Techs Loanstar, Inc.  (“Techs” or the “Company”) was incorporated on April 7, 2006 in the State of Nevada. The fiscal year end of the Company is April 30. The Company was initially organized to provide the loan management service and software for the equity and payday loan industry.

Pursuant to an Agreement Concerning the Exchange of Securities dated February 10, 2010(the "Share Exchange Agreement"), by and between the Company and ZenZuu USA, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("ZZUSA"), the Company and ZZUSA entered into a share exchange whereby all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of ZZUSA, were exchanged for like securities of the Company, (the "Share Exchange"). On February 17, 2010, the company filed the Articles of Exchange with the Nevada Secretary of State (the "Articles of Exchange," and together with the Share Exchange Agreement, the "Plan of Exchange").

Immediately prior to the Share Exchange the Company had 40,400,000 shares of common stock outstanding.  Upon closing the Company retired 28,000,000 shares of common stock.  Immediately prior to the effective time of the Share Exchange, ZZUSA had 46,750 shares outstanding of its common stock ("ZZUSA Common Stock") and no shares of preferred stock. In accordance with the Plan of Exchange, all of the shares of ZZUSA Common Stock were acquired by the Company in exchange for 25,000,000 shares of company common stock, par value $.001 per share ("Common Stock"). Accordingly, after giving effect to the Share Exchange, the Company had 37,400,000 shares of Common Stock outstanding.  As a result of the Share Exchange, the former ZZUSA shareholders immediately after the closing of the Share Exchange together held app roximatelyapproximately 66.8% of the Company’s outstanding voting power.  Accordingly, the Share Exchange constitutes a change of control of the Registrant.

Since there was a change in control of the Company after the Share Exchange, the transaction constituted a reverse acquisition for accounting purposes, as contemplated by ASC 805-40 and corresponding ASC-10-55-10, 12 and 13.  Under these procedures the entity that issued the shares (Techs- the legal acquirer) is identified as the accounting acquire, and the entity whose shares are acquired (ZenZuu) is the accounting acquirer.

In addition, Techs was characterized as a non-operating public shell company, pursuant to SEC reporting rules. The SEC staff considers a reverse-acquisition with a public shell to be a capital transaction, in substance, rather than a business combination. The transaction is effectively a reverse recapitalization, equivalent to the issuance of stock by the private company for the net monetary assets of the shell corporation accompanied by a recapitalization. The accounting is similar to that resulting from a reverse acquisition, except that the transaction was consummated at book value and no goodwill or intangible assets were recognized.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on raising capital to fund its business plan and ultimately to attain profitable operations.  Accordingly, these factors raise substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  ZenZuu and ZZPartners, Inc. (“ZZP” and the predecessor to ZenZuu) has funded its initial operations by way of issuing notes payable (including related parties) and convertible notes accumulating approximately $1,126,000$1,219,000 since its inception.

These financial statements are presented in United States dollars and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period.  Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Basic earnings (loss) per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Stock options, warrants and common stock underlying convertible promissory notes are not considered in the calculations for the periods ending OctoberJanuary 31, 2011 and April 30, 2010, as the impact of the potential common shares would be antidilutive and decrease loss per share.  Therefore, diluted loss per share presented for the periods ended OctoberJanuary 31, 20102011 and April 30 2010 is equal to basic loss per share.

The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes under ASC 740, Income Taxes.  Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax balances and tax loss carry-forwards.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted or substantially enacted tax rates expected to apply to the taxable income in the years in which those differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the date of enactment or substantive enactment.

Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted The “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (ASC 105). This standard establishes only two levels of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), authoritative and nonauthoritative. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) became the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification became nonauthoritative. As the Codification was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 105-10, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – Overall (“ASC 105-10”). ASC 105-10 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. All guidance contained in the Codification carries an equal level of authority.

10

NOTE 3 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(continued)

The Codification superseded all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification is non-authoritative. The FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates (“ASUs”). The FASB will not consider ASUs as authoritative in their own right. ASUs will serve only to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. References made to FASB guidance throughout this document have been updated for the Codification.

Effective July 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB ASU No. 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) (“ASU 2009-05”). ASU 2009-05 provided amendments to ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of liabilities. ASU 2009-05 provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using certain techniques. ASU 2009-05 also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not

The first update, as codified in ASC 820-10-65, provides additional guidelines for estimating fair value in accordance with fair value accounting. The second accounting update, as codified in ASC 320-10-65, changes accounting requirements for

Effective June 30, 2009, the Company adopted a new accounting standard for subsequent events, as codified in ASC 855-10. The update modifies the names of the two types of subsequent events either as recognized subsequent events (previously referred to in practice as Type I subsequent events) or non-recognized subsequent events (previously referred to in practice as Type II subsequent events). In addition, the standard modifies the definition of subsequent events to refer to events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date, but before the financial statements are issued (for public entities) or available to be issued (for nonpublic entities). It also requires the disclosure of the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated. The update did not result in significant changes in the practice of subsequent event disclosures, and therefore the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-11, "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Scope Exception Related to Embedded Credit Derivatives," ("ASU 2010-11") (codified within ASC 815 - Derivatives and Hedging). ASU 2010-11 improves disclosures originally required under FAS No. 161. ASU 2010-11 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after June 15, 2010. The Company will adopt ASU 2010-11 on August 1, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-11 is not expected to have any material impact on the  Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In March 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, "Revenue Recognition-Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method of Revenue Recognition," ("ASU 2010-17"), which provides guidance related to revenue recognition that applies to arrangements with milestones relating to research or development deliverables. This guidance provides criteria that must be met to recognize consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a substantive milestone in its entirety in the period in which the milestone is achieved. ASU 2010-17 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt ASU 2010-17 on August 1, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-17 is not expected to have any material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

On May 21, 2008, ZZP signed a license agreement with ZenZuu, Inc. (“ZZI”), a Nevada corporation, whereby the Company acquired the exclusive United States rights to ZZI’s online social database and advertising revenue-share model. This license agreement includes the rights to use all applicable copyrights, trademarks and related technology obtained or in connection with the online social network database and advertising revenue-sharing model. As consideration for this license, the Company is required to pay a total aggregate license fee of $1,000,000 and a monthly royalty of 25% of our net local advertising revenue received.   The term of the license is for 10 years, and is automatically renewable for successive ten year terms under the same terms and conditions.  As of OctoberJanuary 31, 20102011 and Ap rilApril 30, 2010, the Company owes $550,000 (included in accrued liabilities, related parties) and ZZI has agreed to accept future payments from the Company remitting twenty percent (20%) of month end cash available from operations.

At OctoberJanuary 31, 20102011 and April 30, 2010, the Company calculated the fair value of its assets and liabilities per ASC 820 for disclosure purposes as described below.

ASC 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for the use of fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date:

Level 2 assets and liabilities include debt instruments that are traded less frequently than exchange traded securities and derivative instruments whose model inputs are observable in the market or can be corroborated by market observable data. Examples in this category are certain variable and fixed rate non-agency mortgage-backed securities, corporate debt securities and derivative contracts.

A financial instrument's categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The following is a description of the valuation methodology used to measure fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

12

NOTE 5 - FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS(continued)

The method described above may produce a current fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. If readily determined market values became available or if actual performance were to vary appreciably from assumptions used, assumptions may need to be adjusted, which could result in material differences from the recorded carrying amounts. The Company believes its method of determining fair value is appropriate and consistent with other market participants. However, the use of different methodologies or different assumptions to value certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value.

In June 2008, the ZZP, through a Private Placement Memorandum (the “Offering”), to accredited investors on a “best efforts” began offering a basis of up to a maximum of $2,000,000 in unsecured convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”), together with two warrants for each dollar of note purchased (i) one 2-year warrant to purchase a share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share; and (ii) one 2-year warrant to purchase a share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $5.00 per share (the “Warrants”).  The conversion of the Notes and the exercisability of the Warrants are contingent upon the Company’s entry into a merger transaction with a public reporting company (the “Merger”).  The Company sold $928,000 (included in the liabilities assumed) in Notes and the Notes will mature on the two-year anniversary of the Notes and carry a per annum interest rate of 8%.