Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C.WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ýQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009

OR

o


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                             to                              

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010

Commission file number 1-9924

Citigroup Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 52-1568099
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

399 Park Avenue, New York, New YorkNY
(Address of principal executive offices)

 

10043
(Zip Code)code)

(212) 559-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:

Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
 Smaller reporting company o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No  ý

        Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:

Common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2009: 22,863,947,261July 31, 2010: 28,973,528,780

Available on the web at www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents


CITIGROUP INC.

THIRDSECOND QUARTER OF 2009—2010—FORM 10-Q

THE COMPANYOVERVIEW

 3
 

Citigroup Segments and RegionsCITIGROUP SEGMENTS AND REGIONS

 
4

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 
5

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

  

5
 

Management SummaryEXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 
75

Significant Events in the Third QuarterOverview of 2009Results

 
95

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


8

SEGMENT, BUSINESS AND PRODUCT PRODUCT—INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES

 
1210
 

Citigroup Income (Loss)

 
1210
 

Citigroup Revenues

 
1311

CITICORP

 
1412

Regional Consumer Banking

 
1513
 

North America Regional Consumer Banking

 
1614
 

EMEA Regional Consumer Banking

 
1816
 

Latin America Regional Consumer Banking

 
1918
 

Asia Regional Consumer Banking

 
20

Institutional Clients Group (ICG)

 
2122
 

Securities and Banking

 
2223
 

Transaction Services

 
2425

CITI HOLDINGS

 
2526
 

Brokerage and Asset Management

 
2627
 

Local Consumer Lending

 
2728
 

Special Asset Pool

 
2930

CORPORATE/OTHER

 
3233

GOVERNMENT PROGRAMSSEGMENT BALANCE SHEET

 
3334

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY


35

Capital Resources


35

Funding and Liquidity


40

OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS


43

MANAGING GLOBAL RISK

 
3644

LOAN AND CREDIT DETAILSCredit Risk

 
3644

Loan and Credit Overview


44
 

Loans Outstanding

 
3645
 

Details of Credit Loss Experience

 
4050
 

Non-Accrual Assets

 
4151
 

Consumer Loan Details

 
4356

Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts and Ratios


56

Consumer Loan Net Credit Losses and Ratios


57
  

Consumer Loan Modification Programs

 
4458
  

U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending

 
4562

Corporate Credit Portfolio


71
  

N.A. CardsMarket Risk

 
5074
  

U.S. InstallmentAverage Rates—Interest Revenue, Interest Expense, and Other Revolving LoansNet Interest Margin

 
5376
 

Corporate Loan Details

 
54

U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposure in Citi Holdings—Special Asset Pool


57

Exposure to Commercial Real Estate


58

Direct Exposure to Monolines


59

Highly Leveraged Financing Transactions


60

DERIVATIVES


60

Market Risk Management Process


64

Operational Risk Management Process


66

Country and Cross-Border Risk


67

INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS


68
 

Average Balances and Interest Rates—Assets

 
6977
 

Average Balances and Interest Rates—Liabilities and Equity, and Net Interest Revenue

 
7078
 

Analysis of Changes in Interest Revenue

 
7381
 

Analysis of Changes in Interest Expense and Net Interest Revenue

 
7482

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY


76
 

Capital ResourcesCross-Border Risk

 
76

Common Equity


78

Funding and Liquidity


81

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 
84

DERIVATIVES


85

INCOME TAXES


87

RECLASSIFICATION OF HELD-TO-MATURITY (HTM) SECURITIES TO AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE (AFS)


88

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

 
85

FAIR VALUATION

 
8588

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 
8588

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 
8589

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES

 
8690

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
8792

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
93101

OTHER INFORMATION

 
195
 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 
195197
 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 
198199
 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 
199

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

 
200
 

Item 6. Exhibits

 
201
 

Signatures

 
202
 

Exhibit Index

 
203

Table of Contents


THE COMPANYOVERVIEW

Introduction

        Citigroup's history dates back to the founding of Citibank in 1812. Citigroup's original corporate predecessor was incorporated in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware. Following a series of transactions over a number of years, Citigroup Inc. (Citigroupwas formed in 1998 upon the merger of Citicorp and together with its subsidiaries, the Company, Citi or Citigroup)Travelers Group Inc.

        Citigroup is a global diversified financial services holding company whose businesses provide consumers, corporations, governments and institutions with a broad range of financial services to consumerproducts and corporate customers. Citigroupservices. Citi has approximately 200 million customer accounts and does business in more than 140 countries.160 countries and jurisidictions.

        Citigroup was incorporated in 1988 under the lawscurrently operates, for management reporting purposes, via two primary business segments: Citicorp, consisting of ourRegional Consumer Banking businesses andInstitutional Clients Group; and Citi Holdings, consisting of ourBrokerage and Asset Management andLocal Consumer Lending businesses, and aSpecial Asset Pool. There is also a third segment,Corporate/Other. For a further description of the State of Delaware.

        The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 registered with, and subject to examination by, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB). Citibank, N.A. is a U.S. national bank subject to supervision and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)business segments and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Someproducts and services they provide, see "Citigroup Segments" below, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Note 3 to the Company's other subsidiaries are also subjectConsolidated Financial Statements.

        Throughout this report, "Citigroup" and "Citi" refer to supervisionCitigroup Inc. and examination by their respective federal and state authorities or, in the case of overseas subsidiaries, the regulators of the respective jurisdictions.its consolidated subsidiaries.

        This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Citigroup's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (20082009 (2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K), Citigroup's updated 20082009 historical financial statements and notes filed on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on October 13, 2009June 25, 2010 and Citigroup's Quarterly ReportsReport on Form 10-Q for the quartersquarter ended June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009. Additional financial, statistical, and business-related information for the third quarter of 2009, as well as business and segment trends, are included in a Financial Supplement that was furnished as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 15, 2009.

        The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 399 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10043, telephone number 212 559 1000.2010. Additional information about Citigroup is available on the Company's webcompany's Web site atwww.citigroup.com. Citigroup's recent annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, as well as the Company'sits other filings with the SEC are available free of charge through the Company's webcompany's Web site by clicking on the "Investors" page and selecting "All SEC Filings." The SEC webSEC's Web site also contains periodic and current reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding the CompanyCiti, atwww.sec.gov.

        Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods' financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation.

        Within this Form 10-Q, please refer to the tables of contents on pages 2 and 126 for page references to Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively.

Impact of Adoption of SFAS 166/167

        Effective January 1, 2010, Citigroup adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 860, Transfers and Servicing, formerly SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166), and ASC 810, Consolidations, formerly SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167). Among other requirements, the adoption of these standards includes the requirement that Citi consolidate certain of its credit card securitization trusts and eliminate sale accounting for transfers of credit card receivables to those trusts. As a result, reported and managed-basis presentations are comparable for periods beginning January 1, 2010. For comparison purposes, prior period revenues, net credit losses, provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims and loans are presented on a managed basis in this Form 10-Q. Managed presentations were applicable only to Citi's North American branded and retail partner credit card operations inNorth America Regional Consumer Banking and Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending and any aggregations in which they are included. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Executive Summary," "Capital Resources and Liquidity" and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for an additional discussion of the adoption of SFAS 166/167 and its impact on Citigroup.


Table of Contents

As described above, Citigroup is managed alongpursuant to the following segment and product lines:segments:

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

        The following are the four regions in which Citigroup operates. The regional results are fully reflected in the segment results.results above.

GRAPHICGRAPHIC


(1)
Asia includes Japan,Latin America includes Mexico, andNorth America includescomprises the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico.

Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

SECOND QUARTER 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Overview of Results

        During the second quarter of 2010, Citigroup continued its focus on (i) building and maintaining its financial strength, including maintaining its capital, liquidity and continued expense discipline, (ii) winding down Citi Holdings as quickly as practicable in an economically rational manner, and (iii) its core assets and businesses in Citicorp.

        For the quarter, Citigroup reported net income of $2.7 billion, or $0.09 per diluted share. Second quarter 2010 results were down from the prior-year level of $4.3 billion, primarily due to the second quarter 2009 $6.7 billion after-tax ($11.1 billion pre-tax) gain on the sale of Smith Barney (SB) to the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture (MSSB JV). In addition, second quarter 2010 results reflected a difficult capital markets environment inSecurities and Banking and the impact of the U.K. bonus tax of approximately $400 million, partially offset by a stabilizing to improving credit environment and growth inAsia andLatin America Regional Consumer Banking andTransaction Services. Citicorp's net income was $3.8 billion; Citi Holdings had a net loss of $1.2 billion.

        Revenues of $22.1 billion decreased 33% from comparable year-ago levels primarily due to the 2009 gain on sale of SB.Brokerage and Asset Management, which reflected the absence of SB revenues in the current quarter (approximately $0.9 billion in the second quarter of 2009),Local Consumer Lending andSecurities and Banking also contributed to the decline in comparable revenues. Other core businesses showed continued strength, includingRegional Consumer Banking andTransaction Services with $8.0 billion and $2.5 billion in revenue, respectively.

Securities and Banking, which faced a challenging market environment during the second quarter of 2010, had revenues of $6.0 billion, a $0.7 billion decrease from the prior-year period. Lower fixed income and equity markets revenues reflected increasing investor uncertainty and volatility during the quarter, which reduced market-making opportunities. Fixed income markets revenues were $3.7 billion compared to $5.6 billion in the second quarter of 2009. Equity markets revenues were $652 million, compared to $1.1 billion in the prior-year quarter. Investment banking revenues declined 42% to $674 million, reflecting lower client market activities. Lending revenues were $522 million in the second quarter of 2010, compared with losses of $1.1 billion in the second quarter of 2009, primarily due to gains on credit default swap hedges, compared to losses in the prior-year quarter.

Regional Consumer Banking revenues were up $187 million from the prior-year quarter to $8.0 billion on a comparable basis, driven by growth in Asia and Latin America.

Transaction Services revenues were up from year-ago levels by 1%, to $2.5 billion, also driven by Asia and Latin America.

Local Consumer Lending revenues of $4.2 billion in the second quarter of 2010 were down 15% on a comparable basis from a year ago, driven by the addition of $347 million of mortgage repurchase reserves related to North America residential real estate, lower volumes, and the deconsolidation of Primerica, Inc. (Primerica) from Citigroup, which completed its initial public offering and other equity transactions during the quarter.

        Revenues in theSpecial Asset Pool increased to $572 million in the second quarter of 2010, from negative $376 million in the prior year, largely driven by positive net revenue marks of $1.0 billion in the second quarter of 2010 versus $470 million in the same quarter of 2009. The growth in revenues was also driven by the absence of losses related to hedges of various asset positions recorded in the prior-year period.

Net interest revenue increased 9% from the second quarter of 2009, primarily driven by the impact from the adoption of SFAS 166/167. Sequentially, Citi's net interest margin of 3.15% decreased by 17 basis points from the first quarter of 2010 due to the continued de-risking of loan portfolios, the expansion of loss mitigation efforts and the Primerica divestiture.

Non-interest revenue decreased 53% from a year ago, primarily reflecting the gain on sale of SB in 2009.

Operating expenses decreased 1% from the year-ago quarter and were up 3% from the first quarter of 2010. The decline in expenses from the year-ago quarter reflected the decrease in Citi Holdings expenses, primarily related to the absence of SB (approximately $900 million in the second quarter of 2009), which more than offset the increase in Citicorp expenses resulting from continued investments in the Citicorp businesses and the U.K. bonus tax in the current quarter. The increase in expenses from the first quarter of 2010 primarily related to the U.K. bonus tax, as ongoing investments in Citicorp businesses were partially offset by a continued decline in Citi Holdings expenses. Citi's full-time employees were 259,000 at June 30, 2010, down 20,000 from June 30, 2009 and down 4,000 from March 31, 2010.

Net credit losses of $8.0 billion in the second quarter of 2010 were down 31% from year-ago levels on a comparable basis, and down 5% from the first quarter of 2010. Second quarter of 2010 net credit losses reflected improvement for the fourth consecutive quarter. Consumer net credit losses of $7.5 billion were down 23% on a comparable basis from last year and down 7% from the prior quarter. Corporate net credit losses of $472 million were down 73% from last year and up 30% from the prior quarter. The sequential increase in corporate net credit losses was principally due to the charge off of loans for which Citi had previously established specific FAS 114 reserves that were released during the second quarter upon recognition of the charge off.

        Citi's total allowance for loan losses was $46.2 billion at June 30, 2010, or 6.7% of total loans. This was down from 6.8% of total loans at March 31, 2010. During the second quarter of 2010, Citi had a net release of $1.5 billion to its credit reserves and allowance for unfunded lending


Table of Contents

commitments, compared to a net build of $4.0 billion in the second quarter of 2009 and a net release of $53 million in the first quarter of 2010. Approximately half of the net loan loss reserve release was related to consumer loans, and half related to corporate loans (principally specific reserves).

        The total allowance for loan losses for consumer loans decreased to $39.6 billion at the end of the quarter, but increased as a percentage of total consumer loans to 7.87%, compared to 7.84% at the end of the first quarter of 2010. The decrease in the allowance was mainly due to a net release of $827 million and reductions that did not flow through the provision. The reductions originated from asset sales in the U.S. real estate lending portfolio and certain loan portfolios moving to held-for-sale. The net release was mainly driven by Retail Partner Cards in Citi Holdings, as well asLatin America andAsia Regional Consumer Banking in Citicorp. During the second quarter of 2010, early- and later-stage delinquencies improved across most of the consumer loan portfolios, driven by improvement in North America mortgages, both in first and second mortgages. The improvement in first mortgages was entirely driven by asset sales and loans moving from the trial period under the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to permanent modification. For total consumer loans, the 90 days or more consumer loan delinquency rate was 3.67% at June 30, 2010, compared to 4.01% at March 31, 2010 and 3.68% a year ago. The 30 to 89 days past due consumer loan delinquency rate was 3.06% at June 30, 2010, compared to 3.19% at March 31, 2010 and 3.41% a year ago. Consumer non-accrual loans totaled $13.8 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $15.6 billion at March 31, 2010 and $15.8 billion at June 30, 2009.

        The total allowance for loan losses for funded corporate loans declined to $6.6 billion at June 30, 2010, or 3.59% of corporate loans, down from 3.90% in the first quarter of 2010. Corporate non-accrual loans were $11.0 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $12.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $12.5 billion a year ago. The decrease in non-accrual loans from the prior quarter was mainly due to loan sales, write-offs and paydowns, which were partially offset by increases due to the weakening of certain borrowers.

        The effective tax rate on continuing operations for the second quarter of 2010 was 23%, reflecting taxable earnings in lower tax rate jurisdictions, as well as tax advantaged earnings.

Total deposits were $814 billion at June 30, 2010, down 2% from March 31, 2010 and up 1% from year-ago levels. Citi's structural liquidity (equity, long-term debt and deposits) as a percentage of assets was 71% at June 30, 2010, unchanged as compared with March 31, 2010 and compared with 71% at June 30, 2009.

Total assets decreased $65 billion from the end of the first quarter 2010 to $1,938 billion. Citi Holdings assets decreased $38 billion during the second quarter of 2010, driven by approximately $19 billion of asset sales and business dispositions (including $6 billion from the Primerica initial public offering and $4 billion from the liquidation of subprime CDOs), $15 billion of net run-off and pay-downs and $4 billion of net credit losses and net asset marks. In addition, as part of its continued focus on reducing the assets in Citi Holdings, Citi reclassified $11.4 billion in assets from held-to-maturity to available-for-sale at June 30, 2010. This reclassification was in response to recent changes to SFAS 133 that allowed a one-time movement of certain assets classified as held-to-maturity or available-for-sale to the trading book as of July 1, 2010, and included $4.1 billion of auction rate securities that were in held-to-maturity. The remaining $7.3 billion consisted of securities in theSpecial Asset Pool for which prices have largely recovered and that Citi believes it should be able to sell over the short-to-medium term, rather than wait for them to mature or run-off. Citi Holdings total GAAP assets of $465 billion at June 30, 2010 represents 24% of Citi's total GAAP assets. Citi Holdings' risk-weighted assets were approximately $400 billion, or approximately 40% of Citi's risk-weighted assets, as of June 30, 2010.

        Citi's exposure to the ABCP CDO super senior positions was also reduced to zero during the second quarter of 2010 (although theSpecial Asset Pool retains exposure to a very small amount of underlying collateral assets). All of the 17 ABCP CDO deals structured by Citi have been liquidated as of the end of the second quarter.

        Citigroup'sTotal stockholders' equity increased by $3.4 billion during the second quarter of 2010 to $154.8 billion, primarily reflecting net income during the quarter, partially offset by a decline inAccumulated other comprehensive income largely from FX translation. Citigroup's total equity capital base and trust preferred securities were $175.0 billion at June 30, 2010. Citigroup maintained its "well-capitalized" position with a Tier 1 Capital Ratio of 11.99% at June 30, 2010, up from 11.28% at March 31, 2010.

Business Outlook

        As was the case with the second quarter of 2010 results inSecurities and Banking, the global economic and capital markets environment are expected to continue to drive Citi's revenue levels in the third quarter. In addition, as previously disclosed, The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act) will continue to have a negative impact on U.S. credit card revenues. Citi continues to believe that, for the full year 2010, the negative net impact of the CARD Act on Citi-branded card revenues will be approximately $400 million to $600 million, including the impact of the Federal Reserve Board's recent adoption of final rules relating to penalty fee provisions. For Retail Partner Cards, Citi has increased its full year 2010 estimate of negative net revenue impact resulting from the CARD Act to approximately $150 million to $200 million, from $50 million to $150 million, given the new penalty fee provisions. In each of these portfolios, the vast majority of the 2010 net impact will occur in the second half of the year.

        Net revenue marks in theSpecial Asset Pool, which have been positive for the last five quarters, will remain episodic, although Citi continued to de-risk this portfolio during the second quarter of 2010, as evidenced by the CDO liquidations discussed above.

        Citi currently expects quarterly expenses to continue to be in the range of $11.5 billion to $12 billion for the remainder of 2010. As previously disclosed, Citicorp's expenses may continue to increase, reflecting ongoing investments in its core businesses, while Citi Holdings should continue to decline as assets are reduced.

        Credit costs will remain a key driver of earnings performance for the remainder of 2010. Assuming that the


Table of Contents

U.S. economy continues to recover and international recovery is sustained, Citi currently believes that consumer credit costs should continue to decline. Internationally, credit is expected to continue to improve, but at a moderating pace. In both North America cards portfolios, net credit losses are expected to improve modestly, but will likely remain elevated until U.S. employment levels improve significantly. In North America mortgages, net credit losses and delinquencies continued to improve during the second quarter of 2010, largely as the result of Citi's loss mitigation efforts, including sales of delinquent mortgages and the impact of loan modifications. Citi has observed, however, that, to date, the underlying credit quality of this portfolio has not been improving in the same manner as its cards portfolios. Mortgages are also particularly at risk to many external factors, such as unemployment trends, home prices, government modification programs and state foreclosure regulations. As a result, Citi expects to continue to pay particular attention to this portfolio and will continue its efforts to mitigate losses. Citigroup's consumer loan loss reserve balances will continue to reflect the losses embedded in the company's portfolios, given underlying credit trends and the impact of forbearance programs. Though credit trends in the corporate loan portfolio generally continued to improve, credit costs will continue to be episodic.

        Looking forward, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act was signed into law on July 21, 2010. The Act calls for significant structural reforms and new substantive regulation across the financial industry, including new consumer protections and increased scrutiny and regulation for any financial institution that could pose a systemic risk to market-wide financial stability. Many of the provisions of the Act will be subject to extensive rulemaking and interpretation, and a significant amount of uncertainty remains as to the ultimate impact of the Act on Citigroup. The Act will likely require Citigroup to eliminate, transform or change certain of its business activities and practices. The Financial Reform Act will also likely impose additional costs, some significant, on Citigroup, adversely affect its ability to pursue business opportunities it may otherwise consider engaging in, cause business disruptions and impact the value of the assets that Citigroup holds. In addition, the Act grants new regulatory authority to various U.S. federal regulators to impose heightened prudential standards on financial institutions. This authority, together with the continued implementation of new minimum capital standards for bank holding companies as adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and U.S. regulators, has created significant uncertainty with respect to the future capital requirements or capital composition for institutions such as Citigroup. Citi will continue to monitor these developments closely.


Table of Contents

CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—Page 1



  
  
  
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  
 


 Third Quarter  
  
 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months Ended  
 
In millions of dollars,
except per share amounts
In millions of dollars,
except per share amounts
 %
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
In millions of dollars,
except per share amounts
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
2009 2008 %
Change
 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Total managed revenues(1)

Total managed revenues(1)

 $22,071 $33,095 (33)%$47,492 $60,068 (21)%

Total managed net credit losses(1)

Total managed net credit losses(1)

 7,962 11,470 (31) 16,346 21,300 (23)

Net interest revenue

Net interest revenue

 $11,998 $13,404 (10)%$37,753 $40,478 (7)%

Net interest revenue

 $14,039 $12,829 9%$28,600 $25,755 11%

Non-interest revenue

Non-interest revenue

 8,392 2,854 NM 37,127 5,475 NM 

Non-interest revenue

 8,032 17,140 (53) 18,892 28,735 (34)
                           

Revenues, net of interest expense

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $20,390 $16,258 25%$74,880 $45,953 63%

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $22,071 $29,969 (26)%$47,492 $54,490 (13)%

Operating expenses

Operating expenses

 11,824 14,007 (16) 35,508 44,598 (20)

Operating expenses

 11,866 11,999 (1) 23,384 23,684 (1)

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 9,095 9,067  32,078 22,019 46 

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 6,665 12,676 (47) 15,283 22,983 (34)
                           

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

 $(529)$(6,816) 92 $7,294 $(20,664) NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

 (1,122) (3,295) 66 620 (9,628) NM 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 $3,540 $5,294 (33)%$8,825 $7,823 13%

Income taxes (losses)

Income taxes (losses)

 812 907 (10) 1,848 1,742 6 
                           

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

 $593 $(3,521) NM $6,674 $(11,036) NM 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of taxes

 (418) 613 NM (677) 578 NM 

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 $2,728 $4,387 (38)%$6,977 $6,081 15%

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 (3) (142) 98 208 (259) NM 
                           

Net Income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

 $175 $(2,908) NM $5,997 $(10,458) NM 

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

 74 (93) NM 24 (37) NM 

Net income (losses) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

Net income (losses) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $2,725 $4,245 (36)%$7,185 $5,822 23%

Net income (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 28 (34) NM 60 (50) NM 
                           

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $101 $(2,815) NM $5,973 $(10,421) NM 

Citigroup's net income

Citigroup's net income

 $2,697 $4,279 (37)%$7,125 $5,872 21%
                           

Less:

Less:

 

Less:

 

Preferred dividends—Basic

 $(272)$(389) 30%$(2,988)$(833) NM 

Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance—Basic(1)

    (1,285)  NM 

Preferred dividends—Basic

  $1,495 (100)%  $2,716 (100)%

Preferred stock Series H discount accretion—Basic

 (16)  NM (123)  NM 

Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance—Basic(2)

     1,285 (100)

Impact of the Public and Private Preferred stock exchange offer

 (3,055)  NM (3,055)  NM 

Preferred stock Series H discount accretion—Basic

  54 (100)  107 (100)
                           

Income (loss) available to common stockholders

Income (loss) available to common stockholders

 (3,242) (3,204) (1) (1,478) (11,254) 87 

Income (loss) available to common stockholders

 $2,697 $2,730 (1)%$7,125 $1,764 NM 

Allocation of dividends to common stock and participating securities, net of forfeitures

  (1,738) NM (63) (5,151) 99 

Dividends and earnings allocated to participating securities, net of forfeitures

 26 105 (75) 57 69 (17)%
                           

Undistributed earnings (loss) for basic EPS

Undistributed earnings (loss) for basic EPS

 $(3,242)$(4,942) 34%$(1,541)$(16,405) 91%

Undistributed earnings (loss) for basic EPS

 $2,671 $2,625 2% $7,068 $1,695 NM 

Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends

Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends

  270 NM 540 606 (11)

Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends

  270 (100)  540 (100)%
                           

Undistributed earnings (loss) for diluted EPS

Undistributed earnings (loss) for diluted EPS

 $(3,242)$(4,672) 31%$(1,001)$(15,799) 94%

Undistributed earnings (loss) for diluted EPS

 $2,671 $2,895 (8)%$7,068 $2,235 NM 
                           

Earnings per share

Earnings per share

 

Earnings per share

 

Basic(2)

 

Basic(3)

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(0.23)$(0.72) 68%$(0.10)$(2.28) 96%

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $0.09 $0.51 (82)%$0.24 $0.36 (33)%

Net income (loss)

 (0.27) (0.61) 56 (0.19) (2.17) 91 

Net income (loss)

 0.09 0.49 (82) 0.25 0.31 (19)
                           

Diluted(2)

 

Diluted(3)

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(0.23)$(0.72) 68%$(0.10)$(2.28) 96%

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $0.09 $0.51 (82)%$0.23 $0.36 (36)%

Net income (loss)

 (0.27) (0.61) 56 (0.19) (2.17) 91 

Net income (loss)

 0.09 0.49 (82) 0.24 0.31 (23)
                           

[Continued on the following page, including notes to table.]


Table of Contents

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—Page 2


  
  
  
 Nine Months Ended
September 2009,
  
  Second Quarter  
 Six Months Ended  
 

 Third Quarter  
  
 

 %
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 2009,
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 %
Change
 2009

At September 30:

 
In millions of dollars,
except per share amounts
 Second Quarter %
Change
 Six Months Ended %
Change
 
 

At June 30:

 

Total assets

 $1,888,599 $2,050,131 (8)%        $1,937,656 $1,848,533 5%       

Total deposits

 832,603 780,343 7        813,951 804,736 1       

Long-term debt

 379,557 393,097 (3)        413,297 348,046 19       

Mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary Trusts (included in Long-term debt)

 34,531 23,836 45        20,218 24,196 (16)       

Common stockholders' equity

 140,530 98,638 42        154,494 78,001 98       

Total stockholders' equity

 140,842 126,062 12        154,806 152,302 2       

Direct staff(in thousands)

 276 352 (22)        259 279 (7)       
                          

Ratios:

  

Return on common stockholders' equity(3)

 (12.2)% (12.2)%   (2.3)% (13.8)%    7.0% 14.8%   9.5% 4.9%   
                          

Tier 1 Common(4)

 9.12% 3.72%          9.71% 2.75%         

Tier 1 Capital

 12.76% 8.19%          11.99 12.74         

Total Capital

 16.58% 11.68%          15.59 16.62         

Leverage(5)

 6.87% 4.70%          6.31 6.90         
                          

Common stockholders' equity to assets

 7.4% 4.8%          7.97% 4.22%         

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends

 0.96 NM   1.16 NM    1.54 1.41   1.68 1.23   
                          

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)
For the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009, Income available to common stockholders includes a reduction of $1.285 billion related to a conversion price reset pursuant to Citigroup's prior agreement with the purchasers of $12.5 billion of convertible preferred stock issued in a private offering in January 2008. The conversion price was reset from $31.62 per share to $26.35 per share. There was no impact to net income, total stockholders' equity or capital ratios due to the reset. However, the reset resulted in a reclassification from Retained earnings to Additional paid-in capital of $1.285 billion and a reduction in Income available to common stockholders of $1.285 billion. The 2009 third quarter Income available to common stockholders includes a reduction of $3.055 billion related to the preferred stock exchanged for common stock and trust preferred securities as part of the exchange offers.

(2)
The Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 260-10-45 to 65, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities" on January 1, 2009. All prior periods have been restated to conform to the current presentation. The Diluted EPS calculation for the third quarter and nine months of 2009 and 2008 utilize Basic shares and Income available to common stockholders (Basic) due to the negative Income available to common stockholders. Using actual Diluted shares and Income available to common stockholders (Diluted) would result in anti-dilution.

(3)
The return on average common stockholders' equity is calculated using income (loss) available to common stockholders.

(4)
As defined by the banking regulators, the Tier 1 Common ratio represents Tier 1 Capital less qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts divided by risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 Common ratio is a non-GAAP financial measure. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below for additional information on this measure.

(5)
The Leverage ratio represents Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average total assets.

NM
Not meaningful

        Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods' financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation.

        Within this Form 10-Q, please refer to the indices on pages 2 and 86 for page references to the Management's Discussion and Analysis section and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively.


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THIRD QUARTER OF 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY

        Citigroup reported net income of $101 million, and a loss of ($0.27) per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2009. The ($0.27) loss per share reflected a $3.1 billion charge to retained earnings related to the closing of the exchange offers, the remaining preferred stock dividends required to be paid prior to the closing of the exchange offers and the remaining quarterly accretion of the Series H preferred stock discount.

Revenues of $20.4 billion increased 25% from year-ago levels due primarily to positive revenue marks and gains in Citi Holdings relative to the prior-year period, and a $1.4 billion gain from the extinguishment of debt associated with the closing of the exchange offers. The increase was partially offset by credit valuation adjustments (CVA) of $1.7 billion in Securities and Banking, the absence of Smith Barney revenues of $2.0 billion in the third quarter of 2009 and foreign currency translation.

Net interest revenue declined 10% from the 2008 third quarter, primarily reflecting the Company's smaller balance sheet. Net interest margin in the third quarter of 2009 was 2.95%, down 20 basis points from the third quarter of 2008, reflecting a decrease in asset yields related to the decrease in the Federal funds rate, largely offset by significantly lower funding costs.Non-interest revenue increased $5.5 billion from a year ago, primarily reflecting the absence of significant losses in the Citi Holdings Special Asset Pool portfolio.

        Operating expenses decreased 16% from the year-ago quarter and were down 1% from the second quarter of 2009 primarily due to divestitures, including Smith Barney, the re-sizing of the Citi Holdings businesses, the re-engineering of Citicorp processes, expense control, and the impact of foreign currency translation. Headcount of 276,000 was down 76,000 from September 30, 2008 and down 3,000 from June 30, 2009.

        The Company's total allowance for loan losses totaled $36.4 billion at September 30, 2009, a coverage ratio of 5.85% of total loans up from 5.6% at June 30, 2009, even though corporate loans declined by $13 billion during the quarter and consumer loans decreased by $6 billion. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a net build of $802 million to its credit reserves. The build for the quarter was $3.1 billion lower than the second quarter of 2009, consisting of a net build of $893 million for consumer loans and a net release of $91 million for corporate loans.

        Consumer non-accrual loans totaled $17.9 billion at September 30, 2009, compared to $15.8 billion at June 30, 2009 and $10.8 billion at September 30, 2008, primarily related to the recognition of SFAS 114 charge-offs in the quarter. The consumer loan delinquency rate was 4.70% at September 30, 2009, compared to 4.24% at June 30, 2009 and 2.66% a year ago. Delinquencies continue to rise for the first mortgage portfolio in the U.S. due primarily to the lengthening of the foreclosure process by many states and the increasing impact of the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). Loans in the HAMP trial modification period are reported as delinquent if the original contractual payments are not received on time (even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower) until the loan has completed the trial period under the program (see "Loan and Credit Details—Consumer Loan Modification Programs" and "—U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending" below).

        Corporate non-accrual loans were $14.8 billion at September 30, 2009, compared to $12.4 billion at June 30, 2009 and $2.7 billion a year ago. The increase from the prior quarter is mainly due to the Company's continued policy of actively moving loans into non-accrual at earlier stages of anticipated distress. Over two-thirds of the non-accrual corporate loans are current and continue to make their contractual payments. The increase from prior-year levels is also attributable to the transfer of non-accrual loans from the held-for-sale portfolio (which are carried at lower-of-cost-or-fair value and excluded from non-accrual loans) to the held-for-investment portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2008. The total allowance for loan loss reserve balance for funded corporate loans remained stable at $8 billion at the end of the quarter, or 4.4% of corporate loans, up from 4.1% in the second quarter of 2009.

        The Company's effective tax rate on continuing operations in the third quarter of 2009 was 212% versus 48% in the prior-year period. The tax provision reflected a higher proportion of income earned and indefinitely reinvested in countries with relatively lower tax rates as well as a higher proportion of income from tax advantaged sources. The current quarter also includes a tax benefit of $103 million in continuing operations relating to a release of tax reserves on interchange fees, which was supported by a favorable Tax Court decision in a case litigated by another financial institution.

        Total deposits were $833 billion at September 30, 2009, up 3% from June 30, 2009 and up 7% from year-ago levels. At September 30, 2009, the Company had increased its structural liquidity (equity, long-term debt and deposits) as a percentage of assets from 66% at December 31, 2008 to 72% at September 30, 2009. Over the past six months, Citigroup and its subsidiaries have issued $20 billion of non-guaranteed debt outside of the FDIC's TLGP.

        Citigroup has continued its deleveraging, reducing total assets from $2,050 billion a year ago to $1,889 billion at September 30, 2009. Asset reductions in Citi Holdings made up approximately 98% of the decline, reflecting the Company's continued strategy of reducing its assets and exposures in this business segment, which are down by almost one-third since the peak levels of early 2008.

        Primarily as a result of the exchange offers, Citigroup increased its Tier 1 Common by $63 billion from the second quarter of 2009 to $90 billion. In addition, the Company's Tangible Common Equity (TCE) increased by $62 billion from the second quarter of 2009 to $102 billion at September 30, 2009. (TCE and Tier 1 Common are non-GAAP financial


Table of Contents

measures. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" for additional information on these measures.)

        The closing of the exchange offers also resulted in a reconstitution of the Company's equity base. Common Equity increased 98% from December 31, 2008 to $140.5 billion. Citigroup's total stockholders' equity decreased by $11.5 billion during the third quarter of 2009 to $140.8 billion, primarily reflecting the impact of the exchange offers, partially offset by a $4.0 billion improvement inAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income. Citigroup's total equity capital base and trust preferred securities were $175.4 billion at September 30, 2009. The Tier 1 Capital ratio and Tier 1 Common ratio were 12.76% and 9.12%, respectively, at September 30, 2009.


Table of Contents


SIGNIFICANT EVENTS IN THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2009

        Certain significant events have occurred during the fiscal year to date, including events subsequent to September 30, 2009, that had, or could have, an effect on Citigroup's current and future financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. These events are summarized below and discussed throughout this MD&A.

EXCHANGE OFFERS

Private Exchange Offers

        On July 23, 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with the private holders of $12.5 billion aggregate liquidation value of preferred stock. The U.S. Treasury (UST) matched these exchange offers by exchanging $12.5 billion aggregate liquidation value of its preferred stock, for a total closing of $25 billion. Following the approval, on September 2, 2009, by Citi shareholders of an increase in Citi's authorized common stock, on September 10, 2009, the private holders and the UST received an aggregate of approximately 7,692 million shares of Citigroup common stock.

Public Exchange Offers

        On July 29, 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with the holders of approximately $20.4 billion in aggregate liquidation value of publicly-held preferred stock and trust preferred securities, representing 99% of the total liquidation value of securities Citigroup was offering to exchange. Upon closing of the public exchange offers, Citi issued approximately 5.8 billion shares of common stock to the public exchange offer participants.

        In addition, on July 30, 2009, the UST matched the public exchange offers by exchanging an additional $12.5 billion aggregate liquidation value of its preferred stock. Following the increase in Citigroup's authorized common stock, on September 10, 2009, the UST received an additional approximately 3.8 billion shares of Citigroup common stock.

        In total, approximately $58 billion in aggregate liquidation value of preferred stock and trust preferred securities were exchanged for common stock upon completion of all stages of the exchange offers. As a result of the exchange offers, the UST owned approximately 33.6% of Citigroup's outstanding common stock, not including the exercise of the warrants issued to the UST as part of TARP and pursuant to the loss-sharing agreement. See "Government Programs" below.

Trust Preferred Securities

        On July 30, 2009, all remaining preferred stock of Citigroup held by the UST and the FDIC that was not exchanged into Citigroup common stock in connection with the exchange offers, in an aggregate liquidation amount of approximately $27.1 billion, was exchanged into newly issued 8% trust preferred securities.

Accounting Impact

        The accounting for the exchange offers resulted in the de-recognition of preferred stock and the recognition of the common stock issued at fair value in theCommon stock andAdditional paid-in capital accounts in equity. The difference between the carrying amount of preferred stock and the fair value of the common stock was recorded inRetained earnings (impacting net income available to common shareholders and EPS) orAdditional paid-in capital accounts in equity, depending on whether the preferred stock was originally non-convertible or convertible.

        For the U.S. Government (USG) preferred stock that was converted to 8% trust preferred securities, the newly issued trust preferred securities were initially recorded at fair value asLong-term debt. The difference between the carrying amount of the preferred stock and the fair value of the trust preferred securities was recorded inRetained earnings after adjusting for the appropriate deferred tax liability (impacting net income available to common shareholders and EPS). For trust preferred securities exchanged for common stock, the carrying amount recorded as long-term debt was de-recognized and the common stock issued was recorded at fair value in theCommon Stock and theAdditional Paid-in Capital accounts in equity. The difference between the carrying amount of the trust preferred securities and the fair value of the common stock was recorded in Other revenue in the third quarter of 2009.


Table of Contents

        The following table presents the impact of the completion of all stages of the exchange offers to Citigroup's common shares outstanding and to its balance sheet:

(in millions of dollars, except incremental number of Citigroup common shares)
 Impact on 
Security Notional
Amounts
 Converted
Into
 Incremental
Number of
Citigroup
Common
Shares
 Date of
Settlement
 Other
Assets(3)
 Long-
Term
Debt
 Preferred
Stock
 Common
Stock
 Additional
Paid In
Capital
 Income
Statement(2)
 Retained
Earnings(1)
 
 
  
  
 (in millions)
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 

Convertible Preferred Stock held by Private Investors

 $12,500 Common Stock  3,846  7/23/2009 $   $(12,500)$38 $21,801 $ $(9,340)

Convertible Preferred Stock held by Public Investors

  3,146 Common Stock  823  7/29/2009      (3,146) 8  5,128    (1,990)

Non-Convertible Preferred Stock held by Public Investors

  11,465 Common Stock  3,351  7/29/2009      (11,465) 33  9,116    2,316 

Trust Preferred Securities held by Public Investors

  5,773 Common Stock  1,660  7/29/2009  (602) (5,972)   17  4,515  851  851 

USG TARP Preferred Stock matching the Preferred Stock held by Private Investors

  12,500 Common Stock  3,846  7/23/2009      (11,924) 38  10,615    1,270 

USG TARP Preferred Stock matching the Preferred Stock and Trust Preferred Securities held by Public Investors

  12,500 Common Stock  3,846  7/30/2009      (11,926) 39  10,615    1,272 

USG TARP Preferred Stock

  20,000 TruPS    7/30/2009  (2,883) 12,004  (19,514)       4,627 

Non-Convertible Preferred Stock held by U.S. Treasury and FDIC related to covered asset guarantee (loss-sharing agreement)

  7,059 TruPS    7/30/2009  (503) 4,237  (3,530)       (1,210)

Total

       17,372    $(3,988)$10,269 $(74,005)$173 $61,790 $851 $(2,204)

Note: Table may not foot due to roundings.

Summary of Impact of Exchange Offers

        During the third quarter of 2009, TCE increased by $60 billion as a result of the exchange of approximately $74 billion carrying amount of preferred shares and $6 billion carrying value of trust preferred securities for 17,372 million shares of common stock and approximately $27.1 billion liquidation amount of trust preferred securities (recorded asLong-term debt at its fair value of $16.2 billion). This resulted in an increase to common stock and APIC of $62 billion and a reduction inRetained earnings of approximately $2 billion, for a total increase in TCE of approximately $60 billion. The additional $64 billion of Tier 1 Common includes the impact of the above plus a reduction in the disallowed Deferred tax asset (which increases Tier 1 Common) that arises from the accounting for the transactions. TCE and Tier 1 Common are non-GAAP financial measures. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below for additional information on these measures.

(1)
TheRetained earnings impact primarily reflects:

a)
Difference between the carrying value of the preferred stock exchanged versus the fair value of the common stock and trust preferred securities issued.

b)
Value of inducement offer to the convertible preferred stock holders (calculated as the incremental shares received in excess of the original terms multiplied by stock price on the commitment date); and

c)
After-tax gain from extinguishment of debt associated with the trust preferred securities held by public investors.

(2)
After-tax gain reflected in third quarter 2009 earnings of approximately $0.9 billion from the extinguishment of debt associated with the trust preferred securities held by public investors.

(3)
Primarily represents the impact on deferred taxes of the various exchange transactions, which will benefit Tier 1 Common and Tier 1 Capital.

        Earnings per share in the third quarter of 2009 was impacted by (1) the increase in shares outstanding as a result of the issuance of common shares and interim securities and the timing thereof, (2) the net impact toRetained earnings and income statement resulting from the exchange offers and (3) dividends on USG preferred shares accrued up to the date of their conversion to interim securities and trust preferred securities.


Table of Contents


DEFERRED TAX ASSET

        Deferred taxes are recorded for the future consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, based upon enacted tax laws and rates. Deferred tax assets (DTAs) are recognized subject to management's judgment that realization is more likely than not.

        As of September 30, 2009, Citigroup had recognized a net deferred tax asset of approximately $38 billion, down $4 billion from approximately $42 billion at June 30, 2009 and down $6.5 billion from approximately $44.5 billion at December 31, 2008. Approximately $13 billion of the net deferred tax asset is included in Tier 1 and Tier 1 Common regulatory capital. The principal items reducing the deferred tax asset during 2009 were a decrease of approximately $3.9 billion relating to the exchange offers and $2.8 billion due to an increase in Other Comprehensive Income.

        Although realization is not assured, the Company believes that the realization of the recognized net deferred tax asset at September 30, 2009 is more likely than not based upon expectations of future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which it operates and available tax planning strategies.

        Approximately $17 billion of Citigroup's DTA is represented by U.S. federal, state and local tax return carry-forwards subject to expiration substantially beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2028. The remaining $21 billion DTA is largely due to timing differences between the recognition of income for GAAP and tax, representing net deductions that have not yet been taken on a tax return and are not currently subject to expiration. The most significant source of these timing differences is the loan loss reserve build, which accounts for approximately $14 billion of the net DTA. In general, Citigroup would need to generate approximately $85 billion of taxable income during the respective carry-forward periods to fully realize its U.S. federal, state and local DTA.

        Citi's ability to utilize its deferred tax assets to offset future taxable income may be significantly limited if Citi experiences an "ownership change," as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). In general, an ownership change will occur if there is a cumulative change in Citi's ownership by "5% shareholders" (as defined in the Code) that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period.

        The common stock issued pursuant to the exchange offers did not result in an ownership change under the Code. On June 9, 2009, the board of directors of Citigroup adopted a tax benefits preservation plan (the "Plan"). The purpose of the Plan is to minimize the likelihood of an ownership change occurring for Section 382 purposes and thus protect Citigroup's ability to utilize certain of its deferred tax assets, such as net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards, to offset future income. Despite adoption of the Plan, future stock issuance or transactions in our stock that may not be in our control, including sales by the USG, may cause Citi to experience an ownership change and thus limit the Company's ability to utilize its deferred tax asset and reduce its TCE and stockholders' equity.

DIVESTITURES

Sale of Nikko Cordial Securities

        On October 1, 2009, Citigroup completed the sale of its domestic Japanese domestic securities business, conducted principally through Nikko Cordial Securities Inc. (NCS) to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation in a transaction with a total cash value of approximately $8.7 billion (¥776 billion). The transaction will be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009. After considering the impact of foreign exchange hedges of the proceeds of the transaction (most of which has been recorded in the second and third quarters of 2009), the sale will result in an immaterial after-tax gain to Citigroup.

        Beginning in the second quarter of 2009, the results of NCS and its related companies are reflected as Discontinued Operations in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. At September 30, 2009, assets of $23.6 billion and liabilities of $16.0 billion are reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as "Assets/ Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale", respectively, including $3.8 billion of identifiable goodwill and intangibles.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

        As required by SFAS 165, Subsequent Events, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through November 6, 2009, which is the date its Consolidated Financial Statements were issued.

ACCOUNTING CHANGES AND FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

        See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of "Accounting Changes" and "Future Application of Accounting Standards."


Table of Contents


SEGMENT, BUSINESS AND PRODUCT PRODUCT—INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES

        The following tables show the income (loss) and revenues for Citigroup on a segment, business and product view:


Citigroup Income (Loss)CITIGROUP INCOME (LOSS)



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars
In millions of dollars
 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Income from Continuing Operations

  

Income (loss) from Continuing Operations

Income (loss) from Continuing Operations

 

CITICORP

CITICORP

  

CITICORP

 

Regional Consumer Banking

Regional Consumer Banking

  

Regional Consumer Banking

 

North America

 $163 $(44) NM $345 $470 (27)%

North America

 $62 $139 (55)%$84 $496 (83)%

EMEA

  (23) 31 NM (166) 87 NM 

EMEA

 50 (110) NM 77 (143) NM 

Latin America

  29 102 (72)% 268 867 (69)

Latin America

 491 116 NM 880 335 NM 

Asia

  446 357 25 969 1,344 (28)

Asia

 574 279 NM 1,150 527 NM 
                           
 

Total

 $615 $446 38 $1,416 $2,768 (49)% 

Total

 $1,177 $424 NM $2,191 $1,215 80%
                           

Securities and Banking

Securities and Banking

  

Securities and Banking

 

North America

 $(77)$1,340 NM $2,493 $3,368 (26)%

North America

 $839 $(32) NM $2,263 $2,465 (8)%

EMEA

  548 102 NM 3,466 674 NM 

EMEA

 355 746 (52)% 1,387 2,917 (52)

Latin America

  216 227 (5)% 1,137 853 33 

Latin America

 197 527 (63) 469 939 (50)

Asia

  68 569 (88) 1,720 1,502 15 

Asia

 294 597 (51) 772 1,653 (53)
                           
 

Total

 $755 $2,238 (66)%$8,816 $6,397 38% 

Total

 $1,685 $1,838 (8)%$4,891 $7,974 (39)%
                           

Transaction Services

Transaction Services

  

Transaction Services

 

North America

 $152 $94 62%$471 $243 94%

North America

 $166 $181 (8)%$325 $319 2%

EMEA

  308 348 (11) 984 925 6 

EMEA

 318 350 (9) 624 676 (8)

Latin America

  148 159 (7) 458 451 2 

Latin America

 153 150 2 310 310  

Asia

  331 317 4 904 899 1 

Asia

 297 293 1 616 573 8 
                           
 

Total

 $939 $918 2%$2,817 $2,518 12% 

Total

 $934 $974 (4)%$1,875 $1,878  
                           

Institutional Clients Group

Institutional Clients Group

 $2,619 $2,812 (7)%$6,766 $9,852 (31)%

Institutional Clients Group

 $1,694 $3,156 (46)%$11,633 $8,915 30%              

Total Citicorp

Total Citicorp

 $2,309 $3,602 (36)%$13,049 $11,683 12%

Total Citicorp

 $3,796 $3,236 17%$8,957 $11,067 (19)%
                           

CITI HOLDINGS

CITI HOLDINGS

  

CITI HOLDINGS

 

Brokerage and Asset Management

Brokerage and Asset Management

 $139 $(57) NM $7,011 $96 NM 

Brokerage and Asset Management

 (88)$6,775 NM $(7)$6,809 (100)%

Local Consumer Lending

Local Consumer Lending

  (2,099) (2,285) 8% (7,711) (3,366) NM 

Local Consumer Lending

 $(1,230) (4,347) 72% (3,068) (5,918) 48 

Special Asset Pool

Special Asset Pool

  142 (4,594) NM (5,095) (18,041) 72%

Special Asset Pool

 121 (1,246) NM 1,002 (5,194) NM 
             

Total Citi Holdings

Total Citi Holdings

 $(1,818)$(6,936) 74%$(5,795)$(21,311) 73%

Total Citi Holdings

 $(1,197)$1,182 NM $(2,073)$(4,303) 52%
                           

Corporate/Other

Corporate/Other

 $102 $(187) NM $(580)$(1,408) 59 

Corporate/Other

 $129 $(31) NM $93 $(683) NM 

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

 $593 $(3,521) NM $6,674 $(11,036) NM 
                           

Discontinued Operations

 $(418)$613   $(677)$578   

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

  74 $(93)   24 $(37)   

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 $2,728 $4,387 (38)%$6,977 $6,081 15%
                           

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $101 $(2,815) NM $5,973 $(10,421) NM 

Discontinued operations

Discontinued operations

 $(3)$(142) 98%$208 $(259) NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 28 (34) NM 60 (50) NM 
                           

Citigroup's net income

Citigroup's net income

 $2,697 $4,279 (37)%$7,125 $5,872 21%
             

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents


Citigroup RevenuesCITIGROUP REVENUES



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars
In millions of dollars
 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

CITICORP

CITICORP

 

CITICORP

 

Regional Consumer Banking

Regional Consumer Banking

 

Regional Consumer Banking

 

North America

 $1,754 $1,472 19%$5,604 $5,917 (5)%

North America

 $3,693 $2,182 69%$7,494 $4,685 60%

EMEA

 415 498 (17) 1,169 1,467 (20)

EMEA

 376 394 (5) 781 754 4 

Latin America

 1,826 2,300 (21) 5,436 6,906 (21)

Latin America

 2,118 1,950 9 4,194 3,874 8 

Asia

 1,680 1,839 (9) 4,842 5,674 (15)

Asia

 1,845 1,675 10 3,645 3,241 12 
                           
 

Total

 $5,675 $6,109 (7)%$17,051 $19,964 (15)%

Total

Total

 $8,032 $6,201 30%$16,114 $12,554 28%
                           

Securities and Banking

Securities and Banking

 

Securities and Banking

 

North America

 $1,312 $4,018 (67)%$8,454 $11,117 (24)%

North America

 $2,627 $1,721 53%$6,180 $6,737 (8)%

EMEA

 2,198 1,395 58 8,974 5,098 76 

EMEA

 1,762 2,558 (31) 4,277 6,780 (37)

Latin America

 703 469 50 2,547 1,872 36 

Latin America

 558 1,049 (47) 1,165 1,849 (37)

Asia

 680 1,463 (54) 4,214 4,382 (4)

Asia

 1,008 1,373 (27) 2,336 3,535 (34)
                           
 

Total

 $4,893 $7,345 (33)%$24,189 $22,469 8% 

Total

 $5,955 $6,701 (11)%$13,958 $18,901 (26)%
                           

Transaction Services

Transaction Services

 

Transaction Services

 

North America

 $643 $540 19%$1,888 $1,557 21%

North America

 $636 $656 (3)%$1,275 $1,245 2%

EMEA

 845 953 (11) 2,549 2,784 (8)

EMEA

 848 860 (1) 1,681 1,704 (1)

Latin America

 337 378 (11) 1,020 1,092 (7)

Latin America

 356 340 5 700 683 2 

Asia

 632 695 (9) 1,857 2,029 (8)

Asia

 662 627 6 1,283 1,225 5 
                           
 

Total

 $2,457 $2,566 (4)$7,314 $7,462 (2)% 

Total

 $2,502 $2,483 1%$4,939 $4,857 2%
                           

Institutional Clients Group

Institutional Clients Group

 $8,457 $9,184 (8)%$18,897 $23,758 (20)%

Institutional Clients Group

 $7,350 $9,911 (26)%$31,503 $29,931 5%              

Total Citicorp

 $13,025 $16,020 (19)%$48,554 $49,895 (3)%
 

Total Citicorp

 $16,489 $15,385 7%$35,011 $36,312 (4)%
                           

CITI HOLDINGS

CITI HOLDINGS

 

CITI HOLDINGS

 

Brokerage and Asset Management

Brokerage and Asset Management

 $670 $2,094 (68)%$14,710 $6,951 NM 

Brokerage and Asset Management

 $141 $12,220 (99)%$481 $13,827 (97)%

Local Consumer Lending

Local Consumer Lending

 4,647 5,432 (14) 15,030 19,156 (22)%

Local Consumer Lending

 4,206 3,481 21 8,876 9,502 (7)

Special Asset Pool

Special Asset Pool

 1,377 (6,822) NM (3,844) (27,842) 86 

Special Asset Pool

 572 (376) NM 2,112 (4,910) NM 
             

Total Citi Holdings

Total Citi Holdings

 $6,694 $704 NM $25,896 $(1,735) NM 

Total Citi Holdings

 $4,919 $15,325 (68)%$11,469 $18,419 (38)%
                           

Corporate/Other

Corporate/Other

 $671 $(466) NM $430 $(2,207) NM 

Corporate/Other

 $663 $(741) NM $1,012 $(241) NM 

Total Net Revenues

 $20,390 $16,258 25%$74,880 $45,953 63%
                           

Total net revenues

Total net revenues

 $22,071 $29,969 (26)%$47,492 $54,490 (13)%
             

Impact of Credit Card Securitization Activity(1)

 
 

Citicorp

 $ $1,644 NM $ $3,128 NM 
 

Citi Holdings

  1,482 NM  2,450 NM 
             

Total impact of credit card securitization activity

Total impact of credit card securitization activity

 $ $3,126 NM $ $5,578 NM 
             

Total Citigroup—managed net revenues(1)

Total Citigroup—managed net revenues(1)

 $22,071 $33,095 (33)%$47,492 $60,068 (21)%
             

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents


CITICORP

        Citicorp is the company's global bank for consumers and businesses and represents Citi's core franchise. Citicorp is focused on providing best-in-class products and services to customers and leveraging Citigroup's unparalleled global network. Citicorp is physically present in approximately 100 countries, many for over 100 years, and offers services in over 160 countries and jurisdictions. Citi believes this global network provides a strong foundation for servicing the broad financial services needs of large multinational clients and for meeting the needs of retail, private banking and commercial customers around the world. Citigroup's global footprint provides coverage of the world's emerging economies, which Citi believes represents a strong area of growth. At June 30, 2010, Citicorp had approximately $1.2 trillion of assets and $719 billion of deposits, representing approximately 62% of Citi's total assets and approximately 88% of its deposits.

        Citicorp consists of the following businesses:Regional Consumer Banking (which includes retail banking and Citi-branded cards in four regions—North America, EMEA, Latin America andAsia) andInstitutional Clients Group (which includesSecurities and Banking andTransaction Services).



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $8,435 $8,316 1%$25,067 $24,980  

Net interest revenue

 $9,742 $8,774 11%$19,612 $17,285 13%

Non-interest revenue

 4,590 7,704 (40) 23,487 24,915 (6)%

Non-interest revenue

 6,747 6,611 2 15,399 19,027 (19)
                           

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $13,025 $16,020 (19)%$48,554 $49,895 (3)%

Total revenues, net of interest expense

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $16,489 $15,385 7%$35,011 $36,312 (4)%
                           

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 

Net credit losses

 $1,718 $1,317 30%$4,515 $3,535 28%

Net credit losses

 $2,965 $1,575 88%$6,107 $2,826 NM 

Credit reserve build (release)

 465 799 (42) 2,570 1,846 39 

Credit reserve build (release)

 (639) 1,231 NM (999) 2,229 NM 
                           

Provision for loan losses

 $2,183 $2,116 3 $7,085 $5,381 32%

Provision for loan losses

 $2,326 $2,806 (17)%$5,108 $5,055 1%

Provision for benefits & claims

 14   41 3 NM 

Provision for benefits and claims

 27 42 (36) 71 84 (15)

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

  (80) 100 115 (155) NM 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

 (26) 83 NM (33) 115 NM 
                           
 

Total provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $2,197 $2,036 8%$7,241 $5,229 38% 

Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $2,327 $2,931 (21)%$5,146 $5,254 (2)%
                           

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 $8,181 $8,948 (9)$23,227 $28,174 (18)%

Total operating expenses

 $9,090 $8,068 13%$17,575 $15,467 14%
                           

Income from continuing operations before taxes

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $2,647 $5,036 (47)%$18,086 $16,492 10%

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $5,072 $4,386 16%$12,290 $15,591 (21)%

Provision for income taxes

 338 1,434 (76) 5,037 4,809 5 

Provisions for income taxes

Provisions for income taxes

 1,276 1,150 11 3,333 4,524 (26)
                           

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 $2,309 $3,602 (36)%$13,049 $11,683 12%

Income from continuing operations

 $3,796 $3,236 17%$8,957 $11,067 (19)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 25 16 56 25 50 (50)

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 20 3 NM 41   
                           

Citicorp's net income

Citicorp's net income

 $2,284 $3,586 (36)%$13,024 $11,633 12%

Citicorp's net income

 $3,776 $3,233 17%$8,916 $11,067 (19)%
                           

Balance Sheet Data (in billions)

 

Balance sheet data(in billions of dollars)

Balance sheet data(in billions of dollars)

 

Total EOP assets

Total EOP assets

 $1,014 $1,158 (12)%       

Total EOP assets

 $1,211 $1,051 15%       

Average assets

Average assets

 $1,032 $1,175 (12)%$1,024 $1,287 (20)%

Average assets

 1,250 1,074 16 $1,242 $1,066 17%

Return on assets

Return on assets

 1.21% 1.21%   1.45% 2.09%   

Total EOP deposits

Total EOP deposits

 $728 $683 7%       

Total EOP deposits

 $719 $706 2%       
                           

Total GAAP revenues

Total GAAP revenues

 $16,489 $15,385 7%$35,011 $36,312 (4)%

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

  1,644 NM  3,128 NM 
             

Total managed revenues

Total managed revenues

 $16,489 $17,029 (3)%$35,011 $39,440 (11)%
             

GAAP net credit losses

GAAP net credit losses

 $2,965 $1,575 88%$6,107 $2,826 NM 

Impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

  1,837 NM  3,328 NM 
             

Total managed net credit losses

Total managed net credit losses

 $2,965 $3,412 (13)%$6,107 $6,154 (1)%
             

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NM
Not meaningful


Table of Contents


REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

Regional Consumer Banking (RCB) consists of Citigroup's four regional consumer banking businesses that provide traditional banking services to retail customers.RCB also contains Citigroup's branded cards business and Citi's local commercial banking business.RCB is a globally diversified business with over 4,200 branches in 39 countries around the world. During the first quarter of 2010, 53% of totalRCB revenues were from outsideNorth America. Additionally, the majority of international revenues and loans were from emerging economies inAsia, Latin America, and Central and Eastern Europe. At June 30, 2010,RCB had $309 billion of assets and $291 billion of deposits.



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 Second Quarter % Six Months % 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 Change 2010 2009 Change 

Net interest revenue

Net interest revenue

 $3,992 $4,224 (5)%$11,508 $12,429 (7)%

Net interest revenue

 $5,774 $4,140 39%$11,691 $7,982 46%

Non-interest revenue

Non-interest revenue

 1,683 1,885 (11) 5,543 7,535 (26)

Non-interest revenue

 2,258 2,061 10 4,423 4,572 (3)
                           

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $5,675 $6,109 (7)%$17,051 $19,964 (15)%

Total revenues, net of interest expense

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $8,032 $6,201 30%$16,114 $12,554 28%
                           

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 $3,547 $4,029 (12)%$10,344 $12,005 (14)%

Total operating expenses

 $3,982 $3,703 8%$7,919 $7,207 10%
                           
 

Net credit losses

 $1,426 $1,096 30%$3,978 $2,940 35%

Net credit losses

 $2,922 $1,406 NM $5,962 $2,580 NM 
 

Credit reserve build (release)

 319 514 (38) 1,575 1,346 17 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

 (4)   (4)   
 

Provision for benefits & claims

 14   41 3 NM 

Credit reserve build (release)

 (408) 619 NM (588) 1,305 NM 
             

Provisions for benefits and claims

 27 42 (36)% 71 84 (15)%

Provision for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $1,759 $1,610 9%$5,594 $4,289 30%
             

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $2,537 $2,067 23%$5,441 $3,969 37%
                           

Income from continuing operations before taxes

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 369 $470 (21) 1,113 $3,670 (70)%

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $1,513 $431 NM $2,754 $1,378 100%

Income taxes (benefits)

 (246) 24 NM (303) 902 NM 

Income taxes

Income taxes

 336 7 NM 563 163 NM 
                           

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 $615 $446 38%$1,416 $2,768 (49)%

Income from continuing operations

 $1,177 $424 NM $2,191 $1,215 80%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 2 5 (60) 2 10 (80)

Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

    (5)   
                           

Net income

Net income

 $613 $441 39%$1,414 $2,758 (49)%

Net income

 $1,177 $424 NM $2,196 $1,215 81%
                           

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $201 $222 (9)% 191 $225 (15)%

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $306 $239 28%$307 $234 31%

Return on assets

Return on assets

 1.21% 0.79%   0.99% 1.64%   

Return on assets

 1.54% 0.71%   1.44% 1.05%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 275 266 3%       

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 291 272 7%       

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

 4.70% 3.35%         
             

Managed net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans

Managed net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans

 5.38% 6.01%         
                           

Revenue by business

Revenue by business

 

Revenue by business

 

Retail banking

 $3,916 $3,789 3%$7,730 $7,326 6%

Citi-branded cards

 4,116 2,412 71 8,384�� 5,228 60 
             
 

Total GAAP revenues

 $8,032 $6,201 30%$16,114 $12,554 28%

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

  1,644 NM  3,128 NM 
             

Total managed revenues

 $8,032 $7,845 2%$16,114 $15,682 3%
             

Net credit losses by business

Net credit losses by business

 

Retail banking

 $304 $428 (29)%$593 $766 (23)%

Citi-branded cards

 2,618 978 NM $5,369 $1,814 NM 
             

Retail Banking

 $3,315 $3,531 (6)%$9,463 $10,559 (10)% 

Total GAAP net credit losses

 $2,922 $1,406 NM $5,962 $2,580 NM 

Citi-Branded Cards

 2,360 2,578 (8) 7,588 9,405 (19)

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

  1,837 NM  3,328 NM 
                           
 

Total revenues

 $5,675 $6,109 (7)%$17,051 $19,964 (15)%

Total managed net credit losses

 $2,922 $3,243 (10)%$5,962 $5,908 1%
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Retail Banking

 $609 $563 8%$1,480 $1,826 (19)%

Retail banking

 $884 $635 (39)%$1,732 $1,285 35%

Citi-Branded Cards

 6 (117) NM (64) 942 NM 

Citi-branded cards

 293 (211) NM 459 (70) NM 
                           
 

Total

 $615 $446 38%$1,416 $2,768 (49)% 

Total

 $1,177 $424 NM $2,191 $1,215 80%
                           

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NM
Not meaningful


Table of Contents


NORTH AMERICA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

North America Regional Consumer Banking (NA RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses in the U.S.NA RCB's approximately 1,000 retail bank branches and 13.3 million retail customer accounts are largely concentrated in the greater metropolitan areas of New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Miami, Washington, D.C., Boston, Philadelphia, and certain larger cities in Texas. At June 30, 2010,NA RCB had approximately $30.2 billion of retail banking and residential real estate loans and $144.7 billion of deposits. In addition,NA RCB had approximately 21.3 million Citi-branded credit card accounts, with $77.2 billion in outstanding card loan balances.



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

Net interest revenue

 $1,224 $978 25%$3,394 $2,673 27%

Net interest revenue

 $2,778 $1,330 NM $5,732 $2,522 NM 

Non-interest revenue

Non-interest revenue

 530 494 7 2,210 3,244 (32)

Non-interest revenue

 915 852 7% 1,762 2,163 (19)%
                           

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,754 $1,472 19%$5,604 $5,917 (5)%

Total revenues, net of interest expense

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $3,693 $2,182 69%$7,494 $4,685 60%
                           

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 $1,331 $1,444 (8)%$4,023 $4,507 (11)%

Total operating expenses

 $1,499 $1,486 1%$3,110 $2,980 4%
                           

Net credit losses

 $280 $144 94%$843 $425 98%

Net credit losses

 $2,126 $307 NM $4,283 $564 NM 

Credit reserve build (release)

 30 (9) NM 402 286 41 

Credit reserve build (release)

 (9) 149 NM (5) 402 NM 

Provision for benefits and claims

 14   41 2 NM 

Provisions for benefits and claims

 5 15 (67)% 13 28 (54)%
                           

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $324 $135 NM $1,286 $713 80%

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $2,122 $471 NM $4,291 $994 NM 
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $99 $(107) NM $295 $697 (58)%

Income from continuing operations before taxes

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $72 $225 (68)%$93 $711 (87)%

Income taxes (benefits)

Income taxes (benefits)

 (64) (63) (2)% (50) 227 NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

 10 86 (88) 9 215 (96)
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $163 $(44) NM $345 $470 (27)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

       

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 $62 $139 (55)%$84 $496 (83)%

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

       
                           

Net income (loss)

 $163 $(44) NM $345 $470 (27)%

Net income

Net income

 $62 $139 (55)%$84 $496 (83)%
                           

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $117 $74 58%$119 $73 63%

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 $139 $121 15%       

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 145.5 139.6 4       

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

 5.94% 3.51%         
             

Managed net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans(1)

Managed net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans(1)

 7.98% 7.36%         
                           

Revenue by business

Revenue by business

 

Revenue by business

 

Retail banking

 $1,323 $1,376 (4)%$2,603 $2,672 (3)%

Citi-branded cards

 2,370 806 NM 4,891 2,013 NM 
             
 

Total GAAP revenues

 $3,693 $2,182 69%$7,494 $4,685 60%

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(2)

  1,644 NM  3,128 NM 
             

Total managed revenues

 $3,693 $3,826 (3)%$7,494 $7,813 (4)%
             

Net credit losses by business

Net credit losses by business

 

Retail banking

 $79 $88 (10)%$152 $144 6%

Citi-branded cards

 2,047 219 NM 4,131 420 NM 
             

Retail banking

 $1,070 $1,004 7%$2,907 $2,806 4% 

Total GAAP net credit losses

 $2,126 $307 NM $4,283 $564 NM 

Citi-branded cards

 684 468 46 2,697 3,111 (13)

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(2)

  1,837 NM  3,328 NM 
                           
 

Total

 $1,754 $1,472 19%$5,604 $5,917 (5)%

Total managed net credit losses

 $2,126 $2,144 (1)%$4,283 $3,892 10%
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Retail banking

 $150 $143 5%$319 $205 56%

Retail banking

 $225 $242 (7)%$409 $483 (15)%

Citi-branded cards

 13 (187) NM 26 265 (90)

Citi-branded cards

 (163) (103) (58) (325) 13 NM 
                           
 

Total

 $163 $(44) NM $345 $470 (27)% 

Total

 $62 $139 (55)%$84 $496 (83)%
                           

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

        Overall, most key revenue drivers

(1)
See "Managed Presentations" below.

(2)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in North America regional consumer banking were stable or higher in the third quarter of 2009 as comparedNote 1 to the second quarter of 2009. The key focus in Citi's North America consumer businesses will likely remain on engagement with customers to raise deposits and to offer loans. However, recovery is expected to be driven by improvement in credit in the key North American businesses. For a further discussion, see "Loan and Credit Details—Consumer Loan Modification Programs" and "—U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending" below.Consolidated Financial Statements.

NM
Not meaningful

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 19%69% primarily due to the consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 effective January 2010. On a managed basis,revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 3%, primarily reflecting higherthe net interest marginimpact of the CARD Act on branded cards revenues and lower volumes in cards higher volumes in retail banking, and better securitization revenue, offset by higher credit losses in the securitization trusts.mortgages.

Net interest revenue was up 25%down 8% on a managed basis, driven by higherthe net interest marginimpact of the CARD Act as well as lower volumes in cards, as a result of higher interest revenuewhere average managed loans were down 7% from pricing actionsthe prior-year quarter, and lower funding costs, and by the impact of higher deposit and loan volumes in retail banking. Average depositsbanking, where average loans were 15% higher than the prior year, driven by growth in both consumer and commercial deposits.down 12%.

Non-interest revenue increased 7%11% on a managed basis primarily driven bydue to better securitization revenue,servicing hedge results in mortgages, partially offset by higher credit losses flowing throughlower fees in cards, mainly due to a 15% decline in open accounts from the securitization trusts.prior-year quarter.

        Operating expenses declined 8%,increased 1% from the prior-year quarter primarily reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and lowerdue to higher marketing costs.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $189 million$1.7 billion primarily due to risingthe consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of


Table of Contents

SFAS 166/167. On a comparable basis,Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased $186 million, or 8%, primarily due to the absence of a $149 million loan loss reserve build in the prior-year quarter and lower net credit losses. Net credit losses were down $9 million in both cards and retail banking. Continued weakening of leading credit indicators and trends in the macro-economic environment, including rising unemployment and higher bankruptcy filings, drove higher credit costs. The branded cards managed net credit loss ratio increased 339 basis pointsfrom 10.08% to 7.06%10.77%, whileand the retail banking net credit loss ratio increased 120 basis pointsfrom 1.01% to 4.23%.1.03%, with the increases in both businesses driven by the decline in their average loans.

        The increase inNet Income also reflected a tax benefit resulting from the federal tax reserve release in the third quarter of 2009.

3Q092Q10 YTD vs. 3Q082Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 60% primarily due to the consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 effective January 2010. On a managed basis,revenues, net of interest expense, declined 5%, primarily reflecting higher credit losses in4% from the securitization trusts, offset by higher net interest marginprior-year period, mainly due to lower volumes in cards and higher volumes in retail banking.mortgages, as well as the net impact of the CARD Act on branded cards revenues.

Net interest revenue was up 27%down 5% on a managed basis driven primarily by the impact of pricing actions and lower funding costsvolumes in cards, and by higher deposit volumes in retail banking, with average deposits up 10%managed loans down 6% from the prior-year period.period, and in mortgages, where average loans were down 13%.

Non-interest revenue declined 32%1% on a managed basis from the prior-year period, driven by higher credit losses flowing through the securitization trustslower gains from mortgage loan sales and lower fees in cards, due to a 15% decline in open accounts, partially offset by better


Table of Contents

securitization revenue, and by the absence of a $349 million gain on the sale of Visa shares and a $170 million gain from a cards portfolio sale servicing hedge results in the prior-year period.mortgages.

        Operating expenses declined 11%, reflectingincreased 4% from the benefits from re-engineering efforts, lower marketing costs, andprior-year period. Expenses were flat excluding the absenceimpact of $126 million of repositioning charges recordeda litigation reserve in the prior-year period, offset by the absencefirst quarter of a prior-year $159 million Visa litigation reserve release.2010.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $573 million or 80%$3.3 billion primarily due to risingthe consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167. On a comparable basis,Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased $31 million, or 1%, primarily due to the absence of a $402 million loan loss reserve build in the prior-year period, offset by higher net credit losses in boththe branded cards and retail banking. Continued weakening of leading credit indicators and trends in the macro-economic environment, including rising unemployment and higher bankruptcy filings, drove higher credit costs.portfolio. The cards managed net credit loss ratio increased 332 basis pointsfrom 9.17% to 6.74%10.72%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio increased 70 basis pointsfrom 0.84% to 4.12%0.97%.

Managed Presentations

 
 Second Quarter 
 
 2010 2009 

Managed credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans

  7.98% 7.36%

Impact from credit card securitizations(1)

    (4.75)%
      

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

  7.98% 2.61%
      

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents


EMEA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

EMEA Regional Consumer Banking (EMEA RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses, primarily in Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Remaining activities in respect of Western Europe retail banking are included in Citi Holdings.EMEA RCB has repositioned its business, shifting from a strategy of widespread distribution to a focused strategy concentrating on larger urban markets within the region. An exception is Bank Handlowy, which has a mass market presence in Poland. The countries in whichEMEA RCB has the largest presence are Poland, Turkey, Russia and the United Arab Emirates. At June 30, 2010,EMEA RCB had approximately 304 retail bank branches with approximately 3.7 million customer accounts, $4.3 billion in retail banking loans and $8.9 billion in average deposits. In addition, the business had approximately 2.4 million Citi-branded card accounts with $2.6 billion in outstanding card loan balances.



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

Net interest revenue

 $262 $350 (25)%$729 $984 (26)%

Net interest revenue

 $230 $243 (5)%$478 $467 2%

Non-interest revenue

Non-interest revenue

 153 148 3 440 483 (9)

Non-interest revenue

 146 151 (3) 303 287 6 
                           

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $415 $498 (17)%$1,169 $1,467 (20)%

Total revenues, net of interest expense

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $376 $394 (5)%$781 $754 4%
                           

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 $270 $372 (27)%$808 $1,142 (29)%

Total operating expenses

 $268 $282 (5)%$545 $538 1%
                           

Net credit losses

 $139 $55 NM $349 $150 NM 

Net credit losses

 $85 $121 (30)%$182 $210 (13)%

Credit reserve build (release)

 67 33 NM 297 64 NM 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

 (4)   (4)   
             

Credit reserve build (release)

 (46) 158 NM (56) 230 NM 

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $206 $88 NM $646 $214 NM 

Provisions for benefits and claims

       
             

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $35 $279 (87)%$122 $440 (72)%
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(61)$38 NM $(285)$111 NM 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $73 $(167) NM $114 $(224) NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

Income taxes (benefits)

 (38) 7 NM (119) 24 NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

 23 (57) NM 37 (81) NM 
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(23)$31 NM $(166)$87 NM 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $50 $(110) NM $77 $(143) NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 2 5 (60)% 2 11 (82)%

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

       
                           

Net income (loss)

Net income (loss)

 $(25)$26 NM $(168)$76 NM 

Net income (loss)

 $50 $(110) NM $77 $(143) NM 
                           

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $11 $14 (21)%$11 $14 (21)%

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $10 $11 (9)%$10 $11 (9)%

Return on assets

Return on assets

 (0.90)% 0.74%   (2.04)% 0.73%   

Return on assets

 2.01% (4.01)%   1.55% (2.62)%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 10 11 (9)%       

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 $8.9 $9.0 (1)%$9.3 $8.7 7%

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

 6.34% 2.10%         
             

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

 4.74% 5.78%         
                           

Revenue by business

Revenue by business

 

Revenue by business

 

Retail banking

 $237 $310 (24)%$676 $931 (27)%

Retail banking

 $205 $234 (12)%$427 $439 (3)%

Citi-branded cards

 178 188 (5) 493 536 (8)

Citi-branded cards

 171 160 7 354 315 12 
                           
 

Total

 $415 $498 (17)%$1,169 $1,467 (20)% 

Total

 $376 $394 (5)%$781 $754 4%
             
����             

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Retail banking

 $(23)$(2) NM $(140)$(4) NM 

Retail banking

 $9 $(76) NM $3 $(117) NM 

Citi-branded cards

  33 (100)% (26) 91 NM 

Citi-branded cards

 41 (34) NM 74 (26) NM 
                           
 

Total

 $(23)$31 NM $(166)$87 NM  

Total

 $50 $(110) NM $77 $(143) NM 
                           

NM
Not meaningful

3Q092Q10 vs. 3Q082Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense declined 17%, decreased 5%. More than halfA majority of the revenue declinedecrease is due to lower lending volumes and balances as a result of tighter origination criteria as the business was attributable to changesrepositioned. This was partially offset by higher revenues in cards and wealth management and the impact of foreign currencyexchange translation (generally referred to throughout this report as "FX translation"). Other drivers included lower wealthCards purchase sales were up 11% and investment sales were up 40%. Assets under management and lending revenuesdecreased 9% primarily due to lower volumes and spread compression. Investment sales and assets under management declined by 29% and 25%, respectively.market valuations.

Net interest revenue was 25%decreased 5% due to lower thanAverage Loans, particularly in the prior-year period with averageUnited Arab Emirates, Romania and Poland. Average retail and card loans for retail banking down 22% as a result of a lower risk profile,decreased 20% and 4%, respectively.

Non-interest revenue decreased 3%.

Operating expenses decreased 5%, mainly due to cost savings from branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering benefits, partially offset by the impact of FX translation.

        Operating expenses declined 27%, reflecting expense control actions, lower marketing expenditure and the impact of FX translation. Cost savings were primarily achieved by branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering efforts.

Provisions for loancredit losses and for benefits and claims increased $118decreased 87%, mainly due to the impact of a $46 million to $206 millionloan loss reserve release in the thirdcurrent quarter, of 2009. While delinquencies improved during the third quarter of 2009 as compared to a $158 million build in the secondprior-year quarter, of 2009,and a 30% decline in net credit losses, continued to increase from $55 million to $139 million, and thedriven by improvements in credit conditions across most markets. The release in loan loss reserve build increased from $33 million to $67 million. Higher credit costs reflected continued credit deterioration, particularlyreserves in the UAE, Turkey, Poland and Russia.current period was driven by improvement in the credit environment in most countries, coupled with a decline in receivables. The cards net credit loss ratio decreased from 6.73% in the prior-year quarter to 5.79% in the current quarter. The retail banking net credit loss ratio decreased from 5.30% in the prior-year quarter to 4.10% in the current quarter.

3Q092Q10 YTD vs. 3Q082Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense declined 20%, increased 4%. Over half of the revenue declineThe increase in revenues was primarily attributable to the impact of FX translation. Other drivers includedtranslation and higher revenues in cards due to higher volumes, partially offset by lower wealth management and lending revenues, as a result of lower volumes due to lower volumestighter origination criteria as the business was repositioned. Cards purchase sales increased 14% and spread compression. Investment sales and assets under management declined by 42% and 25%, respectively.average cards loans grew 6%.

Net interest revenue was 26% lower thanincreased 2%, mainly due to higher cards revenues, particularly in Russia and Poland, and the prior-year period with average loans for retail banking down 20% and average deposits down 22%.impact of FX translation.


Table of Contents

Non-interest revenue decreased by 9%increased 6%, primarily due to the impact of FX translation.driven by higher results from an equity investment in Turkey.

        Operating expenses declined 29%, reflecting expense control actions, lower marketing spend andincreased 1% driven by the impact of FX translation. Costtranslation, largely offset by cost savings were achieved byfrom branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering efforts.benefits.

        Provisions for loancredit losses and for benefits and claims increased $432 milliondecreased 72%, mainly due to $646 million. Net credit losses increased from $150 million to $349 million, while the impact of net loan loss reserve release of $56 million in the first half of 2010, compared to a $230 million build in the prior-year period, and a 13% decline in net credit losses. The release of loan loss reserves in the current period was driven by improvement in the credit environment in most countries, coupled with a decline in receivables. The cards net credit loss ratio increased from $64 million5.68% to $297 million. Higher6.41%, while the retail banking net credit costs reflected continued credit deterioration across the region.loss ratio decreased from 4.91% to 3.91%.


Table of Contents


LATIN AMERICA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

Latin America Regional Consumer Banking (LATAM RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses, with the largest presence in Mexico and Brazil.LATAM RCB includes branch networks throughoutLatin America as well as Banamex, Mexico's second largest bank with over 1,700 branches. At June 30, 2010,LATAM RCB had approximately 2,205 retail branches, with 25.9 million customer accounts, $19.6 billion in retail banking loan balances and $39.9 billion in average deposits. In addition, the business had approximately 12.2 million Citi-branded card accounts with $12.0 billion in outstanding loan balances.



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

Net interest revenue

 $1,339 $1,669 (20)%$3,940 $5,046 (22)%

Net interest revenue

 $1,471 $1,368 8%$2,929 $2,643 11%

Non-interest revenue

Non-interest revenue

 487 631 (23) 1,496 1,860 (20)

Non-interest revenue

 647 582 11 1,265 1,231 3 
                           

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,826 $2,300 (21)%$5,436 $6,906 (21)%

Total revenues, net of interest expense

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $2,118 $1,950 9%$4,194 $3,874 8%
                           

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 $1,077 $1,292 (17)%$3,027 $3,475 (13)%

Total operating expenses

 $1,266 $1,090 16%$2,408 $2,048 18%
                           

Net credit losses

 $656 $640 3%$1,809 $1,661 9%

Net credit losses

 $457 $610 (25)%$966 $1,151 (16)%

Credit reserve build (release)

 141 301 (53) 461 695 (34)

Credit reserve build (release)

 (241) 156 NM (377) 322 NM 

Provision for benefits and claims

     1 (100)

Provision for benefits and claims

 22 27 (19) 58 56 4 
                           

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $797 $941 (15)%$2,270 $2,357 (4)%

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $238 $793 (70)%$647 $1,529 (58)%
                           

Income from continuing operations before taxes

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $(48)$67 NM $139 $1,074 (87)%

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $614 $67 NM $1,139 $297 NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

 (77) (35) NM (129) 207 NM 

Income taxes

Income taxes

 123 (49) NM 259 (38) NM 
                           

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 $29 $102 (72)%$268 $867 (69)%

Income from continuing operations

 $491 $116 NM $880 $335 NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

       

Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

    (5)   
                           

Net income

Net income

 $29 $102 (72)%$268 $867 (69)%

Net income

 $491 $116 NM $885 $335 NM 
                           

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 61 $81 (25)% 59 $78 (24)%

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $74 $66 12 $73 $63 16%

Return on assets

Return on assets

 0.19% 0.50%   0.61% 1.48%   

Return on assets

 2.66% 0.70%   2.44% 1.07%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 36 42 (14)%       

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 39.9 36.0 11% 39.8 35.1 13%

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

 9.04 7.79         
             

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

 5.84% 8.68%         
                           

Revenue by business

Revenue by business

 

Revenue by business

 

Retail banking

 $969 $1,067 (9)%$2,843 $3,180 (11)%

Retail banking

 $1,236 $1,112 11%$2,432 $2,138 14%

Citi-branded cards

 857 1,233 (30) 2,593 3,726 (30)

Citi-branded cards

 882 838 5 1,762 1,736 1 
                           
 

Total

 $1,826 $2,300 (21)%$5,436 $6,906 (21)% 

Total

 $2,118 $1,950 9%$4,194 $3,874 8%
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Retail banking

 $106 $112 (5)%$436 $573 (24)%

Retail banking

 $275 $196 40%$531 $426 25%

Citi-branded cards

 (77) (10) NM (168) 294 NM 

Citi-branded cards

 216 (80) NM 349 (91) NM 
                           
 

Total

 $29 $102 (72)%$268 $867 (69)% 

Total

 $491 $116 NM $880 $335 NM 
                           

NM
Not meaningful

3Q092Q10 vs. 3Q082Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense declined 21%, increased 9%, mainly due to the impact of FX translation lower cards receivables and spread compression,higher lending and deposit volumes in retail banking, partially offset by higher businesslower volumes in retail banking. the cards portfolio, due to continued repositioning, particularly in Mexico.

Net interest revenue was 20% lower than the prior year caused increased 8%, mainly driven by the decrease in cards receivables as well as lower spreads resulting from a lower risk profile, partially offset byimpact of FX translation and higher businesslending and deposit volumes in retail banking. Average retail banking loans and deposits were down 14%increased 19% and 11%, due primarily torespectively. The increase in retail banking volumes was partially offset by lower volumes in the impactcards business as a result of FX translation. a lower risk profile.

Non-interest revenue declined 23% increased 11%, primarily due to the impact of FX translation.translation, higher fees in the cards business and higher investment sales revenues.

        Operating expenses declined 17%increased 16%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts anddue to the impact of FX translation.translation, marketing initiatives and a cards intangible impairment.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased $144 million70%, mainly due to lowerthe impact of a $241 million loan loss reserve build of $160 million. While delinquencies decreased duringrelease in the third quarter 2009 ascurrent period, compared to a $156 million build in the secondprior-year quarter, 2009,and a 25% decline in net credit losses, reflecting improved credit conditions, especially in Mexico cards. The cards net credit loss rates increasedratio declined across the region during the period, from 16.2%15.91% to 18.1%. Rising losses were apparent in Brazil and Mexico; however, the business continues12.07%, reflecting continued economic recovery. The retail banking net credit loss ratio dropped significantly from 3.40% to focus on repositioning and de-risking the portfolio, particularly in the Mexico cards business.1.98%.

3Q092Q10 YTD vs. 3Q082Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 21%increased 8%, mainly due to the impact of FX translation and higher lending and deposit volumes in retail banking, partially offset by spread compression and lower volumes in the cards portfolio due to continued repositioning, particularly in Mexico.

Net interest revenue increased 11%, mainly driven by the impact of FX translation and higher lending and deposit volumes in retail banking. Average retail banking loans and deposits increased 20% and 13%, respectively. The increase in retail banking was partially offset by spread compression and lower volumes and spread compression in the cards business. Net interestportfolio as a result of a lower risk profile.

Non-interest revenue was 22% lower than the prior year with average credit cards loans down 22% increased 3%, and net interest margin decreasing as well due to the cards spread compression impact. Non-interest revenue declined 20%, primarily due to the decline in cards fees as well as the impact of FX translation.translation, higher fees in the cards business and higher investment sales revenues.

        Operating expenses declined 13%increased 18%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts andmainly due to the impact of FX translation. The prior-year period also included a $257 million expense benefit related to a legal vehicle restructuringExcluding the impact of FX translation, the increase in operating


Table of Contents

expenses was driven by the cost of 139 additional branch openings and marketing initiatives, primarily in Mexico.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased $8758%, mainly due to the impact of net loan loss reserve release of $377 million or 4%. Cardsin the first half of 2010, compared to a $322 million build in the prior-year period, and a 16% decline in net credit losses, reflecting improved credit conditions, especially in Mexico cards. The cards net credit loss rates increasedratio declined from 11.6%15.5% to 16.7%. Credit deterioration was apparent in Brazil and Mexico where13.0%, while the business has focused its repositioning and derisking efforts.retail banking net credit loss ratio declined from 3.2% to 2.0%.


Table of Contents


ASIA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

Asia Regional Consumer Banking (Asia RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses, with the largest Citi presence in South Korea, Australia, Singapore, India, Taiwan, Malaysia, Japan and Hong Kong. At June 30, 2010,Asia RCB had approximately 704 retail branches, 16.0 million retail banking accounts, $97.1 billion in average customer deposits, and $55.0 billion in retail banking loans. In addition, the business had approximately 14.9 million Citi-branded card accounts with $17.6 billion in outstanding loan balances.



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

Net interest revenue

 $1,167 $1,227 (5)%$3,445 $3,726 (8)%

Net interest revenue

 $1,295 $1,199 8%$2,552 $2,350 9%

Non-interest revenue

Non-interest revenue

 513 612 (16) 1,397 1,948 (28)

Non-interest revenue

 550 476 16 1,093 891 23 
                           

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,680 $1,839 (9)%$4,842 $5,674 (15)%

Total revenues, net of interest expense

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,845 $1,675 10%$3,645 $3,241 12%
                           

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 $869 $921 (6)%$2,486 $2,881 (14)%

Total operating expenses

 $949 $845 12%$1,856 $1,641 13%
                           

Net credit losses

 $351 $257 37 977 $704 39%

Net credit losses

 $254 $368 (31)%$531 $655 (19)%

Credit reserve build (release)

 81 189 (57)% 415 301 38 

Credit reserve build (release)

 (112) 156 NM (150) 351 NM 
                           

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $432 $446 (3)%$1,392 $1,005 39%

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $142 $524 (73)%$381 $1,006 (62)%
                           

Income from continuing operations before taxes

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $379 $472 (20)%$964 $1,788 (46)%

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $754 $306 NM $1,408 $594 NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

 (67) 115 NM (5) 444 NM 

Income taxes

Income taxes

 180 27 NM 258 67 NM 
                           

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 $446 $357 25%$969 $1,344 (28)%

Income from continuing operations

 $574 $279 NM $1,150 $527 NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (1) 100 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

       
                           

Net income

Net income

 $446 $357 25%$969 $1,345 (28)%

Net income

 $574 $279 NM $1,150 $527 NM 
                           

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $92 $95 (3)%$87 $96 (9)

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $105 $88 19%$105 $87 21%

Return on assets

Return on assets

 1.92% 1.49%   1.49% 1.87%   

Return on assets

 2.19% 1.27%   2.21% 1.22%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 91 93 (2)       

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 97.1 87.6 11% 96.4 85.4 13%

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

 2.17 1.44         
             

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

 1.41% 2.35%         
                           

Revenue by business

Revenue by business

 

Revenue by business

 

Retail banking

 $1,039 $1,150 (10)%$3,037 $3,642 (17)%

Retail banking

 $1,152 $1,067 8%$2,268 $2,077 9%

Citi-branded cards

 641 689 (7) 1,805 2,032 (11)

Citi-branded cards

 693 608 14 1,377 1,164 18 
                           
 

Total

 $1,680 $1,839 (9)%$4,842 $5,674 (15)% 

Total

 $1,845 $1,675 10%$3,645 $3,241 12%
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Income from continuing operations by business

Income from continuing operations by business

 

Retail banking

 $376 $310 21%$865 $1,052 (18)%

Retail banking

 $375 $273 37%$789 $493 60%

Citi-branded cards

 70 47 49 104 292 (64)

Citi-branded cards

 199 6 NM 361 34 NM 
                           
 

Total

 $446 $357 25%$969 $1,344 (28)% 

Total

 $574 $279 NM $1,150 $527 NM 
                           

NM
Not meaningful

3Q092Q10 vs. 3Q082Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 9% drivenincreased 10%, reflecting higher cards purchase sales, investment sales, loan and deposit volumes, and the impact of FX translation, partially offset by spread compression in retail banking.

Net interest revenue was 8% higher than the absence of Visa assets sales gains in the 2008 third quarter, lower investment product revenues, lower loanprior-year period, mainly due to higher lending and deposit volumes and the impact of FX translation. Net interest revenue was 5% lower than the prior-year period. Average loans and deposits were down 9%up 15% and 1%11%, respectively, in each case primarilyrespectively. Spreads for branded cards remained relatively flat, while retail banking spreads declined marginally, due to mix and a continued low interest rate environment relative to the impact of FX translation. prior-year quarter.

Non-interest revenue declined increased 16%, primarily due to the decline inhigher investment revenues, lower Cards Purchasehigher cards purchase sales, the absence of Visa share sales gainshigher revenues from deposit products, and the impact of FX translation.

        Operating expenses declined 6%increased 12%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts andprimarily due to the impact of FX translation. Excluding the impact of FX translation, the increase was driven primarily by an increase in volumes and higher investment spending.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 3%73%, mainly due to the impact of lower credita $112 million loan loss reserve release in the current quarter, compared to a $156 million loan loss reserve build offset by an increasein the prior-year quarter, and a decrease in net credit losses andof 31%. These declines were partially offset by the impact of FX translation. RisingDelinquencies and net credit losses were particularly apparentcontinued to decline from their peak level in the portfolios in India and Korea. Compared to the second quarter of 2009 delinquencies improved and net credit losses flattened as thisthe region showed possible early signs ofbenefitted from continued economic recovery and increased levels of customer activity.activity, with India showing the most significant improvement. The cards net credit loss ratio decreased from 5.94% in the prior-year quarter to 3.90% in the current quarter. The retail banking net credit loss ratio decreased from 1.10% in the prior-year quarter to 0.61% in the current quarter.

3Q092Q10 YTD vs. 3Q082Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 15%increased 12%, driven by absence of Visa assetshigher cards purchase sales, gains, a 34% decline in investment sales lowerand loan and deposit volumes, and the impact of FX translation. translation, partially offset by spread compression in retail banking.

Net interest revenue was 8% lower9% higher than the prior-year period, reflectingmainly due to higher lending and deposit volumes and the impact of FX translation, offset by lower Average loans and deposits. spreads.


Table of Contents

Non-interest revenue declined 28% increased 23%, primarily due to the absence of Visa assethigher investment revenues, higher cards purchase sales, gains and the decline in investment sales.impact of FX translation.

        Operating expenses declined 14%increased 13%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts andprimarily due to the impact of FX translation.translation, increase in volumes and higher investment spending.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 39%decreased 62%, mainly due to higherthe impact of a net loan loss reserve release of $150 million in the first half of 2010, compared to a $351 million loan loss reserve build in the prior-year period, and a 19% decline in net credit losses in India and Korea and a higher credit reserve build.losses. These declines were partially offset by the impact of FX translation.


Table of Contents


INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS GROUP

Institutional Clients Group (ICG)
includesSecurities and Banking andTransaction Services.ICG provides corporate, institutional and ultra-high net worth clients with a full range of products and services, including cash management, trading, underwriting, lending and advisory services, around the world.ICG's international presence is supported by trading floors in approximately 75 countries and a proprietary network withinTransaction Services in over 95 countries. At June 30, 2010,ICG had approximately $944 billion of average assets and $427 billion of deposits.



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Commissions and Fees

 $565 $754 (25)%$1,500 $2,269 (34)%

Administration and Other Fiduciary Fees

 1,258 1,397 (10) 3,717 4,148 (10)

Commissions and fees

Commissions and fees

 $1,086 $1,019 7% 2,194 1,978 11%

Administration and other fiduciary fees

Administration and other fiduciary fees

 615 712 (14) 1,336 1,420 (6)

Investment banking

Investment banking

 1,063 740 44 3,245 3,005 8 

Investment banking

 592 1,240 (52) 1,545 2,181 (29)

Principal transactions

Principal transactions

 (535) 3,116 NM 7,699 8,065 (5)

Principal transactions

 1,632 880 85 4,976 7,830 (36)

Other

Other

 556 (188) NM 1,783 (107) NM 

Other

 564 699 (19) 925 1,046 (12)
                           

Total non-interest revenue

 $2,907 $5,819 (50)%$17,944 $17,380 3%

Total non-interest revenue

 $4,489 $4,550 (1)% 10,976 14,455 (24)%

Net interest revenue (including dividends)

 4,443 4,092 9 13,559 12,551 8 

Net interest revenue (including dividends)

 3,968 4,634 (14) 7,921 9,303 (15)
                           

Total revenues, net of interest expenses

 $7,350 $9,911 (26)%$31,503 $29,931 5%

Total revenues, net of interest expense

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $8,457 $9,184 (8)% 18,897 23,758 (20)%

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 4,634�� 4,919 (6) 12,883 16,169 (20)

Total operating expenses

 5,108 4,365 17 9,656 8,260 17 

Net credit losses

 292 221 32 537 595 (10)

Net credit losses

 43 169 (75) 145 246 (41)

Provisions for unfunded lending commitments

  (80) 100 115 (155) NM 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

 (22) 83 NM (29) 115 NM 

Credit reserve build (release)

 146 285 (49) 995 500 99 

Credit reserve build (release)

 (231) 612 NM (411) 924 NM 
             

Provisions for benefits and claims

       

Provision for credit losses

 $438 $426 3%$1,647 $940 75%
             

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $(210)$864 NM (295) 1,285 NM 
                           

Income from continuing operations before taxes

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $2,278 $4,566 (50)%$16,973 $12,822 32%

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $3,559 $3,955 (10)% 9,536 14,213 (33)%

Income taxes (benefits)

 584 1,410 (59) 5,340 3,907 37 

Income taxes

Income taxes

 940 1,143 (18) 2,770 4,361 (36)
                           

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 $1,694 $3,156 (46)%$11,633 $8,915 30%

Income from continuing operations

 $2,619 $2,812 (7)% 6,766 9,852 (31)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 23 11 NM 23 40 (43)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 20 3 NM 46   
                           

Net income

Net income

 $1,671 $3,145 (47)%$11,610 $8,875 31%

Net income

 $2,599 $2,809 (7)% 6,720 9,852 (32)%
                           

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $831 $953 (13)%$833 $1,062 (22)%

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $944 $835 13% 935 832 12%

Return on assets

Return on assets

 0.80% 1.31%   1.86% 1.12%   

Return on assets

 1.10% 1.35%   1.45% 2.39%   
                           

Revenue by region:

 

Revenues by region

Revenues by region

 

North America

 $1,955 $4,558 (57)%$10,342 $12,674 (18)%

North America

 $3,263 $2,377 37% 7,455 7,982 (7)%

EMEA

 3,043 2,348 30 11,523 7,882 46 

EMEA

 2,610 3,418 (24) 5,958 8,484 (30)

Latin America

 1,040 847 23 3,567 2,964 20 

Latin America

 914 1,389 (34) 1,865 2,532 (26)

Asia

 1,312 2,158 (39) 6,071 6,411 (5)

Asia

 1,670 2,000 (17) 3,619 4,760 (24)
                           

Total revenues

Total revenues

 $8,457 $9,184 (8)% 18,897 23,758 (20)%
 

Total

 $7,350 $9,911 (26)%$31,503 $29,931 5%              
             

Income (loss) from continuing operations by region:

 

Income from continuing operations by region

Income from continuing operations by region

 

North America

 $75 $1,434 (95)%$2,964 $3,611 (18)%

North America

 $1,005 $149 NM 2,588 2,784 (7)%

EMEA

 856 450 90 4,450 1,599 NM 

EMEA

 673 1,096 (39)% 2,011 3,593 (44)

Latin America

 364 386 (6) 1,595 1,304 22 

Latin America

 350 677 (48) 779 1,249 (38)

Asia

 399 886 (55) 2,624 2,401 9 

Asia

 591 890 (34) 1,388 2,226 (38)
                           

Total income from continuing operations

Total income from continuing operations

 $2,619 $2,812 (7)% 6,766 9,852 (31)%
 

Total

 $1,694 $3,156 (46)%$11,633 $8,915 30%              
             

Average loans by region(in billions):

 

Average loans by region(in billions of dollars)

Average loans by region(in billions of dollars)

 

North America

 $43 $52 (17)%       

North America

 $68 $55 24%       

EMEA

 42 49 (14)       

EMEA

 37 48 (23)       

Latin America

 21 24 (13)       

Latin America

 21 21        

Asia

 27 36 (25)       

Asia

 34 28 21       
                           

Total average loans

Total average loans

 $160 $152 5%       
 

Total

 $133 $161 (17)%                     
             

NM
Not meaningful


Table of Contents


SECURITIES AND BANKING

Securities and Banking (S&B) offers a wide array of investment and commercial banking services and products for corporations, governments, institutional and retail investors, and ultra-high net worth individuals.S&B includes investment banking and advisory services, lending, debt and equity sales and trading, institutional brokerage, foreign exchange, structured products, cash instruments and related derivatives, and private banking.S&B revenue is generated primarily from fees for investment banking and advisory services, fees and interest on loans, fees and spread on foreign exchange, structured products, cash instruments and related derivatives, income earned on principal transactions, and fees and spreads on private banking services.



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

Net interest revenue

 $3,050 $2,670 14%$9,305 $8,520 9%

Net interest revenue

 $2,570 $3,179 (19)%$5,135 $6,442 (20)%

Non-interest revenue

Non-interest revenue

 1,843 4,675 (61) 14,884 13,949 7 

Non-interest revenue

 3,385 3,522 (4) 8,823 12,459 (29)
                           

Revenues, net of interest expense

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $4,893 $7,345 (33)%$24,189 $22,469 8%

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $5,955 $6,701 (11)%$13,958 $18,901 (26)%

Operating expenses

 3,493 3,667 (5) 9,580 12,322 (22)

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 3,938 3,277 20 7,335 6,098 20 

Net credit losses

 294 223 32 539 593 (9)

Net credit losses

 42 172 (76) 143 246 (42)

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

  (74) 100 115 (149) NM 

Provisions for unfunded lending commitments

 (22) 83 NM (29) 115 NM 

Credit reserve build (release)

 151 288 (48) 994 494 NM 

Credit reserve build (release)

 (196) 604 NM (358) 918 NM 
             

Provisions for benefits and claims

       

Provision for credit losses

 $445 $437 2%$1,648 $938 76%
                           

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interest

 $955 $3,241 (71)%$12,961 $9,209 41%

Income taxes

 200 1,003 (80) 4,145 2,812 47 

Provisions for credit losses and benefits and claims

Provisions for credit losses and benefits and claims

 $(176)$859 NM $(244)$1,279 NM 
             

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interests

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interests

 $2,193 $2,565 (15)%$6,867 $11,524 (40)%

Income taxes (benefits)

Income taxes (benefits)

 508 727 (30) 1,976 3,550 (44)

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 755 2,238 (66) 8,816 6,397 38 

Income from continuing operations

 1,685 1,838 (8) 4,891 7,974 (39)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 18 2 NM 19 14 36 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 15   36 1 NM 
                           

Net income

Net income

 $737 $2,236 (67)%$8,797 $6,383 38%

Net income

 $1,670 $1,838 (9)%$4,855 $7,973 (39)%
                           

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $771 $883 (13)%$774 $990 (22)%

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $877 $776 13%$869 $773 12%

Return on assets

Return on assets

 0.38% 1.01%   1.52% 0.86%   

Return on assets

 0.76% 0.95%   1.13% 2.08%   
                           

Revenues by region:

 

Revenues by region

Revenues by region

 

North America

 $1,312 $4,018 (67)%$8,454 $11,117 (24)%

North America

 $2,627 $1,721 53%$6,180 $6,737 (8)%

EMEA

 2,198 1,395 58 8,974 5,098 76 

EMEA

 1,762 2,558 (31) 4,277 6,780 (37)

Latin America

 703 469 50 2,547 1,872 36 

Latin America

 558 1,049 (47) 1,165 1,849 (37)

Asia

 680 1,463 (54) 4,214 4,382 (4)

Asia

 1,008 1,373 (27) 2,336 3,535 (34)
                           

Total revenues

Total revenues

 $4,893 $7,345 (33)%$24,189 $22,469 8%

Total revenues

 $5,955 $6,701 (11)%$13,958 $18,901 (26)%
                           

Net income (loss) from continuing operations by region:

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations by region

Income (loss) from continuing operations by region

 

North America

 $(77)$1,340 NM $2,493 $3,368 (26)%

North America

 $839 (32) NM $2,263 $2,465 (8)%

EMEA

 548 102 NM 3,466 674 NM 

EMEA

 355 746 (52)% 1,387 2,917 (52)

Latin America

 216 227 (5)% 1,137 853 33 

Latin America

 197 527 (63) 469 939 (50)

Asia

 68 569 (88) 1,720 1,502 15 

Asia

 294 597 (51) 772 1,653 (53)
                           

Total net income from continuing operations

 $755 $2,238 (66)%$8,816 $6,397 38%

Total income from continuing operations

Total income from continuing operations

 $1,685 1,838 (8)%$4,891 $7,974 (39)%
                           

Securities and Banking

 

Securities and Banking revenue details

Securities and Banking revenue details

 

Revenue details:

 

Fixed income markets

 $3,713 5,569 (33)%$9,093 $15,592 (42)%

Net Investment Banking

 $1,163 $618 88%$3,305 $2,783 19%

Total investment banking

 674 1,161 (42) 1,731 2,144 (19)

Lending

 (699) 1,262 NM (1,956) 2,026 NM 

Equity markets

 652 1,101 (41) 1,865 2,706 (31)

Equity markets

 446 550 (19) 3,151 3,237 (3)

Lending

 522 (1,104) NM 765 (1,467) NM 

Fixed income markets

 3,945 4,756 (17) 19,739 13,927 42 

Private bank

 512 481 6 1,006 985 2 

Private bank

 520 563 (8) 1,496 1,789 (16)

Other Securities and Banking

 (118) (507) 77 (502) (1,059) 53 

Other Securities and Banking

 (482) (404) (19) (1,546) (1,293) (20)              

Total Securities and Banking revenues

Total Securities and Banking revenues

 $5,955 6,701 (11)%$13,958 $18,901 (26)%
                           

Total Securities and Banking Revenues

 $4,893 $7,345 (33)%$24,189 $22,469 8%
             

NM
Not meaningful

3Q092Q10 vs. 3Q082Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 33% or $2.5were $6.0 billion, compared to $4.9$6.7 billion mainlyin the prior-year quarter, resulting from revenue marks of negative $1.4 billion, set forth in greater detail below, and a decrease in fixed income markets, equity markets and investment banking revenues, partially offset by an increase in lending revenues of $2.0 billion to negative $699 million (mainly from losses on credit derivative positions).and private bank revenues. Fixed income markets revenues (excluding credit value adjustment (CVA), net of hedges, of $0.2 billion and $(0.2) billion in the current period and prior-year quarter, respectively) declined $811$2.3 billion to $3.5 billion, with a majority of the decline coming from weaker results in Credit Products and Securitized Products, which reflected a challenging market environment. Equity markets revenues (excluding CVA of $32 million and $(0.7) billion in the current period and prior-year quarter, respectively) declined $1.2 billion to $0.6 billion, driven by lower results in Derivatives, reflecting lower market and client volumes, and increased volatility. CVA increased $1.2 billion to $0.3 billion, mainly due to a widening of Citigroup spreads throughout the current quarter, compared to a contraction in the prior-year quarter. Investment banking revenues


Table of Contents

decreased $0.5 billion to $0.7 billion, also reflecting lower client market activity levels. Debt and equity underwriting revenues declined, reflecting lower overall issuance volumes, and advisory revenues decreased due to fewer completed deals, as a number of anticipated closings were moved out of the second quarter of 2010. Lending revenues increased from $(1.1) billion to $0.5 billion, driven by gains from spread widening on credit default swap hedges.

Operating expenses increased 20% to $3.9 billion, mainly driven by the U.K. bonus tax of approximately $400 million. Expenses in the current quarter also reflected select investments in the businesses.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased by $1.0 billion to $(176) million, primarily attributable to the impact of a $218 million credit reserve release in the current quarter, compared to a $687 million build in the prior-year quarter, as improvements continued in the corporate loan portfolio.

2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, were $14.0 billion, compared to $18.9 billion for the prior-year period, which was driven by a particularly strong 2009 first half due to negative credit value adjustments of $760 million (mainly due to narrowing in Citigroup spreads,robust fixed income markets and CVA. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in lending revenues, due to gains from spread widening on credit default swap hedges.

Operating expenses increased 20% to $7.3 billion, mainly driven by the narrowingU.K. bonus tax, higher transaction and compensation costs, and a litigation reserve release in the first half of counterparty spreads),2009.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased by $1.5 billion to $(244) million, primarily attributable to the impact of a $387 million credit reserve release in the first half of 2010, compared to positive credit value adjustments of $2.6a $1.0 billion build in the third quarterprior-year period, as improvements continued in the corporate loan portfolio.


Table of 2008, partiallyContents


TRANSACTION SERVICES

Transaction Services is composed of Treasury and Trade Solutions (TTS) and Securities and Fund Services (SFS). TTS provides comprehensive cash management and trade finance for corporations, financial institutions and public sector entities worldwide. SFS provides custody and funds services to investors such as insurance companies and mutual funds, clearing services to intermediaries such as broker-dealers, and depository and agency/trust services to multinational corporations and governments globally. Revenue is generated from net interest revenue on deposits in TTS and SFS, as well as from trade loans and from fees for transaction processing and fees on assets under custody in SFS.

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $1,398 $1,455  (4)%$2,786 $2,861  (3)%

Non-interest revenue

  1,104  1,028  7  2,153  1,996  8 
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $2,502 $2,483  1%$4,939 $4,857  2%

Total operating expenses

  1,170  1,088  8  2,321  2,162  7 

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

  (34) 5  NM  (51) 6  NM 
              

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interests

 $1,366 $1,390  (2)%$2,669 $2,689  (1)%

Income taxes

  432  416  4  794  811  (2)

Income from continuing operations

  934  974  (4) 1,875  1,878   

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  5  3  67  10  (1) NM 
              

Net income

 $929 $971  (4)%$1,865 $1,879  (1)%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $67 $59  14%$66 $59  12%

Return on assets

  5.56% 6.60%    5.70% 6.42%   
              

Revenues by region

                   
 

North America

 $636 $656  (3)%$1,275 $1,245  2%
 

EMEA

  848  860  (1) 1,681  1,704  (1)
 

Latin America

  356  340  5  700  683  2 
 

Asia

  662  627  6  1,283  1,225  5 
              

Total revenues

 $2,502 $2,483  1%$4,939 $4,857  2%
              

Revenue Details

                   
 

Treasury and Trade Solutions

 $1,805 $1,793  1%$3,586 $3,543  1%
 

Securities and Fund Services

  697  690  1  1,353  1,314  3 
              

Total revenues

 $2,502 $2,483  1%$4,939 $4,857  2%
              

Income from continuing operations by region

                   
 

North America

 $166 $181  (8)%$325 $319  2%
 

EMEA

  318  350  (9) 624  676  (8)
 

Latin America

  153  150  2  310  310   
 

Asia

  297  293  1  616  573  8 
              

Total income from continuing operations

 $934 $974  (4)%$1,875 $1,878   
              

Key indicators(in billions of dollars)

                   

Average deposits and other customer liability balances

 $320 $288  11%         

EOP assets under custody(in trillions of dollars)

  11.3  11.4  (1)         
              

NM
Not meaningful

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

Revenues, net of interest expense, grew 1%, as improvement in fees in both the TTS and SFS businesses more than offset spread compression. TTS revenue increased 1%, driven primarily by stronger performances across most fixed income categories as market conditions improved. Equity marketsgrowth in Trade and Cards businesses. SFS revenues declined $104 million or 19% primarilyincreased 1%, driven by negative credit value adjustments of $878 million, offset by stronger results in proprietary tradinghigher volumes and derivatives. Investment banking revenues increased $545 million, led by stronger high yield and investment grade debt issuances in debt underwriting, and stronger volumes in equity underwriting, with a decline in advisory revenues resulting from lower global M&Aclient activity.

        Operating expenses decreased 5% or $174 millionincreased 8%, primarily due to $3.5 billion, mainly driven by lower severancecontinued investment spending required to support future business growth, as well as higher transaction-related costs and the benefit of FX translation, offset partially by an increase in compensation costs.U.K. bonus tax.

        Provisions for creditloan losses and for benefits and claims increaseddeclined by 2% or $8$39 million, primarily attributable to $445 million, mainly from higher neta credit losses and areserve release of provisions for unfunded lending commitments in the prior-year period, offset partially by lower credit reserve builds.$35 million.

3Q092Q10 YTD vs. 3Q082Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, grew 2% as improvement in fees in both the TTS and SFS businesses more than offset spread compression. TTS revenue increased 8% or $1.7 billion, mainly1%, driven primarily by growth in Trade and Cards businesses. SFS revenues increased 3%, driven by higher volumes and client activity.

Operating expenses increased 7%, primarily due to an increase in fixed income marketscontinued investment spending required to support future business growth, as well as higher transaction related costs and the U.K. bonus tax.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims declined by $57 million, primarily attributable to a credit reserve release of $5.8 billion to $19.7 billion reflecting strong trading results, particularly in the first and second quarters of 2009, offset partially by a decrease in lending revenues of $4.0 billion to$53 million.


Table of Contents

negative $2.0
CITI HOLDINGS

        Citi Holdings contains businesses and portfolios of assets that Citigroup has determined are not central to its core Citicorp businesses. These noncore businesses tend to be more asset intensive and reliant on wholesale funding and also may be product-driven rather than client-driven. Citi intends to exit these businesses as quickly as practicable in an economically rational manner through business divestitures, portfolio run-offs and asset sales. Citi has made substantial progress divesting and exiting businesses from Citi Holdings, having completed more than 20 divestiture transactions since the beginning of 2009 through June 30, 2010, including Smith Barney, Nikko Cordial Securities, Nikko Asset Management, Primerica Financial Services, Credit Card businesses and Diners Club North America. Citi Holdings' GAAP assets have been reduced by approximately 20%, or $117 billion, (mainly from lossesthe second quarter of 2009, and 44% from the peak in the first quarter of 2008. Citi Holdings' GAAP assets of $465 billion represent approximately 24% of Citi's assets as of June 30, 2010. Citi Holdings' risk-weighted assets of approximately $400 billion represent approximately 40% of Citi's risk-weighted assets as of June 30, 2010. Asset reductions from Citi Holdings have the combined benefits of further fortifying Citigroup's capital base, lowering risk, simplifying the organization and allowing Citi to allocate capital to fund long-term strategic businesses.

        Citi Holdings consists of the following businesses:Brokerage and Asset Management, Local Consumer Lending, andSpecial Asset Pool.

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $3,971 $4,162  (5)%$8,346 $9,219  (9)%

Non-interest revenue

  948  11,163  (92) 3,123  9,200  (66)
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $4,919 $15,325  (68)%$11,469 $18,419  (38)%
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

                   

Net credit losses

 $4,998 $6,781  (26)%$10,239 $12,808  (20)%

Credit reserve build (release)

  (800) 2,645  NM  (460) 4,282  NM 
              

Provision for loan losses

 $4,198 $9,426  (55)%$9,779 $17,090  (43)%

Provision for benefits and claims

  185  267  (31) 428  557  (23)

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

  (45) 52  NM  (71) 80  NM 
              

Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $4,338 $9,745  (55)%$10,136 $17,727  (43)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $2,424 $3,609  (33)%$4,998 $7,794  (36)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(1,843)$1,971  NM $(3,665)$(7,102) 48%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (646) 789  NM  (1,592) (2,799) 43 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(1,197)$1,182  NM $(2,073)$(4,303) 52%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  8  (37) NM  19  (48) NM 
              

Net income (loss)

 $(1,205)$1,219  NM $(2,092)$(4,255) 51%
              

Balance sheet data(in billions of dollars)

                   

Total EOP assets

 $465 $582  (20)%         
              

Total EOP deposits

 $82 $84  (2)%         
              

Total GAAP Revenues

 $4,919 $15,325  (68)%$11,469 $18,419  (38)%
 

Net Impact of Credit Card Securitization Activity(1)

    1,482  NM    2,450  NM 
              

Total Managed Revenues

 $4,919 $16,807  (71)%$11,469 $20,869  (45)%
              

GAAP Net Credit Losses

 $4,998 $6,781  (26)%$10,239 $12,808  (20)%
 

Impact of Credit Card Securitization Activity(1)

    1,278  NM    2,335  NM 
              

Total Managed Net Credit Losses

 $4,998 $8,059  (38)%$10,239 $15,143  (32)%
              

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on credit default swap hedges).page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NM
Not meaningful

Table of Contents


BROKERAGE AND ASSET MANAGEMENT

Brokerage and Asset Management (BAM), which constituted approximately 6% of Citi Holdings by assets as of June 30, 2010, consists of Citi's global retail brokerage and asset management businesses. This segment was substantially affected by, and reduced in size in 2009, due to the sale of Smith Barney (SB) to the MSSB JV and Nikko Cordial Securities. At June 30, 2010,BAM had approximately $30 billion of assets, primarily consisting of Citi's investment in, and assets related to, the MSSB JV. Morgan Stanley has options to purchase Citi's remaining stake in the MSSB JV over three years starting in 2012.

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $(71)$162  NM $(136)$526  NM 

Non-interest revenue

  212  12,058  (98)% 617  13,301  (95)%
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $141 $12,220  (99)%$481 $13,827  (97)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $258 $1,044  (75)%$523 $2,543  (79)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $1 $   $12 $   
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  (3) 3  NM  (10) 46  NM 
 

Provision for benefits and claims

  9  8  13% 18  19  (5)%
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

  (6)     (6)    
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $1 $11  (91)%$14 $65  (78)%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $(118)$11,165  NM $(56)$11,219  (100)%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (30) 4,390  NM  (49) 4,410  NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $(88)$6,775  NM $(7)$6,809  (100)%

Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  7  6  17% 2  (11) NM 
              

Net income (loss)

 $(95)$6,769  NM $(9)$6,820  (100)%
              

EOP assets(in billions of dollars)

 $30 $51  (41)%         

EOP deposits(in billions of dollars)

  57  56  2          
              

NM    Not meaningful

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 99% primarily due to the absence of the $11.1 billion pre-tax gain on sale ($6.7 billion after-tax) on the sale of SB which closed on June 1, 2009. Excluding the gain, revenue declined $1.0 billion, or 88%, driven primarily by the absence of SB revenues.

        Operating expenses decreased 22% or $2.7 billion driven by lower compensation75% from the prior-year quarter, mainly due to headcount reductions and benefits from re-engineering and expense management.the absence of SB expenses.

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased 76% or $710 million to $1.6 billiondeclined 91%, mainly from increased creditreflecting lower reserve builds on funded loansof $6 million and higherlower provisions for unfunded lending commitments.commitments of $6 million.

Assets declined 41% versus the prior year, primarily driven by the sale of Nikko Cordial Securities and Nikko Asset Management.

Third Quarter Revenue Impacting Citicorp—Securities and Banking2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

        While notRevenues, net of interest expense, decreased 97% primarily due to the absence of the $11.1 billion pre-tax gain on the sale of SB ($6.7 billion after-tax) which closed on June 1, 2009. Excluding the gain, revenue declined $2.3 billion, or 83%, driven primarily by the absence of SB revenues.

Operating expenses decreased 79% from the prior-year period, primarily driven by the absence of expenses from the SB and Nikko businesses.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims declined 78% primarily due to lower reserve builds of $56 million, partially offset by increased net credit losses of $12 million.


Table of Contents


LOCAL CONSUMER LENDING

Local Consumer Lending (LCL), which constituted approximately 70% of Citi Holdings by assets as significantof June 30, 2010, includes a portion of Citigroup's North American mortgage business, retail partner cards, Western European cards and retail banking, CitiFinancial North America, Student Loan Corporation and other local consumer finance businesses globally. At June 30, 2010,LCL had $323 billion of assets ($294 billion inNorth America). Approximately $143 billion of assets inLCL as of June 30, 2010 consisted of U.S. mortgages in prior quarters, certain items continuedthe company's CitiMortgage and CitiFinancial operations. The North American assets consist of residential mortgage loans (first and second mortgages), retail partner card loans, student loans, personal loans, auto loans, commercial real estate, and other consumer loans and assets.

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $3,688 $3,185  16%$7,708 $6,889  12%

Non-interest revenue

  518  296  75  1,168  2,613  (55)
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense(1)

 $4,206 $3,481  21%$8,876 $9,502  (7)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $2,046 $2,376  (14)%$4,224 $4,846  (13)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $4,535 $5,144  (12)%$9,473 $9,661  (2)%
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  (421) 2,784  NM  (35) 4,346  NM 
 

Provision for benefits and claims

  176  259  (32) 410  538  (24)
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

             
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $4,290 $8,187  (48)%$9,848 $14,545  (32)%
              

Income (Loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(2,130)$(7,082) 70%$(5,196)$(9,889) 47%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (900) (2,735) 67  (2,128) (3,971) 46 
              

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $(1,230)$(4,347) 72%$(3,068)$(5,918) 48%

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  7  5  40  7  11  (36)
              

Net income (loss)

 $(1,237)$(4,352) 72%$(3,075)$(5,929) 48%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $333 $358  (7)%$344 $363  (5)%
              

Net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans(2)

  6.03% 7.48%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

International

 $444 $689  (36)%$779 $2,713  (71)%
 

Retail Partner Cards

  2,113  789  NM  4,319  2,316  86 
 

North America (ex Cards)

  1,649  2,003  (18) 3,778  4,473  (16)
              
  

Total GAAP Revenues

 $4,206 $3,481  21%$8,876 $9,502  (7)%
 

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

    1,482  NM    2,450  NM 
              
 

Total Managed Revenues

 $4,206 $4,963  (15)%$8,876 $11,952  (26)%
              

Net Credit Losses by business

                   
 

International

 $495 $962  (49)%$1,107 $1,780  (38)%
 

Retail partner cards

  1,775  872  NM  3,707  1,773  NM 
 

North America (ex Cards)

  2,265  3,310  (32) 4,659  6,108  (24)
              
  

Total GAAP net credit losses

 $4,535 $5,144  (12)%$9,473 $9,661  (2)%
 

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

    1,278  NM    2,335  NM 
              
 

Total Managed Net Credit Losses

 $4,535 $6,422  (29)%$9,473 $11,996  (21)%
              

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)
See "Managed Presentations" below.

NM    Not meaningful

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 21%, due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167, partially offset by lower balances due to portfolio run-off, asset sales and divestitures, and a higher mortgage repurchase reserve. Net interest revenue increased 16%, primarily due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167, partially offset by the impact Securitiesof lower balances.

Operating expenses declined 14%, due to the impact of divestitures, lower volumes, re-engineering benefits and Banking revenues during the thirdabsence of costs associated with the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, which was exited in the fourth quarter of 2009. These items are set forthwere partially offset by higher restructuring expense in the table below.current quarter due to the previously announced restructuring of Citi Financial.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 48% from the prior quarter, reflecting a reserve release of $421 million, principally related to U.S. retail partner cards, in the current quarter, compared to a reserve build in the prior-year quarter of $2.8 billion. Lower net credit losses were partially offset by the impact of the adoption of SFAS 166/167. On a managed basis, net credit losses declined for the fourth consecutive quarter, driven by improvement in the international portfolios as well as U.S. mortgages and retail partner cards.

Assets declined 7% versus the prior year, primarily driven by portfolio run-off, higher loan loss reserve balances, and the impact of asset sales, partially offset by an increase of $41 billion resulting from the adoption of SFAS 166/167.


Table of Contents

2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 7% from the prior-year period. Net interest revenue increased 12% due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167, partially offset by the impact of lower balances due to portfolio run-off and asset sales. Non-interest revenue declined 55%, primarily due to the absence of the $1.1 billion gain on sale of Redecard in first quarter of 2009 and a higher mortgage repurchase reserve in the second quarter.

Operating expenses decreased 13%, primarily due to the impact of divestitures, lower volumes, re-engineering actions and the absence of costs associated with the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, which was exited in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 32%, reflecting a net $35 million reserve release in the first half of 2010 compared to a $4.3 billion build in the comparable period of 2009. Lower net credit losses across most businesses were partially offset by the impact of the adoption of SFAS 166/167. On a managed basis, net credit losses were lower, driven by improvement in the international portfolios, as well as U.S. mortgages and retail partner cards.

Assets declined 5% versus the prior-year period, primarily driven by portfolio run-off, higher loan loss reserve balances, and the impact of asset sales and divestitures, partially offset by an increase of $41 billion resulting from the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

Managed Presentations

 
 Pretax Revenue
(in millions)
 
 
 Third
Quarter
2009
 Third
Quarter
2008
 

Private Equity and equity investments

 $79 $(50)

Alt-A Mortgages(1)(2)

  142  (221)

Commercial Real Estate (CRE) positions(1)(3)

  20  130 

CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option

  (955) 1,526 

CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers

  (722) 1,178 
      

Total significant revenue items

 $(1,436)$2,563 
      
 
 Second Quarter 
 
 2010 2009 

Managed credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans

  6.03% 7.48%

Impact from credit card securitizations(1)

    (0.74)
      

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

  6.03% 6.74%
      

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents


SPECIAL ASSET POOL

Special Asset Pool (SAP), which constituted approximately 24% of Citi Holdings by assets as of June 30, 2010, is a portfolio of securities, loans and other assets that Citigroup intends to actively reduce over time through asset sales and portfolio run-off. At June 30, 2010,SAP had $112 billion of assets.SAP assets have declined by $216 billion, or 66%, from peak levels in the fourth quarter of 2007, reflecting cumulative asset sales, write-downs and portfolio run-off.

 
 Second Quarter  
 Six Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $354 $815  (57)%$774 $1,804  (57)%

Non-interest revenue

  218  (1,191) NM  1,338  (6,714) NM 
              

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $572 $(376) NM $2,112 $(4,910) NM 
              

Total operating expenses

 $120 $189  (37)%$251 $405  (38)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $462 $1,637  (72)%$754 $3,147  (76)%
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

  (39) 52  NM  (65) 80  NM 
 

Credit reserve builds (release)

  (376) (142) NM  (415) (110) NM 
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $47 $1,547  (97)%$274 $3,117  (91)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $405 $(2,112) NM $1,587 $(8,432) NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  284  (866) NM  585  (3,238) NM 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $121 $(1,246) NM $1,002 $(5,194) NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (6) (48) 88% 10  (48) NM 
              

Net income (loss)

 $127 $(1,198) NM $992 $(5,146) NM 
              

EOP assets(in billions of dollars)

 $112 $180  (38)%         
              

NM
Not meaningful

2Q10 vs. 2Q09

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $948 million, driven by an improvement in net revenue marks, partially offset by recording $176 million of negative revenues ($70 million of which were included in the net revenue marks) as a result of the reclassifying assets in held-to-maturity to fair value (see "Second Quarter 2010 Executive Summary" above and "Reclassification of Held-to-Maturity Securities to Available-for-Sale" below). Revenues in the current quarter included positive marks of $1.0 billion on subprime-related direct exposures and non-credit accretion of $383 million, partially offset by write-downs on commercial real estate of $174 million and on Alt-A mortgages of $163 million.

Operating expenses decreased 37% driven by the absence of the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, exited in the fourth quarter of 2009, and lower tax charges and compensation.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 97%, primarily driven by lower net credit losses of $1.2 billion and a larger reserve release of $234 million.

Assets declined 38% versus the prior-year quarter due to asset sales (including approximately $8 billion primarily through CDO liquidations), amortization and prepayments, partially offset by the impact of the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $7.0 billion primarily due to favorable net revenue marks relative to the prior-year period. Revenue year-to-date includes positive marks of $1.9 billion on subprime-related direct exposures and non-credit accretion of $778 million, partially offset by write-downs on commercial real estate of $232 million and on Alt-A mortgages of $327 million.

Operating expenses decreased 38% mainly driven by lower volumes, lower transaction expenses, and the absence of the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, exited in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 91%, primarily driven by a $2.4 billion decrease in net credit losses versus the prior-year period and higher reserve releases of $304 million.


Table of Contents

        The following table provides details of the composition ofSAP assets as of June 30, 2010.

 
 Assets within Special Asset Pool as of
June 30, 2010
 
In billions of dollars Carrying
value
of assets
 Face value Carrying value
as % of face
value
 

Securities in Available-for-Sale (AFS)

          
 

Corporates

 $7.7 $7.8  98%
 

Prime and non-U.S. mortgage-backed securities (MBS)

  7.1  8.6  83 
 

Auction rate securities (ARS)

  6.2  8.6  72 
 

Other securities(1)

  5.3  7.0  76 
 

Alt-A mortgages

  0.6  1.3  46 
        

Total securities in AFS

 $27.0 $33.3  81%
        

Securities in Held-to-Maturity (HTM)

          
 

Prime and non-U.S. MBS

 $8.3 $10.4  81%
 

Alt-A mortgages

  9.4  18.2  52 
 

Corporate securities

  6.1  7.0  87 
 

ARS

  1.0  1.2  78 
 

Other securities(2)

  3.3  4.3  76 
        

Total securities in HTM

 $28.1 $41.0  68%
        

Loans, leases and letters of credit (LCs) in Held-for-Investment (HFI)/Held-for-Sale (HFS)(3)

          
 

Corporates

 $11.1 $12.1  92%
 

Commercial real estate (CRE)

  8.0  8.9  90 
 

Other

  2.1  2.5  82 
 

Loan loss reserves

  (3.2)   NM 
        

Total loans, leases and LCs in HFI/HFS

 $18.0 $23.4  77%
        

Mark to market

          
 

Subprime securities

 $0.8 $4.9  17%
 

Other securities(4)

  5.8  29.5  20 
 

Derivatives

  7.2  NM  NM 
 

Loans, leases and letters of credit

  3.7  5.4  67 
 

Repurchase agreements

  6.2  NM  NM 
        

Total mark-to-market

 $23.7  NM  NM 
        

Highly leveraged finance commitments

 $2.0 $3.2  62%

Equities (excludes ARS in AFS)

  5.9  NM  NM 

Monolines

  0.4  NM  NM 

Consumer and other(5)

  6.7  NM  NM 
        

Total

 $111.7       
        

(1)
Includes assets previously held by Citi-advised structured investment vehicles (SIVs) that are not otherwise included in the categories above ($3.1 billion of asset-backed securities (ABS), collateralized debt obligations (CDO)/CLOs and government bonds), ABS ($1.0 billion) and municipals ($0.9 billion).

(2)
Includes assets previously held by Citi-advised SIVs that are not otherwise included in the categories above ($2.3 billion of ABS, CDOs/CLOs and government bonds).

(3)
HFS accounts for approximately $1.4 billion of the total.

(4)
Includes $1.4 billion of corporate securities.

(5)
Includes $1.7 billion of small business banking and finance loans and $1.0 billion of personal loans.

Notes: Assets previously held by the Citi-advised SIVs have been allocated to the corresponding asset categories above.SAP had total CRE assets of $11.3 billion at June 30, 2010.

Excludes Discontinued Operations.

Totals may not sum due to rounding.

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents

Items Impacting SAP Revenues

        The table below provides additional information regarding the net revenue marks affecting theSAP during the second quarters of 2010 and 2009.

 
 Pretax revenue 
In millions of dollars Second
Quarter
2010
 Second
Quarter
2009
 

Subprime-related direct exposures(1)

 $1,046 $613 

CVA related to exposure to monoline insurers

  35  157 

Alt-A mortgages(2)(3)

  (163) (390)

CRE positions(2)(4)

  (174) (213)

CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers(2)

  (54) 219 

SIV assets

  (123) 50 

Private equity and equity investments

  31  (73)

Highly leveraged loans and financing commitments(5)

    (237)

ARS proprietary positions(6)

  (8)  

CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option

  8  (156)
      

Subtotal

 $598 $(31)

Accretion on reclassified assets(7)

  383  501 
      

Total selected revenue items

 $981 $470 
      

(1)
Net of impact from hedges against direct subprime ABS CDO super senior positions.

(2)
Net of hedges.

(2)(3)
For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency residential mortgage-backed securitiesMBS (RMBS) where (i) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (ii) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral composed of full documentation loans. See "Loan and Credit Details—U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending."

(3)(4)
SecuritiesExcludes CRE positions in SIV assets.

(5)
Net of underwriting fees.

(6)
Excludes write-downs of $2 million and Banking's commercial real estate exposure is split into three categories of assets: held at fair value; held to maturity/held for investment; and equity. See "Exposure to Commercial Real Estate" below for a further discussion.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Citi's Debt Liabilities for Which Citi Has Elected$3 million in the Fair Value Option

        The Company is required to use its own credit spreads in determining the current value of its derivative liabilities and all other liabilities for which it has elected the fair value option. When Citi's credit spreads widen (deteriorate), Citi recognizes a gain on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has decreased. When Citi's credit spreads narrow (improve), Citi recognizes a loss on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has increased. The approximately $955 million of losses recorded by Securities and Banking on its fair value option liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) during the thirdsecond quarter of 2010 and 2009, was principally due to the narrowing (improving) of the Company's credit spreads.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Derivative Positions, excluding Monoline insurers

        The approximately $722 million of pretax losses recorded by Securities and Banking on its derivative positions during the third quarter of 2009 was due to the narrowing of the Company's credit default swap spreads on its derivative liabilities. These losses were partially offset by gains due to the narrowing of the credit spreads of the Company's counterparties on its derivative assets. See "Derivatives—Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives" below for a further discussion.


Table of Contents


TRANSACTION SERVICES

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $1,393 $1,422  (2)%$4,254 $4,031  6%

Non-interest revenue

  1,064  1,144  (7) 3,060  3,431  (11)
              

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $2,457 $2,566  (4)%$7,314 $7,462  (2)%

Operating expenses

  1,141  1,252  (9) 3,303  3,847  (14)

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  (7) (11) 36  (1) 2  NM 
              

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interest

 $1,323 $1,325   $4,012 $3,613  11%

Income taxes

  384  407  (6)% 1,195  1,095  9 

Income from continuing operations

  939  918  2  2,817  2,518  12 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  5  9  (44) 4  26  (85)
              

Net income

 $934 $909  3%$2,813 $2,492  13%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $60 $70  (14)%$59 $72  (18)%

Return on assets

  6.18% 5.17%    6.37% 4.62%   
              

Revenues by region:

                   
 

North America

 $643 $540  19%$1,888 $1,557  21%
 

EMEA

  845  953  (11) 2,549  2,784  (8)
 

Latin America

  337  378  (11) 1,020  1,092  (7)
 

Asia

  632  695  (9) 1,857  2,029  (8)
              

Total revenues

 $2,457 $2,566   $7,314 $7,462  (2)%
              

Net income (loss) from continuing operations by region:

                   
 

North America

 $152 $94  62%$471 $243  94%
 

EMEA

  308  348  (11) 984  925  6 
 

Latin America

  148  159  (7) 458  451  2 
 

Asia

  331  317  4  904  899  1 
              

Total net income from continuing operations

 $939 $918  2%$2,817 $2,518  12%
              

Key Indicators(in billions of dollars)

                   

Average deposits and other customer liability balances

 $314 $273  15%         

EOP assets under custody(in trillions of dollars)

 $11.8 $11.9  (1)         
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, were $2.5 billion, down $109 million or 4%respectively, from strong prior-year performance due to spread compression (as global rates declined) and lower volumes as well as negative foreign exchange impact. This was partly offset by strong growth in liability balances and higher trade fees.

Operating expenses declined 9% or $111 million to $1.1 billion, driven by headcount reductions, re-engineering efforts, expense management initiatives and a benefit from FX translation.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, of $7.3 billion decreased slightly from the prior period driven primarily by the impact of lower fee revenues and negative foreign exchange. Average liability balances grew 6% driven by strong growth in North America as a result of successful implementation of deposit growth strategy.

Operating expenses declined 14%, driven by headcount reduction and re-engineering benefits.


Table of Contents


CITI HOLDINGS

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 
 

Net interest revenue

 $4,024 $5,766  (30)%$13,902 $17,292  (20)%
 

Non-interest revenue

  2,670  (5,062) NM  11,994  (19,027) NM 
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $6,694 $704  NM $25,896 $(1,735) NM 
              

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

                   
 

Net credit losses

 $6,250 $3,603  73%$19,090 $9,332  NM 
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  338  3,224  (90) 4,743  6,790  (30)%
              
 

Provision for loan losses

 $6,588 $6,827  (4)%$23,833 $16,122  48%
 

Provision for benefits & claims

  310  273  14  923  805  15 
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

    (70) 100  80  (138) NM 
              
 

Total provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $6,898 $7,030  (2)%$24,836 $16,789  48%
              

Total operating expenses

 $3,202 $5,136  (38)%$11,417 $16,406  (30)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(3,406)$(11,462) 70%$(10,357)$(34,930) 70%

Provision (benefits) for income taxes

  (1,588) (4,526) 65  (4,562) (13,619) 67 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(1,818)$(6,936) 74%$(5,795)$(21,311) 73%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  49  (109) NM  (1) (87) 99 
              

Citi Holding's net income (loss)

 $(1,867)$(6,827) 73%$(5,794)$(21,224) 73%
              

Balance Sheet Data (in billions)

                   

Total EOP assets

 $617 $775  (20)%         

Total EOP deposits

  90  83  8          
              

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents


BROKERAGE AND ASSET MANAGEMENT

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $(56)$318  NM $460 $727  (37)%

Non-interest revenue

  726  1,776  (59)% 14,250  6,224  NM 
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $670 $2,094  (68)%$14,710 $6,951  NM 
              

Total operating expenses

 $358 $2,085  (83)%$3,000 $6,537  (54)%
              
  

Net credit losses

   $1  (100)%$3 $11  (73)%
  

Credit reserve build (release)

 $(11) (3) NM  35  7  NM 
  

Provision for benefits and claims

  38  58  (34) 113  155  (27)
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $27 $56  (52)%$151 $173  (13)%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $285 $(47) NM $11,559 $241  NM 

Income taxes

  146  10  NM  4,548  145  NM 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $139 $(57) NM $7,011 $96  NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  16  (98) NM  5  (60) NM 
              

Net income

 $123 $41  NM $7,006 $156  NM 
              

EOP assets(in billions of dollars)

 $59 $62  (5)%         

EOP deposits (in billions of dollars)

  60 $53  13          
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 68% primarily driven by the decrease in the Company's share of Smith Barney revenue resulting from the joint venture transaction. Revenues in the prior-year period included a $347 million pre-tax gain on sale of CitiStreet and charges related to settlementbuy-backs of auction rate securities (ARS) of $306 million pre-tax. 2009 third quarter revenue includes a $320 million pre-tax gain on the sale of the Managed Futures business to the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture.

Operating expenses decreased 83% from the prior-year period, mainly driven by the absence of Smith Barney expenses and the absence of restructuring expenses in retail alternative investments.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased by 52% mainly reflecting lower provisions for benefits and claims.

End of Period Assets include approximately $24 billion of assets of discontinued operations held for sale.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $7.8 billion due to an $11.1 billion pre-tax gain on sale ($6.7 billion after-tax) on the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture transaction, which closed on June 1, 2009. Excluding the gain, revenues declined $3.3 billion driven by the absence of Smith Barney revenues.

(7)
Recorded as well as the impact of market conditions on Smith Barney transactional and fee-based revenue compared to the prior year.

Operating expenses decreased $3.5 billion primarily driven by the absence of Smith Barney expenses, lower variable compensation and re-engineering efforts, particularly in retail alternative investments.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims declined 13% mainly reflecting lower provisions for benefits and claims.


Table of Contents


LOCAL CONSUMER LENDING

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $3,453 $4,612  (25)%$10,730 $14,015  (23)%

Non-interest revenue

  1,194  820  46  4,300  5,141  (16)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $4,647 $5,432  (14)%$15,030 $19,156  (22)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $2,611 $2,847  (8)%$7,746 $9,094  (15)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $4,929 $3,487  41%$14,617 $9,116  60%
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  604  2,702  (78) 5,003  5,858  (15)
 

Provision for benefits and claims

  272  215  27  810  650  25 
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $5,805 $6,404  (9)%$20,430 $15,624  31%
              

Loss from continuing operations before taxes

 $(3,769)$(3,819) 1%$(13,146)$(5,562) NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  (1,670) (1,534) (9) (5,435) (2,196) NM 
              

Loss from continuing operations

 $(2,099)$(2,285) 8%$(7,711)$(3,366) NM 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  13  1  NM  23  13  77%
              

Net loss

 $(2,112)$(2,286) 8%$(7,734)$(3,379) NM 
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $384 $456  (16)%$397 $471  (16)%

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  6.11% 3.83%            
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 14% due to lower net interest margin, partially offset by increased Cards securitization revenues of $0.7 billion.Net interest revenue was 25% lower than the prior year due to lower balances and the impact of delinquencies and loan modifications in Real Estate, North America Consumer Finance, and Cards. Net interest revenue as a percent of average loans decreased 98 basis points from the prior-year quarter in North America (ex Cards) and decreased 99 basis points in International, due principally to volume decreases. Average loans decreased 12%, with North America (ex Cards) down 10%, North America Cards down 19%, and International down 19%.Non-interest revenue increased 46% reflecting the increased revenue from Cards securitization.

Operating expenses declined 8% primarily due to lower volumes and reductions from expense re-engineering actions, partially offset by higher real estate owned (OREO) and collection costs.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 9% from the prior period reflecting lower reserve builds of $2.1 billion, partially offset by increased net credit losses of $1.4 billion, primarily in Real Estate and EMEA. The credit reserve build for the quarter included $350 million related to the UK Cards portfolio which was transferred to held-for-sale. The net credit loss ratio increased 228 basis points from the prior-year quarter with North America (ex Cards) up 184 basis points to 4.78%, International up 375 basis points to 9.77%, and North America Cards up 575 basis points to 14.58%.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 22% due to a decline in net interest revenue, higher net credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts in North America and a higher FDIC assessment.Net interest revenue was 23% lower than the prior year driven by lower balances (due to run-off and credit tightening) and spread compression due largely to higher non-accrual loans, the higher FDIC assessment and the impact of loan modifications.Non-interest revenue declined 16% primarily due to higher credit costs flowing through the securitization trusts in North America and lower securitization gains. Year-to-date non-interest revenue for 2009 also included a $1.1 billion pretax gain on the sale of the Company's remaining stake in Redecard as compared to a prior-year period pre-tax gain on sale of Redecard of $663 million.

Operating expenses decreased 15% primarily due to re-engineering actions, lower volumes and marketing expenses and the absence of prior-year repositioning charges. The declines in expenses were partially offset by higher OREO and collections costs.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 31% reflecting higher net credit losses of $5.5 billion, partially offset by decreased reserve builds of $855 million.


Table of Contents

        The following table provides additional information, as of September 30, 2009, regarding the Local Consumer Lending loan details. For additional information on loans within Local Consumer Lending, see "Loan and Credit Details—Consumer Loan Details" below.

Composition of Loans within
Local Consumer Lending
 Carrying Value of Assets September 30, 2009 
in billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 June 30,
2009
 % of Assets under U.S.
Government Loss-
Sharing Agreement(1)
 Net credit
loss ratio
 90+ Days
Past Due %
 

North America

                
 

First mortgages

 $123.3 $126.9  66% 3.46% 10.12%
 

Second mortgages

  56.9  59.4  87  7.70  3.01 
 

Student

  26.5  26.6    0.39  3.25 
 

Cards (Retail Partners)

  21.7  22.8  4  14.58  4.08 
 

Personal and Other

  19.3  20.1  10  10.17  3.32 
 

Auto

  15.0  16.2  72  6.61  1.83 
 

Commercial Real Estate

  10.8  11.1  88  2.42  2.38 
            

Total North America

 $273.5 $283.1  56%. 5.61% 6.26%
            

International

                
 

EMEA

 $26.1 $28.6    7.69% 4.52%
 

Asia

  10.9  11.4    14.71  2.40 
 

Latin America

  0.3  0.3    19.14  1.74 
            

Total International

 $37.3 $40.3    9.77% 3.88%
            

Total

 $310.8 $323.4  49% 6.11% 5.97%
            

(1)
See "Government Programs—U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement" below for a description of the agreement.revenue.

Note:        Totals may not sum due to rounding.


Table of Contents


SPECIAL ASSET POOL

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
In millions of dollars
 2009 2008 % Change 2009 2008 % Change 

Net interest revenue

 $627 $836  (25)%$2,712 $2,550  6%

Non-interest revenue

  750  (7,658) NM  (6,556) (30,392) 78 
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,377 $(6,822) NM $(3,844)$(27,842) 86%
              

Total operating expenses

 $233 $204  14%$671 $775  (13)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $1,321 $115  NM $4,470 $205  NM 
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

    (70) 100% 80  (138) NM 
 

Credit reserve builds (release)

  (255) 525  NM  (295) 925  NM 
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $1,066 $570  87%$4,255 $992  NM 
              

Income (Loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $78 $(7,596) NM $(8,770)$(29,609) 70%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (64) (3,002) 98% (3,675) (11,568) 68 
              

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $142 $(4,594) NM $(5,095)$(18,041) 72%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  20  (12) NM  29  (40) 28 
              

Net Income (loss)

 $122 $(4,582) NM $(5,066)$(18,001) 72%
              

EOP assets(in billions of dollars)

 $182 $261  (31)%         
              

NM
Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $8.2 billion primarily due to favorable net revenue marks relative to the prior-year quarter, which are described in more detail below. Revenue in the current quarter included positive marks of $2.0 billion on subprime-related direct exposures and non-credit accretion of $502 million, partially offset by write-downs on CRE of $586 million and $506 million of other write-downs and losses.

Operating expenses increased 14% driven by the USG loss-sharing agreement (see "Government Programs—U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement" below), partially offset by lower compensation expenses.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased $496 million primarily driven by $1.2 billion in increased net credit losses, partially offset by a lower provision of $780 million.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $24.0 billion primarily due to favorable net revenue marks relative to the prior year. Revenue year-to-date included a $1.2 billion positive CVA on derivative positions, excluding monoline insurers, and positive marks of $284 million on subprime-related direct exposures, offset by negative revenue of $1.1 billion on Alt-A mortgages. Revenue year-to-date was also negatively impacted by $3.4 billion related to CVA on fair value option liabilities and monolines, CRE, and negative marks for private equity positions.

Operating expenses decreased 13% mainly driven by lower volumes and lower transaction expenses.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased $3.3 billion primarily driven by the $4.3 billion increase in write-offs over the prior period. Significant write-offs included exposures in Lyondell Basell. The net $295 million net credit reserve release in the current period was driven by a $2.1 billion release for specific counterparties (including Lyondell Basell), partially offset by builds for specific counterparties.

Assets declined 30% versus the prior year primarily driven by amortization/prepayments, sales, and marks/charge-offs.


Table of Contents

        The following table provides details of the composition of the Special Asset Pool assets as of September 30, 2009.

Assets within Special Asset Pool

 
 Carrying Value of Assets September 30, 2009 
in billions of dollars
 September 30,
2009
 June 30,
2009
 % of Assets under U.S.
Government Loss-Sharing
Program(1)
 Face Value Carrying value
as % of Face
Value
 

Securities in AFS/HTM(2)

                
 

Corporates

 $14.8 $17.1  4%$15.1  98%
 

Prime and Non-U.S. MBS

  16.0  16.2  33  20.2  80 
 

Auction Rate Securities

  8.0  8.3  15  10.8  74 
 

Alt-A mortgages

  9.0  9.5  99  17.5  52 
 

Government Agencies

  0.7  6.2    0.8  97 
 

Other Securities(3)

  6.3  7.4  35  8.7  73 
            

Total Securities in AFS/HTM

 $54.8 $64.7  33%$72.9  75%
            

Loan, leases & LC in HFI/HFS(4)

                
 

Corporates

 $26.4 $28.2  33%$28.4  93%
 

Commercial Real Estate (CRE)

  15.3  15.8  65  16.7  92 
 

Other

  3.7  4.7    4.3  85 
 

Loan Loss Reserves

  (4.0) (4.1) NM  NM  NM 
            

Total Loan, leases & LC in HFI/HFS

 $41.4 $44.6  NM  NM  NM 
            

Mark to Market

                
 

Subprime securities(5)

 $8.0 $8.0   $20.9  38%
 

Other Securities(6)

  6.9  8.4  8% 29.5  24 
 

Derivatives

  9.4  10.8    NM  NM 
 

Loans, Leases and Letters of Credit

  7.3  7.8  28  11.5  63 
 

Repurchase agreements

  6.9  7.3    NM  NM 
            

Total Mark to Market

 $38.5 $42.1  9% NM  NM 
            

Highly Lev. Fin. Commitments

 $3.5 $4.6  5%$6.1  57%

Equities (excludes ARS in AFS)

  12.9  13.8    NM  NM 

SIVs

  16.2  16.2  36  21.0  77 

Monolines

  1.3  1.7    NM  NM 

Consumer and Other(7)

  13.3  13.2  NM  NM  NM 
            

Total

 $181.9 $201.0          
            

(1)
See "Government Programs—U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement" below.

(2)
AFS accounts for approximately one-third of the total.

(3)
Includes CRE ($2.2 billion), Municipals ($1.5 billion) and ABS ($1.6 billion).

(4)
HFS accounts for approximately $1.1 billion of the total.

(5)
These $8.0 billion of assets are reflected in the exposures set forth under "U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposure in Citi Holdings—Special Asset Pool" below.

(6)
Includes $3.2 billion of Corporates and $0.7 billion of CRE.

(7)
Includes $4.8 billion of Small Business Banking & Finance loans.

Table of Contents

Items Impacting Special Asset Pool Revenues

        The table below provides additional information regarding the favorable net revenue marks affecting the Special Asset Pool during the third quarter of 2009.

 
 Pretax Revenue
(in millions)
 
 
 Third
Quarter
2009
 Third
Quarter
2008
 

Sub-prime related direct exposures(1)(2)

 $1,967 $(394)

Private Equity and equity investments

  (20) (430)

Alt-A Mortgages(1)(3)

  (196) (932)

Highly leveraged loans and financing commitments(4)

  (24) (792)

Commercial Real Estate (CRE) positions(1)(5)

  (594) (649)

Structured Investment Vehicles' (SIVs) Assets

  (40) (2,004)

Auction Rate Securities (ARS) proprietary positions

    (166)

CVA related to exposure to monoline insurers

  (61) (920)

CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option

  (64)  

CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers

  43  (64)
      

Subtotal

 $1,011 $(6,351)

Accretion on reclassified assets

  502   
      

Total significant revenue items

 $1,513 $(6,351)
      

(1)
Net of hedges.

(2)
See "U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposures in Citi Holdings—Special Asset Pool" below for a further discussion of the related risk exposures and the associated marks recorded.

(3)
For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency RMBS where (i) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (ii) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral composed of full documentation loans. See "Loan and Credit Details—U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending".

(4)
Net of underwriting fees. See "Highly Leveraged Financing Transactions" below for a further discussion.

(5)
The aggregate $594 million is comprised primarily of $497 million, net of hedges, on exposures recorded at fair value and $104 million of losses on equity method investments. Citi Holdings' CRE exposure is split into three categories of assets: held at fair value; held to maturity/held for investment; and equity. See "Exposure to Commercial Real Estate" below for a further discussion.

Credit Valuation Adjustment Related to Monoline Insurers

        CVA is calculated by applying forward default probabilities, which are derived using the counterparty's current credit spread, to the expected exposure profile. The exposure primarily relates to hedges on super senior subprime exposures that were executed with various monoline insurance companies. See "Direct Exposure to Monolines" below for a further discussion.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Citi's Debt Liabilities for Which Citi Has Elected the Fair Value Option

        The Company is required to use its own credit spreads in determining the current value for its derivative liabilities and all other liabilities for which it has elected the fair value option. When Citi's credit spreads widen (deteriorate), Citi recognizes a gain on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has decreased. When Citi's credit spreads narrow (improve), Citi recognizes a loss on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has increased. The approximately $64 million of losses recorded by Citi Holdings on its fair value option liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) during the third quarter of 2009 was principally due to the narrowing (improving) of the Company's credit spreads.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Derivative Positions, excluding Monoline insurers

        The approximately $43 million net gain on Citi Holdings' derivative positions during the third quarter of 2009 was due to the narrowing of the Company's counterparties on its derivative assets. See "Derivatives—Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives" below for a further discussion.

Accretion on Reclassified Assets

        In the fourth quarter of 2008, Citi Holdings reclassified $33.3 billion of debt securities from trading securities to HTM investments, $4.7 billion of debt securities from trading securities to AFS, and $15.7 billion of loans from held-for-sale to held-for-investment. All assets were reclassified with an amortized cost equal to the fair value on the date of reclassification. The difference between the amortized cost basis and the expected principal cash flows is treated as a purchase discount and accreted into income over the remaining life of the security or loan. During the third quarter of 2009, Citi Holdings recognized approximately $502 million of interest revenue from this accretion.


Table of Contents


CORPORATE/OTHER

        Corporate/Other includes global staff functions (includes finance, risk, human resources, legal and compliance) and other corporate expense, global operations and technology (O&T), residual Corporate Treasury and Corporate items. At June 30, 2010, this segment had approximately $262 billion of assets, consisting primarily of Citi's liquidity portfolio.


 Third Quarter Nine Months  Second Quarter Six Months 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008  2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $(461)$(678)$(1,216)$(1,794) $326 $(107)$642 $(749)

Non-interest revenue

 1,132 212 1,646 (413) 337 (634) 370 508 
                  

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $671 $(466)$430 $(2,207)

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $663 $(741)$1,012 $(241)
         

Total operating expenses

 441 (77) 864 18  $352 $322 $811 $423 

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

  1 1 1    1 2 
                  

Income (Loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $230 (390)$(435)$(2,226)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $311 $(1,063)$200 $(666)

Income taxes (benefits)

 128 (203) 145 (818) 182 (1,032) 107 17 
                  

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $102 $(187)$(580)$(1,408)

(Loss) from continuing operations

 $129 $(31)$93 $(683)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 (418) 613 (677) 578  (3) (142) 208 (259)
                  

Net Income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $(316)$426 $(1,257)$(830)

Net Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

     

Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $126 $(173)$301 $(942)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    (2)
                  

Net Income (loss)

 $(316)$426 $(1,257)$(830)

Net income (loss)

 $126 $(173)$301 $(940)
                  

3Q092Q10 vs. 3Q082Q09

        Revenues,,net of interest expense, increased primarily due to reduced mark-to-market volatility in Treasury hedging activities, benefits from lower short-term interest rates and gains on credit default swap hedges.

2Q10 YTD vs. 2Q09 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased due to improved Treasury results, the pretax gain related to the preferred exchange, partly offset by the interest costimpact of the trust preferred securities.lower short-term funding costs and gains on credit default swap hedges.

        Operating Expenses increased, primarily due to compensation-related costs, legal reserve charges and intersegment eliminations and the absence of prior-year reserve releases.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues,net of interest expense, increased primarily due to the pretax gain related to the preferred exchange, intersegment eliminations, and the impact of changes in U.S. dollar rates, partly offset by the interest cost of the trust preferred securities.

Operating Expenses increased primarily due to intersegment eliminations and the absence of prior-year reserve releases.eliminations.


Table of Contents


GOVERNMENT PROGRAMSSEGMENT BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 2010

In millions of dollars Regional
Consumer
Banking
 Institutional
Clients
Group
 Subtotal
Citicorp
 Citi
Holdings
 Corporate/Other,
Discontinued
Operations
and
Consolidating
Eliminations
 Total
Citigroup
Consolidated
 

Assets

                   
 

Cash and due from banks

 $8,074 $14,825 $22,899 $1,196 $614 $24,709 
 

Deposits with banks

  8,176  47,812  55,988  4,510  100,282  160,780 
 

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

  340  223,974  224,314  6,468  2  230,784 
 

Brokerage receivables

    25,424  25,424  11,045  403  36,872 
 

Trading account assets

  11,531  284,958  296,489  20,937  (8,014) 309,412 
 

Investments

  33,857  98,185  132,042  71,262  113,762  317,066 
 

Loans, net of unearned income

                   
 

Consumer

  216,966    216,966  288,480    505,446 
 

Corporate

    161,432  161,432  25,262  26  186,720 
              
 

Loans, net of unearned income

 $216,966 $161,432 $378,398 $313,742 $26 $692,166 
 

Allowance for loan losses

  (14,106) (3,418) (17,524) (28,673)   (46,197)
              
 

Total loans, net

 $202,860 $158,014 $360,874 $285,069 $26 $645,969 
 

Goodwill

  10,070  10,473  20,543  4,658    25,201 
 

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)

  2,288  989  3,277  4,591    7,868 
 

Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)

  1,890  70  1,960  2,934    4,894 
 

Other assets

  29,854  37,595  67,449  52,095  54,557  174,101 
              

Total assets

 $308,940 $902,319 $1,211,259 $464,765 $261,632 $1,937,656 
              

Liabilities and equity

                   
 

Total deposits

 $291,378 $427,314 $718,692 $82,163 $13,096 $813,951 
 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

  3,812  191,922  195,734  233  145  196,112 
 

Brokerage payables

  134  54,069  54,203    571  54,774 
 

Trading account liabilities

  28  127,973  128,001  3,000    131,001 
 

Short-term borrowings

  143  56,844  56,987  6,035  29,730  92,752 
 

Long-term debt

  3,033  76,131  79,164  44,261  289,872  413,297 
 

Other liabilities

  17,344  16,531  33,875  22,006  22,558  78,439 
 

Net inter-segment funding (lending)

  (6,932) (48,465) (55,397) 307,067  (251,670)  
 

Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

         $154,806 $154,806 
 

Noncontrolling interest

          2,524  2,524 
              

Total equity

          157,330  157,330 
              

Total liabilities and equity

 $308,940 $902,319 $1,211,259 $464,765 $261,632 $1,937,656 
              

        The supplemental information presented above reflects Citigroup's consolidated GAAP balance sheet by reporting segment as of June 30, 2010. The respective segment information depicts the assets and liabilities managed by each segment as of such date. While this presentation is not defined by GAAP, Citi believes that these non-GAAP financial measures enhance investors' understanding of the balance sheet components managed by the underlying business segments, as well as the beneficial inter-relationship of the asset and liability dynamics of the balance sheet components among Citi's business segments.


Table of Contents


CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Common Stock Warrants Issued to UST under TARP CAPITAL RESOURCES

        In connectionOverview

        Historically, Citi has generated capital by earnings from its operating businesses. However, Citi may augment, and during the recent financial crisis did augment, its capital through issuances of common stock, convertible preferred stock, preferred stock, equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans, and, in the case of regulatory capital, through the issuance of subordinated debt underlying trust preferred securities. Further, the impact of future events on Citi's business results, such as corporate and asset dispositions, as well as changes in regulatory and accounting standards, also affect Citi's capital levels.

        Capital is used primarily to support assets in Citi's businesses and to absorb market, credit or operational losses. While capital may be used for other purposes, such as to pay dividends or repurchase common stock, Citi's ability to utilize its capital for these purposes is currently restricted due to its agreements with the U.S. government, generally for so long as the U.S. government continues to hold Citi's common stock or trust preferred securities.

        Citigroup's capital management framework is designed to ensure that Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with Citi's risk profile and all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines, as well as external rating agency considerations. The capital management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is reviewed at the consolidated, legal entity and country levels.

        Senior management is responsible for the capital management process mainly through Citigroup's Finance and Asset and Liability Committee (FinALCO), with oversight from the Risk Management and Finance Committee of Citigroup's Board of Directors. The FinALCO is composed of the senior-most management of Citigroup for the purpose of engaging management in decision-making and related discussions on capital and liquidity matters. Among other things, FinALCO's responsibilities include: determining the financial structure of Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries; ensuring that Citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized in consultation with its participation in TARP in Octoberregulators; determining appropriate asset levels and December 2008, Citi issued two warrants exercisablereturn hurdles for common stock toCitigroup and individual businesses; reviewing the UST. These warrants remain outstanding following the completion of the exchange offers.

        The warrant issued to the UST in October 2008 has a term of 10 years, an exercise price of $17.85 per sharefunding and is exercisablecapital markets plan for approximately 210.1 million shares of common stock. The value ascribed to the warrant, or $1.3 billion out of the $25 billion in cash proceeds, on a relative fair value basis, was recorded in Citigroup's stockholders' equityCitigroup; and resulted in an increase inAdditional paid-in capital.

        The warrant issued to the UST in December 2008 also has a term of 10 years, an exercise price of $10.61 per sharemonitoring interest rate risk, corporate and is exercisable for approximately 188.5 million shares of common stock. The value ascribed to the warrant, or $0.5 billion out of the $20 billion in cash proceeds, on a relative fair value basis, was recorded in Citigroup's stockholders' equity and resulted in an increase inAdditional paid-in capital.

        The fair value for the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The valuation was based on the Citigroup stock price, stock volatility, dividend yield,bank liquidity, and the risk free rateimpact of currency translation on the measurement date for both the issuances.

        See "U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement" below for a description of the third common stock warrant issued, outstandingnon-U.S. earnings and held by the UST.capital.

Implementation and Management of TARP ProgramsCapital Ratios

        Citigroup has established a Special TARP Committee composed of senior executives to approve, monitor and track how the USG's TARP funds invested in Citi, or $45 billion, are utilized. Citi is required to adheresubject to the following objectivesrisk-based capital guidelines issued by the Federal Reserve Board. Historically, capital adequacy has been measured, in part, based on two risk-based capital ratios, the Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) ratios. Tier 1 Capital consists of the sum of "core capital elements," such as qualifying common stockholders' equity, as adjusted, qualifying noncontrolling interests, and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts, principally reduced by goodwill, other disallowed intangible assets, and disallowed deferred tax assets. Total Capital also includes "supplementary" Tier 2 Capital elements, such as qualifying subordinated debt and a limited portion of the allowance for credit losses. Both measures of capital adequacy are stated as a conditionpercentage of risk-weighted assets.

        In 2009, the U.S. banking regulators developed a new measure of capital termed "Tier 1 Common," which is defined as Tier 1 Capital less non-common elements, including qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests, and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts. Tier 1 Common and related capital adequacy ratios are measures used and relied upon by U.S. banking regulators; however, they are non-GAAP financial measures for SEC purposes. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.

        Citigroup's risk-weighted assets are principally derived from application of the USG'srisk-based capital investments:

        The Committee has established specific guidelines, which are consistent with the objectives and spirit of TARP.risk. Pursuant to these guidelines, Citi will use TARP capital only for those purposes expressly approved byon-balance-sheet assets and the Committee.

        Committee approval iscredit equivalent amount of certain off-balance-sheet exposures (such as financial guarantees, unfunded lending commitments, letters of credit, and derivatives) are assigned to one of several prescribed risk-weight categories based upon the final stage in a four-step review process to evaluate proposals from Citi businesses forperceived credit risk associated with the use of TARP capital, consideringobligor, or if relevant, the risk,guarantor, the potential financial impact and returns.

        On August 11, 2009, Citi published its most recent quarterly report summarizing its TARP spending initiatives for the second quarter of 2009 (the report is available at www.citigroup.com). The report states that the Committee had authorized $50.8 billion in initiatives backed by TARP capital which has subsequently been increased to $53.8 billion. As of September 30, 2009, the Company has deployed approximately $18.3 billion of funds under the approved initiatives.

FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program

        Under the termsnature of the FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP)collateral, or external credit ratings. Risk-weighted assets also incorporate a measure for market risk on covered trading account positions and all foreign exchange and commodity positions whether or not carried in the trading account. Excluded from risk-weighted assets are any assets, such as goodwill and deferred tax assets, to the extent required to be deducted from regulatory capital. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.

        Citigroup is also subject to a Leverage ratio requirement, a non-risk-based measure of capital adequacy, which is defined as Tier 1 Capital as a percentage of quarterly adjusted average total assets.

        To be "well capitalized" under current federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a bank holding company must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, the FDIC guaranteed, until the earliera Total Capital ratio of either its maturity orat least 10%, and a Leverage ratio of at least 3%, and not be subject to a Federal Reserve Board directive to maintain higher capital levels. The following table sets forth Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios as of June 30, 2012 (for qualifying debt issued before April 1, 2009) or2010 and December 31, 2012 (for qualifying debt issued on or after April 1, 2009, through October 31, 2009), certain qualifying senior unsecured debt issued by certain Citigroup entities between October 31, 2008 and October 31, 2009 in amounts up to 125% of the qualifying debt for each qualifying entity. The FDIC charged Citigroup a fee ranging from 50 to 150 basis points in accordance with a prescribed fee schedule for any qualifying debt issued with the FDIC guarantee. The TLGP was terminated on October 31, 2009 and Citigroup and its affiliates have elected not to participate in any FDIC-approved extension of the program.

        As of September 30, 2009, Citigroup and its affiliates had issued a total of $54.6 billion of long-term debt that is covered under the FDIC guarantee, with $6.35 billion maturing in 2010, $18.75 billion maturing in 2011 and $29.5 billion maturing in 2012.

        In addition, as of September 30, 2009, Citigroup, through its subsidiaries, had $4.37 billion in outstanding commercial paper and interbank deposits backed by the FDIC. The FDIC also charged a fee ranging from 50 to 150 basis points in connection with the issuance of those instruments. As approved by the FDIC, effective October 1, 2009 through the termination of the TLGP program on October 31, 2009, Citigroup issued commercial paper of various tenors without the FDIC guarantee.

        See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below for further information on Citi's funding and liquidity programs.

U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement

Background

        On January 15, 2009, Citigroup entered into an agreement with the UST, the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (collectively referred to in this section as the USG) on losses arising on a $301 billion portfolio of Citigroup assets (valued as of November 21, 2008, other than as set forth in note 1 to the table below). Primarily as a result of the receipt of principal repayment and charge-offs to date, the total asset pool has declined by approximately $50 billion on a GAAP basis to approximately $250.4 billion as of September 30, 2009.

        As consideration for the loss-sharing agreement, Citigroup issued approximately $7.1 billion in preferred stock to the UST and the FDIC, as well as a warrant exercisable for common stock to the UST. As part of the exchange offers, the preferred stock was exchanged for newly issued 8% trust preferred securities. See "Significant Events in the Third Quarter of 2009—Exchange Offers" above. The warrant issued to the UST as consideration for the loss-sharing agreement has a term of 10 years, an exercise price of $10.61 per share and is exercisable for approximately 66.5 million shares of common stock. The fair value of the warrant of $88respectively.


Table of Contents

millionCitigroup Regulatory Capital Ratios

 
 Jun. 30,
2010
 Dec. 31,
2009
 

Tier 1 Common

  9.71% 9.60%

Tier 1 Capital

  11.99  11.67 

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)

  15.59  15.25 

Leverage

  6.31  6.87 
      

        As noted in the table above, Citigroup was recorded"well capitalized" under the federal bank regulatory agency definitions as a creditof June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines

In millions of dollars June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

Tier 1 Common

       

Citigroup common stockholders' equity

 $154,494 $152,388 

Less: Net unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale, net of tax(1)

  (2,259) (4,347)

Less: Accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax

  (3,184) (3,182)

Less: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax(2)

  (3,465) (3,461)

Less: Cumulative effect included in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to the change in own credit worthiness, net of tax(3)

  973  760 

Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets(4)

  31,493  26,044 

Less: Intangible assets:

       
 

Goodwill

  25,213  25,392 
 

Other disallowed intangible assets

  5,393  5,899 

Other

  (776) (788)
      

Total Tier 1 Common

 $99,554 $104,495 
      

Qualifying perpetual preferred stock

 $312 $312 

Qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts

  20,091  19,217 

Qualifying noncontrolling interests

  1,077  1,135 

Other

  1,875  1,875 
      

Total Tier 1 Capital

 $122,909 $127,034 
      

Tier 2 Capital

       

Allowance for credit losses(5)

 $13,275 $13,934 

Qualifying subordinated debt(6)

  22,825  24,242 

Net unrealized pretax gains on available-for-sale equity securities(1)

  743  773 
      

Total Tier 2 Capital

 $36,843 $38,949 
      

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital)

 $159,752 $165,983 
      

Risk-weighted assets(7)

 $1,024,929 $1,088,526 
      

(1)
Tier 1 Capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, in accordance with risk-based capital guidelines. In arriving at Tier 1 Capital, banking organizations are required to deduct net unrealized losses on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax. Banking organizations are permitted to include in Tier 2 Capital up to 45% of net unrealized pretax gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values.

(2)
The Federal Reserve Board granted interim capital relief for the impact of ASC 715-20,Additional paid-in capitalCompensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefits Plans (formerly SFAS 158).

(3)
The impact of including Citigroup's own credit rating in valuing financial liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected is excluded from Tier 1 Capital, in accordance with risk-based capital guidelines.

(4)
Of Citi's approximately $49.9 billion of net deferred tax assets at June 30, 2010, approximately $15.1 billion of such assets were includable without limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $31.5 billion of such assets exceeded the timelimitation imposed by these guidelines and, as "disallowed deferred tax assets," were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 Capital. Citigroup's approximately $3.3 billion of issuance.other net deferred tax assets primarily represented approximately $1.2 billion of deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities and approximately $2.1 billion of deferred tax effects of the pension liability adjustment, which are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to limitation under the guidelines. Citi had approximately $26 billion of disallowed deferred tax assets at December 31, 2009.

(5)
Includable up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Any excess allowance for credit losses is deducted in arriving at risk-weighted assets.

(6)
Includes qualifying subordinated debt in an amount not exceeding 50% of Tier 1 Capital.

(7)
Includes risk-weighted credit equivalent amounts, net of applicable bilateral netting agreements, of $59.8 billion for interest rate, commodity, and equity derivative contracts, foreign exchange contracts, and credit derivatives as of June 30, 2010, compared with $64.5 billion as of December 31, 2009. Market risk equivalent assets included in risk-weighted assets amounted to $63.6 billion at June 30, 2010 and $80.8 billion at December 31, 2009. Risk-weighted assets also include the effect of certain other off-balance-sheet exposures, such as unused lending commitments and letters of credit, and reflect deductions such as certain intangible assets and any excess allowance for credit losses.

Table of Contents

TermsAdoption of AgreementSFAS 166/167 Impact on Capital

        The loss-sharing agreement extends for 10 years for residentialadoption of SFAS 166/167 had a significant and immediate impact on Citigroup's capital ratios as of January 1, 2010.

        As described further in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the adoption of SFAS 166/167 resulted in the consolidation of $137 billion of incremental assets and five years for non-residential$146 billion of liabilities onto Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet, including securitized credit card receivables on the date of adoption, January 1, 2010. The adoption of SFAS 166/167 also resulted in a net increase of $10 billion in risk-weighted assets. UnderIn addition, Citi added $13.4 billion to the agreement,loan loss allowance, increased deferred tax assets by $5.0 billion, and reduced retained earnings by $8.4 billion. This translated into a "loss"reduction in Tangible Common Equity of $8.4 billion, and a decrease in Tier 1 Common, Tier 1 Capital, and Total Capital of $14.2 billion, $14.2 billion and $14.0 billion, respectively, which were partially offset by net income of $4.4 billion and $2.3 billion of qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts issued during the first quarter of 2010.

        The impact on a portfolio asset is generally definedCitigroup's capital ratios from the January 1, 2010 adoption of SFAS 166/167 was as follows:

As of January 1, 2010Impact

Tier 1 Common

(138) bps

Tier 1 Capital

(141) bps

Total Capital

(142) bps

Leverage

(118) bps

TCE (TCE/RWA)

(87) bps

        For more information, see Note 1 to include a charge-off or a realized loss upon collection, through a permitted disposition or exchange, or upon a foreclosure or short-sale loss, but not merely through athe Consolidated Financial Statements below.

Common Stockholders' Equity

        Citigroup's common stockholders' equity increased during the six months ended June 30, 2010 by $2.1 billion to $154.5 billion, and represented 8.0% of total assets as of June 30, 2010. Citigroup's common stockholders' equity was $152.4 billion, which represented 8.2% of total assets, at December 31, 2009.

        The table below summarizes the change in Citigroup's fair value accounting forcommon stockholders' equity during the assetfirst six months of 2010:

In billions of dollars  
 

Common stockholders' equity, December 31, 2009

 $152.4 

Transition adjustment to retained earnings associated with the adoption of SFAS 166/167 (as of January 1, 2010)

  (8.4)

Net income

  7.1 

Employee benefit plans and other activities

  1.7 

ADIA Upper DECs equity units purchase contract

  1.9 

Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

  (0.2)
    

Common stockholders' equity, June 30, 2010

 $154.5 
    

        As of June 30, 2010, $6.7 billion of stock repurchases remained under Citi's authorized repurchase programs. No material repurchases were made in the first six months of 2010, or the creationyear ended December 31, 2009. For so long as the U.S. government holds any Citigroup common stock or increasetrust preferred securities, Citigroup has generally agreed not to acquire, repurchase or redeem any Citigroup equity or trust preferred securities, other than pursuant to administering its employee benefit plans or other customary exceptions, or with the consent of athe U.S. government.

Tangible Common Equity (TCE)

        TCE, as defined by Citigroup, representsCommon equity lessGoodwill andIntangible assets (other than Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs)), net of the related loss reserve. Once a loss is recognized under the agreement, the aggregate amount of qualifying losses across the portfolionet deferred taxes. Other companies may calculate TCE in a particular period is netted against the aggregate recoveriesmanner different from that of Citigroup. Citi's TCE was $121.3 billion at June 30, 2010 and gains across the portfolio, all on a pretax basis.$118.2 billion at December 31, 2009.

        The resulting net loss amount onTCE ratio (TCE divided by risk-weighted assets) was 11.8% at June 30, 2010 and 10.9% at December 31, 2009.

        TCE is a capital adequacy metric used and relied upon by industry analysts; however, it is a non-GAAP financial measure for SEC purposes. A reconciliation of Citigroup's total stockholders' equity to TCE follows:

In millions of dollars June 30,
2010
 Dec. 31,
2009
 

Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

 $154,806 $152,700 

Less:

       
 

Preferred stock

  312  312 
      

Common equity

 $154,494 $152,388 

Less:

       
 

Goodwill

  25,201  25,392 
 

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)

  7,868  8,714 
 

Goodwill-recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets

  12   
 

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)— recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets

  54   
 

Related net deferred tax assets

  62  68 
      

Tangible common equity (TCE)

 $121,297 $118,214 
      

Tangible assets

       

GAAP assets

 $1,937,656 $1,856,646 
 

Less:

       
  

Goodwill

  25,201  25,392 
  

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)

  7,868  8,714 
  

Goodwill-recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets

  12   
  

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)— recorded as assets held for sale in Other assets

  54   
  

Related deferred tax assets

  365  386 

Federal bank regulatory reclassification

    5,746 
      

Tangible assets (TA)

 $1,904,156 $1,827,900 
      

Risk-weighted assets (RWA)

 $1,024,929 $1,088,526 
      

TCE/TA ratio

  6.37% 6.47%
      

TCE/RWA ratio

  11.83% 10.86%
      

Table of Contents

Capital Resources of Citigroup's Depository Institutions

        Citigroup's U.S. subsidiary depository institutions are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the portfolio is the basisguidelines of the loss-sharing agreement between CitigroupFederal Reserve Board. To be "well capitalized" under current regulatory definitions, Citigroup's depository institutions must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) ratio of at least 10%, and the USG. Citigroup will bear the first $39.5 billiona Leverage ratio of such net losses, which amount was determined using (i) an agreed-upon $29 billionat least 5%, and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels.

        At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, all of first losses, (ii) Citigroup's then-existing reserve with respect to the portfolio of approximately $9.5 billion, and (iii) an additional $1.0 billionU.S. subsidiary depository institutions were "well capitalized" under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, including Citigroup's primary depository institution, Citibank, N.A., as an agreed-upon amount in exchange for excluding the effects of certain hedge positions from the portfolio. Net losses, if any, on the portfolio after Citigroup's losses exceed the $39.5 billion first-loss amount will be borne 90% by the USG and 10% by Citigroupnoted in the following manner:table:

        Approximately $2.8 billion of GAAP lossesregulatory limitations on the asset pool were recorded inability of Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions to pay dividends, extend credit or otherwise supply funds to Citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries. In determining the third quarterdeclaration of 2009, bringing the GAAP lossesdividends, each depository institution must also consider its effect on the portfolio to date to approximately $8.1 billion (i.e., for the period of November 21, 2008 through September 30, 2009). These losses count towards Citigroup's $39.5 billion first-loss position.

        The Federal Reserve Bank of New York will implement its loss-sharing obligations under the agreement, if any, by making a loan in an amount equal to the then aggregate valueapplicable risk-based capital and Leverage ratio requirements, as well as policy statements of the remaining covered asset pool (after reductions for charge-offs, pay-downs and realized losses) as determined in accordance withfederal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Citigroup did not receive any dividends from its bank subsidiaries during the agreement. Following the loan, as losses are incurred on the remaining covered asset pool, Citigroup will be required to immediately repay 10%first six months of such losses to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The loan is non-recourse to Citigroup, other than with respect to the repayment obligation in the preceding sentence and interest on the loan. The loan is recourse only to the remaining covered asset pool, which is the sole collateral to secure the loan. The loan will bear interest at the overnight index swap rate plus 300 basis points.

        The covered asset pool includes U.S.-based exposures and transactions that were originated prior to March 14, 2008. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the USG had a 120-day period, beginning April 15, 2009, to review the asset pool to confirm asset eligibility. The USG has completed its review and, in October 2009, substantially agreed with Citigroup on the final asset pool's composition. The USG's final approval of the pool is expected in November 2009. After final approval of the pool, the USG has the right to review and confirm Citigroup's first-loss position ($39.5 billion) and the consideration paid by Citigroup for the loss coverage, each based on expected losses and reserves associated with the final pool (using a methodology and assumptions consistent with those used to set the $39.5 billion first-loss position). The USG is expected to complete this review in the fourth quarter of 2009.

        The agreement includes guidelines for governance and asset management with respect to the covered asset pool, including reporting requirements and notice and approval rights of the USG at certain thresholds. If covered losses exceed $19 billion, the USG may increase the required reporting or alter the thresholds for notice and approval. If covered losses exceed $27 billion, the USG has the right to replace Citi as the asset manager for the covered asset pool, among other things.

Accounting and Regulatory Capital Treatment

        Citigroup accounts for the loss-sharing agreement as an indemnification agreement pursuant to the guidance in ASC 805-20-30-18,Business Combinations. Citigroup recorded an asset of $3.617 billion (equal to the fair value of the consideration issued to the USG) inOther assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The asset will be amortized as anOther operating expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income on a straight-line basis over the coverage periods of 10 years and five years, respectively, based on the relative initial principal amounts of each group. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, Citigroup recorded $122 million and $412 million, respectively, as anOther operating expense.

        Under indemnification accounting, recoveries (gains), if any, will be recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income in the same future periods that cumulative losses recorded under U.S. GAAP on the covered assets exceed the $39.5 billion first-loss amount. The Company will recognize and measure an indemnification asset on the same basis that it recognizes losses on the covered assets in the Consolidated Statement of Income. For example, for a covered loan classified as held-for-investment and reported in the balance sheet at amortized cost, the Company would recognize and measure an indemnification asset due from the USG at the same time related loan loss reserves are recorded for that loan equal to 90% of the amount of the loan loss reserve, subject to the first-loss limitation.

        Further, under indemnification accounting, recoveries (gains) may be recorded at times when such amounts are not contractually receivable from the USG based on the definition of covered losses in the loss-sharing agreement. Such amounts may or may not thereafter become contractually receivable, depending upon whether or not they become covered "losses" (see above for definition of covered "loss"). Indemnification accounting matches the amount and timing of the recording of recoveries with the amount and timing of the recognition of losses based on the U.S. GAAP accounting for the covered assets, as opposed to the amount and timing of recognition as defined in the loss-sharing agreement. The indemnification asset amount recorded will be adjusted, as appropriate, to take into consideration additional revenue and expense amounts related to the covered assets specifically defined as2010.


Table of Contents

recoverable or non-recoverable        The following table presents the estimated sensitivity of Citigroup's and Citibank, N.A.'s capital ratios to changes of $100 million in the loss-sharing program.

        The covered assets are risk-weighted at 20% for purposes of calculating theTier 1 Common, Tier 1 Capital, or Total Capital (numerator), or changes of $1 billion in risk-weighted assets or adjusted average total assets (denominator) based on financial information as of June 30, 2010. This information is provided for the purpose of analyzing the impact that a change in Citigroup's or Citibank, N.A.'s financial position or results of operations could have on these ratios. These sensitivities only consider a single change to either a component of capital, risk-weighted assets, or adjusted average total assets. Accordingly, an event that affects more than one factor may have a larger basis point impact than is reflected in this table.


Tier 1 Common ratioTier 1 Capital ratioTotal Capital ratioLeverage ratio

Impact of $100
million change in
Tier 1 Common
Impact of $1
billion change in
risk-weighted
assets
Impact of $100
million change in
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of $1
billion change in
risk-weighted
assets
Impact of $100
million change in
Total Capital
Impact of $1
billion change in
risk-weighted
assets
Impact of $100
million change in
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of $1
billion change in
adjusted average
total assets

Citigroup

1.0 bps0.9 bps1.0 bps1.2 bps1.0 bps1.5bps0.5 bps0.3 bps

Citibank, N.A. 

1.4 bps2.0 bps1.4 bps2.2 bps0.9 bps0.8 bps

Broker-Dealer Subsidiaries

        At June 30, 2010, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., a broker-dealer registered with the SEC that is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), had net capital, computed in accordance with the SEC's net capital rule, of $8.3 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement by $7.6 billion.

        In addition, certain of Citi's broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to regulation in the other countries in which they do business, including requirements to maintain specified levels of net capital or its equivalent. Citigroup's broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with their capital requirements at SeptemberJune 30, 2010.

        Similar to pending changes to capital standards applicable to Citigroup, as discussed under "Regulatory Capital Standards Developments" below, net capital requirements applicable to Citigroup's broker-dealer subsidiaries in the U.S. and other jurisdictions may be subject to change in light of the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Financial Reform Act) and other actions currently being considered at both the legislative and regulatory levels. Citi continues to monitor these developments closely.

Regulatory Capital Standards Developments

        The prospective regulatory capital standards for financial institutions are currently subject to significant debate, rulemaking activity and uncertainty, both in the U.S. as well as internationally. Citi continues to monitor these developments closely.

        Basel II and III.    In late 2005, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee) published a new set of risk-based capital standards (Basel II) which would permit banks, including Citigroup, to leverage internal risk models used to measure credit, operational, and market risk exposures to drive regulatory capital calculations. In late 2007, the U.S. banking regulators adopted these standards for large banks, including Citigroup. As adopted, the standards require Citigroup, as a large and internationally active bank, to comply with the most advanced Basel II approaches for calculating credit and operational risk capital requirements, which could result in a need for Citigroup to hold additional regulatory capital. The U.S. implementation timetable consists of a parallel calculation period under the current regulatory capital regime (Basel I) and Basel II followed by a three-year transitional period.

        Citi began parallel reporting on April 1, 2010. There will be at least four quarters of parallel reporting before Citi enters the three-year transitional period. U.S. regulators have reserved the right to change how Basel II is applied in the U.S. following a review at the end of the second year of the transitional period, and to retain the existing prompt corrective action and leverage capital requirements applicable to banking organizations in the U.S. Citigroup intends to implement Basel II within the timeframe required by the U.S. regulators.

        Separate from the Basel II rules for credit and operational risk discussed above, the Basel Committee has proposed revisions to the market risk framework that could also lead to additional capital requirements (Basel III). Although not yet ratified by the Basel Committee or U.S. regulators, the Basel III final rules for capital, leverage and liquidity (Basel III introduces new global standards and ratios for liquidity risk measurement) are currently expected to be published by January 2011, one quarter ahead of Citigroup's earliest date for Basel II implementation for credit and operational risk.

        Financial Reform Act.    In addition to the implementation of Basel II and Basel III, the Financial Reform Act grants new regulatory authority to various U.S. federal regulators, including the Federal Reserve Board and a newly created Financial Stability Oversight Council (Oversight Council), to impose heightened prudential standards on financial institutions such as Citigroup. These standards could include heightened capital, leverage and liquidity standards, as well as requirements for periodic stress tests. The Federal Reserve Board will also have discretion to impose other prudential standards, including contingent capital requirements, and will retain important flexibility to distinguish among bank holding companies such as Citigroup based on their perceived riskiness, complexity, activities, size and other factors.

        In addition, the so-called "Collins Amendment" to the Financial Reform Act will result in new minimum capital requirements for bank holding companies such as Citigroup, and could require Citigroup to replace certain of its outstanding securities that are currently counted towards Citi's Tier 1 Capital requirements, such as trust preferred securities, over a period of time.


Table of Contents


FUNDING AND LIQUIDITY

General

        Citigroup's cash flows and liquidity needs are primarily generated within its operating subsidiaries. Exceptions exist for major corporate items, such as equity and certain long-term debt issuances, which take place at the Citigroup corporate level. Generally, Citi's management of funding and liquidity is designed to optimize availability of funds as needed within Citi's legal and regulatory structure. Due to various constraints that limit certain Citi subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends or otherwise make funds available (see "Parameters for Intercompany Funding Transfers" below), Citigroup's primary objectives for funding and liquidity management are established by entity and in aggregate across: (i) the parent holding company/broker dealer subsidiaries; and (ii) bank subsidiaries.

        Currently, Citigroup's primary sources of funding include deposits, long-term debt and long-term collateralized financing, and equity, including preferred, trust preferred securities and common stock. This funding is supplemented by modest amounts of short-term borrowings.

        Citi views its deposit base as its most stable and lowest cost funding source. Citi has focused on maintaining a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base that stood at approximately $814 billion as of June 30, 2010, as compared with $828 billion at March 31, 2010 and $836 billion at December 31, 2009. The sequential decline in deposits primarily resulted from FX translation. Excluding FX translation, Citigroup deposits at June 30, 2010 remained flat as compared with the first quarter of 2010. As stated above, Citigroup's deposits are diversified across products and regions, with approximately 63% outside of the U.S.

        At June 30, 2010, long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for Citigroup, Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI) and other Citigroup subsidiaries, collectively, were as follows:

In billions of dollars Citigroup
Parent
Company
 Other
Non-bank
 Bank Total
Citigroup(1)
 

Long-term debt(2)

 $189.1 $75.7 $148.5(3)$413.3 

Commercial paper

    11.2  25.2  36.4 

(1)
Includes $101.0 billion of long-term debt and $25.2 billion of commercial paper related to VIEs consolidated effective January 1, 2010 with the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

(2)
Of this amount, approximately $64.6 billion is guaranteed by the FDIC under the TGLP with $6.3 billion maturing in 2010, $20.3 billion maturing in 2011 and $38 billion maturing in 2012.

(3)
At June 30, 2010, approximately $18.6 billion relates to collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

        The $36.4 billion of commercial paper outstanding as of June 30, 2010 reflects the consolidation of VIEs pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 effective January 1, 2010; the $10.2 billion at December 31, 2009 was pre-adoption. The VIE consolidation led to an increase in bank subsidiary commercial paper, while non-bank subsidiarycommercial paper remained at recent levels.

        The table below details the long-term debt issuances of Citigroup during the past five quarters.

In billions of dollars 2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 

Debt issued under TLGP guarantee

 $17.0 $10.0 $10.0 $ $ 

Debt issued without TLGP guarantee:

                
 

Citigroup parent company/CFI

  7.4  12.6  4.0(3) 1.3  5.0(3)
 

Other Citigroup subsidiaries

  10.1(1) 7.9(2) 5.8(4) 3.7(5) 0.1 
            

Total(6)

 $34.5 $30.5 $19.8 $5.0 $5.1 
            

(1)
Includes $8.5 billion issued through the U.S. government-sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility, and $1 billion issued by Citibank Pty. Ltd. Australia and guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Australia and other local country debt.

(2)
Includes $3.3 billion issued through the U.S. government-sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility, and $1 billion issued by Citibank Pty. Ltd. Australia and guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Australia and other local country debt.

(3)
Includes $1.9 billion of senior debt issued under remarketing of $1.9 billion of Citigroup Capital XXIX and $1.9 billion of Citigroup Capital XXX trust preferred securities held by the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) to enable them to execute the forward stock purchase contract in March 2010 and June 2010, respectively.

(4)
Includes $1.4 billion issued through the U.S. government-sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility and other local country debt.

(5)
Includes $0.5 billion issued through the U.S. government-sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility, and $0.5 billion issued by Citibank Pty. Ltd. Australia and guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Australia and other local country debt.

(6)
The table excludes the effect of trust preferred issuances, including $27.1 billion in 3Q09 and $2.3 billion in 2Q10.

        See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail on Citigroup's and its affiliates' long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding.

        Structural liquidity, defined as the sum of deposits, long-term debt and stockholders' equity as a percentage of total assets, was 71% at June 30, 2010, unchanged as compared with March 31, 2010 and compared with 67% at June 30, 2009.

Asset Values        In addition, one of Citi's key structural liquidity measures is the cash capital ratio. Cash capital is a broader measure of the ability to fund the structurally illiquid portion of Citigroup's balance sheet than traditional measures, such as deposits to loans or core deposits to loans. Cash capital measures the amount of long-term funding (>1 year) available to fund illiquid assets. Long-term funding includes core customer deposits, long-term debt and equity. Illiquid assets include loans (net of liquidity adjustments), illiquid securities, securities haircuts and other assets (i.e., goodwill, intangibles, fixed assets, receivables, etc.). At June 30, 2010, the combined Citigroup, the parent holding company, and CGMHI, as well as the aggregate bank subsidiaries had an excess of cash capital. In addition, as of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010, the combined Citigroup, the parent holding company, and CGMHI maintained liquidity to meet all maturing obligations significantly in excess of a one-year period without access to the unsecured wholesale markets.


Table of Contents

Aggregate Liquidity Resources

 
 Parent & Broker Dealer Significant Bank Entities Total 
In billions of dollars Jun. 30,
2010
 Mar. 31,
2010
 Jun. 30,
2009
 Jun. 30,
2010
 Mar. 31,
2010
 Jun. 30,
2009
 Jun. 30,
2010
 Mar. 31,
2010
 Jun. 30,
2009
 

Cash at major central banks

 $24.7 $9.5 $22.5 $86.0 $108.9 $110.0 $110.7 $118.4 $132.5 

Unencumbered Liquid Securities

  56.8  72.8  42.5  143.4  128.7  53.3  200.2  201.5  95.8 
                    

Total

 $81.5 $82.3 $65.0 $229.4 $237.6 $163.3 $310.9 $319.9 $228.3 
                    

        As noted in the table above, Citigroup's aggregate liquidity resources totaled $310.9 billion as of June 30, 2010, compared with $319.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $228.3 billion at June 30, 2009. Excluding the impact of FX translation, the level of liquidity resources at June 30, 2010 was essentially flat to the prior quarter. These amounts are as of quarter-end, and may increase or decrease intra-quarter and intra-day in the ordinary course of business.

        As of June 30, 2010, Citigroup's and its affiliates' liquidity portfolio and broker-dealer "cash box" totaled $81.5 billion, compared with $82.3 billion at March 31, 2010 and $65.0 billion at June 30, 2009. This includes the liquidity portfolio and cash box held in the U.S. as well as government bonds held by Citigroup's broker-dealer entities in the United Kingdom and Japan. Citigroup's bank subsidiaries had an aggregate of approximately $86 billion of cash on deposit with major central banks (including the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the European Central Bank, Bank of England, Swiss National Bank, Bank of Japan, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority), compared with approximately $108.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $110.0 billion at June 30, 2009. These amounts are in addition to cash deposited from the broker-dealer "cash box" noted above.

        Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also have significant additional liquidity resources through unencumbered highly liquid securities available for secured funding through private markets or that are, or could be, pledged to the major central banks and the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks. The value of these liquid securities was $143.4 billion at June 30, 2010, compared with $128.7 billion at March 31, 2010 and $53.3 billion at June 30, 2009. Significant amounts of cash and liquid securities are also available in other Citigroup entities.

        In addition to the highly liquid securities listed above, Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also maintain additional unencumbered securities and loans which are currently pledged to the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks and U.S. Federal Reserve Banks.

        Further, Citigroup, as the parent holding company, can transfer funding, subject to certain legal restrictions, to other affiliated entities, including its bank subsidiaries. Citi's non-bank subsidiaries, such as its broker-dealer subsidiaries, can also transfer excess liquidity to the parent holding company through termination of intercompany borrowings, and to the parent holding company and other affiliates, including Citi's bank subsidiaries. In addition, Citigroup's bank subsidiaries, including Citibank, N.A., can lend to Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. As of June 30, 2010, the amount available for lending under Section 23A was approximately $26 billion, provided the funds are collateralized appropriately.

Funding Outlook

        The following table summarizesBased on the assets that were partcurrent status of Citi's aggregate liquidity resources discussed above, as well as Citi's continued deleveraging, stability in its deposit base to date, and its increased structural liquidity over the covered asset pool agreedprior two years, Citi currently expects to between Citigroup and the USGrefinance only a portion of its long-term debt maturing in 2010. In addition, Citi does not currently expect to refinance its TLGP debt as of January 15, 2009, with their values as of November 21, 2008 (except asit matures (as set forth in note 12 of the long-term debt above). However, as part of its efforts to maintain and solidify its structural liquidity, as well as extend the table below), andduration of liabilities supporting its businesses, for the balances asfull year of September 30, 2009, reflecting changes2010, Citi currently expects to issue approximately $18 billion to $21 billion in the balances of assetslong-term debt (excluding local country debt) an amount that remained qualified, plus approximately $10is $3 billion to $6 billion higher than previously-stated estimates. This $18 billion to $21 billion of replacement assets that Citi substituted for non-qualifying assets between January 15, 2009 and April 15, 2009. The $250.4expected issuance is less than the $35 billion of covered assets at September 30, 2009 are recorded inexpected maturities during the year (excluding local country debt). Citi Holdings within Local Consumer Lending ($171.9 billion)continues to review its funding and Special Asset Pool ($78.5 billion). As discussed above,liquidity needs and may adjust its expected issuances for the asset pool,remainder of 2010 due to market conditions or regulatory requirements, among other factors.


Table of Contents

Credit Ratings

        Citigroup's ability to access the capital markets and other sources of funds, as revised, remains subjectwell as the cost of these funds and its ability to maintain certain deposits, is dependent on its credit ratings. The table below indicates the USG's final approval, which is expected in November 2009.

Assets

In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 November 21,
2008(1)
 

Loans:

       
 

First mortgages

 $81.0 $98.0 
 

Second mortgages

  49.6  55.4 
 

Retail auto loans

  10.8  16.2 
 

Other consumer loans

  17.6  19.7 
      

Total consumer loans

 $159.0 $189.3 
      
 

CRE loans

 $10.8 $12.0 
 

Highly leveraged finance loans

  0.2  2.0 
 

Other corporate loans

  10.5  14.0 
      

Total corporate loans

 $21.5 $28.0 
      

Securities:

       
 

Alt-A

 $9.1 $11.4 
 

SIVs

  5.8  6.1 
 

CRE

  1.5  1.4 
 

Other

  8.2  11.2 
      

Total securities

 $24.6 $30.1 
      

Unfunded lending commitments (ULC)

       
 

Second mortgages

 $18.3 $22.4 
 

Other consumer loans

  2.4  3.6 
 

Highly leveraged finance

  0.0  0.1 
 

CRE

  3.8  5.5 
 

Other commitments

  20.8  22.0 
      

Total ULC

 $45.3 $53.6 
      

Total covered assets

 $250.4 $301.0 
      

(1)
current ratings for Citigroup. As a result of the initial confirmation process (conducted between November 21, 2008Citigroup guarantee, changes in ratings for Citigroup Funding Inc. are the same as those of Citigroup.

Citigroup's Debt Ratings as of June 30, 2010


Citigroup Inc.Citigroup Funding Inc.Citibank, N.A.

Senior
debt
Commercial
paper
Senior
debt
Commercial
paper
Long-
term
Short-
term

Fitch Ratings

A+F1+A+F1+A+F1+

Moody's Investors Service

A3P-1A3P-1A1P-1

Standard & Poor's (S&P)

AA-1AA-1A+A-1

        The credit rating agencies included in the chart above have each indicated that they are evaluating the impact of the Financial Reform Act on the rating support assumptions currently included in their methodologies as related to large bank holding companies. These evaluations are generally as a result of agencies' belief that the Financial Reform Act increases the uncertainty regarding the U.S. government's willingness to provide extraordinary support to such companies. Consistent with such belief and to bring Citi in line with other large banks, S&P and Moody's revised their outlooks on Citigroup's supported ratings from stable to negative in February and July of 2010, respectively. The credit rating agencies have generally indicated that their evaluations of the impact of the Financial Reform Act could take anywhere from several months to two years. The ultimate timing of the completion of the evaluations, as well as the outcomes, is uncertain.

        Ratings downgrades by Fitch Ratings, Moody's Investors Service or Standard & Poor's could have material impacts on funding and liquidity through cash obligations, reduced funding capacity and due to collateral triggers. Because of the current credit ratings of Citigroup Inc., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating may or may not impact Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating by one notch. As of June 30, 2010, Citi currently believes that a one-notch downgrade of both the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc. and a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating could result in the assumed loss of unsecured commercial paper ($10.6 billion) and tender option bonds funding ($1.9 billion) as well as derivative triggers and additional margin requirements ($1.0 billion).

        Additionally, other funding sources, such as repurchase agreements and other margin requirements for which there are no explicit triggers, could be adversely affected. The aggregate liquidity resources of Citigroup's parent holding company and broker-dealer stood at $83.6 billion as of June 30, 2010, in part as a contingency for such an event, and a broad range of mitigating actions are currently included in the Citigroup Contingency Funding Plan. These mitigating factors include, but are not limited to, accessing funding capacity from existing clients, diversifying funding sources, adjusting the size of select trading books, and tailoring levels of reverse repurchase agreement lending.

        Citi currently believes that a more severe ratings downgrade scenario, such as a two-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc., accompanied by a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating, could result in an additional $1.6 billion in funding requirement in the form of cash obligations and collateral.

        Further, as of June 30, 2010, a one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term ratings of Citibank, N.A. could result in an approximate $3.6 billion funding requirement in the form of collateral and cash obligations. Because of the current credit ratings of Citibank, N.A., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating is unlikely to have any impact on its commercial paper/short-term rating. The significant bank entities, Citibank, N.A., and other bank vehicles have aggregate liquidity resources of $229 billion, and have a detailed contingency funding plan that encompasses a broad range of mitigating actions.


Table of Contents


OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

        Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance-sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs), primarily in connection with securitization activities inRegional Consumer Banking andInstitutional Clients Group. Citigroup and its subsidiaries use SPEs principally to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroup's financial assets, assisting clients in securitizing their financial assets and creating investment products for clients. The adoption of SFAS 166/167, effective on January 15, 2009), the covered asset pool includes approximately $99 billion of assets considered "replacement" assets (assets that were added1, 2010, caused certain SPEs, including credit card receivables securitization trusts and asset-backed commercial paper conduits, to be consolidated in Citi's Financial Statements. For further information on Citi's securitization activities and involvement in SPEs, see Notes 1 and 14 to the pool to replace assets that were in the pool as of November 21, 2008 but were later determined not to qualify). Loss-sharing on qualifying losses incurred on these replacement assets was effective beginning January 15, 2009, instead of November 21, 2008.

Consolidated Financial Statements.


Table of Contents


MANAGING GLOBAL RISK

        Citigroup's risk management framework balances strong corporate oversight with well-defined independent risk management functions for each business and region, as well as cross-business product expertise. The Citigroup risk management framework is described in Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.


LOAN AND CREDIT DETAILSRISK

Loan and Credit Overview

        During the second quarter of 2010, Citigroup's aggregate loan portfolio decreased by $29.6 billion to $692.2 billion. Citi's total allowance for loan losses totaled $46.2 billion at June 30, 2010, a coverage ratio of 6.72% of total loans, down from 6.80% at March 31, 2010 and up from 5.60% in the second quarter of 2009.

        During the second quarter of 2010, Citigroup recorded a net release of $1.5 billion to its credit reserves and allowance for unfunded lending commitments, compared to a $3.9 billion build in the second quarter of 2009. The release consisted of a net release of $683 million for corporate loans ($253 million release inICG and approximately $400 million release inSAP), and a net release of $827 million for consumer loans, mainly for Retail Partner Cards in Citi Holdings,LATAM RCB andAsia RCB (mainly a $412 million release inRCB and a $421 million release inLCL). Despite the reserve release for consumer loans, the coincident months of coverage of the consumer portfolio increased from 15.5 to 15.9 months, significantly higher than the year-ago level of 12.7 months.

        Net credit losses of $8.0 billion during the second quarter of 2010 decreased $3.5 billion from year-ago levels (on a managed basis). The decrease consisted of a net decrease of $2.2 billion for consumer loans (mainly a $1.9 billion decrease inLCL and a $321 million decrease inRCB) and a decrease of $1.3 billion for corporate loans ($1.2 billion decrease inSAP and a $126 million decrease inICG).

        Consumer non-accrual loans (which excludes credit card receivables) totaled $13.8 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $15.6 billion at March 31, 2010 and $15.8 billion at June 30, 2009. The consumer loan 90 days or more delinquency rate was 3.67% at June 30, 2010, compared to 4.01% at March 31, 2010 and 3.68% a year ago. The 30 to 89 days past due consumer loan delinquency rate was 3.06% at June 30, 2010, compared to 3.19% at March 31, 2010 and 3.41% a year ago. During the second quarter of 2010, both early- and later-stage delinquencies declined across most of the consumer loan portfolios, driven by improvement in North America mortgages. Delinquencies declined in first mortgages, entirely as a result of asset sales and loans moving from the trial period under the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) to permanent modification.

        Corporate non-accrual loans were $11.0 billion at June 30, 2010, compared to $12.9 billion at March 31, 2010 and $12.5 billion a year ago. The decrease from the prior quarter was mainly due to loan sales, write-offs and paydowns, which were partially offset by increases due to weakening of certain borrowers.

        See below for a discussion of Citi's loan and credit accounting policies.


Table of Contents


Loans Outstanding

In millions of dollars September 30,
2009
 June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 
In millions of dollars at year endIn millions of dollars at year end 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

Consumer loans

Consumer loans

 

Consumer loans

 

In U.S. offices:

 

In U.S. offices

In U.S. offices

 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 $191,748 $197,358 $219,482 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 $171,102 $180,334 $183,842 $191,748 $197,358 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 63,668 67,661 71,360 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 61,867 69,111 58,099 57,820 61,645 

Cards

 36,039 33,750 44,418 

Cards

 125,337 127,818 28,951 36,039 33,750 

Lease financing

 15 16 31 

Commercial and industrial

 5,540 5,386 5,640 5,848 6,016 
       

Lease financing

 6 7 11 15 16 

 $291,470 $298,785 $335,291             
       

 $363,852 $382,656 $276,543 $291,470 $298,785 

In offices outside the U.S.:

 
           

In offices outside the U.S.

In offices outside the U.S.

 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 $47,568 $45,986 $44,382 

Mortgage and real estate (1)

 $47,921 $49,421 $47,297 $47,568 $45,986 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 48,027 48,467 44,189 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 38,115 44,541 42,805 45,004 45,556 

Cards

 41,443 42,262 42,586 

Cards

 37,510 38,191 41,493 41,443 42,262 

Commercial and industrial

 11,835 10,947 13,897 

Commercial and industrial

 16,420 14,828 14,780 14,858 13,858 

Lease financing

 345 339 304 

Lease financing

 677 771 331 345 339 
                   

 $149,218 $148,001 $145,358 

 $140,643 $147,752 $146,706 $149,218 $148,001 
                   

Total consumer loans

Total consumer loans

 $440,688 $446,786 $480,649 

Total consumer loans

 $504,495 $530,408 $423,249 $440,688 $446,786 

Unearned income

Unearned income

 803 866 738 

Unearned income

 951 1,061 808 803 866 
                   

Consumer loans, net of unearned income

Consumer loans, net of unearned income

 $441,491 $447,652 $481,387 

Consumer loans, net of unearned income

 $505,446 $531,469 $424,057 $441,491 $447,652 
                   

Corporate loans

Corporate loans

 

Corporate loans

 

In U.S. offices:

 

In U.S. offices

In U.S. offices

 

Commercial and industrial

 $23,345 $30,567 $33,450 

Commercial and industrial

 $11,656 $15,558 $15,614 $19,692 $26,125 

Loans to financial institutions

 7,666 8,181 10,200 

Loans to financial institutions

 31,450 31,279 6,947 7,666 8,181 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 23,221 23,862 16,643 

Mortgage and real estate (1)

 22,453 21,283 22,560 23,221 23,862 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 14,081 15,414 15,047 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 14,812 15,792 17,737 17,734 19,856 

Lease financing

 1,275 1,284 1,476 

Lease financing

 1,244 1,239 1,297 1,275 1,284 
                   

 $69,588 $79,308 $76,816 

 $81,615 $85,151 $64,155 $69,588 $79,308 
                   

In offices outside the U.S.:

 

In offices outside the U.S.

In offices outside the U.S.

 

Commercial and industrial

 $73,564 $78,512 $85,492 

Commercial and industrial

 $65,615 $64,903 $68,467 $73,564 $78,512 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 10,949 11,638 23,158 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 11,174 10,956 9,683 10,949 11,638 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 12,023 11,887 11,375 

Mortgage and real estate (1)

 7,301 9,771 9,779 12,023 11,887 

Loans to financial institutions

 16,906 15,856 18,413 

Loans to financial institutions

 20,646 19,003 15,113 16,906 15,856 

Lease financing

 1,462 1,560 1,850 

Lease financing

 582 663 1,295 1,462 1,560 

Governments and official institutions

 826 713 385 

Governments and official institutions

 1,046 1,324 1,229 826 713 
                   

 $115,730 $120,166 $140,673 

 $106,364 $106,620 $105,566 $115,730 $120,166 
                   

Total corporate loans

Total corporate loans

 $185,318 $199,474 $217,489 

Total corporate loans

 $187,979 $191,771 $169,721 $185,318 $199,474 

Unearned income

Unearned income

 (4,598) (5,436) (4,660)

Unearned income

 (1,259) (1,436) (2,274) (4,598) (5,436)
                   

Corporate loans, net of unearned income

Corporate loans, net of unearned income

 $180,720 $194,038 $212,829 

Corporate loans, net of unearned income

 $186,720 $190,335 $167,447 $180,720 $194,038 
                   

Total loans—net of unearned income

Total loans—net of unearned income

 $622,211 $641,690 $694,216 

Total loans—net of unearned income

 $692,166 $721,804 $591,504 $622,211 $641,690 
       

Allowance for loan losses—on drawn exposures

Allowance for loan losses—on drawn exposures

 (36,416) (35,940) (29,616)

Allowance for loan losses—on drawn exposures

 (46,197) (48,746) (36,033) (36,416) (35,940)
                   

Total loans—net of unearned income and allowance for credit losses

Total loans—net of unearned income and allowance for credit losses

 $585,795 $605,750 $664,600 

Total loans—net of unearned income and allowance for credit losses

 $645,969 $673,058 $555,471 $585,795 $605,750 

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans—net of unearned income(2)

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans—net of unearned income(2)

 5.85% 5.60% 4.27%

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans—net of unearned income(2)

 6.72% 6.80% 6.09% 5.85% 5.60%
                   

Allowance for consumer loan losses as a percentage of total consumer loans—net of unearned income(2)

Allowance for consumer loan losses as a percentage of total consumer loans—net of unearned income(2)

 6.44% 6.25% 4.61%

Allowance for consumer loan losses as a percentage of total consumer loans—net of unearned income(2)

 7.87% 7.84% 6.70% 6.44% 6.25%

Allowance for corporate loan losses as a percentage of total corporate loans—net of unearned income

 4.42 4.11 3.48 
                   

Allowance for corporate loan losses as a percentage of total corporate loans—net of unearned income(2)

Allowance for corporate loan losses as a percentage of total corporate loans—net of unearned income(2)

 3.59% 3.90% 4.56% 4.42% 4.11%
           

(1)
Loans secured primarily by real estate.

(2)
The first and second quarters of 2010 exclude loans which are carried at fair value.

        Certain lending products included in the loan table above have terms that may give rise to additional credit issues. Credit cards with below-market introductory interest rates, multiple loans supported by the same collateral (e.g., home equity loans), and interest-only loans are examples of such products. However, Citi does not believe these products are material to its financial position and results and are closely managed via credit controls that mitigate the additional inherent risk.

Impaired Loans

        Impaired loans are those where Citigroup believes it is probable that it will not collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include corporate non-accrual loans as well as smaller-balance homogeneous loans whose terms have been modified due to the borrower's financial difficulties and Citigroup granted a concession to the borrower. Such modifications may include interest rate reductions and/or principal forgiveness. Valuation allowances for impaired loans are estimated considering all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value


Table of Contents

of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's original contractual effective rate, the secondary market value of the loan and the fair value of collateral less disposal costs. Consumer impaired loans exclude smaller-balance homogeneous loans that have not been modified and are carried on a non-accrual basis, as well as substantially all loans modified for periods of 12 months or less. As of June 30, 2010, loans included in those short-term programs amounted to $7 billion.

        The following table presents information about impaired loans:

In millions of dollars at year end June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

Non-accrual corporate loans

       
 

Commercial and industrial

 $6,565 $6,347 
 

Loans to financial institutions

  478  1,794 
 

Mortgage and real estate

  2,568  4,051 
 

Lease financing

  58   
 

Other

  1,367  1,287 
      
 

Total non-accrual corporate loans

 $11,036 $13,479 
      

Impaired consumer loans(1)

       
 

Mortgage and real estate

 $16,094 $10,629 
 

Installment and other

  4,440  3,853 
 

Cards

  5,028  2,453 
      
 

Total impaired consumer loans

 $25,562 $16,935 
      

Total(2)

 $36,598 $30,414 
      

Non-accrual corporate loans with valuation allowances

 $7,035 $8,578 

Impaired consumer loans with valuation allowances

  25,143  16,453 
      

Non-accrual corporate valuation allowance

 $2,355 $2,480 

Impaired consumer valuation allowance

  7,540  4,977 
      

Total valuation allowances (3)

 $9,895 $7,457 
      

(1)
Prior to 2008, Citi's financial accounting systems did not separately track impaired smaller-balance, homogeneous consumer loans whose terms were modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and it was determined that a concession was granted to the borrower. Smaller-balance consumer loans modified since January 1, 2008 amounted to $24.7 billion and $15.9 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. However, information derived from Citi's risk management systems indicates that the amounts of outstanding modified loans, including those modified prior to 2008, approximated $26.6 billion and $18.1 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

(2)
Excludes loans purchased for investment purposes.

(3)
Included in theAllowance for loan losses.

Loan Accounting Policies

        The following are the Company'sCitigroup's accounting policies for Loans, Allowanceloans, allowance for Loan Lossesloan losses and related lending activities.

Loans

        Loans are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income and unamortized deferred fees and costs except that credit card receivable balances also include accrued interest and fees. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are generally deferred and recognized as adjustments to income over the lives of the related loans.

        As described in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the CompanyCiti has elected fair value accounting for certain loans. Such loans are carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings. Interest income on such loans is recorded inInterest revenue at the contractually specified rate.

        Loans for which the fair value option has not been elected are classified upon origination or acquisition as either held-for-investment or held-for-sale. This classification is based on management's initial intent and ability with regard to those loans.

        Loans that are held-for-investment are classified asLoans, net of unearned income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and the related cash flows are included within the cash flows from investing activities category in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on the line ChangesChange in loans.loans. However, when the initial intent for holding a loan has changed from held-for-investment to held-for-sale, the loan is reclassified to held-for-sale, but the related cash flows continue to be reported in cash flows from investing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on the lineProceeds from sales and securitizations of loans.loans.

        Substantially all of the consumer loans sold or securitized by Citigroup are U.S. prime residential mortgage loans or U.S. credit card receivables. The practice of the U.S. prime mortgage business has been to sell all of its loans except for nonconformingnon-conforming adjustable rate loans. U.S. prime mortgage conforming loans are classified as held-for-sale at the time of origination. The related cash flows are classified in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in the cash flows from operating activities category on the lineChange in loans held-for-sale.held-for-sale.

        Prior to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 in 2010, U.S. credit card receivables arewere classified at origination as loans-held-for saleloans-held-for-sale to the extent that management doesdid not have the intent to hold the receivables for the foreseeable future or until maturity. ThePrior to 2010, the U.S. credit card securitization forecast for the three months following the latest balance sheet date, isexcluding replenishments, was the basis for the amount of such loans classified as held-for-sale. Cash flows related to U.S. credit card loans classified as held-for-sale at origination or acquisition are reported in the cash flows from operating activities category on the lineChange in loans held-for-sale.held-for-sale.


Table of Contents

Consumer Loansloans

        Consumer loans represent loans and leases managed primarily by theRegional Consumer Banking andLocal Consumer Lending businesses. As a general rule, interest accrual ceases for installment and real estate (both openopen- and closed end)closed-end) loans when payments are 90 days contractually past due. For credit cards and unsecured revolving loans, however, the CompanyCiti generally accrues interest until payments are 180 days past due. Loans that have been modified to grant a short-term or long-term concession to a borrower who is in financial difficulty may not be accruing interest at the time of the modification. The policy for returning such modified loans to accrual status varies by product and/or region. In most cases, a minimum number of payments (ranging from one to six) are required, while in other cases the loan is never returned to accrual status.

Citi's charge-off policies follow the general guidelines below:

        For a discussion of the impact of mortgage loan and credit card modification and forbearance programs on Citi's consumer loan businesses, see "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" below.Corporate loans

Corporate Loans

        Corporate loans represent loans and leases managed byICG or theSpecial Asset Pool.Pool. Corporate loans are identified as impaired and placed on a cash (non-accrual) basis when it is determined, based on actual experience and a forward-looking assessment of the collectability of the loan in full, that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful or when interest or principal is 90 days past due, except when the loan is well collateralizedwell-collateralized and in the process of collection. Any interest accrued on impaired corporate loans and leases is reversed at 90 days and charged against current earnings, and interest is thereafter included in earnings only to the extent actually received in cash. When there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of principal, all cash receipts are thereafter applied to reduce the recorded investment in the loan.


Table of Contents

        Impaired corporate loans and leases are written down to the extent that principal is judged to be uncollectible. Impaired collateral-dependent loans and leases, where repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying collateral and there are no other available and reliable sources of repayment, are written down to the lower of cost or collateral value. Cash-basis loans are returned to an accrual status when all contractual principal and interest amounts are reasonably assured of repayment and there is a sustained period of repayment performance in accordance with the contractual terms.

Loans Held-for-Sale

        Corporate and consumer loans that have been identified for sale are classified as loans held-for-sale included inOther assets. With the exception of certain mortgage loans for which the fair-valuefair value option has been elected, these loans are accounted for at the lower of cost or market value (LOCOM), with any write-downs or subsequent recoveries charged toOther revenue.

Allowance for Loan Losses

        Allowance for loan losses represents management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio, as well as probable losses related to large individually evaluated impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes only, and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable creditloan losses inherent in the overall portfolio. Additions to the allowance are made through the provision for creditloan losses. CreditLoan losses are deducted from the allowance, and subsequent recoveries are added. Securities received in exchange for loan claims in debt restructurings are initially recorded at fair value, with any gain or loss reflected as a recovery or charge-off to the allowance, and are subsequently accounted for as securities available-for-sale.


Table of Contents

Corporate Loansloans

        In the corporate portfolios, the allowance for loan losses includes an asset-specific component and a statistically-based component. The asset-specific component is calculated under ASC 310-10-35,Receivables—Subsequent Measurement (formerly SFAS 114) on an individual basis for larger-balance, non-homogeneous exposures representing significant individual credit exposuresloans, which are evaluated based uponconsidered impaired. An asset-specific allowance is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value (less disposal costs), or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than its carrying value. This allowance considers the borrower's overall financial condition, resources, and payment record, the prospects for support from any financially responsible guarantors (discussed further below) and, if appropriate, the realizable value of any collateral. Reserves are establishedThe asset-specific component of the allowance for thesesmaller balance impaired loans based upon an estimate of probable lossesis calculated on a pool basis considering historical loss experience. The allowance for the individual loans deemed to be impaired. This estimate may consider the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's contractual effective rate, the secondary market valueremainder of the loan or the fair value of collateral less disposal costs. The allowance for credit losses attributed to the remaining portfolio is established viacalculated under ASC 450,Contingencies (formerly SFAS 5) using a process that estimatesstatistical methodology, supplemented by management judgment. The statistical analysis considers the probableportfolio's size, remaining tenor, and credit quality as measured by internal risk ratings assigned to individual credit facilities, which reflect probability of default and loss inherent in the portfolio based upon various analyses. These analyses considergiven default. The statistical analysis considers historical default rates and historical loss severities,severity in the event of default, including historical average levels and historical variability. The result is an estimated range for inherent losses. The best estimate within the range is then determined by management's quantitative and qualitative assessment of current conditions, including general economic conditions, specific industry and geographic trends, and internal factors including portfolio concentrations, trends in internal credit quality indicators, and current and past underwriting standards.

        For both the asset-specific and the statistically-based components of the allowance for loan losses, management may incorporate guarantor support. The financial wherewithal of the guarantor is evaluated, as applicable, based on net worth, cash flow statements and personal or company financial statements which are updated and reviewed at least annually. Typically, a guarantee arrangement is used to facilitate cooperation in a restructuring situation. A guarantor's reputation and willingness to work with Citigroup is evaluated based on the historical experience with the guarantor and the knowledge of the marketplace. In the rare event that the guarantor is unwilling or unable to perform or facilitate borrower cooperation, Citi pursues a legal remedy. If Citi does not pursue a legal remedy, it is because Citi does not believe the guarantor has the financial wherewithal to perform regardless of legal action, or because there are legal limitations on simultaneously pursuing guarantors and foreclosure. A guarantor's reputation does not typically impact our decision or ability to seek performance under guarantee.

        In cases where a guarantee is a factor in the assessment of loan losses, it is typically included via adjustment to the loan's internal risk ratings, and geographic, industry, and other environmental factors.rating, which in turn is the basis for the adjustment to the statistically-based component of the allowance for loan losses. To date, it is only in rare circumstances that an impaired commercial or CRE loan is carried at a value in excess of the appraised value due to a guarantee.

        Management also considers overall portfolio indicators, including trendsWhen Citi's monitoring of the loan indicates that the guarantor's wherewithal to pay is uncertain or has deteriorated, there is either no change in internally risk-rated exposures, classified exposures, cash-basis loans, historical and forecasted write-offs, andthe risk rating, because the guarantor's credit support was never initially factored in, or the risk rating is adjusted to reflect that uncertainty or deterioration. Accordingly, a reviewguarantor's ultimate failure to perform or a lack of industry, geographic, and portfolio concentrations, including current developments within those segments. In addition, management considerslegal enforcement of the current business strategy and credit process, including credit limit setting and compliance, credit approvals,guarantee does not materially impact the allowance for loan underwriting criteria, and loan workout procedures.losses, as there is typically no further significant adjustment of the loan's risk rating at that time.

Consumer Loansloans

        ForConsumer loans, each portfolio of smaller-balance, homogeneous loans—including consumer mortgage, installment, revolving credit, and most other consumer loans—is independently evaluated for impairment. The allowance for loan losses attributed to these loans is established via a process that estimates the probable losses inherent in the specific portfolio based upon various analyses. These include migration analysis, in which historical delinquency and credit loss experience is applied to the current aging of the portfolio, together with analyses that reflect current trends and conditions.

        Management also considers overall portfolio indicators, including historical credit losses, delinquent, non-performing, and classified loans, trends in volumes and terms of loans, an evaluation of overall credit quality, the credit process, including lending policies and procedures, and economic, geographical, product and other environmental factors.

In addition, valuation allowances are determined for impaired smaller-balance homogenoushomogeneous loans whose terms have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and where it has been determined that a concession will bewas granted to the borrower. Such modifications may include interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness and/or term extensions. These allowancesWhere long-term concessions have been granted, such modifications are accounted for as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs). The allowance for loan losses for TDRs is determined in accordance with ASC-310-10-35 by comparing estimatedexpected cash flows of the loans discounted at the loans' original contractualeffective interest rates to the carrying value of the loans. Where short-term concessions have been granted, the allowance for loan losses is materially consistent with the requirements of ASC-310-10-35.

        Loans included in the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) trial period are not classified as modified under short-term or long-term programs, and the allowance for loan losses for these loans is calculated under ASC 450-20. The allowance calculation for HAMP trial loans uses default rates that assume that the borrower will not successfully complete the trial period and receive a permanent modification. As of June 30, 2010, of the loans in which the trial period has ended, 37% of the loan balances were successfully modified under HAMP, 12% were modified under the Citi Supplemental program, 6% received HAMP Re-age, (each as described under Consumer Loan Modification Programs) and 45% did not receive any modification from Citi to date.


Table of Contents

Reserve Estimates and Policies

        Management provides reserves for an estimate of probable losses inherent in the funded loan portfolio on the balance sheet in the form of an allowance for loan losses. These reserves are established in accordance with Citigroup's Credit Reserve Policies, as approved by the Audit and Risk Management Committee of the Company's Board of Directors. The Company'sCiti's Chief Risk Officer and Chief Financial Officer review the adequacy of the credit loss reserves each quarter with representatives from the Risk Management and Finance staffs for each applicable business area.

        During these reviews, theThe above-mentioned representatives covering the business areaareas having classifiably managed portfolios (that is, portfolios, where internal credit-risk ratings are assigned which are primarily(primarilyICG, Regional Consumer Banking andLocal Consumer Lending) and, or modified consumer loans, where a concession wasconcessions were granted due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and present recommended reserve balances for their funded and unfunded lending portfolios along with supporting quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data include:

        In addition, representatives from both the Risk Management and Finance staffs that cover business areas that have delinquency-managed portfolios containing smaller homogeneous loans (primarily the non-commercial lending areas ofConsumer Banking) present their recommended reserve balances based upon leading credit indicators, including loan delinquencies and changes in portfolio size as well as economic trends including housing prices, unemployment and GDP. This methodology is applied separately for each individual product within each different geographic region in which these portfolios exist.

        This evaluation process is subject to numerous estimates and judgments. The frequency of default, risk ratings, loss recovery rates, the size and diversity of individual large credits, and the ability of borrowers with foreign currency obligations to obtain the foreign currency necessary for orderly debt servicing, among other things, are all taken into account during this review. Changes in these estimates could have a direct impact on the credit costs in any quarter and could result in a change in the allowance. Changes to the reserve flow through the Consolidated Statement of Income on the lineslineProvision for loan losseslosses. andProvision for unfunded lending commitments.

Allowance for Unfunded Lending Commitments

        A similar approach to the allowance for loan losses is used for calculating a reserve for the expected losses related to unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit. This reserve is classified on the balance sheet inOther liabilities. Changes to the allowance for unfunded lending commitments flow through the Consolidated Statement of Income on the lineProvision for unfunded lending commitments.


Table of Contents


Details of Credit Loss Experience

In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009(1)
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

 $35,940 $31,703 $29,616 $24,005 $20,777 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

 $48,746 $36,033 $36,416 $35,940 $31,703 
                       

Provision for loan losses

Provision for loan losses

 

Provision for loan losses

 
 

Consumer

 $7,321 $10,010 $8,010 $8,592 $7,831  

Consumer

 $6,672 $8,244 $7,077 $7,321 $10,010 
 

Corporate

 1,450 2,223 1,905 3,579 1,112  

Corporate

 (149) 122 764 1,450 2,223 
                       

 $8,771 $12,233 $9,915 $12,171 $8,943 

 $6,523 $8,366 $7,841 $8,771 $12,233 
                       

Gross credit losses

Gross credit losses

 

Gross credit losses

 

Consumer

Consumer

 

Consumer

 

In U.S. offices

 $4,459 $4,694 $4,124 $3,610 $3,073 

In U.S. offices

 $6,494 $6,942 $4,360 $4,459 $4,694 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 2,406 2,305 1,936 1,818 1,914 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 1,774 1,797 2,187 2,406 2,305 

Corporate

Corporate

 

Corporate

 

In U.S. offices

 1,101 1,216 1,176 364 156 

In U.S. offices

 563 404 478 1,101 1,216 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 483 558 424 756 200 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 290 155 877 483 558 
                       

 $8,449 $8,773 $7,660 $6,548 $5,343 

 $9,121 $9,298 $7,902 $8,449 $8,773 
                       

Credit recoveries

Credit recoveries

 

Credit recoveries

 

Consumer

Consumer

 

Consumer

 

In U.S. offices

 $149 $131 $136 $132 $137 

In U.S. offices

 $460 $419 $160 $149 $131 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 288 261 213 219 252 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 318 300 327 288 261 

Corporate

Corporate

 

Corporate

 

In U.S. offices

 30 4 1 2 3 

In U.S. offices

 307 177 246 30 4 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 13 22 28 52 31 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 74 18 34 13 22 
                       

 $480 $418 $378 $405 $423 

 $1,159 $914 $767 $480 $418 
                       

Net credit losses

Net credit losses

 

Net credit losses

 

In U.S. offices

 $5,381 $5,775 $5,163 $3,840 $3,089 

In U.S. offices

 $6,290 $6,750 $4,432 $5,381 $5,775 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 2,588 2,580 2,119 2,303 1,831 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 1,672 1,634 2,703 2,588 2,580 
                       

Total

Total

 $7,969 $8,355 $7,282 $6,143 $4,920 

Total

 $7,962 $8,384 $7,135 $7,969 $8,355 
                       

Other—net(6)(5)

Other—net(6)(5)

 $(326)$359 $(546)$(417)$(795)

Other—net(6)(5)

 $(1,110)$12,731 $(1,089)$(326)$359 
                       

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(7)(6)

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(7)(6)

 $36,416 $35,940 $31,703 $29,616 $24,005 

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(7)(6)

 $46,197 $48,746 $36,033 $36,416 $35,940 
                       

Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans

Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans

 5.85% 5.60% 4.82% 4.27% 3.35%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans

 6.72% 6.80% 6.09% 5.85% 5.60%

Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(8)(7)

Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(8)(7)

 $1,074 $1,082 $947 $887 $957 

Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(8)(7)

 $1,054 $1,122 $1,157 $1,074 $1,082 
                       

Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments

Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments

 $37,490 $37,022 $32,650 $30,503 $24,962 

Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments

 $47,251 $49,868 $37,190 $37,490 $37,022 
                       

Net consumer credit losses

Net consumer credit losses

 $6,428 $6,607 $5,711 $5,077 $4,598 

Net consumer credit losses

 $7,490 $8,020 $6,060 $6,428 $6,607 

As a percentage of average consumer loans

As a percentage of average consumer loans

 5.66% 5.88% 4.95% 4.12% 3.57%

As a percentage of average consumer loans

 5.75% 6.04% 5.43% 5.66% 5.88%
                       

Net corporate credit losses

Net corporate credit losses

 $1,541 $1,748 $1,571 $1,066 $322 

Net corporate credit losses

 $472 $364 $1,075 $1,541 $1,748 

As a percentage of average corporate loans

As a percentage of average corporate loans

 0.82% 0.89% 0.79% 0.60% 0.15%

As a percentage of average corporate loans

 0.25% 0.19% 0.61% 0.82% 0.89%
                       

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(9)(8)

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(9)(8)

 

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(9)(8)

 

Citicorp

 $10,286 $10,046 $8,520 $7,684 $6,651 

Citicorp

 $17,524 $18,503 $10,731 $10,956 $10,676 

Citi Holdings

 26,130 25,894 23,183 21,932 17,354 

Citi Holdings

 28,673 30,243 25,302 25,460 25,264 
                       
 

Total Citigroup

 $36,416 $35,940 $31,703 $29,616 $24,005  

Total Citigroup

 $46,197 $48,746 $36,033 $36,416 $35,940 
                       

Allowance by type

Allowance by type

 

Consumer(9)

 $39,578 $41,422 $28,397 $28,420 $27,969 

Corporate

 6,619 7,324 7,636 7,996 7,971 
           
 

Total Citigroup

 $46,197 $48,746 $36,033 $36,416 $35,940 
           

(1)
Reclassified to conformThe second quarter of 2010 includes a reduction of approximately $230 million related to the current period's presentation.transfers to held-for-sale of the Canada Cards portfolio and an Auto portfolio. Additionally, the 2010 second quarter includes a reduction of approximately $480 million related to the sale or transfers to held-for-sale of U.S. real estate lending loans.

(2)
The first quarter of 2010 primarily includes $13.4 billion related to the impact of consolidating entities in connection with Citi's adoption of SFAS 166/167 (see discussion on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and reductions of approximately $640 million related to the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of U.S. and U.K. real estate lending loans.

(3)
The fourth quarter of 2009 includes a reduction of approximately $335 million related to securitizations and approximately $400 million related to the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of U.S. real estate lending loans.

(4)
The third quarter of 2009 primarily includes a reduction to the credit loss reserves of $562 million related to the transfer of the U.K. Cards portfolio to held-for-sale, partially offset by increases related to FX translation.

(3)(5)
The second quarter of 2009 primarily includes increases to the credit loss reserves, primarily related to FX translation.

(4)
The first quarter of 2009 primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of $213 million related to securitizations and reductions of approximately $320 million primarily related to FX translation.

(5)
The fourth quarter of 2008 primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of approximately $400 million primarily related to FX translation.

(6)
The third quarter of 2008 primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of $23 million related to securitizations, reductions of $244 million related to the sale of Citigroup's German Retail Banking Operation and reductions of approximately $500 million related to FX translation.

(7)
Included in the allowance for loan losses are reserves for loans which have been subject to troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) of $7,320 million, $6,926 million, $4,819 million, $4,587 million $3,810 million, $2,760 million, $2,180 million, and $1,443$3,810 million as of June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, March 31, 2009, December 31, 2008, and September 30, 2008, respectively.

(8)(7)
Represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded corporate lending commitments and letters of credit recorded inOther Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

(9)(8)
Allowance for loan losses represents management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio, as well as probable losses related to large individually evaluated impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings.TDRs. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes only, and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the overall portfolio.

(9)
Included in the second quarter of 2010 consumer loan loss reserve is $20.6 billion related to Citi's global credit card portfolio. See discussion on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents


Non-Accrual Assets

        The table below summarizes the Company'sCitigroup's view of non-accrual loans as of the periods indicated. Non-accrual loans are loans in which the borrower has fallen behind in interest payments or, for corporate loans, where the CompanyCiti has determined that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful, and which are therefore considered impaired. As discussed under "Accounting"Loan Accounting Policies" above, in situations where the CompanyCiti reasonably expects that only a portion of the principal and interest owed will ultimately be collected, all payments received are reflected as a reduction of principal and not as interest income. There is no industry-wide definition of non-accrual assets, however, and as such, analysis againstacross the industry is not always comparable.

        As discussed above under "Third Quarter of 2009 Management Summary," the Company has been actively moving corporate loans into the non-accrual category at earlier stages of anticipated distress.        Corporate non-accrual loans may still be current on interest payments, however. Ofpayments. Consistent with industry conventions, Citi generally accrues interest on credit card loans until such loans are charged-off, which typically occurs at 180 days' contractual delinquency. As such, the total portfolio of non-accrual corporate loans as of September 30, 2009, over two-thirds are current and continue to make their contractual payments.loan disclosures in this section do not include credit card loans.

Non-accrual loans

In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

Citicorp

Citicorp

 $5,131 $5,314 $3,829 $3,193 $2,408 

Citicorp

 $4,510 $5,024 $5,353 $5,507 $5,395 

Citi Holdings

Citi Holdings

 27,553 22,932 22,282 19,104 11,135 

Citi Holdings

 20,302 23,544 26,387 27,177 22,851 
                       

Total Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $32,684 $28,246 $26,111 $22,297 $13,543 

Total non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $24,812 $28,568 $31,740 $32,684 $28,246 
                       

Corporate non-accrual loans(1)

 

Corporate NAL(1)

Corporate NAL(1)

 

North America

North America

 $5,263 $3,499 $3,789 $2,660 $851 

North America

 $4,411 $5,660 $5,621 $5,263 $3,499 

EMEA

EMEA

 7,969 7,690 6,479 6,330 1,406 

EMEA

 5,508 5,834 6,308 7,969 7,690 

Latin America

Latin America

 416 230 300 229 125 

Latin America

 570 608 569 416 230 

Asia

Asia

 1,128 1,013 639 513 357 

Asia

 547 830 981 1,061 1,056 
                       

 $14,776 $12,432 $11,207 $9,732 $2,739 

 $11,036 $12,932 $13,479 $14,709 $12,475 
                       

Citicorp

 $2,999 $3,045 $1,825 $1,364 $605 

Citicorp

 $2,573 $2,975 $3,238 $3,300 $3,159 

Citi Holdings

 $11,777 $9,387 $9,382 $8,368 $2,134 

Citi Holdings

 8,463 9,957 10,241 11,409 9,316 
                       

 $14,776 $12,432 $11,207 $9,732 $2,739 

 $11,036 $12,932 $13,479 $14,709 $12,475 
                       

Consumer non-accrual loans(1)

 

North America(2)

 $14,609 $12,154 $11,687 $9,617 $7,941 

Consumer NAL(1)

Consumer NAL(1)

 

North America

North America

 $11,289 $12,966 $15,111 $14,609 $12,154 

EMEA

EMEA

 1,314 1,356 1,128 948 904 

EMEA

 690 790 1,159 1,314 1,356 

Latin America

Latin America

 1,342 1,520 1,338 1,290 1,343 

Latin America

 1,218 1,246 1,340 1,342 1,520 

Asia

Asia

 643 784 751 710 616 

Asia

 579 634 651 710 741 
                       

 $17,908 $15,814 $14,904 $12,565 $10,804 

 $13,776 $15,636 $18,261 $17,975 $15,771 
                       

Citicorp

 $2,132 $2,269 $2,004 $1,829 $1,803 

Citicorp

 $1,937 $2,049 $2,115 $2,207 $2,236 

Citi Holdings

 15,776 13,545 12,900 10,736 9,001 

Citi Holdings

 11,839 13,587 16,146 15,768 13,535 
                       

 $17,908 $15,814 $14,904 $12,565 $10,804 

 $13,776 $15,636 $18,261 $17,975 $15,771 
                       

(1)
Excludes purchased distressed loans as they are generally accreting interest.interest until write-off. The carrying value of these loans was $672 million at June 30, 2010, $804 million at March 31, 2010, $920 million at December 31, 2009, $1.267 billion at September 30, 2009 and $1.509 billion at June 30, 2009, $1.328 billion at March 31, 2009, $1.510 billion at December 31, 2008, and $1.550 billion at September 30, 2008.

(2)
The recent increases reflect the impact of the deterioration in the U.S. consumer real estate market.2009.

Table of Contents

Non-Accrual Assets (Continued)(continued)

        The table below summarizes the Company'sCitigroup's other real estate owned (OREO) assets. This represents the carrying value of all property acquired by foreclosure or other legal proceedings when the CompanyCiti has taken possession of the collateral.

OREOOREO 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 OREO 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

Citicorp

Citicorp

 $284 $291 $307 $371 $425 

Citicorp

 $870 $881 $874 $284 $291 

Citi Holdings

Citi Holdings

 585 664 854 1,022 1,092 

Citi Holdings

 790 632 615 585 664 

Corporate/Other

Corporate/Other

 15 14 41 40 85 

Corporate/Other

 13 8 11 15 14 
                       

Total OREO

 $884 $969 $1,202 $1,433 $1,602 

Total OREO

 $1,673 $1,521 $1,500 $884 $969 
                       

North America

North America

 $682 $789 $1,115 $1,349 $1,525 

North America

 $1,428 $1,291 $1,294 $682 $789 

EMEA

EMEA

 105 97 65 66 61 

EMEA

 146 134 121 105 97 

Latin America

Latin America

 40 29 20 16 14 

Latin America

 43 51 45 40 29 

Asia

Asia

 57 54 2 2 2 

Asia

 56 45 40 57 54 
                       

 $884 $969 $1,202 $1,433 $1,602 

 $1,673 $1,521 $1,500 $884 $969 
                       

Other repossessed assets(1)

Other repossessed assets(1)

 $76 $72 $78 $78 $81 

Other repossessed assets(1)

 $55 $64 $73 $76 $72 
                       

(1)
Primarily transportation equipment, carried at lower of cost or fair value, less costs to sell.

Non-accrual assets—Total Citigroup 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 

Corporate non-accrual loans

 $14,776 $12,432 $11,207 $9,732 $2,739 

Consumer non-accrual loans

  17,908  15,814  14,904  12,565  10,804 
            
 

Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $32,684 $28,246 $26,111 $22,297 $13,543 
            

OREO

 $884 $969 $1,202 $1,433 $1,602 

Other repossessed assets

  76  72  78  78  81 
            
 

Non-accrual assets (NAA)

 $33,644 $29,287 $27,391 $23,808 $15,226 
            

NAL as a % of total loans

  5.25% 4.40% 3.97% 3.21% 1.89%

NAA as a % of total assets

  1.78% 1.59% 1.50% 1.23% 0.74%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL(1)

  111% 127% 121% 133% 177%
            
Non-accrual assets (NAA)—Total Citigroup 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

Corporate NAL

 $11,036 $12,932 $13,479 $14,709 $12,475 

Consumer NAL

  13,776  15,636  18,261  17,975  15,771 
            
 

NAL

 $24,812 $28,568 $31,740 $32,684 $28,246 
            

OREO

 $1,673 $1,521 $1,500 $884 $969 

Other repossessed assets

  55  64  73  76  72 
            
 

NAA

 $26,540 $30,153 $33,313 $33,644 $29,287 
            

NAL as a percentage of total loans

  3.58% 3.96% 5.37% 5.25% 4.40%

NAA as a percentage of total assets

  1.37% 1.51% 1.79% 1.78% 1.58%

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1)

  186% 171% 114% 111% 127%
            


NAA—Total Citicorp 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

NAL

 $4,510 $5,024 $5,353 $5,507 $5,395 

OREO

  870  881  874  284  291 

Other repossessed assets

  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
            
 

Non-accrual assets (NAA)

 $5,380 $5,905 $6,227 $5,791 $5,686 
            

NAA as a percentage of total assets

  0.44% 0.48% 0.55% 0.54% 0.54%

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1)

  389% 368% 200% 199% 198%
            

NAA—Total Citi Holdings

                

NAL

 $20,302 $23,544 $26,387 $27,177 $22,851 

OREO

  790  632  615  585  664 

Other repossessed assets

  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
            
 

NAA

 $21,092 $24,176 $27,002 $27,762 $23,515 
            

NAA as a percentage of total assets

  4.54% 4.81% 5.54% 4.99% 4.04%

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1)

  141% 128% 96% 94% 111%
            

(1)
The $6.403allowance for loan losses includes the allowance for credit card ($20.6 billion ofat June 30, 2010) and purchased distressed loans, while the non-accrual loans transferred from the held-for-sale portfolioexclude credit card balances and purchased distressed loans, as these generally continue to the held-for-investment portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2008 were marked to market at the transfer date and, therefore, no allowance was necessary at the time of the transfer. $2.426 billion of the par value of the loans reclassified was written off prior to transfer.accrue interest until write-off.

Non-accrual assets—Total Citicorp 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 

Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $5,131 $5,314 $3,829 $3,193 $2,408 

OREO

  284  291  307  371  425 

Other repossessed assets

  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
            
 

Non-accrual assets (NAA)

 $5,415 $5,605 $4,136 $3,564 $2,833 
            

NAA as a % of total assets

  0.53% 0.57% 0.43% 0.36% 0.24%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL

  200% 189% 223% 241% 276%
            

Non-accrual assets—Total Citi Holdings

                

Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $27,553 $22,932 $22,282 $19,104 $11,135 

OREO

  585  664  854  1,022  1,092 

Other repossessed assets

  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
            
 

Non-accrual assets (NAA)

 $28,138 $23,596 $23,136 $20,126 $12,227 
            

NAA as a % of total assets

  4.56% 3.64% 3.49% 2.81% 1.58%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL

  95% 113% 104% 115% 156%
            

N/A    Not available at the Citicorp or Citi Holdings level.


Table of Contents

Renegotiated Loans

        The following table presents loans which were modified in a troubled debt restructuring.

In millions of dollars June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

Corporate renegotiated loans(1)

       

In U.S. offices

       
 

Commercial and industrial

 $254 $203 
 

Mortgage and real estate

  169   
 

Other

  143   
      

 $566 $203 
      

In offices outside the U.S.

       
 

Commercial and industrial

 $192 $145 
 

Mortgage and real estate

  7  2 
 

Other

     
      

 $199 $147 
      

Total corporate renegotiated loans

 $765 $350 
      

Consumer renegotiated loans(2)(3)(4)(5)

       

In U.S. offices

       
 

Mortgage and real estate

 $16,582 $11,165 
 

Cards

  4,044  992 
 

Installment and other

  2,180  2,689 
      

 $22,806 $14,846 
      

In offices outside the U.S.

       
 

Mortgage and real estate

 $734 $415 
 

Cards

  985  1,461 
 

Installment and other

  2,189  1,401 
      

  3,908  3,277 
      

Total consumer renegotiated loans

 $26,714 $18,123 
      

(1)
Includes $476 million and $317 million of non-accrual loans included in the non-accrual assets table above, at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

(2)
Includes $2,257 million and $2,000 million of non-accrual loans included in the non-accrual assets table above, at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

(3)
Includes $27 million of commercial real estate loans at June 30, 2010.

(4)
Includes $92 million and $16 million of commercial loans at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

(5)
Smaller balance homogeneous loans were derived from Citi's risk management systems.

Representations and Warranties

        When selling a loan, Citi makes various representations and warranties relating to, among other things, the following:

        The specific representations and warranties made by Citi depend on the nature of the transaction and the requirements of the buyer. Market conditions and credit-rating agency requirements may also affect representations and warranties and the other provisions Citi may agree to in loan sales.

        Citi's representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits in amount or time of coverage. However, contractual liability arises only when the representations and warranties are breached and generally only when a loss results from the breach. In the event of a breach of these representations and warranties, Citi may be required to either repurchase the mortgage loans (generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest), with the identified defects, or indemnify ("make whole") the investors for their losses.

        For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, almost half of Citi's repurchases and make-whole payments were attributable to misrepresentation of facts by either the borrower or a third party (e.g., income, employment, debts, FICO, etc.), up from approximately a quarter for the respective periods in 2009. In addition, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, approximately 20% of Citi's repurchases and make-whole payments related to appraisal issues (e.g., an error or misrepresentation of value), up from approximately 9% for the respective 2009 periods. The third largest category of repurchases and make-whole payments in 2010, to date, related to program requirements (e.g., a loan that does not meet investor guidelines such as contractual interest rate), which was the second largest category in the first half of 2009. There is not a meaningful difference in incurred or estimated loss for each type of defect.

        In the case of a repurchase, Citi will bear any subsequent credit loss on the mortgage loan and the loan is typically considered a credit-impaired loan and accounted for under SOP 03-3, "Accounting for Certain Loans and Debt Securities, Acquired in a Transfer" (now incorporated into ASC 310-30,Receivables—Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality). To date, these repurchases have not had a material impact on Citi's non-performing loan statistics because credit-impaired purchased SOP 03-3 loans are not included in non-accrual loans.

        As evidenced by the tables below, to date, Citigroup's repurchases have primarily been from the government sponsored entities (GSEs).

        The unpaid principal balance of repurchased loans for representation and warranty claims for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:

 
 Three months ended June 30, 
 
 2010 2009 
In millions of dollars Unpaid Principal
Balance
 Unpaid Principal
Balance
 

GSEs

 $63 $83 

Private investors

  8  4 
      

Total

 $71 $87 
      

        The unpaid principal balance of repurchased loans for representation and warranty claims for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:

 
 Six months ended June 30, 
 
 2010 2009 
In millions of dollars Unpaid Principal
Balance
 Unpaid Principal
Balance
 

GSEs

 $150 $156 

Private investors

  12  10 
      

Total

 $162 $166 
      

Table of Contents

        In addition, Citi recorded make-whole payments of $43 million and $17 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively, and $66 million and $24 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.

        Citi has recorded a reserve for its exposure to losses from the obligation to repurchase previously sold loans (repurchase reserve) that is included inOther liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The repurchase reserve is net of reimbursements estimated to be received by Citi for indemnification agreements relating to previous acquisitions of mortgage servicing rights. In the case of a repurchase of a credit-impaired SOP 03-3 loan, the difference between the loan's fair value and unpaid principal balance at the time of the repurchase is recorded as a utilization of the repurchase reserve. Make-whole payments to the investor are also treated as utilizations and charged directly against the reserve. The repurchase reserve is estimated when Citi sells loans (recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale, which is included inOther revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income) and is updated quarterly. Any change in estimate is recorded inOther revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

        The repurchase reserve is calculated separately by sales vintage (i.e., the year the loans were sold) based on various assumptions. While substantially all of Citi's current loan sales are with GSEs, with which Citi has considerable historical experience, these assumptions contain a level of uncertainty and risk that, if different from actual results, could have a material impact on the reserve amounts. The most significant assumptions used to calculate the reserve levels are as follows:

        In Citi's experience to date, as stated above, the request for loan documentation packages is an early indicator of a potential claim. During 2009, loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims increased. In addition, Citi's loss severity estimates increased during 2009 due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and its experience with actual losses at such time. As set forth in the tables below, these factors contributed to changes in estimates for the repurchase reserve amounting to $103 million and $247 million for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.

        During the second quarter of 2010, loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims further increased. In addition, there was an overall deterioration in the other key assumptions due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and Citi's continued experience with actual losses. These factors contributed to the $347 million change in estimate for the repurchase reserve in the quarter.

        As indicated above, the repurchase reserve is calculated by sales vintage. The majority of the repurchases in 2010 were from the 2006 through 2008 sales vintages and, in 2009, were from the 2006 and 2007 vintages, which also represent the vintages with the largest loss-given-repurchase. An insignificant percentage of 2010 and 2009 repurchases were from vintages prior to 2006, and Citi currently anticipates that this percentage will decrease, as those vintages are later in the credit cycle. Although early in the credit cycle, to date, Citi has experienced improved repurchase and loss-given-repurchase statistics from the 2009 and 2010 vintages.


Table of Contents

        The activity in the repurchase reserve for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:

 
 Three months ended June 30, 
In millions of dollars 2010 2009 

Balance, beginning of period

 $450 $218 

Additions for new sales

  4  13 

Change in estimate

  347  103 

Utilizations

  (74) (55)
      

Balance, end of period

 $727 $279 
      

        The activity in the repurchase reserve for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009 was as follows:

 
 Six months ended June 30, 
In millions of dollars 2010 2009 

Balance, beginning of period

 $482 $75 

Additions for new sales

  9  19 

Change in estimate

  347  247 

Utilizations

  (111) (62)
      

Balance, end of period

 $727 $279 
      

        Citi does not believe a meaningful range of reasonably possible loss related to its repurchase reserve can be determined.

        Projected future repurchases are calculated, in part, based on the level of unresolved claims at quarter-end as well as trends in claims being made by investors. For GSEs, the response to the repurchase claim is required within 90 days of the claim receipt. If Citi did not respond within 90 days, the claim would then be discussed between Citi and the GSE. For private investors, the time period for responding is governed by the individual sale agreement. If the specified timeframe is exceeded, the investor may choose to initiate legal action.

        As would be expected, as the trend in claims and inventory increases, Citi's reserve for repurchases typically increases. Included in Citi's current reserve estimate is an assumption that repurchase claims will remain at elevated levels for the foreseeable future, although the actual number of claims may differ and is subject to uncertainty. Furthermore, approximately half of the repurchase claims in Citi's recent experience have been successfully appealed and resulted in no loss to Citi.

        The number of unresolved claims by type of claimant as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, was as follows:

Number of claims June 30
2010
 December 31
2009
 

GSEs

  4,166  2,575 

Private investors

  214  309 

Mortgage insurers(1)

  98  204 
      

Total

  4,478  3,088 
      

(1)
Represents the insurer's rejection of a claim for loss reimbursement that has yet to be resolved. To the extent that mortgage insurance will not cover the claim on a loan, Citi may have to make-whole the GSE or private investor.

Table of Contents


Consumer Loan Details

Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts Net Credit Losses and Ratios
Table presents consumer credit information on a held basis.



 Total loans(1) 90 days or more past due(2)  
 Net credit losses(2) 
 Total loans(6) 90+ days past due(1) 30-89 days past due(1) 
In millions of dollars, except total and average loan amounts in billions
 Sept.
2009
 Sept.
2009
 June
2009
 Sept.
2008
 Average loans(1)
3Q
2009
 3Q
2009
 2Q
2009
 3Q
2008
 
In millions of dollars, except EOP loan amounts in billionsIn millions of dollars, except EOP loan amounts in billions Jun.
2010
 Jun.
2010
 Mar.
2010
 Jun.
2009
 Jun.
2010
 Mar.
2010
 Jun.
2009
 

Citicorp

Citicorp

 

Citicorp

 

Total

Total

 $124.3 $1,909 $2,218 $1,634 $120.5 $1,426 $1,392 $1,096 

Total

 $218.5 $3,733 $3,937 $4,289 $3,858 $4,294 $4,328 

Ratio

   1.71% 1.78% 1.97% 1.77% 1.94% 1.99%

Ratio

   1.54% 1.89% 1.29%   4.70% 4.78% 3.35%                

Retail Bank

Retail Bank

 

Retail Bank

 

Total

 80.0 749 831 616 77.7 379 414 317 

Total

 109.1 804 782 767 1,131 1,200 1,084 
 

Ratio

   0.94% 1.10% 0.77%   1.93% 2.22% 1.51% 

Ratio

   0.74% 0.71% 0.74% 1.04% 1.08% 1.05%

North America

 7.5 93 97 54 7.4 79 86 35 

North America

 30.2 245 142 97 241 236 87 
 

Ratio

   1.24% 1.35% 1.10%   4.23% 4.85% 3.03% 

Ratio

   0.81% 0.45% 0.29% 0.80% 0.75% 0.26%

EMEA

 5.7 62 70 35 5.7 84 74 36 

EMEA

 4.3 50 52 70 145 182 235 
 

Ratio

   1.09% 1.23% 0.48%   5.84% 5.34% 1.99% 

Ratio

   1.16% 1.06% 1.23% 3.37% 3.71% 4.12%

Latin America

 17.7 324 360 323 16.9 113 140 147 

Latin America

 19.6 308 352 316 305 346 337 
 

Ratio

   1.83% 2.18% 1.89%   2.65% 3.43% 3.29% 

Ratio

   1.57% 1.81% 1.92% 1.56% 1.78% 2.04%

Asia

 49.1 270 304 204 47.7 103 114 99 

Asia

 55.0 201 236 284 440 436 425 
 

Ratio

   0.55% 0.66% 0.40%   0.85% 0.99% 0.73% 

Ratio

   0.37% 0.43% 0.60% 0.80% 0.80% 0.90%

Citi-Branded Cards(3)

 
               

Citi-Branded Cards(2)(3)

Citi-Branded Cards(2)(3)

 

Total

 109.4 2,929 3,155 3,522 2,727 3,094 3,244 

Total

 44.3 1,160 1,387 1,018 42.8 1,047 978 779  

Ratio

   2.68% 2.86% 3.07% 2.49% 2.81% 2.83%
 

Ratio

   2.61% 3.29% 2.20%   9.71% 9.32% 6.58%

North America

 77.2 2,130 2,304 2,366 1,828 2,145 2,024 

North America(4)

 12.4 241 248 118 11.3 201 219 109  

Ratio

   2.76% 2.97% 2.84% 2.37% 2.76% 2.43%
 

Ratio

   1.94% 2.21% 0.94%   7.06% 7.51% 3.67%

EMEA

 2.6 72 77 99 90 113 146 

EMEA

 3.0 85 94 35 3.0 55 47 19  

Ratio

   2.77% 2.66% 3.54% 3.46% 3.90% 5.21%
 

Ratio

   2.83% 3.35% 1.12%   7.43% 6.70% 2.45%

Latin America

 12.0 481 510 707 485 475 693 

Latin America

 11.9 519 695 603 11.9 543 472 493  

Ratio

   4.01% 4.21% 5.84% 4.04% 3.93% 5.73%
 

Ratio

   4.36% 5.89% 4.31%   18.05% 16.22% 13.16%

Asia

 17.6 246 264 350 324 361 381 

Asia

 17.0 315 350 262 16.6 248 240 158  

Ratio

   1.40% 1.51% 2.12% 1.84% 2.06% 2.31%
 

Ratio

   1.85% 2.15% 1.57%   5.93% 6.00% 3.63%                

Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending

Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending

 

Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending

 

Total

 310.8 18,538 16,486 11,294 319.6 4,929 5,156 3,487 

Total

 286.3 14,371 16,808 15,869 11,201 12,236 14,371 
 

Ratio

   5.96% 5.10% 3.13%   6.12% 6.25% 3.83% 

Ratio

   5.24% 5.66% 4.80% 4.08% 4.12% 4.35%

International

 37.3 1,447 1,535 1,033 39.5 973 976 737 

International

 24.6 724 953 1,551 939 1,059 1,845 
 

Ratio

   3.88% 3.81% 2.21%   9.77% 9.69% 6.02% 

Ratio

   2.94% 3.44% 3.93% 3.82% 3.82% 4.67%

North America Retail Partners Cards(3)(4)

 21.7 885 917 810 23.7 867 872 646 

North America retail partner cards(2)(3)

 50.2 2,004 2,385 2,590 2,150 2,374 2,749 
 

Ratio

   4.08% 4.06% 2.73%   14.51% 14.82% 8.80% 

Ratio

   3.99% 4.38% 4.09% 4.28% 4.36% 4.34%

North America (excluding Cards)

 251.8 16,206 14,034 9,451 256.4 3,089 3,308 2,104 

North America (excluding cards)(4)(5)

 211.5 11,643 13,470 11,728 8,112 8,803 9,777 
 

Ratio

   6.44% 5.39% 3.33%   4.78% 4.98% 2.94% 

Ratio

   5.84% 6.27% 5.16% 4.07% 4.10% 4.30%
                                 

Total Citigroup (excluding Special Asset Pool)

Total Citigroup (excluding Special Asset Pool)

 $435.1 $20,447 $18,704 $12,928 $440.1 $6,355 $6,548 $4,583 

Total Citigroup (excludingSpecial Asset Pool)

 $504.8 $18,104 $20,745 $20,158 $15,059 $16,530 $18,699 
 

Ratio

   4.70% 4.24% 2.66%   5.73% 5.87% 3.70% 

Ratio

   3.67% 4.01% 3.68% 3.06% 3.19% 3.41%
                                 

(1)
Total loans and average loans exclude interest and fees on credit cards.

(2)
The ratios of 90 days or more past due and net credit losses30 to 89 days past due are calculated based on end-of-period loans and average loans, respectively, both net of unearned income.loans.

(3)(2)
The 90 days or more past due balancebalances for Citi-branded cards and retail partnerspartner cards are generally still accruing interest. As discussed under "Loan Accounting Policies" above, the Company'sCitigroup's policy is generally to accrue interest on credit card loans until 180 days past due, unless notification of bankruptcy filing has been received earlier.

(4)(3)
In September 2009,The above information presents consumer credit information on a managed basis. Citigroup adopted SFAS 166/167 effective January 1, 2010. As a result, beginning in the first quarter of 2010, there is no longer a difference between reported and managed delinquencies. Prior quarters' managed delinquencies are included herein for comparative purposes to the 2010 delinquencies. Managed basis reporting historically impacted theNorth America Regional Consumer BankingCiti-branded cards and theLocal Consumer Lendingretail partner cards businessesbusinesses. The historical disclosures reflect the impact from credit card securitizations only. See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(4)
The 90 days or more and 30 to 89 days past due and related ratios forNorth America changed their bankruptcyLCL (excluding cards) exclude U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies since the potential loss recognition practice from 10predominantly resides within the U.S. agencies. The amounts excluded for loans 90 days after receiptor more past due and (end-of-period loans) for each period are: $5.0 billion ($9.4 billion), $5.2 billion ($9.0 billion), and $4.3 billion ($8.7 billion) as of notificationJune 30, 2010, March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively. The amounts excluded for loans 30 to 89 days past due (end-of-period loans have the same adjustment as above) for each period are: $1.6 billion, $1.2 billion, and $0.7 billion, as of June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively.

(5)
The June 30, 2010 and March 31, 2010 loans 90 days or more past due and 30-89 days past due and related ratios for North America (excluding cards) excludes $2.6 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively, of loans that are carried at fair value.

(6)
Total loans include interest and fees on credit cards.

Table of Contents


Consumer Loan Net Credit Losses and Ratios

 
 Average
loans(1)
 Net credit losses(2) 
In millions of dollars, except average loan amounts in billions 2Q10 2Q10 1Q10 2Q09 

Citicorp

             

Total

 $217.8 $2,922 $3,040 $1,406 
 

Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

         1,837 
 

Managed NCL

    $2,922 $3,040 $3,243 
 

Ratio

     5.38% 5.57% 6.01%
          

Retail Bank

             
 

Total

  109.3  304  289  428 
  

Ratio

     1.12% 1.07% 1.66%
 

North America

  30.7  79  73  88 
  

Ratio

     1.03% 0.92% 1.01%
 

EMEA

  4.5  46  47  74 
  

Ratio

     4.10% 3.81% 5.30%
 

Latin America

  19.4  96  91  138 
  

Ratio

     1.98% 1.99% 3.40%
 

Asia

  54.7  83  78  128 
  

Ratio

     0.61% 0.59% 1.10%
          

Citi-Branded Cards

             
 

Total

  108.5  2,618  2,751  978 
  

Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

         1,837 
  

Managed NCL

     2,618  2,751  2,815 
  

Ratio

     9.68% 9.96% 10.02%
 

North America

  76.2  2,047  2,084  219 
  

Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

         1,837 
  

Managed NCL

     2,047  2,084  2,056 
  

Ratio

     10.77% 10.67% 10.08%
 

EMEA

  2.7  39  50  47 
  

Ratio

     5.79% 6.99% 6.73%
 

Latin America

  12.0  361  418  472 
  

Ratio

     12.07% 14.01% 15.91%
 

Asia

  17.6  171  199  240 
  

Ratio

     3.90% 4.53% 5.94%
          

Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending

             
 

Total

  301.7  4,535  4,938  5,144 
  

Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

         1,278 
  

Managed NCL

     4,535  4,938  6,422 
  

Ratio

     6.03% 6.30% 7.48%
 

International

  26.1  495  612  962 
  

Ratio

     7.61% 8.27% 9.72%
 

North America retail partner cards

  53.1  1,775  1,932  872 
  

Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

         1,278 
  

Managed NCL

     1,775  1,932  2,150 
  

Ratio

     13.41% 13.72% 13.58%
 

North America (excluding cards)

  222.5  2,265  2,394  3,310 
  

Ratio

     4.08% 4.20% 5.50%
          

Total Citigroup (excludingSpecial Asset Pool)

 $519.5 $7,457 $7,978 $6,550 
  

Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

         3,115 
  

Managed NCL

     7,457  7,978  9,665 
  

Ratio

     5.76% 6.00% 6.92%
          

(1)
Average loans include interest and fees on credit cards.

(2)
The ratios of net credit losses are calculated based on average loans, net of unearned income.

(3)
See page 3 and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a cardmember's bankruptcy filing to 30 days after receiptdiscussion of notification. The change was made to improve the accuracy in bankruptcy loss recognition and to closer align Citigroup's practices with industry norms. The effectimpact of this change was not material.SFAS 166/167.

Table of Contents


Consumer Loan Modification Programs

        The CompanyCitigroup has instituted a variety of modification programs to assist borrowers with financial difficulties. These programs, as described below, include modifying the original loan terms, reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. The Company'sAt June 30, 2010, Citi's significant modification programs consistconsisted of the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), as well as short-term forbearance and long-term modification programs, each as summarized below. The short and long-term programs are available to credit card, residential mortgage, personal installment, and auto borrowers both internationally and in the U.S.

        HAMP.    As of September 30, 2009, $5.7 billion of first mortgages, have been enrolled in HAMP, pending successful completion of a trial period (described below).    The HAMP is designed to reduce monthly first mortgage payments to a 31% housing debt ratio (monthly mortgage payment, including property taxes, insurance and homeowner dues, divided by monthly gross income) by lowering the interest rate, extending the term of the loan and forbearingdeferring or forgiving principal of certain eligible borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgages or who are at risk of imminent default due to economic hardship. The interest rate reduction for first mortgages under HAMP is in effect for five years and the rate then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate cap (the lower of the original rate or the Freddie Mac Weekly Primary Mortgage Market Survey rate for a 30-year fixed rate conforming loan as of the date of the modification) is reached.

In order to be entitled to loan modifications, borrowers must complete a three- toto- five-month trial period, make the agreed payments and provide the required documentation. Beginning March 1, 2010, documentation is required to be provided prior to beginning the trial period, whereas prior to that date, it was required to be provided before the end of the trial period. This change generally means that Citi is able to verify income up front for potential HAMP participants before they begin making lower monthly payments. Citi currently believes this change will limit the number of borrowers who ultimately fall out of the trials and potentially mitigates the impact of HAMP trial participants on early bucket delinquency data.

During the trial period, Citi requires that the original terms of the loans remain in effect pending finalcompletion of the modification.

        Short-Term Programs.    Citigroup has also instituted programs to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships. These programs include short-term (twelve months or less) interest rate reductions and deferrals From inception through June 30, 2010, approximately $8.5 billion of past due payments. The loan volume under these short-term programs has increased significantly during 2009. As of September 30, 2009, short-term interest rate reduction programs covered loansfirst mortgages were enrolled in the residential mortgage ($7.4 billion), personal installment ($0.9 billion), credit card ($0.9 billion)HAMP trial period, while $2.5 billion have successfully completed the trial period. Upon completion of the trial period, the terms of the loan are contractually modified, and auto ($0.5 billion) businesses. Payment deferrals primarily occurit is accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring (see "Long-term programs" below).

        Citi also recently agreed to participate in the U.S. residentialTreasury's HAMP second mortgage business. Appropriateprogram, which requires Citi to either: (1) modify the borrower's second mortgage according to a defined protocol; or (2) accept a lump sum payment from the U.S. Treasury in exchange for full extinguishment of the second mortgage. For a borrower to qualify, the borrower must have successfully modified his/her first mortgage under the HAMP and met other criteria.

        Loans included in the HAMP trial period are not classified as modified under short-term or long-term programs, and the allowance for loan loss reserves have been established, giving considerationlosses for these loans is calculated under ASC 450-20. See "Loan Accounting Policies" above for a further discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.

        As of June 30, 2010, of the loans in which the trial period has ended, 37% of the loan balances were successfully modified under HAMP, 12% were modified under the Citi Supplemental program, 6% received HAMP Re-age, (as described under Consumer Loan Modification Programs) and 45% did not receive any modification from Citi to the higher risk associated with those borrowers.date.

        Long-Term Programs.Long-term programs.    Long-term modification programs or "Troubled Debt Restructurings"troubled debt restructurings (TDRs), occur when the terms of a loan have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and a long-term concession has been granted to the borrower. Substantially all long-term programs in place provide interest rate reductions. See "Loan Accounting Policies" above for a discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.

        The following table presents Citigroup's consumer loan TDRs totaled $13.6 billion as of SeptemberJune 30, 2009.2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. As discussed above under "HAMP", HAMP loans whose terms are contractually modified after successful completion of the trial period are included in the balances below:

 
 Accrual Non-accrual 
In millions of dollars Jun. 30,
2010
 Dec. 31,
2009
 Jun. 30,
2010
 Dec. 31,
2009
 

Mortgage and real estate

 $14,135 $8,654 $1,776 $1,413 

Cards(1)

  4,995  2,303  34  150 

Installment and other

  3,431  3,128  333  250 
          

(1)
2010 balances reflect the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

        The predominant amount of these TDRs are concentrated in the U.S. Citi's significant long-term U.S. modification programs include:


Mortgages

        Citi Supplemental.    The Citi Supplemental (CSM) program was designed by Citi to assist borrowers ineligible for HAMP or who become ineligible through the HAMP trial period process. If the borrower already has less than a 31% housing debt ratio, the modification offered is an interest rate reduction (up to 2.5% with a floor rate of 4%) which is in effect for two years, and the rate then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate is at the pre-modified contractual rate. If the borrower's housing debt ratio is greater than 31%, specific treatment steps for HAMP, including an interest rate reduction, will be followed to achieve a 31% housing debt ratio. The modified interest rate is in effect for two years and then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate is at the pre-modified contractual rate. If income documentation was not supplied previously for HAMP, it is required for CSM. Three or more trial payments are required prior to modification. These payments can be appliedmade during the HAMP and/or CSM trial period.

        HAMP Re-Age.    As previously disclosed, loans in the HAMP trial period are aged according to credit card, residential mortgage, personal installment and auto loans. Valuation allowances for TDRstheir original contractual terms, rather than the modified HAMP terms. This results in the receivable being reported as delinquent even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are determinedmade by comparing estimated cash flowsthe borrower. Upon conclusion of the trial period, loans discounted at the loans' original contractual interest ratesthat do not qualify for a long-term modification are returned to the carrying value of the loans.delinquency status in which they began their trial period. However, that delinquency status would be further deteriorated for each trial payment not made (HAMP Re-age). HAMP Re-age establishes a non-interest-bearing deferral


Table of Contents

based on the difference between the original contractual amounts due and the HAMP trial payments made. Citigroup considers this re-age and deferral process to constitute a concession to a borrower in financial difficulty and therefore records the loans as TDRs upon re-age.

        2nd FDIC.    The 2nd FDIC modification program guidelines were created by the FDIC for delinquent or current borrowers where default is reasonably foreseeable. The program is designed for second mortgages and uses various concessions, including interest rate reductions, non-interest-bearing principal deferral, principal forgiveness, extending maturity dates, and forgiving accrued interest and late fees. These potential concessions are applied in a series of steps (similar to HAMP) that provides an affordable payment to the borrower (generally a combined housing payment ratio of 42%). The first step generally reduces the borrower's interest rate to 2% for fixed-rate home equity loans and 0.5% for home equity lines of credit. The interest rate reduction is in effect for the remaining term of the loan.

        FHA/VA.    Loans guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) are modified through the normal modification process required by those respective agencies. Borrowers must be delinquent and concessions include interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness, extending maturity dates, and forgiving accrued interest and late fees. The interest rate reduction is in effect for the remaining loan term. Losses on FHA loans are borne by the sponsoring agency provided that the insurance has not been breached as a result of an origination defect. The VA establishes a loan-level loss cap, beyond which Citi is liable for loss. Historically, Citi's losses on FHA and VA loans have been negligible.

        CFNA Adjustment of Terms (AOT).    This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a permanent hardship. Payment reduction is provided through the re-amortization of the remaining loan balance, typically at a lower interest rate Modified loan tenors may not exceed a period of 480 months. Generally, the rescheduled payment cannot be less than 50% of the original payment amount unless the AOT is a result of participation in the CitiFinancial Home Affordability Modification Program (CHAMP) or military service member's Credit Relief Act Program (SCRA), or as a result of settlement, court order, judgment, or bankruptcy. Customers must make a qualifying payment at the reduced payment amount in order to qualify for the modification. In addition, customers must provide income verification (pay stubs and/or tax returns) and monthly obligations are validated through an updated credit report.

        Other.    Prior to the implementation of the HAMP, CSM and 2nd FDIC programs, Citigroup's U.S. mortgage business offered certain borrowers various tailored modifications, which included reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. Citigroup currently believes that substantially all of its future long-term U.S. mortgage modifications, at least in the near term, will be included in the programs mentioned above.


North America Cards

        Paydown.    The Paydown program is designed to liquidate a customer's balance within 60 months. It is available to customers who indicate long-term hardship (e.g., long-term disability, death of a co-borrower, medical issues or a non-temporary income reduction, such as an occupation change). Payment requirements are decreased by reducing interest rates charged to either 9.9% or 0%, depending upon the customer situation, and designed to amortize at least 1% of the balance each month. Under this program, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.

        CCG.    The CCG program handles proposals received via external consumer credit counselors on the customer's behalf. In order to qualify, customers work with a credit counseling agency to develop a plan to handle their overall budget, including money owed to Citi. A copy of the counseling agency's proposal letter is required. The annual percentage rate (APR) is reduced to 9.9%. The account fully amortizes in 60 months. Under this program, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.

        Interest Reversal Paydown.    The Interest Reversal Paydown program is also designed to liquidate a customer's balance within 60 months. It is available to customers who indicate a long-term hardship.Accumulated interest and fees owed to Citi are reversed upon enrollment, and future interest and fees are discontinued. Payment requirements are reduced and are designed to amortize at least 1% of the balance each month. Under this program, like the programs discussed above, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.


U.S. Installment Loans

        Auto Hardship Amendment.    This program is targeted to customers with a permanent hardship. Examples of permanent hardships include disability subsequent to loan origination, divorce where the party remaining with the vehicle does not have the necessary income to service the debt, or death of a co-borrower. In order to qualify for this program, a customer must complete an "Income and Expense Analysis" and provide proof of income. This analysis is used to determine ability to pay and to establish realistic loan terms (which generally consist of a reduction in interest rates, but could also include principal forgiveness). The borrower must make a payment within 30 days prior to the amendment.

        CFNA Adjustment of Terms (AOT).    This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a permanent hardship. Payment reduction is provided through the re-amortization of the remaining loan balance, typically at a lower interest rate. Loan payments may be rescheduled over a period not to exceed 120 months. Generally, the rescheduled payment cannot be less than 50% of the original payment amount, unless the AOT is a result of a military service member's SCRA, or as a result of settlement, court order, judgment or bankruptcy. The interest rate cannot be reduced below 9% (except in the instances listed above). Customers must make a qualifying payment at the reduced payment amount in order to qualify for the modification. In addition, customers must provide proof of income and monthly obligations are validated through an updated credit report.


Table of Contents

        For general information on Citi's U.S. installment loan portfolio, see "U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans" below.

        The following table sets forth, as of June 30, 2010, information relating to Citi's significant long-term U.S. modification programs:

In millions of dollars Program
balance
 Program
start date(1)
 Average
interest rate
reduction
 Average %
payment relief
 Average
tenor of
modified loans
 Deferred
principal
 Principal
forgiveness
 

U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending

                     
 

HAMP

 $2,331  3Q09  4% 41%32 years $289 $2 
 

Citi Supplemental

  835  4Q09  3  24 28 years  46  1 
 

HAMP Re-age

  439  1Q10  N/A  N/A 25 years  7   
 

2nd FDIC

  355  2Q09  7  48 25 years  21  6 
 

FHA/VA

  3,604     2  16 28 years     
 

Adjustment of Terms (AOTs)

  3,700     3  23 29 years       
 

Other

  3,782     4  42 28 years  33  47 

North America Cards

                     
 

Paydown

  2,218     14   60 months       
 

CCG

  1,756     10   60 months       
 

Interest Reversal Paydown

  213     18   60 months       

U.S. Installment

                     
 

Auto Hardship Amendment

  723     9  28 51 months     6 
 

AOTs

  1,062     8  34 106 months       
                

(1)
Provided if program was introduced within the last 18 months.

        Short-term programs.    Citigroup has also instituted short-term programs (primarily in the U.S.) to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships. These programs include short-term (12 months or less) interest rate reductions and deferrals of past due payments. The loan volume under these short-term programs has increased significantly over the past 18 months , and loan loss reserves for these loans have been enhanced, giving consideration to the higher risk associated with those borrowers and reflecting the estimated future credit losses for those loans. See "Loan Accounting Policies" above for a further discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.

        The following table presents the amounts of gross loans modified under short-term interest rate reduction programs in the U.S. as of June 30, 2010:

 
 June 30, 2010 
In millions of dollars Accrual Non-accrual 

Cards

 $3,732    

Mortgage and real estate

  1,812 $50 

Installment and other

  1,364  80 
      

        Significant short-term U.S. programs include:


North America Cards

        Universal Payment Program (UPP).    The North America cards business provides short-term interest rate reductions to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships through the UPP. Under this program, a participant's APR is reduced by at least 500 basis points for a period of up to 12 months. The minimum payment is tailored to the customer's needs and is designed to amortize at least 1% of the principal balance each month. The participant's APR returns to its original rate at the end of the term or earlier if they fail to make the required payments.


U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending

        Temporary AOT.    This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a temporary hardship. Examples of temporary hardships would include a short-term medical disability or a temporary reduction of pay. Under this program, the interest rate is reduced for either a five- or an eleven-month period. At the end of the temporary modification period, the interest rate reverts to the pre-modification amount. If the customer is still undergoing hardship at the conclusion of the temporary payment reduction, a second extension of the temporary terms can be considered in either of the time period increments above. In cases where the account is severely past due (over 60 days past due) at the expiration of the temporary modification period, the terms of the modification are made permanent and the payment is kept at the reduced amount for the remaining life of the loan.


U.S Installment and Other Revolving Loans

        Temporary AOT.    This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a temporary hardship. Under this program, the interest rate is reduced for either a five- or an eleven-month period. At the end of the temporary modification period, the interest rate reverts to the pre-modification amount. If the customer is still undergoing hardship at the conclusion


Table of Contents

of the temporary payment reduction, a second extension of the temporary terms can be considered in either of the time period increments above. In cases where the account is severely past due (over 90 days past due) at the expiration of the temporary modification period, the terms of the modification are made permanent and the payment is kept at the reduced amount for the remaining life of the loan.

        The following table set forth, as of June 30, 2010, information related to Citi's significant short-term U.S. modification programs:

In millions of dollars Program
balance
 Program
start date(1)
 Average
interest rate
reduction
 Average
time period
for
reduction

UPP

 $3,732     19%12 months

U.S. Consumer Mortgage Temporary AOT

  1,852  1Q09  3%8 months

U.S. Installment Temporary AOT

  1,444  1Q09  5%7 months
         

(1)
Provided if program was introduced within the last 18 months.

        Payment deferrals that do not continue to accrue interest (extensions) primarily occur in the U.S. residential mortgage business. Under an extension, payments that are contractually due are deferred to a later date, thereby extending the maturity date by the number of months of payments being deferred. Extensions assist delinquent borrowers who have experienced short-term financial difficulties that have been resolved by the time the extension is granted. An extension can only be offered to borrowers who are past due on their monthly payments but have since demonstrated the ability and willingness to pay as agreed. Other payment deferrals continue to accrue interest and are not deemed to offer concessions to the customer. Other types of concessions are not material.

        Please see "U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending," "North America Cards," and "U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans" below for a discussion of the impact, to date, of Citi's significant U.S. loan modification programs described above on the respective loan portfolios.


Table of Contents

U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending

Overview

        The Company's U.S.        Citi's North America consumer mortgage portfolio consists of both first lien and second lien mortgages, managed primarily by Local Consumer Lending (LCL) within Citi Holdings. However, $0.5 billion of first lien mortgages and $1.7 billion of second lien mortgages are reported in Citicorp.mortgages. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2009,2010, the U.S. first lien mortgage portfolio totaled approximately $122$109 billion while the U.S. second lien mortgage portfolio was approximately $53 billion.

        Data appearing throughout this report, including in Although the tables below, have been sourced frommajority of the Company's risk systems and, as such, may not reconcile with Citi's disclosures elsewhere generally due to differences in methodology and/or inconsistencies or variations in the manner in which information is captured. In addition, while the Company's risk management function continually reviews and refines its data capture and processing systems, certain Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and loan-to-value (LTV) data on the Company's mortgage portfolio is not available. The Company has noted such variations or inabilities to capture data, as applicable, below where material.

        It is generally the Company's credit risk policy not to offer option ARMs/negative amortizing mortgage products to its customers. Option ARMs/negative amortizing mortgages represent a very insignificant portion of total balances that were acquired only incidentally as part of prior portfolio and business purchases.

        A portion of loansreported in the Company's U.S. mortgage portfolio currently requires a payment to satisfy only the current accrued interest for the payment period or an interest-only payment. The Company's mortgage portfolio includes approximately $30 billion of first and second lien home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) with the interest-only payment feature that are still within their revolving period and have not commenced amortization. The interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for the HELOC product across the industry. The first mortgage portfolio also contains approximately $35 billion of mostly adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) that are currently required to make an interest-only payment. These loans will be required to make a fully amortizing payment upon expiration of their interest-only payment period, and most will do so within a few years of origination. Borrowers that are currently required to make an interest only payment cannot select a lower payment that will negatively amortize the loan. First mortgage loans with the interest-only payment feature are primarily to high credit quality borrowers that have on average significantly higher refreshed FICO scores than other loans in the first mortgage portfolio.

Loan Balances

        First Mortgages—Loan Balances.LCL Approximately 83% of the Company's first lien mortgage portfolio had FICO credit scores of at least 620 at origination. As a consequence of the difficult economic environment and the decrease in housing prices, LTV ratios and FICO scores have deteriorated since originations, as depicted in the tables below. On a refreshed basis, approximately 31%within Citi Holdings, there are $18 billion of first lien mortgages had a FICO score below 620, compared to approximately 17% at origination.and $5 billion of second lien mortgages reported in Citicorp.

Balances: September 30, 2009—First Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

  57% 5% 6%

80% < LTV < 90%

  3% 2% 4%

LTV³ 90%

  10% 6% 7%


Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO£620 

LTV£ 80%

  29% 4% 11%

80% < LTV < 90%

  8% 1% 4%

LTV³ 90%

  23% 4% 16%

Note: First lien mortgage table excludes loans in Canada, Puerto Rico and loans sold with recourse. Balances exclude deferred fees/costs. Refreshed FICO scores based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Case-Shiller Home Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index. Tables exclude $3.1 billion from At Origination balances and $2.6 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. The 90 or more days past due (90+DPD) delinquency rate for mortgages with unavailable FICO or LTV is 13.9% At Origination and 10.2% from Refreshed vs. 10.2% for total portfolio. Excluding government-insured loans, loans subject to long-term standby commitments and PMI loans described below, the 90+DPD delinquency rate for the first lien mortgage portfolio as of September 30, 2009 is 9.0%.

        The Company's        Citi's first lien mortgage portfolio includes $4.8$9.6 billion of loans with Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or Veterans Administration (VA) guarantees. These portfolios consist of loans originated to low-to-moderate-income borrowers with lower FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) scores and generally have higher LTVs. Theseloan-to-value ratios (LTVs). Losses on FHA loans are borne by the sponsoring agency, provided that the insurance has not been breached as a result of an origination defect. The VA establishes a loan-level loss cap, beyond which Citi is liable for loss. FHA and VA loans have high delinquency rates (approximately 37% 90+DPD) but, given the guarantees, the CompanyCiti has experienced negligible credit losses on these loans. The first lien mortgage portfolio also includes $2.4$1.8 billion of loans with LTVs above 80%, which have insurance through private mortgage insurance (PMI) companies, and $4.2$2.0 billion of loans subject to Long-Term Standby Commitments(1)long-term standby commitments(1) (LTSC), with Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE)U.S. government sponsored entities (GSEs), for which the CompanyCiti has limited exposure to credit losses. Citi's second lien mortgage portfolio also includes $1.5 billion of loans subject to LTSCs with GSEs, for which Citi has limited exposure to credit losses. Citi's allowance for loan loss calculations take into consideration the impact of these guarantees.

Impact of Mortgage Modification Programs on Consumer Mortgage Portfolio

        As discussed in "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" above, Citigroup also offers short-term and long-term real estate loan modification programs. The main objective of these programs is generally to reduce the payment burden for the borrower and improve the net present value of cash flows. Citi monitors the performance of its real estate loan modification programs by tracking credit loss rates by vintage. At 18 months after modifying an account, in Citi's experience to date, credit loss rates are typically reduced by approximately one-third compared to accounts that were not modified.

        Citigroup considers a combination of historical re-default rates, the current economic environment, and the nature of the modification program in forecasting expected cash flows in the determination of the allowance for loan losses on TDRs. With respect to HAMP, contractual modifications of loans that successfully completed the HAMP trial period began in the third quarter of 2009; accordingly, this is the earliest HAMP vintage available for comparison. While Citi continues to evaluate the impact of HAMP, Citi's experience to date is that re-default rates are likely to be lower for HAMP-modified loans as compared to Citi Supplemental modifications due to what it believes to be the deeper payment and interest rate reductions associated with HAMP modifications.

Consumer Mortgage Quarterly Trends—Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses

        The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for the Citi's first and second lien North America consumer mortgage portfolios.

        In the first lien mortgage portfolio, as previously disclosed, both delinquencies and net credit losses have continued to be impacted by the HAMP trial loans and the growing backlog of foreclosures in process. As previously disclosed, loans in the HAMP trial modification period that do not make their original contractual payments are reported as delinquent, even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower. Upon conclusion of the trial period, loans that are not modified permanently are returned to the delinquency status in which they began their trial period, adjusted for the number of payments received during the trial period. If the loans are modified permanently, they will be returned to current status.

        In addition, the growing amount of foreclosures in process, which continues to be related to an industry-wide phenomenon resulting from foreclosure moratoria and other efforts to prevent or forestall foreclosure, have specific implications for the portfolio:

As set forth in the charts below, both first and second lien mortgages experienced fewer 90 days or more delinquencies in the second quarter of 2010, which led to lower net credit losses in the quarter as well. For first lien mortgages, the sequential improvement in 90 days or more delinquencies was driven entirely by asset sales and HAMP trials converting into permanent modifications. In the quarter, Citi sold $1.3 billion in delinquent mortgages. As of June 30, 2010, $2.5 billion of HAMP trial modifications in Citi's on-balance sheet portfolio were converted to permanent modifications, up from $1.6 billion at the end of the first quarter of 2010. For second lien mortgages, the net credit loss decrease during the quarter was driven by roll rate improvement.


(1)
A Long-Term Standby Commitment (LTSC)LTSC is a structured transaction in which the CompanyCiti transfers the credit risk of certain eligible loans to an investor in exchange for a fee. These loans remain on balance sheet unless they reach a certain delinquency level (between 120 and 180 days), in which case the LTSC investor is required to buy the loan at par.

Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans 90 days or more past due exclude loans recorded at fair value and U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored agencies because the potential loss predominately resides with the U.S. agencies.

GRAPHIC

Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans 90 days or more past due exclude loans recorded at fair value and U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored agencies because the potential loss predominately resides with the U.S. agencies.


Table of Contents

Consumer Mortgage FICO and LTV

        Data appearing in the tables below have been sourced from Citigroup's risk systems and, as such, may not reconcile with disclosures elsewhere generally due to differences in methodology or variations in the manner in which information is captured. Citi has noted such variations in instances where it believes they could be material to reconcile the information presented elsewhere.

        Citi's credit risk policy is not to offer option adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs)/negative amortizing mortgage products to its customers. As a result, option ARMs/negative amortizing mortgages represent an insignificant portion of total balances since they were acquired only incidentally as part of prior portfolio and business purchases.

        A portion of loans in the U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio currently requires a payment to satisfy only the current accrued interest for the payment period, or an interest-only payment. Citi's mortgage portfolio includes approximately $28 billion of first- and second- lien home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) that are still within their revolving period and have not commenced amortization. The interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for the HELOC product across the industry. The first lien mortgage portfolio contains approximately $30 billion of ARMs that are currently required to make an interest-only payment. These loans will be required to make a fully amortizing payment upon expiration of their interest-only payment period, and most will do so within a few years of origination. Borrowers that are currently required to make an interest-only payment cannot select a lower payment that would negatively amortize the loan. First lien mortgage loans with this payment feature are primarily to high credit quality borrowers that have on average significantly higher refreshed FICO scores than other loans in the first lien mortgage portfolio.

Loan Balances

        SecondFirst Lien Mortgages—Loan Balances.    InAs a consequence of the second lien mortgage portfolio,difficult economic environment and the majority of loans aredecrease in housing prices, LTV and FICO scores have generally deteriorated since origination, as depicted in the higher FICO categories. However,table below. On a refreshed basis, approximately 31% of first lien mortgages had a LTV ratio above 100%, compared to approximately 0% at origination. Approximately 29% of the challenging economic conditions have created a migration towards lowerfirst lien mortgages had FICO scores and higher LTV ratios. Approximately 61% of that portfolio hadless than 620 on a refreshed LTV ratios of 90% or more,basis, compared to about 36%16% at origination. However, many of the loans in the portfolio are HELOC's, where the LTV ratio is calculated as if the line were fully drawn. As a majority of lines are only partially drawn, current LTVs on a drawn basis will be lower.

Balances: SeptemberJune 30, 2009—Second2010—First Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620  FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

 48% 2% 2% 58% 6% 7%

80% < LTV < 90%

 10% 1% 1%

LTV³ 90%

 33% 2% 1%

80% < LTV£ 100%

 13% 7% 9%

LTV > 100%

 NM NM NM 

 

Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620  FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

 22% 2% 3% 26% 4% 9%

80% < LTV < 90%

 9% 1% 2%

LTV³ 90%

 44% 5% 12%

80% < LTV£ 100%

 18% 3% 9%

LTV > 100%

 16% 4% 11%

Note: SecondNM—Not meaningful. First lien mortgage table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico. Table excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs. Table also excludes $1.7 billion from At Origination balances and $0.4 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. Balances exclude deferred fees/costs. Refreshed FICO scores based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Case-Shiller HomeLoan Performance Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index. Tables exclude $1.8

        Second Lien Mortgages—Loan Balances.    In the second lien mortgage portfolio, the majority of loans are in the higher FICO categories. The challenging economic conditions have generally caused a migration towards lower FICO scores and higher LTV ratios. Approximately 47% of second lien mortgages had refreshed LTVs above 100%, compared to approximately 0% at origination. Approximately 18% of second lien mortgages had FICO scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis, compared to 3% at origination.


Table of Contents

Balances: June 30, 2010—Second Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

  49% 2% 2%

80% < LTV£ 100%

  43% 3% 1%

LTV > 100%

  NM  NM  NM 


Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

  22% 1% 3%

80% < LTV£ 100%

  21% 2% 4%

LTV > 100%

  32% 4% 11%
        

Note: N.M.—Not meaningful. Second lien mortgage table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico. Table excludes loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs. Table also excludes $1.6 billion from At Origination balances and $1.6$0.4 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. As of September 30, 2009,Refreshed FICO scores are based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the 90+ DPD delinquency rate for mortgages with unavailable FICOLoan Performance Price Index or LTV is 3.8% At Origination and 7.1% from Refreshed vs. 3.1% for total portfolio.the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index.

        The second lien mortgage portfolio includes $1.8 billion of loans subject to LTSC with one of the GSE, hence limiting the Company's exposure to credit losses.

Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses

        The tables below provide delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD,90 or more days past due (90+DPD), as a percentage of outstandings in each of the FICO/LTV combinations, in both the first lien and second lien mortgage portfolios. For example, loans with FICO³ 660 and LTV£ 80% at origination have a 90+DPD rate of 6.6%5.8%.

        As evidenced by the tables below, loansLoans with FICO scores of less than 620 exhibit significantly higher delinquencies than in any other FICO band. Similarly, loans with LTVs equal to or greater than 90%100% have higher delinquencies than LTVs of less than 90%.

        In addition, the first mortgage delinquencies continuedor equal to rise during the third quarter. Further breakout of the FICO below 620 segment indicates that delinquencies in this segment, on a refreshed basis, are about three times higher than in the overall first mortgage portfolio.100%.

Delinquencies: 90+DPD Rates—First Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620  FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

 6.6% 11.3% 13.5% 5.8% 11.0% 12.1%

80%> < LTV < 90%

 7.9% 14.3% 17.8%

LTV³ 90%

 10.1% 17.6% 24.7%

80% < LTV£ 100%

 8.1% 13.5% 16.8%

LTV > 100%

 NM NM NM 

 

Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620  FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

 0.2% 3.4% 17.8% 0.3% 3.3% 15.0%

80%£ LTV < 90%

 0.5% 5.9% 24.7%

LTV³ 90%

 1.7% 13.7% 36.3%

80% < LTV£ 100%

 0.8% 7.8% 22.6%

LTV > 100%

 2.0% 15.4% 30.3%
       

Note: NM—Not meaningful. 90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the tables above.

Delinquencies: 90+DPD Rates—Second Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620  FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

 1.5% 4.0% 5.1% 1.6% 4.2% 5.1%

80% < LTV < 90%

 3.3% 5.0% 5.8%

LTV³ 90%

 4.7% 5.6% 7.6%

80% < LTV£ 100%

 3.7% 4.9% 7.0%

LTV > 100%

 NM NM NM 

 

Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620  FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

 0.0% 0.9% 8.3% 0.1% 1.2% 8.2%

80% < LTV < 90%

 0.0% 0.7% 8.5%

LTV³ 90%

 0.3% 3.6% 18.1%

80% < LTV£ 100%

 0.1% 1.3% 9.6%

LTV > 100%

 0.4% 3.1% 16.6%

Note: NM—Not meaningful. 90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the tables above.

        The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for the Company's first and second N.A. consumer mortgage portfolios.

        Both losses and delinquencies for the first mortgage portfolio have been impacted by the HAMP. As set forth in the first chart, first mortgage delinquencies continued to increase in the third quarter of 2009, exacerbated in part by the reduction in loan balances. However, the continued increase in first mortgage delinquencies during the third quarter 2009 is largely explained by the impact of HAMP. As mentioned elsewhere in this report, loans in the HAMP trial modification period are reported as delinquent if the original contractual payments are not received on time (even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower).

        Further, HAMP impacted Citi's net credit losses in the first mortgage portfolio during the third quarter of 2009 as


Table of Contents

loans in the trial period are not charged off at 180 DPD as long as they have made at least one payment. Nearly half of the sequential decline in net credit losses on first mortgages during the third quarter 2009 was attributable to HAMP. The Company has increased its loan loss provisions to offset this impact.

        Based on these trends described above, the Company believes that the success rate of HAMP will be a key factor influencing net credit losses from delinquent first mortgage loans in the near future, and the outcome of the program will largely depend on the success rates of borrowers completing the trial period and meeting the documentation requirements.

        By contrast, during the third quarter of 2009, second mortgage delinquencies began to moderate, as did net credit losses, as compared to the prior quarter. The Company continues to actively manage this exposure by reducing the riskiest accounts, including by tightening credit requirements through higher FICOs, lower LTVs, increased documentation and verifications.

        It should be noted that first mortgage net credit losses, as a percentage of average loans, are nearly half the level of those in the second mortgage portfolio, despite much higher delinquencies in the first mortgage portfolio. The Company believes that two major factors explain this relationship:


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

Note: Includes loans for Canada, Puerto Rico and loans held for sale. Balances include deferred fees/costs.

GRAPHIC

Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico.

Origination Channel, Geographic Distribution and Origination Vintage

        The following tables detail the Company'sCiti's first and second lien U.S. Consumerconsumer mortgage portfoliosportfolio by origination channels, geographic distribution and origination vintage.

By Origination Channel

        The Company'sCiti's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio has been originated from three main channels: retail, broker and correspondent.


Table of Contents

First Lien Mortgages: SeptemberJune 30, 20092010

        As of June 30, 2010, approximately 54% of the first lien mortgage portfolio was originated through third-party channels. Given that loans originated through correspondents have exhibited higher 90+DPD delinquency rates than retail originated mortgages, Citi terminated business with a number of correspondent sellers in 2007 and 2008. During 2008, Citi also severed relationships with a number of brokers, only maintaining those who have produced strong, high-quality and profitable volume.

CHANNEL
($ in billions)
 First Lien
Mortgages
 Channel
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90  First Lien
Mortgages
 Channel
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV > 100% 

Retail

 $50.5 41.5% 4.4%$14.6 $16.4  $44.4 46.3% 5.2%$13.6 $9.5 

Broker

 $21.0 17.3% 10.5%$4.2 $10.0  $16.7 17.4% 8.2%$3.1 $5.6 

Correspondent

 $50.2 41.2% 15.9%$18.6 $26.0  $34.8 36.3% 12.3%$11.6 $13.9 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans sold with recourse.subject to LTSCs.


        AsTable of September 30, 2009, approximately 41% of the first lien mortgage portfolio was originated through the correspondent channel, a reduction from approximately 43% as of the end of 2008. Given that loans originated through correspondents have exhibited higher 90+DPD delinquency rates than retail originated mortgages, the Company terminated business with a number of correspondent sellers in 2007 and 2008. During 2008, the Company severed relationships with a number of brokers, only maintaining those who have produced strong, high-quality and profitable volume.Contents

Second Lien Mortgages: SeptemberJune 30, 20092010

CHANNEL
($ in billions)
 Second Lien
Mortgages
 Channel
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90 

Retail

 $27.0  50.8% 1.6%$3.9 $12.4 

Broker

 $13.2  24.9% 4.0%$2.2 $9.9 

Correspondent

 $12.9  24.3% 5.2%$3.1 $9.5 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico.

        For second lien mortgages, approximately 49%48% of the loans were originated through third-party channels. As these mortgages have demonstrated a higher incidence of delinquencies, the CompanyCiti no longer originates second mortgages through third-party channels, which represented approximately 54% of the portfolio as of the end of 2008.channels.

CHANNEL
($ in billions)
 Second Lien
Mortgages
 Channel
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV > 100% 

Retail

 $23.9  52.2% 1.8%$3.8 $7.1 

Broker

 $11.3  24.8% 3.8%$2.0 $6.8 

Correspondent

 $10.5  23.0% 4.1%$2.5 $7.5 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.

By State

        Approximately half of the Company'sCiti's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio is located in five states: California, New York, Florida, TexasIllinois and Illinois. ThoseTexas. These states represent 49%50% of first lien mortgages and 54%55% of second lien mortgages.

        Florida and Illinois have above average 90+DPD delinquency rates. Florida has 39%54% of its first mortgage lien portfolio in the FICO<620 band; and 66%with refreshed LTV>100%, compared to 30% overall for first lien mortgages. Illinois has 45% of its loan portfolio haswith refreshed LTV³90. Illinois has 33% of its loans in the FICO<620 band; and 54% of its loan portfolio has LTV³90.LTV>100%. Texas, despite having 44%41% of its portfolio with FICO<620, has a lower delinquency rate relative to the overall portfolio. Texas has only 8%5% of its loan portfolio with refreshed LTV³90.LTV>100%.

First Lien Mortgages: SeptemberJune 30, 20092010

STATES
($ in billions)
 First Lien
Mortgages
 State
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90  First Lien
Mortgages
 State
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV > 100% 

California

 $32.3 26.6% 9.0%$5.2 $18.3  $26.1 27.2% 7.2%$4.0 $10.0 

New York

 $10.0 8.2% 6.8%$2.0 $1.7  $7.9 8.2% 6.4%$1.5 $0.9 

Florida

 $7.3 6.0% 16.8%$2.8 $4.8  $5.8 6.1% 13.0%$2.1 $3.1 

Illinois

 $4.0 4.2% 9.8%$1.3 $1.8 

Texas

 $5.3 4.3% 8.7%$2.3 $0.4  $3.9 4.1% 5.7%$1.6 $0.2 

Illinois

 $5.2 4.3% 11.4%$1.7 $2.8 

Others

 $61.7 50.7% 10.6%$23.4 $24.3  $48.2 50.2% 8.7%$17.9 $13.1 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans sold with recourse.subject to LTSCs.

        In the second lien mortgage portfolio, Florida continues to experience above-average delinquencies, with approximately 81%71% of their loans with refreshed LTV³ 90 > 100% compared to 60%47% overall for second lien mortgages.

Second Lien Mortgages: SeptemberJune 30, 20092010

STATES
($ in billions)
 Second Lien
Mortgages
 State
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90  Second Lien
Mortgages
 State
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV > 100% 

California

 $14.6 27.4% 3.8%$2.0 $10.4  $12.8 27.9% 3.0%$1.8 $6.4 

New York

 $6.9 12.9% 1.9%$0.8 $2.2  $6.3 13.8% 2.2%$0.9 $1.4 

Florida

 $3.6 6.8% 5.2%$0.8 $2.9  $2.9 6.4% 4.8%$0.7 $2.1 

Illinois

 $2.1 3.9% 3.0%$0.4 $1.5  $1.8 3.9% 2.6%$0.3 $1.1 

Texas

 $1.5 2.8% 1.2%$0.2 $0.2  $1.3 2.8% 1.3%$0.2 $0.4 

Others

 $24.5 46.1% 2.8%$5.0 $14.5  $20.7 45.2% 2.7%$4.4 $9.9 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico.Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.


Table of Contents

By Vintage

        For the Company'sCitigroup's combined U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio (first and second lien mortgages), approximately half of the portfolio consists of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which demonstrate above average delinquencies. In first mortgages, approximately 43% of the portfolio is of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which have 90+DPD rates well above the overall portfolio rate. In second mortgages, 64%62% of the portfolio is of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which again have higher delinquencies compared to the overall portfolio rate.

First Lien Mortgages: SeptemberJune 30, 20092010

VINTAGES
($ in billions)
 First Lien
Mortgages
 Vintage
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90  First Lien
Mortgages
 Vintage
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV > 100% 

2010

 $0.7 0.7% 0.0%$0.1 $0.1 

2009

 $4.1 3.3% 0.3%$0.6 $0.9  $3.8 4.0% 0.7%$0.5 $0.2 

2008

 $15.1 12.4% 5.2%$3.3 $5.5  $12.3 12.9% 4.9%$2.8 $2.5 

2007

 $30.0 24.6% 15.8%$11.5 $18.7  $23.9 25.0% 12.2%$8.7 $11.6 

2006

 $22.2 18.2% 13.7%$7.6 $13.3  $17.1 17.8% 10.7%$5.4 $8.1 

2005

 $20.8 17.1% 7.5%$5.0 $9.6  $16.5 17.2% 6.6%$3.9 $5.1 

£ 2004

 $29.5 24.3% 7.7%$9.5 $4.5  $21.6 22.5% 6.9%$6.8 $1.5 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans sold with recourse.subject to LTSCs.


Table of Contents

Second Lien Mortgages: SeptemberJune 30, 20092010

VINTAGES
($ in billions)
 Second Lien
Mortgages
 Vintage
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90  Second Lien
Mortgages
 Vintage
% Total
 90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV > 100% 

2010

 $0.1 0.3% 0.0%$0.0 $0.0 

2009

 $0.5 0.9% 0.6%$0.0 $0.0  $0.6 1.3% 0.2%$0.0 $0.0 

2008

 $4.4 8.3% 0.9%$0.5 $1.5  $4.0 8.8% 1.1%$0.6 $0.7 

2007

 $16.0 30.0% 3.5%$3.0 $10.4  $13.4 29.4% 3.2%$2.7 $7.2 

2006

 $17.8 33.6% 3.8%$3.4 $12.9  $14.7 32.2% 3.4%$2.9 $8.9 

2005

 $10.1 18.9% 2.7%$1.5 $6.2  $8.8 19.2% 2.6%$1.4 $4.0 

£ 2004

 $4.4 8.3% 1.7%$0.7 $0.9  $4.0 8.7% 1.7%$0.6 $0.5 

*
Refreshed FICO and LTV.

Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico.Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.


N.A.North America Cards

        The Company's N.A.Overview

        Citi's North America cards portfolio consists of our Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios located in Citicorp—Regional Consumer Banking and Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, the Citi-branded portfolio totaled approximately $77 billion, while the retail partner cards portfolio was approximately $50 billion.

Impact of Loss Mitigation and Cards Modification Programs on Cards Portfolios

        In each of its Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios, locatedCiti continues to actively eliminate riskier accounts to mitigate losses. Higher risk customers have either had their available lines of credit reduced or their accounts closed. On a net basis, end of period open accounts are down 15% in CiticorpCiti-branded cards and Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending, respectively. As of September 30, 2009, the U.S. Citi-branded portfolio totaled approximately $84 billion while the U.S.down 13% in retail partner cards portfolio was approximately $57 billion, both reported on a managed basis.versus prior-year levels.

        In the Company'sAs previously disclosed, in Citi's experience to date, these portfolios have significantly different characteristics:

        As a result, loss mitigation efforts, such as stricter underwriting standards for new accounts, decreasing higher risk credit lines, closing high risk accounts and re-pricing, have tended to affect the retail partner cards portfolio faster than the branded portfolio.

        In addition to tightening credit standards, Citi also offers short-term and long-term cards modification programs, as discussed under "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" above. Citigroup monitors the performance of these U.S. credit card short-term and long-term modification programs by tracking cumulative loss rates by vintages (when customers enter a program) and comparing that performance with that of similar accounts whose terms were not modified. For example, as previously reported, for U.S. credit cards, in Citi's experience to date, at 24 months after modifying an account, Citi typically reduces credit losses by approximately one-third compared to similar accounts that were not modified. This improved performance of modified loans relative to those not modified has generally been the greatest during the first 12 months after modification. Following that period, losses have tended to increase, but have typically stabilized at levels which are still below those for similar loans that were not modified, resulting in an improved cumulative loss performance. In addition, during the second quarter of 2010, Citi placed fewer accounts into these programs and the results for these programs have remained positive.

        Overall, however, Citi continues to believe that net credit losses in each of its cards portfolios will likely continue to remain at elevated levels and will continue to be highly dependent on macroeconomic conditions and industry changes, including continued implementation of the CARD Act.

Cards Quarterly Trends—Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses

        The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for Citigroup'sNorth America Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios.

        During the second quarter of 2010, Citi continued to see stable to improving trends across both portfolios, based in part, it believes, on its loss mitigation programs, as previously discussed. Across both portfolios, delinquencies declined during the second quarter of 2010. In Citi-branded cards, net credit losses declined sequentially. On a percentage basis, however, net credit losses were up in Citi-branded cards due to declining loan balances. In retail partner cards, net credit losses declined for the fourth consecutive quarter.


Table of Contents

GRAPHIC


Note: Includes Puerto Rico.

GRAPHIC


Note: Includes Canada and Puerto Rico. Includes Installment Lending.


Table of Contents

North America Cards—FICO Information

        As set forth in the table below, on a refreshed basis approximately 73% of the Citi-branded portfolio had FICO credit scores of at least 660 on a refreshed basis as of SeptemberJune 30, 2009,2010, while 62%65% of the retail partner cards portfolio had scores of at leastabove 660.

Balances: SeptemberJune 30, 20092010

Refreshed Citi Branded Retail Partners 

FICO³ 660

  73% 62%

620£FICO<660

  11% 13%

FICO<620

  16% 25%
Refreshed
 Citi Branded Retail Partners 

FICO ³ 660

  73% 65%

620 £ FICO < 660

  11% 13%

FICO < 620

  16% 22%

Note: Based on balances of $138$120 billion. Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico and Installment and Classified portfolios. Excludes balances where FICO was unavailable ($0.92.4 billion for Citi-branded, $2.2$2.1 billion for retail partner cards). 90+DPD delinquency rate for balances where FICO was unavailable is 9.83% for Citi-branded and 9.38% for retail partner cards vs. overall rate of 2.63% for Citi-branded and 4.49% for retail partner cards.

        In each of the two portfolios, Citi has been actively eliminating riskier accounts and sales to mitigate losses. First, the Company has removed high risk customers from the portfolio by either reducing available lines of credit or closing accounts. End-of-period open accounts are down 16% in branded cards and 13% in retail partner cards versus prior year levels. Second, the Company has improved the tools used to identify and manage exposure in each of the portfolios by targeting unique customer attributes. Loss mitigation programs that entail a reduction in customers' monthly payments obligation constitutes less than 5% of the overall managed portfolio as of September 30, 2009. These programs along with other loss mitigation activities have stabilized reported delinquencies and net credit losses and importantly, early indicators of re-default rates related to these programs are within expected norms.


Table of Contents

        The table below provides delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD for both the Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios as of SeptemberJune 30, 2009.2010. Given the economic environment, customers have generally migrated down from higher FICO score ranges, driven by their delinquencies with Citi and/or with other creditors. As these customers roll through the delinquency buckets, they materially damage their credit score and may ultimately go to charge-off. Loans with FICO scores less than 620, which constitute 16% of the Citi-branded portfolio, have a 90+DPD rate of 15.2%; in the retail partner cards portfolio, loans with FICO scores less than 620 constitute 25% of the portfolio and have a 90+DPD rate of 16.8%.

90+DPD Delinquency Rate: September 30, 2009

Refreshed Citi Branded
90+DPD%
 Retail Partners
90+DPD%
 

FICO³ 660

  0.1% 0.2%

620£FICO<660

  0.3% 0.6%

FICO<620

  15.2% 16.8%

Note: Based on balances of $138 billion. Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico, Installment and Classified portfolios. Loans 90 days or more past due are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquency has been reported by the CompanyCitigroup to the credit bureaus.

        The following charts detail Loans with FICO scores less than 620, which constitute 16% of the quarterly trendsCiti-branded portfolio, have a 90+DPD rate of 16.3%; in delinquencies and net credit losses for the Company's N.A. Citi-branded and retail partner cards portfolios.

        The Company believes that net credit losses in each of the cards portfolios will continue to remain at elevated levels and will continue to be highly dependent on the external environment and industry changes.


16.7%.

Table of Contents90+DPD Delinquency Rate: June 30, 2010

GRAPHIC

Refreshed
 Citi Branded
90+DPD%
 Retail Partners
90+DPD%
 

FICO ³ 660

  0.2% 0.2%

620 £ FICO < 660

  0.7% 0.8%

FICO < 620

  16.3% 16.7%

Note: IncludesBased on balances of $120 billion. Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico.Rico and Installment and Classified portfolios.

GRAPHIC


Note: Includes Canada and Puerto Rico.

The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009

        On May 22, 2009, The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act) was enacted into law. The CARD Act will affect various credit card practices of card issuers, including Citigroup, such as marketing, underwriting, pricing, billing and disclosure requirements, thus reshaping the way consumers have access to and use their credit cards. Currently, many of the provisions in the CARD Act are to take effect in February 2010, although some provisions were effective in August 2009 and some will take effect in August 2010. However, legislation has been introduced in Congress to accelerate certain provisions of the CARD Act.

        Certain provisions of the CARD Act are consistent with Citigroup's existing practices and will not require any changes or modifications. Other provisions, however, such as those that restrict the ability of an issuer to increase APRs on outstanding balances or that establish standards for penalty fees and payment allocation, will require Citigroup to make fundamental changes to its credit card business model. The impact of the CARD Act on Citigroup's credit businesses is not fully known at this time. The final impact will ultimately depend upon the successful implementation of changes to Citigroup's business model and the continued regulatory actions on and interpretations of the CARD Act, among other considerations.


Table of Contents


U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans

        In the table below, the Company's U.S. Installmentinstallment portfolio consists of consumer loans in the following businesses: Consumer Finance, Retail Banking, Auto, Student Lending and Cards. Other Revolving consists of consumer loans (Ready Credit and Checking Plus products) in the Consumer Retail Banking business. Commercial-related loans are not included.

        As of SeptemberJune 30, 2009,2010, the U.S. Installment portfolio totaled approximately $58$64 billion, while the U.S. Other Revolving portfolio was approximately $1$0.9 billion. While substantially all of the U.S. Installment portfolio is managed under reported inLCL within Citi Holdings, it does include $0.4 billion of Consumer Retail Banking loans which are reported in Citicorp. The U.S. Other Revolving portfolio is managed under Citicorp. TheAs of June 30, 2010, the U.S. Installment portfolio includes $21included approximately $33 billion of student loansStudent Loans originated under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) where losses are substantially mitigated by federal guarantees if the loans are properly serviced. In addition, there were approximately $6 billion of non-FFELP Student Loans where losses are mitigated by private insurance. These insurance providers insure Citi against a significant portion of losses arising from borrower loan default, bankruptcy or death.

        Approximately 44%37% of the Installment portfolio had FICO credit scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis. The Company continues to execute its strategy to wind down the assets in Citi Holdings. Approximately 29%26% of the Other Revolving portfolio is composed of loans having FICO less than 620.

Balances: SeptemberJune 30, 20092010

Refreshed
 Installment Other Revolving 

FICO³ 660

  41% 56%

620£FICO<660

  15% 15%

FICO<620

  44% 29%
Refreshed
 Installment Other Revolving 

FICO ³ 660

  50% 59%

620 £ FICO < 660

  13% 15%

FICO < 620

  37% 26%

Note: Based on balances of $56$62 billion for Installment and $0.9$0.8 billion for Other Revolving. Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico. Excludes balances where FICO was unavailable ($2.31.6 billion for Installment, $0.1 billion for Other Revolving). 90+ DPD delinquency rate for balances where FICO was unavailable is 3.55% for Installment and 6.34% for Other Revolving vs. overall rate of 2.84% for Installment and 3.12% for Other Revolving.

        The table below provides delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD for both the Installment and Other Revolving portfolios. Loans 90+DPD are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquency has been reported by Citigroup to the credit bureaus. On a refreshed basis, loans with FICO scores of less than 620 exhibit significantly higher delinquencies than in any other FICO band and will drive the majority of the losses.

90+DPD Delinquency Rate: SeptemberJune 30, 20092010

Refreshed
 Installment
90+DPD%
 Other Revolving
90+DPD%
 

FICO³ 660

  0.1% 0.0%

620£FICO<660

  0.3% 0.4%

FICO<620

  6.2% 9.2%
Refreshed
 Installment
90+DPD%
 Other Revolving
90+DPD%
 

FICO ³ 660

  0.2% 0.4%

620 £ FICO < 660

  1.3% 1.3%

FICO < 620

  7.7% 6.6%

Note: Based on balances of $56$62 billion for Installment and $0.9$0.8 billion for Other Revolving. Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans 90


Table of Contents

Interest Rate Risk Associated with Consumer Mortgage Lending Activity

        Citigroup originates and funds mortgage loans. As with all other lending activity, this exposes Citigroup to several risks, including credit, liquidity and interest rate risks. To manage credit and liquidity risk, Citigroup sells most of the mortgage loans it originates, but retains the servicing rights. These sale transactions create an intangible asset referred to as mortgage servicing rights (MSRs). The fair value of this asset is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. The fair value of MSRs declines with increased prepayments, and lower interest rates are generally one factor that tends to lead to increased prepayments. Thus, by retaining risks of sold mortgage loans, Citigroup is exposed to interest rate risk.

        In managing this risk, Citigroup hedges a significant portion of the value of its MSRs through the use of interest rate derivative contracts, forward purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and purchased securities classified as trading (primarily mortgage-backed securities including principal-only strips).

        Since the change in the value of these hedging instruments does not perfectly match the change in the value of the MSRs, Citigroup is still exposed to what is commonly referred to as "basis risk." Citigroup manages this risk by reviewing the mix of the various hedging instruments referred to above on a daily basis.

        Citigroup's MSRs totaled $4.894 billion and $6.530 billion at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. For additional information on Citi's MSRs, see Notes 11 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        As part of the mortgage lending activity, Citigroup commonly enters into purchase commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at specific interest rates within a given period of time, generally up to 60 days or more past due are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquencyafter the rate has been reportedset. If the resulting loans from these commitments will be classified as loans held-for-sale, Citigroup accounts for the commitments as derivatives. Accordingly, the initial and subsequent changes in the fair value of these commitments, which are driven by changes in mortgage interest rates, are recognized in current earnings after taking into consideration the Companylikelihood that the commitment will be funded.

        Citigroup hedges its exposure to the credit bureaus.change in the value of these commitments by utilizing hedging instruments similar to those referred to above.


Table of Contents


Corporate Loan DetailsCORPORATE CREDIT PORTFOLIO

        For corporate clients and investment banking activities across Citigroup, the credit process is grounded in a series of fundamental policies, including:

Corporate Credit Portfolio

        The following table presents credit data for the Company'sCitigroup's corporate loans and unfunded lending commitments at SeptemberJune 30, 2009:2010. The ratings scale is based on Citi's internal risk ratings, which generally correspond to the ratings as defined by S&P and Moody's.



 At September 30, 2009 
 At June 30, 2010 
Corporate Loans(1)(in millions of dollars) Recorded Investment
in Loans(2)
 % of Total(3) Unfunded
Lending Commitments
 % of Total(3) 
Corporate loans(1)
in millions of dollars
Corporate loans(1)
in millions of dollars
 Recorded investment
in loans(2)
 % of total(3) Unfunded
lending commitments
 % of total(3) 

Investment grade(4)

Investment grade(4)

 $96,689 57%$275,556 88%

Investment grade(4)

 $118,470 69%$231,863 87%

Non-investment grade(4)

Non-investment grade(4)

 

Non-investment grade(4)

 

Noncriticized

 21,010 12 14,268 5 

Noncriticized

 21,312 12 16,911 6 

Criticized performing(5)

 36,803 22 20,384 6 

Criticized performing(5)

 21,065 12 14,108 6 
 

Commercial real estate (CRE)

 6,170 4 1,786 0  

Commercial real estate (CRE)

 5,623 3 1,781 1 
 

Commercial & Industrial

 30,633 18 18,598 6  

Commercial and Industrial and Other

 15,442 9 12,327 5 

Criticized non-performing(5)

 14,776 9 3,246 1 

Non-accrual (criticized)(5)

 11,036 6 3,043 1 
 

Commercial real estate (CRE)

 3,783 3 913 0  

CRE

 2,568 1 988  
 

Commercial & Industrial

 10,993 6 2,333 1  

Commercial and Industrial and Other

 8,468 5 2,055 1 
                   

Total non-investment grade

Total non-investment grade

 $72,589 43%$37,898 12%

Total non-investment grade

 $53,413 31%$34,062 13%

Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis(6)(4)

Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis(6)(4)

 14,565   2,275   

Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis(6)(4)

 13,738   2,216   

Loans at fair value

Loans at fair value

 1,475      

Loans at fair value

 2,358      
                   

Total Corporate Loans

 $185,318   $315,754   

Total corporate loans

Total corporate loans

 $187,979   $268,141   

Unearned income

Unearned income

 (4,598)      

Unearned income

 (1,259)      
                   

Corporate Loans, net of unearned income

 $180,720   $315,754   

Corporate loans, net of unearned income

Corporate loans, net of unearned income

 $186,720   $268,141   
                   

(1)
Includes $575$765 million of TDRs for which concessions, such as the reduction of interest rates or the deferral of interest or principal payments, have been granted as a result of deterioration in the borrowers' financial condition. Each of the borrowers is current under the restructured terms.

(2)
Recorded investment in a loan includes accrued interest, net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount, less any direct write-downs.

(3)
Percentages disclosed above exclude Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis and loans at fair value.

(4)
Held-for-investment loans accounted for on an amortized cost basis.

(5)
Criticized exposures correspondscorrespond to the Special"Special Mention, Substandard" "Substandard" and Doubtful"Doubtful" asset categories defined by banking regulatory authorities.

(6)
Approximately $0.2 billion are 90+DPD.

Table of Contents

        The following tables represent the corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking), before consideration of collateral, by maturity at SeptemberJune 30, 2009.2010. The corporate portfolio is broken out by direct outstandings whichthat include drawn loans, overdrafts, interbank placements, bankers' acceptances, certain investment securities and leases and unfunded commitments whichthat include unused commitments to lend, letters of credit and financial guarantees.


 At September 30, 2009  At June 30, 2010 
In billions of dollars Due
within
1 year
 Greater
than 1 year
but within
5 years
 Greater
than
5 years
 Total
exposure
  Due
within
1 year
 Greater
than 1 year
but within
5 years
 Greater
than
5 years
 Total
exposure
 

Direct outstandings

 $158 $88 $8 $254  $177 $46 $8 $231 

Unfunded lending commitments

 182 126 9 317  159 94 10 263 
                  

Total

 $340 $214 $17 $571  $336 $140 $18 $494 
                  

 


 At December 31, 2008  At December 31, 2009 
In billions of dollars Due
within
1 year
 Greater
than 1 year
but within
5 years
 Greater
than
5 years
 Total
exposure
  Due
within
1 year
 Greater
than 1 year
but within
5 years
 Greater
than
5 years
 Total
exposure
 

Direct outstandings

 $161 $100 $9 $270  $213 $66 $7 $286 

Unfunded lending commitments

 206 141 12 359  182 120 10 312 
                  

Total

 $367 $241 $21 $629  $395 $186 $17 $598 
                  

Portfolio Mix

        The corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking) is diverse across counterparty, and industry and geography. The following table shows direct outstandings and unfunded commitments by region:


 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
  June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

North America

 46% 48% 47% 51%

EMEA

 32 31  30 27 

Latin America

 9 8  7 9 

Asia

 13 13  16 13 
          

Total

 100% 100% 100% 100%
          

        The maintenance of accurate and consistent risk ratings across the corporate credit portfolio facilitates the comparison of credit exposure across all lines of business, geographic regions and products.

        Obligor risk ratings reflect an estimated probability of default for an obligor and are derived primarily through the use of statistical models (which are validated periodically), external rating agencies (under defined circumstances) or approved scoring methodologies. Facility risk ratings are assigned, using the obligor risk rating, and then factors that affect the loss-givenloss given default of the facility, such as support or collateral, are taken into account. With regard to climate change risk, factors evaluated include consideration of the business impact, impact of regulatory requirements, or lack thereof, and impact of physical effects on obligors and their assets.

        These factors may adversely affect the ability of some obligors to perform and thus increase the risk of lending activities to these obligors. Citigroup also has incorporated climate risk assessment criteria for certain obligors, as necessary.

        Internal obligor ratings equivalent to BBB and above are considered investment grade. Ratings below the equivalent of the BBB category are considered non-investment grade.

        The following table presents the corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking) by facility risk rating at SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, as a percentage of the total portfolio:


 Direct outstandings and
unfunded commitments
  Direct outstandings and
unfunded commitments
 

 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
  June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

AAA/AA/A

 54% 57% 55% 58%

BBB

 25 24  25 24 

BB/B

 13 13  13 11 

CCC or below

 8 6  7 7 

Unrated

      
          

Total

 100% 100% 100% 100%
          

        The corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking) is diversified by industry, with a concentration only in the financial sector, including banks, other financial institutions, insurance companies, investment banks, and government and central banks. The following table shows the allocation of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments to industries as a percentage of the total corporate portfolio:


 Direct outstandings and
unfunded commitments
  Direct outstandings and
unfunded commitments
 

 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
  June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

Government and central banks

 14% 12% 12% 12%

Banks

 8 9 

Investment banks

 6 7  7 5 

Banks

 10 7 

Other financial institutions

 5 5  5 12 

Petroleum

 5 4 

Utilities

 5 5  4 4 

Insurance

 4 4  4 4 

Petroleum

 5 4 

Agriculture and food preparation

 5 4  4 4 

Telephone and cable

 3 3  3 3 

Industrial machinery and equipment

 3 3  3 2 

Real estate

 3 3 

Global information technology

 2 3  2 2 

Chemicals

 3 3  2 2 

Other industries(1)

 35 40  38 34 
          

Total

 100% 100% 100% 100%
          

(1)
Includes all other industries, none of which exceeds 2% of total outstandings.

Table of Contents

Credit Risk Mitigation

        As part of its overall risk management activities, the CompanyCitigroup uses credit derivatives and other risk mitigants to hedge portions of the credit risk in its portfolio, in addition to outright asset sales. The purpose of these transactions is to transfer credit risk to third parties. The results of the mark-to-market and any realized gains or losses on credit derivatives are reflected in thePrincipal transactions line on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

        At SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008, $66.32009, $49.2 billion and $95.5$59.6 billion, respectively, of credit risk exposure were economically hedged. Citigroup's expected loss model used in the calculation of its loan loss reserve does not include the favorable impact of credit derivatives and other risk mitigants. In addition, the reported amounts of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments in this report do not reflect the impact of these hedging transactions. At SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying credit exposure with the following risk rating distribution, respectively:

Rating of Hedged Exposure


 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
  June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

AAA/AA/A

 45% 54% 48% 45%

BBB

 37 32  36 37 

BB/B

 11 9  11 11 

CCC or below

 7 5  5 7 
          

Total

 100% 100% 100% 100%
          

        At SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying credit exposure with the following industry distribution, respectively:distribution:

Industry of Hedged Exposure


 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
  June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

Utilities

 9% 10% 6% 9%

Telephone and cable

 8 9  7 9 

Agriculture and food preparation

 7 7  8 8 

Chemicals

 7 8 

Petroleum

 6 7  6 6 

Industrial machinery and equipment

 6 6  4 6 

Autos

 7 6 

Retail

 5 4 

Insurance

 4 5  4 4 

Chemicals

 7 5 

Retail

 4 5 

Other financial institutions

 4 4  7 4 

Autos

 5 4 

Pharmaceuticals

 5 4  4 5 

Natural gas distribution

 4 4  4 3 

Metals

 4 4 

Global information technology

 3 4  3 3 

Metals

 4 3 

Other industries(1)

 24 23  24 21 
          

Total

 100% 100% 100% 100%
          

(1)
Includes all other industries, none of which is greater than 2% of the total hedged amount.

Table of Contents


U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposure in Citi Holdings—Special Asset PoolMARKET RISK

        Market risk encompasses liquidity risk and price risk, both of which arise in the normal course of business of a global financial intermediary. Liquidity risk is the risk that an entity may be unable to meet a financial commitment to a customer, creditor, or investor when due. Liquidity risk is discussed in "Capital Resources and Liquidity" above. Price risk is the earnings risk from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, and in their implied volatilities. Price risk arises in non-trading portfolios, as well as in trading portfolios.

Interest Rate Exposure (IRE) for Non-Trading Portfolios

        The exposures in the following table represent the approximate annualized risk to net interest revenue (NIR), assuming an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100 basis points change, as well as a more gradual 100 basis points (25 basis points per quarter) parallel change in rates compared with the market forward interest rates in selected currencies.

 
 June 30, 2010 March 31, 2010 June 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Increase Decrease Increase Decrease Increase Decrease 

U.S. dollar

                 

Instantaneous change

 $(264)NM $(488)NM $(1,191) NM 

Gradual change

 $(179)NM $(110)NM $(694) NM 
              

Mexican peso

                 

Instantaneous change

 $60 $(60) $42 (42) $(21) 21 

Gradual change

 $33 $(33) $21 (21) $(15) 15 
              

Euro

                 

Instantaneous change

 $13 NM $(56)NM $26 $(25)

Gradual change

 $3 NM $(50)NM $(4)$4 
              

Japanese yen

                 

Instantaneous change

 $133 NM $148 NM $207  NM 

Gradual change

 $89 NM $97 NM $119  NM 
              

Pound sterling

                 

Instantaneous change

 $16 NM $(3)NM $(8) 8 

Gradual change

 $8 NM $(5)NM $(14) 14 
              

NM    Not meaningful. A 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would imply negative rates for the yield curve.

        The changes in the U.S. dollar IRE from the previous quarter reflect changes in the customer-related asset and liability mix, the expected impact of market rates on customer behavior and Citigroup's view of prevailing interest rates. The changes from the prior-year quarter primarily reflect modeling of mortgages and deposits based on lower rates, pricing changes due to the CARD Act, debt issuance and swapping activities, offset by repositioning of the liquidity portfolio.

        Certain trading-oriented businesses within Citi have accrual-accounted positions. The U.S. dollar IRE associated with these businesses is ($147) million for a 100 basis point instantaneous increase in interest rates.

        The following table summarizes Citigroup's U.S. subprime-related direct exposuresshows the risk to NIR from six different changes in Citi Holdings at September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009:the implied-forward rates. Each scenario assumes that the rate change will occur on a gradual basis every three months over the course of one year.

In billions of dollars
 June 30, 2009
exposures
 Third
Quarter
2009
write-ups
(downs)(1)
 Third Quarter
2009
Other(2)
 September 30, 2009
exposures
 

Direct ABS CDO super senior exposures:

             
 

Gross ABS CDO super senior exposures (A)

 $14.5       $15.1 
 

Hedged exposures (B)

  6.3        6.3 

Net ABS CDO super senior exposures:

             
 

ABCP/CDO(3)

  7.3 $1.6 $(1.3) 7.7 
 

High grade

  0.7  0.1    0.8 
 

Mezzanine

  0.2  0.2(4) (0.1) 0.3 
          

Total net ABS CDO super senior exposures (A-B=C)

 $8.3 $2.0 $(1.5)(4)$8.8 
          

Lending and structuring exposures (D)

 $1.4 $ $(0.1)$1.2 
          

Total net exposures (C+D)(5)(6)

 $9.6 $2.0 $(1.7)$10.0 
          

Credit adjustment on hedged counterparty exposures (E)(7)

    $(0.1)      
          

Total net write-ups (downs) (C+D+E)

    $1.9       
          
 
 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 6 

Overnight rate change (bps)

    100  200  (200) (100)  

10-year rate change (bps)

  (100)   100  (100)   100 
              

Impact to net interest revenue
(in millions of dollars)

 
$

(7

)

$

(86

)

$

(371

)
 
NM
  
NM
 
$

(49

)
              

Note: Table may not footNM    Not meaningful. A 100 basis point or cross-foot due to roundings.

(1)
Includes net profits and losses associated with liquidations.

(2)
Reflects sales, transfers and repayment or liquidations of principal.

(3)
Consists of older-vintage, high-grade ABS CDOs.

(4)
A portion of the underlying securities was purchased in liquidations of CDOs and reported asTrading account assets. As of September 30, 2009, $303 million relating to deals liquidated was heldmore decrease in the trading books.

(5)
Composed of net CDO super-senior exposures and gross lending and structuring exposures.

(6)
These $10.0 billion in net direct exposures includeovernight rate would imply negative rates for the $8.0 billion of assets reflected in the table entitled "Assets within Special Asset Pool" under "Citi Holdings—Special Asset Pool" above.

(7)
Adjustment related to counterparty credit risk.
yield curve.

        Citi Holdings had approximately $10.0 billion in net U.S. subprime-related direct exposures in the Special Asset Pool at September 30, 2009. The exposure consisted of (a) approximately $8.8 billion of net exposures in the super senior tranches (i.e., the most senior tranches) of CDOs, which are collateralized by asset-backed securities, derivatives on asset-backed securities, or both (ABS CDOs), and (b) approximately $1.2 billion of exposures in its lending and structuring business.

        The Special Asset Pool also has trading positions, both long and short, in U.S. subprime RMBS and related products, including ABS CDOs, which are not included in the figures above. The exposure from these positions is actively managed and hedged, although the effectiveness of the hedging products used may vary with material changes in market conditions.

Direct ABS CDO Super Senior Exposures

        The net $8.8 billion in ABS CDO super senior exposures as of September 30, 2009 is collateralized primarily by subprime RMBS, derivatives on RMBS, or both.

        Citi Holdings' CDO super senior subprime direct exposures are Level 3 assets. The valuation of the high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO positions uses trader prices based on the underlying assets of each high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO. Unlike the ABCP positions, the high-grade and mezzanine positions are now largely hedged through the ABX and bond short positions, which are trader priced. This results in closer symmetry in the way these long and short positions are valued by the business. Citi Holdings intends to use trader marks to value this portion of the portfolio going forward so long as it remains largely hedged.

        The valuation of the ABCP positions is subject to valuation based on significant unobservable inputs. Fair value of these exposures is based on estimates of future cash flows from the mortgage loans underlying the assets of the ABS CDOs. To determine the performance of the underlying mortgage loan portfolios, the Company estimates the prepayments, defaults and loss severities based on a number of macroeconomic factors. The model is calibrated using available mortgage loan information including historical loan performance. An appropriate discount rate is then applied to the cash flows generated for each ABCP tranche, in order to estimate its fair value under current market conditions.

        The valuation as of September 30, 2009 assumes a cumulative decline in U.S. housing prices from peak to trough of 30.5%. This rate assumes declines of 10% in 2009 and flat for 2010, respectively, the remainder of the 30.5% decline having already occurred before the end of 2008.

        The primary drivers that currently impact the model valuations are the discount rates used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows and projected mortgage loan performance. Each 10 basis point change in the discount rate used generally results in an approximate $26 million change in the fair value of the Company's direct ABCP exposures as of September 30, 2009.

        Estimates of the fair value of the CDO super senior exposures depend on market conditions and are subject to further change over time. For a further discussion of the valuation methodology and assumptions used to value direct ABS CDO super senior exposures to U.S. Subprime Mortgages, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Fair Value Measurement."


Table of Contents

Lending and Structuring ExposuresValue at Risk for Trading Portfolios

        For Citigroup's major trading centers, the aggregate pretax value at risk (VAR) in the trading portfolios was $214 million, $172 million, $205 million, and $277 million at June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, December 31, 2009, and June 30, 2009, respectively. Daily Citigroup trading VAR averaged $188 million and ranged from $163 million to $219 million during the second quarter of 2010.

The $1.2 billionfollowing table summarizes VAR for Citigroup trading portfolios at June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, and June 30, 2009, including the total VAR, the specific risk-only component of subprime-related exposures includes approximately $0.8 billionVAR, the isolated general market factor VARs, along with the quarterly averages. On April 30, 2010, Citigroup concluded its implementation of actively managed subprime loans purchasedexponentially weighted market factor volatilities for resale or securitizationInterest rate and FX positions to the VAR calculation. This methodology uses the higher of short- and long-term annualized volatilities. This enhancement resulted in a 31% increase inS&B VAR, and a 24% increase in Citigroup consolidated VAR, reported at a discount to par during 2007June 30, 2010.

In million of dollars June 30,
2010
 Second
Quarter
2010
Average
 March 31,
2010
 First
Quarter
2010
Average
 June 30,
2009
 Second
Quarter
2009
Average
 

Interest rate

 $244 $224 $201 $193 $226 $217 

Foreign exchange

  57  57  53  51  84  61 

Equity

  71  64  49  73  65  94 

Commodity

  24  21  17  18  36  38 

Diversification benefit

  (182) (178) (148) (135) (134) (150)
              

Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk

 $214 $188 $172 $200 $277 $260 
              

Specific risk-only component(1)

 $17 $16 $15 $20 $18 $20 
              

Total—General market factors only

 $197 $172 $157 $180 $259 $240 
              

(1)
The specific risk-only component represents the level of equity and approximately $0.4 billiondebt issuer-specific risk embedded in VAR.

        The table below provides the range of financing transactions with customers secured by subprime collateral,market factor VARs, inclusive of specific risk, across the quarters ended:

 
 June 30,
2010
 March 31,
2010
 June 30,
2009
 
In millions of dollars Low High Low High Low High 

Interest rate

 $198 $270 $171 $228 $193 $240 

Foreign exchange

  36  94  37  78  31  91 

Equity

  48  89  47  111  50  153 

Commodity

  15  27  15  20  26  50 
              

        The following table provides the VAR forS&B for the second quarter of 2010 and are carried at fair value.the first quarter of 2010:

In millions of dollars June 30,
2010
 March 31,
2010
 

Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk

 $176 $104 
      

Average—during quarter

  139  144 

High—during quarter

  180  235 

Low—during quarter

  100  99 
      

Table of Contents


Exposure to Commercial Real EstateINTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS

        ICG Average Rates—Interest Revenue, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Margin

GRAPHIC

In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2009(1)
 Change
2Q10 vs. 2Q09
 

Interest revenue(2)

 $20,418 $20,852 $19,671  4%

Interest expense(3)

  6,379  6,291  6,842  (7)%
          

Net interest revenue(2)(3)

 $14,039 $14,561  12,829  9%
          

Interest revenue—average rate

  4.57% 4.75% 4.97% (40) bps

Interest expense—average rate

  1.60% 1.60% 1.93% (33) bps

Net interest margin

  3.15% 3.32% 3.24% (9) bps
          

Interest-rate benchmarks:

             

Federal Funds rate—end of period

  0.00-0.25% 0.00-0.25% 0.00-0.25%  

Federal Funds rate—average rate

  0.00-0.25% 0.00-0.25% 0.00-0.25%  
          

Two-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate

  0.87% 0.92% 1.02% (15) bps

10-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate

  3.49% 3.72% 3.32% 17bps
          

10-year vs. two-year spread

  262bps 280bps 230bps   
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation and to exclude discontinued operations.

(2)
Excludes taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $149 million, $135 million, and $82 million for the second quarter of 2010, the first quarter of 2010, and the Special Asset Pool, through their business activitiessecond quarter of 2009, respectively.

(3)
Excludes expenses associated with hybrid financial instruments and as capital markets participants, incur exposures thatbeneficial interest in consolidated VIEs. These obligations are directly or indirectly tied to the commercial real estate market. These exposures are represented primarily by the following three categories:

        (1)   classified asAssets held at fair valueLong-term debt include approximately $5.7 billion, of which approximately $4.6 billion are securities, loans and other items linked to CRE that are carriedaccounted for at fair value as trading account assets,with changes recorded inPrincipal transactions.

        A significant portion of the Company's business activities are based upon gathering deposits and of which approximately $1.0 billion are securities backedborrowing money and then lending or investing those funds, including market-making activities in tradable securities. Net interest margin (NIM) is calculated by CRE carried at fair value as available-for-sale (AFS) investments. Changes in fair value for these trading account assets are reported in current earnings, while AFS investments are reported in OCI with other-than-temporary impairments reported in current earnings.dividing annualized gross interest revenue less gross interest expense by average interest earning assets.

        The majority of these exposures are classified as Level 3 in the fair-value hierarchy. Weakening activity in the trading markets for some of these instruments resulted in reduced liquidity, thereby decreasing the observable inputs for such valuations, and could have an adverse impact on how these instruments are valued in the future if such conditions persist.

        (2)   Assets held at amortized cost include approximately $1.8 billion of securities classified as HTM and $22.8 billion of loans and commitments. The HTM securities were classified as suchNIM decreased by 17 basis points during the fourthsecond quarter of 20082010 due to the continued de-risking of loan portfolios, the expansion of loss mitigation efforts and were previously classified as either trading or AFS. They are accounted for at amortized cost, subject to other-than-temporary impairment. Loans and commitments are recorded at amortized cost, less loan loss reserves. The impact from changes in credit is reflected in the calculation of the allowance for loan losses and in net credit losses.

        (3)   Equity and other investments include approximately $4.9 billion of equity and other investments such as limited partner fund investments which are accounted for under the equity method, which recognizes gains or losses based on the investor's share of the net income of the investee.Primerica divestiture.


Table of Contents


Direct Exposure to MonolinesAVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)

        Citi Holdings has exposure, via the Special Asset Pool, to various monoline bond insurers (Monolines), listed in the table below, from hedges on certain investments and from trading positions. The hedges are composed of credit default swaps and other hedge instruments. Citi Holdings recorded an additional $61 million in downward CVA related to exposure to Monolines during the third quarter of 2009, bringing the total CVA balance to $5.3 billion.

        The following table summarizes the market value of Citi Holdings' direct exposures to and the corresponding notional amounts of transactions with the various Monolines as well as the aggregate credit valuation adjustment associated with these exposures as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009.

 
 September 30, 2009 June 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars
 Fair-value
exposure
 Notional
amount of
transactions
 Fair-value exposure Notional
amount of
transactions
 

Direct subprime ABS CDO super senior—Ambac

 $4,495 $5,295 $4,525 $5,328 
          

Trading assets—non-subprime:

             

MBIA

 $1,898 $3,871 $2,123 $3,868 

FSA

  74  847  128  1,108 

Assured

  80  458  126  466 

Radian

  8  150  19  150 

Ambac

    407    407 
          

Subtotal trading assets—non-subprime

 $2,061 $5,733 $2,396 $5,999 
          

Total gross fair-value direct exposure

 $6,556    $6,921    

Credit valuation adjustment

  (5,274)    (5,213)   
          

Total net fair-value direct exposure

 $1,282    $1,708    
          
 
 Average Volume Interest Revenue % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

Assets

                            

Deposits with banks(5)

 $168,330 $166,378 $168,631 $291 $290 $377  0.69% 0.71% 0.90%
                    

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $186,283 $160,033 $131,522 $452 $471 $515  0.97% 1.19% 1.57%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  83,055  78,052  61,382  329  281  279  1.59  1.46  1.82 
                    

Total

 $269,338 $238,085 $192,904 $781 $752 $794  1.16% 1.28% 1.65%
                    

Trading account assets(7)(8)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $130,475 $131,776 $134,334 $1,019 $1,069 $1,785  3.13% 3.29% 5.33%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  149,628  152,403  120,468  992  803  1,136  2.66  2.14  3.78 
                    

Total

 $280,103 $284,179 $254,802 $2,011 $1,872 $2,921  2.88% 2.67% 4.60%
                    

Investments(1)

                            

In U.S. offices

                            
 

Taxable

 $157,621 $150,858 $123,181 $1,301 $1,389 $1,674  3.31% 3.73% 5.45%
 

Exempt from U.S. income tax

  15,305  15,570  16,293  197  173  247  5.16  4.51  6.08 

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  138,477  144,892  118,891  1,488  1,547  1,514  4.31  4.33  5.11 
                    

Total

 $311,403 $311,320 $258,365 $2,986 $3,109 $3,435  3.85% 4.05% 5.33%
                    

Loans (net of unearned income)(9)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $460,147 $479,384 $385,347 $9,153 $9,511 $6,254  7.98% 8.05% 6.51%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  249,353  254,488  270,594  5,074  5,162  5,675  8.16  8.23  8.41 
                    

Total

 $709,500 $733,872 $655,941 $14,227 $14,673 $11,929  8.04% 8.11% 7.29%
                    

Other interest-earning Assets

 $51,519 $45,894 $57,416 $122 $156 $215  0.95% 1.38% 1.50%
                    

Total interest-earning Assets

 $1,790,193 $1,779,728 $1,588,059 $20,418 $20,852 $19,671  4.57% 4.75% 4.97%
                       

Non-interest-earning assets(7)

  226,902  233,344  262,840                   
                          

Total Assets from discontinued operations

     $19,048                   
                          

Total assets

 $2,017,095 $2,013,072 $1,869,947                   
                    


(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $149 million, $135 million, and $82 million for the second quarter of 2010, the first quarter of 2010, and the second quarter of 2009, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary correction in certain countries.

(6)
Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41 and Interest revenue excludes the impact of (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41.

(7)
The fair-value exposure, netfair value carrying amounts of payablederivative and receivable positions, represents the market valueforeign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

(8)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of the contract as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, excluding the CVA. The notional amount of the transactions, including both long and short positions,ICG is usedreported as a reference valuereduction of Interest revenue.Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(9)
Includes cash-basis loans.

Reclassified to calculate payments. The CVA is a downward adjustmentconform to the fair-value exposure to a counterparty to reflect the counterparty's creditworthiness in respect of the obligations in question.

        Credit valuation adjustments are based on credit spreads and on estimates of the terms and timing of the payment obligations of the Monolines. Timing in turn depends on estimates of the performance of the transactions to which the Company's exposure relates, estimates of whether and when liquidation of such transactions may occur and other factors, each considered in the context of the terms of the Monolines' obligations.

        As of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, Citi Holdings had $6.3 billion in notional amount of hedges against its direct subprime ABS CDO super senior positions. Of those amounts, $5.3 billion was purchased from Monolines and is included in the notional amount of transactions in the table above.

        With respect to Citi Holdings' trading assets, there were $2.1 billion and $2.4 billion of fair-value exposure to Monolines as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively. Trading assets include trading positions, both long and short, in U.S. subprime RMBS and related products, including ABS CDOs.

        The notional amount of transactions related to the remaining non-subprime trading assets as of September 30, 2009 was $5.7 billion. Of the $5.7 billion, $5.0 billion was in the form of credit default swaps and total return swaps with a fair value exposure of $2.1 billion. The remaining notional amount comprised $697 million primarily in interest-rate swaps with a corresponding fair value exposure of $9 million net payable.

        The notional amount of transactions related to the remaining non-subprime trading assets at June 30, 2009 was $6.0 billion with a corresponding fair value exposure of $2.4 billion. Of the $6.0 billion, $5.0 billion was in the form of credit default swaps and total return swaps with a fair value of $2.4 billion. The remaining notional amount comprised $955 million primarily in interest-rate swaps with a corresponding fair value exposure of $2.1 million net payable.

        The Company has purchased mortgage insurance from various monoline mortgage insurers on first mortgage loans. The notional amount of this insurance protection was approximately $243 million and $316 million as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, with nominal pending claims against this notional amount.

        In addition, Citigroup has indirect exposure to Monolines in various other parts of its businesses. Indirect exposure includes circumstances in which the Company is not a contractual counterparty to the Monolines, but instead owns securities which may benefit from embedded credit enhancements provided by a Monoline. For example, corporate or municipal bonds in the trading business may be insured by the Monolines. The table and discussion above do not reflect this type of indirect exposure to the Monolines.current period's presentation.


Table of Contents


Highly Leveraged Financing TransactionsAVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)

        Highly leveraged financing commitments

 
 Average Volume Interest Expense % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 

Liabilities

                            

Deposits

                            

In U. S. offices

                            
 

Savings deposits(5)

 $186,070 $178,266 $173,168 $461 $458 $999  0.99% 1.04% 2.31%
 

Other time deposits

  48,171  54,391  57,869  100  143  278  0.83  1.07  1.93 

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  475,562  481,002  428,188  1,475  1,479  1,563  1.24  1.25  1.46 
                    

Total

 $709,803 $713,659 $659,225 $2,036 $2,080 $2,840  1.15% 1.18% 1.73%
                    

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $137,610 $120,695 $133,948 $237 $179 $288  0.69% 0.60% 0.86%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  100,759  79,447  74,346  560  475  643  2.23  2.42  3.47 
                    

Total

 $238,369 $200,142 $208,294 $797 $654 $931  1.34% 1.33% 1.79%
                    

Trading account liabilities(8)(9)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $39,709 $32,642 $19,592 $88 $44 $50  0.89% 0.55% 1.02%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  43,528  46,905  36,652  18  19  19  0.17  0.16  0.21 
                    

Total

 $83,237 $79,547 $56,244 $106 $63 $69  0.51% 0.32% 0.49%
                    

Short-term borrowings

                            

In U.S. offices

 $122,260 $152,785 $136,200 $181 $204 $209  0.59% 0.54% 0.62%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  33,630  27,659  35,299  34  72  106  0.41  1.06  1.20 
                    

Total

 $155,890 $180,444 $171,499 $215 $276 $315  0.55% 0.62% 0.74%
                    

Long-term debt(10)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $391,524 $397,113 $296,324 $3,011 $3,005 $2,427  3.08% 3.07% 3.29%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  23,369  25,955  29,318  214  213�� 260  3.67  3.33  3.56 
                    

Total

 $414,893 $423,068 $325,642 $3,225 $3,218 $2,687  3.12% 3.08% 3.31%
                    

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 $1,602,192 $1,596,860 $1,420,904 $6,379 $6,291 $6,842  1.60% 1.60% 1.93%
                       

Demand deposits in U.S. offices

  14,986  16,675  19,584                   

Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8)

  243,892  247,365  267,055                   

Total liabilities from discontinued operations

      12,122                   
                          

Total liabilities

 $1,861,070 $1,860,900 $1,719,665                   
                          

Citigroup equity(11)

 $153,798 $149,993 $148,448                   
                          

Noncontrolling Interest

 $2,227 $2,179  1,834                   
                          

Total Equity

 $156,025 $152,172 $150,282                   
                          

Total Liabilities and Equity

 $2,017,095 $2,013,072 $1,869,947                   
                    

Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)

                            

In U.S. offices

  1,087,675 $1,080,673 $944,819  8,136 $8,660 $6,452  3.00% 3.25% 2.74%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  702,518  699,055  643,240  5,903  5,901  6,377  3.37% 3.42  3.98 
                    

Total

 $1,790,193 $1,779,728 $1,588,059 $14,039 $14,561 $12,829  3.15% 3.32% 3.24%
                    

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $149 million, $135 million, and $82 million for the second quarter of 2010, the first quarter of 2010, and the second quarter of 2009, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are agreements that provide funding to a borrower with higher levels of debt (measured by the ratio of debt capital to equity capital of the borrower) than is generally the case for other companies. In recent years through mid-2008, highly leveraged financing had been commonly employed in corporate acquisitions, management buy-outs and similar transactions.

        In these financings, debt service (that is, principalunavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest payments) absorbs a significant portionexpense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Savings deposits consist of Insured Money Market Rate accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The interest expense includes FDIC deposit fees and charges of $242 million, $223 million and $670 million for three months ended June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively. Additionally, the cash flows generated bysecond quarter of 2009 includes the borrower's business. Consequently, the risk that the borrower may not be able to meet its debt obligations is greater. Due to this risk, theone-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million.

(6)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and fees chargedmonetary corrections in certain countries.

(7)
Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41and Interest expense excludes the impact of (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41.

(8)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

(9)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities ofICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue.Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(10)
Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified asLong-term debt as these obligations are accounted for this type of financing are generally higher thanat fair value with changes recorded inPrincipal Transactions.

(11)
Includes stockholders' equity from discontinued operations.

(12)
Includes allocations for other types of financing.

        Prior tocapital and funding highly leveraged financing commitments are assessed for impairment and losses are recorded when they are probable and reasonably estimable. For the portion of loan commitments that relates to loans that will be held for investment, loss estimates are madecosts based on the borrower's abilitylocation of the asset.

Reclassified to repayconform to the facility accordingcurrent period's presentation.


Table of Contents


AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)

 
 Average Volume Interest Revenue % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars Six Months
2010
 Six Months
2009
 Six Months
2010
 Six Months
2009
 Six Months
2010
 Six Months
2009
 

Assets

                   

Deposits with banks(5)

 $167,354 $168,887 $581 $813  0.70% 0.97%
              

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $173,158 $129,763 $923 $1,065  1.07% 1.66%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  80,554  56,907  610  614  1.53  2.18 
              

Total

 $253,712 $186,670 $1,533 $1,679  1.22% 1.81%
              

Trading account assets(7)(8)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $131,126 $140,925 $2,088 $3,769  3.21% 5.39%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  151,015  114,460  1,795  2,103  2.40  3.71 
              

Total

 $282,141 $255,385 $3,883 $5,872  2.78% 4.64%
              

Investments(1)

                   

In U.S. offices

                   
 

Taxable

 $154,239 $122,541 $2,690 $3,154  3.52% 5.19%
 

Exempt from U.S. income tax

  15,438  15,434  370  365  4.83  4.77 

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  141,685  112,921  3,035  3,092  4.32  5.52 
              

Total

 $311,362 $250,896 $6,095 $6,611  3.95% 5.31%
              

Loans (net of unearned income)(9)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $469,765 $394,408 $18,663 $13,085  8.01% 6.69%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  251,921  269,421  10,237  11,699  8.19  8.76 
              

Total

 $721,686 $663,829 $28,900 $24,784  8.08% 7.53%
              

Other interest-earning assets

 $48,707 $54,524 $278 $495  1.15% 1.83%
              

Total interest-earning assets

 $1,784,962 $1,580,191 $41,270 $40,254  4.66% 5.14%
                

Non-interest-earning assets(7)

  230,122  289,207             

Total assets from discontinued operations

    19,566             
                  

Total assets

 $2,015,084 $1,888,964             
              

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $284 million and $179 million for the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary correction in certain countries.

(6)
Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to its contractual terms. Forresell are reported net pursuant to (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41 and interest revenue excludes the portionimpact of loan commitments that relates to loans that will be held-for-sale, loss estimates(ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41.

(7)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are madereported in reference to current conditions in the resale market (both interest rate risk and credit risk are considered in the estimate). Loan origination, commitment, underwritingnon-interest-earning assets and other feesnon-interest bearing liabilities.

(8)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities ofICG is reported as a reduction ofInterest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are netted against any recorded losses.reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(9)
Includes cash-basis loans.

Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.


Table of Contents

        Citigroup generally manages
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)

 
 Average Volume Interest Expense % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars Six Months
2010
 Six Months
2009
 Six Months
2010
 Six Months
2009
 Six Months
2010
 Six Months
2009
 

Liabilities

                   

Deposits

                   

In U. S. offices

                   
 

Savings deposits(5)

 $182,168 $169,073 $919 $1,632  1.02% 1.95%
 

Other time deposits

  51,281  59,576  243  694  0.96  2.35 

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  478,282  418,514  2,954  3,362  1.25  1.62 
              

Total

 $711,731 $647,163 $4,116 $5,688  1.17% 1.77%
              

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $129,153 $143,102 $416 $604  0.65% 0.85%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  90,103  71,265  1,035  1,431  2.32  4.05 
              

Total

 $219,256 $214,367 $1,451 $2,035  1.33% 1.91%
              

Trading account liabilities(8)(9)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $36,176 $20,152 $132 $143  0.74% 1.43%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  45,216  33,877  37  34  0.17  0.20 
              

Total

 $81,392 $54,029 $169 $177  0.42% 0.66%
              

Short-term borrowings

                   

In U.S. offices

 $137,522 $142,437 $385 $576  0.56% 0.82%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  30,645  35,257  106  202  0.70  1.16 
              

Total

 $168,167 $177,694 $491 $778  0.59% 0.88%
              

Long-term debt(10)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $394,318 $302,997 $6,016 $5,247  3.08% 3.49%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  24,662  31,688  427  574  3.49  3.65 
              

Total

 $418,980 $334,685  6,443 $5,821  3.10% 3.51%
              

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 $1,599,526 $1,427,938  12,670 $14,499  1.60% 2.05%
                

Demand deposits in U.S. offices

  15,831  17,486             

Other non-interest bearing liabilities(8)

  245,629  283,835             

Total liabilities from discontinued operations

    11,910             
                  

Total liabilities

 $1,860,986 $1,741,169             
                  

Total Citigroup equity(11)

 $151,895 $145,873             

Noncontrolling interest

  2,203  1,922             
                  

Total Equity

 $154,098 $147,795             
                  

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $2,015,084 $1,888,964             
              

Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $1,084,175 $957,624 $16,796 $13,095  3.12% 2.76%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  700,787  622,567  11,804  12,660  3.40% 4.10 
              

Total

 $1,784,962 $1,580,191 $28,600 $25,755  3.23% 3.29%
              

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $284 million and $179 million for the first six months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with highly leveraged financings it has entered intothe respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by seeking to sell a majoritycertain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Savings deposits consist of its exposures toInsured Money Market Rate accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The interest expense includes FDIC deposit fees and charges of $465 million and $969 million for the market prior to or shortly after funding. In certain cases, all or a portion of a highly leveraged financing to be retained is hedged with credit derivatives or other hedging instruments. Thus, when a highly leveraged financing is funded, Citigroup recordssix months ended June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2009, respectively. Additionally, the resulting loan as follows:

    the portion that Citigroup will seek to sell is recorded as a loan held-for-sale inOther assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and measured at the lower of cost or market (LOCOM); and

    the portion that will be retained is recorded as a loan held-for-investment inLoans and measured at amortized cost less a reserve for loan losses.

        Due to the dislocation of the credit markets and the reduced market interest in higher-risk/higher-yield instruments since the latter half of 2007, liquidity in the market for highly leveraged financings has been limited. This has resulted in the Company's recording pretax write-downs on funded and unfunded highly leveraged finance exposures of $24 million in the thirdsecond quarter of 2009 bringingincludes the cumulative write-downs forone-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million.

(6)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(7)
Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41 and interest expense excludes the first nine monthsimpact of 2009 to $508 million.

        Citigroup's exposures to highly leveraged financing commitments totaled $6.2 billion at September 30, 2009 ($5.9 billion funded(ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41.

(8)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and $0.3 billionforeign exchange contracts are reported in unfunded commitments)non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest bearing liabilities.

(9)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities ofICG is reported as a reduction ofInterest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, reflecting a decrease of $2.3 billion from June 30, 2009.

        In 2008, the Company completed the transfer of approximately $12.0 billion of loans to third parties, of which $8.5 billion relates to highly leveraged loan commitments. Inrespectively.

(10)
Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified asLong-term debt as these transactions, the third parties purchased subordinate interests backed by the transferred loans. These subordinate interests absorb first loss on the transferred loans and provide the third parties with control of the loans. The Company retained senior debt securities backed by the transferred loans. These transactions wereobligations are accounted for as sales of the transferred loans. The loans were removed from the balance sheet and the retained securities are classified as AFS securities on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

at fair value with changes recorded inPrincipal Transactions. In addition, the Company purchased protectionmajority of the funding provided by Corporate Treasury to CitiCapital is excluded from this line.

(11)
Includes stockholders' equity from discontinued operations.

(12)
Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the senior debt securities fromlocation of the third-party subordinate interest holders via total return swaps (TRS). The counterparty credit risk in the TRS is protected through margin agreements that provide for both initial margin and additional margin at specified triggers. Dueasset.

Reclassified to conform to the initial cash margin received, the existing margin requirements on the TRS, and the substantive subordinate investments made by third parties, the Company believes that the transactions largely mitigate the Company's risk related to the transferred loans.

        The Company's sole remaining exposure to the transferred loans are the senior debt securities, which have an amortized cost basis of $6.8 billion and fair value of $6.9 billion at September 30, 2009, and the payables under the TRS, which have a fair value of $0.1 billion at September 30, 2009. The change in the value of the retained senior debt securities that are classified as AFS securities are recorded in AOCI as they are deemed temporary. The offsetting change in the TRS are recorded as cash flow hedges within AOCI. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.current period's presentation.


Table of Contents


ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

 
 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 1st Qtr. 2010 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009 
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 

Deposits with banks(4)

 $3 $(2)$1 $(1)$(85)$(86)
              

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

                   

In U.S. offices

 $71 $(90)$(19)$172 $(235)$(63)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  19  29  48  89  (39) 50 
              

Total

 $90 $(61)$29 $261 $(274)$(13)
              

Trading account assets(5)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $(10)$(40)$(50)$(50)$(716)$(766)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (15) 204  189  238  (382) (144)
              

Total

 $(25)$164 $139 $188 $(1,098)$(910)
              

Investments(1)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $59 $(123)$(64)$394 $(817)$(423)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (69) 10  (59) 229  (255) (26)
              

Total

 $(10)$(113)$(123)$623 $(1,072)$(449)
              

Loans (net of unearned income)(6)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $(383)$25 $(358)$1,341 $1,558 $2,899 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (104) 16  (88) (436) (165) (601)
              

Total

 $(487)$41 $(446) 905 $1,393 $2,298 
              

Other interest-earning assets

 $17 $(51)$(34)$(20)$(73)$(93)
              

Total interest revenue

 $(412)$(22)$(434)$1,956 $(1,209)$747 
              

(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilitiesofICGis reported as a reduction ofInterest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assetsandTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(6)
Includes cash-basis loans.

Table of Contents


ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

 
 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 1st Qtr. 2010 2nd Qtr. 2010 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009 
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 

Deposits

                   

In U.S. offices

 $4 $(44)$(40)$17 $(733) (716)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (17) 13  (4) 162  (250) (88)
              

Total

 $(13)$(31)$(44)$179 $(983) (804)
              

Federal funds purchased and
securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

                   

In U.S. offices

 $27 $31 $58 $8 $(59) (51)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  120  (35) 85  188  (271) (83)
              

Total

 $147 $(4)$143 $196 $(330) (134)
              

Trading account liabilities(5)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $11 $33 $44 $45 $(7) 38 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (1)   (1) 3  (4) (1)
              

Total

 $10 $33 $43 $48 $(11) 37 
              

Short-term borrowings

                   

In U.S. offices

 $(44)$21 $(23)$(21)$(7) (28)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  13  (51) (38) (5) (67) (72)
              

Total

 $(31)$(30)$(61)$(26)$(74) (100)
              

Long-term debt

                   

In U.S. offices

 $(43)$49 $6 $740 $(156) 584 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (22) 23  1  (54) 8  (46)
              

Total

 $(65)$72 $7 $686 $(148) 538 
              

Total interest expense

 $48 $40 $88 $1,083 $(1,546) (463)
              

Net interest revenue

 $(460)$(62)$(522)$873 $337  1,210 
              

(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilitiesofICGis reported as a reduction ofInterest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assetsandTrading account liabilities, respectively.

Table of Contents

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE, INTEREST EXPENSE, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

 
 Six Months 2010 vs. Six Months 2009 
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change(2)
 

Deposits at interest with banks(4)

 $(7)$(225)$(232)
        

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

          

In U.S. offices

 $295 $(437)$(142)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  211  (215) (4)
        

Total

 $506 $(652)$(146)
        

Trading account assets(5)

          

In U.S. offices

 $(247)$(1,434)$(1,681)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  559  (867) (308)
        

Total

 $312 $(2,301)$(1,989)
        

Investments(1)

          

In U.S. offices

 $704 $(1,163)$(459)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  695  (752) (57)
        

Total

 $1,399 $(1,915)$(516)
        

Loans (net of unearned income)(6)

          

In U.S. offices

 $2,743 $2,836 $5,579 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (735) (727) (1,462)
        

Total

 $2,008 $2,109 $4,117 
        

Other interest-earning assets

 $(48)$(169)$(217)
        

Total interest revenue

 $4,170 $(3,153)$1,017 
        

Deposits

          

In U.S. offices

 $48 $(1,212)$(1,164)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  438  (846) (408)
        

Total

 $486 $(2,058)$(1,572)
        

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

          

In U.S. offices

 $(55)$(133)$(188)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  317  (712) (395)
        

Total

 $262 $(845)$(583)
        

Trading account liabilities(5)

          

In U.S. offices

 $79 $(90)$(11)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  10  (7) 3 
        

Total

 $89 $(97)$(8)
        

Short-term borrowings

          

In U.S. offices

 $(19)$(172)$(191)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (24) (72) (96)
        

Total

 $(43)$(244)$(287)
        

Long-term debt

          

In U.S. offices

 $1,447 $(678)$769 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (123) (24) (147)
        

Total

 $1,324 $(702)$622 
        

Total interest expense

 $2,118 $(3,946)$(1,828)
        

Net interest revenue

 $2,052 $793 $2,845 
        

(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilitiesofICGis reported as a reduction ofInterest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assetsandTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(6)
Includes cash-basis loans.

Table of Contents


CROSS BORDER RISK

        The table below shows all countries where total Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) cross-border outstandings exceed 0.75% of total Citigroup assets:

 
 Cross-Border Claims on Third Parties June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
In billions of U.S.
dollars
 Banks Public Private Total Trading and
Short-Term
Claims
 Investments
in and
Funding of
Local
Franchises
 Total
Cross-Border
Outstandings
 Commitments Total
Cross-Border
Outstandings
 Commitments 

France

 $10.8 $11.3 $12.1 $34.2 $26.0 $2.6 $36.8 $62.4 $33.0 $68.5 

Germany

  13.7  6.5  6.1  26.3  21.9  6.8  33.1  62.8  30.2  53.1 

India

  1.8  0.4  6.2  8.4  6.0  17.1  25.5  1.9  24.9  1.8 

Cayman Islands

  0.3  0.7  20.6  21.6  20.9    21.6  4.7  18.0  6.1 

United Kingdom

  10.9  1.0  8.0  19.9  17.8    19.9  142.5  17.1  138.5 

South Korea

  1.7  0.4  2.9  5.0  4.8  11.4  16.4  15.1  17.4  14.4 

Mexico

  2.0  1.2  3.7  6.9  4.4  8.4  15.3  21.7  12.8  21.2 

Netherlands

  4.6  2.7  8.0  15.3  9.7    15.3  45.2  20.3  65.5 

Italy

  1.1  9.4  2.4  12.9  11.2  0.9  13.8  16.4  21.7  21.2 

Venezuelan Operations

        In 2003, the Venezuelan government enacted currency restrictions that have restricted Citigroup's ability to obtain U.S. dollars in Venezuela at the official foreign currency rate. In May 2010, the government enacted new laws that have closed the parallel foreign exchange market and established a new foreign exchange market. Citigroup does not have access to U.S. dollars in this new market. Citigroup uses the official rate to re-measure the foreign currency transactions in the financial statements of its Venezuelan operations, which have U.S. dollar functional currencies, into U.S. dollars. At June 30, 2010, Citigroup had net monetary assets in its Venezuelan operations denominated in bolivars of approximately $200 million.


Table of Contents


DERIVATIVES

        See Note 1615 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion and disclosures related to the Company's DerivativeCitigroup's derivative activities. The following discussions relate to the Fair Valuation AdjustmentAdjustments for Derivatives and Credit Derivatives activities.

Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives

        The fair value adjustments applied by the Company to its derivative carrying values consist of the following items:

        The Company's CVA methodology comprises two steps. First, the exposure profile for each counterparty is determined using the terms of all individual derivative positions and a Monte Carlo simulation or other quantitative analysis to generate a series of expected cash flows at future points in time. The calculation of this exposure profile considers the effect of credit risk mitigants, including pledged cash or other collateral and any legal right of offset that exists with a counterparty through arrangements such as netting agreements. Individual derivative contracts that are subject to an enforceable master netting agreement with a counterparty are aggregated for this purpose, since it is those aggregate net cash flows that are subject to nonperformance risk. This process identifies specific, point in time future cash flows that are subject to nonperformance risk, rather than using the current recognized net asset or liability as a basis to measure the CVA.

        Second, market-based views of default probabilities derived from observed credit spreads in the credit default swap market, are applied to the expected future cash flows determined in step one. Own-credit CVA is determined using Citi-specific CDS spreads for the relevant tenor. Generally, counterparty CVA is determined using CDS spread indices for each credit rating and tenor. For certain identified facilities where individual analysis is practicable (for example, exposures to monoline counterparties) counterparty-specific CDS spreads are used.

        The CVA adjustment is designed to incorporate a market view of the credit risk inherent in the derivative portfolio. However, most derivative instruments are negotiated bilateral contracts and are not commonly transferred to third parties. Derivative instruments are normally settled contractually, or if terminated early, are terminated at a value negotiated bilaterally between the counterparties. Therefore, the CVA (both counterparty and own-credit) may not be realized upon a settlement or termination in the normal course of business.

        In addition, all or a portion of the CVA may be reversed or otherwise adjusted in future periods in the event of changes in the credit risk of Citi or its counterparties, or changes in the credit mitigants (collateral and netting agreements) associated with the derivative instruments. Historically, Citigroup's credit spreads have moved in tandem with general counterparty credit spreads, thus providing offsetting CVAs affecting revenue. However, in the first quarter of 2009, Citigroup's credit spreads widened and counterparty credit spreads generally narrowed, each of which positively affected revenues. Conversely, in the second and third quarters of 2009, Citigroup's credit spreads narrowed and negatively affected revenues.

        The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses) related to changes in CVAs on derivative instruments for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively:

 
 Credit valuation
adjustment gain (loss)
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Non-monoline counterparties

 $855 $(851)

Citigroup (own)

  (1,534) 1,951 
      

Net non-monoline CVA

 $(679)$1,100 

Monoline counterparties

  (61) (920)
      

Total CVA—derivative instruments

 $(740)$180 
      

        The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses) related to changes in CVAs on derivative instruments for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively:

 
 Credit valuation
adjustment gain (loss)
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

Non-monoline counterparties

 $5,387 $(2,236)

Citigroup (own)

  (1,891) 3,165 
      

Net non-monoline CVA

 $3,496 $929 

Monoline counterparties

  (995) (4,839)
      

Total CVA—derivative instruments

 $2,501 $(3,910)
      

        The table below summarizes the CVA applied to the fair value of derivative instruments as of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008, respectively.2009.


 Credit valuation adjustment
Contra liability (contra asset)
  Credit valuation adjustment
Contra-liability (contra-asset)
 
In millions of dollars September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008  June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 

Non-monoline counterparties

 $(2,878)$(8,266) $(3,618)$(3010)

Citigroup (own)

 1,754 3,611  1,567 1,401 
          

Net non-monoline CVA

 $(1,124)$(4,655) $(2,051)$(1,609)

Monoline counterparties(1)

 (5,274) (4,279) (1,637) (5,580)
          

Total CVA—derivative instruments

 $(6,398)$(8,934) $(3,688)$(7,189)
     

(1)
The reduction in CVA on derivative instruments with monoline counterparties includes $3.5 billion of utilizations/releases in the second quarter of 2010.

        The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses) related to changes in credit valuation adjustments on derivative instruments, net of hedges:

 
 Credit valuation
adjustment gain (loss)
 
In millions of dollars Second Quarter
2010
 Second Quarter
2009(1)
 Six months
ended June 30,
2010
 Six months
ended June 30,
2009(1)
 

CVA on derivatives, excluding monolines

 $(247)$734 $67 $3,215 

CVA related to monoline counterparties

  35  157  433  (933)
          

Total CVA—derivative instruments

 $(212)$891 $500 $2,282 
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

        The CVA amounts shown above relate solely to the derivative portfolio, and do not include:


Table of Contents

Note 1716 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

Credit Derivatives

        The CompanyCitigroup makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives, both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account. Through these contracts the CompanyCitigroup either purchases or writes protection on either a single-name or portfolio basis. The CompanyCiti primarily uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate loan portfolio and other cash positions, to take proprietary trading positions, and to facilitate client transactions.

        Credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of pre-definedpredefined events (settlement triggers). These settlement triggers, which are defined by the form of the derivative and the referenced credit, and are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy (or comparable events) of the reference credit and, in a more limited range of transactions, debt restructuring.

        Credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium. In certain transactions on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities, the seller of protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount.


Table of Contents

        The following tables summarize the key characteristics of the Company'sCiti's credit derivativederivatives portfolio by counterparty and derivative instrumentform as of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008, respectively:2009:

SeptemberJune 30, 2010:

 
 Fair values Notionals 
In millions of dollars Receivable Payable Beneficiary Guarantor 

By industry/counterparty

             

Bank

 $50,506 $47,514 $830,163 $772,889 

Broker-dealer

  20,231  20,702  312,437  298,884 

Monoline

  2,047    4,395   

Non-financial

  300  120  1,448  368 

Insurance and other financial institutions

  12,370  9,331  142,036  109,183 
          

Total by industry/counterparty

 $85,454 $77,667 $1,290,479 $1,181,324 
          

By instrument

             

Credit default swaps and options

 $84,597 $76,620 $1,267,276 $1,180,087 

Total return swaps and other

  857  1,047  23,203  1,237 
          

Total by instrument

 $85,454 $77,667 $1,290,479 $1,181,324 
          

By rating:

             

Investment grade

 $25,005 $19,772 $595,049 $526,043 

Non-investment grade(1)

  60,449  57,895  695,430  655,281 
          

Total by Rating

 $85,454 $77,667 $1,290,479 $1,181,324 
          

By maturity:

             

Within 1 year

 $2,169 $1,995 $142,787 $137,914 

From 1 to 5 years

  51,222  44,993  917,276  832,146 

After 5 years

  32,063  30,679  230,416  211,264 
          

Total by maturity

 $85,454 $77,667 $1,290,479 $1,181,324 
          

December 31, 2009:

 
 Fair values Notionals 
In millions of dollars Receivable Payable Beneficiary Guarantor 

By Industry/Counterparty:

             

Bank

 $62,785 $61,679 $914,418 $860,437 

Broker-dealer

  23,425  22,323  321,199  301,216 

Monoline

  6,572  1  8,299   

Non-financial

  181  193  3,405  2,127 

Insurance and other financial institutions

  19,264  16,379  202,054  151,326 
          

Total by Industry/Counterparty

 $112,227 $100,575 $1,449,375 $1,315,106 
          

By Instrument:

             

Credit default swaps and options

 $107,770 $99,376 $1,418,691 $1,314,282 

Total return swaps

  4,457  1,199  30,684  824 
          

Total by Instrument

 $112,227 $100,575 $1,449,375 $1,315,106 
          

December 31, 2008(1):


 Fair values Notionals  Fair values Notionals 
In millions of dollars Receivable Payable Beneficiary Guarantor  Receivable Payable Beneficiary Guarantor 

By Industry/Counterparty:

 

By industry/counterparty

 

Bank

 $128,042 $121,811 $996,248 $943,949  $52,383 $50,778 $872,523 $807,484 

Broker-dealer

 59,321 56,858 403,501 365,664  23,241 22,932 338,829 340,949 

Monoline

 6,886 91 9,973 139  5,860  10,018 33 

Non-financial

 4,874 2,561 5,608 7,540  339 371 1,781 623 

Insurance and other financial institutions

 29,228 22,388 180,354 125,988  10,969 8,343 109,811 64,964 
                  

Total by Industry/Counterparty

 $228,351 $203,709 $1,595,684 $1,443,280 

Total by industry/counterparty

 $92,792 $82,424 $1,332,962 $1,214,053 
                  

By Instrument:

 

By instrument

 

Credit default swaps and options

 $221,159 $203,220 $1,560,222 $1,441,375  $91,625 $81,174 $1,305,724 $1,213,208 

Total return swaps

 7,192 489 35,462 1,905 

Total return swaps and other

 1,167 1,250 27,238 845 
                  

Total by Instrument

 $228,351 $203,709 $1,595,684 $1,443,280 

Total by instrument

 $92,792 $82,424 $1,332,962 $1,214,053 
                  

By rating:

 

Investment grade

 $26,666 $22,469 $656,876 $576,930 

Non-investment grade(1)

 66,126 59,995 676,086 637,123 
         

Total by Rating

 $92,792 $82,424 $1,332,962 $1,214,053 
         

By maturity:

 

Within 1 year

 $2,167 $2,067 $173,880 $165,056 

From 1 to 5 years

 54,079 47,350 877,573 806,143 

After 5 years

 36,546 33,007 281,509 242,854 
         

Total by maturity

 $92,792 $82,424 $1,332,962 $1,214,053 
         

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.Also includes not rated credit derivative instruments.

Table of Contents

        The fair values shown are prior to the application of any netting agreements, cash collateral, and market or credit value adjustments.

        The CompanyCitigroup actively participates in trading a variety of credit derivatives products as both an active two-way market-maker for clients and to manage credit risk. The majority of this activity was transacted with other financial intermediaries, including both banks and broker-dealers. The CompanyCitigroup generally has a mismatch between the total notional amounts of protection purchased and sold and it may hold the reference assets directly, rather than entering into offsetting credit derivative contracts as and when desired. The open risk exposures from credit derivative contracts are largely matched after certain cash positions in reference assets are considered and after notional amounts are adjusted, either to a duration-based equivalent basis or to reflect the level of subordination in tranched structures.

        The CompanyCiti actively monitors its counterparty credit risk in credit derivative contracts. Approximately 87%91% and 85% of the gross receivables as of September 30, 2009 are from counterparties with which the CompanyCiti maintains collateral agreements.agreements as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. A majority of the Company'sCiti's top 15 counterparties (by receivable balance owed to the Company)company) are banks, financial institutions or other dealers. Contracts with these counterparties do not include ratings-based termination events. However, counterparty ratingratings downgrades may have an incremental effect by lowering the threshold at which the CompanyCitigroup may call for additional collateral. A number of the remaining significant counterparties are monolines.


Table of Contentsmonolines (which have CVA as shown above).


MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESSINCOME TAXES

        Market risk encompasses liquidity risk and price risk, bothDeferred Tax Assets (DTA)

        Deferred taxes are recorded for the future consequences of which ariseevents that have been recognized in the normal coursefinancial statements or tax returns, based upon enacted tax laws and rates. DTAs are recognized subject to management's judgment that realization is more likely than not.

        As of businessJune 30, 2010, Citigroup had recognized net DTAs of approximately $49.9 billion, a global financial intermediary. Liquidity riskdecrease of $0.3 billion from $50.2 billion at March 31, 2010.

        Although realization is not assured, Citi believes that the realization of the recognized net deferred tax asset of $49.9 billion at June 30, 2010 is more likely than not based on expectations as to future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which the DTAs arise and, based on available tax planning strategies as defined in ASC 740,Income Taxes, that could be implemented if necessary to prevent a carryforward from expiring.

        Approximately $19 billion of Citigroup's DTAs is represented by U.S. federal, foreign, state and local tax return carry-forwards subject to expiration substantially beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2029. Included in Citi's overall net DTAs of $49.9 billion is $31 billion of future tax deductions and credits that arose largely due to timing differences between the recognition of income for GAAP and tax purposes and represent net deductions and credits that have not yet been taken on a tax return. The most significant source of these timing differences is the risk that an entityloan loss reserve build, which accounts for approximately $19 billion of the net DTAs. In general, Citi would need to recognize approximately $99 billion of taxable income, primarily in U.S. taxable jurisdictions, during the respective carryforward periods to fully realize its U.S. federal, state and local DTAs.

        Citi's ability to utilize its DTAs to offset future taxable income may be unable to meet a financial commitment to a customer, creditor, or investor when due. Liquidity risk is discussedsignificantly limited if Citi experiences an "ownership change," as defined in "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below. Price risk isSection 382 of the earnings risk from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, and in their implied volatilities. Price risk arises in non-trading portfolios,Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as well as in trading portfolios.

Interest Rate Exposure (IRE)

        The exposures in the following table represent the approximate annualized risk to Net Interest Revenue (NIR) assumingamended (the "Code"). In general, an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100 basis points change, as well as a more gradual 100 basis points (25 basis points per quarter) parallel change in rates as compared with the market forward interest rates in selected currencies.

 
 September 30, 2009 June 30, 2009 September 30, 2008 
In millions of dollars Increase Decrease Increase Decrease Increase Decrease 

U.S. dollar

                   

Instantaneous change

 $(1,193)$1,427 $(1,767)$1,935 $(1,811)$893 

Gradual change

 $(563)$526 $(1,005)$936 $(707)$490 
              

Mexican peso

                   

Instantaneous change

 $25 $(25)$(21)$21 $(23)$23 

Gradual change

 $11 $(11)$(15)$15 $(19)$19 
              

Euro

                   

Instantaneous change

 $52 $(4)$(29)$21 $(52)$52 

Gradual change

 $12 $(12)$(35)$35 $(41)$41 
              

Japanese yen

                   

Instantaneous change

 $228  NM $215  NM $142  NM 

Gradual change

 $135  NM $122  NM $72  NM 
              

Pound sterling

                   

Instantaneous change

 $(11)$24 $(11)$11 $16 $(16)

Gradual change

 $(11)$11 $(14)$14 $13 $(13)
              

NM    Not meaningful. A 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would imply negative rates for the Japanese yen yield curve.

        The changes in the U.S. dollar interest rate exposures from June 30, 2009 to September 30, 2009 are related to customer-related asset and liability mix, term debt issuance, as well as Citigroup's view of prevailing interest rates.

        Certain risk positions in the non-trading portfolio are economically hedged with offsetting positions in the mark-to-market portfolio, which are reflected in the Value at Risk metrics. If the effect of these hedging transactions were netted against the non-trading portfolio it would reduce Citi's risk from an instantaneous parallel increase in rates from ($1,193) million to ($569) million and decrease Citi's opportunity from an instantaneous parallel decrease in rates from $1,427 million to $803 million.

        The following table shows the risk to NIR from six different changes in the implied forward rates. Each scenario assumes that the rateownership change will occur onif there is a gradual basis every three months over the course of one year.

 
 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 6 

Overnight rate change (bp)

    100  200  (200) (100)  

10-year rate change (bp)

  (100)   100  (100)   100 

Impact to net interest revenue
(in millions of dollars)

 
$

8
 
$

(514

)

$

(1,131

)

$

62
 
$

269
 
$

(61

)
              

Table of Contents

Value at Risk

        For Citigroup's major trading centers, the aggregate pretax value at risk (VAR)cumulative change in Citi's ownership by "5% shareholders" (as defined in the trading portfolios was $273 million, $277 million, $319 million and $237 million at September 30, 2009, June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, respectively. Daily Citigroup trading VAR averaged $281 million and ranged from $247 millionCode) that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. A corporation that experiences an ownership change will generally be subject to $312 million during the third quarter of 2009. The following table summarizes VAR for Citigroup trading portfolios at September 30, 2009, June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, including the total VAR, the specific risk only component of VAR, and general market factor VAR's, along with the quarterly averages:

In million of dollars September 30,
2009
 Third
Quarter
2009
Average
 June 30,
2009
 Second
Quarter
2009
Average
 December 31,
2008
 Fourth
Quarter
2008
Average
 September 30,
2008
 Third
Quarter
2008
Average
 

Interest rate

 $240 $237 $226 $217 $320 $272 $240 $265 

Foreign exchange

  98  90  84  61  118  80  40  43 

Equity

  51  62  65  94  84  94  106  99 

Commodity

  41  38  36  38  15  16  20  20 

Diversification benefit

  (157) (146) (134) (150) (218) (167) (169) (187)
                  

Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk

 $273 $281 $277 $260 $319 $295 $237 $240 
                  

Specific risk only component

 $12 $17 $18 $20 $8  25 $20 $14 
                  

Total—General market factors only

 $261 $264 $259 $240 $311 $270 $217 $226 
                  

        The specific risk only component represents the level of equity and debt issuer-specific risk embedded in VAR. Citigroup's specific risk model conformsan annual limitation on its pre-ownership change DTAs equal to the 4x-multiplier treatmentvalue of the corporation immediately before the ownership change, multiplied by the long-term tax-exempt rate (subject to certain adjustments); provided that the annual limitation would be increased each year to the extent that there is an unused limitation in a prior year. The limitation arising from an ownership change under Section 382 on Citigroup's ability to utilize its DTAs will depend on the value of Citigroup's stock at the time of the ownership change.

        Under IRS Notice 2010-2, Citigroup will not experience an ownership change within the meaning of Section 382 as a result of the sales of its common stock held by the U.S. Treasury.

        Approximately $15 billion of the net deferred tax asset is included in Tier 1 and is subject to extensive annual hypothetical back-testing.Tier 1 Common regulatory capital.

        The table below providesIncluded in the range of market factor VARs, inclusive of specific risk, across the quarters ended:

 
 September 30,
2009
 June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 September 30,
2008
 
In millions of dollars Low High Low High Low High Low High 

Interest rate

 $218 $260 $193 $240 $227 $328 $239 $292 

Foreign exchange

  55  110  31  91  43  130  28  71 

Equity

  51  95  50  153  68  122  80  134 

Commodity

  32  45  26  50  12  22  12  46 
                  

        The following table provides the VAR for Citicorp's Securities and Banking businesstax provision for the second and third quartersquarter of 2009:

In millions of dollars September 30,
2009
 June 30,
2009
 

Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk

 $168 $213 
      

Average—during quarter

  184  186 

High—during quarter

  247  214 

Low—during quarter

  148  148 
      

Table2010 was a release of Contents


OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESS

        Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, systems or human factors, or from external events. It includes the reputation and franchise risk associated with business practices or market conduct$72 million in which the Company is involved. Operational risk is inherent in Citigroup's global business activities and, as with other risk types, is managed through an overall framework designed to balance strong corporate oversight with well-defined independent risk management. This framework includes:

        The goal is to keep operational risk at appropriate levels relative to the characteristics of our businesses, the markets in which we operate our capital and liquidity, and the competitive, economic and regulatory environment. Notwithstanding these controls, Citigroup incurs operational losses.

Framework

        To monitor, mitigate and control operational risk, Citigroup maintains a system of comprehensive policies and has established a consistent, value-added framework for assessing and communicating operational risk and the overall effectivenessconclusion of the internal control environment across Citigroup. An Operational Risk Council has been established to provide oversightIRS audit of Citigroup's U.S. Federal consolidated income tax returns for operational risk across Citigroup. The Council's membership includes senior members of the Chief Risk Officer's organization covering multiple dimensions of risk management with representatives of the Business and Regional Chief Risk Officers' organizations and the Business Management Group. The Council's focus is on further advancing operational risk management at Citigroup with focus on proactive identification and mitigation of operational risk and related incidents. The Council works with the business segments and the control functions to help ensure a transparent, consistent and comprehensive framework for managing operational risk globally.

        Each major business segment must implement an operational risk process consistent with the requirements of this framework. The process for operational risk management includes the following steps:

        The operational risk standards facilitate the effective communication and mitigation of operational risk both within and across businesses. As new products and business activities are developed, processes are designed, modified or sourced through alternative means and operational risks are considered. Information about the businesses' operational risk, historical losses, and the control environment is reported by each major business segment and functional area, and summarized for senior management and the Citigroup Board of Directors.

Measurement and Basel II

        To support advanced capital modeling and management, the businesses are required to capture relevant operational risk capital information. An enhanced version of the risk capital model for operational risk has been developed and implemented across the major business segments as a step toward readiness for Basel II capital calculations. The risk capital calculation is designed to qualify as an "Advanced Measurement Approach" under Basel II. It uses a combination of internal and external loss data to support statistical modeling of capital requirement estimates, which are then adjusted to reflect qualitative data regarding the operational risk and control environment.

Information Security and Continuity of Business

        Information security and the protection of confidential and sensitive customer data are a priority of Citigroup. The Company has implemented an Information Security Program that complies with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and other regulatory guidance. The Information Security Program is reviewed and enhanced periodically to address emerging threats to customers' information.

        The Corporate Office of Business Continuity, with the support of senior management, continues to coordinate global preparedness and mitigate business continuity risks by reviewing and testing recovery procedures.years 2003-2005.


Table of Contents


COUNTRY AND CROSS-BORDER RISK

        The table below shows all countries where total Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) cross-border outstandings exceed 0.75% of total Citigroup assets:

 
 September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 
In Billions of U.S. dollars 
 Cross-Border Claims on Third Parties 
 
 Banks Public Private Total Trading
and
Short-Term
Claims
 Investments
in and
Funding of
Local
Franchises
 Total
Cross-Border
Outstandings
 Commitments Total
Cross-Border
Outstandings
 Commitments 

Germany

 $9.0 $4.9 $7.2 $21.1 $19.4 $6.3 $27.4 $56.6 $29.9 $48.6 

France

  10.1  5.9  8.9  24.9  21.0  0.1  25.0  75.2  21.4  66.4 

India

  0.9  0.2  6.9  8.0  5.0  15.0  23.0  1.6  28.0  1.6 

Netherlands

  6.3  3.3  10.5  20.1  16.2    20.1  73.8  17.7  67.4 

South Korea

  2.0  0.9  5.1  8.0  7.8  11.2  19.2  14.1  22.0  15.7 

United Kingdom

  6.3  0.2  9.5  16.0  13.4    16.0  135.5  26.3  128.3 

Italy

  0.8  8.7  3.0  12.5  10.1  3.1  15.6  21.7  14.7  20.2 

Cayman Islands

  0.2    14.2  14.4  13.3    14.4  6.8  22.1  8.2 

Canada

  1.3  0.5  3.5  5.3  3.6  8.0  13.3  7.4  16.1  36.1 
                      

(1)
Included in total cross-border claims on third parties.

(2)
Commitments (not included in total cross-border outstandings) include legally binding cross-border letters of credit and other commitments and contingencies as defined by the FFIEC. Effective March 31, 2006, the FFIEC revised the definition of commitments to include commitments to local residents to be funded with local currency local liabilities.

Table of Contents


INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDSRECLASSIFICATION OF HELD-TO-MATURITY (HTM) SECURITIES TO AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE (AFS)

Average Rates—Interest Revenue, Interest Expense,        In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11,Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives. The ASU clarifies that certain embedded derivatives, such as those contained in certain securitizations, CDOs and Net Interest Margin

GRAPHIC

In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009(1)
 3rd Qtr.
2008(1)
 Change
3Q09 vs. 3Q08
 

Interest Revenue(2)

 $18,678 $19,671 $26,130  (29)%

Interest Expense(3)

  6,680  6,842  12,726  (48)
          

Net Interest Revenue(2)(3)

 $11,998 $12,829 $13,404  (10)%
          

Interest Revenue—Average Rate

 ��4.59% 4.97% 6.14% (155) bps

Interest Expense—Average Rate

  1.83% 1.93% 3.23% (140) bps

Net Interest Margin (NIM)

  2.95% 3.24% 3.15% (20) bps
          

Interest Rate Benchmarks:

             

Federal Funds Rate—End of Period

  0.00-0.25% 0.00-0.25% 2.00% (175+) bps
          

2 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate

  1.03% 1.02% 2.36% (133) bps

10 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate

  3.52% 3.32% 3.86% (34) bps
          
 

10 Year vs. 2 Year Spread

  249 bps  230 bps  150 bps    
          

(1)
Reclassifiedstructured notes, should be considered embedded credit derivatives subject to conform to the current period's presentationpotential bifurcation and to exclude discontinued operations.

(2)
Excludes taxable equivalent adjustment (based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $387 million, $82 million, and $51 million for the third quarter of 2009, the second quarter of 2009, and the third quarter of 2008, respectively.

(3)
Excludes expenses associated with hybrid financial instruments andseparate fair value accounting. The ASU allows any beneficial interest in consolidated VIEs. These obligations are classified asLong-term debt and areissued by a securitization vehicle to be accounted for at fair value with changes recorded inPrincipal transactions.

        A significant portion of the Company's business activities are based upon gathering deposits and borrowing money and then lending or investing those funds, including market-making activities in tradable securities. Net interest margin (NIM) is calculated by dividing annualized gross interest revenue less gross interest expense by average interest earning assets.

        During the third quarter of 2009, the yields across both the interest earning assets as well as the interest earning liabilities dropped significantly from the same period in 2008. The lower asset yields more than offset the lower cost of funds, resulting in lower NIM compared to the prior-year period.

        Net interest margin decreased by 29 basis points compared to the second quarter of 2009, driven by two principal items. First, the Company experienced a higher cost of borrowings due to debt issuances outside of the government programs (e.g., non-TLGP debt) as well the increased interest paid on the additional trust preferred securities outstanding as a result of the completion of the exchange offers. Second, Citi's business spread compression, generally of two types—narrowing of yields in Citi's asset businesses, due to the continued de-risking of loan portfolios and expansion of loss mitigation efforts, and the natural compression of spreads in the Company's deposit businesses as a result of the continued low interest rate environment.


Table of Contents


AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)

 
 Average Volume Interest Revenue % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 

Assets

                            

Deposits with banks(5)

 $190,269 $168,631 $65,667 $313 $377 $792  0.65% 0.90% 4.80%
                    

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $140,756 $131,522 $157,355 $476 $515 $1,272  1.34% 1.57% 3.22%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  70,790  61,382  73,631  252  279  943  1.41  1.82  5.10 
                    

Total

 $211,546 $192,904 $230,986 $728 $794 $2,215  1.37% 1.65% 3.81%
                    

Trading account assets(7)(8)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $138,781 $134,334 $210,248 $1,668 $1,785 $2,740  4.77% 5.33% 5.18%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  129,135  120,468  150,985  986  1,136  1,397  3.03  3.78  3.68 
                    

Total

 $267,916 $254,802 $361,233 $2,654 $2,921 $4,137  3.93% 4.60% 4.56%
                    

Investments(1)

                            

In U.S. offices

                            
 

Taxable

 $122,608 $123,181 $118,950 $1,568 $1,674 $1,185  5.07% 5.45% 3.96%
 

Exempt from U.S. income tax

  18,666  16,293  13,057  226  247  136  4.80  6.08  4.14 

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  121,950  118,891  92,241  1,489  1,514  1,276  4.84  5.11  5.50 
                    

Total

 $263,224 $258,365 $224,248 $3,283 $3,435 $2,597  4.95% 5.33% 4.61%
                    

Loans (net of unearned income)(9)

                            

Consumer loans

                            

In U.S. offices

 $299,069 $306,273 $329,520 $5,346 $5,410 $6,755  7.09% 7.09% 8.16%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  151,124  153,352  179,660  3,339  3,236  4,709  8.77  8.46  10.43 
                    

Total consumer loans

 $450,193 $459,625 $509,180 $8,685 $8,646 $11,464  7.65% 7.55% 8.96%
                    

Corporate loans

                            

In U.S. offices

 $71,401 $79,074 $73,976 $593 $844 $778  3.30% 4.28% 4.18%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  117,087  117,242  135,766  2,323  2,439  3,286  7.87  8.34  9.63 
                    

Total corporate loans

 $188,488 $196,316 $209,742 $2,916 $3,283 $4,064  6.14% 6.71% 7.71%
                    

Total loans

 $638,681 $655,941 $718,922 $11,601 $11,929 $15,528  7.21% 7.29% 8.59%
                    

Other interest-earning Assets

 $43,869 $57,416 $91,182 $99 $215 $861  0.90% 1.50% 3.76%
                    

Total interest-earning Assets

 $1,615,505 $1,588,059 $1,692,238 $18,678 $19,671 $26,130  4.59% 4.97% 6.14%
                       

Non-interest-earning assets(7)

  253,316  262,840  357,433                   
                    

Total Assets from discontinued operations

 $21,418 $19,048 $45,337                   
                          

Total assets

 $1,890,239 $1,869,947 $2,095,008                   
                    

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $387 million, $82 million, and $51 million for the third quarter of 2009, the second quarter of 2009, and the third quarter of 2008, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary correction in certain countries.

(6)
Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net. However, Interest revenue is reflected gross.

(7)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

(8)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of the ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(9)
Includes cash-basis loans.

Table of Contents


AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)

 
 Average Volume Interest Expense % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 

Liabilities

                            

Deposits

                            

In U.S. offices

                            
 

Savings deposits(5)

 $173,999 $173,168 $161,437 $613 $999 $611  1.40% 2.31% 1.51%
 

Other time deposits

  62,256  57,869  54,928  224  278  554  1.43  1.93  4.01 

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  459,142  428,188  464,429  1,461  1,563  3,750  1.26  1.46  3.21 
                    

Total

 $695,397 $659,225 $680,794 $2,298 $2,840 $4,915  1.31% 1.73% 2.87%
                    

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $131,641 $133,948 $160,202 $248 $288 $1,185  0.75% 0.86% 2.94%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  72,302  74,346  99,047  524  643  1,536  2.88  3.47  6.17 
                    

Total

 $203,943 $208,294 $259,249 $772 $931 $2,721  1.50% 1.79% 4.18%
                    

Trading account liabilities(8)(9)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $21,204 $19,592 $30,251 $28 $50 $251  0.52% 1.02% 3.30%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  39,431  36,652  41,816  15  19  34  0.15  0.21  0.32 
                    

Total

 $60,635 $56,244 $72,067 $43 $69 $285  0.28% 0.49% 1.57%
                    

Short-term borrowings

                            

In U.S. offices

 $108,474 $136,200 $149,398 $259 $209 $729  0.95% 0.62% 1.94%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  30,985  35,299  45,497  91  106  195  1.17  1.20  1.71 
                    

Total

 $139,459 $171,499 $194,895 $350 $315 $924  1.00% 0.74% 1.89%
                    

Long-term debt(10)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $318,610 $296,324 $323,788 $2,952 $2,427 $3,460  3.68% 3.29% 4.25%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  27,447  29,318  36,375  265  260  421  3.83  3.56  4.60 
                    

Total

 $346,057 $325,642 $360,163 $3,217 $2,687 $3,881  3.69% 3.31% 4.29%
                    

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 $1,445,491 $1,420,904 $1,567,168 $6,680 $6,842 $12,726  1.83% 1.93% 3.23%
                       

Demand deposits in U.S. offices

  34,592  19,584  7,326                   

Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8)

  250,768  267,055  351,379                   

Total liabilities from discontinued operations

  14,189  12,122  30,467                   
                          

Total liabilities

 $1,745,040 $1,719,665 $1,956,340                   
                          

Citigroup equity(11)

 $143,547 $148,448 $131,771                   
                          

Noncontrolling Interest

  1,652  1,834  6,897                   
                          

Total Equity

 $145,199 $150,282 $138,668                   
                          

Total Liabilities and Equity

 $1,890,239 $1,869,947 $2,095,008                   
                    

Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)

                            

In U.S. offices

 $947,414 $944,819 $976,773 $5,694 $6,452  6,424  2.38% 2.74% 2.62%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  668,091  643,240  715,465  6,304  6,377  6,980  3.74  3.98  3.88 
                    

Total

 $1,615,505 $1,588,059 $1,692,238 $11,998 $12,829 $13,404  2.95% 3.24% 3.15%
                    

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $387 million, $82 million, and $51 million for the third quarter of 2009, the second quarter of 2009, and the third quarter of 2008, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Savings deposits consist of Insured Money Market Rate accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The second quarter of 2009 interest expense includes the one-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million.

(6)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(7)
Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net. However, Interest revenue is reflected gross.

(8)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

(9)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of the ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(10)
Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified as long-term debt as these obligations are accounted for at fair value with changes recorded in Principal Transactions. In addition, the majority of the funding provided by Corporate Treasury to CitiCapital operations is excluded from this line.

(11)
Includes stockholders' equity from discontinued operations.

(12)
Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.

Table of Contents

AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)

 
 Average Volume Interest Revenue % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars Nine Months
2009
 Nine Months
2008
 Nine Months
2009
 Nine Months
2008
 Nine Months
2009
 Nine Months
2008
 

Assets

                   

Deposits with banks(5)

 $176,014 $63,190 $1,126 $2,329  0.86% 4.92%

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $133,427 $172,482 $1,541 $4,344  1.54% 3.36%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  61,534  76,851  866  3,407  1.88  5.92 
              

Total

 $194,961 $249,333 $2,407 $7,751  1.65% 4.15%
              

Trading account assets(7)(8)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $140,210 $235,157 $5,437 $9,623  5.18% 5.47%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  119,351  161,297  3,089  3,939  3.46  3.26 
              

Total

 $259,561 $396,454 $8,526 $13,562  4.39% 4.57%
              

Investments(1)

                   

In U.S. offices

                   
 

Taxable

 $122,563 $111,467 $4,722 $3,469  5.15% 4.16%
 

Exempt from U.S. income tax

  16,511  13,059  591  433  4.79  4.43 

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  115,930  96,486  4,581  3,930  5.28  5.44 
              

Total

 $255,004 $221,012 $9,894 $7,832  5.19% 4.73%
              

Loans (net of unearned income)(9)

                   

Consumer loans

                   

In U.S. offices

 $309,443 $343,107 $16,807 $20,913  7.26% 8.14%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  151,272  180,010  10,087  14,129  8.92  10.48 
              

Total consumer loans

 $460,715 $523,117 $26,894 $35,042  7.80% 8.95%
              

Corporate loans

                   

In U.S. offices

 $76,986 $75,177 $2,217 $2,529  3.85% 4.49%

In offices outside the U.S.(5)

  117,745  147,278  7,274  10,312  8.26  9.35 
              

Total corporate loans

 $194,731 $222,455 $9,491 $12,841  6.52% 7.71%
              

Total loans

 $655,446 $745,572 $36,385 $47,883  7.42% 8.58%
              

Other interest-earning assets

 $50,972 $100,709 $594 $3,271  1.56% 4.34%
              

Total interest-earning assets

 $1,591,958 $1,776,270 $58,932 $82,628  4.95% 6.21%
                

Non-interest-earning assets(7)

  277,243  375,399             

Total assets from discontinued operations

  20,183  53,742             
                  

Total assets

 $1,889,384 $2,205,411             
                  

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $566 million and $164 million for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary correction in certain countries.

(6)
Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net. However, Interest revenue is reflected gross.

(7)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest bearing liabilities.

(8)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilitiesof the ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assetsandTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(9)
Includes cash-basis loans.

Table of Contents

AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)

 
 Average Volume Interest Expense % Average Rate 
In millions of dollars Nine Months
2009
 Nine Months
2008
 Nine Months
2009
 Nine Months
2008
 Nine Months
2009
 Nine Months
2008
 

Liabilities

                   

Deposits

                   

In U.S. offices

                   
 

Savings deposits(5)

 $170,715 $166,799 $2,245 $2,334  1.76% 1.87%
 

Other time deposits

  60,469  59,210  918  1,946  2.03  4.39 

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  432,057  486,320  4,823  11,912  1.49  3.27 
              

Total

 $663,241 $712,329 $7,986 $16,191  1.61% 3.04%
              

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $139,282 $188,653 $852 $4,519  0.82% 3.20%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  71,611  100,437  1,955  5,040  3.65  6.70 
              

Total

 $210,893 $289,090 $2,807 $9,559  1.78% 4.42%
              

Trading account liabilities(8)(9)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $20,503 $32,576 $171 $934  1.12% 3.83%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  35,728  46,387  49  130  0.18  0.37 
              

Total

 $56,231 $78,963 $220 $1,064  0.52% 1.80%
              

Short-term borrowings

                   

In U.S. offices

 $131,116 $156,458 $835 $2,695  0.85% 2.30%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  33,833  54,438  293  538  1.16  1.32 
              

Total

 $164,949 $210,896 $1,128 $3,233  0.91% 2.05%
              

Long-term debt(10)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $308,201 $312,940 $8,199 $10,745  3.56% 4.59%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  30,274  37,885  839  1,358  3.71  4.79 
              

Total

 $338,475 $350,825 $9,038 $12,103  3.57% 4.61%
              

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 $1,433,789 $1,642,103 $21,179 $42,150  1.97% 3.43%
                

Demand deposits in U.S. offices

  23,186  7,865             

Other non-interest bearing liabilities(8)

  272,809  387,673             

Total liabilities from discontinued operations

  12,670  31,013             
                  

Total liabilities

 $1,742,454 $2,068,654             
                  

Total Citigroup equity(11)

 $145,097 $131,245             

Noncontrolling interest

  1,833  5,512             
                  

Total Equity

 $146,930 $136,757             
                  

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $1,889,384 $2,205,411             
              

Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $954,220 $1,025,789 $18,789 $19,187  2.63% 2.50%

In offices outside the U.S.(6)

  637,738  750,481  18,964  21,291  3.98  3.79 
              

Total

 $1,591,958 $1,776,270 $37,753 $40,478  3.17% 3.04%
              

(1)
Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $566 million and $164 million for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.

(2)
Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

(3)
Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

(4)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(5)
Savings deposits consist of Insured Money Market Rate accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The second quarter of 2009 interest expense includes the one-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million.

(6)
Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(7)
Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net. However, Interest revenue is reflected gross.

(8)
The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest bearing liabilities.

(9)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilitiesof the ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assetsandTrading account liabilities, respectively.

(10)
Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified as long-term debt as these obligations are accounted for at fair value with changes recorded in Principal Transactions. In addition, the majority of the funding provided by Corporate Treasury to CitiCapital is excluded from this line.

(11)
Includes stockholders' equity from discontinued operations.

(12)
Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.

Table of Contents


ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

 
 3rd Qtr. 2009 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009 3rd Qtr. 2009 vs. 3rd Qtr. 2008 
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 

Deposits with banks(4)

 $44 $(108)$(64)$611 $(1,090)$(479)
              

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

                   

In U.S. offices

 $34 $(73)$(39)$(122)$(674)$(796)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  39  (66) (27) (35) (656) (691)
              

Total

 $73 $(139)$(66)$(157)$(1,330)$(1,487)
              

Trading account assets(5)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $58 $(175)$(117)$(872)$(200)$(1,072)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  77  (227) (150) (186) (225) (411)
              

Total

 $135 $(402)$(267)$(1,058)$(425)$(1,483)
              

Investments(1)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $25 $(152)$(127)$98 $375 $473 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  38  (63) (25) 376  (163) 213 
              

Total

 $63 $(215)$(152)$474 $212 $686 
              

Loans—consumer

                   

In U.S. offices

 $(128)$64 $(64)$(591)$(818)$(1,409)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (48) 151  103  (689) (681) (1,370)
              

Total

 $(176)$215 $39 $(1,280)$(1,499)$(2,779)
              

Loans—corporate

                   

In U.S. offices

 $(76)$(175)$(251)$(26)$(159)$(185)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (3) (113) (116) (417) (546) (963)
              

Total

 $(79)$(288)$(367)$(443)$(705)$(1,148)
              

Total loans

 $(255)$(73)$(328)$(1,723)$(2,204)$(3,927)
              

Other interest-earning assets

 $(43)$(73)$(116)$(309)$(453)$(762)
              

Total interest revenue

 $17 $(1,010)$(993)$(2,162)$(5,290)$(7,452)
              

(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

Table of Contents


ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

 
 3rd Qtr. 2009 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009 3rd Qtr. 2009 vs. 3rd Qtr. 2008 
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change
 

Deposits

                   

In U.S. offices

 $28 $(468)$(440)$99 $(427)$(328)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  108  (210) (102) (42) (2,247) (2,289)
              

Total

 $136 $(678)$(542)$57 $(2,674)$(2,617)
              

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

                   

In U.S. offices

 $(5)$(35)$(40)$(181)$(756)$(937)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (17) (102) (119) (340) (672) (1,012)
              

Total

 $(22)$(137)$(159)$(521)$(1,428)$(1,949)
              

Trading account liabilities(5)

                   

In U.S. offices

 $4 $(26)$(22)$(59)$(164)$(223)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  1  (5) (4) (2) (17) (19)
              

Total

 $5 $(31)$(26)$(61)$(181)$(242)
              

Short-term borrowings

                   

In U.S. offices

 $(49)$99 $50 $(164)$(306)$(470)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (13) (2) (15) (52) (52) (104)
              

Total

 $(62)$97 $35 $(216)$(358)$(574)
              

Long-term debt

                   

In U.S. offices

 $191 $334 $525 $(55)$(453)$(508)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (17) 22  5  (93) (63) (156)
              

Total

 $174 $356 $530 $(148)$(516)$(664)
              

Total interest expense

 $231 $(393)$(162)$(889)$(5,157)$(6,046)
              

Net interest revenue

 $(214)$(617)$(831)$(1,273)$(133)$(1,406)
              

(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

Table of Contents

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE, INTEREST EXPENSE, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

 
 Nine Months 2009 vs. Nine Months 2008 
 
 Increase (Decrease)
Due to Change in:
  
 
In millions of dollars Average
Volume
 Average
Rate
 Net
Change(2)
 

Deposits at interest with banks(4)

 $1,809 $(3,012)$(1,203)
        

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

          

In U.S. offices

 $(827)$(1,976)$(2,803)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (574) (1,967) (2,541)
        

Total

 $(1,401)$(3,943)$(5,344)
        

Trading account assets(5)

          

In U.S. offices

 $(3,705)$(481)$(4,186)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (1,074) 224  (850)
        

Total

 $(4,779)$(257)$(5,036)
        

Investments(1)

          

In U.S. offices

 $491 $920 $1,411 

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  771  (120) 651 
        

Total

 $1,262 $800 $2,062 
        

Loans—consumer

          

In U.S. offices

 $(1,946)$(2,160)$(4,106)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (2,081) (1,961) (4,042)
        

Total

 $(4,027)$(4,121)$(8,148)
        

Loans—corporate

          

In U.S. offices

 $60 $(372)$(312)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (1,914) (1,124) (3,038)
        

Total

 $(1,854)$(1,496)$(3,350)
        

Total loans

 $(5,881)$(5,617)$(11,498)
        

Other interest-earning assets

 $(1,165)$(1,512)$(2,677)
        

Total interest revenue

 $(10,155)$(13,541)$(23,696)
        

Deposits

          

In U.S. offices

 $96 $(1,212)$(1,116)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (1,206) (5,883) (7,089)
        

Total

 $(1,110)$(7,095)$(8,205)
        

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

          

In U.S. offices

 $(954)$(2,713)$(3,667)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (1,192) (1,893) (3,085)
        

Total

 $(2,146)$(4,606)$(6,752)
        

Trading account liabilities(5)

          

In U.S. offices

 $(262)$(501)$(763)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (25) (56) (81)
        

Total

 $(287)$(557)$(844)
        

Short-term borrowings

          

In U.S. offices

 $(380)$(1,480)$(1,860)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (185) (60) (245)
        

Total

 $(565)$(1,540)$(2,105)
        

Long-term debt

          

In U.S. offices

 $(160)$(2,386)$(2,546)

In offices outside the U.S.(4)

  (244) (275) (519)
        

Total

 $(404)$(2,661)$(3,065)
        

Total interest expense

 $(4,512)$(16,459)$(20,971)
        

Net interest revenue

 $(5,643)$2,918 $(2,725)
        

(1)
The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

(2)
Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

(3)
Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

(4)
Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

(5)
Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of the ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

Table of Contents


CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Overview

        Generally, capital is generated by earnings from Citi's operating businesses. Primarily as a result of the exchange offers, Citigroup increased its Tier 1 Common by $63 billion from the second quarter of 2009 to $90 billion. In addition, the Company's Tangible Common Equity (TCE) increased by $62 billion from the second quarter of 2009 to $102 billion at September 30, 2009. Tier 1 Common, TCE and related ratios are used and relied on by the Company's banking regulators as a measure of capital adequacy, but are considered "non-GAAP financial measures" for SEC purposes. See "Capital Ratios," "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" and "Tangible Common Equity" below for additional information on these measures.

        The Company may also augment its capital through issuances of common stock, convertible preferred stock, preferred stock, subordinated debt underlying trust preferred securities, and equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans. Future business results of the Company, including events such as corporate dispositions, also affect the Company's capital levels. Moreover, changes that the FASB has adopted regarding off-balance sheet assets, consolidation and sale treatment will have an incremental impact on Citi's capital ratios. For more information on this, see Note 1 "Future Application of Accounting Standards" and Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, including "Funding, Liquidity Facilities and Subordinate Interests."

        Capital is used primarily to support assets in the Company's businesses and to absorb expected and unexpected market, credit or operational losses. While capital may be used for other purposes, such as to pay dividends or repurchase common stock, the Company's ability to utilize its capital for these purposes is currently restricted due to its participation in TARP and other government programs, as explained more fully in the Company's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K and its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.

        Citigroup's capital management framework is designed to ensure that Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with the Company's risk profile, all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines, and external rating agency considerations. The capital management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is reviewed at the consolidated, legal entity and country level.

        Senior management oversees the capital management process mainly through Citigroup's Finance and Asset and Liability Committee (FinALCO). The Committee is composed of the senior-most management of Citigroup for the purpose of engaging management in decision-making and related discussions on capital and liquidity matters. Among other things, the Committee's responsibilities include: determining the financial structure of Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries; ensuring that Citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized; determining appropriate asset levels and return hurdles for Citigroup and individual businesses; reviewing the funding and capital markets plan for Citigroup; and monitoring interest-rate risk, corporate and bank liquidity and the impact of currency translation on non-U.S. earnings and capital.

Capital Ratios

        Citigroup is subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by the FRB. Historically, capital adequacy has been measured, in part, based on two risk-based capital ratios, the Tier 1 and Total Capital (Tier 1 + Tier 2 Capital) ratios. Tier 1 Capital consists of core capital, while Total Capital also includes other items such as subordinated debt and allowance for credit losses. Both measures of capital adequacy are stated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets. In conjunction with the conclusion of the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), the banking regulators developed a new measure of capital called Tier 1 Common defined as Tier 1 Capital less non-common elements including qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts.

        Citigroup's risk-weighted assets are principally derived from application of the risk-based capital guidelines related to the measurement of credit risk, under which on-balance sheet assets and the credit equivalent amount of certain off-balance sheet exposures (such as financial guarantees, unfunded lending commitments, letters of credit, and derivatives) are assigned to one of several prescribed risk weight categories based upon the perceived credit risk associated with the obligor, or if relevant, the guarantor, the nature of the collateral, or external credit ratings. Risk-weighted assets also incorporate a measure for market risk on covered trading account positions, and all foreign exchange and commodity positions whether or not carried in the trading account. Excluded from risk-weighted assets are any assets, such as goodwill and deferred tax assets, to the extent required to be deducted from regulatory capital. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.

        Citigroup is also subject to a Leverage ratio requirement, a non-risk-based measure of capital adequacy, which is defined as Tier 1 Capital as a percentage of quarterly adjusted average total assets.

        To be "well capitalized" under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a bank holding company must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital ratio of at least 10%, and a Leverage Ratio of at least 3%, and not be subject to an FRB directive to maintain higher capital levels. The following table sets forth Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.


Table of Contents

Citigroup Regulatory Capital Ratios

 
 Sept. 30,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008
 

Tier 1 Common

  9.12% 2.30%

Tier 1 Capital

  12.76  11.92 

Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

  16.58  15.70 

Leverage(1)

  6.87  6.08 
      

(1)
Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average total assets.

        As noted in the table above, Citigroup was "well capitalized" under the federal bank regulatory agency definitions as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines

In millions of dollars Sept. 30,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008(1)
 

Tier 1 Common

       

Citigroup common stockholders' equity

 $140,530 $70,966 

Less: Net unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale, net of tax(2)

  (4,242) (9,647)

Less: Accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax

  (4,177) (5,189)

Less: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax(3)

  (2,619) (2,615)

Less: Cumulative effect included in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to the change in own credit worthiness, net of tax(4)

  1,862  3,391 

Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets(5)

  21,917  23,520 

Less: Intangible assets:

       
 

Goodwill(6)

  26,436  27,132 
 

Other disallowed intangible assets(6)

  10,179  10,607 

Other

  (892) (840)
      

Total Tier 1 Common

 $90,282 $22,927 
      

Qualifying perpetual preferred stock

 $312 $70,664 

Qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts

  34,403  23,899 

Qualifying noncontrolling interests

  1,288  1,268 
      

Total Tier 1 Capital

 $126,285 $118,758 
      

Tier 2 Capital

       

Allowance for credit losses(7)

 $12,701 $12,806 

Qualifying subordinated debt(8)

  24,355  24,791 

Net unrealized pretax gains on available-for- sale equity securities(2)

  753  43 
      

Total Tier 2 Capital

 $37,809 $37,640 
      

Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

 $164,094 $156,398 
      

Risk-Weighted Assets(9)

 $989,711 $996,247 
      

(1)
Reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

(2)
Tier 1 Capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, in accordance with risk-based capital guidelines. In arriving at Tier 1 Capital, banking organizations are required to deduct net unrealized losses on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax. Banking organizations are permitted to include in Tier 2 Capital up to 45% of pretax net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values.

(3)
The FRB granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting ASC 715-20-65 (SFAS 158).

(4)
The impact of including Citigroup's own credit rating in valuing liabilities for which the fair value option has beenat transition on July 1, 2010.

        The Company elected is excluded from Tierto account for beneficial interests issued by securitization vehicles, with a total fair value of $11.8 billion, under the fair value option on July 1, Capital, in accordance with risk-based capital guidelines.

(5)
Of2010. Beneficial interests previously classified as held-to-maturity (HTM) were reclassified to available-for-sale (AFS) on June 30, 2010, because as of that reporting date, the Company's approximately $38 billion of net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2009, approximately $13 billion of such assets were includable without limitation in regulatory capital pursuantCompany did not have the intent to risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $22 billion of such assets exceededhold the limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as "disallowed deferred tax assets," were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 Capital. The Company's other approximately $3 billion of net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2009 primarily represented the deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-salebeneficial interests until maturity.

        All reclassified debt securities which are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to limitation under the guidelines. The Company had approximately $24 billion of disallowed deferred tax assets at December 31, 2008.

(6)
Includes goodwill/intangible assets of related to assets of discontinued operations heldwith gross unrealized losses were assessed for sale and assets held for sale.

(7)
Includable up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Any excess allowance is deducted in arriving at risk-weighted assets.

(8)
Includes qualifying subordinated debt in an amount not exceeding 50% of Tier 1 Capital.

(9)
Includes risk-weighted credit equivalent amounts, net of applicable bilateral netting agreements, of $70.3 billion for interest rate, commodity, and equity derivative contracts, foreign-exchange contracts, and credit derivativesother-than-temporary impairment as of SeptemberJune 30, 2009, compared with $102.9 billion as2010, including an assessment of December 31, 2008. Market-risk-equivalent assets includedwhether the Company intends to sell the security. For securities that the Company intends to sell, impairment charges of $176 million (pretax) were recorded in risk-weighted assets amounted to $91.1 billion at September 30, 2009 and $101.8 billion at December 31, 2008. Risk-weighted assets also include the effect of certain other off-balance sheet exposures, such as unused lending commitments and letters of credit, and reflect deductions for certain intangible assets and any excess allowance for credit losses.

Recent Actions Impacting Citigroup's Risk-Weighted Assets

        All three of Citigroup's primary credit card securitization trusts—the Master Trust, Omni Trust and Broadway Trust—had bonds placed on ratings watch with negative implications by rating agencies during the first and second quarters of 2009. As a result of the ratings watch status, certain actions were taken by Citi with respect to each of the trusts. In general, the actions subordinated certain senior interests in the trust assets that were retained by Citi, which effectively placed these interests below investor interests in terms of priority of payment.

        With respect to the Master Trust, in the first quarter of 2009, Citi subordinated a portion of its "seller's interest," which represents a senior interest in trust receivables, thus making those cash flows available to pay investor coupons each month. In addition, during the second quarter of 2009, a subordinated note with a $3 billion principal amount was issued by the Master Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The note is classified as a held-to-maturity investment security.

        With respect to the Omni Trust,earnings in the second quarter of 2009, subordinated notes with2010.

        On July 1, 2010, the Company recorded a principal amountcumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings for reclassified beneficial interests, consisting of $2 billion were issued by the trustgross unrealized losses recognized inAccumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) of $401 million and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.gross unrealized gains recognized in orderAOCI of $355 million, for a net charge to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The notes are classified as Trading account assets. These notes are in addition to a $265 million subordinated note issued by Omni Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. in the fourth quarterRetained earnings of 2008 for the same purpose of providing additional credit support for senior noteholders.

        With respect to the Broadway Trust, in the second quarter of 2009, subordinated notes with a principal amount of $82 million were issued by the trust and retained by Citibank, N.A. in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The notes are classified as Trading account assets.

        As a result of these actions, based on the applicable regulatory capital rules, Citigroup included the sold assets of the Master and Omni Trusts (commencing with the first quarter of


Table of Contents

2009) and the Broadway Trust (commencing with the second quarter of 2009) in its risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating its risk-based capital ratios. The effect of these changes increased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by approximately $82 billion, and decreased Citigroup's Tier 1 Capital ratio by approximately 100 basis points, each as of March 31, 2009, with respect to the Master and Omni Trusts. The inclusion of the Broadway Trust increased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by an additional approximately $900 million at June 30, 2009. All bond ratings for each of the trusts have been affirmed by the rating agencies, and no downgrades have occurred as of September 30, 2009.


Common Equity
$46 million.

        Citigroup's common stockholders' equity increased by approximately $70 billion to $141 billion, and represented 7.4% of total assets as of September 30, 2009, from $71 billion and 3.7% at December 31, 2008.

        The table below summarizes the change in Citigroup's common stockholders' equity during the first nine months of 2009:

In billions of dollars  
 

Common equity, December 31, 2008

 $71.0 

Net income(1)

  6.0 

Employee benefit plans and other activities

  0.5 

Dividends

  (3.4)

Exchange offers(1)

  58.9 

Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

  7.5 
    

Common equity, September 30, 2009

 $140.5 
    

(1)
Net income includes $0.9 billion related to the conversion of trust preferred securities held by public investors into common stock as described under "Significant Events in the Third Quarter of 2009—Exchange Offers" above.

        As of September 30, 2009, $6.7 billion of stock repurchases remained under authorized repurchase programs. No material repurchases were made in 2008 and the first nine months of 2009.

Tangible Common Equity

        TCE, as defined by Citigroup, representsCommon equity lessGoodwill andIntangible assets (excluding MSRs) net of therelated net deferred tax liabilities. Other companies may calculate TCE in a manner different from Citigroup. Citi's TCE was $102.3 billion at September 30, 2009 and $31.1 billion at December 31, 2008.

        The TCE ratio (TCE divided by risk-weighted assets—see "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" above) was 10.3% at September 30, 2009 and 3.1% at December 31, 2008. A reconciliation of Citigroup's total stockholders' equity to TCE follows:

In millions of dollars, except ratio September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 

Total Citigroup Stockholders' Equity

 $140,842 $141,630 

Less:

       
 

Preferred Stock

  312  70,664 
      

Common Equity

 $140,530 $70,966 

Less:

       
 

Goodwill—as reported

  25,423  27,132 
 

Intangible Assets (other than MSRs)—as reported

  8,957  14,159 
 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets—recorded as Assets of Discontinued Operations Held for Sale

  3,856   
 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets— recorded as Assets held-for-sale

  1,377   
  

Less: Related Net Deferred Tax Liabilities

  1,381  1,382 
      

Tangible Common Equity (TCE)

 $102,298 $31,057 
      

Tangible Assets

       

GAAP Assets—as reported

 $1,888,599 $1,938,470 

Less:

       
 

Goodwill—as reported

  25,423  27,132 
 

Intangible Assets (other than MSRs)—as reported

  8,957  14,159 
 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets— recorded as Assets of Discontinued Operations Held for Sale

  3,856   
 

Goodwill and Intangible Assets— recorded as Assets held-for-sale

  1,377   
 

Related deferred tax assets

  1,272  1,285 
      

Tangible Assets (TA)

 $1,847,714 $1,895,894 
      

Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) under"Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines"

 $989,711 $996,247 
      

TCE/TA RATIO

  5.5% 1.6%
      

TCE RATIO (TCE/RWA)

  10.3% 3.1%
      

Table of Contents

Capital Resources of Citigroup's Depository Institutions

        Citigroup's U.S. subsidiary depository institutions are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the FRB's guidelines. To be "well capitalized" under these regulatory definitions, Citigroup's depository institutions must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital (Tier 1 + Tier 2 Capital) ratio of at least 10% and a Leverage ratio of at least 5%, and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels.

        At September 30, 2009, all of Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions were "well capitalized" under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, including Citigroup's primary depository institution, Citibank, N.A., as noted in the following table:

Citibank, N.A. Components of Capital and Ratios Under Regulatory Guidelines

In billions of dollars Sept. 30,
2009
 Dec. 31,
2008
 

Tier 1 Capital

 $95.8 $71.0 

Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

  110.8  108.4 
      

Tier 1 Capital Ratio

  15.16% 9.94%

Total Capital Ratio (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

  17.53  15.18 

Leverage Ratio(1)

  8.37  5.82 
      

(1)
Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average total assets.

        Citibank, N.A. had a net loss of $2.3 billion for the first nine months of 2009.

        In addition, during the first nine months of 2009, Citibank, N.A. received capital contributions from its immediate parent company, Citicorp, in the amount of $30.5 billion.

        Total subordinated notes issued to Citibank, N.A.'s immediate parent company, Citicorp, included in Citibank, N.A.'s Tier 2 Capital declined from $28.2 billion outstanding at December 31, 2008 to $6.5 billion outstanding at September 30, 2009, reflecting the redemption of $21.7 billion of subordinated notes in the first nine months of 2009.

        The significant events in the latter half of 2008 and the first nine months of 2009 impacting the capital of Citigroup also affected, or could affect, Citibank, N.A. which is subject to separate banking regulation and examination.


Table of Contents

        The following table presents the estimated sensitivity of Citigroup's and Citibank, N.A.'s capital ratios to changes of $100 million of Tier 1 or Total Capital (numerator), or changes of $1 billion in risk-weighted assets or adjusted average total assets (denominator) based on financial information as of September 30, 2009. This information is provided solely for the purpose of analyzing the impact that a change in the Company's financial position or results of operations could have on these ratios. These sensitivities only consider a single change to either a component of capital, risk-weighted assets or adjusted average total assets. Accordingly, an event that affects more than one factor may have a larger basis-point impact than is reflected in this table.


Tier 1 Common RatioTier 1 Capital RatioTotal Capital RatioLeverage Ratio

Impact of $100
million change in
Tier 1 Common
Impact of $1
billion change in
risk-weighted
assets
Impact of $100
million change in
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of $1
billion change in
risk-weighted
assets
Impact of $100
million change in
total capital
Impact of $1
billion change in
risk-weighted
assets
Impact of $100
million change in
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of $1
billion change in
adjusted average
total assets

Citigroup

1.0 bps0.9 bps1.0 bps1.3 bps1.0 bps1.7 bps0.5 bps0.4 bps

Citibank, N.A. 

1.6 bps2.4 bps1.6 bps2.8 bps0.9 bps0.7 bps

Broker-Dealer Subsidiaries

        At September 30, 2009, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc., had net capital, computed in accordance with the SEC's net capital rule, of $9.1 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement by $8.4 billion.

        In addition, certain of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to regulation in the other countries in which they do business, including requirements to maintain specified levels of net capital or its equivalent. The Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with their capital requirements at September 30, 2009. The requirements applicable to these subsidiaries in the U.S. and in particular other jurisdictions are the subject of political debate and potential change in light of recent events.

Regulatory Capital Standards Developments

        Citigroup supports the move to a new set of risk-based capital standards, published on June 26, 2004 (and subsequently amended in November 2005) by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, consisting of central banks and bank supervisors from 13 countries. The international version of the Basel II framework will allow Citigroup to leverage internal risk models used to measure credit, operational, and market risk exposures to drive regulatory capital calculations.

        On December 7, 2007, the U.S. banking regulators published the rules for large banks to comply with Basel II in the U.S. These rules require Citigroup, as a large and internationally active bank, to comply with the most advanced Basel II approaches for calculating credit and operational risk capital requirements. The U.S. implementation timetable consists of a parallel calculation period under the current regulatory capital regime (Basel I) and Basel II, starting anytime between April 1, 2008 and April 1, 2010, followed by a three-year transition period, typically starting 12 months after the beginning of parallel reporting. U.S. regulators have reserved the right to change how Basel II is applied in the U.S. following a review at the end of the second year of the transitional period, and to retain the existing prompt corrective action and leverage capital requirements applicable to banking organizations in the U.S. The Company intends to implement Basel II within the timeframe required by the final rules. The Basel II (or its successor) requirements are the subject of political debate and potential change in light of recent events.


Table of Contents


FUNDING AND LIQUIDITY

Overview

        Because Citigroup is a bank holding company, substantially all of its net earnings are generated within its operating subsidiaries. These subsidiaries make funds available to Citigroup, primarily in the form of dividends. Citigroup's liquidity management is structured to optimize the free flow of funds through the Company's legal and regulatory structure; however, various constraints, discussed below, limit certain subsidiaries' dividend-paying abilities. Consistent with these constraints, Citigroup's primary objectives for liquidity management are established by entity and in aggregate across three main operating entities, as follows: (i) Citigroup, as the parent holding company; (ii) banking subsidiaries; and (iii) non-banking subsidiaries.

Citigroup

        As a result of continued deleveraging, deposit growth, term securitization under government and non-government programs, and the issuance of long-term debt under government guarantees and non-guaranteed debt, over the last several quarters, Citigroup has substantially increased its cash balances and reduced its short-term borrowings. In addition, as of September 30, 2009, Citigroup had largely eliminated utilization of short-term government funding programs.

        Beginning in October 2008, Citi and certain of its subsidiaries participated in the FDIC's TLGP pursuant to which certain qualifying senior unsecured debt issued by such entities is guaranteed, pursuant to the applicable time period, in amounts up to 125% of the qualifying debt for each qualifying entity (see "Government Programs—FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program" above). As of September 30, 2009, Citigroup and its affiliates have issued a total of approximately $54.7 billion of long-term debt that is covered under the FDIC guarantee. Also as of September 30, 2009, Citigroup, through its subsidiaries, has issued approximately $4.37 billion in commercial paper and interbank deposits backed by the FDIC program.

        The TLGP expired on October 31, 2009 and Citigroup and its affiliates have elected not to participate in any FDIC- approved extension of the program. In anticipation of the expiration of the program, and as market conditions began to improve, Citigroup and its first tier subsidiaries have issued $20 billion of non-guaranteed debt outside of TLGP over the past six months. Such issuances have been at various maturities, with a weighted average maturity of overSee Notes 1and 10 years, in multiple currencies. In addition, beginning October 1, 2009, Citigroup has been issuing commercial paper, of any tenor, outside of the TLGP and the Company currently anticipates that commercial paper will continue to be an important funding source during 2010, although not at 2008/2009 levels.

        At September 30, 2009, long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for Citigroup, CGMHI, Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI) and other Citigroup subsidiaries, collectively, were as follows:

In billions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI(1) CFI(1) Other
Citigroup
Subsidiaries
 

Long-term debt

 $215.0 $15.4 $51.2 $98.0(2)

Commercial paper

 $ $ $10.0 $0.4 
          

(1)
Citigroup guarantees all of CFI's debt and CGMHI's publicly issued securities.

(2)
At September 30, 2009, approximately $30.6 billion relates to collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

        The table below details the long-term debt issuances of Citigroup during the past four quarters.

In billions of dollars 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09 Total 

Debt issued under TLGP guarantee

 $5.8 $21.9 $17.0 $10.0 $54.7 

Debt issued without TLGP guarantee:

                
 

Citigroup parent company/CFI

  0.3  2.0  7.4  12.6  22.3 
 

Other Citigroup subsidiaries

  0.5  0.5  10.1(1) 7.9(2) 19.0 
            

Total

 $6.6 $24.4 $34.5 $30.5 $96.0 
            

(1)
Includes $8.5 billion issued by The Student Loan Corporation through the U.S. government sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility, and $1 billion issued by Citigroup Pty. Ltd. in Australia and guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Australia.

(2)
Includes $3.3 billion issued by The Student Loan Corporation through the U.S. government sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility, and $1 billion issued by Citigroup Pty. Ltd. in Australia and guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Australia.

        See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail on Citigroup's and its affiliates' long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding.

        Outsidedetails of long-term debt funding, Citi has been actively building its structural liquidity in two important ways. First, Citi has focused on growing a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base which stood at approximately $833 billion as of September 30, 2009, up $28 billion compared to June 30, 2009. On a volume basis, deposit increases were noted in Regional Consumer Banking, particularly in North America, and in Transaction Services due to growth in all regions and strength in Treasury and Trade Solutions, excluding the impact of foreign exchange on a volume basis. Citi's deposit base has increased sequentially over each of the last five quarters. These deposits are diversified across products and regions, with approximately 61% outside of the U.S. This diversification provides the Company with an important and low-cost source of funding. A significant portion of these deposits has been, and is currently expected to be, long-term and stable and is considered to be core.

        Second, total assets as of September 30, 2009 have declined 8% as compared to September 30, 2008. Loans, which are one of the Company's most illiquid assets, are down $107 billion, or approximately 15%.


Table of Contents

        As of September 30, 2009, Citigroup and affiliates liquidity portfolio and broker-dealer "cash box" totaled $76.0 billion as compared with $66.8 billion at December 31, 2008 and $50.5 billion at September 30, 2008, and Citigroup's bank subsidiaries had an aggregate of approximately $148.8 billion of cash on deposit with major Central Banks (including the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the European Central Bank, Bank of England, Swiss National Bank and Bank of Japan), compared with approximately $72 billion at December 31, 2008. These amounts are in addition to cash deposited from the broker-dealer "cash box" noted above. Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also have significant additional liquidity resources through unencumbered highly liquid securities and other assets available for secured funding through private markets or that are, or could be, pledged to the major Central Banks and the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks. The liquidity value of the liquid securities was $59.4 billion at September 30, 2009 compared with $53.3 billion at June 30, 2009. Significant amounts of cash and liquid securities are also available in other Citigroup entities.

        As a result of the actions described above and the Company's current funding levels, management currently believes Citi is largely pre-funded heading into 2010, with a deliberately liquid and flexible balance sheet. The combined parent and broker-dealer entities maintain sufficient liquidity to meet all maturing unsecured debt obligations due within a one-year time horizon, without accessing the unsecured markets.

Banking Subsidiaries—Constraints on Dividends

        There are various legal limitations on the ability of Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions to extend credit, pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to Citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries. Currently, the approval of the OCC, in the case of national banks, or the Office of Thrift Supervision, in the case of federal savings banks, is required if total dividends declared in any calendar year exceed amounts specified by the applicable agency's regulations. State-chartered depository institutions are subject to dividend limitations imposed by applicable state law.

        In determining the declaration of dividends, each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements, as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Citigroup did not receive any dividends from its banking subsidiaries during the third quarter of 2009.

Non-Banking Subsidiaries—Constraints on Dividends

        Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries, including Citigroup Global Market Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), are generally not subject to regulatory restrictions on dividends. However, the ability of CGMHI to declare dividends can be restricted by capital considerations of its broker-dealer subsidiaries.

        CGMHI's consolidated balance sheet is liquid, with the vast majority of its assets consisting of marketable securities and collateralized short-term financing agreements arising from securities transactions. CGMHI monitors and evaluates the adequacy of its capital and borrowing base on a daily basis to maintain liquidity and to ensure that its capital base supports the regulatory capital requirements of its subsidiaries.

        Some of Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries, including CGMHI, have credit facilities with Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions, including Citibank, N.A. Borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. There are various legal restrictions on the extent to which a bank holding company and certain of its non-bank subsidiaries can borrow or obtain credit from Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions or engage in certain other transactions with them. In general, these restrictions require that transactions be on arm's-length terms and be secured by designated amounts of specified collateral. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


®Table of Contents

Credit Ratings

        Citigroup's ability to access the capital markets and other sources of funds, as well as the cost of these funds and its ability to maintain certain deposits, is highly dependent on its credit ratings. The table below indicates the current ratings for Citigroup. Generally, since May of 2009, Citigroup's ratings have largely been consistent and stable.

        As a result of the Citigroup guarantee, changes in ratings and ratings outlooks for CFI are the same as those of Citigroup noted above.

Citigroup's Debt Ratings as of September 30, 2009


Citigroup Inc.Citigroup Funding Inc.Citibank, N.A.

Senior
debt
Commercial
paper
Senior
debt
Commercial
paper
Long-
term
Short-
term

Fitch Ratings

A+F1+A+F1+A+F1+

Moody's Investors Service

A3P-1A3P-1A1P-1

Standard & Poor's

AA-1AA-1A+A-1

        Ratings downgrades by Fitch Ratings, Moody's Investors Service or Standard & Poor's have had and could continue to have impacts on funding and liquidity, and could also have further explicit impact on liquidity due to collateral triggers and other cash requirements. Because of the current credit ratings of Citigroup Inc., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating would likely impact Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating. As of September 30, 2009, a one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc., accompanied by a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating, would result in an approximately $15.9 billion funding requirement in the form of collateral and cash obligations. Further, as of September 30, 2009, a one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term ratings of Citibank, N.A. would result in an approximately $4.4 billion funding requirement in the form of collateral and cash obligations. Because of the current credit ratings of Citibank, N.A., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating is unlikely to have any impact on its commercial paper/short-term rating.

        As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 166 and SFAS 167 (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), certain credit rating agencies have raised concerns about the loss of GAAP sale treatment in certain securitization transactions and the resulting effects under the FDIC's securitization rule. Specifically, under the FDIC's securitization rule, so long as a securitization is accounted for as a sale for GAAP purposes and certain other conditions are satisfied, the FDIC, when acting as conservator or receiver of an insolvent bank, will also treat the transferred assets as sold and thus surrender its rights to reclaim the financial assets transferred in the securitization. With the adoption of SFAS 166 and SFAS 167, GAAP sales treatment will be eliminated in certain securitizations, thus potentially putting securitized assets at risk of seizure by the FDIC in cases of conservatorship or receivership.

        The FDIC is considering a revision to its current regulations that would continue to recognize the legal isolation of securitized assets after the adoption of SFAS 166 and SFAS 167; however, it is unclear at this time what changes to the rules, if any, will be made or if the affected securitization structures will need to be modified in order to comply with those rules. If the FDIC does not act and/or if the affected securitization vehicles are unable to take appropriate steps to restructure their programs, the bond ratings of certain notes issued by these securitization vehicles, including Citi's credit card securitization vehicles, could be lowered or withdrawn. In addition, these securitization vehicles may be unable to issue new bonds with a rating that is higher than the sponsoring bank's then-current rating.


Table of Contentsreclassification.


OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

        Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs), primarily in connection with securitization activities in Regional Consumer Banking and Local Consumer Lending. Citigroup and its subsidiaries use SPEs principally to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroup's financial assets, assisting clients in securitizing their financial assets and creating investment products for clients. For further information about the Company's securitization activities and involvement in SPEs, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        The following tables describe certain characteristics of assets owned by certain identified significant unconsolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) as of September 30, 2009. These VIEs and the Company's exposure to the VIEs are described in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        See also Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Elimination of QSPEs and Changes in the Consolidation Model for Variable Interest Entities."

 
  
  
 Credit rating distribution 
Citi-Administered Asset-Backed
Commercial Paper Conduits
 Total
assets
(in billions)
 Weighted
average
life
 AAA AA A BBB/BBB+
and below
 

 $39.7 4.55 years  41% 44% 11% 4%
              


Asset class% of total
portfolio

Student loans

31%

Trade receivables

9%

Credit cards and consumer loans

4%

Portfolio finance

11%

Commercial loans and corporate credit

17%

Export finance

19%

Auto

5%

Residential mortgage

4%

Total

100%


 
  
  
 Credit rating distribution 
Collateralized Debt and Loan
Obligations
 Total
assets
(in billions)
 Weighted
average
life
 A or higher BBB BB/B CCC Unrated 

Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

 $16.1 3.9 years  12% 12% 12% 49% 15%
                

Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

 $13.8 6.6 years  1% 1% 45% 8% 45%
                


 
 Credit rating distribution 
Municipal Securities Tender Option
Bond Trusts (TOB)
 Total
assets
(in billions)
 Weighted
average
life
 AAA/Aaa AA/Aa1 –
AA-/Aa3
 Less than
AA-/Aa3
 

Customer TOB trusts (not consolidated)

 $8.5 12.4 years  12% 85% 3%

Proprietary TOB trusts (consolidated and non-consolidated)

 $13.0 16.3 years  8% 77% 15%

QSPE TOB trusts (not consolidated)

 $0.7 10.9 years  88% 12% 0%
            

Table of Contents


CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

        See the Company's 2008Citi's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, and Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements herein,in this Form 10-Q , for a discussion of contractual obligations.


FAIR VALUATION

        For a discussion of fair value of assets and liabilities, see Note 17 and Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure

        Citigroup's disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, including without limitation that information required to be disclosed by Citi in its SEC filings is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

        Citigroup's Disclosure Committee assists the CEO and CFO in their responsibilities to design, establish, maintain and evaluate the effectiveness of Citi's disclosure controls and procedures. The Company'sDisclosure Committee is responsible for, among other things, the oversight, maintenance and implementation of the disclosure controls and procedures, subject to the supervision and oversight of the CEO and CFO.

        Citigroup's management, with the participation of the Company'scompany's CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company'sCitigroup's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and, based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that at that date the Company'sCitigroup's disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Financial Reporting

        There were no changes in the Company'sCitigroup's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company'sCiti's internal control over financial reporting.


Table of Contents


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        Certain statements in this Form 10-Q, including but not limited to statements included within the "Management'sManagement's Discussion and Analysis" of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are "forward-looking statements"forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Generally, "forward-looking statements"forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but instead represent only the Company'sCitigroup's and management's beliefs regarding future events. Such statements may be identified by words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "maybelieve, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, may increase," "may may fluctuate", and similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as "will," "should," "would"will, should, would and "could."could.

        Such statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors, including but not limited to those described below:

A decrease in trading derivatives of $3.1 billion includeswas driven by net realized and unrealized losses of $4.8$2.4 billion recorded inPrincipal transactions, mainly on complex derivative contracts such as those linked to credit and equity exposures. These losses are partially offset by gains recognized on instruments that have been classified in Levels 1 and 2.

Transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the Fair Value Hierarchy

        The following is a discussionCompany did not have any significant transfers of assets or liabilities between Levels 1 and 2 of the changes to the Level 3 balances for each of the rollforward tables presented above.


Table of Contents

certificates issued by the U.S credit card securitization trust and retained by the Company were transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 during the thirdsecond quarter of 2008.2010.

      The reduction in securities sold under agreement to repurchase of $3.3 billion, was primarily driven by the transfer of positions from Level 3 to Level 2 as valuation methodology inputs considered to be unobservable were determined to be insignificant to the overall valuation.

      The decrease in short-term borrowings of $3.1 billion, which was primarily due to net transfers out of $1.8 billion as valuation methodology inputs considered to be unobservable were determined to be insignificant to the overall valuation, and payments of $1.2 billion against the short-term debt obligations.

      The increase in long-term debt of $24.9 billion was driven by the transfer of consolidated SIV liabilities to Level 3 due to the lack of observable inputs, offset by the payments made against this debt in the second and third quarters of 2008.

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

        Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurringnon-recurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above.

        These include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during thethese periods as a result of an impairment. In addition, these assets such asinclude loans held for saleheld-for-sale (HFS) that are measured at the lower of cost or market (LOCOM), that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period.

        The fair value of loans measured on a LOCOM basis is determined where possible using quoted secondary-market prices. Such loans are generally classified inas Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy given the level of activity in the market and the frequency of available quotes. If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan.

        The following table presents all loans held-for-saleHFS that are carried at LOCOM as of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 20082009 (in billions):

 
 Aggregate
Cost
 Fair
Value
 Level 2 Level 3 

September 30, 2009

 $2.8 $1.6 $0.5 $1.1 

December 31, 2008

  3.1  2.1  0.8  1.3 
          
 
 Aggregate
cost
 Fair value Level 2 Level 3 

June 30, 2010

 $1.5 $1.4 $0.4 $1.0 
          

December 31, 2009

 $2.5 $1.6 $0.3 $1.3 
          

Table of Contents


18.    FAIR-VALUE17.    FAIR VALUE ELECTIONS

        The Company may elect to report most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in earnings. After the initial adoption, theThe election is made upon the acquisition of an eligible financial asset, financial liability or firm commitment or when certain specified reconsideration events occur. The fair-value election may not be revoked once an election is made.

        Additionally, the transition provisions of ASC 825-10 (SFAS 159) permit a one-time election for existing positions at the adoption date with a cumulative-effect adjustment included in opening retained earnings and future changes in fair value reported in earnings.

        The Company also has elected to adopt the fair-value accounting provisions for certain assets and liabilities prospectively. Hybrid financial instruments, such as structured notes containing embedded derivatives that otherwise would require bifurcation, as well as certain interest-only instruments, may be accounted for at fair value if the Company makes an irrevocable election to do so on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The changes in fair value are recorded in current earnings. Additional discussion regarding the applicable areas in which fair value elections were made is presented in Note 1716 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        All servicing rights must now be recognized initially at fair value. At its initial adoption, the standard permits a one-time irrevocable election to re-measure each class of servicing rights at fair value, with the changes in fair value recorded in current earnings. The classes of servicing rights are identified based on the availability of market inputs used in determining their fair values and the methods for managing their risks. The Company has elected fair-value accounting for its mortgage and student loan classes of servicing rights. The impact of adopting this standard was not material. See Note 1514 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of mortgage servicing rights.


Table of ContentsMSRs.

        The following table presents, as of SeptemberJune 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of those positions selected for fair-value accounting, as well as the changes in fair value for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and September 30, 2008.2009:

 
 Fair Value at Changes in fair value gains
(losses) for nine months ended
September 30,
 
In millions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 2009 2008(1) 

Assets

             

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

             
 

Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed(2)

 $87,886 $70,305 $(1,284)$675 
          

Trading account assets:

             

Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities originally classified as available-for-sale

 $ $ $ $(13)
 

Selected letters of credit hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

  28    61  (2)
 

Certain credit products

  16,695  16,254  5,461  (1,143)
 

Certain hybrid financial instruments

  6  33    3 
 

Retained interests from asset securitizations

  2,153  3,026  1,522  (521)
          

Total trading account assets

 $18,882 $19,313 $7,044 $(1,676)
          

Investments:

             
 

Certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures

 $359 $469 $(52)$(54)
 

Other

  237  295  (83) (60)
          

Total investments

 $596 $764 $(135)$(114)
          

Loans:

             
 

Certain credit products

 $997 $2,315 $26 $(54)
 

Certain mortgage loans

  30  36  (2) (22)
 

Certain hybrid financial instruments

  478  381  54  5 
          

Total loans

 $1,505 $2,732 $78 $(71)
          

Other assets:

             
 

Mortgage servicing rights

 $6,228 $5,657 $996 $568 
 

Certain mortgage loans

  2,857  4,273  81  21 
 

Certain equity method investments

  769  936  174  (154)
          

Total other assets

 $9,854 $10,866 $1,251 $435 
          

Total

 $118,723 $103,980 $6,954 $(751)
          

Liabilities

             

Interest-bearing deposits:

             
 

Certain structured liabilities

 $234 $320 $ $ 
 

Certain hybrid financial instruments

  1,795  2,286  (562) 557 
          

Total interest-bearing deposits

 $2,029 $2,606 $(562)$557 
          

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

             
 

Selected portfolios of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned(2)

 $116,693 $138,866 $213 $(44)
          

Trading account liabilities:

             
 

Selected letters of credit hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

 $ $72 $37 $ 
 

Certain hybrid financial instruments

  5,980  4,679  (1,798) 2,618 
          

Total trading account liabilities

 $5,980 $4,751 $(1,761)$2,618 
          

Short-term borrowings:

             
 

Certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings

 $188 $2,303 $50 $45 
 

Certain hybrid financial instruments

  523  2,112  (84) 176 
 

Certain structured liabilities

  3  3    10 
 

Certain non-structured liabilities

  729  13,189  (33)  
          

Total short-term borrowings

 $1,443 $17,607 $(67)$231 
          

Long-term debt:

             
 

Certain structured liabilities

 $3,395 $3,083 $(64)$446 
 

Certain non-structured liabilities

  7,510  7,189  (102) 3,441 
 

Certain hybrid financial instruments

  16,281  16,991  (1,572) 2,335 
          

Total long-term debt

 $27,186 $27,263 $(1,738)$6,222 
          

Total

 $153,331 $191,093 $(3,915)$9,584 
          
 
 Fair value at Changes in fair value gains
(losses) for the six months ended
June 30,
 
In millions of dollars June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009(1)
 2010 2009(1) 

Assets

             

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed(2)

 $98,099 $87,837 $528 $(1,256)
          

Trading account assets

 $13,329 $16,725 $17 $5,278 
          

Investments

 $437 $574 $(9)$(129)
          

Loans

             
 

Certain corporate loans(3)

 $2,358 $1,405 $(137)$42 
 

Certain consumer loans(3)

  2,620  34  70  (4)
          

Total loans

 $4,978 $1,439 $(67)$38 
          

Other assets

             
 

MSRs

 $4,894 $6,530 $(1,198)$1,440 
 

Certain mortgage loans (HFS)

  3,834  3,338  147  27 
 

Certain equity method investments

  657  598  (31) 94 
          

Total other assets

 $9,385 $10,466 $(1,082)$1,561 
          

Total assets

 $126,228 $117,041 $(613)$5,492 
          

Liabilities

             

Interest-bearing deposits

 $1,387 $1,545 $2 $21 
          

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

             
 

Selected portfolios of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned(2)

 $119,282 $104,030 $91 $215 
          

Trading account liabilities

 $4,200 $5,325 $145 $(735)
          

Short-term borrowings

 $1,650 $639 $57 $22 
          

Long-term debt

 $25,858 $25,942 $(3)$(40)
          

Total

 $152,377 $137,481 $292 $(517)
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to current period's presentation.

(2)
Reflects netting of the amounts due from securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

(3)
Includes mortgage loans held by mortgage loan securitization VIEs consolidated upon the adoption of SFAS 166/167 on January 1, 2010.

Table of Contents

Own-Credit Own Credit Valuation Adjustment

        The fair value of debt liabilities for which the fair-valuefair value option wasis elected (other than non-recourse and similar liabilities) wasis impacted by the narrowing or widening of the Company's credit spread.spreads. The estimated change in the fair value of these debt liabilities due to such changes in the Company's own credit risk (or instrument-specific credit risk) was a loss of $1.019 billion$455 million gain and a gain of $1.525$1.608 billion loss for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and September 30, 2008, respectively,a gain of $450 million and a loss of $2.447 billion and a gain of $2.577$1.429 billion for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and September 30, 2008,2009, respectively. Changes in fair value resulting from changes in instrument-specific credit risk were estimated by incorporating the Company's current observable credit spreads into the relevant valuation technique used to value each liability as described above.

        During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company changed the source of its credit spreads from those observed in the credit default swap market to those observed in the bond market. Had this modification been in place since the beginning of 2008, the change in the Company's own credit spread would have resulted in a gain of $2.48 billion and a gain of $3.53 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.

The Fair-ValueFair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities

        The Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities (Legg shares) were acquired in connection with the sale of Citigroup's Asset Management business in December 2005. Prior to the election of fair-value option accounting, the shares were classified as available-for-sale securities with the unrealized loss of $232 million as of December 31, 2006 included inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss). This unrealized loss was recorded upon election of a fair value as a reduction of January 1, 2007Retained earnings as part of the cumulative-effect adjustment.

        During the first quarter of 2008, the Company sold the remaining 8.4 million Legg shares at a pretax loss of $10.3 million ($6.7 million after-tax).

Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings

        The Company elected the fair-valuefair value option retrospectively for our United States and United Kingdomcertain portfolios of fixed-income securities purchased under agreements to resell and fixed-income securities sold under agreements to repurchase (and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings). The fair-value option was also elected prospectively on broker-dealer entities in the second quarter of 2007 for certain portfolios of fixed-income securities lendingUnited States, United Kingdom and borrowing transactions based in Japan. In each case, the election was made because the related interest-rate risk is managed on a portfolio basis, primarily with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. Previously, these positions were accounted for on an accrual basis.

        Changes in fair value for transactions in these portfolios are recorded inPrincipal transactions. The related interest revenue and interest expense are measured based on the contractual rates specified in the transactions and are reported as interest revenue and expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

        The Company has elected the fair-valuefair value option for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-valuefair value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-valuefair value basis and to mitigatemitigates accounting mismatches.

        The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.8 billion as of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2008.2009. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008.2009.

        These items have been classified inTrading account assets orTrading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of these items are classified inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

Certain loans and other credit products

        Citigroup has elected the fair-valuefair value option for certain originated and purchased loans, including certain unfunded loan products, such as guarantees and letters of credit, executed by Citigroup's trading businesses. None of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment. Significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term, or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the Company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party. Citigroup has elected the fair-valuefair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. Fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the Company, including where those management objectives would not be met.


Table of Contents

        The following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value:value at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

 
 September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008(1) 
In millions of dollars Trading
assets
 Loans Trading
assets
 Loans 

Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

 $16,695 $997 $16,254 $2,315 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

 $1,016 $(38)$6,501 $3 

Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

 $794 $ $77 $ 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

 $461 $ $190 $ 
          

(1)
Reclassified to conform to current period's presentation.
 
 June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
In millions of dollars Trading
assets
 Loans Trading
assets
 Loans 

Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

 $13,299 $1,258 $14,338 $945 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

  697  (62) 390  (44)

Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

  220    312   

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

  270    267   
          

        In addition to the amounts reported above, $200$416 million and $72$200 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-valuefair value accounting werewas outstanding as of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively.

        Changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported asInterest revenue on tradingTrading account assets or loansloan interest depending on theirthe balance sheet classifications.classifications of the credit products. The changes in fair value for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and 20082009 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a gain of $27 million and a loss of $32 million and $32$48 million, respectively.

Certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments

        Citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation. The Company has elected the fair-valuefair value option for certain of these ventures, because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in ourCiti's investment companies, which are reported at fair value. The fair-valuefair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments. All investments (debt and equity) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value. These investments are classified asInvestments on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

        Citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for underwhich the equity method. The Company elected fair-valuefair value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity. Since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value, the impact of applying the equity method to Citigroup's investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-valuefair value accounting. Thus, this fair-value election had no impact on openingRetained earnings. These investments are classified asOther assets on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

        Changes in the fair values of these investments are classified inOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

Certain structured liabilities

        The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation or currency risks ("structured liabilities"). The Company elected the fair-value option, because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair-value basis. These positions will continue to be classified as debt, deposits or derivatives (Trading account liabilities) on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form.

        For those structured liabilities classified asLong-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $208 million and $671 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

        The change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

        Related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Income Statement.

Certain non-structured liabilities

        The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ("non-structured liabilities"). The Company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings. The election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications. These positions are reported inShort-term borrowings andLong-term debt on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

        For those non-structured liabilities classified asShort-term borrowings for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $41 million and $220 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

        For non-structured liabilities classified asLong-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $637 million and $856 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

        Related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Income Statement.


Table of Contents

Certain mortgage loans (HFS)

        Citigroup has elected the fair-valuefair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for-sale.HFS. These loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments. The Company has elected the fair-valuefair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. The fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment, as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments. This election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after September 1, 2007.


        The following table provides information about certain mortgage loans HFS carried at fair value:value at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

In millions of dollars September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
  June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 

Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

 $2,857 $4,273  $3,834 $3,338 

Aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance

 $87 $138  172 55 

Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

 $8 $9  2 4 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

 $6 $2   3 
          

        The changes in fair values of these mortgage loans isare reported inOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. The changes in fair value during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and September 30, 20082009 due to instrument-specific credit risk resulted in a $6$3 million loss and $6$10 million loss, respectively. Related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Items selected for fair-value accounting

Certain hybrid financial instrumentsConsolidated VIEs

        The Company has elected to apply fair-value accountingthe fair value option for certain hybrid financialall qualified assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate, foreign exchange or inflation (e.g., equity, credit or commodity risks). In addition,of certain VIEs that were consolidated upon the adoption of SFAS 166/167 on January 1, 2010, including certain private label mortgage securitizations, mutual fund deferred sales commissions and collateralized loan obligation VIEs. The Company elected the fair value option for these VIEs as the Company has elected fair-value accountingbelieves this method better reflects the economic risks, since substantially all of the Company's retained interests in these entities are carried at fair value.

        With respect to the consolidated mortgage VIEs, the Company determined the fair value for residual interests retainedthe mortgage loans and long-term debt utilizing internal valuation techniques. The fair value of the long-term debt measured using internal valuation techniques is verified, where possible, to prices obtained from securitizing certain financial assets.

independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources and may apply matrix pricing for similar securities when no price is observable. Security pricing associated with long-term debt that is verified is classified as Level 2 and non-verified debt is classified as Level 3. The Company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair-value basis. In addition, the accounting for these instrumentsfair value of mortgage loans of each VIE is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivativesderived from the host contracts and accounting for each separately. The hybrid financial instrumentssecurity pricing. When substantially all of the long-term debt of a VIE is valued using Level 2 inputs, the corresponding mortgage loans are classified asTrading account assets, Loans,Deposits,Trading account liabilities (for prepaid derivatives),Short-term borrowings orLong-Term Debt on Level 2. Otherwise, the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form, while residual interests in certain securitizationsmortgage loans of a VIE are classified asTrading account assets. Level 3.

        For hybrid financial instrumentsWith respect to the consolidated mortgage VIEs for which fair-value accounting has been elected and that are classified asLong-term debt, the aggregate unpaid principal exceeded the aggregate fair value by $2.4 billion and $4.1 billion as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The difference for those instrumentsoption was elected, the mortgage loans are classified asLoans is immaterial.

        Changeson Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments, which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest,of the loans are recorded inreported asPrincipal transactionsOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately fromRelated interest revenue is measured based on the change in fair valuecontractual interest rates and reported asInterest revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Information about these mortgage loans is included in the table below. The change in fair value of these loans due to instrument-specific credit risk was a loss of $180 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.


Table        The debt issued by these consolidated VIEs is classified as long-term debt on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The changes in fair value for the majority of Contentsthese liabilities are reported inOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income. The aggregate unpaid principal balance of long-term debt of these consolidated VIEs exceeded the aggregate fair value by $1.6 billion as of June 30, 2010.

        The following table provides information about corporate and consumer loans of consolidated VIEs carried at fair value:

 
 June 30, 2010 
In millions of dollars Corporate
Loans
 Consumer
Loans
 

Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

 $680 $2,590 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

  495  973 

Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

  95  269 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

  148  261 
      

Mortgage servicing rights

        The Company accounts for mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) at fair value. Fair value for MSRs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates. The model assumptions used in the valuation of MSRs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates. The fair value of MSRs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. In managing this risk, the Company hedges a significant portion of the values of its MSRs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts, forward-purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and purchased securities classified as trading. See Note 15Note14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of MSRs.

        These MSRs, which totaled $6.2$4.894 billion and $5.7$6.530 billion as of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively, are classified asMortgage servicing rights on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of MSRs are recorded inCommissions and feesOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.


Certain structured liabilities

        The Company has elected the fair value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation, currency, equity, referenced credit or commodity risks (structured liabilities). The Company elected the fair value option, because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair value basis. These positions will continue to be classified as debt, deposits or derivatives (Trading account liabilities) on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form.

        The change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Changes in fair value for structured debt with embedded equity, referenced credit or commodity underlyings includes an economic component for accrued interest. For structured debt that contains embedded interest rate, inflation or currency risks, related interest expense is measured based on the contracted interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Certain non-structured liabilities

        The Company has elected the fair value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates (non-structured liabilities). The Company has elected the fair value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings. The election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications. These positions are reported inShort-term borrowings andLong-term debt on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

        Related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

        The following table provides information about long-term debt, excluding the debt issued by the consolidated VIEs, carried at fair value at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

In millions of dollars June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 

Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

 $20,440 $25,942 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

  2,815  3,399 

        The following table provides information about short-term borrowings carried at fair value:

In millions of dollars June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 

Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

 $1,650 $639 

Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

  155  53 

Table of Contents


19.18.   FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments

        The table below presents the carrying value and fair value of Citigroup's financial instruments. The disclosure excludes leases, affiliate investments, pension and benefit obligations and insurance policy claim reserves. In addition, contract-holder fund amounts exclude certain insurance contracts. Also as required, the disclosure excludes the effect of taxes, any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the entire holdings of a particular instrument, excess fair value associated with deposits with no fixed maturity and other expenses that would be incurred in a market transaction. In addition, the table excludes the values of non-financial assets and liabilities, as well as a wide range of franchise, relationship and intangible values (but includes mortgage servicing rights), which are integral to a full assessment of Citigroup's financial position and the value of its net assets.

        The fair value represents management's best estimates based on a range of methodologies and assumptions. The carrying value of short-term financial instruments not accounted for at fair value, as well as receivables and payables arising in the ordinary course of business, approximates fair value because of the relatively short period of time between their origination and expected realization. Quoted market prices are used when available for investments and for both trading and end-user derivatives, as well as for liabilities, such as long-term debt, with quoted prices. For performing loans not accounted for at fair value, contractual cash flows are discounted at quoted secondary market rates or estimated market rates if available. Otherwise, sales of comparable loan portfolios or current market origination rates for loans with similar terms and risk characteristics are used. For loans with doubt as to collectability, expected cash flows are discounted using an appropriate rate considering the time of collection and the premium for the uncertainty of the cash flows. This method of estimating fair value does not incorporate the exit-price concept of fair value prescribed by ASC 820-10 (SFAS No. 157). The value of collateral is also considered. For liabilities such as long-term debt not accounted for at fair value and without quoted market prices, market borrowing rates of interest are used to discount contractual cash flows.


 September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008  June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
In billions of dollars Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
 Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
  Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
 Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
 

Assets

  

Investments

 $261.9 $261.7 $256.0 $251.9  $317.1 $317.6 $306.1 $307.6 

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

 197.4 197.4 184.1 184.1  230.8 230.8 222.0 222.0 

Trading account assets

 340.7 340.7 377.6 377.6  309.4 309.4 342.8 342.8 

Loans(1)

 582.7 573.6 660.9 642.7  643.5 632.5 552.5 542.8 

Other financial assets(2)

 344.9 344.7 316.6 316.6  286.6 286.6 290.9 290.9 
                  

 


 September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008  June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
In billions of dollars Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
 Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
  Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
 Carrying
value
 Estimated
fair value
 

Liabilities

  

Deposits

 $832.6 $832.3 $774.2 $772.9  $814.0 $812.2 $835.9 $834.5 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

 178.2 178.2 205.3 205.3  196.1 196.1 154.3 154.3 

Trading account liabilities

 130.5 130.5 165.8 165.8  131.0 131.0 137.5 137.5 

Long-term debt

 379.6 374.9 359.6 317.1  413.3 408.8 364.0 354.8 

Other financial liabilities(3)

 171.7 171.7 255.6 255.6  192.6 192.6 175.8 175.8 
                  

(1)
The carrying value of loans is net of theAllowance for loan losses of $36.4$46.2 billion and $36.0 billion for SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and $29.6 billion for December 31, 2008.2009, respectively. In addition, the carrying values exclude $3.1$2.5 billion and $3.7$2.9 billion of lease finance receivables at SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively.

(2)
Includes cash and due from banks, deposits with banks, brokerage receivables, reinsurance recoverable, mortgage servicing rights,MSRs, separate and variable accounts and other financial instruments included inOther assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for all of which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

(3)
Includes brokerage payables, separate and variable accounts, short-term borrowings and other financial instruments included inOther Liabilitiesliabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for all of which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

        Fair values vary from period to period based on changes in a wide range of factors, including interest rates, credit quality, and market perceptions of value and as existing assets and liabilities run off and new transactions are entered into.

        The estimated fair values of loans reflect changes in credit status since the loans were made, changes in interest rates in the case of fixed-rate loans, and premium values at origination of certain loans. The carrying values (reduced by theAllowance for loan losses) exceeded the estimated fair values of Citigroup's loans, in aggregate, by $9.1$11.0 billion and $18.2$9.7 billion at SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively. At SeptemberJune 30, 2009,2010, the carrying values, net of allowances, exceeded the estimated fair values by $7$9.1 billion and $2$1.9 billion for consumer loans and corporate loans, respectively.

        Citigroup has determined that it isThe estimated fair values of the Company's corporate unfunded lending commitments at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $5.4 billion and $5.0 billion, respectively. The Company does not practicable to estimate the fair value on an ongoing basisvalues of consumer unfunded lending commitments, which are generally cancellable by providing notice to the loss sharing program with the United States Government because the program is a unique contract tailored to fit the specific portfolio of assets held by Citigroup, contains various public policy and other non-financial elements, and provides a significant Tier 1 Capital benefit.borrower.


Table of Contents


20.19.   GUARANTEES

        The Company provides a variety of guarantees and indemnifications to Citigroup customers to enhance their credit standing and enable them to complete a wide variety of business transactions. For certain contracts meeting the definition of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize, at inception, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee.

        In addition, the guarantor must disclose the maximum potential amount of future payments the guarantor could be required to make under the guarantee, if there were a total default by the guaranteed parties. The determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. Such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.

        The following tables present information about the Company's guarantees at SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:


 Maximum potential amount of future payments  
  Maximum potential amount of future payments 
In billions of dollars at September 30,
except carrying value in millions
 Expire within
1 year
 Expire after
1 year
 Total amount
outstanding
 Carrying value
(in millions)
 

2009

 
In billions of dollars at June 30,
except carrying value in millions
 Expire within
1 year
 Expire after
1 year
 Total amount
outstanding
 Carrying value
(in millions)
 

2010

 

Financial standby letters of credit

 $48.8 $48.2 $97.0 $465.7  $35.8 $49.0 $84.8 $280.6 

Performance guarantees

 9.1 5.4 14.5 32.5  8.6 4.3 12.9 27.5 

Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees

 6.8 9.6 16.4 855.2  3.0 4.3 7.3 954.9 

Loans sold with recourse

  0.3 0.3 65.6   0.3 0.3 75.0 

Securities lending indemnifications(1)

 66.1  66.1   68.9  68.9  

Credit card merchant processing(1)

 59.4  59.4   61.1  61.1  

Custody indemnifications and other

  27.5 27.5 154.6   35.2 35.2 275.7 
                  

Total

 $190.2 $91.0 $281.2 $1,573.6  $177.4 $93.1 $270.5 $1,613.7 
                  



(1)
The carrying values of guarantees of collections of contractual cash flows, securities lending indemnifications and credit card merchant processing are not material, as the Company has determined that the amount and probability of potential liabilities arising from these guarantees are not significant.


 Maximum potential amount of future payments  
  Maximum potential amount of future payments 
In billions of dollars at December 31,
except carrying value in millions
 Expire within
1 year
 Expire after
1 year
 Total amount
outstanding
 Carrying value
(in millions)
  Expire within
1 year
 Expire after
1 year
 Total amount
outstanding
 Carrying value
(in millions)
 

2008

 

2009

 

Financial standby letters of credit

 $31.6 $62.6 $94.2 $289.0  $41.4 $48.0 $89.4 $438.8 

Performance guarantees

 9.4 6.9 16.3 23.6  9.4 4.5 13.9 32.4 

Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees(2)

 7.6 7.2 14.8 1,308.4  4.1 3.6 7.7 569.2 

Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows(1)

  0.3 0.3  

Loans sold with recourse

  0.3 0.3 56.4   0.3 0.3 76.6 

Securities lending indemnifications(1)

 47.6  47.6   64.5  64.5  

Credit card merchant processing(1)

 56.7  56.7   59.7  59.7  

Custody indemnifications and other

  21.6 21.6 149.2   33.5 33.5 121.4 
                  

Total

 $152.9 $98.9 $251.8 $1,826.6  $179.1 $89.9 $269.0 $1,238.4 
                  

(1)
The carrying values of guarantees of collections of contractual cash flows, securities lending indemnifications and credit card merchant processing are not material, as the Company has determined that the amount and probability of potential liabilities arising from these guarantees are not significant.

(2)
Reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

Financial Standby Lettersstandby letters of Creditcredit

        Citigroup issues standby letters of credit which substitute its own credit for that of the borrower. If a letter of credit is drawn down, the borrower is obligated to repay Citigroup. Standby letters of credit protect a third party from defaults on contractual obligations. Financial standby letters of credit include guarantees of payment of insurance premiums and reinsurance risks that support industrial revenue bond underwriting and settlement of payment obligations to clearing houses, and also support options and purchases of securities or are in lieu of escrow deposit accounts. Financial standbys also backstop loans, credit facilities, promissory notes and trade acceptances.

Performance Guaranteesguarantees

        Performance guarantees and letters of credit are issued to guarantee a customer's tender bid on a construction or systems-installation project or to guarantee completion of such projects in accordance with contract terms. They are also issued to support a customer's obligation to supply specified products, commodities, or maintenance or warranty services to a third party.

Derivative Instruments Consideredinstruments considered to Be Guaranteesbe guarantees

        Derivatives are financial instruments whose cash flows are based on a notional amount or an underlying instrument, where there is little or no initial investment, and whose terms require or permit net settlement. Derivatives may be used for a variety of reasons, including risk management, or to enhance returns. Financial institutions often act as intermediaries for their clients, helping clients reduce their risks. However, derivatives may also be used to take a risk position.

        The derivative instruments considered to be guarantees, which are presented in the tabletables above, include only those instruments that require Citi to make payments to the counterparty based on changes in an underlying that is related to an asset, a liability, or an equity security held by the guaranteed party. More specifically, derivative instruments considered to be guarantees include certain over-the-counter written put options where the counterparty is not a bank, hedge fund or broker-dealer (such counterparties are considered to be


Table of Contents

dealers in these markets and may therefore not hold the underlying instruments). However, credit derivatives sold by the Company are excluded from this presentation.presentation, as they are disclosed separately in Note 15. In addition, non-credit derivative contracts that are cash settled and for which the Company is unable to assert that it is probable the counterparty held the underlying instrument at the inception of the contract also are excluded from the disclosure above. The Company's credit derivative portfolio as protection seller (guarantor) is presented in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Derivative Activities."

        In instances where the Company's maximum potential future payment is unlimited, the notional amount of the contract is disclosed.

Guarantees of Collection of Contractual Cash Flows

        Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows protect investors in credit card receivables securitization trusts from loss of interest relating to insufficient collections on the underlying receivables in the trusts. The notional amount of these guarantees as of December 31, 2008, was $300 million. No such guarantees were outstanding at September 30, 2009.

Loans Soldsold with Recourserecourse

        Loans sold with recourse represent the Company's obligations to reimburse the buyers for loan losses under certain circumstances. Recourse refers to the clause in a sales agreement under which a lender will fully reimburse the buyer/investor for any losses resulting from the purchased loans. This may be accomplished by the seller's taking back any loans that become delinquent.

Securities Lending Indemnificationslending indemnifications

        Owners of securities frequently lend those securities for a fee to other parties who may sell them short or deliver them to another party to satisfy some other obligation. Banks may administer such securities lending programs for their clients. Securities lending indemnifications are issued by the bank to guarantee that a securities lending customer will be made whole in the event that the security borrower does not return the security subject to the lending agreement and collateral held is insufficient to cover the market value of the security.

Credit Card Merchant Processingcard merchant processing

        Credit card merchant processing guarantees represent the Company's indirect obligations in connection with the processing of private label and bankcard transactions on behalf of merchants.

        Citigroup's primary credit card business is the issuance of credit cards to individuals. In addition, the Company provides transaction processing services to various merchants with respect to bankcard and private-label cards. In the event of a billing dispute with respect to a bankcard transaction between a merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholder's favor, the third party holds the primary contingent liability to credit or refund the amount to the cardholder and charge back the transaction to the merchant. If the third party is unable to collect this amount from the merchant, it bears the loss for the amount of the credit or refund paid to the cardholder.

        The Company continues to have the primary contingent liability with respect to its portfolio of private-label merchants. The risk of loss is mitigated as the cash flows between the third party or the Company and the merchant are settled on a net basis and the third party or the Company has the right to offset any payments with cash flows otherwise due to the merchant. To further mitigate this risk, the third party or the Company may require a merchant to make an escrow deposit, delay settlement, or include event triggers to provide the third party or the Company with more financial and operational control in the event of the financial deterioration of the merchant, or require various credit enhancements (including letters of credit and bank guarantees). In the unlikely event that a private labelprivate-label merchant is unable to deliver products, services or a refund to its private labelprivate-label cardholders, Citigroup is contingently liable to credit or refund cardholders. In addition, although a third party holds the primary contingent liability with respect to the processing of bankcard transactions, in the event that the third party does not have sufficient collateral from the merchant or sufficient financial resources of its own to provide the credit or refunds to the cardholders, Citigroup would be liable to credit or refund the cardholders.

        The Company's maximum potential contingent liability related to both bankcard and private labelprivate-label merchant processing services is estimated to be the total volume of credit card transactions that meet the requirements to be valid chargeback transactions at any given time. At SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and


December 31, 2008,2009, this maximum potential exposure was estimated to be $59$61 billion and $57$60 billion, respectively.

        However, the Company believes that the maximum exposure is not representative of the actual potential loss exposure based on the Company's historical experience and its position as a secondary guarantor (in the case of bankcards). In most cases, this contingent liability is unlikely to arise, as most products and services are delivered when purchased, and amounts are refunded when items are returned to merchants. The Company assesses the probability and amount of its contingent liability related to merchant processing based on the financial strength of the primary guarantor (in the case of bankcards) and the extent and nature of unresolved chargebacks and its historical loss experience. At SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the estimated losses incurred and the carrying amounts of the Company's contingent obligations related to merchant processing activities were immaterial.

Custody Indemnificationsindemnifications

        Custody indemnifications are issued to guarantee that custody clients will be made whole in the event that a third-party subcustodian or depository institution fails to safeguard clients' assets.

Other

        As of December 31, 2008,        Citigroup carried a reserve of $149 millionhas an accrual related to certain of Visa USA's litigation matters. As


Table of Contents

of SeptemberJune 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying value of the reserveaccrual was $155 million. This reserve$276 million and $121 million, respectively, and the amount is included inOther liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Other Guaranteesguarantees and Indemnificationsindemnifications

        The Company, through its credit card business, provides various cardholder protection programs on several of its card products, including programs that provide insurance coverage for rental cars, coverage for certain losses associated with purchased products, price protection for certain purchases and protection for lost luggage. These guarantees are not included in the table, since the total outstanding amount of the guarantees and the Company's maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified. The protection is limited to certain types of purchases and certain types of losses and it is not possible to quantify the purchases that would qualify for these benefits at any given time. The Company assesses the probability and amount of its potential liability related to these programs based on the extent and nature of its historical loss experience. At SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the actual and estimated losses incurred and the carrying value of the Company's obligations related to these programs were immaterial.

        In the normal course of business, the Company provides standard representations and warranties to counterparties in contracts in connection with numerous transactions and also provides indemnifications that protect the counterparties to the contracts in the event that additional taxes are owed due either to a change in the tax law or an adverse interpretation of the tax law. Counterparties to these transactions provide the Company with comparable indemnifications. While such representations, warranties and tax indemnifications are essential components of many contractual relationships, they do not represent the underlying business purpose for the transactions. The indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms related to the Company's own performance under the terms of a contract and are entered into in the normal course of business based on an assessment that the risk of loss is remote. Often these clauses are intended to ensure that terms of a contract are met at inception (for example, that loans transferred to a counterparty in a sales transaction did in fact meet the conditions specified in the contract at the transfer date). No compensation is received for these standard representations and warranties, and it is not possible to determine their fair value because they rarely, if ever, result in a payment. In many cases, there are no stated or notional amounts included in the indemnification clauses and the contingencies potentially triggering the obligation to indemnify have not occurred and are not expected to occur. There are no amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, related to theseThese indemnifications and they are not included in the table.table above.

        In addition, the Company is a member of or shareholder in hundreds of value-transfer networks (VTNs) (payment clearing and settlement systems as well as securities exchanges) around the world. As a condition of membership, many of these VTNs require that members stand ready to backstop the net effect on the VTNs of a member's default on its obligations. The Company's potential obligations as a shareholder or member of VTN associations are not considered to be guarantees,excluded from the scope of FIN 45, since the shareholders and members represent subordinated classes of investors in the VTNs. Accordingly, the Company's participation in VTNs is not reported in the table and there are no amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 or December 31, 20082009 for potential obligations that could arise from the Company's involvement with VTN associations.

        At September        In the sale of an insurance subsidiary, the Company provided an indemnification to an insurance company for policyholder claims and other liabilities relating to a book of long-term care (LTC) business (for the entire term of the LTC policies) that is fully reinsured by another insurance company. The reinsurer has funded two trusts with securities whose fair value (approximately $3.8 billion and $3.3 billion at June 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively) is designed to cover the insurance company's statutory liabilities for the LTC policies. The assets in these trusts are evaluated and adjusted periodically to ensure that the fair value of the assets continues to cover the estimated statutory liabilities related to the LTC policies, as those statutory liabilities change over time. If the reinsurer fails to perform under the reinsurance agreement for any reason, including insolvency, and the assets in the two trusts are insufficient or unavailable to the ceding insurance company, then Citigroup must indemnify the ceding insurance company for any losses actually incurred in connection with the LTC policies. Since both events would have to occur before Citi would become responsible for any payment to the ceding insurance company pursuant to its indemnification obligation and the likelihood of such events occurring is currently not probable, there is no liability reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 related to this indemnification.


        At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the total carrying amounts of the liabilities related to the guarantees and indemnifications included in the table amounted to approximately $1.6 billion and $1.8$1.2 billion, respectively. The carrying value of derivative instruments is included in eitherTrading account liabilities orOther liabilities, depending upon whether the derivative was entered into for trading or non-trading purposes. The carrying value of financial and performance guarantees is included inOther liabilities. For loans sold with recourse, the carrying value of the liability is included inOther liabilities. In addition, at SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009,Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet include an allowance for credit losses of $1,074 million$1.054 billion and $887 million$1.122 billion relating to letters of credit and unfunded lending commitments, respectively.

Collateral

        Cash collateral available to the Company to reimburse losses realized under these guarantees and indemnifications amounted to $36$33 billion and $31 billion at SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and $33 billion at December 31, 2008.2009, respectively. Securities and other marketable assets held as collateral amounted to $39$45 billion and $27$43 billion, at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, the majority of which collateral is held to reimburse losses realized under securities lending indemnifications. Additionally, letters of credit in favor of the Company held as collateral amounted to $900 million$1.6 billion at June 30, 2010 and $503 million$1.4 billion at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.2009. Other property may also be available to the Company to cover losses under certain guarantees and indemnifications; however, the value of such property has not been determined.


Table of Contents

Performance Riskrisk

        Citigroup evaluates the performance risk of its guarantees based on the assigned referenced counterparty internal or external ratings. Where external ratings are used, investment-grade ratings are considered to be Baa/BBB and above, while anything below is considered non-investment grade. The Citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external rating system. On certain underlying referenced credits or entities, ratings are not available. Such referenced credits are included in the "Not-rated"not rated category. The maximum potential amount of the future payments related to guarantees and credit derivatives sold is determined to be the notional amount of these contracts, which is the par amount of the assets guaranteed.

        Presented in the tables below isare the maximum potential amountamounts of future payments classified based upon internal and external credit ratings as of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008.2009. As previously mentioned, the determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. Such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.


 Maximum potential amount of future payments  Maximum potential amount of future payments 
In billions of dollars as of September 30, 2009 Investment
grade
 Non-investment
grade
 Not rated Total 
In billions of dollars as of June 30, 2010 Investment
grade
 Non-investment
grade
 Not rated Total 

Financial standby letters of credit

 $48.5 $21.1 $27.4 $97.0  $47.7 $14.3 $22.8 $84.8 

Performance guarantees

 7.0 3.7 3.8 14.5  6.4 3.6 2.9 12.9 

Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees

   16.4 16.4    7.3 7.3 

Loans sold with recourse

   0.3 0.3    0.3 0.3 

Securities lending indemnifications

   66.1 66.1    68.9 68.9 

Credit card merchant processing

   59.4 59.4    61.1 61.1 

Custody indemnifications and other

 22.3 5.2  27.5  29.2 6.0  35.2 
                  

Total

 $77.8 $30.0 $173.4 $281.2  $83.3 $23.9 $163.3 $270.5 
                  

 


 Maximum potential amount of future payments  Maximum potential amount of future payments 
In billions of dollars as of December 31, 2008 Investment
grade
 Non-investment
grade
 Not rated Total 
In billions of dollars as of December 31, 2009 Investment
grade
 Non-investment
grade
 Not rated Total 

Financial standby letters of credit

 $49.2 $28.6 $16.4 $94.2  $49.2 $13.5 $26.7 $89.4 

Performance guarantees

 5.7 5.0 5.6 16.3  6.5 3.7 3.7 13.9 

Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees

   14.8 14.8    7.7 7.7 

Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows

   0.3 0.3 

Loans sold with recourse

   0.3 0.3    0.3 0.3 

Securities lending indemnifications

   47.6 47.6    64.5 64.5 

Credit card merchant processing

   56.7 56.7    59.7 59.7 

Custody indemnifications and other

 18.5 3.1  21.6  27.7 5.8  33.5 
                  

Total

 $73.4 $36.7 $141.7 $251.8  $83.4 $23.0 $162.6 $269.0 
                  

TableCredit Commitments and Lines of Contents

Credit Commitments

        The table below summarizes Citigroup's othercredit commitments as of SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008.2009:

In millions of dollars U.S. Outside of
U.S.
 September 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
  U.S. Outside of
U.S.
 June 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

Commercial and similar letters of credit

 $1,691 $5,625 $7,316 $8,215  $1,484 $6,930 $8,414 $7,211 

One- to four-family residential mortgages

 1,002 260 1,262 937  1,026 315 1,341 1,070 

Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties

 22,186 2,919 25,105 25,212  19,240 2,717 21,957 23,916 

Commercial real estate, construction and land development

 1,059 604 1,663 2,702  1,872 316 2,188 1,704 

Credit card lines

 680,750 134,402 815,152 1,002,437  596,701 123,501 720,202 785,495 

Commercial and other consumer loan commitments

 172,708 89,451 262,159 309,997  118,533 79,290 197,823 257,342 
                  

Total

 $879,396 $233,261 $1,112,657 $1,349,500  $738,856 $213,069 $951,925 $1,076,738 
                  

        The majority of unused commitments are contingent upon customers' maintaining specific credit standards. Commercial commitments generally have floating interest rates and fixed expiration dates and may require payment of fees. Such fees (net of certain direct costs) are deferred and, upon exercise of the commitment, amortized over the life of the loan or, if exercise is deemed remote, amortized over the commitment period.

Commercial and similar letters of credit

        A commercial letter of credit is an instrument by which Citigroup substitutes its credit for that of a customer to enable the customerscustomer to finance the purchase of goods or to incur other commitments. Citigroup issues a letter on behalf of its client to a supplier and agrees to pay themthe supplier upon presentation of documentary evidence that the supplier has performed in accordance with the terms of the letter of credit. When a letter of credit is drawn, the customer is then is required to reimburse Citigroup.

One- to four-family residential mortgages

        A one- to four-family residential mortgage commitment is a written confirmation from Citigroup to a seller of a property that the bank will advance the specified sums enabling the buyer to complete the purchase.

Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties

        Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties are essentially home equity lines of credit. A home equity line of credit is a loan secured by a primary residence or second home to the extent of the excess of fair market value over the debt outstanding for the first mortgage.

Commercial Real Estate, Constructionreal estate, construction and Land Developmentland development

        Commercial real estate, construction and land development include unused portions of commitments to extend credit for the purpose of financing commercial and multifamily residential properties as well as land development projects. Both secured-by-real estatesecured-by-real-estate and unsecured commitments are included in this line. In addition,line, as well as undistributed loan proceeds, where there is an obligation to advance for construction progress are also included in this line.payments. However, this line only includes those extensions of credit that, once funded, will be classified as LoansTotal loans, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Credit card lines

        Citigroup provides credit to customers by issuing credit cards. The credit card lines are unconditionally cancellable by the issuer.

Commercial and other consumer loan commitments

        Commercial and other consumer loan commitments include overdraft and liquidity facilities, as well as commercial commitments to make or purchase loans, to purchase third-party receivables, and to provide note issuance or revolving underwriting facilities.facilities and to invest in the form of equity. Amounts include $130$79 billion and $140$126 billion with an original maturity of less than one year at SeptemberJune 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively.

        In addition, included in this line item are highly leveraged financing commitments, which are agreements that provide funding to a borrower with higher levels of debt (measured by the ratio of debt capital to equity capital of the borrower) than is generally considered normal for other companies. This type of financing is commonly employed in corporate acquisitions, management buy-outs and similar transactions.


Table of Contents


21.20.   CONTINGENCIES

        The CompanyIn accordance with ASC 450 (formerly SFAS 5), Citigroup establishes accruals for litigation and regulatory matters when it is probable that a defendantloss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, accruals are adjusted from time to time, as appropriate, in numerous lawsuits and other legal proceedings arising outlight of alleged misconduct in connection with certain matters.additional information. In view of the large numberinherent unpredictability of such matters, the uncertainties of the timing and outcome of this type of litigation, the novel issues presented, and the significant amounts involved, it is possible that the ultimate costs of these matters may exceed or be below the Company's litigation reserves. The Company will continue to defend itself vigorously in these cases, and seek to resolve them in the manner management believes is in the best interests of the Company.

        In addition, in the ordinary course of business, Citigroup and its subsidiaries are defendants or co-defendants or parties in various litigation and regulatory matters, incidental to and typicalparticularly where the damages sought are substantial or indeterminate, the investigations or proceedings are in the early stages, or the matters involve novel legal theories or a large number of parties, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, in excess of the businesses in which they are engaged. Inamounts accrued for these matters or predict the timing of their eventual resolution, and the actual costs of resolving litigation and regulatory matters may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those matters.

        Subject to the foregoing, it is the opinion of Citigroup's management, based on current knowledge and after taking into account available insurance coverage and its current accruals, that the Company's management, the ultimate resolutioneventual outcome of these legal and regulatory proceedingsmatters would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of Citi. Nonetheless, given the Company but, if involving monetary liability, may beinherent unpredictability of litigation and the substantial or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters, an adverse outcome in certain of these matters could, from time to time, have a material to the Company's operatingadverse effect on Citi's consolidated results for anyof operations or cash flows in particular period.quarterly or annual periods.


Table of Contents


22.21.    CITIBANK, N.A. STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY

Statement of Changes in Stockholder's Equity (Unaudited)

 Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries 

 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  Six Months Ended June 30, 
In millions of dollars, except shares 2009 2008  2010 2009 

Common stock ($20 par value)

  

Balance, beginning of period—Shares: 37,534,553 in 2009 and 2008

 $751 $751 

Balance, beginning of period—shares: 37,534,553 in 2010 and 2009

 $751 $751 
          

Balance, end of period—Shares: 37,534,553 in 2009 and 2008

 $751 $751 

Balance, end of period

 $751 $751 
          

Surplus

  

Balance, beginning of period

 $74,767 $69,135  $107,923 $74,767 

Capital contribution from parent company

 30,492 77  810 27,481 

Employee benefit plans

 34 107  366 15 
          

Balance, end of period

 $105,293 $69,319  $109,099 $102,263 
          

Retained earnings

  

Balance, beginning of period

 $21,735 $31,915  $19,457 $21,735 

Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)

 402  

Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)(2)

 (411) 402 
          

Adjusted balance, beginning of period

 $22,137 $31,915  $19,046 $22,137 

Net income (loss)

 (2,270) (1,450)

Dividends paid

 4 (34)

Other(2)

 117  

Net income

 4,920 (1,477)

Dividends(3)

 9 3 

Other(4)

  117 
          

Balance, end of period

 $19,988 $30,431  $23,975 $20,780 
          

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

  

Balance, beginning of period

 $(15,895)$(2,495) $(11,532)$(15,895)

Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)

 (402)    (402)
          

Adjusted balance, beginning of period

 $(16,297)$(2,495) $(11,532)$(16,297)

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net of taxes

 3,758 (4,971) 1,787 1,731 

Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of taxes

 850 (2,244)

Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes

 (2,708) (164)

Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes

 281 (214) 226 737 

Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes

 (7) 90   29 
          

Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 $4,882 $(7,339)

Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 $(695)$2,333 
          

Balance, end of period

 $(11,415)$(9,834) $(12,227)$(13,964)
          

Total Citibank common stockholder's equity and total Citibank stockholder's equity

 $114,617 $90,667 

Total Citibank stockholder's equity

 $121,598 $109,830 
          

Noncontrolling interest

  

Balance, beginning of period

 $1,082 $1,266  $1,294 $1,082 

Initial consolidation of a noncontrolling interest

 123  

Initial origination of a noncontrolling interest

 (75)  

Transactions between noncontrolling interest and the related consolidating subsidiary

 (1)  

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest shareholders

 46 88  48 23 

Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest shareholders

 (16) (86) (1) (16)

Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investments securities, net of tax

 7 3 

Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of tax

 6 1 

Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax

 15 6  (105) (40)

All other

 (155) (5) (42) (153)
          

Net change in noncontrolling interest

 $20 $6  $(170)$(185)
          

Balance, end of period

 $1,102 $1,272  $1,124 $897 
          

Total equity

 $115,719 $91,939  $122,722 $110,727 
          

Comprehensive income (loss)

  

Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interest

 $(2,224)$(1,362) $4,968 $(1,454)

Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 4,904 (7,330)

Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 (794) 2,294 
          

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 $2,680 $(8,692) $4,174 $840 

Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest

 68 97  (51) (16)
          

Comprehensive income attributable to Citibank

 $2,612 $(8,789) $4,225 $856 
          

(1)
The adjustment to the opening balances forRetained earnings andAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in 2009 represents the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASC 320-10-65-1320-10-35-34 (FSP FAS 115-2)115-2 and FAS 124-2).

(2)
The adjustment to the opening balance forRetained earnings in 2010 represents the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASC 810,Consolidation (formerly FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities). See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)(3)
Includes common dividends related to forfeitures of previously issued but unvested employee stock awards.

(4)
Represents the accounting for the transfers of assets and liabilities between Citibank, N.A. and other affiliates under the common control of Citigroup.

Table of Contents


23.22.    SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

        The Company has evaluated subsequent events through NovemberAugust 6, 2009,2010, which is the date its Consolidated Financial Statements were issued.


24.23.    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTSTATEMENTS SCHEDULES

        These unaudited condensed consolidating financial statementConsolidating Financial Statements schedules are presented for purposes of additional analysis but should be considered in relation to the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup taken as a whole.

Citigroup Parent Company

        The holding company, Citigroup Inc.

Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI)

        Citigroup guarantees various debt obligations of CGMHI as well as all of the outstanding debt obligations under CGMHI's publicly issued debt.

Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI)

        CFI is a first-tier subsidiary of Citigroup, which issues commercial paper, medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and credit-linked notes, all of which are guaranteed by Citigroup.

CitiFinancial Credit Company (CCC)

        An indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. CCC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Associates First Capital Corporation (described below).Associates. Citigroup has issued a full and unconditional guarantee of the outstanding indebtedness of CCC.

Associates First Capital Corporation (Associates)

        A wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. Citigroup has issued a full and unconditional guarantee of the outstanding long-term debt securities and commercial paper of Associates. In addition, Citigroup guaranteed various debt obligations of Citigroup Finance Canada Inc. (CFCI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Associates. CFCI continues to issue debt in the Canadian market supported by a Citigroup guarantee. Associates is the immediate parent company of CCC (described above).CCC.

Other Citigroup Subsidiaries

        Includes all other subsidiaries of Citigroup, intercompany eliminations, and income/loss from discontinued operations.

Consolidating Adjustments

        Includes Citigroup parent company elimination of distributed and undistributed income of subsidiaries, investment in subsidiaries and the elimination of CCC, which is included in the Associates column.


Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOMECondensed Consolidating Statements of Income


 Three Months Ended September 30, 2009  Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
  Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
and income
from
discontinued
operations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Revenues

  

Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

 $1,005 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,005)$  $8,827 $ $ $ $ $ $(8,827)$ 
                 

Interest revenue

 $57 1,682 $ $1,526 $1,759 $15,180 $(1,526)$18,678  68 $1,561 $ $1,329 $1,523 $17,266 $(1,329)$20,418 

Interest revenue—intercompany

 477 (90) 1,053 1,689 96 (1,536) (1,689)   539 431 813 20 95 (1,878) (20)  

Interest expense

 2,495 644 400 17 84 3,057 (17) 6,680  2,163 575 467 23 53 3,121 (23) 6,379 

Interest expense—intercompany

 (137) (165) 260 2,212 377 (335) (2,212)   (206) 410 74 508 332 (610) (508)  
                                  

Net interest revenue

 $(1,824)$1,113 $393 $986 $1,394 $10,922 $(986)$11,998  $(1,350)$1,007 $272 $818 $1,233 $12,877 $(818)$14,039 
                                  

Commissions and fees

 $ $1,229 $ $16 $36 $1,953 $(16)$3,218  $ $925 $ $12 $42 $2,262 $(12)$3,229 

Commissions and fees—intercompany

  188  51 63 (251) (51)    23  37 42 (65) (37)  

Principal transactions

 317 2,431 (610)  2 (480)  1,660  48 2,226 212  (4) (265)  2,217 

Principal transactions—intercompany

 (493) (1,380) 192  (13) 1,694    1 (1,277) 116  (105) 1,265   

Other income

 (1,158) 676 (100) 112 142 3,954 (112) 3,514  (1,357) 49 200 111 232 3,462 (111) 2,586 

Other income—intercompany

 2,485 23 77  5 (2,590)    1,330 (25) (218) (1) 7 (1,094) 1  
                                  

Total non-interest revenues

 $1,151 $3,167 $(441)$179 $235 $4,280 $(179)$8,392  $22 $1,921 $310 $159 $214 $5,565 $(159)$8,032 
                                  

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $332 $4,280 $(48)$1,165 $1,629 $15,202 $(2,170)$20,390  $7,499 $2,928 $582 $977 $1,447 $18,442 $(9,804)$22,071 
                                  

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $ $58 $ $770 $875 $8,162 $(770)$9,095  $ $23 $ $618 $702 $5,940 $(618)$6,665 
                                  

Expenses

  

Compensation and benefits

 $(44)$1,471 $ $134 $179 $4,530 $(134)$6,136  $(2)$1,367 $ $158 $209 $4,387 $(158)$5,961 

Compensation and benefits— intercompany

 2 68  35 35 (105) (35)  

Compensation and benefits—intercompany

 1 52  33 33 (86) (33)  

Other expense

 192 683 1 169 209 4,603 (169) 5,688  65 1,023  123 167 4,650 (123) 5,905 

Other expense—intercompany

 163 198 2 143 160 (523) (143)   91 (49) 2 141 153 (197) (141)  
                                  

Total operating expenses

 $313 $2,420 $3 $481 $583 $8,505 $(481)$11,824  $155 $2,393 $2 $455 $562 $8,754 $(455)$11,866 
                                  

Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 $19 $1,802 $(51)$(86)$171 $(1,465)$(919)$(529)

Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 $7,344 $512 $580 $(96)$183 $3,748 $(8,731)$3,540 

Income taxes (benefits)

 (392) 608 (18) (53) 37 (1,357) 53 (1,122) (406) 165 199 (30) 47 807 30 812 

Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 (310)      310   (5,053)      5,053  
                                  

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $101 $1,194 $(33)$(33)$134 $(108)$(662)$593 

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

      (418)  (418)

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $2,697 $347 $381 $(66)$136 $2,941 $(3,708)$2,728 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

      (3)  (3)
                                  

Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

 $101 $1,194 $(33)$(33)$134 $(526)$(662)$175 

Net income (loss) before attrition of noncontrolling interest

 $2,697 $347 $381 $(66)$136 $2,938 $(3,708)$2,725 
                                  

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

  19    55  74 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  2    26  28 
                                  

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $101 $1,175 $(33)$(33)$134 $(581)$(662)$101 

Citigroup's net income (loss)

 $2,697 $345 $381 $(66)$136 $2,912 $(3,708)$2,697 
                                  

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOMECondensed Consolidating Statements of Income

 
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Revenues

                         

Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

 $1,040 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,040)$ 
                  

Interest revenue

 $234 $5,881 $1 $4,732 $5,418 $47,398 $(4,732)$58,932 

Interest revenue—intercompany

  1,833  2,079  3,143  46  325  (7,380) (46)  

Interest expense

  6,707  2,060  1,365  63  303  10,744  (63) 21,179 

Interest expense—intercompany

  (667) 1,635  699  1,677  1,242  (2,909) (1,677)  
                  

Net interest revenue

 $(3,973)$4,265 $1,080 $3,038 $4,198 $32,183 $(3,038)$37,753 
                  

Commissions and fees

 $ $4,711 $ $38 $95 $8,017 $(38)$12,823 

Commissions and fees—intercompany

    247    86  107  (354) (86)  

Principal transactions

  434  1,302  (869)   2  4,894    5,763 

Principal transactions—intercompany

  (714) 2,530  133    (99) (1,850)    

Other income

  3,514  13,296  (25) 321  489  1,267  (321) 18,541 

Other income—intercompany

  (1,906) (12) 16  2  37  1,865  (2)  
                  

Total non-interest revenues

 $1,328 $22,074 $(745)$447 $631 $13,839 $(447)$37,127 
                  

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $(1,605)$26,339 $335 $3,485 $4,829 $46,022 $(4,525)$74,880 
                  

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $ $96 $ $2,708 $3,044 $28,938 $(2,708)$32,078 
                  

Expenses

                         

Compensation and benefits

 $(89)$5,144 $ $393 $514 $13,161 $(393)$18,730 

Compensation and benefits— intercompany

  5  403    106  106  (514) (106)  

Other expense

  600  2,011  2  358  471  13,694  (358) 16,778 

Other expense—intercompany

  260  538  7  416  465  (1,270) (416)  
                  

Total operating expenses

 $776 $8,096 $9 $1,273 $1,556 $25,071 $(1,273)$35,508 
                  

Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 $(2,381)$18,147 $326 $(496)$229 $(7,987)$(544)$7,294 

Income taxes (benefits)

  (1,437) 6,772  97  (201) 52  (4,864) 201  620 

Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

  6,917            (6,917)  
                  

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $5,973 $11,375 $229 $(295)$177 $(3,123)$(7,662)$6,674 

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

            (677)   (677)
                  

Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

 $5,973 $11,375 $229 $(295)$177 $(3,800)$(7,662)$5,997 
                  

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

    (32)       56    24 
                  

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $5,973 $11,407 $229 $(295)$177 $(3,856)$(7,662)$5,973 
                  

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME


 Three Months Ended September 30, 2008  Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
  Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
and income
from
discontinued
operations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Revenues

  

Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

 $169 $ $ $ $ $ $(169)$  $11,604 $ $ $ $ $ $(11,604)$ 
                 

Interest revenue

 $226 $4,455 $ $1,819 $2,084 $19,365 $(1,819)$26,130  $143 $3,051 $ $2,728 $3,129 $34,947 $(2,728)$41,270 

Interest revenue—intercompany

 1,098 565 1,269 21 147 (3,079) (21)   1,047 996 1,637 40 191 (3,871) (40)  

Interest expense

 2,388 2,740 835 33 154 6,609 (33) 12,726  4,351 1,097 1,266 47 147 5,809 (47) 12,670 

Interest expense—intercompany

 (101) 1,867 (1) 605 490 (2,255) (605)   (405) 1,076 (208) 1,025 640 (1,103) (1,025)  
                                  

Net interest revenue

 $(963)$413 $435 $1,202 $1,587 $11,932 $(1,202)$13,404  $(2,756)$1,874 $579 $1,696 $2,533 $26,370 $(1,696)$28,600 
                                  

Commissions and fees

 $ $1,841 $ $20 $43 $1,324 $(20)$3,208  $ $2,212 $ $23 $75 $4,587 $(23)$6,874 

Commissions and fees—intercompany

 346 21  9 11 (378) (9)    81  77 86 (167) (77)  

Principal transactions

 (497) (3,318) 2,239  (1) (1,436)  (3,013) (69) 6,047 501  (6) (103)  6,370 

Principal transactions—intercompany

 335 (900) (1,542)  36 2,071    (3)$(2,945) (157)  (123) 3,228   

Other income

 332 784 (130) 65 87 1,586 (65) 2,659  (338) 401  214 373 5,212 (214) 5,648 

Other income—intercompany

 206 35 97 8 3 (341) (8)   505 5   16 (526)   
                                  

Total non-interest revenues

 $722 $(1,537)$664 $102 $179 $2,826 $(102)$2,854  $95 $5,801 $344 $314 $421 $12,231 $(314)$18,892 
                                  

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $(72)$(1,124)$1,099 $1,304 $1,766 $14,758 $(1,473)$16,258  $8,943 $7,675 $923 $2,010 $2,954 $38,601 $(13,614)$47,492 
                                  

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $ $7 $ $1,288 $1,368 $7,692 $(1,288)$9,067  $ $27 $ $1,303 $1,452 $13,804 $(1,303)$15,283 
                                  

Expenses

  

Compensation and benefits

 $(57)$2,244 $ $174 $232 $5,125 $(174)$7,544  $100 $2,863 $ $284 $389 $8,771 $(284)$12,123 

Compensation and benefits— intercompany

 2 226  46 46 (274) (46)  

Compensation and benefits—intercompany

 3 106  67 67 (176) (67)  

Other expense

 42 925 1 159 208 5,287 (159) 6,463  205 1,517  235 319 9,220 (235) 11,261 

Other expense—intercompany

 451 (120) 3 174 162 (496) (174)   155 192 4 320 340 (691) (320)  
                                  

Total operating expenses

 $438 $3,275 $4 $553 $648 $9,642 $(553)$14,007  $463 $4,678 $4 $906 $1,115 $17,124 $(906)$23,384 
                                  

Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 $(510)$(4,406)$1,095 $(537)$(250)$(2,576)$368 $(6,816)

Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 $8,480 $2,970 $919 $(199)$387 $7,673 $(11,405)$8,825 

Income taxes (benefits)

 (868) (1,893) 376 (185) (77) (833) 185 (3,295) (1,476) 985 318 (72) 114 1,907 72 1,848 

Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 (3,386)      3,386   (2,831)      2,831  
                                  

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $(3,028)$(2,513)$719 $(352)$(173)$(1,743)$3,569 $(3,521)

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

 213     400  613 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $7,125 $1,985 $601 $(127)$273 $5,766 $(8,646)$6,977 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

      208  208 
                                  

Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

 $(2,815)$(2,513)$719 $(352)$(173)$(1,343)$3,569 $(2,908)

Net income (loss) before attrition of noncontrolling interest

 $7,125 $1,985 $601 $(127)$273 $5,974 $(8,646)$7,185 
                                  

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

      (93)  (93)

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  16    44  60 
                                  

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $(2,815)$(2,513)$719 $(352)$(173)$(1,250)$3,569 $(2,815)

Citigroup's net income (loss)

 $7,125 $1,969 $601 $(127)$273 $5,930 $(8,646)$7,125 
                                  

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOMECondensed Consolidating Statements of Income

 
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Revenues

                         

Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

 $1,617 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,617)$ 
                  

Interest revenue

 $544 $15,239 $1 $5,447 $6,278 $60,566 $(5,447)$82,628 

Interest revenue—intercompany

  3,508  1,564  3,911  57  441  (9,424) (57)   

Interest expense

  6,987  10,076  2,645  108  491  21,951  (108) 42,150 

Interest expense—intercompany

  (242) 4,293  186  1,837  1,651  (5,888) (1,837)  
                  

Net interest revenue

 $(2,693)$2,434 $1,081 $3,559 $4,577 $35,079 $(3,559)$40,478 
                  

Commissions and fees

 $ $6,381 $1 $61 $135 $3,831 $(61)$10,348 

Commissions and fees—intercompany

    453    24  32  (485) (24)  

Principal transactions

  5  (20,400) 3,524    (1) 1,425    (15,447)

Principal transactions—intercompany

  115  4,680  (2,647)   26  (2,174)    

Other income

  443  2,798  (45) 286  378  7,000  (286) 10,574 

Other income—intercompany

  (33) 619  33  21  78  (697) (21)   
                  

Total non-interest revenues

 $530 $(5,469)$866 $392 $648 $8,900 $(392)$5,475 
                  

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $(546)$(3,035)$1,947 $3,951 $5,225 $43,979 $(5,568)$45,953 
                  

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $ $307 $ $3,046 $3,315 $18,397 $(3,046)$22,019 
                  

Expenses

                         

Compensation and benefits

 $(106)$7,728 $ $545 $747 $16,429 $(545)$24,798 

Compensation and benefits— intercompany

  6  693    145  146  (845) (145)  

Other expense

  158  2,855  2  416  550  16,235  (416) 19,800 

Other expense—intercompany

  596  711  49  336  367  (1,723) (336)  
                  

Total operating expenses

 $654 $11,987 $51 $1,442 $1,810 $30,096 $(1,442)$44,598 
                  

Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 $(1,200)$(15,329)$1,896 $(537)$100 $(4,514)$(1,080)$(20,664)

Income taxes (benefits)

  (1,643) (6,273) 656  (174) 54  (2,422) 174  (9,628)

Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

  (11,077)           11,077   
                  

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $(10,634)$(9,056)$1,240 $(363)$46 $(2,092)$9,823 $(11,036)

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  213          365    578 
                  

Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

 $(10,421)$(9,056)$1,240 $(363)$46 $(1,727)$9,823 $(10,458)
                  

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

    (7)       (30)   (37)
                  

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $(10,421)$(9,049)$1,240 $(363)$46 $(1,697)$9,823 $(10,421)
                  

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET

 
 September 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Assets

                         

Cash and due from banks

 $ $2,798 $ $181 $257 $23,427 $(181)$26,482 

Cash and due from banks—intercompany

  16  1,609  1  140  159  (1,785) (140)  

Federal funds sold and resale agreements

    176,406        20,951    197,357 

Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany

    23,165        (23,165)    

Trading account assets

  25  145,444  41    16  195,171    340,697 

Trading account assets—intercompany

  1,152  8,592  811    6  (10,561)    

Investments

  11,227  274    2,456  2,720  247,669  (2,456) 261,890 

Loans, net of unearned income

    430    43,534  49,907  571,874  (43,534) 622,211 

Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany

      144,343  3,512  6,716  (151,059) (3,512)  

Allowance for loan losses

    (139)   (3,425) (3,766) (32,511) 3,425  (36,416)
                  

Total loans, net

 $ $291 $144,343 $43,621 $52,857 $388,304 $(43,621)$585,795 

Advances to subsidiaries

  145,529          (145,529)    

Investments in subsidiaries

  210,989            (210,989)  

Other assets

  12,295  69,947  728  6,161  7,014  362,790  (6,161) 452,774 

Other assets—intercompany

  10,853  54,776  3,235  31  1,353  (70,217) (31)  

Assets of discontinued operations held for sale

            23,604    23,604 
                  

Total assets

 $392,086 $483,302 $149,159 $52,590 $64,382 $1,010,659 $(263,579)$1,888,599 
                  

Liabilities and equity

                         

Deposits

 $ $ $ $ $ $832,603 $ $832,603 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold

    139,681        38,478    178,159 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany

  185  4,485        (4,670)    

Trading account liabilities

    77,681  52      52,807    130,540 

Trading account liabilities—intercompany

  989  8,839  1,260      (11,088)    

Short-term borrowings

  1,249  5,554  10,065    434  47,429    64,731 

Short-term borrowings—intercompany

    91,015  80,610  5,135  34,483  (206,108) (5,135)  

Long-term debt

  214,981  15,403  51,208  1,677  6,348  91,617  (1,677) 379,557 

Long-term debt—intercompany

  445  46,273  1,208  37,868  15,453  (63,379) (37,868)  

Advances from subsidiaries

  21,958          (21,958)    

Other liabilities

  5,819  66,135  651  1,910  1,588  69,863  (1,910) 144,056 

Other liabilities—intercompany

  5,618  9,378  177  700  325  (15,498) (700)  

Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale

            16,004    16,004 
                  

Total liabilities

 $251,244 $464,444 $145,231 $47,290 $58,631 $826,100 $(47,290)$1,745,650 
                  

Citigroup stockholder's equity

 $140,842 $18,443 $3,928 $5,300 $5,751 $182,867 $(216,289)$140,842 

Noncontrolling interest

    415        1,692    2,107 
                  

Total equity

 $140,842 $18,858 $3,928 $5,300 $5,751 $184,559 $(216,289)$142,949 
                  

Total liabilities and equity

 $392,086 $483,302 $149,159 $52,590 $64,382 $1,010,659 $(263,579)$1,888,599 
                  
 
 Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Revenues

                         

Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

 $16 $ $ $ $ $ $(16)$ 

Interest revenue

 $57 $1,930 $1 $1,573 $1,795 $15,888 $(1,573)$19,671 

Interest revenue—intercompany

  554  1,461  1,030  (1,653) 113  (3,158) 1,653   

Interest expense

  1,988  725  449  21  117  3,563  (21) 6,842 

Interest expense—intercompany

  (294) 701  260  (1,111) 395  (1,062) 1,111   
                  

Net interest revenue

 $(1,083)$1,965 $322 $1,010 $1,396 $10,229 $(1,010)$12,829 
                  

Commissions and fees

 $ $1,829 $ $11 $29 $2,226 $(11)$4,084 

Commissions and fees—intercompany

    26    16  23  (49) (16)  

Principal transactions

  474  575  (1,245)   2  1,982    1,788 

Principal transactions—intercompany

  (364) 772  614    (76) (946)    

Other income

  1,150  11,918  115  107  199  (2,114) (107) 11,268 

Other income—intercompany

  (2,022) (53) (91) 2  8  2,158  (2)  
                  

Total non-interest revenues

 $(762)$15,067 $(607)$136 $185 $3,257 $(136)$17,140 
                  

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $(1,829)$17,032 $(285)$1,146 $1,581 $13,486 $(1,162)$29,969 
                  

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $ $14 $ $982 $1,118 $11,544 $(982)$12,676 
                  

Expenses

                         

Compensation and benefits

 $5 $1,816 $ $139 $187 $4,351 $(139)$6,359 

Compensation and benefits— intercompany

  1  142    71  34  (177) (71)  

Other expense

  180  669    80  115  4,676  (80) 5,640 

Other expense—intercompany

  (12) 334  2  107  152  (476) (107)  
                  

Total operating expenses

 $174 $2,961 $2 $397 $488 $8,374 $(397)$11,999 
                  

Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 $(2,003)$14,057 $(287)$(233)$(25)$(6,432)$217 $5,294 

Income taxes (benefits)

  (1,696) 5,472  (117) (89) (17) (2,735) 89  907 

Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

  4,586            (4,586)  
                  

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $4,279 $8,585 $(170)$(144)$(8)$(3,697)$(4,458)$4,387 

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

            (142)   (142)
                  

Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $4,279 $8,585 $(170)$(144)$(8)$(3,839)$(4,458)$4,245 
                  

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

    (50)       16    (34)
                  

Citigroup's net income (loss)

 $4,279 $8,635 $(170)$(144)$(8)$(3,855)$(4,458)$4,279 
                  

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETCondensed Consolidating Statements of Income

 
 December 31, 2008 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Assets

                         

Cash and due from banks

 $ $3,142 $ $149 $211 $25,900 $(149)$29,253 

Cash and due from banks—intercompany

  13  1,415  1  141  185  (1,614) (141)  

Federal funds sold and resale agreements

    167,589        16,544    184,133 

Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany

    31,446        (31,446)    

Trading account assets

  20  155,136  88    15  222,376    377,635 

Trading account assets—intercompany

  818  11,197  4,439    182  (16,636)    

Investments

  25,611  382    2,059  2,366  227,661  (2,059) 256,020 

Loans, net of unearned income

    663    48,663  55,387  638,166  (48,663) 694,216 

Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany

      134,744  3,433  11,129  (145,873) (3,433)  

Allowance for loan losses

    (122)   (3,415) (3,649) (25,845) 3,415  (29,616)
                  

Total loans, net

 $ $541 $134,744 $48,681 $62,867 $466,448 $(48,681)$664,600 

Advances to subsidiaries

  167,043          (167,043)    

Investments in subsidiaries

  149,424            (149,424)  

Other assets

  12,148  74,740  51  6,156  6,970  332,920  (6,156) 426,829 

Other assets—intercompany

  14,998  108,952  3,997  254  504  (128,451) (254)  
                  

Total assets

 $370,075 $554,540 $143,320 $57,440 $73,300 $946,659 $(206,864)$1,938,470 
                  

Liabilities and equity

                         

Deposits

 $ $ $ $ $ $774,185 $ $774,185 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold

    165,914        39,379    205,293 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany

  8,673  34,007        (42,680)    

Trading account liabilities

    70,006  14      95,780    165,800 

Trading account liabilities—intercompany

  732  12,751  2,660      (16,143)    

Short-term borrowings

  2,571  9,735  30,994    222  83,169    126,691 

Short-term borrowings—intercompany

    87,432  66,615  6,360  39,637  (193,684) (6,360)  

Long-term debt

  192,290  20,623  37,374  2,214  8,333  100,973  (2,214) 359,593 

Long-term debt—intercompany

    60,318  878  40,722  17,655  (78,851) (40,722)  

Advances from subsidiaries

  7,660          (7,660)    

Other liabilities

  7,347  75,247  855  1,907  1,808  77,629  (1,907) 162,886 

Other liabilities—intercompany

  9,172  10,213  232  833  332  (19,949) (833)  
                  

Total liabilities

 $228,445 $546,246 $139,622 $52,036 $67,987 $812,148 $(52,036)$1,794,448 
                  

Citigroup stockholders' equity

  141,630  7,819  3,698  5,404  5,313  132,594  (154,828) 141,630 

Noncontrolling interest

    475        1,917    2,392 
                  

Total equity

 $141,630 $8,294 $3,698 $5,404 $5,313 $134,511 $(154,828)$144,022 
                  

Total liabilities and equity

 $370,075 $554,540 $$143,320 $57,440 $73,300 $946,659 $(206,864)$1,938,470 
                  
 
 Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries,
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Revenues

                         

Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

 $35 $ $ $ $ $ $(35)$ 

Interest revenue

 $177 $4,199 $1 $3,206 $3,659 $32,218 $(3,206)$40,254 

Interest revenue—intercompany

  1,356  2,169  2,090  (1,643) 229  (5,844) 1,643   

Interest expense

  4,212  1,416  965  46  219  7,687  (46) 14,499 

Interest expense—intercompany

  (530) 1,800  439  (535) 865  (2,574) 535   
                  

Net interest revenue

 $(2,149)$3,152 $687 $2,052 $2,804 $21,261 $(2,052)$25,755 
                  

Commissions and fees

 $ $3,482 $ $22 $59 $4,527 $(22)$8,068 

Commissions and fees—intercompany

    59    35  44  (103) (35)  

Principal transactions

  117  (1,129) (259)     6,972    5,701 

Principal transactions—intercompany

  (221) 3,910  (59)   (86) (3,544)    

Other income

  4,672  12,620  75  209  347  (2,748) (209) 14,966 

Other income—intercompany

  (4,391) (35) (61) 2  32  4,455  (2)  
                  

Total non-interest revenues

 $177 $18,907 $(304)$268 $396 $9,559 $(268)$28,735 
                  

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $(1,937)$22,059 $383 $2,320 $3,200 $30,820 $(2,355)$54,490 
                  

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $ $38 $ $1,938 $2,169 $20,776 $(1,938)$22,983 
                  

Expenses

                         

Compensation and benefits

 $(45)$3,673 $ $259 $335 $8,631 $(259)$12,594 

Compensation and benefits— intercompany

  3  335    71  71  (409) (71)  

Other expense

  408  1,328  1  189  262  9,091  (189) 11,090 

Other expense—intercompany

  97  340  5  273  305  (747) (273)  
                  

Total operating expenses

 $463 $5,676 $6 $792 $973 $16,566 $(792)$23,684 
                  

Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

 $(2,400)$16,345 $377 $(410)$58 $(6,522)$375 $7,823 

Income taxes (benefits)

  (1,045) 6,164  115  (148) 15  (3,507) 148  1,742 

Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

  7,227            (7,227)  
                  

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $5,872 $10,181 $262 $(262)$43 $(3,015)$(7,000)$6,081 

Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

            (259)   (259)
                  

Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $5,872 $10,181 $262 $(262)$43 $(3,274)$(7,000)$5,822 
                  

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

    (51)       1    (50)
                  

Citigroup's net income (loss)

 $5,872 $10,232 $262 $(262)$43 $(3,275)$(7,000)$5,872 
                  

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

 
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
Consolidated
 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

 $(1,854)$18,928 $2,185 $3,312 $3,757 $(36,850)$(3,312)$(13,834)
                  

Cash flows from investing activities

                         

Change in loans

 $ $ $(9,324)$1,528 $1,504 $(119,841)$(1,528)$(127,661)

Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

    163        185,279    185,442 

Purchases of investments

  (13,777) (13)   (531) (579) (152,746) 531  (167,115)

Proceeds from sales of investments

  6,892      398  435  59,563  (398) 66,890 

Proceeds from maturities of investments

  20,209      230  309  69,700  (230) 90,218 

Changes in investments and advances—intercompany

  (20,968)     (290) 4,202  16,766  290   

Business acquisitions

                 

Other investing activities

    (775)       (42,291)   (43,066)
                  

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 $(7,644)$(625)$(9,324)$1,335 $5,871 $16,430 $(1,335)$4,708 
                  

Cash flows from financing activities

                         

Dividends paid

 $(3,235)$ $ $ $ $ $  (3,235)

Dividends paid—intercompany

  (122) (1,000)       1,122     

Issuance of common stock

                 

Issuance of preferred stock

                 

Treasury stock acquired

  (3)             (3)

Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net

  12,235  (2,406) 14,020  (537) (1,985) (15,250) 537  6,614 

Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—intercompany, net

    (14,450)   (2,854) (2,202) 16,652  2,854   

Change in deposits

            58,418    58,418 

Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party

  (1,339) (4,181) (20,932) (1,225) (226) (29,465) 1,225  (56,143)

Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany

  2,081  3,583  14,056    (5,154) (14,566)    

Capital contributions from parent

                 

Other financing activities

  (116)   (5)   (41) 46    (116)
                  

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 $9,501 $(18,454)$7,139 $(4,616)$(9,608)$16,957 $4,616 $5,535 
                  

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks

 $         $582   $582 
                  

Net cash used in discontinued operations

 $         $238   $238 
                  

Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

 $3 $(151)$ $31 $20 $(2,643)$(31)$(2,771)

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

  13  4,557  1  290  396  24,286  (290) 29,253 
                  

Cash and due from banks at end of period

 $16 $4,406 $1 $321 $416 $21,643 $(321)$26,482 
                  

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

                         

Cash paid during the year for:

                         

Income taxes

 $613 $(743)$422 $96 $381 $(1,924)$(96)$(1,251)

Interest

  6,190  6,006  2,232  2,454  469  6,441  (2,454) 21,338 

Non-cash investing activities:

                         

Transfers to repossessed assets

 $ $ $ $1,217 $1,261 $888 $(1,217)$2,149 
                  
 
 June 30, 2010 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Assets

                         

Cash and due from banks

 $ $2,011 $ $202 $268 $22,430 $(202)$24,709 

Cash and due from banks—intercompany

  6  2,816  1  144  168  (2,991) (144)  

Federal funds sold and resale agreements

    187,987        42,797    230,784 

Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany

    17,696        (17,696)    

Trading account assets

  18  138,077      18  171,299    309,412 

Trading account assets—intercompany

  58  7,312  31      (7,401)    

Investments

  10,413  198    2,455  2,550  303,905  (2,455) 317,066 

Loans, net of unearned income

    396    35,996  41,219  650,551  (35,996) 692,166 

Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany

      82,130  3,525  7,992  (90,122) (3,525)  

Allowance for loan losses

    (42)   (3,468) (3,818) (42,337) 3,468  (46,197)
                  

Total loans, net

 $ $354 $82,130 $36,053 $45,393 $518,092 $(36,053)$645,969 

Advances to subsidiaries

  137,718          (137,718)    

Investments in subsidiaries

  205,029            (205,029)  

Other assets

  18,353  70,693  683  9,127  10,068  309,919  (9,127) 409,716 

Other assets—intercompany

  13,807  33,963  2,292  6  1,718  (51,780) (6)  
                  

Total assets

 $385,402 $461,107 $85,137 $47,987 $60,183 $1,150,856 $(253,016)$1,937,656 
                  

Liabilities and equity

                         

Deposits

 $ $ $ $ $ $813,951 $ $813,951 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold

    151,947        44,165    196,112 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany

  185  7,204        (7,389)    

Trading account liabilities

    78,199  94      52,708    131,001 

Trading account liabilities—intercompany

  56  5,249  174      (5,479)    

Short-term borrowings

  19  3,388  11,730    656  76,959    92,752 

Short-term borrowings—intercompany

    56,938  17,240  8,297  2,941  (77,119) (8,297)  

Long-term debt

  188,756  10,352  51,975  1,297  4,724  157,490  (1,297) 413,297 

Long-term debt—intercompany

  354  58,205  1,829  29,512  42,499  (102,887) (29,512)  

Advances from subsidiaries

  26,590          (26,590)    

Other liabilities

  7,756  60,507  336  3,034  3,007  61,607  (3,034) 133,213 

Other liabilities—intercompany

  6,880  12,904  117  1,031  490  (20,391) (1,031)  
                  

Total liabilities

 $230,596 $444,893 $83,495 $43,171 $54,317 $967,025 $(43,171)$1,780,326 
                  

Citigroup stockholders' equity

  154,806  15,785  1,642  4,816  5,866  181,736  (209,845) 154,806 

Noncontrolling interest

    429        2,095    2,524 
                  

Total equity

 $154,806 $16,214 $1,642 $4,816 $5,866 $183,831 $(209,845)$157,330 
                  

Total liabilities and equity

 $385,402 $461,107 $85,137 $47,987 $60,183 $1,150,856 $(253,016)$1,937,656 
                  

Table of Contents

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSCondensed Consolidating Balance Sheet

 
 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
Consolidated
 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities of continuing operations

 $(1,519)$4,587 $1,981 $3,232 $2,920 $90,977 $(3,232)$98,946 
                  

Cash flows from investing activities

                         

Change in loans

 $ $67 $1,379 $(3,434)$(2,003)$(187,302) 3,434 $(187,859)

Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

    91        203,772    203,863 

Purchases of investments

  (167,093) (134)   (945) (1,142) (104,446) 945  (272,815)

Proceeds from sales of investments

  11,727      208  473  48,055  (208) 60,255 

Proceeds from maturities of investments

  137,005    2  475  584  56,721  (475) 194,312 

Changes in investments and advances—intercompany

  (20,954)     (1,054) 913  20,041  1,054   

Business acquisitions

                 

Other investing activities

    (19,046)       23,253    4,207 
                  

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 $(39,315)$(19,022)$1,381 $(4,750)$(1,175)$60,094 $4,750 $1,963 
                  

Cash flows from financing activities

                         

Dividends paid

 $(6,008)$ $ $ $ $ $ $(6,008)

Dividends paid-intercompany

  (180) (84)       264     

Issuance of common stock

  4,961              4,961 

Issuance/(Redemptions) of preferred stock

  27,424              27,424 

Treasury stock acquired

  (6)         (1)   (7)

Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net

  14,608  (9,068) 6,188  (720) (2,223) (36,267) 720  (26,762)

Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—intercompany, net

    23,322    (1,513) (2,181) (21,141) 1,513   

Change in deposits

            (32,411)   (32,411)

Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party

  (3,196) (5,269) (9,096)   (105) (23,967)   (41,633)

Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany

  3,622  4,873  (448) 3,724  2,721  (10,768) (3,724)  

Capital contributions from parent

      (1)     1     

Other financing activities

  (377)             (377)
                  

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 $40,848 $13,774 $(3,357)$1,491 $(1,788)$(124,290)$(1,491)$(74,813)
                  

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks

 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,105)$ $(1,105)
                  

Net cash from discontinued operations

 $ $ $ $ $ $(171)$ $(171)
                  

Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

 $14 $(661)$5 $(27)$(43)$25,505 $27 $24,820 

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

  19  5,297  2  321  440  32,448  (321) 38,206 
                  

Cash and due from banks at end of period

 $33 $4,636 $7 $294 $397 $57,953  (294)$63,026 
                  

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

                         

Cash paid during the year for:

                         

Income taxes

 $339 $(2,867)$261 $304 $261 $4,129 $(304)$2,123 

Interest

  7,083  14,582  2,916  1,428  252  19,461  (1,428) 44,294 

Non-cash investing activities:

                         

Transfers to repossessed assets

 $ $ $ $1,108 $1,148 $1,426 $(1,108)$2,574 
                  
 
 December 31, 2009 
In millions of dollars
 Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
consolidated
 

Assets

                         

Cash and due from banks

 $ $1,801 $ $198 $297 $23,374 $(198)$25,472 

Cash and due from banks—intercompany

  5  3,146  1  145  168  (3,320) (145)  

Federal funds sold and resale agreements

    199,760        22,262    222,022 

Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany

    20,626        (20,626)    

Trading account assets

  26  140,777  71    17  201,882    342,773 

Trading account assets—intercompany

  196  6,812  788      (7,796)    

Investments

  13,318  237    2,293  2,506  290,058  (2,293) 306,119 

Loans, net of unearned income

    248    42,739  48,821  542,435  (42,739) 591,504 

Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany

      129,317  3,387  7,261  (136,578) (3,387)  

Allowance for loan losses

    (83)   (3,680) (4,056) (31,894) 3,680  (36,033)
                  

Total loans, net

 $ $165 $129,317 $42,446 $52,026 $373,963 $(42,446)$555,471 

Advances to subsidiaries

  144,497          (144,497)    

Investments in subsidiaries

  210,895            (210,895)  

Other assets

  14,196  69,907  1,186  6,440  7,317  312,183  (6,440) 404,789 

Other assets—intercompany

  10,412  38,047  3,168  47  1,383  (53,010) (47)  
                  

Total assets

 $393,545 $481,278 $134,531 $51,569 $63,714 $994,473 $(262,464)$1,856,646 
                  

Liabilities and equity

                         

Deposits

 $ $ $ $ $ $835,903 $ $835,903 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold

    124,522        29,759    154,281 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany

  185  18,721        (18,906)    

Trading account liabilities

    82,905  115      54,492    137,512 

Trading account liabilities—intercompany

  198  7,495  1,082      (8,775)    

Short-term borrowings

  1,177  4,593  10,136    379  52,594    68,879 

Short-term borrowings—intercompany

    69,306  62,336  3,304  33,818  (165,460) (3,304)  

Long-term debt

  197,804  13,422  55,499  2,893  7,542  89,752  (2,893) 364,019 

Long-term debt—intercompany

  367  62,050  1,039  37,600  14,278  (77,734) (37,600)  

Advances from subsidiaries

  30,275          (30,275)    

Other liabilities

  5,985  70,477  585  1,772  1,742  62,290  (1,772) 141,079 

Other liabilities—intercompany

  4,854  7,911  198  1,080  386  (13,349) (1,080)  
                  

Total liabilities

 $240,845 $461,402 $130,990 $46,649 $58,145 $810,291 $(46,649)$1,701,673 
                  

Citigroup stockholders' equity

  152,700  19,448  3,541  4,920  5,569  182,337  (215,815) 152,700 

Noncontrolling interest

    428        1,845    2,273 
                  

Total equity

 $152,700 $19,876 $3,541 $4,920 $5,569 $184,182 $(215,815)$154,973 
                  

Total liabilities and equity

 $393,545 $481,278 $134,531 $51,569 $63,714 $994,473 $(262,464)$1,856,646 
                  

Table of Contents


Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

 
 Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
Consolidated
 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 $3,845 $20,709 $1,277 $(3,652)$(3,356)$19,126 $3,652 $41,601 
                  

Cash flows from investing activities

                         

Change in loans

 $ $32 $47,497 $7,382 $8,040 $(255)$(7,382)$55,314 

Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

    68    126  126  3,558  (126) 3,752 

Purchases of investments

  (2,796) (4)   (342) (348) (197,699) 342  (200,847)

Proceeds from sales of investments

  874  32    109  220  77,857  (109) 78,983 

Proceeds from maturities of investments

  5,079      143  152  90,575  (143) 95,806 

Changes in investments and advances—intercompany

  2,643  3,475    (138) (731) (5,387) 138   

Business acquisitions

  (20)         20     

Other investing activities

    588        6,682    7,270 
                  

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 $5,780 $4,191 $47,497 $7,280 $7,459 $(24,649)$(7,280)$40,278 
                  

Cash flows from financing activities

                         

Dividends paid

 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 

Dividends paid-intercompany

    (5,500) (1,500)     7,000     

Issuance of common stock

                 

Issuance of preferred stock

                 

Treasury stock acquired

  (5)             (5)

Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net

  (6,821) (2,065) (3,773) (530) (1,752) (14,201) 530  (28,612)

Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt-intercompany, net

    (3,882)   (8,088) (2,279) 6,161  8,088   

Change in deposits

            (21,952)   (21,952)

Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party

  11  (1,205) 1,734    277  (34,044)   (33,227)

Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany

  (3,960) (12,368) (45,235) 4,993  (377) 61,940  (4,993)  

Capital contributions from parent

                 

Other financing activities

  1,151              1,151 
                  

Net cash used in financing activities

 $(9,624)$(25,020)$(48,774)$(3,625)$(4,131)$4,904 $3,625 $(82,645)
                  

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks

 $ $ $ $ $ $(48)$ $(48)
                  

Net cash provided by discontinued operations

 $ $ $ $ $ $51 $ $51 
                  

Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

 $1 $(120)$ $3 $(28)$(616)$(3)$(763)

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

  5  4,947  1  343  464  20,055  (343) 25,472 
                  

Cash and due from banks at end of period

 $6 $4,827 $1 $346 $436 $19,439 $(346)$24,709 
                  

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

                         

Cash paid during the year for:

                         

Income taxes

 $(308)$117 $259 $(142)$181 $2,520 $142 $2,769 

Interest

  4,703  2,430  642  1,145  781  3,545  (1,145) 12,101 

Non-cash investing activities:

                         

Transfers to repossessed assets

 $ $193 $ $683 $714 $591 $(683)$1,498 
                  

Table of Contents

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows

 
 Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 
In millions of dollars Citigroup
parent
company
 CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
Citigroup
subsidiaries
and
eliminations
 Consolidating
adjustments
 Citigroup
Consolidated
 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

 $(3,928)$21,483 $2,262 $2,226 $2,008 $(42,252)$(2,226)$(20,427)
                  

Cash flows from investing activities

                         

Change in loans

 $ $ $(11,257)$1,081 $1,175 $(76,652)$(1,081)$(86,734)

Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

    163        126,871    127,034 

Purchases of investments

  (12,895) (13)   (401) (431) (107,022) 401  (120,361)

Proceeds from sales of investments

  6,892      159  191  40,358  (159) 47,441 

Proceeds from maturities of investments

  19,559      185  216  37,761  (185) 57,536 

Changes in investments and advances—intercompany

  (12,386)     (1,960) 4,374  8,012  1,960   

Business acquisitions

                 

Other investing activities

    (4,104)       (4,355)   (8,459)
                  

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 $1,170 $(3,954)$(11,257)$(936)$5,525 $24,973 $936 $16,457 
                  

Cash flows from financing activities

                         

Dividends paid

 $(2,539)$ $ $ $ $ $  (2,539)

Dividends paid-intercompany

  (119)         119     

Issuance of common stock

                 

Issuance of preferred stock

                 

Treasury stock acquired

  (2)             (2)

Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net

  4,231  (1,515) 6,975  (450) (1,416) (14,722) 450  (6,447)

Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt-intercompany, net

    (14,241)   (7,242) (1,994) 16,235  7,242   

Change in deposits

            30,552    30,552 

Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party

    (4,099) (2,372) 6,406  (152) (13,874) (6,406) (20,497)

Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany

  1,304  1,617  4,397    (3,974) (3,344)    

Capital contributions from parent

                 

Other financing activities

  (108)   (5)     5    (108)
                  

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 $2,767 $(18,238)$8,995 $(1,286)$(7,536)$14,971 $1,286 $959 
                  

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks

 $         $171   $171 
                  

Net cash provided by discontinued operations

 $         $502   $502 
                  

Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

 $9 $(709)$ $4 $(3)$(1,635)$(4)$(2,338)

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

  13  4,557  1  290  396  24,286  (290) 29,253 
                  

Cash and due from banks at end of period

 $22 $3,848 $1 $294 $393 $22,651 $(294)$26,915 
                  

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

                         

Cash paid during the year for:

                         

Income taxes

 $(36)$(522)$280 $(172)$193 $(500)$172 $(585)

Interest

  4,282  4,448  1,641  1,893  408  4,305  (1,893) 15,084 

Non-cash investing activities:

                         

Transfers to repossessed assets

 $ $ $ $779 $806 $557 $(779)$1,363 
                  

Table of Contents


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

        The following information supplements and amends our discussion set forth under Part I, Item 3 "Legal Proceedings" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008,2009 (2009 Form 10-K), as updated by our Quarterly ReportsReport on Form 10-Q for the quartersquarter ended March 31, 2009 and June 30, 2009.2010.

Subprime Mortgage—RelatedCredit-Crisis-Related Litigation and Other Matters

        As discussed at pages 263-265 of our 2009 Form 10-K, Citigroup and its affiliates continue to defend lawsuits and arbitrations asserting claims for damages and other relief for losses arising from the global financial credit and subprime-mortgage crisis that began in 2007. These actions, which assert a variety of claims under federal and state law, include, among other matters, class actions brought on behalf of putative classes of investors in various securities issued by Citigroup as well as actions asserted by individual investors and counterparties to various transactions, and are pending in various state and federal courts as well as before arbitration tribunals. These actions are at various procedural stages of litigation.

        In addition to these litigations and arbitrations, Citigroup continues to cooperate fully in response to subpoenas and requests for information from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other government agencies in connection with various formal and informal inquiries concerning Citigroup's subprime-mortgage-related conduct and business activities, as well as other business activities affected by the credit crisis. On July 29, 2010, the SEC announced the settlement of an investigation into certain of Citigroup's 2007 disclosures concerning its subprime-related business activities. In connection with the settlement, Citigroup agreed to pay a civil penalty in the amount of $75 million. The settlement is subject to court approval.

        In accordance with ASC 450 (formerly SFAS 5), Citigroup establishes accruals for all litigation and regulatory matters, including matters related to the credit crisis, when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, accruals are adjusted from time to time, as appropriate, in light of additional information. The amount of loss ultimately incurred in relation to those matters may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those matters.

        Certain of these matters assert claims for substantial or indeterminate damages. The claims asserted in these matters typically are broad, often spanning a multi-year period and sometimes a wide range of business activities, and the plaintiffs' alleged damages typically are not quantified or factually supported in the complaint. The most significant of these matters remains in very preliminary stages, with few or no substantive legal decisions by the court or tribunal defining the scope of the claims, the class (if any), or the potentially available damages, and fact discovery is still in progress or not yet begun. In many of these matters, Citigroup has not yet answered the complaint or asserted its defenses. For all these reasons, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, for these matters or predict the timing of their eventual resolution.

        Subject to the foregoing, it is the opinion of Citigroup's management, based on current knowledge and after taking into account available insurance coverage and its current accruals, that the eventual outcome of these matters would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of Citi. Nonetheless, given the inherent unpredictability of litigation and the substantial or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters, an adverse outcome in certain of these matters could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on Citi's consolidated results of operations or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods.

Subprime-Mortgage-Related Litigation and Other Matters

        Securities Actions.Actions:    On July 22, 2009, plaintiffs in BRECHER, ET AL. v. CGMI, ET AL. voluntarily dismissed the claims against the individual defendants and moved to remand the remaining action against Citigroup, CGMI, and the Personnel and Compensation Committee to state court. On September 8, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ordered that defendants show cause as to why there was federal jurisdiction over the case. On September 17, 2009, defendants responded to12, 2010, the district court's order.

        On August 7, 2009,court issued an order and opinion granting in part and denying in part defendants' motion to dismiss the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred BRECHER, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. to the Southern District of New York for coordination withconsolidated class action complaint in IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIESBOND LITIGATION.

        On August 19, 2009, KOCH, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL., In this action, lead plaintiffs assert claims on behalf of a putative class action, was filedof purchasers of forty-eight corporate debt securities, preferred stock, and interests in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California on behalf of participants in Citigroup's Voluntary FA Capital Accumulation Program ("FA CAP Program") against various defendants, includingpreferred stock issued by Citigroup and CGMI, assertingrelated issuers over a two-year period from 2006 to 2008. The court's order, among other things, dismissed plaintiffs' claims under Section 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 but denied defendants' motion to dismiss certain claims under Section 11 of that Act. A motion for partial reconsideration of the Securities Exchange Actlatter ruling is pending. Fact discovery has not yet begun, a class certification motion has not yet been filed, and plaintiffs have not yet quantified the putative class's alleged damages. Because of 1934,the preliminary stage of the proceedings, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, for this action or predict the timing of its eventual resolution. Additional information relating to this action is publicly available in court filings under the consolidated lead docket number 08 Civ. 9522 (S.D.N.Y.) (Stein, J.).

        Subprime Counterparty and Minnesota state lawInvestor Actions:    On June 7, 2010, in connection with a global settlement agreement between Ambac and Citigroup, the parties stipulated to a discontinuation with prejudice of a lawsuit brought by Ambac Credit Products LLC.

Lehman Structured Notes Matters

        In Turkey, Hungary and Greece, Citigroup has made a settlement offer to all eligible purchasers of notes distributed by Citigroup in those countries. A significant majority of the eligible purchasers have accepted this offer.

        In Belgium, the criminal trial against a Citigroup subsidiary, two current employees and one former employee has been completed. The court is scheduled to deliver its judgment on December 1, 2010. The Public Prosecutor seeks a monetary penalty of approximately 132 million Euro.

Research Analyst Litigation

        On June 23, 2010, the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the remaining claims in HOLMES v. GRUBMAN.


Table of Contents

Cash Balance Plan Litigation

        On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court denied plaintiffs' petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the Second Circuit's decision.

Terra Firma Litigation

        Plaintiffs, general partners of two related private equity funds, filed a complaint in New York state court against certain Citigroup entities in December 2009, alleging that 21/2 years earlier, during the May 2007 auction of the music company EMI, Citigroup, as advisor to EMI and as a potential lender to plaintiffs' acquisition vehicle Maltby, fraudulently or negligently orally misrepresented the intentions of another potential bidder regarding the auction. Plaintiffs allege that but for the oral misrepresentations Maltby would not have acquired EMI for approximately £4 billion. Plaintiffs further allege that, following the acquisition of EMI, certain securities throughCitigroup entities have tortiously interfered with plaintiffs' business relationship with EMI. Plaintiffs seek billions of dollars in damages. Citigroup believes it has strong factual and legal defenses to the FA CAP Program. On September 30, 2009,claims asserted by plaintiffs, including that no misrepresentation occurred, plaintiffs did not rely on the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation conditionally transferred KOCHalleged misrepresentation in making their multi-billion-dollar investment in EMI, Citigroup has properly exercised its legal rights as a lender in relation to the approximately £2.5 billion of financing it provided Maltby, and plaintiffs suffered no damages. Because, among other reasons, the parties have widely divergent views of the merits, and they have not yet briefed either summary judgment motions that may resolve the matter in whole or significant part or motions in limine that may limit the testimony a jury would hear at trial, including as to damages, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, for this action. The case, captioned TERRA FIRMA INVESTMENTS (GP) 2 LIMITED, et al., v. CITIGROUP, INC., et al., was removed to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, as a potential tag-along to IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. Onwhere it is currently pending under docket number 09-cv-10459 (JSR). Additional information regarding the action is publicly available in court filings under that docket number. Trial is scheduled for October 8, 2009, a consolidated amended complaint was filed in BRECHER, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting claims under the federal securities laws and Minnesota and California state law. The complaint purports to consolidate the similar claims asserted in KOCH.

        On August 31, 2009, ASHER, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. and PELLEGRINI, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. were consolidated with IN RE CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION.

        On October 14, 2009, INTERNATIONAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A., ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. was filed by several foreign investment funds and fund management companies and the City of Richmond in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting, among other claims, claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against various defendants, including Citigroup and several current and former Citigroup executives. The claims asserted in this action are similar to those asserted in IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION.2010.

        Derivative Actions.    On August 25, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed without prejudice the complaint in IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION for failure to make a pre-suit demand on the Board of Directors and failure to plead demand futility. On September 18, 2009, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint.Asset Repurchase Matters

        Citigroup has received letters on behalf of purported shareholders demanding that the Board of Directors take remedial action, including the filing of legal claims, with respect to certain of the matters alleged in the subprime mortgage—related securities and derivative litigations, among other matters. The Board has formed a committee to consider the demands asserted in the letters.

        ERISA Actions.    On August 31, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the complaint in IN RE CITIGROUP ERISA LITIGATION for failure to state a claim that defendants breached their fiduciary duties by offering Citigroup stock as an investment option in the ERISA plans and entered judgment in favor of defendants. On September 8, 2009, plaintiffs appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

        Other Matters.    Underwriting Actions.American Home Mortgage. On July 27, 2009, UTAH RETIREMENT SYSTEMS v. STRAUSS, ET AL. was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York asserting, among other claims, claims under the Securities Act of 1933 and Utah state law arising out of an offering of American Home Mortgage common stock underwritten by CGMI.

        On July 31, 2009, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York entered an order preliminarily approving settlements reached with all defendants (including Citigroup and CGMI) in IN RE AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SECURITIES LITIGATION.

        AIG.    On August 5, 2009, the underwriter defendants, including CGMI and CGML, moved to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint in IN RE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. 2008 SECURITIES LITIGATION.

        Discrimination in Lending Actions. On September 21, 2009, the United States District Court for the Central District of California denied defendant CitiMortgage's motion for summary judgment and granted its motion to strike the jury demand in NAACP v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE CO., ET AL.

        Public Nuisance and Related Actions. On August 7, 2009, the City of Cleveland dismissed, without prejudice, its claims against CitiFinancial and CitiMortgage in CITY OF CLEVELAND v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ET AL.


Table of Contents

        Counterparty Actions. On October 7, 2009, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in AMBAC CREDIT PRODUCTS, LLC v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL.

        Governmental and Regulatory Matters.    Citigroup and certain of its affiliates and current and former employees are subject to formal and informal investigations, as well as subpoenas and/or requests for information, from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies relating to subprime mortgage—related activities. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully and are engaged in efforts to resolve certain of these matters.

Auction Rate Securities—Related Litigation and Other Matters

        Securities Actions.    On July 23, 2009, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order transferring K-V PHARMACEUTICAL CO. v. CGMI from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for coordination with IN RE CITIGROUP AUCTION RATE SECURITIES LITIGATION. On August 24, 2009, CGMI moved to dismiss the complaint.

        On September 11, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed without prejudice the complaint in IN RE CITIGROUP AUCTION RATE SECURITIES LITIGATION. On October 15, 2009, lead plaintiff filed a second consolidated amended complaint asserting claims under Sections 10 and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

        On October 2, 2009, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred OCWEN FINANCIAL CORP., ET AL. v. CGMI to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for coordination with IN RE CITIGROUP AUCTION RATE SECURITIES LITIGATION.

        Derivative Actions.    On September 10, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed without prejudice the complaint in LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. PANDIT, ET AL. for failure to make a pre-suit demand on the Board of Directors and failure to plead demand futility. On September 16, 2009, Citigroup received a letter on behalf of plaintiff demanding that the Board of Directors take remedial action, including the filing of legal claims, with respect to the matters alleged in the dismissed complaint. The Board has formed a committee to consider the demands asserted in the letter. On September 23, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the district court's order of dismissal.

        Governmental and Regulatory Actions.    Citigroup and certain of its affiliates and current and former employees are subject to formal and informal investigations, as well as subpoenas and/or requests for information, from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies relating to auction rate securities. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully and are engaged in discussions on these matters.

Falcon and ASTA/MAT-Related Litigation and Other Matters

        ECA Acquisitions, Inc., et al. v. MAT Three LLC, et al.    On September 14, 2009, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint.

        Governmental and Regulatory Matters.    Citigroup and certain of its affiliates are subject to formal and informal investigations, as well as subpoenas and/or requests for information, from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies relating to the marketing and management of the Falcon and ASTA/MAT funds. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully and are engaged in discussions on these matters.

Adelphia Communications Corporation

        Trial of the Adelphia Recovery Trust's claims against Citigroup and numerous other defendants is scheduled to begin in April 2010.

IPO Securities Litigation

        In October 2009, the District Court entered an order granting final approval of the settlement.

Other Matters

        Destiny Litigations.    On June 9 and 12, 2009, two actions—DESTINY USA HOLDINGS, LLC v. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS REALTY CORP. and CONGEL, ET. AL. v. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS REALTY CORP.—were filed in New York State Supreme Court, Onondaga County, against Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (CGMRC), respectively relating to CGMRC's issuance of Deficiency and Default Notices (the "Notices") pursuant to a construction loan agreement with Destiny USA Holdings, LLC (Destiny). Destiny seeks declaratory and injunctive relief and damages for CGMRC's alleged breach of the loan agreement. On July 17, 2009, the court granted Destiny's motion for a preliminary injunction, vacated the Notices, and directed CGMRC to pay all sums due under Destiny's existing funding requests and to pay all future sums due as requested under the loan agreement. That order has been stayed pending the outcome of CGMRC's state court appeal.

        Investor Actions.    Investors in municipal bonds and other instruments affected by the collapse of the credit markets have sued Citigroup on a variety of theories. On August 10, 2009, certain such investors, a Norwegian securities firm and seven Norwegian municipalities, filed an action—TERRA SECURITIES ASA KONKURSBO, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL.—in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Citigroup, CGMI and Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC, asserting claims under Sections 10 and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and state law arising out of the municipalities' investment in certain notes. On October 7, 2009, defendants filed a motion to dismiss.

        Japan Regulatory Matters.Beginning in late 2008,March 2010, various regulators have made inquiries regarding the accounting treatment of certain repurchase transactions. Citigroup affiliates received requests for information from Japanese regulators relating to the accuracy of their large shareholding reporting in Japan. These Citigroup affiliates areis cooperating fully with such requests and, among other things, in the third quarter of 2009 filed approximately 900 public reports in Japan correcting and supplementing previous large


Table of Contentsthese inquiries.

shareholding reports. Administrative fines and other penalties may be imposed against these Citigroup affiliates.


        Lehman Brothers—Structured Notes.    Retail customers outside of the United States continue to file, and threaten to file, claims for the loss in value of their investments. There are currently 99 civil actions pending in six European countries related to the distribution of Lehman structured notes. The first court hearing in the Belgian criminal case (in which more than 1300 customers are expected to file as civil complainants seeking compensation) is expected to take place on December 1, 2009. A criminal investigation has begun in Poland, and the criminal investigations in Greece continue. Scrutiny by regulatory authorities outside of the United States is ongoing, and there have been a number of adverse regulatory findings.

        Pension Plan Litigation.    On October 19, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs and dismissed plaintiffs' complaint. The Second Circuit held that Citigroup's pension plan did not violate ERISA's minimum benefit accrual rules and that there had been no violation of ERISA's notice requirements.

        W.R. Huff Asset Management Co., LLC v. Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., L.P.    On August 6, 2009, the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, granted defendant Robinson Humphrey Co. LLC's motion to strike the Fourth Amended Complaint on statute of limitations grounds, thereby dismissing Robinson Humphrey Co. LLC from the case. On August 25, 2009, the case was consolidated for discovery purposes, but not for trial, with the related case against Salomon Brothers, Inc., 27001 PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. v. BT SECURITIES CORP., ET AL. Trial in the 27001 PARTNERSHIP action remains scheduled to commence in February 2010. On September 18, 2009, defendants Salomon Brothers, Inc. and Chemical Securities, Inc. moved for summary judgment, and plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment.

Settlement Payments

        Any paymentsPayments required by Citigroup or its affiliates in connection with the settlement agreements described above either have been made or are covered by existing litigation reserves.accruals. Additional lawsuits containing claims similar to those described above may be filed in the future.


Table of Contents

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

        There are no material changes fromFor a discussion of the risk factors set forth underaffecting Citigroup, see "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our1A of Citi's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.2009.


Table of Contents

Item 2.    UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

        None.

(c)   Share Repurchases

        Under its long-standing repurchase program, the CompanyCitigroup may buy back common shares in the market or otherwise from time to time. This program may beis used for many purposes, including to offsetoffsetting dilution from stock-based compensation programs.

        The following table summarizes the Company'sCitigroup's share repurchases during the first ninesix months of 2009:2010:

In millions, except per share amounts Total shares purchased(1) Average price paid per share Approximate
dollar value of
shares that may
yet be purchased
under the plans or
programs
 

First quarter 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.2 $3.03 $6,741 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  10.7  3.56  N/A 
        

Total first quarter 2009

  10.9 $3.55 $6,741 
        

Second quarter 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.2 $3.27 $6,740 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  4.4  3.67  N/A 
        

Total second quarter 2009

  4.6 $3.65 $6,740 
        

July 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.4 $3.09 $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  1.1  3.08  N/A 

August 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

   $ $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  0.1  3.66  N/A 

September 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.1 $4.67 $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  0.1  4.52  N/A 
        

Third quarter 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.5 $3.21 $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  1.3  3.22  N/A 
        

Total third quarter 2009

  1.8 $3.22 $6,739 
        

Year-to-date 2009

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

  0.9 $3.18 $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  16.4  3.56  N/A 
        

Total year-to-date 2009

  17.3 $3.54 $6,739 
        
In millions, except per share amounts Total shares
purchased(1)
 Average
price paid
per share
 Approximate dollar
value of shares that
may yet be purchased
under the plan or
programs
 

First quarter 2010

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

   $ $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  12.5  3.57  N/A 
        

Total first quarter 2010

  12.5 $3.57 $6,739 
        

April 2010

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

   $ $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  120.9  4.93  N/A 

May 2010

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

   $ $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

      N/A 

June 2010

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

   $ $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  0.3  4.09  N/A 
        

Second quarter 2010

          
 

Open market repurchases(1)

   $ $6,739 
 

Employee transactions(2)

  121.2  4.93  N/A 
        

Total second quarter 2010

  121.2 $4.93 $6,739 
        

Year-to-date 2010

          
        
 

Open market repurchases(1)

   $ $6,739 
        
 

Employee transactions(2)

  133.7  4.80  N/A 
        

Total year-to-date 2010

  133.7 $4.80 $6,739 
        

(1)
All openOpen market repurchases werewould be transacted under an existing authorized share repurchase plan. On April 17, 2006,Since 2000, the Board of Directors has authorized up to an additional $10 billion in share repurchases. Shares repurchasedthe repurchase of shares in the first, second and third quartersaggregate amount of 2009 relate to customer fails/errors.$40 billion under Citi's existing share repurchase plan.

(2)
Consists of shares added to treasury stock related to activity on employee stock option program exercises, where the employee delivers existing shares to cover the option exercise, or under the Company'sCiti's employee restricted or deferred stock program, where shares are withheld to satisfy tax requirements.

N/A    Not applicable.applicable

        In accordance with the recent exchange agreements with the USG, the Company agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $0.01 per share per quarter forFor so long as the USGU.S. government holds any debtCitigroup common stock or trust preferred securities, Citigroup has generally agreed not to acquire, repurchase or redeem any Citigroup equity security of Citigroup (or any affiliate thereof) acquired by the USG in connectionor trust preferred securities, other than pursuant to administrating its employee benefit plans or other customary exceptions, or with the public and private exchange offers, without the consent of the USG. Any dividend on Citi's outstanding common stock would need to be made in compliance with Citi's obligations to any remaining outstanding preferred stock. In addition, pursuant to various of its agreements with the USG, the Company agreed not to repurchase its common stock subject to certain limited exceptions, including in the ordinary course of business as part of employee benefit programs, without the consent of the USG.U.S. government.


Table of Contents


Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

        On the July 24, 2009 voting deadline for Citigroup's Preferred Proxy Statement dated June 18, 2009, the votes cast on the proposals to amend the Company's restated certificate of incorporation and the certificates of designation of certain series of the Company's preferred stock did not meet the required quorum of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock. As a result, the proposals were not approved.

        Set forth below, with respect to the proposals covered by Citigroup's Preferred Proxy Statement dated June 18, 2009, are the number of votes consenting to approve the proposal, the number of votes withholding consent, and the number of abstentions.

 
  
 CONSENT WITHHOLD
CONSENT
 ABSTAIN 

(1)

 Proposal to eliminate certain requirements with respect to the declaration and payment of dividends on the Company's preferred stock.   1,616,485,022  133,242,379  188,213,673 

(2)

 Proposal to eliminate the right of holders of the Company's preferred stock to elect two directors if dividends on that preferred stock have not been paid.   1,608,466,652  137,116,210  192,358,085 

(3)

 Proposal to clarify that shares of certain series of the Company's preferred stock acquired by the Company will be restored to the status of authorized but unissued shares without designation as to series.   1,134,202,301  607,909,223  195,824,857 

(4)

 Proposal to increase the number of authorized shares of preferred stock from 30 million to 2 billion.   1,105,887,808  629,622,756  192,425,539 

        On September 3, 2009, the Company announced that its common stockholders had approved the three proposed amendments to the Company's restated certificate of incorporation submitted to common stockholders in Citigroup's Common Proxy Statement dated June 18, 2009.

        Set forth below, with respect to the proposals covered by Citigroup's Common Proxy Statement dated June 18, 2009, are the number of votes consenting to approve the proposal, the number of votes withholding consent, and the number of abstentions.

 
  
 CONSENT WITHHOLD
CONSENT
 ABSTAIN 

(1)

 Proposal to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 15 billion to 60 billion shares.   7,056,506,251  188,694,489  26,840,344 

(2)

 Proposal to effect a reverse stock split of the Company's common stock at any time prior to June 30, 2010 at one of seven reverse split ratios, at the sole discretion of the Company's Board of Directors.   8,558,930,213  537,925,274  78,420,206 

(3)

 Proposal to eliminate the voting rights of shares of common stock with respect to any amendment to the Company's restated certificate of incorporation that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of the Company's preferred stock.   6,629,778,336  604,659,624  37,525,290 

Table of Contents


Item 6.    Exhibits

        See Exhibit Index.


Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 6th day of November, 2009.August, 2010.


 

 

CITIGROUP INC.
    (Registrant)

 

 

By

 

/s/ JOHN C. GERSPACH

John C. Gerspach
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

 

 

By

 

/s/ JEFFREY R. WALSH

Jeffrey R. Walsh
Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

Table of Contents


EXHIBIT INDEX

 2.01 Amended and Restated Joint Venture Contribution and Formation Agreement, dated May 29, 2009, by and among Citigroup Inc. (the Company), Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 3, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

 

2.02

 

Share Purchase Agreement, dated May 1, 2009, by and among Nikko Citi Holdings Inc., Nikko Cordial Securities Inc., Nikko Citi Business Services Inc., Nikko Citigroup Limited, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.02 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

 

2.03


Share Purchase Agreement, dated July 11, 2008, by and between Citigroup Global Markets Finance Corporation & Co. Beschrankt Haftende KG, CM Akquisitions GmbH, and Banque Federative du Credit Mutuel S.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.01 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).


3.01

+

Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated Octoberincorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009.2009 (File No. 1-9924).

 

3.02

 

By-Laws of the Company, as amended, effective October 16, 2007,December 15, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 19, 2007December 16, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

 

4.01

 

Warrant, dated October 28, 2008, issued by the Company to the United States Department of the Treasury (the UST), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 30, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).

 

4.02

 

Warrant, dated December 31, 2008, issued by the Company to the UST, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 31, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).

 

4.03

 

Warrant, dated January 15, 2009, issued by the Company to the UST, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 16, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

 

4.04

 

Tax Benefits Preservation Plan, dated June 9, 2009, between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 10, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

 

4.05


Capital Securities Guarantee Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2009, between the Company, as Guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Guarantee Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.03 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 30, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


10.01

+

Equity Distribution Agreement, dated April 26, 2010, among the Company, the UST and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form of 8-K filed April 26, 2010 (File No. 1-9924).


10.02


Citigroup Equity or Deferred Cash Award2009 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended and restated effective April 20, 2010), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed April 22, 2010 (No. 333-166242).


10.03


Letter Agreement, (effective November 1, 2009)dated April 5, 2010, between the Company and Dr. Robert L. Joss, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (File No. 1-9924).

 

12.01

+

Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges.

 

12.02

+

Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges (including preferred stock dividends).

 

31.01

+

Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

31.02

+

Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

32.01

+

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

99.01

+

Residual Value Obligation Certificate.


101.01

+

Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citigroup Inc. for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009,2010, filed on NovemberAugust 6, 2009,2010, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statement of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Balance Sheet, (iii) the





Table of Contents

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text.Statements.

The total amount of securities authorized pursuant to any instrument defining rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company will furnish copies of any such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

+
Filed herewith