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net credit losses | 168 | 308 | (45 | ) | 245 | 374 | (34 | ) | |||||||||||||
Provisions for unfunded lending commitments | 83 | (75 | ) | NM | 115 | (75 | ) | NM | |||||||||||||
Credit reserve build/ (release) | 573 | 191 | NM | 849 | 215 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | $ | 824 | $ | 424 | 94 | % | $ | 1,209 | $ | 514 | NM | ||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 4,173 | $ | 3,755 | 11 | % | $ | 14,695 | $ | 8,256 | 78 | % | |||||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | 1,332 | 1,313 | 1 | 4,756 | 2,497 | 90 | |||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 2,841 | $ | 2,442 | 16 | % | $ | 9,939 | $ | 5,759 | 73 | % | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 3 | 17 | (82 | ) | — | 29 | (100 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 2,838 | $ | 2,425 | 17 | % | $ | 9,939 | $ | 5,730 | 73 | % | |||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 809 | $ | 1,077 | (25 | %) | $ | 832 | $ | 1,117 | (26 | )% | |||||||||
Return on assets | 1.41 | % | 0.91 | % | 2.41 | % | 1.03 | % | |||||||||||||
Revenue by region: | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 2,554 | $ | 4,018 | (36 | )% | $ | 8,387 | $ | 8,116 | 3 | % | |||||||||
EMEA | 3,415 | 2,917 | 17 | 8,480 | 5,534 | 53 | |||||||||||||||
Latin America | 1,386 | 1,096 | 26 | 2,527 | 2,117 | 19 | |||||||||||||||
Asia | 2,000 | 1,854 | 8 | 4,759 | 4,253 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 9,355 | $ | 9,885 | (5 | )% | $ | 24,153 | $ | 20,020 | 21 | % | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations by region: | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 184 | $ | 707 | (74 | )% | $ | 2,889 | $ | 2,177 | 33 | % | |||||||||
EMEA | 1,096 | 675 | 62 | 3,594 | 1,149 | NM | |||||||||||||||
Latin America | 672 | 476 | 41 | 1,231 | 918 | 34 | |||||||||||||||
Asia | 889 | 584 | 52 | 2,225 | 1,515 | 47 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 2,841 | $ | 2,442 | 16 | % | $ | 9,939 | $ | 5,759 | 73 | % | |||||||||
Average loans by region(in billions): | |||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 43 | $ | 48 | (10 | )% | |||||||||||||||
EMEA | 47 | 54 | (13 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Latin America | 20 | 25 | (20 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Asia | 28 | 37 | (24 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 138 | $ | 164 | (16 | )% | |||||||||||||||
NM Not meaningful
SECURITIES AND BANKING
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 3,087 | $ | 3,100 | — | $ | 6,255 | $ | 5,850 | 7 | % | |||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 3,785 | 4,306 | (12 | )% | 13,041 | 9,274 | 41 | |||||||||||||
Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 6,872 | $ | 7,406 | (7 | )% | $ | 19,296 | $ | 15,124 | 28 | % | ||||||||
Operating expenses | 3,270 | 4,371 | (25 | ) | 6,087 | 8,655 | (30 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net credit losses | 171 | 305 | (44 | ) | 245 | 370 | (34 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments | 83 | (75 | ) | NM | 115 | (75 | ) | NM | ||||||||||||
Credit reserve build (release) | 565 | 183 | NM | 843 | 206 | NM | ||||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | 819 | 413 | 98 | 1,203 | 501 | NM | ||||||||||||||
Income before taxes and noncontrolling interest | $ | 2,783 | $ | 2,622 | 6 | % | $ | 12,006 | $ | 5,968 | NM | |||||||||
Income taxes | 916 | 969 | (5 | ) | 3,945 | 1,809 | NM | |||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | 1,867 | 1,653 | 13 | 8,061 | 4,159 | 94 | % | |||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | 8 | (100 | ) | 1 | 12 | (92 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 1,867 | $ | 1,645 | 13 | % | $ | 8,060 | $ | 4,147 | 94 | % | ||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 749 | $ | 1,004 | (25 | )% | $ | 772 | $ | 1,044 | (26 | )% | ||||||||
Return on assets | 1.00 | % | 0.66 | % | 2.11 | % | 0.80 | % | ||||||||||||
Revenues by region: | ||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 1,898 | $ | 3,507 | (46 | )% | $ | 7,142 | $ | 7,099 | 1 | % | ||||||||
EMEA | 2,555 | 1,970 | 30 | 6,776 | 3,703 | 83 | ||||||||||||||
Latin America | 1,046 | 722 | 45 | 1,844 | 1,403 | 31 | ||||||||||||||
Asia | 1,373 | 1,207 | 14 | 3,534 | 2,919 | 21 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 6,872 | $ | 7,406 | (7 | )% | $ | 19,296 | $ | 15,124 | 28 | % | ||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations by region: | ||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 3 | $ | 646 | (100 | )% | $ | 2,570 | $ | 2,028 | 27 | % | ||||||||
EMEA | 746 | 376 | 98 | 2,918 | 572 | NM | ||||||||||||||
Latin America | 522 | 325 | 61 | 921 | 626 | 47 | ||||||||||||||
Asia | 596 | 306 | 95 | 1,652 | 933 | 77 | ||||||||||||||
Total net income from continuing operations | $ | 1,867 | $ | 1,653 | 13 | % | $ | 8,061 | $ | 4,159 | 94 | % | ||||||||
Securities and Banking | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue details: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Banking | $ | 1,160 | $ | 1,335 | (13 | )% | $ | 2,142 | $ | 2,165 | (1 | )% | ||||||||
Lending | (928 | ) | (155 | ) | NM | (1,257 | ) | 764 | NM | |||||||||||
Equity markets | 1,101 | 1,526 | (28 | ) | 2,705 | 2,687 | 1 | |||||||||||||
Fixed income markets | 5,573 | 4,439 | 26 | 15,794 | 9,171 | 72 | ||||||||||||||
Private bank | 477 | 593 | (20 | ) | 976 | 1,226 | (20 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other Securities and Banking | (511 | ) | (332 | ) | (54 | ) | (1,064 | ) | (889 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||
Total Securities and Banking Revenues | $ | 6,872 | $ | 7,406 | (7 | )% | $ | 19,296 | $ | 15,124 | 28 | % | ||||||||
NM Not meaningful
2Q09 vs. 2Q08
Revenues, net of interest expense decreased 7% primarily due to revenue marks of negative $777 million and lending revenues of negative $928 million, due mainly to losses on credit default swap hedges, which offset strong trading results in fixed income markets revenues. Investment banking revenues were down 13% from the second quarter of 2008, a quarter driven by stronger M&A and equity volumes, due primarily to lower advisory and equity underwriting revenues. Equity markets revenues were down 28% from the prior-year period, primarily driven by net negative revenue marks of $694 million due to the narrowing in Citigroup credit spreads, partially offset by the narrowing of counterparty spreads. Private bank revenues were down 20% on lower assets under management, decreased investment sales and lower average lending volumes. Fixed income markets revenues were up 26% driven by strong results across most fixed income categories reflecting favorable positioning and sustained client activity.
Operating expenses decreased 25% driven by headcount reductions, repositioning charges recorded in the second quarter of 2008 and reductions in other operating expenses.
Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased by 98% mainly due to increased credit reserve builds and provisions for unfunded lending commitments, partially offset by lower net credit losses.
2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense increased 28% mainly due to an increase in fixed income markets of $6.6 billion to $15.8 billion, mostly in the first quarter of 2009, reflecting strong trading results, offset by a decrease in lending revenues to a negative $1.3 billion mainly from losses on credit default swap hedges.
Operating expenses decreased 30% driven by lower compensation due to headcount reductions and benefits from re-engineering and expense management.
Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased $0.5 billion to $1.2 billion mainly from increased credit reserve builds.
TRANSACTION SERVICES
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 1,455 | $ | 1,314 | 11 | % | $ | 2,861 | $ | 2,609 | 10 | % | ||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 1,028 | 1,165 | (12 | ) | 1,996 | 2,287 | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||
Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 2,483 | $ | 2,479 | — | $ | 4,857 | $ | 4,896 | (1 | )% | |||||||||
Operating expenses | 1,088 | 1,335 | (19 | )% | 2,162 | 2,595 | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims | 5 | 11 | (55 | ) | 6 | 13 | (54 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income before taxes and noncontrolling interest | $ | 1,390 | $ | 1,133 | 23 | % | $ | 2,689 | $ | 2,288 | 18 | % | ||||||||
Income taxes | 416 | 344 | 21 | 811 | 688 | 18 | ||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | 974 | 789 | 23 | 1,878 | 1,600 | 17 | ||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 3 | 9 | (67 | ) | (1 | ) | 17 | NM | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 971 | $ | 780 | 24 | % | $ | 1,879 | $ | 1,583 | 19 | % | ||||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 60 | $ | 73 | (18 | )% | $ | 60 | $ | 73 | (18 | )% | ||||||||
Return on assets | 6.49 | % | 4.30 | % | 6.32 | % | 4.36 | % | ||||||||||||
Revenues by region: | ||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 656 | $ | 511 | 28 | % | $ | 1,245 | $ | 1,017 | 22 | % | ||||||||
EMEA | 860 | 947 | (9 | ) | 1,704 | 1,831 | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 340 | 374 | (9 | ) | 683 | 714 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||
Asia | 627 | 647 | (3 | ) | 1,225 | 1,334 | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 2,483 | $ | 2,479 | — | $ | 4,857 | $ | 4,896 | (1 | )% | |||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations by region: | ||||||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 181 | $ | 61 | NM | $ | 319 | $ | 149 | NM | ||||||||||
EMEA | 350 | 299 | 17 | % | 676 | 577 | 17 | % | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 150 | 151 | (1 | ) | 310 | 292 | 6 | |||||||||||||
Asia | 293 | 278 | 5 | 573 | 582 | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total net income from continuing operations | $ | 974 | $ | 789 | 23 | % | $ | 1,878 | $ | 1,600 | 17 | % | ||||||||
Key Indicators(in billions of dollars) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average deposits and other customer liability balances | $ | 288 | $ | 275 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||
EOP assets under custody(in trillions of dollars) | $ | 11.1 | $ | 12.8 | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||||
NM Not meaningful
2Q09 vs. 2Q08
Revenues, net of interest expense were $2.5 billion, in line with the prior-year period as clients remained actively engaged. Growth in deposits and increasing spreads were offset by the impact of FX translation and declines in assets under custody. Average deposits increased by 5%, driven by growth in North America and Asia. Assets under custody declined by 13% from the prior-year period, primarily due to lower equity markets.
Operating expenses declined by 19% driven by headcount reduction, re-engineering efforts, expense management initiatives and the impact of FX translation.
2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense of $4.9 billion decreased slightly from the prior-year period driven primarily by the impact of FX translation, as well as by lower volumes and asset under custody valuations.
Operating expenses declined 17% driven by headcount reduction and re-engineering benefits, as well as the impact of FX translation.
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 4,495 | $ | 5,929 | (24 | )% | $ | 9,878 | $ | 11,526 | (14 | )% | ||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 11,255 | (3,850 | ) | NM | 9,324 | (13,965 | ) | NM | ||||||||||||
Total Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 15,750 | $ | 2,079 | NM | $ | 19,202 | $ | (2,439 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 6,795 | $ | 3,021 | NM | $ | 12,840 | $ | 5,729 | NM | ||||||||||
Credit reserve build/ (release) | 2,711 | 2,100 | 29 | % | 4,405 | 3,566 | 24 | % | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | $ | 9,506 | $ | 5,121 | 86 | % | $ | 17,245 | $ | 9,295 | 86 | % | ||||||||
Provision for benefits & claims | 294 | 258 | 14 | 613 | 532 | 15 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments | 52 | (68 | ) | NM | 80 | (68 | ) | NM | ||||||||||||
Total provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 9,852 | $ | 5,311 | 86 | % | $ | 17,938 | $ | 9,759 | 84 | % | ||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 3,827 | $ | 5,316 | (28 | )% | $ | 8,215 | $ | 11,270 | (27 | )% | ||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 2,071 | $ | (8,548 | ) | NM | $ | (6,951 | ) | $ | (23,468 | ) | 70 | % | ||||||
Provision (benefits) for income taxes | 712 | (3,323 | ) | NM | (2,974 | ) | (9,093 | ) | 67 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 1,359 | $ | (5,225 | ) | NM | $ | (3,977 | ) | $ | (14,375 | ) | 72 | % | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | (37 | ) | 52 | NM | (50 | ) | 22 | NM | ||||||||||||
Citi Holding's net income (loss) | $ | 1,396 | $ | (5,277 | ) | NM | $ | (3,927 | ) | $ | (14,397 | ) | 73 | % | ||||||
Balance Sheet Data (in billions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total EOP assets | $ | 649 | $ | 833 | (22 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Average assets | $ | 677 | $ | 852 | (21 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Total EOP deposits | $ | 88 | $ | 84 | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||
NM Not meaningful
BROKERAGE AND ASSET MANAGEMENT
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 168 | $ | 230 | (27 | )% | $ | 516 | $ | 409 | 26 | % | ||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 12,171 | 2,237 | NM | 13,524 | 4,448 | NM | ||||||||||||||
Total Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 12,339 | $ | 2,467 | NM | $ | 14,040 | $ | 4,857 | NM | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 1,096 | $ | 2,002 | (45 | )% | $ | 2,642 | $ | 4,452 | (41 | )% | ||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 1 | $ | — | — | $ | 3 | $ | 10 | (70 | )% | |||||||||
Credit reserve build/(release) | 3 | 9 | (67 | )% | 46 | 10 | NM | |||||||||||||
Provision for benefits and claims | 34 | 45 | (24 | ) | 75 | 97 | (23 | ) | ||||||||||||
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 38 | $ | 54 | (30 | )% | $ | 124 | $ | 117 | 6 | % | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 11,205 | $ | 411 | NM | $ | 11,274 | $ | 288 | NM | ||||||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | 4,391 | 144 | NM | 4,402 | 135 | NM | ||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 6,814 | $ | 267 | NM | $ | 6,872 | $ | 153 | NM | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 6 | 49 | (88 | )% | (11 | ) | 38 | NM | ||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 6,808 | $ | 218 | NM | $ | 6,883 | $ | 115 | NM | ||||||||||
EOP assets (in billions of dollars) | $ | 56 | $ | 65 | (14 | )% | ||||||||||||||
EOP deposits (in billions of dollars) | $ | 56 | $ | 50 | 12 | |||||||||||||||
NM Not meaningful
2Q09 vs. 2Q08
Revenues, net of interest expense increased $9.9 billion due to an $11.1 billion pretax gain on sale ($6.7 billion after-tax) on the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture transaction, which closed on June 1, 2009. Excluding the gain, revenues declined $1.2 billion driven by the absence of one month of Smith Barney revenues as well as the impact of market conditions on Smith Barney transactional and fee-based revenue relative to the prior year.
Operating expenses decreased 45% from the prior-year period, primarily driven by lower revenue-driven expenses in Smith Barney, a one month absence of Smith Barney expenses, lower variable compensation and re-engineering efforts, particularly in retail alternative investments.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased by 30% mainly reflecting lower provisions for benefits and claims.
2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense increased $9.2 billion due to an $11.1 billion pre-tax gain on sale ($6.7 billion after-tax) on the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture transaction which closed on June 1, 2009. Excluding the gain, revenue declined $1.9 billion driven by the absence of one month of Smith Barney revenues as well as the impact of market conditions on Smith Barney transactional and fee-based revenue relative to the prior year.
Operating expenses decreased $1.8 billion, or 41%, primarily driven by lower revenue-driven expenses in Smith Barney, a one month absence of Smith Barney expenses, lower variable compensation and re-engineering efforts, particularly in retail alternative investments.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased by 6% due to reserve builds in Smith Barney for SFAS 114 (ASC 310-10-35) impaired loans and lending to address client liquidity needs related to auction rate securities holdings, partially offset by lower provisions for benefits and claims.
LOCAL CONSUMER LENDING
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % Change | % Change | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 3,387 | $ | 4,807 | (30 | )% | $ | 7,277 | $ | 9,403 | (23 | )% | ||||||||
Non-interest revenue | 543 | 1,417 | (62 | ) | 3,106 | 4,321 | (28 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 3,930 | $ | 6,224 | (37 | )% | $ | 10,383 | $ | 13,724 | (24 | )% | ||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 2,524 | $ | 3,046 | (17 | )% | $ | 5,135 | $ | 6,247 | (18 | )% | ||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 5,156 | $ | 2,982 | 73 | % | $ | 9,688 | $ | 5,629 | 72 | % | ||||||||
Credit reserve build/(release) | 2,812 | 1,862 | 51 | 4,399 | 3,156 | 39 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for benefits and claims | 260 | 213 | 22 | 538 | 435 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 8,228 | $ | 5,057 | 63 | % | $ | 14,625 | $ | 9,220 | 59 | % | ||||||||
Loss from continuing operations before taxes | $ | (6,822 | ) | $ | (1,879 | ) | NM | $ | (9,377 | ) | $ | (1,743 | ) | NM | ||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (2,629 | ) | (673 | ) | NM | (3,765 | ) | (662 | ) | NM | ||||||||||
Loss from continuing operations | $ | (4,193 | ) | $ | (1,206 | ) | NM | $ | (5,612 | ) | $ | (1,081 | ) | NM | ||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 5 | 8 | (38 | )% | 10 | 12 | (17 | )% | ||||||||||||
Net loss | $ | (4,198 | ) | $ | (1,214 | ) | NM | $ | (5,622 | ) | $ | (1,093 | ) | NM | ||||||
Average assets(in billions of dollars) | $ | 398 | $ | 478 | (17 | )% | $ | 403 | $ | 479 | (16 | )% | ||||||||
Net credit losses as a % of average loans | 6.26 | % | 3.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
NM Not meaningful
2Q09 vs. 2Q08
Revenues, net of interest expense decreased 37% mainlyTotals may not sum due to a decline in net interest revenue, higher net credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts in North America and a special FDIC assessment.Net interest revenue was 30% lower than the prior year driven by lower balances (due to run-off and credit tightening) and spread compression due largely to higher non-accrual loans, the FDIC special assessment and the impact of loan modifications. Average loans were down 13%, with North America (ex Cards) down 11%, North America Cards down 20%, and International down 21%.Non-interest revenue declined 62%, primarily due to higher credit costs flowing through the securitization trusts in North America and lower securitization gains. Non-interest revenue was also negatively impacted by $266 million of losses on credit default swap hedges.
Operating expenses decreased 17% primarily due to re-engineering actions, lower volumes and marketing expenses and the absence of a $85 million repositioning charge in the prior-year quarter. The declines in expenses were partially offset by higher other real estate owned assets (OREO) and collections costs.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased by 63%, reflecting higher reserve builds of $1.0 billion and increased net credit losses of $2.2 billion driven by deteriorating economic conditions globally. The reserve builds in the 2009 second quarter were mainly driven by increases for residential mortgage loans in North America as well as increases in EMEA. Net credit losses were higher versus the prior year across all businesses. The net credit reserve build for residential mortgages was driven by increases in first and second mortgages as well as continued deterioration in the housing market. Credit costs in North America also reflected a continued increase in credit losses in credit cards and commercial real estate. International credit costs reflected continued deterioration in CitiFinancial Japan, the U.K., Greece and Spain. The net credit loss ratio increased 310 basis points from the prior-year quarter with North America (ex Cards) up 267 basis points to 4.98%, International up 422 basis points to 9.69% and North America Cards up 707 basis points to 14.83%.
2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense decreased 24% due to a decline in net interest revenue, higher net credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts in North America and a special FDIC assessment.Net interest revenue was 23% lower than the prior year driven by lower balances (due to run-off and credit tightening) and spread compression due largely to higher non-accrual loans, the FDIC special assessment and the impact of loan modifications.Non-interest revenue declined 28%, primarily due to higher credit costs flowing through the securitization trusts in North America and lower securitization gains. Non-interest revenue was also negatively impacted by $266 million of losses on credit default swap hedges. Year-to-date non-interest revenue also included a $1.1 billion pretax gain on the sale of the Company's remaining stake in Redecard as compared to a prior-year pretax gain on sale of Redecard of $663 million.
Operating expenses decreased 18% primarily due to re-engineering actions, lower volumes and marketing expenses and the absence of prior-year repositioning charges. The declines in expenses were partially offset by higher OREO and collections costs.
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased by 59%, reflecting higher reserve builds of $1.2 billion and increased net credit losses of $4.1 billion driven by deteriorating economic conditions globally. The reserve builds in 2009 were mainly driven by increases for residential mortgage loans and retail partners cards in North America as well as increases in EMEA; net credit losses were higher versus the prior year across all businesses.
Assets declined 16%, primarily driven by lower loans due to run-off and the impact of credit tightening.
Mortgage Modifications and Recent Legislative Actions
Citigroup Mortgage Modification Programs
The Company has instituted a variety of programs to assist borrowers with financial difficulties to stay in their homes. These programs include modifying the original loan terms, reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. Each borrower's financial situation is evaluated individually. If a borrower meets certain criteria (for example, based on verifiable cash reserves and the level of debt to income), Citi works to develop a modification program suited to the needs of the borrower's situation.
In addition, Citi expects a significant number of loan modifications will be offered under the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), which was rolled out in the second quarter.
During the second quarter of 2009, Citi observed declines in mortgage delinquencies for loans that were delinquent in the 90 day to 179 day bucket. Well over half of these declines were attributable to loss mitigation and modification initiatives that the Company has put in place, including the loan modification programs described above. The future loss rates associated with these loan modification programs (both for those loans that qualify under HAMP and for those made under Citi's loan modification programs) could have an impact on the Company's future delinquency trends and loan loss reserving actions.
Home Affordable Modification Program
On March 4, 2009, the U.S. Treasury (UST) announced details of the Obama administration's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). HAMP is designed to reduce the monthly mortgage payments to a 31% housing debt ratio by lowering the interest rate, extending the term of the loan and forbearing principal of certain eligible borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgages, or who are at risk of imminent default due to economic hardship. In order to be entitled to loan modifications, borrowers must complete a three-month trial period, and must be current at the end of the trial period. During the trial period, the original terms of the loans remain in effect pending final modification.
With respect to interest rate reductions, if the reduced interest rate is equal to or greater than the Freddie Mac Survey Rate at the time of modification, the reduced rate is permanent. If the reduced rate is less than the Freddie Mac Survey Rate at the time of modification, the rate will remain in effect for a period of five years. After five years, the interest rate may increase annually to a rate capped at the Freddie Mac Survey Rate at the time of original modification. The financial impact of interest rate reductions are shared between participating financial institutions, including Citi's wholly-owned subsidiary, CitiMortgage Inc., and the UST.
Under HAMP, investors and servicers of mortgages are entitled to receive certain payments from the UST based on the completion of loan modifications and continued borrower performance under the modified terms. To date, Citi has not recorded any fees under HAMP, as the trial period began in June 2009. During the trial period, the borrower continues to owe interest at the original contractual rate and recognizes interest to the extent permitted under Citi's nonaccrual policy. In addition, the Company does not record charge-offs while the loans are in the trial period if at least one payment under the trial period terms has been made.
The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009
See "Citicorp—North America Retail Consumer Banking" above for a description of The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act) and the potential impact of the CARD Act on Citigroup's credit card businesses.
SPECIAL ASSET POOL
| Second Quarter | | Six Months | | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | % Change | 2009 | 2008 | % Change | ||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 940 | $ | 892 | 5 | % | $ | 2,085 | $ | 1,714 | 22 | % | ||||||||
Non-interest revenue | (1,459 | ) | (7,504 | ) | 81 | (7,306 | ) | (22,734 | ) | 68 | ||||||||||
Total Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | (519 | ) | $ | (6,612 | ) | 92 | % | $ | (5,221 | ) | $ | (21,020 | ) | 75 | % | ||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 207 | $ | 268 | (23 | )% | $ | 438 | $ | 571 | (23 | )% | ||||||||
Net credit losses | $ | 1,638 | $ | 39 | NM | $ | 3,149 | $ | 90 | NM | ||||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments | 52 | (68 | ) | NM | 80 | (68 | ) | NM | ||||||||||||
Credit reserve builds (release) | (104 | ) | 229 | NM | (40 | ) | 400 | NM | ||||||||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 1,586 | $ | 200 | NM | $ | 3,189 | $ | 422 | NM | ||||||||||
(Loss) from continuing operations before taxes | $ | (2,312 | ) | $ | (7,080 | ) | 67 | % | $ | (8,848 | ) | $ | (22,013 | ) | 60 | % | ||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (1,050 | ) | (2,794 | ) | 62 | (3,611 | ) | (8,566 | ) | 58 | ||||||||||
(Loss) from continuing operations | $ | (1,262 | ) | $ | (4,286 | ) | 71 | % | $ | (5,237 | ) | $ | (13,447 | ) | 61 | % | ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | (48 | ) | (5 | ) | NM | (49 | ) | (28 | ) | (75 | ) | |||||||||
Net (loss) | $ | (1,214 | ) | $ | (4,281 | ) | 72 | % | $ | (5,188 | ) | $ | (13,419 | ) | 61 | % | ||||
EOP assets(in billions of dollars) | 201 | 299 | (33 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
NM Not meaningful
2Q09 vs. 2Q08
Revenues, net of interest expense increased 92% primarily due to favorable net revenue marks relative to the prior-year quarter. Revenue in the current quarter included positive marks of $613 million on subprime-related direct exposures and $804 million positive CVA on derivative positions, excluding monoline insurers, partially offset by $967 million other revenue write-downs and losses. Revenue in the current quarter was also negatively impacted by $1.1 billion of losses related to hedges of various asset positions.
Operating expenses declined 23%, mainly driven by lower volumes and lower transaction expenses.
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased by $1.4 billion primarily driven by $1.6 billion in write-offs, partially offset by a lower loan loss reserve of $213 million. The net $104 million net credit reserve release in the second quarter of 2009 was driven by a $750 million release for specific counterparties, partially offset by builds for specific counterparties.
2Q09 YTD vs. 2Q08 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense increased 75% primarily due to favorable net revenue relative to the prior period. Revenue year-to-date included a $1.1 billion positive CVA on derivative positions, offset by negative revenue of $1.7 billion on subprime-related direct exposures and $1.1 billion of negative marks for private equity positions. Revenue year-to-date was also negatively impacted by $2.9 billion related to CVA on fair value option liabilities and monolines, Alt-A mortgages, CRE, and leveraged finance commitments.
Operating expenses declined 23% mainly driven by lower volumes and lower transaction expenses.
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased by $2.8 billion primarily driven by the $3.1 billion increase in write-offs over the period. Significant write-offs included exposures in Lyondell Basell. The net $40 million net credit reserve release in the current period was driven by a $2.1 billion release for specific counterparties (including Lyondell Basell), partially offset by builds for specific counterparties.rounding.
Corporate/Other includes global staff functions (includes finance, risk, human resources, legal and compliance) and other corporate expense, global operations and technology (O&T), residual Corporate Treasury and Corporate items. At June 30, 2010, this segment had approximately $262 billion of assets, consisting primarily of Citi's liquidity portfolio.
| Second Quarter | Six Months | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | (111 | ) | $ | (577 | ) | $ | (755 | ) | $ | (1,116 | ) | |
Non-interest revenue | (630 | ) | (730 | ) | 514 | (625 | ) | ||||||
Total Revenues, net of interest expense | $ | (741 | ) | $ | (1,307 | ) | $ | (241 | ) | $ | (1,741 | ) | |
Total operating expenses | 323 | (2 | ) | 423 | 95 | ||||||||
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims | 1 | — | 1 | — | |||||||||
(Loss) from continuing operations before taxes | $ | (1,065 | ) | $ | (1,305 | ) | $ | (665 | ) | $ | (1,836 | ) | |
Income taxes (benefits) | (1,035 | ) | (768 | ) | 17 | (615 | ) | ||||||
(Loss) from continuing operations | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (537 | ) | $ | (682 | ) | $ | (1,221 | ) | |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | (142 | ) | (94 | ) | (259 | ) | (35 | ) | |||||
Net (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests | $ | (172 | ) | $ | (631 | ) | $ | (941 | ) | $ | (1,256 | ) | |
Net Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | (1 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Net (loss) | $ | (172 | ) | $ | (630 | ) | $ | (941 | ) | $ | (1,256 | ) | |
| Second Quarter | Six Months | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 326 | $ | (107 | ) | $ | 642 | $ | (749 | ) | |||
Non-interest revenue | 337 | (634 | ) | 370 | 508 | ||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 663 | $ | (741 | ) | $ | 1,012 | $ | (241 | ) | |||
Total operating expenses | $ | 352 | $ | 322 | $ | 811 | $ | 423 | |||||
Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims | — | — | 1 | 2 | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes | $ | 311 | $ | (1,063 | ) | $ | 200 | $ | (666 | ) | |||
Income taxes (benefits) | 182 | (1,032 | ) | 107 | 17 | ||||||||
(Loss) from continuing operations | $ | 129 | $ | (31 | ) | $ | 93 | $ | (683 | ) | |||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | (3 | ) | (142 | ) | 208 | (259 | ) | ||||||
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests | $ | 126 | $ | (173 | ) | $ | 301 | $ | (942 | ) | |||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | — | — | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 126 | $ | (173 | ) | $ | 301 | $ | (940 | ) | |||
2Q092Q10 vs. 2Q082Q09
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased primarily due to reduced mark-to-market volatility in Treasury hedging activities, benefits from lower intersegment eliminations, partially offset by hedging activities.
Operating Expenses increased due to lower intersegment eliminations.
Income Taxes (benefits) decreased due to higher tax benefits held at Corporate in the current year.short-term interest rates and gains on credit default swap hedges.
2Q092Q10 YTD vs 2Q08vs. 2Q09 YTD
Revenues, net of interest expense, increased due to lower intersegment eliminations, hedging activities, andimproved Treasury results, the impact of changes in U.S. dollar rates.lower short-term funding costs and gains on credit default swap hedges.
Operating Expenses increased, primarily due to lowercompensation-related costs, legal reserve charges and intersegment eliminations.
SEGMENT BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 2010
In millions of dollars | Regional Consumer Banking | Institutional Clients Group | Subtotal Citicorp | Citi Holdings | Corporate/Other, Discontinued Operations and Consolidating Eliminations | Total Citigroup Consolidated | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 8,074 | $ | 14,825 | $ | 22,899 | $ | 1,196 | $ | 614 | $ | 24,709 | ||||||||
Deposits with banks | 8,176 | 47,812 | 55,988 | 4,510 | 100,282 | 160,780 | ||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 340 | 223,974 | 224,314 | 6,468 | 2 | 230,784 | ||||||||||||||
Brokerage receivables | — | 25,424 | 25,424 | 11,045 | 403 | 36,872 | ||||||||||||||
Trading account assets | 11,531 | 284,958 | 296,489 | 20,937 | (8,014 | ) | 309,412 | |||||||||||||
Investments | 33,857 | 98,185 | 132,042 | 71,262 | 113,762 | 317,066 | ||||||||||||||
Loans, net of unearned income | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | 216,966 | — | 216,966 | 288,480 | — | 505,446 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | — | 161,432 | 161,432 | 25,262 | 26 | 186,720 | ||||||||||||||
Loans, net of unearned income | $ | 216,966 | $ | 161,432 | $ | 378,398 | $ | 313,742 | $ | 26 | $ | 692,166 | ||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | (14,106 | ) | (3,418 | ) | (17,524 | ) | (28,673 | ) | — | (46,197 | ) | |||||||||
Total loans, net | $ | 202,860 | $ | 158,014 | $ | 360,874 | $ | 285,069 | $ | 26 | $ | 645,969 | ||||||||
Goodwill | 10,070 | 10,473 | 20,543 | 4,658 | — | 25,201 | ||||||||||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs) | 2,288 | 989 | 3,277 | 4,591 | — | 7,868 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) | 1,890 | 70 | 1,960 | 2,934 | — | 4,894 | ||||||||||||||
Other assets | 29,854 | 37,595 | 67,449 | 52,095 | 54,557 | 174,101 | ||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 308,940 | $ | 902,319 | $ | 1,211,259 | $ | 464,765 | $ | 261,632 | $ | 1,937,656 | ||||||||
Liabilities and equity | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits | $ | 291,378 | $ | 427,314 | $ | 718,692 | $ | 82,163 | $ | 13,096 | $ | 813,951 | ||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 3,812 | 191,922 | 195,734 | 233 | 145 | 196,112 | ||||||||||||||
Brokerage payables | 134 | 54,069 | 54,203 | — | 571 | 54,774 | ||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | 28 | 127,973 | 128,001 | 3,000 | — | 131,001 | ||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 143 | 56,844 | 56,987 | 6,035 | 29,730 | 92,752 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 3,033 | 76,131 | 79,164 | 44,261 | 289,872 | 413,297 | ||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 17,344 | 16,531 | 33,875 | 22,006 | 22,558 | 78,439 | ||||||||||||||
Net inter-segment funding (lending) | (6,932 | ) | (48,465 | ) | (55,397 | ) | 307,067 | (251,670 | ) | — | ||||||||||
Total Citigroup stockholders' equity | — | — | — | — | $ | 154,806 | $ | 154,806 | ||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | — | — | — | — | 2,524 | 2,524 | ||||||||||||||
Total equity | — | — | — | — | 157,330 | 157,330 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 308,940 | $ | 902,319 | $ | 1,211,259 | $ | 464,765 | $ | 261,632 | $ | 1,937,656 | ||||||||
The supplemental information presented above reflects Citigroup's consolidated GAAP balance sheet by reporting segment as of June 30, 2010. The respective segment information depicts the assets and liabilities managed by each segment as of such date. While this presentation is not defined by GAAP, Citi believes that these non-GAAP financial measures enhance investors' understanding of the balance sheet components managed by the underlying business segments, as well as the beneficial inter-relationship of the asset and liability dynamics of the balance sheet components among Citi's business segments.
TARPCAPITAL RESOURCES AND OTHER REGULATORY PROGRAMSLIQUIDITY
Issuance of $45 Billion of Preferred Stock and Warrants to Purchase Common Stock under TARP CAPITAL RESOURCES
On October 28, 2008Overview
Historically, Citi has generated capital by earnings from its operating businesses. However, Citi may augment, and December 31, 2008, Citigroup raised $25 billionduring the recent financial crisis did augment, its capital through issuances of common stock, convertible preferred stock, preferred stock, equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans, and, $20 billion, respectively,in the case of regulatory capital, through the saleissuance of subordinated debt underlying trust preferred stocksecurities. Further, the impact of future events on Citi's business results, such as corporate and warrantsasset dispositions, as well as changes in regulatory and accounting standards, also affect Citi's capital levels.
Capital is used primarily to purchasesupport assets in Citi's businesses and to absorb market, credit or operational losses. While capital may be used for other purposes, such as to pay dividends or repurchase common stock, Citi's ability to utilize its capital for these purposes is currently restricted due to its agreements with the U.S. government, generally for so long as the U.S. government continues to hold Citi's common stock or trust preferred securities.
Citigroup's capital management framework is designed to ensure that Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with Citi's risk profile and all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines, as well as external rating agency considerations. The capital management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is reviewed at the consolidated, legal entity and country levels.
Senior management is responsible for the capital management process mainly through Citigroup's Finance and Asset and Liability Committee (FinALCO), with oversight from the Risk Management and Finance Committee of Citigroup's Board of Directors. The FinALCO is composed of the senior-most management of Citigroup for the purpose of engaging management in decision-making and related discussions on capital and liquidity matters. Among other things, FinALCO's responsibilities include: determining the financial structure of Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries; ensuring that Citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized in consultation with its regulators; determining appropriate asset levels and return hurdles for Citigroup and individual businesses; reviewing the funding and capital markets plan for Citigroup; and monitoring interest rate risk, corporate and bank liquidity, and the impact of currency translation on non-U.S. earnings and capital.
Capital Ratios
Citigroup is subject to the UST asrisk-based capital guidelines issued by the Federal Reserve Board. Historically, capital adequacy has been measured, in part, based on two risk-based capital ratios, the Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) ratios. Tier 1 Capital consists of the UST's Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP)sum of "core capital elements," such as qualifying common stockholders' equity, as adjusted, qualifying noncontrolling interests, and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts, principally reduced by goodwill, other disallowed intangible assets, and disallowed deferred tax assets. Total Capital Purchase Program. Allalso includes "supplementary" Tier 2 Capital elements, such as qualifying subordinated debt and a limited portion of the proceeds were treatedallowance for credit losses. Both measures of capital adequacy are stated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets.
In 2009, the U.S. banking regulators developed a new measure of capital termed "Tier 1 Common," which is defined as Tier 1 Capital less non-common elements, including qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests, and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts. Tier 1 Common and related capital adequacy ratios are measures used and relied upon by U.S. banking regulators; however, they are non-GAAP financial measures for SEC purposes. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.
Citigroup's risk-weighted assets are principally derived from application of the risk-based capital guidelines related to the measurement of credit risk. Pursuant to these guidelines, on-balance-sheet assets and the credit equivalent amount of certain off-balance-sheet exposures (such as financial guarantees, unfunded lending commitments, letters of credit, and derivatives) are assigned to one of several prescribed risk-weight categories based upon the perceived credit risk associated with the obligor, or if relevant, the guarantor, the nature of the collateral, or external credit ratings. Risk-weighted assets also incorporate a measure for market risk on covered trading account positions and all foreign exchange and commodity positions whether or not carried in the trading account. Excluded from risk-weighted assets are any assets, such as goodwill and deferred tax assets, to the extent required to be deducted from regulatory capital. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.
Citigroup is also subject to a Leverage ratio requirement, a non-risk-based measure of capital adequacy, which is defined as Tier 1 Capital as a percentage of quarterly adjusted average total assets.
To be "well capitalized" under current federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a bank holding company must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital ratio of at least 10%, and a Leverage ratio of at least 3%, and not be subject to a Federal Reserve Board directive to maintain higher capital levels. The following table sets forth Citigroup's regulatory capital purposes.
As part of the public and private exchange offers, the aggregate $25 billion of preferred stock issued to the UST in October 2008 was exchanged for interim securities and a warrant. The warrant will terminate, and the interim securities will automatically convert into Citigroup common stock, following shareholder approval of the increase in the Company's authorized common stock. See "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above. In addition, as part of the public and private exchange offers, the aggregate $20 billion of preferred stock issued to the UST in December 2008 was exchanged for newly issued 8% trust preferred securities. See "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above.
For a discussion of the accounting impact of the exchange offers, see "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above.
The warrant issued to the UST in October 2008 has a term of 10 years, an exercise price of $17.85 per share and is exercisable for approximately 210.1 million shares of common stock, which will be reduced by one-half if Citigroup raises an additional $25 billion through the issuance of Tier 1-qualifying perpetual preferred or common stock by December 31, 2009. The value ascribed to the warrant, or $1.3 billion out of the $25 billion in cash proceeds, on a relative fair value basis, was recorded in Citigroup's stockholders' equity and resulted in an increase inAdditional paid-in capital. The warrant issued to the UST in December 2008 has a term of 10 years, an exercise price of $10.61 per share and is exercisable for approximately 188.5 million shares of common stock. The value ascribed to the warrant, or $0.5 billion out of the $20 billion in cash proceeds, on a relative fair value basis, was recorded in Citigroup's stockholders' equity and resulted in an increase inAdditional paid-in capital.
The fair value for the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The valuation was based on the Citigroup stock price, stock volatility, dividend yield, and the risk free rate on the measurement date for both the issuances.
FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program
Under the terms of the FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP), the FDIC will guarantee, until the earlier of either its maturity or June 30, 2012 (for qualifying debt issued before April 1, 2009) or December 31, 2012 (for qualifying debt issued on or after April 1, 2009 through October 31, 2009), certain qualifying senior unsecured debt issued by certain Citigroup entities between October 31, 2008 and October 31, 2009 in amounts up to 125% of the qualifying debt for each qualifying entity. The FDIC charges Citigroup a fee ranging from 50 to 150 basis points in accordance with a prescribed fee schedule for any qualifying debt issued with the FDIC guarantee.
As to any entity participating in the TLGP, the TLGP regulations grant discretion to the FDIC, after consultation with the participating entity's appropriate Federal banking agency, to determine that the entity will no longer be permitted to continue to participate in the TLGP. If the FDIC makes that determination, it will inform the entity that it will no longer be provided the protections of the TLGP. Such a determination will not affect the guarantee of prior debt issuances under the TLGP.
As of June 30, 2009, Citigroup and its affiliates had issued a total of $44.7 billion of long-term debt that is covered under the FDIC guarantee, with $6.35 billion maturing in 2010, $14.75 billion maturing in 2011 and $23.5 billion maturing in 2012.
In addition,ratios as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Citigroup, through its subsidiaries, also had $27.7 billion in outstanding commercial paper and interbank deposits backed by the FDIC. The FDIC also charges a fee ranging from 50 to 150 basis points in connection with the issuance of those instruments.
FDIC Increased Deposit Insurance
On October 4, 2008, the FDIC increased the insurance it provides on U.S. deposits in most banks and savings associations located in the United States, including Citibank, N.A., from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor, per insured bank.respectively.
Citigroup Regulatory Capital Ratios
| Jun. 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Common | 9.71 | % | 9.60 | % | |||
Tier 1 Capital | 11.99 | 11.67 | |||||
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) | 15.59 | 15.25 | |||||
Leverage | 6.31 | 6.87 | |||||
As noted in the table above, Citigroup was "well capitalized" under the federal bank regulatory agency definitions as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Common | ||||||||
Citigroup common stockholders' equity | $ | 154,494 | $ | 152,388 | ||||
Less: Net unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale, net of tax(1) | (2,259 | ) | (4,347 | ) | ||||
Less: Accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax | (3,184 | ) | (3,182 | ) | ||||
Less: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax(2) | (3,465 | ) | (3,461 | ) | ||||
Less: Cumulative effect included in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to the change in own credit worthiness, net of tax(3) | 973 | 760 | ||||||
Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets(4) | 31,493 | 26,044 | ||||||
Less: Intangible assets: | ||||||||
Goodwill | 25,213 | 25,392 | ||||||
Other disallowed intangible assets | 5,393 | 5,899 | ||||||
Other | (776 | ) | (788 | ) | ||||
Total Tier 1 Common | $ | 99,554 | $ | 104,495 | ||||
Qualifying perpetual preferred stock | $ | 312 | $ | 312 | ||||
Qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts | 20,091 | 19,217 | ||||||
Qualifying noncontrolling interests | 1,077 | 1,135 | ||||||
Other | 1,875 | 1,875 | ||||||
Total Tier 1 Capital | $ | 122,909 | $ | 127,034 | ||||
Tier 2 Capital | ||||||||
Allowance for credit losses(5) | $ | 13,275 | $ | 13,934 | ||||
Qualifying subordinated debt(6) | 22,825 | 24,242 | ||||||
Net unrealized pretax gains on available-for-sale equity securities(1) | 743 | 773 | ||||||
Total Tier 2 Capital | $ | 36,843 | $ | 38,949 | ||||
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital) | $ | 159,752 | $ | 165,983 | ||||
Risk-weighted assets(7) | $ | 1,024,929 | $ | 1,088,526 | ||||
BackgroundAdoption of SFAS 166/167 Impact on Capital
OnThe adoption of SFAS 166/167 had a significant and immediate impact on Citigroup's capital ratios as of January 15, 2009, Citigroup entered1, 2010.
As described further in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the adoption of SFAS 166/167 resulted in the consolidation of $137 billion of incremental assets and $146 billion of liabilities onto Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet, including securitized credit card receivables on the date of adoption, January 1, 2010. The adoption of SFAS 166/167 also resulted in a net increase of $10 billion in risk-weighted assets. In addition, Citi added $13.4 billion to the loan loss allowance, increased deferred tax assets by $5.0 billion, and reduced retained earnings by $8.4 billion. This translated into a definitive agreementreduction in Tangible Common Equity of $8.4 billion, and a decrease in Tier 1 Common, Tier 1 Capital, and Total Capital of $14.2 billion, $14.2 billion and $14.0 billion, respectively, which were partially offset by net income of $4.4 billion and $2.3 billion of qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts issued during the first quarter of 2010.
The impact on Citigroup's capital ratios from the January 1, 2010 adoption of SFAS 166/167 was as follows:
As of January 1, 2010 | Impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Common | (138 | ) bps | ||
Tier 1 Capital | (141 | ) bps | ||
Total Capital | (142 | ) bps | ||
Leverage | (118 | ) bps | ||
TCE (TCE/RWA) | (87 | ) bps |
For more information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements below.
Common Stockholders' Equity
Citigroup's common stockholders' equity increased during the six months ended June 30, 2010 by $2.1 billion to $154.5 billion, and represented 8.0% of total assets as of June 30, 2010. Citigroup's common stockholders' equity was $152.4 billion, which represented 8.2% of total assets, at December 31, 2009.
The table below summarizes the change in Citigroup's common stockholders' equity during the first six months of 2010:
In billions of dollars | | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Common stockholders' equity, December 31, 2009 | $ | 152.4 | ||
Transition adjustment to retained earnings associated with the adoption of SFAS 166/167 (as of January 1, 2010) | (8.4 | ) | ||
Net income | 7.1 | |||
Employee benefit plans and other activities | 1.7 | |||
ADIA Upper DECs equity units purchase contract | 1.9 | |||
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (0.2 | ) | ||
Common stockholders' equity, June 30, 2010 | $ | 154.5 | ||
As of June 30, 2010, $6.7 billion of stock repurchases remained under Citi's authorized repurchase programs. No material repurchases were made in the first six months of 2010, or the year ended December 31, 2009. For so long as the U.S. government holds any Citigroup common stock or trust preferred securities, Citigroup has generally agreed not to acquire, repurchase or redeem any Citigroup equity or trust preferred securities, other than pursuant to administering its employee benefit plans or other customary exceptions, or with the UST,consent of the FDICU.S. government.
Tangible Common Equity (TCE)
TCE, as defined by Citigroup, representsCommon equity lessGoodwill andIntangible assets (other than Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs)), net of the related net deferred taxes. Other companies may calculate TCE in a manner different from that of Citigroup. Citi's TCE was $121.3 billion at June 30, 2010 and $118.2 billion at December 31, 2009.
The TCE ratio (TCE divided by risk-weighted assets) was 11.8% at June 30, 2010 and 10.9% at December 31, 2009.
TCE is a capital adequacy metric used and relied upon by industry analysts; however, it is a non-GAAP financial measure for SEC purposes. A reconciliation of Citigroup's total stockholders' equity to TCE follows:
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Citigroup stockholders' equity | $ | 154,806 | $ | 152,700 | |||||
Less: | |||||||||
Preferred stock | 312 | 312 | |||||||
Common equity | $ | 154,494 | $ | 152,388 | |||||
Less: | |||||||||
Goodwill | 25,201 | 25,392 | |||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs) | 7,868 | 8,714 | |||||||
Goodwill-recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets | 12 | — | |||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs)— recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets | 54 | — | |||||||
Related net deferred tax assets | 62 | 68 | |||||||
Tangible common equity (TCE) | $ | 121,297 | $ | 118,214 | |||||
Tangible assets | |||||||||
GAAP assets | $ | 1,937,656 | $ | 1,856,646 | |||||
Less: | |||||||||
Goodwill | 25,201 | 25,392 | |||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs) | 7,868 | 8,714 | |||||||
Goodwill-recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets | 12 | — | |||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs)— recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets | 54 | — | |||||||
Related deferred tax assets | 365 | 386 | |||||||
Federal bank regulatory reclassification | — | 5,746 | |||||||
Tangible assets (TA) | $ | 1,904,156 | $ | 1,827,900 | |||||
Risk-weighted assets (RWA) | $ | 1,024,929 | $ | 1,088,526 | |||||
TCE/TA ratio | 6.37 | % | 6.47 | % | |||||
TCE/RWA ratio | 11.83 | % | 10.86 | % | |||||
Capital Resources of Citigroup's Depository Institutions
Citigroup's U.S. subsidiary depository institutions are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the guidelines of the Federal Reserve BankBoard. To be "well capitalized" under current regulatory definitions, Citigroup's depository institutions must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of New York (collectively, the USG) on losses arising onat least 6%, a $301 billion portfolioTotal Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) ratio of Citigroup assets (valuedat least 10%, and a Leverage ratio of at least 5%, and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels.
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, all of Citigroup's U.S. subsidiary depository institutions were "well capitalized" under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, including Citigroup's primary depository institution, Citibank, N.A., as of November 21, 2008, other than as set forth in note 1 to the table below). As shownnoted in the tablefollowing table:
Citibank, N.A. Components of Capital and Ratios Under Regulatory Guidelines
In billions of dollars | Jun. 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Capital | $ | 101.1 | $ | 96.8 | |||
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) | 114.6 | 110.6 | |||||
Tier 1 Capital ratio | 14.16 | % | 13.16 | % | |||
Total Capital ratio | 16.04 | 15.03 | |||||
Leverage ratio(1) | 8.90 | 8.31 | |||||
Similar to pending changes to capital standards applicable to Citigroup and its broker-dealer subsidiaries, as discussed below, as a resultthe capital requirements applicable to Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions may be subject to change in light of receiptactions currently being considered at both the legislative and regulatory levels.
There are various legal and regulatory limitations on the ability of principal repaymentCitigroup's subsidiary depository institutions to pay dividends, extend credit or otherwise supply funds to Citigroup and charge-offs,its non-bank subsidiaries. In determining the total asset pool has declined by approximately $35 billion to approximately $266.4 billion from the original $301 billion.
As consideration for the loss-sharing agreement, Citigroup issued approximately $7.1 billion in preferred stock to the USTdeclaration of dividends, each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and the FDIC,Leverage ratio requirements, as well as a warrant exercisable for common stock to the UST. Of the issuance, $3.617 billion, representing the total fair valuepolicy statements of the issued shares and warrant, was treated as Tier 1 Capital.federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Citigroup did not receive any dividends from its bank subsidiaries during the first six months of 2010.
Terms of AgreementContents
The loss-sharing agreement extendsfollowing table presents the estimated sensitivity of Citigroup's and Citibank, N.A.'s capital ratios to changes of $100 million in Tier 1 Common, Tier 1 Capital, or Total Capital (numerator), or changes of $1 billion in risk-weighted assets or adjusted average total assets (denominator) based on financial information as of June 30, 2010. This information is provided for 10 years for residential assets and five years for non-residential assets. Under the agreement, a "loss" on a portfolio asset is defined to include a charge-off or a realized loss upon collection, through a permitted disposition or exchange, or upon a foreclosure or short-sale loss, but not merely throughpurpose of analyzing the impact that a change in Citigroup's fair value accounting for the asset or the creationCitibank, N.A.'s financial position or increaseresults of operations could have on these ratios. These sensitivities only consider a related loss reserve. Oncesingle change to either a losscomponent of capital, risk-weighted assets, or adjusted average total assets. Accordingly, an event that affects more than one factor may have a larger basis point impact than is recognized under the agreement, the aggregate amount of qualifying losses across the portfolioreflected in a particular period is netted against the aggregate recoveries and gains across the portfolio, all on a pretax basis.this table.
Tier 1 Common ratio | Tier 1 Capital ratio | Total Capital ratio | Leverage ratio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Impact of $100 million change in Tier 1 Common | Impact of $1 billion change in risk-weighted assets | Impact of $100 million change in Tier 1 Capital | Impact of $1 billion change in risk-weighted assets | Impact of $100 million change in Total Capital | Impact of $1 billion change in risk-weighted assets | Impact of $100 million change in Tier 1 Capital | Impact of $1 billion change in adjusted average total assets | ||||||||||||||||||
Citigroup | 1.0 bps | 0.9 bps | 1.0 bps | 1.2 bps | 1.0 bps | 1.5bps | 0.5 bps | 0.3 bps | |||||||||||||||||
Citibank, N.A. | — | — | 1.4 bps | 2.0 bps | 1.4 bps | 2.2 bps | 0.9 bps | 0.8 bps | |||||||||||||||||
Broker-Dealer Subsidiaries
The resulting net loss amount on the portfolio is the basis of the loss-sharing agreement between Citigroup and the USG. Citigroup will bear the first $39.5 billion of such net losses, which amount was determined using (i) an agreed-upon $29 billion of first losses, (ii) Citigroup's then-existing reserve with respect to the portfolio of approximately $9.5 billion, and (iii) an additional $1.0 billion as an agreed-upon amount in exchange for excluding the effects of certain hedge positions from the portfolio. Net losses, if any, on the portfolio after Citigroup's losses exceed the $39.5 billion first-loss amount will be borne 90% by the USG and 10% by Citigroup in the following manner:
Approximately $2.5 billion of GAAP losses on the asset pool were recorded in the second quarter of 2009, bringing the GAAP losses on the portfolio to date to approximately $5.3 billion (i.e., for the period of November 21, 2008 throughAt June 30, 2009). These losses count towards Citigroup's $39.5 billion first-loss position.
The Federal Reserve Bank2010, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., a broker-dealer registered with the SEC that is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of New York will implement its loss-sharing obligations under the agreement by making a loan, after Citigroup's first-loss position and the obligations of the UST and FDIC have been exhausted, in an amount equal to the then aggregate value of the remaining covered asset pool (after reductions for charge-offs, pay-downs and realized losses) as determinedCitigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), had net capital, computed in accordance with the agreement. FollowingSEC's net capital rule, of $8.3 billion, which exceeded the loan, as losses are incurred on the remaining covered asset pool, Citigroup will be required to immediately repay 10%minimum requirement by $7.6 billion.
In addition, certain of such losses to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The loan is non-recourse to Citigroup, other than with respect to the repayment obligation in the preceding sentence and interest on the loan. The loan is recourse only to the remaining covered asset pool, which is the sole collateral to secure the loan. The loan will bear interest at the overnight index swap rate plus 300 basis points.
The covered asset pool includes U.S.-based exposures and transactions that were originated prior to March 14, 2008. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the composition of the covered asset pool, the amount of Citigroup's first-loss position and the premium paid for loss coverageCiti's broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to final confirmation byregulation in the USGother countries in which they do business, including requirements to maintain specified levels of amongnet capital or its equivalent. Citigroup's broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with their capital requirements at June 30, 2010.
Similar to pending changes to capital standards applicable to Citigroup, as discussed under "Regulatory Capital Standards Developments" below, net capital requirements applicable to Citigroup's broker-dealer subsidiaries in the U.S. and other things,jurisdictions may be subject to change in light of the qualificationrecently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Financial Reform Act) and other actions currently being considered at both the legislative and regulatory levels. Citi continues to monitor these developments closely.
Regulatory Capital Standards Developments
The prospective regulatory capital standards for financial institutions are currently subject to significant debate, rulemaking activity and uncertainty, both in the U.S. as well as internationally. Citi continues to monitor these developments closely.
Basel II and III. In late 2005, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee) published a new set of assetsrisk-based capital standards (Basel II) which would permit banks, including Citigroup, to leverage internal risk models used to measure credit, operational, and market risk exposures to drive regulatory capital calculations. In late 2007, the U.S. banking regulators adopted these standards for large banks, including Citigroup. As adopted, the standards require Citigroup, as a large and internationally active bank, to comply with the most advanced Basel II approaches for calculating credit and operational risk capital requirements, which could result in a need for Citigroup to hold additional regulatory capital. The U.S. implementation timetable consists of a parallel calculation period under the asset eligibility criteria, expected lossescurrent regulatory capital regime (Basel I) and reserves. See "Events in 2009—Loss-Sharing Agreement."Basel II followed by a three-year transitional period.
The USG has a 120-day confirmation period to review the composition of the asset pool from the date that Citi submitted its revised asset pool. The revised asset pool was submitted by Citigroupbegan parallel reporting on April 15, 2009. The advisor to the USG has been conducting its review of the assets and it is thus currently expected that the USG will complete its review by August 13, 2009. The final composition of the asset pool1, 2010. There will be established within 90 days afterat least four quarters of parallel reporting before Citi enters the USG completes its review.
The agreement includes guidelines for governance and asset management with respect to the covered asset pool, including reporting requirements and notice and approval rights of the USG at certain thresholds. If covered losses exceed $19 billion, the USG may increase the required reporting or alter the thresholds for notice and approval. If covered losses exceed $27 billion, the USG hasthree-year transitional period. U.S. regulators have reserved the right to change how Basel II is applied in the asset managerU.S. following a review at the end of the second year of the transitional period, and to retain the existing prompt corrective action and leverage capital requirements applicable to banking organizations in the U.S. Citigroup intends to implement Basel II within the timeframe required by the U.S. regulators.
Separate from the Basel II rules for credit and operational risk discussed above, the covered asset pool, among other things.Basel Committee has proposed revisions to the market risk framework that could also lead to additional capital requirements (Basel III). Although not yet ratified by the Basel Committee or U.S. regulators, the Basel III final rules for capital, leverage and liquidity (Basel III introduces new global standards and ratios for liquidity risk measurement) are currently expected to be published by January 2011, one quarter ahead of Citigroup's earliest date for Basel II implementation for credit and operational risk.
Accounting Financial Reform Act. In addition to the implementation of Basel II and RegulatoryBasel III, the Financial Reform Act grants new regulatory authority to various U.S. federal regulators, including the Federal Reserve Board and a newly created Financial Stability Oversight Council (Oversight Council), to impose heightened prudential standards on financial institutions such as Citigroup. These standards could include heightened capital, leverage and liquidity standards, as well as requirements for periodic stress tests. The Federal Reserve Board will also have discretion to impose other prudential standards, including contingent capital requirements, and will retain important flexibility to distinguish among bank holding companies such as Citigroup based on their perceived riskiness, complexity, activities, size and other factors.
In addition, the so-called "Collins Amendment" to the Financial Reform Act will result in new minimum capital requirements for bank holding companies such as Citigroup, and could require Citigroup to replace certain of its outstanding securities that are currently counted towards Citi's Tier 1 Capital Treatmentrequirements, such as trust preferred securities, over a period of time.
General
Citigroup's cash flows and liquidity needs are primarily generated within its operating subsidiaries. Exceptions exist for major corporate items, such as equity and certain long-term debt issuances, which take place at the Citigroup accountscorporate level. Generally, Citi's management of funding and liquidity is designed to optimize availability of funds as needed within Citi's legal and regulatory structure. Due to various constraints that limit certain Citi subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or otherwise make funds available (see "Parameters for Intercompany Funding Transfers" below), Citigroup's primary objectives for funding and liquidity management are established by entity and in aggregate across: (i) the loss-sharing agreementparent holding company/broker dealer subsidiaries; and (ii) bank subsidiaries.
Currently, Citigroup's primary sources of funding include deposits, long-term debt and long-term collateralized financing, and equity, including preferred, trust preferred securities and common stock. This funding is supplemented by modest amounts of short-term borrowings.
Citi views its deposit base as an indemnification agreementits most stable and lowest cost funding source. Citi has focused on maintaining a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base that stood at approximately $814 billion as of June 30, 2010, as compared with $828 billion at March 31, 2010 and $836 billion at December 31, 2009. The sequential decline in deposits primarily resulted from FX translation. Excluding FX translation, Citigroup deposits at June 30, 2010 remained flat as compared with the first quarter of 2010. As stated above, Citigroup's deposits are diversified across products and regions, with approximately 63% outside of the U.S.
At June 30, 2010, long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for Citigroup, Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI) and other Citigroup subsidiaries, collectively, were as follows:
In billions of dollars | Citigroup Parent Company | Other Non-bank | Bank | Total Citigroup(1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Long-term debt(2) | $ | 189.1 | $ | 75.7 | $ | 148.5 | (3) | $ | 413.3 | ||||
Commercial paper | — | 11.2 | 25.2 | 36.4 |
The $36.4 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of June 30, 2010 reflects the consolidation of VIEs pursuant to the guidanceadoption of SFAS 166/167 effective January 1, 2010; the $10.2 billion at December 31, 2009 was pre-adoption. The VIE consolidation led to an increase in FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007),Business Combinations (ASC 805-20-30-18).bank subsidiary commercial paper, while non-bank subsidiarycommercial paper remained at recent levels.
The table below details the long-term debt issuances of Citigroup recorded an assetduring the past five quarters.
In billions of dollars | 2Q09 | 3Q09 | 4Q09 | 1Q10 | 2Q10 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Debt issued under TLGP guarantee | $ | 17.0 | $ | 10.0 | $ | 10.0 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Debt issued without TLGP guarantee: | |||||||||||||||||
Citigroup parent company/CFI | 7.4 | 12.6 | 4.0 | (3) | 1.3 | 5.0 | (3) | ||||||||||
Other Citigroup subsidiaries | 10.1 | (1) | 7.9 | (2) | 5.8 | (4) | 3.7 | (5) | 0.1 | ||||||||
Total(6) | $ | 34.5 | $ | 30.5 | $ | 19.8 | $ | 5.0 | $ | 5.1 | |||||||
See Note 12 to the fair valueConsolidated Financial Statements for further detail on Citigroup's and its affiliates' long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding.
Structural liquidity, defined as the sum of deposits, long-term debt and stockholders' equity as a percentage of total assets, was 71% at June 30, 2010, unchanged as compared with March 31, 2010 and compared with 67% at June 30, 2009.
In addition, one of Citi's key structural liquidity measures is the cash capital ratio. Cash capital is a broader measure of the consideration issuedability to fund the structurally illiquid portion of Citigroup's balance sheet than traditional measures, such as deposits to loans or core deposits to loans. Cash capital measures the amount of long-term funding (>1 year) available to fund illiquid assets. Long-term funding includes core customer deposits, long-term debt and equity. Illiquid assets include loans (net of liquidity adjustments), illiquid securities, securities haircuts and other assets (i.e., goodwill, intangibles, fixed assets, receivables, etc.). At June 30, 2010, the combined Citigroup, the parent holding company, and CGMHI, as well as the aggregate bank subsidiaries had an excess of cash capital. In addition, as of June 30, 2010, the combined Citigroup, the parent holding company, and CGMHI maintained liquidity to meet all maturing obligations significantly in excess of a one-year period without access to the USG, described above) inOther assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The asset will be amortized as anOther operating expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income on a straight-line basis over the coverage periods of 10 years for residential assets and five years for non-residential assets, based on the relative initial principal amounts of eachunsecured wholesale markets.
group. DuringAggregate Liquidity Resources
| Parent & Broker Dealer | Significant Bank Entities | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Jun. 30, 2010 | Mar. 31, 2010 | Jun. 30, 2009 | Jun. 30, 2010 | Mar. 31, 2010 | Jun. 30, 2009 | Jun. 30, 2010 | Mar. 31, 2010 | Jun. 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash at major central banks | $ | 24.7 | $ | 9.5 | $ | 22.5 | $ | 86.0 | $ | 108.9 | $ | 110.0 | $ | 110.7 | $ | 118.4 | $ | 132.5 | ||||||||||
Unencumbered Liquid Securities | 56.8 | 72.8 | 42.5 | 143.4 | 128.7 | 53.3 | 200.2 | 201.5 | 95.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 81.5 | $ | 82.3 | $ | 65.0 | $ | 229.4 | $ | 237.6 | $ | 163.3 | $ | 310.9 | $ | 319.9 | $ | 228.3 | ||||||||||
As noted in the quarter endedtable above, Citigroup's aggregate liquidity resources totaled $310.9 billion as of June 30, 2009, Citigroup recorded $120 million2010, compared with $319.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $228.3 billion at June 30, 2009. Excluding the impact of FX translation, the level of liquidity resources at June 30, 2010 was essentially flat to the prior quarter. These amounts are as anOther operating expense.
Under indemnification accounting, recoveries (gains), if any, will be recognizedof quarter-end, and may increase or decrease intra-quarter and intra-day in the Consolidated Statementordinary course of Income in the same future periods that cumulative losses recorded under U.S. GAAP on the covered assets exceed the $39.5 billion first-loss amount. The Company will recognize and measure an indemnification asset on the same basis that it recognizes losses on the covered assets in the Consolidated Statement of Income. For example, for a covered loan classified as held-for-investment and reported in the balance sheet at amortized cost, the Company would recognize and measure an indemnification asset due from the USG at the same time related loan loss reserves are recorded for that loan equal to 90% of the amount of the loan loss reserve, subject to the first-loss limitation.business.
Under indemnification accounting, recoveries (gains) may be recorded at times when such amounts are not contractually receivable from the USG based on the definition of covered losses in the loss-sharing agreement. Such amounts may or may not thereafter become contractually receivable, depending upon whether or not they become covered "losses" (see above for definition of covered "loss"). Indemnification accounting matches the amount and timing of the recording of recoveries with the amount and timing of the recognition of losses based on the U.S. GAAP accounting for the covered assets, as opposed to the amount and timing of recognition as defined in the loss-sharing agreement. The indemnification asset amount recorded will be adjusted, as appropriate, to take into consideration additional revenue and expense amounts related to the covered assets specifically defined as recoverable or non-recoverable in the loss-sharing program. As of June 30, 2009, the Company has recognized cumulative U.S. GAAP losses on the covered assets that are substantially below our first-loss amount2010, Citigroup's and therefore, no additional indemnification asset has been recognized as of such time.
The fair value of the warrant issued to the UST, which remains outstanding is $88 millionits affiliates' liquidity portfolio and was recorded as a credit toAdditional paid-in capitalbroker-dealer "cash box" totaled $81.5 billion, compared with $82.3 billion at the time of issuance.
The covered assets are risk-weighted at 20% for purposes of calculating the Tier 1 Capital ratioMarch 31, 2010 and $65.0 billion at June 30, 2009. This includes the liquidity portfolio and cash box held in the U.S. as well as government bonds held by Citigroup's broker-dealer entities in the United Kingdom and Japan. Citigroup's bank subsidiaries had an aggregate of approximately $86 billion of cash on deposit with major central banks (including the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the European Central Bank, Bank of England, Swiss National Bank, Bank of Japan, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority), compared with approximately $108.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $110.0 billion at June 30, 2009. These amounts are in addition to cash deposited from the broker-dealer "cash box" noted above.
Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also have significant additional liquidity resources through unencumbered highly liquid securities available for secured funding through private markets or that are, or could be, pledged to the major central banks and the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks. The following table summarizesvalue of these liquid securities was $143.4 billion at June 30, 2010, compared with $128.7 billion at March 31, 2010 and $53.3 billion at June 30, 2009. Significant amounts of cash and liquid securities are also available in other Citigroup entities.
In addition to the assets that were parthighly liquid securities listed above, Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also maintain additional unencumbered securities and loans which are currently pledged to the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks and U.S. Federal Reserve Banks.
Further, Citigroup, as the parent holding company, can transfer funding, subject to certain legal restrictions, to other affiliated entities, including its bank subsidiaries. Citi's non-bank subsidiaries, such as its broker-dealer subsidiaries, can also transfer excess liquidity to the parent holding company through termination of intercompany borrowings, and to the parent holding company and other affiliates, including Citi's bank subsidiaries. In addition, Citigroup's bank subsidiaries, including Citibank, N.A., can lend to Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries in accordance with Section 23A of the covered asset pool agreedFederal Reserve Act. As of June 30, 2010, the amount available for lending under Section 23A was approximately $26 billion, provided the funds are collateralized appropriately.
Funding Outlook
Based on the current status of Citi's aggregate liquidity resources discussed above, as well as Citi's continued deleveraging, stability in its deposit base to between Citigroupdate, and its increased structural liquidity over the USGprior two years, Citi currently expects to refinance only a portion of its long-term debt maturing in 2010. In addition, Citi does not currently expect to refinance its TLGP debt as of January 16, 2009, with their values as of November 21, 2008 (except asit matures (as set forth in note 2 of the notelong-term debt above). However, as part of its efforts to maintain and solidify its structural liquidity, as well as extend the table below), andduration of liabilities supporting its businesses, for the balances asfull year of June 30, 2009, reflecting changes2010, Citi currently expects to issue approximately $18 billion to $21 billion in the balances of assetslong-term debt (excluding local country debt) an amount that remained qualified, plus approximately $10is $3 billion to $6 billion higher than previously-stated estimates. This $18 billion to $21 billion of new replacement assets that Citi substituted for non-qualifying assets. The $266.4expected issuance is less than the $35 billion of covered assets at June 30, 2009 are recorded inexpected maturities during the year (excluding local country debt). Citi Holdings within Local Consumer Lending ($183.2 billion)continues to review its funding and Special Asset Pool ($83.2 billion). The asset pool, as revised, remains subjectliquidity needs and may adjust its expected issuances for the remainder of 2010 due to the USG's final review process, anticipated to be completed by August 13, 2009, with final composition of the asset pool established within 90 days after the USG's completion of its review.market conditions or regulatory requirements, among other factors.
Assets
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | November 21, 2008(1)(2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loans: | ||||||||
First mortgages | $ | 86.0 | $ | 98.0 | ||||
Second mortgages | 52.0 | 55.4 | ||||||
Retail auto loans | 12.9 | 16.2 | ||||||
Other consumer loans | 18.4 | 19.7 | ||||||
Total consumer loans | $ | 169.3 | $ | 189.3 | ||||
CRE loans | $ | 11.4 | $ | 12.0 | ||||
Highly leveraged finance loans | 1.3 | 2.0 | ||||||
Other corporate loans | 12.2 | 14.0 | ||||||
Total corporate loans | $ | 24.9 | $ | 28.0 | ||||
Securities: | ||||||||
Alt-A | $ | 9.5 | $ | 11.4 | ||||
SIVs | 5.9 | 6.1 | ||||||
CRE | 1.6 | 1.4 | ||||||
Other | 9.0 | 11.2 | ||||||
Total securities | $ | 26.0 | $ | 30.1 | ||||
Unfunded lending commitments (ULC) | ||||||||
Second mortgages | $ | 19.6 | $ | 22.4 | ||||
Other consumer loans | 2.6 | 3.6 | ||||||
Highly leveraged finance | 0.0 | 0.1 | ||||||
CRE | 4.2 | 5.5 | ||||||
Other commitments | 19.8 | 22.0 | ||||||
Total ULC | $ | 46.2 | $ | 53.6 | ||||
Total covered assets | $ | 266.4 | $ | 301.0 | ||||
Implementation and Management of TARP ProgramsCredit Ratings
AfterCitigroup's ability to access the capital markets and other sources of funds, as well as the cost of these funds and its ability to maintain certain deposits, is dependent on its credit ratings. The table below indicates the current ratings for Citigroup. As a result of the Citigroup receivedguarantee, changes in ratings for Citigroup Funding Inc. are the TARP capital, it established a Special TARP Committee composedsame as those of senior executivesCitigroup.
Citigroup's Debt Ratings as of June 30, 2010
Citigroup Inc. | Citigroup Funding Inc. | Citibank, N.A. | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Senior debt | Commercial paper | Senior debt | Commercial paper | Long- term | Short- term | |||||||
Fitch Ratings | A+ | F1+ | A+ | F1+ | A+ | F1+ | ||||||
Moody's Investors Service | A3 | P-1 | A3 | P-1 | A1 | P-1 | ||||||
Standard & Poor's (S&P) | A | A-1 | A | A-1 | A+ | A-1 | ||||||
The credit rating agencies included in the chart above have each indicated that they are evaluating the impact of the Financial Reform Act on the rating support assumptions currently included in their methodologies as related to approve, monitor and track how the fundslarge bank holding companies. These evaluations are utilized. Citi is required to adhere to the following objectivesgenerally as a conditionresult of agencies' belief that the Financial Reform Act increases the uncertainty regarding the U.S. government's willingness to provide extraordinary support to such companies. Consistent with such belief and to bring Citi in line with other large banks, S&P and Moody's revised their outlooks on Citigroup's supported ratings from stable to negative in February and July of 2010, respectively. The credit rating agencies have generally indicated that their evaluations of the USG's capital investment:
The Committee has established specific guidelines, which are consistent with the objectives and spiritcompletion of the program. Pursuantevaluations, as well as the outcomes, is uncertain.
Ratings downgrades by Fitch Ratings, Moody's Investors Service or Standard & Poor's could have material impacts on funding and liquidity through cash obligations, reduced funding capacity and due to these guidelines, Citi will use TARP capital only for those purposes expressly approvedcollateral triggers. Because of the current credit ratings of Citigroup Inc., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating may or may not impact Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating by the Committee. TARP capital will not be used for compensation and bonuses, dividend payments, lobbying or government relations activities, or any activities related to marketing, advertising and corporate sponsorship. TARP capital will be used exclusively to support assets and not for expenses.
Committee approval is the final stage in a four-step review process to evaluate proposals from Citi businesses for the use of TARP capital, considering the risk, the potential financial impact and returns.
On May 12, 2009, Citi published its quarterly report summarizing its TARP spending initiatives for the first quarter of 2009 (the report is available at www.citigroup.com). The report states that the Committee has authorized $44.75 billion in initiatives backed by TARP capital which has subsequently been increased to $50.8 billion.one notch. As of June 30, 2009,2010, Citi currently believes that a one-notch downgrade of both the Company has deployed approximately $15.1billionsenior debt/long-term rating of funds underCitigroup Inc. and a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating could result in the approved initiatives.assumed loss of unsecured commercial paper ($10.6 billion) and tender option bonds funding ($1.9 billion) as well as derivative triggers and additional margin requirements ($1.0 billion).
Additionally, other funding sources, such as repurchase agreements and other margin requirements for which there are no explicit triggers, could be adversely affected. The aggregate liquidity resources of Citigroup's parent holding company and broker-dealer stood at $83.6 billion as of June 30, 2010, in part as a contingency for such an event, and a broad range of mitigating actions are currently included in the Citigroup Contingency Funding Plan. These mitigating factors include, but are not limited to, accessing funding capacity from existing clients, diversifying funding sources, adjusting the size of select trading books, and tailoring levels of reverse repurchase agreement lending.
Citi currently believes that a more severe ratings downgrade scenario, such as a two-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc., accompanied by a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating, could result in an additional $1.6 billion in funding requirement in the form of cash obligations and collateral.
Further, as of June 30, 2010, a one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term ratings of Citibank, N.A. could result in an approximate $3.6 billion funding requirement in the form of collateral and cash obligations. Because of the current credit ratings of Citibank, N.A., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating is unlikely to have any impact on its commercial paper/short-term rating. The significant bank entities, Citibank, N.A., and other bank vehicles have aggregate liquidity resources of $229 billion, and have a detailed contingency funding plan that encompasses a broad range of mitigating actions.
OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance-sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs), primarily in connection with securitization activities inRegional Consumer Banking andInstitutional Clients Group. Citigroup and its subsidiaries use SPEs principally to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroup's financial assets, assisting clients in securitizing their financial assets and creating investment products for clients. The adoption of SFAS 166/167, effective on January 1, 2010, caused certain SPEs, including credit card receivables securitization trusts and asset-backed commercial paper conduits, to be consolidated in Citi's Financial Statements. For further information on Citi's securitization activities and involvement in SPEs, see Notes 1 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Citigroup's risk management framework balances strong corporate oversight with well-defined independent risk management functions for each business and region, as well as cross-business product expertise. The Citigroup risk management framework is described in Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
DETAILS OF
CREDIT LOSS EXPERIENCERISK
During the second quarter of 2010, Citigroup's aggregate loan portfolio decreased by $29.6 billion to $692.2 billion. Citi's total allowance for loan losses totaled $46.2 billion at June 30, 2010, a coverage ratio of 6.72% of total loans, down from 6.80% at March 31, 2010 and up from 5.60% in the second quarter of 2009.
During the second quarter of 2010, Citigroup recorded a net release of $1.5 billion to its credit reserves and allowance for unfunded lending commitments, compared to a $3.9 billion build in the second quarter of 2009. The release consisted of a net release of $683 million for corporate loans ($253 million release inICG and approximately $400 million release inSAP), and a net release of $827 million for consumer loans, mainly for Retail Partner Cards in Citi Holdings,LATAM RCB andAsia RCB (mainly a $412 million release inRCB and a $421 million release inLCL). Despite the reserve release for consumer loans, the coincident months of coverage of the consumer portfolio increased from 15.5 to 15.9 months, significantly higher than the year-ago level of 12.7 months.
Net credit losses of $8.0 billion during the second quarter of 2010 decreased $3.5 billion from year-ago levels (on a managed basis). The decrease consisted of a net decrease of $2.2 billion for consumer loans (mainly a $1.9 billion decrease inLCL and a $321 million decrease inRCB) and a decrease of $1.3 billion for corporate loans ($1.2 billion decrease inSAP and a $126 million decrease inICG).
Consumer non-accrual loans (which excludes credit card receivables) totaled $13.8 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $15.6 billion at March 31, 2010 and $15.8 billion at June 30, 2009. The consumer loan 90 days or more delinquency rate was 3.67% at June 30, 2010, compared to 4.01% at March 31, 2010 and 3.68% a year ago. The 30 to 89 days past due consumer loan delinquency rate was 3.06% at June 30, 2010, compared to 3.19% at March 31, 2010 and 3.41% a year ago. During the second quarter of 2010, both early- and later-stage delinquencies declined across most of the consumer loan portfolios, driven by improvement in North America mortgages. Delinquencies declined in first mortgages, entirely as a result of asset sales and loans moving from the trial period under the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to permanent modification.
Corporate non-accrual loans were $11.0 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $12.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $12.5 billion a year ago. The decrease from the prior quarter was mainly due to loan sales, write-offs and paydowns, which were partially offset by increases due to weakening of certain borrowers.
See below for a discussion of Citi's loan and credit accounting policies.
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 1st Qtr. 2009 | 4th Qtr. 2008 | 3rd Qtr. 2008 | 2nd Qtr. 2008 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period | $ | 31,703 | $ | 29,616 | $ | 24,005 | $ | 20,777 | $ | 18,257 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | $ | 10,010 | $ | 8,010 | $ | 8,592 | $ | 7,831 | $ | 6,194 | |||||||||
Corporate | 2,223 | 1,905 | 3,579 | 1,112 | 789 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 12,233 | $ | 9,915 | $ | 12,171 | $ | 8,943 | $ | 6,983 | ||||||||||
Gross credit losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer(1) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 4,694 | $ | 4,124 | $ | 3,610 | $ | 3,073 | $ | 2,584 | |||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 2,305 | 1,936 | 1,818 | 1,914 | 1,798 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | 1,216 | 1,176 | 364 | 156 | 190 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 558 | 424 | 756 | 200 | 197 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 8,773 | $ | 7,660 | $ | 6,548 | $ | 5,343 | $ | 4,769 | ||||||||||
Credit recoveries | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 131 | $ | 136 | $ | 132 | $ | 137 | $ | 145 | |||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 261 | 213 | 219 | 252 | 289 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | 20 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 6 | 28 | 52 | 31 | 23 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 418 | $ | 378 | $ | 405 | $ | 423 | $ | 459 | ||||||||||
Net credit losses | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 5,759 | $ | 5,163 | $ | 3,840 | $ | 3,089 | $ | 2,627 | |||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 2,596 | 2,119 | 2,303 | 1,831 | 1,683 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 8,355 | $ | 7,282 | $ | 6,143 | $ | 4,920 | $ | 4,310 | |||||||||
Other—net(2)(3)(4)(5)(6) | $ | 359 | $ | (546 | ) | $ | (417 | ) | $ | (795 | ) | $ | (153 | ) | |||||
Allowance for loan losses at end of period | $ | 35,940 | $ | 31,703 | $ | 29,616 | $ | 24,005 | $ | 20,777 | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans | 5.60 | % | 4.82 | % | 4.27 | % | 3.35 | % | 2.78 | % | |||||||||
Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(7) | $ | 1,082 | $ | 947 | $ | 887 | $ | 957 | $ | 1,107 | |||||||||
Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments | $ | 37,022 | $ | 32,650 | $ | 30,503 | $ | 24,962 | $ | 21,884 | |||||||||
Net consumer credit losses | $ | 6,607 | $ | 5,711 | $ | 5,077 | $ | 4,598 | $ | 3,948 | |||||||||
As a percentage of average consumer loans | 5.88 | % | 4.95 | % | 4.12 | % | 3.57 | % | 2.95 | % | |||||||||
Net corporate credit losses/(recoveries) | $ | 1,748 | $ | 1,571 | $ | 1,066 | $ | 322 | $ | 362 | |||||||||
As a percentage of average corporate loans | 0.89 | % | 0.79 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.16 | % | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses at end of period(8) | |||||||||||||||||||
Citicorp | $ | 10,046 | $ | 8,520 | $ | 7,684 | $ | 6,651 | $ | 6,143 | |||||||||
Citi Holdings | 25,894 | 23,183 | 21,932 | 17,354 | 14,634 | ||||||||||||||
Total Citigroup | $ | 35,940 | $ | 31,703 | $ | 29,616 | $ | 24,005 | $ | 20,777 | |||||||||
In millions of dollars at year end | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Consumer loans | |||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage and real estate(1) | $ | 171,102 | $ | 180,334 | $ | 183,842 | $ | 191,748 | $ | 197,358 | |||||||
Installment, revolving credit, and other | 61,867 | 69,111 | 58,099 | 57,820 | 61,645 | ||||||||||||
Cards | 125,337 | 127,818 | 28,951 | 36,039 | 33,750 | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 5,540 | 5,386 | 5,640 | 5,848 | 6,016 | ||||||||||||
Lease financing | 6 | 7 | 11 | 15 | 16 | ||||||||||||
$ | 363,852 | $ | 382,656 | $ | 276,543 | $ | 291,470 | $ | 298,785 | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage and real estate (1) | $ | 47,921 | $ | 49,421 | $ | 47,297 | $ | 47,568 | $ | 45,986 | |||||||
Installment, revolving credit, and other | 38,115 | 44,541 | 42,805 | 45,004 | 45,556 | ||||||||||||
Cards | 37,510 | 38,191 | 41,493 | 41,443 | 42,262 | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 16,420 | 14,828 | 14,780 | 14,858 | 13,858 | ||||||||||||
Lease financing | 677 | 771 | 331 | 345 | 339 | ||||||||||||
$ | 140,643 | $ | 147,752 | $ | 146,706 | $ | 149,218 | $ | 148,001 | ||||||||
Total consumer loans | $ | 504,495 | $ | 530,408 | $ | 423,249 | $ | 440,688 | $ | 446,786 | |||||||
Unearned income | 951 | 1,061 | 808 | 803 | 866 | ||||||||||||
Consumer loans, net of unearned income | $ | 505,446 | $ | 531,469 | $ | 424,057 | $ | 441,491 | $ | 447,652 | |||||||
Corporate loans | |||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 11,656 | $ | 15,558 | $ | 15,614 | $ | 19,692 | $ | 26,125 | |||||||
Loans to financial institutions | 31,450 | 31,279 | 6,947 | 7,666 | 8,181 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage and real estate (1) | 22,453 | 21,283 | 22,560 | 23,221 | 23,862 | ||||||||||||
Installment, revolving credit, and other | 14,812 | 15,792 | 17,737 | 17,734 | 19,856 | ||||||||||||
Lease financing | 1,244 | 1,239 | 1,297 | 1,275 | 1,284 | ||||||||||||
$ | 81,615 | $ | 85,151 | $ | 64,155 | $ | 69,588 | $ | 79,308 | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 65,615 | $ | 64,903 | $ | 68,467 | $ | 73,564 | $ | 78,512 | |||||||
Installment, revolving credit, and other | 11,174 | 10,956 | 9,683 | 10,949 | 11,638 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage and real estate (1) | 7,301 | 9,771 | 9,779 | 12,023 | 11,887 | ||||||||||||
Loans to financial institutions | 20,646 | 19,003 | 15,113 | 16,906 | 15,856 | ||||||||||||
Lease financing | 582 | 663 | 1,295 | 1,462 | 1,560 | ||||||||||||
Governments and official institutions | 1,046 | 1,324 | 1,229 | 826 | 713 | ||||||||||||
$ | 106,364 | $ | 106,620 | $ | 105,566 | $ | 115,730 | $ | 120,166 | ||||||||
Total corporate loans | $ | 187,979 | $ | 191,771 | $ | 169,721 | $ | 185,318 | $ | 199,474 | |||||||
Unearned income | (1,259 | ) | (1,436 | ) | (2,274 | ) | (4,598 | ) | (5,436 | ) | |||||||
Corporate loans, net of unearned income | $ | 186,720 | $ | 190,335 | $ | 167,447 | $ | 180,720 | $ | 194,038 | |||||||
Total loans—net of unearned income | $ | 692,166 | $ | 721,804 | $ | 591,504 | $ | 622,211 | $ | 641,690 | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses—on drawn exposures | (46,197 | ) | (48,746 | ) | (36,033 | ) | (36,416 | ) | (35,940 | ) | |||||||
Total loans—net of unearned income and allowance for credit losses | $ | 645,969 | $ | 673,058 | $ | 555,471 | $ | 585,795 | $ | 605,750 | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans—net of unearned income(2) | 6.72 | % | 6.80 | % | 6.09 | % | 5.85 | % | 5.60 | % | |||||||
Allowance for consumer loan losses as a percentage of total consumer loans—net of unearned income(2) | 7.87 | % | 7.84 | % | 6.70 | % | 6.44 | % | 6.25 | % | |||||||
Allowance for corporate loan losses as a percentage of total corporate loans—net of unearned income(2) | 3.59 | % | 3.90 | % | 4.56 | % | 4.42 | % | 4.11 | % | |||||||
Certain lending products included in the loan table above have terms that may give rise to additional credit issues. Credit cards with below-market introductory interest rates, multiple loans supported by the same collateral (e.g., home equity loans), and interest-only loans are examples of such products. However, Citi does not believe these products are material to its financial position and results and are closely managed via credit controls that mitigate the additional inherent risk.
Impaired Loans
Impaired loans are those where Citigroup believes it is probable that it will not collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include corporate non-accrual loans as well as smaller-balance homogeneous loans whose terms have been modified due to the borrower's financial difficulties and Citigroup granted a concession to the borrower. Such modifications may include interest rate reductions and/or principal forgiveness. Valuation allowances for impaired loans are estimated considering all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value
of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's original contractual effective rate, the secondary market value of the loan and the fair value of collateral less disposal costs. Consumer impaired loans exclude smaller-balance homogeneous loans that have not been modified and are carried on a non-accrual basis, as well as substantially all loans modified for periods of 12 months or less. As of June 30, 2010, loans included in those short-term programs amounted to $7 billion.
The following table presents information about impaired loans:
In millions of dollars at year end | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-accrual corporate loans | ||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 6,565 | $ | 6,347 | ||||
Loans to financial institutions | 478 | 1,794 | ||||||
Mortgage and real estate | 2,568 | 4,051 | ||||||
Lease financing | 58 | — | ||||||
Other | 1,367 | 1,287 | ||||||
Total non-accrual corporate loans | $ | 11,036 | $ | 13,479 | ||||
Impaired consumer loans(1) | ||||||||
Mortgage and real estate | $ | 16,094 | $ | 10,629 | ||||
Installment and other | 4,440 | 3,853 | ||||||
Cards | 5,028 | 2,453 | ||||||
Total impaired consumer loans | $ | 25,562 | $ | 16,935 | ||||
Total(2) | $ | 36,598 | $ | 30,414 | ||||
Non-accrual corporate loans with valuation allowances | $ | 7,035 | $ | 8,578 | ||||
Impaired consumer loans with valuation allowances | 25,143 | 16,453 | ||||||
Non-accrual corporate valuation allowance | $ | 2,355 | $ | 2,480 | ||||
Impaired consumer valuation allowance | 7,540 | 4,977 | ||||||
Total valuation allowances (3) | $ | 9,895 | $ | 7,457 | ||||
Loan Accounting Policies
The following are Citigroup's accounting policies for loans, allowance for loan losses and related lending activities.
Loans
Loans are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income and unamortized deferred fees and costs except that credit card receivable balances also include accrued interest and fees. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are generally deferred and recognized as adjustments to income over the lives of the related loans.
As described in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Citi has elected fair value accounting for certain loans. Such loans are carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings. Interest income on such loans is recorded inInterest revenue at the contractually specified rate.
Loans for which the fair value option has not been elected are classified upon origination or acquisition as either held-for-investment or held-for-sale. This classification is based on management's initial intent and ability with regard to those loans.
Loans that are held-for-investment are classified asLoans, net of unearned income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and the related cash flows are included within the cash flows from investing activities category in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on the lineChange in loans. However, when the initial intent for holding a loan has changed from held-for-investment to held-for-sale, the loan is reclassified to held-for-sale, but the related cash flows continue to be reported in cash flows from investing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on the lineProceeds from sales and securitizations of loans.
Substantially all of the consumer loans sold or securitized by Citigroup are U.S. prime residential mortgage loans or U.S. credit card receivables. The practice of the U.S. prime mortgage business has been to sell all of its loans except for non-conforming adjustable rate loans. U.S. prime mortgage conforming loans are classified as held-for-sale at the time of origination. The related cash flows are classified in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in the cash flows from operating activities category on the lineChange in loans held-for-sale.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 in 2010, U.S. credit card receivables were classified at origination as loans-held-for-sale to the extent that management did not have the intent to hold the receivables for the foreseeable future or until maturity. Prior to 2010, the U.S. credit card securitization forecast for the three months following the latest balance sheet date, excluding replenishments, was the basis for the amount of such loans classified as held-for-sale. Cash flows related to U.S. credit card loans classified as held-for-sale at origination or acquisition are reported in the cash flows from operating activities category on the lineChange in loans held-for-sale.
Consumer loans
Consumer loans represent loans and leases managed primarily by theRegional Consumer Banking andLocal Consumer Lending businesses. As a general rule, interest accrual ceases for installment and real estate (both open- and closed-end) loans when payments are 90 days contractually past due. For credit cards and unsecured revolving loans, however, Citi generally accrues interest until payments are 180 days past due. Loans that have been modified to grant a short-term or long-term concession to a borrower who is in financial difficulty may not be accruing interest at the time of the modification. The policy for returning such modified loans to accrual status varies by product and/or region. In most cases, a minimum number of payments (ranging from one to six) are required, while in other cases the loan is never returned to accrual status.
Citi's charge-off policies follow the general guidelines below:
Corporate loans
Corporate loans represent loans and leases managed byICG or theSpecial Asset Pool. Corporate loans are identified as impaired and placed on a cash (non-accrual) basis when it is determined, based on actual experience and a forward-looking assessment of the collectability of the loan in full, that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful or when interest or principal is 90 days past due, except when the loan is well-collateralized and in the process of collection. Any interest accrued on impaired corporate loans and leases is reversed at 90 days and charged against current earnings, and interest is thereafter included in earnings only to the extent actually received in cash. When there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of principal, all cash receipts are thereafter applied to reduce the recorded investment in the loan.
Impaired corporate loans and leases are written down to the extent that principal is judged to be uncollectible. Impaired collateral-dependent loans and leases, where repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying collateral and there are no other available and reliable sources of repayment, are written down to the lower of cost or collateral value. Cash-basis loans are returned to an accrual status when all contractual principal and interest amounts are reasonably assured of repayment and there is a sustained period of repayment performance in accordance with the contractual terms.
Loans Held-for-Sale
Corporate and consumer loans that have been identified for sale are classified as loans held-for-sale included inOther assets. With the exception of certain mortgage loans for which the fair value option has been elected, these loans are accounted for at the lower of cost or market value (LOCOM), with any write-downs or subsequent recoveries charged toOther revenue.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Allowance for loan losses represents management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio, as well as probable losses related to large individually evaluated impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes only, and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable loan losses inherent in the overall portfolio. Additions to the allowance are made through the provision for loan losses. Loan losses are deducted from the allowance, and subsequent recoveries are added. Securities received in exchange for loan claims in debt restructurings are initially recorded at fair value, with any gain or loss reflected as a recovery or charge-off to the allowance, and are subsequently accounted for as securities available-for-sale.
Corporate loans
In the corporate portfolios, the allowance for loan losses includes an asset-specific component and a statistically-based component. The asset-specific component is calculated under ASC 310-10-35,Receivables—Subsequent Measurement (formerly SFAS 114) on an individual basis for larger-balance, non-homogeneous loans, which are reservesconsidered impaired. An asset-specific allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value (less disposal costs), or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than its carrying value. This allowance considers the borrower's overall financial condition, resources, and payment record, the prospects for Troubled Debt Restructuringssupport from any financially responsible guarantors (discussed further below) and, if appropriate, the realizable value of any collateral. The asset-specific component of the allowance for smaller balance impaired loans is calculated on a pool basis considering historical loss experience. The allowance for the remainder of the loan portfolio is calculated under ASC 450,Contingencies (formerly SFAS 5) using a statistical methodology, supplemented by management judgment. The statistical analysis considers the portfolio's size, remaining tenor, and credit quality as measured by internal risk ratings assigned to individual credit facilities, which reflect probability of default and loss given default. The statistical analysis considers historical default rates and historical loss severity in the event of default, including historical average levels and historical variability. The result is an estimated range for inherent losses. The best estimate within the range is then determined by management's quantitative and qualitative assessment of current conditions, including general economic conditions, specific industry and geographic trends, and internal factors including portfolio concentrations, trends in internal credit quality indicators, and current and past underwriting standards.
For both the asset-specific and the statistically-based components of the allowance for loan losses, management may incorporate guarantor support. The financial wherewithal of the guarantor is evaluated, as applicable, based on net worth, cash flow statements and personal or company financial statements which are updated and reviewed at least annually. Typically, a guarantee arrangement is used to facilitate cooperation in a restructuring situation. A guarantor's reputation and willingness to work with Citigroup is evaluated based on the historical experience with the guarantor and the knowledge of the marketplace. In the rare event that the guarantor is unwilling or unable to perform or facilitate borrower cooperation, Citi pursues a legal remedy. If Citi does not pursue a legal remedy, it is because Citi does not believe the guarantor has the financial wherewithal to perform regardless of legal action, or because there are legal limitations on simultaneously pursuing guarantors and foreclosure. A guarantor's reputation does not typically impact our decision or ability to seek performance under guarantee.
In cases where a guarantee is a factor in the assessment of loan losses, it is typically included via adjustment to the loan's internal risk rating, which in turn is the basis for the adjustment to the statistically-based component of the allowance for loan losses. To date, it is only in rare circumstances that an impaired commercial or CRE loan is carried at a value in excess of the appraised value due to a guarantee.
When Citi's monitoring of the loan indicates that the guarantor's wherewithal to pay is uncertain or has deteriorated, there is either no change in the risk rating, because the guarantor's credit support was never initially factored in, or the risk rating is adjusted to reflect that uncertainty or deterioration. Accordingly, a guarantor's ultimate failure to perform or a lack of legal enforcement of the guarantee does not materially impact the allowance for loan losses, as there is typically no further significant adjustment of the loan's risk rating at that time.
Consumer loans
ForConsumer loans, each portfolio of smaller-balance, homogeneous loans—including consumer mortgage, installment, revolving credit, and most other consumer loans—is independently evaluated for impairment. The allowance for loan losses attributed to these loans is established via a process that estimates the probable losses inherent in the specific portfolio based upon various analyses. These include migration analysis, in which historical delinquency and credit loss experience is applied to the current aging of the portfolio, together with analyses that reflect current trends and conditions.
Management also considers overall portfolio indicators, including historical credit losses, delinquent, non-performing, and classified loans, trends in volumes and terms of loans, an evaluation of overall credit quality, the credit process, including lending policies and procedures, and economic, geographical, product and other environmental factors. In addition, valuation allowances are determined for impaired smaller-balance homogeneous loans whose terms have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and where it has been determined that a concession was granted to the borrower. Such modifications may include interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness and/or term extensions. Where long-term concessions have been granted, such modifications are accounted for as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). The allowance for loan losses for TDRs is determined in accordance with ASC-310-10-35 by comparing expected cash flows of $3,810 million, $2,760 million, $2,180 million, $1,443 million,the loans discounted at the loans' original effective interest rates to the carrying value of the loans. Where short-term concessions have been granted, the allowance for loan losses is materially consistent with the requirements of ASC-310-10-35.
Loans included in the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) trial period are not classified as modified under short-term or long-term programs, and $882 million asthe allowance for loan losses for these loans is calculated under ASC 450-20. The allowance calculation for HAMP trial loans uses default rates that assume that the borrower will not successfully complete the trial period and receive a permanent modification. As of June 30, 2010, of the loans in which the trial period has ended, 37% of the loan balances were successfully modified under HAMP, 12% were modified under the Citi Supplemental program, 6% received HAMP Re-age, (each as described under Consumer Loan Modification Programs) and 45% did not receive any modification from Citi to date.
Reserve Estimates and Policies
Management provides reserves for an estimate of probable losses inherent in the funded loan portfolio on the balance sheet in the form of an allowance for loan losses. These reserves are established in accordance with Citigroup's Credit Reserve Policies, as approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Citi's Chief Risk Officer and Chief Financial Officer review the adequacy of the credit loss reserves each quarter with representatives from the Risk Management and Finance staffs for each applicable business area.
The above-mentioned representatives covering the business areas having classifiably managed portfolios, where internal credit-risk ratings are assigned (primarilyICG, Regional Consumer Banking andLocal Consumer Lending), or modified consumer loans, where concessions were granted due to the borrowers' financial difficulties present recommended reserve balances for their funded and unfunded lending portfolios along with supporting quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data include:
In addition, representatives from both the Risk Management and Finance staffs that cover business areas that have delinquency-managed portfolios containing smaller homogeneous loans present their recommended reserve balances based upon leading credit indicators, including loan delinquencies and changes in portfolio size as well as economic trends including housing prices, unemployment and GDP. This methodology is applied separately for each individual product within each different geographic region in which these portfolios exist.
This evaluation process is subject to numerous estimates and judgments. The frequency of default, risk ratings, loss recovery rates, the size and diversity of individual large credits, and the ability of borrowers with foreign currency obligations to obtain the foreign currency necessary for orderly debt servicing, among other things, are all taken into account during this review. Changes in these estimates could have a direct impact on the credit costs in any quarter and could result in a change in the allowance. Changes to the reserve flow through the Consolidated Statement of Income on the lineProvision for loan losses.
Allowance for Unfunded Lending Commitments
A similar approach to the allowance for loan losses is used for calculating a reserve for the expected losses related to unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit. This reserve is classified on the balance sheet inOther liabilities. Changes to the allowance for unfunded lending commitments flow through the Consolidated Statement of Income on the lineProvision for unfunded lending commitments.
Details of Credit Loss Experience
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period | $ | 48,746 | $ | 36,033 | $ | 36,416 | $ | 35,940 | $ | 31,703 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | $ | 6,672 | $ | 8,244 | $ | 7,077 | $ | 7,321 | $ | 10,010 | |||||||||
Corporate | (149 | ) | 122 | 764 | 1,450 | 2,223 | |||||||||||||
$ | 6,523 | $ | 8,366 | $ | 7,841 | $ | 8,771 | $ | 12,233 | ||||||||||
Gross credit losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 6,494 | $ | 6,942 | $ | 4,360 | $ | 4,459 | $ | 4,694 | |||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 1,774 | 1,797 | 2,187 | 2,406 | 2,305 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | 563 | 404 | 478 | 1,101 | 1,216 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 290 | 155 | 877 | 483 | 558 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 9,121 | $ | 9,298 | $ | 7,902 | $ | 8,449 | $ | 8,773 | ||||||||||
Credit recoveries | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 460 | $ | 419 | $ | 160 | $ | 149 | $ | 131 | |||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 318 | 300 | 327 | 288 | 261 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | 307 | 177 | 246 | 30 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 74 | 18 | 34 | 13 | 22 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 1,159 | $ | 914 | $ | 767 | $ | 480 | $ | 418 | ||||||||||
Net credit losses | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 6,290 | $ | 6,750 | $ | 4,432 | $ | 5,381 | $ | 5,775 | |||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 1,672 | 1,634 | 2,703 | 2,588 | 2,580 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 7,962 | $ | 8,384 | $ | 7,135 | $ | 7,969 | $ | 8,355 | |||||||||
Other—net(1)(2)(3)(4)(5) | $ | (1,110 | ) | $ | 12,731 | $ | (1,089 | ) | $ | (326 | ) | $ | 359 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses at end of period(6) | $ | 46,197 | $ | 48,746 | $ | 36,033 | $ | 36,416 | $ | 35,940 | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans | 6.72 | % | 6.80 | % | 6.09 | % | 5.85 | % | 5.60 | % | |||||||||
Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(7) | $ | 1,054 | $ | 1,122 | $ | 1,157 | $ | 1,074 | $ | 1,082 | |||||||||
Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments | $ | 47,251 | $ | 49,868 | $ | 37,190 | $ | 37,490 | $ | 37,022 | |||||||||
Net consumer credit losses | $ | 7,490 | $ | 8,020 | $ | 6,060 | $ | 6,428 | $ | 6,607 | |||||||||
As a percentage of average consumer loans | 5.75 | % | 6.04 | % | 5.43 | % | 5.66 | % | 5.88 | % | |||||||||
Net corporate credit losses | $ | 472 | $ | 364 | $ | 1,075 | $ | 1,541 | $ | 1,748 | |||||||||
As a percentage of average corporate loans | 0.25 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.61 | % | 0.82 | % | 0.89 | % | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses at end of period(8) | |||||||||||||||||||
Citicorp | $ | 17,524 | $ | 18,503 | $ | 10,731 | $ | 10,956 | $ | 10,676 | |||||||||
Citi Holdings | 28,673 | 30,243 | 25,302 | 25,460 | 25,264 | ||||||||||||||
Total Citigroup | $ | 46,197 | $ | 48,746 | $ | 36,033 | $ | 36,416 | $ | 35,940 | |||||||||
Allowance by type | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer(9) | $ | 39,578 | $ | 41,422 | $ | 28,397 | $ | 28,420 | $ | 27,969 | |||||||||
Corporate | 6,619 | 7,324 | 7,636 | 7,996 | 7,971 | ||||||||||||||
Total Citigroup | $ | 46,197 | $ | 48,746 | $ | 36,033 | $ | 36,416 | $ | 35,940 | |||||||||
NON-PERFORMING ASSETS (NON-ACCRUAL LOANS, OTHER REAL ESTATE OWNED AND OTHER REPOSSESSED ASSETS)
Non-Accrual Assets
The table below summarizes Citigroup's view of non-accrual loans as of the Company's non-accrual loans. Theseperiods indicated. Non-accrual loans are loans in which the borrower has fallen behind in interest payments or, for corporate loans, where the CompanyCiti has determined that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful, and which are nowtherefore considered impaired. InAs discussed under "Loan Accounting Policies" above, in situations where the CompanyCiti reasonably expects that only a portion of the principal and interest owed will ultimately be collected, all payments received are reflected as a reduction of principal and not as interest income. There is no industry-wide definition of non-accrual assets, however, and as such, analysis across the industry is not always comparable.
Corporate non-accrual loans may still be current on interest payments. Consistent with industry conventions, Citi generally accrues interest on credit card loans until such loans are charged-off, which typically occurs at 180 days' contractual delinquency. As such, the non-accrual loan disclosures in this section do not include credit card loans.
Non-accrual loans
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 1st Qtr. 2009 | 4th Qtr. 2008 | 3rd Qtr. 2008 | 2nd Qtr. 2008 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citicorp | $ | 5,314 | $ | 3,829 | $ | 3,193 | $ | 2,408 | $ | 2,438 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 22,932 | 22,282 | 19,104 | 11,135 | 9,188 | ||||||||||||
Total Non-accrual loans (NAL) | $ | 28,246 | $ | 26,111 | $ | 22,297 | $ | 13,543 | $ | 11,626 | |||||||
Corporate non-accrual loans(1) | |||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 3,499 | $ | 3,789 | $ | 2,660 | $ | 851 | $ | 544 | |||||||
EMEA | 7,690 | 6,479 | 6,330 | 1,406 | 1,557 | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 230 | 300 | 229 | 125 | 74 | ||||||||||||
Asia | 1,013 | 639 | 513 | 357 | 40 | ||||||||||||
$ | 12,432 | $ | 11,207 | $ | 9,732 | $ | 2,739 | $ | 2,215 | ||||||||
Citicorp | $ | 3,045 | $ | 1,825 | $ | 1,364 | $ | 605 | $ | 280 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | $ | 9,387 | $ | 9,382 | $ | 8,368 | $ | 2,134 | $ | 1,935 | |||||||
$ | 12,432 | $ | 11,207 | $ | 9,732 | $ | 2,739 | $ | 2,215 | ||||||||
Consumer non-accrual loans(1)(2) | |||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 12,154 | $ | 11,687 | $ | 9,617 | $ | 7,941 | $ | 6,400 | |||||||
EMEA | 1,356 | 1,128 | 948 | 904 | 856 | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 1,520 | 1,338 | 1,290 | 1,343 | 1,441 | ||||||||||||
Asia | 784 | 751 | 710 | 616 | 714 | ||||||||||||
$ | 15,814 | $ | 14,904 | $ | 12,565 | $ | 10,804 | $ | 9,411 | ||||||||
Citicorp | $ | 2,269 | $ | 2,004 | $ | 1,829 | $ | 1,803 | $ | 2,158 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 13,545 | 12,900 | 10,736 | 9,001 | 7,253 | ||||||||||||
$ | 15,814 | $ | 14,904 | $ | 12,565 | $ | 10,804 | $ | 9,411 | ||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citicorp | $ | 4,510 | $ | 5,024 | $ | 5,353 | $ | 5,507 | $ | 5,395 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 20,302 | 23,544 | 26,387 | 27,177 | 22,851 | ||||||||||||
Total non-accrual loans (NAL) | $ | 24,812 | $ | 28,568 | $ | 31,740 | $ | 32,684 | $ | 28,246 | |||||||
Corporate NAL(1) | |||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 4,411 | $ | 5,660 | $ | 5,621 | $ | 5,263 | $ | 3,499 | |||||||
EMEA | 5,508 | 5,834 | 6,308 | 7,969 | 7,690 | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 570 | 608 | 569 | 416 | 230 | ||||||||||||
Asia | 547 | 830 | 981 | 1,061 | 1,056 | ||||||||||||
$ | 11,036 | $ | 12,932 | $ | 13,479 | $ | 14,709 | $ | 12,475 | ||||||||
Citicorp | $ | 2,573 | $ | 2,975 | $ | 3,238 | $ | 3,300 | $ | 3,159 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 8,463 | 9,957 | 10,241 | 11,409 | 9,316 | ||||||||||||
$ | 11,036 | $ | 12,932 | $ | 13,479 | $ | 14,709 | $ | 12,475 | ||||||||
Consumer NAL(1) | |||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 11,289 | $ | 12,966 | $ | 15,111 | $ | 14,609 | $ | 12,154 | |||||||
EMEA | 690 | 790 | 1,159 | 1,314 | 1,356 | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 1,218 | 1,246 | 1,340 | 1,342 | 1,520 | ||||||||||||
Asia | 579 | 634 | 651 | 710 | 741 | ||||||||||||
$ | 13,776 | $ | 15,636 | $ | 18,261 | $ | 17,975 | $ | 15,771 | ||||||||
Citicorp | $ | 1,937 | $ | 2,049 | $ | 2,115 | $ | 2,207 | $ | 2,236 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 11,839 | 13,587 | 16,146 | 15,768 | 13,535 | ||||||||||||
$ | 13,776 | $ | 15,636 | $ | 18,261 | $ | 17,975 | $ | 15,771 | ||||||||
Table of the deterioration in the U.S. consumer real estate market.
Non-Accrual Assets (continued)
The table below summarizes the Company'sCitigroup's other real estate owned (OREO) assets. This represents the carrying value of all property acquired by foreclosure or other legal proceedings when the CompanyCiti has taken possession of the collateral.
OREO | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 1st Qtr. 2009 | 4th Qtr. 2008 | 3rd Qtr. 2008 | 2nd Qtr. 2008 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citicorp | $ | 291 | $ | 307 | $ | 371 | $ | 425 | $ | 512 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 664 | 854 | 1,022 | 1,092 | 1,010 | ||||||||||||
Corporate/Other | 14 | 41 | 40 | 85 | 88 | ||||||||||||
Total OREO | $ | 969 | $ | 1,202 | $ | 1,433 | $ | 1,602 | $ | 1,610 | |||||||
North America | $ | 789 | $ | 1,115 | $ | 1,349 | $ | 1,525 | $ | 1,528 | |||||||
EMEA | 97 | 65 | 66 | 61 | 63 | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 29 | 20 | 16 | 14 | 17 | ||||||||||||
Asia | 54 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||||||||||
$ | 969 | $ | 1,202 | $ | 1,433 | $ | 1,602 | $ | 1,610 | ||||||||
Other repossessed assets(1) | $ | 72 | $ | 78 | $ | 78 | $ | 81 | $ | 94 | |||||||
OREO | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citicorp | $ | 870 | $ | 881 | $ | 874 | $ | 284 | $ | 291 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 790 | 632 | 615 | 585 | 664 | ||||||||||||
Corporate/Other | 13 | 8 | 11 | 15 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Total OREO | $ | 1,673 | $ | 1,521 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 884 | $ | 969 | |||||||
North America | $ | 1,428 | $ | 1,291 | $ | 1,294 | $ | 682 | $ | 789 | |||||||
EMEA | 146 | 134 | 121 | 105 | 97 | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 43 | 51 | 45 | 40 | 29 | ||||||||||||
Asia | 56 | 45 | 40 | 57 | 54 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,673 | $ | 1,521 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 884 | $ | 969 | ||||||||
Other repossessed assets(1) | $ | 55 | $ | 64 | $ | 73 | $ | 76 | $ | 72 | |||||||
Non-accrual assets (NAA)—Total Citigroup | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corporate NAL | $ | 11,036 | $ | 12,932 | $ | 13,479 | $ | 14,709 | $ | 12,475 | |||||||
Consumer NAL | 13,776 | 15,636 | 18,261 | 17,975 | 15,771 | ||||||||||||
NAL | $ | 24,812 | $ | 28,568 | $ | 31,740 | $ | 32,684 | $ | 28,246 | |||||||
OREO | $ | 1,673 | $ | 1,521 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 884 | $ | 969 | |||||||
Other repossessed assets | 55 | 64 | 73 | 76 | 72 | ||||||||||||
NAA | $ | 26,540 | $ | 30,153 | $ | 33,313 | $ | 33,644 | $ | 29,287 | |||||||
NAL as a percentage of total loans | 3.58 | % | 3.96 | % | 5.37 | % | 5.25 | % | 4.40 | % | |||||||
NAA as a percentage of total assets | 1.37 | % | 1.51 | % | 1.79 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.58 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1) | 186 | % | 171 | % | 114 | % | 111 | % | 127 | % | |||||||
There is no industry-wide definition of non-performing assets. As such, analysis against the industry is not always comparable. The table below represents the Company's view of non-performing assets. As a general rule, unsecured consumer loans are charged off at 120 days past due and credit card loans are charged off at 180 days contractually past due. Consumer loans secured with non-real-estate collateral are written down to the estimated value of the collateral, less costs to sell, at 120 days past due. Consumer real-estate secured loans are written down to the estimated value of the property, less costs to sell, when they are 180 days contractually past due. Impaired corporate loans and leases are written down to the extent that principal is judged to be uncollectible.
Non-performing assets—Total Citigroup | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 1st Qtr. 2009 | 4th Qtr. 2008 | 3rd Qtr. 2008 | 2nd Qtr. 2008 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corporate non-accrual loans | $ | 12,432 | $ | 11,207 | $ | 9,732 | $ | 2,739 | $ | 2,215 | |||||||
Consumer non-accrual loans | 15,814 | 14,904 | 12,565 | 10,804 | 9,411 | ||||||||||||
Non-accrual loans (NAL) | $ | 28,246 | $ | 26,111 | $ | 22,297 | $ | 13,543 | $ | 11,626 | |||||||
OREO | $ | 969 | $ | 1,202 | $ | 1,433 | $ | 1,602 | $ | 1,610 | |||||||
Other repossessed assets | 72 | 78 | 78 | 81 | 94 | ||||||||||||
Non-performing assets (NPA) | $ | 29,287 | $ | 27,391 | $ | 23,808 | $ | 15,226 | $ | 13,330 | |||||||
NAL as a % of total loans | 4.40 | % | 3.97 | % | 3.21 | % | 1.89 | % | 1.56 | % | |||||||
NPA as a % of total assets | 1.59 | % | 1.50 | % | 1.23 | % | 0.74 | % | 0.63 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL(1) | 127 | % | 121 | % | 133 | % | 177 | % | 179 | % | |||||||
NAA—Total Citicorp | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAL | $ | 4,510 | $ | 5,024 | $ | 5,353 | $ | 5,507 | $ | 5,395 | |||||||
OREO | 870 | 881 | 874 | 284 | 291 | ||||||||||||
Other repossessed assets | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
Non-accrual assets (NAA) | $ | 5,380 | $ | 5,905 | $ | 6,227 | $ | 5,791 | $ | 5,686 | |||||||
NAA as a percentage of total assets | 0.44 | % | 0.48 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.54 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1) | 389 | % | 368 | % | 200 | % | 199 | % | 198 | % | |||||||
NAA—Total Citi Holdings | |||||||||||||||||
NAL | $ | 20,302 | $ | 23,544 | $ | 26,387 | $ | 27,177 | $ | 22,851 | |||||||
OREO | 790 | 632 | 615 | 585 | 664 | ||||||||||||
Other repossessed assets | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
NAA | $ | 21,092 | $ | 24,176 | $ | 27,002 | $ | 27,762 | $ | 23,515 | |||||||
NAA as a percentage of total assets | 4.54 | % | 4.81 | % | 5.54 | % | 4.99 | % | 4.04 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1) | 141 | % | 128 | % | 96 | % | 94 | % | 111 | % | |||||||
Non-performing assets—Total Citicorp | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 1st Qtr. 2009 | 4th Qtr. 2008 | 3rd Qtr. 2008 | 2nd Qtr. 2008 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-accrual loans (NAL) | $ | 5,314 | $ | 3,829 | $ | 3,193 | $ | 2,408 | $ | 2,438 | |||||||
OREO | $ | 291 | $ | 307 | $ | 371 | $ | 425 | $ | 512 | |||||||
Other repossessed assets | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
Non-performing assets (NPA) | $ | 5,605 | $ | 4,136 | $ | 3,564 | $ | 2,833 | $ | 2,950 | |||||||
NPA as a % of total assets | 0.57 | % | 0.43 | % | 0.36 | % | 0.24 | % | 0.25 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL | 189 | % | 223 | % | 241 | % | 276 | % | 252 | % | |||||||
Non-performing assets—Total Citi Holdings | |||||||||||||||||
Non-accrual loans (NAL) | $ | 22,932 | $ | 22,282 | $ | 19,104 | $ | 11,135 | $ | 9,188 | |||||||
OREO | $ | 664 | 854 | 1,022 | 1,092 | 1,010 | |||||||||||
Other repossessed assets | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
Non-performing assets (NPA) | $ | 23,596 | $ | 23,136 | $ | 20,126 | $ | 12,227 | $ | 10,198 | |||||||
NPA as a % of total assets | 3.64 | % | 3.49 | % | 2.81 | % | 1.58 | % | 1.22 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL | 113 | % | 104 | % | 115 | % | 156 | % | 159 | % | |||||||
N/A Not available at the Citicorp or Citi Holdings level.
U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposure in Citi Holdings—Special Asset PoolRenegotiated Loans
The following table summarizes Citigroup's U.S. subprime-related direct exposurespresents loans which were modified in Citi Holdingsa troubled debt restructuring.
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corporate renegotiated loans(1) | ||||||||
In U.S. offices | ||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 254 | $ | 203 | ||||
Mortgage and real estate | 169 | — | ||||||
Other | 143 | — | ||||||
$ | 566 | $ | 203 | |||||
In offices outside the U.S. | ||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 192 | $ | 145 | ||||
Mortgage and real estate | 7 | 2 | ||||||
Other | — | — | ||||||
$ | 199 | $ | 147 | |||||
Total corporate renegotiated loans | $ | 765 | $ | 350 | ||||
Consumer renegotiated loans(2)(3)(4)(5) | ||||||||
In U.S. offices | ||||||||
Mortgage and real estate | $ | 16,582 | $ | 11,165 | ||||
Cards | 4,044 | 992 | ||||||
Installment and other | 2,180 | 2,689 | ||||||
$ | 22,806 | $ | 14,846 | |||||
In offices outside the U.S. | ||||||||
Mortgage and real estate | $ | 734 | $ | 415 | ||||
Cards | 985 | 1,461 | ||||||
Installment and other | 2,189 | 1,401 | ||||||
3,908 | 3,277 | |||||||
Total consumer renegotiated loans | $ | 26,714 | $ | 18,123 | ||||
In billions of dollars | March 31, 2009 exposures | Second Quarter 2009 write-ups (downs)(1) | Second Quarter 2009 Other(2) | June 30, 2009 exposures | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Direct ABS CDO super senior exposures: | ||||||||||||||
Gross ABS CDO super senior exposures (A) | $ | 15.2 | $ | 14.5 | ||||||||||
Hedged exposures (B) | 6.6 | 6.3 | ||||||||||||
Net ABS CDO super senior exposures: | ||||||||||||||
ABCP/CDO(3) | 7.6 | $ | 0.6 | $ | (0.9 | ) | 7.3 | |||||||
High grade | 0.6 | 0.1 | (0.1 | ) | 0.7 | |||||||||
Mezzanine | 0.3 | (0.1 | )(4) | 0.0 | 0.2 | |||||||||
Total net ABS CDO super senior exposures (A-B=C) | $ | 8.5 | $ | 0.6 | $ | (0.9 | )(5) | $ | 8.3 | |||||
Lending and structuring exposures: | ||||||||||||||
CDO warehousing/unsold tranches of ABS CDOs | $ | 0.0 | $ | (0.0 | ) | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.0 | |||||
Subprime loans purchased for sale or securitization | 1.1 | (0.0 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 1.0 | ||||||||
Financing transactions secured by subprime | 0.5 | (0.0 | )(4) | (0.2 | ) | 0.4 | ||||||||
Total lending and structuring exposures (D) | $ | 1.7 | $ | (0.0 | ) | $ | (0.3 | ) | $ | 1.4 | ||||
Total net exposures (C+D)(6) | $ | 10.2 | $ | 0.6 | $ | (1.2 | ) | $ | 9.6 | |||||
Credit adjustment on hedged counterparty exposures (E)(7) | $ | 0.2 | ||||||||||||
Total net write-ups (downs) (C+D+E) | $ | 0.8 | ||||||||||||
Note: Table may not foot or cross-foot due to roundings.
A portionRepresentations and Warranties
When selling a loan, Citi makes various representations and warranties relating to, among other things, the following:
The specific representations and warranties made by Citi depend on the nature of the transaction and the requirements of the buyer. Market conditions and credit-rating agency requirements may also affect representations and warranties and the other provisions Citi may agree to in loan sales.
Citi's representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits in amount or time of coverage. However, contractual liability arises only when the representations and warranties are breached and generally only when a loss results from the breach. In the event of a breach of these representations and warranties, Citi may be required to either repurchase the mortgage loans (generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest), with the identified defects, or indemnify ("make whole") the investors for their losses.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, almost half of Citi's repurchases and make-whole payments were attributable to misrepresentation of facts by either the borrower or a third party (e.g., income, employment, debts, FICO, etc.), up from approximately a quarter for the respective periods in 2009. In addition, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, approximately 20% of Citi's repurchases and make-whole payments related to appraisal issues (e.g., an error or misrepresentation of value), up from approximately 9% for the respective 2009 periods. The third largest category of repurchases and make-whole payments in 2010, to date, related to program requirements (e.g., a loan that does not meet investor guidelines such as contractual interest rate), which was purchasedthe second largest category in liquidationsthe first half of CDOs2009. There is not a meaningful difference in incurred or estimated loss for each type of defect.
In the case of a repurchase, Citi will bear any subsequent credit loss on the mortgage loan and reported asthe loan is typically considered a credit-impaired loan and accounted for under SOP 03-3, "Accounting for Certain Loans and Debt Securities, Acquired in a Transfer" (now incorporated into ASC 310-30,Trading account assetsReceivables—Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality). To date, these repurchases have not had a material impact on Citi's non-performing loan statistics because credit-impaired purchased SOP 03-3 loans are not included in non-accrual loans.
As evidenced by the tables below, to date, Citigroup's repurchases have primarily been from the government sponsored entities (GSEs).
The unpaid principal balance of repurchased loans for representation and warranty claims for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 $156was as follows:
| Three months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||
In millions of dollars | Unpaid Principal Balance | Unpaid Principal Balance | |||||
GSEs | $ | 63 | $ | 83 | |||
Private investors | 8 | 4 | |||||
Total | $ | 71 | $ | 87 | |||
The unpaid principal balance of repurchased loans for representation and warranty claims for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||
In millions of dollars | Unpaid Principal Balance | Unpaid Principal Balance | |||||
GSEs | $ | 150 | $ | 156 | |||
Private investors | 12 | 10 | |||||
Total | $ | 162 | $ | 166 | |||
In addition, Citi recorded make-whole payments of $43 million and $17 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, and $66 million and $24 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
Citi has recorded a reserve for its exposure to losses from the obligation to repurchase previously sold loans (repurchase reserve) that is included inOther liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The repurchase reserve is net of reimbursements estimated to be received by Citi for indemnification agreements relating to deals liquidated was heldprevious acquisitions of mortgage servicing rights. In the case of a repurchase of a credit-impaired SOP 03-3 loan, the difference between the loan's fair value and unpaid principal balance at the time of the repurchase is recorded as a utilization of the repurchase reserve. Make-whole payments to the investor are also treated as utilizations and charged directly against the reserve. The repurchase reserve is estimated when Citi sells loans (recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale, which is included inOther revenue in the trading books.
The Company had approximately $9.6 billionis updated quarterly. Any change in net U.S. subprime-related direct exposuresestimate is recorded inOther revenue in the Special Asset Pool at June 30, 2009. The exposure consistedConsolidated Statement of (a) approximately $8.3 billion of net exposures in the super senior tranches (i.e., the most senior tranches) of CDOs, which are collateralized by asset-backed securities, derivatives on asset-backed securities, or both (ABS CDOs), and (b) approximately $1.4 billion of exposures in its lending and structuring business.
Direct ABS CDO Super Senior ExposuresIncome.
The net $8.3 billionrepurchase reserve is calculated separately by sales vintage (i.e., the year the loans were sold) based on various assumptions. While substantially all of Citi's current loan sales are with GSEs, with which Citi has considerable historical experience, these assumptions contain a level of uncertainty and risk that, if different from actual results, could have a material impact on the reserve amounts. The most significant assumptions used to calculate the reserve levels are as follows:
In Citi's experience to date, as stated above, the request for loan documentation packages is an early indicator of a potential claim. During 2009, loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims increased. In addition, Citi's loss severity estimates increased during 2009 due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and its experience with actual losses at such time. As set forth in the tables below, these factors contributed to changes in estimates for the repurchase reserve amounting to $103 million and $247 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, is collateralized primarily by subprime residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS), derivatives on RMBS, or both. These exposures include $7.3 billionrespectively.
During the second quarter of 2010, loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims further increased. In addition, there was an overall deterioration in the super senior tranches of ABS CDOs initially issued as commercial paper (ABCP) and approximately $0.9 billion of other super senior tranches of ABS CDOs.
Citigroup's CDO super senior subprime direct exposures are Level 3 assets. The valuation ofkey assumptions due to the high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO positions uses trader prices based on the underlying assets of each high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO. Unlike the ABCP- and CDO-squared positions, the high-grade and mezzanine positions are now largely hedged through the ABX and bond short positions, which are, by necessity, trader priced. This results in closer symmetry in the way these long and short positions are valued by the Company. Citigroup intends to use trader marks to value this portion of the portfolio going forward so long as it remains largely hedged.
The valuation of the ABCP- and CDO-squared positions are subject to valuation based on significant unobservable inputs. Fair value of these exposures is based on estimates of future cash flows from the mortgage loans underlying the assets of the ABS CDOs. To determine the performance of the underlying mortgage loan portfolios, the Company estimates the prepayments, defaults and loss severities based on a numberimpact of macroeconomic factors including housing price changes, unemployment rates, interest rates, and borrower and loan attributes, such as age, credit scores, documentation status, loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and debt-to-income (DTI) ratios. The model is calibrated using available mortgage loan information including historical loan performance. In addition,Citi's continued experience with actual losses. These factors contributed to the methodology estimates$347 million change in estimate for the impact of geographic concentration of mortgages and the impact of reported fraudrepurchase reserve in the originationquarter.
As indicated above, the repurchase reserve is calculated by sales vintage. The majority of subprime mortgages.the repurchases in 2010 were from the 2006 through 2008 sales vintages and, in 2009, were from the 2006 and 2007 vintages, which also represent the vintages with the largest loss-given-repurchase. An appropriate discount rate is then appliedinsignificant percentage of 2010 and 2009 repurchases were from vintages prior to 2006, and Citi currently anticipates that this percentage will decrease, as those vintages are later in the cash flows generated for each ABCP-credit cycle. Although early in the credit cycle, to date, Citi has experienced improved repurchase and CDO-squared tranche, in order to estimate its fair value under current market conditions.
When necessary,loss-given-repurchase statistics from the valuation methodology used by Citigroup is refined2009 and the inputs used for purposes of estimation are modified, in part, to reflect ongoing market developments. More specifically, the inputs of home price appreciation (HPA) assumptions and delinquency data were updated along with discount rates that are based upon a weighted average combination of implied spreads from single-name ABS bond prices and ABX indices, as well as CLO spreads under current market conditions. The housing-price changes are estimated using a forward-looking projection, which incorporated the Loan Performance Index. In addition,2010 vintages.
The activity in the Company's mortgage default model also usesrepurchase reserve for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:
| Three months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 450 | $ | 218 | |||
Additions for new sales | 4 | 13 | |||||
Change in estimate | 347 | 103 | |||||
Utilizations | (74 | ) | (55 | ) | |||
Balance, end of period | $ | 727 | $ | 279 | |||
The activity in the repurchase reserve for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 482 | $ | 75 | |||
Additions for new sales | 9 | 19 | |||||
Change in estimate | 347 | 247 | |||||
Utilizations | (111 | ) | (62 | ) | |||
Balance, end of period | $ | 727 | $ | 279 | |||
Citi does not believe a meaningful range of reasonably possible loss related to its repurchase reserve can be determined.
Projected future repurchases are calculated, in part, based on the level of unresolved claims at quarter-end as well as trends in claims being made by investors. For GSEs, the response to the repurchase claim is required within 90 days of the claim receipt. If Citi did not respond within 90 days, the claim would then be discussed between Citi and the GSE. For private investors, the time period for responding is governed by the individual sale agreement. If the specified timeframe is exceeded, the investor may choose to initiate legal action.
As would be expected, as the trend in claims and inventory increases, Citi's reserve for repurchases typically increases. Included in Citi's current reserve estimate is an assumption that repurchase claims will remain at elevated levels for the foreseeable future, although the actual number of claims may differ and is subject to uncertainty. Furthermore, approximately half of the repurchase claims in Citi's recent mortgage performance data, a period of sharp home price declinesexperience have been successfully appealed and high levels of mortgage foreclosures.resulted in no loss to Citi.
The valuationnumber of unresolved claims by type of claimant as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, assumeswas as follows:
Number of claims | June 30 2010 | December 31 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEs | 4,166 | 2,575 | |||||
Private investors | 214 | 309 | |||||
Mortgage insurers(1) | 98 | 204 | |||||
Total | 4,478 | 3,088 | |||||
Table of 32.3%. This rate assumes declinesContents
Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts and Ratios
| Total loans(6) | 90+ days past due(1) | 30-89 days past due(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except EOP loan amounts in billions | Jun. 2010 | Jun. 2010 | Mar. 2010 | Jun. 2009 | Jun. 2010 | Mar. 2010 | Jun. 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Citicorp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 218.5 | $ | 3,733 | $ | 3,937 | $ | 4,289 | $ | 3,858 | $ | 4,294 | $ | 4,328 | ||||||||||
Ratio | 1.71 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.97 | % | 1.77 | % | 1.94 | % | 1.99 | % | ||||||||||||
Retail Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 109.1 | 804 | 782 | 767 | 1,131 | 1,200 | 1,084 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 0.74 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.74 | % | 1.04 | % | 1.08 | % | 1.05 | % | ||||||||||||
North America | 30.2 | 245 | 142 | 97 | 241 | 236 | 87 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 0.81 | % | 0.45 | % | 0.29 | % | 0.80 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||||
EMEA | 4.3 | 50 | 52 | 70 | 145 | 182 | 235 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 1.16 | % | 1.06 | % | 1.23 | % | 3.37 | % | 3.71 | % | 4.12 | % | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 19.6 | 308 | 352 | 316 | 305 | 346 | 337 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 1.57 | % | 1.81 | % | 1.92 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.78 | % | 2.04 | % | ||||||||||||
Asia | 55.0 | 201 | 236 | 284 | 440 | 436 | 425 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 0.37 | % | 0.43 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.80 | % | 0.80 | % | 0.90 | % | ||||||||||||
Citi-Branded Cards(2)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 109.4 | 2,929 | 3,155 | 3,522 | 2,727 | 3,094 | 3,244 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 2.68 | % | 2.86 | % | 3.07 | % | 2.49 | % | 2.81 | % | 2.83 | % | ||||||||||||
North America | 77.2 | 2,130 | 2,304 | 2,366 | 1,828 | 2,145 | 2,024 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 2.76 | % | 2.97 | % | 2.84 | % | 2.37 | % | 2.76 | % | 2.43 | % | ||||||||||||
EMEA | 2.6 | 72 | 77 | 99 | 90 | 113 | 146 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 2.77 | % | 2.66 | % | 3.54 | % | 3.46 | % | 3.90 | % | 5.21 | % | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 12.0 | 481 | 510 | 707 | 485 | 475 | 693 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 4.01 | % | 4.21 | % | 5.84 | % | 4.04 | % | 3.93 | % | 5.73 | % | ||||||||||||
Asia | 17.6 | 246 | 264 | 350 | 324 | 361 | 381 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 1.40 | % | 1.51 | % | 2.12 | % | 1.84 | % | 2.06 | % | 2.31 | % | ||||||||||||
Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 286.3 | 14,371 | 16,808 | 15,869 | 11,201 | 12,236 | 14,371 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 5.24 | % | 5.66 | % | 4.80 | % | 4.08 | % | 4.12 | % | 4.35 | % | ||||||||||||
International | 24.6 | 724 | 953 | 1,551 | 939 | 1,059 | 1,845 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 2.94 | % | 3.44 | % | 3.93 | % | 3.82 | % | 3.82 | % | 4.67 | % | ||||||||||||
North America retail partner cards(2)(3) | 50.2 | 2,004 | 2,385 | 2,590 | 2,150 | 2,374 | 2,749 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 3.99 | % | 4.38 | % | 4.09 | % | 4.28 | % | 4.36 | % | 4.34 | % | ||||||||||||
North America (excluding cards)(4)(5) | 211.5 | 11,643 | 13,470 | 11,728 | 8,112 | 8,803 | 9,777 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 5.84 | % | 6.27 | % | 5.16 | % | 4.07 | % | 4.10 | % | 4.30 | % | ||||||||||||
Total Citigroup (excludingSpecial Asset Pool) | $ | 504.8 | $ | 18,104 | $ | 20,745 | $ | 20,158 | $ | 15,059 | $ | 16,530 | $ | 18,699 | ||||||||||
Ratio | 3.67 | % | 4.01 | % | 3.68 | % | 3.06 | % | 3.19 | % | 3.41 | % | ||||||||||||
In addition, the discount rates were30 to 89 days past due are calculated based on end-of-period loans.
U.S. agencies. The primary drivers that currently impact the model valuations are the discount rates used to calculate the present value of projected cash flowsamounts excluded for loans 90 days or more past due and projected mortgage loan performance. In valuing its direct ABCP-(end-of-period loans) for each period are: $5.0 billion ($9.4 billion), $5.2 billion ($9.0 billion), and CDO-squared super senior exposures, the Company has made its best estimate of the key inputs that should be used in its valuation methodology. However, the size and nature of these positions as well as current market conditions are such that changes in inputs such as the discount rates used to calculate the present value of the cash flows can have a significant impact on the reported value of these exposures. For instance, each 10 basis point change in the discount rate used generally results in an approximate $24 million change in the fair value of the Company's direct ABCP- and CDO-squared super senior exposures$4.3 billion ($8.7 billion) as of June 30, 2009. This applies to both decreases in the discount rate (which would increase the value of these assets and decrease reported write-downs) and increases in the discount rate (which would decrease the value of these assets and increase reported write-downs).
Estimates of the fair value of the CDO super senior exposures depend on market conditions and are subject to further change over time. In addition, while Citigroup believes that the methodology used to value these exposures is reasonable, the methodology is subject to continuing refinement, including as a result of market developments. Further, any observable transactions in respect of some or all of these exposures could be employed in the fair valuation process in accordance with and in the manner called for by SFAS 157 (ASC 820-10).
Lending and Structuring Exposures
The $1.4 billion of subprime-related exposures includes approximately $1.0 billion of actively managed subprime loans purchased for resale or securitization at a discount to par during 2007 and approximately $0.4 billion of financing transactions with customers secured by subprime collateral. These amounts represent the fair value as determined using observable inputs and other market data. The majority of the change from the2010, March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, balances reflects sales, transfersrespectively. The amounts excluded for loans 30 to 89 days past due (end-of-period loans have the same adjustment as above) for each period are: $1.6 billion, $1.2 billion, and liquidations.
$0.7 billion, as of June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
Exposure to Commercial Real Estate
The Company, through its business activities and as a capital markets participant, incurs exposures that are directly or indirectly tied to the commercial real estate market. These exposures are represented primarily by the following three categories:
(1) Assets held at fair value include: $5.1 billion, of which approximately $4.3 billion are securities, loans and other items linked to commercial real estate (CRE) that are carried at fair valuevalue.
Consumer Loan Net Credit Losses and Ratios
| Average loans(1) | Net credit losses(2) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except average loan amounts in billions | 2Q10 | 2Q10 | 1Q10 | 2Q09 | |||||||||||
Citicorp | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 217.8 | $ | 2,922 | $ | 3,040 | $ | 1,406 | |||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,837 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | $ | 2,922 | $ | 3,040 | $ | 3,243 | |||||||||
Ratio | 5.38 | % | 5.57 | % | 6.01 | % | |||||||||
Retail Bank | |||||||||||||||
Total | 109.3 | 304 | 289 | 428 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 1.12 | % | 1.07 | % | 1.66 | % | |||||||||
North America | 30.7 | 79 | 73 | 88 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 1.03 | % | 0.92 | % | 1.01 | % | |||||||||
EMEA | 4.5 | 46 | 47 | 74 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 4.10 | % | 3.81 | % | 5.30 | % | |||||||||
Latin America | 19.4 | 96 | 91 | 138 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 1.98 | % | 1.99 | % | 3.40 | % | |||||||||
Asia | 54.7 | 83 | 78 | 128 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 0.61 | % | 0.59 | % | 1.10 | % | |||||||||
Citi-Branded Cards | |||||||||||||||
Total | 108.5 | 2,618 | 2,751 | 978 | |||||||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,837 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 2,618 | 2,751 | 2,815 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 9.68 | % | 9.96 | % | 10.02 | % | |||||||||
North America | 76.2 | 2,047 | 2,084 | 219 | |||||||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,837 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 2,047 | 2,084 | 2,056 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 10.77 | % | 10.67 | % | 10.08 | % | |||||||||
EMEA | 2.7 | 39 | 50 | 47 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 5.79 | % | 6.99 | % | 6.73 | % | |||||||||
Latin America | 12.0 | 361 | 418 | 472 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 12.07 | % | 14.01 | % | 15.91 | % | |||||||||
Asia | 17.6 | 171 | 199 | 240 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 3.90 | % | 4.53 | % | 5.94 | % | |||||||||
Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending | |||||||||||||||
Total | 301.7 | 4,535 | 4,938 | 5,144 | |||||||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,278 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 4,535 | 4,938 | 6,422 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 6.03 | % | 6.30 | % | 7.48 | % | |||||||||
International | 26.1 | 495 | 612 | 962 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 7.61 | % | 8.27 | % | 9.72 | % | |||||||||
North America retail partner cards | 53.1 | 1,775 | 1,932 | 872 | |||||||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,278 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 1,775 | 1,932 | 2,150 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 13.41 | % | 13.72 | % | 13.58 | % | |||||||||
North America (excluding cards) | 222.5 | 2,265 | 2,394 | 3,310 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 4.08 | % | 4.20 | % | 5.50 | % | |||||||||
Total Citigroup (excludingSpecial Asset Pool) | $ | 519.5 | $ | 7,457 | $ | 7,978 | $ | 6,550 | |||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 3,115 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 7,457 | 7,978 | 9,665 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 5.76 | % | 6.00 | % | 6.92 | % | |||||||||
Consumer Loan Modification Programs
Citigroup has instituted a variety of modification programs to assist borrowers with financial difficulties. These programs, as trading account assets, $0.1described below, include modifying the original loan terms, reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. At June 30, 2010, Citi's significant modification programs consisted of the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), as well as short-term and long-term modification programs, each as summarized below.
HAMP. The HAMP is designed to reduce monthly first mortgage payments to a 31% housing debt ratio (monthly mortgage payment, including property taxes, insurance and homeowner dues, divided by monthly gross income) by lowering the interest rate, extending the term of the loan and deferring or forgiving principal of certain eligible borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgages or who are at risk of imminent default due to economic hardship. The interest rate reduction for first mortgages under HAMP is in effect for five years and the rate then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate cap (the lower of the original rate or the Freddie Mac Weekly Primary Mortgage Market Survey rate for a 30-year fixed rate conforming loan as of the date of the modification) is reached.
In order to be entitled to loan modifications, borrowers must complete a three- to- five-month trial period, make the agreed payments and provide the required documentation. Beginning March 1, 2010, documentation is required to be provided prior to beginning the trial period, whereas prior to that date, it was required to be provided before the end of the trial period. This change generally means that Citi is able to verify income up front for potential HAMP participants before they begin making lower monthly payments. Citi currently believes this change will limit the number of borrowers who ultimately fall out of the trials and potentially mitigates the impact of HAMP trial participants on early bucket delinquency data.
During the trial period, Citi requires that the original terms of the loans remain in effect pending completion of the modification. From inception through June 30, 2010, approximately $8.5 billion of loansfirst mortgages were enrolled in the HAMP trial period, while $2.5 billion have successfully completed the trial period. Upon completion of the trial period, the terms of the loan are contractually modified, and it is accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring (see "Long-term programs" below).
Citi also recently agreed to participate in the U.S. Treasury's HAMP second mortgage program, which requires Citi to either: (1) modify the borrower's second mortgage according to a defined protocol; or (2) accept a lump sum payment from the U.S. Treasury in exchange for full extinguishment of the second mortgage. For a borrower to qualify, the borrower must have successfully modified his/her first mortgage under the HAMP and met other criteria.
Loans included in the HAMP trial period are held-for-sale,not classified as modified under short-term or long-term programs, and approximately $0.7 billion which are securities backed by CRE carried at fair value as available-for-sale (AFS) investments. Changes in fair valuethe allowance for loan losses for these trading account assets are reported in current earnings, while AFS investments are reported in OCI with other-than-temporary impairments reported in current earnings.
The majority of these exposures are classified as Level 3 in the fair-value hierarchy. Weakening activity in the trading marketsloans is calculated under ASC 450-20. See "Loan Accounting Policies" above for some of these instruments resulted in reduced liquidity, thereby decreasing the observable inputs for such valuations, and could have an adverse impact on how these instruments are valued in the future if such conditions persist.
(2) Assets held at amortized cost include approximately $2.0 billion of securities classified as held-to-maturity (HTM) and $24.0 billion of loans and commitments. The HTM securities were classified as such during the fourth quarter of 2008 and were previously classified as either trading or AFS. They are accounted for at amortized cost, subject to other-than-temporary impairment. Loans and commitments are recorded at amortized cost, less loan loss reserves. The impact from changes in credit is reflected in the calculationa further discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.
As of June 30, 2010, of the loans in which the trial period has ended, 37% of the loan balances were successfully modified under HAMP, 12% were modified under the Citi Supplemental program, 6% received HAMP Re-age, (as described under Consumer Loan Modification Programs) and 45% did not receive any modification from Citi to date.
Long-term programs. Long-term modification programs or troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) occur when the terms of a loan have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and a long-term concession has been granted to the borrower. Substantially all long-term programs in net credit losses.place provide interest rate reductions. See "Loan Accounting Policies" above for a discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.
The following table presents Citigroup's consumer loan TDRs as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. As discussed above under "HAMP", HAMP loans whose terms are contractually modified after successful completion of the trial period are included in the balances below:
| Accrual | Non-accrual | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Jun. 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | Jun. 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | |||||||||
Mortgage and real estate | $ | 14,135 | $ | 8,654 | $ | 1,776 | $ | 1,413 | |||||
Cards(1) | 4,995 | 2,303 | 34 | 150 | |||||||||
Installment and other | 3,431 | 3,128 | 333 | 250 | |||||||||
The predominant amount of these TDRs are concentrated in the U.S. Citi's significant long-term U.S. modification programs include:
(3) Equity and other investments Citi Supplemental. include approximately $4.5 billionThe Citi Supplemental (CSM) program was designed by Citi to assist borrowers ineligible for HAMP or who become ineligible through the HAMP trial period process. If the borrower already has less than a 31% housing debt ratio, the modification offered is an interest rate reduction (up to 2.5% with a floor rate of equity4%) which is in effect for two years, and other investments suchthe rate then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate is at the pre-modified contractual rate. If the borrower's housing debt ratio is greater than 31%, specific treatment steps for HAMP, including an interest rate reduction, will be followed to achieve a 31% housing debt ratio. The modified interest rate is in effect for two years and then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate is at the pre-modified contractual rate. If income documentation was not supplied previously for HAMP, it is required for CSM. Three or more trial payments are required prior to modification. These payments can be made during the HAMP and/or CSM trial period.
HAMP Re-Age. As previously disclosed, loans in the HAMP trial period are aged according to their original contractual terms, rather than the modified HAMP terms. This results in the receivable being reported as limited partner fund investments which are accounted fordelinquent even if the reduced payments agreed to under the equity method,program are made by the borrower. Upon conclusion of the trial period, loans that do not qualify for a long-term modification are returned to the delinquency status in which recognizes gains or losses they began their trial period. However, that delinquency status would be further deteriorated for each trial payment not made (HAMP Re-age). HAMP Re-age establishes a non-interest-bearing deferral
based on the investor's sharedifference between the original contractual amounts due and the HAMP trial payments made. Citigroup considers this re-age and deferral process to constitute a concession to a borrower in financial difficulty and therefore records the loans as TDRs upon re-age.
2nd FDIC. The 2nd FDIC modification program guidelines were created by the FDIC for delinquent or current borrowers where default is reasonably foreseeable. The program is designed for second mortgages and uses various concessions, including interest rate reductions, non-interest-bearing principal deferral, principal forgiveness, extending maturity dates, and forgiving accrued interest and late fees. These potential concessions are applied in a series of steps (similar to HAMP) that provides an affordable payment to the borrower (generally a combined housing payment ratio of 42%). The first step generally reduces the borrower's interest rate to 2% for fixed-rate home equity loans and 0.5% for home equity lines of credit. The interest rate reduction is in effect for the remaining term of the net incomeloan.
FHA/VA. Loans guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) are modified through the normal modification process required by those respective agencies. Borrowers must be delinquent and concessions include interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness, extending maturity dates, and forgiving accrued interest and late fees. The interest rate reduction is in effect for the remaining loan term. Losses on FHA loans are borne by the sponsoring agency provided that the insurance has not been breached as a result of an origination defect. The VA establishes a loan-level loss cap, beyond which Citi is liable for loss. Historically, Citi's losses on FHA and VA loans have been negligible.
CFNA Adjustment of Terms (AOT). This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a permanent hardship. Payment reduction is provided through the re-amortization of the investee.remaining loan balance, typically at a lower interest rate Modified loan tenors may not exceed a period of 480 months. Generally, the rescheduled payment cannot be less than 50% of the original payment amount unless the AOT is a result of participation in the CitiFinancial Home Affordability Modification Program (CHAMP) or military service member's Credit Relief Act Program (SCRA), or as a result of settlement, court order, judgment, or bankruptcy. Customers must make a qualifying payment at the reduced payment amount in order to qualify for the modification. In addition, customers must provide income verification (pay stubs and/or tax returns) and monthly obligations are validated through an updated credit report.
Other. Prior to the implementation of the HAMP, CSM and 2nd FDIC programs, Citigroup's U.S. mortgage business offered certain borrowers various tailored modifications, which included reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. Citigroup currently believes that substantially all of its future long-term U.S. mortgage modifications, at least in the near term, will be included in the programs mentioned above.
Paydown. The Paydown program is designed to liquidate a customer's balance within 60 months. It is available to customers who indicate long-term hardship (e.g., long-term disability, death of a co-borrower, medical issues or a non-temporary income reduction, such as an occupation change). Payment requirements are decreased by reducing interest rates charged to either 9.9% or 0%, depending upon the customer situation, and designed to amortize at least 1% of the balance each month. Under this program, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.
CCG. The CCG program handles proposals received via external consumer credit counselors on the customer's behalf. In order to qualify, customers work with a credit counseling agency to develop a plan to handle their overall budget, including money owed to Citi. A copy of the counseling agency's proposal letter is required. The annual percentage rate (APR) is reduced to 9.9%. The account fully amortizes in 60 months. Under this program, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.
Interest Reversal Paydown. The Interest Reversal Paydown program is also designed to liquidate a customer's balance within 60 months. It is available to customers who indicate a long-term hardship.Accumulated interest and fees owed to Citi are reversed upon enrollment, and future interest and fees are discontinued. Payment requirements are reduced and are designed to amortize at least 1% of the balance each month. Under this program, like the programs discussed above, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.
Auto Hardship Amendment. This program is targeted to customers with a permanent hardship. Examples of permanent hardships include disability subsequent to loan origination, divorce where the party remaining with the vehicle does not have the necessary income to service the debt, or death of a co-borrower. In order to qualify for this program, a customer must complete an "Income and Expense Analysis" and provide proof of income. This analysis is used to determine ability to pay and to establish realistic loan terms (which generally consist of a reduction in interest rates, but could also include principal forgiveness). The borrower must make a payment within 30 days prior to the amendment.
CFNA Adjustment of Terms (AOT). This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a permanent hardship. Payment reduction is provided through the re-amortization of the remaining loan balance, typically at a lower interest rate. Loan payments may be rescheduled over a period not to exceed 120 months. Generally, the rescheduled payment cannot be less than 50% of the original payment amount, unless the AOT is a result of a military service member's SCRA, or as a result of settlement, court order, judgment or bankruptcy. The interest rate cannot be reduced below 9% (except in the instances listed above). Customers must make a qualifying payment at the reduced payment amount in order to qualify for the modification. In addition, customers must provide proof of income and monthly obligations are validated through an updated credit report.
For general information on Citi's U.S. installment loan portfolio, see "U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans" below.
The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2010, information relating to Citi's significant long-term U.S. modification programs:
In millions of dollars | Program balance | Program start date(1) | Average interest rate reduction | Average % payment relief | Average tenor of modified loans | Deferred principal | Principal forgiveness | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending | ||||||||||||||||||||||
HAMP | $ | 2,331 | 3Q09 | 4 | % | 41 | % | 32 years | $ | 289 | $ | 2 | ||||||||||
Citi Supplemental | 835 | 4Q09 | 3 | 24 | 28 years | 46 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
HAMP Re-age | 439 | 1Q10 | N/A | N/A | 25 years | 7 | — | |||||||||||||||
2nd FDIC | 355 | 2Q09 | 7 | 48 | 25 years | 21 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
FHA/VA | 3,604 | 2 | 16 | 28 years | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustment of Terms (AOTs) | 3,700 | 3 | 23 | 29 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Other | 3,782 | 4 | 42 | 28 years | 33 | 47 | ||||||||||||||||
North America Cards | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Paydown | 2,218 | 14 | — | 60 months | ||||||||||||||||||
CCG | 1,756 | 10 | — | 60 months | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Reversal Paydown | 213 | 18 | — | 60 months | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Installment | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Auto Hardship Amendment | 723 | 9 | 28 | 51 months | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
AOTs | 1,062 | 8 | 34 | 106 months | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term programs. Citigroup has also instituted short-term programs (primarily in the U.S.) to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships. These programs include short-term (12 months or less) interest rate reductions and deferrals of past due payments. The loan volume under these short-term programs has increased significantly over the past 18 months , and loan loss reserves for these loans have been enhanced, giving consideration to the higher risk associated with those borrowers and reflecting the estimated future credit losses for those loans. See "Loan Accounting Policies" above for a further discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.
The following table presents the amounts of gross loans modified under short-term interest rate reduction programs in the U.S. as of June 30, 2010:
| June 30, 2010 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Accrual | Non-accrual | |||||
Cards | $ | 3,732 | |||||
Mortgage and real estate | 1,812 | $ | 50 | ||||
Installment and other | 1,364 | 80 | |||||
Significant short-term U.S. programs include:
Universal Payment Program (UPP). The North America cards business provides short-term interest rate reductions to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships through the UPP. Under this program, a participant's APR is reduced by at least 500 basis points for a period of up to 12 months. The minimum payment is tailored to the customer's needs and is designed to amortize at least 1% of the principal balance each month. The participant's APR returns to its original rate at the end of the term or earlier if they fail to make the required payments.
U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending
Temporary AOT. This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a temporary hardship. Examples of temporary hardships would include a short-term medical disability or a temporary reduction of pay. Under this program, the interest rate is reduced for either a five- or an eleven-month period. At the end of the temporary modification period, the interest rate reverts to the pre-modification amount. If the customer is still undergoing hardship at the conclusion of the temporary payment reduction, a second extension of the temporary terms can be considered in either of the time period increments above. In cases where the account is severely past due (over 60 days past due) at the expiration of the temporary modification period, the terms of the modification are made permanent and the payment is kept at the reduced amount for the remaining life of the loan.
U.S Installment and Other Revolving Loans
Temporary AOT. This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a temporary hardship. Under this program, the interest rate is reduced for either a five- or an eleven-month period. At the end of the temporary modification period, the interest rate reverts to the pre-modification amount. If the customer is still undergoing hardship at the conclusion
of the temporary payment reduction, a second extension of the temporary terms can be considered in either of the time period increments above. In cases where the account is severely past due (over 90 days past due) at the expiration of the temporary modification period, the terms of the modification are made permanent and the payment is kept at the reduced amount for the remaining life of the loan.
The following table set forth, as of June 30, 2010, information related to Citi's significant short-term U.S. modification programs:
In millions of dollars | Program balance | Program start date(1) | Average interest rate reduction | Average time period for reduction | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPP | $ | 3,732 | 19 | % | 12 months | ||||||
U.S. Consumer Mortgage Temporary AOT | 1,852 | 1Q09 | 3 | % | 8 months | ||||||
U.S. Installment Temporary AOT | 1,444 | 1Q09 | 5 | % | 7 months | ||||||
Payment deferrals that do not continue to accrue interest (extensions) primarily occur in the U.S. residential mortgage business. Under an extension, payments that are contractually due are deferred to a later date, thereby extending the maturity date by the number of months of payments being deferred. Extensions assist delinquent borrowers who have experienced short-term financial difficulties that have been resolved by the time the extension is granted. An extension can only be offered to borrowers who are past due on their monthly payments but have since demonstrated the ability and willingness to pay as agreed. Other payment deferrals continue to accrue interest and are not deemed to offer concessions to the customer. Other types of concessions are not material.
Please see "U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending," "North America Cards," and "U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans" below for a discussion of the impact, to date, of Citi's significant U.S. loan modification programs described above on the respective loan portfolios.
U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending
Overview
Citi's North America consumer mortgage portfolio consists of both first lien and second lien mortgages. As of June 30, 2010, the first lien mortgage portfolio totaled approximately $109 billion while the second lien mortgage portfolio was approximately $53 billion. Although the majority of the mortgage portfolio is reported inLCL within Citi Holdings, there are $18 billion of first lien mortgages and $5 billion of second lien mortgages reported in Citicorp.
Citi's first lien mortgage portfolio includes $9.6 billion of loans with Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or Veterans Administration (VA) guarantees. These portfolios consist of loans originated to low-to-moderate-income borrowers with lower FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) scores and generally have higher loan-to-value ratios (LTVs). Losses on FHA loans are borne by the sponsoring agency, provided that the insurance has not been breached as a result of an origination defect. The VA establishes a loan-level loss cap, beyond which Citi is liable for loss. FHA and VA loans have high delinquency rates but, given the guarantees, Citi has experienced negligible credit losses on these loans. The first lien mortgage portfolio also includes $1.8 billion of loans with LTVs above 80%, which have insurance through private mortgage insurance (PMI) companies, and $2.0 billion of loans subject to long-term standby commitments(1) (LTSC), with U.S. government sponsored entities (GSEs), for which Citi has limited exposure to credit losses. Citi's second lien mortgage portfolio also includes $1.5 billion of loans subject to LTSCs with GSEs, for which Citi has limited exposure to credit losses. Citi's allowance for loan loss calculations take into consideration the impact of these guarantees.
Impact of Mortgage Modification Programs on Consumer Mortgage Portfolio
As discussed in "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" above, Citigroup also offers short-term and long-term real estate loan modification programs. The main objective of these programs is generally to reduce the payment burden for the borrower and improve the net present value of cash flows. Citi monitors the performance of its real estate loan modification programs by tracking credit loss rates by vintage. At 18 months after modifying an account, in Citi's experience to date, credit loss rates are typically reduced by approximately one-third compared to accounts that were not modified.
Citigroup considers a combination of historical re-default rates, the current economic environment, and the nature of the modification program in forecasting expected cash flows in the determination of the allowance for loan losses on TDRs. With respect to HAMP, contractual modifications of loans that successfully completed the HAMP trial period began in the third quarter of 2009; accordingly, this is the earliest HAMP vintage available for comparison. While Citi continues to evaluate the impact of HAMP, Citi's experience to date is that re-default rates are likely to be lower for HAMP-modified loans as compared to Citi Supplemental modifications due to what it believes to be the deeper payment and interest rate reductions associated with HAMP modifications.
Consumer Mortgage Quarterly Trends—Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses
The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for the Citi's first and second lien North America consumer mortgage portfolios.
In the first lien mortgage portfolio, as previously disclosed, both delinquencies and net credit losses have continued to be impacted by the HAMP trial loans and the growing backlog of foreclosures in process. As previously disclosed, loans in the HAMP trial modification period that do not make their original contractual payments are reported as delinquent, even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower. Upon conclusion of the trial period, loans that are not modified permanently are returned to the delinquency status in which they began their trial period, adjusted for the number of payments received during the trial period. If the loans are modified permanently, they will be returned to current status.
In addition, the growing amount of foreclosures in process, which continues to be related to an industry-wide phenomenon resulting from foreclosure moratoria and other efforts to prevent or forestall foreclosure, have specific implications for the portfolio:
As set forth in the charts below, both first and second lien mortgages experienced fewer 90 days or more delinquencies in the second quarter of 2010, which led to lower net credit losses in the quarter as well. For first lien mortgages, the sequential improvement in 90 days or more delinquencies was driven entirely by asset sales and HAMP trials converting into permanent modifications. In the quarter, Citi sold $1.3 billion in delinquent mortgages. As of June 30, 2010, $2.5 billion of HAMP trial modifications in Citi's on-balance sheet portfolio were converted to permanent modifications, up from $1.6 billion at the end of the first quarter of 2010. For second lien mortgages, the net credit loss decrease during the quarter was driven by roll rate improvement.
Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans 90 days or more past due exclude loans recorded at fair value and U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored agencies because the potential loss predominately resides with the U.S. agencies.
Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans 90 days or more past due exclude loans recorded at fair value and U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored agencies because the potential loss predominately resides with the U.S. agencies.
Consumer Mortgage FICO and LTV
Data appearing in the tables below have been sourced from Citigroup's risk systems and, as such, may not reconcile with disclosures elsewhere generally due to differences in methodology or variations in the manner in which information is captured. Citi has noted such variations in instances where it believes they could be material to reconcile the information presented elsewhere.
Citi's credit risk policy is not to offer option adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs)/negative amortizing mortgage products to its customers. As a result, option ARMs/negative amortizing mortgages represent an insignificant portion of total balances since they were acquired only incidentally as part of prior portfolio and business purchases.
A portion of loans in the U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio currently requires a payment to satisfy only the current accrued interest for the payment period, or an interest-only payment. Citi's mortgage portfolio includes approximately $28 billion of first- and second- lien home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) that are still within their revolving period and have not commenced amortization. The interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for the HELOC product across the industry. The first lien mortgage portfolio contains approximately $30 billion of ARMs that are currently required to make an interest-only payment. These loans will be required to make a fully amortizing payment upon expiration of their interest-only payment period, and most will do so within a few years of origination. Borrowers that are currently required to make an interest-only payment cannot select a lower payment that would negatively amortize the loan. First lien mortgage loans with this payment feature are primarily to high credit quality borrowers that have on average significantly higher refreshed FICO scores than other loans in the first lien mortgage portfolio.
Loan Balances
First Lien Mortgages—Loan Balances. As a consequence of the difficult economic environment and the decrease in housing prices, LTV and FICO scores have generally deteriorated since origination, as depicted in the table below. On a refreshed basis, approximately 31% of first lien mortgages had a LTV ratio above 100%, compared to approximately 0% at origination. Approximately 29% of the first lien mortgages had FICO scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis, compared to 16% at origination.
Balances: June 30, 2010—First Lien Mortgages
At Origination | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 58 | % | 6 | % | 7 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 13 | % | 7 | % | 9 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | NM | NM | NM |
Refreshed | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 26 | % | 4 | % | 9 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 18 | % | 3 | % | 9 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | 16 | % | 4 | % | 11 | % |
Note: NM—Not meaningful. First lien mortgage table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico. Table excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs. Table also excludes $1.7 billion from At Origination balances and $0.4 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. Balances exclude deferred fees/costs. Refreshed FICO scores based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Loan Performance Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index.
Second Lien Mortgages—Loan Balances. In the second lien mortgage portfolio, the majority of loans are in the higher FICO categories. The challenging economic conditions have generally caused a migration towards lower FICO scores and higher LTV ratios. Approximately 47% of second lien mortgages had refreshed LTVs above 100%, compared to approximately 0% at origination. Approximately 18% of second lien mortgages had FICO scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis, compared to 3% at origination.
Balances: June 30, 2010—Second Lien Mortgages
At Origination | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 49 | % | 2 | % | 2 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 43 | % | 3 | % | 1 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | NM | NM | NM |
Refreshed | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 22 | % | 1 | % | 3 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 21 | % | 2 | % | 4 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | 32 | % | 4 | % | 11 | % | ||||
Note: N.M.—Not meaningful. Second lien mortgage table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico. Table excludes loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs. Table also excludes $1.6 billion from At Origination balances and $0.4 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. Refreshed FICO scores are based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Loan Performance Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index.
Delinquencies
The tables below provide delinquency statistics for loans 90 or more days past due (90+DPD), as a percentage of outstandings in each of the FICO/LTV combinations, in both the first lien and second lien mortgage portfolios. For example, loans with FICO ³ 660 and LTV £ 80% at origination have a 90+DPD rate of 5.8%.
Loans with FICO scores of less than 620 exhibit significantly higher delinquencies than in any other FICO band. Similarly, loans with LTVs greater than 100% have higher delinquencies than LTVs of less than or equal to 100%.
Delinquencies: 90+DPD Rates—First Lien Mortgages
At Origination | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 5.8 | % | 11.0 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 8.1 | % | 13.5 | % | 16.8 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | NM | NM | NM |
Refreshed | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 0.3 | % | 3.3 | % | 15.0 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 0.8 | % | 7.8 | % | 22.6 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | 2.0 | % | 15.4 | % | 30.3 | % | ||||
Note: NM—Not meaningful. 90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the tables above.
Delinquencies: 90+DPD Rates—Second Lien Mortgages
At Origination | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 1.6 | % | 4.2 | % | 5.1 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 3.7 | % | 4.9 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | NM | NM | NM |
Refreshed | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 0.1 | % | 1.2 | % | 8.2 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 0.1 | % | 1.3 | % | 9.6 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | 0.4 | % | 3.1 | % | 16.6 | % |
Note: NM—Not meaningful. 90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the tables above.
Origination Channel, Geographic Distribution and Origination Vintage
The following tables detail Citi's first and second lien U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio by origination channels, geographic distribution and origination vintage.
By Origination Channel
Citi's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio has been originated from three main channels: retail, broker and correspondent.
First Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
As of June 30, 2010, approximately 54% of the first lien mortgage portfolio was originated through third-party channels. Given that loans originated through correspondents have exhibited higher 90+DPD delinquency rates than retail originated mortgages, Citi terminated business with a number of correspondent sellers in 2007 and 2008. During 2008, Citi also severed relationships with a number of brokers, only maintaining those who have produced strong, high-quality and profitable volume.
CHANNEL ($ in billions) | First Lien Mortgages | Channel % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Retail | $ | 44.4 | 46.3 | % | 5.2 | % | $ | 13.6 | $ | 9.5 | ||||||
Broker | $ | 16.7 | 17.4 | % | 8.2 | % | $ | 3.1 | $ | 5.6 | ||||||
Correspondent | $ | 34.8 | 36.3 | % | 12.3 | % | $ | 11.6 | $ | 13.9 |
Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans subject to LTSCs.
Second Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
For second lien mortgages, approximately 48% of the loans were originated through third-party channels. As these mortgages have demonstrated a higher incidence of delinquencies, Citi no longer originates second mortgages through third-party channels.
CHANNEL ($ in billions) | Second Lien Mortgages | Channel % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Retail | $ | 23.9 | 52.2 | % | 1.8 | % | $ | 3.8 | $ | 7.1 | ||||||
Broker | $ | 11.3 | 24.8 | % | 3.8 | % | $ | 2.0 | $ | 6.8 | ||||||
Correspondent | $ | 10.5 | 23.0 | % | 4.1 | % | $ | 2.5 | $ | 7.5 |
Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.
By State
Approximately half of the Citi's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio is located in five states: California, New York, Florida, Illinois and Texas. These states represent 50% of first lien mortgages and 55% of second lien mortgages.
Florida and Illinois have above average 90+DPD delinquency rates. Florida has 54% of its first mortgage lien portfolio with refreshed LTV>100%, compared to 30% overall for first lien mortgages. Illinois has 45% of its loan portfolio with refreshed LTV>100%. Texas, despite having 41% of its portfolio with FICO<620, has a lower delinquency rate relative to the overall portfolio. Texas has 5% of its loan portfolio with refreshed LTV>100%.
First Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
STATES ($ in billions) | First Lien Mortgages | State % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | $ | 26.1 | 27.2 | % | 7.2 | % | $ | 4.0 | $ | 10.0 | ||||||
New York | $ | 7.9 | 8.2 | % | 6.4 | % | $ | 1.5 | $ | 0.9 | ||||||
Florida | $ | 5.8 | 6.1 | % | 13.0 | % | $ | 2.1 | $ | 3.1 | ||||||
Illinois | $ | 4.0 | 4.2 | % | 9.8 | % | $ | 1.3 | $ | 1.8 | ||||||
Texas | $ | 3.9 | 4.1 | % | 5.7 | % | $ | 1.6 | $ | 0.2 | ||||||
Others | $ | 48.2 | 50.2 | % | 8.7 | % | $ | 17.9 | $ | 13.1 |
Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans subject to LTSCs.
In the second lien mortgage portfolio, Florida continues to experience above-average delinquencies, with approximately 71% of their loans with refreshed LTV > 100% compared to 47% overall for second lien mortgages.
Second Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
STATES ($ in billions) | Second Lien Mortgages | State % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | $ | 12.8 | 27.9 | % | 3.0 | % | $ | 1.8 | $ | 6.4 | ||||||
New York | $ | 6.3 | 13.8 | % | 2.2 | % | $ | 0.9 | $ | 1.4 | ||||||
Florida | $ | 2.9 | 6.4 | % | 4.8 | % | $ | 0.7 | $ | 2.1 | ||||||
Illinois | $ | 1.8 | 3.9 | % | 2.6 | % | $ | 0.3 | $ | 1.1 | ||||||
Texas | $ | 1.3 | 2.8 | % | 1.3 | % | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.4 | ||||||
Others | $ | 20.7 | 45.2 | % | 2.7 | % | $ | 4.4 | $ | 9.9 |
Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.
By Vintage
For Citigroup's combined U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio (first and second lien mortgages), approximately half of the portfolio consists of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which demonstrate above average delinquencies. In first mortgages, approximately 43% of the portfolio is of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which have 90+DPD rates well above the overall portfolio rate. In second mortgages, 62% of the portfolio is of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which again have higher delinquencies compared to the overall portfolio rate.
First Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
VINTAGES ($ in billions) | First Lien Mortgages | Vintage % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | $ | 0.7 | 0.7 | % | 0.0 | % | $ | 0.1 | $ | 0.1 | ||||||
2009 | $ | 3.8 | 4.0 | % | 0.7 | % | $ | 0.5 | $ | 0.2 | ||||||
2008 | $ | 12.3 | 12.9 | % | 4.9 | % | $ | 2.8 | $ | 2.5 | ||||||
2007 | $ | 23.9 | 25.0 | % | 12.2 | % | $ | 8.7 | $ | 11.6 | ||||||
2006 | $ | 17.1 | 17.8 | % | 10.7 | % | $ | 5.4 | $ | 8.1 | ||||||
2005 | $ | 16.5 | 17.2 | % | 6.6 | % | $ | 3.9 | $ | 5.1 | ||||||
£ 2004 | $ | 21.6 | 22.5 | % | 6.9 | % | $ | 6.8 | $ | 1.5 |
Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans subject to LTSCs.
Second Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
VINTAGES ($ in billions) | Second Lien Mortgages | Vintage % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | $ | 0.1 | 0.3 | % | 0.0 | % | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.0 | ||||||
2009 | $ | 0.6 | 1.3 | % | 0.2 | % | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.0 | ||||||
2008 | $ | 4.0 | 8.8 | % | 1.1 | % | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.7 | ||||||
2007 | $ | 13.4 | 29.4 | % | 3.2 | % | $ | 2.7 | $ | 7.2 | ||||||
2006 | $ | 14.7 | 32.2 | % | 3.4 | % | $ | 2.9 | $ | 8.9 | ||||||
2005 | $ | 8.8 | 19.2 | % | 2.6 | % | $ | 1.4 | $ | 4.0 | ||||||
£ 2004 | $ | 4.0 | 8.7 | % | 1.7 | % | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.5 |
Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.
North America Cards
Overview
Citi's North America cards portfolio consists of our Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios located in Citicorp—Regional Consumer Banking and Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, the Citi-branded portfolio totaled approximately $77 billion, while the retail partner cards portfolio was approximately $50 billion.
Impact of Loss Mitigation and Cards Modification Programs on Cards Portfolios
In each of its Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios, Citi continues to actively eliminate riskier accounts to mitigate losses. Higher risk customers have either had their available lines of credit reduced or their accounts closed. On a net basis, end of period open accounts are down 15% in Citi-branded cards and down 13% in retail partner cards versus prior-year levels.
As previously disclosed, in Citi's experience to date, these portfolios have significantly different characteristics:
As a result, loss mitigation efforts, such as stricter underwriting standards for new accounts, decreasing higher risk credit lines, closing high risk accounts and re-pricing, have tended to affect the retail partner cards portfolio faster than the branded portfolio.
In addition to tightening credit standards, Citi also offers short-term and long-term cards modification programs, as discussed under "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" above. Citigroup monitors the performance of these U.S. credit card short-term and long-term modification programs by tracking cumulative loss rates by vintages (when customers enter a program) and comparing that performance with that of similar accounts whose terms were not modified. For example, as previously reported, for U.S. credit cards, in Citi's experience to date, at 24 months after modifying an account, Citi typically reduces credit losses by approximately one-third compared to similar accounts that were not modified. This improved performance of modified loans relative to those not modified has generally been the greatest during the first 12 months after modification. Following that period, losses have tended to increase, but have typically stabilized at levels which are still below those for similar loans that were not modified, resulting in an improved cumulative loss performance. In addition, during the second quarter of 2010, Citi placed fewer accounts into these programs and the results for these programs have remained positive.
Overall, however, Citi continues to believe that net credit losses in each of its cards portfolios will likely continue to remain at elevated levels and will continue to be highly dependent on macroeconomic conditions and industry changes, including continued implementation of the CARD Act.
Cards Quarterly Trends—Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses
The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for Citigroup'sNorth America Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios.
During the second quarter of 2010, Citi continued to see stable to improving trends across both portfolios, based in part, it believes, on its loss mitigation programs, as previously discussed. Across both portfolios, delinquencies declined during the second quarter of 2010. In Citi-branded cards, net credit losses declined sequentially. On a percentage basis, however, net credit losses were up in Citi-branded cards due to declining loan balances. In retail partner cards, net credit losses declined for the fourth consecutive quarter.
Note: Includes Puerto Rico.
Note: Includes Canada and Puerto Rico. Includes Installment Lending.
North America Cards—FICO Information
As set forth in the table below, approximately 73% of the Citi-branded portfolio had FICO credit scores of at least 660 on a refreshed basis as of June 30, 2010, while 65% of the retail partner cards portfolio had scores above 660.
Balances: June 30, 2010
Refreshed | Citi Branded | Retail Partners | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO ³ 660 | 73 | % | 65 | % | |||
620 £ FICO < 660 | 11 | % | 13 | % | |||
FICO < 620 | 16 | % | 22 | % |
Note: Based on balances of $120 billion. Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico and Installment and Classified portfolios. Excludes balances where FICO was unavailable ($2.4 billion for Citi-branded, $2.1 billion for retail partner cards).
The table below provides delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD for both the Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios as of June 30, 2010. Given the economic environment, customers have generally migrated down from higher FICO score ranges, driven by their delinquencies with Citi and/or with other creditors. As these customers roll through the delinquency buckets, they materially damage their credit score and may ultimately go to charge-off. Loans 90+DPD are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquency has been reported by Citigroup to the credit bureaus. Loans with FICO scores less than 620, which constitute 16% of the Citi-branded portfolio, have a 90+DPD rate of 16.3%; in the retail partner cards portfolio, loans with FICO scores less than 620 constitute 22% of the portfolio and have a 90+DPD rate of 16.7%.
90+DPD Delinquency Rate: June 30, 2010
Refreshed | Citi Branded 90+DPD% | Retail Partners 90+DPD% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO ³ 660 | 0.2 | % | 0.2 | % | |||
620 £ FICO < 660 | 0.7 | % | 0.8 | % | |||
FICO < 620 | 16.3 | % | 16.7 | % |
Note: Based on balances of $120 billion. Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico and Installment and Classified portfolios.
U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans
In the table below, the U.S. installment portfolio consists of consumer loans in the following businesses: Consumer Finance, Retail Banking, Auto, Student Lending and Cards. Other Revolving consists of consumer loans (Ready Credit and Checking Plus products) in the Consumer Retail Banking business. Commercial-related loans are not included.
As of June 30, 2010, the U.S. Installment portfolio totaled approximately $64 billion, while the U.S. Other Revolving portfolio was approximately $0.9 billion. While substantially all of the U.S. Installment portfolio is reported inLCL within Citi Holdings, it does include $0.4 billion of Consumer Retail Banking loans which are reported in Citicorp. The U.S. Other Revolving portfolio is managed under Citicorp. As of June 30, 2010, the U.S. Installment portfolio included approximately $33 billion of Student Loans originated under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) where losses are substantially mitigated by federal guarantees if the loans are properly serviced. In addition, there were approximately $6 billion of non-FFELP Student Loans where losses are mitigated by private insurance. These insurance providers insure Citi against a significant portion of losses arising from borrower loan default, bankruptcy or death.
Approximately 37% of the Installment portfolio had FICO credit scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis. Approximately 26% of the Other Revolving portfolio is composed of loans having FICO less than 620.
Balances: June 30, 2010
Refreshed | Installment | Other Revolving | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO ³ 660 | 50 | % | 59 | % | |||
620 £ FICO < 660 | 13 | % | 15 | % | |||
FICO < 620 | 37 | % | 26 | % |
Note: Based on balances of $62 billion for Installment and $0.8 billion for Other Revolving. Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico. Excludes balances where FICO was unavailable ($1.6 billion for Installment, $0.1 billion for Other Revolving).
The table below provides delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD for both the Installment and Other Revolving portfolios. Loans 90+DPD are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquency has been reported by Citigroup to the credit bureaus. On a refreshed basis, loans with FICO scores of less than 620 exhibit significantly higher delinquencies than in any other FICO band and will drive the majority of the losses.
90+DPD Delinquency Rate: June 30, 2010
Refreshed | Installment 90+DPD% | Other Revolving 90+DPD% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO ³ 660 | 0.2 | % | 0.4 | % | |||
620 £ FICO < 660 | 1.3 | % | 1.3 | % | |||
FICO < 620 | 7.7 | % | 6.6 | % |
Note: Based on balances of $62 billion for Installment and $0.8 billion for Other Revolving. Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico.
Interest Rate Risk Associated with Consumer Mortgage Lending Activity
Citigroup originates and funds mortgage loans. As with all other lending activity, this exposes Citigroup to several risks, including credit, liquidity and interest rate risks. To manage credit and liquidity risk, Citigroup sells most of the mortgage loans it originates, but retains the servicing rights. These sale transactions create an intangible asset referred to as mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). The fair value of this asset is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. The fair value of MSRs declines with increased prepayments, and lower interest rates are generally one factor that tends to lead to increased prepayments. Thus, by retaining risks of sold mortgage loans, Citigroup is exposed to interest rate risk.
In managing this risk, Citigroup hedges a significant portion of the value of its MSRs through the use of interest rate derivative contracts, forward purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and purchased securities classified as trading (primarily mortgage-backed securities including principal-only strips).
Since the change in the value of these hedging instruments does not perfectly match the change in the value of the MSRs, Citigroup is still exposed to what is commonly referred to as "basis risk." Citigroup manages this risk by reviewing the mix of the various hedging instruments referred to above on a daily basis.
Citigroup's MSRs totaled $4.894 billion and $6.530 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. For additional information on Citi's MSRs, see Notes 11 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
As part of the mortgage lending activity, Citigroup commonly enters into purchase commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at specific interest rates within a given period of time, generally up to 60 days after the rate has been set. If the resulting loans from these commitments will be classified as loans held-for-sale, Citigroup accounts for the commitments as derivatives. Accordingly, the initial and subsequent changes in the fair value of these commitments, which are driven by changes in mortgage interest rates, are recognized in current earnings after taking into consideration the likelihood that the commitment will be funded.
Citigroup hedges its exposure to the change in the value of these commitments by utilizing hedging instruments similar to those referred to above.
Direct Exposure to Monolines
CORPORATE CREDIT PORTFOLIO
Through Citi Holdings—Special Asset Pool,The following table presents credit data for Citigroup's corporate loans and unfunded lending commitments at June 30, 2010. The ratings scale is based on Citi's internal risk ratings, which generally correspond to the Company has exposure to various monoline bond insurers (Monolines), listedratings as defined by S&P and Moody's.
| At June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corporate loans(1) in millions of dollars | Recorded investment in loans(2) | % of total(3) | Unfunded lending commitments | % of total(3) | |||||||||||
Investment grade(4) | $ | 118,470 | 69 | % | $ | 231,863 | 87 | % | |||||||
Non-investment grade(4) | |||||||||||||||
Noncriticized | 21,312 | 12 | 16,911 | 6 | |||||||||||
Criticized performing(5) | 21,065 | 12 | 14,108 | 6 | |||||||||||
Commercial real estate (CRE) | 5,623 | 3 | 1,781 | 1 | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial and Other | 15,442 | 9 | 12,327 | 5 | |||||||||||
Non-accrual (criticized)(5) | 11,036 | 6 | 3,043 | 1 | |||||||||||
CRE | 2,568 | 1 | 988 | — | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial and Other | 8,468 | 5 | 2,055 | 1 | |||||||||||
Total non-investment grade | $ | 53,413 | 31 | % | $ | 34,062 | 13 | % | |||||||
Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis(4) | 13,738 | 2,216 | |||||||||||||
Loans at fair value | 2,358 | — | |||||||||||||
Total corporate loans | $ | 187,979 | $ | 268,141 | |||||||||||
Unearned income | (1,259 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
Corporate loans, net of unearned income | $ | 186,720 | $ | 268,141 | |||||||||||
The following tables represent the corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking), before consideration of collateral, by maturity at June 30, 2010. The corporate portfolio is broken out by direct outstandings that include drawn loans, overdrafts, interbank placements, bankers' acceptances, certain investment securities and leases and unfunded commitments that include unused commitments to lend, letters of credit and financial guarantees.
| At June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Due within 1 year | Greater than 1 year but within 5 years | Greater than 5 years | Total exposure | |||||||||
Direct outstandings | $ | 177 | $ | 46 | $ | 8 | $ | 231 | |||||
Unfunded lending commitments | 159 | 94 | 10 | 263 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 336 | $ | 140 | $ | 18 | $ | 494 | |||||
| At December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Due within 1 year | Greater than 1 year but within 5 years | Greater than 5 years | Total exposure | |||||||||
Direct outstandings | $ | 213 | $ | 66 | $ | 7 | $ | 286 | |||||
Unfunded lending commitments | 182 | 120 | 10 | 312 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 395 | $ | 186 | $ | 17 | $ | 598 | |||||
Portfolio Mix
The corporate credit portfolio is diverse across counterparty, and industry and geography. The following table shows direct outstandings and unfunded commitments by region:
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
North America | 47 | % | 51 | % | |||
EMEA | 30 | 27 | |||||
Latin America | 7 | 9 | |||||
Asia | 16 | 13 | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
The maintenance of accurate and consistent risk ratings across the corporate credit portfolio facilitates the comparison of credit exposure across all lines of business, geographic regions and products.
Obligor risk ratings reflect an estimated probability of default for an obligor and are derived primarily through the use of statistical models (which are validated periodically), external rating agencies (under defined circumstances) or approved scoring methodologies. Facility risk ratings are assigned, using the obligor risk rating, and then factors that affect the loss given default of the facility, such as support or collateral, are taken into account. With regard to climate change risk, factors evaluated include consideration of the business impact, impact of regulatory requirements, or lack thereof, and impact of physical effects on obligors and their assets.
These factors may adversely affect the ability of some obligors to perform and thus increase the risk of lending activities to these obligors. Citigroup also has incorporated climate risk assessment criteria for certain obligors, as necessary.
Internal obligor ratings equivalent to BBB and above are considered investment grade. Ratings below the equivalent of the BBB category are considered non-investment grade.
The following table presents the corporate credit portfolio by facility risk rating at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, as a percentage of the total portfolio:
| Direct outstandings and unfunded commitments | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
AAA/AA/A | 55 | % | 58 | % | |||
BBB | 25 | 24 | |||||
BB/B | 13 | 11 | |||||
CCC or below | 7 | 7 | |||||
Unrated | — | — | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
The corporate credit portfolio is diversified by industry, with a concentration only in the financial sector, including banks, other financial institutions, insurance companies, investment banks, and government and central banks. The following table shows the allocation of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments to industries as a percentage of the total corporate portfolio:
| Direct outstandings and unfunded commitments | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
Government and central banks | 12 | % | 12 | % | |||
Banks | 8 | 9 | |||||
Investment banks | 7 | 5 | |||||
Other financial institutions | 5 | 12 | |||||
Petroleum | 5 | 4 | |||||
Utilities | 4 | 4 | |||||
Insurance | 4 | 4 | |||||
Agriculture and food preparation | 4 | 4 | |||||
Telephone and cable | 3 | 3 | |||||
Industrial machinery and equipment | 3 | 2 | |||||
Real estate | 3 | 3 | |||||
Global information technology | 2 | 2 | |||||
Chemicals | 2 | 2 | |||||
Other industries(1) | 38 | 34 | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
Credit Risk Mitigation
As part of its overall risk management activities, Citigroup uses credit derivatives and other risk mitigants to hedge portions of the credit risk in its portfolio, in addition to outright asset sales. The purpose of these transactions is to transfer credit risk to third parties. The results of the mark-to-market and any realized gains or losses on credit derivatives are reflected in thePrincipal transactions line on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $49.2 billion and $59.6 billion, respectively, of credit risk exposure were economically hedged. Citigroup's loss model used in the calculation of its loan loss reserve does not include the favorable impact of credit derivatives and other risk mitigants. In addition, the reported amounts of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments in this report do not reflect the impact of these hedging transactions. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying credit exposure with the following risk rating distribution, respectively:
Rating of Hedged Exposure
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAA/AA/A | 48 | % | 45 | % | |||
BBB | 36 | 37 | |||||
BB/B | 11 | 11 | |||||
CCC or below | 5 | 7 | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying credit exposure with the following industry distribution:
Industry of Hedged Exposure
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Utilities | 6 | % | 9 | % | |||
Telephone and cable | 7 | 9 | |||||
Agriculture and food preparation | 8 | 8 | |||||
Chemicals | 7 | 8 | |||||
Petroleum | 6 | 6 | |||||
Industrial machinery and equipment | 4 | 6 | |||||
Autos | 7 | 6 | |||||
Retail | 5 | 4 | |||||
Insurance | 4 | 4 | |||||
Other financial institutions | 7 | 4 | |||||
Pharmaceuticals | 4 | 5 | |||||
Natural gas distribution | 4 | 3 | |||||
Metals | 4 | 4 | |||||
Global information technology | 3 | 3 | |||||
Other industries(1) | 24 | 21 | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
Market risk encompasses liquidity risk and price risk, both of which arise in the normal course of business of a global financial intermediary. Liquidity risk is the risk that an entity may be unable to meet a financial commitment to a customer, creditor, or investor when due. Liquidity risk is discussed in "Capital Resources and Liquidity" above. Price risk is the earnings risk from hedgeschanges in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, and in their implied volatilities. Price risk arises in non-trading portfolios, as well as in trading portfolios.
Interest Rate Exposure (IRE) for Non-Trading Portfolios
The exposures in the following table represent the approximate annualized risk to net interest revenue (NIR), assuming an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100 basis points change, as well as a more gradual 100 basis points (25 basis points per quarter) parallel change in rates compared with the market forward interest rates in selected currencies.
| June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Increase | Decrease | Increase | Decrease | Increase | Decrease | |||||||||||
U.S. dollar | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | (264 | ) | NM | $ | (488 | ) | NM | $ | (1,191 | ) | NM | |||||
Gradual change | $ | (179 | ) | NM | $ | (110 | ) | NM | $ | (694 | ) | NM | |||||
Mexican peso | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | 60 | $(60) | $ | 42 | (42) | $ | (21 | ) | 21 | |||||||
Gradual change | $ | 33 | $(33) | $ | 21 | (21) | $ | (15 | ) | 15 | |||||||
Euro | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | 13 | NM | $ | (56 | ) | NM | $ | 26 | $ | (25 | ) | |||||
Gradual change | $ | 3 | NM | $ | (50 | ) | NM | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 4 | |||||
Japanese yen | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | 133 | NM | $ | 148 | NM | $ | 207 | NM | ||||||||
Gradual change | $ | 89 | NM | $ | 97 | NM | $ | 119 | NM | ||||||||
Pound sterling | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | 16 | NM | $ | (3 | ) | NM | $ | (8 | ) | 8 | ||||||
Gradual change | $ | 8 | NM | $ | (5 | ) | NM | $ | (14 | ) | 14 | ||||||
NM Not meaningful. A 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would imply negative rates for the yield curve.
The changes in the U.S. dollar IRE from the previous quarter reflect changes in the customer-related asset and liability mix, the expected impact of market rates on certain investmentscustomer behavior and Citigroup's view of prevailing interest rates. The changes from tradingthe prior-year quarter primarily reflect modeling of mortgages and deposits based on lower rates, pricing changes due to the CARD Act, debt issuance and swapping activities, offset by repositioning of the liquidity portfolio.
Certain trading-oriented businesses within Citi have accrual-accounted positions. The hedges are composedU.S. dollar IRE associated with these businesses is ($147) million for a 100 basis point instantaneous increase in interest rates.
The following table shows the risk to NIR from six different changes in the implied-forward rates. Each scenario assumes that the rate change will occur on a gradual basis every three months over the course of credit default swapsone year.
| Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | Scenario 3 | Scenario 4 | Scenario 5 | Scenario 6 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overnight rate change (bps) | — | 100 | 200 | (200 | ) | (100 | ) | — | |||||||||||
10-year rate change (bps) | (100 | ) | — | 100 | (100 | ) | — | 100 | |||||||||||
Impact to net interest revenue | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (86 | ) | $ | (371 | ) | NM | NM | $ | (49 | ) | |||||
NM Not meaningful. A 100 basis point or more decrease in the overnight rate would imply negative rates for the yield curve.
Value at Risk for Trading Portfolios
For Citigroup's major trading centers, the aggregate pretax value at risk (VAR) in the trading portfolios was $214 million, $172 million, $205 million, and other hedge instruments. The Company recorded a reduction of $157$277 million CVA relatedat June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and June 30, 2009, respectively. Daily Citigroup trading VAR averaged $188 million and ranged from $163 million to exposure to Monolines$219 million during the second quarter of 2009, bringing the total CVA balance to $5.2 billion.2010.
The following table summarizes VAR for Citigroup trading portfolios at June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, and June 30, 2009, including the total VAR, the specific risk-only component of VAR, the isolated general market factor VARs, along with the quarterly averages. On April 30, 2010, Citigroup concluded its implementation of exponentially weighted market factor volatilities for Interest rate and FX positions to the VAR calculation. This methodology uses the higher of short- and long-term annualized volatilities. This enhancement resulted in a 31% increase inS&B VAR, and a 24% increase in Citigroup consolidated VAR, reported at June 30, 2010.
In million of dollars | June 30, 2010 | Second Quarter 2010 Average | March 31, 2010 | First Quarter 2010 Average | June 30, 2009 | Second Quarter 2009 Average | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest rate | $ | 244 | $ | 224 | $ | 201 | $ | 193 | $ | 226 | $ | 217 | |||||||
Foreign exchange | 57 | 57 | 53 | 51 | 84 | 61 | |||||||||||||
Equity | 71 | 64 | 49 | 73 | 65 | 94 | |||||||||||||
Commodity | 24 | 21 | 17 | 18 | 36 | 38 | |||||||||||||
Diversification benefit | (182 | ) | (178 | ) | (148 | ) | (135 | ) | (134 | ) | (150 | ) | |||||||
Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk | $ | 214 | $ | 188 | $ | 172 | $ | 200 | $ | 277 | $ | 260 | |||||||
Specific risk-only component(1) | $ | 17 | $ | 16 | $ | 15 | $ | 20 | $ | 18 | $ | 20 | |||||||
Total—General market factors only | $ | 197 | $ | 172 | $ | 157 | $ | 180 | $ | 259 | $ | 240 | |||||||
The table below provides the range of market factor VARs, inclusive of specific risk, across the quarters ended:
| June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | |||||||||||||
Interest rate | $ | 198 | $ | 270 | $ | 171 | $ | 228 | $ | 193 | $ | 240 | |||||||
Foreign exchange | 36 | 94 | 37 | 78 | 31 | 91 | |||||||||||||
Equity | 48 | 89 | 47 | 111 | 50 | 153 | |||||||||||||
Commodity | 15 | 27 | 15 | 20 | 26 | 50 | |||||||||||||
The following table provides the VAR forS&B for the second quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2010:
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk | $ | 176 | $ | 104 | |||
Average—during quarter | 139 | 144 | |||||
High—during quarter | 180 | 235 | |||||
Low—during quarter | 100 | 99 | |||||
INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS
Average Rates—Interest Revenue, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Margin
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009(1) | Change 2Q10 vs. 2Q09 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest revenue(2) | $ | 20,418 | $ | 20,852 | $ | 19,671 | 4 | % | |||||
Interest expense(3) | 6,379 | 6,291 | 6,842 | (7 | )% | ||||||||
Net interest revenue(2)(3) | $ | 14,039 | $ | 14,561 | 12,829 | 9 | % | ||||||
Interest revenue—average rate | 4.57 | % | 4.75 | % | 4.97 | % | (40 | ) bps | |||||
Interest expense—average rate | 1.60 | % | 1.60 | % | 1.93 | % | (33 | ) bps | |||||
Net interest margin | 3.15 | % | 3.32 | % | 3.24 | % | (9 | ) bps | |||||
Interest-rate benchmarks: | |||||||||||||
Federal Funds rate—end of period | 0.00-0.25 | % | 0.00-0.25 | % | 0.00-0.25 | % | — | ||||||
Federal Funds rate—average rate | 0.00-0.25 | % | 0.00-0.25 | % | 0.00-0.25 | % | — | ||||||
Two-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate | 0.87 | % | 0.92 | % | 1.02 | % | (15 | ) bps | |||||
10-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate | 3.49 | % | 3.72 | % | 3.32 | % | 17 | bps | |||||
10-year vs. two-year spread | 262 | bps | 280 | bps | 230 | bps | |||||||
A significant portion of the Company's direct exposuresbusiness activities are based upon gathering deposits and borrowing money and then lending or investing those funds, including market-making activities in tradable securities. Net interest margin (NIM) is calculated by dividing annualized gross interest revenue less gross interest expense by average interest earning assets.
NIM decreased by 17 basis points during the second quarter of 2010 due to the continued de-risking of loan portfolios, the expansion of loss mitigation efforts and the corresponding notional amounts of transactions with the various Monolines as well as the aggregate credit valuation adjustment associated with these exposures as of June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009.
| June 30, 2009 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Fair- value exposure | Notional amount of transactions | Fair- value exposure | Notional amount of transactions | |||||||||
Direct subprime ABS CDO super senior—Ambac | $ | 4,525 | $ | 5,328 | $ | 4,649 | $ | 5,352 | |||||
Trading assets—non-subprime: | |||||||||||||
MBIA | $ | 2,123 | $ | 3,868 | $ | 2,209 | $ | 4,567 | |||||
FSA | 128 | 1,108 | 294 | 1,119 | |||||||||
Assured | 126 | 466 | 147 | 454 | |||||||||
Radian | 19 | 150 | 39 | 150 | |||||||||
Ambac | — | 407 | 19 | 821 | |||||||||
Subtotal trading assets—non-subprime | $ | 2,396 | $ | 5,999 | $ | 2,708 | $ | 7,111 | |||||
Total gross fair-value direct exposure | $ | 6,921 | $ | 7,357 | |||||||||
Credit valuation adjustment | (5,213 | ) | (5,370 | ) | |||||||||
Total net fair-value direct exposure | $ | 1,708 | $ | 1,987 | |||||||||
The fair-value exposure, net of payable and receivable positions, represents the market value of the contract as of June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively, excluding the CVA. The notional amount of the transactions, including both long and short positions, is used as a reference value to calculate payments. The CVA is a downward adjustment to the fair-value exposure to a counterparty to reflect the counterparty's creditworthiness in respect of the obligations in question.
Credit valuation adjustments are based on credit spreads and on estimates of the terms and timing of the payment obligations of the Monolines. Timing in turn depends on estimates of the performance of the transactions to which the Company's exposure relates, estimates of whether and when liquidation of such transactions may occur and other factors, each considered in the context of the terms of the Monolines' obligations.
As of June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the Company had $6.3 billion and $6.6 billion, respectively, in notional amount of hedges against its direct subprime ABS CDO super senior positions. Of those amounts, $5.3 billion and $5.4 billion, respectively, were purchased from Monolines and are included in the notional amount of transactions in the table above.
With respect to Citi's trading assets, there were $2.4 billion and $2.7 billion of fair-value exposure to Monolines as of June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively. Trading assets include trading positions, both long and short, in U.S. subprime RMBS and related products, including ABS CDOs.
The notional amount of transactions related to the remaining non-subprime trading assets as of June 30, 2009 was $6.0 billion. The $6.0 billion notional amount of transactions comprised $955 million primarily in interest-rate swaps with a corresponding fair value exposure of $2.1 million net payable. The remaining notional amount of $5.0 billion was in the form of credit default swaps and total return swaps with a fair value exposure of $2.4 billion.
The notional amount of transactions related to the remaining non-subprime trading assets at March 31, 2009 was $7.1 billion with a corresponding fair value exposure of $2.7 billion. The $7.1 billion notional amount of transactions comprised $2.1 billion primarily in interest-rate swaps with a corresponding fair value exposure of $10 million. The remaining notional amount of $5.0 billion was in the form of credit default swaps and total return swaps with a fair value of $2.7 billion.
The Company has purchased mortgage insurance from various monoline mortgage insurers on first mortgage loans. The notional amount of this insurance protection was approximately $316 million and $300 million as of June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively, with nominal pending claims against this notional amount.
In addition, Citigroup has indirect exposure to Monolines in various other parts of its businesses. Indirect exposure includes circumstances in which the Company is not a contractual counterparty to the Monolines, but instead owns securities which may benefit from embedded credit enhancements provided by a Monoline. For example, corporate or municipal bonds in the trading business may be insured by the Monolines. The previous table does not capture this type of indirect exposure to the Monolines.Primerica divestiture.
Highly Leveraged Financing Transactions
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)
Highly leveraged financing commitments are agreements that provide funding to a borrower with higher levels of debt (measured by
| Average Volume | Interest Revenue | % Average Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits with banks(5) | $ | 168,330 | $ | 166,378 | $ | 168,631 | $ | 291 | $ | 290 | $ | 377 | 0.69 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.90 | % | |||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 186,283 | $ | 160,033 | $ | 131,522 | $ | 452 | $ | 471 | $ | 515 | 0.97 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.57 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 83,055 | 78,052 | 61,382 | 329 | 281 | 279 | 1.59 | 1.46 | 1.82 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 269,338 | $ | 238,085 | $ | 192,904 | $ | 781 | $ | 752 | $ | 794 | 1.16 | % | 1.28 | % | 1.65 | % | |||||||||||
Trading account assets(7)(8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 130,475 | $ | 131,776 | $ | 134,334 | $ | 1,019 | $ | 1,069 | $ | 1,785 | 3.13 | % | 3.29 | % | 5.33 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 149,628 | 152,403 | 120,468 | 992 | 803 | 1,136 | 2.66 | 2.14 | 3.78 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 280,103 | $ | 284,179 | $ | 254,802 | $ | 2,011 | $ | 1,872 | $ | 2,921 | 2.88 | % | 2.67 | % | 4.60 | % | |||||||||||
Investments(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable | $ | 157,621 | $ | 150,858 | $ | 123,181 | $ | 1,301 | $ | 1,389 | $ | 1,674 | 3.31 | % | 3.73 | % | 5.45 | % | |||||||||||
Exempt from U.S. income tax | 15,305 | 15,570 | 16,293 | 197 | 173 | 247 | 5.16 | 4.51 | 6.08 | ||||||||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 138,477 | 144,892 | 118,891 | 1,488 | 1,547 | 1,514 | 4.31 | 4.33 | 5.11 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 311,403 | $ | 311,320 | $ | 258,365 | $ | 2,986 | $ | 3,109 | $ | 3,435 | 3.85 | % | 4.05 | % | 5.33 | % | |||||||||||
Loans (net of unearned income)(9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 460,147 | $ | 479,384 | $ | 385,347 | $ | 9,153 | $ | 9,511 | $ | 6,254 | 7.98 | % | 8.05 | % | 6.51 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 249,353 | 254,488 | 270,594 | 5,074 | 5,162 | 5,675 | 8.16 | 8.23 | 8.41 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 709,500 | $ | 733,872 | $ | 655,941 | $ | 14,227 | $ | 14,673 | $ | 11,929 | 8.04 | % | 8.11 | % | 7.29 | % | |||||||||||
Other interest-earning Assets | $ | 51,519 | $ | 45,894 | $ | 57,416 | $ | 122 | $ | 156 | $ | 215 | 0.95 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.50 | % | |||||||||||
Total interest-earning Assets | $ | 1,790,193 | $ | 1,779,728 | $ | 1,588,059 | $ | 20,418 | $ | 20,852 | $ | 19,671 | 4.57 | % | 4.75 | % | 4.97 | % | |||||||||||
Non-interest-earning assets(7) | 226,902 | 233,344 | 262,840 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets from discontinued operations | — | — | $ | 19,048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,017,095 | $ | 2,013,072 | $ | 1,869,947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
In these financings, debt service (that is, principal and interest payments) absorbs a significant portion of the cash flows generated by the borrower's business. Consequently, the risk that the borrower may not be able to meet its debt obligations is greater. Due to this risk, the interest rates and fees charged for this type of financing are generally higher than for other types of financing.
Prior to funding, highly leveraged financing commitments are assessed for impairment in accordance with SFAS 5 (ASC 450-20-25), and losses are recorded when they are probable and reasonably estimable. For the portion of loan commitments that relates to loans that will be held for investment, loss estimates are made basedtaxable equivalent adjustments (based on the borrower's ability to repayU.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $149 million, $135 million, and $82 million for the facility according to its contractual terms. Forsecond quarter of 2010, the portionfirst quarter of loan commitments that relates to loans that will be held-for-sale, loss estimates are made in reference to current conditions in the resale market (both interest rate risk2010, and credit risk are considered in the estimate). Loan origination, commitment, underwriting and other fees are netted against any recorded losses.
Citigroup generally manages the risk associated with highly leveraged financings it has entered into by seeking to sell a majority of its exposures to the market prior to or shortly after funding. In certain cases, all or a portion of a highly leveraged financing to be retained is hedged with credit derivatives or other hedging instruments. Thus, when a highly leveraged financing is funded, Citigroup records the resulting loan as follows:
Due to the dislocation of the credit markets and the reduced market interest in higher-risk/higher-yield instruments since the latter half of 2007, liquidity in the market for highly leveraged financings has been limited. This has resulted in the Company's recording pretax write-downs on funded and unfunded highly leveraged finance exposures of $237 million in the second quarter of 2009, bringingrespectively.
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)
| Average Volume | Interest Expense | % Average Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U. S. offices | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits(5) | $ | 186,070 | $ | 178,266 | $ | 173,168 | $ | 461 | $ | 458 | $ | 999 | 0.99 | % | 1.04 | % | 2.31 | % | |||||||||||
Other time deposits | 48,171 | 54,391 | 57,869 | 100 | 143 | 278 | 0.83 | 1.07 | 1.93 | ||||||||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 475,562 | 481,002 | 428,188 | 1,475 | 1,479 | 1,563 | 1.24 | 1.25 | 1.46 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 709,803 | $ | 713,659 | $ | 659,225 | $ | 2,036 | $ | 2,080 | $ | 2,840 | 1.15 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.73 | % | |||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 137,610 | $ | 120,695 | $ | 133,948 | $ | 237 | $ | 179 | $ | 288 | 0.69 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.86 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 100,759 | 79,447 | 74,346 | 560 | 475 | 643 | 2.23 | 2.42 | 3.47 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 238,369 | $ | 200,142 | $ | 208,294 | $ | 797 | $ | 654 | $ | 931 | 1.34 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.79 | % | |||||||||||
Trading account liabilities(8)(9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 39,709 | $ | 32,642 | $ | 19,592 | $ | 88 | $ | 44 | $ | 50 | 0.89 | % | 0.55 | % | 1.02 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 43,528 | 46,905 | 36,652 | 18 | 19 | 19 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 83,237 | $ | 79,547 | $ | 56,244 | $ | 106 | $ | 63 | $ | 69 | 0.51 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.49 | % | |||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 122,260 | $ | 152,785 | $ | 136,200 | $ | 181 | $ | 204 | $ | 209 | 0.59 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.62 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 33,630 | 27,659 | 35,299 | 34 | 72 | 106 | 0.41 | 1.06 | 1.20 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 155,890 | $ | 180,444 | $ | 171,499 | $ | 215 | $ | 276 | $ | 315 | 0.55 | % | 0.62 | % | 0.74 | % | |||||||||||
Long-term debt(10) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 391,524 | $ | 397,113 | $ | 296,324 | $ | 3,011 | $ | 3,005 | $ | 2,427 | 3.08 | % | 3.07 | % | 3.29 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 23,369 | 25,955 | 29,318 | 214 | 213 | �� | 260 | 3.67 | 3.33 | 3.56 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 414,893 | $ | 423,068 | $ | 325,642 | $ | 3,225 | $ | 3,218 | $ | 2,687 | 3.12 | % | 3.08 | % | 3.31 | % | |||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 1,602,192 | $ | 1,596,860 | $ | 1,420,904 | $ | 6,379 | $ | 6,291 | $ | 6,842 | 1.60 | % | 1.60 | % | 1.93 | % | |||||||||||
Demand deposits in U.S. offices | 14,986 | 16,675 | 19,584 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8) | 243,892 | 247,365 | 267,055 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities from discontinued operations | — | — | 12,122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 1,861,070 | $ | 1,860,900 | $ | 1,719,665 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Citigroup equity(11) | $ | 153,798 | $ | 149,993 | $ | 148,448 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling Interest | $ | 2,227 | $ | 2,179 | 1,834 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Equity | $ | 156,025 | $ | 152,172 | $ | 150,282 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 2,017,095 | $ | 2,013,072 | $ | 1,869,947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | 1,087,675 | $ | 1,080,673 | $ | 944,819 | 8,136 | $ | 8,660 | $ | 6,452 | 3.00 | % | 3.25 | % | 2.74 | % | |||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 702,518 | 699,055 | 643,240 | 5,903 | 5,901 | 6,377 | 3.37 | % | 3.42 | 3.98 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,790,193 | $ | 1,779,728 | $ | 1,588,059 | $ | 14,039 | $ | 14,561 | $ | 12,829 | 3.15 | % | 3.32 | % | 3.24 | % | |||||||||||
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)
| Average Volume | Interest Revenue | % Average Rate | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits with banks(5) | $ | 167,354 | $ | 168,887 | $ | 581 | $ | 813 | 0.70 | % | 0.97 | % | ||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 173,158 | $ | 129,763 | $ | 923 | $ | 1,065 | 1.07 | % | 1.66 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 80,554 | 56,907 | 610 | 614 | 1.53 | 2.18 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 253,712 | $ | 186,670 | $ | 1,533 | $ | 1,679 | 1.22 | % | 1.81 | % | ||||||||
Trading account assets(7)(8) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 131,126 | $ | 140,925 | $ | 2,088 | $ | 3,769 | 3.21 | % | 5.39 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 151,015 | 114,460 | 1,795 | 2,103 | 2.40 | 3.71 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 282,141 | $ | 255,385 | $ | 3,883 | $ | 5,872 | 2.78 | % | 4.64 | % | ||||||||
Investments(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | ||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable | $ | 154,239 | $ | 122,541 | $ | 2,690 | $ | 3,154 | 3.52 | % | 5.19 | % | ||||||||
Exempt from U.S. income tax | 15,438 | 15,434 | 370 | 365 | 4.83 | 4.77 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 141,685 | 112,921 | 3,035 | 3,092 | 4.32 | 5.52 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 311,362 | $ | 250,896 | $ | 6,095 | $ | 6,611 | 3.95 | % | 5.31 | % | ||||||||
Loans (net of unearned income)(9) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 469,765 | $ | 394,408 | $ | 18,663 | $ | 13,085 | 8.01 | % | 6.69 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 251,921 | 269,421 | 10,237 | 11,699 | 8.19 | 8.76 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 721,686 | $ | 663,829 | $ | 28,900 | $ | 24,784 | 8.08 | % | 7.53 | % | ||||||||
Other interest-earning assets | $ | 48,707 | $ | 54,524 | $ | 278 | $ | 495 | 1.15 | % | 1.83 | % | ||||||||
Total interest-earning assets | $ | 1,784,962 | $ | 1,580,191 | $ | 41,270 | $ | 40,254 | 4.66 | % | 5.14 | % | ||||||||
Non-interest-earning assets(7) | 230,122 | 289,207 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets from discontinued operations | — | 19,566 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,015,084 | $ | 1,888,964 | ||||||||||||||||
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
Citigroup's exposures to highly leveraged financing commitments totaled $8.5 billion at
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)
| Average Volume | Interest Expense | % Average Rate | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U. S. offices | ||||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits(5) | $ | 182,168 | $ | 169,073 | $ | 919 | $ | 1,632 | 1.02 | % | 1.95 | % | ||||||||
Other time deposits | 51,281 | 59,576 | 243 | 694 | 0.96 | 2.35 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 478,282 | 418,514 | 2,954 | 3,362 | 1.25 | 1.62 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 711,731 | $ | 647,163 | $ | 4,116 | $ | 5,688 | 1.17 | % | 1.77 | % | ||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 129,153 | $ | 143,102 | $ | 416 | $ | 604 | 0.65 | % | 0.85 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 90,103 | 71,265 | 1,035 | 1,431 | 2.32 | 4.05 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 219,256 | $ | 214,367 | $ | 1,451 | $ | 2,035 | 1.33 | % | 1.91 | % | ||||||||
Trading account liabilities(8)(9) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 36,176 | $ | 20,152 | $ | 132 | $ | 143 | 0.74 | % | 1.43 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 45,216 | 33,877 | 37 | 34 | 0.17 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 81,392 | $ | 54,029 | $ | 169 | $ | 177 | 0.42 | % | 0.66 | % | ||||||||
Short-term borrowings | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 137,522 | $ | 142,437 | $ | 385 | $ | 576 | 0.56 | % | 0.82 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 30,645 | 35,257 | 106 | 202 | 0.70 | 1.16 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 168,167 | $ | 177,694 | $ | 491 | $ | 778 | 0.59 | % | 0.88 | % | ||||||||
Long-term debt(10) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 394,318 | $ | 302,997 | $ | 6,016 | $ | 5,247 | 3.08 | % | 3.49 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 24,662 | 31,688 | 427 | 574 | 3.49 | 3.65 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 418,980 | $ | 334,685 | 6,443 | $ | 5,821 | 3.10 | % | 3.51 | % | |||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 1,599,526 | $ | 1,427,938 | 12,670 | $ | 14,499 | 1.60 | % | 2.05 | % | |||||||||
Demand deposits in U.S. offices | 15,831 | 17,486 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest bearing liabilities(8) | 245,629 | 283,835 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities from discontinued operations | — | 11,910 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 1,860,986 | $ | 1,741,169 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Citigroup equity(11) | $ | 151,895 | $ | 145,873 | ||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | 2,203 | 1,922 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Equity | $ | 154,098 | $ | 147,795 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 2,015,084 | $ | 1,888,964 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 1,084,175 | $ | 957,624 | $ | 16,796 | $ | 13,095 | 3.12 | % | 2.76 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 700,787 | 622,567 | 11,804 | 12,660 | 3.40 | % | 4.10 | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,784,962 | $ | 1,580,191 | $ | 28,600 | $ | 25,755 | 3.23 | % | 3.29 | % | ||||||||
In 2008, the Company completed the transfer of approximately $12.0 billion of loans to third parties, of which $8.5 billion relates to highly leveraged loan commitments. Inrespectively.
at fair value with changes recorded in
Principal Transactions. In addition, theReclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)
| 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | |||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | |||||||||||||
Deposits with banks(4) | $ | 3 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (85 | ) | $ | (86 | ) | |||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 71 | $ | (90 | ) | $ | (19 | ) | $ | 172 | $ | (235 | ) | $ | (63 | ) | |||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 19 | 29 | 48 | 89 | (39 | ) | 50 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 90 | $ | (61 | ) | $ | 29 | $ | 261 | $ | (274 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | ||||
Trading account assets(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (40 | ) | $ | (50 | ) | $ | (50 | ) | $ | (716 | ) | $ | (766 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (15 | ) | 204 | 189 | 238 | (382 | ) | (144 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | (25 | ) | $ | 164 | $ | 139 | $ | 188 | $ | (1,098 | ) | $ | (910 | ) | ||||
Investments(1) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 59 | $ | (123 | ) | $ | (64 | ) | $ | 394 | $ | (817 | ) | $ | (423 | ) | |||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (69 | ) | 10 | (59 | ) | 229 | (255 | ) | (26 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (113 | ) | $ | (123 | ) | $ | 623 | $ | (1,072 | ) | $ | (449 | ) | ||
Loans (net of unearned income)(6) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (383 | ) | $ | 25 | $ | (358 | ) | $ | 1,341 | $ | 1,558 | $ | 2,899 | |||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (104 | ) | 16 | (88 | ) | (436 | ) | (165 | ) | (601 | ) | ||||||||
Total | $ | (487 | ) | $ | 41 | $ | (446 | ) | 905 | $ | 1,393 | $ | 2,298 | ||||||
Other interest-earning assets | $ | 17 | $ | (51 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (20 | ) | $ | (73 | ) | $ | (93 | ) | ||
Total interest revenue | $ | (412 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | (434 | ) | $ | 1,956 | $ | (1,209 | ) | $ | 747 | |||
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)
| 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | |||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | |||||||||||||
Deposits | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 4 | $ | (44 | ) | $ | (40 | ) | $ | 17 | $ | (733 | ) | (716 | ) | ||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (17 | ) | 13 | (4 | ) | 162 | (250 | ) | (88 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | (13 | ) | $ | (31 | ) | $ | (44 | ) | $ | 179 | $ | (983 | ) | (804 | ) | |||
Federal funds purchased and | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 27 | $ | 31 | $ | 58 | $ | 8 | $ | (59 | ) | (51 | ) | ||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 120 | (35 | ) | 85 | 188 | (271 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 147 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 143 | $ | 196 | $ | (330 | ) | (134 | ) | |||||
Trading account liabilities(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 11 | $ | 33 | $ | 44 | $ | 45 | $ | (7 | ) | 38 | |||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (1 | ) | — | (1 | ) | 3 | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | 10 | $ | 33 | $ | 43 | $ | 48 | $ | (11 | ) | 37 | |||||||
Short-term borrowings | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (44 | ) | $ | 21 | $ | (23 | ) | $ | (21 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | (28 | ) | |||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 13 | (51 | ) | (38 | ) | (5 | ) | (67 | ) | (72 | ) | ||||||||
Total | $ | (31 | ) | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (61 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | $ | (74 | ) | (100 | ) | ||
Long-term debt | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (43 | ) | $ | 49 | $ | 6 | $ | 740 | $ | (156 | ) | 584 | ||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (22 | ) | 23 | 1 | (54 | ) | 8 | (46 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | (65 | ) | $ | 72 | $ | 7 | $ | 686 | $ | (148 | ) | 538 | ||||||
Total interest expense | $ | 48 | $ | 40 | $ | 88 | $ | 1,083 | $ | (1,546 | ) | (463 | ) | ||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | (460 | ) | $ | (62 | ) | $ | (522 | ) | $ | 873 | $ | 337 | 1,210 | |||||
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE, INTEREST EXPENSE, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)
| Six Months 2010 vs. Six Months 2009 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | ||||||||
In millions of dollars | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change(2) | |||||||
Deposits at interest with banks(4) | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (225 | ) | $ | (232 | ) | |
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 295 | $ | (437 | ) | $ | (142 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 211 | (215 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 506 | $ | (652 | ) | $ | (146 | ) | ||
Trading account assets(5) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (247 | ) | $ | (1,434 | ) | $ | (1,681 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 559 | (867 | ) | (308 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 312 | $ | (2,301 | ) | $ | (1,989 | ) | ||
Investments(1) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 704 | $ | (1,163 | ) | $ | (459 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 695 | (752 | ) | (57 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 1,399 | $ | (1,915 | ) | $ | (516 | ) | ||
Loans (net of unearned income)(6) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 2,743 | $ | 2,836 | $ | 5,579 | ||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (735 | ) | (727 | ) | (1,462 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | 2,008 | $ | 2,109 | $ | 4,117 | ||||
Other interest-earning assets | $ | (48 | ) | $ | (169 | ) | $ | (217 | ) | |
Total interest revenue | $ | 4,170 | $ | (3,153 | ) | $ | 1,017 | |||
Deposits | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 48 | $ | (1,212 | ) | $ | (1,164 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 438 | (846 | ) | (408 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 486 | $ | (2,058 | ) | $ | (1,572 | ) | ||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (55 | ) | $ | (133 | ) | $ | (188 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 317 | (712 | ) | (395 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 262 | $ | (845 | ) | $ | (583 | ) | ||
Trading account liabilities(5) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 79 | $ | (90 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 10 | (7 | ) | 3 | ||||||
Total | $ | 89 | $ | (97 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | ||
Short-term borrowings | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (19 | ) | $ | (172 | ) | $ | (191 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (24 | ) | (72 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | (43 | ) | $ | (244 | ) | $ | (287 | ) | |
Long-term debt | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 1,447 | $ | (678 | ) | $ | 769 | |||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (123 | ) | (24 | ) | (147 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | 1,324 | $ | (702 | ) | $ | 622 | |||
Total interest expense | $ | 2,118 | $ | (3,946 | ) | $ | (1,828 | ) | ||
Net interest revenue | $ | 2,052 | $ | 793 | $ | 2,845 | ||||
The table below shows all countries where total Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) cross-border outstandings exceed 0.75% of total Citigroup assets:
| Cross-Border Claims on Third Parties | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of U.S. dollars | Banks | Public | Private | Total | Trading and Short-Term Claims | Investments in and Funding of Local Franchises | Total Cross-Border Outstandings | Commitments | Total Cross-Border Outstandings | Commitments | |||||||||||||||||||||
France | $ | 10.8 | $ | 11.3 | $ | 12.1 | $ | 34.2 | $ | 26.0 | $ | 2.6 | $ | 36.8 | $ | 62.4 | $ | 33.0 | $ | 68.5 | |||||||||||
Germany | 13.7 | 6.5 | 6.1 | 26.3 | 21.9 | 6.8 | 33.1 | 62.8 | 30.2 | 53.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
India | 1.8 | 0.4 | 6.2 | 8.4 | 6.0 | 17.1 | 25.5 | 1.9 | 24.9 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cayman Islands | 0.3 | 0.7 | 20.6 | 21.6 | 20.9 | — | 21.6 | 4.7 | 18.0 | 6.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 10.9 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 19.9 | 17.8 | — | 19.9 | 142.5 | 17.1 | 138.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
South Korea | 1.7 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 11.4 | 16.4 | 15.1 | 17.4 | 14.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico | 2.0 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 6.9 | 4.4 | 8.4 | 15.3 | 21.7 | 12.8 | 21.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Netherlands | 4.6 | 2.7 | 8.0 | 15.3 | 9.7 | — | 15.3 | 45.2 | 20.3 | 65.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Italy | 1.1 | 9.4 | 2.4 | 12.9 | 11.2 | 0.9 | 13.8 | 16.4 | 21.7 | 21.2 |
Venezuelan Operations
In 2003, the Venezuelan government enacted currency restrictions that have restricted Citigroup's ability to obtain U.S. dollars in Venezuela at the official foreign currency rate. In May 2010, the government enacted new laws that have closed the parallel foreign exchange market and established a new foreign exchange market. Citigroup does not have access to U.S. dollars in this new market. Citigroup uses the official rate to re-measure the foreign currency transactions in the TRS is protected through margin agreements that provide for both initial margin and additional margin at specified triggers. Due to the initial cash margin received, the existing margin requirements on the TRS, and the substantive subordinate investments made by third parties, the Company believes that the transactions largely mitigate the Company's risk related to the transferred loans.
The Company's sole remaining exposure to the transferred loans are the senior debt securities,financial statements of its Venezuelan operations, which have an amortized cost basis of $6.7 billion and fair value of $6.3 billion atU.S. dollar functional currencies, into U.S. dollars. At June 30, 2009, and the receivables under the TRS, which have a fair value2010, Citigroup had net monetary assets in its Venezuelan operations denominated in bolivars of $0.4 billion at June 30, 2009. The change in the value of the retained senior debt securities that are classified as AFS securities are recorded in AOCI as they are deemed temporary. The offsetting change in the TRS are recorded as cash flow hedges within AOCI. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.approximately $200 million.
Presented below areSee Note 15 to the notionalConsolidated Financial Statements for a discussion and the mark-to-market receivables and payables fordisclosures related to Citigroup's derivative exposures as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
Notionals(1)
| Trading derivatives(2)(3) | Non-trading Derivatives(3) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | |||||||||||||||
Swaps | $ | 15,307,390 | $ | 15,096,293 | $ | 303,754 | $ | 306,501 | |||||||
Futures and forwards | 3,724,252 | 2,619,952 | 101,832 | 118,440 | |||||||||||
Written options | 3,063,580 | 2,963,280 | 18,850 | 20,255 | |||||||||||
Purchased options | 3,227,193 | 3,067,443 | 50,726 | 38,344 | |||||||||||
Total interest rate contract notionals | $ | 25,322,415 | $ | 23,746,968 | $ | 475,162 | $ | 483,540 | |||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | |||||||||||||||
Swaps | $ | 914,889 | $ | 882,327 | $ | 55,642 | $ | 62,491 | |||||||
Futures and forwards | 2,042,436 | 2,165,377 | 32,399 | 40,694 | |||||||||||
Written options | 435,498 | 483,036 | 6,473 | 3,286 | |||||||||||
Purchased options | 453,971 | 539,164 | 474 | 676 | |||||||||||
Total foreign exchange contract notionals | $ | 3,846,794 | $ | 4,069,904 | $ | 94,988 | $ | 107,147 | |||||||
Equity contracts | |||||||||||||||
Swaps | $ | 90,794 | $ | 98,315 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Futures and forwards | 13,557 | 17,390 | — | — | |||||||||||
Written options | 463,668 | 507,327 | — | — | |||||||||||
Purchased options | 442,601 | 471,532 | — | — | |||||||||||
Total equity contract notionals | $ | 1,010,620 | $ | 1,094,564 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Commodity and other contracts | |||||||||||||||
Swaps | $ | 27,451 | $ | 44,020 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Futures and forwards | 84,905 | 60,625 | — | — | |||||||||||
Written options | 30,663 | 31,395 | — | — | |||||||||||
Purchased options | 30,254 | 32,892 | — | — | |||||||||||
Total commodity and other contract notionals | $ | 173,273 | $ | 168,932 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Credit derivatives(4) | |||||||||||||||
Citigroup as the Guarantor: | |||||||||||||||
Credit default swaps | $ | 1,363,683 | $ | 1,441,117 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Total return swaps | 1,950 | 1,905 | — | — | |||||||||||
Credit default options | 55 | 258 | — | — | |||||||||||
Citigroup as the Beneficiary: | — | ||||||||||||||
Credit default swaps | 1,450,451 | 1,560,087 | — | — | |||||||||||
Total return swaps | 22,997 | 27,359 | 6,668 | 8,103 | |||||||||||
Credit default options | 150 | 135 | — | — | |||||||||||
Total credit derivatives | $ | 2,839,286 | $ | 3,030,861 | $ | 6,668 | $ | 8,103 | |||||||
Total derivative notionals | $ | 33,192,388 | $ | 32,111,229 | $ | 576,818 | $ | 598,790 | |||||||
See theactivities. The following page for footnotes to this table.
[Table continues on the following page.]
Mark-to-Market (MTM) Receivables/Payables
| Derivatives receivables—MTM | Derivatives payables—MTM | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||
Trading derivatives(2) | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 486,623 | $ | 667,597 | $ | 466,686 | $ | 654,178 | |||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 87,813 | 153,197 | 92,241 | 160,628 | |||||||||||
Equity contracts | 24,444 | 35,717 | 45,070 | 57,292 | |||||||||||
Commodity and other contracts | 21,331 | 23,924 | 20,447 | 22,473 | |||||||||||
Credit derivatives:(4) | |||||||||||||||
Citigroup as the Guarantor | 16,191 | 5,890 | 117,127 | 198,233 | |||||||||||
Citigroup as the Beneficiary | 134,467 | 222,461 | 16,217 | 5,476 | |||||||||||
Cash collateral paid/received | 55,356 | 63,866 | 51,227 | 65,010 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 826,225 | $ | 1,172,652 | $ | 809,015 | $ | 1,163,290 | |||||||
Less: Netting agreements and market value adjustments | (753,067 | ) | (1,057,363 | ) | (745,467 | ) | (1,046,505 | ) | |||||||
Net receivables/payables | $ | 73,158 | $ | 115,289 | $ | 63,548 | $ | 116,785 | |||||||
Non-trading derivatives | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 7,847 | $ | 14,755 | $ | 7,019 | $ | 7,742 | |||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 3,398 | 2,408 | 4,006 | 3,746 | |||||||||||
Credit Derivatives | 370 | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 11,615 | $ | 17,163 | $ | 11,025 | $ | 11,488 | |||||||
Fair Valuation Adjustments for DerivativesCapital Ratios
The fair value adjustments appliedCitigroup is subject to the risk-based capital guidelines issued by the Company to its derivative carrying values consistFederal Reserve Board. Historically, capital adequacy has been measured, in part, based on two risk-based capital ratios, the Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) ratios. Tier 1 Capital consists of the following items:
The Company's CVA methodology comprises two steps. First, the exposure profile for each counterparty is determined using the terms of all individual derivative positionsqualifying subordinated debt and a Monte Carlo simulation or other quantitative analysis to generate a series of expected cash flows at future points in time. The calculation of this exposure profile considers the effect of credit risk mitigants, including pledged cash or other collateral and any legal right of offset that exists with a counterparty through arrangements such as netting agreements. Individual derivative contracts that are subject to an enforceable master netting agreement with a counterparty are aggregated for this purpose, since it is those aggregate net cash flows that are subject to nonperformance risk. This process identifies specific, point in time future cash flows that are subject to nonperformance risk, rather than using the current recognized net asset or liability as a basis to measure the CVA. Second, market-based views of default probabilities derived from observed credit spreads in the credit default swap market, are applied to the expected future cash flows determined in step one. Own-credit CVA is determined using Citi-specific CDS spreads for the relevant tenor. Generally, counterparty CVA is determined using CDS spread indices for each credit rating and tenor. For certain identified facilities where individual analysis is practicable (for example, exposures to monoline counterparties) counterparty-specific CDS spreads are used.
The CVA adjustment is designed to incorporate a market view of the credit risk inherent in the derivative portfolio as required by SFAS 157 (ASC 820-10). However, most derivative instruments are negotiated bilateral contracts and are not commonly transferred to third parties. Derivative instruments are normally settled contractually, or if terminated early, are terminated at a value negotiated bilaterally between the counterparties. Therefore, the CVA (both counterparty and own-credit) may not be realized upon a settlement or termination in the normal course of business. In addition, all or alimited portion of the allowance for credit valuation adjustments may be reversed or otherwise adjusted in future periods inlosses. Both measures of capital adequacy are stated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets.
In 2009, the eventU.S. banking regulators developed a new measure of changes incapital termed "Tier 1 Common," which is defined as Tier 1 Capital less non-common elements, including qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests, and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts. Tier 1 Common and related capital adequacy ratios are measures used and relied upon by U.S. banking regulators; however, they are non-GAAP financial measures for SEC purposes. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.
Citigroup's risk-weighted assets are principally derived from application of the risk-based capital guidelines related to the measurement of credit risk. Pursuant to these guidelines, on-balance-sheet assets and the credit riskequivalent amount of Citi or its counterparties, or changes incertain off-balance-sheet exposures (such as financial guarantees, unfunded lending commitments, letters of credit, and derivatives) are assigned to one of several prescribed risk-weight categories based upon the perceived credit mitigants (collateral and netting agreements)risk associated with the derivative instruments. Historically,obligor, or if relevant, the guarantor, the nature of the collateral, or external credit ratings. Risk-weighted assets also incorporate a measure for market risk on covered trading account positions and all foreign exchange and commodity positions whether or not carried in the trading account. Excluded from risk-weighted assets are any assets, such as goodwill and deferred tax assets, to the extent required to be deducted from regulatory capital. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.
Citigroup is also subject to a Leverage ratio requirement, a non-risk-based measure of capital adequacy, which is defined as Tier 1 Capital as a percentage of quarterly adjusted average total assets.
To be "well capitalized" under current federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a bank holding company must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital ratio of at least 10%, and a Leverage ratio of at least 3%, and not be subject to a Federal Reserve Board directive to maintain higher capital levels. The following table sets forth Citigroup's credit spreads have moved in tandemregulatory capital ratios as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Citigroup Regulatory Capital Ratios
| Jun. 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Common | 9.71 | % | 9.60 | % | |||
Tier 1 Capital | 11.99 | 11.67 | |||||
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) | 15.59 | 15.25 | |||||
Leverage | 6.31 | 6.87 | |||||
As noted in the table above, Citigroup was "well capitalized" under the federal bank regulatory agency definitions as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Common | ||||||||
Citigroup common stockholders' equity | $ | 154,494 | $ | 152,388 | ||||
Less: Net unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale, net of tax(1) | (2,259 | ) | (4,347 | ) | ||||
Less: Accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax | (3,184 | ) | (3,182 | ) | ||||
Less: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax(2) | (3,465 | ) | (3,461 | ) | ||||
Less: Cumulative effect included in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to the change in own credit worthiness, net of tax(3) | 973 | 760 | ||||||
Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets(4) | 31,493 | 26,044 | ||||||
Less: Intangible assets: | ||||||||
Goodwill | 25,213 | 25,392 | ||||||
Other disallowed intangible assets | 5,393 | 5,899 | ||||||
Other | (776 | ) | (788 | ) | ||||
Total Tier 1 Common | $ | 99,554 | $ | 104,495 | ||||
Qualifying perpetual preferred stock | $ | 312 | $ | 312 | ||||
Qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts | 20,091 | 19,217 | ||||||
Qualifying noncontrolling interests | 1,077 | 1,135 | ||||||
Other | 1,875 | 1,875 | ||||||
Total Tier 1 Capital | $ | 122,909 | $ | 127,034 | ||||
Tier 2 Capital | ||||||||
Allowance for credit losses(5) | $ | 13,275 | $ | 13,934 | ||||
Qualifying subordinated debt(6) | 22,825 | 24,242 | ||||||
Net unrealized pretax gains on available-for-sale equity securities(1) | 743 | 773 | ||||||
Total Tier 2 Capital | $ | 36,843 | $ | 38,949 | ||||
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital) | $ | 159,752 | $ | 165,983 | ||||
Risk-weighted assets(7) | $ | 1,024,929 | $ | 1,088,526 | ||||
Adoption of SFAS 166/167 Impact on Capital
The adoption of SFAS 166/167 had a significant and immediate impact on Citigroup's capital ratios as of January 1, 2010.
As described further in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the adoption of SFAS 166/167 resulted in the consolidation of $137 billion of incremental assets and $146 billion of liabilities onto Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet, including securitized credit card receivables on the date of adoption, January 1, 2010. The adoption of SFAS 166/167 also resulted in a net increase of $10 billion in risk-weighted assets. In addition, Citi added $13.4 billion to the loan loss allowance, increased deferred tax assets by $5.0 billion, and reduced retained earnings by $8.4 billion. This translated into a reduction in Tangible Common Equity of $8.4 billion, and a decrease in Tier 1 Common, Tier 1 Capital, and Total Capital of $14.2 billion, $14.2 billion and $14.0 billion, respectively, which were partially offset by net income of $4.4 billion and $2.3 billion of qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts issued during the first quarter of 2009,2010.
The impact on Citigroup's credit spreads widenedcapital ratios from the January 1, 2010 adoption of SFAS 166/167 was as follows:
As of January 1, 2010 | Impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Common | (138 | ) bps | ||
Tier 1 Capital | (141 | ) bps | ||
Total Capital | (142 | ) bps | ||
Leverage | (118 | ) bps | ||
TCE (TCE/RWA) | (87 | ) bps |
For more information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements below.
Common Stockholders' Equity
Citigroup's common stockholders' equity increased during the six months ended June 30, 2010 by $2.1 billion to $154.5 billion, and counterparty credit spreads generally narrowed, eachrepresented 8.0% of total assets as of June 30, 2010. Citigroup's common stockholders' equity was $152.4 billion, which positively affected revenues.represented 8.2% of total assets, at December 31, 2009.
The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses)the change in Citigroup's common stockholders' equity during the first six months of 2010:
In billions of dollars | | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Common stockholders' equity, December 31, 2009 | $ | 152.4 | ||
Transition adjustment to retained earnings associated with the adoption of SFAS 166/167 (as of January 1, 2010) | (8.4 | ) | ||
Net income | 7.1 | |||
Employee benefit plans and other activities | 1.7 | |||
ADIA Upper DECs equity units purchase contract | 1.9 | |||
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (0.2 | ) | ||
Common stockholders' equity, June 30, 2010 | $ | 154.5 | ||
As of June 30, 2010, $6.7 billion of stock repurchases remained under Citi's authorized repurchase programs. No material repurchases were made in the first six months of 2010, or the year ended December 31, 2009. For so long as the U.S. government holds any Citigroup common stock or trust preferred securities, Citigroup has generally agreed not to acquire, repurchase or redeem any Citigroup equity or trust preferred securities, other than pursuant to administering its employee benefit plans or other customary exceptions, or with the consent of the U.S. government.
Tangible Common Equity (TCE)
TCE, as defined by Citigroup, representsCommon equity lessGoodwill andIntangible assets (other than Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs)), net of the related net deferred taxes. Other companies may calculate TCE in a manner different from that of Citigroup. Citi's TCE was $121.3 billion at June 30, 2010 and $118.2 billion at December 31, 2009.
The TCE ratio (TCE divided by risk-weighted assets) was 11.8% at June 30, 2010 and 10.9% at December 31, 2009.
TCE is a capital adequacy metric used and relied upon by industry analysts; however, it is a non-GAAP financial measure for SEC purposes. A reconciliation of Citigroup's total stockholders' equity to TCE follows:
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Citigroup stockholders' equity | $ | 154,806 | $ | 152,700 | |||||
Less: | |||||||||
Preferred stock | 312 | 312 | |||||||
Common equity | $ | 154,494 | $ | 152,388 | |||||
Less: | |||||||||
Goodwill | 25,201 | 25,392 | |||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs) | 7,868 | 8,714 | |||||||
Goodwill-recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets | 12 | — | |||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs)— recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets | 54 | — | |||||||
Related net deferred tax assets | 62 | 68 | |||||||
Tangible common equity (TCE) | $ | 121,297 | $ | 118,214 | |||||
Tangible assets | |||||||||
GAAP assets | $ | 1,937,656 | $ | 1,856,646 | |||||
Less: | |||||||||
Goodwill | 25,201 | 25,392 | |||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs) | 7,868 | 8,714 | |||||||
Goodwill-recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets | 12 | — | |||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs)— recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets | 54 | — | |||||||
Related deferred tax assets | 365 | 386 | |||||||
Federal bank regulatory reclassification | — | 5,746 | |||||||
Tangible assets (TA) | $ | 1,904,156 | $ | 1,827,900 | |||||
Risk-weighted assets (RWA) | $ | 1,024,929 | $ | 1,088,526 | |||||
TCE/TA ratio | 6.37 | % | 6.47 | % | |||||
TCE/RWA ratio | 11.83 | % | 10.86 | % | |||||
Capital Resources of Citigroup's Depository Institutions
Citigroup's U.S. subsidiary depository institutions are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board. To be "well capitalized" under current regulatory definitions, Citigroup's depository institutions must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) ratio of at least 10%, and a Leverage ratio of at least 5%, and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels.
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, all of Citigroup's U.S. subsidiary depository institutions were "well capitalized" under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, including Citigroup's primary depository institution, Citibank, N.A., as noted in the following table:
Citibank, N.A. Components of Capital and Ratios Under Regulatory Guidelines
In billions of dollars | Jun. 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Capital | $ | 101.1 | $ | 96.8 | |||
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) | 114.6 | 110.6 | |||||
Tier 1 Capital ratio | 14.16 | % | 13.16 | % | |||
Total Capital ratio | 16.04 | 15.03 | |||||
Leverage ratio(1) | 8.90 | 8.31 | |||||
Similar to pending changes to capital standards applicable to Citigroup and its broker-dealer subsidiaries, as discussed below, the capital requirements applicable to Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions may be subject to change in light of actions currently being considered at both the legislative and regulatory levels.
There are various legal and regulatory limitations on the ability of Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions to pay dividends, extend credit or otherwise supply funds to Citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries. In determining the declaration of dividends, each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and Leverage ratio requirements, as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Citigroup did not receive any dividends from its bank subsidiaries during the first six months of 2010.
The following table presents the estimated sensitivity of Citigroup's and Citibank, N.A.'s capital ratios to changes of $100 million in Tier 1 Common, Tier 1 Capital, or Total Capital (numerator), or changes of $1 billion in risk-weighted assets or adjusted average total assets (denominator) based on financial information as of June 30, 2010. This information is provided for the purpose of analyzing the impact that a change in Citigroup's or Citibank, N.A.'s financial position or results of operations could have on these ratios. These sensitivities only consider a single change to either a component of capital, risk-weighted assets, or adjusted average total assets. Accordingly, an event that affects more than one factor may have a larger basis point impact than is reflected in this table.
Tier 1 Common ratio | Tier 1 Capital ratio | Total Capital ratio | Leverage ratio | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Impact of $100 million change in Tier 1 Common | Impact of $1 billion change in risk-weighted assets | Impact of $100 million change in Tier 1 Capital | Impact of $1 billion change in risk-weighted assets | Impact of $100 million change in Total Capital | Impact of $1 billion change in risk-weighted assets | Impact of $100 million change in Tier 1 Capital | Impact of $1 billion change in adjusted average total assets | ||||||||||||||||||
Citigroup | 1.0 bps | 0.9 bps | 1.0 bps | 1.2 bps | 1.0 bps | 1.5bps | 0.5 bps | 0.3 bps | |||||||||||||||||
Citibank, N.A. | — | — | 1.4 bps | 2.0 bps | 1.4 bps | 2.2 bps | 0.9 bps | 0.8 bps | |||||||||||||||||
Broker-Dealer Subsidiaries
At June 30, 2010, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., a broker-dealer registered with the SEC that is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), had net capital, computed in accordance with the SEC's net capital rule, of $8.3 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement by $7.6 billion.
In addition, certain of Citi's broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to regulation in the other countries in which they do business, including requirements to maintain specified levels of net capital or its equivalent. Citigroup's broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with their capital requirements at June 30, 2010.
Similar to pending changes to capital standards applicable to Citigroup, as discussed under "Regulatory Capital Standards Developments" below, net capital requirements applicable to Citigroup's broker-dealer subsidiaries in the U.S. and other jurisdictions may be subject to change in light of the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Financial Reform Act) and other actions currently being considered at both the legislative and regulatory levels. Citi continues to monitor these developments closely.
Regulatory Capital Standards Developments
The prospective regulatory capital standards for financial institutions are currently subject to significant debate, rulemaking activity and uncertainty, both in the U.S. as well as internationally. Citi continues to monitor these developments closely.
Basel II and III. In late 2005, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee) published a new set of risk-based capital standards (Basel II) which would permit banks, including Citigroup, to leverage internal risk models used to measure credit, operational, and market risk exposures to drive regulatory capital calculations. In late 2007, the U.S. banking regulators adopted these standards for large banks, including Citigroup. As adopted, the standards require Citigroup, as a large and internationally active bank, to comply with the most advanced Basel II approaches for calculating credit and operational risk capital requirements, which could result in a need for Citigroup to hold additional regulatory capital. The U.S. implementation timetable consists of a parallel calculation period under the current regulatory capital regime (Basel I) and Basel II followed by a three-year transitional period.
Citi began parallel reporting on April 1, 2010. There will be at least four quarters of parallel reporting before Citi enters the three-year transitional period. U.S. regulators have reserved the right to change how Basel II is applied in the U.S. following a review at the end of the second year of the transitional period, and to retain the existing prompt corrective action and leverage capital requirements applicable to banking organizations in the U.S. Citigroup intends to implement Basel II within the timeframe required by the U.S. regulators.
Separate from the Basel II rules for credit and operational risk discussed above, the Basel Committee has proposed revisions to the market risk framework that could also lead to additional capital requirements (Basel III). Although not yet ratified by the Basel Committee or U.S. regulators, the Basel III final rules for capital, leverage and liquidity (Basel III introduces new global standards and ratios for liquidity risk measurement) are currently expected to be published by January 2011, one quarter ahead of Citigroup's earliest date for Basel II implementation for credit and operational risk.
Financial Reform Act. In addition to the implementation of Basel II and Basel III, the Financial Reform Act grants new regulatory authority to various U.S. federal regulators, including the Federal Reserve Board and a newly created Financial Stability Oversight Council (Oversight Council), to impose heightened prudential standards on financial institutions such as Citigroup. These standards could include heightened capital, leverage and liquidity standards, as well as requirements for periodic stress tests. The Federal Reserve Board will also have discretion to impose other prudential standards, including contingent capital requirements, and will retain important flexibility to distinguish among bank holding companies such as Citigroup based on their perceived riskiness, complexity, activities, size and other factors.
In addition, the so-called "Collins Amendment" to the Financial Reform Act will result in new minimum capital requirements for bank holding companies such as Citigroup, and could require Citigroup to replace certain of its outstanding securities that are currently counted towards Citi's Tier 1 Capital requirements, such as trust preferred securities, over a period of time.
General
Citigroup's cash flows and liquidity needs are primarily generated within its operating subsidiaries. Exceptions exist for major corporate items, such as equity and certain long-term debt issuances, which take place at the Citigroup corporate level. Generally, Citi's management of funding and liquidity is designed to optimize availability of funds as needed within Citi's legal and regulatory structure. Due to various constraints that limit certain Citi subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or otherwise make funds available (see "Parameters for Intercompany Funding Transfers" below), Citigroup's primary objectives for funding and liquidity management are established by entity and in aggregate across: (i) the parent holding company/broker dealer subsidiaries; and (ii) bank subsidiaries.
Currently, Citigroup's primary sources of funding include deposits, long-term debt and long-term collateralized financing, and equity, including preferred, trust preferred securities and common stock. This funding is supplemented by modest amounts of short-term borrowings.
Citi views its deposit base as its most stable and lowest cost funding source. Citi has focused on maintaining a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base that stood at approximately $814 billion as of June 30, 2010, as compared with $828 billion at March 31, 2010 and $836 billion at December 31, 2009. The sequential decline in deposits primarily resulted from FX translation. Excluding FX translation, Citigroup deposits at June 30, 2010 remained flat as compared with the first quarter of 2010. As stated above, Citigroup's deposits are diversified across products and regions, with approximately 63% outside of the U.S.
At June 30, 2010, long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for Citigroup, Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI) and other Citigroup subsidiaries, collectively, were as follows:
In billions of dollars | Citigroup Parent Company | Other Non-bank | Bank | Total Citigroup(1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Long-term debt(2) | $ | 189.1 | $ | 75.7 | $ | 148.5 | (3) | $ | 413.3 | ||||
Commercial paper | — | 11.2 | 25.2 | 36.4 |
The $36.4 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of June 30, 2010 reflects the consolidation of VIEs pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 effective January 1, 2010; the $10.2 billion at December 31, 2009 was pre-adoption. The VIE consolidation led to an increase in bank subsidiary commercial paper, while non-bank subsidiarycommercial paper remained at recent levels.
The table below details the long-term debt issuances of Citigroup during the past five quarters.
In billions of dollars | 2Q09 | 3Q09 | 4Q09 | 1Q10 | 2Q10 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Debt issued under TLGP guarantee | $ | 17.0 | $ | 10.0 | $ | 10.0 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Debt issued without TLGP guarantee: | |||||||||||||||||
Citigroup parent company/CFI | 7.4 | 12.6 | 4.0 | (3) | 1.3 | 5.0 | (3) | ||||||||||
Other Citigroup subsidiaries | 10.1 | (1) | 7.9 | (2) | 5.8 | (4) | 3.7 | (5) | 0.1 | ||||||||
Total(6) | $ | 34.5 | $ | 30.5 | $ | 19.8 | $ | 5.0 | $ | 5.1 | |||||||
See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail on Citigroup's and its affiliates' long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding.
Structural liquidity, defined as the sum of deposits, long-term debt and stockholders' equity as a percentage of total assets, was 71% at June 30, 2010, unchanged as compared with March 31, 2010 and compared with 67% at June 30, 2009.
In addition, one of Citi's key structural liquidity measures is the cash capital ratio. Cash capital is a broader measure of the ability to fund the structurally illiquid portion of Citigroup's balance sheet than traditional measures, such as deposits to loans or core deposits to loans. Cash capital measures the amount of long-term funding (>1 year) available to fund illiquid assets. Long-term funding includes core customer deposits, long-term debt and equity. Illiquid assets include loans (net of liquidity adjustments), illiquid securities, securities haircuts and other assets (i.e., goodwill, intangibles, fixed assets, receivables, etc.). At June 30, 2010, the combined Citigroup, the parent holding company, and CGMHI, as well as the aggregate bank subsidiaries had an excess of cash capital. In addition, as of June 30, 2010, the combined Citigroup, the parent holding company, and CGMHI maintained liquidity to meet all maturing obligations significantly in excess of a one-year period without access to the unsecured wholesale markets.
Aggregate Liquidity Resources
| Parent & Broker Dealer | Significant Bank Entities | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Jun. 30, 2010 | Mar. 31, 2010 | Jun. 30, 2009 | Jun. 30, 2010 | Mar. 31, 2010 | Jun. 30, 2009 | Jun. 30, 2010 | Mar. 31, 2010 | Jun. 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash at major central banks | $ | 24.7 | $ | 9.5 | $ | 22.5 | $ | 86.0 | $ | 108.9 | $ | 110.0 | $ | 110.7 | $ | 118.4 | $ | 132.5 | ||||||||||
Unencumbered Liquid Securities | 56.8 | 72.8 | 42.5 | 143.4 | 128.7 | 53.3 | 200.2 | 201.5 | 95.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 81.5 | $ | 82.3 | $ | 65.0 | $ | 229.4 | $ | 237.6 | $ | 163.3 | $ | 310.9 | $ | 319.9 | $ | 228.3 | ||||||||||
As noted in the table above, Citigroup's aggregate liquidity resources totaled $310.9 billion as of June 30, 2010, compared with $319.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $228.3 billion at June 30, 2009. Excluding the impact of FX translation, the level of liquidity resources at June 30, 2010 was essentially flat to the prior quarter. These amounts are as of quarter-end, and may increase or decrease intra-quarter and intra-day in the ordinary course of business.
As of June 30, 2010, Citigroup's and its affiliates' liquidity portfolio and broker-dealer "cash box" totaled $81.5 billion, compared with $82.3 billion at March 31, 2010 and $65.0 billion at June 30, 2009. This includes the liquidity portfolio and cash box held in the U.S. as well as government bonds held by Citigroup's broker-dealer entities in the United Kingdom and Japan. Citigroup's bank subsidiaries had an aggregate of approximately $86 billion of cash on deposit with major central banks (including the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the European Central Bank, Bank of England, Swiss National Bank, Bank of Japan, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority), compared with approximately $108.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $110.0 billion at June 30, 2009. These amounts are in addition to cash deposited from the broker-dealer "cash box" noted above.
Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also have significant additional liquidity resources through unencumbered highly liquid securities available for secured funding through private markets or that are, or could be, pledged to the major central banks and the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks. The value of these liquid securities was $143.4 billion at June 30, 2010, compared with $128.7 billion at March 31, 2010 and $53.3 billion at June 30, 2009. Significant amounts of cash and liquid securities are also available in other Citigroup entities.
In addition to the highly liquid securities listed above, Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also maintain additional unencumbered securities and loans which are currently pledged to the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks and U.S. Federal Reserve Banks.
Further, Citigroup, as the parent holding company, can transfer funding, subject to certain legal restrictions, to other affiliated entities, including its bank subsidiaries. Citi's non-bank subsidiaries, such as its broker-dealer subsidiaries, can also transfer excess liquidity to the parent holding company through termination of intercompany borrowings, and to the parent holding company and other affiliates, including Citi's bank subsidiaries. In addition, Citigroup's bank subsidiaries, including Citibank, N.A., can lend to Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. As of June 30, 2010, the amount available for lending under Section 23A was approximately $26 billion, provided the funds are collateralized appropriately.
Funding Outlook
Based on the current status of Citi's aggregate liquidity resources discussed above, as well as Citi's continued deleveraging, stability in its deposit base to date, and its increased structural liquidity over the prior two years, Citi currently expects to refinance only a portion of its long-term debt maturing in 2010. In addition, Citi does not currently expect to refinance its TLGP debt as it matures (as set forth in note 2 of the long-term debt above). However, as part of its efforts to maintain and solidify its structural liquidity, as well as extend the duration of liabilities supporting its businesses, for the full year of 2010, Citi currently expects to issue approximately $18 billion to $21 billion in long-term debt (excluding local country debt) an amount that is $3 billion to $6 billion higher than previously-stated estimates. This $18 billion to $21 billion of expected issuance is less than the $35 billion of expected maturities during the year (excluding local country debt). Citi continues to review its funding and liquidity needs and may adjust its expected issuances for the remainder of 2010 due to market conditions or regulatory requirements, among other factors.
Credit Ratings
Citigroup's ability to access the capital markets and other sources of funds, as well as the cost of these funds and its ability to maintain certain deposits, is dependent on its credit ratings. The table below indicates the current ratings for Citigroup. As a result of the Citigroup guarantee, changes in CVAsratings for Citigroup Funding Inc. are the same as those of Citigroup.
Citigroup's Debt Ratings as of June 30, 2010
Citigroup Inc. | Citigroup Funding Inc. | Citibank, N.A. | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Senior debt | Commercial paper | Senior debt | Commercial paper | Long- term | Short- term | |||||||
Fitch Ratings | A+ | F1+ | A+ | F1+ | A+ | F1+ | ||||||
Moody's Investors Service | A3 | P-1 | A3 | P-1 | A1 | P-1 | ||||||
Standard & Poor's (S&P) | A | A-1 | A | A-1 | A+ | A-1 | ||||||
The credit rating agencies included in the chart above have each indicated that they are evaluating the impact of the Financial Reform Act on the rating support assumptions currently included in their methodologies as related to large bank holding companies. These evaluations are generally as a result of agencies' belief that the Financial Reform Act increases the uncertainty regarding the U.S. government's willingness to provide extraordinary support to such companies. Consistent with such belief and to bring Citi in line with other large banks, S&P and Moody's revised their outlooks on Citigroup's supported ratings from stable to negative in February and July of 2010, respectively. The credit rating agencies have generally indicated that their evaluations of the impact of the Financial Reform Act could take anywhere from several months to two years. The ultimate timing of the completion of the evaluations, as well as the outcomes, is uncertain.
Ratings downgrades by Fitch Ratings, Moody's Investors Service or Standard & Poor's could have material impacts on funding and liquidity through cash obligations, reduced funding capacity and due to collateral triggers. Because of the current credit ratings of Citigroup Inc., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating may or may not impact Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating by one notch. As of June 30, 2010, Citi currently believes that a one-notch downgrade of both the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc. and a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating could result in the assumed loss of unsecured commercial paper ($10.6 billion) and tender option bonds funding ($1.9 billion) as well as derivative instrumentstriggers and additional margin requirements ($1.0 billion).
Additionally, other funding sources, such as repurchase agreements and other margin requirements for which there are no explicit triggers, could be adversely affected. The aggregate liquidity resources of Citigroup's parent holding company and broker-dealer stood at $83.6 billion as of June 30, 2010, in part as a contingency for such an event, and a broad range of mitigating actions are currently included in the Citigroup Contingency Funding Plan. These mitigating factors include, but are not limited to, accessing funding capacity from existing clients, diversifying funding sources, adjusting the size of select trading books, and tailoring levels of reverse repurchase agreement lending.
Citi currently believes that a more severe ratings downgrade scenario, such as a two-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc., accompanied by a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating, could result in an additional $1.6 billion in funding requirement in the form of cash obligations and collateral.
Further, as of June 30, 2010, a one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term ratings of Citibank, N.A. could result in an approximate $3.6 billion funding requirement in the form of collateral and cash obligations. Because of the current credit ratings of Citibank, N.A., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating is unlikely to have any impact on its commercial paper/short-term rating. The significant bank entities, Citibank, N.A., and other bank vehicles have aggregate liquidity resources of $229 billion, and have a detailed contingency funding plan that encompasses a broad range of mitigating actions.
OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance-sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs), primarily in connection with securitization activities inRegional Consumer Banking andInstitutional Clients Group. Citigroup and its subsidiaries use SPEs principally to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroup's financial assets, assisting clients in securitizing their financial assets and creating investment products for clients. The adoption of SFAS 166/167, effective on January 1, 2010, caused certain SPEs, including credit card receivables securitization trusts and asset-backed commercial paper conduits, to be consolidated in Citi's Financial Statements. For further information on Citi's securitization activities and involvement in SPEs, see Notes 1 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Citigroup's risk management framework balances strong corporate oversight with well-defined independent risk management functions for each business and region, as well as cross-business product expertise. The Citigroup risk management framework is described in Citigroup's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
During the second quarter of 2010, Citigroup's aggregate loan portfolio decreased by $29.6 billion to $692.2 billion. Citi's total allowance for loan losses totaled $46.2 billion at June 30, 2010, a coverage ratio of 6.72% of total loans, down from 6.80% at March 31, 2010 and up from 5.60% in the second quarter of 2009.
During the second quarter of 2010, Citigroup recorded a net release of $1.5 billion to its credit reserves and allowance for unfunded lending commitments, compared to a $3.9 billion build in the second quarter of 2009. The release consisted of a net release of $683 million for corporate loans ($253 million release inICG and approximately $400 million release inSAP), and a net release of $827 million for consumer loans, mainly for Retail Partner Cards in Citi Holdings,LATAM RCB andAsia RCB (mainly a $412 million release inRCB and a $421 million release inLCL). Despite the reserve release for consumer loans, the coincident months of coverage of the consumer portfolio increased from 15.5 to 15.9 months, significantly higher than the year-ago level of 12.7 months.
Net credit losses of $8.0 billion during the second quarter of 2010 decreased $3.5 billion from year-ago levels (on a managed basis). The decrease consisted of a net decrease of $2.2 billion for consumer loans (mainly a $1.9 billion decrease inLCL and a $321 million decrease inRCB) and a decrease of $1.3 billion for corporate loans ($1.2 billion decrease inSAP and a $126 million decrease inICG).
Consumer non-accrual loans (which excludes credit card receivables) totaled $13.8 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $15.6 billion at March 31, 2010 and $15.8 billion at June 30, 2009. The consumer loan 90 days or more delinquency rate was 3.67% at June 30, 2010, compared to 4.01% at March 31, 2010 and 3.68% a year ago. The 30 to 89 days past due consumer loan delinquency rate was 3.06% at June 30, 2010, compared to 3.19% at March 31, 2010 and 3.41% a year ago. During the second quarter of 2010, both early- and later-stage delinquencies declined across most of the consumer loan portfolios, driven by improvement in North America mortgages. Delinquencies declined in first mortgages, entirely as a result of asset sales and loans moving from the trial period under the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to permanent modification.
Corporate non-accrual loans were $11.0 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $12.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $12.5 billion a year ago. The decrease from the prior quarter was mainly due to loan sales, write-offs and paydowns, which were partially offset by increases due to weakening of certain borrowers.
See below for a discussion of Citi's loan and credit accounting policies.
In millions of dollars at year end | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Consumer loans | |||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage and real estate(1) | $ | 171,102 | $ | 180,334 | $ | 183,842 | $ | 191,748 | $ | 197,358 | |||||||
Installment, revolving credit, and other | 61,867 | 69,111 | 58,099 | 57,820 | 61,645 | ||||||||||||
Cards | 125,337 | 127,818 | 28,951 | 36,039 | 33,750 | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 5,540 | 5,386 | 5,640 | 5,848 | 6,016 | ||||||||||||
Lease financing | 6 | 7 | 11 | 15 | 16 | ||||||||||||
$ | 363,852 | $ | 382,656 | $ | 276,543 | $ | 291,470 | $ | 298,785 | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage and real estate (1) | $ | 47,921 | $ | 49,421 | $ | 47,297 | $ | 47,568 | $ | 45,986 | |||||||
Installment, revolving credit, and other | 38,115 | 44,541 | 42,805 | 45,004 | 45,556 | ||||||||||||
Cards | 37,510 | 38,191 | 41,493 | 41,443 | 42,262 | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 16,420 | 14,828 | 14,780 | 14,858 | 13,858 | ||||||||||||
Lease financing | 677 | 771 | 331 | 345 | 339 | ||||||||||||
$ | 140,643 | $ | 147,752 | $ | 146,706 | $ | 149,218 | $ | 148,001 | ||||||||
Total consumer loans | $ | 504,495 | $ | 530,408 | $ | 423,249 | $ | 440,688 | $ | 446,786 | |||||||
Unearned income | 951 | 1,061 | 808 | 803 | 866 | ||||||||||||
Consumer loans, net of unearned income | $ | 505,446 | $ | 531,469 | $ | 424,057 | $ | 441,491 | $ | 447,652 | |||||||
Corporate loans | |||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 11,656 | $ | 15,558 | $ | 15,614 | $ | 19,692 | $ | 26,125 | |||||||
Loans to financial institutions | 31,450 | 31,279 | 6,947 | 7,666 | 8,181 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage and real estate (1) | 22,453 | 21,283 | 22,560 | 23,221 | 23,862 | ||||||||||||
Installment, revolving credit, and other | 14,812 | 15,792 | 17,737 | 17,734 | 19,856 | ||||||||||||
Lease financing | 1,244 | 1,239 | 1,297 | 1,275 | 1,284 | ||||||||||||
$ | 81,615 | $ | 85,151 | $ | 64,155 | $ | 69,588 | $ | 79,308 | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 65,615 | $ | 64,903 | $ | 68,467 | $ | 73,564 | $ | 78,512 | |||||||
Installment, revolving credit, and other | 11,174 | 10,956 | 9,683 | 10,949 | 11,638 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage and real estate (1) | 7,301 | 9,771 | 9,779 | 12,023 | 11,887 | ||||||||||||
Loans to financial institutions | 20,646 | 19,003 | 15,113 | 16,906 | 15,856 | ||||||||||||
Lease financing | 582 | 663 | 1,295 | 1,462 | 1,560 | ||||||||||||
Governments and official institutions | 1,046 | 1,324 | 1,229 | 826 | 713 | ||||||||||||
$ | 106,364 | $ | 106,620 | $ | 105,566 | $ | 115,730 | $ | 120,166 | ||||||||
Total corporate loans | $ | 187,979 | $ | 191,771 | $ | 169,721 | $ | 185,318 | $ | 199,474 | |||||||
Unearned income | (1,259 | ) | (1,436 | ) | (2,274 | ) | (4,598 | ) | (5,436 | ) | |||||||
Corporate loans, net of unearned income | $ | 186,720 | $ | 190,335 | $ | 167,447 | $ | 180,720 | $ | 194,038 | |||||||
Total loans—net of unearned income | $ | 692,166 | $ | 721,804 | $ | 591,504 | $ | 622,211 | $ | 641,690 | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses—on drawn exposures | (46,197 | ) | (48,746 | ) | (36,033 | ) | (36,416 | ) | (35,940 | ) | |||||||
Total loans—net of unearned income and allowance for credit losses | $ | 645,969 | $ | 673,058 | $ | 555,471 | $ | 585,795 | $ | 605,750 | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans—net of unearned income(2) | 6.72 | % | 6.80 | % | 6.09 | % | 5.85 | % | 5.60 | % | |||||||
Allowance for consumer loan losses as a percentage of total consumer loans—net of unearned income(2) | 7.87 | % | 7.84 | % | 6.70 | % | 6.44 | % | 6.25 | % | |||||||
Allowance for corporate loan losses as a percentage of total corporate loans—net of unearned income(2) | 3.59 | % | 3.90 | % | 4.56 | % | 4.42 | % | 4.11 | % | |||||||
Certain lending products included in the loan table above have terms that may give rise to additional credit issues. Credit cards with below-market introductory interest rates, multiple loans supported by the same collateral (e.g., home equity loans), and interest-only loans are examples of such products. However, Citi does not believe these products are material to its financial position and results and are closely managed via credit controls that mitigate the additional inherent risk.
Impaired Loans
Impaired loans are those where Citigroup believes it is probable that it will not collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include corporate non-accrual loans as well as smaller-balance homogeneous loans whose terms have been modified due to the borrower's financial difficulties and Citigroup granted a concession to the borrower. Such modifications may include interest rate reductions and/or principal forgiveness. Valuation allowances for impaired loans are estimated considering all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value
of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's original contractual effective rate, the secondary market value of the loan and the fair value of collateral less disposal costs. Consumer impaired loans exclude smaller-balance homogeneous loans that have not been modified and are carried on a non-accrual basis, as well as substantially all loans modified for periods of 12 months or less. As of June 30, 2010, loans included in those short-term programs amounted to $7 billion.
The following table presents information about impaired loans:
In millions of dollars at year end | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-accrual corporate loans | ||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 6,565 | $ | 6,347 | ||||
Loans to financial institutions | 478 | 1,794 | ||||||
Mortgage and real estate | 2,568 | 4,051 | ||||||
Lease financing | 58 | — | ||||||
Other | 1,367 | 1,287 | ||||||
Total non-accrual corporate loans | $ | 11,036 | $ | 13,479 | ||||
Impaired consumer loans(1) | ||||||||
Mortgage and real estate | $ | 16,094 | $ | 10,629 | ||||
Installment and other | 4,440 | 3,853 | ||||||
Cards | 5,028 | 2,453 | ||||||
Total impaired consumer loans | $ | 25,562 | $ | 16,935 | ||||
Total(2) | $ | 36,598 | $ | 30,414 | ||||
Non-accrual corporate loans with valuation allowances | $ | 7,035 | $ | 8,578 | ||||
Impaired consumer loans with valuation allowances | 25,143 | 16,453 | ||||||
Non-accrual corporate valuation allowance | $ | 2,355 | $ | 2,480 | ||||
Impaired consumer valuation allowance | 7,540 | 4,977 | ||||||
Total valuation allowances (3) | $ | 9,895 | $ | 7,457 | ||||
Loan Accounting Policies
The following are Citigroup's accounting policies for loans, allowance for loan losses and related lending activities.
Loans
Loans are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income and unamortized deferred fees and costs except that credit card receivable balances also include accrued interest and fees. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are generally deferred and recognized as adjustments to income over the lives of the related loans.
As described in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Citi has elected fair value accounting for certain loans. Such loans are carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings. Interest income on such loans is recorded inInterest revenue at the contractually specified rate.
Loans for which the fair value option has not been elected are classified upon origination or acquisition as either held-for-investment or held-for-sale. This classification is based on management's initial intent and ability with regard to those loans.
Loans that are held-for-investment are classified asLoans, net of unearned income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and the related cash flows are included within the cash flows from investing activities category in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on the lineChange in loans. However, when the initial intent for holding a loan has changed from held-for-investment to held-for-sale, the loan is reclassified to held-for-sale, but the related cash flows continue to be reported in cash flows from investing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on the lineProceeds from sales and securitizations of loans.
Substantially all of the consumer loans sold or securitized by Citigroup are U.S. prime residential mortgage loans or U.S. credit card receivables. The practice of the U.S. prime mortgage business has been to sell all of its loans except for non-conforming adjustable rate loans. U.S. prime mortgage conforming loans are classified as held-for-sale at the time of origination. The related cash flows are classified in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in the cash flows from operating activities category on the lineChange in loans held-for-sale.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 in 2010, U.S. credit card receivables were classified at origination as loans-held-for-sale to the extent that management did not have the intent to hold the receivables for the foreseeable future or until maturity. Prior to 2010, the U.S. credit card securitization forecast for the three months following the latest balance sheet date, excluding replenishments, was the basis for the amount of such loans classified as held-for-sale. Cash flows related to U.S. credit card loans classified as held-for-sale at origination or acquisition are reported in the cash flows from operating activities category on the lineChange in loans held-for-sale.
Consumer loans
Consumer loans represent loans and leases managed primarily by theRegional Consumer Banking andLocal Consumer Lending businesses. As a general rule, interest accrual ceases for installment and real estate (both open- and closed-end) loans when payments are 90 days contractually past due. For credit cards and unsecured revolving loans, however, Citi generally accrues interest until payments are 180 days past due. Loans that have been modified to grant a short-term or long-term concession to a borrower who is in financial difficulty may not be accruing interest at the time of the modification. The policy for returning such modified loans to accrual status varies by product and/or region. In most cases, a minimum number of payments (ranging from one to six) are required, while in other cases the loan is never returned to accrual status.
Citi's charge-off policies follow the general guidelines below:
Corporate loans
Corporate loans represent loans and leases managed byICG or theSpecial Asset Pool. Corporate loans are identified as impaired and placed on a cash (non-accrual) basis when it is determined, based on actual experience and a forward-looking assessment of the collectability of the loan in full, that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful or when interest or principal is 90 days past due, except when the loan is well-collateralized and in the process of collection. Any interest accrued on impaired corporate loans and leases is reversed at 90 days and charged against current earnings, and interest is thereafter included in earnings only to the extent actually received in cash. When there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of principal, all cash receipts are thereafter applied to reduce the recorded investment in the loan.
Impaired corporate loans and leases are written down to the extent that principal is judged to be uncollectible. Impaired collateral-dependent loans and leases, where repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying collateral and there are no other available and reliable sources of repayment, are written down to the lower of cost or collateral value. Cash-basis loans are returned to an accrual status when all contractual principal and interest amounts are reasonably assured of repayment and there is a sustained period of repayment performance in accordance with the contractual terms.
Loans Held-for-Sale
Corporate and consumer loans that have been identified for sale are classified as loans held-for-sale included inOther assets. With the exception of certain mortgage loans for which the fair value option has been elected, these loans are accounted for at the lower of cost or market value (LOCOM), with any write-downs or subsequent recoveries charged toOther revenue.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Allowance for loan losses represents management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio, as well as probable losses related to large individually evaluated impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes only, and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable loan losses inherent in the overall portfolio. Additions to the allowance are made through the provision for loan losses. Loan losses are deducted from the allowance, and subsequent recoveries are added. Securities received in exchange for loan claims in debt restructurings are initially recorded at fair value, with any gain or loss reflected as a recovery or charge-off to the allowance, and are subsequently accounted for as securities available-for-sale.
Corporate loans
In the corporate portfolios, the allowance for loan losses includes an asset-specific component and a statistically-based component. The asset-specific component is calculated under ASC 310-10-35,Receivables—Subsequent Measurement (formerly SFAS 114) on an individual basis for larger-balance, non-homogeneous loans, which are considered impaired. An asset-specific allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value (less disposal costs), or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than its carrying value. This allowance considers the borrower's overall financial condition, resources, and payment record, the prospects for support from any financially responsible guarantors (discussed further below) and, if appropriate, the realizable value of any collateral. The asset-specific component of the allowance for smaller balance impaired loans is calculated on a pool basis considering historical loss experience. The allowance for the remainder of the loan portfolio is calculated under ASC 450,Contingencies (formerly SFAS 5) using a statistical methodology, supplemented by management judgment. The statistical analysis considers the portfolio's size, remaining tenor, and credit quality as measured by internal risk ratings assigned to individual credit facilities, which reflect probability of default and loss given default. The statistical analysis considers historical default rates and historical loss severity in the event of default, including historical average levels and historical variability. The result is an estimated range for inherent losses. The best estimate within the range is then determined by management's quantitative and qualitative assessment of current conditions, including general economic conditions, specific industry and geographic trends, and internal factors including portfolio concentrations, trends in internal credit quality indicators, and current and past underwriting standards.
For both the asset-specific and the statistically-based components of the allowance for loan losses, management may incorporate guarantor support. The financial wherewithal of the guarantor is evaluated, as applicable, based on net worth, cash flow statements and personal or company financial statements which are updated and reviewed at least annually. Typically, a guarantee arrangement is used to facilitate cooperation in a restructuring situation. A guarantor's reputation and willingness to work with Citigroup is evaluated based on the historical experience with the guarantor and the knowledge of the marketplace. In the rare event that the guarantor is unwilling or unable to perform or facilitate borrower cooperation, Citi pursues a legal remedy. If Citi does not pursue a legal remedy, it is because Citi does not believe the guarantor has the financial wherewithal to perform regardless of legal action, or because there are legal limitations on simultaneously pursuing guarantors and foreclosure. A guarantor's reputation does not typically impact our decision or ability to seek performance under guarantee.
In cases where a guarantee is a factor in the assessment of loan losses, it is typically included via adjustment to the loan's internal risk rating, which in turn is the basis for the adjustment to the statistically-based component of the allowance for loan losses. To date, it is only in rare circumstances that an impaired commercial or CRE loan is carried at a value in excess of the appraised value due to a guarantee.
When Citi's monitoring of the loan indicates that the guarantor's wherewithal to pay is uncertain or has deteriorated, there is either no change in the risk rating, because the guarantor's credit support was never initially factored in, or the risk rating is adjusted to reflect that uncertainty or deterioration. Accordingly, a guarantor's ultimate failure to perform or a lack of legal enforcement of the guarantee does not materially impact the allowance for loan losses, as there is typically no further significant adjustment of the loan's risk rating at that time.
Consumer loans
ForConsumer loans, each portfolio of smaller-balance, homogeneous loans—including consumer mortgage, installment, revolving credit, and most other consumer loans—is independently evaluated for impairment. The allowance for loan losses attributed to these loans is established via a process that estimates the probable losses inherent in the specific portfolio based upon various analyses. These include migration analysis, in which historical delinquency and credit loss experience is applied to the current aging of the portfolio, together with analyses that reflect current trends and conditions.
Management also considers overall portfolio indicators, including historical credit losses, delinquent, non-performing, and classified loans, trends in volumes and terms of loans, an evaluation of overall credit quality, the credit process, including lending policies and procedures, and economic, geographical, product and other environmental factors. In addition, valuation allowances are determined for impaired smaller-balance homogeneous loans whose terms have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and where it has been determined that a concession was granted to the borrower. Such modifications may include interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness and/or term extensions. Where long-term concessions have been granted, such modifications are accounted for as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). The allowance for loan losses for TDRs is determined in accordance with ASC-310-10-35 by comparing expected cash flows of the loans discounted at the loans' original effective interest rates to the carrying value of the loans. Where short-term concessions have been granted, the allowance for loan losses is materially consistent with the requirements of ASC-310-10-35.
Loans included in the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) trial period are not classified as modified under short-term or long-term programs, and the allowance for loan losses for these loans is calculated under ASC 450-20. The allowance calculation for HAMP trial loans uses default rates that assume that the borrower will not successfully complete the trial period and receive a permanent modification. As of June 30, 2010, of the loans in which the trial period has ended, 37% of the loan balances were successfully modified under HAMP, 12% were modified under the Citi Supplemental program, 6% received HAMP Re-age, (each as described under Consumer Loan Modification Programs) and 45% did not receive any modification from Citi to date.
Reserve Estimates and Policies
Management provides reserves for an estimate of probable losses inherent in the funded loan portfolio on the balance sheet in the form of an allowance for loan losses. These reserves are established in accordance with Citigroup's Credit Reserve Policies, as approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Citi's Chief Risk Officer and Chief Financial Officer review the adequacy of the credit loss reserves each quarter with representatives from the Risk Management and Finance staffs for each applicable business area.
The above-mentioned representatives covering the business areas having classifiably managed portfolios, where internal credit-risk ratings are assigned (primarilyICG, Regional Consumer Banking andLocal Consumer Lending), or modified consumer loans, where concessions were granted due to the borrowers' financial difficulties present recommended reserve balances for their funded and unfunded lending portfolios along with supporting quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data include:
In addition, representatives from both the Risk Management and Finance staffs that cover business areas that have delinquency-managed portfolios containing smaller homogeneous loans present their recommended reserve balances based upon leading credit indicators, including loan delinquencies and changes in portfolio size as well as economic trends including housing prices, unemployment and GDP. This methodology is applied separately for each individual product within each different geographic region in which these portfolios exist.
This evaluation process is subject to numerous estimates and judgments. The frequency of default, risk ratings, loss recovery rates, the size and diversity of individual large credits, and the ability of borrowers with foreign currency obligations to obtain the foreign currency necessary for orderly debt servicing, among other things, are all taken into account during this review. Changes in these estimates could have a direct impact on the credit costs in any quarter and could result in a change in the allowance. Changes to the reserve flow through the Consolidated Statement of Income on the lineProvision for loan losses.
Allowance for Unfunded Lending Commitments
A similar approach to the allowance for loan losses is used for calculating a reserve for the expected losses related to unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit. This reserve is classified on the balance sheet inOther liabilities. Changes to the allowance for unfunded lending commitments flow through the Consolidated Statement of Income on the lineProvision for unfunded lending commitments.
Details of Credit Loss Experience
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period | $ | 48,746 | $ | 36,033 | $ | 36,416 | $ | 35,940 | $ | 31,703 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | $ | 6,672 | $ | 8,244 | $ | 7,077 | $ | 7,321 | $ | 10,010 | |||||||||
Corporate | (149 | ) | 122 | 764 | 1,450 | 2,223 | |||||||||||||
$ | 6,523 | $ | 8,366 | $ | 7,841 | $ | 8,771 | $ | 12,233 | ||||||||||
Gross credit losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 6,494 | $ | 6,942 | $ | 4,360 | $ | 4,459 | $ | 4,694 | |||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 1,774 | 1,797 | 2,187 | 2,406 | 2,305 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | 563 | 404 | 478 | 1,101 | 1,216 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 290 | 155 | 877 | 483 | 558 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 9,121 | $ | 9,298 | $ | 7,902 | $ | 8,449 | $ | 8,773 | ||||||||||
Credit recoveries | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 460 | $ | 419 | $ | 160 | $ | 149 | $ | 131 | |||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 318 | 300 | 327 | 288 | 261 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | 307 | 177 | 246 | 30 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 74 | 18 | 34 | 13 | 22 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 1,159 | $ | 914 | $ | 767 | $ | 480 | $ | 418 | ||||||||||
Net credit losses | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 6,290 | $ | 6,750 | $ | 4,432 | $ | 5,381 | $ | 5,775 | |||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 1,672 | 1,634 | 2,703 | 2,588 | 2,580 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 7,962 | $ | 8,384 | $ | 7,135 | $ | 7,969 | $ | 8,355 | |||||||||
Other—net(1)(2)(3)(4)(5) | $ | (1,110 | ) | $ | 12,731 | $ | (1,089 | ) | $ | (326 | ) | $ | 359 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses at end of period(6) | $ | 46,197 | $ | 48,746 | $ | 36,033 | $ | 36,416 | $ | 35,940 | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans | 6.72 | % | 6.80 | % | 6.09 | % | 5.85 | % | 5.60 | % | |||||||||
Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(7) | $ | 1,054 | $ | 1,122 | $ | 1,157 | $ | 1,074 | $ | 1,082 | |||||||||
Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments | $ | 47,251 | $ | 49,868 | $ | 37,190 | $ | 37,490 | $ | 37,022 | |||||||||
Net consumer credit losses | $ | 7,490 | $ | 8,020 | $ | 6,060 | $ | 6,428 | $ | 6,607 | |||||||||
As a percentage of average consumer loans | 5.75 | % | 6.04 | % | 5.43 | % | 5.66 | % | 5.88 | % | |||||||||
Net corporate credit losses | $ | 472 | $ | 364 | $ | 1,075 | $ | 1,541 | $ | 1,748 | |||||||||
As a percentage of average corporate loans | 0.25 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.61 | % | 0.82 | % | 0.89 | % | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses at end of period(8) | |||||||||||||||||||
Citicorp | $ | 17,524 | $ | 18,503 | $ | 10,731 | $ | 10,956 | $ | 10,676 | |||||||||
Citi Holdings | 28,673 | 30,243 | 25,302 | 25,460 | 25,264 | ||||||||||||||
Total Citigroup | $ | 46,197 | $ | 48,746 | $ | 36,033 | $ | 36,416 | $ | 35,940 | |||||||||
Allowance by type | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer(9) | $ | 39,578 | $ | 41,422 | $ | 28,397 | $ | 28,420 | $ | 27,969 | |||||||||
Corporate | 6,619 | 7,324 | 7,636 | 7,996 | 7,971 | ||||||||||||||
Total Citigroup | $ | 46,197 | $ | 48,746 | $ | 36,033 | $ | 36,416 | $ | 35,940 | |||||||||
| Credit valuation adjustment gain (loss) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
Non-monoline counterparties | $ | 4,381 | $ | 405 | |||
Citigroup (own) | (2,980 | ) | (299 | ) | |||
Net non-monoline CVA | $ | 1,401 | $ | 106 | |||
Monoline counterparties | 157 | (2,428 | ) | ||||
Total CVA—derivative instruments | $ | 1,558 | $ | (2,322 | ) | ||
The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses)Citigroup's view of non-accrual loans as of the periods indicated. Non-accrual loans are loans in which the borrower has fallen behind in interest payments or, for corporate loans, where Citi has determined that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful, and which are therefore considered impaired. As discussed under "Loan Accounting Policies" above, in situations where Citi reasonably expects that only a portion of the principal and interest owed will ultimately be collected, all payments received are reflected as a reduction of principal and not as interest income. There is no industry-wide definition of non-accrual assets, however, and as such, analysis across the industry is not always comparable.
Corporate non-accrual loans may still be current on interest payments. Consistent with industry conventions, Citi generally accrues interest on credit card loans until such loans are charged-off, which typically occurs at 180 days' contractual delinquency. As such, the non-accrual loan disclosures in this section do not include credit card loans.
Non-accrual loans
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citicorp | $ | 4,510 | $ | 5,024 | $ | 5,353 | $ | 5,507 | $ | 5,395 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 20,302 | 23,544 | 26,387 | 27,177 | 22,851 | ||||||||||||
Total non-accrual loans (NAL) | $ | 24,812 | $ | 28,568 | $ | 31,740 | $ | 32,684 | $ | 28,246 | |||||||
Corporate NAL(1) | |||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 4,411 | $ | 5,660 | $ | 5,621 | $ | 5,263 | $ | 3,499 | |||||||
EMEA | 5,508 | 5,834 | 6,308 | 7,969 | 7,690 | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 570 | 608 | 569 | 416 | 230 | ||||||||||||
Asia | 547 | 830 | 981 | 1,061 | 1,056 | ||||||||||||
$ | 11,036 | $ | 12,932 | $ | 13,479 | $ | 14,709 | $ | 12,475 | ||||||||
Citicorp | $ | 2,573 | $ | 2,975 | $ | 3,238 | $ | 3,300 | $ | 3,159 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 8,463 | 9,957 | 10,241 | 11,409 | 9,316 | ||||||||||||
$ | 11,036 | $ | 12,932 | $ | 13,479 | $ | 14,709 | $ | 12,475 | ||||||||
Consumer NAL(1) | |||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 11,289 | $ | 12,966 | $ | 15,111 | $ | 14,609 | $ | 12,154 | |||||||
EMEA | 690 | 790 | 1,159 | 1,314 | 1,356 | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 1,218 | 1,246 | 1,340 | 1,342 | 1,520 | ||||||||||||
Asia | 579 | 634 | 651 | 710 | 741 | ||||||||||||
$ | 13,776 | $ | 15,636 | $ | 18,261 | $ | 17,975 | $ | 15,771 | ||||||||
Citicorp | $ | 1,937 | $ | 2,049 | $ | 2,115 | $ | 2,207 | $ | 2,236 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 11,839 | 13,587 | 16,146 | 15,768 | 13,535 | ||||||||||||
$ | 13,776 | $ | 15,636 | $ | 18,261 | $ | 17,975 | $ | 15,771 | ||||||||
Non-Accrual Assets (continued)
The table below summarizes Citigroup's other real estate owned (OREO) assets. This represents the carrying value of all property acquired by foreclosure or other legal proceedings when Citi has taken possession of the collateral.
OREO | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citicorp | $ | 870 | $ | 881 | $ | 874 | $ | 284 | $ | 291 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 790 | 632 | 615 | 585 | 664 | ||||||||||||
Corporate/Other | 13 | 8 | 11 | 15 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Total OREO | $ | 1,673 | $ | 1,521 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 884 | $ | 969 | |||||||
North America | $ | 1,428 | $ | 1,291 | $ | 1,294 | $ | 682 | $ | 789 | |||||||
EMEA | 146 | 134 | 121 | 105 | 97 | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 43 | 51 | 45 | 40 | 29 | ||||||||||||
Asia | 56 | 45 | 40 | 57 | 54 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,673 | $ | 1,521 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 884 | $ | 969 | ||||||||
Other repossessed assets(1) | $ | 55 | $ | 64 | $ | 73 | $ | 76 | $ | 72 | |||||||
Non-accrual assets (NAA)—Total Citigroup | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corporate NAL | $ | 11,036 | $ | 12,932 | $ | 13,479 | $ | 14,709 | $ | 12,475 | |||||||
Consumer NAL | 13,776 | 15,636 | 18,261 | 17,975 | 15,771 | ||||||||||||
NAL | $ | 24,812 | $ | 28,568 | $ | 31,740 | $ | 32,684 | $ | 28,246 | |||||||
OREO | $ | 1,673 | $ | 1,521 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 884 | $ | 969 | |||||||
Other repossessed assets | 55 | 64 | 73 | 76 | 72 | ||||||||||||
NAA | $ | 26,540 | $ | 30,153 | $ | 33,313 | $ | 33,644 | $ | 29,287 | |||||||
NAL as a percentage of total loans | 3.58 | % | 3.96 | % | 5.37 | % | 5.25 | % | 4.40 | % | |||||||
NAA as a percentage of total assets | 1.37 | % | 1.51 | % | 1.79 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.58 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1) | 186 | % | 171 | % | 114 | % | 111 | % | 127 | % | |||||||
NAA—Total Citicorp | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAL | $ | 4,510 | $ | 5,024 | $ | 5,353 | $ | 5,507 | $ | 5,395 | |||||||
OREO | 870 | 881 | 874 | 284 | 291 | ||||||||||||
Other repossessed assets | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
Non-accrual assets (NAA) | $ | 5,380 | $ | 5,905 | $ | 6,227 | $ | 5,791 | $ | 5,686 | |||||||
NAA as a percentage of total assets | 0.44 | % | 0.48 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.54 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1) | 389 | % | 368 | % | 200 | % | 199 | % | 198 | % | |||||||
NAA—Total Citi Holdings | |||||||||||||||||
NAL | $ | 20,302 | $ | 23,544 | $ | 26,387 | $ | 27,177 | $ | 22,851 | |||||||
OREO | 790 | 632 | 615 | 585 | 664 | ||||||||||||
Other repossessed assets | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
NAA | $ | 21,092 | $ | 24,176 | $ | 27,002 | $ | 27,762 | $ | 23,515 | |||||||
NAA as a percentage of total assets | 4.54 | % | 4.81 | % | 5.54 | % | 4.99 | % | 4.04 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1) | 141 | % | 128 | % | 96 | % | 94 | % | 111 | % | |||||||
N/A Not available at the Citicorp or Citi Holdings level.
Renegotiated Loans
The following table presents loans which were modified in a troubled debt restructuring.
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corporate renegotiated loans(1) | ||||||||
In U.S. offices | ||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 254 | $ | 203 | ||||
Mortgage and real estate | 169 | — | ||||||
Other | 143 | — | ||||||
$ | 566 | $ | 203 | |||||
In offices outside the U.S. | ||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 192 | $ | 145 | ||||
Mortgage and real estate | 7 | 2 | ||||||
Other | — | — | ||||||
$ | 199 | $ | 147 | |||||
Total corporate renegotiated loans | $ | 765 | $ | 350 | ||||
Consumer renegotiated loans(2)(3)(4)(5) | ||||||||
In U.S. offices | ||||||||
Mortgage and real estate | $ | 16,582 | $ | 11,165 | ||||
Cards | 4,044 | 992 | ||||||
Installment and other | 2,180 | 2,689 | ||||||
$ | 22,806 | $ | 14,846 | |||||
In offices outside the U.S. | ||||||||
Mortgage and real estate | $ | 734 | $ | 415 | ||||
Cards | 985 | 1,461 | ||||||
Installment and other | 2,189 | 1,401 | ||||||
3,908 | 3,277 | |||||||
Total consumer renegotiated loans | $ | 26,714 | $ | 18,123 | ||||
Representations and Warranties
When selling a loan, Citi makes various representations and warranties relating to, among other things, the following:
The specific representations and warranties made by Citi depend on the nature of the transaction and the requirements of the buyer. Market conditions and credit-rating agency requirements may also affect representations and warranties and the other provisions Citi may agree to in loan sales.
Citi's representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits in amount or time of coverage. However, contractual liability arises only when the representations and warranties are breached and generally only when a loss results from the breach. In the event of a breach of these representations and warranties, Citi may be required to either repurchase the mortgage loans (generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest), with the identified defects, or indemnify ("make whole") the investors for their losses.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, almost half of Citi's repurchases and make-whole payments were attributable to misrepresentation of facts by either the borrower or a third party (e.g., income, employment, debts, FICO, etc.), up from approximately a quarter for the respective periods in 2009. In addition, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, approximately 20% of Citi's repurchases and make-whole payments related to changesappraisal issues (e.g., an error or misrepresentation of value), up from approximately 9% for the respective 2009 periods. The third largest category of repurchases and make-whole payments in CVAs2010, to date, related to program requirements (e.g., a loan that does not meet investor guidelines such as contractual interest rate), which was the second largest category in the first half of 2009. There is not a meaningful difference in incurred or estimated loss for each type of defect.
In the case of a repurchase, Citi will bear any subsequent credit loss on derivative instrumentsthe mortgage loan and the loan is typically considered a credit-impaired loan and accounted for under SOP 03-3, "Accounting for Certain Loans and Debt Securities, Acquired in a Transfer" (now incorporated into ASC 310-30,Receivables—Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality). To date, these repurchases have not had a material impact on Citi's non-performing loan statistics because credit-impaired purchased SOP 03-3 loans are not included in non-accrual loans.
As evidenced by the tables below, to date, Citigroup's repurchases have primarily been from the government sponsored entities (GSEs).
The unpaid principal balance of repurchased loans for representation and warranty claims for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:
| Three months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||
In millions of dollars | Unpaid Principal Balance | Unpaid Principal Balance | |||||
GSEs | $ | 63 | $ | 83 | |||
Private investors | 8 | 4 | |||||
Total | $ | 71 | $ | 87 | |||
The unpaid principal balance of repurchased loans for representation and warranty claims for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||
In millions of dollars | Unpaid Principal Balance | Unpaid Principal Balance | |||||
GSEs | $ | 150 | $ | 156 | |||
Private investors | 12 | 10 | |||||
Total | $ | 162 | $ | 166 | |||
In addition, Citi recorded make-whole payments of $43 million and $17 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, and $66 million and $24 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
Citi has recorded a reserve for its exposure to losses from the obligation to repurchase previously sold loans (repurchase reserve) that is included inOther liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The repurchase reserve is net of reimbursements estimated to be received by Citi for indemnification agreements relating to previous acquisitions of mortgage servicing rights. In the case of a repurchase of a credit-impaired SOP 03-3 loan, the difference between the loan's fair value and unpaid principal balance at the time of the repurchase is recorded as a utilization of the repurchase reserve. Make-whole payments to the investor are also treated as utilizations and charged directly against the reserve. The repurchase reserve is estimated when Citi sells loans (recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale, which is included inOther revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income) and is updated quarterly. Any change in estimate is recorded inOther revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
The repurchase reserve is calculated separately by sales vintage (i.e., the year the loans were sold) based on various assumptions. While substantially all of Citi's current loan sales are with GSEs, with which Citi has considerable historical experience, these assumptions contain a level of uncertainty and risk that, if different from actual results, could have a material impact on the reserve amounts. The most significant assumptions used to calculate the reserve levels are as follows:
In Citi's experience to date, as stated above, the request for loan documentation packages is an early indicator of a potential claim. During 2009, loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims increased. In addition, Citi's loss severity estimates increased during 2009 due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and its experience with actual losses at such time. As set forth in the tables below, these factors contributed to changes in estimates for the repurchase reserve amounting to $103 million and $247 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
During the second quarter of 2010, loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims further increased. In addition, there was an overall deterioration in the other key assumptions due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and Citi's continued experience with actual losses. These factors contributed to the $347 million change in estimate for the repurchase reserve in the quarter.
As indicated above, the repurchase reserve is calculated by sales vintage. The majority of the repurchases in 2010 were from the 2006 through 2008 sales vintages and, in 2009, were from the 2006 and 2007 vintages, which also represent the vintages with the largest loss-given-repurchase. An insignificant percentage of 2010 and 2009 repurchases were from vintages prior to 2006, and Citi currently anticipates that this percentage will decrease, as those vintages are later in the credit cycle. Although early in the credit cycle, to date, Citi has experienced improved repurchase and loss-given-repurchase statistics from the 2009 and 2010 vintages.
| Credit valuation adjustment gain (loss) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
Non-monoline counterparties | $ | 4,533 | $ | (1,385 | ) | ||
Citigroup (own) | (357 | ) | 1,214 | ||||
Net non-monoline CVA | $ | 4,176 | $ | (171 | ) | ||
Monoline counterparties | (934 | ) | (3,919 | ) | |||
Total CVA—derivative instruments | $ | 3,242 | $ | (4,090 | ) | ||
The activity in the repurchase reserve for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:
| Three months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 450 | $ | 218 | |||
Additions for new sales | 4 | 13 | |||||
Change in estimate | 347 | 103 | |||||
Utilizations | (74 | ) | (55 | ) | |||
Balance, end of period | $ | 727 | $ | 279 | |||
The table below summarizesactivity in the CVA appliedrepurchase reserve for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 482 | $ | 75 | |||
Additions for new sales | 9 | 19 | |||||
Change in estimate | 347 | 247 | |||||
Utilizations | (111 | ) | (62 | ) | |||
Balance, end of period | $ | 727 | $ | 279 | |||
Citi does not believe a meaningful range of reasonably possible loss related to its repurchase reserve can be determined.
Projected future repurchases are calculated, in part, based on the level of unresolved claims at quarter-end as well as trends in claims being made by investors. For GSEs, the response to the fair valuerepurchase claim is required within 90 days of derivative instrumentsthe claim receipt. If Citi did not respond within 90 days, the claim would then be discussed between Citi and the GSE. For private investors, the time period for responding is governed by the individual sale agreement. If the specified timeframe is exceeded, the investor may choose to initiate legal action.
As would be expected, as the trend in claims and inventory increases, Citi's reserve for repurchases typically increases. Included in Citi's current reserve estimate is an assumption that repurchase claims will remain at elevated levels for the foreseeable future, although the actual number of claims may differ and is subject to uncertainty. Furthermore, approximately half of the repurchase claims in Citi's recent experience have been successfully appealed and resulted in no loss to Citi.
The number of unresolved claims by type of claimant as of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008.2009, was as follows:
| Credit valuation adjustment Contra liability (contra asset) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
Non-monoline counterparties | $ | (3,733 | ) | $ | (8,266 | ) | |
Citigroup (own) | 3,289 | 3,611 | |||||
Net non-monoline CVA | $ | (444 | ) | $ | (4,655 | ) | |
Monoline counterparties | (5,213 | ) | (4,279 | ) | |||
Total CVA—derivative instruments | $ | (5,657 | ) | $ | (8,934 | ) | |
Number of claims | June 30 2010 | December 31 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEs | 4,166 | 2,575 | |||||
Private investors | 214 | 309 | |||||
Mortgage insurers(1) | 98 | 204 | |||||
Total | 4,478 | 3,088 | |||||
Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts and Ratios
| Total loans(6) | 90+ days past due(1) | 30-89 days past due(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except EOP loan amounts in billions | Jun. 2010 | Jun. 2010 | Mar. 2010 | Jun. 2009 | Jun. 2010 | Mar. 2010 | Jun. 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Citicorp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 218.5 | $ | 3,733 | $ | 3,937 | $ | 4,289 | $ | 3,858 | $ | 4,294 | $ | 4,328 | ||||||||||
Ratio | 1.71 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.97 | % | 1.77 | % | 1.94 | % | 1.99 | % | ||||||||||||
Retail Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 109.1 | 804 | 782 | 767 | 1,131 | 1,200 | 1,084 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 0.74 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.74 | % | 1.04 | % | 1.08 | % | 1.05 | % | ||||||||||||
North America | 30.2 | 245 | 142 | 97 | 241 | 236 | 87 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 0.81 | % | 0.45 | % | 0.29 | % | 0.80 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||||
EMEA | 4.3 | 50 | 52 | 70 | 145 | 182 | 235 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 1.16 | % | 1.06 | % | 1.23 | % | 3.37 | % | 3.71 | % | 4.12 | % | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 19.6 | 308 | 352 | 316 | 305 | 346 | 337 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 1.57 | % | 1.81 | % | 1.92 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.78 | % | 2.04 | % | ||||||||||||
Asia | 55.0 | 201 | 236 | 284 | 440 | 436 | 425 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 0.37 | % | 0.43 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.80 | % | 0.80 | % | 0.90 | % | ||||||||||||
Citi-Branded Cards(2)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 109.4 | 2,929 | 3,155 | 3,522 | 2,727 | 3,094 | 3,244 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 2.68 | % | 2.86 | % | 3.07 | % | 2.49 | % | 2.81 | % | 2.83 | % | ||||||||||||
North America | 77.2 | 2,130 | 2,304 | 2,366 | 1,828 | 2,145 | 2,024 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 2.76 | % | 2.97 | % | 2.84 | % | 2.37 | % | 2.76 | % | 2.43 | % | ||||||||||||
EMEA | 2.6 | 72 | 77 | 99 | 90 | 113 | 146 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 2.77 | % | 2.66 | % | 3.54 | % | 3.46 | % | 3.90 | % | 5.21 | % | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 12.0 | 481 | 510 | 707 | 485 | 475 | 693 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 4.01 | % | 4.21 | % | 5.84 | % | 4.04 | % | 3.93 | % | 5.73 | % | ||||||||||||
Asia | 17.6 | 246 | 264 | 350 | 324 | 361 | 381 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 1.40 | % | 1.51 | % | 2.12 | % | 1.84 | % | 2.06 | % | 2.31 | % | ||||||||||||
Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 286.3 | 14,371 | 16,808 | 15,869 | 11,201 | 12,236 | 14,371 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 5.24 | % | 5.66 | % | 4.80 | % | 4.08 | % | 4.12 | % | 4.35 | % | ||||||||||||
International | 24.6 | 724 | 953 | 1,551 | 939 | 1,059 | 1,845 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 2.94 | % | 3.44 | % | 3.93 | % | 3.82 | % | 3.82 | % | 4.67 | % | ||||||||||||
North America retail partner cards(2)(3) | 50.2 | 2,004 | 2,385 | 2,590 | 2,150 | 2,374 | 2,749 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 3.99 | % | 4.38 | % | 4.09 | % | 4.28 | % | 4.36 | % | 4.34 | % | ||||||||||||
North America (excluding cards)(4)(5) | 211.5 | 11,643 | 13,470 | 11,728 | 8,112 | 8,803 | 9,777 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 5.84 | % | 6.27 | % | 5.16 | % | 4.07 | % | 4.10 | % | 4.30 | % | ||||||||||||
Total Citigroup (excludingSpecial Asset Pool) | $ | 504.8 | $ | 18,104 | $ | 20,745 | $ | 20,158 | $ | 15,059 | $ | 16,530 | $ | 18,699 | ||||||||||
Ratio | 3.67 | % | 4.01 | % | 3.68 | % | 3.06 | % | 3.19 | % | 3.41 | % | ||||||||||||
Consumer Loan Net Credit Losses and Ratios
| Average loans(1) | Net credit losses(2) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except average loan amounts in billions | 2Q10 | 2Q10 | 1Q10 | 2Q09 | |||||||||||
Citicorp | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 217.8 | $ | 2,922 | $ | 3,040 | $ | 1,406 | |||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,837 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | $ | 2,922 | $ | 3,040 | $ | 3,243 | |||||||||
Ratio | 5.38 | % | 5.57 | % | 6.01 | % | |||||||||
Retail Bank | |||||||||||||||
Total | 109.3 | 304 | 289 | 428 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 1.12 | % | 1.07 | % | 1.66 | % | |||||||||
North America | 30.7 | 79 | 73 | 88 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 1.03 | % | 0.92 | % | 1.01 | % | |||||||||
EMEA | 4.5 | 46 | 47 | 74 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 4.10 | % | 3.81 | % | 5.30 | % | |||||||||
Latin America | 19.4 | 96 | 91 | 138 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 1.98 | % | 1.99 | % | 3.40 | % | |||||||||
Asia | 54.7 | 83 | 78 | 128 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 0.61 | % | 0.59 | % | 1.10 | % | |||||||||
Citi-Branded Cards | |||||||||||||||
Total | 108.5 | 2,618 | 2,751 | 978 | |||||||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,837 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 2,618 | 2,751 | 2,815 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 9.68 | % | 9.96 | % | 10.02 | % | |||||||||
North America | 76.2 | 2,047 | 2,084 | 219 | |||||||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,837 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 2,047 | 2,084 | 2,056 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 10.77 | % | 10.67 | % | 10.08 | % | |||||||||
EMEA | 2.7 | 39 | 50 | 47 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 5.79 | % | 6.99 | % | 6.73 | % | |||||||||
Latin America | 12.0 | 361 | 418 | 472 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 12.07 | % | 14.01 | % | 15.91 | % | |||||||||
Asia | 17.6 | 171 | 199 | 240 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 3.90 | % | 4.53 | % | 5.94 | % | |||||||||
Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending | |||||||||||||||
Total | 301.7 | 4,535 | 4,938 | 5,144 | |||||||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,278 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 4,535 | 4,938 | 6,422 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 6.03 | % | 6.30 | % | 7.48 | % | |||||||||
International | 26.1 | 495 | 612 | 962 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 7.61 | % | 8.27 | % | 9.72 | % | |||||||||
North America retail partner cards | 53.1 | 1,775 | 1,932 | 872 | |||||||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,278 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 1,775 | 1,932 | 2,150 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 13.41 | % | 13.72 | % | 13.58 | % | |||||||||
North America (excluding cards) | 222.5 | 2,265 | 2,394 | 3,310 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 4.08 | % | 4.20 | % | 5.50 | % | |||||||||
Total Citigroup (excludingSpecial Asset Pool) | $ | 519.5 | $ | 7,457 | $ | 7,978 | $ | 6,550 | |||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 3,115 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 7,457 | 7,978 | 9,665 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 5.76 | % | 6.00 | % | 6.92 | % | |||||||||
Consumer Loan Modification Programs
Citigroup has instituted a variety of modification programs to assist borrowers with financial difficulties. These programs, as described below, include modifying the original loan terms, reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. At June 30, 2010, Citi's significant modification programs consisted of the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), as well as short-term and long-term modification programs, each as summarized below.
HAMP.The HAMP is designed to reduce monthly first mortgage payments to a 31% housing debt ratio (monthly mortgage payment, including property taxes, insurance and homeowner dues, divided by monthly gross income) by lowering the interest rate, extending the term of the loan and deferring or forgiving principal of certain eligible borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgages or who are at risk of imminent default due to economic hardship. The interest rate reduction for first mortgages under HAMP is in effect for five years and the rate then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate cap (the lower of counterparty credit risk embeddedthe original rate or the Freddie Mac Weekly Primary Mortgage Market Survey rate for a 30-year fixed rate conforming loan as of the date of the modification) is reached.
In order to be entitled to loan modifications, borrowers must complete a three- to- five-month trial period, make the agreed payments and provide the required documentation. Beginning March 1, 2010, documentation is required to be provided prior to beginning the trial period, whereas prior to that date, it was required to be provided before the end of the trial period. This change generally means that Citi is able to verify income up front for potential HAMP participants before they begin making lower monthly payments. Citi currently believes this change will limit the number of borrowers who ultimately fall out of the trials and potentially mitigates the impact of HAMP trial participants on early bucket delinquency data.
During the trial period, Citi requires that the original terms of the loans remain in non-derivative instruments. General spread widening has negatively affectedeffect pending completion of the market valuemodification. From inception through June 30, 2010, approximately $8.5 billion of first mortgages were enrolled in the HAMP trial period, while $2.5 billion have successfully completed the trial period. Upon completion of the trial period, the terms of the loan are contractually modified, and it is accounted for as a rangetroubled debt restructuring (see "Long-term programs" below).
Citi also recently agreed to participate in the U.S. Treasury's HAMP second mortgage program, which requires Citi to either: (1) modify the borrower's second mortgage according to a defined protocol; or (2) accept a lump sum payment from the U.S. Treasury in exchange for full extinguishment of financial instruments. Losses on non-derivative instruments, such as bondsthe second mortgage. For a borrower to qualify, the borrower must have successfully modified his/her first mortgage under the HAMP and loans, related to counterparty credit risk are notmet other criteria.
Loans included in the table above.
As of June 30, 2010, of the loans in which the trial period has ended, 37% of the loan balances were successfully modified under HAMP, 12% were modified under the Citi Supplemental program, 6% received HAMP Re-age, (as described under Consumer Loan Modification Programs) and 45% did not receive any modification from Citi to date.
Credit Derivatives Long-term programs. Long-term modification programs or troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) occur when the terms of a loan have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and a long-term concession has been granted to the borrower. Substantially all long-term programs in place provide interest rate reductions. See "Loan Accounting Policies" above for a discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.
The Company makes marketsfollowing table presents Citigroup's consumer loan TDRs as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. As discussed above under "HAMP", HAMP loans whose terms are contractually modified after successful completion of the trial period are included in the balances below:
| Accrual | Non-accrual | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Jun. 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | Jun. 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | |||||||||
Mortgage and real estate | $ | 14,135 | $ | 8,654 | $ | 1,776 | $ | 1,413 | |||||
Cards(1) | 4,995 | 2,303 | 34 | 150 | |||||||||
Installment and other | 3,431 | 3,128 | 333 | 250 | |||||||||
The predominant amount of these TDRs are concentrated in the U.S. Citi's significant long-term U.S. modification programs include:
Citi Supplemental. The Citi Supplemental (CSM) program was designed by Citi to assist borrowers ineligible for HAMP or who become ineligible through the HAMP trial period process. If the borrower already has less than a 31% housing debt ratio, the modification offered is an interest rate reduction (up to 2.5% with a floor rate of 4%) which is in effect for two years, and tradesthe rate then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate is at the pre-modified contractual rate. If the borrower's housing debt ratio is greater than 31%, specific treatment steps for HAMP, including an interest rate reduction, will be followed to achieve a range31% housing debt ratio. The modified interest rate is in effect for two years and then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate is at the pre-modified contractual rate. If income documentation was not supplied previously for HAMP, it is required for CSM. Three or more trial payments are required prior to modification. These payments can be made during the HAMP and/or CSM trial period.
HAMP Re-Age. As previously disclosed, loans in the HAMP trial period are aged according to their original contractual terms, rather than the modified HAMP terms. This results in the receivable being reported as delinquent even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower. Upon conclusion of the trial period, loans that do not qualify for a long-term modification are returned to the delinquency status in which they began their trial period. However, that delinquency status would be further deteriorated for each trial payment not made (HAMP Re-age). HAMP Re-age establishes a non-interest-bearing deferral
based on the difference between the original contractual amounts due and the HAMP trial payments made. Citigroup considers this re-age and deferral process to constitute a concession to a borrower in financial difficulty and therefore records the loans as TDRs upon re-age.
2nd FDIC. The 2nd FDIC modification program guidelines were created by the FDIC for delinquent or current borrowers where default is reasonably foreseeable. The program is designed for second mortgages and uses various concessions, including interest rate reductions, non-interest-bearing principal deferral, principal forgiveness, extending maturity dates, and forgiving accrued interest and late fees. These potential concessions are applied in a series of steps (similar to HAMP) that provides an affordable payment to the borrower (generally a combined housing payment ratio of 42%). The first step generally reduces the borrower's interest rate to 2% for fixed-rate home equity loans and 0.5% for home equity lines of credit. The interest rate reduction is in effect for the remaining term of the loan.
FHA/VA. Loans guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) are modified through the normal modification process required by those respective agencies. Borrowers must be delinquent and concessions include interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness, extending maturity dates, and forgiving accrued interest and late fees. The interest rate reduction is in effect for the remaining loan term. Losses on FHA loans are borne by the sponsoring agency provided that the insurance has not been breached as a result of an origination defect. The VA establishes a loan-level loss cap, beyond which Citi is liable for loss. Historically, Citi's losses on FHA and VA loans have been negligible.
CFNA Adjustment of Terms (AOT). This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a permanent hardship. Payment reduction is provided through the re-amortization of the remaining loan balance, typically at a lower interest rate Modified loan tenors may not exceed a period of 480 months. Generally, the rescheduled payment cannot be less than 50% of the original payment amount unless the AOT is a result of participation in the CitiFinancial Home Affordability Modification Program (CHAMP) or military service member's Credit Relief Act Program (SCRA), or as a result of settlement, court order, judgment, or bankruptcy. Customers must make a qualifying payment at the reduced payment amount in order to qualify for the modification. In addition, customers must provide income verification (pay stubs and/or tax returns) and monthly obligations are validated through an updated credit derivatives, bothreport.
Other. Prior to the implementation of the HAMP, CSM and 2nd FDIC programs, Citigroup's U.S. mortgage business offered certain borrowers various tailored modifications, which included reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. Citigroup currently believes that substantially all of its future long-term U.S. mortgage modifications, at least in the near term, will be included in the programs mentioned above.
Paydown. The Paydown program is designed to liquidate a customer's balance within 60 months. It is available to customers who indicate long-term hardship (e.g., long-term disability, death of a co-borrower, medical issues or a non-temporary income reduction, such as an occupation change). Payment requirements are decreased by reducing interest rates charged to either 9.9% or 0%, depending upon the customer situation, and designed to amortize at least 1% of the balance each month. Under this program, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.
CCG. The CCG program handles proposals received via external consumer credit counselors on behalfthe customer's behalf. In order to qualify, customers work with a credit counseling agency to develop a plan to handle their overall budget, including money owed to Citi. A copy of clientsthe counseling agency's proposal letter is required. The annual percentage rate (APR) is reduced to 9.9%. The account fully amortizes in 60 months. Under this program, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.
Interest Reversal Paydown. The Interest Reversal Paydown program is also designed to liquidate a customer's balance within 60 months. It is available to customers who indicate a long-term hardship.Accumulated interest and fees owed to Citi are reversed upon enrollment, and future interest and fees are discontinued. Payment requirements are reduced and are designed to amortize at least 1% of the balance each month. Under this program, like the programs discussed above, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.
Auto Hardship Amendment. This program is targeted to customers with a permanent hardship. Examples of permanent hardships include disability subsequent to loan origination, divorce where the party remaining with the vehicle does not have the necessary income to service the debt, or death of a co-borrower. In order to qualify for this program, a customer must complete an "Income and Expense Analysis" and provide proof of income. This analysis is used to determine ability to pay and to establish realistic loan terms (which generally consist of a reduction in interest rates, but could also include principal forgiveness). The borrower must make a payment within 30 days prior to the amendment.
CFNA Adjustment of Terms (AOT). This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a permanent hardship. Payment reduction is provided through the re-amortization of the remaining loan balance, typically at a lower interest rate. Loan payments may be rescheduled over a period not to exceed 120 months. Generally, the rescheduled payment cannot be less than 50% of the original payment amount, unless the AOT is a result of a military service member's SCRA, or as wella result of settlement, court order, judgment or bankruptcy. The interest rate cannot be reduced below 9% (except in the instances listed above). Customers must make a qualifying payment at the reduced payment amount in order to qualify for the modification. In addition, customers must provide proof of income and monthly obligations are validated through an updated credit report.
For general information on Citi's U.S. installment loan portfolio, see "U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans" below.
The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2010, information relating to Citi's significant long-term U.S. modification programs:
In millions of dollars | Program balance | Program start date(1) | Average interest rate reduction | Average % payment relief | Average tenor of modified loans | Deferred principal | Principal forgiveness | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending | ||||||||||||||||||||||
HAMP | $ | 2,331 | 3Q09 | 4 | % | 41 | % | 32 years | $ | 289 | $ | 2 | ||||||||||
Citi Supplemental | 835 | 4Q09 | 3 | 24 | 28 years | 46 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
HAMP Re-age | 439 | 1Q10 | N/A | N/A | 25 years | 7 | — | |||||||||||||||
2nd FDIC | 355 | 2Q09 | 7 | 48 | 25 years | 21 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
FHA/VA | 3,604 | 2 | 16 | 28 years | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustment of Terms (AOTs) | 3,700 | 3 | 23 | 29 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Other | 3,782 | 4 | 42 | 28 years | 33 | 47 | ||||||||||||||||
North America Cards | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Paydown | 2,218 | 14 | — | 60 months | ||||||||||||||||||
CCG | 1,756 | 10 | — | 60 months | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Reversal Paydown | 213 | 18 | — | 60 months | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Installment | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Auto Hardship Amendment | 723 | 9 | 28 | 51 months | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
AOTs | 1,062 | 8 | 34 | 106 months | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term programs. Citigroup has also instituted short-term programs (primarily in the U.S.) to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships. These programs include short-term (12 months or less) interest rate reductions and deferrals of past due payments. The loan volume under these short-term programs has increased significantly over the past 18 months , and loan loss reserves for these loans have been enhanced, giving consideration to the higher risk associated with those borrowers and reflecting the estimated future credit losses for those loans. See "Loan Accounting Policies" above for a further discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.
The following table presents the amounts of gross loans modified under short-term interest rate reduction programs in the U.S. as of June 30, 2010:
| June 30, 2010 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Accrual | Non-accrual | |||||
Cards | $ | 3,732 | |||||
Mortgage and real estate | 1,812 | $ | 50 | ||||
Installment and other | 1,364 | 80 | |||||
Significant short-term U.S. programs include:
Universal Payment Program (UPP). The North America cards business provides short-term interest rate reductions to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships through the UPP. Under this program, a participant's APR is reduced by at least 500 basis points for a period of up to 12 months. The minimum payment is tailored to the customer's needs and is designed to amortize at least 1% of the principal balance each month. The participant's APR returns to its own account. Through these contractsoriginal rate at the Company either purchasesend of the term or writes protection onearlier if they fail to make the required payments.
U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending
Temporary AOT. This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a temporary hardship. Examples of temporary hardships would include a short-term medical disability or a temporary reduction of pay. Under this program, the interest rate is reduced for either a single-namefive- or portfolio basis. The Company uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate loan portfolio and other cash positions, to take proprietary trading positions, and to facilitate client transactions.
Credit derivatives generally require thatan eleven-month period. At the sellerend of credit protection make paymentsthe temporary modification period, the interest rate reverts to the buyer uponpre-modification amount. If the occurrencecustomer is still undergoing hardship at the conclusion of pre-defined events (settlement triggers). These settlement triggersthe temporary payment reduction, a second extension of the temporary terms can be considered in either of the time period increments above. In cases where the account is severely past due (over 60 days past due) at the expiration of the temporary modification period, the terms of the modification are definedmade permanent and the payment is kept at the reduced amount for the remaining life of the loan.
U.S Installment and Other Revolving Loans
Temporary AOT. This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a temporary hardship. Under this program, the interest rate is reduced for either a five- or an eleven-month period. At the end of the temporary modification period, the interest rate reverts to the pre-modification amount. If the customer is still undergoing hardship at the conclusion
of the temporary payment reduction, a second extension of the temporary terms can be considered in either of the time period increments above. In cases where the account is severely past due (over 90 days past due) at the expiration of the temporary modification period, the terms of the modification are made permanent and the payment is kept at the reduced amount for the remaining life of the loan.
The following table set forth, as of June 30, 2010, information related to Citi's significant short-term U.S. modification programs:
In millions of dollars | Program balance | Program start date(1) | Average interest rate reduction | Average time period for reduction | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPP | $ | 3,732 | 19 | % | 12 months | ||||||
U.S. Consumer Mortgage Temporary AOT | 1,852 | 1Q09 | 3 | % | 8 months | ||||||
U.S. Installment Temporary AOT | 1,444 | 1Q09 | 5 | % | 7 months | ||||||
Payment deferrals that do not continue to accrue interest (extensions) primarily occur in the U.S. residential mortgage business. Under an extension, payments that are contractually due are deferred to a later date, thereby extending the maturity date by the formnumber of months of payments being deferred. Extensions assist delinquent borrowers who have experienced short-term financial difficulties that have been resolved by the time the extension is granted. An extension can only be offered to borrowers who are past due on their monthly payments but have since demonstrated the ability and willingness to pay as agreed. Other payment deferrals continue to accrue interest and are not deemed to offer concessions to the customer. Other types of concessions are not material.
Please see "U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending," "North America Cards," and "U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans" below for a discussion of the derivative andimpact, to date, of Citi's significant U.S. loan modification programs described above on the referenced credit and are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy of the reference credit and, in a more limited range of transactions, debt restructuring. Credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium. In certain transactions on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities, the seller of protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount.respective loan portfolios.
The following tables summarize the key characteristics
U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending
Overview
Citi's North America consumer mortgage portfolio consists of the Company's credit derivative portfolio by activity, counterpartyboth first lien and derivative form assecond lien mortgages. As of June 30, 20092010, the first lien mortgage portfolio totaled approximately $109 billion while the second lien mortgage portfolio was approximately $53 billion. Although the majority of the mortgage portfolio is reported inLCL within Citi Holdings, there are $18 billion of first lien mortgages and December 31, 2008:$5 billion of second lien mortgages reported in Citicorp.
Citi's first lien mortgage portfolio includes $9.6 billion of loans with Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or Veterans Administration (VA) guarantees. These portfolios consist of loans originated to low-to-moderate-income borrowers with lower FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) scores and generally have higher loan-to-value ratios (LTVs). Losses on FHA loans are borne by the sponsoring agency, provided that the insurance has not been breached as a result of an origination defect. The VA establishes a loan-level loss cap, beyond which Citi is liable for loss. FHA and VA loans have high delinquency rates but, given the guarantees, Citi has experienced negligible credit losses on these loans. The first lien mortgage portfolio also includes $1.8 billion of loans with LTVs above 80%, which have insurance through private mortgage insurance (PMI) companies, and $2.0 billion of loans subject to long-term standby commitments(1) (LTSC), with U.S. government sponsored entities (GSEs), for which Citi has limited exposure to credit losses. Citi's second lien mortgage portfolio also includes $1.5 billion of loans subject to LTSCs with GSEs, for which Citi has limited exposure to credit losses. Citi's allowance for loan loss calculations take into consideration the impact of these guarantees.
Impact of Mortgage Modification Programs on Consumer Mortgage Portfolio
As discussed in "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" above, Citigroup also offers short-term and long-term real estate loan modification programs. The main objective of these programs is generally to reduce the payment burden for the borrower and improve the net present value of cash flows. Citi monitors the performance of its real estate loan modification programs by tracking credit loss rates by vintage. At 18 months after modifying an account, in Citi's experience to date, credit loss rates are typically reduced by approximately one-third compared to accounts that were not modified.
Citigroup considers a combination of historical re-default rates, the current economic environment, and the nature of the modification program in forecasting expected cash flows in the determination of the allowance for loan losses on TDRs. With respect to HAMP, contractual modifications of loans that successfully completed the HAMP trial period began in the third quarter of 2009; accordingly, this is the earliest HAMP vintage available for comparison. While Citi continues to evaluate the impact of HAMP, Citi's experience to date is that re-default rates are likely to be lower for HAMP-modified loans as compared to Citi Supplemental modifications due to what it believes to be the deeper payment and interest rate reductions associated with HAMP modifications.
Consumer Mortgage Quarterly Trends—Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses
The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for the Citi's first and second lien North America consumer mortgage portfolios.
In the first lien mortgage portfolio, as previously disclosed, both delinquencies and net credit losses have continued to be impacted by the HAMP trial loans and the growing backlog of foreclosures in process. As previously disclosed, loans in the HAMP trial modification period that do not make their original contractual payments are reported as delinquent, even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower. Upon conclusion of the trial period, loans that are not modified permanently are returned to the delinquency status in which they began their trial period, adjusted for the number of payments received during the trial period. If the loans are modified permanently, they will be returned to current status.
In addition, the growing amount of foreclosures in process, which continues to be related to an industry-wide phenomenon resulting from foreclosure moratoria and other efforts to prevent or forestall foreclosure, have specific implications for the portfolio:
As set forth in the charts below, both first and second lien mortgages experienced fewer 90 days or more delinquencies in the second quarter of 2010, which led to lower net credit losses in the quarter as well. For first lien mortgages, the sequential improvement in 90 days or more delinquencies was driven entirely by asset sales and HAMP trials converting into permanent modifications. In the quarter, Citi sold $1.3 billion in delinquent mortgages. As of June 30, 2009:2010, $2.5 billion of HAMP trial modifications in Citi's on-balance sheet portfolio were converted to permanent modifications, up from $1.6 billion at the end of the first quarter of 2010. For second lien mortgages, the net credit loss decrease during the quarter was driven by roll rate improvement.
| Fair values | Notionals | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Receivable | Payable | Beneficiary | Guarantor | |||||||||
By Activity: | |||||||||||||
Credit portfolio | $ | 1,391 | $ | 164 | $ | 52,135 | $ | — | |||||
Dealer/client | 149,637 | 133,180 | 1,428,131 | 1,365,688 | |||||||||
Total by Activity | $ | 151,028 | $ | 133,344 | $ | 1,480,266 | $ | 1,365,688 | |||||
By Industry/Counterparty: | |||||||||||||
Bank | $ | 83,725 | $ | 82,057 | $ | 936,852 | $ | 899,598 | |||||
Broker-dealer | 35,842 | 33,912 | 339,239 | 322,349 | |||||||||
Monoline | 7,007 | 89 | 9,925 | 123 | |||||||||
Non-financial | 291 | 262 | 3,780 | 4,805 | |||||||||
Insurance and other financial institutions | 24,163 | 17,024 | 190,470 | 138,813 | |||||||||
Total by Industry/Counterparty | $ | 151,028 | $ | 133,344 | $ | 1,480,266 | $ | 1,365,688 | |||||
By Instrument: | |||||||||||||
Credit default swaps and options | $ | 147,947 | $ | 132,288 | $ | 1,450,601 | $ | 1,363,738 | |||||
Total return swaps and other | 3,081 | 1,056 | 29,665 | 1,950 | |||||||||
Total by Instrument | $ | 151,028 | $ | 133,344 | $ | 1,480,266 | $ | 1,365,688 | |||||
December 31, 2008(1):
| Fair values | Notionals | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Receivable | Payable | Beneficiary | Guarantor | |||||||||
By Activity: | |||||||||||||
Credit portfolio | $ | 3,257 | $ | 15 | $ | 71,131 | $ | — | |||||
Dealer/client | 225,094 | 203,694 | 1,524,553 | 1,443,280 | |||||||||
Total by Activity | $ | 228,351 | $ | 203,709 | $ | 1,595,684 | $ | 1,443,280 | |||||
By Industry/Counterparty: | |||||||||||||
Bank | $ | 128,042 | $ | 121,811 | $ | 996,248 | $ | 943,949 | |||||
Broker-dealer | 59,321 | 56,858 | 403,501 | 365,664 | |||||||||
Monoline | 6,886 | 91 | 9,973 | 139 | |||||||||
Non-financial | 4,874 | 2,561 | 5,608 | 7,540 | |||||||||
Insurance and other financial institutions | 29,228 | 22,388 | 180,354 | 125,988 | |||||||||
Total by Industry/Counterparty | $ | 228,351 | $ | 203,709 | $ | 1,595,684 | $ | 1,443,280 | |||||
By Instrument: | |||||||||||||
Credit default swaps and options | $ | 221,159 | $ | 203,220 | $ | 1,560,222 | $ | 1,441,375 | |||||
Total return swaps and other | 7,192 | 489 | 35,462 | 1,905 | |||||||||
Total by Instrument | $ | 228,351 | $ | 203,709 | $ | 1,595,684 | $ | 1,443,280 | |||||
The fair values shown are prior to the application of any netting agreements, cash collateral, and market or credit value adjustments.
The Company actively participates in trading a variety of credit derivatives products as both an active two-way market-maker for clients and to manage credit risk. The majority of this activity was transacted with other financial intermediaries, including both banks and broker-dealers. The Company generally has a mismatch between the total notional amounts of protection purchased and sold and it may hold the reference assets directly, rather than entering into offsetting credit derivative contracts as and when desired. The open risk exposures from credit derivative contracts are largely matched after certain cash positions in reference assets are considered and after notional amounts are adjusted, either to a duration-based equivalent basis or to reflect the level of subordination in tranched structures.
The Company actively monitors its counterparty credit risk of certain eligible loans to an investor in credit derivative contracts. Approximately 88%exchange for a fee. These loans remain on balance sheet unless they reach a certain delinquency level (between 120 and 180 days), in which case the LTSC investor is required to buy the loan at par.
Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans 90 days or more past due exclude loans recorded at fair value and U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored agencies because the gross receivables as of June 30, 2009potential loss predominately resides with the U.S. agencies.
Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans 90 days or more past due exclude loans recorded at fair value and U.S. mortgage loans that are from counterpartiesguaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored agencies because the potential loss predominately resides with which the Company maintains collateral agreements. A majority of the Company's top 15 counterparties (by receivable balance owed to the Company) are banks, financial institutions or other dealers. Contracts with these counterparties do not include ratings-based termination events. However, counterparty rating downgrades may have an incremental effect by lowering the threshold at which the Company may call for additional collateral. A number of the remaining significant counterparties are monolines.U.S. agencies.
Consumer Mortgage FICO and LTV
Data appearing in the tables below have been sourced from Citigroup's risk systems and, as such, may not reconcile with disclosures elsewhere generally due to differences in methodology or variations in the manner in which information is captured. Citi has noted such variations in instances where it believes they could be material to reconcile the information presented elsewhere.
Citi's credit risk policy is not to offer option adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs)/negative amortizing mortgage products to its customers. As a result, option ARMs/negative amortizing mortgages represent an insignificant portion of total balances since they were acquired only incidentally as part of prior portfolio and business purchases.
A portion of loans in the U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio currently requires a payment to satisfy only the current accrued interest for the payment period, or an interest-only payment. Citi's mortgage portfolio includes approximately $28 billion of first- and second- lien home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) that are still within their revolving period and have not commenced amortization. The interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for the HELOC product across the industry. The first lien mortgage portfolio contains approximately $30 billion of ARMs that are currently required to make an interest-only payment. These loans will be required to make a fully amortizing payment upon expiration of their interest-only payment period, and most will do so within a few years of origination. Borrowers that are currently required to make an interest-only payment cannot select a lower payment that would negatively amortize the loan. First lien mortgage loans with this payment feature are primarily to high credit quality borrowers that have on average significantly higher refreshed FICO scores than other loans in the first lien mortgage portfolio.
Loan Balances
First Lien Mortgages—Loan Balances. As a consequence of the difficult economic environment and the decrease in housing prices, LTV and FICO scores have generally deteriorated since origination, as depicted in the table below. On a refreshed basis, approximately 31% of first lien mortgages had a LTV ratio above 100%, compared to approximately 0% at origination. Approximately 29% of the first lien mortgages had FICO scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis, compared to 16% at origination.
Balances: June 30, 2010—First Lien Mortgages
At Origination | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 58 | % | 6 | % | 7 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 13 | % | 7 | % | 9 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | NM | NM | NM |
Refreshed | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 26 | % | 4 | % | 9 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 18 | % | 3 | % | 9 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | 16 | % | 4 | % | 11 | % |
Note: NM—Not meaningful. First lien mortgage table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico. Table excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs. Table also excludes $1.7 billion from At Origination balances and $0.4 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. Balances exclude deferred fees/costs. Refreshed FICO scores based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Loan Performance Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index.
Second Lien Mortgages—Loan Balances. In the second lien mortgage portfolio, the majority of loans are in the higher FICO categories. The challenging economic conditions have generally caused a migration towards lower FICO scores and higher LTV ratios. Approximately 47% of second lien mortgages had refreshed LTVs above 100%, compared to approximately 0% at origination. Approximately 18% of second lien mortgages had FICO scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis, compared to 3% at origination.
Balances: June 30, 2010—Second Lien Mortgages
At Origination | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 49 | % | 2 | % | 2 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 43 | % | 3 | % | 1 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | NM | NM | NM |
Refreshed | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 22 | % | 1 | % | 3 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 21 | % | 2 | % | 4 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | 32 | % | 4 | % | 11 | % | ||||
Note: N.M.—Not meaningful. Second lien mortgage table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico. Table excludes loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs. Table also excludes $1.6 billion from At Origination balances and $0.4 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. Refreshed FICO scores are based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Loan Performance Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index.
Delinquencies
The tables below provide delinquency statistics for loans 90 or more days past due (90+DPD), as a percentage of outstandings in each of the FICO/LTV combinations, in both the first lien and second lien mortgage portfolios. For example, loans with FICO ³ 660 and LTV £ 80% at origination have a 90+DPD rate of 5.8%.
Loans with FICO scores of less than 620 exhibit significantly higher delinquencies than in any other FICO band. Similarly, loans with LTVs greater than 100% have higher delinquencies than LTVs of less than or equal to 100%.
Delinquencies: 90+DPD Rates—First Lien Mortgages
At Origination | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 5.8 | % | 11.0 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 8.1 | % | 13.5 | % | 16.8 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | NM | NM | NM |
Refreshed | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 0.3 | % | 3.3 | % | 15.0 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 0.8 | % | 7.8 | % | 22.6 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | 2.0 | % | 15.4 | % | 30.3 | % | ||||
Note: NM—Not meaningful. 90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the tables above.
Delinquencies: 90+DPD Rates—Second Lien Mortgages
At Origination | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 1.6 | % | 4.2 | % | 5.1 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 3.7 | % | 4.9 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | NM | NM | NM |
Refreshed | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 0.1 | % | 1.2 | % | 8.2 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 0.1 | % | 1.3 | % | 9.6 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | 0.4 | % | 3.1 | % | 16.6 | % |
Note: NM—Not meaningful. 90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the tables above.
Origination Channel, Geographic Distribution and Origination Vintage
The following tables detail Citi's first and second lien U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio by origination channels, geographic distribution and origination vintage.
By Origination Channel
Citi's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio has been originated from three main channels: retail, broker and correspondent.
First Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
As of June 30, 2010, approximately 54% of the first lien mortgage portfolio was originated through third-party channels. Given that loans originated through correspondents have exhibited higher 90+DPD delinquency rates than retail originated mortgages, Citi terminated business with a number of correspondent sellers in 2007 and 2008. During 2008, Citi also severed relationships with a number of brokers, only maintaining those who have produced strong, high-quality and profitable volume.
CHANNEL ($ in billions) | First Lien Mortgages | Channel % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Retail | $ | 44.4 | 46.3 | % | 5.2 | % | $ | 13.6 | $ | 9.5 | ||||||
Broker | $ | 16.7 | 17.4 | % | 8.2 | % | $ | 3.1 | $ | 5.6 | ||||||
Correspondent | $ | 34.8 | 36.3 | % | 12.3 | % | $ | 11.6 | $ | 13.9 |
Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans subject to LTSCs.
Second Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
For second lien mortgages, approximately 48% of the loans were originated through third-party channels. As these mortgages have demonstrated a higher incidence of delinquencies, Citi no longer originates second mortgages through third-party channels.
CHANNEL ($ in billions) | Second Lien Mortgages | Channel % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Retail | $ | 23.9 | 52.2 | % | 1.8 | % | $ | 3.8 | $ | 7.1 | ||||||
Broker | $ | 11.3 | 24.8 | % | 3.8 | % | $ | 2.0 | $ | 6.8 | ||||||
Correspondent | $ | 10.5 | 23.0 | % | 4.1 | % | $ | 2.5 | $ | 7.5 |
Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.
By State
Approximately half of the Citi's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio is located in five states: California, New York, Florida, Illinois and Texas. These states represent 50% of first lien mortgages and 55% of second lien mortgages.
Florida and Illinois have above average 90+DPD delinquency rates. Florida has 54% of its first mortgage lien portfolio with refreshed LTV>100%, compared to 30% overall for first lien mortgages. Illinois has 45% of its loan portfolio with refreshed LTV>100%. Texas, despite having 41% of its portfolio with FICO<620, has a lower delinquency rate relative to the overall portfolio. Texas has 5% of its loan portfolio with refreshed LTV>100%.
First Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
STATES ($ in billions) | First Lien Mortgages | State % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | $ | 26.1 | 27.2 | % | 7.2 | % | $ | 4.0 | $ | 10.0 | ||||||
New York | $ | 7.9 | 8.2 | % | 6.4 | % | $ | 1.5 | $ | 0.9 | ||||||
Florida | $ | 5.8 | 6.1 | % | 13.0 | % | $ | 2.1 | $ | 3.1 | ||||||
Illinois | $ | 4.0 | 4.2 | % | 9.8 | % | $ | 1.3 | $ | 1.8 | ||||||
Texas | $ | 3.9 | 4.1 | % | 5.7 | % | $ | 1.6 | $ | 0.2 | ||||||
Others | $ | 48.2 | 50.2 | % | 8.7 | % | $ | 17.9 | $ | 13.1 |
Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans subject to LTSCs.
In the second lien mortgage portfolio, Florida continues to experience above-average delinquencies, with approximately 71% of their loans with refreshed LTV > 100% compared to 47% overall for second lien mortgages.
Second Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
STATES ($ in billions) | Second Lien Mortgages | State % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | $ | 12.8 | 27.9 | % | 3.0 | % | $ | 1.8 | $ | 6.4 | ||||||
New York | $ | 6.3 | 13.8 | % | 2.2 | % | $ | 0.9 | $ | 1.4 | ||||||
Florida | $ | 2.9 | 6.4 | % | 4.8 | % | $ | 0.7 | $ | 2.1 | ||||||
Illinois | $ | 1.8 | 3.9 | % | 2.6 | % | $ | 0.3 | $ | 1.1 | ||||||
Texas | $ | 1.3 | 2.8 | % | 1.3 | % | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.4 | ||||||
Others | $ | 20.7 | 45.2 | % | 2.7 | % | $ | 4.4 | $ | 9.9 |
Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.
By Vintage
For Citigroup's combined U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio (first and second lien mortgages), approximately half of the portfolio consists of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which demonstrate above average delinquencies. In first mortgages, approximately 43% of the portfolio is of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which have 90+DPD rates well above the overall portfolio rate. In second mortgages, 62% of the portfolio is of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which again have higher delinquencies compared to the overall portfolio rate.
First Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
VINTAGES ($ in billions) | First Lien Mortgages | Vintage % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | $ | 0.7 | 0.7 | % | 0.0 | % | $ | 0.1 | $ | 0.1 | ||||||
2009 | $ | 3.8 | 4.0 | % | 0.7 | % | $ | 0.5 | $ | 0.2 | ||||||
2008 | $ | 12.3 | 12.9 | % | 4.9 | % | $ | 2.8 | $ | 2.5 | ||||||
2007 | $ | 23.9 | 25.0 | % | 12.2 | % | $ | 8.7 | $ | 11.6 | ||||||
2006 | $ | 17.1 | 17.8 | % | 10.7 | % | $ | 5.4 | $ | 8.1 | ||||||
2005 | $ | 16.5 | 17.2 | % | 6.6 | % | $ | 3.9 | $ | 5.1 | ||||||
£ 2004 | $ | 21.6 | 22.5 | % | 6.9 | % | $ | 6.8 | $ | 1.5 |
Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans subject to LTSCs.
Second Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
VINTAGES ($ in billions) | Second Lien Mortgages | Vintage % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | $ | 0.1 | 0.3 | % | 0.0 | % | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.0 | ||||||
2009 | $ | 0.6 | 1.3 | % | 0.2 | % | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.0 | ||||||
2008 | $ | 4.0 | 8.8 | % | 1.1 | % | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.7 | ||||||
2007 | $ | 13.4 | 29.4 | % | 3.2 | % | $ | 2.7 | $ | 7.2 | ||||||
2006 | $ | 14.7 | 32.2 | % | 3.4 | % | $ | 2.9 | $ | 8.9 | ||||||
2005 | $ | 8.8 | 19.2 | % | 2.6 | % | $ | 1.4 | $ | 4.0 | ||||||
£ 2004 | $ | 4.0 | 8.7 | % | 1.7 | % | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.5 |
Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.
North America Cards
Overview
Citi's North America cards portfolio consists of our Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios located in Citicorp—Regional Consumer Banking and Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, the Citi-branded portfolio totaled approximately $77 billion, while the retail partner cards portfolio was approximately $50 billion.
Impact of Loss Mitigation and Cards Modification Programs on Cards Portfolios
In each of its Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios, Citi continues to actively eliminate riskier accounts to mitigate losses. Higher risk customers have either had their available lines of credit reduced or their accounts closed. On a net basis, end of period open accounts are down 15% in Citi-branded cards and down 13% in retail partner cards versus prior-year levels.
As previously disclosed, in Citi's experience to date, these portfolios have significantly different characteristics:
As a result, loss mitigation efforts, such as stricter underwriting standards for new accounts, decreasing higher risk credit lines, closing high risk accounts and re-pricing, have tended to affect the retail partner cards portfolio faster than the branded portfolio.
In addition to tightening credit standards, Citi also offers short-term and long-term cards modification programs, as discussed under "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" above. Citigroup monitors the performance of these U.S. credit card short-term and long-term modification programs by tracking cumulative loss rates by vintages (when customers enter a program) and comparing that performance with that of similar accounts whose terms were not modified. For example, as previously reported, for U.S. credit cards, in Citi's experience to date, at 24 months after modifying an account, Citi typically reduces credit losses by approximately one-third compared to similar accounts that were not modified. This improved performance of modified loans relative to those not modified has generally been the greatest during the first 12 months after modification. Following that period, losses have tended to increase, but have typically stabilized at levels which are still below those for similar loans that were not modified, resulting in an improved cumulative loss performance. In addition, during the second quarter of 2010, Citi placed fewer accounts into these programs and the results for these programs have remained positive.
Overall, however, Citi continues to believe that net credit losses in each of its cards portfolios will likely continue to remain at elevated levels and will continue to be highly dependent on macroeconomic conditions and industry changes, including continued implementation of the CARD Act.
Cards Quarterly Trends—Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses
The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for Citigroup'sNorth America Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios.
During the second quarter of 2010, Citi continued to see stable to improving trends across both portfolios, based in part, it believes, on its loss mitigation programs, as previously discussed. Across both portfolios, delinquencies declined during the second quarter of 2010. In Citi-branded cards, net credit losses declined sequentially. On a percentage basis, however, net credit losses were up in Citi-branded cards due to declining loan balances. In retail partner cards, net credit losses declined for the fourth consecutive quarter.
Note: Includes Puerto Rico.
Note: Includes Canada and Puerto Rico. Includes Installment Lending.
North America Cards—FICO Information
As set forth in the table below, approximately 73% of the Citi-branded portfolio had FICO credit scores of at least 660 on a refreshed basis as of June 30, 2010, while 65% of the retail partner cards portfolio had scores above 660.
Balances: June 30, 2010
Refreshed | Citi Branded | Retail Partners | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO ³ 660 | 73 | % | 65 | % | |||
620 £ FICO < 660 | 11 | % | 13 | % | |||
FICO < 620 | 16 | % | 22 | % |
Note: Based on balances of $120 billion. Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico and Installment and Classified portfolios. Excludes balances where FICO was unavailable ($2.4 billion for Citi-branded, $2.1 billion for retail partner cards).
The table below provides delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD for both the Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios as of June 30, 2010. Given the economic environment, customers have generally migrated down from higher FICO score ranges, driven by their delinquencies with Citi and/or with other creditors. As these customers roll through the delinquency buckets, they materially damage their credit score and may ultimately go to charge-off. Loans 90+DPD are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquency has been reported by Citigroup to the credit bureaus. Loans with FICO scores less than 620, which constitute 16% of the Citi-branded portfolio, have a 90+DPD rate of 16.3%; in the retail partner cards portfolio, loans with FICO scores less than 620 constitute 22% of the portfolio and have a 90+DPD rate of 16.7%.
90+DPD Delinquency Rate: June 30, 2010
Refreshed | Citi Branded 90+DPD% | Retail Partners 90+DPD% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO ³ 660 | 0.2 | % | 0.2 | % | |||
620 £ FICO < 660 | 0.7 | % | 0.8 | % | |||
FICO < 620 | 16.3 | % | 16.7 | % |
Note: Based on balances of $120 billion. Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico and Installment and Classified portfolios.
U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans
In the table below, the U.S. installment portfolio consists of consumer loans in the following businesses: Consumer Finance, Retail Banking, Auto, Student Lending and Cards. Other Revolving consists of consumer loans (Ready Credit and Checking Plus products) in the Consumer Retail Banking business. Commercial-related loans are not included.
As of June 30, 2010, the U.S. Installment portfolio totaled approximately $64 billion, while the U.S. Other Revolving portfolio was approximately $0.9 billion. While substantially all of the U.S. Installment portfolio is reported inLCL within Citi Holdings, it does include $0.4 billion of Consumer Retail Banking loans which are reported in Citicorp. The U.S. Other Revolving portfolio is managed under Citicorp. As of June 30, 2010, the U.S. Installment portfolio included approximately $33 billion of Student Loans originated under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) where losses are substantially mitigated by federal guarantees if the loans are properly serviced. In addition, there were approximately $6 billion of non-FFELP Student Loans where losses are mitigated by private insurance. These insurance providers insure Citi against a significant portion of losses arising from borrower loan default, bankruptcy or death.
Approximately 37% of the Installment portfolio had FICO credit scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis. Approximately 26% of the Other Revolving portfolio is composed of loans having FICO less than 620.
Balances: June 30, 2010
Refreshed | Installment | Other Revolving | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO ³ 660 | 50 | % | 59 | % | |||
620 £ FICO < 660 | 13 | % | 15 | % | |||
FICO < 620 | 37 | % | 26 | % |
Note: Based on balances of $62 billion for Installment and $0.8 billion for Other Revolving. Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico. Excludes balances where FICO was unavailable ($1.6 billion for Installment, $0.1 billion for Other Revolving).
The table below provides delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD for both the Installment and Other Revolving portfolios. Loans 90+DPD are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquency has been reported by Citigroup to the credit bureaus. On a refreshed basis, loans with FICO scores of less than 620 exhibit significantly higher delinquencies than in any other FICO band and will drive the majority of the losses.
90+DPD Delinquency Rate: June 30, 2010
Refreshed | Installment 90+DPD% | Other Revolving 90+DPD% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO ³ 660 | 0.2 | % | 0.4 | % | |||
620 £ FICO < 660 | 1.3 | % | 1.3 | % | |||
FICO < 620 | 7.7 | % | 6.6 | % |
Note: Based on balances of $62 billion for Installment and $0.8 billion for Other Revolving. Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico.
Interest Rate Risk Associated with Consumer Mortgage Lending Activity
Citigroup originates and funds mortgage loans. As with all other lending activity, this exposes Citigroup to several risks, including credit, liquidity and interest rate risks. To manage credit and liquidity risk, Citigroup sells most of the mortgage loans it originates, but retains the servicing rights. These sale transactions create an intangible asset referred to as mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). The fair value of this asset is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. The fair value of MSRs declines with increased prepayments, and lower interest rates are generally one factor that tends to lead to increased prepayments. Thus, by retaining risks of sold mortgage loans, Citigroup is exposed to interest rate risk.
In managing this risk, Citigroup hedges a significant portion of the value of its MSRs through the use of interest rate derivative contracts, forward purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and purchased securities classified as trading (primarily mortgage-backed securities including principal-only strips).
Since the change in the value of these hedging instruments does not perfectly match the change in the value of the MSRs, Citigroup is still exposed to what is commonly referred to as "basis risk." Citigroup manages this risk by reviewing the mix of the various hedging instruments referred to above on a daily basis.
Citigroup's MSRs totaled $4.894 billion and $6.530 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. For additional information on Citi's MSRs, see Notes 11 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
As part of the mortgage lending activity, Citigroup commonly enters into purchase commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at specific interest rates within a given period of time, generally up to 60 days after the rate has been set. If the resulting loans from these commitments will be classified as loans held-for-sale, Citigroup accounts for the commitments as derivatives. Accordingly, the initial and subsequent changes in the fair value of these commitments, which are driven by changes in mortgage interest rates, are recognized in current earnings after taking into consideration the likelihood that the commitment will be funded.
Citigroup hedges its exposure to the change in the value of these commitments by utilizing hedging instruments similar to those referred to above.
The following table presents credit data for Citigroup's corporate loans and unfunded lending commitments at June 30, 2010. The ratings scale is based on Citi's internal risk ratings, which generally correspond to the ratings as defined by S&P and Moody's.
| At June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corporate loans(1) in millions of dollars | Recorded investment in loans(2) | % of total(3) | Unfunded lending commitments | % of total(3) | |||||||||||
Investment grade(4) | $ | 118,470 | 69 | % | $ | 231,863 | 87 | % | |||||||
Non-investment grade(4) | |||||||||||||||
Noncriticized | 21,312 | 12 | 16,911 | 6 | |||||||||||
Criticized performing(5) | 21,065 | 12 | 14,108 | 6 | |||||||||||
Commercial real estate (CRE) | 5,623 | 3 | 1,781 | 1 | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial and Other | 15,442 | 9 | 12,327 | 5 | |||||||||||
Non-accrual (criticized)(5) | 11,036 | 6 | 3,043 | 1 | |||||||||||
CRE | 2,568 | 1 | 988 | — | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial and Other | 8,468 | 5 | 2,055 | 1 | |||||||||||
Total non-investment grade | $ | 53,413 | 31 | % | $ | 34,062 | 13 | % | |||||||
Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis(4) | 13,738 | 2,216 | |||||||||||||
Loans at fair value | 2,358 | — | |||||||||||||
Total corporate loans | $ | 187,979 | $ | 268,141 | |||||||||||
Unearned income | (1,259 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
Corporate loans, net of unearned income | $ | 186,720 | $ | 268,141 | |||||||||||
The following tables represent the corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking), before consideration of collateral, by maturity at June 30, 2010. The corporate portfolio is broken out by direct outstandings that include drawn loans, overdrafts, interbank placements, bankers' acceptances, certain investment securities and leases and unfunded commitments that include unused commitments to lend, letters of credit and financial guarantees.
| At June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Due within 1 year | Greater than 1 year but within 5 years | Greater than 5 years | Total exposure | |||||||||
Direct outstandings | $ | 177 | $ | 46 | $ | 8 | $ | 231 | |||||
Unfunded lending commitments | 159 | 94 | 10 | 263 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 336 | $ | 140 | $ | 18 | $ | 494 | |||||
| At December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Due within 1 year | Greater than 1 year but within 5 years | Greater than 5 years | Total exposure | |||||||||
Direct outstandings | $ | 213 | $ | 66 | $ | 7 | $ | 286 | |||||
Unfunded lending commitments | 182 | 120 | 10 | 312 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 395 | $ | 186 | $ | 17 | $ | 598 | |||||
Portfolio Mix
The corporate credit portfolio is diverse across counterparty, and industry and geography. The following table shows direct outstandings and unfunded commitments by region:
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
North America | 47 | % | 51 | % | |||
EMEA | 30 | 27 | |||||
Latin America | 7 | 9 | |||||
Asia | 16 | 13 | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
The maintenance of accurate and consistent risk ratings across the corporate credit portfolio facilitates the comparison of credit exposure across all lines of business, geographic regions and products.
Obligor risk ratings reflect an estimated probability of default for an obligor and are derived primarily through the use of statistical models (which are validated periodically), external rating agencies (under defined circumstances) or approved scoring methodologies. Facility risk ratings are assigned, using the obligor risk rating, and then factors that affect the loss given default of the facility, such as support or collateral, are taken into account. With regard to climate change risk, factors evaluated include consideration of the business impact, impact of regulatory requirements, or lack thereof, and impact of physical effects on obligors and their assets.
These factors may adversely affect the ability of some obligors to perform and thus increase the risk of lending activities to these obligors. Citigroup also has incorporated climate risk assessment criteria for certain obligors, as necessary.
Internal obligor ratings equivalent to BBB and above are considered investment grade. Ratings below the equivalent of the BBB category are considered non-investment grade.
The following table presents the corporate credit portfolio by facility risk rating at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, as a percentage of the total portfolio:
| Direct outstandings and unfunded commitments | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
AAA/AA/A | 55 | % | 58 | % | |||
BBB | 25 | 24 | |||||
BB/B | 13 | 11 | |||||
CCC or below | 7 | 7 | |||||
Unrated | — | — | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
The corporate credit portfolio is diversified by industry, with a concentration only in the financial sector, including banks, other financial institutions, insurance companies, investment banks, and government and central banks. The following table shows the allocation of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments to industries as a percentage of the total corporate portfolio:
| Direct outstandings and unfunded commitments | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
Government and central banks | 12 | % | 12 | % | |||
Banks | 8 | 9 | |||||
Investment banks | 7 | 5 | |||||
Other financial institutions | 5 | 12 | |||||
Petroleum | 5 | 4 | |||||
Utilities | 4 | 4 | |||||
Insurance | 4 | 4 | |||||
Agriculture and food preparation | 4 | 4 | |||||
Telephone and cable | 3 | 3 | |||||
Industrial machinery and equipment | 3 | 2 | |||||
Real estate | 3 | 3 | |||||
Global information technology | 2 | 2 | |||||
Chemicals | 2 | 2 | |||||
Other industries(1) | 38 | 34 | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
Credit Risk Mitigation
As part of its overall risk management activities, Citigroup uses credit derivatives and other risk mitigants to hedge portions of the credit risk in its portfolio, in addition to outright asset sales. The purpose of these transactions is to transfer credit risk to third parties. The results of the mark-to-market and any realized gains or losses on credit derivatives are reflected in thePrincipal transactions line on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $49.2 billion and $59.6 billion, respectively, of credit risk exposure were economically hedged. Citigroup's loss model used in the calculation of its loan loss reserve does not include the favorable impact of credit derivatives and other risk mitigants. In addition, the reported amounts of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments in this report do not reflect the impact of these hedging transactions. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying credit exposure with the following risk rating distribution, respectively:
Rating of Hedged Exposure
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAA/AA/A | 48 | % | 45 | % | |||
BBB | 36 | 37 | |||||
BB/B | 11 | 11 | |||||
CCC or below | 5 | 7 | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying credit exposure with the following industry distribution:
Industry of Hedged Exposure
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Utilities | 6 | % | 9 | % | |||
Telephone and cable | 7 | 9 | |||||
Agriculture and food preparation | 8 | 8 | |||||
Chemicals | 7 | 8 | |||||
Petroleum | 6 | 6 | |||||
Industrial machinery and equipment | 4 | 6 | |||||
Autos | 7 | 6 | |||||
Retail | 5 | 4 | |||||
Insurance | 4 | 4 | |||||
Other financial institutions | 7 | 4 | |||||
Pharmaceuticals | 4 | 5 | |||||
Natural gas distribution | 4 | 3 | |||||
Metals | 4 | 4 | |||||
Global information technology | 3 | 3 | |||||
Other industries(1) | 24 | 21 | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS
Market risk encompasses liquidity risk and price risk, both of which arise in the normal course of business of a global financial intermediary. Liquidity risk is the risk that an entity may be unable to meet a financial commitment to a customer, creditor, or investor when due. Liquidity risk is discussed in "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below.above. Price risk is the earnings risk from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, and in their implied volatilities. Price risk arises in non-trading portfolios, as well as in trading portfolios.
Interest Rate Exposure (IRE) for Non-Trading Portfolios
The exposures in the following table represent the approximate annualized risk to Net Interest Revenuenet interest revenue (NIR), assuming an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100bp100 basis points change, as well as a more gradual 100bp (25bps100 basis points (25 basis points per quarter) parallel change in rates as compared with the market forward interest rates in selected currencies.
| June 30, 2009 | March 31, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Increase | Decrease | Increase | Decrease | Increase | Decrease | |||||||||||||
U.S. dollar | |||||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | (1,767 | ) | $ | 1,935 | $ | (1,654 | ) | $ | 1,543 | $ | (1,236 | ) | $ | 1,170 | ||||
Gradual change | $ | (1,005 | ) | $ | 936 | $ | (888 | ) | $ | 660 | $ | (756 | ) | $ | 633 | ||||
Mexican peso | |||||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | (21 | ) | $ | 21 | $ | (20 | ) | $ | 20 | $ | (24 | ) | $ | 24 | ||||
Gradual change | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 15 | $ | (14 | ) | $ | 14 | $ | (19 | ) | $ | 19 | ||||
Euro | |||||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | (29 | ) | $ | 21 | $ | 11 | $ | (12 | ) | $ | (71 | ) | $ | 71 | ||||
Gradual change | $ | (35 | ) | $ | 35 | $ | 12 | $ | (12 | ) | $ | (51 | ) | $ | 51 | ||||
Japanese yen | |||||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | 215 | NM | $ | 195 | NM | $ | 131 | NM | ||||||||||
Gradual change | $ | 122 | NM | $ | 122 | NM | $ | 73 | NM | ||||||||||
Pound sterling | |||||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 11 | $ | 1 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 13 | $ | (13 | ) | ||||
Gradual change | $ | (14 | ) | $ | 14 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | 15 | $ | (15 | ) | ||||
| June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Increase | Decrease | Increase | Decrease | Increase | Decrease | |||||||||||
U.S. dollar | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | (264 | ) | NM | $ | (488 | ) | NM | $ | (1,191 | ) | NM | |||||
Gradual change | $ | (179 | ) | NM | $ | (110 | ) | NM | $ | (694 | ) | NM | |||||
Mexican peso | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | 60 | $(60) | $ | 42 | (42) | $ | (21 | ) | 21 | |||||||
Gradual change | $ | 33 | $(33) | $ | 21 | (21) | $ | (15 | ) | 15 | |||||||
Euro | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | 13 | NM | $ | (56 | ) | NM | $ | 26 | $ | (25 | ) | |||||
Gradual change | $ | 3 | NM | $ | (50 | ) | NM | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 4 | |||||
Japanese yen | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | 133 | NM | $ | 148 | NM | $ | 207 | NM | ||||||||
Gradual change | $ | 89 | NM | $ | 97 | NM | $ | 119 | NM | ||||||||
Pound sterling | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | 16 | NM | $ | (3 | ) | NM | $ | (8 | ) | 8 | ||||||
Gradual change | $ | 8 | NM | $ | (5 | ) | NM | $ | (14 | ) | 14 | ||||||
NM Not meaningful. A 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would imply negative rates for the Japanese yen yield curve.
The changes in the U.S. dollar interest rate exposuresIRE from March 31, 2009 to June 30, 2009 are related tothe previous quarter reflect changes in the customer-related asset and liability mix, the expected impact of the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture, as well asmarket rates on customer behavior and Citigroup's view of prevailing interest rates. The changes from the prior-year quarter primarily reflect modeling of mortgages and deposits based on lower rates, pricing changes due to the CARD Act, debt issuance and swapping activities, offset by repositioning of the liquidity portfolio.
Certain trading-oriented businesses within Citi have accrual-accounted positions. The U.S. dollar IRE associated with these businesses is ($147) million for a 100 basis point instantaneous increase in interest rates.
The following table shows the risk to NIR from six different changes in the implied forwardimplied-forward rates. Each scenario assumes that the rate change will occur on a gradual basis every three months over the course of one year.
| Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | Scenario 3 | Scenario 4 | Scenario 5 | Scenario 6 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overnight rate change (bp) | — | 100 | 200 | (200 | ) | (100 | ) | — | |||||||||||
10-year rate change (bp) | (100 | ) | — | 100 | (100 | ) | — | 100 | |||||||||||
Impact to net interest revenue(in millions of dollars) | $ | 1 | $ | (853 | ) | $ | (1,711 | ) | $ | 686 | $ | 812 | $ | (89 | ) | ||||
| Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | Scenario 3 | Scenario 4 | Scenario 5 | Scenario 6 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overnight rate change (bps) | — | 100 | 200 | (200 | ) | (100 | ) | — | |||||||||||
10-year rate change (bps) | (100 | ) | — | 100 | (100 | ) | — | 100 | |||||||||||
Impact to net interest revenue | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (86 | ) | $ | (371 | ) | NM | NM | $ | (49 | ) | |||||
NM Not meaningful. A 100 basis point or more decrease in the overnight rate would imply negative rates for the yield curve.
Value at Risk for Trading Portfolios
For Citigroup's major trading centers, the aggregate pretax value at risk (VAR) in the trading portfolios was $277$214 million, $292$172 million, $205 million, and $255$277 million at June 30, 2009,2010, March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and June 30, 2008,2009, respectively. Daily exposuresCitigroup trading VAR averaged $260$188 million and ranged from $163 million to $219 million during the second quarter of 2009 and ranged from $224 million to $290 million.2010.
The following table summarizes VAR tofor Citigroup trading portfolios at June 30, 2009,2010, March 31, 2009,2010, and June 30, 2008,2009, including the total VAR, the specific risk onlyrisk-only component of VAR, andthe isolated general market factors only VAR,factor VARs, along with the quarterly averages:averages. On April 30, 2010, Citigroup concluded its implementation of exponentially weighted market factor volatilities for Interest rate and FX positions to the VAR calculation. This methodology uses the higher of short- and long-term annualized volatilities. This enhancement resulted in a 31% increase inS&B VAR, and a 24% increase in Citigroup consolidated VAR, reported at June 30, 2010.
In million of dollars | June 30, 2009 | Second Quarter 2009 Average | March 31, 2009 | First Quarter 2009 Average | June 30, 2008 | Second Quarter 2008 Average | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest rate | $ | 226 | $ | 217 | $ | 239 | $ | 272 | $ | 288 | $ | 301 | |||||||
Foreign exchange | 84 | 61 | 38 | 73 | 47 | 49 | |||||||||||||
Equity | 65 | 94 | 144 | 97 | 95 | 79 | |||||||||||||
Commodity | 36 | 38 | 34 | 22 | 45 | 51 | |||||||||||||
Diversification benefit | (134 | ) | (150 | ) | (163 | ) | (173 | ) | (220 | ) | (188 | ) | |||||||
Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk | $ | 277 | $ | 260 | $ | 292 | $ | 291 | $ | 255 | $ | 292 | |||||||
Specific risk only component | $ | 18 | $ | 20 | $ | 14 | $ | 19 | $ | 15 | $ | 7 | |||||||
Total—General market factors only | $ | 259 | $ | 240 | $ | 278 | $ | 272 | $ | 240 | $ | 285 | |||||||
In million of dollars | June 30, 2010 | Second Quarter 2010 Average | March 31, 2010 | First Quarter 2010 Average | June 30, 2009 | Second Quarter 2009 Average | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest rate | $ | 244 | $ | 224 | $ | 201 | $ | 193 | $ | 226 | $ | 217 | |||||||
Foreign exchange | 57 | 57 | 53 | 51 | 84 | 61 | |||||||||||||
Equity | 71 | 64 | 49 | 73 | 65 | 94 | |||||||||||||
Commodity | 24 | 21 | 17 | 18 | 36 | 38 | |||||||||||||
Diversification benefit | (182 | ) | (178 | ) | (148 | ) | (135 | ) | (134 | ) | (150 | ) | |||||||
Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk | $ | 214 | $ | 188 | $ | 172 | $ | 200 | $ | 277 | $ | 260 | |||||||
Specific risk-only component(1) | $ | 17 | $ | 16 | $ | 15 | $ | 20 | $ | 18 | $ | 20 | |||||||
Total—General market factors only | $ | 197 | $ | 172 | $ | 157 | $ | 180 | $ | 259 | $ | 240 | |||||||
The table below provides the range of VAR in each typemarket factor VARs, inclusive of trading portfolio that was experienced duringspecific risk, across the quarters ended:
| June 30, 2009 | March 31, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | |||||||||||||
Interest rate | $ | 193 | $ | 240 | $ | 209 | $ | 320 | $ | 268 | $ | 339 | |||||||
Foreign exchange | 31 | 91 | 29 | 140 | 33 | 81 | |||||||||||||
Equity | 50 | 153 | 47 | 167 | 63 | 181 | |||||||||||||
Commodity | 26 | 50 | 12 | 34 | 40 | 60 | |||||||||||||
| June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | |||||||||||||
Interest rate | $ | 198 | $ | 270 | $ | 171 | $ | 228 | $ | 193 | $ | 240 | |||||||
Foreign exchange | 36 | 94 | 37 | 78 | 31 | 91 | |||||||||||||
Equity | 48 | 89 | 47 | 111 | 50 | 153 | |||||||||||||
Commodity | 15 | 27 | 15 | 20 | 26 | 50 | |||||||||||||
The following table provides the VAR forS&B for the second quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2010:
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk | $ | 176 | $ | 104 | |||
Average—during quarter | 139 | 144 | |||||
High—during quarter | 180 | 235 | |||||
Low—during quarter | 100 | 99 | |||||
OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS
Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, systems or human factors, or from external events. It includes the reputation and franchise risk associated with business practices or market conduct in which the Company is involved. Operational risk is inherent in Citigroup's global business activities and, as with other risk types, is managed through an overall framework designed to balance strong corporate oversight with well-defined independent risk management. This framework includes:
The goal is to keep operational risk at appropriate levels relative to the characteristics of our businesses, the markets in which we operate, our capital and liquidity, and the competitive, economic and regulatory environment. Notwithstanding these controls, Citigroup incurs operational losses.
Framework
To monitor, mitigate and control operational risk, Citigroup maintains a system of comprehensive policies and has established a consistent, value-added framework for assessing and communicating operational risk and the overall effectiveness of the internal control environment across Citigroup. An Operational Risk Council has been established to provide oversight for operational risk across Citigroup. The Council's membership includes senior members of the Chief Risk Officer's organization covering multiple dimensions of risk management with representatives of the Business and Regional Chief Risk Officers' organizations and the Business Management Group. The Council's focus is on further advancing operational risk management at Citigroup with focus on proactive identification and mitigation of operational risk and related incidents. The Council works with the business segments and the control functions to help ensure a transparent, consistent and comprehensive framework for managing operational risk globally.
Each major business segment must implement an operational risk process consistent with the requirements of this framework. The process for operational risk management includes the following steps:
The operational risk standards facilitate the effective communication and mitigation of operational risk both within and across businesses. As new products and business activities are developed, processes are designed, modified or sourced through alternative means and operational risks are considered. Information about the businesses' operational risk, historical losses, and the control environment is reported by each major business segment and functional area, and summarized for senior management and the Citigroup Board of Directors.
Measurement and Basel II
To support advanced capital modeling and management, the businesses are required to capture relevant operational risk capital information. An enhanced version of the risk capital model for operational risk has been developed and implemented across the major business segments as a step toward readiness for Basel II capital calculations. The risk capital calculation is designed to qualify as an "Advanced Measurement Approach" under Basel II. It uses a combination of internal and external loss data to support statistical modeling of capital requirement estimates, which are then adjusted to reflect qualitative data regarding the operational risk and control environment.
Information Security and Continuity of Business
Information security and the protection of confidential and sensitive customer data are a priority of Citigroup. The Company has implemented an Information Security Program that complies with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and other regulatory guidance. The Information Security Program is reviewed and enhanced periodically to address emerging threats to customers' information.
The Corporate Office of Business Continuity, with the support of senior management, continues to coordinate global preparedness and mitigate business continuity risks by reviewing and testing recovery procedures.
COUNTRY AND CROSS-BORDER RISK
The table below shows all countries where total Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) cross-border outstandings exceed 0.75% of total Citigroup assets:
June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cross-Border Claims on Third Parties | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In billions of U.S. dollars | Banks | Public | Private | Total | Trading and Short- Term Claims(1) | Investments in and Funding of Local Franchises | Total Cross- Border Outstandings | Commitments(2) | Total Cross- Border Outstandings | Commitments(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Germany | $ | 7.9 | $ | 4.0 | $ | 8.2 | $ | 20.1 | $ | 18.4 | $ | 13.4 | $ | 33.5 | $ | 52.1 | $ | 29.9 | $ | 48.6 | |||||||||||
France | 9.9 | 5.1 | 10.0 | 25.0 | 21.1 | 0.2 | 25.2 | 73.3 | 21.4 | 66.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
India | 1.1 | — | 7.6 | 8.7 | 5.7 | 14.5 | 23.2 | 1.5 | 28.0 | 1.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
South Korea | 2.1 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 7.3 | 7.1 | 12.8 | 20.1 | 14.2 | 22.0 | 15.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Netherlands | 5.0 | 1.4 | 12.8 | 19.2 | 14.9 | — | 19.2 | 69.5 | 17.7 | 67.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 7.6 | — | 10.2 | 17.8 | 15.1 | — | 17.8 | 132.1 | 26.3 | 128.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Canada | 1.5 | 0.6 | 3.7 | 5.8 | 4.2 | 9.5 | 15.3 | 32.4 | 16.1 | 36.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cayman Islands | 0.1 | — | 14.7 | 14.8 | 13.2 | — | 14.8 | 6.9 | 22.1 | 8.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Australia | 1.4 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 3.2 | 2.3 | 9.3 | 12.5 | 23.6 | 12.5 | 24.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Italy | 0.9 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 10.2 | 7.8 | 1.9 | 12.1 | 21.1 | 14.7 | 20.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS
Average Rates- Rates—Interest Revenue, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Margin
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 1st Qtr. 2009(1) | 2nd Qtr. 2008(1) | Change 2Q09 vs. 2Q08 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest Revenue(2) | $ | 19,671 | $ | 20,583 | $ | 27,337 | (28 | )% | ||||||
Interest Expense(3) | 6,842 | 7,657 | 13,351 | (49 | ) | |||||||||
Net Interest Revenue(2)(3) | $ | 12,829 | $ | 12,926 | $ | 13,986 | (8 | )% | ||||||
Interest Revenue—Average Rate | 4.97 | % | 5.31 | % | 6.21 | % | (124 | ) bps | ||||||
Interest Expense—Average Rate | 1.94 | % | 2.16 | % | 3.29 | % | (135 | ) bps | ||||||
Net Interest Margin (NIM) | 3.24 | % | 3.33 | % | 3.17 | % | 7 bps | |||||||
Interest Rate Benchmarks: | ||||||||||||||
Federal Funds Rate—End of Period | 0.00-0.25 | % | 0.00-0.25 | % | 2.00 | % | (175+ | ) bps | ||||||
2 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate | 1.02 | % | 0.90 | % | 2.42 | % | (140 | )bps | ||||||
10 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate | 3.32 | % | 2.74 | % | 3.88 | % | (56 | ) bps | ||||||
10 Year vs. 2 Year Spread | 230 bps | 184 bps | 146 bps | |||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009(1) | Change 2Q10 vs. 2Q09 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest revenue(2) | $ | 20,418 | $ | 20,852 | $ | 19,671 | 4 | % | |||||
Interest expense(3) | 6,379 | 6,291 | 6,842 | (7 | )% | ||||||||
Net interest revenue(2)(3) | $ | 14,039 | $ | 14,561 | 12,829 | 9 | % | ||||||
Interest revenue—average rate | 4.57 | % | 4.75 | % | 4.97 | % | (40 | ) bps | |||||
Interest expense—average rate | 1.60 | % | 1.60 | % | 1.93 | % | (33 | ) bps | |||||
Net interest margin | 3.15 | % | 3.32 | % | 3.24 | % | (9 | ) bps | |||||
Interest-rate benchmarks: | |||||||||||||
Federal Funds rate—end of period | 0.00-0.25 | % | 0.00-0.25 | % | 0.00-0.25 | % | — | ||||||
Federal Funds rate—average rate | 0.00-0.25 | % | 0.00-0.25 | % | 0.00-0.25 | % | — | ||||||
Two-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate | 0.87 | % | 0.92 | % | 1.02 | % | (15 | ) bps | |||||
10-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate | 3.49 | % | 3.72 | % | 3.32 | % | 17 | bps | |||||
10-year vs. two-year spread | 262 | bps | 280 | bps | 230 | bps | |||||||
A significant portion of the Company's business activities are based upon gathering deposits and borrowing money and then lending or investing those funds, including market-making activities in tradable securities. Net interest margin (NIM) is calculated by dividing annualized gross interest revenue less gross interest expense by average interest earning assets.
DuringNIM decreased by 17 basis points during the second quarter of 2009, the yields across both the interest earning assets as well as the interest earning liabilities dropped significantly from the same period in 2008. The lower cost of funds compared to prior year more than offset the lower asset yields, resulting is slightly higher NIM.
Net interest margin decreased compared2010 due to the first quartercontinued de-risking of 2009, driven mainly by lower yields onloan portfolios, the consumer loan portfolio both domestically as well as internationally. The second quarterexpansion of 2009 NIM also includesloss mitigation efforts and the one-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million, which negatively impacted NIM by 8bps. This charge was included in interest expense on deposits.Primerica divestiture.
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)
| Average Volume | Interest Revenue | % Average Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 1st Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2008 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 1st Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2008 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 1st Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits with banks(5) | $ | 168,631 | $ | 169,142 | $ | 62,582 | $ | 377 | $ | 436 | $ | 761 | 0.90 | % | 1.05 | % | 4.89 | % | |||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 131,522 | $ | 128,004 | $ | 182,672 | $ | 515 | $ | 550 | $ | 1,326 | 1.57 | % | 1.74 | % | 2.92 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 61,382 | 52,431 | 55,762 | 279 | 335 | 1,044 | 1.82 | 2.59 | 7.53 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 192,904 | $ | 180,435 | $ | 238,434 | $ | 794 | $ | 885 | $ | 2,370 | 1.65 | % | 1.99 | % | 4.00 | % | |||||||||||
Trading account assets(7)(8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 134,334 | $ | 147,516 | $ | 241,068 | $ | 1,785 | $ | 1,984 | $ | 3,249 | 5.33 | % | 5.45 | % | 5.42 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 120,468 | 108,451 | 160,687 | 1,136 | 967 | 1,385 | 3.78 | 3.62 | 3.47 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 254,802 | $ | 255,967 | $ | 401,755 | $ | 2,921 | $ | 2,951 | $ | 4,634 | 4.60 | % | 4.68 | % | 4.64 | % | |||||||||||
Investments(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable | $ | 123,181 | $ | 121,901 | $ | 110,977 | $ | 1,674 | $ | 1,480 | $ | 1,105 | 5.45 | % | 4.92 | % | 4.00 | % | |||||||||||
Exempt from U.S. income tax | 16,293 | 14,574 | 13,089 | 247 | 118 | 138 | 6.08 | 3.28 | 4.24 | ||||||||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 118,891 | 106,950 | 97,456 | 1,514 | 1,578 | 1,305 | 5.11 | 5.98 | 5.39 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 258,365 | $ | 243,425 | $ | 221,522 | $ | 3,435 | $ | 3,176 | $ | 2,548 | 5.33 | % | 5.29 | % | 4.63 | % | |||||||||||
Loans (net of unearned income)(9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 306,273 | $ | 322,986 | $ | 346,975 | $ | 5,410 | $ | 6,051 | $ | 6,976 | 7.09 | % | 7.60 | % | 8.09 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 153,352 | 149,341 | 182,294 | 3,236 | 3,512 | 4,782 | 8.46 | 9.54 | 10.55 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans | $ | 459,625 | $ | 472,327 | $ | 529,269 | $ | 8,646 | $ | 9,563 | $ | 11,758 | 7.55 | % | 8.21 | % | 8.94 | % | |||||||||||
Corporate loans | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 79,074 | $ | 80,482 | $ | 75,372 | $ | 844 | $ | 780 | $ | 757 | 4.28 | % | 3.93 | % | 4.04 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 117,242 | 118,906 | 149,960 | 2,439 | 2,512 | 3,426 | 8.34 | 8.57 | 9.19 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total corporate loans | $ | 196,316 | $ | 199,388 | $ | 225,332 | $ | 3,283 | $ | 3,292 | $ | 4,183 | 6.71 | % | 6.70 | % | 7.47 | % | |||||||||||
Total loans | $ | 655,941 | $ | 671,715 | $ | 754,601 | $ | 11,929 | $ | 12,855 | $ | 15,941 | 7.29 | % | 7.76 | % | 8.50 | % | |||||||||||
Other interest-earning Assets | $ | 57,416 | $ | 51,631 | $ | 92,988 | $ | 215 | $ | 280 | $ | 1,083 | 1.50 | % | 2.20 | % | 4.68 | % | |||||||||||
Total interest-earning Assets | $ | 1,588,059 | $ | 1,572,315 | $ | 1,771,882 | $ | 19,671 | $ | 20,583 | $ | 27,337 | 4.97 | % | 5.31 | % | 6.21 | % | |||||||||||
Non-interest-earning assets(7) | 262,840 | 315,573 | 367,459 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets from discontinued operations | $ | 19,048 | $ | 20,083 | $ | 56,520 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,869,947 | $ | 1,907,971 | $ | 2,195,861 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Average Volume | Interest Revenue | % Average Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits with banks(5) | $ | 168,330 | $ | 166,378 | $ | 168,631 | $ | 291 | $ | 290 | $ | 377 | 0.69 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.90 | % | |||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 186,283 | $ | 160,033 | $ | 131,522 | $ | 452 | $ | 471 | $ | 515 | 0.97 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.57 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 83,055 | 78,052 | 61,382 | 329 | 281 | 279 | 1.59 | 1.46 | 1.82 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 269,338 | $ | 238,085 | $ | 192,904 | $ | 781 | $ | 752 | $ | 794 | 1.16 | % | 1.28 | % | 1.65 | % | |||||||||||
Trading account assets(7)(8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 130,475 | $ | 131,776 | $ | 134,334 | $ | 1,019 | $ | 1,069 | $ | 1,785 | 3.13 | % | 3.29 | % | 5.33 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 149,628 | 152,403 | 120,468 | 992 | 803 | 1,136 | 2.66 | 2.14 | 3.78 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 280,103 | $ | 284,179 | $ | 254,802 | $ | 2,011 | $ | 1,872 | $ | 2,921 | 2.88 | % | 2.67 | % | 4.60 | % | |||||||||||
Investments(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable | $ | 157,621 | $ | 150,858 | $ | 123,181 | $ | 1,301 | $ | 1,389 | $ | 1,674 | 3.31 | % | 3.73 | % | 5.45 | % | |||||||||||
Exempt from U.S. income tax | 15,305 | 15,570 | 16,293 | 197 | 173 | 247 | 5.16 | 4.51 | 6.08 | ||||||||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 138,477 | 144,892 | 118,891 | 1,488 | 1,547 | 1,514 | 4.31 | 4.33 | 5.11 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 311,403 | $ | 311,320 | $ | 258,365 | $ | 2,986 | $ | 3,109 | $ | 3,435 | 3.85 | % | 4.05 | % | 5.33 | % | |||||||||||
Loans (net of unearned income)(9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 460,147 | $ | 479,384 | $ | 385,347 | $ | 9,153 | $ | 9,511 | $ | 6,254 | 7.98 | % | 8.05 | % | 6.51 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 249,353 | 254,488 | 270,594 | 5,074 | 5,162 | 5,675 | 8.16 | 8.23 | 8.41 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 709,500 | $ | 733,872 | $ | 655,941 | $ | 14,227 | $ | 14,673 | $ | 11,929 | 8.04 | % | 8.11 | % | 7.29 | % | |||||||||||
Other interest-earning Assets | $ | 51,519 | $ | 45,894 | $ | 57,416 | $ | 122 | $ | 156 | $ | 215 | 0.95 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.50 | % | |||||||||||
Total interest-earning Assets | $ | 1,790,193 | $ | 1,779,728 | $ | 1,588,059 | $ | 20,418 | $ | 20,852 | $ | 19,671 | 4.57 | % | 4.75 | % | 4.97 | % | |||||||||||
Non-interest-earning assets(7) | 226,902 | 233,344 | 262,840 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets from discontinued operations | — | — | $ | 19,048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,017,095 | $ | 2,013,072 | $ | 1,869,947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY,
AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)
| Average Volume | Interest Expense | % Average Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 1st Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2008 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 1st Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2008 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 1st Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U. S. offices | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits(5) | $ | 167,713 | $ | 164,977 | $ | 163,923 | $ | 999 | $ | 633 | $ | 683 | 2.39 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.68 | % | |||||||||||
Other time deposits | 57,869 | 61,283 | 57,911 | 278 | 416 | 614 | 1.93 | 2.75 | 4.26 | ||||||||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 428,188 | 408,840 | 488,304 | 1,563 | 1,799 | 3,785 | 1.46 | 1.78 | 3.12 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 653,770 | $ | 635,100 | $ | 710,138 | $ | 2,840 | $ | 2,848 | $ | 5,082 | 1.74 | % | 1.82 | % | 2.88 | % | |||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 133,948 | $ | 152,256 | $ | 195,879 | $ | 288 | $ | 316 | $ | 1,299 | 0.86 | % | 0.84 | % | 2.67 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 74,346 | 68,184 | 84,448 | 643 | 788 | 1,648 | 3.47 | 4.69 | 7.85 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 208,294 | $ | 220,440 | $ | 280,327 | $ | 931 | $ | 1,104 | $ | 2,947 | 1.79 | % | 2.03 | % | 4.23 | % | |||||||||||
Trading account liabilities(8)(9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 19,592 | $ | 20,712 | $ | 29,764 | $ | 50 | $ | 93 | $ | 413 | 1.02 | % | 1.82 | % | 5.58 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 36,652 | 31,101 | 45,054 | 19 | 15 | 37 | 0.21 | 0.20 | 0.33 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 56,244 | $ | 51,813 | $ | 74,818 | $ | 69 | $ | 108 | $ | 450 | 0.49 | % | 0.85 | % | 2.42 | % | |||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 136,200 | $ | 148,673 | $ | 152,356 | $ | 209 | $ | 367 | $ | 814 | 0.62 | % | 1.00 | % | 2.15 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 35,299 | 35,214 | 59,531 | 106 | 96 | 147 | 1.20 | 1.11 | 0.99 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 171,499 | $ | 183,887 | $ | 211,887 | $ | 315 | $ | 463 | $ | 961 | 0.74 | % | 1.02 | % | 1.82 | % | |||||||||||
Long-term debt(10) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 296,324 | $ | 309,670 | $ | 315,686 | $ | 2,427 | $ | 2,820 | $ | 3,454 | 3.29 | % | 3.69 | % | 4.40 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 29,318 | 34,058 | 37,585 | 260 | 314 | 457 | 3.56 | 3.74 | 4.89 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 325,642 | $ | 343,728 | $ | 353,271 | $ | 2,687 | $ | 3,134 | $ | 3,911 | 3.31 | % | 3.70 | % | 4.45 | % | |||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 1,415,449 | $ | 1,434,968 | $ | 1,630,441 | $ | 6,842 | $ | 7,657 | $ | 13,351 | 1.94 | % | 2.16 | % | 3.29 | % | |||||||||||
Demand deposits in U.S. offices | 25,039 | 15,383 | 13,402 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8) | 267,055 | 300,614 | 378,465 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities from discontinued operations | 12,122 | 11,698 | 32,229 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 1,719,665 | $ | 1,762,663 | $ | 2,054,537 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Citigroup equity(11) | $ | 148,448 | $ | 143,297 | $ | 135,010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling Interest | 1,834 | 2,011 | 6,314 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Equity | $ | 150,282 | $ | 145,308 | $ | 141,324 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 1,869,947 | $ | 1,907,971 | $ | 2,195,861 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 944,819 | $ | 970,429 | $ | 1,036,000 | $ | 6,452 | $ | 6,643 | 6,631 | 2.74 | % | 2.78 | % | 2.57 | % | ||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 643,240 | 601,886 | 735,882 | 6,377 | 6,283 | 7,355 | 3.98 | 4.23 | 4.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,588,059 | $ | 1,572,315 | $ | 1,771,882 | $ | 12,829 | $ | 12,926 | $ | 13,986 | 3.24 | % | 3.33 | % | 3.17 | % | |||||||||||
| Average Volume | Interest Expense | % Average Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U. S. offices | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits(5) | $ | 186,070 | $ | 178,266 | $ | 173,168 | $ | 461 | $ | 458 | $ | 999 | 0.99 | % | 1.04 | % | 2.31 | % | |||||||||||
Other time deposits | 48,171 | 54,391 | 57,869 | 100 | 143 | 278 | 0.83 | 1.07 | 1.93 | ||||||||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 475,562 | 481,002 | 428,188 | 1,475 | 1,479 | 1,563 | 1.24 | 1.25 | 1.46 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 709,803 | $ | 713,659 | $ | 659,225 | $ | 2,036 | $ | 2,080 | $ | 2,840 | 1.15 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.73 | % | |||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 137,610 | $ | 120,695 | $ | 133,948 | $ | 237 | $ | 179 | $ | 288 | 0.69 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.86 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 100,759 | 79,447 | 74,346 | 560 | 475 | 643 | 2.23 | 2.42 | 3.47 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 238,369 | $ | 200,142 | $ | 208,294 | $ | 797 | $ | 654 | $ | 931 | 1.34 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.79 | % | |||||||||||
Trading account liabilities(8)(9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 39,709 | $ | 32,642 | $ | 19,592 | $ | 88 | $ | 44 | $ | 50 | 0.89 | % | 0.55 | % | 1.02 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 43,528 | 46,905 | 36,652 | 18 | 19 | 19 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 83,237 | $ | 79,547 | $ | 56,244 | $ | 106 | $ | 63 | $ | 69 | 0.51 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.49 | % | |||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 122,260 | $ | 152,785 | $ | 136,200 | $ | 181 | $ | 204 | $ | 209 | 0.59 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.62 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 33,630 | 27,659 | 35,299 | 34 | 72 | 106 | 0.41 | 1.06 | 1.20 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 155,890 | $ | 180,444 | $ | 171,499 | $ | 215 | $ | 276 | $ | 315 | 0.55 | % | 0.62 | % | 0.74 | % | |||||||||||
Long-term debt(10) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 391,524 | $ | 397,113 | $ | 296,324 | $ | 3,011 | $ | 3,005 | $ | 2,427 | 3.08 | % | 3.07 | % | 3.29 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 23,369 | 25,955 | 29,318 | 214 | 213 | �� | 260 | 3.67 | 3.33 | 3.56 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 414,893 | $ | 423,068 | $ | 325,642 | $ | 3,225 | $ | 3,218 | $ | 2,687 | 3.12 | % | 3.08 | % | 3.31 | % | |||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 1,602,192 | $ | 1,596,860 | $ | 1,420,904 | $ | 6,379 | $ | 6,291 | $ | 6,842 | 1.60 | % | 1.60 | % | 1.93 | % | |||||||||||
Demand deposits in U.S. offices | 14,986 | 16,675 | 19,584 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8) | 243,892 | 247,365 | 267,055 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities from discontinued operations | — | — | 12,122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 1,861,070 | $ | 1,860,900 | $ | 1,719,665 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Citigroup equity(11) | $ | 153,798 | $ | 149,993 | $ | 148,448 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling Interest | $ | 2,227 | $ | 2,179 | 1,834 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Equity | $ | 156,025 | $ | 152,172 | $ | 150,282 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 2,017,095 | $ | 2,013,072 | $ | 1,869,947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | 1,087,675 | $ | 1,080,673 | $ | 944,819 | 8,136 | $ | 8,660 | $ | 6,452 | 3.00 | % | 3.25 | % | 2.74 | % | |||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 702,518 | 699,055 | 643,240 | 5,903 | 5,901 | 6,377 | 3.37 | % | 3.42 | 3.98 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,790,193 | $ | 1,779,728 | $ | 1,588,059 | $ | 14,039 | $ | 14,561 | $ | 12,829 | 3.15 | % | 3.32 | % | 3.24 | % | |||||||||||
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)
| Average Volume | Interest Revenue | % Average Rate | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2008 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2008 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2008 | ||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits with banks(5) | $ | 168,887 | $ | 61,952 | $ | 813 | $ | 1,537 | 0.97 | % | 4.99 | % | ||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 129,763 | $ | 180,046 | $ | 1,065 | $ | 3,072 | 1.66 | % | 3.43 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 56,907 | 78,460 | 614 | 2,464 | 2.18 | 6.32 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 186,670 | $ | 258,506 | $ | 1,679 | $ | 5,536 | 1.81 | % | 4.31 | % | ||||||||
Trading account assets(7)(8) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 140,925 | $ | 247,612 | $ | 3,769 | $ | 6,883 | 5.39 | % | 5.59 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 114,460 | 166,454 | 2,103 | 2,542 | 3.71 | 3.07 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 255,385 | $ | 414,066 | $ | 5,872 | $ | 9,425 | 4.64 | % | 4.58 | % | ||||||||
Investments(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | ||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable | $ | 122,541 | $ | 107,726 | $ | 3,154 | $ | 2,284 | 5.19 | % | 4.26 | % | ||||||||
Exempt from U.S. income tax | 15,434 | 13,060 | 365 | 297 | 4.77 | 4.57 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 112,921 | 98,609 | 3,092 | 2,654 | 5.52 | 5.41 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 250,896 | $ | 219,395 | $ | 6,611 | $ | 5,235 | 5.31 | % | 4.80 | % | ||||||||
Loans (net of unearned income)(9) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer loans | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 314,630 | $ | 349,900 | $ | 11,461 | $ | 14,158 | 7.35 | % | 8.14 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 151,347 | 180,186 | 6,748 | 9,420 | 8.99 | 10.51 | ||||||||||||||
Total consumer loans | $ | 465,977 | $ | 530,086 | $ | 18,209 | $ | 23,578 | 7.88 | % | 8.94 | % | ||||||||
Corporate loans | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 79,778 | $ | 75,778 | $ | 1,624 | $ | 1,751 | 4.11 | % | 4.65 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 118,074 | 153,034 | 4,951 | 7,026 | 8.46 | 9.23 | ||||||||||||||
Total corporate loans | $ | 197,852 | $ | 228,812 | $ | 6,575 | $ | 8,777 | 6.70 | % | 7.71 | % | ||||||||
Total loans | $ | 663,829 | $ | 758,898 | $ | 24,784 | $ | 32,355 | 7.53 | % | 8.57 | % | ||||||||
Other interest-earning assets | $ | 54,524 | $ | 105,473 | $ | 495 | $ | 2,410 | 1.83 | % | 4.59 | % | ||||||||
Total interest-earning assets | $ | 1,580,191 | $ | 1,818,290 | $ | 40,254 | $ | 56,498 | 5.14 | % | 6.25 | % | ||||||||
Non-interest-earning assets(7) | 289,207 | 384,383 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets from discontinued operations | 19,566 | 57,945 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,888,964 | $ | 2,260,618 | ||||||||||||||||
| Average Volume | Interest Revenue | % Average Rate | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits with banks(5) | $ | 167,354 | $ | 168,887 | $ | 581 | $ | 813 | 0.70 | % | 0.97 | % | ||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 173,158 | $ | 129,763 | $ | 923 | $ | 1,065 | 1.07 | % | 1.66 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 80,554 | 56,907 | 610 | 614 | 1.53 | 2.18 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 253,712 | $ | 186,670 | $ | 1,533 | $ | 1,679 | 1.22 | % | 1.81 | % | ||||||||
Trading account assets(7)(8) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 131,126 | $ | 140,925 | $ | 2,088 | $ | 3,769 | 3.21 | % | 5.39 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 151,015 | 114,460 | 1,795 | 2,103 | 2.40 | 3.71 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 282,141 | $ | 255,385 | $ | 3,883 | $ | 5,872 | 2.78 | % | 4.64 | % | ||||||||
Investments(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | ||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable | $ | 154,239 | $ | 122,541 | $ | 2,690 | $ | 3,154 | 3.52 | % | 5.19 | % | ||||||||
Exempt from U.S. income tax | 15,438 | 15,434 | 370 | 365 | 4.83 | 4.77 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 141,685 | 112,921 | 3,035 | 3,092 | 4.32 | 5.52 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 311,362 | $ | 250,896 | $ | 6,095 | $ | 6,611 | 3.95 | % | 5.31 | % | ||||||||
Loans (net of unearned income)(9) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 469,765 | $ | 394,408 | $ | 18,663 | $ | 13,085 | 8.01 | % | 6.69 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 251,921 | 269,421 | 10,237 | 11,699 | 8.19 | 8.76 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 721,686 | $ | 663,829 | $ | 28,900 | $ | 24,784 | 8.08 | % | 7.53 | % | ||||||||
Other interest-earning assets | $ | 48,707 | $ | 54,524 | $ | 278 | $ | 495 | 1.15 | % | 1.83 | % | ||||||||
Total interest-earning assets | $ | 1,784,962 | $ | 1,580,191 | $ | 41,270 | $ | 40,254 | 4.66 | % | 5.14 | % | ||||||||
Non-interest-earning assets(7) | 230,122 | 289,207 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets from discontinued operations | — | 19,566 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,015,084 | $ | 1,888,964 | ||||||||||||||||
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY,
AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)
| Average Volume | Interest Expense | % Average Rate | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2008 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2008 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2008 | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U. S. offices | ||||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits(5) | $ | 166,345 | $ | 164,434 | $ | 1,632 | $ | 1,723 | 1.98 | % | 2.11 | % | ||||||||
Other time deposits | 59,576 | 61,352 | 694 | 1,391 | 2.35 | 4.56 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 418,514 | 497,266 | 3,362 | 8,162 | 1.62 | 3.30 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 644,435 | $ | 723,052 | $ | 5,688 | $ | 11,276 | 1.78 | % | 3.14 | % | ||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 143,102 | $ | 202,879 | $ | 604 | $ | 3,334 | 0.85 | % | 3.30 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 71,265 | 101,132 | 1,431 | 3,504 | 4.05 | 6.97 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 214,367 | $ | 304,011 | $ | 2,035 | $ | 6,838 | 1.91 | % | 4.52 | % | ||||||||
Trading account liabilities(8)(9) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 20,152 | $ | 33,739 | $ | 143 | $ | 683 | 1.43 | % | 4.07 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 33,877 | 48,673 | 34 | 96 | 0.20 | 0.40 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 54,029 | $ | 82,412 | $ | 177 | $ | 779 | 0.66 | % | 1.90 | % | ||||||||
Short-term borrowings | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 142,437 | $ | 159,988 | $ | 576 | $ | 1,966 | 0.82 | % | 2.47 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 35,257 | 58,909 | 202 | 343 | 1.16 | 1.17 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 177,694 | $ | 218,897 | $ | 778 | $ | 2,309 | 0.88 | % | 2.12 | % | ||||||||
Long-term debt(10) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 302,997 | $ | 307,517 | $ | 5,247 | $ | 7,285 | 3.49 | % | 4.76 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 31,688 | 38,641 | 574 | 937 | 3.65 | 4.88 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 334,685 | $ | 346,158 | $ | 5,821 | $ | 8,222 | 3.51 | % | 4.78 | % | ||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 1,425,210 | $ | 1,674,530 | $ | 14,499 | $ | 29,424 | 2.05 | % | 3.53 | % | ||||||||
Demand deposits in U.S. offices | 20,214 | 13,180 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest bearing liabilities(8) | 283,835 | 405,821 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities from discontinued operations | 11,910 | 31,285 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 1,741,169 | $ | 2,124,816 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Citigroup equity(11) | $ | 145,873 | $ | 130,983 | ||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | 1,922 | 4,819 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Equity | $ | 147,795 | $ | 135,802 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 1,888,964 | $ | 2,260,618 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 957,624 | $ | 1,050,297 | $ | 13,095 | $ | 12,763 | 2.76 | % | 2.44 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 622,567 | 767,993 | 12,660 | 14,311 | 4.10 | 3.75 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,580,191 | $ | 1,818,290 | $ | 25,755 | $ | 27,074 | 3.29 | % | 2.99 | % | ||||||||
| Average Volume | Interest Expense | % Average Rate | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U. S. offices | ||||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits(5) | $ | 182,168 | $ | 169,073 | $ | 919 | $ | 1,632 | 1.02 | % | 1.95 | % | ||||||||
Other time deposits | 51,281 | 59,576 | 243 | 694 | 0.96 | 2.35 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 478,282 | 418,514 | 2,954 | 3,362 | 1.25 | 1.62 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 711,731 | $ | 647,163 | $ | 4,116 | $ | 5,688 | 1.17 | % | 1.77 | % | ||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 129,153 | $ | 143,102 | $ | 416 | $ | 604 | 0.65 | % | 0.85 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 90,103 | 71,265 | 1,035 | 1,431 | 2.32 | 4.05 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 219,256 | $ | 214,367 | $ | 1,451 | $ | 2,035 | 1.33 | % | 1.91 | % | ||||||||
Trading account liabilities(8)(9) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 36,176 | $ | 20,152 | $ | 132 | $ | 143 | 0.74 | % | 1.43 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 45,216 | 33,877 | 37 | 34 | 0.17 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 81,392 | $ | 54,029 | $ | 169 | $ | 177 | 0.42 | % | 0.66 | % | ||||||||
Short-term borrowings | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 137,522 | $ | 142,437 | $ | 385 | $ | 576 | 0.56 | % | 0.82 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 30,645 | 35,257 | 106 | 202 | 0.70 | 1.16 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 168,167 | $ | 177,694 | $ | 491 | $ | 778 | 0.59 | % | 0.88 | % | ||||||||
Long-term debt(10) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 394,318 | $ | 302,997 | $ | 6,016 | $ | 5,247 | 3.08 | % | 3.49 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 24,662 | 31,688 | 427 | 574 | 3.49 | 3.65 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 418,980 | $ | 334,685 | 6,443 | $ | 5,821 | 3.10 | % | 3.51 | % | |||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 1,599,526 | $ | 1,427,938 | 12,670 | $ | 14,499 | 1.60 | % | 2.05 | % | |||||||||
Demand deposits in U.S. offices | 15,831 | 17,486 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest bearing liabilities(8) | 245,629 | 283,835 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities from discontinued operations | — | 11,910 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 1,860,986 | $ | 1,741,169 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Citigroup equity(11) | $ | 151,895 | $ | 145,873 | ||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | 2,203 | 1,922 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Equity | $ | 154,098 | $ | 147,795 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 2,015,084 | $ | 1,888,964 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 1,084,175 | $ | 957,624 | $ | 16,796 | $ | 13,095 | 3.12 | % | 2.76 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 700,787 | 622,567 | 11,804 | 12,660 | 3.40 | % | 4.10 | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,784,962 | $ | 1,580,191 | $ | 28,600 | $ | 25,755 | 3.23 | % | 3.29 | % | ||||||||
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)
| 2nd Qtr. 2009 vs. 1st Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | |||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | |||||||||||||
Deposits with banks(4) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (58 | ) | $ | (59 | ) | $ | 579 | $ | (963 | ) | $ | (384 | ) | ||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 15 | $ | (50 | ) | $ | (35 | ) | $ | (307 | ) | $ | (504 | ) | $ | (811 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 51 | (107 | ) | (56 | ) | 96 | (861 | ) | (765 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | 66 | $ | (157 | ) | $ | (91 | ) | $ | (211 | ) | $ | (1,365 | ) | $ | (1,576 | ) | ||
Trading account assets(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (175 | ) | $ | (24 | ) | $ | (199 | ) | $ | (1,419 | ) | $ | (45 | ) | $ | (1,464 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 111 | 58 | 169 | (370 | ) | 121 | (249 | ) | |||||||||||
Total | $ | (64 | ) | $ | 34 | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (1,789 | ) | $ | 76 | $ | (1,713 | ) | |||
Investments(1) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 36 | $ | 287 | $ | 323 | $ | 169 | $ | 509 | $ | 678 | |||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 165 | (229 | ) | (64 | ) | 275 | (66 | ) | 209 | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 201 | $ | 58 | $ | 259 | $ | 444 | $ | 443 | $ | 887 | |||||||
Loans—consumer | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (305 | ) | $ | (336 | ) | $ | (641 | ) | $ | (769 | ) | $ | (797 | ) | $ | (1,566 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 93 | (369 | ) | (276 | ) | (693 | ) | (853 | ) | (1,546 | ) | ||||||||
Total | $ | (212 | ) | $ | (705 | ) | $ | (917 | ) | $ | (1,462 | ) | $ | (1,650 | ) | $ | (3,112 | ) | |
Loans—corporate | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (14 | ) | $ | 78 | $ | 64 | $ | 38 | $ | 49 | $ | 87 | ||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (35 | ) | (38 | ) | (73 | ) | (700 | ) | (287 | ) | (987 | ) | |||||||
Total | $ | (49 | ) | $ | 40 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | (662 | ) | $ | (238 | ) | $ | (900 | ) | ||
Total loans | $ | (261 | ) | $ | (665 | ) | $ | (926 | ) | $ | (2,124 | ) | $ | (1,888 | ) | $ | (4,012 | ) | |
Other interest-earning assets | $ | 29 | $ | (94 | ) | $ | (65 | ) | $ | (313 | ) | $ | (555 | ) | $ | (868 | ) | ||
Total interest revenue | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (882 | ) | $ | (912 | ) | $ | (3,414 | ) | $ | (4,252 | ) | $ | (7,666 | ) | |
| 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | |||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | |||||||||||||
Deposits with banks(4) | $ | 3 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (85 | ) | $ | (86 | ) | |||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 71 | $ | (90 | ) | $ | (19 | ) | $ | 172 | $ | (235 | ) | $ | (63 | ) | |||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 19 | 29 | 48 | 89 | (39 | ) | 50 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 90 | $ | (61 | ) | $ | 29 | $ | 261 | $ | (274 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | ||||
Trading account assets(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (40 | ) | $ | (50 | ) | $ | (50 | ) | $ | (716 | ) | $ | (766 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (15 | ) | 204 | 189 | 238 | (382 | ) | (144 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | (25 | ) | $ | 164 | $ | 139 | $ | 188 | $ | (1,098 | ) | $ | (910 | ) | ||||
Investments(1) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 59 | $ | (123 | ) | $ | (64 | ) | $ | 394 | $ | (817 | ) | $ | (423 | ) | |||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (69 | ) | 10 | (59 | ) | 229 | (255 | ) | (26 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (113 | ) | $ | (123 | ) | $ | 623 | $ | (1,072 | ) | $ | (449 | ) | ||
Loans (net of unearned income)(6) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (383 | ) | $ | 25 | $ | (358 | ) | $ | 1,341 | $ | 1,558 | $ | 2,899 | |||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (104 | ) | 16 | (88 | ) | (436 | ) | (165 | ) | (601 | ) | ||||||||
Total | $ | (487 | ) | $ | 41 | $ | (446 | ) | 905 | $ | 1,393 | $ | 2,298 | ||||||
Other interest-earning assets | $ | 17 | $ | (51 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (20 | ) | $ | (73 | ) | $ | (93 | ) | ||
Total interest revenue | $ | (412 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | (434 | ) | $ | 1,956 | $ | (1,209 | ) | $ | 747 | |||
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)
| 2nd Qtr. 2009 vs. 1st Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | |||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | |||||||||||||
Deposits | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 231 | $ | 228 | $ | 22 | $ | (42 | ) | $ | (20 | ) | ||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 82 | (318 | ) | (236 | ) | (420 | ) | (1,802 | ) | (2,222 | ) | ||||||||
Total | $ | 79 | $ | (87 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (398 | ) | $ | (1,844 | ) | $ | (2,242 | ) | ||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (39 | ) | $ | 11 | $ | (28 | ) | $ | (322 | ) | $ | (689 | ) | $ | (1,011 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 66 | (211 | ) | (145 | ) | (178 | ) | (827 | ) | (1,005 | ) | ||||||||
Total | $ | 27 | $ | (200 | ) | $ | (173 | ) | $ | (500 | ) | $ | (1,516 | ) | $ | (2,016 | ) | ||
Trading account liabilities(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (38 | ) | $ | (43 | ) | $ | (107 | ) | $ | (256 | ) | $ | (363 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 3 | 1 | 4 | (6 | ) | (12 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | (2 | ) | $ | (37 | ) | $ | (39 | ) | $ | (113 | ) | $ | (268 | ) | $ | (381 | ) | |
Short-term borrowings | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (28 | ) | $ | (130 | ) | $ | (158 | ) | $ | (78 | ) | $ | (527 | ) | $ | (605 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | — | 10 | 10 | (69 | ) | 28 | (41 | ) | |||||||||||
Total | $ | (28 | ) | $ | (120 | ) | $ | (148 | ) | $ | (147 | ) | $ | (499 | ) | $ | (646 | ) | |
Long-term debt | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (118 | ) | $ | (275 | ) | $ | (393 | ) | $ | (201 | ) | $ | (826 | ) | $ | (1,027 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (42 | ) | (12 | ) | (54 | ) | (89 | ) | (108 | ) | (197 | ) | |||||||
Total | $ | (160 | ) | $ | (287 | ) | $ | (447 | ) | $ | (290 | ) | $ | (934 | ) | $ | (1,224 | ) | |
Total interest expense | $ | (84 | ) | $ | (731 | ) | $ | (815 | ) | $ | (1,448 | ) | $ | (5,061 | ) | $ | (6,509 | ) | |
Net interest revenue | $ | 54 | $ | (151 | ) | $ | (97 | ) | $ | (1,966 | ) | $ | 809 | $ | (1,157 | ) | |||
| 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | |||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | |||||||||||||
Deposits | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 4 | $ | (44 | ) | $ | (40 | ) | $ | 17 | $ | (733 | ) | (716 | ) | ||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (17 | ) | 13 | (4 | ) | 162 | (250 | ) | (88 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | (13 | ) | $ | (31 | ) | $ | (44 | ) | $ | 179 | $ | (983 | ) | (804 | ) | |||
Federal funds purchased and | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 27 | $ | 31 | $ | 58 | $ | 8 | $ | (59 | ) | (51 | ) | ||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 120 | (35 | ) | 85 | 188 | (271 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 147 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 143 | $ | 196 | $ | (330 | ) | (134 | ) | |||||
Trading account liabilities(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 11 | $ | 33 | $ | 44 | $ | 45 | $ | (7 | ) | 38 | |||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (1 | ) | — | (1 | ) | 3 | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | 10 | $ | 33 | $ | 43 | $ | 48 | $ | (11 | ) | 37 | |||||||
Short-term borrowings | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (44 | ) | $ | 21 | $ | (23 | ) | $ | (21 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | (28 | ) | |||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 13 | (51 | ) | (38 | ) | (5 | ) | (67 | ) | (72 | ) | ||||||||
Total | $ | (31 | ) | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (61 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | $ | (74 | ) | (100 | ) | ||
Long-term debt | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (43 | ) | $ | 49 | $ | 6 | $ | 740 | $ | (156 | ) | 584 | ||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (22 | ) | 23 | 1 | (54 | ) | 8 | (46 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | (65 | ) | $ | 72 | $ | 7 | $ | 686 | $ | (148 | ) | 538 | ||||||
Total interest expense | $ | 48 | $ | 40 | $ | 88 | $ | 1,083 | $ | (1,546 | ) | (463 | ) | ||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | (460 | ) | $ | (62 | ) | $ | (522 | ) | $ | 873 | $ | 337 | 1,210 | |||||
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE, INTEREST EXPENSE, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)
| Six Months 2009 vs. Six Months 2008 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | ||||||||
In millions of dollars | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change(2) | |||||||
Deposits at interest with banks(4) | $ | 1,195 | $ | (1,919 | ) | $ | (724 | ) | ||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (702 | ) | $ | (1,305 | ) | $ | (2,007 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (546 | ) | (1,304 | ) | (1,850 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | (1,248 | ) | $ | (2,609 | ) | $ | (3,857 | ) | |
Trading account assets(5) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (2,862 | ) | $ | (252 | ) | $ | (3,114 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (892 | ) | 453 | (439 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | (3,754 | ) | $ | 201 | $ | (3,553 | ) | ||
Investments(1) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 397 | $ | 541 | $ | 938 | ||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 392 | 46 | 438 | |||||||
Total | $ | 789 | $ | 587 | $ | 1,376 | ||||
Loans—consumer | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (1,356 | ) | $ | (1,341 | ) | $ | (2,697 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (1,392 | ) | (1,280 | ) | (2,672 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | (2,748 | ) | $ | (2,621 | ) | $ | (5,369 | ) | |
Loans—corporate | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 89 | $ | (216 | ) | $ | (127 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (1,504 | ) | (571 | ) | (2,075 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | (1,415 | ) | $ | (787 | ) | $ | (2,202 | ) | |
Total loans | $ | (4,163 | ) | $ | (3,408 | ) | $ | (7,571 | ) | |
Other interest-earning assets | $ | (852 | ) | $ | (1,063 | ) | $ | (1,915 | ) | |
Total interest revenue | $ | (8,033 | ) | $ | (8,211 | ) | $ | (16,244 | ) | |
Deposits | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 2 | $ | (790 | ) | $ | (788 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (1,136 | ) | (3,664 | ) | (4,800 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | (1,134 | ) | $ | (4,454 | ) | $ | (5,588 | ) | |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (775 | ) | $ | (1,955 | ) | $ | (2,730 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (855 | ) | (1,218 | ) | (2,073 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | (1,630 | ) | $ | (3,173 | ) | $ | (4,803 | ) | |
Trading account liabilities(5) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (207 | ) | $ | (333 | ) | $ | (540 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (24 | ) | (38 | ) | (62 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | (231 | ) | $ | (371 | ) | $ | (602 | ) | |
Short-term borrowings | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (195 | ) | $ | (1,195 | ) | $ | (1,390 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (136 | ) | (5 | ) | (141 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | (331 | ) | $ | (1,200 | ) | $ | (1,531 | ) | |
Long-term debt | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (106 | ) | $ | (1,932 | ) | $ | (2,038 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (151 | ) | (212 | ) | (363 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | (257 | ) | $ | (2,144 | ) | $ | (2,401 | ) | |
Total interest expense | $ | (3,583 | ) | $ | (11,342 | ) | $ | (14,925 | ) | |
Net interest revenue | $ | (4,450 | ) | $ | 3,131 | $ | (1,319 | ) | ||
| Six Months 2010 vs. Six Months 2009 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | ||||||||
In millions of dollars | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change(2) | |||||||
Deposits at interest with banks(4) | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (225 | ) | $ | (232 | ) | |
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 295 | $ | (437 | ) | $ | (142 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 211 | (215 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 506 | $ | (652 | ) | $ | (146 | ) | ||
Trading account assets(5) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (247 | ) | $ | (1,434 | ) | $ | (1,681 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 559 | (867 | ) | (308 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 312 | $ | (2,301 | ) | $ | (1,989 | ) | ||
Investments(1) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 704 | $ | (1,163 | ) | $ | (459 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 695 | (752 | ) | (57 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 1,399 | $ | (1,915 | ) | $ | (516 | ) | ||
Loans (net of unearned income)(6) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 2,743 | $ | 2,836 | $ | 5,579 | ||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (735 | ) | (727 | ) | (1,462 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | 2,008 | $ | 2,109 | $ | 4,117 | ||||
Other interest-earning assets | $ | (48 | ) | $ | (169 | ) | $ | (217 | ) | |
Total interest revenue | $ | 4,170 | $ | (3,153 | ) | $ | 1,017 | |||
Deposits | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 48 | $ | (1,212 | ) | $ | (1,164 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 438 | (846 | ) | (408 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 486 | $ | (2,058 | ) | $ | (1,572 | ) | ||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (55 | ) | $ | (133 | ) | $ | (188 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 317 | (712 | ) | (395 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 262 | $ | (845 | ) | $ | (583 | ) | ||
Trading account liabilities(5) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 79 | $ | (90 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 10 | (7 | ) | 3 | ||||||
Total | $ | 89 | $ | (97 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | ||
Short-term borrowings | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (19 | ) | $ | (172 | ) | $ | (191 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (24 | ) | (72 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | (43 | ) | $ | (244 | ) | $ | (287 | ) | |
Long-term debt | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 1,447 | $ | (678 | ) | $ | 769 | |||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (123 | ) | (24 | ) | (147 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | 1,324 | $ | (702 | ) | $ | 622 | |||
Total interest expense | $ | 2,118 | $ | (3,946 | ) | $ | (1,828 | ) | ||
Net interest revenue | $ | 2,052 | $ | 793 | $ | 2,845 | ||||
The table below shows all countries where total Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) cross-border outstandings exceed 0.75% of total Citigroup assets:
| Cross-Border Claims on Third Parties | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of U.S. dollars | Banks | Public | Private | Total | Trading and Short-Term Claims | Investments in and Funding of Local Franchises | Total Cross-Border Outstandings | Commitments | Total Cross-Border Outstandings | Commitments | |||||||||||||||||||||
France | $ | 10.8 | $ | 11.3 | $ | 12.1 | $ | 34.2 | $ | 26.0 | $ | 2.6 | $ | 36.8 | $ | 62.4 | $ | 33.0 | $ | 68.5 | |||||||||||
Germany | 13.7 | 6.5 | 6.1 | 26.3 | 21.9 | 6.8 | 33.1 | 62.8 | 30.2 | 53.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
India | 1.8 | 0.4 | 6.2 | 8.4 | 6.0 | 17.1 | 25.5 | 1.9 | 24.9 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cayman Islands | 0.3 | 0.7 | 20.6 | 21.6 | 20.9 | — | 21.6 | 4.7 | 18.0 | 6.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 10.9 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 19.9 | 17.8 | — | 19.9 | 142.5 | 17.1 | 138.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
South Korea | 1.7 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 11.4 | 16.4 | 15.1 | 17.4 | 14.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico | 2.0 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 6.9 | 4.4 | 8.4 | 15.3 | 21.7 | 12.8 | 21.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Netherlands | 4.6 | 2.7 | 8.0 | 15.3 | 9.7 | — | 15.3 | 45.2 | 20.3 | 65.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Italy | 1.1 | 9.4 | 2.4 | 12.9 | 11.2 | 0.9 | 13.8 | 16.4 | 21.7 | 21.2 |
Venezuelan Operations
In 2003, the Venezuelan government enacted currency restrictions that have restricted Citigroup's ability to obtain U.S. dollars in Venezuela at the official foreign currency rate. In May 2010, the government enacted new laws that have closed the parallel foreign exchange market and established a new foreign exchange market. Citigroup does not have access to U.S. dollars in this new market. Citigroup uses the official rate to re-measure the foreign currency transactions in the financial statements of its Venezuelan operations, which have U.S. dollar functional currencies, into U.S. dollars. At June 30, 2010, Citigroup had net monetary assets in its Venezuelan operations denominated in bolivars of approximately $200 million.
CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITYDERIVATIVES
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview
Capital is generally generated by earnings from operating businesses. This is augmented through issuances of common stock, convertible preferred stock, preferred stock, subordinated debt underlying trust preferred securities, and equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans. Capital is used primarily to support assets in the Company's businesses and to absorb expected and unexpected market, credit, or operational losses. The Company's potential further uses of capital, particularly to pay dividends and repurchase common stock, became severely restricted during the latter half of 2008 and during 2009, to date, as explained more fully in the Company's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and as discussed in this MD&A.
Citigroup's capital management framework is designed to ensure that Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with the Company's risk profile, all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines, and external rating agency considerations. The capital management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is reviewed at the consolidated, legal entity, and country level.
Senior management oversees the capital management process of Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries mainly through Citigroup's Finance and Asset and Liability Committee (FinALCO). The Committee is composed of the senior-most management of Citigroup for the purpose of engaging management in decision-making and related discussions on capital and liquidity matters. Among other things, the Committee's responsibilities include: determining the financial structure of Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries; ensuring that Citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized; determining appropriate asset levels and return hurdles for Citigroup and individual businesses; reviewing the funding and capital markets plan for Citigroup; and monitoring interest-rate risk, corporate and bank liquidity and the impact of currency translation on non-U.S. earnings and capital.
Certain of the capital measures discussed in this section, including Tier 1 Common, Tangible Common Equity (TCE) and related ratios, are non-GAAP financial measures. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" and "Tangible Common Equity" below for additional information on these measures, including a reconciliation of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
Exchange Offers
Upon completion of the public and private exchange offers (see "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above), an aggregate of approximately $58 billion in aggregate liquidation value of outstanding preferred stock and trust preferred securities, including an aggregate $25 billion liquidation value of preferred stock held by the UST, was exchanged for Citigroup common stock and/or interim securities convertible into Citi common stock. In addition, an additional approximately $27.1 billion in aggregate liquidation value of preferred stock held by the USG was exchanged for newly issued 8% trust preferred securities. As a result of these exchanges, Citigroup's Tier 1 Common will increase by approximately $64 billion and its Tier 1 Common ratio will increase to approximately 9%, each based on June 30, 2009 levels. In addition, the Company's TCE will increase by approximately $60 billion to approximately $100 billion. See "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" and "Subsequent Events" above for an additional discussion of the capital impact of the exchange offers on Citi.
Future business results of the Company, including events such as corporate dispositions, will continue to affect the Company's capital levels. Moreover, changes that the FASB has adopted regarding off-balance sheet assets, consolidation and sale treatment will have an incremental impact on Citi's capital ratios. For more information on this, see Note 1 "Future Application of Accounting Standards" and Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements including "Funding, Liquidity Facilitiesfor a discussion and Subordinate Interests."disclosures related to Citigroup's derivative activities. The following discussions relate to the Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives and Credit Derivatives activities.
Capital Ratios
Citigroup is subject to the risk-based capital guidelines issued by the Federal Reserve Board (FRB). CapitalBoard. Historically, capital adequacy ishas been measured, in part, based on two risk-based capital ratios, the Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) ratios. Tier 1 Capital consists of corethe sum of "core capital whileelements," such as qualifying common stockholders' equity, as adjusted, qualifying noncontrolling interests, and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts, principally reduced by goodwill, other disallowed intangible assets, and disallowed deferred tax assets. Total Capital also includes other items"supplementary" Tier 2 Capital elements, such as qualifying subordinated debt and a limited portion of the allowance for credit losses. Both measures of capital adequacy are stated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets.
In 2009, the U.S. banking regulators developed a new measure of capital termed "Tier 1 Common," which is defined as Tier 1 Capital less non-common elements, including qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests, and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts. Tier 1 Common and related capital adequacy ratios are measures used and relied upon by U.S. banking regulators; however, they are non-GAAP financial measures for SEC purposes. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.
Citigroup's risk-weighted assets are principally derived from application of the risk-based capital guidelines related to the measurement of credit risk, under which on-balance sheetrisk. Pursuant to these guidelines, on-balance-sheet assets and the credit equivalent amount of certain off-balance sheetoff-balance-sheet exposures (such as financial guarantees, unfunded lending commitments, letters of credit, and derivatives) are assigned to one of several prescribed risk weightrisk-weight categories based upon the perceived credit risk associated with the obligor, or if relevant, the guarantor, the nature of the collateral, or external credit ratings. Risk-weighted assets also incorporate a measure for market risk on covered trading account positions and all foreign exchange and commodity positions whether or not carried in the trading account. Excluded from risk-weighted assets are any assets, such as goodwill and deferred tax assets, to the extent required to be deducted from regulatory capital. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.
Citigroup is also subject to a Leverage ratio requirement, a non-risk-based measure of capital adequacy, which is defined as Tier 1 Capital as a percentage of quarterly adjusted average total assets.
To be "well capitalized" under current federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a bank holding company must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital ratio of at least 10%, and a Leverage Ratioratio of at least 3%, and not be subject to an FRBa Federal Reserve Board directive to maintain higher capital levels. As noted in the table below, Citigroup was "well capitalized" under these federal bank regulatory agency definitions as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
In addition, in conjunction with the conclusion of the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), the results of which were released by the USG on May 7, 2009, the banking regulators developed a new measure of capital called Tier 1 Common defined as Tier 1 Capital less non-common elements including qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts.
The following table sets forth Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios as of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008.2009, respectively.
Citigroup Regulatory Capital Ratios
| Jun. 30, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Common | 2.75 | % | 2.30 | % | |||
Tier 1 Capital | 12.74 | 11.92 | |||||
Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2) | 16.62 | 15.70 | |||||
Leverage(1) | 6.92 | 6.08 | |||||
| Jun. 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Common | 9.71 | % | 9.60 | % | |||
Tier 1 Capital | 11.99 | 11.67 | |||||
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) | 15.59 | 15.25 | |||||
Leverage | 6.31 | 6.87 | |||||
Table As noted in the table above, Citigroup was "well capitalized" under the federal bank regulatory agency definitions as of ContentsJune 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines
In millions of dollars | Jun. 30, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008(1) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Common | ||||||||
Citigroup common stockholders' equity | $ | 78,001 | $ | 70,966 | ||||
Less: Net unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale, net of tax(2) | (7,055 | ) | (9,647 | ) | ||||
Less: Accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax | (3,665 | ) | (5,189 | ) | ||||
Less: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax(3) | (2,611 | ) | (2,615 | ) | ||||
Less: Cumulative effect included in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to the change in own credit worthiness, net of tax(4) | 2,496 | 3,391 | ||||||
Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets(5) | 24,448 | 23,520 | ||||||
Less: Intangible assets: | ||||||||
Goodwill(6) | 26,111 | 27,132 | ||||||
Other disallowed intangible assets(6) | 10,023 | 10,607 | ||||||
Other | (893 | ) | (840 | ) | ||||
Total Tier 1 Common | $ | 27,361 | $ | 22,927 | ||||
Qualifying perpetual preferred stock | $ | 74,301 | $ | 70,664 | ||||
Qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts | 24,034 | 23,899 | ||||||
Qualifying noncontrolling interests | 1,082 | 1,268 | ||||||
Total Tier 1 Capital | $ | 126,778 | $ | 118,758 | ||||
Tier 2 Capital | ||||||||
Allowance for credit losses(7) | $ | 12,769 | $ | 12,806 | ||||
Qualifying subordinated debt(8) | 25,208 | 24,791 | ||||||
Net unrealized pretax gains on available-for- sale equity securities(2) | 669 | 43 | ||||||
Total Tier 2 Capital | $ | 38,646 | $ | 37,640 | ||||
Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2) | $ | 165,424 | $ | 156,398 | ||||
Risk-Weighted Assets(9) | $ | 995,414 | $ | 996,247 | ||||
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Common | ||||||||
Citigroup common stockholders' equity | $ | 154,494 | $ | 152,388 | ||||
Less: Net unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale, net of tax(1) | (2,259 | ) | (4,347 | ) | ||||
Less: Accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax | (3,184 | ) | (3,182 | ) | ||||
Less: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax(2) | (3,465 | ) | (3,461 | ) | ||||
Less: Cumulative effect included in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to the change in own credit worthiness, net of tax(3) | 973 | 760 | ||||||
Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets(4) | 31,493 | 26,044 | ||||||
Less: Intangible assets: | ||||||||
Goodwill | 25,213 | 25,392 | ||||||
Other disallowed intangible assets | 5,393 | 5,899 | ||||||
Other | (776 | ) | (788 | ) | ||||
Total Tier 1 Common | $ | 99,554 | $ | 104,495 | ||||
Qualifying perpetual preferred stock | $ | 312 | $ | 312 | ||||
Qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts | 20,091 | 19,217 | ||||||
Qualifying noncontrolling interests | 1,077 | 1,135 | ||||||
Other | 1,875 | 1,875 | ||||||
Total Tier 1 Capital | $ | 122,909 | $ | 127,034 | ||||
Tier 2 Capital | ||||||||
Allowance for credit losses(5) | $ | 13,275 | $ | 13,934 | ||||
Qualifying subordinated debt(6) | 22,825 | 24,242 | ||||||
Net unrealized pretax gains on available-for-sale equity securities(1) | 743 | 773 | ||||||
Total Tier 2 Capital | $ | 36,843 | $ | 38,949 | ||||
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital) | $ | 159,752 | $ | 165,983 | ||||
Risk-weighted assets(7) | $ | 1,024,929 | $ | 1,088,526 | ||||
Recent Actions Impacting Citigroup's Risk-Weighted Assets
All three of Citigroups's primary credit card securitization trusts—Master Trust, Omni Trust and Broadway Trust—had bonds placed on ratings watch with negative implications by rating agencies during the first and second quarters of 2009. As a result of the ratings watch status, certain actions were taken by Citi with respect to each of the trusts. In general, the actions subordinated certain senior interests in the trust assets that were retained by Citi, which effectively placed these interests below investor interests in terms of priority of payment.
With respect to the Master Trust, in the first quarter of 2009, Citi subordinated a portion of its "seller's interest", which represents a senior interest in trust receivables, thus making those cash flows available to pay investor coupon each month. In addition, during the second quarter of 2009, a subordinated note with a $3 billion principal amount was issued by the Master Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The note is classified as a held-to-maturity investment security.
With respect to the Omni Trust, in the second quarter of 2009, subordinated notes with a principal amount of $2 billion were issued by the trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The notes are classified as Trading account assets. These notes are in addition to a $265 million subordinated note issued by Omni Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. in the fourth quarter of 2008 for the same purpose of providing additional credit support for senior noteholders.
With respect to the Broadway Trust, subordinated notes with a principal amount of $82 million were issued by the trust and retained by Citibank, N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The notes are classified as Trading account assets.
As a result of these actions, based on the applicable regulatory capital rules, Citigroup included the sold assets of the Master and Omni Trusts (commencing with the first quarter of 2009) and the Broadway Trust (commencing with the second quarter of 2009) in its risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating its risk-based capital ratios. The effect of this change increased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by approximately $82 billion, and decreased Citigroup's Tier 1 Capital ratio by approximately 100 bps, each as of March 31, 2009, with respect to the Master and Omni Trusts. The inclusion of the Broadway Trust increased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by an additional approximately $900 million at June 30, 2009. All bond ratings for each of the trusts have been
affirmed by the rating agencies,Adoption of SFAS 166/167 Impact on Capital
The adoption of SFAS 166/167 had a significant and no downgrades occurredimmediate impact on Citigroup's capital ratios as of June 30, 2009.January 1, 2010.
As described further in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the adoption of SFAS 166/167 resulted in the consolidation of $137 billion of incremental assets and $146 billion of liabilities onto Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet, including securitized credit card receivables on the date of adoption, January 1, 2010. The adoption of SFAS 166/167 also resulted in a net increase of $10 billion in risk-weighted assets. In addition, Citi added $13.4 billion to the loan loss allowance, increased deferred tax assets by $5.0 billion, and reduced retained earnings by $8.4 billion. This translated into a reduction in Tangible Common Equity of $8.4 billion, and a decrease in Tier 1 Common, Tier 1 Capital, and Total Capital of $14.2 billion, $14.2 billion and $14.0 billion, respectively, which were partially offset by net income of $4.4 billion and $2.3 billion of qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts issued during the first quarter of 2010.
The impact on Citigroup's capital ratios from the January 1, 2010 adoption of SFAS 166/167 was as follows:
As of January 1, 2010 | Impact | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Common | (138 | ) bps | ||
Tier 1 Capital | (141 | ) bps | ||
Total Capital | (142 | ) bps | ||
Leverage | (118 | ) bps | ||
TCE (TCE/RWA) | (87 | ) bps |
For more information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements below.
Common Stockholders' Equity
Citigroup's common stockholders' equity increased during the six months ended June 30, 2010 by approximately $7.0$2.1 billion to $78$154.5 billion, and represented 4.2%8.0% of total assets as of June 30, 2009, from $712010. Citigroup's common stockholders' equity was $152.4 billion, and 3.7%which represented 8.2% of total assets, at December 31, 2008.2009.
The table below summarizes the change in Citigroup's common stockholders' equity during the first six months of 2009:2010:
In billions of dollars | | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Common equity, December 31, 2008 | $ | 71.0 | ||
Net income | 5.9 | |||
Employee benefit plans and other activities | 0.1 | |||
Dividends | (2.6 | ) | ||
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | 3.6 | |||
Common equity, June 30, 2009 | $ | 78.0 | ||
In billions of dollars | | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Common stockholders' equity, December 31, 2009 | $ | 152.4 | ||
Transition adjustment to retained earnings associated with the adoption of SFAS 166/167 (as of January 1, 2010) | (8.4 | ) | ||
Net income | 7.1 | |||
Employee benefit plans and other activities | 1.7 | |||
ADIA Upper DECs equity units purchase contract | 1.9 | |||
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (0.2 | ) | ||
Common stockholders' equity, June 30, 2010 | $ | 154.5 | ||
As of June 30, 2009,2010, $6.7 billion of stock repurchases remained under Citi's authorized repurchase programs after noprograms. No material repurchases were made in 2008 and the first six months of 2010, or the year ended December 31, 2009. Under various of its agreements with the USG, the Company is restricted from repurchasing common stock, subject to certain exceptions, including in the ordinary course of business as part of employee benefit programs. In addition, in accordance with its recent exchange agreements with the USG, Citigroup agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $0.01 per share per quarter forFor so long as the USGU.S. government holds any debtCitigroup common stock or trust preferred securities, Citigroup has generally agreed not to acquire, repurchase or redeem any Citigroup equity security of Citigroup (or any affiliate thereof) acquired by the USG in connectionor trust preferred securities, other than pursuant to administering its employee benefit plans or other customary exceptions, or with the public and private exchange offers (without the consent of the USG). See "Events in 2009—Public and Private Exchange Offers" above. Any such dividend on Citi's outstanding common stock would need to be made in compliance with Citi's obligations to any remaining outstanding preferred stock.U.S. government.
Tangible Common Equity (TCE)
Citigroup's management believes TCE is useful because it is a measure utilized by regulators and market analysts in evaluating a company's financial condition and capital strength. TCE, as defined by Citigroup, representsCommon equity lessGoodwill andIntangible assets (excluding MSRsother than Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs)), net of therelated net deferred tax liabilities.taxes. Other companies may calculate TCE in a manner different from that of Citigroup. Citi's TCE was $40.0$121.3 billion at June 30, 20092010 and $31.1$118.2 billion at December 31, 2008.2009.
The TCE ratio (TCE divided by risk-weighted assets, see "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" above)assets) was 4.0%11.8% at June 30, 20092010 and 3.1%10.9% at December 31, 2008.2009.
TCE is a capital adequacy metric used and relied upon by industry analysts; however, it is a non-GAAP financial measure for SEC purposes. A reconciliation of Citigroup's total stockholders' equity to TCE follows:
In millions of dollars, except ratio | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Citigroup Stockholders' Equity | $ | 152,302 | $ | 141,630 | |||||
Less: | |||||||||
Preferred Stock | 74,301 | 70,664 | |||||||
Common Equity | $ | 78,001 | $ | 70,966 | |||||
Less: | |||||||||
Goodwill—as reported | 25,578 | 27,132 | |||||||
Intangible Assets (other than MSRs)—as reported | 10,098 | 14,159 | |||||||
Goodwill and Intangible Assets—recorded as Assets of Discontinued Operations Held for Sale | 3,618 | — | |||||||
Less: Related Net Deferred Tax Liabilities | 1,296 | 1,382 | |||||||
Tangible Common Equity (TCE) | $ | 40,003 | $ | 31,057 | |||||
Tangible Assets | |||||||||
GAAP Assets | $ | 1,848,533 | $ | 1,938,470 | |||||
Less: | |||||||||
Goodwill—as reported | 25,578 | 27,132 | |||||||
Intangible Assets (other than MSRs)—as reported | 10,098 | 14,159 | |||||||
Goodwill and Intangible Assets— recorded as Assets of Discontinued Operations Held for Sale | 3,618 | — | |||||||
Related deferred tax assets | 1,283 | 1,285 | |||||||
Tangible Assets (TA)(1) | $ | 1,807,956 | $ | 1,895,894 | |||||
Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) under"Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" | $ | 995,414 | $ | 996,247 | |||||
TCE/TA RATIO | 2.2 | % | 1.6 | % | |||||
TCE RATIO (TCE/RWA) | 4.0 | % | 3.1 | % | |||||
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Citigroup stockholders' equity | $ | 154,806 | $ | 152,700 | |||||
Less: | |||||||||
Preferred stock | 312 | 312 | |||||||
Common equity | $ | 154,494 | $ | 152,388 | |||||
Less: | |||||||||
Goodwill | 25,201 | 25,392 | |||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs) | 7,868 | 8,714 | |||||||
Goodwill-recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets | 12 | — | |||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs)— recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets | 54 | — | |||||||
Related net deferred tax assets | 62 | 68 | |||||||
Tangible common equity (TCE) | $ | 121,297 | $ | 118,214 | |||||
Tangible assets | |||||||||
GAAP assets | $ | 1,937,656 | $ | 1,856,646 | |||||
Less: | |||||||||
Goodwill | 25,201 | 25,392 | |||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs) | 7,868 | 8,714 | |||||||
Goodwill-recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets | 12 | — | |||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs)— recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets | 54 | — | |||||||
Related deferred tax assets | 365 | 386 | |||||||
Federal bank regulatory reclassification | — | 5,746 | |||||||
Tangible assets (TA) | $ | 1,904,156 | $ | 1,827,900 | |||||
Risk-weighted assets (RWA) | $ | 1,024,929 | $ | 1,088,526 | |||||
TCE/TA ratio | 6.37 | % | 6.47 | % | |||||
TCE/RWA ratio | 11.83 | % | 10.86 | % | |||||
Capital Resources of Citigroup's Depository Institutions
Citigroup's U.S. subsidiary depository institutions in the U.S. are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the FRB's guidelines.guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board. To be "well capitalized" under federal bankcurrent regulatory agency definitions, Citigroup's depository institutions must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) ratio of at least 10%, and a Leverage ratio of at least 5%, and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels.
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, all of Citigroup's U.S. subsidiary depository institutions were "well capitalized" under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, including Citigroup's primary depository institution, Citibank, N.A., as noted in the following table:
Citibank, N.A. Components of Capital and Ratios Under Regulatory Guidelines
In billions of dollars | Jun. 30, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Capital | $ | 94.3 | $ | 71.0 | |||
Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2) | 112.5 | 108.4 | |||||
Tier 1 Capital Ratio | 14.58 | % | 9.94 | % | |||
Total Capital Ratio (Tier 1 and Tier 2) | 17.40 | 15.18 | |||||
Leverage Ratio(1) | 8.23 | 5.82 | |||||
In billions of dollars | Jun. 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tier 1 Capital | $ | 101.1 | $ | 96.8 | |||
Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) | 114.6 | 110.6 | |||||
Tier 1 Capital ratio | 14.16 | % | 13.16 | % | |||
Total Capital ratio | 16.04 | 15.03 | |||||
Leverage ratio(1) | 8.90 | 8.31 | |||||
Citibank, N.A. had a net lossSimilar to pending changes to capital standards applicable to Citigroup and its broker-dealer subsidiaries, as discussed below, the capital requirements applicable to Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions may be subject to change in light of $1.5 billion foractions currently being considered at both the first six months of 2009.legislative and regulatory levels.
There are various legal and regulatory limitations on the ability of Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions to pay dividends, extend credit or otherwise supply funds to Citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries. In addition,determining the declaration of dividends, each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and Leverage ratio requirements, as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Citigroup did not receive any dividends from its bank subsidiaries during the first six months of 2009, Citibank, N.A. received capital contributions from its parent company of $27.5 billion.
Total subordinated notes issued to Citicorp Holdings Inc. that were outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, and included in Citibank, N.A.'s Tier 2 Capital, amounted to $9.5 billion and $28.2 billion, respectively, reflecting the redemption of $18.7 billion of subordinated notes in the first six months of 2009.
The significant events in the latter half of 2008 and the first six months of 2009 impacting the capital of Citigroup also affected, or could affect, Citibank, N.A. Citibank, N.A. is subject to separate banking regulation and examination.2010.
The following table presents the estimated sensitivity of Citigroup's and Citibank, N.A.'s capital ratios to changes of $100 million ofin Tier 1 Common, Tier 1 Capital, or Total Capital (numerator), or changes of $1 billion in risk-weighted assets or adjusted average total assets (denominator) based on financial information as of June 30, 2009.2010. This information is provided solely for the purpose of analyzing the impact that a change in the Company'sCitigroup's or Citibank, N.A.'s financial position or results of operations could have on these ratios. These sensitivities only consider a single change to either a component of capital, risk-weighted assets, or adjusted average total assets. Accordingly, an event that affects more than one factor may have a larger basis-pointbasis point impact than is reflected in this table.
| Tier 1 Common | Tier 1 Capital | Total Capital | Leverage | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impact of $100 change in Tier 1 Common | Impact of $1 change in risk-weighted assets | Impact of $100 | change in Tier 1 Capital | Impact of $1 risk-weighted assets | Impact of $100 million change in Total Capital | Impact of $1 billion change in risk-weighted assets | Impact of $100 million change in Tier 1 Capital | Impact of $1 billion change in adjusted average total assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citigroup | 1.0 bps | 1.0 bps | 1.0 bps | 0.5 bps | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citibank, N.A. | — | — | 0.9 bps | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Broker-Dealer Subsidiaries
At June 30, 2009,2010, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., a broker-dealer registered with the SEC that is an indirect wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), had net capital, computed in accordance with the SEC's net capital rule, of $8.1$8.3 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement by $7.5$7.6 billion.
In addition, certain of the Company'sCiti's broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to regulation in the other countries in which they do business, including requirements to maintain specified levels of net capital or its equivalent. The Company'sCitigroup's broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with their capital requirements at June 30, 2009. The2010.
Similar to pending changes to capital standards applicable to Citigroup, as discussed under "Regulatory Capital Standards Developments" below, net capital requirements applicable to these subsidariesCitigroup's broker-dealer subsidiaries in the U.S. and in particular other jurisdictions aremay be subject to political debate and potential change in light of recent events.the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Financial Reform Act) and other actions currently being considered at both the legislative and regulatory levels. Citi continues to monitor these developments closely.
Regulatory Capital Standards Developments
Citigroup supportsThe prospective regulatory capital standards for financial institutions are currently subject to significant debate, rulemaking activity and uncertainty, both in the moveU.S. as well as internationally. Citi continues to monitor these developments closely.
Basel II and III. In late 2005, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee) published a new set of risk-based capital standards published on June 26, 2004 (and subsequently amended in November 2005) by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, consisting of central(Basel II) which would permit banks, and bank supervisors from 13 countries. The international version of the Basel II framework will allowincluding Citigroup, to leverage internal risk models used to measure credit, operational, and market risk exposures to drive regulatory capital calculations.
On December 7, In late 2007, the U.S. banking regulators published the rulesadopted these standards for large banks, to comply with Basel II inincluding Citigroup. As adopted, the U.S. These rulesstandards require Citigroup, as a large and internationally active bank, to comply with the most advanced Basel II approaches for calculating credit and operational risk capital requirements.requirements, which could result in a need for Citigroup to hold additional regulatory capital. The U.S. implementation timetable consists of a parallel calculation period under the current regulatory capital regime (Basel I) and Basel II starting anytime between April 1, 2008, and April 1, 2010 followed by a three-year transition period, typically starting 12 months after the beginningtransitional period.
Citi began parallel reporting on April 1, 2010. There will be at least four quarters of parallel reporting. Thereporting before Citi enters the three-year transitional period. U.S. regulators have reserved the right to change how Basel II is applied in the U.S. following a review at the end of the second year of the transitional period, and to retain the existing prompt corrective action and leverage capital requirements applicable to banking organizations in the U.S.
The Company Citigroup intends to implement Basel II within the timeframe required by the U.S. regulators.
Separate from the Basel II rules for credit and operational risk discussed above, the Basel Committee has proposed revisions to the market risk framework that could also lead to additional capital requirements (Basel III). Although not yet ratified by the Basel Committee or U.S. regulators, the Basel III final rules.rules for capital, leverage and liquidity (Basel III introduces new global standards and ratios for liquidity risk measurement) are currently expected to be published by January 2011, one quarter ahead of Citigroup's earliest date for Basel II implementation for credit and operational risk.
Financial Reform Act. In addition to the implementation of Basel II and Basel III, the Financial Reform Act grants new regulatory authority to various U.S. federal regulators, including the Federal Reserve Board and a newly created Financial Stability Oversight Council (Oversight Council), to impose heightened prudential standards on financial institutions such as Citigroup. These standards could include heightened capital, leverage and liquidity standards, as well as requirements for periodic stress tests. The Federal Reserve Board will also have discretion to impose other prudential standards, including contingent capital requirements, and will retain important flexibility to distinguish among bank holding companies such as Citigroup based on their perceived riskiness, complexity, activities, size and other factors.
In addition, the so-called "Collins Amendment" to the Financial Reform Act will result in new minimum capital requirements for bank holding companies such as Citigroup, and could require Citigroup to replace certain of its outstanding securities that are currently counted towards Citi's Tier 1 Capital requirements, such as trust preferred securities, over a period of time.
OverviewGeneral
Because Citigroup is a bank holding company, substantially all of its net earningsCitigroup's cash flows and liquidity needs are primarily generated within its operating subsidiaries. These subsidiariesExceptions exist for major corporate items, such as equity and certain long-term debt issuances, which take place at the Citigroup corporate level. Generally, Citi's management of funding and liquidity is designed to optimize availability of funds as needed within Citi's legal and regulatory structure. Due to various constraints that limit certain Citi subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or otherwise make funds available to Citigroup, primarily(see "Parameters for Intercompany Funding Transfers" below), Citigroup's primary objectives for funding and liquidity management are established by entity and in the form of dividends. Certain subsidiaries' dividend-paying abilities may be limited by covenant restrictions in credit agreements, regulatory requirements and/or rating-agency requirements that also impact their capitalization levels.
As discussed in more detail in the Company's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, global financial markets faced unprecedented disruption in the latter part of 2008. Citigroup and other U.S. financial services firms are currently benefiting from government programs that are improving markets and providing Citigroup and other institutions with significant current funding capacity and significant liquidity support. See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs" above.
In addition to the above programs, since the middle of 2007, the Company has taken a series of actions to reduce potential funding risks related to short-term market dislocations. The amount of commercial paper outstanding was reduced and the weighted-average maturity was extended,aggregate across: (i) the parent company liquidity portfolio (a portfolioholding company/broker dealer subsidiaries; and (ii) bank subsidiaries.
Currently, Citigroup's primary sources of cashfunding include deposits, long-term debt and highly liquid securities)long-term collateralized financing, and broker-dealer "cash box" (unencumbered cash deposits) were increased substantially, and the amount of unsecured overnight bank borrowings was reduced.
As of June 30, 2009, the parent company liquidity portfolio and broker-dealer "cash box" totaled $65.0 billion as compared with $66.8 billion at December 31, 2008 and $64.8 billion at June 30, 2008. In addition, as of June 30, 2009, Citigroup's bank subsidiaries had an aggregate of approximately $110 billion of cash on deposit with major Central Banks (including the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the European Central Bank, Bank of England, Swiss National Bank and Bank of Japan). This compares with approximately $72 billion at December 31, 2008. These amounts are in addition to cash deposited from the broker-dealer "cash box" noted above. Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also have significant additional liquidity resources through unencumbered highly liquidequity, including preferred, trust preferred securities and other assets available for securedcommon stock. This funding through private markets or that are, or could be, pledged to the major Central Banksis supplemented by modest amounts of short-term borrowings.
Citi views its deposit base as its most stable and the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks.
These actions to reducelowest cost funding risks, the reduction of the balance sheet and the substantial support provided by U.S. government programs have allowed the combined parent and broker-dealer entities to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet all maturing unsecured debt obligations due within a one-year time horizon, without accessing the unsecured markets.
Citigroup's funding sources are diversified across funding types and geography, a benefit of its global franchise. Funding for Citigroup and its major operating subsidiaries includessource. Citi has focused on maintaining a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base that stood at approximately $814 billion as of approximately $804.7June 30, 2010, as compared with $828 billion at March 31, 2010 and $836 billion at December 31, 2009. The sequential decline in deposits primarily resulted from FX translation. Excluding FX translation, Citigroup deposits at June 30, 2009. These2010 remained flat as compared with the first quarter of 2010. As stated above, Citigroup's deposits are diversified across products and regions, with approximately two-thirds of them63% outside of the U.S. This diversification provides the Company with an important and low-cost source of funding. A significant portion of these deposits has been, and is currently expected to be, long term and stable, and is considered to be core.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Company's deposit base increased by $42 billion compared to March 31, 2009, approximately half of which was due to FX translation. On a volume basis, deposit increases were noted in Regional Consumer Banking, particularly in North America, and in Global Transaction Services due to growth in all regions and strength in Treasury and Trade Solutions. These increases were partially offset by declines in Securities and Banking related to reduction of higher cost wholesale deposits.
Banking Subsidiaries
There are various legal limitations on the ability of Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions to extend credit, pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to Citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries. Currently, the approval of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, in the case of national banks, or the Office of Thrift Supervision, in the case of federal savings banks, is required if total dividends declared in any calendar year exceed amounts specified by the applicable agency's regulations. State-chartered depository institutions are subject to dividend limitations imposed by applicable state law.
In determining the declaration of dividends, each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements, as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Citigroup did not receive any dividends from its banking subsidiaries during the second quarter of 2009.
Non-Banking Subsidiaries
Citigroup receives dividends from its non-bank subsidiaries. These non-bank subsidiaries, including Citigroup Global Market Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), are generally not subject to regulatory restrictions on dividends. However, the ability of CGMHI to declare dividends can be restricted by capital considerations of its broker-dealer subsidiaries.
CGMHI's consolidated balance sheet is liquid, with the vast majority of its assets consisting of marketable securities and collateralized short-term financing agreements arising from securities transactions. CGMHI monitors and evaluates the adequacy of its capital and borrowing base on a daily basis to maintain liquidity and to ensure that its capital base supports the regulatory capital requirements of its subsidiaries.
Some of Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries, including CGMHI, have credit facilities with Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions, including Citibank, N.A. Borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. There are various legal restrictions on the extent to which a bank holding company and certain of its non-bank subsidiaries can borrow or obtain credit from Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions or engage in certain other transactions with them. In general, these restrictions require that transactions be on arm's length terms and be secured by designated amounts of
specified collateral. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
At June 30, 2009,2010, long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for Citigroup, CGMHI,Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI) and other Citigroup subsidiaries, collectively, were as follows:
In billions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI(1) | CFI(1) | Other Citigroup Subsidiaries | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Long-term debt | $ | 192.3 | $ | 15.1 | $ | 44.1 | $ | 96.5 | (2) | ||||
Commercial paper | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 27.9 | $ | 0.6 | |||||
In billions of dollars | Citigroup Parent Company | Other Non-bank | Bank | Total Citigroup(1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Long-term debt(2) | $ | 189.1 | $ | 75.7 | $ | 148.5 | (3) | $ | 413.3 | ||||
Commercial paper | — | 11.2 | 25.2 | 36.4 |
The $36.4 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of June 30, 2010 reflects the consolidation of VIEs pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 effective January 1, 2010; the $10.2 billion at December 31, 2009 was pre-adoption. The VIE consolidation led to an increase in bank subsidiary commercial paper, while non-bank subsidiarycommercial paper remained at recent levels.
The table below details the long-term debt issuances of Citigroup during the past threefive quarters.
In billions of dollars | 4Q08 | 1Q09 | 2Q09 | Total | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Debt issued under TLGP guarantee | $ | 5.8 | $ | 21.9 | $ | 17.0 | $ | 44.7 | |||||
Debt issued without TLGP guarantee | 0.8 | 2.5 | 17.5 | (1) | 20.8 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 6.6 | $ | 24.4 | $ | 34.5 | $ | 65.5 | |||||
In billions of dollars | 2Q09 | 3Q09 | 4Q09 | 1Q10 | 2Q10 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Debt issued under TLGP guarantee | $ | 17.0 | $ | 10.0 | $ | 10.0 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Debt issued without TLGP guarantee: | |||||||||||||||||
Citigroup parent company/CFI | 7.4 | 12.6 | 4.0 | (3) | 1.3 | 5.0 | (3) | ||||||||||
Other Citigroup subsidiaries | 10.1 | (1) | 7.9 | (2) | 5.8 | (4) | 3.7 | (5) | 0.1 | ||||||||
Total(6) | $ | 34.5 | $ | 30.5 | $ | 19.8 | $ | 5.0 | $ | 5.1 | |||||||
See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs—FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program" regarding FDIC guarantees of certain long-term debt and commercial paper and interbank deposits. See also Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail on Citigroup's (andand its affiliates') long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding.
Structural liquidity, defined as the sum of deposits, long-term debt and stockholders' equity as a percentage of total assets, was 71% at June 30, 2010, unchanged as compared with March 31, 2010 and compared with 67% at June 30, 2009.
In addition, one of Citi's key structural liquidity measures is the cash capital ratio. Cash capital is a broader measure of the ability to fund the structurally illiquid portion of Citigroup's balance sheet than traditional measures, such as deposits to loans or core deposits to loans. Cash capital measures the amount of long-term funding (>1 year) available to fund illiquid assets. Long-term funding includes core customer deposits, long-term debt and equity. Illiquid assets include loans (net of liquidity adjustments), illiquid securities, securities haircuts and other assets (i.e., goodwill, intangibles, fixed assets, receivables, etc.). At June 30, 2010, the combined Citigroup, the parent holding company, and CGMHI, as well as the aggregate bank subsidiaries had an excess of cash capital. In addition, as of June 30, 2010, the combined Citigroup, the parent holding company, and CGMHI maintained liquidity to meet all maturing obligations significantly in excess of a one-year period without access to the unsecured wholesale markets.
Aggregate Liquidity Resources
| Parent & Broker Dealer | Significant Bank Entities | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Jun. 30, 2010 | Mar. 31, 2010 | Jun. 30, 2009 | Jun. 30, 2010 | Mar. 31, 2010 | Jun. 30, 2009 | Jun. 30, 2010 | Mar. 31, 2010 | Jun. 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash at major central banks | $ | 24.7 | $ | 9.5 | $ | 22.5 | $ | 86.0 | $ | 108.9 | $ | 110.0 | $ | 110.7 | $ | 118.4 | $ | 132.5 | ||||||||||
Unencumbered Liquid Securities | 56.8 | 72.8 | 42.5 | 143.4 | 128.7 | 53.3 | 200.2 | 201.5 | 95.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 81.5 | $ | 82.3 | $ | 65.0 | $ | 229.4 | $ | 237.6 | $ | 163.3 | $ | 310.9 | $ | 319.9 | $ | 228.3 | ||||||||||
As noted in the table above, Citigroup's aggregate liquidity resources totaled $310.9 billion as of June 30, 2010, compared with $319.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $228.3 billion at June 30, 2009. Excluding the impact of FX translation, the level of liquidity resources at June 30, 2010 was essentially flat to the prior quarter. These amounts are as of quarter-end, and may increase or decrease intra-quarter and intra-day in the ordinary course of business.
As of June 30, 2010, Citigroup's and its affiliates' liquidity portfolio and broker-dealer "cash box" totaled $81.5 billion, compared with $82.3 billion at March 31, 2010 and $65.0 billion at June 30, 2009. This includes the liquidity portfolio and cash box held in the U.S. as well as government bonds held by Citigroup's broker-dealer entities in the United Kingdom and Japan. Citigroup's bank subsidiaries had an aggregate of approximately $86 billion of cash on deposit with major central banks (including the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the European Central Bank, Bank of England, Swiss National Bank, Bank of Japan, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority), compared with approximately $108.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $110.0 billion at June 30, 2009. These amounts are in addition to cash deposited from the broker-dealer "cash box" noted above.
Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also have significant additional liquidity resources through unencumbered highly liquid securities available for secured funding through private markets or that are, or could be, pledged to the major central banks and the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks. The value of these liquid securities was $143.4 billion at June 30, 2010, compared with $128.7 billion at March 31, 2010 and $53.3 billion at June 30, 2009. Significant amounts of cash and liquid securities are also available in other Citigroup entities.
In addition to the highly liquid securities listed above, Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also maintain additional unencumbered securities and loans which are currently pledged to the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks and U.S. Federal Reserve Banks.
Further, Citigroup, as the parent holding company, can transfer funding, subject to certain legal restrictions, to other affiliated entities, including its bank subsidiaries. Citi's non-bank subsidiaries, such as its broker-dealer subsidiaries, can also transfer excess liquidity to the parent holding company through termination of intercompany borrowings, and to the parent holding company and other affiliates, including Citi's bank subsidiaries. In addition, Citigroup's bank subsidiaries, including Citibank, N.A., can lend to Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. As of June 30, 2010, the amount available for lending under Section 23A was approximately $26 billion, provided the funds are collateralized appropriately.
Funding Outlook
Based on the current status of Citi's aggregate liquidity resources discussed above, as well as Citi's continued deleveraging, stability in its deposit base to date, and its increased structural liquidity over the prior two years, Citi currently expects to refinance only a portion of its long-term debt maturing in 2010. In addition, Citi does not currently expect to refinance its TLGP debt as it matures (as set forth in note 2 of the long-term debt above). However, as part of its efforts to maintain and solidify its structural liquidity, as well as extend the duration of liabilities supporting its businesses, for the full year of 2010, Citi currently expects to issue approximately $18 billion to $21 billion in long-term debt (excluding local country debt) an amount that is $3 billion to $6 billion higher than previously-stated estimates. This $18 billion to $21 billion of expected issuance is less than the $35 billion of expected maturities during the year (excluding local country debt). Citi continues to review its funding and liquidity needs and may adjust its expected issuances for the remainder of 2010 due to market conditions or regulatory requirements, among other factors.
Credit Ratings
Citigroup's ability to access the capital markets and other sources of wholesale funds is currently significantly subject to government funding and liquidity support. Any ability to access the capital markets or other sources of funds, as well as the cost of these funds and its ability to maintain certain deposits, is highly dependent on its credit ratings. The table below indicates the current ratings for Citigroup.
On November 24, 2008, Fitch Ratings lowered Citigroup Inc.'s and Citibank, N.A.'s senior debt rating to "A+" from "AA-." In doing so, Fitch removed the rating from "Watch Negative" and applied a "Stable Outlook."
On February 27, 2009, Moody's Investors Service lowered Citigroup Inc.'s senior debt rating to "A3" from "A2" and Citibank, N.A.'s long-term rating to "A1" from "Aa3." In doing so, Moody's removed the ratings from "Under Review for possible downgrade" and applied a "Stable Outlook."
On December 19, 2008, Standard & Poor's lowered Citigroup Inc.'s senior debt rating to "A" from "AA-" and Citibank, N.A.'s long-term rating to "A+" from "AA." In doing so, Standard & Poor's removed the rating from "CreditWatch Negative" and applied a "Stable Outlook." On December 19, 2008, Standard & Poor's also lowered the short-term and commercial paper ratings of Citigroup and Citibank, N.A. to "A-1" from "A-1+". On February 27, 2009, Standard & Poor's placed the ratings of Citigroup Inc. and its subsidiaries on "Negative Outlook." On May 4, 2009, Standard & Poor's placed the ratings of Citigroup Inc. and its subsidiaries on "Credit Watch Negative." On May 8, 2009, Standard & Poor's affirmed the ratings of Citigroup Inc. and its subsidiaries. In doing so, Standard & Poor's removed the rating from "Credit Watch Negative" and applied a "Stable Outlook."
As a result of the Citigroup guarantee, changes in ratings and ratings outlooks for Citigroup Funding Inc. are the same as those of Citigroup noted above.Citigroup.
Citigroup's Debt Ratings as of June 30, 20092010
| Citigroup Inc. | Citigroup Funding Inc. | Citibank, N.A. | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior debt | Commercial paper | Senior debt | Commercial paper | Long- term | Short- term | ||||||||||
Fitch Ratings | A+ | F1+ | A+ | F1+ | A+ | F1+ | ||||||||||
Moody's Investors Service | A3 | P-1 | A3 | P-1 | A1 | P-1 | ||||||||||
Standard & Poor's (S&P) | A | A-1 | A | A-1 | A+ | A-1 | ||||||||||
The credit rating agencies included in the chart above have each indicated that they are evaluating the impact of the Financial Reform Act on the rating support assumptions currently included in their methodologies as related to large bank holding companies. These evaluations are generally as a result of agencies' belief that the Financial Reform Act increases the uncertainty regarding the U.S. government's willingness to provide extraordinary support to such companies. Consistent with such belief and to bring Citi in line with other large banks, S&P and Moody's revised their outlooks on Citigroup's supported ratings from stable to negative in February and July of 2010, respectively. The credit rating agencies have generally indicated that their evaluations of the impact of the Financial Reform Act could take anywhere from several months to two years. The ultimate timing of the completion of the evaluations, as well as the outcomes, is uncertain.
Ratings downgrades by Fitch Ratings, Moody's Investors Service or Standard & Poor's could have had and could continue to havematerial impacts on funding and liquidity through cash obligations, reduced funding capacity and could also have further explicit impact on liquidity due to collateral triggers and other cash requirements.triggers. Because of the current credit ratings of Citigroup Inc., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating would likelymay or may not impact Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating.rating by one notch. As of June 30, 2009,2010, Citi currently believes that a one-notch downgrade of both the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc. and a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating could result in the assumed loss of unsecured commercial paper ($10.6 billion) and tender option bonds funding ($1.9 billion) as well as derivative triggers and additional margin requirements ($1.0 billion).
Additionally, other funding sources, such as repurchase agreements and other margin requirements for which there are no explicit triggers, could be adversely affected. The aggregate liquidity resources of Citigroup's parent holding company and broker-dealer stood at $83.6 billion as of June 30, 2010, in part as a contingency for such an event, and a broad range of mitigating actions are currently included in the Citigroup Contingency Funding Plan. These mitigating factors include, but are not limited to, accessing funding capacity from existing clients, diversifying funding sources, adjusting the size of select trading books, and tailoring levels of reverse repurchase agreement lending.
Citi currently believes that a more severe ratings downgrade scenario, such as a two-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc., accompanied by a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating, wouldcould result in an approximately $12.2additional $1.6 billion in funding requirement in the form of collateralcash obligations and cash obligations.collateral.
Further, as of June 30, 2009,2010, a one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term ratings of Citibank, N.A. wouldcould result in an approximately $4.2approximate $3.6 billion funding requirement in the form of collateral and cash obligations. Because of the current credit ratings of Citibank, N.A., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating is unlikely to have any impact on its commercial paper/short-term rating. The significant bank entities, Citibank, N.A., and other bank vehicles have aggregate liquidity resources of $229 billion, and have a detailed contingency funding plan that encompasses a broad range of mitigating actions.
LIQUIDITY
Citigroup's liquidity management is structured to optimize the free flow of funds through the Company's legal and regulatory structure. Principal constraints relate to legal and regulatory limitations, sovereign risk and tax considerations. Consistent with these constraints, Citigroup's primary objectives for liquidity management are established by entity and in aggregate across three main operating entities as follows:
Within this construct, there is a funding framework for the Company's activities. The primary benchmark for the Parent and Broker—Dealer Entities is that on a combined basis, Citigroup maintains sufficient liquidity to meet all maturing unsecured debt obligations due within a one-year time horizon without accessing the unsecured markets. The resulting "short-term ratio" is monitored on a daily basis.
Starting in the latter part of 2008, serious credit and other market disruptions caused significant potential constraints on liquidity for financial institutions. Citigroup and other U.S. financial services firms are currently benefiting from government programs that are providing Citigroup and other institutions with significant liquidity support. See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs" above.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance sheetoff-balance-sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs), primarily in connection with securitization activities inRegional Consumer Banking and Local Consumer Lending.Institutional Clients Group. Citigroup and its subsidiaries use SPEs principally to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroup's financial assets, assisting clients in securitizing their financial assets and creating investment products for clients. The adoption of SFAS 166/167, effective on January 1, 2010, caused certain SPEs, including credit card receivables securitization trusts and asset-backed commercial paper conduits, to be consolidated in Citi's Financial Statements. For further information about the Company'son Citi's securitization activities and involvement in SPEs, see Note 15Notes 1 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Citigroup's risk management framework balances strong corporate oversight with well-defined independent risk management functions for each business and region, as well as cross-business product expertise. The Citigroup risk management framework is described in Citigroup's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
During the second quarter of 2010, Citigroup's aggregate loan portfolio decreased by $29.6 billion to $692.2 billion. Citi's total allowance for loan losses totaled $46.2 billion at June 30, 2010, a coverage ratio of 6.72% of total loans, down from 6.80% at March 31, 2010 and up from 5.60% in the second quarter of 2009.
During the second quarter of 2010, Citigroup recorded a net release of $1.5 billion to its credit reserves and allowance for unfunded lending commitments, compared to a $3.9 billion build in the second quarter of 2009. The release consisted of a net release of $683 million for corporate loans ($253 million release inICG and approximately $400 million release inSAP), and a net release of $827 million for consumer loans, mainly for Retail Partner Cards in Citi Holdings,LATAM RCB andAsia RCB (mainly a $412 million release inRCB and a $421 million release inLCL). Despite the reserve release for consumer loans, the coincident months of coverage of the consumer portfolio increased from 15.5 to 15.9 months, significantly higher than the year-ago level of 12.7 months.
Net credit losses of $8.0 billion during the second quarter of 2010 decreased $3.5 billion from year-ago levels (on a managed basis). The decrease consisted of a net decrease of $2.2 billion for consumer loans (mainly a $1.9 billion decrease inLCL and a $321 million decrease inRCB) and a decrease of $1.3 billion for corporate loans ($1.2 billion decrease inSAP and a $126 million decrease inICG).
Consumer non-accrual loans (which excludes credit card receivables) totaled $13.8 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $15.6 billion at March 31, 2010 and $15.8 billion at June 30, 2009. The consumer loan 90 days or more delinquency rate was 3.67% at June 30, 2010, compared to 4.01% at March 31, 2010 and 3.68% a year ago. The 30 to 89 days past due consumer loan delinquency rate was 3.06% at June 30, 2010, compared to 3.19% at March 31, 2010 and 3.41% a year ago. During the second quarter of 2010, both early- and later-stage delinquencies declined across most of the consumer loan portfolios, driven by improvement in North America mortgages. Delinquencies declined in first mortgages, entirely as a result of asset sales and loans moving from the trial period under the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to permanent modification.
Corporate non-accrual loans were $11.0 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $12.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $12.5 billion a year ago. The decrease from the prior quarter was mainly due to loan sales, write-offs and paydowns, which were partially offset by increases due to weakening of certain borrowers.
See below for a discussion of Citi's loan and credit accounting policies.
In millions of dollars at year end | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Consumer loans | |||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage and real estate(1) | $ | 171,102 | $ | 180,334 | $ | 183,842 | $ | 191,748 | $ | 197,358 | |||||||
Installment, revolving credit, and other | 61,867 | 69,111 | 58,099 | 57,820 | 61,645 | ||||||||||||
Cards | 125,337 | 127,818 | 28,951 | 36,039 | 33,750 | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 5,540 | 5,386 | 5,640 | 5,848 | 6,016 | ||||||||||||
Lease financing | 6 | 7 | 11 | 15 | 16 | ||||||||||||
$ | 363,852 | $ | 382,656 | $ | 276,543 | $ | 291,470 | $ | 298,785 | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage and real estate (1) | $ | 47,921 | $ | 49,421 | $ | 47,297 | $ | 47,568 | $ | 45,986 | |||||||
Installment, revolving credit, and other | 38,115 | 44,541 | 42,805 | 45,004 | 45,556 | ||||||||||||
Cards | 37,510 | 38,191 | 41,493 | 41,443 | 42,262 | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | 16,420 | 14,828 | 14,780 | 14,858 | 13,858 | ||||||||||||
Lease financing | 677 | 771 | 331 | 345 | 339 | ||||||||||||
$ | 140,643 | $ | 147,752 | $ | 146,706 | $ | 149,218 | $ | 148,001 | ||||||||
Total consumer loans | $ | 504,495 | $ | 530,408 | $ | 423,249 | $ | 440,688 | $ | 446,786 | |||||||
Unearned income | 951 | 1,061 | 808 | 803 | 866 | ||||||||||||
Consumer loans, net of unearned income | $ | 505,446 | $ | 531,469 | $ | 424,057 | $ | 441,491 | $ | 447,652 | |||||||
Corporate loans | |||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 11,656 | $ | 15,558 | $ | 15,614 | $ | 19,692 | $ | 26,125 | |||||||
Loans to financial institutions | 31,450 | 31,279 | 6,947 | 7,666 | 8,181 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage and real estate (1) | 22,453 | 21,283 | 22,560 | 23,221 | 23,862 | ||||||||||||
Installment, revolving credit, and other | 14,812 | 15,792 | 17,737 | 17,734 | 19,856 | ||||||||||||
Lease financing | 1,244 | 1,239 | 1,297 | 1,275 | 1,284 | ||||||||||||
$ | 81,615 | $ | 85,151 | $ | 64,155 | $ | 69,588 | $ | 79,308 | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | |||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 65,615 | $ | 64,903 | $ | 68,467 | $ | 73,564 | $ | 78,512 | |||||||
Installment, revolving credit, and other | 11,174 | 10,956 | 9,683 | 10,949 | 11,638 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage and real estate (1) | 7,301 | 9,771 | 9,779 | 12,023 | 11,887 | ||||||||||||
Loans to financial institutions | 20,646 | 19,003 | 15,113 | 16,906 | 15,856 | ||||||||||||
Lease financing | 582 | 663 | 1,295 | 1,462 | 1,560 | ||||||||||||
Governments and official institutions | 1,046 | 1,324 | 1,229 | 826 | 713 | ||||||||||||
$ | 106,364 | $ | 106,620 | $ | 105,566 | $ | 115,730 | $ | 120,166 | ||||||||
Total corporate loans | $ | 187,979 | $ | 191,771 | $ | 169,721 | $ | 185,318 | $ | 199,474 | |||||||
Unearned income | (1,259 | ) | (1,436 | ) | (2,274 | ) | (4,598 | ) | (5,436 | ) | |||||||
Corporate loans, net of unearned income | $ | 186,720 | $ | 190,335 | $ | 167,447 | $ | 180,720 | $ | 194,038 | |||||||
Total loans—net of unearned income | $ | 692,166 | $ | 721,804 | $ | 591,504 | $ | 622,211 | $ | 641,690 | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses—on drawn exposures | (46,197 | ) | (48,746 | ) | (36,033 | ) | (36,416 | ) | (35,940 | ) | |||||||
Total loans—net of unearned income and allowance for credit losses | $ | 645,969 | $ | 673,058 | $ | 555,471 | $ | 585,795 | $ | 605,750 | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans—net of unearned income(2) | 6.72 | % | 6.80 | % | 6.09 | % | 5.85 | % | 5.60 | % | |||||||
Allowance for consumer loan losses as a percentage of total consumer loans—net of unearned income(2) | 7.87 | % | 7.84 | % | 6.70 | % | 6.44 | % | 6.25 | % | |||||||
Allowance for corporate loan losses as a percentage of total corporate loans—net of unearned income(2) | 3.59 | % | 3.90 | % | 4.56 | % | 4.42 | % | 4.11 | % | |||||||
Certain lending products included in the loan table above have terms that may give rise to additional credit issues. Credit cards with below-market introductory interest rates, multiple loans supported by the same collateral (e.g., home equity loans), and interest-only loans are examples of such products. However, Citi does not believe these products are material to its financial position and results and are closely managed via credit controls that mitigate the additional inherent risk.
Impaired Loans
Impaired loans are those where Citigroup believes it is probable that it will not collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include corporate non-accrual loans as well as smaller-balance homogeneous loans whose terms have been modified due to the borrower's financial difficulties and Citigroup granted a concession to the borrower. Such modifications may include interest rate reductions and/or principal forgiveness. Valuation allowances for impaired loans are estimated considering all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value
of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's original contractual effective rate, the secondary market value of the loan and the fair value of collateral less disposal costs. Consumer impaired loans exclude smaller-balance homogeneous loans that have not been modified and are carried on a non-accrual basis, as well as substantially all loans modified for periods of 12 months or less. As of June 30, 2010, loans included in those short-term programs amounted to $7 billion.
The following tables describe certain characteristics of assets owned by certain identified significant unconsolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) as oftable presents information about impaired loans:
In millions of dollars at year end | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-accrual corporate loans | ||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 6,565 | $ | 6,347 | ||||
Loans to financial institutions | 478 | 1,794 | ||||||
Mortgage and real estate | 2,568 | 4,051 | ||||||
Lease financing | 58 | — | ||||||
Other | 1,367 | 1,287 | ||||||
Total non-accrual corporate loans | $ | 11,036 | $ | 13,479 | ||||
Impaired consumer loans(1) | ||||||||
Mortgage and real estate | $ | 16,094 | $ | 10,629 | ||||
Installment and other | 4,440 | 3,853 | ||||||
Cards | 5,028 | 2,453 | ||||||
Total impaired consumer loans | $ | 25,562 | $ | 16,935 | ||||
Total(2) | $ | 36,598 | $ | 30,414 | ||||
Non-accrual corporate loans with valuation allowances | $ | 7,035 | $ | 8,578 | ||||
Impaired consumer loans with valuation allowances | 25,143 | 16,453 | ||||||
Non-accrual corporate valuation allowance | $ | 2,355 | $ | 2,480 | ||||
Impaired consumer valuation allowance | 7,540 | 4,977 | ||||||
Total valuation allowances (3) | $ | 9,895 | $ | 7,457 | ||||
Loan Accounting Policies
The following are Citigroup's accounting policies for loans, allowance for loan losses and related lending activities.
Loans
Loans are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income and unamortized deferred fees and costs except that credit card receivable balances also include accrued interest and fees. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are generally deferred and recognized as adjustments to income over the VIEs arelives of the related loans.
As described in Note 1517 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. SeeStatements, Citi has elected fair value accounting for certain loans. Such loans are carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings. Interest income on such loans is recorded inInterest revenue at the contractually specified rate.
Loans for which the fair value option has not been elected are classified upon origination or acquisition as either held-for-investment or held-for-sale. This classification is based on management's initial intent and ability with regard to those loans.
Loans that are held-for-investment are classified asLoans, net of unearned income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and the related cash flows are included within the cash flows from investing activities category in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on the lineChange in loans. However, when the initial intent for holding a loan has changed from held-for-investment to held-for-sale, the loan is reclassified to held-for-sale, but the related cash flows continue to be reported in cash flows from investing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on the lineProceeds from sales and securitizations of loans.
Substantially all of the consumer loans sold or securitized by Citigroup are U.S. prime residential mortgage loans or U.S. credit card receivables. The practice of the U.S. prime mortgage business has been to sell all of its loans except for non-conforming adjustable rate loans. U.S. prime mortgage conforming loans are classified as held-for-sale at the time of origination. The related cash flows are classified in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in the cash flows from operating activities category on the lineChange in loans held-for-sale.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 in 2010, U.S. credit card receivables were classified at origination as loans-held-for-sale to the extent that management did not have the intent to hold the receivables for the foreseeable future or until maturity. Prior to 2010, the U.S. credit card securitization forecast for the three months following the latest balance sheet date, excluding replenishments, was the basis for the amount of such loans classified as held-for-sale. Cash flows related to U.S. credit card loans classified as held-for-sale at origination or acquisition are reported in the cash flows from operating activities category on the lineChange in loans held-for-sale.
Consumer loans
Consumer loans represent loans and leases managed primarily by theRegional Consumer Banking andLocal Consumer Lending businesses. As a general rule, interest accrual ceases for installment and real estate (both open- and closed-end) loans when payments are 90 days contractually past due. For credit cards and unsecured revolving loans, however, Citi generally accrues interest until payments are 180 days past due. Loans that have been modified to grant a short-term or long-term concession to a borrower who is in financial difficulty may not be accruing interest at the time of the modification. The policy for returning such modified loans to accrual status varies by product and/or region. In most cases, a minimum number of payments (ranging from one to six) are required, while in other cases the loan is never returned to accrual status.
Citi's charge-off policies follow the general guidelines below:
Corporate loans
Corporate loans represent loans and leases managed byICG or theSpecial Asset Pool. Corporate loans are identified as impaired and placed on a cash (non-accrual) basis when it is determined, based on actual experience and a forward-looking assessment of the collectability of the loan in full, that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful or when interest or principal is 90 days past due, except when the loan is well-collateralized and in the process of collection. Any interest accrued on impaired corporate loans and leases is reversed at 90 days and charged against current earnings, and interest is thereafter included in earnings only to the extent actually received in cash. When there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of principal, all cash receipts are thereafter applied to reduce the recorded investment in the loan.
Impaired corporate loans and leases are written down to the extent that principal is judged to be uncollectible. Impaired collateral-dependent loans and leases, where repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying collateral and there are no other available and reliable sources of repayment, are written down to the lower of cost or collateral value. Cash-basis loans are returned to an accrual status when all contractual principal and interest amounts are reasonably assured of repayment and there is a sustained period of repayment performance in accordance with the contractual terms.
Loans Held-for-Sale
Corporate and consumer loans that have been identified for sale are classified as loans held-for-sale included inOther assets. With the exception of certain mortgage loans for which the fair value option has been elected, these loans are accounted for at the lower of cost or market value (LOCOM), with any write-downs or subsequent recoveries charged toOther revenue.
Allowance for Loan Losses
Allowance for loan losses represents management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio, as well as probable losses related to large individually evaluated impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes only, and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable loan losses inherent in the overall portfolio. Additions to the allowance are made through the provision for loan losses. Loan losses are deducted from the allowance, and subsequent recoveries are added. Securities received in exchange for loan claims in debt restructurings are initially recorded at fair value, with any gain or loss reflected as a recovery or charge-off to the allowance, and are subsequently accounted for as securities available-for-sale.
Corporate loans
In the corporate portfolios, the allowance for loan losses includes an asset-specific component and a statistically-based component. The asset-specific component is calculated under ASC 310-10-35,Receivables—Subsequent Measurement (formerly SFAS 114) on an individual basis for larger-balance, non-homogeneous loans, which are considered impaired. An asset-specific allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value (less disposal costs), or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than its carrying value. This allowance considers the borrower's overall financial condition, resources, and payment record, the prospects for support from any financially responsible guarantors (discussed further below) and, if appropriate, the realizable value of any collateral. The asset-specific component of the allowance for smaller balance impaired loans is calculated on a pool basis considering historical loss experience. The allowance for the remainder of the loan portfolio is calculated under ASC 450,Contingencies (formerly SFAS 5) using a statistical methodology, supplemented by management judgment. The statistical analysis considers the portfolio's size, remaining tenor, and credit quality as measured by internal risk ratings assigned to individual credit facilities, which reflect probability of default and loss given default. The statistical analysis considers historical default rates and historical loss severity in the event of default, including historical average levels and historical variability. The result is an estimated range for inherent losses. The best estimate within the range is then determined by management's quantitative and qualitative assessment of current conditions, including general economic conditions, specific industry and geographic trends, and internal factors including portfolio concentrations, trends in internal credit quality indicators, and current and past underwriting standards.
For both the asset-specific and the statistically-based components of the allowance for loan losses, management may incorporate guarantor support. The financial wherewithal of the guarantor is evaluated, as applicable, based on net worth, cash flow statements and personal or company financial statements which are updated and reviewed at least annually. Typically, a guarantee arrangement is used to facilitate cooperation in a restructuring situation. A guarantor's reputation and willingness to work with Citigroup is evaluated based on the historical experience with the guarantor and the knowledge of the marketplace. In the rare event that the guarantor is unwilling or unable to perform or facilitate borrower cooperation, Citi pursues a legal remedy. If Citi does not pursue a legal remedy, it is because Citi does not believe the guarantor has the financial wherewithal to perform regardless of legal action, or because there are legal limitations on simultaneously pursuing guarantors and foreclosure. A guarantor's reputation does not typically impact our decision or ability to seek performance under guarantee.
In cases where a guarantee is a factor in the assessment of loan losses, it is typically included via adjustment to the loan's internal risk rating, which in turn is the basis for the adjustment to the statistically-based component of the allowance for loan losses. To date, it is only in rare circumstances that an impaired commercial or CRE loan is carried at a value in excess of the appraised value due to a guarantee.
When Citi's monitoring of the loan indicates that the guarantor's wherewithal to pay is uncertain or has deteriorated, there is either no change in the risk rating, because the guarantor's credit support was never initially factored in, or the risk rating is adjusted to reflect that uncertainty or deterioration. Accordingly, a guarantor's ultimate failure to perform or a lack of legal enforcement of the guarantee does not materially impact the allowance for loan losses, as there is typically no further significant adjustment of the loan's risk rating at that time.
Consumer loans
ForConsumer loans, each portfolio of smaller-balance, homogeneous loans—including consumer mortgage, installment, revolving credit, and most other consumer loans—is independently evaluated for impairment. The allowance for loan losses attributed to these loans is established via a process that estimates the probable losses inherent in the specific portfolio based upon various analyses. These include migration analysis, in which historical delinquency and credit loss experience is applied to the current aging of the portfolio, together with analyses that reflect current trends and conditions.
Management also considers overall portfolio indicators, including historical credit losses, delinquent, non-performing, and classified loans, trends in volumes and terms of loans, an evaluation of overall credit quality, the credit process, including lending policies and procedures, and economic, geographical, product and other environmental factors. In addition, valuation allowances are determined for impaired smaller-balance homogeneous loans whose terms have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and where it has been determined that a concession was granted to the borrower. Such modifications may include interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness and/or term extensions. Where long-term concessions have been granted, such modifications are accounted for as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). The allowance for loan losses for TDRs is determined in accordance with ASC-310-10-35 by comparing expected cash flows of the loans discounted at the loans' original effective interest rates to the carrying value of the loans. Where short-term concessions have been granted, the allowance for loan losses is materially consistent with the requirements of ASC-310-10-35.
Loans included in the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) trial period are not classified as modified under short-term or long-term programs, and the allowance for loan losses for these loans is calculated under ASC 450-20. The allowance calculation for HAMP trial loans uses default rates that assume that the borrower will not successfully complete the trial period and receive a permanent modification. As of June 30, 2010, of the loans in which the trial period has ended, 37% of the loan balances were successfully modified under HAMP, 12% were modified under the Citi Supplemental program, 6% received HAMP Re-age, (each as described under Consumer Loan Modification Programs) and 45% did not receive any modification from Citi to date.
Reserve Estimates and Policies
Management provides reserves for an estimate of probable losses inherent in the funded loan portfolio on the balance sheet in the form of an allowance for loan losses. These reserves are established in accordance with Citigroup's Credit Reserve Policies, as approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Citi's Chief Risk Officer and Chief Financial Officer review the adequacy of the credit loss reserves each quarter with representatives from the Risk Management and Finance staffs for each applicable business area.
The above-mentioned representatives covering the business areas having classifiably managed portfolios, where internal credit-risk ratings are assigned (primarilyICG, Regional Consumer Banking andLocal Consumer Lending), or modified consumer loans, where concessions were granted due to the borrowers' financial difficulties present recommended reserve balances for their funded and unfunded lending portfolios along with supporting quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data include:
In addition, representatives from both the Risk Management and Finance staffs that cover business areas that have delinquency-managed portfolios containing smaller homogeneous loans present their recommended reserve balances based upon leading credit indicators, including loan delinquencies and changes in portfolio size as well as economic trends including housing prices, unemployment and GDP. This methodology is applied separately for each individual product within each different geographic region in which these portfolios exist.
This evaluation process is subject to numerous estimates and judgments. The frequency of default, risk ratings, loss recovery rates, the size and diversity of individual large credits, and the ability of borrowers with foreign currency obligations to obtain the foreign currency necessary for orderly debt servicing, among other things, are all taken into account during this review. Changes in these estimates could have a direct impact on the credit costs in any quarter and could result in a change in the allowance. Changes to the reserve flow through the Consolidated Statement of Income on the lineProvision for loan losses.
Allowance for Unfunded Lending Commitments
A similar approach to the allowance for loan losses is used for calculating a reserve for the expected losses related to unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit. This reserve is classified on the balance sheet inOther liabilities. Changes to the allowance for unfunded lending commitments flow through the Consolidated Statement of Income on the lineProvision for unfunded lending commitments.
Details of Credit Loss Experience
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period | $ | 48,746 | $ | 36,033 | $ | 36,416 | $ | 35,940 | $ | 31,703 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | $ | 6,672 | $ | 8,244 | $ | 7,077 | $ | 7,321 | $ | 10,010 | |||||||||
Corporate | (149 | ) | 122 | 764 | 1,450 | 2,223 | |||||||||||||
$ | 6,523 | $ | 8,366 | $ | 7,841 | $ | 8,771 | $ | 12,233 | ||||||||||
Gross credit losses | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 6,494 | $ | 6,942 | $ | 4,360 | $ | 4,459 | $ | 4,694 | |||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 1,774 | 1,797 | 2,187 | 2,406 | 2,305 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | 563 | 404 | 478 | 1,101 | 1,216 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 290 | 155 | 877 | 483 | 558 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 9,121 | $ | 9,298 | $ | 7,902 | $ | 8,449 | $ | 8,773 | ||||||||||
Credit recoveries | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 460 | $ | 419 | $ | 160 | $ | 149 | $ | 131 | |||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 318 | 300 | 327 | 288 | 261 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | 307 | 177 | 246 | 30 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 74 | 18 | 34 | 13 | 22 | ||||||||||||||
$ | 1,159 | $ | 914 | $ | 767 | $ | 480 | $ | 418 | ||||||||||
Net credit losses | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 6,290 | $ | 6,750 | $ | 4,432 | $ | 5,381 | $ | 5,775 | |||||||||
In offices outside the U.S. | 1,672 | 1,634 | 2,703 | 2,588 | 2,580 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 7,962 | $ | 8,384 | $ | 7,135 | $ | 7,969 | $ | 8,355 | |||||||||
Other—net(1)(2)(3)(4)(5) | $ | (1,110 | ) | $ | 12,731 | $ | (1,089 | ) | $ | (326 | ) | $ | 359 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses at end of period(6) | $ | 46,197 | $ | 48,746 | $ | 36,033 | $ | 36,416 | $ | 35,940 | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans | 6.72 | % | 6.80 | % | 6.09 | % | 5.85 | % | 5.60 | % | |||||||||
Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(7) | $ | 1,054 | $ | 1,122 | $ | 1,157 | $ | 1,074 | $ | 1,082 | |||||||||
Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments | $ | 47,251 | $ | 49,868 | $ | 37,190 | $ | 37,490 | $ | 37,022 | |||||||||
Net consumer credit losses | $ | 7,490 | $ | 8,020 | $ | 6,060 | $ | 6,428 | $ | 6,607 | |||||||||
As a percentage of average consumer loans | 5.75 | % | 6.04 | % | 5.43 | % | 5.66 | % | 5.88 | % | |||||||||
Net corporate credit losses | $ | 472 | $ | 364 | $ | 1,075 | $ | 1,541 | $ | 1,748 | |||||||||
As a percentage of average corporate loans | 0.25 | % | 0.19 | % | 0.61 | % | 0.82 | % | 0.89 | % | |||||||||
Allowance for loan losses at end of period(8) | |||||||||||||||||||
Citicorp | $ | 17,524 | $ | 18,503 | $ | 10,731 | $ | 10,956 | $ | 10,676 | |||||||||
Citi Holdings | 28,673 | 30,243 | 25,302 | 25,460 | 25,264 | ||||||||||||||
Total Citigroup | $ | 46,197 | $ | 48,746 | $ | 36,033 | $ | 36,416 | $ | 35,940 | |||||||||
Allowance by type | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer(9) | $ | 39,578 | $ | 41,422 | $ | 28,397 | $ | 28,420 | $ | 27,969 | |||||||||
Corporate | 6,619 | 7,324 | 7,636 | 7,996 | 7,971 | ||||||||||||||
Total Citigroup | $ | 46,197 | $ | 48,746 | $ | 36,033 | $ | 36,416 | $ | 35,940 | |||||||||
| | | Credit rating distribution | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citi-Administered Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Conduits | Total assets (in billions) | Weighted average life | AAA | AA | A | BBB/BBB+ and below | ||||||||||||
$ | 44.7 | 4.3 years | 41 | % | 43 | % | 13 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
loan losses are reserves for loans which have been subject to troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) of $7,320 million, $6,926 million, $4,819 million, $4,587 million and $3,810 million as of June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
| | | Credit rating distribution | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total assets (in billions) | Weighted average life | |||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized Debt and Loan Obligations | A or higher | BBB | BB/B | CCC | Unrated | ||||||||||||||||
Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) | $ | 15.9 | 4.0 years | 27 | % | 14 | % | 13 | % | 38 | % | 8 | % | ||||||||
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) | $ | 20.7 | 5.5 years | 1 | % | 0 | % | 53 | % | 4 | % | 42 | % | ||||||||
| Credit rating distribution | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Municipal Securities Tender Option Bond Trusts (TOB) | Total assets (in billions) | Weighted average life | AAA/Aaa | AA/Aa1— AA-/Aa3 | Less than AA-/Aa3 | ||||||||||
Customer TOB trusts (not consolidated) | $ | 8.3 | 12.1 years | 13 | % | 85 | % | 2 | % | ||||||
Proprietary TOB trusts (consolidated and non-consolidated) | $ | 19.5 | 17.4 years | 11 | % | 81 | % | 8 | % | ||||||
QSPE TOB trusts (not consolidated) | $ | 0.8 | 31.9 years | 82 | % | 18 | % | 0 | % | ||||||
FAIR VALUATIONNon-Accrual Assets
The table below summarizes Citigroup's view of non-accrual loans as of the periods indicated. Non-accrual loans are loans in which the borrower has fallen behind in interest payments or, for corporate loans, where Citi has determined that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful, and which are therefore considered impaired. As discussed under "Loan Accounting Policies" above, in situations where Citi reasonably expects that only a portion of the principal and interest owed will ultimately be collected, all payments received are reflected as a reduction of principal and not as interest income. There is no industry-wide definition of non-accrual assets, however, and as such, analysis across the industry is not always comparable.
Corporate non-accrual loans may still be current on interest payments. Consistent with industry conventions, Citi generally accrues interest on credit card loans until such loans are charged-off, which typically occurs at 180 days' contractual delinquency. As such, the non-accrual loan disclosures in this section do not include credit card loans.
Non-accrual loans
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citicorp | $ | 4,510 | $ | 5,024 | $ | 5,353 | $ | 5,507 | $ | 5,395 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 20,302 | 23,544 | 26,387 | 27,177 | 22,851 | ||||||||||||
Total non-accrual loans (NAL) | $ | 24,812 | $ | 28,568 | $ | 31,740 | $ | 32,684 | $ | 28,246 | |||||||
Corporate NAL(1) | |||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 4,411 | $ | 5,660 | $ | 5,621 | $ | 5,263 | $ | 3,499 | |||||||
EMEA | 5,508 | 5,834 | 6,308 | 7,969 | 7,690 | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 570 | 608 | 569 | 416 | 230 | ||||||||||||
Asia | 547 | 830 | 981 | 1,061 | 1,056 | ||||||||||||
$ | 11,036 | $ | 12,932 | $ | 13,479 | $ | 14,709 | $ | 12,475 | ||||||||
Citicorp | $ | 2,573 | $ | 2,975 | $ | 3,238 | $ | 3,300 | $ | 3,159 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 8,463 | 9,957 | 10,241 | 11,409 | 9,316 | ||||||||||||
$ | 11,036 | $ | 12,932 | $ | 13,479 | $ | 14,709 | $ | 12,475 | ||||||||
Consumer NAL(1) | |||||||||||||||||
North America | $ | 11,289 | $ | 12,966 | $ | 15,111 | $ | 14,609 | $ | 12,154 | |||||||
EMEA | 690 | 790 | 1,159 | 1,314 | 1,356 | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 1,218 | 1,246 | 1,340 | 1,342 | 1,520 | ||||||||||||
Asia | 579 | 634 | 651 | 710 | 741 | ||||||||||||
$ | 13,776 | $ | 15,636 | $ | 18,261 | $ | 17,975 | $ | 15,771 | ||||||||
Citicorp | $ | 1,937 | $ | 2,049 | $ | 2,115 | $ | 2,207 | $ | 2,236 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 11,839 | 13,587 | 16,146 | 15,768 | 13,535 | ||||||||||||
$ | 13,776 | $ | 15,636 | $ | 18,261 | $ | 17,975 | $ | 15,771 | ||||||||
Non-Accrual Assets (continued)
The table below summarizes Citigroup's other real estate owned (OREO) assets. This represents the carrying value of all property acquired by foreclosure or other legal proceedings when Citi has taken possession of the collateral.
OREO | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citicorp | $ | 870 | $ | 881 | $ | 874 | $ | 284 | $ | 291 | |||||||
Citi Holdings | 790 | 632 | 615 | 585 | 664 | ||||||||||||
Corporate/Other | 13 | 8 | 11 | 15 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Total OREO | $ | 1,673 | $ | 1,521 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 884 | $ | 969 | |||||||
North America | $ | 1,428 | $ | 1,291 | $ | 1,294 | $ | 682 | $ | 789 | |||||||
EMEA | 146 | 134 | 121 | 105 | 97 | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 43 | 51 | 45 | 40 | 29 | ||||||||||||
Asia | 56 | 45 | 40 | 57 | 54 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,673 | $ | 1,521 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 884 | $ | 969 | ||||||||
Other repossessed assets(1) | $ | 55 | $ | 64 | $ | 73 | $ | 76 | $ | 72 | |||||||
Non-accrual assets (NAA)—Total Citigroup | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corporate NAL | $ | 11,036 | $ | 12,932 | $ | 13,479 | $ | 14,709 | $ | 12,475 | |||||||
Consumer NAL | 13,776 | 15,636 | 18,261 | 17,975 | 15,771 | ||||||||||||
NAL | $ | 24,812 | $ | 28,568 | $ | 31,740 | $ | 32,684 | $ | 28,246 | |||||||
OREO | $ | 1,673 | $ | 1,521 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 884 | $ | 969 | |||||||
Other repossessed assets | 55 | 64 | 73 | 76 | 72 | ||||||||||||
NAA | $ | 26,540 | $ | 30,153 | $ | 33,313 | $ | 33,644 | $ | 29,287 | |||||||
NAL as a percentage of total loans | 3.58 | % | 3.96 | % | 5.37 | % | 5.25 | % | 4.40 | % | |||||||
NAA as a percentage of total assets | 1.37 | % | 1.51 | % | 1.79 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.58 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1) | 186 | % | 171 | % | 114 | % | 111 | % | 127 | % | |||||||
NAA—Total Citicorp | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 4th Qtr. 2009 | 3rd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NAL | $ | 4,510 | $ | 5,024 | $ | 5,353 | $ | 5,507 | $ | 5,395 | |||||||
OREO | 870 | 881 | 874 | 284 | 291 | ||||||||||||
Other repossessed assets | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
Non-accrual assets (NAA) | $ | 5,380 | $ | 5,905 | $ | 6,227 | $ | 5,791 | $ | 5,686 | |||||||
NAA as a percentage of total assets | 0.44 | % | 0.48 | % | 0.55 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.54 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1) | 389 | % | 368 | % | 200 | % | 199 | % | 198 | % | |||||||
NAA—Total Citi Holdings | |||||||||||||||||
NAL | $ | 20,302 | $ | 23,544 | $ | 26,387 | $ | 27,177 | $ | 22,851 | |||||||
OREO | 790 | 632 | 615 | 585 | 664 | ||||||||||||
Other repossessed assets | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||
NAA | $ | 21,092 | $ | 24,176 | $ | 27,002 | $ | 27,762 | $ | 23,515 | |||||||
NAA as a percentage of total assets | 4.54 | % | 4.81 | % | 5.54 | % | 4.99 | % | 4.04 | % | |||||||
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1) | 141 | % | 128 | % | 96 | % | 94 | % | 111 | % | |||||||
N/A Not available at the Citicorp or Citi Holdings level.
Renegotiated Loans
The following table presents loans which were modified in a troubled debt restructuring.
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corporate renegotiated loans(1) | ||||||||
In U.S. offices | ||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 254 | $ | 203 | ||||
Mortgage and real estate | 169 | — | ||||||
Other | 143 | — | ||||||
$ | 566 | $ | 203 | |||||
In offices outside the U.S. | ||||||||
Commercial and industrial | $ | 192 | $ | 145 | ||||
Mortgage and real estate | 7 | 2 | ||||||
Other | — | — | ||||||
$ | 199 | $ | 147 | |||||
Total corporate renegotiated loans | $ | 765 | $ | 350 | ||||
Consumer renegotiated loans(2)(3)(4)(5) | ||||||||
In U.S. offices | ||||||||
Mortgage and real estate | $ | 16,582 | $ | 11,165 | ||||
Cards | 4,044 | 992 | ||||||
Installment and other | 2,180 | 2,689 | ||||||
$ | 22,806 | $ | 14,846 | |||||
In offices outside the U.S. | ||||||||
Mortgage and real estate | $ | 734 | $ | 415 | ||||
Cards | 985 | 1,461 | ||||||
Installment and other | 2,189 | 1,401 | ||||||
3,908 | 3,277 | |||||||
Total consumer renegotiated loans | $ | 26,714 | $ | 18,123 | ||||
Representations and Warranties
When selling a loan, Citi makes various representations and warranties relating to, among other things, the following:
The specific representations and warranties made by Citi depend on the nature of the transaction and the requirements of the buyer. Market conditions and credit-rating agency requirements may also affect representations and warranties and the other provisions Citi may agree to in loan sales.
Citi's representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits in amount or time of coverage. However, contractual liability arises only when the representations and warranties are breached and generally only when a loss results from the breach. In the event of a breach of these representations and warranties, Citi may be required to either repurchase the mortgage loans (generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest), with the identified defects, or indemnify ("make whole") the investors for their losses.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, almost half of Citi's repurchases and make-whole payments were attributable to misrepresentation of facts by either the borrower or a third party (e.g., income, employment, debts, FICO, etc.), up from approximately a quarter for the respective periods in 2009. In addition, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, approximately 20% of Citi's repurchases and make-whole payments related to appraisal issues (e.g., an error or misrepresentation of value), up from approximately 9% for the respective 2009 periods. The third largest category of repurchases and make-whole payments in 2010, to date, related to program requirements (e.g., a loan that does not meet investor guidelines such as contractual interest rate), which was the second largest category in the first half of 2009. There is not a meaningful difference in incurred or estimated loss for each type of defect.
In the case of a repurchase, Citi will bear any subsequent credit loss on the mortgage loan and the loan is typically considered a credit-impaired loan and accounted for under SOP 03-3, "Accounting for Certain Loans and Debt Securities, Acquired in a Transfer" (now incorporated into ASC 310-30,Receivables—Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality). To date, these repurchases have not had a material impact on Citi's non-performing loan statistics because credit-impaired purchased SOP 03-3 loans are not included in non-accrual loans.
As evidenced by the tables below, to date, Citigroup's repurchases have primarily been from the government sponsored entities (GSEs).
The unpaid principal balance of repurchased loans for representation and warranty claims for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:
| Three months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||
In millions of dollars | Unpaid Principal Balance | Unpaid Principal Balance | |||||
GSEs | $ | 63 | $ | 83 | |||
Private investors | 8 | 4 | |||||
Total | $ | 71 | $ | 87 | |||
The unpaid principal balance of repurchased loans for representation and warranty claims for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||
In millions of dollars | Unpaid Principal Balance | Unpaid Principal Balance | |||||
GSEs | $ | 150 | $ | 156 | |||
Private investors | 12 | 10 | |||||
Total | $ | 162 | $ | 166 | |||
In addition, Citi recorded make-whole payments of $43 million and $17 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, and $66 million and $24 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.
Citi has recorded a reserve for its exposure to losses from the obligation to repurchase previously sold loans (repurchase reserve) that is included inOther liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The repurchase reserve is net of reimbursements estimated to be received by Citi for indemnification agreements relating to previous acquisitions of mortgage servicing rights. In the case of a repurchase of a credit-impaired SOP 03-3 loan, the difference between the loan's fair value and unpaid principal balance at the time of the repurchase is recorded as a utilization of the repurchase reserve. Make-whole payments to the investor are also treated as utilizations and charged directly against the reserve. The repurchase reserve is estimated when Citi sells loans (recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale, which is included inOther revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income) and is updated quarterly. Any change in estimate is recorded inOther revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
The repurchase reserve is calculated separately by sales vintage (i.e., the year the loans were sold) based on various assumptions. While substantially all of Citi's current loan sales are with GSEs, with which Citi has considerable historical experience, these assumptions contain a level of uncertainty and risk that, if different from actual results, could have a material impact on the reserve amounts. The most significant assumptions used to calculate the reserve levels are as follows:
In Citi's experience to date, as stated above, the request for loan documentation packages is an early indicator of a potential claim. During 2009, loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims increased. In addition, Citi's loss severity estimates increased during 2009 due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and its experience with actual losses at such time. As set forth in the tables below, these factors contributed to changes in estimates for the repurchase reserve amounting to $103 million and $247 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
During the second quarter of 2010, loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims further increased. In addition, there was an overall deterioration in the other key assumptions due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and Citi's continued experience with actual losses. These factors contributed to the $347 million change in estimate for the repurchase reserve in the quarter.
As indicated above, the repurchase reserve is calculated by sales vintage. The majority of the repurchases in 2010 were from the 2006 through 2008 sales vintages and, in 2009, were from the 2006 and 2007 vintages, which also represent the vintages with the largest loss-given-repurchase. An insignificant percentage of 2010 and 2009 repurchases were from vintages prior to 2006, and Citi currently anticipates that this percentage will decrease, as those vintages are later in the credit cycle. Although early in the credit cycle, to date, Citi has experienced improved repurchase and loss-given-repurchase statistics from the 2009 and 2010 vintages.
The activity in the repurchase reserve for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:
| Three months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 450 | $ | 218 | |||
Additions for new sales | 4 | 13 | |||||
Change in estimate | 347 | 103 | |||||
Utilizations | (74 | ) | (55 | ) | |||
Balance, end of period | $ | 727 | $ | 279 | |||
The activity in the repurchase reserve for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 482 | $ | 75 | |||
Additions for new sales | 9 | 19 | |||||
Change in estimate | 347 | 247 | |||||
Utilizations | (111 | ) | (62 | ) | |||
Balance, end of period | $ | 727 | $ | 279 | |||
Citi does not believe a meaningful range of reasonably possible loss related to its repurchase reserve can be determined.
Projected future repurchases are calculated, in part, based on the level of unresolved claims at quarter-end as well as trends in claims being made by investors. For GSEs, the response to the repurchase claim is required within 90 days of the claim receipt. If Citi did not respond within 90 days, the claim would then be discussed between Citi and the GSE. For private investors, the time period for responding is governed by the individual sale agreement. If the specified timeframe is exceeded, the investor may choose to initiate legal action.
As would be expected, as the trend in claims and inventory increases, Citi's reserve for repurchases typically increases. Included in Citi's current reserve estimate is an assumption that repurchase claims will remain at elevated levels for the foreseeable future, although the actual number of claims may differ and is subject to uncertainty. Furthermore, approximately half of the repurchase claims in Citi's recent experience have been successfully appealed and resulted in no loss to Citi.
The number of unresolved claims by type of claimant as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, was as follows:
Number of claims | June 30 2010 | December 31 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSEs | 4,166 | 2,575 | |||||
Private investors | 214 | 309 | |||||
Mortgage insurers(1) | 98 | 204 | |||||
Total | 4,478 | 3,088 | |||||
Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts and Ratios
| Total loans(6) | 90+ days past due(1) | 30-89 days past due(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except EOP loan amounts in billions | Jun. 2010 | Jun. 2010 | Mar. 2010 | Jun. 2009 | Jun. 2010 | Mar. 2010 | Jun. 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Citicorp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 218.5 | $ | 3,733 | $ | 3,937 | $ | 4,289 | $ | 3,858 | $ | 4,294 | $ | 4,328 | ||||||||||
Ratio | 1.71 | % | 1.78 | % | 1.97 | % | 1.77 | % | 1.94 | % | 1.99 | % | ||||||||||||
Retail Bank | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 109.1 | 804 | 782 | 767 | 1,131 | 1,200 | 1,084 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 0.74 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.74 | % | 1.04 | % | 1.08 | % | 1.05 | % | ||||||||||||
North America | 30.2 | 245 | 142 | 97 | 241 | 236 | 87 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 0.81 | % | 0.45 | % | 0.29 | % | 0.80 | % | 0.75 | % | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||||
EMEA | 4.3 | 50 | 52 | 70 | 145 | 182 | 235 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 1.16 | % | 1.06 | % | 1.23 | % | 3.37 | % | 3.71 | % | 4.12 | % | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 19.6 | 308 | 352 | 316 | 305 | 346 | 337 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 1.57 | % | 1.81 | % | 1.92 | % | 1.56 | % | 1.78 | % | 2.04 | % | ||||||||||||
Asia | 55.0 | 201 | 236 | 284 | 440 | 436 | 425 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 0.37 | % | 0.43 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.80 | % | 0.80 | % | 0.90 | % | ||||||||||||
Citi-Branded Cards(2)(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 109.4 | 2,929 | 3,155 | 3,522 | 2,727 | 3,094 | 3,244 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 2.68 | % | 2.86 | % | 3.07 | % | 2.49 | % | 2.81 | % | 2.83 | % | ||||||||||||
North America | 77.2 | 2,130 | 2,304 | 2,366 | 1,828 | 2,145 | 2,024 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 2.76 | % | 2.97 | % | 2.84 | % | 2.37 | % | 2.76 | % | 2.43 | % | ||||||||||||
EMEA | 2.6 | 72 | 77 | 99 | 90 | 113 | 146 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 2.77 | % | 2.66 | % | 3.54 | % | 3.46 | % | 3.90 | % | 5.21 | % | ||||||||||||
Latin America | 12.0 | 481 | 510 | 707 | 485 | 475 | 693 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 4.01 | % | 4.21 | % | 5.84 | % | 4.04 | % | 3.93 | % | 5.73 | % | ||||||||||||
Asia | 17.6 | 246 | 264 | 350 | 324 | 361 | 381 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 1.40 | % | 1.51 | % | 2.12 | % | 1.84 | % | 2.06 | % | 2.31 | % | ||||||||||||
Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 286.3 | 14,371 | 16,808 | 15,869 | 11,201 | 12,236 | 14,371 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 5.24 | % | 5.66 | % | 4.80 | % | 4.08 | % | 4.12 | % | 4.35 | % | ||||||||||||
International | 24.6 | 724 | 953 | 1,551 | 939 | 1,059 | 1,845 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 2.94 | % | 3.44 | % | 3.93 | % | 3.82 | % | 3.82 | % | 4.67 | % | ||||||||||||
North America retail partner cards(2)(3) | 50.2 | 2,004 | 2,385 | 2,590 | 2,150 | 2,374 | 2,749 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 3.99 | % | 4.38 | % | 4.09 | % | 4.28 | % | 4.36 | % | 4.34 | % | ||||||||||||
North America (excluding cards)(4)(5) | 211.5 | 11,643 | 13,470 | 11,728 | 8,112 | 8,803 | 9,777 | |||||||||||||||||
Ratio | 5.84 | % | 6.27 | % | 5.16 | % | 4.07 | % | 4.10 | % | 4.30 | % | ||||||||||||
Total Citigroup (excludingSpecial Asset Pool) | $ | 504.8 | $ | 18,104 | $ | 20,745 | $ | 20,158 | $ | 15,059 | $ | 16,530 | $ | 18,699 | ||||||||||
Ratio | 3.67 | % | 4.01 | % | 3.68 | % | 3.06 | % | 3.19 | % | 3.41 | % | ||||||||||||
Consumer Loan Net Credit Losses and Ratios
| Average loans(1) | Net credit losses(2) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except average loan amounts in billions | 2Q10 | 2Q10 | 1Q10 | 2Q09 | |||||||||||
Citicorp | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 217.8 | $ | 2,922 | $ | 3,040 | $ | 1,406 | |||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,837 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | $ | 2,922 | $ | 3,040 | $ | 3,243 | |||||||||
Ratio | 5.38 | % | 5.57 | % | 6.01 | % | |||||||||
Retail Bank | |||||||||||||||
Total | 109.3 | 304 | 289 | 428 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 1.12 | % | 1.07 | % | 1.66 | % | |||||||||
North America | 30.7 | 79 | 73 | 88 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 1.03 | % | 0.92 | % | 1.01 | % | |||||||||
EMEA | 4.5 | 46 | 47 | 74 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 4.10 | % | 3.81 | % | 5.30 | % | |||||||||
Latin America | 19.4 | 96 | 91 | 138 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 1.98 | % | 1.99 | % | 3.40 | % | |||||||||
Asia | 54.7 | 83 | 78 | 128 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 0.61 | % | 0.59 | % | 1.10 | % | |||||||||
Citi-Branded Cards | |||||||||||||||
Total | 108.5 | 2,618 | 2,751 | 978 | |||||||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,837 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 2,618 | 2,751 | 2,815 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 9.68 | % | 9.96 | % | 10.02 | % | |||||||||
North America | 76.2 | 2,047 | 2,084 | 219 | |||||||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,837 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 2,047 | 2,084 | 2,056 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 10.77 | % | 10.67 | % | 10.08 | % | |||||||||
EMEA | 2.7 | 39 | 50 | 47 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 5.79 | % | 6.99 | % | 6.73 | % | |||||||||
Latin America | 12.0 | 361 | 418 | 472 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 12.07 | % | 14.01 | % | 15.91 | % | |||||||||
Asia | 17.6 | 171 | 199 | 240 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 3.90 | % | 4.53 | % | 5.94 | % | |||||||||
Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending | |||||||||||||||
Total | 301.7 | 4,535 | 4,938 | 5,144 | |||||||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,278 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 4,535 | 4,938 | 6,422 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 6.03 | % | 6.30 | % | 7.48 | % | |||||||||
International | 26.1 | 495 | 612 | 962 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 7.61 | % | 8.27 | % | 9.72 | % | |||||||||
North America retail partner cards | 53.1 | 1,775 | 1,932 | 872 | |||||||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 1,278 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 1,775 | 1,932 | 2,150 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 13.41 | % | 13.72 | % | 13.58 | % | |||||||||
North America (excluding cards) | 222.5 | 2,265 | 2,394 | 3,310 | |||||||||||
Ratio | 4.08 | % | 4.20 | % | 5.50 | % | |||||||||
Total Citigroup (excludingSpecial Asset Pool) | $ | 519.5 | $ | 7,457 | $ | 7,978 | $ | 6,550 | |||||||
Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3) | — | — | 3,115 | ||||||||||||
Managed NCL | 7,457 | 7,978 | 9,665 | ||||||||||||
Ratio | 5.76 | % | 6.00 | % | 6.92 | % | |||||||||
Consumer Loan Modification Programs
Citigroup has instituted a variety of modification programs to assist borrowers with financial difficulties. These programs, as described below, include modifying the original loan terms, reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. At June 30, 2010, Citi's significant modification programs consisted of the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), as well as short-term and long-term modification programs, each as summarized below.
HAMP. The HAMP is designed to reduce monthly first mortgage payments to a 31% housing debt ratio (monthly mortgage payment, including property taxes, insurance and homeowner dues, divided by monthly gross income) by lowering the interest rate, extending the term of the loan and deferring or forgiving principal of certain eligible borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgages or who are at risk of imminent default due to economic hardship. The interest rate reduction for first mortgages under HAMP is in effect for five years and the rate then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate cap (the lower of the original rate or the Freddie Mac Weekly Primary Mortgage Market Survey rate for a 30-year fixed rate conforming loan as of the date of the modification) is reached.
In order to be entitled to loan modifications, borrowers must complete a three- to- five-month trial period, make the agreed payments and provide the required documentation. Beginning March 1, 2010, documentation is required to be provided prior to beginning the trial period, whereas prior to that date, it was required to be provided before the end of the trial period. This change generally means that Citi is able to verify income up front for potential HAMP participants before they begin making lower monthly payments. Citi currently believes this change will limit the number of borrowers who ultimately fall out of the trials and potentially mitigates the impact of HAMP trial participants on early bucket delinquency data.
During the trial period, Citi requires that the original terms of the loans remain in effect pending completion of the modification. From inception through June 30, 2010, approximately $8.5 billion of first mortgages were enrolled in the HAMP trial period, while $2.5 billion have successfully completed the trial period. Upon completion of the trial period, the terms of the loan are contractually modified, and it is accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring (see "Long-term programs" below).
Citi also recently agreed to participate in the U.S. Treasury's HAMP second mortgage program, which requires Citi to either: (1) modify the borrower's second mortgage according to a defined protocol; or (2) accept a lump sum payment from the U.S. Treasury in exchange for full extinguishment of the second mortgage. For a borrower to qualify, the borrower must have successfully modified his/her first mortgage under the HAMP and met other criteria.
Loans included in the HAMP trial period are not classified as modified under short-term or long-term programs, and the allowance for loan losses for these loans is calculated under ASC 450-20. See "Loan Accounting Policies" above for a further discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.
As of June 30, 2010, of the loans in which the trial period has ended, 37% of the loan balances were successfully modified under HAMP, 12% were modified under the Citi Supplemental program, 6% received HAMP Re-age, (as described under Consumer Loan Modification Programs) and 45% did not receive any modification from Citi to date.
Long-term programs. Long-term modification programs or troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) occur when the terms of a loan have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and a long-term concession has been granted to the borrower. Substantially all long-term programs in place provide interest rate reductions. See "Loan Accounting Policies" above for a discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.
The following table presents Citigroup's consumer loan TDRs as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. As discussed above under "HAMP", HAMP loans whose terms are contractually modified after successful completion of the trial period are included in the balances below:
| Accrual | Non-accrual | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Jun. 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | Jun. 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | |||||||||
Mortgage and real estate | $ | 14,135 | $ | 8,654 | $ | 1,776 | $ | 1,413 | |||||
Cards(1) | 4,995 | 2,303 | 34 | 150 | |||||||||
Installment and other | 3,431 | 3,128 | 333 | 250 | |||||||||
The predominant amount of these TDRs are concentrated in the U.S. Citi's significant long-term U.S. modification programs include:
Citi Supplemental. The Citi Supplemental (CSM) program was designed by Citi to assist borrowers ineligible for HAMP or who become ineligible through the HAMP trial period process. If the borrower already has less than a 31% housing debt ratio, the modification offered is an interest rate reduction (up to 2.5% with a floor rate of 4%) which is in effect for two years, and the rate then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate is at the pre-modified contractual rate. If the borrower's housing debt ratio is greater than 31%, specific treatment steps for HAMP, including an interest rate reduction, will be followed to achieve a 31% housing debt ratio. The modified interest rate is in effect for two years and then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate is at the pre-modified contractual rate. If income documentation was not supplied previously for HAMP, it is required for CSM. Three or more trial payments are required prior to modification. These payments can be made during the HAMP and/or CSM trial period.
HAMP Re-Age. As previously disclosed, loans in the HAMP trial period are aged according to their original contractual terms, rather than the modified HAMP terms. This results in the receivable being reported as delinquent even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower. Upon conclusion of the trial period, loans that do not qualify for a long-term modification are returned to the delinquency status in which they began their trial period. However, that delinquency status would be further deteriorated for each trial payment not made (HAMP Re-age). HAMP Re-age establishes a non-interest-bearing deferral
based on the difference between the original contractual amounts due and the HAMP trial payments made. Citigroup considers this re-age and deferral process to constitute a concession to a borrower in financial difficulty and therefore records the loans as TDRs upon re-age.
2nd FDIC. The 2nd FDIC modification program guidelines were created by the FDIC for delinquent or current borrowers where default is reasonably foreseeable. The program is designed for second mortgages and uses various concessions, including interest rate reductions, non-interest-bearing principal deferral, principal forgiveness, extending maturity dates, and forgiving accrued interest and late fees. These potential concessions are applied in a series of steps (similar to HAMP) that provides an affordable payment to the borrower (generally a combined housing payment ratio of 42%). The first step generally reduces the borrower's interest rate to 2% for fixed-rate home equity loans and 0.5% for home equity lines of credit. The interest rate reduction is in effect for the remaining term of the loan.
FHA/VA. Loans guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) are modified through the normal modification process required by those respective agencies. Borrowers must be delinquent and concessions include interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness, extending maturity dates, and forgiving accrued interest and late fees. The interest rate reduction is in effect for the remaining loan term. Losses on FHA loans are borne by the sponsoring agency provided that the insurance has not been breached as a result of an origination defect. The VA establishes a loan-level loss cap, beyond which Citi is liable for loss. Historically, Citi's losses on FHA and VA loans have been negligible.
CFNA Adjustment of Terms (AOT). This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a permanent hardship. Payment reduction is provided through the re-amortization of the remaining loan balance, typically at a lower interest rate Modified loan tenors may not exceed a period of 480 months. Generally, the rescheduled payment cannot be less than 50% of the original payment amount unless the AOT is a result of participation in the CitiFinancial Home Affordability Modification Program (CHAMP) or military service member's Credit Relief Act Program (SCRA), or as a result of settlement, court order, judgment, or bankruptcy. Customers must make a qualifying payment at the reduced payment amount in order to qualify for the modification. In addition, customers must provide income verification (pay stubs and/or tax returns) and monthly obligations are validated through an updated credit report.
Other. Prior to the implementation of the HAMP, CSM and 2nd FDIC programs, Citigroup's U.S. mortgage business offered certain borrowers various tailored modifications, which included reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. Citigroup currently believes that substantially all of its future long-term U.S. mortgage modifications, at least in the near term, will be included in the programs mentioned above.
Paydown. The Paydown program is designed to liquidate a customer's balance within 60 months. It is available to customers who indicate long-term hardship (e.g., long-term disability, death of a co-borrower, medical issues or a non-temporary income reduction, such as an occupation change). Payment requirements are decreased by reducing interest rates charged to either 9.9% or 0%, depending upon the customer situation, and designed to amortize at least 1% of the balance each month. Under this program, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.
CCG. The CCG program handles proposals received via external consumer credit counselors on the customer's behalf. In order to qualify, customers work with a credit counseling agency to develop a plan to handle their overall budget, including money owed to Citi. A copy of the counseling agency's proposal letter is required. The annual percentage rate (APR) is reduced to 9.9%. The account fully amortizes in 60 months. Under this program, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.
Interest Reversal Paydown. The Interest Reversal Paydown program is also designed to liquidate a customer's balance within 60 months. It is available to customers who indicate a long-term hardship.Accumulated interest and fees owed to Citi are reversed upon enrollment, and future interest and fees are discontinued. Payment requirements are reduced and are designed to amortize at least 1% of the balance each month. Under this program, like the programs discussed above, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.
Auto Hardship Amendment. This program is targeted to customers with a permanent hardship. Examples of permanent hardships include disability subsequent to loan origination, divorce where the party remaining with the vehicle does not have the necessary income to service the debt, or death of a co-borrower. In order to qualify for this program, a customer must complete an "Income and Expense Analysis" and provide proof of income. This analysis is used to determine ability to pay and to establish realistic loan terms (which generally consist of a reduction in interest rates, but could also include principal forgiveness). The borrower must make a payment within 30 days prior to the amendment.
CFNA Adjustment of Terms (AOT). This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a permanent hardship. Payment reduction is provided through the re-amortization of the remaining loan balance, typically at a lower interest rate. Loan payments may be rescheduled over a period not to exceed 120 months. Generally, the rescheduled payment cannot be less than 50% of the original payment amount, unless the AOT is a result of a military service member's SCRA, or as a result of settlement, court order, judgment or bankruptcy. The interest rate cannot be reduced below 9% (except in the instances listed above). Customers must make a qualifying payment at the reduced payment amount in order to qualify for the modification. In addition, customers must provide proof of income and monthly obligations are validated through an updated credit report.
For general information on Citi's U.S. installment loan portfolio, see "U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans" below.
The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2010, information relating to Citi's significant long-term U.S. modification programs:
In millions of dollars | Program balance | Program start date(1) | Average interest rate reduction | Average % payment relief | Average tenor of modified loans | Deferred principal | Principal forgiveness | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending | ||||||||||||||||||||||
HAMP | $ | 2,331 | 3Q09 | 4 | % | 41 | % | 32 years | $ | 289 | $ | 2 | ||||||||||
Citi Supplemental | 835 | 4Q09 | 3 | 24 | 28 years | 46 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
HAMP Re-age | 439 | 1Q10 | N/A | N/A | 25 years | 7 | — | |||||||||||||||
2nd FDIC | 355 | 2Q09 | 7 | 48 | 25 years | 21 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
FHA/VA | 3,604 | 2 | 16 | 28 years | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Adjustment of Terms (AOTs) | 3,700 | 3 | 23 | 29 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Other | 3,782 | 4 | 42 | 28 years | 33 | 47 | ||||||||||||||||
North America Cards | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Paydown | 2,218 | 14 | — | 60 months | ||||||||||||||||||
CCG | 1,756 | 10 | — | 60 months | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Reversal Paydown | 213 | 18 | — | 60 months | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Installment | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Auto Hardship Amendment | 723 | 9 | 28 | 51 months | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
AOTs | 1,062 | 8 | 34 | 106 months | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term programs. Citigroup has also instituted short-term programs (primarily in the U.S.) to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships. These programs include short-term (12 months or less) interest rate reductions and deferrals of past due payments. The loan volume under these short-term programs has increased significantly over the past 18 months , and loan loss reserves for these loans have been enhanced, giving consideration to the higher risk associated with those borrowers and reflecting the estimated future credit losses for those loans. See "Loan Accounting Policies" above for a further discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.
The following table presents the amounts of gross loans modified under short-term interest rate reduction programs in the U.S. as of June 30, 2010:
| June 30, 2010 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Accrual | Non-accrual | |||||
Cards | $ | 3,732 | |||||
Mortgage and real estate | 1,812 | $ | 50 | ||||
Installment and other | 1,364 | 80 | |||||
Significant short-term U.S. programs include:
Universal Payment Program (UPP). The North America cards business provides short-term interest rate reductions to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships through the UPP. Under this program, a participant's APR is reduced by at least 500 basis points for a period of up to 12 months. The minimum payment is tailored to the customer's needs and is designed to amortize at least 1% of the principal balance each month. The participant's APR returns to its original rate at the end of the term or earlier if they fail to make the required payments.
U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending
Temporary AOT. This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a temporary hardship. Examples of temporary hardships would include a short-term medical disability or a temporary reduction of pay. Under this program, the interest rate is reduced for either a five- or an eleven-month period. At the end of the temporary modification period, the interest rate reverts to the pre-modification amount. If the customer is still undergoing hardship at the conclusion of the temporary payment reduction, a second extension of the temporary terms can be considered in either of the time period increments above. In cases where the account is severely past due (over 60 days past due) at the expiration of the temporary modification period, the terms of the modification are made permanent and the payment is kept at the reduced amount for the remaining life of the loan.
U.S Installment and Other Revolving Loans
Temporary AOT. This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a temporary hardship. Under this program, the interest rate is reduced for either a five- or an eleven-month period. At the end of the temporary modification period, the interest rate reverts to the pre-modification amount. If the customer is still undergoing hardship at the conclusion
of the temporary payment reduction, a second extension of the temporary terms can be considered in either of the time period increments above. In cases where the account is severely past due (over 90 days past due) at the expiration of the temporary modification period, the terms of the modification are made permanent and the payment is kept at the reduced amount for the remaining life of the loan.
The following table set forth, as of June 30, 2010, information related to Citi's significant short-term U.S. modification programs:
In millions of dollars | Program balance | Program start date(1) | Average interest rate reduction | Average time period for reduction | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UPP | $ | 3,732 | 19 | % | 12 months | ||||||
U.S. Consumer Mortgage Temporary AOT | 1,852 | 1Q09 | 3 | % | 8 months | ||||||
U.S. Installment Temporary AOT | 1,444 | 1Q09 | 5 | % | 7 months | ||||||
Payment deferrals that do not continue to accrue interest (extensions) primarily occur in the U.S. residential mortgage business. Under an extension, payments that are contractually due are deferred to a later date, thereby extending the maturity date by the number of months of payments being deferred. Extensions assist delinquent borrowers who have experienced short-term financial difficulties that have been resolved by the time the extension is granted. An extension can only be offered to borrowers who are past due on their monthly payments but have since demonstrated the ability and willingness to pay as agreed. Other payment deferrals continue to accrue interest and are not deemed to offer concessions to the customer. Other types of concessions are not material.
Please see "U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending," "North America Cards," and "U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans" below for a discussion of the impact, to date, of Citi's significant U.S. loan modification programs described above on the respective loan portfolios.
U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending
Overview
Citi's North America consumer mortgage portfolio consists of both first lien and second lien mortgages. As of June 30, 2010, the first lien mortgage portfolio totaled approximately $109 billion while the second lien mortgage portfolio was approximately $53 billion. Although the majority of the mortgage portfolio is reported inLCL within Citi Holdings, there are $18 billion of first lien mortgages and $5 billion of second lien mortgages reported in Citicorp.
Citi's first lien mortgage portfolio includes $9.6 billion of loans with Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or Veterans Administration (VA) guarantees. These portfolios consist of loans originated to low-to-moderate-income borrowers with lower FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) scores and generally have higher loan-to-value ratios (LTVs). Losses on FHA loans are borne by the sponsoring agency, provided that the insurance has not been breached as a result of an origination defect. The VA establishes a loan-level loss cap, beyond which Citi is liable for loss. FHA and VA loans have high delinquency rates but, given the guarantees, Citi has experienced negligible credit losses on these loans. The first lien mortgage portfolio also includes $1.8 billion of loans with LTVs above 80%, which have insurance through private mortgage insurance (PMI) companies, and $2.0 billion of loans subject to long-term standby commitments(1) (LTSC), with U.S. government sponsored entities (GSEs), for which Citi has limited exposure to credit losses. Citi's second lien mortgage portfolio also includes $1.5 billion of loans subject to LTSCs with GSEs, for which Citi has limited exposure to credit losses. Citi's allowance for loan loss calculations take into consideration the impact of these guarantees.
Impact of Mortgage Modification Programs on Consumer Mortgage Portfolio
As discussed in "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" above, Citigroup also offers short-term and long-term real estate loan modification programs. The main objective of these programs is generally to reduce the payment burden for the borrower and improve the net present value of cash flows. Citi monitors the performance of its real estate loan modification programs by tracking credit loss rates by vintage. At 18 months after modifying an account, in Citi's experience to date, credit loss rates are typically reduced by approximately one-third compared to accounts that were not modified.
Citigroup considers a combination of historical re-default rates, the current economic environment, and the nature of the modification program in forecasting expected cash flows in the determination of the allowance for loan losses on TDRs. With respect to HAMP, contractual modifications of loans that successfully completed the HAMP trial period began in the third quarter of 2009; accordingly, this is the earliest HAMP vintage available for comparison. While Citi continues to evaluate the impact of HAMP, Citi's experience to date is that re-default rates are likely to be lower for HAMP-modified loans as compared to Citi Supplemental modifications due to what it believes to be the deeper payment and interest rate reductions associated with HAMP modifications.
Consumer Mortgage Quarterly Trends—Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses
The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for the Citi's first and second lien North America consumer mortgage portfolios.
In the first lien mortgage portfolio, as previously disclosed, both delinquencies and net credit losses have continued to be impacted by the HAMP trial loans and the growing backlog of foreclosures in process. As previously disclosed, loans in the HAMP trial modification period that do not make their original contractual payments are reported as delinquent, even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower. Upon conclusion of the trial period, loans that are not modified permanently are returned to the delinquency status in which they began their trial period, adjusted for the number of payments received during the trial period. If the loans are modified permanently, they will be returned to current status.
In addition, the growing amount of foreclosures in process, which continues to be related to an industry-wide phenomenon resulting from foreclosure moratoria and other efforts to prevent or forestall foreclosure, have specific implications for the portfolio:
As set forth in the charts below, both first and second lien mortgages experienced fewer 90 days or more delinquencies in the second quarter of 2010, which led to lower net credit losses in the quarter as well. For first lien mortgages, the sequential improvement in 90 days or more delinquencies was driven entirely by asset sales and HAMP trials converting into permanent modifications. In the quarter, Citi sold $1.3 billion in delinquent mortgages. As of June 30, 2010, $2.5 billion of HAMP trial modifications in Citi's on-balance sheet portfolio were converted to permanent modifications, up from $1.6 billion at the end of the first quarter of 2010. For second lien mortgages, the net credit loss decrease during the quarter was driven by roll rate improvement.
Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans 90 days or more past due exclude loans recorded at fair value and U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored agencies because the potential loss predominately resides with the U.S. agencies.
Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans 90 days or more past due exclude loans recorded at fair value and U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored agencies because the potential loss predominately resides with the U.S. agencies.
Consumer Mortgage FICO and LTV
Data appearing in the tables below have been sourced from Citigroup's risk systems and, as such, may not reconcile with disclosures elsewhere generally due to differences in methodology or variations in the manner in which information is captured. Citi has noted such variations in instances where it believes they could be material to reconcile the information presented elsewhere.
Citi's credit risk policy is not to offer option adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs)/negative amortizing mortgage products to its customers. As a result, option ARMs/negative amortizing mortgages represent an insignificant portion of total balances since they were acquired only incidentally as part of prior portfolio and business purchases.
A portion of loans in the U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio currently requires a payment to satisfy only the current accrued interest for the payment period, or an interest-only payment. Citi's mortgage portfolio includes approximately $28 billion of first- and second- lien home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) that are still within their revolving period and have not commenced amortization. The interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for the HELOC product across the industry. The first lien mortgage portfolio contains approximately $30 billion of ARMs that are currently required to make an interest-only payment. These loans will be required to make a fully amortizing payment upon expiration of their interest-only payment period, and most will do so within a few years of origination. Borrowers that are currently required to make an interest-only payment cannot select a lower payment that would negatively amortize the loan. First lien mortgage loans with this payment feature are primarily to high credit quality borrowers that have on average significantly higher refreshed FICO scores than other loans in the first lien mortgage portfolio.
Loan Balances
First Lien Mortgages—Loan Balances. As a consequence of the difficult economic environment and the decrease in housing prices, LTV and FICO scores have generally deteriorated since origination, as depicted in the table below. On a refreshed basis, approximately 31% of first lien mortgages had a LTV ratio above 100%, compared to approximately 0% at origination. Approximately 29% of the first lien mortgages had FICO scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis, compared to 16% at origination.
Balances: June 30, 2010—First Lien Mortgages
At Origination | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 58 | % | 6 | % | 7 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 13 | % | 7 | % | 9 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | NM | NM | NM |
Refreshed | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 26 | % | 4 | % | 9 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 18 | % | 3 | % | 9 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | 16 | % | 4 | % | 11 | % |
Note: NM—Not meaningful. First lien mortgage table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico. Table excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs. Table also excludes $1.7 billion from At Origination balances and $0.4 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. Balances exclude deferred fees/costs. Refreshed FICO scores based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Loan Performance Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index.
Second Lien Mortgages—Loan Balances. In the second lien mortgage portfolio, the majority of loans are in the higher FICO categories. The challenging economic conditions have generally caused a migration towards lower FICO scores and higher LTV ratios. Approximately 47% of second lien mortgages had refreshed LTVs above 100%, compared to approximately 0% at origination. Approximately 18% of second lien mortgages had FICO scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis, compared to 3% at origination.
Balances: June 30, 2010—Second Lien Mortgages
At Origination | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 49 | % | 2 | % | 2 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 43 | % | 3 | % | 1 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | NM | NM | NM |
Refreshed | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 22 | % | 1 | % | 3 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 21 | % | 2 | % | 4 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | 32 | % | 4 | % | 11 | % | ||||
Note: N.M.—Not meaningful. Second lien mortgage table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico. Table excludes loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs. Table also excludes $1.6 billion from At Origination balances and $0.4 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. Refreshed FICO scores are based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Loan Performance Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index.
Delinquencies
The tables below provide delinquency statistics for loans 90 or more days past due (90+DPD), as a percentage of outstandings in each of the FICO/LTV combinations, in both the first lien and second lien mortgage portfolios. For example, loans with FICO ³ 660 and LTV £ 80% at origination have a 90+DPD rate of 5.8%.
Loans with FICO scores of less than 620 exhibit significantly higher delinquencies than in any other FICO band. Similarly, loans with LTVs greater than 100% have higher delinquencies than LTVs of less than or equal to 100%.
Delinquencies: 90+DPD Rates—First Lien Mortgages
At Origination | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 5.8 | % | 11.0 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 8.1 | % | 13.5 | % | 16.8 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | NM | NM | NM |
Refreshed | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 0.3 | % | 3.3 | % | 15.0 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 0.8 | % | 7.8 | % | 22.6 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | 2.0 | % | 15.4 | % | 30.3 | % | ||||
Note: NM—Not meaningful. 90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the tables above.
Delinquencies: 90+DPD Rates—Second Lien Mortgages
At Origination | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 1.6 | % | 4.2 | % | 5.1 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 3.7 | % | 4.9 | % | 7.0 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | NM | NM | NM |
Refreshed | FICO³660 | 620£FICO<660 | FICO<620 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTV£ 80% | 0.1 | % | 1.2 | % | 8.2 | % | ||||
80% < LTV£ 100% | 0.1 | % | 1.3 | % | 9.6 | % | ||||
LTV > 100% | 0.4 | % | 3.1 | % | 16.6 | % |
Note: NM—Not meaningful. 90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the tables above.
Origination Channel, Geographic Distribution and Origination Vintage
The following tables detail Citi's first and second lien U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio by origination channels, geographic distribution and origination vintage.
By Origination Channel
Citi's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio has been originated from three main channels: retail, broker and correspondent.
First Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
As of June 30, 2010, approximately 54% of the first lien mortgage portfolio was originated through third-party channels. Given that loans originated through correspondents have exhibited higher 90+DPD delinquency rates than retail originated mortgages, Citi terminated business with a number of correspondent sellers in 2007 and 2008. During 2008, Citi also severed relationships with a number of brokers, only maintaining those who have produced strong, high-quality and profitable volume.
CHANNEL ($ in billions) | First Lien Mortgages | Channel % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Retail | $ | 44.4 | 46.3 | % | 5.2 | % | $ | 13.6 | $ | 9.5 | ||||||
Broker | $ | 16.7 | 17.4 | % | 8.2 | % | $ | 3.1 | $ | 5.6 | ||||||
Correspondent | $ | 34.8 | 36.3 | % | 12.3 | % | $ | 11.6 | $ | 13.9 |
Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans subject to LTSCs.
Second Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
For second lien mortgages, approximately 48% of the loans were originated through third-party channels. As these mortgages have demonstrated a higher incidence of delinquencies, Citi no longer originates second mortgages through third-party channels.
CHANNEL ($ in billions) | Second Lien Mortgages | Channel % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Retail | $ | 23.9 | 52.2 | % | 1.8 | % | $ | 3.8 | $ | 7.1 | ||||||
Broker | $ | 11.3 | 24.8 | % | 3.8 | % | $ | 2.0 | $ | 6.8 | ||||||
Correspondent | $ | 10.5 | 23.0 | % | 4.1 | % | $ | 2.5 | $ | 7.5 |
Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.
By State
Approximately half of the Citi's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio is located in five states: California, New York, Florida, Illinois and Texas. These states represent 50% of first lien mortgages and 55% of second lien mortgages.
Florida and Illinois have above average 90+DPD delinquency rates. Florida has 54% of its first mortgage lien portfolio with refreshed LTV>100%, compared to 30% overall for first lien mortgages. Illinois has 45% of its loan portfolio with refreshed LTV>100%. Texas, despite having 41% of its portfolio with FICO<620, has a lower delinquency rate relative to the overall portfolio. Texas has 5% of its loan portfolio with refreshed LTV>100%.
First Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
STATES ($ in billions) | First Lien Mortgages | State % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | $ | 26.1 | 27.2 | % | 7.2 | % | $ | 4.0 | $ | 10.0 | ||||||
New York | $ | 7.9 | 8.2 | % | 6.4 | % | $ | 1.5 | $ | 0.9 | ||||||
Florida | $ | 5.8 | 6.1 | % | 13.0 | % | $ | 2.1 | $ | 3.1 | ||||||
Illinois | $ | 4.0 | 4.2 | % | 9.8 | % | $ | 1.3 | $ | 1.8 | ||||||
Texas | $ | 3.9 | 4.1 | % | 5.7 | % | $ | 1.6 | $ | 0.2 | ||||||
Others | $ | 48.2 | 50.2 | % | 8.7 | % | $ | 17.9 | $ | 13.1 |
Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans subject to LTSCs.
In the second lien mortgage portfolio, Florida continues to experience above-average delinquencies, with approximately 71% of their loans with refreshed LTV > 100% compared to 47% overall for second lien mortgages.
Second Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
STATES ($ in billions) | Second Lien Mortgages | State % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
California | $ | 12.8 | 27.9 | % | 3.0 | % | $ | 1.8 | $ | 6.4 | ||||||
New York | $ | 6.3 | 13.8 | % | 2.2 | % | $ | 0.9 | $ | 1.4 | ||||||
Florida | $ | 2.9 | 6.4 | % | 4.8 | % | $ | 0.7 | $ | 2.1 | ||||||
Illinois | $ | 1.8 | 3.9 | % | 2.6 | % | $ | 0.3 | $ | 1.1 | ||||||
Texas | $ | 1.3 | 2.8 | % | 1.3 | % | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.4 | ||||||
Others | $ | 20.7 | 45.2 | % | 2.7 | % | $ | 4.4 | $ | 9.9 |
Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.
By Vintage
For Citigroup's combined U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio (first and second lien mortgages), approximately half of the portfolio consists of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which demonstrate above average delinquencies. In first mortgages, approximately 43% of the portfolio is of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which have 90+DPD rates well above the overall portfolio rate. In second mortgages, 62% of the portfolio is of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which again have higher delinquencies compared to the overall portfolio rate.
First Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
VINTAGES ($ in billions) | First Lien Mortgages | Vintage % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | $ | 0.7 | 0.7 | % | 0.0 | % | $ | 0.1 | $ | 0.1 | ||||||
2009 | $ | 3.8 | 4.0 | % | 0.7 | % | $ | 0.5 | $ | 0.2 | ||||||
2008 | $ | 12.3 | 12.9 | % | 4.9 | % | $ | 2.8 | $ | 2.5 | ||||||
2007 | $ | 23.9 | 25.0 | % | 12.2 | % | $ | 8.7 | $ | 11.6 | ||||||
2006 | $ | 17.1 | 17.8 | % | 10.7 | % | $ | 5.4 | $ | 8.1 | ||||||
2005 | $ | 16.5 | 17.2 | % | 6.6 | % | $ | 3.9 | $ | 5.1 | ||||||
£ 2004 | $ | 21.6 | 22.5 | % | 6.9 | % | $ | 6.8 | $ | 1.5 |
Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans subject to LTSCs.
Second Lien Mortgages: June 30, 2010
VINTAGES ($ in billions) | Second Lien Mortgages | Vintage % Total | 90+DPD % | *FICO < 620 | *LTV > 100% | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | $ | 0.1 | 0.3 | % | 0.0 | % | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.0 | ||||||
2009 | $ | 0.6 | 1.3 | % | 0.2 | % | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.0 | ||||||
2008 | $ | 4.0 | 8.8 | % | 1.1 | % | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.7 | ||||||
2007 | $ | 13.4 | 29.4 | % | 3.2 | % | $ | 2.7 | $ | 7.2 | ||||||
2006 | $ | 14.7 | 32.2 | % | 3.4 | % | $ | 2.9 | $ | 8.9 | ||||||
2005 | $ | 8.8 | 19.2 | % | 2.6 | % | $ | 1.4 | $ | 4.0 | ||||||
£ 2004 | $ | 4.0 | 8.7 | % | 1.7 | % | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.5 |
Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.
North America Cards
Overview
Citi's North America cards portfolio consists of our Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios located in Citicorp—Regional Consumer Banking and Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, the Citi-branded portfolio totaled approximately $77 billion, while the retail partner cards portfolio was approximately $50 billion.
Impact of Loss Mitigation and Cards Modification Programs on Cards Portfolios
In each of its Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios, Citi continues to actively eliminate riskier accounts to mitigate losses. Higher risk customers have either had their available lines of credit reduced or their accounts closed. On a net basis, end of period open accounts are down 15% in Citi-branded cards and down 13% in retail partner cards versus prior-year levels.
As previously disclosed, in Citi's experience to date, these portfolios have significantly different characteristics:
As a result, loss mitigation efforts, such as stricter underwriting standards for new accounts, decreasing higher risk credit lines, closing high risk accounts and re-pricing, have tended to affect the retail partner cards portfolio faster than the branded portfolio.
In addition to tightening credit standards, Citi also offers short-term and long-term cards modification programs, as discussed under "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" above. Citigroup monitors the performance of these U.S. credit card short-term and long-term modification programs by tracking cumulative loss rates by vintages (when customers enter a program) and comparing that performance with that of similar accounts whose terms were not modified. For example, as previously reported, for U.S. credit cards, in Citi's experience to date, at 24 months after modifying an account, Citi typically reduces credit losses by approximately one-third compared to similar accounts that were not modified. This improved performance of modified loans relative to those not modified has generally been the greatest during the first 12 months after modification. Following that period, losses have tended to increase, but have typically stabilized at levels which are still below those for similar loans that were not modified, resulting in an improved cumulative loss performance. In addition, during the second quarter of 2010, Citi placed fewer accounts into these programs and the results for these programs have remained positive.
Overall, however, Citi continues to believe that net credit losses in each of its cards portfolios will likely continue to remain at elevated levels and will continue to be highly dependent on macroeconomic conditions and industry changes, including continued implementation of the CARD Act.
Cards Quarterly Trends—Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses
The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for Citigroup'sNorth America Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios.
During the second quarter of 2010, Citi continued to see stable to improving trends across both portfolios, based in part, it believes, on its loss mitigation programs, as previously discussed. Across both portfolios, delinquencies declined during the second quarter of 2010. In Citi-branded cards, net credit losses declined sequentially. On a percentage basis, however, net credit losses were up in Citi-branded cards due to declining loan balances. In retail partner cards, net credit losses declined for the fourth consecutive quarter.
Note: Includes Puerto Rico.
Note: Includes Canada and Puerto Rico. Includes Installment Lending.
North America Cards—FICO Information
As set forth in the table below, approximately 73% of the Citi-branded portfolio had FICO credit scores of at least 660 on a refreshed basis as of June 30, 2010, while 65% of the retail partner cards portfolio had scores above 660.
Balances: June 30, 2010
Refreshed | Citi Branded | Retail Partners | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO ³ 660 | 73 | % | 65 | % | |||
620 £ FICO < 660 | 11 | % | 13 | % | |||
FICO < 620 | 16 | % | 22 | % |
Note: Based on balances of $120 billion. Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico and Installment and Classified portfolios. Excludes balances where FICO was unavailable ($2.4 billion for Citi-branded, $2.1 billion for retail partner cards).
The table below provides delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD for both the Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios as of June 30, 2010. Given the economic environment, customers have generally migrated down from higher FICO score ranges, driven by their delinquencies with Citi and/or with other creditors. As these customers roll through the delinquency buckets, they materially damage their credit score and may ultimately go to charge-off. Loans 90+DPD are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquency has been reported by Citigroup to the credit bureaus. Loans with FICO scores less than 620, which constitute 16% of the Citi-branded portfolio, have a 90+DPD rate of 16.3%; in the retail partner cards portfolio, loans with FICO scores less than 620 constitute 22% of the portfolio and have a 90+DPD rate of 16.7%.
90+DPD Delinquency Rate: June 30, 2010
Refreshed | Citi Branded 90+DPD% | Retail Partners 90+DPD% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO ³ 660 | 0.2 | % | 0.2 | % | |||
620 £ FICO < 660 | 0.7 | % | 0.8 | % | |||
FICO < 620 | 16.3 | % | 16.7 | % |
Note: Based on balances of $120 billion. Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico and Installment and Classified portfolios.
U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans
In the table below, the U.S. installment portfolio consists of consumer loans in the following businesses: Consumer Finance, Retail Banking, Auto, Student Lending and Cards. Other Revolving consists of consumer loans (Ready Credit and Checking Plus products) in the Consumer Retail Banking business. Commercial-related loans are not included.
As of June 30, 2010, the U.S. Installment portfolio totaled approximately $64 billion, while the U.S. Other Revolving portfolio was approximately $0.9 billion. While substantially all of the U.S. Installment portfolio is reported inLCL within Citi Holdings, it does include $0.4 billion of Consumer Retail Banking loans which are reported in Citicorp. The U.S. Other Revolving portfolio is managed under Citicorp. As of June 30, 2010, the U.S. Installment portfolio included approximately $33 billion of Student Loans originated under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) where losses are substantially mitigated by federal guarantees if the loans are properly serviced. In addition, there were approximately $6 billion of non-FFELP Student Loans where losses are mitigated by private insurance. These insurance providers insure Citi against a significant portion of losses arising from borrower loan default, bankruptcy or death.
Approximately 37% of the Installment portfolio had FICO credit scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis. Approximately 26% of the Other Revolving portfolio is composed of loans having FICO less than 620.
Balances: June 30, 2010
Refreshed | Installment | Other Revolving | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO ³ 660 | 50 | % | 59 | % | |||
620 £ FICO < 660 | 13 | % | 15 | % | |||
FICO < 620 | 37 | % | 26 | % |
Note: Based on balances of $62 billion for Installment and $0.8 billion for Other Revolving. Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico. Excludes balances where FICO was unavailable ($1.6 billion for Installment, $0.1 billion for Other Revolving).
The table below provides delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD for both the Installment and Other Revolving portfolios. Loans 90+DPD are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquency has been reported by Citigroup to the credit bureaus. On a refreshed basis, loans with FICO scores of less than 620 exhibit significantly higher delinquencies than in any other FICO band and will drive the majority of the losses.
90+DPD Delinquency Rate: June 30, 2010
Refreshed | Installment 90+DPD% | Other Revolving 90+DPD% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO ³ 660 | 0.2 | % | 0.4 | % | |||
620 £ FICO < 660 | 1.3 | % | 1.3 | % | |||
FICO < 620 | 7.7 | % | 6.6 | % |
Note: Based on balances of $62 billion for Installment and $0.8 billion for Other Revolving. Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico.
Interest Rate Risk Associated with Consumer Mortgage Lending Activity
Citigroup originates and funds mortgage loans. As with all other lending activity, this exposes Citigroup to several risks, including credit, liquidity and interest rate risks. To manage credit and liquidity risk, Citigroup sells most of the mortgage loans it originates, but retains the servicing rights. These sale transactions create an intangible asset referred to as mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). The fair value of this asset is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. The fair value of MSRs declines with increased prepayments, and lower interest rates are generally one factor that tends to lead to increased prepayments. Thus, by retaining risks of sold mortgage loans, Citigroup is exposed to interest rate risk.
In managing this risk, Citigroup hedges a significant portion of the value of its MSRs through the use of interest rate derivative contracts, forward purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and purchased securities classified as trading (primarily mortgage-backed securities including principal-only strips).
Since the change in the value of these hedging instruments does not perfectly match the change in the value of the MSRs, Citigroup is still exposed to what is commonly referred to as "basis risk." Citigroup manages this risk by reviewing the mix of the various hedging instruments referred to above on a daily basis.
Citigroup's MSRs totaled $4.894 billion and $6.530 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. For additional information on Citi's MSRs, see Notes 11 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
As part of the mortgage lending activity, Citigroup commonly enters into purchase commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at specific interest rates within a given period of time, generally up to 60 days after the rate has been set. If the resulting loans from these commitments will be classified as loans held-for-sale, Citigroup accounts for the commitments as derivatives. Accordingly, the initial and subsequent changes in the fair value of these commitments, which are driven by changes in mortgage interest rates, are recognized in current earnings after taking into consideration the likelihood that the commitment will be funded.
Citigroup hedges its exposure to the change in the value of these commitments by utilizing hedging instruments similar to those referred to above.
The following table presents credit data for Citigroup's corporate loans and unfunded lending commitments at June 30, 2010. The ratings scale is based on Citi's internal risk ratings, which generally correspond to the ratings as defined by S&P and Moody's.
| At June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corporate loans(1) in millions of dollars | Recorded investment in loans(2) | % of total(3) | Unfunded lending commitments | % of total(3) | |||||||||||
Investment grade(4) | $ | 118,470 | 69 | % | $ | 231,863 | 87 | % | |||||||
Non-investment grade(4) | |||||||||||||||
Noncriticized | 21,312 | 12 | 16,911 | 6 | |||||||||||
Criticized performing(5) | 21,065 | 12 | 14,108 | 6 | |||||||||||
Commercial real estate (CRE) | 5,623 | 3 | 1,781 | 1 | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial and Other | 15,442 | 9 | 12,327 | 5 | |||||||||||
Non-accrual (criticized)(5) | 11,036 | 6 | 3,043 | 1 | |||||||||||
CRE | 2,568 | 1 | 988 | — | |||||||||||
Commercial and Industrial and Other | 8,468 | 5 | 2,055 | 1 | |||||||||||
Total non-investment grade | $ | 53,413 | 31 | % | $ | 34,062 | 13 | % | |||||||
Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis(4) | 13,738 | 2,216 | |||||||||||||
Loans at fair value | 2,358 | — | |||||||||||||
Total corporate loans | $ | 187,979 | $ | 268,141 | |||||||||||
Unearned income | (1,259 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
Corporate loans, net of unearned income | $ | 186,720 | $ | 268,141 | |||||||||||
The following tables represent the corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking), before consideration of collateral, by maturity at June 30, 2010. The corporate portfolio is broken out by direct outstandings that include drawn loans, overdrafts, interbank placements, bankers' acceptances, certain investment securities and leases and unfunded commitments that include unused commitments to lend, letters of credit and financial guarantees.
| At June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Due within 1 year | Greater than 1 year but within 5 years | Greater than 5 years | Total exposure | |||||||||
Direct outstandings | $ | 177 | $ | 46 | $ | 8 | $ | 231 | |||||
Unfunded lending commitments | 159 | 94 | 10 | 263 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 336 | $ | 140 | $ | 18 | $ | 494 | |||||
| At December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Due within 1 year | Greater than 1 year but within 5 years | Greater than 5 years | Total exposure | |||||||||
Direct outstandings | $ | 213 | $ | 66 | $ | 7 | $ | 286 | |||||
Unfunded lending commitments | 182 | 120 | 10 | 312 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 395 | $ | 186 | $ | 17 | $ | 598 | |||||
Portfolio Mix
The corporate credit portfolio is diverse across counterparty, and industry and geography. The following table shows direct outstandings and unfunded commitments by region:
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
North America | 47 | % | 51 | % | |||
EMEA | 30 | 27 | |||||
Latin America | 7 | 9 | |||||
Asia | 16 | 13 | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
The maintenance of accurate and consistent risk ratings across the corporate credit portfolio facilitates the comparison of credit exposure across all lines of business, geographic regions and products.
Obligor risk ratings reflect an estimated probability of default for an obligor and are derived primarily through the use of statistical models (which are validated periodically), external rating agencies (under defined circumstances) or approved scoring methodologies. Facility risk ratings are assigned, using the obligor risk rating, and then factors that affect the loss given default of the facility, such as support or collateral, are taken into account. With regard to climate change risk, factors evaluated include consideration of the business impact, impact of regulatory requirements, or lack thereof, and impact of physical effects on obligors and their assets.
These factors may adversely affect the ability of some obligors to perform and thus increase the risk of lending activities to these obligors. Citigroup also has incorporated climate risk assessment criteria for certain obligors, as necessary.
Internal obligor ratings equivalent to BBB and above are considered investment grade. Ratings below the equivalent of the BBB category are considered non-investment grade.
The following table presents the corporate credit portfolio by facility risk rating at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, as a percentage of the total portfolio:
| Direct outstandings and unfunded commitments | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
AAA/AA/A | 55 | % | 58 | % | |||
BBB | 25 | 24 | |||||
BB/B | 13 | 11 | |||||
CCC or below | 7 | 7 | |||||
Unrated | — | — | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
The corporate credit portfolio is diversified by industry, with a concentration only in the financial sector, including banks, other financial institutions, insurance companies, investment banks, and government and central banks. The following table shows the allocation of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments to industries as a percentage of the total corporate portfolio:
| Direct outstandings and unfunded commitments | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
Government and central banks | 12 | % | 12 | % | |||
Banks | 8 | 9 | |||||
Investment banks | 7 | 5 | |||||
Other financial institutions | 5 | 12 | |||||
Petroleum | 5 | 4 | |||||
Utilities | 4 | 4 | |||||
Insurance | 4 | 4 | |||||
Agriculture and food preparation | 4 | 4 | |||||
Telephone and cable | 3 | 3 | |||||
Industrial machinery and equipment | 3 | 2 | |||||
Real estate | 3 | 3 | |||||
Global information technology | 2 | 2 | |||||
Chemicals | 2 | 2 | |||||
Other industries(1) | 38 | 34 | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
Credit Risk Mitigation
As part of its overall risk management activities, Citigroup uses credit derivatives and other risk mitigants to hedge portions of the credit risk in its portfolio, in addition to outright asset sales. The purpose of these transactions is to transfer credit risk to third parties. The results of the mark-to-market and any realized gains or losses on credit derivatives are reflected in thePrincipal transactions line on the Consolidated Statement of Income.
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, $49.2 billion and $59.6 billion, respectively, of credit risk exposure were economically hedged. Citigroup's loss model used in the calculation of its loan loss reserve does not include the favorable impact of credit derivatives and other risk mitigants. In addition, the reported amounts of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments in this report do not reflect the impact of these hedging transactions. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying credit exposure with the following risk rating distribution, respectively:
Rating of Hedged Exposure
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAA/AA/A | 48 | % | 45 | % | |||
BBB | 36 | 37 | |||||
BB/B | 11 | 11 | |||||
CCC or below | 5 | 7 | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying credit exposure with the following industry distribution:
Industry of Hedged Exposure
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Utilities | 6 | % | 9 | % | |||
Telephone and cable | 7 | 9 | |||||
Agriculture and food preparation | 8 | 8 | |||||
Chemicals | 7 | 8 | |||||
Petroleum | 6 | 6 | |||||
Industrial machinery and equipment | 4 | 6 | |||||
Autos | 7 | 6 | |||||
Retail | 5 | 4 | |||||
Insurance | 4 | 4 | |||||
Other financial institutions | 7 | 4 | |||||
Pharmaceuticals | 4 | 5 | |||||
Natural gas distribution | 4 | 3 | |||||
Metals | 4 | 4 | |||||
Global information technology | 3 | 3 | |||||
Other industries(1) | 24 | 21 | |||||
Total | 100 | % | 100 | % | |||
Market risk encompasses liquidity risk and price risk, both of which arise in the normal course of business of a global financial intermediary. Liquidity risk is the risk that an entity may be unable to meet a financial commitment to a customer, creditor, or investor when due. Liquidity risk is discussed in "Capital Resources and Liquidity" above. Price risk is the earnings risk from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, and in their implied volatilities. Price risk arises in non-trading portfolios, as well as in trading portfolios.
Interest Rate Exposure (IRE) for Non-Trading Portfolios
The exposures in the following table represent the approximate annualized risk to net interest revenue (NIR), assuming an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100 basis points change, as well as a more gradual 100 basis points (25 basis points per quarter) parallel change in rates compared with the market forward interest rates in selected currencies.
| June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Increase | Decrease | Increase | Decrease | Increase | Decrease | |||||||||||
U.S. dollar | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | (264 | ) | NM | $ | (488 | ) | NM | $ | (1,191 | ) | NM | |||||
Gradual change | $ | (179 | ) | NM | $ | (110 | ) | NM | $ | (694 | ) | NM | |||||
Mexican peso | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | 60 | $(60) | $ | 42 | (42) | $ | (21 | ) | 21 | |||||||
Gradual change | $ | 33 | $(33) | $ | 21 | (21) | $ | (15 | ) | 15 | |||||||
Euro | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | 13 | NM | $ | (56 | ) | NM | $ | 26 | $ | (25 | ) | |||||
Gradual change | $ | 3 | NM | $ | (50 | ) | NM | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 4 | |||||
Japanese yen | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | 133 | NM | $ | 148 | NM | $ | 207 | NM | ||||||||
Gradual change | $ | 89 | NM | $ | 97 | NM | $ | 119 | NM | ||||||||
Pound sterling | |||||||||||||||||
Instantaneous change | $ | 16 | NM | $ | (3 | ) | NM | $ | (8 | ) | 8 | ||||||
Gradual change | $ | 8 | NM | $ | (5 | ) | NM | $ | (14 | ) | 14 | ||||||
NM Not meaningful. A 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would imply negative rates for the yield curve.
The changes in the U.S. dollar IRE from the previous quarter reflect changes in the customer-related asset and liability mix, the expected impact of market rates on customer behavior and Citigroup's view of prevailing interest rates. The changes from the prior-year quarter primarily reflect modeling of mortgages and deposits based on lower rates, pricing changes due to the CARD Act, debt issuance and swapping activities, offset by repositioning of the liquidity portfolio.
Certain trading-oriented businesses within Citi have accrual-accounted positions. The U.S. dollar IRE associated with these businesses is ($147) million for a 100 basis point instantaneous increase in interest rates.
The following table shows the risk to NIR from six different changes in the implied-forward rates. Each scenario assumes that the rate change will occur on a gradual basis every three months over the course of one year.
| Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | Scenario 3 | Scenario 4 | Scenario 5 | Scenario 6 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Overnight rate change (bps) | — | 100 | 200 | (200 | ) | (100 | ) | — | |||||||||||
10-year rate change (bps) | (100 | ) | — | 100 | (100 | ) | — | 100 | |||||||||||
Impact to net interest revenue | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (86 | ) | $ | (371 | ) | NM | NM | $ | (49 | ) | |||||
NM Not meaningful. A 100 basis point or more decrease in the overnight rate would imply negative rates for the yield curve.
Value at Risk for Trading Portfolios
For Citigroup's major trading centers, the aggregate pretax value at risk (VAR) in the trading portfolios was $214 million, $172 million, $205 million, and $277 million at June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and June 30, 2009, respectively. Daily Citigroup trading VAR averaged $188 million and ranged from $163 million to $219 million during the second quarter of 2010.
The following table summarizes VAR for Citigroup trading portfolios at June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, and June 30, 2009, including the total VAR, the specific risk-only component of VAR, the isolated general market factor VARs, along with the quarterly averages. On April 30, 2010, Citigroup concluded its implementation of exponentially weighted market factor volatilities for Interest rate and FX positions to the VAR calculation. This methodology uses the higher of short- and long-term annualized volatilities. This enhancement resulted in a 31% increase inS&B VAR, and a 24% increase in Citigroup consolidated VAR, reported at June 30, 2010.
In million of dollars | June 30, 2010 | Second Quarter 2010 Average | March 31, 2010 | First Quarter 2010 Average | June 30, 2009 | Second Quarter 2009 Average | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest rate | $ | 244 | $ | 224 | $ | 201 | $ | 193 | $ | 226 | $ | 217 | |||||||
Foreign exchange | 57 | 57 | 53 | 51 | 84 | 61 | |||||||||||||
Equity | 71 | 64 | 49 | 73 | 65 | 94 | |||||||||||||
Commodity | 24 | 21 | 17 | 18 | 36 | 38 | |||||||||||||
Diversification benefit | (182 | ) | (178 | ) | (148 | ) | (135 | ) | (134 | ) | (150 | ) | |||||||
Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk | $ | 214 | $ | 188 | $ | 172 | $ | 200 | $ | 277 | $ | 260 | |||||||
Specific risk-only component(1) | $ | 17 | $ | 16 | $ | 15 | $ | 20 | $ | 18 | $ | 20 | |||||||
Total—General market factors only | $ | 197 | $ | 172 | $ | 157 | $ | 180 | $ | 259 | $ | 240 | |||||||
The table below provides the range of market factor VARs, inclusive of specific risk, across the quarters ended:
| June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Low | High | Low | High | Low | High | |||||||||||||
Interest rate | $ | 198 | $ | 270 | $ | 171 | $ | 228 | $ | 193 | $ | 240 | |||||||
Foreign exchange | 36 | 94 | 37 | 78 | 31 | 91 | |||||||||||||
Equity | 48 | 89 | 47 | 111 | 50 | 153 | |||||||||||||
Commodity | 15 | 27 | 15 | 20 | 26 | 50 | |||||||||||||
The following table provides the VAR forS&B for the second quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2010:
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | March 31, 2010 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk | $ | 176 | $ | 104 | |||
Average—during quarter | 139 | 144 | |||||
High—during quarter | 180 | 235 | |||||
Low—during quarter | 100 | 99 | |||||
INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS
Average Rates—Interest Revenue, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Margin
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009(1) | Change 2Q10 vs. 2Q09 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest revenue(2) | $ | 20,418 | $ | 20,852 | $ | 19,671 | 4 | % | |||||
Interest expense(3) | 6,379 | 6,291 | 6,842 | (7 | )% | ||||||||
Net interest revenue(2)(3) | $ | 14,039 | $ | 14,561 | 12,829 | 9 | % | ||||||
Interest revenue—average rate | 4.57 | % | 4.75 | % | 4.97 | % | (40 | ) bps | |||||
Interest expense—average rate | 1.60 | % | 1.60 | % | 1.93 | % | (33 | ) bps | |||||
Net interest margin | 3.15 | % | 3.32 | % | 3.24 | % | (9 | ) bps | |||||
Interest-rate benchmarks: | |||||||||||||
Federal Funds rate—end of period | 0.00-0.25 | % | 0.00-0.25 | % | 0.00-0.25 | % | — | ||||||
Federal Funds rate—average rate | 0.00-0.25 | % | 0.00-0.25 | % | 0.00-0.25 | % | — | ||||||
Two-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate | 0.87 | % | 0.92 | % | 1.02 | % | (15 | ) bps | |||||
10-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate | 3.49 | % | 3.72 | % | 3.32 | % | 17 | bps | |||||
10-year vs. two-year spread | 262 | bps | 280 | bps | 230 | bps | |||||||
A significant portion of the Company's business activities are based upon gathering deposits and borrowing money and then lending or investing those funds, including market-making activities in tradable securities. Net interest margin (NIM) is calculated by dividing annualized gross interest revenue less gross interest expense by average interest earning assets.
NIM decreased by 17 basis points during the second quarter of 2010 due to the continued de-risking of loan portfolios, the expansion of loss mitigation efforts and the Primerica divestiture.
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)
| Average Volume | Interest Revenue | % Average Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits with banks(5) | $ | 168,330 | $ | 166,378 | $ | 168,631 | $ | 291 | $ | 290 | $ | 377 | 0.69 | % | 0.71 | % | 0.90 | % | |||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 186,283 | $ | 160,033 | $ | 131,522 | $ | 452 | $ | 471 | $ | 515 | 0.97 | % | 1.19 | % | 1.57 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 83,055 | 78,052 | 61,382 | 329 | 281 | 279 | 1.59 | 1.46 | 1.82 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 269,338 | $ | 238,085 | $ | 192,904 | $ | 781 | $ | 752 | $ | 794 | 1.16 | % | 1.28 | % | 1.65 | % | |||||||||||
Trading account assets(7)(8) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 130,475 | $ | 131,776 | $ | 134,334 | $ | 1,019 | $ | 1,069 | $ | 1,785 | 3.13 | % | 3.29 | % | 5.33 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 149,628 | 152,403 | 120,468 | 992 | 803 | 1,136 | 2.66 | 2.14 | 3.78 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 280,103 | $ | 284,179 | $ | 254,802 | $ | 2,011 | $ | 1,872 | $ | 2,921 | 2.88 | % | 2.67 | % | 4.60 | % | |||||||||||
Investments(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable | $ | 157,621 | $ | 150,858 | $ | 123,181 | $ | 1,301 | $ | 1,389 | $ | 1,674 | 3.31 | % | 3.73 | % | 5.45 | % | |||||||||||
Exempt from U.S. income tax | 15,305 | 15,570 | 16,293 | 197 | 173 | 247 | 5.16 | 4.51 | 6.08 | ||||||||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 138,477 | 144,892 | 118,891 | 1,488 | 1,547 | 1,514 | 4.31 | 4.33 | 5.11 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 311,403 | $ | 311,320 | $ | 258,365 | $ | 2,986 | $ | 3,109 | $ | 3,435 | 3.85 | % | 4.05 | % | 5.33 | % | |||||||||||
Loans (net of unearned income)(9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 460,147 | $ | 479,384 | $ | 385,347 | $ | 9,153 | $ | 9,511 | $ | 6,254 | 7.98 | % | 8.05 | % | 6.51 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 249,353 | 254,488 | 270,594 | 5,074 | 5,162 | 5,675 | 8.16 | 8.23 | 8.41 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 709,500 | $ | 733,872 | $ | 655,941 | $ | 14,227 | $ | 14,673 | $ | 11,929 | 8.04 | % | 8.11 | % | 7.29 | % | |||||||||||
Other interest-earning Assets | $ | 51,519 | $ | 45,894 | $ | 57,416 | $ | 122 | $ | 156 | $ | 215 | 0.95 | % | 1.38 | % | 1.50 | % | |||||||||||
Total interest-earning Assets | $ | 1,790,193 | $ | 1,779,728 | $ | 1,588,059 | $ | 20,418 | $ | 20,852 | $ | 19,671 | 4.57 | % | 4.75 | % | 4.97 | % | |||||||||||
Non-interest-earning assets(7) | 226,902 | 233,344 | 262,840 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets from discontinued operations | — | — | $ | 19,048 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,017,095 | $ | 2,013,072 | $ | 1,869,947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)
| Average Volume | Interest Expense | % Average Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 | 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U. S. offices | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits(5) | $ | 186,070 | $ | 178,266 | $ | 173,168 | $ | 461 | $ | 458 | $ | 999 | 0.99 | % | 1.04 | % | 2.31 | % | |||||||||||
Other time deposits | 48,171 | 54,391 | 57,869 | 100 | 143 | 278 | 0.83 | 1.07 | 1.93 | ||||||||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 475,562 | 481,002 | 428,188 | 1,475 | 1,479 | 1,563 | 1.24 | 1.25 | 1.46 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 709,803 | $ | 713,659 | $ | 659,225 | $ | 2,036 | $ | 2,080 | $ | 2,840 | 1.15 | % | 1.18 | % | 1.73 | % | |||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 137,610 | $ | 120,695 | $ | 133,948 | $ | 237 | $ | 179 | $ | 288 | 0.69 | % | 0.60 | % | 0.86 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 100,759 | 79,447 | 74,346 | 560 | 475 | 643 | 2.23 | 2.42 | 3.47 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 238,369 | $ | 200,142 | $ | 208,294 | $ | 797 | $ | 654 | $ | 931 | 1.34 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.79 | % | |||||||||||
Trading account liabilities(8)(9) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 39,709 | $ | 32,642 | $ | 19,592 | $ | 88 | $ | 44 | $ | 50 | 0.89 | % | 0.55 | % | 1.02 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 43,528 | 46,905 | 36,652 | 18 | 19 | 19 | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 83,237 | $ | 79,547 | $ | 56,244 | $ | 106 | $ | 63 | $ | 69 | 0.51 | % | 0.32 | % | 0.49 | % | |||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 122,260 | $ | 152,785 | $ | 136,200 | $ | 181 | $ | 204 | $ | 209 | 0.59 | % | 0.54 | % | 0.62 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 33,630 | 27,659 | 35,299 | 34 | 72 | 106 | 0.41 | 1.06 | 1.20 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 155,890 | $ | 180,444 | $ | 171,499 | $ | 215 | $ | 276 | $ | 315 | 0.55 | % | 0.62 | % | 0.74 | % | |||||||||||
Long-term debt(10) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 391,524 | $ | 397,113 | $ | 296,324 | $ | 3,011 | $ | 3,005 | $ | 2,427 | 3.08 | % | 3.07 | % | 3.29 | % | |||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 23,369 | 25,955 | 29,318 | 214 | 213 | �� | 260 | 3.67 | 3.33 | 3.56 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 414,893 | $ | 423,068 | $ | 325,642 | $ | 3,225 | $ | 3,218 | $ | 2,687 | 3.12 | % | 3.08 | % | 3.31 | % | |||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 1,602,192 | $ | 1,596,860 | $ | 1,420,904 | $ | 6,379 | $ | 6,291 | $ | 6,842 | 1.60 | % | 1.60 | % | 1.93 | % | |||||||||||
Demand deposits in U.S. offices | 14,986 | 16,675 | 19,584 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8) | 243,892 | 247,365 | 267,055 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities from discontinued operations | — | — | 12,122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 1,861,070 | $ | 1,860,900 | $ | 1,719,665 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Citigroup equity(11) | $ | 153,798 | $ | 149,993 | $ | 148,448 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling Interest | $ | 2,227 | $ | 2,179 | 1,834 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Equity | $ | 156,025 | $ | 152,172 | $ | 150,282 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Equity | $ | 2,017,095 | $ | 2,013,072 | $ | 1,869,947 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | 1,087,675 | $ | 1,080,673 | $ | 944,819 | 8,136 | $ | 8,660 | $ | 6,452 | 3.00 | % | 3.25 | % | 2.74 | % | |||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 702,518 | 699,055 | 643,240 | 5,903 | 5,901 | 6,377 | 3.37 | % | 3.42 | 3.98 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,790,193 | $ | 1,779,728 | $ | 1,588,059 | $ | 14,039 | $ | 14,561 | $ | 12,829 | 3.15 | % | 3.32 | % | 3.24 | % | |||||||||||
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)
| Average Volume | Interest Revenue | % Average Rate | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits with banks(5) | $ | 167,354 | $ | 168,887 | $ | 581 | $ | 813 | 0.70 | % | 0.97 | % | ||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 173,158 | $ | 129,763 | $ | 923 | $ | 1,065 | 1.07 | % | 1.66 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 80,554 | 56,907 | 610 | 614 | 1.53 | 2.18 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 253,712 | $ | 186,670 | $ | 1,533 | $ | 1,679 | 1.22 | % | 1.81 | % | ||||||||
Trading account assets(7)(8) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 131,126 | $ | 140,925 | $ | 2,088 | $ | 3,769 | 3.21 | % | 5.39 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 151,015 | 114,460 | 1,795 | 2,103 | 2.40 | 3.71 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 282,141 | $ | 255,385 | $ | 3,883 | $ | 5,872 | 2.78 | % | 4.64 | % | ||||||||
Investments(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | ||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable | $ | 154,239 | $ | 122,541 | $ | 2,690 | $ | 3,154 | 3.52 | % | 5.19 | % | ||||||||
Exempt from U.S. income tax | 15,438 | 15,434 | 370 | 365 | 4.83 | 4.77 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 141,685 | 112,921 | 3,035 | 3,092 | 4.32 | 5.52 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 311,362 | $ | 250,896 | $ | 6,095 | $ | 6,611 | 3.95 | % | 5.31 | % | ||||||||
Loans (net of unearned income)(9) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 469,765 | $ | 394,408 | $ | 18,663 | $ | 13,085 | 8.01 | % | 6.69 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(5) | 251,921 | 269,421 | 10,237 | 11,699 | 8.19 | 8.76 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 721,686 | $ | 663,829 | $ | 28,900 | $ | 24,784 | 8.08 | % | 7.53 | % | ||||||||
Other interest-earning assets | $ | 48,707 | $ | 54,524 | $ | 278 | $ | 495 | 1.15 | % | 1.83 | % | ||||||||
Total interest-earning assets | $ | 1,784,962 | $ | 1,580,191 | $ | 41,270 | $ | 40,254 | 4.66 | % | 5.14 | % | ||||||||
Non-interest-earning assets(7) | 230,122 | 289,207 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets from discontinued operations | — | 19,566 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,015,084 | $ | 1,888,964 | ||||||||||||||||
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)
| Average Volume | Interest Expense | % Average Rate | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | Six Months 2010 | Six Months 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U. S. offices | ||||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits(5) | $ | 182,168 | $ | 169,073 | $ | 919 | $ | 1,632 | 1.02 | % | 1.95 | % | ||||||||
Other time deposits | 51,281 | 59,576 | 243 | 694 | 0.96 | 2.35 | ||||||||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 478,282 | 418,514 | 2,954 | 3,362 | 1.25 | 1.62 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 711,731 | $ | 647,163 | $ | 4,116 | $ | 5,688 | 1.17 | % | 1.77 | % | ||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 129,153 | $ | 143,102 | $ | 416 | $ | 604 | 0.65 | % | 0.85 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 90,103 | 71,265 | 1,035 | 1,431 | 2.32 | 4.05 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 219,256 | $ | 214,367 | $ | 1,451 | $ | 2,035 | 1.33 | % | 1.91 | % | ||||||||
Trading account liabilities(8)(9) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 36,176 | $ | 20,152 | $ | 132 | $ | 143 | 0.74 | % | 1.43 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 45,216 | 33,877 | 37 | 34 | 0.17 | 0.20 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 81,392 | $ | 54,029 | $ | 169 | $ | 177 | 0.42 | % | 0.66 | % | ||||||||
Short-term borrowings | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 137,522 | $ | 142,437 | $ | 385 | $ | 576 | 0.56 | % | 0.82 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 30,645 | 35,257 | 106 | 202 | 0.70 | 1.16 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 168,167 | $ | 177,694 | $ | 491 | $ | 778 | 0.59 | % | 0.88 | % | ||||||||
Long-term debt(10) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 394,318 | $ | 302,997 | $ | 6,016 | $ | 5,247 | 3.08 | % | 3.49 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 24,662 | 31,688 | 427 | 574 | 3.49 | 3.65 | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 418,980 | $ | 334,685 | 6,443 | $ | 5,821 | 3.10 | % | 3.51 | % | |||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities | $ | 1,599,526 | $ | 1,427,938 | 12,670 | $ | 14,499 | 1.60 | % | 2.05 | % | |||||||||
Demand deposits in U.S. offices | 15,831 | 17,486 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other non-interest bearing liabilities(8) | 245,629 | 283,835 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities from discontinued operations | — | 11,910 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 1,860,986 | $ | 1,741,169 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Citigroup equity(11) | $ | 151,895 | $ | 145,873 | ||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | 2,203 | 1,922 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Equity | $ | 154,098 | $ | 147,795 | ||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 2,015,084 | $ | 1,888,964 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 1,084,175 | $ | 957,624 | $ | 16,796 | $ | 13,095 | 3.12 | % | 2.76 | % | ||||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(6) | 700,787 | 622,567 | 11,804 | 12,660 | 3.40 | % | 4.10 | |||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,784,962 | $ | 1,580,191 | $ | 28,600 | $ | 25,755 | 3.23 | % | 3.29 | % | ||||||||
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)
| 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | |||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | |||||||||||||
Deposits with banks(4) | $ | 3 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (85 | ) | $ | (86 | ) | |||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 71 | $ | (90 | ) | $ | (19 | ) | $ | 172 | $ | (235 | ) | $ | (63 | ) | |||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 19 | 29 | 48 | 89 | (39 | ) | 50 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 90 | $ | (61 | ) | $ | 29 | $ | 261 | $ | (274 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | ||||
Trading account assets(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (40 | ) | $ | (50 | ) | $ | (50 | ) | $ | (716 | ) | $ | (766 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (15 | ) | 204 | 189 | 238 | (382 | ) | (144 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | (25 | ) | $ | 164 | $ | 139 | $ | 188 | $ | (1,098 | ) | $ | (910 | ) | ||||
Investments(1) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 59 | $ | (123 | ) | $ | (64 | ) | $ | 394 | $ | (817 | ) | $ | (423 | ) | |||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (69 | ) | 10 | (59 | ) | 229 | (255 | ) | (26 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (113 | ) | $ | (123 | ) | $ | 623 | $ | (1,072 | ) | $ | (449 | ) | ||
Loans (net of unearned income)(6) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (383 | ) | $ | 25 | $ | (358 | ) | $ | 1,341 | $ | 1,558 | $ | 2,899 | |||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (104 | ) | 16 | (88 | ) | (436 | ) | (165 | ) | (601 | ) | ||||||||
Total | $ | (487 | ) | $ | 41 | $ | (446 | ) | 905 | $ | 1,393 | $ | 2,298 | ||||||
Other interest-earning assets | $ | 17 | $ | (51 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (20 | ) | $ | (73 | ) | $ | (93 | ) | ||
Total interest revenue | $ | (412 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | (434 | ) | $ | 1,956 | $ | (1,209 | ) | $ | 747 | |||
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)
| 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 1st Qtr. 2010 | 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | |||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change | |||||||||||||
Deposits | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 4 | $ | (44 | ) | $ | (40 | ) | $ | 17 | $ | (733 | ) | (716 | ) | ||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (17 | ) | 13 | (4 | ) | 162 | (250 | ) | (88 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | (13 | ) | $ | (31 | ) | $ | (44 | ) | $ | 179 | $ | (983 | ) | (804 | ) | |||
Federal funds purchased and | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 27 | $ | 31 | $ | 58 | $ | 8 | $ | (59 | ) | (51 | ) | ||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 120 | (35 | ) | 85 | 188 | (271 | ) | (83 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 147 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 143 | $ | 196 | $ | (330 | ) | (134 | ) | |||||
Trading account liabilities(5) | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 11 | $ | 33 | $ | 44 | $ | 45 | $ | (7 | ) | 38 | |||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (1 | ) | — | (1 | ) | 3 | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | 10 | $ | 33 | $ | 43 | $ | 48 | $ | (11 | ) | 37 | |||||||
Short-term borrowings | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (44 | ) | $ | 21 | $ | (23 | ) | $ | (21 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | (28 | ) | |||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 13 | (51 | ) | (38 | ) | (5 | ) | (67 | ) | (72 | ) | ||||||||
Total | $ | (31 | ) | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (61 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | $ | (74 | ) | (100 | ) | ||
Long-term debt | |||||||||||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (43 | ) | $ | 49 | $ | 6 | $ | 740 | $ | (156 | ) | 584 | ||||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (22 | ) | 23 | 1 | (54 | ) | 8 | (46 | ) | ||||||||||
Total | $ | (65 | ) | $ | 72 | $ | 7 | $ | 686 | $ | (148 | ) | 538 | ||||||
Total interest expense | $ | 48 | $ | 40 | $ | 88 | $ | 1,083 | $ | (1,546 | ) | (463 | ) | ||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | (460 | ) | $ | (62 | ) | $ | (522 | ) | $ | 873 | $ | 337 | 1,210 | |||||
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE, INTEREST EXPENSE, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)
| Six Months 2010 vs. Six Months 2009 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in: | | ||||||||
In millions of dollars | Average Volume | Average Rate | Net Change(2) | |||||||
Deposits at interest with banks(4) | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (225 | ) | $ | (232 | ) | |
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 295 | $ | (437 | ) | $ | (142 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 211 | (215 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 506 | $ | (652 | ) | $ | (146 | ) | ||
Trading account assets(5) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (247 | ) | $ | (1,434 | ) | $ | (1,681 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 559 | (867 | ) | (308 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 312 | $ | (2,301 | ) | $ | (1,989 | ) | ||
Investments(1) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 704 | $ | (1,163 | ) | $ | (459 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 695 | (752 | ) | (57 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 1,399 | $ | (1,915 | ) | $ | (516 | ) | ||
Loans (net of unearned income)(6) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 2,743 | $ | 2,836 | $ | 5,579 | ||||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (735 | ) | (727 | ) | (1,462 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | 2,008 | $ | 2,109 | $ | 4,117 | ||||
Other interest-earning assets | $ | (48 | ) | $ | (169 | ) | $ | (217 | ) | |
Total interest revenue | $ | 4,170 | $ | (3,153 | ) | $ | 1,017 | |||
Deposits | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 48 | $ | (1,212 | ) | $ | (1,164 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 438 | (846 | ) | (408 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 486 | $ | (2,058 | ) | $ | (1,572 | ) | ||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (55 | ) | $ | (133 | ) | $ | (188 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 317 | (712 | ) | (395 | ) | |||||
Total | $ | 262 | $ | (845 | ) | $ | (583 | ) | ||
Trading account liabilities(5) | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 79 | $ | (90 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | ||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | 10 | (7 | ) | 3 | ||||||
Total | $ | 89 | $ | (97 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | ||
Short-term borrowings | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | (19 | ) | $ | (172 | ) | $ | (191 | ) | |
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (24 | ) | (72 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | (43 | ) | $ | (244 | ) | $ | (287 | ) | |
Long-term debt | ||||||||||
In U.S. offices | $ | 1,447 | $ | (678 | ) | $ | 769 | |||
In offices outside the U.S.(4) | (123 | ) | (24 | ) | (147 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | 1,324 | $ | (702 | ) | $ | 622 | |||
Total interest expense | $ | 2,118 | $ | (3,946 | ) | $ | (1,828 | ) | ||
Net interest revenue | $ | 2,052 | $ | 793 | $ | 2,845 | ||||
The table below shows all countries where total Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) cross-border outstandings exceed 0.75% of total Citigroup assets:
| Cross-Border Claims on Third Parties | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of U.S. dollars | Banks | Public | Private | Total | Trading and Short-Term Claims | Investments in and Funding of Local Franchises | Total Cross-Border Outstandings | Commitments | Total Cross-Border Outstandings | Commitments | |||||||||||||||||||||
France | $ | 10.8 | $ | 11.3 | $ | 12.1 | $ | 34.2 | $ | 26.0 | $ | 2.6 | $ | 36.8 | $ | 62.4 | $ | 33.0 | $ | 68.5 | |||||||||||
Germany | 13.7 | 6.5 | 6.1 | 26.3 | 21.9 | 6.8 | 33.1 | 62.8 | 30.2 | 53.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
India | 1.8 | 0.4 | 6.2 | 8.4 | 6.0 | 17.1 | 25.5 | 1.9 | 24.9 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cayman Islands | 0.3 | 0.7 | 20.6 | 21.6 | 20.9 | — | 21.6 | 4.7 | 18.0 | 6.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
United Kingdom | 10.9 | 1.0 | 8.0 | 19.9 | 17.8 | — | 19.9 | 142.5 | 17.1 | 138.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
South Korea | 1.7 | 0.4 | 2.9 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 11.4 | 16.4 | 15.1 | 17.4 | 14.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mexico | 2.0 | 1.2 | 3.7 | 6.9 | 4.4 | 8.4 | 15.3 | 21.7 | 12.8 | 21.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Netherlands | 4.6 | 2.7 | 8.0 | 15.3 | 9.7 | — | 15.3 | 45.2 | 20.3 | 65.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Italy | 1.1 | 9.4 | 2.4 | 12.9 | 11.2 | 0.9 | 13.8 | 16.4 | 21.7 | 21.2 |
Venezuelan Operations
In 2003, the Venezuelan government enacted currency restrictions that have restricted Citigroup's ability to obtain U.S. dollars in Venezuela at the official foreign currency rate. In May 2010, the government enacted new laws that have closed the parallel foreign exchange market and established a new foreign exchange market. Citigroup does not have access to U.S. dollars in this new market. Citigroup uses the official rate to re-measure the foreign currency transactions in the financial statements of its Venezuelan operations, which have U.S. dollar functional currencies, into U.S. dollars. At June 30, 2010, Citigroup had net monetary assets in its Venezuelan operations denominated in bolivars of approximately $200 million.
See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion and disclosures related to Citigroup's derivative activities. The following discussions relate to the Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives and Credit Derivatives activities.
Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives
The table below summarizes the CVA applied to the fair value of derivative instruments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
| Credit valuation adjustment Contra-liability (contra-asset) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
Non-monoline counterparties | $ | (3,618 | ) | $ | (3010 | ) | |
Citigroup (own) | 1,567 | 1,401 | |||||
Net non-monoline CVA | $ | (2,051 | ) | $ | (1,609 | ) | |
Monoline counterparties(1) | (1,637 | ) | (5,580 | ) | |||
Total CVA—derivative instruments | $ | (3,688 | ) | $ | (7,189 | ) |
The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses) related to changes in credit valuation adjustments on derivative instruments, net of hedges:
| Credit valuation adjustment gain (loss) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Second Quarter 2010 | Second Quarter 2009(1) | Six months ended June 30, 2010 | Six months ended June 30, 2009(1) | |||||||||
CVA on derivatives, excluding monolines | $ | (247 | ) | $ | 734 | $ | 67 | $ | 3,215 | ||||
CVA related to monoline counterparties | 35 | 157 | 433 | (933 | ) | ||||||||
Total CVA—derivative instruments | $ | (212 | ) | $ | 891 | $ | 500 | $ | 2,282 | ||||
The CVA amounts shown above relate solely to the derivative portfolio, and do not include:
Credit Derivatives
Citigroup makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives, both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account. Through these contracts Citigroup either purchases or writes protection on either a single-name or portfolio basis. Citi primarily uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate loan portfolio and other cash positions, and to facilitate client transactions.
Credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of predefined events (settlement triggers). These settlement triggers, which are defined by the form of the derivative and the referenced credit, are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy (or comparable events) of the reference credit and, in a more limited range of transactions, debt restructuring.
Credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium. In certain transactions on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities, the seller of protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount.
The following tables summarize the key characteristics of Citi's credit derivatives portfolio by counterparty and derivative form as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
June 30, 2010:
| Fair values | Notionals | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Receivable | Payable | Beneficiary | Guarantor | |||||||||
By industry/counterparty | |||||||||||||
Bank | $ | 50,506 | $ | 47,514 | $ | 830,163 | $ | 772,889 | |||||
Broker-dealer | 20,231 | 20,702 | 312,437 | 298,884 | |||||||||
Monoline | 2,047 | — | 4,395 | — | |||||||||
Non-financial | 300 | 120 | 1,448 | 368 | |||||||||
Insurance and other financial institutions | 12,370 | 9,331 | 142,036 | 109,183 | |||||||||
Total by industry/counterparty | $ | 85,454 | $ | 77,667 | $ | 1,290,479 | $ | 1,181,324 | |||||
By instrument | |||||||||||||
Credit default swaps and options | $ | 84,597 | $ | 76,620 | $ | 1,267,276 | $ | 1,180,087 | |||||
Total return swaps and other | 857 | 1,047 | 23,203 | 1,237 | |||||||||
Total by instrument | $ | 85,454 | $ | 77,667 | $ | 1,290,479 | $ | 1,181,324 | |||||
By rating: | |||||||||||||
Investment grade | $ | 25,005 | $ | 19,772 | $ | 595,049 | $ | 526,043 | |||||
Non-investment grade(1) | 60,449 | 57,895 | 695,430 | 655,281 | |||||||||
Total by Rating | $ | 85,454 | $ | 77,667 | $ | 1,290,479 | $ | 1,181,324 | |||||
By maturity: | |||||||||||||
Within 1 year | $ | 2,169 | $ | 1,995 | $ | 142,787 | $ | 137,914 | |||||
From 1 to 5 years | 51,222 | 44,993 | 917,276 | 832,146 | |||||||||
After 5 years | 32,063 | 30,679 | 230,416 | 211,264 | |||||||||
Total by maturity | $ | 85,454 | $ | 77,667 | $ | 1,290,479 | $ | 1,181,324 | |||||
December 31, 2009:
| Fair values | Notionals | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Receivable | Payable | Beneficiary | Guarantor | |||||||||
By industry/counterparty | |||||||||||||
Bank | $ | 52,383 | $ | 50,778 | $ | 872,523 | $ | 807,484 | |||||
Broker-dealer | 23,241 | 22,932 | 338,829 | 340,949 | |||||||||
Monoline | 5,860 | — | 10,018 | 33 | |||||||||
Non-financial | 339 | 371 | 1,781 | 623 | |||||||||
Insurance and other financial institutions | 10,969 | 8,343 | 109,811 | 64,964 | |||||||||
Total by industry/counterparty | $ | 92,792 | $ | 82,424 | $ | 1,332,962 | $ | 1,214,053 | |||||
By instrument | |||||||||||||
Credit default swaps and options | $ | 91,625 | $ | 81,174 | $ | 1,305,724 | $ | 1,213,208 | |||||
Total return swaps and other | 1,167 | 1,250 | 27,238 | 845 | |||||||||
Total by instrument | $ | 92,792 | $ | 82,424 | $ | 1,332,962 | $ | 1,214,053 | |||||
By rating: | |||||||||||||
Investment grade | $ | 26,666 | $ | 22,469 | $ | 656,876 | $ | 576,930 | |||||
Non-investment grade(1) | 66,126 | 59,995 | 676,086 | 637,123 | |||||||||
Total by Rating | $ | 92,792 | $ | 82,424 | $ | 1,332,962 | $ | 1,214,053 | |||||
By maturity: | |||||||||||||
Within 1 year | $ | 2,167 | $ | 2,067 | $ | 173,880 | $ | 165,056 | |||||
From 1 to 5 years | 54,079 | 47,350 | 877,573 | 806,143 | |||||||||
After 5 years | 36,546 | 33,007 | 281,509 | 242,854 | |||||||||
Total by maturity | $ | 92,792 | $ | 82,424 | $ | 1,332,962 | $ | 1,214,053 | |||||
The fair values shown are prior to the application of any netting agreements, cash collateral, and market or credit value adjustments.
Citigroup actively participates in trading a variety of credit derivatives products as both an active two-way market-maker for clients and to manage credit risk. The majority of this activity was transacted with other financial intermediaries, including both banks and broker-dealers. Citigroup generally has a mismatch between the total notional amounts of protection purchased and sold and it may hold the reference assets directly, rather than entering into offsetting credit derivative contracts as and when desired. The open risk exposures from credit derivative contracts are largely matched after certain cash positions in reference assets are considered and after notional amounts are adjusted, either to a duration-based equivalent basis or to reflect the level of subordination in tranched structures.
Citi actively monitors its counterparty credit risk in credit derivative contracts. Approximately 91% and 85% of the gross receivables are from counterparties with which Citi maintains collateral agreements as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. A majority of Citi's top 15 counterparties (by receivable balance owed to the company) are banks, financial institutions or other dealers. Contracts with these counterparties do not include ratings-based termination events. However, counterparty ratings downgrades may have an incremental effect by lowering the threshold at which Citigroup may call for additional collateral. A number of the remaining significant counterparties are monolines (which have CVA as shown above).
Deferred Tax Assets (DTA)
Deferred taxes are recorded for the future consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, based upon enacted tax laws and rates. DTAs are recognized subject to management's judgment that realization is more likely than not.
As of June 30, 2010, Citigroup had recognized net DTAs of approximately $49.9 billion, a decrease of $0.3 billion from $50.2 billion at March 31, 2010.
Although realization is not assured, Citi believes that the realization of the recognized net deferred tax asset of $49.9 billion at June 30, 2010 is more likely than not based on expectations as to future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which the DTAs arise and, based on available tax planning strategies as defined in ASC 740,Income Taxes, that could be implemented if necessary to prevent a carryforward from expiring.
Approximately $19 billion of Citigroup's DTAs is represented by U.S. federal, foreign, state and local tax return carry-forwards subject to expiration substantially beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2029. Included in Citi's overall net DTAs of $49.9 billion is $31 billion of future tax deductions and credits that arose largely due to timing differences between the recognition of income for GAAP and tax purposes and represent net deductions and credits that have not yet been taken on a tax return. The most significant source of these timing differences is the loan loss reserve build, which accounts for approximately $19 billion of the net DTAs. In general, Citi would need to recognize approximately $99 billion of taxable income, primarily in U.S. taxable jurisdictions, during the respective carryforward periods to fully realize its U.S. federal, state and local DTAs.
Citi's ability to utilize its DTAs to offset future taxable income may be significantly limited if Citi experiences an "ownership change," as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). In general, an ownership change will occur if there is a cumulative change in Citi's ownership by "5% shareholders" (as defined in the Code) that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. A corporation that experiences an ownership change will generally be subject to an annual limitation on its pre-ownership change DTAs equal to the value of the corporation immediately before the ownership change, multiplied by the long-term tax-exempt rate (subject to certain adjustments); provided that the annual limitation would be increased each year to the extent that there is an unused limitation in a prior year. The limitation arising from an ownership change under Section 382 on Citigroup's ability to utilize its DTAs will depend on the value of Citigroup's stock at the time of the ownership change.
Under IRS Notice 2010-2, Citigroup will not experience an ownership change within the meaning of Section 382 as a result of the sales of its common stock held by the U.S. Treasury.
Approximately $15 billion of the net deferred tax asset is included in Tier 1 and Tier 1 Common regulatory capital.
Included in the tax provision for the second quarter of 2010 was a release of $72 million in respect of the conclusion of the IRS audit of Citigroup's U.S. Federal consolidated income tax returns for the years 2003-2005.
RECLASSIFICATION OF HELD-TO-MATURITY (HTM) SECURITIES TO AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE (AFS)
In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11,Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives. The ASU clarifies that certain embedded derivatives, such as those contained in certain securitizations, CDOs and structured notes, should be considered embedded credit derivatives subject to potential bifurcation and separate fair value accounting. The ASU allows any beneficial interest issued by a securitization vehicle to be accounted for under the fair value option at transition on July 1, 2010.
The Company elected to account for beneficial interests issued by securitization vehicles, with a total fair value of $11.8 billion, under the fair value option on July 1, 2010. Beneficial interests previously classified as held-to-maturity (HTM) were reclassified to available-for-sale (AFS) on June 30, 2010, because as of that reporting date, the Company did not have the intent to hold the beneficial interests until maturity.
All reclassified debt securities with gross unrealized losses were assessed for other-than-temporary impairment as of June 30, 2010, including an assessment of whether the Company intends to sell the security. For securities that the Company intends to sell, impairment charges of $176 million (pretax) were recorded in earnings in the second quarter of 2010.
On July 1, 2010, the Company recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings for reclassified beneficial interests, consisting of gross unrealized losses recognized inAccumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) of $401 million and gross unrealized gains recognized in AOCI of $355 million, for a net charge toRetained earnings of $46 million.
See Notes 1and 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for details of this reclassification.
See Citi's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q , for a discussion of contractual obligations.
Disclosure
Citigroup's disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, including without limitation that information required to be disclosed by Citi in its SEC filings is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Citigroup's Disclosure Committee assists the CEO and CFO in their responsibilities to design, establish, maintain and evaluate the effectiveness of Citi's disclosure controls and procedures. The Company'sDisclosure Committee is responsible for, among other things, the oversight, maintenance and implementation of the disclosure controls and procedures, subject to the supervision and oversight of the CEO and CFO.
Citigroup's management, with the participation of the Company'scompany's CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company'sCitigroup's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of June 30, 20092010 and, based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that at that date the Company'sCitigroup's disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company'sCitigroup's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 20092010 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company'sCiti's internal control over financial reporting.
When describing future business conditions Certain statements in this Form 10-Q, including but not limited to descriptions instatements included within the section titled "Management'sManagement's Discussion and Analysis" the Company makes certain of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are forward-looking statements that are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The Company's actual results may differ materially from those included in theGenerally, forward-looking statements which are indicatednot based on historical facts but instead represent only Citigroup's and management's beliefs regarding future events. Such statements may be identified by words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "maybelieve, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, may increase," "may may fluctuate", and similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as "will," "should," "would,"will, should, would and "could."could.
These forward-lookingSuch statements are based on management's current expectations and involve external risksare subject to uncertainty and uncertaintieschanges in circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors, including but not limited to thosethe factors listed and described under "Risk Factors" in Citigroup's 2008Citi's 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Other risks10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009 and uncertainties disclosed herein include, but are not limited to:those factors described below:
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| |||
Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited)—For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheet—June 30, | |||
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited)—Six Months Ended June 30, | |||
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)—Six Months Ended June 30, | |||
Citibank Consolidated Balance Sheet—Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries—June 30, | |||
| |||
Note 1—Basis of Presentation | |||
Note 2—Discontinued Operations | |||
Note 3—Business Segments | |||
Note 4—Interest Revenue and Expense | |||
Note 5—Commissions and Fees | |||
Note 6— | |||
Note 7— | |||
Note 8—Earnings | |||
Note 9—Trading Account Assets and Liabilities | |||
Note 10—Investments | |||
Note 11—Goodwill and Intangible Assets | |||
Note 12—Debt | |||
Note 13— | |||
| |||
Note | |||
Note 15—Derivatives Activities | 151 | ||
Note 16— | |||
Note 17— | |||
Note 18— | |||
Note 19— | |||
Note 20— | |||
Note 21— | |||
Note 22— | |||
Note 23— | |||
|
This page intentionally left blank.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (Unaudited)
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
| Three months ended June 30 | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except per share amounts | 2009 | 2008(1) | 2009 | 2008(1) | ||||||||||
Revenues | ||||||||||||||
Interest revenue | $ | 19,671 | $ | 27,337 | $ | 40,254 | $ | 56,498 | ||||||
Interest expense | 6,842 | 13,351 | 14,499 | 29,424 | ||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 12,829 | $ | 13,986 | $ | 25,755 | $ | 27,074 | ||||||
Commissions and fees | $ | 5,437 | $ | 5,799 | $ | 9,605 | $ | 7,140 | ||||||
Principal transactions | 433 | (5,802 | ) | 4,103 | (12,434 | ) | ||||||||
Administration and other fiduciary fees | 1,472 | 2,197 | 3,078 | 4,398 | ||||||||||
Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments | 535 | 29 | 1,292 | 226 | ||||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments(2) | ||||||||||||||
Gross impairment losses | (2,329 | ) | (168 | ) | (3,708 | ) | (484 | ) | ||||||
Less: Impairments recognized in OCI | 1,634 | — | 2,265 | — | ||||||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings | $ | (695 | ) | $ | (168 | ) | $ | (1,443 | ) | $ | (484 | ) | ||
Insurance premiums | 745 | 847 | 1,500 | 1,690 | ||||||||||
Other revenue | 9,213 | 650 | 10,600 | 2,085 | ||||||||||
Total non-interest revenues | $ | 17,140 | $ | 3,552 | $ | 28,735 | $ | 2,621 | ||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 29,969 | $ | 17,538 | $ | 54,490 | $ | 29,695 | ||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | ||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | $ | 12,233 | $ | 6,983 | $ | 22,148 | $ | 12,560 | ||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims | 308 | 260 | 640 | 535 | ||||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments | 135 | (143 | ) | 195 | (143 | ) | ||||||||
Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 12,676 | $ | 7,100 | $ | 22,983 | $ | 12,952 | ||||||
Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | $ | 6,359 | $ | 8,692 | $ | 12,594 | $ | 17,254 | ||||||
Premises and equipment | 1,091 | 1,347 | 2,174 | 2,641 | ||||||||||
Technology/communication | 1,154 | 1,519 | 2,296 | 3,019 | ||||||||||
Advertising and marketing | 351 | 616 | 685 | 1,217 | ||||||||||
Restructuring | (32 | ) | (44 | ) | (45 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||
Other operating | 3,076 | 3,084 | 5,980 | 6,489 | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 11,999 | $ | 15,214 | $ | 23,684 | $ | 30,591 | ||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | $ | 5,294 | $ | (4,776 | ) | $ | 7,823 | $ | (13,848 | ) | ||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | 907 | (2,447 | ) | 1,742 | (6,333 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 4,387 | $ | (2,329 | ) | $ | 6,081 | $ | (7,515 | ) | ||||
Discontinued operations | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | (279 | ) | $ | 337 | $ | (431 | ) | $ | 391 | ||||
Gain (loss) on sale | 14 | (517 | ) | 2 | (517 | ) | ||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | (123 | ) | (86 | ) | (170 | ) | (91 | ) | ||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | $ | (142 | ) | $ | (94 | ) | $ | (259 | ) | $ | (35 | ) | ||
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests | $ | 4,245 | $ | (2,423 | ) | $ | 5,822 | $ | (7,550 | ) | ||||
Net Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | (34 | ) | 72 | (50 | ) | 56 | ||||||||
Citigroup's net income (loss) | $ | 4,279 | $ | (2,495 | ) | $ | 5,872 | $ | (7,606 | ) | ||||
Basic earnings per share(3) | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 0.51 | $ | (0.53 | ) | $ | 0.36 | $ | (1.56 | ) | ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | (0.02 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.01 | ) | ||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 0.49 | $ | (0.55 | ) | $ | 0.31 | $ | (1.57 | ) | ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 5,399.5 | 5,287.4 | 5,392.3 | 5,186.5 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share(3) | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 0.51 | $ | (0.53 | ) | $ | 0.36 | $ | (1.56 | ) | ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | (0.02 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.01 | ) | ||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 0.49 | $ | (0.55 | ) | $ | 0.31 | $ | (1.57 | ) | ||||
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding | 5,967.8 | 5,776.8 | 5,960.6 | 5,676.3 | ||||||||||
| Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except per-share amounts | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Revenues | ||||||||||||||
Interest revenue | $ | 20,418 | $ | 19,671 | $ | 41,270 | $ | 40,254 | ||||||
Interest expense | 6,379 | 6,842 | 12,670 | 14,499 | ||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 14,039 | $ | 12,829 | $ | 28,600 | $ | 25,755 | ||||||
Commissions and fees | $ | 3,229 | $ | 4,084 | $ | 6,874 | $ | 8,068 | ||||||
Principal transactions | 2,217 | 1,788 | 6,370 | 5,701 | ||||||||||
Administration and other fiduciary fees | 910 | 1,472 | 1,932 | 3,078 | ||||||||||
Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments | 523 | 535 | 1,061 | 1,292 | ||||||||||
Other than temporary impairment losses on investments | ||||||||||||||
Gross impairment losses | (457 | ) | (2,329 | ) | (1,007 | ) | (3,708 | ) | ||||||
Less: Impairments recognized in Other comprehensive income (OCI) | 3 | 1,634 | 46 | 2,265 | ||||||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings | $ | (454 | ) | $ | (695 | ) | $ | (961 | ) | $ | (1,443 | ) | ||
Insurance premiums | $ | 636 | $ | 745 | $ | 1,384 | $ | 1,500 | ||||||
Other revenue | 971 | 9,211 | 2,232 | 10,539 | ||||||||||
Total non-interest revenues | $ | 8,032 | $ | 17,140 | $ | 18,892 | $ | 28,735 | ||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 22,071 | $ | 29,969 | $ | 47,492 | $ | 54,490 | ||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | ||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses | $ | 6,523 | $ | 12,233 | $ | 14,889 | $ | 22,148 | ||||||
Policyholder benefits and claims | 213 | 308 | 500 | 640 | ||||||||||
Provision for unfunded lending commitments | (71 | ) | 135 | (106 | ) | 195 | ||||||||
Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | 6,665 | $ | 12,676 | $ | 15,283 | $ | 22,983 | ||||||
Operating expenses | ||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | $ | 5,961 | $ | 6,359 | $ | 12,123 | $ | 12,594 | ||||||
Premises and equipment | 936 | 1,091 | 1,901 | 2,174 | ||||||||||
Technology/communication | 1,083 | 1,154 | 2,147 | 2,296 | ||||||||||
Advertising and marketing | 367 | 351 | 669 | 685 | ||||||||||
Restructuring | — | (32 | ) | (3 | ) | (45 | ) | |||||||
Other operating | 3,519 | 3,076 | 6,547 | 5,980 | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 11,866 | $ | 11,999 | $ | 23,384 | $ | 23,684 | ||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes | $ | 3,540 | $ | 5,294 | $ | 8,825 | $ | 7,823 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes | 812 | 907 | 1,848 | 1,742 | ||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 2,728 | $ | 4,387 | $ | 6,977 | 6,081 | |||||||
Discontinued operations | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (279 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (431 | ) | ||
Gain on sale | — | 14 | 94 | 2 | ||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes | — | (123 | ) | (122 | ) | (170 | ) | |||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (142 | ) | $ | 208 | $ | (259 | ) | |||
Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests | $ | 2,725 | $ | 4,245 | $ | 7,185 | $ | 5,822 | ||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests | 28 | (34 | ) | 60 | (50 | ) | ||||||||
Citigroup's net income | $ | 2,697 | $ | 4,279 | $ | 7,125 | $ | 5,872 | ||||||
Basic earnings per share | ||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | — | (0.02 | ) | 0.01 | (0.05 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.31 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding | 28,849.4 | 5,399.5 | 28,646.9 | 5,392.3 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share | ||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | — | (0.02 | ) | 0.01 | (0.05 | ) | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.31 | ||||||
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding | 29,752.6 | 5,967.8 | 29,543.1 | 5,960.6 | ||||||||||
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
In millions of dollars, except shares | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Unaudited) | | ||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits) | $ | 26,915 | $ | 29,253 | ||||
Deposits with banks | 182,577 | 170,331 | ||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (including $73,755 and $70,305 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) | 179,503 | 184,133 | ||||||
Brokerage receivables | 34,598 | 44,278 | ||||||
Trading account assets (including $125,977 and $148,703 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) | 325,037 | 377,635 | ||||||
Investments (including $32,159 and $14,875 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) | 266,757 | 256,020 | ||||||
Loans, net of unearned income | ||||||||
Consumer (including $32 and $36 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) | 447,652 | 481,387 | ||||||
Corporate (including $1,799 and $2,696 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) | 194,038 | 212,829 | ||||||
Loans, net of unearned income | $ | 641,690 | $ | 694,216 | ||||
Allowance for loan losses | (35,940 | ) | (29,616 | ) | ||||
Total loans, net | $ | 605,750 | $ | 664,600 | ||||
Goodwill | 25,578 | 27,132 | ||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs) | 10,098 | 14,159 | ||||||
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) | 6,770 | 5,657 | ||||||
Other assets (including $19,300 and $21,372 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 respectively, at fair value) | 165,538 | 165,272 | ||||||
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale | 19,412 | — | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,848,533 | $ | 1,938,470 | ||||
Liabilities | ||||||||
Deposits | ||||||||
Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices | $ | 82,854 | $ | 60,070 | ||||
Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices (including $998 and $1,335 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) | 228,576 | 229,906 | ||||||
Total U.S. deposits | $ | 311,430 | $ | 289,976 | ||||
Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. | 40,389 | 37,412 | ||||||
Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. (including $1,109 and $1,271 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) | 452,917 | 446,797 | ||||||
Total international deposits | $ | 493,306 | $ | 484,209 | ||||
Total deposits | $ | 804,736 | $ | 774,185 | ||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (including $116,133 and $138,866 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) | 172,016 | 205,293 | ||||||
Brokerage payables | 52,696 | 70,916 | ||||||
Trading account liabilities | 119,312 | 167,478 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings (including $3,358 and $17,607 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) | 101,894 | 126,691 | ||||||
Long-term debt (including $24,690 and $27,263 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) | 348,046 | 359,593 | ||||||
Other liabilities (including $12,667 and $11,889 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value) | 83,291 | 90,292 | ||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale | 12,374 | — | ||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 1,694,365 | $ | 1,794,448 | ||||
Citigroup stockholders' equity | ||||||||
Preferred stock ($1.00 par value; authorized shares: 30 million), issued shares:835,632 at June 30, 2009, at aggregate liquidation value | $ | 74,301 | $ | 70,664 | ||||
Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized shares: 15 billion), issued shares:5,671,743,807 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. | 57 | 57 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 16,663 | 19,165 | ||||||
Retained earnings | 88,874 | 86,521 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost:June 30, 2009—164,026,833 shares and December 31, 2008—221,675,719 shares | (5,950 | ) | (9,582 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (21,643 | ) | (25,195 | ) | ||||
Total Citigroup stockholders' equity | $ | 152,302 | $ | 141,630 | ||||
Noncontrolling interest | 1,866 | 2,392 | ||||||
Total equity | $ | 154,168 | $ | 144,022 | ||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 1,848,533 | $ | 1,938,470 | ||||
In millions of dollars, except shares | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Unaudited) | | ||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits) | $ | 24,709 | $ | 25,472 | ||||
Deposits with banks | 160,780 | 167,414 | ||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (including $98,099 and $87,837 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value) | 230,784 | 222,022 | ||||||
Brokerage receivables | 36,872 | 33,634 | ||||||
Trading account assets (including $119,567 and $111,219 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) | 309,412 | 342,773 | ||||||
Investments (including $16,895 and $15,154 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively and $277,611and $246,429 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value) | 317,066 | 306,119 | ||||||
Loans, net of unearned income | ||||||||
Consumer (including $2,620 and $34 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value) | 505,446 | 424,057 | ||||||
Corporate (including $2,358 and $1,405 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value) | 186,720 | 167,447 | ||||||
Loans, net of unearned income | $ | 692,166 | $ | 591,504 | ||||
Allowance for loan losses | (46,197 | ) | (36,033 | ) | ||||
Total loans, net | $ | 645,969 | $ | 555,471 | ||||
Goodwill | 25,201 | 25,392 | ||||||
Intangible assets (other than MSRs) | 7,868 | 8,714 | ||||||
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) | 4,894 | 6,530 | ||||||
Other assets (including $18,716 and $12,664 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value) | 174,101 | 163,105 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,937,656 | $ | 1,856,646 | ||||
See Notes to The following table presents certain assets of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs), which are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements.Balance Sheet above. The assets in the table below include only those assets that can be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs on the following page, and are in excess of those obligations.
| June 30, 2010 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets of consolidated VIEs that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs | |||||
Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits) | $ | 2,721 | |||
Trading account assets | 4,187 | ||||
Investments | 11,247 | ||||
Loans, net of unearned income | |||||
Consumer (including $2,590 at fair value) | 150,770 | ||||
Corporate (including $680 at fair value) | 22,388 | ||||
Loans, net of unearned income | $ | 173,158 | |||
Allowance for loan losses | (13,916 | ) | |||
Total loans, net | $ | 159,242 | |||
Other assets | 4,944 | ||||
Total assets of consolidated VIEs that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs | $ | 182,341 | |||
CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Continued)
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
In millions of dollars, except shares | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Unaudited) | | |||||
Liabilities | |||||||
Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices | $ | 59,225 | $ | 71,325 | |||
Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices (including $642 and $700 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value) | 241,820 | 232,093 | |||||
Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. | 46,322 | 44,904 | |||||
Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. (including $745 and $845 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value) | 466,584 | 487,581 | |||||
Total deposits | $ | 813,951 | $ | 835,903 | |||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (including $119,282 and $104,030 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value) | 196,112 | 154,281 | |||||
Brokerage payables | 54,774 | 60,846 | |||||
Trading account liabilities | 131,001 | 137,512 | |||||
Short-term borrowings (including $1,650 and $639 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value) | 92,752 | 68,879 | |||||
Long-term debt (including $25,858 and $25,942 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value) | 413,297 | 364,019 | |||||
Other liabilities (including $11,205 and $11,542 as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value) | 78,439 | 80,233 | |||||
Total liabilities | $ | 1,780,326 | $ | 1,701,673 | |||
Stockholders' equity | |||||||
Preferred stock ($1.00 par value; authorized shares: 30 million), issued shares:12,038 at June 30, 2010, at aggregate liquidation value | $ | 312 | $ | 312 | |||
Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized shares: 60 billion), issued shares:29,164,931,175 at June 30, 2010 and 28,626,100,389 at December 31, 2009 | 292 | 286 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 99,014 | 98,142 | |||||
Retained earnings | 76,130 | 77,440 | |||||
Treasury stock, at cost:June 30, 2010—189,512,054 shares and December 31, 2009—142,833,099 shares | (1,772 | ) | (4,543 | ) | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (19,170 | ) | (18,937 | ) | |||
Total Citigroup stockholders' equity | $ | 154,806 | $ | 152,700 | |||
Noncontrolling interest | 2,524 | 2,273 | |||||
Total equity | $ | 157,330 | $ | 154,973 | |||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 1,937,656 | $ | 1,856,646 | |||
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table presents certain liabilities of consolidated VIEs, which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The liabilities in the table below include third-party liabilities of consolidated VIEs only, and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. The liabilities also exclude amounts where creditors or beneficial interest holders have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup.
| June 30, 2010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup: | ||||
Short-term borrowings | $ | 32,665 | ||
Long-term debt (including $5,418 at fair value) | 101,004 | |||
Other liabilities | 4,589 | |||
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup | $ | 138,258 | ||
CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
| Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Preferred stock at aggregate liquidation value | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 70,664 | $ | — | ||||
Issuance of preferred stock | 3,637 | 27,424 | ||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 74,301 | $ | 27,424 | ||||
Common stock and additional paid-in capital | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 19,222 | $ | 18,062 | ||||
Employee benefit plans | (3,892 | ) | (2,695 | ) | ||||
Issuance of Common stock | — | 4,911 | ||||||
Issuance of shares for Nikko Cordial acquisition | — | (3,500 | ) | |||||
Issuance of TARP-related warrants | 88 | — | ||||||
Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price | 1,285 | — | ||||||
Other | 17 | (127 | ) | |||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 16,720 | $ | 16,651 | ||||
Retained earnings | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 86,521 | $ | 121,769 | ||||
Adjustment to opening balance, net of tax(1) | 413 | — | ||||||
Adjusted balance, beginning of period | $ | 86,934 | $ | 121,769 | ||||
Net income (loss) | 5,872 | (7,606 | ) | |||||
Common dividends(2) | (37 | ) | (3,429 | ) | ||||
Preferred dividends | (2,502 | ) | (444 | ) | ||||
Preferred stock Series H discount accretion | (108 | ) | — | |||||
Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price | (1,285 | ) | — | |||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 88,874 | $ | 110,290 | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | (9,582 | ) | $ | (21,724 | ) | ||
Issuance of shares pursuant to employee benefit plans | 3,617 | 3,941 | ||||||
Treasury stock acquired(3) | (2 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Issuance of shares for Nikko Cordial acquisition | — | 7,858 | ||||||
Other | 17 | 20 | ||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | (5,950 | ) | $ | (9,911 | ) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | (25,195 | ) | $ | (4,660 | ) | ||
Adjustment to opening balance, net of tax(1) | (413 | ) | — | |||||
Adjusted balance, beginning of period | $ | (25,608 | ) | $ | (4,660 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of tax | 3,005 | (3,715 | ) | |||||
Net change in cash flow hedges, net of tax | 1,524 | (760 | ) | |||||
Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax | (568 | ) | 1,111 | |||||
Pension liability adjustment, net of tax | 4 | (25 | ) | |||||
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 3,965 | $ | (3,389 | ) | |||
Balance, end of period | $ | (21,643 | ) | $ | (8,049 | ) | ||
Total Citigroup common stockholders' equity (shares outstanding: 5,507,717 at June 30, 2009 and 5,450,068 at December 31, 2008) | $ | 78,001 | $ | 108,981 | ||||
Total Citigroup stockholders' equity | $ | 152,302 | $ | 136,405 | ||||
Noncontrolling interests | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 2,392 | $ | 5,308 | ||||
Initial origination of a noncontrolling interests | — | 1,409 | ||||||
Transactions between noncontrolling interest shareholders and the related consolidating subsidiary | (134 | ) | (2,237 | ) | ||||
Transactions between Citigroup and the noncontrolling interest shareholders | (359 | ) | (261 | ) | ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest shareholders | (50 | ) | 56 | |||||
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest shareholders | (16 | ) | (61 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investments securities, net of tax | 1 | (12 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax | (31 | ) | 126 | |||||
All other | 63 | 187 | ||||||
Net change in noncontrolling interests | $ | (526 | ) | $ | (793 | ) | ||
Balance, end of period | $ | 1,866 | $ | 4,515 | ||||
Total equity | $ | 154,168 | $ | 140,920 | ||||
| Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Preferred stock at aggregate liquidation value | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 312 | $ | 70,664 | |||
Issuance of new preferred stock | — | 3,637 | |||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 312 | $ | 74,301 | |||
Common stock and additional paid-in capital | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 98,428 | $ | 19,222 | |||
Employee benefit plans(1) | (913 | ) | (3,892 | ) | |||
Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price | — | 1,285 | |||||
Issuance of TARP-related warrants | — | 88 | |||||
ADIA Upper Decs Equity Units Purchase Contract | 1,875 | — | |||||
Other | (84 | ) | 17 | ||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 99,306 | $ | 16,720 | |||
Retained earnings | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 77,440 | $ | 86,521 | |||
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(2)(3) | (8,442 | ) | 413 | ||||
Adjusted balance, beginning of period | $ | 68,998 | $ | 86,934 | |||
Citigroup's net income | 7,125 | 5,872 | |||||
Common dividends(4) | 7 | (37 | ) | ||||
Preferred dividends | — | (2,502 | ) | ||||
Preferred stock Series H discount accretion | — | (108 | ) | ||||
Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price | — | (1,285 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 76,130 | $ | 88,874 | |||
Treasury stock, at cost | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | (4,543 | ) | $ | (9,582 | ) | |
Issuance of shares pursuant to employee benefit plans | 2,774 | 3,617 | |||||
Treasury stock acquired(5) | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | |||
Other | 2 | 17 | |||||
Balance, end of period | $ | (1,772 | ) | $ | (5,950 | ) | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | (18,937 | ) | $ | (25,195 | ) | |
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(2) | — | (413 | ) | ||||
Adjusted balance, beginning of period | $ | (18,937 | ) | $ | (25,608 | ) | |
Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of taxes | 2,088 | 3,005 | |||||
Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes | (2 | ) | 1,524 | ||||
Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes | (2,315 | ) | (568 | ) | |||
Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes | (4 | ) | 4 | ||||
Net change inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (233 | ) | $ | 3,965 | ||
Balance, end of period | $ | (19,170 | ) | $ | (21,643 | ) | |
Total Citigroup common stockholders' equity (shares outstanding: 28,975,419 at June 30, 2010 and 28,483,267 at December 31, 2009) | $ | 154,494 | $ | 78,001 | |||
Total Citigroup stockholders' equity | $ | 154,806 | $ | 152,302 | |||
[Statement continues on the following page, including notes to table]
Table of ContentsCITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)
(Continued)
Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries
Comprehensive income (loss) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests | $ | 5,822 | $ | (7,550 | ) | |||
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 3,935 | (3,275 | ) | |||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 9,757 | $ | (10,825 | ) | |||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest | (80 | ) | 170 | |||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Citigroup | $ | 9,837 | $ | (10,995 | ) | |||
| Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 2,273 | $ | 2,392 | ||||
Origination of a noncontrolling interest | 286 | — | ||||||
Transactions between noncontrolling interest shareholders and the related consolidating subsidiary | (26 | ) | (134 | ) | ||||
Transactions between Citigroup and the noncontrolling-interest shareholders | — | (359 | ) | |||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling-interest shareholders | 60 | (50 | ) | |||||
Dividends paid to noncontrolling—interest shareholders | (54 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income—net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of tax | 6 | 1 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income—net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax | (105 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||
All other | 84 | 63 | ||||||
Net change in noncontrolling interests | $ | 251 | $ | (526 | ) | |||
Balance, end of period | $ | 2,524 | $ | 1,866 | ||||
Total equity | $ | 157,330 | $ | 154,168 | ||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | ||||||||
Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests | $ | 7,185 | $ | 5,822 | ||||
Net change inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (332 | ) | 3,935 | |||||
Total comprehensive income | $ | 6,853 | $ | 9,757 | ||||
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interests | $ | (39 | ) | $ | (80 | ) | ||
Comprehensive income attributable to Citigroup | $ | 6,892 | $ | 9,837 | ||||
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements
CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
| Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008(1) | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations | ||||||||
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests | $ | 5,822 | $ | (7,550 | ) | |||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | (50 | ) | 56 | |||||
Citigroup's net income (loss) | $ | 5,872 | $ | (7,606 | ) | |||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | (261 | ) | 278 | |||||
Gain (loss) on sale, net of taxes | 2 | (313 | ) | |||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests | $ | 6,131 | $ | (7,571 | ) | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits | 196 | 167 | ||||||
Additions to deferred policy acquisition costs | (221 | ) | (222 | ) | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 859 | 1,410 | ||||||
Provision for credit losses | 22,343 | 12,628 | ||||||
Change in trading account assets | 48,322 | 33,545 | ||||||
Change in trading account liabilities | (47,786 | ) | 7,386 | |||||
Change in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 1,324 | 53,897 | ||||||
Change in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | (31,804 | ) | (58,136 | ) | ||||
Change in brokerage receivables net of brokerage payables | (7,763 | ) | 6,348 | |||||
Net losses (gains) from sales of investments | (1,231 | ) | 258 | |||||
Change in loans held-for-sale | (820 | ) | 16,340 | |||||
Other, net | (10,287 | ) | (12,902 | ) | ||||
Total adjustments | $ | (26,868 | ) | $ | 60,719 | |||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations | $ | (20,737 | ) | $ | 53,148 | |||
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations | ||||||||
Change in deposits at interest with banks | $ | (12,689 | ) | $ | 1,421 | |||
Change in loans | (86,734 | ) | (134,903 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans | 127,034 | 142,939 | ||||||
Purchases of investments | (120,361 | ) | (213,470 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of investments | 47,441 | 59,265 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investments | 57,536 | 131,466 | ||||||
Capital expenditures on premises and equipment | (615 | ) | (1,509 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates, and repossessed assets | 4,845 | 2,216 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations | $ | 16,457 | $ | (12,575 | ) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations | ||||||||
Dividends paid | $ | (2,539 | ) | $ | (3,873 | ) | ||
Issuance of common stock | — | 4,961 | ||||||
Issuance (redemptions) of preferred stock | — | 27,424 | ||||||
Treasury stock acquired | (2 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Stock tendered for payment of withholding taxes | (108 | ) | (325 | ) | ||||
Issuance of long-term debt | 60,205 | 49,878 | ||||||
Payments and redemptions of long-term debt | (66,652 | ) | (57,780 | ) | ||||
Change in deposits | 30,552 | (22,588 | ) | |||||
Change in short-term borrowings | (20,497 | ) | (32,043 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities of continuing operations | $ | 959 | $ | (34,352 | ) | |||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | $ | 171 | $ | 212 | ||||
Net cash from discontinued operations | $ | 812 | $ | 185 | ||||
Change in cash and due from banks | $ | (2,338 | ) | $ | 6,618 | |||
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period | $ | 29,253 | $ | 38,206 | ||||
Cash and due from banks at end of period | $ | 26,915 | $ | 44,824 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations | ||||||||
Cash (received) paid during the period for income taxes | $ | (585 | ) | $ | 915 | |||
Cash paid during the period for interest | $ | 15,084 | $ | 30,856 | ||||
Non-cash investing activities | ||||||||
Transfers to repossessed assets | $ | 1,363 | $ | 1,505 | ||||
| Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations | ||||||||
Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests | $ | 7,185 | $ | 5,822 | ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | 60 | (50 | ) | |||||
Citigroup's net income | $ | 7,125 | $ | 5,872 | ||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | 144 | (261 | ) | |||||
Gain on sale, net of taxes | 64 | 2 | ||||||
Income from continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests | $ | 6,917 | $ | 6,131 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits | 168 | 196 | ||||||
Additions to deferred policy acquisition costs | 1,966 | (221 | ) | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 1,243 | 859 | ||||||
Provision for credit losses | 14,783 | 22,343 | ||||||
Change in trading account assets | 23,461 | 48,322 | ||||||
Change in trading account liabilities | (6,511 | ) | (47,786 | ) | ||||
Change in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | (8,762 | ) | 1,324 | |||||
Change in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 41,831 | (31,804 | ) | |||||
Change in brokerage receivables net of brokerage payables | (9,310 | ) | (7,763 | ) | ||||
Net losses (gains) from sales of investments | (1,061 | ) | (1,292 | ) | ||||
Change in loans held-for-sale | (1,694 | ) | (820 | ) | ||||
Other, net | (21,430 | ) | (9,916 | ) | ||||
Total adjustments | $ | 34,684 | $ | (26,558 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations | $ | 41,601 | $ | (20,427 | ) | |||
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations | ||||||||
Change in deposits with banks | $ | 6,634 | $ | (12,689 | ) | |||
Change in loans | 55,314 | (86,734 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans | 3,752 | 127,034 | ||||||
Purchases of investments | (200,847 | ) | (120,361 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of investments | 78,983 | 47,441 | ||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investments | 95,806 | 57,536 | ||||||
Capital expenditures on premises and equipment | (528 | ) | (615 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates, and repossessed assets | 1,164 | 4,845 | ||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations | $ | 40,278 | $ | 16,457 | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations | ||||||||
Dividends paid | $ | — | $ | (2,539 | ) | |||
Issuance of ADIA Upper Decs equity units purchase contract | 1,875 | — | ||||||
Treasury stock acquired | (5 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Stock tendered for payment of withholding taxes | (724 | ) | (108 | ) | ||||
Issuance of long-term debt | 13,153 | 60,205 | ||||||
Payments and redemptions of long-term debt | (41,765 | ) | (66,652 | ) | ||||
Change in deposits | (21,952 | ) | 30,552 | |||||
Change in short-term borrowings | (33,227 | ) | (20,497 | ) | ||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities of continuing operations | $ | (82,645 | ) | $ | 959 | |||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | (48 | ) | 171 | |||||
Net cash from discontinued operations | 51 | 502 | ||||||
Change in cash and due from banks | $ | (763 | ) | $ | (2,338 | ) | ||
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period | 25,472 | 29,253 | ||||||
Cash and due from banks at end of period | $ | 24,709 | $ | 26,915 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period for income taxes | $ | 2,769 | $ | (585 | ) | |||
Cash paid during the period for interest | $ | 12,101 | $ | 15,084 | ||||
Non-cash investing activities | ||||||||
Transfers to repossessed assets | $ | 1,498 | $ | 1,363 | ||||
See Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.
This page intentionally left blank.
CITIBANK, N.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
| Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except shares | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
| (Unaudited) | | |||||
Assets | |||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 20,128 | $ | 20,246 | |||
Deposits with banks | 132,946 | 154,372 | |||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 29,174 | 31,434 | |||||
Trading account assets (including $785 and $914 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) | 143,568 | 156,380 | |||||
Investments (including $5,238 and $3,849 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) | 255,468 | 233,086 | |||||
Loans, net of unearned income | 477,897 | 477,974 | |||||
Allowance for loan losses | (20,872 | ) | (22,685 | ) | |||
Total loans, net | $ | 457,025 | $ | 455,289 | |||
Goodwill | 9,839 | 10,200 | |||||
Intangible assets, including MSRs | 6,237 | 8,243 | |||||
Premises and equipment, net | 4,496 | 4,832 | |||||
Interest and fees receivable | 6,353 | 6,840 | |||||
Other assets | 92,643 | 80,439 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 1,157,877 | $ | 1,161,361 | |||
The following table presents certain assets of consolidated VIEs, which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The assets in the table below include only those assets that can be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs on the following page, and are in excess of those obligations.
| June 30, 2010 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets of consolidated VIEs that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs | |||||
Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits) | $ | 2,228 | |||
Trading account assets | 32 | ||||
Investments | 8,914 | ||||
Loans, net of unearned income | |||||
Consumer (including $2,590 at fair value) | 41,892 | ||||
Corporate (including $392 at fair value) | 21,593 | ||||
Loans, net of unearned income | $ | 63,485 | |||
Allowance for loan losses | (303 | ) | |||
Total loans, net | $ | 63,182 | |||
Other assets | 1,775 | ||||
Total assets of consolidated VIEs that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs | $ | 76,131 | |||
[Statement continues on the following page]
CITIBANK, N.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Continued)
In millions of dollars, except shares | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Unaudited) | | |||||
Assets | |||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 20,387 | $ | 22,107 | |||
Deposits with banks | 171,639 | 156,774 | |||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell | 18,297 | 41,613 | |||||
Trading account assets (including $1,100 and $12,092 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) | 153,031 | 197,052 | |||||
Investments (including $1,707 and $3,028 pledged to creditors at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively) | 190,070 | 165,914 | |||||
Loans, net of unearned income | 525,265 | 555,198 | |||||
Allowance for loan losses | (22,881 | ) | (18,273 | ) | |||
Total loans, net | $ | 502,384 | $ | 536,925 | |||
Goodwill | 9,908 | 10,148 | |||||
Intangible assets | 8,582 | 7,689 | |||||
Premises and equipment, net | 5,005 | 5,331 | |||||
Interest and fees receivable | 6,764 | 7,171 | |||||
Other assets | 79,333 | 76,316 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 1,165,400 | $ | 1,227,040 | |||
Liabilities | |||||||
Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices | $ | 86,285 | $ | 59,808 | |||
Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices | 176,284 | 180,737 | |||||
Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. | 36,655 | 33,769 | |||||
Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. | 456,793 | 480,984 | |||||
Total deposits | $ | 756,017 | $ | 755,298 | |||
Trading account liabilities | 57,215 | 110,599 | |||||
Purchased funds and other borrowings | 107,693 | 116,333 | |||||
Accrued taxes and other expenses | 8,070 | 8,192 | |||||
Long-term debt and subordinated notes | 85,904 | 113,381 | |||||
Other liabilities | 39,774 | 40,797 | |||||
Total liabilities | $ | 1,054,673 | $ | 1,144,600 | |||
Citibank stockholder's equity | |||||||
Capital stock ($20 par value) outstanding shares: 37,534,553 in each period | $ | 751 | $ | 751 | |||
Surplus | 102,263 | 74,767 | |||||
Retained earnings | 20,780 | 21,735 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1) | (13,964 | ) | (15,895 | ) | |||
Total Citibank stockholder's equity | $ | 109,830 | $ | 81,358 | |||
Noncontrolling interest | 897 | 1,082 | |||||
Total equity | $ | 110,727 | $ | 82,440 | |||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 1,165,400 | $ | 1,227,040 | |||
| Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except shares | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
| (Unaudited) | | |||||
Liabilities | |||||||
Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices | $ | 66,524 | $ | 76,729 | |||
Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices | 188,010 | 176,149 | |||||
Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. | 42,256 | 39,414 | |||||
Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. | 474,629 | 479,350 | |||||
Total deposits | $ | 771,419 | $ | 771,642 | |||
Trading account liabilities | 58,703 | 52,010 | |||||
Purchased funds and other borrowings | 63,156 | 89,503 | |||||
Accrued taxes and other expenses | 8,277 | 9,046 | |||||
Long-term debt and subordinated notes | 92,394 | 82,086 | |||||
Other liabilities | 41,206 | 39,181 | |||||
Total liabilities | $ | 1,035,155 | $ | 1,043,468 | |||
Citibank stockholder's equity | |||||||
Capital stock ($20 par value) outstanding shares: 37,534,553 in each period | $ | 751 | $ | 751 | |||
Surplus | 109,099 | 107,923 | |||||
Retained earnings | 23,975 | 19,457 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1) | (12,227 | ) | (11,532 | ) | |||
Total Citibank stockholder's equity | $ | 121,598 | $ | 116,599 | |||
Noncontrolling interest | 1,124 | 1,294 | |||||
Total equity | $ | 122,722 | $ | 117,893 | |||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 1,157,877 | $ | 1,161,361 | |||
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The following table presents certain liabilities of consolidated VIEs, which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The liabilities in the table below include third-party liabilities of consolidated VIEs only, and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. The liabilities also exclude amounts where creditors or beneficial interest holders have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup.
| June 30, 2010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup: | ||||
Short-term borrowings | $ | 28,258 | ||
Long-term debt (including $2,766 at fair value) | 35,862 | |||
Other liabilities | 2,928 | |||
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup | $ | 67,048 | ||
CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
The accompanying Unauditedunaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of June 30, 20092010 and for the three- and six-month periodsperiod ended June 30, 20092010 include the accounts of Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation have been reflected. The accompanying Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, Citigroup's updated 2009 historical financial statements and notes filed on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 25, 2010 and Citigroup's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
Certain financial information that is normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, but is not required for interim reporting purposes, has been condensed or omitted.
Management must make estimates and assumptions that affect the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related footnote disclosures. While management makes its best judgment, actual results could differ from those estimates. Current market conditions increase the risk and complexity of the judgments in these estimates.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior-period's financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation.
As noted above, the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited, including any reclassificationsunaudited.
Citibank, N.A.
Citibank, N.A. is a commercial bank and wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc. Citibank's principal offerings include consumer finance, mortgage lending, and retail banking products and services; investment banking, commercial banking, cash management, trade finance and e-commerce products and services; and private banking products and services.
The Company includes a balance sheet and statement of changes in stockholder's equity for Citibank, N.A. to December 31, 2008 balances relatedprovide information about this entity to shareholders of Citigroup and international regulatory agencies (see Note 21 to the new Citicorp/Citi Holdings organizational structure.
FASB Launches Accounting Standards Codification
The FASB has issued FASB Statement No. 168,The "FASB Accounting Standards Codification™" and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Statement 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (Codification or ASC) as the single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAPConsolidated Financial Statements for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other nongrandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative.further discussion).
Following the Codification, the Board will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification.
GAAP is not intended to be changed as a result of the FASB's Codification project, but it will change the way the guidance is organized and presented. As a result, these changes will have a significant impact on how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in their accounting policies for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. Citigroup has begun the process of implementing the Codification in this quarterly report by providing references to the Codification topics alongside references to the existing standards.
Significant Accounting Policies
The Company's accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management's discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition. The Company has identified six policies as being significant because they require management to make subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. These policies relate to Valuations of Financial Instruments, Allowance for Credit Losses, Securitizations, Goodwill, Income Taxes and Legal Reserves. The Company, in consultation with the Audit and Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors, has reviewed and approved these significant accounting policies, which are further described in the Company's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
A detailed discussion of the Company's accounting policies is included in Citigroup's updated 2009 historical financial statements and notes filed on Form 8-K with the SEC on June 25, 2010.
Principles of Consolidation
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company. The Company consolidates subsidiaries in which it holds, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the voting rights or where it exercises control. Entities where the Company holds 20% to 50% of the voting rights and/or has the ability to exercise significant influence, other than investments of designated venture capital subsidiaries, or investments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option, are accounted for under the equity method, and the pro rata share of their income (loss) is included inOther revenue. Income from investments in less than 20%-owned companies is recognized when dividends are received. As discussed below, Citigroup consolidates entities deemed to be variable interest entities when Citigroup is determined to be the primary beneficiary. Gains and losses on the disposition of branches, subsidiaries, affiliates, buildings, and other investments and charges for management's estimate of impairment in their value that is other than temporary, such that recovery of the carrying amount is deemed unlikely, are included inOther revenue.
ACCOUNTING CHANGES
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial InstrumentsChange in Accounting for Embedded Credit Derivatives
In April 2009,March 2010, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1ASU 2010-11,Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives. The ASU clarifies that certain embedded derivatives, such as those contained in certain securitizations, CDOs and APB 28-1, "Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments," (ASC 825-10-65-1). This FSP requires disclosing qualitativestructured notes, should be considered embedded credit derivatives subject to potential bifurcation and quantitative information aboutseparate fair value accounting. The ASU allows any beneficial interest issued by a securitization vehicle to be accounted for under the fair value of all financial instrumentsoption at transition on a quarterly basis, including methods and significant assumptions usedJuly 1, 2010.
The Company has elected to estimateaccount for the following beneficial interests issued by securitization vehicles under the fair value during the period. These disclosuresoption. Beneficial interests previously classified as held-to-maturity (HTM) were previously only done annually. The disclosures required by this FSP are effective for the quarter endedreclassified to available-for-sale (AFS) on June 30, 2009. This FSP has no effect2010, because as of that reporting date, the Company did not have the intent to hold the beneficial interests until maturity.
The following table also shows the gross gains and gross losses that make up the cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings for reclassified beneficial interests, recorded on how Citigroup accounts for these instruments.July 1, 2010:
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments on Investment Securities
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, "Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments" (FSP FAS 115-2/ASC 320-10-65-1), which amends the recognition guidance for other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI) of
| | July 1, 2010 | | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Cumulative effect adjustment to Retained earnings | | |||||||||||
In millions of dollars at June 30, 2010 | Amortized cost | Gross unrealized losses recognized in AOCI(1) | Gross unrealized gains recognized in AOCI | Fair Value | ||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||
Prime | $ | 390 | $ | — | $ | 49 | $ | 439 | ||||||
Alt-A | 550 | — | 54 | 604 | ||||||||||
Subprime | 221 | — | 6 | 227 | ||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 2,244 | — | 38 | 2,282 | ||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 3,405 | $ | — | $ | 147 | $ | 3,552 | ||||||
Asset-backed securities | ||||||||||||||
Auction rate securities | $ | 4,463 | $ | 401 | $ | 48 | $ | 4,110 | ||||||
Other asset-backed | 3,990 | — | 160 | 4,150 | ||||||||||
Total asset-backed securities | $ | 8,453 | $ | 401 | $ | 208 | $ | 8,260 | ||||||
Total reclassified debt securities | $ | 11,858 | $ | 401 | $ | 355 | $ | 11,812 | ||||||
As a result of the FSP, the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income reflects the full impairment (that is, the difference between the security's amortized cost basis and fair value) on debtsecurity. For securities that the Company intends to sell, orimpairment charges of $176 million were recorded in earnings in the second quarter of 2010. Refer to Note 10 for more details on the total other-than-temporary-impairments recognized during the 3 months and 6 months ended June 30, 2010.
Beginning July 1, 2010, the Company elected to account for these beneficial interests under the fair value option for various reasons, including:
Additional Disclosures Regarding Fair Value Measurements
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06,Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. The ASU requires disclosing the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 of the amortized cost basis. For available-for-sale (AFS)fair value hierarchy and held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities thatdescribing the reasons for the transfers. The disclosures are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The Company adopted ASU 2010-06 as of January 1, 2010. The required disclosures are included in Note 16. Additionally, disclosures of the gross purchases, sales, issuances and settlements activity in Level 3 of the fair value measurement hierarchy will be required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010.
TableElimination of ContentsQualifying Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs) and Changes in the Consolidation Model for VIEs
management In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166,Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166, now incorporated into ASC Topic 860) and SFAS No. 167,Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167, now incorporated into ASC Topic 810). Citigroup adopted both standards on January 1, 2010. Citigroup has no intentelected to sellapply SFAS 166 and believes that it more-likely-than-not willSFAS 167 prospectively. Accordingly, prior periods have not be requiredbeen restated.
SFAS 166 eliminates QSPEs. SFAS 167 details three key changes to sell priorthe consolidation model. First, former QSPEs are now included in the scope of SFAS 167. Second, the FASB has changed the method of analyzing which party to recovery, onlya VIE should consolidate the credit loss componentVIE (known as the primary beneficiary) to a qualitative determination of which party to the VIE has "power," combined with potentially significant benefits or losses, instead of the impairment is recognized in earnings, whileprevious quantitative risks and rewards model. The party that has "power" has the restability to direct the activities of the fair value loss is recognized inAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI).VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance. Third, the new standard requires that the primary beneficiary analysis be re-evaluated whenever circumstances change. The credit loss component recognized in earnings is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not expected to be received over the remaining termprevious rules required reconsideration of the security as projected using the Company's cash flow projections using its base assumptions.primary beneficiary only when specified reconsideration events occurred.
As a result of implementing these new accounting standards, Citigroup consolidated certain of the VIEs and former QSPEs with which it currently has involvement. Further, certain asset transfers, including transfers of portions of assets, that would have been considered sales under SFAS 140, are considered secured borrowings under the new standards.
In accordance with SFAS 167, Citigroup employed three approaches for newly consolidating certain VIEs and former QSPEs as of January 1, 2010. The first approach requires initially measuring the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests of the VIEs and former QSPEs at their carrying values (the amounts at which the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests would have been carried in the Consolidated Financial Statements, if Citigroup had always consolidated these VIEs and former QSPEs). The second approach measures assets at their unpaid principal amount, and is applied where using carrying values is not practicable. The third approach is to elect the fair value option, in which all of the financial assets and liabilities of certain designated VIEs and former QSPEs are recorded at fair value upon adoption of SFAS 167 and continue to be marked-to-market thereafter, with changes in fair value reported in earnings.
Citigroup consolidated all required VIEs and former QSPEs, as of January 1, 2010, at carrying values or unpaid principal amounts, except for certain private label residential mortgage and mutual fund deferred sales commissions VIEs, for which the fair value option was elected. The following tables present the impact of adopting these new accounting standards applying these approaches.
The incremental impact of these changes on GAAP assets and resulting risk-weighted assets for those VIEs and former QSPEs that were consolidated or deconsolidated for accounting purposes as of January 1, 2010 was as follows:
| Incremental | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | GAAP assets | Risk- weighted assets(3) | ||||||
Impact of consolidation | ||||||||
Credit cards | $ | 86.3 | $ | 0.8 | ||||
Commercial paper conduits | 28.3 | 13.0 | ||||||
Student loans | 13.6 | 3.7 | ||||||
Private label consumer mortgages | 4.4 | 1.3 | ||||||
Municipal tender option bonds | 0.6 | 0.1 | ||||||
Collateralized loan obligations | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||||
Mutual fund deferred sales commissions | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||||
Subtotal | $ | 134.2 | $ | 19.9 | ||||
Impact of deconsolidation | ||||||||
Collateralized debt obligations(1) | $ | 1.9 | $ | 3.6 | ||||
Equity-linked notes(2) | 1.2 | 0.5 | ||||||
Total | $ | 137.3 | $ | 24.0 | ||||
The following table reflects the incremental impact of adopting SFAS 166/167 on Citigroup's incomeGAAP assets, liabilities, and stockholders' equity.
In billions of dollars | January 1, 2010 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | |||||
Trading account assets | $ | (9.9 | ) | ||
Investments | (0.6 | ) | |||
Loans | 159.4 | ||||
Allowance for loan losses | (13.4 | ) | |||
Other assets | 1.8 | ||||
Total assets | $ | 137.3 | |||
Liabilities | |||||
Short-term borrowings | $ | 58.3 | |||
Long-term debt | 86.1 | ||||
Other liabilities | 1.3 | ||||
Total liabilities | $ | 145.7 | |||
Stockholders' equity | |||||
Retained earnings | $ | (8.4 | ) | ||
Total stockholders' equity | (8.4 | ) | |||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 137.3 | |||
The preceding tables reflect: (i) the portion of the assets of former QSPEs to which Citigroup, acting as principal, had transferred assets and received sales treatment prior to January 1, 2010 (totaling approximately $712.0 billion), and (ii) the assets of significant VIEs as of January 1, 2010 with which Citigroup is involved (totaling approximately $219.2 billion) that were previously unconsolidated and are required to be consolidated under the new accounting standards. Due to the variety of transaction structures and the level of Citigroup involvement in individual former QSPEs and VIEs, only a portion of the firstformer QSPEs and second quarters of 2009 was higher by $631 million and $1,634 million on a pretax basis $391 million and $1,013 million on an after-tax basis), respectively.VIEs with which the Company is involved were required to be consolidated.
TheIn addition, the cumulative effect of the change includedadopting these new accounting standards as of January 1, 2010 resulted in an increase in the opening balance ofaggregate after-tax charge toRetained earnings at January 1, 2009 of $665 million on a$8.4 billion, reflecting the net effect of an overall pretax basis ($413 million after-tax).charge to
See Note 10Retained earnings (primarily relating to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Investments, for disclosuresestablishment of loan loss reserves and the reversal of residual interests held) of $13.4 billion and the recognition of related deferred tax assets amounting to the Company's investment securities and OTTI.
Measurement of Fair Value in Inactive Markets
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, "Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly" (ASC 820-10-65-4). The FSP reaffirms that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The FSP also reaffirms the need to use judgment in determining if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when the market has become inactive. The adoption of the FSP had no effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
Revisions to the Earnings per Share Calculation
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities" (ASC 260-10-45 to 65). Under the FSP, unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are considered to be a separate class of common stock and included in the EPS calculation using the "two-class method." Citigroup's restricted and deferred share awards meet the definition of a participating security. In accordance with the FSP, restricted and deferred shares are now included in the basic EPS calculation.
Table of Contents$5.0 billion.
The following table shows the effectimpact on certain of Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios of adopting these new accounting standards, reflecting immediate implementation of the FSP on Citigroup's basic and diluted EPSrecently issued final risk-based capital rules regarding SFAS 166/167, was as follows:
As of January 1, 2010 | ||
---|---|---|
Impact | ||
Tier 1 Capital | (141) bps | |
Total Capital | (142) bps | |
Non-consolidation of Certain Investment Funds
The FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-10,Consolidation (Topic 810), Amendments for 2008 and 2009:
| 1Q08 | 2Q08 | 3Q08 | 4Q08 | Full Year 2008 | 1Q09 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share(1) | |||||||||||||||||||
As reported | $ | (1.02 | ) | $ | (0.54 | ) | $ | (0.60 | ) | $ | (3.40 | ) | $ | (5.59 | ) | N/A | |||
Two-class method | $ | (1.03 | ) | $ | (0.55 | ) | $ | (0.61 | ) | $ | (3.40 | ) | $ | (5.61 | ) | $ | (0.18 | ) | |
N/A Not Applicable
Additional Disclosures for Derivative Instruments
On January 1, 2009, the Company adoptedrequirements of SFAS No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment to SFAS 133 (SFAS 161/ASC 815-10-65-1). The standard requires enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments and hedged items that are accounted for under SFAS 133 (ASC 815-10) and related interpretations. No comparative information for periods prior to the effective date is required. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Derivatives Activities, for disclosures related to the Company's hedging activities and derivative instruments. SFAS 161 (ASC 815-10-65-1) had no impact on how Citigroup accounts for these instruments.
Business Combinations
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(revised),Business Combinations (SFAS 141(R)/ASC 805-10), which is designed to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. The Statement replaces SFAS 141,Business Combinations. SFAS 141(R) (ASC 805-10) retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which Statement 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. SFAS 141(R) (ASC 805-10) also retains the guidance in SFAS 141 for identifying and recognizing intangible assets separately from goodwill. The most significant changes in SFAS 141(R) (ASC 805-10) are: (1) acquisition costs and restructuring costs will now be expensed; (2) stock consideration will be measured based on the quoted market price as of the acquisition date instead of the date the deal is announced; and (3) the acquirer will record a 100% step-up to fair value for all assets and liabilities, including the noncontrolling interest portion, and goodwill is recorded as if a 100% interest was acquired.
Citigroup adopted SFAS 141(R) (ASC 805-10) on January 1, 2009, and the standard is applied prospectively.
Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (SFAS 160/ASC 810-10-65-1), which establishes standards for the accounting and reporting of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries (previously called minority interests) in consolidated financial statements and for the loss of control of subsidiaries. Upon adoption, SFAS 160 (ASC 810-10-65-1) requires that the equity interest of noncontrolling shareholders, partners, or other equity holders in subsidiaries be presented as a separate item in Citigroup's stockholders' equity, rather than as a liability. After the initial adoption, when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary must be measured at fair value at the date of deconsolidation.
The gain or loss on the deconsolidation of the subsidiary is measured using the fair value of the remaining investment, rather than the previous carrying amount of that retained investment.
Citigroup adopted SFAS 160 (ASC 810-10-65-1) on January 1, 2009. As a result, $2.392 billion of noncontrolling interests was reclassified fromOther liabilities to Citigroup's Stockholders' equity.
Sale with Repurchase Financing Agreements
In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 140-3, "Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions" (ASC 860-10-40). This FSP provides implementation guidance on whether a security transfer with a contemporaneous repurchase financing involving the transferred financial asset must be evaluated as one linked transaction or two separate de-linked transactions.
The FSP requires the recognition of the transfer and the repurchase agreement as one linked transaction, unless all of167 where the following criteria are met: (1) the initial transfer and the repurchase financing
A securitization entity;
An asset-backed financing is before the maturityentity;
An entity that was formerly considered a qualifying special-purpose entity.
The Company has determined that a majority of the financial asset. The scopeinvestment vehicles managed by Citigroup are provided a deferral from the requirements of this FSP is limitedSFAS 167, because they meet these criteria. These vehicles continue to transfers and subsequent repurchase financingsbe evaluated under the requirements of ASC 810-10, prior to the implementation of SFAS 167 (FIN 46(R)).
Where the Company has determined that certain investment vehicles are entered into contemporaneously or in contemplationsubject to the consolidation requirements of one another. Citigroup adoptedSFAS 167, the FSP on January 1, 2009. The impactconsolidation conclusions reached upon initial application of adopting this FSP was not material.SFAS 167 are consistent with the consolidation conclusions reached under the requirements of ASC 810-10, prior to the implementation of SFAS 167.
TableInvestments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share
As of ContentsDecember 31, 2009, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-12,
Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent), which provides guidance on measuring the fair value of certain alternative investments. The following accounting pronouncements became effective for CitigroupASU permits entities to use net asset value as a practical expedient to measure the fair value of their investments in certain investment funds. The ASU also requires additional disclosures regarding the nature and risks of such investments and provides guidance on January 1, 2009. The impactthe classification of adopting these pronouncementssuch investments as Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. This ASU did not have a material impact on Citigroup's Consolidated Financial Statements.the Company's accounting for its investments in alternative investment funds.
Determining WhetherMultiple Foreign Exchange Rates
In May 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-19,Foreign Currency Issues: Multiple Foreign Currency Exchange Rates. The ASU requires certain disclosure in situations when an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexedentity's reported balances in U.S. dollar monetary assets held by its foreign entities differ from the actual U.S. dollar-denominated balances due to an Entity's Own Stock
EITF Issue 07-5, "Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock" (ASC 815-40).
Transition Guidancedifferent foreign exchange rates used in remeasurement and translation. The ASU also clarifies the reporting for Conforming Changes to Issue No. 98-5
EITF Issue 08-4, "Transition Guidance for Conforming Changes to Issue No. 98-5" (ASC 470-20-65-2).
Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations
EITF Issue 08-6, "Equity Method Investment Accounting Considerations" (ASC 323-10).
Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets
EITF Issue 08-7, "Accounting for Defensive Intangible Assets" (ASC 350-30).
Determinationthe difference between the reported balances and the U.S. dollar-denominated balances upon the initial adoption of highly inflationary accounting. The ASU does not have a material impact on the Useful Life of Intangible AssetsCompany's accounting.
FSP FAS 142-3 "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets" (ASC 350-30).
FUTURE APPLICATIONAPPLICATIONS OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
Fair Value Disclosures about Pension Plan Assets
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, "Employers' Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets" (ASC 715-20-65-2). This FSP requires that information about plan assets be disclosed, on an annual basis, based on the fair value disclosure requirements of SFAS 157 (ASC 820-10). Citigroup will be required to separate plan assets into the three fair value hierarchy levels and provide a rollforward of the changes in fair value of plan assets classified as Level 3 in Citigroup's annual Consolidated Financial Statements.
The disclosures about plan assets required by this FSP are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. This FSP will have no effect on the Company's accounting for plan benefits and obligations.
Loss-Contingency Disclosures
In June 2008,July 2010, the FASB issued ana second exposure draft proposing expanded disclosures regarding loss contingencies accounted for under FASB Statement No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies (ASC 450-10 to 20, and SFAS 141(R) (ASC 805-10).contingencies. This proposal increases the number of loss contingencies subject to disclosure and requires substantial quantitative and qualitative information to be provided about those loss contingencies. The proposed effective date is December 31, 2009, butproposal will have no effectimpact on the Company's accounting for loss contingencies.
Elimination of QSPEsCredit Quality and Changes in the Consolidation ModelAllowance for Variable Interest EntitiesCredit Losses Disclosures
In May 2009,July 2010, the FASB issued SFASASU No. 166,2010-20,AccountingDisclosures about Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and Allowance for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140Credit Losses. (SFAS 166), thatThe ASU requires a greater level of disaggregated information about the allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of financing receivables. The period-end balance disclosure requirements for loans and the allowance for loans losses will eliminate Qualifying Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs) from the guidance in SFAS 140,Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities (ASC 860). This change will have a significant impact on Citigroup's Consolidated Financial Statements as the Company will lose sales treatment for certain assets previously sold to QSPEs, as well as for certain future sales, and for certain transfers of portions of assets that do not meet the definition of participating interests. SFAS 166 isbe effective for fiscal yearsreporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010, while disclosures for activity during a reporting period that beginoccurs in the loan and allowance for loan losses accounts will be effective for reporting periods beginning on or after NovemberDecember 15, 2009.2010.
Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool Accounted for as a Single Asset (ASU No. 2010-18)
Simultaneously,In April 2010, the FASB issued SFASASU No. 167,2010-18,Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool Accounted for as a Single Asset (SFAS 167), which details three key changes to the consolidation model in FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities" (FIN 46(R)/ASC 810-10). First, former QSPEs will now be included in the scope of SFAS 167. In addition, the FASB has changed the method of analyzing which party to a variable interest entity (VIE) should consolidate the VIE (known as the primary beneficiary) to a qualitative determination of which party to the VIE has power combined with potentially significant benefits and losses, instead of the current quantitative risks and rewards model. The entity that has power has the ability to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance. Finally, the new standard
requires that the primary beneficiary analysis be re-evaluated whenever circumstances change. The current rules require reconsideration of the primary beneficiary only when specified reconsideration events occur.
As a result of implementing these new accounting standards, Citigroup expectsthe amendments in this ASU, modifications of loans that are accounted for within a pool do not result in the removal of those loans from the pool, even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consolidate certainconsider whether the pool of the VIEs and former QSPEs with which it currently has involvement. An ongoing evaluation of the application of these new requirements could, with the resolution of certain uncertainties, resultassets in the identification of additional VIEs and QSPEs, other than those presented below, needing to be consolidated. It is not currently anticipated, however, that any such newly identified VIEs and QSPEs would have a significant impact on Citigroup's Consolidated Financial Statements or capital position.
In accordance with SFAS 167, Citigroup is currently evaluating two approaches for consolidating all of the VIEs and QSPEs that it expects to consolidate. The first approach would require initially measuring the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests of the VIEs and QSPEs at their carrying values (the amounts at which the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests wouldloan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The ASU will be effective for reporting periods ending on or after July 15, 2010. The ASU will have been carried inno material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements, if Citigroup wereCompany's financial statements.
Potential Amendments to be designated as the primary beneficiary). The second approach under consideration would be to elect the fair value option, in which all of the financial assets and liabilities of certain designated VIEs and QSPEs would be recorded at fair value upon adoption of SFAS 167 and continue to be marked to market thereafter, with changes in fair value reported in earnings.
While this review has not yet been completed, Citigroup's tentative approach would be to consolidate all of the VIEs and QSPEs that it expects to consolidate at carrying value, except for Local Consumer Lending private label residential mortgages, for which the fair value option would be elected. The following tables present the pro forma impact of adopting these new accounting standards applying this tentative approach. The actual impact of adopting these new accounting requirements could, however, be significantly different, should Citigroup change from this methodology. For instance, if Citigroup were to consolidate its off-balance sheet credit card securitization vehicles applying the fair value option, an associated allowance for loan losses would not be established upon adoption of SFAS 167, with an offsetting charge toRetained earnings. Rather, the charge toRetained earnings would be affected by the difference between the fair value of the assets and liabilities that Citigroup would consolidate, which would result in a lesser charge toRetained earnings than under the carrying value approach.Current Accounting Standards
The pro forma impactFASB is currently working on amendments to existing accounting standards governing financial instruments and lease accounting. Upon completion of these impendingthe standards, the Company will need to re-evaluate its accounting and disclosures. The FASB is proposing sweeping changes to the classification and measurement of financial instruments, hedging and impairment guidance. The FASB is also working on incremental GAAP assets and resulting risk-weighted assets for those VIEs and former QSPEsa project that are currently expectedwould require all leases to be consolidatedcapitalized on the balance sheet. These projects will have significant impacts for accounting purposes as of January 1, 2010 (based on financial information as of June 30, 2009), reflecting Citigroup's present understandingthe Company. However, due to ongoing deliberations of the new requirements, and assuming continued application of existing risk-based capital rules, would be as follows:
| Incremental | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | GAAP assets | Risk- weighted assets(1) | |||||
Credit cards | $ | 85.5 | $ | 0.5 | |||
Commercial paper conduits | 44.5 | — | |||||
Student loans | 14.2 | 4.1 | |||||
Private label consumer mortgages | 9.2 | 5.3 | |||||
Investment funds | 3.3 | 0.5 | |||||
Commercial mortgages | 1.3 | 1.3 | |||||
Muni bonds | 0.7 | 0.1 | |||||
Mutual fund deferred sales commissions | 0.6 | 0.4 | |||||
Total | $ | 159.3 | $ | 12.2 | |||
The above table reflects: (i) the estimated portion of the assets of former QSPEs to which Citigroup, acting as principal, has transferred assets and received sales treatment as of June 30, 2009 (totaling approximately $747.0 billion), and (ii) the estimated assets of significant unconsolidated VIEs as of June 30, 2009 with which Citigroup is involved (totaling approximately $238.4 billion) that would be required to be consolidated under the new accounting standards. Due to the variety of transaction structures and the level of Citigroup involvement in individual former QSPEs and VIEs, only a portion of the former QSPEs and VIEs with whichstandard-setters, the Company is involved is expectedcurrently unable to be consolidated.
In addition,determine the cumulative effect of adopting these new accounting standards as of January 1, 2010, based on financial information as of June 30, 2009, would result in an estimated aggregate after-tax charge toRetained earnings of approximately $8.3 billion, reflecting the net effect of an overall pretax charge toRetained earnings (primarily relating to the establishment of loan loss reserves and the reversal of residual interests held) of approximately $13.3 billion and the recognition of related deferred tax assets amounting to approximately $5.0 billion.future amendments or proposals at this time.
The pro forma impact on certain of Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios of adopting these new accounting standards (based on financial information as of June 30, 2009), and assuming the continued application of the existing risk-based capital rules, would be as follows:
| As of June 30, 2009 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As Reported | Pro Forma | Impact | |||||||
Tier 1 Capital | 12.74 | % | 11.40 | % | (134) bps | |||||
Total Capital | 16.62 | % | 15.30 | % | (132) bps |
The actual impact of adopting the new accounting standards on January 1, 2010 could differ, as financial information changes from the June 30, 2009 estimates and as several uncertainties in the application of these new standards are resolved.
Investment Company Audit Guide (SOP 07-1)
In July 2007, the AICPA issued Statement of Position 07-1, "Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies" (SOP 07-1/07-1) (now incorporated into ASC 946-10)946-10,Financial Services-Investment Companies), which was expected to be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2007. However, in February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date indefinitely by issuing an FSP SOP 07-1-1, "Effective Date of AICPA Statement of Position 07-1." This statement sets forth more stringent criteria for qualifying as an investment company than does the predecessor Audit Guide. In addition, SOP 07-1(ASC 946-10)946-10 (SOP 07-1) establishes new criteria for a parent company or equity method investor to retain investment company accounting in their consolidated financial statements. Investment companies record all their investments at fair value with changes in value reflected in earnings. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting SOP 07-1(ASC 946-10).the SOP.
Sale of Nikko Cordial
On MayOctober 1, 2009, Citigroup entered into a definitive agreement to sell its Japanese domestic securities business, conducted principally throughthe Company announced the successful completion of the sale of Nikko Cordial Securities Inc., to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation in aCorporation. The transaction withhad a total cash value to Citi of approximately $7.9776 billion (¥774.5 billion)yen (U.S. $8.7 billion at an exchange rate of 89.60 yen to U.S. $1.00 as of September 30, 2009). Citi's ownership interestsThe cash value is composed of the purchase price for the transferred business of 545 billion yen, the purchase price for certain Japanese-listed equity securities held by Nikko Cordial Securities of 30 billion yen, and 201 billion yen of excess cash derived through the repayment of outstanding indebtedness to Citi. After considering the impact of foreign exchange hedges of the proceeds of the transaction, the sale resulted in Nikko Citigroup Limited, Nikko Asset Management Co., Ltd., and Nikko Principal Investments Japan Ltd. were notan immaterial gain in 2009. A total of about 7,800 employees are included in the transaction. The transaction is expected to close by the end of the fourth quarter of 2009, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions.
The Nikko Cordial operations had total assets and total liabilities as of June 30, 2009, of $19.4approximately $24 billion and $12.4$16 billion, respectively.respectively, at the time of sale, which were reflected in Citi Holdings prior to the sale.
Results for all of the Nikko Cordial businesses sold are reported asDiscontinued operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the businesses being sold are included inAssets of discontinued operations held for sale andLiabilities of discontinued operations held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The following is a summary as of June 30, 2009 of the assets and liabilities ofDiscontinued operations held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the operations related to the Nikko Cordial businesses to be sold:
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | |||||
Cash due from banks | $ | 800 | |||
Deposits at interest with banks | 443 | ||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 3,306 | ||||
Brokerage receivables | 1,711 | ||||
Trading account assets | 6,185 | ||||
Investments | 486 | ||||
Goodwill | 533 | ||||
Intangibles | 3,085 | ||||
Other assets | 2,863 | ||||
Total assets | $ | 19,412 | |||
Liabilities | |||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase sold under agreements to repurchase | $ | 1,473 | |||
Brokerage payables | 2,488 | ||||
Trading account liabilities | 2,289 | ||||
Short term borrowings | 4,300 | ||||
Other Liabilities | 1,824 | ||||
Total liabilities | $ | 12,374 | |||
Summarized financial information for discontinued operations, including cash flows, related to the sale of Nikko Cordial follows:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 112 | $ | 539 | $ | 380 | $ | 823 | |||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | (248 | ) | $ | 105 | $ | (382 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | ||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes | (83 | ) | 43 | (133 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | $ | (165 | ) | $ | 62 | $ | (249 | ) | $ | 5 | |||
| Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
Cash flows from operating activities | $ | 4,129 | $ | (1,535 | ) | ||
Cash flows from investing activities | (5,472 | ) | (3,229 | ) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities | 2,126 | 5,134 | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations | $ | 783 | $ | 370 | |||
Sale of Citigroup's German Retail Banking Operations
On December 5, 2008, Citigroup sold its German retail banking operations to Credit Mutuel for Euro 5.2 billion in cash plus the German retail bank's operating net earnings accrued in 2008 through the closing. The sale resulted in an after-tax gain of approximately $3.9 billion including the after-tax gain on the foreign currency hedge of $383 million recognized during the fourth quarter of 2008.
The sale did not include the corporate and investment banking business or the Germany-based European data center. Results for all of the German retail banking businesses sold, are reported asDiscontinued operations for all periods presented.
Summarized financial information forDiscontinued operations, including cash flows, related to the sale of the German retail banking operationsNikko Cordial is as follows:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 30 | $ | 575 | $ | 36 | $ | 1,154 | |||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | (20 | ) | $ | 189 | $ | (39 | ) | $ | 348 | |||
Gain (loss) on sale(1) | — | — | (41 | ) | — | ||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes | (41 | ) | 67 | (48 | ) | 123 | |||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | $ | 21 | $ | 122 | $ | (32 | ) | $ | 225 | ||||
| Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
Cash flows from operating activities | $ | 8 | $ | (2,116 | ) | ||
Cash flows from investing activities | — | 432 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities | (8 | ) | 1,498 | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations | $ | — | $ | (186 | ) | ||
| Three Months June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | — | $ | 112 | $ | 92 | $ | 380 | |||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | — | $ | (248 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (382 | ) | ||
Gain on sale | — | — | 94 | — | |||||||||
Benefit for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes | — | (83 | ) | (122 | ) | (133 | ) | ||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | $ | — | $ | (165 | ) | $ | 209 | $ | (249 | ) | |||
CitiCapital
On July 31, 2008, Citigroup sold substantially all of CitiCapital, the equipment finance unit inNorth America. The total proceeds from the transaction were approximately $12.5 billion and resulted in an after-tax loss to Citigroup of $305 million. This loss is included inIncome from discontinued operations on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income for the second quarter of 2008.
Results for all of the CitiCapital businesses sold, are reported asDiscontinued operations for all periods presented.
Summarized financial information forDiscontinued operations, including cash flows, related to the sale of CitiCapital is as follows:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 21 | $ | (281 | ) | $ | 30 | $ | (82 | ) | |||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 43 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 47 | |||
Gain (loss) on sale(1) | 14 | (517 | ) | 14 | (517 | ) | |||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrollinginterest, net of taxes | 1 | (196 | ) | 1 | (204 | ) | |||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | $ | 2 | $ | (278 | ) | $ | 3 | $ | (266 | ) | |||
| Six Months Ended June 30, | Six Months June 30, | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities | $ | — | $ | (287 | ) | $ | (134 | ) | $ | (1,194 | ) | |||
Cash flows from investing activities | — | 349 | 185 | 1,667 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities | — | (61 | ) | — | — | |||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations | $ | — | $ | 1 | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by discontinued operations | $ | 51 | $ | 473 | ||||||||||
Combined Results for Discontinued Operations
The following is summarized financial information for the Nikko Cordial business, German retail banking operations and CitiCapital business. The German retail banking operation, which was sold on December 5, 2008, and the Citi Capital business, which was sold on July 31, 2008, continue to have minimal residual costs associated with the sales. Additionally, contingency consideration payments received during the first quarter of 2009 of $29 million pretax ($19 million after-tax) related to the sale of Citigroup's Asset Management business, which was sold in December 2005, is also included in these balances.
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 163 | $ | 833 | $ | 446 | $ | 1,895 | |||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | (279 | ) | $ | 337 | $ | (431 | ) | $ | 391 | |||
Gain (loss) on sale | 14 | (517 | ) | 2 | (517 | ) | |||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes | (123 | ) | (86 | ) | (170 | ) | (91 | ) | |||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes | $ | (142 | ) | $ | (94 | ) | $ | (259 | ) | $ | (35 | ) | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 18 | $ | 163 | $ | 135 | $ | 446 | |||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (279 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (431 | ) | |
Gain on sale | — | 14 | 94 | 2 | |||||||||
Benefit for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes | — | (123 | ) | (122 | ) | (170 | ) | ||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (142 | ) | $ | 208 | $ | (259 | ) | ||
Cash Flowsflows from Discontinued Operationsdiscontinued operations
| Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
Cash flows from operating activities | $ | 4,137 | $ | (3,938 | ) | ||
Cash flows from investing activities | (5,443 | ) | (2,448 | ) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities | 2,118 | 6,571 | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations | $ | 812 | $ | 185 | |||
| Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Cash flows from operating activities | $ | (132 | ) | $ | (1,175 | ) | |
Cash flows from investing activities | 186 | 1,686 | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities | (3 | ) | (9 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by discontinued operations | $ | 51 | $ | 502 | |||
The following table presents certain information regarding the Company's operations by segment:
| Revenues, net of interest expense | Provision (benefit) for income taxes | Income (loss) from continuing operations(1) | Identifiable assets(2) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars, except identifiable assets in billions | Jun. 30, 2009 | Dec. 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regional Consumer Banking | $ | 5,605 | $ | 6,881 | $ | (102 | ) | $ | 331 | $ | 217 | $ | 991 | $ | 198 | $ | 200 | |||||||||
Institutional Clients Group | 9,355 | 9,885 | 1,332 | 1,313 | 2,841 | 2,442 | 787 | 802 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal Citicorp | 14,960 | 16,766 | 1,230 | 1,644 | 3,058 | 3,433 | 985 | 1,002 | ||||||||||||||||||
Citi Holdings | 15,750 | 2,079 | 712 | (3,323 | ) | 1,359 | (5,225 | ) | 649 | 715 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate/Other | (741 | ) | (1,307 | ) | (1,035 | ) | (768 | ) | (30 | ) | (537 | ) | 213 | 221 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 29,969 | $ | 17,538 | $ | 907 | $ | (2,447 | ) | $ | 4,387 | $ | (2,329 | ) | $ | 1,847 | $ | 1,938 | ||||||||
| Revenues, net of interest expense(1) | Provision (benefit) for income taxes | Income (loss) from continuing operations(1)(2) | Identifiable assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars, except identifiable assets in billions | Jun. 30, 2010 | Dec. 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Regional Consumer Banking | $ | 8,032 | $ | 6,201 | $ | 336 | $ | 7 | $ | 1,177 | $ | 424 | $ | 309 | $ | 257 | ||||||||||
Institutional Clients Group | 8,457 | 9,184 | 940 | 1,143 | 2,619 | 2,812 | 902 | 882 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal Citicorp | 16,489 | 15,385 | 1,276 | 1,150 | 3,796 | 3,236 | 1,211 | 1,139 | ||||||||||||||||||
Citi Holdings | 4,919 | 15,325 | (646 | ) | 789 | (1,197 | ) | 1,182 | 465 | 487 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate/Other | 663 | (741 | ) | 182 | (1,032 | ) | 129 | (31 | ) | 262 | 231 | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 22,071 | $ | 29,969 | $ | 812 | $ | 907 | $ | 2,728 | $ | 4,387 | $ | 1,938 | $ | 1,857 | ||||||||||
| Revenues, net of interest expense | Provision (benefit) for income taxes | Income (loss) from continuing operations(1) | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||
Regional Consumer Banking | $ | 11,376 | $ | 13,855 | $ | (57 | ) | $ | 878 | $ | 801 | $ | 2,322 | |||||||
Institutional Clients Group | 24,153 | 20,020 | 4,756 | 2,497 | 9,939 | 5,759 | ||||||||||||||
Subtotal Citicorp | 35,529 | 33,875 | 4,699 | 3,375 | 10,740 | 8,081 | ||||||||||||||
Citi Holdings | 19,202 | (2,439 | ) | (2,974 | ) | (9,093 | ) | (3,977 | ) | (14,375 | ) | |||||||||
Corporate/Other | (241 | ) | (1,741 | ) | 17 | (615 | ) | (682 | ) | (1,221 | ) | |||||||||
Total | $ | 54,490 | $ | 29,695 | $ | 1,742 | $ | (6,333 | ) | $ | 6,081 | $ | (7,515 | ) | ||||||
| Revenues, net of interest expense(1) | Provision (benefit) for income taxes | Income (loss) from continuing operations(1)(2) | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Regional Consumer Banking | $ | 16,114 | $ | 12,554 | $ | 563 | $ | 163 | $ | 2,191 | $ | 1,215 | ||||||||
Institutional Clients Group | 18,897 | 23,758 | 2,770 | 4,361 | 6,766 | 9,852 | ||||||||||||||
Subtotal Citicorp | 35,011 | 36,312 | 3,333 | 4,524 | 8,957 | 11,067 | ||||||||||||||
Citi Holdings | 11,469 | 18,419 | (1,592 | ) | (2,799 | ) | (2,073 | ) | (4,303 | ) | ||||||||||
Corporate/Other | 1,012 | (241 | ) | 107 | 17 | 93 | (683 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 47,492 | $ | 54,490 | $ | 1,848 | $ | 1,742 | $ | 6,977 | $ | 6,081 | ||||||||
4. INTEREST REVENUE AND EXPENSE
For the three- and six-monthsix- month periods ended June 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, interest revenue and expense consisted of the following:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008(1) | 2009 | 2008(1) | |||||||||
Interest revenue | |||||||||||||
Loan interest, including fees | $ | 11,929 | $ | 15,941 | $ | 24,784 | $ | 32,355 | |||||
Deposits at interest with banks | 377 | 761 | 813 | 1,537 | |||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell | 794 | 2,370 | 1,679 | 5,536 | |||||||||
Investments, including dividends | 3,435 | 2,548 | 6,611 | 5,235 | |||||||||
Trading account assets(2) | 2,921 | 4,634 | 5,872 | 9,425 | |||||||||
Other interest | 215 | 1,083 | 495 | 2,410 | |||||||||
Total interest revenue | $ | 19,671 | $ | 27,337 | $ | 40,254 | $ | 56,498 | |||||
Interest expense | |||||||||||||
Deposits | $ | 2,840 | $ | 5,082 | $ | 5,688 | $ | 11,276 | |||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 931 | 2,947 | 2,035 | 6,838 | |||||||||
Trading account liabilities(2) | 69 | 450 | 177 | 779 | |||||||||
Short-term borrowing | 315 | 961 | 778 | 2,309 | |||||||||
Long-term debt | 2,687 | 3,911 | 5,821 | 8,222 | |||||||||
Total interest expense | $ | 6,842 | $ | 13,351 | $ | 14,499 | $ | 29,424 | |||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 12,829 | $ | 13,986 | $ | 25,755 | $ | 27,074 | |||||
Provision for loan losses | 12,233 | 6,983 | 22,148 | 12,560 | |||||||||
Net interest revenue after provision for loan losses | $ | 596 | $ | 7,003 | $ | 3,607 | $ | 14,514 | |||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Interest revenue | |||||||||||||
Loan interest, including fees | $ | 14,227 | $ | 11,929 | $ | 28,900 | $ | 24,784 | |||||
Deposits with banks | 291 | 377 | 581 | 813 | |||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell | 781 | 794 | 1,533 | 1,679 | |||||||||
Investments, including dividends | 2,986 | 3,435 | 6,095 | 6,611 | |||||||||
Trading account assets(1) | 2,011 | 2,921 | 3,883 | 5,872 | |||||||||
Other interest | 122 | 215 | 278 | 495 | |||||||||
Total interest revenue | $ | 20,418 | $ | 19,671 | $ | 41,270 | $ | 40,254 | |||||
Interest expense | |||||||||||||
Deposits(2) | $ | 2,036 | $ | 2,840 | $ | 4,116 | $ | 5,688 | |||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 797 | 931 | 1,451 | 2,035 | |||||||||
Trading account liabilities(1) | 106 | 69 | 169 | 177 | |||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 215 | 315 | 491 | 778 | |||||||||
Long-term debt | 3,225 | 2,687 | 6,443 | 5,821 | |||||||||
Total interest expense | $ | 6,379 | $ | 6,842 | $ | 12,670 | $ | 14,499 | |||||
Net interest revenue | $ | 14,039 | $ | 12,829 | $ | 28,600 | $ | 25,755 | |||||
Provision for loan losses | 6,523 | 12,233 | 14,889 | 22,148 | |||||||||
Net interest revenue after provision for loan losses | $ | 7,516 | $ | 596 | $ | 13,711 | $ | 3,607 | |||||
5. COMMISSIONS AND FEES
Commissions and fees revenue includes charges to customers for credit and bank cards, including transaction-processing fees and annual fees; advisory and equity and debt underwriting services; lending and deposit-related transactions, such as loan commitments, standby letters of credit and other deposit and loan servicing activities; investment management-related fees, including brokerage services and custody and trust services; and insurance fees and commissions.
The following table presents commissions and fees revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:30:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008(1) | 2009 | 2008(1) | |||||||||
Loan servicing(2) | $ | 1,367 | $ | 1,393 | $ | 1,563 | $ | 1,107 | |||||
Credit cards and bank cards | 1,000 | 997 | 1,977 | 1,792 | |||||||||
Investment banking | 1,071 | 1,186 | 1,885 | 2,391 | |||||||||
Smith Barney | 321 | 744 | 836 | 1,507 | |||||||||
ICG trading-related | 475 | 600 | 822 | 1,302 | |||||||||
Other Consumer | 324 | 320 | 612 | 635 | |||||||||
Transaction services | 327 | 364 | 643 | 717 | |||||||||
Checking-related | 249 | 298 | 512 | 585 | |||||||||
Other ICG | 80 | 114 | 188 | 244 | |||||||||
Primerica | 76 | 107 | 149 | 217 | |||||||||
Corporate finance(3) | 171 | (389 | ) | 421 | (3,500 | ) | |||||||
Other | (24 | ) | 65 | (3 | ) | 143 | |||||||
Total commissions and fees | $ | 5,437 | $ | 5,799 | $ | 9,605 | $ | 7,140 | |||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Credit cards and bank cards | $ | 999 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 1,964 | $ | 1,977 | |||||
Investment banking | 473 | 1,061 | 1,318 | 1,875 | |||||||||
Smith Barney | — | 321 | — | 836 | |||||||||
ICG trading-related | 512 | 514 | 1,002 | 898 | |||||||||
Transaction services | 364 | 328 | 711 | 644 | |||||||||
Other consumer | 305 | 370 | 630 | 611 | |||||||||
Checking-related | 260 | 248 | 533 | 512 | |||||||||
OtherICG | 88 | 80 | 177 | 188 | |||||||||
Primerica-related (prior to March 2010) | — | 76 | 91 | 149 | |||||||||
Loan servicing(1) | 143 | 14 | 282 | 26 | |||||||||
Corporate finance | 87 | 171 | 183 | 421 | |||||||||
Other | (2 | ) | (99 | ) | (17 | ) | (69 | ) | |||||
Total commissions and fees | $ | 3,229 | $ | 4,084 | $ | 6,874 | $ | 8,068 | |||||
Principal transactions revenue consists of realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading activities. Trading activities include revenues from fixed income, equities, credit and commodities products, as well as foreign exchange transactions. Not included in the table below is the impact of net interest revenue related to conform totrading activities, which is an integral part of trading activities' profitability. The following tables present principal transactions revenue for the current period's presentation.three- and six-month periods ended June 30:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010(1) | 2009(1) | 2010(1) | 2009(1) | ||||||||||
Regional Consumer Banking | $ | 79 | $ | 654 | $ | 249 | $ | 945 | ||||||
Institutional Clients Group | 1,632 | 880 | 4,976 | 7,830 | ||||||||||
Subtotal Citicorp | $ | 1,711 | $ | 1,534 | $ | 5,225 | $ | 8,775 | ||||||
Local Consumer Lending | (19 | ) | 3 | (154 | ) | 528 | ||||||||
Brokerage and Asset Management | (3 | ) | 41 | (28 | ) | 24 | ||||||||
Special Asset Pool | 604 | (206 | ) | 1,750 | (4,247 | ) | ||||||||
Subtotal Citi Holdings | $ | 582 | $ | (162 | ) | $ | 1,568 | $ | (3,695 | ) | ||||
Corporate/Other | (76 | ) | 416 | (423 | ) | 621 | ||||||||
Total Citigroup | $ | 2,217 | $ | 1,788 | $ | 6,370 | $ | 5,701 | ||||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010(1) | 2009(1) | 2010(1) | 2009(1) | |||||||||
Interest rate contracts(2) | $ | 2,231 | $ | 1,613 | $ | 3,642 | $ | 6,453 | |||||
Foreign exchange contracts(3) | 262 | 858 | 503 | 1,864 | |||||||||
Equity contracts(4) | (250 | ) | (175 | ) | 315 | 903 | |||||||
Commodity and other contracts(5) | 121 | 130 | 230 | 827 | |||||||||
Credit derivatives(6) | (147 | ) | (638 | ) | 1,680 | (4,346 | ) | ||||||
Total Citigroup | $ | 2,217 | $ | 1,788 | $ | 6,370 | $ | 5,701 | |||||
6.7. RETIREMENT BENEFITS AND INCENTIVE PLANS
The Company has several non-contributory defined benefit pension plans covering certain U.S. employees and has various defined benefit pension and termination indemnity plans covering employees outside the United States. The principal U.S. qualified defined benefit plan which formerly covered substantially all U.S.provides benefits under a cash balance formula. However, employees is closed to new entrants and, effective January 1, 2008, no longer accrues benefits for most employees. Employees satisfying certain age and service requirements remain covered by a prior final average pay formula.
formula under that plan. Effective January 1, 2008, the U.S. qualified pension plan was frozen for most employees. Accordingly, no additional compensation-based contributions have been credited to the cash balance plan for existing plan participants after December 31, 2007. However, certain employees still covered under the prior final pay plan will continue to accrue benefits. The Company also offers post-retirementpostretirement health care and life insurance benefits to certain eligible U.S. retired employees, as well as to certain eligible employees outside the United States. For information
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the "Act") were signed into law in the U.S. in March 2010. One provision of the Act that impacts Citigroup is the elimination of the tax deductibility for benefits paid that are related to the retiree Medicare Part D subsidy starting in 2013. Citigroup is required to recognize the full accounting impact in the period in which the Act is signed, which resulted in a $45 million reduction in deferred tax assets with a corresponding charge to income from continuing operations in the first quarter of 2010. The other provisions of the Act are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's Retirement Benefit PlansCitigroup's pension and Pension Assumptions, see Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.post-retirement plans.
The following tables summarize the components of the net (benefit) expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the threeCompany's U.S. qualified pension plan, post-retirement plans and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.plans outside the United States. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for the U.S. plans, as well as the plans outside the United States.
Net (Benefit) Expense (Benefit)
| Three Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pension Plans | Postretirement Benefit Plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Plans(1) | Plans Outside U.S. | U.S. Plans | Plans Outside U.S. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
Benefits earned during the period | $ | 6 | $ | 7 | $ | 34 | $ | 52 | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | 6 | $ | 12 | ||||||||||
Interest cost on benefit obligation | 163 | 165 | 74 | 99 | 15 | 15 | 22 | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (229 | ) | (234 | ) | (84 | ) | (122 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | (20 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net transition obligation | — | — | (1 | ) | 1 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (benefit) | (2 | ) | — | 2 | 1 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss | 2 | — | 18 | 4 | — | — | 5 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net expense (benefit) | $ | (60 | ) | $ | (62 | ) | $ | 43 | $ | 35 | $ | 12 | $ | 13 | $ | 13 | $ | 21 | ||||||||
| Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pension Plans | Postretirement Benefit Plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. Plans(1) | Plans Outside U.S. | U.S. Plans | Plans Outside U.S. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||
Benefits earned during the period | $ | 12 | $ | 15 | $ | 71 | $ | 103 | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | 13 | $ | 19 | ||||||||||
Interest cost on benefit obligation | 326 | 329 | 144 | 182 | 30 | 30 | 43 | 50 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (458 | ) | (467 | ) | (162 | ) | (250 | ) | (5 | ) | (5 | ) | (38 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net transition obligation | — | — | (1 | ) | 1 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (benefit) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | 2 | 2 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss | 2 | — | 33 | 13 | 1 | — | 9 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net expense (benefit) | $ | (119 | ) | $ | (124 | ) | $ | 87 | $ | 51 | $ | 26 | $ | 26 | $ | 27 | $ | 23 | ||||||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pension Plans | Postretirement Benefit Plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. plans(1) | Non-U.S. plans | U.S. plans | Non-U.S. plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
Benefits earned during the period | $ | 5 | $ | 6 | $ | 41 | $ | 34 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 6 | $ | 6 | ||||||||||
Interest cost on benefit obligation | 160 | 163 | 86 | 74 | 15 | 15 | 26 | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (212 | ) | (229 | ) | (93 | ) | (84 | ) | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | (25 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net transition obligation | — | — | — | (1 | ) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (benefit) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | 1 | 2 | 2 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss | 11 | 2 | 14 | 18 | 1 | — | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net (benefit) expense | $ | (37 | ) | $ | (60 | ) | $ | 49 | $ | 43 | $ | 16 | $ | 12 | $ | 12 | $ | 13 | ||||||||
| Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pension Plans | Postretirement Benefit Plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| U.S. plans(1) | Non-U.S. plans | U.S. plans | Non-U.S. plans | ||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
Benefits earned during the period | $ | 9 | $ | 12 | $ | 82 | $ | 71 | $ | — | $ | — | 12 | $ | 13 | |||||||||||
Interest cost on benefit obligation | 319 | 326 | 170 | 144 | 29 | 30 | 52 | 43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets | (423 | ) | (458 | ) | (187 | ) | (162 | ) | (4 | ) | (5 | ) | (50 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net transition obligation | — | — | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (benefit) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | 2 | 2 | 2 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss | 22 | 2 | 28 | 33 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net (benefit) expense | $ | (74 | ) | $ | (119 | ) | $ | 94 | $ | 87 | $ | 29 | $ | 26 | 24 | $ | 27 | |||||||||
Employer Contributions
Citigroup's pension funding policy for U.S. plans and non-U.S. plans is generally to fund to applicable minimum funding requirements, rather than to the amounts of accumulated benefit obligations. For the U.S. plans,qualified pension plan, the Company may increase its contributions above the minimum required contribution under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, (ERISA),as amended, if appropriate to its tax and cash position and the plan's funded position. At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, thereThere were no minimum required contributions and no discretionary cash or non-cash contributions are currently planned for the U.S. plans at June 30, 2010. For the non-U.S. pension plans, the Company contributed $58 million as of June 30, 2010 and expects to contribute an additional $103 million in 2010. The Company also expects to contribute $34 million of benefits to be paid directly by the Company on behalf of the non-U.S. pension plans. For the non-U.S. postretirement benefit plans, expected cash contributions for 2010 are $75 million, which includes $3 million of benefits to be paid directly by the Company. These estimates are subject to change, since contribution decisions are affected by various factors, such as market performance and regulatory requirements; in addition, management has the ability to change funding policy.
Stock-Based Incentive Compensation
The Company contributed $79recognized compensation expense related to incentive plans of $269 million duringfor the three months ended June 30, 2010, and $654 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009. Citigroup presently anticipates contributing an additional $1522010. The Company granted 353 million to fund its non-U.S. plans in the remainder of 2009 for a total of $231 million.
7. RESTRUCTURING
In the fourth quarter of 2008, Citigroup recorded a pretax restructuring expense of $1.581 billion related to the implementation of a Company-wide re-engineering plan. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, Citigroup recorded a pretax net restructuring release of $32 million composed of a gross charge of $25 million and a credit of $57 million due to changes in estimates. The charges related to the 2008 Re-engineering Projects Restructuring Initiative are reported in the Restructuring line on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income and are recorded in each segment.
In 2007, the Company completed a review of its structural expense base in a Company-wide effort to create a more streamlined organization, reduce expense growth, and provide investment funds for future growth initiatives. As a result of this review, a pretax restructuring charge of $1.4 billion was recorded inCorporate/Other during the first quarter of 2007. Additional net charges of $151 million were recognized in subsequent quarters throughout 2007, and net releases of $31 million and $3 million in 2008 and 2009, due to changes in estimates. The charges related to the 2007 Structural Expense Review Restructuring Initiative are reported in the Restructuring line on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.
The primary goals of the 2008 Re-engineering Projects Restructuring Initiative and the 2007 Structural Expense Review Restructuring Initiative were:
The implementation of these restructuring initiatives also caused certain related premises and equipment assets to become redundant. The remaining depreciable lives of these assets were shortened, and accelerated depreciation charges beganshares as equity awards in the second quarter, of 2007 and fourthwhich 346 million shares were issued in settlement of Common Stock Equivalent (CSE) awards, as approved by shareholders at the 2010 annual meeting. CSEs were awarded in the first quarter of 2008 for the 2007 and 2008 initiatives, respectively, in addition to normal scheduled depreciation.
The following tables detail the Company's restructuring reserves.
2008 Re-engineering Projects Restructuring Charges
| Severance | | | | | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract termination costs | Asset write-downs(3) | Employee termination cost | Total Citigroup | |||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | SFAS 112(1) | SFAS 146(2) | |||||||||||||||||
Total Citigroup (pretax) | |||||||||||||||||||
Original restructuring charge | $ | 1,254 | $ | 79 | $ | 55 | $ | 123 | $ | 19 | $ | 1,530 | |||||||
Utilization | (114 | ) | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | (100 | ) | — | (219 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 | $ | 1,140 | $ | 76 | $ | 53 | $ | 23 | $ | 19 | $ | 1,311 | |||||||
Additional charge | $ | 14 | $ | 6 | $ | 4 | $ | 5 | $ | — | $ | 29 | |||||||
Foreign exchange | (14 | ) | — | — | (12 | ) | (1 | ) | (27 | ) | |||||||||
Utilization | (541 | ) | (76 | ) | (11 | ) | (7 | ) | (5 | ) | (640 | ) | |||||||
Changes in estimates | (38 | ) | (1 | ) | — | — | — | (39 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2009 | $ | 561 | $ | 5 | $ | 46 | $ | 9 | $ | 13 | $ | 634 | |||||||
Additional charge | $ | 6 | $ | 17 | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | $ | — | $ | 25 | |||||||
Foreign exchange | 26 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 29 | |||||||||||||
Utilization | (190 | ) | (19 | ) | (8 | ) | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | (221 | ) | |||||||
Changes in estimates | (53 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | — | (2 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2009 | $ | 350 | $ | 2 | $ | 40 | $ | 8 | $ | 10 | $ | 410 | |||||||
Note: The total Citigroup charge in the table above does not include a $51 million one-time pension curtailment charge related to this restructuring initiative, which is recorded2010 as part of incentive compensation for the Company'sRestructuring charge2009 performance year in accordance with the terms of Citi's TARP repayment program. These awards were accrued for in 2009, and are not reflected in the Consolidated Statementexpense numbers presented for 2010. The number of Income at December 31, 2008.shares delivered to recipients was equal to their individual CSE award value divided by the fair market value of Citi common stock determined as of the grant date ($4.93), less shares withheld for taxes, as applicable. In accordance with the terms of the shareholder-approved program, the CSE awards were settled by new issues of common stock. Traditionally, Citi has settled equity award transactions by delivering shares from treasury stock.
On April 20, 2010, 39 million stock options were issued to certain employees. The stock options issued vest one-third each on October 29, 2010, 2011, and 2012. The strike price of these options is $4.88 per share.
2007 Structural Expense Review Restructuring Charges
| Severance | | | | | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contract termination costs | Asset write-downs(3) | Employee termination cost | Total Citigroup | |||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | SFAS 112(1) | SFAS 146(2) | |||||||||||||||||
Total Citigroup (pretax) | |||||||||||||||||||
Original restructuring charge | $ | 950 | $ | 11 | $ | 25 | $ | 352 | $ | 39 | $ | 1,377 | |||||||
Additional charge | $ | 42 | $ | 96 | $ | 29 | $ | 27 | $ | 11 | $ | 205 | |||||||
Foreign exchange | 19 | — | 2 | — | — | 21 | |||||||||||||
Utilization | (547 | ) | (75 | ) | (28 | ) | (363 | ) | (33 | ) | (1,046 | ) | |||||||
Changes in estimates | (39 | ) | — | (6 | ) | (1 | ) | (8 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2007 | $ | 425 | $ | 32 | $ | 22 | $ | 15 | $ | 9 | $ | 503 | |||||||
Additional charge | $ | 10 | $ | 14 | $ | 43 | $ | 6 | $ | — | $ | 73 | |||||||
Foreign exchange | (11 | ) | — | (4 | ) | — | — | (15 | ) | ||||||||||
Utilization | (288 | ) | (34 | ) | (22 | ) | (7 | ) | (6 | ) | (357 | ) | |||||||
Changes in estimates | (93 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | (104 | ) | |||||||
Balance at December 31, 2008 | $ | 43 | $ | 10 | $ | 37 | $ | 10 | $ | — | $ | 100 | |||||||
Foreign exchange | (1 | ) | — | (1 | ) | — | — | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Utilization | (41 | ) | (10 | ) | (35 | ) | (9 | ) | — | (95 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in estimates | (1 | ) | — | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | — | (3 | ) | |||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2009 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Note: The 2007 structural expense review restructuring initiative was fully utilized as of March 31, 2009.
The total restructuring reserve balance and total charges as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 related to the 2008 Re-engineering Projects Restructuring Initiatives are presented below by business in the following tables. These charges are reported in the Restructuring line on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income and are recorded in each business.
2008 Re-engineering Projects
| For the quarter ended June 30, 2009 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Total restructuring reserve balance as of June 30, 2009 | Restructuring charges recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2009 | Total restructuring charges since inception(1)(2) | |||||||
Citicorp | $ | 198 | $ | 10 | $ | 859 | ||||
Citi Holdings | 34 | 10 | 246 | |||||||
Corporate/Other | 178 | 5 | 383 | |||||||
Total Citigroup (pretax) | $ | 410 | $ | 25 | $ | 1,488 | ||||
| For the year ended December 31, 2008 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Total restructuring reserve balance as of December 31, 2008 | Total restructuring charges(1) | |||||
Citicorp | $ | 789 | $ | 890 | |||
Citi Holdings | 184 | 267 | |||||
Corporate/Other | 338 | 373 | |||||
Total Citigroup (pretax) | $ | 1,311 | $ | 1,530 | |||
8. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following is a reconciliation of the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) computations for the three and six months ended June 30,30:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions, except per-share amounts | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Income before attribution of noncontrolling interests | $ | 2,728 | $ | 4,387 | $ | 6,977 | $ | 6,081 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests | 28 | (34 | ) | 60 | (50 | ) | ||||||||
Net income from continuing operations (for EPS purposes) | $ | 2,700 | $ | 4,421 | $ | 6,917 | $ | 6,131 | ||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | (3 | ) | (142 | ) | 208 | (259 | ) | |||||||
Citigroup's net income (loss) | $ | 2,697 | $ | 4,279 | $ | 7,125 | $ | 5,872 | ||||||
Preferred dividends | — | (1,495 | ) | — | (2,716 | ) | ||||||||
Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance | — | — | — | (1,285 | ) | |||||||||
Preferred stock Series H discount accretion | — | (54 | ) | — | (107 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders | $ | 2,697 | $ | 2,730 | $ | 7,125 | $ | 1,764 | ||||||
Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities | 26 | 105 | 57 | 69 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders for basic EPS | $ | 2,671 | $ | 2,625 | $ | 7,068 | $ | 1,695 | ||||||
Effect of dilutive securities | — | 270 | — | 540 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) allocated to common shareholders for diluted EPS | $ | 2,671 | $ | 2,895 | $ | 7,068 | $ | 2,235 | ||||||
Weighted-average common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS | 28,849.4 | 5,399.5 | 28,646.9 | 5,392.3 | ||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities | ||||||||||||||
TDECs | 876.2 | — | 879.5 | — | ||||||||||
Other employee plans | 22.8 | — | 14.2 | — | ||||||||||
Convertible securities | 0.7 | 568.3 | 0.7 | 568.3 | ||||||||||
Options | 3.5 | — | 1.8 | — | ||||||||||
Adjusted weighted-average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS | 29,752.6 | 5,967.8 | 29,543.1 | 5,960.6 | ||||||||||
Basic earnings per share | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||
Discontinued operations | — | (0.02 | ) | 0.01 | (0.05 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.31 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.51 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.36 | ||||||
Discontinued operations | — | (0.02 | ) | 0.01 | (0.05 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 0.09 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.31 | ||||||
During the second quarters of 2010 and 2009, weighted-average options to purchase 98.1 million and 2008:117.2 million shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of earnings per common share, because the weighted-average exercise prices of $28.35 and $40.19, respectively, were greater than the average market price of the Company's common stock.
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions, except per share amounts | 2009 | 2008(1) | 2009 | 2008(1) | |||||||||
Income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests | $ | 4,387 | $ | (2,329 | ) | $ | 6,081 | $ | (7,515 | ) | |||
Noncontrolling interest | (34 | ) | 72 | (50 | ) | 56 | |||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations (for EPS purposes) | $ | 4,421 | $ | (2,401 | ) | $ | 6,131 | $ | (7,571 | ) | |||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | (142 | ) | (94 | ) | (259 | ) | (35 | ) | |||||
Citigroup's net income (loss) | $ | 4,279 | $ | (2,495 | ) | $ | 5,872 | $ | (7,606 | ) | |||
Preferred dividends | (1,495 | ) | (361 | ) | (2,716 | ) | (444 | ) | |||||
Impact on the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance(2) | — | — | (1,285 | ) | — | ||||||||
Preferred stock Series H discount accretion | (54 | ) | — | (107 | ) | — | |||||||
Income (loss) available to common stockholders for basic EPS(3) | 2,730 | (2,856 | ) | 1,764 | (8,050 | ) | |||||||
Effect of dilutive securities | 270 | 270 | 540 | 336 | |||||||||
Income (loss) available to common stockholders for diluted EPS(4) | $ | 3,000 | $ | (2,586 | ) | $ | 2,304 | $ | (7,714 | ) | |||
Weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS | 5,399.5 | 5,287.4 | 5,392.3 | 5,186.5 | |||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: | |||||||||||||
Convertible securities | 568.3 | 489.2 | 568.3 | 489.2 | |||||||||
Options | — | 0.2 | — | 0.6 | |||||||||
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS(3) | 5,967.8 | 5,776.8 | 5,960.6 | 5,676.3 | |||||||||
Basic earnings per share(3)(4) | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 0.51 | $ | (0.53 | ) | $ | 0.36 | $ | (1.56 | ) | |||
Discontinued operations | (0.02 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.01 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 0.49 | $ | (0.55 | ) | $ | 0.31 | $ | (1.57 | ) | |||
Diluted earnings per share(3)(4) | |||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 0.51 | $ | (0.53 | ) | $ | 0.36 | $ | (1.56 | ) | |||
Discontinued operations | (0.02 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (0.01 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) | $ | 0.49 | $ | (0.55 | ) | $ | 0.31 | $ | (1.57 | ) | |||
Warrants issued to the current period's presentation.
Equity awards granted under the Management Committee Long-Term Incentive Plan (MC LTIP) were not included in the 2009 computation of earnings per common share, because the performance targets under the terms of the awards were not met and, as a private offeringresult, the awards expired in January 2008. The conversion price was reset from $31.62the first quarter of 2010. In addition, other performance-based equity awards of approximately 5 million shares were not included in the second quarter 2010 earnings per share to $26.35 per share.
Equity units convertible into approximately 177 million shares and 235 million shares of Citigroup common shareholders for Basic EPSstock held by the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) were not included in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, loss available to common stockholders for basic EPS was used to calculate Dilutedcomputation of earnings per share. Adding back the effect of dilutive securities would result in anti-dilution.
9. TRADING ACCOUNT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Trading account assets andTrading account liabilities, at fair value, consisted of the following at June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trading account assets | ||||||||
Trading mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||
Agency guaranteed | $ | 27,174 | $ | 32,981 | ||||
Prime | 1,051 | 1,416 | ||||||
Alt-A | 1,307 | 913 | ||||||
Subprime | 10,583 | 14,552 | ||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 1,586 | 2,447 | ||||||
Commercial | 3,635 | 2,501 | ||||||
Total Trading mortgage-backed securities | $ | 45,336 | $ | 54,810 | ||||
U.S. Treasury and Federal Agencies | ||||||||
U.S. Treasuries | $ | 9,763 | $ | 7,370 | ||||
Agency and direct obligations | 4,290 | 4,017 | ||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and Federal Agencies | $ | 14,053 | $ | 11,387 | ||||
State and municipal securities | $ | 6,056 | $ | 9,510 | ||||
Foreign government securities | 57,670 | 57,422 | ||||||
Corporate | 55,780 | 54,654 | ||||||
Derivatives(1) | 73,158 | 115,289 | ||||||
Equity securities | 39,932 | 48,503 | ||||||
Other debt securities | 33,052 | 26,060 | ||||||
Total trading account assets | $ | 325,037 | $ | 377,635 | ||||
Trading account liabilities | ||||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | $ | 55,764 | $ | 50,693 | ||||
Derivatives(1) | 63,548 | 116,785 | ||||||
Total trading account liabilities | $ | 119,312 | $ | 167,478 | ||||
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trading account assets | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities(1) | ||||||||
U.S. government agency guaranteed | $ | 24,911 | $ | 20,638 | ||||
Prime | 1,663 | 1,156 | ||||||
Alt-A | 1,399 | 1,229 | ||||||
Subprime | 2,511 | 9,734 | ||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 2,378 | 2,368 | ||||||
Commercial | 3,229 | 3,455 | ||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities(1) | $ | 36,091 | $ | 38,580 | ||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | ||||||||
U.S. Treasuries | $ | 21,641 | $ | 28,938 | ||||
Agency and direct obligations | 4,184 | 2,041 | ||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | $ | 25,825 | $ | 30,979 | ||||
State and municipal securities | 6,646 | $ | 7,147 | |||||
Foreign government securities | 80,504 | 72,769 | ||||||
Corporate | 49,132 | 51,985 | ||||||
Derivatives(2) | 56,521 | 58,879 | ||||||
Equity securities | 34,720 | 46,221 | ||||||
Asset-backed securities(1) | 5,952 | 4,089 | ||||||
Other debt securities | 14,021 | 32,124 | ||||||
Total trading account assets | $ | 309,412 | $ | 342,773 | ||||
Trading account liabilities | ||||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | $ | 71,728 | $ | 73,406 | ||||
Derivatives(2) | 59,273 | 64,106 | ||||||
Total trading account liabilities | $ | 131,001 | $ | 137,512 | ||||
10. INVESTMENTS
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Securities available-for-sale | $ | 191,238 | $ | 175,189 | |||
Debt securities held-to-maturity(1) | 59,622 | 64,459 | |||||
Non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value(2) | 7,935 | 9,262 | |||||
Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost(3) | 7,962 | 7,110 | |||||
Total investments | $ | 266,757 | $ | 256,020 | |||
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Securities available-for-sale | $ | 270,913 | $ | 239,599 | |||
Debt securities held-to-maturity(1) | 31,283 | 51,527 | |||||
Non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value(2) | 6,698 | 6,830 | |||||
Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost(3) | 8,172 | 8,163 | |||||
Total investments | $ | 317,066 | $ | 306,119 | |||
Securities Available-for-Sale
The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale (AFS) at June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 20082009 were as follows:
| June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Amortized cost | Gross unrealized gains | Gross unrealized losses | Fair value | Amortized cost | Gross unrealized gains | Gross unrealized losses | Fair value | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities available-for-sale: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agency guaranteed | $ | 28,289 | $ | 377 | $ | 225 | $ | 28,441 | $ | 23,527 | $ | 261 | $ | 67 | $ | 23,721 | ||||||||||
Prime | 8,017 | 86 | 2,070 | 6,033 | 8,475 | 3 | 2,965 | 5,513 | ||||||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 483 | 52 | 12 | 523 | 54 | — | 9 | 45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subprime | 35 | — | 18 | 17 | 38 | — | 21 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 286 | — | 7 | 279 | 185 | 2 | — | 187 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 947 | 3 | 161 | 789 | 519 | — | 134 | 385 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 38,057 | $ | 518 | $ | 2,493 | $ | 36,082 | $ | 32,798 | $ | 266 | $ | 3,196 | 29,868 | |||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | 7,730 | 10 | 129 | 7,611 | 3,465 | 125 | — | 3,590 | ||||||||||||||||||
Agency obligations | 16,738 | 35 | 96 | 16,677 | 20,237 | 215 | 77 | 20,375 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | $ | 24,468 | $ | 45 | $ | 225 | $ | 24,288 | $ | 23,702 | $ | 340 | $ | 77 | $ | 23,965 | ||||||||||
State and municipal | 19,890 | 93 | 2,305 | 17,678 | 18,156 | 38 | 4,370 | 13,824 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign government | 74,590 | 914 | 350 | 75,154 | 79,505 | 945 | 408 | 80,042 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate | 21,388 | 266 | 333 | 21,321 | 10,646 | 65 | 680 | 10,031 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 11,387 | 123 | 620 | 10,890 | 11,784 | 36 | 224 | 11,596 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total debt securities available- for-sale | 189,780 | 1,959 | 6,326 | 185,413 | 176,591 | 1,690 | 8,955 | 169,326 | ||||||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities available-for-sale | 4,339 | 2,299 | 813 | 5,825 | 5,768 | 554 | 459 | 5,863 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale | $ | 194,119 | $ | 4,258 | $ | 7,139 | $ | 191,238 | $ | 182,359 | $ | 2,244 | $ | 9,414 | $ | 175,189 | ||||||||||
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Amortized cost | Gross unrealized gains | Gross unrealized Losses | Fair value | Amortized cost | Gross unrealized gains | Gross unrealized losses | Fair value | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities AFS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-agency guaranteed | $ | 19,706 | $ | 693 | $ | 1 | $ | 20,398 | $ | 20,625 | $ | 339 | $ | 50 | $ | 20,914 | ||||||||||
Prime | 6,453 | 57 | 852 | 5,658 | 7,291 | 119 | 932 | 6,478 | ||||||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 655 | 56 | 1 | 710 | 538 | 93 | 4 | 627 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subprime | 117 | 6 | — | 123 | 1 | — | — | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 2,426 | 42 | 7 | 2,461 | 258 | — | 3 | 255 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 670 | 25 | 56 | 639 | 883 | 10 | 100 | 793 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 30,027 | $ | 879 | $ | 917 | $ | 29,989 | $ | 29,596 | $ | 561 | $ | 1,089 | $ | 29,068 | ||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | 39,058 | 602 | — | 39,660 | 26,857 | 36 | 331 | 26,562 | ||||||||||||||||||
Agency obligations | 44,050 | 521 | 1 | 44,570 | 27,714 | 46 | 208 | 27,552 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | $ | 83,108 | $ | 1,123 | $ | 1 | $ | 84,230 | $ | 54,571 | $ | 82 | $ | 539 | $ | 54,114 | ||||||||||
State and municipal | 17,555 | 150 | 2,131 | 15,574 | 16,677 | 147 | 1,214 | 15,610 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign government | 97,653 | 1,382 | 164 | 98,871 | 101,987 | 860 | 328 | 102,519 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate | 16,146 | 412 | 63 | 16,495 | 20,024 | 435 | 146 | 20,313 | ||||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities(1) | 18,157 | 240 | 445 | 17,952 | 10,089 | 50 | 93 | 10,046 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 2,229 | 30 | 65 | 2,194 | 2,179 | 21 | 77 | 2,123 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total debt securities AFS | $ | 264,875 | $ | 4,216 | $ | 3,786 | $ | 265,305 | $ | 235,123 | $ | 2,156 | $ | 3,486 | $ | 233,793 | ||||||||||
Marketable equity securities AFS | $ | 3,958 | $ | 1,911 | $ | 261 | $ | 5,608 | $ | 4,089 | $ | 1,929 | $ | 212 | $ | 5,806 | ||||||||||
Total securities AFS | $ | 268,833 | $ | 6,127 | $ | 4,047 | $ | 270,913 | $ | 239,212 | $ | 4,085 | $ | 3,698 | $ | 239,599 | ||||||||||
The As discussed in more detail below, the Company conducts and documents periodic reviews of all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is other than temporary. As discussed in more detail below, prior to January 1, 2009, these reviews were conducted pursuant to FASB Staff Position No. 115-1,The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments (FSP FAS 115-1/ASC 320-10-35).other-than-temporary. Any unrealized loss identified as other than temporary was recorded directly in the Consolidated Statement of Income. As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 (ASC 320-10-65-1). Accordingly, any credit-related impairment related to debt securities the Company does not planintend to sell and is more-likely-than-not not likely to be required to sell is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income, with the non-credit-related impairment recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI).OCI. For other impaired debt securities that the Company intends to sell, the entire impairment is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
The table below shows the fair value of investments in AFS securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months or for 12 months or longer as of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:
| Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollar | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | ||||||||||||||
June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agency guaranteed | $ | 9,754 | $ | 108 | $ | 2,116 | $ | 117 | $ | 11,870 | $ | 225 | ||||||||
Prime | 5,019 | 2,016 | 256 | 54 | 5,275 | 2,070 | ||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 94 | 2 | 49 | 10 | 143 | 12 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime | 4 | 1 | 13 | 17 | 17 | 18 | ||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 279 | 7 | — | — | 279 | 7 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 118 | 55 | 499 | 106 | 617 | 161 | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | 15,268 | 2,189 | 2,933 | 304 | 18,201 | 2,493 | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | 4,841 | 125 | 49 | 4 | 4,890 | 129 | ||||||||||||||
Agency obligations | 4,306 | 89 | 2,223 | 7 | 6,529 | 96 | ||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | 9,147 | 214 | 2,272 | 11 | 11,419 | 225 | ||||||||||||||
State and municipal | 11,084 | 1,297 | 4,500 | 1,008 | 15,584 | 2,305 | ||||||||||||||
Foreign government | 11,563 | 164 | 5,733 | 186 | 17,296 | 350 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | 2,039 | 84 | 1,947 | 249 | 3,986 | 333 | ||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 404 | 98 | 4,871 | 522 | 5,275 | 620 | ||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities available-for-sale | 2,063 | 742 | 134 | 71 | 2,197 | 813 | ||||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale | $ | 51,568 | $ | 4,788 | $ | 22,390 | $ | 2,351 | $ | 73,958 | $ | 7,139 | ||||||||
December 31, 2008(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agency guaranteed | $ | 5,281 | $ | 9 | $ | 432 | $ | 58 | $ | 5,713 | $ | 67 | ||||||||
Prime | 2,258 | 1,127 | 3,108 | 1,838 | 5,366 | 2,965 | ||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 38 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 43 | 9 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime | — | — | 15 | 21 | 15 | 21 | ||||||||||||||
Non- U.S. residential | 10 | — | — | — | 10 | — | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 213 | 33 | 233 | 101 | 446 | 134 | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | 7,800 | 1,177 | 3,793 | 2,019 | 11,593 | 3,196 | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Agency obligations | 1,654 | 76 | 1 | 1 | 1,655 | 77 | ||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | 1,654 | 76 | 1 | 1 | 1,655 | 77 | ||||||||||||||
State and municipal | 12,827 | 3,872 | 3,762 | 498 | 16,589 | 4,370 | ||||||||||||||
Foreign government | 10,697 | 201 | 9,080 | 207 | 19,777 | 408 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | 1,985 | 270 | 4,393 | 410 | 6,378 | 680 | ||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 944 | 96 | 303 | 128 | 1,247 | 224 | ||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities available-for-sale | 3,254 | 386 | 102 | 73 | 3,356 | 459 | ||||||||||||||
Total securities available-for-sale | $ | 39,161 | $ | 6,078 | $ | 21,434 | $ | 3,336 | $ | 60,595 | $ | 9,414 | ||||||||
| Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | ||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Securities AFS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-agency guaranteed | $ | 225 | $ | 1 | $ | 23 | $ | — | $ | 248 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
Prime | 96 | 6 | 4,532 | 846 | 4,628 | 852 | ||||||||||||||
Alt-A | — | — | 7 | 1 | 7 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | — | — | 413 | 7 | 413 | 7 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 70 | 17 | 39 | 39 | 109 | 56 | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 391 | $ | 24 | $ | 5,014 | $ | 893 | $ | 5,405 | $ | 917 | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | 200 | — | — | — | 200 | — | ||||||||||||||
Agency obligations | 1,317 | 1 | — | — | 1,317 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | $ | 1,517 | $ | 1 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,517 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
State and municipal | 208 | 21 | 9,640 | 2,110 | 9,848 | 2,131 | ||||||||||||||
Foreign government | 29,732 | 72 | 2,994 | 92 | 32,726 | 164 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | 913 | 35 | 406 | 28 | 1,319 | 63 | ||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 1,125 | 357 | 5,220 | 88 | 6,345 | 445 | ||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | — | — | 526 | 65 | 526 | 65 | ||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities AFS | 89 | 3 | 2,255 | 258 | 2,344 | 261 | ||||||||||||||
Total securities AFS | $ | 33,975 | $ | 513 | $ | 26,055 | $ | 3,534 | $ | 60,030 | $ | 4,047 | ||||||||
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Securities AFS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-agency guaranteed | $ | 6,793 | $ | 47 | $ | 263 | $ | 3 | $ | 7,056 | $ | 50 | ||||||||
Prime | 5,074 | 905 | 228 | 27 | 5,302 | 932 | ||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 106 | — | 35 | 4 | 141 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 250 | 3 | — | — | 250 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 93 | 2 | 259 | 98 | 352 | 100 | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 12,316 | $ | 957 | $ | 785 | $ | 132 | $ | 13,101 | $ | 1,089 | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | 23,378 | 224 | 308 | 107 | 23,686 | 331 | ||||||||||||||
Agency obligations | 17,957 | 208 | 7 | — | 17,964 | 208 | ||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | $ | 41,335 | $ | 432 | $ | 315 | $ | 107 | $ | 41,650 | $ | 539 | ||||||||
State and municipal | 754 | 97 | 10,630 | 1,117 | 11,384 | 1,214 | ||||||||||||||
Foreign government | 39,241 | 217 | 10,398 | 111 | 49,639 | 328 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | 1,165 | 47 | 907 | 99 | 2,072 | 146 | ||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 627 | 4 | 986 | 89 | 1,613 | 93 | ||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 28 | 2 | 647 | 75 | 675 | 77 | ||||||||||||||
Marketable equity securities AFS | 102 | 4 | 2,526 | 208 | 2,628 | 212 | ||||||||||||||
Total securitiesAFS | $ | 95,568 | $ | 1,760 | $ | 27,194 | $ | 1,938 | $ | 122,762 | $ | 3,698 | ||||||||
The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of debt securities AFSavailable-for-sale by contractual maturity dates as of June 30, 2009,2010 and December 31, 2008:2009:
| June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008(1) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Amortized cost | Fair value | Amortized cost | Fair value | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities(2) | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 18 | $ | 18 | $ | 87 | $ | 80 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 146 | 142 | 639 | 567 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 700 | 663 | 1,362 | 1,141 | |||||||||
After 10 years(3) | 37,193 | 35,259 | 30,710 | 28,080 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 38,057 | $ | 36,082 | $ | 32,798 | $ | 29,868 | |||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 7,560 | $ | 7,556 | $ | 15,736 | $ | 15,846 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 6,609 | 6,593 | 5,755 | 5,907 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 5,864 | 5,832 | 1,902 | 1,977 | |||||||||
After 10 years(3) | 4,435 | 4,307 | 309 | 235 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 24,468 | $ | 24,288 | $ | 23,702 | $ | 23,965 | |||||
State and municipal | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 216 | $ | 212 | $ | 214 | $ | 214 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 129 | 134 | 84 | 84 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 690 | 703 | 411 | 406 | |||||||||
After 10 years(3) | 18,855 | 16,629 | 17,447 | 13,120 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 19,890 | $ | 17,678 | $ | 18,156 | $ | 13,824 | |||||
Foreign government | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 29,089 | $ | 28,291 | $ | 26,481 | $ | 26,937 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 37,851 | 38,045 | 45,652 | 45,462 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 6,380 | 6,101 | 6,771 | 6,899 | |||||||||
After 10 years(3) | 1,270 | 2,717 | 601 | 744 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 74,590 | $ | 75,154 | $ | 79,505 | $ | 80,042 | |||||
All other(4) | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 3,152 | $ | 3,152 | $ | 4,160 | $ | 4,319 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 23,273 | 22,782 | 2,662 | 2,692 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 2,669 | 2,199 | 12,557 | 11,842 | |||||||||
After 10 years(3) | 3,681 | 4,078 | 3,051 | 2,774 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 32,775 | $ | 32,211 | $ | 22,430 | $ | 21,627 | |||||
Total debt securities available-for-sale | $ | 189,780 | $ | 185,413 | $ | 176,591 | $ | 169,326 | |||||
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Amortized Cost | Fair value | Amortized cost | Fair value | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities(1) | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 2 | $ | 3 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 9 | 9 | 16 | 16 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 519 | 506 | 626 | 597 | |||||||||
After 10 years(2) | 29,499 | 29,474 | 28,952 | 28,452 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 30,027 | $ | 29,989 | $ | 29,596 | $ | 29,068 | |||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 11,011 | $ | 11,033 | $ | 5,357 | $ | 5,366 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 56,288 | 56,913 | 35,912 | 35,618 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 13,170 | 13,534 | 8,815 | 8,773 | |||||||||
After 10 years(2) | 2,639 | 2,750 | 4,487 | 4,357 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 83,108 | $ | 84,230 | $ | 54,571 | $ | 54,114 | |||||
State and municipal | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 14 | $ | 14 | $ | 7 | $ | 8 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 145 | 152 | 119 | 129 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 209 | 215 | 340 | 359 | |||||||||
After 10 years(2) | 17,187 | 15,193 | 16,211 | 15,114 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 17,555 | $ | 15,574 | $ | 16,677 | $ | 15,610 | |||||
Foreign government | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 35,137 | $ | 35,221 | $ | 32,223 | $ | 32,365 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 54,865 | 55,652 | 61,165 | 61,426 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 6,855 | 7,061 | 7,844 | 7,845 | |||||||||
After 10 years(2) | 796 | 937 | 755 | 883 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 97,653 | $ | 98,871 | $ | 101,987 | $ | 102,519 | |||||
All other(3) | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 2,821 | $ | 2,830 | $ | 4,243 | $ | 4,244 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 20,087 | 20,247 | 14,286 | 14,494 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 3,182 | 3,380 | 9,483 | 9,597 | |||||||||
After 10 years(2) | 10,442 | 10,184 | 4,280 | 4,147 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 36,532 | $ | 36,641 | $ | 32,292 | $ | 32,482 | |||||
Total debt securities AFS | $ | 264,875 | $ | 265,305 | $ | 235,123 | $ | 233,793 | |||||
The following tables present interest and dividends on all investments for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:
| Three months ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | |||||
Taxable interest | $ | 3,115 | $ | 2,194 | |||
Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax | 247 | 210 | |||||
Dividends | 73 | 144 | |||||
Total interest and dividends | $ | 3,435 | $ | 2,548 | |||
| Six months ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | |||||
Taxable interest | $ | 6,031 | $ | 4,583 | |||
Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax | 462 | 399 | |||||
Dividends | 118 | 253 | |||||
Total interest and dividends | $ | 6,611 | $ | 5,235 | |||
| Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | |||||||||
Taxable interest | $ | 2,675 | $ | 3,115 | $ | 5,543 | $ | 6,128 | |||||
Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax | 197 | 247 | 370 | 365 | |||||||||
Dividends | 114 | 73 | 182 | 118 | |||||||||
Total interest and dividends | $ | 2,986 | $ | 3,435 | $ | 6,095 | $ | 6,611 | |||||
The following table presents realized gains and losses on all investments for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 20092010 and 2008.2009. The gross realized investment losses exclude losses from other-than-temporary impairment:
| Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | |||||||||
Gross realized investment gains | $ | 577 | $ | 75 | $ | 1,358 | $ | 314 | |||||
Gross realized investment losses | (42 | ) | (46 | ) | (66 | ) | (88 | ) | |||||
Net realized gains (losses) | $ | 535 | $ | 29 | $ | 1,292 | $ | 226 | |||||
| Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2010 | June 30, 2009 | |||||||||
Gross realized investment gains | $ | 554 | $ | 577 | $ | 1,147 | $ | 1,358 | |||||
Gross realized investment losses(1) | (31 | ) | (42 | ) | (86 | ) | (66 | ) | |||||
Net realized gains | $ | 523 | $ | 535 | $ | 1,061 | $ | 1,292 | |||||
TableContents
Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity
The carrying value and fair value of securities held-to-maturity (HTM) at June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 20082009 were as follows:
In millions of dollars | Amortized cost(1) | Net unrealized loss recognized in OCI | Carrying value(2) | Gross unrecognized gains | Gross unrecognized losses | Fair value | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities held-to-maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agency guaranteed | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | �� | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Prime | 6,991 | 1,362 | 5,629 | 5 | 1,000 | 4,634 | ||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 16,309 | 4,902 | 11,407 | 52 | 2,446 | 9,013 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime | 1,122 | 178 | 944 | 3 | 119 | 828 | ||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 9,702 | 1,195 | 8,507 | 160 | 624 | 8,043 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 1,124 | 23 | 1,101 | — | 392 | 709 | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | 35,248 | 7,660 | 27,588 | 220 | 4,581 | 23,227 | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Agency and direct obligations | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
State and municipal | 3,265 | 142 | 3,123 | 38 | 358 | 2,803 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | 7,220 | 218 | 7,002 | 187 | 526 | 6,663 | ||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 22,334 | 426 | 21,908 | 647 | 824 | 21,731 | ||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 5 | 4 | 1 | — | — | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Total debt securities held-to-maturity | $ | 68,072 | $ | 8,450 | $ | 59,622 | $ | 1,092 | $ | 6,289 | $ | 54,425 | ||||||||
December 31, 2008(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities held-to-maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agency guaranteed | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Prime | 7,481 | 1,436 | 6,045 | — | 623 | 5,422 | ||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 16,658 | 4,216 | 12,442 | 23 | 1,802 | 10,663 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime | 1,368 | 125 | 1,243 | 15 | 163 | 1,095 | ||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 10,496 | 1,128 | 9,368 | 5 | 397 | 8,976 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 1,021 | — | 1,021 | — | 130 | 891 | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | 37,024 | 6,905 | 30,119 | 43 | 3,115 | 27,047 | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | 1 | — | 1 | — | — | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Agency and direct obligations | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | 1 | — | 1 | — | — | 1 | ||||||||||||||
State and municipal | 3,371 | 183 | 3,188 | 14 | 253 | 2,949 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | 6,906 | 175 | 6,731 | 130 | 305 | 6,556 | ||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 22,698 | 415 | 22,283 | 86 | 555 | 21,814 | ||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 2,478 | 341 | 2,137 | — | 127 | 2,010 | ||||||||||||||
Total debt securities held-to-maturity | $ | 72,478 | $ | 8,019 | $ | 64,459 | $ | 273 | $ | 4,355 | $ | 60,377 | ||||||||
In millions of dollars | Amortized cost(1) | Net unrealized loss recognized in AOCI | Carrying value(2) | Gross unrecognized gains | Gross unrecognized losses | Fair value | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities HTM(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Prime | $ | 5,154 | $ | 919 | $ | 4,235 | $ | 191 | $ | 4 | $ | 4,422 | ||||||||
Alt-A | 12,843 | 3,472 | 9,371 | 304 | 139 | 9,536 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime | 880 | 121 | 759 | 29 | 41 | 747 | ||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 5,030 | 786 | 4,244 | 307 | 77 | 4,474 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 1,090 | 26 | 1,064 | — | 138 | 926 | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 24,997 | $ | 5,324 | $ | 19,673 | $ | 831 | $ | 399 | $ | 20,105 | ||||||||
State and municipal | 2,688 | 147 | 2,541 | 89 | 80 | 2,550 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | 6,528 | 182 | 6,346 | 456 | 184 | 6,618 | ||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities(3) | 2,798 | 75 | 2,723 | 26 | 158 | 2,591 | ||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Total debt securities HTM | $ | 37,011 | $ | 5,728 | $ | 31,283 | $ | 1,402 | $ | 821 | $ | 31,864 | ||||||||
December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities HTM(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Prime | $ | 6,118 | $ | 1,151 | $ | 4,967 | $ | 317 | $ | 5 | $ | 5,279 | ||||||||
Alt-A | 14,710 | 4,276 | 10,434 | 905 | 243 | 11,096 | ||||||||||||||
Subprime | 1,087 | 128 | 959 | 77 | 100 | 936 | ||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 9,002 | 1,119 | 7,883 | 469 | 134 | 8,218 | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 1,303 | 45 | 1,258 | 1 | 208 | 1,051 | ||||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 32,220 | $ | 6,719 | $ | 25,501 | $ | 1,769 | $ | 690 | $ | 26,580 | ||||||||
State and municipal | 3,067 | 147 | 2,920 | 92 | 113 | 2,899 | ||||||||||||||
Corporate | 7,457 | 264 | 7,193 | 524 | 182 | 7,535 | ||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities(3) | 16,348 | 435 | 15,913 | 567 | 496 | 15,984 | ||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Total debt securities HTM | $ | 59,092 | $ | 7,565 | $ | 51,527 | $ | 2,952 | $ | 1,481 | $ | 52,998 | ||||||||
The net unrealized losses classified in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) thatAOCI relate to debt securities reclassified from AFS investments to HTM investmentsinvestments. Additionally, for HTM securities that have suffered credit impairment, declines in fair value for reasons other than credit losses are recorded in AOCI. The AOCI balance was $8.5$5.7 billion as of June 30, 2009,2010, compared to $8.0$7.6 billion as of December 31, 2008. This2009. The AOCI balance for HTM securities is amortized over the remaining life of the related securities as an adjustment of yield in a manner consistent with the accretion of discount on the same transferred debt securities. This will have no impact on the Company's net income because the amortization of the unrealized holding loss reported in equity will offset the effect on interest income of the accretion of the discount on these securities.
The credit-related impairment on HTM securities is recognized in earnings.
The table below shows the fair value of investments in HTM that have been in an unrealizedunrecognized loss position for less than 12 months or for 12 months or longer as of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:
| Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | Fair value | Gross unrealized losses | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities held-to-maturity | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | $ | 5,548 | $ | 1,405 | $ | 13,244 | $ | 3,176 | $ | 18,792 | $ | 4,581 | |||||||
State and municipal | 951 | 358 | — | — | 951 | 358 | |||||||||||||
Corporate | 3,997 | 525 | 134 | 1 | 4,131 | 526 | |||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 6,132 | 778 | 1,397 | 46 | 7,529 | 824 | |||||||||||||
Other debt securities | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Total debt securities held-to-maturity | $ | 16,628 | $ | 3,066 | $ | 14,775 | $ | 3,223 | $ | 31,403 | $ | 6,289 | |||||||
December 31, 2008(1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities held-to-maturity | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | $ | 2,348 | $ | 631 | $ | 24,236 | $ | 2,484 | $ | 26,584 | $ | 3,115 | |||||||
State and municipal | 2,499 | 253 | — | — | 2,499 | 253 | |||||||||||||
Corporate | 23 | — | 4,107 | 305 | 4,130 | 305 | |||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 9,051 | 381 | 4,164 | 174 | 13,215 | 555 | |||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 439 | — | 5,246 | 127 | 5,685 | 127 | |||||||||||||
Total debt securities held-to-maturity | $ | 14,360 | $ | 1,265 | $ | 37,753 | $ | 3,090 | $ | 52,113 | $ | 4,355 | |||||||
| Less than 12 months | 12 months or longer | Total | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Fair value | Gross unrecognized losses | Fair value | Gross unrecognized losses | Fair value | Gross unrecognized losses | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities HTM | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | $ | 76 | $ | 14 | $ | 14,048 | $ | 385 | $ | 14,124 | $ | 399 | |||||||
State and municipal | 505 | 38 | 165 | 42 | 670 | 80 | |||||||||||||
Corporate | — | — | 3,091 | 184 | 3,091 | 184 | |||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | — | — | 1,071 | 158 | 1,071 | 158 | |||||||||||||
Other debt securities | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Total debt securities HTM | $ | 581 | $ | 52 | $ | 18,375 | $ | 769 | $ | 18,956 | $ | 821 | |||||||
December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities HTM | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 16,923 | $ | 690 | $ | 16,923 | $ | 690 | |||||||
State and municipal | 755 | 79 | 713 | 34 | 1,468 | 113 | |||||||||||||
Corporate | — | — | 1,519 | 182 | 1,519 | 182 | |||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 348 | 18 | 5,460 | 478 | 5,808 | 496 | |||||||||||||
Other debt securities | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
Total debt securities HTM | $ | 1,103 | $ | 97 | $ | 24,615 | $ | 1,384 | $ | 25,718 | $ | 1,481 | |||||||
Excluded from the gross unrealizedunrecognized losses presented in the above table isare the $8.5$5.7 billion and $8.0$7.6 billion of gross unrealized losses recorded in AOCI mainly related to the HTM securities that were reclassified from AFS investments as of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively. Approximately $5.9 billion and $5.2 billionVirtually all of these unrealized losses relate to securities that have been in a loss position for 12 months or longer at both June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Table of Contents2009.
The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of HTM debt securities HTM by contractual maturity dates as of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:
| June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008(1) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Carrying value | Fair value | Carrying value | Fair value | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 2 | $ | 2 | $ | 88 | $ | 65 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 425 | 274 | 363 | 282 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 532 | 365 | 513 | 413 | |||||||||
After 10 years(2) | 26,629 | 22,586 | 29,155 | 26,287 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 27,588 | $ | 23,227 | $ | 30,119 | $ | 27,047 | |||||
State and municipal | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 4 | $ | 3 | $ | 86 | $ | 86 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 45 | 45 | 105 | 105 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 1,463 | 1,300 | 112 | 106 | |||||||||
After 10 years(2) | 1,611 | 1,455 | 2,885 | 2,652 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 3,123 | $ | 2,803 | $ | 3,188 | $ | 2,949 | |||||
All other(3) | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 6,689 | $ | 7,213 | $ | 4,482 | $ | 4,505 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 7,557 | 7,502 | 10,892 | 10,692 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 10,304 | 9,639 | 6,358 | 6,241 | |||||||||
After 10 years(2) | 4,361 | 4,041 | 9,420 | 8,943 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 28,911 | $ | 28,395 | $ | 31,152 | $ | 30,381 | |||||
Total debt securities held-to-maturity | $ | 59,622 | $ | 54,425 | $ | 64,459 | $ | 60,377 | |||||
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Carrying value | Fair value | Carrying value | Fair value | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 301 | 269 | 466 | 385 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 551 | 481 | 697 | 605 | |||||||||
After 10 years(1) | 18,821 | 19,355 | 24,337 | 25,589 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 19,673 | $ | 20,105 | $ | 25,501 | $ | 26,580 | |||||
State and municipal | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 19 | $ | 20 | $ | 6 | $ | 6 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 52 | 54 | 53 | 79 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 88 | 89 | 99 | 99 | |||||||||
After 10 years(1) | 2,382 | 2,387 | 2,762 | 2,715 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 2,541 | $ | 2,550 | $ | 2,920 | $ | 2,899 | |||||
All other(2) | |||||||||||||
Due within 1 year | $ | 1,187 | $ | 1,193 | $ | 4,652 | $ | 4,875 | |||||
After 1 but within 5 years | 1,247 | 1,330 | 3,795 | 3,858 | |||||||||
After 5 but within 10 years | 4,766 | 4,937 | 6,240 | 6,526 | |||||||||
After 10 years(1) | 1,869 | 1,749 | 8,419 | 8,260 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 9,069 | $ | 9,209 | $ | 23,106 | $ | 23,519 | |||||
Total debt securities HTM | $ | 31,283 | $ | 31,864 | $ | 51,527 | $ | 52,998 | |||||
Evaluating Investments for Other-than-TemporaryOther-Than-Temporary Impairments
The Company conducts and documents periodic reviews of all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is other than temporary. Prior to January 1, 2009, these reviews were conducted pursuant to FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-1,, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments (FSP FAS 115-1/(now incorporated into ASC 320-10-35)320-10-35,Investments—Debt and Equity Securities—Subsequent Measurement). Any unrealized loss identified as other than temporaryother-than-temporary was recorded directly in the Consolidated Statement of Income. As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 (ASC 320-10-65-1)(now incorporated into ASC 320-10-35-34,Investments—Debt and Equity Securities: Recognition of an Other-Than-Temporary Impairment). Accordingly, any credit-relatedThis guidance amends the impairment related tomodel for debt securities; the impairment model for equity securities was not affected.
Under the guidance for debt securities, other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) is recognized in earnings for debt securities which the Company has an intent to sell or which the Company believes it is more-likely-than-not that it will be required to sell prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis. For those securities which the Company does not planintend to sell and is not likelyor expect to be required to sell, credit-related impairment is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income,earnings, with the non-credit-related impairment recognizedrecorded in OCI. For other impaired debt securities, the entire impairment is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income.AOCI.
An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses that are determined to be temporary in nature are recorded, net of tax, in AOCI for AFS securities, while such losses related to HTM securities are not recorded, as these investments are carried at their amortized cost. For securities transferred to HTM fromTrading account assets, amortized cost is defined as the fair value amount of the securities at the date of transfer, plus any accretion income and less any impairment recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer. For securities transferred to HTM from AFS, amortized cost is defined as the original purchase cost, plus or minus any accretion or amortization of a purchase discount or premium, less any impairment recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer.
Regardless of the classification of the securities as AFS or HTM, the Company has assessed each position for credit impairment.
Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include:
The Company's review for impairment generally entails:
For equity securities, management considers the various factors described above, including its intent and ability to hold the equity security for a period of time sufficient for recovery to amortized cost. Where management lacks that intent or ability, the security's decline in fair value is deemed to be other than temporary and is recorded in earnings. AFS equity securities deemed other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to fair value, with the full difference between fair value and cost recognized in earnings.
For debt securities that are not deemed to be credit impaired, management performs additional analysis to assessassesses whether it intends to sell or wouldwhether it is more-likely-than-not notthat it would be required to sell the investment before the expected recovery of the amortized cost basis. In most cases, management has asserted that it has no intent to sell and that it believes it is more-likely-than-not that it will not likely to be required to sell the investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis. Where such an assertion has not been made, the security's decline in fair value is deemed to be other than temporaryother-than-temporary and is recorded in earnings.
For debt securities, a critical component of the evaluation for other-than-temporary impairmentsOTTI is the identification of credit impaired securities, where management does not expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. For securities purchased and classified as AFS with the expectation of receiving full principal and interest cash flows, this analysis considers the likelihood of receiving all contractual principal and interest. For securities reclassified out of the trading category in the fourth quarter of 2008, the analysis consideredconsiders the likelihood of receiving the expected principal and interest cash flows anticipated as of the date of reclassification in the fourth quarter of 2008. The extent of the Company's analysis regarding credit quality and the stress on assumptions used in the analysis have been refined for securities where the current fair value or other characteristics of the security warrant. The paragraphs below describe the Company's process for identifying credit impairment in security types with the most significant unrealized losses as of June 30, 2009.2010.
Mortgage-Backed SecuritiesMortgage-backed securities
For U.S. mortgage-backed securities (and in particular for Alt-A and other mortgage-backed securities that have significant unrealized losses as a percentage of amortized cost), credit impairment is assessed using a cash flow model that estimates the cash flows on the underlying mortgages, using the security-specific collateral and transaction structure. The model estimates cash flows from the underlying mortgage loans and distributes those cash flows to various tranches of securities, considering the transaction structure and any subordination and credit enhancements that exist in that structure. The cash flow model incorporates actual cash flows on the mortgage-backed securities through the current period and then projects the remaining cash flows using a number of assumptions, including default rates, prepayment rates, and recovery rates (on foreclosed properties).
Management develops specific assumptions using as much market data as possible and includes internal estimates
as well as estimates published by rating agencies and other third-party sources. Default rates are projected by considering current underlying mortgage loan performance, generally assuming the default of (1) 10% of current loans, (2) 25% of 30-59 day delinquent loans, (3) 75%70% of 60-90 day delinquent loans and (4) 100% of 91+ day delinquent loans. These estimates are extrapolated along a default timing curve to estimate the total lifetime pool default rate. Other assumptions used contemplate the actual collateral attributes, including geographic concentrations, rating agency loss projections, rating actions and current market prices.
The key base assumptions for mortgage-backed securities as of June 30, 20092010 are in the table below:
| June 30, | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Prepayment rate | 3-8 CRR | |||
Loss severity(1) | 45% | |||
Unemployment rate | ||||
The valuation as of June 30, 2010 assumes that U.S. housing prices are unchanged for the remainder of 2010, increase 0.6% in 2011, increase 1.4% in 2012, increase 2.2% in 2013 and increase 3% per year from 2014 onwards.
In addition, cash flow projections are developed using more stressful parameters, and management assesses the results of those stress tests (including the severity of any cash shortfall indicated and the likelihood of the stress scenarioscenarios actually occurring based on the underlying pool's characteristics and performance) to assess whether management expects to recover the amortized cost basis of the security. If cash flow projections indicate that the Company does not expect to recover its amortized cost basis, the Company recognizes the estimated credit loss in earnings.
State and Municipal Securitiesmunicipal securities
Citigroup's AFS state and municipal bonds consist primarilymainly of bonds that are financed through Tender Option Bond programs. The process for identifying credit impairment for bonds in this program as well as for bonds that were previously financed in this program is largely based on third-party credit ratings. Individual bond positions must meet minimum ratings requirements, which vary based on the sector of the bond issuer. The average portfolio rating, ignoring any insurance, is Aa3/AA-.
Citigroup monitors the bond issuer and insurer ratings on a daily basis. The average portfolio rating, ignoring any insurance, is Aa3/AA-. In the event of a downgrade of the bond below the Aa3/AA-, the subject bond is specifically reviewed for potential shortfall in contractual principal and interest. Citigroup has not recorded any credit impairments on bonds held as part of the Tender Option Bond program or on bonds that were previously held as part of the Tender Option Bond program.
The remainder of Citigroup's AFS state and municipal bonds, outside of the Tender Option Bond Programs,above, are specifically reviewed for credit impairment based on instrument-specific estimates of cash flows, probability of default and loss given default.
Recognition and Measurement of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment
AFS and HTM debt securities that have been identified as other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to their current fair value. For debt securities that are intended to be sold or that management believes more-likely-than-not will be required to be sold prior to recovery, the full impairment is recognized immediately in earnings.
For AFS and HTM debt securities that management has no intent to sell and believes that it more-likely-than-not will not be required to be sold prior to recovery, only the credit loss component of the impairment is recognized in earnings, while the rest of the fair value loss is recognized in OCI. The credit loss component recognized in earnings is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not expected to be received over the remaining term of the security as projected using the Company's cash flow projections using its base assumptions.
AFS equity securities deemed other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to fair value, with the full difference between fair value and amortized cost recognized in earnings.
The following table presents the total other-than-temporary impairmentsOTTI recognized in earnings during the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009:
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (OTTI) on Investments2010:
| Three months ended June 30, 2009 | Six months ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | AFS | HTM | Total | AFS | HTM | Total | ||||||||||||||
Impairment losses related to securities which the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total OTTI losses recognized during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 | $ | 50 | $ | 2,263 | $ | 2,313 | $ | 105 | $ | 3,548 | $ | 3,653 | ||||||||
Less: portion of OTTI loss recognized in OCI (before taxes) | 15 | 1,619 | 1,634 | 29 | 2,236 | 2,265 | ||||||||||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell | $ | 35 | $ | 644 | $ | 679 | $ | 76 | $ | 1,312 | $ | 1,388 | ||||||||
OTTI losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company intends to sell or more-likely-than-not will be required to sell before recovery | 16 | — | 16 | 55 | — | 55 | ||||||||||||||
Total impairment losses recognized in earnings | $ | 51 | $ | 644 | $ | 695 | $ | 131 | $ | 1,312 | $ | 1,443 | ||||||||
OTTI on Investments | Three months ended June 30, 2010 | Six months ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | AFS | HTM | Total | AFS | HTM | Total | |||||||||||||
Impairment losses related to securities which the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell: | |||||||||||||||||||
Total OTTI losses recognized during the periods ended June 30, 2010 | $ | 39 | $ | 217 | $ | 256 | $ | 236 | $ | 549 | $ | 785 | |||||||
Less: portion of OTTI loss recognized in AOCI (before taxes) | 3 | — | 3 | 6 | 40 | 46 | |||||||||||||
Net impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell | $ | 36 | $ | 217 | $ | 253 | $ | 230 | $ | 509 | $ | 739 | |||||||
OTTI losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company intends to sell or more-likely-than-not will be required to sell before recovery | 201 | — | 201 | 222 | — | 222 | |||||||||||||
Total impairment losses recognized in earnings | $ | 237 | $ | 217 | $ | 454 | $ | 452 | $ | 509 | $ | 961 | |||||||
The following is a three-month roll forward3-month roll-forward of the credit-related position recognized in earnings for AFS and HTM debt securities held as of June 30, 2009:2010:
| Cumulative Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | March 31, 2009 Balance | Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities not previously impaired | Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities than have been previously impaired | Reductions due to sales of credit impaired securities sold or matured | June 30, 2009 Balance | ||||||||||||
AFS debt securities | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||
Prime | $ | — | $ | 7 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 7 | |||||||
Commercial real estate | 2 | — | — | — | 2 | ||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | 2 | 7 | — | — | 9 | ||||||||||||
Foreign government | — | 14 | — | — | 14 | ||||||||||||
Corporate | 84 | 8 | 5 | — | 97 | ||||||||||||
Asset backed securities | 2 | 1 | — | — | 3 | ||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 6 | — | — | — | 6 | ||||||||||||
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities | $ | 94 | $ | 30 | $ | 5 | $ | — | $ | 129 | |||||||
HTM debt securities | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||
Prime | $ | 8 | $ | 6 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 14 | |||||||
Alt-A | 1,505 | 396 | — | — | 1,901 | ||||||||||||
Subprime | 95 | 10 | — | — | 105 | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 34 | 62 | — | — | 96 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 4 | — | — | — | 4 | ||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | 1,646 | 474 | — | — | 2,120 | ||||||||||||
Corporate | 221 | 169 | — | (70 | ) | 320 | |||||||||||
Asset backed securities | 32 | — | — | — | 32 | ||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 2 | 1 | — | — | 3 | ||||||||||||
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities | $ | 1,901 | $ | 644 | $ | — | $ | (70 | ) | $ | 2,475 | ||||||
| Cumulative OTTI Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | March 31, 2010 balance | Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities not previously impaired | Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities that have been previously impaired | Reductions due to sales of credit impaired securities sold or matured | June 30, 2010 balance | ||||||||||||
AFS debt securities | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||
Prime | $ | 254 | $ | — | $ | 26 | $ | — | $ | 280 | |||||||
Alt-A | 2 | — | — | — | 2 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 2 | — | — | — | 2 | ||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 258 | $ | — | $ | 26 | $ | — | $ | 284 | |||||||
State and municipal | — | 3 | — | — | 3 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | 35 | 1 | — | — | 36 | ||||||||||||
Foreign government | 154 | 5 | — | — | 159 | ||||||||||||
Corporate | 146 | 1 | — | — | 147 | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 9 | — | — | — | 9 | ||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 52 | — | — | — | 52 | ||||||||||||
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities | $ | 654 | $ | 10 | $ | 26 | $ | — | $ | 690 | |||||||
HTM debt securities | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||
Prime | $ | 246 | $ | 51 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 297 | |||||||
Alt-A | 2,749 | 131 | 6 | — | 2,886 | ||||||||||||
Subprime | 213 | — | — | — | 213 | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 96 | — | — | — | 96 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 9 | 1 | — | — | 10 | ||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 3,313 | $ | 183 | $ | 6 | $ | — | $ | 3,502 | |||||||
State and municipal | 7 | — | — | — | 7 | ||||||||||||
Corporate | 351 | — | — | — | 351 | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 81 | 8 | 19 | — | 108 | ||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 4 | — | 1 | — | 5 | ||||||||||||
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities | $ | 3,756 | $ | 191 | $ | 26 | $ | — | $ | 3,973 | |||||||
The following is a six-month roll forward6-month roll-forward of the credit-related position recognized in earnings for AFS and HTM debt securities held as of June 30, 2009:2010:
| Cumulative Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | January 1, 2009 Balance | Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities not previously impaired | Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities than have been previously impaired | Reductions due to sales of credit impaired securities sold or matured | June 30, 2009 Balance | ||||||||||||
AFS debt securities | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||
Prime | $ | — | $ | 7 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 7 | |||||||
Commercial real estate | 1 | 1 | — | — | 2 | ||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | 1 | 8 | — | — | 9 | ||||||||||||
Foreign government | — | 14 | — | — | 14 | ||||||||||||
Corporate | 53 | 30 | 15 | (1 | ) | 97 | |||||||||||
Asset backed securities | — | 3 | — | — | 3 | ||||||||||||
Other debt securities | — | 6 | — | — | 6 | ||||||||||||
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities | $ | 54 | $ | 61 | $ | 15 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 129 | ||||||
HTM debt securities | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||
Prime | $ | 8 | $ | 6 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 14 | |||||||
Alt-A | 1,091 | 791 | 19 | — | 1,901 | ||||||||||||
Subprime | 85 | 20 | — | — | 105 | ||||||||||||
Non- U.S. residential | 28 | 68 | — | — | 96 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 4 | — | — | — | 4 | ||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | 1,216 | 885 | 19 | — | 2,120 | ||||||||||||
Corporate | — | 390 | — | (70 | ) | 320 | |||||||||||
Asset backed securities | 17 | 15 | — | — | 32 | ||||||||||||
Other debt securities | — | 3 | — | — | 3 | ||||||||||||
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities | $ | 1,233 | $ | 1,293 | $ | 19 | $ | (70 | ) | $ | 2,475 | ||||||
| Cumulative OTTI Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | December 31, 2009 balance | Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities not previously impaired | Credit impairments recognized in earnings on securities that have been previously impaired | Reductions due to sales of credit impaired securities sold or matured | June 30, 2010 balance | ||||||||||||
AFS debt securities | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||
Prime | $ | 242 | $ | 12 | $ | 26 | $ | — | $ | 280 | |||||||
Alt-A | 1 | 1 | — | — | 2 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 2 | — | — | — | 2 | ||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 245 | $ | 13 | $ | 26 | $ | — | $ | 284 | |||||||
State and municipal | — | 3 | — | — | 3 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | — | 36 | — | — | 36 | ||||||||||||
Foreign government | 20 | 139 | — | — | 159 | ||||||||||||
Corporate | 137 | 5 | 5 | — | 147 | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 9 | — | — | — | 9 | ||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 49 | 3 | — | — | 52 | ||||||||||||
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities | $ | 460 | $ | 199 | $ | 31 | $ | — | $ | 690 | |||||||
HTM debt securities | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||
Prime | $ | 170 | $ | 126 | $ | 1 | $ | — | $ | 297 | |||||||
Alt-A | 2,569 | 309 | 8 | — | 2,886 | ||||||||||||
Subprime | 210 | 1 | 2 | — | 213 | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 96 | — | — | — | 96 | ||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | 9 | 1 | — | — | 10 | ||||||||||||
Total mortgage-backed securities | $ | 3,054 | $ | 437 | $ | 11 | $ | — | $ | 3,502 | |||||||
State and municipal | 7 | — | — | — | 7 | ||||||||||||
Corporate | 351 | — | — | — | 351 | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 48 | 41 | 19 | — | 108 | ||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 4 | — | 1 | — | 5 | ||||||||||||
Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities | $ | 3,464 | $ | 478 | $ | 31 | $ | — | $ | 3,973 | |||||||
TableInvestments in Alternative Investment Funds that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share
The Company holds investments in certain alternative investment funds that calculate net asset value (NAV) per share, including hedge funds, private equity funds, fund of Contentsfunds and real estate funds. The Company's investments include co-investments in funds that are managed by the Company and investments in funds that are managed by third parties. Investments in funds are generally classified as non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value.
The fair values of these investments are estimated using the NAV per share of the Company's ownership interest in the funds, where it is not probable that the Company will sell an investment at a price other than NAV.
In millions of dollars at June 30, 2010 | Fair value | Unfunded commitments | Redemption frequency (if currently eligible) | Redemption notice period | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hedge funds | $ | 1,044 | $ | 16 | Monthly, quarterly, annually | 10-95 days | |||||||
Private equity funds(1)(2) | 3,721 | 1,828 | — | — | |||||||||
Real estate funds(3) | 373 | 188 | — | — | |||||||||
Total | $ | 5,138 | (4) | $ | 2,032 | ||||||||
11. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
The changes in goodwill during the six months ended June 30, 2009 were as follows:
In millions of dollars | Goodwill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at December 31, 2008 | $ | 27,132 | ||
Foreign exchange translation | (844 | ) | ||
Purchase accounting adjustments and other | 122 | |||
Balance at March 31, 2009 | $ | 26,410 | ||
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture | (1,146 | ) | ||
Estimated impact from the Sale of Nikko Cordial Securities, reclassified asAssets of discontinued operations held for sale | (533 | ) | ||
Foreign exchange translation | 847 | |||
Balance at June 30, 2009 | $ | 25,578 | ||
Identification of New Reporting Units
The changes in the organizational structure resulted in the creation of new reporting segments. As a result, commencing with the second quarter 2009, the Company has identified new reporting units as required under SFAS 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill affected by during the reorganization has been reassigned from ten reporting units to nine, using a fair value approach. Subsequent to June 30, 2009, goodwill will be allocated to disposals and tested for impairment under the new reporting units.first six months of 2010 were as follows:
In millions of dollars | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Balance at December 31, 2009 | $ | 25,392 | ||
Foreign exchange translation | 294 | |||
Smaller acquisitions/divestitures, purchase accounting adjustments and other | (24 | ) | ||
Balance at March 31, 2010 | $ | 25,662 | ||
Foreign exchange translation | (442 | ) | ||
Smaller acquisitions/divestitures, purchase accounting adjustments and other | (19 | ) | ||
Balance at June 30, 2010 | $ | 25,201 | ||
During the first six months of 2009,2010, no goodwill was written off due to impairment.
While no Goodwill is tested for impairment was noted in step one ofannually during the Company'sthird quarter at the reporting unit level and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. During the second quarter, the Company reviewed the current conditions for all of its reporting units and determined that an interim goodwill impairment test goodwillwas required for the new Latin America Regional Consumer BankingitsBrokerage and Asset Management andLocal Consumer Lending—Cards reporting units. The valuations were updated for these particular businesses and the results of the review showed no goodwill impairment for these reporting units may be particularly sensitiveor any of the other reporting units as of June 30, 2010. Additionally, the fair value of theAsia Regional Consumer Banking,Securities and Banking andTransaction Services reporting units substantially exceeded their respective carrying value.
Citigroup engaged the services of an independent valuation specialist to further deteriorationassist in the updated valuation of itsLocal Consumer Lending—Cards reporting unit, which considered the impact of the recent penalty fee provision associated with the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act). The fair value as a percentage of allocated book value forLocal Consumer Lending—Cards andBrokerage and Asset Management is 115% and 105%, respectively. If economic conditions. Ifconditions deteriorate or other events adversely impact the future werebusiness models and the related assumptions including the discount rate, expected recovery, and expected loss rates used to differ adversely from management's best estimate of key economic assumptions and associated cash flows were to decrease by a small margin,value this reporting unit, the Company could potentially experience future material impairment charges with respect to the $1,265$4,593 million and $4,781$65 million of goodwill remaining in our Latin America Regional Consumer Banking and itsLocal Consumer Lending—Cards andBrokerage and Asset Management reporting units, respectively.units. Any such charges, by themselves, would not negatively affect the Company's Tier 1 Common, Tier 1 Common andCapital or Total Capital regulatory ratios, its Tangible Common Equity or the Company's liquidity position. The Company will continue to monitor these reporting units as the goodwill in these reporting units may be particularly sensitive to further deterioration in economic conditions.
The following tables present the Company's goodwill balances by reporting unit and by segment at June 30, 2009:2010:
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
By Reporting Unit | |||||
North America Regional Consumer Banking | $ | 2,406 | |||
EMEA Regional Consumer Banking | 306 | ||||
Asia Regional Consumer Banking | 5,392 | ||||
Latin America Regional Consumer Banking | 1,265 | ||||
Securities and Banking | 8,516 | ||||
Transaction Services | 1,561 | ||||
Brokerage and Asset Management | 1,299 | ||||
Local Consumer Lending—Cards | 4,781 | ||||
Local Consumer Lending—Other | 52 | ||||
Total | $ | 25,578 | |||
By Segment | |||||
Regional Consumer Banking | $ | 9,370 | |||
Institutional Clients Group | 10,077 | ||||
Citi Holdings | 6,131 | ||||
Total | $ | 25,578 | |||
In millions of dollars | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Reporting unit(1) | Goodwill | |||
North America Regional Consumer Banking | $ | 2,465 | ||
EMEA Regional Consumer Banking | 284 | |||
Asia Regional Consumer Banking | 5,638 | |||
Latin America Regional Consumer Banking | 1,683 | |||
Securities and Banking | 8,926 | |||
Transaction Services | 1,547 | |||
Brokerage and Asset Management | 65 | |||
Local Consumer Lending—Cards | 4,593 | |||
Total | $ | 25,201 | ||
By Segment | ||||
Regional Consumer Banking | $ | 10,070 | ||
Institutional Clients Group | 10,473 | |||
Citi Holdings | 4,658 | |||
Total | $ | 25,201 | ||
Intangible Assets
The components of intangible assets were as follows:
| June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Gross carrying amount | Accumulated amortization | Net carrying amount | Gross carrying amount | Accumulated amortization | Net carrying amount | |||||||||||||
Purchased credit card relationships | $ | 8,418 | $ | 4,748 | $ | 3,670 | $ | 8,443 | $ | 4,513 | $ | 3,930 | |||||||
Core deposit intangibles | 1,359 | 722 | 637 | 1,345 | 662 | 683 | |||||||||||||
Other customer relationships | 707 | 162 | 545 | 4,031 | 168 | 3,863 | |||||||||||||
Present value of future profits | 417 | 272 | 145 | 415 | 264 | 151 | |||||||||||||
Other(1) | 5,018 | 1,311 | 3,707 | 5,343 | 1,285 | 4,058 | |||||||||||||
Total amortizing intangible assets | $ | 15,919 | $ | 7,215 | $ | 8,704 | $ | 19,577 | $ | 6,892 | $ | 12,685 | |||||||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets | 1,394 | N/A | 1,394 | 1,474 | N/A | 1,474 | |||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights | 6,770 | N/A | 6,770 | 5,657 | N/A | 5,657 | |||||||||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | 24,083 | $ | 7,215 | $ | 16,868 | $ | 26,708 | $ | 6,892 | $ | 19,816 | |||||||
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Gross carrying amount | Accumulated amortization | Net carrying amount | Gross carrying amount | Accumulated amortization | Net carrying amount | |||||||||||||
Purchased credit card relationships | $ | 7,915 | $ | 4,950 | $ | 2,965 | $ | 8,148 | $ | 4,838 | $ | 3,310 | |||||||
Core deposit intangibles | 1,402 | 875 | 527 | 1,373 | 791 | 582 | |||||||||||||
Other customer relationships | 677 | 185 | 492 | 675 | 176 | 499 | |||||||||||||
Present value of future profits | 239 | 107 | 132 | 418 | 280 | 138 | |||||||||||||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets | 522 | — | 522 | 569 | — | 569 | |||||||||||||
Other(1) | 4,722 | 1,492 | 3,230 | 4,977 | 1,361 | 3,616 | |||||||||||||
Intangible assets (excluding MSRs) | $ | 15,477 | $ | 7,609 | $ | 7,868 | $ | 16,160 | $ | 7,446 | $ | 8,714 | |||||||
MSRs | 4,894 | — | 4,894 | 6,530 | — | 6,530 | |||||||||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | 20,371 | $ | 7,609 | $ | 12,762 | $ | 22,690 | $ | 7,446 | $ | 15,244 | |||||||
N/A Not Applicable.
The changes in intangible assets during the first six months ended June 30, 2009of 2010 were as follows:
In millions of dollars | Net carrying amount at December 31, 2008 | Acquisitions / Divestitures | Amortization | Impairments | FX and other(1) | Net carrying amount at June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Purchased credit card relationships | $ | 3,930 | $ | — | $ | (287 | ) | $ | — | $ | 27 | $ | 3,670 | ||||||
Core deposit intangibles | 683 | — | (58 | ) | (3 | ) | 15 | 637 | |||||||||||
Other customer relationships(2) | 3,863 | (3,016 | ) | (116 | ) | — | (186 | ) | 545 | ||||||||||
Present value of future profits | 151 | — | (7 | ) | — | 1 | 145 | ||||||||||||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets | 1,474 | (69 | ) | — | — | (11 | ) | 1,394 | |||||||||||
Other | 4,058 | (155 | ) | (149 | ) | (46 | ) | (1 | ) | 3,707 | |||||||||
$ | 14,159 | $ | (3,240 | ) | $ | (617 | ) | $ | (49 | ) | $ | (155 | ) | $ | 10,098 | ||||
Mortgage servicing rights(3) | 5,657 | 6,770 | |||||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | 19,816 | $ | 16,868 | |||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | Net carrying amount at December 31, 2009 | Acquisitions/ divestitures | Amortization | Impairments | FX and other(1) | Net carrying amount at June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Purchased credit card relationships | $ | 3,310 | $ | (53 | ) | $ | (251 | ) | $ | (39 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 2,965 | |||
Core deposit intangibles | 582 | — | (55 | ) | — | — | 527 | ||||||||||||
Other customer relationships | 499 | — | (27 | ) | — | 20 | 492 | ||||||||||||
Present value of future profits | 138 | — | (7 | ) | — | 1 | 132 | ||||||||||||
Indefinite-lived intangible assets | 569 | (46 | ) | — | — | (1 | ) | 522 | |||||||||||
Other | 3,616 | — | (158 | ) | (32 | ) | (196 | ) | 3,230 | ||||||||||
Intangible assets (excluding MSRs) | $ | 8,714 | $ | (99 | ) | $ | (498 | ) | $ | (71 | ) | $ | (178 | ) | $ | 7,868 | |||
MSRs(2) | 6,530 | 4,894 | |||||||||||||||||
Total intangible assets | $ | 15,244 | $ | 12,762 | |||||||||||||||
Table of Contents
12. DEBT
Short-Term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings consist of commercial paper and other borrowings as follows:
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commercial paper | |||||||
Citigroup Funding Inc. | $ | 27,862 | $ | 28,654 | |||
Other Citigroup subsidiaries | 633 | 471 | |||||
$ | 28,495 | $ | 29,125 | ||||
Other short-term borrowings | 73,399 | 97,566 | |||||
Total short-term borrowings | $ | 101,894 | $ | 126,691 | |||
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commercial paper | |||||||
Bank | $ | 25,170 | $ | — | |||
Other Non-bank | 11,193 | 10,223 | |||||
$ | 36,363 | $ | 10,223 | ||||
Other short-term borrowings(1) | 56,389 | 58,656 | |||||
Total short-term borrowings(2) | $ | 92,752 | $ | 68,879 | |||
Borrowings under bank lines of credit may be at interest rates based on LIBOR, CD rates, the prime rate or bids submitted by the banks. Citigroup pays commitment fees for its lines of credit.
Some of Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries have credit facilities with Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions, including Citibank, N.A. Borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act.
Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI) has committed financing with unaffiliated banks. At June 30, 2009, CGMHI had drawn down the full $1.175 billion available under these facilities, of which $725 million is guaranteed by Citigroup. CGMHI has bilateral facilities totaling $500 million with unaffiliated banks with maturities occurring on various dates in the second half of 2009. It also has substantial borrowing agreements consisting of facilities that CGMHI has been advised are available, but where no contractual lending obligation exists. These arrangements are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure flexibility in meeting CGMHI's short-term requirements.
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citigroup parent company | $ | 192,295 | $ | 192,290 | |||
Other Citigroup subsidiaries(1) | 96,497 | 109,306 | |||||
Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI) | 15,134 | 20,623 | |||||
Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI)(2) | 44,120 | 37,374 | |||||
Total long term debt | $ | 348,046 | $ | 359,593 | |||
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citigroup parent company | $ | 189,110 | $ | 197,804 | |||
Bank | 148,531 | 78,857 | |||||
Other Non-bank | 75,656 | 87,358 | |||||
Total long-term debt(1)(2)(3) | $ | 413,297 | $ | 364,019 | |||
CGMHI has a syndicated five-year committed uncollateralized revolving line of credit facility with unaffiliated banks totaling $3.0 billion, which was undrawn at
CGMHI also has committed long-term financing facilities with unaffiliated banks. At June 30, 2009,2010, CGMHI had drawn down the full $900 million available under these facilities, of which $350$150 million is guaranteed by Citigroup. Generally, a bank can terminate these facilities by giving CGMHI one-year prior notice.
The Company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies. It uses derivative contracts, primarily interest rate swaps, to effectively convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged. In addition, the Company uses other derivative contracts to manage the impact of FX translation on certain debt issuances.
Citigroup and other U.S. financial services firms are currently benefiting from government programs that are improving markets and providing Citigroup and other institutions with significant current funding capacity and significant liquidity support, including the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP). See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs" above.
Long-term debt at June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 20082009 includes $24.2$20.2 billion and $24.1$19.3 billion, respectively, of junior subordinated debt. The Company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of Delaware. The trusts exist for the exclusive purposes of (1) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trust; (2) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (subordinated debentures) of its parent; and (3) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto. Upon approval from the Federal Reserve Board, Citigroup has the right to redeem these securities.
Citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or purchase (i) the 6.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XV before September 15, 2056, (ii) the 6.45% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup
Capital XVI before December 31, 2046, (iii) the 6.35% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVII before March 15, 2057, (iv) the 6.829% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVIII before June 28, 2047, (v) the 7.250% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XIX before August 15, 2047, (vi) the 7.875% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XX before December 15, 2067, and (vii) the 8.300% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XXI before December 21, 2067, unless certain conditions, described in Exhibit 4.03 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2006, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 28, 2006, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 8, 2007, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2007, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2007, in Exhibit 4.2 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2007, and in Exhibit 4.2 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2007, respectively, are met. These agreements are for the benefit of the holders of Citigroup's 6.00% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2034. In addition, see Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Exchange Offers," below.
Citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts. These subsidiary trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts' common securities. These subsidiary trusts' obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.
The following table summarizes the financial structure of each of the Company's subsidiary trusts at June 30, 2009:2010:
| | | | | | Junior subordinated debentures owned by trust | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trust securities with distributions guaranteed by Citigroup In millions of dollars, except share amounts | Issuance date | Securities issued | Liquidation value | Coupon rate | Common shares issued to parent | Amount(1) | Maturity | Redeemable by issuer beginning | |||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital III | Dec. 1996 | 200,000 | $ | 200 | 7.625 | % | 6,186 | $ | 206 | Dec. 1, 2036 | Not redeemable | ||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital VII | July 2001 | 46,000,000 | 1,150 | 7.125 | % | 1,422,681 | 1,186 | July 31, 2031 | July 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital VIII | Sept. 2001 | 56,000,000 | 1,400 | 6.950 | % | 1,731,959 | 1,443 | Sept. 15, 2031 | Sept. 17, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital IX | Feb. 2003 | 44,000,000 | 1,100 | 6.000 | % | 1,360,825 | 1,134 | Feb. 14, 2033 | Feb. 13, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital X | Sept. 2003 | 20,000,000 | 500 | 6.100 | % | 618,557 | 515 | Sept. 30, 2033 | Sept. 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XI | Sept. 2004 | 24,000,000 | 600 | 6.000 | % | 742,269 | 619 | Sept. 27, 2034 | Sept. 27, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XIV | June 2006 | 22,600,000 | 565 | 6.875 | % | 40,000 | 566 | June 30, 2066 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XV | Sept. 2006 | 47,400,000 | 1,185 | 6.500 | % | 40,000 | 1,186 | Sept. 15, 2066 | Sept. 15, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XVI | Nov. 2006 | 64,000,000 | 1,600 | 6.450 | % | 20,000 | 1,601 | Dec. 31, 2066 | Dec. 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XVII | Mar. 2007 | 44,000,000 | 1,100 | 6.350 | % | 20,000 | 1,101 | Mar. 15, 2067 | Mar. 15, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XVIII | June 2007 | 500,000 | 824 | 6.829 | % | 50 | 824 | June 28, 2067 | June 28, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XIX | Aug. 2007 | 49,000,000 | 1,225 | 7.250 | % | 20 | 1,226 | Aug. 15, 2067 | Aug. 15, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XX | Nov. 2007 | 31,500,000 | 788 | 7.875 | % | 20,000 | 788 | Dec. 15, 2067 | Dec. 15, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XXI | Dec. 2007 | 3,500,000 | 3,500 | 8.300 | % | 500 | 3,501 | Dec. 21, 2077 | Dec. 21, 2037 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XXIX | Nov. 2007 | 1,875,000 | 1,875 | 6.320 | % | 10 | 1,875 | Mar. 15, 2041 | Mar. 15, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XXX | Nov. 2007 | 1,875,000 | 1,875 | 6.455 | % | 10 | 1,875 | Sept. 15, 2041 | Sept. 15, 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XXXI | Nov. 2007 | 1,875,000 | 1,875 | 6.700 | % | 10 | 1,875 | Mar. 15, 2042 | Mar. 15, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XXXII | Nov. 2007 | 1,875,000 | 1,875 | 6.935 | % | 10 | 1,875 | Sept. 15, 2042 | Sept. 15, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
Adam Capital Trust III | Dec. 2002 | 17,500 | 18 | 3 mo. LIB +335 bp. | 542 | 18 | Jan. 07, 2033 | Jan. 07, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
Adam Statutory Trust III | Dec. 2002 | 25,000 | 25 | 3 mo. LIB +325 bp. | 774 | 26 | Dec. 26, 2032 | Dec. 26, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||
Adam Statutory Trust IV | Sept. 2003 | 40,000 | 40 | 3 mo. LIB +295 bp. | 1,238 | 41 | Sept. 17, 2033 | Sept. 17, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
Adam Statutory Trust V | Mar. 2004 | 35,000 | 35 | 3 mo. LIB +279 bp. | 1,083 | 36 | Mar. 17, 2034 | Mar. 17, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Total obligated | $ | 23,355 | $ | 23,517 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | Junior subordinated debentures owned by trust | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trust securities with distributions guaranteed byCitigroup In millions of dollars, except share amounts | Issuance date | Securities issued | Liquidation value | Coupon rate | Common shares issued to parent | Amount(1) | Maturity | Redeemable by issuer beginning | |||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital III | Dec. 1996 | 194,053 | $ | 194 | 7.625 | % | 6,003 | $ | 200 | Dec. 1, 2036 | Not redeemable | ||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital VII | July 2001 | 35,885,898 | 897 | 7.125 | % | 1,109,874 | 925 | July 31, 2031 | July 31, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital VIII | Sept. 2001 | 43,651,597 | 1,091 | 6.950 | % | 1,350,050 | 1,125 | Sept. 15, 2031 | Sept. 17, 2006 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital IX | Feb. 2003 | 33,874,813 | 847 | 6.000 | % | 1,047,675 | �� | 873 | Feb. 14, 2033 | Feb. 13, 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital X | Sept. 2003 | 14,757,823 | 369 | 6.100 | % | 456,428 | 380 | Sept. 30, 2033 | Sept. 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XI | Sept. 2004 | 18,387,128 | 460 | 6.000 | % | 568,675 | 474 | Sept. 27, 2034 | Sept. 27, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XII | Mar. 2010 | 92,000,000 | 2,300 | 8.500 | % | 25 | 2,300 | Mar. 30, 2040 | Mar. 30, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XIV | June 2006 | 12,227,281 | 306 | 6.875 | % | 40,000 | 307 | June 30, 2066 | June 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XV | Sept. 2006 | 25,210,733 | 630 | 6.500 | % | 40,000 | 631 | Sept. 15, 2066 | Sept. 15, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XVI | Nov. 2006 | 38,148,947 | 954 | 6.450 | % | 20,000 | 954 | Dec. 31, 2066 | Dec. 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XVII | Mar. 2007 | 28,047,927 | 701 | 6.350 | % | 20,000 | 702 | Mar. 15, 2067 | Mar. 15, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XVIII | June 2007 | 99,901 | 150 | 6.829 | % | 50 | 150 | June 28, 2067 | June 28, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XIX | Aug. 2007 | 22,771,968 | 569 | 7.250 | % | 20,000 | 570 | Aug. 15, 2067 | Aug. 15, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XX | Nov. 2007 | 17,709,814 | 443 | 7.875 | % | 20,000 | 443 | Dec. 15, 2067 | Dec. 15, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XXI | Dec. 2007 | 2,345,801 | 2,346 | 8.300 | % | 500 | 2,346 | Dec. 21, 2077 | Dec. 21, 2037 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XXXI | Nov. 2007 | 1,875,000 | 1,875 | 6.700 | % | 10 | 1,875 | Mar. 15, 2042 | Mar. 15, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XXXII | Nov. 2007 | 1,875,000 | 1,875 | 6.935 | % | 10 | 1,875 | Sept. 15, 2042 | Sept. 15, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
Citigroup Capital XXXIII | July 2009 | 5,259,000 | 5,259 | 8.000 | % | 100 | 5,259 | July 30, 2039 | July 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
Adam Capital Trust III | Dec. 2002 | 17,500 | 18 | 3 mo. LIB +335 bp. | 542 | 18 | Jan. 7, 2033 | Jan. 7, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
Adam Statutory Trust III | Dec. 2002 | 25,000 | 25 | 3 mo. LIB +325 bp. | 774 | 26 | Dec. 26, 2032 | Dec. 26, 2007 | |||||||||||||||||
Adam Statutory Trust IV | Sept. 2003 | 40,000 | 40 | 3 mo. LIB +295 bp. | 1,238 | 41 | Sept. 17, 2033 | Sept. 17, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||
Adam Statutory Trust V | Mar. 2004 | 35,000 | 35 | 3 mo. LIB +279 bp. | 1,083 | 36 | Mar. 17, 2034 | Mar. 17, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Total obligated | $ | 21,384 | $ | 21,510 | |||||||||||||||||||||
In each case, the coupon rate on the debentures is the same as that on the trust securities. Distributions on the trust securities and interest on the debentures are payable quarterly, except for Citigroup Capital III, Citigroup Capital XVIII and Citigroup Capital XXI, on which distributions are payable semiannually.
During the second quarter of 2009,2010 Citigroup did not issue any trust preferred securities. In addition, see Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements,"Exchange Offers," below.exchanged Citigroup Capital Trust XXX for $1.875 billion of senior notes with a coupon of 6% payable semi-annually. The senior notes mature on December 13, 2013.
13. PREFERRED STOCK
The following table summarizes the Company's preferred stock outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
| | | | | Carrying value (in millions of dollars) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | Convertible to approximate number of Citigroup common shares | |||||||||||||||
| | Redemption price per depositary share / preference share | | ||||||||||||||||
| Dividend rate | Number of depositary shares | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||
Series A1(1) | 7.000 | % | $ | 50 | 137,600,000 | 261,083,726 | $ | 6,880 | $ | 6,880 | |||||||||
Series B1(1) | 7.000 | % | 50 | 60,000,000 | 113,844,648 | 3,000 | 3,000 | ||||||||||||
Series C1(1) | 7.000 | % | 50 | 20,000,000 | 37,948,216 | 1,000 | 1,000 | ||||||||||||
Series D1(1) | 7.000 | % | 50 | 15,000,000 | 28,461,162 | 750 | 750 | ||||||||||||
Series E(2) | 8.400 | % | 1,000 | 6,000,000 | — | 6,000 | 6,000 | ||||||||||||
Series F(3) | 8.500 | % | 25 | 81,600,000 | — | 2,040 | 2,040 | ||||||||||||
Series G(4) | 8.000 | % | 1,000,000 | 7,059 | — | 3,529 | — | ||||||||||||
Series H(5) | 5.000 | % | 1,000,000 | 25,000 | — | 23,835 | 23,727 | ||||||||||||
Series I(6) | 8.000 | % | 1,000,000 | 20,000 | — | 19,513 | 19,513 | ||||||||||||
Series J1(1) | 7.000 | % | 50 | 9,000,000 | 17,076,698 | 450 | 450 | ||||||||||||
Series K1(1) | 7.000 | % | 50 | 8,000,000 | 15,179,287 | 400 | 400 | ||||||||||||
Series L2(1) | 7.000 | % | 50 | 100,000 | 189,742 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Series N1(1) | 7.000 | % | 50 | 300,000 | 569,224 | 15 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Series T(7) | 6.500 | % | 50 | 63,373,000 | 93,940,986 | 3,169 | 3,169 | ||||||||||||
Series AA(8) | 8.125 | % | 25 | 148,600,000 | — | 3,715 | 3,715 | ||||||||||||
568,293,689 | $ | 74,301 | $ | 70,664 | |||||||||||||||
If dividends were to be declared on Series E as scheduled, the impact from preferred dividends on earnings per share in the first and third quarters will be lower than the impact in the second and fourth quarters. All other series have a quarterly dividend declaration schedule. As previously announced, following the closing of the public exchange offers, Citigroup suspended payment of dividends on all remaining outstanding preferred securities.
Other than securities containing customary anti-dilution provisions, Citigroup's only outstanding instruments subject to potential resets are the warrant to purchase 210,084,034 shares of common stock issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of TARP on November 28, 2008, the warrant to purchase 188,501,414 shares of common stock issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of
TARP on December 31, 2008, and the warrant to purchase 66,531,728 shares of common stock issued to the U.S. Treasury as consideration for the loss-sharing agreement on January 15, 2009. Under the terms of the warrants, the number of shares of common stock for which the warrants are exercisable and the exercise price of the warrants will be subject to a reset if, prior to the third anniversary of issue date of the warrants, Citigroup issues shares of common stock (or rights or warrants or other securities exercisable or convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock) (collectively, "convertible securities") without consideration or at a consideration per share (or having a conversion price per share) that is less than 90% of the market price of Citigroup's common stock on the last trading day preceding the date of the agreement on pricing such shares (or such convertible securities), subject to specified exceptions.
In addition, see Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements,"Exchange Offers," below.
14.13. CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
ChangesThe following table shows the changes in each component of Accumulated"Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (AOCI)" for the first and second quarters of 2009 were as follows:2010:
In millions of dollars | Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities | Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of hedges | Cash flow hedges | Pension liability adjustments | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance, December 31, 2008 | $ | (9,647 | ) | $ | (7,744 | ) | $ | (5,189 | ) | $ | (2,615 | ) | $ | (25,195 | ) | |
Cumulative effect of accounting change (FSP FAS 115-2 /ASC 320-10-65-1) | (413 | ) | — | — | — | (413 | ) | |||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2009 | $ | (10,060 | ) | $ | (7,744 | ) | $ | (5,189 | ) | $ | (2,615 | ) | $ | (25,608 | ) | |
Decrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)(3) | 31 | — | — | — | 31 | |||||||||||
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes | (11 | ) | — | — | — | (11 | ) | |||||||||
FX translation adjustment, net of taxes(2) | — | (2,974 | ) | — | — | (2,974 | ) | |||||||||
Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3) | — | — | 1,483 | — | 1,483 | |||||||||||
Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes | — | — | — | 66 | 66 | |||||||||||
Change | $ | 20 | $ | (2,974 | ) | $ | 1,483 | $ | 66 | $ | (1,405 | ) | ||||
Citigroup Stockholders AOCI balance, March 31, 2009 | $ | (10,040 | ) | $ | (10,718 | ) | $ | (3,706 | ) | $ | (2,549 | ) | $ | (27,013 | ) | |
Decrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)(3) | 2,890 | — | — | — | 2,890 | |||||||||||
Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes | 95 | — | — | — | 95 | |||||||||||
FX translation adjustment, net of taxes(4) | — | 2,406 | — | — | 2,406 | |||||||||||
Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3) | — | — | 41 | — | 41 | |||||||||||
Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes | — | — | — | (62 | ) | (62 | ) | |||||||||
Change | $ | 2,985 | $ | 2,406 | $ | 41 | $ | (62 | ) | $ | 5,370 | |||||
Citigroup Stockholders AOCI balance, June 30, 2009 | $ | (7,055 | ) | $ | (8,312 | ) | $ | (3,665 | ) | $ | (2,611 | ) | $ | (21,643 | ) | |
In millions of dollars | Net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities | Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of hedges | Cash flow hedges | Pension liability adjustments | Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Balance, December 31, 2009 | $ | (4,347 | ) | $ | (7,947 | ) | $ | (3,182 | ) | $ | (3,461 | ) | $ | (18,937 | ) | |
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes | 1,210 | — | — | — | 1,210 | |||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income, net of taxes | (28 | ) | — | — | — | (28 | ) | |||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes(1) | — | (279 | ) | — | — | (279 | ) | |||||||||
Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(2) | — | — | 223 | — | 223 | |||||||||||
Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes(3) | — | — | — | (48 | ) | (48 | ) | |||||||||
Change | $ | 1,182 | $ | (279 | ) | $ | 223 | $ | (48 | ) | $ | 1,078 | ||||
Balance, March 31, 2010 | $ | (3,165 | ) | $ | (8,226 | ) | $ | (2,959 | ) | $ | (3,509 | ) | $ | (17,859 | ) | |
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(4) | 967 | — | — | — | 967 | |||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income, net of taxes | (61 | ) | — | — | — | (61 | ) | |||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes(1) | — | (2,036 | ) | — | — | (2,036 | ) | |||||||||
Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(2) | — | — | (225 | ) | — | (225 | ) | |||||||||
Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes(3) | — | — | — | 44 | 44 | |||||||||||
Change | $ | 906 | $ | (2,036 | ) | $ | (225 | ) | $ | 44 | $ | (1,311 | ) | |||
Balance, June 30, 2010 | $ | (2,259 | ) | $ | (10,262 | ) | $ | (3,184 | ) | $ | (3,465 | ) | $ | (19,170 | ) | |
15.14. SECURITIZATIONS AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
Overview
Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs). See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of impending accounting changes to SFAS 140,Accountingthe accounting for Transferstransfers and Servicingservicing of Financial Assetsfinancial assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities (SFAS 140 /ASC 860), and FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidationconsolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003) (FIN 46 (R)/ASC 810-10)(VIEs), including the elimination of Qualifying SPEs (QSPEs)."
Uses of SPEs
An SPE is an entity designed to fulfill a specific limited need of the company that organized it.
The principal uses of SPEs are to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroup's financial assets, to assist clients in securitizing their financial assets, and to create investment products for clients. SPEs may be organized in many legal forms including trusts, partnerships or corporations. In a securitization, the company transferring assets to an SPE converts all (or a portion) of those assets into cash before they would have been realized in the normal course of business, through the SPE's issuance of debt and equity instruments, certificates, commercial paper and other notes of indebtedness, which are recorded on the balance sheet of the SPE and not reflected onin the transferring company's balance sheet, assuming applicable accounting requirements are satisfied. Investors usually have recourse to the assets in the SPE and often benefit from other credit enhancements, such as a collateral account or over collateralizationover-collateralization in the form of excess assets in the SPE, a line of credit, or from a liquidity facility, such as a line of credit, liquidity put option or asset purchase agreement. The SPE can typically obtain a more favorable credit rating from rating agencies than the transferor could obtain for its own debt issuances, resulting in less expensive financing costs.costs than unsecured debt. The SPE may also enter into derivative contracts in order to convert the yield or currency of the underlying assets to match the needs of the SPE investors or to limit or change the credit risk of the SPE. Citigroup may be the provider of certain credit enhancements as well as the counterparty to any related derivative contracts.
Since QSPEs were eliminated, most of Citigroup's SPEs may be Qualifying SPEs (QSPEs) or Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) or neither.
Qualifying SPEs
QSPEs are a special class of SPEs defined in SFAS 140 /ASC 860-40-15. QSPEs have significant limitations on the types of assets and derivative instruments they may own or enter into and the types and extent of activities and decision-making they may engage in. Generally, QSPEs are passive entities designed to purchase assets and pass through the cash flows from those assets to the investors in the QSPE. QSPEs may not actively manage their assets through discretionary sales and are generally limited to making decisions inherent in servicing activities and issuance of liabilities. QSPEs are generally exempt from consolidation by the transferor of assets to the QSPE and any investor or counterparty.now VIEs.
Variable Interest Entities
VIEs are entities defined in FIN 46(R)/ASC 810-10-15, as entities that have either a total equity investment that is insufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest (i.e., ability to make significant decisions through voting rights, and right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity andor obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity). Investors that finance the VIE through debt or equity interests or other counterparties that provide other forms of support, such as guarantees, subordinated fee arrangements, or certain types of derivative contracts, are variable interest holders in the entity. TheSince January 1, 2010, the variable interest holder, if any, that willhas a controlling financial interest in a VIE is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE. Citigroup would be deemed to have a controlling financial interest if it has both of the following characteristics:
The Company must evaluate its involvement in each VIE and understand the purpose and design of the entity, the role the Company had in the entity's design, and its involvement in its ongoing activities. The Company then must evaluate which activities most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and who has the power to direct such activities.
For those VIEs where the Company determines that it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, the Company then must evaluate its economic interests, if any, and determine whether it could absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. When evaluating whether the Company has an obligation to absorb losses that could potentially be significant, it considers the maximum exposure to such loss without consideration of probability. Such obligations could be in various forms, including but not limited to, debt and equity investments, guarantees, liquidity agreements, and certain derivative contracts.
Prior to January 1, 2010, the variable interest holder, if any, that would absorb a majority of the entity's expected losses, receive a majority of the entity's expected residual returns or both iswas deemed to be the primary beneficiary and must consolidateconsolidated the VIE. Consolidation of athe VIE iswas determined based primarily on the variability generated in scenarios that are considered most likely to occur, rather than based on scenarios that are considered more remote. Certain variable interests may absorb significant amounts of losses or residual returns contractually, but if those scenarios are considered very unlikely to occur, they may not lead to consolidation of the VIE.
All of these facts and circumstances are taken into consideration when determining whether the Company has variable interests that would deem it the primary beneficiary and, therefore, require consolidation of the related VIE or otherwise rise to the level where disclosure would provide useful information to the users of the Company's financial statements. In some cases, it is qualitatively clear based on the extent of the Company's involvement or the seniority of its investments that the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE. In othermany cases, a more detailed and quantitative analysis iswas required to make such athis determination.
The Company generally considers the following types of involvement to be significant:
In various other transactions, the Company may act as a derivative counterparty (for example, interest rate swap, cross-currency swap, or purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Company pays the total return on certain assets to the SPE); may act as underwriter or placement agent; may provide administrative, trustee, or other services; or may make a market in debt securities or other instruments issued by VIEs. The Company generally considers such involvement, by itself, "not significant" under FIN 46(R)/ASC 810-10-25.not to be variable interests and thus not an indicator of power or potentially significant benefits or losses.
Citigroup's involvement with QSPEs, Consolidatedconsolidated and Unconsolidatedunconsolidated VIEs with which the Company holds significant variable interests as of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 20082009 is presented below:
As of June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs(1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | Funded exposures(3) | Unfunded exposures(4) | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | Total involvement with SPE assets | QSPE assets | Consolidated VIE assets | Significant unconsolidated VIE assets(2) | Debt investments | Equity investments | Funding commitments | Guarantees and derivatives | |||||||||||||||||
Citicorp | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit card securitizations | $ | 77,382 | $ | 77,382 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) | 29,884 | — | — | 29,884 | 178 | — | 29,706 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Third-party commercial paper conduits | 9,623 | — | — | 9,623 | — | — | 562 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||
Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) | 3,495 | — | — | 3,495 | 12 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) | 4,801 | — | — | 4,801 | 187 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loan securitization | 85,072 | 85,072 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Asset-based financing | 15,260 | — | 1,522 | 13,738 | 3,275 | 45 | 410 | 149 | |||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs) | 26,271 | 759 | 16,484 | 9,028 | 48 | — | 6,543 | 558 | |||||||||||||||||
Municipal investments | 591 | — | — | 591 | — | 34 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Client intermediation | 8,211 | — | 2,754 | 5,457 | 1,202 | 22 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Investment funds | 124 | — | 34 | 90 | 14 | — | — | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
Trust preferred securities | 24,034 | — | — | 24,034 | — | 161 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Other | 9,703 | 3,537 | 1,903 | 4,263 | 352 | 4 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 294,451 | $ | 166,750 | $ | 22,697 | $ | 105,004 | $ | 5,268 | $ | 266 | $ | 37,221 | $ | 729 | |||||||||
Citi Holdings | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit card securitizations | $ | 42,566 | $ | 42,566 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Mortgage securitizations | 521,830 | 521,830 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Student loan securitizations | 15,042 | 15,042 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) | 14,809 | — | 237 | 14,572 | — | — | 14,180 | 392 | |||||||||||||||||
Third-party commercial paper conduits | 6,112 | — | — | 6,112 | 301 | — | 169 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) | 20,619 | — | 8,170 | 12,449 | 651 | — | — | 524 | |||||||||||||||||
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) | 15,983 | — | 72 | 15,911 | 1,602 | — | 12 | 247 | |||||||||||||||||
Asset-based financing | 58,948 | — | 475 | 58,473 | 17,179 | 68 | 1,543 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs) | 2,260 | — | 2,260 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Municipal investments | 16,824 | — | 879 | 15,945 | — | 2,005 | 611 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Client intermediation | 639 | — | 280 | 359 | 27 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Investment funds | 9,392 | — | 1,248 | 8,144 | — | 143 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Other | 5,360 | 777 | 3,137 | 1,446 | 227 | 122 | 269 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 730,384 | $ | 580,215 | $ | 16,758 | $ | 133,411 | $ | 19,987 | $ | 2,338 | $ | 16,784 | $ | 1,163 | |||||||||
Total Citigroup | $ | 1,024,835 | $ | 746,965 | $ | 39,455 | $ | 238,415 | $ | 25,255 | $ | 2,604 | $ | 54,005 | $ | 1,892 | |||||||||
As of June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs(1) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | Funded exposures(2) | Unfunded exposures(3) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total involvement with SPE assets | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | Consolidated VIE / SPE assets(4) | Significant unconsolidated VIE assets(4)(5) | Debt investments | Equity investments | Funding commitments | Guarantees and derivatives | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Citicorp | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit card securitizations | $ | 64,560 | $ | 64,560 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Mortgage securitizations(6) | 175,625 | 2,100 | 173,525 | 1,937 | — | — | 30 | 1,967 | |||||||||||||||||
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) | 29,066 | 21,483 | 7,583 | — | — | 7,583 | — | 7,583 | |||||||||||||||||
Third-party commercial paper conduits | 4,275 | — | 4,275 | 259 | — | 342 | — | 601 | |||||||||||||||||
Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) | 5,762 | — | 5,762 | 132 | — | — | — | 132 | |||||||||||||||||
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) | 7,392 | — | 7,392 | 86 | — | — | — | 86 | |||||||||||||||||
Asset-based financing | 26,037 | 1,218 | 24,819 | 7,362 | 12 | 1,144 | 13 | 8,531 | |||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs) | 19,761 | 10,306 | 9,455 | — | — | 6,408 | 588 | 6,996 | |||||||||||||||||
Municipal investments | 12,673 | 241 | 12,432 | 750 | 2,409 | 545 | — | 3,704 | |||||||||||||||||
Client intermediation | 6,280 | 1,170 | 5,110 | 1,583 | 8 | — | — | 1,591 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment funds | 3,479 | 124 | 3,355 | 2 | 48 | — | — | 50 | |||||||||||||||||
Trust preferred securities | 21,627 | — | 21,627 | — | 128 | — | — | 128 | |||||||||||||||||
Other | 5,625 | 863 | 4,762 | 759 | — | 119 | 241 | 1,119 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 382,162 | $ | 102,065 | $ | 280,097 | $ | 12,870 | $ | 2,605 | $ | 16,141 | $ | 872 | $ | 32,488 | |||||||||
Citi Holdings | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit card securitizations | $ | 35,511 | $ | 35,511 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Mortgage securitizations(6) | 278,462 | 3,719 | 274,743 | 2,777 | — | — | 119 | 2,896 | |||||||||||||||||
Student loan securitizations | 35,081 | 35,081 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Auto loan securitizations | 2,196 | 2,196 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) | 100 | 100 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Third-party commercial paper conduits | 3,282 | — | 3,282 | — | — | 252 | — | 252 | |||||||||||||||||
Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) | 9,372 | 709 | 8,663 | 389 | — | — | 143 | 532 | |||||||||||||||||
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) | 14,209 | 490 | 13,719 | 1,503 | — | 59 | 371 | 1,933 | |||||||||||||||||
Asset-based financing | 46,634 | 3 | 46,631 | 14,680 | 4 | 925 | — | 15,609 | |||||||||||||||||
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs) | 631 | 631 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Municipal investments | 4,638 | — | 4,638 | 124 | 195 | 124 | — | 443 | |||||||||||||||||
Client intermediation | 696 | 215 | 481 | 62 | — | — | 347 | 409 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment funds | 4,731 | 1,138 | 3,593 | — | 83 | 403 | — | 486 | |||||||||||||||||
Other | 2,166 | 483 | 1,683 | 215 | 118 | 181 | — | 514 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 437,709 | $ | 80,276 | $ | 357,433 | $ | 19,750 | $ | 400 | $ | 1,944 | $ | 980 | $ | 23,074 | |||||||||
Total Citigroup | $ | 819,871 | $ | 182,341 | $ | 637,530 | $ | 32,620 | $ | 3,005 | $ | 18,085 | $ | 1,852 | $ | 55,562 | |||||||||
As of June 30, 2009 (continued) | As of December 31, 2008(1) In millions of dollars | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs (continued)(3) | Total involvement with SPEs | QSPE assets | Consolidated VIE assets | Significant unconsolidated VIE assets(2) | Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIE assets(3) | |||||||||||||
$ | — | $ | 78,254 | $ | 78,254 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
29,884 | 36,108 | — | — | 36,108 | 36,108 | |||||||||||||
582 | 10,589 | — | — | 10,589 | 579 | |||||||||||||
12 | 4,042 | — | — | 4,042 | 12 | |||||||||||||
187 | 3,343 | — | — | 3,343 | 2 | |||||||||||||
— | 84,953 | 84,953 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
3,879 | 16,930 | — | 1,629 | 15,301 | 4,556 | |||||||||||||
7,149 | 27,047 | 5,964 | 12,135 | 8,948 | 7,884 | |||||||||||||
34 | 593 | — | — | 593 | 35 | |||||||||||||
1,224 | 8,332 | — | 3,480 | 4,852 | 1,476 | |||||||||||||
16 | 71 | — | 45 | 26 | 31 | |||||||||||||
161 | 23,899 | — | — | 23,899 | 162 | |||||||||||||
356 | 10,394 | 3,737 | 2,419 | 4,238 | 370 | |||||||||||||
$ | 43,484 | $ | 304,555 | $ | 172,908 | $ | 19,708 | $ | 111,939 | $ | 51,215 | |||||||
$ | — | $ | 45,613 | $ | 45,613 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
— | 586,410 | 586,407 | 3 | — | — | |||||||||||||
— | 15,650 | 15,650 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||
14,572 | 23,527 | — | — | 23,527 | 23,527 | |||||||||||||
470 | 10,166 | — | — | 10,166 | 820 | |||||||||||||
1,175 | 26,018 | — | 11,466 | 14,552 | 1,461 | |||||||||||||
1,861 | 19,610 | — | 122 | 19,488 | 1,680 | |||||||||||||
18,790 | 85,224 | — | 2,218 | 83,006 | 23,676 | |||||||||||||
— | 3,024 | 540 | 2,484 | — | — | |||||||||||||
2,616 | 16,545 | — | 866 | 15,679 | 2,915 | |||||||||||||
27 | 1,132 | — | 331 | 801 | 61 | |||||||||||||
143 | 10,330 | — | 2,084 | 8,246 | 158 | |||||||||||||
618 | 9,472 | 1,014 | 4,306 | 4,152 | 892 | |||||||||||||
$ | 40,272 | $ | 852,721 | $ | 649,224 | $ | 23,880 | $ | 179,617 | $ | 55,190 | |||||||
$ | 83,756 | $ | 1,157,276 | $ | 822,132 | $ | 43,588 | $ | 291,556 | $ | 106,405 | |||||||
| | | | As of December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Total involvement with SPE assets | QSPE assets | Consolidated VIE assets | Significant unconsolidated VIE assets(1) | Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs(2) | |||||||||||
Citicorp | ||||||||||||||||
Credit card securitizations | $ | 78,833 | $ | 78,833 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Mortgage securitizations | 264,949 | 264,949 | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) | 36,327 | — | — | 36,327 | 36,326 | |||||||||||
Third-party commercial paper conduits | 3,718 | — | — | 3,718 | 353 | |||||||||||
Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) | 2,785 | — | — | 2,785 | 21 | |||||||||||
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) | 5,409 | — | — | 5,409 | 120 | |||||||||||
Asset-based financing | 19,612 | — | 1,279 | 18,333 | 5,221 | |||||||||||
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs) | 19,455 | 705 | 9,623 | 9,127 | 6,841 | |||||||||||
Municipal investments | 10,906 | — | 11 | 10,895 | 2,370 | |||||||||||
Client intermediation | 8,607 | — | 2,749 | 5,858 | 881 | |||||||||||
Investment funds | 93 | — | 39 | 54 | 10 | |||||||||||
Trust preferred securities | 19,345 | — | — | 19,345 | 128 | |||||||||||
Other | 7,380 | 1,808 | 1,838 | 3,734 | 446 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 477,419 | $ | 346,295 | $ | 15,539 | $ | 115,585 | $ | 52,717 | ||||||
Citi Holdings | ||||||||||||||||
Credit card securitizations | $ | 42,274 | $ | 42,274 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Mortgage securitizations | 308,504 | 308,504 | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Student loan securitizations | 14,343 | 14,343 | — | — | — | |||||||||||
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) | 98 | — | 98 | — | — | |||||||||||
Third-party commercial paper conduits | 5,776 | — | — | 5,776 | 439 | |||||||||||
Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) | 24,157 | — | 7,614 | 16,543 | 1,158 | |||||||||||
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) | 13,515 | — | 142 | 13,373 | 1,658 | |||||||||||
Asset-based financing | 52,598 | — | 370 | 52,228 | 18,385 | |||||||||||
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs) | 1,999 | — | 1,999 | — | — | |||||||||||
Municipal investments | 5,364 | — | 882 | 4,482 | 375 | |||||||||||
Client intermediation | 675 | — | 230 | 445 | 396 | |||||||||||
Investment funds | 10,178 | — | 1,037 | 9,141 | 268 | |||||||||||
Other | 3,732 | 610 | 1,472 | 1,650 | 604 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 483,213 | $ | 365,731 | $ | 13,844 | $ | 103,638 | $ | 23,283 | ||||||
Total Citigroup | $ | 960,632 | $ | 712,026 | $ | 29,383 | $ | 219,223 | $ | 76,000 | ||||||
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.
This The previous table does not include:
Prior to January 1, 2010, the table did not include:
The asset balances for consolidated VIEs represent the carrying amounts of the assets consolidated by the Company. The carrying amount may represent the amortized cost or the current fair value of the assets depending on the legal form of the asset (e.g., security or loan) and the Company's standard accounting policies for the asset type and line of business.
The asset balances for unconsolidated VIEs where the Company has significant involvement represent the most current information available to the Company. In most cases, the asset balances represent an amortized cost basis without regard to impairments in fair value, unless fair value information is readily available to the Company. For VIEs that obtain asset exposures synthetically through derivative instruments (for example, synthetic CDOs), the table includes the full original notional amount of the derivative as an asset.
The maximum funded exposure represents the balance sheet carrying amount of the Company's investment in the VIE. It reflects the initial amount of cash invested in the VIE plus any accrued interest and is adjusted for any impairments in value recognized in earnings and any cash principal payments received. The maximum exposure of unfunded positions represents the remaining undrawn committed amount, including liquidity and credit facilities provided by the Company, or the notional amount of a derivative instrument considered to be a variable interest, adjusted for any declines in fair value recognized in earnings. In certain transactions, the Company has entered into derivative instruments or other arrangements that are not considered variable interests in the VIE under FIN 46(R)/ASC 810-10-15 (e.g., interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps, or where the Company is the purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Company pays the total return on certain assets to the SPE). Receivables under such arrangements are not included in the maximum exposure amounts.
Funding Commitments for Significant Unconsolidated VIEs—Liquidity Facilities and Loan Commitments
The following table presents the notional amount of liquidity facilities and loan commitments that are classified as funding commitments in the SPE table as of June 30, 2009:2010:
In billions of dollars | Liquidity Facilities | Loan Commitments | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citicorp | |||||||
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) | $ | 25,506 | $ | 4,200 | |||
Third-party commercial paper conduits | 552 | 10 | |||||
Asset-based financing | — | 410 | |||||
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs) | 6,543 | — | |||||
Total Citicorp | $ | 32,601 | $ | 4,620 | |||
Citi Holdings | |||||||
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) | $ | 14,180 | $ | — | |||
Third-party commercial paper conduits | 169 | — | |||||
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) | — | 12 | |||||
Asset-based financing | — | 1,543 | |||||
Municipal investments | — | 611 | |||||
Other | — | 269 | |||||
Total Citi Holdings | $ | 14,349 | $ | 2,435 | |||
Total Citigroup funding commitments | $ | 46,950 | $ | 7,055 | |||
In millions of dollars | Liquidity Facilities | Loan Commitments | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Citicorp | |||||||
Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP) | $ | 7,583 | $ | — | |||
Third-party commercial paper conduits | 342 | — | |||||
Asset-based financing | 5 | 1,139 | |||||
Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs) | 6,408 | — | |||||
Municipal investments | — | 545 | |||||
Other | — | 119 | |||||
Total Citicorp | $ | 14,338 | $ | 1,803 | |||
Citi Holdings | |||||||
Third-party commercial paper conduits | $ | 252 | $ | — | |||
Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) | — | 59 | |||||
Asset-based financing | — | 925 | |||||
Municipal investments | — | 124 | |||||
Investment Funds | 15 | 388 | |||||
Other | — | 181 | |||||
Total Citi Holdings | $ | 267 | $ | 1,677 | |||
Total Citigroup funding commitments | $ | 14,605 | $ | 3,480 | |||
Citicorp'sCiticorp & Citi Holdings Consolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet ClassificationVIEs
The following table presents the carrying amounts and classifications of consolidated assets that are collateral for consolidated VIE obligations:and SPE obligations.
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $ | 0.4 | $ | 0.7 | |||
Trading account assets | 3.0 | 4.3 | |||||
Investments | 17.0 | 12.5 | |||||
Loans | 0.2 | 0.5 | |||||
Other assets | 2.1 | 1.7 | |||||
Total assets of consolidated VIEs | $ | 22.7 | $ | 19.7 | |||
The following table presentsCompany engages in on-balance-sheet securitizations which are securitizations that do not qualify for sales treatment; thus, the carrying amounts and classification ofassets remain on the third-party liabilities of the consolidated VIEs:
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Short-term borrowings | $ | 16.8 | $ | 14.2 | |||
Long-term debt | 5.7 | 5.6 | |||||
Other liabilities | 0.2 | 0.9 | |||||
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs | $ | 22.7 | $ | 20.7 | |||
Company's balance sheet. The consolidated VIEs included in the table abovetables below represent hundreds of separate entities with which the Company is involved. In general, the third-party investors in the obligations of consolidated VIEs have legal recourse only to the assets of the VIEs and do not have such recourse to the Company, except where the Company has provided a guarantee to the investors or is the counterparty to certain derivative transactions involving the VIE. In addition, the assets are generally restricted only to pay such liabilities. Thus, the Company's maximum legal exposure to loss related to consolidated VIEs is significantly less than the carrying value of the consolidated VIE assets due to outstanding third-party financing. Intercompany assets and liabilities are excluded from the table.
Citi Holdings' Consolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification
All assets are restricted from being sold or pledged as collateral. The following table presentscash flows from these assets are the carrying amounts and classifications of consolidated assets thatonly source used to pay down the associated liabilities, which are collateral for consolidated VIE obligations:non-recourse to the Company's general assets.
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $ | 0.7 | $ | 1.2 | |||
Trading account assets | 10.5 | 16.6 | |||||
Investments | 3.1 | 3.3 | |||||
Loans | 1.8 | 2.1 | |||||
Other assets | 0.7 | 0.7 | |||||
Total assets of consolidated VIEs | $ | 16.8 | $ | 23.9 | |||
The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of the third-party liabilities of the consolidated VIEs:
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trading account liabilities | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.5 | |||
Short-term borrowings | 2.9 | 2.8 | |||||
Long-term debt | 0.5 | 1.2 | |||||
Other liabilities | 1.2 | 2.1 | |||||
Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs | $ | 4.8 | $ | 6.6 | |||
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Citicorp | Citi Holdings | Citigroup | Citicorp | Citi Holdings | Citigroup | |||||||||||||
Cash | $ | 0.8 | $ | 1.9 | $ | 2.7 | $ | — | $ | 1.4 | $ | 1.4 | |||||||
Trading account assets | 2.1 | 2.1 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 9.5 | 13.2 | |||||||||||||
Investments | 10.5 | 0.7 | 11.2 | 9.8 | 2.8 | 12.6 | |||||||||||||
Total loans, net | 86.8 | 72.4 | 159.2 | 0.1 | 25.0 | 25.1 | |||||||||||||
Other | 1.8 | 3.2 | 5.0 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 3.2 | |||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 102.0 | $ | 80.3 | $ | 182.3 | $ | 15.5 | $ | 40.0 | $ | 55.5 | |||||||
Short-term borrowings | $ | 35.0 | $ | 2.3 | $ | 37.3 | $ | 9.5 | $ | 2.6 | $ | 12.1 | |||||||
Long-term debt | 49.7 | 51.3 | 101.0 | 4.6 | 21.2 | 25.8 | |||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 1.7 | 3.0 | 4.7 | 0.1 | 3.6 | 3.7 | |||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 86.4 | $ | 56.6 | $ | 143.0 | $ | 14.2 | $ | 27.4 | $ | 41.6 | |||||||
Citicorp'sCiticorp & Citi Holdings Significant Interests in Unconsolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification
The following table presentstables present the carrying amounts and classification of significant interests in unconsolidated VIEs:
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trading account assets | $ | 1.2 | $ | 1.9 | |||
Investments | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||||
Loans | 3.4 | 3.5 | |||||
Other assets | 0.6 | 0.4 | |||||
Total assets of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs | $ | 5.4 | $ | 6.0 | |||
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Long-term debt | $ | 0.5 | $ | 0.4 | |||
Total liabilities of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs | $ | 0.5 | $ | 0.4 | |||
Citi Holdings' Significant Interests in Unconsolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification
The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of significant interests in unconsolidated VIEs:
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trading account assets | $ | 4.0 | $ | 4.4 | |||
Investments | 9.8 | 8.2 | |||||
Loans | 12.8 | 12.4 | |||||
Other assets | 0.1 | 2.6 | |||||
Total assets of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs | $ | 26.7 | $ | 27.6 | |||
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | Citicorp | Citi Holdings | Citigroup | Citicorp | Citi Holdings | Citigroup | ||||||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | $ | 0.5 | $ | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading account assets | $ | 4.1 | $ | 2.9 | $ | 7.0 | $ | 3.2 | $ | 3.1 | $ | 6.3 | ||||||||||||||
Investments | 2.9 | 6.9 | 9.8 | 2.0 | 7.3 | 9.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | 6.0 | 8.8 | 14.8 | 2.3 | 10.5 | 12.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other | 2.4 | 2.4 | 4.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 15.4 | $ | 21.0 | $ | 36.4 | $ | 8.0 | $ | 21.0 | $ | 29.0 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | $ | 0.5 | $ | — | $ | 0.5 | $ | 0.5 | $ | — | $ | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.4 | — | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs | $ | 0.9 | $ | 0.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 0.9 | $ | — | $ | 0.9 | $ | 0.8 | $ | 0.2 | $ | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||
Credit Card Securitizations
The Company securitizes credit card receivables through trusts that are established to purchase the receivables. Citigroup sellstransfers receivables into the QSPE trusts on a non-recourse basis. Credit card securitizations are revolving securitizations; that is, as customers pay their credit card balances, the cash proceeds are used to purchase new receivables and replenish the receivables in the trust. Prior to 2010, such transfers were accounted for as sale transactions under SFAS 140 and, accordingly, the sold assets were removed from the consolidated balance sheet and a gain or loss was recognized in connection with the transaction. With the adoption of SFAS 166 and SFAS 167, beginning in 2010 the trusts are treated as consolidated entities, because, as servicer, Citigroup has power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the trusts and also holds a seller's interest and certain securities issued by the trusts, and provides liquidity facilities to the trusts, which could result in potentially significant losses or benefits from the trusts. Accordingly, the transferred credit card receivables are required to remain on the Consolidated Balance Sheet with no gain or loss recognized. The debt issued by the trusts to third parties is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
The Company relies on securitizations to fund a significant portion of its managedcredit card businesses in North America Cards business.
America. The following table reflects amounts related to the Company's securitized credit card receivables at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:receivables:
| Citicorp | Citi Holdings | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||
Principal amount of credit card receivables in trusts | $ | 77.4 | $ | 78.3 | $ | 42.6 | $ | 45.7 | |||||
Ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables: | �� | ||||||||||||
Sold to investors via trust-issued securities | 65.5 | 68.2 | 28.3 | 30.0 | |||||||||
Retained by Citigroup as trust-issued securities | 5.1 | 1.2 | 9.0 | 5.4 | |||||||||
Retained by Citigroup via non-certificated interests recorded as consumer loans | 6.8 | 8.9 | 5.3 | 10.3 | |||||||||
Total ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables | $ | 77.4 | $ | 78.3 | $ | 42.6 | $ | 45.7 | |||||
Other amounts recorded on the balance sheet related to interests retained in the trusts: | |||||||||||||
Other retained interests in securitized assets | $ | 1.2 | $ | 1.2 | $ | 1.6 | $ | 2.0 | |||||
Residual interest in securitized assets(1) | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 1.4 | |||||||||
Amounts payable to trusts | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |||||||||
| Citicorp | Citi Holdings | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||
Principal amount of credit card receivables in trusts | $ | 70.8 | $ | 78.8 | $ | 36.5 | $ | 42.3 | ||||||
Ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables | ||||||||||||||
Sold to investors via trust-issued securities | 49.1 | 66.5 | 18.2 | 28.2 | ||||||||||
Retained by Citigroup as trust-issued securities | 4.4 | 5.0 | 7.6 | 10.1 | ||||||||||
Retained by Citigroup via non-certificated interests | 17.3 | 7.3 | 10.7 | 4.0 | ||||||||||
Total ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables | $ | 70.8 | $ | 78.8 | $ | 36.5 | $ | 42.3 | ||||||
Other amounts recorded on the balance sheet related to interests retained in the trusts | ||||||||||||||
Other retained interests in securitized assets | NA | $ | 1.4 | NA | $ | 1.6 | ||||||||
Residual interest in securitized assets(1) | NA | 0.3 | NA | 1.2 | ||||||||||
Amounts payable to trusts | NA | 1.2 | NA | 0.8 | ||||||||||
Credit Card Securitizations—Citicorp
In the second quarter of 2009 and 2008, theThe Company recorded net gains (losses) from securitization of Citicorp's credit card receivables of $51 million and ($141) million, and $151 million during the three and ($146) million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.2009. Net gains (losses) reflect the following:
The following tables summarizetable summarizes selected cash flow information related to Citicorp's credit card securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:
| Three months ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | |||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | 5.9 | $ | 3.2 | |||
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables | 36.1 | 44.6 | |||||
Contractual servicing fees received | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | 0.7 | 1.0 | |||||
| Three months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | — | $ | 5.9 | |||
Pay down of maturing notes | (6.9 | ) | N/A | ||||
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables | N/A | 36.1 | |||||
Contractual servicing fees received | N/A | 0.3 | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | N/A | 0.7 | |||||
N/A—Not applicable due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | — | $ | 10.6 | |||
Pay down of maturing notes | (17.4 | ) | N/A | ||||
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables | N/A | 71.5 | |||||
Contractual servicing fees received | N/A | 0.6 | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | N/A | 1.6 | |||||
N/A—Not applicable due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167
Managed Loans
| Six months ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | |||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | 10.6 | $ | 9.2 | |||
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables | 71.5 | 86.7 | |||||
Contractual servicing fees received | 0.6 | 0.6 | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | 1.6 | 2.1 | |||||
As of June 30, 2009previously mentioned, prior to 2010, securitized receivables were treated as sold and December 31, 2008,removed from the residual interestbalance sheet. Beginning in 2010, all securitized credit card receivables was valued at $0 for Citicorp. As such, key assumptions usedare included in measuring the fair value ofConsolidated Balance Sheet. Accordingly, the residual interest are not provided for the three months ended June 30, 2009 or as of June 30, 2009. Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the residual interests at the date of sale or securitization of Citicorp's credit card receivables for the three months ended June 30 2008 are as follows:
| ||||
| ||||
| ||||
At June 30, 2009, the sensitivity of the fair valueManaged-basis (Managed) presentation is only relevant prior to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:
In millions of dollars | Residual interest | Retained certificates | Other retained interests | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying value of retained interests | $ | — | $ | 5,177 | $ | 1,426 | |||||
Discount rates | |||||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | — | $ | (13 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | |||
Adverse change of 20% | — | (25 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||
Constant prepayment rate | |||||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||
Adverse change of 20% | — | — | — | ||||||||
Anticipated net credit losses | |||||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (36 | ) | ||||
Adverse change of 20% | — | — | (71 | ) | |||||||
Managed Loans—Citicorp2010.
After securitization of credit card receivables, the Company continues to maintain credit card customer account relationships and provides servicing for receivables transferred to the trusts. As a result, the Company considers the securitized credit card receivables to be part of the business it manages.
Managed-basis (Managed) presentations are non-GAAP financial measures. Managed presentations include results from both the on-balance sheeton-balance-sheet loans and off-balance sheetoff-balance-sheet loans, and exclude the impact of card securitization activity. Managed presentations assume that securitized loans have not been sold and present the results of the securitized loans in the same manner as Citigroup's owned loans. Citigroup's management believes that Managed presentations provide a greater understanding of ongoing operations and enhance comparability of those results in prior periods as well as demonstrating the effects of unusual gains and charges in the current period. Management further believes that a meaningful analysis of the Company's financial performance requires an understanding of the factors underlying that performance and that investors find it useful to see these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze financial performance without the impact of unusual items that may obscure trends in Citigroup's underlying performance.
Managed Loans—Citicorp
The following tables present a reconciliation between the Managed basis and on-balance sheeton-balance-sheet credit card portfolios and the related delinquencies (loans which are 90 days or more past due) and credit losses, net of recoveries.
In millions of dollars, except loans in billions | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loan amounts, at period end | |||||||
On balance sheet | $ | 42.1 | $ | 45.5 | |||
Securitized amounts | 70.7 | 69.5 | |||||
Total managed loans | $ | 112.8 | $ | 115.0 | |||
Delinquencies, at period end | |||||||
On balance sheet | $ | 1,459 | $ | 1,402 | |||
Securitized amounts | 1,898 | 1,543 | |||||
Total managed delinquencies | $ | 3,357 | $ | 2,945 | |||
In millions of dollars, except loans in billions | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loan amounts, at period end | |||||||
On balance sheet | $ | 109.5 | $ | 44.8 | |||
Securitized amounts | — | 72.6 | |||||
Total managed loans | $ | 109.5 | $ | 117.4 | |||
Delinquencies, at period end | |||||||
On balance sheet | $ | 2,690 | $ | 1,165 | |||
Securitized amounts | — | 2,121 | |||||
Total managed delinquencies | $ | 2,690 | $ | 3,286 | |||
Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the three months ended June 30, | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On balance sheet | $ | 978 | $ | 700 | |||
Securitized amounts | 1,838 | 1,043 | |||||
Total managed | $ | 2,816 | $ | 1,743 | |||
Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the three months ended June 30, | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On balance sheet | $ | 2,620 | $ | 978 | |||
Securitized amounts | — | 1,838 | |||||
Total managed | $ | 2,620 | $ | 2,816 | |||
Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the six months ended June 30, | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On balance sheet | $ | 1,815 | $ | 1,338 | |||
Securitized amounts | 3,329 | 1,923 | |||||
Total managed | $ | 5,144 | $ | 3,261 | |||
Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the six months ended June 30, | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On balance sheet | $ | 5,368 | $ | 1,815 | |||
Securitized amounts | — | 3,329 | |||||
Total managed | $ | 5,368 | $ | 5,144 | |||
Credit Card Securitizations—Securitizations—Citi Holdings
In the second quarter of 2009 and 2008, theThe Company recorded net gains (losses)losses from securitization of Citi Holding'sHoldings' credit card receivables of ($612)$(612) million and ($35), and ($676) and $192$(676) million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.2009.
The following tables summarizetable summarizes selected cash flow information related to Citi Holding'sHoldings' credit card securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:
| Three months ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | |||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | 10.6 | $ | 6.8 | |||
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables | 13.6 | 13.0 | |||||
Contractual servicing fees received | 0.2 | 0.2 | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | 0.6 | 0.9 | |||||
| Six months ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | |||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | 18.7 | $ | 10.8 | |||
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables | 25.8 | 26.4 | |||||
Contractual servicing fees received | 0.4 | 0.4 | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | 1.2 | 1.8 | |||||
| Three months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | 2.1 | $ | 10.6 | |||
Pay down of maturing notes | (4.0 | ) | N/A | ||||
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables | N/A | 13.6 | |||||
Contractual servicing fees received | N/A | 0.2 | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | N/A | 0.6 | |||||
Key assumptions used in measuringN/A—Not applicable due to the fair valueadoption of SFAS 166/167
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | 3.8 | $ | 18.7 | |||
Pay down of maturing notes | (13.8 | ) | N/A | ||||
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables | N/A | 25.8 | |||||
Contractual servicing fees received | N/A | 0.4 | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | N/A | 1.2 | |||||
N/A—Not applicable due to the residual interest at the dateadoption of sale or securitization of Citi Holding's credit card receivables for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are as follows:SFAS 166/167
| June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Discount rate | 19.7% | 17.9% | ||
Constant prepayment rate | 6.0% to 10.7% | 7.1% to 12.2% | ||
Anticipated net credit losses | 12.2% to 13.1% | 6.6% to 6.8% |
The constant prepayment rate assumption range reflects the projected payment rates over the life of a credit card balance, excluding new card purchases. This results in a high payment in the early life of the securitized balances followed by a much lower payment rate, which is depicted in the disclosed range.
The effect of two negative changes in each of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of retained interests is required to be disclosed. The negative effect of each change must be calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not in fact be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.
At June 30, 2009, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:
In millions of dollars | Residual interest | Retained certificates | Other retained interests | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying value of retained interests | $ | 562 | $ | 8,784 | $ | 2,005 | |||||
Discount rates | |||||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (32 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (62 | ) | (52 | ) | (10 | ) | |||||
Constant prepayment rate | |||||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (39 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
Adverse change of 20% | (74 | ) | — | — | |||||||
Anticipated net credit losses | |||||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (377 | ) | $ | — | $ | (43 | ) | |||
Adverse change of 20% | (560 | ) | — | (85 | ) | ||||||
Managed Loans—Citi Holdings
After securitization of credit card receivables, the Company continues to maintain credit card customer account relationships and provides servicing for receivables transferred to the trusts. As a result, the Company considers the securitized credit card receivables to be part of the business it manages.
Managed-basis (Managed) presentations are non-GAAP financial measures. Managed presentations include results from both the on-balance sheet loans and off-balance sheet loans, and exclude the impact of card securitization activity. Managed presentations assume that securitized loans have not been sold and present the results of the securitized loans in the same manner as Citigroup's owned loans. Citigroup's management believes that Managed presentations provide a greater understanding of ongoing operations and enhance comparability of those results in prior periods as well as demonstrating the effects of unusual gains and charges in the current period. Management further believes that a meaningful analysis of the Company's financial performance requires an understanding of the factors underlying that performance and that investors find it useful to see these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze financial performance without the impact of unusual items that may obscure trends in Citigroup's underlying performance.
The following tables present a reconciliation between the Managed basis and on-balance sheeton-balance-sheet credit card portfolios and the related delinquencies (loans which are 90 days or more past due) and credit losses, net of recoveries.
In millions of dollars, except loans in billions | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loan amounts, at period end | |||||||
On balance sheet | $ | 22.8 | $ | 30.1 | |||
Securitized amounts | 37.6 | 36.3 | |||||
Loans held-for-sale | — | — | |||||
Total managed loans | $ | 60.4 | $ | 66.4 | |||
Delinquencies, at period end | |||||||
On balance sheet | $ | 845 | $ | 741 | |||
Securitized amounts | 1,214 | 1,113 | |||||
Loans held-for-sale | — | — | |||||
Total managed delinquencies | $ | 2,059 | $ | 1,854 | |||
In millions of dollars, except loans in billions | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Loan amounts, at period end | |||||||
On balance sheet | $ | 56.6 | $ | 27.0 | |||
Securitized amounts | — | 38.8 | |||||
Total managed loans | $ | 56.6 | $ | 65.8 | |||
Delinquencies, at period end | |||||||
On balance sheet | $ | 1,895 | $ | 1,250 | |||
Securitized amounts | — | 1,326 | |||||
Total managed delinquencies | $ | 1,895 | $ | 2,576 | |||
Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the three months ended June 30, | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On balance sheet | $ | 872 | $ | 565 | |||
Securitized amounts | 1,278 | 725 | |||||
Loans held-for-sale | — | — | |||||
Total managed | $ | 2,150 | $ | 1,290 | |||
Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the three months ended June 30, | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On balance sheet | $ | 1,951 | $ | 1,155 | |||
Securitized amounts | — | 1,277 | |||||
Total managed credit losses | $ | 1,951 | $ | 2,432 | |||
Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the six months ended June 30, | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On balance sheet | $ | 1,773 | $ | 1,048 | |||
Securitized amounts | 2,335 | 1,436 | |||||
Loans held-for-sale | — | — | |||||
Total managed | $ | 4,108 | $ | 2,484 | |||
Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the six months ended June 30, | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On balance sheet | $ | 4,077 | $ | 2,260 | |||
Securitized amounts | — | 2,335 | |||||
Total managed credit losses | $ | 4,077 | $ | 4,595 | |||
Funding, Liquidity Facilities and Subordinated Interests
Citigroup securitizes credit card receivables through three securitization trusts—Citibank Credit Card Master Trust ("Master Trust"), which is part of Citicorp, and the Citibank OMNI Master Trust ("Omni Trust") and Broadway Credit Card Trust ("Broadway Trust"), which are part of Citi Holdings.
Master Trust issues fixedfixed- and floating-rate term notes as well as commercial paper through the Dakota program.paper. Some of the term notes are issued to multi-seller commercial paper conduits. In the first half of 2009, the Master Trust has issued $4.3 billion of notes that are eligible for the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) program, where investors can borrow from the Federal Reserve using the trust securities as collateral. The weighted average maturity of the term notes issued by the Master Trust was 3.53.7 years as of June 30, 20092010 and 3.83.6 years as of December 31, 2008.
Table2009. Beginning in 2010, the liabilities of Contentsthe trusts are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Master Trust liabilities:liabilities (at par value)
In billions | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Term notes issued to multi-seller CP conduits | $ | 0.5 | $ | 1.0 | |||
Term notes issued to other third parties | 54.0 | 56.2 | |||||
Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates | 5.1 | 1.2 | |||||
Dakota commercial paper program | 11.0 | 11.0 | |||||
Total Master Trust liabilities | $ | 70.6 | $ | 69.4 | |||
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Term notes issued to multi- seller CP conduits | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.8 | |||
Term notes issued to third parties | 43.9 | 51.2 | |||||
Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates | 4.4 | 5.0 | |||||
Commercial paper | 5.0 | 14.5 | |||||
Total Master Trust liabilities | $ | 53.5 | $ | 71.5 | |||
Both Omni and Broadway Trusts issue fixedfixed- and floating-rate term notes, some of which are purchased by multi-seller commercial paper conduits. The Omni Trust also issues commercial paper through the Palisades program. Apaper. During 2009, a portion of the PalisadesOmni Trust commercial paper hashad been purchased by the Federal Reserve's Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF). In addition, some of the multi-seller conduits that hold Omni Trust term notes havehad placed commercial paper with CPFF. No Omni trust liabilities were funded through CPFF as of June 30, 2010. The total amount of Omni Trust liabilities funded directly or indirectly through the CPFF was $9.3 billion at June 30, 2009 and $6.9$2.5 billion at December 31, 2008.2009.
In the second quarter of 2009, Omni Trust issued $4.0 billion of term notes that are eligible for the TALF program. The weighted average maturity of the third-party term notes issued by the Omni Trust was 0.92.2 years as of June 30, 20092010 and 0.5 years as of December 31, 2008.2009. The weighted average maturity of the third-party term notes issued by the Broadway Trust was 3.12.0 years as of June 30, 20092010 and 3.32.5 years as of December 31, 2008.2009.
Omni Trust liabilities:liabilities (at par value)
In billions | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Term notes issued to multi- seller CP conduits | $ | 13.3 | $ | 17.8 | |||
Term notes issued to other third parties | 5.1 | 2.3 | |||||
Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates | 8.7 | 5.1 | |||||
Palisades commercial paper program | 8.5 | 8.5 | |||||
Total Omni Trust liabilities | $ | 35.6 | $ | 33.7 | |||
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Term notes issued to multi- seller commercial paper conduits | $ | 7.4 | $ | 13.1 | |||
Term notes issued to third parties | 9.2 | 9.2 | |||||
Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates | 7.4 | 9.8 | |||||
Commercial paper | — | 4.4 | |||||
Total Omni Trust liabilities | $ | 24.0 | $ | 36.5 | |||
Broadway Trust liabilities:liabilities (at par value)
In billions | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Term notes issued to multi- seller CP conduits | $ | 0.4 | $ | 0.4 | |||
Term notes issued to other third parties | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||||
Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||||
Total Broadway Trust liabilities | $ | 1.7 | $ | 1.7 | |||
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Term notes issued to multi-seller commercial paper conduits | $ | 0.5 | $ | 0.5 | |||
Term notes issued to third parties | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||||
Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||||
Total Broadway Trust liabilities | $ | 1.8 | $ | 1.8 | |||
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. is the sole provider of full liquidity facilities to the commercial paper programs of the Master and Omni Trusts. Both of these facilities, which represent contractual obligations on the part of Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. to provide liquidity for the issued commercial paper, are made available on market terms to each of the trusts. The liquidity facilities require Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. to purchase the commercial paper issued by each trust at maturity, if the commercial paper does not roll over, as long as there are available credit enhancements outstanding, typically in the form of subordinated notes. As there was no Omni trust commercial paper outstanding as of June 30, 2010, there was no liquidity commitment at that time. The liquidity commitment related to the Omni Trust commercial paper programs amounted to $8.5$4.4 billion at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008. During the second quarter of 2009, $4 billion of the Omni Trust liquidity facility was drawn to pay down maturing commercial paper held by a single investor. This investor made its initial investment in Omni Trust commercial paper in January 2009 and was covered by the Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. liquidity facility. The portion of the liquidity facility related to the maturing commercial paper was cancelled during the 2009 second quarter and is no longer outstanding as of June 30, 2009. The liquidity commitment related to the Master Trust commercial paper program amounted to $11 $5.0
billion at both June 30, 20092010 and $14.5 billion at December 31, 2008.2009. As of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, none of the Master Trust or Omni Trust liquidity commitments werecommitment was drawn.
In addition, Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. provideshad provided liquidity to a third-party, non-consolidated multi-seller commercial paper conduit, which is not a VIE. The commercial paper conduit hashad acquired notes issued by the Omni Trust. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. provides the liquidity facility on market terms. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. will be required to act in its capacity as liquidity provider as long as there are available credit enhancements outstanding and if: (1) the conduit is unable to roll over its maturing commercial paper; or (2) Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. loses its A-1/P-1 credit rating. The liquidity commitment to the third-party conduit was $5.2 billion at June 30, 2009 and $4$2.5 billion at December 31, 2008. As2009, of June, 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,which none of this liquidity commitment was drawn.
AllDuring 2009, all three of Citigroup's primary credit card securitization trusts have trusts—Master Trust, Omni Trust, and Broadway Trust—had bonds placed on ratings watch with negative implications by rating agencies during the first and second quarters of 2009.agencies. As a result of the ratings watch status, certain actions were taken by Citi with respect to each of the trusts. In general, the actions subordinated certain senior interests in the trust assets that were retained by Citigroup,Citi, which effectively placed these interests below investor interests in terms of priority of payment. With
As a result of these actions, based on the applicable regulatory capital rules, Citigroup began including the sold assets for all three of the credit card securitization trusts in its risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating its risk-based capital ratios during 2009. The increase in risk-weighted assets occurred in the quarter during 2009 in which the respective actions took place. The effect of these changes increased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by approximately $82 billion, and decreased Citigroup's Tier 1 Capital ratio by approximately 100 basis points each as of March 31, 2009, with respect to the Master Trust, in the first quarterand Omni Trusts. The inclusion of 2009, Citigroup subordinated a portion of its "seller's interest", which represents a senior interest in Trust receivables, thus making those cash flows available to pay investor coupon each month. In addition, during the second quarter of 2009, a subordinated note with a $3 billion principal amount was issued by the Master Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The note is
classified as Held-to-maturity Investment Securities as Citigroup has the intent and ability to hold the security until its maturity. With respect to the Omni Trust, in the second quarter of 2009, subordinated notes with a principal amount of $2 billion were issued by the Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The notes are classified as Trading account assets. These notes are in addition to a $265 million subordinated note issued by Omni Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. in the fourth quarter of 2008 for the purpose of providing additional credit support for senior noteholders. With respect to the Broadway Trust subordinated notes with a principal amountincreased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by an additional approximately $900 million at June 30, 2009. With the consolidation of $82 million were issuedthe trusts, beginning in 2010 the credit card receivables that had previously been considered sold under SFAS 140 are now included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and accordingly these assets continue to be included in Citigroup's risk-weighted assets. All bond ratings for each of the trusts have been affirmed by the Trustrating agencies and retained by Citibank, N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The notes are classifiedno downgrades have occurred as Trading account assets.
Table of ContentsJune 30, 2010.
Mortgage Securitizations
The Company provides a wide range of mortgage loan products to a diverse customer base. In connection with the securitization of these loans, the Company's U.S. Consumer mortgage business retains the servicing rights, which entitle the Company to a future stream of cash flows based on the outstanding principal balances of the loans and the contractual servicing fee. Failure to service the loans in accordance with contractual requirements may lead to a termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing fees. In non-recourse servicing, the principal credit risk to the Company is the cost of temporary advances of funds. In recourse servicing, the servicer agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans, such as FNMA or FHLMC, or with a private investor, insurer or guarantor. Losses on recourse servicing occur primarily when foreclosure sale proceeds of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance and accrued interest of the loan and the cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property. The Company's mortgage loan securitizations are primarily non-recourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchasers of the securities issued by the trust. Securities and Banking and Special Asset Pool retains servicing for a limited number of its mortgage securitizations.
The Company's Consumer business provides a wide range of mortgage loan products to its customers. Once originated, the Company often securitizes these loans through the use of SPEs, which prior to 2010 were QSPEs. These QSPEsSPEs are funded through the issuance of Trust Certificates backed solely by the transferred assets. These certificates have the same average life as the transferred assets. In addition to providing a source of liquidity and less expensive funding, securitizing these assets also reduces the Company's credit exposure to the borrowers. These mortgage loan securitizations are primarily non-recourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchasers of the securities issued by the trust. However, the CompanyCompany's Consumer business generally retains the servicing rights and in certain instances retains investment securities, interest-only strips and residual interests in future cash flows from the trusts.Securities and Banking andSpecial Asset Pool retain servicing for a limited number of their mortgage securitizations.
The Company securitizes mortgage loans generally through either a government-sponsored agency, such as Ginnie Mae, FNMA or Freddie Mac (U.S. agency—sponsored mortgages), or private label (Non-agency-sponsored mortgages) securitization. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of its U.S. agency-sponsored mortgage securitizations, because Citigroup does not have the power to direct the activities of the SPE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. Therefore, Citi does not consolidate these U.S. agency-sponsored mortgage securitizations. In certain instances, the Company has (1) the power to direct the activities and (2) the obligation to either absorb losses or right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to its non-agency-sponsored mortgage securitizations and therefore, is the primary beneficiary and consolidates the SPE.
Mortgage Securitizations—Securitizations—Citicorp
The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to mortgage securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:
| Three months ended June 30, 2009 | Three months ended June 30, 2008 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | U.S. agency sponsored mortgages | Non-agency sponsored mortgages | Agency and non-agency sponsored mortgages | |||||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | 4.5 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 1.2 | ||||
Contractual servicing fees received | — | — | — | |||||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | — | — | — | |||||||
| Three months ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
In billions of dollars | U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages | Non-agency- sponsored mortgages | Agency- and non-agency- sponsored mortgages | |||||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | 11.4 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 5.6 | ||||
Contractual servicing fees received | 0.1 | — | — | |||||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | — | — | — | |||||||
| Six months ended June 30, 2009 | Six months ended June 30, 2008 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | U.S. agency sponsored mortgages | Non-agency sponsored mortgages | Agency and non-agency sponsored mortgages | |||||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | 5.3 | $ | 1.6 | $ | 3.2 | ||||
Contractual servicing fees received | — | — | — | |||||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | — | — | — |
| Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
In billions of dollars | U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages | Non-agency- sponsored mortgages | Agency- and non-agency- sponsored mortgages | |||||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | 23.2 | $ | 1.1 | $ | 6.9 | ||||
Contractual servicing fees received | 0.3 | — | — | |||||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | — | — | — | |||||||
Gains (losses) recognized on the securitization of non-agency sponsored mortgage activity duringU.S. agency-sponsored mortgages were $1 million and $4 million for the second quarter of 2009 was ($5) million.three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, losses recognized on the securitization of non-agency-sponsored mortgages were $(2) million and $(1) million, respectively.
Agency and non-agency mortgage securitization losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 losses recognized on the securitization of non-agency sponsored mortgages were ($4) million.
Losses recognized on the securitization of agency sponsored mortgage activity during the second quarter of 2009 were ($10) million. For the six months ended June 30 of 2009, losses recognized on the securitization of agency sponsored mortgages were ($7) million.
There were no gains (losses) recognized on the securitization of agency$(15) million and non-agency mortgages in the second quarter of 2008. Agency and non-agency securitization gains (losses) for the six months ended June30, 2008 were $4 million.
Table of Contents$(11) million, respectively.
Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization of mortgage receivables for the three months ended June 30, 20092010 and 20082009 are as follows:
| ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. sponsored mortgages | sponsored mortgages | sponsored mortgages | |||
Discount rate | 0.9% to 37.4% | 2.4% to 39.8% | 0.7% to | |||
Constant prepayment rate | 3.7% to | |||||
3.0% to | ||||||
Anticipated net credit losses | ||||||
NM Not meaningful. Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.
The range in the key assumptions for retained interests in Securities and Banking is due to the different characteristics of the interests retained by the Company. The interests retained by Securities and Banking and Special Asset Pool range from highly rated and/or senior in the capital structure to unrated and/or residual interests.
The effect of adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below. The negative effect of each change is calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not in fact be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.
At June 30, 2009,2010, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:
| June 30, | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. sponsored mortgages | sponsored mortgages | ||
Discount rate | 2.4% to 39.8% | |||
Constant prepayment rate | 3.7% to | |||
3.0% to | ||||
Anticipated net credit losses | ||||
NM Not meaningful. Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.
In millions of dollars | U.S. agency sponsored mortgages | Non-agency sponsored mortgages | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying value of retained interests | $ | 1,149 | $ | 472 | ||||
Discount rates | ||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (12 | ) | $ | (10 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (24 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||
Constant prepayment rate | ||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (5 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Anticipated net credit losses | ||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | — | $ | (11 | ) | |||
Adverse change of 20% | — | (22 | ) | |||||
In millions of dollars | U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages | Non-agency- sponsored mortgages | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying value of retained interests | $ | 2,514 | $ | 730 | ||||
Discount rates | ||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (70 | ) | $ | (19 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (136 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||
Constant prepayment rate | ||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (130 | ) | $ | (15 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (251 | ) | (28 | ) | ||||
Anticipated net credit losses | ||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (44 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (2 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||
Mortgage Securitizations—Citi Holdings
The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to Citi Holdings mortgage securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:
| Three months ended June 30, 2009 | Three months ended June 30, 2008 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | U.S. agency sponsored mortgages | Non-agency sponsored mortgages | Agency and non-agency sponsored mortgages | |||||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | 25.0 | $ | — | $ | 26.3 | ||||
Contractual servicing fees received | 0.3 | — | 0.4 | |||||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | 0.1 | — | 0.2 | |||||||
| Three months ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
In billions of dollars | U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages | Non-agency- sponsored mortgages | Agency- and Non-agency- sponsored mortgages | |||||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 25.0 | ||||
Contractual servicing fees received | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.3 | |||||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | 0.1 | — | 0.1 | |||||||
| Six months ended June 30, 2009 | Six months ended June 30, 2008 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | U.S. agency sponsored mortgages | Non-agency sponsored mortgages | Agency and non-agency sponsored mortgages | |||||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | 45.1 | $ | — | $ | 48.3 | ||||
Contractual servicing fees received | 0.7 | — | 0.7 | |||||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.5 | |||||||
| Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
In billions of dollars | U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages | Non-agency- sponsored mortgages | Agency- and Non-agency- sponsored Mortgages | |||||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 45.1 | ||||
Contractual servicing fees received | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.7 | |||||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | 0.1 | — | 0.3 | |||||||
The Company did not recognize gains (losses) on the securitization of U.S. agencyagency- and non-agency sponsorednon-agency-sponsored mortgages in the second quarter of 2009, as well as thethree and six months ended June 30, 2009. There were gains from the securitization of agency2010 and non-agency sponsored mortgages of $55 million and $57 million in the second quarter of 2008, and the six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.2009.
Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization of mortgage receivables for the three months ended June 30, 20092010 and 20082009 are as follows:
| Three months ended June 30, | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | ||||||
| U.S. sponsored mortgages | sponsored mortgages | sponsored mortgages | |||
Discount rate | ||||||
Constant prepayment rate | ||||||
Anticipated net credit losses | — | |||||
N/A Not applicable
The range in the key assumptions for Special Asset Pool retained interests in Special Asset Pool is due to the different characteristics of the interests retained by the Company. The interests retained by Securities and Banking range from highly rated and/or senior in the capital structure to unrated and/or residual interests.
The effect of adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below. The negative effect of each change is calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not in fact be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.
At June 30, 2009,2010, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:
| June 30, | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
| U.S. sponsored mortgages | sponsored mortgages | ||
Discount rate | ||||
Constant prepayment rate | ||||
Anticipated net credit losses | NM | 0.1% to 70.0% | ||
Weighted average life | ||||
In millions of dollars | U.S. agency sponsored mortgages | Non-agency sponsored mortgages | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying value of retained interests | $ | 7,205 | $ | 1,092 | ||||
Discount rates | ||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (233 | ) | $ | (53 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (451 | ) | (103 | ) | ||||
Constant prepayment rate | ||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (387 | ) | $ | (56 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (744 | ) | (109 | ) | ||||
Anticipated net credit losses | ||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (35 | ) | $ | (46 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (71 | ) | (91 | ) | ||||
In millions of dollars | U.S. agency- sponsored mortgages | Non-agency- sponsored mortgages | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying value of retained interests | $ | 2,662 | $ | 541 | ||||
Discount rates | ||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (96 | ) | $ | (27 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (186 | ) | (53 | ) | ||||
Constant prepayment rate | ||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (215 | ) | $ | (43 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (412 | ) | (82 | ) | ||||
Anticipated net credit losses | ||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (40 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (14 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||
NM Not meaningful. Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.
Mortgage Servicing Rights
In connection with the securitization of mortgage loans, the Company's U.S. Consumer mortgage business retains the servicing rights, which entitle the Company to a future stream of cash flows based on the outstanding principal balances of the loans and the contractual servicing fee. Failure to service the loans in accordance with contractual requirements may lead to a termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing fees.
The fair value of capitalized mortgage loan servicing rights (MSR)(MSRs) was $6.7$4.9 billion and $8.9$6.7 billion at June 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, respectively. The MSRs correspond to principal loan balances of $586$509 billion and $578$586 billion as of June 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, respectively. The following table summarizes the changes in capitalized MSRs for the three and six months ended June 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:
| Three Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
Balance, at March 31 | $ | 5,481 | $ | 7,716 | |||
Originations | 391 | 424 | |||||
Purchases | — | — | |||||
Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions | 1,343 | 1,066 | |||||
Transfer to Trading account assets | — | (59 | ) | ||||
Other changes(1) | (445 | ) | (213 | ) | |||
Balance, at June 30 | $ | 6,770 | $ | 8,934 | |||
| Three months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Balance, as of March 31 | $ | 6,439 | $ | 5,481 | |||
Originations | 117 | 391 | |||||
Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions | (1,384 | ) | 1,343 | ||||
Other changes(1) | (278 | ) | (445 | ) | |||
Balance, as of June 30 | $ | 4,894 | $ | 6,770 | |||
| Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
Balance, at December 31 | $ | 5,657 | $ | 8,380 | |||
Originations | 626 | 769 | |||||
Purchases | — | 1 | |||||
Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions | 1,517 | 505 | |||||
Transfer to Trading account assets | — | (163 | ) | ||||
Other changes(1) | (1,030 | ) | (558 | ) | |||
Balance, at June 30 | $ | 6,770 | $ | 8,934 | |||
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Balance, as of the beginning of year | $ | 6,530 | $ | 5,657 | |||
Originations | 269 | 626 | |||||
Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions | (1,294 | ) | 1,517 | ||||
Other changes(1) | (611 | ) | (1,030 | ) | |||
Balance, as of June 30 | $ | 4,894 | $ | 6,770 | |||
The market for MSRs is not sufficiently liquid to provide participants with quoted market prices. Therefore, the Company uses an option-adjusted spread valuation approach to determine the fair value of MSRs. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted discount rates. The key assumptions used in the valuation of MSRs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates. The model assumptions and the MSRs' fair value
estimates are compared to observable trades of similar MSR portfolios and interest-only security portfolios, as available, as well as to MSR broker valuations and industry surveys. The cash flow model and underlying prepayment and interest rate models used to value these MSRs are subject to validation in accordance with the Company's model validation policies.
The fair value of the MSRs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. In managing this risk, the Company economically hedges a significant portion of the value of its MSRs through the use of interest rate derivative contracts, forward purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities and purchased securities classified as trading.
The Company receives fees during the course of servicing previously securitized mortgages. The amountamounts of these fees for the three and six months ended June 30, 20092010 and 20082009 were as follows:
| Three months ended, | Six months ended, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||
Servicing fees | $ | 429 | $ | 420 | $ | 858 | $ | 831 | |||||
Late fees | 23 | 24 | 48 | 50 | |||||||||
Ancillary fees | 22 | 17 | 42 | 35 | |||||||||
Total MSR fees | $ | 474 | $ | 461 | $ | 948 | $ | 916 | |||||
| Three months ended June 30, | Six months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Servicing fees | $ | 344 | $ | 429 | $ | 713 | $ | 858 | |||||
Late fees | 21 | 23 | 44 | 48 | |||||||||
Ancillary fees | 53 | 22 | 92 | 42 | |||||||||
Total MSR fees | $ | 418 | $ | 474 | $ | 849 | $ | 948 | |||||
These fees are classified in the Consolidated Statement of Income asCommissions and fees.
Student Loan Securitizations
Through The Company indirectly owns, through Citibank, N.A., 80% of the Company's outstanding common stock of The Student Loan Corporation (SLC), which is located within Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending. Through this business, within Citi Holdings, the Company maintains programs to securitize certain portfolios of student loan assets. Under these securitization programs, transactions qualifying as sales are off-balance sheet transactions in which the loans are removed from the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and sold to a QSPE. These QSPEsVIEs (some of them being former QSPEs), which are funded through the issuance of pass-through term notes collateralized solely by the trust assets. For
The Company has (1) the power to direct the activities of these off-balance sheetVIEs that most significantly impact their economic performance and (2) the obligation to either absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIEs.
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 166 and SFAS 167, the Company consolidated all student loan trusts that were formerly QSPEs, as well as newly created securitization VIEs, as the primary beneficiary. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 166 and SFAS 167, the student loan securitizations through QSPEs were accounted for as off-balance-sheet securitizations, with the Company generally retainsretaining interests in the form of subordinated residual interests (i.e., interest-onlyinterest only strips) and servicing rights.
Under terms of the trust arrangements, the Company has no obligationsobligation to provide financial support and has not provided such support. A substantial portion of the credit risk associated with the securitized loans has been transferred to third-party guarantors or insurers either under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFEL Program), authorized by the U.S. Department of Education under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, or through private credit insurance. On March 30, 2010, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 was signed into law, which eliminated new FFEL Program loan originations. Effective July 1, 2010, in compliance with this regulatory change, SLC ceased originating new FFEL Program loans. This change is not currently anticipated to materially impact the Company's financial statements.
The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to student loan securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:
| Three months ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | |||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | — | $ | 2.0 | |||
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables | — | — | |||||
Contractual servicing fees received | — | — | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | — | 0.1 | |||||
| Six months ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | June 30, 2008 | |||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | — | $ | 2.0 | |||
Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables | — | — | |||||
Contractual servicing fees received | — | — | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||
Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the residual interest at the date of sale or securitization of Citi Holding's student loan receivables for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are as follows:
| Three months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | 2009 | ||||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | — | — | |||||
At June 30, 2009, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:
In millions of dollars | Retained interests | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying value of retained interests | $ | 977 | |||
Discount rates | |||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (29 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (56 | ) | |||
Constant prepayment rate | |||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (5 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (11 | ) | |||
Anticipated net credit losses | |||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (5 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (10 | ) | |||
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | $ | — | $ | 0.1 | |||
On-Balance Sheet Securitizations—Citi Holdings
The Company engages in on-balance sheet securitizations. These are securitizations that do not qualify for sales treatment; thus, the assets remain on the Company's balance sheet. The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of consolidated assets and liabilities transferred in transactions from the Consumer credit card, student loan, mortgage and auto businesses, accounted for as secured borrowings:
In billions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.3 | |||
Available-for-sale securities | 0.1 | 0.1 | |||||
Loans | 17.7 | 7.5 | |||||
Allowance for loan losses | (0.2 | ) | (0.1 | ) | |||
Other | 0.5 | — | |||||
Total assets | $ | 18.3 | $ | 7.8 | |||
Long-term debt | $ | 13.7 | $ | 6.3 | |||
Other liabilities | 0.1 | 0.3 | |||||
Total liabilities | $ | 13.8 | $ | 6.6 | |||
All assets are restricted from being sold or pledged as collateral. The cash flows from these assets are the only source used to pay down the associated liabilities, which are non-recourse to the Company's general assets.
Citi-Administered Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Conduits
The Company is active in the asset-backed commercial paper conduit business as administrator of several multi-seller commercial paper conduits, and also as a service provider to single-seller and other commercial paper conduits sponsored by third parties.
The multi-seller commercial paper conduits are designed to provide the Company's customersclients access to low-cost funding in the commercial paper markets. The conduits purchase assets from or provide financing facilities to customersclients and are funded by issuing commercial paper to third-party investors. The conduits generally do not purchase assets originated by the Company. The funding of the conduit is facilitated by the liquidity support and credit enhancements provided by the Company.
As administrator to the conduits, the Company is generally responsible for selecting and structuring of assets purchased or financed by the conduits, making decisions regarding the funding of the conduits, including determining the tenor and other features of the commercial paper issued, monitoring the quality and performance of the conduits' assets, and facilitating the operations and cash flows of the conduits. In return, the Company earns structuring fees from customers for individual transactions and earns an administration fee from the conduit, which is equal to the income from client program and liquidity fees of the conduit after payment of interest costs and other fees. This administration fee is fairly stable, since most risks and rewards of the underlying assets are passed back to the customersclients and, once the asset pricing is negotiated, most ongoing income, costs and fees are relatively stable as a percentage of the conduit's size.
The conduits administered by the Company do not generally invest in liquid securities that are formally rated by third parties. The assets are privately negotiated and structured transactions that are designed to be held by the conduit, rather than actively traded and sold. The yield earned by the conduit on each asset is generally tied to the rate on the commercial paper issued by the conduit, thus passing interest rate risk to the client. Each asset purchased by the conduit is structured with transaction-specific credit enhancement features provided by the third-party client seller, including over-collateralization,over collateralization, cash and excess spread collateral accounts, direct recourse or third-party guarantees. These credit enhancements are sized with the objective of approximating a credit rating of A or above, based on the Company's internal risk ratings.
Substantially all of the funding of the conduits is in the form of short-term commercial paper, with a weighted average life generally ranging from 30-4530 to 45 days. As of June 30, 2009,2010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the weighted average lifelives of the commercial paper issued wasby consolidated and unconsolidated conduits were approximately 36 and 37 days respectively. In addition, the conduits have issued subordinate loss notes and equity with a notional amount of approximately $78 million and varying remaining tenors ranging from one month to six years.43 days, respectively.
The primary credit enhancement provided to the conduit investors is in the form of transaction-specific credit enhancement described above. In addition, there are generally two additional forms of credit enhancement that protect the commercial paper investors from defaulting assets. First, the subordinate loss notes issued by each conduit absorb any credit losses up to their full notional amount. It is expected that the subordinate loss notes issued by each unconsolidated conduit are sufficient to absorb a majority of the expected losses from each conduit, thereby making the single investor in the Subordinate Loss Note the primary beneficiary under FIN 46(R)(ASC 810-10-25). Second, each conduit has obtained a letter of credit from the Company, which is generally 8-10% of the conduit's assets. The letters of credit provided by the Company to the consolidated conduits total approximately $4.2 billion and are included in the Company's maximum exposure to loss.$3.4 billion. The net result across all multi-seller conduits administered by the Company is that, in the event defaulted assets exceed the transaction-specific credit enhancement described above, any losses in each conduit are allocated in the following order:
The Company also provides the conduits with two forms of liquidity agreements that are used to provide funding to the conduits in the event of a market disruption, among other events. Each asset of the conduit is supported by a transaction-specific liquidity facility in the form of an asset purchase agreement (APA). Under the APA, the Company has agreed to purchase non-defaulted eligible receivables from the conduit at par. Any assets purchased under the APA are subject to increased pricing. The APA is not designed to provide credit support to the conduit, as it generally does not permit the purchase of defaulted or impaired assets and generally reprices the assets purchased to consider potential increased credit risk.
The APA covers all assets in the conduits and is considered in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. In addition, the Company provides the conduits with program-wide liquidity in the form of short-term lending commitments. Under these commitments, the Company has agreed to lend to the conduits in the event of a short-term disruption in the commercial paper market, subject to specified conditions. The total notional exposure under the program-wide liquidity agreement for the Company's unconsolidated administered conduit as of June 30, 2010, is $11.8$0.6 billion and is considered in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. The Company receives fees for providing both types of liquidity agreement and considers these fees to be on fair market terms.
Finally, the Company is one of several named dealers in the commercial paper issued by the conduits and earns a market-based fee for providing such services. Along with third-party dealers, the Company makes a market in the commercial paper and may from time to time fund commercial paper pending sale to a third party. On specific dates with less liquidity in the market, the Company may hold in inventory commercial paper issued by conduits administered by the Company, as well as conduits administered by third parties. The amount of commercial paper issued by its administered conduits held in inventory fluctuates based on market conditions and activity. As of June 30, 2009,2010, the Company owned approximately $0.2 billionnone of the commercial paper issued by its unconsolidated administered conduits.conduit.
FIN 46(R)(ASC 810-10-25) requiresUpon adoption of SFAS 167 on January 1, 2010, with the exception of the government-guaranteed loan conduit described below, the asset-backed commercial paper conduits were consolidated by the Company. The Company determined that through its role as administrator it had the power to direct the activities that most significantly impacted the entities' economic performance. These powers included its ability to structure and approve the assets purchased by the conduits, its ongoing surveillance and credit mitigation activities, and its liability management. In addition, as a result of all the Company's involvement described above, it was concluded that the Company quantitativelyhad an economic interest that could potentially be significant. However, the assets and liabilities of the Conduits are separate and apart from those of Citigroup. No assets of any Conduit are available to satisfy the creditors of Citigroup or any of its other subsidiaries.
The Company administers one conduit that originates loans to third-party borrowers and those obligations are fully guaranteed primarily by AAA-rated government agencies that support export and development financing programs. The economic performance of this government-guaranteed loan conduit is most significantly impacted by the performance of its underlying assets. The guarantors must approve each loan held by the entity and the guarantors have the ability (through establishment of the servicing terms to direct default mitigation and to purchase defaulted loans) to manage the conduit's loans that become delinquent to improve the economic performance of the conduit. Because the Company does not have the power to direct the activities of this government-guaranteed loan conduit that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity, it was concluded that the Company should not consolidate the entity. As of June 30, 2010, this unconsolidated government-guaranteed loan conduit held assets of approximately $7.6 billion.
Prior to January 1, 2010, the Company was required to analyze the expected variability of the conduit quantitatively to determine whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of the conduit. The Company performsperformed this analysis on a quarterly basis. For conduits where the subordinate loss notes or third partythird-party guarantees arewere sufficient to absorb a majority of the expected loss of the conduit, the Company doesdid not consolidate. In circumstances where the subordinate loss notes or third partythird-party guarantees arewere insufficient to absorb a majority of the expected loss, the Company consolidatesconsolidated the conduit as its primary beneficiary due to the additional credit enhancement provided by the Company. In conducting this analysis, the Company considers three primary sources of variability in the conduit: credit risk, interest-rateinterest rate risk and fee variability.
The Company models the credit risk of the conduit's assets using a Credit Value at Risk (C-VaR) model. The C-VaR model considers changes in credit spreads (both within a rating class as well as due to rating upgrades and downgrades), name-specific changes in credit spreads, credit defaults and recovery rates and diversification effects of pools of financial assets. The model incorporates data from independent rating agencies as well as the Company's own proprietary information regarding spread changes, ratings transitions and losses given default. Using this credit data, a Monte Carlo simulation is performed to develop a distribution of credit risk for the portfolio of assets owned by each conduit, which is then applied on a probability-weighted basis to determine expected losses due to credit risk. In addition, the Company continuously monitors the specific credit characteristics of the conduit's assets and the current credit environment to confirm that the C-VaR model used continues to incorporate the Company's best information regarding the expected credit risk of the conduit's assets.
The Company also analyzes the variability in the fees that it earns from the conduit using monthly actual historical cash flow data to determine average fee and standard deviation measures for each conduit. Because any unhedged interest rate and foreign-currency risk not contractually passed on to customers is absorbed by the fees earned by the Company, the fee variability analysis incorporates those risks.
The fee variability and credit risk variability are then combined into a single distribution of the conduit's overall returns. This return distribution is updated and analyzed on at least a quarterly basis to ensure that the amount of the subordinate loss notes issued to third parties is sufficient to absorb greater than 50% of the total expected variability in the conduit's returns. The expected variability absorbed by the subordinate loss note investors is therefore measured to be greater than the expected variability absorbed by the Company through its liquidity arrangements and other fees earned, and the investors in commercial paper and medium-term notes. While the notional amounts of the subordinate loss notes are quantitatively small compared to the size of the conduits, this is reflective of the fact that most of the substantive risks of the conduits are absorbed by the enhancements provided by the sellers (customers) and other third parties that provide transaction-level credit enhancement. Because FIN 46(R) (ASC 810-10-25) generally requires these risks and related enhancements to be excluded from the analysis, the remaining risks and expected variability are quantitatively small. The calculation of variability under FIN 46(R)(ASC 810-10-25) focuses primarily onexpected variability, rather than the risks associated with extreme outcomes (for example, large levels of default) that are expected to occur very infrequently. So while the subordinate loss notes are sized appropriately compared to expected losses as measured in FIN 46(R)(ASC 810-10-25), they do not provide significant protection against extreme or unusual credit losses. Where such credit losses occur or become expected to occur, the Company would consolidate the conduit due to the additional credit enhancement provided by the Company.
Third-Party Commercial Paper Conduits
The Company also provides liquidity facilities to single- and multi-seller conduits sponsored by third parties. These conduits are independently owned and managed and invest in a variety of asset classes, depending on the nature of the conduit. The facilities provided by the Company typically represent a small portion of the total liquidity facilities obtained by each conduit, and are collateralized by the assets of each conduit. As of June 30, 2009,2010, the notional amount of these facilities was approximately $1 billion and $301$853 million, of which $259 million was funded under these facilities. The Company is not the party that has the power to direct the activities of these conduits that most significantly impact their economic performance and thus does not consolidate them.
Collateralized Debt and Loan Obligations
A securitized collateralized debt obligation (CDO) is an SPE that purchases a pool of assets consisting of asset-backed securities and synthetic exposures through derivatives on asset-backed securities and issues multiple tranches of equity and notes to investors. A third-party asset manager is typically retained by the CDO to select the pool of assets and manage those assets over
the term of the CDO. The Company earns fees for warehousing assets prior to the creation of a CDO, structuring CDOs and placing debt securities with investors. In addition, the Company has retained interests in many of the CDOs it has structured and makes a market in those issued notes.
A cash CDO, or arbitrage CDO, is a CDO designed to take advantage of the difference between the yield on a portfolio of selected assets, typically residential mortgage-backed securities, and the cost of funding the CDO through the sale of notes to investors. "Cash flow" CDOs are vehicles in which the CDO
passes on cash flows from a pool of assets, while "market value" CDOs pay to investors the market value of the pool of assets owned by the CDO at maturity. Both types of CDOs are typically managed by a third-party asset manager. In these transactions, all of the equity and notes issued by the CDO are funded, as the cash is needed to purchase the debt securities. In a typical cash CDO, a third-party investment manager selects a portfolio of assets, which the Company funds through a warehouse financing arrangement prior to the creation of the CDO. The Company then sells the debt securities to the CDO in exchange for cash raised through the issuance of notes. The Company's continuing involvement in cash CDOs is typically limited to investing in a portion of the notes or loans issued by the CDO and making a market in those securities, and acting as derivative counterparty for interest rate or foreign currency swaps used in the structuring of the CDO.
A synthetic CDO is similar to a cash CDO, except that the CDO obtains exposure to all or a portion of the referenced assets synthetically through derivative instruments, such as credit default swaps. Because the CDO does not need to raise cash sufficient to purchase the entire referenced portfolio, a substantial portion of the senior tranches of risk is typically passed on to CDO investors in the form of unfunded liabilities or derivative instruments. Thus, the CDO writes credit protection on select referenced debt securities to the Company or third parties and the risk is then passed on to the CDO investors in the form of funded notes or purchased credit protection through derivative instruments. Any cash raised from investors is invested in a portfolio of collateral securities or investment contracts. The collateral is then used to support the CDO's obligations of the CDO on the credit default swaps written to counterparties. The Company's continuing involvement in synthetic CDOs generally includes purchasing credit protection through credit default swaps with the CDO, owning a portion of the capital structure of the CDO in the form of both unfunded derivative positions (primarily super seniorsuper-senior exposures discussed below) and funded notes, entering into interest-rate swap and total-return swap transactions with the CDO, lending to the CDO, and making a market in those funded notes.
A securitized collateralized loan obligation (CLO) is substantially similar to the CDO transactions described above, except that the assets owned by the SPE (either cash instruments or synthetic exposures through derivative instruments) are corporate loans and to a lesser extent corporate bonds, rather than asset-backed debt securities.
Where a CDO vehicle issues preferred shares, the preferred shares generally represent an insufficient amount of equity (less than 10%) and create the presumption that the preferred shares are insufficient to finance the entity's activities without subordinated financial support. In addition, although the preferred shareholders generally have full exposure to expected losses on the collateral and uncapped potential to receive expected residual rewards, it is not always clear whether they have the ability to make decisions about the entity that have a significant effect on the entity's financial results because of their limited role in making day-to-day decisions and their limited ability to remove the third-party asset manager. Because one or both of the above conditions will generally be met, we have assumed that, even where a CDO vehicle issued preferred shares, the vehicle should be classified as a VIE.
Consolidation and subsequent deconsolidation of CDOs
Substantially all of the CDOs that the Company is involved with are managed by a third-party asset manager. In general, the third-party asset manager, through its ability to purchase and sell assets or, where the reinvestment period of a CDO has expired, the ability to sell assets, will have the power to direct the activities of the vehicle that most significantly impact the economic performance of the CDO. However, where a CDO has experienced an event of default, the activities of the third-party asset manager may be curtailed and certain additional rights will generally be provided to the investors in a CDO vehicle, including the right to direct the liquidation of the CDO vehicle.
The Company has retained significant portions of the "super senior""super-senior" positions issued by certain CDOs. These positions are referred to as "super senior""super-senior" because they represent the most senior positions in the CDO and, at the time of structuring, were senior to tranches rated AAA by independent rating agencies. These positions include facilities structured in the form of short-term commercial paper, where the Company wrote put options ("liquidity puts") to certain CDOs. Under the terms of the liquidity puts, if the CDO was unable to issue commercial paper at a rate below a specified maximum (generally LIBOR + 35bps35 bps to LIBOR + 40 bps), the Company was obligated to fund the senior tranche of the CDO at a specified interest rate. As of June 30, 2009,2010, the Company no longer had purchasedexposure to this commercial paper as all $25 billion of the commercial paper subject to these liquidity puts.underlying CDOs had been liquidated.
Since the inception of many CDO transactions, the subordinate tranches of the CDOs have diminished significantly in value and in rating. The declines in value of the subordinate tranches and in the super seniorsuper-senior tranches indicate that the super seniorsuper-senior tranches are now exposed to a significant portion of the expected losses of the CDOs, based on current market assumptions.
The Company evaluatesdoes not generally have the power to direct the activities of the vehicle that most significantly impact the economic performance of the CDOs as this power is held by the third-party asset manager of the CDO. As such, certain synthetic and cash CDOs that were consolidated under ASC 810, were deconsolidated upon the adoption of SFAS 167. The deconsolidation of certain synthetic CDOs resulted in the recognition of current receivables and payables related to purchased and written credit default swaps entered into by Citigroup with the CDOs, which had previously been eliminated upon consolidation of these transactionsvehicles.
Where: (i) an event of default has occurred for consolidation when reconsideration events occur, as defined in FIN 46(R) (ASC 810-10-25).
Upon a reconsideration event,CDO vehicle, (ii) the Company has the unilateral ability to remove the third-party asset manager without cause or liquidate the CDO, and (iii) the Company has exposure to the vehicle that is potentially significant to the vehicle, the Company will consolidate the CDO. In addition, where the Company is at risk for consolidation only ifthe asset manager of the CDO vehicle and has exposure to the vehicle that is potentially significant, the Company owns a majoritywill generally consolidate the CDO.
The net impact of either a single tranche or a groupadopting SFAS 167 for CDOs was an increase in the Company's assets of tranches that absorb the remaining risk$1.9 billion and liabilities of the CDO. Due to reconsideration events during 2007 and 2008, the Company has consolidated 30$1.9 billion as of the 46 CDOs/CLOs in which the Company holds a majority of the senior interests of the transaction.
January 1, 2010. The Company continues to monitor its involvement in unconsolidated VIEs and ifCDOs. If the Company were to acquire additional interests in these vehicles, be provided the right to direct the activities of a CDO (if the Company obtains the unilateral ability to remove
the third-party asset manager without cause or liquidate the CDO), or if the CDOs' contractual arrangements were to be changed to reallocate expected losses or residual returns among the various interest holders, the Company may be required to consolidate the CDOs. For cash CDOs, the net result of such consolidation would be to gross up the Company's balance sheet by the current fair value of the subordinate securities held by third parties, whichwhose amounts are not considered material. For synthetic CDOs, the net result of such consolidation may reduce the Company's balance sheet by eliminating intercompany derivative receivables and payables in consolidation.
Cash FlowsKey Assumptions and Retained Interests—CiticorpCiti Holdings
The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to CDO and CLO securitizations for the three months ended June 30, 2009:
The key assumptions, used for the securitization of CDOs and CLOs during the three monthsquarter ended June 30, 2009,2010, in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization are as follows:
| CDOs | CLOs | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Discount rate | ||||
The effect of two negative changes in discount rates used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below.
In millions of dollars | CDOs | CLOs | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying value of retained interests | NA | $ | 168 | ||||
Discount rates | |||||||
Adverse change of 10% | NA | $ | (3 | ) | |||
Adverse change of 20% | NA | (6 | ) | ||||
In millions of dollars | CDOs | CLOs | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying value of retained interests | $ | 308 | $ | 673 | ||||
Discount rates | ||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (23 | ) | $ | (9 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (44 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||
Cash Flows and Retained Interests—Citi Holdings
The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to CDO and CLO securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009:
The key assumptions, used for the securitization of CDOs and CLOs during the three months ended June 30, 2009, in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization, are as follows:
The effect of two negative changes in discount rates used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below.
In millions of dollars | CDOs | CLOs | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying value of retained interests | $ | 273 | $ | 702 | ||||
Discount rates | ||||||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (26 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (49 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||
Asset-Based Financing—CiticorpFinancing
The Company provides loans and other forms of financing to VIEs that hold assets. Those loans are subject to the same credit approvals as all other loans originated or purchased by the Company. Financings in the form of debt securities or derivatives are, in most circumstances, reported inTrading account assets and accounted for at fair value through earnings. The Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact these VIEs' economic performance and thus it does not consolidate them.
Asset-Based Financing—Citicorp
The primary types of Citicorp's asset-based financing, total assets of the unconsolidated VIEs with significant involvement and the Company's maximum exposure to loss at June 30, 20092010 are shown below. For the Company to realize that maximum loss, the VIE (borrower) would have to default with no recovery from the assets held by the VIE.
In billions of dollars Type | Total assets | Maximum exposure | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commercial and other real estate | $ | 1.0 | $ | — | |||
Hedge funds and equities | 5.4 | 3.0 | |||||
Corporate loans | — | — | |||||
Airplanes, ships and other assets | 7.3 | 0.9 | |||||
Total | $ | 13.7 | $ | 3.9 | |||
In billions of dollars | Total assets | Maximum exposure | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type | |||||||
Commercial and other real estate | $ | 9.0 | $ | 0.5 | |||
Hedge funds and equities | 5.7 | 3.1 | |||||
Airplanes, ships and other assets | 10.1 | 4.9 | |||||
Total | $ | 24.8 | $ | 8.5 | |||
Asset-Based Financing—Citi Holdings
The Company provides loans and other forms of financing to VIEs that hold assets. Those loans are subject to the same credit approvals as all other loans originated or purchased by the Company. Financings in the form of debt securities or derivatives are, in most circumstances, reported inTrading account assets and accounted for at fair value through earnings.
The primary types of Citi Holdings' asset-based financing, total assets of the unconsolidated VIEs with significant involvement and the Company's maximum exposure to loss at June 30, 20092010 are shown below. For the Company to realize that maximum loss, the VIE (borrower) would have to default with no recovery from the assets held by the VIE.
In billions of dollars Type | Total assets | Maximum exposure | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commercial and other real estate | $ | 45.4 | $ | 8.9 | |||
Hedge funds and equities | 3.2 | 1.8 | |||||
Corporate loans | 7.8 | 6.6 | |||||
Airplanes, ships and other assets | 2.1 | 1.5 | |||||
Total | $ | 58.5 | $ | 18.8 | |||
In billions of dollars | Total assets | Maximum exposure | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Type | |||||||
Commercial and other real estate | $ | 31.2 | $ | 5.8 | |||
Hedge funds and equities | 1.9 | 0.7 | |||||
Corporate loans | 7.6 | 6.5 | |||||
Airplanes, ships and other assets | 5.9 | 2.6 | |||||
Total | $ | 46.6 | $ | 15.6 | |||
The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to asset-based financing for the three and six months ended June 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:
| Three months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | $ | 0.1 | $ | — | |||
| Three months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | $ | 0.4 | $ | 0.1 | |||
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | $ | 2.0 | $ | — | |||
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | $ | 0.9 | $ | 2.0 | |||
The effect of two negative changes in discount rates used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below.
In millions of dollars | Asset based financing | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying value of retained interests | $ | 6,297 | |||
Value of underlying portfolio | |||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | (584 | ) | ||
Adverse change of 20% | (1,215 | ) | |||
In millions of dollars | Asset-based financing | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying value of retained interests | $ | 6,487 | |||
Value of underlying portfolio | |||||
Adverse change of 10% | $ | — | |||
Adverse change of 20% | (153 | ) | |||
Municipal Securities Tender Option Bond (TOB) Trusts
The Company sponsors TOB trusts that hold fixed- and floating-rate, tax-exempt securities issued by state or local municipalities. The trusts are typically single-issuer trusts whose assets are purchased from the Company and from the secondary market. The trusts issueare referred to as Tender Option Bond trusts because the senior interest holders have the ability to tender their interests periodically back to the issuing trust, as described further below.
The TOB trusts fund the purchase of their assets by issuing long-term senior floating rate notes (Floaters) and junior residual securities (Residuals). The Floaters and the Residuals have a long-term rating based ontenor equal to the long-term ratingmaturity of the trust, which is equal to or shorter than the tenor of the underlying municipal bondbond. Residuals are frequently less than 1% of a trust's total funding and a short-term rating based on that ofentitle their holder to the liquidity provider toresidual cash flows from the issuing trust. The Residuals are generally rated based on the long-term rating of the underlying municipal bond and entitle the holder to the residual cash flows from the issuing trust.
bond. The Company sponsors three kinds of TOB trusts: customer TOB trusts, proprietary TOB trusts and QSPE TOB trusts.
Credit rating distribution is based on the external rating of the municipal bonds within the TOB trusts, including any credit enhancement provided by monoline insurance companies or the Company in the primary or secondary markets, as discussed below. The total assets for proprietary TOB Trusts (consolidated and non-consolidated) includes $0.7 billion of assets where the Residuals are held by a hedge fund that is consolidated and managed by the Company.
The TOB trusts fund the purchase of their assets by issuing Floaters along with Residuals, which are frequently less than 1% of a trust's total funding. The tenor of the Floaters matches the maturity of the TOB trust and is equal to or shorter than the tenor of the municipal bond held by the trust, and the Floaters bear interest rates that are typically reset weekly to a new market rate (based on the SIFMA index)index: a seven day high grade market index of tax exempt, variable rate municipal bonds). Floater holders have an option to tender thetheir Floaters they hold back to the trust periodically. The Floaters have a long-term rating based on the long-term rating of the underlying municipal bond, including any credit enhancement provided by monoline insurance companies, and a short-term rating based on that of the liquidity provider to the trust.
The Company sponsors two kinds of TOB trusts: customer TOB trusts and proprietary TOB trusts. Customer TOB trusts issue the Floaters and Residuals to third parties. Proprietary and QSPE TOBare trusts issue the Floaters to third parties and thethrough which customers finance investments in municipal securities. The Residuals are held by customers, and the Company.
Approximately $3.1 billion of the municipal bonds ownedFloaters by third-party investors. Proprietary TOB trusts have an additional credit guarantee provided by the Company. In all other cases, the assets are either unenhanced or are insured with a monoline insurance provider in the primary market or in the secondary market. While the trusts have not encountered any adverse credit events as defined in the underlying trust agreements, certain monoline insurance companies have experienced downgrades. In these cases,through which the Company has proactively managedfinances its own investments in municipal securities. The Company holds the Residuals in proprietary TOB programs by applying additional secondary market insurance on the assets or proceeding with orderly unwinds of the trusts.
The Company in its capacityserves as remarketing agent facilitatesto the trusts, facilitating the sale of the Floaters to third parties at inception of the trust and facilitatesfacilitating the reset of the Floater coupon and tenders of Floaters. If Floaters are tendered and the Company (in its role as remarketing agent) is unable to find a new investor within a specified period of time, it can declare a failed remarketing (in which case the trust is unwound) or it may choose to buy the Floaters into its own inventory and may continue to try to sell itthem to a third-party investor. While the level of the Company's inventory of Floaters fluctuates, the Company held approximately $0.4 billionnone of the Floater inventory related to the Customer, Proprietary and QSPEcustomer or proprietary TOB programs as of June 30, 2009.2010.
Approximately $1.3 billion of the municipal bonds owned by TOB trusts have a credit guarantee provided by the Company. In all other cases, the assets are either unenhanced or are insured with a monoline insurance company. While the trusts have not encountered any adverse credit events as defined in the underlying trust agreements, certain monoline insurance companies have experienced downgrades. In these cases, the Company has proactively managed the TOB programs by applying additional insurance on the assets or proceeding with orderly unwinds of the trusts.
If a trust is unwound early due to an event other than a credit event on the underlying municipal bond, the underlying municipal bond is sold in the secondary market. If there is an accompanying shortfall in the trust's cash flows to fund the redemption of the Floaters after the sale of the underlying
municipal bond, the trust draws on a liquidity agreement in an amount equal to the shortfall. Liquidity agreements are generally provided to the trust directly by the Company. For customer TOBs where the Residual is less than 25% of the trust's capital structure, the Company has a reimbursement agreement with the Residual holder under which the Residual holder reimburses the Company for any payment made under the liquidity arrangement. Through this reimbursement agreement, the Residual holder remains economically exposed to fluctuations in value of the municipal bond. These reimbursement agreements are actively margined based on changes in value of the underlying municipal bond to mitigate the Company's counterparty credit risk. In cases where a third party provides liquidity to a proprietary or QSPE TOB trust, a similar reimbursement arrangement is made whereby the Company (or a consolidated subsidiary of the Company) as Residual holder absorbs any losses incurred by the liquidity provider. As of June 30, 2009,2010, liquidity agreements provided with respect to customer TOB trusts totaled $6.5$6.3 billion, offset by reimbursement agreements in place with a notional amount of $4.9$4.8 billion. The remaining exposure relates to TOB transactions where the Residual owned by the customer is at least 25% of the bond value at the inception of the transaction.transaction and no reimbursement agreement is executed. In addition, the Company has provided liquidity arrangements with a notional amount of $0.9$0.1 billion to QSPE TOB trusts andfor other non-consolidated proprietary TOB trusts described above.below.
The Company considers the customer and proprietary TOB trusts (excluding QSPE TOB trusts) to be VIEs withinVIEs. Customer TOB trusts were not consolidated by the scopeCompany in prior periods and remain unconsolidated upon the Company's adoption of FIN 46(R) (ASC 810-10-15).SFAS 167. Because third-party investors hold the Residual and Floater interests in the customer TOB trusts, the Company's involvement and variable interests includeincludes only its role as remarketing agent and liquidity provider. OnThe Company has concluded that the basis of the variability absorbedpower over customer TOB trusts is primarily held by the customer throughResidual holder, who may unilaterally cause the reimbursement arrangement or significant residual investment,sale of the trust's bonds. Because the Company does not hold the Residual interest and thus does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the trust's economic performance, it does not consolidate the Customercustomer TOB trusts.trusts under SFAS 167.
Proprietary TOB trusts generally were consolidated in prior periods. They remain consolidated upon the Company's adoption of SFAS 167. The Company's variable interests ininvolvement with the Proprietary TOB trusts includeincludes holding the Residual interests as well as the remarkingremarketing and liquidity agreements with the trusts. On the basis of the variability absorbed through these contracts (primarily the Residual),Similar to customer TOB trusts, the Company generally consolidateshas concluded that the Proprietary TOB trusts. Finally, certainpower over the proprietary TOB trusts is primarily held by the Residual holder, who may unilaterally cause the sale of the trust's bonds. Because the Company holds the Residual interest, and thus has the power to direct
the activities that most significantly impact the trust's economic performance, it continues to consolidate the proprietary TOB trusts under SFAS 167.
Prior to 2010, certain TOB trusts met the definition of a QSPE and were not consolidated in prior periods. Upon the Company's adoption of SFAS 167, former QSPE trusts have been consolidated by the Company as Residual interest holders and are presented as proprietary TOB trusts.
Total assets in proprietary TOB trusts also include $0.7 billion of assets where the Residuals are held by hedge funds that are consolidated and managed by the Company. The assets and the associated liabilities of these TOB trusts are not consolidated by the hedge funds (and, thus, are not consolidated by the Company) under the application of specificASC 946,Financial Services—Investment Companies, which precludes consolidation of owned investments. The Company consolidates the hedge funds, because the Company holds controlling financial interests in the hedge funds. Certain of the Company's equity investments in the hedge funds are hedged with derivatives transactions executed by the Company with third parties referencing the returns of the hedge fund. The Company's accounting literature. Forfor these hedge funds and their interests in the nonconsolidated proprietary TOB trusts and QSPE TOB trusts, the Company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raisedis unchanged by the trusts is off-balance sheet.Company's adoption of SFAS 167.
The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to Citicorp's municipal bond securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
| Three months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.5 | |||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.2 | |||
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | 0.2 | $ | 0.5 | |||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.3 | |||
The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to Citi Holdings' municipal bond securitizations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008:
| Six months ended June 30, | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | 2009 | 2008 | |||||
Proceeds from new securitizations | $ | — | $ | 0.1 | |||
Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows | $ | — | $ | — | |||
Municipal Investments
Municipal investment transactions representare primarily interests in partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing.housing, facilitate lending in new or underserved markets, or finance the construction or operation of renewable municipal energy facilities. The Company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits and grants earned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership. These entities are generally considered VIEs. The power to direct the activities of these entities is typically held by the general partner. Accordingly, these entities have remained unconsolidated by the Company upon adoption of SFAS 167.
Client Intermediation
Client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security, referenced asset or index. These transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes. In these transactions, the SPE typically obtains exposure to the underlying security, referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument, such as a total-return swap or a credit-default swap. In turn the SPE issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security, referenced asset or index. The SPE invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract (GIC) that serves as collateral for the derivative contract over the term of the transaction. The Company's involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the SPE's derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the SPE. In certain
transactions, the investor's maximum risk of loss is limited and the Company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level. The Company does not have the power to direct the activities of the VIEs which most significantly impact their economic performance and thus it does not consolidate them.
The Company's maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the SPE and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the Company through a separate instrument issued by the SPE. The derivative instrument held by the Company may generate a receivable from the SPE (for example, where the Company purchases credit protection from the SPE in connection with the SPE's issuance of a credit-linked note), which is collateralized by the assets owned by the SPE. These derivative instruments are not considered variable interests under FIN 46(R) (ASC 810-10-15) and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the SPE.
Structured Investment Vehicles
Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) are SPEs that issue junior notes and senior debt (medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper) to fund the purchase of high quality assets. The Company acts as manager for the SIVs.
In order to complete the wind-down of the SIVs, the Company purchased the remaining assets of the SIVs in November 2008. The Company funded the purchase of the SIV assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes issued by the SIVs as the medium-term notes mature.
Investment Funds
The Company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity, hedge funds, real estate, fixed income and infrastructure. The Company earns a management fee, which is a percentage of capital under management, and may earn performance fees. In addition, for some of these funds the Company has an ownership interest in the investment funds.
The Company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments. The Company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basisbases for a portion of the employees' investment commitments.
The Company has determined that a majority of the investment vehicles managed by Citigroup are provided a deferral from the requirements of SFAS 167, because they meet the criteria in Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-10,Consolidation (Topic 810), Amendments for Certain Investment Funds (ASU 2010-10) (see Note 1). These vehicles continue to be evaluated under the requirements of ASC 810-10, prior to the implementation of SFAS 167 (FIN 46(R)).
Where the Company has determined that certain investment vehicles are subject to the consolidation requirements of SFAS 167, the consolidation conclusions reached upon initial application of SFAS 167 are consistent with the consolidation conclusions reached under the requirements of ASC 810-10, prior to the implementation of SFAS 167.
Trust Preferred Securities
The Company has raised financing through the issuance of trust preferred securities. In these transactions, the Company forms a statutory business trust and owns all of the voting equity shares of the trust. The trust issues preferred equity securities to third-party investors and invests the gross
proceeds in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued by the Company. These trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration and repayment of the preferred equity securities held by third-party investors. These trusts' obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company.
Because the sole asset of the trust is a receivable from the Company and the proceeds to the Company from the receivable exceed the Company's investment in the VIE's equity shares, the Company is not permitted to consolidate the trusts, under FIN 46(R) (ASC 810-10-15), even though the Company owns all of the voting equity shares of the trust, has fully guaranteed the trusts' obligations, and has the right to redeem the preferred securities in certain circumstances. The Company recognizes the subordinated debentures on its balance sheetConsolidated Balance Sheet as long-term liabilities.
In the ordinary course of business, Citigroup enters into various types of derivative transactions. These derivative transactions include:
Citigroup enters into these derivative contracts relating to interest rate, foreign currency, commodity, and other market/credit risks for the following reasons:
Derivatives may expose Citigroup to market, credit or liquidity risks in excess of the amounts recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Market risk on a derivative product is the exposure created by potential fluctuations in interest rates, foreign-exchange rates and other factors and is a function of the type of product, the volume of transactions, the tenor and terms of the agreement, and the underlying volatility. Credit risk is the exposure to loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the transaction where the value of any collateral held is not adequate to cover such losses. The recognition in earnings of unrealized gains on these transactions is subject to management's assessment as to collectibility.collectability. Liquidity risk is the potential exposure that arises when the size of the derivative position may not be able to be rapidly adjusted in periods of high volatility and financial stress at a reasonable cost.
Information pertaining to the volume of derivative activity is provided in the tables below. The notional amounts, for both long and short derivative positions, of Citigroup's derivative instruments as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are presented in the table below:below.
Derivative Notionals
| Hedging Instruments under SFAS 133 (ASC 815)(1) | Other Derivative Instruments | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars at June 30, 2009 | | Trading Derivatives | Management Hedges(2) | ||||||||
Interest rate contracts | |||||||||||
Swaps | $ | 109,852 | $ | 15,297,418 | $ | 203,874 | |||||
Futures and forwards | — | 3,724,252 | 101,832 | ||||||||
Written options | — | 3,063,580 | 18,850 | ||||||||
Purchased options | — | 3,227,193 | 50,726 | ||||||||
Total interest rate contract notionals | $ | 109,852 | $ | 25,312,443 | $ | 375,282 | |||||
Foreign exchange contracts | |||||||||||
Swaps | $ | 32,546 | $ | 914,889 | $ | 23,096 | |||||
Futures and forwards | 36,651 | 2,030,750 | 7,434 | ||||||||
Written options | 1,624 | 435,498 | 4,849 | ||||||||
Purchased options | 2,474 | 451,971 | — | ||||||||
Total foreign exchange contract notionals | $ | 73,295 | $ | 3,833,108 | $ | 35,379 | |||||
Equity contracts | |||||||||||
Swaps | $ | — | $ | 90,794 | $ | — | |||||
Futures and forwards | — | 13,557 | — | ||||||||
Written options | — | 463,668 | — | ||||||||
Purchased options | — | 442,601 | — | ||||||||
Total equity contract notionals | $ | — | $ | 1,010,620 | $ | — | |||||
Commodity and other contracts | |||||||||||
Swaps | $ | — | $ | 27,451 | $ | — | |||||
Futures and forwards | — | 84,905 | — | ||||||||
Written options | — | 30,663 | — | ||||||||
Purchased options | — | 30,254 | — | ||||||||
Total commodity and other contract notionals | $ | — | $ | 173,273 | $ | — | |||||
Credit derivatives(3) | |||||||||||
Citigroup as the Guarantor | $ | — | $ | 1,365,688 | $ | — | |||||
Citigroup as the Beneficiary | 6,668 | 1,473,598 | — | ||||||||
Total credit derivatives | $ | 6,668 | $ | 2,839,286 | $ | — | |||||
Total derivative notionals | $ | 189,815 | $ | 33,168,730 | $ | 410,661 | |||||
| Hedging instruments under ASC 815 (SFAS 133)(1)(2) | Other derivative instruments | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | Trading derivatives | Management hedges(3) | ||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | ||||||||||||||||||||
Swaps | $ | 155,838 | $ | 128,797 | $ | 25,017,918 | $ | 20,571,814 | $ | 115,879 | $ | 107,193 | ||||||||
Futures and forwards | — | — | 4,884,162 | 3,366,927 | 53,896 | 65,597 | ||||||||||||||
Written options | — | — | 3,370,356 | 3,616,240 | 8,510 | 11,050 | ||||||||||||||
Purchased options | — | — | 3,034,676 | 3,590,032 | 21,720 | 28,725 | ||||||||||||||
Total interest rate contract notionals | $ | 155,838 | $ | 128,797 | $ | 36,307,112 | $ | 31,145,013 | $ | 200,005 | $ | 212,565 | ||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | ||||||||||||||||||||
Swaps | $ | 27,335 | $ | 42,621 | $ | 937,613 | $ | 855,560 | $ | 24,428 | $ | 24,044 | ||||||||
Futures and forwards | 96,204 | 76,507 | 2,138,152 | 1,946,802 | 38,252 | 54,249 | ||||||||||||||
Written options | 1,973 | 4,685 | 527,410 | 409,991 | 2,958 | 9,305 | ||||||||||||||
Purchased options | 10,157 | 22,594 | 503,129 | 387,786 | 3,465 | 10,188 | ||||||||||||||
Total foreign exchange contract notionals | $ | 135,669 | $ | 146,407 | $ | 4,106,304 | $ | 3,600,139 | $ | 69,103 | $ | 97,786 | ||||||||
Equity contracts | ||||||||||||||||||||
Swaps | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 72,298 | $ | 59,391 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Futures and forwards | — | — | 15,839 | 14,627 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Written options | — | — | 533,403 | 410,002 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Purchased options | — | — | 430,167 | 377,961 | — | 275 | ||||||||||||||
Total equity contract notionals | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,051,707 | $ | 861,981 | $ | — | $ | 275 | ||||||||
Commodity and other contracts | ||||||||||||||||||||
Swaps | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 28,410 | $ | 25,956 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Futures and forwards | — | — | 119,638 | 91,582 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Written options | — | — | 51,099 | 37,952 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Purchased options | — | — | 75,468 | 40,321 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||
Total commodity and other contract notionals | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 274,615 | $ | 195,811 | $ | 2 | $ | 3 | ||||||||
Credit derivatives(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Protection sold | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,181,324 | $ | 1,214,053 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Protection purchased | 6,836 | 6,981 | 1,232,277 | 1,325,981 | 51,366 | — | ||||||||||||||
Total credit derivatives | $ | 6,836 | $ | 6,981 | $ | 2,413,601 | $ | 2,540,034 | $ | 51,366 | $ | — | ||||||||
Total derivative notionals | $ | 298,343 | $ | 282,185 | $ | 44,153,339 | $ | 38,342,978 | $ | 320,476 | $ | 310,629 | ||||||||
Derivative Mark-to-Market (MTM) Receivables/Payables
| Derivatives classified in Trading account assets / liabilities(1) | Derivatives classified in Other assets / liabilities | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars at June 30, 2009 | Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | ||||||||||
Derivative instruments designated as SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedges | ||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 584 | $ | 1,705 | $ | 4,096 | $ | 1,207 | ||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 856 | 598 | 2,548 | 3,327 | ||||||||||
Credit derivatives | — | — | 370 | — | ||||||||||
Total derivative instruments designated as SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedges | $ | 1,440 | $ | 2,303 | $ | 7,014 | $ | 4,534 | ||||||
Other derivative instruments | ||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 486,039 | $ | 464,981 | $ | 3,751 | $ | 5,812 | ||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 86,957 | 91,643 | 850 | 679 | ||||||||||
Equity contracts | 24,444 | 45,070 | — | — | ||||||||||
Commodity and other contracts | 21,331 | 20,447 | — | — | ||||||||||
Credit derivatives | 150,658 | 133,344 | — | — | ||||||||||
Total other derivative instruments | $ | 769,429 | $ | 755,485 | $ | 4,601 | $ | 6,491 | ||||||
Total derivatives | $ | 770,869 | $ | 757,788 | $ | 11,615 | $ | 11,025 | ||||||
Cash collateral paid/received | 55,356 | 51,227 | 707 | 2,943 | ||||||||||
Less: Netting agreements and market value adjustments | (753,067 | ) | (745,467 | ) | (3,650 | ) | (3,650 | ) | ||||||
Net receivables/ payables | $ | 73,158 | $ | 63,548 | $ | 8,672 | $ | 10,318 | ||||||
| Derivatives classified in trading account assets/liabilities(1) | Derivatives classified in other assets/liabilities | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars at June 30, 2010 | Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||
Derivative instruments designated as ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedges | |||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 826 | $ | 99 | $ | 7,308 | $ | 2,366 | |||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 1,737 | 231 | 1,582 | 3,058 | |||||||||
Total derivative instruments designated as ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedges | $ | 2,563 | $ | 330 | $ | 8,890 | $ | 5,424 | |||||
Other derivative instruments | |||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 589,370 | $ | 583,964 | $ | 3,154 | $ | 3,034 | |||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 80,421 | 85,219 | 1,042 | 2,052 | |||||||||
Equity contracts | 20,426 | 38,337 | — | — | |||||||||
Commodity and other contracts | 12,999 | 13,107 | — | — | |||||||||
Credit derivatives(2) | 84,987 | 77,390 | 467 | 277 | |||||||||
Total other derivative instruments | $ | 788,203 | $ | 798,017 | $ | 4,663 | $ | 5,363 | |||||
Total derivatives | $ | 790,766 | $ | 798,347 | $ | 13,553 | $ | 10,787 | |||||
Cash collateral paid/received | 49,035 | 39,216 | 619 | 5,012 | |||||||||
Less: Netting agreements and market value adjustments | (783,280 | ) | (778,290 | ) | (1,576 | ) | (1,576 | ) | |||||
Net receivables/payables | $ | 56,521 | $ | 59,273 | $ | 12,596 | $ | 14,223 | |||||
| Derivatives classified in trading account assets/liabilities(1) | Derivatives classified in other assets/liabilities | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars at December 31, 2009 | Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||
Derivative instruments designated as ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedges | |||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 304 | $ | 87 | $ | 4,267 | $ | 2,898 | |||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 753 | 1,580 | 3,599 | 1,416 | |||||||||
Total derivative instruments designated as ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedges | $ | 1,057 | $ | 1,667 | $ | 7,866 | $ | 4,314 | |||||
Other derivative instruments | |||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 454,974 | $ | 449,551 | $ | 2,882 | $ | 3,022 | |||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 71,005 | 70,584 | 1,498 | 2,381 | |||||||||
Equity contracts | 18,132 | 40,612 | 6 | 5 | |||||||||
Commodity and other contracts | 16,698 | 15,492 | — | — | |||||||||
Credit derivatives(2) | 92,792 | 82,424 | — | — | |||||||||
Total other derivative instruments | $ | 653,601 | $ | 658,663 | $ | 4,386 | $ | 5,408 | |||||
Total derivatives | $ | 654,658 | $ | 660,330 | $ | 12,252 | $ | 9,722 | |||||
Cash collateral paid/received | 48,561 | 38,611 | 263 | 4,950 | |||||||||
Less: Netting agreements and market value adjustments | (644,340 | ) | (634,835 | ) | (4,224 | ) | (4,224 | ) | |||||
Net receivables/payables | $ | 58,879 | $ | 64,106 | $ | 8,291 | $ | 10,448 | |||||
All derivatives are reported on the balance sheet at fair value. In addition, where applicable, all such contracts covered by master netting agreements are reported net. Gross positive fair values are netted with gross negative fair values by counterparty pursuant to a valid master netting agreement. In addition, payables and receivables in respect of cash collateral received from or paid to a given counterparty are included in this netting. However, non-cash collateral is not included.
As of June 30, 2009 theThe amount of payables in respect of cash collateral received that was netted with unrealized gains from derivatives was $40$36 billion while theand $30 billion as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The amount of receivables in respect of cash collateral paid that was netted with unrealized losses from derivatives was $50 billion.$41 billion as of June 30, 2010 as well as December 31, 2009.
The amounts recognized inPrincipal transactionsin the Consolidated Statement of Income for the quarterthree and six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 related to derivatives not designated in a qualifying SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedging relationship as well as the underlying non-derivative instruments are shownincluded in the table below:below. Citigroup has elected to present this disclosure by business classification, showing derivative gains and losses related to its trading activities together with gains and losses related to non-derivative instruments within the same trading portfolios, as this better represents the way these portfolios are risk managed.
| Non-designated derivatives(1)—gains (losses) Three months ended June 30, 2009 | Non-designated derivatives(1)—gains (losses) Six months ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Principal transactions | Other revenues | Principal transactions | Other revenues | ||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | (237 | ) | $ | 192 | $ | (2,583 | ) | $ | 420 | ||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 1,797 | (3,362 | ) | 2,047 | (2,366 | ) | ||||||||
Equity contracts | 674 | — | 589 | — | ||||||||||
Commodity and other contracts | (103 | ) | — | 234 | — | |||||||||
Credit derivatives | (98 | ) | — | 240 | — | |||||||||
Total gain (loss) on non-designated derivatives(1) | $ | 2,033 | $ | (3,170 | ) | $ | 527 | $ | (1,946 | ) | ||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 2,231 | $ | 1,613 | $ | 3,642 | $ | 6,453 | |||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 262 | 858 | 503 | 1,864 | |||||||||
Equity contracts | (250 | ) | (175 | ) | 315 | 903 | |||||||
Commodity and other contracts | 121 | 130 | 230 | 827 | |||||||||
Credit derivatives | (147 | ) | (638 | ) | 1,680 | (4,346 | ) | ||||||
Total Citigroup(1) | $ | 2,217 | $ | 1,788 | $ | 6,370 | $ | 5,701 | |||||
The amounts recognized inOther revenuein the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 relate to derivatives not designated in a qualifying hedging relationship and not recorded withinTrading account assetsorTrading account liabilitiesare shown below. The table below does not include the offsetting gains/losses on the hedged items, which amounts are also recorded inOther revenue.
| Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | (205 | ) | $ | (460 | ) | $ | (299 | ) | $ | (449 | ) | |
Foreign exchange contracts | (3,008 | ) | 3,464 | (5,825 | ) | 2,468 | |||||||
Equity contracts | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Commodity and other contracts | — | — | — | — | |||||||||
Credit derivatives | 141 | — | 141 | — | |||||||||
Total Citigroup(1) | $ | (3,072 | ) | $ | 3,004 | $ | (5,983 | ) | $ | 2,019 | |||
Accounting for Derivative Hedging
Citigroup accounts for its hedging activities in accordance with ASC 815,Derivatives and Hedging(formerly SFAS 133 (ASC 815)133). As a general rule, SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedge accounting is permitted for those situations where the Company is exposed to a particular risk, such as interest-rate or foreign-exchange risk, that causes changes in the fair value of an asset or liability or variability in the expected future cash flows of an existing asset, liability or a forecasted transaction that may affect earnings.
Derivative contracts hedging the risks associated with the changes in fair value are referred to as fair value hedges, while contracts hedging the risks affecting the expected future cash flows are called cash flow hedges. Hedges that utilize derivatives or debt instruments to manage the foreign exchange risk associated with equity investments in non-U.S. dollarnon-U.S.-dollar functional currency foreign subsidiaries (net investment in a foreign operation) are called net investment hedges.
If certain hedging criteria specified in SFAS 133 (ASC 815)ASC 815 are met, including testing for hedge effectiveness, special hedge accounting may be applied. The hedge effectiveness assessment methodologies for similar hedges are performed in a similar manner and are used consistently throughout the hedging relationships. For fair value hedges, the changes in value of the hedging derivative, as well as the changes in
value of the related hedged item due to the risk being hedged, are reflected in current earnings. For cash flow hedges and net investment hedges, the changes in value of the hedging derivative are reflected inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss)in Citigroup's stockholders' equity, to the extent the hedge is effective. Hedge ineffectiveness, in either case, is reflected in current earnings.
For asset/liability management hedging, the fixed-rate long-term debt may be recorded at amortized cost under current U.S. GAAP. However, by electing to use SFAS 133 (ASC 815)ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedge accounting, the carrying value of the debt is adjusted for changes in the benchmark interest rate, with any such changes in value recorded in current earnings. The related interest-rate swap is also recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with any changes in fair value reflected in earnings. Thus, any ineffectiveness resulting from the hedging relationship is recorded in current earnings. Alternatively, an economic hedge, which does not meet the SFAS 133 (ASC 815)ASC 815 hedging criteria, would involve recording only recording the derivative at fair value on the balance sheet, with its associated changes in fair value recorded in earnings. The debt would continue to be carried at amortized cost and, therefore, current earnings would be impacted only by the interest rate shifts and other factors that cause the change in the swap's value and the underlying yield of the debt. This type of hedge is undertaken when SFAS 133 (ASC 815) hedgehedging requirements cannot be achieved or management decides not to apply SFAS 133 (ASC 815)ASC 815 hedge accounting. Another alternative for the Company would be to elect to carry the debt at fair value under SFAS 159 (ASC 825-10).the fair value option. Once the irrevocable election is made upon issuance of the debt, the full change in fair value of the debt would be reported in earnings. The related interest rate swap, with changes in fair value, would also be reflected in earnings, and provides a natural offset to the debt's fair value change. To the extent the two offsets would not be exactly equal, the difference would be reflected in current earnings. This type of economic hedge is undertaken when the Company prefers to follow this simpler method that achieves generally similar financial statement results to an SFAS 133 (ASC 815) fair-valueASC 815 fair value hedge.
Key aspects of achieving SFAS 133 (ASC 815)ASC 815 hedge accounting are documentation of hedging strategy and hedge effectiveness at the hedge inception and substantiating hedge effectiveness on an ongoing basis. A derivative must be highly effective in
accomplishing the hedge objective of offsetting either changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item for the risk being hedged. Any ineffectiveness in the hedge relationship is recognized in current earnings. The assessment of effectiveness excludes changes in the value of the hedged item that are unrelated to the risks being hedged. Similarly, the assessment of effectiveness may exclude changes in the fair value of a derivative related to time value that, if excluded, are recognized in current earnings.
Fair value hedgesValue Hedges
Hedging of benchmark interest rate risk
Citigroup hedges exposure to changes in the fair value of outstanding fixed-rate issued debt and borrowings.certificate of deposit. The fixed cash flows from those financing transactions are converted to benchmark variable-rate cash flows by entering into receive fixed,receive-fixed, pay-variable interest rate swaps. These fair-valueMost of these fair value hedge relationships use dollar-offset ratio analysis to determine whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis.basis, while others use regression.
Citigroup also hedges exposure to changes in the fair value of fixed-rate assets, including available-for-sale debt securities and loans. The hedging instruments used are receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swaps. Most of these fair-valuefair value hedging relationships use dollar-offset ratio analysis to determine whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis, while certain others use regression analysis.
Hedging of foreign exchange risk
Citigroup hedges the change in fair value attributable to foreign-exchange rate movements in available-for-sale securities that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity holding the securities, which may be within or outside the U.S. The hedging instrument employed is a forward foreign-exchange contract. In this type of hedge, the change in fair value of the hedged available-for-sale security attributable to the portion of foreign exchange risk hedged is reported in earnings and notAccumulated other comprehensive income—income—a process that serves to offset substantially the change in fair value of the forward contract that is also reflected in earnings. Citigroup considers the premium associated with forward contracts (differential between spot and contractual forward rates) as the cost of hedging; this is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and reflected directly in earnings. Dollar-offset method is used to assess hedge effectiveness. Since that assessment is based on changes in fair value attributable to changes in spot rates on both the available-for-sale securities and the forward contracts for the portion of the relationship hedged, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant.
The following table summarizes certain information related tothe gains (losses) on the Company's fair value hedges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009:
| Three months ended June 30, 2009 | Six months ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Principal Transactions | Other Revenue | Principal Transactions | Other Revenue | ||||||||||
Gain (loss) on fair value designated and qualifying hedges | ||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 509 | $ | (3,687 | ) | $ | 965 | $ | (5,886 | ) | ||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 1,186 | 467 | 1,303 | 322 | ||||||||||
Total gain (loss) on fair value designated and qualifying hedges | $ | 1,695 | $ | (3,220 | ) | $ | 2,268 | $ | (5,564 | ) | ||||
Gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges | ||||||||||||||
Interest rate hedges | $ | (593 | ) | $ | 3,546 | $ | (1,042 | ) | $ | 5,990 | ||||
Foreign exchange hedges | (1,306 | ) | (571 | ) | (1,151 | ) | (283 | ) | ||||||
Total gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedge | $ | (1,899 | ) | $ | 2,975 | $ | (2,193 | ) | $ | 5,707 | ||||
Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges | ||||||||||||||
Interest rate hedges | $ | 50 | $ | (170 | ) | $ | 131 | $ | 85 | |||||
Foreign exchange hedges | (3 | ) | (105 | ) | 8 | 32 | ||||||||
Total hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges | $ | 47 | $ | (275 | ) | $ | 139 | $ | 117 | |||||
Net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges | ||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | (134 | ) | $ | 29 | $ | (208 | ) | $ | 19 | ||||
Foreign exchange contracts | (117 | ) | 1 | 144 | 7 | |||||||||
Total net gain / (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges | $ | (251 | ) | $ | 30 | $ | (64 | ) | $ | 26 | ||||
| Gains (losses) on fair value hedges(1) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months ended June 30, | Six Months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on fair value designated and qualifying hedges | |||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 1,509 | $ | (3,178 | ) | $ | 2,342 | $ | (4,921 | ) | |||
Foreign exchange contracts | 1,916 | 1,653 | 1,674 | 1,625 | |||||||||
Total gain (loss) on fair value designated and qualifying hedges | $ | 3,425 | $ | (1,525 | ) | $ | 4,016 | $ | (3,296 | ) | |||
Gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges | |||||||||||||
Interest rate hedges | $ | (1,543 | ) | $ | 2,953 | $ | (2,448 | ) | $ | 4,948 | |||
Foreign exchange hedges | (1,860 | ) | (1,877 | ) | (1,591 | ) | (1,434 | ) | |||||
Total gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges | $ | (3,403 | ) | $ | 1,076 | $ | (4,039 | ) | $ | 3,514 | |||
Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges | |||||||||||||
Interest rate hedges | $ | 8 | $ | (120 | ) | $ | (67 | ) | $ | 216 | |||
Foreign exchange hedges | 25 | (108 | ) | 26 | 40 | ||||||||
Total hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges | $ | 33 | $ | (228 | ) | $ | (41 | ) | $ | 256 | |||
Net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges | |||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | (42 | ) | $ | (105 | ) | $ | (39 | ) | $ | (189 | ) | |
Foreign exchange contracts | 31 | (116 | ) | 57 | 151 | ||||||||
Total net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges | $ | (11 | ) | $ | (221 | ) | $ | 18 | $ | (38 | ) | ||
Cash flow hedgesFlow Hedges
Hedging of benchmark interest rate risk
Citigroup hedges variable cash flows resulting from floating-rate liabilities and roll overroll-over (re-issuance) of short-term liabilities. Variable cash flows from those liabilities are converted to fixed-rate cash flows by entering into receive-variable, pay-fixed interest-rate swaps and receive-variable, pay-fixed forward-starting interest-rate swaps. For some hedges, the hedge ineffectiveness is eliminated by matching all terms of the hedged item and the hedging derivative at inception and on an ongoing basis. Citigroup does not exclude any terms from consideration when applying the matched terms method. To the extent all terms are not perfectly matched, theseThese cash-flow hedging relationships use either regression analysis or dollar-offset ratio analysis to assess whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis. Since efforts are made to match the terms of the derivatives to those of the hedged forecasted cash flows as closely as possible, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant even when the terms do not match perfectly.significant.
Hedging of foreign exchange risk
Citigroup locks in the functional currency equivalent of cash flows of various balance sheet liability exposures, including short-term borrowings and long-term debt (and the forecasted issuances or rollover of such items) that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the issuing entity. Depending on the risk-management objectives, these types of hedges are designated as either cash-flow hedges of only foreign exchange risk or cash-flow hedges of both foreign-exchange and interest rate risk, and the hedging instruments used are foreign-exchange forward contracts, cross-currency swaps and foreign-currency options. For some hedges, Citigroup matches all terms of the hedged item and the hedging derivative at inception and on an ongoing basis to eliminate hedge ineffectiveness. Citigroup does not exclude any terms from consideration when applying the matched terms method. To the extent all terms are not perfectly matched, any ineffectiveness is measured using the "hypothetical derivative method" from FASB Derivative Implementation Group Issue G7(G7 (now ASC 815-30-35-12 through 35-32). Efforts are made to match up the terms of the hypothetical and actual derivatives used as closely as possible. As a result, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant even when the terms do not match perfectly.
Hedging total return
Citigroup generally manages the risk associated with highly leveraged financing it has entered into by seeking to sell a majority of its exposures to the market prior to or shortly after funding. The portion of the highly leveraged financing that is retained by Citigroup is hedged with a total return swap.
The amount of hedge ineffectiveness on the cash flow hedges recognized in earnings totals $5 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and $9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
The pretax change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from cash flow hedges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 is presented below:not significant.
In millions of dollars | Three months ended June 30, 2009 | Six months ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI | ||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 402 | $ | 570 | ||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 233 | 633 | ||||||
Credit derivatives | (1,135 | ) | 358 | |||||
Total Effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI | $ | (500 | ) | $ | 1,561 | |||
Effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to Earnings | ||||||||
Interest rate contracts(1) | $ | (445 | ) | $ | (857 | ) | ||
Foreign exchange contracts(2) | (65 | ) | 21 | |||||
Credit derivatives | — | — | ||||||
Total effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to Earnings | $ | (510 | ) | $ | (836 | ) | ||
The amount reclassifiedpretax change inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from AOCI, related to interest rate cash flow hedges to Other revenuefor three and Principal transactions is ($395) million and ($50) million, respectively for the three months ended June 30, 2009, and ($762) million and ($95)million for the six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
| Three Months ended June 30, | Six Months ended June 30, | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI | |||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | (384 | ) | $ | 402 | $ | (625 | ) | $ | 570 | |||
Foreign exchange contracts | (398 | ) | 233 | (389 | ) | 633 | |||||||
Credit Derivatives | — | (1,135 | ) | — | 358 | ||||||||
Total effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI | $ | (782 | ) | $ | (500 | ) | $ | (1,014 | ) | $ | 1,561 | ||
Effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to earnings | |||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | (364 | ) | $ | (445 | ) | $ | (734 | ) | $ | (857 | ) | ||
Foreign exchange contracts | (103 | ) | (65 | ) | (281 | ) | 21 | ||||||
Total effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to earnings(1) | $ | (467 | ) | $ | (510 | ) | $ | (1,015 | ) | $ | (836 | ) | |
For cash flow hedges, any changes in the fair value of the end-user derivative remaining inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet will be included in earnings of future periods to offset the variability of the hedged cash flows when such cash flows affect earnings. The net loss associated with cash flow hedges expected to be reclassified fromAccumulated other comprehensive income within 12 months of June 30, 20092010 is approximately $2$1.5 billion. The maximum length of time over which forecasted cash flows are hedged is 10 years.
The impact of cash flow hedges on AOCI is also included withinshown in Note 1413 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Changes in Accumulated Comprehensive Income (Loss).Statements.
Net investment hedgesInvestment Hedges
Consistent with ASC 830-20,Foreign Currency Matters—Foreign Currency Transactions (formerly SFAS No. 52,Foreign Currency TranslationTranslation) (SFAS 52/, ASC 830-20-35-5), SFAS 133 (ASC 815-20-25-58)815 allows hedging of the foreign-currency risk of a net investment in a foreign operation. Citigroup uses foreign-currency forwards, options and swaps and foreign-currency-denominated debt instruments to manage the foreign-exchange risk associated with Citigroup's equity investments in several non-U.S. dollar functional currency foreign subsidiaries. In accordance with SFAS 52(ASC 830-30-50-1), Citigroup records the change in the carrying amount of these investments in theCumulative translation adjustment account withinAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Simultaneously, the effective portion of the hedge of this exposure is also recorded in theCumulative translation adjustment account and the ineffective portion, if any, is immediately recorded in earnings.
For derivatives used in net investment hedges, Citigroup follows the forward-rate method from FASB Derivative Implementation Group Issue H8 (ASC(now ASC 815-35-35-16 through 35-26), "Foreign Currency Hedges: Measuring the Amount of Ineffectiveness in a Net Investment Hedge." According to that method, all changes in fair value, including changes related to the forward-rate component of the foreign-currency forward contracts and the time-value of foreign-currency options, are recorded in the foreign currency.
Cumulative translation adjustment account.account. For foreign-currency denominated debt instruments that are designated as hedges of net investments, the translation gain or loss that is recorded in the cumulativeforeign-currency translation adjustment account is based on the spot exchange rate between the functional currency of the respective subsidiary and the U.S. dollar, which is the functional currency of Citigroup. To the extent the notional amount of the hedging instrument exactly matches the hedged net investment and the underlying exchange rate of the derivative hedging instrument relates to the exchange rate between the functional currency of the net investment and Citigroup's functional currency (or, in the case of a non-derivative debt instrument, such instrument is denominated in the functional currency of the net investment), no ineffectiveness is recorded in earnings.
The following table summarizes certain informationpretax gain (loss) recorded in foreign-currency translation adjustment withinAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss), related to the Company'seffective portion of the net investment hedges, is $666 million and $476 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009:
Net Investments Hedges(1) In millions of dollars | Three months ended June 30, 2009 | Six months ended June 30, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pretax gain (loss) included in FX translation adjustment with AOCI | $ | (3,451 | ) | $ | (2,912 | ) | |
Gain (loss) on hedge ineffectiveness on net investment hedges included in Other revenue | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 4 | ||
Credit Derivatives
A credit derivative is a bilateral contract between a buyer and a seller under which the seller agrees to provide protection to the buyer against the credit risk of a particular entity ("reference entity" or "reference credit"). Credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of predefined credit events (commonly referred to as "settlement triggers"). These settlement triggers are defined by the form of the derivative and the reference credit and are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy of the reference credit and, in a more limited range of transactions, debt restructuring. Credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium. In certain transactions,
protection may be provided on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities. The seller of such protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount.
The Company makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives, both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account. Through these contracts, the Company either purchases or writes protection on either a single name or a portfolio of reference credits. The Company uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate and consumer loan portfolioportfolios and other cash positions, to take proprietary trading positions, and to facilitate client transactions.
The range of credit derivatives sold includes credit default swaps, total return swaps and credit options.
A credit default swap is a contract in which, for a fee, a protection seller (guarantor) agrees to reimburse a protection buyer (beneficiary) for any losses that occur due to a credit event on a reference entity. If there is no credit default event or settlement trigger, as defined by the specific derivative contract, then the guarantorprotection seller makes no payments to the beneficiaryprotection buyer and receives only the contractually specified fee. However, if a credit event occurs as defined in the specific derivative contract sold, the guarantorprotection seller will be required to make a payment to the beneficiary.protection buyer.
A total return swap transfers the total economic performance of a reference asset, which includes all associated cash flows, as well as capital appreciation or depreciation. The protection buyer (beneficiary) receives a floating rate of interest and any depreciation on the reference asset from the protection seller (guarantor) and, in return, the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference asset plus any appreciation. Thus, according to the total return swap agreement, the beneficiaryprotection seller will be obligated to make a payment any timeanytime the floating interest rate payment and any depreciation of the reference asset exceed the cash flows associated with the underlying asset. A total return swap may terminate upon a default of the reference asset subject to the provisions of the related total return swap agreement between the protection seller (guarantor) and the protection buyer (beneficiary).buyer.
A credit option is a credit derivative that allows investors to trade or hedge changes in the credit quality of the reference asset. For example, in a credit spread option, the option writer (guarantor) assumes the obligation to purchase or sell the reference asset at a specified "strike" spread level. The option purchaser (beneficiary) buys the right to sell the reference asset to, or purchase it from, the option writer at the strike spread level. The payments on credit spread options depend either on a particular credit spread or the price of the underlying credit-sensitive asset. The options usually terminate if the underlying assets default.
A credit-linked note is a form of credit derivative structured as a debt security with an embedded credit default swap. The purchaser of the note writes credit protection to the issuer, and receives a return which will be negatively affected by credit events on the underlying reference credit. If the reference entity defaults, the purchaser of the credit-linked note may assume the long position in the debt security and any future cash flows from it, but will lose the amount paid to the issuer of the credit-linked note. Thus the maximum amount of the exposure is the carrying amount of the credit-linked note. As of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the amount of credit-linked notes held by the Company in trading inventory was immaterial.
The following tables summarize the key characteristics of the Company's credit derivative portfolio as protection seller (guarantor) as of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:
In millions of dollars as of June 30, 2009 | Maximum potential amount of future payments | Fair value payable | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
By industry/counterparty | |||||||
Bank | $ | 899,598 | $ | 71,253 | |||
Broker-dealer | 322,349 | 30,798 | |||||
Monoline | 123 | 89 | |||||
Non-financial | 4,805 | 231 | |||||
Insurance and other financial institutions | 138,813 | 14,756 | |||||
Total by industry/counterparty | $ | 1,365,688 | $ | 117,127 | |||
By instrument: | |||||||
Credit default swaps and options | $ | 1,363,738 | $ | 116,600 | |||
Total return swaps and other | 1,950 | 527 | |||||
Total by instrument | $ | 1,365,688 | $ | 117,127 | |||
By rating: | |||||||
Investment grade | $ | 813,892 | 49,503 | ||||
Non-investment grade | 342,888 | 46,242 | |||||
Not rated | 208,908 | 21,382 | |||||
Total by rating | $ | 1,365,688 | $ | 117,127 | |||
In millions of dollars as of December 31, 2008 | Maximum potential amount of future payments | Fair value payable | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
By industry/counterparty | |||||||
Bank | $ | 943,949 | $ | 118,428 | |||
Broker-dealer | 365,664 | 55,458 | |||||
Monoline | 139 | 91 | |||||
Non-financial | 7,540 | 2,556 | |||||
Insurance and other financial institutions | 125,988 | 21,700 | |||||
Total by industry/counterparty | $ | 1,443,280 | $ | 198,233 | |||
By instrument: | |||||||
Credit default swaps and options | $ | 1,441,375 | $ | 197,981 | |||
Total return swaps and other | 1,905 | 252 | |||||
Total by instrument | $ | 1,443,280 | $ | 198,233 | |||
By rating: | |||||||
Investment grade | $ | 851,426 | $ | 83,672 | |||
Non-investment grade | 410,483 | 87,508 | |||||
Not rated | 181,371 | 27,053 | |||||
Total by rating | $ | 1,443,280 | $ | 198,233 | |||
In millions of dollars as of June 30, 2010 | Maximum potential amount of future payments | Fair value payable(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
By industry/counterparty | |||||||
Bank | $ | 772,889 | $ | 37,164 | |||
Broker-dealer | 298,884 | 16,649 | |||||
Non-financial | 368 | 50 | |||||
Insurance and other financial institutions | 109,183 | 7,924 | |||||
Total by industry/counterparty | $ | 1,181,324 | $ | 61,787 | |||
By instrument | |||||||
Credit default swaps and options | $ | 1,180,087 | $ | 61,612 | |||
Total return swaps and other | 1,237 | 175 | |||||
Total by instrument | $ | 1,181,324 | $ | 61,787 | |||
By rating | |||||||
Investment grade | $ | 526,043 | 11,143 | ||||
Non-investment grade | 543,407 | 38,857 | |||||
Not rated | 111,874 | 11,787 | |||||
Total by rating | $ | 1,181,324 | $ | 61,787 | |||
By maturity: | |||||||
Within 1 year | $ | 137,914 | $ | 1,291 | |||
From 1 to 5 years | 832,146 | 33,800 | |||||
After 5 years | 211,264 | 26,696 | |||||
Total by maturity | $ | 1,181,324 | $ | 61,787 | |||
In millions of dollars as of December 31, 2009 | Maximum potential amount of future payments | Fair value payable(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
By industry/counterparty | |||||||
Bank | $ | 807,484 | $ | 34,666 | |||
Broker-dealer | 340,949 | 16,309 | |||||
Monoline | 33 | — | |||||
Non-financial | 623 | 262 | |||||
Insurance and other financial institutions | 64,964 | 7,025 | |||||
Total by industry/counterparty | $ | 1,214,053 | $ | 58,262 | |||
By instrument | |||||||
Credit default swaps and options | $ | 1,213,208 | $ | 57,987 | |||
Total return swaps and other | 845 | 275 | |||||
Total by instrument | $ | 1,214,053 | $ | 58,262 | |||
By rating | |||||||
Investment grade | $ | 576,930 | 9,632 | ||||
Non-investment grade | 339,920 | 28,664 | |||||
Not rated | 297,203 | 19,966 | |||||
Total by rating | $ | 1,214,053 | $ | 58,262 | |||
By maturity: | |||||||
Within 1 year | $ | 165,056 | $ | 873 | |||
From 1 to 5 years | 806,143 | 30,181 | |||||
After 5 years | 242,854 | 27,208 | |||||
Total by maturity | $ | 1,214,053 | $ | 58,262 | |||
Citigroup evaluates the payment/performance risk of the credit derivatives to which it stands as guarantora protection seller based on the credit rating which has been assigned to the underlying referenced credit. Where external ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (such as Moody's and S&P), are used, investment grade ratings are considered to be Baa/BBB or above, while anything below is considered non-investment grade. The Citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external credit rating system. On certain underlying referenced credit,reference credits, mainly related to over-the-counter credit derivatives, ratings are not available, and these are included in the not-rated category. Credit derivatives written on an underlying non-investment grade referencedreference credit represent greater payment risk to the Company. The non-investment grade category in the table above primarily
includes credit derivatives where the underlying referenced entity has been downgraded subsequent to the inception of the derivative.
The maximum potential amount of future payments under credit derivative contracts presented in the table above is based on the notional value of the derivatives. The Company believes that the maximum potential amount of future payments for credit protection sold is not representative of the actual loss exposure based on historical experience. This amount has not been reduced by the Company's rights to the underlying assets and the related cash flows. In accordance with most credit derivative contracts, should a credit event (or settlement trigger) occur, the Company is usually liable for the difference between the protection sold and the recourse it holds in the value of the underlying assets. Thus, if the reference entity defaults, Citi will generally have a right to collect on the underlying reference credit and any related cash flows, while being liable for the full notional amount of credit protection sold to the buyer. Furthermore, this maximum potential amount of future payments for credit protection sold has not been reduced for any cash collateral paid to a given counterparty, as such payments would be calculated after netting all derivative exposures, including any credit derivatives with that counterparty in accordance with a related master netting agreement. Due to such netting processes, determining the amount of collateral that corresponds to credit derivative exposures only is not possible. The Company actively monitors open credit risk exposures, and manages this exposure by using a variety of strategies including purchased credit derivatives, cash collateral or direct holdings of the referenced assets. This risk mitigation activity is not captured in the table above.
Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features in Derivatives
Certain derivative instruments contain provisions that require the Company to either post additional collateral or immediately settle any outstanding liability balances upon the occurrence of a specified credit risk-relatedcredit-risk-related event. These events, which are defined by the existing derivative contracts, are primarily downgrades in the credit ratings of the Company and its affiliates. The fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a liability position at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is $20 billion.$28 billion and $17 billion, respectively. The Company has posted $14$21 billion and $11 billion as collateral for this exposure in the normal course of business as of June 30, 2009.2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Each downgrade would trigger additional collateral requirements for the Company and its affiliates. However, inIn the event that each legal entity was downgraded to below investment grade credit ratinga single notch as of June 30, 2009,2010, the Company would be required to post additional collateral of up to $3$2.1 billion.
17. FAIR-VALUE
16. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT (SFAS 157/ASC 820-10)
Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted SFAS 157(ASC 820-10). SFAS 157(157 (now ASC 820-10) defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair-valuefair value measurements. SFAS 157(ASC 820-10), amongAmong other things, the standard requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. In addition, SFAS 157(ASC 820-10)it precludes the use of block discounts when measuring the fair value of instruments traded in an active market; such discounts were previously applied to large holdings of publicly traded equity securities. It alsomarket, and requires recognition of trade-date gains related to certain derivative transactions whose fair value has been determined using unobservable market inputs.
This guidance supersedes the guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-3, "Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities" (EITF Issue 02-3), which prohibited the recognition of trade-date gains for such derivative transactions when determining the fair value of instruments not traded in an active market.
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 157(ASC 820-10), the Company made some amendments to the techniques used in measuring the fair value of derivative and other positions. These amendments change the waystandard also requires that the probability of default of a counterparty is factored into the valuation of derivative positions, include for the first time the impact of Citigroup's own credit risk on derivatives and other liabilities measured at fair value and also eliminatebe factored into the portfolio servicing adjustment that is no longer necessary under SFAS 157(ASC 820-10).valuation.
Fair-ValueFair Value Hierarchy
SFAS 157(ASC 820-10-35-37 to 35-55)820-10 specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company's market assumptions. These two types of inputs have created the following fair-value hierarchy:
This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. The Company considers relevant and observable market prices in its valuations where possible. The frequency of transactions, the size of the bid-ask spread and the amount of adjustment necessary when comparing similar transactions are all factors in determining the liquidity of markets and the relevance of observed prices in those markets.
The Company's policy with respect to transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy is to recognize transfers into and out of each level as of the end of the reporting period.
Determination of Fair Value
For assets and liabilities carried at fair value, the Company measures such value using the procedures set out below, irrespective of whether these assets and liabilities are carried at fair value as a result of an election under SFAS 159 (ASC 825-10-4 through 25-5), FASB Statement No. 155,Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments (SFAS 155/ASC 815-15-25-4 through 25-5), or FASB Statement No. 156,Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets (SFAS 156/ASC 860-50-35), or whether they were previously carried at fair value.
When available, the Company generally uses quoted market prices to determine fair value and classifies such items inas Level 1. In some cases where a market price is available, the Company will make use of acceptable practical expedients (such as matrix pricing) to calculate fair value, in which case the items are classified inas Level 2.
If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed valuation techniques that use, where possible, current market-based or independently sourced market parameters, such as interest rates, currency rates, option volatilities, etc. Items valued using such internally generated valuation techniques are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation. Thus, an item may be classified in Level 3 even though there may be some significant inputs that are readily observable.
Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in positions with the same or similar characteristics to that being valued. The frequency and size of transactions and the amount of the bid-ask spread are among the factors considered in determining the liquidity of markets and the relevance of observed prices from those markets. If relevant and observable prices are available, those valuations would be classified as Level 2. If prices are not available, other valuation techniques would be used and the item would be classified as Level 3.
Fair-valueFair value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors or brokers. Vendors and brokers' valuations may be based on a variety of inputs ranging from observed prices to proprietary valuation models.
The following section describes the valuation methodologies used by the Company to measure various financial instruments at fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair-valuefair value hierarchy in which each instrument is generally classified. Where appropriate, the description includes details of the valuation models, the key inputs to those models as well as any significant assumptions.
Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
No quoted prices exist for such instruments and so fair value is determined using a discounted cash-flow technique. Cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the contract, taking into account any embedded derivative or other features. Expected cash flows are discounted using market rates appropriate to the maturity of the instrument as well as the nature and amount of collateral taken or received. Generally, such instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy as the inputs used in the fair valuation are readily observable.
Trading Account Assetsaccount assets and Liabilities—Trading Securitiesliabilities—trading securities and Trading Loanstrading loans
When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine the fair value of trading securities; such items are classified inas Level 1 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy. Examples include some government securities and exchange-traded equity securities.
For bonds and secondary market loans traded over the counter, the Company generally determines fair value utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair-valueFair value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources and may apply matrix pricing for similar bonds or loans where no price is observable. If available, the Company may also use quoted prices for recent trading activity of assets with similar characteristics to the bond or loan being valued. Trading securities and loans priced using such methods are generally classified as Level 2. However, when less liquidity exists for a security or loan, a quoted price is stale or prices from independent sources vary, a loan or security is generally classified as Level 3.
Where the Company's principal market for a portfolio of loans is the securitization market, the Company uses the securitization price to determine the fair value of the portfolio. The securitization price is determined from the assumed proceeds of a hypothetical securitization in the current market, adjusted for transformation costs (i.e., direct costs other than transaction costs) and securitization uncertainties such as market conditions and liquidity. As a result of the severe reduction in the level of activity in certain securitization markets since the second half of 2007, observable securitization prices for certain directly comparable portfolios of loans have not been readily available. Therefore, such portfolios of loans are generally classified inas Level 3 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy. However, for other loan securitization markets, such as those related to conforming prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate mortgage loans, pricing verification of the hypothetical securitizations has been possible, since these markets have remained active. Accordingly, these loan portfolios are classified as Level 2 in the fair-valuefair value hierarchy.
Trading Account Assetsaccount assets and Liabilities—Derivativesliabilities—derivatives
Exchange-traded derivatives are generally fair valued using quoted market (i.e., exchange) prices and so are classified inas Level 1 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy.
The majority of derivatives entered into by the Company are executed over the counter and so are valued using internal valuation techniques as no quoted market prices exist for such instruments. The valuation techniques and inputs depend on the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument. The principal techniques used to value these instruments are discounted cash flows, Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo simulation. The fair values of derivative contracts reflect cash the Company has paid or received (for example, option premiums paid and received).
The key inputs depend upon the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument and include interest rate yield curves, foreign-exchange rates, the spot price of the underlying volatility and correlation. The item is placed in either Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of the significant inputs to the model. Correlation and items with longer tenors are generally less observable.
Subprime-Related Direct ExposuresSubprime-related direct exposures in CDOs
The Company accounts for its CDO super senior subprime direct exposures and the underlying securities on a fair-value basis with all changes in fair value recorded in earnings. Citigroup's CDO super senior subprime direct exposures are not subject to valuation based on observable transactions. Accordingly, the fair value of these exposures is based on management's best estimates based on facts and circumstances as of the date of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
Citigroup's CDO super senior subprime direct exposures are Level 3 assets. The valuation of the high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO positions uses trader prices based on the underlying assets of each high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO. Unlike the ABCP and CDO-squared positions, theThe high-grade and mezzanine positions are now largely hedged through the ABX and bond short positions, which are by necessity, trader priced. This results in closer symmetry in the way these long and short positions are valued by the Company. Citigroup intends to use trader marks to value this portion of the portfolio going forward so long as it remains largely hedged.
The valuation of the ABCP and CDO-squared positions are subject to valuation based on significant unobservable inputs. Fair value of these exposures is based on estimates of future cash flows from the mortgage loans underlying the assets of the ABS CDOs. To determine the performance of the underlying mortgage loan portfolios, the Company estimates the prepayments, defaults and loss severities based on a number of macroeconomic factors, including housing price changes, unemployment rates, interest rates and borrower and loan attributes, such as age, credit scores, documentation status, loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and debt-to-income (DTI) ratios. The model is calibrated using available mortgage loan information including historical loan performance. In addition, the methodology estimates the impact of geographic concentration of mortgages and the impact of reported fraud in the origination of subprime mortgages. An appropriate discount rate is then applied to the cash flows generated for each ABCP and CDO-squared tranche, in order to estimate its fair value under current market conditions.
When necessary, the valuation methodology used by Citigroup is refined and the inputs used for the purposes of estimation are modified, in part, to reflect ongoing market developments. More specifically, the inputs of home price appreciation (HPA) assumptions and delinquency data were updated along with discount rates that are based upon a weighted average combination of implied spreads from single name ABS bond prices and ABX indices, as well as CLO spreads under current market conditions.
The housing-price changes were estimated using a forward-looking projection, which incorporated the Loan Performance Index. In addition, the Company's mortgage default model also uses recent mortgage performance data, a period of sharp home price declines and high levels of mortgage foreclosures.
The valuation as of June 30, 2009 assumes a cumulative decline in U.S. housing prices from peak to trough of 32.3%.
This rate assumes declines of 10% and 3% in 2009 and 2010, respectively, the remainder of the 32.3% decline having already occurred before the end of 2008.
In addition, the discount rates were based on a weighted average combination of the implied spreads from single name ABS bond prices, ABX indices and CLO spreads, depending on vintage and asset types. To determine the discount margin, the Company applies the mortgage default model to the bonds underlying the ABX indices and other referenced cash bonds and solves for the discount margin that produces the current market prices of those instruments.
The primary drivers that currently impact the super senior valuations are the discount rates used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows and projected mortgage loan performance.
For most of the lending and structuring direct subprime exposures, (excluding super seniors), fair value is determined utilizing observable transactions where available, other market data for similar assets in markets that are not active and other internal valuation techniques.
Investments
The investments category includes available-for-sale debt and marketable equity securities, whose fair value is determined using the same procedures described for trading securities above or, in some cases, using vendor prices as the primary source.
Also included in investments are nonpublic investments in private equity and real estate entities held by theS&B business. Determining the fair value of nonpublic securities involves a significant degree of management resources and judgment as no quoted prices exist and such securities are generally very thinly traded. In addition, there may be transfer restrictions on private equity securities. The Company uses an established process for determining the fair value of such securities, using commonly accepted valuation techniques, including the use of earnings multiples based on comparable public securities, industry-specific non-earnings-based multiples and discounted cash flow models. In determining the fair value of nonpublic securities, the Company also considers events such as a proposed sale of the investee company, initial public offerings, equity issuances, or other observable transactions.
Private equity securities are generally classified inas Level 3 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy.
Short-Term BorrowingsShort-term borrowings and Long-Term Debtlong-term debt
Where fair-valuefair value accounting has been elected, the fair value of non-structured liabilities is determined by discounting expected cash flows using the appropriate discount rate for the applicable maturity. Such instruments are generally classified inas Level 2 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy as all inputs are readily observable.
The Company determines the fair value of structured liabilities (where performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation or currency risks) and hybrid financial instruments (performance linked to risks other than interest rates, inflation or currency risks) using the appropriate derivative valuation methodology (described above) given the nature of the embedded risk profile. Such instruments are classified inas Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of significant inputs to the model.
Market Valuation Adjustmentsvaluation adjustments
Liquidity adjustments are applied to items in Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy to ensure that the fair value reflects the price at which the entire position could be liquidated. The liquidity reserve is based on the bid-offer spread for an instrument, adjusted to take into account the size of the position.
Counterparty credit-risk adjustments are applied to derivatives, such as over-the-counter derivatives, where the base valuation uses market parameters based on the LIBOR interest rate curves. Not all counterparties have the same credit risk as that implied by the relevant LIBOR curve, so it is necessary to consider the market view of the credit risk of a counterparty in order to estimate the fair value of such an item.
Bilateral or "own" credit-risk adjustments are applied to reflect the Company's own credit risk when valuing derivatives and liabilities measured at fair value, in accordance with the requirements of SFAS 157 (ASC 820-10-35-17 through 35-18).value. Counterparty and own credit adjustments consider the expected future cash flows between Citi and its counterparties under the terms of the instrument and the effect of credit risk on the valuation of those cash flows, rather than a point-in-time assessment of the current recognized net asset or liability. Furthermore, the credit-risk adjustments take into account the effect of credit-risk mitigants, such as pledged collateral and any legal right of offset (to the extent such offset exists) with a counterparty through arrangements such as netting agreements.
Auction Rate Securitiesrate securities
Auction rate securities (ARS) are long-term municipal bonds, corporate bonds, securitizations and preferred stocks with interest rates or dividend yields that are reset through periodic auctions. The coupon paid in the current period is based on the rate determined by the prior auction. In the event of an auction failure, ARS holders receive a "fail rate" coupon, which is specified by the original issue documentation of each ARS.
Where insufficient orders to purchase all of the ARS issue to be sold in an auction were received, the primary dealer or auction agent would traditionally have purchased any residual unsold inventory (without a contractual obligation to do so). This residual inventory would then be repaid through subsequent auctions, typically in a short timeframe. Due to this auction mechanism and generally liquid market, ARS have historically traded and were valued as short-term instruments.
Citigroup acted in the capacity of primary dealer for approximately $72 billion of ARS and continued to purchase residual unsold inventory in support of the auction mechanism until mid-February 2008. After this date, liquidity in the ARS market deteriorated significantly, auctions failed due to a lack of bids from third-party investors and Citigroup ceased to purchase unsold inventory. Following a number of ARS refinancings, at June 30, 2009,2010, Citigroup continued to act in the capacity of primary dealer for approximately $34$25.9 billion of outstanding ARS.
The Company classifies its ARS as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale and trading securities.
Prior to ourthe Company's first auction's failing in the first quarter of 2008, Citigroup valued ARS based on observation of auction market prices, because the auctions had a short maturity period (7, 28 and 35 days). This generally resulted in valuations at par. Once
the auctions failed, ARS could no longer be valued using observation of auction market prices. Accordingly, the fair value of ARS is currently estimated using internally developed discounted cash flow valuation techniques specific to the nature of the assets underlying each ARS.
For ARS with U.S. municipal securities as underlying assets, future cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the securities underlying each individual ARS and discounted at an estimated discount rate in order to estimate the current fair value. The key assumptions that impact the ARS valuations are estimated prepayments and refinancings, estimated fail rate coupons (i.e., the rate paid in the event of auction failure, which varies according to the current credit rating of the issuer) and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows. The discount rate used for each ARS is based on rates observed for straight issuances of other municipal securities. In order to arrive at the appropriate discount rate, these observed rates were adjusted upward to factor in the specifics of the ARS structure being valued, such as callability, and the illiquidity in the ARS market.
For ARS with student loans as underlying assets, future cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the loans underlying each individual ARS, discounted at an appropriate rate in order to estimate the current fair value. The key assumptions that impact the ARS valuations are the expected weighted average life of the structure, estimated fail rate coupons, the amount of leverage in each structure and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows. The discount rate used for each ARS is based on rates observed for basic securitizations with similar maturities to the loans underlying each ARS being valued. In order to arrive at the appropriate discount rate, these observed rates were adjusted upward to factor in the specifics of the ARS structure being valued, such as callability, and the illiquidity in the ARS market.
During the first quarterThe majority of 2008, ARS for which the auctions failed and where no secondary market has developed were moved to Level 3, as the assets were subject to valuation using significant unobservable inputs. For ARS which are subject to SFAS 157(ASC 820-10) classification, the majority continue to be classified inas Level 3.
Alt-A Mortgage Securitiesmortgage securities
The Company classifies its Alt-A mortgage securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale and trading investments. The securities classified as trading and available-for-sale are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value reported in current earnings and AOCI, respectively. For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) where (1) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (2) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral composed of full documentation loans.
Similar to the valuation methodologies used for other trading securities and trading loans, the Company generally
determines the fair value of Alt-A mortgage securities utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair-value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources. Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in securities with the same or similar characteristics to that being valued.
The internal valuation techniques used for Alt-A mortgage securities, as with other mortgage exposures, consider estimated housing price changes, unemployment rates, interest rates and borrower attributes. They also consider prepayment rates as well as other market indicators.
Alt-A mortgage securities that are valued using these methods are generally classified as Level 2. However, Alt-A mortgage securities backed by Alt-A mortgages of lower quality or more recent vintages are mostly classified inas Level 3 due to the reduced liquidity that exists for such positions, which reduces the reliability of prices available from independent sources.
Commercial Real Estate Exposurereal estate exposure
Citigroup reports a number of different exposures linked to commercial real estate at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings, including securities, loans and investments in entities that hold commercial real estate loans or commercial real estate directly. The Company also reports securities backed by commercial real estate asAvailable-for-sale available-for-sale investments,, which are carried at fair value with changes in fair-value reported in AOCI.
Similar to the valuation methodologies used for other trading securities and trading loans, the Company generally determines the fair value of securities and loans linked to commercial real estate utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair-value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources. Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in securities or loans with the same or similar characteristics to thatthose being valued. Securities and loans linked to commercial real estate valued using these methodologies are generally classified as Level 3 as a result of the reduced liquidity currently in the market for such exposures.
The fair value of investments in entities that hold commercial real estate loans or commercial real estate directly is determined using a similar methodology to that used for other non-public investments in real estate held by theS&B business. The Company uses an established process for determining the fair value of such securities, using commonly accepted valuation techniques, including the use of earnings multiples based on comparable public securities, industry-specific non-earnings-based multiples and discounted cash flow models. In determining the fair value of such investments, the Company also considers events, such as a proposed sale of the investee company, initial public offerings, equity issuances, or other observable transactions. Such investments are generally classified inas Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy.
Highly Leveraged Financing Commitments
The Company reports approximately $900 million of highly leveraged loans as held for sale, which are measured on a LOCOM basis. The fair value of such exposures is determined, where possible, using quoted secondary-market prices and
classified in Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy if there is a sufficient level of activity in the market and quotes or traded prices are available with suitable frequency.
However, due to the dislocation of the credit markets and the reduced market interest in higher risk/higher yield instruments since the latter half of 2007, liquidity in the market for highly leveraged financings has been limited. Therefore, a majority of such exposures are classified in Level 3 as quoted secondary market prices do not generally exist. The fair value for such exposures is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of the loan being valued.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present for each of the fair-value hierarchy levels the Company's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.basis. The Company often hedges positions that have been classified in the Level 3 category with financial instruments that have been classified as Level 1 or Level 2. In addition, the Company also hedges items classified in the Level 3 category with instruments classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The effects of these hedges are presented gross in the following table.tables, as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
In millions of dollars at June 30, 2009 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Gross inventory | Netting(1) | Net balance | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | $ | — | $ | 108,516 | $ | — | $ | 108,516 | $ | (34,761 | ) | $ | 73,755 | |||||||||
Trading securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored | — | $ | 25,930 | $ | 1,244 | $ | 27,174 | $ | — | $ | 27,174 | |||||||||||
Prime | — | 428 | 623 | 1,051 | — | 1,051 | ||||||||||||||||
Alt-A | — | 530 | 777 | 1,307 | — | 1,307 | ||||||||||||||||
Subprime | — | 582 | 10,001 | 10,583 | — | 10,583 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | — | 1,241 | 345 | 1,586 | — | 1,586 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial | — | 827 | 2,808 | 3,635 | — | 3,635 | ||||||||||||||||
Total trading mortgage-backed securities | $ | — | $ | 29,538 | $ | 15,798 | $ | 45,336 | $ | — | $ | 45,336 | ||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | 6,766 | $ | 2,997 | $ | — | $ | 9,763 | $ | — | $ | 9,763 | ||||||||||
Agency obligations | 1 | 4,240 | 49 | 4,290 | — | 4,290 | ||||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | $ | 6,767 | $ | 7,237 | $ | 49 | $ | 14,053 | $ | — | $ | 14,053 | ||||||||||
Other trading securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
State and municipal | $ | — | $ | 5,947 | $ | 109 | $ | 6,056 | — | $ | 6,056 | |||||||||||
Foreign government | 42,350 | 14,730 | 590 | 57,670 | — | 57,670 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate | — | 46,345 | 9,435 | 55,780 | — | 55,780 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 30,497 | 7,569 | 1,866 | 39,932 | — | 39,932 | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | — | 16,206 | 16,846 | 33,052 | — | 33,052 | ||||||||||||||||
Total trading securities | $ | 79,614 | $ | 127,572 | $ | 44,693 | $ | 251,879 | $ | — | $ | 251,879 | ||||||||||
Derivatives | $ | 5,987 | $ | 784,342 | $ | 35,896 | $ | 826,225 | (753,067 | ) | $ | 73,158 | ||||||||||
Investments | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored | $ | 1,388 | $ | 26,975 | $ | 78 | $ | 28,441 | $ | — | $ | 28,441 | ||||||||||
Prime | — | 5,258 | 775 | 6,033 | — | 6,033 | ||||||||||||||||
Alt-A | — | 252 | 271 | 523 | — | 523 | ||||||||||||||||
Subprime | — | — | 17 | 17 | — | 17 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. Residential | — | 279 | — | 279 | — | 279 | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial | — | 70 | 719 | 789 | — | 789 | ||||||||||||||||
Total investment mortgage-backed securities | $ | 1,388 | $ | 32,834 | $ | 1,860 | $ | 36,082 | $ | — | $ | 36,082 | ||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal Agency securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | 6,401 | $ | 1,210 | $ | — | $ | 7,611 | $ | — | $ | 7,611 | ||||||||||
Agency obligations | — | 16,668 | 9 | 16,677 | — | 16,677 | ||||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency | $ | 6,401 | $ | 17,878 | $ | 9 | 24,288 | $ | — | $ | 24,288 | |||||||||||
State and municipal | $ | — | $ | 17,426 | $ | 252 | $ | 17,678 | $ | — | $ | 17,678 | ||||||||||
Foreign government | 35,929 | 39,057 | 168 | 75,154 | — | 75,154 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate | — | 19,633 | 1,688 | 21,321 | — | 21,321 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 2,796 | 211 | 2,818 | 5,825 | — | 5,825 | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 580 | 1,881 | 8,429 | 10,890 | — | 10,890 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-Marketable equity securities | — | 135 | 7,800 | 7,935 | — | 7,935 | ||||||||||||||||
Total investments | $ | 47,094 | $ | 129,055 | $ | 23,024 | $ | 199,173 | $ | — | $ | 199,173 | ||||||||||
Loans(2) | — | 1,635 | 196 | 1,831 | — | 1,831 | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights | — | — | 6,770 | 6,770 | — | 6,770 | ||||||||||||||||
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale(3) | 3,946 | 2,101 | 486 | 6,533 | — | 6,533 | ||||||||||||||||
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis | — | 21,305 | 1,645 | 22,950 | (3,650 | ) | 19,300 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 136,641 | $ | 1,174,526 | $ | 112,710 | $ | 1,423,877 | $ | (791,478 | ) | $ | 632,399 | |||||||||
9.6 | % | 82.5 | % | 7.9 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars at June 30, 2010 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Gross inventory | Netting(1) | Net balance | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | $ | — | $ | 128,112 | $ | 6,518 | $ | 134,630 | $ | (36,531 | ) | $ | 98,099 | ||||||||
Trading securities | |||||||||||||||||||||
Trading mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored | $ | — | $ | 24,153 | $ | 758 | $ | 24,911 | $ | — | $ | 24,911 | |||||||||
Prime | — | 1,053 | 610 | 1,663 | — | 1,663 | |||||||||||||||
Alt-A | — | 948 | 451 | 1,399 | — | 1,399 | |||||||||||||||
Subprime | — | 626 | 1,885 | 2,511 | — | 2,511 | |||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | — | 2,144 | 234 | 2,378 | — | 2,378 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial | — | 1,045 | 2,184 | 3,229 | — | 3,229 | |||||||||||||||
Total trading mortgage-backed securities | $ | — | $ | 29,969 | $ | 6,122 | $ | 36,091 | $ | — | $ | 36,091 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | |||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | 21,129 | $ | 512 | $ | — | $ | 21,641 | $ | — | $ | 21,641 | |||||||||
Agency obligations | — | 4,184 | — | 4,184 | — | 4,184 | |||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | $ | 21,129 | $ | 4,696 | $ | — | $ | 25,825 | $ | — | $ | 25,825 | |||||||||
State and municipal | $ | — | $ | 6,589 | $ | 57 | $ | 6,646 | $ | — | $ | 6,646 | |||||||||
Foreign government | 62,605 | 17,513 | 386 | 80,504 | — | 80,504 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate | — | 42,921 | 6,211 | 49,132 | — | 49,132 | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 26,665 | 7,522 | 533 | 34,720 | — | 34,720 | |||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | — | 1,750 | 4,202 | 5,952 | 5,952 | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | — | 12,974 | 1,047 | 14,021 | — | 14,021 | |||||||||||||||
Total trading securities | $ | 110,399 | $ | 123,934 | $ | 18,558 | $ | 252,891 | $ | — | $ | 252,891 | |||||||||
Derivatives | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 614 | $ | 586,605 | $ | 2,977 | $ | 590,196 | |||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 4 | 81,275 | 879 | 82,158 | |||||||||||||||||
Equity contracts | 3,030 | 15,429 | 1,967 | 20,426 | |||||||||||||||||
Commodity and other contracts | 581 | 11,519 | 899 | 12,999 | |||||||||||||||||
Credit derivatives | — | 70,544 | 14,443 | 84,987 | |||||||||||||||||
Total gross derivatives | $ | 4,229 | $ | 765,372 | $ | 21,165 | $ | 790,766 | |||||||||||||
Cash collateral paid | 49,035 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Netting agreements and market value adjustments | $ | (783,280 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total derivatives | $ | 4,229 | $ | 765,372 | $ | 21,165 | $ | 839,801 | $ | (783,280 | ) | $ | 56,521 | ||||||||
Investments | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored | $ | 82 | $ | 20,315 | $ | 1 | $ | 20,398 | $ | — | $ | 20,398 | |||||||||
Prime | — | 4,886 | 772 | 5,658 | — | 5,658 | |||||||||||||||
Alt-A | — | 505 | 205 | 710 | — | 710 | |||||||||||||||
Subprime | — | 109 | 14 | 123 | — | 123 | |||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | — | 1,647 | 814 | 2,461 | — | 2,461 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial | — | 81 | 558 | 639 | — | 639 | |||||||||||||||
Total investment mortgage-backed securities | $ | 82 | $ | 27,543 | $ | 2,364 | $ | 29,989 | $ | — | $ | 29,989 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | |||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | 12,938 | $ | 26,722 | $ | — | $ | 39,660 | $ | — | $ | 39,660 | |||||||||
Agency obligations | — | 44,551 | 19 | 44,570 | 44,570 | ||||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency | $ | 12,938 | $ | 71,273 | $ | 19 | $ | 84,230 | $ | — | $ | 84,230 | |||||||||
In millions of dollars at June 30, 2009 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Gross inventory | Netting(1) | Net balance | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | — | $ | 1,995 | $ | 112 | $ | 2,107 | $ | — | $ | 2,107 | ||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | — | 143,690 | 7,204 | 150,894 | (34,761 | ) | 116,133 | |||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | 36,325 | 18,478 | 961 | 55,764 | — | 55,764 | ||||||||||||||
Derivatives | 6,088 | 768,211 | 34,716 | 809,015 | (745,467 | ) | 63,548 | |||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | — | 2,981 | 377 | 3,358 | — | 3,358 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | — | 13,489 | 11,201 | 24,690 | — | 24,690 | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale(3) | 837 | 1,452 | — | 2,289 | — | 2,289 | ||||||||||||||
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis | — | 16,298 | 19 | 16,317 | (3,650 | ) | 12,667 | |||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 43,250 | $ | 966,594 | $ | 54,590 | $ | 1,064,434 | $ | (783,878 | ) | $ | 280,556 | |||||||
4.1 | % | 90.8 | % | 5.1 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||
In millions of dollars at June 30, 2010 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Gross inventory | Netting(1) | Net balance | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
State and municipal | $ | — | $ | 15,117 | $ | 457 | $ | 15,574 | — | $ | 15,574 | ||||||||||
Foreign government | 51,467 | 47,122 | 282 | 98,871 | — | 98,871 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate | — | 15,224 | 1,271 | 16,495 | — | 16,495 | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 3,190 | 180 | 2,238 | 5,608 | — | 5,608 | |||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | — | 5,649 | 12,303 | 17,952 | — | 17,952 | |||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | — | 1,303 | 891 | 2,194 | — | 2,194 | |||||||||||||||
Non-marketable equity securities | — | 137 | 6,561 | 6,698 | — | 6,698 | |||||||||||||||
Total investments | $ | 67,677 | $ | 183,548 | $ | 26,386 | $ | 277,611 | — | $ | 277,611 | ||||||||||
Loans(2) | $ | — | 1,310 | $ | 3,668 | 4,978 | — | $ | 4,978 | ||||||||||||
MSRs | — | — | 4,894 | 4,894 | — | 4,894 | |||||||||||||||
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis | — | 17,203 | 3,089 | 20,292 | �� | (1,576 | ) | 18,716 | |||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 182,305 | $ | 1,219,479 | $ | 84,278 | $ | 1,535,097 | $ | (821,387 | ) | $ | 713,710 | ||||||||
Total as a percentage of gross assets(3) | 12.3 | % | 82.1 | % | 5.6 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | — | $ | 1,204 | $ | 183 | $ | 1,387 | $ | — | $ | 1,387 | |||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned | — | 154,722 | 1,091 | 155,813 | (36,531 | ) | 119,282 | ||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | 57,025 | 14,082 | 621 | 71,728 | — | 71,728 | |||||||||||||||
Derivatives | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | 569 | 581,092 | 2,402 | 584,063 | |||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 18 | 84,803 | 629 | 85,450 | |||||||||||||||||
Equity contracts | 3,406 | 31,731 | 3,200 | 38,337 | |||||||||||||||||
Commodity and other contracts | 505 | 11,179 | 1,423 | 13,107 | |||||||||||||||||
Credit derivatives | — | 65,020 | 12,370 | 77,390 | |||||||||||||||||
Total gross derivatives | $ | 4,498 | $ | 773,825 | $ | 20,024 | $ | 798,347 | |||||||||||||
Cash collateral received | 39,216 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Netting agreements and market value adjustments | (778,290 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total derivatives | $ | 4,498 | $ | 773,825 | $ | 20,024 | $ | 837,563 | $ | (778,290 | ) | $ | 59,273 | ||||||||
Short-term borrowings | — | 1,205 | 445 | 1,650 | 1,650 | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | — | 15,117 | 10,741 | 25,858 | 25,858 | ||||||||||||||||
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis | 1 | 12,773 | 7 | 12,781 | (1,576 | ) | 11,205 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 61,524 | $ | 972,928 | $ | 33,112 | $ | 1,106,780 | $ | (816,397 | ) | $ | 290,383 | ||||||||
Total as a percentage of gross liabilities(3) | 5.8 | % | 91.1 | % | 3.1 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||
In millions of dollars at December 31, 2008 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Gross inventory | Netting(1) | Net balance | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | $ | — | $ | 96,524 | $ | — | $ | 96,524 | $ | (26,219 | ) | $ | 70,305 | |||||||
Trading account assets | ||||||||||||||||||||
Trading securities and loans | 90,530 | 121,043 | 50,773 | 262,346 | — | 262,346 | ||||||||||||||
Derivatives | 9,675 | 1,102,252 | 60,725 | 1,172,652 | (1,057,363 | ) | 115,289 | |||||||||||||
Investments | 44,342 | 111,836 | 28,273 | 184,451 | — | 184,451 | ||||||||||||||
Loans(2) | — | 2,572 | 160 | 2,732 | — | 2,732 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights | — | — | 5,657 | 5,657 | — | 5,657 | ||||||||||||||
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis | — | 25,540 | 359 | 25,899 | (4,527 | ) | 21,372 | |||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 144,547 | $ | 1,459,767 | $ | 145,947 | $ | 1,750,261 | $ | (1,088,109 | ) | $ | 662,152 | |||||||
8.3 | % | 83.4 | % | 8.3 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | — | $ | 2,552 | $ | 54 | $ | 2,606 | $ | — | $ | 2,606 | ||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | — | 153,918 | 11,167 | 165,085 | (26,219 | ) | 138,866 | |||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | 36,848 | 13,192 | 653 | 50,693 | — | 50,693 | ||||||||||||||
Derivatives | 10,038 | 1,096,113 | 57,139 | 1,163,290 | (1,046,505 | ) | 116,785 | |||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | — | 16,278 | 1,329 | 17,607 | — | 17,607 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | — | 16,065 | 11,198 | 27,263 | — | 27,263 | ||||||||||||||
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis | — | 16,415 | 1 | 16,416 | (4,527 | ) | 11,889 | |||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 46,886 | $ | 1,314,533 | $ | 81,541 | $ | 1,442,960 | $ | (1,077,251 | ) | $ | 365,709 | |||||||
3.2 | % | 91.1 | % | 5.7 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||
In millions of dollars at December 31, 2009 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Gross inventory | Netting(1) | Net balance | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASSETS | |||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or | $ | — | $ | 138,550 | $ | — | $ | 138,550 | $ | (50,713 | ) | $ | 87,837 | ||||||||
Trading securities | |||||||||||||||||||||
Trading mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed | $ | — | $ | 19,666 | $ | 972 | $ | 20,638 | $ | — | $ | 20,638 | |||||||||
Prime | — | 772 | 384 | 1,156 | — | 1,156 | |||||||||||||||
Alt-A | — | 842 | 387 | 1,229 | — | 1,229 | |||||||||||||||
Subprime | — | 736 | 8,998 | 9,734 | — | 9,734 | |||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | — | 1,796 | 572 | 2,368 | — | 2,368 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial | — | 1,004 | 2,451 | 3,455 | — | 3,455 | |||||||||||||||
Total trading mortgage-backed securities | $ | — | $ | 24,816 | $ | 13,764 | $ | 38,580 | $ | — | $ | 38,580 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | |||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | 27,943 | $ | 995 | $ | — | $ | 28,938 | $ | — | $ | 28,938 | |||||||||
Agency obligations | — | 2,041 | — | $ | 2,041 | — | 2,041 | ||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | $ | 27,943 | $ | 3,036 | $ | — | $ | 30,979 | $ | — | $ | 30,979 | |||||||||
Other trading securities | |||||||||||||||||||||
State and municipal | $ | — | $ | 6,925 | $ | 222 | $ | 7,147 | $ | — | $ | 7,147 | |||||||||
Foreign government | 59,229 | 13,081 | 459 | 72,769 | — | 72,769 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate | — | 43,365 | 8,620 | 51,985 | — | 51,985 | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 33,754 | 11,827 | 640 | 46,221 | — | 46,221 | |||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | — | 19,976 | 16,237 | 36,213 | — | 36,213 | |||||||||||||||
Total trading securities | $ | 120,926 | $ | 123,026 | $ | 39,942 | $ | 283,894 | $ | — | $ | 283,894 | |||||||||
Total derivatives(2) | $ | 4,002 | $ | 671,532 | $ | 27,685 | $ | 703,219 | $ | (644,340 | ) | $ | 58,879 | ||||||||
Investments | |||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed | $ | 89 | $ | 20,823 | $ | 2 | $ | 20,914 | $ | — | $ | 20,914 | |||||||||
Prime | — | 5,742 | 736 | 6,478 | — | 6,478 | |||||||||||||||
Alt-A | — | 572 | 55 | 627 | — | 627 | |||||||||||||||
Subprime | — | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | — | 255 | — | 255 | — | 255 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial | — | 47 | 746 | 793 | — | 793 | |||||||||||||||
Total investment mortgage-backed securities | $ | 89 | $ | 27,439 | $ | 1,540 | $ | 29,068 | $ | — | $ | 29,068 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities | |||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | 5,943 | $ | 20,619 | $ | — | $ | 26,562 | $ | — | $ | 26,562 | |||||||||
Agency obligations | — | 27,531 | 21 | 27,552 | — | 27,552 | |||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency | $ | 5,943 | $ | 48,150 | $ | 21 | $ | 54,114 | $ | — | $ | 54,114 | |||||||||
State and municipal | $ | — | $ | 15,393 | $ | 217 | $ | 15,610 | $ | — | $ | 15,610 | |||||||||
Foreign government | 60,484 | 41,765 | 270 | 102,519 | — | 102,519 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate | — | 19,056 | 1,257 | 20,313 | — | 20,313 | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 3,056 | 237 | 2,513 | 5,806 | — | 5,806 | |||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | — | 3,337 | 8,832 | 12,169 | — | 12,169 | |||||||||||||||
Non-marketable equity securities | — | 77 | 6,753 | 6,830 | — | 6,830 | |||||||||||||||
Total investments | $ | 69,572 | $ | 155,454 | $ | 21,403 | $ | 246,429 | $ | — | $ | 246,429 | |||||||||
Loans(3) | $ | — | $ | 1,226 | $ | 213 | $ | 1,439 | $ | — | $ | 1,439 | |||||||||
MSRs | — | — | 6,530 | 6,530 | — | 6,530 | |||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars at December 31, 2009 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Gross inventory | Netting(1) | Net balance | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis | — | 15,787 | 1,101 | 16,888 | (4,224 | ) | 12,664 | ||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 194,500 | $ | 1,105,575 | $ | 96,874 | $ | 1,396,949 | $ | (699,277 | ) | $ | 697,672 | ||||||
13.9 | % | 79.2 | % | 6.9 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
In millions of dollars at December 31, 2009 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Gross inventory | Netting(1) | Net balance | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LIABILITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | — | $ | 1,517 | $ | 28 | $ | 1,545 | $ | — | $ | 1,545 | ||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | — | 152,687 | 2,056 | 154,743 | (50,713 | ) | 104,030 | |||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | 52,399 | 20,233 | 774 | 73,406 | — | 73,406 | ||||||||||||||
Derivatives(2) | 4,980 | 669,384 | 24,577 | 698,941 | (634,835 | ) | 64,106 | |||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | — | 408 | 231 | 639 | — | 639 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | — | 16,288 | 9,654 | 25,942 | — | 25,942 | ||||||||||||||
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis | — | 15,753 | 13 | 15,766 | (4,224 | ) | 11,542 | |||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 57,379 | $ | 876,270 | $ | 37,333 | $ | 970,982 | $ | (689,772 | ) | $ | 281,210 | |||||||
5.9 | % | 90.2 | % | 3.8 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||||
Changes in Level 3 Fair-Value Category
The following tables present the changes in the Level 3 fair-value category for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.category. The Company classifies financial instruments in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy when there is reliance on at least one significant unobservable input to the valuation model. In addition to these unobservable inputs, the valuation models for Level 3 financial instruments typically also rely on a number of inputs that are readily observable either directly or indirectly. Thus, the gains and losses presented below include changes in the fair value related to both observable and unobservable inputs.
The Company often hedges positions with offsetting positions that are classified in a different level. For example, the gains and losses for assets and liabilities in the Level 3 category presented in the tables below do not reflect the effect of offsetting losses and gains on hedging instruments that have been classified by the Company in the Level 1 and Level 2 categories. In addition, the Company hedges items classified in the Level 3 category with instruments also classified in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy. The effects of these hedges are presented gross in the following tables.
| | Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | Purchases, issuances and settlements | | Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3) | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | March 31, 2009 | Principal transactions | Other(1)(2) | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored | $ | 1,316 | $ | 244 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (316 | ) | $ | 1,244 | $ | 268 | |||||||||
Prime | 582 | (20 | ) | — | — | 61 | 623 | (20 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 1,250 | (50 | ) | — | — | (423 | ) | 777 | (49 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Subprime | 10,386 | 667 | — | — | (1,052 | ) | 10,001 | 645 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 325 | (42 | ) | — | — | 62 | 345 | (34 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Commercial | 2,883 | 5 | — | — | (80 | ) | 2,808 | (26 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total trading mortgage-backed securities | $ | 16,742 | $ | 804 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (1,748 | ) | $ | 15,798 | $ | 784 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Agency obligations | 51 | — | — | (3 | ) | 1 | 49 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | $ | 51 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | 49 | $ | — | |||||||||
State and municipal | $ | 198 | $ | (23 | ) | $ | — | $ | (136 | ) | $ | 70 | $ | 109 | $ | (23 | ) | |||||||
Foreign government | 1,011 | 60 | — | (390 | ) | (91 | ) | 590 | 20 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate | 9,382 | 221 | — | 249 | (417 | ) | 9,435 | 245 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 1,740 | 112 | — | 104 | (90 | ) | 1,866 | 174 | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 13,746 | 338 | — | 109 | 2,653 | 16,846 | 222 | |||||||||||||||||
Total trading securities | $ | 42,870 | $ | 1,512 | $ | — | $ | (67 | ) | $ | 378 | $ | 44,693 | $ | 1,422 | |||||||||
Derivatives, net(4) | $ | 3,539 | $ | (2,492 | ) | $ | — | $ | 364 | $ | (231 | ) | $ | 1,180 | $ | (2,678 | ) | |||||||
Investments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 75 | $ | 3 | $ | 78 | $ | (2 | ) | |||||||||
Prime | 1,125 | — | 159 | (171 | ) | (338 | ) | 775 | 109 | |||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 177 | — | 40 | 55 | (1 | ) | 271 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||
Subprime | 12 | — | (3 | ) | (10 | ) | 18 | 17 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 469 | — | 28 | (61 | ) | 283 | 719 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||
Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities | $ | 1,783 | $ | — | $ | 224 | $ | (112 | ) | $ | (35 | ) | $ | 1,860 | $ | 161 | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Agency obligations | — | — | — | 9 | — | 9 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 9 | $ | — | $ | 9 | $ | — | ||||||||||
State and municipal | $ | 207 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 45 | $ | — | $ | 252 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Foreign government | 643 | — | — | (474 | ) | (1 | ) | 168 | — | |||||||||||||||
Corporate | 992 | — | 67 | (99 | ) | 728 | 1,688 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 2,849 | — | 49 | (7 | ) | (73 | ) | 2,818 | 49 | |||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 8,742 | — | 1,243 | (386 | ) | (1,170 | ) | 8,429 | 1,261 | |||||||||||||||
Non-Marketable equity securities | 7,479 | — | 21 | 619 | (319 | ) | 7,800 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||
Total investments | $ | 22,695 | $ | — | $ | 1,604 | $ | (405 | ) | $ | (870 | ) | $ | 23,024 | $ | 1,527 | ||||||||
Loans | $ | 171 | $ | — | $ | 24 | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | 196 | $ | 25 |
| | Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | Purchases, issuances and settlements | | Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3) | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | March 31, 2009 | Principal transactions | Other(1)(2) | June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights | $ | 5,481 | $ | — | $ | 1,310 | $ | — | $ | (21 | ) | $ | 6,770 | $ | 1,310 | ||||||||
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis | 2,515 | — | (1,107 | ) | 329 | (92 | ) | 1,645 | $ | (1,107 | ) | ||||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 41 | $ | — | $ | (63 | ) | $ | — | $ | 8 | $ | 112 | $ | (63 | ) | |||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 10,732 | 276 | — | (3,391 | ) | 139 | 7,204 | 264 | |||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | 1,311 | 8 | — | (434 | ) | 92 | 961 | 8 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 1,030 | — | 43 | (49 | ) | (561 | ) | 377 | 43 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 10,438 | — | (412 | ) | 51 | 300 | 11,201 | (376 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis | 1 | — | (42 | ) | — | (24 | ) | 19 | (19 | ) | |||||||||||||
| | Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | Purchases, issuances and settlements | | Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | March 31, 2010 | Principal transactions | Other(1)(2) | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | $ | 1,907 | $ | 446 | $ | — | $ | 4,165 | $ | — | $ | 6,518 | $ | — | |||||||||||
Trading securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored | $ | 947 | $ | (107 | ) | $ | — | $ | 71 | $ | (153 | ) | $ | 758 | $ | (123 | ) | ||||||||
Prime | 399 | (2 | ) | — | 67 | 146 | 610 | (20 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 321 | 15 | — | 100 | 15 | 451 | 45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subprime | 6,525 | (697 | ) | — | 126 | (4,069 | ) | 1,885 | (1,890 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 243 | 14 | — | 20 | (43 | ) | 234 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 2,215 | 1 | — | (142 | ) | 110 | 2,184 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
Total trading mortgage-backed securities | $ | 10,650 | $ | (776 | ) | $ | — | $ | 242 | $ | (3,994 | ) | $ | 6,122 | $ | (1,990 | ) | ||||||||
State and municipal | $ | 453 | $ | 8 | $ | — | $ | (129 | ) | $ | (275 | ) | $ | 57 | $ | — | |||||||||
Foreign government | 644 | (15 | ) | — | 11 | (254 | ) | 386 | (20 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Corporate | 7,950 | (74 | ) | — | (144 | ) | (1,521 | ) | 6,211 | (114 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 905 | 10 | — | (338 | ) | (44 | ) | 533 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 4,200 | (16 | ) | — | 74 | (56 | ) | 4,202 | (242 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 1,129 | (72 | ) | — | (48 | ) | 38 | 1,047 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total trading securities | $ | 25,931 | $ | (935 | ) | $ | — | $ | (332 | ) | $ | (6,106 | ) | $ | 18,558 | $ | (2,344 | ) | |||||||
Derivatives, net(4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | 339 | $ | 190 | $ | — | $ | (175 | ) | $ | 221 | $ | 575 | $ | 481 | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | 33 | 206 | — | (1 | ) | 12 | 250 | 249 | |||||||||||||||||
Equity contracts | (1,420 | ) | (48 | ) | — | (51 | ) | 286 | (1,233 | ) | (307 | ) | |||||||||||||
Commodity and other contracts | (645 | ) | 85 | — | 38 | (2 | ) | (524 | ) | 22 | |||||||||||||||
Credit derivatives | 5,029 | (1,421 | ) | — | (358 | ) | (1,177 | ) | 2,073 | (1,546 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total derivatives, net(4) | $ | 3,336 | $ | (988 | ) | $ | — | $ | (547 | ) | $ | (660 | ) | $ | 1,141 | $ | (1,101 | ) | |||||||
Investments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed | $ | 1 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | — | |||||||||||
Prime | 276 | — | (16 | ) | 575 | (63 | ) | 772 | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 30 | — | — | 190 | (15 | ) | 205 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Subprime | 1 | — | (1 | ) | 14 | — | 14 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. Residential | — | — | — | 814 | — | 814 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 546 | — | 13 | 1 | (2 | ) | 558 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities | $ | 854 | $ | — | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 1,594 | $ | (80 | ) | $ | 2,364 | $ | 3 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency obligations | $ | 19 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 19 | $ | — | |||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | $ | 19 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 19 | $ | — | |||||||||||
State and municipal | $ | 262 | $ | — | $ | 6 | $ | 233 | $ | (44 | ) | $ | 457 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Foreign government | 287 | — | (1 | ) | (27 | ) | 23 | 282 | (14 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Corporate | 1,062 | — | (5 | ) | 295 | (81 | ) | 1,271 | (8 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 2,468 | — | 14 | 1 | (245 | ) | 2,238 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 7,936 | — | (6 | ) | 4,802 | (429 | ) | 12,303 | (41 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 1,007 | — | 20 | (42 | ) | (94 | ) | 891 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-marketable equity securities | 8,613 | — | (2 | ) | (2,077 | ) | 27 | 6,561 | (60 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total investments | $ | 22,508 | $ | — | $ | 22 | $ | 4,779 | $ | (923 | ) | $ | 26,386 | $ | (89 | ) | |||||||||
| | Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | Purchases, issuances and settlements | | Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3) | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | December 31, 2008 | Principal transactions | Other(1)(2) | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored | $ | 1,325 | $ | 216 | $ | — | $ | 10 | $ | (307 | ) | $ | 1,244 | $ | 245 | |||||||||
Prime | 147 | (55 | ) | — | 439 | 92 | 623 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 1,153 | (119 | ) | — | (187 | ) | (70 | ) | 777 | (119 | ) | |||||||||||||
Subprime | 13,844 | (1,696 | ) | — | (710 | ) | (1,437 | ) | 10,001 | (1,648 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 858 | (74 | ) | — | (490 | ) | 51 | 345 | (58 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 2,949 | (195 | ) | — | 159 | (105 | ) | 2,808 | (220 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total trading mortgage-backed securities | $ | 20,276 | $ | (1,923 | ) | $ | — | $ | (779 | ) | $ | (1,776 | ) | $ | 15,798 | $ | (1,785 | ) | ||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Agency obligations | 59 | (9 | ) | — | (3 | ) | 2 | 49 | — | |||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | $ | 59 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | — | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | 49 | $ | — | ||||||||
State and municipal | $ | 233 | $ | (22 | ) | $ | — | $ | (80 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 109 | $ | (23 | ) | ||||||
Foreign government | 1,261 | 96 | — | (367 | ) | (400 | ) | 590 | 82 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate | 13,027 | (703 | ) | — | (792 | ) | (2,097 | ) | 9,435 | 221 | ||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 1,387 | 91 | — | 121 | 267 | 1,866 | 222 | |||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 14,530 | 11 | — | (1,198 | ) | 3,503 | 16,846 | 336 | ||||||||||||||||
Total trading securities | $ | 50,773 | $ | (2,459 | ) | $ | — | $ | (3,098 | ) | $ | (523 | ) | $ | 44,693 | $ | (947 | ) | ||||||
Derivatives, net(4) | $ | 3,586 | $ | (2,376 | ) | $ | — | $ | (717 | ) | $ | 687 | $ | 1,180 | $ | (2,376 | ) | |||||||
Investments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 75 | $ | 3 | $ | 78 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Prime | 1,163 | — | 161 | 33 | (582 | ) | 775 | 161 | ||||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 111 | — | 33 | 63 | 64 | 271 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||
Subprime | 25 | — | (9 | ) | (10 | ) | 11 | 17 | — | |||||||||||||||
Commercial | 964 | — | 9 | (463 | ) | 209 | 719 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities | $ | 2,263 | $ | — | $ | 194 | $ | (302 | ) | $ | (295 | ) | $ | 1,860 | $ | 179 | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Agency obligations | — | — | — | 9 | — | 9 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 9 | $ | — | $ | 9 | $ | — | ||||||||||
State and municipal | $ | 222 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 30 | $ | — | $ | 252 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Foreign government | 571 | — | — | (402 | ) | (1 | ) | 168 | — |
| | Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | Purchases, issuances and settlements | | Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3) | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | December 31, 2008 | Principal transactions | Other(1)(2) | June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
Corporate | $ | 1,019 | $ | — | $ | 44 | $ | 654 | $ | (29 | ) | $ | 1,688 | $ | 35 | ||||||||
Equity securities | 3,807 | — | (480 | ) | (130 | ) | (379 | ) | 2,818 | (480 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 11,324 | — | (427 | ) | (948 | ) | (1,520 | ) | 8,429 | (427 | ) | ||||||||||||
Non-Marketable equity securities | 9,067 | — | (706 | ) | (239 | ) | (322 | ) | 7,800 | (779 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total investments | $ | 28,273 | $ | — | $ | (1,375 | ) | $ | (1,328 | ) | $ | (2,546 | ) | $ | 23,024 | $ | (1,472 | ) | |||||
Loans | $ | 160 | $ | — | $ | 19 | $ | — | $ | 17 | $ | 196 | $ | 19 | |||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights | 5,657 | — | 1,440 | — | (327 | ) | 6,770 | 1,440 | |||||||||||||||
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis | 359 | — | 552 | 756 | (22 | ) | 1,645 | 552 | |||||||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 54 | $ | — | $ | (59 | ) | $ | — | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 112 | $ | (94 | ) | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 11,167 | 308 | — | (3,720 | ) | 65 | 7,204 | 301 | |||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | 653 | 44 | — | (15 | ) | 367 | 961 | 43 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 1,329 | — | (65 | ) | (746 | ) | (271 | ) | 377 | (65 | ) | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 11,198 | — | 36 | (326 | ) | 365 | 11,201 | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis | 1 | — | (43 | ) | — | (25 | ) | 19 | (43 | ) | |||||||||||||
| | Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | Purchases, issuances and settlements | | Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3) | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | March 31, 2010 | Principal transactions | Other(1)(2) | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans | $ | 4,395 | $ | — | $ | (296 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (426 | ) | $ | 3,668 | $ | (288 | ) | |||||
MSRs | 6,439 | — | (1,342 | ) | — | (203 | ) | 4,894 | (1,342 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis | 907 | — | (35 | ) | 1,996 | 221 | 3,089 | (35 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 158 | $ | — | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 25 | $ | 183 | $ | 36 | |||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 975 | (99 | ) | — | 76 | (59 | ) | 1,091 | (110 | ) | |||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | 148 | 33 | — | 509 | (3 | ) | 621 | 103 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 258 | 18 | — | 12 | 193 | 445 | (13 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 12,836 | 126 | 290 | (150 | ) | (1,529 | ) | 10,741 | 184 | ||||||||||||||
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis | 2 | — | (14 | ) | — | (9 | ) | 7 | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
| | Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | Purchases, issuances and settlements | | Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3) | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | March 31, 2008 | Principal transactions | Other(1)(2) | June 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities purchased under agreements to resell | $ | 16 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (16 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Trading account assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading securities and loans | 90,672 | (4,775 | ) | — | 793 | (9,871 | ) | 76,819 | (4,445 | ) | |||||||||||||
Investments | 20,539 | — | (211 | ) | (461 | ) | 7,219 | 27,086 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
Loans | 93 | 5 | — | — | 47 | 145 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights | 7,716 | — | 1,317 | — | (99 | ) | 8,934 | 1,317 | |||||||||||||||
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis | 812 | — | 30 | 588 | 21 | 1,451 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 105 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 111 | $ | (5 | ) | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 6,208 | 210 | — | (2,710 | ) | (122 | ) | 3,166 | 51 | ||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | 1,817 | (13 | ) | — | (40 | ) | (72 | ) | 1,718 | (63 | ) | ||||||||||||
Derivatives, net(4) | 952 | 1,323 | — | (969 | ) | 1,442 | 102 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 6,150 | 219 | — | (3,791 | ) | (980 | ) | 1,160 | 82 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 47,199 | 246 | — | 65 | (8,663 | ) | 38,355 | 136 | |||||||||||||||
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis | — | — | (15 | ) | — | 11 | 26 | 16 | |||||||||||||||
| | Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | Purchases, issuances and settlements | | Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | December 31, 2009 | Principal transactions | Other(1)(2) | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | $ | — | $ | 509 | $ | — | $ | 5,217 | $ | 792 | $ | 6,518 | $ | — | |||||||||||
Trading securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored | $ | 972 | $ | (158 | ) | $ | — | $ | 169 | $ | (225 | ) | $ | 758 | $ | (120 | ) | ||||||||
Prime | 384 | 33 | — | 150 | 43 | 610 | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 387 | 30 | — | 160 | (126 | ) | 451 | 54 | |||||||||||||||||
Subprime | 8,998 | 36 | — | (625 | ) | (6,524 | ) | 1,885 | (1,861 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 572 | (27 | ) | — | (259 | ) | (52 | ) | 234 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial | 2,451 | (11 | ) | — | (183 | ) | (73 | ) | 2,184 | 48 | |||||||||||||||
Total trading mortgage-backed securities | $ | 13,764 | $ | (97 | ) | $ | — | $ | (588 | ) | $ | (6,957 | ) | $ | 6,122 | $ | (1,885 | ) | |||||||
State and municipal | $ | 222 | $ | 11 | $ | — | $ | 56 | (232 | ) | $ | 57 | $ | — | |||||||||||
Foreign government | 459 | 11 | — | (186 | ) | 102 | 386 | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate | 8,620 | (75 | ) | — | (483 | ) | (1,851 | ) | 6,211 | (107 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 640 | 16 | — | (12 | ) | (111 | ) | 533 | 50 | ||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 3,006 | (77 | ) | — | 44 | 1,229 | 4,202 | (266 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 13,231 | 23 | — | (255 | ) | (11,952 | ) | 1,047 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total trading securities | $ | 39,942 | $ | (188 | ) | $ | — | $ | (1,424 | ) | $ | (19,771 | ) | $ | 18,558 | $ | (2,216 | ) | |||||||
Derivatives, net(4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts | $ | (374 | ) | $ | 665 | $ | — | $ | 337 | $ | (53 | ) | $ | 575 | $ | 447 | |||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts | (38 | ) | 344 | — | (98 | ) | 42 | 250 | 362 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity contracts | (1,110 | ) | (227 | ) | — | (282 | ) | 386 | (1,233 | ) | (558 | ) | |||||||||||||
Commodity and other contracts | (529 | ) | (116 | ) | — | 68 | 53 | (524 | ) | (444 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Credit derivatives | 5,159 | (1,275 | ) | — | (875 | ) | (936 | ) | 2,073 | (1,922 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total derivatives, net(4) | $ | 3,108 | $ | (609 | ) | $ | — | $ | (850 | ) | $ | (508 | ) | $ | 1,141 | $ | (2,115 | ) | |||||||
Investments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed | $ | 2 | $ | — | $ | (1 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Prime | 736 | — | (113 | ) | 70 | 79 | 772 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 55 | — | (23 | ) | 190 | (17 | ) | 205 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||
Subprime | 1 | — | (1 | ) | 14 | — | 14 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. Residential | — | — | 814 | — | 814 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||
Commercial | 746 | — | (449 | ) | 2 | 259 | 558 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities | $ | 1,540 | $ | — | $ | (587 | ) | $ | 1,090 | $ | 321 | $ | 2,364 | $ | 48 | ||||||||||
| | Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | Purchases, issuances and settlements | | Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3) | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | December 31, 2009 | Principal transactions | Other(1)(2) | June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Agency obligations | $ | 21 | $ | — | $ | (21 | ) | $ | — | $ | 19 | $ | 19 | $ | (1 | ) | |||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | $ | 21 | $ | — | $ | (21 | ) | $ | — | $ | 19 | $ | 19 | $ | (1 | ) | |||||||
State and municipal | $ | 217 | $ | — | $ | 7 | $ | 233 | $ | — | $ | 457 | $ | — | |||||||||
Foreign government | 270 | — | 7 | (10 | ) | 15 | 282 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate | 1,257 | — | (79 | ) | 236 | (143 | ) | 1,271 | 20 | ||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 2,513 | — | 26 | 90 | (391 | ) | 2,238 | — | |||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities | 8,272 | — | (36 | ) | 4,818 | (751 | ) | 12,303 | (95 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 560 | — | 27 | (36 | ) | 340 | 891 | 40 | |||||||||||||||
Non-marketable equity securities | 6,753 | — | 15 | (108 | ) | (99 | ) | 6,561 | (53 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total investments | $ | 21,403 | $ | — | $ | (641 | ) | $ | 6,313 | $ | (689 | ) | $ | 26,386 | $ | (39 | ) | ||||||
Loans | $ | 213 | $ | — | $ | (140 | ) | $ | 615 | $ | 2,980 | $ | 3,668 | $ | (144 | ) | |||||||
MSRs | 6,530 | — | (1,198 | ) | — | (438 | ) | 4,894 | (1,198 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis | 1,101 | — | (27 | ) | 1,983 | 32 | 3,089 | (27 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 28 | $ | — | $ | 2 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 163 | $ | 183 | $ | (13 | ) | |||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 2,056 | (98 | ) | — | (976 | ) | (87 | ) | 1,091 | (166 | ) | ||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | 774 | 52 | — | (69 | ) | (32 | ) | 621 | 56 | ||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 231 | 8 | — | (106 | ) | 328 | 445 | 14 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 9,654 | 272 | 145 | 332 | 1,172 | 10,741 | 74 | ||||||||||||||||
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis | 13 | — | (19 | ) | — | (25 | ) | 7 | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
| | Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | Purchases, issuances and settlements | | Unrealized gains (losses) still held | ||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | December 31, 2007 | Principal transactions | Other | June 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities purchased under agreements to resell | $ | 16 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (16 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Trading account assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading securities and loans | 75,573 | (13,191 | ) | — | 18,745 | (4,308 | ) | 76,819 | (10,556 | ) | |||||||||||||
Investments | 17,060 | — | (1,547 | ) | 2,971 | 8,602 | 27,086 | (267 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Loans | 9 | 11 | — | — | 125 | 145 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights | 8,380 | — | 964 | — | (410 | ) | 8,934 | 964 | |||||||||||||||
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis | 1,171 | — | 47 | 69 | 164 | 1,451 | 58 | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 56 | $ | (19 | ) | $ | — | $ | 13 | $ | 23 | $ | 111 | $ | (11 | ) | |||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase | 6,158 | 71 | — | (2,366 | ) | (555 | ) | 3,166 | (6 | ) | |||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | 473 | (8 | ) | — | 632 | 605 | 1,718 | (36 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Derivatives, net | 2,470 | 2,797 | — | 106 | 323 | 102 | 3,868 | ||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 5,016 | 149 | — | (2,283 | ) | (1,424 | ) | 1,160 | 56 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 8,953 | 409 | — | 38,019 | (8,208 | ) | 38,355 | (108 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis | 1 | — | (14 | ) | — | 11 | 26 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
| | Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | Purchases, issuances and settlements | | Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3) | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | March 31, 2009 | Principal transactions | Other(1)(2) | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored | $ | 1,316 | $ | 244 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (316 | ) | $ | 1,244 | $ | 268 | |||||||||
Prime | 582 | (20 | ) | — | — | 61 | 623 | (20 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 1,250 | (50 | ) | — | — | (423 | ) | 777 | (49 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Subprime | 10,386 | 667 | — | — | (1,052 | ) | 10,001 | 645 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 325 | (42 | ) | — | — | 62 | 345 | (34 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Commercial | 2,883 | 5 | — | — | (80 | ) | 2,808 | (26 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total trading mortgage-backed securities | $ | 16,742 | $ | 804 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (1,748 | ) | $ | 15,798 | $ | 784 | |||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Agency obligations | 51 | — | — | (3 | ) | 1 | 49 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | $ | 51 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | 49 | $ | — | |||||||||
State and municipal | $ | 198 | $ | (23 | ) | $ | — | $ | (136 | ) | $ | 70 | $ | 109 | $ | (23 | ) | |||||||
Foreign government | 1,011 | 60 | — | (390 | ) | (91 | ) | 590 | 20 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate | 9,382 | 221 | — | 249 | (417 | ) | 9,435 | 245 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 1,740 | 112 | — | 104 | (90 | ) | 1,866 | 174 | ||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 13,746 | 338 | — | 109 | 2,653 | 16,846 | 222 | |||||||||||||||||
Total trading securities | $ | 42,870 | $ | 1,512 | $ | — | $ | (67 | ) | $ | 378 | $ | 44,693 | $ | 1,422 | |||||||||
Derivatives, net(4) | $ | 3,539 | $ | (2,492 | ) | $ | — | $ | 364 | $ | (231 | ) | $ | 1,180 | $ | (2,678 | ) | |||||||
Investments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 75 | $ | 3 | $ | 78 | $ | (2 | ) | |||||||||
Prime | 1,125 | — | 159 | (171 | ) | (338 | ) | 775 | 109 |
| | Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | Purchases, issuances and settlements | | Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3) | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | March 31, 2009 | Principal transactions | Other(1)(2) | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 177 | — | 40 | 55 | (1 | ) | 271 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||
Subprime | 12 | — | (3 | ) | (10 | ) | 18 | 17 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 469 | — | 28 | (61 | ) | 283 | 719 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||
Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities | $ | 1,783 | $ | — | $ | 224 | $ | (112 | ) | $ | (35 | ) | $ | 1,860 | $ | 161 | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Agency obligations | — | — | — | 9 | — | 9 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 9 | $ | — | $ | 9 | $ | — | ||||||||||
State and municipal | $ | 207 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 45 | $ | — | $ | 252 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Foreign government | 643 | — | — | (474 | ) | (1 | ) | 168 | — | |||||||||||||||
Corporate | 992 | — | 67 | (99 | ) | 728 | 1,688 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 2,849 | — | 49 | (7 | ) | (73 | ) | 2,818 | 49 | |||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 8,742 | — | 1,243 | (386 | ) | (1,170 | ) | 8,429 | 1,261 | |||||||||||||||
Non-marketable equity securities | 7,479 | — | 21 | 619 | (319 | ) | 7,800 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||
Total investments | $ | 22,695 | $ | — | $ | 1,604 | $ | (405 | ) | $ | (870 | ) | $ | 23,024 | $ | 1,527 | ||||||||
Loans | $ | 171 | $ | — | $ | 24 | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | 196 | $ | 25 | ||||||||||
MSRs | 5,481 | — | 1,310 | — | (21 | ) | 6,770 | 1,310 | ||||||||||||||||
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis | 2,515 | — | (1,107 | ) | 329 | (92 | ) | 1,645 | $ | (1,107 | ) | |||||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 41 | $ | — | $ | (63 | ) | $ | — | $ | 8 | $ | 112 | $ | (63 | ) | ||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 10,732 | 276 | — | (3,391 | ) | 139 | 7,204 | 264 | ||||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | 1,311 | 8 | — | (434 | ) | 92 | 961 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 1,030 | 43 | — | (49 | ) | (561 | ) | 377 | 43 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 10,438 | (412 | ) | — | 51 | 300 | 11,201 | (376 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis | 1 | — | (42 | ) | — | (24 | ) | 19 | (19 | ) | ||||||||||||||
| | Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | Purchases, issuances and settlements | | Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3) | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | December 31, 2008 | Principal transactions | Other(1)(2) | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trading mortgage-backed securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored | $ | 1,325 | $ | 216 | $ | — | $ | 10 | $ | (307 | ) | $ | 1,244 | $ | 245 | |||||||||
Prime | 147 | (55 | ) | — | 439 | 92 | 623 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 1,153 | (119 | ) | — | (187 | ) | (70 | ) | 777 | (119 | ) | |||||||||||||
Subprime | 13,844 | (1,696 | ) | — | (710 | ) | (1,437 | ) | 10,001 | (1,648 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-U.S. residential | 858 | (74 | ) | — | (490 | ) | 51 | 345 | (58 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Commercial | 2,949 | (195 | ) | — | 159 | (105 | ) | 2,808 | (220 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total trading mortgage-backed securities | $ | 20,276 | $ | (1,923 | ) | $ | — | $ | (779 | ) | $ | (1,776 | ) | $ | 15,798 | $ | (1,785 | ) | ||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Agency obligations | 59 | (9 | ) | — | (3 | ) | 2 | 49 | — | |||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | $ | 59 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | — | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | 49 | $ | — | ||||||||
State and municipal | $ | 233 | $ | (22 | ) | $ | — | $ | (80 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 109 | $ | (23 | ) | ||||||
Foreign government | 1,261 | 96 | — | (367 | ) | (400 | ) | 590 | 82 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate | 13,027 | (703 | ) | — | (792 | ) | (2,097 | ) | 9,435 | 221 | ||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 1,387 | 91 | — | 121 | 267 | 1,866 | 222 | |||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 14,530 | 11 | — | (1,198 | ) | 3,503 | 16,846 | 336 | ||||||||||||||||
Total trading securities | $ | 50,773 | $ | (2,459 | ) | $ | — | $ | (3,098 | ) | $ | (523 | ) | $ | 44,693 | $ | (947 | ) | ||||||
Derivatives, net(4) | $ | 3,586 | $ | (2,376 | ) | $ | — | $ | (717 | ) | $ | 687 | $ | 1,180 | $ | (2,376 | ) | |||||||
Investments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
| | Net realized/ unrealized gains (losses) included in | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 | Purchases, issuances and settlements | | Unrealized gains (losses) still held(3) | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions of dollars | December 31, 2008 | Principal transactions | Other(1)(2) | June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government sponsored | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 75 | $ | 3 | $ | 78 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Prime | 1,163 | — | 161 | 33 | (582 | ) | 775 | 161 | ||||||||||||||||
Alt-A | 111 | — | 33 | 63 | 64 | 271 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||
Subprime | 25 | — | (9 | ) | (10 | ) | 11 | 17 | — | |||||||||||||||
Commercial | 964 | — | 9 | (463 | ) | 209 | 719 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities | $ | 2,263 | $ | — | $ | 194 | $ | (302 | ) | $ | (295 | ) | $ | 1,860 | $ | 179 | ||||||||
U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Agency obligations | — | — | — | 9 | — | 9 | — | |||||||||||||||||
Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 9 | $ | — | $ | 9 | $ | — | ||||||||||
State and municipal | $ | 222 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 30 | $ | — | $ | 252 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Foreign government | 571 | — | — | (402 | ) | (1 | ) | 168 | — | |||||||||||||||
Corporate | 1,019 | — | 44 | 654 | (29 | ) | 1,688 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity securities | 3,807 | — | (480 | ) | (130 | ) | (379 | ) | 2,818 | (480 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other debt securities | 11,324 | — | (427 | ) | (948 | ) | (1,520 | ) | 8,429 | (427 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-Marketable equity securities | 9,067 | — | (706 | ) | (239 | ) | (322 | ) | 7,800 | (779 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total investments | $ | 28,273 | $ | — | $ | (1,375 | ) | $ | (1,328 | ) | $ | (2,546 | ) | $ | 23,024 | $ | (1,472 | ) | ||||||
Loans | 160 | — | 19 | — | 17 | 196 | 19 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights | 5,657 | — | 1,440 | — | (327 | ) | 6,770 | 1,440 | ||||||||||||||||
Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis | 359 | — | 552 | 756 | (22 | ) | 1,645 | 552 | ||||||||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 54 | $ | — | $ | (59 | ) | $ | — | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 112 | $ | (94 | ) | |||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 11,167 | 308 | — | (3,720 | ) | 65 | 7,204 | 301 | ||||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold, not yet purchased | 653 | 44 | — | (15 | ) | 367 | 961 | 43 | ||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 1,329 | (65 | ) | — | (746 | ) | (271 | ) | 377 | (65 | ) | |||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 11,198 | 36 | — | (326 | ) | 365 | 11,201 | (50 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis | 1 | — | (43 | ) | — | (25 | ) | 19 | (43 | ) | ||||||||||||||
The following is a discussion of the changes to the Level 3 balances for each of the roll-forward tables presented above.
The significant changes from March 31, 2010 to June 30, 2010 in Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:
The significant changes from December 31, 2009 to June 30, 2010 in Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:
The significant changes from March 31, 2009 to June 30, 2009 Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:
The significant changes from December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:
as well as losses on private equity investments and real estate fund investments. Offsetting this loss on the retained highly leveraged debt securities is a gain on the corresponding cash flow hedge that is reflected in AOCI and on the line Other Financial Assetsfinancial assets measured on a recurring basis within the fair value hierarchy table presented above as a Level 3 asset.
The reductions in securities sold under agreement to repurchase of $3 billion, and short-term borrowings of $5 billion, which were driven primarily by theCompany did not have any significant transfers of certain positions from Level 3 to Levelassets or liabilities between Levels 1 and 2 as valuation methodology inputs considered to be unobservable were demonstrated to be insignificant toof the overall valuation.
Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurringnon-recurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above.
These include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during thethese periods as a result of an impairment. In addition, these assets such asinclude loans held for saleheld-for-sale (HFS) that are measured at the lower of cost or market (LOCOM), that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period.
The fair value of loans measured on a LOCOM basis is determined where possible using quoted secondary-market prices. Such loans are generally classified inas Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy given the level of activity in the market and the frequency of available quotes. If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan.
The following table presents all loans held-for-saleHFS that are carried at LOCOM as of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 20082009 (in billions):
| Aggregate Cost | Fair Value | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 30, 2009 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 0.1 | $ | 0.1 | $ | — | |||||
December 31, 2008 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 0.8 | 1.3 | |||||||||
| Aggregate cost | Fair value | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
June 30, 2010 | $ | 1.5 | $ | 1.4 | $ | 0.4 | $ | 1.0 | |||||
December 31, 2009 | $ | 2.5 | $ | 1.6 | $ | 0.3 | $ | 1.3 | |||||
18. FAIR-VALUE17. FAIR VALUE ELECTIONS (SFAS 155/ASC 815-15-25, SFAS 156/ASC 860-50-35 and SFAS 159/ASC 825-10)
Under SFAS 159 (ASC 825-10), theThe Company may elect to report most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in earnings. After the initial adoption, theThe election is made upon the acquisition of an eligible financial asset, financial liability or firm commitment or when certain specified reconsideration events occur. The fair-value election may not be revoked once an election is made.
Additionally, the transition provisions of SFAS 159 (ASC 825-10) permit a one-time election for existing positions at the adoption date with a cumulative-effect adjustment included in opening retained earnings and future changes in fair value reported in earnings.
The Company also has elected the fair-value accounting provisions permitted under SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25) and SFAS 156 (ASC 860-50-35) for certain assets and liabilities. In accordance with SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25), which was primarily adopted on a prospective basis, hybrid financial instruments, such as structured notes containing embedded derivatives that otherwise would require bifurcation, as well as certain interest-only instruments, may be accounted for at fair value if the Company makes an irrevocable election to do so on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The changes in fair value are recorded in current earnings. Additional discussion regarding the applicable areas in which SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25) was adoptedfair value elections were made is presented in Note 1716 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS 156 (ASC 860-50-35) requires allAll servicing rights tomust now be recognized initially at fair value. At its initial adoption, the standard permits a one-time irrevocable election to re-measure each class of servicing rights at fair value, with the changes in fair value recorded in current earnings. The classes of servicing rights are identified based on the availability of market inputs used in determining their fair values and the methods for managing their risks. The Company has elected fair-value accounting for its mortgage and student loan classes of servicing rights. The impact of adopting this standard was not material. See Note 1514 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of mortgage servicing rights.
Table of ContentsMSRs.
The following table presents, as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of those positions selected for fair-value accounting, in accordance with SFAS 159 (ASC 825-10), SFAS 156 (ASC 860-50-35), and SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25), as well as the changes in fair value for the six months ended June 30, 20092010 and June 30, 2008.2009:
| Fair Value at | Changes in fair value gains (losses) for six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | 2009 | 2008(1) | ||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed(2) | $ | 73,755 | $ | 70,305 | $ | (1,256 | ) | $ | 120 | |||||
Trading account assets: | ||||||||||||||
Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities originally classified as available-for-sale | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (13 | ) | |||||
Selected letters of credit hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes | 3 | — | 36 | (2 | ) | |||||||||
Certain credit products | 15,101 | 16,254 | 3,963 | (1,172 | ) | |||||||||
Certain hybrid financial instruments | 11 | 33 | — | 3 | ||||||||||
Retained interests from asset securitizations | 2,285 | 3,026 | 1,279 | 307 | ||||||||||
Total trading account assets | $ | 17,400 | $ | 19,313 | $ | 5,278 | $ | (877 | ) | |||||
Investments: | ||||||||||||||
Certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures | $ | 387 | $ | 469 | $ | (44 | ) | $ | (12 | ) | ||||
Other | 230 | 295 | (85 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||
Total investments | $ | 617 | $ | 764 | $ | (129 | ) | $ | (32 | ) | ||||
Loans: | ||||||||||||||
Certain credit products | $ | 1,373 | $ | 2,315 | $ | 8 | $ | (11 | ) | |||||
Certain mortgage loans | 32 | 36 | (4 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||
Certain hybrid financial instruments | 426 | 381 | (37 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||||
Total loans | $ | 1,831 | $ | 2,732 | $ | (33 | ) | $ | (42 | ) | ||||
Other assets: | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights | $ | 6,770 | $ | 5,657 | $ | 1,440 | $ | 964 | ||||||
Certain mortgage loans | 8,115 | 4,273 | 27 | (48 | ) | |||||||||
Certain equity method investments | 764 | 936 | 94 | (110 | ) | |||||||||
Total other assets | $ | 15,649 | $ | 10,866 | $ | 1,561 | $ | 806 | ||||||
Total | $ | 109,252 | $ | 103,980 | $ | 5,421 | $ | (25 | ) | |||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: | ||||||||||||||
Certain structured liabilities | $ | 246 | $ | 320 | $ | 1 | $ | 10 | ||||||
Certain hybrid financial instruments | 1,861 | 2,286 | (431 | ) | 297 | |||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits | $ | 2,107 | $ | 2,606 | $ | (430 | ) | $ | 307 | |||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | ||||||||||||||
Selected portfolios of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned(2) | $ | 116,133 | $ | 138,866 | $ | 215 | $ | (10 | ) | |||||
Trading account liabilities: | ||||||||||||||
Selected letters of credit hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes | $ | — | $ | 72 | $ | 37 | $ | — | ||||||
Certain hybrid financial instruments | 5,745 | 4,679 | (772 | ) | 1,058 | |||||||||
Total trading account liabilities | $ | 5,745 | $ | 4,751 | $ | (735 | ) | $ | 1,058 | |||||
Short-term borrowings: | ||||||||||||||
Certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings | $ | 240 | $ | 2,303 | $ | 73 | $ | 9 | ||||||
Certain hybrid financial instruments | 648 | 2,112 | (27 | ) | 69 | |||||||||
Certain structured liabilities | 3 | 3 | — | — | ||||||||||
Certain non-structured liabilities | 2,467 | 13,189 | (24 | ) | — | |||||||||
Total short-term borrowings | $ | 3,358 | $ | 17,607 | $ | 22 | $ | 78 | ||||||
Long-term debt: | ||||||||||||||
Certain structured liabilities | $ | 3,069 | $ | 3,083 | $ | 81 | $ | 230 | ||||||
Certain non-structured liabilities | 6,164 | 7,189 | 101 | 2,423 | ||||||||||
Certain hybrid financial instruments | 15,457 | 16,991 | (222 | ) | 713 | |||||||||
Total long-term debt | $ | 24,690 | $ | 27,263 | $ | (40 | ) | $ | 3,366 | |||||
Total | $ | 152,033 | $ | 191,093 | $ | (968 | ) | $ | 4,799 | |||||
| Fair value at | Changes in fair value gains (losses) for the six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009(1) | 2010 | 2009(1) | ||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed(2) | $ | 98,099 | $ | 87,837 | $ | 528 | $ | (1,256 | ) | |||||
Trading account assets | $ | 13,329 | $ | 16,725 | $ | 17 | $ | 5,278 | ||||||
Investments | $ | 437 | $ | 574 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | (129 | ) | ||||
Loans | ||||||||||||||
Certain corporate loans(3) | $ | 2,358 | $ | 1,405 | $ | (137 | ) | $ | 42 | |||||
Certain consumer loans(3) | 2,620 | 34 | 70 | (4 | ) | |||||||||
Total loans | $ | 4,978 | $ | 1,439 | $ | (67 | ) | $ | 38 | |||||
Other assets | ||||||||||||||
MSRs | $ | 4,894 | $ | 6,530 | $ | (1,198 | ) | $ | 1,440 | |||||
Certain mortgage loans (HFS) | 3,834 | 3,338 | 147 | 27 | ||||||||||
Certain equity method investments | 657 | 598 | (31 | ) | 94 | |||||||||
Total other assets | $ | 9,385 | $ | 10,466 | $ | (1,082 | ) | $ | 1,561 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 126,228 | $ | 117,041 | $ | (613 | ) | $ | 5,492 | |||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits | $ | 1,387 | $ | 1,545 | $ | 2 | $ | 21 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | ||||||||||||||
Selected portfolios of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned(2) | $ | 119,282 | $ | 104,030 | $ | 91 | $ | 215 | ||||||
Trading account liabilities | $ | 4,200 | $ | 5,325 | $ | 145 | $ | (735 | ) | |||||
Short-term borrowings | $ | 1,650 | $ | 639 | $ | 57 | $ | 22 | ||||||
Long-term debt | $ | 25,858 | $ | 25,942 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (40 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | 152,377 | $ | 137,481 | $ | 292 | $ | (517 | ) | |||||
Own-Credit Own Credit Valuation Adjustment
The fair value of debt liabilities for which the fair-valuefair value option wasis elected (other than non-recourse and similar liabilities) wasis impacted by the narrowing or widening of the Company's credit spread.spreads. The estimated change in the fair value of these debt liabilities due to such changes in the Company's own credit risk (or instrument-specific credit risk) was a loss of$455 million gain and a $1.608 billion and $228 millionloss for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and June 30, 2008, respectively,a gain of $450 million and a loss of $1.428 billion and a gain of $1.051$1.429 billion for the six months ended June 30, 20092010 and June 30, 2008,2009, respectively. Changes in fair value resulting from changes in instrument-specific credit risk were estimated by incorporating the Company's current observable credit spreads into the relevant valuation technique used to value each liability as described above.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company changed the source of its credit spreads from those observed in the credit default swap market to those observed in the bond market. Had this modification been in place since the beginning of 2008, the change in the Company's own credit spread would have resulted in a loss of $60 million and a gain of $1.19 billion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
SFAS 159 The Fair-ValueFair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (ASC 825-10)
Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities
The Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities (Legg shares) were acquired in connection with the sale of Citigroup's Asset Management business in December 2005. Prior to the election of fair-value option accounting, the shares were classified as available-for-sale securities with the unrealized loss of $232 million as of December 31, 2006 included inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss). In connection with the Company's adoption of SFAS 159 (ASC 825-10), this unrealized loss was recorded as a reduction of January 1, 2007Retained earnings as part of the cumulative-effect adjustment.
During the first quarter of 2008, the Company sold the remaining 8.4 million Legg shares at a pretax loss of $10.3 million ($6.7 million after-tax).
Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings
The Company elected the fair-valuefair value option retrospectively for our United States and United Kingdomcertain portfolios of fixed-income securities purchased under agreements to resell and fixed-income securities sold under agreements to repurchase (and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings). The fair-value option was also elected prospectively on broker-dealer entities in the second quarter of 2007 for certain portfolios of fixed-income securities lendingUnited States, United Kingdom and borrowing transactions based in Japan. In each case, the election was made because the related interest-rate risk is managed on a portfolio basis, primarily with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. Previously, these positions were accounted for on an accrual basis.
Changes in fair value for transactions in these portfolios are recorded inPrincipal transactions. The related interest revenue and interest expense are measured based on the contractual rates specified in the transactions and are reported as interest revenue and expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes
The Company has elected the fair-valuefair value option for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-valuefair value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-valuefair value basis and to mitigatemitigates accounting mismatches.
The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $2$1.8 billion as of June 30, 20092010 and $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2008.2009. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008.2009.
These items have been classified inTrading account assets orTrading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of these items are classified inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.
Certain loans and other credit products
Citigroup has elected the fair-valuefair value option for certain originated and purchased loans, including certain unfunded loan products, such as guarantees and letters of credit, executed by Citigroup's trading businesses. None of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment. Significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term, or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the Company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party. Citigroup has elected the fair-valuefair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. Fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the Company, including where those management objectives would not be met.
The following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value:value at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
| June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Trading assets | Loans | Trading assets | Loans | |||||||||
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet | $ | 15,101 | $ | 1,373 | $ | 16,254 | $ | 2,315 | |||||
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value | $ | 2,967 | $ | (12 | ) | $ | 6,501 | $ | 3 | ||||
Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due | $ | 692 | $ | 1,097 | $ | 77 | $ | 1,113 | |||||
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due | $ | 480 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 190 | $ | (4 | ) | |||
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Trading assets | Loans | Trading assets | Loans | |||||||||
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet | $ | 13,299 | $ | 1,258 | $ | 14,338 | $ | 945 | |||||
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value | 697 | (62 | ) | 390 | (44 | ) | |||||||
Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due | 220 | — | 312 | — | |||||||||
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due | 270 | — | 267 | — | |||||||||
In addition to the amounts reported above, $200$416 million and $72$200 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-valuefair value accounting werewas outstanding as of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively.
Changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported asInterest revenue on tradingTrading account assets or loansloan interest depending on theirthe balance sheet classifications.classifications of the credit products. The changes in fair value for the six months ended June 30, 20092010 and 20082009 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a gain of $27 million and a loss of $48 million and $25 million, respectively.
Certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments
Citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation. The Company has elected the fair-valuefair value option for certain of these ventures, because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in ourCiti's investment companies, which are reported at fair value. The fair-valuefair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments. As required by SFAS 159 (ASC 825-10), allAll investments (debt and equity) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value. These investments are classified asInvestments on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for underwhich the equity method. The Company elected fair-valuefair value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity. Since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value, the impact of applying the equity method to Citigroup's investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-valuefair value accounting. Thus, this fair-value election had no impact on openingRetained earnings. These investments are classified asOther assets on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Changes in the fair values of these investments are classified inOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.
Certain structured liabilities
The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation or currency risks ("structured liabilities"). The Company elected the fair-value option, because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair-value basis. These positions will continue to be classified as debt, deposits or derivatives (Trading account liabilities) on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form.
For those structured liabilities classified asLong-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate fair value exceeds the aggregate unpaid principal balance of such instruments by $13 million as of June 30, 2009 and the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $277 million as of December 31, 2008.
The change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.
Related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Income Statement.
Certain non-structured liabilities
The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ("non-structured liabilities"). The Company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings. The election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications. These positions are reported inShort-term borrowings andLong-term debt on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.
For those non-structured liabilities classified asShort-term borrowings for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $0.4 million as of June 30, 2009 and the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal balance by $5 million as December 31, 2008.
For non-structured liabilities classified asLong-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate fair value exceeded the aggregate unpaid principal balance of such instruments by $449 million and the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $97 million as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.
Related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Income Statement.
Certain mortgage loans (HFS)
Citigroup has elected the fair-valuefair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for-sale.HFS. These loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments. The Company has elected the fair-valuefair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. The fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment, as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments. This election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after September 1, 2007.
The following table provides information about certain mortgage loans HFS carried at fair value:value at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet | $ | 8,115 | $ | 4,273 | |||
Aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance | $ | 84 | $ | 138 | |||
Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due | $ | 7 | $ | 9 | |||
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due | $ | 4 | $ | 2 | |||
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet | $ | 3,834 | $ | 3,338 | |||
Aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance | 172 | 55 | |||||
Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due | 2 | 4 | |||||
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due | — | 3 | |||||
The changes in fair values of these mortgage loans isare reported inOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. The changes in fair value during the six months ended June 30, 20092010 and June 30, 20082009 due to instrument-specific credit risk resulted in a $10$3 million loss and $24$10 million loss, respectively. Related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Items selected for fair-value accounting in accordance with SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25) and SFAS 156 (ASC 860-50-35)
Certain hybrid financial instrumentsConsolidated VIEs
The Company has elected to apply fair-value accounting under SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25)the fair value option for certain hybrid financialall qualified assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate, foreign exchange or inflation (e.g., equity, credit or commodity risks). In addition,of certain VIEs that were consolidated upon the adoption of SFAS 166/167 on January 1, 2010, including certain private label mortgage securitizations, mutual fund deferred sales commissions and collateralized loan obligation VIEs. The Company elected the fair value option for these VIEs as the Company has elected fair-value accounting under SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25)believes this method better reflects the economic risks, since substantially all of the Company's retained interests in these entities are carried at fair value.
With respect to the consolidated mortgage VIEs, the Company determined the fair value for residual interests retainedthe mortgage loans and long-term debt utilizing internal valuation techniques. The fair value of the long-term debt measured using internal valuation techniques is verified, where possible, to prices obtained from securitizing certain financial assets.
independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources and may apply matrix pricing for similar securities when no price is observable. Security pricing associated with long-term debt that is verified is classified as Level 2 and non-verified debt is classified as Level 3. The Company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair-value basis. In addition, the accounting for these instrumentsfair value of mortgage loans of each VIE is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivativesderived from the host contracts and accounting for each separately. The hybrid financial instrumentssecurity pricing. When substantially all of the long-term debt of a VIE is valued using Level 2 inputs, the corresponding mortgage loans are classified asTrading account assets, Loans,Deposits,Trading account liabilities (for prepaid derivatives),Short-term borrowings orLong-Term Debt on Level 2. Otherwise, the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form, while residual interests in certain securitizationsmortgage loans of a VIE are classified asTrading account assets. Level 3.
For hybrid financial instrumentsWith respect to the consolidated mortgage VIEs for which fair-value accounting has been elected under SFAS 155 (ASC 815-15-25) and that are classified asLong-term debt, the aggregate unpaid principal exceeds the aggregate fair value by $395 million and $1.9 billion as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The difference for those instrumentsoption was elected, the mortgage loans are classified asLoans is immaterial.
Changeson Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments, which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest,of the loans are recorded inreported asPrincipal transactionsOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately fromRelated interest revenue is measured based on the change in fair valuecontractual interest rates and reported asInterest revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Information about these mortgage loans is included in the table below. The change in fair value of these loans due to instrument-specific credit risk was a loss of $180 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Table The debt issued by these consolidated VIEs is classified as long-term debt on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The changes in fair value for the majority of Contentsthese liabilities are reported inOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income. The aggregate unpaid principal balance of long-term debt of these consolidated VIEs exceeded the aggregate fair value by $1.6 billion as of June 30, 2010.
The following table provides information about corporate and consumer loans of consolidated VIEs carried at fair value:
| June 30, 2010 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Corporate Loans | Consumer Loans | |||||
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet | $ | 680 | $ | 2,590 | |||
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value | 495 | 973 | |||||
Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due | 95 | 269 | |||||
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due | 148 | 261 | |||||
Mortgage servicing rights
The Company accounts for mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) at fair value in accordance with SFAS 156 (ASC 860-50-35).value. Fair value for MSRs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates. The model assumptions used in the valuation of MSRs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates. The fair value of MSRs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. In managing this risk, the Company hedges a significant portion of the values of its MSRs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts, forward-purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and purchased securities classified as trading. See Note 15Note14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of MSRs.
These MSRs, which totaled $6.8$4.894 billion and $5.7$6.530 billion as of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively, are classified asMortgage servicing rights on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of MSRs are recorded inCommissions and feesOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.
Certain structured liabilities
The Company has elected the fair value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation, currency, equity, referenced credit or commodity risks (structured liabilities). The Company elected the fair value option, because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair value basis. These positions will continue to be classified as debt, deposits or derivatives (Trading account liabilities) on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form.
The change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Changes in fair value for structured debt with embedded equity, referenced credit or commodity underlyings includes an economic component for accrued interest. For structured debt that contains embedded interest rate, inflation or currency risks, related interest expense is measured based on the contracted interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
Certain non-structured liabilities
The Company has elected the fair value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates (non-structured liabilities). The Company has elected the fair value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings. The election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications. These positions are reported inShort-term borrowings andLong-term debt on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.
Related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
The following table provides information about long-term debt, excluding the debt issued by the consolidated VIEs, carried at fair value at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet | $ | 20,440 | $ | 25,942 | |||
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value | 2,815 | 3,399 |
The following table provides information about short-term borrowings carried at fair value:
In millions of dollars | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet | $ | 1,650 | $ | 639 | |||
Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value | 155 | 53 |
19.18. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (SFAS 107/ASC 825-10-50)
Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The table below presents the carrying value and fair value of Citigroup's financial instruments. The disclosure excludes leases, affiliate investments, pension and benefit obligations and insurance policy claim reserves. In addition, contract-holder fund amounts exclude certain insurance contracts. Also as required, the disclosure excludes the effect of taxes, any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the entire holdings of a particular instrument, excess fair value associated with deposits with no fixed maturity and other expenses that would be incurred in a market transaction. In addition, the table excludes the values of non-financial assets and liabilities, as well as a wide range of franchise, relationship and intangible values (but includes mortgage servicing rights), which are integral to a full assessment of Citigroup's financial position and the value of its net assets.
The fair value represents management's best estimates based on a range of methodologies and assumptions. The carrying value of short-term financial instruments not accounted for at fair value, under SFAS 155(ASC 815-15-25) or SFAS 159(ASC 825-10), as well as receivables and payables arising in the ordinary course of business, approximates fair value because of the relatively short period of time between their origination and expected realization. Quoted market prices are used when available for investments and for both trading and end-user derivatives, as well as for liabilities, such as long-term debt, with quoted prices. For performing loans not accounted for at fair value, under SFAS 155(ASC 815-15-25) or SFAS 159(ASC 825-10), contractual cash flows are discounted at quoted secondary market rates or estimated market rates if available. Otherwise, sales of comparable loan portfolios or current market origination rates for loans with similar terms and risk characteristics are used. For loans with doubt as to collectibility,collectability, expected cash flows are discounted using an appropriate rate considering the time of collection and the premium for the uncertainty of the cash flows. The value of collateral is also considered. For liabilities such as long-term debt not accounted for at fair value under SFAS 155(ASC 815-15-25) or SFAS 159(ASC 825-10) and without quoted market prices, market borrowing rates of interest are used to discount contractual cash flows.
| June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Carrying value | Estimated fair value | Carrying value | Estimated fair value | |||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||
Investments | $ | 266.8 | $ | 261.6 | $ | 256.0 | $ | 251.9 | |||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 179.5 | 179.5 | 184.1 | 184.1 | |||||||||
Trading account assets | 325.0 | 325.0 | 377.6 | 377.6 | |||||||||
Loans(1) | 602.6 | 601.3 | 660.9 | 642.7 | |||||||||
Other financial assets(2) | 314.4 | 314.4 | 316.6 | 316.6 | |||||||||
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Carrying value | Estimated fair value | Carrying value | Estimated fair value | |||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||
Investments | $ | 317.1 | $ | 317.6 | $ | 306.1 | $ | 307.6 | |||||
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell | 230.8 | 230.8 | 222.0 | 222.0 | |||||||||
Trading account assets | 309.4 | 309.4 | 342.8 | 342.8 | |||||||||
Loans(1) | 643.5 | 632.5 | 552.5 | 542.8 | |||||||||
Other financial assets(2) | 286.6 | 286.6 | 290.9 | 290.9 | |||||||||
| June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Carrying value | Estimated fair value | Carrying value | Estimated fair value | |||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Deposits | $ | 804.7 | $ | 803.5 | $ | 774.2 | $ | 772.9 | |||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 172.0 | 172.0 | 205.3 | 205.3 | |||||||||
Trading account liabilities | 119.3 | 119.3 | 167.5 | 167.5 | |||||||||
Long-term debt | 348.0 | 315.5 | 359.6 | 317.1 | |||||||||
Other financial liabilities(3) | 203.7 | 203.7 | 253.9 | 253.9 | |||||||||
| June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars | Carrying value | Estimated fair value | Carrying value | Estimated fair value | |||||||||
Liabilities | |||||||||||||
Deposits | $ | 814.0 | $ | 812.2 | $ | 835.9 | $ | 834.5 | |||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase | 196.1 | 196.1 | 154.3 | 154.3 | |||||||||
Trading account liabilities | 131.0 | 131.0 | 137.5 | 137.5 | |||||||||
Long-term debt | 413.3 | 408.8 | 364.0 | 354.8 | |||||||||
Other financial liabilities(3) | 192.6 | 192.6 | 175.8 | 175.8 | |||||||||
Fair values vary from period to period based on changes in a wide range of factors, including interest rates, credit quality, and market perceptions of value and as existing assets and liabilities run off and new transactions are entered into.
The estimated fair values of loans reflect changes in credit status since the loans were made, changes in interest rates in the case of fixed-rate loans, and premium values at origination of certain loans. The carrying values (reduced by theAllowance for loan losses) exceeded the estimated fair values of Citigroup's loans, in aggregate, by $1.3$11.0 billion and $18.2$9.7 billion at June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively. At June 30, 2009, the carrying values net of the allowance exceeded estimated fair value for consumer loans by $2.1 billion, and the estimated fair values exceeded2010, the carrying values, net of allowances, exceeded the estimated values by $0.8$9.1 billion and $1.9 billion for consumer loans and corporate loans.loans, respectively.
Citigroup has determined that it isThe estimated fair values of the Company's corporate unfunded lending commitments at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $5.4 billion and $5.0 billion, respectively. The Company does not practicable to estimate the fair value on an ongoing basisvalues of consumer unfunded lending commitments, which are generally cancellable by providing notice to the loss sharing program with the United States Government because the program is a unique contract tailored to fit the specific portfolio of assets held by Citigroup, contains various public policy and other non-financial elements, and provides a significant Tier 1 Capital benefit.borrower.
20.19. GUARANTEES
The Company provides a variety of guarantees and indemnifications to Citigroup customers to enhance their credit standing and enable them to complete a wide variety of business transactions. FASB Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" (FIN 45/ASC 460-10), provides initial measurement and disclosure guidance in accounting for guarantees. FIN 45(ASC 460-10) requires that, forFor certain contracts meeting the definition of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize, at inception, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee.
In addition, the guarantor must disclose the maximum potential amount of future payments the guarantor could be required to make under the guarantee, if there were a total default by the guaranteed parties. The determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. Such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.
The following tables present information about the Company's guarantees at June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:
| Maximum potential amount of future payments | | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars at June 30, except carrying value in millions | Expire within 1 year | Expire after 1 year | Total amount outstanding | Carrying value (in millions) | |||||||||
2009 | |||||||||||||
Financial standby letters of credit | $ | 52.2 | $ | 50.6 | $ | 102.8 | $ | 297.9 | |||||
Performance guarantees | 9.7 | 5.6 | 15.3 | 31.2 | |||||||||
Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees | 9.1 | 3.1 | 12.2 | 1,393.4 | |||||||||
Loans sold with recourse | — | 0.3 | 0.3 | 55.2 | |||||||||
Securities lending indemnifications(1) | 55.3 | — | 55.3 | — | |||||||||
Credit card merchant processing(1) | 54.2 | — | 54.2 | — | |||||||||
Custody indemnifications and other | — | 25.2 | 25.2 | 152.8 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 180.5 | $ | 84.8 | $ | 265.3 | $ | 1,930.5 | |||||
| Maximum potential amount of future payments | | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars at December 31, except carrying value in millions | Expire within 1 year | Expire after 1 year | Total amount outstanding | Carrying value (in millions) | |||||||||
2008 | |||||||||||||
Financial standby letters of credit | $ | 31.6 | $ | 62.6 | $ | 94.2 | $ | 289.0 | |||||
Performance guarantees | 9.4 | 6.9 | 16.3 | 23.6 | |||||||||
Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees(2) | 7.6 | 7.2 | 14.8 | 1,308.4 | |||||||||
Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows(1) | — | 0.3 | 0.3 | — | |||||||||
Loans sold with recourse | — | 0.3 | 0.3 | 56.4 | |||||||||
Securities lending indemnifications(1) | 47.6 | — | 47.6 | — | |||||||||
Credit card merchant processing(1) | 56.7 | — | 56.7 | — | |||||||||
Custody indemnifications and other | — | 21.6 | 21.6 | 149.2 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 152.9 | $ | 98.9 | $ | 251.8 | $ | 1,826.6 | |||||
| Maximum potential amount of future payments | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars at June 30, except carrying value in millions | Expire within 1 year | Expire after 1 year | Total amount outstanding | Carrying value (in millions) | |||||||||
2010 | |||||||||||||
Financial standby letters of credit | $ | 35.8 | $ | 49.0 | $ | 84.8 | $ | 280.6 | |||||
Performance guarantees | 8.6 | 4.3 | 12.9 | 27.5 | |||||||||
Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees | 3.0 | 4.3 | 7.3 | 954.9 | |||||||||
Loans sold with recourse | — | 0.3 | 0.3 | 75.0 | |||||||||
Securities lending indemnifications(1) | 68.9 | — | 68.9 | — | |||||||||
Credit card merchant processing(1) | 61.1 | — | 61.1 | — | |||||||||
Custody indemnifications and other | — | 35.2 | 35.2 | 275.7 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 177.4 | $ | 93.1 | $ | 270.5 | $ | 1,613.7 | |||||
| Maximum potential amount of future payments | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars at December 31, except carrying value in millions | Expire within 1 year | Expire after 1 year | Total amount outstanding | Carrying value (in millions) | |||||||||
2009 | |||||||||||||
Financial standby letters of credit | $ | 41.4 | $ | 48.0 | $ | 89.4 | $ | 438.8 | |||||
Performance guarantees | 9.4 | 4.5 | 13.9 | 32.4 | |||||||||
Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees | 4.1 | 3.6 | 7.7 | 569.2 | |||||||||
Loans sold with recourse | — | 0.3 | 0.3 | 76.6 | |||||||||
Securities lending indemnifications(1) | 64.5 | — | 64.5 | — | |||||||||
Credit card merchant processing(1) | 59.7 | — | 59.7 | — | |||||||||
Custody indemnifications and other | — | 33.5 | 33.5 | 121.4 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 179.1 | $ | 89.9 | $ | 269.0 | $ | 1,238.4 | |||||
Financial Standby Lettersstandby letters of Creditcredit
Citigroup issues standby letters of credit which substitute its own credit for that of the borrower. If a letter of credit is drawn down, the borrower is obligated to repay Citigroup. Standby letters of credit protect a third party from defaults on contractual obligations. Financial standby letters of credit include guarantees of payment of insurance premiums and reinsurance risks that support industrial revenue bond underwriting and settlement of payment obligations to clearing houses, and also support options and purchases of securities or are in lieu of escrow deposit accounts. Financial standbys also backstop loans, credit facilities, promissory notes and trade acceptances.
Performance Guaranteesguarantees
Performance guarantees and letters of credit are issued to guarantee a customer's tender bid on a construction or systems-installation project or to guarantee completion of such projects in accordance with contract terms. They are also issued to support a customer's obligation to supply specified products, commodities, or maintenance or warranty services to a third party.
Derivative Instruments Consideredinstruments considered to Be Guaranteesbe guarantees
Derivatives are financial instruments whose cash flows are based on a notional amount or an underlying instrument, where there is little or no initial investment, and whose terms require or permit net settlement. Derivatives may be used for a variety of reasons, including risk management, or to enhance returns. Financial institutions often act as intermediaries for their clients, helping clients reduce their risks. However, derivatives may also be used to take a risk position.
The derivative instruments considered to be guarantees, which are presented in the tabletables above, include only those instruments that require Citi to make payments to the
counterparty based on changes in an underlying that is related to an asset, a liability, or an equity security held by the guaranteed party. More specifically, derivative instruments considered to be guarantees include certain over-the-counter written put options where the counterparty is not a bank, hedge fund or broker-dealer (such counterparties are considered to be dealers in these markets and may therefore not hold the underlying instruments). However, credit derivatives sold by the Company are excluded from this presentation.presentation, as they are disclosed separately in Note 15. In addition, non-credit derivative contracts that are cash settled and for which the Company is unable to assert that it is probable the counterparty held the underlying instrument at the inception of the contract also are excluded from the disclosure above. The Company's credit derivative portfolio as protection seller (guarantor) is presented in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Derivative Activities."
In instances where the Company's maximum potential future payment is unlimited, the notional amount of the contract is disclosed.
Guarantees of Collection of Contractual Cash Flows
Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows protect investors in credit card receivables securitization trusts from loss of interest relating to insufficient collections on the underlying receivables in the trusts. The notional amount of these guarantees as of December 31, 2008, was $300 million. No such guarantees were outstanding at June 30, 2009.
Loans Soldsold with Recourserecourse
Loans sold with recourse represent the Company's obligations to reimburse the buyers for loan losses under certain circumstances. Recourse refers to the clause in a sales agreement under which a lender will fully reimburse the buyer/investor for any losses resulting from the purchased loans. This may be accomplished by the seller's taking back any loans that become delinquent.
Securities Lending Indemnificationslending indemnifications
Owners of securities frequently lend those securities for a fee to other parties who may sell them short or deliver them to another party to satisfy some other obligation. Banks may administer such securities lending programs for their clients. Securities lending indemnifications are issued by the bank to guarantee that a securities lending customer will be made whole in the event that the security borrower does not return the security subject to the lending agreement and collateral held is insufficient to cover the market value of the security.
Credit Card Merchant Processingcard merchant processing
Credit card merchant processing guarantees represent the Company's indirect obligations in connection with the processing of private label and bankcard transactions on behalf of merchants.
Citigroup's primary credit card business is the issuance of credit cards to individuals. In addition, the Company provides transaction processing services to various merchants with respect to bankcard and private-label cards. In the event of a billing dispute with respect to a bankcard transaction between a merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholder's favor, the third party holds the primary contingent liability to credit or refund the amount to the cardholder and charge back the transaction to the merchant. If the third party is unable to collect this amount from the merchant, it bears the loss for the amount of the credit or refund paid to the cardholder.
The Company continues to have the primary contingent liability with respect to its portfolio of private-label merchants. The risk of loss is mitigated as the cash flows between the third party or the Company and the merchant are settled on a net basis and the third party or the Company has the right to offset any payments with cash flows otherwise due to the merchant. To further mitigate this risk, the third party or the Company may require a merchant to make an escrow deposit, delay settlement, or include event triggers to provide the third party or the Company with more financial and operational control in the event of the financial deterioration of the merchant, or require various credit enhancements (including letters of credit and bank guarantees). In the unlikely event that a private labelprivate-label merchant is unable to deliver products, services or a refund to its private labelprivate-label cardholders, Citigroup is contingently liable to credit or refund cardholders. In addition, although a third party holds the primary contingent liability with respect to the processing of bankcard transactions, in the event that the third party does not have sufficient collateral from the merchant or sufficient financial resources of its own to provide the credit or refunds to the cardholders, Citigroup would be liable to credit or refund the cardholders.
The Company's maximum potential contingent liability related to both bankcard and private labelprivate-label merchant processing services is estimated to be the total volume of credit card transactions that meet the requirements to be valid chargeback transactions at any given time. At June 30, 20092010 and
December 31, 2008,2009, this maximum potential exposure was estimated to be $54$61 billion and $57$60 billion, respectively.
However, the Company believes that the maximum exposure is not representative of the actual potential loss exposure based on the Company's historical experience and its position as a secondary guarantor (in the case of bankcards). In most cases, this contingent liability is unlikely to arise, as most products and services are delivered when purchased, and amounts are refunded when items are returned to merchants. The Company assesses the probability and amount of its contingent liability related to merchant processing based on the financial strength of the primary guarantor (in the case of bankcards) and the extent and nature of unresolved chargebacks and its historical loss experience. At June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the estimated losses incurred and the carrying amounts of the Company's contingent obligations related to merchant processing activities were immaterial.
Custody Indemnificationsindemnifications
Custody indemnifications are issued to guarantee that custody clients will be made whole in the event that a third-party subcustodian or depository institution fails to safeguard clients' assets.
Other
As of December 31, 2008, Citigroup carried a reserve of $149 millionhas an accrual related to certain of Visa USA's litigation matters. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying value of the reserveaccrual was $153 million. This reserve$276 million and $121 million, respectively, and the amount is included inOther liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Other Guaranteesguarantees and Indemnificationsindemnifications
The Company, through its credit card business, provides various cardholder protection programs on several of its card products, including programs that provide insurance coverage for rental cars, coverage for certain losses associated with purchased products, price protection for certain purchases and protection for lost luggage. These guarantees are not included in the table, since the total outstanding amount of the guarantees and the Company's maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified. The protection is limited to certain types of purchases and certain types of losses and it is not possible to quantify the purchases that would qualify for these benefits at any given time. The Company assesses the probability and amount of its potential liability related to these programs based on the extent and nature of its historical loss experience. At June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the actual and estimated losses incurred and the carrying value of the Company's obligations related to these programs were immaterial.
In the normal course of business, the Company provides standard representations and warranties to counterparties in contracts in connection with numerous transactions and also provides indemnifications that protect the counterparties to the contracts in the event that additional taxes are owed due either to a change in the tax law or an adverse interpretation of the tax law. Counterparties to these transactions provide the Company with comparable indemnifications. While such representations, warranties and tax indemnifications are essential components of many contractual relationships, they do not represent the underlying business purpose for the transactions. The indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms related to the Company's own performance under the terms of a contract and are entered into in the normal course of business based on an assessment that the risk of loss is remote. Often these clauses are intended to ensure that terms of a contract are met at inception (for example, that loans transferred to a counterparty in a sales transaction did in fact meet the conditions specified in the contract at the transfer date). No compensation is received for these standard representations and warranties, and it is not possible to determine their fair value because they rarely, if ever, result in a payment. In many cases, there are no stated or notional amounts included in the indemnification clauses and the contingencies potentially triggering the obligation to indemnify have not occurred and are not expected to occur. There are no amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, related to theseThese indemnifications and they are not included in the table.table above.
In addition, the Company is a member of or shareholder in hundreds of value-transfer networks (VTNs) (payment clearing and settlement systems as well as securities exchanges) around the world. As a condition of membership, many of these VTNs require that members stand ready to backstop the net effect on the VTNs of a member's default on its obligations. The Company's potential obligations as a shareholder or member of VTN associations are excluded from the scope of FIN 45(ASC 460-10-15-7),45, since the shareholders and members represent subordinated classes of investors in the VTNs. Accordingly, the Company's participation in VTNs is not reported in the table and there are no amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 20092010 or December 31, 20082009 for potential obligations that could arise from the Company's involvement with VTN associations.
In the sale of an insurance subsidiary, the Company provided an indemnification to an insurance company for policyholder claims and other liabilities relating to a book of long-term care (LTC) business (for the entire term of the LTC policies) that is fully reinsured by another insurance company. The reinsurer has funded two trusts with securities whose fair value (approximately $3.8 billion and $3.3 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) is designed to cover the insurance company's statutory liabilities for the LTC policies. The assets in these trusts are evaluated and adjusted periodically to ensure that the fair value of the assets continues to cover the estimated statutory liabilities related to the LTC policies, as those statutory liabilities change over time. If the reinsurer fails to perform under the reinsurance agreement for any reason, including insolvency, and the assets in the two trusts are insufficient or unavailable to the ceding insurance company, then Citigroup must indemnify the ceding insurance company for any losses actually incurred in connection with the LTC policies. Since both events would have to occur before Citi would become responsible for any payment to the ceding insurance company pursuant to its indemnification obligation and the likelihood of such events occurring is currently not probable, there is no liability reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 related to this indemnification.
At June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the total carrying amounts of the liabilities related to the guarantees and indemnifications included in the table amounted to approximately $1.9$1.6 billion and $1.8$1.2 billion, respectively. The carrying value of derivative instruments is included in eitherTrading account liabilities orOther liabilities, depending upon whether the derivative was entered into for trading or non-trading purposes. The carrying value of financial and performance guarantees is included inOther liabilities. For loans sold with recourse, the carrying value of the liability is included inOther liabilities. In addition, at June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009,Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet include an allowance for credit losses of $1,082 million$1.054 billion and $887 million$1.122 billion relating to letters of credit and unfunded lending commitments, respectively.
Collateral
Cash collateral available to the Company to reimburse losses realized under these guarantees and indemnifications amounted to $33 billion and $31 billion at June 30, 2009 as well as2010 and December 31, 2008.2009, respectively. Securities and other marketable assets held as collateral amounted to $31$45 billion and $27$43 billion, at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, the majority of which collateral is held to reimburse losses realized under securities lending indemnifications. Additionally, letters of credit in favor of the Company held as collateral amounted to $700 million and $503 million$1.6 billion at June 30, 20092010 and $1.4 billion at December 31, 2008, respectively.2009. Other property may also be available to the Company to cover losses under certain guarantees and indemnifications; however, the value of such property has not been determined.
Performance Riskrisk
Citigroup evaluates the performance risk of its guarantees based on the assigned referenced counterparty internal or external ratings. Where external ratings are used, investment-grade ratings are considered to be Baa/BBB and above, while anything below is considered non-investment grade. The Citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external rating system. On certain underlying referenced credits or entities, ratings are not available. Such referenced credits are included in the "Not-rated"not rated category. The maximum potential amount of the future payments related to guarantees and credit derivatives sold is determined to be the notional amount of
these contracts, which is the par amount of the assets guaranteed.
Presented in the tables below isare the maximum potential amountamounts of future payments classified based upon internal and external credit ratings as of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008.2009. As previously mentioned, the determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. Such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.
| Maximum potential amount of future payments | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars as of June 30, 2009 | Investment grade | Non-investment grade | Not rated | Total | |||||||||
Financial standby letters of credit | $ | 45.9 | $ | 18.6 | $ | 38.3 | $ | 102.8 | |||||
Performance guarantees | 7.8 | 2.9 | 4.6 | 15.3 | |||||||||
Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees | — | — | 12.2 | 12.2 | |||||||||
Loans sold with recourse | — | — | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||||||||
Securities lending indemnifications | — | — | 55.3 | 55.3 | |||||||||
Credit card merchant processing | — | — | 54.2 | 54.2 | |||||||||
Custody indemnifications and other | 20.8 | 4.4 | — | 25.2 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 74.5 | $ | 25.9 | $ | 164.9 | $ | 265.3 | |||||
| Maximum potential amount of future payments | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars as of June 30, 2010 | Investment grade | Non-investment grade | Not rated | Total | |||||||||
Financial standby letters of credit | $ | 47.7 | $ | 14.3 | $ | 22.8 | $ | 84.8 | |||||
Performance guarantees | 6.4 | 3.6 | 2.9 | 12.9 | |||||||||
Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees | — | — | 7.3 | 7.3 | |||||||||
Loans sold with recourse | — | — | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||||||||
Securities lending indemnifications | — | — | 68.9 | 68.9 | |||||||||
Credit card merchant processing | — | — | 61.1 | 61.1 | |||||||||
Custody indemnifications and other | 29.2 | 6.0 | — | 35.2 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 83.3 | $ | 23.9 | $ | 163.3 | $ | 270.5 | |||||
| Maximum potential amount of future payments | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars as of December 31, 2008 | Investment grade | Non-investment grade | Not rated | Total | |||||||||
Financial standby letters of credit | $ | 49.2 | $ | 28.6 | $ | 16.4 | $ | 94.2 | |||||
Performance guarantees | 5.7 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 16.3 | |||||||||
Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees | — | — | 14.8 | 14.8 | |||||||||
Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows | — | — | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||||||||
Loans sold with recourse | — | — | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||||||||
Securities lending indemnifications | — | — | 47.6 | 47.6 | |||||||||
Credit card merchant processing | — | — | 56.7 | 56.7 | |||||||||
Custody indemnifications and other | 18.5 | 3.1 | — | 21.6 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 73.4 | $ | 36.7 | $ | 141.7 | $ | 251.8 | |||||
| Maximum potential amount of future payments | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In billions of dollars as of December 31, 2009 | Investment grade | Non-investment grade | Not rated | Total | |||||||||
Financial standby letters of credit | $ | 49.2 | $ | 13.5 | $ | 26.7 | $ | 89.4 | |||||
Performance guarantees | 6.5 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 13.9 | |||||||||
Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees | — | — | 7.7 | 7.7 | |||||||||
Loans sold with recourse | — | — | 0.3 | 0.3 | |||||||||
Securities lending indemnifications | — | — | 64.5 | 64.5 | |||||||||
Credit card merchant processing | — | — | 59.7 | 59.7 | |||||||||
Custody indemnifications and other | 27.7 | 5.8 | — | 33.5 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 83.4 | $ | 23.0 | $ | 162.6 | $ | 269.0 | |||||
TableCredit Commitments and Lines of Contents
Credit Commitments
The table below summarizes Citigroup's othercredit commitments as of June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008.2009:
In millions of dollars | U.S. | Outside of U.S. | June 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commercial and similar letters of credit | $ | 1,833 | $ | 5,975 | $ | 7,808 | $ | 8,215 | |||||
One- to four-family residential mortgages | 1,083 | 247 | 1,330 | 937 | |||||||||
Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties | 23,513 | 2,850 | 26,363 | 25,212 | |||||||||
Commercial real estate, construction and land development | 1,326 | 570 | 1,896 | 2,702 | |||||||||
Credit card lines | 738,176 | 134,867 | 873,043 | 1,002,437 | |||||||||
Commercial and other consumer loan commitments | 182,209 | 85,005 | 267,214 | 309,997 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 948,140 | $ | 229,514 | $ | 1,177,654 | $ | 1,349,500 | |||||
In millions of dollars | U.S. | Outside of U.S. | June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Commercial and similar letters of credit | $ | 1,484 | $ | 6,930 | $ | 8,414 | $ | 7,211 | |||||
One- to four-family residential mortgages | 1,026 | 315 | 1,341 | 1,070 | |||||||||
Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties | 19,240 | 2,717 | 21,957 | 23,916 | |||||||||
Commercial real estate, construction and land development | 1,872 | 316 | 2,188 | 1,704 | |||||||||
Credit card lines | 596,701 | 123,501 | 720,202 | 785,495 | |||||||||
Commercial and other consumer loan commitments | 118,533 | 79,290 | 197,823 | 257,342 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 738,856 | $ | 213,069 | $ | 951,925 | $ | 1,076,738 | |||||
The majority of unused commitments are contingent upon customers' maintaining specific credit standards. Commercial commitments generally have floating interest rates and fixed expiration dates and may require payment of fees. Such fees (net of certain direct costs) are deferred and, upon exercise of the commitment, amortized over the life of the loan or, if exercise is deemed remote, amortized over the commitment period.
Commercial and similar letters of credit
A commercial letter of credit is an instrument by which Citigroup substitutes its credit for that of a customer to enable the customerscustomer to finance the purchase of goods or to incur other commitments. Citigroup issues a letter on behalf of its client to a supplier and agrees to pay themthe supplier upon presentation of documentary evidence that the supplier has performed in accordance with the terms of the letter of credit. When a letter of credit is drawn, the customer is then is required to reimburse Citigroup.
One- to four-family residential mortgages
A one- to four-family residential mortgage commitment is a written confirmation from Citigroup to a seller of a property that the bank will advance the specified sums enabling the buyer to complete the purchase.
Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties
Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties are essentially home equity lines of credit. A home equity line of credit is a loan secured by a primary residence or second home to the extent of the excess of fair market value over the debt outstanding for the first mortgage.
Commercial Real Estate, Constructionreal estate, construction and Land Developmentland development
Commercial real estate, construction and land development include unused portions of commitments to extend credit for the purpose of financing commercial and multifamily residential properties as well as land development projects. Both secured-by-real estatesecured-by-real-estate and unsecured commitments are included in this line. In addition,line, as well as undistributed loan proceeds, where there is an obligation to advance for construction progress are also included in this line.payments. However, this line only includes those extensions of credit that, once funded, will be classified as LoansTotal loans, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Credit card lines
Citigroup provides credit to customers by issuing credit cards. The credit card lines are unconditionally cancellable by the issuer.
Commercial and other consumer loan commitments
Commercial and other consumer loan commitments include overdraft and liquidity facilities, as well as commercial commitments to make or purchase loans, to purchase third-party receivables, and to provide note issuance or revolving underwriting facilities.facilities and to invest in the form of equity. Amounts include $122$79 billion and $140$126 billion with an original maturity of less than one year at June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively.
In addition, included in this line item are highly leveraged financing commitments, which are agreements that provide funding to a borrower with higher levels of debt (measured by the ratio of debt capital to equity capital of the borrower) than is generally considered normal for other companies. This type of financing is commonly employed in corporate acquisitions, management buy-outs and similar transactions.
21.20. CONTINGENCIES
The CompanyIn accordance with ASC 450 (formerly SFAS 5), Citigroup establishes accruals for litigation and regulatory matters when it is probable that a defendantloss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, accruals are adjusted from time to time, as appropriate, in numerous lawsuits and other legal proceedings arising outlight of alleged misconduct in connection with certain matters.additional information. In view of the large numberinherent unpredictability of such matters, the uncertainties of the timing and outcome of this type of litigation, the novel issues presented, and the significant amounts involved, it is possible that the ultimate costs of these matters may exceed or be below the Company's litigation reserves. The Company will continue to defend itself vigorously in these cases, and seek to resolve them in the manner management believes is in the best interests of the Company.
In addition, in the ordinary course of business, Citigroup and its subsidiaries are defendants or co-defendants or parties in various litigation and regulatory matters, incidental to and typicalparticularly where the damages sought are substantial or indeterminate, the investigations or proceedings are in the early stages, or the matters involve novel legal theories or a large number of parties, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, in excess of the businesses in which they are engaged. Inamounts accrued for these matters or predict the timing of their eventual resolution, and the actual costs of resolving litigation and regulatory matters may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those matters.
Subject to the foregoing, it is the opinion of Citigroup's management, based on current knowledge and after taking into account available insurance coverage and its current accruals, that the Company's management, the ultimate resolutioneventual outcome of these legal and regulatory proceedingsmatters would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of Citi. Nonetheless, given the Company but, if involving monetary liability, may beinherent unpredictability of litigation and the substantial or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters, an adverse outcome in certain of these matters could, from time to time, have a material to the Company's operatingadverse effect on Citi's consolidated results for anyof operations or cash flows in particular period.quarterly or annual periods.
22.
21. CITIBANK, N.A. STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
Statement of Changes in Stockholder's Equity (Unaudited)
| Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars, except shares | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||
Common stock ($20 par value) | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period—Shares: 37,534,553 in 2009 and 2008 | $ | 751 | $ | 751 | ||||
Balance, end of period—Shares: 37,534,553 in 2009 and 2008 | $ | 751 | $ | 751 | ||||
Surplus | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 74,767 | $ | 69,135 | ||||
Capital contribution from parent company | 27,481 | 55 | ||||||
Employee benefit plans | 15 | 100 | ||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 102,263 | $ | 69,290 | ||||
Retained earnings | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 21,735 | $ | 31,915 | ||||
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1) | 402 | — | ||||||
Adjusted balance, beginning of period | $ | 22,137 | $ | 31,915 | ||||
Net income (loss) | (1,477 | ) | (1,803 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid | 3 | (27 | ) | |||||
Other(2) | 117 | — | ||||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 20,780 | $ | 30,085 | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | (15,895 | ) | $ | (2,495 | ) | ||
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1) | (402 | ) | — | |||||
Adjusted balance, beginning of period | $ | (16,297 | ) | $ | (2,495 | ) | ||
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net of taxes | 1,731 | (2,234 | ) | |||||
Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of taxes | (164 | ) | 527 | |||||
Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes | 737 | (402 | ) | |||||
Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes | 29 | 65 | ||||||
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 2,333 | $ | (2,044 | ) | |||
Balance, end of period | $ | (13,964 | ) | $ | (4,539 | ) | ||
Total Citibank common stockholder's equity and total Citibank stockholder's equity | $ | 109,830 | $ | 95,587 | ||||
Noncontrolling interest | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 1,082 | $ | 1,266 | ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest shareholders | 23 | 56 | ||||||
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest shareholders | (16 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investments securities, net of tax | 1 | (12 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax | (40 | ) | 126 | |||||
All other | (153 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||
Net change in noncontrolling interest | $ | (185 | ) | $ | 149 | |||
Balance, end of period | $ | 897 | $ | 1,415 | ||||
Total equity | $ | 110,727 | $ | 97,002 | ||||
Comprehensive income (loss) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interest | $ | (1,454 | ) | $ | (1,747 | ) | ||
Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 2,294 | (1,930 | ) | |||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 840 | $ | (3,677 | ) | |||
Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest | (16 | ) | 170 | |||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Citibank | $ | 856 | $ | (3,847 | ) | |||
| Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||
In millions of dollars, except shares | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Common stock ($20 par value) | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period—shares: 37,534,553 in 2010 and 2009 | $ | 751 | $ | 751 | |||
Balance, end of period | $ | 751 | $ | 751 | |||
Surplus | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 107,923 | $ | 74,767 | |||
Capital contribution from parent company | 810 | 27,481 | |||||
Employee benefit plans | 366 | 15 | |||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 109,099 | $ | 102,263 | |||
Retained earnings | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 19,457 | $ | 21,735 | |||
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)(2) | (411 | ) | 402 | ||||
Adjusted balance, beginning of period | $ | 19,046 | $ | 22,137 | |||
Net income | 4,920 | (1,477 | ) | ||||
Dividends(3) | 9 | 3 | |||||
Other(4) | — | 117 | |||||
Balance, end of period | $ | 23,975 | $ | 20,780 | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | (11,532 | ) | $ | (15,895 | ) | |
Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1) | — | (402 | ) | ||||
Adjusted balance, beginning of period | $ | (11,532 | ) | $ | (16,297 | ) | |
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net of taxes | 1,787 | 1,731 | |||||
Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes | (2,708 | ) | (164 | ) | |||
Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes | 226 | 737 | |||||
Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes | — | 29 | |||||
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (695 | ) | $ | 2,333 | ||
Balance, end of period | $ | (12,227 | ) | $ | (13,964 | ) | |
Total Citibank stockholder's equity | $ | 121,598 | $ | 109,830 | |||
Noncontrolling interest | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 1,294 | $ | 1,082 | |||
Initial origination of a noncontrolling interest | (75 | ) | — | ||||
Transactions between noncontrolling interest and the related consolidating subsidiary | (1 | ) | — | ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest shareholders | 48 | 23 | |||||
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest shareholders | (1 | ) | (16 | ) | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of tax | 6 | 1 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax | (105 | ) | (40 | ) | |||
All other | (42 | ) | (153 | ) | |||
Net change in noncontrolling interest | $ | (170 | ) | $ | (185 | ) | |
Balance, end of period | $ | 1,124 | $ | 897 | |||
Total equity | $ | 122,722 | $ | 110,727 | |||
Comprehensive income (loss) | |||||||
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interest | $ | 4,968 | $ | (1,454 | ) | ||
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | (794 | ) | 2,294 | ||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 4,174 | $ | 840 | |||
Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest | (51 | ) | (16 | ) | |||
Comprehensive income attributable to Citibank | $ | 4,225 | $ | 856 | |||
Public and Private Exchange Offers
On July 23, 2009 and July 29, 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with the private and public holders of preferred stock and trust preferred securities, as applicable ($32.8 billion in aggregate liquidation value). In connection with these exchanges, the U.S. Treasury also exchanged $25 billion of aggregate liquidation value of its preferred stock, for a total exchange of $57.8 billion.
Sale of Nikko Asset Management
On July 30, 2009, Citigroup entered into a definitive agreement to sell its entire ownership interest in Nikko Asset Management to The Sumitomo Trust and Banking Co., Ltd. for an all cash consideration of approximately $795 million (¥75.6 billion). The sale is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2009, subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions, and is not expected to have a material impact on Citi's net income.
As required by SFAS 165,Subsequent Events, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through August 7, 2009,6, 2010, which is the date its Consolidated Financial Statements were issued.
24.
23. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTSTATEMENTS SCHEDULES
These unaudited condensed consolidating financial statementConsolidating Financial Statements schedules are presented for purposes of additional analysis but should be considered in relation to the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup taken as a whole.
Citigroup Parent Company
The holding company, Citigroup Inc.
Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI)
Citigroup guarantees various debt obligations of CGMHI as well as all of the outstanding debt obligations under CGMHI's publicly issued debt.
Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI)
CFI is a first-tier subsidiary of Citigroup, which issues commercial paper, medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and credit-linked notes, all of which are guaranteed by Citigroup.
CitiFinancial Credit Company (CCC)
An indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. CCC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Associates First Capital Corporation (described below).Associates. Citigroup has issued a full and unconditional guarantee of the outstanding indebtedness of CCC.
Associates First Capital Corporation (Associates)
A wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. Citigroup has issued a full and unconditional guarantee of the outstanding long-term debt securities and commercial paper of Associates. In addition, Citigroup guaranteed various debt obligations of Citigroup Finance Canada Inc. (CFCI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Associates. CFCI continues to issue debt in the Canadian market supported by a Citigroup guarantee. Associates is the immediate parent company of CCC (described above).CCC.
Other Citigroup Subsidiaries
Includes all other subsidiaries of Citigroup, intercompany eliminations, and income/loss from discontinued operations.
Consolidating Adjustments
Includes Citigroup parent company elimination of distributed and undistributed income of subsidiaries, investment in subsidiaries and the elimination of CCC, which is included in the Associates column.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOMECondensed Consolidating Statements of Income
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries, eliminations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Revenues | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies | $ | 16 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (16 | ) | $ | — | ||||||||
Interest revenue | $ | 57 | $ | 1,930 | $ | 1 | $ | 1,573 | $ | 1,795 | $ | 15,888 | $ | (1,573 | ) | $ | 19,671 | ||||||||
Interest revenue—intercompany | 554 | 1,461 | 1,030 | (1,653 | ) | 113 | (3,158 | ) | 1,653 | — | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 1,988 | 725 | 449 | 21 | 117 | 3,563 | (21 | ) | 6,842 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense—intercompany | (294 | ) | 701 | 260 | (1,111 | ) | 395 | (1,062 | ) | 1,111 | — | ||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | (1,083 | ) | $ | 1,965 | $ | 322 | $ | 1,010 | $ | 1,396 | $ | 10,229 | $ | (1,010 | ) | $ | 12,829 | |||||||
Commissions and fees | $ | — | $ | 1,829 | $ | — | $ | 11 | $ | 29 | $ | 3,579 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 5,437 | ||||||||
Commissions and fees—intercompany | — | 26 | — | 16 | 23 | (49 | ) | (16 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Principal transactions | 474 | 575 | (1,245 | ) | — | 2 | 627 | — | 433 | ||||||||||||||||
Principal transactions—intercompany | (364 | ) | 772 | 614 | — | (76 | ) | (946 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Other income | 1,150 | 11,918 | 115 | 107 | 199 | (2,112 | ) | (107 | ) | 11,270 | |||||||||||||||
Other income—intercompany | (2,022 | ) | (53 | ) | (91 | ) | 2 | 8 | 2,158 | (2 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Total non-interest revenues | $ | (762 | ) | $ | 15,067 | $ | (607 | ) | $ | 136 | $ | 185 | $ | 3,257 | $ | (136 | ) | $ | 17,140 | ||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | (1,829 | ) | $ | 17,032 | $ | (285 | ) | $ | 1,146 | $ | 1,581 | $ | 13,486 | $ | (1,162 | ) | $ | 29,969 | ||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | — | $ | 14 | $ | — | $ | 982 | $ | 1,118 | $ | 11,544 | $ | (982 | ) | $ | 12,676 | ||||||||
Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | $ | 5 | $ | 1,816 | $ | — | $ | 139 | $ | 187 | $ | 4,351 | $ | (139 | ) | $ | 6,359 | ||||||||
Compensation and benefits—intercompany | 1 | 142 | — | 71 | 34 | (177 | ) | (71 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Other expense | 180 | 669 | — | 80 | 115 | 4,676 | (80 | ) | 5,640 | ||||||||||||||||
Other expense—intercompany | (12 | ) | 334 | 2 | 107 | 152 | (476 | ) | (107 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 174 | $ | 2,961 | $ | 2 | $ | 397 | $ | 488 | $ | 8,374 | $ | (397 | ) | $ | 11,999 | ||||||||
Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries | $ | (2,003 | ) | $ | 14,057 | $ | (287 | ) | $ | (233 | ) | $ | (25 | ) | $ | (6,432 | ) | $ | 217 | $ | 5,294 | ||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (1,696 | ) | 5,472 | (117 | ) | (89 | ) | (17 | ) | (2,735 | ) | 89 | 907 | ||||||||||||
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries | 4,586 | — | — | — | — | — | (4,586 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from continuing operations | $ | 4,279 | $ | 8,585 | $ | (170 | ) | $ | (144 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (3,697 | ) | $ | (4,458 | ) | $ | 4,387 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes | — | — | — | — | — | (142 | ) | — | (142 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests | $ | 4,279 | $ | 8,585 | $ | (170 | ) | $ | (144 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (3,839 | ) | $ | (4,458 | ) | $ | 4,245 | ||||
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests | — | (50 | ) | — | — | — | 16 | — | (34 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Citigroup's Net Income (Loss) | $ | 4,279 | $ | 8,635 | $ | (170 | ) | $ | (144 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (3,855 | ) | $ | (4,458 | ) | $ | 4,279 | ||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries, eliminations and income from discontinued operations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Revenues | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies | $ | 8,827 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (8,827 | ) | $ | — | ||||||||
Interest revenue | 68 | $ | 1,561 | $ | — | $ | 1,329 | $ | 1,523 | $ | 17,266 | $ | (1,329 | ) | $ | 20,418 | |||||||||
Interest revenue—intercompany | 539 | 431 | 813 | 20 | 95 | (1,878 | ) | (20 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 2,163 | 575 | 467 | 23 | 53 | 3,121 | (23 | ) | 6,379 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense—intercompany | (206 | ) | 410 | 74 | 508 | 332 | (610 | ) | (508 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | (1,350 | ) | $ | 1,007 | $ | 272 | $ | 818 | $ | 1,233 | $ | 12,877 | $ | (818 | ) | $ | 14,039 | |||||||
Commissions and fees | $ | — | $ | 925 | $ | — | $ | 12 | $ | 42 | $ | 2,262 | $ | (12 | ) | $ | 3,229 | ||||||||
Commissions and fees—intercompany | — | 23 | — | 37 | 42 | (65 | ) | (37 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Principal transactions | 48 | 2,226 | 212 | — | (4 | ) | (265 | ) | — | 2,217 | |||||||||||||||
Principal transactions—intercompany | 1 | (1,277 | ) | 116 | — | (105 | ) | 1,265 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Other income | (1,357 | ) | 49 | 200 | 111 | 232 | 3,462 | (111 | ) | 2,586 | |||||||||||||||
Other income—intercompany | 1,330 | (25 | ) | (218 | ) | (1 | ) | 7 | (1,094 | ) | 1 | — | |||||||||||||
Total non-interest revenues | $ | 22 | $ | 1,921 | $ | 310 | $ | 159 | $ | 214 | $ | 5,565 | $ | (159 | ) | $ | 8,032 | ||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 7,499 | $ | 2,928 | $ | 582 | $ | 977 | $ | 1,447 | $ | 18,442 | $ | (9,804 | ) | $ | 22,071 | ||||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | — | $ | 23 | $ | — | $ | 618 | $ | 702 | $ | 5,940 | $ | (618 | ) | $ | 6,665 | ||||||||
Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 1,367 | $ | — | $ | 158 | $ | 209 | $ | 4,387 | $ | (158 | ) | $ | 5,961 | |||||||
Compensation and benefits—intercompany | 1 | 52 | — | 33 | 33 | (86 | ) | (33 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Other expense | 65 | 1,023 | — | 123 | 167 | 4,650 | (123 | ) | 5,905 | ||||||||||||||||
Other expense—intercompany | 91 | (49 | ) | 2 | 141 | 153 | (197 | ) | (141 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 155 | $ | 2,393 | $ | 2 | $ | 455 | $ | 562 | $ | 8,754 | $ | (455 | ) | $ | 11,866 | ||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries | $ | 7,344 | $ | 512 | $ | 580 | $ | (96 | ) | $ | 183 | $ | 3,748 | $ | (8,731 | ) | $ | 3,540 | |||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (406 | ) | 165 | 199 | (30 | ) | 47 | 807 | 30 | 812 | |||||||||||||||
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries | (5,053 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | 5,053 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 2,697 | $ | 347 | $ | 381 | $ | (66 | ) | $ | 136 | $ | 2,941 | $ | (3,708 | ) | $ | 2,728 | |||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | — | — | — | — | — | (3 | ) | — | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before attrition of noncontrolling interest | $ | 2,697 | $ | 347 | $ | 381 | $ | (66 | ) | $ | 136 | $ | 2,938 | $ | (3,708 | ) | $ | 2,725 | |||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | 2 | — | — | — | 26 | — | 28 | |||||||||||||||||
Citigroup's net income (loss) | $ | 2,697 | $ | 345 | $ | 381 | $ | (66 | ) | $ | 136 | $ | 2,912 | $ | (3,708 | ) | $ | 2,697 | |||||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOMECondensed Consolidating Statements of Income
| Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries, eliminations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Revenues | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies | $ | 35 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (35 | ) | $ | — | ||||||||
Interest revenue | $ | 177 | $ | 4,199 | $ | 1 | $ | 3,206 | $ | 3,659 | $ | 32,218 | $ | (3,206 | ) | $ | 40,254 | ||||||||
Interest revenue—intercompany | 1,356 | 2,169 | 2,090 | (1,643 | ) | 229 | (5,844 | ) | 1,643 | — | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 4,212 | 1,416 | 965 | 46 | 219 | 7,687 | (46 | ) | 14,499 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense—intercompany | (530 | ) | 1,800 | 439 | (535 | ) | 865 | (2,574 | ) | 535 | — | ||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | (2,149 | ) | $ | 3,152 | $ | 687 | $ | 2,052 | $ | 2,804 | $ | 21,261 | $ | (2,052 | ) | $ | 25,755 | |||||||
Commissions and fees | $ | — | $ | 3,482 | $ | — | $ | 22 | $ | 59 | $ | 6,064 | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 9,605 | ||||||||
Commissions and fees—intercompany | — | 59 | — | 35 | 44 | (103 | ) | (35 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Principal transactions | 117 | (1,129 | ) | (259 | ) | — | — | 5,374 | — | 4,103 | |||||||||||||||
Principal transactions—intercompany | (221 | ) | 3,910 | (59 | ) | — | (86 | ) | (3,544 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
Other income | 4,672 | 12,620 | 75 | 209 | 347 | (2,687 | ) | (209 | ) | 15,027 | |||||||||||||||
Other income—intercompany | (4,391 | ) | (35 | ) | (61 | ) | 2 | 32 | 4,455 | (2 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Total non-interest revenues | $ | 177 | $ | 18,907 | $ | (304 | ) | $ | 268 | $ | 396 | $ | 9,559 | $ | (268 | ) | $ | 28,735 | |||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | (1,937 | ) | $ | 22,059 | $ | 383 | $ | 2,320 | $ | 3,200 | $ | 30,820 | $ | (2,355 | ) | $ | 54,490 | |||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | — | $ | 38 | $ | — | $ | 1,938 | $ | 2,169 | $ | 20,776 | $ | (1,938 | ) | $ | 22,983 | ||||||||
Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | $ | (45 | ) | $ | 3,673 | $ | — | $ | 259 | $ | 335 | $ | 8,631 | $ | (259 | ) | $ | 12,594 | |||||||
Compensation and benefits—intercompany | 3 | 335 | — | 71 | 71 | (409 | ) | (71 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Other expense | 408 | 1,328 | 1 | 189 | 262 | 9,091 | (189 | ) | 11,090 | ||||||||||||||||
Other expense—intercompany | 97 | 340 | 5 | 273 | 305 | (747 | ) | (273 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 463 | $ | 5,676 | $ | 6 | $ | 792 | $ | 973 | $ | 16,566 | $ | (792 | ) | $ | 23,684 | ||||||||
Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries | $ | (2,400 | ) | $ | 16,345 | $ | 377 | $ | (410 | ) | $ | 58 | $ | (6,522 | ) | $ | 375 | $ | 7,823 | ||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (1,045 | ) | 6,164 | 115 | (148 | ) | 15 | (3,507 | ) | 148 | 1,742 | ||||||||||||||
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries | 7,227 | — | — | — | — | — | (7,227 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from continuing operations | $ | 5,872 | $ | 10,181 | $ | 262 | $ | (262 | ) | $ | 43 | $ | (3,015 | ) | $ | (7,000 | ) | $ | 6,081 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes | — | — | — | — | — | (259 | ) | — | (259 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests | $ | 5,872 | $ | 10,181 | $ | 262 | $ | (262 | ) | $ | 43 | $ | (3,274 | ) | $ | (7,000 | ) | $ | 5,822 | ||||||
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests | — | (51 | ) | — | — | — | 1 | — | (50 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Citigroup's Net Income (Loss) | $ | 5,872 | $ | 10,232 | $ | 262 | $ | (262 | ) | $ | 43 | $ | (3,275 | ) | $ | (7,000 | ) | $ | 5,872 | ||||||
| Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries, eliminations and income from discontinued operations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Revenues | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies | $ | 11,604 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (11,604 | ) | $ | — | ||||||||
Interest revenue | $ | 143 | $ | 3,051 | $ | — | $ | 2,728 | $ | 3,129 | $ | 34,947 | $ | (2,728 | ) | $ | 41,270 | ||||||||
Interest revenue—intercompany | 1,047 | 996 | 1,637 | 40 | 191 | (3,871 | ) | (40 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 4,351 | 1,097 | 1,266 | 47 | 147 | 5,809 | (47 | ) | 12,670 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense—intercompany | (405 | ) | 1,076 | (208 | ) | 1,025 | 640 | (1,103 | ) | (1,025 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | (2,756 | ) | $ | 1,874 | $ | 579 | $ | 1,696 | $ | 2,533 | $ | 26,370 | $ | (1,696 | ) | $ | 28,600 | |||||||
Commissions and fees | $ | — | $ | 2,212 | $ | — | $ | 23 | $ | 75 | $ | 4,587 | $ | (23 | ) | $ | 6,874 | ||||||||
Commissions and fees—intercompany | — | 81 | — | 77 | 86 | (167 | ) | (77 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Principal transactions | (69 | ) | 6,047 | 501 | — | (6 | ) | (103 | ) | — | 6,370 | ||||||||||||||
Principal transactions—intercompany | (3 | ) | $ | (2,945 | ) | (157 | ) | — | (123 | ) | 3,228 | — | — | ||||||||||||
Other income | (338 | ) | 401 | — | 214 | 373 | 5,212 | (214 | ) | 5,648 | |||||||||||||||
Other income—intercompany | 505 | 5 | — | — | 16 | (526 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Total non-interest revenues | $ | 95 | $ | 5,801 | $ | 344 | $ | 314 | $ | 421 | $ | 12,231 | $ | (314 | ) | $ | 18,892 | ||||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | 8,943 | $ | 7,675 | $ | 923 | $ | 2,010 | $ | 2,954 | $ | 38,601 | $ | (13,614 | ) | $ | 47,492 | ||||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | — | $ | 27 | $ | — | $ | 1,303 | $ | 1,452 | $ | 13,804 | $ | (1,303 | ) | $ | 15,283 | ||||||||
Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | $ | 100 | $ | 2,863 | $ | — | $ | 284 | $ | 389 | $ | 8,771 | $ | (284 | ) | $ | 12,123 | ||||||||
Compensation and benefits—intercompany | 3 | 106 | — | 67 | 67 | (176 | ) | (67 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Other expense | 205 | 1,517 | — | 235 | 319 | 9,220 | (235 | ) | 11,261 | ||||||||||||||||
Other expense—intercompany | 155 | 192 | 4 | 320 | 340 | (691 | ) | (320 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 463 | $ | 4,678 | $ | 4 | $ | 906 | $ | 1,115 | $ | 17,124 | $ | (906 | ) | $ | 23,384 | ||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries | $ | 8,480 | $ | 2,970 | $ | 919 | $ | (199 | ) | $ | 387 | $ | 7,673 | $ | (11,405 | ) | $ | 8,825 | |||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (1,476 | ) | 985 | 318 | (72 | ) | 114 | 1,907 | 72 | 1,848 | |||||||||||||||
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries | (2,831 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | 2,831 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 7,125 | $ | 1,985 | $ | 601 | $ | (127 | ) | $ | 273 | $ | 5,766 | $ | (8,646 | ) | $ | 6,977 | |||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes | — | — | — | — | — | 208 | — | 208 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before attrition of noncontrolling interest | $ | 7,125 | $ | 1,985 | $ | 601 | $ | (127 | ) | $ | 273 | $ | 5,974 | $ | (8,646 | ) | $ | 7,185 | |||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | 16 | — | — | — | 44 | — | 60 | |||||||||||||||||
Citigroup's net income (loss) | $ | 7,125 | $ | 1,969 | $ | 601 | $ | (127 | ) | $ | 273 | $ | 5,930 | $ | (8,646 | ) | $ | 7,125 | |||||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOMECondensed Consolidating Statements of Income
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries, eliminations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Revenues | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies | $ | 82 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (82 | ) | $ | — | ||||||||
Interest revenue | $ | 184 | $ | 4,960 | $ | 1 | $ | 1,816 | $ | 2,102 | $ | 20,090 | $ | (1,816 | ) | $ | 27,337 | ||||||||
Interest revenue—intercompany | 1,104 | 554 | 1,230 | 25 | 143 | (3,031 | ) | (25 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 2,308 | 3,273 | 849 | 34 | 162 | 6,759 | (34 | ) | 13,351 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense—intercompany | (114 | ) | 1,020 | 79 | 608 | 468 | (1,453 | ) | (608 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | (906 | ) | $ | 1,221 | $ | 303 | $ | 1,199 | $ | 1,615 | $ | 11,753 | $ | (1,199 | ) | $ | 13,986 | |||||||
Commissions and fees | $ | — | $ | 2,307 | $ | 1 | $ | 21 | $ | 45 | $ | 3,446 | $ | (21 | ) | $ | 5,799 | ||||||||
Commissions and fees—intercompany | (336 | ) | 360 | — | 8 | 10 | (34 | ) | (8 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Principal transactions | (456 | ) | (9,514 | ) | 469 | — | 4 | 3,695 | — | (5,802 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Principal transactions—intercompany | 64 | 5,404 | (523 | ) | — | (33 | ) | (4,912 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Other income | 1,867 | 1,050 | 151 | 112 | 157 | 330 | (112 | ) | 3,555 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income—intercompany | (1,545 | ) | 44 | (134 | ) | 6 | 49 | 1,586 | (6 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Total non-interest revenues | $ | (406 | ) | $ | (349 | ) | $ | (36 | ) | $ | 147 | $ | 232 | $ | 4,111 | $ | (147 | ) | $ | 3,552 | |||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | (1,230 | ) | $ | 872 | $ | 267 | $ | 1,346 | $ | 1,847 | $ | 15,864 | $ | (1,428 | ) | $ | 17,538 | |||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | — | $ | 284 | $ | — | $ | 769 | $ | 861 | $ | 5,955 | $ | (769 | ) | $ | 7,100 | ||||||||
Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | $ | (42 | ) | $ | 2,680 | $ | — | $ | 173 | $ | 241 | $ | 5,813 | $ | (173 | ) | $ | 8,692 | |||||||
Compensation and benefits—intercompany | 2 | 231 | — | 50 | 50 | (283 | ) | (50 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Other expense | 67 | 964 | 1 | 132 | 175 | 5,315 | (132 | ) | 6,522 | ||||||||||||||||
Other expense—intercompany | 112 | 502 | 31 | 81 | 101 | (746 | ) | (81 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 139 | $ | 4,377 | $ | 32 | $ | 436 | $ | 567 | $ | 10,099 | $ | (436 | ) | $ | 15,214 | ||||||||
Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries | $ | (1,369 | ) | $ | (3,789 | ) | $ | 235 | $ | 141 | $ | 419 | $ | (190 | ) | $ | (223 | ) | $ | (4,776 | ) | ||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (338 | ) | (1,636 | ) | 80 | 56 | 147 | (700 | ) | (56 | ) | (2,447 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries | (1,464 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | 1,464 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from continuing operations | $ | (2,495 | ) | $ | (2,153 | ) | $ | 155 | $ | 85 | $ | 272 | $ | 510 | $ | 1,297 | $ | (2,329 | ) | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes | — | — | — | — | — | (94 | ) | — | (94 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests | $ | (2,495 | ) | $ | (2,153 | ) | $ | 155 | $ | 85 | $ | 272 | $ | 416 | $ | 1,297 | $ | (2,423 | ) | ||||||
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests | — | — | — | — | — | 72 | — | 72 | |||||||||||||||||
Citigroup's Net Income (Loss) | $ | (2,495 | ) | $ | (2,153 | ) | $ | 155 | $ | 85 | $ | 272 | $ | 344 | $ | 1,297 | $ | (2,495 | ) | ||||||
| Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries, eliminations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Revenues | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies | $ | 16 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (16 | ) | $ | — | ||||||||
Interest revenue | $ | 57 | $ | 1,930 | $ | 1 | $ | 1,573 | $ | 1,795 | $ | 15,888 | $ | (1,573 | ) | $ | 19,671 | ||||||||
Interest revenue—intercompany | 554 | 1,461 | 1,030 | (1,653 | ) | 113 | (3,158 | ) | 1,653 | — | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 1,988 | 725 | 449 | 21 | 117 | 3,563 | (21 | ) | 6,842 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense—intercompany | (294 | ) | 701 | 260 | (1,111 | ) | 395 | (1,062 | ) | 1,111 | — | ||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | (1,083 | ) | $ | 1,965 | $ | 322 | $ | 1,010 | $ | 1,396 | $ | 10,229 | $ | (1,010 | ) | $ | 12,829 | |||||||
Commissions and fees | $ | — | $ | 1,829 | $ | — | $ | 11 | $ | 29 | $ | 2,226 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 4,084 | ||||||||
Commissions and fees—intercompany | — | 26 | — | 16 | 23 | (49 | ) | (16 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Principal transactions | 474 | 575 | (1,245 | ) | — | 2 | 1,982 | — | 1,788 | ||||||||||||||||
Principal transactions—intercompany | (364 | ) | 772 | 614 | — | (76 | ) | (946 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Other income | 1,150 | 11,918 | 115 | 107 | 199 | (2,114 | ) | (107 | ) | 11,268 | |||||||||||||||
Other income—intercompany | (2,022 | ) | (53 | ) | (91 | ) | 2 | 8 | 2,158 | (2 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Total non-interest revenues | $ | (762 | ) | $ | 15,067 | $ | (607 | ) | $ | 136 | $ | 185 | $ | 3,257 | $ | (136 | ) | $ | 17,140 | ||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | (1,829 | ) | $ | 17,032 | $ | (285 | ) | $ | 1,146 | $ | 1,581 | $ | 13,486 | $ | (1,162 | ) | $ | 29,969 | ||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | — | $ | 14 | $ | — | $ | 982 | $ | 1,118 | $ | 11,544 | $ | (982 | ) | $ | 12,676 | ||||||||
Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | $ | 5 | $ | 1,816 | $ | — | $ | 139 | $ | 187 | $ | 4,351 | $ | (139 | ) | $ | 6,359 | ||||||||
Compensation and benefits— intercompany | 1 | 142 | — | 71 | 34 | (177 | ) | (71 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Other expense | 180 | 669 | — | 80 | 115 | 4,676 | (80 | ) | 5,640 | ||||||||||||||||
Other expense—intercompany | (12 | ) | 334 | 2 | 107 | 152 | (476 | ) | (107 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 174 | $ | 2,961 | $ | 2 | $ | 397 | $ | 488 | $ | 8,374 | $ | (397 | ) | $ | 11,999 | ||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries | $ | (2,003 | ) | $ | 14,057 | $ | (287 | ) | $ | (233 | ) | $ | (25 | ) | $ | (6,432 | ) | $ | 217 | $ | 5,294 | ||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (1,696 | ) | 5,472 | (117 | ) | (89 | ) | (17 | ) | (2,735 | ) | 89 | 907 | ||||||||||||
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries | 4,586 | — | — | — | — | — | (4,586 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 4,279 | $ | 8,585 | $ | (170 | ) | $ | (144 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (3,697 | ) | $ | (4,458 | ) | $ | 4,387 | ||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes | — | — | — | — | — | (142 | ) | — | (142 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests | $ | 4,279 | $ | 8,585 | $ | (170 | ) | $ | (144 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (3,839 | ) | $ | (4,458 | ) | $ | 4,245 | ||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | (50 | ) | — | — | — | 16 | — | (34 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Citigroup's net income (loss) | $ | 4,279 | $ | 8,635 | $ | (170 | ) | $ | (144 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (3,855 | ) | $ | (4,458 | ) | $ | 4,279 | ||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOMECondensed Consolidating Statements of Income
| Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries, eliminations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Revenues | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies | $ | 1,448 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (1,448 | ) | $ | — | ||||||||
Interest revenue | $ | 318 | $ | 10,784 | $ | 1 | $ | 3,628 | $ | 4,194 | $ | 41,201 | $ | (3,628 | ) | $ | 56,498 | ||||||||
Interest revenue—intercompany | 2,410 | 999 | 2,642 | 36 | 294 | (6,345 | ) | (36 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 4,599 | 7,336 | 1,810 | 75 | 337 | 15,342 | (75 | ) | 29,424 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense—intercompany | (141 | ) | 2,426 | 187 | 1,232 | 1,161 | (3,633 | ) | (1,232 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | (1,730 | ) | $ | 2,021 | $ | 646 | $ | 2,357 | $ | 2,990 | $ | 23,147 | $ | (2,357 | ) | $ | 27,074 | |||||||
Commissions and fees | $ | — | $ | 4,540 | $ | 1 | $ | 41 | $ | 92 | $ | 2,507 | $ | (41 | ) | $ | 7,140 | ||||||||
Commissions and fees—intercompany | (346 | ) | 432 | — | 15 | 21 | (107 | ) | (15 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Principal transactions | 502 | (17,082 | ) | 1,285 | — | — | 2,861 | — | (12,434 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Principal transactions—intercompany | (220 | ) | 5,580 | (1,105 | ) | — | (10 | ) | (4,245 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
Other income | 111 | 2,014 | 85 | 221 | 291 | 5,414 | (221 | ) | 7,915 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income—intercompany | (239 | ) | 584 | (64 | ) | 13 | 75 | (356 | ) | (13 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Total non-interest revenues | $ | (192 | ) | $ | (3,932 | ) | $ | 202 | $ | 290 | $ | 469 | $ | 6,074 | $ | (290 | ) | $ | 2,621 | ||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | (474 | ) | $ | (1,911 | ) | $ | 848 | $ | 2,647 | $ | 3,459 | $ | 29,221 | $ | (4,095 | ) | $ | 29,695 | ||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | — | $ | 300 | $ | — | $ | 1,758 | $ | 1,947 | $ | 10,705 | $ | (1,758 | ) | $ | 12,952 | ||||||||
Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | $ | (49 | ) | $ | 5,484 | $ | — | $ | 371 | $ | 515 | $ | 11,304 | $ | (371 | ) | $ | 17,254 | |||||||
Compensation and benefits—intercompany | 4 | 467 | — | 99 | 100 | (571 | ) | (99 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Other expense | 116 | 1,923 | 1 | 257 | 342 | 10,955 | (257 | ) | 13,337 | ||||||||||||||||
Other expense—intercompany | 145 | 831 | 46 | 162 | 205 | (1,227 | ) | (162 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 216 | $ | 8,705 | $ | 47 | $ | 889 | $ | 1,162 | $ | 20,461 | $ | (889 | ) | $ | 30,591 | ||||||||
Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries | $ | (690 | ) | $ | (10,916 | ) | $ | 801 | $ | — | $ | 350 | $ | (1,945 | ) | $ | (1,448 | ) | $ | (13,848 | ) | ||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (775 | ) | (4,380 | ) | 280 | 11 | 131 | (1,589 | ) | (11 | ) | (6,333 | ) | ||||||||||||
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries | (7,691 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | 7,691 | — | ||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from continuing operations | $ | (7,606 | ) | $ | (6,536 | ) | $ | 521 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 219 | $ | (356 | ) | $ | 6,254 | $ | (7,515 | ) | ||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes | — | — | — | — | — | (35 | ) | — | (35 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests | $ | (7,606 | ) | $ | (6,536 | ) | $ | 521 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 219 | $ | (391 | ) | $ | 6,254 | $ | (7,550 | ) | ||||
Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests | — | — | — | — | — | 56 | — | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
Citigroup's Net Income (Loss) | $ | (7,606 | ) | $ | (6,536 | ) | $ | 521 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 219 | $ | (447 | ) | $ | 6,254 | $ | (7,606 | ) | ||||
| Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries, eliminations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Revenues | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies | $ | 35 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (35 | ) | $ | — | ||||||||
Interest revenue | $ | 177 | $ | 4,199 | $ | 1 | $ | 3,206 | $ | 3,659 | $ | 32,218 | $ | (3,206 | ) | $ | 40,254 | ||||||||
Interest revenue—intercompany | 1,356 | 2,169 | 2,090 | (1,643 | ) | 229 | (5,844 | ) | 1,643 | — | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 4,212 | 1,416 | 965 | 46 | 219 | 7,687 | (46 | ) | 14,499 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense—intercompany | (530 | ) | 1,800 | 439 | (535 | ) | 865 | (2,574 | ) | 535 | — | ||||||||||||||
Net interest revenue | $ | (2,149 | ) | $ | 3,152 | $ | 687 | $ | 2,052 | $ | 2,804 | $ | 21,261 | $ | (2,052 | ) | $ | 25,755 | |||||||
Commissions and fees | $ | — | $ | 3,482 | $ | — | $ | 22 | $ | 59 | $ | 4,527 | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 8,068 | ||||||||
Commissions and fees—intercompany | — | 59 | — | 35 | 44 | (103 | ) | (35 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Principal transactions | 117 | (1,129 | ) | (259 | ) | — | — | 6,972 | — | 5,701 | |||||||||||||||
Principal transactions—intercompany | (221 | ) | 3,910 | (59 | ) | — | (86 | ) | (3,544 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
Other income | 4,672 | 12,620 | 75 | 209 | 347 | (2,748 | ) | (209 | ) | 14,966 | |||||||||||||||
Other income—intercompany | (4,391 | ) | (35 | ) | (61 | ) | 2 | 32 | 4,455 | (2 | ) | — | |||||||||||||
Total non-interest revenues | $ | 177 | $ | 18,907 | $ | (304 | ) | $ | 268 | $ | 396 | $ | 9,559 | $ | (268 | ) | $ | 28,735 | |||||||
Total revenues, net of interest expense | $ | (1,937 | ) | $ | 22,059 | $ | 383 | $ | 2,320 | $ | 3,200 | $ | 30,820 | $ | (2,355 | ) | $ | 54,490 | |||||||
Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims | $ | — | $ | 38 | $ | — | $ | 1,938 | $ | 2,169 | $ | 20,776 | $ | (1,938 | ) | $ | 22,983 | ||||||||
Expenses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and benefits | $ | (45 | ) | $ | 3,673 | $ | — | $ | 259 | $ | 335 | $ | 8,631 | $ | (259 | ) | $ | 12,594 | |||||||
Compensation and benefits— intercompany | 3 | 335 | — | 71 | 71 | (409 | ) | (71 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Other expense | 408 | 1,328 | 1 | 189 | 262 | 9,091 | (189 | ) | 11,090 | ||||||||||||||||
Other expense—intercompany | 97 | 340 | 5 | 273 | 305 | (747 | ) | (273 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | $ | 463 | $ | 5,676 | $ | 6 | $ | 792 | $ | 973 | $ | 16,566 | $ | (792 | ) | $ | 23,684 | ||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries | $ | (2,400 | ) | $ | 16,345 | $ | 377 | $ | (410 | ) | $ | 58 | $ | (6,522 | ) | $ | 375 | $ | 7,823 | ||||||
Income taxes (benefits) | (1,045 | ) | 6,164 | 115 | (148 | ) | 15 | (3,507 | ) | 148 | 1,742 | ||||||||||||||
Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries | 7,227 | — | — | — | — | — | (7,227 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | $ | 5,872 | $ | 10,181 | $ | 262 | $ | (262 | ) | $ | 43 | $ | (3,015 | ) | $ | (7,000 | ) | $ | 6,081 | ||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes | — | — | — | — | — | (259 | ) | — | (259 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests | $ | 5,872 | $ | 10,181 | $ | 262 | $ | (262 | ) | $ | 43 | $ | (3,274 | ) | $ | (7,000 | ) | $ | 5,822 | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | (51 | ) | — | — | — | 1 | — | (50 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Citigroup's net income (loss) | $ | 5,872 | $ | 10,232 | $ | 262 | $ | (262 | ) | $ | 43 | $ | (3,275 | ) | $ | (7,000 | ) | $ | 5,872 | ||||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
| June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | — | $ | 3,044 | $ | — | $ | 152 | $ | 236 | $ | 23,635 | $ | (152 | ) | $ | 26,915 | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks—intercompany | 22 | 804 | 1 | 142 | 157 | (984 | ) | (142 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and resale agreements | — | 159,116 | — | — | — | 20,387 | — | 179,503 | |||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany | — | 23,319 | — | — | — | (23,319 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Trading account assets | 22 | 138,647 | 66 | — | 15 | 186,287 | — | 325,037 | |||||||||||||||||
Trading account assets—intercompany | 1,511 | 9,355 | 1,450 | — | 118 | (12,434 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Investments | 10,902 | 308 | — | 2,263 | 2,550 | 252,997 | (2,263 | ) | 266,757 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans, net of unearned income | — | 505 | — | 45,181 | 51,529 | 589,656 | (45,181 | ) | 641,690 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany | — | — | 146,367 | 5,393 | 6,755 | (153,122 | ) | (5,393 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | — | (148 | ) | — | (3,497 | ) | (3,812 | ) | (31,980 | ) | 3,497 | (35,940 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total loans, net | $ | — | $ | 357 | $ | 146,367 | $ | 47,077 | $ | 54,472 | $ | 404,554 | $ | (47,077 | ) | $ | 605,750 | ||||||||
Advances to subsidiaries | 139,347 | — | — | — | — | (139,347 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in subsidiaries | 199,984 | — | — | — | — | — | (199,984 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 16,042 | 74,306 | 431 | 6,118 | 7,015 | 327,365 | (6,118 | ) | 425,159 | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets—intercompany | 9,450 | 56,526 | 2,885 | 218 | 1,345 | (70,206 | ) | (218 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Assets of discontinued operations held for sale | — | — | — | — | — | 19,412 | — | 19,412 | |||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 377,280 | $ | 465,782 | $ | 151,200 | $ | 55,970 | $ | 65,908 | $ | 988,347 | $ | (255,954 | ) | $ | 1,848,533 | ||||||||
Liabilities and equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 804,736 | $ | — | $ | 804,736 | |||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold | — | 136,748 | — | — | — | 35,268 | — | 172,016 | |||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany | 185 | 6,279 | — | — | — | (6,464 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | — | 68,564 | 72 | — | — | 50,676 | — | 119,312 | |||||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities—intercompany | 842 | 8,788 | 1,455 | — | — | (11,085 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 2,430 | 5,636 | 28,712 | — | 169 | 64,947 | — | 101,894 | |||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings—intercompany | — | 89,049 | 70,863 | 12,766 | 35,663 | (195,575 | ) | (12,766 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 192,295 | 15,134 | 44,120 | 1,764 | 6,917 | 89,580 | (1,764 | ) | 348,046 | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt—intercompany | 640 | 46,027 | 1,208 | 33,480 | 15,661 | (63,536 | ) | (33,480 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Advances from subsidiaries | 16,988 | — | — | — | — | (16,988 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 5,765 | 62,777 | 683 | 1,938 | 1,647 | 65,115 | (1,938 | ) | 135,987 | ||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities—intercompany | 5,833 | 8,301 | 126 | 774 | 340 | (14,600 | ) | (774 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale | — | — | — | — | — | 12,374 | — | 12,374 | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 224,978 | $ | 447,303 | $ | 147,239 | $ | 50,722 | $ | 60,397 | $ | 814,448 | $ | (50,722 | ) | $ | 1,694,365 | ||||||||
Citigroup stockholder's equity | $ | 152,302 | $ | 18,090 | $ | 3,961 | $ | 5,248 | $ | 5,511 | $ | 172,422 | $ | (205,232 | ) | $ | 152,302 | ||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | — | 389 | — | — | — | 1,477 | — | 1,866 | |||||||||||||||||
Total equity | $ | 152,302 | $ | 18,479 | $ | 3,961 | $ | 5,248 | $ | 5,511 | $ | 173,899 | $ | (205,232 | ) | $ | 154,168 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 377,280 | $ | 465,782 | $ | 151,200 | $ | 55,970 | $ | 65,908 | $ | 988,347 | $ | (255,954 | ) | $ | 1,848,533 | ||||||||
| June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | — | $ | 2,011 | $ | — | $ | 202 | $ | 268 | $ | 22,430 | $ | (202 | ) | $ | 24,709 | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks—intercompany | 6 | 2,816 | 1 | 144 | 168 | (2,991 | ) | (144 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and resale agreements | — | 187,987 | — | — | — | 42,797 | — | 230,784 | |||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany | — | 17,696 | — | — | — | (17,696 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Trading account assets | 18 | 138,077 | — | — | 18 | 171,299 | — | 309,412 | |||||||||||||||||
Trading account assets—intercompany | 58 | 7,312 | 31 | — | — | (7,401 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Investments | 10,413 | 198 | — | 2,455 | 2,550 | 303,905 | (2,455 | ) | 317,066 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans, net of unearned income | — | 396 | — | 35,996 | 41,219 | 650,551 | (35,996 | ) | 692,166 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany | — | — | 82,130 | 3,525 | 7,992 | (90,122 | ) | (3,525 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | — | (42 | ) | — | (3,468 | ) | (3,818 | ) | (42,337 | ) | 3,468 | (46,197 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total loans, net | $ | — | $ | 354 | $ | 82,130 | $ | 36,053 | $ | 45,393 | $ | 518,092 | $ | (36,053 | ) | $ | 645,969 | ||||||||
Advances to subsidiaries | 137,718 | — | — | — | — | (137,718 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in subsidiaries | 205,029 | — | — | — | — | — | (205,029 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 18,353 | 70,693 | 683 | 9,127 | 10,068 | 309,919 | (9,127 | ) | 409,716 | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets—intercompany | 13,807 | 33,963 | 2,292 | 6 | 1,718 | (51,780 | ) | (6 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 385,402 | $ | 461,107 | $ | 85,137 | $ | 47,987 | $ | 60,183 | $ | 1,150,856 | $ | (253,016 | ) | $ | 1,937,656 | ||||||||
Liabilities and equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 813,951 | $ | — | $ | 813,951 | |||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold | — | 151,947 | — | — | — | 44,165 | — | 196,112 | |||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany | 185 | 7,204 | — | — | — | (7,389 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | — | 78,199 | 94 | — | — | 52,708 | — | 131,001 | |||||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities—intercompany | 56 | 5,249 | 174 | — | — | (5,479 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 19 | 3,388 | 11,730 | — | 656 | 76,959 | — | 92,752 | |||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings—intercompany | — | 56,938 | 17,240 | 8,297 | 2,941 | (77,119 | ) | (8,297 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 188,756 | 10,352 | 51,975 | 1,297 | 4,724 | 157,490 | (1,297 | ) | 413,297 | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt—intercompany | 354 | 58,205 | 1,829 | 29,512 | 42,499 | (102,887 | ) | (29,512 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Advances from subsidiaries | 26,590 | — | — | — | — | (26,590 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 7,756 | 60,507 | 336 | 3,034 | 3,007 | 61,607 | (3,034 | ) | 133,213 | ||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities—intercompany | 6,880 | 12,904 | 117 | 1,031 | 490 | (20,391 | ) | (1,031 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 230,596 | $ | 444,893 | $ | 83,495 | $ | 43,171 | $ | 54,317 | $ | 967,025 | $ | (43,171 | ) | $ | 1,780,326 | ||||||||
Citigroup stockholders' equity | 154,806 | 15,785 | 1,642 | 4,816 | 5,866 | 181,736 | (209,845 | ) | 154,806 | ||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | — | 429 | — | — | — | 2,095 | — | 2,524 | |||||||||||||||||
Total equity | $ | 154,806 | $ | 16,214 | $ | 1,642 | $ | 4,816 | $ | 5,866 | $ | 183,831 | $ | (209,845 | ) | $ | 157,330 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 385,402 | $ | 461,107 | $ | 85,137 | $ | 47,987 | $ | 60,183 | $ | 1,150,856 | $ | (253,016 | ) | $ | 1,937,656 | ||||||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETCondensed Consolidating Balance Sheet
| December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | — | $ | 3,142 | $ | — | $ | 149 | $ | 211 | $ | 25,900 | $ | (149 | ) | $ | 29,253 | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks—intercompany | 13 | 1,415 | 1 | 141 | 185 | (1,614 | ) | (141 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and resale agreements | — | 167,589 | — | — | — | 16,544 | — | 184,133 | |||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany | — | 31,446 | — | — | — | (31,446 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Trading account assets | 20 | 155,136 | 88 | — | 15 | 222,376 | — | 377,635 | |||||||||||||||||
Trading account assets—intercompany | 818 | 11,197 | 4,439 | — | 182 | (16,636 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Investments | 25,611 | 382 | — | 2,059 | 2,366 | 227,661 | (2,059 | ) | 256,020 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans, net of unearned income | — | 663 | — | 48,663 | 55,387 | 638,166 | (48,663 | ) | 694,216 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany | — | — | 134,744 | 3,433 | 11,129 | (145,873 | ) | (3,433 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | — | (122 | ) | — | (3,415 | ) | (3,649 | ) | (25,845 | ) | 3,415 | (29,616 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total loans, net | $ | — | $ | 541 | $ | 134,744 | $ | 48,681 | $ | 62,867 | $ | 466,448 | $ | (48,681 | ) | $ | 664,600 | ||||||||
Advances to subsidiaries | 167,043 | — | — | — | — | (167,043 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in subsidiaries | 149,424 | — | — | — | — | — | (149,424 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 12,148 | 74,740 | 51 | 6,156 | 6,970 | 332,920 | (6,156 | ) | 426,829 | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets—intercompany | 14,998 | 108,952 | 3,997 | 254 | 504 | (128,451 | ) | (254 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 370,075 | $ | 554,540 | $ | 143,320 | $ | 57,440 | $ | 73,300 | $ | 946,659 | $ | (206,864 | ) | $ | 1,938,470 | ||||||||
Liabilities and equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 774,185 | $ | — | $ | 774,185 | |||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold | — | 165,914 | — | — | — | 39,379 | — | 205,293 | |||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany | 8,673 | 34,007 | — | — | — | (42,680 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | — | 70,006 | 14 | — | — | 97,458 | — | 167,478 | |||||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities—intercompany | 732 | 12,751 | 2,660 | — | — | (16,143 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 2,571 | 9,735 | 30,994 | — | 222 | 83,169 | — | 126,691 | |||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings—intercompany | — | 87,432 | 66,615 | 6,360 | 39,637 | (193,684 | ) | (6,360 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 192,290 | 20,623 | 37,374 | 2,214 | 8,333 | 100,973 | (2,214 | ) | 359,593 | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt—intercompany | — | 60,318 | 878 | 40,722 | 17,655 | (78,851 | ) | (40,722 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Advances from subsidiaries | 7,660 | — | — | — | — | (7,660 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 7,347 | 75,247 | 855 | 1,907 | 1,808 | 75,951 | (1,907 | ) | 161,208 | ||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities—intercompany | 9,172 | 10,213 | 232 | 833 | 332 | (19,949 | ) | (833 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 228,445 | $ | 546,246 | $ | 139,622 | $ | 52,036 | $ | 67,987 | $ | 812,148 | $ | (52,036 | ) | $ | 1,794,448 | ||||||||
Citigroup stockholders' equity | 141,630 | 7,819 | 3,698 | 5,404 | 5,313 | 132,594 | (154,828 | ) | 141,630 | ||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | — | 475 | — | — | — | 1,917 | — | 2,392 | |||||||||||||||||
Total equity | $ | 141,630 | $ | 8,294 | $ | 3,698 | $ | 5,404 | $ | 5,313 | $ | 134,511 | $ | (154,828 | ) | $ | 144,022 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 370,075 | $ | 554,540 | $ | $143,320 | $ | 57,440 | $ | 73,300 | $ | 946,659 | $ | (206,864 | ) | $ | 1,938,470 | ||||||||
| December 31, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Assets | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | — | $ | 1,801 | $ | — | $ | 198 | $ | 297 | $ | 23,374 | $ | (198 | ) | $ | 25,472 | ||||||||
Cash and due from banks—intercompany | 5 | 3,146 | 1 | 145 | 168 | (3,320 | ) | (145 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and resale agreements | — | 199,760 | — | — | — | 22,262 | — | 222,022 | |||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany | — | 20,626 | — | — | — | (20,626 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Trading account assets | 26 | 140,777 | 71 | — | 17 | 201,882 | — | 342,773 | |||||||||||||||||
Trading account assets—intercompany | 196 | 6,812 | 788 | — | — | (7,796 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Investments | 13,318 | 237 | — | 2,293 | 2,506 | 290,058 | (2,293 | ) | 306,119 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans, net of unearned income | — | 248 | — | 42,739 | 48,821 | 542,435 | (42,739 | ) | 591,504 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany | — | — | 129,317 | 3,387 | 7,261 | (136,578 | ) | (3,387 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses | — | (83 | ) | — | (3,680 | ) | (4,056 | ) | (31,894 | ) | 3,680 | (36,033 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total loans, net | $ | — | $ | 165 | $ | 129,317 | $ | 42,446 | $ | 52,026 | $ | 373,963 | $ | (42,446 | ) | $ | 555,471 | ||||||||
Advances to subsidiaries | 144,497 | — | — | — | — | (144,497 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in subsidiaries | 210,895 | — | — | — | — | — | (210,895 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 14,196 | 69,907 | 1,186 | 6,440 | 7,317 | 312,183 | (6,440 | ) | 404,789 | ||||||||||||||||
Other assets—intercompany | 10,412 | 38,047 | 3,168 | 47 | 1,383 | (53,010 | ) | (47 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 393,545 | $ | 481,278 | $ | 134,531 | $ | 51,569 | $ | 63,714 | $ | 994,473 | $ | (262,464 | ) | $ | 1,856,646 | ||||||||
Liabilities and equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 835,903 | $ | — | $ | 835,903 | |||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold | — | 124,522 | — | — | — | 29,759 | — | 154,281 | |||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany | 185 | 18,721 | — | — | — | (18,906 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities | — | 82,905 | 115 | — | — | 54,492 | — | 137,512 | |||||||||||||||||
Trading account liabilities—intercompany | 198 | 7,495 | 1,082 | — | — | (8,775 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings | 1,177 | 4,593 | 10,136 | — | 379 | 52,594 | — | 68,879 | |||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings—intercompany | — | 69,306 | 62,336 | 3,304 | 33,818 | (165,460 | ) | (3,304 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt | 197,804 | 13,422 | 55,499 | 2,893 | 7,542 | 89,752 | (2,893 | ) | 364,019 | ||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt—intercompany | 367 | 62,050 | 1,039 | 37,600 | 14,278 | (77,734 | ) | (37,600 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Advances from subsidiaries | 30,275 | — | — | — | — | (30,275 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 5,985 | 70,477 | 585 | 1,772 | 1,742 | 62,290 | (1,772 | ) | 141,079 | ||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities—intercompany | 4,854 | 7,911 | 198 | 1,080 | 386 | (13,349 | ) | (1,080 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | $ | 240,845 | $ | 461,402 | $ | 130,990 | $ | 46,649 | $ | 58,145 | $ | 810,291 | $ | (46,649 | ) | $ | 1,701,673 | ||||||||
Citigroup stockholders' equity | 152,700 | 19,448 | 3,541 | 4,920 | 5,569 | 182,337 | (215,815 | ) | 152,700 | ||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interest | — | 428 | — | — | — | 1,845 | — | 2,273 | |||||||||||||||||
Total equity | $ | 152,700 | $ | 19,876 | $ | 3,541 | $ | 4,920 | $ | 5,569 | $ | 184,182 | $ | (215,815 | ) | $ | 154,973 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and equity | $ | 393,545 | $ | 481,278 | $ | 134,531 | $ | 51,569 | $ | 63,714 | $ | 994,473 | $ | (262,464 | ) | $ | 1,856,646 | ||||||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
| Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | $ | (3,928 | ) | $ | 21,483 | $ | 2,262 | $ | 2,226 | $ | 2,008 | $ | (42,562 | ) | $ | (2,226 | ) | $ | (20,737 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in loans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (11,257 | ) | $ | 1,081 | $ | 1,175 | $ | (76,652 | ) | $ | (1,081 | ) | $ | (86,734 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans | — | 163 | — | — | — | 126,871 | — | 127,034 | |||||||||||||||||
Purchases of investments | (12,895 | ) | (13 | ) | — | (401 | ) | (431 | ) | (107,022 | ) | 401 | (120,361 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of investments | 6,892 | — | — | 159 | 191 | 40,358 | (159 | ) | 47,441 | ||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investments | 19,559 | — | — | 185 | 216 | 37,761 | (185 | ) | 57,536 | ||||||||||||||||
Changes in investments and advances—intercompany | (12,386 | ) | — | — | (1,960 | ) | 4,374 | 8,012 | 1,960 | — | |||||||||||||||
Business acquisitions | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Other investing activities | — | (4,104 | ) | — | — | — | (4,355 | ) | — | (8,459 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | $ | 1,170 | $ | (3,954 | ) | $ | (11,257 | ) | $ | (936 | ) | $ | 5,525 | $ | 24,973 | $ | 936 | $ | 16,457 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid | $ | (2,539 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | (2,539 | ) | ||||||||
Dividends paid-intercompany | (119 | ) | — | — | — | — | 119 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance of preferred stock | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock acquired | (2 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net | 4,231 | (1,515 | ) | 6,975 | (450 | ) | (1,416 | ) | (14,722 | ) | 450 | (6,447 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt-intercompany, net | — | (14,241 | ) | — | (7,242 | ) | (1,994 | ) | 16,235 | 7,242 | — | ||||||||||||||
Change in deposits | — | — | — | — | — | 30,552 | — | 30,552 | |||||||||||||||||
Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party | — | (4,099 | ) | (2,372 | ) | 6,406 | (152 | ) | (13,874 | ) | (6,406 | ) | (20,497 | ) | |||||||||||
Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany | 1,304 | 1,617 | 4,397 | — | (3,974 | ) | (3,344 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Capital contributions from parent | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Other financing activities | (108 | ) | — | (5 | ) | — | — | 5 | — | (108 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | $ | 2,767 | $ | (18,238 | ) | $ | 8,995 | $ | (1,286 | ) | $ | (7,536 | ) | $ | 14,971 | $ | 1,286 | $ | 959 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks | $ | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 171 | — | $ | 171 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash used in discontinued operations | $ | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 812 | — | $ | 812 | ||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks | $ | 9 | $ | (709 | ) | $ | — | $ | 4 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (1,635 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (2,338 | ) | ||||
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period | 13 | 4,557 | 1 | 290 | 396 | 24,286 | (290 | ) | 29,253 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks at end of period | $ | 22 | $ | 3,848 | $ | 1 | $ | 294 | $ | 393 | $ | 22,651 | $ | (294 | ) | $ | 26,915 | ||||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year for: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes | $ | (36 | ) | $ | (522 | ) | $ | 280 | $ | (172 | ) | $ | 193 | $ | (500 | ) | $ | 172 | $ | (585 | ) | ||||
Interest | 4,282 | 4,448 | 1,641 | 1,893 | 408 | 4,305 | (1,893 | ) | 15,084 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-cash investing activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers to repossessed assets | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 779 | $ | 806 | $ | 557 | $ | (779 | ) | $ | 1,363 | ||||||||
| Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | $ | 3,845 | $ | 20,709 | $ | 1,277 | $ | (3,652 | ) | $ | (3,356 | ) | $ | 19,126 | $ | 3,652 | $ | 41,601 | |||||||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in loans | $ | — | $ | 32 | $ | 47,497 | $ | 7,382 | $ | 8,040 | $ | (255 | ) | $ | (7,382 | ) | $ | 55,314 | |||||||
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans | — | 68 | — | 126 | 126 | 3,558 | (126 | ) | 3,752 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchases of investments | (2,796 | ) | (4 | ) | — | (342 | ) | (348 | ) | (197,699 | ) | 342 | (200,847 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of investments | 874 | 32 | — | 109 | 220 | 77,857 | (109 | ) | 78,983 | ||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investments | 5,079 | — | — | 143 | 152 | 90,575 | (143 | ) | 95,806 | ||||||||||||||||
Changes in investments and advances—intercompany | 2,643 | 3,475 | — | (138 | ) | (731 | ) | (5,387 | ) | 138 | — | ||||||||||||||
Business acquisitions | (20 | ) | — | — | — | — | 20 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Other investing activities | — | 588 | — | — | — | 6,682 | — | 7,270 | |||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | $ | 5,780 | $ | 4,191 | $ | 47,497 | $ | 7,280 | $ | 7,459 | $ | (24,649 | ) | $ | (7,280 | ) | $ | 40,278 | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Dividends paid-intercompany | — | (5,500 | ) | (1,500 | ) | — | — | 7,000 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance of preferred stock | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock acquired | (5 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | (5 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net | (6,821 | ) | (2,065 | ) | (3,773 | ) | (530 | ) | (1,752 | ) | (14,201 | ) | 530 | (28,612 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt-intercompany, net | — | (3,882 | ) | — | (8,088 | ) | (2,279 | ) | 6,161 | 8,088 | — | ||||||||||||||
Change in deposits | — | — | — | — | — | (21,952 | ) | — | (21,952 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party | 11 | (1,205 | ) | 1,734 | — | 277 | (34,044 | ) | — | (33,227 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany | (3,960 | ) | (12,368 | ) | (45,235 | ) | 4,993 | (377 | ) | 61,940 | (4,993 | ) | — | ||||||||||||
Capital contributions from parent | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Other financing activities | 1,151 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,151 | |||||||||||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities | $ | (9,624 | ) | $ | (25,020 | ) | $ | (48,774 | ) | $ | (3,625 | ) | $ | (4,131 | ) | $ | 4,904 | $ | 3,625 | $ | (82,645 | ) | |||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (48 | ) | $ | — | $ | (48 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by discontinued operations | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 51 | $ | — | $ | 51 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks | $ | 1 | $ | (120 | ) | $ | — | $ | 3 | $ | (28 | ) | $ | (616 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (763 | ) | ||||
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period | 5 | 4,947 | 1 | 343 | 464 | 20,055 | (343 | ) | 25,472 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks at end of period | $ | 6 | $ | 4,827 | $ | 1 | $ | 346 | $ | 436 | $ | 19,439 | $ | (346 | ) | $ | 24,709 | ||||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year for: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes | $ | (308 | ) | $ | 117 | $ | 259 | $ | (142 | ) | $ | 181 | $ | 2,520 | $ | 142 | $ | 2,769 | |||||||
Interest | 4,703 | 2,430 | 642 | 1,145 | 781 | 3,545 | (1,145 | ) | 12,101 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-cash investing activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers to repossessed assets | $ | — | $ | 193 | $ | — | $ | 683 | $ | 714 | $ | 591 | $ | (683 | ) | $ | 1,498 | ||||||||
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSCondensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
| Six Months Ended June, 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations | $ | 2,478 | $ | 849 | $ | 891 | $ | 2,225 | $ | 2,383 | $ | 46,547 | $ | (2,225 | ) | $ | 53,148 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in loans | $ | — | $ | 91 | $ | (6,360 | ) | $ | (2,288 | ) | $ | (2,442 | ) | $ | (126,192 | ) | $ | 2,288 | $ | (134,903 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans | — | 26 | — | — | — | 142,913 | — | 142,939 | |||||||||||||||||
Purchases of investments | (124,202 | ) | (159 | ) | — | (525 | ) | (734 | ) | (88,375 | ) | 525 | (213,470 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of investments | 10,206 | — | — | 128 | 275 | 48,784 | (128 | ) | 59,265 | ||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investments | 89,480 | — | 2 | 278 | 316 | 41,668 | (278 | ) | 131,466 | ||||||||||||||||
Changes in investments and advances—intercompany | (15,297 | ) | — | — | (1,695 | ) | (525 | ) | 15,822 | 1,695 | — | ||||||||||||||
Business acquisitions | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Other investing activities | — | (20,351 | ) | — | — | — | 22,479 | — | 2,128 | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities | $ | (39,813 | ) | $ | (20,393 | ) | $ | (6,358 | ) | $ | (4,102 | ) | $ | (3,110 | ) | $ | 57,099 | $ | 4,102 | $ | (12,575 | ) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid | $ | (3,873 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (3,873 | ) | |||||||
Dividends paid-intercompany | (119 | ) | (59 | ) | — | — | — | 178 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 4,961 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4,961 | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance/(Redemptions) of preferred stock | 27,424 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 27,424 | |||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock acquired | (6 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | (6 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net | 10,015 | (8,685 | ) | 8,599 | (618 | ) | (1,414 | ) | (16,417 | ) | 618 | (7,902 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt-intercompany, net | — | 19,176 | — | (3,284 | ) | (2,176 | ) | (17,000 | ) | 3,284 | — | ||||||||||||||
Change in deposits | — | — | — | — | — | (22,588 | ) | — | (22,588 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party | (4,347 | ) | (1,521 | ) | (1,941 | ) | — | 352 | (24,586 | ) | — | (32,043 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany | 3,611 | 9,430 | (1,163 | ) | 5,764 | 3,955 | (15,833 | ) | (5,764 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Capital contributions from parent | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Other financing activities | (325 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | (325 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | $ | 37,341 | $ | 18,341 | $ | 5,495 | $ | 1,862 | $ | 717 | $ | (96,246 | ) | $ | (1,862 | ) | $ | (34,352 | ) | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 212 | $ | — | $ | 212 | |||||||||
Net cash from discontinued operations | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 185 | $ | — | $ | 185 | |||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks | $ | 6 | $ | (1,203 | ) | $ | 28 | $ | (15 | ) | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 7,797 | $ | 15 | $ | 6,618 | ||||||
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period | 19 | 5,297 | 2 | 321 | 440 | 32,448 | (321 | ) | 38,206 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks at end of period | $ | 25 | $ | 4,094 | $ | 30 | $ | 306 | $ | 430 | $ | 40,245 | $ | (306 | ) | $ | 44,824 | ||||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year for: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes | $ | 952 | $ | (2,599 | ) | $ | 160 | $ | 149 | $ | 24 | $ | 2,378 | $ | (149 | ) | $ | 915 | |||||||
Interest | 4,853 | 10,249 | 2,113 | 1,428 | 184 | 13,457 | (1,428 | ) | 30,856 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-cash investing activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers to repossessed assets | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 712 | $ | 741 | $ | 764 | $ | (712 | ) | $ | 1,505 | ||||||||
| Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
In millions of dollars | Citigroup parent company | CGMHI | CFI | CCC | Associates | Other Citigroup subsidiaries and eliminations | Consolidating adjustments | Citigroup Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | $ | (3,928 | ) | $ | 21,483 | $ | 2,262 | $ | 2,226 | $ | 2,008 | $ | (42,252 | ) | $ | (2,226 | ) | $ | (20,427 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change in loans | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (11,257 | ) | $ | 1,081 | $ | 1,175 | $ | (76,652 | ) | $ | (1,081 | ) | $ | (86,734 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans | — | 163 | — | — | — | 126,871 | — | 127,034 | |||||||||||||||||
Purchases of investments | (12,895 | ) | (13 | ) | — | (401 | ) | (431 | ) | (107,022 | ) | 401 | (120,361 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of investments | 6,892 | — | — | 159 | 191 | 40,358 | (159 | ) | 47,441 | ||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of investments | 19,559 | — | — | 185 | 216 | 37,761 | (185 | ) | 57,536 | ||||||||||||||||
Changes in investments and advances—intercompany | (12,386 | ) | — | — | (1,960 | ) | 4,374 | 8,012 | 1,960 | — | |||||||||||||||
Business acquisitions | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Other investing activities | — | (4,104 | ) | — | — | — | (4,355 | ) | — | (8,459 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | $ | 1,170 | $ | (3,954 | ) | $ | (11,257 | ) | $ | (936 | ) | $ | 5,525 | $ | 24,973 | $ | 936 | $ | 16,457 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid | $ | (2,539 | ) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | (2,539 | ) | ||||||||
Dividends paid-intercompany | (119 | ) | — | — | — | — | 119 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance of preferred stock | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Treasury stock acquired | (2 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net | 4,231 | (1,515 | ) | 6,975 | (450 | ) | (1,416 | ) | (14,722 | ) | 450 | (6,447 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt-intercompany, net | — | (14,241 | ) | — | (7,242 | ) | (1,994 | ) | 16,235 | 7,242 | — | ||||||||||||||
Change in deposits | — | — | — | — | — | 30,552 | — | 30,552 | |||||||||||||||||
Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party | — | (4,099 | ) | (2,372 | ) | 6,406 | (152 | ) | (13,874 | ) | (6,406 | ) | (20,497 | ) | |||||||||||
Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany | 1,304 | 1,617 | 4,397 | — | (3,974 | ) | (3,344 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Capital contributions from parent | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
Other financing activities | (108 | ) | — | (5 | ) | — | — | 5 | — | (108 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | $ | 2,767 | $ | (18,238 | ) | $ | 8,995 | $ | (1,286 | ) | $ | (7,536 | ) | $ | 14,971 | $ | 1,286 | $ | 959 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks | $ | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 171 | — | $ | 171 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by discontinued operations | $ | — | — | — | — | — | $ | 502 | — | $ | 502 | ||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks | $ | 9 | $ | (709 | ) | $ | — | $ | 4 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (1,635 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (2,338 | ) | ||||
Cash and due from banks at beginning of period | 13 | 4,557 | 1 | 290 | 396 | 24,286 | (290 | ) | 29,253 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks at end of period | $ | 22 | $ | 3,848 | $ | 1 | $ | 294 | $ | 393 | $ | 22,651 | $ | (294 | ) | $ | 26,915 | ||||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year for: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes | $ | (36 | ) | $ | (522 | ) | $ | 280 | $ | (172 | ) | $ | 193 | $ | (500 | ) | $ | 172 | $ | (585 | ) | ||||
Interest | 4,282 | 4,448 | 1,641 | 1,893 | 408 | 4,305 | (1,893 | ) | 15,084 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-cash investing activities: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers to repossessed assets | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 779 | $ | 806 | $ | 557 | $ | (779 | ) | $ | 1,363 | ||||||||
The following information supplements and amends our discussion set forth under Part I, Item 3 "Legal Proceedings" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008,2009 (2009 Form 10-K), as updated by our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.2010.
Enron
On May 14, 2009, a settlement agreement was executed among the parties in DK ACQUISITION PARTNERS, L.P., ET AL. v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., ET AL. and AVENUE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT II, L.P., ET AL. v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., ET AL. On June 3, 2009, a settlement agreement was executed among the parties in UNICREDITO ITALIANO, SpA, ET AL. v. J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, ET AL. The three actions, which were consolidated and pending trial in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, were brought against Citigroup and certain of its affiliates, and JPMorgan Chase and certain of its affiliates, in their capacity as co-agents on certain Enron revolving credit facilities. Pursuant to the settlements, the cases were dismissed with prejudice.
Research
On June 3, 2009, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit certified several Georgia state law questions to be resolved by the Georgia Supreme Court in HOLMES, ET AL. v. GRUBMAN, ET AL.
Subprime Mortgage—RelatedCredit-Crisis-Related Litigation and Other Matters
Securities Actions. On April 17, As discussed at pages 263-265 of our 2009 a putative class action BRECHER, ET AL. v. CGMI, ET AL. was filed in California state courtForm 10-K, Citigroup and its affiliates continue to defend lawsuits and arbitrations asserting claims againstfor damages and other relief for losses arising from the global financial credit and subprime-mortgage crisis that began in 2007. These actions, which assert a variety of claims under federal and state law, include, among other matters, class actions brought on behalf of putative classes of investors in various securities issued by Citigroup CGMI, and certain of the Company's current and former directors under California's Business and Professions Code and Labor Code, as well as under California common law, relatingactions asserted by individual investors and counterparties to amongvarious transactions, and are pending in various state and federal courts as well as before arbitration tribunals. These actions are at various procedural stages of litigation.
In addition to these litigations and arbitrations, Citigroup continues to cooperate fully in response to subpoenas and requests for information from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other things, losses incurred on common stock awarded to Smith Barney financial advisorsgovernment agencies in connection with various formal and informal inquiries concerning Citigroup's subprime-mortgage-related conduct and business activities, as well as other business activities affected by the executioncredit crisis. On July 29, 2010, the SEC announced the settlement of an investigation into certain of Citigroup's 2007 disclosures concerning its subprime-related business activities. In connection with the settlement, Citigroup agreed to pay a civil penalty in the amount of $75 million. The settlement is subject to court approval.
In accordance with ASC 450 (formerly SFAS 5), Citigroup establishes accruals for all litigation and regulatory matters, including matters related to the credit crisis, when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, accruals are adjusted from time to time, as appropriate, in light of additional information. The amount of loss ultimately incurred in relation to those matters may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those matters.
Certain of these matters assert claims for substantial or indeterminate damages. The claims asserted in these matters typically are broad, often spanning a multi-year period and sometimes a wide range of business activities, and the plaintiffs' alleged damages typically are not quantified or factually supported in the complaint. The most significant of these matters remains in very preliminary stages, with few or no substantive legal decisions by the court or tribunal defining the scope of the claims, the class (if any), or the potentially available damages, and fact discovery is still in progress or not yet begun. In many of these matters, Citigroup has not yet answered the complaint or asserted its defenses. For all these reasons, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, for these matters or predict the timing of their employment contracts. On May 19, 2009,eventual resolution.
Subject to the foregoing, it is the opinion of Citigroup's management, based on current knowledge and after taking into account available insurance coverage and its current accruals, that the eventual outcome of these matters would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of Citi. Nonetheless, given the inherent unpredictability of litigation and the substantial or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters, an amended complaint was filed.adverse outcome in certain of these matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on Citi's consolidated results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.
Subprime-Mortgage-Related Litigation and Other Matters
Securities Actions: On July 9, 2009,12, 2010, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation was notified that BRECHER, ET AL. v. CGMI, ET AL. is a potential tag-along action to IN RE CITIGROUP, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. On July 15, 2009, after having removed the case to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, defendants filed motionsdistrict court issued an order and opinion granting in part and denying in part defendants' motion to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint and to stay all further proceedings pending resolution of the tag-along petition.
On May 7, 2009, BUCKINGHAM v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. and CHEN v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. were consolidated within IN RE CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION.
On May 11, 2009, In this action, lead plaintiffs assert claims on behalf of a putative class action ASHER, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. was filedof purchasers of forty-eight corporate debt securities, preferred stock, and interests in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging violationspreferred stock issued by Citigroup and related issuers over a two-year period from 2006 to 2008. The court's order, among other things, dismissed plaintiffs' claims under Section 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 in connection with plaintiffs' investments in certain offerings of preferred stock issued by the Company. On May 15, 2009, plaintiffs in IN RE CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION requested that ASHER and PELLEGRINI v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. be consolidated with IN RE CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION.
On May 20, 2009, EPIRUS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. was designated as related to IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. On June 10 and June 24, 2009, defendants filed motionsbut denied defendants' motion to dismiss the verified complaint.
Derivative Actions. On July 16, 2009, a derivative lawsuit LERNER v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. was filed in New York state court against various current and former officers and directorscertain claims under Section 11 of Citigroup alleging derivative claims of mismanagement and breach of fiduciary duty in connection with subprime mortgage—related exposures.
Other Matters.
Underwriting Actions. In its capacity as a member of various underwriting syndicates, CGMI also has been named as a defendant in several subprime-related actions asserted against various issuers of debt and other securities. Most of these actions involve claims asserted on behalf of putative classes of purchasers of securitiesthat Act. A motion for alleged violations of Sections 11 and 12(a)(2)partial reconsideration of the Securities Actlatter ruling is pending. Fact discovery has not yet begun, a class certification motion has not yet been filed, and plaintiffs have not yet quantified the putative class's alleged damages. Because of 1933.
American Home Mortgage. On July 7, 2009,the preliminary stage of the proceedings, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, for this action or predict the timing of its eventual resolution. Additional information relating to this action is publicly available in court filings under the consolidated lead plaintiffs filed a motion in IN RE AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SECURITIES LITIGATION for preliminary approval of settlements reached with all defendants (including Citigroup and CGMI)docket number 08 Civ. 9522 (S.D.N.Y.) (Stein, J.).
AIG. On March 20, 2009, four putative class actions were consolidated by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under the caption IN RE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. 2008 SECURITIES LITIGATION. Plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint on May 19, 2009, which includes two Citigroup affiliates among the underwriter defendants.
Public NuisanceSubprime Counterparty and Related Actions. On May 15, 2009, CITY OF CLEVELAND v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., ET AL. was dismissed with prejudice. The City of Cleveland has appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Investor Actions:Counterparty Actions. Counterparties to transactions involving CDOs, SIVs, credit default swaps ("CDS"), and other instruments related to investments in mortgage-backed securities have sued Citigroup on a variety of theories. On August 3, 2009, one such counterparty filed an action—AMBAC CREDIT PRODUCTS, LLC v. CITIGROUP INC., et al.—in New York Supreme Court, County of New York, alleging various claims including fraud and breach of fiduciary duty in connection with Citigroup's purchase of CDS from Ambac as credit protection for a $1.95 billion super-senior tranche of a CDO structured by Citigroup, the underlying assets of which allegedly included subprime mortgage-backed securities. Ambac alleges, among other things, that Citigroup misrepresented the nature of the risks that were being transferred.
Governmental and Regulatory Matters. Citigroup and certain of its affiliates are subject to formal and informal investigations, as well as subpoenas and/or requests for information, from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies relating to subprime mortgage—related activities. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully and are engaged in discussions on these matters.
Auction Rate Securities—Related Litigation and Other Matters
Securities Actions. On June 10, 2009,7, 2010, in connection with a global settlement agreement between Ambac and Citigroup, the Judicial Panelparties stipulated to a discontinuation with prejudice of a lawsuit brought by Ambac Credit Products LLC.
Lehman Structured Notes Matters
In Turkey, Hungary and Greece, Citigroup has made a settlement offer to all eligible purchasers of notes distributed by Citigroup in those countries. A significant majority of the eligible purchasers have accepted this offer.
In Belgium, the criminal trial against a Citigroup subsidiary, two current employees and one former employee has been completed. The court is scheduled to deliver its judgment on MultidistrictDecember 1, 2010. The Public Prosecutor seeks a monetary penalty of approximately 132 million Euro.
Research Analyst Litigation granted CGMI's motion to transfer AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS, INC., ET AL.
On June 23, 2010, the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the remaining claims in HOLMES v. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC. from the UnitedGRUBMAN.
States DistrictCash Balance Plan Litigation
On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court denied plaintiffs' petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the Second Circuit's decision.
Terra Firma Litigation
Plaintiffs, general partners of two related private equity funds, filed a complaint in New York state court against certain Citigroup entities in December 2009, alleging that 21/2 years earlier, during the May 2007 auction of the music company EMI, Citigroup, as advisor to EMI and as a potential lender to plaintiffs' acquisition vehicle Maltby, fraudulently or negligently orally misrepresented the intentions of another potential bidder regarding the auction. Plaintiffs allege that but for the Western Districtoral misrepresentations Maltby would not have acquired EMI for approximately £4 billion. Plaintiffs further allege that, following the acquisition of PennsylvaniaEMI, certain Citigroup entities have tortiously interfered with plaintiffs' business relationship with EMI. Plaintiffs seek billions of dollars in damages. Citigroup believes it has strong factual and legal defenses to the claims asserted by plaintiffs, including that no misrepresentation occurred, plaintiffs did not rely on the alleged misrepresentation in making their multi-billion-dollar investment in EMI, Citigroup has properly exercised its legal rights as a lender in relation to the approximately £2.5 billion of financing it provided Maltby, and plaintiffs suffered no damages. Because, among other reasons, the parties have widely divergent views of the merits, and they have not yet briefed either summary judgment motions that may resolve the matter in whole or significant part or motions in limine that may limit the testimony a jury would hear at trial, including as to damages, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, for this action. The case, captioned TERRA FIRMA INVESTMENTS (GP) 2 LIMITED, et al., v. CITIGROUP, INC., et al., was removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, where it will be coordinated with IN RE CITIGROUP INC. AUCTION RATE SECURITIES LITIGATION and FINN v. SMITH BARNEY, ET AL. On June 17, 2009,is currently pending under docket number 09-cv-10459 (JSR). Additional information regarding the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order conditionally transferring three other individual auction rate securities actions pending against CGMIaction is publicly available in other federal courts to the United States District Courtcourt filings under that docket number. Trial is scheduled for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiffs in those actions have opposed their transfer.October 2010.
Asset Repurchase Matters
On April 1, 2009, TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. v. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., ET AL. wasBeginning in March 2010, various regulators have made inquiries regarding the accounting treatment of certain repurchase transactions. Citigroup is cooperating fully with these inquiries.
Payments required in settlement agreements described above have been made or are covered by existing accruals. Additional lawsuits containing claims similar to those described above may be filed in Texas state court asserting violations of state securities law by CGMI, BNY Capital Markets, Inc. and Morgan Stanley and Co., Inc. Defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and plaintiff has moved to have it remanded to state court. On May 8, 2009, CGMI filed a motion to sever the claims against it from the claims against its co-defendants.
Governmental and Regulatory Actions. Citigroup and certain of its affiliates are subject to formal and informal investigations, as well as subpoenas and/or requests for information, from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies relating to auction rate securities. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully and are engaged in discussions on these matters.
Falcon and ASTA/MAT-Related Litigation and Other Matters
Marie Raymond Revocable Trust, et al. v. MAT Five LLC, et al. On June 19, 2009, the Delaware Supreme Court denied the appeal of the settlement objectors from the Delaware Chancery Court's approval of the settlement of this matter and affirmed the order approving the settlement.
In re MAT Five Securities Litigation. On July 8, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York approved the voluntary dismissal of this action.
Puglisi v. Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC, et al. On May 29, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied plaintiff's motion to remand this action to state court. On July 8, 2009, the District Court dismissed this action without prejudice in connection with the dismissal of IN RE MAT FIVE SECURITIES LITIGATION.
ECA Acquisitions, Inc., et al. v. MAT Three LLC, et al. On May 1, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied plaintiffs' motion to remand this action to state court. On July 15, 2009, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint.
Zentner v. Citigroup, et al. (putative class action concerning MAT 2, 3 and 5, which was consolidated with IN RE MAT FIVE SECURITIES LITIGATION). On July 8, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed this action, without prejudice, in connection with the dismissal of IN RE MAT FIVE SECURITIES LITIGATION.
Zentner v. Citigroup, et al. (putative class action concerning Falcon Plus). On May 19, 2009, the New York Supreme Court issued a letter order, stating that it would approve a settlement of plaintiff's individual claims. Plaintiff filed a stipulation dismissing this action on July 6, 2009.
Governmental and Regulatory Matters. Citigroup and certain of its affiliates are subject to formal and informal investigations, as well as subpoenas and/or requests for information, from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies to the marketing and management of the Falcon and ASTA/MAT funds. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully and are engaged in discussions on these matters.
IPO Securities Litigation
On June 10, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered an order preliminarily approving the proposed settlement of this matter and scheduling a hearing to determine whether the proposed settlement should be finally approved.
Wachovia/Wells Fargo Litigation
On July 13, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Section 126(c) of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 bars the enforcement of the Citigroup-Wachovia Exclusivity Agreement in connection with the Wachovia-Wells Fargo transaction. Citi plans to pursue further proceedings in this litigation, including an appeal of the court's ruling.
Other Matters
Lehman Brothers—Structured Notes. A public prosecutor in Greece has opened an investigation, while a public prosecutor in Belgium has served a writ of summons on a Citigroup subsidiary and three current and former employees.
W.R. Huff Asset Management Co., LLC v. Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., L.P. In August 1999, W. R. Huff Asset Management Co., LLC filed this lawsuit (the "KKR Case") on behalf of its clients who purchased 101/2% Senior Subordinated Notes issued in 1995 in connection with the leveraged recapitalization of Bruno's, Inc. The case was filed in Alabama state court against Robinson Humphrey Co. LLC, which served as financial advisor to Bruno's in connection with the leveraged recapitalization (and which later became a fully owned subsidiary of Salomon Smith Barney) and others. The KKR Case arises out of the same transaction at issue in 27001 PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. v. BT SECURITIES CORP., ET AL. (the "BT Securities Case"). The allegations and potential exposure in the KKR Case and BT Securities Case are similar, with plaintiffs seeking compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorneys' fees, costs and pre-judgment interest in an amount they allege to be between approximately $250 million and $750 million. After years of motion practice over jurisdictional issues, on April 29, 2009, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the District Court's order allowing Huff to amend its complaint to substitute the same 46 individual noteholders named as plaintiffs in the BT Securities Case as plaintiffs in the KKR Case, resulting in remand of the case to Alabama state court. Defendants' motion to strike the Fourth Amended Complaint and plaintiffs' motion to consolidate the BT Securities and KKR Cases are pending.future.
Settlement Payments
Any payments required by Citigroup or its affiliates in connection with the settlement agreements described above either have been made, or are covered by existing litigation reserves.
There are no material changes fromFor a discussion of the risk factors set forth underaffecting Citigroup, see "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our1A of Citi's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.2009.
Item 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Share Repurchases
Under its long-standing repurchase program, the CompanyCitigroup may buy back common shares in the market or otherwise from time to time. This program may beis used for many purposes, including to offsetoffsetting dilution from stock-based compensation programs.
The following table summarizes the Company'sCitigroup's share repurchases during the first six months of 2009:2010:
In millions, except per share amounts | Total shares purchased(1) | Average price paid per share | Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First quarter 2009 | |||||||||||
Open market repurchases(1) | 0.2 | $ | 3.03 | $ | 6,741 | ||||||
Employee transactions(2) | 10.7 | 3.56 | N/A | ||||||||
Total first quarter 2009 | 10.9 | $ | 3.55 | $ | 6,741 | ||||||
April 2009 | |||||||||||
Open market repurchases(1) | 0.1 | $ | 3.36 | $ | 6,740 | ||||||
Employee transactions(2) | 0.2 | 3.09 | N/A | ||||||||
May 2009 | |||||||||||
Open market repurchases(1) | — | $ | — | $ | 6,740 | ||||||
Employee transactions(2) | 0.1 | 3.61 | N/A | ||||||||
June 2009 | |||||||||||
Open market repurchases(1) | 0.1 | $ | 2.98 | $ | 6,740 | ||||||
Employee transactions(2) | 4.1 | 3.69 | N/A | ||||||||
Second quarter 2009 | |||||||||||
Open market repurchases(1) | 0.2 | $ | 3.27 | $ | 6,740 | ||||||
Employee transactions(2) | 4.4 | 3.67 | N/A | ||||||||
Total second quarter 2009 | 4.6 | $ | 3.65 | $ | 6,740 | ||||||
Year-to-date 2009 | |||||||||||
Open market repurchases(1) | 0.4 | $ | 3.16 | $ | 6,740 | ||||||
Employee transactions(2) | 15.1 | 3.59 | N/A | ||||||||
Total year-to-date 2009 | 15.5 | $ | 3.58 | $ | 6,740 | ||||||
In millions, except per share amounts | Total shares purchased(1) | Average price paid per share | Approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or programs | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
First quarter 2010 | |||||||||||
Open market repurchases(1) | — | $ | — | $ | 6,739 | ||||||
Employee transactions(2) | 12.5 | 3.57 | N/A | ||||||||
Total first quarter 2010 | 12.5 | $ | 3.57 | $ | 6,739 | ||||||
April 2010 | |||||||||||
Open market repurchases(1) | — | $ | — | $ | 6,739 | ||||||
Employee transactions(2) | 120.9 | 4.93 | N/A | ||||||||
May 2010 | |||||||||||
Open market repurchases(1) | — | $ | — | $ | 6,739 | ||||||
Employee transactions(2) | — | — | N/A | ||||||||
June 2010 | |||||||||||
Open market repurchases(1) | — | $ | — | $ | 6,739 | ||||||
Employee transactions(2) | 0.3 | 4.09 | N/A | ||||||||
Second quarter 2010 | |||||||||||
Open market repurchases(1) | — | $ | — | $ | 6,739 | ||||||
Employee transactions(2) | 121.2 | 4.93 | N/A | ||||||||
Total second quarter 2010 | 121.2 | $ | 4.93 | $ | 6,739 | ||||||
Year-to-date 2010 | |||||||||||
Open market repurchases(1) | — | $ | — | $ | 6,739 | ||||||
Employee transactions(2) | 133.7 | 4.80 | N/A | ||||||||
Total year-to-date 2010 | 133.7 | $ | 4.80 | $ | 6,739 | ||||||
N/A Not applicable.applicable
In accordance with the recent exchange agreements with the U.S. government, the Company agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $0.01 per share per quarter forFor so long as the USGU.S. government holds any debtCitigroup common stock or trust preferred securities, Citigroup has generally agreed not to acquire, repurchase or redeem any Citigroup equity security of Citigroup (or any affiliate thereof) acquired by the USG in connectionor trust preferred securities, other than pursuant to administrating its employee benefit plans or other customary exceptions, or with the public and private exchange offers, without the consent of the U.S. government. Any dividend on Citi's outstanding common stock would need to be made in compliance with Citi's obligations to any remaining outstanding preferred stock. In addition, pursuant to various of its agreements with the U.S. government, the Company agreed not to repurchase its common stock subject to certain limited exceptions, including in the ordinary course of business as part of employee benefit programs, without the consent of the U.S. government.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
For the results of Citigroup's Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 21, 2009, please refer to the information under Part II, Item 4 "Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders" in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009.
See Exhibit Index.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 7th6th day of August, 2009.2010.
CITIGROUP INC. (Registrant) | ||||
By | /s/ JOHN C. GERSPACH John C. Gerspach Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | |||
By | /s/ JEFFREY R. WALSH Jeffrey R. Walsh Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
2.01 | Amended and Restated Joint Venture Contribution and Formation Agreement, dated May 29, 2009, by and among Citigroup Inc. (the Company), Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 3, 2009 (File No. 1-9924). | ||
2.02 | Share Purchase Agreement, dated May 1, 2009, by and among Nikko Citi Holdings Inc., Nikko Cordial Securities Inc., Nikko Citi Business Services Inc., Nikko Citigroup Limited, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking | ||
Share Purchase Agreement, dated July 11, 2008, by and between Citigroup Global Markets Finance Corporation & Co. Beschrankt Haftende KG, CM Akquisitions GmbH, and Banque Federative du Credit Mutuel S.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.01 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 (File No. 1-9924). | |||
3.01 | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit | ||
3.02 | By-Laws of the Company, as amended, effective | ||
4.01 | Warrant, dated October 28, 2008, issued by the Company to the United States Department of the Treasury (the UST), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 30, 2008 (File No. 1-9924). | ||
4.02 | Warrant, dated December 31, 2008, issued by the Company to the UST, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 31, 2008 (File No. 1-9924). | ||
4.03 | Warrant, dated January 15, 2009, issued by the Company to the UST, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 16, 2009 (File No. 1-9924). | ||
4.04 | Tax Benefits Preservation Plan, dated June 9, 2009, between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., |
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 10, 2009 (File No. 1-9924). | |||
4.05 | Capital Securities Guarantee Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2009, between the Company, as Guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Guarantee Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.03 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 30, 2009 (File No. 1-9924). | ||
10.01 | |||
10.02 | Citigroup 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective April 20, 2010), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed April 22, 2010 (No. 333-166242). | ||
10.03 | Letter | ||
12.01 | + | Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges. | |
12.02 | + | Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges (including preferred stock dividends). | |
31.01 | + | Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.02 | + | Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.01 | + | Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101.01 | + | Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citigroup Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, | |
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial |
The total amount of securities authorized pursuant to any instrument defining rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company will furnish copies of any such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.