UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-Q


x

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 20182019

OR

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to           


Commission file number: 001-34055

[tlr10qaug9182.gif]Picture 1 





TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION

 (Exact(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

DELAWARE

 

82-0291227

(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

 

 

101 EAST LAKESIDE AVENUE

 

 

COEUR D’ALENE, IDAHO

 

83814

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

(208) 664-4859

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)


(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of Each Class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, $0.001 par value

TLRS

TBR

OTCQB

TSX-V

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   x   Yes  o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  xYes  o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

Large Accelerated Filer   £o

Accelerated Filer  £o

Non-Accelerated Filer    £x

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Small Reporting Company    Sx

Emerging Growth Company  £o


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  £o


Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)o  Yes  x   No


Number of shares of issuer’s common stock outstanding at August 10, 2018: 43,527,81913, 2019: 64,027,819








INDEX


INDEX



Page


Page


PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION3

ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)3

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.18

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK35

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES35

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION36

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.36

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS36

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.36

ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.36

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES36

ITEM 5.  OTHER INFORMATION36

SIGNATURES38




PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

3


ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

3


ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

14


ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

22


ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

22


PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

22


ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

22


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

22


ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

23


ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

23


ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

23


ITEM 5.  OTHER INFORMATION.

23


ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

23


SIGNATURES

24









PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)




TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


Contents


Contents



Page


Page

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:


Consolidated balance sheets

4


Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss)

5


Consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity6

Consolidated statements of cash flows7

6


Notes to consolidated financial statements

78 - 1317










TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2019

 

September 30, 2018

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 CURRENT ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

   Cash

$

114,322

$

110,736

   Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

44,098

 

44,782

     TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS

 

158,420

 

155,518

 

 

 

 

 

 PROPERTY, MINERAL RIGHTS AND EQUIPMENT, net

 

15,079,636

 

14,926,417

 

 

 

 

 

 OTHER ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

   Reclamation bonds

 

307,286

 

307,286

   Deposits and other assets

 

5,700

 

5,700

     TOTAL OTHER ASSETS

 

312,986

 

312,986

 

 

 

 

 

     TOTAL ASSETS

$

15,551,042

$

15,394,921

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

  Accounts payable

$

144,235

$

110,134

   Accrued expenses

 

100,665

 

42,166

   Accrued payroll, benefits and taxes

 

61,057

 

32,295

   Senior unsecured notes payable – net of discount

 

255,709

 

-

     TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES

 

561,666

 

184,595

 

 

 

 

 

 LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

  Asset retirement obligation

 

166,587

 

160,588

                    Payment obligation

 

178,533

 

198,806

   Senior unsecured notes payable – net of discount

 

161,874

 

196,432

     TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

 

506,994

 

555,826

 

 

 

 

 

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 7)

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:

 

 

 

 

   Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized,

     no shares issued and outstanding

 

-

 

-

   Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized,

     64,027,819 and 53,527,819 shares issued and outstanding,

     respectively

 

64,028

 

53,528

   Additional paid-in capital

 

74,302,230

 

73,197,430

   Accumulated deficit

 

(59,883,876)

 

(58,596,458)

     TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

14,482,382

 

14,654,500

 

 

 

 

 

     TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

$

15,551,042

$

15,394,921




TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30, 2018

 

September 30, 2017

 

 

(unaudited)

 

(audited)

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

  CURRENT ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

    Cash

$

303,424

$

67,154

    Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

267,080

 

20,716

    Accounts receivable

 

-

 

2,633

      TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS

 

570,504

 

90,503

 

 

 

 

 

  PROPERTY, MINERAL RIGHTS AND EQUIPMENT, net

 

13,777,895

 

17,125,519

 

 

 

 

 

  OTHER ASSETS:

 

 

 

 

    Restricted cash

 

285,128

 

285,128

    Deposits and other assets

 

5,700

 

9,750

      TOTAL OTHER ASSETS

 

290,828

 

294,878

 

 

 

 

 

      TOTAL ASSETS

$

14,639,227

$

17,510,900

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

  CURRENT LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

    Accounts payable

$

47,018

$

109,680

    Accrued expenses

 

7,939

 

9,923

    Accrued payroll, benefits and taxes

 

33,692

 

85,730

    Payment obligation

 

198,806

 

250,000

      TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES

 

287,455

 

455,333

 

 

 

 

 

  LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:

 

 

 

 

    Asset retirement obligation

 

158,653

 

152,940

      TOTAL LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

 

158,653

 

152,940

 

 

 

 

 

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 5 and 10)

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:

 

 

 

 

    Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized,

      none issued and outstanding

 

-

 

-

    Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized,

      43,527,819 and 33,146,952 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

43,528

 

33,147

    Additional paid-in capital

 

72,042,530

 

70,408,144

    Accumulated deficit

 

(57,892,939)

 

(53,538,664)

      TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

14,193,119

 

16,902,627

 

 

 

 

 

      TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

$

14,639,227

$

17,510,900



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.






TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

Three months ended

 

Nine months ended

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

2019

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Mineral exploration

$

312,960

$

22,891

$

612,987

$

70,159

 Abandonment of mineral rights

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

3,231,700

 Salaries and benefits

 

49,326

 

89,044

 

120,987

 

403,564

 Professional fees

 

56,924

 

27,662

 

219,456

 

128,233

 Insurance expense

 

21,961

 

22,760

 

70,008

 

69,996

 Other general and administrative

 

30,592

 

162,066

 

137,969

 

450,158

 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES

 

471,763

 

324,423

 

1,161,407

 

4,353,810

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

 

(471,763)

 

(324,423)

 

(1,161,407)

 

(4,353,810)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Foreign exchange gain (loss)

 

(64)

 

(884)

 

688

 

(973)

 Interest expense

 

(48,018)

 

(4,011)

 

(126,710)

 

(14,125)

 Miscellaneous other income

 

4

 

-

 

11

 

14,633

 TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

 

(48,078)

 

(4,895)

 

(126,011)

 

(465)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

(519,841)

 

(329,318)

 

(1,287,418)

 

(4,354,275)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME TAX PROVISION (BENEFIT)

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET LOSS

$

(519,841)

$

(329,318)

$

(1,287,418)

$

(4,354,275)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET LOSS PER SHARE AVAILABLE TO COMMON

  STOCKHOLDERS, BASIC AND DILUTED

$

(0.01)

$

(0.01)

$

(0.02)

$

(0.12)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON

   SHARES OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND DILUTED

 

61,511,335

 

40,478,.368

 

61,172,171

 

37,023,636



TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(UNAUDITED)

 

 

Three months ended

 

Nine months ended

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

2018

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OPERATING EXPENSES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Mineral exploration

$

22,891

$

34,964

$

70,159

$

117,084

  Abandonment of mineral rights

 

-

 

-

 

3,231,700

 

-

  Salaries and benefits

 

89,044

 

92,010

 

403,564

 

277,944

  Professional fees

 

27,662

 

52,771

 

128,233

 

191,011

  Insurance expense

 

22,760

 

24,585

 

69,996

 

68,228

  Gain on disposal of equipment

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(2,500)

  Other general and administrative

 

162,066

 

160,829

 

450,158

 

561,947

  TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES

 

324,423

 

365,159

 

 4,353,810

 

1,213,714

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

 

(324,423)

 

(365,159)

 

(4,353,810)

 

(1,213,714)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Foreign exchange gain (loss)

 

(884)

 

585

 

(973)

 

(213)

  Interest expense

 

(4,011)

 

-

 

(14,125)

 

-

  Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities

 

-

 

100,260

 

-

 

124,086

  Miscellaneous other income

 

-

 

11

 

14,633

 

16

  TOTAL OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)

 

(4,895)

 

100,856

 

(465)

 

123,889

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES

 

(329,318)

 

(264,303)

 

(4,354,275)

 

(1,089,825)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

INCOME TAX PROVISION (BENEFIT)

 

-

 

36,353

 

-

 

68,985

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET LOSS

 

(329,318)

 

(300,656)

 

(4,354,275)

 

(1,158,810)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     securities, net of tax

 

-

 

(8,276)

 

-

 

(47,275)

 Reclassification of (gain) on available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     securities sold

 

-

 

(59,239)

 

-

 

(80,840)

 TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

-

 

(67,515)

 

-

 

(128,115)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

$

(329,318)

$

(368,171)

$

(4,354,275)

$

(1,286,925)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET LOSS PER SHARE AVAILABLE TO COMMON

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   STOCKHOLDERS, BASIC AND DILUTED

$

(0.01)

$

(0.01)

$

(0.12)

$

(0.04)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    SHARES OUTSTANDING, BASIC AND DILUTED

 

40,478,368

 

31,918,655

 

37,023,636

 

27,086,018



See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.









TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

Common Stock

Shares

 

Common Stock Amount

 

Additional

Paid-in

Capital

 

Accumulated

Deficit

 

Total

Stockholders’

Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, September 30, 2018

 

53,527,819

$

53,528

$

73,197,430

$

(58,596,458)

$

14,654,500

Common stock and warrants issued for cash at $0.08 per unit

 

7,500,000

 

7,500

 

592,500

 

-

 

600,000

Stock based compensation

 

-

 

-

 

5,000

 

-

 

5,000

Warrants issued for joint venture to AGEI

 

-

 

-

 

176,000

 

-

 

176,000

Net loss

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(549,653)

 

(549,653)

Balance, December 31, 2018

 

61,027,819

 

61,028

 

73,970,930

 

(59,146,111)

 

14,885,847

Common stock and warrants issued for cash at $0.08 per unit

 

2,000,000

 

2,000

 

158,000

 

-

 

160,000

Net loss

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(217,924)

 

(217,924)

Balance, March 31, 2019

 

63,027,819

$

63,028

$

74,128,930

$

(59,364,035)

$

14,827,923

Common stock and warrants issued for cash at $0.08 per unit

 

1,000,000

 

1,000

 

79,000

 

-

 

80,000

Warrants issued with debt

 

-

 

-

 

94,300

 

-

 

94,300

Net Loss

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(519,841)

 

(519,841)

Balance, June 30, 2019

 

64,027,819

$

64,028

$

74,302,230

$

(59,883,876)

$

14,482,382

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, September 30, 2017

 

33,146,952

$

33,147

$

70,408,144

$

(53,538,664)

$

16,902,627

Common stock and warrants issued for cash at $0.30 per unit

 

2,880,867

 

2,881

 

861,379

 

-

 

864,260

Issuance costs

 

-

 

-

 

(42,493)

 

-

 

(42,493)

Stock based compensation

 

-

 

-

 

15,000

 

-

 

15,000

Net loss

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(329,162)

 

(329,162)

Balance, December 31, 2017

 

36,027,819

 

36,028

 

71,242,030

 

(53,867,826)

 

17,410,232

Stock based compensation

 

-

 

-

 

192,000

 

-

 

192,000

Net loss

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(3,695,795)

 

(3,695,795)

Balance, March 31, 2018

 

36,027,819

$

36,028

$

71,434,030

$

(57,563,621)

$

13,906,437

Common stock and warrants issued for cash at $0.08 per unit

 

7,500,000

 

7,500

 

592,500

 

-

 

600,000

Stock based compensation

 

-

 

-

 

16,000

 

-

 

16,000

Net loss

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

(329,318)

 

(329,318)

Balance, June 30, 2018

 

43,527,819

$

43,528

$

72,042,530

$

(57,892,939)

$

14,193,119

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended June 30,

 

 

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Net loss

$

(4,354,275)

$

(1,158,810)

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Deferred income tax provision

 

-

 

68,985

 

 

  Gain on disposal of equipment

 

-

 

(2,500)

 

 

  Stock-based compensation

 

223,000

 

30,000

 

 

  Abandonment of mineral properties

 

3,231,700

 

-

 

 

  Accretion of asset retirement obligation

 

5,713

 

5,441

 

 

  Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities

 

-

 

(124,086)

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Prepaid expenses and other current assets  

 

(246,364)

 

(10,386)

 

 

  Deposits and other assets

 

4,050

 

-

 

 

  Accounts receivable

 

2,633

 

(2,633)

 

 

  Accounts payable

 

(62,662)

 

(16,986)

 

 

  Accrued expenses

 

(1,984)

 

(34,000)

 

 

  Accrued payroll, benefits and taxes

 

(52,038)

 

9,634

 

 

      Net cash used by operating activities

 

(1,250,227)

 

(1,235,341)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Purchase of property, mineral rights and equipment

 

(71,500)

 

(1,099,800)

 

 

  Proceeds from sale of property, mineral rights and equipment

 

100,000

 

-

 

 

  Proceeds from lease of property, mineral rights and equipment

 

87,424

 

-

 

 

  Proceeds from disposal of equipment

 

-

 

2,500

 

 

  Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities

 

-

 

346,986

 

 

  Refund of reclamation and road use bonds

 

-

 

405,175

 

 

    Net cash provided (used) by investing activities

 

115,924

 

(345,139)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Proceeds from issuance of units, net

 

1,421,767

 

1,957,475

 

 

  Payments on payment obligation

 

(51,194)

 

-

 

 

  Proceeds from exercise of warrants

 

-

 

10,000

 

 

    Net cash provided by financing activities

 

1,370,573

 

1,967,475

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

236,270

 

386,995

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

67,154

 

82,275

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CASH AT END OF PERIOD

$

303,424

$

469,270

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NON-CASH FINANCING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Common stock issued for mineral rights

 

-

$

480,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.




TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

 

 

 

Nine months Ended June 30,

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 Net loss

$

(1,287,418)

$

(4,354,275)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 Stock-based compensation

 

5,000

 

223,000

 Abandonment of mineral properties

 

-

 

3,231,700

 Accretion of asset retirement obligation

 

5,999

 

5,713

 Amortization of debt discount

 

65,451

 

-

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 Prepaid expenses and other current assets  

 

683

 

(246,364)

 Deposits and other assets

 

-

 

4,050

 Accounts receivable

 

-

 

2,633

 Accounts payable

 

34,101

 

(62,662)

 Accrued expenses

 

58,499

 

(1,984)

 Accrued payroll, benefits and taxes

 

28,762

 

(52,038)

     Net cash used by operating activities

 

(1,088,923)

 

(1,250,227)

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 Purchase of property, mineral rights and equipment

 

(54,000)

 

(71,500)

 Proceeds from sale of property

 

-

 

100,000

 Proceeds from lease of property

 

76,782

 

87,424

   Net cash provided by investing activities

 

22,782

 

115,924

 

 

 

 

 

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 Proceeds from issuance of units, net

 

840,000

 

1,421,767

 Cash paid on payment obligation

 

(20,273)

 

(51,194)

 Proceeds from senior unsecured notes payable and warrants

 

250,000

 

-

   Net cash provided by financing activities

 

1,069,727

 

1,370,573

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

3,586

 

236,270

 

 

 

 

 

CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD

 

110,736

 

67,154

 

 

 

 

 

CASH AT END OF PERIOD

$

114,322

$

303,424

 

 

 

 

 

NON-CASH FINANCING AND INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

 

 

 

 

 Warrants issued for purchase of mineral properties

$

176,000

$

-

 Warrants issued with debt financing

 

94,300

 

-

 

 

 

 

 


See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.









TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2019 (Unaudited)


NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS:


Timberline Resources Corporation (“Timberline” or “the Company”, “we”, “us”, “our”)Company) was incorporated in August of 1968 under the laws of the State of Idaho as Silver Crystal Mines, Inc., for the purpose of exploring for precious metal deposits and advancing them to production. In 2008, wethe Company reincorporated into the State of Delaware, pursuant to a merger agreement approved by ourits shareholders.


NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:


a.

Basis of Presentation and Going Concern –- The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information, as well as the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, the financial statementsthey do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaGAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of ourthe Company’s management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial statements have been included. Operating results for the three and nine monthnine-month periods ended June 30, 20182019 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fullfiscal year ending September 30, 2018.  All amounts presented are in U.S. dollars.  2019.

For further information refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto in ourthe Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.2018.


NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

This summary of significant accounting policies is presented to assist in understanding the financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to GAAP and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

a.Going Concern – The accompanying consolidated financial statements forhave been prepared under the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2018 were prepared on the basisassumption that the Company iswill continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realizationconcern. The Company has incurred losses since its inception. The Company does not have sufficient cash to fund normal operations and meet all of its assetsobligations for the next 12 months without raising additional funds. The Company currently has no historical recurring source of revenue, and the settlement of its liabilities in the normal course of operations. These financial statements do not reflect adjustments that would be necessary if the going concern assumption were not appropriate.  The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent uponon its ability to receive cash flow fromraise capital to fund future exploration and working capital requirements, or the Company’s ability to profitably execute its business plan. The Company’s plans for the long-term return to and continuation as a going concern include financing its future operations through sales of common stock and/or debt and the eventual profitable exploitation of its mining properties. Additionally, the current capital markets and general economic conditions in the United States and Canada are significant obstacles to successfully obtain additional financing.raising the required funds. While the Company has been successful in the past in obtaining financing, there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain adequate financing in the future or that such financing will be on terms acceptable to the Company. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.


b.The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. If the going concern basis were not appropriate for these financial statements, adjustments would be necessary in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, the reported expenses and the balance sheet classifications used.

b.Net Income (Loss) per ShareNew Accounting Pronouncements -In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842). The update modifies the classification criteria and requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for most leases. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of implementing this update on the consolidated financial statements for its fiscal year beginning October 1, 2019.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation-Stock Compensation, Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU No. 2018-07 expands the scope of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by FASB that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements upon adoption.



TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2019 (Unaudited)


c.Principles of Consolidation – Basic earnings per share (“EPS”)The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Staccato Gold Resources, Ltd.; BH Minerals USA, Inc.; Wolfpack Gold (Nevada) Corp.; and Talapoosa Development Corp., after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions.

d.Reclassifications - Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior period’s data to the current presentation. These reclassifications have no effect on the results of reported operations or stockholders’ equity or cash flows.

e.Royalties – Royalty payments received on properties are offset to Property and mineral rights to the extent that basis in those properties is computedavailable to do so. When basis in not available, royalties are recognized as net income (loss) divided byon the weighted average numberConsolidated Statements of common shares outstandingOperations. Royalties received during the nine months and quarter ended June 30, 2019 were offset to property basis.

f.Exploration Expenditures – All exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred. Significant property acquisition payments for active exploration properties are capitalized. If no mineable ore body is discovered, previously capitalized costs are expensed in the period the property is abandoned. When it is determined that a mineral deposit can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs incurred after such determination will be capitalized and amortized over their useful lives. To date, the Company has not established the commercial feasibility of its exploration prospects; therefore, all exploration costs are being expensed.

g.Property Holding Costs – Holding costs to maintain a property, excluding mineral lease payments, are expensed in the period they are incurred. These costs include security and maintenance expenses, claim fees and payments, and environmental monitoring and reporting costs.

h.Fair Value of Financial Instruments – When required to measure assets or liabilities at fair value, the Company uses a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used. The Company determines the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements in their entirety fall. The categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Level 1 uses quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, Level 2 uses significant other observable inputs, and Level 3 uses significant unobservable inputs. The amount of the total gains or losses for the period. Diluted EPS reflectsperiod are included in earnings that are attributable to the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options, warrants,change in unrealized gains or losses relating to those assets and other convertible securities.liabilities still held at the reporting date.


The dilutive effect of outstanding securities, in periods of future income as of June 30, 2018 and 2017, would be as follows:


 

2018

 

2017

Stock options

3,180,000

 

2,253,334

Warrants

28,340,873

 

17,960,006

    Total possible dilution

31,520,873

 

20,213,340


At June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, the Company had no assets or liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis or nonrecurring basis.

The carrying amounts of financial instruments, including senior unsecured notes payable, approximate fair value at June 30, 2019 and 2017,September 30, 2018.

i.Cash Equivalents – For the effectpurposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Balances are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000 for accounts at each financial institution.

j.Reclamation Bonds – Bonds paid to assure reclamation of properties covered by exploration permits are capitalized in the period paid, reduced as refunds are received or expensed as they are applied to reclamation obligations.

k.Estimates and Assumptions – The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant areas requiring the use of management assumptions and estimates relate to asset impairments, asset retirement obligations, and stock-based compensation. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions and could have a material effect on the Company’s outstanding optionsreported financial position and warrants would have been anti-dilutive.results of operations. 


c.l.Property and Equipment– Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which ranges from two to seven years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Significant improvements are capitalized and depreciated over the useful life of the assets. Gains or losses on disposition or retirement of property and equipment are recognized in operating expenses.



TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2019 (Unaudited)


m.Review of Carrying Value of Property, Mineral Rights and Equipment for Impairment – The Company reviews the carrying value of property, mineral rights, and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of assets. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the property is used, the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic factors.

n.Asset retirement obligationRetirement ObligationsWe account The Company accounts for asset retirement obligations by following the uniform methodology for accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs as prescribed by authoritative accounting guidance.GAAP. This guidance provides that the fair value of aliability for an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”)will be recognized in the period in which it isincurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made.made and a contractual obligation exists. The ARO is capitalized as part of the carrying value of the assets to which it is associated, and depreciated over the useful life of the asset. Adjustments are made to the liability for changes resulting from passage of time and changes to either the timing or amount of the original present value estimate underlying the obligation. We haveThe Company has an AROasset retirement obligation associated with ourits exploration program at the Lookout Mountain exploration project.project on its Eureka property (see Note 3).





o.NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued):


d.

Available-for-sale equity securitiesProvision for Income Taxes – Available-for-sale equity securitiesIncome taxes are provided based upon the liability method of accounting. Under this approach, deferred income taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at fair value.  Unrealizedeach year-end. A valuation allowance is recorded against the deferred tax asset, if management believes it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

p.Translation of Foreign Currencies – All amounts in the financial statements are presented in US dollars, and the US dollar is the Company’s functional currency. The Company has a Canadian subsidiary, but this subsidiary has no operations, assets, or liabilities in Canada for the three- and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The US-based operations of the Company incur certain expenses in Canada, and the foreign translation and transaction gains and losses relating to equity securities classified as available-for-sale are recordedsuch expenses incurred in Canada have been included in the Company’s net loss as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(expense).

q.Stock-based Compensation – The Company estimates the fair value of its stock-based option compensation using the Black-Scholes model, which requires the input of some subjective assumptions. These assumptions include estimating the length of time employees will retain their vested stock options before exercising them (“expected life”), the estimated volatility of the Company’s common stock price over the expected term (“volatility”), employee forfeiture rate, the risk-free interest rate and the dividend yield. Changes in stockholders’ equity unless an other-than-temporary impairment inthe subjective assumptions can materially affect the estimate of fair value has occurred, in which case such accumulated loss would be charged to current period net income (loss).  Unrealized gain and losses originally included in accumulated other comprehensive income are reclassified toof stock-based compensation.

The value of common stock awards is determined based upon the current periodclosing price of the Company’s stock on the grant date of the award. Compensation expense for grants that vest is recognized ratably over the vesting period. The fair value of stock unit or stock awards is determined by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant.

r.Net Income (Loss) per Share – Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed as net income (loss) whenavailable to common shareholders divided by the sale or determinationweighted-average number of other-than-temporary-impairmentcommon shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options, warrants, and other convertible securities.

The dilutive effect of convertible and outstanding securities occurs.  Realized gainsas of June 30, 2019 and losses on2018 is as follows:

 

June 30, 2019

 

June 30, 2018

Stock options

3,280,000

 

3,180,000

Warrants

45,489,967

 

28,340,873

Total potential dilution

48,769,967

 

31,520,873

At June 30, 2019 and 2018, the saleeffect of securities are recognized on a specific identification basis.


e.

New accounting pronouncements:


Leases - In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases.” The update modifies the classification criteria and requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for most leases. The update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the adoption of this standard’s impact on its financial statements.


Statement of cash flows – Restricted cash - In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, "Statement of Cash Flows - Restricted Cash." ASU No. 2016-18 requires that restricted cash or restricted cashCompany’s common stock equivalents be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statements of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-18 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is currently assessing the adoption of this standard’s impact on its financial statements.


Compensation – Stock compensation – In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, "Compensation - Stock Compensation." ASU No. 2017-09 provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 718. ASU No. 2017-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company believes adoption of this standard will not have a material impact on its financial statements.


f.

Restricted cash – Cash that is restricted as to withdrawal or use under the terms of certain contractual arrangements, generally with regulatory agencies, is recorded inOther Assets asRestricted cash on our balance sheet.


g.

Reclassifications - Certain reclassificationswould have been made to prior periods’ balances to conform with the current period’s presentation.  These reclassifications have no effect on previously reported results from operations or net equity as previously disclosed.anti-dilutive. Accordingly, only basic EPS is presented.



TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


JUNE 30, 2019 (Unaudited)


NOTE 3 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS:PROPERTY, MINERAL RIGHTS, AND EQUIPMENT:


The table below sets forth our financial assetsfollowing is a summary of property, mineral rights, and liabilities that were accounted forequipment and accumulated depreciation at fair value on a recurring basis and the fair value calculation input hierarchy level that we have determined applies to each asset and liability category.


 

 

June 30,   2018

 

September 30, 2017

 

Input

Hierarchy

Level

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

$

303,424

 

$

67,154

 

 

Level 1

 

Restricted cash

 

285,128

 

 

285,128

 

 

Level 1

 


NOTE 4 – PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS:


Any expenses paid prior to the related services being rendered will be recorded as prepaid expenses.  At June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, prepaid expenses and other current assets included $125,000 related to a prepaid marketing consulting agreement, $95,759 related to land holding fees paid in June 2018respectively:

 

Expected Useful Lives (years)

 

June 30, 2019

 

September 30, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mineral rights – Eureka

-

$

13,656,159

$

13,678,940

Mineral rights – Elder Creek

-

 

1,322,000

 

1,146,000

Mineral rights – Other

-

 

50,000

 

50,000

Total mineral rights

 

 

15,028,159

 

14,874,940

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equipment and vehicles

2-5

 

53,678

 

53,678

Office equipment and furniture

3-7

 

70,150

 

70,150

Land

-

 

51,477

 

51,477

Total property and equipment

 

��

175,305

 

175,305

   Less accumulated depreciation

 

 

(123,828)

 

(123,828)

Property, mineral rights, and equipment, net

 

$

15,079,636

$

14,926,417

Depreciation expense for the Elder Creek property joint venture interest that the Company has agreed to acquire, with the remainder related to prepaid conference fees, prepaid insurance premiums,three- and prepaid annual exchange listing fees.nine-month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, was nil and nil, respectively.








NOTE 5 – PROPERTY AND MINERAL RIGHTS:


During the three monthsyear ended JuneSeptember 30, 2018, ourthe Company’s management and Board of Directors determined that certain payments received by the Company from a party of interest in two of the Company’s leases beginning in August 2017, which had been held and not recorded as royalty income or deposited pending an expected resolution of circumstances relating to two historic leases at ourthe Company’s Eureka property, should be deposited. The payments had been received from a third party with whom we arethe Company is in discussions to resolve matters that had been under negotiation since wethe Company acquired the Eureka property.property in 2010. The total amount of these payments received throughfor the quarter ended June 2018 was $87,424.30, 2019 were $25,664 and $76,782 for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2019. Monthly payments in the amount of $8,326approximately $8,500 are expected to continue to be received, recorded and deposited until the situation concerning the leases is resolved. These receipts are recorded as a reduction to property, mineral rights, and equipment.


ICBM SaleElder Creek property:


On May 23, 2018, we sold a participating interest in a joint venture on the ICBM Project (“ICBM”), a mineral interest located in Humboldt and Lander counties, Nevada.  The purchaser was Americas Gold Exploration, Inc. (“AGEI”) and the consideration we received for the sale was $100,000 cash, which was recorded as a decrease to mineral interests.  The total consideration also included a 0.5% net smelter return royalty on the gross production of all minerals extracted from the ICBM Project properties.  In connection with a concurrent definitive agreement with AGEI to acquire an additional joint venture interest, we decided to re-acquire this joint venture interest, now renamed as the Paiute property joint venture, as a component of the AGEI transaction.


AGEI Definitive Agreement


On May 23, 2018, weCompany executed a definitive agreement with Americas Gold Exploration, Inc. (“AGEI”)AGEI (the “Definitive Agreement”) for the purchase of interests in two joint venture ownership interests (the “JV Interests”)mineral properties in Nevada (the “Transaction”). As of June 30, 2018, we had not yet closed on the Transaction; however we expect to close on the Transaction upon completion of a financing that provides sufficient capital to meet the obligations of the two joint venture agreements for at least six months, and the receipt of final approval for the Transaction from the TSX Venture Exchange.  The JV Interestsmineral properties include the Elder Creek property joint venture withproject, currently owned by McEwen Mining Inc., which includes an option to acquire up to 65% of the project interest, and an approximate 73.7% interest in the Paiute property joint venture(formerly ICBM), with LAC Minerals (USA) LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Barrick Gold Corporation. Upon closing of the Transaction, we expect to beThe Company is the operator at both of these joint venture projects.


The consideration for the Transaction is expected to consistconsisted of ten million shares of the Company’s common stock, valued at $0.0806 per share, or $806,000, and five million non-transferrable Class D-2 share purchase warrants, (the “Consideration Warrants”), with each warrant exercisable to acquire one share of the Company’s common stock for US$0.24$0.24 for a period of three years. The warrants were fair valued at $240,000 on the transaction date. On June 18, 2018, the Company entered into an amendment to the Definitive Agreement wherein the Company agreed, upon closing of the Transaction, to reimburse AGEI for the initial payment of $100,000 due under the Elder Creek agreement with McEwen Mining. During the fourth quarter of the 2018 fiscal year, the Company paid the $100,000. Total consideration given during the year ended September 30, 2018 for the Transaction was $1,146,000 in the form of cash, common stock and warrants.

In addition, we willthe amendment to the Definitive Agreement required the Company to deliver to AGEI, subject to any required regulatory approval, an additional 5,000,000 common stock purchase warrants with the same terms and in the same form as the Consideration Warrants if and when the earlier of the following occurs: (i) Timberlinethe Company enters into an arrangement with a funding partner for the advancement of the Elder Creek Joint Venture, or (ii) Timberline hasthe Company met the 2018 work commitment of $500,000. The Company met the 2018 work commitment, and issued 5,000,000 Class G warrants, fair valued at $176,000 on the date the commitment was satisfied. (See Note 7 for valuation assumptions).



TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2019 (Unaudited)


Joint Venture on Lookout Mountain Gold Project:

On June 18, 2018, weMay 9, 2019, the Company entered into an amendmenta non-binding Letter of Intent to form a joint venture (the “Agreement”) with PM & Gold Mines, Inc. (“PM&G”) for the Definitive Agreement wherein we agreed, upon closingadvanced exploration, and if determined feasible, the development of the Transaction, to reimburse AGEI forCompany’s Lookout Mountain Gold project, located on the initial paymentsouthern end of $100,000 due under the Elder Creek JV agreement.  Upon executing the DefinitiveBattle Mountain-Eureka Trend near Eureka, Nevada. A final Agreement it was our intention to pay this initial payment, but becausereceived regulatory approval from the TSX Venture Exchange had not provided final approvalon July 27, 2019, subsequent to the close of the quarter ended June 30, 2019. PM&G is a private firm incorporated in Nevada with an interest to explore and advance gold projects to production. The parties executed a binding definitive joint venture agreement (the “Definitive Agreement”) on July 3, 2019 following completion of business and technical due diligence.

The Definitive Agreement calls for the Transaction whenCompany’s partner PM&G to fund exploration and development activities in two stages for earned equity in the initial payment was due, AGEI paidproject. Timberline will contribute the initial payment,claims that constitute the Lookout Mountain project and weadjacent historic Oswego Mine area (the “Project”) to the joint venture company in exchange for its ownership position. Timberline will reimburse AGEI formanage the $100,000 payment upon TSX-V approvaljoint venture at least through Stage I of investment. PM&G shall retain the right to manage all Stage II activities with or without Timberline’s participation.

Subsequent to June 30, 2019, and closingconcurrent with completion of the Transaction.  Agreement, PM&G also participated in investment in a private placement in Timberline at an above-market price to acquire 4.99% of Timberline’s common shares. The placement will include the right of PM&G to maintain its position in Timberline by pro-rata participation in future financings and includes a full warrant for a period of 3 years.


On June 29, 2018, we paidStage I – Earn 51%: PM&G will earn 51% of the property holding costs for the Elder Creek property which were dueProject in consideration of incurring exploration expenditures of $6 million dollars to be paiddirected towards advance of the low-grade oxide and high-grade oxide and refractory mineralization over a two-year period. The primary focus of the expenditure will seek to McEwen Mining on or before June 30, 2018.  Given thatidentify any near-term production potential (oxide/high-grade mineralization). This exploration will also test expansion of both high-grade and oxide mineralization outside the Transaction had not closed as of June 30, 2018,defined resource. The plan and effort have been developed and agreed upon through a joint Management Committee appointed by the property holding cost payment of $95,759 was recorded as other current assets at June 30, 2018.Company and PM&G.


Talapoosa Option Agreement (Terminated)Stage II – Earn 70%:


On March 12, 2015 (the “Effective Date”), we entered into PM&G will earn a property option agreement (“Agreement”) with Gunpoint Exploration Ltd. (“Gunpoint”), which closed on March 31, 2015 and was amended on October 19, 2016 (“Amended Agreement”).  Pursuant to the Agreement, Gunpoint granted us an exclusive and irrevocable option (“Option”) to purchase a 100%70% interest in Gunpoint’s Talapoosa project (the “Project”the Project when a bankable feasibility study is completed. PM&G would fund tasks at its sole expense to support the feasibility study including initiating permitting, metallurgical studies, trade-off studies, and other technical work deemed reasonable and appropriate, along with annual holding fees if Stage I has been completed. Work towards the feasibility study will be completed within 3 years of completing Stage I or as mutually agreed upon by both companies. To ensure the Project continues to advance, the Technical Committee will prepare an annual budget to implement prudent and appropriate activities.

Timberline Option to Participate 51- 49%: – When the $6 million expenditure is reached (Stage I), Timberline has the option to participate in subsequent expenditures at the 49% level. Should Timberline determine to participate, all future costs incurred to bring the Project to production will be split on a pro-rata basis.

If Timberline should choose not to participate, the Company will be further diluted and PM&G will earn 70% ownership by completing the above activities defined as Stage II.

Timberline Option to Participate 70 – 30%: At the end of Stage II, Timberline may elect to participate in subsequent expenditures at the 30% level or may elect one of the following options:

Reduce its interest to a 10% net profit interest (“NPI”) or a 2% net smelter royalty (“NSR”), or

Sell its remaining interest in western Nevada.the Project to PM&G at a price agreed between the parties following completion and evaluation of Stage I and Stage II exploration, per terms of the Mutual Right of First Refusal (“ROFR”) defined below. 



If PM&G determines not to advance beyond the 51% following completion of Stage I, it may elect one of the following options:

Participate at the 51 percent level or be diluted to a 30 percent interest by TLRS completing the Stage II activities as defined above or 

Reduce its interest to a 10% NPI or a 2% NSR payable in gold, or 

Sell its remaining interest in the Project to Timberline at a price agreed between the parties following completion and evaluation of Stage I exploration, per terms of the Mutual ROFR defined below. 




TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2019 (Unaudited)


Mutual Right of First Refusal (ROFR) – The Agreement will include a mutual ROFR wherein either JV partner may acquire the other partner’s interest at fair market value or as mutually agreed. Both partners will have a right to exercise the ROFR should either receive a 3rd party offer.

NOTE 5 – PROPERTY AND MINERAL RIGHTS (continued):


Pursuant to the Amended Agreement, during the Amended Option Period, we were required to pay $2 million and issue one million common shares of the Company by March 31, 2018.  We did not make the payment of $2 million nor issue the one million common shares of the Company by March 31, 2018, and, therefore, the Amended Agreement was terminated per its terms on March 31, 2018.  As a result, on March 31, 2018, we wrote off our entire investment of $3,231,700.  


NOTE 64 – RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS:


In connection with the definitive agreementDefinitive Agreement with AGEI for the purchase of two joint venture interests during the fiscal year ended September 30 2018, Mr. Donald J. McDowell and Mr. Dave Mathewson were appointed to ourthe Company’s Board of Directors on June 21, 2018. Mr. McDowell is the majority owner of AGEI and will beis the beneficial owner of the majority of the consideration for the Transaction. Therefore, he is the beneficial owner of the majority of the 5,000,000 Class G warrants issued to AGEI as described inNote 3 – Property, Mineral Rights and Equipment.


During the quarter ended June 30,December 31, 2018, the Company granted 200,000Board of Directors agreed to issue 100,000 stock options to acquire shares of common stock of the Company to Mr. McDowell and Mr. Mathewson, our newlyTed R. Sharp, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, appointed Directors.to the position in September of 2018. The options were granted by our Board of Directors and werefair valued at $16,000$5,000 based upon the closing price of ourthe Company’s shares of common stock on the date the options were granted.at December 31, 2018 (See Note 7 for valuation assumptions).


During the quarter ended June 30,December 31, 2018, two executive officers participated in a private placement offering of Units of the Company, purchasing in the aggregate, 250,0001,062,500 units for total proceeds of $20,000.  Subsequent to the closing of the private placement offering of Units, one participating investor has been appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors.  He purchased 625,000 Units for proceeds of $50,000.$85,000. Each Unit was priced at $0.08 and consisted of one share of common stock of the Company and one common share purchase warrant (each a “Warrant”),Class E Warrant, with each Warrantwarrant exercisable to acquire an additional share of common stock of the Company at a price of $0.14 per share until April 30, 2021.

During the quarters ended March 31, 2019 and June 30, 2019, three executive officers participated in private placement offerings of Units of the Company, purchasing 1,100,000 units for total proceeds of $88,000. Each Unit was priced at $0.08 and consisted of one share of common stock of the Company and one common share Class H Warrant, with each warrant exercisable to acquire an additional share of common stock of the Company at a price of $0.14 per share until March 22, 2022. The participation of the executive officers of the Company and a person who has subsequently been appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors,in these private placements was done at the same terms as the other investors in the private placement offering.offerings. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors approved the insiders’ participation in the private placement.        placements.


NOTE 7 – ACCRUED EXPENSES:


As of June 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, we had accrued $7,939 and $9,923 in expenses, respectively.  


The components of the accrued expenses are:   


Description

June 30,

 2018

September 30, 2017

Interest expense

$          1,332

$                -

Other expenses

6,607

9,923

Total accrued expenses

$      7,939

$        9,923


NOTE 85 – PAYMENT OBLIGATION:


On September 12, 2017, wethe Company entered into an agreement (the “Payment Agreement”) with a creditor (the “Creditor”) to pay by way of a payment plan an existing obligation of $250,000 (the “Payment Obligation”) related to a potential corporate transaction in 2015 that was not completed.


Pursuant to the Payment Agreement, wethe Company agreed to pay the Payment Obligation to the Creditor, including interest, on or before September 12, 2020. Interest accrues on the unpaid principal amount of the Payment Obligation at the Wells Fargo Bank prime rate (5.25% at June 30, 2019), as such rate may change from time to time, plus 3% per annum. WeThe Company agreed to pay the Creditor 5% of the gross proceeds of any funds raised, whether thoughthrough equity sales, Payment Obligation,borrowings or sales of assets. If the gross proceeds of any equity financing are at least $1 million, then wethe Company agreed to also commence monthly installment payments of $10,000 until the Payment Obligation is paid.


During the three monthsquarter and nine months ended June 30, 2018, we2019, the Company paid $20,000 and $63,213, respectively,$30,000 (5% of the $600,000 private placement) to the Creditor.  DuringCreditor, which included $9,727 of interest. The balance of the threePayment Obligation at June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018 was $178,533 and $198,806, respectively. At June 30, 2019, an additional $4,000 is due and payable (5% of the $80,000 private placement) to the Creditor, which will be applied to accrued interest payable when paid.

NOTE 6 – SENIOR UNSECURED NOTE PAYABLE:

On July 30, 2018, the Company entered into a binding loan agreement and promissory note with William Matlack (the “Lender”). Under the loan agreement, the Lender loaned the Company $300,000 in the form of a senior unsecured note, with the principal bearing interest at an annual rate of 18%, compounded monthly. The loan is unsecured and the principal and accrued interest will become due for repayment on January 20, 2020, but may be repaid early without penalty.



TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2019 (Unaudited)


Pursuant to the terms of the loan agreement, the Company issued to the Lender 3,265,500 non-transferrable Series F Warrants to purchase common shares of the Company. The exercise price of the warrants is $0.09, and the warrants contain a provision restricting their exercise in the event any such exercise would cause the Lender to own 10% or more of the Company’s outstanding common shares. The relative fair value of the warrants issued in connection with the senior unsecured note was estimated at $110,900, based upon a total fair value as calculated by a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The relative fair value of the warrants was recorded as a discount of the note, with $19,462 amortized to interest expense in the quarter ended June 30, 2019 and $59,277 for the nine months ended June 30, 2019. At June 30, 2019, the note payable was $255,709, net of the unamortized discount of $44,291.

On May 8, 2019, the Company entered into an additional binding loan agreement and promissory note with William Matlack. Under the loan agreement, the Lender loaned the Company $250,000 in the form of a senior unsecured note, with the principal bearing interest at an annual rate of 18%, compounded monthly. The loan is unsecured and the principal and accrued interest will become due for repayment on November 7, 2020, but may be repaid early without penalty.

Pursuant to the terms of the loan agreement, the Company issued to the Lender 3,543,600 non-transferrable Series I Warrants to purchase common shares of the Company. The exercise price of the warrants is $0.07, with a term of eighteen months, and the warrants contain a provision restricting their exercise in the event any such exercise would cause the Lender to own 10% or more of the Company’s outstanding common shares. The relative fair value of the warrants issued in connection with the senior unsecured note was estimated at $94,300, based upon a total fair value as calculated by a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The relative fair value of the warrants was recorded as a discount of the note, with $6,174 amortized to interest expense in the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2018, $13,468 and $51,194, respectively,2019. At June 30, 2019, the note payable was applied to principal$161,874, net of the Payment Obligation and $6,532 and $12,019, respectively, was applied to interest.  Interest on the Payment Obligation, in the amountunamortized discount of $1,332, was included in accrued expenses at June 30, 2018.  The obligation to commence monthly installment payments of $10,000 until the Payment Obligation is paid has not yet been triggered because we have not completed a financing with gross proceeds of at least $1 million.$88,126.






NOTE 97 – COMMON STOCK, WARRANTS AND PREFERRED STOCK:


Common Shares - Private Placement


On May 8,October 18, 2018, weand on December 3, 2018, the Company closed two tranches of a private placement offering of 7,500,000 Units of the Company at a price of $0.08 per Unit for grossnet proceeds of $600,000 (the "May 2018 Offering").$600,000. Each Unit in the May 2018 Offeringoffering consisted of one share of common stock of the Company and one common share purchase warrant (each a “Warrant”),Class E Warrant, with each Warrantwarrant exercisable to acquire an additional share of common stock of the Company at a price of $0.14 per share until the warrant expiration date of April 30,October 29, 2021.


On December 21, 2017, weMarch 29, 2019, the Company closed the sale of 2,000,000 Units, the first tranche of a private placement offering of 2,880,867up to 7,500,000 Units of the Company at a price of $0.30$0.08 per Unit, for grosstotal proceeds of $864,260 (the "December 2017 Offering").$160,000. Each Unit inof the December 2017 Offering consistedoffering consists of one share of common stock of the Company and one common share purchase Class H warrant, (each a “Warrant”), with each Warrantwarrant exercisable to acquire an additional share of common stock of the Company at a price of $0.45$0.14 per share until March 30, 2022. As a result, 2,000,000 shares of the warrant expiration dateCompany’s common stock and 2,000,000 Warrants were issued.

On June 14, 2019, the Company closed the sale of October 31, 2022.


During1,000,000 Units, the three months ended June 30, 2018, we soldsecond tranche of a private placement offering of up to 7,500,000 Units of the Company at a price of $0.08 per unitUnit, for gross and nettotal proceeds of $600,000 as no finder’s fees$80,000. Each Unit of the offering consists of one share of common stock of the Company and one common share purchase Class H warrant, with each warrant exercisable to acquire an additional share of common stock of the Company at a price of $0.14 per share until March 30, 2022. As a result, 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and 1,000,000 Warrants were paid.issued.


Warrants

During the nine monthsnine-month period ended June 30, 2018, we closed the sale of two private placement offerings.  In the aggregate, we sold a total of 10,380,867 Units at prices of $0.30 per unit (as to 2,880,867 units) and $0.08 per unit (as to 7,500,000 units) for gross proceeds of $1,464,260 and net proceeds, net of offering costs, of $1,421,767.     


Warrants


During the nine months ended June 30, 2018, 10,380,8672019, 18,843,600 warrants were issued, 7,500,000, 2,000,000 and 800,000 pursuant to two separatethe private placement offerings.  Noofferings, 3,543,600 issued pursuant to the Senior unsecured note payable, and another 5,000,000 warrants expired duringissued to AGEI under the three or nine months ended Juneterms of the Elder Creek purchase of mineral rights (See Note 3).

The fair value of the 5,000,000 warrants issued in connection with the purchase of mineral rights was estimated at $176,000 on the date of issuance. The fair value of the 3,543,600 warrants issued with a Senior unsecured note payable was $151,400 (with a relative fair value of $94,300) on the date of issuance. The fair value of warrants was determined with a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The assumptions used to calculate fair values are noted in the following table:



TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2018.  At June 30, 2018, there were 9,960,006 warrants outstanding with an exercise2019 (Unaudited)


Warrants Issued During the Nine Months Ended

June 30, 2019

Expected volatility

137.4% - 138.5%

Stock price of $0.25 per share that expire on date of grant

$0.06 - $0.07

Exercise price

$0.07 - $0.24

Expected dividends

-

Expected term (in years)

1.5 - 3

Risk-free rate

2.26% –2.46%

Expected forfeiture rate

0%

On May 31, 2019; 8,000,0002019, 9,960,006 3-year Class A warrants outstanding with an exercise price of $0.40 per share that expire on January 31, 2020; 2,880,867expired. There were 45,489,967 and 36,606,373 warrants outstanding with an exercise price of $0.45 that expire on October 31, 2022; and 7,500,000 warrants outstanding with an exercise price of $0.14 that expire on April 30, 2021.  In aggregate, as of June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, there were 28,340,873respectively. The warrants outstanding at aexpire from January 31, 2020 through March 22, 2022. The weighted average exercise price was $0.21 and $0.26 as of $0.284.June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018, respectively.


Preferred Stock


We areThe Company is authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.01 par value. OurThe Company’s board of directors is authorized to issue the preferred stock from time to time in series, and is further authorized to establish such series, to fix and determine the variations in the relative rights and preferences as between series, to fix voting rights, if any, for each series, and to allow for the conversion of preferred stock into common stock. There is no preferred stock issued as of June 30, 2018.2019.


NOTE 108 – STOCK-BASED AWARDS:


During the three monthsquarter ended June 30,December 31, 2018, 200,000 stockthe Company’s shareholders approved and the Company’s Board of Directors adopted of the Company’s 2018 Stock and Incentive Plan. This plan replaced the Company’s 2015 Equity Incentive Plan. The aggregate number of shares that may be issued to employees, directors, and consultants under all stock-based awards made under the 2018 Stock and Incentive Plan is 8 million shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon exercise of options or other awards, shares are issued from the available authorized shares of the Company. Option awards are granted with an exercise price of $0.10 and a five-year term where grantedequal to new directors.  All of the awarded stock options vested immediately.  The fair value of allthe Company’s stock at the date of the options that were granted and vested during the three months ended June 30, 2018 was $16,000 ($0.08 per option).  grant.


During the three monthsquarter ended June 30, 2017, noDecember 31, 2018, the Board of Directors agreed to issue 100,000 stock options were granted; however 62,500 options that were granted on March 15, 2017 vested perto the quarterly vesting schedule.Chief Financial Officer. The fair value of the options that vested during the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $15,000.


During the nine months ended June 30, 2018, 1,800,000 stock options with an average weighted exercise price of $0.16 and a five-year term where granted to employees and directors.  All of the awarded stock options vested immediately.  The fair value of all of the options that vested during the nine months ended June 30, 2018 was $223,000, including the fair value ($15,000) of 62,500 options that were granted on March 15, 2017 and vested on December 15, 2017.  


During the nine months ended June 30, 2017, 250,000 stock options with an exercise price of $0.33 and a three-year term where granted to a consultant.  The awarded stock options vested quarterly with 25% of the options vesting each quarter beginning on March 15, 2017.  The fair value of the options that vested during the nine months ended June 30, 2017 was $30,000.





NOTE 10 – STOCK-BASED AWARDS (continued):


The cost of options granted to employees is recorded as salaries and benefits, and the cost of options granted to directors and consultants is recorded as other general and administrative expenses.  The total compensation cost of options vested under the plan, charged against operations, is included in the consolidated statements of operations as follows:


 

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

Nine months ended June 30,

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

2018

 

2017

Salaries and benefits

$

-

$

-

$

120,000

$

-

Other general and administrative expenses

 

16,000

 

15,000

 

103,000

 

30,000

Total

$

16,000

$

15,000

$

223,000

$

30,000


The value of the optionsoption awards granted during the three months and nine monthsquarter ended June 30,December 31, 2018 was estimated$5,000 and measured on the date of grantthe issuance with a Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the assumptions noted in the following table:


 

Options Granted on

 

Options Granted on

 

 

June 21, 2018

 

February 2, 2018

 

Expected volatility

134.5%

 

121.6%

 

Stock price on date of grant

$0.10

 

$0.17

 

Expected dividends

-

 

-

 

Expected term (in years)

3

 

3

 

Risk-free rate

2.65%

 

2.33%

 

Expected forfeiture rate

0%

 

0%

 

Option Obligation Matured During Quarter Ended December 31, 2018

Expected volatility

137.4%

Stock price on date of grant

$  0.06

Exercise price

$  0.10

Expected dividends

-

Expected term (in years)

5

Risk-free rate

2.46%

Expected forfeiture rate

0%


During the nine-month period ended June 30, 2019, 100,000 options were terminated as a result of the resignation of a member of the Board of Directors.



TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2019 (Unaudited)


The following is a summary of our options issued under the Amended 2005 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2015 Stock and Incentive Plan:outstanding at June 30, 2018:


Options

 

 Weighted  Average

 Exercise Price

 

 

 

 

 

2018 Options

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

Outstanding at September 30, 2017

Outstanding at September 30, 2017

 

2,233,334

 

$

0.41

Outstanding at September 30, 2017

 

2,233,334

 

$

0.41

Granted

 

1,800,000

 

 

0.16

Issued

 

1,900,000

 

 

0.16

Expired

 

(853,334)

 

 

(0.43)

Expired

 

(853,334)

 

 

(0.43)

Outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2018

Outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2018

 

3,180,000

 

$

0.26

Outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2018

 

3,280,000

 

$

0.26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the three months ended June 30, 2018

 

$

0.08

 

 

 

Average remaining contractual term of options outstanding and exercisable

at June 30, 2018 (years)

Average remaining contractual term of options outstanding and exercisable

at June 30, 2018 (years)

3.74

Average remaining contractual term of options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2018 (years)

 

 

 

 

3.74


The aggregate of options exercisable as of June 30, 2018 had an intrinsic value of $4,000,nil, based on the closing price of $0.12$0.17 per share of ourthe Company’s common stock on June 30, 2018.




The following is a summary of options issued and outstanding at June 30, 2019:



 

2019 Options

 

Weighted Average Exercise Price

 

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at September 30, 2018

 

3,280,000

 

$

0.26

 

Issued

 

100,000

 

 

0.10

 

Terminated

 

(100,000)

 

 

(0.10)

Outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2019

 

3,280,000

 

$

0.26

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average remaining contractual term of options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2019 (years)

 

 

 

 

3.26

The aggregate of options exercisable as of June 30, 2019 had an intrinsic value of nil, based on the closing price of $0.08 per share of the Company’s common stock on June 28, 2019.

NOTE 119 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:


Mineral Exploration


In addition to the commitment we have relating to our purchase of joint venture interests from AGEI (see Note 5) we have the following commitments and contingencies:


A portion of ourthe Company’s mining claims on ourthe Company’s properties are subject to lease and option agreements with various terms, obligations, and royalties payable in certain circumstances.


Pursuant to the Amended Option Agreement at Talapoosa (see Note 5), we had an obligation to make a payment of $2 million by March 31, 2018, which payment was not made and, therefore, the Amended Option Agreement was terminated per its terms on March 31, 2018.  We have no future obligations related to the Amended Option Agreement at Talapoosa.  


We payThe Company pays federal and county claim maintenance fees on unpatented claims that are included in ourthe Company’s mineral exploration properties. Should wethe Company continue to explore all of ourthe Company’s mineral properties, we expectit expects annual fees to total approximately $158,000$255,500 per year in the future.future, of which $105,778 is for the two joint venture mineral property interests (See Note 3).



TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

While we recognize that we will not be able to meet these payments with our current cash balances, we do expect to make these payments with proceeds from expected capital raises.  We expect to obtain additional capital through refunds of excess restricted cash held for exploration bonds and financing transactions such as equity investments, asset sales, joint ventures, debt facilities, or other types of strategic arrangements.JUNE 30, 2019 (Unaudited)



Real Estate Lease Commitments


As of June 30, 2018,2019, the Company has no real estate lease commitments.commitments for certain mineral properties totaling $82,000. The Company’s office in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho and its facilities in Eureka, Nevada are rented on a month-to-month basis.


Total office Lease expense for mineral exploration and real estate lease and rental expense from continuing operations is included in the following line items in the consolidated statementsConsolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss):Operations:


 

 

Three months ended

June 30,

Nine months ended

June 30,

 

 

2019

 

2018

 

2019

 

2018

Mineral property purchases

$

18,000

$

18,000

$

36,000

$

36,000

Mineral exploration expenses

 

3,900

 

6,900

 

7,800

 

32,700

Other general and administrative expenses

 

10,500

 

10,500

 

21,000

 

31,500

Total

$

32,400

$

35,400

$

64,800

$

100,200


 

 

Three months ended June 30,

Nine months ended

June 30,

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

2018

 

2017

Mineral exploration expenses

$

6,900

$

12,900

$

32,700

$

38,700

Other general and administrative expenses

 

10,500

 

10,500

 

31,500

 

31,500

Total

$

17,400

$

23,400

$

64,200

$

70,200


Employment Agreements


The Company has employment agreements with two executive employees that require certain termination benefits and payments in defined circumstances.


NOTE 1210 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:


On July 30, 2018, we11, 2019, the Company entered into a binding commitment letter (the “Loan Agreement”)the Definitive Agreement to form the joint venture with PM & Gold Mines, Inc. (“PM&G” and promissory note (the “Note”)together with William Matlack (“Lender”).  Under the Loan Agreement, the Lender purchased from Timberline, the principal amount of US$300,000“JV Partners”) whereby the JV Partners formed a limited liability company to conduct operations on the Company’s Lookout Mountain Project in Nevada (the “Principal Sum”“Project”) of senior unsecured notespursuant to a limited liability company agreement (the “Notes”“Agreement”), with the Principal Sum bearing interest at an annual rate of 18%, compounded monthly. The loan is unsecured and the Principal Amount and accrued interest will become due for repayment on January 20, 2020, but may be repaid early without penalty. The Lender is an arm’s length party to the Company.  Amounts drawn under the Loan Agreement will be used for exploration expenditures, annual property holding costs, and working capital requirements of the Company.


. Pursuant to the termsAgreement, PM&G can earn an initial 51% interest in the project, which is located on the southern end of the LoanBattle Mountain-Eureka Trend, by expending $6 million on exploration and development over a 2-year period. 

In connection with the Agreement the Company issued to the Lender 3,265,500 non-transferrable common share purchase warrants of the Company (the “Warrants”), which is equal to 100% warrant coverage of the Principal Sum, determinedas approved by dividing the Principal Sum by the Company’s last closing share price on the TSX Venture Exchange, (CND$0.12)further to Timberline’s February 8, 2019 news release announcing a $500,000 non-brokered private placement of Timberline units at a price of $0.08 per unit (the “Offering”), convertedPM&G has subscribed for a 4.99% ownership position in the Company under the Offering. Pursuant to U.S. dollars, prior toadditional Offering subscriptions received, the effective dateCompany closed the Offering on a fully subscribed basis following TSX Venture Exchange approval of the LoanOffering and Agreement. The exercise priceTotal shares issued under the Agreement was 3,367,441, with a like number of the Warrants is US$0.09, and the Warrants contain a provision restricting their exercise in the event any such exercise would cause the Lender to own 10% or morewarrants, for cash proceeds of our outstanding common shares.$269,395.









ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

 

As used in herein, the terms “Timberline,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Timberline Resources Corporation.

The followingThis discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve known or unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Except for historical information, the matters set forth herein, which are forward-looking statements, involve certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ. Potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, unexpected changes in business and economic conditions; significant increases or decreases in gold prices; changes in interest and currency exchange rates; unanticipated grade changes; metallurgy, processing, access, availability of materials, equipment, supplies and water; results of current and future exploration and production activities; local and community impacts and issues; timing of receipt and maintenance of government approvals; accidents and labor disputes; environmental costs and risks; competitive factors, including competition for property acquisitions; and availability of external financing at reasonable rates or at all, and those set forth under the heading “Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on December 27, 2018. Forward- looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continues” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements.Forward-looking statements are made based on management’s beliefs, estimates, and opinions on the date the statements are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update such forward-looking statements if these beliefs, estimates, and opinions should change, except as required by law.

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with ourthe accompanying unaudited condensed interim consolidated financial statements as at and forrelated notes. The discussion and analysis of the threefinancial condition and nine months ended June 30, 2018 andresults of operations are based upon the related notes thereto,unaudited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). This discussion and analysis contains forward-lookingof America. The preparation of financial statements and forward-looking information that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements and information as a result of many factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth elsewhereconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. See section heading “Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” below.


Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements


This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the exhibits attached hereto contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the United States Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,America requires the Company to make estimates and “forward-looking information” withinassumptions that affect the meaningreported amounts of applicable Canadian securities legislation, collectively “forward-looking statements.”  Such forward-looking statements concern our anticipated resultsassets and developments in our operations in future periods, planned explorationliabilities, disclosure of any contingent liabilities at the financial statement date and developmentreported amounts of our properties, plans related to our businessrevenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis the Company reviews its estimates and assumptions. The estimates were based on historical experience and other mattersassumptions that may occur in the future.  These statements relateCompany believes to analyses and other information thatbe reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management.  These statements include, but are not limited to, comments regarding:


·the establishment and estimates of mineralization and reserves;

·the grade of mineralization and reserves;

·anticipated expenditures and costs in our operations;

·planned exploration activities and the anticipated timing and outcomes of such exploration activities;

·planned production of technical reports, economic assessments, and feasibility studies on our properties;

·plans and anticipated timing for obtaining permits and licenses for our properties;

·expected future financing, strategic and other transactions and the anticipated outcomes;

·plans and anticipated timing regarding production dates;

·anticipated gold and silver prices;

·anticipated liquidity to meet expected operating costs and capital requirements;

·our ability to obtain financing to fund our estimated expenditure and capital requirements; and

·factors expected to impact our results of operations


Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “estimates” or “intends”, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual events or resultslikely to differ from those expressedestimates under different assumptions or implied byconditions, but the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:


·risks related toCompany does not believe such differences will materially affect our limited operating history;

·risks related to our ability to continue as a going concern;

·risks related to our historyconsolidated financial position or results of losses and our expectation of continued losses;

·risks related to our properties being inoperations. Critical accounting policies, the exploration or, if warranted, development stage;

·risks related to our bringing our projects into production;

·risks related to our mineral operations being subject to government and environmental regulations;

·risks related to future legislation and administrative changes to mining laws;

·risks related to future legislation regarding climate change

·risks related to our ability to obtain additional capital for exploration or to develop our reserves, if any;

·risks related to land reclamation requirements and costs;

·risks related to mineral exploration and development activities being inherently hazardous;

·risks related to our insurance coverage for operating risks;

·risks related to cost increases for our exploration and development projects;

·risks related to a shortage of skilled personnel, equipment, & supplies adversely affecting our ability to operate;

·risks related to mineral resource and economic estimates;

·risks relatedpolicies the Company believes are most important to the fluctuationpresentation of prices for preciousits consolidated financial statements and base metals, such as gold, silverrequire the most difficult, subjective and copper;complex judgments are outlined below in “Critical Accounting Policies” and have not changed significantly.





·risks related to the competitive industry of mineral exploration;Corporate Overview

·risks related to our title and rights in our mineral properties;

·risks related to integration issues with acquisitions;

·risks related to our common stock trading on the Over-the-Counter markets

·risks related to joint ventures and partnerships;

·risks related to potential conflicts of interest with our management;

·risks related to our dependence on key management;

·risks related to our Lookout Mountain, Windfall, Seven Troughs, and other acquired growth projects;

·risks related to our potential acquisition of joint venture interests in the Paiute and Elder Creek projects;

·risks related to our business model;

·risks related to evolving corporate governance standards for public companies;

·risks related to our Canadian regulatory requirements; and

·risks related to our shares of common stock or other securities.


This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect our forward-looking statements. Some of the important risks and uncertainties that could affect forward-looking statements are described further under the sections titled “Risk Factors”, “Description of Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2017, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on December 20, 2017.  Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated or expected.  We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.  We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, except as otherwise required by law.


We qualify all the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q by the foregoing cautionary statements.


Corporate Overview


Our business is mineral exploration in Nevada with a focus on district-scale gold, and copper-gold projects such as our Eureka project in Nevada.and Elder Creek projects, respectively.


Eureka Project

In June 2010, we acquired Staccato Gold Resources Ltd. (“Staccato”), a Canadian-based resource company listed on the TSX Venture Exchange that was in the business of acquiring, exploring and developing mineral properties with a focus on gold exploration in the dominant gold producing trends in Nevada. As a result of this acquisition, we obtained Staccato’s Eureka Property, which included their flagship gold exploration project, the Lookout Mountain Project (“Lookout Mountain”) and the Windfall project, along with several other projects at various stages of exploration in the Battle Mountain/Eureka gold trend in Nevada, along with Staccato’s wholly owned U.S. subsidiary, BH Minerals USA, Inc.

Elder Creek Project

On August 14, 2018, we finalized the acquisition of the Elder Creek property as part of a two-property acquisition from Americas Gold Exploration Inc. to purchase the latter’s rights, title and interest in, to, and under the Elder Creek Joint Venture (JV Agreement) with a subsidiary of McEwen Mining (McEwen). The Elder Creek property is located in northern




Nevada, 8 miles west-northwest of Battle Mountain in Lander and Humboldt Counties immediately west of Battle Mountain (Figure 1). The project lies within the Battle Mountain mining district, covers approximately 9,600 acres (15 miles square) and includes 583 unpatented lode mining claims.

The major styles of mineralization recognized in the Elder Creek area are calc-alkaline, porphyry copper style mineralization and associated peripheral gold-silver-bearing base-metal vein systems. The hydrothermal alteration zoning pattern indicates the presence of a large magmatic-hydrothermal center(s) to the Elder Creek porphyry system. The stockwork quartz veined core of the system is northeasterly-elongate and exceeds 1 by 2 miles (~1.5 by 3 km), which compares favorably to other global porphyry copper systems and regional systems such as Robinson, Yerington, Butte, and Bingham.

Figure 1. Elder Creek Project Location

Picture 7 

The underlying Elder Creek JV with McEwen grants Timberline, as operator of the project, terms of earn-in to acquire a 51% ownership for $2.6 M expenditure over 4 years by December 31, 2021, and a 65% ownership for an additional $2.5M expenditure for a total commitment of $5.1M over 6 years by December 31, 2023. The agreement includes industry standard dilution to a 2% NSR following earn-in. Upon completion of the 65% earn-in expenditures, if McEwen elects to participate, the parties will form a joint venture (the “Joint Venture”), and each party would contribute to further exploration spending according to their ownership interest. There are no underlying royalties on the property.

On November 28, 2018 the Company announced completion of a NI43-101 Technical Report on the Elder Creek Copper-Gold Project. The report provides a comprehensive description of the project.

The Elder Creek property has no known reserves, as defined under Guide 7, and the proposed program for the property is exploratory in nature.




Other Projects / Properties

In August 2014, we acquired Wolfpack Gold (Nevada) Corp. (“Wolfpack”), a U.S. company that was in the business of acquiring, exploring, and developing mineral properties with a focus on gold exploration in the dominant gold producing trends in Nevada. As a result of this acquisition, we obtained cash and several projects at various stages of exploration in the gold trends of Nevada.


InWe commenced our exploration stage in January 2004 with the change in the management of the Company. From January 2004 until March 2006, we were a mineral exploration company.

During 2014, we advanced our business plan with the acquisition of Wolfpack Gold (Nevada) Corp., and we have continued to focus our business model on mineral exploration and development, with future revenues and cash flows, if any, to be derived from any future mineral production.

On March 12, 2015, we acquired anentered into a property option fromagreement with Gunpoint Exploration Ltd. (“Gunpoint”), which closed on March 31, 2015. Gunpoint granted us an exclusive and irrevocable option (“Option”) to purchase a 100% interest in Gunpoint’s Talapoosa exploration project in western Nevada. The optionPursuant to the agreement, as amended (the “Amended Agreement”), granted uswe had the right to exercise the purchase optionOption at any time beginning on March 31, 2015 and ending within thirty (30) months of March 12, 2015, unless sooner terminated. On October 19, 2016, we amended the terms of the Option agreement (the “Amended Agreement”) with Gunpoint. The Amended Agreement still granted us an exclusive and irrevocable option (“Option”) to purchase a 100% interest in the Property in western Nevada. Pursuant to the Amended Agreement, we had the right to exercise the Option through March 31, 2019 (“Amended Option Period”), subject to certain interim payments and cumulative project expenditures.  We did not make

On March 31, 2017, we paid the requiredTalapoosa option payment of $2$1 million, nor issue the oneand on April 13, 2017, we issued 1 million common shares, both of the Company by March 31, 2018 as required by the Amended Agreement, and, therefore, the Amended Agreement was terminated per its terms on March 31, 2018.


In May 2018, we entered intowhich were interim payments due to a definitivesubsidiary of Gunpoint pursuant to our option agreement to acquire ownership interests in two joint venture agreements in Nevada from Americas Gold Exploration, Inc (“AGEI”).  The acquisition includes a 73.7% interest in the Paiute property joint venture with LAC Minerals (USA) LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Barrick Gold Corporation, and the opportunity to earn up to 65% ownership in the Elder Creek joint venture with McEwen Mining, Inc.  This transaction has not closed as of the date of this filing.


Recent Events


As of the date of this filing, we anticipate that we will close soon on the acquisition of two joint venture ownership interests, at Elder Creek with McEwen Mining and at Paiute with Barrick Gold, from AGEI for consideration of ten





million shares of our common stock and five million warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.  An additional five million warrants with the same terms is expected to be issued to AGEI, subject to certain achievements.  Upon closing, we anticipate being the operator at both of these joint venture projects.


In May 2018, we closed a private placement offering of 7,500,000 Units of the Company at a price of $0.08 per Unit for gross proceeds of $600,000 (the “May 2018 Offering”).   Each Unit in the May 2018 Offering consisted of one share of common stock of the Company and one common share purchase warrant, with each warrant exercisable to acquire an additional share of common stock of the Company at a price of $0.14 per share until the warrant expiration date of April 30, 2021.


In December 2017, we closed a private placement offering of 2,880,867 Units of the Company at a price of $0.30 per Unit for gross proceeds of $864,260 (the “December 2017 Offering”).   Each Unit in the December 2017 Offering consisted of one share of common stock of the Company and one common share purchase warrant, with each warrant exercisable to acquire an additional share of common stock of the Company at a price of $0.45 per share until the warrant expiration date of October 31, 2022.


On September 12, 2017, we entered into an agreement (the “Payment Agreement”) with a creditor (the “Creditor”) to pay by way of a payment plan an existing obligation of $250,000 (the “Debt”) related to a potential corporate transaction in 2015 that was not completed.  Pursuant to the Payment Agreement, we agreed to pay the Debt to the Creditor, including interest, on or before September 12, 2020.  Interest accrues on the unpaid principal amount of the Debt at the prime rate, as such rate may change from time to time, plus 3% per annum.  We agreed to pay the Creditor 5% of the gross proceeds of any funds raised, whether though equity sales, debt, or sales of assets.  If the gross proceeds of any equity financing are at least $1 million, then we agreed to also commence monthly installment payments of $10,000 until the Debt is paid.  


During the three months and six months ended March 31, 2018, we paid $8,850 and $43,213, respectively, to the Creditor, which represented 5% of the gross proceeds of two tranches of a private placement completed in December 2017.  During the three months and six months ended March 31, 2018, $7,684 and $37,727, respectively, was applied to principal of the Debt and $1,166 and $5,486, respectively, was applied to interest.  The payment made during the three months ended March 31, 2018 was paid in early January 2018 even though the final private placement proceeds were received in late December 2017.  The obligation to commence monthly installment payments of $10,000 until the Debt is paid has not yet been triggered because we have not completed a financing with gross proceeds of at least $1 million.


Mineral Exploration


Talapoosa, Nevada


In March 2015, we acquired an option from Gunpoint Exploration Ltd. (“Gunpoint”) to purchase a 100% interest in Gunpoint’sthe Talapoosa exploration project in western Nevada.  Talapoosa is a 14,870-acre district-scale property comprising U.S. Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) claims, fee lands, and water rights.  The option agreement, as amended (the “Amended Agreement”), granted us the right to exercise the purchase option at any time through March 31, 2019, subject to certain interim payments and cumulative project expenditures. We did not make the required payment of $2 million nor issue the one million common shares of the Company by March 31, 2018, as required by the Amended Agreement, and, therefore, the Amended Agreement was terminated per its terms on March 31, 2018. We have no future plans or obligations related to the Talapoosa project.


Eureka Project, NevadaMineral Exploration


The Eureka Project, which includes Lookout Mountain, Windfall and Oswego projects, comprises an area of approximately 15,000 acres, or more than 23 square miles.  The Eureka ProjectOur exploration focus to date during fiscal 2019 is located within the southern portion of Nevada’s Battle Mountain-Eureka gold trend and includes three structurally controlled zones of gold mineralization, each approximately 3- 4 miles in strike length, all zones of which are open and will require additional in-fill and step-out drilling. The project has an extensive exploration, drilling, and gold production history by a number of companies since 1975, including Idaho Mining Corp., Norse-Windfall Mining, Amselco, Echo Bay Mines, Newmont and Barrick Gold. A total of 533 holes, totaling 267,000 feet, were drilled on the property prior to its acquisition by Timberline in 2010. Gold mineralization tested to date is typical sediment-hosted “Carlin-type” gold mineralization, most of which may be amenable to low-cost, heap-leach processing.Elder Creek project.


Lookout Mountain


In 2010-2011, we completed an exploration program that culminated in the release of an NI 43-101 compliant technical report, entitled,Technical Report on the Lookout Mountain Project, Eureka County, Nevada, USA, dated May 2, 2011 (the “Lookout Mountain Technical Report”).  The Lookout Mountain Technical Report was prepared by Mine Development





Associates (“MDA”) of Reno, Nevada under the supervision of Michael M. Gustin, Senior Geologist, who is a qualified person under NI 43-101.  The Lookout Mountain Technical Report details mineralization at Lookout Mountain.


Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors: The Lookout Mountain Technical Report uses the terms “mineral resource,” “measured mineral resource,” “indicated mineral resource” and “inferred mineral resource”. We advise investors that these terms are defined in and required to be disclosed by Canadian regulations (NI 43-101); however, these terms are not defined terms under Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. As a reporting issuer in Canada, we are required to prepare reports on our mineral properties in accordance with NI 43-101. We reference the Lookout Mountain Technical Report in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for informational purposes only, and the Lookout Mountain Technical Report is not incorporated herein by reference. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of a mineral deposit in the above categories will ever be converted into Guide 7 compliant reserves. “Inferred mineral resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable.

Elder Creek Project:

Timberline’s Elder Creek and adjacent Paiute copper-gold properties lie within the prolific Battle Mountain District of Nevada, approximately 11 miles (18 km) north of Newmont’s Phoenix mining complex (Figure 1). Data compiled from over 40-plus years of exploration on the property documents only shallow, historic drilling within a pronounced magnetic low considered to be the core of a large porphyry copper-gold hydrothermal system. Furthermore, only shallow drilling occurred along the north and northeastern magnetic zone and primarily targeted gold. Geologic and geophysical characteristics and rock geochemical sampling results evident at Elder Creek (see press release dated June 18, 2018 at http://timberlineresources.co/press-releases/) are common to major porphyry copper deposits.

The Elder Creek Project, which covers a claim group of approximately 39 square kilometers (km), demonstrates geologic, geochemical, and geophysical characteristics common to major porphyry copper-gold deposits. The core of the Elder




Creek porphyry target covers approximately 4.5 square km, and has multiple intrusive phases which form two granodiorite porphyry centers within altered Harmony Formation arkosic sandstone and shale. The intrusive rocks are similar in age to those at Newmont’s Phoenix gold-copper mine located 18 km (11 miles) to the south. The porphyry core of the system is characterized by intense quartz veining and elevated copper and molybdenum values in rock and soil samples, and is flanked by proximal potassic alteration and distal biotite-pyrite-pyrrhotite hornfels. It forms a pronounced magnetic low that is ringed by a strongly magnetic “donut” high of hornfels. Large areas of gold-copper veining occur within the hornfels to the south and east of the porphyry core, and copper oxide is exposed in outcrop immediately peripheral to the core.

Figure 2. Elder Creek Project Area Geology, Alteration Zoning, and IP Anomaly

Picture 9 




Since acquiring the project, we have completed four drill holes within the multi-stage hydrothermal system. The first hole, RCEC18-01, was drilled by reverse circulation (RC) at the Valmy pit copper oxide occurrence (Figure 2). It intersected hornfels after Harmony Formation shales and arkosic quartzite, and porphyritic intrusive rock, and contains 0.21% copper over its entire 500 foot (152 m) length, including 0.44% copper over 110 feet (34 m), and 0.55% copper, 0.331 g/t gold and 13 g/t silver over 15 feet (4.6m), and bottomed in strong mineralization (Table 1).

Table 1. Summary of Elder Creek 2018 7 2019 Drilling Results

Drill Hole

From

(feet)

To

(feet)

Total (feet)

From (meters)

To (meters)

Total (meters)

Cu (%)

Mo (ppm)

Au (g/t)

Ag (g/t)

2019, Phase II Drilling

RCEC 19-01

270

1960

1690

82.3

597.6

515.3

0.07

212

 

2

 including:

475

680

205

144.8

207.3

62.5

0.12

222

 

4

 

1115

1180

65

339.9

359.8

19.9

0.25

181

 

5

 

1615

1630

15

492.4

497.0

7.6

0.21

233

 

5

2018, Phase I Drilling

RCEC 18-01

0

500

500

0

152.4

152.4

0.21

145

3

 including:

160

270

110

48.8

82.3

33.5

0.44

181

5

 

195

210

15

59.5

64.0

4.6

0.55

132

0.33

13

CCEC 18-02

840

1497

657

256.1

456.4

200.3

0.15

730

4

  including:

1313.5

1360

46.5

400.5

414.6

14.2

1.20

3100

0.13

26

*True thickness of drill intercepts is unknown; see press release dated November 26, 2018 at  http://timberlineresources.co/press-releases/ for sample methodology, chain of custody, and quality control and assurance

Drilling at a second site located 3,250 feet (1 km) to the south (Figure 2) within the non-magnetic portion of the system was initiated as an RC hole and subsequently deepened by core drilling. Available assays from core hole CCEC18-02 show an intersection of 46.5 feet (14.2 meters) grading 1.20% copper, 0.31% molybdenum, 25.5 g/t silver, and 0.126 g/t gold (Table 1) within a broader zone of anomalous copper-molybdenum mineralization(see press release dated November 26, 2018 at http://timberlineresources.co/press-releases/).




In follow-up to successful drilling at the initial two sites at Elder Creek, we contracted Zonge Geophysics of Reno, Nevada to complete an Induced Polarization/Resistivity (“IP”) survey (Figure 2). The survey was designed to characterize the rocks for signatures associated with concentration of sulfides (IP), associated silicification (Resistivity) as hydrothermal alteration, and identification of major fault zones within the project area.

As reported in Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 8, 2019, during the quarter ended December 31, 2108, we completed the IP geophysical survey (Figure 2) at the Elder Creek Project in Nevada’s Battle Mountain mining district. A strong IP anomaly was identified, the edge of which appears to have been intersected in drill hole CCEC18-02 at a depth (Figure 3) where coincident with the best mineralization in the core hole. The RC hole was terminated above the IP anomaly due to drilling difficulties.

IP/Resistivity Survey

Zonge Geophysics of Reno, Nevada completed the IP survey using the dipole-dipole method which is effective in mapping subsurface concentrations of metallic sulfide minerals. The method was selected with generally 400-meter line spacing and 200-meter dipole separation to give a subsurface survey depth limit of approximately 500 meters. The first survey line was completed over core hole CCEC18-02 to calibrate the geophysical response to sulfide mineralization intersected in the drill hole. Parallel survey lines were positioned to overlap the zoned porphyry-style stockwork quartz veins and hydrothermal biotite mineral alteration which help define the large size of the system.

The IP data were processed by Zonge with a 2-dimensional Smooth-Model Inversion and presented in sequential depth sections (Figure 3) along the survey lines (Figure 2). The priority anomaly, as defined by high chargeability, extends from near surface to at least 500 m depth in places over a trend length of 1,600 m. The anomalies are generally open beyond the depth extent allowed by data processing.

Figure 3. Elder Creek IP Chargeability along Vertical Sections

Picture 2 




Our drilling (hole CCEC18-02) along Line 3,600 N (Figure 4) appears to have clipped the western edge of the priority IP anomaly where pervasively altered hornfels (after Harmony Formation greywacke and arkosic sandstones), porphyritic intrusive rocks, and hydrothermal breccias were intersected. Sulfides occur throughout the hole, but are most concentrated from 400.5 – 414.6 meters (1,313.5 - 1,360 feet) where they occur primarily as irregular veinlets, and as quartz-sulphide matrix to breccia which cross-cuts potassic-altered hornfels and associated porphyritic intrusions. The mineralization is polymetallic with sulfides of iron, copper and molybdenum.

The abundance of iron and sulfur in the drill hole CCEC18-02 intercept correlates well with the strongest chargeability (Figure 4) giving confidence that the IP method is successfully mapping a large sulfide body. Historic drill holes (see Elder Creek NI43-101 Technical Report at http://timberlineresources.co/ ) along Line 3600N stopped short of testing the IP anomaly, but nonetheless intercepted anomalous copper and iron sulfides above the IP anomaly.

Figure 4.Line 3600N IP Chargeability Anomaly and Drill Hole CCEC18-02 and Historic Drill Holes

Picture 1 

Near the north end of the survey area, our drilling in hole RCEC18-01 between IP Line 4400N and Line 4800N (Figure 2) was terminated at 152 m (500 feet) due to difficult drilling conditions and did not effectively penetrate the IP anomaly. Nonetheless, drilling intersected 34 m (110 feet) of 0.44% copper in near-surface, altered hornfels within a broader interval (152 m; 500 feet) of 0.21% copper (see press release dated September 27, 2018 at http://timberlineresources.co/press-releases/), much of which is oxidized. The IP anomaly in this area is considered to remain untested by drilling.

In summary, key conclusions of the IP survey include:

The IP maps a distinct body of sulfide mineralization ≥1,600 m long and 500 - 800 m wide (Figures 1 and 2) within a very large (4 km) circular copper-molybdenum-gold-silver porphyry mineral system;

The IP suggests that, although well mineralized, Timberline’s drill holes did not test the strongest part of the large mineral system. Furthermore, historic drilling was too shallow (typically <200m depth) to intersect the anomaly. As such, the IP anomaly remains largely untested by drilling.

Our exploration during the quarter also included reprocessing of historic magnetic and gravity data for the Elder Creek project area. This work was completed by Zonge Geophysics with results documenting the occurrence of distinct magnetic and density (gravity) anomalies which in part appear to be spatially related to the IP anomaly.




A fourth drill hole, reverse circulation (RC) hole RCEC19-01 was drilled to a depth of 1,960 feet (600 meters) to target the core of the IP/resistivity (IP) geophysical anomaly identified in December, 2018 (Figure 2)(see press release dated July 9, 2019 at http://timberlineresources.co/press-releases/).

RCEC19-01 intercepted approximately 590 feet (180 m) of intensely stockwork quartz-veined, altered (quartz-biotite ± sericite) Harmony Formation quartzite and hornfels and an underlying thick section of 1,361 ft (415 m) of intensely-altered, quartz-feldspar, variably porphyritic intrusive rock (Figure 5). Alteration of the intrusion is dominated by quartz-sericite with variable chlorite and biotite. Porphyry style mineralization is visible throughout and is especially notable within the intrusive phase as pyrite-chalcopyrite ± molybdenite, with anomalous copper, molybdenum, and silver (Table 1). 

Phase I drilling of two holes (Figure 1) in 2018 intercepted material amounts of copper-molybdenum-gold-silver mineralization over long intervals (Table 1). These holes were later determined to be located within (Hole RCEC18-01) and on the periphery of (CCEC18-02) the IP anomaly (Figure 2) identified by the geophysical survey later that year.

Figure 5.Cross Section Line 3600N showing Hole RCEC19-01 drill test of IP Chargeability Anomaly

Picture 6 

Relative to Hole CCEC18-02, RCEC19-01 intercepted a much thicker section of porphyry-style altered intrusive rock (Figure 5), with notably increased quartz-sericite alteration and overall increased sulfide mineral content primarily as pyrite (iron sulfide). The distribution of increased sulfide content in RCEC19-01 relative to CCEC18-02 correlates well with the center of the IP anomaly, and the intrusive rock correlates well with magnetic and gravity signatures as previously reported (see Figures 5 and 6 of press release dated March 27, 2019 at http://timberlineresources.co/press-releases/). The intrusive rock is interpreted to represent an apophysis which extends upward from a large intrusion at depth. The distribution of sulfide minerals in the drill holes may reflect zoning within and along the margins of the intrusive apophysis as is common in mineralized porphyry systems. 

Exploration Plans

Future drilling will include proposed drill holes testing the margins of the intrusive phases. The project is fully pending available financing, geophysics and drilling will resume in the fourth calendar quarter of 2019.

In addition to Elder Creek, exploration is planned at the Paiute Project pending available financing. Drilling at Elder Creek and Paiute are fully permitted with the US Bureau of Land Management for an additional 43 sites, and 3 sites, respectively.

Drilling is also planned at Eureka as part of a fully-funded Joint Venture Agreement on Lookout Mountain project.

Our exploration plans and budgets are dependent upon the availability of capital. As financial markets improve and we are able to attract additional investment dollars, we will expand our exploration plans accordingly.




Joint Venture on Lookout Mountain Gold Project

On May 9, 2019, we entered into a non-binding Letter of Intent to form a joint venture (the “Agreement”) with PM & Gold Mines, Inc. (“PM&G”) for the advanced exploration, and if determined feasible, the development of our Lookout Mountain Gold project, located on the southern end of the Battle Mountain-Eureka Trend near Eureka, Nevada. A final Agreement received regulatory approval on July 27, 2019. PM&G is a private firm incorporated in Nevada with an interest to explore and advance gold projects to production. The parties executed a binding definitive joint venture agreement (the “Definitive Agreement”) on July 3, 2019 following completion of business and technical due diligence.

The Agreement calls for the Company’s partner PM&G to fund exploration and development activities in two stages for earned equity in the project. Timberline will contribute the claims that constitute the Lookout Mountain project and adjacent historic Oswego Mine area (the “Project”) to the joint venture company in exchange for its ownership position. Timberline will manage the joint venture at least through Stage I of investment. PM&G shall retain the right to manage all Stage II activities with or without Timberline’s participation.

Concurrent with completion of the Agreement PM&G also participated in investment in a private placement in Timberline at an above-market price to acquire 4.99% of Timberline’s common shares. Total shares issued under the Agreement was 3,367,441, with a like number of warrants, for cash proceeds of $269,395.The placement includes the right of PM&G to maintain its position in Timberline by pro-rata participation in future financings and includes a full warrant for a period of 3 years.

Stage I – Earn 51%: PM&G will earn 51% of the Project in consideration of incurring exploration expenditures of $6 million dollars to be directed towards advance of the low-grade oxide and high-grade oxide and refractory mineralization over a two-year period. The primary focus of the expenditure will seek to identify any near-term production potential (oxide/high-grade mineralization). This exploration will also test expansion of both high-grade and oxide mineralization outside the defined resource. The plan and effort have been developed and agreed upon through a joint Management Committee appointed by the Company and PM&G.

Stage II – Earn 70%: PM&G will earn a 70% interest in the Project when a bankable feasibility study is completed. PM&G would fund tasks at its sole expense to support the feasibility study including initiating permitting, metallurgical studies, trade-off studies, and other technical work deemed reasonable and appropriate, along with annual holding fees if Stage I has been completed. Work towards the feasibility study will be completed within 3 years of completing Stage I or as mutually agreed upon by both companies. To ensure the Project continues to advance, the Technical Committee will prepare an annual budget to implement prudent and appropriate activities.

Timberline Option to Participate 51- 49%: – When the $6 million expenditure is reached (Stage I), Timberline has the option to participate in subsequent expenditures at the 49% level. Should Timberline determine to participate, all future costs incurred to bring the Project to production will be split on a pro-rata basis.

If Timberline should choose not to participate, the Company will be further diluted and PM&G will earn 70% ownership by completing the above activities defined as Stage II.

Timberline Option to Participate 70 – 30%: At the end of Stage II Timberline may elect to participate in subsequent expenditures at the 30% level or may elect one of the following options:

Reduce its interest to a 10% net profit interest (“NPI”) or a 2% net smelter royalty (“NSR”), or

Sell its remaining interest in the Project to PM&G at a price agreed between the parties following completion and evaluation of Stage I and Stage II exploration, per terms of the Mutual Right of First Refusal (“ROFR”) defined below.

If PM&G determines not to advance beyond the 51% following completion of Stage I, it may elect one of the following options:

Participate at the 51 percent level or be diluted to a 30 percent interest by TLRS completing the Stage II activities as defined above or 

Reduce its interest to a 10% NPI or a 2% NSR payable in gold, or 

Sell its remaining interest in the Project to Timberline at a price agreed between the parties following completion and evaluation of Stage I exploration, per terms of the Mutual ROFR defined below. 




Mutual Right of First Refusal (ROFR) – The Agreement will include a mutual ROFR wherein either JV partner may acquire the other partner’s interest at fair market value or as mutually agreed. Both partners will have a right to exercise the ROFR should either receive a 3rd party offer.

The Lookout Mountain project lies within Timberline’s 23 square-mile Eureka property which is strategically located within the greater Eureka Mining District (see a detailed description and maps at http://timberlineresources.co/projects/). Lookout Mountain is a large “Carlin-style” gold-system with a defined gold resource (see Updated Technical Report describes gold mineralization which was modeled and estimated by MDA.  MDA statistically evaluated available drill data utilizing geologic interpretations provided by Timberline to interpret gold mineral domains on cross sections spaced at 50- to 100-foot intervals across the extent of the Lookout Mountain mineralization.  The cross sections were rectified with mineral-domain interpretationsProject, MDA, Effective March 1, 2013, filed on level plans spaced at 10-foot intervals.  The modeledSEDAR April 12, 2013) and drill-indicated mineralization was analyzed using geostatistics to aid in the establishmentwhich extends over a north-south trend of estimation parameters, and interpolating grades into a three-dimensional block model.


In 2012, we released updated exploration data for Lookout Mountain and filed an updated Lookout Mountain Technical Report.   As a result of the most recently completed exploration program, we have successfully extended the mineralized zone at Lookout Mountain 600 feet to the south of the mineralized zone boundary defined in the 2011 Lookout Mountain Technical Report, and have expanded mineralization along the west margin of the deposit. Results from Lookout Mountain, and from the South Adit area, significantly increased the currently reported mineralization at Lookout Mountain.  In early 2013, we completed our 2012 exploration program at Lookout Mountain, including 26,140 feet total of infill-drilling.  This program focused on expansion of mineralization, metallurgical, geotechnical, and permitting studies.


Assay results from drilling were incorporated into an updated Lookout Mountain Technical Report which was completed in early 2013.  Drilling also provided data for on-going metallurgical studies directed at characterization ofapproximately 3 miles (~ 5 km). High-grade gold mineralization recovery,near the historical open pit occurs on a northwest-southeast trend within the resource area and for initial assessment of pit-slope stabilities.  Permitting-related activities were advanced through completion of quarterly monitoring, and installation of three monitoring wells. Conceptual designs for site facilities (heap leach pads, mine rock storage, access roads) have also been prepared.  


In 2013, we continued geochemical waste rock environmental characterization, completed independent metallurgical leach testing, continued water quality monitoring and defined hydrologic work plans.  We also continued the baseline environmental data collection and analysis at Lookout Mountain.  In addition, we reduced costs by consolidating our Elko field office into our Eureka facility.  


During most of 2014, the Company limited exploration related activities to low cost field surveys including soil and rock sampling, drill site reclamation, site archeological surveys, and geologic mapping.  The mapping led to identification of new targets on each of the three structural zones of gold mineralization.  In December 2014, drilling resumed at Eureka with an initial test of one new target completed before year-end.  RC drill hole BHSE-171 identified a new zone of gold mineralization and intersected 25 feet of 0.144includes 17 intercepts ranging from 0.136 ounces of gold per ton (“opt”) (7.62 meters (m) of 4.93 grams ofto 2.250 opt gold per tonne (“g/t”)) within a longer 65-foot interval assaying 0.094 opt (19.82 m of 3.22 g/t) in the Lookout Mountain area.  This hole was offset 140 feet from BHSE-152 (drilled in 2012) which first encountered the new zone in 2012 but was not completed due to drilling difficulties.  


In follow-up to the successful results in RC drill hole BHSE-171, two diamond drill core holes were completed in January, 2015.  BHSE-172 intersected 25.2 feet of 0.15 opt (7.7 m of 5.02 g/t) within an interval of 46.6 feet of 0.10 opt (14.2 m of 5.02 g/t).  BHSE-173 intercepted 57.4 feet of 0.06 opt (17.5 m @ 1.92 g/t)(Table 1) (see press release dated July 10, 2018 at http://timberlineresources.co/press-releases). The two core hole intercepts of the mineralized zone were offset approximately 140 feet from BHSE-171.  The intercepts are well-correlated, as the gold occurs in mineralized collapse breccia within the pyritic Dunderberg Shale-Hamburg Dolomite contact zone.  The intercepts are thought by Timberline geologists to be related to stratigraphic traps associated spatially with a higher-grade feeder system as recognized in many Carlin-type systems.  Two additional RC holes were completed as infill drilling within the existing resource area at Lookout Mountain.  Results were highlighted by hole BHSE-174, which intercepted 75.0 feet of 0.02 opt (22.9 m of 0.57 g/t) which is very consistent with surrounding intercepts.  






Recently, we completed a detailed geologic review and reinterpretation of the Lookout Mountain gold mineralization. Work focused on internal geologic modeling of 17 intercepts of high-grade (>0.136 opt & up to 2.250 opt) gold mineralization that is associated with extensive zones of structurally controlled fault- and gouge-breccias,fault breccias, as well as variably carbonaceous collapse-breccia. The gold mineralization is associatedcollapse-breccias, and with orpiment and realgar (arsenic sulfides), (Figure 1) which are commonly found in many major Carlin-typeCarlin-style gold deposits.


WindfallCompletion of the Definitive Agreement will be subject to certain conditions, including receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals.


InTimberline has previously reported a gold resource estimate at Lookout Mountain, which was prepared by Mine Development Associates (“MDA”) of Reno, Nevada. The MDA resource estimates are summarized below at the past,noted cut-off grades:

Lookout Mountain Gold Resource (2)(3) 

Resource Category(1)

Short Tons

Metric Tonnes

Ounces of Gold per Ton (opt)

Grams of Gold per Tonne (g/t)

Gold Ounces

Measured

3,043,000

2,761,000

0.035

1.20

106,000

Indicated

25,897,000

23,493,000

0.016

0.55

402,000

Measured & Indicated

28,940,000

26,254,000

0.018

0.62

508,000

Inferred

11,709,000

10,622,000

0.012

0.41

141,000

Notes:

(1)0.006 opt (0.21 g/t) cut-off applied to oxidized material to capture mineralization potentially available to open pit extraction and heap leach processing. 0.030 opt (1.03 g/t) cut-off applied to unoxidized material to capture mineralization potentially available to open pit extraction and lower heap leach recoveries or sulfide processing.

(2)Rounding may cause apparent discrepancies.

(3)The effective date of the Lookout Mountain updated gold resources is February 20, 2013.

The full MDA Resource Estimate with various cut-off grades can be seen at http://timberlineresources.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/LookoutMt_-43-101_2013.pdf.

On July 11, 2019, we also completedentered into the Definitive Agreement to form the joint venture with PM & Gold Mines, Inc. (“PM&G” and together with Timberline, the “JV Partners”) whereby the JV Partners formed a six-hole RC drill programlimited liability company to conduct operations on the Windfall target withinCompany’s Lookout Mountain Project in Nevada (the “Project”) pursuant to a limited liability company agreement (the “Agreement”) . Pursuant to the Eureka project.  The drilling successfully tested on-strike, offset,Agreement, PM&G can earn an initial 51% interest in the project, which is located on the southern end of the Battle Mountain-Eureka Trend, by expending $6 million on exploration and down-dip extensions of gold mineralization that was previously mined at Windfall.  Six drill holes completeddevelopment over a strike length2-year period, as further described below. 




In connection with the Agreement as approved by the TSX Venture Exchange, further to Timberline’s February 8, 2019 news release announcing a $500,000 non-brokered private placement of approximately 3,000 feet intersected gold mineralization consistent with results from over 600 historic drill holes, highlighted by BHWF-40 which intersected 80 feetTimberline units at 0.09 opta price of gold (24.9 m @ 3.04 g/t) which included$0.08 per unit (the “Offering”), PM&G has subscribed for a subsection of 20 feet @ 0.26 opt of gold (6.1 m @ 8.79 g/t).    The data for Windfall is expected4.99% ownership position in the Company under the Offering. Pursuant to support potential development of an estimateadditional Offering subscriptions received, the Company closed the Offering on a fully subscribed basis following TSX Venture Exchange approval of the Offering and Agreement.

Lookout Mountain Gold Mineralization

Table 1.  Representative High-Grade Gold Drill Intercepts from the Lookout Mountain Deposit

Drill Hole

From (feet)

Length (feet)(1)

Gold (opt)(2)

From (meters)

Length (meters)(1)

Gold (g/t) (2)

BH05-01

270

65

0.344

82.3

19.8

11.79

including

275

25

0.641

83.8

7.6

21.98

BH05-03

193

3

2.250

58.8

0.9

77.14

BH06-02

445

27

0.364

135.7

8.2

12.48

BH06-07

406

92

0.217

123.8

28.0

7.44

BH06-13

148

3

1.47

45.1

0.9

50.40

BR-19

220

15

0.323

67.1

4.6

11.07

BR-19

385

75

0.283

117.4

22.9

9.70

BR-26

440

20

0.323

134.1

6.1

11.07

RTR-134

415

55

0.345

126.5

16.8

11.83

RTR-180

365

10

0.345

111.3

3.0

11.83

RTR-181

365

15

0.197

111.3

4.6

6.75

RTR-258

500

10

0.430

152.4

3.0

14.74

BHSE-126C

31

15

0.967

9.5

4.6

33.15

BHSE-151C

506

8.6

1.023

154.3

2.6

35.07

BHSE-152

1,030

10

0.165

314.0

3.0

5.66




BSE-171

1,020

10

0.230

311.0

3.0

7.89

BHSE-172

900

40

0.136

82.3

19.8

11.79

(1)    Drill thickness – True widths of drill intercepts have not been determined
(2)    opt: oz gold / ton; g/t: grams/tonne
(3)    See press releases dated July 10, 2018 at http://timberlineresources.co/press-releases) and Updated Technical Report on the Lookout Mountain Project, MDA, Effective March 1, 2013, Filed on SEDAR April 12, 2013

Timberline’s current gold resource estimate (Table 2) at Lookout Mountain, which was prepared by Mine Development Associates (“MDA”) of Reno, Nevada, includes:

Table 2. Lookout Mountain Gold Resource(1)(2)(3)

Resource Category

Tons

Tonnes

Gold (opt)

Gold

(g/t)

Gold Ounces

Measured

3,043,000

2,761,000

0.035

1.20

106,000

Indicated

25,897,000

23,493,000

0.016

0.55

402,000

Measured & Indicated

28,940,000

26,254,000

0.018

0.62

508,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inferred

11,709,000

10,622,000

0.012

0.41

141,000

Notes:

1)006 opt (0.21 g/t) cut-off applied to oxidized material to capture mineralization at the project.potentially available to open pit extraction and heap leach processing. 0.030 opt (1.03 g/t) cut-off applied to unoxidized material to capture mineralization potentially available to open pit extraction and lower heap leach recoveries or sulfide processing. 


2)Rounding may cause apparent discrepancies.

Recently, at the Windfall project area, on-going fieldwork, combined with compilation of drilling data and geologic modeling, has traced a continuous zone of gold mineralization along a length of approximately 1.7 miles (2.7 km). This includes mineralization that is exposed in and between the historic Rustler, Windfall, and South Paroni pits, which were mined in the 1970’s and 1980’s. These pits produced over 100,000 oz of gold from oxidized, near-surface ore and were among the first heap-leach mining operations in Nevada.  Gold mineralization at Windfall occurs primarily in the upper-most Hamburg Dolomite beneath the Dunderberg Shale (Figure 3). Historic drilling was commonly shallow, averaging 250 feet in depth, and much of the upper Hamburg–lower Dunderberg mineralized zone remains un-tested, including the extent of mineralization exposed in the high-walls and bottom of the mining pits.  Our Windfall database includes approximately 1,300 historic drill holes with gold assay data. Within the mineralized zone at Windfall, over a distance of approximately 1 mile (1.6 km), there have been an additional 11 holes drilled since 2008. These eleven holes intersected gold consistent with that in many of the adjacent historic holes.


Oswego


Recent results of surface rock chip sampling and geologic mapping have defined new, high-grade, gold exploration targets along the Oswego trend at Eureka. The Oswego trend, which extends 3.1 miles north-south, includes high-grade gold at the Road-Cut target, high-grade silver and gold at the Geddes- Bertrand target, and numerous additional untested targets.

The Company recently generated and announced assay results for 54 rock samples at Oswego. Most notably, 9 grab samples collected at approximately 20 feet spacing over a 180-foot section of road cut along a moderately east-dipping, strongly mineralized fault zone (the Road-Cut target) averaged 0.4 ounces per ton (opt) gold.


The Oswego trend is the central of three parallel, north-south, gold-mineralized structural trendsRefer to Updated Technical Report on the Eureka property. With the recent workLookout Mountain Project, MDA, effective March 1, 2013, Filed on SEDAR April 12, 2013.

The full MDA resource estimate with various cut-off grades can be seen at Oswego, exploration targets for future drilling are now defined at Oswegohttp://timberlineresources.co/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/LookoutMt_-43-101_2013.pdf.




Figure 1. High-Grade Gold Mineralized Drill Core from Lookout Mountain showing Collapse Breccia including Arsenic-sulfides (Realgar (red) and on all three of the trends at Eureka.  Throughout the Oswego trend, the occurrence of wide-spread gold and silver mineralization in outcrop, indicate the existence of a robust gold system. Several rock formations on the trend are well-known as favorable hosts for large Carlin-type deposits in the region.Orpiment (yellow)). 


Subject to available capital, we plan to resume work at Eureka with a focus on the Windfall Project where we anticipate completion of geologic modelling and engagement of an independent qualified expert to complete a resource calculation of gold ounces and grade.  We also plan to continue exploration at Oswego where we have identified geologic indicators of potential gold mineralization.Picture 7 


There are no proven and probable reserves as defined under Guide 7 at the Eureka Project, and our activities there remain exploratory in nature.


Summary


We believe the global economic environment and monetary climate continue to favor a relatively steady gold price for the foreseeable future with potential for long-term price improvements.  While volatility is to be expected, our expectation is that we can identify and pursue opportunities to advance our projects, despite the current gold price and market volatility.  


As a company, we are considering financing and strategic corporate opportunities with our focus on providing for the advancement of projects comprising our Eureka property and other property interests we may acquire.  While our focus has previously been on Talapoosa, with the relinquishment of the Talapoosa option, we plan to advance multiple project areas and targets on our Eureka property.








We believe that with appropriate funding, the Windfall project at our Eureka property can advance with determination of an initial gold mineralization estimate and follow-up drilling targeted to expand the mineralization.  Further potential will be developed with the advancement of new targets at Oswego and the potential acquisition of other prospective property interests in Nevada.  We believe that our management and our board of directors have the knowledge and experience to evaluate financing and strategic opportunities and to provide for the advancement of multiple projects.       


Results of Operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 20182019 and 20172018


Consolidated Results

 

(US$)

Three Months Ended

June 30,

Nine months Ended

June 30,

 

2019

2018

2019

2018

Exploration expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Eureka

$   306,483

$   4,718

$   581,680

$   26,564

 

Talapoosa

-

2,062

-

27,416

 

Other exploration properties

6,477

16,111

31,307

16,179

Total exploration expenditures

312,960

22,891

612,987

70,159

Non-cash expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Stock option expenses

-

16,000

5,000

223,000

 

Abandonment of mineral rights

-

-

-

3,231,700

 

Depreciation, amortization and accretion

2,032

1,935

5,999

5,713

 

Accretion of discount on senior note payable

25,636

-

65,451

 

Total non-cash expenses

27,668

17,935

76,450

3,460,413

Professional fees expenses

56,924

27,662

219,456

128,233

Insurance expenses

21,961

22,760

70,008

69,996

Salaries and benefits expenses

49,326

89,044

120,987

283,564

Interest and other (income) expense

48,078

4,895

126,011

465

Other general and administrative expenses

2,924

144,131

61,519

341,445

Net loss

$  519,841

$  329,318

$  1,287,418

$  4,354,275




(US$)

Three Months Ended

 June 30,

Nine Months Ended

June 30,

 

2018

2017

 

2018

 

2017

Exploration expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eureka

$

4,718

$

5,401

$

26,564

$

25,379

 

Talapoosa

2,062

29,405

 

27,416

 

87,510

 

Other exploration properties

16,111

158

 

16,179

 

4,195

Total exploration expenditures

22,891

34,964

 

70,159

 

117,084

Non-cash expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock option expenses

16,000

15,000

 

223,000

 

30,000

 

Abandonment of mineral rights

-

-

 

3,231,700

 

-

 

Income tax provision

-

36,353

 

-

 

68,985

 

Gain on disposal of equipment

-

-

 

-

 

-

 

Gain on sale of available-for-sale securities

-

(100,260)

 

-

 

(124,086)

 

Depreciation, amortization and accretion

1,935

1,843

 

5,713

 

5,441

Total non-cash expenses

17,935

(47,064)

 

3,460,413

 

(19,660)

Professional fees expenses

27,662

52,771

 

128,233

 

191,011

Insurance expenses

22,760

24,585

 

69,996

 

68,228

Salaries and benefits expenses

89,044

92,010

 

283,564

 

277,944

Interest and other (income) expense

4,895

(596)

 

465

 

197

Other general and administrative expenses

144,131

143,986

 

341,445

 

524,006

Net loss

$

(329,318)

$

(300,656)

$

(4,354,275)

$

(1,158,810)



Our consolidated net loss for the three months ended June 30, 20182019 was $329,318$519,841, compared to a consolidated net loss of $300,656$329,318 for the three months ended June 30, 2017.2018. The year-over-year differenceincrease in net loss is primarily relateddue to no salesincreased exploration expenses, accretion of available-for-sale securities in the 2018 period.  In addition, in 2018, the exploration,discount on senior note payable, and increased professional fees and interest expense, insurance costs,offset by decreased non-cash stock option expense, salaries and benefits expenses, and other general and administrative expenses. Professional fees were higher and salaries and benefits expenses were all lower than the comparable period in 2017.  Other general and administrative expenditures and stock option expenses were substantially similar in the two periods.  We anticipate that the net loss will increase as a result of our exploration activity increases, subject to changes in non-cash option expenses and general and administrative expenditures which vary according to transaction activity.  Exploration expenditures during the three months ended June 30, 2018 decreased compared to the same period in 2017 due to the relinquishment of the Talapoosa property to the underlying owner at the end of March 2018.  We anticipate that exploration expenditures will increase year-over-year in the next quarter, subject to available capital, as we seek to advance projects on our Eureka property and on joint ventured properties where we are the operator, once they are acquired.  


Our consolidated net loss for the nine months ended June 30, 2018 was $4,354,275, including a charge of $3,231,700 related to the relinquishment of the Talapoosa option.  Excluding the abandonment of mineral rights expense, the net loss for the nine months ended June 30, 2018 was $1,122,575 comparedChief Financial Officer functions being outsourced to a consolidated net loss of $1,158,810 for the nine months ended June 30, 2017.  


The year-over-year difference, excluding the abandonment of mineral rights expense related to the relinquishment of the Talapoosa option, is primarily related to greater professional fees, other general and administrative expenses, and expenses related to exploration at Talapoosafirm with an internal reduction in 2017, offset by increased non-cash stock option expense due to options granted in 2018.employee headcount. Other general and administrative expenditures were higherlower in 20172019 primarily related to marketing andthe non-recurrence of consulting costsfees aimed at increasing our market exposure and supporting our marketing efforts during the nine monthsquarter ended June 30, 2017.  We anticipate that2019. These same factors, and the abandonment of the Talapoosa property in 2018, drove a decrease in net loss excluding abandonment of mineral rights expenses, will increase, subject to available capital, as we increase our exploration activity, subject to changes in non-cash option expenses and general and administrative expenditures which are subject to transaction activity.for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2019. Exploration expenditures during the nine months ended June 30, 2018 decreased2019 increased compared to the same period in 20172018 due to the relinquishment of the Talapoosasignificant exploration activity performed on Elder Creek, a new property to the underlying owner at the endus acquired in later quarters of March 2018.  We anticipate that exploration expenditures will increase in future





periods, subject to available capital, as we seek to advance projects on our Eureka property and on joint ventured properties where we are the operator, once they are acquired.  


Subject to adequate funding for the remainder of 2018,in 2019, we expect to continue to incur exploration expenses for advancing exploration initiatives at the Lookout Mountain and Windfall projects on our Eureka property and at theadvancement of Elder Creek and Paiute joint venture properties.exploration at Eureka.


Financial Condition and Liquidity


At June 30, 2018,2019, we had assets of $14,639,227,$15,551,042, consisting of cash in the amount of $303,424;$114,322; property, mineral rights and equipment of $15,079,636, net of depreciation, of $13,777,895, restricted cash held for explorationreclamation bonds of $285,128,$307,286, and prepaid expenses, deposits and other assets in the amount of $272,780.  $49,798.


On June 30, 2019, we had total liabilities of $1,068,660 and total assets of $15,551,042. This compares to total liabilities of $740,421 and total assets of $15,394,921 on September 30, 2018. As of June 30, 2019, our liabilities consist of $166,587 for asset retirement obligations, $417,583 of senior unsecured note payable, net of discount, $178,533 of payment obligation, and $305,957 of trade payables and accrued liabilities. Of these liabilities, $561,666 are due within twelve months. The increase in liabilities compared to September 31, 2018 is largely due to the increase in senior unsecured notes payable and accounts payable and accrued liabilities, offset by a reduction in the payment obligation. The increase in total assets was due to additions to the Elder Creek property as a result of the fair value of warrants issued for the 2018 work requirement being met during the nine-month period ended June 30, 2019. Increases in cash and prepaid expenses also contributed to the increase in assets for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2019.

On June 30, 2019 we had negative working capital of $403,246 and stockholders’ equity of $14,482,382 compared to negative working capital of $29,077 and stockholders’ equity of $14,654,500 for the year ended September 30, 2018. Working capital experienced an unfavorable change because of a senior unsecured note payable becoming due within the coming 12 months and increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses, offset partially by an increase in cash associated with private placements of our equity and an increase in prepaid expenses.

During the three monthsquarter ended June 30, 2019, we used cash from operating activities of $1,088,923 compared to $1,250,227 used for the quarter ended June 30, 2018. Net loss of $1,287,418 for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2019 compared to net loss of $4,354,275 for the quarter ended June 30, 2018. The causal factors are disclosed in the comparative table above.

During the nine-month period ended June 30, 2019, cash of $22,782 was provided by investment activities, compared with cash provided of $115,924 for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2018. We paid $54,000 to purchase mineral properties, while receiving $76,782 for lease payments to us for company-owned mineral properties. During the nine-month period ended June 30, 2018, we paid $71,500 for mineral properties while receiving $100,000 for proceeds from the sale of property and $87,424 for lease payments to us for company-owned mineral properties.

During the nine-month period ended June 30, 2019, cash of $1,069,727 was provided by financing activities, compared to cash of $1,370,573 provided during the nine-month period ended June 30, 2018. For the nine-month period ended June 30, 2019, cash of $840,000 was provided through the sale of stock and warrants, net of offering costs, cash of $250,000 was provided from proceeds of long-term debt and warrants, and cash of $20,273 was used for payment of the payment obligation. This compares to cash of $1,421,767 provided through the sale of stock and warrants, net of offering costs, and $51,194 used for payment of the payment obligation for the nine-month period ended June 30, 2018.

During the nine-month period ended June 30, 2019, we closed the sale of antwo equity financing in which wefinancings. We sold a total of 7,500,00010,500,000 Units at a price of $0.08 per unit for gross and net proceeds of $600,000.  


During the nine months ended June 30, 2018, we closed the sale of two equity financings.  In the aggregate, we sold a total of 10,380,867 Units at an average price of $0.14 per unit for gross proceeds of $1,464,260 and net proceeds after the costs of the financing of $1,421,767.  


$840,000.

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis that the Company is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of our assets and the settlement of our liabilities in the normal course of our operations.




Disruptions in the credit and financial markets over the past several years have had a material adverse impact on a number of financial institutions and investors and have limited access to capital and credit for many companies. In recent years,addition, commodity prices and mining equities have seen significant volatility which increases the risk to precious metal investors. Commodity price expectations, global economic uncertainties,Market disruptions and market factors,alternative investment options, among other things, make it more difficult for us to obtain, or increase our cost of obtaining, capital and financing for our operations. Our access to additional capital may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all. If we are unable to obtain financing through equity investments, we will seek multiple solutions including, but not limited to, return of excess restricted cash held for exploration bonds, asset sales, corporate transactions, credit facilities or debenture issuances in order to continue as a going concern.


At June 30, 2018,2019, we had negative working capital of $283,049.  As of the date of this report, we have approximately $260,000outstanding in current liabilities and a cash balance of approximately $500,000.$403,246. As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we have approximately $561,666 outstanding in current liabilities and a cash balance of $114,322. Subsequent to the end of the quarter, we entered into a Joint Venture on the Lookout Mountain project, which will provide exploration funds, including land payment relief, and provided us cash for general corporate use. We do not anticipate that we will be able to continue as a going concern meet our property expenditure obligations and execute our business plan for the next 12twelve months without receiving significant additional capital.  We estimate that in order to meet our minimum obligations and continue as a going concern for the next twelve months, we need to raise at least $1 million during the next year, and to conduct our anticipated exploration program at Eureka for the next twelve months would require an estimated additional $1 million.financing. Therefore, we expect to engage in financial transactions to increase our cash balance and/or decrease our cash obligations in the near term, which may include equity financings, corporate transactions, joint venture agreements, sales of non-core assets, credit facilities or debenture issuances, or other strategic transactions.


We are workingThe audit opinion and notes that accompany our consolidated financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2018 disclose a ‘going concern’ qualification to increase and maintain sufficient working capital by prioritizing our expenditures toward added-value activities and advancing transactions aimed at improving our cash position.ability to continue in business. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that we will continue as a going concern. We have also implemented significant cost-cutting measures, reduced staff, and curtailed discretionary exploration expenditures to preserve cash.incurred losses since our inception. We are also working to increase our working capital by exploring multiple financing alternativesdo not have sufficient cash to fund the executionnormal operations and meet all of our obligations for the next 12 months without deferring payment on certain current liabilities and/or raising additional funds. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. We believe that the going concern condition cannot be removed with confidence until the Company has entered into a business plan.    climate where funding of its activities is more assured. If the going concern basis were not appropriate for these financial statements, adjustments would be necessary in the carrying value of assets and liabilities, the reported expenses and the balance sheet classifications used.


We recognize that we will not be able to execute our operating plans with our current cash balances. However, withWith our current cash balance, proceeds from sales of non-core assets, our expectedanticipated ability to acquire additional capital and complete necessaryby way of asset sales and/or financing transactions, and our ability to curtail discretionary exploration expenditures as needed,needed; however, we believe that we will havebe able to generate sufficient working capital to meet our ongoing, non-discretionary operating expenses for the next 12 months and maintain our primary mineral properties. AdditionalWe recognize that additional capital will be required shortly and may be obtained through financing transactions such as asset sales, corporate transactions, equity investments, asset sales, joint ventures, debt facilities, or other types of strategic arrangements.


We plan, as funding allows, to completefollow up on our acquisition of joint venture interests atpositive results for drilling and the Induced Polarization (IP)/Resistivity survey on our Elder Creek prospect, and further surface preparations and tests at our Paiute andprospect. Also, subject to executeavailable capital, we may continue prudent exploration programs at Eureka, Elder Creekon our material exploration properties and/or fund some exploratory activities on early-stage properties. Our current working capital is not sufficient to meet our currently planned exploration costs and Paiute.  Exploration is expected to include follow-up on previous drill results and historical data and is expected to include drilling, surface mapping and sampling, metallurgical tests, and initiating and upgrading gold resource estimates.  Based upon identified potential funding opportunities, we are revising ourgeneral corporate and exploration budgets, with a focus onadministrative expenses for the advancement of the Elder Creeknext 12 months, and Windfall projects.  We recognize that we will require additional funding and/or reductions in order to execute our operating plansexploration and advance toward development of our properties, if warranted.administrative expenditures.






Given current market conditions, we cannot provide assurance that necessary financing transactions will be available on terms acceptable to us, on acceptable terms or at all. Over the past two years,Without additional financing, we would have significantly curtailedto further curtail our corporate, exploration and other expenditures however,while we recognize that we will still require additionalseek alternative funding arrangements to provide sufficient capital to meet our property obligations, fund our planned,ongoing, non-discretionary expenditures for the next 12 months and maintain our primary mineral properties. If we cannot obtain sufficient additional financing, we may be unable to make required property payments on a timely basis and be forced to return some or all of our leased or optioned properties to the underlying owners.


Financing Activities


Private Placements:

On May 8,October 18, 2018, and on December 3, 2018, we closed two tranches of a private placement offering of 7,500,000 Units of the Company at a price of $0.08 per Unit for grossnet proceeds of $600,000 (the “May 2018 Offering”).$600,000. Each Unit in the May 2018 Offeringoffering consisted of one share of common stock of the Company and one common share purchase warrant (each a “May 2018 Warrant”),Class E Warrant, with each May 2018 Warrantwarrant exercisable to acquire an additional share of our common stock of the Company at a price of $0.14 per share until the warrant expiration date of April 30,October 29, 2021.




The private placement offering was completed under Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, solely to persons who qualified as accredited investors. Subscribers who were resident in Canada were required to qualify as accredited investors under Canadian National Instrument 45-106Prospectus Exemptions.


On December 21, 2017, we closedFebruary 5, 2019, the Company announced a private placement offering of 2,880,8676,250,000 Units of the Company at a price of $0.30$0.08 per Unit for grossnet proceeds of $864,260 (the “December 2017 Offering”).$500,000, with an over-allotment of up to $100,000, or an additional 1,250,000 Units. Each Unit in the December 2017 Offeringoffering consisted of one share of common stock of the Company and one common share purchase warrant (each a “December 2017 Warrant”),Class H Warrant, with each December 2017 Warrantwarrant exercisable to acquire an additional share of common stock of the Company at a price of $0.45$0.14 per share until the warrant expiration datedate.

On March 29, 2019, we closed the sale of October 31, 2022.  Thethe first tranche of a private placement offering of Units of the Company at a price of $0.08 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one share of our common stock and one common share purchase Class H warrant, with each warrant exercisable to acquire an additional share of our common stock at a price of $0.14 per share until March 30, 2022. Accredited investors subscribed for 2,000,000 Units on a private placement basis at a price of $0.08 per unit for total proceeds of $160,000. The Offering is authorized for up to 7.5 million Units for a total of $600,000 was completed underexpected to close in April 2019, subject to the satisfaction of certain regulatory requirements.

On June 14, 2019, the Company closed the sale of 1,000,000 Units, the second tranche of a private placement offering of up to 7,500,000 Units of the Company at a price of $0.08 per Unit, for total proceeds of $80,000. Each Unit of the offering consists of one share of common stock of the Company and one common share purchase Class H warrant, with each warrant exercisable to acquire an additional share of common stock of the Company at a price of $0.14 per share until March 30, 2022. As a result, 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and 1,000,000 Warrants were issued.

The Units were offered and sold solely to persons who qualify as “accredited investors” as defined in Rule 506(b)501(a) of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended solely(the “Securities Act”) pursuant to persons who qualifiedRule 506(b) under the Securities Act based on documentation and representations provided by the investors to the Company reasonably confirming their status as accredited investors.  Subscribers who

Senior Unsecured Notes Payable:

On May 8, 2019, the Company entered into an additional binding loan agreement and promissory note with William Matlack. Under the loan agreement, the Lender loaned the Company $250,000 in the form of a senior unsecured note, with the principal bearing interest at an annual rate of 18%, compounded monthly. The loan is unsecured and the principal and accrued interest will become due for repayment on November 7, 2020, but may be repaid early without penalty.

Pursuant to the terms of the loan agreement, the Company issued to the Lender 3,543,600 non-transferrable Series I Warrants to purchase common shares of the Company. The exercise price of the warrants is $0.07, with a term of eighteen months, and the warrants contain a provision restricting their exercise in the event any such exercise would cause the Lender to own 10% or more of the Company’s outstanding common shares. The relative fair value of the warrants issued in connection with the senior unsecured note was estimated at $94,300, based upon a total fair value as calculated by a Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The relative fair value of the warrants was recorded as a discount of the note, with $6,174 amortized to interest expense in the quarter and nine months ended June 30, 2019. At June 30, 2019, the note payable was $161,874, net of the unamortized discount of $88,126.

2018 Stock and Incentive Plan

On December 1, 2018, we held a Special Meeting of Stockholders, with the following matters voted on:

Proposal #1: To ratify the appointment of DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2019 fiscal year.

Proposal #2: To approve the adoption of the Company’s 2018 Stock and Incentive Plan.

Proposal #3: To allow the purchase of shares of common stock of the Company by Americas Gold Exploration Inc. (AGEI), of which Donald McDowell, a director of AGEI, is the principal shareholder, the Company’s Vice President of Corporate Development and a director of the Timberline, the result of which will be Mr. McDowell owning over 20% of the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock.




Proposal #4: To approve an amendment the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to change the name of the Company from “Timberline Resources Corporation” to a name to be selected by the Board of Directors of the Company.

Our executive officers and directors are participants in the 2018 Stock and Incentive Plan. A description of the material terms of the 2018 Stock and Incentive Plan is set forth under the heading “Proposal 2 – Approval of the Adoption of the 2018 Incentive Plan” in our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A as filed with the Commission on October 22, 2018 as is incorporated herein by reference.

Proxies were residentsolicited under the proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 22, 2018. Our appointment of DeCoria, Maichel & Teague P.S. to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2019 fiscal year was ratified. The proposal to approve the adoption of the Timberline 2018 Stock and Incentive Plan was approved. The proposal to allow Americas Gold Exploration Inc. to purchase shares of common stock resulting in Canada were requiredDon McDowell owning over 20% of the Company was approved. The proposal allows the Board of Directors to qualifyamend the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to change the name of the Company was approved.

Subsequent Events

On July 11, 2019, the Company entered into the Definitive Agreement to form the joint venture with PM & Gold Mines, Inc. (“PM&G” and together with Timberline, the “JV Partners”) whereby the JV Partners formed a limited liability company to conduct operations on the Company’s Lookout Mountain Project in Nevada (the “Project”) pursuant to a limited liability company agreement (the “Agreement”) Pursuant to the Agreement, PM&G can earn an initial 51% interest in the project, which is located on the southern end of the Battle Mountain-Eureka Trend, by expending $6 million on exploration and development over a 2-year period, as accredited investorsfurther described below. 

In connection with the Agreement as approved by the TSX Venture Exchange, further to Timberline’s February 8, 2019 news release announcing a $500,000 non-brokered private placement of Timberline units at a price of $0.08 per unit (the “Offering”), PM&G has subscribed for a 4.99% ownership position in the Company under Canadian National Instrument 45-106Prospectus Exemptions.the Offering. Pursuant to additional Offering subscriptions received, the Company closed the Offering on a fully subscribed basis following TSX Venture Exchange approval of the Offering and Agreement. Total shares issued under the Agreement was 3,367,441, with a like number of warrants, for cash proceeds of $269,395.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, results of operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates


See Note 2 to the financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report for a summary of the significant accounting policies used in the presentation of our financial statements. We are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. We believe that our most critical accounting estimates are related to asset impairments and asset retirement obligations.


Our critical accounting policies and estimates are as follows:


Asset Impairments


Significant property acquisition payments for active exploration properties are capitalized. The evaluation of our mineral properties for impairment is based on market conditions for minerals, underlying mineralized material associated with the properties, and future costs that may be required for ultimate realization through mining operations or by sale. If no mineable ore body is discovered, or market conditions for minerals deteriorate, there is the potential for a material adjustment to the value assigned to such mineral properties.


We review the carrying value of equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment or abandonment loss is recognized equal to an amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the equipment is used, and the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic factors.








Asset Retirement Obligations


We have an obligation to reclaim our properties after the surface has been disturbed by exploration methods at the site. As a result, we have recorded a liability for the fair value of the reclamation costs we expect to incur at ourLookout Mountain Project. We estimate applicable inflation and credit-adjusted risk-free rates as well as expected reclamation time frames. To the extent that the estimated reclamation costs change, such changes will impact future reclamation expense recorded.A liability is recognized for the present value of estimated environmental remediation (asset retirement obligation) in the period in which the liability is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The offsetting balance is charged to the related long-lived asset. Adjustments are made to the liability for changes resulting from passage of time and changes to either the timing or amount of the original present value estimate underlying the obligation.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


Not applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


Conclusions of Management Regarding Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures


At the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a – 15(e) and Rule 15d – 15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this report). Based on that evaluation, our management, including the Principal Executive Officer and the Principal Financial Officer, has concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in ensuring that: (i) information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that we file or submit to the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms and (ii) material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for accurate and timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Management determined that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting due primarily to minimal staffing at the Company and the resulting weakness related to appropriate segregation of duties. While the Company does adhere to a system of internal controls and processes that were designed and implemented by a respected national accounting firm, it is difficult with a very limited staff to maintain appropriate segregation of duties in the initiating and recording of transactions, thereby creating a segregation of duties weakness. Subject to available capital, we anticipate improving the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures on a long-term basis by increasing staffing levels and segregating certain duties.


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting


There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.




PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.


We are not aware of any material pending litigation or of any proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities which are, or would be, likely to have a material adverse effect upon us or our operations, taken as a whole. No director, officer or affiliate of Timberline and no owner of record or beneficial owner of more than 5% of our securities or any associate of any such director, officer or security holder is a party adverse to Timberline or has a material interest adverse to Timberline in reference to any currently pending litigation.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS


There have been no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2017,2018, which was filed with the SEC on December 20, 2017.27, 2018.





ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.


All sales of unregistered equity securities during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q were previously reported on Form 8-K.

ITEM 3.  DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

 

None.

ITEM 4.  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES


We consider health, safety and environmental stewardship to be a core value for the Company.


Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the United States are required to disclose in their periodic reports filed with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities with respect to mining operations and properties in the United States that are subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”). During the quarter ended June 30, 2018,2019, our U.S. exploration properties were not subject to regulation by the MSHA under the Mine Act.

ITEM 5.  OTHER INFORMATION.INFORMATION

 

None.





ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.   EXHIBITS

 

 

 

 

3.1

Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant as amended through October 31, 2014, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 23, 2014

3.2

Amended By-Laws of the Registrant,, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 13, 2015.

4.1

Specimen of the Common Stock Certificate,, incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10SB as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on September 29, 2005

4.2

Form of Warrant Agreement for May and June 2016 Offering incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2016

4.3

Form of Warrant Agreement for March and April 2017 Offering of Units,, incorporated by reference to the Company’s 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2017

4.4

Form of Warrant Agreement for November and December 2017 Offering,, incorporated by reference to the Company’s 10-Q8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 26, 2018

4.5*

Form of Warrant Agreement for May 2018 Offering24,2018

10.1*4.4*

Purchase Agreement with Americas Gold Exploration, Inc.Form of Series G Warrant

10.2*31.1*

Amendment to Purchase Agreement with Americas Gold Exploration, Inc.

31.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Exchange Act)

31.2*

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Exchange Act)

32.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

32.2*

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

101.INS*

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE*

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


* - Filed herewith








SIGNATURES

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

TIMBERLINE RESOURCES CORPORATION

 


By:  /s/ Steven A. Osterberg

      ___________________________________

      Steven A. Osterberg

      President and Chief Executive Officer

      (Principal Executive Officer)


Date:  August 10, 201814, 2019



 


By:  /s/ Randal L. HardyTed R. Sharp

      ___________________________________

      Randal L. HardyTed R. Sharp

      Chief Financial Officer

      (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Date:  August 10, 201814, 2019




 

 







2438