UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018



o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 1-14287

Centrus Energy Corp.



Delaware	52-2107911
(State of incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6901 Rockledge Drive, Suite 800, Bethesda, Maryland 20817

(301) 564-3200

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically, ~~and posted on its corporate Web site,~~ if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	ý
Accelerated filer	o	Emerging growth company	o
Non-accelerated filer	o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes ý No o

As of November 1, ~~2017,~~2018, there were 7,632,669 shares of the registrant’s Class A Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, and 1,406,082 shares of the registrant’s Class B Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS



		Page
	PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited):
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016~~2017	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017	7
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017	8
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	9
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25
	~~Liquidity and Capital Resources~~	3528
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3943

	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	4044
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4044
Item 6.	Exhibits	4044
Signatures		4145

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part I, Item 2, contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) - that is, statements related to future events. In this context, forward-looking statements may address our expected future business and financial performance, and often contain words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “would” or “may” and other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements by their nature address matters that are, to different degrees, uncertain. For Centrus Energy Corp., particular risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements include ~~risks~~risks: related to our significant long-term liabilities, including material unfunded defined benefit pension plan obligations and postretirement health and life benefit obligations; risks relating to our outstanding 8.0% paid-in-kind (“PIK”) toggle notes (the “8% PIK Toggle Notes”) maturing in September 2019, our 8.25% notes (the “8.25% Notes”) maturing in February 2027 ~~(the “8.25% Notes”)~~ and our Series B Senior Preferred Stock, ~~(the “Series B Preferred Stock”),~~ including the potential termination of the guarantee by our principal subsidiary United States Enrichment Corporation ~~(“Enrichment Corp.”)~~ of the 8% PIK Toggle Notes; risks related to the limited trading markets in our securities; risks related to our ability to maintain the listing of our Class A Common Stock on the NYSE American LLC; risks related to decisions made by our Class B stockholders regarding their investment in the Company based upon factors that are unrelated to the Company’s performance; risks related to the use of our net operating losses (“NOLs”) and net unrealized built-in losses (“NUBILs”) to offset future taxable income and the use of the Rights Agreement (as defined herein) to prevent an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and our ability to generate taxable income to utilize all or a portion of the NOLs and NUBILs prior to the expiration thereof; risks related to the limited trading markets in our securities; risks related to our ability to maintain the listing of our Class A Common Stock on the NYSE American LLC (the “NYSE American”); risks related to decisions made by our Class B stockholders regarding their investment in the Company based upon factors that are unrelated to the Company’s performance; the continued impact of the March 2011 earthquake and tsunami in Japan on the nuclear industry and on our business, results of operations and prospects; the impact and potential extended duration of the current supply/demand imbalance in the market for low-enriched uranium (“LEU”);our dependence on others fordeliveries of LEU including deliveries from the Russian government entity Joint Stock Company “TENEX” (“TENEX”) under a commercial supply agreement with TENEX and deliveries under a long-term supply agreement with Orano

~~TENEX (the “Russian Supply Agreement”);~~Cycle; risks related to our ability to sell the LEU we procure pursuant to our purchase obligations under our supply ~~agreements, including the Russian Supply Agreement;~~agreements; risks relating to our sales order book, including uncertainty concerning customer actions under current contracts and in future contracting due to market conditions and lack of current production capability; risks related to financial difficulties experienced by customers, including possible bankruptcies, insolvencies or any other inability to pay for our products or services; pricing trends and demand in the uranium and enrichment markets and their impact on our profitability; movement and timing of customer orders; risks related to the value of our intangible assets related to the sales order book and customer relationships; risks associated with our reliance on third-party suppliers to provide essential services to us; ~~pricing trends and demand in the uranium and enrichment markets and their impact on our profitability; movement and timing of customer orders;~~ risks related to existing or new trade barriers and contract terms that limit our ability to deliver LEU to customers; risks related to actions that may be taken by the U.S. government, the Russian government or other governments that could affect our ability to perform or the ability of our sources of supply to perform under their contract obligations to us, including the imposition of sanctions, restrictions or other requirements; the impact of government regulation including by the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission; uncertainty regarding our ability to commercially deploy competitive enrichment technology; risks and uncertainties regarding funding for the American Centrifuge project and our ability to obtain and/or perform under our ~~agreement~~future agreements with UT-Battelle, LLC (“UT-Battelle”), the management and operating contractor for Oak Ridge National Laboratory (“ORNL”), for continued research and development of the American Centrifuge technology; the potential for further demobilization or termination of the American Centrifuge project; risks related to the current demobilization of portions of the American Centrifuge project, including risks that the schedule could be delayed and costs could be higher than expected; failures or security breaches of our information technology systems; potential strategic transactions, which could be difficult to implement, disrupt our business or change our business profile significantly; the outcome of legal proceedings and other contingencies (including lawsuits and government investigations or audits); thecompetitive environment for our products and services; changes in the nuclear energy industry; the impact of financial market conditions on our business, liquidity, prospects, pension assets and insurance facilities; revenue and operating results can fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter, and in some cases, year to year; and other risks and uncertainties discussed in this and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including under Part 1. Item1A - “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

These factors may not constitute all factors that could cause actual results to differ from those discussed in any forward-looking statement. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should be not be relied upon as a predictor of actual results. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made in this report and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission that attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business. We do not undertake to update our forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that may arise after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, except as required by law.

CENTRUS ENERGY CORP.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS ~~(Unaudited)~~

(Unaudited; in millions, except share and per share data)


	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
ASSETS
Current assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	135.9		$	260.7		$	124.9		$	208.8
Accounts receivable	14.2			19.9			2.5			60.2
Inventories	124.1			177.4			129.4			153.1
Deferred costs associated with deferred revenue	94.5			89.3			122.7			122.3
Deposits for financial assurance							30.2			16.3
Other current assets	15.6			13.3			6.9			6.2
Total current assets	384.3			560.6			416.6			566.9
Property, plant and equipment, net	5.2			6.0
Deposits for surety bonds	29.6			29.5
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $1.5 as of September 30, 2018 and $1.9 as of December 31, 2017							4.4			4.9
Deposits for financial assurance							6.2			19.7
Intangible assets, net	87.6			93.3			78.1			82.7
Other long-term assets	15.2			24.1			0.7			1.1
Total assets	$	521.9		$	713.5		$	506.0		$	675.3

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Current liabilities
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	50.7		$	46.4		$	46.9		$	48.2
Payables under SWU purchase agreements	17.3			59.6			14.6			79.4
Inventories owed to customers and suppliers	22.1			57.5			70.2			77.9
Deferred revenue	131.7			123.6
Decontamination and decommissioning obligations	16.6			38.6
Deferred revenue and advances from customers							175.6			191.8
Current debt							39.1			6.1
Total current liabilities	238.4			325.7			346.4			403.4
Long-term debt	157.5			234.1			120.2			157.5
Postretirement health and life benefit obligations	170.0			171.3			150.9			154.2
Pension benefit liabilities	175.0			179.9			143.5			161.6
Advances from customers							14.5			—
Other long-term liabilities	35.6			38.6			8.0			17.5
Total liabilities	776.5			949.6			783.5			894.2
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
Stockholders’ deficit
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Stockholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share, 20,000,000 shares authorized
Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock, none issued	—			—			—			—
Series B Senior Preferred Stock, 7.5% cumulative, 104,574 shares issued and outstanding and an aggregate liquidation preference of $109.6 million as of September 30, 2017	4.6			—
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, 70,000,000 shares authorized, 7,632,669 and 7,563,600 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016	0.8			0.8
Class B Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized, 1,406,082 and 1,436,400 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016	0.1			0.1
Series B Senior Preferred Stock, 7.5% cumulative, 104,574 shares issued and outstanding and an aggregate liquidation preference of $117.4 as of September 30, 2018 and $111.5 as of December 31, 2017							4.6			4.6
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, 70,000,000 shares authorized, 7,632,669 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017							0.8			0.8
Class B Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share, 30,000,000 shares authorized, 1,406,082 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017							0.1			0.1
Excess of capital over par value	59.8			59.5			60.3			60.0
Accumulated deficit	(320.0		)	(296.7		)	(343.3		)	(284.5		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax	0.1			0.2			—			0.1
Total stockholders’ deficit	(254.6		)	(236.1		)	(277.5		)	(218.9		)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	521.9		$	713.5		$	506.0		$	675.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

CENTRUS ENERGY CORP.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

( ~~(Unaudited)~~Unaudited;

(in millions, except share and per share data)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Revenue:
Separative work units	$	43.5		$	14.1		$	82.2		$	128.3		$	17.6		$	43.5		$	68.2		$	82.2
Uranium	—			—			—			14.3			11.3			—			14.9			—
Contract services	6.8			7.3			19.3			32.2			5.2			6.8			26.1			19.3
Total revenue	50.3			21.4			101.5			174.8			34.1			50.3			109.2			101.5
Cost of Sales:
Separative work units and uranium	32.4			15.9			76.8			130.7			20.9			32.7			98.6			77.9
Contract services	6.3			7.6			19.9			24.9			5.4			6.3			18.8			19.9
Total cost of sales	38.7			23.5			96.7			155.6			26.3			39.0			117.4			97.8
Gross profit (loss)	11.6			(2.1		)	4.8			19.2			7.8			11.3			(8.2		)	3.7
Advanced technology license and decommissioning costs	4.5			21.9			15.0			38.6			5.8			4.5			19.2			15.0
Selling, general and administrative	11.0			10.7			33.1			34.6			8.8			11.0			29.7			33.1
Amortization of intangible assets	2.5			1.7			5.7			7.6			1.7			2.5			4.5			5.7
Special charges for workforce reductions and advisory costs	2.4			0.6			7.1			1.2			0.6			2.4			1.5			7.1
Gains on sales of assets	(0.6		)	(0.3		)	(2.3		)	(1.0		)	—			(0.6		)	(0.3		)	(2.3		)
Operating loss	(8.2		)	(36.7		)	(53.8		)	(61.8		)	(9.1		)	(8.5		)	(62.8		)	(54.9		)
Gain on early extinguishment of debt	—			—			(33.6		)	(16.7		)	—			—			—			(33.6		)
Nonoperating components of net periodic benefit expense (income)													(1.6		)	(0.3		)	(4.9		)	(1.1		)
Interest expense	0.7			4.7			4.3			14.8			1.0			0.7			3.0			4.3
Investment income	(0.4		)	(0.1		)	(1.0		)	(0.5		)	(0.7		)	(0.4		)	(1.9		)	(1.0		)
Loss before income taxes	(8.5		)	(41.3		)	(23.5		)	(59.4		)	(7.8		)	(8.5		)	(59.0		)	(23.5		)
Income tax benefit	—			—			(0.2		)	(0.6		)	—			—			(0.1		)	(0.2		)
Net loss	(8.5		)	(41.3		)	(23.3		)	(58.8		)	(7.8		)	(8.5		)	(58.9		)	(23.3		)
Preferred stock dividends - undeclared and cumulative	2.0			—			5.0			—			1.9			2.0			5.9			5.0
Net loss allocable to common stockholders	$	(10.5	)	$	(41.3	)	$	(28.3	)	$	(58.8	)	$	(9.7	)	$	(10.5	)	$	(64.8	)	$	(28.3	)

Net loss per common share – basic and diluted	$	(1.15	)	$	(4.54	)	$	(3.12	)	$	(6.46	)
Average number of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted (in thousands)	9,103			9,096			9,081			9,102
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted													$	(1.06	)	$	(1.15	)	$	(7.11	)	$	(3.12	)
Average number of common shares outstanding - basic and diluted (in thousands)													9,133			9,103			9,118			9,081

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

CENTRUS ENERGY CORP.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

( ~~(Unaudited)~~Unaudited;

(in millions)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Net loss	$	(8.5	)	$	(41.3	)	$	(23.3	)	$	(58.8	)	$	(7.8	)	$	(8.5	)	$	(58.9	)	$	(23.3	)
Other comprehensive loss, before tax (Note 13):
Other comprehensive loss, before tax (Note 12):
Amortization of prior service credits, net	—			(0.1		)	(0.1		)	(0.2		)	—			—			(0.1		)	(0.1		)
Other comprehensive loss, before tax	—			(0.1		)	(0.1		)	(0.2		)	—			—			(0.1		)	(0.1		)
Income tax benefit related to items of other comprehensive income	—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit	—			(0.1		)	(0.1		)	(0.2		)	—			—			(0.1		)	(0.1		)
Comprehensive loss	$	(8.5	)	$	(41.4	)	$	(23.4	)	$	(59.0	)	$	(7.8	)	$	(8.5	)	$	(59.0	)	$	(23.4	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

CENTRUS ENERGY CORP.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

( ~~(Unaudited)~~Unaudited;

(in millions)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
Operating Activities
Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(23.3	)	$	(58.8	)	$	(58.9	)	$	(23.3	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	6.6			8.1			5.1			6.6
PIK interest on paid-in-kind toggle notes	1.2			9.7			1.2			1.2
Gain on early extinguishment of debt	(33.6		)	(16.7		)	—			(33.6		)
Gain on sales of assets	(2.3		)	(1.0		)	(0.3		)	(2.3		)
Inventory valuation adjustments	—			3.0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	14.5			18.4			57.6			14.5
Inventories, net	17.9			45.8			30.6			17.9
Payables under SWU purchase agreements	(42.3		)	(68.9		)	(64.8		)	(42.3		)
Deferred revenue, net of deferred costs	2.9			5.8			(16.7		)	2.9
Accounts payable and other liabilities	(35.3		)	2.2			(1.4		)	(20.1		)
Pension and postretirement liabilities							(21.3		)	(6.2		)
Other, net	(1.9		)	0.5			(8.8		)	(1.9		)
Cash used in operating activities	(95.6		)	(51.9		)	(77.7		)	(86.6		)

Investing Activities
Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures	(0.3		)	(3.0		)	(0.1		)	(0.3		)
Proceeds from sales of assets	2.1			1.2			0.4			2.1
Deposits for surety bonds - net decrease	—			0.3
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities	1.8			(1.5		)
Cash provided by investing activities							0.3			1.8

Financing Activities
Financing Activities:
Payment of interest classified as debt	(3.4		)	—			(6.1		)	(3.4		)
Repurchase of debt	(27.6		)	(9.8		)	—			(27.6		)
Payment of securities transaction costs							—			(9.0		)
Cash used in financing activities	(31.0		)	(9.8		)	(6.1		)	(40.0		)

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(124.8		)	(63.2		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	260.7			234.0
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	135.9		$	170.8
Decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash							(83.5		)	(124.8		)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period⁽¹⁾							244.8			296.7
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period⁽¹⁾							$	161.3		$	171.9

Supplemental cash flow information:
Interest paid in cash	$	4.2		$	6.5		$	0.8		$	4.2
Non-cash activities:
Conversion of interest payable-in-kind to long-term debt	$	0.4		$	3.4
Conversion of interest payable-in-kind to debt							$	1.7		$	0.4
Exchange of debt for Series B preferred stock							$	—		$	4.6

_______________

⁽¹⁾Refer to Note 4, Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

CENTRUS ENERGY CORP.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

(Unaudited; in millions, except per share data)



	Preferred Stock, Series B		Common Stock, Class A, Par Value $.10 per Share		Common Stock, Class B, Par Value $.10 per Share		Excess of Capital Over Par Value		Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Total

Balance at December 31, 2016	$	—	$	0.8	$	0.1	$	59.5	$	(296.7	)	$	0.2		$	(236.1	)
Net loss	—		—		—		—		(23.3		)	—			(23.3		)
Issuance of preferred stock	4.6		—		—		—		—			—			4.6
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit (Note 12)	—		—		—		—		—			(0.1		)	(0.1		)
Restricted stock units and stock options issued, net of amortization	—		—		—		0.3		—			—			0.3
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	4.6	$	0.8	$	0.1	$	59.8	$	(320.0	)	$	0.1		$	(254.6	)

Balance at December 31, 2017	$	4.6	$	0.8	$	0.1	$	60.0	$	(284.5	)	$	0.1		$	(218.9	)
Adoption of ASC 606 as of January 1, 2018 (Note 1)	—		—		—		—		0.1			—			0.1
Net loss	—		—		—		—		(58.9		)	—			(58.9		)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit (Note 12)	—		—		—		—		—			(0.1		)	(0.1		)
Restricted stock units and stock options issued, net of amortization	—		—		—		0.3		—			—			0.3
Balance at September 30, 2018	$	4.6	$	0.8	$	0.1	$	60.3	$	(343.3	)	$	—		$	(277.5	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these ~~condensed consolidated financial statements.~~

~~CENTRUS ENERGY CORP.~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT~~ ~~(Unaudited)~~

~~(in millions, except per share data)~~

Preferred Stock,
Series B

Common Stock,
Class A,
Par Value
$.10 per Share

Common Stock,
Class B,
Par Value
$.10 per Share

Excess of
Capital Over
Par Value
Accumulated Deficit
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
Total

Balance at December 31, 2015 $ —
$ 0.8
$ 0.1
$ 59.0
$ (229.7 ) $ 4.1
$ (165.7 )
Net loss —
—
—
—
(58.8 ) —
(58.8 )
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit (Note 13) —
—
—
—
—
(0.2 ) (0.2 )
Restricted stock units and stock options issued, net of amortization —
—
—
0.4
—
—
0.4
Balance at September 30, 2016 $ —
$ 0.8
$ 0.1
$ 59.4
$ (288.5 ) $ 3.9
$ (224.3 )

Balance at December 31, 2016 $ —
$ 0.8
$ 0.1
$ 59.5
$ (296.7 ) $ 0.2
$ (236.1 )
Net loss —
—
—
—
(23.3 ) —
(23.3 )
Issuance of preferred stock 4.6
—
—
—
—
—
4.6
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit (Note 13) —
—
—
—
—
(0.1 ) (0.1 )
Restricted stock units and stock options issued, net of amortization —
—
—
0.3
—
—
0.3
Balance at September 30, 2017 $ 4.6
$ 0.8
$ 0.1
$ 59.8
$ (320.0 ) $ 0.1
$ (254.6 )

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these~~unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

CENTRUS ENERGY CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Centrus Energy Corp. (“Centrus” or the “Company”), which include the accounts of the Company, its principal subsidiary United States Enrichment Corporation ~~(“Enrichment Corp.”)~~ and its other subsidiaries, as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, was derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). ~~The~~In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, ~~that are, in the opinion of management,~~including normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the financial results for the interim period. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation. Certain information and notes normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. All material intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes and Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

Correction of Error

In the second quarter of 2018, Management identified a classification error for $0.3 million of costs that had been previously included in Cost of Sales for the Contract Services Segment in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018. These costs are now included in Advanced Technology License and Decommissioning Costs in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The Company considered quantitative and qualitative factors in assessing the materiality of the classification error and determined that the classification error was not material. This revision had no impact to the Company’s net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2018 or the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

New Accounting Standards

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In ~~May~~ 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, ~~(Topic 606). ASU 2014-09 introduces a new five-step revenue recognition model in~~ which ~~an entity should recognize~~requires revenue to ~~depict the transfer~~be recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods orand services ~~to customers in~~at an amount that reflects the consideration ~~to which~~ the ~~entity~~Company expects to ~~be entitled~~receive in exchange for those goods orand services. In addition, ASU 2014-09 ~~also requires~~and subsequent amendments, collectively known as Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606 (“ASC 606”) require certain additional disclosures ~~sufficient to enable users to understand~~regarding the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of ~~revenue~~revenues and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, including qualitative and quantitative disclosures about contracts with customers, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. The FASB has since issued amendments that clarify a number of specific issues as well as require additional disclosures. The revenue recognition standard will become effective for the Company beginning with the first quarter of 2018. The Company has started an implementation process, including a review of customer contracts, to evaluate the effect this standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company continues to assess the potential impacts of the new standard on its consolidated financial statements, including substantive new disclosures. The Company plans to select the modified retrospective transition method upon adoption effective January 1, 2018.customers.

~~In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,~~ ~~Leases (Topic 842),~~ which requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting expense recognition in the statement of operations. ASU 2016-02 will become effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2019, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is evaluating the effect that the provisions of ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

~~In March 2016,~~The Company adopted ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, using the ~~FASB issued ASU 2016-09,~~ ~~Stock Compensation - Improvements~~modified retrospective method. The new standard was applied to ~~Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718). ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects~~contracts that were not completed as of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 became effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2017. Under ASU 2016-09, entities are permitted to make an accounting policy election to either estimate forfeitures on share-based payment awards, as previously required, or to recognize forfeitures as they occur.adoption date. The Company recognized the cumulative effect of initially applying ASC 606 of $0.1 million as an adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit. The comparative information has ~~elected~~not been restated and continues to ~~recognize forfeitures as they occur. The adoption of ASU 2016-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.~~be presented according to accounting standards in effect for those periods. Refer to Note 2, Revenue Recognition and Contracts with Customers, for additional information.

~~In August 2016,~~The following table summarizes the ~~FASB issued ASU 2016-15,~~ ~~Statement~~cumulative effect of ~~Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification~~the changes to the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet as of ~~Certain Cash Receipts~~January 1, 2018, from the adoption of ASC 606 (in millions):



	Balance at December 31, 2017			Adjustment for ASC 606		Balance at January 1, 2018
Assets:
Unbilled contract revenue	$	—		$	0.1	$	0.1
Stockholders’ Deficit:
Accumulated Deficit	(284.5		)	0.1		(284.4		)

The following table summarizes the impact of adopting ASC 606 on revenue and ~~Cash Payments~~. ASU 2016-15 addresses the presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. It is intended to reduce diversity in practice by providing guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. ASU 2016-15 will become effectivenet loss for the ~~Company beginning in the first quarter of~~three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied using a retrospective approach. The Company is evaluating the effect that the provisions of ASU 2016-15 will have on its consolidated financial statements.(in millions):



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018								Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
	As Reported			Under Previous Accounting			Effect of Adoption		As Reported			Under Previous Accounting			Effect of Adoption
Revenue	$	34.1		$	32.2		$	1.9	$	109.2		$	109.3		$	(0.1	)
Net loss	(7.8		)	(9.7		)	1.9		(58.9		)	(58.8		)	(0.1		)

~~In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16,~~ ~~Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers~~The effect of ~~Assets Other Than Inventory,~~ ~~requiring an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. ASU 2016-16 will become effective~~adoption for the ~~Company beginning in~~nine months ended September 30, 2018, includes the ~~first quarter~~opening balance adjustment of ~~2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that the provisions of ASU 2016-16 will have on its consolidated financial statements.~~

~~In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18,~~ ~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash~~. ASU 2016-18 requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is to be applied retrospectively for each period presented, and will become effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that the provisions of ASU 2016-18 will have on its consolidated financial statements.$0.1 million.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. ASU 2017-07 requires changes to the presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost on the statement of operations by requiring service cost to be presented with other employee compensation costs and other components of net periodic benefit cost to be presented outside of any subtotal of operating income. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018, on a retrospective basis for all periods presented, and certain prior period amounts have been recast to conform with the current presentation as follows (in millions):



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017								Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
	As Previously Reported		Adjustments			Current Presentation			As Previously Reported		Adjustments			Current Presentation
Cost of sales - separative work units and uranium	$	32.4	$	0.3		$	32.7		$	76.8	$	1.1		$	77.9
Nonoperating components of net periodic benefit expense (income)	—		(0.3		)	(0.3		)	—		(1.1		)	(1.1		)

Refer to Note 9, Pension and Postretirement Benefits, for additional information.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~2017-07 also stipulates that only~~2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 addresses the ~~service cost component~~presentation and classification of ~~net benefit cost~~certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. It is ~~eligible for capitalization~~intended to reduce diversity in ~~assets. The~~practice by providing guidance ~~will become~~on eight specific cash flow issues. ASU 2016-15 became effective for the Company ~~beginning~~on January 1, 2018. Upon adoption, the Company reclassified $9.0 million of transaction costs incurred in the first quarter of 2017 related to the note exchange (see Note 7, Debt) in the statement of cash flows as follows (in millions):



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
	As Previously Reported			Adjustments			Current Presentation
Cash used in operating activities	$	(95.6	)	$	9.0		$	(86.6	)
Cash used in financing activities	(31.0		)	(9.0		)	(40.0		)

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. ASU 2016-18 requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is to be applied retrospectively for each period presented. The Company adopted the new standard on January 1, 2018. Upon adoption, the Company added its restricted cash balances to the consolidated statement of cash flows, and the prior period amounts have been recast to conform with the current presentation.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, requiring the recognition of the current and deferred income taxes resulting from an intra-entity transfer of assets other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The Company adopted the new standard on January 1, 2018, on a modified retrospective basis. The adoption of ASU 2016-16 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, including the cumulative effect adjustment required upon adoption.

Accounting Standards Effective in Future Periods

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either financing or operating, with classification affecting expense recognition in the statement of operations. The standard is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The new guidance, as amended in July 2018 by ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, requires a transition adoption election using either 1) a modified retrospective approach with periods prior to the adoption date being recast or 2) a prospective adoption approach with a cumulative-effect adjustment recognized to the opening balance of retained earnings on the adoption date with prior periods not recast. The Company is finalizing its evaluation of lease arrangements. In the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Company reported undiscounted operating lease obligations of approximately $13 million as of December 31, 2017. The Company anticipates adopting this standard on January 1, 2019, using the prospective adoption approach.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20), which modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement plans. ASU 2018-14 is effective for public companies for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. The standard is to be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented and early adoption is permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect that the provisions of ASU ~~2017-07~~2018-14 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

~~2. SPECIAL CHARGES~~Significant Accounting Policies

~~Evolving Business Needs~~The accounting policies of the Company are set forth in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Updates to those policies as a result of the adoption of ASC 606 have been included in Note 2, Revenue Recognition and Contracts with Customers.

~~Evolving business needs~~

2. REVENUE RECOGNITION AND CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method as applied to customer contracts that were not completed as of the adoption date. As a result, financial information for reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, are presented under ASC 606, while comparative financial information has not been adjusted and continues to be reported in accordance with the Company’s historical accounting policy for revenue recognition prior to the adoption of ASC 606. There was no material impact of adopting ASC 606 for sales under the LEU Segment. For sales under the Contract Services Segment, revenue is now primarily recognized using a cost-to-cost method to measure the transfer of control of contract services to the customer.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue for product and service sales is recognized when or as the Company transfers control of the promised products or services to the customer. Revenue is measured at the transaction price which is based on the amount of consideration that the Company expects to receive in exchange for transferring the promised goods or services to the customer. The transaction price will include estimates of variable consideration to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of revenue recognized will not occur.

Revenue for the Company’s LEU Segment is derived from sales of the separative work units (“SWU”) component of low-enriched uranium (“LEU”), from sales of both the SWU and uranium components of LEU, and from sales of uranium. Contracts with customers are primarily long-term, fixed-commitment contracts under which its customers are obligated to purchase a specified quantity of the SWU component of LEU or the SWU and uranium components of LEU. The Company’s contracts for natural uranium are generally shorter-term, fixed- commitment contracts.

Revenue is recognized at the time the customer obtains control of the LEU or uranium. Customers generally obtain control of LEU at fuel fabricators. Centrus ships LEU to nuclear fuel fabricators for scheduled or anticipated orders from utility customers. Based on customer orders, Centrus arranges for the transfer of title of LEU from Centrus to the customer for the specified quantity of LEU at the fuel fabricator. Revenue is recognized when control of LEU is transferred to the customer at the fuel fabricator. Each such delivery to a customer is accounted for as a distinct performance obligation under a contract, and a contract may call for multiple deliveries over a number of periods. The contract’s transaction price is allocated to each performance obligation based on the observable standalone selling price of each distinct delivery of SWU or uranium.

Utility customers in general have ~~resulted~~the option to defer physical receipt of LEU or uranium purchased from the Company beyond the contractual sale period. In such cases, title to LEU or uranium is transferred to the customer and a performance obligation for Centrus is created and a receivable is recorded. Cash is collected for the receivable under normal credit terms. The performance obligation is represented as Deferred Revenue on the balance sheet and the customer-titled product is classified as Deferred Costs Associated with Deferred Revenue. Risk of loss remains with Centrus until physical delivery occurs. The recognition of revenue and related cost of sales occurs at the time physical delivery occurs and control and risk of loss of the product transfer to the customer, which may occur beyond one year. The timing of physical delivery, subject to notice period requirements, is at the option of the customer. As such, deferred costs and deferred revenue are classified within current assets and current liabilities, respectively.

On occasion, the Company will accept payment in ~~workforce reductions since 2013.~~the form of uranium. Revenue from the sale of SWU under such contracts is recognized at the time LEU is delivered and is based on the fair value of the uranium at contract inception or as the quantity of uranium is finalized, if variable. In the second quarter of 2018, the Company received uranium valued at $14.5 million from a customer that elected to defer a SWU purchase obligation for a period greater than one year. Under the contract, the customer has not received title to SWU or LEU product from the Company. The Company’s contract liability to the customer is classified as Advances from Customers, a noncurrent liability.

Amounts billed to customers for handling costs are included in sales. Handling costs are accounted for as a fulfillment cost and are included in cost of sales. The Company does not have shipping costs associated with outbound freight after control over a product has transferred to a customer. The Company’s contracts with customers do not provide for significant payment terms or financing components.

Revenue for the Contract Services Segment, principally representing engineering and testing activities performed by the Company as well as technical and resource support, is recognized over the contractual period as services are rendered. The contract services segment also includes limited services provided by Centrus to the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) and its contractors at the Portsmouth site related to facilities the Company leases from DOE. In the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, special charges~~2018, revenue for the contract services segment included $9.5 million under a January 2018 settlement agreement with DOE and the U.S. government. Refer below to Contract Balances for additional details.

The Company recognizes revenue over time as it performs on these contracts because of the continuous transfer of control to the customer. With control transferring over time, revenue is recognized based on the extent of progress towards completion of the performance obligation. A contract may contain one or more performance obligations. Two or more promises to transfer goods or services to a customer may be considered a single performance obligation if the goods or services are highly interdependent or highly interrelated such that utility of the promised goods or services to the customer includes integration services provided by the Company.

The Company principally uses the cost-to-cost input method of progress for its contracts because it best depicts the transfer of control to the customer that occurs as the Company incurs costs. Under the cost-to-cost method, the extent of progress towards completion is measured based on the proportion of direct costs incurred to date to the total estimated ~~employee termination benefits~~direct costs at completion of ~~$2.2 million, including $0.7 million~~the performance obligation. Revenues are recorded proportionally as costs are incurred. If transaction prices are not stated in the ~~three months ended September 30, 2017. Centrus expects~~contract for each performance obligation, contractual prices are allocated to ~~make payments~~performance obligations based on estimated relative standalone selling prices of the promised services. For contracts that are not accounted for under the percentage of completion method, the Company records revenue as services are provided. The Company recognizes time-and-material contract revenue at negotiated, fixed, contractually billable rates as it delivers labor hours and incurs other direct expenses.

The Company has applied the practical expedient in paragraph ASC 606 and does not provide the value of remaining performance obligations under service contracts having original expected terms of one year or less.

The timing of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of invoicing to customers. Progress on satisfying performance obligations under contracts with customers and the related billings and cash collections are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as contract assets or contract liabilities. Contract balances are classified as assets or liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis at the end of each reporting period.

Unbilled receivables (contract assets) are included in Accounts Receivable and arise when the timing of cash collected from customers differs from the timing of revenue recognition, such as when contract provisions require specific milestones to be met before a customer can be billed. Those assets are recognized when the revenue associated with the contract is recognized prior to billing and derecognized when billed in accordance with the terms of the contract. To the extent billings to the customer precede the recognition of contract services revenue, the Company recognizes a liability included in Deferred Revenue and Advances from Customers on the consolidated balance sheet.

Disaggregation of Revenue

The following table presents revenue from SWU and uranium sales disaggregated by geographical region based on the billing addresses of customers (in millions):



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
United States	$	0.3	$	26.2	$	54.3	$	37.1
Europe	28.6		17.3		28.7		17.4
Asia	—		—		0.1		27.7
Revenue - SWU and uranium	$	28.9	$	43.5	$	83.1	$	82.2

Refer to Note 13, Segment Information, for disaggregation of revenue by segment. Disaggregation by end-market is provided in Note 13 and the condensed consolidated statement of operations. SWU and uranium sales are made primarily to electric utility customers. Contract services revenue results primarily from services provided to government contractors and, in the ~~fourth~~first quarter of ~~2017 related to~~2018, the ~~$1.4 million balance payable~~settlement with DOE and the U.S. government. SWU and uranium revenue is recognized at ~~September 30, 2017.~~point of sale and contract services revenue is generally recognized over time.

~~In the second quarter of 2016, the Company commenced a project to align its corporate structure to the scale of its ongoing business operations~~Contract Balances

The following table represents changes in our contract assets and ~~to update related information technology systems. The Company incurred advisory costs of $0.3 million~~contract liabilities balances (in millions):



	September 30, 2018		January 1, 2018		Year-To-Date Change
Contract assets
Accounts receivable:
Billed	$	2.5	$	60.2	$	(57.7	)
Unbilled contract revenue	—		0.1		(0.1		)
Accounts receivable	$	2.5	$	60.3	$	(57.8	)

Deferred costs associated with deferred revenue	$	122.7	$	122.3	$	0.4

Contract liabilities
Deferred revenue and advances from customers - current:
Deferred revenue	$	175.6	$	172.5	$	3.1
Advances from customers	—		19.3		(19.3		)
Deferred revenue and advances from customers - current	$	175.6	$	191.8	$	(16.2	)

Advances from customers - noncurrent	$	14.5	$	—	$	14.5

Deferred cost and ~~$0.8 million related to the reengineering project~~deferred revenue activity in the ~~three and~~ nine months ended September 30, ~~2016, respectively. The~~2018, follows (in millions):



	Deferred Sales in the Period		Previously Deferred Sales Recognized in the Period			Year-To-Date Change
Deferred costs associated with deferred revenue	$	10.6	$	(10.2	)	$	0.4
Deferred revenue	23.3		(20.2		)	3.1

On January 11, 2018, the Company ~~incurred advisory costs~~entered into a settlement agreement with DOE and the U.S. government regarding breach of ~~$1.7~~contract claims relating to work performed by the Company under contracts with DOE and subcontracts with DOE contractors. DOE agreed to settle all claims raised as part of and subsequent to the litigation, except with respect to certain claims for pension and postretirement benefits, for a total of $24.0 million and ~~$5.0 million in~~provide a complete close out of all such contracts and subcontracts settled under the ~~three and~~settlement agreement without any further audit or review of the Company’s costs or incurred cost submissions. Prior to the settlement, the Company had a receivables balance related to the claims being settled of $14.5 million. In the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, respectively.~~2018, the Company (a) received $4.7 million from the U.S. government, (b) applied approximately $19.3 million of advances from the U.S. government received in prior years against the receivables balance, and (c) recorded additional revenue of $9.5 million.

~~Piketon Demonstration Facility~~Centrus and DOE have yet to fully settle the Company’s claims for reimbursements for certain pension and postretirement benefits costs related to past contract work performed for DOE. There is the potential for additional revenue to be recognized for this work pending the outcome of legal proceedings related to the Company’s claims for payment and the potential release of previously established valuation allowances on receivables. As a result of the application of fresh start accounting following the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on September 30, 2014, the receivables related to the Company’s claims for payment are carried at fair value as of September 30, 2014, which is net of the valuation allowances.

LEU Segment Order Book

The SWU component of LEU is typically bought and sold under long-term contracts with deliveries over several years. The Company’s agreements for natural uranium sales are generally shorter-term, fixed-commitment contracts. The Company’s order book of sales under contract in the LEU Segment (“order book”) extends for more than a decade. The order book represents the Company’s remaining performance obligations under these contracts and includes the Deferred Revenue amounts in the Contract Balances table above. The order book was $1.1 billion as of September 30, 2018, compared to $1.3 billion at December 31, 2017, reflecting completed deliveries and new contracts signed in the nine months ended September 30, 2018, and a rejection of a contract by a customer in bankruptcy proceedings. No other adjustments were required to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as a result of the contract rejection. Refer to Note 14, Subsequent Event, for additional information regarding the customer and claims filed by the Company.

Most of the Company’s contracts provide for fixed purchases of SWU during a given year. The Company’s estimate of the aggregate dollar amount of future SWU and uranium sales is partially based on customers’ estimates of the timing and size of their fuel requirements and other assumptions that are subject to change. For example, depending on the terms of specific contracts, the customer may be able to increase or decrease the quantity delivered within an agreed range. The Company’s order book estimate is also based on the Company’s estimates of selling prices, which are subject to change. For example, depending on the terms of specific contracts, prices may be adjusted based on escalation using a general inflation index, published SWU price indicators prevailing at the time of delivery, and other factors, all of which are variable. The Company uses external composite forecasts of future market prices and inflation rates in its pricing estimates. Refer to Item 1A, Risk Factors, of the Company’s 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of risks related to the Company’s order book.

3. SPECIAL CHARGES

Special charges totaled $1.5 million and $7.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, and 2017, respectively, including advisory costs of $0.1 million and $5.0 million. In ~~September 2015, Centrus completed a successful three-year~~2018 and 2017, advisory costs related to updating the Company’s information technology systems.

Workforce reductions have resulted from evolving business needs and the completion of the demonstration of ~~its~~ American Centrifuge technology at ~~its~~the Company’s facility in Piketon, Ohio. ~~The demonstration effort was primarily funded by~~Without mutual agreement between Centrus and DOE regarding other possible uses for the ~~U.S. government. As a result~~Piketon facility, the remaining balance of ~~reduced program funding, Centrus incurred a special charge~~termination benefits of $3.2 million related to the Piketon facility is expected to be paid in the third quarter of ~~2015 for estimated employee termination benefits. Of the remaining $4.9 million liability as of September 30, 2017, $2.8 million~~2019 and is classified ~~as current and included~~ in Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilitiesin the condensed consolidated balance sheet. ~~The remaining $2.1 million is included in~~ ~~Other Long-Term Liabilities~~ ~~and is expected to be paid through 2019.~~

A summary of termination benefit activity ~~and~~and related liabilities follows (in millions):


	Liability December 31, 2016			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017						Liability September 30, 2017		Liability December 31, 2017			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018						Liability September 30, 2018
			Charges for Termination Benefits			Paid/ Settled				Liability September 30, 2017		Liability December 31, 2017		Charges for Termination Benefits			Paid/Settled				Liability September 30, 2018
Workforce reductions:	Liability December 31, 2016
Evolving business needs	$	0.1		$	2.2		$	(0.9	)	$	1.4	$	0.8		$	1.3		$	(1.5	)	$	0.6
Piketon demonstration facility	5.4			0.1			(0.6		)	4.9		5.7			0.1			(2.6		)	3.2
	$	5.5		$	2.3		$	(1.5	)	$	6.3
Total												$	6.5		$	1.4		$	(4.1	)	$	3.8

~~3. CONTRACT SERVICES~~4. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND ~~ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LICENSE AND DECOMMISSIONING COSTS~~

~~The contract services segment includes~~ ~~Revenue~~ ~~and~~ ~~Cost of Sales~~ for engineering and testing work Centrus performs on the American Centrifuge technology under a government contract with UT-Battelle, LLC (“UT-Battelle”), the operator of Oak Ridge National Laboratory (“ORNL”). The recently completed fixed priced contract between Centrus and UT-Battelle (the “2017 ORNL Contract”) was for the period from October 1, 2016, through September 30, 2017 and generated revenue of approximately $25 million. On October 26, 2017, the parties executed a new fixed priced contract for the period from October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018, that is expected to generate total revenue of approximately $16 million upon completion of defined milestones. The ORNL contracts have been funded incrementally. Funding for the program is provided to UT-Battelle by the U.S. government which is currently operating under a continuing resolution.RESTRICTED CASH

The ~~2017 ORNL Contract provided~~following table summarizes the Company’s cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as presented on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet to amounts on the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows (in millions):



	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017

Cash and cash equivalents	$	124.9	$	208.8
Deposits for financial assurance - current	30.2		16.3
Deposits for financial assurance - noncurrent	6.2		19.7
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	161.3	$	244.8

The following table provides additional detail regarding the Company’s deposits for ~~payments for monthly reports of deliverables of approximately $2.0 million per month and additional aggregate payments of $1.0 million based on completion of defined milestones.~~financial assurance (in millions):



	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
	Current		Long-Term		Current		Long-Term
NRC license	$	16.3	$	—	$	16.1	$	—
DOE lease	13.7		—		—		13.5
Workers compensation	—		5.9		—		5.9
Other	0.2		0.3		0.2		0.3
Total deposits for financial assurance	$	30.2	$	6.2	$	16.3	$	19.7

The Company’s contract with UT-Battelle that ended September 30, 2016 (the “2016 ORNL Contract”), provided for payments for monthly reports of deliverables of approximately $2.7 million per month. The 2016 ORNL Contract, which was signed in March 2016, provided for payments for reports related to work performed since October 1, 2015. ~~Revenue~~ ~~in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, includes $24.2 million for reports on work performed in the nine months ended September 30, 2016,~~

Piketon Facility Obligations and ~~$8.1 million for March 2016 reports on work performed in the three months ended December 31, 2015. Expenses for contract work performed in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, are included in~~ ~~Cost of Sales. Expenses for work performed in the three months ended December 31, 2015, before entering into the 2016 ORNL Contract, were included in~~ ~~Advanced Technology License and Decommissioning Costs~~ ~~in 2015.~~Surety Bonds

~~American Centrifuge expenses that are outside of the Company’s contracts~~Centrus commenced with ~~UT-Battelle are included in~~ ~~Advanced Technology License and Decommissioning Costs,~~ including ongoing costs to maintain the demobilized Piketon facility and our licenses from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) at that location. In the second quarter of 2016, the Company commenced the decontamination and decommissioning (“D&D”) of the Piketon facility in accordance with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) license requirements in 2016. Centrus has previously provided financial assurance to the NRC for the D&D work in the form of surety bonds that are fully cash collateralized by Centrus for $16.3 million. Centrus believes the D&D work required for elimination of financial assurance under NRC license requirements has been completed and is working with the ~~U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”). Refer~~NRC to ~~Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies, for additional details.~~have the surety bonds cancelled, which would permit the Company to receive the cash collateral.

~~4. RECEIVABLES~~

September 30,
2017 December 31,
2016
(in millions)
Utility customers and other $ 9.1
$ 15.3
Contract services, primarily DOE 5.1
4.6
Accounts receivable $ 14.2
$ 19.9

Centrus ~~formerly performed site services work under contracts with~~leases the Piketon facility from DOE. At the conclusion of the lease on June 30, 2019, without mutual agreement between Centrus and DOE regarding other possible uses for the facility, Centrus is obligated to return the facility to DOE in a condition that meets NRC license requirements and in the same condition as the facility was in when it was leased to Centrus (other than due to normal wear and tear). Centrus must remove all Company-owned capital improvements at the ~~former Portsmouth~~Piketon facility, unless otherwise consented to by DOE, by the conclusion of the lease term. The estimated cost for these lease termination obligations, included in Accounts Payable and ~~Paducah gaseous diffusion plants. Overdue receivables from DOE of $14.2~~Accrued Liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet, is $1.6 million and $1.8 million as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018 and ~~$22.8 million as of~~ December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. Centrus has previously provided financial assurance to DOE for the lease turnover obligations in the form of surety bonds that are ~~included in~~ ~~Other Long-Term Assets~~ ~~based on~~fully cash collateralized by Centrus for $13.7 million. Centrus expects to receive cash when these surety bonds are reduced and/or cancelled as the ~~extended timeframe expected to resolve the Company’s claims for payment.~~Company fulfills its lease turnover obligations.

Financial Assurance for Workers’ Compensation

The Company has provided financial assurance to states in which it was previously self-insured for workers’ compensation in accordance with the state requirements in the form of a surety bond and a letter of credit that are fully cash collateralized by Centrus ~~has unapplied payments from DOE that may~~for $5.9 million. The surety bond and letter of credit will be ~~used, at DOE’s direction, (a) to pay for future services provided by~~cancelled, and the Company ~~or (b)~~expects to ~~reduce outstanding receivables balances due from DOE. The balance of unapplied payments of $19.3 million as of September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, is included in~~ ~~Other Long-Term Liabilities~~ ~~pending resolution of~~receive cash when each state determines the ~~long-term receivables from DOE described above.~~Company has no further workers’ compensation obligations.

5. INVENTORIES

Centrus holds uranium at licensed locations in the form of natural uranium and as the uranium component of ~~low enriched uranium (“LEU”).~~LEU. Centrus also holds ~~separative work units (“SWU”)~~SWU as the SWU component of LEU at licensed locations (e.g., fabricators) to meet book transfer requests by customers. Fabricators process LEU into fuel for use in nuclear reactors. Components of inventories follow (in millions):


	September 30, 2017						December 31, 2016						September 30, 2018						December 31, 2017
	Current Assets		Current Liabilities (a)		Inventories, Net		Current Assets		Current Liabilities (a)		Inventories, Net		Current Assets		Current Liabilities (a)		Inventories, Net		Current Assets		Current Liabilities (a)		Inventories, Net
Separative work units	$	73.7	$	3.2	$	70.5	$	115.8	$	15.2	$	100.6	$	31.2	$	4.7	$	26.5	$	47.2	$	15.0	$	32.2
Uranium	50.2		18.9		31.3		61.4		42.3		19.1		98.2		65.5		32.7		105.9		62.9		43.0
Materials and supplies	0.2		—		0.2		0.2		—		0.2
	$	124.1	$	22.1	$	102.0	$	177.4	$	57.5	$	119.9
Total													$	129.4	$	70.2	$	59.2	$	153.1	$	77.9	$	75.2


(a)	Inventories owed to customers and suppliers, included in current liabilities, include SWU and uranium inventories owed to fabricators.

6. ~~PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT~~

September 30,
2017 December 31,
2016
(in millions)
Property, plant and equipment, gross 6.9
6.8
Accumulated depreciation (1.7 ) (0.8 )
Property, plant and equipment, net $ 5.2
$ 6.0

7. INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets originated from the Company’s reorganization and application of fresh start accounting as of the date the Company emerged from bankruptcy, September 30, 2014, and reflect the conditions at that time. The intangible asset related to the sales order book is amortized as the order book existing at emergence is reduced, principally as a result of deliveries to customers. The intangible asset related to customer relationships is amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated average useful life of 15 years. Amortization expense is presented below gross profit on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. Intangible asset balances are as follows (in millions):


	September 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
													September 30, 2018						December 31, 2017
					(in millions)
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount
Sales order book	$	54.6	$	22.1	$	32.5	$	54.6	$	19.9	$	34.7	$	54.6	$	27.0	$	27.6	$	54.6	$	25.9	$	28.7
Customer relationships	68.9		13.8		55.1		68.9		10.3		58.6		68.9		18.4		50.5		68.9		14.9		54.0
Total	$	123.5	$	35.9	$	87.6	$	123.5	$	30.2	$	93.3	$	123.5	$	45.4	$	78.1	$	123.5	$	40.8	$	82.7

8.7. DEBT

A summary of ~~long-term~~ debt follows (in millions):


							September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017
	Maturity	September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		Maturity	Current		Long-Term		Current		Long-Term
8.25% Notes:	Feb. 2027					Feb. 2027
Principal		$	74.3	$	—		$	—	$	74.3	$	—	$	74.3
Interest		58.1		—			6.1		45.9		6.1		52.0
8.25% Notes		132.4		—			$	6.1	$	120.2	$	6.1	$	126.3

8% PIK Toggle Notes	Sep. 2019^(a)	31.3		234.6		Sep. 2019^(a)	$	33.0	$	—	$	—	$	31.3
Subtotal		163.7		234.6
Less deferred issuance costs		0.1		0.5			—		—		—		0.1
Total debt		163.6		234.1
Less current portion		6.1		—
Long-term debt		$	157.5	$	234.1
8% PIK Toggle Notes							$	33.0	$	—	$	—	$	31.2

Total							$	39.1	$	120.2	$	6.1	$	157.5

(a) Maturity can be extended to September 2024 upon the satisfaction of certain funding conditions described ~~below.~~in the applicable indenture.

Note Exchange

On February 14, 2017, pursuant to an exchange offer and consent solicitation, Centrus exchanged $204.9 million principal amount of the Company’s 8% paid-in-kind (“PIK”) toggle notes (the “8% PIK Toggle Notes”) for $74.3 million principal amount of 8.25% notes due February 2027 (the “8.25% Notes”), 104,574 shares of Series B Preferred Stock with a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and $27.6 million of cash. The exchange is accounted for as a troubled debt restructuring ~~(a “TDR”)~~ under ~~Accounting Standards Codification~~ASC Subtopic 470-60, Debt-Troubled Debt Restructurings by Debtors. For an exchange classified as a TDR, if the future undiscounted cash flows of the newly issued debt and other consideration are less than the net carrying value of the original debt, a gain is recorded for the difference and the carrying value of the newly issued debt is adjusted to the future undiscounted cash flow amount and no future interest expense is recorded. All future interest payments on the newly issued debt reduce the carrying value. Accordingly, theThe Company ~~recognizes~~recognized the 8.25% Notes on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as the sum of the principal balance and all future interest ~~payments. The Company~~payments and recognized a gain of $33.6 million related to the note exchange for the quarter ended March 31, 2017, which is net of transaction costs of $9.0 million and previously deferred issuance costs related to the 8% PIK Toggle Notes of $0.4 million. Refer to Note ~~13,~~12, Stockholders’ Equity for details related to the ~~newly issued~~ preferred stock.

8.25% Notes

Interest on the 8.25% Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears as of February 28 and August 31 based on a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. The 8.25% Notes mature on February 28, 2027. As described above, all future interest payment obligations on the 8.25% Notes are included in the carrying value of the 8.25% Notes. As a result, the Company’s reported interest expense will be less than its contractual interest payments throughout the term of the 8.25% Notes. As of September 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017, $6.1 million of interest is recorded as current and classified as Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The 8.25% Notes rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future unsubordinated indebtedness other than our Issuer Senior Debt and our Limited Secured Acquisition Debt (each as defined below). The 8.25% Notes rank senior in right of payment to all of our existing and future subordinated indebtedness and to certain limited secured acquisition indebtedness of the Company (the “Limited Secured Acquisition Debt”). The Limited Secured Acquisition Debt includes (i) any indebtedness, the proceeds of which are used to finance all or a portion of an acquisition or similar transaction if any lender’s lien is solely limited to the assets acquired in such a transaction and (ii) any indebtedness, the proceeds of which are used to finance all or a portion of the American Centrifuge project or another next generation enrichment technology if any lender’s lien is solely limited to such

~~assets,~~ ~~provided that~~ a lien securing the 8.25% Notes that is junior with respect to the lien securing such indebtedness, will be effected for the 8.25% Notes, which will be limited to the assets acquired with such Limited Secured Acquisition Debt.

The 8.25% Notes are subordinated in right of payment to certain indebtedness and obligations of the Company, as described in the 8.25% Notes Indenture (the “Issuer Senior Debt”), including (i) any indebtedness of the Company (inclusive of any indebtedness of Enrichment Corp.) under a future credit facility up to $50 million with a maximum net borrowing of $40 million after taking into account any minimum cash balance (unless a higher amount is approved with the consent of the holders of a majority of the aggregate principal amount of the 8.25% Notes then outstanding), (ii) any revolving credit facility to finance inventory purchases and related working capital needs, and (iii) any indebtedness of the Company to Enrichment Corp. under the secured intercompany notes.

The 8.25% Notes are guaranteed on a subordinated and limited basis by, and secured by substantially all of the assets of, Enrichment Corp. The Enrichment Corp. guarantee is a secured obligation and ranks equally in right of payment with all existing and future unsubordinated indebtedness of Enrichment Corp. (other than Designated Senior Claims (as defined below) and Limited Secured Acquisition Debt) and senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness of Enrichment Corp. and Limited Secured Acquisition Debt. The Enrichment Corp. guarantee is subordinated in right of payment to certain obligations of, and claims against, Enrichment Corp. described in the 8.25% Notes Indenture (collectively, the “Designated Senior Claims”), including obligations and claims:

~~under a future credit facility up to $50 million with a maximum net borrowing of $40 million after taking into account any minimum cash balance;~~

~~under any revolving credit facility to finance inventory purchases and related working capital needs;~~

~~held by or for the benefit of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) pursuant to any settlement (including any required funding of pension plans); and~~

~~under surety bonds or similar obligations held by or on behalf of the U.S. government pursuant to regulatory requirements.~~

The liens securing the Enrichment Corp. guarantee of the 8% PIK Toggle Notes and the 8.25% Notes are pari passu with each other, and are junior in priority with respect to the lien securing Limited Secured Acquisition Debt, which is limited to the assets acquired with such Limited Secured Acquisition Debt.

8% PIK Toggle Notes

Interest on the 8% PIK Toggle Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on March 31 and September 30 based on a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. The principal amount is increased by any payment of interest in the form of PIK payments. The Company has the option to pay up to 5.5% per annum of interest due on the 8% PIK Toggle Notes in the form of PIK payments. For the semi-annual interest periods ended March 31, ~~2017,~~2018 and September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company elected to pay interest in the form of PIK payments at 5.5% per annum.

Financing costs for the issuance of the 8% PIK Toggle Notes were deferred and are being amortized on a straight-line basis, which approximates the effective interest method, over the life of the 8% PIK Toggle Notes.

The 8% PIK Toggle Notes mature on September ~~30,~~20, 2019. However, the maturity date ~~can~~may be extended to September 30, 2024, upon the satisfaction of certain funding conditions described in the Indenture relating to the funding, under binding agreements, of (i) the American Centrifuge project or (ii) the implementation and deployment of a National Security Train Program utilizing American Centrifuge technology.applicable indenture.

~~The 8% PIK Toggle Notes rank equally in right of payment with all existing~~

Additional terms and ~~future unsubordinated indebtedness~~conditions of the ~~Company (other than~~8.25% Notes and the ~~Issuer Senior Debt) and are senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness of the Company. The~~ 8% PIK Toggle Notes are ~~subordinated~~described in ~~right~~Note 9, Debt, of ~~payment to~~ the ~~Issuer Senior Debt.~~audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

The 8% PIK Toggle Notes are guaranteed and secured on a subordinated, conditional, and limited basis by Enrichment Corp. Enrichment Corp. will be released from its guarantee without the consent of the holders of the 8% PIK Toggle Notes upon the occurrence of certain termination events (other than with respect to an unconditional interest claim), including (i) the involuntary termination by the PBGC of any of the qualified pension plans of the Company or Enrichment Corp., (ii) the cessation of funding prior to completion of our ongoing American Centrifuge test programs or (iii) both a decision by the Company to abandon American Centrifuge technology and either (1) the efforts by the Company to commercialize another next generation enrichment technology funded at least in part by new capital provided or to be provided by Enrichment Corp. have been terminated or are no longer being pursued or (2) the attainment of capital necessary to commercialize another next generation enrichment technology with respect to which the Company is involved which does not include new capital provided or to be provided by Enrichment Corp.

The Enrichment Corp. guarantee ranks equally in right of payment with all existing and future unsubordinated indebtedness of Enrichment Corp. (other than Designated Senior Claims and Limited Secured Acquisition Debt) and senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness of Enrichment Corp. and Limited Secured Acquisition Debt. The Enrichment Corp. guarantee is subordinated in right of payment to Designated Senior Claims.

As explained above, the liens securing the Enrichment Corp. guarantee of the 8% PIK Toggle Notes and the 8.25% Notes are pari passu with each other, and are junior in priority with respect to the lien securing Limited Secured Acquisition Debt, which is limited to the assets acquired with such Limited Secured Acquisition Debt.

9.8. FAIR VALUE

Fair value is the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value of assets and liabilities, the following hierarchy is used in selecting inputs, with the highest priority given to Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable:

Level 1 – quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 – quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.

Level 3 – valuations derived using one or more significant inputs that are not observable.

Financial Instruments Recorded at Fair Value (in ~~Millions)~~millions):


	September 30, 2017								December 31, 2016								September 30, 2018								December 31, 2017
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	135.9	$	—	$	—	$	135.9	$	260.7	$	—	$	—	$	260.7	$	124.9	$	—	$	—	$	124.9	$	208.8	$	—	$	—	$	208.8
Deferred compensation asset (a)	1.3		—		—		1.3		1.1		—		—		1.1		1.6		—		—		1.6		1.4		—		—		1.4

Liabilities:
Deferred compensation obligation (a)	1.3		—		—		1.3		1.1		—		—		1.1		$	1.6	$	—	$	—	$	1.6	$	1.4	$	—	$	—	$	1.4


(a)	The deferred compensation obligation represents the balance of deferred compensation plus net investment earnings. The deferred compensation plan is funded through a rabbi trust. Trust funds are invested in mutual funds for which unit prices are quoted in active markets and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.

There were no transfers between Level 1, 2 or 3 during the periods presented.

Other Financial Instruments

As of September 30, ~~2017~~2018, and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the balance sheet carrying amounts for Accounts Receivable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities (excluding the deferred compensation obligation described above), and ~~payables~~Payables under SWU ~~purchase agreements~~Purchase Agreements approximate fair value because of ~~the~~their short-term ~~nature of the instruments.~~nature.

The carrying value and estimated fair value of long-term debt ~~follow~~are as follows (in millions):


	September 30, 2017					December 31, 2016		September 30, 2018					December 31, 2017
	Carrying Value			Estimated Fair Value ^(a)		Carrying Value	Estimated Fair Value ^(a)	Carrying Value			Estimated Fair Value ^(a)		Carrying Value			Estimated Fair Value ^(a)
8.25% Notes	$	138.5	^(b)	$	59.7	-	-	$	126.3	^(b)	$	60.5	$	132.4	^(b)	$	61.7
8% PIK Toggle Notes	31.3			24.0		234.6	107.4	33.0			28.4		31.3			25.1

^(a) Based on the most recent trading price as of the balance sheet date, which is considered a Level 2 input ~~as of September 30, 2017, and a Level 1 input as of December 31, 2016,~~ based on the frequency of trading.


^(b)	The carrying value of the 8.25% Notes ~~as of September 30, 2017,~~ consists of the principal balance of $74.3 million and the sum of current and noncurrent interest payment obligations until maturity. Refer to Note 8,7, Debt.

~~10.~~

9. PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT HEALTH AND LIFE BENEFITS

The components of net periodic benefit ~~cost (credit)~~expense (income) for the defined benefit pension plans ~~were~~are as follows (in millions):


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Service costs	$	0.9		$	1.0		$	2.8		$	2.9		$	0.9		$	0.9		$	2.5		$	2.8
Interest costs	8.0			8.9			24.1			26.6			7.1			8.0			21.5			24.1
Expected gains on plan assets	(10.1		)	(10.6		)	(30.5		)	(31.6		)	(10.3		)	(10.1		)	(30.7		)	(30.5		)
Actuarial loss from remeasurement	—			—			—			0.8
Net periodic benefit credit	$	(1.2	)	$	(0.7	)	$	(3.6	)	$	(1.3	)
Net periodic benefit income													$	(2.3	)	$	(1.2	)	$	(6.7	)	$	(3.6	)

In the second quarter of 2016, the level of lump-sum payments under the non-qualified defined benefit pension plans resulted in the remeasurement of pension obligations under settlement accounting rules. The remeasurement resulted in a loss of $0.8 million included in ~~Selling, General and Administrative Expenses~~ in the second quarter of 2016. The loss includes the effect of a decrease in the discount rate used in the remeasurement of pension obligations from approximately 4.5% as of December 31, 2015, to approximately 3.7% as of June 30, 2016.

The components of net periodic benefit ~~cost~~expense for the postretirement health and life benefit plans ~~were~~are as follows (in millions):

Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Interest costs $ 1.8
$ 2.1
$ 5.4
$ 6.1
Expected gains on plan assets —
(0.1 ) —
(0.2 )
Amortization of prior service credits, net —
(0.1 ) (0.1 ) (0.2 )
Net periodic benefit cost $ 1.8
$ 1.9
$ 5.3
$ 5.7



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018		2017		2018			2017
Interest costs	$	1.5	$	1.8	$	4.4		$	5.4
Amortization of prior service credits	—		—		(0.1		)	(0.1		)
Net periodic benefit expense	$	1.5	$	1.8	$	4.3		$	5.3

The Company reports service costs for its defined benefit pension plans and its postretirement health and life benefit plans in Cost of Sales and Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The remaining components of net periodic benefit expense (income) are reported as Nonoperating Components of Net Periodic Benefit Expense (Income).

~~11.~~10. NET ~~INCOME (LOSS)~~LOSS PER COMMON SHARE

Basic net income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing income (loss) allocable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. In calculating diluted net income (loss) per common share, the number of shares is increased by the weighted average number of potential shares related to stock compensation awards. No dilutive effect is recognized in a period in which a net loss has occurred. The weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted income (loss) per common share are as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Net loss allocable to common stockholders (in millions)	$	(10.5	)	$	(41.3	)	$	(28.3	)	$	(58.8	)
Numerator (in millions):
Net loss													$	(7.8	)	$	(8.5	)	$	(58.9	)	$	(23.3	)
Preferred stock dividends - undeclared and cumulative													1.9			2.0			5.9			5.0
Net loss allocable to common stockholders													$	(9.7	)	$	(10.5	)	$	(64.8	)	$	(28.3	)

Shares in thousands:
Denominator (in thousands):
Average common shares outstanding - basic	9,103			9,096			9,081			9,102			9,133			9,103			9,118			9,081
Potentially dilutive shares related to stock options (a)	—			—			—			—
Potentially dilutive shares related to stock options and restricted stock units^(a)													—			—			—			—
Average common shares outstanding - diluted	9,103			9,096			9,081			9,102			9,133			9,103			9,118			9,081

Net loss per common share – basic and diluted	$	(1.15	)	$	(4.54	)	$	(3.12	)	$	(6.46	)
Net loss per common share (in dollars) - basic and diluted:													$	(1.06	)	$	(1.15	)	$	(7.11	)	$	(3.12	)

(a) Common stock equivalents excluded from the diluted calculation as a result of a net loss in the period (in thousands)	13			14			60			7			3			13			10			60

Options outstanding and considered anti-dilutive as their exercise price exceeded the average share market price (in thousands)	327			375			30			490			360			327			360			30

~~12.~~11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

~~American Centrifuge~~Commitments under SWU Purchase Agreements

TENEX

A major supplier of SWU to the Company is the Russian government entity Joint Stock Company “TENEX” (“TENEX”). Under a 2011 agreement with TENEX, as amended, (the “Russian Supply Agreement”), the Company purchases SWU contained in LEU received from TENEX, and the Company delivers natural uranium to TENEX for the LEU’s uranium component. The LEU that the Company obtains from TENEX under the agreement is subject to quotas and other restrictions applicable to commercial Russian LEU. The Company may reschedule SWU quantities scheduled for purchase through 2022 into the period 2023–2026, in return for the purchase of additional SWU in those years. Depending on the total purchase obligations rescheduled to 2023–2026, the Company may defer certain limited quantities beyond 2026.

The Russian Supply Agreement provides that the Company must pay for all SWU in its minimum purchase obligation each year, even if it fails to submit orders for such SWU. The Company would then have the right to take the unordered SWU in the following year. Pricing terms for SWU under the Russian Supply Agreement are based on a mix of market-related price points and other factors. This formula is subject to an adjustment that the Company anticipates will reduce the unit costs of SWU under this contract beginning in 2019.

Orano

On April 27, 2018, the Company entered into a long-term agreement (the “Orano Supply Agreement”) with Orano Cycle (formerly, AREVA NC) (“Orano”) for the long-term supply to the Company of SWU contained in LEU, nominally commencing in 2023. Under the Agreement, the Company purchases SWU contained in LEU received from Orano, and the Company delivers natural uranium to Orano for the natural uranium feed material component of LEU. The Company may elect to begin to accept deliveries as early as 2021 or to defer the commencement of purchases until 2024 and has the option to extend the six-year purchase period for an additional two (2) years. The Orano Supply Agreement provides significant flexibility to adjust purchase volumes, subject to annual minimums and maximums in fixed amounts that vary year by year. The pricing for the SWU purchased by the Company is determined by a formula that uses a combination of market-related price points and other factors, and is subject to certain floors and ceilings. Prices are payable in a combination of U.S. dollars and euros.

U.S. imports of LEU from France are currently subject to an antidumping order that will remain in effect through at least the second quarter of 2019. Under the terms of the Orano Supply Agreement, Orano will have the right to partially limit the amount of LEU that can be delivered in the United States for so long as the LEU is subject to the antidumping order.

Milestones Under the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement

The Company and DOE signed an agreement dated June 17, 2002, as amended (the “2002 DOE-USEC Agreement”), pursuant to which the parties made long-term commitments directed at resolving issues related to the stability and security of the domestic uranium enrichment industry. DOE consented to the assumption by Centrus of the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement and other agreements between the Company and DOE subject to an express reservation of all rights, remedies and defenses by DOE and Centrus under those agreements as part of the Company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy process. The 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement requires Centrus to develop, demonstrate and deploy advanced enrichment technology in accordance with milestones and provides for remedies in the event of a failure to meet a milestone under certain circumstances.

DOE has specific remedies under the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement if Centrus fails to meet a milestone that would adversely impact its ability to begin commercial operations of the American Centrifuge Plant on schedule, and such delay was within Centrus’ control or was due to its fault or negligence or if Centrus abandons or constructively abandons the commercial deployment of an advanced enrichment technology. These remedies include terminating the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement, revoking Centrus’ access to DOE’s centrifuge technology that is required for the success of the American Centrifuge project, requiring Centrus to transfer certain rights in the American Centrifuge technology and facilities to DOE, and requiring Centrus to reimburse DOE for certain costs associated with the American Centrifuge project.

The 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement provides that if a delaying event beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Centrus occurs that could affect Centrus’ ability to meet an American Centrifuge Plant milestone, DOE and Centrus will jointly meet to discuss in good faith possible adjustments to the milestones as appropriate to accommodate the delaying event. The Company notified DOE that it had not met the June 2014 milestone within the time period provided due to events beyond its control and without the fault or negligence of the Company. The assumption of the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement provided for under the Plan of Reorganization did not affect the ability of either party to assert all rights, remedies and defenses under the agreement and all such rights, remedies and defenses are specifically preserved and all time limits tolled expressly including all rights, remedies and defenses and time limits relating to any missed milestones. DOE and Centrus have agreed that all rights, remedies and defenses of the parties with respect to any missed milestones since March 5, 2014, including the June 2014 and November 2014 milestones, and all other matters under the 2002 DOE-USEC Agreement ~~continued~~continue to be preserved, and that the time limits for each party to respond to any missed milestones continue to be tolled.

~~Piketon Facility Costs and D&D Obligations~~Legal Matters

Effective October 1, 2015, the U.S. government discontinued funding of the American Centrifuge demonstration cascade at Piketon. Funding for American Centrifuge is now limited to research and development work at the Company’s facilities in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. As a result of reduced program funding, Centrus incurred a special charge in the third quarter of 2015 for estimated employee termination benefits, and began reductions in force. Refer to Note ~~2, Special Charges~~14, Subsequent Event,, for ~~details. Centrus began to incur expenditures~~information on legal proceedings in which the ~~second quarter of 2016 associated with the D&D~~Company is involved. See also Legal Proceedings under Part I, Item 3 of the ~~Piketon facility in accordance with the requirements of the NRC and DOE. Centrus leases the Piketon facility from DOE. At the conclusion of the lease~~Company’s Annual Report on ~~June 30, 2019, without mutual agreement between Centrus and DOE regarding other possible uses~~Form 10-K for the facility, Centrus is obligated to return the facility to DOE in a condition that meets NRC requirements and in the same condition as the facility was in when it was leased to Centrus (other than due to normal wear and tear). Centrus must remove all Company-owned capital improvements at the Piketon facility, unless otherwise consented to by DOE, by the conclusion of the lease term. The D&D work is expected to extend through 2017 and be substantially completed by year-end. As of September 30, 2017, Centrus has accrued $16.6 million on the balance sheet as ~~Decontamination and Decommissioning Obligations~~ ~~for the estimated fair value of the remaining costs to complete the D&D work.~~year ended December 31, 2017.

Centrus is ~~required~~subject to ~~provide financial assurance to the NRC~~various legal proceedings and DOE for D&D costs under a regulatorily-prescribed methodology that includes potential contingent costs and reserves. As of September 30, 2017, Centrus has provided financial assurance to the NRC and DOEclaims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ~~form~~ordinary course of ~~surety bonds~~business. While the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, other than the above, Centrus does not believe that ~~are fully~~the outcome of any of these legal matters, individually and in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its cash ~~collateralized by Centrus for $29.6 million. Centrus expects to receive cash when surety bonds are reduced and/~~flows, results of operations or ~~cancelled as the Company fulfills its D&D and lease obligations.~~consolidated financial condition.

Centrus has received state economic incentives in exchange for commitments by the Company to make investments in capital improvements and employee training. Should the commitments under the incentive agreements not be met, the Company may be required to repay a portion of the state incentives.

~~13.~~12. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Series B Preferred Stock

On February 14, 2017, Centrus issued 104,574 shares of Series B Preferred Stock as part of the securities exchange described in Note 8,7, Debt. The issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock was a non-cash financing transaction. The Series B Preferred Stock has a par value of $1.00 per share and a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share (the “Liquidation Preference”). The Series B Preferred Stock is recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at fair value less transaction costs, or $4.6 million, as of September 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017.

Holders of the Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to cumulative dividends of 7.5% per annum of the Liquidation Preference. Centrus is obligated to pay cash dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock in an amount equal to the Liquidation Preference to the extent that dividends are declared by the Board and:


(a)	its pension plans and United States Enrichment ~~Corp.’s~~Corporation’s pension plans are at least 90% funded on a variable rate premium calculation in the current plan year;


(b)	its net income calculated in accordance with GAAP (excluding the effect of pension remeasurement) for the immediately preceding fiscal quarter exceeds $7.5 million;


(c)	its free cash flow (defined as the sum of cash provided by (used in) operating activities and cash provided by (used in) investing activities) for the immediately preceding four fiscal quarters exceeds $35 million;


(d)	the balance of cash and cash equivalents calculated in accordance with GAAP on the last day of the immediately preceding quarter would exceed $150 million after pro forma application of the dividend payment; and


(e)	dividends may be legally paid under Delaware law.

Centrus has not met these criteria for the periods from issuance through September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, and has not declared, accrued or paid dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. Dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock are cumulative to the extent not paid at any quarter-end, whether or not declared and whether or not there are assets of the Company legally available for the payment of such dividends in whole or in part. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Series B Preferred Stock has an aggregate liquidation preference of ~~$109.6~~$117.4 million including accumulated dividends of ~~$5.0~~$12.8 million. As of December 31, 2017, the Series B Preferred Stock had an aggregate liquidation preference of $111.5 million, including accumulated dividends of $6.9 million.

Outstanding shares of the Series B Senior Preferred Stock are redeemable at the Company’s option, in whole or in part, for an amount of cash equal to the Liquidation Preference, plus an amount equal to the accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, whether or not declared, through date of redemption.

Rights Agreement

On April 6, 2016 (the “Effective Date”), the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) adopted a Section 382 Rights Agreement (the “Rights Agreement”). The Board adopted the Rights Agreement in an effort to protect shareholder value by, among other things, attempting to protect against a possible limitation on the Company’s ability to use its net operating loss carryforwards and other tax benefits, which may be used to reduce potential future income tax obligations. As reported on the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company had federal net operating losses of ~~$725.8~~$789.7 million as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, that currently expire through ~~2036.~~2037.

In connection with the adoption of the Rights Agreement, the Board declared a dividend of one preferred-share-purchase-right for each share of the Company’s Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock outstanding as of the Effective Date. The rights initially trade together with the common stock and are not exercisable. In the absence of further action by the Board, the rights would generally become exercisable and allow a holder to acquire shares of a new series of the Company’s preferred stock if any person or group acquires 4.99% or more of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock, or if a person or group that already owns 4.99% or more of the

Company’s Class A Common Stock acquires additional shares representing 0.5% or more of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Class A Common Stock. The rights beneficially owned by the acquirer would become null and void, resulting in significant dilution in the ownership interest of such acquirer.

The Board may exempt any acquisition of the Company’s common stock from the provisions of the Rights Agreement if it determines that doing so would not jeopardize or endanger the Company’s use of its tax assets or is otherwise in the best interests of the Company. The Board also has the ability to amend or terminate the Rights Agreement prior to a triggering event.

Effective on February 14, 2017, in connection with the settlement and completion of the exchange offer and consent solicitation, the Company amended the Rights Agreement solely to exclude acquisitions of the Series B Preferred Stock issued as part of the exchange offer and consent solicitation from the definition of “Common Shares.”

The Company’s stockholders approved the Rights Agreement at the 2017 annual meeting of stockholders on May 31, 2017. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with the Rights Agreement, the rights issued under the Rights Agreement expire on April 6, 2019.

~~Stock-Based Compensation~~

~~A summary of stock-based compensation costs follows (in millions):~~

Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016

Total stock-based compensation costs:
Restricted stock units $ —
$ —
$ —
$ 0.1
Stock options 0.1
0.1
0.3
0.3
Expense included in selling, general and administrative expense $ 0.1
$ 0.1
$ 0.3
$ 0.4

Total recognized tax benefit $ —
$ —
$ —
$ —

As of September 30, 2017, there was $0.5 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock-based payments granted, of which $0.4 million relates to stock options and $0.1 million relates to unvested restricted stock units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.2 years.

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. Stock options vest and become exercisable in equal annual installments over a three- or four-year period and expire 10 years from the date of grant.

~~Assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value option grants follow. There were no option grants in the nine months ended September 30, 2017.~~



	~~Nine Months Ended~~ ~~September 30, 2016~~
~~Risk-free interest rate~~	~~1.9%~~
~~Expected volatility~~	~~75%~~
~~Expected option life (years)~~	6
~~Weighted-average grant date fair value~~	~~$1.77~~
~~Options granted (in thousands)~~	15

A total of 30,000 restricted stock units were issued to non-employee, independent members of the Board of Directors in the nine months ended September 30, 2017, including 5,000 restricted stock units in the three months ended September 30, 2017. The restricted stock units vest on the earlier of May 31, 2018, or the date of the 2018 Annual Meeting, absent a defined event that would accelerate vesting. Settlement of restricted stock units is made in shares of Class A Common Stock only upon the director’s retirement or other end of service.

Shares Outstanding

A total of 38,751 shares of Class A Common Stock were issued in settlement of vested restricted stock units to three former members of the Board of Directors following the end of their service on May 31, 2017.

Shares of Class B Common Stock that are sold in the market are converted to shares of Class A Common Stock. In the nine months ended September 30, 2017, a total of 30,318 shares of Class B Common Stock were sold in the market and converted to shares of Class A Common Stock as of September 30, 2017.

Changes in the number of shares outstanding ~~follow:~~are as follows:


	Preferred Stock, Series B	Common Stock, Class A	Common Stock, Class B		Preferred Stock, Series B	Common Stock, Class A	Common Stock, Class B

Balance at December 31, 2015	—	7,563,600	1,436,400
Balance at September 30, 2016	—	7,563,600	1,436,400

Balance at December 31, 2016	—	7,563,600	1,436,400		—	7,563,600	1,436,400
Issuance of Preferred Stock	104,574	—	—		104,574	—	—
Issuance of Class A Common Stock	—	38,751	—		—	38,751	—
Conversion of Common Stock from Class B to Class A	—	30,318	(30,318	)	—	28,018	(28,018	)
Balance at September 30, 2017	104,574	7,632,669	1,406,082		104,574	7,630,369	1,408,382

Balance at December 31, 2017 and September 30, 2018					104,574	7,632,669	1,406,082

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The sole component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) relates to activity in the accounting for pension and postretirement health and life benefit plans. Amortization of prior service credits is reclassified from AOCI and included in the computation of net periodic benefit ~~cost~~expense as detailed in Note ~~10,~~9, Pension and ~~Post-Retirement~~Postretirement Health and Life Benefits.

~~14.~~13. SEGMENT INFORMATION

Centrus has two reportable segments: the LEU segment with two components, SWU and uranium, and the contract services segment. The LEU segment includes sales of the SWU component of LEU, sales of both the SWU and uranium components of LEU, and sales of uranium. The contract services segment includes revenue and cost of sales for work that Centrus performs under a fixed-price agreement as a contractor to UT-Battelle. The contract services segment also includes limited services provided by Centrus to DOE and its contractors at the Piketon facility. Gross profit is Centrus’ measure for segment reporting. There were no intersegment sales in the periods presented. ~~For~~Refer to Note 2, Revenue Recognition and Contracts with Customers, for additional details on revenue for each segment. The following table presents the Company’s segment ~~refer to Item 2,~~ ~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~.information (in millions):


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016			2017			2016		Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	(in millions)										2018			2017		2018			2017
Revenue
LEU segment:
LEU Segment:
Separative work units	$	43.5	$	14.1		$	82.2		$	128.3	$	17.6		$	43.5	$	68.2		$	82.2
Uranium	—		—			—			14.3		11.3			—		14.9			—
	43.5		14.1			82.2			142.6
Contract services segment	6.8		7.3			19.3			32.2
Revenue	$	50.3	$	21.4		$	101.5		$	174.8
Total											28.9			43.5		83.1			82.2
Contract Services Segment											5.2			6.8		26.1			19.3
Total revenue											$	34.1		$	50.3	$	109.2		$	101.5

Segment Gross Profit (Loss)
LEU segment	$	11.1	$	(1.8	)	$	5.4		$	11.9
Contract services segment	0.5		(0.3		)	(0.6		)	7.3
LEU Segment											$	8.0		$	10.8	$	(15.5	)	$	4.3
Contract Services Segment											(0.2		)	0.5		7.3			(0.6		)
Gross profit (loss)	$	11.6	$	(2.1	)	$	4.8		$	19.2	$	7.8		$	11.3	$	(8.2	)	$	3.7

14. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

On October 11, 2018, the Company’s subsidiaries, United States Enrichment Corporation (“Enrichment”) and American Centrifuge Enrichment, LLC (“ACE”, together with Enrichment, the “Company Subsidiaries”) filed proofs of claim in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio (the “Bankruptcy Court”) against each of FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (“FENOC”), FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation, LLC (“FENG,” and together with FENOC, the “FirstEnergy Contract Parties”), FirstEnergy Solutions Corp. (“FES”) and FirstEnergy Generation, LLC (“FG”) in the amount of approximately $314 million. The claims relate to damages arising from the rejection and breach of a long-term contract between the Company Subsidiaries and the FirstEnergy Contract Parties that was approved by the Bankruptcy Court and made effective as of July 26, 2018. The proofs of claim filed by the Company Subsidiaries include claims against FENOC and FENG based on their liability as parties to the contract that was rejected and breached. The proofs of claim filed by the Company Subsidiaries also include claims against FES and FG based on their liability under guaranties they issued that may obligate FES and FG to satisfy the rejection and breach of contract damages claims. No amounts have been recorded in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements related to the claims.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report.

Overview

Centrus Energy Corp. (“Centrus” or the “Company”) is a trusted supplier of ~~low-enriched uranium (“LEU”)~~nuclear fuel and services for ~~commercial~~the nuclear power ~~plants.~~industry. References to “Centrus”, the “Company”, or “we” include Centrus Energy Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiaries as well as the predecessor to Centrus, unless the context otherwise indicates.

Our primary business involves the sale of low-enriched uranium (“LEU”) or its components and natural uranium to utilities operating commercial nuclear power plants. LEU is a critical component in the production of nuclear fuel for reactors that produce electricity. We have been expanding our business offerings by providing technical, engineering and manufacturing services to commercial and government customers, including performing decontamination and decommissioning work for the U.S. government and advanced engineering and manufacturing services to the nuclear industry.

We supply LEU to both domestic and international utilities for use in nuclear reactors worldwide. We provide LEU from multiple sources including our inventory, medium- and long- term supply contracts, and spot purchases. As a long-term supplier of LEU to our customers, our objective is to provide value through the reliability and diversity of our supply sources. Our long-term goal is to resume commercial enrichment production, and we are actively exploring approaches to that end.

With our multi-decade experience in uranium enrichment, we continue to be a leader in the development of advanced uranium enrichment ~~technology and~~technology. We are performing research and demonstration work on our advanced centrifuge technology to support U.S. energy and national security through our contract with UT-Battelle, LLC (“UT-Battelle”), the ~~operator~~management and operating contractor of Oak Ridge National Laboratory (“ORNL”).

As a long-term supplier of LEU to our customers, our goal is to provide value through the reliability and diversity of our supply sources. We provide LEU from multiple sources including our inventory, long- and mid-term supply contracts and spot purchases. Our long-term objective is to resume commercial enrichment production and we are exploring alternative approaches to that end.

~~We have a contract with UT-Battelle to conduct research and development of our advanced centrifuge technology~~ for the U.S. ~~government.~~Department of Energy (“DOE”). We believe that this technology could play a critical role in meeting ~~our~~U.S. national and energy security needs and ~~achieving~~advancing our nation’s ~~non-proliferation~~nonproliferation objectives.

The nuclear industry in general, and the nuclear fuel industry in particular, is in a period of significant change, which ~~could significantly transform~~continues to affect the competitive landscape ~~Centrus faces.~~we face. The nuclear fuel ~~cycle~~ industry remains oversupplied, creating downward pressures on ~~commodity~~ pricing, with uncertainty regarding the timing of industry expansion globally. Nuclear generators in some parts of the world, including the U.S., are under pressure from changes in electricity demand and the effects of new, lower cost sources of electricity generation in their markets. Changes in the competitive landscape may adversely affect pricing trends, change customer spending patterns, ~~demand for fuel, and financial conditions, and otherwise~~or create uncertainty. ~~These changes may affect the company’s existing contracts and its ability to obtain new contracts.~~ To address these changes, we ~~may seek~~have adjusted and will continue to ~~adjust~~address our cost structure and operations and may evaluate opportunities to grow our business organically or through acquisitions and other strategic transactions.

We are working to leverage our unique technical expertise and facilities to support leading companies in the nuclear industry, including supporting development of advanced nuclear reactors and related industries, as well as supporting the U.S. government. Our experience developing, licensing and manufacturing advanced nuclear technologies positions us to provide critical design, engineering, manufacturing and other services to a broad range of potential clients, including those involving sensitive or classified technologies. We are providing design, engineering and manufacturing services to government and commercial customers, including performing decontamination and decommissioning (“D&D”) work for the U.S. government, and performing design, engineering, manufacturing and licensing services support for advanced reactors and fuel fabrication.

We are also actively considering, and expect to consider from time to time in the future, potential strategic transactions, which could involve, without limitation, acquisitions and/or dispositions of businesses or ~~assets,~~assets. These transactions could also involve joint ventures or investments in businesses, products or technologies. In connection with any such transaction, we may seek additional debt or equity financing, contribute or dispose of assets, assume additional indebtedness, or partner with other parties to consummate a transaction.

~~Business Segments~~

Revenue

~~Centrus has~~We have two reportable segments: the LEU ~~segment with two components, separative work units (“SWU”) and uranium,~~Segment and the ~~contract services segment.~~

~~LEU Segment~~

~~Revenue from Sales of SWU and Uranium~~

Contract Services Segment. The LEU ~~segment~~Segment is currently our primary business focus. Revenue from our LEU ~~segment~~Segment is derived primarily from:

sales of the SWU component of LEU,

sales of both the SWU and uranium components of LEU, and

sales of natural uranium.

Our Contract Services Segment reflects our technical, manufacturing and engineering services offered to public and private sector customers, including engineering and testing activities as well as technical and resource support currently being performed by the Company.

SWU and Uranium Sales

Revenue ~~for~~from our LEU ~~segment~~Segment accounted for approximately ~~88%~~89% of our total revenue in ~~2016.~~2017. The majority of our customers are domestic and international utilities that operate nuclear power plants, with international sales constituting approximately ~~25-40%~~25% to 45% of revenue from our LEU ~~segment~~Segment in recent years. Our agreements with electric utilities are primarily long-term, fixed-commitment contracts under which our customers are obligated to purchase a specified quantity of the SWU component of LEU (or the SWU and uranium components of LEU) from us. Our agreements for natural uranium sales are generally shorter-term, fixed-commitment contracts.

Our revenues, operating results and cash flows can fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year. Revenue is recognized at the time LEU or uranium is delivered under the terms of our contracts. The timing of customer demand is affected by, among other things, electricity markets, reactor operations, maintenance and refueling outages, and customer inventories. In the current market environment, some customers are building inventories and may choose to take deliveries under annual purchase obligations later in the year. Customer payments for the SWU component of LEU average ~~roughly $10-15~~generally $10 million to $15 million per order. As a result, a relatively small change in the timing of customer orders for LEU may cause significant variability in operating results.

Utility customers in general have the option to defer physical receipt of LEU or uranium purchased from Centrus beyond the contractual sale period. In such cases, title to LEU or uranium is transferred to the customer and a performance obligation for Centrus is created and a receivable is recorded. Cash is collected for the receivable under normal credit terms. The performance obligation is represented as ~~Deferred Revenue~~ ~~on the balance sheet and the customer-titled product is classified as~~ ~~Deferred Costs Associated with Deferred Revenue~~. Risk of loss remains with Centrus until physical delivery occurs. The recognition of revenue and related cost of sales occurs at the time physical delivery occurs and risk of loss transfers to the customer. The timing of physical delivery, subject to notice period, ~~requirements, is at the option of the customer. Deferred revenue and deferred cost activity~~resulting in the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017, follows:~~deferral of costs and revenue recognition. Refer to

(in millions) Deferred Revenue Deferred Cost Gross Profit Deferred or (Recognized) Margin

Balance at December 31, 2016 $ 123.6
$ 89.3
$ 34.3
28%
Deferred sales in the period 66.4
44.9
21.5
32%
Previously deferred sales recognized in the period (58.3 ) (39.7 ) (18.6 ) 32%
Balance at September 30, 2017 $ 131.7
$ 94.5
$ 37.2
28%

Note 2, Revenue Recognition and Contracts with Customers, in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further details.

Our financial performance over time can be significantly affected by changes in prices for SWU and uranium. Since 2011, market prices for SWU and uranium have significantly declined. Since our sales order book includes contracts awarded to us in previous years, the average SWU price billed to customers typically lags behind published price indicators by several years, which means that average prices under contract today exceed current market prices. The long-term SWU price indicator, as published by TradeTech, LLC in Nuclear Market Review, is an indication of base-year prices under new long-term enrichment contracts in our primary markets. The following chart summarizes TradeTech’s long-term and spot SWU price indicators, the long-term price for natural uranium hexafluoride (“UF6”), as calculated by Centrus using indicators published in Nuclear Market Review, and TradeTech’s spot price indicator for UF6:

SWU and Uranium Market Price ~~Indicators~~Indicators*

* Source: Nuclear Market Review, a TradeTech publication, www.uranium.com

Our contracts with customers ~~and suppliers~~ are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars, and although revenue has not been directly affected by changes in the foreign exchange rate of the U.S. dollar, we may have a competitive price advantage or disadvantage obtaining new contracts in a competitive bidding process depending upon the weakness or strength of the U.S. dollar. Costs of our primary competitors are denominated in other currencies. Our contracts with suppliers have historically been denominated in U.S. dollars. On April 27, 2018, we entered into an agreement with Orano Cycle (formerly, AREVA NC) for the long-term supply of SWU. We may elect to begin deliveries as early as 2021. Purchases will be payable in a combination of U.S dollars and euros and we may be subject to exchange rate risk for the portion of purchases payable in euros.

On occasion, ~~Centrus~~we will accept payment in the form of uranium. Revenue from the sale of SWU under such contracts is recognized at the time LEU is delivered and is based on the fair value of the uranium ~~received in exchange for~~at contract inception, or as the ~~SWU.~~

~~Cost~~quantity of ~~Sales for SWU and Uranium~~uranium is finalized, if variable.

Cost of sales for SWU and uranium is based on the amount of SWU and uranium sold and delivered during the period and unit inventory costs. Unit inventory costs are determined using the monthly moving average cost method. Changes in purchase costs have an effect on inventory costs and cost of sales over current and future periods. Cost of sales includes costs for inventory management at off-site licensed locations. Cost of sales also includes certain legacy costs related to former employees of the Portsmouth and Paducah gaseous diffusion plants. Actuarial gains and losses related to the retiree benefit plans are recognized immediately in the statements of operations when plan obligations are remeasured at year-end or when lump-sum payments reach certain levels.

Contract Services ~~Segment~~

~~The contract~~Our Contract Services Segment reflects our technical, manufacturing and engineering services ~~segment includes revenue~~offered to public and ~~cost of sales for~~private sector customers, including the American Centrifuge ~~work~~engineering and testing activities we perform as a contractor for UT-Battelle. With our private sector customers, we seek to ~~UT-Battelle. Direct costs incurred in performing~~leverage our domestic enrichment experience and engineering know-how to assist customers with a range of engineering and advanced manufacturing projects including the ~~contract work are consistent with~~production of fuel for next-generation nuclear reactors and the ~~funding levels. Centrus records an unbilled receivable and revenue based on the progress towards the achievement~~development of monthly deliverables. Monthly reports and invoices affirming the achievement of monthly deliverables are submitted shortly following each month. The achievement of monthly deliverables has resulted in revenue consistent with the funding levels. The contract services segment also includes limited services provided by Centrus to the U.S. Department of Energy (“DOE”) and its contractors at the Piketon facility. related facilities.

American Centrifuge

~~The Company has~~We have a long record as a global leader in advanced technology, manufacturing and engineering. Our manufacturing, engineering and testing facilities and our highly-trained workforce are deeply engaged in advancing the next generation of uranium enrichment technology. We are exploring a number of options for returning to domestic production in the future.

In September 2015, Centrus completed a successful three-year demonstration of the existing American Centrifuge technology at its facility in Piketon, Ohio, with 120 machines linked together in a cascade to simulate industrial operating conditions. Since then ourOur government contracts with UT-Battelle ~~have provided~~provide for ~~continued~~ engineering and testing work on the American Centrifuge technology at ~~the Company’s~~our facilities in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Our recently completed contract with UT-Battelle ~~(the “2017~~was for the period from October 1, 2017, through September 30, 2018, and generated total revenue of approximately $16.0 million upon completion of defined milestones. The ORNL ~~Contract”)~~contracts have been funded incrementally. Funding for the American Centrifuge program was provided to UT-Battelle by the federal government. Our previous contract with UT-Battelle was for the period from October 1, 2016, through September 30, 2017, and generated revenue of approximately ~~$25~~$25.0 million. ~~On October 26, 2017,~~Although the ~~parties executed a new fixed priced~~most recent contract ~~for the period from October 1, 2017, through~~expired September 30, 2018, we continue to perform work towards the expected milestones as the parties work toward a successor agreement. However, we have no assurance that is expected to generate total revenue of approximately $16 million upon completion of defined milestones. The ORNL contracts have been funded incrementally. Funding for the program is provided to UT-Battelle by the U.S. government which is currently operating under a ~~continuing resolution.~~successor agreement will be executed.

American Centrifuge expenses that are outside of our contracts with UT-Battelle are included in Advanced Technology License and Decommissioning Costs, on the consolidated statement of operations, including ongoing costs for work related to ~~maintain~~ the ~~demobilized Piketon facility~~U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) license and ~~our NRC licenses at that location. In~~ the ~~second quarter of 2016, the Company commenced with the decontamination and decommissioning (“D&D”) of~~DOE lease for the Piketon ~~facility in accordance with~~facility. The lease expires on June 30, 2019, absent any mutual agreement between us and DOE regarding other possible uses for the ~~requirements of the NRC and DOE. For additional details on costs, schedule and accrued liabilities related to~~Piketon facility. Centrus commenced the D&D of the Piketon facility ~~refer~~in 2016 and we believe the D&D work required under NRC license requirements has been completed. As of September 30, 2018, we have remaining accrued liabilities of $1.6 million for lease turnover obligations and $3.2 million for termination benefits related to the Piketon facility. In addition, we anticipate incurring expenses of approximately $10 million from the fourth quarter of 2018 through the second quarter of 2019 to continue to maintain the lease facilities in accordance with the lease.

X-energy

On March 26, 2018, we entered into the ~~Results of Operations~~Services Agreement to Provide Technical and Resource Support ~~below and~~ ~~American Centrifuge - Piketon Facility Costs and D&D Obligations~~ in ~~Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies,~~, effective March 26, 2018, with X Energy, LLC (“X-energy”). Under the terms of the ~~condensed consolidated financial statements.~~services agreement, we will provide (i) technical and resource support to X-energy for criticality safety evaluation of processing equipment, design of fresh fuel transport packages, and conceptual mock-up of a nuclear fuel production facility and (ii) non-cash in-kind contributions to X-energy subject to a cooperative agreement between X-energy and the U.S. government. The technical and resource support provided by us to X-energy will be performed pursuant to separate task orders issued under and pursuant to the services agreement.

The initial task orders run through December 31, 2018. The awarding of any additional task orders to us will be dependent upon the receipt of additional funding.

Depending upon the pricing outlined in the task orders, payment for work performed by us pursuant to the services agreement will either be fixed price based or time-and-materials based. The initial task orders in 2018 provide for time-and-materials based pricing with payments to be made to us totaling approximately $4.4 million with the value of our non-cash in-kind contributions expected to be approximately $2.5 million.

Department of Energy

On September 27, 2018, we entered into an agreement pursuant to our lease with DOE to decontaminate and decommission the K-1600 facilities located at the East Tennessee Technology Park. Under the terms of the agreement, we will remove and dispose of government owned materials and equipment in order to render the facility non-contaminated and un-classified.

The work to be performed is expected to be completed by September 30, 2019. The contract is a cost-plus fixed fee contract totaling approximately $15 million. The contract is incrementally funded and subject to appropriations by the federal government.

Site Services Work ~~and Related Receivables~~

We formerly performed sites services work under contracts with DOE and its contractors ~~to maintain and prepare~~at the former Portsmouth ~~Gaseous Diffusion Plant (the “Portsmouth GDP”)~~and Paducah gaseous diffusion plants. On January 11, 2018, we entered into a settlement agreement with DOE and the U.S. government regarding breach of contract claims relating to this work. Refer to Note 2, Revenue Recognition and Contracts with Customers.

The Company and DOE have yet to fully settle the Company’s claims for ~~D&D. In September 2011, our contracts~~reimbursements for ~~maintaining~~certain pension and postretirement benefits costs related to past contract work performed at the Portsmouth ~~facilities~~ and performing services for DOE at Portsmouth expired and we completed the transition of facilities to DOE’s D&D contractor for the Portsmouth site. Additionally, we provided limited services to DOE and its contractors at the Paducah ~~Gaseous Diffusion Plant (the “Paducah GDP”) until the leased portions of the Paducah GDP were returned to DOE on October 21, 2014.~~

sites. There is the potential for additional revenue to be recognized ~~based on~~for this work pending the outcome of ~~DOE reviews~~legal proceedings related to the Company’s claims for payment and ~~audits, as~~ the ~~result of the~~potential release of previously established receivable related reserves. However, uncertainty exists because contract billing periods since June 2002 have not been finalized with DOE, and we have not yet recognized this additional revenue. Certain receivables from DOE are included in other long-term assets basedvaluation allowances on ~~the extended timeframe expected to resolve claims for payment. Additional details are provided in~~ ~~Note 4, Receivables~~ ~~to the condensed consolidated financial statements.~~

receivables.

~~2017~~2018 Outlook

We continue to anticipate SWU and uranium revenue in ~~2017~~2018 in a range of $150 million to $175 million and total revenue in a range of $175 million to $200 ~~million, reflecting an expected decline in SWU and uranium volumes delivered compared to 2016. We anticipate total~~million. Consistent with prior years, revenue ~~in a range of $200 million to $225 million. Our revenues continue~~continues to be most heavily weighted to the fourth ~~quarter, and~~quarter; we expect ~~more than~~nearly one-half of our ~~annual~~2018 revenue to be generated in the fourth ~~quarter of 2017, compared to 44% in the fourth quarter of 2016.~~quarter. We expect to end ~~2017~~2018 with a cash and cash equivalents balance in a range of ~~$150~~$100 million to ~~$175~~$125 million.

Our financial guidance is subject to a number of assumptions and uncertainties that could affect results either positively or negatively. Variations from our expectations could cause differences between our guidance and our ultimate results. Among the factors that could affect our results are:

Additional short-term purchases or sales of SWU and uranium;

Timing of customer orders, related deliveries, and purchases of LEU or components;

The outcome of legal proceedings and other contingencies;

Potential use of cash for strategic initiatives;

Actions taken by our customers, including actions that might affect our existing contracts, as a result of market and other conditions impacting our customers and the industry; and

~~Additional costs~~Timing of return of cash collateral supporting financial assurance.

See also “Forward Looking Statements” earlier in this report for ~~decontamination and decommissioning of the Company’s facility in Ohio.~~additional information.

Results of Operations

Basis of Presentation

On January 1, 2018, we adopted several new accounting standards and certain prior period amounts have been recast to conform with the current presentation. For the adoption of the new revenue standard using the modified retrospective method, results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018, are presented under the new guidance, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the previous guidance. Refer to Note 1, Basis of Presentation, to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further details.

Segment Information

The following tables present elements of the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations that are categorized by segment (dollar amounts in millions):


	Three Months Ended September 30,										Three Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016			$ Change			% Change		2018			2017		$ Change			% Change
LEU segment
LEU Segment
Revenue:
SWU revenue	$	43.5	$	14.1		$	29.4		209	%	$	17.6		$	43.5	$	(25.9	)	(60	)%
Uranium revenue	—		—			—			–		11.3			—		11.3			–
Total	43.5		14.1			29.4			209	%	28.9			43.5		(14.6		)	(34	)%
Cost of sales	32.4		15.9			(16.5		)	(104	)%	20.9			32.7		11.8			36	%
Gross profit (loss)	$	11.1	$	(1.8	)	$	12.9		717	%
Gross profit											$	8.0		$	10.8	$	(2.8	)

Contract services segment
Contract Services Segment
Revenue	$	6.8	$	7.3		$	(0.5	)	(7	)%	$	5.2		$	6.8	$	(1.6	)	(24	)%
Cost of sales	6.3		7.6			1.3			17	%	5.4			6.3		0.9			14	%
Gross profit (loss)	$	0.5	$	(0.3	)	$	0.8		267	%	$	(0.2	)	$	0.5	$	(0.7	)

Total
Revenue	$	50.3	$	21.4		$	28.9		135	%	$	34.1		$	50.3	$	(16.2	)	(32	)%
Cost of sales	38.7		23.5			(15.2		)	(65	)%	26.3			39.0		12.7			33	%
Gross profit (loss)	$	11.6	$	(2.1	)	$	13.7		652	%
Gross profit											$	7.8		$	11.3	$	(3.5	)

Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2017 2016 $ Change % Change
LEU segment
Revenue:
SWU revenue $ 82.2
$ 128.3
$ (46.1 ) (36 )%
Uranium revenue —
14.3
(14.3 ) (100 )%
Total 82.2
142.6
(60.4 ) (42 )%
Cost of sales 76.8
130.7
53.9
41 %
Gross profit $ 5.4
$ 11.9
$ (6.5 ) (55 )%

Contract services segment

Revenue $ 19.3
$ 32.2
$ (12.9 ) (40 )%
Cost of sales 19.9
24.9
5.0
20 %
Gross profit (loss) $ (0.6 ) $ 7.3
$ (7.9 ) (108 )%

Total

Revenue $ 101.5
$ 174.8
$ (73.3 ) (42 )%
Cost of sales 96.7
155.6
58.9
38 %
Gross profit $ 4.8
$ 19.2
$ (14.4 ) (75 )%



	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018			2017			$ Change			% Change
LEU Segment
Revenue:
SWU revenue	$	68.2		$	82.2		$	(14.0	)	(17	)%
Uranium revenue	14.9			—			14.9			–
Total	83.1			82.2			0.9			1	%
Cost of sales	98.6			77.9			(20.7		)	(27	)%
Gross profit (loss)	$	(15.5	)	$	4.3		$	(19.8	)

Contract Services Segment
Revenue	$	26.1		$	19.3		$	6.8		35	%
Cost of sales	18.8			19.9			1.1			6	%
Gross profit (loss)	$	7.3		$	(0.6	)	$	7.9

Total
Revenue	$	109.2		$	101.5		$	7.7		8	%
Cost of sales	117.4			97.8			(19.6		)	(20	)%
Gross profit (loss)	$	(8.2	)	$	3.7		$	(11.9	)

Revenue

Revenue from the LEU ~~segment increased $29.4~~Segment declined $14.6 million ~~(or 209%)~~ in the three months and ~~declined $60.4~~increased $0.9 million ~~(or 42%)~~ in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to the corresponding periods in ~~2016.~~2017. Revenue in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2018, includes uranium revenue of $11.3 million and $14.9 million, respectively, with no uranium revenue in the corresponding prior periods. The volume of SWU sales ~~increased 178%~~declined 61% in the three-month period and ~~declined 30%~~increased 31% in the nine-month ~~period. We expect more than one-half~~period ended September 30, 2018, reflecting the variability in timing of ~~our annual revenue in the fourth quarter of 2017. We expect SWU volumes delivered will decline in 2017 compared to 2016. Refer to~~ ~~2017 Outlook~~ ~~above.~~utility customer orders. The average price billed to customers for sales of SWU increased ~~11%~~2% in the three-month ~~period and declined 8% in the nine-month~~ period reflecting the particular contracts under which SWU were sold during the periods. ~~We expect the~~The average SWU price ~~for~~declined 37% in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2018 reflecting the trend of lower SWU market prices in recent years and a greater concentration of sales ~~during the full year 2017 will be approximately 3% lower than in 2016.~~made under contracts under more recent market conditions.

Revenue from the ~~contract services segment~~Contract Services Segment declined ~~$0.5~~$1.6 million ~~(or 7%)~~ in the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the corresponding period in 2016, reflecting the reduced scope of contract work for American Centrifuge technology services in the current period. Revenue from the contract services segment declined $12.9and increased $6.8 million ~~(or 40%)~~ in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to the corresponding ~~period~~periods in ~~2016, due to~~2017, reflecting the reduced scope of work ~~and~~under the ~~timing of revenue recognition in the prior period. As a result of the~~ contract ~~signed~~ with UT-Battelle in ~~March 2016, revenue~~the current periods, partially offset by services provided under the X-energy contract beginning in the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016, included $24.2 million for work~~second quarter of 2018. The increase in the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016, as well as $8.1~~nine-month period also reflects $9.5 million ~~for March 2016 reports on~~of revenue related to the January 2018 settlement with DOE related to past work ~~performed in the fourth quarter of 2015.~~performed.

Cost of Sales

Cost of sales for the LEU ~~segment increased $16.5~~Segment declined $11.8 million ~~(or 104%)~~ in the three months and ~~declined $53.9~~increased $20.7 million ~~(or 41%)~~ in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to the corresponding periods in ~~2016,~~2017, primarily ~~due to the~~reflecting changes in SWU and uranium sales volumes ~~noted above~~ and partially offset by declines in the average cost of sales per SWU.

Cost of sales is affected by sales volumes, unit costs of inventory, and direct charges to cost of sales such as ~~inventory valuation adjustments and~~ legacy costs related to former ~~GDP employees and other residual costs related to the Paducah GDP.~~uranium enrichment employees. Refer to Impact of Legacy Costs below.In the nine-month period ended September 30, 2018, the average cost of sales per SWU declined approximately 15%. We anticipate our average cost of sales per SWU to decline again in 2019, with further declines in subsequent years, as a result of lower pricing in new supply contracts and the pricing provisions of existing contracts.

~~Our inventories are valued at~~Cost of sales for the ~~lower of cost or net realizable value. Valuation adjustments for our uranium inventory to reflect declines~~Contract Services Segment declined $0.9 million in ~~uranium market price indicators totaled $3.0~~the three months and $1.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016, including $2.3 million in third quarter of 2016.~~

~~Cost of sales for the contract services segment declined $1.3 million (or 17%) in the three months and $5.0 million (or 20%) in the nine months ended September 30, 2017,~~2018, compared to the corresponding periods in ~~2016, due to~~2017, reflecting the reduced scope of work under the contract ~~work.~~with UT-Battelle over the current nine-month period, partially offset by costs for services provided under the X-energy contract beginning in the second quarter of 2018.

Gross Profit (Loss)

We realized a gross profit of ~~$11.6~~$7.8 million in the three months ended September 30, ~~2017, an increase~~2018, a decline of ~~$13.7~~$3.5 million compared to the gross ~~loss~~profit of ~~$2.1~~$11.3 million in the corresponding period in ~~2016. We~~2017. In the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we realized ~~an increase in~~a gross loss of $8.2 million, down $11.9 million compared to the gross profit of ~~$12.9~~$3.7 million in the corresponding period in 2017. Excluding the $9.5 million of revenue in the current period from the January 2018 settlement with DOE related to past work performed, we realized a gross loss in the nine months ended September 30, 2018, of $17.7 million.

The gross profit for the LEU ~~segment~~Segment in the three months ended September 30, 2018, was $8.0 million compared to $10.8 million in the corresponding period in 2017. The decline of $2.8 million was primarily due to ~~increases~~the decline in SWU sales volume. In the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the gross loss for the LEU Segment was $15.5 million, down $19.8 million compared to the gross profit of $4.3 million in the ~~average~~corresponding period in 2017. SWU sales ~~price and SWU sales volume, and a decline~~ in the ~~average SWU cost.~~nine months ended September 30, 2018, reflect a greater concentration of sales made under contracts that reflect lower prices under more recent market conditions.

For the Contract Services Segment, we realized a gross loss of $0.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2018, compared to a gross profit of $0.5 million in the corresponding period in 2017. We realized a gross profit of ~~$4.8~~$7.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, a decline~~2018, including $9.5 million of ~~$14.4 million~~revenue from the January 2018 settlement with DOE, compared to ~~the~~a gross ~~profit~~loss of ~~$19.2~~$0.6 million in the corresponding period in 2016. We realized a decline in gross profit of $6.5 million for the LEU segment primarily due to the decline in the average SWU sales price and the decline in SWU sales volume for the nine months compared to the prior period, partially offset by a decline in the average SWU cost.

We realized a decline in gross profit of $7.9 million for the contract services segment in the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the corresponding period in 2016. Revenue for the contract services segment in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, included a billing for March 2016 reports on work performed in the fourth quarter of 2015. Related expenses were included in ~~Advanced Technology License and Decommissioning Costs~~ ~~in 2015 as they were incurred before a contract was in place. We realized a gross loss of $0.6 million for the contract services segment in the nine months ended September 30, 2017,~~2017. Gross losses are due to costs incurred which are ~~not fully recoverable from~~greater than the revenue under the ~~contract~~contracts with ~~UT-Battelle.~~UT-Battelle and X-energy.

Impact of Legacy Costs

~~The Company~~We ceased uranium enrichment at the Portsmouth ~~GDP~~Gaseous Diffusion Plant in 2001 and the Paducah ~~GDP~~Gaseous Diffusion Plant in 2013. Included in cost of sales are costs related to benefits for former ~~GDP employees and other residual costs related to the Paducah GDP.~~uranium enrichment employees. These legacy costs are distinct from ~~the Company’s~~our current costs of acquiring SWU and uranium for sale. The following table presents the impact of legacy costs on gross profit (loss) for the LEU ~~segment~~Segment (dollar amounts in millions):


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
LEU segment (GAAP)
Gross profit	$	5.4		$	11.9
LEU Segment (GAAP)
Gross profit (loss)							$	(15.5	)	$	4.3
Gross margin	6.6		%	8.3		%	(18.7		)%	5.2		%

Legacy costs included in cost of sales:
Pension and postretirement health and life benefits	$	2.2		$	3.2		$	2.3		$	3.3
Disability obligations and other	0.4			3.9			0.6			0.4
Legacy costs	$	2.6		$	7.1		$	2.9		$	3.7

LEU segment excluding legacy costs (non-GAAP)
Gross profit excluding legacy costs	$	8.0		$	19.0
LEU Segment excluding legacy costs (non-GAAP)
Gross profit (loss) excluding legacy costs							$	(12.6	)	$	8.0
Gross margin excluding legacy costs	9.7		%	13.3		%	(15.2		)%	9.7		%

We believe the non-GAAP financial measures above, when considered together with the corresponding GAAP measures and the reconciliation above, can provide additional understanding of the Company’s financial performance and underlying profitability. Management uses the non-GAAP financial measures to provide investors with a more complete understanding of the Company’s historical results and trends.

These non-GAAP financial measures are used in addition to and in conjunction with results presented in accordance with our GAAP results. The non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as a substitute for, or superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures used by the Company may be calculated differently from, and therefore may not be comparable to, non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies.

Non-Segment Information

The following tables present elements of the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations that are not categorized by segment (dollar amounts in millions):


	Three Months Ended September 30,											Three Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			$ Change			% Change		2018			2017			$ Change			% Change
Gross profit (loss)	$	11.6		$	(2.1	)	$	13.7		652	%
Gross profit												$	7.8		$	11.3		$	(3.5	)	(31	)%
Advanced technology license and decommissioning costs	4.5			21.9			17.4			79	%	5.8			4.5			(1.3		)	(29	)%
Selling, general and administrative	11.0			10.7			(0.3		)	(3	)%	8.8			11.0			2.2			20	%
Amortization of intangible assets	2.5			1.7			(0.8		)	(47	)%	1.7			2.5			0.8			32	%
Special charges for workforce reductions and advisory costs	2.4			0.6			(1.8		)	(300	)%	0.6			2.4			1.8			75	%
Gains on sales of assets	(0.6		)	(0.3		)	0.3			100	%	—			(0.6		)	(0.6		)	(100	)%
Operating loss	(8.2		)	(36.7		)	28.5			78	%	(9.1		)	(8.5		)	(0.6		)	(7	)%
Nonoperating components of net periodic benefit expense (income)												(1.6		)	(0.3		)	1.3			433	%
Interest expense	0.7			4.7			4.0			85	%	1.0			0.7			(0.3		)	(43	)%
Investment income	(0.4		)	(0.1		)	0.3			300	%	(0.7		)	(0.4		)	0.3			75	%
Loss before income taxes	(8.5		)	(41.3		)	32.8			79	%	(7.8		)	(8.5		)	0.7			8	%
Income tax benefit	—			—			—			–		—			—			—			—
Net loss	(8.5		)	(41.3		)	32.8			79	%	(7.8		)	(8.5		)	0.7			8	%
Preferred stock dividends - undeclared and cumulative	2.0			—			2.0			–		1.9			2.0			0.1			5	%
Net loss allocable to common stockholders	$	(10.5	)	$	(41.3	)	$	30.8		75	%	$	(9.7	)	$	(10.5	)	$	0.8		8	%


	Nine Months Ended September 30,											Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			$ Change			% Change		2018			2017			$ Change			% Change
Gross profit	$	4.8		$	19.2		$	(14.4	)	(75	)%
Gross profit (loss)												$	(8.2	)	3.7			$	(11.9	)	(322	)%
Advanced technology license and decommissioning costs	15.0			38.6			23.6			61	%	19.2			15.0			(4.2		)	(28	)%
Selling, general and administrative	33.1			34.6			1.5			4	%	29.7			33.1			3.4			10	%
Amortization of intangible assets	5.7			7.6			1.9			25	%	4.5			5.7			1.2			21	%
Special charges for workforce reductions and advisory costs	7.1			1.2			(5.9		)	(492	)%	1.5			7.1			5.6			79	%
Gains on sales of assets	(2.3		)	(1.0		)	1.3			130	%	(0.3		)	(2.3		)	(2.0		)	(87	)%
Operating loss	(53.8		)	(61.8		)	8.0			13	%	(62.8		)	(54.9		)	(7.9		)	(14	)%
Gain on early extinguishment of debt	(33.6		)	(16.7		)	16.9			101	%	—			(33.6		)	(33.6		)	(100	)%
Nonoperating components of net periodic benefit expense (income)												(4.9		)	(1.1		)	3.8			345	%
Interest expense	4.3			14.8			10.5			71	%	3.0			4.3			1.3			30	%
Investment income	(1.0		)	(0.5		)	0.5			100	%	(1.9		)	(1.0		)	0.9			90	%
Loss before income taxes	(23.5		)	(59.4		)	35.9			60	%	(59.0		)	(23.5		)	(35.5		)	(151	)%
Income tax benefit	(0.2		)	(0.6		)	(0.4		)	(67	)%	(0.1		)	(0.2		)	(0.1		)	(50	)%
Net loss	(23.3		)	(58.8		)	35.5			60	%	(58.9		)	(23.3		)	(35.6		)	(153	)%
Preferred stock dividends - undeclared and cumulative	5.0			—			5.0			–		5.9			5.0			(0.9		)	(18	)%
Net loss allocable to common stockholders	$	(28.3	)	$	(58.8	)	$	30.5		52	%	$	(64.8	)	$	(28.3	)	$	(36.5	)	(129	)%

Advanced Technology License and Decommissioning Costs

Advanced technology license and decommissioning costs consist of American Centrifuge expenses that are outside of our customer contracts ~~with UT-Battelle,~~in the Contract Services Segment, including ongoing costs ~~to maintain~~for work at the ~~demobilized~~ Piketon ~~facility and our NRC licenses at that location.~~facility. Costs ~~declined $17.4~~increased $1.3 million (or ~~79%~~29%) in the three months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the corresponding period in 2016. The prior period included a $15.0 million charge to increase the accrued D&D liability for the Piketon demonstration facility based on updated cost estimates. Costs declined $23.6and $4.2 million (or ~~61%~~28%) in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to the corresponding ~~period~~periods in ~~2016, due~~2017. In the current periods, efforts at the Piketon facility were focused on supporting NRC requirements, including working towards an elimination of the required financial assurance, and DOE lease turnover activities and the related costs were charged to ~~the $15.0 million increase in the D&D liability in~~expense. In the prior period, and demobilization costs incurred in early 2016 in preparation for the D&D of the Piketon facility. D&D costs commenced in the second quarter of 2016 and are charged against the D&D liability. For additional detailsefforts were primarily focused on ~~the~~ D&D of the Piketon facility ~~refer to~~ ~~American Centrifuge - Piketon Facility Costs~~ and ~~D&D Obligations~~ in ~~Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies,~~the related costs were recorded as a reduction of the ~~condensed consolidated financial statements.~~D&D liability. In addition, a greater allocation of Piketon facility costs was charged to advanced technology license and decommissioning costs in the current periods following the relocation of certain corporate functions from the Piketon facility.

Selling, General and Administrative

Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses ~~increased $0.3~~declined $2.2 million (or 3%20%) in the three months and ~~declined $1.5~~$3.4 million (or 4%10%) in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to the corresponding periods in ~~2016. Consulting costs~~2017. Overhead allocated to SG&A expenses declined ~~$0.3~~$0.5 million in the three months and $2.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018, following the relocation of certain corporate functions from the Piketon facility. Compensation and benefits declined $0.8 million in the three-month period and ~~$1.4~~$1.2 million in the nine-month period. ~~Compensation and benefit~~Consulting costs ~~were flat~~declined $0.4 million in the three-month period and ~~declined $0.3~~increased $0.2 million in the nine-month period, ~~ended September 30, 2017, including the effect of an $0.8 million loss in the prior period~~primarily for work related to ~~the remeasurement of pension obligations.~~business development.

Amortization of Intangible Assets

Amortization expense for the intangible asset related to the September 2014 sales order book is a function of SWU sales volume under that order book, which ~~increased~~declined in the ~~three-month period~~three and ~~declined in the~~ nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to the corresponding periods in ~~2016. Amortization expense for the~~2017. The intangible asset related to customer relationships is amortized on a straight-line basis.

Special Charges for Workforce Reductions and Advisory Costs

Special charges declined $1.8 million (or 75%) in the three months and $5.6 million (or 79%) in the nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared to the corresponding periods in 2017. Special charges in the nine months ended September 30, 2018, and 2017, ~~included~~consisted of estimated employee termination benefits of ~~$2.3~~$1.4 million ~~including $0.7~~and $2.1 million ~~in the third quarter, less $0.2~~and advisory costs of $0.1 million ~~for unvested employee departures.~~and $5.0 million, respectively. Advisory costs related to updating the Company’s ~~project to align its corporate structure to the scale of its ongoing business operations and to update related~~ information technology ~~were $1.7 million and $5.0 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, compared to $0.3 million and $0.8 million in the corresponding periods of 2016.~~systems.

Gain on Early Extinguishment of Debt

In the first quarter of 2017, ~~the Company~~we recognized a gain of $33.6 million related to the exchange of securities and cash on February 14, 2017, which is net of transaction costs of $9.0 million and previously deferred issuance costs related to the 8% PIK Toggle Notes of $0.4 million. Refer to Note 8,7, Debt, of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~In June 2016, we repurchased 8% PIK Toggle Notes having an aggregate principal~~Nonoperating Components of Net Periodic Benefit Expense (Income)

Effective January 1, 2018, a new accounting standard requires components of retirement benefit expense/income other than service cost to be presented below the subtotal for operating income (loss). The increases in nonoperating components of net periodic benefit income for the three and ~~accrued~~nine months ended September 30, 2018, reflect a decline in market interest ~~balance~~rates used to increase recorded retirement benefit obligations for the passage of ~~$26.6 million for cash payments of $9.8 million. The gain on~~time, compared to the ~~early extinguishment of~~corresponding periods in 2017. For the ~~notes was $16.7 million, net of commissions~~three and ~~unamortized deferred issuance costs totaling $0.1 million.~~nine months ended September 30, 2017, $0.3

million and $1.1 million, respectively, of income was reclassified from Cost of Sales of the LEU Segment to conform with the current presentation.

Interest Expense

Interest expense ~~declined $4.0~~increased $0.3 million (or ~~85%~~43%) in the three months ended September 30, 2018, and ~~$10.5~~decreased $1.3 million (or ~~71%~~30%) in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to the corresponding periods in ~~2016, due to~~2017. The decline for the nine-month period was the result of the early extinguishment of 87% of the outstanding principal amount of the 8% PIK Toggle Notes on February 14, 2017. No interest expense is recognized on the ~~new~~ 8.25% Notes as described in Note 8,7, Debt, of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Income Tax Benefit

The income tax benefit was $0 and $0.1 million in the three ~~months~~ and ~~$0.2 million in the~~ nine months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. The income tax benefit was $0 and $0.2 million in the three ~~months~~ and ~~$0.6 million in the~~ nine months ended September 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The income tax benefit in both nine-month periods resulted from discrete items for reversals of previously accrued amounts associated with liabilities for unrecognized benefits.

Net Loss

Our net loss was $7.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2018, compared to a net loss of $8.5 million in the three months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2017. The favorable variance of $0.7 million includes a $2.2 million decline in SG&A expenses, a $1.8 million decline in special charges and a $1.3 million increase in net periodic benefit income, partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in advanced technology license and decommissioning costs and a $3.5 million decline in the gross profit.

Our net loss was $58.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared to a net loss of $41.3 million in the three months ended September 30, 2016. The favorable variance of $32.8 million was primarily the result of the $13.7 million improvement in gross profit, $15.0 million of accrued D&D costs in the prior period, and the $4.0 million decline in interest expense.

~~Our net loss was~~ $23.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, compared to a~~2017. The net loss ~~of $58.8 million in~~for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016. The favorable~~2017, included the non-recurring gain on early extinguishment of debt of $33.6 million. Additionally, the unfavorable variance of ~~$35.5~~$35.6 million was ~~primarily~~impacted by a $11.9 million increase in the ~~result of~~gross loss ($21.4 million excluding the ~~$23.6~~settlement with DOE) and a $4.2 million ~~decline~~increase in advanced technology license and decommissioning costs, ~~including D&D cost accruals, the $16.9~~partially offset by a $5.6 million decline in special charges, a $3.8 million increase in ~~gains on the early extinguishment of debt,~~net periodic benefit income and ~~the $10.5~~a $3.4 million decline in ~~interest expense, partially offset by the $14.4 million decline in gross profit and the $5.9 million increase in special charges.~~SG&A expenses.

Preferred Stock Dividends - Undeclared and Cumulative

Holders of the Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to cumulative dividends of 7.5% per annum of the aggregate liquidation preference at origination of $104.6 million. We did not meet the criteria for a dividend payment obligation for the ~~quarter~~three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, and we have not declared, accrued or paid dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock since issuance on February 14, 2017. Dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock are cumulative to the extent not paid at any quarter-end, whether or not declared and whether or not there are assets of the Company legally available for the payment of such dividends in whole or in part. Refer to Note 12, Stockholders’ Equity.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We ended the third quarter of ~~2017~~2018 with a consolidated cash balance of ~~$135.9~~$124.9 million. We anticipate having adequate liquidity to support our business operations for at least the next 12 months from the date of this report. Our view of liquidity is dependent on, among other things, our operations and the level of expenditures and government funding for our services contracts and the ~~American Centrifuge program.~~timing of customer payments. Liquidity requirements for our existing operations are affected primarily by the timing and amount of customer sales and our inventory purchases.

We believe our sales order book in our LEU ~~segment~~Segment is a source of stability for our liquidity position. Our~~Centrus’~~ sales order book extends for more than a decade. Although, based on current market conditions, we see limited uncommitted demand for LEU for the remainder of this decade before an anticipated rise in uncommitted demand in the 2020s, we continue to seek and make additional sales, including sales for delivery during that time period.

Substantially all revenue-generating operations of the Company are conducted at the subsidiary level. Centrus’ principal source of funding for American Centrifuge activities is provided: (i) under the recently-completed contract with UT-Battelle, the operator of ORNL; and (ii) from Centrus’ ~~wholly owned~~wholly-owned subsidiary, ~~United States Enrichment Corporation (“~~Enrichment Corp.”) to Centrus and its 100% indirectly owned subsidiary American Centrifuge Operating, LLC pursuant to two secured intercompany financing notes. The financing obtained from Enrichment Corp. funds American Centrifuge activities pending receipt of payments related to work performed under the contract with UT-Battelle, American Centrifuge costs that are outside the scope of work under the contract with UT-Battelle, including D&D and other costs ~~and ongoing costs to maintain~~of the Piketon facility, ~~and our NRC licenses at that location,~~ and general corporate expenses, including cash interest payments on our debt. Although the most recent contract with UT-Battelle expired September 30, 2018, we continue to perform work towards the expected milestones as the parties work toward a successor agreement. However, we have no assurance that a successor agreement will be executed.

Capital expenditures are expected to be insignificant for at least the next 12 months.

In ~~September 2015,~~February 2016, Centrus completed a successful three-year demonstration of the American Centrifuge technology at its facility in Piketon, Ohio. U.S. government funding for American Centrifuge since October 2015 is now limited to research and development work at our facilities in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. ~~As a result of reduced program funding, workforce reductions commenced in the fourth quarter of 2015 and we expect to make payments of $4.9 million for remaining workforce reductions through 2019.~~

Centrus began to incur expenditures in the second quarter of 2016 associated with the D&D of the Piketon facility in accordance with the requirements of the NRC and DOE. In the nine months ended September 30, 2017, D&D costs of $22.1 million were charged against the accrued D&D liability. The D&D work is expected to be substantially completed by year-end. As of September 30, 2017, we have accrued $16.6 million for the estimated fair value of the remaining costs to complete the D&D work.

Centrus has previously provided financial assurance to the NRC and DOE for D&D and lease turnover costs in the form of surety bonds of approximately $16 million and $13 million, respectively, which are fully cash collateralized by Centrus. Centrus expects to receive cash when surety bonds are reduced and/or cancelled as the Company fulfills its D&D and lease obligations.

In the event that funding by the U.S. government is further reduced or discontinued, the American Centrifuge project may be subject to further demobilization, costs, delays and termination. Any such actions may have a material adverse impact on our ability to deploy the American Centrifuge technology and on our liquidity.

We have previously provided financial assurance to the NRC for the D&D of the Piketon test facility in the form of surety bonds that are fully cash collateralized by us for $16.3 million. We believe the D&D work required for elimination of financial assurance under NRC license requirements has been completed and we are working with the NRC to have the surety bonds cancelled which would permit the Company to receive the cash collateral.

We lease the Piketon facility from DOE. At the conclusion of the lease on June 30, 2019, without mutual agreement between us and DOE regarding other possible uses for the facility, we are obligated to return the facility to DOE in a condition that meets NRC requirements and in the same condition as the facility was in when it was leased to us (other than due to normal wear and tear). As of September 30, 2018, we have remaining accrued lease turnover obligations of $1.6 million. We have previously provided financial assurance to DOE for the lease turnover obligations in the form of surety bonds that are fully cash collateralized by us for $13.7 million. We expect to receive cash when these surety bonds are reduced and/or cancelled as the Company fulfills its lease turnover obligations.

In addition to remaining lease turnover obligations of $1.6 million and accrued employee termination benefits of $3.2 million related to the Piketon facility, we anticipate incurring expenses of approximately $10 million from the fourth quarter of 2018 through the second quarter of 2019 to continue to maintain the lease facilities in accordance with the lease. If remaining costs related to the Piketon facility are greater than our estimates, then such increased costs could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and liquidity.

The change in cash, ~~and~~ cash equivalents and restricted cash from our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows are as follows on a summarized basis (in millions):


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
Cash used in operating activities	$	(95.6	)	$	(51.9	)	$	(77.7	)	$	(86.6	)
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities	1.8			(1.5		)
Cash provided by investing activities							0.3			1.8
Cash used in financing activities	(31.0		)	(9.8		)	(6.1		)	(40.0		)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(124.8	)	$	(63.2	)	$	(83.5	)	$	(124.8	)

Operating Activities

The net reduction of $64.8 million in the SWU purchase payables balance, due to the timing of purchase deliveries, was a significant use of cash in the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The operating loss of $62.8 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018, net of non-cash expenses, was a use of cash. Sources of cash included the net reduction in receivables from utility customers of $42.1 million.

In the corresponding period in 2017, the net reduction of $42.3 million in the SWU purchase payables balance, due to the timing of purchase deliveries, was a significant use of cash in the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Other major uses of cash were corporate costs including benefits funding and costs for D&D of the American Centrifuge demonstration cascade. Sources of cash included the monetization of inventory as inventories declined $17.9 million in the nine-month period and receivables from utility customers declined $6.2 million.

In the corresponding period in 2016, the net reduction of $68.9 million in the SWU purchase payables balance, due to the timing of purchase deliveries, was a significant use of cash. Other major uses of cash were corporate costs including benefits funding and costs for D&D of the American Centrifuge demonstration cascade. Sources of cash included the monetization of inventory as inventories declined $45.8 million in the nine-month period and receivables from utility customers declined $18.4 million.

Investing Activities

~~Capital~~There were no significant capital expenditures ~~were $0.3~~in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. Sales of unneeded assets and property yielded net proceeds of $0.4 million and $2.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, ~~and $3.0 million in the corresponding period of 2016.~~respectively.

Financing Activities

In the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the $6.1 million payment of interest classified as debt is classified as a financing activity. Refer to Note 7, Debt, of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements regarding the accounting for the 8.25% Notes.

In February 2017, Centrus exchanged $204.9 million principal amount of the Company’s 8% ~~paid-in-kind (“PIK”) toggle notes (“8%~~ PIK Toggle ~~Notes”)~~Notes for $74.3 million principal amount of 8.25% ~~notes maturing in February 2027 (the “8.25% Notes”),~~Notes, 104,574 shares of Series B Preferred Stock and $27.6 million of cash. Refer to Note 8,7, Debt of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~In June 2016, Centrus repurchased 8% PIK Toggle Notes having an aggregate principal balance of $26.1 million and accrued interest payable balance of $0.5 million for cash payments of $9.8 million.~~

Working Capital

The following table summarizes the Company’s working capital (in millions):


	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
	(in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	135.9		$	260.7		$	124.9		$	208.8
Accounts receivable	14.2			19.9			2.5			60.2
Inventories, net	102.0			119.9			59.2			75.2
Deposits for financial assurance							30.2			16.3
Current debt							(39.1		)	(6.1		)
Other current assets and liabilities, net	(106.2		)	(165.6		)	(107.5		)	(190.9		)
Working capital	$	145.9		$	234.9		$	70.2		$	163.5

Capital Structure and Financial Resources

On February 14, 2017, pursuant to an exchange offer and consent solicitation, we exchanged $204.9 million principal amount of our 8% PIK Toggle Notes for $74.3 million principal amount of the 8.25% Notes, 104,574 shares of Series B Preferred Stock with liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and $27.6 million of cash. Following the exchange offer, $29.6 million principal amount of 8% PIK Toggle Notes remained outstanding. The Company recognized a gain related to the note exchange of $33.6 million in the first quarter of 2017, which is net of transaction costs of $9.0 million and previously deferred issuance costs related to the 8% PIK Toggle Notes of $0.4 million.

Interest on the 8.25% Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears as of February 28 and August 31 based on a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months. The 8.25% Notes are guaranteed on a subordinated and limited basis by, and secured by substantially all assets of, Enrichment Corp. ~~Additional terms and conditions of the~~The 8.25% Notes ~~and the Enrichment Corp. guarantee are described in~~ ~~Note 8, Debt~~ ~~of the condensed consolidated financial statements.~~mature on February 28, 2027.

The principal amount of the 8% PIK Toggle Notes is increased by any payment of interest in the form of PIK payments. ~~The Company has~~We have the option to pay up to 5.5% per annum of interest due on the 8% PIK Toggle Notes in the form of PIK payments. For the semi-annual interest periods ended March 31, 2017, and September 30, 2017, the Company elected to pay interest in the form of cash payments at 2.5% per annum and PIK payments at 5.5% per annum. The principal amount of the 8% PIK Toggle Notes was $31.3 million as of September 30, 2017. The 8%

PIK Toggle Notes are guaranteed and secured on a subordinated, conditional, and limited basis by Enrichment Corp. ~~Enrichment Corp. will be released from its guarantee without the consent of the holders of the 8%~~The 8.0% PIK Toggle Notes mature on September 30, 2019. However, the maturity date can be extended to September 30, 2024, upon the ~~occurrence~~satisfaction of certain ~~termination events (other than with respect~~funding conditions described in the applicable indenture relating to ~~an unconditional interest claim).~~ the funding, under binding agreements, of (i) the American Centrifuge project or (ii) the implementation and deployment of a National Security Train Program utilizing American Centrifuge technology.

Additional terms and conditions of the 8.25% Notes and the 8% PIK Toggle Notes ~~and the Enrichment Corp. guarantee~~ are described in Note 8,7, Debt, of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial ~~statements.~~statements and Note 9, Debt, of the audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Holders of the Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to cumulative dividends of 7.5% per annum of the Liquidation Preference. We are obligated to pay cash dividends on our Series B Preferred Stock to the extent ~~that: our pension plans~~dividends are declared by the Board and ~~Enrichment Corp.’s pension plans~~certain criteria are at least 90% funded on a variable rate premium calculation in the current plan year; our net income calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) (excluding the effect of pension remeasurement) for the immediately preceding fiscal quarter exceeds $7.5 million; our free cash flow (defined as the sum of cash provided by (used in) operating activities and cash provided by (used in) investing activities) for the immediately preceding four fiscal quarters exceeds $35 million; the balance of cash and cash equivalents calculated in accordance with GAAP on the last day of the immediately preceding quarter would exceed $150 million after pro forma application of the dividend payment; and dividends may be legally paid under Delaware law. Centrus hasmet. We have not met these criteria for the periods from issuance through September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, and ~~has~~have not declared, accrued or paid dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. Additional terms and conditions of the Series B Preferred Stock, including the criteria that must be met for the payment of dividends, are described in Note 12, Stockholders’ Equity of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

The nuclear industry in general, and the nuclear fuel industry in particular, are in a period of significant change. We are actively considering, and expect to consider from time to time in the future, potential strategic transactions, which at any given time may be in various stages of discussions, diligence or ~~negotiation with respect to a number of potential acquisitions.~~negotiation. If we pursue opportunities that require capital, we believe we would seek to satisfy these needs through a combination of working capital, cash generated from operations or additional debt or equity financing.

We are managing our working capital to seek to improve the long-term value of our LEU business and are planning to continue funding the Company’s qualified pension plans in the ordinary course because we believe that is in the best interest of all stakeholders. We expect that any other uses of working capital will be undertaken in light of these strategic priorities and will be based on the Company’s determination as to the relative strength of its operating performance and prospects, financial position and expected liquidity requirements. In addition, we expect that any such other uses of working capital will be subject to compliance with contractual restrictions to which the Company and its subsidiaries are subject, including the terms and conditions of their debt securities and credit facilities. ~~The Company~~We continually ~~evaluates~~evaluate alternatives to manage our capital structure, and may opportunistically repurchase, exchange or redeem Company securities from time to time.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Other than outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds, our SWU purchase commitments and the license agreement with DOE relating to the American Centrifuge technology disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, there were no material off-balance sheet arrangements at September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, or December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

New Accounting Standards ~~Not Yet Implemented~~

Reference is made to New Accounting Standards in Note 1, Basis of Presentation, of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for information on new accounting standards.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Centrus maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by Centrus in reports it files or submits under the ~~Securities~~ Exchange Act ~~of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”)~~ is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

~~As previously disclosed in~~ ~~Part II, Item 9A, Controls and Procedures~~ of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, management identified a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Because of this material weakness, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2016.

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the end of the period covered by this report, our management performed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the ~~Securities~~ Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded, as of September 30, 2018, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were ~~not effective due to the previously identified material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, which continued to exist as of September 30, 2017.~~

Notwithstanding the material weakness described below, our management concluded that the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates, and for the periods presented, in accordance with GAAP.

~~Efforts to Address Material Weakness~~

The Company has made, and expects to continue to make, progress in improving internal control over accounting for our D&D obligation. Management has enhanced its review process of D&D costs incurred and projected costs remaining to complete the D&D work and has formalized applicable procedures as remedial controls and has begun related controls testing. The material weakness will not be considered remediated until the remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively. We expect that the remediation of this material weakness will be completed by the end of 2017.effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended September 30, 2017, the Company implemented a new enterprise resource planning (ERP) system in which a significant portion of our business transactions originate and are processed and recorded. The implementation included the outsourcing of payroll functions. As a result of the ERP system implementation, we modified certain existing controls as well as implemented new controls to adapt to changes in our processes. We concluded, as part of our evaluation described in the above paragraphs, that the implementation of the ERP system has not materially affected our internal control over financial reporting. Other than the ERP system implementation and steps taken to work towards the remediation of the material weakness identified above, thereThere were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

~~There have been no material changes~~On October 11, 2018, the Company’s subsidiaries, United States Enrichment Corporation (“Enrichment”) and American Centrifuge Enrichment, LLC (“ACE”, together with Enrichment, the “Company Subsidiaries”) filed proofs of claim in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio (the “Bankruptcy Court”) against each of FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (“FENOC”), FirstEnergy Nuclear Generation, LLC (“FENG,” and together with FENOC, the “FirstEnergy Contract Parties”), FirstEnergy Solutions Corp. (“FES”) and FirstEnergy Generation, LLC (“FG”) in the amount of approximately $314 million. The claims relate to damages arising from the rejection and breach of a long-term contract between the Company Subsidiaries and the FirstEnergy Contract Parties that was approved by the Bankruptcy Court and made effective as of July 26, 2018. The proofs of claim filed by the Company Subsidiaries include claims against FENOC and FENG based on their liability as parties to the contract that was rejected and breached. The proofs of claim filed by the Company Subsidiaries also include claims against FES and FG based on their liability under guaranties they issued that may obligate FES and FG to satisfy the rejection and breach of contract damages claims.

Refer to Note 14, Subsequent Event, of the condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) under Part I, Item 1 for information on legal proceedings in which the Company is involved. See also Legal Proceedings ~~set forth~~ under Part I, Item 3 ~~Legal Proceedings,~~ ~~in our~~of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

Centrus is subject to various legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these claims cannot be predicted with certainty, ~~we do~~other than the above, Centrus does not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters, individually ~~and~~or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on ~~our~~its cash flows, results of operations or consolidated financial condition.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the Risk Factors described in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

Item 6. Exhibits



10.48	Centrus Energy Corp. 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended and restated in May 2017).

10.49	Work Authorization dated September 27, 2018 under the Supply of Service Agreement Between United States Department of Energy and Centrus Energy Corp, Exhibit J to the Centrifuge Deployment Project Lease Agreement between the Department of Energy and USEC Inc.

31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as ~~amended~~amended..

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

101	~~Condensed~~Unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2018, filed in interactive data file (XBRL) format.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



			Centrus Energy Corp.


Date:	November ~~14, 2017~~8, 2018	By:	/s/ ~~Stephen S. Greene~~Marian K. Davis
			~~Stephen S. Greene~~Marian K. Davis
		Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
		(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

4145



(in millions)	Deferred Revenue			Deferred Cost			Gross Profit Deferred or (Recognized)			Margin

Balance at December 31, 2016	$	123.6		$	89.3		$	34.3		28%
Deferred sales in the period	66.4			44.9			21.5			32%
Previously deferred sales recognized in the period	(58.3		)	(39.7		)	(18.6		)	32%
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	131.7		$	94.5		$	37.2		28%