Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C.WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

ýQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009

OR

o


TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                             to                              

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

Commission file number 1-9924

Citigroup Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 52-1568099
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

399 Park Avenue, New York, New YorkNY
(Address of principal executive offices)

 

10043
(Zip Code)code)

(212) 559-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:

Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
 Smaller reporting company o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No  ý

        Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:

Common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2009: 22,863,947,261October 31, 2010: 29,050,168,996

Available on the web at www.citigroup.com


Table of Contents


CITIGROUP INC.

THIRD QUARTER OF 2009—2010—FORM 10-Q

THE COMPANYOVERVIEW

 3
 

Citigroup Segments and RegionsCITIGROUP SEGMENTS AND REGIONS

 
4

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 
5

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

  
5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 
5

Management SummaryOverview of Results


5

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

 
7
 

Significant Events in the Third Quarter of 2009


9

SEGMENT, BUSINESS AND PRODUCT PRODUCT—INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES

 
129
 

Citigroup Income (Loss)

 
129
 

Citigroup Revenues

 
1310

CITICORP

 
1411

Regional Consumer Banking

 
1512
 

North America Regional Consumer Banking

 
1613
 

EMEA Regional Consumer Banking

 
1815
 

Latin America Regional Consumer Banking

 
1917
 

Asia Regional Consumer Banking

 
2019

Institutional Clients Group (ICG)

 
21
 

Securities and Banking

 
22
 

Transaction Services

 
24

CITI HOLDINGS

 
25
 

Brokerage and Asset Management

 
26
 

Local Consumer Lending

 
27
 

Special Asset Pool

 
29

CORPORATE/OTHER

 
32

GOVERNMENT PROGRAMSSEGMENT BALANCE SHEET

 
33

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY


34

Capital Resources


34

Funding and Liquidity


40

OFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS


44

MANAGING GLOBAL RISK

 
3645

LOAN AND CREDIT DETAILSCredit Risk

 
3645

Loan and Credit Overview


45
 

Loans Outstanding

 
3646
 

Details of Credit Loss Experience

 
4047

Impaired Loans, Non-Accrual Loans and Assets, and Renegotiated Loans


48
 

Non-Accrual Loans and Assets

 
4149

U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending


52
 

Consumer Loan Details

 
4362

Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts and Ratios


62

Consumer Loan Net Credit Losses and Ratios


63
  

Consumer Loan Modification Programs

 
4464

Consumer Mortgage Representations and Warranties


69

S&B Representations and Warranties


72

Corporate Credit Portfolio


73
  

U.S. Consumer Mortgage LendingMarket Risk

 
4576
  

N.A. CardsAverage Rates—Interest Revenue, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Margin

 
5078
  

U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans


53

Corporate Loan Details


54

U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposure in Citi Holdings—Special Asset Pool


57

Exposure to Commercial Real Estate


58

Direct Exposure to Monolines


59

Highly Leveraged Financing Transactions


60

DERIVATIVES


60

Market Risk Management Process


64

Operational Risk Management Process


66

Country and Cross-Border Risk


67

INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS


68
 

Average Balances and Interest Rates—Assets

 
6979
 

Average Balances and Interest Rates—Liabilities and Equity, and Net Interest Revenue

 
7080
 

Analysis of Changes in Interest Revenue

 
7383
 

Analysis of Changes in Interest Expense and Net Interest Revenue

 
7484

Analysis of Changes in Interest Revenue, Interest Expense and Net Interest Revenue


85

CAPITAL RESOURCESCROSS BORDER RISK AND LIQUIDITYSOVEREIGN EXPOSURE

 
7686

Capital ResourcesDERIVATIVES

 
7687

Common EquityINCOME TAXES

 
7889

Funding and LiquidityRECLASSIFICATION OF HELD-TO-MATURITY (HTM) SECURITIES TO AVAILABLE-FOR-SALE (AFS)

 
8190

Off-Balance Sheet ArrangementsEXPOSURE TO COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

 
8491

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

 
85

FAIR VALUATION

 
8592

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 
8592

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 
8593

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES

 
8694

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
8796

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
93105

OTHER INFORMATION

 
195204
 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 
195204
 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 
198206
 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 
199207
 

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders


200
 

Item 6. Exhibits

 
201208
 

Signatures

 
202209
 

Exhibit Index

 
203210

Table of Contents


THE COMPANYOVERVIEW

Introduction

        Citigroup's history dates back to the founding of Citibank in 1812. Citigroup's original corporate predecessor was incorporated in 1988 under the laws of the State of Delaware. Following a series of transactions over a number of years, Citigroup Inc. (Citigroupwas formed in 1998 upon the merger of Citicorp and together with its subsidiaries, the Company, Citi or Citigroup)Travelers Group Inc.

        Citigroup is a global diversified financial services holding company whose businesses provide consumers, corporations, governments and institutions with a broad range of financial services to consumerproducts and corporate customers. Citigroupservices. Citi has approximately 200 million customer accounts and does business in more than 140 countries.160 countries and jurisidictions.

        Citigroup was incorporated in 1988 under the lawscurrently operates, for management reporting purposes, via two primary business segments: Citicorp, consisting of Citi'sRegional Consumer Banking businesses andInstitutional Clients Group; and Citi Holdings, consisting of Citi'sBrokerage and Asset Management andLocal Consumer Lending businesses, and aSpecial Asset Pool. There is also a third segment,Corporate/Other. For a further description of the State of Delaware.

        The Company is a bank holding company within the meaning of the U.S. Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 registered with, and subject to examination by, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB). Citibank, N.A. is a U.S. national bank subject to supervision and examination by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)business segments and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Someproducts and services they provide, see "Citigroup Segments" below, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Note 3 to the Company's other subsidiaries are also subjectConsolidated Financial Statements.

        Throughout this report, "Citigroup" and "Citi" refer to supervisionCitigroup Inc. and examination by their respective federal and state authorities or, in the case of overseas subsidiaries, the regulators of the respective jurisdictions.its consolidated subsidiaries.

        This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Citigroup's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (20082009 (2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K), Citigroup's updated 20082009 historical financial statements and notes filed on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on October 13, 2009June 25, 2010 and Citigroup's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009. Additional financial, statistical, and business-related information for the third quarter of 2009, as well as business and segment trends, are included in a Financial Supplement that was furnished as Exhibit 99.2 to the Company's Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on October 15, 2009.

        The principal executive offices of the Company are located at 399 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10043, telephone number 212 559 1000.2010. Additional information about Citigroup is available on the Company's webcompany's Web site atwww.citigroup.com. Citigroup's recent annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, as well as the Company'sits other filings with the SEC are available free of charge through the Company's webcompany's Web site by clicking on the "Investors" page and selecting "All SEC Filings." The SEC webSEC's Web site also contains periodic and current reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding the CompanyCiti atwww.sec.gov.

        Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods' financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation.

        Within this Form 10-Q, please refer to the tables of contents on pages 2 and 94 for page references to Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively.

Impact of Adoption of SFAS 166/167

        Effective January 1, 2010, Citigroup adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 860, Transfers and Servicing, formerly SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166), and ASC 810, Consolidations, formerly SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167). Among other requirements, the adoption of these standards includes the requirement that Citi consolidate certain of its credit card securitization trusts and eliminate sale accounting for transfers of credit card receivables to those trusts. As a result, reported and managed-basis presentations are comparable for periods beginning January 1, 2010. For comparison purposes, prior period revenues, net credit losses, provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims and loans are presented on a managed basis in this Form 10-Q. Managed presentations were applicable only to Citi's North American branded and retail partner credit card operations inNorth America Regional Consumer Banking and Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending and any aggregations in which they are included. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for an additional discussion of the adoption of SFAS 166/167 and its impact on Citigroup.


Table of Contents

As described above, Citigroup is managed alongpursuant to the following segment and product lines:segments:

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

        The following are the four regions in which Citigroup operates. The regional results are fully reflected in the segment results.results above.

GRAPHICGRAPHIC


(1)
Asia includes Japan,Latin America includes Mexico, andNorth America includescomprises the U.S., Canada and Puerto Rico.

Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THIRD QUARTER 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Overview of Results

        During the third quarter of 2010, Citigroup continued its focus on (i) strengthening and investing in its core assets and businesses in Citicorp, (ii) building and maintaining its financial strength, including maintaining its capital, liquidity and continued expense discipline, and (iii) winding down Citi Holdings as quickly as practicable in an economically rational manner.

        For the quarter, Citigroup reported net income of $2.2 billion, or $0.07 per diluted share. Results for the quarter included a $435 million (after tax) loss related to the announced sale of The Student Loan Corporation (SLC), which is reflected in discontinued operations for the third quarter of 2010. Revenues of $20.7 billion decreased 10% from comparable year-ago levels. The decline in revenues was due to lower revenues in Citi Holdings (driven by a declining loan balance inLocal Consumer Lending and lower positive net revenue marks in theSpecial Asset Pool) and lowerSecurities and Banking revenues excluding Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA), offset by positive CVA of $99 million in the third quarter of 2010 (versus negative CVA of $1.8 billion in the prior-year period). Citicorp's net income was $3.5 billion; Citi Holdings had a net loss of $1.1 billion.

        In Citicorp,Securities and Banking revenues, excluding CVA, were $5.5 billion in the third quarter of 2010, down 17% from the prior-year period. While overall client market activity remained muted in the third quarter of 2010, Citi continued to benefit from consistent growth inSecurities and Banking emerging markets revenues. Fixed income markets revenues excluding CVA were $3.4 billion compared to $4.9 billion in the third quarter of 2009. Equity markets revenues excluding CVA were $1.1 billion, compared to $1.3 billion in the prior-year quarter. Investment banking revenues declined 20% from the prior-year period to $930 million. Lending revenues were negative $18 million in the third quarter of 2010, compared with a negative $794 million in the third quarter of 2009.

Regional Consumer Banking revenues were up $241 million on a comparable basis from the prior-year quarter to $8.2 billion, driven by growth in Latin America and Asia.

Transaction Services revenues were up from year-ago levels by 3% to $2.5 billion, also driven by growth in Latin America and Asia.

        Within Citi Holdings,Local Consumer Lending revenues of $3.5 billion in the third quarter of 2010 were down 33% on a comparable basis from the year-ago period, driven by a lower loan balance and continued asset sales, as well as the addition of $322 million of mortgage repurchase reserves related to North America residential real estate (compared to a build of $33 million in the prior-year period).

        Revenues in theSpecial Asset Pool decreased to $0.3 billion in the third quarter of 2010, from $1.4 billion in the prior-year period, largely driven by lower positive net revenue marks of $567 million in the third quarter of 2010, compared to $1,517 million in the same quarter of 2009.

        Citi'sNet interest revenue increased 10% from the third quarter of 2009, primarily driven by the impact from the adoption of SFAS 166/167. Sequentially, Citi's net interest margin (NIM) of 3.07% decreased by 8 basis points primarily due to the continued run-off and sales of higher-yielding assets in Citi Holdings and investments in lower-yielding securities, given current rates.

Non-interest revenue decreased 11% from the year-ago period reflecting lower revenues on mortgage servicing rights, partially offset by higher realized gains on investment securities.

Operating expenses decreased 3% from the year-ago quarter and were down 3% from the second quarter of 2010. The decline in expenses from the year-ago quarter reflected the decrease in Citi Holdings expenses, which more than offset the increase in Citicorp expenses resulting from continued investments in the Citicorp businesses. The sequential decline in expenses primarily related to the absence of the U.K. bonus tax in the second quarter of 2010, partially offset by ongoing investments in Citicorp businesses. Citi's full-time employees numbered 258,000 at September 30, 2010, down 18,000 from September 30, 2009 and down 1,000 from June 30, 2010.

Net credit losses of $7.7 billion in the third quarter of 2010 were down 30% from year-ago levels on a comparable basis, and down 4% from the second quarter of 2010. Net credit losses (NCLs) improved for the fifth consecutive quarter. Consumer NCLs of $6.7 billion were down 29% on a comparable basis from the prior-year period and down 10% from the prior quarter. While North America NCLs continued to represent over 80% of Citi's total consumer NCLs, during the third quarter of 2010, losses in North America improved at a faster rate than in Citi's international consumer businesses. North America consumer NCLs were down 11% sequentially, while international consumer NCLs declined by 7%.

        Corporate NCLs of $922 million were down 40% from the prior-year period and up 95% from the prior quarter. The sequential increase in corporate NCLs was principally due to a charge-off on a specific corporate credit in Citicorp, and, in Citi Holdings, higher cost of loan sales and the charge-off of loans for which Citi had previously established specific SFAS 114 reserves that were released during the third quarter of 2010 upon recognition of the charge-off.

        Citi's total allowance for loan losses was $43.7 billion at September 30, 2010, or 6.73% of total loans. The percentage was essentially flat compared to June 30, 2010, which was 6.72% of total loans. During the third quarter of 2010, Citi had a net release of $2.0 billion to its credit reserves and allowance for unfunded lending commitments, compared to a net build of $802 million in the third quarter of 2009 and a net release of $1.5 billion in the second quarter of 2010. An improving to stabilizing credit environment contributed to the release during the current quarter. Citi experienced continued improvement in NCLs and 90 days or more delinquencies across its North America cards portfolios (both branded and Retail partner


Table of Contents

cards) and North America mortgage portfolio in Citi Holdings during the third quarter of 2010.

        The total allowance for consumer loan losses decreased $2.0 billion to $37.6 billion at the end of the quarter, but increased as a percentage of total consumer loans to 8.16%, compared to 7.87% at the end of the second quarter of 2010. The increase in the percentage was mainly due to the announced sale of SLC, which moved approximately $30 billion of loans to held-for-sale. The decrease in the total allowance was mainly due to a net release of $1.4 billion as well as reductions from asset sales in the U.S. real estate lending portfolio and certain loan portfolios moving to held-for-sale. The $1.4 billion net release was mainly driven by Retail partner cards in Citi Holdings, as well as the internationalRegional Consumer Banking businesses in Citicorp.

        The total allowance for loan losses for funded corporate loans declined by $552 million to $6.1 billion at September 30, 2010, or 3.22% of corporate loans, down from 3.59% in the second quarter of 2010. Corporate non-accrual loans were $9.9 billion at September 30, 2010, compared to $11.0 billion at June 30, 2010 and $14.7 billion in the year-ago period. The decrease in non-accrual loans from the prior quarter was mainly due to loan sales, write-offs and paydowns, which were partially offset by increases due to the weakening of certain borrowers.

        The effective tax rate on continuing operations for the third quarter of 2010 was 21%, reflecting taxable earnings in lower tax rate jurisdictions, as well as tax advantaged earnings.

Total deposits were $850 billion at September 30, 2010, up 4% from June 30, 2010 and up 2% from year-ago levels. Citi's structural liquidity (equity, long-term debt and deposits as a percentage of assets) was 71% at September 30, 2010, unchanged as compared with June 30, 2010 and down slightly from 72% at September 30, 2009.

Total assets increased $46 billion from the end of the second quarter of 2010 to $1,983 billion. Citi Holdings assets decreased $44 billion during the third quarter of 2010, consisting of approximately $32 billion of asset sales and business dispositions, $9 billion of net run-off and pay downs and $3 billion of net cost of credit and net asset marks. Citi Holdings total GAAP assets of $421 billion at September 30, 2010, represented 21% of Citi's total GAAP assets. Citi Holdings' risk-weighted assets were approximately $370 billion, or approximately 37% of Citi's risk-weighted assets, as of September 30, 2010.

        Citigroup'sTotal stockholders' equity increased by $8.1 billion during the third quarter of 2010 to                                     $162.9 billion, reflecting net income during the quarter, $1.9 billion related to the ADIA share issuance and a $3.9 billion improvement inAccumulated other comprehensive income largely from foreign exchange translation (generally referred to throughout this report as "FX translation"). Citigroup's total equity capital base and trust preferred securities were $183.4 billion at September 30, 2010. Citigroup maintained its "well-capitalized" position with a Tier 1 Capital ratio of 12.50% at September 30, 2010, up from 11.99% at June 30, 2010. Citigroup's Tier 1 Common ratio was 10.33% at September 30, 2010, compared to 9.71% at June 30, 2010.

Business Outlook

        Within Citicorp, overall trends in client activity and the global economic and capital markets environment are expected to continue to drive Citi'sSecurities and Banking revenues.

        Citi expects continued headwinds in North AmericaRegional Consumer Banking from The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act), which will continue to have a negative impact on U.S. credit card revenues. Citi currently estimates that the CARD Act will have a net pre-tax impact on Citi-branded cards for the full year 2010 at the lower end of its previously disclosed range of $400 million to $600 million. As previously disclosed, for Retail partner cards inLocal Consumer Lending, Citi's full-year 2010 estimate of negative net revenue impact resulting from the CARD Act is approximately $150 million to $200 million. Within the international businesses inRegional Consumer Banking, Citi believes revenues should begin to reflect the growth Citi is seeing in the underlying revenue drivers, such as new loan and deposit growth.

        Within Citi Holdings, Citi currently believesLocal Consumer Lending revenues should continue to decline given the shrinking loan balance resulting from paydowns and continued asset sales. Citi further believes that net revenue marks in theSpecial Asset Pool, which have been positive for the last six quarters, will remain episodic.

        NIM will likely remain under pressure throughout the remainder of the year.

        With respect to expenses, Citi expects quarterly expenses to continue to be in the range of $11.5 billion to $12 billion. As previously disclosed, Citicorp's expenses may continue to increase, reflecting ongoing investments in its core businesses, while in Citi Holdings expenses should continue to decline as assets are reduced.

        As in recent prior quarters, credit costs are expected to remain a significant component of earnings performance in the fourth quarter. In North America cards, Citi expects NCLs will continue to improve modestly for both portfolios, but likely remain at elevated levels until employment recovers in the U.S. In North America mortgages, Citi remains cautious as the improvement in NCLs and delinquency metrics to date reflects asset sales and loss mitigation efforts. Mortgages also remain at risk to economic factors, including unemployment, home prices, government programs, and foreclosure regulations. Internationally, Citi believes consumer NCLs should remain fairly stable in the fourth quarter.

        Consumer loan loss reserve balances will continue to reflect the losses embedded in Citi's consumer portfolios, given underlying credit trends and loss mitigation efforts. The recognition of credit losses and the build or release of loan loss reserves in Citi's corporate credit portfolio will continue to be episodic.


Table of Contents

CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—Page 1

 
  
  
  
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  
 
 
 Third Quarter  
  
 
In millions of dollars,
except per share amounts
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $11,998 $13,404  (10)%$37,753 $40,478  (7)%

Non-interest revenue

  8,392  2,854  NM  37,127  5,475  NM 
              

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $20,390 $16,258  25%$74,880 $45,953  63%

Operating expenses

  11,824  14,007  (16) 35,508  44,598  (20)

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  9,095  9,067    32,078  22,019  46 
              

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes

 $(529)$(6,816) 92 $7,294 $(20,664) NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  (1,122) (3,295) 66  620  (9,628) NM 
              

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

 $593 $(3,521) NM $6,674 $(11,036) NM 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of taxes

  (418) 613  NM  (677) 578  NM 
              

Net Income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

 $175 $(2,908) NM $5,997 $(10,458) NM 

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

  74  (93) NM  24  (37) NM 
              

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $101 $(2,815) NM $5,973 $(10,421) NM 
              

Less:

                   
 

Preferred dividends—Basic

 $(272)$(389) 30%$(2,988)$(833) NM 
 

Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance—Basic(1)

        (1,285)   NM 
 

Preferred stock Series H discount accretion—Basic

  (16)   NM  (123)   NM 
 

Impact of the Public and Private Preferred stock exchange offer

  (3,055)   NM  (3,055)   NM 
              

Income (loss) available to common stockholders

  (3,242) (3,204) (1) (1,478) (11,254) 87 
 

Allocation of dividends to common stock and participating securities, net of forfeitures

    (1,738) NM  (63) (5,151) 99 
              

Undistributed earnings (loss) for basic EPS

 $(3,242)$(4,942) 34%$(1,541)$(16,405) 91%

Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends

    270  NM  540  606  (11)
              

Undistributed earnings (loss) for diluted EPS

 $(3,242)$(4,672) 31%$(1,001)$(15,799) 94%
              

Earnings per share

                   
 

Basic(2)

                   
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(0.23)$(0.72) 68%$(0.10)$(2.28) 96%
 

Net income (loss)

  (0.27) (0.61) 56  (0.19) (2.17) 91 
              
 

Diluted(2)

                   
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(0.23)$(0.72) 68%$(0.10)$(2.28) 96%
 

Net income (loss)

  (0.27) (0.61) 56  (0.19) (2.17) 91 
              
 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months Ended  
 
In millions of dollars,
except per share amounts
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Total managed revenues(1)

 $20,738 $23,142  (10)%$68,230 $83,210  (18)%

Total managed net credit losses(1)

  7,659  10,982  (30) 24,005  32,282  (26)
              

Net interest revenue

 $13,246 $11,998  10%$41,846 $37,753  11%

Non-interest revenue

  7,492  8,392  (11) 26,384  37,127  (29)
              

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $20,738 $20,390  2%$68,230 $74,880  (9)%

Operating expenses

  11,520  11,824  (3) 34,904  35,508  (2)

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  5,919  9,095  (35) 21,202  32,078  (34)
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 $3,299 $(529) NM $12,124 $7,294  66%

Income taxes (losses)

  698  (1,122) NM  2,546  620  NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $2,601 $593  NM $9,578 $6,674  44%

Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  (374) (418) 11  (166) (677) 75 
              

Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $2,227 $175  NM $9,412 $5,997  57%

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  59  74  (20) 119  24  NM 
              

Citigroup's net income

 $2,168 $101  NM $9,293 $5,973  56%
              

Less:

                   
 

Preferred dividends—Basic

   $272      $2,988    
 

Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance—Basic(2)

           1,285    
 

Preferred stock Series H discount accretion—Basic

    16       123    
 

Impact of the Public and Private preferred stock exchange offer(2)

    3,055       3,055    
 

Dividends and earnings allocated to participating securities, net of forfeitures applicable to Basic EPS

  20       78  2    
              

Income (loss) allocated to unrestricted common shareholders for basic EPS

 $2,148 $(3,242) NM $9,215 $(1,480) NM 
 

Less: Convertible Preferred Stock Dividends

          540    
 

Add: Incremental dividends and earnings allocated to participating securities, net of forfeitures applicable to Diluted EPS

  1       2      
              

Income (loss) allocated to unrestricted common shareholders for diluted EPS

 $2,149 $(3,242) NM $9,217 $(940) NM 

Earnings per share

                   
 

Basic(3)

                   
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $0.09 $(0.23) NM $0.32 $(0.10) NM 
 

Net income (loss)

  0.07  (0.27) NM  0.32  (0.19) NM 
              
 

Diluted(3)

                   
 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $0.08 $(0.23) NM $0.32 $(0.10) NM 
 

Net income (loss)

  0.07  (0.27) NM  0.31  (0.19) NM 
              

[Continued on the following page, including notes to table.]


Table of Contents

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA—Page 2


  
  
  
 Nine Months Ended
September 2009,
  
   
  
  
 Nine Months Ended September 30,  
 

 Third Quarter  
  
  Third Quarter  
  
 

 %
Change
Nine Months Ended
September 2009,
 %
Change
Nine Months Ended September 30,
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 %
Change
 2009 2010 2009 %
Change
 2010

At September 30:

  

Total assets

 $1,888,599 $2,050,131 (8)%        $1,983,280 $1,888,599 5%       

Total deposits

 832,603 780,343 7        850,095 832,603 2       

Long-term debt

 379,557 393,097 (3)        387,330 379,557 2       

Mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary Trusts (included in Long-term debt)

 34,531 23,836 45        20,449 34,531 (41)       

Common stockholders' equity

 140,530 98,638 42        162,601 140,530 16       

Total stockholders' equity

 140,842 126,062 12        162,913 140,842 16       

Direct staff(in thousands)

 276 352 (22)        258 276 (7)       
                          

Ratios:

  

Return on common stockholders' equity(3)(4)

 (12.2)% (12.2)%   (2.3)% (13.8)%    5.4% (12.2)%   8.1% (2.3)%   
                          

Tier 1 Common(4)(5)

 9.12% 3.72%          10.33% 9.12%         

Tier 1 Capital

 12.76% 8.19%          12.50 12.76         

Total Capital

 16.58% 11.68%          16.14 16.58         

Leverage(5)(6)

 6.87% 4.70%          6.57 6.85         
                          

Common stockholders' equity to assets

 7.4% 4.8%          8.20% 7.44%         

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends

 0.96 NM   1.16 NM    1.53 0.95   1.63 1.16   
                          

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, Income available(loss) allocated to unrestricted common stockholders includes a reduction of $1.285 billion related to a conversion price reset pursuant to Citigroup's prior agreement with the purchasers of $12.5 billion of convertible preferred stock issued in a private offering in January 2008. The conversion price was reset from $31.62 per share to $26.35 per share. There was no impact to net income, total stockholders' equity or capital ratios due to the reset. However, the reset resulted in a reclassification from Retained earnings to Additional paid-in capital of $1.285 billion and a reduction in Income availableallocated to unrestricted common stockholders of $1.285 billion. The 2009 third quarter Income available(loss) allocated to unrestricted common stockholders includes a reduction of $3.055 billion related to the preferred stock exchanged for common stock and trust preferred securities as part of the exchange offers.

(2)(3)
The Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 260-10-45 to 65, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities" on January 1, 2009. All prior periods have been restated to conform to the current presentation. The Diluted EPS calculation for the third quarter and nine monthsfull year of 2009 and 2008 utilize Basic shares and Income availableallocated to unrestricted common stockholders (Basic) due to the negative Income availableallocated to unrestricted common stockholders. Using actual Diluted shares and Income availableallocated to unrestricted common stockholders (Diluted) would result in anti-dilution.

(3)(4)
The return on average common stockholders' equity is calculated using income (loss) available to common stockholders.

(4)(5)
As defined by the banking regulators, the Tier 1 Common ratio represents Tier 1 Capital less qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts divided by risk-weighted assets. Tier 1 Common ratio is a non-GAAP measure. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below for additional information on this measure.

(5)(6)
The Leverage ratio represents Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average total assets.

NM
Not meaningful

        Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior periods' financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation.

        Within this Form 10-Q, please refer to the indices on pages 2 and 86 for page references to the Management's Discussion and Analysis section and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, respectively.


Table of Contents


MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

THIRD QUARTER OF 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY

        Citigroup reported net income of $101 million, and a loss of ($0.27) per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2009. The ($0.27) loss per share reflected a $3.1 billion charge to retained earnings related to the closing of the exchange offers, the remaining preferred stock dividends required to be paid prior to the closing of the exchange offers and the remaining quarterly accretion of the Series H preferred stock discount.

Revenues of $20.4 billion increased 25% from year-ago levels due primarily to positive revenue marks and gains in Citi Holdings relative to the prior-year period, and a $1.4 billion gain from the extinguishment of debt associated with the closing of the exchange offers. The increase was partially offset by credit valuation adjustments (CVA) of $1.7 billion in Securities and Banking, the absence of Smith Barney revenues of $2.0 billion in the third quarter of 2009 and foreign currency translation.

Net interest revenue declined 10% from the 2008 third quarter, primarily reflecting the Company's smaller balance sheet. Net interest margin in the third quarter of 2009 was 2.95%, down 20 basis points from the third quarter of 2008, reflecting a decrease in asset yields related to the decrease in the Federal funds rate, largely offset by significantly lower funding costs.Non-interest revenue increased $5.5 billion from a year ago, primarily reflecting the absence of significant losses in the Citi Holdings Special Asset Pool portfolio.

        Operating expenses decreased 16% from the year-ago quarter and were down 1% from the second quarter of 2009 primarily due to divestitures, including Smith Barney, the re-sizing of the Citi Holdings businesses, the re-engineering of Citicorp processes, expense control, and the impact of foreign currency translation. Headcount of 276,000 was down 76,000 from September 30, 2008 and down 3,000 from June 30, 2009.

        The Company's total allowance for loan losses totaled $36.4 billion at September 30, 2009, a coverage ratio of 5.85% of total loans up from 5.6% at June 30, 2009, even though corporate loans declined by $13 billion during the quarter and consumer loans decreased by $6 billion. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a net build of $802 million to its credit reserves. The build for the quarter was $3.1 billion lower than the second quarter of 2009, consisting of a net build of $893 million for consumer loans and a net release of $91 million for corporate loans.

        Consumer non-accrual loans totaled $17.9 billion at September 30, 2009, compared to $15.8 billion at June 30, 2009 and $10.8 billion at September 30, 2008, primarily related to the recognition of SFAS 114 charge-offs in the quarter. The consumer loan delinquency rate was 4.70% at September 30, 2009, compared to 4.24% at June 30, 2009 and 2.66% a year ago. Delinquencies continue to rise for the first mortgage portfolio in the U.S. due primarily to the lengthening of the foreclosure process by many states and the increasing impact of the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP). Loans in the HAMP trial modification period are reported as delinquent if the original contractual payments are not received on time (even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower) until the loan has completed the trial period under the program (see "Loan and Credit Details—Consumer Loan Modification Programs" and "—U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending" below).

        Corporate non-accrual loans were $14.8 billion at September 30, 2009, compared to $12.4 billion at June 30, 2009 and $2.7 billion a year ago. The increase from the prior quarter is mainly due to the Company's continued policy of actively moving loans into non-accrual at earlier stages of anticipated distress. Over two-thirds of the non-accrual corporate loans are current and continue to make their contractual payments. The increase from prior-year levels is also attributable to the transfer of non-accrual loans from the held-for-sale portfolio (which are carried at lower-of-cost-or-fair value and excluded from non-accrual loans) to the held-for-investment portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2008. The total allowance for loan loss reserve balance for funded corporate loans remained stable at $8 billion at the end of the quarter, or 4.4% of corporate loans, up from 4.1% in the second quarter of 2009.

        The Company's effective tax rate on continuing operations in the third quarter of 2009 was 212% versus 48% in the prior-year period. The tax provision reflected a higher proportion of income earned and indefinitely reinvested in countries with relatively lower tax rates as well as a higher proportion of income from tax advantaged sources. The current quarter also includes a tax benefit of $103 million in continuing operations relating to a release of tax reserves on interchange fees, which was supported by a favorable Tax Court decision in a case litigated by another financial institution.

        Total deposits were $833 billion at September 30, 2009, up 3% from June 30, 2009 and up 7% from year-ago levels. At September 30, 2009, the Company had increased its structural liquidity (equity, long-term debt and deposits) as a percentage of assets from 66% at December 31, 2008 to 72% at September 30, 2009. Over the past six months, Citigroup and its subsidiaries have issued $20 billion of non-guaranteed debt outside of the FDIC's TLGP.

        Citigroup has continued its deleveraging, reducing total assets from $2,050 billion a year ago to $1,889 billion at September 30, 2009. Asset reductions in Citi Holdings made up approximately 98% of the decline, reflecting the Company's continued strategy of reducing its assets and exposures in this business segment, which are down by almost one-third since the peak levels of early 2008.

        Primarily as a result of the exchange offers, Citigroup increased its Tier 1 Common by $63 billion from the second quarter of 2009 to $90 billion. In addition, the Company's Tangible Common Equity (TCE) increased by $62 billion from the second quarter of 2009 to $102 billion at September 30, 2009. (TCE and Tier 1 Common are non-GAAP financial


Table of Contents

measures. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" for additional information on these measures.)

        The closing of the exchange offers also resulted in a reconstitution of the Company's equity base. Common Equity increased 98% from December 31, 2008 to $140.5 billion. Citigroup's total stockholders' equity decreased by $11.5 billion during the third quarter of 2009 to $140.8 billion, primarily reflecting the impact of the exchange offers, partially offset by a $4.0 billion improvement inAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income. Citigroup's total equity capital base and trust preferred securities were $175.4 billion at September 30, 2009. The Tier 1 Capital ratio and Tier 1 Common ratio were 12.76% and 9.12%, respectively, at September 30, 2009.


Table of Contents


SIGNIFICANT EVENTS IN THE THIRD QUARTER OF 2009

        Certain significant events have occurred during the fiscal year to date, including events subsequent to September 30, 2009, that had, or could have, an effect on Citigroup's current and future financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and capital resources. These events are summarized below and discussed throughout this MD&A.

EXCHANGE OFFERS

Private Exchange Offers

        On July 23, 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with the private holders of $12.5 billion aggregate liquidation value of preferred stock. The U.S. Treasury (UST) matched these exchange offers by exchanging $12.5 billion aggregate liquidation value of its preferred stock, for a total closing of $25 billion. Following the approval, on September 2, 2009, by Citi shareholders of an increase in Citi's authorized common stock, on September 10, 2009, the private holders and the UST received an aggregate of approximately 7,692 million shares of Citigroup common stock.

Public Exchange Offers

        On July 29, 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with the holders of approximately $20.4 billion in aggregate liquidation value of publicly-held preferred stock and trust preferred securities, representing 99% of the total liquidation value of securities Citigroup was offering to exchange. Upon closing of the public exchange offers, Citi issued approximately 5.8 billion shares of common stock to the public exchange offer participants.

        In addition, on July 30, 2009, the UST matched the public exchange offers by exchanging an additional $12.5 billion aggregate liquidation value of its preferred stock. Following the increase in Citigroup's authorized common stock, on September 10, 2009, the UST received an additional approximately 3.8 billion shares of Citigroup common stock.

        In total, approximately $58 billion in aggregate liquidation value of preferred stock and trust preferred securities were exchanged for common stock upon completion of all stages of the exchange offers. As a result of the exchange offers, the UST owned approximately 33.6% of Citigroup's outstanding common stock, not including the exercise of the warrants issued to the UST as part of TARP and pursuant to the loss-sharing agreement. See "Government Programs" below.

Trust Preferred Securities

        On July 30, 2009, all remaining preferred stock of Citigroup held by the UST and the FDIC that was not exchanged into Citigroup common stock in connection with the exchange offers, in an aggregate liquidation amount of approximately $27.1 billion, was exchanged into newly issued 8% trust preferred securities.

Accounting Impact

        The accounting for the exchange offers resulted in the de-recognition of preferred stock and the recognition of the common stock issued at fair value in theCommon stock andAdditional paid-in capital accounts in equity. The difference between the carrying amount of preferred stock and the fair value of the common stock was recorded inRetained earnings (impacting net income available to common shareholders and EPS) orAdditional paid-in capital accounts in equity, depending on whether the preferred stock was originally non-convertible or convertible.

        For the U.S. Government (USG) preferred stock that was converted to 8% trust preferred securities, the newly issued trust preferred securities were initially recorded at fair value asLong-term debt. The difference between the carrying amount of the preferred stock and the fair value of the trust preferred securities was recorded inRetained earnings after adjusting for the appropriate deferred tax liability (impacting net income available to common shareholders and EPS). For trust preferred securities exchanged for common stock, the carrying amount recorded as long-term debt was de-recognized and the common stock issued was recorded at fair value in theCommon Stock and theAdditional Paid-in Capital accounts in equity. The difference between the carrying amount of the trust preferred securities and the fair value of the common stock was recorded in Other revenue in the third quarter of 2009.


Table of Contents

        The following table presents the impact of the completion of all stages of the exchange offers to Citigroup's common shares outstanding and to its balance sheet:

(in millions of dollars, except incremental number of Citigroup common shares)
 Impact on 
Security Notional
Amounts
 Converted
Into
 Incremental
Number of
Citigroup
Common
Shares
 Date of
Settlement
 Other
Assets(3)
 Long-
Term
Debt
 Preferred
Stock
 Common
Stock
 Additional
Paid In
Capital
 Income
Statement(2)
 Retained
Earnings(1)
 
 
  
  
 (in millions)
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 

Convertible Preferred Stock held by Private Investors

 $12,500 Common Stock  3,846  7/23/2009 $   $(12,500)$38 $21,801 $ $(9,340)

Convertible Preferred Stock held by Public Investors

  3,146 Common Stock  823  7/29/2009      (3,146) 8  5,128    (1,990)

Non-Convertible Preferred Stock held by Public Investors

  11,465 Common Stock  3,351  7/29/2009      (11,465) 33  9,116    2,316 

Trust Preferred Securities held by Public Investors

  5,773 Common Stock  1,660  7/29/2009  (602) (5,972)   17  4,515  851  851 

USG TARP Preferred Stock matching the Preferred Stock held by Private Investors

  12,500 Common Stock  3,846  7/23/2009      (11,924) 38  10,615    1,270 

USG TARP Preferred Stock matching the Preferred Stock and Trust Preferred Securities held by Public Investors

  12,500 Common Stock  3,846  7/30/2009      (11,926) 39  10,615    1,272 

USG TARP Preferred Stock

  20,000 TruPS    7/30/2009  (2,883) 12,004  (19,514)       4,627 

Non-Convertible Preferred Stock held by U.S. Treasury and FDIC related to covered asset guarantee (loss-sharing agreement)

  7,059 TruPS    7/30/2009  (503) 4,237  (3,530)       (1,210)

Total

       17,372    $(3,988)$10,269 $(74,005)$173 $61,790 $851 $(2,204)

Note: Table may not foot due to roundings.

Summary of Impact of Exchange Offers

        During the third quarter of 2009, TCE increased by $60 billion as a result of the exchange of approximately $74 billion carrying amount of preferred shares and $6 billion carrying value of trust preferred securities for 17,372 million shares of common stock and approximately $27.1 billion liquidation amount of trust preferred securities (recorded asLong-term debt at its fair value of $16.2 billion). This resulted in an increase to common stock and APIC of $62 billion and a reduction inRetained earnings of approximately $2 billion, for a total increase in TCE of approximately $60 billion. The additional $64 billion of Tier 1 Common includes the impact of the above plus a reduction in the disallowed Deferred tax asset (which increases Tier 1 Common) that arises from the accounting for the transactions. TCE and Tier 1 Common are non-GAAP financial measures. See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below for additional information on these measures.

(1)
TheRetained earnings impact primarily reflects:

a)
Difference between the carrying value of the preferred stock exchanged versus the fair value of the common stock and trust preferred securities issued.

b)
Value of inducement offer to the convertible preferred stock holders (calculated as the incremental shares received in excess of the original terms multiplied by stock price on the commitment date); and

c)
After-tax gain from extinguishment of debt associated with the trust preferred securities held by public investors.

(2)
After-tax gain reflected in third quarter 2009 earnings of approximately $0.9 billion from the extinguishment of debt associated with the trust preferred securities held by public investors.

(3)
Primarily represents the impact on deferred taxes of the various exchange transactions, which will benefit Tier 1 Common and Tier 1 Capital.

        Earnings per share in the third quarter of 2009 was impacted by (1) the increase in shares outstanding as a result of the issuance of common shares and interim securities and the timing thereof, (2) the net impact toRetained earnings and income statement resulting from the exchange offers and (3) dividends on USG preferred shares accrued up to the date of their conversion to interim securities and trust preferred securities.


Table of Contents


DEFERRED TAX ASSET

        Deferred taxes are recorded for the future consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns, based upon enacted tax laws and rates. Deferred tax assets (DTAs) are recognized subject to management's judgment that realization is more likely than not.

        As of September 30, 2009, Citigroup had recognized a net deferred tax asset of approximately $38 billion, down $4 billion from approximately $42 billion at June 30, 2009 and down $6.5 billion from approximately $44.5 billion at December 31, 2008. Approximately $13 billion of the net deferred tax asset is included in Tier 1 and Tier 1 Common regulatory capital. The principal items reducing the deferred tax asset during 2009 were a decrease of approximately $3.9 billion relating to the exchange offers and $2.8 billion due to an increase in Other Comprehensive Income.

        Although realization is not assured, the Company believes that the realization of the recognized net deferred tax asset at September 30, 2009 is more likely than not based upon expectations of future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which it operates and available tax planning strategies.

        Approximately $17 billion of Citigroup's DTA is represented by U.S. federal, state and local tax return carry-forwards subject to expiration substantially beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2028. The remaining $21 billion DTA is largely due to timing differences between the recognition of income for GAAP and tax, representing net deductions that have not yet been taken on a tax return and are not currently subject to expiration. The most significant source of these timing differences is the loan loss reserve build, which accounts for approximately $14 billion of the net DTA. In general, Citigroup would need to generate approximately $85 billion of taxable income during the respective carry-forward periods to fully realize its U.S. federal, state and local DTA.

        Citi's ability to utilize its deferred tax assets to offset future taxable income may be significantly limited if Citi experiences an "ownership change," as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). In general, an ownership change will occur if there is a cumulative change in Citi's ownership by "5% shareholders" (as defined in the Code) that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period.

        The common stock issued pursuant to the exchange offers did not result in an ownership change under the Code. On June 9, 2009, the board of directors of Citigroup adopted a tax benefits preservation plan (the "Plan"). The purpose of the Plan is to minimize the likelihood of an ownership change occurring for Section 382 purposes and thus protect Citigroup's ability to utilize certain of its deferred tax assets, such as net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards, to offset future income. Despite adoption of the Plan, future stock issuance or transactions in our stock that may not be in our control, including sales by the USG, may cause Citi to experience an ownership change and thus limit the Company's ability to utilize its deferred tax asset and reduce its TCE and stockholders' equity.

DIVESTITURES

Sale of Nikko Cordial Securities

        On October 1, 2009, Citigroup completed the sale of its domestic Japanese domestic securities business, conducted principally through Nikko Cordial Securities Inc. (NCS) to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation in a transaction with a total cash value of approximately $8.7 billion (¥776 billion). The transaction will be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2009. After considering the impact of foreign exchange hedges of the proceeds of the transaction (most of which has been recorded in the second and third quarters of 2009), the sale will result in an immaterial after-tax gain to Citigroup.

        Beginning in the second quarter of 2009, the results of NCS and its related companies are reflected as Discontinued Operations in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. At September 30, 2009, assets of $23.6 billion and liabilities of $16.0 billion are reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as "Assets/ Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale", respectively, including $3.8 billion of identifiable goodwill and intangibles.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

        As required by SFAS 165, Subsequent Events, the Company has evaluated subsequent events through November 6, 2009, which is the date its Consolidated Financial Statements were issued.

ACCOUNTING CHANGES AND FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

        See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of "Accounting Changes" and "Future Application of Accounting Standards."


Table of Contents


SEGMENT, BUSINESS AND PRODUCT PRODUCT—INCOME (LOSS) AND REVENUES

        The following tables show the income (loss) and revenues for Citigroup on a segment, business and product view:


Citigroup Income (Loss)CITIGROUP INCOME (LOSS)



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars
In millions of dollars
 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Income from Continuing Operations

  

Income (loss) from Continuing Operations

Income (loss) from Continuing Operations

 

CITICORP

CITICORP

  

CITICORP

 

Regional Consumer Banking

Regional Consumer Banking

  

Regional Consumer Banking

 

North America

 $163 $(44) NM $345 $470 (27)%

North America

 $147 $206 (29)%$231 $702 (67)%

EMEA

  (23) 31 NM (166) 87 NM 

EMEA

 22 (23) NM 99 (166) NM 

Latin America

  29 102 (72)% 268 867 (69)

Latin America

 558 77 NM 1,438 412 NM 

Asia

  446 357 25 969 1,344 (28)

Asia

 505 444 14% 1,655 971 70 
                           
 

Total

 $615 $446 38 $1,416 $2,768 (49)% 

Total

 $1,232 $704 75%$3,423 $1,919 78%
                           

Securities and Banking

Securities and Banking

  

Securities and Banking

 

North America

 $(77)$1,340 NM $2,493 $3,368 (26)%

North America

 $456 $7 NM $2,719 $2,472 10%

EMEA

  548 102 NM 3,466 674 NM 

EMEA

 505 550 (8)% 1,892 3,467 (45)

Latin America

  216 227 (5)% 1,137 853 33 

Latin America

 266 219 21 735 1,158 (37)

Asia

  68 569 (88) 1,720 1,502 15 

Asia

 180 71 NM 952 1,724 (45)
                           
 

Total

 $755 $2,238 (66)%$8,816 $6,397 38% 

Total

 $1,407 $847 66%$6,298 $8,821 (29)%
                           

Transaction Services

Transaction Services

  

Transaction Services

 

North America

 $152 $94 62%$471 $243 94%

North America

 $131 $152 (14)%$456 $471 (3)%

EMEA

  308 348 (11) 984 925 6 

EMEA

 305 308 (1) 929 984 (6)

Latin America

  148 159 (7) 458 451 2 

Latin America

 171 148 16 481 458 5 

Asia

  331 317 4 904 899 1 

Asia

 318 331 (4) 934 904 3 
                           
 

Total

 $939 $918 2%$2,817 $2,518 12% 

Total

 $925 $939 (1)%$2,800 $2,817 (1)%
                           

Institutional Clients Group

Institutional Clients Group

 $2,332 $1,786 31%$9,098 $11,638 (22)%

Institutional Clients Group

 $1,694 $3,156 (46)%$11,633 $8,915 30%              

Total Citicorp

Total Citicorp

 $2,309 $3,602 (36)%$13,049 $11,683 12%

Total Citicorp

 $3,564 $2,490 43%$12,521 $13,557 (8)%
                           

CITI HOLDINGS

CITI HOLDINGS

  

CITI HOLDINGS

 

Brokerage and Asset Management

Brokerage and Asset Management

 $139 $(57) NM $7,011 $96 NM 

Brokerage and Asset Management

 $(147)$90 NM $(154)$6,899 NM 

Local Consumer Lending

Local Consumer Lending

  (2,099) (2,285) 8% (7,711) (3,366) NM 

Local Consumer Lending

 (827) (2,142) 61% (3,895) (8,060) 52%

Special Asset Pool

Special Asset Pool

  142 (4,594) NM (5,095) (18,041) 72%

Special Asset Pool

 (80) 58 NM 922 (5,136) NM 
             

Total Citi Holdings

Total Citi Holdings

 $(1,818)$(6,936) 74%$(5,795)$(21,311) 73%

Total Citi Holdings

 $(1,054)$(1,994) 47%$(3,127)$(6,297) 50%
                           

Corporate/Other

Corporate/Other

 $102 $(187) NM $(580)$(1,408) 59 

Corporate/Other

 $91 $97 (6)%$184 $(586) NM 

Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations

 $593 $(3,521) NM $6,674 $(11,036) NM 
                           

Discontinued Operations

 $(418)$613   $(677)$578   

Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

  74 $(93)   24 $(37)   

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 $2,601 $593 NM $9,578 $6,674 44%
                           

Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

 $101 $(2,815) NM $5,973 $(10,421) NM 

Discontinued operations

Discontinued operations

 $(374)$(418)   $(166)$(677)   

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 59 74   119 24   
                           

Citigroup's net income

Citigroup's net income

 $2,168 $101 NM $9,293 $5,973 56%
             

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents


Citigroup RevenuesCITIGROUP REVENUES(1)



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars
In millions of dollars
 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

CITICORP

CITICORP

 

CITICORP

 

Regional Consumer Banking

Regional Consumer Banking

 

Regional Consumer Banking

 

North America

 $1,754 $1,472 19%$5,604 $5,917 (5)%

North America

 $3,740 $2,017 85%$11,234 $6,702 68%

EMEA

 415 498 (17) 1,169 1,467 (20)

EMEA

 349 415 (16) 1,130 1,169 (3)

Latin America

 1,826 2,300 (21) 5,436 6,906 (21)

Latin America

 2,233 1,971 13 6,427 5,845 10 

Asia

 1,680 1,839 (9) 4,842 5,674 (15)

Asia

 1,839 1,717 7 5,484 4,958 11 
                           
 

Total

 $5,675 $6,109 (7)%$17,051 $19,964 (15)% 

Total

 $8,161 $6,120 33%$24,275 $18,674 30%
                           

Securities and Banking

Securities and Banking

 

Securities and Banking

 

North America

 $1,312 $4,018 (67)%$8,454 $11,117 (24)%

North America

 $2,203 $1,301 69%$8,383 $8,038 4%

EMEA

 2,198 1,395 58 8,974 5,098 76 

EMEA

 1,733 2,202 (21) 6,010 8,982 (33)

Latin America

 703 469 50 2,547 1,872 36 

Latin America

 639 705 (9) 1,804 2,554 (29)

Asia

 680 1,463 (54) 4,214 4,382 (4)

Asia

 1,018 683 49 3,354 4,218 (20)
                           
 

Total

 $4,893 $7,345 (33)%$24,189 $22,469 8% 

Total

 $5,593 $4,891 14%$19,551 $23,792 (18)%
                           

Transaction Services

Transaction Services

 

Transaction Services

 

North America

 $643 $540 19%$1,888 $1,557 21%

North America

 $620 $643 (4)%$1,895 $1,888  

EMEA

 845 953 (11) 2,549 2,784 (8)

EMEA

 835 845 (1) 2,516 2,549 (1)%

Latin America

 337 378 (11) 1,020 1,092 (7)

Latin America

 384 337 14 1,084 1,020 6 

Asia

 632 695 (9) 1,857 2,029 (8)

Asia

 696 632 10 1,979 1,857 7 
                           
 

Total

 $2,457 $2,566 (4)$7,314 $7,462 (2)% 

Total

 $2,535 $2,457 3%$7,474 $7,314 2%
                           

Institutional Clients Group

Institutional Clients Group

 $8,128 $7,348 11%$27,025 $31,106 (13)%

Institutional Clients Group

 $7,350 $9,911 (26)%$31,503 $29,931 5%              

Total Citicorp

 $13,025 $16,020 (19)%$48,554 $49,895 (3)%
 

Total Citicorp

 $16,289 $13,468 21%$51,300 $49,780 3%
                           

CITI HOLDINGS

CITI HOLDINGS

 

CITI HOLDINGS

 

Brokerage and Asset Management

Brokerage and Asset Management

 $670 $2,094 (68)%$14,710 $6,951 NM 

Brokerage and Asset Management

 $(8)$525 NM $473 $14,352 (97)%

Local Consumer Lending

Local Consumer Lending

 4,647 5,432 (14) 15,030 19,156 (22)%

Local Consumer Lending

 3,547 4,362 (19)% 12,423 13,864 (10)

Special Asset Pool

Special Asset Pool

 1,377 (6,822) NM (3,844) (27,842) 86 

Special Asset Pool

 314 1,363 (77) 2,426 (3,547) NM 
             

Total Citi Holdings

Total Citi Holdings

 $6,694 $704 NM $25,896 $(1,735) NM 

Total Citi Holdings

 $3,853 $6,250 (38)%$15,322 $24,669 (38)%
                           

Corporate/Other

Corporate/Other

 $671 $(466) NM $430 $(2,207) NM 

Corporate/Other

 $596 $672 (11)%$1,608 $431 NM 

Total Net Revenues

 $20,390 $16,258 25%$74,880 $45,953 63%
                           

Total net revenues

Total net revenues

 $20,738 $20,390 2%$68,230 $74,880 (9)%
             

Impact of Credit Card Securitization Activity

 
 

Citicorp

 $ $1,800 NM $ $4,928 NM 
 

Citi Holdings

  952 NM  3,402 NM 
             

Total impact of credit card securitization activity

Total impact of credit card securitization activity

 $ $2,752 NM $ $8,330 NM 
             

Total Citigroup—managed net revenues

Total Citigroup—managed net revenues

 $20,738 $23,142 (10)%$68,230 $83,210 (18)%
             

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents


CITICORP

        Citicorp is the company's global bank for consumers and businesses and represents Citi's core franchise. Citicorp is focused on providing best-in-class products and services to customers and leveraging Citigroup's unparalleled global network. Citicorp is physically present in approximately 100 countries, many for over 100 years, and offers services in over 160 countries and jurisdictions. Citi believes this global network provides a strong foundation for servicing the broad financial services needs of large multinational clients and for meeting the needs of retail, private banking, commercial and institutional customers around the world. Citigroup's global footprint provides coverage of the world's emerging economies, which Citi believes represent a strong area of growth. At September 30, 2010, Citicorp had approximately $1.3 trillion of assets and $757 billion of deposits, representing approximately 65% of Citi's total assets and approximately 89% of its deposits.

        Citicorp consists of the following businesses:Regional Consumer Banking (which includes retail banking and Citi-branded cards in four regions—North America, EMEA, Latin America andAsia) andInstitutional Clients Group (which includesSecurities and Banking andTransaction Services).



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $8,435 $8,316 1%$25,067 $24,980  

Net interest revenue

 $9,475 $8,727 9%$29,087 $26,012 12%

Non-interest revenue

 4,590 7,704 (40) 23,487 24,915 (6)%

Non-interest revenue

 6,814 4,741 44 22,213 23,768 (7)
                           

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $13,025 $16,020 (19)%$48,554 $49,895 (3)%

Total revenues, net of interest expense

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $16,289 $13,468 21%$51,300 $49,780 3%
                           

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 

Net credit losses

 $1,718 $1,317 30%$4,515 $3,535 28%

Net credit losses

 $3,020 $1,734 74%$9,127 $4,560 100%

Credit reserve build (release)

 465 799 (42) 2,570 1,846 39 

Credit reserve build (release)

 (427) 522 NM (1,426) 2,751 NM 
                           

Provision for loan losses

 $2,183 $2,116 3 $7,085 $5,381 32%

Provision for loan losses

 $2,593 $2,256 15%$7,701 $7,311 5%

Provision for benefits & claims

 14   41 3 NM 

Provision for benefits and claims

 38 43 (12) 109 127 (14)

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

  (80) 100 115 (155) NM 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

 1   (32) 115 NM 
                           
 

Total provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $2,197 $2,036 8%$7,241 $5,229 38% 

Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $2,632 $2,299 14%$7,778 $7,553 3%
                           

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 $8,181 $8,948 (9)$23,227 $28,174 (18)%

Total operating expenses

 $8,883 $8,422 5%$26,458 $23,889 11%
                           

Income from continuing operations before taxes

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $2,647 $5,036 (47)%$18,086 $16,492 10%

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $4,774 $2,747 74%$17,064 $18,338 (7)%

Provision for income taxes

 338 1,434 (76) 5,037 4,809 5 

Provisions for income taxes

Provisions for income taxes

 1,210 257 NM 4,543 4,781 (5)
                           

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 $2,309 $3,602 (36)%$13,049 $11,683 12%

Income from continuing operations

 $3,564 $2,490 43%$12,521 $13,557 (8)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 25 16 56 25 50 (50)

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 30 25 20 71 25 NM 
                           

Citicorp's net income

Citicorp's net income

 $2,284 $3,586 (36)%$13,024 $11,633 12%

Citicorp's net income

 $3,534 $2,465 43%$12,450 $13,532 (8)%
                           

Balance Sheet Data (in billions)

 

Balance sheet data(in billions of dollars)

Balance sheet data(in billions of dollars)

 

Total EOP assets

Total EOP assets

 $1,014 $1,158 (12)%       

Total EOP assets

 $1,283 $1,075 19%       

Average assets

Average assets

 $1,032 $1,175 (12)%$1,024 $1,287 (20)%

Average assets

 1,252 1,096 14 $1,245 $1,076 16%

Return on assets

Return on assets

 1.12% 0.89%   1.34% 1.68%   

Total EOP deposits

Total EOP deposits

 $728 $683 7%       

Total EOP deposits

 757 731 4       
                           

Total GAAP revenues

Total GAAP revenues

 $16,289 $13,468 21%$51,300 $49,780 3%

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

  1,800 NM  4,928 NM 
             

Total managed revenues

Total managed revenues

 $16,289 $15,268 7%$51,300 $54,708 (6)%
             

GAAP net credit losses

GAAP net credit losses

 $3,020 $1,734 74%$9,127 $4,560 100%

Impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

  1,876 NM  $5,204 NM 
             

Total managed net credit losses

Total managed net credit losses

 $3,020 $3,610 (16)%$9,127 $9,764 (7)%
             

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NM
Not meaningful


Table of Contents


REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

Regional Consumer Banking (RCB) consists of Citigroup's four regional consumer banking businesses that provide traditional banking services to retail customers.RCB also contains Citigroup's branded cards business and Citi's local commercial banking business.RCB is a globally diversified business with over 4,200 branches in 39 countries around the world. During the third quarter of 2010, 54% of totalRCB revenues were from outsideNorth America. Additionally, the majority of international revenues and loans were from emerging economies inAsia, Latin America, and Central and Eastern Europe and the Middle East. At September 30, 2010,RCB had $311 billion of assets and $300 billion of deposits.



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

Net interest revenue

 $3,992 $4,224 (5)%$11,508 $12,429 (7)%

Net interest revenue

 $5,689 $4,216 35%$17,380 $12,198 42%

Non-interest revenue

Non-interest revenue

 1,683 1,885 (11) 5,543 7,535 (26)

Non-interest revenue

 2,472 1,904 30 6,895 6,476 6 
                           

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $5,675 $6,109 (7)%$17,051 $19,964 (15)%

Total revenues, net of interest expense

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $8,161 $6,120 33%$24,275 $18,674 30%
                           

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 $3,547 $4,029 (12)%$10,344 $12,005 (14)%

Total operating expenses

 $4,087 $3,778 8%$12,006 $10,985 9%
                           
 

Net credit losses

 $1,426 $1,096 30%$3,978 $2,940 35%

Net credit losses

 $2,731 $1,442 89%$8,693 $4,022 NM 
 

Credit reserve build (release)

 319 514 (38) 1,575 1,346 17 

Credit reserve build (release)

 (403) 356 NM (991) 1,661 NM 
 

Provision for benefits & claims

 14   41 3 NM 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

    (4)   
             

Provisions for benefits and claims

 38 43 (12)% 109 127 (14)%

Provision for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $1,759 $1,610 9%$5,594 $4,289 30%
             

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $2,366 $1,841 29%$7,807 $5,810 34%
                           

Income from continuing operations before taxes

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 369 $470 (21) 1,113 $3,670 (70)%

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $1,708 $501 NM $4,462 $1,879 NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

 (246) 24 NM (303) 902 NM 

Income taxes

Income taxes

 476 (203) NM 1,039 (40) NM 
                           

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 $615 $446 38%$1,416 $2,768 (49)%

Income from continuing operations

 $1,232 $704 75%$3,423 $1,919 78%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 2 5 (60) 2 10 (80)

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 (4) 2 NM (9) 2 NM 
                           

Net income

Net income

 $613 $441 39%$1,414 $2,758 (49)%

Net income

 $1,236 $702 76%$3,432 $1,917 79%
                           

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $201 $222 (9)% 191 $225 (15)%

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $311 $248 25%$308 $239 29%

Return on assets

Return on assets

 1.21% 0.79%   0.99% 1.64%   

Return on assets

 1.58% 1.12%   1.49% 1.07%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 275 266 3%       

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 296 279 6%       

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

 4.70% 3.35%         
             

Managed net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans

Managed net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans

 4.90% 5.97%         
                           

Revenue by business

Revenue by business

 

Revenue by business

 

Retail banking

 $4,005 $3,760 7%$11,735 $11,086 6%

Citi-branded cards

 4,156 2,360 76 12,540 7,588 65 
             
 

Total GAAP revenues

 $8,161 $6,120 33%$24,275 $18,674 30%

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

  1,800 NM  4,928 NM 
             

Total managed revenues

 $8,161 $7,920 3%$24,275 $23,602 3%
             

Net credit losses by business

Net credit losses by business

 

Retail banking

 $333 $395 (16)%$926 $1,161 (20)%

Citi-branded cards

 2,398 1,047 NM 7,767 2,861 NM 
             

Retail Banking

 $3,315 $3,531 (6)%$9,463 $10,559 (10)% 

Total GAAP net credit losses

 $2,731 $1,442 89%$8,693 $4,022 NM 

Citi-Branded Cards

 2,360 2,578 (8) 7,588 9,405 (19)

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

  1,876 NM  5,204 NM 
                           
 

Total revenues

 $5,675 $6,109 (7)%$17,051 $19,964 (15)%

Total managed net credit losses

 $2,731 $3,318 (18)%$8,693 $9,226 (6)%
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Retail Banking

 $609 $563 8%$1,480 $1,826 (19)%

Retail banking

 $778 $698 11%$2,510 $1,983 27%

Citi-Branded Cards

 6 (117) NM (64) 942 NM 

Citi-branded cards

 454 6 NM 913 (64) NM 
                           
 

Total

 $615 $446 38%$1,416 $2,768 (49)% 

Total

 $1,232 $704 75%$3,423 $1,919 78%
                           

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NM
Not meaningful


Table of Contents


NORTH AMERICA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

North America Regional Consumer Banking (NA RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses in the U.S.NA RCB's approximately 1,000 retail bank branches and 13.3 million retail customer accounts are largely concentrated in the greater metropolitan areas of New York, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Chicago, Miami, Washington, D.C., Boston, Philadelphia, and certain larger cities in Texas. At September 30, 2010,NA RCB had approximately $29 billion of retail banking and residential real estate loans and $144 billion of deposits. In addition,NA RCB had approximately 21 million Citi-branded credit card accounts, with $77 billion in outstanding card loan balances.



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

Net interest revenue

 $1,224 $978 25%$3,394 $2,673 27%

Net interest revenue

 $2,734 $1,387 97%$8,466 $3,909 NM 

Non-interest revenue

Non-interest revenue

 530 494 7 2,210 3,244 (32)

Non-interest revenue

 1,006 630 60 2,768 2,793 (1)%
                           

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,754 $1,472 19%$5,604 $5,917 (5)%

Total revenues, net of interest expense

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $3,740 $2,017 85%$11,234 $6,702 68%
                           

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 $1,331 $1,444 (8)%$4,023 $4,507 (11)%

Total operating expenses

 $1,501 $1,499  $4,611 $4,479 3%
                           

Net credit losses

 $280 $144 94%$843 $425 98%

Net credit losses

 $1,971 $279 NM $6,254 $843 NM 

Credit reserve build (release)

 30 (9) NM 402 286 41 

Credit reserve build

 40 54 (26)% 35 456 (92)%

Provision for benefits and claims

 14   41 2 NM 

Provisions for benefits and claims

 6 14 (57) 19 42 (55)
                           

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $324 $135 NM $1,286 $713 80%

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $2,017 $347 NM $6,308 $1,341 NM 
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $99 $(107) NM $295 $697 (58)%

Income from continuing operations before taxes

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $222 $171 30%$315 $882 (64)%

Income taxes (benefits)

Income taxes (benefits)

 (64) (63) (2)% (50) 227 NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

 75 (35) NM 84 180 (53)
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $163 $(44) NM $345 $470 (27)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

       

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 $147 $206 (29)%$231 $702 (67)%

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

       
                           

Net income (loss)

 $163 $(44) NM $345 $470 (27)%

Net income

Net income

 $147 $206 (29)%$231 $702 (67)%
                           

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $118 $75 57%$119 $74 61%

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 $139 $121 15%       

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 145 142 2       

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

 5.94% 3.51%         
             

Managed net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans(1)

Managed net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans(1)

 7.40% 7.31%         
                           

Revenue by business

Revenue by business

 

Revenue by business

 

Retail banking

 $1,372 $1,333 3%$3,975 $4,005 (1)%

Citi-branded cards(2)

 2,368 684 NM 7,259 2,697 NM 
             
 

Total GAAP revenues

 $3,740 $2,017 85%$11,234 $6,702 68%

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(2)

  1,800 NM  4,928 NM 
             

Total managed revenues

 $3,740 $3,817 (2)%$11,234 $11,630 (3)%
             

Net credit losses by business

Net credit losses by business

 

Retail banking

 $90 $78 15%$242 $222 9%

Citi-branded cards(2)

 1,881 201 NM $6,012 621 NM 
             

Retail banking

 $1,070 $1,004 7%$2,907 $2,806 4% 

Total GAAP net credit losses

 $1,971 $279 NM $6,254 $843 NM 

Citi-branded cards

 684 468 46 2,697 3,111 (13)

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(2)

  1,876 NM  5,204 NM 
                           
 

Total

 $1,754 $1,472 19%$5,604 $5,917 (5)%

Total managed net credit losses

 $1,971 $2,155 (9)%$6,254 $6,047 3%
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Retail banking

 $150 $143 5%$319 $205 56%

Retail banking

 $189 $193 (2)%$598 $676 (12)%

Citi-branded cards

 13 (187) NM 26 265 (90)

Citi-branded cards

 (42) 13 NM (367) 26 NM 
                           
 

Total

 $163 $(44) NM $345 $470 (27)% 

Total

 $147 $206 (29)%$231 $702 (67)%
                           

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

        Overall, most key revenue drivers

(1)
See "Managed Presentations" below.

(2)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in North America regional consumer banking were stable or higher in the third quarter of 2009 as comparedNote 1 to the second quarter of 2009. The key focus in Citi's North America consumer businesses will likely remain on engagement with customers to raise deposits and to offer loans. However, recovery is expected to be driven by improvement in credit in the key North American businesses. For a further discussion, see "Loan and Credit Details—Consumer Loan Modification Programs" and "—U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending" below.Consolidated Financial Statements.

NM
Not meaningful

3Q10 vs. 3Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 19%85% primarily due to the consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 effective January 1, 2010. On a managed basis,revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 2%, primarily reflecting higher net interest margin inthe impact of the CARD Act on branded cards higher volumes in retail banking, and better securitization revenue,revenues, partially offset by higher credit lossesimproved revenues in mortgages due to an increase in originations in the securitization trusts.current quarter (the vast majority of which were originated for sale).

Net interest revenue was up 25%down 11% on a managed basis driven by higher net interest margin in cards as a result of higher interest revenue from pricing actions and lower funding costs, and by the impact of the CARD Act as well as lower volumes in cards, where average managed loans were down 8% from the prior-year quarter. This decline was partially offset by lower write-offs of accrued interest in cards as credit continued to improve. A decrease in deposit spreads in the current interest rate environment was partially offset by higher deposit and loan volumes, in retail banking. Average deposits were 15% higher thanup 2% from the prior year, driven by growth in both consumer and commercial deposits.prior-year quarter.

Non-interest revenue increased 7%33% on a managed basis primarily driven by better securitization revenue, partially offset bydue to higher credit losses flowing throughgains on mortgage sales resulting from


Table of Contents

increased originations, which were up 56% from the securitization trusts.prior-year quarter.

        Operating expenses declined 8%, primarily reflectingwere flat compared to the benefits from re-engineering efforts and lower marketing costs.prior-year quarter as increased investment spending was offset by the one-time benefit related to the renegotiation of a third-party contract.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $189 million$1.7 billion primarily due to risingthe consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167. On a comparable basis,Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased $206 million, or 9%, from the prior-year quarter primarily due to lower net credit losses in both cards and retail banking. Continued weakening of leadingas underlying credit indicators and trends in the macro-economic environment, including rising unemployment and higher bankruptcy filings, drove higher credit costs.cards portfolio continued to improve. The cards managed net credit loss ratio increased 339decreased 16 basis points to 7.06%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio increased 120 basis points to 4.23%9.82%.

        The increase inNet Income also reflected a tax benefit resulting from the federal tax reserve release in the third quarter of 2009.

3Q093Q10 YTD vs. 3Q083Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 68% primarily due to the consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 effective January 1, 2010. On a managed basis,revenues, net of interest expense, declined 5%, primarily reflecting higher credit losses3% from the prior-year period, mainly due to lower volumes in branded cards, as well as the securitization trusts,net impact of the CARD Act on cards revenues. This decrease was partially offset by higher net interest marginbetter servicing hedge results in cards and higher volumes in retail banking.mortgages.

Net interest revenue was up 27%down 7% on a managed basis driven primarily by the impact of pricing actions and lower funding costsvolumes in cards, and by higher deposit volumes in retail banking, with average deposits up 10%managed loans down 6% from the prior-year period. The increase in deposit volumes, up 5% from the prior-year period, was offset by lower spreads in the current interest rate environment.

Non-interest revenue declined 32%increased 9% on a managed basis from the prior-year period mainly driven by higher credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts partially offset by better


Table of Contents

securitization revenue, and by the absence of a $349 million gain on the sale of Visa shares and a $170 million gain from a cards portfolio sale servicing hedge results in the prior-year period.mortgages.

        Operating expenses declined 11%, reflectingincreased 3% from the benefits from re-engineering efforts, lower marketing costs, andprior-year period. Expenses were fairly flat excluding the absenceimpact of $126 million of repositioning charges recordeda litigation reserve in the prior-year period, offset by the absencefirst quarter of a prior-year $159 million Visa litigation reserve release.2010.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased $573 million or 80%$5.0 billion primarily due to risingthe consolidation of securitized credit card receivables pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167. On a comparable basis,Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased $237 million, or 4%, primarily due to a lower loan loss reserve build, down $421 million from the prior-year period, offset by higher net credit losses in boththe branded cards and retail banking. Continued weakening of leading credit indicators and trends in the macro-economic environment, including rising unemployment and higher bankruptcy filings, drove higher credit costs.portfolio, which increased $187 million. The cards managed net credit loss ratio increased 33298 basis points to 6.74%, while10.43%.

Managed Presentations

 
 Third Quarter 
 
 2010 2009 

Managed credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans

  7.40% 7.31%

Impact from credit card securitizations(1)

    (4.91)%
      

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

  7.40% 2.40%
      

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the retail banking net credit loss ratio increased 70 basis points to 4.12%.

Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents


EMEA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

EMEA Regional Consumer Banking (EMEA RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses, primarily in Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa. Remaining activities in respect of Western Europe retail banking are included in Citi Holdings.EMEA RCB has generally repositioned its business, shifting from a strategy of widespread distribution to a focused strategy concentrating on larger urban markets within the region. An exception is Bank Handlowy, which has a mass market presence in Poland. The countries in whichEMEA RCB has the largest presence are Poland, Turkey, Russia and the United Arab Emirates. At September 30, 2010,EMEA RCB had approximately 300 retail bank branches with approximately 4 million customer accounts, $5 billion in retail banking loans and $9 billion in average deposits. In addition, the business had approximately 3 million Citi-branded card accounts with $3 billion in outstanding card loan balances.



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

Net interest revenue

 $262 $350 (25)%$729 $984 (26)%

Net interest revenue

 $222 $262 (15)%$700 $729 (4)%

Non-interest revenue

Non-interest revenue

 153 148 3 440 483 (9)

Non-interest revenue

 127 153 (17) 430 440 (2)
                           

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $415 $498 (17)%$1,169 $1,467 (20)%

Total revenues, net of interest expense

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $349 $415 (16)%$1,130 $1,169 (3)%
                           

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 $270 $372 (27)%$808 $1,142 (29)%

Total operating expenses

 $303 $270 12%$848 $808 5%
                           

Net credit losses

 $139 $55 NM $349 $150 NM 

Net credit losses

 $65 $139 (53)%$247 $349 (29)%

Credit reserve build (release)

 67 33 NM 297 64 NM 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

    (4)   
             

Credit reserve build (release)

 (51) 67 NM (107) 297 NM 

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $206 $88 NM $646 $214 NM 

Provisions for benefits and claims

       
             

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $14 $206 (93)%$136 $646 (79)%
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(61)$38 NM $(285)$111 NM 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $32 $(61) NM $146 $(285) NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

Income taxes (benefits)

 (38) 7 NM (119) 24 NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

 10 (38) NM 47 (119) NM 
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(23)$31 NM $(166)$87 NM 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $22 $(23) NM $99 $(166) NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 2 5 (60)% 2 11 (82)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 (1) 2 NM (1) 2 NM 
                           

Net income (loss)

Net income (loss)

 $(25)$26 NM $(168)$76 NM 

Net income (loss)

 $23 $(25) NM $100 $(168) NM 
                           

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $11 $14 (21)%$11 $14 (21)%

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $10 $11 (9)%$10 $11 (9)%

Return on assets

Return on assets

 (0.90)% 0.74%   (2.04)% 0.73%   

Return on assets

 0.91% (0.90)%   1.34% (2.04)%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 10 11 (9)%       

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 9 10 (4)       

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

 6.34% 2.10%         
             

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

 3.53% 6.34%         
                           

Revenue by business

Revenue by business

 

Revenue by business

 

Retail banking

 $237 $310 (24)%$676 $931 (27)%

Retail banking

 $186 $237 (22)%$613 $676 (9)%

Citi-branded cards

 178 188 (5) 493 536 (8)

Citi-branded cards

 163 178 (8) 517 493 5 
                           
 

Total

 $415 $498 (17)%$1,169 $1,467 (20)% 

Total

 $349 $415 (16)%$1,130 $1,169 (3)%
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Retail banking

 $(23)$(2) NM $(140)$(4) NM 

Retail banking

 $(18)$(23) 22%$(15)$(140) 89%

Citi-branded cards

  33 (100)% (26) 91 NM 

Citi-branded cards

 40   114 (26) NM 
                           
 

Total

 $(23)$31 NM $(166)$87 NM  

Total

 $22 $(23) NM $99 $(166) NM 
                           

NM
Not meaningful

3Q093Q10 vs. 3Q083Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense declined 17%, decreased 16%. More than halfA majority of the revenue declinedecrease was attributabledue to changeslower results from Citi's equity investment in foreign currency translation (generally referred to throughout this report as "FX translation"). Other drivers includedAkbank, lower wealth management and lending revenues due to lower volumescredit tightening and spread compression. InvestmentFX translation. This was partially offset by higher revenues in wealth management. Cards purchase sales were up 5% and assetsinvestment sales were up 20%. Assets under management declined by 29%increased 10% primarily due to market valuations and 25%, respectively.the introduction of new, regional initiatives.

Net interest revenue was 25%decreased 15%, primarily due to lower than the prior-year period with average loans for retail banking down 22% as a result of avolumes due to tighter origination criteria and various promotions aimed at client acquisition.

Non-interest revenue decreased 17% due to lower risk profile, branch closures and the impact of FX translation.results from Citi's equity investment in Akbank.

        Operating expenses declined 27%,increased 12% reflecting expense control actions, lowerincreased investments and marketing expenditure andexpenditures in the impact of FX translation. Cost savings were primarily achieved by branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering efforts.business.

        Provisions for loancredit losses and for benefits and claims increased $118decreased 93% mainly due to the impact of a $51 million to $206 millionloan loss reserve release in the thirdcurrent quarter, of 2009. While delinquencies improved during the third quarter of 2009 as compared to a $67 million build in the secondprior-year quarter, of 2009,and a 53% decline in net credit losses, continued to increase from $55 million to $139 million, and thedriven by credit improvements across most markets. The release of loan loss reserve build increased from $33 million to $67 million. Higher credit costs reflected continued credit deterioration, particularlyreserves in the UAE, Turkey, Polandcurrent period was driven by improvement in credit in most countries coupled with a decline in receivables. The cards net credit loss ratio improved to 4.39% in the current quarter from 7.27% and Russia.there was a 7% improvement in the net credit margin. The retail banking net credit loss ratio decreased from 5.85% in the prior-year quarter to 3.00% in the current quarter.

3Q093Q10 YTD vs. 3Q083Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense declined 20%, decreased 3%. Over half of theThe decrease in revenue decline was primarily attributable to the impact of FX translation. Other drivers included lower wealth management andretail bank lending revenues as a result of lower volumes, which were due to lower volumestighter origination criteria. This was partially offset by FX translation and spread compression. Investmenthigher revenues in cards due to higher volumes. Cards purchase sales and assets under management declined by 42% and 25%, respectively.increased 10%.

Net interest revenue was 26% lower than the prior-year period with average loans for retail banking down 20% and average deposits down 22%.decreased 4%, mainly due to a decline in volumes as a result of tighter origination criteria.

Non-interest revenue decreased by 9%2%, primarily due todriven by a litigation reserve build in the impactfirst half of FX translation.2010.

        Operating expenses declined 29%, reflecting expense control actions, lower marketing spend andincreased 5% driven by the impact of FX translation. Costtranslation and increased investment in the business, largely offset by cost savings were achieved byfrom branch closures, headcount reductions and re-engineering efforts.benefits.


Table of Contents

        Provisions for loancredit losses and for benefits and claims increased $432decreased 79% mainly due to the impact of a $107 million to $646 million. Net credit losses increased from $150 million to $349 million, while the loan loss reserve release in the first nine months of 2010, compared to a $297 million build increased from $64 million to $297 million. Higherin the prior-year period, as well as a 29% decline in net credit costs reflected continuedlosses. The release of loan loss reserves in the current period was driven by an improvement in credit deterioration across the region.in most countries coupled with a decline in receivables.


Table of Contents


LATIN AMERICA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

Latin America Regional Consumer Banking (LATAM RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses, with the largest presence in Mexico and Brazil.LATAM RCB includes branch networks throughoutLatin America as well as Banco Nacional de Mexico, or Banamex, Mexico's second largest bank with over 1,700 branches. At September 30, 2010,LATAM RCB had approximately 2,215 retail branches, with 27 million customer accounts, $21 billion in retail banking loan balances and $41 billion in average deposits. In addition, the business had approximately 12 million Citi-branded card accounts with $13 billion in outstanding loan balances.



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

Net interest revenue

 $1,339 $1,669 (20)%$3,940 $5,046 (22)%

Net interest revenue

 $1,501 $1,366 10%$4,430 $4,009 11%

Non-interest revenue

Non-interest revenue

 487 631 (23) 1,496 1,860 (20)

Non-interest revenue

 732 605 21 1,997 1,836 9 
                           

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,826 $2,300 (21)%$5,436 $6,906 (21)%

Total revenues, net of interest expense

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $2,233 $1,971 13%$6,427 $5,845 10%
                           

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 $1,077 $1,292 (17)%$3,027 $3,475 (13)%

Total operating expenses

 $1,258 $1,127 12%$3,666 $3,175 15%
                           

Net credit losses

 $656 $640 3%$1,809 $1,661 9%

Net credit losses

 $450 $657 (32)%$1,416 $1,808 (22)%

Credit reserve build (release)

 141 301 (53) 461 695 (34)

Credit reserve build (release)

 (300) 141 NM (677) 463 NM 

Provision for benefits and claims

     1 (100)

Provision for benefits and claims

 32 29 10 90 85 6 
                           

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $797 $941 (15)%$2,270 $2,357 (4)%

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $182 $827 (78)%$829 $2,356 (65)%
                           

Income from continuing operations before taxes

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $(48)$67 NM $139 $1,074 (87)%

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $793 $17 NM $1,932 $314 NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

 (77) (35) NM (129) 207 NM 

Income taxes

Income taxes

 235 (60) NM 494 (98) NM 
                           

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 $29 $102 (72)%$268 $867 (69)%

Income from continuing operations

 $558 $77 NM $1,438 $412 NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

       

Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 (3)   (8)   
                           

Net income

Net income

 $29 $102 (72)%$268 $867 (69)%

Net income

 $561 $77 NM $1,446 $412 NM 
                           

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 61 $81 (25)% 59 $78 (24)%

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $74 $66 12%$73 $64 14%

Return on assets

Return on assets

 0.19% 0.50%   0.61% 1.48%   

Return on assets

 3.01% 0.46%   2.65% 0.86%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 36 42 (14)%       

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

 41 36 13       

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

 9.04 7.79         
             

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

 5.48% 8.99%         
                           

Revenue by business

Revenue by business

 

Revenue by business

 

Retail banking

 $969 $1,067 (9)%$2,843 $3,180 (11)%

Retail banking

 $1,300 $1,114 17%$3,732 $3,252 15%

Citi-branded cards

 857 1,233 (30) 2,593 3,726 (30)

Citi-branded cards

 933 857 9 2,695 2,593 4 
                           
 

Total

 $1,826 $2,300 (21)%$5,436 $6,906 (21)% 

Total

 $2,233 $1,971 13%$6,427 $5,845 10%
                           

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

 

Retail banking

 $106 $112 (5)%$436 $573 (24)%

Retail banking

 $277 $154 80%$808 $580 39%

Citi-branded cards

 (77) (10) NM (168) 294 NM 

Citi-branded cards

 281 (77) NM 630 (168) NM 
                           
 

Total

 $29 $102 (72)%$268 $867 (69)% 

Total

 $558 $77 NM $1,438 $412 NM 
                           

NM
Not meaningful

3Q093Q10 vs. 3Q083Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense declined 21%, increased 13% mainly due to higher lending and deposit volumes as well as better margins in retail banking and, in cards, higher ANR and fees from new account acquisitions as well as the impact of FX translation, lower cards receivables and spread compression, partially offsettranslation.

Net interest revenue increased 10%, mainly driven by higher businesslending and deposit volumes in retail banking. Net interest revenue was 20% lower than the prior year caused by the decrease in cards receivables as well as lower spreads resulting from a lower risk profile, partially offset by higher business volumes in retail banking. Average deposits were down 14%, due primarily tobanking and the impact of FX translation. Average retail banking loans and deposits increased 20% and 13%, respectively. The increases were also spurred by better spreads and positive FX translation.

Non-interest revenue declined 23% increased 21%, primarily due to higher fees in the cards business and the impact of FX translation.

        Operating expenses declined 17%increased 12%, reflectingmainly due to the benefits from re-engineering effortsinvestments initiatives for account acquisitions in cards, the prior-year quarter's release of legal reserves and excess restructuring provisions, and the impact of FX translation.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased $144 million78%, mainly due to lowerthe impact of a $300 million loan loss reserve build of $160 million. While delinquencies decreased duringrelease in the third quarter 2009 ascurrent period, compared to a $141 million build in the second quarter 2009,same period last year, and a 32% decline in net credit losses, reflecting improved credit conditions, especially in Mexico cards. The cards net credit loss rates increasedratio declined across the region during the period, from 16.2%17.80% to 18.1%. Rising losses were apparent in Brazil and Mexico; however, the business continues10.39%, reflecting continued economic recovery. The retail banking net credit loss ratio dropped from 2.68% to focus on repositioning and de-risking the portfolio, particularly in the Mexico cards business.2.50%.

3Q093Q10 YTD vs. 3Q083Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 21% drivenincreased 10%, mainly due to higher lending and deposit volumes in retail banking aided by the impact of FX translation, lower volumes and spread compressiona moderate increase in the cards business. Net interest revenue was 22% lower than the prior year with average credit cards loans down 22%, and net interest margin decreasing as well due to the cards spread compression impact. Non-interest revenue declined 20%, primarily due to the decline in cards fees as well as the impact of FX translation.

Operating expenses declined 13%, reflecting the benefits from re-engineering efforts and the impact of FX translation. The prior-year period also included a $257 million expense benefit related to a legal vehicle restructuring in Mexico.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased $87 million or 4%. Cards net credit loss rates increased from 11.6% to 16.7%. Credit deterioration was apparent in Brazil and Mexico where the business has focused its repositioning and derisking efforts.


Table of Contents


ASIA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $1,167 $1,227  (5)%$3,445 $3,726  (8)%

Non-interest revenue

  513  612  (16) 1,397  1,948  (28)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,680 $1,839  (9)%$4,842 $5,674  (15)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $869 $921  (6)%$2,486 $2,881  (14)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $351 $257  37  977 $704  39%
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  81  189  (57)% 415  301  38 
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $432 $446  (3)%$1,392 $1,005  39%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $379 $472  (20)%$964 $1,788  (46)%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (67) 115  NM  (5) 444  NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $446 $357  25%$969 $1,344  (28)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

          (1) 100 
              

Net income

 $446 $357  25%$969 $1,345  (28)%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $92 $95  (3)%$87 $96  (9)

Return on assets

  1.92% 1.49%    1.49% 1.87%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

  91  93  (2)         

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  2.17  1.44             
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $1,039 $1,150  (10)%$3,037 $3,642  (17)%
 

Citi-branded cards

  641  689  (7) 1,805  2,032  (11)
              
  

Total

 $1,680 $1,839  (9)%$4,842 $5,674  (15)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $376 $310  21%$865 $1,052  (18)%
 

Citi-branded cards

  70  47  49  104  292  (64)
              
  

Total

 $446 $357  25%$969 $1,344  (28)%
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 9% driven by the absence of Visa assets sales gains in the 2008 third quarter, lower investment product revenues, lower loan volumes and the impact of FX translation. Net interest revenue was 5% lower than the prior-year period. Average loans and deposits were down 9% and 1%, respectively, in each case primarily due to the impact of FX translation. Non-interest revenue declined 16%, primarily due to the decline in investment revenues, lower Cards Purchase sales, the absence of Visa share sales gains and the impact of FX translation.

        Operating expensesNet interest revenue declined 6%increased 11%, reflectingmainly driven by higher lending and deposit volumes in retail banking. Average retail banking loans and deposits increased 21% and 13%, respectively. Additionally, cards ANR moderately increased and there was a positive FX translation.

Non-interest revenue increased 9%, due to higher fees in the benefits from re-engineering effortscards business and the impact of FX translation.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 3%65%, mainly due to the impact of lower credita net loan loss reserve release of $677 million year-to-date 2010, compared to a $463 million build offset by an increasein the same period last year, and a 22% decline in net credit losses, reflecting improved credit conditions, especially in Mexico cards. The cards net credit


Table of Contents

loss ratio declined from 16.36% to 12.14%, while the retail banking net credit loss ratio declined from 3.01% to 2.17%.


Table of Contents


ASIA REGIONAL CONSUMER BANKING

Asia Regional Consumer Banking (Asia RCB) provides traditional banking and Citi-branded card services to retail customers and small- to mid-size businesses, with the impact of FX translation. Rising credit losses were particularly apparentlargest Citi presence in the portfolios inSouth Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, Australia, Hong Kong, India and Korea. Compared toIndonesia. At September 30, 2010,Asia RCB had approximately 707 retail branches, 16 million retail banking accounts, $101 billion in average customer deposits, and $59 billion in retail banking loans. In addition, the second quarter of 2009, delinquencies improved and net credit losses flattened as this region showed possible early signs of economic recovery and increased levels of customer activity.business had approximately 15 million Citi-branded card accounts with $19 billion in outstanding loan balances.

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $1,232 $1,201  3%$3,784 $3,551  7%

Non-interest revenue

  607  516  18  1,700  1,407  21 
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,839 $1,717  7%$5,484 $4,958  11%
              

Total operating expenses

 $1,025 $882  16%$2,881 $2,523  14%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $245 $367  (33)%$776 $1,022  (24)%
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  (92) 94  NM  (242) 445  NM 
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $153 $461  (67)%$534 $1,467  (64)%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $661 $374  77%$2,069 $968  NM 

Income taxes

  156  (70) NM  414  (3) NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $505 $444  14%$1,655 $971  70%

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

             
              

Net income

 $505 $444  14%$1,655 $971  70%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $109 $96  14%$106 $90  18%

Return on assets

  1.84% 1.83%    2.09% 1.44%   

Average deposits(in billions of dollars)

  101  91  11          
              

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

  1.29% 2.21%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $1,147 $1,076  7%$3,415 $3,153  8%
 

Citi-branded cards

  692  641  8  2,069  1,805  15 
              
  

Total

 $1,839 $1,717  7%$5,484 $4,958  11%
              

Income from continuing operations by business

                   
 

Retail banking

 $330 $374  (12)%$1,119 $867  29%
 

Citi-branded cards

  175  70  NM  536  104  NM 
              
  

Total

 $505 $444  14%$1,655 $971  70%
              

NM
Not meaningful

3Q09 YTD3Q10 vs. 3Q08 YTD3Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, declined 15% driven by absence of Visa assetsincreased 7%, reflecting higher cards purchase sales, gains, a 34% decline in investment sales, lower loan and deposit volumes, and the impact of FX translation. translation, partially offset by lower spreads.

Net interest revenue was 8% lower3% higher than the prior-year period, reflectingmainly due to higher lending and deposit volumes and the impact of FX translation, partially offset by lower spreads. Average loans and deposits. deposits were up 15% and 11%, respectively.

Non-interest revenue declined 28% increased 18%, primarily due to the absence of Visa assethigher investment revenues, higher cards purchase sales, gains and the decline in investment sales.impact of FX translation.

        Operating expenses declined 14%increased 16%, reflectingprimarily due to the benefits from re-engineering effortsincrease in volumes and higher investment spending, and the impact of FX translation.

        Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 67%, mainly due to the impact of a $92 million loan loss reserve release in the current quarter, compared to a $94 million loan loss reserve build in the prior-year quarter, and a decrease in net credit losses of 33%. These declines were partially offset by the impact of FX translation. Delinquencies and net credit losses continued to decline from their peak level in the second quarter of 2009 as the region benefitted from continued economic recovery and increased 39%levels of customer activity. The cards net credit loss ratio decreased from 5.89% in the prior-year quarter to 3.54% in the current quarter. The retail banking net credit loss ratio decreased from 0.96% in the prior-year quarter to 0.56% in the current quarter.

3Q10 YTD vs. 3Q09 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 11%, driven by higher cards purchase sales, investment sales and loan and deposit volumes, and the impact of FX translation, partially offset by lower spread.

Net interest revenue was 7% higher than the prior-year period, mainly due to higher lending and deposit volumes and the impact of FX translation, partially offset by lower spreads.

Non-interest revenue increased 21%, primarily due to higher investment revenues, higher cards purchase sales, and the impact of FX translation.

Operating expenses increased 14%, primarily due to increase in volumes, continued investment spending, and the impact of FX translation.


Table of Contents

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 64%, mainly due to the impact of a net loan loss reserve release of $242 million in the first nine months of 2010, compared to a $445 million loan loss reserve build in the prior-year period, and a 24% decline in net credit losses. These declines were partially offset by the impact of FX translation. The decrease in provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims reflects continued credit quality improvement across the region, particularly in India and Korea and a higher credit reserve build.South Korea.


Table of Contents


INSTITUTIONAL CLIENTS GROUP

Institutional Clients Group (ICG)
includesSecurities and Banking andTransaction Services.ICG provides corporate, institutional and ultra-high net worth clients with a full range of products and services, including cash management, trading, underwriting, lending and advisory services, around the world.ICG's international presence is supported by trading floors in approximately 75 countries and a proprietary network withinTransaction Services in over 95 countries. At September 30, 2010,ICG had approximately $963 billion of assets and $457 billion of deposits.



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Commissions and Fees

 $565 $754 (25)%$1,500 $2,269 (34)%

Administration and Other Fiduciary Fees

 1,258 1,397 (10) 3,717 4,148 (10)

Commissions and fees

Commissions and fees

 $1,016 $1,122 (9)%$3,210 $3,100 4%

Administration and other fiduciary fees

Administration and other fiduciary fees

 672 702 (4) 2,008 2,122 (5)

Investment banking

Investment banking

 1,063 740 44 3,245 3,005 8 

Investment banking

 829 1,066 (22) 2,374 3,247 (27)

Principal transactions

Principal transactions

 (535) 3,116 NM 7,699 8,065 (5)

Principal transactions

 982 (571) NM 5,958 7,259 (18)

Other

Other

 556 (188) NM 1,783 (107) NM 

Other

 843 518 63 1,768 1,564 13 
                           

Total non-interest revenue

 $2,907 $5,819 (50)%$17,944 $17,380 3%

Total non-interest revenue

 $4,342 $2,837 53%$15,318 $17,292 (11)%

Net interest revenue (including dividends)

 4,443 4,092 9 13,559 12,551 8 

Net interest revenue (including dividends)

 3,786 4,511 (16) 11,707 13,814 (15)
                           

Total revenues, net of interest expenses

 $7,350 $9,911 (26)%$31,503 $29,931 5%

Total revenues, net of interest expense

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $8,128 $7,348 11%$27,025 $31,106 (13)%

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 4,634�� 4,919 (6) 12,883 16,169 (20)

Total operating expenses

 4,796 4,644 3 14,452 12,904 12 

Net credit losses

 292 221 32 537 595 (10)

Net credit losses

 289 292 (1) 434 538 (19)

Provisions for unfunded lending commitments

  (80) 100 115 (155) NM 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

 1   (28) 115 NM 

Credit reserve build (release)

 146 285 (49) 995 500 99 

Credit reserve build (release)

 (24) 166 NM (435) 1,090 NM 
             

Provisions for benefits and claims

       

Provision for credit losses

 $438 $426 3%$1,647 $940 75%
             

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $266 $458 (42)%$(29)$1,743 NM 
                           

Income from continuing operations before taxes

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $2,278 $4,566 (50)%$16,973 $12,822 32%

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $3,066 $2,246 37%$12,602 $16,459 (23)%

Income taxes (benefits)

 584 1,410 (59) 5,340 3,907 37 

Income taxes

Income taxes

 734 460 60 3,504 4,821 (27)
                           

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 $1,694 $3,156 (46)%$11,633 $8,915 30%

Income from continuing operations

 $2,332 $1,786 31%$9,098 $11,638 (22)%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

 23 11 NM 23 40 (43)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 34 23 48 80 23 NM 
                           

Net income

Net income

 $1,671 $3,145 (47)%$11,610 $8,875 31%

Net income

 $2,298 $1,763 30%$9,018 $11,615 (22)%
                           

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $831 $953 (13)%$833 $1,062 (22)%

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $941 $848 11%$937 $837 12%

Return on assets

Return on assets

 0.80% 1.31%   1.86% 1.12%   

Return on assets

 0.97% 0.82%   1.29% 1.86%   
                           

Revenue by region:

 

Revenues by region

Revenues by region

 

North America

 $1,955 $4,558 (57)%$10,342 $12,674 (18)%

North America

 $2,823 $1,944 45%$10,278 $9,926 4%

EMEA

 3,043 2,348 30 11,523 7,882 46 

EMEA

 2,568 3,047 (16) 8,526 11,531 (26)

Latin America

 1,040 847 23 3,567 2,964 20 

Latin America

 1,023 1,042 (2) 2,888 3,574 (19)

Asia

 1,312 2,158 (39) 6,071 6,411 (5)

Asia

 1,714 1,315 30 5,333 6,075 (12)
                           

Total revenues

Total revenues

 $8,128 $7,348 11%$27,025 $31,106 (13)%
 

Total

 $7,350 $9,911 (26)%$31,503 $29,931 5%              
             

Income (loss) from continuing operations by region:

 

Income from continuing operations by region

Income from continuing operations by region

 

North America

 $75 $1,434 (95)%$2,964 $3,611 (18)%

North America

 $587 $159 NM $3,175 $2,943 8%

EMEA

 856 450 90 4,450 1,599 NM 

EMEA

 810 858 (6)% 2,821 4,451 (37)

Latin America

 364 386 (6) 1,595 1,304 22 

Latin America

 437 367 19 1,216 1,616 (25)

Asia

 399 886 (55) 2,624 2,401 9 

Asia

 498 402 24 1,886 2,628 (28)
                           

Total income from continuing operations

Total income from continuing operations

 $2,332 $1,786 31%$9,098 $11,638 (22)%
 

Total

 $1,694 $3,156 (46)%$11,633 $8,915 30%              
             

Average loans by region(in billions):

 

Average loans by region(in billions of dollars)

Average loans by region(in billions of dollars)

 

North America

 $43 $52 (17)%       

North America

 $66 $49 35%       

EMEA

 42 49 (14)       

EMEA

 38 43 (12)       

Latin America

 21 24 (13)       

Latin America

 22 22        

Asia

 27 36 (25)       

Asia

 37 27 37       
                           

Total average loans

Total average loans

 $163 $141 16%       
 

Total

 $133 $161 (17)%                     
             

NM
Not meaningful


Table of Contents


SECURITIES AND BANKING

Securities and Banking (S&B) offers a wide array of investment and commercial banking services and products for corporations, governments, institutional and retail investors, and ultra-high net worth individuals.S&B includes investment banking and advisory services, lending, debt and equity sales and trading, institutional brokerage, foreign exchange, structured products, cash instruments and related derivatives, and private banking.S&B revenue is generated primarily from fees for investment banking and advisory services, fees and interest on loans, fees and spread on foreign exchange, structured products, cash instruments and related derivatives, income earned on principal transactions, and fees and spreads on private banking services.



 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 


 %
Change
 %
Change
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

Net interest revenue

 $3,050 $2,670 14%$9,305 $8,520 9%

Net interest revenue

 $2,353 $3,118 (25)%$7,488 $9,560 (22)%

Non-interest revenue

Non-interest revenue

 1,843 4,675 (61) 14,884 13,949 7 

Non-interest revenue

 3,240 1,773 83 12,063 14,232 (15)
                           

Revenues, net of interest expense

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $4,893 $7,345 (33)%$24,189 $22,469 8%

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $5,593 $4,891 14%$19,551 $23,792 (18)%

Operating expenses

 3,493 3,667 (5) 9,580 12,322 (22)

Total operating expenses

Total operating expenses

 3,566 3,503 2 10,901 9,601 14 

Net credit losses

 294 223 32 539 593 (9)

Net credit losses

 288 294 (2) 431 540 (20)

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

  (74) 100 115 (149) NM 

Provisions for unfunded lending commitments

 1   (28) 115 NM 

Credit reserve build (release)

 151 288 (48) 994 494 NM 

Credit reserve build (release)

 (8) 171 NM (366) 1,089 NM 
             

Provisions for benefits and claims

       

Provision for credit losses

 $445 $437 2%$1,648 $938 76%
                           

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interest

 $955 $3,241 (71)%$12,961 $9,209 41%

Income taxes

 200 1,003 (80) 4,145 2,812 47 

Provisions for credit losses and benefits and claims

Provisions for credit losses and benefits and claims

 $281 $465 (40)$37 $1,744 (98)%
             

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interests

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interests

 $1,746 $923 89%$8,613 $12,447 (31)%

Income taxes (benefits)

Income taxes (benefits)

 339 76 NM 2,315 3,626 (36)
             

Income from continuing operations

Income from continuing operations

 755 2,238 (66) 8,816 6,397 38 

Income from continuing operations

 1,407 847 66 6,298 8,821 (29)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 18 2 NM 19 14 36 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

 29 18 61 65 19 NM 
                           

Net income

Net income

 $737 $2,236 (67)%$8,797 $6,383 38%

Net income

 $1,378 $829 66%$6,233 $8,802 (29)%
                           

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $771 $883 (13)%$774 $990 (22)%

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $869 $788 10%$869 $778 12%

Return on assets

Return on assets

 0.38% 1.01%   1.52% 0.86%   

Return on assets

 0.63% 0.42%   0.96% 1.51%   
                           

Revenues by region:

 

Revenues by region

Revenues by region

 

North America

 $1,312 $4,018 (67)%$8,454 $11,117 (24)%

North America

 $2,203 $1,301 69%$8,383 $8,038 4%

EMEA

 2,198 1,395 58 8,974 5,098 76 

EMEA

 1,733 2,202 (21) 6,010 8,982 (33)

Latin America

 703 469 50 2,547 1,872 36 

Latin America

 639 705 (9) 1,804 2,554 (29)

Asia

 680 1,463 (54) 4,214 4,382 (4)

Asia

 1,018 683 49 3,354 4,218 (20)
                           

Total revenues

Total revenues

 $4,893 $7,345 (33)%$24,189 $22,469 8%

Total revenues

 $5,593 $4,891 14%$19,551 $23,792 (18)%
                           

Net income (loss) from continuing operations by region:

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations by region

Income (loss) from continuing operations by region

 

North America

 $(77)$1,340 NM $2,493 $3,368 (26)%

North America

 $456 $7 NM $2,719 $2,472 10%

EMEA

 548 102 NM 3,466 674 NM 

EMEA

 505 550 (8)% 1,892 3,467 (45)

Latin America

 216 227 (5)% 1,137 853 33 

Latin America

 266 219 21 735 1,158 (37)

Asia

 68 569 (88) 1,720 1,502 15 

Asia

 180 71 NM 952 1,724 (45)
                           

Total net income from continuing operations

 $755 $2,238 (66)%$8,816 $6,397 38%

Total income from continuing operations

Total income from continuing operations

 $1,407 $847 66%$6,298 $8,821 (29)%
                           

Securities and Banking

 

Securities and Banking revenue details

Securities and Banking revenue details

 

Revenue details:

 

Fixed income markets

 $3,501 $4,024 (13)%$12,594 $19,616 (36)%

Net Investment Banking

 $1,163 $618 88%$3,305 $2,783 19%

Investment banking

 930 1,164 (20) 2,661 3,308 (20)

Lending

 (699) 1,262 NM (1,956) 2,026 NM 

Equity markets

 1,040 446 NM 2,905 3,152 (8)

Equity markets

 446 550 (19) 3,151 3,237 (3)

Lending

 (18) (794) 98 747 (2,261) NM 

Fixed income markets

 3,945 4,756 (17) 19,739 13,927 42 

Private Bank

 497 522 (5) 1,503 1,507  

Private bank

 520 563 (8) 1,496 1,789 (16)

Other Securities and Banking

 (357) (471) 24 (859) (1,530) 44 

Other Securities and Banking

 (482) (404) (19) (1,546) (1,293) (20)              

Total Securities and Banking revenues

Total Securities and Banking revenues

 $5,593 $4,891 14%$19,551 $23,792 (18)%
                           

Total Securities and Banking Revenues

 $4,893 $7,345 (33)%$24,189 $22,469 8%
             

NM
Not meaningful

3Q10 vs. 3Q09

Revenues, net of interest expense, were $5.6 billion, compared to $4.9 billion in the prior-year quarter, resulting from an increase in CVA, lending and advisory revenues, partially offset by a decrease in fixed income markets, debt and equity underwriting, equity markets and Private Bank revenues. CVA was $99 million in the third quarter of 2010, reflecting derivative CVA gains as corporate spreads tightened during the quarter. CVA of negative $1.8 billion in the third quarter of 2009 was driven by narrowing of Citigroup spreads during the period. Lending revenues increased from negative $0.8 billion to negative $18 million, due to lower losses on credit default swap hedges. Fixed income markets revenues (excluding CVA, net of hedges, of $0.1 billion and negative $0.8 billion in the current quarter and prior-year quarter, respectively) declined $1.5 billion to $3.4 billion, with a majority of the decline coming from weaker results in Credit Products, Securitized Products and G10 Rates trading, which reflected a challenging market environment. This was partially offset by strong performance in emerging markets. Equity markets revenues (excluding CVA, net of hedges, of


Table of Contents

negative $22 million and negative $0.9 billion in the current quarter and prior-year quarter, respectively), decreased $0.3 billion to $1.1 billion, driven by lower client activity levels. Investment banking revenues decreased $0.2 billion to $0.9 billion, reflecting lower levels of market activity in debt and equity underwriting, partially offset by an increase in advisory revenues resulting from increased M&A transaction volume and improvement in completed M&A market share.

Operating expenses increased 2%, or $63 million, to $3.6 billion, reflecting select investments in the businesses.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased by $0.2 billion to $0.3 billion, primarily attributable to the impact of a $7 million credit reserve release in the current quarter, compared to a $171 million build in the prior-year quarter, as improvements continued in the corporate loan portfolio.

3Q10 YTD vs. 3Q09 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense for the current period were $19.6 billion, compared to $23.8 billion for the prior-year period, which was a particularly strong nine months driven by robust fixed income markets and higher client activity levels in investment banking. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in lending revenues, due to gains on credit default swap hedges. Revenue declines were also partially offset by an increase in CVA.

Operating expenses increased 14%, or $1.3 billion, to $10.9 billion, mainly driven by higher compensation costs, the U.K. bonus tax in the second quarter of 2010 and a net change in the litigation reserve releases.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased by $1.7 billion to $37 million primarily attributable to the impact of a $394 million credit reserve release in the current period, compared to a $1.2 billion build in the prior-year period, as the market environment showed signs of stabilization.


Table of Contents


TRANSACTION SERVICES

Transaction Services is composed of Treasury and Trade Solutions (TTS) and Securities and Fund Services (SFS). TTS provides comprehensive cash management and trade finance for corporations, financial institutions and public sector entities worldwide. SFS provides custody and funds services to investors such as insurance companies, mutual funds and hedge funds, clearing services to intermediaries such as broker-dealers, and depository and agency/trust services to multinational corporations and governments globally. Revenue is generated from net interest revenue on deposits in TTS and SFS, as well as from trade loans and from fees for transaction processing and fees on assets under custody in SFS.

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $1,433 $1,393  3%$4,219 $4,254  (1)%

Non-interest revenue

  1,102  1,064  4  3,255  3,060  6 
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $2,535 $2,457  3%$7,474 $7,314  2%

Total operating expenses

  1,230  1,141  8  3,551  3,303  8 

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

  (15) (7) NM  (66) (1) NM 
              

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interests

 $1,320 $1,323   $3,989 $4,012  (1)%

Income taxes

  395  384  3  1,189  1,195  (1)
              

Income from continuing operations

  925  939  (1) 2,800  2,817  (1)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  5  5    15  4  NM 
              

Net income

 $920 $934  (1)%$2,785 $2,813  (1)%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

  72  60  20% 68  59  15%

Return on assets

  5.07% 6.18%    5.48% 6.37%   
              

Revenues by region

                   
 

North America

 $620 $643  (4)%$1,895 $1,888   
 

EMEA

  835  845  (1) 2,516  2,549  (1)%
 

Latin America

  384  337  14  1,084  1,020  6 
 

Asia

  696  632  10  1,979  1,857  7 
              

Total revenues

 $2,535 $2,457  3%$7,474 $7,314  2%
              

Revenue details

                   
 

Treasury and Trade Solutions

 $1,846 $1,794  3%$5,432 $5,337  2%
 

Securities and Fund Services

  689  663  4  2,042  1,977  3 
              

Total revenues

 $2,535 $2,457  3%$7,474 $7,314  2%
              

Income from continuing operations by region

                   
 

North America

 $131 $152  (14)%$456 $471  (3)%
 

EMEA

  305  308  (1) 929  984  (6)
 

Latin America

  171  148  16  481  458  5 
 

Asia

  318  331  (4) 934  904  3 
              

Total income from continuing operations

 $925 $939  (1)%$2,800 $2,817  (1)%
              

Key indicators

                   

Average deposits and other customer liability balances(in billions of dollars)

 $340 $314  8%         

EOP assets under custody(in trillions of dollars)

  12.4  12.1  2          
              

NM
Not meaningful

3Q10 vs. 3Q083Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 33% or $2.5 billion to $4.9 billion mainly fromgrew 3% with increases in both the TTS and SFS businesses. TTS revenue marks of negative $1.4 billion, set forthincreased 3%, driven primarily by growth in greater detail below,Trade and a decrease in lendingCards businesses as well as higher balances which more than offset spread compression. SFS revenues of $2.0 billion to negative $699 million (mainly from losses on credit derivative positions). Fixed income markets revenues declined $811 million to $3.9 billion due to negative credit value adjustments of $760 million (mainly due to narrowing in Citigroup spreads, partially offset by the narrowing of counterparty spreads)increased 4%, compared to positive credit value adjustments of $2.6 billion in the third quarter of 2008, partially offset by stronger performances across most fixed income categories as market conditions improved. Equity markets revenues declined $104 million or 19% primarily driven by negative credit value adjustments of $878 million, offset by stronger results in proprietary trading and derivatives. Investment banking revenueshigher fees as well as increased $545 million, led by stronger high yield and investment grade debt issuances in debt underwriting, and stronger volumes in equity underwriting, with a decline in advisory revenues resulting from lower global M&Aclient activity.

        Operating expenses decreased 5% or $174increased 8%, related to increased technology and other investment spend required to support future business growth.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims declined by $8 million, primarily attributable to $3.5 billion, mainlya credit reserve release of $16 million in the current quarter, reflecting the improved quality of the portfolio.

3Q10 YTD vs. 3Q09 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, grew 2% as improvement in fees in both the TTS and SFS businesses more than offset spread compression. TTS revenue increased 2%, driven primarily by growth in Trade and Cards businesses. SFS revenues increased 3%, driven by higher fees as a result of growth in assets under custody and client activity.

Operating expenses increased 8%, related to continued investment spend required to support future business growth, as well as higher transaction related costs.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims declined by $65 million, primarily attributable to a credit reserve release of $69 million, reflecting the improved quality of the portfolio.


Table of Contents


CITI HOLDINGS

        Citi Holdings contains businesses and portfolios of assets that Citigroup has determined are not central to its core Citicorp businesses. These noncore businesses tend to be more asset intensive and reliant on wholesale funding and also may be product-driven rather than client-driven. Citi intends to exit these businesses as quickly as practicable in an economically rational manner through business divestitures, portfolio run-offs and asset sales.

        Citi has made substantial progress divesting and exiting businesses from Citi Holdings, having completed more than 30 divestiture transactions since the beginning of 2009 through September 30, 2010, including Smith Barney, Nikko Cordial Securities, Nikko Asset Management, Primerica Financial Services, various credit card businesses and Diners Club North America. During the third quarter of 2010, Citi announced sale of The Student Loan Corporation, which is currently expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2010. (The Student Loan Corporation is reported as Discontinued Operations within the Corporate/Other segment for the third quarter of 2010 only.) Citi Holdings' GAAP assets have been reduced by approximately 24%, or $135 billion, from the third quarter of 2009, and 49% from the peak in the first quarter of 2008. Citi Holdings' GAAP assets of $421 billion represent approximately 21% of Citi's assets as of September 30, 2010. Citi Holdings' risk-weighted assets of approximately $370 billion represent approximately 37% of Citi's risk-weighted assets as of September 30, 2010. Asset reductions from Citi Holdings have the combined benefits of further fortifying Citigroup's capital base, lowering risk, simplifying the organization and allowing Citi to allocate capital to fund long-term strategic businesses.

        Citi Holdings consists of the following businesses:Brokerage and Asset Management, Local Consumer Lending, andSpecial Asset Pool.

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $3,519 $3,732  (6)%$11,865 $12,951  (8)%

Non-interest revenue

  334  2,518  (87) 3,457  11,718  (70)
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $3,853 $6,250  (38)%$15,322 $24,669  (38)%
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

                   

Net credit losses

 $4,640 $6,234  (26)%$14,879 $19,042  (22)%

Credit reserve build (release)

  (1,567) 281  NM  (2,027) 4,563  NM 
              

Provision for loan losses

 $3,073 $6,515  (53)%$12,852 $23,605  (46)%

Provision for benefits and claims

  189  280  (33) 617  837  (26)

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

  26      (45) 80  NM 
              

Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $3,288 $6,795  (52)%$13,424 $24,522  (45)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $2,209 $2,962  (25)%$7,207 $10,756  (33)%
              

(Loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(1,644)$(3,507) 53%$(5,309)$(10,609) 50%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (590) (1,513) 61  (2,182) (4,312) 49 
              

(Loss) from continuing operations

 $(1,054)$(1,994) 47%$(3,127)$(6,297) 50%

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  80  49  63  99  1  NM 
              

Net (loss)

 $(1,134)$(2,043) 44%$(3,226)$(6,298) 49%
              

Balance sheet data(in billions of dollars)

                   

Total EOP assets

 $421 $556  (24)%         
              

Total EOP deposits

 $82 $87  (6)%         
              

Total GAAP Revenues

 $3,853 $6,250  (38)%$15,322 $24,669  (38)%
 

Net Impact of Credit Card Securitization Activity(1)

    952  NM    3,402  NM 
              

Total Managed Revenues

 $3,853 $7,202  (47)%$15,322 $28,071  (45)%
              

GAAP Net Credit Losses

 $4,640 $6,234  (26)%$14,879 $19,042  (22)%
 

Impact of Credit Card Securitization Activity(1)

    1,137  NM    3,472  NM 
              

Total Managed Net Credit Losses

 $4,640 $7,371  (37)%$14,879 $22,514  (34)%
              

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


NM
Not meaningful

Table of Contents


BROKERAGE AND ASSET MANAGEMENT

Brokerage and Asset Management (BAM), which constituted approximately 7% of Citi Holdings by assets as of September 30, 2010, consists of Citi's global retail brokerage and asset management businesses. This segment was substantially affected by, and reduced in size, due to the sales of Smith Barney (SB) to the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture (MSSB JV) and by the sale of Nikko Cordial Securities in 2009. At September 30, 2010,BAM had approximately $28 billion of assets, primarily consisting of Citi's investment in, and assets related to, the MSSB JV. Morgan Stanley has options to purchase Citi's remaining stake in the MSSB JV over three years starting in 2012.

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $(87)$(82) (6)%$(223)$444  NM 

Non-interest revenue

  79  607  (87) 696  13,908  (95)%
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $(8)$525  NM $473 $14,352  (97)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $221 $307  (28)%$744 $2,850  (74)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $2 $1  100%$14 $1  NM 
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  (4) (11) 64  (14) 35  NM 
 

Provision for benefits and claims

  9  8  13  27  27   
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

        (6)    
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $7 $(2) NM $21 $63  (67)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(236)$220  NM $(292)$11,439  NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  (89) 130  NM  (138) 4,540  NM 
              

Income from continuing operations

 $(147)$90  NM $(154)$6,899  NM 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  6  16  (63)% 8  5  60%
              

Net income (loss)

 $(153)$74  NM $(162)$6,894  NM 
              

EOP assets(in billions of dollars)

  28 $54  (48)%         

EOP deposits(in billions of dollars)

 $57  60  (5)         
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q10 vs. 3Q09

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased $533 million primarily due to the absence of the $320 million pre-tax gain on sale ($159 million after-tax) of Managed Futures which occurred in the prior-year quarter. Excluding the gain, revenues declined $213 million driven primarily by lower severancerevenues from the MSSB JV, negative private equity marks and divestitures.

Operating expenses decreased 28% from the benefitprior-year quarter, mainly due to the absence of FX translation, offset partially by an increase in compensation costs.Nikko and other divestitures.

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased by 2% or $8 million to $445$9 million, mainly reflecting a lower reserve release of $7 million.

Assets declined 48% versus the prior year, primarily driven by the sale of Nikko Cordial Securities and Nikko Asset Management.

3Q10 YTD vs. 3Q09 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 97% primarily due to the absence of the $11.1 billion pre-tax gain on the sale of SB ($6.7 billion after-tax) which closed on June 1, 2009 and the absence of a $320 million pre-tax gain on sale ($159 million after-tax) of Managed Futures. Excluding the gains, revenue declined $2.5 billion, or 84%, driven primarily by the absence of SB revenues.

Operating expenses decreased 74% from higherthe prior-year period, primarily driven by the absence of expenses from SB and the Nikko businesses.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims declined 67% primarily due to lower reserve build of $49 million, partially offset by increased net credit losses of $13 million.


Table of Contents


LOCAL CONSUMER LENDING

Local Consumer Lending (LCL), which constituted approximately 71% of Citi Holdings by assets as of September 30, 2010, includes a portion of Citigroup's North American mortgage business, Retail partner cards, Western European cards and retail banking, CitiFinancial North America and other local consumer finance businesses globally. The Student Loan Corporation is reported as Discontinued Operations within the Corporate/Other segment for the third quarter of 2010 only. At September 30, 2010,LCL had $298 billion of assets ($269 billion inNorth America). Approximately $137 billion of assets inLCL as of September 30, 2010 consisted of U.S. mortgages in the company's CitiMortgage and CitiFinancial operations. The North American assets consist of residential mortgage loans (first and second mortgages), retail partner card loans, personal loans, commercial real estate, and other consumer loans and assets.

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $3,383 $3,272  3%$11,091 $10,161  9%

Non-interest revenue

  164  1,090  (85) 1,332  3,703  (64)
              

Total revenues, net of interest expense(1)

 $3,547 $4,362  (19)%$12,423 $13,864  (10)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $1,872 $2,442  (23)%$6,096 $7,288  (16)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $3,949 $4,912  (20)%$13,422 $14,573  (8)%
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  (953) 577  NM  (988) 4,923  NM 
 

Provision for benefits and claims

  180  272  (34) 590  810  (27)
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

             
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $3,176 $5,761  (45)%$13,024 $20,306  (36)%
              

(Loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(1,501)$(3,841) 61%$(6,697)$(13,730) 51 

Income taxes

  (674) (1,699) 60  (2,802) (5,670) 51 
              

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $(827)$(2,142) 61%$(3,895)$(8,060) 52%

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

    13  (100) 7  24  (71)
              

Net (loss)

 $(827)$(2,155) 62%$(3,902)$(8,084) 52%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $317 $345  (8)%$335 $357  (6)%
              

Net credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans(2)

  6.31% 7.21%            
              

Revenue by business

                   
 

International

 $500 $852  (41)%$1,279 $3,565  (64)%
 

Retail partner cards(1)

  2,060  1,441  43  6,379  3,757  70 
 

North America (ex Cards)

  987  2,069  (52) 4,765  6,542  (27)
              
  

Total GAAP Revenues

 $3,547 $4,362  (19)%$12,423 $13,864  (10)%
 

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

    952  NM    3,402  NM 
              
 

Total Managed Revenues

 $3,547 $5,314  (33)%$12,423 $17,266  (28)%
              

Net Credit Losses by business

                   
 

International

 $444 $957  (54)%$1,551 $2,737  (43)%
 

Retail partner cards(1)

  1,505  867  74  5,212  2,640  97 
 

North America (ex Cards)

  2,000  3,088  (35) 6,659  9,196  (28)
              
  

Total GAAP net credit losses

 $3,949 $4,912  (20)%$13,422 $14,573  (8)%
 

Net impact of credit card securitization activity(1)

    1,137  NM    3,472  NM 
              
 

Total Managed Net Credit Losses

 $3,949 $6,049  (35)%$13,422 $18,045  (26)%
              

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(2)
See "Managed Presentations" below.

NM    Not meaningful

3Q10 vs. 3Q09

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 19% due to lower balances from portfolio run-off, asset sales, divestitures and held-for-sale reclassifications (primarily Primerica and The Student Loan Corporation), and a higher mortgage repurchase reserve, partially offset by the adoption of SFAS 166/167. Net interest revenue increased 3%, primarily due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167, partially offset by the impact of lower balances.

Operating expenses declined 23%, due to the impact of divestitures, lower volumes, re-engineering benefits and the absence of costs associated with the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, which was exited in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 45% from the prior-year quarter, reflecting a reserve release of provisions for unfunded lending commitments$1.0 billion, principally related to U.S. Retail partner cards, in the current quarter, compared to a reserve build in the prior-year quarter of $0.6 billion. Lower net credit losses were partially offset by the impact of the adoption of SFAS 166/167. On a managed basis, net credit losses declined for the fifth consecutive quarter, driven by improvement in the international portfolios as well as U.S. mortgages and Retail partner cards.

Assets declined 8% versus the prior year, primarily driven by portfolio run-off and the impact of asset sales, partially


Table of Contents

offset by an increase of $41 billion resulting from the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

3Q10 YTD vs. 3Q09 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 10% from the prior-year period. Net interest revenue increased 9% due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167, partially offset by the impact of lower balances due to portfolio run-off and asset sales. Non-interest revenue declined 64%, primarily due to the absence of the $1.1 billion gain on sale of Redecard in the first quarter of 2009 and a higher mortgage repurchase reserve in the second and third quarters.

Operating expenses decreased 16%, primarily due to the impact of divestitures, lower volumes, re-engineering actions and the absence of costs associated with the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, which was exited in the fourth quarter of 2009.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims decreased 36%, reflecting a net $1.0 billion reserve release in the first nine months of 2010 compared to a $4.9 billion build in the comparable period of 2009. Lower net credit losses across most businesses were partially offset by the impact of the adoption of SFAS 166/167. On a managed basis, net credit losses were lower, driven by improvement in the international portfolios, as well as U.S. mortgages and Retail partner cards.

Assets declined 6% versus the prior-year period, primarily driven by portfolio run-off, higher loan loss reserve balances, and the impact of asset sales and divestitures, partially offset by an increase of $41 billion resulting from the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

Managed Presentations

 
 Third Quarter 
 
 2010 2009 

Managed credit losses as a percentage of average managed loans

  6.31% 7.21%

Impact from credit card securitizations(1)

    (0.62)
      

Net credit losses as a percentage of average loans

  6.31% 6.59%
      

(1)
See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Japan Consumer Finance

        As previously disclosed, Citigroup continues to actively monitor a number of matters involving its Japan Consumer Finance business, including customer refund claims and defaults, as well as financial and legislative, regulatory, judicial and other political developments, relating to the charging of "gray zone" interest. Gray zone interest represents interest at rates that are legal but for which claims may not be enforceable.

        On September 28, 2010, one of Japan's largest consumer finance companies (Takefuji) declared bankruptcy and is now seeking to restructure, with court protection and assistance. Citi believes this action reflects the financial distress that Japan's top consumer finance lenders are facing as they continue to deal with liabilities for "gray zone" interest refund claims. Citi will continue to monitor and evaluate these matters and its reserves related thereto.


Table of Contents


SPECIAL ASSET POOL

Special Asset Pool (SAP), which constituted approximately 23% of Citi Holdings by assets as of September 30, 2010, is a portfolio of securities, loans and other assets that Citigroup intends to continue to reduce actively over time through asset sales and portfolio run-off. At September 30, 2010,SAPhad $95 billion of assets.SAPassets have declined by $233 billion, or 71%, from peak levels in the fourth quarter of 2007, reflecting cumulative asset sales, write-downs and portfolio run-off.

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $223 $542  (59)%$997 $2,346  (58)%

Non-interest revenue

  91  821  (89) 1,429  (5,893) NM 
              

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $314 $1,363  (77)%$2,426 $(3,547) NM 
              

Total operating expenses

 $116 $213  (46)% 367 $618  (41)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $689 $1,321  (48)%$1,443 $4,468  (68)%
 

Credit reserve builds (release)

  (610) (285) NM  (1,025) (395) NM 
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

  26      (39) 80  NM 
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $105 $1,036  (90)% 379 $4,153  (91)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $93 $114  (18)%$1,680 $(8,318) NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  173  56  NM  758  (3,182) NM 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(80)$58  NM $922 $(5,136) NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  74  20  NM  84  (28) NM 
              

Net income (loss)

 $(154)$38  NM $838 $(5,108) NM 
              

EOP assets(in billions of dollars)

 $95 $163  (42)%         
              

NM
Not meaningful

3Q10 vs. 3Q09

Revenues, net of interest expense,decreased 77% from the prior-year quarter, driven by lower positive net revenue marks. Revenues in the current quarter included non-credit accretion of $267 million and positive marks of $160 million on subprime-related direct exposures, partially offset by write-downs on commercial real estate of $123 million.

Operating expensesdecreased 46% driven by the absence of the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement, exited in the fourth quarter of 2009, and lower tax charges, transaction expenses and compensation expenses.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claimsdecreased 90%, primarily driven by lower net credit losses of $632 million and a larger reserve builds.release of $325 million.

Assetsdeclined 42% versus the prior-year quarter due to asset sales in the current quarter (approximately $15 billion), amortization and prepayments, partially offset by the impact of the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

3Q093Q10 YTD vs. 3Q083Q09 YTD

        Revenues, net of interest expense, increased 8% or $1.7$6.0 billion mainlyprimarily due to an increase in fixed income markets of $5.8 billionfavorable net revenue marks relative to $19.7 billion reflecting strong trading results, particularly inthe prior-year period. Revenues for the first nine months of 2010 include positive marks of $2.0 billion on subprime-related direct exposures and second quartersnon-credit accretion of 2009,$1.0 billion, partially offset partiallyby write-downs on commercial real estate of $355 million and on Alt-A mortgages of $333 million.

Operating expensesdecreased 41% mainly driven by lower volumes, lower transaction expenses, and the absence of the U.S. government loss-sharing agreement.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claimsdecreased 91%, primarily driven by a $3.0 billion decrease in lending revenues of $4.0 billion tonet credit losses versus the prior-year period.


Table of Contents

negative $2.0 billion (mainly from losses on credit default swap hedges).

        The following table provides details of the composition ofOperating expensesSAP decreased 22% or $2.7 billion driven by lower compensation due to headcount reductions and benefits from re-engineering and expense management.

Provisions for credit losses increased 76% or $710 million to $1.6 billion mainly from increased credit reserve builds on funded loans and higher provisions for unfunded lending commitments.

Third Quarter Revenue Impacting Citicorp—Securities and Banking

        While notassets as significant as in prior quarters, certain items continued to impact Securities and Banking revenues during the third quarter of 2009. These items are set forth in the table below.September 30, 2010.

 
 Pretax Revenue
(in millions)
 
 
 Third
Quarter
2009
 Third
Quarter
2008
 

Private Equity and equity investments

 $79 $(50)

Alt-A Mortgages(1)(2)

  142  (221)

Commercial Real Estate (CRE) positions(1)(3)

  20  130 

CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option

  (955) 1,526 

CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers

  (722) 1,178 
      

Total significant revenue items

 $(1,436)$2,563 
      
 
 Assets within Special Asset Pool as of
September 30, 2010
 
In billions of dollars Carrying
value
of assets
 Face value Carrying value
as % of face
value
 

Securities in Available-for-Sale (AFS)

          
 

Corporates

 $7.1 $7.3  97%
 

Prime and non-U.S. mortgage-backed securities (MBS)

  1.7  2.1  81 
 

Auction rate securities (ARS)

  2.0  2.5  80 
 

Other securities

  0.7  0.9  78 
        

Total securities in AFS

 $11.5 $12.8  90%
        

Securities in Held-to-Maturity (HTM)

          
 

Prime and non-U.S. MBS

 $8.5 $10.5  81%
 

Alt-A mortgages

  9.0  17.6  51 
 

Corporates

  6.3  7.0  90 
 

ARS

  1.0  1.2  83 
 

Other securities

  3.1  4.1  76 
        

Total securities in HTM

 $27.9 $40.4  69%
        

Loans, leases and letters of credit (LCs) in Held-for-Investment (HFI)/Held-for-Sale (HFS)(1)

          
 

Corporates

 $9.6 $10.6  91%
 

Commercial real estate (CRE)

  7.1  7.4  96 
 

Other

  2.0  2.4  83 
 

Loan loss reserves

  (2.5)   NM 
        

Total loans, leases and LCs in HFI/HFS

 $16.2 $20.5  79%
        

Mark to market

          
 

Subprime securities

 $0.2 $1.6  13%
 

Other securities(2)

  8.7  32.2  27 
 

Derivatives

  6.8  NM  NM 
 

Loans, leases and letters of credit

  3.1  4.6  67 
 

Repurchase agreements

  5.7  NM  NM 
        

Total mark-to-market

 $24.5  NM  NM 
        

Highly leveraged finance commitments

 $2.0 $2.8  69%

Equities (excludes ARS in AFS)

  5.8  NM  NM 

Monolines

  0.5  NM  NM 

Consumer and other(3)

  6.6  NM  NM 
        

Total

 $95.0       
        

(1)
HFS accounts for approximately $1.4 billion of the total.

(2)
Includes $4.6 billion of ARS and $1.4 billion of corporate securities.

(3)
Includes $1.6 billion of small business banking and finance loans and $1.0 billion of personal loans.

Notes: Assets previously held by the Citi-advised SIVs have been allocated to the corresponding asset categories above.SAPhad total CRE exposures of $10.5 billion at September 30, 2010, which included unfunded commitments of $2.2 billion.SAPhad total subprime assets of $2.3 billion at September 30, 2010, including assets of $1.0 billion of subprime-related direct exposures and $1.3 billion of trading account positions, which includes securities purchased from CDO liquidations.

Excludes Discontinued Operations.

Totals may not sum due to rounding.

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents

Items Impacting SAP Revenues

        The table below provides additional information regarding the net revenue marks affecting theSAP during the third quarters of 2010 and 2009.

 
 Pretax revenue 
In millions of dollars Third
Quarter
2010
 Third
Quarter
2009
 

Subprime-related direct exposures(1)

 $160 $1,967 

CVA related to exposure to monoline insurers

  61  (61)

Alt-A mortgages(2)(3)

  (6) (196)

CRE positions(2)(4)

  (123) (485)

CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers(2)

  19  (61)

SIV assets

  (4) (40)

Private equity and equity investments

  87  (21)

Highly leveraged loans and financing commitments(5)

    (24)

ARS proprietary positions(6)

  109   

CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option

  (3) (64)
      

Subtotal

 $300 $1,015 

Accretion on reclassified assets(7)

  267  502 
      

Total selected revenue items

 $567 $1,517 
      

(1)
Net of impact from hedges against direct subprime asset-backed security (ABS) collateralized debt obligation (CDO) super senior positions.

(2)
Net of hedges.

(2)(3)
For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency residential mortgage-backed securitiesMBS (RMBS) where (i) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (ii) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral composed of full documentation loans. See "Loan and Credit Details—U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending."

(3)(4)
SecuritiesExcludes CRE positions in SIV assets.

(5)
Net of underwriting fees.

(6)
Excludes gains of $23 million and Banking's commercial real estate exposure is split into three categories of assets: held at fair value; held to maturity/held for investment; and equity. See "Exposure to Commercial Real Estate" below for a further discussion.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Citi's Debt Liabilities for Which Citi Has Elected the Fair Value Option

        The Company is required to use its own credit spreads$6 million in determining the current value of its derivative liabilities and all other liabilities for which it has elected the fair value option. When Citi's credit spreads widen (deteriorate), Citi recognizes a gain on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has decreased. When Citi's credit spreads narrow (improve), Citi recognizes a loss on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has increased. The approximately $955 million of losses recorded by Securities and Banking on its fair value option liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) during the third quarter of 2010 and 2009, was principally due to the narrowing (improving) of the Company's credit spreads.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Derivative Positions, excluding Monoline insurers

        The approximately $722 million of pretax losses recorded by Securities and Banking on its derivative positions during the third quarter of 2009 was due to the narrowing of the Company's credit default swap spreads on its derivative liabilities. These losses were partially offset by gains due to the narrowing of the credit spreads of the Company's counterparties on its derivative assets. See "Derivatives—Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives" below for a further discussion.


Table of Contents


TRANSACTION SERVICES

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $1,393 $1,422  (2)%$4,254 $4,031  6%

Non-interest revenue

  1,064  1,144  (7) 3,060  3,431  (11)
              

Revenues, net of interest expense

 $2,457 $2,566  (4)%$7,314 $7,462  (2)%

Operating expenses

  1,141  1,252  (9) 3,303  3,847  (14)

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

  (7) (11) 36  (1) 2  NM 
              

Income before taxes and noncontrolling interest

 $1,323 $1,325   $4,012 $3,613  11%

Income taxes

  384  407  (6)% 1,195  1,095  9 

Income from continuing operations

  939  918  2  2,817  2,518  12 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  5  9  (44) 4  26  (85)
              

Net income

 $934 $909  3%$2,813 $2,492  13%
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $60 $70  (14)%$59 $72  (18)%

Return on assets

  6.18% 5.17%    6.37% 4.62%   
              

Revenues by region:

                   
 

North America

 $643 $540  19%$1,888 $1,557  21%
 

EMEA

  845  953  (11) 2,549  2,784  (8)
 

Latin America

  337  378  (11) 1,020  1,092  (7)
 

Asia

  632  695  (9) 1,857  2,029  (8)
              

Total revenues

 $2,457 $2,566   $7,314 $7,462  (2)%
              

Net income (loss) from continuing operations by region:

                   
 

North America

 $152 $94  62%$471 $243  94%
 

EMEA

  308  348  (11) 984  925  6 
 

Latin America

  148  159  (7) 458  451  2 
 

Asia

  331  317  4  904  899  1 
              

Total net income from continuing operations

 $939 $918  2%$2,817 $2,518  12%
              

Key Indicators(in billions of dollars)

                   

Average deposits and other customer liability balances

 $314 $273  15%         

EOP assets under custody(in trillions of dollars)

 $11.8 $11.9  (1)         
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, were $2.5 billion, down $109 million or 4%respectively, from strong prior-year performance due to spread compression (as global rates declined) and lower volumes as well as negative foreign exchange impact. This was partly offset by strong growth in liability balances and higher trade fees.

Operating expenses declined 9% or $111 million to $1.1 billion, driven by headcount reductions, re-engineering efforts, expense management initiatives and a benefit from FX translation.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, of $7.3 billion decreased slightly from the prior period driven primarily by the impact of lower fee revenues and negative foreign exchange. Average liability balances grew 6% driven by strong growth in North America as a result of successful implementation of deposit growth strategy.

Operating expenses declined 14%, driven by headcount reduction and re-engineering benefits.


Table of Contents


CITI HOLDINGS

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 
 

Net interest revenue

 $4,024 $5,766  (30)%$13,902 $17,292  (20)%
 

Non-interest revenue

  2,670  (5,062) NM  11,994  (19,027) NM 
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $6,694 $704  NM $25,896 $(1,735) NM 
              

Provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

                   
 

Net credit losses

 $6,250 $3,603  73%$19,090 $9,332  NM 
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  338  3,224  (90) 4,743  6,790  (30)%
              
 

Provision for loan losses

 $6,588 $6,827  (4)%$23,833 $16,122  48%
 

Provision for benefits & claims

  310  273  14  923  805  15 
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

    (70) 100  80  (138) NM 
              
 

Total provision for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $6,898 $7,030  (2)%$24,836 $16,789  48%
              

Total operating expenses

 $3,202 $5,136  (38)%$11,417 $16,406  (30)%
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $(3,406)$(11,462) 70%$(10,357)$(34,930) 70%

Provision (benefits) for income taxes

  (1,588) (4,526) 65  (4,562) (13,619) 67 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $(1,818)$(6,936) 74%$(5,795)$(21,311) 73%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  49  (109) NM  (1) (87) 99 
              

Citi Holding's net income (loss)

 $(1,867)$(6,827) 73%$(5,794)$(21,224) 73%
              

Balance Sheet Data (in billions)

                   

Total EOP assets

 $617 $775  (20)%         

Total EOP deposits

  90  83  8          
              

NM    Not meaningful


Table of Contents


BROKERAGE AND ASSET MANAGEMENT

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $(56)$318  NM $460 $727  (37)%

Non-interest revenue

  726  1,776  (59)% 14,250  6,224  NM 
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $670 $2,094  (68)%$14,710 $6,951  NM 
              

Total operating expenses

 $358 $2,085  (83)%$3,000 $6,537  (54)%
              
  

Net credit losses

   $1  (100)%$3 $11  (73)%
  

Credit reserve build (release)

 $(11) (3) NM  35  7  NM 
  

Provision for benefits and claims

  38  58  (34) 113  155  (27)
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $27 $56  (52)%$151 $173  (13)%
              

Income from continuing operations before taxes

 $285 $(47) NM $11,559 $241  NM 

Income taxes

  146  10  NM  4,548  145  NM 
              

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $139 $(57) NM $7,011 $96  NM 

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  16  (98) NM  5  (60) NM 
              

Net income

 $123 $41  NM $7,006 $156  NM 
              

EOP assets(in billions of dollars)

 $59 $62  (5)%         

EOP deposits (in billions of dollars)

  60 $53  13          
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 68% primarily driven by the decrease in the Company's share of Smith Barney revenue resulting from the joint venture transaction. Revenues in the prior-year period included a $347 million pre-tax gain on sale of CitiStreet and charges related to settlementbuy-backs of auction rate securities (ARS) of $306 million pre-tax. 2009 third quarter revenue includes a $320 million pre-tax gain on the sale of the Managed Futures business to the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture.

Operating expenses decreased 83% from the prior-year period, mainly driven by the absence of Smith Barney expenses and the absence of restructuring expenses in retail alternative investments.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased by 52% mainly reflecting lower provisions for benefits and claims.

End of Period Assets include approximately $24 billion of assets of discontinued operations held for sale.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $7.8 billion due to an $11.1 billion pre-tax gain on sale ($6.7 billion after-tax) on the Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture transaction, which closed on June 1, 2009. Excluding the gain, revenues declined $3.3 billion driven by the absence of Smith Barney revenues.

(7)
Recorded as well as the impact of market conditions on Smith Barney transactional and fee-based revenue compared to the prior year.

Operating expenses decreased $3.5 billion primarily driven by the absence of Smith Barney expenses, lower variable compensation and re-engineering efforts, particularly in retail alternative investments.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims declined 13% mainly reflecting lower provisions for benefits and claims.


Table of Contents


LOCAL CONSUMER LENDING

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
 
 %
Change
 %
Change
 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $3,453 $4,612  (25)%$10,730 $14,015  (23)%

Non-interest revenue

  1,194  820  46  4,300  5,141  (16)
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $4,647 $5,432  (14)%$15,030 $19,156  (22)%
              

Total operating expenses

 $2,611 $2,847  (8)%$7,746 $9,094  (15)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $4,929 $3,487  41%$14,617 $9,116  60%
 

Credit reserve build (release)

  604  2,702  (78) 5,003  5,858  (15)
 

Provision for benefits and claims

  272  215  27  810  650  25 
              

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

 $5,805 $6,404  (9)%$20,430 $15,624  31%
              

Loss from continuing operations before taxes

 $(3,769)$(3,819) 1%$(13,146)$(5,562) NM 

Income taxes (benefits)

  (1,670) (1,534) (9) (5,435) (2,196) NM 
              

Loss from continuing operations

 $(2,099)$(2,285) 8%$(7,711)$(3,366) NM 

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

  13  1  NM  23  13  77%
              

Net loss

 $(2,112)$(2,286) 8%$(7,734)$(3,379) NM 
              

Average assets(in billions of dollars)

 $384 $456  (16)%$397 $471  (16)%

Net credit losses as a % of average loans

  6.11% 3.83%            
              

NM    Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 14% due to lower net interest margin, partially offset by increased Cards securitization revenues of $0.7 billion.Net interest revenue was 25% lower than the prior year due to lower balances and the impact of delinquencies and loan modifications in Real Estate, North America Consumer Finance, and Cards. Net interest revenue as a percent of average loans decreased 98 basis points from the prior-year quarter in North America (ex Cards) and decreased 99 basis points in International, due principally to volume decreases. Average loans decreased 12%, with North America (ex Cards) down 10%, North America Cards down 19%, and International down 19%.Non-interest revenue increased 46% reflecting the increased revenue from Cards securitization.

Operating expenses declined 8% primarily due to lower volumes and reductions from expense re-engineering actions, partially offset by higher real estate owned (OREO) and collection costs.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims decreased 9% from the prior period reflecting lower reserve builds of $2.1 billion, partially offset by increased net credit losses of $1.4 billion, primarily in Real Estate and EMEA. The credit reserve build for the quarter included $350 million related to the UK Cards portfolio which was transferred to held-for-sale. The net credit loss ratio increased 228 basis points from the prior-year quarter with North America (ex Cards) up 184 basis points to 4.78%, International up 375 basis points to 9.77%, and North America Cards up 575 basis points to 14.58%.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased 22% due to a decline in net interest revenue, higher net credit losses flowing through the securitization trusts in North America and a higher FDIC assessment.Net interest revenue was 23% lower than the prior year driven by lower balances (due to run-off and credit tightening) and spread compression due largely to higher non-accrual loans, the higher FDIC assessment and the impact of loan modifications.Non-interest revenue declined 16% primarily due to higher credit costs flowing through the securitization trusts in North America and lower securitization gains. Year-to-date non-interest revenue for 2009 also included a $1.1 billion pretax gain on the sale of the Company's remaining stake in Redecard as compared to a prior-year period pre-tax gain on sale of Redecard of $663 million.

Operating expenses decreased 15% primarily due to re-engineering actions, lower volumes and marketing expenses and the absence of prior-year repositioning charges. The declines in expenses were partially offset by higher OREO and collections costs.

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims increased 31% reflecting higher net credit losses of $5.5 billion, partially offset by decreased reserve builds of $855 million.


Table of Contents

        The following table provides additional information, as of September 30, 2009, regarding the Local Consumer Lending loan details. For additional information on loans within Local Consumer Lending, see "Loan and Credit Details—Consumer Loan Details" below.

Composition of Loans within
Local Consumer Lending
 Carrying Value of Assets September 30, 2009 
in billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 June 30,
2009
 % of Assets under U.S.
Government Loss-
Sharing Agreement(1)
 Net credit
loss ratio
 90+ Days
Past Due %
 

North America

                
 

First mortgages

 $123.3 $126.9  66% 3.46% 10.12%
 

Second mortgages

  56.9  59.4  87  7.70  3.01 
 

Student

  26.5  26.6    0.39  3.25 
 

Cards (Retail Partners)

  21.7  22.8  4  14.58  4.08 
 

Personal and Other

  19.3  20.1  10  10.17  3.32 
 

Auto

  15.0  16.2  72  6.61  1.83 
 

Commercial Real Estate

  10.8  11.1  88  2.42  2.38 
            

Total North America

 $273.5 $283.1  56%. 5.61% 6.26%
            

International

                
 

EMEA

 $26.1 $28.6    7.69% 4.52%
 

Asia

  10.9  11.4    14.71  2.40 
 

Latin America

  0.3  0.3    19.14  1.74 
            

Total International

 $37.3 $40.3    9.77% 3.88%
            

Total

 $310.8 $323.4  49% 6.11% 5.97%
            

(1)
See "Government Programs—U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement" below for a description of the agreement.revenue.

Note:        Totals may not sum due to rounding.


Table of Contents


SPECIAL ASSET POOL

 
 Third Quarter  
 Nine Months  
 
In millions of dollars
 2009 2008 % Change 2009 2008 % Change 

Net interest revenue

 $627 $836  (25)%$2,712 $2,550  6%

Non-interest revenue

  750  (7,658) NM  (6,556) (30,392) 78 
              

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $1,377 $(6,822) NM $(3,844)$(27,842) 86%
              

Total operating expenses

 $233 $204  14%$671 $775  (13)%
              
 

Net credit losses

 $1,321 $115  NM $4,470 $205  NM 
 

Provision for unfunded lending commitments

    (70) 100% 80  (138) NM 
 

Credit reserve builds (release)

  (255) 525  NM  (295) 925  NM 
              

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

 $1,066 $570  87%$4,255 $992  NM 
              

Income (Loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $78 $(7,596) NM $(8,770)$(29,609) 70%

Income taxes (benefits)

  (64) (3,002) 98% (3,675) (11,568) 68 
              

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $142 $(4,594) NM $(5,095)$(18,041) 72%

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  20  (12) NM  29  (40) 28 
              

Net Income (loss)

 $122 $(4,582) NM $(5,066)$(18,001) 72%
              

EOP assets(in billions of dollars)

 $182 $261  (31)%         
              

NM
Not meaningful

3Q09 vs. 3Q08

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $8.2 billion primarily due to favorable net revenue marks relative to the prior-year quarter, which are described in more detail below. Revenue in the current quarter included positive marks of $2.0 billion on subprime-related direct exposures and non-credit accretion of $502 million, partially offset by write-downs on CRE of $586 million and $506 million of other write-downs and losses.

Operating expenses increased 14% driven by the USG loss-sharing agreement (see "Government Programs—U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement" below), partially offset by lower compensation expenses.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased $496 million primarily driven by $1.2 billion in increased net credit losses, partially offset by a lower provision of $780 million.

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased $24.0 billion primarily due to favorable net revenue marks relative to the prior year. Revenue year-to-date included a $1.2 billion positive CVA on derivative positions, excluding monoline insurers, and positive marks of $284 million on subprime-related direct exposures, offset by negative revenue of $1.1 billion on Alt-A mortgages. Revenue year-to-date was also negatively impacted by $3.4 billion related to CVA on fair value option liabilities and monolines, CRE, and negative marks for private equity positions.

Operating expenses decreased 13% mainly driven by lower volumes and lower transaction expenses.

Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims increased $3.3 billion primarily driven by the $4.3 billion increase in write-offs over the prior period. Significant write-offs included exposures in Lyondell Basell. The net $295 million net credit reserve release in the current period was driven by a $2.1 billion release for specific counterparties (including Lyondell Basell), partially offset by builds for specific counterparties.

Assets declined 30% versus the prior year primarily driven by amortization/prepayments, sales, and marks/charge-offs.


Table of Contents

        The following table provides details of the composition of the Special Asset Pool assets as of September 30, 2009.

Assets within Special Asset Pool

 
 Carrying Value of Assets September 30, 2009 
in billions of dollars
 September 30,
2009
 June 30,
2009
 % of Assets under U.S.
Government Loss-Sharing
Program(1)
 Face Value Carrying value
as % of Face
Value
 

Securities in AFS/HTM(2)

                
 

Corporates

 $14.8 $17.1  4%$15.1  98%
 

Prime and Non-U.S. MBS

  16.0  16.2  33  20.2  80 
 

Auction Rate Securities

  8.0  8.3  15  10.8  74 
 

Alt-A mortgages

  9.0  9.5  99  17.5  52 
 

Government Agencies

  0.7  6.2    0.8  97 
 

Other Securities(3)

  6.3  7.4  35  8.7  73 
            

Total Securities in AFS/HTM

 $54.8 $64.7  33%$72.9  75%
            

Loan, leases & LC in HFI/HFS(4)

                
 

Corporates

 $26.4 $28.2  33%$28.4  93%
 

Commercial Real Estate (CRE)

  15.3  15.8  65  16.7  92 
 

Other

  3.7  4.7    4.3  85 
 

Loan Loss Reserves

  (4.0) (4.1) NM  NM  NM 
            

Total Loan, leases & LC in HFI/HFS

 $41.4 $44.6  NM  NM  NM 
            

Mark to Market

                
 

Subprime securities(5)

 $8.0 $8.0   $20.9  38%
 

Other Securities(6)

  6.9  8.4  8% 29.5  24 
 

Derivatives

  9.4  10.8    NM  NM 
 

Loans, Leases and Letters of Credit

  7.3  7.8  28  11.5  63 
 

Repurchase agreements

  6.9  7.3    NM  NM 
            

Total Mark to Market

 $38.5 $42.1  9% NM  NM 
            

Highly Lev. Fin. Commitments

 $3.5 $4.6  5%$6.1  57%

Equities (excludes ARS in AFS)

  12.9  13.8    NM  NM 

SIVs

  16.2  16.2  36  21.0  77 

Monolines

  1.3  1.7    NM  NM 

Consumer and Other(7)

  13.3  13.2  NM  NM  NM 
            

Total

 $181.9 $201.0          
            

(1)
See "Government Programs—U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement" below.

(2)
AFS accounts for approximately one-third of the total.

(3)
Includes CRE ($2.2 billion), Municipals ($1.5 billion) and ABS ($1.6 billion).

(4)
HFS accounts for approximately $1.1 billion of the total.

(5)
These $8.0 billion of assets are reflected in the exposures set forth under "U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposure in Citi Holdings—Special Asset Pool" below.

(6)
Includes $3.2 billion of Corporates and $0.7 billion of CRE.

(7)
Includes $4.8 billion of Small Business Banking & Finance loans.

Table of Contents

Items Impacting Special Asset Pool Revenues

        The table below provides additional information regarding the favorable net revenue marks affecting the Special Asset Pool during the third quarter of 2009.

 
 Pretax Revenue
(in millions)
 
 
 Third
Quarter
2009
 Third
Quarter
2008
 

Sub-prime related direct exposures(1)(2)

 $1,967 $(394)

Private Equity and equity investments

  (20) (430)

Alt-A Mortgages(1)(3)

  (196) (932)

Highly leveraged loans and financing commitments(4)

  (24) (792)

Commercial Real Estate (CRE) positions(1)(5)

  (594) (649)

Structured Investment Vehicles' (SIVs) Assets

  (40) (2,004)

Auction Rate Securities (ARS) proprietary positions

    (166)

CVA related to exposure to monoline insurers

  (61) (920)

CVA on Citi debt liabilities under fair value option

  (64)  

CVA on derivatives positions, excluding monoline insurers

  43  (64)
      

Subtotal

 $1,011 $(6,351)

Accretion on reclassified assets

  502   
      

Total significant revenue items

 $1,513 $(6,351)
      

(1)
Net of hedges.

(2)
See "U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposures in Citi Holdings—Special Asset Pool" below for a further discussion of the related risk exposures and the associated marks recorded.

(3)
For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency RMBS where (i) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (ii) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral composed of full documentation loans. See "Loan and Credit Details—U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending".

(4)
Net of underwriting fees. See "Highly Leveraged Financing Transactions" below for a further discussion.

(5)
The aggregate $594 million is comprised primarily of $497 million, net of hedges, on exposures recorded at fair value and $104 million of losses on equity method investments. Citi Holdings' CRE exposure is split into three categories of assets: held at fair value; held to maturity/held for investment; and equity. See "Exposure to Commercial Real Estate" below for a further discussion.

Credit Valuation Adjustment Related to Monoline Insurers

        CVA is calculated by applying forward default probabilities, which are derived using the counterparty's current credit spread, to the expected exposure profile. The exposure primarily relates to hedges on super senior subprime exposures that were executed with various monoline insurance companies. See "Direct Exposure to Monolines" below for a further discussion.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Citi's Debt Liabilities for Which Citi Has Elected the Fair Value Option

        The Company is required to use its own credit spreads in determining the current value for its derivative liabilities and all other liabilities for which it has elected the fair value option. When Citi's credit spreads widen (deteriorate), Citi recognizes a gain on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has decreased. When Citi's credit spreads narrow (improve), Citi recognizes a loss on these liabilities because the value of the liabilities has increased. The approximately $64 million of losses recorded by Citi Holdings on its fair value option liabilities (excluding derivative liabilities) during the third quarter of 2009 was principally due to the narrowing (improving) of the Company's credit spreads.

Credit Valuation Adjustment on Derivative Positions, excluding Monoline insurers

        The approximately $43 million net gain on Citi Holdings' derivative positions during the third quarter of 2009 was due to the narrowing of the Company's counterparties on its derivative assets. See "Derivatives—Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives" below for a further discussion.

Accretion on Reclassified Assets

        In the fourth quarter of 2008, Citi Holdings reclassified $33.3 billion of debt securities from trading securities to HTM investments, $4.7 billion of debt securities from trading securities to AFS, and $15.7 billion of loans from held-for-sale to held-for-investment. All assets were reclassified with an amortized cost equal to the fair value on the date of reclassification. The difference between the amortized cost basis and the expected principal cash flows is treated as a purchase discount and accreted into income over the remaining life of the security or loan. During the third quarter of 2009, Citi Holdings recognized approximately $502 million of interest revenue from this accretion.


Table of Contents


CORPORATE/OTHER

        Corporate/Other includes global staff functions (including finance, risk, human resources, legal and compliance) and other corporate expense, global operations and technology, residual Corporate Treasury and corporate items.

        At September 30, 2010, this segment had approximately $279 billion of assets, consisting primarily of Citi's liquidity portfolio. The Student Loan Corporation is reported as Discontinued Operations within the Corporate/Other segment for the third quarter of 2010 period only.

 
 Third Quarter Nine Months 
In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

Net interest revenue

 $(461)$(678)$(1,216)$(1,794)

Non-interest revenue

  1,132  212  1,646  (413)
          

Total Revenues, net of interest expense

 $671 $(466)$430 $(2,207)

Total operating expenses

  441  (77) 864  18 

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

    1  1  1 
          

Income (Loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $230  (390)$(435)$(2,226)

Income taxes (benefits)

  128  (203) 145  (818)
          

Income (Loss) from continuing operations

 $102 $(187)$(580)$(1,408)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  (418) 613  (677) 578 
          

Net Income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $(316)$426 $(1,257)$(830)

Net Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

         
          

Net Income (loss)

 $(316)$426 $(1,257)$(830)
          
 
 Third Quarter Nine Months 
In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

Net interest revenue

 $252 $(461)$894 $(1,210)

Non-interest revenue

  344  1,133  714  1,641 
          

Total revenues, net of interest expense

 $596 $672 $1,608 $431 
          

Total operating expenses

 $428 $440 $1,239 $863 

Provisions for loan losses and for benefits and claims

  (1) 1    3 
          

Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes

 $169 $231 $369 $(435)

Income taxes (benefits)

  78  134  185  151 
          

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 $91 $97 $184 $(586)

(Loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

  (374) (418) (166) (677)
          

Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

 $(283)$(321)$18 $(1,263)

Net (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (51)   (51) (2)
          

Net income (loss)

 $(232)$(321)$69 $(1,261)
          

3Q093Q10 vs. 3Q083Q09

        Revenues, net of interest expense, decreased primarily due to the absence of the pretax gain related to the exchange of preferred stock in 2009, offset partially by gains on sales of AFS securities, benefits from lower short-term interest rates and other improved Treasury results during the current quarter.

3Q10 YTD vs. 3Q09 YTD

Revenues, net of interest expense, increased primarily due to gains on sales of AFS securities, benefits from lower short-term interest rates and other improved Treasury results, offset partially by the absence of the pretax gain related to the preferred exchange, partly offset by the interest cost of the trust preferred securities.referenced above.

        Operating Expensesexpenses increased by 44% primarily due to intersegment eliminationscompensation-related costs and the absencelegal reserve charges.


Table of prior-year reserve releases.Contents

3Q09 YTD vs. 3Q08 YTDSEGMENT BALANCE SHEET AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

In millions of dollars Regional
Consumer
Banking
 Institutional
Clients
Group
 Subtotal
Citicorp
 Citi
Holdings
 Corporate/Other
and
Consolidating
Eliminations
 Total
Citigroup
Consolidated
 

Assets

                   
 

Cash and due from banks

 $8,203 $16,320 $24,523 $1,203 $616 $26,342 
 

Deposits with banks

  8,593  49,006  57,599  5,081  87,391  150,071 
 

Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

  270  233,793  234,063  5,994    240,057 
 

Brokerage receivables

  208  25,664  25,872  11,181  85  37,138 
 

Trading account assets

  12,503  301,347  313,850  23,248    337,098 
 

Investments

  34,863  104,755  139,618  55,427  145,205  340,250 
 

Loans, net of unearned income

                   
 

Consumer

  223,034    223,034  240,070    463,104 
 

Corporate

    169,468  169,468  21,739    191,207 
              
 

Loans, net of unearned income

 $223,034 $169,468 $392,502 $261,809 $ $654,311 
 

Allowance for loan losses

  (13,856) (3,515) (17,371) (26,303)   (43,674)
              
 

Total loans, net

 $209,178 $165,953 $375,131 $235,506 $ $610,637 
 

Goodwill

  10,347  10,808  21,155  4,642    25,797 
 

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)

  2,254  987  3,241  4,464    7,705 
 

Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)

  1,546  75  1,621  2,355    3,976 
 

Other assets

  31,689  54,279  85,968  40,877  45,955  172,800 
 

Assets of discontinued operations

        31,409    31,409 
              

Total assets

 $319,654 $962,987 $1,282,641 $421,387 $279,252 $1,983,280 
              

Liabilities and equity

                   
 

Total deposits

 $300,268 $456,882 $757,150 $82,327 $10,618 $850,095 
 

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

  4,946  186,676  191,622  264  179  192,065 
 

Brokerage payables

  176  51,092  51,268    249  51,517 
 

Trading account liabilities

  36  139,727  139,763  2,242    142,005 
 

Short-term borrowings

  137  58,776  58,913  1,046  27,054  87,013 
 

Long-term debt

  3,284  75,504  78,788  12,610  295,932  387,330 
 

Other liabilities

  18,819  22,717  41,536  15,619  21,043  78,198 
 

Liabilities of discontinued operations

        29,874    29,874 
 

Net inter-segment funding (lending)

  (8,012) (28,387) (36,399) 277,405  (241,006)  
 

Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

         $162,913 $162,913 
 

Noncontrolling interest

          2,270  2,270 
              

Total equity

          165,183  165,183 
              

Total liabilities and equity

 $319,654 $962,987 $1,282,641  421,387 $279,252 $1,983,280 
              

        The supplemental information presented above reflects Citigroup's consolidated GAAP balance sheet by reporting segment as of September 30, 2010. The respective segment information depicts the assets and liabilities managed by each segment as of such date. While this presentation is not defined by GAAP, Citi believes that these non-GAAP financial measures enhance investors' understanding of the balance sheet components managed by the underlying business segments, as well as the beneficial inter-relationship of the asset and liability dynamics of the balance sheet components among Citi's business segments.


Table of Contents


CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

CAPITAL RESOURCES

Overview

        Revenues,netHistorically, Citi has generated capital by earnings from its operating businesses. However, Citi may augment, and during the recent financial crisis did augment, its capital through issuances of interest expense, increasedcommon stock, convertible preferred stock, preferred stock, equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans, and, in the case of regulatory capital, through the issuance of subordinated debt underlying trust preferred securities. Further, the impact of future events on Citi's business results, such as corporate and asset dispositions, as well as changes in regulatory and accounting standards, also affects Citi's capital levels.

        Capital is used primarily to support assets in Citi's businesses and to absorb market, credit or operational losses. While capital may be used for other purposes, such as to pay dividends or repurchase common stock, Citi's ability to utilize its capital for these purposes is currently restricted due to its agreements with the pretax gainU.S. government, generally for so long as the U.S. government continues to hold Citi's common stock or trust preferred securities.

        Citigroup's capital management framework is designed to ensure that Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with Citi's risk profile and all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines, as well as external rating agency considerations. The capital management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is reviewed at the consolidated, legal entity and country levels.

        Senior management is responsible for the capital management process mainly through Citigroup's Finance and Asset and Liability Committee (FinALCO), with oversight from the Risk Management and Finance Committee of Citigroup's Board of Directors. FinALCO is composed of the senior-most management of Citigroup for the purpose of engaging management in decision-making and related todiscussions on capital and liquidity matters. Among other things, FinALCO's responsibilities include: determining the preferred exchange, intersegment eliminations,financial structure of Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries; ensuring that Citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized in consultation with its regulators; determining appropriate asset levels and return hurdles for Citigroup and individual businesses; reviewing the funding and capital markets plan for Citigroup; and setting and monitoring corporate and bank liquidity levels, and the impact of currency translation on non-U.S. capital.

Capital Ratios

        Citigroup is subject to the risk-based capital guidelines issued by the Federal Reserve Board. Historically, capital adequacy has been measured, in part, based on two risk-based capital ratios, the Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) ratios. Tier 1 Capital consists of the sum of "core capital elements," such as qualifying common stockholders' equity, as adjusted, qualifying noncontrolling interests, and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts, principally reduced by goodwill, other disallowed intangible assets, and disallowed deferred tax assets. Total Capital also includes "supplementary" Tier 2 Capital elements, such as qualifying subordinated debt and a limited portion of the allowance for credit losses. Both measures of capital adequacy are stated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets.

        In 2009, the U.S. banking regulators developed a new measure of capital termed "Tier 1 Common," which is defined as Tier 1 Capital less non-common elements, including qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests, and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts. For more detail on all of these capital metrics, see "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.

        Citigroup's risk-weighted assets are principally derived from application of the risk-based capital guidelines related to the measurement of credit risk. Pursuant to these guidelines, on-balance-sheet assets and the credit equivalent amount of certain off-balance-sheet exposures (such as financial guarantees, unfunded lending commitments, letters of credit, and derivatives) are assigned to one of several prescribed risk-weight categories based upon the perceived credit risk associated with the obligor, or if relevant, the guarantor, the nature of the collateral, or external credit ratings. Risk-weighted assets also incorporate a measure for market risk on covered trading account positions and all foreign exchange and commodity positions whether or not carried in the trading account. Excluded from risk-weighted assets are any assets, such as goodwill and deferred tax assets, to the extent required to be deducted from regulatory capital. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.

        Citigroup is also subject to a Leverage ratio requirement, a non-risk-based measure of capital adequacy, which is defined as Tier 1 Capital as a percentage of quarterly adjusted average total assets.

        To be "well capitalized" under current federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a bank holding company must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital ratio of at least 10%, and a Leverage ratio of at least 3%, and not be subject to a Federal Reserve Board directive to maintain higher capital levels. The following table sets forth Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.


Table of Contents

Citigroup Regulatory Capital Ratios

 
 Sept. 30,
2010
 Dec. 31,
2009
 

Tier 1 Common

  10.33% 9.60%

Tier 1 Capital

  12.50% 11.67 

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)

  16.14% 15.25 

Leverage

  6.57% 6.87 
      

        As noted in the table above, Citigroup was "well capitalized" under the current federal bank regulatory agency definitions as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines

In millions of dollars September 30,
2010
 December 31,
2009
 

Tier 1 Common

       

Citigroup common stockholders' equity

 $162,601 $152,388 

Less: Net unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale, net of tax(1)

  (997) (4,347)

Less: Accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax

  (3,305) (3,182)

Less: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax(2)

  (3,500) (3,461)

Less: Cumulative effect included in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to the change in own credit worthiness, net of tax(3)

  662  760 

Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets(4)

  34,303  26,044 

Less: Intangible assets:

       
 

Goodwill

  25,797  25,392 
 

Other disallowed intangible assets

  5,242  5,899 

Other

  (706) (788)
      

Total Tier 1 Common

 $103,693 $104,495 
      

Qualifying perpetual preferred stock

 $312 $312 

Qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts

  20,321  19,217 

Qualifying noncontrolling interests

  1,121  1,135 

Other

    1,875 
      

Total Tier 1 Capital

 $125,447 $127,034 
      

Tier 2 Capital

       

Allowance for credit losses(5)

 $12,971 $13,934 

Qualifying subordinated debt(6)

  22,569  24,242 

Net unrealized pretax gains on available-for-sale equity securities(1)

  971  773 
      

Total Tier 2 Capital

 $36,511 $38,949 
      

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital and Tier 2 Capital)

 $161,958 $165,983 
      

Risk-weighted assets(7)

 $1,003,458 $1,088,526 
      

(1)
Tier 1 Capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, in accordance with risk-based capital guidelines. In arriving at Tier 1 Capital, banking organizations are required to deduct net unrealized losses on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax. Banking organizations are permitted to include in Tier 2 Capital up to 45% of net unrealized pretax gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values.

(2)
The Federal Reserve Board granted interim capital relief for the impact of ASC 715-20,Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefits Plans (formerly SFAS 158).

(3)
The impact of including Citigroup's own credit rating in valuing financial liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected is excluded from Tier 1 Capital, in accordance with risk-based capital guidelines.

(4)
Of Citi's approximately $51 billion of net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2010, approximately $14 billion of such assets were includable without limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $34 billion of such assets exceeded the limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as "disallowed deferred tax assets," were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 Capital. Citigroup's approximately $3 billion of other net deferred tax assets primarily represented approximately $1 billion of deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities and approximately $2 billion of deferred tax effects of the pension liability adjustment, which are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to limitation under the guidelines. Citi had approximately $26 billion of disallowed deferred tax assets at December 31, 2009.

(5)
Includable up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Any excess allowance for credit losses is deducted in arriving at risk-weighted assets.

(6)
Includes qualifying subordinated debt in an amount not exceeding 50% of Tier 1 Capital.

(7)
Includes risk-weighted credit equivalent amounts, net of applicable bilateral netting agreements, of $62.5 billion for interest rate, commodity, and equity derivative contracts, foreign exchange contracts, and credit derivatives as of September 30, 2010, compared with $64.5 billion as of December 31, 2009. Market risk equivalent assets included in risk-weighted assets amounted to $56.3 billion at September 30, 2010 and $80.8 billion at December 31, 2009. Risk-weighted assets also include the effect of certain other off-balance-sheet exposures, such as unused lending commitments and letters of credit, and reflect deductions such as certain intangible assets and any excess allowance for credit losses.

Table of Contents

Adoption of SFAS 166/167 Impact on Capital

        As previously disclosed, the adoption of SFAS 166/167 had a significant and immediate impact on Citigroup's capital ratios as of January 1, 2010.

        As described further in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the adoption of SFAS 166/167 resulted in the consolidation of $137 billion of incremental assets and $146 billion of liabilities onto Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet, including securitized credit card receivables on the date of adoption, January 1, 2010. The adoption of SFAS 166/167 also resulted in a net increase of $10 billion in risk-weighted assets. In addition, Citi added $13.4 billion to the loan loss allowance, increased deferred tax assets by $5.0 billion, and reduced retained earnings by $8.4 billion. This translated into a decrease in Tier 1 Common, Tier 1 Capital, and Total Capital of $14.2 billion, $14.2 billion and $14.0 billion, respectively, and a reduction in Tangible Common Equity (described below) of $8.4 billion, which were partially offset by net income of $4.4 billion and $2.3 billion of qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts issued during the first quarter of 2010.

        The impact on Citigroup's capital ratios from the January 1, 2010 adoption of SFAS 166/167 was as follows:

As of January 1, 2010Impact

Tier 1 Common

(138) bps

Tier 1 Capital

(141) bps

Total Capital

(142) bps

Leverage

(118) bps

TCE (TCE/RWA)

(87) bps

        For more information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements below.

Common Stockholders' Equity

        Citigroup's common stockholders' equity increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 by $10.2 billion to $162.6 billion, and represented 8.2% of total assets as of September 30, 2010.

        The table below summarizes the change in Citigroup's common stockholders' equity during the first nine months of 2010:

In billions of dollars  
 

Common stockholders' equity, December 31, 2009

 $152.4 

Transition adjustment to retained earnings associated with the adoption of SFAS 166/167 (as of January 1, 2010) and the adoption of ASU 2010-11 (recorded on July 1, 2010)

  (8.5)

Net income

  9.3 

Employee benefit plans and other activities

  2.0 

ADIA Upper DECs equity units purchase contract

  3.8 

Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

  3.6 
    

Common stockholders' equity, September 30, 2010

 $162.6 
    

        As of September 30, 2010, $6.7 billion of stock repurchases remained under Citi's authorized repurchase programs. No material repurchases were made in the first nine months of 2010, or the year ended December 31, 2009. For so long as the U.S. government holds any Citigroup common stock or trust preferred securities, Citigroup has generally agreed not to acquire, repurchase or redeem any Citigroup equity or trust preferred securities, other than pursuant to administering its employee benefit plans or other customary exceptions, or with the consent of the U.S. government.

Tangible Common Equity (TCE)

        TCE, as defined by Citigroup, representsCommon equity lessGoodwill andIntangible assets (other thanMortgage Servicing Rights (MSRs)), net of the related net deferred taxes. Other companies may calculate TCE in a manner different from that of Citigroup. Citi's TCE was $129.0 billion at September 30, 2010 and $118.2 billion at December 31, 2009.

        The TCE ratio (TCE divided by risk-weighted assets) was 12.9% at September 30, 2010 and 10.9% at December 31, 2009.

        TCE is a capital adequacy metric used and relied upon by industry analysts; however, it is a non-GAAP financial measure for SEC purposes. A reconciliation of Citigroup's total stockholders' equity to TCE follows:

In millions of dollars Sept. 30,
2010
 Dec. 31,
2009
 

Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

 $162,913 $152,700 

Less:

       
 

Preferred stock

  312  312 
      

Common equity

 $162,601 $152,388 

Less:

       
 

Goodwill

  25,797  25,392 
 

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)

  7,705  8,714 
 

Related net deferred tax assets

  59  68 
      

Tangible common equity (TCE)

 $129,040 $118,214 
      

Tangible assets

       

GAAP assets

 $1,983,280 $1,856,646 
 

Less:

       
  

Goodwill

  25,797  25,392 
  

Intangible assets (other than MSRs)

  7,705  8,714 
  

Related deferred tax assets

  361  386 

Federal bank regulatory reclassification

    5,746 
      

Tangible assets (TA)

 $1,949,417 $1,827,900 
      

Risk-weighted assets (RWA)

 $1,003,458 $1,088,526 
      

TCE/TA ratio

  6.62% 6.47%
      

TCE/RWA ratio

  12.86% 10.86%
      

Table of Contents

Capital Resources of Citigroup's Depository Institutions

        Citigroup's U.S. subsidiary depository institutions are also subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board. To be "well capitalized" under current regulatory definitions, Citigroup's depository institutions must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) ratio of at least 10%, and a Leverage ratio of at least 5%, and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels.

        At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, all of Citigroup's U.S. subsidiary depository institutions including Citigroup's primary subsidiary depository institution, Citibank, N.A., were "well capitalized" under current federal bank regulatory agency definitions, as noted in the following table:

Citibank, N.A. Components of Capital and Ratios Under Regulatory Guidelines

In billions of dollars Sept. 30,
2010
 Dec. 31,
2009
 

Tier 1 Common

 $103.6 $95.8 

Tier 1 Capital

  104.5  96.8 

Total Capital (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital)

  117.9  110.6 
      

Tier 1 Common ratio

  14.52% 13.02%

Tier 1 Capital ratio

  14.64  13.16 

Total Capital ratio

  16.52  15.03 

Leverage ratio(1)

  9.04  8.31 
      

(1)
Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average total assets.

        Similar to pending changes to capital standards applicable to Citigroup and its broker-dealer subsidiaries, as discussed below, the capital requirements applicable to Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions may be subject to change in light of actions currently being considered, particularly at the regulatory level. Citigroup will continue to monitor these developments closely.

        There are various legal and regulatory limitations on the ability of Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions to pay dividends to Citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries. In determining the declaration of dividends, each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and Leverage ratio requirements, as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Citigroup did not receive any dividends from its bank subsidiaries during the first nine months of 2010. See also "Funding and Liquidity—Other" below.


Table of Contents

Impact of Changes on Capital Ratios

        The following table presents the estimated sensitivity of Citigroup's and Citibank, N.A.'s capital ratios to changes of $100 million in Tier 1 Common, Tier 1 Capital, or Total Capital (numerator), or changes of $1 billion in risk-weighted assets or adjusted average total assets (denominator), based on financial information as of September 30, 2010. This information is provided for the purpose of analyzing the impact that a change in Citigroup's or Citibank, N.A.'s financial position or results of operations could have on these ratios. These sensitivities only consider a single change to either a component of capital, risk-weighted assets, or adjusted average total assets. Accordingly, an event that affects more than one factor may have a larger basis point impact than is reflected in this table.


Tier 1 Common ratioTier 1 Capital ratioTotal Capital ratioLeverage ratio

Impact of $100
million change in
Tier 1 Common
Impact of $1
billion change in
risk-weighted
assets
Impact of $100
million change in
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of $1
billion change in
risk-weighted
assets
Impact of $100
million change in
Total Capital
Impact of $1
billion change in
risk-weighted
assets
Impact of $100
million change in
Tier 1 Capital
Impact of $1
billion change in
adjusted average
total assets

Citigroup

1.0 bps1.0 bps1.0 bps1.2 bps1.0 bps1.6 bps0.5 bps0.3 bps

Citibank, N.A. 

1.4 bps2.0 bps1.4 bps2.1 bps1.4 bps2.3 bps0.9 bps0.8 bps

Broker-Dealer Subsidiaries

        At September 30, 2010, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., a broker-dealer registered with the SEC that is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), had net capital, computed in accordance with the SEC's net capital rule, of $9.0 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement by $8.2 billion.

        In addition, certain of Citi's broker-dealer subsidiaries are subject to regulation in the other countries in which they do business, including requirements to maintain specified levels of net capital or its equivalent. Citigroup's broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with their capital requirements at September 30, 2010.

        Similar to pending changes to capital standards applicable to Citigroup, as discussed under "Regulatory Capital and Liquidity Standards Developments" below, net capital requirements applicable to Citigroup's broker-dealer subsidiaries in the U.S. and other jurisdictions will be subject to change in light of the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Financial Reform Act) and other actions currently being considered, particularly at the regulatory level. Citi will continue to monitor these developments closely.

Regulatory Capital and Liquidity Standards Developments

        The prospective regulatory capital and liquidity standards for financial institutions are currently subject to significant debate, rulemaking activity and uncertainty, both in the U.S. as well as internationally. Citi will continue to monitor these developments closely.

        Basel II and III.    In late 2005, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee) published a new set of risk-based capital standards (Basel II) which would permit banks, including Citigroup, to leverage internal risk models used to measure credit, operational, and market risk exposures to drive regulatory capital calculations. In late 2007, the U.S. banking regulators adopted these standards for large banks, including Citigroup. As adopted, the standards require Citigroup, as a large and internationally active bank, to comply with the most advanced Basel II approaches for calculating credit and operational risk capital requirements. The U.S. implementation timetable consists of a parallel calculation period under the current regulatory capital regime (Basel I) and Basel II, followed by a three-year transitional period.

        Citi began parallel reporting on April 1, 2010. There will be at least four quarters of parallel reporting before Citi enters the three-year transitional period. U.S. regulators have reserved the right to change how Basel II is applied in the U.S. following a review at the end of the second year of the transitional period, and to retain the existing prompt corrective action and leverage capital requirements applicable to banking organizations in the U.S. Citigroup intends to implement Basel II within the timeframe required by the U.S. regulators.

        Apart from the Basel II rules regarding credit and operational risks, in June 2010 the Basel Committee proposed revisions to the market risk capital framework which could also result in additional capital requirements.

        Further, as an outgrowth of the financial crisis, the Basel Committee undertook to establish global financial reforms designed to strengthen existing capital requirements as well as set forth new liquidity risk measures (Basel III). The Basel III effort, which began with the issuance of capital and liquidity proposals in December 2009, and which were subsequently partially amended, culminated with the announcement by the Basel Committee in September 2010 as to agreement with respect to the calibration of the risk-based capital ratios and newly introduced Leverage ratio, the planned approach for the proposed liquidity ratios, and transitional arrangements for implementing all of the new requirements.

        Under these standards, when fully phased-in on January 1, 2019, Citigroup would be required to maintain risk-based capital ratios as follows:

 
 Tier 1
Common
 Tier 1
Capital
 Total
Capital
 

Stated Minimum Ratio

  4.5% 6.0% 8.0%

Plus: Capital Conservation Buffer Requirement

  2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
        

Effective Minimum Ratio

  7.0% 8.5% 10.5%
        

        While banking organizations may draw on the 2.5% capital conservation buffer to absorb losses during periods of financial or economic stress, restrictions on earnings distributions (e.g., dividends, equity repurchases, and discretionary compensation) would ensue, with the degree of such restrictions greater based upon the extent to which the buffer is utilized. Moreover, subject to national discretion by the respective bank supervisory or regulatory authorities, a countercyclical capital buffer ranging from 0% – 2.5%,


Table of Contents

consisting of common equity or other fully loss absorbing capital, would also be invoked on banking organizations when it is deemed that excess aggregate credit growth is resulting in a build-up of systemic risk in a given country. This countercyclical capital buffer, when in effect, would serve as an additional buffer supplementing the capital conservation buffer.

        As a systemically important financial institution, Citigroup may also be subject to additional capital requirements. The Basel Committee and the Financial Stability Board are currently developing an integrated approach to systemically important financial institutions which could include combinations of capital surcharges, contingent capital, and bail-in debt.

        The Basel Committee's objective of strengthening the quality, consistency and transparency of banking organizations' regulatory capital base is not only evidenced by formalizing the desired predominance of Tier 1 Common capital through a substantial effective minimum ratio requirement, but is also demonstrated by requiring that Tier 1 Common capital be measured after applying generally all regulatory adjustments (including applicable deductions). The impact of these regulatory adjustments on Tier 1 Common capital would be phased-in incrementally at 20% annually beginning on January 1, 2014, with full implementation by January 1, 2018. During the transition period, the portion of the regulatory adjustments (including applicable deductions) not applied against Tier 1 Common capital would continue to be subject to existing national treatments.

        Further, under Basel III, certain capital instruments would no longer qualify as non-common components of Tier 1 Capital (e.g., trust preferred securities and cumulative perpetual preferred stock) or Tier 2 Capital. These instruments would be subject to a 10% per-year phase-out over 10 years beginning on January 1, 2013 (although this phase-out period will be substantially shorter in the U.S. as a result of the so-called "Collins Amendment" to the Financial Reform Act discussed below), except for certain limited grandfathering. In addition, the Basel Committee is considering a proposal that would require capital instruments to contain mandatory write-down or common stock conversion features in order to qualify as components of Tier 1 or Tier 2 Capital.

        Although U.S. banking organizations, such as Citigroup, are currently subject to a supplementary, non-risk-based measure of leverage for capital adequacy purposes (see "Capital Ratios" above), Basel III would establish a more constrained Leverage ratio requirement. Initially, during a four-year parallel run beginning on January 1, 2013, banking organizations will be required to maintain a minimum 3% Tier 1 Capital Leverage ratio. Disclosure of such ratio, and its components, would start on January 1, 2015. Depending upon the results of the parallel run test period, there could be subsequent adjustments to the Leverage ratio, which is targeted to be finalized in 2017 and a formal requirement by January 1, 2018.

        The Basel Committee also proposed the establishment of two formal measures intended to strengthen liquidity risk management and supervision, a short-term Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) as well as a long-term, structural, Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR). The LCR, which would become a minimum standard on January 1, 2015 (after an observation period beginning in 2011), has been designed to ensure banking organizations maintain an adequate level of unencumbered cash and high quality unencumbered assets that can be converted into cash to meet liquidity needs. The NSFR would be introduced as a minimum requirement by January 1, 2018 (after an observation period beginning in 2012), and is designed to promote the medium and long-term funding of assets and activities over a one-year time horizon. Both ratios must be at least 100%.

        Certain of the Basel III rules are currently expected to be ratified as final in November 2010 and published by January 2011. The U.S. banking agencies will then be required to finalize, within two years, the rules to be applied by U.S. banking organizations commencing on January 1, 2013.

        Financial Reform Act.    In addition to the implementation of Basel II and Basel III, the Financial Reform Act grants new regulatory authority to various U.S. federal regulators, including the Federal Reserve Board and a newly created Financial Stability Oversight Council (Oversight Council), to impose heightened prudential standards on financial institutions such as Citigroup. These standards could include heightened capital, leverage and liquidity standards, as well as requirements for periodic stress tests. The Federal Reserve Board will also have discretion to impose other prudential standards, including contingent capital requirements, and will retain important flexibility to distinguish among bank holding companies such as Citigroup based on their perceived riskiness, complexity, activities, size and other factors.

        Further, the so-called "Collins Amendment" to the Financial Reform Act will result in new minimum capital requirements for bank holding companies such as Citigroup, and could require Citigroup to replace certain of its outstanding securities that are currently counted towards Citi's Tier 1 Capital requirements, such as trust preferred securities, over a period of time.


Table of Contents


FUNDING AND LIQUIDITY

Overview

        Citi's funding and liquidity objective is to both fund its existing asset base and maintain sufficient excess liquidity so that it can operate under a wide variety of market conditions. A wide range of liquidity scenarios are considered based on both historical industry experience and hypothetical situations. The approach is to ensure Citi has sufficient funding that is structural in nature so as to accommodate market disruptions for both short- and long-term periods. Due to various constraints that limit the free transfer of liquidity or capital between Citi-affiliated entities (as discussed below), Citigroup's primary liquidity objectives are established by entity and in aggregate across:

        Citigroup's goal is to make certain that there is sufficient funding to ensure that aggregate liquidity resources are available for these two entities. The primary sources of funding include (i) deposits via Citi's bank subsidiaries, which are Citi's lowest-cost source of long-term funding, (ii) long-term debt (including trust preferred securities and other long-term collateralized financing) issued at the parent and broker-dealer and certain bank subsidiaries, and (iii) stockholders' equity. These sources are supplemented by a modest amount of short-term borrowings, primarily in the form of commercial paper and secured financing (securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase) at the Citigroup parent and broker-dealer.

        Citigroup works to ensure that the structural tenor of these funding sources is sufficiently long in relation to the tenor of its asset base. In fact, the key goal of Citi's asset-liability management is to ensure that there is excess tenor in the liability structure so as to provide excess liquidity to fund the assets. The net tenor profile of this excess liquidity can effectively offset potential draws on liquidity that may occur under stress. This excess funding is held in the form of the aggregate liquidity resources, as described below.

        For additional information on prospective regulatory liquidity standards for financial institutions such as Citi, see "Capital Resources—Regulatory Capital and Liquidity Standards Developments" above.

Aggregate Liquidity Resources

 
 Parent & Broker-Dealer Significant Bank Entities Total 
In billions of dollars
 Sept. 30,
2010
 Jun. 30,
2010
 Sept. 30,
2009
 Sept. 30,
2010
 Jun. 30,
2010
 Sept. 30,
2009
 Sept. 30,
2010
 Jun. 30,
2010
 Sept. 30,
2009
 

Cash at major central banks

 $16.1 $24.7 $19.6 $79.1 $86.0 $148.8 $95.2 $110.7 $168.4 

Unencumbered Liquid Securities

  73.9  56.8  56.4  161.7  143.4  59.4  235.6  200.2  115.8 
                    

Total

 $90.0 $81.5 $76.0 $240.8 $229.4 $208.2 $330.8 $310.9 $284.2 
                    

        As noted in the table above, Citigroup's aggregate liquidity resources totaled $330.8 billion at September 30, 2010, compared with $310.9 billion at June 30, 2010 and $284.2 billion at September 30, 2009. These amounts are as of quarter-end, and may increase or decrease intra-quarter in the ordinary course of business. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the intra-quarter amounts did not fluctuate materially from the quarter-end amounts noted above.

        At September 30, 2010, Citigroup's parent and broker-dealer "cash box" totaled $90.0 billion, an increase of $8.5 billion from June 30, 2010 and compared with $76.0 billion at September 30, 2009. This includes the liquidity portfolio and "cash box" held in the United States as well as government bonds held by Citigroup's broker-dealer entities in the United Kingdom and Japan.

        Citigroup's bank subsidiaries had an aggregate of approximately $79.1 billion of cash on deposit with major central banks (including the U.S. Federal Reserve Banks, European Central Bank, Bank of England, Swiss National Bank, Bank of Japan, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority) at September 30, 2010, compared with approximately $86 billion at June 30, 2010 and $148.8 billion at September 30, 2009.

        Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also have significant additional liquidity resources through unencumbered highly liquid government and government-backed securities. These securities are available for sale or secured funding through private markets or by pledging to the major central banks. The value of these liquid securities was $161.7 billion at September 30, 2010, compared with $143.4 billion at June 30, 2010 and $59.4 billion at September 30, 2009. Significant amounts of cash and liquid securities are also available in other Citigroup entities.

        In addition to the highly liquid securities noted above, Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also maintain additional unencumbered securities and loans, which are currently pledged to the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks' and U.S. Federal Reserve Banks discount window.

Deposits

        Citi views its deposit base within its bank subsidiaries as its most stable and lowest-cost funding source. Citi continues to focus on maintaining a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base that stood at approximately $850 billion at September 30, 2010, as compared with $814 billion at June 30, 2010 and $828 billion at March 31, 2010. Approximately 60% of the deposit increase from the second quarter of 2010 to the third quarter of 2010 was driven by FX translation, with the rest primarily driven by an increase in deposits in our internationalTransaction Services businesses. Citigroup's deposits are diversified across clients, products and regions, with approximately 64% outside of the United States as of September 30, 2010. The Financial Reform Act,


Table of Contents

signed into law on July 21, 2010, permanently increased the statutory standard maximum deposit insurance amount for U.S. deposits to $250,000 per depositor.

Long-Term Debt

        Long-term debt is an important funding source because of its multi-year maturity structure. At September 30, 2010, long-term debt outstanding for Citigroup, was as follows:

In billions of dollars Parent &
Broker-Dealer
 Bank Total
Citigroup(1)
 

Long-term debt(2)

 $271.2 $116.1(3)$387.3 

(1)
Includes $69.6 billion of long-term debt related to VIEs consolidated effective January 1, 2010 with the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

(2)
Of this amount, approximately $59.6 billion is guaranteed by the FDIC under the TLGP with $1.3 billion maturing in the remainder of 2010, $20.3 billion maturing in 2011 and $38 billion maturing in 2012.

(3)
At September 30, 2010, approximately $18.5 billion relates to collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

        The table below details the long-term debt issuances of Citigroup during the past five quarters.

In billions of dollars
 3Q09 4Q09 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 

Unsecured long-term debt issued under TLGP guarantee

 $10.0 $10.0 $ $ $ 

Unsecured long-term debt issued without TLGP guarantee:

  12.6  4.6(1) 1.3  4.4(2) 6.8 

Unsecured long-term debt issued by local country

  2.7  2.5  1.7  1.0  2.1 

Trust Preferred Securities (TRUPS)

  27.1    2.3     

Secured Debt & Securitizations

  5.2  2.7  2.0     
            

Total

 $57.6 $19.8 $7.3 $5.4 $8.9 
            

(1)
Includes approximately $1.9 billion of senior debt issued under remarketing of an equal amount of trust preferred securities held by Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) to enable ADIA to execute the forward stock purchase contract in March 2010.

(2)
Includes approximately $1.9 billion of senior debt issued under remarketing of an equal amount of trust preferred securities held by ADIA to enable ADIA to execute the forward stock purchase contract in September 2010.

Liquidity Ratios

        Structural liquidity ensures that the asset base is funded by sufficiently long-dated liabilities. The structural liquidity ratio, defined as the sum of deposits, long-term debt and stockholders' equity as a percentage of total assets, measures this in broad terms. Citi's structural liquidity ratio was 71% at September 30, 2010, virtually unchanged from June 30, 2010 and compared with 72% at September 30, 2009.

        Another measure of Citi's structural liquidity is cash capital. Cash capital is a more detailed measure of the ability to fund the structurally illiquid portion of Citigroup's balance sheet than traditional measures, such as deposits to loans or core deposits to loans. Cash capital measures the amount of long-term funding (>1 year) available to fund illiquid assets. Long-term funding includes core customer deposits, long-term debt and equity. Illiquid assets include loans (net of sale/securitization adjustments), illiquid securities, securities haircuts and other assets (i.e., goodwill, intangibles, fixed assets, receivables, etc.). At September 30, 2010, both the parent and broker-dealer and the aggregate bank subsidiaries had a significant excess of cash capital.

        In addition, as of September 30, 2010, the parent and broker-dealer maintained liquidity to meet all maturing obligations significantly in excess of a one-year period without access to the unsecured wholesale markets.

Short-Term Borrowings

        As noted above, Citi supplements its primary sources of funding with a modest amount of short-term borrowings. Short-term borrowings primarily consist of commercial paper, borrowings from banks and other market participants and secured financing (securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase).

        At September 30, 2010, commercial paper outstanding for Citigroup's parent and broker-dealer and bank subsidiaries, respectively, was as follows:

In billions of dollars Parent &
Broker-Dealer
 Bank(1) Total
Citigroup
 

Commercial paper

 $9.6 $26.6 $36.2 
        

(1)
Includes $26.6 billion of commercial paper related to VIEs consolidated effective January 1, 2010 with the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

        As noted in the footnote to the table above, $26.6 billion of the commercial paper outstanding at September 30, 2010 reflects the consolidation of VIEs pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 166/167 effective January 1, 2010. The VIE consolidation led to an increase in bank subsidiary commercial paper, while parent and broker-dealer commercial paper remained at recent levels. For the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the average outstanding commercial paper was approximately $35 billion.

        The short-term borrowings line on Citi's balance sheet at September 30, 2010 also includes $41.8 billion of borrowings from banks and other market participants, which includes borrowing from the Federal Home Loan Banks. The average balance of borrowings from banks and other market


Table of Contents

participants for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 was approximately $46 billion.

        Secured financing is conducted through Citi's broker-dealer subsidiaries to facilitate customer matched-book activity and to efficiently fund a portion of the trading inventory. At September 30, 2010, secured financing was $192.1 billion and averaged approximately $203 billion during the three months ended September 30, 2010.

        The majority of this secured financing is collateralized by highly liquid government and government-backed securities. Of the remainder, a portion relates to matched-book transactions that are part of the business activity of secured lending to customers, which appears as an asset on Citi's Consolidated Balance Sheet ("Securities Borrowed or Purchased Under Agreements to Resell"). These matched-book transactions have matching tenor profiles resulting in minimal funding requirements. The balance of secured financing that is not matched-book transactions is carefully calibrated by asset quality, tenor and counterparty exposure and, as discussed above, supplement Citi's other sources of funding.

        See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail on Citigroup's and its affiliates' outstanding long-term debt and short-term borrowings.

Liquidity Transfer Between Entities

        Liquidity is generally transferable across the various affiliates of the parent and broker-dealer, subject to standard legal terms. Similarly, the parent and broker-dealer can generally transfer excess liquidity into its bank subsidiaries, such as Citibank, N.A. In addition, Citigroup's bank subsidiaries, including Citibank, N.A., can lend to the Citigroup parent and broker dealer in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. As of September 30, 2010, the amount available for lending under Section 23A was approximately $30 billion, provided the funds are collateralized appropriately.

Funding Outlook

        Citi currently estimates its long-term debt maturing for the full year 2010 is approximately $36 billion (approximately $31.6 billion had matured as of September 30, 2010). Given the current status of Citi's liquidity resources, Citi currently expects to refinance approximately $20 billion of its long-term debt maturing in 2010, and does not expect to refinance its TLGP debt maturing in 2010. As of September 30, 2010, Citi had issued approximately $15.7 billion of long-term debt, and expects to issue approximately $4.5 billion during the rest of 2010. Looking forward, Citi currently estimates its long-term debt maturing during 2011 is approximately $40 billion, and it expects to re-issue approximately $20 billion of this debt during the year. Citi does not expect to refinance its TLGP debt as it matures during 2011 and 2012 (approximately $58 billion). Citi continues to review its funding and liquidity needs and may adjust its expected issuances due to market conditions or regulatory requirements, among other factors.


Table of Contents

Credit Ratings

        Citigroup's ability to access the capital markets and other sources of funds, as well as the cost of these funds and its ability to maintain certain deposits, is dependent on its credit ratings. The table below indicates the current ratings for Citigroup. (As a result of the Citigroup guarantee, changes in U.S. dollar rates, partly offset byratings for CFI are the interest costsame as those of Citigroup.)

Citigroup's Debt Ratings as of September 30, 2010


Citigroup Inc/Citigroup Funding Inc.Citibank, N.A.

Senior
debt
Commercial
paper
Long-
term
Short-
term

Fitch Ratings

A+F1+A+F1+

Moody's Investors Service (Moody's)

A3P-1A1P-1

Standard & Poor's (S&P)

AA-1A+A-1

        The credit rating agencies included in the chart above have each indicated that they are evaluating the impact of the trust preferred securities.Financial Reform Act on the rating support assumptions currently included in their methodologies as related to large U.S. bank holding companies. These evaluations are generally as a result of agencies' belief that the Financial Reform Act increases the uncertainty regarding the U.S. government's willingness to provide extraordinary support to such companies.

        Consistent with such belief and to bring Citi in line with other large U.S. banks, S&P and Moody's revised their outlooks on Citigroup's supported ratings from stable to negative in February and July of 2010, respectively. In addition, Fitch placed Citigroup's supported ratings on rating watch negative in October of 2010, along with most U.S. bank and bank holding companies' support ratings, support floors and other ratings that are sovereign-support dependent. While the ultimate timing of the completion of the credit rating agencies' evaluations, as well as the outcomes, is uncertain, the agencies have indicated that their evaluations for the large, U.S. banks will likely conclude on or around the following time periods:

        Ratings downgrades by Fitch, Moody's or S&P could have material impacts on funding and liquidity through cash obligations, reduced funding capacity and due to intersegment eliminationscollateral triggers. Because of the current credit ratings of Citigroup, a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating may or may not impact Citigroup's commercial paper/short-term rating by one notch. As of September 30, 2010, Citi currently believes that a one-notch downgrade of both the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup and a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup's commercial paper/short-term rating could result in the absenceassumed loss of prior-year reserve releases.unsecured commercial paper ($8.8 billion) and tender option bonds funding ($0.4 billion) as well as derivative triggers and additional margin requirements ($1.1 billion). Other funding sources, such as secured financing and other margin requirements for which there are no explicit triggers, could also be adversely affected. The aggregate liquidity resources of Citigroup's parent and broker-dealer stood at $90.0 billion as of September 30, 2010, in part as a contingency for such an event, and a broad range of mitigating actions are currently included in the Citigroup Contingency Funding Plan. These mitigating factors include, but are not limited to, accessing funding capacity from existing clients, diversifying funding sources, tailoring levels of secured lending, adjusting the size of select trading books, and collateralized borrowings from significant bank subsidiaries.

        Citi currently believes that a more severe ratings downgrade scenario, such as a two-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup, accompanied by a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup's commercial paper/short-term rating, could result in an additional $1.4 billion in funding requirement in the form of cash obligations and collateral.

        Further, as of September 30, 2010, a one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term ratings of Citibank, N.A. could result in an approximate $3.8 billion funding requirement in the form of collateral and cash obligations. Because of the current credit ratings of Citibank, N.A., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating is unlikely to have any impact on its commercial paper/short-term rating. The significant bank entities, Citibank, N.A., and other bank vehicles have aggregate liquidity resources of $241 billion, and have a detailed contingency funding plan that encompasses a broad range of mitigating actions.


Table of Contents


GOVERNMENT PROGRAMSOFF-BALANCE-SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Common Stock Warrants Issued to UST under TARP

        In connection with its participation in TARP in October and December 2008, Citi issued two warrants exercisable for common stock to the UST. These warrants remain outstanding following the completion of the exchange offers.

        The warrant issued to the UST in October 2008 has a term of 10 years, an exercise price of $17.85 per share and is exercisable for approximately 210.1 million shares of common stock. The value ascribed to the warrant, or $1.3 billion out of the $25 billion in cash proceeds, on a relative fair value basis, was recorded in Citigroup's stockholders' equity and resulted in an increase inAdditional paid-in capital.

        The warrant issued to the UST in December 2008 also has a term of 10 years, an exercise price of $10.61 per share and is exercisable for approximately 188.5 million shares of common stock. The value ascribed to the warrant, or $0.5 billion out of the $20 billion in cash proceeds, on a relative fair value basis, was recorded in Citigroup's stockholders' equity and resulted in an increase inAdditional paid-in capital.

        The fair value for the warrants was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The valuation was based on the Citigroup stock price, stock volatility, dividend yield, and the risk free rate on the measurement date for both the issuances.

        See "U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement" below for a description of the third common stock warrant issued, outstanding and held by the UST.

Implementation and Management of TARP Programs

        Citigroup has established a Special TARP Committee composed of senior executives to approve, monitor and track how the USG's TARP funds invested in Citi, or $45 billion, are utilized. Citi is required to adhere to the following objectives as a condition of the USG's capital investments:

        The Committee has established specific guidelines, which are consistent with the objectives and spirit of TARP. Pursuant to these guidelines, Citi will use TARP capital only for those purposes expressly approved by the Committee.

        Committee approval is the final stage in a four-step review process to evaluate proposals from Citi businesses for the use of TARP capital, considering the risk, the potential financial impact and returns.

        On August 11, 2009, Citi published its most recent quarterly report summarizing its TARP spending initiatives for the second quarter of 2009 (the report is available at www.citigroup.com). The report states that the Committee had authorized $50.8 billion in initiatives backed by TARP capital which has subsequently been increased to $53.8 billion. As of September 30, 2009, the Company has deployed approximately $18.3 billion of funds under the approved initiatives.

FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program

        Under the terms of the FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP), the FDIC guaranteed, until the earlier of either its maturity or June 30, 2012 (for qualifying debt issued before April 1, 2009) or December 31, 2012 (for qualifying debt issued on or after April 1, 2009 through October 31, 2009), certain qualifying senior unsecured debt issued by certain Citigroup entities between October 31, 2008 and October 31, 2009 in amounts up to 125% of the qualifying debt for each qualifying entity. The FDIC charged Citigroup a fee ranging from 50 to 150 basis points in accordance with a prescribed fee schedule for any qualifying debt issued with the FDIC guarantee. The TLGP was terminated on October 31, 2009 and        Citigroup and its affiliates have elected not to participatesubsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance-sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs), primarily in any FDIC-approved extension of the program.

        As of September 30, 2009,connection with securitization activities inRegional Consumer Banking andInstitutional Clients Group. Citigroup and its affiliates had issued a totalsubsidiaries use SPEs principally to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of $54.6 billionCitigroup's financial assets, assisting clients in securitizing their financial assets and creating investment products for clients. The adoption of long-term debt that is covered under the FDIC guarantee, with $6.35 billion maturing inSFAS 166/167, effective on January 1, 2010, $18.75 billion maturing in 2011caused certain SPEs, including credit card receivables securitization trusts and $29.5 billion maturing in 2012.

        In addition, as of September 30, 2009, Citigroup, through its subsidiaries, had $4.37 billion in outstandingasset-backed commercial paper and interbank deposits backed by the FDIC. The FDIC also charged a fee ranging from 50conduits, to 150 basis pointsbe consolidated in connection with the issuance of those instruments. As approved by the FDIC, effective October 1, 2009 through the termination of the TLGP program on October 31, 2009, Citigroup issued commercial paper of various tenors without the FDIC guarantee.

        See "Capital Resources and Liquidity" below forCiti's Consolidated Financial Statements. For further information on Citi's fundingsecuritization activities and liquidity programs.

U.S. Government Loss-Sharing Agreement

Background

        On January 15, 2009, Citigroup entered into an agreement with the UST, the FDICinvolvement in SPEs, see Notes 1 and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (collectively referred to in this section as the USG) on losses arising on a $301 billion portfolio of Citigroup assets (valued as of November 21, 2008, other than as set forth in note 114 to the table below). Primarily as a result of the receipt of principal repayment and charge-offs to date, the total asset pool has declined by approximately $50 billion on a GAAP basis to approximately $250.4 billion as of September 30, 2009.

        As consideration for the loss-sharing agreement, Citigroup issued approximately $7.1 billion in preferred stock to the UST and the FDIC, as well as a warrant exercisable for common stock to the UST. As part of the exchange offers, the preferred stock was exchanged for newly issued 8% trust preferred securities. See "Significant Events in the Third Quarter of 2009—Exchange Offers" above. The warrant issued to the UST as consideration for the loss-sharing agreement has a term of 10 years, an exercise price of $10.61 per share and is exercisable for approximately 66.5 million shares of common stock. The fair value of the warrant of $88


Table of ContentsConsolidated Financial Statements.

million was recorded as a credit toAdditional paid-in capital at the time of issuance.

Terms of Agreement

        The loss-sharing agreement extends for 10 years for residential assets and five years for non-residential assets. Under the agreement, a "loss" on a portfolio asset is generally defined to include a charge-off or a realized loss upon collection, through a permitted disposition or exchange, or upon a foreclosure or short-sale loss, but not merely through a change in Citigroup's fair value accounting for the asset or the creation or increase of a related loss reserve. Once a loss is recognized under the agreement, the aggregate amount of qualifying losses across the portfolio in a particular period is netted against the aggregate recoveries and gains across the portfolio, all on a pretax basis.

        The resulting net loss amount on the portfolio is the basis of the loss-sharing agreement between Citigroup and the USG. Citigroup will bear the first $39.5 billion of such net losses, which amount was determined using (i) an agreed-upon $29 billion of first losses, (ii) Citigroup's then-existing reserve with respect to the portfolio of approximately $9.5 billion, and (iii) an additional $1.0 billion as an agreed-upon amount in exchange for excluding the effects of certain hedge positions from the portfolio. Net losses, if any, on the portfolio after Citigroup's losses exceed the $39.5 billion first-loss amount will be borne 90% by the USG and 10% by Citigroup in the following manner:

        Approximately $2.8 billion of GAAP losses on the asset pool were recorded in the third quarter of 2009, bringing the GAAP losses on the portfolio to date to approximately $8.1 billion (i.e., for the period of November 21, 2008 through September 30, 2009). These losses count towards Citigroup's $39.5 billion first-loss position.

        The Federal Reserve Bank of New York will implement its loss-sharing obligations under the agreement, if any, by making a loan in an amount equal to the then aggregate value of the remaining covered asset pool (after reductions for charge-offs, pay-downs and realized losses) as determined in accordance with the agreement. Following the loan, as losses are incurred on the remaining covered asset pool, Citigroup will be required to immediately repay 10% of such losses to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The loan is non-recourse to Citigroup, other than with respect to the repayment obligation in the preceding sentence and interest on the loan. The loan is recourse only to the remaining covered asset pool, which is the sole collateral to secure the loan. The loan will bear interest at the overnight index swap rate plus 300 basis points.

        The covered asset pool includes U.S.-based exposures and transactions that were originated prior to March 14, 2008. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, the USG had a 120-day period, beginning April 15, 2009, to review the asset pool to confirm asset eligibility. The USG has completed its review and, in October 2009, substantially agreed with Citigroup on the final asset pool's composition. The USG's final approval of the pool is expected in November 2009. After final approval of the pool, the USG has the right to review and confirm Citigroup's first-loss position ($39.5 billion) and the consideration paid by Citigroup for the loss coverage, each based on expected losses and reserves associated with the final pool (using a methodology and assumptions consistent with those used to set the $39.5 billion first-loss position). The USG is expected to complete this review in the fourth quarter of 2009.

        The agreement includes guidelines for governance and asset management with respect to the covered asset pool, including reporting requirements and notice and approval rights of the USG at certain thresholds. If covered losses exceed $19 billion, the USG may increase the required reporting or alter the thresholds for notice and approval. If covered losses exceed $27 billion, the USG has the right to replace Citi as the asset manager for the covered asset pool, among other things.

Accounting and Regulatory Capital Treatment

        Citigroup accounts for the loss-sharing agreement as an indemnification agreement pursuant to the guidance in ASC 805-20-30-18,Business Combinations. Citigroup recorded an asset of $3.617 billion (equal to the fair value of the consideration issued to the USG) inOther assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The asset will be amortized as anOther operating expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income on a straight-line basis over the coverage periods of 10 years and five years, respectively, based on the relative initial principal amounts of each group. During the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2009, Citigroup recorded $122 million and $412 million, respectively, as anOther operating expense.

        Under indemnification accounting, recoveries (gains), if any, will be recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income in the same future periods that cumulative losses recorded under U.S. GAAP on the covered assets exceed the $39.5 billion first-loss amount. The Company will recognize and measure an indemnification asset on the same basis that it recognizes losses on the covered assets in the Consolidated Statement of Income. For example, for a covered loan classified as held-for-investment and reported in the balance sheet at amortized cost, the Company would recognize and measure an indemnification asset due from the USG at the same time related loan loss reserves are recorded for that loan equal to 90% of the amount of the loan loss reserve, subject to the first-loss limitation.

        Further, under indemnification accounting, recoveries (gains) may be recorded at times when such amounts are not contractually receivable from the USG based on the definition of covered losses in the loss-sharing agreement. Such amounts may or may not thereafter become contractually receivable, depending upon whether or not they become covered "losses" (see above for definition of covered "loss"). Indemnification accounting matches the amount and timing of the recording of recoveries with the amount and timing of the recognition of losses based on the U.S. GAAP accounting for the covered assets, as opposed to the amount and timing of recognition as defined in the loss-sharing agreement. The indemnification asset amount recorded will be adjusted, as appropriate, to take into consideration additional revenue and expense amounts related to the covered assets specifically defined as


Table of Contents

recoverable or non-recoverable in the loss-sharing program.

        The covered assets are risk-weighted at 20% for purposes of calculating the Tier 1 Capital ratio at September 30, 2009.

Asset Values as of September 30, 2009

        The following table summarizes the assets that were part of the covered asset pool agreed to between Citigroup and the USG as of January 15, 2009, with their values as of November 21, 2008 (except as set forth in note 1 to the table below), and the balances as of September 30, 2009, reflecting changes in the balances of assets that remained qualified, plus approximately $10 billion of replacement assets that Citi substituted for non-qualifying assets between January 15, 2009 and April 15, 2009. The $250.4 billion of covered assets at September 30, 2009 are recorded in Citi Holdings within Local Consumer Lending ($171.9 billion) and Special Asset Pool ($78.5 billion). As discussed above, the asset pool, as revised, remains subject to the USG's final approval, which is expected in November 2009.

Assets

In billions of dollars September 30,
2009
 November 21,
2008(1)
 

Loans:

       
 

First mortgages

 $81.0 $98.0 
 

Second mortgages

  49.6  55.4 
 

Retail auto loans

  10.8  16.2 
 

Other consumer loans

  17.6  19.7 
      

Total consumer loans

 $159.0 $189.3 
      
 

CRE loans

 $10.8 $12.0 
 

Highly leveraged finance loans

  0.2  2.0 
 

Other corporate loans

  10.5  14.0 
      

Total corporate loans

 $21.5 $28.0 
      

Securities:

       
 

Alt-A

 $9.1 $11.4 
 

SIVs

  5.8  6.1 
 

CRE

  1.5  1.4 
 

Other

  8.2  11.2 
      

Total securities

 $24.6 $30.1 
      

Unfunded lending commitments (ULC)

       
 

Second mortgages

 $18.3 $22.4 
 

Other consumer loans

  2.4  3.6 
 

Highly leveraged finance

  0.0  0.1 
 

CRE

  3.8  5.5 
 

Other commitments

  20.8  22.0 
      

Total ULC

 $45.3 $53.6 
      

Total covered assets

 $250.4 $301.0 
      

(1)
As a result of the initial confirmation process (conducted between November 21, 2008 and January 15, 2009), the covered asset pool includes approximately $99 billion of assets considered "replacement" assets (assets that were added to the pool to replace assets that were in the pool as of November 21, 2008 but were later determined not to qualify). Loss-sharing on qualifying losses incurred on these replacement assets was effective beginning January 15, 2009, instead of November 21, 2008.

Table of Contents


MANAGING GLOBAL RISK

        Citigroup's risk management framework balances strong corporate oversight with well-defined independent risk management functions for each business and region, as well as cross-business product expertise. The Citigroup risk management framework is described in Citigroup's 20082009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


LOAN AND CREDIT DETAILSRISK

Loan and Credit Overview

        During the third quarter of 2010, Citigroup's aggregate loan portfolio decreased by $37.9 billion to $654.3 billion. Citi's total allowance for loan losses totaled $43.7 billion at September 30, 2010, a coverage ratio of 6.73% of total loans, essentially flat from 6.72% at June 30, 2010 and up from 5.85% at September 30, 2009.

        During the third quarter of 2010, Citi had a net release of $2.0 billion from its credit reserves and allowance for unfunded lending commitments, compared to a net build of $802 million in the third quarter of 2009 and a net release of $1.5 billion in the second quarter of 2010. The release consisted of a net release of $601 million for corporate loans (primarily inSAP) and a net release of $1.4 billion for consumer loans (mainly a $403 million release inRCB and a $953 million release inLCL). Despite the reserve release for consumer loans, the coincident months of net credit loss coverage for the consumer portfolio increased from 15.9 to 16.7 months, significantly higher than the year-ago level of 13.3 months.

        Net credit losses of $7.7 billion during the third quarter of 2010 decreased $3.3 billion from year-ago levels (on a managed basis). The decrease consisted of a net decrease of $2.7 billion for consumer loans (mainly a $2.1 billion decrease inLCL and a $587 million decrease inRCB) and a decrease of $619 million for corporate loans (almost all of which is related toSAP).

        Consumer non-accrual loans (excluding credit card receivables) totaled $12.4 billion at September 30, 2010, compared to $13.8 billion at June 30, 2010 and $18.0 billion at September 30, 2009. For total consumer loans, the 90 days or more past due delinquency rate was 3.38% at September 30, 2010, compared to 3.67% at June 30, 2010 and 4.07% a year ago. The 30 to 89 days past due consumer loan delinquency rate was 3.14% at September 30, 2010, compared to 3.06% at June 30, 2010 and 3.55% a year ago. During the third quarter of 2010, early- and later-stage delinquencies improved on a dollar basis across most of the consumer loan portfolios, driven by improvement in North America mortgages, both in first and second mortgages, Citi-branded cards in Citicorp and Retail partner cards in Citi Holdings. The improvement in first mortgages was driven by asset sales and loans moving from the trial period under HAMP to permanent modification, partially offset by the continued backlog in foreclosures in process. In addition to these improvements, consumer delinquencies declined during the quarter due to the announced sale of SLC, which resulted in moving its loan portfolio to held-for-sale. As a result, SLC is presented as discontinued operations for the third quarter of 2010 only.

        Corporate non-accrual loans were $9.9 billion at September 30, 2010, compared to $11.0 billion at June 30, 2010 and $14.7 billion a year ago. The decrease in non-accrual loans from the prior quarter was mainly due to loan sales, write-offs and paydowns, which were partially offset by increases due to the weakening of certain borrowers.

Loan Accounting Policies

        Citigroup's accounting policies for loans, allowance for loan losses and related lending activities can be found in Citi's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.


Table of Contents


Loans Outstanding

In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars September 30,
2009
 June 30,
2009
 December 31,
2008
 In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 

Consumer loans

Consumer loans

 

Consumer loans

 

In U.S. offices:

 

In U.S. offices

In U.S. offices

 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 $191,748 $197,358 $219,482 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 $158,986 $171,102 $180,334 $183,842 $191,748 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 63,668 67,661 71,360 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 29,455 61,867 69,111 58,099 57,820 

Cards

 36,039 33,750 44,418 

Cards

 120,781 125,337 127,818 28,951 36,039 

Lease financing

 15 16 31 

Commercial and industrial

 4,952 5,540 5,386 5,640 5,848 
       

Lease financing

 3 6 7 11 15 

 $291,470 $298,785 $335,291             
       

 $314,177 $363,852 $382,656 $276,543 $291,470 

In offices outside the U.S.:

 
           

In offices outside the U.S.

In offices outside the U.S.

 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 $47,568 $45,986 $44,382 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 $50,692 $47,921 $49,421 $47,297 $47,568 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 48,027 48,467 44,189 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 39,755 38,115 44,541 42,805 45,004 

Cards

 41,443 42,262 42,586 

Cards

 39,466 37,510 38,191 41,493 41,443 

Commercial and industrial

 11,835 10,947 13,897 

Commercial and industrial

 17,653 16,420 14,828 14,780 14,858 

Lease financing

 345 339 304 

Lease financing

 639 677 771 331 345 
                   

 $149,218 $148,001 $145,358 

 $148,205 $140,643 $147,752 $146,706 $149,218 
                   

Total consumer loans

Total consumer loans

 $440,688 $446,786 $480,649 

Total consumer loans

 $462,382 $504,495 $530,408 $423,249 $440,688 

Unearned income

Unearned income

 803 866 738 

Unearned income

 722 951 1,061 808 803 
                   

Consumer loans, net of unearned income

Consumer loans, net of unearned income

 $441,491 $447,652 $481,387 

Consumer loans, net of unearned income

 $463,104 $505,446 $531,469 $424,057 $441,491 
                   

Corporate loans

Corporate loans

 

Corporate loans

 

In U.S. offices:

 

In U.S. offices

In U.S. offices

 

Commercial and industrial

 $23,345 $30,567 $33,450 

Commercial and industrial

 $11,750 $11,656 $15,558 $15,614 $19,692 

Loans to financial institutions

 7,666 8,181 10,200 

Loans to financial institutions

 29,518 31,450 31,279 6,947 7,666 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 23,221 23,862 16,643 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 21,479 22,453 21,283 22,560 23,221 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 14,081 15,414 15,047 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 16,182 14,812 15,792 17,737 17,734 

Lease financing

 1,275 1,284 1,476 

Lease financing

 1,255 1,244 1,239 1,297 1,275 
                   

 $69,588 $79,308 $76,816 

 $80,184 $81,615 $85,151 $64,155 $69,588 
                   

In offices outside the U.S.:

 

In offices outside the U.S.

In offices outside the U.S.

 

Commercial and industrial

 $73,564 $78,512 $85,492 

Commercial and industrial

 $67,531 $63,355 $62,854 $66,747 $71,759 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 10,949 11,638 23,158 

Installment, revolving credit, and other

 10,586 11,174 10,956 9,683 10,949 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 12,023 11,887 11,375 

Mortgage and real estate(1)

 6,272 7,301 9,771 9,779 12,023 

Loans to financial institutions

 16,906 15,856 18,413 

Loans to financial institutions

 24,019 20,646 19,003 15,113 16,906 

Lease financing

 1,462 1,560 1,850 

Lease financing

 568 582 663 1,295 1,462 

Governments and official institutions

 826 713 385 

Governments and official institutions

 3,179 3,306 3,373 2,949 2,631 
                   

 $115,730 $120,166 $140,673 

 $112,155 $106,364 $106,620 $105,566 $115,730 
                   

Total corporate loans

Total corporate loans

 $185,318 $199,474 $217,489 

Total corporate loans

 $192,339 $187,979 $191,771 $169,721 $185,318 

Unearned income

Unearned income

 (4,598) (5,436) (4,660)

Unearned income

 (1,132) (1,259) (1,436) (2,274) (4,598)
                   

Corporate loans, net of unearned income

Corporate loans, net of unearned income

 $180,720 $194,038 $212,829 

Corporate loans, net of unearned income

 $191,207 $186,720 $190,335 $167,447 $180,720 
                   

Total loans—net of unearned income

Total loans—net of unearned income

 $622,211 $641,690 $694,216 

Total loans—net of unearned income

 $654,311 $692,166 $721,804 $591,504 $622,211 
       

Allowance for loan losses—on drawn exposures

Allowance for loan losses—on drawn exposures

 (36,416) (35,940) (29,616)

Allowance for loan losses—on drawn exposures

 (43,674) (46,197) (48,746) (36,033) (36,416)
                   

Total loans—net of unearned income and allowance for credit losses

Total loans—net of unearned income and allowance for credit losses

 $585,795 $605,750 $664,600 

Total loans—net of unearned income and allowance for credit losses

 $610,637 $645,969 $673,058 $555,471 $585,795 

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans—net of unearned income(2)

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans—net of unearned income(2)

 5.85% 5.60% 4.27%

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans—net of unearned income(2)

 6.73% 6.72% 6.80% 6.09% 5.85%
                   

Allowance for consumer loan losses as a percentage of total consumer loans—net of unearned income(2)

Allowance for consumer loan losses as a percentage of total consumer loans—net of unearned income(2)

 6.44% 6.25% 4.61%

Allowance for consumer loan losses as a percentage of total consumer loans—net of unearned income(2)

 8.16% 7.87% 7.84% 6.70% 6.44%

Allowance for corporate loan losses as a percentage of total corporate loans—net of unearned income

 4.42 4.11 3.48 
                   

Allowance for corporate loan losses as a percentage of total corporate loans—net of unearned income(2)

Allowance for corporate loan losses as a percentage of total corporate loans—net of unearned income(2)

 3.22% 3.59% 3.90% 4.56% 4.42%
           

(1)
Loans secured primarily by real estate.


Table

(2)
The first, second and third quarters of Contents

Loan Accounting Policies

        The following are the Company's accounting policies for Loans, Allowance for Loan Losses and related lending activities.

Loans

        Loans are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income and unamortized deferred fees and costs except that credit card receivable balances also include accrued interest and fees. Loan origination fees and certain direct origination costs are generally deferred and recognized as adjustments to income over the lives of the related loans.

        As described in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company has elected fair value accounting for certain loans. Such2010 exclude loans which are carried at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings. Interest income on such loans is recorded inInterest revenue at the contractually specified rate.

value.

        Loans for which the fair value option has not been elected are classified upon origination or acquisition as either held-for-investment or held-for-sale. This classification is based on management's initial intent and ability with regard to those loans.

        Loans that are held-for-investment are classified asLoans, net of unearned income on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and the related cash flows areCertain lending products included within the cash flows from investing activities category in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows onloan table above have terms that may give rise to additional credit issues. Credit cards with below-market introductory interest rates, multiple loans supported by the line Changes in loans. However, when the initial intent for holding a loan has changed from held-for-investment to held-for-sale, the loan is reclassified to held-for-sale, but the related cash flows continue to be reported in cash flows from investing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows on the line Proceeds from salessame collateral (e.g., home equity loans), and securitizations of loans.

        Substantially all of the consumer loans sold or securitized by Citigroup are U.S. prime residential mortgage loans or U.S. credit card receivables. The practice of the U.S. prime mortgage business has been to sell all of its loans except for nonconforming adjustable rate loans. U.S. prime mortgage conforminginterest-only loans are classified as held-for-sale at the timeexamples of origination. The related cash flows are classified in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in the cash flows from operating activities category on the line Change in loans held-for-sale.

        U.S. credit card receivables are classified at origination as loans-held-for sale to the extent that managementsuch products. However, Citi does not have the intentbelieve these products are material to hold the receivables for the foreseeable future or until maturity. The U.S. credit card securitization forecast for the three months following the latest balance sheet date is the basis for the amount of such loans classified as held-for-sale. Cash flows related to U.S. credit card loans classified as held-for-sale at origination or acquisition are reported in the cash flows from operating activities category on the line Change in loans held-for-sale.

Consumer Loans

        Consumer loans represent loansits financial position and leases managed primarily by theRegional Consumer Banking andLocal Consumer Lending businesses. As a general rule, interest accrual ceases for installment and real estate (both open and closed end) loans when payments are 90 days contractually past due. For credit cards and unsecured revolving loans, however, the Company generally accrues interest until payments are 180 days past due. Citi's charge-off policies follow the general guidelines below:

        For a discussion of the impact of mortgage loan and credit card modification and forbearance programs on Citi's consumer loan businesses, see "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" below.

Corporate Loans

        Corporate loans represent loans and leases managed by ICG or the Special Asset Pool. Corporate loans are identified as impaired and placed on a cash (non-accrual) basis when it is determined that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful or when interest or principal is 90 days past due, except when the loan is well collateralized and in the process of collection. Any interest accrued on impaired corporate loans and leases is reversed at 90 days and charged against current earnings, and interest is thereafter included in earnings only to the extent actually received in cash. When there is doubt regarding the ultimate collectability of principal, all cash receipts are thereafter applied to reduce the recorded investment in the loan.


Table of Contents

        Impaired corporate loans and leases are written down to the extent that principal is judged to be uncollectible. Impaired collateral-dependent loans and leases, where repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying collateral and there are no other available and reliable sources of repayment, are written down to the lower of cost or collateral value. Cash-basis loans are returned to an accrual status when all contractual principal and interest amounts are reasonably assured of repayment and there is a sustained period of repayment performance in accordance with the contractual terms.

Loans Held-for-Sale

        Corporate and consumer loans that have been identified for sale are classified as loans held-for-sale included inOther assets. With the exception of certain mortgage loans for which the fair-value option has been elected, these loans are accounted for at the lower of cost or market value, with any write-downs or subsequent recoveries charged toOther revenue.

Allowance for Loan Losses

        Allowance for loan losses represents management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio, as well as probable losses related to large individually evaluated impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes only, and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the overall portfolio. Additions to the allowance are made through the provision for credit losses. Credit losses are deducted from the allowance, and subsequent recoveries are added. Securities received in exchange for loan claims in debt restructurings are initially recorded at fair value, with any gain or loss reflected as a recovery or charge-off to the allowance,results and are subsequently accounted for as securities available-for-sale.

Corporate Loans

        Inclosely managed via credit controls that mitigate the corporate portfolios, larger-balance, non-homogeneous exposures representing significant individual credit exposures are evaluated based upon the borrower's overall financial condition, resources, the prospects for support from any financially responsible guarantors and, if appropriate, the realizable value of any collateral. Reserves are established for these loans based upon an estimate of probable losses for the individual loans deemed to be impaired. This estimate may consider the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's contractual effective rate, the secondary market value of the loan or the fair value of collateral less disposal costs. The allowance for credit losses attributed to the remaining portfolio is established via a process that estimates the probable lossadditional inherent in the portfolio based upon various analyses. These analyses consider historical default rates and loss severities, internal risk ratings, and geographic, industry, and other environmental factors.

        Management also considers overall portfolio indicators, including trends in internally risk-rated exposures, classified exposures, cash-basis loans, historical and forecasted write-offs, and a review of industry, geographic, and portfolio concentrations, including current developments within those segments. In addition, management considers the current business strategy and credit process, including credit limit setting and compliance, credit approvals, loan underwriting criteria, and loan workout procedures.

Consumer Loans

        ForConsumer loans, each portfolio of smaller-balance, homogeneous loans—including consumer mortgage, installment, revolving credit, and most other consumer loans—is independently evaluated for impairment. The allowance for loan losses attributed to these loans is established via a process that estimates the probable losses inherent in the specific portfolio based upon various analyses. These include migration analysis, in which historical delinquency and credit loss experience is applied to the current aging of the portfolio, together with analyses that reflect current trends and conditions.

        Management also considers overall portfolio indicators, including historical credit losses, delinquent, non-performing, and classified loans, trends in volumes and terms of loans, an evaluation of overall credit quality, the credit process, including lending policies and procedures, and economic, geographical, product and other environmental factors.

        In addition, valuation allowances are determined for impaired smaller-balance homogenous loans whose terms have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and where it has been determined that a concession will be granted to the borrower. Such modifications may include interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness and/or term extensions. These allowances are determined by comparing estimated cash flows of the loans discounted at the loans' original contractual interest rates to the carrying value of the loans.


Table of Contents

Reserve Estimates and Policies

        Management provides reserves for an estimate of probable losses inherent in the funded loan portfolio on the balance sheet in the form of an allowance for loan losses. These reserves are established in accordance with Citigroup's Credit Reserve Policies, as approved by the Audit and Risk Management Committee of the Company's Board of Directors. The Company's Chief Risk Officer and Chief Financial Officer review the adequacy of the credit loss reserves each quarter with representatives from the Risk Management and Finance staffs for each applicable business area.

        During these reviews, the above-mentioned representatives covering the business area having classifiably managed portfolios (that is, portfolios where internal credit-risk ratings are assigned, which are primarilyICG, Regional Consumer Banking andLocal Consumer Lending) and modified consumer loans where a concession was granted due to the borrowers' financial difficulties, and present recommended reserve balances for their funded and unfunded lending portfolios along with supporting quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data include:

        In addition, representatives from both the Risk Management and Finance staffs that cover business areas that have delinquency-managed portfolios containing smaller homogeneous loans (primarily the non-commercial lending areas ofConsumer Banking) present their recommended reserve balances based upon leading credit indicators, including loan delinquencies and changes in portfolio size as well as economic trends including housing prices, unemployment and GDP. This methodology is applied separately for each individual product within each different geographic region in which these portfolios exist.

        This evaluation process is subject to numerous estimates and judgments. The frequency of default, risk ratings, loss recovery rates, the size and diversity of individual large credits, and the ability of borrowers with foreign currency obligations to obtain the foreign currency necessary for orderly debt servicing, among other things, are all taken into account during this review. Changes in these estimates could have a direct impact on the credit costs in any quarter and could result in a change in the allowance. Changes to the reserve flow through the Consolidated Statement of Income on the linesProvision for loan losses andProvision for unfunded lending commitments.

Allowance for Unfunded Lending Commitments

        A similar approach to the allowance for loan losses is used for calculating a reserve for the expected losses related to unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit. This reserve is classified on the balance sheet inOther liabilities.risk.


Table of Contents


Details of Credit Loss Experience

In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009(1)
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

 $35,940 $31,703 $29,616 $24,005 $20,777 

Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period

 $46,197 $48,746 $36,033 $36,416 $35,940 
                       

Provision for loan losses

Provision for loan losses

 

Provision for loan losses

 
 

Consumer

 $7,321 $10,010 $8,010 $8,592 $7,831  

Consumer

 $5,345 $6,672 $8,244 $7,077 $7,321 
 

Corporate

 1,450 2,223 1,905 3,579 1,112  

Corporate

 321 (149) 122 764 1,450 
                       

 $8,771 $12,233 $9,915 $12,171 $8,943 

 $5,666 $6,523 $8,366 $7,841 $8,771 
                       

Gross credit losses

Gross credit losses

 

Gross credit losses

 

Consumer

Consumer

 

Consumer

 

In U.S. offices

 $4,459 $4,694 $4,124 $3,610 $3,073 

In U.S. offices

 $5,727 $6,379 $6,846 $4,360 $4,459 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 2,406 2,305 1,936 1,818 1,914 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 1,701 1,774 1,797 2,187 2,406 

Corporate

Corporate

 

Corporate

 

In U.S. offices

 1,101 1,216 1,176 364 156 

In U.S. offices

 806 563 404 478 1,101 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 483 558 424 756 200 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 265 290 155 877 483 
                       

 $8,449 $8,773 $7,660 $6,548 $5,343 

 $8,499 $9,006 $9,202 $7,902 $8,449 
                       

Credit recoveries

Credit recoveries

 

Credit recoveries

 

Consumer

Consumer

 

Consumer

 

In U.S. offices

 $149 $131 $136 $132 $137 

In U.S. offices

 $341 $345 $323 $160 $149 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 288 261 213 219 252 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 350 318 300 327 288 

Corporate

Corporate

 

Corporate

 

In U.S. offices

 30 4 1 2 3 

In U.S. offices

 78 307 177 246 30 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 13 22 28 52 31 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 71 74 18 34 13 
                       

 $480 $418 $378 $405 $423 

 $840 $1,044 $818 $767 $480 
                       

Net credit losses

Net credit losses

 

Net credit losses

 

In U.S. offices

 $5,381 $5,775 $5,163 $3,840 $3,089 

In U.S. offices

 $6,114 $6,290 $6,750 $4,432 $5,381 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 2,588 2,580 2,119 2,303 1,831 

In offices outside the U.S. 

 1,545 1,672 1,634 2,703 2,588 
                       

Total

Total

 $7,969 $8,355 $7,282 $6,143 $4,920 

Total

 $7,659 $7,962 $8,384 $7,135 $7,969 
                       

Other—net(6)(5)

Other—net(6)(5)

 $(326)$359 $(546)$(417)$(795)

Other—net(6)(5)

 $(530)$(1,110)$12,731 $(1,089)$(326)
                       

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(7)(6)

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(7)(6)

 $36,416 $35,940 $31,703 $29,616 $24,005 

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(7)(6)

 $43,674 $46,197 $48,746 $36,033 $36,416 
                       

Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans

Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans

 5.85% 5.60% 4.82% 4.27% 3.35%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of total loans

 6.73% 6.72% 6.80% 6.09% 5.85%

Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(8)(7)

Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(8)(7)

 $1,074 $1,082 $947 $887 $957 

Allowance for unfunded lending commitments(8)(7)

 $1,102 $1,054 $1,122 $1,157 $1,074 
                       

Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments

Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments

 $37,490 $37,022 $32,650 $30,503 $24,962 

Total allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending commitments

 $44,776 $47,251 $49,868 $37,190 $37,490 
                       

Net consumer credit losses

Net consumer credit losses

 $6,428 $6,607 $5,711 $5,077 $4,598 

Net consumer credit losses

 $6,737 $7,490 $8,020 $6,060 $6,428 

As a percentage of average consumer loans

As a percentage of average consumer loans

 5.66% 5.88% 4.95% 4.12% 3.57%

As a percentage of average consumer loans

 5.78% 5.75% 6.04% 5.43% 5.66%
                       

Net corporate credit losses

Net corporate credit losses

 $1,541 $1,748 $1,571 $1,066 $322 

Net corporate credit losses

 $922 $472 $364 $1,075 $1,541 

As a percentage of average corporate loans

As a percentage of average corporate loans

 0.82% 0.89% 0.79% 0.60% 0.15%

As a percentage of average corporate loans

 0.49% 0.25% 0.19% 0.61% 0.82%
                       

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(9)(8)

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(9)(8)

 

Allowance for loan losses at end of period(9)(8)

 

Citicorp

 $10,286 $10,046 $8,520 $7,684 $6,651 

Citicorp

 $17,371 $17,524 $18,503 $10,731 $10,956 

Citi Holdings

 26,130 25,894 23,183 21,932 17,354 

Citi Holdings

 26,303 28,673 30,243 25,302 25,460 
                       
 

Total Citigroup

 $36,416 $35,940 $31,703 $29,616 $24,005  

Total Citigroup

 $43,674 $46,197 $48,746 $36,033 $36,416 
                       

Allowance by type

Allowance by type

 

Consumer(9)

 $37,607 $39,578 $41,422 $28,397 $28,420 

Corporate

 6,067 6,619 7,324 7,636 7,996 
           
 

Total Citigroup

 $43,674 $46,197 $48,746 $36,033 $36,416 
           

(1)
Reclassified to conformThe third quarter of 2010 includes a reduction of approximately $54 million related to the current period's presentation.announced sale of The Student Loan Corporation (the allowance was transferred to assets held-for-sale). Additionally, the third quarter of 2010 includes a reduction of approximately $950 million related to the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of various U.S. loan portfolios.

(2)
The second quarter of 2010 includes a reduction of approximately $237 million related to the transfers to held-for-sale of the Canada cards portfolio and an auto portfolio. Additionally, second quarter of 2010 includes a reduction of approximately $480 million related to the sale or transfers to held-for-sale of U.S. real estate lending loans.

(3)
The first quarter of 2010 primarily includes $13.4 billion related to the impact of consolidating entities in connection with Citi's adoption of SFAS 166/167 (see discussion on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and reductions of approximately $640 million related to the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of U.S. and U.K. real estate lending loans.

(4)
The fourth quarter of 2009 includes a reduction of approximately $330 million related to securitizations and approximately $400 million related to the sale or transfer to held-for-sale of U.S. real estate lending loans.

(5)
The third quarter of 2009 primarily includes a reduction to the credit loss reserves of $562 million related to the transfer of the U.K. Cardscards portfolio to held-for-sale, partially offset by increases related to FX translation.

(3)
The second quarter of 2009 primarily includes increases to the credit loss reserves primarily related to FX translation.

(4)
The first quarter of 2009 primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of $213 million related to securitizations and reductions of approximately $320 million primarily related to FX translation.

(5)
The fourth quarter of 2008 primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of approximately $400 million primarily related to FX translation.

(6)
The third quarter of 2008 primarily includes reductions to the credit loss reserves of $23 million related to securitizations, reductions of $244 million related to the sale of Citigroup's German Retail Banking Operation and reductions of approximately $500 million related to FX translation.

(7)
Included in the allowance for loan losses are reserves for loans which have been modified subject to troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) of $4,587$7,090 million, $3,810$7,320 million, $2,760$6,926 million, $2,180$4,819 million, and $1,443$4,587 million as of September 30, 2009,2010, June 30, 2009,2010, March 31, 2009,2010, December 31, 2008,2009, and September 30, 2008,2009, respectively.

(8)(7)
Represents additional credit loss reserves for unfunded corporate lending commitments and letters of credit recorded inOther Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.


Table of Contents

(9)(8)
Allowance for loan losses represents management's best estimate of probable losses inherent in the portfolio, as well as probable losses related to large individually evaluated impaired loans and troubled debt restructurings.TDRs. Attribution of the allowance is made for analytical purposes only, and the entire allowance is available to absorb probable credit losses inherent in the overall portfolio.

(9)
Included in the third quarter of 2010 consumer loan loss reserve is $19.3 billion related to Citi's global credit card portfolio. See discussion on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Impaired Loans, Non-Accrual Loans and Assets, and Renegotiated Loans

        The following pages include information on Citi's "Impaired Loans," "Non-Accrual Loans and Assets" and "Renegotiated Loans." There is a certain amount of overlap between these categories. The following general summary provides a basic description of each category:

Impaired Loans:


Non-Accrual Loans and Assets:

Renegotiated Loans:

Impaired Loans

        Impaired loans are those where Citigroup believes it is probable that it will not collect all amounts due according to the original contractual terms of the loan. Impaired loans include corporate and Consumer (commercial market) non-accrual loans as well as smaller-balance homogeneous loans whose terms have been modified due to the borrower's financial difficulties and Citigroup has granted a concession to the borrower. Such modifications may include interest rate reductions and/or principal forgiveness.

        Valuation allowances for impaired loans are determined in accordance with ASC 310-10-35 and estimated considering all available evidence including, as appropriate, the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's original contractual effective rate, the secondary market value of the loan and the fair value of collateral less disposal costs.

        Consumer impaired loans exclude smaller-balance homogeneous loans that have not been modified and are carried on a non-accrual basis, as well as substantially all loans modified for periods of 12 months or less. As of September 30, 2010, loans included in those short-term programs amounted to approximately $6.8 billion. The allowance for loan losses for these loans is materially consistent with the requirements of ASC 310-10-35.

        The following table presents information about impaired loans:

In millions of dollars Sept. 30,
2010
 Dec. 31,
2009
 

Non-accrual corporate loans

       
 

Commercial and industrial

 $5,596 $6,347 
 

Loans to financial institutions

  750  1,794 
 

Mortgage and real estate

  2,138  4,051 
 

Lease financing

  57   
 

Other

  1,406  1,287 
      
 

Total non-accrual corporate loans

 $9,947 $13,479 
      

Impaired consumer loans(1)

       
 

Mortgage and real estate

 $16,339 $10,629 
 

Installment and other

  4,268  3,853 
 

Cards

  5,297  2,453 
      
 

Total impaired consumer loans

 $25,904 $16,935 
      

Total(2)

 $35,851 $30,414 
      

Non-accrual corporate loans with valuation allowances

 $6,383 $8,578 

Impaired consumer loans with valuation allowances

  25,430  16,453 
      

Non-accrual corporate valuation allowance

 $2,082 $2,480 

Impaired consumer valuation allowance

  7,234  4,977 
      

Total valuation allowances(3)

 $9,316 $7,457 
      

(1)
Prior to 2008, Citi's financial accounting systems did not separately track impaired smaller-balance, homogeneous consumer loans whose terms were modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and it was determined that a concession was granted to the borrower. Smaller-balance consumer loans modified since January 1, 2008 amounted to $25.1 billion and $15.9 billion at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. However, information derived from Citi's risk management systems indicates that the amounts of outstanding modified loans, including those modified prior to 2008, approximated $26.9 billion and $18.1 billion at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

(2)
Excludes loans purchased for investment purposes.

(3)
Included in theAllowance for loan losses.

Table of Contents


Non-Accrual Loans and Assets

        The table below summarizes the Company'sCitigroup's view of non-accrual loans as of the periods indicated. Non-accrual loans are loans in which the borrower has fallen behind in interest payments or, for corporate and Consumer (commercial market) loans, where the CompanyCiti has determined that the payment of interest or principal is doubtful, and which are therefore considered impaired. As discussed under "Accounting Policies" above, inIn situations where the CompanyCiti reasonably expects that only a portion of the principal and interest owed will ultimately be collected, all payments received are reflected as a reduction of principal and not as interest income. There is no industry-wide definition of non-accrual assets, however, and as such, analysis againstacross the industry is not always comparable.

        As discussed above under "Third Quarter of 2009 Management Summary," the Company has been actively moving corporate loans into the non-accrual category at earlier stages of anticipated distress.        Corporate non-accrual loans may still be current on interest payments however. Ofbut are considered non-accrual as Citi has determined that the total portfoliopayment of interest on principal is doubtful. Consistent with industry conventions, Citi generally accrues interest on credit card loans until such loans are charged-off, which typically occurs at 180 days contractual delinquency. As such, the non-accrual corporate loans as of September 30, 2009, over two-thirds are current and continue to make their contractual payments.loan disclosures in this section do not include credit card loans.

Non-accrual loans

In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 

Citicorp

Citicorp

 $5,131 $5,314 $3,829 $3,193 $2,408 

Citicorp

 $4,928 $4,510 $5,024 $5,353 $5,507 

Citi Holdings

Citi Holdings

 27,553 22,932 22,282 19,104 11,135 

Citi Holdings

 17,491 20,302 23,544 26,387 27,177 
                       

Total Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $32,684 $28,246 $26,111 $22,297 $13,543 

Total non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $22,419 $24,812 $28,568 $31,740 $32,684 
                       

Corporate non-accrual loans(1)

 

Corporate NAL(1)

Corporate NAL(1)

 

North America

North America

 $5,263 $3,499 $3,789 $2,660 $851 

North America

 $3,299 $4,411 $5,660 $5,621 $5,263 

EMEA

EMEA

 7,969 7,690 6,479 6,330 1,406 

EMEA

 5,473 5,508 5,834 6,308 7,969 

Latin America

Latin America

 416 230 300 229 125 

Latin America

 658 570 608 569 416 

Asia

Asia

 1,128 1,013 639 513 357 

Asia

 517 547 830 981 1,061 
                       

 $14,776 $12,432 $11,207 $9,732 $2,739 

 $9,947 $11,036 $12,932 $13,479 $14,709 
                       

Citicorp

 $2,999 $3,045 $1,825 $1,364 $605 

Citicorp

 $2,961 $2,573 $2,975 $3,238 $3,300 

Citi Holdings

 $11,777 $9,387 $9,382 $8,368 $2,134 

Citi Holdings

 6,986 8,463 9,957 10,241 11,409 
                       

 $14,776 $12,432 $11,207 $9,732 $2,739 

 $9,947 $11,036 $12,932 $13,479 $14,709 
                       

Consumer non-accrual loans(1)

 

North America(2)

 $14,609 $12,154 $11,687 $9,617 $7,941 

Consumer NAL(1)

Consumer NAL(1)

 

North America

North America

 $9,978 $11,289 $12,966 $15,111 $14,609 

EMEA

EMEA

 1,314 1,356 1,128 948 904 

EMEA

 758 690 790 1,159 1,314 

Latin America

Latin America

 1,342 1,520 1,338 1,290 1,343 

Latin America

 1,150 1,218 1,246 1,340 1,342 

Asia

Asia

 643 784 751 710 616 

Asia

 586 579 634 651 710 
                       

 $17,908 $15,814 $14,904 $12,565 $10,804 

 $12,472 $13,776 $15,636 $18,261 $17,975 
                       

Citicorp

 $2,132 $2,269 $2,004 $1,829 $1,803 

Citicorp

 $1,967 $1,937 $2,049 $2,115 $2,207 

Citi Holdings

 15,776 13,545 12,900 10,736 9,001 

Citi Holdings

 10,505 11,839 13,587 16,146 15,768 
                       

 $17,908 $15,814 $14,904 $12,565 $10,804 

 $12,472 $13,776 $15,636 $18,261 $17,975 
                       

(1)
Excludes purchased distressed loans as they are generally accreting interest.interest until write-off. The carrying value of these loans was $568 million at September 30, 2010, $672 million at June 30, 2010, $804 million at March 31, 2010, $920 million at December 31, 2009, and $1.267 billion at September 30, 2009, $1.509 billion at June 30, 2009, $1.328 billion at March 31, 2009, $1.510 billion at December 31, 2008, and $1.550 billion at September 30, 2008.

(2)
The recent increases reflect the impact of the deterioration in the U.S. consumer real estate market.2009.

Table of Contents

Non-Accrual Loans and Assets (Continued)(continued)

        The table below summarizes the Company'sCitigroup's other real estate owned (OREO) assets. This represents the carrying value of all real estate property acquired by foreclosure or other legal proceedings when the CompanyCiti has taken possession of the collateral.

Non-Accrual Assets

OREO 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 
OREO(in millions of dollars)OREO(in millions of dollars) 3rd Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 

Citicorp

Citicorp

 $284 $291 $307 $371 $425 

Citicorp

 $879 $866 $881 $874 $284 

Citi Holdings

Citi Holdings

 585 664 854 1,022 1,092 

Citi Holdings

 855 800 632 615 585 

Corporate/Other

Corporate/Other

 15 14 41 40 85 

Corporate/Other

 7 7 8 11 15 
                       

Total OREO

 $884 $969 $1,202 $1,433 $1,602 

Total OREO

 $1,741 $1,673 $1,521 $1,500 $884 
                       

North America

North America

 $682 $789 $1,115 $1,349 $1,525 

North America

 $1,470 $1,422 $1,291 $1,294 $682 

EMEA

EMEA

 105 97 65 66 61 

EMEA

 164 146 134 121 105 

Latin America

Latin America

 40 29 20 16 14 

Latin America

 53 49 51 45 40 

Asia

Asia

 57 54 2 2 2 

Asia

 54 56 45 40 57 
                       

 $884 $969 $1,202 $1,433 $1,602 

 $1,741 $1,673 $1,521 $1,500 $884 
                       

Other repossessed assets(1)

Other repossessed assets(1)

 $76 $72 $78 $78 $81 

Other repossessed assets(1)

 $38 $55 $64 $73 $76 
                       

(1)
Primarily transportation equipment, carried at lower of cost or fair value, less costs to sell.


Non-accrual assets—Total Citigroup 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 

Corporate non-accrual loans

 $14,776 $12,432 $11,207 $9,732 $2,739 

Consumer non-accrual loans

  17,908  15,814  14,904  12,565  10,804 
            
 

Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $32,684 $28,246 $26,111 $22,297 $13,543 
            

OREO

 $884 $969 $1,202 $1,433 $1,602 

Other repossessed assets

  76  72  78  78  81 
            
 

Non-accrual assets (NAA)

 $33,644 $29,287 $27,391 $23,808 $15,226 
            

NAL as a % of total loans

  5.25% 4.40% 3.97% 3.21% 1.89%

NAA as a % of total assets

  1.78% 1.59% 1.50% 1.23% 0.74%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL(1)

  111% 127% 121% 133% 177%
            
Non-accrual assets (NAA)—Total Citigroup 3rd Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 

Corporate NAL

 $9,947 $11,036 $12,932 $13,479 $14,709 

Consumer NAL

  12,472  13,776  15,636  18,261  17,975 
            
 

NAL

 $22,419 $24,812 $28,568 $31,740 $32,684 
            

OREO

 $1,741 $1,673 $1,521 $1,500 $884 

Other repossessed assets

  38  55  64  73  76 
            
 

NAA

 $24,198 $26,540 $30,153 $33,313 $33,644 
            

NAL as a percentage of total loans

  3.43% 3.58% 3.96% 5.37% 5.25%

NAA as a percentage of total assets

  1.22% 1.37% 1.51% 1.79% 1.78%

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1)

  195% 186% 171% 114% 111%
            


NAA—Total Citicorp 3rd Qtr.
2010
 2nd Qtr.
2010
 1st Qtr.
2010
 4th Qtr.
2009
 3rd Qtr.
2009
 

NAL

 $4,928 $4,510 $5,024 $5,353 $5,507 

OREO

  879  866  881  874  284 

Other repossessed assets

  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
            
 

Non-accrual assets (NAA)

 $5,807 $5,376 $5,905 $6,227 $5,791 
            

NAA as a percentage of total assets

  0.45% 0.44% 0.48% 0.55% 0.54%

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1)

  352% 389% 368% 200% 199%
            

NAA—Total Citi Holdings

                

NAL

 $17,491 $20,302 $23,544 $26,387 $27,177 

OREO

  855  800  632  615  585 

Other repossessed assets

  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
            
 

NAA

 $18,346 $21,102 $24,176 $27,002 $27,762 
            

NAA as a percentage of total assets

  4.36% 4.54% 4.81% 5.54% 4.99%

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of NAL(1)

  150% 141% 128% 96% 94%
            

(1)
The $6.403allowance for loan losses includes the allowance for credit card ($19.3 billion ofat September 30, 2010) and purchased distressed loans, while the non-accrual loans transferred from the held-for-sale portfolioexclude credit card balances and purchased distressed loans, as these generally continue to the held-for-investment portfolio during the fourth quarter of 2008 were marked to market at the transfer date and, therefore, no allowance was necessary at the time of the transfer. $2.426 billion of the par value of the loans reclassified was written off prior to transfer.accrue interest until write-off.

Non-accrual assets—Total Citicorp 3rd Qtr.
2009
 2nd Qtr.
2009
 1st Qtr.
2009
 4th Qtr.
2008
 3rd Qtr.
2008
 

Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $5,131 $5,314 $3,829 $3,193 $2,408 

OREO

  284  291  307  371  425 

Other repossessed assets

  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
            
 

Non-accrual assets (NAA)

 $5,415 $5,605 $4,136 $3,564 $2,833 
            

NAA as a % of total assets

  0.53% 0.57% 0.43% 0.36% 0.24%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL

  200% 189% 223% 241% 276%
            

Non-accrual assets—Total Citi Holdings

                

Non-accrual loans (NAL)

 $27,553 $22,932 $22,282 $19,104 $11,135 

OREO

  585  664  854  1,022  1,092 

Other repossessed assets

  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A 
            
 

Non-accrual assets (NAA)

 $28,138 $23,596 $23,136 $20,126 $12,227 
            

NAA as a % of total assets

  4.56% 3.64% 3.49% 2.81% 1.58%

Allowance for loan losses as a % of NAL

  95% 113% 104% 115% 156%
            

N/A
Not available at the Citicorp or Citi Holdings level.


Table of Contents


Consumer Loan Details

Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts, Net Credit Losses and Ratios
Table presents consumer credit information on a held basis.

 
 Total loans(1) 90 days or more past due(2)  
 Net credit losses(2) 
In millions of dollars, except total and average loan amounts in billions
 Sept.
2009
 Sept.
2009
 June
2009
 Sept.
2008
 Average loans(1)
3Q
2009
 3Q
2009
 2Q
2009
 3Q
2008
 

Citicorp

                         

Total

 $124.3 $1,909 $2,218 $1,634 $120.5 $1,426 $1,392 $1,096 
 

Ratio

     1.54% 1.89% 1.29%    4.70% 4.78% 3.35%

Retail Bank

                         
 

Total

  80.0  749  831  616  77.7  379  414  317 
  

Ratio

     0.94% 1.10% 0.77%    1.93% 2.22% 1.51%
 

North America

  7.5  93  97  54  7.4  79  86  35 
  

Ratio

     1.24% 1.35% 1.10%    4.23% 4.85% 3.03%
 

EMEA

  5.7  62  70  35  5.7  84  74  36 
  

Ratio

     1.09% 1.23% 0.48%    5.84% 5.34% 1.99%
 

Latin America

  17.7  324  360  323  16.9  113  140  147 
  

Ratio

     1.83% 2.18% 1.89%    2.65% 3.43% 3.29%
 

Asia

  49.1  270  304  204  47.7  103  114  99 
  

Ratio

     0.55% 0.66% 0.40%    0.85% 0.99% 0.73%

Citi-Branded Cards(3)

                         
 

Total

  44.3  1,160  1,387  1,018  42.8  1,047  978  779 
  

Ratio

     2.61% 3.29% 2.20%    9.71% 9.32% 6.58%
 

North America(4)

  12.4  241  248  118  11.3  201  219  109 
  

Ratio

     1.94% 2.21% 0.94%    7.06% 7.51% 3.67%
 

EMEA

  3.0  85  94  35  3.0  55  47  19 
  

Ratio

     2.83% 3.35% 1.12%    7.43% 6.70% 2.45%
 

Latin America

  11.9  519  695  603  11.9  543  472  493 
  

Ratio

     4.36% 5.89% 4.31%    18.05% 16.22% 13.16%
 

Asia

  17.0  315  350  262  16.6  248  240  158 
  

Ratio

     1.85% 2.15% 1.57%    5.93% 6.00% 3.63%

Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending

                         
 

Total

  310.8  18,538  16,486  11,294  319.6  4,929  5,156  3,487 
  

Ratio

     5.96% 5.10% 3.13%    6.12% 6.25% 3.83%
 

International

  37.3  1,447  1,535  1,033  39.5  973  976  737 
  

Ratio

     3.88% 3.81% 2.21%    9.77% 9.69% 6.02%
 

North America Retail Partners Cards(3)(4)

  21.7  885  917  810  23.7  867  872  646 
  

Ratio

     4.08% 4.06% 2.73%    14.51% 14.82% 8.80%
 

North America (excluding Cards)

  251.8  16,206  14,034  9,451  256.4  3,089  3,308  2,104 
  

Ratio

     6.44% 5.39% 3.33%    4.78% 4.98% 2.94%
                  

Total Citigroup (excluding Special Asset Pool)

 $435.1 $20,447 $18,704 $12,928 $440.1 $6,355 $6,548 $4,583 
  

Ratio

     4.70% 4.24% 2.66%    5.73% 5.87% 3.70%
                  

(1)
Total loans and average loans exclude interest and fees on credit cards.

(2)
The ratios of 90 days or more past due and net credit losses are calculated based on end-of-period loans and average loans, respectively, both net of unearned income.

(3)
The 90 days or more past due balance for Citi-branded cards and retail partners cards are generally still accruing interest. As discussed under "Loan Accounting Policies" above, the Company's policy is generally to accrue interest on credit card loans until 180 days past due, unless notification of bankruptcy filing has been received earlier.

(4)
In September 2009, the Citi-branded cards and retail partner cards businesses in North America changed their bankruptcy loss recognition practice from 10 days after receipt of notification of a cardmember's bankruptcy filing to 30 days after receipt of notification. The change was made to improve the accuracy in bankruptcy loss recognition and to closer align Citigroup's practices with industry norms. The effect of this change was not material.

Table of Contents


Consumer Loan Modification Programs
Renegotiated Loans

        The Company has institutedfollowing table presents loans which were modified in TDRs.

In millions of dollars Sept. 30,
2010
 Dec. 31,
2009
 

Corporate renegotiated loans(1)

       

In U.S. offices

       
 

Commercial and industrial(2)

 $284 $203 
 

Mortgage and real estate(3)

  35   
 

Other

  241   
      

 $560 $203 
      

In offices outside the U.S.

       
 

Commercial and industrial(2)

 $218 $145 
 

Mortgage and real estate(3)

  2  2 
 

Other

  11   
      

 $231 $147 
      

Total corporate renegotiated loans

 $791 $350 
      

Consumer renegotiated loans(4)(5)(6)(7)

       

In U.S. offices

       
 

Mortgage and real estate

 $16,611 $11,165 
 

Cards

  4,288  992 
 

Installment and other

  1,972  2,689 
      

 $22,871 $14,846 
      

In offices outside the U.S.

       
 

Mortgage and real estate

 $749 $415 
 

Cards

  1,009  1,461 
 

Installment and other

  2,368  1,401 
      

 $4,126  3,277 
      

Total consumer renegotiated loans

 $26,997 $18,123 
      

(1)
Includes $500 million and $317 million of non-accrual loans included in the non-accrual assets table above, at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The remaining loans are accruing interest.

(2)
In addition to modifications reflected as TDRs, at September 30,2010, Citi also modified $348 million and $513 million of commercial loans risk rated "Substandard Non-Performing" or worse (asset category defined by banking regulators) in U.S. offices and in offices outside the U.S., respectively. These modifications were not considered TDRs because the modifications did not involve a varietyconcession (a required element of a TDR for accounting purposes).

(3)
In addition to modifications reflected as TDRs, at September 30, 2010, Citi also modified $1,333 million and $142 million of commercial real estate loans risk rated "Substandard Non-Performing" or worse (asset category defined by banking regulators) in U.S. offices and in offices outside the U.S., respectively. These modifications were not considered TDRs because the modifications did not involve a concession (a required element of a TDR for accounting purposes).

(4)
Includes $2,441 million and $2,000 million of non-accrual loans included in the non-accrual assets table above at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The remaining loans are accruing interest.

(5)
Includes $8 million of commercial real estate loans at September 30, 2010.

(6)
Includes $131 million and $16 million of commercial loans at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

(7)
Smaller-balance homogeneous loans were derived from Citi's risk management systems.

        In certain circumstances, Citigroup modifies certain of its corporate loans involving a non-troubled borrower. These modifications are subject to Citi's normal underwriting standards for new loans and are made in the normal course of business to match customers' needs with available Citi products or programs to assist(these modifications are not included in the table above). In other cases, loan modifications involve a troubled borrower that Citi may grant a concession (modification). Modifications involving troubled borrowers with financial difficulties. These programsmay include modifyingextension of maturity date, reduction in the original loan terms, reducingstated interest rates, extendingrate, rescheduling of future cash flows, reduction in the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portionface amount of the remaining principal balance. The Company's programs consistdebt, or reduction of the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), as well as short-term forbearance and long-term modification programs, summarized below. The short and long-term programs are available to credit card, residential mortgage, personal installment, and auto borrowers both internationally and in the U.S.

        HAMP.    As of September 30, 2009, $5.7 billion of first mortgages, have been enrolled in HAMP, pending successful completion ofpast accrued interest. In cases where Citi grants a trial period (described below). The HAMP is designed to reduce monthly mortgage paymentsconcession to a 31% housing debt ratio by loweringtroubled borrower, Citi accounts for the interest rate, extending the term of the loan and forbearing principal of certain eligible borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgages or who are at risk of imminent default due to economic hardship. In order to be entitled to loan modifications, borrowers must completemodification as a three- to five-month trial period, make the agreed payments and provide the required documentation before the end of the trial period. During the trial period, the original terms of the loans remain in effect pending final modification.

        Short-Term Programs.    Citigroup has also instituted programs to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships. These programs include short-term (twelve months or less) interest rate reductions and deferrals of past due payments. The loan volumeTDR under these short-term programs has increased significantly during 2009. As of September 30, 2009, short-term interest rate reduction programs covered loans in the residential mortgage ($7.4 billion), personal installment ($0.9 billion), credit card ($0.9 billion) and auto ($0.5 billion) businesses. Payment deferrals primarily occur in the U.S. residential mortgage business. Appropriate loan loss reserves have been established, giving consideration to the higher risk associated with those borrowers.

        Long-Term Programs.    Long-term modification programs, or "Troubled Debt Restructurings" (TDRs), occur when the terms of a loan have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and a long-term concession has been granted to the borrower. TDRs totaled $13.6 billion as of September 30, 2009. TDRs can be applied to credit card, residential mortgage, personal installment and auto loans. Valuation allowances for TDRs are determined by comparing estimated cash flows of the loans discounted at the loans' original contractual interest rates to the carrying value of the loans.ASC 310-40.


Table of Contents


U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending

Overview

        The Company's U.S.        Citi's North America consumer mortgage portfolio consists of both first lien and second lien mortgages, managed primarily by Local Consumer Lending (LCL) within Citi Holdings. However, $0.5 billion of first lien mortgages and $1.7 billion of second lien mortgages are reported in Citicorp.mortgages. As of September 30, 2009,2010, the U.S. first lien mortgage portfolio totaled approximately $122$104 billion while the U.S. second lien mortgage portfolio was approximately $53$50 billion.

        Data appearing throughout this report, including in Although the tables below, have been sourced frommajority of the Company's risk systems and, as such, may not reconcile with Citi's disclosures elsewhere generally due to differences in methodology and/or inconsistencies or variations in the manner in which information is captured. In addition, while the Company's risk management function continually reviews and refines its data capture and processing systems, certain Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and loan-to-value (LTV) data on the Company's mortgage portfolio is not available. The Company has noted such variations or inabilities to capture data, as applicable, below where material.reported inLCL within Citi Holdings, there are $18 billion of first mortgages and $4 billion of second mortgages reported in Citicorp.

        It is generally the Company's credit risk policy not to offer option ARMs/negative amortizing mortgage products to its customers. Option ARMs/negative amortizing mortgages represent a very insignificant portion of total balances that were acquired only incidentally as part of prior portfolio and business purchases.

        A portion of loans in the Company's U.S. mortgage portfolio currently requires a payment to satisfy only the current accrued interest for the payment period or an interest-only payment. The Company'sCiti's first mortgage portfolio includes approximately $30 billion of first and second lien home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) with the interest-only payment feature that are still within their revolving period and have not commenced amortization. The interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for the HELOC product across the industry. The first mortgage portfolio also contains approximately $35 billion of mostly adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) that are currently required to make an interest-only payment. These loans will be required to make a fully amortizing payment upon expiration of their interest-only payment period, and most will do so within a few years of origination. Borrowers that are currently required to make an interest only payment cannot select a lower payment that will negatively amortize the loan. First mortgage loans with the interest-only payment feature are primarily to high credit quality borrowers that have on average significantly higher refreshed FICO scores than other loans in the first mortgage portfolio.

Loan Balances

        First Mortgages—Loan Balances.    Approximately 83% of the Company's first lien mortgage portfolio had FICO credit scores of at least 620 at origination. As a consequence of the difficult economic environment and the decrease in housing prices, LTV ratios and FICO scores have deteriorated since originations, as depicted in the tables below. On a refreshed basis, approximately 31% of first lien mortgages had a FICO score below 620, compared to approximately 17% at origination.

Balances: September 30, 2009—First Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

  57% 5% 6%

80% < LTV < 90%

  3% 2% 4%

LTV³ 90%

  10% 6% 7%


Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO£620 

LTV£ 80%

  29% 4% 11%

80% < LTV < 90%

  8% 1% 4%

LTV³ 90%

  23% 4% 16%

Note: First lien mortgage table excludes loans in Canada, Puerto Rico and loans sold with recourse. Balances exclude deferred fees/costs. Refreshed FICO scores based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Case-Shiller Home Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index. Tables exclude $3.1 billion from At Origination balances and $2.6 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. The 90 or more days past due (90+DPD) delinquency rate for mortgages with unavailable FICO or LTV is 13.9% At Origination and 10.2% from Refreshed vs. 10.2% for total portfolio. Excluding government-insured loans, loans subject to long-term standby commitments and PMI loans described below, the 90+DPD delinquency rate for the first lien mortgage portfolio as of September 30, 2009 is 9.0%.

        The Company's first lien mortgage portfolio includes $4.8$9.9 billion of loans with Federal Housing AdministrationFHA or Veterans AdministrationVA guarantees. These portfolios consist of loans originated to low-to-moderate-income borrowers with lower FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) scores and generally have higher LTVs. Theseloan-to-value ratios (LTVs). Losses on FHA loans are borne by the sponsoring agency, provided that the insurance has not been breached as a result of an origination defect. The VA establishes a loan-level loss cap, beyond which Citi is liable for loss. FHA and VA loans have high delinquency rates (approximately 37% 90+DPD) but, given the guarantees, the CompanyCiti has experienced negligible credit losses on these loans. The first lien mortgage portfolio also includes $2.4$1.8 billion of loans with LTVs above 80%, which have insurance through private mortgage insurance (PMI) companies, and $4.2$1.8 billion of loans subject to Long-Term Standby Commitments(1)long-term standby commitments(1) (LTSC) with Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSE)U.S. government sponsored entities (GSEs), for which the CompanyCiti has limited exposure to credit losses. Citi's second mortgage portfolio also includes $0.6 billion of loans subject to LTSCs with GSEs, for which Citi has limited exposure to credit losses. Citi's allowance for loan loss calculations take into consideration the impact of these guarantees.

        Citi continually reviews its foreclosure processes with respect to its U.S. mortgage portfolios. As a result of increased attention to the foreclosure process on an industry-wide basis, Citi has intensified the review of its foreclosure processes, and numerous governmental entities have commenced proceedings or otherwise sought information in this area (see "Legal Proceedings" below). To date, Citi has not identified systemic deficiencies in its existing foreclosure processes. However, Citi's review of its existing and historical processes continues and, depending on the results of that review, or if any industry-wide adverse regulatory or judicial actions are taken in respect of foreclosures, Citi's ability to continue to carry out its current foreclosure processes, and its financial results of operations and financial condition, could be adversely affected.

Consumer Mortgage Quarterly Trends—Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses

        The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for Citi's first and second consumer mortgage portfolios in North America.

        Delinquencies and net credit losses in the first mortgage portfolio continued to be impacted by the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) trial loans and the growing backlog of foreclosures in process. Loans in the HAMP trial modification period that do not make their original contractual payments are reported as delinquent, even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower. Upon conclusion of the trial period, loans that are not modified permanently are returned to the delinquency status in which they began their trial period, adjusted for the number of payments received during the trial period. If the loans are modified permanently, they will be returned to current status. For additional information on HAMP, see "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" below.

        In addition, as previously disclosed, the growing amount of foreclosures in process, which continues to be related to an industry-wide phenomenon resulting from foreclosure moratoria and other efforts to prevent or forestall foreclosure, have specific implications for the portfolio:

        As set forth in the charts below, net credit losses and 90 days or more delinquencies in both first and second mortgages continued to improve during the third quarter of 2010. For first mortgages, the sequential improvement in 90 days or more delinquencies, as well as net credit losses, was driven predominantly by asset sales and HAMP trial modifications converting into permanent modifications, offset by the continued backlog in foreclosures in process. During the third quarter of 2010, Citi sold $1 billion in delinquent mortgages. In addition, as of September 30, 2010, Citi had converted a total of approximately $4.1 billion of HAMP trial modifications to permanent modifications.

        For second mortgages, the net credit loss and 90 days or more delinquency improvement was driven by modification programs and, to a lesser extent, overall portfolio dynamics. Citi does not currently sell second mortgages.


(1)
A Long-Term Standby Commitment (LTSC)LTSC is a structured transaction in which the CompanyCiti transfers the credit risk of certain eligible loans to an investor in exchange for a fee. These loans remain on balance sheet unless they reach a certain delinquency level (between 120 and 180 days), in which case the LTSC investor is required to buy the loan at par.

Table of Contents

GRAPHIC

Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans 90 days or more past due exclude loans recorded at fair value since 1Q'10 and U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored agencies because the potential loss predominately resides with the U.S. agencies.

GRAPHIC

Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans 90 days or more past due exclude loans recorded at fair value since 1Q'10 and U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government-sponsored agencies because the potential loss predominately resides with the U.S. agencies.


Table of Contents

Consumer Mortgage FICO and LTV

        Data appearing in the tables below have been sourced from Citigroup's risk systems and, as such, may not reconcile with disclosures elsewhere generally due to differences in methodology or variations in the manner in which information is captured. Citi has noted such variations in instances where it believes they could be material to reconcile the information presented elsewhere.

        Citi's credit risk policy is not to offer option adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs)/negative amortizing mortgage products to its customers. As a result, option ARMs/negative amortizing mortgages represent an insignificant portion of total balances since they were acquired only incidentally as part of prior portfolio and business purchases.

        A portion of loans in the U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio currently requires a payment to satisfy only the current accrued interest for the payment period, or an interest-only payment. Citi's mortgage portfolio includes approximately $28 billion of first- and second- mortgage home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) that are still within their revolving period and have not commenced amortization. The interest-only payment feature during the revolving period is standard for the HELOC product across the industry. The first mortgage portfolio contains approximately $26 billion of ARMs that are currently required to make an interest-only payment. These loans will be required to make a fully amortizing payment upon expiration of their interest-only payment period, and most will do so within a few years of origination. Borrowers that are currently required to make an interest-only payment cannot select a lower payment that would negatively amortize the loan. First mortgage loans with this payment feature are primarily to high credit quality borrowers that have on average significantly higher origination and refreshed FICO scores than other loans in the first mortgage portfolio.

Loan Balances

        SecondFirst Mortgages—Loan Balances.    InAs a consequence of the second lien mortgage portfolio,economic environment and the majority of loans aredecrease in housing prices, LTV and FICO scores have generally deteriorated since origination, as depicted in the higher FICO categories. However,table below, although they have generally stabilized since the challenging economic conditions have createdquarter ended June 30, 2010. On a migration towards lowerrefreshed basis, approximately 29% of first mortgages had a LTV ratio above 100%, compared to approximately 0% at origination. Approximately 29% of the first mortgages had FICO scores and higher LTV ratios. Approximately 61% of that portfolio hadless than 620 on a refreshed LTV ratios of 90% or more,basis, compared to about 36%16% at origination. However, many of the loans in the portfolio are HELOC's, where the LTV ratio is calculated as if the line were fully drawn. As a majority of lines are only partially drawn, current LTVs on a drawn basis will be lower.

Balances: September 30, 2009—Second Lien2010—First Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620  FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

 48% 2% 2% 58% 6% 7%

80% < LTV < 90%

 10% 1% 1%

LTV³ 90%

 33% 2% 1%

80% < LTV £ 100%

 13% 7% 9%

LTV > 100%

 NM NM NM 

 

Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

  22% 2% 3%

80% < LTV < 90%

  9% 1% 2%

LTV³ 90%

  44% 5% 12%
Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV £ 80%

  27% 4% 9%

80% < LTV £ 100%

  18% 4% 9%

LTV > 100%

  15% 3% 11%

Note: Second lienNM—Not meaningful. First mortgage table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico. Table excludes loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs. Table also excludes $1.6 billion from At Origination balances and $0.4 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. Balances exclude deferred fees/costs. Refreshed FICO scores based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Case-Shiller HomeLoan Performance Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index. Tables exclude $1.8

        Second Mortgages—Loan Balances.    In the second mortgage portfolio, the majority of loans are in the higher FICO categories. Economic conditions have generally caused a migration towards lower FICO scores and higher LTV ratios, although the negative migration has slowed since the quarter ended June 30, 2010. Approximately 46% of second mortgages had refreshed LTVs above 100%, compared to approximately 0% at origination. Approximately 17% of second mortgages had FICO scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis, compared to 3% at origination.

Balances: September 30, 2010—Second Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV £ 80%

  50% 2% 2%

80% < LTV £ 100%

  42% 3% 1%

LTV > 100%

  NM  NM  NM 


Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV £ 80%

  23% 1% 3%

80% < LTV £ 100%

  21% 2% 4%

LTV > 100%

  31% 5% 10%

Note: N.M.—Not meaningful. Second mortgage table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico. Table excludes loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs. Table also excludes $1.5 billion from At Origination balances and $1.6$0.4 billion from Refreshed balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable. AsRefreshed FICO scores are based on updated credit scores obtained from Fair Isaac Corporation. Refreshed LTV ratios are derived from data at origination updated using mainly the Loan Performance Price Index or the Federal Housing Finance Agency Price Index.


Table of September 30, 2009, the 90+ DPD delinquency rate for mortgages with unavailable FICO or LTV is 3.8% At Origination and 7.1% from Refreshed vs. 3.1% for total portfolio.

        The second lien mortgage portfolio includes $1.8 billion of loans subject to LTSC with one of the GSE, hence limiting the Company's exposure to credit losses.Contents

Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses

        The tables below provide delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD,90 or more days past due (90+DPD) as a percentage of outstandings in each of the FICO/LTV combinations, in both the first lien and second lien mortgage portfolios. For example, loans with FICO³ 660 and LTV£ 80% at origination have a 90+DPD rate of 6.6%5.1%.

        As evidenced by the tables below, loans with FICO scores of less than 620 exhibit significantly higher delinquencies than in any other FICO band. Similarly, loans with LTVs equal to or greater than 90%100% have higher delinquencies than LTVs of less than 90%or equal to 100%.

        In addition,While the dollar balances of 90+DPD loans have declined for both first mortgage delinquencies continued to rise duringand second mortgages, the third quarter. Further breakout of the FICO below 620 segment indicates that delinquenciesdelinquency rates have declined for first mortgages, and increased for second mortgages, from those reflected in this segment, on a refreshed basis, are about three times higher than in the overall first mortgage portfolio.statistics at June 30, 2010.

Delinquencies: 90+DPD Rates—First Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

  6.6% 11.3% 13.5%

80%> < LTV < 90%

  7.9% 14.3% 17.8%

LTV³ 90%

  10.1% 17.6% 24.7%
At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV £ 80%

  5.1% 10.3% 11.7%

80% < LTV £ 100%

  7.7% 12.9% 16.3%

LTV > 100%

  NM  NM  NM 

 

Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620  FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

 0.2% 3.4% 17.8% 0.2% 3.5% 14.9%

80%£ LTV < 90%

 0.5% 5.9% 24.7%

LTV³ 90%

 1.7% 13.7% 36.3%

80% < LTV £ 100%

 0.7% 7.4% 21.4%

LTV > 100%

 1.8% 13.5% 27.6%

Note: NM—Not meaningful. 90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the tables above.

Delinquencies: 90+DPD Rates—Second Lien Mortgages

At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

  1.5% 4.0% 5.1%

80% < LTV < 90%

  3.3% 5.0% 5.8%

LTV³ 90%

  4.7% 5.6% 7.6%
At Origination
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV £ 80%

  1.7% 4.2% 5.9%

80% < LTV £ 100%

  3.5% 5.4% 7.5%

LTV > 100%

  NM  NM  NM 

 

Refreshed
 FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620  FICO³660 620£FICO<660 FICO<620 

LTV£ 80%

 0.0% 0.9% 8.3% 0.0% 1.5% 8.7%

80% < LTV < 90%

 0.0% 0.7% 8.5%

LTV³ 90%

 0.3% 3.6% 18.1%

80% < LTV £ 100%

 0.1% 2.0% 10.7%

LTV > 100%

 0.3% 3.3% 16.1%

Note: NM—Not meaningful. 90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the tables above.

        The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for the Company's first and second N.A. consumer mortgage portfolios.

        Both losses and delinquencies for the first mortgage portfolio have been impacted by the HAMP. As set forth in the first chart, first mortgage delinquencies continued to increase in the third quarter of 2009, exacerbated in part by the reduction in loan balances. However, the continued increase in first mortgage delinquencies during the third quarter 2009 is largely explained by the impact of HAMP. As mentioned elsewhere in this report, loans in the HAMP trial modification period are reported as delinquent if the original contractual payments are not received on time (even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower).

        Further, HAMP impacted Citi's net credit losses in the first mortgage portfolio during the third quarter of 2009 as


Table of Contents

loans in the trial period are not charged off at 180 DPD as long as they have made at least one payment. Nearly half of the sequential decline in net credit losses on first mortgages during the third quarter 2009 was attributable to HAMP. The Company has increased its loan loss provisions to offset this impact.

        Based on these trends described above, the Company believes that the success rate of HAMP will be a key factor influencing net credit losses from delinquent first mortgage loans in the near future, and the outcome of the program will largely depend on the success rates of borrowers completing the trial period and meeting the documentation requirements.

        By contrast, during the third quarter of 2009, second mortgage delinquencies began to moderate, as did net credit losses, as compared to the prior quarter. The Company continues to actively manage this exposure by reducing the riskiest accounts, including by tightening credit requirements through higher FICOs, lower LTVs, increased documentation and verifications.

        It should be noted that first mortgage net credit losses, as a percentage of average loans, are nearly half the level of those in the second mortgage portfolio, despite much higher delinquencies in the first mortgage portfolio. The Company believes that two major factors explain this relationship:

    first mortgages have a senior secured position;

    more first mortgages undergo a foreclosure process where they will continue to be counted as delinquent until the conclusion of the process.

    Table of Contents

    GRAPHIC

    Note: Includes loans for Canada, Puerto Rico and loans held for sale. Balances include deferred fees/costs.

    GRAPHIC

    Note: Includes loans for Canada and Puerto Rico.

    Origination Channel, Geographic Distribution and Origination Vintage

            The following tables detail the Company'sCiti's first and second U.S. Consumer mortgage portfolios by origination channels, geographic distribution and origination vintage.

    By Origination Channel

            The Company'sCiti's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio has been originated from three main channels: retail, broker and correspondent.

      Retail: loans originated through a direct relationship with the borrower.

      Broker: loans originated through a mortgage broker, where the CompanyCiti underwrites the loan directly with the borrower.

      Correspondent: loans originated and funded by a third party, where the CompanyCiti purchases the closed loans after the correspondent has funded the loan. This channel includes loans acquired in large bulk purchases from other mortgage originators primarily in 2006 and 2007. Such bulk purchases were discontinued in 2007.

    Table of Contents

    First Lien Mortgages: September 30, 20092010

            As of September 30, 2010, approximately 53% of the first mortgage portfolio was originated through third-party channels. Given that loans originated through correspondents have exhibited higher 90+DPD delinquency rates than retail originated mortgages, Citi terminated business with a number of correspondent sellers in 2007 and 2008. During 2008, Citi also severed relationships with a number of brokers, only maintaining those who have produced strong, high-quality and profitable volume. 90+DPD delinquency amounts, amount of loans with FICO scores of less than 620, and amount of loans with LTV over 100% have generally improved since June 30, 2010.

    CHANNEL
    ($ in billions)
     First Lien
    Mortgages
     Channel
    % Total
     90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90  First Lien
    Mortgages
     Channel
    % Total
     90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV > 100% 

    Retail

     $50.5 41.5% 4.4%$14.6 $16.4  $43.2 47.0% 5.2%$13.2 $9.1 

    Broker

     $21.0 17.3% 10.5%$4.2 $10.0  $15.9 17.2% 7.2%$2.9 $5.0 

    Correspondent

     $50.2 41.2% 15.9%$18.6 $26.0  $32.9 35.8% 11.1%$10.8 $12.7 

    *
    Refreshed FICO and LTV.

    Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs, loans recorded at fair value, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies and loans sold with recourse.subject to LTSCs.

            As of September 30, 2009, approximately 41% of the first lien mortgage portfolio was originated through the correspondent channel, a reduction from approximately 43% as of the end of 2008. Given that loans originated through correspondents have exhibited higher 90+DPD delinquency rates than retail originated mortgages, the Company terminated business with a number of correspondent sellers in 2007 and 2008. During 2008, the Company severed relationships with a number of brokers, only maintaining those who have produced strong, high-quality and profitable volume.

    Second Lien Mortgages: September 30, 20092010

    CHANNEL
    ($ in billions)
     Second Lien
    Mortgages
     Channel
    % Total
     90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90 

    Retail

     $27.0  50.8% 1.6%$3.9 $12.4 

    Broker

     $13.2  24.9% 4.0%$2.2 $9.9 

    Correspondent

     $12.9  24.3% 5.2%$3.1 $9.5 

    *
    Refreshed FICO and LTV.

    Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico.

            For second lien mortgages, approximately 49%47% of the loans were originated through third-party channels. As these mortgages have demonstrated a higher incidence of delinquencies, the CompanyCiti no longer originates second mortgages through third-party channels, which represented approximately 54%channels. 90+DPD delinquency amounts, amount of the portfolio asloans with FICO scores of the endless than 620, and amount of 2008.loans with LTV over 100% have generally slightly improved since June 30, 2010.


    Table of Contents

    CHANNEL
    ($ in billions)
     Second Lien
    Mortgages
     Channel
    % Total
     90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV > 100% 

    Retail

     $23.3  53.0% 1.9%$3.7 $6.6 

    Broker

     $10.8  24.6% 3.7%$1.8 $6.3 

    Correspondent

     $9.8  22.4% 3.8%$2.3 $7.1 

    *
    Refreshed FICO and LTV.

    Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs.

    By State

            Approximately half of the Company'sCiti's U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio is located in five states: California, New York, Florida, TexasIllinois and Illinois. ThoseTexas. These states represent 49%50% of first lien mortgages and 54%55% of second lien mortgages.

            With respect to first mortgages, Florida and Illinois havehad above average 90+DPD delinquency rates.rates as of September 30, 2010. Florida has 39%55% of its first mortgage lien portfolio in the FICO<620 band; and 66% of its loan portfolio haswith refreshed LTV³90.LTV>100%, compared to 29% overall for first mortgages. Illinois has 33% of its loans in the FICO<620 band; and 54% of its loan portfolio has LTV³90.with refreshed LTV>100%. Texas, despite having 44%40% of its portfolio with FICO<620, has a lower delinquency rate relative to the overall portfolio. Texas has only 8%6% of its loan portfolio with refreshed LTV³90.LTV>100%.

    First Lien Mortgages: September 30, 2009

    STATES
    ($ in billions)
     First Lien
    Mortgages
     State
    % Total
     90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90 

    California

     $32.3  26.6% 9.0%$5.2 $18.3 

    New York

     $10.0  8.2% 6.8%$2.0 $1.7 

    Florida

     $7.3  6.0% 16.8%$2.8 $4.8 

    Texas

     $5.3  4.3% 8.7%$2.3 $0.4 

    Illinois

     $5.2  4.3% 11.4%$1.7 $2.8 

    Others

     $61.7  50.7% 10.6%$23.4 $24.3 

    *
    Refreshed FICO and LTV.

    Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs and loans sold with recourse.

            In the second lien mortgage portfolio, Florida continuescontinued to experience above-average delinquencies at 4.5% as of September 30, 2010, with approximately 81%71% of theirits loans with refreshed LTV³ 90 > 100%, compared to 60%46% overall for second lien mortgages.

    Second Lien Mortgages: September 30, 2009

    STATES
    ($ in billions)
     Second Lien
    Mortgages
     State
    % Total
     90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90 

    California

     $14.6  27.4% 3.8%$2.0 $10.4 

    New York

     $6.9  12.9% 1.9%$0.8 $2.2 

    Florida

     $3.6  6.8% 5.2%$0.8 $2.9 

    Illinois

     $2.1  3.9% 3.0%$0.4 $1.5 

    Texas

     $1.5  2.8% 1.2%$0.2 $0.2 

    Others

     $24.5  46.1% 2.8%$5.0 $14.5 

    *
    Refreshed FICO and LTV.

    Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico.


    Table of Contents

    By Vintage

            For the Company'sCitigroup's combined U.S. consumer mortgage portfolio (first and second lien mortgages), as of September 30, 2010, approximately half of the portfolio consistsconsisted of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which demonstrate above average delinquencies. In first mortgages, approximately 43%42% of the portfolio is of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which havehad 90+DPD rates well above the overall portfolio rate.rate, at 9.8% for 2006 and 11.0% for 2007. In second mortgages, 64%61% of the portfolio is of 2006 and 2007 vintages, which again havehad higher delinquencies compared to the overall portfolio rate.rate, at 3.4% for 2006 and 3.2% for 2007.


    Table of Contents

    First Lien Mortgages: September 30, 2009FICO and LTV Trend Information—U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending

    VINTAGES
    ($ in billions)
     First Lien
    Mortgages
     Vintage
    % Total
     90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90 

    2009

     $4.1  3.3% 0.3%$0.6 $0.9 

    2008

     $15.1  12.4% 5.2%$3.3 $5.5 

    2007

     $30.0  24.6% 15.8%$11.5 $18.7 

    2006

     $22.2  18.2% 13.7%$7.6 $13.3 

    2005

     $20.8  17.1% 7.5%$5.0 $9.6 

    £ 2004

     $29.5  24.3% 7.7%$9.5 $4.5 

    *
    Refreshed FICO and LTV.

    Note: First lien mortgage table excludes Canada and Puerto Rico, deferred fees/costs and loans sold with recourse.

    1st Mortgage ($B)2nd Mortgage ($B)

    GRAPHIC


    GRAPHIC

    GRAPHIC


    GRAPHIC

    Note: First mortgage chart/table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico, loans guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs. Balances exclude deferred fees/costs. Balances based on refreshed FICO and LTV ratios. Chart/table also excludes balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable ($1.0 billion in 4Q09, $0.6 billion in 1Q10, $0.4 billion in 2Q10 and $0.4 billion in 3Q10).


    Note: Second mortgage chart/table excludes loans in Canada and Puerto Rico, loans recorded at fair value and loans subject to LTSCs. Balances based on refreshed FICO and LTV ratios. Chart/table also excludes balances for which FICO or LTV data was unavailable ($0.8 billion in 4Q09, $0.4 billion in 1Q10, $0.4 billion in 2Q10 and $0.4 billion in 3Q10).

    Second Lien Mortgages:        As of September 30, 2010, the first mortgage portfolio was approximately $92 billion, a reduction of $15 billion or 14% from December 2009. First mortgage loans with refreshed FICO score below 660 and refreshed LTV above 100% were $13.2 billion as of September 30, 2010, $1.7 billion or 11% lower than the balance as of December 2009. Similarly, the second mortgage portfolio was approximately $44 billion as of September 30, 2010, a reduction of $5 billion or 11% from December 2009. Second mortgage loans with refreshed FICO score below 660 and refreshed LTV above 100% were $6.4 billion as of September 30, 2010, $0.3 billion or 4% lower than the balance as of December 2009. Across both portfolios, 90+ DPD rates have generally improved since December 31, 2009 across each of the FICO/LTV segments outlined above, particularly those segments with refreshed FICO scores below 660.


    VINTAGES
    ($ in billions)
     Second Lien
    Mortgages
     Vintage
    % Total
     90+DPD % *FICO < 620 *LTV³ 90 

    2009

     $0.5  0.9% 0.6%$0.0 $0.0 

    2008

     $4.4  8.3% 0.9%$0.5 $1.5 

    2007

     $16.0  30.0% 3.5%$3.0 $10.4 

    2006

     $17.8  33.6% 3.8%$3.4 $12.9 

    2005

     $10.1  18.9% 2.7%$1.5 $6.2 

    £ 2004

     $4.4  8.3% 1.7%$0.7 $0.9 

    *
    Refreshed FICO and LTV.

    Note: Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico.

    Table of Contents

    N.A. Cards
    Interest Rate Risk Associated with Consumer Mortgage Lending Activity

            Citigroup originates and funds mortgage loans. As with all other lending activity, this exposes Citigroup to several risks, including credit, liquidity and interest rate risks. For on-balance sheet exposures, these risks are measured and monitored as described in the Credit Risk, Liquidity and Funding, and Interest Rate Exposure sections. To minimize credit and liquidity risk, Citigroup sells most of the mortgage loans it originates, but retains the servicing rights. These sale transactions create an intangible asset referred to as MSRs. The Company's N.A.fair value of this asset is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. The fair value of MSRs declines with increased prepayments, and lower interest rates are generally one factor that tends to lead to increased prepayments. Thus, by continuing to service sold mortgage loans, Citigroup is exposed to interest rate risk.

            In managing this risk, Citigroup hedges a significant portion of the value of its MSRs through the use of interest rate derivative contracts, forward purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and purchased securities classified as trading (primarily mortgage-backed securities including principal-only strips).

            Since the change in the value of these hedging instruments does not perfectly match the change in the value of the MSRs, Citigroup is still exposed to what is commonly referred to as "basis risk." Citigroup manages this risk by reviewing the mix of the various hedging instruments referred to above on a daily basis.

            Citigroup's MSRs totaled $3.976 billion and $6.530 billion at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. For additional information on Citi's MSRs, see Notes 11 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

            As part of the mortgage lending activity, Citigroup commonly enters into purchase commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at specific interest rates within a given period of time, generally up to 60 days after the rate has been set. If the resulting loans from these commitments will be classified as loans held-for-sale, Citigroup accounts for the commitments as derivatives. Accordingly, the initial and subsequent changes in the fair value of these commitments, which are driven by changes in mortgage interest rates, are recognized in current earnings after taking into consideration the likelihood that the commitment will be funded.

            Citigroup hedges its exposure to the change in the value of these commitments by utilizing hedging instruments similar to those referred to above.

    North America Cards

    Overview

            Citi's North America cards portfolio consists of its Citi-branded and retailRetail partner cards portfolios locatedreported in CiticorpCiticorp—Regional Consumer Banking and Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending, respectively. As of September 30, 2009,2010, the U.S. Citi-branded portfolio totaled approximately $84$77 billion, while the U.S. retailRetail partner cards portfolio was approximately $57 billion, both reported on a managed basis.$46 billion.

            In the Company'seach of its Citi-branded and Retail partner cards portfolios, Citi continues to actively eliminate riskier accounts to mitigate losses. Higher risk customers have either had their available lines of credit reduced or their accounts closed. On a net basis, end of period open accounts are down 13% in Citi-branded cards and down 10% in Retail partner cards versus prior-year levels.

            As previously disclosed, in Citi's experience to date, these portfolios have significantly different characteristics:

      Citi-branded cards tend to have a longer estimated account life, with higher credit lines and balances reflecting the greater utility of a multi-purpose credit card.

      Retail partner cards tend to have a shorter account life, with smaller credit lines and balances. The account portfolio, by its nature, turns faster and the loan balances reflect more recent vintages.

            As a result, loss mitigation efforts, such as stricter underwriting standards for new accounts, decreasing higher risk credit lines, closing high risk accounts and re-pricing, have tended to affect the Retail partner cards portfolio faster than the branded portfolio. (See also "Consumer Loan Modification Programs" for a discussion of modification programs for card loans.)

            Citi continues to believe that net credit losses in each of its cards portfolios will likely continue to remain at elevated levels and will continue to be highly dependent on macroeconomic conditions and industry changes, including continued implementation of the CARD Act.

    Cards Quarterly Trends—Delinquencies and Net Credit Losses

            The following charts detail the quarterly trends in delinquencies and net credit losses for Citigroup'sNorth America Citi-branded and Retail partner cards portfolios.

            During the third quarter of 2010, each of the portfolios continued to show improvement in delinquencies and net credit losses. In Citi-branded cards, delinquencies declined for the third consecutive quarter while net credit losses declined for the second consecutive quarter. In Retail partner cards, delinquencies declined for the third consecutive quarter while net credit losses declined for the fifth consecutive quarter.


    Table of Contents

    GRAPHIC

    Note: Includes Puerto Rico.

    GRAPHIC

    Note: Includes Canada and Puerto Rico. Includes Installment Lending.


    Table of Contents

    North America Cards—FICO Information

            As set forth in the table below, on a refreshed basis approximately 73%75% of the Citi-branded portfolio had FICO credit scores of at least 660 on a refreshed basis as of September 30, 2009,2010, while 62%66% of the retailRetail partner cards portfolio had scores above 660. These percentages reflect a slight improvement since the statistics on a refreshed basis as of at least 660.June 30, 2010.

    Balances: September 30, 20092010

    Refreshed Citi Branded Retail Partners 

    FICO³ 660

      73% 62%

    620£FICO<660

      11% 13%

    FICO<620

      16% 25%
    Refreshed
     Citi Branded Retail Partners 

    FICO ³ 660

      75% 66%

    620 £ FICO < 660

      10% 13%

    FICO < 620

      15% 21%

    Note: Based on balances of $138 billion.$116 billion (decreased from $120 billion at June 30, 2010). Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico and Installment and Classified portfolios. Excludes balances where FICO was unavailable ($0.92.7 billion for Citi-branded, $2.2$2.0 billion for retailRetail partner cards). 90+DPD delinquency rate for balances where FICO was unavailable is 9.83% for Citi-branded and 9.38% for retail partner cards vs. overall rate of 2.63% for Citi-branded and 4.49% for retail partner cards.

            In each of the two portfolios, Citi has been actively eliminating riskier accounts and sales to mitigate losses. First, the Company has removed high risk customers from the portfolio by either reducing available lines of credit or closing accounts. End-of-period open accounts are down 16% in branded cards and 13% in retail partner cards versus prior year levels. Second, the Company has improved the tools used to identify and manage exposure in each of the portfolios by targeting unique customer attributes. Loss mitigation programs that entail a reduction in customers' monthly payments obligation constitutes less than 5% of the overall managed portfolio as of September 30, 2009. These programs along with other loss mitigation activities have stabilized reported delinquencies and net credit losses and importantly, early indicators of re-default rates related to these programs are within expected norms.


    Table of Contents

            The table below provides delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD for both the Citi-branded and retailRetail partner cards portfolios as of September 30, 2009.2010. Given the economic environment, customers have generally migrated down from higher FICO score ranges, driven by their delinquencies with Citi and/or with other creditors. As these customers roll through the delinquency buckets, they materially damage their credit score and may ultimately go to charge-off. Loans with FICO scores less than 620, which constitute 16% of the Citi-branded portfolio, have a 90+DPD rate of 15.2%; in the retail partner cards portfolio, loans with FICO scores less than 620 constitute 25% of the portfolio and have a 90+DPD rate of 16.8%.

    90+DPD Delinquency Rate: September 30, 2009

    Refreshed Citi Branded
    90+DPD%
     Retail Partners
    90+DPD%
     

    FICO³ 660

      0.1% 0.2%

    620£FICO<660

      0.3% 0.6%

    FICO<620

      15.2% 16.8%

    Note: Based on balances of $138 billion. Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico, Installment and Classified portfolios. Loans 90 days or more past due are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquency has been reported by the CompanyCitigroup to the credit bureaus.

            The following charts detail Loans with FICO scores less than 620, which constitute 15% of the quarterly trendsCiti-branded portfolio (down from 16% at June 30, 2010), have a 90+DPD rate of 15.0% (down from 16.3% at June 30, 2010); in delinquencies and net credit losses for the Company's N.A. Citi-branded and retailRetail partner cards portfolios.

      The Citi-branded cards delinquencies have improved quarter over quarter. Further breakoutportfolio, loans with FICO scores less than 620 constitute 21% (down from 22% at June 30, 2010) of the FICO below 620 segment indicates that delinquencies in this segment,portfolio and have a 90+DPD rate of 17.3% (up from 16.7% at June 30, 2010).

      90+DPD Delinquency Rate: September 30, 2010

      Refreshed
       Citi Branded
      90+DPD%
       Retail Partners
      90+DPD%
       

      FICO ³ 660

        0.1% 0.2%

      620 £ FICO < 660

        0.6% 0.8%

      FICO < 620

        15.0% 17.3%

      Note: Based on a refreshed basis, have contributed to the improvement.

      The retail partner cards delinquencies increased slightly over the prior quarter, exacerbated in part by the decline in loan balances but remain lower than the first quarter. Theof $116 billion (decreased from $120 billion at June 30, 2010). Balances include interest and fees. Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico and Installment and Classified portfolios. 90+DPD balance has declined since the first quarter, driving the reduction in net credit losses—both in rate and dollars.

            The Company believes that net credit losses in each of the cards portfolios will continue to remain at elevated levels and will continue to be highly dependentare based on the external environment and industry changes.


    Table of Contents

    GRAPHIC


    Note: Includes Puerto Rico.

    GRAPHIC


    Note: Includes Canada and Puerto Rico.

    The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009

            On May 22, 2009, The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 (CARD Act) was enacted into law. The CARD Act will affect various credit card practices of card issuers, including Citigroup, such as marketing, underwriting, pricing, billing and disclosure requirements, thus reshaping the way consumers have access to and use their credit cards. Currently, many of the provisionsbalances referenced in the CARD Act are to take effect in February 2010, although some provisions were effective in August 2009 and some will take effect in August 2010. However, legislation has been introduced in Congress to accelerate certain provisions of the CARD Act.

            Certain provisions of the CARD Act are consistent with Citigroup's existing practices and will not require any changes or modifications. Other provisions, however, such as those that restrict the ability of an issuer to increase APRs on outstanding balances or that establish standards for penalty fees and payment allocation, will require Citigroup to make fundamental changes to its credit card business model. The impact of the CARD Act on Citigroup's credit businesses is not fully known at this time. The final impact will ultimately depend upon the successful implementation of changes to Citigroup's business model and the continued regulatory actions on and interpretations of the CARD Act, among other considerations.


    Table of Contentstable above.


    U.S. Installment and Other Revolving Loans

            In the table below, the Company'sThe U.S. Installmentinstallment portfolio consists of consumer loans in the following businesses: Consumer Finance, Retail Banking, Auto, Student Lending and Cards. Other Revolving consists of consumer loans (Ready Credit and Checking Plus products) in the Consumer Retail Banking business. Commercial-related loans are not included.

            As of September 30, 2009,2010, the U.S. Installment portfolio totaled approximately $58$27 billion, while the U.S. Other Revolving portfolio was approximately $1$0.9 billion. In the table below, the U.S. Installment portfolio excludes the portion of loans associated with the previously-announced sale of The Student Loan Corporation, currently expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2010.

            While substantially all of the U.S. Installment portfolio is managed under reported inLCL within Citi Holdings, it does include $0.4 billion of Consumer Retail Banking loans which areis reported in Citicorp. The U.S. Other Revolving portfolio is managed under Citicorp. The U.S. Installment portfolio includes $21 billion of student loans originated under the Federal Family Education Loan Program where losses are substantially mitigated by federal guarantees if the loans are properly serviced.

    Approximately 44%48% of the Installment portfolio had FICO credit scores less than 620 on a refreshed basis. The Company continues to execute its strategy to wind down the assets in Citi Holdings. Approximately 29%28% of the Other Revolving portfolio is composed of loans having FICO less than 620.

    Balances: September 30, 20092010

    Refreshed
     Installment Other Revolving 

    FICO³ 660

      41% 56%

    620£FICO<660

      15% 15%

    FICO<620

      44% 29%
    Refreshed
     Installment Other Revolving 

    FICO ³ 660

      37% 57%

    620 £ FICO < 660

      16% 15%

    FICO < 620

      48% 28%

    Note: Based on balances of $56$26 billion for Installment and $0.9 billion for Other Revolving. Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico. Excludes balances where FICO was unavailable ($2.31.2 billion for Installment, $0.1 billion for Other Revolving)Installment). 90+ DPD delinquency rate for balances where FICO was unavailable is 3.55% for Installment and 6.34% for Other Revolving vs. overall rate of 2.84% for Installment and 3.12% for Other Revolving.

            The table below provides delinquency statistics for loans 90+DPD for both the Installment and Other Revolving portfolios. Loans 90+DPD are more likely to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicative of repayment risk and because their delinquency has been reported by Citigroup to the credit bureaus. On a refreshed basis, loans with FICO scores of less than 620 exhibit significantly higher delinquencies than in any other FICO band and will drive the majority of the losses.

    90+DPD Delinquency Rate: September 30, 20092010

    Refreshed
     Installment
    90+DPD%
     Other Revolving
    90+DPD%
     

    FICO³ 660

      0.1% 0.0%

    620£FICO<660

      0.3% 0.4%

    FICO<620

      6.2% 9.2%
    Refreshed
     Installment 90+DPD% Other Revolving 90+DPD% 

    FICO ³ 660

      0.2% 0.0%

    620 £ FICO < 660

      0.5% 0.3%

    FICO < 620

      7.4% 8.7%

    Note: Based on balances of $56$26 billion for Installment and $0.9 billion for Other Revolving. Excludes Canada and Puerto Rico. Loans90+DPD are based on balances referenced in the table above.


    Table of Contents

    FICO and LTV Trend Information—North America Cards

    Citi Branded Cards ($B)Retail Partner Cards ($B)

    GRAPHIC


    GRAPHIC

    Note: Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico and Installment and Classified portfolios. Balances include interest and fees. Balances based on refreshed FICO. Chart also excludes balances for which FICO was unavailable ($0.7 billion in 4Q09, $2.4 billion in 1Q10, $2.4 billion in 2Q10 and $2.7 billion in 3Q10).


    Note: Excludes Canada, Puerto Rico and Installment and Classified portfolios. Balances include interest and fees. Balances based on refreshed FICO. Chart also excludes balances for which FICO was unavailable ($2.1billion in 4Q09, $2.1billion in 1Q10, $2.1billion in 2Q10 and $2.0 billion in 3Q10).

            As of September 30, 2010, the Citi-branded portfolio totaled approximately $76 billion, a reduction of $7 billion or 9% from December 2009 primarily driven by lower balances in the FICO below 660 segment. In the Citi-branded cards portfolio, loans with refreshed FICO scores below 660 were $18.6 billion as of September 30, 2010, $4 billion or 18% lower than the balance as of December 2009. Similarly, the Retail partner cards portfolio was approximately $44 billion as of September 30, 2010, a reduction of $12 billion or 21% from December 2009. In the Retail partner cards portfolio, loans with refreshed FICO scores below 660 were $14.6 billion as of September 30, 2010, $5.4 billion or 27% lower than the balance as of December 31, 2009.


    Table of Contents


    Consumer Loan Details

    Consumer Loan Delinquency Amounts and Ratios

     
     Total loans(7) 90+ days past due(1) 30-89 days past due(1) 
    In millions of dollars, except EOP loan amounts in billions Sep.
    2010
     Sep.
    2010
     Jun.
    2010
     Sep.
    2009
     Sep.
    2010
     Jun.
    2010
     Sep.
    2009
     

    Citicorp(2)(3)(4)

                          

    Total

     $224.8 $3,377 $3,733 $3,899 $3,728 $3,858 $4,352 
     

    Ratio

         1.51% 1.71% 1.74% 1.66% 1.77% 1.94%
                    

    Retail Bank

                          
     

    Total

      113.7  787  804  695  1,185  1,131  1,013 
      

    Ratio

         0.70% 0.74% 0.64% 1.05% 1.04% 0.94%
     

    North America

      29.4  221  245  92  243  241  82 
      

    Ratio

         0.77% 0.81% 0.27% 0.85% 0.80% 0.24%
     

    EMEA

      4.7  40  50  62  142  145  230 
      

    Ratio

         0.85% 1.16% 1.09% 3.02% 3.37% 4.04%
     

    Latin America

      20.8  310  308  279  377  305  315 
      

    Ratio

         1.49% 1.57% 1.58% 1.81% 1.56% 1.78%
     

    Asia

      58.8  216  201  262  423  440  386 
      

    Ratio

         0.37% 0.37% 0.52% 0.72% 0.80% 0.77%
                    

    Citi-Branded Cards

                          
     

    Total

      111.1  2,590  2,929  3,204  2,543  2,727  3,399 
      

    Ratio

         2.33% 2.68% 2.74% 2.29% 2.49% 2.86%
     

    North America

      76.6  1,807  2,130  2,190  1,687  1,828  2,213 
      

    Ratio

         2.36% 2.76% 2.59% 2.20% 2.37% 2.61%
     

    EMEA

      2.9  69  72  90  86  90  155 
      

    Ratio

         2.38% 2.77% 3.00% 2.97% 3.46% 5.17%
     

    Latin America

      12.6  472  481  609  442  485  604 
      

    Ratio

         3.75% 4.01% 5.03% 3.51% 4.04% 4.99%
     

    Asia

      19.0  242  246  315  328  324  367 
      

    Ratio

         1.27% 1.40% 1.85% 1.73% 1.84% 2.16%
                    

    Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending(2)(3)(5)(6)

                          
     

    Total

      237.8  11,824  14,371  18,123  10,408  11,201  14,848 
      

    Ratio

         5.23% 5.24% 5.72% 4.61% 4.08% 4.69%
     

    International

      24.7  713  724  1,465  978  939  1,733 
      

    Ratio

         2.89% 2.94% 4.01% 3.96% 3.82% 4.75%
     

    North America Retail partner cards

      46.0  1,749  2,004  2,587  1,972  2,150  2,911 
      

    Ratio

         3.80% 3.99% 4.23% 4.29% 4.28% 4.76%
     

    North America (excluding cards)

      167.1  9,362  11,643  14,071  7,458  8,112  10,204 
      

    Ratio

         6.03% 5.84% 6.42% 4.81% 4.07% 4.66%
                    

    Total Citigroup (excludingSpecial Asset Pool)

     $462.6 $15,201 $18,104 $22,022 $14,136 $15,059 $19,200 
      

    Ratio

         3.38% 3.67% 4.07% 3.14% 3.06% 3.55%
                    

    (1)
    The ratios of 90 days or more past due and 30 to 89 days past due are calculated based on end-of-period loans.

    (2)
    The 90 days or more likelypast due balances for Citi-branded cards and Retail partner cards are generally still accruing interest. Citigroup's policy is generally to be associated with low refreshed FICO scores both because low scores are indicativeaccrue interest on credit card loans until 180 days past due, unless notification of repayment risk and because their delinquencybankruptcy filing has been received earlier.

    (3)
    The above information presents consumer credit information on a managed basis. Citigroup adopted SFAS 166/167 effective January 1, 2010. As a result, beginning in the first quarter of 2010, there is no longer a difference between reported by the Companyand managed delinquencies. Prior quarters' managed delinquencies are included herein for comparative purposes to the 2010 delinquencies. Managed basis reporting historically impacted theNorth America Regional Consumer Banking—Citi-branded cards and theLocal Consumer Lending—Retail partner cards businesses. The historical disclosures reflect the impact from credit bureaus.card securitizations only. See discussion of adoption of SFAS 166/167 on page 3 and in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

    (4)
    The 90 days or more and 30 to 89 days past due and related ratios forNorth America Regional Consumer Banking excludes U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies since the potential loss predominantly resides within the U.S. agencies. The amounts excluded for loans 90 days or more past due and (end-of-period loans) are $188 million ($0.8 billion) as of September 30, 2010. The amount excluded for loans 30 to 89 days past due (end-of-period loans have the same adjustment as above) is $15 million.

    (5)
    The 90 days or more and 30 to 89 days past due and related ratios forNorth America LCL excludes U.S. mortgage loans that are guaranteed by U.S. government sponsored agencies since the potential loss predominantly resides within the U.S. agencies. The amounts excluded for loans 90 days or more past due and (end-of-period loans) for each period are: $5.0 billion ($9.5 billion), $5.0 billion ($9.4 billion), and $4.9 billion ($8.3 billion) as of September 30, 2010, June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The amounts excluded for loans 30 to 89 days past due (end-of-period loans have the same adjustment as above) for each period are: $1.7 billion, $1.6 billion, and $0.8 billion, as of September 30, 2010, June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively.

    Table of Contents

    (6)
    The September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 loans 90 days or more past due and 30-89 days past due and related ratios for North America excludes $2.4 billion and $2.6 billion, respectively, of loans that are carried at fair value.

    (7)
    Total loans include interest and fees on credit cards.


    Consumer Loan Net Credit Losses and Ratios

     
     Average
    loans(1)
     Net credit losses(2) 
    In millions of dollars, except average loan amounts in billions 3Q10 3Q10 2Q10 3Q09 

    Citicorp

                 

    Total

     $221.0 $2,731 $2,922 $1,442 
     

    Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

             1,876 
     

    Managed NCL

        $2,731 $2,922 $3,318 
     

    Ratio

         4.90% 5.38% 5.97%
              

    Retail Bank

                 
     

    Total

      111.5  333  304  395 
      

    Ratio

         1.18% 1.12% 1.48%
     

    North America

      29.7  90  79  78 
      

    Ratio

         1.20% 1.03% 0.90%
     

    EMEA

      4.5  34  46  84 
      

    Ratio

         3.00% 4.10% 5.85%
     

    Latin America

      20.3  128  96  114 
      

    Ratio

         2.50% 1.98% 2.68%
     

    Asia

      57.0  81  83  119 
      

    Ratio

         0.56% 0.61% 0.96%
              

    Citi-Branded Cards

                 
     

    Total

      109.5  2,398  2,618  1,047 
      

    Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

             1,876 
      

    Managed NCL

         2,398  2,618  2,923 
      

    Ratio

         8.69% 9.68% 10.14%
     

    North America

      76.0  1,881  2,047  201 
      

    Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

             1,876 
      

    Managed NCL

         1,881  2,047  2,077 
      

    Ratio

         9.82% 10.77% 9.98%
     

    EMEA

      2.8  31  39  55 
      

    Ratio

         4.39% 5.79% 7.27%
     

    Latin America

      12.3  322  361  543 
      

    Ratio

         10.39% 12.07% 17.80%
     

    Asia

      18.4  164  171  248 
      

    Ratio

         3.54% 3.90% 5.89%
              

    Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending

                 
     

    Total

      248.4  3,949  4,535  4,912 
      

    Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

             1,137 
      

    Managed NCL

         3,949  4,535  6,049 
      

    Ratio

         6.31% 6.03% 7.21%
     

    International

      25.0  444  495  957 
      

    Ratio

         7.05% 7.61% 9.79%
     

    North America Retail partner cards

      48.8  1,505  1,775  867 
      

    Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

             1,137 
      

    Managed NCL

         1,505  1,775  2,004 
      

    Ratio

         12.24% 13.41% 12.76%
     

    North America (excluding cards)

      174.6  2,000  2,265  3,088 
      

    Ratio

         4.54% 4.08% 5.29%
              

    Total Citigroup (excludingSpecial Asset Pool)

     $469.4 $6,680 $7,457 $6,354 
      

    Add: impact of credit card securitizations(3)

             3,013 
      

    Managed NCL

         6,680  7,457  9,367 
      

    Ratio

         5.65% 5.76% 6.72%
              

    (1)
    Average loans include interest and fees on credit cards.

    (2)
    The ratios of net credit losses are calculated based on average loans, net of unearned income.

    (3)
    See page 3 and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the impact of SFAS 166/167.

    Table of Contents


    CorporateConsumer Loan DetailsModification Programs

            Citigroup has instituted a variety of modification programs to assist borrowers with financial difficulties. These programs, as described below, include modifying the original loan terms, reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. At September 30, 2010, Citi's significant modification programs consisted of the U.S. Treasury's Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP), as well as short-term and long-term modification programs in the U.S., each as summarized below.

            The policy for re-aging modified U.S. consumer loans to current status varies by product. Generally, one of the conditions to qualify for these modifications is that a minimum number of payments (typically ranging from one to three) be made. Upon modification, the loan is re-aged to current status. However, re-aging practices for certain open-ended consumer loans, such as credit cards, are governed by Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) guidelines. For corporate clientssuch open-ended consumer loans subject to FFIEC guidelines, one of the conditions for the loan to be re-aged to current status is that at least three consecutive minimum monthly payments, or the equivalent amount, must be received. In addition, under FFIEC guidelines, the number of times that such a loan can be re-aged is subject to limitations (generally once in 12 months and investment banking activities acrosstwice in five years). Furthermore, Federal Housing Administration (FHA) and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) loans are modified under those respective agencies' guidelines, and payments are not always required in order to re-age a modified loan to current.

            In the determination of the allowance for loan losses for troubled debt restructurings (TDRs), Citigroup considers a combination of historical re-default rates, the creditcurrent economic environment, and the nature of the modification program in forecasting expected cash flows.

    HAMP and Other Long-Term Programs.

            Long-term modification programs or TDRs occur when the terms of a loan have been modified due to the borrowers' financial difficulties and a long-term concession has been granted to the borrower. Substantially all long-term programs in place provide interest rate reductions. See "Loan Accounting Policies" in Citi's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 for a discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.

            The following table presents Citigroup's consumer loan TDRs as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009. As discussed below under "HAMP," HAMP loans whose terms are contractually modified after successful completion of the trial period are included in the balances below:

     
     Accrual Non-accrual 
    In millions of dollars Sept. 30,
    2010
     Dec. 31,
    2009
     Sept. 30,
    2010
     Dec. 31,
    2009
     

    Mortgage and real estate

     $14,119 $8,654 $1,949 $1,413 

    Cards(1)

      5,265  2,303  33  150 

    Installment and other

      3,408  3,128  350  250 
              

    (1)
    2010 balances reflect the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

            These TDRs are predominately concentrated in the U.S. Citi's significant long-term U.S. modification programs include:

    Mortgages

            HAMP.    The HAMP is designed to reduce monthly first mortgage payments to a 31% housing debt ratio (monthly mortgage payment, including property taxes, insurance and homeowner dues, divided by monthly gross income) by lowering the interest rate, extending the term of the loan and deferring or forgiving principal of certain eligible borrowers who have defaulted on their mortgages or who are at risk of imminent default due to economic hardship. The interest rate reduction for first mortgages under HAMP is in effect for five years and the rate then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate cap (the lower of the original rate or the Freddie Mac Weekly Primary Mortgage Market Survey rate for a 30-year fixed rate conforming loan as of the date of the modification) is reached.

            In order to be entitled to loan modifications, borrowers must complete a three- to five-month trial period, make the agreed payments and provide the required documentation. Beginning March 1, 2010, documentation is required to be provided prior to beginning the trial period, whereas prior to that date, it was required before the end of the trial period. This change generally means that Citi is able to verify income up front for potential HAMP participants before they begin making lower monthly payments. Early signs indicate that this change will increase the percentage of borrowers who will successfully complete the trial period.

            During the trial period, Citi requires that the original terms of the loans remain in effect pending completion of the modification. From inception through September 30, 2010, approximately $9.1 billion of first mortgages were enrolled in the HAMP trial period, while $3.1 billion have successfully completed the trial period. Upon completion of the trial period, the terms of the loan are contractually modified, and it is accounted for as a TDR.

            Citi has also agreed to participate in the U.S. Treasury's HAMP second mortgage program (2MP) beginning October 1, 2010. 2MP requires Citi to either: (1) modify the borrower's second mortgage according to a defined protocol; or (2) accept a lump sum payment from the U.S. Treasury in exchange for full extinguishment of the second mortgage. For a borrower to qualify, the borrower must have successfully modified his/her first mortgage under the HAMP and met other criteria. Under the 2MP program, if the first mortgage is modified under HAMP and receives a principal forgiveness, the same percentage of principal forgiveness is required on the second mortgage.

            Loans included in the HAMP trial period are not classified as modified under short-term or long-term programs, and the allowance for loan losses for these loans is calculated under ASC 450-20.

            As of September 30, 2010, excluding the number of loans that are still in the trial period, 33% of the loans were successfully modified under HAMP, 13% were modified under the Citi Supplemental program (see below), 17% received HAMP Re-age (see below), and 37% have not received any modification from Citi to date.


    Table of Contents

            Citi Supplemental.    The Citi Supplemental (CSM) program was designed by Citi to assist borrowers ineligible for HAMP or who become ineligible through the HAMP trial period process. If the borrower already has less than a 31% housing debt ratio, the modification offered is an interest rate reduction (up to 2.5% with a floor rate of 4%) which is in effect for two years, and the rate then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate is at the pre-modified contractual rate. If the borrower's housing debt ratio is greater than 31%, specific treatment steps for HAMP, including an interest rate reduction, will be followed to achieve a 31% housing debt ratio. The modified interest rate is in effect for two years, and then increases up to 1% per year until the interest rate is at the pre-modified contractual rate. If income documentation was not supplied previously for HAMP, it is required for CSM. Three or more trial payments are required prior to modification. These payments can be made during the HAMP and/or CSM trial period.

            HAMP Re-Age.    As previously disclosed, loans in the HAMP trial period are aged according to their original contractual terms, rather than the modified HAMP terms. This results in the receivable being reported as delinquent even if the reduced payments agreed to under the program are made by the borrower. Upon conclusion of the trial period, loans that do not qualify for a long-term modification are returned to the delinquency status in which they began their trial period. However, that delinquency status would be further deteriorated for each trial payment not made (HAMP Re-age). HAMP Re-age establishes a non-interest-bearing deferral based on the difference between the original contractual amounts due and the HAMP trial payments made. Citigroup considers this re-age and deferral process to constitute a concession to a borrower in financial difficulty and therefore records the loans as TDRs upon re-age.

            2nd FDIC.    The 2nd FDIC modification program guidelines were created by the FDIC for delinquent or current borrowers where default is groundedreasonably foreseeable. The program is designed for second mortgages and uses various concessions, including interest rate reductions, non-interest-bearing principal deferral, principal forgiveness, extending maturity dates, and forgiving accrued interest and late fees. These potential concessions are applied in a series of fundamental policies, including:steps (similar to HAMP) that provides an affordable payment to the borrower (generally a combined housing payment ratio of 42%). The first step generally reduces the borrower's interest rate to 2% for fixed-rate home equity loans and 0.5% for home equity lines of credit. The interest rate reduction is in effect for the remaining term of the loan.

            FHA/VA.    Loans guaranteed by the FHA or VA are modified through the normal modification process required by those respective agencies. Borrowers must be delinquent and concessions include interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness, extending maturity dates, and forgiving accrued interest and late fees. The interest rate reduction is in effect for the remaining loan term. Losses on FHA loans are borne by the sponsoring agency provided that the insurance has not been breached as a result of an origination defect. The VA establishes a loan-level loss cap, beyond which Citi is liable for loss. Historically, Citi's losses on FHA and VA loans have been negligible.

            CFNA Adjustment of Terms (AOT).    This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a permanent hardship. Payment reduction is provided through the re-amortization of the remaining loan balance, typically at a lower interest rate. Modified loan tenors may not exceed a period of 480 months. Generally, the rescheduled payment cannot be less than 50% of the original payment amount unless the AOT is a result of participation in the CitiFinancial Home Affordability Modification Program (CHAMP) or military service member's Credit Relief Act Program (SCRA), or as a result of settlement, court order, judgment, or bankruptcy. Customers must make a qualifying payment at the reduced payment amount in order to qualify for the modification. In addition, customers must provide income verification (pay stubs and/or tax returns) and monthly obligations are validated through an updated credit report.

            Other.    Prior to the implementation of the HAMP, CSM and 2nd FDIC programs, Citigroup's U.S. mortgage business offered certain borrowers various tailored modifications, which included reducing interest rates, extending the remaining loan duration and/or waiving a portion of the remaining principal balance. Citigroup currently believes that substantially all of its future long-term U.S. mortgage modifications, at least in the near term, will be included in the programs mentioned above.

    Impact of Mortgage Modification Programs

            Citi considers various metrics in analyzing the success of U.S. mortgage loan modifications. Payment behavior of customers during the modification (both short-term and long-term) is monitored. For short-term modifications, performance is also measured for an additional period of time after the expiration of the concession. Balance reductions and annualized loss rates are important metrics that are monitored. Based on actual experience, program terms, including eligibility criteria, interest charged and loan tenor, may be refined.

            The main objective of the mortgage modification programs is to reduce the payment burden for the borrower and improve the net present value of Citi's expected cash flows. The total balance reduction for modifications in the Other category (noted above and in the table below) after 24 months is approximately 34% (as a percentage of the balance at the time of modification), consisting of approximately 19% of paydowns and 15% of net credit losses. At 18 months after modifying an account, in Citi's experience to date, credit loss rates are estimated to be reduced by approximately one-third compared to accounts that were not modified. The HAMP and CSM programs have less vintage history and limited loss data. However, performance of the HAMP and CSM programs are currently tracking to Citi's expectations and are currently expected to perform better than the pre-HAMP modifications discussed above.

            The total balance reduction for long-term CFNA Real Estate AOTs after 24 months is approximately 14% (as a percentage of the balance at the time of modification), consisting of approximately 5% of paydowns and 9% of net credit losses. The U.S. Consumer Mortgage Temporary AOT program (described under Short-Term Programs) has less vintage history and limited loss data.


    Table of Contents

    North America Cards

            Paydown.    The Paydown program is designed to liquidate a customer's balance within 60 months. It is available to customers who indicate a long-term hardship (e.g., long-term disability, medical issues or a non-temporary income reduction, such as an occupation change). Payment requirements are decreased by reducing interest rates charged to either 9.9% or 0%, depending upon the customer situation, and designed to amortize at least 1.67% of the balance each month. Under this program, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.

            CCG.    The CCG program handles proposals received via external consumer credit counselors on the customer's behalf. In order to qualify, customers work with a credit counseling agency to develop a plan to handle their overall budget, including money owed to Citi. A copy of the counseling agency's proposal letter is required. The annual percentage rate (APR) is reduced to 9.9%. The account fully amortizes in 60 months. Under this program, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.

            Interest Reversal Paydown.    The Interest Reversal Paydown program is also designed to liquidate a customer's balance within 60 months. It is available to customers who indicate a long-term hardship. Accumulated interest and fees owed to Citi are reversed upon enrollment, and future interest and fees are discontinued. Payment requirements are reduced and are designed to amortize at least 1.67% of the balance each month. Under this program, like the programs discussed above, fees are discontinued, and charging privileges are permanently rescinded.

    Impact of Cards Modification Programs

            Citi considers various metrics in analyzing the success of North America credit card loan modifications. Payment behavior of customers during the modification (both short-term and long-term modifications) is monitored. For short-term modifications, performance is also measured for an additional period of time after the expiration of the concession. Balance reductions and annualized loss rates are important metrics that are monitored. Based on actual experience, program terms, including eligibility criteria, interest charged and loan tenor, may be refined.

            The main objective of the credit card modification programs is to reduce the payment burden for the borrower and improve the net present value of Citi's expected cash flows. Total balance reduction for long-term modifications after 24 months is approximately 60-70% (as a percentage of the balance at the time of modification), consisting of approximately 30-40% of paydowns and 30% of net credit losses. It is Citi's experience that these credit losses are approximately one-third lower, depending upon the individual program and vintage, than those of similar accounts that were not modified.

            Twenty-four months after starting a short-term modification, balances are reduced by approximately 60-70% (as a percentage of the balance at the time of modification), consisting of approximately 20-30% of paydowns and 40% of net credit losses. It is Citi's experience that these credit losses are approximately one-sixth lower, depending upon the individual program and vintage, than those of similar accounts that were not modified.

            Based on Citi's experience to date and after consideration of the continuing challenging economic environment, Citigroup will be implementing certain changes to its credit card modification programs beginning in the fourth quarter of 2010, including revisions to the eligibility criteria for modification programs. As a result of these changes, Citi expects the overall volume of new entrants to these modification programs to decrease, particularly for short-term programs. While Citi also expects these changes to negatively impact net credit losses beginning in 2011, Citi believes overall that net credit losses will continue to improve in 2011 for each of the North America Cards businesses. Citi has considered these changes to the modification programs and their effect on net credit losses in determining the loan loss reserve as of September 30, 2010.

    U.S. Installment Loans

            CFNA AOT.    This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a permanent hardship. Payment reduction is provided through the re-amortization of the remaining loan balance, typically at a lower interest rate. Loan payments may be rescheduled over a period not to exceed 120 months. Generally, the rescheduled payment cannot be less than 50% of the original payment amount, unless the AOT is a result of a military service member's SCRA, or as a result of settlement, court order, judgment or bankruptcy. The interest rate generally cannot be reduced below 9% (except in the instances listed above). Customers must make a qualifying payment at the reduced payment amount in order to qualify for the modification. In addition, customers must provide proof of income and monthly obligations are validated through an updated credit report.

    Impact of Installment Loan Modification Programs

            Citi considers various metrics in analyzing the success of U.S. installment loan modifications. Payment behavior of customers during the modification (both short-term and long-term modifications) is monitored. For short-term modifications, performance is also measured for an additional period of time after the expiration of the concession. Balance reductions and annualized loss rates are important metrics that are monitored. Based on actual experience, program terms, including eligibility criteria, interest charged and loan tenor, may be refined.

            The main objective of the installment loan modification programs is to reduce the payment burden for the borrower and improve the net present value of Citi's expected cash flows. The total balance reduction for CFNA AOT modifications after 24 months is approximately 50% (as a percentage of the balance at the time of modification), consisting of approximately 10-15% of paydowns and 35-40% of net credit losses. The Temporary AOT program (described under Short-term Programs) has less vintage history and limited loss data.


    Table of Contents

    Long Term Modification Programs—Summary

            The following table sets forth, as of September 30, 2010, information relating to Citi's significant long-term U.S. mortgage, card and installment loan modification programs:

    In millions of dollars Program
    balance
     Program
    start date(1)
     Average
    interest rate
    reduction
     Average %
    payment relief
     Average
    tenor of
    modified loans
     Deferred
    principal
     Principal
    forgiveness
     

    U.S. Consumer Mortgage Lending

                         
     

    HAMP

     $2,868  3Q09  4% 41%32 years $373 $2 
     

    Citi Supplemental

      1,197  4Q09  3% 25%28 years  61  1 
     

    HAMP Re-age(2)

      354  1Q10  N/A  N/A 24 years  7   
     

    2nd FDIC

      368  2Q09  6% 47%21 years  25  6 
     

    FHA/VA(3)

      3,140     2% 20%28 years     
     

    Adjustment of Terms (AOTs)

      3,829     3% 23%29 years       
     

    Other

      3,541     4% 41%27 years  43  47 

    North America Cards

                         
     

    Paydown

      2,308     15%  5 years       
     

    CCG

      1,790     9%  5 years       
     

    Interest Reversal Paydown

      255     20%  5 years       

    U.S. Installment

                         
     

    CFNA AOTs

      1,000     8% 35%9 years       
                    

    (1)
    Provided if program was introduced within the last 18 months.

    (2)
    Approximately $30 million reported at June 30, 2010 were modified in a Citi Supplemental program and approximately $85 million were sold.

    (3)
    Approximately $1 billion reported at June 30, 2010 were transferred to Held for Sale in the third quarter.

            Short-term Programs.    Citigroup has also instituted short-term programs (primarily in the U.S.) to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships. These programs include short-term (12 months or less) interest rate reductions and deferrals of past due payments. The loan volume under these short-term programs has increased significantly over the past 18 months, and loan loss reserves for these loans have been enhanced, giving consideration to the higher risk associated with those borrowers and reflecting the estimated future credit losses for those loans. See "Loan Accounting Policies" in Citi's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 for a discussion of the allowance for loan losses for such modified loans.

            The following table presents the amounts of gross loans modified under short-term interest rate reduction programs in the U.S. as of September 30, 2010:

     
     September 30, 2010 
    In millions of dollars Accrual Non-accrual 

    Cards

     $3,497   

    Mortgage and real estate

      1,775 $67 

    Installment and other

      1,393  97 
          

    Table of Contents

            Significant short-term U.S. programs include:

    North America Cards

            Universal Payment Program (UPP).    The North America cards business provides short-term interest rate reductions to assist borrowers experiencing temporary hardships through the UPP. Under this program, a participant's APR is reduced by at least 500 basis points for a period of up to 12 months. The minimum payment is established based upon the customer's specific circumstances and is designed to amortize at least 1% of the principal balance each month. The participant's APR returns to its original rate at the end of the program or earlier if they fail to make the required payments.

            As a result of the changes to be made to the credit card modification programs, as mentioned above, Citi expects the volume of new entrants to be lower for UPP. The impact will be closely monitored.

    Mortgages

            Temporary AOT.    This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a temporary hardship. Examples of temporary hardships would include a short-term medical disability or a temporary reduction of pay. Under this program, which can include both an interest rate reduction and a term extension, the interest rate is reduced for either a five- or an eleven-month period. At the end of the temporary modification period, the interest rate reverts to the pre-modification rate. If the customer is still undergoing hardship at the conclusion of the temporary payment reduction, a second extension of the temporary terms can be considered in either of the time period increments above. In cases where the account is severely past due (over 60 days past due) at the expiration of the temporary modification period, the terms of the modification are made permanent and the payment is kept at the reduced amount for the remaining life of the loan.

    U.S Installment Loans

            Temporary AOT.    This program is targeted to Consumer Finance customers with a temporary hardship. Under this program, which can include both an interest rate reduction and a term extension, the interest rate is reduced for either a five- or an eleven-month period. At the end of the temporary modification period, the interest rate reverts to the pre-modification rate. If the customer is still undergoing hardship at the conclusion of the temporary payment reduction, a second extension of the temporary terms can be considered in either of the time period increments above. In cases where the account is severely past due (over 90 days past due) at the expiration of the temporary modification period, the terms of the modification are made permanent and the payment is kept at the reduced amount for the remaining life of the loan.

    Short Term Modification Programs—Summary

            The following table sets forth, as of September 30, 2010, information related to Citi's significant short-term U.S. cards, mortgage, and installment loan modification programs:

    In millions of dollars Program
    balance
     Program
    start date(1)
     Average
    interest rate
    reduction
     Average
    time period
    for
    reduction

    UPP

     $3,497     19%12 months

    U.S. Consumer Mortgage Temporary AOT

      1,824  1Q09  3%8 months

    U.S. Installment Temporary AOT

      1,488  1Q09  5%7 months
             

    (1)
    Provided if program was introduced within the last 18 months.

            Payment deferrals that do not continue to accrue interest (extensions) primarily occur in the U.S. residential mortgage business. Under an extension, payments that are contractually due are deferred to a later date, thereby extending the maturity date by the number of months of payments being deferred. Extensions assist delinquent borrowers who have experienced short-term financial difficulties that have been resolved by the time the extension is granted. An extension can only be offered to borrowers who are past due on their monthly payments but have since demonstrated the ability and willingness to pay as agreed. Other payment deferrals continue to accrue interest and are not deemed to offer concessions to the customer. Other types of concessions are not material.


    Table of Contents


    Consumer Mortgage Representations and Warranties

            The majority of Citi's exposure to representation and warranty claims relates to its U.S. consumer mortgage business.

            When selling a loan, Citi (through its CitiMortgage business) makes various representations and warranties relating to, among other things, the following:

      joint business and independent risk management responsibility for managing credit risks;Citi's ownership of the loan;

      a single centerthe validity of control for each credit relationship that coordinates credit activities with that client;the lien securing the loan;

      portfolio limits to ensure diversification and maintain risk/capital alignment;the absence of delinquent taxes or liens against the property securing the loan;

      a minimumthe effectiveness of two authorized-credit-officer signatures requiredtitle insurance on extensions of credit, one of which must be from a credit officer in credit risk management;the property securing the loan;

      risk rating standards,the process used in selecting the loans for inclusion in a transaction;

      the loan's compliance with any applicable to every obligor and facility;loan criteria established by the buyer; and

      consistent standards for credit origination documentationthe loan's compliance with applicable local, state and remedial management.federal laws.

    The specific representations and warranties made by Citi depend on the nature of the transaction and the requirements of the buyer. Market conditions and credit-rating agency requirements may also affect representations and warranties and the other provisions to which Citi may agree in loan sales.

            Citi's representations and warranties are generally not subject to stated limits in amount or time of coverage. However, contractual liability arises only when the representations and warranties are breached and generally only when a loss results from the breach. In the event of a breach of these representations and warranties, Citi may be required to either repurchase the mortgage loans (generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest) with the identified defects or indemnify ("make-whole") the investors for their losses.

            For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, over 75% of Citi's repurchases and make-whole payments were attributable to misrepresentation of facts by either the borrower or a third party (e.g., income, employment, debts, FICO, etc.), appraisal issues (e.g., an error or misrepresentation of value), and program requirements (e.g., a loan that does not meet investor guidelines such as contractual interest rate). For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the comparable percentages were 79% and 65%, respectively. To date, there has not been a meaningful difference in incurred or estimated loss for each type of defect.

    Corporate        In the case of a repurchase, Citi will bear any subsequent credit loss on the mortgage loan and the loan is typically considered a credit-impaired loan and accounted for under SOP 03-3, "Accounting for Certain Loans and Debt Securities, Acquired in a Transfer" (now incorporated into ASC 310-30,Receivables—Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit PortfolioQuality). These repurchases have not had a material impact on Citi's non-performing loan statistics because credit-impaired purchased SOP 03-3 loans are not included in non-accrual loans, since they generally continue to accrue interest until write off.

            As evidenced by the tables below, to date, Citi's repurchases have primarily been from the government sponsored entities (GSEs).

            The unpaid principal balance of loans repurchased due to representation and warranty claims for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was as follows:

     
     Three months ended September 30, 
     
     2010 2009 
    In millions of dollars Unpaid Principal
    Balance
     Unpaid Principal
    Balance
     

    GSEs

     $53 $82 

    Private investors

      11  4 
          

    Total

     $64 $86 
          

            The unpaid principal balance of loans repurchased due to representation and warranty claims for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was as follows:

     
     Nine months ended September 30, 
     
     2010 2009 
    In millions of dollars Unpaid Principal
    Balance
     Unpaid Principal
    Balance
     

    GSEs

     $203 $238 

    Private investors

      23  14 
          

    Total

     $226 $252 
          

            In addition, Citi recorded make-whole payments of $73 million and $6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively, and $139 million and $30 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively.

            Citi has recorded a reserve for its exposure to losses from the obligation to repurchase previously sold loans (repurchase reserve) that is included inOther liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The repurchase reserve considers reimbursements estimated to be received by Citi from third-party correspondent lenders and indemnification agreements relating to previous acquisitions of mortgage servicing rights. In the case of a repurchase of a credit-impaired SOP 03-3 loan, the difference between the loan's fair value and unpaid principal balance at the time of the repurchase is recorded as a utilization of the repurchase reserve. Make-whole payments to the investor are also treated as utilizations and charged directly against the reserve. The repurchase reserve is estimated when Citi sells loans (recorded as an adjustment to the gain on sale, which is included inOther revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income) and is updated quarterly. Any change in estimate is recorded inOther revenue.

            The repurchase reserve is calculated separately by sales vintage (i.e., the year the loans were sold) based on various assumptions. While substantially all of Citi's current loan sales are with GSEs with which Citi has considerable historical experience, these assumptions contain a level of uncertainty and risk that, if different from actual results, could have a material impact on the reserve amounts. The most significant assumptions used to calculate the reserve levels are as follows:

      Loan documentation requests: Assumptions regarding future expected loan documentation requests exist as a means to predict future repurchase demand trends. These assumptions are based on recent historical trends as well as anecdotal evidence and general industry knowledge about the current repurchase environment. For example, Citi has

    Table of Contents

          observed an increase in the level of staffing and focus by the GSEs to "put" more loans back to servicers. These factors are considered in the forecast of expected future repurchase claims and changes in these trends could have a positive or negative impact on Citi's repurchase reserve. During 2009 and the nine months ended September 30, 2010, loan documentation requests were trending higher than in previous periods, which increased the repurchase reserve.

        Repurchase claims as a percentage of loan documentation requests: Given that loan documentation requests are an indicator of future repurchase claims, an assumption is made regarding the conversion rate from loan documentation requests to repurchase claims. This assumption is based on historical performance and, if actual rates differ in the future, could also impact repurchase reserve levels. This percentage was generally stable during 2009 and the first quarter of 2010, but has deteriorated slightly in the second and third quarters of 2010.

        Claims appeal success rate: This assumption represents Citi's expected success at rescinding an investor claim by satisfying the investor demand for more information, disputing the claim validity, etc. This assumption is based on recent historical successful appeals rates. These rates could fluctuate and, in Citi's experience, have historically fluctuated significantly based on changes in the validity or composition of claims. Generally, during 2009 and 2010 to date, Citi's appeal success rate improved from levels in prior periods, which had a favorable impact on the repurchase reserve.

        Estimated loss given repurchase or make-whole: The assumption of the estimated loss amount per repurchase or make-whole payment is applied separately for each sales vintage to capture volatile housing price highs and lows. The assumption is based on actual and expected losses of recent repurchases/make-whole payments calculated for each sales vintage year, which are impacted by factors such as macroeconomic indicators including overall housing values. During 2009, the loss per loan on repurchases/make-whole payments increased. While Citi experienced stabilization in this metric during the first quarter of 2010, such metric has deteriorated in the second and third quarters of 2010.

              As stated above, the request for loan documentation packages is an early indicator of a potential claim. During 2009, loan documentation package requests and the level of outstanding claims increased. In addition, Citi's loss severity estimates increased during 2009 due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and its experience with actual losses at such time. As set forth in the tables below, these factors contributed to change in estimates for the repurchase reserve amounting to $33 million and $280 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.

              During the third quarter of 2010, loan documentation package requests, the loss per loan and the level of outstanding claims further increased. In addition, there was an overall deterioration in the other key assumptions due to the impact of macroeconomic factors and Citi's continued experience with actual losses. These factors contributed to the $322 million change in estimate for the repurchase reserve in the current quarter.

              As discussed above, the repurchase reserve is calculated by sales vintage. The majority of the repurchases in 2010 were from the 2006 through 2008 sales vintages and, in 2009, were from the 2006 and 2007 vintages, which also represent the vintages with the largest loss-given-repurchase. An insignificant percentage of 2010 and 2009 repurchases were from vintages prior to 2006, and Citi currently anticipates that this percentage will decrease, as those vintages are later in the credit cycle. Although early in the credit cycle, Citi has experienced improved repurchase and loss-given-repurchase statistics from the 2009 and 2010 vintages.

              As of September 30, 2010, Citi services loans previously sold as follows:

       
       September 30, 2010 
      In millions Number of
      Loans
       Unpaid
      Principal Balance
       

      Vintage Sold:

             

      2005 and Prior

        1.1 $120,109 

      2006

        0.3  45,631 

      2007

        0.3  57,017 

      2008

        0.4  65,544 

      2009

        0.3  65,077 

      2010

        0.2  38,748 

      Indemnifications(1)

        0.9  112,161 
            
       

      Total

        3.5 $504,287 
            

      (1)
      Represents loans serviced by CitiMortgage that are covered by indemnification agreements relating to previous acquisitions of mortgage servicing rights.

              Since 2000, Citi has sold $93 billion of loans to private investors, of which $49 billion were sold through securitizations. As of September 30, 2010, $41 billion of these loans (including $17 billion sold through securitizations) continue to be serviced by Citi and is included in the $504 billion of serviced loans above.

              The activity in the repurchase reserve for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was as follows:

       
       Three months ended
      September 30,
       
      In millions of dollars 2010 2009 

      Balance, beginning of period

       $727 $279 

      Additions for new sales

        3  10 

      Change in estimate

        322  33 

      Utilizations

        (100) (27)
            

      Balance, end of period

       $952 $295 
            

      Table of Contents

              The activity in the repurchase reserve for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 was as follows:

       
       Nine months ended
      September 30,
       
      In millions of dollars 2010 2009 

      Balance, beginning of period

       $482 $75 

      Additions for new sales

        12  29 

      Change in estimate

        669  280 

      Utilizations

        (211) (89)
            

      Balance, end of period

       $952 $295 
            

              Citi does not believe a meaningful range of reasonably possible loss related to its repurchase reserve can be determined.

              Projected future repurchases are calculated, in part, based on the level of unresolved claims at quarter-end as well as trends in claims being made by investors. For GSEs, the response to the repurchase claim is required within 90 days of the claim receipt. If Citi did not respond within 90 days, the claim would then be discussed between Citi and the GSE. For private investors, the time period for responding is governed by the individual sale agreement. If the specified timeframe is exceeded, the investor may choose to initiate legal action.

              As would be expected, as the trend in claims and inventory increases, Citi's reserve for repurchases typically increases. Included in Citi's current reserve estimate is an assumption that repurchase claims will remain at elevated levels for the foreseeable future, although the actual number of claims may differ and is subject to uncertainty. Furthermore, approximately half of the repurchase claims in Citi's recent experience have been successfully appealed and have resulted in no loss to Citi.

              The representation and warranty claims by claimant for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 were as follows:

       
       Three months ended September 30, 
       
       2010 2009 
      Dollars in millions Number of
      Claims
       Original
      Principal
      Balance
       Number of
      Claims
       Original
      Principal
      Balance
       

      GSEs

        1,887 $408  1,514 $325 

      Private Investors

        103  24  109  18 

      Mortgage insurers(1)

        64  14  156  30 
                

      Total

        2,054 $446  1,779 $373 
                

      (1)
      Represents the insurer's rejection of a claim for loss reimbursement that has yet to be resolved. To the extent that mortgage insurance will not cover the claim on a loan, Citi may have to make the GSE or private investor whole.

              The representation and warranty claims for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 were as follows:

       
       Nine months ended September 30, 
       
       2010 2009 
      Dollars in millions Number of
      Claims
       Original
      Principal
      Balance
       Number of
      Claims
       Original
      Principal
      Balance
       

      GSEs

        6,720 $1,444  4,478 $933 

      Private Investors

        259  58  358  58 

      Mortgage insurers

        190  41  242  49 
                

      Total

        7,169 $1,543  5,078 $1,040 
                

              The number of unresolved claims by type of claimant as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, were as follows:

       
       September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
      Dollars in millions Number of
      Claims
       Original
      Principal
      Balance
       Number of
      Claims
       Original
      Principal
      Balance
       

      GSEs

        4,349 $954  2,600 $572 

      Private Investors

        196  32  311  40 

      Mortgage insurers

        128  27  204  42 
                

      Total

        4,673 $1,013  3,115 $654 
                

      Table of Contents

      Securities and Banking-Sponsored Private Label Residential Mortgage Securitizations—Representations and Warranties

              Over the years,S&B has been a sponsor of private-label mortgage-backed securitizations. Mortgage securitizations sponsored by Citi'sS&B business represent a much smaller portion of Citi's mortgage business than Citi's consumer business discussed above.

              During the period 2005 through 2008,S&B sponsored approximately $65 billion in private-label mortgage-backed securitization transactions, of which approximately $29 billion remained outstanding at September 30, 2010. These outstanding transactions are backed by loan collateral composed of approximately $7.8 billion prime, $6.2 billion Alt-A and $14.8 billion subprime residential mortgage loans. Citi estimates that actual cumulative losses to date incurred by the issuing trusts on these transactions have been approximately $6.3 billion.

              The mortgages included in these securitizations were purchased from parties outside ofS&B, and fewer than 3% of the mortgages currently outstanding were originated by Citi. In addition, fewer than 10% of the currently outstanding mortgage loans underlying these securitization transactions are serviced by Citi. The loans serviced by Citi are included in the $504 billion of residential mortgage loans referenced under "Consumer Mortgage Representations and Warranties" above. (Citi acts as master servicer for certain of the transactions.)

              In connection with such transactions, representations and warranties (representations) relating to the mortgage loans included in each trust issuing the securities were made either by (1) Citi, or (2) in a relatively small number of cases, third-party sellers (Selling Entities, which were also often the originator of the loans). These representations were generally made or assigned to the issuing trust.

              The representations in these securitization transactions generally related to, among other things, the following:

        the absence of fraud on the part of the mortgage loan borrower, the seller or any appraiser, broker or other party involved in the origination of the mortgage loan (which was sometimes wholly or partially limited to the knowledge of the representation provider);

        whether the mortgage property was occupied by the borrower as his or her principal residence;

        the mortgage loan's compliance with applicable federal, state and local laws;

        whether the mortgage loan was originated in conformity with the originator's underwriting guidelines; and

        the detailed data concerning the mortgage loans that was included on the mortgage loan schedule. 

      The specific representations relating to the mortgage loans in each securitization may vary, however, depending on various factors such as the Selling Entity, rating agency requirements and whether the mortgage loans were considered prime, Alt-A or subprime in credit quality.

              In the event of a breach of its representations, Citi may be required either to repurchase the mortgage loans with the identified defects (generally at unpaid principal balance plus accrued interest) or indemnify the investors for their losses.

              For securitizations in which Citi made representations, these representations typically were similar to those provided to Citi by the Selling Entities, with the exception of certain limited representations required by rating agencies. These latter representations overlapped in some cases with the representations described above.

              In cases where Citi made representations and also received those representations from the Selling Entity for that loan, if Citi is the subject of a claim based on breach of those representations in respect of that loan, it may have a contractual right to pursue a similar (back-to-back) claim against the Selling Entity. If only the Selling Entity made representations, then only the Selling Entity should be responsible for a claim based on breach of these representations in respect of that loan. (This discussion only relates to contractual claims based on breaches of representations.)

              However, in some cases where Citi made representations and received similar representations from Selling Entities, including a majority of such cases involving subprime and Alt-A collateral, Citi believes that those Selling Entities appear to be in bankruptcy, liquidation or financial distress. In those cases, in the event that claims for breaches of representations were to be made against Citi, the Selling Entities' financial condition may effectively preclude Citi from obtaining back-to-back recoveries against them.

              To date,S&B has received only a very small number of claims based on breaches of representations relating to the mortgage loans in these securitization transactions. Citi continues to monitor this claim activity relating to itsS&B mortgage securitizations closely.

              In addition to sponsoring residential mortgage securitization transactions as described above,S&B engages in other residential mortgage-related activities, including underwriting of residential mortgage-backed securities.S&B participated in the underwriting of theseS&B-sponsored securitizations, as well as underwritings of other residential mortgage-backed securities sponsored and issued by third parties. For additional information on these activities, see "Legal Proceedings" below.


      Table of Contents


      CORPORATE CREDIT PORTFOLIO

              The following table presents credit data for the Company'sCitigroup's corporate loans and unfunded lending commitments at September 30, 2009:2010. The ratings scale is based on Citi's internal risk ratings, which generally correspond to the ratings as defined by S&P and Moody's.



       At September 30, 2009 
       At September 30, 2010 
      Corporate Loans(1)(in millions of dollars) Recorded Investment
      in Loans(2)
       % of Total(3) Unfunded
      Lending Commitments
       % of Total(3) 
      Corporate loans(1)
      in millions of dollars
      Corporate loans(1)
      in millions of dollars
       Recorded investment
      in loans(2)
       % of total(3) Unfunded
      lending commitments
       % of total(3) 

      Investment grade(4)

      Investment grade(4)

       $96,689 57%$275,556 88%

      Investment grade(4)

       $123,384 70%$237,959 85%

      Non-investment grade(4)

      Non-investment grade(4)

       

      Non-investment grade(4)

       

      Noncriticized

       21,010 12 14,268 5 

      Noncriticized

       22,956 13 22,168 8 

      Criticized performing(5)

       36,803 22 20,384 6 

      Criticized performing(5)

       19,513 11 15,993 6 
       

      Commercial real estate (CRE)

       6,170 4 1,786 0  

      Commercial real estate (CRE)

       5,295 3 1,684 1 
       

      Commercial & Industrial

       30,633 18 18,598 6  

      Commercial and industrial and other

       14,218 8 14,309 5 

      Criticized non-performing(5)

       14,776 9 3,246 1 

      Non-accrual (criticized)(5)

       9,947 6 2,278 1 
       

      Commercial real estate (CRE)

       3,783 3 913 0  

      CRE

       2,138 1 903  
       

      Commercial & Industrial

       10,993 6 2,333 1  

      Commercial and industrial and other

       7,809 5 1,375 1 
                         

      Total non-investment grade

      Total non-investment grade

       $72,589 43%$37,898 12%

      Total non-investment grade

       $52,416 30%$40,439 15%

      Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis(6)(4)

      Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis(6)(4)

       14,565   2,275   

      Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis(6)(4)

       13,784   2,166   

      Loans at fair value

      Loans at fair value

       1,475      

      Loans at fair value

       2,755      
                         

      Total Corporate Loans

       $185,318   $315,754   

      Total corporate loans

      Total corporate loans

       $192,339 100%$280,564 100%

      Unearned income

      Unearned income

       (4,598)      

      Unearned income

       (1,132)      
                         

      Corporate Loans, net of unearned income

       $180,720   $315,754   

      Corporate loans, net of unearned income

      Corporate loans, net of unearned income

       $191,207   $280,564   
                         

      (1)
      Includes $575$791 million of TDRs for which concessions, such as the reduction of interest rates or the deferral of interest or principal payments, have been granted as a result of deterioration in the borrowers' financial condition. Each of the borrowers is current under the restructured terms.

      (2)
      Recorded investment in a loan includes accrued interest, net deferred loan fees and costs, unamortized premium or discount, less any direct write-downs.

      (3)
      Percentages disclosed above exclude Private Banking loans managed on a delinquency basis and loans at fair value.

      (4)
      Held-for-investment loans accounted for on an amortized cost basis.

      (5)
      Criticized exposures correspondscorrespond to the Special"Special Mention, Substandard" "Substandard" and Doubtful"Doubtful" asset categories defined by banking regulatory authorities.

      (6)
      Approximately $0.2 billion are 90+DPD.

      Table of Contents

              The following tables represent the corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking), before consideration of collateral, by maturity at September 30, 2009.2010. The corporate portfolio is broken out by direct outstandings whichthat include drawn loans, overdrafts, interbank placements, bankers' acceptances, certain investment securities and leases and unfunded commitments whichthat include unused commitments to lend, letters of credit and financial guarantees.


       At September 30, 2009  At September 30, 2010 
      In billions of dollars Due
      within
      1 year
       Greater
      than 1 year
      but within
      5 years
       Greater
      than
      5 years
       Total
      exposure
        Due
      within
      1 year
       Greater
      than 1 year
      but within
      5 years
       Greater
      than
      5 years
       Total
      exposure
       

      Direct outstandings

       $158 $88 $8 $254  $197 $41 $9 $247 

      Unfunded lending commitments

       182 126 9 317  172 93 10 275 
                        

      Total

       $340 $214 $17 $571  $369 $134 $19 $522 
                        

       


       At December 31, 2008  At December 31, 2009 
      In billions of dollars Due
      within
      1 year
       Greater
      than 1 year
      but within
      5 years
       Greater
      than
      5 years
       Total
      exposure
        Due
      within
      1 year
       Greater
      than 1 year
      but within
      5 years
       Greater
      than
      5 years
       Total
      exposure
       

      Direct outstandings

       $161 $100 $9 $270  $213 $66 $7 $286 

      Unfunded lending commitments

       206 141 12 359  182 120 10 312 
                        

      Total

       $367 $241 $21 $629  $395 $186 $17 $598 
                        

      Portfolio Mix

              The corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking) is diverse across counterparty, industry and geography. The following table shows direct outstandings and unfunded commitments by region:


       September 30,
      2009
       December 31,
      2008
        September 30,
      2010
       December 31,
      2009
       

      North America

       46% 48% 46% 51%

      EMEA

       32 31  31 27 

      Latin America

       9 8  7 9 

      Asia

       13 13  16 13 
                

      Total

       100% 100% 100% 100%
                

              The maintenance of accurate and consistent risk ratings across the corporate credit portfolio facilitates the comparison of credit exposure across all lines of business, geographic regions and products.

              Obligor risk ratings reflect an estimated probability of default for an obligor and are derived primarily through the use of statistical models (which are validated periodically), external rating agencies (under defined circumstances) or approved scoring methodologies. Facility risk ratings are assigned, using the obligor risk rating, and then factors that affect the loss-givenloss given default of the facility, such as support or collateral, are taken into account. With regard to climate change risk, factors evaluated include consideration of the business impact, impact of regulatory requirements or lack thereof, and impact of physical effects on obligors and their assets.

              These factors may adversely affect the ability of some obligors to perform and thus increase the risk of lending activities to these obligors. Citigroup also has incorporated climate risk assessment criteria for certain obligors, as necessary. Internal obligor ratings equivalent to BBB and above are considered investment grade. Ratings below the equivalent of the BBB category are considered non-investment grade.

              As described in Citi's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, Citi seeks performance on guarantee arrangements in the normal course of business. Seeking performance entails obtaining satisfactory cooperation from the guarantor or borrower to achieve Citi's strategy in the specific situation. This regular cooperation is indicative of pursuit and successful enforcement of the guarantee: the exposure is reduced without the expense and burden of pursuing a legal remedy. Enforcing a guarantee via legal action against the guarantor is not the primary means of resolving a troubled loan situation and rarely occurs.

      The following table presents the corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking) by facility risk rating at September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, as a percentage of the total portfolio:


       Direct outstandings and
      unfunded commitments
        Direct outstandings and
      unfunded commitments
       

       September 30,
      2009
       December 31,
      2008
        September 30,
      2010
       December 31,
      2009
       

      AAA/AA/A

       54% 57% 55% 58%

      BBB

       25 24  25 24 

      BB/B

       13 13  13 11 

      CCC or below

       8 6  6 7 

      Unrated

          1  
                

      Total

       100% 100% 100% 100%
                

              The corporate credit portfolio (excluding Private Banking) is diversified by industry, with a concentration only in the financial sector, including banks, other financial institutions, insurance companies, investment banks, and government and central banks. The following table shows the allocation of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments to industries as a percentage of the total corporate portfolio:


       Direct outstandings and
      unfunded commitments
        Direct outstandings and
      unfunded commitments
       

       September 30,
      2009
       December 31,
      2008
        September 30,
      2010
       December 31,
      2009
       

      Government and central banks

       14% 12% 12% 12%

      Banks

       9 9 

      Investment banks

       6 7  7 5 

      Banks

       10 7 

      Petroleum

       5 4 

      Other financial institutions

       5 5  4 12 

      Utilities

       5 5  4 4 

      Insurance

       4 4  4 4 

      Petroleum

       5 4 

      Agriculture and food preparation

       5 4  4 4 

      Telephone and cable

       3 3  3 3 

      Real estate

       3 3 

      Industrial machinery and equipment

       3 3  2 2 

      Global information technology

       2 3  2 2 

      Chemicals

       3 3  2 2 

      Other industries(1)

       35 40  39 34 
                

      Total

       100% 100% 100% 100%
                

      (1)
      Includes all other industries, none of which exceeds 2% of total outstandings.

      Table of Contents

      Credit Risk Mitigation

              As part of its overall risk management activities, the CompanyCitigroup uses credit derivatives and other risk mitigants to hedge portions of the credit risk in its portfolio, in addition to outright asset sales. The purpose of these transactions is to transferreduce Citigroup's credit risk to third parties.risk. The results of the mark-to-market and any realized gains or losses on credit derivatives are reflected in thePrincipal transactions line on the Consolidated Statement of Income.current period's income.

              At September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008, $66.32009, $56.8 billion and $95.5$59.6 billion, respectively, of credit risk exposure were economically hedged. Citigroup's expected loss model used in the calculation of its loan loss reserve does not include the favorable impact of credit derivatives and other risk mitigants. In addition, the reported amounts of direct outstandings and unfunded commitments in this report do not reflect the impact of these hedging transactions. At September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying credit exposure with the following risk rating distribution, respectively:

      Rating of Hedged Exposure


       September 30,
      2009
       December 31,
      2008
        September 30,
      2010
       December 31,
      2009
       

      AAA/AA/A

       45% 54% 52% 45%

      BBB

       37 32  32 37 

      BB/B

       11 9  12 11 

      CCC or below

       7 5  4 7 
                

      Total

       100% 100% 100% 100%
                

              At September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the credit protection was economically hedging underlying credit exposure with the following industry distribution, respectively:distribution:

      Industry of Hedged Exposure


       September 30,
      2009
       December 31,
      2008
        September 30,
      2010
       December 31,
      2009
       

      Utilities

       9% 10%

      Government

       11% 0%

      Other financial institutions

       6 4 

      Telephone and cable

       8 9  7 9 

      Agriculture and food preparation

       7 7  7 8 

      Chemicals

       6 8 

      Petroleum

       6 7  6 6 

      Utilities

       6 9 

      Industrial machinery and equipment

       6 6  3 6 

      Autos

       6 6 

      Retail

       4 4 

      Insurance

       4 5  4 4 

      Chemicals

       7 5 

      Retail

       4 5 

      Other financial institutions

       4 4 

      Autos

       5 4 

      Pharmaceuticals

       5 4  3 5 

      Natural gas distribution

       4 4  4 3 

      Metals

       5 4 

      Global information technology

       3 4  2 3 

      Metals

       4 3 

      Other industries(1)

       24 23  20 21 
                

      Total

       100% 100% 100% 100%
                

      (1)
      Includes all other industries, none of which is greater than 2% of the total hedged amount.

      Table of Contents


      U.S. Subprime-Related Direct Exposure in Citi Holdings—Special Asset PoolMARKET RISK

              Market risk encompasses liquidity risk and price risk, both of which arise in the normal course of business of a global financial intermediary. Liquidity risk is the risk that an entity may be unable to meet a financial commitment to a customer, creditor, or investor when due. Liquidity risk is discussed in "Capital Resources and Liquidity" above. Price risk is the earnings risk from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, and in their implied volatilities. Price risk arises in non-trading portfolios, as well as in trading portfolios.

      Interest Rate Exposure (IRE) for Non-Trading Portfolios

              The exposures in the following table represent the approximate annualized risk to net interest revenue (NIR), assuming an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100 basis points change, as well as a more gradual 100 basis points (25 basis points per quarter) parallel change in rates compared with the market forward interest rates in selected currencies.

       
       September 30, 2010 June 30, 2010 September 30, 2009 
      In millions of dollars Increase Decrease Increase Decrease Increase Decrease 

      U.S. dollar

                       

      Instantaneous change

       $(302)NM $(264)NM $(727) NM 

      Gradual change

       $(189)NM $(179)NM $(427) NM 
                    

      Mexican peso

                       

      Instantaneous change

       $88 $(88) $60 $(60) $25 $(25)

      Gradual change

       $50 $(50) $33 $(33) $11 $(11)
                    

      Euro

                       

      Instantaneous change

       $38 NM $13 NM $47  NM 

      Gradual change

       $20 NM $3 NM $10  NM 
                    

      Japanese yen

                       

      Instantaneous change

       $85 NM $133 NM $211  NM 

      Gradual change

       $58 NM $89 NM $120  NM 
                    

      Pound sterling

                       

      Instantaneous change

       $24 NM $16 NM $(9) NM 

      Gradual change

       $14 NM $8 NM $(10) NM 
                    

      NM    Not meaningful. A 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would imply negative rates for the yield curve.

              The changes in the U.S. dollar IRE from the previous quarter reflect changes in the customer-related asset and liability mix, asset sales, the expected impact of market rates on customer behavior and purchases in the liquidity portfolio. The changes from the prior-year quarter primarily reflected modeling of mortgages and deposits based on lower rates, pricing changes due to the CARD Act, debt issuance and swapping activities, offset by repositioning of the liquidity portfolio.

              Certain trading-oriented businesses within Citi have accrual-accounted positions. The U.S. dollar IRE associated with these businesses is ($106) million for a 100 basis point instantaneous increase in interest rates.

              The following table shows the risk to NIR from six different changes in the implied-forward rates. Each scenario assumes that the rate change will occur on a gradual basis every three months over the course of one year.

       
       Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 6 

      Overnight rate change (bps)

        0  100  200  (200) (100) 0 

      10-year rate change (bps)

        (100) 0  100  (100) 0  100 
                    

      Impact to net interest revenue
      (in millions of dollars)

       
      $

      (102

      )

      $

      (195

      )

      $

      (496

      )
       
      NM
        
      NM
       
      $

      102
       
                    

      NM    Not meaningful. A 100 basis point or more decrease in the overnight rate would imply negative rates for the yield curve.


      Table of Contents

      Value at Risk for Trading Portfolios

              For Citigroup's major trading centers, the aggregate pretax value at risk (VAR) in the trading portfolios was $226 million, $214 million, $172 million, and $273 million at September 30, 2010, June 30, 2010, March 31, 2010, and September 30, 2009, respectively. Daily Citigroup trading VAR averaged $213 million and ranged from $192 million to $237 million during the third quarter of 2010.

              The following table summarizes Citigroup's U.S. subprime-related direct exposures in Citi HoldingsVAR for Citigroup trading portfolios at September 30, 2009 and2010, June 30, 2009:2010, and September 30, 2009, including the total VAR, the specific risk-only component of VAR, the isolated general market factor VARs, along with the quarterly averages.

      In billions of dollars
       June 30, 2009
      exposures
       Third
      Quarter
      2009
      write-ups
      (downs)(1)
       Third Quarter
      2009
      Other(2)
       September 30, 2009
      exposures
       

      Direct ABS CDO super senior exposures:

                   
       

      Gross ABS CDO super senior exposures (A)

       $14.5       $15.1 
       

      Hedged exposures (B)

        6.3        6.3 

      Net ABS CDO super senior exposures:

                   
       

      ABCP/CDO(3)

        7.3 $1.6 $(1.3) 7.7 
       

      High grade

        0.7  0.1    0.8 
       

      Mezzanine

        0.2  0.2(4) (0.1) 0.3 
                

      Total net ABS CDO super senior exposures (A-B=C)

       $8.3 $2.0 $(1.5)(4)$8.8 
                

      Lending and structuring exposures (D)

       $1.4 $ $(0.1)$1.2 
                

      Total net exposures (C+D)(5)(6)

       $9.6 $2.0 $(1.7)$10.0 
                

      Credit adjustment on hedged counterparty exposures (E)(7)

          $(0.1)      
                

      Total net write-ups (downs) (C+D+E)

          $1.9       
                
      In millions of dollars September 30,
      2010
       Third
      Quarter
      2010
      Average
       June 30,
      2010(2)
       Second
      Quarter
      2010
      Average
       September 30,
      2009
       Third
      Quarter
      2009
      Average
       

      Interest rate

       $274 $252 $244 $224 $240 $237 

      Foreign exchange

        68  72  57  57  98  90 

      Equity

        33  53  71  64  51  62 

      Commodity

        30  26  24  21  41  38 

      Diversification benefit

        (179) (190) (182) (178) (157) (146)
                    

      Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk

       $226 $213 $214 $188 $273 $281 
                    

      Specific risk-only component(1)

       $29 $19 $17 $16 $12 $17 
                    

      Total—General market factors only

       $197 $194 $197 $172 $261 $264 
                    

      Note: Table may not foot or cross-foot due to roundings.

      (1)
      Includes net profitsThe specific risk-only component represents the level of equity and losses associated with liquidations.debt issuer-specific risk embedded in VAR.

      (2)
      Reflects sales, transfersOn April 30, 2010, Citigroup concluded its implementation of exponentially weighted market factor volatilities for interest rate and repayment or liquidationsFX positions to the VAR calculation. This methodology uses the higher of principal.short- and long-term annualized volatilities. This enhancement resulted in a 31% increase inS&B VAR, and a 24% increase in Citigroup consolidated VAR, reported at June 30, 2010.

              The table below provides the range of market factor VARs, inclusive of specific risk, across the quarters ended:

       
       September 30,
      2010
       June 30,
      2010
       September 30,
      2009
       
      In millions of dollars Low High Low High Low High 

      Interest rate

       $231 $285 $198 $270 $218 $260 

      Foreign exchange

        55  90  36  94  55  110 

      Equity

        32  86  48  89  51  95 

      Commodity

        22  33  15  27  32  45 
                    

              The following table provides the VAR forS&B for the third quarter of 2010 and the second quarter of 2010:

      In millions of dollars September 30,
      2010
       June 30,
      2010
       

      Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk

       $155 $176 
            

      Average—during quarter

       $161 $139 

      High—during quarter

        187  180 

      Low—during quarter

        141  100 
            

      Table of Contents

      INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS

      Average Rates—Interest Revenue, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Margin

      GRAPHIC

      In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
      2010
       2nd Qtr.
      2010
       3rd Qtr.
      2009(1)
       Change
      3Q10 vs. 3Q09
       

      Interest revenue(2)

       $19,371 $20,418 $18,678  4%

      Interest expense(3)

        6,125  6,379  6,680  (8)%
                

      Net interest revenue(2)(3)

       $13,246 $14,039 $11,998  10%
                

      Interest revenue—average rate

        4.48% 4.57% 4.59% (11) bps

      Interest expense—average rate

        1.60% 1.60% 1.83% (23) bps

      Net interest margin

        3.07% 3.15% 2.95% 12bps
                

      Interest-rate benchmarks:

                   

      Federal Funds rate—end of period

        0.00-0.25% 0.00-0.25% 0.00-0.25%  

      Federal Funds rate—average rate

        0.00-0.25% 0.00-0.25% 0.00-0.25%  
                

      Two-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate

        0.54% 0.87% 1.03% (49) bps

      10-year U.S. Treasury note—average rate

        2.78% 3.49% 3.52% (74) bps
                

      10-year vs. two-year spread

        224bps 262bps 249bps   
                

      (1)
      Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation and to exclude discontinued operations.

      (2)
      Excludes taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $149 million, $149 million, and $387 million for the third quarter of 2010, the second quarter of 2010, and the third quarter of 2009, respectively.

      (3)
      ConsistsExcludes expenses associated with hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interest in consolidated VIEs. These obligations are classified asLong-term debt and accounted for at fair value with changes recorded inPrincipal transactions. In addition, the funding provided by Treasury to SLC is excluded from this line for the third quarter of older-vintage, high-grade ABS CDOs.

      2010.
      (4)
      A

              Significant portion of Citi's business activities are based upon gathering deposits and borrowing money and then lending or investing those funds, including market-making activities in tradable securities. Net interest margin (NIM) is calculated by dividing annualized gross interest revenue less gross interest expense by average interest earning assets.

              NIM decreased by 8 basis points during the underlying securities was purchasedthird quarter of 2010 due to the continued run-off and sales of higher-yielding assets in liquidations of CDOs and reported asTrading account assets. As of September 30, 2009, $303 million relating to deals liquidated was held in the trading books.

      (5)
      Composed of net CDO super-senior exposures and gross lending and structuring exposures.

      (6)
      These $10.0 billion in net direct exposures include the $8.0 billion of assets reflected in the table entitled "Assets within Special Asset Pool" under "Citi Holdings—Special Asset Pool" above.

      (7)
      Adjustment related to counterparty credit risk.

      Citi Holdings, had approximately $10.0 billioninvesting the proceeds in net U.S. subprime-related direct exposureslower-yielding securities with a shorter duration and deposit-taking that resulted in the Special Asset Pool at September 30, 2009. The exposure consistedpurchases of (a) approximately $8.8 billion of net exposures in the super senior tranches (i.e., the most senior tranches) of CDOs, which are collateralized by asset-backed securities, derivatives on asset-backed securities, or both (ABS CDOs), and (b) approximately $1.2 billion of exposures in its lending and structuring business.

              The Special Asset Pool also has trading positions, both long and short, in U.S. subprime RMBS and related products, including ABS CDOs, which are not included in the figures above. The exposure from these positionsAFS securities. NIM is actively managed and hedged, although the effectiveness of the hedging products used may vary with material changes in market conditions.

      Direct ABS CDO Super Senior Exposures

              The net $8.8 billion in ABS CDO super senior exposures as of September 30, 2009 is collateralized primarily by subprime RMBS, derivatives on RMBS, or both.

              Citi Holdings' CDO super senior subprime direct exposures are Level 3 assets. The valuation of the high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO positions uses trader prices based on the underlying assets of each high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO. Unlike the ABCP positions, the high-grade and mezzanine positions are now largely hedged through the ABX and bond short positions, which are trader priced. This results in closer symmetry in the way these long and short positions are valued by the business. Citi Holdings intendsexpected to use trader marks to value this portion of the portfolio going forward so long as it remains largely hedged.

              The valuation of the ABCP positions is subject to valuation based on significant unobservable inputs. Fair value of these exposures is based on estimates of future cash flows from the mortgage loans underlying the assets of the ABS CDOs. To determine the performance of the underlying mortgage loan portfolios, the Company estimates the prepayments, defaults and loss severities based on a number of macroeconomic factors. The model is calibrated using available mortgage loan information including historical loan performance. An appropriate discount rate is then applied to the cash flows generated for each ABCP tranche, in order to estimate its fair valueremain under current market conditions.

              The valuation as of September 30, 2009 assumes a cumulative decline in U.S. housing prices from peak to trough of 30.5%. This rate assumes declines of 10% in 2009 and flat for 2010, respectively,pressure throughout the remainder of the 30.5% decline having already occurred before the end of 2008.

              The primary drivers that currently impact the model valuations are the discount rates used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows and projected mortgage loan performance. Each 10 basis point change in the discount rate used generally results in an approximate $26 million change in the fair value of the Company's direct ABCP exposures as of September 30, 2009.

              Estimates of the fair value of the CDO super senior exposures depend on market conditions and are subject to further change over time. For a further discussion of the valuation methodology and assumptions used to value direct ABS CDO super senior exposures to U.S. Subprime Mortgages, see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Fair Value Measurement."2010.


      Table of Contents

      LendingAVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)

       
       Average Volume Interest Revenue % Average Rate 
      In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
      2010
       2nd Qtr.
      2010
       3rd Qtr.
      2009
       3rd Qtr.
      2010
       2nd Qtr.
      2010
       3rd Qtr.
      2009
       3rd Qtr.
      2010
       2nd Qtr.
      2010
       3rd Qtr.
      2009
       

      Assets

                                  

      Deposits with banks(5)

       $160,541 $168,330 $190,269 $318 $291 $313  0.79% 0.69% 0.65%
                          

      Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $155,053 $186,283 $140,756 $441 $452 $476  1.13% 0.97% 1.34%

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        91,891  83,055  70,790  366  329  252  1.58  1.59  1.41 
                          

      Total

       $246,944 $269,338 $211,546 $807 $781 $728  1.30% 1.16% 1.37%
                          

      Trading account assets(7)(8)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $122,799 $130,475 $138,781 $1,035 $1,019 $1,668  3.34% 3.13% 4.77%

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        150,503  149,628  129,135  991  992  986  2.61  2.66  3.03 
                          

      Total

       $273,302 $280,103 $267,916 $2,026 $2,011 $2,654  2.94% 2.88% 3.93%
                          

      Investments(1)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

                                  
       

      Taxable

       $181,513 $157,621 $122,608 $1,102 $1,301 $1,568  2.41% 3.31% 5.07%
       

      Exempt from U.S. income tax

        14,780  15,305  18,666  185  197  226  4.97  5.16  4.80 

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        131,275  138,477  121,950  1,324  1,488  1,489  4.00  4.31  4.84 
                          

      Total

       $327,568 $311,403 $263,224 $2,611 $2,986 $3,283  3.16% 3.85% 4.95%
                          

      Loans (net of unearned income)(9)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $396,518 $460,147 $370,470 $8,245 $9,153 $5,939  8.25% 7.98% 6.36%

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        253,016  249,353  268,211  5,087  5,074  5,662  7.98  8.16  8.38 
                          

      Total

       $649,534 $709,500 $638,681 $13,332 $14,227 $11,601  8.14% 8.04% 7.21%
                          

      Other interest-earning Assets

       $56,542 $51,519 $43,869 $277 $122 $99  1.94% 0.95% 0.90%
                          

      Total interest-earning Assets

       $1,714,431 $1,790,193 $1,615,505 $19,371 $20,418 $18,678  4.48% 4.57% 4.59%
                             

      Non-interest-earning assets(7)

        219,977  226,902  253,316                   
                                

      Total Assets from discontinued operations

        44,671    21,418                   
                                

      Total assets

       $1,979,079 $2,017,095 $1,890,239                   
                          

      (1)
      Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $149 million, $149 million, and Structuring Exposures$387 million for the third quarter of 2010, the second quarter of 2010, and the third quarter of 2009, respectively.

      (2)
      Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

      (3)
      Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

      (4)
      Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

      (5)
      Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary correction in certain countries.

      (6)
      Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41 and Interest revenue excludes the impact of (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41.

      (7)
      The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

      (8)
      Interest expense onTrading account liabilities ofICG is reported as a reduction ofInterest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest onTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

      (9)
      Includes cash-basis loans.

      Table of Contents

      AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)

       
       Average Volume Interest Expense % Average Rate 
      In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
      2010
       2nd Qtr.
      2010
       3rd Qtr.
      2009
       3rd Qtr.
      2010
       2nd Qtr.
      2010
       3rd Qtr.
      2009
       3rd Qtr.
      2010
       2nd Qtr.
      2010
       3rd Qtr.
      2009
       

      Liabilities

                                  

      Deposits

                                  

      In U. S. offices

                                  
       

      Savings deposits(5)

       $196,724 $186,070 $173,999 $444 $461 $613  0.90% 0.99% 1.40%
       

      Other time deposits

        44,103  48,171  62,256  98  100  224  0.88  0.83  1.43 

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        487,128  475,562  459,142  1,588  1,475  1,461  1.29  1.24  1.26 
                          

      Total

       $727,955 $709,803 $695,397 $2,130 $2,036 $2,298  1.16% 1.15% 1.31%
                          

      Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $115,961 $137,610 $131,641 $188 $237 $248  0.64% 0.69% 0.75%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        89,454  100,759  72,302  483  560  524  2.14  2.23  2.88 
                          

      Total

       $205,415 $238,369 $203,943 $671 $797 $772  1.30% 1.34% 1.50%
                          

      Trading account liabilities(8)(9)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $35,725 $39,709 $21,204 $79 $88 $28  0.88% 0.89% 0.52%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        39,740  43,528  39,431  29  18  15  0.29  0.17  0.15 
                          

      Total

       $75,465 $83,237 $60,635 $108 $106 $43  0.57% 0.51% 0.28%
                          

      Short-term borrowings

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $103,866 $122,260 $108,474 $153 $181 $259  0.58% 0.59% 0.95%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        41,052  33,630  30,985  60  34  91  0.58  0.41  1.17 
                          

      Total

       $144,918 $155,890 $139,459 $213 $215 $350  0.58% 0.55% 1.00%
                          

      Long-term debt(10)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $344,375 $391,524 $318,610 $2,779 $3,011 $2,952  3.20% 3.08% 3.68%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        19,558  23,369  27,447  224  214  265  4.54  3.67  3.83 
                          

      Total

       $363,933 $414,893 $346,057 $3,003 $3,225 $3,217  3.27% 3.12% 3.69%
                          

      Total interest-bearing liabilities

       $1,517,686 $1,602,192 $1,445,491 $6,125 $6,379 $6,680  1.60% 1.60% 1.83%
                             

      Demand deposits in U.S. offices

        15,046  14,986  34,592                   

      Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8)

        240,974  243,892  250,768                   

      Total liabilities from discontinued operations

        44,385    14,189                   
                                

      Total liabilities

       $1,818,091 $1,861,070 $1,745,040                   
                                

      Citigroup equity(11)

       $158,416 $153,798 $143,547                   
                                

      Noncontrolling Interest

       $2,572 $2,227 $1,652                   
                                

      Total Equity

       $160,988 $156,025 $145,199                   
                                

      Total Liabilities and Equity

       $1,979,079 $2,017,095 $1,890,239                   
                          

      Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

        1,006,417 $1,087,675 $947,414  7,475 $8,136 $5,694  2.95% 3.00% 2.38%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        708,014  702,518  668,091  5,771  5,903  6,304  3.23  3.37  3.74 
                          

      Total

        1,714,431 $1,790,193 $1,615,505  13,246 $14,039 $11,998  3.07% 3.15% 2.95%
                          

      (1)
      Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) $149 million, $149 million, and $387 million for the third quarter of 2010, the second quarter of 2010, and the third quarter of 2009, respectively.

      (2)
      Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

      (3)
      Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

      (4)
      Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

      (5)
      Savings deposits consist of Insured Money Market Rate accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The $1.2 billioninterest expense includes FDIC deposit fees and charges of subprime-related exposures includes approximately $0.8 billion$226 million, $242 million and $285 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010, June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively.

      (6)
      Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

      (7)
      Average volumes of actively managed subprime loans purchasedsecurities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41and Interest expense excludes the impact of (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41.

      (8)
      The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

      (9)
      Interest expense onTrading account liabilities ofICG is reported as a reduction ofInterest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest onTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

      (10)
      Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified asLong-term debt as these obligations are accounted for resale or securitization at a discount to par during 2007 and approximately $0.4 billion of financing transactions with customers secured by subprime collateral, and are carried at fair value.value with changes recorded inPrincipal Transactions. Includes stockholders' equity of discontinued operations.

      (11)
      Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset. In addition the funding provided by Treasury to SLC is excluded from this line for the third quarter of 2010.

      Table of Contents

      AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)

       
       Average Volume Interest Revenue % Average Rate 
      In millions of dollars Nine Months
      2010
       Nine Months
      2009
       Nine Months
      2010
       Nine Months
      2009
       Nine Months
      2010
       Nine Months
      2009
       

      Assets

                         

      Deposits with banks(5)

       $165,083 $176,014 $899 $1,126  0.73% 0.86%
                    

      Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $167,123 $133,427 $1,364 $1,541  1.09% 1.54%

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        84,333  61,534  976  866  1.55  1.88 
                    

      Total

       $251,456 $194,961 $2,340 $2,407  1.24% 1.65%
                    

      Trading account assets(7)(8)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $128,350 $140,210 $3,123 $5,437  3.25% 5.18%

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        150,845  119,351  2,786  3,089  2.47  3.46 
                    

      Total

       $279,195 $259,561 $5,909 $8,526  2.83% 4.39%
                    

      Investments(1)

                         

      In U.S. offices

                         
       

      Taxable

       $163,331 $122,563 $3,792 $4,722  3.10% 5.15%
       

      Exempt from U.S. income tax

        15,218  16,511  555  591  4.88  4.79 

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        138,215  115,930  4,359  4,581  4.22  5.28 
                    

      Total

       $316,764 $255,004 $8,706 $9,894  3.67% 5.19%
                    

      Loans (net of unearned income)(9)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $445,349 $386,429 $26,909 $19,024  8.08% 6.58%

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        252,286  269,017  15,323  17,361  8.12  8.63 
                    

      Total

       $697,635 $655,446 $42,232 $36,385  8.09% 7.42%
                    

      Other interest-earning assets

       $51,318 $50,972 $555 $594  1.45% 1.56%
                    

      Total interest-earning assets

       $1,761,451 $1,591,958 $60,641 $58,932  4.60% 4.95%
                      

      Non-interest-earning assets(7)

        226,741  277,243             

      Total assets from discontinued operations

        14,890  20,183             
                        

      Total assets

       $2,003,082 $1,889,384             
                    

      (1)
      Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $434 million and $566 million for the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.

      (2)
      Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

      (3)
      Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

      (4)
      Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

      (5)
      Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary correction in certain countries.

      (6)
      Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net pursuant to (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41 and interest revenue excludes the impact of (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41.

      (7)
      The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest bearing liabilities.

      (8)
      Interest expense onTrading account liabilities ofICG is reported as a reduction ofInterest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest onTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

      (9)
      Includes cash-basis loans.

      Table of Contents

      AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)

       
       Average Volume Interest Expense % Average Rate 
      In millions of dollars Nine Months
      2010
       Nine Months
      2009
       Nine Months
      2010
       Nine Months
      2009
       Nine Months
      2010
       Nine Months
      2009
       

      Liabilities

                         

      Deposits

                         

      In U. S. offices

                         
       

      Savings deposits(5)

       $187,020 $170,715 $1,363 $2,245  0.97% 1.76%
       

      Other time deposits

        48,888  60,469  341  918  0.93  2.03 

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        481,231  432,057  4,542  4,823  1.26  1.49 
                    

      Total

       $717,139 $663,241 $6,246 $7,986  1.16% 1.61%
                    

      Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $124,755 $139,232 $604 $852  0.65% 0.82%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        89,887  71,611  1,518  1,955  2.26  3.65 
                    

      Total

       $214,642 $210,893 $2,122 $2,807  1.32% 1.78%
                    

      Trading account liabilities(8)(9)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $36,025 $20,503 $211 $171  0.78% 1.12%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        43,391  35,728  66  49  0.20  0.18 
                    

      Total

       $79,416 $56,231 $277 $220  0.47% 0.52%
                    

      Short-term borrowings

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $126,304 $131,116 $538 $835  0.57% 0.85%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        34,114  33,833  166  293  0.65  1.16 
                   ��

      Total

       $160,418 $164,949 $704 $1,128  0.59% 0.91%
                    

      Long-term debt(10)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $377,671 $308,201 $8,795 $8,199  3.11% 3.56%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        22,961  30,274  651  839  3.79  3.71 
                    

      Total

       $400,632 $338,475 $9,446 $9,038  3.15% 3.57%
                    

      Total interest-bearing liabilities

       $1,572,247 $1,433,789 $18,795 $21,179  1.60% 1.97%
                      

      Demand deposits in U.S. offices

        15,569  23,186             

      Other non-interest bearing liabilities(8)

        244,077  272,809             

      Total liabilities from discontinued operations

        14,795  12,670             
                        

      Total liabilities

       $1,846,688 $1,742,454             
                        

      Total Citigroup equity(11)

       $154,069 $145,097             

      Noncontrolling interest

       $2,325 $1,833             
                        

      Total Equity

       $156,394 $146,930             
                        

      Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

       $2,003,082 $1,889,384             
                    

      Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)

                         

      In U.S. offices

        1,058,255 $954,220  24,271 $18,789  3.07% 2.63%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        703,196  637,738  17,575  18,964  3.34  3.98 
                    

      Total

        1,761,451 $1,591,958  41,846 $37,753  3.18% 3.17%
                    

      (1)
      Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $434 million and $566 million for the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, respectively.

      (2)
      Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

      (3)
      Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

      (4)
      Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

      (5)
      Savings deposits consist of Insured Money Market Rate accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The interest expense includes FDIC deposit fees and charges of $691 million and $1,254 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. Additionally, the second quarter of 2009 includes the one-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million.

      (6)
      Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

      (7)
      Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net pursuant to (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41 and interest expense excludes the impact of (ASC 210-20-45) FIN 41.

      (8)
      The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest bearing liabilities.

      (9)
      Interest expense onTrading account liabilities ofICG is reported as a reduction ofInterest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest onTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

      (10)
      Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified asLong-term debt as these obligations are accounted for at fair value with changes recorded inPrincipal Transactions. In addition, the funding provided by Treasury to SLC is excluded from this line.

      (11)
      Includes stockholders' equity of discontinued operations.

      (12)
      Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.

      Table of Contents


      Exposure to Commercial Real EstateANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

              ICG

       
       3rd Qtr. 2010 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2010 3rd Qtr. 2010 vs. 3rd Qtr. 2009 
       
       Increase (Decrease)
      Due to Change in:
        
       Increase (Decrease)
      Due to Change in:
        
       
      In millions of dollars Average
      Volume
       Average
      Rate
       Net
      Change
       Average
      Volume
       Average
      Rate
       Net
      Change
       

      Deposits with banks(4)

        (14) 41  27  (53) 58  5 
                    

      Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

                         

      In U.S. offices

        (82) 71  (11) 45  (80) (35)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        35  2  37  81  33  114 
                    

      Total

        (47) 73  26  126  (47) 79 
                    

      Trading account assets(5)

                         

      In U.S. offices

        (62) 78  16  (176) (457) (633)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        6  (7) (1) 151  (146) 5 
                    

      Total

        (56) 71  15  (25) (603) (628)
                    

      Investments(1)

                         

      In U.S. offices

        185  (396) (211) 548  (1,055) (507)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (75) (89) (164) 108  (273) (165)
                    

      Total

        110  (485) (375) 656  (1,328) (672)
                    

      Loans (net of unearned income)(6)

                         

      In U.S. offices

        (1,309) 401  (908) 441  1,865  2,306 

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        74  (61) 13  (312) (263) (575)
                    

      Total

        (1,235) 340  (895) 129  1,602  1,731 
                    

      Other interest-earning assets

        13  142  155  35  143  178 
                    

      Total interest revenue

        (1,229) 182  (1,047) 868  (175) 693 
                    

      (1)
      The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

      (2)
      Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the Special Asset Pool, through their business activitiespercentage relationship of changes in volume and as capital markets participants, incur exposures that are directly or indirectly tiedchanges in rate to the commercial real estate market. These exposures are represented primarily by the following three categories:

      total net change.

      (3)
      Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

      (4)
      Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

      (5)
              (1)   Interest expense onAssets held at fair valueTrading account liabilities include approximately $5.7 billion, of which approximately $4.6 billion are securities, loansICG is reported as a reduction ofInterest revenue. Interest revenue and other items linked to CRE that are carried at fair value as trading account assets, and of which approximately $1.0 billion are securities backed by CRE carried at fair value as available-for-sale (AFS) investments. Changes in fair value for these trading account assetsInterest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in current earnings, while AFS investments are reported in OCI with other-than-temporary impairments reported in current earnings.

              The majority of these exposures are classified as Level 3 in the fair-value hierarchy. Weakening activity in the trading markets for some of these instruments resulted in reduced liquidity, thereby decreasing the observable inputs for such valuations, and could have an adverse impactinterest on how these instruments are valued in the future if such conditions persist.

              (2)   Assets held at amortized costTrading account assets include approximately $1.8 billion of securities classified as HTM and $22.8 billion of loans and commitments. The HTM securities were classified as such during the fourth quarter of 2008 and were previously classified as either trading or AFS. They are accounted for at amortized cost, subject to other-than-temporary impairment. Loans and commitments are recorded at amortized cost, less loan loss reserves. The impact from changes in credit is reflected in the calculation of the allowance for loan losses and in net credit losses.

              (3)   Equity and other investmentsTrading account liabilities include approximately $4.9 billion of equity and other investments such as limited partner fund investments which are accounted for under the equity method, which recognizes gains or losses based on the investor's share of the net income of the investee., respectively.

      (6)
      Includes cash-basis loans.

      Table of Contents


      Direct Exposure to MonolinesANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

              Citi Holdings has exposure, via the Special Asset Pool, to various monoline bond insurers (Monolines), listed in the table below, from hedges on certain investments and from trading positions. The hedges are composed of credit default swaps and other hedge instruments. Citi Holdings recorded an additional $61 million in downward CVA related to exposure to Monolines during the third quarter of 2009, bringing the total CVA balance to $5.3 billion.

              The following table summarizes the market value of Citi Holdings' direct exposures to and the corresponding notional amounts of transactions with the various Monolines as well as the aggregate credit valuation adjustment associated with these exposures as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009.

       
       September 30, 2009 June 30, 2009 
      In millions of dollars
       Fair-value
      exposure
       Notional
      amount of
      transactions
       Fair-value exposure Notional
      amount of
      transactions
       

      Direct subprime ABS CDO super senior—Ambac

       $4,495 $5,295 $4,525 $5,328 
                

      Trading assets—non-subprime:

                   

      MBIA

       $1,898 $3,871 $2,123 $3,868 

      FSA

        74  847  128  1,108 

      Assured

        80  458  126  466 

      Radian

        8  150  19  150 

      Ambac

          407    407 
                

      Subtotal trading assets—non-subprime

       $2,061 $5,733 $2,396 $5,999 
                

      Total gross fair-value direct exposure

       $6,556    $6,921    

      Credit valuation adjustment

        (5,274)    (5,213)   
                

      Total net fair-value direct exposure

       $1,282    $1,708    
                
       
       3rd Qtr. 2010 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2010 3rd Qtr. 2010 vs. 3rd Qtr. 2009 
       
       Increase (Decrease)
      Due to Change in:
        
       Increase (Decrease)
      Due to Change in:
        
       
      In millions of dollars Average
      Volume
       Average
      Rate
       Net
      Change
       Average
      Volume
       Average
      Rate
       Net
      Change
       

      Deposits

                         

      In U.S. offices

        15  (34) (19) 16  (311) (295)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        36  77  113  91  36  127 
                    

      Total

        51  43  94  107  (275) (168)
                    

      Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

                         

      In U.S. offices

        (36) (13) (49) (28) (32) (60)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (61) (16) (77) 109  (150) (41)
                    

      Total

        (97) (29) (126) 81  (182) (101)
                    

      Trading account liabilities(5)

                         

      In U.S. offices

        (9)   (9) 26  25  51 

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (2) 13  11    14  14 
                    

      Total

        (11) 13  2  26  39  65 
                    

      Short-term borrowings

                         

      In U.S. offices

        (27) (1) (28) (11) (95) (106)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        9  17  26  24  (55) (31)
                    

      Total

        (18) 16  (2) 13  (150) (137)
                    

      Long-term debt

                         

      In U.S. offices

        (375) 143  (232) 227  (400) (173)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (38) 48  10  (85) 44  (41)
                    

      Total

        (413) 191  (222) 142  (356) (214)
                    

      Total interest expense

        (488) 234  (254) 369  (924) (555)
                    

      Net interest revenue

        (741) (52) (793) 499  749  1,248 
                    


      (1)
      The fair-value exposure,taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

      (2)
      Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net of payablechange.

      (3)
      Detailed average volume, interest revenue and receivable positions, represents the market valueinterest expense exclude discontinued operations.

      (4)
      Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

      (5)
      Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of the contract as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, excluding the CVA. The notional amount of the transactions, including both long and short positions,ICG is usedreported as a reference value to calculate payments. The CVA is a downward adjustment to the fair-value exposure to a counterparty to reflect the counterparty's creditworthinessreduction ofInterest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in respect of the obligations in question.

              Credit valuation adjustments are basedinterest on credit spreadsTrading account assets and on estimates of the terms and timing of the payment obligations of the Monolines. Timing in turn depends on estimates of the performance of the transactions to which the Company's exposure relates, estimates of whether and when liquidation of such transactions may occur and other factors, each considered in the context of the terms of the Monolines' obligations.

              As of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, Citi Holdings had $6.3 billion in notional amount of hedges against its direct subprime ABS CDO super senior positions. Of those amounts, $5.3 billion was purchased from Monolines and is included in the notional amount of transactions in the table above.

              With respect to Citi Holdings' trading assets, there were $2.1 billion and $2.4 billion of fair-value exposure to Monolines as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009,Trading account liabilities, respectively. Trading assets include trading positions, both long and short, in U.S. subprime RMBS and related products, including ABS CDOs.

              The notional amount of transactions related to the remaining non-subprime trading assets as of September 30, 2009 was $5.7 billion. Of the $5.7 billion, $5.0 billion was in the form of credit default swaps and total return swaps with a fair value exposure of $2.1 billion. The remaining notional amount comprised $697 million primarily in interest-rate swaps with a corresponding fair value exposure of $9 million net payable.

              The notional amount of transactions related to the remaining non-subprime trading assets at June 30, 2009 was $6.0 billion with a corresponding fair value exposure of $2.4 billion. Of the $6.0 billion, $5.0 billion was in the form of credit default swaps and total return swaps with a fair value of $2.4 billion. The remaining notional amount comprised $955 million primarily in interest-rate swaps with a corresponding fair value exposure of $2.1 million net payable.

              The Company has purchased mortgage insurance from various monoline mortgage insurers on first mortgage loans. The notional amount of this insurance protection was approximately $243 million and $316 million as of September 30, 2009 and June 30, 2009, respectively, with nominal pending claims against this notional amount.

              In addition, Citigroup has indirect exposure to Monolines in various other parts of its businesses. Indirect exposure includes circumstances in which the Company is not a contractual counterparty to the Monolines, but instead owns securities which may benefit from embedded credit enhancements provided by a Monoline. For example, corporate or municipal bonds in the trading business may be insured by the Monolines. The table and discussion above do not reflect this type of indirect exposure to the Monolines.


      Table of Contents


      Highly Leveraged Financing Transactions
      ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE, INTEREST EXPENSE, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

              Highly leveraged financing commitments are agreements that provide funding to a borrower with higher levels of debt (measured by the ratio of debt capital to equity capital of the borrower) than

       
       Nine Months 2010 vs. Nine Months 2009 
       
       Increase (Decrease)
      Due to Change in:
        
       
      In millions of dollars Average
      Volume
       Average
      Rate
       Net
      Change(2)
       

      Deposits at interest with banks(4)

        (67) (160) (227)
              

      Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

                

      In U.S. offices

        336  (513) (177)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        282  (172) 110 
              

      Total

        618  (685) (67)
              

      Trading account assets(5)

                

      In U.S. offices

        (428) (1,886) (2,314)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        703  (1,006) (303)
              

      Total

        275  (2,892) (2,617)
              

      Investments(1)

                

      In U.S. offices

        1,268  (2,234) (966)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        794  (1,016) (222)
              

      Total

        2,062  (3,250) (1,188)
              

      Loans (net of unearned income)(6)

                

      In U.S. offices

        3,165  4,720  7,885 

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (1,047) (991) (2,038)
              

      Total

        2,118  3,729  5,847 
              

      Other interest-earning assets

        4  (43) (39)
              

      Total interest revenue

        5,010  (3,301) 1,709 
              

      Deposits

                

      In U.S. offices

        63  (1,522) (1,459)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        513  (794) (281)
              

      Total

        576  (2,316) (1,740)
              

      Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

                

      In U.S. offices

        (83) (165) (248)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        423  (860) (437)
              

      Total

        340  (1,025) (685)
              

      Trading account liabilities(5)

                

      In U.S. offices

        102  (62) 40 

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        11  6  17 
              

      Total

        113  (56) 57 
              

      Short-term borrowings

                

      In U.S. offices

        (30) (267) (297)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        2  (129) (127)
              

      Total

        (28) (396) (424)
              

      Long-term debt

                

      In U.S. offices

        1,700  (1,104) 596 

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (207) 19  (188)
              

      Total

        1,493  (1,085) 408 
              

      Total interest expense

        2,494  (4,878) (2,384)
              

      Net interest revenue

        2,516  1,577  4,093 
              

      (1)
      The taxable equivalent adjustment is generally the case for other companies. In recent years through mid-2008, highly leveraged financing had been commonly employed in corporate acquisitions, management buy-outs and similar transactions.

              In these financings, debt service (that is, principal and interest payments) absorbs a significant portion of the cash flows generated by the borrower's business. Consequently, the risk that the borrower may not be able to meet its debt obligations is greater. Due to this risk, the interest rates and fees charged for this type of financing are generally higher than for other types of financing.

              Prior to funding, highly leveraged financing commitments are assessed for impairment and losses are recorded when they are probable and reasonably estimable. For the portion of loan commitments that relates to loans that will be held for investment, loss estimates are made based on the borrower's abilityU.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

      (2)
      Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to repay the facility accordingtotal net change.

      (3)
      Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

      (4)
      Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

      (5)
      Interest expense onTrading account liabilities ofICG is reported as a reduction ofInterest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported in interest onTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

      (6)
      Includes cash-basis loans.

      Table of Contents

      CROSS BORDER RISK AND SOVEREIGN EXPOSURE

      Cross Border Risk

              Total exposure is defined as cross border claims outstanding plus net foreign office claims on local residents and cross border claims outstanding from derivative products.

              Net foreign office claims on local residents equals total foreign office claims on local residents less foreign office liabilities. If the difference is negative then the exposure is zero. For example, if Country A branch has deposits from Country A residents of 150 and the Country A branch invests in Country A government securities of 100 then the net foreign exposure would be zero, calculated as follows:100 total local country assets less 150 local country liabilities equals (50), negative exposure defaults to its contractual terms. For the portion of loan commitments that relates to loans that will be held-for-sale, loss estimates are made in reference to current conditionszero.

              The countries included in the resale market (both interest rate riskCross Border Risk table below are those countries whose total exposure exceeds 0.75% of total Citigroup assets. Total exposure includes bank and credit riskprivate exposure in addition to public (government) exposure.

       
       Cross-Border Claims on Third Parties September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
      In billions of U.S. dollars Banks Public Private Total Trading and
      Short-Term
      Claims
       Investments
      in and
      Funding of
      Local
      Franchises
       Total
      Cross-Border
      Outstanding
       Commitments Total
      Cross-Border
      Outstandings
       Commitments 

      France

       $12.6 $12.0 $10.2 $34.8 $26.0 $2.5 $37.3 $51.2 $33.0 $68.5 

      Germany

        15.9  7.4  4.8  28.1  23.1  6.4  34.5  42.0  30.2  53.1 

      India

        2.1  0.5  7.0  9.6  7.0  19.2  28.8  2.2  24.9  1.8 

      United Kingdom

        12.9  1.8  9.1  23.8  21.1    23.8  96.4  17.1  138.5 

      Italy

        2.2  12.6  1.4  16.2  15.2  1.0  17.2  19.2  21.7  21.2 

      Cayman Islands

        0.2    16.9  17.1  16.1    17.1  3.6  18.0  6.1 

      South Korea

        1.7  1.6  3.0  6.3  6.1  10.7  17.0  16.6  17.4  14.4 

      Brazil

        1.7  0.9  6.3  8.9  6.7  7.5  16.4  16.9  10.3  13.9 

      Netherlands

        5.8  2.7  6.8  15.3  9.9    15.3  48.8  20.3  65.5 

      Mexico

          1.8  3.4  5.2  2.8  9.6  14.8  26.3  12.8  21.2 
                            

      Sovereign Exposure

              Total exposure is defined as of loans net of hedges, unfunded lending commitments, available for sale securities, trading securities, and securities purchased under agreements to resell, in which the direct obligor is a foreign government. Trading account assets consist of foreign government securities and other mark-to-market gains on derivative and other trading account positions.

              Foreign office liabilities are not considered in the estimate). Loan origination, commitment, underwriting and other feescalculation of sovereign exposure as they are netted against any recorded losses.for cross border exposure (the Country A example above).

              Citigroup generally manages the risk associated with highly leveraged financings it has entered into by seeking to sell a majority of its exposures to the market prior to or shortly after funding. In certain cases, all or a portion of a highly leveraged financing to be retained is hedged with credit derivatives or other hedging instruments. Thus, when a highly leveraged financing is funded, Citigroup records the resulting loan as follows:General summary:

        Cross border risk nets foreign office liabilities against foreign office claims in the portion that Citigroup will seek to sell is recorded as a loan held-for-saletotal exposure calculation. Sovereign Exposure includes gross exposure, and does not consider foreign office liabilities inOther assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, and measured at the lower of cost or market (LOCOM); andtotal exposure calculation.

        Unfunded commitments are not considered part of the portion that will be retained is recorded as a loan held-for-investment intotal exposure calculation for Cross Border Risk.Loans

        and measured at amortized cost less a reserve for loan losses.
        Sovereign Exposure includes the impact of hedges, where Cross Border Risk does not.

              DueAt September 30, 2010, Citi's total sovereign exposure approximated $285 billion and consisted of approximately 94% investment grade countries and approximately 6% non-investment grade countries.

      Venezuelan Operations

              In 2003, the Venezuelan government enacted currency restrictions that have restricted Citigroup's ability to obtain U.S. dollars in Venezuela at the dislocation ofofficial foreign currency rate. In May 2010, the credit marketsgovernment enacted new laws that have closed the parallel foreign exchange market and established a new foreign exchange market. Citigroup does not have access to U.S. dollars in this new market. Citigroup uses the reduced market interest in higher-risk/higher-yield instruments sinceofficial rate to re-measure the latter half of 2007, liquidityforeign currency transactions in the market for highly leveraged financings has been limited. This has resulted in the Company's recording pretax write-downs on funded and unfunded highly leveraged finance exposuresfinancial statements of $24 million in the third quarter of 2009, bringing the cumulative write-downs for the first nine months of 2009 to $508 million.

              Citigroup's exposures to highly leveraged financing commitments totaled $6.2 billion atits Venezuelan operations, which have U.S. dollar functional currencies, into U.S. dollars. At September 30, 2009 ($5.9 billion funded and $0.3 billion2010, Citigroup had net monetary assets in unfunded commitments), reflecting a decrease of $2.3 billion from June 30, 2009.

              In 2008, the Company completed the transferits Venezuelan operations denominated in bolivars of approximately $12.0 billion of loans to third parties, of which $8.5 billion relates to highly leveraged loan commitments. In these transactions, the third parties purchased subordinate interests backed by the transferred loans. These subordinate interests absorb first loss on the transferred loans and provide the third parties with control of the loans. The Company retained senior debt securities backed by the transferred loans. These transactions were accounted for as sales of the transferred loans. The loans were removed from the balance sheet and the retained securities are classified as AFS securities on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

              In addition, the Company purchased protection on the senior debt securities from the third-party subordinate interest holders via total return swaps (TRS). The counterparty credit risk in the TRS is protected through margin agreements that provide for both initial margin and additional margin at specified triggers. Due to the initial cash margin received, the existing margin requirements on the TRS, and the substantive subordinate investments made by third parties, the Company believes that the transactions largely mitigate the Company's risk related to the transferred loans.

              The Company's sole remaining exposure to the transferred loans are the senior debt securities, which have an amortized cost basis of $6.8 billion and fair value of $6.9 billion at September 30, 2009, and the payables under the TRS, which have a fair value of $0.1 billion at September 30, 2009. The change in the value of the retained senior debt securities that are classified as AFS securities are recorded in AOCI as they are deemed temporary. The offsetting change in the TRS are recorded as cash flow hedges within AOCI. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.$155 million.


      Table of Contents


      DERIVATIVES

              See Note 1615 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion and disclosures related to the Company's DerivativeCitigroup's derivative activities. The following discussions relate to the Fair Valuation AdjustmentAdjustments for Derivatives and Credit Derivatives activities.

      Fair Valuation Adjustments for Derivatives

              The fair value adjustments applied by the Company to its derivative carrying values consist of the following items:

        Liquidity adjustments are applied to items in Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy (see Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) to ensure that the fair value reflects the price at which the entire position could be liquidated. The liquidity reserve is based on the bid/offer spread for an instrument, adjusted to take into account the size of the position.

        CVA are applied to over-the-counter derivative instruments, in which the base valuation generally discounts expected cash flows using LIBOR interest rate curves. Because not all counterparties have the same credit risk as that implied by the relevant LIBOR curve, a CVA is necessary to incorporate the market view of both counterparty credit risk and the Company's own credit risk in the valuation.

              The Company's CVA methodology comprises two steps. First, the exposure profile for each counterparty is determined using the terms of all individual derivative positions and a Monte Carlo simulation or other quantitative analysis to generate a series of expected cash flows at future points in time. The calculation of this exposure profile considers the effect of credit risk mitigants, including pledged cash or other collateral and any legal right of offset that exists with a counterparty through arrangements such as netting agreements. Individual derivative contracts that are subject to an enforceable master netting agreement with a counterparty are aggregated for this purpose, since it is those aggregate net cash flows that are subject to nonperformance risk. This process identifies specific, point in time future cash flows that are subject to nonperformance risk, rather than using the current recognized net asset or liability as a basis to measure the CVA.

              Second, market-based views of default probabilities derived from observed credit spreads in the credit default swap market, are applied to the expected future cash flows determined in step one. Own-credit CVA is determined using Citi-specific CDS spreads for the relevant tenor. Generally, counterparty CVA is determined using CDS spread indices for each credit rating and tenor. For certain identified facilities where individual analysis is practicable (for example, exposures to monoline counterparties) counterparty-specific CDS spreads are used.

              The CVA adjustment is designed to incorporate a market view of the credit risk inherent in the derivative portfolio. However, most derivative instruments are negotiated bilateral contracts and are not commonly transferred to third parties. Derivative instruments are normally settled contractually, or if terminated early, are terminated at a value negotiated bilaterally between the counterparties. Therefore, the CVA (both counterparty and own-credit) may not be realized upon a settlement or termination in the normal course of business.

              In addition, all or a portion of the CVA may be reversed or otherwise adjusted in future periods in the event of changes in the credit risk of Citi or its counterparties, or changes in the credit mitigants (collateral and netting agreements) associated with the derivative instruments. Historically, Citigroup's credit spreads have moved in tandem with general counterparty credit spreads, thus providing offsetting CVAs affecting revenue. However, in the first quarter of 2009, Citigroup's credit spreads widened and counterparty credit spreads generally narrowed, each of which positively affected revenues. Conversely, in the second and third quarters of 2009, Citigroup's credit spreads narrowed and negatively affected revenues.

              The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses) related to changes in CVAs on derivative instruments for the quarters ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively:

       
       Credit valuation
      adjustment gain (loss)
       
      In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

      Non-monoline counterparties

       $855 $(851)

      Citigroup (own)

        (1,534) 1,951 
            

      Net non-monoline CVA

       $(679)$1,100 

      Monoline counterparties

        (61) (920)
            

      Total CVA—derivative instruments

       $(740)$180 
            

              The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses) related to changes in CVAs on derivative instruments for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively:

       
       Credit valuation
      adjustment gain (loss)
       
      In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

      Non-monoline counterparties

       $5,387 $(2,236)

      Citigroup (own)

        (1,891) 3,165 
            

      Net non-monoline CVA

       $3,496 $929 

      Monoline counterparties

        (995) (4,839)
            

      Total CVA—derivative instruments

       $2,501 $(3,910)
            

              The table below summarizes the CVA applied to the fair value of derivative instruments as of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008, respectively.2009.


       Credit valuation adjustment
      Contra liability (contra asset)
        Credit valuation adjustment
      Contra-liability (contra-asset)
       
      In millions of dollars September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008  September 30,
      2010
       December 31,
      2009
       

      Non-monoline counterparties

       $(2,878)$(8,266) $(3,642)$(3,010)

      Citigroup (own)

       1,754 3,611  1,497 1,401 
                

      Net non-monoline CVA

       $(1,124)$(4,655) $(2,145)$(1,609)

      Monoline counterparties

       (5,274) (4,279) (1,576) (5,580)
                

      Total CVA—derivative instruments

       $(6,398)$(8,934) $(3,721)$(7,189)
                

              The table below summarizes pretax gains (losses) related to changes in credit valuation adjustments on derivative instruments, net of hedges:

       
       Credit valuation
      adjustment gain (loss)
       
      In millions of dollars Third Quarter
      2010
       Third Quarter
      2009
       Nine months
      ended Sept 30,
      2010
       Nine months
      ended Sept 30,
      2009
       

      CVA on derivatives, excluding monolines

       $348 $(864)$415 $2,351 

      CVA related to monoline counterparties

        61  (61) 494  (994)
                

      Total CVA—derivative instruments

       $409 $(925)$909 $1,357 
                

              The CVA amounts shown above relate solely to the derivative portfolio, and do not include:

        Own-credit adjustments for non-derivative liabilities measured at fair value under the fair-valuefair value option. See

      Table of Contents

      Note 1716 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.



        The effect of counterparty credit risk embedded in non-derivative instruments. General spread widening has negatively affected the market value of a range of financial instruments. Losses on non-derivative instruments, such as bonds and loans, related to counterparty credit risk are not included in the table above.

      Credit Derivatives

              The CompanyCitigroup makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives, both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account. Through these contracts the CompanyCitigroup either purchases or writes protection on either a single-name or portfolio basis. The CompanyCiti primarily uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate loan portfolio and other cash positions, to take proprietary trading positions, and to facilitate client transactions.

              Credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of pre-definedpredefined events (settlement triggers). These settlement triggers, which are defined by the form of the derivative and the referenced credit, and are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy (or comparable events) of the reference credit and, in a more limited range of transactions, debt restructuring.

              Credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium. In certain transactions on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities, the seller of protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount.


      Table of Contents

              The following tables summarize the key characteristics of the Company'sCiti's credit derivativederivatives portfolio by counterparty and derivative instrumentform as of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008, respectively:2009:

      September 30, 2010:

       
       Fair values Notionals 
      In millions of dollars Receivable Payable Beneficiary Guarantor 

      By industry/counterparty

                   

      Bank

       $44,250 $41,271 $878,776 $824,452 

      Broker-dealer

        16,948  17,057  324,807  321,330 

      Monoline

        2,044    4,400   

      Non-financial

        105  98  1,629�� 1,690 

      Insurance and other financial institutions

        10,068  9,053  172,004  116,398 
                

      Total by industry/counterparty

       $73,415 $67,479 $1,381,616 $1,263,870 
                

      By instrument

                   

      Credit default swaps and options

       $72,910 $65,696 $1,357,410 $1,262,408 

      Total return swaps and other

        505  1,783  24,206  1,462 
                

      Total by instrument

       $73,415 $67,479 $1,381,616 $1,263,870 
                

      By rating:

                   

      Investment grade

       $21,267 $17,113 $604,594 $535,545 

      Non-investment grade(1)

        52,148  50,366  777,022  728,325 
                

      Total by Rating

       $73,415 $67,479 $1,381,616 $1,263,870 
                

      By maturity:

                   

      Within 1 year

       $1,961 $2,229 $161,369 $154,308 

      From 1 to 5 years

        43,744  37,835  962,211  871,926 

      After 5 years

        27,710  27,415  258,036  237,636 
                

      Total by maturity

       $73,415 $67,479 $1,381,616 $1,263,870 
                

      December 31, 2009:

       
       Fair values Notionals 
      In millions of dollars Receivable Payable Beneficiary Guarantor 

      By Industry/Counterparty:

                   

      Bank

       $62,785 $61,679 $914,418 $860,437 

      Broker-dealer

        23,425  22,323  321,199  301,216 

      Monoline

        6,572  1  8,299   

      Non-financial

        181  193  3,405  2,127 

      Insurance and other financial institutions

        19,264  16,379  202,054  151,326 
                

      Total by Industry/Counterparty

       $112,227 $100,575 $1,449,375 $1,315,106 
                

      By Instrument:

                   

      Credit default swaps and options

       $107,770 $99,376 $1,418,691 $1,314,282 

      Total return swaps

        4,457  1,199  30,684  824 
                

      Total by Instrument

       $112,227 $100,575 $1,449,375 $1,315,106 
                

      December 31, 2008(1):


       Fair values Notionals  Fair values Notionals 
      In millions of dollars Receivable Payable Beneficiary Guarantor  Receivable Payable Beneficiary Guarantor 

      By Industry/Counterparty:

       

      By industry/counterparty

       

      Bank

       $128,042 $121,811 $996,248 $943,949  $52,383 $50,778 $872,523 $807,484 

      Broker-dealer

       59,321 56,858 403,501 365,664  23,241 22,932 338,829 340,949 

      Monoline

       6,886 91 9,973 139  5,860  10,018 33 

      Non-financial

       4,874 2,561 5,608 7,540  339 371 1,781 623 

      Insurance and other financial institutions

       29,228 22,388 180,354 125,988  10,969 8,343 109,811 64,964 
                        

      Total by Industry/Counterparty

       $228,351 $203,709 $1,595,684 $1,443,280 

      Total by industry/counterparty

       $92,792 $82,424 $1,332,962 $1,214,053 
                        

      By Instrument:

       

      By instrument

       

      Credit default swaps and options

       $221,159 $203,220 $1,560,222 $1,441,375  $91,625 $81,174 $1,305,724 $1,213,208 

      Total return swaps

       7,192 489 35,462 1,905 

      Total return swaps and other

       1,167 1,250 27,238 845 
                        

      Total by Instrument

       $228,351 $203,709 $1,595,684 $1,443,280 

      Total by instrument

       $92,792 $82,424 $1,332,962 $1,214,053 
                        

      By rating:

       

      Investment grade

       $26,666 $22,469 $656,876 $576,930 

      Non-investment grade(1)

       66,126 59,995 676,086 637,123 
               

      Total by Rating

       $92,792 $82,424 $1,332,962 $1,214,053 
               

      By maturity:

       

      Within 1 year

       $2,167 $2,067 $173,880 $165,056 

      From 1 to 5 years

       54,079 47,350 877,573 806,143 

      After 5 years

       36,546 33,007 281,509 242,854 
               

      Total by maturity

       $92,792 $82,424 $1,332,962 $1,214,053 
               

      (1)
      Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.Also includes not rated credit derivative instruments.

      Table of Contents

              The fair values shown are prior to the application of any netting agreements, cash collateral, and market or credit value adjustments.

              The CompanyCitigroup actively participates in trading a variety of credit derivatives products as both an active two-way market-maker for clients and to manage credit risk. The majority of this activity was transacted with other financial intermediaries, including both banks and broker-dealers. The CompanyCitigroup generally has a mismatch between the total notional amounts of protection purchased and sold and it may hold the reference assets directly, rather than entering into offsetting credit derivative contracts as and when desired. The open risk exposures from credit derivative contracts are largely matched after certain cash positions in reference assets are considered and after notional amounts are adjusted, either to a duration-based equivalent basis or to reflect the level of subordination in tranched structures.

              The CompanyCiti actively monitors its counterparty credit risk in credit derivative contracts. Approximately 87%89% and 85% of the gross receivables as of September 30, 2009 are from counterparties with which the CompanyCiti maintains collateral agreements.agreements as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. A majority of the Company'sCiti's top 15 counterparties (by receivable balance owed to the Company)company) are banks, financial institutions or other dealers. Contracts with these counterparties do not include ratings-based termination events. However, counterparty ratingratings downgrades may have an incremental effect by lowering the threshold at which the CompanyCitigroup may call for additional collateral. A number of the remaining significant counterparties are monolines.


      Table of Contentsmonolines (which have CVA as shown above).


      MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESSINCOME TAXES

              Market risk encompasses liquidity risk and price risk, bothDeferred Tax Assets

              Deferred tax assets (DTAs) are recorded for the future consequences of which ariseevents that have been recognized in the normal coursefinancial statements or tax returns, based upon enacted tax laws and rates. DTAs are recognized subject to management's judgment that realization is more likely than not. For additional information, see "Significant Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates—Income Taxes" in Citi's 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

              As of businessSeptember 30, 2010, Citigroup had recorded net DTAs of approximately $50.8 billion, an increase of $0.9 billion from $49.9 billion at June 30, 2010 and an increase of $4.7 billion from $46.1 billion at December 31, 2009. Excluding the impact of the adoption of SFAS 166/167, the DTAs decreased $0.2 billion during the first nine months of 2010. The adoption of SFAS 166/167 on January 1, 2010 resulted in an increase to the DTAs of approximately $4.9 billion related to the allowance for loan losses recorded upon consolidation of credit card trusts.

              Although realization is not assured, Citi believes that the realization of the recognized net DTAs of $50.8 billion at September 30, 2010 is more likely than not based on expectations as to future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which the DTAs arise and, based on available tax planning strategies as defined in ASC 740,Income Taxes, that could be implemented if necessary to prevent a global financial intermediary. Liquidity riskcarry-forward from expiring.

              Approximately $21.4 billion of Citigroup's DTAs at September 30, 2010 is represented by U.S. federal, foreign, state and local tax return carry-forwards subject to expiration substantially beginning in 2017 and continuing through 2029. Also included in Citi's overall net DTAs of $50.8 billion is approximately $29.4 billion of future tax deductions and credits that arose largely due to timing differences between the recognition of income for GAAP and tax purposes and represent net deductions and credits that have not yet been taken on a tax return. The most significant source of these timing differences is the risk that an entity may be unableloan loss reserve build, which accounts for approximately $17 billion of the net DTAs. In general, Citi would need to meet a financial commitmentrecognize approximately $103 billion of taxable income, primarily in U.S. taxable jurisdictions, during the respective carry-forward periods to a customer, creditor, or investor when due. Liquidity risk is discussed in "Capital Resourcesfully realize its U.S. federal, state and Liquidity" below. Price risk is the earnings risk from changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, equity and commodity prices, and in their implied volatilities. Price risk arises in non-trading portfolios, as well as in trading portfolios.

      Interest Rate Exposure (IRE)local DTAs.

              The exposures inU.S. Federal net operating loss (NOL) carry-forward component of the following table representDTAs was approximately $2.3 billion at September 30, 2010, down from $5.1 billion at December 31, 2009. As Citi continues to generate U.S. federal taxable income, the approximate annualized riskdomestic portion of the NOL carry-forward component of the DTAs will continue to Net Interest Revenue (NIR) assuming an unanticipated parallel instantaneous 100 basis points change, as well as a more gradual 100 basis points (25 basis points per quarter) parallel change in rates as compared withdecrease. Under U.S. tax law, NOL carry-forwards are used against taxable income before foreign tax credits (FTCs) or general business credits (GBCs) are utilized. The FTC component of the market forward interest rates in selected currencies.

       
       September 30, 2009 June 30, 2009 September 30, 2008 
      In millions of dollars Increase Decrease Increase Decrease Increase Decrease 

      U.S. dollar

                         

      Instantaneous change

       $(1,193)$1,427 $(1,767)$1,935 $(1,811)$893 

      Gradual change

       $(563)$526 $(1,005)$936 $(707)$490 
                    

      Mexican peso

                         

      Instantaneous change

       $25 $(25)$(21)$21 $(23)$23 

      Gradual change

       $11 $(11)$(15)$15 $(19)$19 
                    

      Euro

                         

      Instantaneous change

       $52 $(4)$(29)$21 $(52)$52 

      Gradual change

       $12 $(12)$(35)$35 $(41)$41 
                    

      Japanese yen

                         

      Instantaneous change

       $228  NM $215  NM $142  NM 

      Gradual change

       $135  NM $122  NM $72  NM 
                    

      Pound sterling

                         

      Instantaneous change

       $(11)$24 $(11)$11 $16 $(16)

      Gradual change

       $(11)$11 $(14)$14 $13 $(13)
                    

      NM    Not meaningful. A 100 basis point decrease in interest rates would imply negative rates forDTA was approximately $13.9 billion at September 30, 2010, and the Japanese yen yield curve.

              The changes inGBC component of the DTA was approximately $1.5 billion. Moreover, until the U.S. dollar interest rate exposures from June 30, 2009Federal NOL carry-forward is fully utilized, the FTCs and GBCs will likely continue to September 30, 2009 are relatedincrease. Based on Citi's current expectations of future taxable income, Citi expects the U.S. federal NOL carry-forward to customer-related asset and liability mix, term debt issuance,be utilized in 2011. Citi's net DTA will decline as well as Citigroup's view of prevailing interest rates.additional domestic GAAP taxable income is generated.

              Certain risk positions in the non-trading portfolio are economically hedged with offsetting positions in the mark-to-market portfolio, which are reflected in the Value at Risk metrics. If the effect of these hedging transactions were netted against the non-trading portfolio it would reduce Citi's risk from an instantaneous parallel increase in rates from ($1,193) million to ($569) million and decrease Citi's opportunity from an instantaneous parallel decrease in rates from $1,427 million to $803 million.

              The following table shows the risk to NIR from six different changes in the implied forward rates. Each scenario assumes that the rate change will occur on a gradual basis every three months over the course of one year.

       
       Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Scenario 5 Scenario 6 

      Overnight rate change (bp)

          100  200  (200) (100)  

      10-year rate change (bp)

        (100)   100  (100)   100 

      Impact to net interest revenue
      (in millions of dollars)

       
      $

      8
       
      $

      (514

      )

      $

      (1,131

      )

      $

      62
       
      $

      269
       
      $

      (61

      )
                    

      Table of Contents

      Value        The utilization of Citi's DTAs is necessarily subject to Citi's estimates of future taxable income in the jurisdictions in which it operates during the respective carry-forward periods which is in turn subject to overall market and global economic conditions.

              In addition, Citi's ability to utilize its DTAs to offset future taxable income may be significantly limited if Citi experiences an "ownership change," as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"). In general, an ownership change will occur if there is a cumulative change in Citi's ownership by "5% shareholders" (as defined in the Code) that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. A corporation that experiences an ownership change will generally be subject to an annual limitation on its pre-ownership change DTAs equal to the value of the corporation immediately before the ownership change, multiplied by the long-term tax-exempt rate (subject to certain adjustments); provided that the annual limitation would be increased each year to the extent that there is an unused limitation in a prior year. The limitation arising from an ownership change under Section 382 on Citigroup's ability to utilize its DTAs will depend on the value of Citigroup's stock at Riskthe time of the ownership change.

              Under IRS Notice 2010-2, Citigroup will not experience an ownership change within the meaning of Section 382 as a result of the sales of its common stock held by the U.S. Treasury.

              Approximately $14 billion of the net DTAs is included in Citigroup's Tier 1 Capital and Tier 1 Common regulatory capital.

      Other

              For Citigroup's major trading centers,As previously disclosed in Citi's 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Citi's tax provision has historically been reduced because active financing income earned and indefinitely reinvested outside the aggregate pretax valueU.S. is taxed at risk (VAR) inlower local tax rates rather than at the trading portfolios was $273 million, $277 million, $319 million and $237 million at September 30, 2009, June 30, 2009,higher U.S. tax rate. Such reduction has been dependent upon a provision of the U.S. tax law that defers the imposition of U.S. taxes on certain active financial services income until that income is repatriated to the U.S. as a dividend. This "active financing exception" expired for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2008, respectively. Daily Citigroup trading VAR averaged $281 million and ranged from $247 million to $312 million during the third quarter of 2009. The following table summarizes VAR for Citigroup trading portfolios at September 30, 2009, June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008expiration of this exception has moderately increased Citi's 2010 tax provision. To date, the U.S. Congress has not extended the active financing exception. In the event this exception is not extended, the U.S. tax imposed on Citi's active financing income earned outside the U.S. would increase, which would result in Citi's tax expense increasing significantly and, September 30, 2008, including the total VAR, the specific risk only component of VAR, and general market factor VAR's, along with the quarterly averages:

      In million of dollars September 30,
      2009
       Third
      Quarter
      2009
      Average
       June 30,
      2009
       Second
      Quarter
      2009
      Average
       December 31,
      2008
       Fourth
      Quarter
      2008
      Average
       September 30,
      2008
       Third
      Quarter
      2008
      Average
       

      Interest rate

       $240 $237 $226 $217 $320 $272 $240 $265 

      Foreign exchange

        98  90  84  61  118  80  40  43 

      Equity

        51  62  65  94  84  94  106  99 

      Commodity

        41  38  36  38  15  16  20  20 

      Diversification benefit

        (157) (146) (134) (150) (218) (167) (169) (187)
                        

      Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk

       $273 $281 $277 $260 $319 $295 $237 $240 
                        

      Specific risk only component

       $12 $17 $18 $20 $8  25 $20 $14 
                        

      Total—General market factors only

       $261 $264 $259 $240 $311 $270 $217 $226 
                        

              The specific risk only component represents the level of equity and debt issuer-specific risk embedded in VAR. Citigroup's specific risk model conforms to the 4x-multiplier treatment and is subject to extensive annual hypothetical back-testing.

              The table below provides the range of market factor VARs, inclusive of specific risk, across the quarters ended:

       
       September 30,
      2009
       June 30,
      2009
       December 31,
      2008
       September 30,
      2008
       
      In millions of dollars Low High Low High Low High Low High 

      Interest rate

       $218 $260 $193 $240 $227 $328 $239 $292 

      Foreign exchange

        55  110  31  91  43  130  28  71 

      Equity

        51  95  50  153  68  122  80  134 

      Commodity

        32  45  26  50  12  22  12  46 
                        

              The following table provides the VAR for Citicorp's Securities and Banking business for the second and third quarters of 2009:

      In millions of dollars September 30,
      2009
       June 30,
      2009
       

      Total—All market risk factors, including general and specific risk

       $168 $213 
            

      Average—during quarter

        184  186 

      High—during quarter

        247  214 

      Low—during quarter

        148  148 
            

      Table of Contentsaccordingly, adversely impact Citi's future earnings.


      OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROCESSRECLASSIFICATION OF HTM SECURITIES TO AFS

              Operational risk is        In March 2010, the riskFASB issued ASU 2010-11,Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives. The ASU clarifies that certain embedded derivatives, such as those contained in certain securitizations, CDOs and structured notes, should be considered embedded credit derivatives subject to potential bifurcation and separate fair value accounting. The ASU allows any beneficial interest issued by a securitization vehicle to be accounted for under the fair value option at transition on July 1, 2010.

              Citi elected to account for beneficial interests issued by securitization vehicles, with a total fair value of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, systems or human factors, or from external events. It includes$12.0 billion, under the reputationfair value option on July 1, 2010. Beneficial interests previously classified as HTM were reclassified to AFS on June 30, 2010, because as of that reporting date, Citi did not have the intent to hold the beneficial interests until maturity.

              All reclassified debt securities with gross unrealized losses were assessed for other-than-temporary impairment as of June 30, 2010, including an assessment of whether Citi intends to sell the security. For securities that Citi intends to sell, impairment charges of $176 million (pretax) were recorded in earnings in the second quarter of 2010.

              On July 1, 2010, Citi recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings for reclassified beneficial interests, consisting of gross unrealized losses recognized inAccumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) of $420 million and franchise risk associated with business practices or market conductgross unrealized gains recognized in which the Company is involved. Operational risk is inherent in Citigroup's global business activitiesAOCI of $359 million, for a net pretax charge toRetained earnings of $61 million ($41 million after tax).

              See Notes 1 and as with other risk types, is managed through an overall framework designed to balance strong corporate oversight with well-defined independent risk management. This framework includes:

        recognized ownership of the risk by the businesses;

        oversight by independent risk management; and

        independent review by Audit and Risk Review (ARR).

              The goal is to keep operational risk at appropriate levels relative10 to the characteristics of our businesses, the markets in which we operate our capital and liquidity, and the competitive, economic and regulatory environment. Notwithstanding these controls, Citigroup incurs operational losses.

      Framework

              To monitor, mitigate and control operational risk, Citigroup maintains a system of comprehensive policies and has established a consistent, value-added frameworkConsolidated Financial Statements for assessing and communicating operational risk and the overall effectiveness of the internal control environment across Citigroup. An Operational Risk Council has been established to provide oversight for operational risk across Citigroup. The Council's membership includes senior members of the Chief Risk Officer's organization covering multiple dimensions of risk management with representatives of the Business and Regional Chief Risk Officers' organizations and the Business Management Group. The Council's focus is on further advancing operational risk management at Citigroup with focus on proactive identification and mitigation of operational risk and related incidents. The Council works with the business segments and the control functions to help ensure a transparent, consistent and comprehensive framework for managing operational risk globally.

              Each major business segment must implement an operational risk process consistent with the requirementsdetails of this framework. The process for operational risk management includes the following steps:

        identify and assess key operational risks;

        establish key risk indicators;

        produce a comprehensive operational risk report; and

        prioritize and assure adequate resources to actively improve the operational risk environment and mitigate emerging risks.

              The operational risk standards facilitate the effective communication and mitigation of operational risk both within and across businesses. As new products and business activities are developed, processes are designed, modified or sourced through alternative means and operational risks are considered. Information about the businesses' operational risk, historical losses, and the control environment is reported by each major business segment and functional area, and summarized for senior management and the Citigroup Board of Directors.

      Measurement and Basel II

              To support advanced capital modeling and management, the businesses are required to capture relevant operational risk capital information. An enhanced version of the risk capital model for operational risk has been developed and implemented across the major business segments as a step toward readiness for Basel II capital calculations. The risk capital calculation is designed to qualify as an "Advanced Measurement Approach" under Basel II. It uses a combination of internal and external loss data to support statistical modeling of capital requirement estimates, which are then adjusted to reflect qualitative data regarding the operational risk and control environment.

      Information Security and Continuity of Business

              Information security and the protection of confidential and sensitive customer data are a priority of Citigroup. The Company has implemented an Information Security Program that complies with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and other regulatory guidance. The Information Security Program is reviewed and enhanced periodically to address emerging threats to customers' information.

              The Corporate Office of Business Continuity, with the support of senior management, continues to coordinate global preparedness and mitigate business continuity risks by reviewing and testing recovery procedures.reclassification.


      Table of Contents


      COUNTRY AND CROSS-BORDER RISKEXPOSURE TO COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE

              The table below shows all countries where total Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) cross-border outstandings exceed 0.75% of total Citigroup assets:

       
       September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008 
      In Billions of U.S. dollars 
       Cross-Border Claims on Third Parties 
       
       Banks Public Private Total Trading
      and
      Short-Term
      Claims
       Investments
      in and
      Funding of
      Local
      Franchises
       Total
      Cross-Border
      Outstandings
       Commitments Total
      Cross-Border
      Outstandings
       Commitments 

      Germany

       $9.0 $4.9 $7.2 $21.1 $19.4 $6.3 $27.4 $56.6 $29.9 $48.6 

      France

        10.1  5.9  8.9  24.9  21.0  0.1  25.0  75.2  21.4  66.4 

      India

        0.9  0.2  6.9  8.0  5.0  15.0  23.0  1.6  28.0  1.6 

      Netherlands

        6.3  3.3  10.5  20.1  16.2    20.1  73.8  17.7  67.4 

      South Korea

        2.0  0.9  5.1  8.0  7.8  11.2  19.2  14.1  22.0  15.7 

      United Kingdom

        6.3  0.2  9.5  16.0  13.4    16.0  135.5  26.3  128.3 

      Italy

        0.8  8.7  3.0  12.5  10.1  3.1  15.6  21.7  14.7  20.2 

      Cayman Islands

        0.2    14.2  14.4  13.3    14.4  6.8  22.1  8.2 

      Canada

        1.3  0.5  3.5  5.3  3.6  8.0  13.3  7.4  16.1  36.1 
                            

      (1)
      Included in total cross-border claims on third parties.

      (2)
      Commitments (not included in total cross-border outstandings) include legally binding cross-border letters of credit and other commitments and contingencies as defined by the FFIEC. Effective March 31, 2006, the FFIEC revised the definition of commitments to include commitments to local residents to be funded with local currency local liabilities.

      Table of Contents


      INTEREST REVENUE/EXPENSE AND YIELDS

      Average Rates—Interest Revenue, Interest Expense, and Net Interest Margin

      GRAPHIC

      In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
      2009
       2nd Qtr.
      2009(1)
       3rd Qtr.
      2008(1)
       Change
      3Q09 vs. 3Q08
       

      Interest Revenue(2)

       $18,678 $19,671 $26,130  (29)%

      Interest Expense(3)

        6,680  6,842  12,726  (48)
                

      Net Interest Revenue(2)(3)

       $11,998 $12,829 $13,404  (10)%
                

      Interest Revenue—Average Rate

       ��4.59% 4.97% 6.14% (155) bps

      Interest Expense—Average Rate

        1.83% 1.93% 3.23% (140) bps

      Net Interest Margin (NIM)

        2.95% 3.24% 3.15% (20) bps
                

      Interest Rate Benchmarks:

                   

      Federal Funds Rate—End of Period

        0.00-0.25% 0.00-0.25% 2.00% (175+) bps
                

      2 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate

        1.03% 1.02% 2.36% (133) bps

      10 Year U.S. Treasury Note—Average Rate

        3.52% 3.32% 3.86% (34) bps
                
       

      10 Year vs. 2 Year Spread

        249 bps  230 bps  150 bps    
                

      (1)
      Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation and to exclude discontinued operations.

      (2)
      Excludes taxable equivalent adjustment (based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $387 million, $82 million, and $51 million for the third quarter of 2009, the second quarter of 2009, and the third quarter of 2008, respectively.

      (3)
      Excludes expenses associated with hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interest in consolidated VIEs. These obligations are classified asLong-term debtICG and theSAP, through their business activities and as capital markets participants, incur exposures that are accounted fordirectly or indirectly tied to the commercial real estate (CRE) market, andLCL andRCB hold loans that are collateralized by CRE. These exposures are represented primarily by the following three categories:

              (1)   Assets held at fair value with changes recorded inPrincipal transactions.

              A significant portion include approximately $6.7 billion, of the Company's business activitieswhich approximately $4.5 billion are based upon gathering depositssecurities, loans and borrowing money and then lending or investing those funds, including market-making activities in tradable securities. Net interest margin (NIM) is calculated by dividing annualized gross interest revenue less gross interest expense by average interest earning assets.

              During the third quarter of 2009, the yields across both the interest earning assets as well as the interest earning liabilities dropped significantly from the same period in 2008. The lower asset yields more than offset the lower cost of funds, resulting in lower NIM comparedother items linked to the prior-year period.

              Net interest margin decreased by 29 basis points compared to the second quarter of 2009, driven by two principal items. First, the Company experienced a higher cost of borrowings due to debt issuances outside of the government programs (e.g., non-TLGP debt) as well the increased interest paid on the additional trust preferred securities outstanding as a result of the completion of the exchange offers. Second, Citi's business spread compression, generally of two types—narrowing of yields in Citi's asset businesses, due to the continued de-risking of loan portfolios and expansion of loss mitigation efforts, and the natural compression of spreads in the Company's deposit businesses as a result of the continued low interest rate environment.


      Table of Contents


      AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)

       
       Average Volume Interest Revenue % Average Rate 
      In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
      2009
       2nd Qtr.
      2009
       3rd Qtr.
      2008
       3rd Qtr.
      2009
       2nd Qtr.
      2009
       3rd Qtr.
      2008
       3rd Qtr.
      2009
       2nd Qtr.
      2009
       3rd Qtr.
      2008
       

      Assets

                                  

      Deposits with banks(5)

       $190,269 $168,631 $65,667 $313 $377 $792  0.65% 0.90% 4.80%
                          

      Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $140,756 $131,522 $157,355 $476 $515 $1,272  1.34% 1.57% 3.22%

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        70,790  61,382  73,631  252  279  943  1.41  1.82  5.10 
                          

      Total

       $211,546 $192,904 $230,986 $728 $794 $2,215  1.37% 1.65% 3.81%
                          

      Trading account assets(7)(8)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $138,781 $134,334 $210,248 $1,668 $1,785 $2,740  4.77% 5.33% 5.18%

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        129,135  120,468  150,985  986  1,136  1,397  3.03  3.78  3.68 
                          

      Total

       $267,916 $254,802 $361,233 $2,654 $2,921 $4,137  3.93% 4.60% 4.56%
                          

      Investments(1)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

                                  
       

      Taxable

       $122,608 $123,181 $118,950 $1,568 $1,674 $1,185  5.07% 5.45% 3.96%
       

      Exempt from U.S. income tax

        18,666  16,293  13,057  226  247  136  4.80  6.08  4.14 

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        121,950  118,891  92,241  1,489  1,514  1,276  4.84  5.11  5.50 
                          

      Total

       $263,224 $258,365 $224,248 $3,283 $3,435 $2,597  4.95% 5.33% 4.61%
                          

      Loans (net of unearned income)(9)

                                  

      Consumer loans

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $299,069 $306,273 $329,520 $5,346 $5,410 $6,755  7.09% 7.09% 8.16%

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        151,124  153,352  179,660  3,339  3,236  4,709  8.77  8.46  10.43 
                          

      Total consumer loans

       $450,193 $459,625 $509,180 $8,685 $8,646 $11,464  7.65% 7.55% 8.96%
                          

      Corporate loans

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $71,401 $79,074 $73,976 $593 $844 $778  3.30% 4.28% 4.18%

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        117,087  117,242  135,766  2,323  2,439  3,286  7.87  8.34  9.63 
                          

      Total corporate loans

       $188,488 $196,316 $209,742 $2,916 $3,283 $4,064  6.14% 6.71% 7.71%
                          

      Total loans

       $638,681 $655,941 $718,922 $11,601 $11,929 $15,528  7.21% 7.29% 8.59%
                          

      Other interest-earning Assets

       $43,869 $57,416 $91,182 $99 $215 $861  0.90% 1.50% 3.76%
                          

      Total interest-earning Assets

       $1,615,505 $1,588,059 $1,692,238 $18,678 $19,671 $26,130  4.59% 4.97% 6.14%
                             

      Non-interest-earning assets(7)

        253,316  262,840  357,433                   
                          

      Total Assets from discontinued operations

       $21,418 $19,048 $45,337                   
                                

      Total assets

       $1,890,239 $1,869,947 $2,095,008                   
                          

      (1)
      Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $387 million, $82 million, and $51 million for the third quarter of 2009, the second quarter of 2009, and the third quarter of 2008, respectively.

      (2)
      Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

      (3)
      Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averagesCRE that are unavailable.

      (4)
      Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

      (5)
      Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary correction in certain countries.

      (6)
      Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net. However, Interest revenue is reflected gross.

      (7)
      Thecarried at fair value carrying amountsas trading account assets, of derivativewhich approximately $1.2 billion are securities backed by CRE carried at fair value as AFS investments, and foreign exchange contracts$1.0 billion are loans held-for-sale. Changes in fair value for these trading account assets are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

      (8)
      Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of the ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positionscurrent earnings, while AFS investments are reported inTrading account assetsAccumulated other comprehensive income andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

      (9)
      Includes cash-basis loans.

      Table of Contents


      AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)

       
       Average Volume Interest Expense % Average Rate 
      In millions of dollars 3rd Qtr.
      2009
       2nd Qtr.
      2009
       3rd Qtr.
      2008
       3rd Qtr.
      2009
       2nd Qtr.
      2009
       3rd Qtr.
      2008
       3rd Qtr.
      2009
       2nd Qtr.
      2009
       3rd Qtr.
      2008
       

      Liabilities

                                  

      Deposits

                                  

      In U.S. offices

                                  
       

      Savings deposits(5)

       $173,999 $173,168 $161,437 $613 $999 $611  1.40% 2.31% 1.51%
       

      Other time deposits

        62,256  57,869  54,928  224  278  554  1.43  1.93  4.01 

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        459,142  428,188  464,429  1,461  1,563  3,750  1.26  1.46  3.21 
                          

      Total

       $695,397 $659,225 $680,794 $2,298 $2,840 $4,915  1.31% 1.73% 2.87%
                          

      Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $131,641 $133,948 $160,202 $248 $288 $1,185  0.75% 0.86% 2.94%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        72,302  74,346  99,047  524  643  1,536  2.88  3.47  6.17 
                          

      Total

       $203,943 $208,294 $259,249 $772 $931 $2,721  1.50% 1.79% 4.18%
                          

      Trading account liabilities(8)(9)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $21,204 $19,592 $30,251 $28 $50 $251  0.52% 1.02% 3.30%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        39,431  36,652  41,816  15  19  34  0.15  0.21  0.32 
                          

      Total

       $60,635 $56,244 $72,067 $43 $69 $285  0.28% 0.49% 1.57%
                          

      Short-term borrowings

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $108,474 $136,200 $149,398 $259 $209 $729  0.95% 0.62% 1.94%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        30,985  35,299  45,497  91  106  195  1.17  1.20  1.71 
                          

      Total

       $139,459 $171,499 $194,895 $350 $315 $924  1.00% 0.74% 1.89%
                          

      Long-term debt(10)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $318,610 $296,324 $323,788 $2,952 $2,427 $3,460  3.68% 3.29% 4.25%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        27,447  29,318  36,375  265  260  421  3.83  3.56  4.60 
                          

      Total

       $346,057 $325,642 $360,163 $3,217 $2,687 $3,881  3.69% 3.31% 4.29%
                          

      Total interest-bearing liabilities

       $1,445,491 $1,420,904 $1,567,168 $6,680 $6,842 $12,726  1.83% 1.93% 3.23%
                             

      Demand deposits in U.S. offices

        34,592  19,584  7,326                   

      Other non-interest-bearing liabilities(8)

        250,768  267,055  351,379                   

      Total liabilities from discontinued operations

        14,189  12,122  30,467                   
                                

      Total liabilities

       $1,745,040 $1,719,665 $1,956,340                   
                                

      Citigroup equity(11)

       $143,547 $148,448 $131,771                   
                                

      Noncontrolling Interest

        1,652  1,834  6,897                   
                                

      Total Equity

       $145,199 $150,282 $138,668                   
                                

      Total Liabilities and Equity

       $1,890,239 $1,869,947 $2,095,008                   
                          

      Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)

                                  

      In U.S. offices

       $947,414 $944,819 $976,773 $5,694 $6,452  6,424  2.38% 2.74% 2.62%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        668,091  643,240  715,465  6,304  6,377  6,980  3.74  3.98  3.88 
                          

      Total

       $1,615,505 $1,588,059 $1,692,238 $11,998 $12,829 $13,404  2.95% 3.24% 3.15%
                          

      (1)
      Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $387 million, $82 million, and $51 million for the third quarter of 2009, the second quarter of 2009, and the third quarter of 2008, respectively.

      (2)
      Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

      (3)
      Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

      (4)
      Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

      (5)
      Savings deposits consist of Insured Money Market Rate accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The second quarter of 2009 interest expense includes the one-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million.

      (6)
      Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

      (7)
      Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net. However, Interest revenue is reflected gross.

      (8)
      The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts areother-than-temporary impairments reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest-bearing liabilities.

      (9)
      Interest expense oncurrent earnings.Trading account liabilities

              The majority of the ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

      (10)
      Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs thatthese exposures are classified as long-term debt as these obligations are accounted for atLevel 3 in the fair value with changes recordedhierarchy. Weakening activity in Principal Transactions. In addition, the majoritytrading markets for some of these instruments resulted in reduced liquidity, thereby decreasing the funding provided by Corporate Treasury to CitiCapital operations is excluded from this line.

      (11)
      Includes stockholders' equity from discontinued operations.

      (12)
      Includes allocationsobservable inputs for capitalsuch valuations, and funding costs based on the location of the asset.

      Table of Contents

      AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—ASSETS(1)(2)(3)(4)

       
       Average Volume Interest Revenue % Average Rate 
      In millions of dollars Nine Months
      2009
       Nine Months
      2008
       Nine Months
      2009
       Nine Months
      2008
       Nine Months
      2009
       Nine Months
      2008
       

      Assets

                         

      Deposits with banks(5)

       $176,014 $63,190 $1,126 $2,329  0.86% 4.92%

      Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell(6)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $133,427 $172,482 $1,541 $4,344  1.54% 3.36%

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        61,534  76,851  866  3,407  1.88  5.92 
                    

      Total

       $194,961 $249,333 $2,407 $7,751  1.65% 4.15%
                    

      Trading account assets(7)(8)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $140,210 $235,157 $5,437 $9,623  5.18% 5.47%

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        119,351  161,297  3,089  3,939  3.46  3.26 
                    

      Total

       $259,561 $396,454 $8,526 $13,562  4.39% 4.57%
                    

      Investments(1)

                         

      In U.S. offices

                         
       

      Taxable

       $122,563 $111,467 $4,722 $3,469  5.15% 4.16%
       

      Exempt from U.S. income tax

        16,511  13,059  591  433  4.79  4.43 

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        115,930  96,486  4,581  3,930  5.28  5.44 
                    

      Total

       $255,004 $221,012 $9,894 $7,832  5.19% 4.73%
                    

      Loans (net of unearned income)(9)

                         

      Consumer loans

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $309,443 $343,107 $16,807 $20,913  7.26% 8.14%

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        151,272  180,010  10,087  14,129  8.92  10.48 
                    

      Total consumer loans

       $460,715 $523,117 $26,894 $35,042  7.80% 8.95%
                    

      Corporate loans

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $76,986 $75,177 $2,217 $2,529  3.85% 4.49%

      In offices outside the U.S.(5)

        117,745  147,278  7,274  10,312  8.26  9.35 
                    

      Total corporate loans

       $194,731 $222,455 $9,491 $12,841  6.52% 7.71%
                    

      Total loans

       $655,446 $745,572 $36,385 $47,883  7.42% 8.58%
                    

      Other interest-earning assets

       $50,972 $100,709 $594 $3,271  1.56% 4.34%
                    

      Total interest-earning assets

       $1,591,958 $1,776,270 $58,932 $82,628  4.95% 6.21%
                      

      Non-interest-earning assets(7)

        277,243  375,399             

      Total assets from discontinued operations

        20,183  53,742             
                        

      Total assets

       $1,889,384 $2,205,411             
                        

      (1)
      Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $566 million and $164 million for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.

      (2)
      Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

      (3)
      Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

      (4)
      Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

      (5)
      Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary correction in certain countries.

      (6)
      Average volumes of securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell are reported net. However, Interest revenue is reflected gross.

      (7)
      The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest bearing liabilities.

      (8)
      Interest expense onTrading account liabilitiesof the ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assetsandTrading account liabilities, respectively.

      (9)
      Includes cash-basis loans.

      Table of Contents

      AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES—LIABILITIES AND EQUITY, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)(4)

       
       Average Volume Interest Expense % Average Rate 
      In millions of dollars Nine Months
      2009
       Nine Months
      2008
       Nine Months
      2009
       Nine Months
      2008
       Nine Months
      2009
       Nine Months
      2008
       

      Liabilities

                         

      Deposits

                         

      In U.S. offices

                         
       

      Savings deposits(5)

       $170,715 $166,799 $2,245 $2,334  1.76% 1.87%
       

      Other time deposits

        60,469  59,210  918  1,946  2.03  4.39 

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        432,057  486,320  4,823  11,912  1.49  3.27 
                    

      Total

       $663,241 $712,329 $7,986 $16,191  1.61% 3.04%
                    

      Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase(7)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $139,282 $188,653 $852 $4,519  0.82% 3.20%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        71,611  100,437  1,955  5,040  3.65  6.70 
                    

      Total

       $210,893 $289,090 $2,807 $9,559  1.78% 4.42%
                    

      Trading account liabilities(8)(9)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $20,503 $32,576 $171 $934  1.12% 3.83%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        35,728  46,387  49  130  0.18  0.37 
                    

      Total

       $56,231 $78,963 $220 $1,064  0.52% 1.80%
                    

      Short-term borrowings

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $131,116 $156,458 $835 $2,695  0.85% 2.30%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        33,833  54,438  293  538  1.16  1.32 
                    

      Total

       $164,949 $210,896 $1,128 $3,233  0.91% 2.05%
                    

      Long-term debt(10)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $308,201 $312,940 $8,199 $10,745  3.56% 4.59%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        30,274  37,885  839  1,358  3.71  4.79 
                    

      Total

       $338,475 $350,825 $9,038 $12,103  3.57% 4.61%
                    

      Total interest-bearing liabilities

       $1,433,789 $1,642,103 $21,179 $42,150  1.97% 3.43%
                      

      Demand deposits in U.S. offices

        23,186  7,865             

      Other non-interest bearing liabilities(8)

        272,809  387,673             

      Total liabilities from discontinued operations

        12,670  31,013             
                        

      Total liabilities

       $1,742,454 $2,068,654             
                        

      Total Citigroup equity(11)

       $145,097 $131,245             

      Noncontrolling interest

        1,833  5,512             
                        

      Total Equity

       $146,930 $136,757             
                        

      Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

       $1,889,384 $2,205,411             
                    

      Net interest revenue as a percentage of average interest-earning assets(12)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $954,220 $1,025,789 $18,789 $19,187  2.63% 2.50%

      In offices outside the U.S.(6)

        637,738  750,481  18,964  21,291  3.98  3.79 
                    

      Total

       $1,591,958 $1,776,270 $37,753 $40,478  3.17% 3.04%
                    

      (1)
      Interest revenue excludes the taxable equivalent adjustments (based on the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%) of $566 million and $164 million for the first nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.

      (2)
      Interest rates and amounts include the effects of risk management activities associated with the respective asset and liability categories.

      (3)
      Monthly or quarterly averages have been used by certain subsidiaries where daily averages are unavailable.

      (4)
      Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

      (5)
      Savings deposits consist of Insured Money Market Rate accounts, NOW accounts, and other savings deposits. The second quarter of 2009 interest expense includes the one-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million.

      (6)
      Average rates reflect prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

      (7)
      Average volumes of securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase are reported net. However, Interest revenue is reflected gross.

      (8)
      The fair value carrying amounts of derivative and foreign exchange contracts are reported in non-interest-earning assets and other non-interest bearing liabilities.

      (9)
      Interest expense onTrading account liabilitiesof the ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assetsandTrading account liabilities, respectively.

      (10)
      Excludes hybrid financial instruments and beneficial interests in consolidated VIEs that are classified as long-term debt as these obligations are accounted for at fair value with changes recorded in Principal Transactions. In addition, the majority of the funding provided by Corporate Treasury to CitiCapital is excluded from this line.

      (11)
      Includes stockholders' equity from discontinued operations.

      (12)
      Includes allocations for capital and funding costs based on the location of the asset.

      Table of Contents


      ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

       
       3rd Qtr. 2009 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009 3rd Qtr. 2009 vs. 3rd Qtr. 2008 
       
       Increase (Decrease)
      Due to Change in:
        
       Increase (Decrease)
      Due to Change in:
        
       
      In millions of dollars Average
      Volume
       Average
      Rate
       Net
      Change
       Average
      Volume
       Average
      Rate
       Net
      Change
       

      Deposits with banks(4)

       $44 $(108)$(64)$611 $(1,090)$(479)
                    

      Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $34 $(73)$(39)$(122)$(674)$(796)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        39  (66) (27) (35) (656) (691)
                    

      Total

       $73 $(139)$(66)$(157)$(1,330)$(1,487)
                    

      Trading account assets(5)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $58 $(175)$(117)$(872)$(200)$(1,072)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        77  (227) (150) (186) (225) (411)
                    

      Total

       $135 $(402)$(267)$(1,058)$(425)$(1,483)
                    

      Investments(1)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $25 $(152)$(127)$98 $375 $473 

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        38  (63) (25) 376  (163) 213 
                    

      Total

       $63 $(215)$(152)$474 $212 $686 
                    

      Loans—consumer

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $(128)$64 $(64)$(591)$(818)$(1,409)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (48) 151  103  (689) (681) (1,370)
                    

      Total

       $(176)$215 $39 $(1,280)$(1,499)$(2,779)
                    

      Loans—corporate

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $(76)$(175)$(251)$(26)$(159)$(185)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (3) (113) (116) (417) (546) (963)
                    

      Total

       $(79)$(288)$(367)$(443)$(705)$(1,148)
                    

      Total loans

       $(255)$(73)$(328)$(1,723)$(2,204)$(3,927)
                    

      Other interest-earning assets

       $(43)$(73)$(116)$(309)$(453)$(762)
                    

      Total interest revenue

       $17 $(1,010)$(993)$(2,162)$(5,290)$(7,452)
                    

      (1)
      The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

      (2)
      Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

      (3)
      Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

      (4)
      Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

      (5)
      Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

      Table of Contents


      ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

       
       3rd Qtr. 2009 vs. 2nd Qtr. 2009 3rd Qtr. 2009 vs. 3rd Qtr. 2008 
       
       Increase (Decrease)
      Due to Change in:
        
       Increase (Decrease)
      Due to Change in:
        
       
      In millions of dollars Average
      Volume
       Average
      Rate
       Net
      Change
       Average
      Volume
       Average
      Rate
       Net
      Change
       

      Deposits

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $28 $(468)$(440)$99 $(427)$(328)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        108  (210) (102) (42) (2,247) (2,289)
                    

      Total

       $136 $(678)$(542)$57 $(2,674)$(2,617)
                    

      Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $(5)$(35)$(40)$(181)$(756)$(937)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (17) (102) (119) (340) (672) (1,012)
                    

      Total

       $(22)$(137)$(159)$(521)$(1,428)$(1,949)
                    

      Trading account liabilities(5)

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $4 $(26)$(22)$(59)$(164)$(223)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        1  (5) (4) (2) (17) (19)
                    

      Total

       $5 $(31)$(26)$(61)$(181)$(242)
                    

      Short-term borrowings

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $(49)$99 $50 $(164)$(306)$(470)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (13) (2) (15) (52) (52) (104)
                    

      Total

       $(62)$97 $35 $(216)$(358)$(574)
                    

      Long-term debt

                         

      In U.S. offices

       $191 $334 $525 $(55)$(453)$(508)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (17) 22  5  (93) (63) (156)
                    

      Total

       $174 $356 $530 $(148)$(516)$(664)
                    

      Total interest expense

       $231 $(393)$(162)$(889)$(5,157)$(6,046)
                    

      Net interest revenue

       $(214)$(617)$(831)$(1,273)$(133)$(1,406)
                    

      (1)
      The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

      (2)
      Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

      (3)
      Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

      (4)
      Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

      (5)
      Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

      Table of Contents

      ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN INTEREST REVENUE, INTEREST EXPENSE, AND NET INTEREST REVENUE(1)(2)(3)

       
       Nine Months 2009 vs. Nine Months 2008 
       
       Increase (Decrease)
      Due to Change in:
        
       
      In millions of dollars Average
      Volume
       Average
      Rate
       Net
      Change(2)
       

      Deposits at interest with banks(4)

       $1,809 $(3,012)$(1,203)
              

      Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

                

      In U.S. offices

       $(827)$(1,976)$(2,803)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (574) (1,967) (2,541)
              

      Total

       $(1,401)$(3,943)$(5,344)
              

      Trading account assets(5)

                

      In U.S. offices

       $(3,705)$(481)$(4,186)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (1,074) 224  (850)
              

      Total

       $(4,779)$(257)$(5,036)
              

      Investments(1)

                

      In U.S. offices

       $491 $920 $1,411 

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        771  (120) 651 
              

      Total

       $1,262 $800 $2,062 
              

      Loans—consumer

                

      In U.S. offices

       $(1,946)$(2,160)$(4,106)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (2,081) (1,961) (4,042)
              

      Total

       $(4,027)$(4,121)$(8,148)
              

      Loans—corporate

                

      In U.S. offices

       $60 $(372)$(312)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (1,914) (1,124) (3,038)
              

      Total

       $(1,854)$(1,496)$(3,350)
              

      Total loans

       $(5,881)$(5,617)$(11,498)
              

      Other interest-earning assets

       $(1,165)$(1,512)$(2,677)
              

      Total interest revenue

       $(10,155)$(13,541)$(23,696)
              

      Deposits

                

      In U.S. offices

       $96 $(1,212)$(1,116)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (1,206) (5,883) (7,089)
              

      Total

       $(1,110)$(7,095)$(8,205)
              

      Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

                

      In U.S. offices

       $(954)$(2,713)$(3,667)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (1,192) (1,893) (3,085)
              

      Total

       $(2,146)$(4,606)$(6,752)
              

      Trading account liabilities(5)

                

      In U.S. offices

       $(262)$(501)$(763)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (25) (56) (81)
              

      Total

       $(287)$(557)$(844)
              

      Short-term borrowings

                

      In U.S. offices

       $(380)$(1,480)$(1,860)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (185) (60) (245)
              

      Total

       $(565)$(1,540)$(2,105)
              

      Long-term debt

                

      In U.S. offices

       $(160)$(2,386)$(2,546)

      In offices outside the U.S.(4)

        (244) (275) (519)
              

      Total

       $(404)$(2,661)$(3,065)
              

      Total interest expense

       $(4,512)$(16,459)$(20,971)
              

      Net interest revenue

       $(5,643)$2,918 $(2,725)
              

      (1)
      The taxable equivalent adjustment is based on the U.S. Federal statutory tax rate of 35% and is excluded from this presentation.

      (2)
      Rate/volume variance is allocated based on the percentage relationship of changes in volume and changes in rate to the total net change.

      (3)
      Detailed average volume, interest revenue and interest expense exclude discontinued operations.

      (4)
      Changes in average rates reflect changes in prevailing local interest rates, including inflationary effects and monetary corrections in certain countries.

      (5)
      Interest expense onTrading account liabilities of the ICG is reported as a reduction of Interest revenue. Interest revenue and Interest expense on cash collateral positions are reported inTrading account assets andTrading account liabilities, respectively.

      Table of Contents


      CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

      CAPITAL RESOURCES

      Overview

              Generally, capital is generated by earnings from Citi's operating businesses. Primarily as a result of the exchange offers, Citigroup increased its Tier 1 Common by $63 billion from the second quarter of 2009 to $90 billion. In addition, the Company's Tangible Common Equity (TCE) increased by $62 billion from the second quarter of 2009 to $102 billion at September 30, 2009. Tier 1 Common, TCE and related ratios are used and relied on by the Company's banking regulators as a measure of capital adequacy, but are considered "non-GAAP financial measures" for SEC purposes. See "Capital Ratios," "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" and "Tangible Common Equity" below for additional information on these measures.

              The Company may also augment its capital through issuances of common stock, convertible preferred stock, preferred stock, subordinated debt underlying trust preferred securities, and equity issued through awards under employee benefit plans. Future business results of the Company, including events such as corporate dispositions, also affect the Company's capital levels. Moreover, changes that the FASB has adopted regarding off-balance sheet assets, consolidation and sale treatment willcould have an incrementaladverse impact on Citi's capital ratios. For more information on this, seehow these instruments are valued in the future if such conditions persist. See Note 1 "Future Application of Accounting Standards" and Note 1516 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, including "Funding, Liquidity Facilities and Subordinate Interests."

              Capital is used primarily to support assets in the Company's businesses and to absorb expected and unexpected market, credit or operational losses. While capital may be used for other purposes, such as to pay dividends or repurchase common stock, the Company's ability to utilize its capital for these purposes is currently restricted due to its participation in TARP and other government programs, as explained more fully in the Company's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K and its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, respectively.

              Citigroup's capital management framework is designed to ensure that Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries maintain sufficient capital consistent with the Company's risk profile, all applicable regulatory standards and guidelines, and external rating agency considerations. The capital management process is centrally overseen by senior management and is reviewed at the consolidated, legal entity and country level.

              Senior management oversees the capital management process mainly through Citigroup's Finance and Asset and Liability Committee (FinALCO). The Committee is composed of the senior-most management of Citigroup for the purpose of engaging management in decision-making and related discussions on capital and liquidity matters. Among other things, the Committee's responsibilities include: determining the financial structure of Citigroup and its principal subsidiaries; ensuring that Citigroup and its regulated entities are adequately capitalized; determining appropriate asset levels and return hurdles for Citigroup and individual businesses; reviewing the funding and capital markets plan for Citigroup; and monitoring interest-rate risk, corporate and bank liquidity and the impact of currency translation on non-U.S. earnings and capital.Statements.

      Capital Ratios        (2)   

              Citigroup is subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by the FRB. Historically, capital adequacy has been measured, in part, based on two risk-based capital ratios, the Tier 1 and Total Capital (Tier 1 + Tier 2 Capital) ratios. Tier 1 Capital consists of core capital, while Total Capital also includes other items such as subordinated debt and allowance for credit losses. Both measures of capital adequacy are stated as a percentage of risk-weighted assets. In conjunction with the conclusion of the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (SCAP), the banking regulators developed a new measure of capital called Tier 1 Common defined as Tier 1 Capital less non-common elements including qualifying perpetual preferred stock, qualifying noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries and qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts.

              Citigroup's risk-weighted assets are principally derived from application of the risk-based capital guidelines related to the measurement of credit risk, under which on-balance sheet assets and the credit equivalent amount of certain off-balance sheet exposures (such as financial guarantees, unfunded lending commitments, letters of credit, and derivatives) are assigned to one of several prescribed risk weight categories based upon the perceived credit risk associated with the obligor, or if relevant, the guarantor, the nature of the collateral, or external credit ratings. Risk-weighted assets also incorporate a measure for market risk on covered trading account positions, and all foreign exchange and commodity positions whether or not carried in the trading account. Excluded from risk-weighted assets are any assets, such as goodwill and deferred tax assets, to the extent required to be deducted from regulatory capital. See "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" below.

              Citigroup is also subject to a Leverage ratio requirement, a non-risk-based measure of capital adequacy, which is defined as Tier 1 Capital as a percentage of quarterly adjusted average total assets.

              To be "well capitalized" under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, a bank holding company must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio ofAssets held at least 6%, a Total Capital ratio of at least 10%, and a Leverage Ratio of at least 3%, and not be subject to an FRB directive to maintain higher capital levels. The following table sets forth Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.


      amortized costTable of Contents

      Citigroup Regulatory Capital Ratios

       
       Sept. 30,
      2009
       Dec. 31,
      2008
       

      Tier 1 Common

        9.12% 2.30%

      Tier 1 Capital

        12.76  11.92 

      Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

        16.58  15.70 

      Leverage(1)

        6.87  6.08 
            

      (1)
      Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average total assets.

              As noted in the table above, Citigroup was "well capitalized" under the federal bank regulatory agency definitions as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.

      Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines

      In millions of dollars Sept. 30,
      2009
       Dec. 31,
      2008(1)
       

      Tier 1 Common

             

      Citigroup common stockholders' equity

       $140,530 $70,966 

      Less: Net unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale, net of tax(2)

        (4,242) (9,647)

      Less: Accumulated net losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax

        (4,177) (5,189)

      Less: Pension liability adjustment, net of tax(3)

        (2,619) (2,615)

      Less: Cumulative effect included in fair value of financial liabilities attributable to the change in own credit worthiness, net of tax(4)

        1,862  3,391 

      Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets(5)

        21,917  23,520 

      Less: Intangible assets:

             
       

      Goodwill(6)

        26,436  27,132 
       

      Other disallowed intangible assets(6)

        10,179  10,607 

      Other

        (892) (840)
            

      Total Tier 1 Common

       $90,282 $22,927 
            

      Qualifying perpetual preferred stock

       $312 $70,664 

      Qualifying mandatorily redeemable securities of subsidiary trusts

        34,403  23,899 

      Qualifying noncontrolling interests

        1,288  1,268 
            

      Total Tier 1 Capital

       $126,285 $118,758 
            

      Tier 2 Capital

             

      Allowance for credit losses(7)

       $12,701 $12,806 

      Qualifying subordinated debt(8)

        24,355  24,791 

      Net unrealized pretax gains on available-for- sale equity securities(2)

        753  43 
            

      Total Tier 2 Capital

       $37,809 $37,640 
            

      Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

       $164,094 $156,398 
            

      Risk-Weighted Assets(9)

       $989,711 $996,247 
            

      (1)
      Reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

      (2)
      Tier 1 Capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, in accordance with risk-based capital guidelines. In arriving at Tier 1 Capital, banking organizations are required to deduct net unrealized losses on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax. Banking organizations are permitted to include in Tier 2 Capital up to 45% of pretax net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values.

      (3)
      The FRB granted interim capital relief for the impact of adopting ASC 715-20-65 (SFAS 158).

      (4)
      The impact of including Citigroup's own credit rating in valuing liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected is excluded from Tier 1 Capital, in accordance with risk-based capital guidelines.

      (5)
      Of the Company's approximately $38$1.7 billion of net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2009, approximately $13securities classified as HTM and $32.6 billion of such assetsloans and commitments. The HTM securities were includable without limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $22 billion of such assets exceeded the limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as "disallowed deferred tax assets," were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 Capital. The Company's other approximately $3 billion of net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2009 primarily represented the deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, which are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to limitation under the guidelines. The Company had approximately $24 billion of disallowed deferred tax assets at December 31, 2008.

      (6)
      Includes goodwill/intangible assets of related to assets of discontinued operations held for sale and assets held for sale.

      (7)
      Includable up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets. Any excess allowance is deducted in arriving at risk-weighted assets.

      (8)
      Includes qualifying subordinated debt in an amount not exceeding 50% of Tier 1 Capital.

      (9)
      Includes risk-weighted credit equivalent amounts, net of applicable bilateral netting agreements, of $70.3 billion for interest rate, commodity, and equity derivative contracts, foreign-exchange contracts, and credit derivatives as of September 30, 2009, compared with $102.9 billion as of December 31, 2008. Market-risk-equivalent assets included in risk-weighted assets amounted to $91.1 billion at September 30, 2009 and $101.8 billion at December 31, 2008. Risk-weighted assets also include the effect of certain other off-balance sheet exposures, such as unused lending commitments and letters of credit, and reflect deductions for certain intangible assets and any excess allowance for credit losses.

      Recent Actions Impacting Citigroup's Risk-Weighted Assets

              All three of Citigroup's primary credit card securitization trusts—the Master Trust, Omni Trust and Broadway Trust—had bonds placed on ratings watch with negative implications by rating agencies during the first and second quarters of 2009. As a result of the ratings watch status, certain actions were taken by Citi with respect to each of the trusts. In general, the actions subordinated certain senior interests in the trust assets that were retained by Citi, which effectively placed these interests below investor interests in terms of priority of payment.

              With respect to the Master Trust, in the first quarter of 2009, Citi subordinated a portion of its "seller's interest," which represents a senior interest in trust receivables, thus making those cash flows available to pay investor coupons each month. In addition, during the second quarter of 2009, a subordinated note with a $3 billion principal amount was issued by the Master Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The note is classified as a held-to-maturity investment security.

              With respect to the Omni Trust, in the second quarter of 2009, subordinated notes with a principal amount of $2 billion were issued by the trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The notes are classified as Trading account assets. These notes are in addition to a $265 million subordinated note issued by Omni Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. insuch during the fourth quarter of 2008 and were previously classified as either trading or AFS. They are accounted for the same purpose of providing additionalat amortized cost, subject to other-than-temporary impairment. Loans and commitments are recorded at amortized cost, less loan loss reserves. The impact from changes in credit support for senior noteholders.

              With respect to the Broadway Trust,is reflected in the second quartercalculation of 2009, subordinated notes with a principal amountthe allowance for loan losses and in net credit losses.

              (3)   Equity and other investments include approximately $3.5 billion of $82 million were issued byequity and other investments, such as limited partner fund investments, that are accounted for under the trust and retained by Citibank, N.A. in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The notes are classified as Trading account assets.

              As a result of these actions,equity method, which recognizes gains or losses based on the applicable regulatory capital rules, Citigroup included the sold assetsinvestor's share of the Master and Omni Trusts (commencing with the first quarter of


      Table of Contents

      2009) and the Broadway Trust (commencing with the second quarter of 2009) in its risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating its risk-based capital ratios. The effect of these changes increased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by approximately $82 billion, and decreased Citigroup's Tier 1 Capital ratio by approximately 100 basis points, each as of March 31, 2009, with respect to the Master and Omni Trusts. The inclusionnet income of the Broadway Trust increased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by an additional approximately $900 million at June 30, 2009. All bond ratings for each of the trusts have been affirmed by the rating agencies, and no downgrades have occurred as of September 30, 2009.


      Common Equity

              Citigroup's common stockholders' equity increased by approximately $70 billion to $141 billion, and represented 7.4% of total assets as of September 30, 2009, from $71 billion and 3.7% at December 31, 2008.

              The table below summarizes the change in Citigroup's common stockholders' equity during the first nine months of 2009:

      In billions of dollars  
       

      Common equity, December 31, 2008

       $71.0 

      Net income(1)

        6.0 

      Employee benefit plans and other activities

        0.5 

      Dividends

        (3.4)

      Exchange offers(1)

        58.9 

      Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

        7.5 
          

      Common equity, September 30, 2009

       $140.5 
          

      (1)
      Net income includes $0.9 billion related to the conversion of trust preferred securities held by public investors into common stock as described under "Significant Events in the Third Quarter of 2009—Exchange Offers" above.

              As of September 30, 2009, $6.7 billion of stock repurchases remained under authorized repurchase programs. No material repurchases were made in 2008 and the first nine months of 2009.

      Tangible Common Equity

              TCE, as defined by Citigroup, representsCommon equity lessGoodwill andIntangible assets (excluding MSRs) net of therelated net deferred tax liabilities. Other companies may calculate TCE in a manner different from Citigroup. Citi's TCE was $102.3 billion at September 30, 2009 and $31.1 billion at December 31, 2008.

              The TCE ratio (TCE divided by risk-weighted assets—see "Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines" above) was 10.3% at September 30, 2009 and 3.1% at December 31, 2008. A reconciliation of Citigroup's total stockholders' equity to TCE follows:

      In millions of dollars, except ratio September 30,
      2009
       December 31,
      2008
       

      Total Citigroup Stockholders' Equity

       $140,842 $141,630 

      Less:

             
       

      Preferred Stock

        312  70,664 
            

      Common Equity

       $140,530 $70,966 

      Less:

             
       

      Goodwill—as reported

        25,423  27,132 
       

      Intangible Assets (other than MSRs)—as reported

        8,957  14,159 
       

      Goodwill and Intangible Assets—recorded as Assets of Discontinued Operations Held for Sale

        3,856   
       

      Goodwill and Intangible Assets— recorded as Assets held-for-sale

        1,377   
        

      Less: Related Net Deferred Tax Liabilities

        1,381  1,382 
            

      Tangible Common Equity (TCE)

       $102,298 $31,057 
            

      Tangible Assets

             

      GAAP Assets—as reported

       $1,888,599 $1,938,470 

      Less:

             
       

      Goodwill—as reported

        25,423  27,132 
       

      Intangible Assets (other than MSRs)—as reported

        8,957  14,159 
       

      Goodwill and Intangible Assets— recorded as Assets of Discontinued Operations Held for Sale

        3,856   
       

      Goodwill and Intangible Assets— recorded as Assets held-for-sale

        1,377   
       

      Related deferred tax assets

        1,272  1,285 
            

      Tangible Assets (TA)

       $1,847,714 $1,895,894 
            

      Risk-Weighted Assets (RWA) under"Components of Capital Under Regulatory Guidelines"

       $989,711 $996,247 
            

      TCE/TA RATIO

        5.5% 1.6%
            

      TCE RATIO (TCE/RWA)

        10.3% 3.1%
            

      Table of Contents

      Capital Resources of Citigroup's Depository Institutions

              Citigroup's U.S. subsidiary depository institutions are subject to risk-based capital guidelines issued by their respective primary federal bank regulatory agencies, which are similar to the FRB's guidelines. To be "well capitalized" under these regulatory definitions, Citigroup's depository institutions must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6%, a Total Capital (Tier 1 + Tier 2 Capital) ratio of at least 10% and a Leverage ratio of at least 5%, and not be subject to a regulatory directive to meet and maintain higher capital levels.

              At September 30, 2009, all of Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions were "well capitalized" under federal bank regulatory agency definitions, including Citigroup's primary depository institution, Citibank, N.A., as noted in the following table:

      Citibank, N.A. Components of Capital and Ratios Under Regulatory Guidelines

      In billions of dollars Sept. 30,
      2009
       Dec. 31,
      2008
       

      Tier 1 Capital

       $95.8 $71.0 

      Total Capital (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

        110.8  108.4 
            

      Tier 1 Capital Ratio

        15.16% 9.94%

      Total Capital Ratio (Tier 1 and Tier 2)

        17.53  15.18 

      Leverage Ratio(1)

        8.37  5.82 
            

      (1)
      Tier 1 Capital divided by each period's quarterly adjusted average total assets.

              Citibank, N.A. had a net loss of $2.3 billion for the first nine months of 2009.

              In addition, during the first nine months of 2009, Citibank, N.A. received capital contributions from its immediate parent company, Citicorp, in the amount of $30.5 billion.

              Total subordinated notes issued to Citibank, N.A.'s immediate parent company, Citicorp, included in Citibank, N.A.'s Tier 2 Capital declined from $28.2 billion outstanding at December 31, 2008 to $6.5 billion outstanding at September 30, 2009, reflecting the redemption of $21.7 billion of subordinated notes in the first nine months of 2009.

              The significant events in the latter half of 2008 and the first nine months of 2009 impacting the capital of Citigroup also affected, or could affect, Citibank, N.A. which is subject to separate banking regulation and examination.


      Table of Contentsinvestee.

              The following table presents the estimated sensitivityprovides a summary of Citigroup's Global CRE funded and Citibank, N.A.'s capital ratios to changes of $100 million of Tier 1 or Total Capital (numerator), or changes of $1 billion in risk-weighted assets or adjusted average total assets (denominator) based on financial information as ofunfunded exposures at September 30, 2009. This information is provided solely for the purpose of analyzing the impact that a change in the Company's financial position or results of operations could have on these ratios. These sensitivities only consider a single change to either a component of capital, risk-weighted assets or adjusted average total assets. Accordingly, an event that affects more than one factor may have a larger basis-point impact than is reflected in this table.2010:


      Tier 1 Common RatioTier 1 Capital RatioTotal Capital RatioLeverage Ratio

      Impact of $100
      million change in
      Tier 1 Common
      Impact of $1
      billion change in
      risk-weighted
      assets
      Impact of $100
      million change in
      Tier 1 Capital
      Impact of $1
      billion change in
      risk-weighted
      assets
      Impact of $100
      million change in
      total capital
      Impact of $1
      billion change in
      risk-weighted
      assets
      Impact of $100
      million change in
      Tier 1 Capital
      Impact of $1
      billion change in
      adjusted average
      total assets

      Citigroup

      1.0 bps0.9 bps1.0 bps1.3 bps1.0 bps1.7 bps0.5 bps0.4 bps

      Citibank, N.A. 

      1.6 bps2.4 bps1.6 bps2.8 bps0.9 bps0.7 bps
      In billions of dollars September 30,
      2010
       

      Institutional Clients Group

          
       

      CRE exposures carried at fair value (including AFS securities)

       $4.0 
       

      Loans and unfunded commitments

        15.9 
       

      HTM securities

        1.6 
       

      Equity method investments

        3.3 
          
       

      Total ICG

       $24.8 
          

      Special Asset Pool

          
       

      CRE exposures carried at fair value (including AFS)

       $2.2 
       

      Loans and unfunded commitments

        8.0 
       

      HTM securities

        0.1 
       

      Equity method investments

        0.2 
          
       

      Total SAP

       $10.5 
          

      Regional Consumer Banking

          
       

      Loans and unfunded commitments

       $2.7 
          

      Local Consumer Lending

          
       

      Loans and unfunded commitments

       $6.0 
          

      Brokerage and Asset Management

          
       

      CRE exposures carried at fair value

       $0.5 
          

      Total Citigroup

       $44.5 
          

      Broker-Dealer Subsidiaries        On August 10, 2010,

              At September 30, 2009, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiaryLCL sold a $3.5 billion portfolio of Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc., had net capital, computed in accordance with the SEC's net capital rule, of $9.1 billion, which exceeded the minimum requirement by $8.4 billion.

              In addition, certain of the Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries are subjectperforming multifamily and CRE loans to regulation in the other countries in which they do business, including requirements to maintain specified levels of net capital or its equivalent. The Company's broker-dealer subsidiaries were in compliance with their capital requirements at September 30, 2009. The requirements applicable to these subsidiaries in the U.S. and in particular other jurisdictions are the subject of political debate and potential change in light of recent events.

      Regulatory Capital Standards Developments

              Citigroup supports the move toJP Morgan Chase. Citi recorded a new set of risk-based capital standards, published on June 26, 2004 (and subsequently amended in November 2005) by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, consisting of central banks and bank supervisors from 13 countries. The international version of the Basel II framework will allow Citigroup to leverage internal risk models used to measure credit, operational, and market risk exposures to drive regulatory capital calculations.

              On December 7, 2007, the U.S. banking regulators published the rules for large banks to comply with Basel II in the U.S. These rules require Citigroup, as a large and internationally active bank, to comply with the most advanced Basel II approaches for calculating credit and operational risk capital requirements. The U.S. implementation timetable consists of a parallel calculation period under the current regulatory capital regime (Basel I) and Basel II, starting anytime between April 1, 2008 and April 1, 2010, followed by a three-year transition period, typically starting 12 months after the beginning of parallel reporting. U.S. regulators have reserved the right to change how Basel II is applied in the U.S. following a review at the end of the second year of the transitional period, and to retain the existing prompt corrective action and leverage capital requirements applicable to banking organizations in the U.S. The Company intends to implement Basel II within the timeframe required by the final rules. The Basel II (or its successor) requirements are the subject of political debate and potential change in light of recent events.


      Table of Contents


      FUNDING AND LIQUIDITY

      Overview

              Because Citigroup is a bank holding company, substantially all of its net earnings are generated within its operating subsidiaries. These subsidiaries make funds available to Citigroup, primarily in the form of dividends. Citigroup's liquidity management is structured to optimize the free flow of funds through the Company's legal and regulatory structure; however, various constraints, discussed below, limit certain subsidiaries' dividend-paying abilities. Consistent with these constraints, Citigroup's primary objectives for liquidity management are established by entity and in aggregate across three main operating entities, as follows: (i) Citigroup, as the parent holding company; (ii) banking subsidiaries; and (iii) non-banking subsidiaries.

      Citigroup

              As a result of continued deleveraging, deposit growth, term securitization under government and non-government programs, and the issuance of long-term debt under government guarantees and non-guaranteed debt, over the last several quarters, Citigroup has substantially increased its cash balances and reduced its short-term borrowings. In addition, as of September 30, 2009, Citigroup had largely eliminated utilization of short-term government funding programs.

              Beginning in October 2008, Citi and certain of its subsidiaries participated in the FDIC's TLGP pursuant to which certain qualifying senior unsecured debt issued by such entities is guaranteed, pursuant to the applicable time period, in amounts up to 125% of the qualifying debt for each qualifying entity (see "Government Programs—FDIC's Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program" above). As of September 30, 2009, Citigroup and its affiliates have issued a totalpretax loss of approximately $54.7 billion of long-term debt that is covered under the FDIC guarantee. Also as of September 30, 2009, Citigroup, through its subsidiaries, has issued approximately $4.37 billion$295 million on this sale in commercial paper and interbank deposits backed by the FDIC program.

              The TLGP expired on October 31, 2009 and Citigroup and its affiliates have elected not to participate in any FDIC- approved extension of the program. In anticipation of the expiration of the program, and as market conditions began to improve, Citigroup and its first tier subsidiaries have issued $20 billion of non-guaranteed debt outside of TLGP over the past six months. Such issuances have been at various maturities, with a weighted average maturity of over 10 years, in multiple currencies. In addition, beginning October 1, 2009, Citigroup has been issuing commercial paper, of any tenor, outside of the TLGP and the Company currently anticipates that commercial paper will continue to be an important funding source during 2010, although not at 2008/2009 levels.

              At September 30, 2009, long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding for Citigroup, CGMHI, Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI) and other Citigroup subsidiaries, collectively, were as follows:

      In billions of dollars Citigroup
      parent
      company
       CGMHI(1) CFI(1) Other
      Citigroup
      Subsidiaries
       

      Long-term debt

       $215.0 $15.4 $51.2 $98.0(2)

      Commercial paper

       $ $ $10.0 $0.4 
                

      (1)
      Citigroup guarantees all of CFI's debt and CGMHI's publicly issued securities.

      (2)
      At September 30, 2009, approximately $30.6 billion relates to collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

              The table below details the long-term debt issuances of Citigroup during the past four quarters.

      In billions of dollars 4Q08 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09 Total 

      Debt issued under TLGP guarantee

       $5.8 $21.9 $17.0 $10.0 $54.7 

      Debt issued without TLGP guarantee:

                      
       

      Citigroup parent company/CFI

        0.3  2.0  7.4  12.6  22.3 
       

      Other Citigroup subsidiaries

        0.5  0.5  10.1(1) 7.9(2) 19.0 
                  

      Total

       $6.6 $24.4 $34.5 $30.5 $96.0 
                  

      (1)
      Includes $8.5 billion issued by The Student Loan Corporation through the U.S. government sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility, and $1 billion issued by Citigroup Pty. Ltd. in Australia and guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Australia.

      (2)
      Includes $3.3 billion issued by The Student Loan Corporation through the U.S. government sponsored Department of Education Conduit Facility, and $1 billion issued by Citigroup Pty. Ltd. in Australia and guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Australia.

              See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail on Citigroup's and its affiliates' long-term debt and commercial paper outstanding.

              Outside of long-term debt funding, Citi has been actively building its structural liquidity in two important ways. First, Citi has focused on growing a geographically diverse retail and corporate deposit base which stood at approximately $833 billion as of September 30, 2009, up $28 billion compared to June 30, 2009. On a volume basis, deposit increases were noted in Regional Consumer Banking, particularly in North America, and in Transaction Services due to growth in all regions and strength in Treasury and Trade Solutions, excluding the impact of foreign exchange on a volume basis. Citi's deposit base has increased sequentially over each of the last five quarters. These deposits are diversified across products and regions, with approximately 61% outside of the U.S. This diversification provides the Company with an important and low-cost source of funding. A significant portion of these deposits has been, and is currently expected to be, long-term and stable and is considered to be core.

              Second, total assets as of September 30, 2009 have declined 8% as compared to September 30, 2008. Loans, which are one of the Company's most illiquid assets, are down $107 billion, or approximately 15%.


      Table of Contents

              As of September 30, 2009, Citigroup and affiliates liquidity portfolio and broker-dealer "cash box" totaled $76.0 billion as compared with $66.8 billion at December 31, 2008 and $50.5 billion at September 30, 2008, and Citigroup's bank subsidiaries had an aggregate of approximately $148.8 billion of cash on deposit with major Central Banks (including the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the European Central Bank, Bank of England, Swiss National Bank and Bank of Japan), compared with approximately $72 billion at December 31, 2008. These amounts are in addition to cash deposited from the broker-dealer "cash box" noted above. Citigroup's bank subsidiaries also have significant additional liquidity resources through unencumbered highly liquid securities and other assets available for secured funding through private markets or that are, or could be, pledged to the major Central Banks and the U.S. Federal Home Loan Banks. The liquidity value of the liquid securities was $59.4 billion at September 30, 2009 compared with $53.3 billion at June 30, 2009. Significant amounts of cash and liquid securities are also available in other Citigroup entities.

              As a result of the actions described above and the Company's current funding levels, management currently believes Citi is largely pre-funded heading into 2010, with a deliberately liquid and flexible balance sheet. The combined parent and broker-dealer entities maintain sufficient liquidity to meet all maturing unsecured debt obligations due within a one-year time horizon, without accessing the unsecured markets.

      Banking Subsidiaries—Constraints on Dividends

              There are various legal limitations on the ability of Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions to extend credit, pay dividends or otherwise supply funds to Citigroup and its non-bank subsidiaries. Currently, the approval of the OCC, in the case of national banks, or the Office of Thrift Supervision, in the case of federal savings banks, is required if total dividends declared in any calendar year exceed amounts specified by the applicable agency's regulations. State-chartered depository institutions are subject to dividend limitations imposed by applicable state law.

              In determining the declaration of dividends, each depository institution must also consider its effect on applicable risk-based capital and leverage ratio requirements, as well as policy statements of the federal regulatory agencies that indicate that banking organizations should generally pay dividends out of current operating earnings. Citigroup did not receive any dividends from its banking subsidiaries during the third quarter of 2009.

      Non-Banking Subsidiaries—Constraints on Dividends2010.

              Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries, including Citigroup Global Market Holdings Inc. (CGMHI), are generally not subject to regulatory restrictions on dividends. However, the ability of CGMHI to declare dividends can be restricted by capital considerations of its broker-dealer subsidiaries.

              CGMHI's consolidated balance sheet is liquid, withThe above CRE exposure represents the vast majority of its assets consisting of marketable securities and collateralized short-term financing agreements arising from securities transactions. CGMHI monitors and evaluates the adequacy of its capital and borrowing base on a daily basisCiti's exposure to maintain liquidity andcommercial real estate. There may be other exposures that have indirect exposures to ensureCRE that its capital base supports the regulatory capital requirements of its subsidiaries.

              Some of Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries, including CGMHI, have credit facilities with Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions, including Citibank, N.A. Borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. There are various legal restrictions on the extent to which a bank holding company and certain of its non-bank subsidiaries can borrow or obtain credit from Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions or engage in certain other transactions with them. In general, these restrictions require that transactions be on arm's-length terms and be secured by designated amounts of specified collateral. See Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


      ®Table of Contents

      Credit Ratings

              Citigroup's ability to access the capital markets and other sources of funds, as well as the cost of these funds and its ability to maintain certain deposits, is highly dependent on its credit ratings. The table below indicates the current ratings for Citigroup. Generally, since May of 2009, Citigroup's ratings have largely been consistent and stable.

              As a result of the Citigroup guarantee, changes in ratings and ratings outlooks for CFI are the same as those of Citigroup noted above.

      Citigroup's Debt Ratings as of September 30, 2009


      Citigroup Inc.Citigroup Funding Inc.Citibank, N.A.

      Senior
      debt
      Commercial
      paper
      Senior
      debt
      Commercial
      paper
      Long-
      term
      Short-
      term

      Fitch Ratings

      A+F1+A+F1+A+F1+

      Moody's Investors Service

      A3P-1A3P-1A1P-1

      Standard & Poor's

      AA-1AA-1A+A-1

              Ratings downgrades by Fitch Ratings, Moody's Investors Service or Standard & Poor's have had and could continue to have impacts on funding and liquidity, and could also have further explicit impact on liquidity due to collateral triggers and other cash requirements. Because of the current credit ratings of Citigroup Inc., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating would likely impact Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating. As of September 30, 2009, a one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term rating of Citigroup Inc., accompanied by a one-notch downgrade of Citigroup Inc.'s commercial paper/short-term rating, would result in an approximately $15.9 billion funding requirementnot reflected in the form of collateral and cash obligations. Further, as of September 30, 2009, a one-notch downgrade of the senior debt/long-term ratings of Citibank, N.A. would result in an approximately $4.4 billion funding requirement in the form of collateral and cash obligations. Because of the current credit ratings of Citibank, N.A., a one-notch downgrade of its senior debt/long-term rating is unlikely to have any impact on its commercial paper/short-term rating.table above.

              As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 166 and SFAS 167 (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), certain credit rating agencies have raised concerns about the loss of GAAP sale treatment in certain securitization transactions and the resulting effects under the FDIC's securitization rule. Specifically, under the FDIC's securitization rule, so long as a securitization is accounted for as a sale for GAAP purposes and certain other conditions are satisfied, the FDIC, when acting as conservator or receiver of an insolvent bank, will also treat the transferred assets as sold and thus surrender its rights to reclaim the financial assets transferred in the securitization. With the adoption of SFAS 166 and SFAS 167, GAAP sales treatment will be eliminated in certain securitizations, thus potentially putting securitized assets at risk of seizure by the FDIC in cases of conservatorship or receivership.

              The FDIC is considering a revision to its current regulations that would continue to recognize the legal isolation of securitized assets after the adoption of SFAS 166 and SFAS 167; however, it is unclear at this time what changes to the rules, if any, will be made or if the affected securitization structures will need to be modified in order to comply with those rules. If the FDIC does not act and/or if the affected securitization vehicles are unable to take appropriate steps to restructure their programs, the bond ratings of certain notes issued by these securitization vehicles, including Citi's credit card securitization vehicles, could be lowered or withdrawn. In addition, these securitization vehicles may be unable to issue new bonds with a rating that is higher than the sponsoring bank's then-current rating.


      Table of Contents


      OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

              Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs), primarily in connection with securitization activities in Regional Consumer Banking and Local Consumer Lending. Citigroup and its subsidiaries use SPEs principally to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroup's financial assets, assisting clients in securitizing their financial assets and creating investment products for clients. For further information about the Company's securitization activities and involvement in SPEs, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

              The following tables describe certain characteristics of assets owned by certain identified significant unconsolidated variable interest entities (VIEs) as of September 30, 2009. These VIEs and the Company's exposure to the VIEs are described in Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

              See also Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Elimination of QSPEs and Changes in the Consolidation Model for Variable Interest Entities."

       
        
        
       Credit rating distribution 
      Citi-Administered Asset-Backed
      Commercial Paper Conduits
       Total
      assets
      (in billions)
       Weighted
      average
      life
       AAA AA A BBB/BBB+
      and below
       

       $39.7 4.55 years  41% 44% 11% 4%
                    


      Asset class% of total
      portfolio

      Student loans

      31%

      Trade receivables

      9%

      Credit cards and consumer loans

      4%

      Portfolio finance

      11%

      Commercial loans and corporate credit

      17%

      Export finance

      19%

      Auto

      5%

      Residential mortgage

      4%

      Total

      100%


       
        
        
       Credit rating distribution 
      Collateralized Debt and Loan
      Obligations
       Total
      assets
      (in billions)
       Weighted
      average
      life
       A or higher BBB BB/B CCC Unrated 

      Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

       $16.1 3.9 years  12% 12% 12% 49% 15%
                      

      Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

       $13.8 6.6 years  1% 1% 45% 8% 45%
                      


       
       Credit rating distribution 
      Municipal Securities Tender Option
      Bond Trusts (TOB)
       Total
      assets
      (in billions)
       Weighted
      average
      life
       AAA/Aaa AA/Aa1 –
      AA-/Aa3
       Less than
      AA-/Aa3
       

      Customer TOB trusts (not consolidated)

       $8.5 12.4 years  12% 85% 3%

      Proprietary TOB trusts (consolidated and non-consolidated)

       $13.0 16.3 years  8% 77% 15%

      QSPE TOB trusts (not consolidated)

       $0.7 10.9 years  88% 12% 0%
                  

      Table of Contents


      CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

              See the Company's 2008Citi's 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements herein,in this Form 10-Q for a discussion of contractual obligations.


      FAIR VALUATION

              For a discussion of fair value of assets and liabilities, see Note 17 and Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


      CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

      Disclosure

              Citigroup's disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, including without limitation that information required to be disclosed by Citi in its SEC filings is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

              Citigroup's Disclosure Committee assists the CEO and CFO in their responsibilities to design, establish, maintain and evaluate the effectiveness of Citi's disclosure controls and procedures. The Company'sDisclosure Committee is responsible for, among other things, the oversight, maintenance and implementation of the disclosure controls and procedures, subject to the supervision and oversight of the CEO and CFO.

              Citigroup's management, with the participation of the Company'sits CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company'sCitigroup's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 20092010 and, based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that at that date the Company'sCitigroup's disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

      Financial Reporting

              There were no changes in the Company'sCitigroup's internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 20092010 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company'sCiti's internal control over financial reporting.


      Table of Contents


      FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

              Certain statements in this Form 10-Q, including but not limited to statements included within the "Management'sManagement's Discussion and Analysis" of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Actrules and regulations of 1995.the SEC. Generally, "forward-looking statements"forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but instead represent only the Company'sCitigroup's and management's beliefs regarding future events. Such statements may be identified by words such as "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "intend," "estimate," "maybelieve, expect, anticipate, intend, estimate, may increase," "may may fluctuate", and similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as "will," "should," "would"will, should, would and "could."could.

              Such statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors, including but not limited to those described below:

        without limitation the precautionary statements included in this Form 10-Q and the Forms 10-Q for the first and second quarters of 2010, the factors listed and described under "Risk Factors" in Citigroup's 2008Citi's 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K;10-K, and the factors described below:

          the continuing impact of the economic recession, including without limitation potential declines in the Home Price Index and continued high unemployment in the U.S., and disruptions in the global financial markets on Citi's business and results of operations;

          the Company's ability to continue to successfully execute its strategy in winding down Citi Holdings;impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Financial Reform Act) on Citi's businesses, business practices and costs of operations;

          the continued impact of The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009 on Citi's credit card businesses and business models;

          Citi's reputationparticipation in U.S. government programs to modify first and second lien mortgage loans, as well as any future U.S. government modification programs and Citi's own loss mitigation and forbearance programs, and their effect on the continued strengthamount and recognitiontiming of the Company's brand name on a global basis;

          Citi's earnings, delinquencies and credit ratings and the credit ratings of our securitizations;losses related to those loans;

          the Company's abilityexpiration of a provision of the U.S. tax law allowing Citi to continuedefer U.S. taxes on certain active financial services income and its effect on Citi's tax expense;

          risks arising from Citi's extensive operations outside the U.S.;

          potential reduction in earnings available to retainCiti's common stockholders and motivate its employee talent, as well as attract new talent, particularly as a resultreturn on Citi's equity due to future issuances of significant compensation restrictions imposed by recent government and legislative actions;Citi common stock;

          the realizationcontinued effect of the Company's recognized net deferred tax asset at September 30, 2009 andU.S. Treasury's sale of its stake in Citi on the effect that market price of Citi common stock;

          an ownership change (as defined in Section 382 of"ownership change" under the Internal Revenue Code) could haveCode and its effect on the Company'sCiti's ability to utilize its deferred tax asset, which is a component of TCE,assets to offset future taxable income;

          the impact of The Card Accountability, Responsibilityincreases in FDIC insurance premiums, as well as changes in the methodology to calculate such premiums, and Disclosureother proposed fees on banks on Citi's earnings;

          Citi's ability to compete effectively in the financial services industry on a global, regional and product basis and with competitors who may face fewer regulatory constraints;

          Citi's ability to hire and retain qualified employees;

          Citi's ability to maintain the value of the Citi brand;

          Citi's ability to maintain, or increased cost of maintaining, adequate capital funding and liquidity, particularly in light of changing regulatory capital requirements pursuant to the Financial Reform Act, the capital and liquidity standards proposed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and U.S. regulators, or otherwise;

          Citi's continuing ability to obtain financing from external sources and maintain adequate liquidity;

          reduction in Citi's or its subsidiaries' credit ratings, including in response to the passage of 2009 (CARD Act)the Financial Reform Act, and its effect on the Company's credit cardcost of funding from, and access to, the capital markets and on Citi's collateral requirements or other aspects of its costs of operations;

          market disruptions and their impact on the risk of customer or counterparty delinquency or default;

          the outcome of inquiries and proceedings by governmental entities, or judicial and regulatory decisions, regarding practices in the residential mortgage industry, including among other things the processes followed for foreclosing residential mortgages and mortgage transfer and securitization processes;

          Citi's continued review of its existing and historical foreclosure processes;

          the exposure of Citi, as originator of residential mortgage loans, sponsor of residential mortgage-backed securitization transactions or servicer of such loans or in such transactions, or in other capacities, to government sponsored enterprises (GSEs), investors, mortgage insurers or other third parties as a result of representations and warranties made in connection with the transfer or securitization of such loans;

          Citi's ability to continue to successfully wind down Citi Holdings and its failure to realize all of the anticipated benefits of the realignment of Citi's businesses;

          Citi's ability to continue to control expenses, including through reductions at Citi Holdings, and to fund investments intended to enhance the success and operations of Citicorp;

          volatile and illiquid market conditions, which could lead to further write-downs of Citi's financial instruments;

          the accuracy of Citi's assumptions and estimates used to prepare its financial statements;

          changes in accounting standards, including potential changes relating to how Citi classifies, measures and reports financial instruments, determines impairment on those assets and accounts for hedges, and their impact on Citi's financial condition and results of operations;

          the effectiveness of Citi's loan modification programs (both Citi-instituted programsrisk management processes and the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP)) and their impact on Citi's future results, including delinquency trends, loan loss reserves and net credit losses;strategies;

          the impact that FASB-adopted changes regarding off-balance sheet assets, consolidationexposure of Citi to reputational damage and sale treatment could have on Citi's financial statementssignificant legal and capital ratios;

          the effectivenessregulatory liability as a member of the hedging products used in connection with the Special Asset Pool's trading positions in U.S. subprime RMBS and related products, including ABS CDOs, in the event of material changes in market conditions;financial services industry; and

          the outcomea failure in Citi's operational systems or infrastructure, or those of legal, regulatory, legislative, judicial and other proceedings, both within and outside of the U.S.third parties.

          Table of Contents

          Citigroup Inc.
          FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES

          CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
          AND NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

          TABLE OF CONTENTS


          Page No.

          Financial Statements:CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

            
           

          Consolidated Statement of Income (Unaudited)— For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 20092010 and 20082009

           
          8796
           

          Consolidated Balance Sheet—September 30, 20092010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 20082009

           
          8897
           

          Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited)—Nine Months Ended September 30, 20092010 and 20082009

           
          8999
           

          Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)—Nine Months Ended SeptSeptember 30, 20092010 and 20082009

           
          91101
           

          Citibank Consolidated Balance Sheet—Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries—September 30, 20092010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 20082009

           
          92103

          Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) :NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

            
           

          Note 1—Basis of Presentation

           
          93105
           

          Note 2—Discontinued Operations

           
          99111
           

          Note 3—Business Segments

           
          101114
           

          Note 4—Interest Revenue and Expense

           
          102115
           

          Note 5—Commissions and Fees

           
          103116
           

          Note 6—Retirement BenefitsPrincipal Transactions

           
          104117
           

          Note 7—RestructuringRetirement Benefits and Incentive Plans

           
          105118
           

          Note 8—Earnings Perper Share

           
          108120
           

          Note 9—Trading Account Assets and Liabilities

           
          109121
           

          Note 10—Investments

           
          110122
           

          Note 11—Goodwill and Intangible Assets

           
          120133
           

          Note 12—Debt

           
          122135
           

          Note 13—Preferred Stock


          125

          Note 14—Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

           
          127137
           

          Note 15—14—Securitizations and Variable Interest Entities

           
          128138
           

          Note 16—15—Derivatives Activities


          150

          Note 17—Fair-Value Measurement

           
          158
           

          Note 18—Fair-Value Elections16—Fair Value Measurement

           
          172167
           

          Note 19—17—Fair Value Elections


          182

          Note 18—Fair Value of Financial Instruments

           
          178187

          Note 19—Guarantees


          188
           

          Note 20—GuaranteesContingencies

           
          179193
           

          Note 21—ContingenciesCitibank, N.A. Stockholder's Equity

           
          184194
           

          Note 22—Citibank, N.A. Equity (Unaudited)Subsequent Events

           
          185195
           

          Note 23—Subsequent Events


          186

          Note 24—Condensed Consolidating Financial Statement Schedules

           
          186195

          Table of Contents

          This page intentionally left blank.


          Table of Contents


          CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

          CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME (Unaudited)

          Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

           
           Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30, 
          In millions of dollars, except per share amounts 2009 2008 2009 2008 

          Revenues

                       

          Interest revenue

           $18,678 $26,130 $58,932 $82,628 

          Interest expense

            6,680  12,726  21,179  42,150 
                    

          Net interest revenue

           $11,998 $13,404 $37,753 $40,478 
                    

          Commissions and fees

           $3,218 $3,208 $12,823 $10,348 

          Principal transactions

            1,660  (3,013) 5,763  (15,447)

          Administration and other fiduciary fees

            1,085  2,081  4,163  6,479 

          Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments

            427  150  1,719  376 

          Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investments(1)

                       
           

          Gross impairment losses

            (2,453) (755) (6,161) (1,239)
           

          Less: Impairments recognized in OCI

            1,741    4,006   
                    
           

          Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

           $(712)$(755)$(2,155)$(1,239)
                    

          Insurance premiums

            763  823  2,263  2,513 

          Other revenue

            1,951  360  12,551  2,445 
                    

          Total non-interest revenues

           $8,392 $2,854 $37,127 $5,475 
                    

          Total revenues, net of interest expense

           $20,390 $16,258 $74,880 $45,953 
                    

          Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

                       

          Provision for loan losses

           $8,771 $8,943 $30,919 $21,503 

          Policyholder benefits and claims

            324  274  964  809 

          Provision for unfunded lending commitments

              (150) 195  (293)
                    

          Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

           $9,095 $9,067 $32,078 $22,019 
                    

          Operating expenses

                       

          Compensation and benefits

           $6,136 $7,544 $18,730 $24,798 

          Premises and equipment

            1,035  1,342  3,209  3,983 

          Technology/communication

            1,114  1,515  3,410  4,534 

          Advertising and marketing

            317  496  1,002  1,713 

          Restructuring

            (34) 8  (79) (21)

          Other operating

            3,256  3,102  9,236  9,591 
                    

          Total operating expenses

           $11,824 $14,007 $35,508 $44,598 
                    

          Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

           $(529)$(6,816)$7,294 $(20,664)

          Provision (benefit) for income taxes

            (1,122) (3,295) 620  (9,628)
                    

          Income (loss) from continuing operations

           $593 $(3,521)$6,674 $(11,036)
                    

          Discontinued operations

                       

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations

           $(204)$507 $(635)$898 

          Gain (loss) on sale

              9  2  (508)

          Provision (benefit) for income taxes

            214  (97) 44  (188)
                    

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

           $(418)$613 $(677)$578 
                    

          Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

           $175 $(2,908)$5,997 $(10,458)

          Net Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

            74  (93) 24  (37)
                    

          Citigroup's net income (loss)

           $101 $(2,815)$5,973 $(10,421)
                    

          Basic earnings per share(2)

                       

          Income (loss) from continuing operations

           $(0.23)$(0.72)$(0.10)$(2.28)

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

            (0.04) 0.11  (0.09) 0.11 
                    

          Net income (loss)

           $(0.27)$(0.61)$(0.19)$(2.17)
                    

          Weighted average common shares outstanding

            12,104.3  5,341.8  7,629.6  5,238.3 
                    

          Diluted earnings per share(2)

                       

          Income (loss) from continuing operations

           $(0.23)$(0.72)$(0.10)$(2.28)

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

            (0.04) 0.11  (0.09) 0.11 
                    

          Net income (loss)

           $(0.27)$(0.61)$(0.19)$(2.17)
                    

          Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding

            12,216.0  5,831.1  8,045.7  5,727.9 
                    

          (1)
          For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, OTTI losses on investments are accounted for in accordance ASC 320-10-65-1 (FSP FAS 115-2) (see "Accounting Changes" in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

          (2)
          The Company adopted ASC 260-10-45 to 65 (FSP EITF 03-6-1) on January 1, 2009. All prior periods have been restated to conform to the current presentation. The Diluted EPS calculation for 2009 and 2008 utilizes Basic shares and Income available to common shareholders (Basic) due to the negative Income available to common shareholders. Using actual Diluted shares and Income available to common shareholders (Diluted) would result in anti-dilution.
           
           Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30, 
          In millions of dollars, except per-share amounts 2010 2009 2010 2009 

          Revenues

                       

          Interest revenue

           $19,371 $18,678 $60,641 $58,932 

          Interest expense

            6,125  6,680  18,795  21,179 
                    

          Net interest revenue

           $13,246 $11,998 $41,846 $37,753 
                    

          Commissions and fees

           $3,248 $3,698 $10,122 $11,766 

          Principal transactions

            1,528  1,343  7,898  7,044 

          Administration and other fiduciary fees

            976  1,085  2,908  4,163 

          Realized gains (losses) on sales of investments

            962  427  2,023  1,719 

          Other than temporary impairment losses on investments

                       
           

          Gross impairment losses

            (230) (2,453) (1,237) (6,161)
           

          Less: Impairments recognized in Other comprehensive income (OCI)

            10  1,741  56  4,006 
                    
           

          Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

           $(220)$(712)$(1,181)$(2,155)
                    

          Insurance premiums

           $655 $763 $2,039 $2,263 

          Other revenue

            343  1,788  2,575  12,327 
                    

          Total non-interest revenues

           $7,492 $8,392 $26,384 $37,127 
                    

          Total revenues, net of interest expense

           $20,738 $20,390 $68,230 $74,880 
                    

          Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

                       

          Provision for loan losses

           $5,666 $8,771 $20,555 $30,919 

          Policyholder benefits and claims

            227  324  727  964 

          Provision for unfunded lending commitments

            26    (80) 195 
                    

          Total provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

           $5,919 $9,095 $21,202 $32,078 
                    

          Operating expenses

                       

          Compensation and benefits

           $6,117 $6,136 $18,240 $18,730 

          Premises and equipment

            964  1,035  2,865  3,209 

          Technology/communication

            1,131  1,114  3,278  3,410 

          Advertising and marketing

            458  317  1,127  1,002 

          Restructuring

              (34) (3) (79)

          Other operating

            2,850  3,256  9,397  9,236 
                    

          Total operating expenses

           $11,520 $11,824 $34,904 $35,508 
                    

          Income from continuing operations before income taxes

           $3,299 $(529)$12,124 $7,294 

          Provision for income taxes

            698  (1,122) 2,546  620 
                    

          Income from continuing operations

           $2,601 $593 $9,578 $6,674 
                    

          Discontinued operations

                       

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations

           $8 $(204)$ $(635)

          Gain (loss) on sale

            (784)   (690) 2 

          Provision (benefit) for income taxes

            (402) 214  (524) 44 
                    

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

           $(374)$(418)$(166)$(677)
                    

          Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests

           $2,227 $175 $9,412 $5,997 

          Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

            59  74  119  24 
                    

          Citigroup's net income

           $2,168 $101 $9,293 $5,973 
                    

          Basic earnings per share

                       

          Income (loss) from continuing operations

           $0.09 $(0.23)$0.32 $(0.10)

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

            (0.02) (0.04)   (0.09)
                    

          Net income

           $0.07 $(0.27)$0.32 $(0.19)
                    

          Weighted average common shares outstanding

            28,877.5  12,104.3  28,723.7  7,629.6 
                    

          Diluted earnings per share

                       

          Income (loss) from continuing operations

           $0.08 $(0.23)$0.32 $(0.10)

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

            (0.01) (0.04) (0.01) (0.09)
                    

          Net income

           $0.07 $(0.27)$0.31 $(0.19)
                    

          Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding

            29,778.3  12,216.0  29,621.5  8,045.7 
                    

          See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


          Table of Contents

          CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

          CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

          Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

          In millions of dollars, except shares September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           
           
           (Unaudited)
            
           

          Assets

                 

          Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits)

           $26,342 $25,472 

          Deposits with banks

            150,071  167,414 

          Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (including $94,190 and $87,812 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

            240,057  222,022 

          Brokerage receivables

            37,138  33,634 

          Trading account assets (including $122,318 and $111,219 pledged to creditors at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)

            337,098  342,773 

          Investments (including $12,835 and $15,154 pledged to creditors at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively and $302,109 and $246,429 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

            340,250  306,119 

          Loans, net of unearned income

                 
           

          Consumer (including $2,400 and $34 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

            463,104  424,057 
           

          Corporate (including $2,755 and $1,405 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

            191,207  167,447 
                

          Loans, net of unearned income

           $654,311 $591,504 
           

          Allowance for loan losses

            (43,674) (36,033)
                

          Total loans, net

           $610,637 $555,471 

          Goodwill

            25,797  25,392 

          Intangible assets (other than MSRs)

            7,705  8,714 

          Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)

            3,976  6,530 

          Other assets (including $22,918 and $12,664 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

            172,800  163,105 

          Assets of discontinued operations held for sale

            31,409   
                

          Total assets

           $1,983,280 $1,856,646 
                

                  The following table presents certain assets of consolidated variable interest entities (VIEs), which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The assets in the table below include only those assets that can be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs on the following page, and are in excess of those obligations.

           
           September 30, 2010 

          Assets of consolidated VIEs that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs

              

          Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits)

           $2,316 

          Trading account assets

            4,959 

          Investments

            9,476 

          Loans, net of unearned income

              
           

          Consumer (including $2,372 at fair value)

            112,988 
           

          Corporate (including $648 at fair value)

            23,536 
              

          Loans, net of unearned income

           $136,524 
           

          Allowance for loan losses

            (12,007)
              

          Total loans, net

           $124,517 

          Other assets(1)

            33,112 
              

          Total assets of consolidated VIEs that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs

           $174,380 
              

          (1)
          Other assetsincludesAssets of discontinued operations held for saleof $31.4 billion relating to the announced sale of The Student Loan Corporation.

          Table of Contents

          CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

          CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
          (Continued)

          Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

          In millions of dollars, except shares September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           
           
           (Unaudited)
            
           

          Liabilities

                 

          Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices

           $64,442 $71,325 

          Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices (including $614 and $700 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

            237,626  232,093 

          Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. 

            52,080  44,904 

          Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. (including $556 and $845 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

            495,947  487,581 
                

          Total deposits

           $850,095 $835,903 

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (including $119,984 and $104,030 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

            192,065  154,281 

          Brokerage payables

            51,517  60,846 

          Trading account liabilities

            142,005  137,512 

          Short-term borrowings (including $2,494 and $639 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

            87,013  68,879 

          Long-term debt (including $26,640 and $25,942 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

            387,330  364,019 

          Other liabilities (including $11,287 and $11,542 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, at fair value)

            78,198  80,233 

          Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale

            29,874   
                

          Total liabilities

           $1,818,097 $1,701,673 
                

          Stockholders' equity

                 

          Preferred stock ($1.00 par value; authorized shares: 30 million), issued shares:12,038 at September 30, 2010, at aggregate liquidation value

           $312 $312 

          Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized shares: 60 billion), issued shares:29,223,928,169 at September 30, 2010 and 28,626,100,389 at December 31, 2009

            292  286 

          Additional paid-in capital

            100,898  98,142 

          Retained earnings

            78,260  77,440 

          Treasury stock, at cost:September 30, 2010—174,327,274 shares and December 31, 2009—142,833,099 shares

            (1,540) (4,543)

          Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

            (15,309) (18,937)
                

          Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

           $162,913 $152,700 

          Noncontrolling interest

            2,270  2,273 
                

          Total equity

           $165,183 $154,973 
                

          Total liabilities and equity

           $1,983,280 $1,856,646 
                

          See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


                  The following table presents certain liabilities of consolidated VIEs, which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The liabilities in the table below include third-party liabilities of consolidated VIEs only, and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. The liabilities also exclude amounts where creditors or beneficial interest holders have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup.

           
           September 30, 2010 

          Liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup:

              

          Short-term borrowings

           $32,162 

          Long-term debt (including $4,793 at fair value)

            69,639 

          Other liabilities(1)

            31,908 
              

          Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup

           $133,709 
              

          (1)
          Other liabilitiesincludesLiabilities of discontinued operations held for saleof $29.9 billion, relating to the announced sale of The Student Loan Corporation.

          Table of Contents

          CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)

          Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

           
           Nine Months Ended September 30, 
          In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands 2010 2009 

          Preferred stock at aggregate liquidation value

                 

          Balance, beginning of period

           $312 $70,664 

          Issuance of new preferred stock

              3,653 

          Conversion of preferred stock

              (74,005)
                

          Balance, end of period

           $312 $312 
                

          Common stock and additional paid-in capital

                 

          Balance, beginning of period

           $98,428 $19,222 

          Employee benefit plans(1)

            (834) (3,508)

          Issuance of Common Stock

              173 

          Issuance of TARP-related warrants

              88 

          Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price

              1,285 

          Conversion of preferred stock to common stock

              61,790 

          ADIA Upper Decs Equity Units Purchase Contract

            3,750��  

          Other

            (154) (18)
                

          Balance, end of period

           $101,190 $79,032 
                

          Retained earnings

                 

          Balance, beginning of period

           $77,440 $86,521 

          Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(2)(3)

            (8,483) 413 
                

          Adjusted balance, beginning of period

           $68,957 $86,934 

          Citigroup's net income

            9,293  5,973 

          Common dividends(4)

            10  (34)

          Preferred dividends

              (3,201)

          Preferred stock Series H discount accretion

              (124)

          Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price

              (1,285)

          Convestion of preferred stock

               (3,055)
                

          Balance, end of period

           $78,260 $85,208 
                

          Treasury stock, at cost

                 

          Balance, beginning of period

           $(4,543)$(9,582)

          Issuance of shares pursuant to employee benefit plans

            3,007  3,505 

          Treasury stock acquired(5)

            (5) (3)

          Other

            1  21 
                

          Balance, end of period

           $(1,540)$(6,059)
                

          Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

                 

          Balance, beginning of period

           $(18,937)$(25,195)

          Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(2)

              (413)
                

          Adjusted balance, beginning of period

           $(18,937)$(25,608)

          Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of taxes

            3,350  5,818 

          Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes

            (123) 1,012 

          Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes

            440  1,131 

          Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes

            (39) (4)
                

          Net change inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

           $3,628 $7,957 
                

          Balance, end of period

           $(15,309)$(17,651)
                

          Total Citigroup common stockholders' equity (shares outstanding: 29,049,601 at September 30, 2010 and 28,483,267 at December 31, 2009)

           $162,601 $140,530 
                

          Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

           $162,913 $140,842 
                

          [Statement continues on the following page, including notes to table]


          Table of Contents

          CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

          CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSTATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited)
          (Continued)

          Citigroup Inc. and Subsidiaries

          In millions of dollars, except shares September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
           
           
           (Unaudited)
            
           

          Assets

                 

          Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits)

           $26,482 $29,253 

          Deposits with banks

            217,730  170,331 

          Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell (including $87,886 and $70,305 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

            197,357  184,133 

          Brokerage receivables

            34,667  44,278 

          Trading account assets (including $128,154 and $148,703 pledged to creditors at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)

            340,697  377,635 

          Investments (including $18,413 and $14,875 pledged to creditors at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)

            261,890  256,020 

          Loans, net of unearned income

                 
           

          Consumer (including $30 and $36 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

            441,491  481,387 
           

          Corporate (including $1,475 and $2,696 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

            180,720  212,829 
                

          Loans, net of unearned income

           $622,211 $694,216 
           

          Allowance for loan losses

            (36,416) (29,616)
                

          Total loans, net

           $585,795 $664,600 

          Goodwill

            25,423  27,132 

          Intangible assets (other than MSRs)

            8,957  14,159 

          Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs)

            6,228  5,657 

          Other assets (including $13,670 and $21,372 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 respectively, at fair value)

            159,769  165,272 

          Assets of discontinued operations held for sale

            23,604   
                

          Total assets

           $1,888,599 $1,938,470 
                

          Liabilities

                 

          Deposits

                 
           

          Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices

           $77,460 $55,485 
           

          Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices (including $919 and $1,335 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

            244,856  234,491 
                

          Total U.S. deposits

           $322,316 $289,976 
           

          Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. 

            40,606  37,412 
           

          Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S. (including $1,110 and $1,271 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

            469,681  446,797 
                

          Total international deposits

           $510,287 $484,209 
                

          Total deposits

           $832,603 $774,185 

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase (including $116,693 and $138,866 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

            178,159  205,293 

          Brokerage payables

            57,672  70,916 

          Trading account liabilities

            130,540  165,800 

          Short-term borrowings (including $1,443 and $17,607 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

            64,731  126,691 

          Long-term debt (including $27,186 and $27,263 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

            379,557  359,593 

          Other liabilities (including $14,819 and $11,889 as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, at fair value)

            86,384  91,970 

          Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale

            16,004   
                

          Total liabilities

           $1,745,650 $1,794,448 
                

          Citigroup stockholders' equity

                 

          Preferred stock ($1.00 par value; authorized shares: 30 million), issued shares:12,038 at September 30, 2009, at aggregate liquidation value

           $312 $70,664 

          Common stock ($0.01 par value; authorized shares: 60 billion), issued shares:23,044,331,654 and 5,671,743,807 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. 

            230  57 

          Additional paid-in capital

            78,802  19,165 

          Retained earnings

            85,208  86,521 

          Treasury stock, at cost:September 30, 2009—180,384,393 shares and December 31, 2008—221,675,719 shares

            (6,059) (9,582)

          Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

            (17,651) (25,195)
                

          Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

           $140,842 $141,630 

          Noncontrolling interest

            2,107  2,392 
                

          Total equity

           $142,949 $144,022 
                

          Total liabilities and equity

           $1,888,599 $1,938,470 
                
           
           Nine Months Ended September 30, 
          In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands 2010 2009 

          Noncontrolling interest

                 

          Balance, beginning of period

           $2,273 $2,392 
           

          Origination of a noncontrolling interest

            287  124 
           

          Transactions between noncontrolling interest shareholders and the related consolidating subsidiary

              (134)
           

          Transactions between Citigroup and the noncontrolling-interest shareholders

            (308) (350)
           

          Net income attributable to noncontrolling-interest shareholders

            119  24 
           

          Dividends paid to noncontrolling—interest shareholders

            (99) (16)
           

          Accumulated other comprehensive income—net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of tax

            6  7 
           

          Accumulated other comprehensive income—net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax

            (20) 31 
           

          All other

            12  29 
                

          Net change in noncontrolling interests

           $(3)$(285)
                

          Balance, end of period

           $2,270 $2,107 
                

          Total equity

           $165,183 $142,949 
                

          Comprehensive income (loss)

                 

          Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests

           $9,412 $5,997 

          Net change inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

            3,614  7,995 
                

          Total comprehensive income

           $13,026 $13,992 
                

          Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interests

           $105 $62 
                

          Comprehensive income attributable to Citigroup

           $12,921 $13,930 
                

          See Notes


          (1)
          Includes unearned compensation on stock awards as well as the issuance in the second quarter of 2010 stock related to the "Common Stock Equivalents" (CSEs). For more information on the CSEs, see Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


          Table of Contents

          CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (Unaudited)

           
           Nine Months Ended September 30, 
          In millions of dollars, except shares in thousands 2009 2008 

          Preferred stock at aggregate liquidation value

                 
           

          Balance, beginning of period

           $70,664 $ 
           

          Issuance of preferred stock

            3,653  27,424 
           

          Conversion of preferred stock

            (74,005)  
                

          Balance, end of period

           $312 $27,424 
                

          Common stock and additional paid-in capital

                 
           

          Balance, beginning of period

           $19,222 $18,062 
           

          Employee benefit plans

            (3,508) (2,405)
           

          Issuance of Common stock

            173  4,911 
           

          Issuance of shares for Nikko Cordial acquisition

              (3,500)
           

          Issuance of TARP-related warrants

            88   
           

          Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price

            1,285   
           

          Conversion of preferred stock to common stock

            61,790   
           

          Other

            (18) (127)
                

          Balance, end of period

           $79,032 $16,941 
               ��

          Retained earnings

                 

          Balance, beginning of period

           $86,521 $121,769 
           

          Adjustment to opening balance, net of tax(1)

            413   
                
           

          Adjusted balance, beginning of period

           $86,934 $121,769 
           

          Net income (loss)

            5,973  (10,421)
           

          Common dividends(2)

            (34) (5,175)
           

          Preferred dividends

            (3,201) (833)
           

          Preferred stock Series H discount accretion

            (124)  
           

          Reset of convertible preferred stock conversion price

            (1,285)  
           

          Conversion of Preferred stock

            (3,055)  
                

          Balance, end of period

           $85,208 $105,340 
                

          Treasury stock, at cost

                 

          Balance, beginning of period

           $(9,582)$(21,724)
           

          Issuance of shares pursuant to employee benefit plans

            3,505  4,210 
           

          Treasury stock acquired(3)

            (3) (7)
           

          Issuance of shares for Nikko Cordial acquisition

              7,858 
           

          Other

            21  21 
                

          Balance, end of period

           $(6,059)$(9,642)
                

          Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

                 

          Balance, beginning of period

           $(25,195)$(4,660)
           

          Adjustment to opening balance, net of tax(1)

            (413)  
                
           

          Adjusted balance, beginning of period

           $(25,608)$(4,660)
           

          Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of tax

            5,818  (6,657)
           

          Net change in cash flow hedges, net of tax

            1,012  (312)
           

          Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax

            1,131  (2,419)
           

          Pension liability adjustment, net of tax

            (4) 47 
                
           

          Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

           $7,957 $(9,341)
                

          Balance, end of period

           $(17,651)$(14,001)
                

          Total Citigroup common stockholders' equity (shares outstanding: 22,863,947 at September 30, 2009 and 5,450,068 at December 31, 2008)

           $140,530 $98,638 
                

          Total Citigroup stockholders' equity

           $140,842 $126,062 
                

          Noncontrolling interests

                 

          Balance, beginning of period

           $2,392 $5,308 
           

          Initial origination of a noncontrolling interest

            124  1,409 
           

          Transactions between noncontrolling interest shareholders and the related consolidating subsidiary

            (134) (2,347)
           

          Transactions between Citigroup and the noncontrolling interest shareholders

            (350) (836)
           

          Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest shareholders

            24  (37)
           

          Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest shareholders

            (16) (136)
           

          Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investments securities, net of tax

            7  3 
           

          Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax

            31  6 
           

          All other

            29  92 
                

          Net change in noncontrolling interests

           $(285)$(1,846)
                

          Balance, end of period

           $2,107 $3,462 
                

          Total equity

           $142,949 $129,524 
                

          Table of Contents

          Comprehensive income (loss)

                 
           

          Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

           $5,997 $(10,458)
           

          Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

            7,995  (9,332)
                

          Total comprehensive income (loss)

           $13,992 $(19,790)

          Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest

            62  (28)
                

          Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Citigroup

           $13,930 $(19,762)
                

          (1)(2)
          The adjustment to the opening balances forRetained earnings andAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in 2009 represents the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASC 320-10-65-1 (FSP320-10-35-34,Investments—Debt and Equity securities: Recognition of an Other-Than-Temporary Impairment (formerly FSP FAS 115-2)115-2 and FAS 124-2). See Note 1

          (3)
          The adjustment to the Consolidated Financial Statementsopening balance for further disclosure.Retained earnings in 2010 represents the cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 167 on January 1, 2010, now incorporated into ASC 810,Consolidation as well as the adoption of ASU 2010-11 on July 1, 2010. The cumulative effect of these adjustments on retained earnings was $8.4 billion and $41 million respectively.

          (2)(4)
          Common dividends in 2010 represent a reversal of dividends accrued on forfeitures of previously issued but unvested employee stock awards related to employees who have left Citigroup. Common dividends declared were as follows: $0.01 per share in the first quarter of 2009 and $0.32 per share in the first, second and third quarters of 2008.2009.

          (3)(5)
          All open market repurchases were transacted under an existing authorized share repurchase plan and relate to customer fails/errors.

          See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements


          Table of Contents

          CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

          CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)



           Nine Months Ended September 30, 
           Nine Months Ended September 30, 
          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars 2009 2008 In millions of dollars 2010 2009 

          Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations

          Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations

           

          Cash flows from operating activities of continuing operations

           

          Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

           $5,997 $(10,458)

          Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

           24 (37)

          Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests

          Net income before attribution of noncontrolling interests

           $9,412 $5,997 

          Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

          Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

           119 24 
                     

          Citigroup's net income (loss)

           $5,973 $(10,421)

          Citigroup's net income

          Citigroup's net income

           $9,293 $5,973 

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

           (679) 882 

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

           148 (679)

          Gain (loss) on sale, net of taxes

           2 (304)

          (Loss) gain on sale, net of taxes

           (314) 2 
                     

          Income (loss) from continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests

           $6,650 $(10,999)

          Income from continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests

           $9,459 $6,650 

          Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations

           

          Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests

          Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests

           

          Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits

           298 252 

          Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and present value of future profits

           229 298 

          Additions to deferred policy acquisition costs

           (354) (311)

          Additions to deferred policy acquisition costs

           1,925 (354)

          Depreciation and amortization

           1,290 1,953 

          Depreciation and amortization

           1,379 1,290 

          Provision for credit losses

           31,114 21,210 

          Provision for credit losses

           20,475 31,114 

          Change in trading account assets

           28,355 81,930 

          Change in trading account assets

           (4,225) 28,355 

          Change in trading account liabilities

           (32,437) (12,799)

          Change in trading account liabilities

           4,493 (32,437)

          Change in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

           (19,061) 48,657 

          Change in federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

           (18,035) (19,061)

          Change in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

           (24,008) (53,824)

          Change in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

           37,784 (24,008)

          Change in brokerage receivables net of brokerage payables

           (2,360) 9,412 

          Change in brokerage receivables net of brokerage payables

           (12,833) (2,360)

          Net losses (gains) from sales of investments

           (1,719) 863 

          Net gains from sales of investments

           (2,023) (1,719)

          Change in loans held-for-sale

           (1,605) 22,398 

          Change in loans held-for-sale

           (3,331) (1,605)

          Other, net

           3 (9,796)

          Other, net

           (11,016) 315 
                     

          Total adjustments

          Total adjustments

           $(20,484)$109,945 

          Total adjustments

           $14,822 $(20,172)
                     

          Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations

           $(13,834)$98,946 

          Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests

          Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations—excluding noncontrolling interests

           $24,281 $(13,522)
                     

          Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations

          Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations

           

          Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations

           

          Change in deposits at interest with banks

           $(47,797)$(9,326)

          Change in deposits with banks

          Change in deposits with banks

           $17,343 $(47,797)

          Change in loans

          Change in loans

           (127,661) (187,859)

          Change in loans

           56,415 (127,661)

          Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

          Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

           185,442 203,863 

          Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

           7,270 185,442 

          Purchases of investments

          Purchases of investments

           (167,115) (272,815)

          Purchases of investments

           (334,368) (167,115)

          Proceeds from sales of investments

          Proceeds from sales of investments

           66,890 60,255 

          Proceeds from sales of investments

           129,471 66,890 

          Proceeds from maturities of investments

          Proceeds from maturities of investments

           90,218 194,312 

          Proceeds from maturities of investments

           153,669 90,218 

          Capital expenditures on premises and equipment

          Capital expenditures on premises and equipment

           (859) (2,111)

          Capital expenditures on premises and equipment

           (805) (859)

          Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates, and repossessed assets

          Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates, and repossessed assets

           5,590 15,644 

          Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment, subsidiaries and affiliates, and repossessed assets

           1,656 5,590 
                     

          Net cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations

          Net cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations

           $4,708 $1,963 

          Net cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations

           $30,651 $4,708 
                     

          Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations

          Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations

           

          Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations

           

          Dividends paid

          Dividends paid

           $(3,235)$(6,008)

          Dividends paid

           $ $(3,235)

          Issuance of common stock

            4,961 

          Issuance (redemptions) of preferred stock

            27,424 

          Issuance of ADIA Upper Decs equity units purchase contract

          Issuance of ADIA Upper Decs equity units purchase contract

           3,750  

          Treasury stock acquired

          Treasury stock acquired

           (3) (7)

          Treasury stock acquired

           (5) (3)

          Stock tendered for payment of withholding taxes

          Stock tendered for payment of withholding taxes

           (116) (377)

          Stock tendered for payment of withholding taxes

           (786) (116)

          Issuance of long-term debt

          Issuance of long-term debt

           90,464 67,311 

          Issuance of long-term debt

           22,072 90,464 

          Payments and redemptions of long-term debt

          Payments and redemptions of long-term debt

           (83,850) (94,073)

          Payments and redemptions of long-term debt

           (56,839) (83,850)

          Change in deposits

          Change in deposits

           58,418 (32,411)

          Change in deposits

           14,192 58,418 

          Change in short-term borrowings

          Change in short-term borrowings

           (56,143) (41,633)

          Change in short-term borrowings

           (37,121) (56,143)
                     

          Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities of continuing operations

          Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities of continuing operations

           $5,535 $(74,813)

          Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities of continuing operations

           $(54,737)$5,535 
                     

          Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

          Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

           $582 $(1,105)

          Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

           624 582 
                     

          Net cash from discontinued operations

          Net cash from discontinued operations

           $238 $(171)

          Net cash from discontinued operations

           51 (74)
                     

          Change in cash and due from banks

          Change in cash and due from banks

           $(2,771)$24,820 

          Change in cash and due from banks

           $870 $(2,771)

          Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

          Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

           $29,253 $38,206 

          Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

           25,472 29,253 
                     

          Cash and due from banks at end of period

          Cash and due from banks at end of period

           $26,482 $63,026 

          Cash and due from banks at end of period

           $26,342 $26,482 
                     

          Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations

          Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations

           

          Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information for continuing operations

           

          Cash (received)paid during the period for income taxes

           $(1,251)$2,123 

          Cash paid during the period for income taxes

          Cash paid during the period for income taxes

           $3,392 $(1,251)

          Cash paid during the period for interest

          Cash paid during the period for interest

           $21,338 $44,294 

          Cash paid during the period for interest

           $17,289 $21,338 
                     

          Non-cash investing activities

          Non-cash investing activities

           

          Non-cash investing activities

           

          Transfers to repossessed assets

          Transfers to repossessed assets

           $2,149 $2,574 

          Transfers to repossessed assets

           $2,058 $2,149 
                     

          See Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.


          Table of Contents

          This page intentionally left blank.


          Table of Contents

          CITIBANK, N.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

          CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

           
           Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries
           
          In millions of dollars, except shares September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           
           
           (Unaudited)
            
           

          Assets

                 

          Cash and due from banks

           $21,533 $20,246 

          Deposits with banks

            137,194  154,372 

          Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

            40,526  31,434 

          Trading account assets (including $504 and $914 pledged to creditors at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)

            164,408  156,380 

          Investments (including $3,625 and $3,849 pledged to creditors at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)

            272,081  233,086 

          Loans, net of unearned income

            446,325  477,974 

          Allowance for loan losses

            (19,951) (22,685)
                

          Total loans, net

           $426,374 $455,289 

          Goodwill

            10,212  10,200 

          Intangible assets, including MSRs

            5,310  8,243 

          Premises and equipment, net

            4,580  4,832 

          Interest and fees receivable

            6,510  6,840 

          Other assets

            89,084  80,439 

          Assets of discontinued operations held for sale

            31,409   
                

          Total assets

           $1,209,221 $1,161,361 
                

                  The following table presents certain assets of consolidated VIEs, which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The assets in the table below include only those assets that can be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs on the following page, and are in excess of those obligations.

           
           September 30, 2010 

          Assets of consolidated VIEs that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs

              

          Cash and due from banks (including segregated cash and other deposits)

           $1,828 

          Trading account assets

            96 

          Investments

            8,695 

          Loans, net of unearned income

              
           

          Consumer (including $2,372 at fair value)

            9,891 
           

          Corporate (including $362 at fair value)

            22,977 
              

          Loans, net of unearned income

           $32,868 
           

          Allowance for loan losses

            (86)
              

          Total loans, net

           $32,782 

          Other assets(1)

            32,004 
              

          Total assets of consolidated VIEs that can only be used to settle obligations of consolidated VIEs

           $75,405 
              

          [Statement continues on the following page]


          Table of Contents

          CITIBANK, N.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES

          CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
          (Continued)


           Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries
            Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries
           
          In millions of dollars, except shares September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
            September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           

           (Unaudited)
            
           

          Assets

           

          Cash and due from banks

           $21,016 $22,107 

          Deposits with banks

           207,082 156,774 

          Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell

           16,396 41,613 

          Trading account assets (including $9,539 and $12,092 pledged to creditors at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)

           163,542 197,052 

          Investments (including $2,633 and $3,028 pledged to creditors at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively)

           187,406 165,914 

          Loans, net of unearned income

           507,629 555,198 

          Allowance for loan losses

           (23,299) (18,273)
               

          Total loans, net

           $484,330 $536,925 

          Goodwill

           10,210 10,148 

          Intangible assets

           8,010 7,689 

          Premises and equipment, net

           4,954 5,331 

          Interest and fees receivable

           6,740 7,171 

          Other assets

           77,068 76,316 
               

          Total assets

           $1,186,754 $1,227,040 
                (Unaudited)
            
           

          Liabilities

            

          Non-interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices

           $80,425 $55,223  $72,577 $76,729 

          Interest-bearing deposits in U.S. offices

           188,803 185,322  183,823 176,149 

          Non-interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S.

           39,403 33,769  47,550 39,414 

          Interest-bearing deposits in offices outside the U.S.

           477,170 480,984  493,401 479,350 
                    

          Total deposits

           $785,801 $755,298  $797,351 $771,642 

          Trading account liabilities

           56,917 108,921  66,922 52,010 

          Purchased funds and other borrowings

           88,889 116,333  72,984 89,503 

          Accrued taxes and other expenses

           9,347 8,192  8,942 9,046 

          Long-term debt and subordinated notes

           85,573 113,381  60,596 82,086 

          Other liabilities

           44,508 42,475  45,224 39,181 

          Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale

           29,874  
                    

          Total liabilities

           $1,071,035 $1,144,600  $1,081,893 $1,043,468 
                    

          Citibank stockholder's equity

            

          Capital stock ($20 par value) outstanding shares: 37,534,553 in each period

           $751 $751  $751 $751 

          Surplus

           105,293 74,767  109,166 107,923 

          Retained earnings

           19,988 21,735  25,597 19,457 

          Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1)

           (11,415) (15,895) (9,255) (11,532)
                    

          Total Citibank stockholder's equity

           $114,617 $81,358  $126,259 $116,599 

          Noncontrolling interest

           1,102 1,082  1,069 1,294 
                    

          Total equity

           $115,719 $82,440  $127,328 $117,893 
                    

          Total liabilities and equity

           $1,186,754 $1,227,040  $1,209,221 $1,161,361 
                    

          (1)
          Amounts at September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 20082009 include the after-tax amounts for net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities of ($4.653)$(2.498) billion and ($8.008)$(4.735) billion, respectively, for FXforeign currency translation of ($3.114)$(3.389) billion and ($3.964)$(3.255) billion, respectively, for cash flow hedges of ($2.965)$(2.224) billion and ($3.247)$(2.367) billion, respectively, and for pension liability adjustments of ($683) million$(1.144) billion and ($676) million,$(1.175) billion, respectively.

          See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


                  The following table presents certain liabilities of consolidated VIEs, which are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet above. The liabilities in the table below include third-party liabilities of consolidated VIEs only, and exclude intercompany balances that eliminate in consolidation. The liabilities also exclude amounts where creditors or beneficial interest holders have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup.

           
           September 30, 2010 

          Liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup:

              

          Short-term borrowings

           $29,313 

          Long-term debt (including $2,557 at fair value)

            5,901 

          Other liabilities(1)

            31,148 
              

          Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs for which creditors or beneficial interest holders do not have recourse to the general credit of Citigroup

           $66,362 
              

          Table of Contents

          CITIGROUP INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

          NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

          1.    BASIS OF PRESENTATION

                  The accompanying Unauditedunaudited Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 20092010 and for the three- and nine-month periodsperiod ended September 30, 20092010 include the accounts of Citigroup Inc. (Citigroup) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation have been reflected. The accompanying Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, Citigroup's updated 2009 historical financial statements and notes filed on Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on June 25, 2010 and Citigroup's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010.

                  Certain financial information that is normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, but is not required for interim reporting purposes, has been condensed or omitted.

                  Management must make estimates and assumptions that affect the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related footnote disclosures. While management makes its best judgment, actual results could differ from those estimates. Current market conditions increase the risk and complexity of the judgments in these estimates.

                  Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior-period's financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation.

                  As noted above, the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are unaudited.

          FASB Launches Accounting Standards Codification

                  The FASB has issued FASB Statement No. 168,The "FASB Accounting Standards Codification™" and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (ASC 105). The Statement establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification™ (Codification or ASC) as the single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other nongrandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification have become nonauthoritative.Citibank, N.A.

                  Following the Codification, the Board will not issue new standardsCitibank, N.A. is a commercial bank and wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup Inc. Citibank's principal offerings include consumer finance, mortgage lending, and retail banking products and services; investment banking, commercial banking, cash management, trade finance and e-commerce products and services; and private banking products and services.

                  The Company includes a balance sheet and statement of changes in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates (ASU), which will servestockholder's equity for Citibank, N.A. to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidancethis entity to shareholders of Citigroup and provide the basis for conclusions on the changesinternational regulatory agencies (see Note 21 to the Codification.

                  GAAP is not intended to be changed as a result of the FASB's Codification project, but what does change is the way the guidance is organized and presented. As a result, these changes have a significant impact on how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in their accounting policiesConsolidated Financial Statements for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. Citigroup is providing references to the Codification topics alongside references to the existing standards.further information).

          Significant Accounting Policies

                  The Company's accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management's discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition. The Company has identified six policies as being significant because they require management to make subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain. These policies relate to Valuations of Financial Instruments, Allowance for Credit Losses, Securitizations, Goodwill, Income Taxes and Legal Reserves. The Company, in consultation with the Audit and Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors, has reviewed and approved these significant accounting policies, which are further described in the Company's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

                  A detailed discussion of the Company's accounting policies is included in Citigroup's updated 2009 historical financial statements and notes filed on Form 8-K with the SEC on June 25, 2010.

          ACCOUNTING CHANGESPrinciples of Consolidation

          Interim Disclosures about Fair Value        The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Financial Instruments

                  In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, "Interim Disclosures about Fair ValueCompany. The Company consolidates subsidiaries in which it holds, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of Financial Instruments," (ASC 825-10-65-1). This FSP requires disclosing qualitative and quantitative information aboutthe voting rights or where it exercises control. Entities where the Company holds 20% to 50% of the voting rights and/or has the ability to exercise significant influence, other than investments of designated venture capital subsidiaries, or investments accounted for at fair value under the fair value option, are accounted for under the equity method, and the pro rata share of all financial instrumentstheir income (loss) is included inOther revenue. Income from investments in less than 20%-owned companies is recognized when dividends are received. As discussed below, Citigroup consolidates entities deemed to be variable interest entities when Citigroup is determined to be the primary beneficiary. Gains and losses on a quarterly basis, including methodsthe disposition of branches, subsidiaries, affiliates, buildings, and significant assumptions used toother investments and charges for management's estimate fairof impairment in their value during the period. These disclosures were previously only done annually. The disclosures required by this FSP were effective for the quarter ended June 30, 2009. This FSP has no effect on how Citigroup accounts for these instruments.

          Other-Than-Temporary Impairments on Investment Securities

                  In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, "Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments" (ASC 320-10-65-1/FSP FAS 115-2), which amends the recognition guidance for other-than-temporary impairments (OTTI) of debt securities and expands the financial statement disclosures for OTTI on debt and equity securities. Citigroup adopted the FSP in the first quarter of 2009.

                  As a result of the FSP, the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income reflects the full impairment (thatthat is the difference between the security's amortized cost basis and fair value) on debt securitiesother than temporary, such that the Company intends to sell or would more-likely-than-not be required to sell before the expected recovery of the amortized cost basis. For available-for-sale (AFS) and held-to-maturity (HTM) debt securities that management has no intent to sell and believes that it more-likely-than-not will not be required to sell prior to recovery,carrying amount is deemed unlikely, are included inOther revenue.


          Table of Contents

          onlyACCOUNTING CHANGES

          Change in Accounting for Embedded Credit Derivatives

                  In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-11,Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives. The ASU clarifies that certain embedded derivatives, such as those contained in certain securitizations, CDOs and structured notes, should be considered embedded credit loss componentderivatives subject to potential bifurcation and separate fair value accounting. The ASU allows any beneficial interest issued by a securitization vehicle to be accounted for under the fair value option at transition on July 1, 2010.

                  The Company has elected to account for the following beneficial interests issued by securitization vehicles under the fair value option. Beneficial interests previously classified as held-to-maturity (HTM) were reclassified to available-for-sale (AFS) on June 30, 2010, because as of that reporting date, the Company did not have the intent to hold the beneficial interests until maturity.

                  The following table also shows the gross gains and gross losses that make up the pre-tax cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings for reclassified beneficial interests, recorded on July 1, 2010:

           
            
           July 1, 2010  
           
           
            
           Pre-tax Cumulative effect adjustment to Retained earnings  
           
          In millions of dollars at June 30, 2010 Amortized cost Gross unrealized losses
          recognized in AOCI(1)
           Gross unrealized gains
          recognized in AOCI
           Fair Value 

          Mortgage-backed securities

                       
           

          Prime

           $390 $ $49 $439 
           

          Alt-A

            550    54  604 
           

          Subprime

            221    6  227 
           

          Non-U.S. residential

            2,249    38  2,287 
                    
           

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           $3,410 $ $147 $3,557 
                    

          Asset-backed securities

                       
           

          Auction rate securities

           $4,463 $401 $48 $4,110 
           

          Other asset-backed

            4,189  19  164  4,334 
                    

          Total asset-backed securities

           $8,652 $420 $212 $8,444 
                    

          Total reclassified debt securities

           $12,062 $420 $359 $12,001 
                    

          (1)
          All reclassified debt securities with gross unrealized losses were assessed for other-than-temporary-impairment as of June 30, 2010, including an assessment of whether the Company intends to sell the security. For securities that the Company intends to sell, impairment is recognizedcharges of $176 million were recorded in earnings whilein the restsecond quarter of 2010.

                  Beginning July 1, 2010, the Company elected to account for these beneficial interests under the fair value option for various reasons, including:

            To reduce the operational burden of assessing beneficial interests for bifurcation under the guidance in the ASU;

            Where bifurcation would otherwise be required under the ASU, to avoid the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivatives from the host contracts and accounting for each separately. The Company reclassified substantially all beneficial interests where bifurcation would otherwise be required under the ASU; and

            To permit more economic hedging strategies without generating volatility in reported earnings.

          Additional Disclosures Regarding Fair Value Measurements

                  In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06,Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. The ASU requires disclosing the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value loss is recognizedhierarchy and describing the reasons for the transfers. The disclosures are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The Company adopted ASU 2010-06 as of January 1, 2010. The required disclosures are included inAccumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The credit loss component recognized in earnings is identified as the amount of principal cash flows not expected to be received over the remaining term Note 16. Additionally, disclosures of the security as projected using the Company's cash flow projections using its base assumptions. As a resultgross purchases, sales, issuances and settlements activity in Level 3 of the adoptionfair value measurement hierarchy will be required for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010.


          Table of the FSP, Citigroup's incomeContents

          Elimination of Qualifying Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs) and Changes in the first quarter of 2009 was higher by $631 million on a pretax basis ($391 million on an after-tax basis), respectively.Consolidation Model for VIEs

                  The cumulative effect of the change included an increase in the opening balance ofRetained earnings at January 1, 2009 of $665 million on a pretax basis ($413 million after-tax).

                  See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Investments, for disclosures related to the Company's investment securities and OTTI.

          Measurement of Fair Value in Inactive Markets

          In AprilJune 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-4, "Determining Fair Value When the VolumeSFAS No. 166,Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (SFAS 166, now incorporated into ASC Topic 860) and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly DecreasedSFAS No. 167,Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167, now incorporated into ASC Topic 810). Citigroup adopted both standards on January 1, 2010. Citigroup has elected to apply SFAS 166 and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly" (ASC 820-10-65-4). The FSP reaffirms that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The FSP also reaffirms the need to use judgment in determining whether a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when the market has become inactive. The adoption of the FSP had no effect on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

          Measuring Liabilities at Fair ValueSFAS 167 prospectively. Accordingly, prior periods have not been restated.

                  In August 2009, the FASB issued ASU No. 2009-05,Fair Value Measurements and Disclosure (Topic 820): Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value. This ASU provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using one or more of the following techniques:

            1.
            A valuation technique that uses quoted prices for similar liabilities (or an identical liability) when traded as assets.

            2.
            Another valuation technique that is consistent with the principles of Topic 820.

                  This ASU also clarifies that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments        SFAS 166 eliminates QSPEs. SFAS 167 details three key changes to the quoted price of the asset are required, are Level 1 fair value measurements.

                  This ASU is effective immediately and does not have a material impact to Citigroup.

          Revisions to the Earnings per Share Calculation

                  In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities" (ASC 260-10-45 to 65). Under the FSP, unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends are considered to be a separate class of common stock and included in the EPS calculation using the "two-class method." Citigroup's restricted and deferred share awards meet the definition of a participating security. In accordance with the FSP, restricted and deferred sharesconsolidation model. First, former QSPEs are now included in the basic EPS calculation.scope of SFAS 167. Second, the FASB has changed the method of analyzing which party to a VIE should consolidate the VIE (known as the primary beneficiary) to a qualitative determination of which party to the VIE has "power," combined with potentially significant benefits or losses, instead of the previous quantitative risks and rewards model. The party that has "power" has the ability to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance. Third, the new standard requires that the primary beneficiary analysis be re-evaluated whenever circumstances change. The previous rules required reconsideration of the primary beneficiary only when specified reconsideration events occurred.

                  As a result of implementing these new accounting standards, Citigroup consolidated certain of the VIEs and former QSPEs with which it currently has involvement. Further, certain asset transfers, including transfers of portions of assets, that would have been considered sales under SFAS 140, are considered secured borrowings under the new standards.

                  In accordance with SFAS 167, Citigroup employed three approaches for newly consolidating certain VIEs and former QSPEs as of January 1, 2010. The first approach requires initially measuring the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests of the VIEs and former QSPEs at their carrying values (the amounts at which the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests would have been carried in the Consolidated Financial Statements, if Citigroup had always consolidated these VIEs and former QSPEs). The second approach measures assets at their unpaid principal amount, and is applied where using carrying values is not practicable. The third approach is to elect the fair value option, in which all of the financial assets and liabilities of certain designated VIEs and former QSPEs are recorded at fair value upon adoption of SFAS 167 and continue to be marked-to-market thereafter, with changes in fair value reported in earnings.

                  Citigroup consolidated all required VIEs and former QSPEs, as of January 1, 2010, at carrying values or unpaid principal amounts, except for certain private label residential mortgage and mutual fund deferred sales commissions VIEs, for which the fair value option was elected. The following tables present the impact of adopting these new accounting standards applying these approaches.

                  The incremental impact of these changes on GAAP assets and resulting risk-weighted assets for those VIEs and former QSPEs that were consolidated or deconsolidated for accounting purposes as of January 1, 2010 was as follows:

           
           Incremental 
          In billions of dollars GAAP
          assets
           Risk-
          weighted
          assets(3)
           

          Impact of consolidation

                 

          Credit cards

           $86.3 $0.8 

          Commercial paper conduits

            28.3  13.0 

          Student loans

            13.6  3.7 

          Private label consumer mortgages

            4.4  1.3 

          Municipal tender option bonds

            0.6  0.1 

          Collateralized loan obligations

            0.5  0.5 

          Mutual fund deferred sales commissions

            0.5  0.5 
                
           

          Subtotal

           $134.2 $19.9 
                

          Impact of deconsolidation

                 

          Collateralized debt obligations(1)

           $1.9 $3.6 

          Equity-linked notes(2)

            1.2  0.5 
                

          Total

           $137.3 $24.0 
                

          (1)
          The implementation of SFAS 167 resulted in the deconsolidation of certain synthetic and cash collateralized debt obligation (CDO) VIEs that were previously consolidated under the requirements of ASC 810 (FIN 46(R)). Due to the deconsolidation of these synthetic CDOs, Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet now reflects the recognition of current receivables and payables related to purchased and written credit default swaps entered into with these VIEs, which had previously been eliminated in consolidation. The deconsolidation of certain cash CDOs has a minimal impact on GAAP assets, but causes a sizable increase in risk-weighted assets. The impact on risk-weighted assets results from replacing, in Citigroup's trading account, largely investment grade securities owned by these VIEs when consolidated, with Citigroup's holdings of non-investment grade or unrated securities issued by these VIEs when deconsolidated.

          (2)
          Certain equity-linked note client intermediation transactions that had previously been consolidated under the requirements of ASC 810 (FIN 46 (R)) because Citigroup had repurchased and held a majority of the notes issued by the VIE were deconsolidated with the implementation of SFAS 167, because Citigroup does not have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance. Upon deconsolidation, Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet reflects both the equity-linked notes issued by the VIEs and held by Citigroup as trading assets, as well as related trading liabilities in the form of prepaid equity derivatives. These trading assets and trading liabilities were formerly eliminated in consolidation.

          (3)
          The net increase in risk-weighted assets (RWA) was $10 billion, principally reflecting the deduction from gross RWA of $13 billion of loan loss reserves (LLR) recognized from the adoption of SFAS 166/167, which exceeded the 1.25% limitation on LLRs includable in Tier 2 Capital.

          Table of Contents

                  The following table showsreflects the effectincremental impact of adopting the changed accounting for participating securitiesSFAS 166/167 on Citigroup's basicGAAP assets, liabilities, and diluted EPS for 2008 and 2009:stockholders' equity.

           
           1Q08 2Q08 3Q08 4Q08 Full Year
          2008
           1Q09 

          Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share(1)

                             

          As reported

           $(1.02)$(0.54)$(0.60)$(3.40)$(5.59) N/A 

          Two-class method

           $(1.03)$(0.55)$(0.61)$(3.40)$(5.61)$(0.18)
                        
          In billions of dollars January 1,
          2010
           

          Assets

              

          Trading account assets

           $(9.9)

          Investments

            (0.6)

          Loans

            159.4 
           

          Allowance for loan losses

            (13.4)

          Other assets

            1.8 
              

          Total assets

           $137.3 
              

          Liabilities

              

          Short-term borrowings

           $58.3 

          Long-term debt

            86.1 

          Other liabilities

            1.3 
              

          Total liabilities

           $145.7 
              

          Stockholders' equity

              

          Retained earnings

           $(8.4)
              

          Total stockholders' equity

            (8.4)
              

          Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

           $137.3 
              

          N/A    Not Applicable

          (1)
          Diluted EPS        The preceding tables reflect: (i) the portion of the assets of former QSPEs to which Citigroup, acting as principal, had transferred assets and received sales treatment prior to January 1, 2010 (totaling approximately $712.0 billion), and (ii) the assets of significant VIEs as of January 1, 2010 with which Citigroup is involved (totaling approximately $219.2 billion) that were previously unconsolidated and are required to be consolidated under the same as Basic EPS for all periods presented duenew accounting standards. Due to the net loss available to common shareholders. Using actual diluted shares would resultvariety of transaction structures and the level of Citigroup involvement in anti-dilution.

          Additional Disclosures for Derivative Instruments

                  On January 1, 2009,individual former QSPEs and VIEs, only a portion of the former QSPEs and VIEs with which the Company adopted SFAS No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendmentis involved were required to SFAS 133 (ASC 815-10-65-1 /SFAS 161). The standard requires enhanced disclosures about derivative instruments and hedged items that are accounted for under ASC 815-10 (SFAS 133) and related interpretations. No comparative information for periods prior to the effective date is required. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Derivatives Activities, for disclosures related to the Company's hedging activities and derivative instruments. ASC 815-10-65-1 (SFAS 161) had no impact on how Citigroup accounts for these instruments.

          Business Combinationsbe consolidated.

                  In December 2007,addition, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(revised),cumulative effect of adopting these new accounting standards as of January 1, 2010 resulted in an aggregate after-tax charge toBusiness CombinationsRetained earnings (ASC 805-10/SFAS 141(R)), which is designedof $8.4 billion, reflecting the net effect of an overall pretax charge to improveRetained earnings (primarily relating to the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparabilityestablishment of the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a business combination and its effects. The Statement retains the fundamental requirements that the acquisition method of accounting (which was called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. The Statement also retains the guidance for identifying and recognizing intangible assets separately from goodwill. The most significant changes are: (1) acquisition costs and restructuring costs will now be expensed; (2) stock consideration will be measured based on the quoted market price as of the acquisition date instead of the date the deal is announced; and (3) the acquirer will record a 100% step-up to fair value for all assets and liabilities, including the noncontrolling interest portion, and goodwill is recorded as if a 100% interest was acquired.

                  Citigroup adopted ASC 805-10 (SFAS 141(R)) on January 1, 2009,loan loss reserves and the standard is applied prospectively.

          Noncontrolling Interests in Subsidiaries

                  In December 2007,reversal of residual interests held) of $13.4 billion and the FASB issued Statement No. 160,Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (ASC 810-10-65-1/SFAS 160), which establishes standards for the accounting and reportingrecognition of noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries (previously called minority interests) in consolidated financial statements and for the loss of control of subsidiaries. Upon adoption, ASC 810-10-65-1 (SFAS 160) requires that the equity interest of noncontrolling shareholders, partners, or other equity holders in subsidiaries be presented as a separate item in Citigroup's stockholders' equity, rather than as a liability. After the initial adoption, when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary must be measured at fair value at the date of deconsolidation.related deferred tax assets amounting to $5.0 billion.

                  The gain or lossimpact on the deconsolidationcertain of Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios of adopting these new accounting standards, reflecting immediate implementation of the subsidiary is measured using the fair valuerecently issued final risk-based capital rules regarding SFAS 166/167, was as follows:


          As of January 1, 2010

          Impact

          Tier 1 Capital

          (141) bps

          Total Capital

          (142) bps

          Non-consolidation of the remaining investment, rather than the previous carrying amount of that retained investment.Certain Investment Funds

                  Citigroup adopted ASC 810-10-65-1 (SFAS 160) on January 1, 2009. As a result, $2.392 billion of noncontrolling interests was reclassified fromThe FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-10,Other liabilitiesConsolidation (Topic 810), Amendments for Certain Investment Funds (ASU 2010-10) in the first quarter of 2010. ASU 2010-10 provides a deferral to Citigroup's Stockholders' equity.

          Sale with Repurchase Financing Agreements

                  In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 140-3, "Accounting for Transfersrequirements of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions" (ASC 860-10-40). This FSP provides implementation guidance on whether a security transfer with a contemporaneous repurchase financing involving the transferred financial asset must be evaluated as one linked transaction or two separate de-linked transactions.

                  The FSP requires the recognition of the transfer and the repurchase agreement as one linked transaction, unless all ofSFAS 167 where the following criteria are met: (1) the initial transfer and the repurchase financing

            The entity being evaluated for consolidation is an investment company, as defined inASC 946-10,Finanical Services—Investment Companies, or an entity for which it is acceptable based on industry practice to apply measurement principles that are consistent with an investment company;

            The reporting enterprise does not contractually contingent on one another; (2) the initial transferor has full recourse upon default, and the repurchase agreement's price is fixed and not at fair value; (3) the financial asset is readily obtainable in the marketplace and the transfer and repurchase financing are executed at market rates; and (4) the maturityhave an explicit or implicit obligation to fund losses of the repurchaseentity that could potentially be significant to the entity; and

            The entity being evaluated for consolidation is not:

              A securitization entity;

              An asset-backed financing is before the maturityentity;

              An entity that was formerly considered a qualifying special-purpose entity.

          The Company has determined that a majority of the financial asset. The scopeinvestment vehicles managed by Citigroup are provided a deferral from the requirements of this FSP is limitedSFAS 167, because they meet these criteria. These vehicles continue to transfers and subsequent repurchase financingsbe evaluated under the requirements of ASC 810-10, prior to the implementation of SFAS 167 (FIN 46(R)).

                  Where the Company has determined that certain investment vehicles are entered into contemporaneously or in contemplationsubject to the consolidation requirements of one another.

                  Citigroup adoptedSFAS 167, the FSP on January 1, 2009. The impactconsolidation conclusions reached upon initial application of adopting this FSP was not material.SFAS 167 are consistent with the consolidation conclusions reached under the requirements of ASC 810-10, prior to the implementation of SFAS 167.


          Table of Contents

          FUTURE APPLICATION OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

          Fair Value Disclosures about Pension Plan Assets

                  In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, "Employers' Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets" (ASC 715-20-65-2). This FSP requires that information about plan assets be disclosed on an annual basis. Citigroup will be required to separate plan assets into the three fair value hierarchy levels and provide a rollforward of the changes in fair value of plan assets classified as Level 3 in Citigroup's annual Consolidated Financial Statements.

                  The disclosures about plan assets required by this FSP are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. This FSP will have no effect on the Company's accounting for plan benefits and obligations.

          Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share

                  On September 30,As of December 31, 2009, the FASB issuedCompany adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-12,Investments in Certain Entities Thatthat Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or its Equivalent), to provide, which provides guidance on measuring the fair value of certain alternative investments. The ASU permits entities to use net asset value as a practical expedient to measure the fair value of itstheir investments in certain investment funds. The ASU also requires additional disclosures regarding the nature and risks of such investments. The ASUinvestments and provides guidance on the classification of such investments as Level 2 or Level 3 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy. The ASU is effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2009. This ASU isdid not expected to have a material impact on the Company's accounting for its investments in alternative investment funds.

          Proposed Additional Disclosures Regarding Fair Value MeasurementsMultiple Foreign Exchange Rates

                  On August 28, 2009,In May 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-19,Foreign Currency Issues: Multiple Foreign Currency Exchange Rates. The ASU requires certain disclosure in situations when an exposure draftentity's reported balances in U.S. dollar monetary assets held by its foreign entities differ from the actual U.S. dollar-denominated balances due to different foreign exchange rates used in remeasurement and translation. The ASU also clarifies the reporting for the difference between the reported balances and the U.S. dollar-denominated balances upon the initial adoption of highly inflationary accounting. The ASU does not have a material impact on the Company's accounting.

          Effect of a proposedLoan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool Accounted for as a Single Asset (ASU No. 2010-18)

                  In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-18,Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements,Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool Accounted for as a Single Asset which proposes new disclosures about fair value measurements. Certain. As a result of the proposed amendments in this ASU, modifications of loans that are accounted for within a pool do not result in the removal of those loans from the pool, even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The ASU was effective for reporting periods ending on or after DecemberJuly 15, 2009. Additional disclosures have been proposed that would require a sensitivity analysis regarding the impact of unobservable inputs2010. The ASU had no material effect on the fair valuation of Level 3 instruments, which would be effective for reporting periods ending after March 15, 2010.Company's financial statements.

          FUTURE APPLICATIONS OF ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

          Loss-Contingency Disclosures

                  In June 2008,July 2010, the FASB issued ana second exposure draft proposing expanded disclosures regarding loss contingencies accounted for under FASB Statement No. 5,Accounting for Contingencies (ASC 450-10 to 20), and ASC 805-10 (SFAS 141(R)).contingencies. This proposal increases the number of loss contingencies subject to disclosure and requires substantial quantitative and qualitative information to be provided about those loss contingencies. The proposed effective date for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009, butproposal will have no effectimpact on the Company's accounting for loss contingencies.

          Elimination of QSPEsCredit Quality and Changes in the Consolidation ModelAllowance for Variable Interest EntitiesCredit Losses Disclosures

                  In May 2009,July 2010, the FASB issued SFASASU No. 166,2010-20,AccountingDisclosures about Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and Allowance for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140Credit Losses. (SFAS 166), thatThe ASU requires a greater level of disaggregated information about the allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of financing receivables. The period-end balance disclosure requirements for loans and the allowance for loans losses will eliminate Qualifying Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs). This change will have a significant impact on Citigroup's Consolidated Financial Statements as the Company will lose sales treatment for certain assets previously sold to QSPEs, as well as for certain future sales, and for certain transfers of portions of assets that do not meet the definition of participating interests. SFAS 166 isbe effective for fiscal yearsreporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010, while disclosures for activity during a reporting period that begin after November 15, 2009.

                  Simultaneously, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167,Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (SFAS 167), which details three key changes to the consolidation model. First, former QSPEs will now be includedoccurs in the scope of SFAS 167. In addition, the FASB has changed the method of analyzing which party to a variable interest entity (VIE) should consolidate the VIE (known as the primary beneficiary) to a qualitative determination of which party to the VIE has power combined with potentially significant benefitsloan and losses, instead of the current quantitative risks and rewards model. The entity that has power has the ability to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance. Finally, the new standard requires that the primary beneficiary analysis be re-evaluated whenever circumstances change. The current rules require reconsideration of the primary beneficiary only when specified reconsideration events occur.

                  As a result of implementing these new accounting standards, Citigroup expects to be required to consolidate certain of the VIEs and former QSPEs with which it currently has involvement. An ongoing evaluation of the application of these new requirements could, with the resolution of certain uncertainties, result in the identification of additional VIEs and QSPEs, other than those presented below, needing to be consolidated. It is not currently anticipated, however, that any such newly identified VIEs and QSPEs would have a significant impact on Citigroup's Consolidated Financial Statements or capital position.

                  In accordance with SFAS 167, Citigroup is currently evaluating two approaches for consolidating all of the VIEs and QSPEs that it expects to consolidate. The first approach would require initially measuring the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests of the VIEs and QSPEs at their carrying values (the amounts at which the assets, liabilities, and noncontrolling interests would have been carried in the Consolidated Financial Statements, if Citigroup were to be designated as the primary beneficiary). The second approach under consideration would be to elect the fair value option, in which all of the financial assets and liabilities of certain designated VIEs and QSPEs would be recorded at fair value upon adoption of SFAS 167 and continue to be marked to market thereafter, with changes in fair value reported in earnings.

                  While this review has not yet been completed, Citigroup's tentative approach would be to consolidate all of the VIEs and QSPEs that it expects to consolidate at carrying value, except for certain private label residential mortgages, for which the


          Table of Contents

          fair value option would be elected. The following tables present the pro forma impact of adopting these new accounting standards applying this tentative approach. The actual impact of adopting these new accounting requirements could, however, be significantly different should Citigroup change from this methodology. For instance, if Citigroup were to consolidate its off-balance sheet credit card securitization vehicles applying the fair value option, an associated allowance for loan losses would notaccounts will be established upon adoption of SFAS 167, with an offsetting chargeeffective for reporting periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010.

          Potential Amendments toRetained earnings. Rather, the charge toRetained earnings would be affected by the difference between the fair value of the assets and liabilities that Citigroup would consolidate, which would result in a lesser charge toRetained earnings than under the carrying value approach. Current Accounting Standards

                  The pro forma impactFASB is currently working on amendments to existing accounting standards governing financial instruments and lease accounting. Upon completion of these impendingthe standards, the Company will need to re-evaluate its accounting and disclosures. The FASB is proposing sweeping changes to the classification and measurement of financial instruments, hedging and impairment guidance. The FASB is also working on incremental GAAP assets and resulting risk-weighted assets for those VIEs and former QSPEsa project that are currently expectedwould require all leases to be consolidated or deconsolidatedcapitalized on the balance sheet. These projects will have significant impacts for accounting purposes as of January 1, 2010 (based on financial information as of September 30, 2009), reflecting Citigroup's present understandingthe Company. However, due to ongoing deliberations of the new requirements, and assuming continued application of existing risk-based capital rules, would be as follows:

           
           Incremental 
          In billions of dollars GAAP
          assets
           Risk-
          weighted
          assets(1)
           

          Impact of Consolidation:

                 

          Credit cards

           $84.2 $0.9 

          Commercial paper conduits

            39.7   

          Student loans

            13.9  4.0 

          Private label consumer mortgages

            7.7  4.6 

          Investment funds

            3.8  0.4 

          Commercial mortgages

            1.4  1.3 

          Muni bonds

            0.6  0.1 

          Mutual fund deferred sales commissions

            0.6  0.6 
                
           

          Subtotal

           $151.9 $11.9 
                

          Impact of Deconsolidation:

                 

          Collateralized debt obligations(2)

           $1.9 $5.9 
                

          Total

           $153.8 $17.8 
                

          (1)
          Citigroup undertook certain actions during the first and second quarters of 2009 in support of its off-balance sheet credit card securitization vehicles. As a result of these actions, Citigroup included approximately $82 billion of incremental risk-weighted assets in its risk-based capital ratios as of March 31, 2009 and an additional approximately $900 million as of June 30, 2009. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

          (2)
          The implementation of SFAS 167 will result in the deconsolidation of certain synthetic and cash collateralized debt obligation (CDO) VIEs that were previously consolidated under the requirements of ASC 810 (FIN 46(R)). Upon deconsolidation of these synthetic CDOs, Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet will reflect the recognition of current receivables and payables related to purchased and written credit default swaps entered into with these VIEs, which had previously been eliminated in consolidation. The deconsolidation of certain cash CDOs will have a minimal impact on GAAP assets, but will cause a sizable increase in risk-weighted assets. The impact on risk-weighted assets results from replacing, in Citigroup's trading account, largely investment grade securities owned by these VIEs when consolidated, with Citigroup's holdings of non-investment grade or unrated securities issued by these VIEs when deconsolidated.

                  In September 2009, the U.S. banking and thrift regulatory agencies issued a notice of proposed rulemaking in which the agencies proposed, in part, to eliminate the existing provision in the risk-based capital rules that permits a banking organization, if it is required to consolidate for accounting purposes a qualifying ABCP program that it sponsors, to exclude the consolidated assets from its risk-weighted assets.

                  If this exclusion under the existing risk-based capital rules for qualifying ABCP programs, such as commercial paper conduits, were to be eliminated, as proposed, Citigroup's total incremental risk-weighted assets (based on financial information as of September 30, 2009) would be greater by approximately an additional $15.9 billion.

                  The above table reflects: (i) the estimated portion of the assets of former QSPEs to which Citigroup, acting as principal, has transferred assets and received sales treatment as of September 30, 2009 (totaling approximately $733.5 billion), and (ii) the estimated assets of significant unconsolidated VIEs as of September 30, 2009 with which Citigroup is involved (totaling approximately $231.4 billion) that would be required to be consolidated under the new accounting standards. Due to the variety of transaction structures and the level of Citigroup involvement in individual former QSPEs and VIEs, only a portion of the former QSPEs and VIEs with whichstandard-setters, the Company is involved is expectedcurrently unable to be consolidated.

                  In addition,determine the cumulative effect of adopting these newfuture amendments or proposals at this time. The FASB and IASB are currently working on several joint projects aimed at converging the two sets of accounting standards as of January 1, 2010, based on financial information as of September 30, 2009, would result in an estimated aggregate after-tax chargestandards. However, the two Boards have proposed very different models for the Financial Instruments project. Due toRetained earnings of approximately $7.8 billion, reflecting certain differences between the net effect of an overall pretax charge toRetained earnings (primarily relating to the establishment of loan loss reservesFASB and the reversal of residual interests held) of approximately $12.5 billion and the recognition of related deferred tax assets amounting to approximately $4.7 billion.

                  The pro forma impact on certain of Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios of adopting these new accounting standards (based on financial information as of September 30, 2009), and assuming the continued application of the existing risk-based capital rules, wouldIASB models, Citi believes achieving convergence will be as follows:

           
           As of September 30, 2009 
           
           As Reported Pro Forma Impact 

          Tier 1 Capital

            12.76% 11.44% (132) bps 

          Total Capital

            16.58% 15.26% (132) bps 

                  Elimination of the exclusion noted above under the existing risk-based capital rules for qualifying ABCP programs, such as commercial paper conduits, would further adversely affect certain of Citigroup's regulatory capital ratios. The pro forma impact on Citigroup's Tier 1 Capital and Total Capital ratios (based on financial information as of September 30, 2009), including the additional approximately $15.9 billion of risk-weighted assets arising from the consolidation of the commercial paper conduits, would be a total reduction in these ratios from those reported at September 30, 2009 of approximately 151 bps and 154 bps, respectively.

                  The actual impact of adopting the new accounting standards on January 1, 2010 could differ, as financial information changes from the September 30, 2009 estimates


          Table of Contents

          and as several uncertainties in the application of these new standards are resolved.challenging.

          Investment Company Audit Guide (SOP 07-1)

                  In July 2007, the AICPA issued Statement of Position 07-1, "Clarification of the Scope of the Audit and Accounting Guide for Investment Companies and Accounting by Parent Companies and Equity Method Investors for Investments in Investment Companies" (ASC 946-10/SOP(SOP 07-1) (now incorporated into ASC 946-10,Financial Services-Investment Companies), which was expected to be effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2007. However, in February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date indefinitely by issuing an FSP SOP 07-1-1, "Effective Date of AICPA Statement of Position 07-1." This statement sets forth more stringent


          Table of Contents

          criteria for qualifying as an investment company than does the predecessor Audit Guide. In addition, ASC 946-10 (SOP 07-1) establishes new criteria for a parent company or equity method investor to retain investment company accounting in their consolidated financial statements. Investment companies record all their investments at fair value with changes in value reflected in earnings. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting the SOP.


          Table of Contents

          2.    DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

          Sale of The Student Loan Corporation

                  On September 17, 2010, the Company announced that The Student Loan Corporation (SLC), an indirect subsidiary that is 80% owned by Citibank and 20% owned by public shareholders which is part of the CitiHolding segment, had entered into definitive agreements that will result in the divestiture of Citi's private student loan business and approximately $31 billion of its approximately $41 billion in assets to Discover Financial Services (Discover) and SLM Corporation (Sallie Mae). The sale is currently expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2010.

                  This sale is reported as discontinued operations for the third quarter of 2010 only. Prior periods were not reclassified due to the immateriality of the impact in those periods. The total third quarter of 2010 loss on the sale of The Student Loan Corporation of ($454) million is composed of ($63) million in Continuing Operations and, ($447) million in Discontinued Operations, partially offset by $56 million in Noncontrolling Interests (Minority Interests).

                  Total assets and total liabilities (after impairment) of $31 billion and $30 billion, respectively associated with the sale of SLC are included inAssets of discontinued operations held for sale andLiabilities of discontinued operations held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

                  Additionally, as part of the transactions, Citibank, N.A. will purchase approximately $8.7 billion of assets from SLC. Prior to the sale of SLC, sold $4.7 billion in FFELP loans were sold to the Department of Education, as previously disclosed by SLC.

                  The following is a summary as of September 30, 2010 of the assets and liabilities ofDiscontinued operations held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the operations related to the SLC business to be sold:

          In millions of dollars September 30,
          2010
           

          Assets

              

          Loans, net of unearned income

           $30,284 

          Allowance for loan losses

            (54)
              
           

          Total loans, net

            30,230 

          Other assets

            1,179 
              

          Total assets

           $31,409 
              

          Liabilities

              

          Long-term debt

           $29,556 

          Other liabilities

            318 
              

          Total liabilities

           $29,874 
              

                  Summarized financial information for discontinued operations, including cash flows, related to the sale of SLC follows:

          In millions of dollars Three and Nine Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
          2010
           

          Total revenues, net of interest expense

           $(670)
              

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations

           $20 

          Loss on sale

            (820)

          Benefit for income taxes

            (365)
              

          Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

           $(435)
              


          In millions of dollars Nine Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
          2010
           

          Cash flows from operating activities

           $4,839 

          Cash flows from investing activities

            694 

          Cash flows from financing activities

            (5,533)
              

          Net cash provided by discontinued operations

           $ 
              

          Table of Contents

          Sale of Nikko Cordial

                  On October 1, 2009, the Company announced the successful completion of the sale of Nikko Cordial Securities to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation. The transaction hashad a total cash value to Citi of ¥776776 billion (US$8.7yen (U.S. $8.7 billion at an exchange rate of ¥89.6089.60 yen to US$1.00U.S. $1.00 as of September 30, 2009). The cash value is composed of the purchase price for the transferred business of ¥545545 billion yen, the purchase price for certain Japanese-listed equity securities held by Nikko Cordial Securities of ¥3030 billion yen, and ¥201201 billion yen of excess cash derived through the repayment of outstanding indebtedness to Citi. After considering the impact of foreign exchange hedges of the proceeds of the transaction, (most of which has been recorded in the second and third quarters of 2009), the sale will resultresulted in an immaterial after-tax gain to Citigroup.in 2009. A total of about 7,800 employees are included in the transaction.

                  The Nikko Cordial operations had total assets and total liabilities as of September 30, 2009 of $23.6approximately $24 billion and $16.0$16 billion, respectively.respectively, at the time of sale, which were reflected in Citi Holdings prior to the sale.

                  Results for all of the Nikko Cordial businesses sold are reported asDiscontinued operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the businesses being sold are included inAssets of discontinued operations held for sale andLiabilities of discontinued operations held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

                  The following is a summary as of September 30, 2009 of the assets and liabilities ofDiscontinued operations held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheet for the operations related to the Nikko Cordial businesses to be sold:

          In millions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           

          Assets

              

          Cash due from banks

           $224 

          Deposits at interest with banks

            398 

          Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

            5,837 

          Brokerage receivables

            1,293 

          Trading account assets

            8,583 

          Investments

            490 

          Goodwill

            567 

          Intangibles

            3,289 

          Other assets

            2,923 
              

          Total assets

           $23,604 
              

          Liabilities

              

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase sold under agreements to repurchase

           $3,126 

          Brokerage payables

            2,566 

          Trading account liabilities

            2,823 

          Short term borrowings

            5,817 

          Other liabilities

            1,672 
              

          Total liabilities

           $16,004 
              

                  Summarized financial information for discontinued operations, including cash flows, related to the sale of Nikko Cordial follows:

           
           Three Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           Nine Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

          Total revenues, net of interest expense

           $173 $422 $553 $1,245 
                    

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations

           $(221)$6 $(603)$2 

          Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes(1)

            208  1  75  (9)
                    

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

           $(429)$5 $(678)$11 
                    

          (1)
          Includes a tax expense of $290 million in the third quarter of 2009 related to the fourth quarter 2009 sale of Nikko Cordial.

           
           Nine Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

          Cash flows from operating activities

           $(1,320)$(4,519)

          Cash flows from investing activities

            (9,579) (1,381)

          Cash flows from financing activities

            11,108  5,907 
                

          Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

           $209 $7 
                

          Table of Contents

          Sale of Citigroup's German Retail Banking Operations

                  On December 5, 2008, Citigroup sold its German retail banking operations to Credit Mutuel for Euro 5.2 billion in cash plus the German retail bank's operating net earnings accrued in 2008 through the closing. The sale resulted in an after-tax gain of approximately $3.9 billion including the after-tax gain on the foreign currency hedge of $383 million recognized during the fourth quarter of 2008.

                  The sale did not include the corporate and investment banking business or the Germany-based European data center. Results for all of the German retail banking businesses sold are reported asDiscontinued operations for all periods presented.

                  Summarized financial information forDiscontinued operations, including cash flows, related to the sale of the German retail banking operationsNikko Cordial is as follows:

           
           Three Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           Nine Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

          Total revenues, net of interest expense

           $25 $847 $61 $2,001 
                    

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations

           $18 $503 $(21)$851 

          Gain (loss) on sale(1)

                (41)  

          Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes

            6  (101) (42) 22 
                    

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

           $12 $604 $(20)$829 
                    

          (1)
          2009 YTD activity represents transactions related to a transitional service agreement between Citigroup and Credit Mutuel as well as adjustments against the gain on sale for the final settlement which occurred in April 2009.

           
           Nine Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

          Cash flows from operating activities

           $6 $(1,252)

          Cash flows from investing activities

            1  1,833 

          Cash flows from financing activities

            (7) (760)
                

          Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

           $ $(179)
                
           
           Three Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           Nine Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

          Total revenues, net of interest expense

           $ $173 $92 $553 
                    

          Loss from discontinued operations

           $ $(221)$(7)$(603)

          Gain on sale

                94   

          Provision (benefit) for income taxes

             $208  (122)$75 
                    

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

           $ $(429)$209 $(678)
                    

          CitiCapital

                  On July 31, 2008, Citigroup sold substantially all of CitiCapital, the equipment finance unit inNorth America. The total proceeds from the transaction were approximately $12.5 billion and resulted in an after-tax loss to Citigroup of $305 million. This loss is included inIncome from discontinued operations on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income for the second quarter of 2008.

                  Results for all of the CitiCapital businesses sold are reported asDiscontinued operations for all periods presented.

                  Summarized financial information forDiscontinued operations, including cash flows, related to the sale of CitiCapital is as follows:

           
           Three Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           Nine Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 

          Total revenues, net of interest expense

           $7 $96 $37 $14 
                    

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations

           $(1)$(2)$(11)$45 

          Gain (loss) on sale(1)

              9  14  (508)

          Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes

              3  1  (201)
                    

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

           $(1)$4 $2 $(262)
                    
           
           Nine Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2010 2009 

          Cash flows from operating activities

           $(134)$(1,830)

          Cash flows from investing activities

            185  1,727 

          Cash flows from financing activities

               
                

          Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

           $51 $(103)
                

          (1)
          The $3 million in income from discontinued operations for the first half of 2009 relates to a transitional service agreement.

           
           Nine Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008 

          Cash flows from operating activities

           $ $(287)

          Cash flows from investing activities

              349 

          Cash flows from financing activities

              (61)
                

          Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

           $ $1 
                

          Table of Contents

          Combined Results for Discontinued Operations

                  The following is summarized financial information for the SLC business, Nikko Cordial business, German retail banking operations and CitiCapital business. The German retail banking operation, which was sold on December 5, 2008, and the Citi Capital business, which was sold on July 31, 2008, continue to have minimal residual costs associated with the sales. However, during the third quarter of 2010, the Company completed an income tax audit in Germany related to the business sold in 2008. As a result of completing this audit, the Company has released reserves approximately $68 million. Additionally, contingency consideration payments received during the first quarter of 2009 of $29 million pretax ($19 million after-tax) related to the sale of Citigroup's Asset Management business, which was sold in December 2005, is also included in these balances.


           Three Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           Nine Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
            Three Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           Nine Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008  2010 2009 2010 2009 

          Total revenues, net of interest expense

           $205 $1,365 $651 $3,260  $(629)$205 $(494)$651 
                            

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations

           $(204)$507 $(635)$898  $8 $(204)$ $(635)

          Gain (loss) on sale

            9 2 (508)

          Provision (benefit) for income taxes and noncontrolling interest, net of taxes

           214 (97) 44 (188)

          Loss on sale

           (784)  (690) 2 

          (Benefit) provision for income taxes

           (402) 214 (524) 44 
                            

          Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

           $(418)$613 $(677)$578 

          Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes

           $(374)$(418)$(166)$(677)
                            

          Table of Contents

          Cash Flowsflows from Discontinued Operationsdiscontinued operations


           Nine Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
            Nine Months
          Ended Sept. 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008  2010 2009 

          Cash flows from operating activities

           $(1,314)$(6,058) $4,707 $(1,824)

          Cash flows from investing activities

           (9,549) 801  880 1,757 

          Cash flows from financing activities

           11,101 5,086  (5,536) (7)
                    

          Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

           $238 $(171)

          Net cash provided by discontinued operations

           $51 $(74)
                    

          Table of Contents

          3.    BUSINESS SEGMENTS

                  The following table presents certain information regarding the Company's operations by segment:



           Revenues, net
          of interest expense
           Provision (benefit)
          for income taxes
           Income (loss) from
          continuing operations(1)
           Identifiable assets(2) 
           Revenues, net
          of interest expense(1)
           Provision (benefit)
          for income taxes
           Income (loss) from
          continuing operations(1)(2)
           Identifiable assets 


           Three Months Ended September 30,  
            
           
           Three Months Ended September 30,  
            
           
          In millions of dollars, except
          identifiable assets in billions
          In millions of dollars, except
          identifiable assets in billions
           Sept. 30,
          2009
           Dec. 31,
          2008
           In millions of dollars, except
          identifiable assets in billions
           Sep. 30,
          2010
           Dec. 31,
          2009
           
          2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008  2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 

          Regional Consumer Banking

          Regional Consumer Banking

           $5,675 $6,109 $(246)$24 $615 $446 $205 $200 

          Regional Consumer Banking

           $8,161 $6,120 $476 $(203)$1,232 $704 $320 $257 

          Institutional Clients Group

          Institutional Clients Group

           7,350 9,911 584 1,410 1,694 3,156 809 802 

          Institutional Clients Group

           8,128 7,348 734 460 2,332 1,786 963 882 
                                             

          Subtotal Citicorp

           13,025 16,020 338 1,434 2,309 3,602 1,014 1,002 

          Subtotal Citicorp

           16,289 13,468 1,210 257 3,564 2,490 1,283 1,139 

          Citi Holdings

          Citi Holdings

           6,694 704 (1,588) (4,526) (1,818) (6,936) 617 715 

          Citi Holdings

           3,853 6,250 (590) (1,513) (1,054) (1,994) 421 487 

          Corporate/Other

          Corporate/Other

           671 (466) 128 (203) 102 (187) 258 221 

          Corporate/Other

           596 672 78 134 91 97 279 231 
                                             

          Total

          Total

           $20,390 $16,258 $(1,122)$(3,295)$593 $(3,521)$1,889 $1,938 

          Total

           $20,738 $20,390 $698 $(1,122)$2,601 $593 $1,983 $1,857 
                                             

           



           Revenues, net
          of interest expense
           Provision (benefit)
          for income taxes
           Income (loss) from
          continuing operations(1)
           
           Revenues, net
          of interest expense(1)
           Provision (benefit)
          for income taxes
           Income (loss) from
          continuing operations(1)(2)
           


           Nine Months Ended September 30, 
           Nine Months Ended September 30, 
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 


           2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 

          Regional Consumer Banking

          Regional Consumer Banking

           $17,051 $19,964 $(303)$902 $1,416 $2,768 

          Regional Consumer Banking

           $24,275 $18,674 $1,039 $(40)$3,423 $1,919 

          Institutional Clients Group

          Institutional Clients Group

           31,503 29,931 5,340 3,907 11,633 8,915 

          Institutional Clients Group

           27,025 31,106 3,504 4,821 9,098 11,638 
                                     

          Subtotal Citicorp

           48,554 49,895 5,037 4,809 13,049 11,683 

          Subtotal Citicorp

           51,300 49,780 4,543 4,781 12,521 13,557 

          Citi Holdings

          Citi Holdings

           25,896 (1,735) (4,562) (13,619) (5,795) (21,311)

          Citi Holdings

           15,322 24,669 (2,182) (4,312) (3,127) (6,297)

          Corporate/Other

          Corporate/Other

           430 (2,207) 145 (818) (580) (1,408)

          Corporate/Other

           1,608 431 185 151 184 (586)
                                     

          Total

          Total

           $74,880 $45,953 $620 $(9,628)$6,674 $(11,036)

          Total

           $68,230 $74,880 $2,546 $620 $9,578 $6,674 
                                     

          (1)
          Includes Citicorp total revenues, net of interest expense, inNorth America of $6.6 billion and $4.0 billion; inEMEA of $2.9 billion and $3.5 billion; inLatin America of $3.3 billion and $3.0 billion; and inAsia of $3.5 billion and $3.0 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Includes Citicorp total revenues, net of interest expense, inNorth America of $21.5 billion and $16.6 billion; inEMEA of $9.7 billion and $12.7 billion; inLatin America of $9.3 billion and $9.4 billion; and inAsia of $10.8 billion and $11.1 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Regional numbers exclude Citi Holdings and Corporate/Other, which largely operate within the U.S.

          (2)
          Includes pretax provisions (credits) for credit losses and for benefits and claims in theRegional Consumer Banking results of $1.8$2.4 billion and $1.6 billion,$1.8 billion; in theICG results of $0.4 billion$266 million and $0.4 billion$458 million; and in the Citi Holdings results of $6.9$3.3 billion and $7.0$6.8 billion for the third quarters ofthree months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and 2008, respectively. Includes pretax provisions (credits) for credit losses and for benefits and claims in theRegional Consumer Banking results of $5.6$7.8 billion and $4.3 billion, $5.8 billion; in theICG results of $1.6 billion$(29) million and $0.9 billion$1.7 billion; and in the Citi Holdings results of $24.8$13.4 billion and $16.8$24.5 billion for the nine months of 2009 and 2008, respectively.

          (2)
          Identifiable assets atended September 30, 2010 and 2009, include assets of discontinued operations held for sale of $23.6 billion recorded in Citi Holdings.respectively.

          Table of Contents

          4.    INTEREST REVENUE AND EXPENSE

                  For the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, interest revenue and expense consisted of the following:


           Three Months
          Ended September 30,
           Nine Months
          Ended September 30,
            Three Months
          Ended September 30,
           Nine Months
          Ended September 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008  2010 2009 2010 2009 

          Interest revenue

            

          Loan interest, including fees

           $11,601 $15,528 $36,385 $47,883  $13,332 $11,601 $42,232 $36,385 

          Deposits at interest with banks

           313 792 1,126 2,329 

          Deposits with banks

           318 313 899 1,126 

          Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell

           728 2,215 2,407 7,751  807 728 2,340 2,407 

          Investments, including dividends

           3,283 2,597 9,894 7,832  2,611 3,283 8,706 9,894 

          Trading account assets(1)

           2,654 4,137 8,526 13,562  2,026 2,654 5,909 8,526 

          Other interest

           99 861 594 3,271  277 99 555 594 
                            

          Total interest revenue

           $18,678 $26,130 $58,932 $82,628  $19,371 $18,678 $60,641 $58,932 
                            

          Interest expense

            

          Deposits(2)

           $2,298 $4,915 $7,986 $16,191  $2,130 $2,298 $6,246 $7,986 

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

           772 2,721 2,807 9,559  671 772 2,122 2,807 

          Trading account liabilities(1)

           43 285 220 1,064  108 43 277 220 

          Short-term borrowing

           350 924 1,128 3,233 

          Short-term borrowings

           213 350 704 1,128 

          Long-term debt

           3,217 3,881 9,038 12,103  3,003 3,217 9,446 9,038 
                            

          Total interest expense

           $6,680 $12,726 $21,179 $42,150  $6,125 $6,680 $18,795 $21,179 
                            

          Net interest revenue

           $11,998 $13,404 $37,753 $40,478  $13,246 $11,998 $41,846 $37,753 

          Provision for loan losses

           8,771 8,943 30,919 21,503  5,666 8,771 20,555 30,919 
                            

          Net interest revenue after provision for loan losses

           $3,227 $4,461 $6,834 $18,975  $7,580 $3,227 $21,291 $6,834 
                            

          (1)
          Interest expense on tradingTrading account liabilities of the ICG is reported as a reduction of interest revenue forfromTrading account assets.

          (2)
          Includes FDIC deposit insurance fees and charges.charges of $226 million and $285 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, and $691 million and $1,254 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, respectively. The nine months ended September 30, 2009 FDIC insurance fees include the one-time FDIC special assessment of $333 million

          Table of Contents

          5.    COMMISSIONS AND FEES

                  Commissions and fees revenue includes charges to customers for credit and bank cards, including transaction-processing fees and annual fees; advisory and equity and debt underwriting services; lending and deposit-related transactions, such as loan commitments, standby letters of credit and other deposit and loan servicing activities; investment management-related fees, including brokerage services and custody and trust services; and insurance fees and commissions.

                  The following table presents commissions and fees revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:30:


           Three Months
          Ended September 30,
           Nine Months
          Ended September 30,
            Three Months
          Ended September 30,
           Nine Months
          Ended September 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008  2010 2009 2010 2009 

          Credit cards and bank cards

           $1,048 $1,113 $3,025 $3,504  $1,013 $1,048 $2,977 $3,025 

          Investment banking

           774 545 2,659 2,337  683 784 2,001 2,659 

          Smith Barney

           1 688 837 2,196   1  837 

          ICG trading-related

           466 628 1,288 1,930  429 502 1,431 1,400 

          Other Consumer

           323 235 935 870 

          Transaction services

           337 359 980 1,076  374 336 1,085 980 

          Other consumer

           303 324 933 935 

          Checking-related

           261 282 773 868  256 261 789 773 

          Other ICG

           176 338 364 582  79 93 256 281 

          Primerica

           78 98 227 315 

          Primerica-related (prior to March 2010)

            78 91 227 

          Loan servicing(1)

           (339) (336) 1,224 771  (29) 141 253 167 

          Corporate finance(2)

           130 (649) 551 (4,149) 137 130 320 551 

          Other

           (37) (93) (40) 48  3  (14) (69)
                            

          Total commissions and fees

           $3,218 $3,208 $12,823 $10,348  $3,248 $3,698 $10,122 $11,766 
                            

          (1)
          Includes fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing assets. The mark-to-market onBeginning in the underlying economic hedges of the MSRs is included in Other revenue.

          (2)
          Includes write-downs of approximately $24 million for the thirdsecond quarter of 20092010, for clarity purposes, Citigroup has reclassified the MSR mark-to-market and $508 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, and $792 million for the third quarter of 2008 and $4.3 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, net of underwriting fees on funded and unfunded highly leveraged finance commitments. Write-downs were recorded on all highly leveraged finance commitments where there was value impairment, regardless of funding date.MSR hedging activities from multiple income statement lines together intoOther revenue. All periods presented reflect this reclassification.

          Table of Contents

          6.    PRINCIPAL TRANSACTIONS

                  Principal transactions revenue consists of realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading activities. Trading activities include revenues from fixed income, equities, credit and commodities products, as well as foreign exchange transactions. Not included in the table below is the impact of net interest revenue related to trading activities, which is an integral part of trading activities' profitability. The following tables present principal transactions revenue for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:

           
           Three Months
          Ended September 30,
           Nine Months
          Ended September 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2010(1) 2009(1) 2010(1) 2009(1) 

          Regional Consumer Banking

           $150 $149 $399 $1,094 

          Institutional Clients Group

            982  (571) 5,958  7,259 
                    
           

          Subtotal Citicorp

           $1,132 $(422)$6,357 $8,353 

          Local Consumer Lending

            (36) 389  (190) 917 

          Brokerage and Asset Management

            1  1  (27) 25 

          Special Asset Pool

            343  1,385  2,094  (2,863)
                    
           

          Subtotal Citi Holdings

           $308 $1,775 $1,877 $(1,921)

          Corporate/Other

            88  (10) (336) 612 
                    

          Total Citigroup

           $1,528 $1,343 $7,898 $7,044 
                    


           
           Three Months
          Ended September 30,
           Nine Months
          Ended September 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2010(1) 2009(1) 2010(1) 2009(1) 

          Interest rate contracts(2)

           $76 $166 $3,718 $6,619 

          Foreign exchange contracts(3)

            992  522  1,495  2,386 

          Equity contracts(4)

            468  (353) 783  550 

          Commodity and other contracts(5)

            (33) 162  197  989 

          Credit derivatives(6)

            25  846  1,705  (3,500)
                    

          Total Citigroup

           $1,528 $1,343 $7,898 $7,044 
                    

          (1)
          Beginning in the second quarter of 2010, for clarity purposes, Citigroup has reclassified the MSR mark-to-market and MSR hedging activities from multiple income statement lines together intoOther Revenue. All periods presented reflect this reclassification.

          (2)
          Includes revenues from government securities and corporate debt, municipal securities, preferred stock, mortgage securities and other debt instruments. Also includes options on fixed income securities, interest rate swaps, swap options, caps and floors, financial futures, over-the-counter (OTC) options and forward contracts on fixed income securities.

          (3)
          Includes revenues from foreign exchange spot, forward, option and swap contracts, as well as translation gains and losses.

          (4)
          Includes revenues from common, preferred and convertible preferred stock, convertible corporate debt, equity-linked notes, and exchange-traded and OTC equity options and warrants.

          (5)
          Primarily includes revenues from crude oil, refined oil products, natural gas, and other commodities trades.

          (6)
          Includes revenues from structured credit products.

          Table of Contents

          7.    RETIREMENT BENEFITS AND INCENTIVE PLANS

                  The Company has several non-contributory defined benefit pension plans covering certain U.S. employees and has various defined benefit pension and termination indemnitytermination-indemnity plans covering employees outside the United States. The principal U.S. defined benefit plan which formerly covered substantially all U.S. employees, is closed to new entrants and effectiveEffective January 1, 2008, no longer accrues benefitsthe U.S. qualified pension plan was frozen for most employees. Employees satisfyingAccordingly, no additional compensation-based contributions have been credited to cash balance accounts for existing plan participants after December 31, 2007. However, employees still covered under certain age and service requirements remain covered by a prior final pay formula.

          formulas continue to accrue benefits. The Company also offers postretirement health care and life insurance benefits to certain eligible U.S. retired employees, as well as to certain eligible employees outside the United States. For information

                  The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the "Act") were signed into law in the U.S. in March 2010. One provision of the Act that impacts Citigroup is the elimination of the tax deductibility for benefits paid that are related to the retiree Medicare Part D subsidy starting in 2013. Citigroup is required to recognize the full accounting impact in the period in which the Act is signed, which resulted in a $45 million reduction in deferred tax assets with a corresponding charge to income from continuing operations in the first quarter of 2010. The other provisions of the Act are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company's retirement benefit plansCitigroup's pension and pension assumptions, see Citigroup's 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K.post-retirement plans.

                  The following tables summarize the components of the net (benefit) expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the threeCompany's U.S. qualified pension plan, post-retirement plans and nineplans outside the United States. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for the U.S. plans, as well as the plans outside the United States.

          Net (Benefit) Expense

           
           Three Months Ended September 30, 
           
           Pension Plans Postretirement Benefit Plans 
           
           U.S. plans(1) Non-U.S. plans U.S. plans Non-U.S. plans 
          In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 

          Benefits earned during the period

           $4 $1 $43 $38 $ $1 $5 $7 

          Interest cost on benefit obligation

            161  177  84  78  15  16  26  23 

          Expected return on plan assets

            (220) (232) (94) (87) (2) (2) (24) (19)

          Amortization of unrecognized

                                   
           

          Net transition obligation

                (1) (1)        
           

          Prior service cost (benefit)

                1  1  (1) (1)    
           

          Net actuarial loss

            12  (1) 14  18  3    5  4 
           

          Curtailment (gain) loss

              29             
                            

          Net (benefit) expense

           $(43)$(26)$47 $47 $15 $14 $12 $15 
                            

          (1)
          The U.S. plans exclude nonqualified pension plans, for which the net expense was million $11 million and $12 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and 2008.

          Net Expense (Benefit)

          respectively.

           
           Three Months Ended September 30, 
           
           Pension Plans Postretirement Benefit Plans 
           
           U.S. Plans(1) Plans Outside U.S. U.S. Plans Plans Outside U.S. 
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 

          Benefits earned during the period

           $1 $3 $38 $54 $1 $ $7 $9 

          Interest cost on benefit obligation

            177  176  78  93  16  17  23  26 

          Expected returns on plan assets

            (232) (245) (87) (128) (2) (4) (19) (29)

          Amortization of unrecognized:

                                   
           

          Net transition obligation

                (1)          
           

          Prior service cost (benefit)

                1  1  (1)      
           

          Net actuarial loss

            (1)   18  6    3  4  5 

          Curtailment (gain) loss

            29               
                            

          Net expense (benefit)

           $(26)$(66)$47 $26 $14 $16 $15 $11 
                            


           
           Nine Months Ended September 30, 
           
           Pension Plans Postretirement Benefit Plans 
           
           U.S. Plans(1) Plans Outside U.S. U.S. Plans Plans Outside U.S. 
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 2009 2008 

          Benefits earned during the period

           $13 $18 $109 $157 $1 $1 $20 $28 

          Interest cost on benefit obligation

            503  505  222  275  46  47  66  76 

          Expected returns on plan assets

            (690) (712) (249) (378) (7) (9) (57) (86)

          Amortization of unrecognized:

                                   
           

          Net transition obligation

                (1) 1         
           

          Prior service cost (benefit)

            (1) (1) 3  3  (1)      
           

          Net actuarial loss

            1    51  19  1  3  13  16 

          Curtailment (gain) loss

            29               
                            

          Net expense (benefit)

           $(145)$(190)$135 $77 $40 $42 $42 $34 
                            
           
           Nine Months Ended September 30, 
           
           Pension Plans Postretirement Benefit Plans 
           
           U.S. plans(1) Non-U.S. plans U.S. plans Non-U.S. plans 
          In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 

          Benefits earned during the period

           $13 $13 $125 $109 $ $1 $17 $20 

          Interest cost on benefit obligation

            480  503  254  222  44  46  78  66 

          Expected return on plan assets

            (643) (690) (281) (249) (6) (7) (74) (57)

          Amortization of unrecognized

                                   
           

          Net transition obligation

                (1) (1)        
           

          Prior service cost (benefit)

            (1) (1) 3  3  1  (1)    
           

          Net actuarial loss

            34  1  42  51  5  1  15  13 
           

          Curtailment (gain) loss

              29             
                            

          Net (benefit) expense

           $(117)$(145)$142 $135 $44 $40 $36 $42 
                            

          (1)
          The U.S. plans exclude nonqualified pension plans, for which the net expense was $12$33 million and $9$31 million for the threenine months ended September 30, 20092010 and 2008, respectively, and $31 million and $29 million for the first nine months of 2009, and 2008, respectively.

          Table of Contents

          Employer Contributions

                  Citigroup's pension funding policy for U.S. plans and non-U.S. plans is generally to fund to applicable minimum funding requirements, rather than to the amounts of accumulated benefit obligations. For the U.S. plans,qualified pension plan, the Company may increase its contributions above the minimum required contribution under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, (ERISA),as amended, if appropriate to its tax and cash position and the plan's funded position. AsThe Company made a discretionary cash contribution of $995 million to the U.S. qualified pension plan as of September 30, 2009, the Company contributions to the U.S. pension plan include $9 million relating to certain investment advisory fees that were paid by the Company. There were no minimum required contributions and no discretionary cash or non-cash contributions are currently planned for the U.S. plans.2010. For the non-U.S. pension plans, the Company contributed $124$106 million as of September 30, 2009. Citigroup presently anticipates contributing2010 and expects to contribute an additional $113$57 million in 2010. The Company also expects to fund itscontribute $33 million of benefits to be paid directly by the Company on behalf of the non-U.S. pension plans. For the non-U.S. postretirement benefit plans, expected cash contributions for 2010 are $74 million, which includes $3 million of benefits to be paid directly by the Company. These estimates are subject to change, since contribution decisions are affected by various factors, such as market performance and regulatory requirements; in 2009 for a total of $237 million.addition, management has the ability to change funding policy.

          7.     RESTRUCTURINGStock-Based Incentive Compensation

                  In the fourth quarter of 2008, Citigroup recorded a pretax restructuringThe Company recognized compensation expense of $1.581 billion related to the implementationincentive plans of a Company-wide re-engineering plan. For$641 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009,2010, and $1,295 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The Company granted 34 million shares as equity awards in the third quarter of 2010, of which 30 million shares were issued as "stock salary." Except for shares withheld by Citigroup recorded a pretax net restructuring release of $34 million composed of a gross charge of $12 million and a credit of $46 million due to changes in estimates. The charges relatedsatisfy tax withholding obligations, shares delivered as stock salary are subject to sale restrictions. Stock salary, with respect to the 2008 Re-engineering Projects Restructuring Initiative are reportedfirst nine months of fiscal year 2010, will become transferable in nine equal monthly installments beginning on January 20, 2011. Shares with respect to any subsequent months in 2010 will become transferable approximately one year after the Restructuring line on the Company's Consolidated Statementeffective date of Income and are recorded in each segment.their delivery.

                  In 2007, the Company completed a review of its structural expense base in a Company-wide effort to create a more streamlined organization, reduce expense growth, and provide investment funds for future growth initiatives. As a result of this review, a pretax restructuring charge of $1.4 billion was recorded inCorporate/Other during the first quarter of 2007. Additional net charges of $151 million were recognized in subsequent quarters throughout 2007, and net releases of $31 million and $3 million in 2008 and 2009, due to changes in estimates. The charges related to the 2007 Structural Expense Review Restructuring Initiative are reported in the Restructuring line on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

                  The primary goals of the 2008 Re-engineering Projects Restructuring Initiative and the 2007 Structural Expense Review Restructuring Initiative were:

            eliminate layers of management/improve workforce management;

            consolidate certain back-office, middle-office and corporate functions;

            increase the use of shared services;

            expand centralized procurement; and

            continue to rationalize operational spending on technology.

                  The implementation of these restructuring initiatives also caused certain related premises and equipment assets to become redundant. The remaining depreciable lives of these assets were shortened, and accelerated depreciation charges began in the second quarter of 2007 and fourth quarter of 2008 for the 2007 and 2008 initiatives, respectively, in addition to normal scheduled depreciation.


          Table of Contents

                  The following tables detail the Company's restructuring reserves.

          2008 Re-engineering Projects Restructuring Charges

           
           Severance  
            
            
            
           
           
           Contract
          termination
          costs
           Asset
          write-downs(3)
           Employee
          termination
          cost
           Total
          Citigroup
           
          In millions of dollars ASC 712(1) ASC 420(2) 

          Total Citigroup (pretax)

                             

          Original restructuring charge

           $1,254 $79 $55 $123 $19 $1,530 
                        

          Utilization

            (114) (3) (2) (100)   (219)
                        

          Balance at December 31, 2008

           $1,140 $76 $53 $23 $19 $1,311 
                        

          Additional charge

           $14 $6 $4 $5 $ $29 

          Foreign exchange

            (14)     (12) (1) (27)

          Utilization

            (541) (76) (11) (7) (5) (640)

          Changes in estimates

            (38) (1)       (39)
                        

          Balance at March 31, 2009

           $561 $5 $46 $9 $13 $634 
                        

          Additional charge

           $6 $17 $1 $1 $ $25 

          Foreign exchange

            26    2  1    29 

          Utilization

            (190) (19) (8) (3) (1) (221)

          Changes in estimates

            (53) (1) (1)   (2) (57)
                        

          Balance at June 30, 2009

           $350 $2 $40 $8 $10 $410 
                        

          Additional charge

           $ $5 $6 $1 $ $12 

          Foreign exchange

            3    1      4 

          Utilization

            (84) (6) (6) (2)   (98)

          Changes in estimates

            (38)   (2) (4) (2) (46)
                        

          Balance at September 30, 2009

           $231 $1 $39 $3 $8 $282 
                        

          Note: The total Citigroup charge in the table above does not include a $51 million one-time pension curtailment charge related to this restructuring initiative, which is recorded as part of the Company'sRestructuring charge in the Consolidated Statement of Income at December 31, 2008.

          2007 Structural Expense Review Restructuring Charges

           
           Severance  
            
            
            
           
           
           Contract
          termination
          costs
           Asset
          write-downs(3)
           Employee
          termination
          cost
           Total
          Citigroup
           
          In millions of dollars ASC 712(1) ASC 420(2) 

          Total Citigroup (pretax)

                             

          Original restructuring charge

           $950 $11 $25 $352 $39 $1,377 
                        

          Additional charge

           $42 $96 $29 $27 $11 $205 

          Foreign exchange

            19    2      21 

          Utilization

            (547) (75) (28) (363) (33) (1,046)

          Changes in estimates

            (39)   (6) (1) (8) (54)
                        

          Balance at December 31, 2007

           $425 $32 $22 $15 $9 $503 
                        

          Additional charge

           $10 $14 $43 $6 $ $73 

          Foreign exchange

            (11)   (4)     (15)

          Utilization

            (288) (34) (22) (7) (6) (357)

          Changes in estimates

            (93) (2) (2) (4) (3) (104)
                        

          Balance at December 31, 2008

           $43 $10 $37 $10 $ $100 
                        

          Foreign exchange

            (1)   (1)     (2)

          Utilization

            (41) (10) (35) (9)   (95)

          Changes in estimates

            (1)   (1) (1)   (3)
                        

          Balance at March 31, 2009

           $ $ $ $ $ $ 
                        

          (1)
          Accounted for in accordance with ASC 712 (SFAS No. 112,Employer's Accounting for Post Employment Benefits).

          (2)
          Accounted for in accordance with ASC 420 (SFAS No. 146,Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities).

          (3)
          Accounted for in accordance with ASC 360 (SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets).

          Note: The 2007 structural expense review restructuring initiative was fully utilized as of March 31, 2009.


          Table of Contents

                  The total restructuring reserve balance and total charges as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 related to the 2008 Re-engineering Projects Restructuring Initiatives are presented below by business in the following tables. These charges are reported in the Restructuring line on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income and are recorded in each business.

          2008 Re-engineering Projects

           
           For the quarter ended September 30, 2009 
          In millions of dollars Total
          restructuring
          reserve
          balance as of
          September 30,
          2009
           Restructuring
          charges
          recorded in the
          three months
          ended September 30,
          2009
           Total
          restructuring
          charges since
          inception(1)(2)
           

          Citicorp

           $132 $5 $846 

          Citi Holdings

            14  1  239 

          Corporate/Other

            136  6  369 
                  

          Total Citigroup (pretax)

           $282 $12 $1,454 
                  

          (1)
          Excludes pension curtailment charges of $51 million recorded during the fourth quarter of 2008.

          (2)
          Amounts shown net of $46 million, $57 million and $39 million related to changes in estimates recorded during the third, second and first quarters of 2009, respectively.

           
           For the year ended December 31, 2008 
          In millions of dollars Total
          restructuring
          reserve
          balance as of
          December 31,
          2008
           Total
          restructuring
          charges(1)
           

          Citicorp

           $789 $890 

          Citi Holdings

            184  267 

          Corporate/Other

            338  373 
                

          Total Citigroup (pretax)

           $1,311 $1,530 
                

          (1)
          Represents the total charges incurred since inception and excludes pension curtailment charges of $51 million recorded during the fourth quarter of 2008.

          Table of Contents

          8.    EARNINGS PER SHARE

                  The following is a reconciliation of the income and share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) computations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:30:

           
           Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 
          In millions, except per share amounts 2009 2008(1) 2009 2008(1) 

          Income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

           $593 $(3,521)$6,674 $(11,036)

          Noncontrolling interest

            74  (93) 24  (37)
                    

          Net income (loss) from continuing operations (for EPS purposes)

           $519 $(3,428)$6,650 $(10,999)

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

            (418) 613  (677) 578 
                    

          Citigroup's net income (loss)

           $101 $(2,815)$5,973 $(10,421)

          Preferred dividends

            (272) (389) (2,988) (833)

          Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance(2)

                (1,285)  

          Preferred stock Series H discount accretion

            (16)   (123)  

          Impact of the Public and Private Preferred Stock exchange offer

            (3,055)   (3,055)  
                    

          Income (loss) available to common stockholders

            (3,242) (3,204) (1,478) (11,254)

          Allocation of dividends to common stock and participating securities, net of forfeitures

              (1,738) (63) (5,151)

          Undistributed earnings (loss) for basic EPS(3)

            (3,242) (4,942) (1,541) (16,405)

          Effect of dilutive securities

              270  540  606 
                    

          Undistributed earnings (loss) for diluted EPS(4)

           $(3,242)$(4,672)$(1,001)$(15,799)
                    

          Weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS

            12,104.3  5,341.8  7,629.6  5,238.3 

          Effect of dilutive securities:

                       

          Convertible securities

            111.7  489.2  416.1  489.2 

          Options

              0.1    0.4 
                    

          Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS(3)

            12,216.0  5,831.1  8,045.7  5,727.9 
                    

          Basic earnings per share(3)(4)

                       

          Income (loss) from continuing operations

           $(0.23)$(0.72)$(0.10)$(2.28)

          Discontinued operations

            (0.04) 0.11  (0.09) 0.11 
                    

          Net income (loss)

           $(0.27)$(0.61)$(0.19)$(2.17)

          Diluted earnings per share(3)(4)

                       

          Income (loss) from continuing operations

           $(0.23)$(0.72)$(0.10)$(2.28)

          Discontinued operations

            (0.04) 0.11  (0.09) 0.11 
                    

          Net income (loss)

           $(0.27)$(0.61)$(0.19)$(2.17)
                    
           
           Three Months
          Ended September 30,
           Nine Months
          Ended September 30,
           
          In millions, except per-share amounts 2010 2009 2010 2009 

          Income before attribution of noncontrolling interests

           $2,601 $593 $9,578 $6,674 

          Noncontrolling interests from continuing operations

            110  74  170  24 
                    

          Net income from continuing operations (for EPS purposes)

           $2,491 $519 $9,408 $6,650 

          Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

            (374) (418) (166) (677)

          Noncontrolling interests from discontinuing operations

            (51)   (51)  
                    

          Citigroup's net income

           $2,168 $101 $9,293 $5,973 

          Less:

                       
           

          Preferred dividends

              272    2,988 
           

          Impact of the conversion price reset related to the $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock private issuance

                  1,285 
           

          Preferred stock Series H discount accretion

              16    123 
           

          Impact of the Public and Private preferred stock exchange offer

              3,055    3,055 
           

          Dividends and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities

            20    78  2 
                    

          Net income (loss) allocated to unrestricted common shareholders for basic EPS

           $2,148 $(3,242)$9,215 $(1,480)

          Effect of dilutive securities

            1    2  540 
                    

          Net income (loss) allocated to unrestricted common shareholders for diluted EPS

           $2,149 $(3,242)$9,217 $(940)
                    

          Weighted-average common shares outstanding applicable to basic EPS

            28,877.5  12,104.3  28,723.7  7,629.6 

          Effect of dilutive securities

                       
           

          TDECs

            876.2    878.4   
           

          Other employee plans

            23.9    17.5   
           

          Convertible securities

            0.7  111.7  0.7  416.1 
           

          Options

                1.2   
                    

          Adjusted weighted-average common shares outstanding applicable to diluted EPS

            29,778.3  12,216.0  29,621.5  8,045.7 
                    

          Basic earnings per share

                       

          Income (loss) from continuing operations

           $0.09 $(0.23)$0.32 $(0.10)

          Discontinued operations

            (0.02) (0.04)   (0.09)
                    

          Net income (loss)

           $0.07 $(0.27)$0.32 $(0.19)
                    

          Diluted earnings per share

                       

          Income (loss) from continuing operations

           $0.08 $(0.23)$0.32 $(0.10)

          Discontinued operations

            (0.01) (0.04) (0.01) (0.09)
                    

          Net income (loss)

           $0.07 $(0.27)$0.31 $(0.19)
                    

          (1)
          The Company adopted ASC 260-10-45

                  During the third quarters of 2010 and 2009, weighted-average options to 65 (FSP EITF 03-6-1) on January 1, 2009. All prior periods have been restated to conformpurchase 384.7 million and 100.5 million shares of common stock, respectively, were outstanding but not included in the computation of earnings per common share, because the weighted-average exercise prices of $9.58 and $41.29, respectively, were greater than the average market price of the Company's common stock during the quarter.

                  Warrants issued to the current period's presentation.

          (2)
          ForU.S. Treasury as part of the nine months ended September 30, 2009, income available to common shareholders includes a reduction of $1,285 million related toTroubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and the conversion price reset pursuant to Citigroup's priorloss-sharing agreement, with exercise prices of $17.85 and $10.61 for approximately 210 million and 255 million shares of common stock, respectively, were not included in the purchaserscomputation of $12.5 billion convertible preferred stock issuedearnings per common share in 2010 and 2009, because they were anti-dilutive.

                  Equity awards granted under the Management Committee Long-Term Incentive Plan (MC LTIP) were not included in the 2009 computation of earnings per common share, because the performance targets under the terms of the awards were not met and, as a private offeringresult, the awards expired in January 2008. The conversion price was reset from $31.62the first quarter of 2010. In addition, the other performance-based equity awards of approximately 5 million shares were not included in the third quarters of 2010 and 2009 earnings per share to $26.35 per share.

          (3)
          Due tocalculation, because the net loss available toperformance targets under the terms of the awards were not met.

                  Equity units convertible into approximately 118 million shares and 235 million shares of Citigroup common shareholders for Basic EPSstock held by the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA) were not included in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, loss available to common stockholders for basic EPS was used to calculate Dilutedcomputation of earnings per share. Adding back the effect of dilutive securities would result in anti-dilution.

          (4)
          Due to the net loss available to common shareholders for Diluted EPSshare in the threethird quarters of 2010 and nine months ended September 30, 2009, and 2008, basic shares were used to calculate Diluted earnings per share. Adding dilutive securities torespectively, because the denominator would result in anti-dilution.
          exercise price of $31.83 was greater than the average market price of the Company's common stock.


          Table of Contents

          9.    TRADING ACCOUNT ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

                  Trading account assets andTrading account liabilities, at fair value, consisted of the following at September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:

          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
           In millions of dollars September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           

          Trading account assets

          Trading account assets

           

          Trading account assets

           

          Trading mortgage-backed securities

           

          Mortgage-backed securities(1)

          Mortgage-backed securities(1)

           

          Agency guaranteed

           $23,549 $32,981 

          U.S. government agency guaranteed

           $23,782 $20,638 

          Prime

           1,177 1,416 

          Prime

           1,798 1,156 

          Alt-A

           1,305 913 

          Alt-A

           1,416 1,229 

          Subprime

           10,638 14,552 

          Subprime

           1,854 9,734 

          Non-U.S. residential

           1,923 2,447 

          Non-U.S. residential

           2,829 2,368 

          Commercial

           3,975 2,501 

          Commercial

           3,296 3,455 
                     

          Total trading mortgage-backed securities

           $42,567 $54,810 

          Total mortgage-backed securities(1)

          Total mortgage-backed securities(1)

           $34,975 $38,580 
                     

          U.S. Treasury and Federal Agencies

           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

           

          U.S. Treasuries

           $20,803 $7,370 

          U.S. Treasuries

           $23,785 $28,938 

          Agency and direct obligations

           3,933 4,017 

          Agency and direct obligations

           4,173 2,041 
                     

          Total U.S. Treasury and Federal Agencies

           $24,736 $11,387 

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

           $27,958 $30,979 
                     

          State and municipal securities

          State and municipal securities

           $7,196 $9,510 

          State and municipal securities

           6,729 $7,147 

          Foreign government securities

          Foreign government securities

           66,425 57,422 

          Foreign government securities

           98,200 72,769 

          Corporate

          Corporate

           47,485 54,654 

          Corporate

           51,989 51,985 

          Derivatives(1)

           68,670 115,289 

          Derivatives(2)

          Derivatives(2)

           55,560 58,879 

          Equity securities

          Equity securities

           46,463 48,503 

          Equity securities

           37,117 46,221 

          Asset-backed securities(1)

          Asset-backed securities(1)

           9,681 4,089 

          Other debt securities

          Other debt securities

           37,155 26,060 

          Other debt securities

           14,889 32,124 
                     

          Total trading account assets

          Total trading account assets

           $340,697 $377,635 

          Total trading account assets

           $337,098 $342,773 
                     

          Trading account liabilities

          Trading account liabilities

           

          Trading account liabilities

           

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

           $67,988 $50,693 

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

           $79,539 $73,406 

          Derivatives(1)

           62,552 115,107 

          Derivatives(2)

          Derivatives(2)

           62,466 64,106 
                     

          Total trading account liabilities

          Total trading account liabilities

           $130,540 $165,800 

          Total trading account liabilities

           $142,005 $137,512 
                     

          (1)
          The Company invests in mortgage-backed securities and asset-backed securities. Mortgage securitizations are generally considered VIEs. The Company's maximum exposure to loss from these VIEs is equal to the carrying amount of the securities, which is reflected in the table above. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations in which the Company has other involvement, information is provided in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

          (2)
          Presented net, pursuant to master netting agreements. See Note 1615 to the Consolidated Financial Statements Derivatives Activities, for a discussion regarding the accounting and reporting for derivatives.

          Table of Contents

          10.    INVESTMENTS

          In millions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
            September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           

          Securities available-for-sale

           $190,252 $175,189  $295,682 $239,599 

          Debt securities held-to-maturity(1)

           55,816 64,459  30,107 51,527 

          Non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value(2)

           7,765 9,262  6,427 6,830 

          Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost(3)

           8,057 7,110  8,034 8,163 
                    

          Total investments

           $261,890 $256,020  $340,250 $306,119 
                    

          (1)
          Recorded at amortized cost.cost, less impairment on securities that have credit-related impairment.

          (2)
          Unrealized gains and losses for non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value are recognized in earnings.

          (3)
          Non-marketable equity securities carried at cost primarily consist of shares issued by the Federal Reserve Bank, Federal Home Loan Bank, foreign central banks and various clearing houses of which Citigroup is a member.

          Securities Available-for-Sale

                  The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale (AFS) at September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 20082009 were as follows:



           September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008(1) 
           September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars Amortized
          cost
           Gross
          unrealized
          gains
           Gross
          unrealized
          losses
           Fair
          value
           Amortized
          cost
           Gross
          unrealized
          gains
           Gross
          unrealized
          losses
           Fair
          value
           In millions of dollars Amortized
          cost
           Gross
          unrealized
          gains
           Gross
          unrealized
          Losses
           Fair
          value
           Amortized
          cost
           Gross
          unrealized
          gains
           Gross
          unrealized
          losses
           Fair
          value
           

          Debt securities available-for-sale:

           

          Debt securities AFS

          Debt securities AFS

           

          Mortgage-backed securities(1)

          Mortgage-backed securities(1)

           

          Mortgage-backed securities(1)

           

          U.S. government agency guaranteed

           $23,163 $487 $31 $23,619 $23,527 $261 $67 $23,721 

          U.S. government-agency guaranteed

           $22,197 $605 $45 $22,757 $20,625 $339 $50 $20,914 

          Prime

           7,436 102 1,260 6,278 8,475 3 2,965 5,513 

          Prime

           2,687 28 224 2,491 7,291 119 932 6,478 

          Alt-A

           390 86 6 470 54  9 45 

          Alt-A

           69 3 1 71 538 93 4 627 

          Subprime

           36  17 19 38  21 17 

          Subprime

           1   1 1   1 

          Non-U.S. residential

           271  5 266 185 2  187 

          Non-U.S. residential

           340 1 1 340 258  3 255 

          Commercial

           919 10 120 809 519  134 385 

          Commercial

           587 28 19 596 883 10 100 793 
                                             

          Total mortgage-backed securities

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           32,215 685 1,439 31,461 32,798 266 3,196 29,868 

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           $25,881 $665 $290 $26,256 $29,596 $561 $1,089 $29,068 

          U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

          U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

           

          U.S. Treasury

           6,194 41 1 6,234 3,465 125  3,590 

          U.S. Treasury

           64,802 1,097 2 65,897 26,857 36 331 26,562 

          Agency obligations

           16,897 84 14 16,967 20,237 215 77 20,375 

          Agency obligations

           48,750 400 4 49,146 27,714 46 208 27,552 
                                             

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

           23,091 125 15 23,201 23,702 340 77 23,965 

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

           $113,552 $1,497 $6 $115,043 $54,571 $82 $539 $54,114 

          State and municipal

          State and municipal

           17,967 197 1,339 16,825 18,156 38 4,370 13,824 

          State and municipal

           16,391 293 2,118 14,566 16,677 147 1,214 15,610 

          Foreign government

          Foreign government

           79,965 974 268 80,671 79,505 945 408 80,042 

          Foreign government

           102,718 1,349 212 103,855 101,987 860 328 102,519 

          Corporate

          Corporate

           20,444 436 172 20,708 10,646 65 680 10,031 

          Corporate

           17,161 476 39 17,598 20,024 435 146 20,313 

          Asset-backed securities(1)

          Asset-backed securities(1)

           10,260 42 72 10,230 10,089 50 93 10,046 

          Other debt securities

          Other debt securities

           11,701 201 255 11,647 11,784 36 224 11,596 

          Other debt securities

           2,202 34 95 2,141 2,179 21 77 2,123 
                                             

          Total debt securities available- for-sale

           185,383 2,618 3,488 184,513 176,591 1,690 8,955 169,326 

          Total debt securities AFS

          Total debt securities AFS

           $288,165 $4,356 $2,832 $289,689 $235,123 $2,156 $3,486 $233,793 
                                             

          Marketable equity securities available-for-sale

           4,065 1,929 255 5,739 5,768 554 459 5,863 

          Marketable equity securities AFS

          Marketable equity securities AFS

           $3,834 $2,433 $274 $5,993 $4,089 $1,929 $212 $5,806 
                                             

          Total securities available-for-sale

           $189,448 $4,547 $3,743 $190,252 $182,359 $2,244 $9,414 $175,189 

          Total securities AFS

          Total securities AFS

           $291,999 $6,789 $3,106 $295,682 $239,212 $4,085 $3,698 $239,599 
                                             

          (1)
          ReclassifiedThe Company invests in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. These securitizations are generally considered VIEs. The Company's maximum exposure to conformloss from these VIEs is equal to the current period's presentation.carrying amount of the securities, which is reflected in the table above. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations in which the Company has other involvement, information is provided in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

                  The        As discussed in more detail below, the Company conducts and documents periodic reviews of all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is other than temporary. As discussed in more detail below, prior to January 1, 2009, these reviews were conducted pursuant to FASB Staff Position No. 115-1,The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments (ASC 320-10-35).other-than-temporary. Any unrealized loss identified as other than temporary was recorded directly in the Consolidated Statement of Income. As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted ASC 320-10-65-1 (FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2). Accordingly, any credit-related impairment related to debt securities the Company does not planintend to sell and is more-likely-than-not will not likely to be required to sell is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income, with the non-credit-related impairment recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI).OCI. For other impaired debt securities that the Company intends to sell, the entire impairment is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.


          Table of Contents

          The table below shows the fair value of investments in AFS securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months or for 12 months or longer as of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:



           Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total 
           Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total 
          In millions of dollar Fair
          value
           Gross
          unrealized
          losses
           Fair
          value
           Gross
          unrealized
          losses
           Fair
          value
           Gross
          unrealized
          losses
           

          September 30, 2009

           

          Securities available-for-sale

           
          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars Fair
          value
           Gross
          unrealized
          losses
           Fair
          value
           Gross
          unrealized
          losses
           Fair
          value
           Gross
          unrealized
          losses
           

          September 30, 2010

          September 30, 2010

           

          Securities AFS

          Securities AFS

           

          Mortgage-backed securities

          Mortgage-backed securities

           

          Mortgage-backed securities

           

          U.S. government agency guaranteed

           $3,024 $23 $300 $8 $3,324 $31 

          U.S. government-agency guaranteed

           $5,474 $45 $18 $ $5,492 $45 

          Prime

           4,999 1,224 268 36 5,267 1,260 

          Prime

           169 4 1,822 220 1,991 224 

          Alt-A

           90  47 6 137 6 

          Alt-A

           10  2 1 12 1 

          Subprime

           4  13 17 17 17 

          Subprime

                 

          Non-U.S. residential

           266 5   266 5 

          Non-U.S. residential

             209 1 209 1 

          Commercial

           84 64 389 56 473 120 

          Commercial

           48 12 50 7 98 19 
                                     

          Total mortgage-backed securities

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           8,467 1,316 1,017 123 9,484 1,439 

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           $5,701 $61 $2,101 $229 $7,802 $290 

          U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

          U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

           

          U.S. Treasury

           97  61 1 158 1 

          U.S. Treasury

           2,456 2 51  2,507 2 

          Agency obligations

           2,995 14 1  2,996 14 

          Agency obligations

           3,847 4 1  3,848 4 
                                     

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

           3,092 14 62 1 3,154 15 

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

           $6,303 $6 $52 $ $6,355 $6 

          State and municipal

          State and municipal

           4,321 214 877 1,125 5,198 1,339 

          State and municipal

           880 40 11,897 2,078 12,777 2,118 

          Foreign government

          Foreign government

           22,290 129 5,732 139 28,022 268 

          Foreign government

           23,085 116 4,588 96 27,673 212 

          Corporate

          Corporate

           956 56 1,266 116 2,222 172 

          Corporate

           656 22 305 17 961 39 

          Asset-backed securities

          Asset-backed securities

           280 8 303 64 583 72 

          Other debt securities

          Other debt securities

           1,183 93 1,378 162 2,561 255 

          Other debt securities

             632 95 632 95 

          Marketable equity securities available-for-sale

           2,555 225 117 30 2,672 255 

          Marketable equity securities AFS

          Marketable equity securities AFS

           69 31 2,033 243 2,102 274 
                                     

          Total securities available-for-sale

           $42,864 $2,047 $10,449 $1,696 $53,313 $3,743 

          Total securities AFS

          Total securities AFS

           $36,974 $284 $21,911 $2,822 $58,885 $3,106 
                                     

          December 31, 2008(1)

           

          Securities available-for-sale

           

          December 31, 2009

          December 31, 2009

           

          Securities AFS

          Securities AFS

           

          Mortgage-backed securities

          Mortgage-backed securities

           

          Mortgage-backed securities

           

          U.S. government agency guaranteed

           $5,281 $9 $432 $58 $5,713 $67 

          U.S. government-agency guaranteed

           $6,793 $47 $263 $3 $7,056 $50 

          Prime

           2,258 1,127 3,108 1,838 5,366 2,965 

          Prime

           5,074 905 228 27 5,302 932 

          Alt-A

           38 8 5 1 43 9 

          Alt-A

           106  35 4 141 4 

          Subprime

             15 21 15 21 

          Subprime

                 

          Non-U.S. residential

           10    10  

          Non-U.S. residential

           250 3   250 3 

          Commercial

           213 33 233 101 446 134 

          Commercial

           93 2 259 98 352 100 
                                     

          Total mortgage-backed securities

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           7,800 1,177 3,793 2,019 11,593 3,196 

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           $12,316 $957 $785 $132 $13,101 $1,089 

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

          U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

           

          U.S. Treasury

                 

          U.S. Treasury

           23,378 224 308 107 23,686 331 

          Agency obligations

           1,654 76 1 1 1,655 77 

          Agency obligations

           17,957 208 7  17,964 208 
                                     

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

           1,654 76 1 1 1,655 77 

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

           $41,335 $432 $315 $107 $41,650 $539 

          State and municipal

          State and municipal

           12,827 3,872 3,762 498 16,589 4,370 

          State and municipal

           769 97 12,508 1,117 13,277 1,214 

          Foreign government

          Foreign government

           10,697 201 9,080 207 19,777 408 

          Foreign government

           39,241 217 10,398 111 49,639 328 

          Corporate

          Corporate

           1,985 270 4,393 410 6,378 680 

          Corporate

           1,165 47 907 99 2,072 146 

          Asset-backed securities

          Asset-backed securities

           627 4 986 89 1,613 93 

          Other debt securities

          Other debt securities

           944 96 303 128 1,247 224 

          Other debt securities

           28 2 647 75 675 77 

          Marketable equity securities available-for-sale

           3,254 386 102 73 3,356 459 

          Marketable equity securities AFS

          Marketable equity securities AFS

           102 4 2,526 208 2,628 212 
                                     

          Total securities available-for-sale

           $39,161 $6,078 $21,434 $3,336 $60,595 $9,414 

          Total securitiesAFS

          Total securitiesAFS

           $95,583 $1,760 $29,072 $1,938 $124,655 $3,698 
                                     

          (1)
          Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

          Table of Contents

                  The following table presents the amortized cost and fair value of AFS debt securities available-for-sale by contractual maturity dates as of September 30, 2009,2010 and December 31, 2008:2009:


           September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008(1)
            September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
          In millions of dollars Amortized
          Cost
           Fair
          value
           Amortized
          cost
           Fair
          value
            Amortized
          Cost
           Fair
          value
           Amortized
          cost
           Fair
          value
           

          Mortgage-backed securities(2)(1)

            

          Due within 1 year

           $2 $2 $87 $80  $ $ $2 $3 

          After 1 but within 5 years

           29 30 639 567  396 392 16 16 

          After 5 but within 10 years

           690 658 1,362 1,141  418 440 626 597 

          After 10 years(3)

           31,494 30,771 30,710 28,080 

          After 10 years(2)

           25,067 25,424 28,952 28,452 
                            

          Total

           $32,215 $31,461 $32,798 $29,868  $25,881 $26,256 $29,596 $29,068 
                            

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies

            

          Due within 1 year

           $5,546 $5,556 $15,736 $15,846  $21,716 $21,734 $5,357 $5,366 

          After 1 but within 5 years

           7,600 7,629 5,755 5,907  70,324 71,097 35,912 35,618 

          After 5 but within 10 years

           6,535 6,593 1,902 1,977  18,502 19,094 8,815 8,773 

          After 10 years(3)

           3,410 3,423 309 235 

          After 10 years(2)

           3,010 3,118 4,487 4,357 
                            

          Total

           $23,091 $23,201 $23,702 $23,965  $113,552 $115,043 $54,571 $54,114 
                            

          State and municipal

            

          Due within 1 year

           $219 $219 $214 $214  $80 $47 $7 $8 

          After 1 but within 5 years

           111 121 84 84  49 141 119 129 

          After 5 but within 10 years

           354 381 411 406  399 245 340 359 

          After 10 years(3)

           17,283 16,104 17,447 13,120 

          After 10 years(2)

           15,863 14,133 16,211 15,114 
                            

          Total

           $17,967 $16,825 $18,156 $13,824  $16,391 $14,566 $16,677 $15,610 
                            

          Foreign government

            

          Due within 1 year

           $34,753 $34,824 $26,481 $26,937  $39,362 $39,386 $32,223 $32,365 

          After 1 but within 5 years

           37,442 37,945 45,652 45,462  55,127 55,794 61,165 61,426 

          After 5 but within 10 years

           6,711 6,706 6,771 6,899  7,283 7,506 7,844 7,845 

          After 10 years(3)

           1,059 1,196 601 744 

          After 10 years(2)

           946 1,169 755 883 
                            

          Total

           $79,965 $80,671 $79,505 $80,042  $102,718 $103,855 $101,987 $102,519 
                            

          All other(4)(3)

            

          Due within 1 year

           $2,893 $2,883 $4,160 $4,319  $3,321 $3,309 $4,243 $4,244 

          After 1 but within 5 years

           23,456 23,711 2,662 2,692  13,483 13,629 14,286 14,494 

          After 5 but within 10 years

           3,282 3,327 12,557 11,842  8,491 8,683 9,483 9,597 

          After 10 years(3)

           2,514 2,434 3,051 2,774 

          After 10 years(2)

           4,328 4,348 4,280 4,147 
                            

          Total

           $32,145 $32,355 $22,430 $21,627  $29,623 $29,969 $32,292 $32,482 
                            

          Total debt securities available-for-sale

           $185,383 $184,513 $176,591 $169,326 

          Total debt securities AFS

           $288,165 $289,689 $235,123 $233,793 
                            

          (1)
          Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.

          (2)
          Includes mortgage-backed securities of U.S. federal agencies.

          (3)(2)
          Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.

          (4)(3)
          Includes corporate securities and other debt securities.

                  The following tables present interest and dividends on all investments for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:

           
           Three months ended 
          In millions of dollars Sept 30,
          2009
           Sept 30,
          2008
           

          Taxable interest

           $2,956 $2,334 

          Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax

            226  136 

          Dividends

            101  127 
                

          Total interest and dividends

           $3,283 $2,597 
                


           
           Three months ended Nine months ended 
          In millions of dollars September 30,
          2010
           September 30,
          2009
           September 30,
          2010
           September 30,
          2009
           

          Taxable interest

           $2,353 $2,956 $7,896 $9,084 

          Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax

            185  226  555  591 

          Dividends

            73  101  255  219 
                    

          Total interest and dividends

           $2,611 $3,283 $8,706 $9,894 
                    
           
           Nine months ended 
          In millions of dollars Sept 30,
          2009
           Sept 30,
          2008
           

          Taxable interest

           $9,084 $7,019 

          Interest exempt from U.S. federal income tax

            591  433 

          Dividends

            219  380 
                

          Total interest and dividends

           $9,894 $7,832 
                

          Table of Contents

                  The following table presents realized gains and losses on all investments for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 20092010 and 2008.2009. The gross realized investment losses exclude losses from other-than-temporary impairment:


           Three months ended Nine months ended  Three months ended Nine months ended 
          In millions of dollars Sept 30,
          2009
           Sept 30,
          2008
           Sept 30,
          2009
           Sept 30,
          2008
            September 30,
          2010
           September 30,
          2009
           September 30,
          2010
           September 30,
          2009
           

          Gross realized investment gains

           $439 $192 $1,797 $506  $1,133 $439 $2,280 $1,797 

          Gross realized investment losses(1)

           (12) (42) (78) (130) (171) (12) (257) (78)
                            

          Net realized gains (losses)

           $427 $150 $1,719 $376 

          Net realized gains

           $962 $427 $2,023 $1,719 
                            

          Table


          (1)
          During the first quarter of Contents

          2010, the Company sold four corporate debt securities that were classified as held-to-maturity. These sales were in response to a significant deterioration in the creditworthiness of the issuers. The securities sold had a carrying value of $413 million, and the Company recorded a realized loss of $49 million.

          Debt Securities Held-to-Maturity

                  The carrying value and fair value of securities held-to-maturity (HTM) at September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 20082009 were as follows:

          In millions of dollars Amortized
          cost(1)
           Net unrealized
          loss recognized
          in OCI
           Carrying
          value(2)
           Gross
          unrecognized
          gains
           Gross
          unrecognized
          losses
           Fair
          value
           

          September 30, 2009

                             

          Debt securities held-to-maturity

                             

          Mortgage-backed securities

                             
           

          U.S. government agency guaranteed

           $ $ $ $ $ $ 
           

          Prime

            6,388  1,211  5,177  50  50  5,177 
           

          Alt-A

            15,436  4,609  10,827  411  419  10,819 
           

          Subprime

            1,165  171  994  56  117  933 
           

          Non-U.S. residential

            9,485  1,168  8,317  364  240  8,441 
           

          Commercial

            1,308  52  1,256    377  879 
                        
           

          Total mortgage-backed securities

            33,782  7,211  26,571  881  1,203  26,249 

          U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                             
           

          U.S. Treasury

                       
           

          Agency and direct obligations

                       
                        
           

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                       

          State and municipal

            3,169  146  3,023  200  138  3,085 

          Corporate

            7,365  307  7,058  472  138  7,392 

          Asset-backed securities

            19,590  427  19,163  435  722  18,876 

          Other debt securities

            7  6  1      1 
                        

          Total debt securities held-to-maturity

           $63,913 $8,097 $55,816 $1,988 $2,201 $55,603 
                        

          December 31, 2008

                             

          Debt securities held-to-maturity

                             

          Mortgage-backed securities

                             
           

          U.S. government agency guaranteed

           $ $ $ $ $ $ 
           

          Prime

            7,481  1,436  6,045    623  5,422 
           

          Alt-A

            16,658  4,216  12,442  23  1,802  10,663 
           

          Subprime

            1,368  125  1,243  15  163  1,095 
           

          Non-U.S. residential

            10,496  1,128  9,368  5  397  8,976 
           

          Commercial

            1,021    1,021    130  891 
                        
           

          Total mortgage-backed securities

            37,024  6,905  30,119  43  3,115  27,047 

          U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                             
           

          U.S. Treasury

            1    1      1 
           

          Agency and direct obligations

                       
                        
           

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

            1    1      1 

          State and municipal

            3,371  183  3,188  14  253  2,949 

          Corporate

            6,906  175  6,731  130  305  6,556 

          Asset-backed securities

            22,698  415  22,283  86  555  21,814 

          Other debt securities

            2,478  341  2,137    127  2,010 
                        

          Total debt securities held-to-maturity

           $72,478 $8,019 $64,459 $273 $4,355 $60,377 
                        
          In millions of dollars Amortized
          cost(1)
           Net unrealized
          loss
          recognized in
          AOCI
           Carrying
          value(2)
           Gross
          unrecognized
          gains
           Gross
          unrecognized
          losses
           Fair
          value
           

          September 30, 2010

                             

          Debt securities HTM(3)

                             

          Mortgage-backed securities

                             
           

          Prime

           $4,963 $870 $4,093 $491 $11 $4,573 
           

          Alt-A

            12,314  3,318  8,996  774  153  9,617 
           

          Subprime

            731  86  645  10  61  594 
           

          Non-U.S. residential

            5,362  842  4,520  331  63  4,788 
           

          Commercial

            948  24  924    115  809 
                        
           

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           $24,318 $5,140 $19,178 $1,606 $403 $20,381 

          State and municipal

            2,612  129  2,483  100  55  2,528 

          Corporate

            6,717  170  6,547  494  101  6,940 

          Asset-backed securities(3)

            1,974  75  1,899  62  60  1,901 

          Other debt securities

                       
                        

          Total debt securities HTM

           $35,621 $5,514 $30,107 $2,262 $619 $31,750 
                        

          December 31, 2009

                             

          Debt securities HTM(3)

                             

          Mortgage-backed securities

                             
           

          Prime

           $6,118 $1,151 $4,967 $317 $5 $5,279 
           

          Alt-A

            14,710  4,276  10,434  905  243  11,096 
           

          Subprime

            1,087  128  959  77  100  936 
           

          Non-U.S. residential

            9,002  1,119  7,883  469  134  8,218 
           

          Commercial

            1,303  45  1,258  1  208  1,051 
                        
           

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           $32,220 $6,719 $25,501 $1,769 $690 $26,580 

          State and municipal

            3,067  147  2,920  92  113  2,899 

          Corporate

            7,457  264  7,193  524  182  7,535 

          Asset-backed securities(3)

            16,348  435  15,913  567  496  15,984 

          Other debt securities

                       
                        

          Total debt securities HTM

           $59,092 $7,565 $51,527 $2,952 $1,481 $52,998 
                        

          (1)
          For securities transferred to HTM fromTrading account assets, amortized cost is defined as the fair value amount of the securities at the date of transfer plus any accretion income and less any impairments recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer. For securities transferred to HTM from AFS, amortized cost is defined as the original purchase cost, plus or minus any accretion or amortization of interest,a purchase discount or premium, less any impairment previously recognized in earnings.

          (2)
          HTM securities are carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at amortized cost and the changes in the value of these securities other than impairment charges are not reported on the financial statements.

          (3)
          The Company invests in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. These securitizations are generally considered variable interest entities (VIEs). The Company's maximum exposure to loss from these VIEs is equal to the carrying amount of the securities, which is reflected in the table above. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations in which the Company has other involvement, information is provided in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

          Table of Contents

                  The net unrealized losses classified in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI)AOCI relate to debt securities reclassified from AFS investments to HTM investments, and to additionalinvestments. Additionally, for HTM securities that have suffered credit impairment, declines in fair value for HTM securities that sufferreasons other than credit impairment.losses are recorded in AOCI. The AOCI balance was $8.1$5.5 billion as of September 30, 2009,2010, compared to $8.0$7.6 billion as of December 31, 2008. This2009. The AOCI balance for HTM securities is amortized over the remaining life of the related securities as an adjustment of yield in a manner consistent with the accretion of discount on the same transferred debt securities. This will have no impact on the Company's net income because the amortization of the unrealized holding loss reported in equity will offset the effect on interest income of the accretion of the discount on these securities.

                  The credit-related impairment on HTM securities is recognized in earnings.


          Table of Contents

                  The table below shows the fair value of investments in HTM that have been in an unrealizedunrecognized loss position for less than 12 months or for 12 months or longer as of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:


           Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total  Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total 
          In millions of dollars Fair
          value
           Gross
          unrealized
          losses
           Fair
          value
           Gross
          unrealized
          losses
           Fair
          value
           Gross
          unrealized
          losses
            Fair
          value
           Gross
          unrecognized
          losses
           Fair
          value
           Gross
          unrecognized
          losses
           Fair
          value
           Gross
          unrecognized
          losses
           

          September 30, 2009

           

          Debt securities held-to-maturity

           

          September 30, 2010

           

          Debt securities HTM

           

          Mortgage-backed securities

           $5,235 $1,046 $13,656 $157 $18,891 $1,203  $211 $26 $14,543 $377 $14,754 $403 

          State and municipal

           733 138   733 138  605 3 950 52 1,555 55 

          Corporate

           2,801 138   2,801 138  1,019 44 1,404 57 2,423 101 

          Asset-backed securities

           5,713 701 807 21 6,520 722  268 10 578 50 846 60 

          Other debt securities

                        
                                    

          Total debt securities held-to-maturity

           $14,482 $2,023 $14,463 $178 $28,945 $2,201 

          Total debt securities HTM

           $2,103 $83 $17,475 $536 $19,578 $619 
                                    

          December 31, 2008

           

          Debt securities held-to-maturity

           

          December 31, 2009

           

          Debt securities HTM

           

          Mortgage-backed securities

           $2,348 $631 $24,236 $2,484 $26,584 $3,115  $ $ $16,923 $690 $16,923 $690 

          State and municipal

           2,499 253   2,499 253  755 79 713 34 1,468 113 

          Corporate

           23  4,107 305 4,130 305    1,519 182 1,519 182 

          Asset-backed securities

           9,051 381 4,164 174 13,215 555  348 18 5,460 478 5,808 496 

          Other debt securities

           439  5,246 127 5,685 127        
                                    

          Total debt securities held-to-maturity

           $14,360 $1,265 $37,753 $3,090 $52,113 $4,355 

          Total debt securities HTM

           $1,103 $97 $24,615 $1,384 $25,718 $1,481 
                                    

                  Excluded from the gross unrealizedunrecognized losses presented in the above table isare the $8.1$5.5 billion and $8.0$7.6 billion of gross unrealized losses recorded in AOCI mainly related to the HTM securities that were reclassified from AFS investments as of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively. Approximately $6.6 billion and $5.2 billionVirtually all of these unrealized losses relate to securities that have been in a loss position for 12 months or longer at both September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008, respectively.


          Table of Contents2009.

                  The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of HTM debt securities by contractual maturity dates as of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:


           September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008  September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
          In millions of dollars Carrying
          value
           Fair
          value
           Carrying
          value
           Fair
          value
            Carrying value Fair value Carrying value Fair value 

          Mortgage-backed securities

            

          Due within 1 year

           $1 $1 $88 $65  $ $ $1 $1 

          After 1 but within 5 years

           479 314 363 282  272 238 466 385 

          After 5 but within 10 years

           1,922 1,787 513 413  499 439 697 605 

          After 10 years(1)

           24,169 24,147 29,155 26,287  18,407 19,704 24,337 25,589 
                            

          Total

           $26,571 $26,249 $30,119 $27,047  $19,178 $20,381 $25,501 $26,580 
                            

          State and municipal

            

          Due within 1 year

           $6 $6 $86 $86  $6 $6 $6 $6 

          After 1 but within 5 years

           48 81 105 105  65 66 53 79 

          After 5 but within 10 years

           168 140 112 106  88 89 99 99 

          After 10 years(2)

           2,801 2,858 2,885 2,652 

          After 10 years(1)

           2,324 2,367 2,762 2,715 
                            

          Total

           $3,023 $3,085 $3,188 $2,949  $2,483 $2,528 $2,920 $2,899 
                            

          All other(2)

            

          Due within 1 year

           $5,618 $5,888 $4,482 $4,505  $541 $677 $4,652 $4,875 

          After 1 but within 5 years

           5,636 5,587 10,892 10,692  1,064 1,163 3,795 3,858 

          After 5 but within 10 years

           6,852 7,087 6,358 6,241  5,149 5,280 6,240 6,526 

          After 10 years(1)

           8,116 7,707 9,420 8,943  1,692 1,721 8,419 8,260 
                            

          Total

           $26,222 $26,269 $31,152 $30,381  $8,446 $8,841 $23,106 $23,519 
                            

          Total debt securities held-to-maturity

           $55,816 $55,603 $64,459 $60,377 

          Total debt securities HTM

           $30,107 $31,750 $51,527 $52,998 
                            

          (1)
          Investments with no stated maturities are included as contractual maturities of greater than 10 years. Actual maturities may differ due to call or prepayment rights.

          (2)
          Includes asset-backed securities and all other debt securities.

          Table of Contents

          Evaluating Investments for Other-than-TemporaryOther-Than-Temporary Impairments

                  The Company conducts and documents periodic reviews of all securities with unrealized losses to evaluate whether the impairment is other than temporary. Prior to January 1, 2009, these reviews were conducted pursuant to FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-1,, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments (ASC 320-10-35)(now incorporated into ASC 320-10-35,Investments—Debt and Equity Securities—Subsequent Measurement). Any unrealized loss identified as other than temporaryother-than-temporary was recorded directly in the Consolidated Statement of Income. As of January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 (ASC 320-10-65-1)(now incorporated into ASC 320-10-35-34,Investments—Debt and Equity Securities: Recognition of an Other-Than-Temporary Impairment). Accordingly, any credit-relatedThis guidance amends the impairment related tomodel for debt securities; the impairment model for equity securities was not affected.

                  Under the guidance for debt securities, other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) is recognized in earnings for debt securities which the Company has an intent to sell or which the Company believes it is more-likely-than-not that it will be required to sell prior to recovery of the amortized cost basis. For those securities which the Company does not planintend to sell and is not likelyor expect to be required to sell, credit-related impairment is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income,earnings, with the non-credit-related impairment recognizedrecorded in OCI. For other impaired debt securities, the entire impairment is recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income.AOCI.

                  An unrealized loss exists when the current fair value of an individual security is less than its amortized cost basis. Unrealized losses that are determined to be temporary in nature are recorded, net of tax, in AOCI for AFS securities, while such losses related to HTM securities are not recorded, as these investments are carried at their amortized cost. For securities transferred to HTM fromTrading account assets, amortized cost is defined as the fair value of the securities at the date of transfer, plus any accretion income and less any impairment recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer. For securities transferred to HTM from AFS, amortized cost is defined as the original purchase cost, plus or minus any accretion or amortization of a purchase discount or premium, less any impairment recognized in earnings subsequent to transfer.

                  Regardless of the classification of the securities as AFS or HTM, the Company has assessed each position for credit impairment.

                  Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include:

            the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been below cost;

            the severity of the impairment;

            the cause of the impairment and the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer;

            activity in the market of the issuer which may indicate adverse credit conditions; and

            the Company's ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery.

                  The Company's review for impairment generally entails:

            identification and evaluation of investments that have indications of possible impairment;

            analysis of individual investments that have fair values less than amortized cost, including consideration of the length of time the investment has been in an unrealized loss position and the expected recovery period;

            discussion of evidential matter, including an evaluation of factors or triggers that could cause individual investments to qualify as having other-than-temporary impairment and those that would not support other-than-temporary impairment; and

            documentation of the results of these analyses, as required under business policies.

                  For equity securities, management considers the various factors described above, including its intent and ability to hold the equity security for a period of time sufficient for recovery to amortized cost. Where management lacks that intent or ability, the security's decline in fair value is deemed to be other than temporary and is recorded in earnings. AFS equity securities deemed other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to fair value, with the full difference between fair value and cost recognized in earnings.

                  For debt securities that are not deemed to be credit impaired, management performs additional analysis to assessassesses whether it intends to sell or whether it is more-likely-than-not that it would not be required to sell the investment before the expected recovery of the amortized cost basis. In most cases, management has asserted that it has no intent to sell and that it believes it is more-likely-than-not that it will not likely to be required to sell the investment before recovery of its amortized cost basis. Where such an assertion has not been made, the security's decline in fair value is deemed to be other than temporaryother-than-temporary and is recorded in earnings.

                  For debt securities, a critical component of the evaluation for other-than-temporary impairmentsOTTI is the identification of credit impaired securities, where management does not expect to receive cash flows sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. For securities purchased and classified as AFS with the expectation of receiving full principal and interest cash flows as of the date of purchase, this analysis considers the likelihood of receiving all contractual principal and interest. For securities reclassified out of the trading category in the fourth quarter of 2008, the analysis considers the likelihood of receiving the expected principal and interest cash flows anticipated as of the date of reclassification in the fourth quarter of 2008. The extent of the Company's analysis regarding credit quality and the stress on assumptions used in the analysis have been refined for securities where the current fair value or other characteristics of the security warrant. The paragraphs below describe the Company's process for identifying credit impairment in security types with the most significant unrealized losses as of September 30, 2009.2010.


                  AFS equity securities deemed other-than-temporarily impaired are written down to fair value, with the full difference between fair value and amortized cost recognized in earnings.Table of Contents

          Mortgage-Backed SecuritiesMortgage-backed securities

                  For U.S. mortgage-backed securities (and in particular for Alt-A and other mortgage-backed securities that have significant unrealized losses as a percentage of amortized cost), credit impairment is assessed using a cash flow model that estimates the cash flows on the underlying mortgages, using the security-specific collateral and transaction structure. The model estimates cash flows from the underlying mortgage loans and distributes those cash flows to various tranches of securities, considering the transaction structure and any subordination and credit enhancements that exist in that structure. The cash flow model incorporates actual cash flows on the mortgage-backed securities through the current period and then projects the remaining cash flows using a number of assumptions, including default rates, prepayment rates, and recovery rates (on foreclosed properties).


          Table of Contents

                  Management develops specific assumptions using as much market data as possible and includes internal estimates as well as estimates published by rating agencies and other third-party sources. Default rates are projected by considering current underlying mortgage loan performance, generally assuming the default of (1) 10% of current loans, (2) 25% of 30-59 day delinquent loans, (3) 75%70% of 60-90 day delinquent loans and (4) 100% of 91+ day delinquent loans. These estimates are extrapolated along a default timing curve to estimate the total lifetime pool default rate. Other assumptions used contemplate the actual collateral attributes, including geographic concentrations, rating agency loss projections, rating actions and current market prices.

                  The key base assumptions for mortgage-backed securities as of September 30, 20092010 are in the table below:

           
           September 30, 20092010 

          Prepayment raterate(1)

            3-8 CRR 

          Loss severity(1)severity(2)

            45%-75–85%%

          Unemployment rate

            10%

          Peak-to-trough housing price decline9.8%

           32.3%
              

          (1)
          Conditional Repayment Rate (CRR) represents the annualized expected rate of voluntary prepayment of principal for mortgage-backed securities over a certain period of time.

          (2)
          Loss severity rates are estimated considering collateral characteristics and generally range from 45%-60% for prime bonds, 50%-70%-85% for Alt-A bonds, and 65%-75%-85% for subprime bonds.

                  The valuation as of September 30, 2010 assumes that U.S. housing prices are unchanged for the remainder of 2010, increase 1.2% in 2011, increase 1.8% in 2012 and increase 3% per year from 2013 onwards.

                  In addition, cash flow projections are developed using more stressful parameters, and management assesses the results of those stress tests (including the severity of any cash shortfall indicated and the likelihood of the stress scenario'sscenarios actually occurring based on the underlying pool's characteristics and performance) to assess whether management expects to recover the amortized cost basis of the security. If cash flow projections indicate that the Company does not expect to recover its amortized cost basis, the Company recognizes the estimated credit loss in earnings.

          State and Municipal Securitiesmunicipal securities

                  Citigroup's AFS state and municipal bonds consist primarilymainly of bonds that are financed through Tender Option Bond programs. The process for identifying credit impairment for bonds in this program as well as for bonds that were previously financed in this program is largely based on third-party credit ratings. Individual bond positions must meet minimum ratings requirements, which vary based on the sector of the bond issuer. The average portfolio rating, ignoring any insurance, is Aa3/AA-.

                  Citigroup monitors the bond issuer and insurer ratings on a daily basis. The average portfolio rating, ignoring any insurance, is Aa3/AA-. In the event of a downgrade of the bond below the Aa3/AA-, the subject bond is specifically reviewed for potential shortfall in contractual principal and interest. Citigroup has not recorded any credit impairments on bonds held as part of the Tender Option Bond program or on bonds that were previously held as part of the Tender Option Bond program.

                  The remainder of Citigroup's AFS state and municipal bonds, outside of the Tender Option Bond Programs,above, are specifically reviewed for credit impairment based on instrument-specific estimates of cash flows, probability of default and loss given default.


          Table of Contents

          Recognition and Measurement of Other-Than-Temporary ImpairmentOTTI

                  The following table presents the total other-than-temporary impairmentsOTTI recognized in earnings during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009:

          Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (OTTI) on Investments2010:


           Three months ended Sept. 30, 2009 Nine months ended Sept. 30, 2009 
          OTTI on Investments Three months ended Sept 30, 2010 Nine months ended Sept 30, 2010 
          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars AFS HTM Total AFS HTM Total  AFS HTM Total AFS HTM Total 

          Impairment losses related to securities which the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell:

          Impairment losses related to securities which the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell:

            

          Total OTTI losses recognized during the quarter ended September 30, 2009

           $158 $2,182 $2,340 $263 $5,730 $5,993 

          Less: portion of OTTI loss recognized in OCI (before taxes)

           25 1,716 1,741 54 3,952 4,006 

          Total OTTI losses recognized during the periods ended September 30, 2010

           $22 $142 $164 $258 $691 $949 

          Less: portion of OTTI loss recognized in AOCI (before taxes)

           2 8 10 8 48 56 
                                    

          Net impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell

          Net impairment losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company does not intend to sell nor will likely be required to sell

           $133 $466 $599 $209 $1,778 $1,987  $20 $134 $154 $250 $643 $893 

          OTTI losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company intends to sell or more-likely-than-not will be required to sell before recovery

          OTTI losses recognized in earnings for securities that the Company intends to sell or more-likely-than-not will be required to sell before recovery

           113  113 168  168  66  66 288  288 
                                    

          Total impairment losses recognized in earnings

          Total impairment losses recognized in earnings

           $246 $466 $712 $377 $1,778 $2,155  $86 $134 $220 $538 $643 $1,181 
                                    

          Table of Contents

                  The following is a three-month roll forward3-month roll-forward of the credit-related position recognized in earnings for AFS and HTM debt securities held as of September 30, 2009:2010:



           Cumulative Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings 
           Cumulative OTTI Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings 
          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars June 30, 2009
          Balance
           Credit impairments
          recognized in
          earnings on
          securities not
          previously impaired
           Credit impairments
          recognized in
          earnings on
          securities than
          have been
          previously impaired
           Reductions due
          to sales of credit
          impaired
          securities sold
          or matured
           Sept. 30, 2009
          Balance
           In millions of dollars June 30, 2010
          balance
           Credit impairments
          recognized in
          earnings on
          securities not
          previously impaired
           Credit impairments
          recognized in
          earnings on
          securities that have
          been previously
          impaired
           Reductions due to
          sales of credit
          impaired
          securities sold or
          matured
           September 30, 2010
          balance
           

          AFS debt securities

          AFS debt securities

           

          AFS debt securities

           

          Mortgage-backed securities

          Mortgage-backed securities

           

          Mortgage-backed securities

           

          Prime

           $7 $92 $ $ $99 

          Prime

           $280 $ $12 $ $292 

          Commercial real estate

           2    2 

          Alt-A

           2    2 
                     

          Commercial real estate

           2    2 

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           9 92   101             

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           $284 $ $12 $ $296 

          State and municipal

          State and municipal

           3    3 

          U.S. Treasury

          U.S. Treasury

           36 2   38 

          Foreign government

          Foreign government

           14   (1) 13 

          Foreign government

           159    159 

          Corporate

          Corporate

           97 24 10  131 

          Corporate

           147 6   153 

          Asset backed securities

           3  5  8 

          Asset-backed securities

          Asset-backed securities

           9    9 

          Other debt securities

          Other debt securities

           6 2   8 

          Other debt securities

           52    52 
                                 

          Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities

          Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities

           $129 $118 $15 $(1)$261 

          Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities

           $690 $8 $12 $ $710 
                                 

          HTM debt securities

          HTM debt securities

           

          HTM debt securities

           

          Mortgage-backed securities

          Mortgage-backed securities

           

          Mortgage-backed securities

           

          Prime

           $14 $93 $1 $ $108 

          Prime

           $297 $1 $1 $ $299 

          Alt-A

           1,901 297   2,198 

          Alt-A

           2,886 49 64  2,999 

          Subprime

           105 66   171 

          Subprime

           213  19  232 

          Non-U.S. residential

           96    96 

          Non-U.S. residential

           96    96 

          Commercial real estate

           4    4 

          Commercial real estate

           10    10 
                                 

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           2,120 456 1  2,577 

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           $3,502 $50 $84 $ $3,636 

          State and municipal

          State and municipal

           7    7 

          Corporate

          Corporate

           320 8  (3) 325 

          Corporate

           351    351 

          Asset backed securities

           32    32 

          Asset-backed securities

          Asset-backed securities

           108    108 

          Other debt securities

          Other debt securities

           3  1  4 

          Other debt securities

           5    5 
                                 

          Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities

          Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities

           $2,475 $464 $2 $(3)$2,938 

          Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities

           $3,973 $50 $84 $ $4,107 
                                 

          Table of Contents

                  The following is a nine-month roll forward9-month roll-forward of the credit-related position recognized in earnings for AFS and HTM debt securities held as of September 30, 2009:2010:



           Cumulative Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings 
           Cumulative OTTI Credit Losses Recognized in Earnings 
          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars January 1, 2009
          Balance
           Credit impairments
          recognized in
          earnings on
          securities not
          previously impaired
           Credit impairments
          recognized in
          earnings on
          securities than
          have been
          previously
          impaired
           Reductions due
          to sales of credit
          impaired
          securities sold
          or matured
           Sept. 30, 2009
          Balance
           In millions of dollars December 31, 2009
          balance
           Credit impairments
          recognized in
          earnings on
          securities not
          previously impaired
           Credit impairments
          recognized in
          earnings on
          securities that have
          been previously
          impaired
           Reductions due to
          sales of credit
          impaired
          securities sold or
          matured
           September 30, 2010
          balance
           
          AFS debt securitiesAFS debt securities 

          AFS debt securities

           
          Mortgage-backed securitiesMortgage-backed securities 

          Mortgage-backed securities

           
          Prime $ $99 $ $ $99 

          Prime

           $242 $12 $38 $ $292 
          Commercial real estate 1 1   2 

          Alt-A

           1 1   2 
                     

          Commercial real estate

           2    2 
          Total mortgage-backed securities 1 100   101             

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           $245 $13 $38 $ $296 

          State and municipal

          State and municipal

            3   3 

          U.S. Treasury

          U.S. Treasury

            38   38 
          Foreign governmentForeign government  14  (1) 13 

          Foreign government

           20 139   159 
          CorporateCorporate 53 54 25 (1) 131 

          Corporate

           137 11 5  153 
          Asset backed securities  3 5  8 

          Asset-backed securities

          Asset-backed securities

           9    9 
          Other debt securitiesOther debt securities  8   6 

          Other debt securities

           49 3   52 
                                 
          Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt
          securities
          Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt
          securities
           $54 $179 $30 $(2)$261 

          Total OTTI credit losses recognized for AFS debt securities

           $460 $207 $43 $ $710 
                                 
          HTM debt securitiesHTM debt securities 

          HTM debt securities

           
          Mortgage-backed securitiesMortgage-backed securities 

          Mortgage-backed securities

           
          Prime $8 $99 $1 $ $108 

          Prime

           $170 $127 $2 $ $299 
          Alt-A 1,091 1,088 19  2,198 

          Alt-A

           2,569 358 72  2,999 
          Subprime 85 86   171 

          Subprime

           210 1 21  232 
          Non- U.S. residential 28 68   96 

          Non-U.S. residential

           96    96 
          Commercial real estate 4    4 

          Commercial real estate

           9 1   10 
                                 
          Total mortgage-backed securities 1,216 1,341 20  2,577 

          Total mortgage-backed securities

           $3,054 $487 $95 $ $3,636 

          State and municipal

          State and municipal

           7    7 
          CorporateCorporate  398  (73) 325 

          Corporate

           351    351 
          Asset backed securities 17 15   32 

          Asset-backed securities

          Asset-backed securities

           48 41 19  108 
          Other debt securitiesOther debt securities  3 1  4 

          Other debt securities

           4  1  5 
                                 
          Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt
          securities
          Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt
          securities
           $1,233 $1,757 $21 $(73)$2,938 

          Total OTTI credit losses recognized for HTM debt securities

           $3,464 $528 $115 $ $4,107 
                                 

          Table of Contents

          Investments in Alternative Investment Funds that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share

                  The Company holds investments in certain alternative investment funds that calculate net asset value (NAV) per share, including hedge funds, private equity funds, fund of funds and real estate funds. The Company's investments include co-investments in funds that are managed by the Company and investments in funds that are managed by third parties. Investments in funds are generally classified as non-marketable equity securities carried at fair value.

                  The fair values of these investments are estimated using the NAV per share of the Company's ownership interest in the funds, where it is not probable that the Company will sell an investment at a price other than NAV.

          In millions of dollars at September 30, 2010 Fair
          value
           Unfunded commitments Redemption frequency
          (if currently eligible)
           Redemption notice
          period
           

          Hedge funds

           $972 $14  Monthly, quarterly, annually  10-95 days 

          Private equity funds(1)(2)

            3,205  1,652     

          Real estate funds(3)

            388  171     
                    

          Total

           $4,565(4)$1,837       
                    

          (1)
          Includes investments in private equity funds carried at cost with a carrying value of $266 million.

          (2)
          Private equity funds include funds that invest in infrastructure, leveraged buyout transactions, emerging markets and venture capital.

          (3)
          This category includes several real estate funds that invest primarily in commercial real estate in the U.S., Europe and Asia. These investments can never be redeemed with the funds. Distributions from each fund will be received as the underlying investments in the funds are liquidated. It is estimated that the underlying assets of the fund will be liquidated over a period of several years as market conditions allow. While certain assets within the portfolio may be sold, no specific assets have been identified for sale. Because it is not probable that any individual investment will be sold, the fair value of each individual investment has been estimated using the NAV of the Company's ownership interest in the partners' capital. There is no standard redemption frequency nor is a prior notice period required. The investee fund's management must approve of the buyer before the sale of the investments can be completed.

          (4)
          Included in the total fair value of investments above is $2.0 billion of fund assets that are valued using NAVs provided by third-party asset managers.

          Table of Contents

          11.    GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

          Goodwill

                  The changes in goodwillGoodwill during the first nine months ended September 30, 2009of 2010 were as follows:

          In millions of dollars Goodwill 

          Balance at December 31, 2008

           $27,132 

          Foreign exchange translation

            (844)

          Purchase accounting adjustments and other

            122 
              

          Balance at March 31, 2009

           $26,410 

          Morgan Stanley Smith Barney joint venture

            (1,146)

          Estimated impact from the Sale of Nikko Cordial Securities, reclassified asAssets of discontinued operations held for sale

            (533)

          Foreign exchange translation

            847 
              

          Balance at June 30, 2009

           $25,578 

          Estimated impact from the Sale of Nikko Asset Management, reclassified asOther Assets of businesses held for sale

            (446)

          Foreign exchange translation

            409 

          Purchase accounting adjustments and other

            (118)
              

          Balance at September 30, 2009

           $25,423 
              
          In millions of dollars 

          Balance at December 31, 2009

           $25,392 
              

          Foreign exchange translation

            294 

          Smaller acquisitions/divestitures, purchase accounting adjustments and other

            (24)
              

          Balance at March 31, 2010

           $25,662 
              

          Foreign exchange translation

            (442)

          Smaller acquisitions/divestitures, purchase accounting adjustments and other

            (19)
              

          Balance at June 30, 2010

           $25,201 
              

          Foreign exchange translation

            651 

          Smaller acquisitions/divestitures, purchase accounting adjustments and other

            (55)
              

          Balance at September 30, 2010

           $25,797 
              

                  During the first nine months of 2009,2010, no goodwill was written off due to impairment. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test during the third quarter of 20092010 and while no impairment was noted in step one for any of the reporting units, goodwill forpresent in the Latin America Regional Consumer Banking and Local Consumer Lending—Cards reporting unitsunit may be particularly sensitive to further deterioration in economic conditions. Additionally, the fair value of theAsia Regional Consumer Banking andTransaction Services reporting units substantially exceeded their respective carrying values.

                  Citigroup engaged the services of an independent valuation specialist to assist in the valuation of a number of its reporting units, includingLocal Consumer Lending—Cards. The fair value as a percentage of allocated book value for Latin America Regional Consumer Banking and theLocal Consumer Lending—Cards reporting unit is 111%121%. If economic conditions deteriorate or other events adversely impact the business models and 112%, respectively. If the future wererelated assumptions, including the discount rate, expected recovery, and expected loss rates used to differ adversely from management's best estimate of key economic assumptions and associated cash flows were to decrease by a small margin,value this reporting unit, the Company could potentially experience future material impairment charges with respect to the $1,317 million and $4,751$4,577 million of goodwill remaining in our Latin America Regional Consumer Banking and theLocal Consumer Lending—Cards reporting units, respectively.unit. Any such charges, by themselves, would not negatively affect the Company's Tier 1, Tier 1 Common and Total Capital regulatory ratios, its Tangible Common Equity or the Company'scompany's liquidity position. The Company will continue to monitor this reporting unit.

                  The following tables present the Company's goodwill balances by reporting unit and by segment at September 30, 2009:2010:

          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars September 30, 2009 In millions of dollars 

          By Reporting Unit

           
          Reporting unit(1) Goodwill 

          North America Regional Consumer Banking

          North America Regional Consumer Banking

           $2,461  $2,502 

          EMEA Regional Consumer Banking

          EMEA Regional Consumer Banking

           342  319 

          Asia Regional Consumer Banking

          Asia Regional Consumer Banking

           5,375  5,779 

          Latin America Regional Consumer Banking

          Latin America Regional Consumer Banking

           1,317  1,747 

          Securities and Banking

          Securities and Banking

           8,767  9,241 

          Transaction Services

          Transaction Services

           1,579  1,567 

          Brokerage and Asset Management

          Brokerage and Asset Management

           831  65 

          Local Consumer Lending—Cards

           4,751 

          Local Consumer Lending—Other

            

          Local Consumer Lending—Cards

           4,577 
                

          Total

           $25,423 

          Total

           $25,797 
                

          By Segment

          By Segment

            

          Regional Consumer Banking

          Regional Consumer Banking

           $9,495  $10,347 

          Institutional Clients Group

          Institutional Clients Group

           10,346  10,808 

          Citi Holdings

          Citi Holdings

           5,582  4,642 
                

          Total

           $25,797 

          Total

           $25,423    
             

          (1)
          Local Consumer Lending—Other is excluded from the table as there is no goodwill allocated to it.

          Table of Contents

          Intangible Assets

                  The components of intangible assets were as follows:


           September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008  September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
          In millions of dollars Gross
          carrying
          amount
           Accumulated
          amortization
           Net
          carrying
          amount
           Gross
          carrying
          amount
           Accumulated
          amortization
           Net
          carrying
          amount
            Gross
          carrying
          amount
           Accumulated
          amortization
           Net
          carrying
          amount
           Gross
          carrying
          amount
           Accumulated
          amortization
           Net
          carrying
          amount
           

          Purchased credit card relationships

           $8,138 $4,684 $3,454 $8,443 $4,513 $3,930  $7,784 $4,923 $2,861 $8,148 $4,838 $3,310 

          Core deposit intangibles

           1,351 744 607 1,345 662 683  1,424 920 504 1,373 791 582 

          Other customer relationships

           696 170 526 4,031 168 3,863  699 190 509 675 176 499 

          Present value of future profits

           416 275 141 415 264 151  240 111 129 418 280 138 

          Indefinite-lived intangible assets

           540  540 569  569 

          Other(1)

           4,965 1,292 3,673 5,343 1,285 4,058  4,749 1,587 3,162 4,977 1,361 3,616 
                                    

          Total amortizing intangible assets

           $15,566 $7,165 $8,401 $19,577 $6,892 $12,685 

          Indefinite-lived intangible assets

           556 N/A 556 1,474 N/A 1,474 

          Mortgage servicing rights

           6,228 N/A 6,228 5,657 N/A 5,657 

          Intangible assets (excluding MSRs)

           $15,436 $7,731 $7,705 $16,160 $7,446 $8,714 

          MSRs

           3,976  3,976 6,530  6,530 
                                    

          Total intangible assets

           $22,350 $7,165 $15,185 $26,708 $6,892 $19,816  $19,412 $7,731 $11,681 $22,690 $7,446 $15,244 
                                    

          (1)
          Includes contract-related intangible assets.

          N/A    Not Applicable.

                  The changes in intangible assets during the first nine months ended September 30, 2009of 2010 were as follows:

          In millions of dollars Net carrying
          amount at
          December 31,
          2008
           Acquisitions /
          Divestitures
           Amortization Impairments FX and
          other(1)
           Net carrying
          amount at
          September 30,
          2009
            Net carrying
          amount at
          December 31,
          2009
           Acquisitions/
          divestitures
           Amortization Impairments FX
          and
          other(1)
           Net carrying
          amount at
          September 30,
          2010
           

          Purchased credit card relationships

           $3,930 $(72)$(444)$ $40 $3,454  $3,310 $(53)$(368)$(39)$11 $2,861 

          Core deposit intangibles

           683  (86) (3) 13 607  582  (81)  3 504 

          Other customer relationships(2)

           3,863 (3,253) (145)  61 526  499  (42)  52 509 

          Present value of future profits

           151  (10)   141  138  (10)  1 129 

          Indefinite-lived intangible assets(2)

           1,474 (967)   49 556  569 (46)   17 540 

          Other

           4,058 (133) (222) (53) 23 3,673  3,616  (236) (32) (186) 3,162 
                                    

           $14,159 $(4,425)$(907)$(56)$186 $8,957 
                       

          Mortgage servicing rights(3)

           5,657         6,228 

          Intangible assets (excluding MSRs)

           $8,714 $(99)$(737)$(71)$(102)$7,705 

          MSRs(2)

           6,530         3,976 
                        

          Total intangible assets

           $19,816         $15,185  $15,244         $11,681 
                        

          (1)
          Includes the impact of FXforeign exchange translation and purchase accounting adjustments.

          (2)
          Decrease during the third quarter of 2009 is due to the reclassification of assets of the Nikko asset management business toOther Assets as described in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

          (3)
          See Note 1514 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the roll-forward of mortgage servicing rights.MSRs.

          Table of Contents


          12.    DEBT

          Short-Term Borrowings

                  Short-term borrowings consist of commercial paper and other borrowings as follows:

          In millions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
            September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           

          Commercial paper

            

          Citigroup Funding Inc.

           $9,983 $28,654 

          Other Citigroup subsidiaries

           433 471 

          Bank

           $26,604 $ 

          Other non-bank

           9,564 10,223 
                    

           $10,416 $29,125  $36,168 $10,223 

          Other short-term borrowings(1)

           54,315 97,566  50,845 58,656 
                    

          Total short-term borrowings(2)

           $64,731 $126,691  $87,013 $68,879 
                    

          (1)
          At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank were $11.9 billion and $23.0 billion, respectively.

          (2)
          September 30, 2010 includes $32.2 billion of short-term borrowings related to VIEs consolidated effective January 1, 2010 with the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

                  Borrowings under bank lines of credit may be at interest rates based on LIBOR, CD rates, the prime rate or bids submitted by the banks. Citigroup pays commitment fees for its lines of credit.

                  Some of Citigroup's non-bank subsidiaries have credit facilities with Citigroup's subsidiary depository institutions, including Citibank, N.A. Borrowings under these facilities must be secured in accordance with Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act.

                  Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI) has committed financing with unaffiliated banks. At September 30, 2009, CGMHI had drawn down the full $1.175 billion available under these facilities, of which $725 million is guaranteed by Citigroup. CGMHI has a bilateral facility totaling $400 million with an unaffiliated bank maturing prior to year end. It also has substantial borrowing agreements consisting of facilities that CGMHI has been advised are available, but where no contractual lending obligation exists. These arrangements are reviewed on an ongoing basis to ensure flexibility in meeting CGMHI's short-term requirements.

          Long-Term Debt

          In millions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
           

          Citigroup parent company

           $214,981 $192,290 

          Other Citigroup subsidiaries(1)

            97,965  109,306 

          Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI)

            15,403  20,623 

          Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI)(2)

            51,208  37,374 
                

          Total long term debt

           $379,557 $359,593 
                
          In millions of dollars September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           

          Citigroup parent company

           $197,948 $197,804 

          Bank(1)

            116,062  78,857 

          Other non-bank

            73,320  87,358 
                

          Total long-term debt(2)(3)(4)

           $387,330 $364,019 
                

          (1)
          At September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, collateralized advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank are $30.6were $18.5 billion and $67.4$24.1 billion, respectively.

          (2)
          September 30, 2010, includes $69.6 billion of long-term debt related to VIEs consolidated effective January 1, 2010 with the adoption of SFAS 166/167.

          (3)
          Of this amount, approximately $59.6 billion is guaranteed by the FDIC under the TLGP with $1.3 billion maturing in 2010, $20.3 billion maturing in 2011 and $38 billion maturing in 2012.

          (4)
          Includes Principal-Protected Trust Securities (Safety First Trust Securities) with carrying values of $521$469 million issued by Safety First Trust Series 2006-1, 2007-1, 2007-2, 2007-3, 2007-4, 2008-1, 2008-2, 2008-3, 2008-4, 2008-5, 2008-6, 2009-1, 2009-2, and 2009-3 (collectively, the "Safety First Trusts") at September 30, 20092010 and $452$528 million issued by Safety First Trust Series 2006-1, 2007-1, 2007-2, 2007-3, 2007-4, 2008-1, 2008-2, 2008-3, 2008-4, 2008-5, 2008-6, 2009-1, 2009-2, and 2008-62009-3 at December 31, 2008.2009. CFI owns all of the voting securities of the Safety First Trusts. The Safety First Trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration and repayment of the Safety First Trust Securities and the Safety First Trusts' common securities. The Safety First Trusts' obligations under the Safety First Trust Securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by CFI, and CFI's guarantee obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.

                  CGMHI has a syndicated five-year committed uncollateralized revolving line of credit facility with unaffiliated banks totaling $3.0 billion, which was undrawn at September 30, 2009 and matures in 2011. CGMHI also has committed long-term financing facilities with unaffiliated banks. At September 30, 2009,2010, CGMHI had drawn down the full $900 million available under these facilities, of which $150 million is guaranteed by Citigroup. Generally, a bank can terminate these facilities by giving CGMHI one-year prior notice.

                  The Company issues both fixed and variable rate debt in a range of currencies. It uses derivative contracts, primarily interest rate swaps, to effectively convert a portion of its fixed rate debt to variable rate debt and variable rate debt to fixed rate debt. The maturity structure of the derivatives generally corresponds to the maturity structure of the debt being hedged. In addition, the Company uses other derivative contracts to manage the impact of FX translation on certain debt issuances.

                  Citigroup and other U.S. financial services firms are currently benefiting from government programs that are improving markets and providing Citigroup and other institutions with significant current funding capacity and significant liquidity support, including the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP). See "TARP and Other Regulatory Programs" above.

                  Long-term debt at September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 20082009 includes $34.5$20.4 billion and $24.1$19.3 billion, respectively, of junior subordinated debt. The Company formed statutory business trusts under the laws of the state of Delaware. The trusts exist for the exclusive purposes of (1) issuing trust securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the trust; (2) investing the gross proceeds of the trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (subordinated debentures) of its parent; and (3) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto. Upon approval from the Federal Reserve Board, Citigroup has the right to redeem these securities.

                  Citigroup has contractually agreed not to redeem or purchase (i) the 6.50% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XV before September 15, 2056, (ii) the 6.45% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup


          Table of Contents

          Capital XVI before December 31, 2046, (iii) the 6.35% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVII before March 15, 2057, (iv) the 6.829% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XVIII before June 28, 2047, (v) the 7.250% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XIX before August 15, 2047, (vi) the 7.875% Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XX before December 15, 2067, and (vii) the 8.300% Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Enhanced Trust Preferred Securities of Citigroup Capital XXI before December 21, 2067, unless certain conditions, described in Exhibit 4.03 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2006, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 28, 2006, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 8, 2007, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2007, in Exhibit 4.02 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 17, 2007, in Exhibit 4.2 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2007, and in Exhibit 4.2 to Citigroup's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 21, 2007, respectively, are met. These agreements are for the benefit of the holders of Citigroup's 6.00% Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2034. In addition, see Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Exchange Offers," below.

                  Citigroup owns all of the voting securities of these subsidiary trusts. These subsidiary trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration and repayment of the subsidiary trusts and the subsidiary trusts' common securities. These subsidiary trusts' obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Citigroup.


          Table of Contents

                  The following table summarizes the financial structure of each of the Company's subsidiary trusts at September 30, 2009:2010:


            
            
            
            
            
           Junior subordinated debentures
          owned by trust
             
            
            
            
            
           Junior subordinated debentures
          owned by trust
           
          Trust securities with distributions
          guaranteed by Citigroup
          In millions of dollars, except share amounts
           Issuance
          date
           Securities
          issued
           Liquidation
          value
           Coupon
          rate
           Common
          shares issued
          to parent
           Amount(1) Maturity Redeemable
          by issuer
          beginning
            Issuance
          date
           Securities
          issued
           Liquidation
          value
           Coupon
          rate
           Common
          shares issued
          to parent
           Amount(1) Maturity Redeemable
          by issuer
          beginning
           
          Citigroup Capital III Dec. 1996 194,053 $194 7.625% 6,003 $200 Dec. 1, 2036 Not redeemable  Dec. 1996 194,053 $194 7.625% 6,003 $200 Dec. 1, 2036 Not redeemable 
          Citigroup Capital VII July 2001 35,885,898 897 7.125% 1,109,874 925 July 31, 2031 July 31, 2006  July 2001 35,885,898 897 7.125% 1,109,874 925 July 31, 2031 July 31, 2006 
          Citigroup Capital VIII Sept. 2001 43,651,597 1,091 6.950% 1,350,050 1,125 Sept. 15, 2031 Sept. 17, 2006  Sept. 2001 43,651,597 1,091 6.950% 1,350,050 1,125 Sept. 15, 2031 Sept. 17, 2006 
          Citigroup Capital IX Feb. 2003 33,874,813 847 6.000% 1,047,675 873 Feb. 14, 2033 Feb. 13, 2008  Feb. 2003 33,874,813 847 6.000% 1,047,675 873 Feb. 14, 2033 Feb. 13, 2008 
          Citigroup Capital X Sept. 2003 14,757,823 369 6.100% 456,428 380 Sept. 30, 2033 Sept. 30, 2008  Sept. 2003 14,757,823 369 6.100% 456,428 380 Sept. 30, 2033 Sept. 30, 2008 
          Citigroup Capital XI Sept. 2004 18,387,128 460 6.000% 568,675 474 Sept. 27, 2034 Sept. 27, 2009  Sept. 2004 18,387,128 460 6.000% 568,675 474 Sept. 27, 2034 Sept. 27, 2009 

          Citigroup Capital XII

           Mar. 2010 92,000,000 2,300 8.500% 25 2,300 Mar. 30, 2040 Mar. 30, 2015 

          Citigroup Capital XIII

           Sept. 2010 89,840,000 2,246 7.875% 25 2,246 Oct. 30, 2040 Oct. 30, 2015 
          Citigroup Capital XIV June 2006 12,227,281 306 6.875% 40,000 307 June 30, 2066 June 30, 2011  June 2006 12,227,281 306 6.875% 40,000 307 June 30, 2066 June 30, 2011 
          Citigroup Capital XV Sept. 2006 25,210,733 630 6.500% 40,000 631 Sept. 15, 2066 Sept. 15, 2011  Sept. 2006 25,210,733 630 6.500% 40,000 631 Sept. 15, 2066 Sept. 15, 2011 
          Citigroup Capital XVI Nov. 2006 38,148,947 954 6.450% 20,000 954 Dec. 31, 2066 Dec. 31, 2011  Nov. 2006 38,148,947 954 6.450% 20,000 954 Dec. 31, 2066 Dec. 31, 2011 
          Citigroup Capital XVII Mar. 2007 28,047,927 701 6.350% 20,000 702 Mar. 15, 2067 Mar. 15, 2012  Mar. 2007 28,047,927 701 6.350% 20,000 702 Mar. 15, 2067 Mar. 15, 2012 
          Citigroup Capital XVIII June 2007 99,901 160 6.829% 50 160 June 28, 2067 June 28, 2017  June 2007 99,901 157 6.829% 50 158 June 28, 2067 June 28, 2017 
          Citigroup Capital XIX Aug. 2007 22,771,968 569 7.250% 20,000 570 Aug. 15, 2067 Aug. 15, 2012  Aug. 2007 22,771,968 569 7.250% 20,000 570 Aug. 15, 2067 Aug. 15, 2012 
          Citigroup Capital XX Nov. 2007 17,709,814 443 7.875% 20,000 443 Dec. 15, 2067 Dec. 15, 2012  Nov. 2007 17,709,814 443 7.875% 20,000 443 Dec. 15, 2067 Dec. 15, 2012 
          Citigroup Capital XXI Dec. 2007 2,345,801 2,346 8.300% 500 2,346 Dec. 21, 2077 Dec. 21, 2037  Dec. 2007 2,345,801 2,346 8.300% 500 2,346 Dec. 21, 2077 Dec. 21, 2037 
          Citigroup Capital XXIX Nov. 2007 1,875,000 1,875 6.320% 10 1,875 Mar. 15, 2041 Mar. 15, 2013 
          Citigroup Capital XXX Nov. 2007 1,875,000 1,875 6.455% 10 1,875 Sept. 15, 2041 Sept. 15, 2013 
          Citigroup Capital XXXI Nov. 2007 1,875,000 1,875 6.700% 10 1,875 Mar. 15, 2042 Mar. 15, 2014  Nov. 2007 1,875,000 1,875 6.700% 10 1,875 Mar. 15, 2042 Mar. 15, 2014 
          Citigroup Capital XXXII Nov. 2007 1,875,000 1,875 6.935% 10 1,875 Sept. 15, 2042 Sept. 15, 2014  Nov. 2007 1,875,000 1,875 6.935% 10 1,875 Sept. 15, 2042 Sept. 15, 2014 
          Citigroup Capital XXXIII July 2009 27,059,000 27,059 8.000% 100 27,059 July 30, 2039 July 30, 2014  July 2009 3,025,000 3,025 8.000% 100 3,025 July 30, 2039 July 30, 2014 
          Adam Capital Trust III Dec. 2002 17,500 18 3 mo. LIB
          +335 bp.
           542 18 Jan. 7, 2033 Jan. 7, 2008  Dec. 2002 17,500 18 3 mo. LIB
          +335 bp.
           542 18 Jan. 7, 2033 Jan. 7, 2008 
          Adam Statutory Trust III Dec. 2002 25,000 25 3 mo. LIB
          +325 bp.
           774 26 Dec. 26, 2032 Dec. 26, 2007  Dec. 2002 25,000 25 3 mo. LIB
          +325 bp.
           774 26 Dec. 26, 2032 Dec. 26, 2007 
          Adam Statutory Trust IV Sept. 2003 40,000 40 3 mo. LIB
          +295 bp.
           1,238 41 Sept. 17, 2033 Sept. 17, 2008  Sept. 2003 40,000 40 3 mo. LIB
          +295 bp.
           1,238 41 Sept. 17, 2033 Sept. 17, 2008 
          Adam Statutory Trust V Mar. 2004 35,000 35 3 mo. LIB
          +279 bp.
           1,083 36 Mar. 17, 2034 Mar. 17, 2009  Mar. 2004 35,000 35 3 mo. LIB
          +279 bp.
           1,083 36 Mar. 17, 2034 Mar. 17, 2009 
                            
          Total obligated     $44,644     $44,770          $21,403     $21,530     
                            

          (1)
          Represents the proceeds received from the trustTrust at the date of issuance.

                  In each case, the coupon rate on the debentures is the same as that on the trust securities. Distributions on the trust securities and interest on the debentures are payable quarterly, except for Citigroup Capital III, Citigroup Capital XVIII and Citigroup Capital XXI, on which distributions are payable semiannually.

          During the thirdsecond quarter of 2009, pursuant to the "Exchange Offers",2010 Citigroup converted $5.8 billion liquidation value of trust preferred securities acrossexchanged Citigroup Capital III,Trust XXX for $1.875 billion of senior notes with a coupon of 6% payable semi-annually. The senior notes mature on December 13, 2013.

                  On September 29, 2010, Citigroup modified the Citigroup Capital VII, Citigroup Capital VIII, Citigroup Capital IX, Citigroup Capital X, Citigroup Capital XI, Citigroup Capital XIV, Citigroup Capital XV, Citigroup Capital XVI, Citigroup Capital XVII, Citigroup Capital XVIII, Citigroup Capital XIX, Citigroup Capital XX and Citigroup Capital XXI to common stock and issued $27.1 billion of Citigroup CapitalTrust XXXIII trust preferred securities to the USG in exchange for the Series G and I of preferred stock.


          Table of Contents


          13.    PREFERRED STOCK

                  The following table summarizes the Company's preferred stock outstanding at September 30, 2009, June 30, 2009, and December 31, 2008:

           
            
            
            
           Carrying value
          (in millions of dollars)
           
           
            
           Redemption
          price per
          depositary share /
          preference share
            
           
           
           Dividend rate Number
          of depositary shares
           September 30,
          2009
           June 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
           

          Series A1(1)

            7.000%$50  137,600,000 $ $6,880 $6,880 

          Series B1(1)

            7.000% 50  60,000,000    3,000  3,000 

          Series C1(1)

            7.000% 50  20,000,000    1,000  1,000 

          Series D1(1)

            7.000% 50  15,000,000    750  750 

          Series E(2)

            8.400% 1,000  6,000,000  121  6,000  6,000 

          Series F(3)

            8.500% 25  81,600,000  71  2,040  2,040 

          Series G(4)

            8.000% 1,000,000  7,059    3,529   

          Series H(5)

            5.000% 1,000,000  25,000    23,835  23,727 

          Series I(6)

            8.000% 1,000,000  20,000    19,513  19,513 

          Series J1(1)

            7.000% 50  9,000,000    450  450 

          Series K1(1)

            7.000% 50  8,000,000    400  400 

          Series L2(1)

            7.000% 50  100,000    5  5 

          Series N1(1)

            7.000% 50  300,000    15  15 

          Series T(7)

            6.500% 50  63,373,000  23  3,169  3,169 

          Series AA(8)

            8.125% 25  148,600,000  97  3,715  3,715 
                        

                    $312 $74,301 $70,664 
                           

          (1)
          Issued on January 23, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/1,000th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Non-Cumulative ConvertibleTrust Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after February 15, 2015. Under the terms of pre-existing conversion price reset agreements with holders of Series A, B, C, D, J, K, L1 and N (the "Old Preferred Stock"), on February 17, 2009, Citigroup exchanged shares of new preferred stock (the "New Preferred Stock") for an equal number of shares of Old Preferred Stock. The terms and conditions of the New Preferred Stock were identical in all material respects to the terms and conditions of the Old Preferred Stock, except that the Conversion Price and Conversion Rate of the New Preferred Stock were reset to $26.3517 and 1,897.4108, respectively. All shares of the Old Preferred Stock were canceled. The dividend of $0.88 per depositary share was payable quarterly when, as and if declaredSecurities held by the Company's Board of Directors. Redemption was subject to a capital replacement covenant.

          (2)
          Issued on April 28, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/25th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Fixed Rate/Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after April 30, 2018. Dividends are payable semi-annually for the first 10 years until April 30, 2018 at $42.00 per depositary share and thereafter quarterly at a floating rate when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

          (3)
          Issued on May 13, 2008 and May 28, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/1,000th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after June 15, 2013. The dividend of $0.53 per depositary share is payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

          (4)
          Issued on January 15, 2009 as shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury and the FDIC as consideration for guaranteeing approximately $300.8 billion of assets. Redeemable in whole or in part subject to approval of the investor and compliance with certain conditions. The dividend of $20,000 per preferred share was payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

          (5)
          Issued on October 28, 2008 as shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock toexchanging the U.S. Treasury under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). RedeemableTreasury's $2.234 billion position in whole or in part subject to approval of the investor and compliance with certain conditions. Dividends were payable quarterlythose securities for the first five years until February 15, 2013 at $12,500 per preferred share and thereafter at $22,500 per preferred share when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

          (6)
          Issued on December 31, 2008 as shares of Cumulative Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury under TARP. Redeemable in whole or in part subject to approval of the investor and compliance with certain conditions. The dividend of $20,000 per preferred share was payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors.

          (7)
          Issued on January 23, 2008 and January 29, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/1,000th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after February 15, 2015. Convertible into Citigroup common stock at a conversion rate of approximately 1,482.3503 per share, which is subject to adjustment under certain conditions. The dividend of $0.81 per depositary share is payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors. Redemption is subject to a capital replacement covenant.

          (8)
          Issued on January 25, 2008 as depositary shares, each representing a 1/1,000th interest in a share of the corresponding series of Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock. Redeemable in whole or in part on or after February 15, 2018. The dividend of $0.51 per depositary share is payable quarterly when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors. Redemption is subject to a capital replacement covenant.

                  Other than securities containing customary anti-dilution provisions, Citigroup's only outstanding instruments subject to potential resets are the warrant to purchase 210,084,034 shares of common stock issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of TARP on November 28, 2008, the warrant to purchase 188,501,414 shares of common stock issued to the U.S. Treasury as part of TARP on December 31, 2008, and the warrant to purchase 66,531,728 shares of common stock issued to the U.S. Treasury as consideration for the loss-sharing agreement on January 15, 2009. Under the terms of the warrants, the number of shares of common stock for which the warrants are exercisable and the exercise price of the warrants will be subject to a reset if, prior to the third anniversary of issue date of the warrants, Citigroup issues shares of common stock (or


          Table of Contents

          rights or warrants or other securities exercisable or convertible into or exchangeable for shares of common stock) (collectively, "convertible securities") without consideration or at a consideration per share (or having a conversion price per share) that is less than 90% of the market price of Citigroup's common stock on the last trading day preceding the date of the agreement on pricing such shares (or such convertible securities), subject to specified exceptions.

          Exchange Offers

                  During the third quarter of 2009, Citigroup closed its exchange offers with the private and public holders of preferred stock. The UST matched $25$2.246 billion of these exchange offers. In total, approximately $74 billion in preferred stock was exchanged for common stock and converted into TRuPs asCitigroup Capital Trust XIII Trust Preferred Securities with a resultcoupon of 7.875%, payable quarterly. The U.S. Treasury then sold all of such securities of Citigroup Capital Trust XIII to the completion of the exchange offers.


          Table of Contentspublic.


          14.13.    CHANGES IN ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

                  ChangesThe following table shows the changes in each component of Accumulated"Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (AOCI)" for the first, threesecond and third quarters of 2009 were as follows:2010:

          In millions of dollars Net unrealized
          gains (losses) on
          investment
          securities
           Foreign
          currency
          translation
          adjustment,
          net of hedges
           Cash flow
          hedges
           Pension
          liability
          adjustments
           Accumulated other
          comprehensive
          income (loss)
           

          Balance, December 31, 2008

           $(9,647)$(7,744)$(5,189)$(2,615)$(25,195)

          Cumulative effect of accounting change (ASC 320-10-65- 1/FSP FAS 115-2)

            (413)       (413)
                      

          Balance, January 1, 2009

           $(10,060)$(7,744)$(5,189)$(2,615)$(25,608)

          Decrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)(3)

            31        31 

          Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes

            (11)       (11)

          FX translation adjustment, net of taxes(2)

              (2,974)     (2,974)

          Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3)

                1,483    1,483 

          Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes

                  66  66 
                      

          Change

           $20 $(2,974)$1,483 $66 $(1,405)
                      

          Citigroup Stockholders AOCI balance, March 31, 2009

           $(10,040)$(10,718)$(3,706)$(2,549)$(27,013)
                      

          Decrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)(3)

            2,890        2,890 

          Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes

            95        95 

          FX translation adjustment, net of taxes(4)

              2,406      2,406 

          Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3)

                41    41 

          Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes

                  (62) (62)
                      

          Change

           $2,985 $2,406 $41 $(62)$5,370 
                      

          Citigroup Stockholders AOCI balance, June 30, 2009

           $(7,055)$(8,312)$(3,665)$(2,611)$(21,643)
                      

          Decrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)(3)

            2,968        2,968 

          Less: Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income, net of taxes

            (155)       (155)

          FX translation adjustment, net of taxes(5)

              1,699      1,699 

          Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3)

                (512)   (512)

          Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes

                  (8) (8)
                      

          Change

           $2,813 $1,699 $(512)$(8)$3,992 
                      

          Citigroup Stockholders AOCI balance, September 30, 2009

           $(4,242)$(6,613)$(4,177)$(2,619)$(17,651)
                      
          In millions of dollars Net unrealized
          gains (losses) on
          investment
          securities
           Foreign
          currency
          translation
          adjustment,
          net of hedges
           Cash flow
          hedges
           Pension
          liability
          adjustments
           Accumulated other
          comprehensive
          income (loss)
           

          Balance, December 31, 2009

           $(4,347)$(7,947)$(3,182)$(3,461)$(18,937)

          Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)

            1,210        1,210 

          Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income, net of taxes

            (28)       (28)

          Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes(2)

              (279)     (279)

          Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3)

                223    223 

          Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes(4)

                  (48) (48)
                      

          Change

           $1,182 $(279)$223 $(48)$1,078 
                      

          Balance, March 31, 2010

           $(3,165)$(8,226)$(2,959)$(3,509)$(17,859)

          Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)

            967        967 

          Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income, net of taxes

            (61)       (61)

          Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes(2)

              (2,036)     (2,036)

          Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3)

                (225)   (225)

          Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes(4)

                  44  44 
                      

          Change

           $906 $(2,036)$(225)$44 $(1,311)
                      

          Balance, June 30, 2010

           $(2,259)$(10,262)$(3,184)$(3,465)$(19,170)

          Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes(1)

            1,729        1,729 

          Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income, net of taxes

            (467)       (467)

          Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes(2)

              2,755      2,755 

          Cash flow hedges, net of taxes(3)

                (121)   (121)

          Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes(4)

                  (35) (35)
                      

          Change

           $1,262 $2,755 $(121)$(35)$3,861 
                      

          Balance, September 30, 2010

           $(997)$(7,507)$(3,305)$(3,500)$(15,309)
                      

          (1)
          Primarily relatedSee Note 10 to AFS Prime MBS, municipalthe Consolidated Financial Statements for details of the unrealized gains and other debtlosses on Citigroup's Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities.

          (2)
          Reflects, among other items, the movements in the Japanese Yen, Korean Won, Euro, Pound Sterling, Polish Zloty, Mexican Peso and the Singapore Dollar against the U.S. Dollar, and changes in related tax effects.

          (3)
          Decrease (increase) in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities, net of taxes includes the change in the hedged senior debt securities retained from the sale of a portfolio of highly leveraged loans. The offsetting change in the corresponding cash flow hedge is reflected in Cash Flow hedges, net of taxes.

          (4)
          Reflects, among other items,Primarily impacted by the movements in the British Pound,pound, Euro, Japanese yen, Korean won and Mexican Peso, Japanese Yen, Australian Dollar, Korean Won, and the Europeso against the U.S. dollar, and changes in related tax effects.effects and hedges.

          (5)(3)
          Primarily driven by Citigroup's pay fixed/receive floating interest rate swap programs that are hedging the floating rates on deposits and long-term debt.

          (4)
          Reflects among other items,adjustments to the movements infunded status of pension and postretirement plans, which is the Japanese Yen, Korean Won, Brazilian Real, Australian Dollar, Polish Zloty, Canadian Dollar, Euro, British Pounddifference between the fair value of the plan assets and the Mexican Peso against the U.S. dollar, and changes in related tax effects.projected benefit obligation.

          Table of Contents


          15.14.    SECURITIZATIONS AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

          Overview

                  Citigroup and its subsidiaries are involved with several types of off-balance sheet arrangements, including special purpose entities (SPEs). See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of impending accounting changes to the accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and Consolidationconsolidation of Variable Interest Entities,VIEs, including the elimination of qualifying SPEsQSPEs.

          Uses of SPEs

                  An SPE is an entity designed to fulfill a specific limited need of the company that organized it.

          The principal uses of SPEs are to obtain liquidity and favorable capital treatment by securitizing certain of Citigroup's financial assets, to assist clients in securitizing their financial assets, and to create investment products for clients. SPEs may be organized in many legal forms including trusts, partnerships or corporations. In a securitization, the company transferring assets to an SPE converts all (or a portion) of those assets into cash before they would have been realized in the normal course of business, through the SPE's issuance of debt and equity instruments, certificates, commercial paper and other notes of indebtedness, which are recorded on the balance sheet of the SPE and not reflected onin the transferring company's balance sheet, assuming applicable accounting requirements are satisfied. Investors usually have recourse to the assets in the SPE and often benefit from other credit enhancements, such as a collateral account or over collateralizationover-collateralization in the form of excess assets in the SPE, a line of credit, or from a liquidity facility, such as a line of credit, liquidity put option or asset purchase agreement. The SPE can typically obtain a more favorable credit rating from rating agencies than the transferor could obtain for its own debt issuances, resulting in less expensive financing costs.costs than unsecured debt. The SPE may also enter into derivative contracts in order to convert the yield or currency of the underlying assets to match the needs of the SPE investors or to limit or change the credit risk of the SPE. Citigroup may be the provider of certain credit enhancements as well as the counterparty to any related derivative contracts.

          Since QSPEs were eliminated, most of Citigroup's SPEs may be Qualifying SPEs (QSPEs) or Variable Interest Entities (VIEs) or neither.

          Qualifying SPEs

                  QSPEs are a special class of SPEs that have significant limitations on the types of assets and derivative instruments they may own or enter into and the types and extent of activities and decision-making they may engage in. Generally, QSPEs are passive entities designed to purchase assets and pass through the cash flows from those assets to the investors in the QSPE. QSPEs may not actively manage their assets through discretionary sales and are generally limited to making decisions inherent in servicing activities and issuance of liabilities. QSPEs are generally exempt from consolidation by the transferor of assets to the QSPE and any investor or counterparty.now VIEs.

          Variable Interest Entities

                  VIEs are entities defined as entities that have either a total equity investment that is insufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or whose equity investors lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest (i.e., ability to make significant decisions through voting rights, and right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity andor obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity). Investors that finance the VIE through debt or equity interests or other counterparties that provide other forms of support, such as guarantees, subordinated fee arrangements, or certain types of derivative contracts, are variable interest holders in the entity. TheSince January 1, 2010, the variable interest holder, if any, that willhas a controlling financial interest in a VIE is deemed to be the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE. Citigroup would be deemed to have a controlling financial interest if it has both of the following characteristics:

            1.
            Power to direct activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance; and

            2.
            Obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

                  The Company must evaluate its involvement in each VIE and understand the purpose and design of the entity, the role the Company had in the entity's design, and its involvement in its ongoing activities. The Company then must evaluate which activities most significantly impact the economic performance of the VIE and who has the power to direct such activities.

                  For those VIEs where the Company determines that it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE's economic performance, the Company then must evaluate its economic interests, if any, and determine whether it could absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. When evaluating whether the Company has an obligation to absorb losses that could potentially be significant, it considers the maximum exposure to such loss without consideration of probability. Such obligations could be in various forms, including but not limited to, debt and equity investments, guarantees, liquidity agreements, and certain derivative contracts.

                  Prior to January 1, 2010, the variable interest holder, if any, that would absorb a majority of the entity's expected losses, receive a majority of the entity's expected residual returns or both iswas deemed to be the primary beneficiary and must consolidateconsolidated the VIE. Consolidation of athe VIE iswas determined based primarily on the variability generated in scenarios that are considered most likely to occur, rather than based on scenarios that are considered more remote. Certain variable interests may absorb significant amounts of losses or residual returns contractually, but if those scenarios are considered very unlikely to occur, they may not lead to consolidation of the VIE.

                  All of these facts and circumstances are taken into consideration when determining whether the Company has variable interests that would deem it the primary beneficiary and, therefore, require consolidation of the related VIE or otherwise rise to the level where disclosure would provide useful information to the users of the Company's financial statements. In some cases, it is qualitatively clear based on the extent of the Company's involvement or the seniority of its investments that the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE. In othermany cases, a more detailed and quantitative analysis iswas required to make such athis determination.

                  The Company generally considers the following types of involvement to be significant:

            assisting in the structuring of a transaction and retaining any amount of debt financing (e.g., loans, notes, bonds or other debt instruments) or an equity investment (e.g., common shares, partnership interests or warrants);

            writing a "liquidity put" or other liquidity facility to support the issuance of short-term notes;

            writing credit protection (e.g., guarantees, letters of credit, credit default swaps or total return swaps where the Company receives the total return or risk on the assets held by the VIE); or

            certain transactions where the Company is the investment manager and receives variable fees for services.

                  In various other transactions, the Company may act as a derivative counterparty (for example, interest rate swap, cross-currency swap, or purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Company pays the total return on certain assets to the SPE); may act as underwriter or placement agent; may provide administrative, trustee, or other services; or may make a market in debt securities or other instruments issued by VIEs. The Company generally considers such involvement, by itself, "not significant".not to be variable interests and thus not an indicator of power or potentially significant benefits or losses.


          Table of Contents

                  Citigroup's involvement with QSPEsconsolidated and Consolidated and Unconsolidatedunconsolidated VIEs with which the Company holds significant variable interests or has continuing involvement through servicing a majority of the assets in a VIE as of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 20082009 is presented below:

          As of September 30, 2009 
          As of September 30, 2010As of September 30, 2010 

            
            
            
            
           Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs(1) 
            
            
            
           Maximum exposure to loss in significant unconsolidated VIEs(1) 

            
            
            
            
           Funded exposures(2) Unfunded exposures(3) 
            
            
            
           Funded exposures(2) Unfunded exposures(3) Total 

           Total
          involvement
          with SPE
          assets
            
            
            
           
           Total
          involvement
          with SPE
          assets
            
            
           
          In millions of dollars QSPE
          assets
           Consolidated
          VIE assets
           Significant
          unconsolidated
          VIE assets(4)
           Debt
          investments
           Equity
          investments
           Funding
          commitments
           Guarantees
          and
          derivatives
           In millions of dollars Consolidated
          VIE / SPE
          assets(4)
           Significant
          unconsolidated
          VIE assets(4)(5)
           Debt
          investments
           Equity
          investments
           Funding
          commitments
           Guarantees
          and
          derivatives
           Total 

          Citicorp

           

          Citicorp

           

          Credit card securitizations

           $78,346 $78,346 $ $ $ $ $ $ 

          Credit card securitizations

           $62,157 $62,157 $ $ $ $ $ $ 

          Mortgage securitizations(6)

          Mortgage securitizations(6)

           

          U.S. agency-sponsored

           172,133  172,133 1,581   29 1,610 

          Non-agency-sponsored

           8,875 2,479 6,396 415    415 

          Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

           24,733   24,733 109  24,250 374 

          Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

           30,459 22,820 7,639   7,639  7,639 

          Third-party commercial paper conduits

           4,114   4,114   353  

          Third-party commercial paper conduits

           4,334  4,334 288  298  586 

          Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

           3,477   3,477 15    

          Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

           6,513  6,513 133    133 

          Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

           3,991   3,991 44    

          Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

           4,426  4,426 96    96 

          Mortgage loan securitization

           82,916 82,916       

          Asset-based financing

           19,763  1,426 18,337 3,965 44 649 491 

          Asset-based financing

           17,804 1,015 16,789 5,500  1,937 15 7,452 

          Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

           19,754 710 9,781 9,263   6,079 689 

          Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

           19,722 9,088 10,634   7,443 469 7,912 

          Municipal investments

           577   577  40 17  

          Municipal investments

           12,562 256 12,306 641 2,798 1,110  4,549 

          Client intermediation

           7,525  2,948 4,577 1,225 12   

          Client intermediation

           5,612 1,235 4,377 1,236 8   1,244 

          Investment funds

           108  38 70 13   2 

          Investment funds

           3,336 233 3,103 2 35  23 60 

          Trust preferred securities

           34,531   34,531  128   

          Trust preferred securities

           21,673  21,673  128   128 

          Other

           7,643 1,809 1,782 4,052 258  10  

          Other

           4,998 1,460 3,538 542 16 115 133 806 
                                             

          Total

           $287,478 $163,781 $15,975 $107,722 $5,629 $224 $31,358 $1,556 

          Total

           $374,604 $100,743 $273,861 $10,434 $2,985 $18,542 $669 $32,630 
                                             

          Citi Holdings

           

          Citi Holdings

           

          Credit card securitizations

           $41,315 $41,315 $ $ $ $ $ $ 

          Credit card securitizations

           $33,079 $32,604 $475 $ $ $ $ $ 

          Mortgage securitizations

           513,004 513,004       

          Mortgage securitizations(6)

          Mortgage securitizations(6)

           

          U.S. agency-sponsored

           244,496  244,496 2,127   114 2,241 

          Non-agency-sponsored

           23,996 3,445 20,551 122    122 

          Student loan securitizations

           14,691 14,691       

          Student loan securitizations

           35,041 35,041       

          Auto loan securitizations

          Auto loan securitizations

                   

          Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

           15,106  153 14,953   14,935 18 

          Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

           105 105       

          Third-party commercial paper conduits

           7,770   7,770 298  252  

          Third-party commercial paper conduits

           3,411  3,411   252  252 

          Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

           21,148  8,491 12,657 962   463 

          Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

           8,344 105 8,239 372   125 497 

          Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

           9,896  72 9,824 1,543  32 247 

          Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

           13,259 291 12,968 1,554  8 392 1,954 

          Asset-based financing

           53,381  430 52,951 16,166 75 1,697  

          Asset-based financing

           41,237 3 41,234 13,334 4 455 2 13,795 

          Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

           2,336  2,336      

          Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

           5 5       

          Municipal investments

           16,294  879 15,415  2,012 529  

          Municipal investments

           4,597  4,597 77 193 161  431 

          Client intermediation

           671  226 445 43   353 

          Client intermediation

           700 219 481 62   347 409 

          Investment funds

           10,042  1,283 8,759 — — 247 169  

          Investment funds

           3,216 795 2,421 8 72 284  364 

          Other

           3,427 694 1,866 867 203 125 224  

          Other

           2,708 1,024 1,684 262 109 125  496 
                                             

          Total

           $709,081 $569,704 $15,736 $123,641 $19,215 $2,459 $17,838 $1,081 

          Total

           $414,194 $73,637 $340,557 $17,918 $378 $1,285 $980 $20,561 
                                             

          Total Citigroup

           $996,559 $733,485 $31,711 $231,363 $24,844 $2,683 $49,196 $2,637 

          Total Citigroup

           $788,798 $174,380 $614,418 $28,352 $3,363 $19,827 $1,649 $53,191 
                                             

          (1)
          The definition of maximum exposure to loss is included in the text that follows.

          (2)
          Included in Citigroup's September 30, 20092010 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

          (3)
          Not included in Citigroup's September 30, 20092010 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

          (4)
          A significantDue to the adoption of ASC 810,Consolidation (formerly FASB Interpretation No. 46(R),Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities) on January 1, 2010, the previously disclosed assets of former QSPEs are now included in either the "Consolidated VIE / SPE assets" or the "Significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity whereassets" columns for the Company has any variable interest considered to be significant, regardless of the likelihood of loss or the notional amount of exposure.

          Table of Contents

          As of September 30, 2009
          (continued)
           As of December 31, 2008(1)
          In millions of dollars
           
          Total maximum exposure
          to loss in significant
          unconsolidated VIEs
          (continued)(3)
           Total
          involvement
          with SPEs
           QSPE
          assets
           Consolidated
          VIE assets
           Significant
          unconsolidated
          VIE assets(2)
           Maximum exposure to
          loss in significant
          unconsolidated
          VIE assets(3)
           
          $ $78,254 $78,254 $ $ $ 
           24,733  36,108      36,108  36,108 
           353  10,589      10,589  579 
           15  4,042      4,042  12 
           44  3,343      3,343  2 
             84,953  84,953       
           5,149  16,930    1,629  15,301  4,556 
           6,768  27,047  5,964  12,135  8,948  7,884 
           57  593      593  35 
           1,237  8,332    3,480  4,852  1,476 
           15  71    45  26  31 
           128  23,899      23,899  162 
           268  10,394  3,737  2,419  4,238  370 
                      
          $38,767 $304,555 $172,908 $19,708 $111,939 $51,215 
                      
          $ $45,613 $45,613 $ $ $ 
             586,410  586,407  3     
             15,650  15,650       
           14,953  23,527      23,527  23,527 
           550  10,166      10,166  820 
           1,425  26,018    11,466  14,552  1,461 
           1,822  19,610    122  19,488  1,680 
           17,938  85,224    2,218  83,006  23,676 
             3,024  540  2,484     
           2,541  16,545    866  15,679  2,915 
           396  1,132    331  801  61 
           416  10,330    2,084  8,246  158 
           552  9,472  1,014  4,306  4,152  892 
                      
          $40,593 $852,721 $649,224 $23,880 $179,617 $55,190 
                      
          $79,360 $1,157,276 $822,132 $43,588 $291,556 $106,405 
                      

          (1)
          Reclassified to conform to the current period's presentation.September 30, 2010 period.

          (2)(5)
          A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity where the Company has any variable interest considered to be significant, regardless of the likelihood of loss or the notional amount of exposure.

          (3)(6)
          A significant portion of the Company's securitized mortgage portfolio was transferred from Citi Holdings to Citicorp during the first quarter of 2010.

          Table of Contents

           
            
            
            
           As of December 31, 2009 
          In millions of dollars Total
          involvement
          with SPE assets
           QSPE
          assets
           Consolidated
          VIE assets
           Significant
          unconsolidated
          VIE assets(1)
           Maximum exposure to
          loss in significant
          unconsolidated VIEs(2)
           

          Citicorp

                          

          Credit card securitizations

           $78,833 $78,833 $ $ $ 

          Mortgage securitizations

                          
           

          U.S. agency-sponsored

            180,487  180,487       
           

          Non-agency-sponsored

            84,462  84,462       

          Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

            36,327      36,327  36,326 

          Third-party commercial paper conduits

            3,718      3,718  353 

          Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

            2,785      2,785  21 

          Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

            5,409      5,409  120 

          Asset-based financing

            19,612    1,279  18,333  5,221 

          Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

            19,455  705  9,623  9,127  6,841 

          Municipal investments

            10,906    11  10,895  2,370 

          Client intermediation

            8,607    2,749  5,858  881 

          Investment funds

            93    39  54  10 

          Trust preferred securities

            19,345      19,345  128 

          Other

            7,380  1,808  1,838  3,734  446 
                      

          Total

           $477,419 $346,295 $15,539 $115,585 $52,717 
                      

          Citi Holdings

                          

          Credit card securitizations

           $42,274 $42,274 $ $ $ 

          Mortgage securitizations

                          
           

          U.S. agency-sponsored

            288,605  288,605       
           

          Non-agency-sponsored

            19,899  19,899       

          Student loan securitizations

            14,343  14,343       

          Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

            98    98     

          Third-party commercial paper conduits

            5,776      5,776  439 

          Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs)

            24,157    7,614  16,543  1,158 

          Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

            13,515    142  13,373  1,658 

          Asset-based financing

            52,598    370  52,228  18,385 

          Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

            1,999    1,999     

          Municipal investments

            5,364    882  4,482  375 

          Client intermediation

            675    230  445  396 

          Investment funds

            10,178    1,037  9,141  268 

          Other

            3,732  610  1,472  1,650  604 
                      

          Total

           $483,213 $365,731 $13,844 $103,638 $23,283 
                      

          Total Citigroup

           $960,632 $712,026 $29,383 $219,223 $76,000 
                      

          (1)
          A significant unconsolidated VIE is an entity where the Company has any variable interest considered to be significant, regardless of the likelihood of loss or the notional amount of exposure.

          (2)
          The definition of maximum exposure to loss is included in the text that follows.

          Table of Contents

                  ThisThe previous table does not include:

            certain venture capital investments made by some of the Company's private equity subsidiaries, as the Company accounts for these investments in accordance with the Investment Company Audit Guide;

            certain limited partnerships that are investment funds that qualify for the deferral from the requirements of SFAS 167 where the Company is the general partner and the limited partners have the right to replace the general partner or liquidate the funds;

            certain investment funds for which the Company provides investment management services and personal estate trusts for which the Company provides administrative, trustee and/or investment management services;

            VIEs structured by third parties where the Company holds securities in inventory. These investments are made on arm's-length terms;

            certain positions in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities held by the Company, which are classified asTrading account assets orInvestments, where the Company has no other involvement with the related securitization entity (for more information on these positions, please see Notes 9 and 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements);

            certain representations and warranties exposures inSecurities and Banking mortgage-backed and asset-backed securitizations, where the Company has no variable interest or continuing involvement as servicer. The outstanding balance was approximately $26 billion at September 30, 2010; and

            certain representations and warranties exposures in Consumer mortgage securitizations, where the original mortgage loans balances are no longer outstanding.

          Prior to January 1, 2010, the table didnot include:

            assetstransferred assets to a VIE where the transfer did not qualify as a sale and where the Company did not have any other involvement that is deemed to be a variable interest with the VIE. These transfers are accounted for as secured borrowings by the Company.

                  The asset balances for consolidated VIEs represent the carrying amounts of the assets consolidated by the Company. The carrying amount may represent the amortized cost or the current fair value of the assets depending on the legal form of the asset (e.g., security or loan) and the Company's standard accounting policies for the asset type and line of business.

                  The asset balances for unconsolidated VIEs where the Company has significant involvement represent the most current information available to the Company. In most cases, the asset balances represent an amortized cost basis without regard to impairments in fair value, unless fair value information is readily available to the Company. For VIEs that obtain asset exposures synthetically through derivative instruments (for example, synthetic CDOs), the table includes the full original notional amount of the derivative as an asset.

                  The maximum funded exposure represents the balance sheet carrying amount of the Company's investment in the VIE. It reflects the initial amount of cash invested in the VIE plus any accrued interest and is adjusted for any impairments in value recognized in earnings and any cash principal payments received. The maximum exposure of unfunded positions represents the remaining undrawn committed amount, including liquidity and credit facilities provided by the Company, or the notional amount of a derivative instrument considered to be a variable interest, adjusted for any declines in fair value recognized in earnings. In certain transactions, the Company has entered into derivative instruments or other arrangements that are not considered variable interests in the VIE (e.g., interest rate swaps, cross-currency swaps, or where the Company is the purchaser of credit protection under a credit default swap or total return swap where the Company pays the total return on certain assets to the SPE). Receivables under such arrangements are not included in the maximum exposure amounts.


          Table of Contents

          Funding Commitments for Significant Unconsolidated VIEs—Liquidity Facilities and Loan Commitments

                  The following table presents the notional amount of liquidity facilities and loan commitments that are classified as funding commitments in the SPE table as of September 30, 2009:2010:

          In billions of dollars Liquidity Facilities Loan Commitments 
          In millions of dollars Liquidity Facilities Loan Commitments 

          Citicorp

            

          Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

           $22,456 $1,794  $7,639 $ 

          Third-party commercial paper conduits

           353   298  

          Asset-based financing

            649  5 1,932 

          Municipal securities tender option bond trusts (TOBs)

           6,079   7,443  

          Municipal investments

            17   1,110 

          Other

           10    115 
                    

          Total Citicorp

           $28,898 $2,460  $15,385 $3,157 
                    

          Citi Holdings

            

          Citi-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits (ABCP)

           $13,329 $1,606 

          Third-party commercial paper conduits

           252   $252 $ 

          Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

           32    8 

          Asset-based financing

            1,697   455 

          Municipal investments

            529   161 

          Investment Funds

            169 

          Investment funds

            284 

          Other

            224   125 
                    

          Total Citi Holdings

           $13,613 $4,225  $252 $1,033 
                    

          Total Citigroup funding commitments

           $42,511 $6,685  $15,637 $4,190 
                    

          Table of Contents

          Citicorp'sCiticorp and Citi Holdings Consolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet ClassificationVIEs

                  The following table presents the carrying amounts and classifications of consolidated assets that are collateral for consolidated VIE obligations:and SPE obligations.

          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
           

          Cash

           $0.0 $0.7 

          Trading account assets

            3.5  4.3 

          Investments

            10.2  12.5 

          Loans

            0.3  0.5 

          Other assets

            2.0  1.7 
                

          Total assets of consolidated VIEs

           $16.0 $19.7 
                

                  The following table presentsCompany engages in on-balance-sheet securitizations which are securitizations that do not qualify for sales treatment; thus, the carrying amounts and classification ofassets remain on the third-party liabilities of the consolidated VIEs:

          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
           

          Short-term borrowings

           $9.4 $14.2 

          Long-term debt

            5.6  5.6 

          Other liabilities

            0.2  0.9 
                

          Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs

           $15.2 $20.7 
                

          Company's balance sheet. The consolidated VIEs included in the table abovetables below represent hundreds of separate entities with which the Company is involved. In general, the third-party investors in the obligations of consolidated VIEs have legal recourse only to the assets of the VIEs and do not have such recourse to the Company, except where the Company has provided a guarantee to the investors or is the counterparty to certain derivative transactions involving the VIE. In addition, the assets are generally restricted only to pay such liabilities. Thus, the Company's maximum legal exposure to loss due to outstanding third-party financing related to consolidated VIEs is significantly less than the carrying value of the consolidated VIE assets. Intercompany assets due to outstanding third-party financing. Intercompanyand liabilities are excluded from the table.

          Citi Holdings' Consolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification

          All assets are restricted from being sold or pledged as collateral. The following table presentscash flows from these assets are the carrying amounts and classifications of consolidated assets thatonly source used to pay down the associated liabilities, which are collateral for consolidated VIE obligations:non-recourse to the Company's general assets.

          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
           

          Cash

           $0.5 $1.2 

          Trading account assets

            10.9  16.6 

          Investments

            3.1  3.3 

          Loans

            0.6  2.1 

          Other assets

            0.6  0.7 
                

          Total assets of consolidated VIEs

           $15.7 $23.9 
                

                  The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of the third-party liabilities of the consolidated VIEs:

           September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
            Citicorp Citi Holdings Citigroup Citicorp Citi Holdings Citigroup 

          Trading account liabilities

           $0.2 $0.5 

          Cash

           $0.3 $2.0 $2.3 $ $0.7 $0.7 

          Trading account assets

           3.5 1.4 4.9 3.7 9.5 13.2 

          Investments

           9.4 0.1 9.5 9.8 2.7 12.5 

          Total loans, net

           86.0 38.5 124.5 0.1 0.4 0.5 

          Other

           1.6 31.6 33.2 1.9 0.5 2.4 
                       

          Total assets

           $100.8 $73.6 $174.4 $15.5 $13.8 $29.3 
                       

          Short-term borrowings

           3.0 2.8  $35.1 $1.3 $36.4 $9.5 $2.6 $12.1 

          Long-term debt

           0.5 1.2  48.7 20.9 69.6 4.6 0.3 4.9 

          Other liabilities

           1.2 2.1  1.2 30.7 31.9 0.1 1.5 1.6 
                            

          Total liabilities of consolidated VIEs

           $4.9 $6.6 

          Total liabilities

           $85.0 $52.9 $137.9 $14.2 $4.4 $18.6 
                            

          Citicorp'sCiticorp and Citi Holdings Significant Interests in Unconsolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification

                  The following table presentstables present the carrying amounts and classification of significant interests in unconsolidated VIEs:

          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
           

          Trading account assets

           $3.4 $1.9 

          Investments

            0.8  0.2 

          Loans

            2.4  3.5 

          Other assets

            0.6  0.4 
                

          Total assets of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs

           $7.2 $6.0 
                

          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
           

          Long-term debt

           $0.5 $0.4 
                

          Total liabilities of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs

           $0.5 $0.4 
                

          Citi Holdings' Significant Interests in Unconsolidated VIEs—Balance Sheet Classification

                  The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of significant interests in unconsolidated VIEs:

          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
           

          Trading account assets

           $2.8 $4.4 

          Investments

            8.8  8.2 

          Loans

            12.6  12.4 

          Other assets

            0.1  2.6 
                

          Total assets of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs

           $24.3 $27.6 
                

           September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
            Citicorp Citi Holdings Citigroup Citicorp Citi Holdings Citigroup 

          Trading account liabilities

           $0.0 $0.2 

          Trading account assets

           $3.3 $2.6 $5.9 $3.2 $3.1 $6.3 

          Investments

           3.3 6.8 10.1 2.0 7.3 9.3 

          Loans

           4.4 7.7 12.1 2.3 10.5 12.8 

          Other

           2.2 1.9 4.1 0.5 0.1 0.6 
                       

          Total assets

           $13.2 $19.0 $32.2 $8.0 $21.0 $29.0 
                       

          Long-term debt

           $0.5 $0.5 $1.0 $0.5 $ $0.5 

          Other liabilities

           0.3 0.6  0.1  0.1 0.3 0.2 0.5 
                            

          Total liabilities of significant interest in unconsolidated VIEs

           $0.3 $0.8 

          Total liabilities

           $0.6 $0.5 $1.1 $0.8 $0.2 $1.0 
                            

          Table of Contents

          Credit Card Securitizations

                  The Company securitizes credit card receivables through trusts that are established to purchase the receivables. Citigroup sellstransfers receivables into the QSPE trusts on a non-recourse basis. Credit card securitizations are revolving securitizations; that is, as customers pay their credit card balances, the cash proceeds are used to purchase new receivables and replenish the receivables in the trust. Prior to 2010, such transfers were accounted for as sale transactions under SFAS 140 and, accordingly, the sold assets were removed from the consolidated balance sheet and a gain or loss was recognized in connection with the transaction. With the adoption of SFAS 166 and SFAS 167, beginning in 2010 the trusts are treated as consolidated entities, because, as servicer, Citigroup has power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the trusts and also holds a seller's interest and certain securities issued by the trusts, and provides liquidity facilities to the trusts, which could result in potentially significant losses or benefits from the trusts. Accordingly, the transferred credit card receivables are required to remain on the Consolidated Balance Sheet with no gain or loss recognized. The debt issued by the trusts to third parties is included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

          The Company relies on securitizations to fund a significant portion of its managedcredit card businesses in North America Cards business.

          America. The following table reflects amounts related to the Company's securitized credit card receivables at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:receivables:

           
           Citicorp Citi Holdings 
          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
           September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
           

          Principal amount of credit card receivables in trusts

           $78.3 $78.3 $41.3 $45.7 
                    

          Ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables:

                       

          Sold to investors via trust-issued securities

            65.5  68.2  26.5  30.0 

          Retained by Citigroup as trust-issued securities

            5.1  1.2  9.5  5.4 

          Retained by Citigroup via non-certificated interests recorded as consumer loans

            7.7  8.9  5.3  10.3 
                    

          Total ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables

           $78.3 $78.3 $41.3 $45.7 
                    

          Other amounts recorded on the balance sheet related to interests retained in the trusts:

                       

          Other retained interests in securitized assets

           $1.3 $1.2 $1.6 $2.0 

          Residual interest in securitized assets(1)

            0.3  0.3  1.0  1.4 

          Amounts payable to trusts

            1.1  1.0  0.7  0.7 
                    
           
           Citicorp Citi Holdings 
          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009(2)
           

          Principal amount of credit card receivables in trusts

           $67.8 $78.8 $33.2 $42.3 
                    

          Ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables

                       
           

          Sold to investors via trust-issued securities

            48.1  66.5  16.3  28.2 
           

          Retained by Citigroup as trust-issued securities

            4.3  5.0  7.2  10.1 
           

          Retained by Citigroup via non-certificated interests

            15.4  7.3  9.7  4.0 
                    

          Total ownership interests in principal amount of trust credit card receivables

           $67.8 $78.8 $33.2 $42.3 
                    

          Other amounts recorded on the balance sheet related to interests retained in the trusts

                       
           

          Other retained interests in securitized assets

            NA $1.4  NA $1.6 
           

          Residual interest in securitized assets(1)

            NA  0.3  NA  1.2 
           

          Amounts payable to trusts

            NA  1.2  NA  0.8 
                    

          (1)
          September 30,December 31, 2009 balances include net unbilled interest of $0.3 billion for Citicorp and $0.4 billion for Citi Holdings. December 31, 2008 balances included net unbilled interest

          (2)
          Includes information related to the Broadway Trust which was sold during the third quarter of $0.3B for Citicorp and $0.3B for Citi Holdings.2010.

          Credit Card Securitizations—Citicorp

                  In the third quarter of 2009 and 2008, theThe Company recorded net gains (losses) from securitization of Citicorp's credit card receivables of $102 million and ($682) million, and $253 million during the three and ($828) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.2009. Net gains (losses) reflect the following:

            incremental gains (losses) from new securitizations;

            the reversal of the allowance for loan losses associated with receivables sold;

            net gains on replenishments of the trust assets offset by other-than-temporary impairments; and

            changes in fair value for the portion of the residual interest classified as trading assets.

          Table of Contents

                  The following tables summarizetable summarizes selected cash flow information related to Citicorp's credit card securitizations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:


           Three months ended  Three months ended September 30, 
          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           September 30,
          2008
            2010 2009 

          Proceeds from new securitizations

           $1.0 $0.8  $ $1.0 

          Pay down of maturing notes

           (1.0) N/A 

          Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

           38.5 42.4  N/A 38.5 

          Contractual servicing fees received

           0.3 0.3  N/A 0.3 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

           0.7 1.0  N/A 0.7 
                    


          N/A—Not applicable due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167


           Nine months ended  Nine months ended September 30, 
          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           September 30,
          2008
            2010 2009 

          Proceeds from new securitizations

           $11.7 $10.0  $ $11.7 

          Pay down of maturing notes

           (18.4) N/A 

          Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

           110.0 129.1  N/A 110.0 

          Contractual servicing fees received

           1.0 1.0  N/A 1.0 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

           2.3 3.1  N/A 2.3 
                    

          N/A—Not applicable due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167

          Managed Loans

                  As of September 30, 2009previously mentioned, prior to 2010, securitized receivables were treated as sold and December 31, 2008,removed from the residual interestbalance sheet. Beginning in 2010, all securitized credit card receivables was valued at $0 for Citicorp. As such, key assumptions usedare included in measuring the fair value ofConsolidated Balance Sheet. Accordingly, the residual interest are not provided for the three months ended September 30, 2009 or as of September 30, 2009. Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the residual interests at the date of sale or securitization of Citicorp's credit card receivables for the three months ended September 30 are as follows:


          September 30,
          2009
          September 30,
          2008

          Discount rate

          NA14.5% to 17.4%

          Constant prepayment rate

          NA5.9% to 20.0%

          Anticipated net credit losses

          NA5.8% to 6.2%

          Table of Contents

                  At September 30, 2009, the sensitivity of the fair valueManaged-basis (Managed) presentation is only relevant prior to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:

          In millions of dollars Residual
          interest
           Retained
          certificates
           Other
          retained
          interests
           

          Carrying value of retained interests

           $ $5,186 $1,547 
                  

          Discount rates

                    
           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $ $(6)$(1)
           

          Adverse change of 20%

              (12) (2)

          Constant prepayment rate

                    
           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $ $ $ 
           

          Adverse change of 20%

                 

          Anticipated net credit losses

                    
           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $ $ $(31)
           

          Adverse change of 20%

                (62)
                  

          Managed Loans—Citicorp2010.

                  After securitization of credit card receivables, the Company continues to maintain credit card customer account relationships and provides servicing for receivables transferred to the trusts. As a result, the Company considers the securitized credit card receivables to be part of the business it manages.

                  Managed-basis (Managed) presentations are non-GAAP financial measures. Managed presentations include results from both the on-balance sheeton-balance-sheet loans and off-balance sheetoff-balance-sheet loans, and exclude the impact of card securitization activity. Managed presentations assume that securitized loans have not been sold and present the results of the securitized loans in the same manner as Citigroup's owned loans. Citigroup's management believes that Managed presentations provide a greater understanding of ongoing operations and enhance comparability of those results in prior periods as well as demonstrating the effects of unusual gains and charges in the current period. Management further believes that a meaningful analysis of the Company's financial performance requires an understanding of the factors underlying that performance and that investors find it useful to see these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze financial performance without the impact of unusual items that may obscure trends in Citigroup's underlying performance.

          Managed Loans—Citicorp

                  The following tables present a reconciliation between the Managed basis and on-balance sheeton-balance-sheet credit card portfolios and the related delinquencies (loans which are 90 days or more past due) and credit losses, net of recoveries.

          In millions of dollars, except loans in billions September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
            September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           

          Loan amounts, at period end

            

          On balance sheet

           $44.3 $45.5  $111.0 $44.8 

          Securitized amounts

           70.8 69.5   72.6 
                    

          Total managed loans

           $115.1 $115.0  $111.0 $117.4 
                    

          Delinquencies, at period end

            

          On balance sheet

           $1,160 $1,126  $2,394 $1,165 

          Securitized amounts

           1,730 1,543   2,121 
                    

          Total managed delinquencies

           $2,890 $2,669  $2,394 $3,286 
                    

           

          Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the
          three months ended September 30,
           2009 2008  2010 2009 

          On balance sheet

           $1,047 $779  $2,397 $1,047 

          Securitized amounts

           1,876 1,123   1,876 
                    

          Total managed

           $2,923 $1,902  $2,397 $2,923 
                    

           

          Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the
          nine months ended September 30,
           2009 2008  2010 2009 

          On balance sheet

           $2,862 $2,117  $7,766 $2,862 

          Securitized amounts

           5,205 3,046   5,205 
                    

          Total managed

           $8,067 $5,163  $7,766 $8,067 
                    

          Credit Card Securitizations—SecuritizationsCiti Holdings

                  In the third quarter of 2009 and 2008, theThe Company recorded net gains (losses)losses from securitization of Citi Holding'sHoldings' credit card receivables of ($105)$(105) million and ($762) million, and ($781) million and ($570)$(781) million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.2009.

                  The following tables summarizetable summarizes selected cash flow information related to Citi Holding'sHoldings' credit card securitizations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:

           
           Three months ended 
          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           September 30,
          2008
           

          Proceeds from new securitizations

           $4.3 $2.5 

          Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

            11.1  13.9 

          Contractual servicing fees received

            0.2  0.2 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

            0.7  0.8 
                


           
           Three months ended September 30, 
          In billions of dollars 2010 2009 

          Proceeds from new securitizations

           $1.8 $4.3 

          Pay down of maturing notes

            (2.1) N/A 

          Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

            N/A  11.1 

          Contractual servicing fees received

            N/A  0.2 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

            N/A  0.7 
                
           
           Nine months ended 
          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           September 30,
          2008
           

          Proceeds from new securitizations

           $23.0 $13.3 

          Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

            36.9  40.3 

          Contractual servicing fees received

            0.5  0.5 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

            1.9  2.6 
                

          N/A—Not applicable due to the adoption of SFAS 166/167


          Table of Contents

                  Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the residual interest at the date of sale or securitization of Citi Holding's credit card receivables for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are as follows:


          September 30,
          2009
          September 30,
          2008

          Discount rate

          19.7%17.9%
           
           Nine months ended September 30, 
          In billions of dollars 2010 2009 

          Proceeds from new securitizations

           $5.5 $23.0 

          Pay down of maturing notes

            (15.8) N/A 

          Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

            N/A  36.9 

          Contractual servicing fees received

            N/A  0.5 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

            N/A  1.9 
                

          N/A—Not applicable due to 20.9%

          Constant prepayment rate

          6.0% to 10.7%6.4% to 12.4%

          Anticipated net credit losses

          13.1% to 13.2%6.8% to 8.3%

                  The constant prepayment rate assumption range reflects the projected payment rates over the lifeadoption of a credit card balance, excluding new card purchases. This results in a high payment in the early life of the securitized balances followed by a much lower payment rate, which is depicted in the disclosed range.SFAS 166/167

                  The effect of two negative changes in each of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of retained interests is required to be disclosed. The negative effect of each change must be calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not in fact be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.

                  At September 30, 2009, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:


          September 30, 2009

          Discount rate

          19.7%

          Constant prepayment rate

          6.0% to 10.6%

          Anticipated net credit losses

          13.2%

          Weighted average life

          11.7 months


          In millions of dollars Residual
          interest
           Retained
          certificates
           Other
          retained
          interests
           

          Carrying value of retained interests

           $628 $9,398 $1,926 
                  

          Discount rates

                    
           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(31)$(14)$(6)
           

          Adverse change of 20%

            (61) (29) (12)

          Constant prepayment rate

                    
           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(33)$ $ 
           

          Adverse change of 20%

            (63)    

          Anticipated net credit losses

                    
           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(353)$ $(41)
           

          Adverse change of 20%

            (628)   (83)
                  

          Managed Loans—Citi Holdings

                  After securitization of credit card receivables, the Company continues to maintain credit card customer account relationships and provides servicing for receivables transferred to the trusts. As a result, the Company considers the securitized credit card receivables to be part of the business it manages.

                  Managed-basis (Managed) presentations are non-GAAP financial measures. Managed presentations include results from both the on-balance sheet loans and off-balance sheet loans, and exclude the impact of card securitization activity. Managed presentations assume that securitized loans have not been sold and present the results of the securitized loans in the same manner as Citigroup's owned loans. Citigroup's management believes that Managed presentations provide a greater understanding of ongoing operations and enhance comparability of those results in prior periods as well as demonstrating the effects of unusual gains and charges in the current period. Management further believes that a meaningful analysis of the Company's financial performance requires an understanding of the factors underlying that performance and that investors find it useful to see these non-GAAP financial measures to analyze financial performance without the impact of unusual items that may obscure trends in Citigroup's underlying performance.

                  The following tables present a reconciliation between the Managed basis and on-balance sheeton-balance-sheet credit card portfolios and the related delinquencies (loans which are 90 days or more past due) and credit losses, net of recoveries.

          In millions of dollars, except loans in billions September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
            September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           

          Loan amounts, at period end

            

          On balance sheet

           $21.7 $30.1  $52.7 $27.0 

          Securitized amounts

           36.5 36.3   38.8 
                    

          Total managed loans

           $58.2 $66.4  $52.7 $65.8 
                    

          Delinquencies, at period end

            

          On balance sheet

           $885 $1,017  $1,684 $1,250 

          Securitized amounts

           1,219 1,113   1,326 
                    

          Total managed delinquencies

           $2,104 $2,130  $1,684 $2,576 
                    

           

          Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the
          three months ended September 30,
           2009 2008  2010 2009 

          On balance sheet

           $867 $646  $1,654 $867 

          Securitized amounts

           1,137 812   1,137 
                    

          Total managed

           $2,004 $1,458 

          Total managed credit losses

           $1,654 $2,004 
                    

           

          Credit losses, net of recoveries, for the
          nine months ended September 30,
           2009 2008  2010 2009 

          On balance sheet

           $2,640 $1,694  $5,731 $2,640 

          Securitized amounts

           3,472 2,248   3,472 
                    

          Total managed

           $6,112 $3,942 

          Total managed credit losses

           $5,731 $6,112 
                    

          Funding, Liquidity Facilities and Subordinated Interests

                  Citigroup securitizes credit card receivables through three securitization trusts—trustsCitibank Credit Card Master Trust ("Master Trust"), which is part of Citicorp, and the Citibank OMNI Master Trust ("Omni Trust") and Broadway Credit Card Trust ("Broadway Trust"), prior to its sale in September 2010, which are part of Citi Holdings.

                  Master Trust issues fixedfixed- and floating-rate term notes as well as commercial paper. Some of the term notes are issued to multi-seller commercial paper conduits. In the first half of 2009, the Master Trust has issued $4.3 billion of notes that are eligible for the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (TALF) program, where investors can borrow from the Federal Reserve using the trust securities as collateral. The


          Table of Contents

          weighted average maturity of the term notes issued by the Master Trust was 3.73.5 years as of September 30, 20092010 and 3.83.6 years as of December 31, 2008.2009. Beginning in 2010, the liabilities of the trusts are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.


          Table of Contents

          Master Trust liabilities:liabilities (at par value)

          In billions of dollars September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008  September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           

          Term notes issued to multi- seller CP conduits

           $0.5 $1.0  $0.3 $0.8 

          Term notes issued to other third parties

           53.0 56.2 

          Term notes issued to third parties

           42.9 51.2 

          Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates

           5.1 1.2  4.3 5.0 

          Commercial paper

           12.0 11.0  5.0 14.5 
                    

          Total Master Trust liabilities

           $70.6 $69.4 

          Total Master Trust Liabilities

           $52.5 $71.5 
                    

                  BothThe Omni and Broadway Trusts issue fixedTrust issues fixed- and floating-rate term notes, some of which are purchased by multi-seller commercial paper conduits. The Omni Trust also issues commercial paper. From time to time,During 2009, a portion of the Omni Trust commercial paper hashad been purchased by the Federal Reserve's Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF). In addition, some of the multi-seller conduits that hold Omni Trust term notes havehad placed commercial paper with CPFF. No Omni trust liabilities were funded through CPFF as of September 30, 2010. The total amount of Omni Trust liabilities funded directly or indirectly through the CPFF was $5.2 billion at September 30, 2009 and $6.9$2.5 billion at December 31, 2008.2009.

                  In the third quarter of 2009, Omni Trust issued $3.7 billion of term notes that are eligible for the TALF program.        The weighted average maturity of the third partythird-party term notes issued by the Omni Trust was 2.62.0 years as of September 30, 20092010 and 0.52.5 years as of December 31, 2008. The weighted average maturity of the third party term notes issued by the Broadway Trust was 2.4 years as of September 30, 2009 and 3.3 years as of December 31, 2008.2009.

          Omni Trust liabilities:liabilities (at par value)

          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
            September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           

          Term notes issued to multi- seller CP conduits

           $12.3 $17.8 

          Term notes issued to other third parties

           8.3 2.3 

          Term notes issued to multi- seller commercial paper conduits

           $7.2 $13.1 

          Term notes issued to third parties

           9.2 9.2 

          Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates

           9.2 5.1  7.1 9.8 

          Commercial paper

           4.4 8.5   4.4 
                    

          Total Omni Trust liabilities

           $34.2 $33.7  $23.5 $36.5 
                    

          Broadway Trust liabilities:

          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
           

          Term notes issued to multi- seller CP conduits

           $0.5 $0.4 

          Term notes issued to other third parties

            1.0  1.0 

          Term notes retained by Citigroup affiliates

            0.3  0.3 
                

          Total Broadway Trust liabilities

           $1.8 $1.7 
                

          Table of Contents

                  Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. is the sole provider of full liquidity facilities to the commercial paper programs of the Master and Omni Trusts. Both of these facilities, which represent contractual obligations on the part of Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. to provide liquidity for the issued commercial paper, are made available on market terms to each of the trusts. The liquidity facilities require Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. to purchase the commercial paper issued by each trust at maturity, if the commercial paper does not roll over, as long as there are available credit enhancements outstanding, typically in the form of subordinated notes. As there was no Omni trust commercial paper outstanding as of September 30, 2010, there was no liquidity commitment at that time. The liquidity commitment related to the Omni Trust commercial paper programs amounted to $4.4 billion at September 30, 2009 and $8.5 billion at December 31, 2008.2009. The liquidity commitment related to the Master Trust commercial paper program amounted to $12$5.0 billion at September 30, 20092010 and $11$14.5 billion at December 31, 2008.2009. As of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, none of the Master Trust or Omni Trust liquidity commitments werecommitment was drawn.

                  In addition, Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. provideshad provided liquidity to a third-party, non-consolidated multi-seller commercial paper conduit, which is not a VIE. The commercial paper conduit hashad acquired notes issued by the Omni Trust. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. provides the liquidity facility on market terms. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. will be required to act in its capacity as liquidity provider as long as there are available credit enhancements outstanding and if: (1) the conduit is unable to roll over its maturing commercial paper; or (2) Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. loses its A-1/P-1 credit rating. The liquidity commitment to the third-party conduit was $5.2 billion at September 30, 2009 and $4$2.5 billion at December 31, 2008. As2009, of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008,which none of this liquidity commitment was drawn.

                  All        During 2009, all three of Citigroup's primary credit card securitization trusts have trusts—Master Trust, Omni Trust, and Broadway Trust—had bonds placed on ratings watch with negative implications by rating agencies during the first, second and third quarters of 2009.agencies. As a result of the ratings watch status, certain actions were taken by Citi with respect to each of the trusts. In general, the actions subordinated certain senior interests in the trust assets that were retained by Citigroup,Citi, which effectively placed these interests below investor interests in terms of priority of payment. With

                  As a result of these actions, based on the applicable regulatory capital rules, Citigroup began including the sold assets for all three of the credit card securitization trusts in its risk-weighted assets for purposes of calculating its risk-based capital ratios during 2009. The increase in risk-weighted assets occurred in the quarter during 2009 in which the respective actions took place. The effect of these changes increased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by approximately $82 billion, and decreased Citigroup's Tier 1 Capital ratio by approximately 100 basis points each as of March 31, 2009, with respect to the Master Trust, in the first quarterand Omni Trusts. The inclusion of 2009, Citigroup subordinated a portion of its "seller's interest", which represents a senior interest in Trust receivables, thus making those cash flows available to pay investor coupon each month. In addition, during the second quarter of 2009, a subordinated note with a $3 billion principal amount was issued by the Master Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The note is classified as held-to-maturity investment securities as Citigroup has the intent and ability to hold the security until its maturity. With respect to the Omni Trust, in the second quarter of 2009, subordinated notes with a principal amount of $2 billion were issued by the Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The notes are classified asTrading account assets. These notes are in addition to a $265 million subordinated note issued by Omni Trust and retained by Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. in the fourth quarter of 2008 for the purpose of providing additional credit support for senior noteholders. With respect to the Broadway Trust subordinated notes with a principal amountincreased Citigroup's risk-weighted assets by an additional approximately $900 million at June 30, 2009. With the consolidation of $82 million were issuedthe trusts, beginning in 2010 the credit card receivables that had previously been considered sold under SFAS 140 are now included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and accordingly these assets continue to be included in Citigroup's risk-weighted assets. All bond ratings for each of the trusts have been affirmed by the Trustrating agencies and retained by Citibank, N.A., in order to provide additional credit support for the senior note classes. The notes are classifiedno downgrades have occurred asTrading account assets. of September 30, 2010.


          Table of Contents

          Mortgage Securitizations

                  The Company provides a wide range of mortgage loan products to a diverse customer base. In connection with the securitization of these loans, the Company's U.S. Consumer mortgage business retains the servicing rights, which entitle the Company to a future stream of cash flows based on the outstanding principal balances of the loans and the contractual servicing fee. Failure to service the loans in accordance with contractual requirements may lead to a termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing fees. In non-recourse servicing, the principal credit risk to the Company is the cost of temporary advances of funds. In recourse servicing, the servicer agrees to share credit risk with the owner of the mortgage loans, such as FNMA or FHLMC, or with a private investor, insurer or guarantor. Losses on recourse servicing occur primarily when foreclosure sale proceeds of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance and accrued interest of the loan and the cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property.

                  The Company's mortgage loan securitizations are primarily non-recourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchasers of the securities issued by the trust. Securities and Banking and Special Asset Pool retains servicing for a limited number of its mortgage securitizations.

                  The Company's Consumer business provides a wide range of mortgage loan products to its customers. Once originated, the Company often securitizes these originated and/or purchased loans through the use of SPEs, which prior to 2010 were QSPEs. These QSPEsSPEs are funded through the issuance of Trust Certificates backed solely by the transferred assets. These certificates have the same average life as the transferred assets. In addition to providing a source of liquidity and less expensive funding, securitizing these assets also reduces the Company's credit exposure to the borrowers. These mortgage loan securitizations are primarily non-recourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future credit losses to the purchasers of the securities issued by the trust. However, while the CompanyCompany's Consumer business generally retains the servicing rights and in certain instances retains investment securities, interest-only strips and residual interests in future cash flows from the trusts.trusts, Consumer also services a limited number ofSecurities and Banking's and theSpecial Asset Pool's mortgage securitizations.

                  Consumer securitizes mortgage loans generally through either a government-sponsored agency, such as Ginnie Mae, FNMA or Freddie Mac (U.S. agency—sponsored mortgages), or private label (Non-agency-sponsored mortgages) securitization. The Company is not the primary beneficiary of its U.S. agency-sponsored mortgage securitizations, because Citigroup does not have the power to direct the activities of the SPE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance. Therefore, Citi does not consolidate these U.S. agency-sponsored mortgage securitizations.Securities and Banking andSpecial Asset Pool securitize mortgage loans only through non-agency-sponsored securitization. In certain instances, the Company has (1) the power to direct the activities and (2) the obligation to either absorb losses or right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to its non-agency-sponsored mortgage securitizations and, therefore, is the primary beneficiary and consolidates the SPE.

          Mortgage Securitizations—SecuritizationsCiticorp

                  The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to mortgage securitizations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:

           Three months ended September 30, 

           Three months ended
          September 30, 2009
           Three months ended
          September 30, 2008
            2010 2009 
          In billions of dollars U.S. agency
          sponsoredp
          mortgages
           Non-agency
          sponsored
          mortgages
           Agency and non-agency
          sponsored mortgages
            U.S. agency-
          sponsored
          mortgages
           Non-agency-
          sponsored
          mortgages(1)
           Agency- and non-agency-
          sponsored
          mortgages
           

          Proceeds from new securitizations

           $3.5 $1.5 $0.7  $16.8 $0.8 $5.0 

          Contractual servicing fees received

               0.1   

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

               0.1   
                        

           

           Nine months ended September 30, 

           Nine months ended
          September 30, 2009
           Nine months ended
          September 30, 2008
            2010 2009 
          In billions of dollars U.S. agency
          sponsoredp
          mortgages
           Non-agency
          sponsored
          mortgages
           Agency and non-agency
          sponsored mortgages
            U.S. agency-
          sponsored
          mortgages
           Non-agency-
          sponsored
          mortgages(1)
           Agency- and non-agency-
          sponsored
          mortgages
           

          Proceeds from new securitizations

           $8.8 $3.2 $5.9  $40.0 $1.9 $12.0 

          Contractual servicing fees received

               0.4   

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

             0.2  0.1   
                        

          (1)
          IncludesSecurities and Banking mortgage securitizations.

                  Gains (losses) recognized on the securitization of agency sponsored mortgage activity during the third quarter of 2009 were $4 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, gains (losses) recognized on the securitization of agency and non-agency sponsoredU.S. agency-sponsored mortgages were ($2)$(4) million and $21$(1) million respectively.

                  Agency and non-agency securitization gains (losses) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20082010, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, losses recognized on the securitization of non-agency-sponsored mortgages were $1$(1) million and ($14)$(2) million, respectively.


          Table of Contents        Agency and non-agency mortgage securitization gains for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $4 million and $19 million, respectively.

                  Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization of mortgage receivables for the three months ended September 30, 20092010 and 20082009 are as follows:

           
           Three months ended September 30, 20092010 Three months ended September 30, 20082009
           
           U.S. agencyagency-
          sponsored
          mortgages
           Non-agencyNon-agency-
          sponsored mortgages
          mortgages(1)
           AgencyAgency- and non-agencynon-agency-
          sponsored mortgages

          Discount rate

           2.6% to 43.3%35.7% 0.4%0.8% to 46.8%44.9% 4.6%0.4% to 53.8%46.8%

          Constant prepayment rate

           1.2%2.7% to 45.6%26.0% 4.0%1.5% to 31.3%49.5% 2.0%1.2% to 23.2%45.6%

          Anticipated net credit losses

           NM 6.0%13.0% to 70.0%80.0% 25.0%6.0% to 80.0%70.0%

          (1)
          IncludesSecurities and Banking mortgage securitizations.

          NM Not meaningful.    Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.


          Table of Contents

                  The range in the key assumptions for retained interests in Securities and Banking is due to the different characteristics of the interests retained by the Company. The interests retained by Securities and Banking and Special Asset Pool range from highly rated and/or senior in the capital structure to unrated and/or residual interests.

                  The effect of adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below. The negative effect of each change is calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not in fact be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.

                  At September 30, 2009,2010, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:

           
           September 30, 20092010
           
           U.S. agencyagency-
          sponsored
          mortgages
           Non-agencyNon-agency-
          sponsored mortgages
          mortgages(1)

          Discount rate

           2.6% to 43.3%35.7% 0.4%0.8% to 46.8%44.9%

          Constant prepayment rate

           1.2%2.7% to 45.6%26.0% 4.0%1.5% to 31.3%49.5%

          Anticipated net credit losses

           NANM 6.0%13.0% to 70.0%80.0%


          (1)
          IncludesSecurities and Banking mortgage securitizations.


          NM
          Not meaningful. Anticipated net credit losses are not meaningful due to U.S. agency guarantees.

          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars U.S. agency
          sponsored mortgages
           Non-agency
          sponsored mortgages
           In millions of dollars U.S. agency-
          sponsored
          mortgages
           Non-agency-
          sponsored
          mortgages(1)
           

          Carrying value of retained interests

          Carrying value of retained interests

           $396 $655 

          Carrying value of retained interests

           $2,752 $773 
                     

          Discount rates

          Discount rates

           

          Discount rates

           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(8)$(17)

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(73)$(34)

          Adverse change of 20%

           (15) (33)

          Adverse change of 20%

           (142) (65)
               

          Constant prepayment rate

          Constant prepayment rate

           

          Constant prepayment rate

           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(121)$(17)

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(2)$(4)

          Adverse change of 20%

           (235) (34)

          Adverse change of 20%

           (4) (8)      

          Anticipated net credit losses

          Anticipated net credit losses

           

          Anticipated net credit losses

           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $ $(32)

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(6)$(21)

          Adverse change of 20%

            (58)

          Adverse change of 20%

           (12) (37)
                     

          Table of Contents

          Mortgage Securitizations—Citi Holdings

                  The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to Citi Holdings mortgage securitizations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:

           Three months ended September 30, 

           Three months ended September 30, 2009 Three months ended September 30, 2008  2010 2009 
          In billions of dollars U.S. agency
          sponsored mortgages
           Non-agency
          sponsored mortgages
           Agency and non-agency
          sponsored mortgages
            U.S. agency-
          sponsored
          mortgages
           Non-agency-
          sponsored
          mortgages(1)
           Agency- and Non-agency-
          sponsored mortgages
           

          Proceeds from new securitizations

           $15.9 $ $19.1  $0.6 $ $15.9 

          Contractual servicing fees received

           0.3  0.4  0.2  0.3 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

           0.1  0.2    0.1 
                        

           

           Nine months ended September 30, 

           Nine months ended September 30, 2009 Nine months ended September 30, 2008  2010 2009 
          In billions of dollars U.S. agency
          sponsored mortgages
           Non-agency
          sponsored mortgages
           Agency and non-agency
          sponsored mortgages
            U.S. agency-
          sponsored
          mortgages
           Non-agency-
          sponsored
          mortgages(1)
           Agency- and Non-agency-
          sponsored Mortgages
           

          Proceeds from new securitizations

           $61.0 $ $65.5  $0.6 $ $61.0 

          Contractual servicing fees received

           1.0  1.1  0.6 0.1 1.0 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

           0.3 0.1 0.6  0.1  0.4 
                        

          (1)
          IncludesSecurities and Banking mortgage securitizations.

          Table of Contents

                  The Company did not recognize gains (losses) on the securitization of U.S. agencyagency- and non-agency sponsorednon-agency-sponsored mortgages in the third quarter of 2009, as well as thethree and nine months ended September 30, 2009. There were gains (losses) from the securitization of agency2010 and non-agency sponsored mortgages of ($81) million and ($4) million in the third quarter of 2008 and the nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.2009.

                  Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization of mortgage receivables for the three months ended September 30, 20092010 and 20082009 are as follows:

           
           Three months ended September 30, 2009

          2010 Three months ended September 30,20082009
           
           U.S. agencyagency-
          sponsored
          mortgages
           Non-agencyNon-agency-
          sponsored mortgages
          mortgages(1)
           AgencyAgency- and non-agencyNon-agency-
          sponsored mortgages

          Discount rate

           11.7% to 12.0%N/A NAN/A 10.8%11.7% to 15.3%12.0%

          Constant prepayment rate

           3.7% to 4.2%N/A NAN/A 4.7%3.7% to 8.0%4.2%

          Anticipated net credit losses

           N/A NAN/A 
                 

          (1)
          IncludesSecurities and Banking mortgage securitizations.

          N/A
          Not applicable

          Table of Contents

                  The range in the key assumptions for the retained interests in Special Asset Pool is due to the different characteristics of the interests retained by the Company. The interests retained by Securities and Banking range from highly rated and/or senior in the capital structure to unrated and/or residual interests.

                  The effect of adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below. The negative effect of each change is calculated independently, holding all other assumptions constant. Because the key assumptions may not in fact be independent, the net effect of simultaneous adverse changes in the key assumptions may be less than the sum of the individual effects shown below.

                  At September 30, 2009,2010, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions wereare as follows:

           
           September 30, 20092010
           
           U.S. agencyagency-
          sponsored
          mortgages
           Non-agencyNon-agency-
          sponsored mortgages
          Mortgages(1)

          Discount rate

           13.1%12.8% 0.4%7.3% to 41.3%36.2%

          Constant prepayment rate

           14.4%25.0% 4.0%2.0% to 33.6%35.4%

          Anticipated net credit losses

           0.1% 0.3%0.2% to 70.0%76.1%

          Weighted average life

           6.04.9 years 0.1 to 7.84.0 years

           

          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars U.S. agency
          sponsored mortgages
           Non-agency
          sponsored mortgages
           In millions of dollars U.S. agency-
          sponsored
          mortgages
           Non-agency-
          sponsored
          mortgages(1)
           

          Carrying value of retained interests

          Carrying value of retained interests

           $6,037 $1,011 

          Carrying value of retained interests

           $2,157 $450 
                     

          Discount rates

          Discount rates

           

          Discount rates

           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(201)$(41)

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(74)$(16)

          Adverse change of 20%

           (388) (79)

          Adverse change of 20%

           (143) (31)
               

          Constant prepayment rate

          Constant prepayment rate

           

          Constant prepayment rate

           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(155)$(42)

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(361)$(51)

          Adverse change of 20%

           (297) (81)

          Adverse change of 20%

           (693) (96)      

          Anticipated net credit losses

          Anticipated net credit losses

           

          Anticipated net credit losses

           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(19)$(44)

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(23)$(24)

          Adverse change of 20%

           (37) (86)

          Adverse change of 20%

           (46) (49)
                     

          (1)
          IncludesSecurities and Banking mortgage securitization.

          Mortgage Servicing Rights

                  In connection with the securitization of mortgage loans, the Company's U.S. Consumer mortgage business retains the servicing rights, which entitle the Company to a future stream of cash flows based on the outstanding principal balances of the loans and the contractual servicing fee. Failure to service the loans in accordance with contractual requirements may lead to a termination of the servicing rights and the loss of future servicing fees.

                  The fair value of capitalized mortgage loan servicing rights (MSR)(MSRs) was $6.2$4.0 billion and $8.3$6.2 billion at September 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, respectively. The MSRs correspond to principal loan balances of $577$503 billion and $648$577 billion as of September 30, 20092010 and 2008,2009, respectively. The following table summarizes the changes in capitalized MSRs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:


           Three Months Ended September 30,  Three months ended
          September 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008  2010 2009 

          Balance, at June 30

           $6,770 $8,934 

          Balance, as of June 30

           $4,894 $6,770 

          Originations

           267 297  155 267 

          Purchases

             

          Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions

           (490) (595) (635) (490)

          Transfer toTrading account assets

             

          Other changes(1)

           (319) (290) (438) (319)
                    

          Balance, at September 30

           $6,228 $8,346 

          Balance, as of September 30

           $3,976 $6,228 
                    

           


           Nine Months Ended September 30,  Nine months ended
          September 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008  2010 2009 

          Balance, beginning of period

           $5,657 $8,380 

          Balance, as of the beginning of year

           $6,530 $5,657 

          Originations

           893 1,066  424 893 

          Purchases

            1 

          Changes in fair value of MSRs due to changes in inputs and assumptions

           1,027 (90) (1,929) 1,027 

          Transfer toTrading account assets

            (163)

          Other changes(1)

           (1,349) (848) (1,049) (1,349)
                    

          Balance, end of period

           $6,228 $8,346 

          Balance, as of September 30

           $3,976 $6,228 
                    

          (1)
          Represents changes due to customer payments and passage of time.

                  The market for MSRs is not sufficiently liquid to provide participants with quoted market prices. Therefore, the Company uses an option-adjusted spread valuation approach to determine the fair value of MSRs. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted discount rates. The key assumptions used in the valuation of MSRs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount


          Table of Contents

          rates. The model assumptions and the MSRs' fair value estimates are compared to observable trades of similar MSR portfolios and interest-only security portfolios, as available, as well as to MSR broker valuations and industry surveys. The cash flow model and underlying prepayment and interest rate models used to value these MSRs are subject to validation in accordance with the Company's model validation policies.

                  The fair value of the MSRs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. In managing this risk, the Company economically hedges a significant portion of the value of its MSRs through the use of interest rate derivative contracts, forward purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities and purchased securities classified as trading.


          Table of Contents

                  The Company receives fees during the course of servicing previously securitized mortgages. The amountamounts of these fees for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20092010 and 20082009 were as follows:


           Three months ended, Nine months ended,  Three months ended
          September 30,
           Nine months ended
          September 30,
           
          In millions of dollars 2009 2008 2009 2008  2010 2009 2010 2009 

          Servicing fees

           $397 $429 $1,255 $1,261  $336 $397 $1,049 $1,255 

          Late fees

           23 25 71 75  22 23 67 71 

          Ancillary fees

           18 16 60 50  53 18 145 60 
                            

          Total MSR fees

           $438 $470 $1,386 $1,386  $411 $438 $1,261 $1,386 
                            

                  These fees are classified in the Consolidated Statement of Income asCommissions and fees.

          Re-securitizations

                  The Company engages in re-securitization transactions in which debt securities are transferred to a VIE in exchange for new beneficial interests. During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, Citi transferred non-agency (private-label) securities with principal of approximately $3,559 million and $4,642 million, respectively, to re-securitization entities. These securities are backed by either residential or commercial mortgages and are often structured on behalf of clients. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, Citi recognized losses on the sale of securities to private-label re-securitization entities of approximately $117 million and $118 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2010, the market value of Citi owned interests in non-agency re-securitization transactions structured by Citi totaled approximately $421 million and are recorded in trading assets. Of this amount, approximately $257 million and $163 million relate to senior and subordinated beneficial interests, respectively.

                  The Company also re-securitizes U.S. government-agency guaranteed mortgage-backed (Agency) securities. For the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2010, Citi transferred Agency securities with principal of approximately $5,897 million and $18,579 million, respectively, to re-securitization entities. As of September 30, 2010, the market value of Citi owned interests in Agency re-securitization transactions structured by Citi totaled approximately $2,546 million and are recorded in trading assets.

                  As of September 30, 2010, the Company did not consolidate any private-label or Agency re-securitization entities.

          Student Loan Securitizations

                  Through        The Company indirectly owns, through Citibank, N.A., 80% of the Company's outstanding common stock of The Student Loan Corporation (SLC), which is part of Citi Holdings—Local Consumer Lending. As further discussed in Note 2, in the third quarter of 2010, Citi announced the sale of SLC. As part of the transaction, Citi has agreed to sell its residual interests in substantially all of the student loans securitization trusts. These transactions are currently expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2010. At September 30, 2010, approximately $31.4 billion of loans have been transferred to Assets of discontinued operations held for sale.

                  Through this business, within Citi Holdings, the Company maintains programs to securitize certain portfolios of student loan assets. Under these securitization programs, transactions qualifying as sales are off-balance sheet transactions in which the loans are removed from the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and sold to a QSPE. These QSPEsVIEs (some of them being former QSPEs), which are funded through the issuance of pass-through term notes collateralized solely by the trust assets. For

                  The Company has (1) the power to direct the activities of these off-balance sheetVIEs that most significantly impact their economic performance and (2) the obligation to either absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIEs.

                  As a result of the adoption of SFAS 166 and SFAS 167, the Company consolidated all student loan trusts that were formerly QSPEs, as well as newly created securitization VIEs, as the primary beneficiary. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 166 and SFAS 167, the student loan securitizations through QSPEs were accounted for as off-balance-sheet securitizations, with the Company generally retainsretaining interests in the form of subordinated residual interests (i.e., interest-onlyinterest only strips) and servicing rights.

                  Under terms of the trust arrangements, the Company has no obligationsobligation to provide financial support and has not provided such support. A substantial portion of the credit risk associated with the securitized loans has been transferred to third-party guarantors or insurers either under the Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFEL Program), authorized by the U.S. Department of Education under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, or through private credit insurance. On March 30, 2010, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 was signed into law, which eliminated new FFEL Program loan originations. Effective July 1, 2010, in compliance with this regulatory change, SLC ceased originating new FFEL Program loans. This change is not currently anticipated to materially impact the Company's financial statements.

                  The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to student loan securitizations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (three months end September 30, 2010 and 2008:2009 are nil):


          Three months ended
          In billions of dollarsSeptember 30,
          2009
          September 30,
          2008

          Proceeds from new securitizations

          $$

          Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

          Contractual servicing fees received

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows


           
           Nine months ended 
          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           September 30,
          2008
           

          Proceeds from new securitizations

           $ $2.0 

          Proceeds from collections reinvested in new receivables

               

          Contractual servicing fees received

            0.1  0.1 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

            0.1  0.1 
                

                  The Company did not recognize any gains or losses during the third quarters of 2009 and 2008. The company recognized a gain of $1 million during the 9 months ended September 30, 2008.

                  Key assumptions used in measuring the fair value of the residual interest at the date of sale or securitization of Citi Holding's student loan receivables for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, are as follows:


          September 30,
          2009
          September 30,
          2008

          Discount rate

          NA11.1% to 14.1%

          Constant prepayment rate

          NA1.1% to 9.9%

          Anticipated net credit losses

          NA0.3% to 0.9%

                  At September 30, 2009, the key assumptions used to value retained interests and the sensitivity of the fair value to adverse changes of 10% and 20% in each of the key assumptions were as follows:


          Retained interests

          Discount rate

          10.8% to 16.3%

          Constant prepayment rate

          0.2% to 5.2%

          Anticipated net credit losses

          0.3% to 0.7%

          Weighted average life

          4.1 to 10.4 years


          In millions of dollars Retained interests 

          Carrying value of retained interests

           $1,045 

          Discount rates

              
           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(29)
           

          Adverse change of 20%

            (55)

          Constant prepayment rate

              
           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(4)
           

          Adverse change of 20%

            (9)

          Anticipated net credit losses

              
           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(5)
           

          Adverse change of 20%

            (10)
              
           
           Nine months ended
          September 30,
           
          In billions of dollars 2010 2009 

          Contractual servicing fees received

           $ $0.1 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

              0.1 

          Table of Contents

          On-Balance Sheet Securitizations—Citi Holdings

                  The Company engages in on-balance sheet securitizations. These are securitizations that do not qualify for sales treatment; thus, the assets remain on the Company's balance sheet. The following table presents the carrying amounts and classification of consolidated assets and liabilities transferred in transactions from the Consumer credit card, student loan, mortgage and auto businesses, accounted for as secured borrowings:

          In billions of dollars September 30,
          2009
           December 31,
          2008
           

          Cash

           $0.7 $0.3 

          Available-for-sale securities

            0.1  0.1 

          Loans

            21.8  7.5 

          Allowance for loan losses

            (0.2) (0.1)

          Other

            1.0   
                

          Total assets

           $23.4 $7.8 
                

          Long-term debt

           $17.2 $6.3 

          Other liabilities

            3.9  0.3 
                

          Total liabilities

           $21.1 $6.6 
                

                  All assets are restricted from being sold or pledged as collateral. The cash flows from these assets are the only source used to pay down the associated liabilities, which are non-recourse to the Company's general assets.

          Citi-Administered Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Conduits

                  The Company is active in the asset-backed commercial paper conduit business as administrator of several multi-seller commercial paper conduits, and also as a service provider to single-seller and other commercial paper conduits sponsored by third parties.

                  The multi-seller commercial paper conduits are designed to provide the Company's customersclients access to low-cost funding in the commercial paper markets. The conduits purchase assets from or provide financing facilities to customersclients and are funded by issuing commercial paper to third-party investors. The conduits generally do not purchase assets originated by the Company. The funding of the conduit is facilitated by the liquidity support and credit enhancements provided by the Company.

                  As administrator to the conduits, the Company is generally responsible for selecting and structuring assets purchased or financed by the conduits, making decisions regarding the funding of the conduits, including determining the tenor and other features of the commercial paper issued, monitoring the quality and performance of the conduits' assets, and facilitating the operations and cash flows of the conduits. In return, the Company earns structuring fees from customers for individual transactions and earns an administration fee from the conduit, which is equal to the income from client program and liquidity fees of the conduit after payment of interest costs and other fees. This administration fee is fairly stable, since most risks and rewards of the underlying assets are passed back to the customersclients and, once the asset pricing is negotiated, most ongoing income, costs and fees are relatively stable as a percentage of the conduit's size.

                  The conduits administered by the Company do not generally invest in liquid securities that are formally rated by third parties. The assets are privately negotiated and structured transactions that are designed to be held by the conduit, rather than actively traded and sold. The yield earned by the conduit on each asset is generally tied to the rate on the commercial paper issued by the conduit, thus passing interest rate risk to the client. Each asset purchased by the conduit is structured with transaction-specific credit enhancement features provided by the third-party client seller, including over-collateralization,over collateralization, cash and excess spread collateral accounts, direct recourse or third-party guarantees. These credit enhancements are sized with the objective of approximating a credit rating of A or above, based on the Company's internal risk ratings.

                  Substantially all of the funding of the conduits is in the form of short-term commercial paper, with a weighted average life generally ranging from 30-4530 to 60 days. As of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the weighted average lifelives of the commercial paper issued wasby consolidated and unconsolidated conduits were approximately 4757 days and 3743 days, respectively. In addition, the conduits have issued subordinate loss notes and equity with a notional amount of approximately $76 million and varying remaining tenors ranging from 10 month to 6 years.

                  The primary credit enhancement provided to the conduit investors is in the form of transaction-specific credit enhancement described above. In addition, there are generally two additional forms of credit enhancement that protect the commercial paper investors from defaulting assets. First, the subordinate loss notes issued by each conduit absorb any credit losses up to their full notional amount. It is expected that the subordinate loss notes issued by each unconsolidated conduit are sufficient to absorb a majority of the expected losses from each conduit, thereby making the single investor in the subordinate loss note the primary beneficiary. Second, each conduit has obtained a letter of credit from the Company, which is generallyneeds to be sized to at least 8-10% of the conduit's assets. The letters of credit provided by the Company to the consolidated conduits total approximately $3.7 billion and are included in the Company's maximum exposure to loss.$3.4 billion. The net result across all multi-seller conduits administered by the Company is that, in the event defaulted assets exceed the transaction-specific credit enhancement described above, any losses in each conduit are allocated in the following order:

            subordinate loss note holders,

            the Company, and

            the commercial paper investors.

                  The Company also provides the conduits with two forms of liquidity agreements that are used to provide funding to the conduits in the event of a market disruption, among other events. Each asset of the conduit is supported by a transaction-specific liquidity facility in the form of an asset purchase agreement (APA). Under the APA, the Company has agreed to purchase non-defaulted eligible receivables from the conduit at par. Any assets purchased under the APA are subject to increased pricing. The APA is not designed to provide credit support to the conduit, as it generally does not permit the purchase of defaulted or impaired assets and generally reprices


          Table of Contents

          the assets purchased to consider potential increased credit risk. The APA covers all assets in the conduits and is considered in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. In addition, the Company provides the conduits with program-wide liquidity in the form of short-term lending commitments. Under these commitments, the Company has agreed to lend to the conduits in the event of a short-term disruption in the commercial paper market, subject to specified conditions. The total notional exposure under the program-wide liquidity agreement for the Company's unconsolidated administered conduit as of September 30, 2010, is $11.3$0.6 billion and is considered in the Company's maximum exposure to loss. The Company receives fees for providing both types of liquidity agreement and considers these fees to be on fair market terms.

                  Finally, the Company is one of several named dealers in the commercial paper issued by the conduits and earns a market-based fee for providing such services. Along with third-party dealers, the Company makes a market in the commercial paper and may from time to time fund commercial paper pending sale to a third party. On specific dates with less liquidity in the market, the Company may hold in inventory commercial paper issued by conduits administered by the Company, as well as conduits administered by third parties. The amount of commercial paper issued by its administered conduits held in inventory fluctuates based on market conditions and activity. As of September 30, 2009,2010, the Company owned $109 millionnone of the commercial paper issued by its unconsolidated administered conduits.conduit.

                  Upon adoption of SFAS 167 on January 1, 2010, with the exception of the government-guaranteed loan conduit described below, the asset-backed commercial paper conduits were consolidated by the Company. The Company determined that through its role as administrator it had the power to direct the activities that most significantly impacted the entities' economic performance. These powers included


          Table of Contents

          its ability to structure and approve the assets purchased by the conduits, its ongoing surveillance and credit mitigation activities, and its liability management. In addition, as a result of all the Company's involvement described above, it was concluded that the Company had an economic interest that could potentially be significant. However, the assets and liabilities of the Conduits are separate and apart from those of Citigroup. No assets of any Conduit are available to satisfy the creditors of Citigroup or any of its other subsidiaries.

                  The Company administers one conduit that originates loans to third-party borrowers and those obligations are fully guaranteed primarily by AAA-rated government agencies that support export and development financing programs. The economic performance of this government-guaranteed loan conduit is most significantly impacted by the performance of its underlying assets. The guarantors must approve each loan held by the entity and the guarantors have the ability (through establishment of the servicing terms to direct default mitigation and to purchase defaulted loans) to manage the conduit's loans that become delinquent to improve the economic performance of the conduit. Because the Company does not have the power to direct the activities of this government-guaranteed loan conduit that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity, it was concluded that the Company should not consolidate the entity. As of September 30, 2010, this unconsolidated government-guaranteed loan conduit held assets of approximately $7.6 billion.

                  Prior to January 1, 2010, the Company was required to quantitatively analyze the expected variability of theeach conduit quantitatively to determine whether the Company iswas the primary beneficiary of the conduit. The Company performsperformed this analysis on a quarterly basis. For conduits where the subordinate loss notes or third-party guarantees arewere sufficient to absorb a majority of the expected loss of the conduit, the Company doesdid not consolidate. In circumstances where the subordinate loss notes or third-party guarantees arewere insufficient to absorb a majority of the expected loss, the Company consolidatesconsolidated the conduit as its primary beneficiary due to the additional credit enhancement provided by the Company. In conducting this analysis, the Company considersconsidered three primary sources of variability in the conduit: credit risk, interest-rateinterest rate risk and fee variability.

                  The Company models the credit risk of the conduit's assets using a Credit Value at Risk (C-VAR) model. The C-VAR model considers changes in credit spreads (both within a rating class as well as due to rating upgrades and downgrades), name-specific changes in credit spreads, credit defaults and recovery rates and diversification effects of pools of financial assets. The model incorporates data from independent rating agencies as well as the Company's own proprietary information regarding spread changes, ratings transitions and losses given default. Using this credit data, a Monte Carlo simulation is performed to develop a distribution of credit risk for the portfolio of assets owned by each conduit, which is then applied on a probability-weighted basis to determine expected losses due to credit risk. In addition, the Company continuously monitors the specific credit characteristics of the conduit's assets and the current credit environment to confirm that the C-VAR model used continues to incorporate the Company's best information regarding the expected credit risk of the conduit's assets.

                  The Company also analyzes the variability in the fees that it earns from the conduit using monthly actual historical cash flow data to determine average fee and standard deviation measures for each conduit. Because any unhedged interest rate and foreign-currency risk not contractually passed on to customers is absorbed by the fees earned by the Company, the fee variability analysis incorporates those risks.

                  The fee variability and credit risk variability are then combined into a single distribution of the conduit's overall returns. This return distribution is updated and analyzed on at least a quarterly basis to ensure that the amount of the subordinate loss notes issued to third parties is sufficient to absorb greater than 50% of the total expected variability in the conduit's returns. The expected variability absorbed by the subordinate loss note investors is therefore measured to be greater than the expected variability absorbed by the Company through its liquidity arrangements and other fees earned, and the investors in commercial paper and medium-term notes. While the notional amounts of the subordinate loss notes are quantitatively small compared to the size of the conduits, this is reflective of the fact that most of the substantive risks of the conduits are absorbed by the enhancements provided by the sellers (customers) and other third parties that provide transaction-level credit enhancement. Because these risks and related enhancements are generally required to be excluded from the analysis, the remaining risks and expected variability are quantitatively small. The calculation of variability focuses primarily onexpected variability, rather than the risks associated with extreme outcomes (for example, large levels of default) that are expected to occur very infrequently. So while the subordinate loss notes are sized appropriately compared to expected losses, they do not provide significant protection against extreme or unusual credit losses. Where such credit losses occur or become expected to occur, the Company would consolidate the conduit due to the additional credit enhancement provided by the Company.

          Third-Party Commercial Paper Conduits

                  The Company also provides liquidity facilities to single- and multi-seller conduits sponsored by third parties. These conduits are independently owned and managed and invest in a variety of asset classes, depending on the nature of the conduit. The facilities provided by the Company typically represent a small portion of the total liquidity facilities obtained by each conduit, and are collateralized by the assets of each conduit. As of September 30, 2009,2010, the notional amount of these facilities was approximately $903$838 million, and $298of which $288 million was funded under these facilities. The Company is not the party that has the power to direct the activities of these conduits that most significantly impact their economic performance and thus does not consolidate them.

          Collateralized Debt and Loan Obligations

                  A securitized collateralized debt obligation (CDO) is an SPE that purchases a pool of assets consisting of asset-backed securities and synthetic exposures through derivatives on asset-backed securities and issues multiple tranches of equity and notes to investors. A third-party asset manager is typically retained by the CDO to select the pool of assets and manage those assets over the term of the CDO. The Company earns fees for


          Table of Contents

          warehousing assets prior to the creation of a CDO, structuring CDOs and placing debt securities with investors. In addition, the Company has retained interests in many of the CDOs it has structured and makes a market in those issued notes.

                  A cash CDO, or arbitrage CDO, is a CDO designed to take advantage of the difference between the yield on a portfolio of selected assets, typically residential mortgage-backed securities, and the cost of funding the CDO through the sale of notes to investors. "Cash flow" CDOs are vehicles in which the CDO passes on cash flows from a pool of assets, while "market value" CDOs pay to investors the market value of the pool of assets owned by the CDO at maturity. Both types of CDOs are typically managed by a third-party asset manager. In these transactions, all of the equity and notes issued by the CDO are funded, as the cash is needed to purchase the debt securities. In a typical cash CDO, a third-party investment manager selects a portfolio of assets, which the Company funds through a warehouse financing arrangement prior to the creation of the CDO. The Company then sells the debt securities to the CDO in exchange for cash raised through the issuance of notes. The Company's continuing involvement in cash CDOs is typically limited to investing in a portion of the notes or loans issued by the CDO and making a market in those securities, and acting as derivative counterparty for interest rate or foreign currency swaps used in the structuring of the CDO.

                  A synthetic CDO is similar to a cash CDO, except that the CDO obtains exposure to all or a portion of the referenced assets synthetically through derivative instruments, such as credit default swaps. Because the CDO does not need to raise cash sufficient to purchase the entire referenced portfolio, a substantial portion of the senior tranches of risk is typically passed on to CDO investors in the form of unfunded liabilities or derivative instruments. Thus, the CDO writes credit protection on select referenced debt securities to the Company or third parties and the risk is then passed on to the CDO investors in the form of funded notes or purchased credit protection through derivative instruments. Any cash raised from investors is invested in a portfolio of collateral securities or investment contracts. The collateral is then used to support the CDO's obligations of the CDO on the credit default swaps written to counterparties. The Company's continuing involvement in synthetic CDOs generally includes purchasing credit protection through credit default swaps with the CDO, owning a portion of the capital structure of the CDO in the form of both unfunded derivative positions (primarily super seniorsuper-senior exposures discussed below) and funded notes, entering into interest-rate swap and total-return swap transactions with the CDO, lending to the CDO, and making a market in those funded notes.

                  A securitized collateralized loan obligation (CLO) is substantially similar to the CDO transactions described above, except that the assets owned by the SPE (either cash instruments or synthetic exposures through derivative instruments) are corporate loans and to a lesser extent corporate bonds, rather than asset-backed debt securities.

                  Where a CDO vehicle issues preferred shares, the preferred shares generally represent an insufficient amount of equity


          Table of Contents

          (less than 10%) and create the presumption that the preferred shares are insufficient to finance the entity's activities without subordinated financial support. In addition, although the preferred shareholders generally have full exposure to expected losses on the collateral and uncapped potential to receive expected residual rewards, it is not always clear whether they have the ability to make decisions about the entity that have a significant effect on the entity's financial results because of their limited role in making day-to-day decisions and their limited ability to remove the third-party asset manager. Because one or both of the above conditions will generally be met, we have assumed that, even where a CDO vehicle issued preferred shares, the vehicle should be classified as a VIE.

          Consolidation and subsequent deconsolidation of CDOs

                  Substantially all of the CDOs that the Company is involved with are managed by a third-party asset manager. In general, the third-party asset manager, through its ability to purchase and sell assets or, where the reinvestment period of a CDO has expired, the ability to sell assets, will have the power to direct the activities of the vehicle that most significantly impact the economic performance of the CDO. However, where a CDO has experienced an event of default, the activities of the third-party asset manager may be curtailed and certain additional rights will generally be provided to the investors in a CDO vehicle, including the right to direct the liquidation of the CDO vehicle.

                  The Company has retained significant portions of the "super senior""super-senior" positions issued by certain CDOs. These positions are referred to as "super senior""super-senior" because they represent the most senior positions in the CDO and, at the time of structuring, were senior to tranches rated AAA by independent rating agencies. These positions include facilities structured in the form of short-term commercial paper, where the Company wrote put options ("liquidity puts") to certain CDOs. Under the terms of the liquidity puts, if the CDO was unable to issue commercial paper at a rate below a specified maximum (generally LIBOR + 35 bps to LIBOR + 40 bps), the Company was obligated to fund the senior tranche of the CDO at a specified interest rate. As of September 30, 2009,2010, the Company no longer had purchasedexposure to this commercial paper as all $25 billion of the commercial paper subject to these liquidity puts.underlying CDOs had been liquidated.

                  Since the inception of many CDO transactions, the subordinate tranches of the CDOs have diminished significantly in value and in rating. The declines in value of the subordinate tranches and in the super seniorsuper-senior tranches indicate that the super seniorsuper-senior tranches are now exposed to a significant portion of the expected losses of the CDOs, based on current market assumptions.

                  The Company evaluatesdoes not generally have the power to direct the activities of the vehicle that most significantly impact the economic performance of the CDOs as this power is held by the third-party asset manager of the CDO. As such, certain synthetic and cash CDOs that were consolidated under ASC 810, were deconsolidated upon the adoption of SFAS 167. The deconsolidation of certain synthetic CDOs resulted in the recognition of current receivables and payables related to purchased and written credit default swaps entered into by Citigroup with the CDOs, which had previously been eliminated upon consolidation of these transactionsvehicles.

                  Where: (i) an event of default has occurred for consolidation when reconsideration events occur.

                  Upon a reconsideration event,CDO vehicle, (ii) the Company has the unilateral ability to remove the third-party asset manager without cause or liquidate the CDO, and (iii) the Company has exposure to the vehicle that is potentially significant to the vehicle, the Company will consolidate the CDO. In addition, where the Company is at risk for consolidation only ifthe asset manager of the CDO vehicle and has exposure to the vehicle that is potentially significant, the Company owns a majoritywill generally consolidate the CDO.

                  The net impact of either a single tranche or a groupadopting SFAS 167 for CDOs was an increase in the Company's assets of tranches that absorb the remaining risk$1.9 billion and liabilities of the CDO. Due to reconsideration events during 2007 and 2008, the Company has consolidated 30$1.9 billion as of the 46 CDOs/CLOs in which the Company holds a majority of the senior interests of the transaction.

          January 1, 2010. The Company continues to monitor its involvement in unconsolidated VIEs and ifCDOs. If the Company were to acquire additional interests in these vehicles, be provided the right to direct the activities of a CDO (if the Company obtains the unilateral ability to remove the third-party asset manager without cause or liquidate the CDO), or if the CDOs' contractual arrangements were to be changed to reallocate expected losses or residual returns among the various interest holders, the Company may be required to consolidate the CDOs. For cash CDOs, the net result of such consolidation would be to gross up the Company's balance sheet by the current fair value of the subordinate securities held by third parties, whichwhose amounts are not considered material. For synthetic CDOs, the net result of such consolidation may reduce the Company's balance sheet by eliminating intercompany derivative receivables and payables in consolidation.


          Table of Contents

          Cash FlowsKey Assumptions and Retained Interests—Citi Holdings

                  The following tables summarize selected cash flow information related to CDO and CLO securitizations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009:


          Three months ended
          September 30, 2009
          In billions of dollarsCDOsCLOs

          Cash flows received on retained interests



          Nine months ended
          September 30, 2009
          In billions of dollarsCDOsCLOs

          Cash flows received on retained interests

                  The key assumptions, used for the securitization of CDOs and CLOs during the three monthsquarter ended September 30, 2009,2010, in measuring the fair value of retained interests at the date of sale or securitization are as follows:

           
           CDOs CLOs

          Discount rate

           36.4%14.7% to 39.7%16.2% 5.7%4.9% to 6.3%5.4%

                  The effect of two negative changes in discount rates used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below.

          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars CDOs CLOs In millions of dollars CDOs CLOs 

          Carrying value of retained interests

          Carrying value of retained interests

           $251 $709 

          Carrying value of retained interests

           $51 $661 
               

          Discount rates

          Discount rates

           

          Discount rates

           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(24)$(11)

          Adverse change of 10%

           $(5)$(8)

          Adverse change of 20%

           (47) (23)

          Adverse change of 20%

           (11) (17)
                     

          Asset-Based Financing—CiticorpFinancing

                  The Company provides loans and other forms of financing to VIEs that hold assets. Those loans are subject to the same credit approvals as all other loans originated or purchased by the Company. Financings in the form of debt securities or derivatives are, in most circumstances, reported inTrading account assets and accounted for at fair value through earnings. The Company does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact these VIEs' economic performance and thus it does not consolidate them.


          Table of Contents

          Asset-Based Financing—Citicorp

                  The primary types of Citicorp's asset-based financing, total assets of the unconsolidated VIEs with significant involvement and the Company's maximum exposure to loss at September 30, 20092010 are shown below. For the Company to realize that maximum loss, the VIE (borrower) would have to default with no recovery from the assets held by the VIE.

          In billions of dollars
          Type
           Total
          assets
           Maximum
          exposure
           
          In billions of dollars Total
          assets
           Maximum
          exposure
           

          Type

           

          Commercial and other real estate

           $0.6 $  $0.6 $0.1 

          Hedge funds and equities

           5.8 3.1  8.6 3.7 

          Airplanes, ships and other assets

           11.9 2.1  7.6 3.7 
                    

          Total

           $18.3 $5.2  $16.8 $7.5 
                    

          Asset-Based Financing—Citi Holdings

                  The Company provides loans and other forms of financing to VIEs that hold assets. Those loans are subject to the same credit approvals as all other loans originated or purchased by the Company. Financings in the form of debt securities or derivatives are, in most circumstances, reported inTrading account assets and accounted for at fair value through earnings.

                  The primary types of Citi Holdings' asset-based financing, total assets of the unconsolidated VIEs with significant involvement and the Company's maximum exposure to loss at September 30, 20092010 are shown below. For the Company to realize that maximum loss, the VIE (borrower) would have to default with no recovery from the assets held by the VIE.

          In billions of dollars
          Type
           Total
          assets
           Maximum
          exposure
           
          In billions of dollars Total
          assets
           Maximum
          exposure
           

          Type

           

          Commercial and other real estate

           $36.9 $7.0  $29.0 $5.2 

          Hedge funds and equities

           2.2 0.8 

          Corporate loans

           7.9 6.7  7.6 6.4 

          Airplanes, ships and other assets

           6.0 3.4  4.6 2.2 
                    

          Total

           $53.0 $17.9  $41.2 $13.8 
                    

                  The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to asset-based financing for the three and nine months ended September 30, 20092010 and 2008:2009:


           Three months ended
          September 30,
            Three months ended
          September 30,
           
          In billions of dollars 2009 2008  2010 2009 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

           $0.4 $  $0.2 $0.1 
                    

           


           Nine months ended
          September 30,
            Nine months ended
          September 30,
           
          In billions of dollars 2009 2008  2010 2009 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

           $2.4 $  $1.2 $2.0 
                    

                  The effect of two negative changes in discount rates used to determine the fair value of retained interests is disclosed below.

          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars Asset based financing In millions of dollars Asset-based
          financing
           

          Carrying value of retained interests

          Carrying value of retained interests

           $6,882 

          Carrying value of retained interests

           $6,441 

          Value of underlying portfolio

          Value of underlying portfolio

           

          Value of underlying portfolio

           

          Adverse change of 10%

           $ 

          Adverse change of 10%

           $ 

          Adverse change of 20%

           (436)

          Adverse change of 20%

           (221)
                 

          Table of Contents

          Municipal Securities Tender Option Bond (TOB) Trusts

                  The Company sponsors TOB trusts that hold fixed- and floating-rate, tax-exempt securities issued by state or local municipalities. The trusts are typically single-issuer trusts whose assets are purchased from the Company and from the secondary market. The trusts issueare referred to as Tender Option Bond trusts because the senior interest holders have the ability to tender their interests periodically back to the issuing trust, as described further below.

                  The TOB trusts fund the purchase of their assets by issuing long-term senior floating rate notes (Floaters) and junior residual securities (Residuals). The Floaters and the Residuals have a long-term rating based ontenor equal to the long-term ratingmaturity of the trust, which is equal to or shorter than the tenor of the underlying municipal bondbond. Residuals are frequently less than 1% of a trust's total funding and a short-term rating based on that ofentitle their holder to the liquidity provider toresidual cash flows from the issuing trust. The Residuals are generally rated based on the long-term rating of the underlying municipal bond and entitle the holder to the residual cash flows from the issuing trust.

          bond. The Company sponsors three kinds of TOB trusts: customer TOB trusts, proprietary TOB trusts and QSPE TOB trusts.

            Customer TOB trusts are trusts through which customers finance investments in municipal securities and are not consolidated by the Company. Proprietary and QSPE TOB trusts, on the other hand, provide the Company with the ability to finance its own investments in municipal securities.

            Proprietary TOB trusts are generally consolidated, in which case the financing (the Floaters) is recognized on the Company's balance sheet as a liability. However, certain proprietary TOB trusts are not consolidated by the Company, where the Residuals are held by hedge funds that are consolidated and managed by the Company. The assets and the associated liabilities of these TOB trusts are not consolidated by the hedge funds (and, thus, are not consolidated by the Company) under the application of ASC 946,Financial Services—Investment Companies, which precludes consolidation of owned investments. The Company consolidates the hedge funds, because the Company holds controlling financial interests in the hedge funds. Certain of the Company's equity investments in the hedge funds are hedged with derivatives transactions executed by the Company with third parties referencing the returns of the hedge fund.

            QSPE TOB trusts provide the Company with the same exposure as proprietary TOB trusts and are not consolidated by the Company.

                  Credit rating distribution is based on the external rating of the municipal bonds within the TOB trusts, including any credit enhancement provided by monoline insurance companies or the Company in the primary or secondary markets, as discussed below. The total assets for proprietary TOB Trusts (consolidated and non-consolidated) includes $0.8 billion of assets where the Residuals are held by a hedge fund that is consolidated and managed by the Company.

                  The TOB trusts fund the purchase of their assets by issuing Floaters along with Residuals, which are frequently less than 1% of a trust's total funding. The tenor of the Floaters matches the maturity of the TOB trust and is equal to or shorter than the tenor of the municipal bond held by the trust, and the Floaters bear interest rates that are typically reset weekly to a new market rate (based on the SIFMA index)index: a seven day high grade market index of tax exempt, variable rate municipal bonds). Floater holders have an option to tender thetheir Floaters they hold back to the trust periodically. The Floaters have a long-term rating based on the long-term rating of the underlying municipal bond, including any credit enhancement provided by monoline insurance companies, and a short-term rating based on that of the liquidity provider to the trust.

                  The Company sponsors two kinds of TOB trusts: customer TOB trusts and proprietary TOB trusts. Customer TOB trusts issue the Floaters and Residuals to third parties. Proprietary and QSPE TOBare trusts issue the Floaters to third parties and thethrough which customers finance investments in municipal securities. The Residuals are held by customers, and the Company.

                  Approximately $2.2 billion of the municipal bonds ownedFloaters by third-party investors. Proprietary TOB trusts have an additional credit guarantee provided by the Company. In all other cases, the assets are either unenhanced or are insured with a monoline insurance provider in the primary market or in the secondary market. While the trusts have not encountered any adverse credit events as defined in the underlying trust agreements, certain monoline insurance companies have experienced downgrades. In these cases,through which the Company has proactively managedfinances its own investments in municipal securities. The Company holds the Residuals in proprietary TOB programs by applying additional secondary market insurance on the assets or proceeding with orderly unwinds of the trusts.

                  The Company in its capacityserves as remarketing agent facilitatesto the trusts, facilitating the sale of the Floaters to third parties at inception of the trust and facilitatesfacilitating the reset of the Floater coupon and tenders of Floaters. If Floaters are tendered and the Company (in its role as remarketing agent) is unable to find a new investor within a specified period of time, it can declare a failed remarketing (in which case the trust is unwound) or it may choose to buy the Floaters into its own inventory and may continue to try to sell itthem to a third-party investor. While the level of the Company's inventory of Floaters fluctuates, the Company held none of the Floater inventory related to the Customer, Proprietary and QSPEcustomer or proprietary TOB programs as of September 30, 2009.2010.

                  Approximately $0.8 billion of the municipal bonds owned by TOB trusts have a credit guarantee provided by the Company. In all other cases, the assets are either unenhanced or are insured with a monoline insurance company. While the trusts have not encountered any adverse credit events as defined in the underlying trust agreements, certain monoline insurance companies have experienced downgrades. In these cases, the Company has proactively managed the TOB programs by applying additional insurance on the assets or proceeding with orderly unwinds of the trusts.

                  If a trust is unwound early due to an event other than a credit event on the underlying municipal bond, the underlying municipal bond is sold in the secondary market. If there is an accompanying shortfall in the trust's cash flows to fund the redemption of the Floaters after the sale of the


          Table of Contents

          underlying municipal bond, the trust draws on a liquidity agreement in an amount equal to the shortfall. Liquidity agreements are generally provided to the trust directly by the Company. For customer TOBs where the Residual is less than 25% of the trust's capital structure, the Company has a reimbursement agreement with the Residual holder under which the Residual holder reimburses the Company for any payment made under the liquidity arrangement. Through this reimbursement agreement, the Residual holder remains economically exposed to fluctuations in value of the municipal bond. These reimbursement agreements are actively margined based on changes in value of the underlying municipal bond to mitigate the Company's counterparty credit risk. In cases where a third party provides liquidity to a proprietary or QSPE TOB trust, a similar reimbursement arrangement is made whereby the Company (or a consolidated subsidiary of the Company) as Residual holder absorbs any losses incurred by the liquidity provider. As of September 30, 2009,2010, liquidity agreements provided with respect to customer TOB trusts, and other non-consolidated, customer-sponsored municipal investment funds, totaled $6.1$7.3 billion, offset by reimbursement agreements in place with a notional amount of $4.6$5.8 billion. The remaining exposure relates to TOB transactions where the Residual owned by the customer is at least 25% of the bond value at the inception of the transaction.transaction and no reimbursement agreement is executed. In addition, the Company has provided


          Table of Contents

          liquidity arrangements with a notional amount of $0.2$0.1 billion to QSPE TOB trusts andfor other non-consolidated proprietary TOB trusts described above.below.

                  The Company considers the customer and proprietary TOB trusts (excluding QSPE TOB trusts) to be VIEs. Customer TOB trusts were not consolidated by the Company in prior periods and remain unconsolidated upon the Company's adoption of SFAS 167. Because third-party investors hold the Residual and Floater interests in the customer TOB trusts, the Company's involvement and variable interests includeincludes only its role as remarketing agent and liquidity provider. OnThe Company has concluded that the basis of the variability absorbedpower over customer TOB trusts is primarily held by the customer throughResidual holder, who may unilaterally cause the reimbursement arrangement or significant residual investment,sale of the trust's bonds. Because the Company does not hold the Residual interest and thus does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the trust's economic performance, it does not consolidate the Customercustomer TOB trusts.trusts under SFAS 167.

                  Proprietary TOB trusts generally were consolidated in prior periods. They remain consolidated upon the Company's adoption of SFAS 167. The Company's variable interests ininvolvement with the Proprietary TOB trusts includeincludes holding the Residual interests as well as the remarkingremarketing and liquidity agreements with the trusts. On the basis of the variability absorbed through these contracts (primarily the Residual),Similar to customer TOB trusts, the Company generally consolidateshas concluded that the Proprietary TOB trusts. Finally, certainpower over the proprietary TOB trusts is primarily held by the Residual holder, who may unilaterally cause the sale of the trust's bonds. Because the Company holds the Residual interest, and thus has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the trust's economic performance, it continues to consolidate the proprietary TOB trusts under SFAS 167.

                  Prior to 2010, certain TOB trusts met the definition of a QSPE and were not consolidated in prior periods. Upon the Company's adoption of SFAS 167, former QSPE trusts have been consolidated by the Company as Residual interest holders and are presented as proprietary TOB trusts.

                  Total assets in proprietary TOB trusts also include $0.5 billion of assets where the Residuals are held by hedge funds that are consolidated and managed by the Company. The assets and the associated liabilities of these TOB trusts are not consolidated by the hedge funds (and, thus, are not consolidated by the Company) under the application of specificASC 946,Financial Services—Investment Companies, which precludes consolidation of owned investments. The Company consolidates the hedge funds, because the Company holds controlling financial interests in the hedge funds. Certain of the Company's equity investments in the hedge funds are hedged with derivatives transactions executed by the Company with third parties referencing the returns of the hedge fund. The Company's accounting literature. Forfor these hedge funds and their interests in the nonconsolidated proprietary TOB trusts and QSPE TOB trusts, the Company recognizes only its residual investment on its balance sheet at fair value and the third-party financing raisedis unchanged by the trusts is off-balance sheet.

                  The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to Citicorp's municipal bond securitizations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:

           
           Three months ended
          September 30,
           
          In billions of dollars 2009 2008 

          Proceeds from new securitizations

           $0.1 $0.6 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

           $0.1 $0.1 
                


           
           Nine months ended
          September 30,
           
          In billions of dollars 2009 2008 

          Proceeds from new securitizations

           $0.3 $1.1 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

           $0.7 $0.4 
                

                  The following table summarizes selected cash flow information related to Citi Holdings' municipal bond securitizations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008:


          Three months ended
          September 30,
          In billions of dollars20092008

          Proceeds from new securitizationsCompany's adoption of SFAS 167.

          $$

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

          $$


           
           Nine months ended
          September 30,
           
          In billions of dollars 2009 2008 

          Proceeds from new securitizations

           $ $0.1 

          Cash flows received on retained interests and other net cash flows

           $ $ 
                

          Municipal Investments

                  Municipal investment transactions representare primarily interests in partnerships that finance the construction and rehabilitation of low-income affordable rental housing.housing, facilitate lending in new or underserved markets, or finance the construction or operation of renewable municipal energy facilities. The Company generally invests in these partnerships as a limited partner and earns a return primarily through the receipt of tax credits and grants earned from the affordable housing investments made by the partnership. These entities are generally considered VIEs. The power to direct the activities of these entities is typically held by the general partner. Accordingly, these entities have remained unconsolidated by the Company upon adoption of SFAS 167.

          Client Intermediation

                  Client intermediation transactions represent a range of transactions designed to provide investors with specified returns based on the returns of an underlying security, referenced asset or index. These transactions include credit-linked notes and equity-linked notes. In these transactions, the SPE typically obtains exposure to the underlying security, referenced asset or index through a derivative instrument, such as a total-return swap or a credit-default swap. In turn the SPE issues notes to investors that pay a return based on the specified underlying security, referenced asset or index. The SPE invests the proceeds in a financial asset or a guaranteed insurance contract (GIC) that serves as collateral for the


          Table of Contents

          derivative contract over the term of the transaction. The Company's involvement in these transactions includes being the counterparty to the SPE's derivative instruments and investing in a portion of the notes issued by the SPE. In certain transactions, the investor's maximum risk of loss is limited and the Company absorbs risk of loss above a specified level. The Company does not have the power to direct the activities of the VIEs which most significantly impact their economic performance and thus it does not consolidate them.

                  The Company's maximum risk of loss in these transactions is defined as the amount invested in notes issued by the SPE and the notional amount of any risk of loss absorbed by the Company through a separate instrument issued by the SPE. The derivative instrument held by the Company may generate a receivable from the SPE (for example, where the Company purchases credit protection from the SPE in connection with the SPE's issuance of a credit-linked note), which is collateralized by the assets owned by the SPE. These


          Table of Contents

          derivative instruments are not considered variable interests and any associated receivables are not included in the calculation of maximum exposure to the SPE.

          Structured Investment Vehicles

                  Structured Investment Vehicles (SIVs) are SPEs that issue junior notes and senior debt (medium-term notes and short-term commercial paper) to fund the purchase of high quality assets. The Company actsacted as manager for the SIVs.

                  In order to complete the wind-down of the SIVs, the Company purchased the remaining assets of the SIVs in November 2008. The Company funded the purchase of the SIV assets by assuming the obligation to pay amounts due under the medium-term notes issued by the SIVs as the medium-term notes mature.

          Investment Funds

                  The Company is the investment manager for certain investment funds that invest in various asset classes including private equity, hedge funds, real estate, fixed income and infrastructure. The Company earns a management fee, which is a percentage of capital under management, and may earn performance fees. In addition, for some of these funds the Company has an ownership interest in the investment funds.

          The Company has also established a number of investment funds as opportunities for qualified employees to invest in private equity investments. The Company acts as investment manager to these funds and may provide employees with financing on both a recourse and non-recourse basis for a portion of the employees' investment commitments.

                  The Company has determined that a majority of the investment vehicles managed by Citigroup are provided a deferral from the requirements of SFAS 167, because they meet the criteria in Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-10,Consolidation (Topic 810), Amendments for Certain Investment Funds (ASU 2010-10) (see Note 1). These vehicles continue to be evaluated under the requirements of ASC 810-10, prior to the implementation of SFAS 167 (FIN 46(R)).

                  Where the Company has determined that certain investment vehicles are subject to the consolidation requirements of SFAS 167, the consolidation conclusions reached upon initial application of SFAS 167 are consistent with the consolidation conclusions reached under the requirements of ASC 810-10, prior to the implementation of SFAS 167.

          Trust Preferred Securities

                  The Company has raised financing through the issuance of trust preferred securities. In these transactions, the Company forms a statutory business trust and owns all of the voting equity shares of the trust. The trust issues preferred equity securities to third-party investors and invests the gross proceeds in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued by the Company. These trusts have no assets, operations, revenues or cash flows other than those related to the issuance, administration and repayment of the preferred equity securities held by third-party investors. These trusts' obligations are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the Company.

                  Because the sole asset of the trust is a receivable from the Company and the proceeds to the Company from the receivable exceed the Company's investment in the VIE's equity shares, the Company is not permitted to consolidate the trusts, even though the Company owns all of the voting equity shares of the trust, has fully guaranteed the trusts' obligations, and has the right to redeem the preferred securities in certain circumstances. The Company recognizes the subordinated debentures on its balance sheetConsolidated Balance Sheet as long-term liabilities.


          Table of Contents


          16.15.    DERIVATIVES ACTIVITIES

                  In the ordinary course of business, Citigroup enters into various types of derivative transactions. These derivative transactions include:

            Futures and forward contracts which are commitments to buy or sell at a future date a financial instrument, commodity or currency at a contracted price and may be settled in cash or through delivery.

            Swap contracts which are commitments to settle in cash at a future date or dates that may range from a few days to a number of years, based on differentials between specified financial indices, as applied to a notional principal amount.

            Option contracts which give the purchaser, for a fee, the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell within a limited time a financial instrument, commodity or currency at a contracted price that may also be settled in cash, based on differentials between specified indices or prices.

                  Citigroup enters into these derivative contracts relating to interest rate, foreign currency, commodity, and other market/credit risks for the following reasons:

            Trading Purposes—Customer Needs—Needs:Citigroup offers its customers derivatives in connection with their risk-management actions to transfer, modify or reduce their interest rate, foreign exchange and other market/credit risks or for their own trading purposes. As part of this process, Citigroup considers the customers' suitability for the risk involved and the business purpose for the transaction. Citigroup also manages its derivative-risk positions through offsetting trade activities, controls focused on price verification, and daily reporting of positions to senior managers.

            Trading Purposes—Own Account—Account:Citigroup trades derivatives for its own account and as an active market maker. Trading limits and price verification controls are key aspects of this activity.

            Hedging—Hedging:Citigroup uses derivatives in connection with its risk-management activities to hedge certain risks or reposition the risk profile of the Company. For example, Citigroup may issue fixed-rate long-term debt and then enter into a receive-fixed, pay-variable-rate interest rate swap with the same tenor and notional amount to convert the interest payments to a net variable-rate basis. This strategy is the most common form of an interest rate hedge, as it minimizes interest cost in certain yield curve environments. Derivatives are also used to manage risks inherent in specific groups of on-balance sheeton-balance-sheet assets and liabilities, including investments, corporate and consumer loans, deposit liabilities, as well as other interest-sensitive assets and liabilities. In addition, foreign- exchangeforeign-exchange contracts are used to hedge non-U.S. dollar denominatednon-U.S.-dollar-denominated debt, foreign-currency-denominated available-for-sale securities, net capital exposures and foreign-exchange transactions.

                  Derivatives may expose Citigroup to market, credit or liquidity risks in excess of the amounts recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Market risk on a derivative product is the exposure created by potential fluctuations in interest rates, foreign-exchange rates and other factors and is a function of the type of product, the volume of transactions, the tenor and terms of the agreement, and the underlying volatility. Credit risk is the exposure to loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the transaction where the value of any collateral held is not adequate to cover such losses. The recognition in earnings of unrealized gains on these transactions is subject to management's assessment as to collectability. Liquidity risk is the potential exposure that arises when the size of the derivative position may not be able to be rapidly adjusted in periods of high volatility and financial stress at a reasonable cost.

                  Information pertaining to the volume of derivative activity is provided in the tables below. The notional amounts, of Citigroup's derivative instruments for both long and short derivative positions, representing the volume of Citigroup's derivative activity,instruments as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are presented in the table below:below.


          Table of Contents

          Derivative Notionals



           Hedging
          Instruments
          under
          ASC 815 (SFAS 133)(1)
           Other Derivative Instruments 
           Hedging instruments under
          ASC 815 (SFAS 133)(1)(2)
           Other derivative instruments 
          In millions of dollars at September 30, 2009  
           Trading
          Derivatives
           Management
          Hedges(2)
           


            
            
           Trading derivatives Management hedges(3) 
          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           September 30,
          2010
           December 31,
          2009
           

          Interest rate contracts

          Interest rate contracts

           

          Interest rate contracts

           

          Swaps

           $130,241 $14,903,492 $194,225 

          Swaps

           $156,634 $128,797 $27,006,830 $20,571,814 $123,701 $107,193 

          Futures and forwards

            3,876,745 84,999 

          Futures and forwards

             5,726,949 3,366,927 61,588 65,597 

          Written options

            3,214,707 9,493 

          Written options

             3,484,198 3,616,240 12,232 11,050 

          Purchased options

            3,468,676 43,537 

          Purchased options

             3,160,691 3,590,032 13,935 28,725 
                               

          Total interest rate contract notionals

          Total interest rate contract notionals

           $130,241 $25,463,620 $332,254 

          Total interest rate contract notionals

           $156,634 $128,797 $39,378,668 $31,145,013 $211,456 $212,565 
                               

          Foreign exchange contracts

          Foreign exchange contracts

           

          Foreign exchange contracts

           

          Swaps

           $61,527 $867,475 $101,151 

          Swaps

           $28,296 $42,621 $1,087,603 $855,560 $27,828 $24,044 

          Futures and forwards

           18,190 2,025,595 10,672 

          Futures and forwards

           91,747 76,507 2,549,208 1,946,802 31,383 54,249 

          Written options

           316 392,903 15,150 

          Written options

           2,779 4,685 592,512 409,991 278 9,305 

          Purchased options

           501 415,386 2,603 

          Purchased options

           9,423 22,594 582,244 387,786 871 10,188 
                               

          Total foreign exchange contract notionals

          Total foreign exchange contract notionals

           $80,534 $3,701,359 $129,576 

          Total foreign exchange contract notionals

           $132,245 $146,407 $4,811,567 $3,600,139 $60,360 $97,786 
                               

          Equity contracts

          Equity contracts

           

          Equity contracts

           

          Swaps

           $ $81,620 $ 

          Swaps

           $ $ $66,644 $59,391 $ $ 

          Futures and forwards

            14,567  

          Futures and forwards

             21,952 14,627   

          Written options

            528,027  

          Written options

             612,793 410,002   

          Purchased options

            505,812  

          Purchased options

             525,234 377,961  275 
                               

          Total equity contract notionals

          Total equity contract notionals

           $ $1,130,026 $ 

          Total equity contract notionals

           $ $ $1,226,623 $861,981 $ $275 
                               

          Commodity and other contracts

          Commodity and other contracts

           

          Commodity and other contracts

           

          Swaps

           $ $29,746 $ 

          Swaps

           $ $ $20,624 $25,956 $ $ 

          Futures and forwards

            101,574  

          Futures and forwards

             120,397 91,582   

          Written options

            39,066  

          Written options

             63,641 37,952   

          Purchased options

            40,662  

          Purchased options

             64,800 40,321  3 
                               

          Total commodity and other contract notionals

          Total commodity and other contract notionals

           $ $211,048 $ 

          Total commodity and other contract notionals

           $ $ $269,462 $195,811 $ $3 
                               

          Credit derivatives(3)

           

          Credit derivatives(4)

          Credit derivatives(4)

           

          Citigroup as the Guarantor

           $ $1,315,106 $ 

          Protection sold

           $ $ $1,263,870 $1,214,053 $ $ 

          Citigroup as the Beneficiary

           6,773 1,442,602  

          Protection purchased

           6,506 6,981 1,340,915 1,325,981 34,195  
                               

          Total credit derivatives

          Total credit derivatives

           $6,773 $2,757,708 $ 

          Total credit derivatives

           $6,506 $6,981 $2,604,785 $2,540,034 $34,195 $ 
                               

          Total derivative notionals

          Total derivative notionals

           $217,548 $33,263,761 $461,830 

          Total derivative notionals

           $295,385 $282,185 $48,291,105 $38,342,978 $306,011 $310,629 
                               

          (1)
          The notional amounts presented in this table do not include derivatives in hedge accounting relationships under ASC 815 (SFAS 133), where Citigroup is hedging the foreign currency risk of a net investment in a foreign operation by issuing a foreign currency denominated debt instrument. The notional amount of such debt is $9,778 million and $7,442 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

          (2)
          Derivatives in hedge accounting relationships accounted for under ASC 815 (SFAS 133) are recorded in eitherOther assets/liabilities orTrading account assets/liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

          (2)(3)
          Management hedges represent derivative instruments used in certain economic hedging relationships that are identified for management purposes, but for which hedge accounting is not applied. These derivatives are recorded inOther assets/liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

          (3)(4)
          Credit derivatives are arrangements designed to allow one party (the "beneficiary")(protection buyer) to transfer the credit risk of a "reference asset" to another party (the "guarantor")(protection seller). These arrangements allow a guarantorprotection seller to assume the credit risk associated with the reference asset without directly purchasing it.that asset. The Company has entered into credit derivatives positions for purposes such as risk management, yield enhancement, reduction of credit concentrations and diversification of overall risk.

          Table of Contents

          Derivative Mark-to-Market (MTM) Receivables/Payables



           Derivatives classified in Trading
          account assets / liabilities(1)
           Derivatives classified in
          Other
          assets / liabilities
            Derivatives classified in trading
          account assets/liabilities(1)
           Derivatives classified in other
          assets/liabilities
           
          In millions of dollars at September 30, 2009 Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities 

          Derivative instruments designated as hedges

           
          In millions of dollars at September 30, 2010 Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities 

          Derivative instruments designated as ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedges

           

          Interest rate contracts

           $1,123 $227 $10,086 $3,459 

          Foreign exchange contracts

           469 1,449 1,283 3,122 

          Interest rate contracts

           $2,860 $4,380 $5,551 $1,156          

          Foreign exchange contracts

           134 1,246 3,942 2,826 

          Credit derivatives

              110 
                   

          Total derivative instruments designated as hedges

           $2,994 $5,626 $9,493 $4,092 

          Total derivative instruments designated as ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedges

           $1,592 $1,676 $11,369 $6,581 
                            

          Other derivative instruments

          Other derivative instruments

            

          Interest rate contracts

           $523,370 $505,442 $3,062 $4,727 

          Foreign exchange contracts

           88,944 89,225 1,233 1,240 

          Equity contracts

           23,706 47,070   

          Commodity and other contracts

           16,692 16,275   

          Credit derivatives(2)

           112,227 100,575   

          Interest rate contracts

           $668,787 $666,488 $3,793 $2,814 

          Foreign exchange contracts

           99,464 105,722 2,519 879 

          Equity contracts

           19,557 37,749   

          Commodity and other contracts

           14,159 14,863   

          Credit derivatives(2)

           73,186 67,185 229 294 
                            

          Total other derivative instruments

          Total other derivative instruments

           $764,939 $758,587 $4,295 $5,967  $875,153 $892,007 $6,541 $3,987 
                            

          Total derivatives

          Total derivatives

           $767,933 $764,213 $13,788 $10,059  $876,745 $893,683 $17,910 $10,568 

          Cash collateral paid/received

          Cash collateral paid/received

           54,169 43,471 510 5,720  61,457 46,590 275 4,940 

          Less: Netting agreements and market value adjustments

           (882,642) (877,807) (4,221) (4,221)

          Less: Netting agreements and market value adjustments

           (753,432) (745,132) (4,713) (4,713)         

          Net receivables/payables

           $55,560 $62,466 $13,964 $11,287 
                            

          Net receivables/ payables

           $68,670 $62,552 $9,585 $11,066 
                   

          (1)
          The trading derivatives fair values are presented in Note 9—Trading Assets and Liabilities.9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

          (2)
          The credit derivatives trading assets are comprisedcomposed of $88,903$53,234 million related to protection purchased and $23,324$19,952 million related to protection sold atas of September 30, 2010. The credit derivatives trading liabilities are composed of $19,454 million related to protection purchased and $47,731 million related to protection sold as of September 30, 2010.

           
           Derivatives classified in trading
          account assets/liabilities(1)
           Derivatives classified in other
          assets/liabilities
           
          In millions of dollars at December 31, 2009 Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities 

          Derivative instruments designated as ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedges

                       

          Interest rate contracts

           $304 $87 $4,267 $2,898 

          Foreign exchange contracts

            753  1,580  3,599  1,416 
                    

          Total derivative instruments designated as ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedges

           $1,057 $1,667 $7,866 $4,314 
                    

          Other derivative instruments

                       

          Interest rate contracts

           $454,974 $449,551 $2,882 $3,022 

          Foreign exchange contracts

            71,005  70,584  1,498  2,381 

          Equity contracts

            18,132  40,612  6  5 

          Commodity and other contracts

            16,698  15,492     

          Credit derivatives(2)

            92,792  82,424     
                    

          Total other derivative instruments

           $653,601 $658,663 $4,386 $5,408 
                    

          Total derivatives

           $654,658 $660,330 $12,252 $9,722 

          Cash collateral paid/received

            48,561  38,611  263  4,950 

          Less: Netting agreements and market value adjustments

            (644,340) (634,835) (4,224) (4,224)
                    

          Net receivables/payables

           $58,879 $64,106 $8,291 $10,448 
                    

          (1)
          The trading derivatives fair values are presented in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

          (2)
          The credit derivatives trading assets are composed of $68,558 million related to protection purchased and $24,234 million related to protection sold as of December 31, 2009. The credit derivatives trading liabilities are comprisedcomposed of $76,581$24,162 million related to protection purchased and $58,262 million related to protection sold and $23,994 related to protection purchased at September 30,as of December 31, 2009.

                  All derivatives are reported on the balance sheet at fair value. In addition, where applicable, all such contracts covered by master netting agreements are reported net. Gross positive fair values are netted with gross negative fair values by counterparty pursuant to a valid master netting agreement. In addition, payables and receivables in respect of cash collateral received from or paid to a given counterparty are included in this netting. However, non-cash collateral is not included.

                  As of September 30, 2009 theThe amount of payables in respect of cash collateral received that was netted with unrealized gains from derivatives was $36$40 billion while theand $30 billion as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The amount of receivables in respect of cash collateral paid that was netted with unrealized losses from derivatives was $46 billion.$56 billion as of September 30, 2010 and $41 billion as of December 31, 2009, respectively.

                  The amounts recognized in principalPrincipal transactions in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 related to derivatives not designated in a qualifying hedging relationship as well as the underlying non-derivative instruments are shownincluded in the table below. Citigroup has elected to present this disclosure by business classification, showing derivative gains and losses related to its trading activities together with gains and losses related to non-derivative instruments within the same trading portfolios, as this better represents the way that these portfolios are risk managed.

          In millions of dollars Gains (losses)
          Three months ended September 30, 2009
           Gains (losses)
          Nine months ended September 30, 2009
           
           

          Fixed Income

           $428 $5,359 
           

          Foreign exchange

            445  2,157 
           

          Equity

            (353) 550 
           

          Commodity and other products

            162  990 
           

          Credit products

            846  (3,500)
                

          Total(1)

           $1,528 $5,556 
                

          (1)
          Balance excludes gains (losses) on derivatives designated within qualifying FAS 133 hedging relationships.

          Table of Contents

           
           Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 
          In millions of dollars 2010(1) 2009(1) 2010(1) 2009(1) 

          Interest rate contracts

           $76 $166 $3,718 $6,619 

          Foreign exchange contracts

            992  522  1,495  2,386 

          Equity contracts

            468  (353) 783  550 

          Commodity and other contracts

            (33) 162  197  989 

          Credit derivatives

            25  846  1,705  (3,500)
                    

          Total Citigroup(2)

           $1,528 $1,343 $7,898 $7,044 
                    

          (1)
          Beginning in the second quarter of 2010, for clarity purposes, Citigroup has reclassified the MSR mark-to-market and MSR hedging activities from multiple income statement lines intoOther revenue. All periods presented reflect this reclassification.

          (2)
          Also see Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

                  The amounts recognized in otherOther revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 related to derivatives not designated in a qualifying hedging relationship and not recorded withinTrading account assets orTrading account liabilities are shown below. The table below does not include the offsetting gains/losses on the hedged items, which amounts are also recorded inOther revenue.

           Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 
          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars Gains (losses)
          Three months ended September 30, 2009
           Gains (losses)
          Nine months ended September 30, 2009
            2010(1) 2009(1) 2010(1) 2009(1) 

          Interest rate contracts

           $750 $91 $451 $(259)

          Foreign exchange contracts

           3,895 2,077 (1,930) 4,545 

          Equity contracts

               

          Commodity and other contracts

               

          Credit derivatives

           (389)  (248)  

          Interest rate contracts

           $(384)$36          

          Total Citigroup(2)

           $4,256 $2,168 $(1,727)$4,286 

          Foreign exchange contracts

           (2,130) (4,496)         

          Equity contracts

             

          Commodity and other contracts

             

          Credit derivatives

             
               

          Total(1)

           $(2,514)$(4,460)
               

          (1)
          Beginning in the second quarter of 2010, for clarity purposes, Citigroup has reclassified the MSR mark-to-market and MSR hedging activities from multiple income statement lines intoOther revenue. All periods presented reflect this reclassification.

          (2)
          Non-designated derivatives are derivative instruments not designated in qualifying hedging relationships.

          Accounting for Derivative Hedging

                  Citigroup accounts for its hedging activities in accordance with ASC 815, (SFASDerivatives and Hedging (formerly SFAS 133). As a general rule, hedge accounting is permitted for those situations where the Company is exposed to a particular risk, such as interest-rate or foreign-exchange risk, that causes changes in the fair value of an asset or liability or variability in the expected future cash flows of an existing asset, liability or a forecasted transaction that may affect earnings.

                  Derivative contracts hedging the risks associated with the changes in fair value are referred to as fair value hedges, while contracts hedging the risks affecting the expected future cash flows are called cash flow hedges. Hedges that utilize derivatives or debt instruments to manage the foreign exchange risk associated with equity investments in non-U.S. dollarnon-U.S.-dollar functional currency foreign subsidiaries (net investment in a foreign operation) are called net investment hedges.

                  If certain hedging criteria specified in ASC 815 (SFAS 133) are met, including testing for hedge effectiveness, special hedge accounting may be applied. The hedge effectiveness assessment methodologies for similar hedges are performed in a similar manner and are used consistently throughout the hedging relationships. For fair value hedges, the changes in value of the hedging derivative, as well as the changes in value of the related hedged item due to the risk being hedged, are reflected in current earnings. For cash flow hedges and net investment hedges, the changes in value of the hedging derivative are reflected inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in Citigroup's stockholders' equity, to the extent the hedge is effective. Hedge ineffectiveness, in either case, is reflected in current earnings.

                  For asset/liability management hedging, the fixed-rate long-term debt may be recorded at amortized cost under current U.S. GAAP. However, by electing to use ASC 815 (SFAS 133) hedge accounting, the carrying value of the debt is adjusted for changes in the benchmark interest rate, with any such changes in value recorded in current earnings. The related interest-rate swap is also recorded on the balance sheet at fair value, with any changes in fair value reflected in earnings. Thus, any ineffectiveness resulting from the hedging relationship is recorded in current earnings. Alternatively, an economic hedge, which does not meet the ASC 815 hedging criteria, would involve recording only recording the derivative at fair value on the balance sheet, with its associated changes in fair value recorded in earnings. The debt would continue to be carried at amortized cost and, therefore, current earnings would be impacted only by the interest rate shifts and other factors that cause the change in the swap's value and the underlying yield of the debt. This type of hedge is undertaken when hedgehedging requirements cannot be achieved or management decides not to apply ASC 815 hedge accounting. Another alternative for the Company would be to elect to carry the debt at fair value.value under the fair value option. Once the irrevocable election is made upon issuance of the debt, the full change in fair value of the debt would be reported in earnings. The related interest rate swap, with changes in fair value, would also be reflected in earnings, and provides a natural offset to the debt's fair value change. To the extent the two offsets would not be exactly equal, the difference would be reflected in current earnings. This type of economic hedge is undertaken when the Company prefers to follow this


          Table of Contents

          simpler method that achieves generally similar financial statement results to a fair-valuean ASC 815 fair value hedge.

                  Key aspects of achieving ASC 815 hedge accounting are documentation of hedging strategy and hedge effectiveness at the hedge inception and substantiating hedge effectiveness on an ongoing basis. A derivative must be highly effective in accomplishing the hedge objective of offsetting either changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item for the risk being hedged. Any ineffectiveness in the hedge relationship is recognized in current earnings. The assessment of effectiveness excludes changes in the value of the hedged item that are unrelated to the risks being hedged. Similarly, the assessment of effectiveness may exclude changes in the fair value of a derivative related to time value that, if excluded, are recognized in current earnings.


          Table of Contents

          Fair value hedgesValue Hedges

          Hedging of benchmark interest rate risk

                  Citigroup hedges exposure to changes in the fair value of outstanding fixed-rate issued debt and borrowings.certificate of deposit. The fixed cash flows from those financing transactions are converted to benchmark variable-rate cash flows by entering into receive fixed,receive-fixed, pay-variable interest rate swaps. These fair-valueMost of these fair value hedge relationships use dollar-offset ratio analysis to determine whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis.basis, while others use regression.

                  Citigroup also hedges exposure to changes in the fair value of fixed-rate assets, including available-for-sale debt securities and loans. The hedging instruments used are receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swaps. Most of these fair-valuefair value hedging relationships use dollar-offset ratio analysis to determine whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis, while certain others use regression analysis.

          Hedging of foreign exchange risk

                  Citigroup hedges the change in fair value attributable to foreign-exchange rate movements in available-for-sale securities that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of the entity holding the securities, which may be within or outside the U.S. The hedging instrument employed is a forward foreign-exchange contract. In this type of hedge, the change in fair value of the hedged available-for-sale security attributable to the portion of foreign exchange risk hedged is reported in earnings and notAccumulated other comprehensive income—incomea process that serves to offset substantially the change in fair value of the forward contract that is also reflected in earnings. Citigroup considers the premium associated with forward contracts (differential between spot and contractual forward rates) as the cost of hedging; this is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and reflected directly in earnings. Dollar-offset method is used to assess hedge effectiveness. Since that assessment is based on changes in fair value attributable to changes in spot rates on both the available-for-sale securities and the forward contracts for the portion of the relationship hedged, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant.

                  The following table summarizes certain information related tothe gains (losses) on the Company's fair value hedges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009:

           Gains (losses) on fair value hedges(1) 


           Three months ended
          September 30, 2009
           Nine months ended
          September 30, 2009
            Three Months ended September 30, Nine Months ended September 30, 
          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars Principal
          Transactions
           Other
          Revenue
           Principal
          Transactions
           Other
          Revenue
            2010 2009 2010 2009 

          Gain (loss) on designated and qualifying fair value hedges

           

          Interest rate contracts

           $(238)$1,511 $727 $(4,375)

          Foreign exchange contracts

           (640) 323 663 645 

          Gain (loss) on fair value designated and qualifying hedges

           

          Interest rate contracts

           $1,603 $1,273 $3,945 $(3,648)

          Foreign exchange contracts

           (993) (317) 681 1,308 
                            

          Total gain (loss) on fair value designated and qualifying hedges

          Total gain (loss) on fair value designated and qualifying hedges

           $(878)$1,834 $1,390 $(3,730) $610 $956 $4,626 $(2,340)
                            

          Gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges

          Gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges

            

          Interest rate hedges

           $(1,712)$(1,223)$(4,160)$3,725 

          Foreign exchange hedges

           1,095 424 (496) (1,010)

          Interest rate hedges

           $293 $(1,516)$(749)$4,474          

          Foreign exchange hedges

           717 (293) (434) (576)
                   

          Total gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedge

           $1,010 $(1,809)$(1,183)$3,898 

          Total gain (loss) on the hedged item in designated and qualifying fair value hedges

           $(617)$(799)$(4,656)$2,715 
                            

          Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges

          Hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges

            

          Interest rate hedges

           $182 $(106)$313 $(21)

          Foreign exchange hedges

           14 60 22 92 

          Interest rate hedges

           $(111)$76 $(178)$292 

          Foreign exchange hedges

           4 74 30 114 
                            

          Total hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges

          Total hedge ineffectiveness recognized in earnings on designated and qualifying fair value hedges

           $196 $(46)$335 $71  $(107)$150 $(148)$406 
                            

          Net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges

          Net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges

            

          Interest rate contracts

           $(127)$101 $(335)$120 

          Foreign exchange contracts

           63 (30) 207 (23)

          Interest rate contracts

           $2 $(26)$(37)$(215)

          Foreign exchange contracts

           98 33 155 184 
                            

          Total net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges

          Total net gain (loss) excluded from assessment of the effectiveness of fair value hedges

           $(64)$71 $(128)$97  $100 $7 $118 $(31)
                            

          (1)
          Amounts are included inOther revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income. The accrued interest income on fair value hedges is recorded inNet interest revenue and is excluded from this table.

          Table of Contents

          Cash flow hedgesFlow Hedges

          Hedging of benchmark interest rate risk

                  Citigroup hedges variable cash flows resulting from floating-rate liabilities and roll overroll-over (re-issuance) of short-term liabilities. Variable cash flows from those liabilities are converted to fixed-rate cash flows by entering into receive-variable, pay-fixed interest-rate swaps and receive-variable, pay-fixed forward-starting interest-rate swaps. For some hedges, the hedge ineffectiveness is eliminated by matching all terms of the hedged item and the hedging derivative at inception and on an ongoing basis. Citigroup does not exclude any terms from consideration when applying the matched terms method. To the extent all terms are not perfectly matched, theseThese cash-flow hedging relationships use either regression analysis or dollar-offset ratio analysis to assess whether the hedging relationships are highly effective at inception and on an ongoing basis. Since efforts are made to match the terms of the derivatives to those of the hedged forecasted cash flows as closely as possible, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant even when the terms do not match perfectly.significant.

          Hedging of foreign exchange risk

                  Citigroup locks in the functional currency equivalent of cash flows of various balance sheet liability exposures, including short-term borrowings and long-term debt (and the forecasted issuances or rollover of such items) that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the issuing entity. Depending on the risk-management objectives, these types of hedges are designated as either cash-flow hedges of only foreign exchange risk or cash-flow hedges of both foreign-exchange and interest rate risk, and the hedging instruments used are foreign-exchange forward contracts, cross-currency swaps and foreign-currency options. For some hedges, Citigroup matches all terms of the hedged item and the hedging derivative at inception and on an ongoing basis to eliminate hedge ineffectiveness. Citigroup does not exclude any terms from consideration when applying the matched terms method. To the extent all terms are not perfectly matched, any ineffectiveness is measured using the "hypothetical derivative method" from FASB Derivative Implementation Group Issue G7 (now ASC 815-30-35-12 through 35-32). Efforts are made to match up the terms of the hypothetical and actual derivatives used as closely as possible. As a result, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness is not significant even when the terms do not match perfectly.

          Hedging total return

                  Citigroup generally manages the risk associated with highly leveraged financing it has entered into by seeking to sell a majority of its exposures to the market prior to or shortly after funding. The portion of the highly leveraged financing that is retained by Citigroup is hedged with a total return swap.

                  The amount of hedge ineffectiveness on the cash flow hedges recognized in earnings totals $3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and $12 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

                  The pretax change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from cash flow hedges for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009 is presented below:not significant.

          In millions of dollars Three months
          ended
          September 30, 2009
           Nine months
          ended
          September 30, 2009
           

          Effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI

                 
           

          Interest rate contracts

           $(291)$279 
           

          Foreign exchange contracts

            (312) 321 
           

          Credit derivatives

            (404) (46)
                

          Total effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI

           $(1,007)$554 
                

          Effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to Earnings

                 
           

          Interest rate contracts(1)

           $(431)$(1,288)
           

          Foreign exchange contracts(2)

            (149) (128)
           

          Credit derivatives

               
                

          Total effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to Earnings

           $(580)$(1,416)
                

          (1)
          The amount reclassifiedpretax change inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) from AOCI, related to interest rate cash flow hedges to Other revenuefor three and Principal transactions is ($404) million and ($27) million, respectively for the three months ended September 30, 2009, and ($1,166) million and ($122) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.

          (2)
          The amount reclassified from AOCI, related to foreign exchange cash flow hedges, to Other Revenue2010 and Principal transactions is $(146) million and ($3) million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 is presented below:

           
           Three Months ended September 30, Nine Months ended September 30, 
          In millions of dollars 2010 2009 2010 2009 

          Effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI

                       

          Interest rate contracts

           $(239)$(291)$(864)$279 

          Foreign exchange contracts

            (379) (312) (768) 321 

          Credit derivatives

              (404)   (46)
                    

          Total effective portion of cash flow hedges included in AOCI

           $(618)$(1,007)$(1,632)$554 
                    

          Effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to earnings

                       

          Interest rate contracts

            (326)$(431)$(1,060)$(1,288)

          Foreign exchange contracts

            (97) (149) (378) (128)
                    

          Total effective portion of cash flow hedges reclassified from AOCI to earnings(1)

           $(423)$(580)$(1,438)$(1,416)
                    

          (1)
          Included primarily inOther revenueand $(121) million and ($7) million forNet interest revenue on the nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.Consolidated Income Statement.

                  For cash flow hedges, any changes in the fair value of the end-user derivative remaining inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the Consolidated Balance Sheet will be included in earnings of future periods to offset the variability of the hedged cash flows when such cash flows affect earnings. The net loss associated with cash flow hedges expected to be reclassified fromAccumulated other comprehensive income within 12 months of September 30, 20092010 is approximately $2.1$1.6 billion. The maximum length of time over which forecasted cash flows are hedged is 10 years.

                  The impact of cash flow hedges on AOCI is also included withinshown in Note 1413 to the Consolidated Financial Statements—Changes in Accumulated Comprehensive Income (Loss).Statements.


          Table of Contents

          Net investment hedgesInvestment Hedges

                  Consistent with ASC 815-20-25-58 (SFAS 133)830-20,Foreign Currency Matters—Foreign Currency Transactions (formerly SFAS 52,Foreign Currency Translation), ASC 815 allows hedging of the foreign-currency risk of a net investment in a foreign operation. Citigroup uses foreign-currency forwards, options and swaps and foreign-currency-denominated debt instruments to manage the foreign-exchange risk associated with Citigroup's equity investments in several non-U.S. dollar functional currency foreign subsidiaries. Citigroup records the change in the carrying amount of these investments in theCumulative translation adjustment account withinAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Simultaneously, the effective portion of the hedge of this exposure is also recorded in theCumulative translation


          Table of Contents

          adjustment account and the ineffective portion, if any, is immediately recorded in earnings.

                  For derivatives used in net investment hedges, Citigroup follows the forward-rate method.method from FASB Derivative Implementation Group Issue H8 (now ASC 815-35-35-16 through 35-26), "Foreign Currency Hedges: Measuring the Amount of Ineffectiveness in a Net Investment Hedge." According to that method, all changes in fair value, including changes related to the forward-rate component of the foreign-currency forward contracts and the time-value of foreign-currency options, are recorded in the foreign currency.

          Cumulative translation adjustment account.account. For foreign-currency denominated debt instruments that are designated as hedges of net investments, the translation gain or loss that is recorded in the cumulativeforeign-currency translation adjustment account is based on the spot exchange rate between the functional currency of the respective subsidiary and the U.S. dollar, which is the functional currency of Citigroup. To the extent the notional amount of the hedging instrument exactly matches the hedged net investment and the underlying exchange rate of the derivative hedging instrument relates to the exchange rate between the functional currency of the net investment and Citigroup's functional currency (or, in the case of a non-derivative debt instrument, such instrument is denominated in the functional currency of the net investment), no ineffectiveness is recorded in earnings.

                  The following table summarizes certain informationpretax loss recorded in foreign-currency translation adjustment withinAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss), related to the Company'seffective portion of the net investment hedges, is $3.3 billion and $2.8 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009:

          Net Investments Hedges(1)
          In millions of dollars
           Three months
          ended
          September 30, 2009
           Nine months
          ended
          September 30, 2009
           

          Pretax gain (loss) included in FX translation adjustment with AOCI

           $(1,232)$(4,144)

          Gain (loss) on hedge ineffectiveness on net investment hedges included in Other revenue

           $ $4 
                

          (1)
          No amount, related to the effective portion of net investment hedges, was reclassed from AOCI to earnings2010 and $1.5 billion and $4.5 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009. Additionally, no amount was excluded from the assessment of the effectiveness of the net investment hedges during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
          2009, respectively.

          Credit Derivatives

                  A credit derivative is a bilateral contract between a buyer and a seller under which the seller agrees to provide protection to the buyer against the credit risk of a particular entity ("reference entity" or "reference credit"). Credit derivatives generally require that the seller of credit protection make payments to the buyer upon the occurrence of predefined credit events (commonly referred to as "settlement triggers"). These settlement triggers are defined by the form of the derivative and the reference credit and are generally limited to the market standard of failure to pay on indebtedness and bankruptcy of the reference credit and, in a more limited range of transactions, debt restructuring. Credit derivative transactions referring to emerging market reference credits will also typically include additional settlement triggers to cover the acceleration of indebtedness and the risk of repudiation or a payment moratorium. In certain transactions, protection may be provided on a portfolio of referenced credits or asset-backed securities. The seller of such protection may not be required to make payment until a specified amount of losses has occurred with respect to the portfolio and/or may only be required to pay for losses up to a specified amount.

                  The Company makes markets in and trades a range of credit derivatives, both on behalf of clients as well as for its own account. Through these contracts, the Company either purchases or writes protection on either a single name or a portfolio of reference credits. The Company uses credit derivatives to help mitigate credit risk in its corporate and consumer loan portfolioportfolios and other cash positions, to take proprietary trading positions, and to facilitate client transactions.


          Table of Contents

                  The range of credit derivatives sold includes credit default swaps, total return swaps and credit options.

                  A credit default swap is a contract in which, for a fee, a protection seller (guarantor) agrees to reimburse a protection buyer (beneficiary) for any losses that occur due to a credit event on a reference entity. If there is no credit default event or settlement trigger, as defined by the specific derivative contract, then the guarantorprotection seller makes no payments to the beneficiaryprotection buyer and receives only the contractually specified fee. However, if a credit event occurs as defined in the specific derivative contract sold, the guarantorprotection seller will be required to make a payment to the beneficiary.protection buyer.

                  A total return swap transfers the total economic performance of a reference asset, which includes all associated cash flows, as well as capital appreciation or depreciation. The protection buyer (beneficiary) receives a floating rate of interest and any depreciation on the reference asset from the protection seller (guarantor) and, in return, the protection seller receives the cash flows associated with the reference asset plus any appreciation. Thus, according to the total return swap agreement, the beneficiaryprotection seller will be obligated to make a payment any timeanytime the floating interest rate payment and any depreciation of the reference asset exceed the cash flows associated with the underlying asset. A total return swap may terminate upon a default of the reference asset subject to the provisions of the related total return swap agreement between the protection seller (guarantor) and the protection buyer (beneficiary).buyer.

                  A credit option is a credit derivative that allows investors to trade or hedge changes in the credit quality of the reference asset. For example, in a credit spread option, the option writer (guarantor) assumes the obligation to purchase or sell the reference asset at a specified "strike" spread level. The option purchaser (beneficiary) buys the right to sell the reference asset to, or purchase it from, the option writer at the strike spread level. The payments on credit spread options depend either on a particular credit spread or the price of the underlying credit-sensitive asset. The options usually terminate if the underlying assets default.

                  A credit-linked note is a form of credit derivative structured as a debt security with an embedded credit default swap. The purchaser of the note writes credit protection to the issuer, and receives a return which will be negatively affected by credit events on the underlying reference credit. If the reference entity defaults, the purchaser of the credit-linked note may assume the long position in the debt security and any future cash flows from it, but will lose the amount paid to the issuer of the credit-linked note. Thus the maximum amount of the exposure is the carrying amount of the credit-linked note. As of September 30, 20092010 and December 31,


          Table of Contents

          2008, 2009, the amount of credit-linked notes held by the Company in trading inventory was immaterial.


          Table of Contents

                  The following tables summarize the key characteristics of the Company's credit derivative portfolio as protection seller (guarantor) as of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:

          In millions of dollars as of
          September 30, 2009
           Maximum potential
          amount of
          future payments
           Fair value
          payable(1)
           
          In millions of dollars as of
          September 30, 2010
           Maximum potential
          amount of
          future payments
           Fair value
          payable(1)
           

          By industry/counterparty

            

          Bank

           $860,437 $46,071  $824,452 $28,175 

          Broker-dealer

           301,216 17,661  321,330 12,789 

          Monoline

             

          Non-financial

           2,127 96  1,690 51 

          Insurance and other financial institutions

           151,326 12,753  116,398 6,716 
                    

          Total by industry/counterparty

           $1,315,106 $76,581  $1,263,870 $47,731 
                    

          By instrument:

           

          By instrument

           

          Credit default swaps and options

           $1,314,282 $76,383  $1,262,408 $47,419 

          Total return swaps

           824 198 

          Total return swaps and other

           1,462 312 
                    

          Total by instrument

           $1,315,106 $76,581  $1,263,870 $47,731 
                    

          By rating:

           

          By rating

           

          Investment grade

           $759,845 23,362  $535,545 7,587 

          Non-investment grade

           422,865 33,231  472,696 26,705 

          Not rated

           132,396 19,988  255,629 13,439 
                    

          Total by rating

           $1,315,106 $76,581  $1,263,870 $47,731 
                    

          By maturity:

           

          Within 1 year

           $154,308 $968 

          From 1 to 5 years

           871,926 24,238 

          After 5 years

           237,636 22,525 
               

          Total by maturity

           $1,263,870 $47,731 
               

          (1)
          In addition, fair value amounts receivable under credit derivatives sold were $23,324$19,952 million.

          In millions of dollars as of
          December 31, 2008
           Maximum potential
          amount of
          future payments
           Fair
          value
          payable(1)
           
          In millions of dollars as of
          December 31, 2009
           Maximum potential
          amount of
          future payments
           Fair value
          payable(1)
           

          By industry/counterparty

            

          Bank

           $943,949 $118,428  $807,484 $34,666 

          Broker-dealer

           365,664 55,458  340,949 16,309 

          Monoline

           139 91  33  

          Non-financial

           7,540 2,556  623 262 

          Insurance and other financial institutions

           125,988 21,700  64,964 7,025 
                    

          Total by industry/counterparty

           $1,443,280 $198,233  $1,214,053 $58,262 
                    

          By instrument:

           

          By instrument

           

          Credit default swaps and options

           $1,441,375 $197,981  $1,213,208 $57,987 

          Total return swaps

           1,905 252 

          Total return swaps and other

           845 275 
                    

          Total by instrument

           $1,443,280 $198,233  $1,214,053 $58,262 
                    

          By rating:

           

          By rating

           

          Investment grade

           $851,426 $83,672  $576,930 9,632 

          Non-investment grade

           410,483 87,508  339,920 28,664 

          Not rated

           181,371 27,053  297,203 19,966 
                    

          Total by rating

           $1,443,280 $198,233  $1,214,053 $58,262 
                    

          By maturity:

           

          Within 1 year

           $165,056 $873 

          From 1 to 5 years

           806,143 30,181 

          After 5 years

           242,854 27,208 
               

          Total by maturity

           $1,214,053 $58,262 
               

          (1)
          In addition, fair value amounts receivable under credit derivatives sold were $5,890$24,234 million.

                  Citigroup evaluates the payment/performance risk of the credit derivatives to which it stands as guarantora protection seller based on the credit rating which has been assigned to the underlying referenced credit. Where external ratings by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations (such as Moody's and S&P), are used, investment grade ratings are considered to be Baa/BBB or above, while anything below is considered non-investment grade. The Citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external credit rating system. On certain underlying referenced credit,reference credits, mainly related to over-the-counter credit derivatives, ratings are not available, and these are included in the not-rated category. Credit derivatives written on an underlying non-investment grade referencedreference credit represent greater payment risk to the Company. The non-investment grade category in the table above primarily includes credit derivatives where the underlying referenced entity has been downgraded subsequent to the inception of the derivative.

                  The maximum potential amount of future payments under credit derivative contracts presented in the table above is based on the notional value of the derivatives. The Company believes that the maximum potential amount of future payments for credit protection sold is not representative of the actual loss exposure based on historical experience. This amount has not been reduced by the Company's rights to the underlying assets and the related cash flows. In accordance with most credit derivative contracts, should a credit event (or settlement trigger) occur, the Company is usually liable for the difference between the protection sold and the recourse it holds in the value of the underlying assets. Thus, if the reference entity defaults, Citi will generally have a right to collect on the underlying reference credit and any related cash flows, while being liable for the full notional amount of credit protection sold to the buyer. Furthermore, this maximum potential amount of future payments for credit protection sold has not been reduced for any cash collateral paid to a given counterparty, as such payments would be calculated after netting all derivative exposures, including any credit derivatives with that counterparty in accordance with a related master netting agreement. Due to such netting processes, determining the amount of collateral that corresponds to credit derivative exposures only is not possible. The Company actively monitors open credit risk exposures, and manages this exposure by using a variety of strategies including purchased credit derivatives, cash collateral or direct holdings of the referenced assets. This risk mitigation activity is not captured in the table above.

          Credit-Risk-Related Contingent Features in Derivatives

                  Certain derivative instruments contain provisions that require the Company to either post additional collateral or immediately settle any outstanding liability balances upon the occurrence of a specified credit risk-relatedcredit-risk-related event. These events, which are defined by the existing derivative contracts, are primarily downgrades in the credit ratings of the Company and its affiliates. The fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a liability position at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 is $21 billion.$28 billion and $17 billion, respectively. The Company has posted $13$22 billion and $11 billion as collateral for this exposure in the normal course of business as of September 30, 2009.2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Each downgrade would trigger additional collateral requirements for the Company and its affiliates. However, inIn the event that each legal entity was downgraded to below investment grade credit ratinga single notch as of September 30, 2009,2010, the Company would be required to post additional collateral of up to $5$2.1 billion.


          Table of Contents


          17.    FAIR-VALUE16.    FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT

                  Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adoptedSFAS 157 (now ASC 820-10 (SFAS 157). ASC 820-10 (SFAS 157)820-10) defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair-valuefair value measurements. Among other things, the standard requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. In addition, it precludes the use of block discounts when measuring the fair value of instruments traded in an active market; such discounts were previously applied to large holdings of publicly traded equity securities. It alsomarket, and requires recognition of trade-date gains related to certain derivative transactions whose fair value has been determined using unobservable market inputs.

                  This guidance supersedes the guidance in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-3, "Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts Held for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities" (EITF Issue 02-3), which prohibited the recognition of trade-date gains for such derivative transactions when determining the fair value of instruments not traded in an active market.

                  As a result of the adoption of the standard the Company made some amendments to the techniques used in measuring the fair value of derivative and other positions. These amendments change the wayalso requires that the probability of default of a counterparty is factored into the valuation of derivative positions, include for the first time the impact of Citigroup's own credit risk on derivatives and other liabilities measured at fair value and also eliminatebe factored into the portfolio servicing adjustment that is no longer necessary.valuation.

          Fair-ValueFair Value Hierarchy

                  ASC 820-10 (SFAS 157) also specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company's market assumptions. These two types of inputs have created the following fair-value hierarchy:

            Level 1—1: Quoted prices foridentical instruments in active markets.

            Level 2—2: Quoted prices forsimilar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers areobservable in active markets.

            Level 3—3: Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers areunobservable.unobservable.

                  This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available. The Company considers relevant and observable market prices in its valuations where possible. The frequency of transactions, the size of the bid-ask spread and the amount of adjustment necessary when comparing similar transactions are all factors in determining the liquidity of markets and the relevance of observed prices in those markets.

                  The Company's policy with respect to transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy is to recognize transfers into and out of each level as of the end of the reporting period.

          Determination of Fair Value

                  For assets and liabilities carried at fair value, the Company measures such value using the procedures set out below, irrespective of whether these assets and liabilities are carried at fair value as a result of an election or whether they were previously carried at fair value.

                  When available, the Company generally uses quoted market prices to determine fair value and classifies such items inas Level 1. In some cases where a market price is available, the Company will make use of acceptable practical expedients (such as matrix pricing) to calculate fair value, in which case the items are classified inas Level 2.

                  If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed valuation techniques that use, where possible, current market-based or independently sourced market parameters, such as interest rates, currency rates, option volatilities, etc. Items valued using such internally generated valuation techniques are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation. Thus, an item may be classified in Level 3 even though there may be some significant inputs that are readily observable.

                  Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in positions with the same or similar characteristics to that being valued. The frequency and size of transactions and the amount of the bid-ask spread are among the factors considered in determining the liquidity of markets and the relevance of observed prices from those markets. If relevant and observable prices are available, those valuations would be classified as Level 2. If prices are not available, other valuation techniques would be used and the item would be classified as Level 3.

                  Fair-valueFair value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors or brokers. Vendors and brokers' valuations may be based on a variety of inputs ranging from observed prices to proprietary valuation models.

                  The following section describes the valuation methodologies used by the Company to measure various financial instruments at fair value, including an indication of the level in the fair-valuefair value hierarchy in which each instrument is generally classified. Where appropriate, the description includes details of the valuation models, the key inputs to those models as well as any significant assumptions.

          Securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase

                  No quoted prices exist for such instruments and so fair value is determined using a discounted cash-flow technique. Cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the contract, taking into account any embedded derivative or other features. Expected cash flows are discounted using market rates appropriate to the maturity of the instrument as well as the nature and amount of collateral taken or received. Generally, such instruments are


          Table of Contents

          classified within Level 2 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy as the inputs used in the fair valuation are readily observable.


          Table of Contents

          Trading Account Assetsaccount assets and Liabilities—Trading Securitiesliabilities—trading securities and Trading Loanstrading loans

                  When available, the Company uses quoted market prices to determine the fair value of trading securities; such items are classified inas Level 1 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy. Examples include some government securities and exchange-traded equity securities.

                  For bonds and secondary market loans traded over the counter, the Company generally determines fair value utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair-valueFair value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources and may apply matrix pricing for similar bonds or loans where no price is observable. If available, the Company may also use quoted prices for recent trading activity of assets with similar characteristics to the bond or loan being valued. Trading securities and loans priced using such methods are generally classified as Level 2. However, when less liquidity exists for a security or loan, a quoted price is stale or prices from independent sources vary, a loan or security is generally classified as Level 3.

                  Where the Company's principal market for a portfolio of loans is the securitization market, the Company uses the securitization price to determine the fair value of the portfolio. The securitization price is determined from the assumed proceeds of a hypothetical securitization in the current market, adjusted for transformation costs (i.e., direct costs other than transaction costs) and securitization uncertainties such as market conditions and liquidity. As a result of the severe reduction in the level of activity in certain securitization markets since the second half of 2007, observable securitization prices for certain directly comparable portfolios of loans have not been readily available. Therefore, such portfolios of loans are generally classified inas Level 3 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy. However, for other loan securitization markets, such as those related to conforming prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate mortgage loans, pricing verification of the hypothetical securitizations has been possible, since these markets have remained active. Accordingly, these loan portfolios are classified as Level 2 in the fair-valuefair value hierarchy.

          Trading Account Assetsaccount assets and Liabilities—Derivativesliabilities—derivatives

                  Exchange-traded derivatives are generally fair valued using quoted market (i.e., exchange) prices and so are classified inas Level 1 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy.

                  The majority of derivatives entered into by the Company are executed over the counter and so are valued using internal valuation techniques as no quoted market prices exist for such instruments. The valuation techniques and inputs depend on the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument. The principal techniques used to value these instruments are discounted cash flows, Black-Scholes and Monte Carlo simulation. The fair values of derivative contracts reflect cash the Company has paid or received (for example, option premiums paid and received).

                  The key inputs depend upon the type of derivative and the nature of the underlying instrument and include interest rate yield curves, foreign-exchange rates, the spot price of the underlying volatility and correlation. The item is placed in either Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of the significant inputs to the model. Correlation and items with longer tenors are generally less observable.

          Subprime-Related Direct ExposuresSubprime-related direct exposures in CDOs

                  The Company accounts for its CDO super senior subprime direct exposures and the underlying securities on a fair-value basis with all changes in fair value recorded in earnings. Citigroup's CDO super senior subprime direct exposures are not subject to valuation based on observable transactions. Accordingly, the fair value of these exposures is based on management's best estimates based on facts and circumstances as of the date of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

                  Citigroup's CDO super senior subprime direct exposures are Level 3 assets. The valuation of the high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO positions uses trader prices based on the underlying assets of each high-grade and mezzanine ABS CDO. Unlike the ABCP and CDO-squared positions, theThe high-grade and mezzanine positions are now largely hedged through the ABX and bond short positions, which are by necessity, trader priced. This results in closer symmetry in the way these long and short positions are valued by the Company. Citigroup intends to use trader marks to value this portion of the portfolio going forward so long as it remains largely hedged.

                  The valuation of the ABCP and CDO-squared positions are subject to valuation based on significant unobservable inputs. Fair value of these exposures is based on estimates of future cash flows from the mortgage loans underlying the assets of the ABS CDOs. To determine the performance of the underlying mortgage loan portfolios, the Company estimates the prepayments, defaults and loss severities based on a number of macroeconomic factors, including housing price changes, unemployment rates, interest rates and borrower and loan attributes, such as age, credit scores, documentation status, loan-to-value (LTV) ratios and debt-to-income (DTI) ratios. The model is calibrated using available mortgage loan information including historical loan performance. In addition, the methodology estimates the impact of geographic concentration of mortgages and the impact of reported fraud in the origination of subprime mortgages. An appropriate discount rate is then applied to the cash flows generated for each ABCP and CDO-squared tranche, in order to estimate its fair value under current market conditions.

                  When necessary, the valuation methodology used by Citigroup is refined and the inputs used for the purposes of estimation are modified, in part, to reflect ongoing market developments. More specifically, the inputs of home price appreciation (HPA) assumptions and delinquency data were updated along with discount rates that are based upon a weighted average combination of implied spreads from single name ABS bond prices and ABX indices, as well as CLO spreads under current market conditions.

                  The housing-price changes were estimated using a forward-looking projection, which incorporated the Loan Performance Index. In addition, the Company's mortgage default model also


          Table of Contents

          uses recent mortgage performance data, a period of sharp home price declines and high levels of mortgage foreclosures.

                  The valuation as of September 30, 2009 assumes a cumulative decline in U.S. housing prices from peak to trough of 30.5%. This rate assumes declines of 10% in 2009 and flat in 2010, respectively, the remainder of the 30.5% decline having already occurred before the end of 2008.

                  In addition, the discount rates were based on a weighted average combination of the implied spreads from single name ABS bond prices, ABX indices and CLO spreads, depending on vintage and asset types. To determine the discount margin, the Company applies the mortgage default model to the bonds underlying the ABX indices and other referenced cash bonds and solves for the discount margin that produces the current market prices of those instruments.

                  The primary drivers that currently impact the super senior valuations are the discount rates used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows and projected mortgage loan performance.

          For most of the lending and structuring direct subprime exposures, (excluding super seniors), fair value is determined utilizing observable transactions where available, other market data for similar assets in markets that are not active and other internal valuation techniques.

          Investments

                  The investments category includes available-for-sale debt and marketable equity securities, whose fair value is determined using the same procedures described for trading securities above or, in some cases, using vendor prices as the primary source.

                  Also included in investments are nonpublic investments in private equity and real estate entities held by theS&B business. Determining the fair value of nonpublic securities involves a significant degree of management resources and judgment as no quoted prices exist and such securities are generally very thinly traded. In addition, there may be transfer restrictions on private equity securities. The Company uses an established process for determining the fair value of such securities, using commonly accepted valuation techniques, including the use of earnings multiples based on comparable public securities, industry-specific non-earnings-based multiples and discounted cash flow models. In determining the fair value of nonpublic securities, the Company also considers events such as a proposed sale of the investee company, initial public offerings, equity issuances, or other observable transactions.

                  Private equity securities are generally classified inas Level 3 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy.

          Short-Term BorrowingsShort-term borrowings and Long-Term Debtlong-term debt

                  Where fair-valuefair value accounting has been elected, the fair value of non-structured liabilities is determined by discounting expected cash flows using the appropriate discount rate for the applicable maturity. Such instruments are generally classified inas Level 2 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy as all inputs are readily observable.

                  The Company determines the fair value of structured liabilities (where performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation or currency risks) and hybrid financial instruments (performance linked to risks other than interest rates, inflation or currency risks) using the appropriate derivative valuation methodology (described above) given the nature of the embedded risk profile. Such instruments are classified inas Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the observability of significant inputs to the model.


          Table of Contents

          Market Valuation Adjustmentsvaluation adjustments

                  Liquidity adjustments are applied to items in Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair-valuefair value hierarchy to ensure that the fair value reflects the price at which the entire position could be liquidated. The liquidity reserve is based on the bid-offer spread for an instrument, adjusted to take into account the size of the position.

                  Counterparty credit-risk adjustments are applied to derivatives, such as over-the-counter derivatives, where the base valuation uses market parameters based on the LIBOR interest rate curves. Not all counterparties have the same credit risk as that implied by the relevant LIBOR curve, so it is necessary to consider the market view of the credit risk of a counterparty in order to estimate the fair value of such an item.

                  Bilateral or "own" credit-risk adjustments are applied to reflect the Company's own credit risk when valuing derivatives and liabilities measured at fair value. Counterparty and own credit adjustments consider the expected future cash flows between Citi and its counterparties under the terms of the instrument and the effect of credit risk on the valuation of those cash flows, rather than a point-in-time assessment of the current recognized net asset or liability. Furthermore, the credit-risk adjustments take into account the effect of credit-risk mitigants, such as pledged collateral and any legal right of offset (to the extent such offset exists) with a counterparty through arrangements such as netting agreements.

          Auction Rate Securitiesrate securities

                  Auction rate securities (ARS) are long-term municipal bonds, corporate bonds, securitizations and preferred stocks with interest rates or dividend yields that are reset through periodic auctions. The coupon paid in the current period is based on the rate determined by the prior auction. In the event of an auction failure, ARS holders receive a "fail rate" coupon, which is specified by the original issue documentation of each ARS.

                  Where insufficient orders to purchase all of the ARS issue to be sold in an auction were received, the primary dealer or auction agent would traditionally have purchased any residual unsold inventory (without a contractual obligation to do so). This residual inventory would then be repaid through subsequent auctions, typically in a short timeframe. Due to this auction mechanism and generally liquid market, ARS have historically traded and were valued as short-term instruments.

                  Citigroup acted in the capacity of primary dealer for approximately $72 billion of ARS and continued to purchase residual unsold inventory in support of the auction mechanism until mid-February 2008. After this date, liquidity in the ARS market deteriorated significantly, auctions failed due to a lack of bids from third-party investors and Citigroup ceased to purchase unsold inventory. Following a number of ARS refinancings, at September 30, 2009,2010, Citigroup continued to act in the capacity of primary dealer for approximately $31.5$24.7 billion of outstanding ARS.

                  The Company classifies its ARS as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale and trading securities.


          Table of Contents

                  Prior to ourthe Company's first auction's failing in the first quarter of 2008, Citigroup valued ARS based on observation of auction market prices, because the auctions had a short maturity period (7, 28 and 35 days). This generally resulted in valuations at par. Once the auctions failed, ARS could no longer be valued using observation of auction market prices. Accordingly, the fair value of ARS is currently estimated using internally developed discounted cash flow valuation techniques specific to the nature of the assets underlying each ARS.

                  For ARS with U.S. municipal securities as underlying assets, future cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the securities underlying each individual ARS and discounted at an estimated discount rate in order to estimate the current fair value. The key assumptions that impact the ARS valuations are estimated prepayments and refinancings, estimated fail rate coupons (i.e., the rate paid in the event of auction failure, which varies according to the current credit rating of the issuer) and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows. The discount rate used for each ARS is based on rates observed for straight issuances of other municipal securities. In order to arrive at the appropriate discount rate, these observed rates were adjusted upward to factor in the specifics of the ARS structure being valued, such as callability, and the illiquidity in the ARS market.

                  For ARS with student loans as underlying assets, future cash flows are estimated based on the terms of the loans underlying each individual ARS, discounted at an appropriate rate in order to estimate the current fair value. The key assumptions that impact the ARS valuations are the expected weighted average life of the structure, estimated fail rate coupons, the amount of leverage in each structure and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of projected cash flows. The discount rate used for each ARS is based on rates observed for basic securitizations with similar maturities to the loans underlying each ARS being valued. In order to arrive at the appropriate discount rate, these observed rates were adjusted upward to factor in the specifics of the ARS structure being valued, such as callability, and the illiquidity in the ARS market.

                  During the first quarter of 2008, ARS for which the auctions failed and where no secondary market has developed were moved to Level 3, as the assets were subject to valuation using significant unobservable inputs. The majority of ARS continue to be classified inas Level 3.

          Alt-A Mortgage Securitiesmortgage securities

                  The Company classifies its Alt-A mortgage securities as held-to-maturity, available-for-sale and trading investments. The securities classified as trading and available-for-sale are recorded at fair value with changes in fair value reported in current earnings and AOCI, respectively. For these purposes, Alt-A mortgage securities are non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) where (1) the underlying collateral has weighted average FICO scores between 680 and 720 or (2) for instances where FICO scores are greater than 720, RMBS have 30% or less of the underlying collateral composed of full documentation loans.

                  Similar to the valuation methodologies used for other trading securities and trading loans, the Company generally determines the fair value of Alt-A mortgage securities utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair-value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources. Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in securities with the same or similar characteristics to that being valued.

                  The internal valuation techniques used for Alt-A mortgage securities, as with other mortgage exposures,


          Table of Contents

          consider estimated housing price changes, unemployment rates, interest rates and borrower attributes. They also consider prepayment rates as well as other market indicators.

                  Alt-A mortgage securities that are valued using these methods are generally classified as Level 2. However, Alt-A mortgage securities backed by Alt-A mortgages of lower quality or more recent vintages are mostly classified inas Level 3 due to the reduced liquidity that exists for such positions, which reduces the reliability of prices available from independent sources.

          Commercial Real Estate Exposurereal estate exposure

                  Citigroup reports a number of different exposures linked to commercial real estate at fair value with changes in fair value reported in earnings, including securities, loans and investments in entities that hold commercial real estate loans or commercial real estate directly. The Company also reports securities backed by commercial real estate asAvailable-for-sale available-for-sale investments,, which are carried at fair value with changes in fair-value reported in AOCI.

                  Similar to the valuation methodologies used for other trading securities and trading loans, the Company generally determines the fair value of securities and loans linked to commercial real estate utilizing internal valuation techniques. Fair-value estimates from internal valuation techniques are verified, where possible, to prices obtained from independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources. Where available, the Company may also make use of quoted prices for recent trading activity in securities or loans with the same or similar characteristics to thatthose being valued. Securities and loans linked to commercial real estate valued using these methodologies are generally classified as Level 3 as a result of the reduced liquidity currently in the market for such exposures.

                  The fair value of investments in entities that hold commercial real estate loans or commercial real estate directly is determined using a similar methodology to that used for other non-public investments in real estate held by theS&B business. The Company uses an established process for determining the fair value of such securities, using commonly accepted valuation techniques, including the use of earnings multiples based on comparable public securities, industry-specific non-earnings-based multiples and discounted cash flow models. In determining the fair value of such investments, the Company also considers events, such as a proposed sale of the investee company, initial public offerings, equity issuances, or other observable transactions. Such investments are generally classified inas Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy.


          Table of Contents

          Highly Leveraged Financing Commitments

                  The Company reports approximately $900 million of highly leveraged loans as held for sale, which are measured on a LOCOM basis. The fair value of such exposures is determined, where possible, using quoted secondary-market prices and classified in Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy if there is a sufficient level of activity in the market and quotes or traded prices are available with suitable frequency.

                  However, due to the dislocation of the credit markets and the reduced market interest in higher risk/higher yield instruments since the latter half of 2007, liquidity in the market for highly leveraged financings has been limited. Therefore, a majority of such exposures are classified in Level 3 as quoted secondary market prices do not generally exist. The fair value for such exposures is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of the loan being valued.


          Table of Contents

          Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

                  The following tables present for each of the fair-value hierarchy levels the Company's assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.basis. The Company often hedges positions that have been classified in the Level 3 category with financial instruments that have been classified as Level 1 or Level 2. In addition, the Company also hedges items classified in the Level 3 category with instruments classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The effects of these hedges are presented gross in the following table.tables, as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

          In millions of dollars at September 30, 2009 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
          inventory
           Netting(1) Net
          balance
           
          In millions of dollars at September 30, 2010In millions of dollars at September 30, 2010 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
          inventory
           Netting(1) Net
          balance
           

          Assets

          Assets

           

          Assets

           

          Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

          Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

           $ $114,841 $ $114,841 $(26,955)$87,886 

          Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

           $ $127,104 $8,180 $135,284 $(41,094)$94,190 

          Trading securities

          Trading securities

           

          Trading securities

           

          Trading mortgage-backed securities

           

          Trading mortgage-backed securities

           
           

          U.S. government sponsored

            $22,387 $1,162 $23,549 $ $23,549  

          U.S. government sponsored

           $ $22,937 $845 $23,782 $ $23,782 
           

          Prime

            719 458 1,177  1,177  

          Prime

            907 891 1,798  1,798 
           

          Alt-A

            743 562 1,305  1,305  

          Alt-A

            1,065 351 1,416  1,416 
           

          Subprime

            880 9,758 10,638  10,638  

          Subprime

            501 1,353 1,854  1,854 
           

          Non-U.S. residential

            1,633 290 1,923  1,923  

          Non-U.S. residential

            2,488 341 2,829  2,829 
           

          Commercial

            1,244 2,731 3,975  3,975  

          Commercial

            1,749 1,547 3,296  3,296 
                                     

          Total trading mortgage-backed securities

           $ $27,606 $14,961 $42,567 $ $42,567 

          Total trading mortgage-backed securities

           $ $29,647 $5,328 $34,975 $ $34,975 
                                     
           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           
           

          U.S. Treasury

           $20,527 $276 $ $20,803 $ $20,803  

          U.S. Treasury

           $21,345 $2,440 $ $23,785 $ $23,785 
           

          Agency obligations

            3,854 79 3,933  3,933  

          Agency obligations

            4,108 65 4,173  4,173 
                                     

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           $20,527 $4,130 $79 $24,736 $ $24,736 

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           $21,345 $6,548 $65 $27,958 $ $27,958 
                                     

          Other trading securities

           

          State and municipal

           $ $6,424 $305 $6,729 $ $6,729 

          State and municipal

           $ $6,744 $452 $7,196  $7,196 

          Foreign government

           73,828 23,948 424 98,200  98,200 

          Foreign government

           48,200 17,781 444 66,425  66,425 

          Corporate

            45,617 6,372 51,989  51,989 

          Corporate

            38,856 8,629 47,485  47,485 

          Equity securities

           30,414 5,852 851 37,117  37,117 

          Equity securities

           34,989 10,319 1,155 46,463  46,463 

          Asset-backed securities

            2,178 7,503 9,681  9,681 

          Other debt securities

            20,789 16,366 37,155  37,155 

          Other debt securities

            13,796 1,093 14,889  14,889 
                                     

          Total trading securities

           $103,716 $126,225 $42,086 $272,027 $ $272,027 
                       

          Derivatives

           $4,977 $786,659 $30,466 $822,102 $(753,432)$68,670 
                       

          Investments

           

          Mortgage-backed securities

           

          Total trading securities

           $125,587 $134,010 $21,941 $281,538 $ $281,538 
           

          U.S. government sponsored

           $1,387 $22,232 $ $23,619 $ $23,619               
           

          Prime

            5,405 873 6,278  6,278 

          Derivatives

           
           

          Alt-A

            403 67 470  470  

          Interest rate contracts

           $572 $666,648 $2,690 $669,910     
           

          Subprime

             19 19  19  

          Foreign exchange contracts

           5 98,837 1,091 99,933     
           

          Non-U.S. Residential

            266  266  266  

          Equity contracts

           2,764 14,438 2,355 19,557     
           

          Commercial

            45 764 809  809  

          Commodity and other contracts

           559 12,580 1,020 14,159     
                        

          Credit derivatives

           10 60,538 12,638 73,186     

          Total investment mortgage-backed securities

           $1,387 $28,351 $1,723 $31,461 $ $31,461             
                       

          Total gross derivatives

           $3,910 $853,041 $19,794 $876,745     

          U.S. Treasury and federal Agency securities

           

          Cash collateral paid

                 61,457     
           

          U.S. Treasury

           $4,599 $1,635 $ $6,234 $ $6,234 

          Netting agreements and market value adjustments

                   $(882,642)   
           

          Agency obligations

            16,963 4 16,967  16,967               
                       

          Total derivatives

           $3,910 $853,041 $19,794 $938,202 $(882,642)$55,560 

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency

           $4,599 $18,598 $4 $23,201 $ $23,201               

          Investments

          Investments

           
                       

          Mortgage-backed securities

           

          State and municipal

           $ $16,571 $254 $16,825 $ $16,825  

          U.S. government sponsored

           $77 $22,679 $1 $22,757 $ 22,757 

          Foreign government

           37,313 43,087 271 80,671  80,671  

          Prime

            2,258 233 2,491  2,491 

          Corporate

            19,303 1,405 20,708  20,708  

          Alt-A

            49 22 71  71 

          Equity securities

           3,088 109 2,542 5,739  5,739  

          Subprime

            1  1  1 

          Other debt securities

           553 2,492 8,602 11,647  11,647  

          Non-U.S. residential

            340  340  340 

          Non-marketable equity securities

            119 7,646 7,765  7,765  

          Commercial

            45 551 596  596 
                                     

          Total investments

           $46,940 $128,630 $22,447 $198,017 $ $198,017 
                       

           

          Table of Contents

          In millions of dollars at September 30, 2009 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
          inventory
           Netting(1) Net
          balance
           
          In millions of dollars at September 30, 2010In millions of dollars at September 30, 2010 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
          inventory
           Netting(1) Net
          balance
           

          Total investment mortgage-backed securities

           $77 $25,372 $807 $26,256 $ $26,256 
                       

          U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

           
           

          U.S. Treasury

           $13,783 $52,114 $ $65,897 $ $65,897 
           

          Agency obligations

            49,128 18 49,146   49,146 
                       

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency

           $13,783 $101,242 $18 $115,043 $ $115,043 
                       

          State and municipal

           $ $14,566 $ $14,566 $ $14,566 

          Foreign government

           52,423 51,093 339 103,855  103,855 

          Corporate

            16,687 911 17,598  17,598 

          Equity securities

           3,782 85 2,126 5,993  5,993 

          Asset-backed securities

            3,071 7,159 10,230  10,230 

          Other debt securities

            1,216 925 2,141  2,141 

          Non-marketable equity securities

            137 6,290 6,427  6,427 
                       

          Total investments

          Total investments

           $70,065 $213,469 $18,575 $302,109 $ $302,109 
                       

          Loans(2)

          Loans(2)

            $1,290 $215 $1,505  $1,505 

          Loans(2)

           $ $1,234 $3,921 $5,155 $ $5,155 

          Mortgage servicing rights

             6,228 6,228  6,228 

          Assets of discontinued operations held for sale(3)

           5,961 2,516 727 9,204  9,204 

          MSRs

          MSRs

             3,976 3,976  3,976 

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

            17,199 1,184 18,383 (4,713)$13,670 

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

            24,441 2,698 27,139 (4,221) 22,918 
                                     

          Total assets

          Total assets

           $161,594 $1,177,360 $103,353 $1,442,307 $(785,100)$657,207 

          Total assets

           $199,562 $1,353,299 $79,085 $1,693,403 $(927,957)$765,446 

           11.2% 81.6% 7.2% 100.0%     

          Total as a percentage of gross assets(3)

          Total as a percentage of gross assets(3)

           12.2% 82.9% 4.9% 100.0%     
                                     

          Liabilities

          Liabilities

           

          Liabilities

           

          Interest-bearing deposits

          Interest-bearing deposits

           $ $1,998 $31 $2,029 $ $2,029 

          Interest-bearing deposits

           $ $1,009 $161 $1,170 $ $1,170 

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

            135,165 8,483 143,648 (26,955) 116,693 

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

            159,668 1,410 161,078 (41,094) 119,984 

          Trading account liabilities

          Trading account liabilities

           

          Trading account liabilities

           

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

           43,864 22,905 1,219 67,988  67,988 

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

           65,878 12,878 783 79,539  79,539 

          Derivatives

           5,601 772,149 29,934 807,684 (745,132) 62,552 

          Derivatives

           
           

          Interest rate contracts

           595 663,663 2,457 666,715     
           

          Foreign exchange contracts

           1 106,210 960 107,171     
           

          Equity contracts

           3,222 30,931 3,596 37,749     
           

          Commodity and other contracts

           447 12,597 1,819 14,863     
           

          Credit derivatives

            56,277 10,908 67,185     
                     

          Total gross derivatives

           $4,265 $869,678 $19,740 893,683     

          Cash collateral received

                 46,590     

          Netting agreements and market value adjustments

                   (877,807)   
                       

          Total derivatives

           $4,265 $869,678 $19,740 $940,273 $(877,807)$62,466 

          Short-term borrowings

          Short-term borrowings

            1,284 159 1,443  1,443 

          Short-term borrowings

            1,677 817 2,494  2,494 

          Long-term debt

          Long-term debt

            16,080 11,106 27,186  27,186 

          Long-term debt

            16,108 10,532 26,640  26,640 

          Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale(3)

           1,302 1,521  2,823  2,823 

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

            19,531 1 19,532 (4,713) 14,819 

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

           1 15,507  15,508 (4,221) 11,287 
                                     

          Total liabilities

          Total liabilities

           $50,767 $970,633 $50,933 $1,072,333 $(776,800)$295,533 

          Total liabilities

           $70,144 $1,076,525 $33,443 $1,226,702 $(923,122)$303,580 

          Total as a percentage of gross liabilities(3)

          Total as a percentage of gross liabilities(3)

           6.0% 91.2% 2.8% 100.0%     

           4.7% 90.6% 4.7% 100.0%                   
                       

          (1)
          Represents netting of: (i) the amounts due under securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and (ii) derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement, cash collateral and the market value adjustment.

          (2)
          There is no allowance for loan losses recorded for loans reported at fair value.

          (3)
          Represents thePercentage is calculated based on total assets and liabilities of Nikko Cordial businesses sold that are measured at fair value. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Discontinued Operations," for further discussion.excluding collateral received/paid on derivatives.

          Table of Contents

          In millions of dollars at December 31, 2008 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
          inventory
           Netting(1) Net
          balance
           

          Assets

                             

          Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

           $ $96,524 $ $96,524 $(26,219)$70,305 

          Trading account assets

                             
           

          Trading securities and loans

            90,530  121,043  50,773  262,346    262,346 
           

          Derivatives

            9,675  1,102,252  60,725  1,172,652  (1,057,363) 115,289 

          Investments

            44,342  111,836  28,273  184,451    184,451 

          Loans(2)

              2,572  160  2,732    2,732 

          Mortgage servicing rights

                5,657  5,657    5,657 

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

              25,540  359  25,899  (4,527) 21,372 
                        

          Total assets

           $144,547 $1,459,767 $145,947 $1,750,261 $(1,088,109)$662,152 

            8.3% 83.4% 8.3% 100.0%      
                        

          Liabilities

                             

          Interest-bearing deposits

           $ $2,552 $54 $2,606 $ $2,606 

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

              153,918  11,167  165,085  (26,219) 138,866 

          Trading account liabilities

                             
           

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

            36,848  13,192  653  50,693    50,693 
           

          Derivatives

            10,038  1,094,435  57,139  1,161,612  (1,046,505) 115,107 

          Short-term borrowings

              16,278  1,329  17,607    17,607 

          Long-term debt

              16,065  11,198  27,263    27,263 

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

              18,093  1  18,094  (4,527) 13,567 
                        

          Total liabilities

           $46,886 $1,314,533 $81,541 $1,442,960 $(1,077,251)$365,709 

            3.2% 91.1% 5.7% 100.0%      
                        
          In millions of dollars at December 31, 2009 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
          inventory
           Netting(1) Net
          balance
           

          ASSETS

                             

          Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

           $ $138,525 $ $138,525 $(50,713)$87,812 

          Trading securities

                             
           

          Trading mortgage- backed securities

                             
            

          U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed

           $ $19,666 $972 $20,638 $ $20,638 
            

          Prime

              772  384  1,156    1,156 
            

          Alt-A

              842  387  1,229    1,229 
            

          Subprime

              736  8,998  9,734    9,734 
            

          Non-U.S. residential

              1,796  572  2,368    2,368 
            

          Commercial

              1,004  2,451  3,455    3,455 
                        
           

          Total trading mortgage-backed securities

           $ $24,816 $13,764 $38,580 $ $38,580 
                        
           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                             
            

          U.S. Treasury

           $27,943 $995 $ $28,938 $ $28,938 
            

          Agency obligations

              2,041   $2,041    2,041 
                        
           

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           $27,943 $3,036 $ $30,979 $ $30,979 
                        
           

          Other trading securities

                             
           

          State and municipal

           $ $6,925 $222 $7,147 $ $7,147 
           

          Foreign government

            59,229  13,081  459  72,769    72,769 
           

          Corporate

              43,365  8,620  51,985    51,985 
           

          Equity securities

            33,754  11,827  640  46,221    46,221 
           

          Other debt securities

              19,976  16,237  36,213    36,213 
                        

          Total trading securities

           $120,926 $123,026 $39,942 $283,894 $ $283,894 
                        

          Total derivatives(2)

           $4,002 $671,532 $27,685 $703,219 $(644,340)$58,879 
                        

          Investments

                             
           

          Mortgage-backed securities

                             
            

          U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed

           $89 $20,823 $2 $20,914 $ $20,914 
            

          Prime

              5,742  736  6,478    6,478 
            

          Alt-A

              572  55  627    627 
            

          Subprime

                1  1    1 
            

          Non-U.S. residential

              255    255    255 
            

          Commercial

              47  746  793    793 
                        
           

          Total investment mortgage-backed securities

           $89 $27,439 $1,540 $29,068 $ $29,068 
                        
           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agency securities

                             
            

          U.S. Treasury

           $5,943 $20,619 $ $26,562 $ $26,562 
            

          Agency obligations

              27,531  21  27,552    27,552 
                        
           

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agency

           $5,943 $48,150 $21 $54,114 $ $54,114 
                        
           

          State and municipal

           $ $15,393 $217 $15,610 $ $15,610 
           

          Foreign government

            60,484  41,765  270  102,519    102,519 
           

          Corporate

              19,056  1,257  20,313    20,313 
           

          Equity securities

            3,056  237  2,513  5,806    5,806 
           

          Other debt securities

              3,337  8,832  12,169    12,169 
           

          Non-marketable equity securities

              77  6,753  6,830    6,830 
                        

          Total investments

           $69,572 $155,454 $21,403 $246,429 $ $246,429 
                        

          Loans(3)

           $ $1,226 $213 $1,439 $ $1,439 

          Table of Contents

          In millions of dollars at December 31, 2009 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Gross
          inventory
           Netting(1) Net
          balance
           

          MSRs

                6,530  6,530    6,530 

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

              15,787  1,101  16,888  (4,224) 12,664 
                        

          Total assets

           $194,500 $1,105,550 $96,874 $1,396,924 $(699,277)$697,647 

            13.9% 79.2% 6.9% 100.0%      
                        

          LIABILITIES

                             

          Interest-bearing deposits

           $ $1,517 $28 $1,545 $ $1,545 

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

              152,687  2,056  154,743  (50,713) 104,030 

          Trading account liabilities

                             
           

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

            52,399  20,233  774  73,406    73,406 
           

          Derivatives(2)

            4,980  669,384  24,577  698,941  (634,835) 64,106 

          Short-term borrowings

              408  231  639    639 

          Long-term debt

              16,288  9,654  25,942    25,942 

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

              15,753  13  15,766  (4,224) 11,542 
                        

          Total liabilities

           $57,379 $876,270 $37,333 $970,982 $(689,772)$281,210 

            5.9% 90.2% 3.8% 100.0%      
                        

          (1)
          Represents netting of: (i) the amounts due under securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and (ii) derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement, cash collateral, and the market value adjustment.

          (2)
          Cash collateral paid/received is included in Level 2 derivative assets/liabilities, as it is primarily related to derivative positions classified in Level 2.

          (3)
          There is no allowance for loan losses recorded for loans reported at fair value.

          Table of Contents

          Changes in Level 3 Fair-Value Category

                  The following tables present the changes in the Level 3 fair-value category for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008.category. The Company classifies financial instruments in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy when there is reliance on at least one significant unobservable input to the valuation model. In addition to these unobservable inputs, the valuation models for Level 3 financial instruments typically also rely on a number of inputs that are readily observable either directly or indirectly. Thus, the gains and losses presented below include changes in the fair value related to both observable and unobservable inputs.

                  The Company often hedges positions with offsetting positions that are classified in a different level. For example, the gains and losses for assets and liabilities in the Level 3 category presented in the tables below do not reflect the effect of offsetting losses and gains on hedging instruments that have been classified by the Company in the Level 1 and Level 2 categories. In addition, the Company hedges items classified in the Level 3 category with instruments also classified in Level 3 of the fair-value hierarchy. The effects of these hedges are presented gross in the following tables.



            
           Net realized/ unrealized
          gains (losses) included in
            
            
            
            
           
            
           Net realized/ unrealized
          gains (losses) included in
            
            
            
            
           


            
           Transfers
          in and/or
          out of
          Level 3
           Purchases,
          issuances
          and
          settlements
            
           Unrealized
          gains
          (losses)
          still held(3)
           
            
           Transfers
          in and/or
          out of
          Level 3
           Purchases,
          issuances
          and
          settlements
            
           Unrealized
          gains
          (losses)
          still held(3)
           
          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars June 30,
          2009
           Principal
          transactions
           Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
          2009
           In millions of dollars June 30,
          2010
           Principal
          transactions
           Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
          2010
           

          Assets

          Assets

           

          Assets

           

          Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

          Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

           $6,518 $ $ $1,714 $(52)$8,180 $ 

          Trading securities

          Trading securities

           

          Trading securities

           

          Trading mortgage-backed securities

           
           

          U.S. government sponsored

           $1,244 $(71)$ $127 $(138)$1,162 $(116)
           

          Prime

           623 (76)  (39) (50) 458 (37)
           

          Alt-A

           777 18  (75) (158) 562 18 
           

          Subprime

           10,001 1,752  (515) (1,480) 9,758 1,785 

          Trading mortgage-backed securities

           
           

          Non-U.S. residential

           345 (3)  (142) 90 290 (3) 

          U.S. government sponsored

           $758 (62)  160 (11)$845 (75)
           

          Commercial

           2,808 (1)  114 (190) 2,731 2  

          Prime

           610 23  188 70 891 3 
                          

          Alt-A

           451 15  41 (156) 351 (6)

          Total trading mortgage-backed securities

           $15,798 $1,619 $ $(530)$(1,926)$14,961 $1,649  

          Subprime

           1,885 146  24 (702) 1,353 29 
                          

          Non-U.S. residential

           234 29  904 (826) 341 3 

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

            

          Commercial

           2,184 70  57 (764) 1,547 216 
           

          U.S. Treasury

           $ $ $ $ $ $ $                 
           

          Agency obligations

           49 9  5 16 79 9 

          Total trading mortgage-backed securities

           $6,122 $221 $ $1,374 $(2,389)$5,328 $170 
                                         

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           $49 $9 $ $5 $16 $79 $9 

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

            $2 $ $47 $16 $65 $(2)
                         

          State and municipal

           $57 13  236 (1)$305 18 

          State and municipal

           $109 $(49)$ $300 $92 $452 $(49)

          Foreign government

           386 6  5 27 424 (4)

          Foreign government

           590 24  (134) (36) 444 4 

          Corporate

           6,211 236  198 (273) 6,372 189 

          Corporate

           9,435 404  (764) (446) 8,629 431 

          Equity securities

           533 14  362 (58) 851 62 

          Equity securities

           1,866 161  (899) 27 1,155 25 

          Asset-backed securities

           4,202 (55)  4,850 (1,494) 7,503 66 

          Other debt securities

           16,846 1,133   (1,122) (491) 16,366 1,018 

          Other debt securities

           1,047 (39)  108 (23) 1,093 4 
                                         

          Total trading securities

          Total trading securities

           $44,693 $3,301 $ $(3,144)$(2,764)$42,086 $3,087 

          Total trading securities

           $18,558 $398 $ $7,180 $(4,195)$21,941 $503 
                                         

          Derivatives, net(4)

          Derivatives, net(4)

           $1,180 $(2,407)$ $(1,107)$2,866 $532 $(3,064)

          Derivatives, net(4)

           
                          

          Interest rate contracts

           $575 $(91)$ $(37)$(214)$233 $(84)
           

          Foreign exchange contracts

           250 (162)  62 (19) 131 (222)
           

          Equity contracts

           (1,233) (196)  277 (89) (1,241) (539)
           

          Commodity and other contracts

           (524) (158)  (5) (112) (799) (62)
           

          Credit derivatives

           2,073 33  9 (385) 1,730 (349)
                         

          Total derivatives, net(4)

          Total derivatives, net(4)

           $1,141 $(574)$ $306 $(819)$54 $(1,256)
                         

          Investments

          Investments

           

          Investments

           

          Mortgage-backed securities

           

          Mortgage-backed securities

           
           

          U.S. government sponsored

           $78 $ $1 $ $(79)$ $1  

          U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed

           $1 $ $ $ $ $1 $ 
           

          Prime

           775  50 99 (51) 873 59  

          Prime

           772  78 (539) (78) 233 3 
           

          Alt-A

           271  11 (114) (101) 67 16  

          Alt-A

           205  35 (153) (65) 22  
           

          Subprime

           17   2  19   

          Subprime

           14  (1) (13)    
           

          Commercial

           719  62 2 (19) 764 14  

          Non-U.S. Residential

           814   (814)    
                          

          Commercial

           558  11  (18) 551  

          Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities

           $1,860 $ $124 $(11)$(250)$1,723 $90                 
                         

          Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities

           $2,364 $ $123 $(1,519)$(161)$807 $3 

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           

          Agency obligations

           $19 $ $ $ $(1)$18 $ 
                         

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           $19 $ $ $ $(1)$18 $ 
           

          U.S. Treasury

           $ $ $ $ $ $ $                 
           

          Agency obligations

           9    (5) 4  

          State and municipal

           $457 $ $ $(233)$(224)$ $ 
                         

          Foreign government

           282  14 21 22 339 14 

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           $9 $ $ $ $(5)$4 $ 

          Corporate

           1,271  46 (294) (112) 911 17 
                         

          Equity securities

           2,238  (1) (12) (99) 2,126 (23)

          State and municipal

           $252 $ $2 $ $ $254 $ 

          Asset-backed securities

           12,303  (34) (4,918) (192) 7,159 121 

          Foreign government

           168   89 14 271  

          Other debt securities

           891  (41) 42 33 925 (11)

          Corporate

           1,688  3 (86) (200) 1,405 $5 

          Non-marketable equity securities

           $6,561 $ $318 $43 $(632)$6,290 $323 

          Equity securities

           2,818  (15) (22) (239) 2,542 10                 

          Other debt securities

           8,429  523 (194) (156) 8,602 454 

          Non-marketable equity securities

           7,800  (40) (8) (106) 7,646 (226)
                         

          Total investments

           $23,024 $ $597 $(232)$(942)$22,447 $333 
                         

          Table of Contents

           
            
           Net realized/ unrealized
          gains (losses) included in
            
            
            
            
           
           
            
           Transfers
          in and/or
          out of
          Level 3
           Purchases,
          issuances
          and
          settlements
            
           Unrealized
          gains
          (losses)
          still held(3)
           
          In millions of dollars June 30,
          2010
           Principal
          transactions
           Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
          2010
           

          Total investments

           $26,386 $ $425 $(6,870)$(1,366)$18,575 $444 
                          

          Loans

           $3,668 $ $(38)$378 $(87)$3,921 $56 

          MSRs

            4,894    (778)    (140) 3,976  (778)

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

            3,089    7  44  (442) 2,698  211 
                          

          Liabilities

                                

          Interest-bearing deposits

           $183 $ $(10)$(35)$3 $161 $(29)

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

            1,091 $(40)   3  276  1,410  (29)

          Trading account liabilities

                                
           

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

            621  (6)   (34) 190  783  (32)

          Short-term borrowings

            445  (26)   351  (5) 817  (32)

          Long-term debt

            10,741  (187) (67) 338  (801) 10,532  (199)

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

            7    (1)   (8)     
                          


           
            
           Net realized/ unrealized
          gains (losses) included in
            
            
            
            
           
           
            
           Transfers
          in and/or
          out of
          Level 3
           Purchases,
          issuances
          and
          settlements
            
           Unrealized
          gains
          (losses)
          still held(3)
           
          In millions of dollars December 31,
          2009
           Principal
          transactions
           Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
          2010
           

          Assets

                                

          Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

           $ $509 $ $6,931 $740 $8,180 $ 

          Trading securities

                                
           

          Trading mortgage-backed securities

                                
             

          U.S. government sponsored

           $972 $(220)   329  (236)$845  (198)
             

          Prime

            384  56    338  113  891  4 
             

          Alt-A

            387  45    201  (282) 351  11 
             

          Subprime

            8,998  182    (601) (7,226) 1,353  82 
             

          Non-U.S. residential

            572  2    645  (878) 341   
             

          Commercial

            2,451  59    (126) (837) 1,547  309 
                          
           

          Total trading mortgage-backed securities

           $13,764 $124 $ $786 $(9,346)$5,328 $208 
                          
           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

             $2 $ $47 $16 $65 $(4)
           

          State and municipal

           $222  24    292  (233) 305  17 
           

          Foreign government

            459  17    (181) 129  424  (19)
           

          Corporate

            8,620  161    (285) (2,124) 6,372  7 
           

          Equity securities

            640  30    350  (169) 851  84 
           

          Asset-backed securities

            3,006  (132)   4,894  (265) 7,503  (151)
           

          Other debt securities

            13,231  (16)   (147) (11,975) 1,093  8 
                          

          Total trading securities

           $39,942 $210 $ $5,756 $(23,967)$21,941 $150 
                          

          Derivatives, net(4)

                                
            

          Interest rate contracts

           $(374)$574 $ $300 $(267)$233 $504 
            

          Foreign exchange contracts

            (38) 182    (36) 23  131  173 
            

          Equity contracts

            (1,110) (423)   (5) 297  (1,241) (774)
            

          Commodity and other contracts

            (529) (274)   63  (59) (799) (107)
            

          Credit derivatives

            5,159  (1,242)   (866) (1,321) 1,730  (1,271)
                          

          Total derivatives, net(4)

           $3,108 $(1,183)$ $(544)$(1,327)$54 $(1,475)
                          

          Investments

                                
           

          Mortgage-backed securities

                                
             

          U.S. government-sponsored agency guaranteed

           $2 $ $(1)$ $ $1 $ 
             

          Prime

            736    (35) (469) 1  233  3 
             

          Alt-A

            55    12  37  (82) 22   
             

          Subprime

            1    (2) 1       
             

          Non-U.S. Residential

                         
             

          Commercial

            746   $(438) 2  241  551   
                          
           

          Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities

           $1,540 $ $(464)$(429)$160 $807 $3 
                          

          Table of Contents

           
            
           Net realized/ unrealized
          gains (losses) included in
            
            
            
            
           
           
            
           Transfers
          in and/or
          out of
          Level 3
           Purchases,
          issuances
          and
          settlements
            
           Unrealized
          gains
          (losses)
          still held(3)
           
          In millions of dollars December 31,
          2009
           Principal
          transactions
           Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
          2010
           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                                
           

          Agency obligations

           $21 $ $(21)$ $18 $18 $(1)
                          

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           $21 $ $(21)$ $18 $18 $(1)
                          
           

          State and municipal

           $217 $ $7 $ $(224)$ $ 
           

          Foreign government

            270    21  11  37  339  5 
           

          Corporate

            1,257    (33) (58) (255) 911  6 
           

          Equity securities

            2,513    25  78  (490) 2,126  (79)
           

          Asset-backed securities

            8,272    (70) (100) (943) 7,159  (133)
           

          Other debt securities

            560    (14) 6  373  925  29 
           

          Non-marketable equity securities

            6,753    333  (65) (731) 6,290  277 
                          

          Total investments

           $21,403 $ $(216)$(557)$(2,055)$18,575 $107 
                          

          Loans

           $213 $ $(178)$993 $2,893 $3,921 $(168)

          MSRs

            6,530    (1,976)   (578) 3,976  (1,976)

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

            1,101    (20) 2,027  (410) 2,698  (20)
                          

          Liabilities

                                

          Interest-bearing deposits

           $28 $ $(8)$(41)$166 $161 $(36)

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

            2,056 $(138)   (973) 189  1,410  (5)

          Trading account liabilities

                                
           

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

            774  46    (103) 158  783  13 

          Short-term borrowings

            231  (18)   245  323  817  (16)

          Long-term debt

            9,654  85  78  670  371  10,532  (121)

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

            13    (20)   (33)    
                          


           
            
           Net realized/ unrealized
          gains (losses) included in
            
            
            
            
           
           
            
           Transfers
          in and/or
          out of
          Level 3
           Purchases,
          issuances
          and
          settlements
            
           Unrealized
          gains
          (losses)
          still held(3)
           
          In millions of dollars June 30,
          2009
           Principal
          transactions
           Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
          2009
           

          Assets

                                

          Trading securities

                                
           

          Trading mortgage-backed securities

                                
            

          U.S. government sponsored

           $1,244 $(71)$ $127 $(138)$1,162 $(116)
            

          Prime

            623  (76)   (39) (50) 458  (37)
            

          Alt-A

            777  18    (75) (158) 562  18 
            

          Subprime

            10,001  1,752    (515) (1,480) 9,758  1,785 
            

          Non-U.S. residential

            345  (3)   (142) 90  290  (3)
            

          Commercial

            2,808  (1)   114  (190) 2,731  2 
                          
           

          Total trading mortgage-backed securities

           $15,798 $1,619 $ $(530)$(1,926)$14,961 $1,649 
                          
           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

                                
            

          U.S. Treasury

           $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
            

          Agency obligations

            49  9    5  16  79  9 
                          
           

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           $49 $9 $ $5 $16 $79 $9 
                          
           

          State and municipal

           $109 $(49)$ $300 $92 $452 $(49)
           

          Foreign government

            590  24    (134) (36) 444  4 
           

          Corporate

            9,435  404    (764) (446) 8,629  431 
           

          Equity securities

            1,866  161    (899) 27  1,155  25 
           

          Other debt securities

            16,846  1,133    (1,122) (491) 16,366  1,018 
                          

          Total trading securities

           $44,693 $3,301 $ $(3,144)$(2,764)$42,086 $3,087 
                          

          Derivatives, net(4)

           $1,180 $(2,407)$ $(1,107)$2,866 $532 $(3,064)
                          

          Investments

                                
           

          Mortgage-backed securities

                                
            

          U.S. government sponsored

           $78 $ $1 $ $(79)$ $1 
            

          Prime

            775    50  99  (51) 873  59 
            

          Alt-A

            271    11  (114) (101) 67  16 

          Table of Contents




            
           Net realized/ unrealized
          gains (losses) included in
            
            
            
            
           
            
           Net realized/ unrealized
          gains (losses) included in
            
            
            
            
           


            
           Transfers
          in and/or
          out of
          Level 3
           Purchases,
          issuances
          and
          settlements
            
           Unrealized
          gains
          (losses)
          still held(3)
           
            
           Transfers
          in and/or
          out of
          Level 3
           Purchases,
          issuances
          and
          settlements
            
           Unrealized
          gains
          (losses)
          still held(3)
           
          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars June 30,
          2009
           Principal
          transactions
           Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
          2009
           In millions of dollars June 30,
          2009
           Principal
          transactions
           Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
          2009
           
           

          Subprime

           17   2  19  
           

          Commercial

           719  62 2 (19) 764 14 
                         

          Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities

           $1,860 $ $124 $(11)$(250)$1,723 $90 
                         

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           
           

          U.S. Treasury

           $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
           

          Agency obligations

           9    (5) 4  
                         

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           $9 $ $ $ $(5)$4 $ 
                         

          State and municipal

           $252 $ $2 $ $ $254 $ 

          Foreign government

           168   89 14 271  

          Corporate

           1,688  3 (86) (200) 1,405 $5 

          Equity securities

           2,818  (15) (22) (239) 2,542 10 

          Other debt securities

           8,429  523 (194) (156) 8,602 454 

          Non-marketable equity securities

           7,800  (40) (8) (106) 7,646 (226)
                         

          Total investments

          Total investments

           $23,024 $ $597 $(232)$(942)$22,447 $333 
                         

          Loans

          Loans

           $196 $ $24 $ $(5)$215 $24 

          Loans

           $196 $ $24 $ $(5)$215 $24 

          Mortgage servicing rights

           $6,770 $ $(444)$ $(98)$6,228 $(444)

          MSRs

          MSRs

           $6,770 $ $(444)$ $(98)$6,228 $(444)

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

           1,645  (347) (67) (47) 1,184 $(347)

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

           1,645  (347) (67) (47) 1,184 $(347)
                                         

          Liabilities

          Liabilities

           

          Liabilities

           

          Interest-bearing deposits

          Interest-bearing deposits

           $112 $ $63 $ $(18)$31 $63 

          Interest-bearing deposits

           $112 $ $63 $ $(18)$31 $63 

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

           7,204 (32)  1,622 (375) 8,483 (40)

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

           7,204 (32)  1,622 (375) 8,483 (40)

          Trading account liabilities

          Trading account liabilities

           

          Trading account liabilities

           

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

           961 (14)  (166) 410 1,219 15 

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

           961 (14)  (166) 410 1,219 15 

          Short-term borrowings

          Short-term borrowings

           377  9 (75) (134) 159 9 

          Short-term borrowings

           377  9 (75) (134) 159 9 

          Long-term debt

          Long-term debt

           11,201  (385) 414 (894) 11,106 (456)

          Long-term debt

           11,201  (385) 414 (894) 11,106 (456)

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

           19  (2)  (20) 1 (1)

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

           19  (2)  (20) 1 (1)
                                         

           



            
           Net realized/ unrealized
          gains (losses) included in
            
            
            
            
           
            
           Net realized/ unrealized
          gains (losses) included in
            
            
            
            
           


            
           Transfers
          in and/or
          out of
          Level 3
           Purchases,
          issuances
          and
          settlements
            
           Unrealized
          gains
          (losses)
          still held(3)
           
            
           Transfers
          in and/or
          out of
          Level 3
           Purchases,
          issuances
          and
          settlements
            
           Unrealized
          gains
          (losses)
          still held(3)
           
          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars December 31,
          2008
           Principal
          transactions
           Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
          2009
           
          In millions of dollars
           December 31,
          2008
           Principal
          transactions
           Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
          2009
           

          Assets

          Assets

           

          Assets

           

          Trading securities

          Trading securities

           

          Trading securities

           
           

          Trading mortgage-backed securities

           

          Trading mortgage-backed securities

           
           

          U.S. government sponsored

           $1,325 $145 $ $137 $(445)$1,162 $89  

          U.S. government sponsored

           $1,325 $145 $ $137 $(445)$1,162 $89 
           

          Prime

           147 (131)  400 42 458 (83) 

          Prime

           147 (131)  400 42 458 (83)
           

          Alt-A

           1,153 (101)  (262) (228) 562 (101) 

          Alt-A

           1,153 (101)  (262) (228) 562 (101)
           

          Subprime

           13,844 56  (1,225) (2,917) 9,758 2,262  

          Subprime

           13,844 56  (1,225) (2,917) 9,758 2,262 
           

          Non-U.S. residential

           858 (77)  (632) 141 290 12  

          Non-U.S. residential

           858 (77)  (632) 141 290 12 
           

          Commercial

           2,949 (196)  273 (295) 2,731 (207) 

          Commercial

           2,949 (196)  273 (295) 2,731 (207)
                                         
           

          Total trading mortgage-backed securities

           $20,276 $(304)$ $(1,309)$(3,702)$14,961 $1,972 

          Total trading mortgage-backed securities

           $20,276 $(304)$ $(1,309)$(3,702)$14,961 $1,972 
                                         
           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           
           

          U.S. Treasury

           $ $ $ $ $ $ $  

          U.S. Treasury

           $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
           

          Agency obligations

           59   2 18 79 2  

          Agency obligations

           59   2 18 79 2 
                                         
           

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           $59 $ $ $2 $18 $79 $2 

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           $59 $ $ $2 $18 $79 $2 
                                         
           

          State and municipal

           $233 $(71)$ $220 $70 $452 $(49)

          State and municipal

           $233 $(71)$ $220 $70 $452 $(49)
           

          Foreign government

           1,261 120  (501) (436) 444 29 

          Foreign government

           1,261 120  (501) (436) 444 29 
           

          Corporate

           13,027 (299)  (1,556) (2,543) 8,629 457 

          Corporate

           13,027 (299)  (1,556) (2,543) 8,629 457 
           

          Equity securities

           1,387 252  (778) 294 1,155 90 

          Equity securities

           1,387 252  (778) 294 1,155 90 
           

          Other debt securities

           14,530 1,144  (2,320) 3,012 16,366 1,044 

          Other debt securities

           14,530 1,144  (2,320) 3,012 16,366 1,044 
                                         

          Total trading securities

          Total trading securities

           $50,773 $842 $ $(6,242)$(3,287)$42,086 $3,545 

          Total trading securities

           $50,773 $842 $ $(6,242)$(3,287)$42,086 $3,545 
                                         

          Derivatives, net(4)

          Derivatives, net(4)

           $3,586 $(4,783)$ $(1,824)$3,553 $532 $(3,026)

          Derivatives, net(4)

           $3,586 $(4,783)$ $(1,824)$3,553 $532 $(3,026)
                                         

          Investments

          Investments

           

          Investments

           
           

          Mortgage-backed securities

           

          Mortgage-backed securities

           
           

          U.S. government sponsored

           $ $ $1 $75 $(76)$ $3  

          U.S. government sponsored

           $ $ $1 $75 $(76)$ $3 
           

          Prime

           1,163  211 132 (633) 873 213 
           

          Alt-A

           111  44 (51) (37) 67 17 
           

          Subprime

           25  (9) (8) 11 19  
           

          Commercial

           964  71 (461) 190 764 29 
                         
           

          Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities

           $2,263 $ $318 $(313)$(545)$1,723 $262 
                         
           

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           
           

          U.S. Treasury

           $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
           

          Agency obligations

              9 (5) 4  
                         
           

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           $ $ $ $9 $(5)$4 $ 
                         

          Table of Contents


           
            
           Net realized/ unrealized
          gains (losses) included in
            
            
            
            
           
           
            
           Transfers
          in and/or
          out of
          Level 3
           Purchases,
          issuances
          and
          settlements
            
           Unrealized
          gains
          (losses)
          still held(3)
           
          In millions of dollars December 31,
          2008
           Principal
          transactions
           Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
          2009
           
            

          State and municipal

           $222 $ $2 $30 $ $254 $ 
            

          Foreign government

            571      (313) 13  271  (1)
            

          Corporate

            1,019    47  568  (229) 1,405  40 
            

          Equity securities

            3,807    (495) (152) (618) 2,542  (34)
            

          Other debt securities

            11,324    96  (1,142) (1,676) 8,602  643 
            

          Non-marketable equity securities

            9,067    (746) (247) (428) 7,646  (238)
                          

          Total investments

           $28,273 $ $(778)$(1,560)$(3,488)$22,447 $672 
                          

          Loans

           $160 $ $43 $ $12 $215 $24 

          Mortgage servicing rights

           $5,657 $ $996 $ $(425)$6,228 $996 

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

            359    205  689  (69) 1,184 $205 
                          

          Liabilities

                                

          Interest-bearing deposits

           $54 $ $4 $ $(19)$31 $49 

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

            11,167  276    (2,098) (310) 8,483  (320)

          Trading account liabilities

                                
            

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

            653  30    (181) 777  1,219  25 

          Short-term borrowings

            1,329    (56) (821) (405) 159  (72)

          Long-term debt

            11,198    (349) 88  (529) 11,106  (215)

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

            1    (45)   (45) 1   
                          


           
            
           Net realized/ unrealized
          gains (losses) included in
            
            
            
            
           
           
            
            
           Purchases,
          issuances
          and
          settlements
            
           Unrealized
          gains
          (losses)
          still held(3)
           
          In millions of dollars June 30,
          2008
           Principal
          transactions
           Other(1)(2) Transfers
          in and/or
          out of Level 3
           September 30,
          2008
           

          Assets

                                

          Trading account assets

                                
           

          Trading securities and loans

           $76,819 $(5,640)$ $13,283 $857 $85,319 $(5,439)

          Investments

            27,086    (1,287) 3,818  (1,381) 28,236  (1,190)

          Loans

            145  (14)     24  155  (22)

          Mortgage servicing rights

            8,934    (396)   (192) 8,346  (396)

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

            1,451    (26) 353  (102) 1,676  (3)
                          

          Liabilities

                                

          Interest-bearing deposits

           $111 $10 $ $ $(17)$84 $8 

          Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

            3,166  (159)   73  (579) 2,819  (39)

          Trading account liabilities

                                
           

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

            1,718  3    366  (950) 1,131  34 
           

          Derivatives, net(4)

            102  2,904    3,072  2,878  3,148  3,092 

          Short-term borrowings

            1,160  54    511  274  1,891  38 

          Long-term debt

            38,355  940    3,277  (6,877) 33,815  403 

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

            26    (45)   (46) 25  (45)
                          

          Table of Contents




            
           Net realized/ unrealized
          gains (losses) included in
            
            
            
            
           
            
           Net realized/ unrealized
          gains (losses) included in
            
            
            
            
           


            
           Transfers
          in and/or
          out of
          Level 3
           Purchases,
          issuances
          and
          settlements
            
           Unrealized
          gains
          (losses)
          still held(3)
           
            
           Transfers
          in and/or
          out of
          Level 3
           Purchases,
          issuances
          and
          settlements
            
           Unrealized
          gains
          (losses)
          still held(3)
           
          In millions of dollarsIn millions of dollars December 31,
          2007
           Principal
          transactions
           Other(1)(2) September 30,
          2008
           
          In millions of dollars
           December 31,
          2008
           Principal
          transactions
           Other(1)(2) Sept. 30,
          2009
           

          Assets

           

          Securities purchased under agreements to resell

           $16 $ $ $ $(16)$ $ 

          Trading account assets

           

          Trading securities and loans

           75,573 (18,831)  32,028 (3,451) 85,319 (14,065) 

          Prime

           1,163  211 132 (633) 873 213 

          Investments

           17,060  (2,834) 6,789 7,221 28,236 (1,268)
           

          Alt-A

           111  44 (51) (37) 67 17 
           

          Subprime

           25  (9) (8) 11 19  
           

          Commercial

           964  71 (461) 190 764 29 
                         

          Total investment mortgage-backed debt securities

           $2,263 $ $318 $(313)$(545)$1,723 $262 
                         

          U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           
           

          U.S. Treasury

           $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
           

          Agency obligations

              9 (5) 4  
                         

          Total U.S. Treasury and federal agencies securities

           $ $ $ $9 $(5)$4 $ 
                         

          State and municipal

           $222 $ $2 $30 $ $254 $ 

          Foreign government

           571   (313) 13 271 (1)

          Corporate

           1,019  47 568 (229) 1,405 40 

          Equity securities

           3,807  (495) (152) (618) 2,542 (34)

          Other debt securities

           11,324  96 (1,142) (1,676) 8,602 643 

          Non-Marketable equity securities

           9,067  (746) (247) (428) 7,646 (238)
                         

          Total investments

          Total investments

           $28,273 $ $(778)$(1,560)$(3,488)$22,447 $672 
                         

          Loans

          Loans

           9 (3)   149 155 (2)

          Loans

           $160 $ $43 $ $12 $215 $24 

          Mortgage servicing rights

          Mortgage servicing rights

           8,380  568  (602) 8,346 568 

          Mortgage servicing rights

           $5,657 $ $996 $ $(425)$6,228 $996 

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

           1,171  21 422 62 1,676 21 

          Other financial assets measured on a recurring basis

           359  205 689 (69) 1,184 $205 
                                         

          Liabilities

          Liabilities

           

          Liabilities

           

          Interest-bearing deposits

          Interest-bearing deposits

           $56 $(9)$ $13 $6 $84 $(3)

          Interest-bearing deposits

           $54 $ $4 $ $(19)$31 $49 

          Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

           6,158 (88)  (2,293) (1,134) 2,819 45 

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

          Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

           11,167 276  (2,098) (310) 8,483 (320)

          Trading account liabilities

          Trading account liabilities

           

          Trading account liabilities

           

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

           473 (5)  998 (345) 1,131 118 

          Derivatives, net(4)

           2,470 5,701  3,178 3,201 3,148 3,638 

          Securities sold, not yet purchased

           653 30  (181) 777 1,219 25 

          Short-term borrowings

          Short-term borrowings

           5,016 203  (1,772) (1,150) 1,891 110 

          Short-term borrowings

           1,329  (56) (821) (405) 159 (72)

          Long-term debt

          Long-term debt

           8,953 1,349  41,296 (15,085) 33,815 875 

          Long-term debt

           11,198  (349) 88 (529) 11,106 (215)

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

           1  (59)  (35) 25 (5)

          Other financial liabilities measured on a recurring basis

           1  (45)  (45) 1  
                                         

          (1)
          Changes in fair value for available-for-sale investments (debt securities) are recorded inAccumulated other comprehensive income, while gains and losses from sales are recorded inRealized gains (losses) from sales of investments on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

          (2)
          Unrealized gains (losses) on MSRs are recorded inCommissions and feesOther revenue on the Consolidated Statement of Income.

          (3)
          Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings (andAccumulated other comprehensive income for changes in fair value for available-for-sale investments), that is attributable to the change in fair value relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at September 30, 20092010 and 2008.2009.

          (4)
          Total Level 3 derivative exposuresassets and liabilities have been netted in these tables for presentation purposes only.

          Table of Contents

                  The following is a discussion of the changes to the Level 3 balances for each of the roll-forward tables presented above.

          The significant changes from June 30, 2010 to September 30, 2010 in Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

            A net increase inFederal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell of $1.7 billion, which was driven by transfers from Level 2 to Level 3, due to an increase in the expected maturities on these instruments.

            A net increase in trading securities of $3.4 billion that was mainly driven by:

            (1)
            A net decrease of $0.8 billion in trading mortgage-backed securities, which included transfers to Level 3 of $1.4 billion, the majority of which related to the reclassification of certain securities from Investments to Trading under the fair value option upon the adoption of ASU 2010-11 on July 1, 2010, as described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. (For purposes of the Level 3 roll-forward above, Level 3 Investments that were reclassified to Trading upon adoption of ASU 2010-11 have been classified as transfers out of Level 3 Investments, and transfers to Level 3 Trading Securities). The more significant items included in settlements of $2.4 billion during the quarter included the sale of non-U.S. residential mortgage backed securities that were reclassified to Trading, the liquidation of certain high-grade subprime positions and sales of commercial mortgage-backed securities.

            (2)
            An increase of $3.3 billion in asset-backed trading securities, which included transfers to Level 3 of $4.9 billion. Substantially all of these Level 3 transfers related to the reclassification to Trading upon adoption of ASU 2010-11 noted above. Net settlements of $1.5 billion included sales of $1 billion of securities that were reclassified to Trading.

            The decrease in net derivatives of $1.1 billion includes trading losses of $0.6 billion and net settlements of $0.8 billion, partially offset by net transfers from Level 2 to Level 3 of $0.3 billion.

            The decrease inInvestments of $7.8 billion included transfers out of Level 3 of $6.9 billion, the most significant being mortgage-backed securities of $1.5 billion and asset-backed securities of $4.9 billion. Substantially all of these transfers out of Level 3 relate to the adoption of ASU 2010-11 noted above. Net settlements of $1.4 billion include sales of non-marketable equity securities of $0.6 billion, relating to the sale of private equity investments.

          The significant changes from December 31, 2009 to September 30, 2010 in Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

            A net increase inFederal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell of $8.2 billion, due mainly to transfers from Level 2 to Level 3 of $6.9 billion.

            A net decrease in trading securities of $18.0 billion that was mainly driven by:

            (1)
            A decrease of $12.1 billion in other debt trading securities, due primarily to the impact of the consolidation of the credit card securitization trusts by the Company upon the adoption of SFAS 166/167 on January 1, 2010. Upon consolidation of the trusts, the Company's investments in the trusts and other intercompany balances are eliminated. At January 1, 2010, the Company's investment in these newly consolidated VIEs included certificates issued by the trusts of $11.1 billion that were classified as Level 3. The impact of the elimination of these certificates has been reflected as net settlements in the Level 3 roll-forward above.

            (2)
            A decrease of $7.6 billion in subprime trading mortgage-backed securities, due primarily to the liquidation of super-senior subprime exposures.

            (3)
            A decrease in corporate debt securities of $2.2 billion, due primarily to net paydowns / sales.

            (4)
            These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $4.5 billion in asset-backed trading securities, including $4.9 billion of Transfers to Level 3 substantially all of which related to the adoption of ASU 2010-11 noted above, as these securities were reclassified from Investments to Trading.

            The decrease inInvestments of $2.8 billion was primarily due to net paydowns / sales of $2.1 billion. Net transfers out of Level 3 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $0.6 billion. As noted above, asset-backed securities of $4.9 billion were transferred out of Level 3 during the third quarter related to the adoption of ASU 2010-11, when these securities were reclassified from Investments to Trading. In the second quarter, asset-backed securities of $4.8 billion were transferred to Level 3 Investments, when these securities were reclassified from HTM to AFS at June 30, 2010, prior to the reclassification of these securities to Trading on July 1, 2010.

            The increase inLoans of $3.7 billion is due primarily to the Company's consolidation of certain VIEs upon the adoption of SFAS 166/167 on January 1, 2010, for which the fair value option was elected. The impact from consolidation of these VIEs on Level 3 loans has been reflected as purchases in the roll-forward table above.

            The decrease inMSRs of $2.5 billion is due primarily to losses of $2.0 billion, due to a reduction in interest rates.

          Table of Contents

          The significant changes from June 30, 2009 to September 30, 2009 Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

            A net decrease in trading securities of $2.6 billion that was driven by:

            (i)
            Net realized / unrealized gains of $3.3 billion recorded inPrincipal transactions, composed mainly of gains on subprime mortgage-backed securities ($1.7 billion) and other debt securities ($1.1 billion);

            (ii)
            Net transfers to Level 2 of $3.1 billion, which relates mainly to securities issued by credit card securitization trusts, for which significant inputs into valuations became more readily observable during the quarter;

            (iii)
            Net settlements of $2.8 billion, including liquidations of subprime trading securities of $1.5 billion during the third quarter.

            A net increase in federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase of $1.3 billion. This was driven mainly by transfers to Level 3 during the third quarter of $1.6 billion, and relates to structured repurchase agreements with longer effective maturity dates.

          The significant changes from December 31, 2008 to September 30, 2009 Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

            A net decrease in trading securities of $8.7 billion that was mainly driven by:

            (i)
            Net transfers of $6.2 billion to Level 2 inventory, including corporate debt ($1.6 billion) and subprime trading securities ($1.2 billion) and other debt trading securities ($2.3 billion). The transfer of other debt securities to Level 2 was mainly due to securities issued by credit card securitization trusts, for which significant inputs into valuations became more readily observable;

            (ii)
            Net realized / unrealized gains of $0.8 billion recorded inPrincipal transactions.

            (iii)
            Net settlements of $3.3 billion, primarily due to liquidations of subprime trading securities of $2.9 billion.

            A net decrease in investments of $5.8 billion that resulted from:

            (i)
            Net realized / unrealized losses recorded in other income of $0.8 billion, due primarily to losses on private equity investments and real estate fund investments;

            (ii)
            Net settlements of investment securities of $3.5 billion due to pay-downs and sales.

            (iii)
            Net transfers of $1.5 billion of investments to Level 2.

          A decrease in trading derivatives of $3.1 billion includes net realized and unrealized losses of $4.8 billion recorded inPrincipal transactions, mainly on complex derivative contracts such as those linked to credit and equity exposures. These losses are partially offset by gains recognized on instruments that have been classified in Levels 1 and 2.

        Transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the Fair Value Hierarchy

                The following is a discussionCompany did not have any significant transfers of assets or liabilities between Levels 1 and 2 of the changes to the Level 3 balances for each of the rollforward tables presented above.

          For the period June 30, 2008 to September 30, 2008, the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

          The increase in trading securities and loans of $8.5 billion, which was driven primarily by the net transfer of $13.3 billion of trading assets into Level 3, including ABS securities, warehouse loans backed by auto lease receivables, and certificates issued by the U.S. credit card securitization trust that are retained by the Company. This was offset by various write-downs recognized by the Company during the quarter.

          The increase in net derivative trading account liabilities of $3.0 billion was due to $3.1 billion of net transfers into Level 3, as illiquid markets continued to negatively impact the availability of observable pricing inputs. $2.9 billion of net additions was offset by $2.9 billion of mark-to-market gains. A portion of these gains was offset by losses recognized for positions classified in Level 2.

          The decrease in long-term debt of $4.5 billion as maturities of the consolidated SIV's debt was offset by the transfer of certain debt obligations from Level 2 to Level 3. Long-term debt was also reduced by mark-to-market gains, driven by the widening of Company's own-credit spreads.

          The significant changes from December 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008 in Level 3 assets and liabilities are due to:

          A net increase in trading securities and loans of $9.7 billion as net write-downs recognized on various trading securities and net reductions from settlements/sales were more than offset by the net transfer of trading securities into Level 3. The continued lack of availability of observable pricing inputs was the primary cause of this net transfer.

          The increase in investments of $11.2 billion primarily resulted from the $8.7 billion in senior debt securities retained from the Company's April 17, 2008 sale of a corporate loan portfolio that included highly leveraged loans. In addition, $1.4 billion of

        Table of Contents

        certificates issued by the U.S credit card securitization trust and retained by the Company were transferred from Level 2 to Level 3fair value hierarchy during the third quarter of 2008.2010.

            The reduction in securities sold under agreement to repurchase of $3.3 billion, was primarily driven by the transfer of positions from Level 3 to Level 2 as valuation methodology inputs considered to be unobservable were determined to be insignificant to the overall valuation.

            The decrease in short-term borrowings of $3.1 billion, which was primarily due to net transfers out of $1.8 billion as valuation methodology inputs considered to be unobservable were determined to be insignificant to the overall valuation, and payments of $1.2 billion against the short-term debt obligations.

            The increase in long-term debt of $24.9 billion was driven by the transfer of consolidated SIV liabilities to Level 3 due to the lack of observable inputs, offset by the payments made against this debt in the second and third quarters of 2008.

        Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

                Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurringnon-recurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above.

                These include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during thethese periods as a result of an impairment. In addition, these assets such asinclude loans held for saleheld-for-sale (HFS) that are measured at the lower of cost or market (LOCOM), that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period.

                The fair value of loans measured on a LOCOM basis is determined where possible using quoted secondary-market prices. Such loans are generally classified inas Level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy given the level of activity in the market and the frequency of available quotes. If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets, adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan.

                The following table presents all loans held-for-saleHFS that are carried at LOCOM as of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 20082009 (in billions):

         
         Aggregate
        Cost
         Fair
        Value
         Level 2 Level 3 

        September 30, 2009

         $2.8 $1.6 $0.5 $1.1 

        December 31, 2008

          3.1  2.1  0.8  1.3 
                  
         
         Aggregate
        cost
         Fair value Level 2 Level 3 

        September 30, 2010

         $4.1 $3.6 $0.5 $3.1 
                  

        December 31, 2009

         $2.5 $1.6 $0.3 $1.3 
                  

        Table of Contents


        18.    FAIR-VALUE17.    FAIR VALUE ELECTIONS

                The Company may elect to report most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value reported in earnings. After the initial adoption, theThe election is made upon the acquisition of an eligible financial asset, financial liability or firm commitment or when certain specified reconsideration events occur. The fair-value election may not be revoked once an election is made.

                Additionally, the transition provisions of ASC 825-10 (SFAS 159) permit a one-time election for existing positions at the adoption date with a cumulative-effect adjustment included in opening retained earnings and future changes in fair value reported in earnings.

                The Company also has elected to adopt the fair-value accounting provisions for certain assets and liabilities prospectively. Hybrid financial instruments, such as structured notes containing embedded derivatives that otherwise would require bifurcation, as well as certain interest-only instruments, may be accounted for at fair value if the Company makes an irrevocable election to do so on an instrument-by-instrument basis. The changes in fair value are recorded in current earnings. Additional discussion regarding the applicable areas in which fair value elections were made is presented in Note 1716 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

                All servicing rights must now be recognized initially at fair value. At its initial adoption, the standard permits a one-time irrevocable election to re-measure each class of servicing rights at fair value, with the changes in fair value recorded in current earnings. The classes of servicing rights are identified based on the availability of market inputs used in determining their fair values and the methods for managing their risks. The Company has elected fair-value accounting for its mortgage and student loan classes of servicing rights. The impact of adopting this standard was not material. See Note 1514 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of mortgage servicing rights.


        Table of ContentsMSRs.

                The following table presents, as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the fair value of those positions selected for fair-value accounting, as well as the changes in fair value for the nine months ended September 30, 20092010 and September 30, 2008.2009:

         
         Fair Value at Changes in fair value gains
        (losses) for nine months ended
        September 30,
         
        In millions of dollars September 30,
        2009
         December 31,
        2008
         2009 2008(1) 

        Assets

                     

        Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

                     
         

        Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed(2)

         $87,886 $70,305 $(1,284)$675 
                  

        Trading account assets:

                     

        Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities originally classified as available-for-sale

         $ $ $ $(13)
         

        Selected letters of credit hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

          28    61  (2)
         

        Certain credit products

          16,695  16,254  5,461  (1,143)
         

        Certain hybrid financial instruments

          6  33    3 
         

        Retained interests from asset securitizations

          2,153  3,026  1,522  (521)
                  

        Total trading account assets

         $18,882 $19,313 $7,044 $(1,676)
                  

        Investments:

                     
         

        Certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures

         $359 $469 $(52)$(54)
         

        Other

          237  295  (83) (60)
                  

        Total investments

         $596 $764 $(135)$(114)
                  

        Loans:

                     
         

        Certain credit products

         $997 $2,315 $26 $(54)
         

        Certain mortgage loans

          30  36  (2) (22)
         

        Certain hybrid financial instruments

          478  381  54  5 
                  

        Total loans

         $1,505 $2,732 $78 $(71)
                  

        Other assets:

                     
         

        Mortgage servicing rights

         $6,228 $5,657 $996 $568 
         

        Certain mortgage loans

          2,857  4,273  81  21 
         

        Certain equity method investments

          769  936  174  (154)
                  

        Total other assets

         $9,854 $10,866 $1,251 $435 
                  

        Total

         $118,723 $103,980 $6,954 $(751)
                  

        Liabilities

                     

        Interest-bearing deposits:

                     
         

        Certain structured liabilities

         $234 $320 $ $ 
         

        Certain hybrid financial instruments

          1,795  2,286  (562) 557 
                  

        Total interest-bearing deposits

         $2,029 $2,606 $(562)$557 
                  

        Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

                     
         

        Selected portfolios of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned(2)

         $116,693 $138,866 $213 $(44)
                  

        Trading account liabilities:

                     
         

        Selected letters of credit hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

         $ $72 $37 $ 
         

        Certain hybrid financial instruments

          5,980  4,679  (1,798) 2,618 
                  

        Total trading account liabilities

         $5,980 $4,751 $(1,761)$2,618 
                  

        Short-term borrowings:

                     
         

        Certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings

         $188 $2,303 $50 $45 
         

        Certain hybrid financial instruments

          523  2,112  (84) 176 
         

        Certain structured liabilities

          3  3    10 
         

        Certain non-structured liabilities

          729  13,189  (33)  
                  

        Total short-term borrowings

         $1,443 $17,607 $(67)$231 
                  

        Long-term debt:

                     
         

        Certain structured liabilities

         $3,395 $3,083 $(64)$446 
         

        Certain non-structured liabilities

          7,510  7,189  (102) 3,441 
         

        Certain hybrid financial instruments

          16,281  16,991  (1,572) 2,335 
                  

        Total long-term debt

         $27,186 $27,263 $(1,738)$6,222 
                  

        Total

         $153,331 $191,093 $(3,915)$9,584 
                  
         
         Fair value at Changes in fair value gains
        (losses) for the nine months ended
        September 30,
         
        In millions of dollars September 30,
        2010
         December 31,
        2009(1)
         2010 2009(1) 

        Assets

                     

        Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

                     
         

        Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed(2)

         $94,190 $87,812 $669 $(1,284)

        Trading account assets

          13,573  16,725  356  7,044 

        Investments

          496  574  32  (135)

        Loans

                     
         

        Certain corporate loans(3)

          2,755  1,405  (140) 80 
         

        Certain consumer loans(3)

          2,400  34  208  (2)
                  

        Total loans

         $5,155 $1,439 $68 $78 
                  

        Other assets

                     
         

        MSRs

         $3,976 $6,530 $(1,976)$996 
         

        Certain mortgage loans (HFS)

          6,720  3,338  188  81 
         

        Certain equity method investments

          252  598  (36) 174 
                  

        Total other assets

         $10,948 $10,466 $(1,824)$1,251 
                  

        Total assets

         $124,362 $117,016 $(699)$6,954 
                  

        Liabilities

                     

        Interest-bearing deposits

         $1,170 $1,545 $10 $(562)

        Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

                     
         

        Selected portfolios of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned(2)

          119,984  104,030  53  213 

        Trading account liabilities

          4,078  5,325  (223) (1,761)

        Short-term borrowings

          2,494  639  36  (67)

        Long-term debt

          26,640  25,942  (435) (1,738)
                  

        Total

         $154,366 $137,481 $(559)$(3,915)
                  

        (1)
        Reclassified to conform to current period's presentation.

        (2)
        Reflects netting of the amounts due from securities purchased under agreements to resell and the amounts owed under securities sold under agreements to repurchase.

        (3)
        Includes mortgage loans held by mortgage loan securitization VIEs consolidated upon the adoption of SFAS 166/167 on January 1, 2010.

        Table of Contents

        Own-CreditOwn Credit Valuation Adjustment

                The fair value of debt liabilities for which the fair-valuefair value option wasis elected (other than non-recourse and similar liabilities) wasis impacted by the narrowing or widening of the Company's credit spread.spreads. The estimated change in the fair value of these debt liabilities due to such changes in the Company's own credit risk (or instrument-specific credit risk) was a loss of $1.019 billion$233 million and a gain of $1.525$1.019 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and September 30, 2008, respectively,a gain of $217 million and a loss of $2.447 billion and a gain of $2.577 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 20092010 and September 30, 2008,2009, respectively. Changes in fair value resulting from changes in instrument-specific credit risk were estimated by incorporating the Company's current observable credit spreads into the relevant valuation technique used to value each liability as described above.

                During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company changed the source of its credit spreads from those observed in the credit default swap market to those observed in the bond market. Had this modification been in place since the beginning of 2008, the change in the Company's own credit spread would have resulted in a gain of $2.48 billion and a gain of $3.53 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.

        The Fair-ValueFair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities

        Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities

                The Legg Mason convertible preferred equity securities (Legg shares) were acquired in connection with the sale of Citigroup's Asset Management business in December 2005. Prior to the election of fair-value option accounting, the shares were classified as available-for-sale securities with the unrealized loss of $232 million as of December 31, 2006 included inAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss). This unrealized loss was recorded upon election of a fair value as a reduction of January 1, 2007Retained earnings as part of the cumulative-effect adjustment.

                During the first quarter of 2008, the Company sold the remaining 8.4 million Legg shares at a pretax loss of $10.3 million ($6.7 million after-tax).

        Selected portfolios of securities purchased under agreements to resell, securities borrowed, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, securities loaned and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings

                The Company elected the fair-valuefair value option retrospectively for our United States and United Kingdomcertain portfolios of fixed-income securities purchased under agreements to resell and fixed-income securities sold under agreements to repurchase (and certain non-collateralized short-term borrowings). The fair-value option was also elected prospectively on broker-dealer entities in the second quarter of 2007 for certain portfolios of fixed-income securities lendingUnited States, United Kingdom and borrowing transactions based in Japan. In each case, the election was made because the related interest-rate risk is managed on a portfolio basis, primarily with derivative instruments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. Previously, these positions were accounted for on an accrual basis.

                Changes in fair value for transactions in these portfolios are recorded inPrincipal transactions. The related interest revenue and interest expense are measured based on the contractual rates specified in the transactions and are reported as interest revenue and expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

        Selected letters of credit and revolving loans hedged by credit default swaps or participation notes

                The Company has elected the fair-valuefair value option for certain letters of credit that are hedged with derivative instruments or participation notes. Upon electing the fair-value option, the related portions of the allowance for loan losses and the allowance for unfunded lending commitments were reversed. Citigroup elected the fair-valuefair value option for these transactions because the risk is managed on a fair-valuefair value basis and to mitigatemitigates accounting mismatches.

                The notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $1.8 billion as of September 30, 20092010 and $1.4 billion as of December 31, 2008.2009. The amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008.2009.

                These items have been classified inTrading account assets orTrading account liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of these items are classified inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

        Certain loans and other credit products

                Citigroup has elected the fair-valuefair value option for certain originated and purchased loans, including certain unfunded loan products, such as guarantees and letters of credit, executed by Citigroup's trading businesses. None of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment. Significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term, or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the Company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party. Citigroup has elected the fair-valuefair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. Fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the Company, including where those management objectives would not be met.


        Table of Contents

                The following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value:value at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

         
         September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008(1) 
        In millions of dollars Trading
        assets
         Loans Trading
        assets
         Loans 

        Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

         $16,695 $997 $16,254 $2,315 

        Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

         $1,016 $(38)$6,501 $3 

        Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

         $794 $ $77 $ 

        Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

         $461 $ $190 $ 
                  

        (1)
        Reclassified to conform to current period's presentation.
         
         September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
        In millions of dollars Trading
        assets
         Loans Trading
        assets
         Loans 

        Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

         $13,533 $1,638 $14,338 $945 

        Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

          392  (199) 390  (44)

        Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

          249    312   

        Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

          101    267   
                  

                In addition to the amounts reported above, $200$441 million and $72$200 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-valuefair value accounting werewas outstanding as of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively.

                Changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported asInterest revenue on tradingTrading account assets or loansloan interest depending on theirthe balance sheet classifications.classifications of the credit products. The changes in fair value for the nine months ended September 30, 20092010 and 20082009 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a gain of $19 million and a loss of $32 million and $32 million, respectively.

        Certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments

                Citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation. The Company has elected the fair-valuefair value option for certain of these ventures, because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in ourCiti's investment companies, which are reported at fair value. The fair-valuefair value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments. All investments (debt and equity) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value. These investments are classified asInvestments on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

                Citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for underwhich the equity method. The Company elected fair-valuefair value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity. Since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value, the impact of applying the equity method to Citigroup's investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-valuefair value accounting. Thus, this fair-value election had no impact on openingRetained earnings. These investments are classified asOther assets on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

                Changes in the fair values of these investments are classified inOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

        Certain structured liabilities

                The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation or currency risks ("structured liabilities"). The Company elected the fair-value option, because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair-value basis. These positions will continue to be classified as debt, deposits or derivatives (Trading account liabilities) on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form.

                For those structured liabilities classified asLong-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $208 million and $671 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

                The change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

                Related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Income Statement.

        Certain non-structured liabilities

                The Company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ("non-structured liabilities"). The Company has elected the fair-value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings. The election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications. These positions are reported inShort-term borrowings andLong-term debt on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

                For those non-structured liabilities classified asShort-term borrowings for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $41 million and $220 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

                For non-structured liabilities classified asLong-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected, the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeded the aggregate fair value by $637 million and $856 million as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

                Related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Income Statement.


        Table of Contents

        Certain mortgage loans (HFS)

                Citigroup has elected the fair-valuefair value option for certain purchased and originated prime fixed-rate and conforming adjustable-rate first mortgage loans held-for-sale.HFS. These loans are intended for sale or securitization and are hedged with derivative instruments. The Company has elected the fair-valuefair value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications. The fair-value option was not elected for loans held-for-investment, as those loans are not hedged with derivative instruments. This election was effective for applicable instruments originated or purchased on or after September 1, 2007.


        Table of Contents

                The following table provides information about certain mortgage loans HFS carried at fair value:value at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

        In millions of dollars September 30,
        2009
         December 31,
        2008
          September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 

        Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

         $2,857 $4,273  $6,720 $3,338 

        Aggregate fair value in excess of unpaid principal balance

         $87 $138  278 55 

        Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

         $8 $9  1 4 

        Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

         $6 $2  1 3 
                  

                The changes in fair values of these mortgage loans isare reported inOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. The changes in fair value during the nine months ended September 30, 20092010 and September 30, 20082009 due to instrument-specific credit risk resulted in a $6$1 million loss and $6$4 million loss, respectively. Related interest income continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

        Items selected for fair-value accounting

        Certain hybrid financial instrumentsConsolidated VIEs

                The Company has elected to apply fair-value accountingthe fair value option for certain hybrid financialall qualified assets and liabilities whose performance is linked to risks other than interest rate, foreign exchange or inflation (e.g., equity, credit or commodity risks). In addition,of certain VIEs that were consolidated upon the adoption of SFAS 166/167 on January 1, 2010, including certain private label mortgage securitizations, mutual fund deferred sales commissions and collateralized loan obligation VIEs. The Company elected the fair value option for these VIEs as the Company has elected fair-value accountingbelieves this method better reflects the economic risks, since substantially all of the Company's retained interests in these entities are carried at fair value.

                With respect to the consolidated mortgage VIEs, the Company determined the fair value for residual interests retainedthe mortgage loans and long-term debt utilizing internal valuation techniques. The fair value of the long-term debt measured using internal valuation techniques is verified, where possible, to prices obtained from securitizing certain financial assets.

        independent vendors. Vendors compile prices from various sources and may apply matrix pricing for similar securities when no price is observable. Security pricing associated with long-term debt that is verified is classified as Level 2 and non-verified debt is classified as Level 3. The Company has elected fair-value accounting for these instruments because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair-value basis. In addition, the accounting for these instrumentsfair value of mortgage loans of each VIE is simplified under a fair-value approach as it eliminates the complicated operational requirements of bifurcating the embedded derivativesderived from the host contracts and accounting for each separately. The hybrid financial instrumentssecurity pricing. When substantially all of the long-term debt of a VIE is valued using Level 2 inputs, the corresponding mortgage loans are classified asTrading account assets, Loans,Deposits,Trading account liabilities (for prepaid derivatives),Short-term borrowings orLong-Term Debt on Level 2. Otherwise, the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form, while residual interests in certain securitizationsmortgage loans of a VIE are classified asTrading account assets. Level 3.

                For hybrid financial instrumentsWith respect to the consolidated mortgage VIEs for which fair-value accounting has been elected and that are classified asLong-term debt, the aggregate unpaid principal exceeded the aggregate fair value by $2.4 billion and $4.1 billion as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The difference for those instrumentsoption was elected, the mortgage loans are classified asLoans is immaterial.

                Changeson Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The changes in fair value for hybrid financial instruments, which in most cases includes a component for accrued interest,of the loans are recorded inreported asPrincipal transactionsOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Interest accruals for certain hybrid instruments classified as trading assets are recorded separately fromRelated interest revenue is measured based on the change in fair valuecontractual interest rates and reported asInterest revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Information about these mortgage loans is included in the table below. The change in fair value of these loans due to instrument-specific credit risk was a gain of $138 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010.


        Table        The debt issued by these consolidated VIEs is classified as long-term debt on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The changes in fair value for the majority of Contentsthese liabilities are reported inOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income. The aggregate unpaid principal balance of long-term debt of these consolidated VIEs exceeded the aggregate fair value by $1.3 billion as of September 30, 2010.

                The following table provides information about corporate and consumer loans of consolidated VIEs carried at fair value:

         
         September 30, 2010 
        In millions of dollars Corporate
        Loans
         Consumer
        Loans
         

        Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

         $648 $2,372 

        Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

          630  705 

        Balance of non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

          88  197 

        Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due

          133  203 
              

        Mortgage servicing rights

                The Company accounts for mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) at fair value. Fair value for MSRs is determined using an option-adjusted spread valuation approach. This approach consists of projecting servicing cash flows under multiple interest-rate scenarios and discounting these cash flows using risk-adjusted rates. The model assumptions used in the valuation of MSRs include mortgage prepayment speeds and discount rates. The fair value of MSRs is primarily affected by changes in prepayments that result from shifts in mortgage interest rates. In managing this risk, the Company hedges a significant portion of the values of its MSRs through the use of interest-rate derivative contracts, forward-purchase commitments of mortgage-backed securities, and purchased securities classified as trading. See Note 15Note14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussions regarding the accounting and reporting of MSRs.

                These MSRs, which totaled $6.2$3.976 billion and $5.7$6.530 billion as of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively, are classified asMortgage servicing rights on Citigroup's Consolidated Balance Sheet. Changes in fair value of MSRs are recorded inCommissions and feesOther revenue in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.


        Table of Contents

        Certain structured liabilities

                The Company has elected the fair value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates, inflation, currency, equity, referenced credit or commodity risks (structured liabilities). The Company elected the fair value option, because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and, therefore, are managed on a fair value basis. These positions will continue to be classified as debt, deposits or derivatives (Trading account liabilities) on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet according to their legal form.

                The change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income. Changes in fair value for structured debt with embedded equity, referenced credit or commodity underlyings includes an economic component for accrued interest. For structured debt that contains embedded interest rate, inflation or currency risks, related interest expense is measured based on the contracted interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

        Certain non-structured liabilities

                The Company has elected the fair value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates (non-structured liabilities). The Company has elected the fair value option where the interest-rate risk of such liabilities is economically hedged with derivative contracts or the proceeds are used to purchase financial assets that will also be accounted for at fair value through earnings. The election has been made to mitigate accounting mismatches and to achieve operational simplifications. These positions are reported inShort-term borrowings andLong-term debt on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The change in fair value for these non-structured liabilities is reported inPrincipal transactions in the Company's Consolidated Statement of Income.

                Related interest expense continues to be measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

                The following table provides information about long-term debt, excluding the debt issued by the consolidated VIEs at September 30, 2010, carried at fair value at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

        In millions of dollars September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 

        Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

         $21,847 $25,942 

        Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

          2,676  3,399 

                The following table provides information about short-term borrowings carried at fair value:

        In millions of dollars September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 

        Carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet

         $2,494 $639 

        Aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value

          6  53 

        Table of Contents

        19.18.    FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

        Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments

                The table below presents the carrying value and fair value of Citigroup's financial instruments. The disclosure excludes leases, affiliate investments, pension and benefit obligations and insurance policy claim reserves. In addition, contract-holder fund amounts exclude certain insurance contracts. Also as required, the disclosure excludes the effect of taxes, any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the entire holdings of a particular instrument, excess fair value associated with deposits with no fixed maturity and other expenses that would be incurred in a market transaction. In addition, the table excludes the values of non-financial assets and liabilities, as well as a wide range of franchise, relationship and intangible values (but includes mortgage servicing rights), which are integral to a full assessment of Citigroup's financial position and the value of its net assets.

                The fair value represents management's best estimates based on a range of methodologies and assumptions. The carrying value of short-term financial instruments not accounted for at fair value, as well as receivables and payables arising in the ordinary course of business, approximates fair value because of the relatively short period of time between their origination and expected realization. Quoted market prices are used when available for investments and for both trading and end-user derivatives, as well as for liabilities, such as long-term debt, with quoted prices. For performing loans not accounted for at fair value, contractual cash flows are discounted at quoted secondary market rates or estimated market rates if available. Otherwise, sales of comparable loan portfolios or current market origination rates for loans with similar terms and risk characteristics are used. For loans with doubt as to collectability, expected cash flows are discounted using an appropriate rate considering the time of collection and the premium for the uncertainty of the cash flows. This method of estimating fair value does not incorporate the exit-price concept of fair value prescribed by ASC 820-10 (SFAS No. 157). The value of collateral is also considered. For liabilities such as long-term debt not accounted for at fair value and without quoted market prices, market borrowing rates of interest are used to discount contractual cash flows.


         September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008  September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
        In billions of dollars Carrying
        value
         Estimated
        fair value
         Carrying
        value
         Estimated
        fair value
          Carrying
        value
         Estimated
        fair value
         Carrying
        value
         Estimated
        fair value
         

        Assets

          

        Investments

         $261.9 $261.7 $256.0 $251.9  $340.3 $341.9 $306.1 $307.6 

        Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell

         197.4 197.4 184.1 184.1  240.1 240.1 222.0 222.0 

        Trading account assets

         340.7 340.7 377.6 377.6  337.1 337.1 342.8 342.8 

        Loans(1)

         582.7 573.6 660.9 642.7  608.2 593.2 552.5 542.8 

        Other financial assets(2)

         344.9 344.7 316.6 316.6  281.7 281.6 290.9 290.9 
                          

         


         September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008  September 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
        In billions of dollars Carrying
        value
         Estimated
        fair value
         Carrying
        value
         Estimated
        fair value
          Carrying
        value
         Estimated
        fair value
         Carrying
        value
         Estimated
        fair value
         

        Liabilities

          

        Deposits

         $832.6 $832.3 $774.2 $772.9  $850.1 $848.2 $835.9 $834.5 

        Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under agreements to repurchase

         178.2 178.2 205.3 205.3  192.1 192.1 154.3 154.3 

        Trading account liabilities

         130.5 130.5 165.8 165.8  142.0 142.0 137.5 137.5 

        Long-term debt

         379.6 374.9 359.6 317.1  387.3 385.6 364.0 354.8 

        Other financial liabilities(3)

         171.7 171.7 255.6 255.6  185.4 185.4 175.8 175.8 
                          

        (1)
        The carrying value of loans is net of theAllowance for loan losses of $36.4$43.7 billion and $36.0 billion for September 30, 20092010 and $29.6 billion for December 31, 2008.2009, respectively. In addition, the carrying values exclude $3.1$2.5 billion and $3.7$2.9 billion of lease finance receivables at September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively.

        (2)
        Includes cash and due from banks, deposits with banks, brokerage receivables, reinsurance recoverable, mortgage servicing rights,MSRs, separate and variable accounts and other financial instruments included inOther assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for all of which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

        (3)
        Includes brokerage payables, separate and variable accounts, short-term borrowings and other financial instruments included inOther Liabilitiesliabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet, for all of which the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

                Fair values vary from period to period based on changes in a wide range of factors, including interest rates, credit quality, and market perceptions of value and as existing assets and liabilities run off and new transactions are entered into.

                The estimated fair values of loans reflect changes in credit status since the loans were made, changes in interest rates in the case of fixed-rate loans, and premium values at origination of certain loans. The carrying values (reduced by theAllowance for loan losses) exceeded the estimated fair values of Citigroup's loans, in aggregate, by $9.1$14.9 billion and $18.2$9.7 billion at September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively. At September 30, 2009,2010, the carrying values, net of allowances, exceeded the estimated fair values by $7$12.2 billion and $2$2.7 billion for consumer loans and corporate loans, respectively.

                Citigroup has determined that it isThe estimated fair values of the Company's corporate unfunded lending commitments at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were $6.3 billion and $5.0 billion, respectively. The Company does not practicable to estimate the fair value on an ongoing basisvalues of consumer unfunded lending commitments, which are generally cancellable by providing notice to the loss sharing program with the United States Government because the program is a unique contract tailored to fit the specific portfolio of assets held by Citigroup, contains various public policy and other non-financial elements, and provides a significant Tier 1 Capital benefit.borrower.


        Table of Contents


        20.19.    GUARANTEES

                The Company provides a variety of guarantees and indemnifications to Citigroup customers to enhance their credit standing and enable them to complete a wide variety of business transactions. For certain contracts meeting the definition of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize, at inception, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee.

                In addition, the guarantor must disclose the maximum potential amount of future payments the guarantor could be required to make under the guarantee, if there were a total default by the guaranteed parties. The determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. Such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.

                The following tables present information about the Company's guarantees at September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008:2009:

         
         Maximum potential amount of future payments  
         
        In billions of dollars at September 30,
        except carrying value in millions
         Expire within
        1 year
         Expire after
        1 year
         Total amount
        outstanding
         Carrying value
        (in millions)
         

        2009

                     

        Financial standby letters of credit

         $48.8 $48.2 $97.0 $465.7 

        Performance guarantees

          9.1  5.4  14.5  32.5 

        Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees

          6.8  9.6  16.4  855.2 

        Loans sold with recourse

            0.3  0.3  65.6 

        Securities lending indemnifications(1)

          66.1    66.1   

        Credit card merchant processing(1)

          59.4    59.4   

        Custody indemnifications and other

            27.5  27.5  154.6 
                  

        Total

         $190.2 $91.0 $281.2 $1,573.6 
                  



         Maximum potential amount of future payments  
          Maximum potential amount of future payments 
        In billions of dollars at December 31,
        except carrying value in millions
         Expire within
        1 year
         Expire after
        1 year
         Total amount
        outstanding
         Carrying value
        (in millions)
         

        2008

         
        In billions of dollars at September 30,
        except carrying value in millions
         Expire within
        1 year
         Expire after
        1 year
         Total amount
        outstanding
         Carrying value
        (in millions)
         

        2010

         

        Financial standby letters of credit

         $31.6 $62.6 $94.2 $289.0  $21.5 $72.6 $94.1 $251.8 

        Performance guarantees

         9.4 6.9 16.3 23.6  8.4 5.0 13.4 33.6 

        Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees(2)

         7.6 7.2 14.8 1,308.4  3.4 4.6 8.0 929.4 

        Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows(1)

          0.3 0.3  

        Loans sold with recourse

          0.3 0.3 56.4   0.3 0.3 73.6 

        Securities lending indemnifications(1)

         47.6  47.6   73.0  73.0  

        Credit card merchant processing(1)

         56.7  56.7   62.7  62.7  

        Custody indemnifications and other

          21.6 21.6 149.2   34.0 34.0 253.8 
                          

        Total

         $152.9 $98.9 $251.8 $1,826.6  $169.0 $116.5 $285.5 $1,542.2 
                          

        (1)
        The carrying values of guarantees of collections of contractual cash flows, securities lending indemnifications and credit card merchant processing are not material, as the Company has determined that the amount and probability of potential liabilities arising from these guarantees are not significant.

        (2)
        Reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

         
         Maximum potential amount of future payments 
        In billions of dollars at December 31,
        except carrying value in millions
         Expire within
        1 year
         Expire after
        1 year
         Total amount
        outstanding
         Carrying value
        (in millions)
         

        2009

                     

        Financial standby letters of credit

         $41.4 $48.0 $89.4 $438.8 

        Performance guarantees

          9.4  4.5  13.9  32.4 

        Derivative instruments considered to be guarantees

          4.1  3.6  7.7  569.2 

        Loans sold with recourse

            0.3  0.3  76.6 

        Securities lending indemnifications(1)

          64.5    64.5   

        Credit card merchant processing(1)

          59.7    59.7   

        Custody indemnifications and other

            33.5  33.5  121.4 
                  

        Total

         $179.1 $89.9 $269.0 $1,238.4 
                  

        (1)
        The carrying values of securities lending indemnifications and credit card merchant processing are not material, as the Company has determined that the amount and probability of potential liabilities arising from these guarantees are not significant.

        Table of Contents

        Financial Standby Lettersstandby letters of Creditcredit

                Citigroup issues standby letters of credit which substitute its own credit for that of the borrower. If a letter of credit is drawn down, the borrower is obligated to repay Citigroup. Standby letters of credit protect a third party from defaults on contractual obligations. Financial standby letters of credit include guarantees of payment of insurance premiums and reinsurance risks that support industrial revenue bond underwriting and settlement of payment obligations to clearing houses, and also support options and purchases of securities or are in lieu of escrow deposit accounts. Financial standbys also backstop loans, credit facilities, promissory notes and trade acceptances.

        Performance Guaranteesguarantees

                Performance guarantees and letters of credit are issued to guarantee a customer's tender bid on a construction or systems-installation project or to guarantee completion of such projects in accordance with contract terms. They are also issued to support a customer's obligation to supply specified products, commodities, or maintenance or warranty services to a third party.

        Derivative Instruments Consideredinstruments considered to Be Guaranteesbe guarantees

                Derivatives are financial instruments whose cash flows are based on a notional amount or an underlying instrument, where there is little or no initial investment, and whose terms require or permit net settlement. Derivatives may be used for a variety of reasons, including risk management, or to enhance returns. Financial institutions often act as intermediaries for their clients, helping clients reduce their risks. However, derivatives may also be used to take a risk position.

                The derivative instruments considered to be guarantees, which are presented in the tabletables above, include only those instruments that require Citi to make payments to the counterparty based on changes in an underlying that is related to an asset, a liability, or an equity security held by the guaranteed party. More specifically, derivative instruments considered to be guarantees include certain over-the-counter written put options where the counterparty is not a bank, hedge fund or broker-dealer (such counterparties are considered to be


        Table of Contents

        dealers in these markets and may therefore not hold the underlying instruments). However, credit derivatives sold by the Company are excluded from this presentation.presentation, as they are disclosed separately in Note 15. In addition, non-credit derivative contracts that are cash settled and for which the Company is unable to assert that it is probable the counterparty held the underlying instrument at the inception of the contract also are excluded from the disclosure above. The Company's credit derivative portfolio as protection seller (guarantor) is presented in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Derivative Activities."

                In instances where the Company's maximum potential future payment is unlimited, the notional amount of the contract is disclosed.

        Guarantees of Collection of Contractual Cash Flows

                Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows protect investors in credit card receivables securitization trusts from loss of interest relating to insufficient collections on the underlying receivables in the trusts. The notional amount of these guarantees as of December 31, 2008, was $300 million. No such guarantees were outstanding at September 30, 2009.

        Loans Soldsold with Recourserecourse

                Loans sold with recourse represent the Company's obligations to reimburse the buyers for loan losses under certain circumstances. Recourse refers to the clause in a sales agreement under which a lender will fully reimburse the buyer/investor for any losses resulting from the purchased loans. This may be accomplished by the seller's taking back any loans that become delinquent.

        Securities Lending Indemnificationslending indemnifications

                Owners of securities frequently lend those securities for a fee to other parties who may sell them short or deliver them to another party to satisfy some other obligation. Banks may administer such securities lending programs for their clients. Securities lending indemnifications are issued by the bank to guarantee that a securities lending customer will be made whole in the event that the security borrower does not return the security subject to the lending agreement and collateral held is insufficient to cover the market value of the security.

        Credit Card Merchant Processingcard merchant processing

                Credit card merchant processing guarantees represent the Company's indirect obligations in connection with the processing of private label and bankcard transactions on behalf of merchants.

                Citigroup's primary credit card business is the issuance of credit cards to individuals. In addition, the CompanyCompany: (a) provides transaction processing services to various merchants with respect to bankcardits private-label cards and private-label cards. In(b) has potential liability for transaction processing services provided by a third-party related to previously transferred merchant credit card processing contracts. The nature of the eventliability in either case arises as a result of a billing dispute with respect to a bankcard transaction between a merchant and a cardholder that is ultimately resolved in the cardholder's favor, the third party holds the primary contingent liabilityfavor. The merchant is liable to credit or refund the amount to the cardholder and charge backcardholder. In general, if the transaction to the merchant. If the third partycredit card processing company is unable to collect this amount from the merchant itthe credit card processing company bears the loss for the amount of the credit or refund paid to the cardholder.

                TheWith regard to (a) above, the Company continues to have the primary contingent liability with respect to its portfolio of private-label merchants. The risk of loss is mitigated as the cash flows between the third party or the Company and the merchant are settled on a net basis and the third party or the Company has the right to offset any payments with cash flows otherwise due to the merchant. To further mitigate this risk the third party or the Company may delay settlement, require a merchant to make an escrow deposit, delay settlement, or include event triggers to provide the third party or the Company with more financial and operational control in the event of the financial deterioration of the merchant, or require various credit enhancements (including letters of credit and bank guarantees). In the unlikely event that a private labelprivate-label merchant is unable to deliver products, services or a refund to its private labelprivate-label cardholders, Citigroupthe Company is contingently liable to credit or refund cardholders. In addition, although

                With regard to (b) above, the company has a potential liability for bankcard transactions with merchants whose contracts were previously transferred by the Company to a third party holds the primary contingent liability with respectcredit card processor, should that processor fail to the processing of bankcard transactions, in the event that the third party does not have sufficient collateral from the merchant or sufficient financial resources of its own to provide the credit or refunds to the cardholders, Citigroup would be liable to credit or refund the cardholders.perform.

                The Company's maximum potential contingent liability related to both bankcard and private labelprivate-label merchant processing services is estimated to be the total volume of credit card transactions that meet the requirements to be valid chargeback transactions at any given time. At September 30, 20092010 and


        Table of Contents

        December 31, 2008,2009, this maximum potential exposure was estimated to be $59$63 billion and $57$60 billion, respectively.

                However, the Company believes that the maximum exposure is not representative of the actual potential loss exposure based on the Company's historical experience and its position as a secondary guarantor (in the case of bankcards)previously transferred merchant credit card processing contracts). In mostboth cases, this contingent liability is unlikely to arise, as most products and services are delivered when purchased and amounts are refunded when items are returned to merchants. The Company assesses the probability and amount of its contingent liability related to merchant processing based on the financial strength of the primary guarantor, (in the case of bankcards) and the extent and nature of unresolved chargebackscharge-backs and its historical loss experience. At September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the estimated losses incurred and the carrying amounts of the Company's contingent obligations related to merchant processing activities were immaterial.

        Custody Indemnificationsindemnifications

                Custody indemnifications are issued to guarantee that custody clients will be made whole in the event that a third-party subcustodian or depository institution fails to safeguard clients' assets.

        Other

                As of December 31, 2008,        Citigroup carried a reserve of $149 millionhas an accrual related to certain of Visa USA's litigation matters. As


        Table of Contents

        of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the carrying value of the reserveaccrual was $155 million. This reserve$254 million and $121 million, respectively, and the amount is included inOther liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

        Other Guaranteesguarantees and Indemnificationsindemnifications

                The Company, through its credit card business, provides various cardholder protection programs on several of its card products, including programs that provide insurance coverage for rental cars, coverage for certain losses associated with purchased products, price protection for certain purchases and protection for lost luggage. These guarantees are not included in the table, since the total outstanding amount of the guarantees and the Company's maximum exposure to loss cannot be quantified. The protection is limited to certain types of purchases and certain types of losses and it is not possible to quantify the purchases that would qualify for these benefits at any given time. The Company assesses the probability and amount of its potential liability related to these programs based on the extent and nature of its historical loss experience. At September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the actual and estimated losses incurred and the carrying value of the Company's obligations related to these programs were immaterial.

                In the normal course of business, the Company provides standard representations and warranties to counterparties in contracts in connection with numerous transactions and also provides indemnifications that protect the counterparties to the contracts in the event that additional taxes are owed due either to a change in the tax law or an adverse interpretation of the tax law. Counterparties to these transactions provide the Company with comparable indemnifications. While such representations, warranties and tax indemnifications are essential components of many contractual relationships, they do not represent the underlying business purpose for the transactions. The indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms related to the Company's own performance under the terms of a contract and are entered into in the normal course of business based on an assessment that the risk of loss is remote. Often these clauses are intended to ensure that terms of a contract are met at inception (for example, that loans transferred to a counterparty in a sales transaction did in fact meet the conditions specified in the contract at the transfer date). No compensation is received for these standard representations and warranties, and it is not possible to determine their fair value because they rarely, if ever, result in a payment. In many cases, there are no stated or notional amounts included in the indemnification clauses and the contingencies potentially triggering the obligation to indemnify have not occurred and are not expected to occur. There are no amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, related to theseThese indemnifications and they are not included in the table.table above. In addition, the repurchase reserve for Consumer mortgages representations and warranties was $952 million and $295 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and these amounts are included inOther liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

                In addition, the Company is a member of or shareholder in hundreds of value-transfer networks (VTNs) (payment clearing and settlement systems as well as securities exchanges) around the world. As a condition of membership, many of these VTNs require that members stand ready to backstop the net effect on the VTNs of a member's default on its obligations. The Company's potential obligations as a shareholder or member of VTN associations are not considered to be guarantees,excluded from the scope of FIN 45, since the shareholders and members represent subordinated classes of investors in the VTNs. Accordingly, the Company's participation in VTNs is not reported in the table and there are no amounts reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 20092010 or December 31, 20082009 for potential obligations that could arise from the Company's involvement with VTN associations.

                In the sale of an insurance subsidiary, the Company provided an indemnification to an insurance company for policyholder claims and other liabilities relating to a book of long-term care (LTC) business (for the entire term of the LTC policies) that is fully reinsured by another insurance company. The reinsurer has funded two trusts with securities whose fair value (approximately $3.7 billion and $3.3 billion at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) is designed to cover the insurance company's statutory liabilities for the LTC policies. The assets in these trusts are evaluated and adjusted periodically to ensure that the fair value of the assets continues to cover the estimated statutory liabilities related to the LTC policies, as those statutory liabilities change over time. If the reinsurer fails to perform under the reinsurance agreement for any reason, including insolvency, and the assets in the two trusts are insufficient or unavailable to the ceding insurance company, then Citigroup must indemnify the ceding insurance company for any losses actually incurred in connection with the LTC policies. Since


        Table of Contents

        both events would have to occur before Citi would become responsible for any payment to the ceding insurance company pursuant to its indemnification obligation and the likelihood of such events occurring is currently not probable, there is no liability reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 related to this indemnification.

                At September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, the total carrying amounts of the liabilities related to the guarantees and indemnifications included in the table amounted to approximately $1.6$1.5 billion and $1.8$1.2 billion, respectively. The carrying value of derivative instruments is included in eitherTrading account liabilities orOther liabilities, depending upon whether the derivative was entered into for trading or non-trading purposes. The carrying value of financial and performance guarantees is included inOther liabilities. For loans sold with recourse, the carrying value of the liability is included inOther liabilities. In addition, at September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009,Other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet include an allowance for credit losses of $1,074 million$1.102 billion and $887 million$1.157 billion relating to letters of credit and unfunded lending commitments, respectively.

        Collateral

                Cash collateral available to the Company to reimburse losses realized under these guarantees and indemnifications amounted to $36$34 billion at September 30, 20092010 and $33$31 billion at December 31, 2008.2009. Securities and other marketable assets held as collateral amounted to $39$49 billion and $27$43 billion, at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, the majority of which collateral is held to reimburse losses realized under securities lending indemnifications. Additionally, letters of credit in favor of the Company held as collateral amounted to $900 million and $503 million$1.7 billion at September 30, 20092010 and $1.4 billion at December 31, 2008, respectively.2009. Other property may also be available to the Company to cover losses under certain guarantees and indemnifications; however, the value of such property has not been determined.


        Table of Contents

        Performance Riskrisk

                Citigroup evaluates the performance risk of its guarantees based on the assigned referenced counterparty internal or external ratings. Where external ratings are used, investment-grade ratings are considered to be Baa/BBB and above, while anything below is considered non-investment grade. The Citigroup internal ratings are in line with the related external rating system. On certain underlying referenced credits or entities, ratings are not available. Such referenced credits are included in the "Not-rated"not rated category. The maximum potential amount of the future payments related to guarantees and credit derivatives sold is determined to be the notional amount of these contracts, which is the par amount of the assets guaranteed.

                Presented in the tables below isare the maximum potential amountamounts of future payments classified based upon internal and external credit ratings as of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008.2009. As previously mentioned, the determination of the maximum potential future payments is based on the notional amount of the guarantees without consideration of possible recoveries under recourse provisions or from collateral held or pledged. Such amounts bear no relationship to the anticipated losses, if any, on these guarantees.


         Maximum potential amount of future payments  Maximum potential amount of future payments 
        In billions of dollars as of September 30, 2009 Investment
        grade
         Non-investment
        grade
         Not rated Total 
        In billions of dollars as of September 30, 2010 Investment
        grade
         Non-investment grade Not rated Total 

        Financial standby letters of credit

         $48.5 $21.1 $27.4 $97.0  $56.8 $12.5 $24.8 $94.1 

        Performance guarantees

         7.0 3.7 3.8 14.5  6.2 3.5 3.7 13.4 

        Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees

           16.4 16.4    8.0 8.0 

        Loans sold with recourse

           0.3 0.3    0.3 0.3 

        Securities lending indemnifications

           66.1 66.1    73.0 73.0 

        Credit card merchant processing

           59.4 59.4    62.7 62.7 

        Custody indemnifications and other

         22.3 5.2  27.5  27.9 6.1  34.0 
                          

        Total

         $77.8 $30.0 $173.4 $281.2  $90.9 $22.1 $172.5 $285.5 
                          

         


         Maximum potential amount of future payments  Maximum potential amount of future payments 
        In billions of dollars as of December 31, 2008 Investment
        grade
         Non-investment
        grade
         Not rated Total 
        In billions of dollars as of December 31, 2009 Investment
        grade
         Non-investment
        grade
         Not rated Total 

        Financial standby letters of credit

         $49.2 $28.6 $16.4 $94.2  $49.2 $13.5 $26.7 $89.4 

        Performance guarantees

         5.7 5.0 5.6 16.3  6.5 3.7 3.7 13.9 

        Derivative instruments deemed to be guarantees

           14.8 14.8    7.7 7.7 

        Guarantees of collection of contractual cash flows

           0.3 0.3 

        Loans sold with recourse

           0.3 0.3    0.3 0.3 

        Securities lending indemnifications

           47.6 47.6    64.5 64.5 

        Credit card merchant processing

           56.7 56.7    59.7 59.7 

        Custody indemnifications and other

         18.5 3.1  21.6  27.7 5.8  33.5 
                          

        Total

         $73.4 $36.7 $141.7 $251.8  $83.4 $23.0 $162.6 $269.0 
                          

        Table of Contents

        Credit Commitments and Lines of Credit

                The table below summarizes Citigroup's othercredit commitments as of September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008.2009:

        In millions of dollars U.S. Outside of
        U.S.
         September 30,
        2009
         December 31,
        2008
          U.S. Outside of
        U.S.
         September 30,
        2010
         December 31,
        2009
         

        Commercial and similar letters of credit

         $1,691 $5,625 $7,316 $8,215  $1,543 $6,824 $8,367 $7,211 

        One- to four-family residential mortgages

         1,002 260 1,262 937  1,824 366 2,190 1,070 

        Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties

         22,186 2,919 25,105 25,212  18,562 2,964 21,526 23,916 

        Commercial real estate, construction and land development

         1,059 604 1,663 2,702  1,421 371 1,792 1,704 

        Credit card lines

         680,750 134,402 815,152 1,002,437  588,951 122,110 711,061 785,495 

        Commercial and other consumer loan commitments

         172,708 89,451 262,159 309,997  117,805 88,787 206,592 257,342 
                          

        Total

         $879,396 $233,261 $1,112,657 $1,349,500  $730,106 $221,422 $951,528 $1,076,738 
                          

                The majority of unused commitments are contingent upon customers' maintaining specific credit standards. Commercial commitments generally have floating interest rates and fixed expiration dates and may require payment of fees. Such fees (net of certain direct costs) are deferred and, upon exercise of the commitment, amortized over the life of the loan or, if exercise is deemed remote, amortized over the commitment period.

        Commercial and similar letters of credit

                A commercial letter of credit is an instrument by which Citigroup substitutes its credit for that of a customer to enable the customerscustomer to finance the purchase of goods or to incur other commitments. Citigroup issues a letter on behalf of its client to a supplier and agrees to pay themthe supplier upon presentation of documentary evidence that the supplier has performed in accordance with the terms of the letter of credit. When a letter of credit is drawn, the customer is then is required to reimburse Citigroup.

        One- to four-family residential mortgages

                A one- to four-family residential mortgage commitment is a written confirmation from Citigroup to a seller of a property that the bank will advance the specified sums enabling the buyer to complete the purchase.

        Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties

                Revolving open-end loans secured by one- to four-family residential properties are essentially home equity lines of credit. A home equity line of credit is a loan secured by a primary residence or second home to the extent of the excess of fair market value over the debt outstanding for the first mortgage.

        Commercial Real Estate, Constructionreal estate, construction and Land Developmentland development

                Commercial real estate, construction and land development include unused portions of commitments to extend credit for the purpose of financing commercial and multifamily residential properties as well as land development projects.

                Both secured-by-real estatesecured-by-real-estate and unsecured commitments are included in this line. In addition,line, as well as undistributed loan proceeds, where there is an obligation to advance for construction progress are also included in this line.payments. However, this line only includes those extensions of credit that, once funded, will be classified as LoansTotal loans, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

        Credit card lines

                Citigroup provides credit to customers by issuing credit cards. The credit card lines are unconditionally cancellable by the issuer.

        Commercial and other consumer loan commitments

                Commercial and other consumer loan commitments include overdraft and liquidity facilities, as well as commercial commitments to make or purchase loans, to purchase third-party receivables, and to provide note issuance or revolving underwriting facilities.facilities and to invest in the form of equity. Amounts include $130$76 billion and $140$126 billion with an original maturity of less than one year at September 30, 20092010 and December 31, 2008,2009, respectively.

                In addition, included in this line item are highly leveraged financing commitments, which are agreements that provide funding to a borrower with higher levels of debt (measured by the ratio of debt capital to equity capital of the borrower) than is generally considered normal for other companies. This type of financing is commonly employed in corporate acquisitions, management buy-outs and similar transactions.


        Table of Contents


        21.20.    CONTINGENCIES

                The CompanyIn accordance with ASC 450 (formerly SFAS 5), Citigroup establishes accruals for litigation and regulatory matters when it is probable that a defendantloss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, accruals are adjusted from time to time, as appropriate, in numerous lawsuits and other legal proceedings arising outlight of alleged misconduct in connection with certain matters.additional information. In view of the large numberinherent unpredictability of such matters, the uncertainties of the timing and outcome of this type of litigation, the novel issues presented, and the significant amounts involved, it is possible that the ultimate costs of these matters may exceed or be below the Company's litigation reserves. The Company will continue to defend itself vigorously in these cases, and seek to resolve them in the manner management believes is in the best interests of the Company.

                In addition, in the ordinary course of business, Citigroup and its subsidiaries are defendants or co-defendants or parties in various litigation and regulatory matters, incidental to and typicalparticularly where the damages sought are substantial or indeterminate, the investigations or proceedings are in the early stages, or the matters involve novel legal theories or a large number of parties, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, in excess of the businesses in which they are engaged. Inamounts accrued for these matters or predict the timing of their eventual resolution, and the actual costs of resolving litigation and regulatory matters may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those matters.

                Subject to the foregoing, it is the opinion of Citigroup's management, based on current knowledge and after taking into account its current accruals, that the Company's management, the ultimate resolutioneventual outcome of these legal and regulatory proceedingsmatters would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of Citi. Nonetheless, given the Company but, if involving monetary liability, may beinherent unpredictability of litigation and the substantial or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters, an adverse outcome in certain of these matters could, from time to time, have a material to the Company's operatingadverse effect on Citi's consolidated results for anyof operations or cash flows in particular period.quarterly or annual periods.


        Table of Contents


        22.21.    CITIBANK, N.A. STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY

        Statement of Changes in Stockholder's Equity (Unaudited)

         Citibank, N.A. and Subsidiaries 

         Nine Months Ended
        September 30,
          Nine Months Ended September 30, 
        In millions of dollars, except shares 2009 2008  2010 2009 

        Common stock ($20 par value)

          

        Balance, beginning of period—Shares: 37,534,553 in 2009 and 2008

         $751 $751 

        Balance, beginning of period—shares: 37,534,553 in 2010 and 2009

         $751 $751 
                  

        Balance, end of period—Shares: 37,534,553 in 2009 and 2008

         $751 $751 

        Balance, end of period

         $751 $751 
                  

        Surplus

          

        Balance, beginning of period

         $74,767 $69,135  $107,923 $74,767 

        Capital contribution from parent company

         30,492 77  858 30,492 

        Employee benefit plans

         34 107  385 34 
                  

        Balance, end of period

         $105,293 $69,319  $109,166 $105,293 
                  

        Retained earnings

          

        Balance, beginning of period

         $21,735 $31,915  $19,457 $21,735 

        Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)

         402  

        Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)(2)

         (288) 402 
                  

        Adjusted balance, beginning of period

         $22,137 $31,915  $19,169 $22,137 

        Net income (loss)

         (2,270) (1,450)

        Dividends paid

         4 (34)

        Other(2)

         117  

        Net income

         6,419 (2,270)

        Dividends(3)

         9 4 

        Other(4)

          117 
                  

        Balance, end of period

         $19,988 $30,431  $25,597 $19,988 
                  

        Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

          

        Balance, beginning of period

         $(15,895)$(2,495) $(11,532)$(15,895)

        Adjustment to opening balance, net of taxes(1)

         (402)    (402)
                  

        Adjusted balance, beginning of period

         $(16,297)$(2,495) $(11,532)$(16,297)

        Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities available-for-sale, net of taxes

         3,758 (4,971) 2,237 3,758 

        Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of taxes

         850 (2,244)

        Net change in foreign currency translation adjustment, net of taxes

         (134) 850 

        Net change in cash flow hedges, net of taxes

         281 (214) 143 281 

        Pension liability adjustment, net of taxes

         (7) 90  31 (7)
                  

        Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

         $4,882 $(7,339)

        Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

         $2,277 $4,882 
                  

        Balance, end of period

         $(11,415)$(9,834) $(9,255)$(11,415)
                  

        Total Citibank common stockholder's equity and total Citibank stockholder's equity

         $114,617 $90,667 

        Total Citibank stockholder's equity

         $126,259 $114,617 
                  

        Noncontrolling interest

          

        Balance, beginning of period

         $1,082 $1,266  $1,294 $1,082 

        Initial consolidation of a noncontrolling interest

         123  

        Initial origination of a noncontrolling interest

         (75) 123 

        Transactions between Citigroup and the noncontrolling interest shareholders

         (1)  

        Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest shareholders

         46 88  15 46 

        Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest shareholders

         (16) (86) (40) (16)

        Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investments securities, net of tax

         7 3 

        Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in unrealized gains and losses on investment securities, net of tax

         6 7 

        Accumulated other comprehensive income—Net change in FX translation adjustment, net of tax

         15 6  (20) 15 

        All other

         (155) (5) (110) (155)
                  

        Net change in noncontrolling interest

         $20 $6  $(225)$20 
                  

        Balance, end of period

         $1,102 $1,272  $1,069 $1,102 
                  

        Total equity

         $115,719 $91,939  $127,328 $115,719 
                  

        Comprehensive income (loss)

          

        Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interest

         $(2,224)$(1,362) $6,434 $(2,224)

        Net change in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

         4,904 (7,330)

        Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

         2,263 4,904 
                  

        Total comprehensive income (loss)

         $2,680 $(8,692) $8,697 $2,680 

        Comprehensive income attributable to the noncontrolling interest

         68 97  1 68 
                  

        Comprehensive income attributable to Citibank

         $2,612 $(8,789) $8,696 $2,612 
                  

        (1)
        The adjustment to the opening balances forRetained earnings andAccumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in 2009 represents the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASC 320-10-65-1320-10-35-34 (FSP FAS 115-2)115-2 and FAS 124-2).

        (2)
        The adjustment to the opening balance forRetained earnings in 2010 represents the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASC 810,Consolidation (formerly FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities) and ASU 2010-11 (Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives). See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

        (2)(3)
        Common dividends represent a reversal of dividends accrued on forfeitures of previously issued but unvested employee stock awards related to employees who have left Citigroup.

        (4)
        Represents the accounting for the transfers of assets and liabilities between Citibank, N.A. and other affiliates under the common control of Citigroup.

        Table of Contents


        23.22.    SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

                The Company has evaluated subsequent events through November 6, 2009,5, 2010, which is the date its Consolidated Financial Statements were issued.


        24.23.    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTSTATEMENTS SCHEDULES

                These unaudited condensed consolidating financial statementConsolidating Financial Statements schedules are presented for purposes of additional analysis but should be considered in relation to the consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements of Citigroup taken as a whole.

        Citigroup Parent Company

                The holding company, Citigroup Inc.

        Citigroup Global Markets Holdings Inc. (CGMHI)

                Citigroup guarantees various debt obligations of CGMHI as well as all of the outstanding debt obligations under CGMHI's publicly issued debt.

        Citigroup Funding Inc. (CFI)

                CFI is a first-tier subsidiary of Citigroup, which issues commercial paper, medium-term notes and structured equity-linked and credit-linked notes, all of which are guaranteed by Citigroup.

        CitiFinancial Credit Company (CCC)

                An indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. CCC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Associates First Capital Corporation (described below).Associates. Citigroup has issued a full and unconditional guarantee of the outstanding indebtedness of CCC.

        Associates First Capital Corporation (Associates)

                A wholly owned subsidiary of Citigroup. Citigroup has issued a full and unconditional guarantee of the outstanding long-term debt securities and commercial paper of Associates. In addition, Citigroup guaranteed various debt obligations of Citigroup Finance Canada Inc. (CFCI), a wholly owned subsidiary of Associates. CFCI continues to issue debt in the Canadian market supported by a Citigroup guarantee. Associates is the immediate parent company of CCC (described above).CCC.

        Other Citigroup Subsidiaries

                Includes all other subsidiaries of Citigroup, intercompany eliminations, and income/loss from discontinued operations.

        Consolidating Adjustments

                Includes Citigroup parent company elimination of distributed and undistributed income of subsidiaries, investment in subsidiaries and the elimination of CCC, which is included in the Associates column.


        Table of Contents

        CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOMECondensed Consolidating Statements of Income


         Three Months Ended September 30, 2009  Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 
        In millions of dollars Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries,
        eliminations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        consolidated
          Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries,
        eliminations
        and income
        from
        discontinued
        operations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        consolidated
         

        Revenues

          

        Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

         $1,005 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,005)$  $1,650 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,650)$ 
                         

        Interest revenue

         $57 1,682 $ $1,526 $1,759 $15,180 $(1,526)$18,678  $65 $1,569 $8 $1,255 $1,439 $16,290 $(1,255)$19,371 

        Interest revenue—intercompany

         477 (90) 1,053 1,689 96 (1,536) (1,689)   963 661 741 22 97 (2,462) (22)  

        Interest expense

         2,495 644 400 17 84 3,057 (17) 6,680  2,138 522 508 18 66 2,891 (18) 6,125 

        Interest expense—intercompany

         (137) (165) 260 2,212 377 (335) (2,212)   (218) 903 347 463 384 (1,416) (463)  
                                          

        Net interest revenue

         $(1,824)$1,113 $393 $986 $1,394 $10,922 $(986)$11,998  $(892)$805 $(106)$796 $1,806 $12,353 $(796)$13,246 
                                          

        Commissions and fees

         $ $1,229 $ $16 $36 $1,953 $(16)$3,218  $ $1,062 $ $14 $34 $2,152 $(14)$3,248 

        Commissions and fees—intercompany

          188  51 63 (251) (51)    31  37 41 (72) (37)  

        Principal transactions

         317 2,431 (610)  2 (480)  1,660  (194) 2,231 (639)  2 128  1,528 

        Principal transactions—intercompany

         (493) (1,380) 192  (13) 1,694    (3) (1,727) 653  1 1,076   

        Other income

         (1,158) 676 (100) 112 142 3,954 (112) 3,514  (3,915) 170 114 171 178 6,169 (171) 2,716 

        Other income—intercompany

         2,485 23 77  5 (2,590)    4,146 47 (58)  38 (4,173)   
                                          

        Total non-interest revenues

         $1,151 $3,167 $(441)$179 $235 $4,280 $(179)$8,392  $34 $1,814 $70 $222 $294 $5,280 $(222)$7,492 
                                          

        Total revenues, net of interest expense

         $332 $4,280 $(48)$1,165 $1,629 $15,202 $(2,170)$20,390  $792 $2,619 $(36)$1,018 $1,380 $17,633 $(2,668)$20,738 
                                          

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

         $ $58 $ $770 $875 $8,162 $(770)$9,095  $ $(5)$ $550 $586 $5,338 $(550)$5,919 
                                          

        Expenses

          

        Compensation and benefits

         $(44)$1,471 $ $134 $179 $4,530 $(134)$6,136  $15 $1,454 $ $121 $162 $4,486 $(121)$6,117 

        Compensation and benefits— intercompany

         2 68  35 35 (105) (35)  

        Compensation and benefits—intercompany

         2 54  30 30 (86) (30)  

        Other expense

         192 683 1 169 209 4,603 (169) 5,688  50 653 2 2,999 3,032 1,666 (2,999) 5,403 

        Other expense—intercompany

         163 198 2 143 160 (523) (143)   84 130 1 151 160 (375) (151)  
                                          

        Total operating expenses

         $313 $2,420 $3 $481 $583 $8,505 $(481)$11,824  $151 $2,291 $3 $3,301 $3,384 $5,691 $(3,301)$11,520 
                                          

        Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

         $19 $1,802 $(51)$(86)$171 $(1,465)$(919)$(529)

        Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

         $641 $333 $(39)$(2,833)$(2,590)$6,604 $1,183 $3,299 

        Income taxes (benefits)

         (392) 608 (18) (53) 37 (1,357) 53 (1,122) (430) 68 (10) (829) (747) 1,817 829 698 

        Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

         (310)      310   1,097      (1,097)  
                                          

        Income (Loss) from continuing operations

         $101 $1,194 $(33)$(33)$134 $(108)$(662)$593 

        Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

              (418)  (418)

        Income (loss) from continuing operations

         $2,168 $265 $(29)$(2,004)$(1,843)$4,787 $(743)$2,601 

        Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

              (374)  (374)
                                          

        Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

         $101 $1,194 $(33)$(33)$134 $(526)$(662)$175 

        Net income (loss) before attrition of noncontrolling interest

         $2,168 $265 $(29)$(2,004)$(1,843)$4,413 $(743)$2,227 
                                          

        Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

          19    55  74 

        Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

          15    44  59 
                                          

        Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

         $101 $1,175 $(33)$(33)$134 $(581)$(662)$101 

        Citigroup's net income (loss)

         $2,168 $250 $(29)$(2,004)$(1,843)$4,369 $(743)$2,168 
                                          

        Table of Contents

        CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOMECondensed Consolidating Statements of Income


         Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009  Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 
        In millions of dollars Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries,
        eliminations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        consolidated
          Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries,
        eliminations
        and income
        from
        discontinued
        operations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        consolidated
         

        Revenues

          

        Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

         $1,040 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,040)$  $13,254 $ $ $ $ $ $(13,254)$ 
                         

        Interest revenue

         $234 $5,881 $1 $4,732 $5,418 $47,398 $(4,732)$58,932  $208 $4,620 $8 $3,983 $4,568 $51,237 $(3,983)$60,641 

        Interest revenue—intercompany

         1,833 2,079 3,143 46 325 (7,380) (46)   2,010 1,657 2,378 62 288 (6,333) (62)  

        Interest expense

         6,707 2,060 1,365 63 303 10,744 (63) 21,179  6,489 1,619 1,774 65 213 8,700 (65) 18,795 

        Interest expense—intercompany

         (667) 1,635 699 1,677 1,242 (2,909) (1,677)   (623) 1,979 139 1,488 1,024 (2,519) (1,488)  
                                          

        Net interest revenue

         $(3,973)$4,265 $1,080 $3,038 $4,198 $32,183 $(3,038)$37,753  $(3,648)$2,679 $473 $2,492 $3,619 $38,723 $(2,492)$41,846 
                                          

        Commissions and fees

         $ $4,711 $ $38 $95 $8,017 $(38)$12,823  $ $3,274 $ $37 $109 $6,739 $(37)$10,122 

        Commissions and fees—intercompany

          247  86 107 (354) (86)    112  114 127 (239) (114)  

        Principal transactions

         434 1,302 (869)  2 4,894  5,763  (263) 8,278 (138)  (4) 25  7,898 

        Principal transactions—intercompany

         (714) 2,530 133  (99) (1,850)    (6) (4,672) 496  (122) 4,304   

        Other income

         3,514 13,296 (25) 321 489 1,267 (321) 18,541  (4,253) 571 114 385 551 11,381 (385) 8,364 

        Other income—intercompany

         (1,906) (12) 16 2 37 1,865 (2)   4,651 52 (58)  54 (4,699)   
                                          

        Total non-interest revenues

         $1,328 $22,074 $(745)$447 $631 $13,839 $(447)$37,127  $129 $7,615 $414 $536 $715 $17,511 $(536)$26,384 
                                          

        Total revenues, net of interest expense

         $(1,605)$26,339 $335 $3,485 $4,829 $46,022 $(4,525)$74,880  $9,735 $10,294 $887 $3,028 $4,334 $56,234 $(16,282)$68,230 
                                          

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

         $ $96 $ $2,708 $3,044 $28,938 $(2,708)$32,078  $ $22 $ $1,853 $2,038 $19,142 $(1,853)$21,202 
                                          

        Expenses

          

        Compensation and benefits

         $(89)$5,144 $ $393 $514 $13,161 $(393)$18,730  $115 $4,317 $ $405 $551 $13,257 $(405)$18,240 

        Compensation and benefits— intercompany

         5 403  106 106 (514) (106)  

        Compensation and benefits—intercompany

         5 160  97 97 (262) (97)  

        Other expense

         600 2,011 2 358 471 13,694 (358) 16,778  255 2,170 2 3,234 3,351 10,886 (3,234) 16,664 

        Other expense—intercompany

         260 538 7 416 465 (1,270) (416)   239 322 5 471 500 (1,066) (471)  
                                          

        Total operating expenses

         $776 $8,096 $9 $1,273 $1,556 $25,071 $(1,273)$35,508  $614 $6,969 $7 $4,207 $4,499 $22,815 $(4,207)$34,904 
                                          

        Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

         $(2,381)$18,147 $326 $(496)$229 $(7,987)$(544)$7,294 

        Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

         $9,121 $3,303 $880 $(3,032)$(2,203)$14,277 $(10,222)$12,124 

        Income taxes (benefits)

         (1,437) 6,772 97 (201) 52 (4,864) 201 620  (1,906) 1,053 308 (901) (633) 3,724 901 2,546 

        Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

         6,917      (6,917)   (1,734)      1,734  
                                          

        Income (Loss) from continuing operations

         $5,973 $11,375 $229 $(295)$177 $(3,123)$(7,662)$6,674 

        Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

              (677)  (677)

        Income (loss) from continuing operations

         $9,293 $2,250 $572 $(2,131)$(1,570)$10,553 $(9,389)$9,578 

        Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes

              (166)  (166)
                                          

        Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

         $5,973 $11,375 $229 $(295)$177 $(3,800)$(7,662)$5,997 

        Net income (loss) before attrition of noncontrolling interest

         $9,293 $2,250 $572 $(2,131)$(1,570)$10,387 $(9,389)$9,412 
                                          

        Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

          (32)    56  24 

        Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

          31    88  119 
                                          

        Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

         $5,973 $11,407 $229 $(295)$177 $(3,856)$(7,662)$5,973 

        Citigroup's net income (loss)

         $9,293 $2,219 $572 $(2,131)$(1,570)$10,299 $(9,389)$9,293 
                                          

        Table of Contents

        CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOMECondensed Consolidating Statements of Income


         Three Months Ended September 30, 2008  Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 
        In millions of dollars Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries,
        eliminations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        consolidated
          Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries,
        eliminations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        consolidated
         

        Revenues

          

        Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

         $169 $ $ $ $ $ $(169)$  $1,005 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,005)$ 
                         

        Interest revenue

         $226 $4,455 $ $1,819 $2,084 $19,365 $(1,819)$26,130  $57 1,682 $ $1,526 $1,759 $15,180 $(1,526)$18,678 

        Interest revenue—intercompany

         1,098 565 1,269 21 147 (3,079) (21)   477 (90) 1,053 1,689 96 (1,536) (1,689)  

        Interest expense

         2,388 2,740 835 33 154 6,609 (33) 12,726  2,495 644 400 17 84 3,057 (17) 6,680 

        Interest expense—intercompany

         (101) 1,867 (1) 605 490 (2,255) (605)   (137) (165) 260 2,212 377 (335) (2,212)  
                                          

        Net interest revenue

         $(963)$413 $435 $1,202 $1,587 $11,932 $(1,202)$13,404  $(1,824)$1,113 $393 $986 $1,394 $10,922 $(986)$11,998 
                                          

        Commissions and fees

         $ $1,841 $ $20 $43 $1,324 $(20)$3,208  $ $1,229 $ $16 $36 $2,433 $(16)$3,698 

        Commissions and fees—intercompany

         346 21  9 11 (378) (9)    188  51 63 (251) (51)  

        Principal transactions

         (497) (3,318) 2,239  (1) (1,436)  (3,013) 317 2,431 (610)  2 (797)  1,343 

        Principal transactions—intercompany

         335 (900) (1,542)  36 2,071    (493) (1,380) 192  (13) 1,694   

        Other income

         332 784 (130) 65 87 1,586 (65) 2,659  (1,158) 676 (100) 112 142 3,791 (112) 3,351 

        Other income—intercompany

         206 35 97 8 3 (341) (8)   2,485 23 77  5 (2,590)   
                                          

        Total non-interest revenues

         $722 $(1,537)$664 $102 $179 $2,826 $(102)$2,854  $1,151 $3,167 $(441)$179 $235 $4,280 $(179)$8,392 
                                          

        Total revenues, net of interest expense

         $(72)$(1,124)$1,099 $1,304 $1,766 $14,758 $(1,473)$16,258  $332 $4,280 $(48)$1,165 $1,629 $15,202 $(2,170)$20,390 
                                          

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

         $ $7 $ $1,288 $1,368 $7,692 $(1,288)$9,067  $ $58 $ $770 $875 $8,162 $(770)$9,095 
                                          

        Expenses

          

        Compensation and benefits

         $(57)$2,244 $ $174 $232 $5,125 $(174)$7,544  $(44)$1,471 $ $134 $179 $4,530 $(134)$6,136 

        Compensation and benefits— intercompany

         2 226  46 46 (274) (46)   2 68  35 35 (105) (35)  

        Other expense

         42 925 1 159 208 5,287 (159) 6,463  192 683 1 169 209 4,603 (169) 5,688 

        Other expense—intercompany

         451 (120) 3 174 162 (496) (174)   163 198 2 ��143 160 (523) (143)  
                                          

        Total operating expenses

         $438 $3,275 $4 $553 $648 $9,642 $(553)$14,007  $313 $2,420 $3 $481 $583 $8,505 $(481)$11,824 
                                          

        Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

         $(510)$(4,406)$1,095 $(537)$(250)$(2,576)$368 $(6,816)

        Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

         $19 $1,802 $(51)$(86)$171 $(1,465)$(919)$(529)

        Income taxes (benefits)

         (868) (1,893) 376 (185) (77) (833) 185 (3,295) (392) 608 (18) (53) 37 (1,357) 53 (1,122)

        Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

         (3,386)      3,386   (310)      310  
                                          

        Income (Loss) from continuing operations

         $(3,028)$(2,513)$719 $(352)$(173)$(1,743)$3,569 $(3,521)

        Income (loss) from continuing operations

         $101 $1,194 $(33)$(33)$134 $(108)$(662)$593 

        Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

         213     400  613       (418)  (418)
                                          

        Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

         $(2,815)$(2,513)$719 $(352)$(173)$(1,343)$3,569 $(2,908)

        Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

         $101 $1,194 $(33)$(33)$134 $(526)$(662)$175 
                                          

        Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

              (93)  (93)

        Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

          19    55  74 
                                          

        Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

         $(2,815)$(2,513)$719 $(352)$(173)$(1,250)$3,569 $(2,815)

        Citigroup's net income (loss)

         $101 $1,175 $(33)$(33)$134 $(581)$(662)$101 
                                          

        Table of Contents

        CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOMECondensed Consolidating Statements of Income


         Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008  Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 
        In millions of dollars Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries,
        eliminations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        consolidated
          Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries,
        eliminations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        consolidated
         

        Revenues

          

        Dividends from subsidiary banks and bank holding companies

         $1,617 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,617)$  $1,040 $ $ $ $ $ $(1,040)$ 
                         

        Interest revenue

         $544 $15,239 $1 $5,447 $6,278 $60,566 $(5,447)$82,628  $234 $5,881 $1 $4,732 $5,418 $47,398 $(4,732)$58,932 

        Interest revenue—intercompany

         3,508 1,564 3,911 57 441 (9,424) (57)    1,833 2,079 3,143 46 325 (7,380) (46)  

        Interest expense

         6,987 10,076 2,645 108 491 21,951 (108) 42,150  6,707 2,060 1,365 63 303 10,744 (63) 21,179 

        Interest expense—intercompany

         (242) 4,293 186 1,837 1,651 (5,888) (1,837)   (667) 1,635 699 1,677 1,242 (2,909) (1,677)  
                                          

        Net interest revenue

         $(2,693)$2,434 $1,081 $3,559 $4,577 $35,079 $(3,559)$40,478  $(3,973)$4,265 $1,080 $3,038 $4,198 $32,183 $(3,038)$37,753 
                                          

        Commissions and fees

         $ $6,381 $1 $61 $135 $3,831 $(61)$10,348  $ $4,711 $ $38 $95 $6,960 $(38)$11,766 

        Commissions and fees—intercompany

          453  24 32 (485) (24)    247  86 107 (354) (86)  

        Principal transactions

         5 (20,400) 3,524  (1) 1,425  (15,447) 434 1,302 (869)  2 6,175  7,044 

        Principal transactions—intercompany

         115 4,680 (2,647)  26 (2,174)    (714) 2,530 133  (99) (1,850)   

        Other income

         443 2,798 (45) 286 378 7,000 (286) 10,574  3,514 13,296 (25) 321 489 1,043 (321) 18,317 

        Other income—intercompany

         (33) 619 33 21 78 (697) (21)    (1,906) (12) 16 2 37 1,865 (2)  
                                          

        Total non-interest revenues

         $530 $(5,469)$866 $392 $648 $8,900 $(392)$5,475  $1,328 $22,074 $(745)$447 $631 $13,839 $(447)$37,127 
                                          

        Total revenues, net of interest expense

         $(546)$(3,035)$1,947 $3,951 $5,225 $43,979 $(5,568)$45,953  $(1,605)$26,339 $335 $3,485 $4,829 $46,022 $(4,525)$74,880 
                                          

        Provisions for credit losses and for benefits and claims

         $ $307 $ $3,046 $3,315 $18,397 $(3,046)$22,019  $ $96 $ $2,708 $3,044 $28,938 $(2,708)$32,078 
                                          

        Expenses

          

        Compensation and benefits

         $(106)$7,728 $ $545 $747 $16,429 $(545)$24,798  $(89)$5,144 $ $393 $514 $13,161 $(393)$18,730 

        Compensation and benefits— intercompany

         6 693  145 146 (845) (145)   5 403  106 106 (514) (106)  

        Other expense

         158 2,855 2 416 550 16,235 (416) 19,800  600 2,011 2 358 471 13,694 (358) 16,778 

        Other expense—intercompany

         596 711 49 336 367 (1,723) (336)   260 538 7 416 465 (1,270) (416)  
                                          

        Total operating expenses

         $654 $11,987 $51 $1,442 $1,810 $30,096 $(1,442)$44,598  $776 $8,096 $9 $1,273 $1,556 $25,071 $(1,273)$35,508 
                                          

        Income (Loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

         $(1,200)$(15,329)$1,896 $(537)$100 $(4,514)$(1,080)$(20,664)

        Income (loss) before taxes and equity in undistributed income of subsidiaries

         $(2,381)$18,147 $326 $(496)$229 $(7,987)$(544)$7,294 

        Income taxes (benefits)

         (1,643) (6,273) 656 (174) 54 (2,422) 174 (9,628) (1,437) 6,772 97 (201) 52 (4,864) 201 620 

        Equities in undistributed income of subsidiaries

         (11,077)      11,077   6,917      (6,917)  
                                          

        Income (Loss) from continuing operations

         $(10,634)$(9,056)$1,240 $(363)$46 $(2,092)$9,823 $(11,036)

        Income (loss) from continuing operations

         $5,973 $11,375 $229 $(295)$177 $(3,123)$(7,662)$6,674 

        Income from discontinued operations, net of taxes

         213     365  578       (677)  (677)
                                          

        Net income (Loss) before attribution of Noncontrolling Interests

         $(10,421)$(9,056)$1,240 $(363)$46 $(1,727)$9,823 $(10,458)

        Net income (loss) before attribution of noncontrolling interests

         $5,973 $11,375 $229 $(295)$177 $(3,800)$(7,662)$5,997 
                                          

        Net Income (Loss) attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

          (7)    (30)  (37)

        Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests

          (32)    56  24 
                                          

        Citigroup's Net Income (Loss)

         $(10,421)$(9,049)$1,240 $(363)$46 $(1,697)$9,823 $(10,421)

        Citigroup's net income (loss)

         $5,973 $11,407 $229 $(295)$177 $(3,856)$(7,662)$5,973 
                                          

        Table of Contents

        CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETCondensed Consolidating Balance Sheet


         September 30, 2009  September 30, 2010 
        In millions of dollars Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries
        and
        eliminations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        consolidated
          Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries
        and
        eliminations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        consolidated
         

        Assets

          

        Cash and due from banks

         $ $2,798 $ $181 $257 $23,427 $(181)$26,482  $ $1,798 $1 $203 $276 $24,267 $(203)$26,342 

        Cash and due from banks—intercompany

         16 1,609 1 140 159 (1,785) (140)   9 2,935 1 150 168 (3,113) (150)  

        Federal funds sold and resale agreements

          176,406    20,951  197,357   195,153    44,904  240,057 

        Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany

          23,165    (23,165)     18,254    (18,254)   

        Trading account assets

         25 145,444 41  16 195,171  340,697  10 142,688   8 194,392  337,098 

        Trading account assets—intercompany

         1,152 8,592 811  6 (10,561)    66 13,161 121   (13,348)   

        Investments

         11,227 274  2,456 2,720 247,669 (2,456) 261,890  23,824 193  2,537 2,629 313,604 (2,537) 340,250 

        Loans, net of unearned income

          430  43,534 49,907 571,874 (43,534) 622,211   376  34,480 39,513 614,422 (34,480) 654,311 

        Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany

           144,343 3,512 6,716 (151,059) (3,512)     93,278 3,464 8,131 (101,409) (3,464)  

        Allowance for loan losses

          (139)  (3,425) (3,766) (32,511) 3,425 (36,416)  (48)  (3,379) (3,702) (39,924) 3,379 (43,674)
                                          

        Total loans, net

         $ $291 $144,343 $43,621 $52,857 $388,304 $(43,621)$585,795  $ $328 $93,278 $34,565 $43,942 $473,089 $(34,565)$610,637 

        Advances to subsidiaries

         145,529     (145,529)    133,365     (133,365)   

        Investments in subsidiaries

         210,989      (210,989)   207,181      (207,181)  

        Other assets

         12,295 69,947 728 6,161 7,014 362,790 (6,161) 452,774  18,033 70,567 604 4,323 5,332 302,951 (4,323) 397,487 

        Other assets—intercompany

         10,853 54,776 3,235 31 1,353 (70,217) (31)   16,646 40,751 2,397 1 1,877 (61,671) (1)  

        Assets of discontinued operations held for sale

              23,604  23,604       31,409  31,409 
                                          

        Total assets

         $392,086 $483,302 $149,159 $52,590 $64,382 $1,010,659 $(263,579)$1,888,599  $399,134 $485,828 $96,402 $41,779 $54,232 $1,154,865 $(248,960)$1,983,280 
                                ��         

        Liabilities and equity

          

        Deposits

         $ $ $ $ $ $832,603 $ $832,603  $ $ $ $ $ $850,095 $ $850,095 

        Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold

          139,681    38,478  178,159   155,069    36,996  192,065 

        Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany

         185 4,485    (4,670)    185 7,862    (8,047)   

        Trading account liabilities

          77,681 52   52,807  130,540   85,351 135   56,519  142,005 

        Trading account liabilities—intercompany

         989 8,839 1,260   (11,088)    66 10,887 20   (10,973)   

        Short-term borrowings

         1,249 5,554 10,065  434 47,429  64,731  18 3,005 10,967 1 783 72,240 (1) 87,013 

        Short-term borrowings—intercompany

          91,015 80,610 5,135 34,483 (206,108) (5,135)    66,666 30,413 10,747 2,914 (99,993) (10,747)  

        Long-term debt

         214,981 15,403 51,208 1,677 6,348 91,617 (1,677) 379,557  197,591 10,249 50,214 899 4,202 125,074 (899) 387,330 

        Long-term debt—intercompany

         445 46,273 1,208 37,868 15,453 (63,379) (37,868)   357 59,352 2,575 24,820 39,754 (102,038) (24,820)  

        Advances from subsidiaries

         21,958     (21,958)    22,657     (22,657)   

        Other liabilities

         5,819 66,135 651 1,910 1,588 69,863 (1,910) 144,056  5,359 56,611 276 1,882 2,204 65,265 (1,882) 129,715 

        Other liabilities—intercompany

         5,618 9,378 177 700 325 (15,498) (700)   9,988 14,502 189 578 414 (25,093) (578)  

        Liabilities of discontinued operations held for sale

              16,004  16,004       29,874  29,874 
                                          

        Total liabilities

         $251,244 $464,444 $145,231 $47,290 $58,631 $826,100 $(47,290)$1,745,650  $236,221 $469,554 $94,789 $38,927 $50,271 $967,262 $(38,927)$1,818,097 
                                          

        Citigroup stockholder's equity

         $140,842 $18,443 $3,928 $5,300 $5,751 $182,867 $(216,289)$140,842 

        Citigroup stockholders' equity

         162,913 15,808 1,613 2,852 3,961 185,799 (210,033) 162,913 

        Noncontrolling interest

          415    1,692  2,107   466    1,804  2,270 
                                          

        Total equity

         $140,842 $18,858 $3,928 $5,300 $5,751 $184,559 $(216,289)$142,949  $162,913 $16,274 $1,613 $2,852 $3,961 $187,603 $(210,033)$165,183 
                                          

        Total liabilities and equity

         $392,086 $483,302 $149,159 $52,590 $64,382 $1,010,659 $(263,579)$1,888,599  $399,134 $485,828 $96,402 $41,779 $54,232 $1,154,865 $(248,960)$1,983,280 
                                          

        Table of Contents

        CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETCondensed Consolidating Balance Sheet


         December 31, 2008  December 31, 2009 
        In millions of dollars Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries
        and
        eliminations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        consolidated
          Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries
        and
        eliminations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        consolidated
         

        Assets

          

        Cash and due from banks

         $ $3,142 $ $149 $211 $25,900 $(149)$29,253  $ $1,801 $ $198 $297 $23,374 $(198)$25,472 

        Cash and due from banks—intercompany

         13 1,415 1 141 185 (1,614) (141)   5 3,146 1 145 168 (3,320) (145)  

        Federal funds sold and resale agreements

          167,589    16,544  184,133   199,760    22,262  222,022 

        Federal funds sold and resale agreements—intercompany

          31,446    (31,446)     20,626    (20,626)   

        Trading account assets

         20 155,136 88  15 222,376  377,635  26 140,777 71  17 201,882  342,773 

        Trading account assets—intercompany

         818 11,197 4,439  182 (16,636)    196 6,812 788   (7,796)   

        Investments

         25,611 382  2,059 2,366 227,661 (2,059) 256,020  13,318 237  2,293 2,506 290,058 (2,293) 306,119 

        Loans, net of unearned income

          663  48,663 55,387 638,166 (48,663) 694,216   248  42,739 48,821 542,435 (42,739) 591,504 

        Loans, net of unearned income—intercompany

           134,744 3,433 11,129 (145,873) (3,433)     129,317 3,387 7,261 (136,578) (3,387)  

        Allowance for loan losses

          (122)  (3,415) (3,649) (25,845) 3,415 (29,616)  (83)  (3,680) (4,056) (31,894) 3,680 (36,033)
                                          

        Total loans, net

         $ $541 $134,744 $48,681 $62,867 $466,448 $(48,681)$664,600  $ $165 $129,317 $42,446 $52,026 $373,963 $(42,446)$555,471 

        Advances to subsidiaries

         167,043     (167,043)    144,497     (144,497)   

        Investments in subsidiaries

         149,424      (149,424)   210,895      (210,895)  

        Other assets

         12,148 74,740 51 6,156 6,970 332,920 (6,156) 426,829  14,196 69,907 1,186 6,440 7,317 312,183 (6,440) 404,789 

        Other assets—intercompany

         14,998 108,952 3,997 254 504 (128,451) (254)   10,412 38,047 3,168 47 1,383 (53,010) (47)  
                                          

        Total assets

         $370,075 $554,540 $143,320 $57,440 $73,300 $946,659 $(206,864)$1,938,470  $393,545 $481,278 $134,531 $51,569 $63,714 $994,473 $(262,464)$1,856,646 
                                          

        Liabilities and equity

          

        Deposits

         $ $ $ $ $ $774,185 $ $774,185  $ $ $ $ $ $835,903 $ $835,903 

        Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold

          165,914    39,379  205,293   124,522    29,759  154,281 

        Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold—intercompany

         8,673 34,007    (42,680)    185 18,721    (18,906)   

        Trading account liabilities

          70,006 14   95,780  165,800   82,905 115   54,492  137,512 

        Trading account liabilities—intercompany

         732 12,751 2,660   (16,143)    198 7,495 1,082   (8,775)   

        Short-term borrowings

         2,571 9,735 30,994  222 83,169  126,691  1,177 4,593 10,136  379 52,594  68,879 

        Short-term borrowings—intercompany

          87,432 66,615 6,360 39,637 (193,684) (6,360)    69,306 62,336 3,304 33,818 (165,460) (3,304)  

        Long-term debt

         192,290 20,623 37,374 2,214 8,333 100,973 (2,214) 359,593  197,804 13,422 55,499 2,893 7,542 89,752 (2,893) 364,019 

        Long-term debt—intercompany

          60,318 878 40,722 17,655 (78,851) (40,722)   367 62,050 1,039 37,600 14,278 (77,734) (37,600)  

        Advances from subsidiaries

         7,660     (7,660)    30,275     (30,275)   

        Other liabilities

         7,347 75,247 855 1,907 1,808 77,629 (1,907) 162,886  5,985 70,477 585 1,772 1,742 62,290 (1,772) 141,079 

        Other liabilities—intercompany

         9,172 10,213 232 833 332 (19,949) (833)   4,854 7,911 198 1,080 386 (13,349) (1,080)  
                                          

        Total liabilities

         $228,445 $546,246 $139,622 $52,036 $67,987 $812,148 $(52,036)$1,794,448  $240,845 $461,402 $130,990 $46,649 $58,145 $810,291 $(46,649)$1,701,673 
                                          

        Citigroup stockholders' equity

         141,630 7,819 3,698 5,404 5,313 132,594 (154,828) 141,630  152,700 19,448 3,541 4,920 5,569 182,337 (215,815) 152,700 

        Noncontrolling interest

          475    1,917  2,392   428    1,845  2,273 
                                          

        Total equity

         $141,630 $8,294 $3,698 $5,404 $5,313 $134,511 $(154,828)$144,022  $152,700 $19,876 $3,541 $4,920 $5,569 $184,182 $(215,815)$154,973 
                                          

        Total liabilities and equity

         $370,075 $554,540 $$143,320 $57,440 $73,300 $946,659 $(206,864)$1,938,470  $393,545 $481,278 $134,531 $51,569 $63,714 $994,473 $(262,464)$1,856,646 
                                          

        Table of Contents

        CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSCondensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows


         Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009  Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 
        In millions of dollars Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries
        and
        eliminations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        Consolidated
          Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries
        and
        eliminations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        Consolidated
         

        Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

         $(1,854)$18,928 $2,185 $3,312 $3,757 $(36,850)$(3,312)$(13,834)

        Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

         $10,821 $16,902 $1,023 $2,249 $3,161 $(7,626)$(2,249)$24,281 
                                          

        Cash flows from investing activities

          

        Change in loans

         $ $ $(9,324)$1,528 $1,504 $(119,841)$(1,528)$(127,661) $ $26 $35,753 $2,439 $3,210 $17,426 $(2,439)$56,415 

        Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

          163    185,279  185,442   102  1,864 1,864 5,304 (1,864) 7,270 

        Purchases of investments

         (13,777) (13)  (531) (579) (152,746) 531 (167,115) (23,026) (11)  (472) (477) (310,854) 472 (334,368)

        Proceeds from sales of investments

         6,892   398 435 59,563 (398) 66,890  2,565 32  98 208 126,666 (98) 129,471 

        Proceeds from maturities of investments

         20,209   230 309 69,700 (230) 90,218  10,323   261 270 143,076 (261) 153,669 

        Changes in investments and advances—intercompany

         (20,968)   (290) 4,202 16,766 290   11,330 3,536  (77) (870) (13,996) 77  

        Business acquisitions

                  (20)     20   

        Other investing activities

          (775)    (42,291)  (43,066)  (5,245)  (22) (22) 23,461 22 18,194 
                                          

        Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

         $(7,644)$(625)$(9,324)$1,335 $5,871 $16,430 $(1,335)$4,708 

        Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

         $1,172 $(1,560)$35,753 $4,091 $4,183 $(8,897)$(4,091)$30,651 
                                          

        Cash flows from financing activities

          

        Dividends paid

         $(3,235)$ $ $ $ $ $ (3,235) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 

        Dividends paid—intercompany

         (122) (1,000)    1,122   

        Dividends paid-intercompany

          (5,850) (1,500)   7,350   

        Issuance of common stock

                  3,750     (3,750)   

        Issuance of preferred stock

                          

        Treasury stock acquired

         (3)       (3) (5)       (5)

        Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net

         12,235 (2,406) 14,020 (537) (1,985) (15,250) 537 6,614  (6,748) (2,570) (4,792) (994) (2,340) (18,317) 994 (34,767)

        Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—intercompany, net

          (14,450)  (2,854) (2,202) 16,652 2,854    (2,908)  (12,780) 25,476 (22,568) 12,780  

        Change in deposits

              58,418  58,418       14,192  14,192 

        Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party

         (1,339) (4,181) (20,932) (1,225) (226) (29,465) 1,225 (56,143) 11 (1,588) 870  404 (36,818)  (37,121)

        Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany

         2,081 3,583 14,056  (5,154) (14,566)    (8,211) (2,640) (31,353) 7,444 (30,904) 73,108 (7,444)  

        Capital contributions from parent

                          

        Other financing activities

         (116)  (5)  (41) 46  (116) (786)     3,750  2,964 
                                          

        Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

         $9,501 $(18,454)$7,139 $(4,616)$(9,608)$16,957 $4,616 $5,535 

        Net cash used in financing activities

         $(11,989)$(15,556)$(36,775)$(6,330)$(7,364)$16,947 $6,330 $(54,737)
                                          

        Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks

         $     $582  $582  $ $ $ $ $ $624 $ $624 
                                          

        Net cash used in discontinued operations

         $     $238  $238 

        Net cash provided by discontinued operations

         $ $ $ $ $ $51 $ $51 
                                          

        Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

         $3 $(151)$ $31 $20 $(2,643)$(31)$(2,771) $4 $(214)$1 $10 $(20)$1,099 $(10)$870 

        Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

         13 4,557 1 290 396 24,286 (290) 29,253  5 4,947 1 343 464 20,055 (343) 25,472 
                                          

        Cash and due from banks at end of period

         $16 $4,406 $1 $321 $416 $21,643 $(321)$26,482  $9 $4,733 $2 $353 $444 $21,154 $(353)$26,342 
                                          

        Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

          

        Cash paid during the year for:

          

        Income taxes

         $613 $(743)$422 $96 $381 $(1,924)$(96)$(1,251) $(332)$172 $392 $(55)$37 $3,123 $55 $3,392 

        Interest

         6,190 6,006 2,232 2,454 469 6,441 (2,454) 21,338  6,941 3,926 761 1,998 1,189 4,472 (1,998) 17,289 

        Non-cash investing activities:

          

        Transfers to repossessed assets

         $ $ $ $1,217 $1,261 $888 $(1,217)$2,149  $ $220 $ $996 $1,042 $796 $(996)$2,058 
                                          

        Table of Contents

        CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSCondensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows


         Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008  Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 
        In millions of dollars Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries
        and
        eliminations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        Consolidated
          Citigroup
        parent
        company
         CGMHI CFI CCC Associates Other
        Citigroup
        subsidiaries
        and
        eliminations
         Consolidating
        adjustments
         Citigroup
        Consolidated
         

        Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities of continuing operations

         $(1,519)$4,587 $1,981 $3,232 $2,920 $90,977 $(3,232)$98,946 

        Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

         $(1,854)$18,928 $2,185 $3,312 $3,757 $(36,538)$(3,312)$(13,522)
                                          

        Cash flows from investing activities

          

        Change in loans

         $ $67 $1,379 $(3,434)$(2,003)$(187,302) 3,434 $(187,859) $ $ $(9,324)$1,528 $1,504 $(119,841)$(1,528)$(127,661)

        Proceeds from sales and securitizations of loans

          91    203,772  203,863   163    185,279  185,442 

        Purchases of investments

         (167,093) (134)  (945) (1,142) (104,446) 945 (272,815) (13,777) (13)  (531) (579) (152,746) 531 (167,115)

        Proceeds from sales of investments

         11,727   208 473 48,055 (208) 60,255  6,892   398 435 59,563 (398) 66,890 

        Proceeds from maturities of investments

         137,005  2 475 584 56,721 (475) 194,312  20,209   230 309 69,700 (230) 90,218 

        Changes in investments and advances—intercompany

         (20,954)   (1,054) 913 20,041 1,054   (20,968)   (290) 4,202 16,766 290  

        Business acquisitions

                          

        Other investing activities

          (19,046)    23,253  4,207   (775)    (42,291)  (43,066)
                                          

        Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

         $(39,315)$(19,022)$1,381 $(4,750)$(1,175)$60,094 $4,750 $1,963  $(7,644)$(625)$(9,324)$1,335 $5,871 $16,430 $(1,335)$4,708 
                                          

        Cash flows from financing activities

          

        Dividends paid

         $(6,008)$ $ $ $ $ $ $(6,008) $(3,235)$ $ $ $ $ $ (3,235)

        Dividends paid-intercompany

         (180) (84)    264    (122) (1,000)    1,122   

        Issuance of common stock

         4,961       4,961          

        Issuance/(Redemptions) of preferred stock

         27,424       27,424 

        Issuance of preferred stock

                 

        Treasury stock acquired

         (6)     (1)  (7) (3)       (3)

        Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—third-party, net

         14,608 (9,068) 6,188 (720) (2,223) (36,267) 720 (26,762) 12,235 (2,406) 14,020 (537) (1,985) (15,250) 537 6,614 

        Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt—intercompany, net

          23,322  (1,513) (2,181) (21,141) 1,513  

        Proceeds/(Repayments) from issuance of long-term debt-intercompany, net

          (14,450)  (2,854) (2,202) 16,652 2,854  

        Change in deposits

              (32,411)  (32,411)      58,418  58,418 

        Net change in short-term borrowings and other investment banking and brokerage borrowings—third-party

         (3,196) (5,269) (9,096)  (105) (23,967)  (41,633) (1,339) (4,181) (20,932) (1,225) (226) (29,465) 1,225 (56,143)

        Net change in short-term borrowings and other advances—intercompany

         3,622 4,873 (448) 3,724 2,721 (10,768) (3,724)   2,081 3,583 14,056  (5,154) (14,566)   

        Capital contributions from parent

           (1)   1            

        Other financing activities

         (377)       (377) (116)  (5)  (41) 46  (116)
                                          

        Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

         $40,848 $13,774 $(3,357)$1,491 $(1,788)$(124,290)$(1,491)$(74,813) $9,501 $(18,454)$7,139 $(4,616)$(9,608)$16,957 $4,616 $5,535 
                                          

        Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks

         $ $ $ $ $ $(1,105)$ $(1,105) $     $582  $582 
                                          

        Net cash from discontinued operations

         $ $ $ $ $ $(171)$ $(171)

        Net cash used in discontinued operations

         $     $(74)  $(74)
                                          

        Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

         $14 $(661)$5 $(27)$(43)$25,505 $27 $24,820  $3 $(151)$ $31 $20 $(2,643)$(31)$(2,771)

        Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

         19 5,297 2 321 440 32,448 (321) 38,206  13 4,557 1 290 396 24,286 (290) 29,253 
                                          

        Cash and due from banks at end of period

         $33 $4,636 $7 $294 $397 $57,953 (294)$63,026  $16 $4,406 $1 $321 $416 $21,643 $(321)$26,482 
                                          

        Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

          

        Cash paid during the year for:

          

        Income taxes

         $339 $(2,867)$261 $304 $261 $4,129 $(304)$2,123  $613 $(743)$422 $96 $381 $(1,924)$(96)$(1,251)

        Interest

         7,083 14,582 2,916 1,428 252 19,461 (1,428) 44,294  6,190 6,006 2,232 2,454 469 6,441 (2,454) 21,338 

        Non-cash investing activities:

          

        Transfers to repossessed assets

         $ $ $ $1,108 $1,148 $1,426 $(1,108)$2,574  $ $ $ $1,217 $1,261 $888 $(1,217)$2,149 
                                          

        Table of Contents


        PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

        Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

                The following information supplements and amends our discussion set forth under Part I, Item 3 "Legal Proceedings" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008,2009 (2009 Form 10-K), as updated by our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 20092010 and June 30, 2009.2010.

        Subprime Mortgage—RelatedCredit-Crisis-Related Litigation and Other Matters

                As discussed at pages 263-265 of our 2009 Form 10-K, Citigroup and its affiliates continue to defend lawsuits and arbitrations asserting claims for damages and other relief for losses arising from the global financial credit and subprime-mortgage crisis that began in 2007. These actions, which assert a variety of claims under federal and state law, include, among other matters, class actions brought on behalf of putative classes of investors in various securities issued by Citigroup as well as actions asserted by individual investors and counterparties to various transactions, and are pending in various state and federal courts as well as before arbitration tribunals. These actions are at various procedural stages.

                In addition to these litigations and arbitrations, Citigroup continues to cooperate fully in response to subpoenas and requests for information from the Securities Actions.and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Federal Housing Finance Agency, state attorneys general, and other government agencies in connection with various formal and informal inquiries concerning Citigroup's subprime and other mortgage-related conduct and business activities, as well as other business activities affected by the credit crisis. These business activities include, but are not limited to, Citigroup's sponsorship, packaging, issuance, servicing and underwriting of residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations and its origination, sale or other transfer, servicing, and foreclosure of residential mortgages. On July 22, 2009, plaintiffs in BRECHER, ET AL. v. CGMI, ET AL. voluntarily dismissed the claims against the individual defendants and moved to remand the remaining action against Citigroup, CGMI, and the Personnel and Compensation Committee to state court. On September 8, 2009,October 19, 2010, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California ordered that defendants show cause asColumbia entered a Final Judgment approving Citigroup's settlement of the SEC's investigation into certain of Citigroup's 2007 disclosures concerning its subprime-related business activities, pursuant to why there was federal jurisdiction overwhich Citigroup agreed to pay a $75 million civil penalty and maintain certain disclosure policies, practices and procedures for a three-year period. Additional information relating to this action is publicly available in court filings under the case. On September 17, 2009, defendants respondeddocket number 10 Civ. 1277 (D.D.C.) (Huvelle, J.).

                In accordance with ASC 450 (formerly SFAS 5), Citigroup establishes accruals for all litigation and regulatory matters, including matters related to the district court's order.credit crisis, when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, accruals are adjusted from time to time, as appropriate, in light of additional information. The amount of loss ultimately incurred in relation to those matters may be substantially higher or lower than the amounts accrued for those matters.

                On August 7, 2009,Certain of these matters assert claims for substantial or indeterminate damages. The claims asserted in these matters typically are broad, often spanning a multi-year period and sometimes a wide range of business activities, and the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred BRECHER, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. to the Southern District of New York for coordination with IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION.

                On August 19, 2009, KOCH, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL., a putative class action, was filedplaintiffs' alleged damages typically are not quantified or factually supported in the United States District Courtcomplaint. Many of the most significant of these matters remain in very preliminary stages, with few or no substantive legal decisions by the court or tribunal defining the scope of the claims, the class (if any), or the potentially available damages, and fact discovery is still in progress or has not yet begun. In many of these matters, Citigroup has not yet answered the complaint or asserted its defenses. For all these reasons, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, for these matters or predict the Southern Districttiming of California on behalf of participants in Citigroup's Voluntary FA Capital Accumulation Program ("FA CAP Program") against various defendants, including Citigrouptheir eventual resolution.

        Subprime and CGMI, asserting claims under theOther Mortgage-Related Litigation and Other Matters

                Securities Act of 1933, the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Minnesota state law in connection with plaintiffs' acquisition of certain securities through the FA CAP Program.Actions:    On September 30, 2009,2010, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation conditionally transferred KOCH to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York asdistrict court entered a potential tag-along to IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. On October 8, 2009, a consolidated amended complaint was filedscheduling order in BRECHER, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, asserting claims under the federal securities laws and Minnesota and California state law. The complaint purports to consolidate the similar claims asserted in KOCH.

                On August 31, 2009, ASHER, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. and PELLEGRINI, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. were consolidated with IN RE CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION.LITIGATION, and fact discovery has commenced.

                ERISA Actions:    On October 14, 2009, INTERNATIONAL FUND MANAGEMENT S.A., ET AL.September 28, 2010, the Second Circuit held oral argument on Plaintiffs' appeal from the district court's dismissal of IN RE CITIGROUP INC. ERISA LITIGATION. Additional information relating to this action is publicly available in court filings under the consolidated lead docket number 07 Civ. 9790 (S.D.N.Y.) (Stein, J.) and under GRAY v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL. was09 Civ. 3804 (2d Cir.).

                Derivative Actions and Related Proceedings:    On the basis of an investigation, report, and recommendation from an independent committee of Citigroup's Board of Directors, the Board refused certain shareholder demands raising subprime issues. Amended pleadings were filed by several foreign investment funds and fund management companiesin two of the pending derivative actions. Additional information relating to these actions is publicly available in court filings under the index number 650417/09 (N.Y. Super. Ct.) (Fried, J.) and the Cityconsolidated lead docket number 07 Civ. 9841 (S.D.N.Y.) (Stein, J.).

                Counterparty and Investor Actions:    An arbitration hearing has been scheduled for May 2011 in connection with statutory and common law claims asserted by the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority arising out of Richmondits $7.5 billion investment in Citigroup. Discovery in this matter is ongoing.

                In addition, beginning in July 2010, several investors, including Cambridge Place Investment Management, The Charles Schwab Corporation, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis, have filed lawsuits against Citigroup and certain of its affiliates alleging actionable misstatements or omissions in connection with the issuance and underwriting of residential mortgage-backed securities. As a general matter, the plaintiffs in these actions are seeking rescission of their investments or other damages. Additional information relating to these actions is publicly available in court filings under the docket numbers 10 Civ. 11376 (D. Mass.) (Gorton, J.), 10 Civ. 4030 (N.D. Cal.) (Illston, J.), 10 CH 45033 (Ill. Cook County Cir. Ct.), LC 091499 (Cal. L.A. County Super. Ct.) and 10 PL 045071 (Ind. Marion County Super. Ct.).

                The subprime-mortgage-related proceedings described above are in their preliminary stages. Accordingly, Citigroup cannot at this time estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, for these actions or predict the timing of their eventual resolution.


        Table of Contents

        Auction Rate Securities-Related Litigation and Other Matters

                On the basis of an investigation, report, and recommendation from an independent committee of Citigroup's Board of Directors, the Board refused a shareholder demand raising issues related to auction rate securities.

        Research Analyst Litigation

                In HOLMES v. GRUBMAN, No. 10-409 (U.S.), petitioners-plaintiffs submitted a petition for certiorari to the United States DistrictSupreme Court for the Southern Districtseeking review of New York, asserting, among other claims, claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against various defendants, including Citigroup and several current and former Citigroup executives. The claims asserted in this action are similar to those asserted in IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION.

                Derivative Actions.    On August 25, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed without prejudice the complaint in IN RE CITIGROUP INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION for failure to make a pre-suit demand on the Board of Directors and failure to plead demand futility. On September 18, 2009, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint.

                Citigroup has received letters on behalf of purported shareholders demanding that the Board of Directors take remedial action, including the filing of legal claims, with respect to certain of the matters alleged in the subprime mortgage—related securities and derivative litigations, among other matters. The Board has formed a committee to consider the demands asserted in the letters.

                ERISA Actions.    On August 31, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the complaint in IN RE CITIGROUP ERISA LITIGATION for failure to state a claim that defendants breached their fiduciary duties by offering Citigroup stock as an investment option in the ERISA plans and entered judgment in favor of defendants. On September 8, 2009, plaintiffs appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

                Other Matters.    Underwriting Actions.American Home Mortgage. On July 27, 2009, UTAH RETIREMENT SYSTEMS v. STRAUSS, ET AL. was filed inCircuit's decision affirming dismissal of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York asserting, among other claims, claims under the Securities Act of 1933 and Utah state law arising out of an offering of American Home Mortgage common stock underwritten by CGMI.action.

                On July 31, 2009, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York entered an order preliminarily approving settlements reached with all defendants (includingIn DISHER v. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., oral argument on Citigroup and CGMI) in IN RE AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE SECURITIES LITIGATION.

                AIG.    On August 5, 2009, the underwriter defendants, including CGMI and CGML, moved to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint in IN RE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. 2008 SECURITIES LITIGATION.

                Discrimination in Lending Actions. On September 21, 2009, the United States District Court for the Central District of California denied defendant CitiMortgage's motion for summary judgment and granted its motion to strike the jury demand in NAACP v. AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE CO., ET AL.

                Public Nuisance and Related Actions. On August 7, 2009, the City of Cleveland dismissed, without prejudice, its claims against CitiFinancial and CitiMortgage in CITY OF CLEVELAND v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., ET AL.


        Table of Contents

                Counterparty Actions. On October 7, 2009, defendants filed aGlobal Markets Inc.'s motion to dismiss the complaint in AMBAC CREDIT PRODUCTS, LLC v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL.

                Governmental and Regulatory Matters.    Citigroup and certain of its affiliates and current and former employees are subject to formal and informal investigations, as well as subpoenas and/or requestshas been scheduled for November 16, 2010. Additional information from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies relating to subprime mortgage—related activities. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully and are engagedthis action is publicly available in efforts to resolve certain of these matters.court filings under docket number 04-L-265 (Cir. Ct. 3d Jud. Cir. Madison County Ill.).

        Auction Rate Securities—RelatedAdelphia Litigation and Other Matters

                Securities Actions.    On July 23, 2009, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order transferring K-V PHARMACEUTICAL CO. v. CGMI from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for coordination with IN RE CITIGROUP AUCTION RATE SECURITIES LITIGATION. On August 24, 2009, CGMI moved to dismiss the complaint.

                On September 11, 2009,22, 2010, the United States District CourtAdelphia Recovery Trust agreed in principle to settle its claims against numerous pre-petition lenders and investment banks, including Citigroup, in the action entitled ADELPHIA RECOVERY TRUST v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A., ET AL., 05 Civ. 9050 (S.D.N.Y.) (McKenna, J.). The agreement in principle is subject to execution of a final settlement agreement and court approval.

        Terra Firma Litigation

                On September 15, 2010, the district court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Citigroup's motion for the Southern District of New York dismissed without prejudice the complaint in IN RE CITIGROUP AUCTION RATE SECURITIES LITIGATION.summary judgment. Plaintiffs' claims for negligent misrepresentation and tortious interference were dismissed. On October 15, 2009, lead plaintiff filed18, 2010, a second consolidated amended complaint assertingjury trial commenced on plaintiffs' remaining claims under Sections 10for fraudulent misrepresentation and 20 offraudulent concealment. The court dismissed the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                On October 2, 2009,fraudulent concealment claim before sending the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred OCWEN FINANCIAL CORP., ET AL. v. CGMIcase to the United States District Court forjury. On November 4, 2010, the Southern Districtjury returned a verdict on the fraudulent misrepresentation claim in favor of New York for coordination with IN RE CITIGROUP AUCTION RATE SECURITIES LITIGATION.Citi. Additional information regarding the action is publicly available in court filings under docket number 09 Civ. 10459 (S.D.N.Y.) (Rakoff, J.).

                Derivative Actions.Student Loan Corporation Litigation    On

                Beginning in September, 10, 2009, the United States District Court for the Southern Districtthree shareholders of New York dismissed without prejudice the complaintStudent Loan Corporation (SLC) filed putative class actions in LOUISIANA MUNICIPAL POLICE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. PANDIT, ET AL. for failure to make a pre-suit demand on theDelaware and Connecticut against SLC and its Board of Directors, CBNA, Citigroup Inc., and failureDiscover Financial Services seeking to plead demand futility. On September 16, 2009, Citigroup received a letter on behalf of plaintiff demandingenjoin the SLM Transaction, the DFS Merger and the CBNA Transaction. Among other things, plaintiffs allege that the Boardindividual defendants and CBNA breached their fiduciary duties by failing to maximize the value to be received by SLC's stockholders, and that Citigroup Inc. aided and abetted the other defendants' breaches of Directors take remedial action, including the filing of legal claims, with respect to the matters allegedfiduciary duties. Plaintiffs in the dismissed complaint. The Board has formed a committee to consider the demands asserted in the letter. On September 23, 2009, plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the district court's order of dismissal.

                Governmental and Regulatory Actions.    Citigroup and certain of its affiliates and current and former employeesthese actions are subject to formal and informal investigations, as well as subpoenas and/or requests for information, from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies relating to auction rate securities. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully and are engaged in discussions on these matters.

        Falcon and ASTA/MAT-Related Litigation and Other Matters

                ECA Acquisitions, Inc., et al. v. MAT Three LLC, et al.    On September 14, 2009, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint.

                Governmental and Regulatory Matters.    Citigroup and certain of its affiliates are subject to formal and informal investigations, as well as subpoenas and/or requests for information, from various governmental and self-regulatory agencies relating to the marketing and management of the Falcon and ASTA/MAT funds. Citigroup and its affiliates are cooperating fully and are engaged in discussions on these matters.

        Adelphia Communications Corporation

                Trial of the Adelphia Recovery Trust's claims against Citigroup and numerous other defendants is scheduled to begin in April 2010.

        IPO Securities Litigation

                In October 2009, the District Court entered an order granting final approval of the settlement.

        Other Matters

                Destiny Litigations.    On June 9 and 12, 2009, two actions—DESTINY USA HOLDINGS, LLC v. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS REALTY CORP. and CONGEL, ET. AL. v. CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS REALTY CORP.—were filed in New York State Supreme Court, Onondaga County, against Citigroup Global Markets Realty Corp. (CGMRC), respectively relating to CGMRC's issuance of Deficiency and Default Notices (the "Notices") pursuant to a construction loan agreement with Destiny USA Holdings, LLC (Destiny). Destiny seeks declaratory and injunctive relief and damages for CGMRC's alleged breach of the loan agreement. On July 17, 2009, the court granted Destiny's motion for a preliminary injunction, vacated the Notices, and directed CGMRC to pay all sums due under Destiny's existing funding requests and to pay all future sums due as requested under the loan agreement. That order has been stayed pending the outcome of CGMRC's state court appeal.

                Investor Actions.    Investors in municipal bonds and other instruments affected by the collapse of the credit markets have sued Citigroup on a variety of theories. On August 10, 2009, certain such investors, a Norwegian securities firm and seven Norwegian municipalities, filed an action—TERRA SECURITIES ASA KONKURSBO, ET AL. v. CITIGROUP INC., ET AL.—in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Citigroup, CGMI and Citigroup Alternative Investments LLC, asserting claims under Sections 10 and 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and state law arising out of the municipalities' investment in certain notes. On October 7, 2009, defendants filed a motion to dismiss.

                Japan Regulatory Matters.    Beginning in late 2008, certain Citigroup affiliates received requests for information from Japanese regulators relating to the accuracy of their large shareholding reporting in Japan. These Citigroup affiliates are cooperating fully with such requests and,seeking, among other things, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against the consummation of the Transactions by the defendants, compensatory damages, and costs and disbursements. Although it is the opinion of Citigroup's management, based on current knowledge, that the eventual outcome of these matters would not be likely to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of Citi, in the third quarter of 2009 filed approximately 900 public reports in Japan correcting and supplementing previous large


        Table of Contents

        shareholding reports. Administrative fines and other penalties may be imposed against theseevent an order preliminarily or permanently enjoining the transactions were entered, the benefits to Citigroup affiliates.

                Lehman Brothers—Structured Notes.    Retail customers outside of the United States continue to file, and threaten to file, claims forSLM Transaction, the loss in value of their investments. There are currently 99 civil actions pending in six European countries related to the distribution of Lehman structured notes. The first court hearing in the Belgian criminal case (in which more than 1300 customers are expected to file as civil complainants seeking compensation) is expected to take place on December 1, 2009. A criminal investigation has begun in Poland,DFS Merger and the criminal investigations in Greece continue. Scrutiny by regulatory authorities outside of the United States is ongoing, and there have been a number of adverse regulatory findings.CBNA Transaction would be delayed or not achieved.


                Pension Plan Litigation.    On October 19, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs and dismissed plaintiffs' complaint. The Second Circuit held that Citigroup's pension plan did not violate ERISA's minimum benefit accrual rules and that there had been no violation of ERISA's notice requirements.

                W.R. Huff Asset Management Co., LLC v. Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co., L.P.    On August 6, 2009, the Circuit Court of Jefferson County, Alabama, granted defendant Robinson Humphrey Co. LLC's motion to strike the Fourth Amended Complaint on statute of limitations grounds, thereby dismissing Robinson Humphrey Co. LLC from the case. On August 25, 2009, the case was consolidated for discovery purposes, but not for trial, with the related case against Salomon Brothers, Inc., 27001 PARTNERSHIP, ET AL. v. BT SECURITIES CORP., ET AL. Trial in the 27001 PARTNERSHIP action remains scheduled to commence in February 2010. On September 18, 2009, defendants Salomon Brothers, Inc. and Chemical Securities, Inc. moved for summary judgment, and plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment.

        Settlement Payments

                Any paymentsPayments required by Citigroup or its affiliates in connection with the settlement agreements described above either have been made or are covered by existing litigation reserves.accruals. Additional lawsuits containing claims similar to those described above may be filed in the future.


        Table of Contents

        Item 1A.    Risk Factors

                There are no material changes fromFor a discussion of the risk factors set forth underaffecting Citigroup, see "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in our1A of Citi's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.2009.


        Table of Contents

        Item 2.    UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

        Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

                None.

        (c)   Share Repurchases

                Under its long-standing repurchase program, the CompanyCitigroup may buy back common shares in the market or otherwise from time to time. This program may beis used for many purposes, including to offsetoffsetting dilution from stock-based compensation programs.

                The following table summarizes the Company'sCitigroup's share repurchases during the first nine months of 2009:2010:

        In millions, except per share amounts Total shares purchased(1) Average price paid per share Approximate
        dollar value of
        shares that may
        yet be purchased
        under the plans or
        programs
         

        First quarter 2009

                  
         

        Open market repurchases(1)

          0.2 $3.03 $6,741 
         

        Employee transactions(2)

          10.7  3.56  N/A 
                

        Total first quarter 2009

          10.9 $3.55 $6,741 
                

        Second quarter 2009

                  
         

        Open market repurchases(1)

          0.2 $3.27 $6,740 
         

        Employee transactions(2)

          4.4  3.67  N/A 
                

        Total second quarter 2009

          4.6 $3.65 $6,740 
                

        July 2009

                  
         

        Open market repurchases(1)

          0.4 $3.09 $6,739 
         

        Employee transactions(2)

          1.1  3.08  N/A 

        August 2009

                  
         

        Open market repurchases(1)

           $ $6,739 
         

        Employee transactions(2)

          0.1  3.66  N/A 

        September 2009

                  
         

        Open market repurchases(1)

          0.1 $4.67 $6,739 
         

        Employee transactions(2)

          0.1  4.52  N/A 
                

        Third quarter 2009

                  
         

        Open market repurchases(1)

          0.5 $3.21 $6,739 
         

        Employee transactions(2)

          1.3  3.22  N/A 
                

        Total third quarter 2009

          1.8 $3.22 $6,739 
                

        Year-to-date 2009

                  
         

        Open market repurchases(1)

          0.9 $3.18 $6,739 
         

        Employee transactions(2)

          16.4  3.56  N/A 
                

        Total year-to-date 2009

          17.3 $3.54 $6,739 
                
        In millions, except per share amounts Total shares
        purchased(1)
         Average
        price paid
        per share
         Approximate dollar
        value of shares that
        may yet be purchased
        under the plan or
        programs
         

        First quarter 2010

                  
         

        Open market repurchases(1)

           $ $6,739 
         

        Employee transactions(2)

          12.5  3.57  N/A 

        Total first quarter 2010

          12.5 $3.57 $6,739 
                

        Second quarter 2010

                  
         

        Open market repurchases(1)

           $ $6,739 
         

        Employee transactions(2)

          121.2  4.93  N/A 

        Total second quarter 2010

          121.2 $4.93 $6,739 
                

        July 2010

                  
         

        Open market repurchases(1)

           $ $6,739 
         

        Employee transactions(2)

          0.3  3.99  N/A 

        August 2010

                  
         

        Open market repurchases(1)

           $ $6,739 
         

        Employee transactions(2)

          0.1  4.01  N/A 

        September 2010

                  
         

        Open market repurchases(1)

           $ $6,739 
         

        Employee transactions(2)

          13.9  3.95  N/A 
                

        Third quarter 2010

                  
         

        Open market repurchases(1)

           $ $6,739 
         

        Employee transactions(2)

          14.3  3.95  N/A 
                

        Total third quarter 2010

          14.3 $3.95 $6,739 
                

        Year-to-date 2010

                  
         

        Open market repurchases(1)

           $ $6,739 
                
         

        Employee transactions(2)

          148.0  4.72  N/A 
                

        Total year-to-date 2010

          148.0 $4.72 $6,739 
                

        (1)
        All openOpen market repurchases werewould be transacted under an existing authorized share repurchase plan. On April 17, 2006,Since 2000, the Board of Directors has authorized up to an additional $10 billion in share repurchases. Shares repurchasedthe repurchase of shares in the first, second and third quartersaggregate amount of 2009 relate to customer fails/errors.$40 billion under Citi's existing share repurchase plan.

        (2)
        Consists of shares added to treasury stock related to activity on employee stock option program exercises, where the employee delivers existing shares to cover the option exercise, or under the Company'sCiti's employee restricted or deferred stock program, where shares are withheld to satisfy tax requirements.

        N/A Not applicable.applicable

                In accordance with the recent exchange agreements with the USG, the Company agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $0.01 per share per quarter forFor so long as the USGU.S. government holds any debtCitigroup common stock or trust preferred securities, Citigroup has generally agreed not to acquire, repurchase or redeem any Citigroup equity security of Citigroup (or any affiliate thereof) acquired by the USG in connectionor trust preferred securities, other than pursuant to administrating its employee benefit plans or other customary exceptions, or with the public and private exchange offers, without the consent of the USG. Any dividend on Citi's outstanding common stock would need to be made in compliance with Citi's obligations to any remaining outstanding preferred stock. In addition, pursuant to various of its agreements with the USG, the Company agreed not to repurchase its common stock subject to certain limited exceptions, including in the ordinary course of business as part of employee benefit programs, without the consent of the USG.U.S. government.


        Table of Contents


        Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

                On the July 24, 2009 voting deadline for Citigroup's Preferred Proxy Statement dated June 18, 2009, the votes cast on the proposals to amend the Company's restated certificate of incorporation and the certificates of designation of certain series of the Company's preferred stock did not meet the required quorum of a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company's common stock. As a result, the proposals were not approved.

                Set forth below, with respect to the proposals covered by Citigroup's Preferred Proxy Statement dated June 18, 2009, are the number of votes consenting to approve the proposal, the number of votes withholding consent, and the number of abstentions.

         
          
         CONSENT WITHHOLD
        CONSENT
         ABSTAIN 

        (1)

         Proposal to eliminate certain requirements with respect to the declaration and payment of dividends on the Company's preferred stock.   1,616,485,022  133,242,379  188,213,673 

        (2)

         Proposal to eliminate the right of holders of the Company's preferred stock to elect two directors if dividends on that preferred stock have not been paid.   1,608,466,652  137,116,210  192,358,085 

        (3)

         Proposal to clarify that shares of certain series of the Company's preferred stock acquired by the Company will be restored to the status of authorized but unissued shares without designation as to series.   1,134,202,301  607,909,223  195,824,857 

        (4)

         Proposal to increase the number of authorized shares of preferred stock from 30 million to 2 billion.   1,105,887,808  629,622,756  192,425,539 

                On September 3, 2009, the Company announced that its common stockholders had approved the three proposed amendments to the Company's restated certificate of incorporation submitted to common stockholders in Citigroup's Common Proxy Statement dated June 18, 2009.

                Set forth below, with respect to the proposals covered by Citigroup's Common Proxy Statement dated June 18, 2009, are the number of votes consenting to approve the proposal, the number of votes withholding consent, and the number of abstentions.

         
          
         CONSENT WITHHOLD
        CONSENT
         ABSTAIN 

        (1)

         Proposal to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 15 billion to 60 billion shares.   7,056,506,251  188,694,489  26,840,344 

        (2)

         Proposal to effect a reverse stock split of the Company's common stock at any time prior to June 30, 2010 at one of seven reverse split ratios, at the sole discretion of the Company's Board of Directors.   8,558,930,213  537,925,274  78,420,206 

        (3)

         Proposal to eliminate the voting rights of shares of common stock with respect to any amendment to the Company's restated certificate of incorporation that relates solely to the terms of one or more outstanding series of the Company's preferred stock.   6,629,778,336  604,659,624  37,525,290 

        Table of Contents


        Item 6.    Exhibits

                See Exhibit Index.


        Table of Contents


        SIGNATURES

                Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 6th5th day of November, 2009.2010.


         

         

        CITIGROUP INC.
            (Registrant)

         

         

        By

         

        /s/ JOHN C. GERSPACH

        John C. Gerspach
        Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Financial Officer)

         

         

        By

         

        /s/ JEFFREY R. WALSH

        Jeffrey R. Walsh
        Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
        (Principal Accounting Officer)

        Table of Contents


        EXHIBIT INDEX

         2.01 Amended and Restated Joint Venture Contribution and Formation Agreement, dated May 29, 2009, by and among Citigroup Inc. (the Company), Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney Holdings LLC, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 3, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

         

        2.02

         

        Share Purchase Agreement, dated May 1, 2009, by and among Nikko Citi Holdings Inc., Nikko Cordial Securities Inc., Nikko Citi Business Services Inc., Nikko Citigroup Limited, and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.02 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

         

        2.03


        Share Purchase Agreement, dated July 11, 2008, by and between Citigroup Global Markets Finance Corporation & Co. Beschrankt Haftende KG, CM Akquisitions GmbH, and Banque Federative du Credit Mutuel S.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.01 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).


        3.01

        +

        Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, dated Octoberincorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009.2009 (File No. 1-9924).

         

        3.02

         

        By-Laws of the Company, as amended, effective October 16, 2007,December 15, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 19, 2007December 16, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

         

        4.01

         

        Warrant, dated October 28, 2008, issued by the Company to the United States Department of the Treasury (the UST), incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 30, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).

         

        4.02

         

        Warrant, dated December 31, 2008, issued by the Company to the UST, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 31, 2008 (File No. 1-9924).

         

        4.03

         

        Warrant, dated January 15, 2009, issued by the Company to the UST, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 16, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

         

        4.04

         

        Tax Benefits Preservation Plan, dated June 9, 2009, between the Company and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 10, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).

         

        10.014.05

        +

        Capital Securities Guarantee Agreement, dated as of July 30, 2009, between the Company, as Guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as Guarantee Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.03 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 30, 2009 (File No. 1-9924).


        10.01+


        Form of Citigroup Equity or Deferred Cash Award Agreement (effective November 1, 2009)2010).

         

        12.0110.02+

        +

        Form of 2010 Citi Stock Payment Program Notification for Awards Granted on September 30, 2010.


        10.03+


        Form of 2010 Citi Stock Payment Program Notification for Awards Granted in October, November and December 2010.


        10.04+


        Form of Citi Long-Term Restricted Stock Award Agreement (effective November 1, 2010).


        12.01+


        Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges.

         

        12.0212.02+

        +

        Calculation of Ratio of Income to Fixed Charges (including preferred stock dividends).

         

        31.0131.01+

        +

        Certification of principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

         

        31.0231.02+

        +

        Certification of principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

         

        32.0132.01+

        +

        Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

         

        99.01101.01+

        +

        Residual Value Obligation Certificate.


        101.01

        +

        Financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Citigroup Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2009,2010, filed on November 6, 2009,5, 2010, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statement of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Balance





        Table of Contents

        Sheet, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements tagged as blocks of text.Statements.

        The total amount of securities authorized pursuant to any instrument defining rights of holders of long-term debt of the Company does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company will furnish copies of any such instrument to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

        +
        Filed herewith