UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


[X] X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the quarterly period endedSeptember 30, December 31, 2014

OR

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


For the transition period from ___________________________  To  _____________________________

Commission file number:000-31203

NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida98-0171860
(State or other jurisdiction(IRS Employer

of incorporation or organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)

President Place, 4th Floor, Cnr. Jan Smuts Avenue and Bolton Road
Rosebank, Johannesburg 2196, South Africa

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:27-11-343-2000

Not Applicable

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES  [X][ X ]  NO  [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
YES  [X][ X ]  NO  [   ]


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

[  ]Large accelerated filer[X] X ] Accelerated filer
  
[   ]Non-accelerated filer[   ]Smaller reporting company
(do not check if a smaller reporting company) 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
YES  [   ]  NO  [X[ X ]

As of November 4, 2014February 3, 2015 (the latest practicable date), 46,475,62346,547,153 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, net of treasury shares, were outstanding.



Form 10-Q

NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Table of Contents

   Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION  
     Item 1.Financial Statements 
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30,Decenber 31, 2014 and June 30, 20142
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended September 30,ended December 31, 2014 and 20133
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 20134
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the ThreeSix Months Ended September 30,December 31, 20145
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three and Six Months Ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 20136
  Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements7
     Item 2.Management’sManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations2324
     Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk3237
     Item 4.Controls and Procedures3237
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION  
     Item 1.Legal Proceedings3338
     Item 1A.Risk Factors3338
     Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds3439
     Item 6.Exhibits3439
     Signatures 35
     EXHIBIT 10.29 
     EXHIBIT 31.1
     EXHIBIT 31.2
     EXHIBIT 32 

1


Part I. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements

NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

 Unaudited  (A)  Unaudited  (A) 
 September 30,  June 30,  December 31,  June 30, 
 2014  2014  2014  2014 
 (In thousands, except share data)  (In thousands, except share data) 
ASSETS ASSETS  ASSETS  
CURRENT ASSETS            
Cash and cash equivalents$ 81,185 $ 58,672 $ 70,981 $ 58,672 
Pre-funded social welfare grants receivable (Note 2) 4,863  4,809  6,254  4,809 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of – September: $2,075; June: $1,313 136,701  148,067 
Finance loans receivable, net of allowances of – September: $3,136; June: $3,083 53,884  53,124 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of – December: $2,175; June: $1,313 128,338  148,067 
Finance loans receivable, net of allowances of – December: $4,403; June: $3,083 60,309  53,124 
Inventory (Note 3) 12,200  10,785  12,501  10,785 
Deferred income taxes 7,045  7,451  6,286  7,451 
Total current assets before settlement assets 295,878  282,908  284,669  282,908 
Settlement assets (Note 4) 724,279  725,987  480,962  725,987 
Total current assets 1,020,157  1,008,895  765,631  1,008,895 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation of –
September: $92,753; June: $91,422
 48,739  47,797 
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation of – December: $94,376; June: $91,42249,36147,797
EQUITY-ACCOUNTED INVESTMENTS 934  878  954  878 
GOODWILL (Note 6) 179,003  186,576  172,237  186,576 
INTANGIBLE ASSETS, net (Note 6) 62,148  68,514  55,884  68,514 
OTHER LONG-TERM ASSETS, including reinsurance assets (Note 5 and Note 7) 36,533  38,285  35,426  38,285 
TOTAL ASSETS 1,347,514  1,350,945  1,079,493  1,350,945 
LIABILITIES LIABILITIES  LIABILITIES  
CURRENT LIABILITIES            
Accounts payable 14,941  17,101  15,838  17,101 
Other payables 43,346  42,257  39,263  42,257 
Current portion of long-term borrowings (Note 9) 14,276  14,789  -  14,789 
Income taxes payable 13,581  7,676  3,094  7,676 
Total current liabilities before settlement obligations 86,144  81,823  58,195  81,823 
Settlement obligations (Note 4) 724,279  725,987  480,962  725,987 
Total current liabilities 810,423  807,810  539,157  807,810 
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 14,078  15,522  12,676  15,522 
LONG-TERM BORROWINGS (Note 9) 61,288  62,388  59,698  62,388 
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES, including insurance policy liabilities (Note 7) 22,396  23,477  20,831  23,477 
TOTAL LIABILITIES 908,185  909,197  632,362  909,197 
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 17)            
EQUITY EQUITY  EQUITY  
COMMON STOCK (Note 10)      
Authorized: 200,000,000 with $0.001 par value;
Issued and outstanding shares, net of treasury - September: 46,475,623;
June: 47,819,299
 64  63 
PREFERRED STOCK      
Authorized shares: 50,000,000 with $0.001 par value;
Issued and outstanding shares, net of treasury: September: -; June: -
 -  - 
COMMON STOCK (Note 10)
Authorized: 200,000,000 with $0.001 par value;
Issued and outstanding shares, net of treasury - December: 46,547,153;
June: 47,819,299
6463
PREFERRED STOCK
Authorized shares: 50,000,000 with $0.001 par value;
Issued and outstanding shares, net of treasury: December: -; June: -
--
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN-CAPITAL 210,708  202,401  211,743  202,401 
TREASURY SHARES, AT COST: September: 18,057,228; June: 15,883,212 (214,520) (200,681)
TREASURY SHARES, AT COST: December: 18,057,228; June: 15,883,212 (214,520) (200,681)
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (104,126) (82,741) (120,504) (82,741)
RETAINED EARNINGS 547,222  522,729  569,596  522,729 
TOTAL NET1 EQUITY 439,348  441,771  446,379  441,771 
NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST (19) (23) 752  (23)
TOTAL EQUITY 439,329  441,748  447,131  441,748 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY$ 1,347,514 $ 1,350,945 $ 1,079,493 $ 1,350,945 

(A) – Derived from audited financial statements


See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

2


NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

 Three months ended  Three months ended  Six months ended 
 September 30,  December 31,  December 31, 
 2014  2013  2014  2013  2014  2013 
 (In thousands, except per share data)  (In thousands, except per share data) (In thousands, except per share data) 
           
REVENUE$ 156,441 $ 123,494 $ 154,131 $137,283 $ 310,572 $260,777 
          
EXPENSE       
       
Cost of goods sold, IT processing, servicing and support 74,406  56,559  71,774 67,883 146,180 124,442 
       
Selling, general and administration 38,736  40,506  41,385 40,824 80,121 81,330 
       
Depreciation and amortization 10,174  10,029  10,157  9,774  20,331  19,803 
       
OPERATING INCOME 33,125  16,400  30,815 18,802 63,940 35,202 
       
INTEREST INCOME 4,090  3,319  3,587 3,236 7,677 6,555 
       
INTEREST EXPENSE 1,312  1,752  1,107  2,226  2,419  3,978 
       
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE 35,903  17,967  33,295 19,812 69,198 37,779 
       
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (Note 16) 11,648  6,485  10,203  7,099  21,851  13,584 
       
NET INCOME BEFORE EARNINGS FROM EQUITY-ACCOUNTED INVESTMENTS 24,255  11,482  23,092 12,713 47,347 24,195 
       
EARNINGS FROM EQUITY-ACCOUNTED INVESTMENTS 92  103  76  47  168  150 
       
NET INCOME 24,347  11,585  23,168 12,760 47,515 24,345 
       
LESS (ADD) NET (INCOME) LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST 258  (11)
LESS NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST 794  11  1,052  - 
       
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO NET1$ 24,089 $ 11,596 $ 22,374 $12,749 $ 46,463 $24,345 
          
Net income per share, in United States dollars(Note 13)           
 
Basic earnings attributable to Net1 shareholders$0.51 $0.25 $0.48 $0.28 $0.99 $0.53 
 
Diluted earnings attributable to Net1 shareholders$0.51 $0.25 $0.48 $0.28 $0.99 $0.53 

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

3


NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

 Three months ended  Three months ended  Six months ended 
 September 30,  December 31,  December 31, 
 2014  2013  2014  2013  2014  2013 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) (In thousands) 
                 
Net income$ 24,347 $ 11,585 $ 23,168 $12,760 $ 47,515 $ 24,345 
               
Other comprehensive (loss) income               
Net unrealized loss on asset available for sale, net of tax (226) (255)-216(226)(39)
Movement in foreign currency translation reserve (21,185) 7,569 (16,401)(2,597)(37,586)4,972
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of taxes (21,411) 7,314 (16,401)(2,381)(37,812)4,933
               
Comprehensive income 2,936  18,899  6,767 10,379 9,703 29,278 
(Less) Add comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interest (232) 11 
Less comprehensive income attributable to non-controlling interest(771)(11)(1,003)-
Comprehensive income attributable to Net1$ 2,704 $ 18,910 $5,996$10,368$8,700$29,278

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

4


NET 1 UEPSTECHNOLOGIES, INC.
UnauditedCondensedConsolidatedStatement ofChanges in Equity for the threesixmonths endedSeptemberDecember 30,31, 2014 (dollaramounts inthousands)

 Net 1 UEPS Technologies, Inc. Shareholders   
               Accumulated        Net 1 UEPS Technologies, Inc. Shareholders  
     Number of   Number of Additional   other   Non-     Accumulated  
 Number of   Treasury Treasury shares, net of Paid-In Retained comprehensive Total Net1 controlling     Number of Number of Additional other Non-  
 Shares  Amount  Shares  Shares  treasury  Capital  Earnings  loss  Equity  Interest  Total  Number of   Treasury Treasury shares, net of Paid-In Retained comprehensive Total Net1 controlling   
                        Shares  Amount  Shares  Shares  treasury  Capital  Earnings  loss  Equity  Interest  Total 
Balance – July 1, 2014 63,702,511 $63 (15,883,212)$(200,681) 47,819,299 $202,401 $522,729 $(82,741)$441,771 $(23)$441,748  63,702,511 $63 (15,883,212)$(200,681) 47,819,299 $202,401 $522,729 $(82,741)$441,771 $(23)$441,748 
                       
Repurchase of common stock (Note 10)      (1,837,432) (9,151) (1,837,432)        (9,151)    (9,151) (1,837,432) (9,151) (1,837,432) (9,151) (9,151)
                            
Restricted stock granted (Note 12) 141,707         141,707         -     -  213,237 213,237 - - 
                             
Exercise of stock option (Note 12) 688,633 1 (336,584) (4,688) 352,049 5,677       990     990  688,633 1 (336,584) (4,688) 352,049 5,677 990 990 
                           
Stock-based compensation charge (Note 12)       916     916    916       1,951   1,951  1,951 
                            
Income tax benefit from vested stock awards       483     483    483       483   483  483 
                            
Transactions with non-controlling interests (Note 10)       1,231 404    1,635 (228) 1,407       1,231 404  1,635 (228) 1,407 
                          
Net income              24,089     24,089 258 24,347  46,463 46,463 1,052 47,515 
                          
Other comprehensive loss (Note 11)                (21,385) (21,385) (26) (21,411) (37,763) (37,763) (49) (37,812)
                        
Balance – September 30, 2014 64,532,851 $64 (18,057,228)$(214,520) 46,475,623 $210,708 $547,222 $(104,126)$439,348 $(19)$439,329 
Balance – December 31, 2014 64,604,381 $64 (18,057,228)$(214,520) 46,547,153 $211,743 $569,596 $(120,504)$446,379 $752 $447,131 

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

5


NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 Three months ended  Three months ended  Six months ended 
 September 30,  December 31,  December 31, 
 2014  2013  2014  2013  2014  2013 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Cash flows from operating activities                  
Net income$ 24,347 $ 11,585 $ 23,168 $ 12,760 $ 47,515 $ 24,345 
Depreciation and amortization 10,174  10,029  10,157  9,774  20,331  19,803 
Earnings from equity-accounted investments (92) (103) (76) (47) (168) (150)
Fair value adjustments 413  (133) (234) 72  179  (61)
Interest payable 1,159  972  140  694  1,299  1,666 
Profit on disposal of plant and equipment (122) (1)
Profit on disposal of property, plant and equipment (109) (15) (231) (16)
Stock-based compensation charge 916  930  1,035  968  1,951  1,898 
Facility fee amortized 82  69  52  509  134  578 
Decrease (Increase) in accounts receivable, pre-funded social welfare grants receivable and finance loans receivable 9,470  (23,101)
(Increase) Decrease in inventory (2,123) 1,011 
Increase in accounts receivable, pre-funded social            
welfare grants receivable and finance loans receivable(7,315)(37,977)2,155(61,078)
Increase in inventory (622) (2,853) (2,745) (1,842)
Decrease in accounts payable and other payables (10,933) (8,668) (1,456) (4,883) (12,389) (13,551)
Increase in taxes payable 6,611  6,921 
(Decrease) increase in taxes payable (9,963) (5,559) (3,352) 1,362 
Decrease in deferred taxes (390) (1,187) (168) (691) (558) (1,878)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 39,512  (1,676)
Net cash provided (used in ) by operatingactivities 14,609 (27,248) 54,121 (28,924)
          
Cash flows from investing activities                  
Capital expenditures (9,378) (5,616) (9,137) (6,845) (18,515) (12,461)
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment 241  48 3731,9536142,001
Proceeds from sale of business (Note 14) 1,895  -  -  -  1,895  - 
Other investing activities, net -  (1)
Other investing activities (29) -  (29) (1)
Net change in settlement assets (43,054) 51,773  241,652  204,730  198,598  256,503 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (50,296) 46,204 
Net cash provided by investing activities 232,859  199,838  182,563  246,042 
          
Cash flows from financing activities                  
Repayment of long-term borrowings (Note 9) (14,128) (87,008) (14,128) (87,008)
Long-term borrowings utilized 1,081  -  2,178  - 
Acquisition of treasury stock (Note 10) (9,151) -  -  -  (9,151) - 
Sale of equity to non-controlling interest (Note 10) 1,407  -  -  -  1,407  - 
Long-term borrowings utilized 1,097  - 
Proceeds from issue of common stock 989  -  -  -  989  - 
Long-term borrowings obtained -  71,605  -  71,605 
Payment of facility fee -  (872) -  (872)
Proceeds from bank overdraft -  24,580  -  24,580 
Acquisition of interests in KSNET (Note 10) -  (1,968) -  (1,968)
Net change in settlement obligations 43,054  (51,773) (241,652) (204,730) (198,598) (256,503)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 37,396  (51,773)
Net cash used in financing activities (254,699) (198,393) (217,303) (250,166)
              
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash (4,099) 1,250  (2,973) 495  (7,072) 1,745 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 22,513  (5,995)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cashequivalents(10,204)(25,308)12,309(31,303)
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of period 58,672  53,665  81,185  47,670  58,672  53,665 
Cash and cash equivalents – end of period$ 81,185 $ 47,670 $ 70,981 $ 22,362 $ 70,981 $ 22,362 

See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

6


NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Notes to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
for the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013

(All amounts in tables stated in thousands or thousands of United States Dollars, unless otherwise stated)

1.

Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

1. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all majority-owned subsidiaries over which the Company exercises control and have been prepared in accordance with US generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and include all of the information and disclosures required for interim financial reporting. The results of operations for the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. The Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements, accounting policies and financial notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments), which are necessary for a fair representation of financial results for the interim periods presented.

References to the “Company” refer to Net1 and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. References to Net1 are references solely to Net 1 UEPS Technologies, Inc.

Recent accounting pronouncements adopted

 In March 2013, the FASB issued guidance regardingParent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment Upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets Within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity. This guidance requires that the parent release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2014, and is applied prospectively. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as of September 30,December 31, 2014

 In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance regardingRevenue from Contracts with Customers. This guidance requires an entity to recognize revenue when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the standard requires disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company expects that this guidance will have a material impact on its financial statements and is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on its financial statements on adoption.

In August 2014, the FASB issued guidance regardingDisclosure of Uncertainties About an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. This guidance requires an entity to perform interim and annual assessments of its ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date that its financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The guidance is effective for the Company for beginning July 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this guidance on its financial statements disclosure.

2.

Pre-funded social welfare grants receivable

2. Pre-funded social welfare grants receivable

Pre-funded social welfare grants receivable represents amounts pre-funded by the Company to certain merchants participating in the merchant acquiring system. The October 2014January 2015 payment service commenced on OctoberJanuary 1, 2014,2015, but the Company pre-funded certain merchants participating in the merchant acquiring system on the last two days of SeptemberDecember 2014.

7



3.

Inventory

3. Inventory

The Company’s inventory comprised the following categories as of September 30,December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014.

  September 30,  June 30, 
  2014  2014 
Finished goods$12,200 $10,785 
 $12,200 $10,785 
   December 31,  June 30, 
   2014  2014 
 Finished goods$12,501 $10,785 
  $12,501 $10,785 

4.

Settlement assets and settlement obligations

4. Settlement assets and settlement obligations

Settlement assets comprise (1) cash received from the South African government that the Company holds pending disbursement to recipient cardholders of social welfare grants and (2) cash received from customers on whose behalf the Company processes payroll payments that the Company will disburse to customer employees, payroll-related payees and other payees designated by the customer.

Settlement obligations comprise (1) amounts that the Company is obligated to disburse to recipient cardholders of social welfare grants, (2) amounts that the Company is obligated to pay to customer employees, payroll-related payees and other payees designated by the customer.

The balances at each reporting date may vary widely depending on the timing of the receipts and payments of these assets and obligations.

5.

Fair value of financial instruments

5. Fair value of financial instruments

Fair value of financial instruments

Initial recognition and measurement

Financial instruments are recognized when the Company becomes a party to the transaction. Initial measurements are at cost, which includes transaction costs.

Risk management

The Company seeks to reduce its exposure to currencies other than the South African Rand (“ZAR”) through a policy of matching, to the extent possible, assets and liabilities denominated in those currencies. In addition, the Company uses financial instruments in order to economically hedge its exposure to exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations arising from its operations. The Company is also exposed to equity price and liquidity risks as well as credit risks.

Currency exchange risk

The Company is subject to currency exchange risk because it purchases inventories that it is required to settle in other currencies, primarily the euro and US dollar. The Company has used forward contracts in order to limit its exposure in these transactions to fluctuations in exchange rates between the ZAR, on the one hand, and the US dollar and the euro, on the other hand.

Translation risk

Translation risk relates to the risk that the Company’s results of operations will vary significantly as the US dollar is its reporting currency, but it earns most of its revenues and incurs most of its expenses in ZAR. The US dollar to ZAR exchange rate has fluctuated significantly over the past three years. As exchange rates are outside the Company’s control, there can be no assurance that future fluctuations will not adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

Interest rate risk

As a result of its normal borrowing and leasing activities, the Company’s operating results are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates, which it manages primarily through regular financing activities. The Company generally maintains limited investment in cash equivalents and has occasionally invested in marketable securities.

8



5.

Fair value of financial instruments (continued)

5. Fair value of financial instruments (continued)

Fair value of financial instruments (continued)

Risk management (continued)

Credit risk

Credit risk relates to the risk of loss that the Company would incur as a result of non-performance by counterparties. The Company maintains credit risk policies with regard to its counterparties to minimize overall credit risk. These policies include an evaluation of a potential counterparty’s financial condition, credit rating, and other credit criteria and risk mitigation tools as the Company’s management deems appropriate.

With respect to credit risk on financial instruments, the Company maintains a policy of entering into such transactions only with South African and European financial institutions that have a credit rating of BBB or better, as determined by credit rating agencies such as Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch Ratings.

UEPS-based microlending credit risk

The Company is exposed to credit risk in its UEPS-based microlending activities, which provides unsecured short-term loans to qualifying customers. The Company manages this risk by performing an affordability test for each prospective customer and assigns a “creditworthiness score”, which takes into account a variety of factors such as other debts and total expenditures on normal household and lifestyle expenses.

Equity price and liquidity risk

Equity price risk relates to the risk of loss that the Company would incur as a result of the volatility in the exchange-traded price of equity securities that it holds and the risk that it may not be able to liquidate these securities. The market price of these securities may fluctuate for a variety of reasons, consequently, the amount the Company may obtain in a subsequent sale of these securities may significantly differ from the reported market value.

Liquidity risk relates to the risk of loss that the Company would incur as a result of the lack of liquidity on the exchange on which these securities are listed. The Company may not be able to sell some or all of these securities at one time, or over an extended period of time without influencing the exchange traded price, or at all.

Financial instruments

The following section describes the valuation methodologies the Company uses to measure its significant financial assets and liabilities at fair value.

 In general, and where applicable, the Company uses quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities to determine fair value. This pricing methodology applies to Level 1 investments. If quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities are not available to determine fair value, then the Company uses quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities or inputs other than the quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly. These investments are included in Level 2 investments. In circumstances in which inputs are generally unobservable, values typically reflect management’s estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The fair values are therefore determined using model-based techniques that include option pricing models, discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques. Investments valued using such techniques are included in Level 3 investments.

Asset measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs – investment in Finbond Group Limited (“Finbond”)

The Company's Level 3 asset represents an investment of 156,788,712 shares of common stock of Finbond, which are exchange-traded equity securities. Finbond’s shares are traded on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (“JSE”) and the Company has designated such shares as available for sale investments. The Company has concluded that the market for Finbond shares is not active and consequently has employed alternative valuation techniques in order to determine the fair value of such stock. Finbond issues financial products and services under a mutual banking licence and also has a microlending offering. In determining the fair value of Finbond, the Company has considered amongst other things Finbond’s historical financial information (including its most recent public accounts), press releases issued by Finbond and its published net asset value. The Company believes that the best indicator of fair value of Finbond is its published net asset value and has used this value to determine the fair value.

9



5.

Fair value of financial instruments (continued)

5. Fair value of financial instruments (continued)

Financial instruments (continued)

       Asset measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs – investment in Finbond Group Limited (“Finbond”) (continued)

The fair value of these securities as of September 30,December 31, 2014, represented approximately 1% of the Company’s total assets, including these securities. The Company expects to hold these securities for an extended period of time and it is not concerned with short-term equity price volatility with respect to these securities provided that the underlying business, economic and management characteristics of the company remain sound.

Derivative transactions - Foreign exchange contracts

As part of the Company’s risk management strategy, the Company enters into derivative transactions to mitigate exposures to foreign currencies using foreign exchange contracts. These foreign exchange contracts are over-the-counter derivative transactions. Substantially all of the Company’s derivative exposures are with counterparties that have long-term credit ratings of BBB or better. The Company uses quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities to determine fair value (level(Level 2). The Company has no derivatives that require fair value measurement under levelLevel 1 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company’s outstanding foreign exchange contracts are as follows:

As of September 30,December 31, 2014

  Fair market 
Notional amountStrike pricevalue priceMaturity
EUR 181,570.50ZAR 15.5739ZAR 14.3053October 20, 2014
EUR 181,570.50ZAR 15.4316ZAR 14.3053October 20, 2014
EUR 180,022.50ZAR 15.6552ZAR 14.3818November 20, 2014
EUR 180,022.50ZAR 15.5136ZAR 14.3818November 20, 2014
EUR 180,022.50ZAR 15.5970ZAR 14.4701December 22, 2014
EUR 180,022.50ZAR 15.7391ZAR 14.4701December 22, 2014
EUR 174,424.50ZAR 15.8119ZAR 14.551115.6729ZAR 14.1043January 20, 2015
EUR 174,424.50ZAR 15.6729ZAR 14.551115.8119ZAR 14.1043January 20, 2015
EUR 938,834.00ZAR 14.7811ZAR 14.2503March 20, 2015
EUR 706,205.00ZAR 14.8645ZAR 14.3307April 20, 2015
EUR 512,865.00ZAR 14.9455ZAR 14.4113May 20, 2015
EUR 526,263.00ZAR 15.0345ZAR 14.5000June 22, 2015
EUR 526,263.00ZAR 15.1145ZAR 14.5762July 20, 2015
EUR 526,263.00ZAR 15.2025ZAR 14.6619August 20, 2015
EUR 526,263.00ZAR 15.2944ZAR 14.7502September 21, 2015
EUR 526,263.00ZAR 15.3809ZAR 14.8329October 20, 2015
EUR 509,516.00ZAR 15.4728ZAR 14.9238November 20, 2015
EUR 529,865.00ZAR 15.5654ZAR 15.0147December 21, 2015
EUR 526,663.00ZAR 15.6625ZAR 15.1057January 20, 2016

As of June 30, 2014

 

 Fair market 

Notional amount

Strike pricevalue priceMaturity

EUR 182,272.50

ZAR 15.2077ZAR 14.5803July 21, 2014

EUR 182,272.50

ZAR 15.3488ZAR 14.5803July 21, 2014

EUR 180,022.50

ZAR 15.4228ZAR 14.6542August 20, 2014

EUR 180,022.50

ZAR 15.2819ZAR 14.6542August 20, 2014

EUR 180,022.50

ZAR 15.3623ZAR 14.7367September 22, 2014

EUR 180,022.50

ZAR 15.5041ZAR 14.7367September 22, 2014

EUR 181,570.50

ZAR 15.5739ZAR 14.8119October 20, 2014

EUR 181,570.50

ZAR 15.4316ZAR 14.8119October 20, 2014

EUR 180,022.50

ZAR 15.6552ZAR 14.8982November 20, 2014

EUR 180,022.50

ZAR 15.5136ZAR 14.8982November 20, 2014

EUR 180,022.50

ZAR 15.5970ZAR 14.9874December 22, 2014

EUR 180,022.50

ZAR 15.7391ZAR 14.9874December 22, 2014

EUR 174,424.50

ZAR 15.8119ZAR 15.0671January 20, 2015

EUR 174,424.50

ZAR 15.6729ZAR 15.0671January 20, 2015

10



5.

Fair value of financial instruments (continued)

5. Fair value of financial instruments (continued)

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30,December 31, 2014, according to the fair value hierarchy:

  Quoted          
  Price in          
  Active  Significant       
  Markets for  Other  Significant    
  Identical  Observable  Unobservable    
  Assets  Inputs  Inputs    
  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total 
Assets            
   Related to insurance business (included in
   other long-term assets):
       Cash and cash equivalents$1,716 $- $- $1,716 
   Investment in Finbond (available for sale assets
   included in other long-term assets)
--7,5847,584
   Other -  45  -  45 
       Total assets at fair value$1,716 $45 $7,584 $9,345 
Liabilities            
   Foreign exchange contracts$- $152 $- $152 
       Total liabilities at fair value$- $152 $- $152 
   Quoted          
   Price in          
   Active  Significant       
   Markets for  Other  Significant    
   Identical  Observable  Unobservable    
   Assets  Inputs  Inputs    
   (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total 
 Assets            
     Related to insurance business (included in
    other long-term assets):
        
        Cash and cash equivalents$1,688 $- $- $1,688 
     Investment in Finbond (available for sale
     assets included in other long-term assets)
--7,3587,358
    Other -  44  -  44 
        Total assets at fair value$1,688 $44 $7,358 $9,090 
 Liabilities            
    Foreign exchange contracts$- $345 $- $345 
        Total liabilities at fair value$- $345 $- $345 

The following table presents the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2014, according to the fair value hierarchy:

  Quoted          
  Price in          
  Active  Significant       
  Markets for  Other  Significant    
  Identical  Observable  Unobservable    
  Assets  Inputs  Inputs    
  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total 
Assets            
   Related to insurance business (included in 
   other long-term assets):
       Cash and cash equivalents$1,800 $- $- $1,800 
   Investment in Finbond (available for sale assets
   included in other long-term assets)
--8,0688,068
   Other -  47  -  47 
       Total assets at fair value$1,800 $47 $8,068 $9,915 
Liabilities            
   Foreign exchange contracts$- $164 $- $164 
       Total liabilities at fair value$- $164 $- $164 
   Quoted          
   Price in          
   Active  Significant       
   Markets for  Other  Significant    
   Identical  Observable  Unobservable    
   Assets  Inputs  Inputs    
   (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3) Total 
 Assets            
     Related to insurance business (included in
    other long-term assets):
        
          Cash and cash equivalents$1,800 $- $- $1,800 
      Investment in Finbond (available for sale
     assets included in other long-term assets)
--8,0688,068
    Other -  47  -  47 
         Total assets at fair value$1,800 $47 $8,068 $9,915 
 Liabilities            
     Foreign exchange contracts$- $164 $- $164 
        Total liabilities at fair value$- $164 $- $164 

Changes in the Company’s investment in Finbond (Level 3 that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis) were insignificant during the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. There have been no transfers in or out of Level 3 during the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

The Company measures its assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis when they are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. The Company has no liabilities that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. The Company reviews the carrying values of its assets when events and circumstances warrant and considers all available evidence in evaluating when declines in fair value are other-than-temporary. The fair values of the Company’s assets are determined using the best information available, and may include quoted market prices, market comparables, and discounted cash flow projections. An impairment charge is recorded when the cost of the assets exceeds its fair value and the excess is determined to be other-than-temporary. The Company has not recorded any impairment charges during the reporting periods presented herein.

11



6.

Goodwill and intangible assets, net

Goodwill
Summarized below is the movement in the carrying value of goodwill for the three and six months ended December 31, 2014: 
      Accumulated  Carrying 
   Gross value  impairment  value 
 Balance as of June 30, 2014$186,576 $- $186,576 
      Foreign currency adjustment(1) (14,339) -  (14,339)
              Balance as of December 31, 2014$172,237 $- $172,237 

6. Goodwill and intangible assets, net

Goodwill

     Summarized below is the movement in the carrying value of goodwill for the three months ended September 30, 2014:

      Accumulated  Carrying 
   Gross value  impairment  value 
 Balance as of June 30, 2014$186,576 $- $186,576 
      Foreign currency adjustment(1) (7,573) -  (7,573)
              Balance as of September 30, 2014$179,003 $0 $179,003 

(1) – theThe foreign currency adjustment represents the effects of the fluctuations between the South African rand and the Korean won, and the US dollar on the carrying value.

Goodwill has been allocated to the Company’s reportable segments as follows:

   As of  As of    
   September 30,  June 30,    
   2014  2014    
           
 South African transaction processing$26,808 $28,517    
 International transaction processing 123,993  128,427    
 Financial inclusion and applied technologies 28,202  29,632    
    Total$179,003 $186,576    
   As of  As of 
   December 31,  June 30, 
   2014  2014 
        
 South African transaction processing$26,011 $28,517 
 International transaction processing 118,689  128,427 
 Financial inclusion and applied technologies 27,537  29,632 
    Total$172,237 $186,576 

Intangible assets, net

Carrying value and amortization of intangible assets

  ��  Summarized below is the carrying value and accumulated amortization of the intangible assets as of September 30,December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014:

   As of September 30, 2014  As of June 30, 2014 
   Gross     Net  Gross     Net 
   carrying  Accumulated  carrying  carrying  Accumulated  carrying 
   value  amortization  value  value  amortization  value 
 Finite-lived intangible assets:                  
      Customer relationships$94,844 $(41,881)$52,963 $98,676 $(41,273)$57,403 
      Software and unpatented                  
      technology 32,271  (26,478) 5,793  33,604  (26,207) 7,397 
      FTS patent 3,402  (3,402) -  3,619  (3,619) - 
      Exclusive licenses 4,506  (4,506) -  4,506  (4,506) - 
      Trademarks 6,583  (3,191) 3,392  6,890  (3,176) 3,714 
      Total finite-lived intangible assets$141,606 $(79,458)$62,148 $147,295 $(78,781)$68,514 
   As of December 31, 2014  As of June 30, 2014 
   Gross     Net  Gross     Net 
   carrying  Accumulated  carrying  carrying  Accumulated  carrying 
   value  amortization  value  value  amortization  value 
 

Finite-lived intangible assets:

                  
      Customer relationships$90,966 $(42,445)$48,521 $98,676 $(41,273)$57,403 
      Software and unpatented                  
      technology 30,966  (26,706) 4,260  33,604  (26,207) 7,397 
      FTS patent 3,301  (3,301) -  3,619  (3,619) - 
      Exclusive licenses 4,506  (4,506) -  4,506  (4,506) - 
      Trademarks 6,334  (3,231) 3,103  6,890  (3,176) 3,714 
      Total finite-lived intangible assets$136,073 $(80,189)$55,884 $147,295 $(78,781)$68,514 

Aggregate amortization expense on the finite-lived intangible assets for the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, and 2013, was approximately $3.9 million and $3.7$7.7 million, respectively.respectively (three and six months ended December 31, 2013, was approximately $4.1 million and $7.8 million, respectively).

Future estimated annual amortization expense for the next five fiscal years and thereafter, assuming exchange rates prevailing on September 30,December 31, 2014, is presented in the table below. Actual amortization expense in future periods could differ from this estimate as a result of acquisitions, changes in useful lives, exchange rate fluctuations and other relevant factors.

2015$15,239 
2016 11,394 
2017 9,080 
2018 9,080 
2019 8,745 
Thereafter$12,146 
 2015$14,605  
 2016 10,920  
 2017 8,696  
 2018 8,696  
 2019 8,375  
 Thereafter$11,644  

12



7.

Reinsurance assets and policy holder liabilities under insurance and investment contracts

7. Reinsurance assets and policy holder liabilities under insurance and investment contracts

Reinsurance assets and policy holder liabilities under insurance contracts

Summarized below is the movement in reinsurance assets and policy holder liabilities under insurance contracts during the threesix months ended September 30,December 31, 2014:

  Reinsurance  Insurance 
  assets (1)  contracts (2) 
Balance as of June 30, 2014$21,062 $(21,478)
     Foreign currency adjustment(3) (1,263) 1,288 
         Balance as of September 30, 2014$19,799 $(20,190)
   Reinsurance  Insurance 
   assets (1)

 

 contracts (2)

 

 Balance as of June 30, 2014$21,062 $(21,478)
      Foreign currency adjustment(3) (1,851) 1,887 
          Balance as of December 31, 2014$19,211 $(19,591)

(1) Included in other long-term assets.
(2) Included in other long-term liabilities.
(3) The foreign currency adjustment represents the effects of the fluctuations between the ZAR against the US dollar.

The Company has agreements with reinsurance companies in order to limit its losses from large insurance contracts, however, if the reinsurer is unable to meet its obligations, the Company retains the liability.

The value of insurance contract liabilities is based on best estimates assumptions of future experience plus prescribed margins, as required in the markets in which these products are offered, namely South Africa. The process of deriving the best estimates assumptions plus prescribed margins includes assumptions related to future mortality and morbidity (an appropriate base table of standard mortality is chosen depending on the type of contract and class of business), withdrawals (based on recent withdrawal investigations and expected future trends), investment returns (based on government treasury rates adjusted by an applicable margin), expense inflation (based on a 10-year real return on CPI-linked government bonds from the risk-free rate and adding an allowance for salary inflation and book shrinkage of 1% per annum) and claim reporting delays (based on average industry experience).

Assets and policy holder liabilities under investment contracts

Summarized below is the movement in assets and policy holder liabilities under investment contracts during the threesix months ended September 30,December 31, 2014:

     Investment 
  Assets (1)  contracts (2) 
Balance as of June 30, 2014$688 $(688)
     Foreign currency adjustment(3) (41) 41 
         Balance as of September 30, 2014$647 $(647)
      Investment 
   Assets (1) contracts (2)
 Balance as of June 30, 2014$688 $(688)
      Foreign currency adjustment(3) (60) 60 
          Balance as of December 31, 2014$628 $(628)

(1) Included in other long-term assets.
(2) Included in other long-term liabilities.
(3) The foreign currency adjustment represents the effects of the fluctuations between the ZAR against the US dollar.

The Company does not offer any investment products with guarantees related to capital or returns.

8.

Short-term credit facility

8. Short-term credit facility

The Company’s short-term credit facilities are described in Note 12 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014.

South Africa

As of September 30,December 31, 2014, and June 30, 2014, the Company had not utilized any of its ZAR 250.0 million ($22.221.5 million, translated at exchange rates applicable as of September 30,December 31, 2014) overdraft facility. As of September 30,December 31, 2014, the interest rate on the overdraft facility was 8.10% . At September 30,December 31, 2014, the Company had utilized approximately ZAR 137.2 million ($12.211.8 million, translated at exchange rates applicable as of September 30,December 31, 2014) of its ZAR 150 million indirect and derivative facilities to obtain foreign exchange contracts from the bank and to enable the bank to issue guarantees, including stand-by letters of credit, in order for the Company to honor its obligations to third parties requiring such guarantees (refer to Note 17). As of June 30, 2014, the Company had utilized approximately ZAR 139.0 million ($13.1 million, translated at exchange rates applicable as of June 30, 2014) of its indirect and derivative facilities.

13



8.

8. Short-term credit facility (continued)

Korea

     Korea

The Company had not utilized any of its KRW 10 billion ($9.59.1 million, translated at exchange rates applicable as of September 30,December 31, 2014) overdraft facility as of September 30,December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014. As of September 30,December 31, 2014, the interest rate on the overdraft facility was 4.71%4.47% . The facility expiresexpired in January 2015.

9.

Long-term borrowings

9. Long-term borrowings

The Company’s Korean senior secured loan facility is described in Note 13 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014. The current carrying value as of September 30,December 31, 2014, is $75.6$59.7 million. As of September 30,December 31, 2014, the carrying amount of the long-term borrowings approximated fair value. The interest rate in effect on September 30,December 31, 2014, was 5.75%5.24% .

Interest expense incurred during the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, was $1.1$0.9 million and $1.4$1.8 million; and $2.0 million and $3.6 million, respectively. During each ofPrepaid facility fees amortized during the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively,was $0.1 million and $0.5 million; and $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively. Prepaid facility fees amortized during the Company amortizedthree and six months ended December 31, 2013, include the remaining prepaid facility fees related to the refinanced facility of approximately $0.1 million.$0.4 million that were expensed.

The first scheduled principal repayment of $14.3$14.1 million translatedwas paid on October 29, 2014. The next scheduled principal payment of $9.1 million (translated at exchange rates applicable as of September 30, 2014, was paidDecember 31, 2014) will be made on OctoberApril 29, 2014, and has been classified as current in the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet.2016.

10.

Capital structure

10. Capital structure

The following table presents reconciliation between the number of shares, net of treasury, presented in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity during the threesix months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and the number of shares, net of treasury, excluding non-vested equity shares that have not vested during the threesix months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively:

  2014  2013 
       
Number of shares, net of treasury:      
     Statement of changes in equity 46,475,623  45,780,513 
     Less: Non-vested equity shares that have not vested (Note 12) (453,333) (576,282)
             Number of shares, net of treasury excluding non-vested 
             equity shares that have not vested
 46,022,290  45,204,231 
   2014  2013 
        
 Number of shares, net of treasury:      
      Statement of changes in equity 46,547,153  45,773,342 
      Less: Non-vested equity shares that have not vested (Note 12) (524,863) (569,111)
          Number of shares, net of treasury excluding non-vested
         equity shares that have not vested
 46,022,29045,204,231 

Common stock repurchases and transaction with noncontrollingnon-controlling interests

The Company did not repurchase any of its shares during the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, under its share repurchase authorization. However, on August 27, 2014, the Company entered into a Subscription and Sale of Shares Agreement with Business Venture Investments No 1567 Proprietary Limited (RF) (“BVI”), one of the Company’s BEE partners, in preparation for any new potential SASSA tender. Pursuant to the agreement: (i) the Company repurchased BVI’s remaining 1,837,432 shares of the Company’s common stock for approximately ZAR 97.4 million in cash ($9.2 million translated at exchange rates prevailing as of August 27, 2014) and (ii) BVI has subscribed for new ordinary shares of Cash Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd (“CPS”) representing approximately 12.5% of CPS’ ordinary shares outstanding after the subscription for ZAR 15.0 million in cash (approximately $1.4 million translated at exchange rates prevailing as of August 27, 2014). In connection with transactions described above, the CPS shareholder agreement that was negotiated as part of the original December 2013 Relationship Agreement became effective.

Acquisition of KSNET non-controlling interests

During the three and six months ended December 31, 2013, the Company acquired substantially all of the issued share capital of KSNET, Inc. that it did not previously own for approximately $2.0 million in cash. After the acquisition of the additional shares, the Company owned 99.90% of KSNET. The Company purchased the remaining shares it did not own during the three months ended March 31, 2014. The transaction was accounted for as an equity transaction with a non-controlling interest and accordingly, no gain or loss was recognized in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. The carrying amount of the non-controlling interest was adjusted to reflect the change in ownership interest in KSNET. The difference between the fair value of the consideration paid and the amount by which the non-controlling interest was adjusted, of $1.5 million, was recognized in equity attributable to Net1.

14



11.

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

11. Accumulated other comprehensive loss

The table below presents the change in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income per component during the threesix months ended September 30,December 31, 2014:

 Three months ended
 September 30, 2014
  Accumulated 
  Net 
  unrealized 
 Accumulatedincome (loss) 
 Foreignon asset 
 currencyavailable for 
 translationsale, net of 
 reservetaxTotal
 ‘000‘000‘000
Balance as of June 30, 2014$(83,359)$$618 $(82,741)
     Movement in foreign currency translation reserve(21,159)-(21,159)
     Unrealized loss on asset available for sale, net of tax of $88 -  (226) (226)
             Balance as of September 30, 2014$(104,518)$392$(104,126)
      Six months ended    
      December 31, 2014    
      Accumulated    
      Net    
      unrealized    
   Accumulated  income (loss)    
   Foreign  on asset    
   currency  available for    
   translation  sale, net of    
   reserve  tax  Total 
           
 Balance as of June 30, 2014$(83,359)$618 $(82,741)
      Movement in foreign currency translation reserve (37,537) -  (37,537)
     Unrealized loss on asset available for sale, net of tax of $88 -  (226) (226)
              Balance as of December 31, 2014$(120,896)$392 $(120,504)

There were no reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss to comprehensive (loss) income during the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 or 2013, respectively.

12.

Stock-based compensation

12. Stock-based compensation

Stock option and restricted stock activity

Options

The following table summarizes stock option activity for the threesix months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013:

         Weighted     Weighted 
      Weighted  Average     Average 
      average  Remaining  Aggregate  Grant 
      exercise  Contractual  Intrinsic  Date Fair 
   Number of  price  Term  Value  Value 
   shares  ($)  (in years)  ($’000)  ($) 
                 
 Outstanding – June 30, 2014 2,710,392  14.16  5.38  3,909    
  Granted under Plan: August 2014 464,410  11.23  10.00  2,113  4.55 
  Exercised (688,633) 8.24     3,697    
      Outstanding – September 30, 2014 2,486,169  15.24  5.45  1,820   
                 
 Outstanding – June 30, 2013 2,648,583  15.15  5.98  313    
  Granted under Plan: August 2013 224,896  7.35  10.00  568  2.53 
      Outstanding – September 30, 2013 2,873,479  14.54  6.06  4,841   
         Weighted     Weighted 
      Weighted  Average     Average 
      average  Remaining  Aggregate  Grant 
      exercise  Contractual  Intrinsic  Date Fair 
   Number of  price  Term  Value  Value 
   shares  ($)  (in years)  ($’000) ($) 
                 
 Outstanding – June 30, 2014 2,710,392  14.16  5.38  3,909    
     Granted under Plan: August 2014 464,410  11.23  10.00  2,113  4.55 
      Exercised (688,633) 8.24     3,697    
         Outstanding – December 31, 2014 2,486,169  15.24  5.20  1,842   
                 
 Outstanding – June 30, 2013 2,648,583  15.15  5.98  313    
      Granted under Plan: August 2013 224,896  7.35  10.00  568  2.53 
         Outstanding – December 31, 2013 2,873,479  14.54  5.79  1,037   

The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Cox Ross Rubinstein binomial model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. The estimated expected volatility is calculated based on the Company’s 250 day volatility. The estimated expected life of the option was determined based on historical behavior of employees who were granted options with similar terms. The Company has estimated no forfeitures for options awarded in August 2013 and 2014, respectively.

15



12.

Stock-based compensation (continued)

12. Stock-based compensation (continued)

Stock option and restricted stock activity (continued)

Options (continued)

The table below presents the range of assumptions used to value options granted during the threesix months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013:

  Three months ended 
  September 30, 
  2014  2013 
Expected volatility 60%  50% 
Expected dividends 0%  0% 
Expected life (in years) 3  3 
Risk-free rate 1.0%  0.9% 
   Six months ended 
   December 31, 
   2014  2013 
 Expected volatility 60%  50% 
 Expected dividends 0%  0% 
 Expected life (in years) 3  3 
 Risk-free rate 1.0%  0.9% 

There were no forfeitures during the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013.

The following table presents stock options vested and expecting to vest as of September 30,December 31, 2014:

        Weighted    
     Weighted  Average    
     average  Remaining  Aggregate 
     exercise  Contractual  Intrinsic 
  Number of  price  Term  Value 
  shares  ($)  (in years)  ($’000) 
Vested and expecting to vest – September 30, 2014 2,486,169  15.24  5.45  1,820 
         Weighted    
      Weighted  Average    
      average  Remaining  Aggregate 
      exercise  Contractual  Intrinsic 
   Number of  price  Term  Value 
   shares  ($)  (in years)  ($’000)
 Vested and expecting to vest – December 31, 20142,486,16915.245.201,842

These options have an exercise price range of $7.35 to $24.46.

The following table presents stock options that are exercisable as of September 30,December 31, 2014:

        Weighted    
        Average    
     Weighted  Remaining  Aggregate 
     average  Contractual  Intrinsic 
  Number of  exercise  Term  Value 
  shares  price ($)  (in years)  ($’000) 
Exercisable – September 30, 2014 1,670,829  17.88  3.64  573 
         Weighted    
      Weighted  Average    
      average  Remaining  Aggregate 
      exercise  Contractual  Intrinsic 
   Number of  price  Term  Value 
   shares  ($)  (in years)  ($’000)
 Exercisable – December 31, 2014 1,728,163  17.55  3.51  775 

During the three months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, 273,63357,334 and 198,667159,666 stock options became exercisable. During the threesix months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, 330,967 and 358,333 stock options became exercisable. During the six months ended December 31, 2014, the Company received approximately $1.0 million from 116,395 stock options exercised. The remaining 572,238 stock options were exercised through recipients delivering 336,584 shares of the Company’s common stock to the Company on September 9, 2014, to settle the exercise price due. No stock options were exercised during the three months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, or during the three and six months ended December 31, 2013. The Company issues new shares to satisfy stock option exercises.

16



12.

Stock-based compensation (continued)

12. Stock-based compensation (continued)

Stock option and restricted stock activity (continued)

Restricted stock

The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the threesix months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013:

     Weighted 
  Number of  Average 
  Shares of  Grant Date 
  Restricted  Fair Value 
  Stock  ($’000) 
Non-vested – June 30, 2014 385,778  3,534 
 Granted – August 2014 141,707  581 
 Vested – August 2014 (74,152) 828 
     Non-vested – September 30, 2014 453,333  3,568 
       
Non-vested – June 30, 2013 405,226  4,393 
 Granted – August 2013 187,963  1,382 
 Vested – August 2013 (16,907) 161 
     Non-vested – September 30, 2013 576,282  5,630 
      Weighted 
   Number of  Average 
   Shares of  Grant Date 
   Restricted  Fair Value 
   Stock  ($’000)
 

Non-vested – June 30, 2014

 385,778  3,534 
 

 Granted – August 2014

 141,707  581 
 

 Granted – November 2014

 71,530  229 
 

 Vested – August 2014

 (74,152) 828 
 

     Non-vested – December 31, 2014

 524,863  3,795 
 

      
 

Non-vested – June 30, 2013

 405,226  4,393 
  Granted – August 2013 187,963  1,382 
  Vested – August 2013 (16,907) 161 
  Forfeitures – October 2013 (7,171) 161 
      Non-vested – December 31, 2013 569,111  5,572 

     Included in the 141,707The August 2014 grants comprise 127,626 and 14,081 shares of restricted stock granted areawarded to employees and non-employee directors, respectively. All of the November 2014 grants were awarded to employees. The 127,626 and 71,530 shares of restricted stock granted to employees on August 27, 2014, that will vest in full only on the date, if any, the following conditions are satisfied: (1) the closing price of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $19.41 (subject to appropriate adjustment for any stock split or stock dividend) for a period of 30 consecutive trading days during a measurement period commencing on the date that the Company files its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended 2017 and ending on December 31, 2017 and (2) the recipient is employed by the Company on a full-time basis when the condition in (1) is met. If either of these conditions is not satisfied, then none of the shares of restricted stock will vest and they will be forfeited. The $19.41 price target represents a 20% increase, compounded annually, in the price of the Company’s common stock on Nasdaq over the $11.23 closing price on August 27, 2014.

     TheseThe 127,626 and 71,530 shares of restricted stock are effectively forward starting knock-in barrier options with a strike price of zero. The fair value of these shares of restricted stock was calculated utilizing an adjusted Monte Carlo simulation discounted cash flow model which was developed for the purpose of the valuation of these shares. For each simulated share price path, the market share price condition was evaluated to determine whether or not the shares would vest under that simulation. The “adjustment” to the Monte Carlo simulation model incorporates a “jump diffusion” process to the standard Geometric Brownian Motion simulation, in order to capture the discontinuous share price jumps observed in the Company’s share price movements on stock exchanges on which it is listed. Therefore, the simulated share price paths capture the idiosyncrasies of the observed Company share price movements.

In scenarios where the shares do not vest, the final vested value at maturity is zero. In scenarios where vesting occurs, the final vested value on maturity is the share price on vesting date. The value of the grant is the average of the discounted vested values. The Company used an expected volatility of 76.01%, an expected life of approximately three years, a risk-free rate of 1.27% and no future dividends in its calculation of the fair value of the 127,626 shares of restricted stock. The estimatedCompany used an expected volatility of 63.73%, an expected life of approximately three years, a risk-free rate of 1.21% and no future dividends in its calculation of the fair value of the 71,530 shares of restricted stock. Estimated expected volatility was calculated based on the Company’s 30 day VWAP share price using the exponentially weighted moving average of returns.

The fair value of restricted stock vesting during the threesix months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, was $0.8 million and $0.2 million. The fair value of restricted stock is based on the closing price of the Company’s stock quoted on The Nasdaq Global Select Market on the date of grant.

17



12.

Stock-based compensation (continued)

12. Stock-based compensation (continued)

Stock-based compensation charge and unrecognized compensation cost

The Company has recorded a stock-based compensation charge of $0.9$1.0 million during each of the three months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which comprised:

      Allocated to cost    
      of goods sold, IT  Allocated to 
      processing,  selling, general 
   Total  servicing and  and 
   charge  support  administration 
 Three months ended September 30, 2014         
  Stock-based compensation charge$916 $- $916 
            Total – three months ended September 30, 2014$916 $- $916 
           
 Three months ended September 30, 2013         
  Stock-based compensation charge$930 $- $930 
            Total – three months ended September 30, 2013$930 $- $930 
      Allocated to cost    
      of goods sold, IT  Allocated to 
      processing,  selling, general 
   Total  servicing and  and 
   charge  support  administration 
 Three months ended December 31, 2014         
  Stock-based compensation charge$1,035 $- $1,035 
            Total – three months ended December 31, 2014 .$1,035 $- $1,035 
           
 Three months ended December 31, 2013         
  Stock-based compensation charge$974 $- $974 
  Reversal of stock compensation charge related to restricted stock forfeited (6) -  (6)
            Total – three months ended December 31, 2013 .$968 $- $968 

The Company has recorded a stock-based compensation charge of $2.0 million and $1.9 million, respectively, during the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, which comprised:

      Allocated to cost    
      of goods sold, IT  Allocated to 
      processing,  selling, general 
   Total  servicing and  and 
   charge  support  administration 
 

Six months ended December 31, 2014

         
 

 Stock-based compensation charge

$1,951 $- $1,951 
 

           Total –six months ended December 31, 2014

$1,951 $- $1,951 
 

         
 

Six months ended December 31, 2013

         
 

 Stock-based compensation charge

$1,904 $- $1,904 
 

 Reversal of stock compensation charge related to restricted stock forfeited

 (6) -  (6)
            Total –six months ended December 31, 2013$1,898 $- $1,898 

The stock-based compensation charges have been allocated to selling, general and administration based on the allocation of the cash compensation paid to the employees.

As of September 30,December 31, 2014, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options was approximately $2.8$2.4 million, which the Company expects to recognize over approximately three years. As of September 30,December 31, 2014, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards was approximately $2.2$1.8 million, which the Company expects to recognize over approximately two years.

As of each of September 30,December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014, respectively, the Company has recorded a deferred tax asset of approximately $1.2$1.3 million and $1.6 million related to the stock-based compensation charge recognized related to employees and directors of Net1 as it is able to deduct the grant date fair value for taxation purposes in the United States.

13.

Earnings per share

13. Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share include shares of restricted stock that meet the definition of a participating security because these shares are eligible to receive non-forfeitable dividend equivalents at the same rate as common stock. Basic earnings per share have been calculated using the two-class method and basic earnings per share for the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, reflects only undistributed earnings. The computation below of basic earnings per share excludes the net income attributable to shares of unvested restricted stock (participating non-vested restricted stock) from the numerator and excludes the dilutive impact of these unvested shares of restricted stock from the denominator.

18



13.

Earnings per share (continued)

Diluted earnings per share has been calculated to give effect to the number of shares of additional common stock that would have been outstanding if the potential dilutive instruments had been issued in each period. Stock options are included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share utilizing the treasury stock method and are not considered to be participating securities as the stock options do not contain non-forfeitable dividend rights. The calculation of diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of a portion of the restricted stock granted to employees in February 2012, August 2013 and August 2014 as these shares of restricted stock are considered contingently returnable shares for the purposes of the diluted earnings per share calculation and the vesting conditions in respect of a portion of the restricted stock had been satisfied. The vesting conditions are discussed in Note 18 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014.

18


13. Earnings per share (continued)

The following table presents net income attributable to Net1 (income from continuing operations) and the share data used in the basic and diluted earnings per share computations using the two-class method:

  Three months ended 
  September 30, 
  2014  2013 
  (in thousands except percent 
  and 
  per share data) 
Numerator:      
     Net income attributable to Net1$24,089 $11,596 
     Undistributed earnings 24,089  11,596 
     Percent allocated to common shareholders (Calculation 1) 99%  99% 
     Numerator for earnings per share: basic and diluted$23,847 $11,495 
       
Denominator:      
     Denominator for basic earnings per share: weighted-average common
     shares outstanding
 46,751  45,216 
     Effect of dilutive securities:      
             Stock options 109  71 
                     Denominator for diluted earnings per share: adjusted weighted 
                     average common shares outstanding and assumed conversion
 46,860  45,287 
       
Earnings per share:      
     Basic$0.51 $0.25 
     Diluted$0.51 $0.25 
       
(Calculation 1)      
     Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding (A) 46,751  45,216 
     Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding and unvested 
     restricted shares expected to vest (B)
 47,226  45,613 
     Percent allocated to common shareholders (A) / (B) 99%  99% 
   Three months ended  Six months ended 
   December 31,  December 31, 
   2014  2013  2014  2013 
   (in thousands except percent  (in thousands except percent 
   and  and 
   per share data)  per share data) 
 Numerator:            
      Net income attributable to Net1$22,374 $12,749 $46,463 $24,345 
      Undistributed earnings 22,374  12,749  46,463  24,345 
      Percent allocated to common shareholders
     (Calculation 1)
 99%  99%  99%  99% 
      Numerator for earnings per share: basic and diluted$22,102 $12,594 $45,947 $24,075 
              
 Denominator:            
      Denominator for basic earnings per share:            
      weighted-average common shares outstanding 45,953  45,221  46,352  45,218 
      Effect of dilutive securities:            
              Stock options 125  156  117  113 
                  Denominator for diluted earnings per 
                 share: adjusted weighted average 
                 common shares outstanding and
                 assumed conversion
 46,078  45,377  46,469  45,331 
              
 Earnings per share:            
      Basic$0.48 $0.28 $0.99 $0.53 
      Diluted$0.48 $0.28 $0.99 $0.53 
              
 

(Calculation 1)

            
      Basic weighted-average common shares
     outstanding (A)
 45,953  45,221  46,352  45,218 
      Basic weighted-average common shares
     outstanding and unvested restricted shares
     expected to vest (B)
 46,519  45,776  46,873  45,725 
      Percent allocated to common shareholders (A) / (B) 99%  99%  99%  99% 

Options to purchase 1,858,853 shares of the Company’s common stock at prices ranging from $11.23 to $24.46 per share were outstanding during the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise price were greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock. The options, which expire at various dates through August 27, 2024, were still outstanding as of September 30,December 31, 2014.

14. Supplemental cash flow information19



14.

Supplemental cash flow information

The following table presents supplemental cash flow disclosures for the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013:

  Three months ended 
  September 30, 
  2014  2013 
Cash received from interest$4,163 $3,241 
Cash paid for interest$1,218 $1,639 
Cash paid for income taxes$5,160 $498 
   Three months ended  Six months ended 
   December 31,  December 31, 
   2014  2013  2014  2013 
 Cash received from interest$3,577 $3,223 $7,740 $6,464 
 Cash paid for interest$1,195 $2,027 $2,413 $3,666 
 Cash paid for income taxes$20,393 $14,029 $25,553 $14,527 

The sale of the Company’s NUETS business is described in Note 19 to its audited consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014. The Company received cash sale proceeds of $1.9 million related to this transaction in July 2014.

As discussed in Note 12, during the threesix months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, employees exercised stock options through the delivery 336,584 shares of the Company’s common stock at the closing price on September 9, 2014 or $13.93 under the terms of their option agreements. These shares are included in the Company’s total share count and amount reflected as treasury shares on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30,December 31, 2014 and unaudited condensed consolidated statement of changes in equity for the threesix months ended September 30,December 31, 2014.

15.

Operating segments

19


15. Operating segments

The Company discloses segment information as reflected in the management information systems reports that its chief operating decision maker uses in making decisions and to report certain entity-wide disclosures about products and services, major customers, and the countries in which the entity holds material assets or reports material revenues. A description of the Company’s operating segments is contained in Note 23 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014.

The reconciliation of the reportable segments revenue to revenue from external customers for the three months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, is as follows:

     Revenue    
        From 
  Reportable  Inter-  external 
  Segment  segment  customers 
South African transaction processing$60,252 $5,121 $55,131 
International transaction processing 43,204  -  43,204 
Financial inclusion and applied technologies 65,197  7,091  58,106 
 Total for the three months ended September 30, 2014 168,653  12,212  156,441 
          
South African transaction processing 57,161  700  56,461 
International transaction processing 37,541  -  37,541 
Financial inclusion and applied technologies 36,796  7,304  29,492 
 Total for the three months ended September 30, 2013$131,498 $8,004 $123,494 
      Revenue    
         From 
   Reportable  Inter-  external 
   Segment  segment  customers 
 South African transaction processing$58,427 $5,437 $52,990 
 International transaction processing 40,466  -  40,466 
 Financial inclusion and applied technologies 67,531  6,856  60,675 
  Total for the three months ended December 31, 2014 166,424  12,293  154,131 
           
 South African transaction processing 58,754  2,280  56,474 
 International transaction processing 37,738  -  37,738 
 Financial inclusion and applied technologies 50,480  7,409  43,071 
  Total for the three months ended December 31, 2013$146,972 $9,689 $137,283 

The reconciliation of the reportable segments revenue to revenue from external customers for the six months ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, is as follows:

      Revenue    
         From 
   Reportable  Inter-  external 
   Segment  segment  customers 
 South African transaction processing$118,679 $10,558 $108,121 
 International transaction processing 83,670  -  83,670 
 Financial inclusion and applied technologies 132,728  13,947  118,781 
  Total for the six months ended December 31, 2014$335,077 $24,505 $310,572 

20



15.

Operating segments (continued)


   Revenue 
         From 
   Reportable  Inter-  external 
   Segment  segment  customers 
 South African transaction processing$115,915 $2,980 $112,935 
 International transaction processing 75,279  -  75,279 
 Financial inclusion and applied technologies 87,276  14,713  72,563 
  Total for the six months ended December 31, 2013$278,470 $17,693 $260,777 

The Company does not allocate interest income, interest expense or income tax expense to its reportable segments. The Company evaluates segment performance based on segment operating income before acquisition-related intangible asset amortization which represents operating income before acquisition-related intangible asset amortization and allocation of expenses allocated to Corporate/Eliminations, all under GAAP. The reconciliation of the reportable segments measure of profit or loss to income before income taxes for the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, is as follows:

  For the three months 
  ended September 30, 
  2014  2013 
Reportable segments measure of profit or loss$38,595 $24,820 
 Operating income: Corporate/Eliminations (5,470) (8,420)
 Interest income 4,090  3,319 
 Interest expense (1,312) (1,752)
     Income before income taxes$35,903 $17,967 
   Three months ended  Six months ended 
   December 31,  December 31, 
 

 2014  2013  2014  2013 
 

Reportable segments measure of profit or loss

$36,453 $25,532 $75,048 $50,352 
  Operating income: Corporate/Eliminations (5,638) (6,730) (11,108) (15,150)
  Interest income 3,587  3,236  7,677  6,555 
  Interest expense (1,107) (2,226) (2,419) (3,978)
      Income before income taxes$33,295 $19,812 $69,198 $37,779 

The following tables summarize segment information which is prepared in accordance with GAAP for the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013:

  For the three months 
  ended September 30, 
  2014  2013 
Revenues      
     South African transaction processing$60,252 $57,161 
     International transaction processing 43,204  37,541 
     Financial inclusion and applied technologies 65,197  36,796 
         Total 168,653  131,498 
Operating income (loss)      
     South African transaction processing 13,639  6,461 
     International transaction processing 7,349  5,524 
     Financial inclusion and applied technologies 17,607  12,835 
         Subtotal: Operating segments 38,595  24,820 
Corporate/Eliminations (5,470) (8,420)
Total$33,125 $16,400 
   Three months ended  Six months ended 
   December 31,  December 31, 
   2014  2013  2014  2013 
 

Revenues

            
 

     South African transaction processing

$58,427 $58,754 $118,679 $115,915 
 

     International transaction processing

 40,466  37,738  83,670  75,279 
 

     Financial inclusion and applied technologies

 67,531  50,480  132,728  87,276 
 

         Total

 166,424  146,972  335,077  278,470 
 

Operating income (loss)

            
 

     South African transaction processing

 12,883  7,128  26,522  13,589 
 

     International transaction processing

 5,743  5,139  13,092  10,663 
 

     Financial inclusion and applied technologies

 17,827  13,265  35,434  26,100 
 

          Subtotal: Operating segments

 36,453  25,532  75,048  50,352 
 

             Corporate/Eliminations

 (5,638) (6,730) (11,108) (15,150)
 

                 Total

 30,815  18,802  63,940  35,202 
 

 Depreciation and amortization

            
 

     South African transaction processing

 1,823  1,949  3,545  3,822 
 

     International transaction processing

 4,292  3,604  8,664  7,863 
 

     Financial inclusion and applied technologies

 203  174  382  323 
 

         Subtotal: Operating segments

 6,318  5,727  12,591  12,008 
 

            Corporate/Eliminations

 3,839  4,047  7,740  7,795 
 

                 Total

$10,157 $9,774 $20,331 $19,803 

2021



15.

Operating segments (continued)


   Three months ended  Six months ended 
   December 31,  December 31, 
   2014  2013  2014  2013 
 

Expenditures for long-lived assets

            
 

   South African transaction processing

$1,482 $2,044 $2,164 $2,600 
 

   International transaction processing

 7,279  4,685  15,606  9,516 
 

   Financial inclusion and applied technologies

 376  116  745  345 
 

     Subtotal: Operating segments

 9,137  6,845  18,515  12,461 
 

          Corporate/Eliminations

 -  -  -  - 
 

                   Total

$9,137 $6,845 $18,515 $12,461 

15. Operating segments (continued)

  For the three months 
  ended September 30, 
  2014  2013 
Depreciation and amortization      
   South African transaction processing$1,722 $1,873 
   International transaction processing 4,372  4,259 
   Financial inclusion and applied technologies 179  149 
Subtotal: Operating segments 6,273  6,281 
Corporate/Eliminations 3,901  3,748 
                   Total 10,174  10,029 
Expenditures for long-lived assets      
   South African transaction processing 682  556 
   International transaction processing 8,327  4,831 
   Financial inclusion and applied technologies 369  229 
Subtotal: Operating segments 9,378  5,616 
Corporate/Eliminations -  - 
                   Total$9,378 $5,616 

The segment information as reviewed by the chief operating decision maker does not include a measure of segment assets per segment as all of the significant assets are used in the operations of all, rather than any one, of the segments. The Company does not have dedicated assets assigned to a particular operating segment. Accordingly, it is not meaningful to attempt an arbitrary allocation and segment asset allocation is therefore not presented.

It is impractical to disclose revenues from external customers for each product and service or each group of similar products and services.

16.

Income tax

16. Income tax

Income tax in interim periods

For the purposes of interim financial reporting, the Company determines the appropriate income tax provision by first applying the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the full fiscal year to ordinary income. This amount is then adjusted for the tax effect of significant unusual or extraordinary items, for instance, changes in tax law, valuation allowances and non-deductible transaction-related expenses that are reported separately, and have an impact on the tax charge. The cumulative effect of any change in the enacted tax rate, if and when applicable, on the opening balance of deferred tax assets and liabilities is also included in the tax charge as a discrete event in the interim period in which the enactment date occurs.

For the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, the tax charge was calculated using the expected effective tax rate for the year. The Company’s effective tax rate for the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, was 32.4%30.6% and 31.6%, respectively, and was higher than the South African statutory rate primarily as a result of non-deductible expenses (including consulting and legal fees, interest expense related to the Company’s long-term Korean borrowings and stock-based compensation charges).

The Company’s effective tax rate for the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2013, was 36.1%35.8% and 35.9%, respectively, and was higher than the South African statutory rate primarily as a result of non-deductible expenses (including interest expense related to the Company’s long-term Korean borrowings and stock-based compensation charges).

Uncertain tax positions

There were no changes during the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014. As of September 30,December 31, 2014, the Company had accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions of approximately $0.2 million on its balance sheet.

The Company does not expect changes related to its unrecognized tax benefits will have a significant impact on its results of operations or financial position in the next 12 months.

As of September 30,December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014, respectively the Company has unrecognized tax benefits of $1.1 million and $1.2 million, all of which would impact the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company files income tax returns mainly in South Africa, South Korea, Austria, Botswana and in the US federal jurisdiction. As of September 30,December 31, 2014, the Company’s South African subsidiaries are no longer subject to income tax examination by the South African Revenue Service for periods before June 30, 2009.2010. The Company is subject to income tax in other jurisdictions outside South Africa, none of which are individually material to its financial position, statement of cash flows, or results of operations.

2122



17.

17. Commitments and contingencies

Guarantees

Guarantees

The South African Revenue Service and certain of the Company’s customers, suppliers and other business partners have asked the Company to provide them with guarantees, including standby letters of credit, issued by a South African bank. The Company is required to procure these guarantees for these third parties to operate its business.

Nedbank has issued guarantees to these third parties amounting to ZAR 135.0 million ($12.011.6 million, translated at exchange rates applicable as of September 30,December 31, 2014) and thereby utilizing part of the Company’s short-term facility. The Company in turn has provided nonrecourse, unsecured counter-guarantees to Nedbank for ZAR 125.0 million ($11.110.8 million, translated at exchange rates applicable as of September 30,December 31, 2014). The Company pays commission of between 0.2% per annum to 2.0% per annum of the face value of these guarantees and does not recover any of the commission from third parties.

The Company has not recognized any obligation related to these counter-guarantees in its consolidated balance sheet as of September 30,December 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014. The maximum potential amount that the Company could pay under these guarantees is ZAR 135.0 million ($12.011.6 million, translated at exchange rates applicable as of September 30,December 31, 2014). The guarantees have reduced the amount available for borrowings under the Company’s short-term credit facility described in Note 8.

Contingencies

Securities Litigation

On December 24, 2013, Net1, its chief executive officer and its chief financial officer were named as defendants inJanuary 16, 2015, the Company filed a purported class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging violations of the federal securities laws. The lawsuit was brought on behalf of a purported shareholder of Net1 and all other similarly situated shareholders who purchased Net1’s securities between August 27, 2009 and November 27, 2013. On July 23, 2014, the Court appointed a lead plaintiff and lead counsel. On September 22, 2014, the lead plaintiff filed anmotion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint alleging that Net1 made materially false and misleading statements in that it failedfor failure to disclose material adverse information and misrepresented the truth aboutstate a claim. Plaintiff has until March 6, 2015 to file an opposition to the Company’s finances and business prospects. The amended complaint seeks unspecified damages on behalf of the lead plaintiff and all other similarly situated shareholders who purchased Net1’s securities between January 18, 2012 and December 4, 2012, which is a shorter class period than proposed in the original complaint. No motion for class certification has been filed.motion. The Company believescontinues to believe this lawsuit has no merit and intends to defend it vigorously.

The Company is subject to a variety of insignificant claims and suits that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business.

Management currently believes that the resolution of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

18. Subsequent events

     As ordered by the South African Constitutional Court in its April 2014 ruling, SASSA has initiated a new tender process for a five-year contract relating to the payment of social grants. SASSA issued a request for proposals on October 22, 2014. Bidders are required to submit proposals by December 12, 2014. The Company cannot predict with certainty what the timing or ultimate outcome of the tender process will be, or if a new tender award will be made at all after the process is complete.

2223


     Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014, and the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes included in this Form 10-Q.

Forward-looking statements

     Some of the statements in this Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed, implied or inferred by these forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among other things, those listed under Item 1A.—“Risk Factors” and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014, and Item 1A—1A.—“Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.

     Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we do not know whether we can achieve positive future results, levels of activity, performance, or goals. Actual events or results may differ materially. We undertake no obligation to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Form 10-Q to conform those statements to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by applicable law.

     You should read this Form 10-Q and the documents that we reference herein and the documents we have filed as exhibits hereto and which we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission completely and with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and achievements may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

Recent Developments

Transactions in preparation for new SASSA tender

     On August 27, 2014, we entered into a Subscription and Sale of Shares Agreement with Business Venture Investments No 1567 Proprietary Limited (RF), or BVI, one of our BEE partners, in preparation for any new potential SASSA tender. Pursuant to the agreement: (i) we repurchased BVI’s remaining 1,837,432 shares of Net1 common stock for approximately ZAR 97.4 million in cash ($9.2 million translated at exchange rates prevailing as of August 27, 2014) and (ii) BVI has subscribed for new ordinary shares of Cash Paymaster Services (Pty) Ltd, or CPS, representing approximately 12.5% of CPS’ ordinary shares outstanding after the subscription for ZAR 15.0 million in cash (approximately $1.4 million translated at exchange rates prevailing as of August 27, 2014). In connection with transactions described above, the CPS shareholder agreement that was negotiated as part of the original December 2013 Relationship Agreement became effective.

Commencement of newNew SASSA tender process

     On October 10,As ordered by the South African Constitutional Court in its April 2014 ruling, SASSA announced the commencement ofhas initiated a new tender process in the South African Government Gazette by inviting proposalsfor a five-year contract for the provisionpayment of payment servicessocial grants. SASSA issued an initial request for social assistance benefits, or RFP. Accordingproposals (“RFP”) on October 22, 2014, which required bidders to information provided on the website www.sa-tenders.co.za, the following is applicable to this process:

     As reported on SASSA's website, the submission date was initially November 21,submit proposals by December 12, 2014. However, as per notices onfollowing a detailed analysis of the SASSA website,tender specifications, we concluded that the bid submission date has been extendedtender specifications were not sufficiently clear regarding a number of timescritical points and currentlyfailed to comply with the RFP requirements specified in the Court's order. We wrote a letter to SASSA, requesting that the RFP be withdrawn, corrected and reissued. SASSA declined our request. We then applied to the Court on November 6, 2014, for an order setting aside the RFP and directing SASSA to issue a corrected RFP. We initiated the request to SASSA, and subsequently to the Court, in order to ensure that there is no ambiguity in the tender specifications or conflict with the Court's April 2014 remedy order in an attempt to reduce the likelihood of another prolonged legal challenge should SASSA award a new tender. SASSA and AllPay (an unsuccessful bidder during the previous RFP and a party to the Court's April 2014 ruling) opposed our application.

     Following the submission date isof further affidavits and arguments to the Court, on December 12, 2014.5, 2014, the Court ordered SASSA to (1) extend the deadline for the submission of bids to February 27, 2015, (2) circulate and file with the Court a draft amended RFP by December 20, 2014 and (3) issue a bidder’s notice calling for bidders to furnish SASSA with objections or questions to the draft amended RFP by January 15, 2015. The Court also permitted litigating parties to file further affidavits or submissions by January 27, 2015.

     On December 8, 2014, SASSA extended the bid instructions statedeadline as ordered and on December 20, 2014, it issued a draft amended RFP. We analyzed the draft amended RFP in detail and believed that neither bidders nor their agents are allowedits specifications were still not sufficiently clear and that it still failed to circulate any news or press releases concerningcomply with the RFP orrequirements contained in the awardingCourt’s April 2014 order. We submitted a list of questions and objections to SASSA on January 15, 2015. SASSA replied to us on January 19, 2015. However, in our view, SASSA did not provide sufficient answers to our questions and objections and we therefore submitted a further affidavit to the Court on January 20, 2015, requesting the Court to set aside the RFP and to order SASSA to issue a new RFP that complies with the Court’s 2014 ruling. On the same day, SASSA and AllPay submitted affidavits asking the Court to dismiss our objections and to allow SASSA to proceed with the amended RFP. Also on January 20, 2015, SASSA issued a second amended RFP. On January 27, 2015, we made a further submission to the Court arguing that the second amended RFP remains vague and uncertain in several respect and non-compliant with the Court’s December 5, 2014 order. SASSA and AllPay have also made further submissions again asking the Court to dismiss our objections and to allow SASSA to proceed with the second amended RFP. We cannot predict when or any resulting agreements withouthow the written consent of, orCourt will rule on our application.

24


     We intend to participate in consultation with SASSA.the tender and to submit a bid. We cannot predict the timing of the tender process or what the outcome will be.

      See Part II, Item 1A.—“Risk Factors,” for additional details.

23


Critical Accounting Policies

     Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP, which requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty, the determination of estimates requires management’s judgment based on a variety of assumptions and other determinants such as historical experience, current and expected market conditions and certain scientific evaluation techniques.

     Critical accounting policies are those that reflect significant judgments or uncertainties, and potentially may result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. Management has identified the following critical accounting policies that are described in more detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014:

         Recent accounting pronouncements adopted

         Refer to Note 1 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements adopted, including the dates of adoption and the effects on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

        Recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as of September 30,December 31, 2014

        Refer to Note 1 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted as of September 30,December 31, 2014, including the expected dates of adoption and effects on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Currency Exchange Rate Information

         Actual exchange rates

      The actual exchange rates for and at the end of the periods presented were as follows:

Table 1 Three months ended  Year ended 
  September 30,  June 30, 
  2014  2013  2014 
ZAR : $ average exchange rate 10.7581  10.0015  10.3798 
Highest ZAR : $ rate during period 11.2641  10.4936  11.2579 
Lowest ZAR : $ rate during period 10.5128  9.5436  9.6259 
Rate at end of period 11.2641  10.1123  10.5887 
KRW : $ average exchange rate 1,027  1,113  1,068 
Highest KRW : $ rate during period 1,051  1,152  1,147 
Lowest KRW : $ rate during period 1,009  1,045  1,014 
Rate at end of period 1,051  1,083  1,014 

24


ZAR: US $ Exchange Rates

 Table 1

KRW: US $ Exchange Rates

  Three months ended  Six months ended  Year ended 
  December 31,  December 31,  June 30, 
  2014  2013  2014  2013  2014 
ZAR : $ average exchange rate 11.2236  10.1603  10.9909  10.0809  10.3798 
Highest ZAR : $ rate during period 11.6941  10.5730  11.6941  10.5730  11.2579 
Lowest ZAR : $ rate during period 10.8651  9.7143  10.5128  9.5436  9.6259 
Rate at end of period 11.6088  10.5037  11.6088  10.5037  10.5887 
                
KRW : $ average exchange rate 1,088  1,065  1,057  1,089  1,068 
Highest KRW : $ rate during period 1,122  1,077  1,122  1,152  1,147 
Lowest KRW : $ rate during period 1,048  1,031  1,009  1,031  1,014 
Rate at end of period 1,098  1,063  1,098  1,063  1,014 

25




26


Translation exchange rates for financial reporting purposes

     We are required to translate our results of operations from ZAR and KRW to US dollars on a monthly basis. Thus, the average rates used to translate this data for the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014 and 2013, vary slightly from the averages shown in the table above. The translation rates we use in presenting our results of operations are the rates shown in the following table:

Table 2

Table 2 Three months ended  Year ended 
 September 30,  June 30,  Three months ended  Six months ended  Year ended 
 2014  2013  2014  December 31,  December 31,  June 30, 
Income and expense items: $1 = ZAR . 10.7431  10.0001  10.3966 
 2014  2013  2014  2013  2014 
Income and expense items: $1 = ZAR 11.2066  10.1592  10.9688  10.0809  10.3966 
Income and expense items: $1 = KRW 1,029  1,141  1,049  1,051  1,021  1,036  1,087  1,049 
                        
Balance sheet items: $1 = ZAR 11.2641  10.1123  10.5887  11.6088  10.5037  11.6088  10.5037  10.5887 
Balance sheet items: $1 = KRW 1,051  1,083  1,014  1,098  1,063  1,098  1,063  1,014 

Results of operations

     The discussion of our consolidated overall results of operations is based on amounts as reflected in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements which are prepared in accordance with US GAAP. We analyze our results of operations both in US dollars, as presented in the consolidated financial statements, and supplementally in ZAR, because ZAR is the functional currency of the entities which contribute the majority of our profits and is the currency in which the majority of our transactions are initially incurred and measured. Due to the significant impact of currency fluctuations between the US dollar and ZAR on our reported results and because we use the US dollar as our reporting currency, we believe that the supplemental presentation of our results of operations in ZAR is useful to investors to understand the changes in the underlying trends of our business.

     Fiscal 2015 does not include MediKredit and the NUETS business and fiscal 2014 includes MediKredit and the NUETS business for the entire period.

     Our operating segment revenue presented in “—Results of operations by operating segment” represents total revenue per operating segment before inter-segment eliminations. A reconciliation between total operating segment revenue and revenue presented in our consolidated financial statements is included in Note 15 to those statements.

     We analyze our business and operations in terms of three inter-related but independent operating segments: (1) South African transaction processing, (2) International transaction processing and (3) Financial inclusion and applied technologies. In addition, corporate and corporate office activities that are impracticable to ascribe directly to any of the other operating segments, as well as any inter-segment eliminations, are included in corporate/eliminations.

     FirstSecond quarter of fiscal 2015 compared to firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2014

     The following factors had a significant influence on our results of operations during the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2015 as compared with the same period in the prior year:

2627


     Consolidated overall results of operations

     This discussion is based on the amounts which were prepared in accordance with US GAAP.

     The following tables show the changes in the items comprising our statements of operations, both in US dollars and in ZAR:

  In United States Dollars 
Table 3 (US GAAP) 
  Three months ended September 30, 
  2014  2013  $% 
  $’000  $’000  change 
Revenue 156,441  123,494  27% 
Cost of goods sold, IT processing, servicing and support 74,406  56,559  32% 
Selling, general and administration 38,736  40,506  (4%)
Depreciation and amortization 10,174  10,029  1% 
Operating income 33,125  16,400  102% 
Interest income 4,090  3,319  23% 
Interest expense 1,312  1,752  (25%)
Income before income tax expense 35,903  17,967  100% 
Income tax expense 11,648  6,485  80% 
Net income before earnings from equity-accounted investments 24,255  11,482  111% 
Earnings from equity-accounted investments 92  103  (11%)
Net income 24,347  11,585  110% 
Less (Add) net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest 258  (11) nm 
Net income attributable to us 24,089  11,596  108% 

  In South African Rand 
Table 4 (US GAAP) 
  Three months ended September 30, 
  2014  2013    
  ZAR  ZAR  ZAR % 
  ’000  ’000  change 
Revenue         
  1,680,661  1,234,965  36% 
Cost of goods sold, IT processing, servicing and support 799,351  565,601  41% 
Selling, general and administration 416,145  405,069  3% 
Depreciation and amortization 109,300  100,292  9% 
Operating income 355,865  164,003  117% 
Interest income 43,939  33,191  32% 
Interest expense 14,095  17,520  (20%)
Income before income tax expense 385,709  179,674  115% 
Income tax expense 125,136  64,851  93% 
Net income before earnings from equity-accounted investments 260,573  114,823  127% 
Earnings from equity-accounted investments 988  1,030  (4%)
Net income 261,561  115,853  126% 
Less (Add) net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest 2,772  (110) nm 
Net income attributable to us 258,789  115,963  123% 

Table 3

  In United States Dollars 
    (US GAAP)    
  Three months ended December 31, 
  2014  2013 $ % 
 $ ’000 $ ’000  change 
Revenue 154,131  137,283  12% 
Cost of goods sold, IT processing, servicing and support 71,774  67,883  6% 
Selling, general and administration 41,385  40,824  1% 
Depreciation and amortization 10,157  9,774  4% 
Operating income 30,815  18,802  64% 
Interest income 3,587  3,236  11% 
Interest expense 1,107  2,226  (50%)
Income before income tax expense 33,295  19,812  68% 
Income tax expense 10,203  7,099  44% 
Net income before earnings from equity-accounted investments 23,092  12,713  82% 
Earnings from equity-accounted investments 76  47  62% 
Net income 23,168  12,760  82% 
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest 794  11  nm 
Net income attributable to us 22,374  12,749  75% 

Table 4

  In South African Rand 
     (US GAAP)    
  Three months ended December 31, 
  2014  2013    
  ZAR  ZAR  ZAR % 
  ’000  ’000  change 
Revenue 1,727,284  1,394,685  24% 
Cost of goods sold, IT processing, servicing and support 804,342  689,636  17% 
Selling, general and administration 463,785  414,740  12% 
Depreciation and amortization 113,825  99,296  15% 
Operating income 345,332  191,013  81% 
Interest income 40,198  32,875  22% 
Interest expense 12,406  22,614  (45%)
Income before income tax expense 373,124  201,274  85% 
Income tax expense 114,341  72,120  59% 
Net income before earnings from equity-accounted investments 258,783  129,154  100% 
Earnings from equity-accounted investments 852  477  79% 
Net income 259,635  129,631  100% 
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest 8,898  112  nm 
Net income attributable to us 250,737  129,519  94% 

     The increase in revenue was primarily due to higher prepaid airtime sales, more low-margin transaction fees generated from beneficiaries using the South African National Payment System, an increase in the number of UEPS-based loans, an increase in the number of SASSA UEPS/ EMV cardholders paid and a higher contribution from KSNET.

     The increase in cost of goods sold, IT processing, servicing and support was primarily due to higher expenses incurred from increased usage of the South African National Payment System by beneficiaries and higher prepaid airtime.

     In ZAR, our selling, general and administration expense increased due to increases in goods and services purchased from third parties.

     Our operating income margin for second quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014 was 20% and 14%, respectively. We discuss the components of operating income margin under “—Results of operations by operating segment.” The increase is primarily attributable to higher volumes of transaction in South Africa, including prepaid airtime sales, lending and SASSA grants paid.

28


     Depreciation and amortization were higher primarily as a result of an increase in depreciation related to more terminals used to provide transaction processing in Korea, which was partially offset by no Eason intangible asset amortization as these intangible assets were fully amortized at the end of June 2014.

     Interest on surplus cash increased to $3.6 million (ZAR 40.2 million) from $3.2 million (ZAR 32.9 million), due primarily to higher average daily ZAR cash balances.

     Interest expense decreased to $1.1 million (ZAR 12.4 million) from $2.2 million (ZAR 22.6 million), due to a lower average long-term debt balance on our South Korean debt and a lower interest rate.

     Fiscal 2015 tax expense was $10.2 million (ZAR 114.3 million) compared to $7.1 million (ZAR 72.1 million) in fiscal 2014. Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2015, was 30.6% and was higher than the South African statutory rate as a result of non-deductible expenses (including consulting and legal fees, the interest expense related to our long-term South Korean borrowings and stock-based compensation charges). Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2014, was 35.8% and was higher than the South African statutory rate as a result of non-deductible expenses (including interest expense related to our long-term Korean borrowings and stock-based compensation charges).

      Results of operations by operating segment

      The composition of revenue and the contributions of our business activities to operating income are illustrated below

Table 5

     In United States Dollars (US GAAP)    
     Three months ended December 31,    
  2014  % of  2013  % of  % 
Operating Segment$ ’000  total $ ’000  total  change 
Revenue:               
South African transaction processing 58,427  38%  58,754  43%  (1%)
International transaction processing 40,466  26%  37,738  27%  7% 
Financial inclusion and applied technologies 67,531  44%  50,480  37%  34% 
       Subtotal: Operating segments 166,424  108%  146,972  107%  13% 
       Intersegment eliminations (12,293) (8%) (9,689) (7%) 27% 

           Consolidated revenue

 154,131  100%  137,283  100%  12% 
Operating income (loss):               
South African transaction processing 12,883  42%  7,128  38%  81% 
International transaction processing 5,743  19%  5,139  27%  12% 
Financial inclusion and applied technologies 17,827  58%  13,265  71%  34% 
       Subtotal: Operating segments 36,453  119%  25,532  136%  43% 
       Corporate/Eliminations (5,638) (19%) (6,730) (36%) (16%)
               Consolidated operating income 30,815  100%  18,802  100%  64% 

Table 6

     In South African Rand (US GAAP)    
     Three months ended December 31,    
  2014     2013       
  ZAR  % of  ZAR  % of  % 
Operating Segment ’000  total  ’000  total  change 
Revenue:               
South African transaction processing 654,768  38%  596,894  43%  10% 
International transaction processing 453,486  26%  383,388  27%  18% 
Financial inclusion and applied technologies 756,793  44%  512,836  37%  48% 
       Subtotal: Operating segments 1,865,047  108%  1,493,118  107%  25% 
       Intersegment eliminations (137,763) (8%) (98,433) (7%) 40% 

           Consolidated revenue

 1,727,284  100%  1,394,685  100%  24% 
Operating income (loss):               
South African transaction processing 144,375  42%  72,414  38%  99% 
International transaction processing 64,360  19%  52,208  27%  23% 
Financial inclusion and applied technologies 199,780  58%  134,762  71%  48% 
       Subtotal: Operating segments 408,515  119%  259,384  136%  57% 
       Corporate/Eliminations (63,183) (19%) (68,371) (36%) (8%)
               Consolidated operating income 345,332  100%  191,013  100%  81% 

29


     South African transaction processing

     In ZAR, the increase in segment revenues was primarily due to more low-margin transaction fees generated from beneficiaries using the South African National Payment System and more inter-segment transaction processing activities. In addition, revenue from the distribution of social welfare grants grew modestly during the year and was in-line with the increase in unique welfare cardholder recipients, net of removal of invalid and fraudulent beneficiaries, partially offset by the loss of MediKredit revenue as a result of the sale of that business.

     Our operating income margin for the second quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014 was 22% and 12%, respectively, and has increased primarily due to more higher-margin inter-segment transaction processing activities, the elimination of MediKredit losses and an increase in the number of beneficiaries paid in fiscal 2015.

     International transaction-based activities

     Revenue and operating income increased primarily due to higher transaction volume at KSNET during the second quarter of fiscal 2015. Operating income and margin for the second quarter of fiscal 2015, was negatively impacted by ad hoc incentives provided to staff due to the strong operating performance of KSNET during calendar 2014. Operating income margin for the segment is lower than for most of our South African transaction processing businesses. Operating income margin for each of the second quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014, was 14%

     Financial inclusion and applied technologies

     Financial inclusion and applied technologies revenue and operating income increased primarily due to higher prepaid airtime sales driven by the rollout of our prepaid airtime product, an increase in the number of UEPS-based loans as we rolled out our product nationally, and, in ZAR, an increase in intersegment revenues. Smart Life did not contribute to operating income in fiscal 2015 and 2014 due to the FSB suspension of its license.

     Operating income margin for the Financial inclusion and applied technologies segment was 26% during each of the second quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014, respectively.

     Corporate/ Eliminations

     Our corporate expenses generally include acquisition-related intangible asset amortization; expenditure related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; non-employee directors’ fees; employee and executive bonuses; stock-based compensation; legal fees; audit fees; directors and officers insurance premiums; telecommunications expenses; property-related expenditures including utilities, rental, security and maintenance; and elimination entries.

     The decrease in our corporate expenses was primarily due to lower US government investigations-related and US lawsuit expenses, audit fees and other corporate head office-related expenses.

     First half of fiscal 2015 compared to first half of fiscal 2014

     The following factors had a significant influence on our results of operations during the first half of fiscal 2015 as compared with the same period in the prior year:

30


     Consolidated overall results of operations

     This discussion is based on the amounts which were prepared in accordance with US GAAP.

     The following tables show the changes in the items comprising our statements of operations, both in US dollars and in ZAR:

Table 7

  In United States Dollars 
    (US GAAP)    
  Six months ended December 31, 
  2014  2013 $ % 
 $ ’000 $ ’000  change 
Revenue 310,572  260,777  19% 
Cost of goods sold, IT processing, servicing and support 146,180  124,442  17% 
Selling, general and administration 80,121  81,330  (1%)
Depreciation and amortization 20,331  19,803  3% 
Operating income 63,940  35,202  82% 
Interest income 7,677  6,555  17% 
Interest expense 2,419  3,978  (39%)
Income before income tax expense 69,198  37,779  83% 
Income tax expense 21,851  13,584  61% 
Net income before earnings from equity-accounted investments 47,347  24,195  96% 
Earnings from equity-accounted investments 168  150  12% 
Net income 47,515  24,345  95% 
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest 1,052  -  nm 
Net income attributable to us 46,463  24,345  91% 

Table 8

  In South African Rand 
    (US GAAP)    
  Six months ended December 31, 
  2014  2013    
  ZAR  ZAR  ZAR % 
  ’000  ’000  change 
Revenue 3,406,601  2,628,867  30% 
Cost of goods sold, IT processing, servicing and support 1,603,419  1,254,488  28% 
Selling, general and administration 878,830  819,880  7% 
Depreciation and amortization 223,006  199,633  12% 
Operating income 701,346  354,866  98% 
Interest income 84,207  66,080  27% 
Interest expense 26,534  40,102  (34%)
Income before income tax expense 759,019  380,844  99% 
Income tax expense 239,679  136,939  75% 
Net income before earnings from equity-accounted investments 519,340  243,905  113% 
Earnings from equity-accounted investments 1,843  1,512  22% 
Net income 521,183  245,417  112% 
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest 11,539  -  nm 
Net income attributable to us 509,644  245,417  108% 

     The increase in revenue was primarily due to higher prepaid airtime sales, more low-margin transaction fees generated from beneficiaries using the South African National Payment System, an increase in the number of UEPS-based loans, an increase in the number of SASSA UEPS/ EMV cardholders paid and a higher contribution from KSNET.

     The increase in cost of goods sold, IT processing, servicing and support was primarily due to higher expenses incurred from increased usage of the South African National Payment System by beneficiaries and higher prepaid airtime.

     In ZAR, our selling, general and administration expense increased due to increases in goods and services purchased from third parties.

     Our operating income margin for first quarterhalf of fiscal 2015 and 2014 was 21% and 13%, respectively. We discuss the components of operating income margin under “—Results of operations by operating segment.” The increase is primarily attributable to higher volumes of transaction in South Africa, including prepaid airtime sales, lending and SASSA grants paid.

2731


     In ZAR, depreciationDepreciation and amortization were higher primarily as a result of an increase in depreciation related to more terminals used to provide transaction processing in Korea, which was partially offset by no Eason intangible asset amortization as these intangible assets were fully amortized at the end of June 2014.

     Interest on surplus cash increased to $4.1$7.7 million (ZAR 43.984.2 million) from $3.3$6.6 million (ZAR 33.266.1 million), due primarily to higher average daily ZAR cash balances.

     Interest expense decreased to $1.3$2.4 million (ZAR 14.126.5 million) from $1.8$4.0 million (ZAR 17.540.1 million), due to a lower average long-term debt balance on our South Korean debt and a lower interest rate.

     Fiscal 2015 tax expense was $11.6$21.9 million (ZAR 125.1239.7 million) compared to $6.5$13.6 million (ZAR 64.9136.9 million) in fiscal 2014. Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2015, was 32.4%31.6% and was higher than the South African statutory rate as a result of non-deductible expenses (including consulting and legal fees, the interest expense related to our long-term South Korean borrowings and stock-based compensation charges). Our effective tax rate for fiscal 2014, was 36.1%35.9% and was higher than the South African statutory rate as a result of non-deductible expenses (including interest expense related to our long-term Korean borrowings and stock-based compensation charges).

        Results of operations by operating segment

        The composition of revenue and the contributions of our business activities to operating income are illustrated below

Table 9

Table 5 In United States Dollars (US GAAP) 
  Three months ended September 30, 
  2014  % of  2013  % of  % 
Operating Segment $’000  total  $’000  total  change 
Revenue:               
South African transaction processing 60,252  39%  57,161  46%  5% 
International transaction processing 43,204  28%  37,541  30%  15% 
Financial inclusion and applied technologies 65,197  42%  36,796  30%  77% 
       Subtotal: Operating segments 168,653  109%  131,498  106%  28% 
       Intersegment eliminations (12,212) (9%) (8,004) (6%) 53% 
               Consolidated revenue 156,441  100%  123,494  100%  27% 
Operating income (loss):               
South African transaction processing 13,639  41%  6,461  39%  111% 
International transaction processing 7,349  22%  5,524  34%  33% 
Financial inclusion and applied technologies 17,607  53%  12,835  78%  37% 
       Subtotal: Operating segments 38,595  116%  24,820  151%  55% 
       Corporate/Eliminations (5,470) (16%) (8,420) (51%) (35%)
               Consolidated operating income 33,125  100%  16,400  100%  102% 

Table 6 In South African Rand (US GAAP) 
 Three months ended September 30,     In United States Dollars (US GAAP)    
 2014     2013           Six months ended December 31,    
 ZAR  % of  ZAR  % of  %  2014  % of  2013  % of  % 
Operating Segment ’000  total  ’000  total  change $ ’000  total $ ’000  total  change 
Revenue:                              
South African transaction processing 647,293  39%  571,622  46%  13%  118,679  38%  115,915  44%  2% 
International transaction processing 464,145  28%  375,418  30%  24%  83,670  27%  75,279  29%  11% 
Financial inclusion and applied technologies 700,418  42%  367,967  30%  90%  132,728  43%  87,276  33%  52% 
Subtotal: Operating segments 1,811,856  109%  1,315,007  106%  38%  335,077  108%  278,470  106%  20% 
Intersegment eliminations (131,195) (9%) (80,042) (6%) 64%  (24,505) (8%) (17,693) (6%) 39% 
Consolidated revenue 1,680,661  100%  1,234,965  100%  36%  310,572  100%  260,777  100%  19% 
Operating income (loss):                              
South African transaction processing 146,525  41%  64,611  39%  127%  26,522  41%  13,589  39%  95% 
International transaction processing 78,951  22%  55,241  34%  43%  13,092  20%  10,663  30%  23% 
Financial inclusion and applied technologies 189,154  53%  128,353  78%  47%  35,434  55%  26,100  74%  36% 
Subtotal: Operating segments 414,630  116%  248,205  151%  67%  75,048  116%  50,352  143%  49% 
Corporate/Eliminations (58,765) (16%) (84,202) (51%) (30%) (11,108) (16%) (15,150) (43%) (27%)
Consolidated operating income 355,865  100%  164,003  100%  117%  63,940  100%  35,202  100%  82% 

28Table 10

     In South African Rand (US GAAP)    
     Six months ended December 31,    
  2014     2013       
  ZAR  % of  ZAR  % of  % 
Operating Segment ’000  total  ’000  total  change 
Revenue:               
South African transaction processing 1,301,766  38%  1,168,527  44%  11% 
International transaction processing 917,759  27%  758,880  29%  21% 
Financial inclusion and applied technologies 1,455,867  43%  879,821  33%  65% 
       Subtotal: Operating segments 3,675,392  108%  2,807,228  106%  31% 
       Intersegment eliminations (268,791) (8%) (178,361) (6%) 51% 

               Consolidated revenue

 3,406,601  100%  2,628,867  100%  30% 
Operating income (loss):               
South African transaction processing 290,915  41%  136,989  39%  112% 
International transaction processing 143,604  20%  107,492  30%  34% 
Financial inclusion and applied technologies 388,668  55%  263,111  74%  48% 
       Subtotal: Operating segments 823,187  116%  507,592  143%  62% 
       Corporate/Eliminations (121,841) (16%) (152,726) (43%) (20%)
               Consolidated operating income 701,346  100%  354,866  100%  98% 

32


     South African transaction processing

     In ZAR, the increase in segment revenues was primarily due to more low-margin transaction fees generated from beneficiaries using the South African National Payment System and more inter-segment transaction processing activities. In addition, revenue from the distribution of social welfare grants grew modestly during the year and was in-line with the increase in unique welfare cardholder recipients, net of removal of invalid and fraudulent beneficiaries, partially offset by the loss of MediKredit revenue as a result of the sale of that business.

     Our operating income margin for the first quarterhalf of fiscal 2015 and 2014 was 23%22% and 11%12%, respectively, and has increased primarily due to more higher-margin inter-segment transaction processing activities, the elimination of MediKredit losses and an increase in the number of beneficiaries paid in fiscal 2015.

     International transaction-based activities

     Revenue and operating income increased primarily due to higher transaction volume at KSNET during the first quarterhalf of fiscal 2015. Operating income margin for the segment is lower than for most of our South African transaction processing businesses. Operating income margin for the first quarterhalf of fiscal 2015 and 2014, was 17%16% and 15%14%, respectively.

     Financial inclusion and applied technologies

     Financial inclusion and applied technologies revenue and operating income increased primarily due to higher prepaid airtime sales driven by the rollout of our prepaid airtime product, an increase in the number of UEPS-based loans as we rolled out our product nationally, and, in ZAR, an increase in intersegment revenues, offset by lower ad hoc terminal and smart card sales.revenues. Fiscal 2014 operating income includes expenses related to the national roll-out of our UEPS-based lending offering and the establishment of the allowance for doubtful finance loans in fiscal 2014. Smart Life did not contribute to operating income in fiscal 2015 and 2014 due to the FSB suspension of its license.

     Notwithstanding the national roll-out expenses incurred in fiscal 2014, operating income margin for the Financial inclusion and applied technologies segment decreased to 27% from 35%30%, primarily as a result of more low-margin prepaid airtime and the sale of competitively-priced financial inclusion products to address the needs of the broader market.

     Corporate/ Eliminations

     Our corporate expenses generally include acquisition-related intangible asset amortization; expenditure related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002; non-employee directors’ fees; employee and executive bonuses; stock-based compensation; legal fees; audit fees; directors and officers insurance premiums; telecommunications expenses; property-related expenditures including utilities, rental, security and maintenance; and elimination entries.

     The decrease in our corporate expenses was primarily due to lower US government investigations-related and US lawsuit expenses, audit fees and other corporate head office-related expenses, which was partially offset by increases in acquisition-related intangible asset amortization.expenses.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     At September 30,December 31, 2014, our cash balances were $81.2$71.0 million, which comprised mainly ZAR-denominated balances of ZAR 612.0643.5 million ($54.355.4 million), KRW-denominated balances of KRW 20.610.7 billion ($19.69.7 million) and US dollar-denominated balances of $5.1$4.6 million and other currency deposits, primarily Botswana Pula, of $2.2$1.2 million. The increase in our cash balances from June 30, 2014, was primarily due to the expansion of our all of our core businesses, during the quarter, and to a lesser extent due to the cash conservation resulting from the sale of loss-incurring businesses.businesses, offset by provisional tax payments and the scheduled Korean debt repayment in October 2014.

     We currently believe that our cash and credit facilities are sufficient to fund our future operations for at least the next four quarters.

     We generally invest the surplus cash held by our South African operations in overnight call accounts that we maintain at South African banking institutions, and surplus cash held by our non-South African companies in the US money markets. We have invested surplus cash in Korea in short-term investment accounts at Korean banking institutions.

     Historically, we have financed most of our operations, research and development, working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions through our internally generated cash. When considering whether to borrow under our financing facilities, we consider the cost of capital, cost of financing, opportunity cost of utilizing surplus cash and availability of tax efficient structures to moderate financing costs.

2933


     We have a short-term South African credit facility with Nedbank Limited of ZAR 400 million ($35.534.5 million). The short-term facility comprises an overdraft facility of up to ZAR 250 million and indirect and derivative facilities of up to ZAR 150 million, which includes letters of guarantee, letters of credit and forward exchange contracts. As of September 30,December 31, 2014, we have used none of the overdraft and ZAR 135.0137.2 million ($12.011.8 million) of the indirect and derivative facilities to obtain foreign exchange contracts and to support guarantees issued by Nedbank to various third parties on our behalf. Refer to Note 12 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2014, for additional information related to our short-term facilities.

     As of September 30,December 31, 2014, we had outstanding long-term debt of KRW 79.465.5 billion (approximately $75.6$59.7 million translated at exchange rates applicable as of September 30,December 31, 2014) under credit facilities with a group of South Korean banks. The loans bear interest at the South Korean CD rate in effect from time to time (2.65%(2.14% as of September 30,December 31, 2014) plus a margin of 3.10% for one of the term loan facilities and the revolver and a margin of 2.90% for the other term loan facility. We repaid the KRW 15 billion other term loan facility in full in October 2014 in accordance with the repayment schedule. Scheduled remaining repayments of the term loans and loan under the revolving credit facility are as follows: October 2014 (KRW 15 billion), April 2016, 2017 and 2018 (KRW 10 billion each) and October 2018 (KRW 30 billion plus all outstanding loans under our revolving credit facility). Refer to Note 9 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and six months ended September 30,December 31, 2014, for additional information related to our long-term borrowings.

     Cash flows from operating activities

First          Second quarter of fiscal 2015

     Net cash provided by operating activities for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2015 was $39.5$14.6 million (ZAR 424.6163.7 million) compared to cash utilized in operating activities of $1.7$27.2 million (ZAR 16.8276.8 million) for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2014. Excluding the impact of interest received, interest paid under our Korean debt and taxes presented in the table below, the increase in cash from operating activities resulted from improved trading activity during fiscal 2015.

     During the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2015, we made additionalpaid South African tax payment of $2.4$18.8 million (ZAR 26.4215.7 million) related to our 20142015 tax year in South Africa.year. We also paid taxes totaling $1.6$1.9 million in other tax jurisdictions, primarily South Korea. There were no significant tax payments duringDuring the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2014.2014, we paid South African tax of $13.3 million (ZAR 137.8 million) related to our 2013 tax year and $0.2 million (ZAR 2.4 million) related to prior tax years. We also paid provisional Korean taxes of $0.5 million related to our tax year ended December 31, 2013.

     Taxes paid during the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

Table 7 Three months ended September 30, 
  2014  2013  2014  2013 
  $  $  ZAR  ZAR 
  ‘000  ‘000  ‘000  ‘000 
Taxation paid related to prior years 2,408  -  26,392  - 
Taxation refunds received (35) -  (365) - 
       Total South African taxes paid 2,374  -  26,027  - 
       Foreign taxes paid: primarily Korea 2,786  498  30,170  4,984 
               Total tax paid 5,160  498  56,197  4,984 

Table 11

     Three months ended December 31,    
  2014  2013  2014  2013 
 $  $   ZAR  ZAR 
  ‘000  ‘000  ‘000  ‘000 
First provisional payments 18,775  13,292  215,677  137,773 
Taxation paid related to prior years -  228  3  2,360 
Taxation refunds received (243) -  (2,700) - 
       Total South African taxes paid 18,532  13,520  212,980  140,133 
       Foreign taxes paid: primarily Korea 1,861  509  20,645  5,193 

               Total tax paid

 20,393  14,029  233,625  145,326 

          First half of fiscal 2015

     We expectNet cash provided by operating activities for the first half of fiscal 2015 was $54.1 million (ZAR 593.6 million) compared to paycash utilized in operating activities of $28.9 million (ZAR 291.6 million) for the first half of fiscal 2014. Excluding the impact of interest received, interest paid under our Korean debt and taxes presented in the table below, the increase in cash from operating activities resulted from improved trading activity during fiscal 2015.

     During the first provisional payments inhalf of fiscal 2014, we paid South AfricaAfrican tax of $18.8 million (ZAR 215.7 million) related to our 2015 tax year and $2.4 million (ZAR 26.4 million) related to prior tax years. We also paid taxes totaling $4.6 million in other tax jurisdictions, primarily South Korea. During the first half of fiscal 2014, we paid South African tax of $13.3 million (ZAR 137.8 million) related to our 2014 tax year and $0.2 million (ZAR 2.4 million) related to prior tax years. We also paid provisional Korean taxes of $1.0 million related to our tax year ended December 31, 2013.

34


     Taxes paid during the first half of fiscal 2015 and 2014 were as follows:

Table 12

     Six months ended December 31,    
  2014  2013  2014  2013 
 $  $   ZAR  ZAR 
  ‘000  ‘000  ‘000  ‘000 
First provisional payments 18,775  13,292  215,677  137,773 
Taxation paid related to prior years 2,408  228  26,395  2,360 
Taxation refunds received (277) -  (3,065) - 
       Total South African taxes paid 20,906  13,520  239,007  140,133 
       Foreign taxes paid: primarily Korea 4,647  1,007  50,815  10,177 

             Total tax paid

 25,553  14,527  289,822  150,310 

     Cash flows from investing activities

          Second quarter of fiscal 2015

     Cash used in investing activities for the second quarter of fiscal 2015.2015 includes capital expenditure of $9.1 million (ZAR 102.6 million), primarily for the acquisition of payment processing terminals in Korea.

     Cash flows fromused in investing activities

First for the second quarter of fiscal 2014 includes capital expenditure of $6.8 million (ZAR 69.5 million), primarily for the acquisition of payment processing terminals in Korea.

          First half of fiscal 2015

     Cash used in investing activities for the first quarterhalf of fiscal 2015 includes capital expenditure of $9.4$18.5 million (ZAR 100.9203.5 million), primarily for the acquisition of payment processing terminals in Korea. We also received approximately $1.9 million resulting from the sale of NUETS business.

     Cash used in investing activities for the first quarterhalf of fiscal 2014 includes capital expenditure of $5.6$12.5 million (ZAR 56.2125.6 million), primarily for the acquisition of payment processing terminals in Korea.

30


Cash flows from financing activities

First          Second quarter of fiscal 2015

     During the second quarter of fiscal 2015, we made a scheduled Korean debt repayment of $14.1 million utilizing available cash reserves. We also utilized approximately $1.1 million of our Korean borrowings to pay quarterly interest due.

     During the second quarter of fiscal 2014, we refinanced our Korean debt and received $85 million from Korean banks. We used $71.6 million of these new borrowings and $15.4 million of our surplus cash to repay the $87.0 million due under our old facility. In addition, we paid the facility fees related to our new Korean borrowings of approximately $0.9 million in October 2013. We also paid approximately $2.0 million for substantially all of the shares of KSNET we did not already own during the second quarter of fiscal 2014.

          First half of fiscal 2015

     During the first quarterhalf of fiscal 2015, we made a scheduled Korean debt repayment of $14.1 million, repurchased BVI’s remaining 1,837,432 shares of Net1 common stock for approximately $9.2 million and BVI paidreceived $1.4 million from BVI for 12.5% of CPS’ issued and outstanding ordinary shares. We also utilized approximately $1.1$2.2 million of our Korean borrowings to pay quarterly interest due and received approximately $1.0 million from the exercise of stock options during the first quarter of fiscal 2015.

     There wereWe had no cash flows from financing activities duringfor the first quarterhalf of fiscal 2014.2014, except as described above.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Capital Expenditures

     We expect capital spending for the secondthird quarter of fiscal 2015 to primarily include the acquisition of payment terminals for the expansion of our operations in Korea.

35


     Our historical capital expenditures for the firstsecond quarter of fiscal 2015 and 2014 are discussed under “—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Cash flows from investing activities.” All of our capital expenditures for the past three fiscal years were funded through internally-generated funds. We had outstanding capital commitments as of September 30,December 31, 2014, of $0.3 million related mainly to computer equipment. We expect to fund these expenditures through internally-generated funds.

Contingent Liabilities, Commitments and Contractual Obligations

     The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of September 30,December 31, 2014:

Table 13

Table 8 Payments due by Period, as of September 30, 2014(in $ ’000s) 
 Payments due by Period, as of December 31, 2014 (in $ ’000s)  
    Less        More     Less        More 
    than 1  1-3  3-5  than 5     than 1  1-3  3-5  than 5 
 Total  year  years  years  years  Total  year  years  years  years 
Long-term debt obligations (A) 83,935  17,753  24,847  41,335  -  71,091  3,152  24,131  43,808  - 
Operating lease obligations 6,913  3,330  3,426  157  -  8,753  4,165  4,205  383  - 
Purchase obligations 9,090  9,090  -  -  -  10,788  10,788  -  -  - 
Capital commitments 304  304  -  -  -  270  270  -  -  - 
Other long-term obligations (B)(C) 22,396  -  -  -  22,396  20,831  -  -  -  20,831 
Total 122,638  30,477  28,273  41,492  22,396  111,733  18,375  28,336  44,191  20,831 

(A) – Includes $59.7 million of long-term debt and interest payable at the rate applicable on December 31, 2014, under our Korean debt facility.
(A)

– Includes $75.6 million of long-term debt and interest payable at the rate applicable on September 30, 2014, under our Korean debt facility.

(B)

– Includes policy holder liabilities of $20.8 million related to our insurance business.

(C)

– We have excluded cross-guarantees in the aggregate amount of $12.0 million issued as of September 30,(B) – Includes policy holder liabilities of $20.2 million related to our insurance business.
(C) – We have excluded cross-guarantees in the aggregate amount of $12.0 million issued as of December 31, 2014, to Nedbank to secure guarantees it has issued to third parties on our behalf as the amounts that will be settled in cash are not known and the timing of any payments is uncertain.

3136


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     In addition to the tables below, see Note 5 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of market risk.

     The following table illustrates the effect on our annual expected interest charge, translated at exchange rates applicable as of September 30,December 31, 2014, as a result of changes in the Korean CD. The effect of a hypothetical 1% (i.e. 100 basis points) increase and a 1% decrease in each of the Korean CD rate as of September 30,December 31, 2014, are shown. The selected 1% hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worst case scenarios.

  As of September 30, 2014    
Table 9    Hypothetical  Estimated annual    
     change in  expected interest    
     Korean CD  charge after    
     rate or South  hypothetical change in    
  Annual  Africa  Korean CD rate or    
  expected  overdraft  South African    
  interest  facility rate,  overdraft facility rate,    
  charge  as  as appropriate    
  ($ ’000)  appropriate  ($ ’000)   
Interest on Korean long-term debt 4,316  1%  5,080    
     (1%) 3,569    

Table 14

  As of December 31, 2014 
    Hypothetical  Estimated annual 
     change in  expected interest 
     Korean CD  charge after 
     rate or South  hypothetical change in 
  Annual  Africa  Korean CD rate or 
  expected  overdraft  South African 
  interest  facility rate,  overdraft facility rate, 
  charge  as  as appropriate 
  ($ ’000) appropriate  ($ ’000)
Interest on Korean long-term debt 3,128  1%  3,725 
     (1%) 2,531 

      The following table summarizes our exchange-traded equity securities with equity price risk as of September 30,December 31, 2014. The effects of a hypothetical 10% increase and a 10% decrease in market prices as of September 30,December 31, 2014, is also shown. The selected 10% hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worst case scenarios. Indeed, results could be far worse due both to the nature of equity markets and the aforementioned liquidity risk.

  As of September 30, 2014 
Table 10            
           Hypothetical 
        Estimated fair  Percentage 
        value after  Increase 
  Fair     hypothetical  (Decrease) in 
  value  Hypothetical  change in price  Shareholders’ 
  ($ ’000) price change  ($ ’000) Equity 
Exchange-traded equity securities 7,584  10%  8,342  0.17% 
  7,584  (10%) 6,826  (0.17%)

Table 15

     As of December 31, 2014    
             
           Hypothetical 
        Estimated fair  Percentage 
        value after  Increase 
  Fair     hypothetical  (Decrease) in 
  value  Hypothetical  change in price  Shareholders’ 
  ($ ’000) price change  ($ ’000) Equity 
Exchange-traded equity securities 7,358  10%  8,094  0.16% 
     (10%) 6,622  (0.16%)

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

     Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of September 30,December 31, 2014. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30,December 31, 2014.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

     There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended September 30,December 31, 2014, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

3237


Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

United States securities litigation

     On December 24, 2013, Net1, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer were named as defendants inJanuary 16, 2015, we filed a purported class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging violations of the federal securities laws. The lawsuit was brought on behalf of a purported shareholder of Net1 and all other similarly situated shareholders who purchased our securities between August 27, 2009 and November 27, 2013. On July 23, 2014, the Court appointed a lead plaintiff and lead counsel. On September 22, 2014, the lead plaintiff filed anmotion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint alleging that we made materially false and misleading statements in that we failedfor failure to disclose material adverse information and misrepresented the truth aboutstate a claim. Plaintiff has until March 6, 2015 to file an opposition to our finances and business prospects. The amended complaint seeks unspecified damages on behalf of the lead plaintiff and all other similarly situated shareholders who purchased our securities between January 18, 2012 and December 4, 2012, which is a shorter class period than proposed in the original complaint. No motion for class certification has been filed.motion. We continue to believe this lawsuit has no merit and intend to defendare defending it vigorously.

     Application to Constitutional Court

     See disclosure under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” regarding the application we made to the Constitutional Court in connection with the new SASSA tender process.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

     See “Item 1A RISK FACTORS” in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, for a discussion of risk factors relating to (i) our business, (ii) operating in South Africa and other foreign markets, (iii) government regulation, and (iv) our common stock. Except as set forth below and in “Item 1A RISK FACTORS in Part II of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, there have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.

     SASSA has initiated a new tender process for the payment of social grants. As a result, we cannot predict whether our current SASSA contract will remain in effect for the remainder of its five-year term. We derive a substantial portion of our revenues from this contract and from the provision of financial and other services to our cardholder base. If we were to lose our SASSA contract or we were to obtain a new contract on terms that are substantially inferior to our current contract, our business would suffer significantly.

     As ordered by the South African Constitutional Court in its April 2014 ruling, SASSA has initiated a new tender process for a five-year contract relating to the payment of social grants. SASSA issued a request for proposalsan initial RFP on October 22, 2014. Bidders are2014, which required bidders to submit proposals by December 12, 2014. As discussed above in more detail under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Developments—New SASSA Tender Process,” we identified ambiguities and other deficiencies in the tender specifications and applied to the Court for an order setting aside the RFP and directing SASSA to issue a corrected RFP. Although the Court did not set aside the RFP, on December 5, 2014, it did order SASSA to extend the bid deadline to February 27, 2015 and to issue a draft amended RFP. Since that ruling, SASSA has issued amended RFPs on two separate occasions, and we have continued to object to the RFP, as amended, on the grounds that it remains vague and uncertain in several respects and that it does not comply with the Court’s rulings. SASSA and AllPay have asked the Court to dismiss our objections and to allow SASSA to proceed with the amended RFP.

     We cannot predict with certaintywhen or how the Court will rule on our application for withdrawal of the amended RFP, what the timing or ultimate outcome of the tender process will be, or if a new tender award will be made at all after the process is complete. We intend to participate in the new tender, which, as with prior SASSA tenders, will continue to consume a substantial amount of our management’s time and attention and will impact their ability to focus on other matters, including other South African and international business development activities. We cannot assure you that the current tender process will result in our receiving a contract to continue to distribute social welfare grants nationally. If a new contract is awarded and we are not the winning bidder, we would lose the benefit of the remaining portion of our current contract. Even if we win the tender and do receive a new contract, we cannot predict the terms that such contract will contain. Any new contract we receive may contain pricing or other terms that would be less favorable to us than the terms of our current contract.

     In addition to the revenue generated by CPS from our SASSA contract has enabled us to offerwe also earn revenue from a variety of innovative financial and other services, such as provision of UEPS-based loans and procurementsale of prepaid airtime to ourcustomers, including, at their election, certain social welfare recipient cardholders. Although we believe that our offerings frequently represent the lowest-cost alternative for our customers for these types of services, if we were to lose our SASSA contract or if our SASSA contract were to limit the provision of these services, it might be less convenient for our cardholder customers to purchase these services from us and thus, we may have difficulty growing or even maintaining this aspect of our South African business, which would negatively affect our future operating performance.

38


     Further, in connection with the litigation challenging the award of the previous SASSA tender to us, we included our entire 2011 SASSA tender submission in the court record, which court record is in the public domain. Our previous tender submission contained competitively sensitive business information. As a result of this disclosure, our existing and future competitors have access to this information which could adversely affect our competitive position in the current tender process to the extent that such information continues to remain competitively sensitive.

     Finally, if we were to be awarded one or more contracts by SASSA, an unsuccessful tenderor could seek to challenge the award, which could result in the contract being set aside or could require us to expend time and resources in an attempt to defeat any such challenge.

33


The South African National Credit Regulator has applied to cancel the registration of our subsidiary, Moneyline Financial Services (Pty) Ltd, as a credit provider. If the registration is cancelled, we will not be able to provide UEPS-based loans to our customers, which would harm our business.

     Moneyline provides microloans to our UEPS/EMV cardholders. Moneyline is a registered credit provider under the South African National Credit Act, or NCA, and is required to comply with the NCA in the operation of its lending business. On September 22, 2014, the South African National Credit Regulator, or NCR, issued a press release stating that it has applied to the National Consumer Tribunal to cancel Moneyline’s registration, based on an investigation concluded by the NCR. The NCR's press release alleges, among other things, that Moneyline contravened the NCA by including child support grants and foster child grants in the affordability assessments performed by Moneyline prior to granting credit to these borrowers, and that the procedures followed and documentation maintained by Moneyline are not in accordance with the NCA. We have reviewed NCR’s application and believe that it contains numerous factual inaccuracies. We believe that Moneyline has conducted its business in compliance with NCA. However, if the NCR’s application is successful, Moneyline would be prohibited from operating its microlending business, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

     As described in further detail under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Recent Developments—Transactions in Preparation for New SASSA Tender,” on August 27, 2014, we repurchased 1,837,432 shares of our common stock from one of our BEE partners at a price of ZAR 52.99 per share.

Item 6. Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Form 10-Q:

   Incorporated by Reference Herein
Exhibit Included   
No.Description of ExhibitHerewithForm Exhibit ExhibitFiling Date
10.29Subscription and Sale of Shares Agreement dated August 27, 2014, between Net 1 UEPS Technologies, Inc., Net 1 Applied Technologies South Africa (Proprietary) Limited, Business Venture Investments No 1567 (Proprietary) Limited (RF), Mosomo Investment Holdings (Proprietary) Limited and Cash Paymaster Services (Proprietary) LtdX
31.1Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange ActX  
31.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Exchange ActX  
32Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350X   
101.INSXBRL Instance DocumentX   
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension SchemaX   
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation LinkbaseX
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition LinkbaseX
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label LinkbaseX   
101.PRE101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition LinkbaseX 
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label LinkbaseX
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation LinkbaseX X 

34


SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on November 6, 2014.February 5, 2015.

NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
By: /s/ Dr. Serge C.P. Belamant
Dr. Serge C.P. Belamant
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and Director
By: /s/ Herman Gideon Kotzé
Herman Gideon Kotzé
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, Director

NET 1 UEPS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

By: /s/ Dr. Serge C.P. Belamant

Dr. Serge C.P. Belamant
Chief Executive Officer, Chairman of the Board and Director

By: /s/ Herman Gideon Kotzé

Herman Gideon Kotzé
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary, Director

3539