UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC  20549
 
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the quarterly period ended:September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 
 
OR
 
[  ] 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from   to  
 
Commission file number:000-52694 
 
 
QUAINT OAK BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Pennsylvania 35-2293957
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 
 
607 Lakeside Drive, Southampton, Pennsylvania 18966
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(215) 364-4059
(Registrant’s telephone number)
 
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  [X ]    No  [   ]
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes [   ]    No   [   ]
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer    [  ]
Accelerated filer        [  ]
Non-accelerated filer      [  ] 
Smaller reporting company     [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).     [  ] Yes   [X] No
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:  As of November 12, 2010, 1,102,336May 13, 2011, 1,992,436 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding.
 
 
 
 

 
 
INDEX
 
 
Page
PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATIONPage
    
Item 1: Financial Statements: 
    
   Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 20092010 (Unaudited)
1
     
   Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
 
2
     
   Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the NineThree Months Ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 (Unaudited)
 
3
     
   Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the NineThree Months Ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
 
4
     
   Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
5
    
Item 2: 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
        19
29
    
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
29
37
    
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
29
37
    
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION 
    
Item 1: Legal Proceedings
30
38
    
Item 1A: Risk Factors3038
    
Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
30
38
    
Item 33: Defaults Uponupon Senior Securities
30
38
    
Item 4: (Removed and Reserved)
31
38
    
Item 5: Other Information
31
39
    
Item 6: Exhibits
31
39
    
SIGNATURES   

 
 
 

 
 
PART I

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc. 

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
 
    At March 31,    At December 31,  
    2011    2010 
Assets   (In thousands, except share data) 
Due from banks, non-interest-bearing  $910  $973 
Due from banks, interest-bearing   9,655   7,677 
Cash and cash equivalents   10,565   8,650 
Investment in interest-earning time deposits   5,457   6,001 
Investment securities available for sale at fair value (cost-2011         
$3,904; 2010 $3,290)   3,882   3,271 
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity (fair value-2011         
$5,371; 2010 $5,810)   4,982   5,406 
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses         
$2011 823; 2010 $871   74,374   74,710 
Accrued interest receivable   466   423 
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost   719   757 
Premises and equipment, net   1,103   1,073 
Other real estate owned, net   1,401   1,191 
Prepaid expenses and other assets   678   619 
           
Total Assets
  $103,627  $102,101 
          
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity 
          
Liabilities         
Deposits, interest-bearing  $81,514  $79,691 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances   5,600   5,600 
Other borrowings   417   423 
Accrued interest payable   104   107 
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance   493   746 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities    135    343 
Total Liabilities
   88,263   86,910 
           
Stockholders’ Equity         
Preferred stock– $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized;         
none issued or outstanding   -   - 
Common stock – $0.01 par value; 9,000,000 shares         
authorized; 1,388,625 issued and 992,436 outstanding at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010    14    14 
Additional paid-in capital   13,508   13,478 
Treasury stock, at cost: 2011 396,189 shares; 2010 396,189 shares   (3,636)  (3,636)
Unallocated common stock held by:         
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP)    (796)  (813)
Recognition & Retention Plan Trust (RRP)   (360)  (360)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss)   (14)  (13)
Retained earnings   6,648    6,521 
Total Stockholders' Equity   15,364   15,191 
           
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity  $103,627  $102,101 
      
 
At September 30,
 
At December 31,
      2010 2009
Assets(In thousands, except share data)
Due from banks, non-interest-bearing   $537                         $582
Due from banks, interest-bearing  6,525 
 4,838
    Cash and cash equivalents  7,062   5,420
Investment in interest-earning time deposits  6,762   3,153
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value  (cost-2010
     $3,277; 2009 $1,001
 
  3,307
 
 
 1,002
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity (fair value-2010
     $6,643; 2009 $8,142)
 
   6,186
 
 
 7,731
Loans receivable, net of allowance for loan losses   
    (2010 $921; 2009 $835) 74,777                      72,728
Accrued interest receivable      422     397
Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost      797     797
Premises and equipment, net   1,076  1,092
Other real estate owned   1,198     913
Prepaid expenses and other assets
      611
 
    704
Total Assets
                  $102,198
 
                   $93,937
         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
         
Liabilities   
Deposits, interest-bearing                    $79,139                   $68,252
Federal Home Loan Bank advances                       5,600                       6,850
Other borrowings                          428                          442
Accrued interest payable                          103                          117
Advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance                          479                          763
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
                          252
 
                         127
Total Liabilities
                     86,001                     76,551
    
Stockholders’ Equity   
Preferred stock– $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized;
     none issued or outstanding
 
                              -
 
 
                             -
Common stock – $0.01 par value; 9,000,000 shares
authorized; 1,388,625 issued; 1,112,336 and 1,299,712 
outstanding at September  30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively
                  
 
                    
                           14
 
     
 
             
                          14
Additional paid-in capital                    13,448                    13,442
Treasury stock, at cost: 2010 276,289 shares; 2009 88,913 shares                     (2,443)                        (735)
Unallocated common stock held by:
        Employee Stock  Ownership Plan (ESOP)
 
                        (831)
 
 
                       (883)
        Recognition & Retention Plan Trust (RRP)                        (360)                        (440)
Accumulated other comprehensive income                           20                             1
Retained earnings
                      6,349
 
                     5,987
            Total Stockholders' Equity
                    16,197
                    17,386
    
            Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
                $102,198
 
                 $93,937
 
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
 
1

 
 
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc. 

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)
 
   For the Three   For the Nine 
   Months Ended   Months Ended 
  September 30,  September 30, 
   2010   2009   2010   2009 
Interest Income    (In thousands, except for share data)  
Loans receivable, including fees $1,290  $1,232  $3,678  $3,637 
Short-term investments and investment securities  131   128   376   444 
Total Interest Income  1,421   1,360   4,054   4,081 
                 
Interest Expense                
Deposits  427   538   1,259   1,658 
Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowings   67   75   207   227 
Total Interest Expense  494   613   1,466   1,885 
                 
Net Interest Income  927   747   2,588   2,196 
                 
Provision for Loan Losses  29   44   86   129 
                 
Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses  898   703   2,502   2,067 
                 
Non-Interest Income                
Mortgage banking fees  71   39   171   39 
Other fees and services charges  13   10   36   54 
Other  5   15   29   15 
Total Non-Interest Income
  89   64   236   108 
                 
Non-Interest Expense                
Salaries and employee benefits  347   265   1,005   737 
Directors' fees and expenses  51   63   155   196 
Occupancy and equipment  49   41   139   87 
Professional fees  84   58   265   261 
FDIC deposit insurance assessment  38   48   114   131 
Other real estate owned expense  72   24   98   97 
Advertising  15   3   44   9 
Other  46   37    150   99 
Total Non-Interest Expense
  702   539   1,970   1,617 
                 
Income before Income Taxes
  285   228   768   558 
                 
Income Taxes  112   89   303   220 
                 
  Net Income
 $173  $139  $465  $338 
                 
   Earnings per share - basic $0.17  $0.12  $0.44  $0.29 
   Average shares outstanding - basic  1,014,681   1,158,177   1,060,602   1,171,563 
   Earnings per share - diluted $0.17  $0.12  $0.44  $0.29 
   Average shares outstanding - diluted  1,016,299   1,158,427   1,064,789   1,171,824 
 For the Three Months Ended
 
March 31,
 
2011
 
2010
Interest Income(In thousands, except share data)
 
Interest on loans$                         1,236 $                         1,188
Interest and dividends on short-term investments and investment securities121              119
    
Total Interest Income1,357           1,307
Interest Expense
Interest on deposits406              415
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances54                67
Interest on other borrowings6                  6

Total Interest Expense466             488

Net Interest Income891             819

Provision for Loan Losses27               29

Net Interest Income after Provision for Loan Losses864             790

Non-Interest Income   
Mortgage banking and title abstract fees46                39
Other fees and services charges10                12
Other23                20
Total Non-Interest Income, net79                71
    
Non-Interest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits385              321
Directors’ fees and expenses58                52
Occupancy and equipment51                49
Professional fees76                86
FDIC deposit insurance assessment39                38
Other real estate owned expenses13                  8
Advertising11                  9
Other46                47
Total Other Expenses679              610

Income before Income Taxes264             251

Income Taxes107               98

Net Income$                            157$                            153

Earnings per share – basic$                           0.16 $                           0.14
Average shares outstanding - basic  967,913     1,125,384
Earnings per share - diluted$                           0.16 $                           0.14
Average shares outstanding - diluted 975,670     1,131,539

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
 
2

 
 
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc. 

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited)
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010
                              
                   Unallocated           
  Common Stock           Common Accumulated        
  Number of      Additional       Stock Held Other     Total 
(In thousands, except share  Shares      Paid-in  Treasury   by Benefit Comprehensive  Retained  Stockholders' 
data) Outstanding  Amount   Capital   Stock   Plans  Income  Earnings  Equity 
 
BALANCE – DECEMBER 31, 2009
     1,299,712   $     14   $  13,442   $   (735)  $  (1,323) $      1  $  5,987   $  17,386 
 
Common stock allocated by ESOP
            (2)        52          50      
                                   
Treasury stock purchased  (187,376)          (1,708)             (1,708)    
                                   
Stock based compensation expense           88                  88      
                                   
Release of vested common stock by the Recognition and Retention Plan Trust  (8,529 shares)
          (80)      80          -     
                                   
Cash dividends declared ($0.085 per share)                        (103   (103)    
                                   
Net income                        465   465     
                                   
Unrealized gain on investment securities available for sale, net of deferred taxes                     19       19 
                                   
Comprehensive Income                            $      484     
                                   
BALANCE – September  30, 2010  1,112,336   $     14   $  13,448   $  (2,443)  $  (1,191) $     20  $  6,349   $  16,197 
                   Unallocated               
   Common Stock           Common   Accumulated         
(In thousands, except share  Number of       Additional       Stock Held   Other       Total 
data)  Shares       Paid-in   Treasury     by Benefit   Comprehensive   Retained   Stockholders’ 
   Outstanding   Amount   Capital   Stock   Plans   Income   Earnings   Equity 
 
BALANCE – January 1, 2011
   992,436  $14  $13,478  $(3,636) $(1,173) $(13) $6,521  $15,191 
 
Common stock allocated by ESOP
                    17             17 
                                 
Stock based compensation expense           30                    30 
                                 
Cash dividends declared ($0.03 per share)                           (30)   (30)
                                 
Net income                          157   157 
                                 
Unrealized loss  on investment securities available for sale, net of deferred taxes                       (1)        (1)
                                 
Comprehensive Income                             $156 
                                 
BALANCE – March 31, 2011  992,436  $14  $13,508  $(3,636) $(1,156) $(14) $6,648  $15,364 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
 
3

 
 
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
 
   For the Nine Months Ended 
   September 30, 
   2010    2009 
   (In Thousands) 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities        
Net income $465  $338 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Provision for loan losses
  86   129 
Provision for other real estate losses
  -   9 
Depreciation expense
  41   26 
Net accretion of securities discounts  (7)  (6)
Amortization of deferred loan fees and costs  7   (10)
Deferred income tax  -   3 
Stock-based compensation expense  138   134 
       Changes in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash:        
            Accrued interest receivable  (25)  (52)
            Prepaid expenses and other assets  84   (56)
    Accrued interest payable
  (14)  (9)
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities
  125   50 
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
  900   556 
   For the Three Months Ended 
   March 31, 
   2011   2010 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities        
Net income $157  $153 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Provision for loan losses
  27   29 
Depreciation expense
  13   13 
Net accretion of securities discounts  (2)  (2)
Amortization of deferred loan (fees) and costs  7   (1)
Deferred income taxes  (2)    
Stock-based compensation expense  47   47 
       Changes in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash:        
            Accrued interest receivable  (43)  4 
            Prepaid expenses and other assets  (56)  (11)
    Accrued interest payable
  (3)  (4)
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities
  (208)  (8)
 
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities
  (63)  220 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Net (increase) decrease in investment in interest-earning time deposits  (3,609)  101 
Net decrease in investment in interest-earning time deposits  544   235 
Purchase of investment securities available for sale  (2,775)  -   (613)  (504)
Proceeds from calls of investment securities available for sale  500   2,000 
Principal payments received on mortgage-backed securities held to maturity  1,550   1,477   426   600 
Net increase in loans receivable  (2,402)  (2,041)
Net (increase) decrease in loans receivable  92   (662)
Net decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank stock  38   - 
Capitalized expenditures on other real estate owned  (25)  -   -   (25)
Purchase of premises and equipment  (25)  (1,057)  (43)  (5)
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Investing Activities
  (6,786)  480 
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
  444   (361)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net increase in deposits  10,887   9,279 
Decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank advances  (1,250)  (4,300)
Increase in other borrowings  -   450 
Repayment of other borrowings  (14)  (3)
Dividends paid  (103)  (100)
Purchase of treasury stock  (1,708)  (413)
Decrease in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance  (284)  (239)
   Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities  7,528   4,674 
   Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents  1,642   5,710 
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Beginning of Period  5,420   1,035 
Cash and Cash Equivalents – End of Period $7,062  $6,745 
         
Supplementary Disclosure of Cash Flow and Non-Cash Information:        
Cash payments for interest $1,480  $1,890 
Cash payments for income taxes $235  $250 
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned $260  $208 
Net increase in deposits  1,823   2,901 
Repayment of other borrowings  (6)  (5)
Dividends paid  (30)  (33)
Purchase of treasury stock  -   (1,007)
Decrease in advances from borrowers for taxes and insurance  (253)  (221)
 
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities
  1,534   1,635 
 
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
  1,915   1,494 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents – Beginning of Period
  8,650   5,420 
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents – End of Period
 $10,565  $6,914 
Supplementary Disclosure of Cash Flow and Non-Cash Information:
Cash payments for interest $469  $492 
Cash payments for income taxes $290  $115 
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned $210  $- 
 
 
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
 
4

 
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies
 
Basis of Presentation of Financial Presentation. On July 3, 2007, Quaint Oak Savings Bank completed itsThe Company was formed in connection with the Bank's conversion from a Pennsylvania chartered mutual savings bank to a Pennsylvania chartered stock savings bank and changed its name to Quaint Oak Bank (“Bank”).  In connection with the conversion, Quaint Oak Bank formed Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc., a Pennsylvania chartered corporation (the "Company" or "Quaint Oak Bancorp"), which offered and sold 1,388,625 shares of its common stock at a price of $10.00 per sh are to eligible depositors of the Bank.  Upon completion of the conversion and the offering, all of Quaint Oak Bank's common stock is owned by Quaint Oak Bancorp, and all of Quaint Oak Bancorp's common stock is, in turn, owned by the public.completed on July 3, 2007. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Quaint Oak Bank along with its wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiaries.  At September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Bank has four wholly-owned subsidiaries, Quaint Oak Mortgage, LLC, Quaint Oak Real Estate, LLC, Quaint Oak Abstract, LLC, and Quaint Oak Insurance Agency, LLC, each a Pennsylvania limited liability company.  The mortgage, real estate and abstract companies offer mortgage banking, real estate sales and title abstract services, respectively, in the Lehigh Valley region of Pennsylvania, and began operation in July 2009.  The insurance agency is currently inactive.  In October 2010, the mortgage company also commenced operations at the Bank’s main office.  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
 
The Bank is subject to regulation by the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.  Pursuant to the Bank’s election under Section 10(l) of the Home Owners’ Loan Act, the Company is a savings and loan holding company currently regulated by the Office of Thrift Supervision.  Pursuant to recently-enacted legislation, after July 21, 2011, Quaint Oak Bancorp’s primary federal regulator will be the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.  The market area served by the Bank is principally Bucks County, Pennsylvania and to a lesser extent, Montgomery and Philadelphia Counties in Pennsylvania.  In February 2010, the Bank opened a branch banking office in the Lehigh Valley area of Pennsylvania.  The principal deposit products offered by the Bank are certificates of deposit, passbook savings accounts, statement savings accounts and eSavings accounts.  & #160;Loan products offered are fixed and adjustable rate residential and commercial mortgages, construction loans, home equity loans, auto loans, and lines of credit.
 
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q, as applicable to a smaller reporting company.  Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements.
 
The foregoing consolidated financial statements are unaudited; but in the opinion of management include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation thereof.  The balances as of December 31, 20092010 have been derived from the audited financial statements.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in Quaint Oak Bancorp’s 20092010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The results of operations for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.2011.
 
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements. The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimate s.estimates.  The Company’s most significant estimates are the determination of the allowance for loan losses, the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment of investment and mortgage-backed securities, and the valuation of deferred tax assets.
 
 
 
 
5

 
 
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Loans Receivable.  Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are stated at their outstanding unpaid principal balances, net of an allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees.  Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance.  Loan origination fees and costs are deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the yield (interest income) of the related loans.  The Bank is generally amortizing these amounts over the contractual life of the loan.
The loans receivable portfolio is segmented into residential loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans and consumer loans.  The residential loan segment has two classes: one-to-four family residential owner occupied loans and one-to-four residential family non-owner occupied loans.  The commercial real estate loan segment consists of the following classes: multi-family (five or more) residential, commercial real estate and commercial lines of credit.  Construction loans are generally granted for the purpose of building a single residential home.  The consumer loan segment consists of the following classes: home equity loans and consumer non-real estate loans.  Included in the home equity class are home equity loans and home equity lines of credit.  Included in the consumer non-real estate loans are loans secured by saving accounts and auto loans.
The accrual of interest is generally discontinued when principal or interest has become 90 days past due unless the loan is in the process of collection and is either guaranteed or well secured.  When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest credited to income in the current year is reversed and unpaid interest accrued in prior years is charged against the allowance for loan losses.  Interest received on nonaccrual loans generally is either applied against principal or reported as interest income, according to management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal.  Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and is recorded as a reduction to loans. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. All, or part, of the principal balance of loans receivable are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely. Because all identified losses are immediately charged off, no portion of the allowance for loan losses is restricted to any individual loan or groups of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is based on the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral  value  or  observable  market
6

 
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers pools of loans by loan class. These pools of loans are evaluated for loss exposure based upon historical loss rates for each of these categories of loans, adjusted for qualitative factors. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary lending areas, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are reevaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current economic environment.  Residential mortgage lending generally entails a lower risk of default than other types of lending. Consumer loans and commercial real estate loans generally involve more risk of collectability because of the type and nature of the collateral and, in certain cases, the absence of collateral. It is the Company’s policy to establish a specific reserve for loss on any delinquent loan when it determines that a loss is probable. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.  An allowance for loan losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Company’s impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the loan’s collateral.
A loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if the Company, for economic or legal reasons related to a debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. Concessions granted under a TDR typically involve a temporary or permanent reduction in payments or interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date at less than a current market rate of interest. Loans classified as TDRs are designated as impaired.
For loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily through third-party appraisals. When a real estate secured loan becomes impaired, a decision is made regarding whether an updated certified appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This decision is based on various considerations, including the age of the most recent appraisal, the loan-to-value ratio based on the original appraisal and the condition of the property. Appraised values are discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include estimated costs to sell the property.
7

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
The allowance calculation methodology includes further segregation of loan classes into risk rating categories. The borrower’s overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated annually for all loans (except one-to-four family residential owner-occupied loans) where the total amount outstanding to any borrower or group of borrowers exceeds $500,000, or when credit deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments. Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Loans criticized special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Loans not classified are rated pass. In addition, Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Company’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to management. Based on management’s comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, management believes the current level of the allowance for loan losses is adequate.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock. Federal law requires a member institution of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) system to hold restricted stock of its district Federal Home Loan Bank according to a predetermined formula.  FHLB stock is carried at cost and evaluated for impairment. When evaluating FHLB stock for impairment, its value is determined based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value of the stock. We evaluate our holdings of FHLB stock for impairment each reporting period. No impairment charges were recognized on FHLB stock during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.  In December 2008, the FHLB of Pittsburgh notified member banks that it was suspending dividend payments and restricting the repurchase of capital stock, to preserve capital.  On October 29, 2010, the FHLB of Pittsburgh resumed the repurchase of capital stock and repurchased 39,900 shares of capital stock from the Bank at $1.00 per share.   During the quarter ended March 31, 2011 the FHLB repurchased 37,900 shares of capital stock at $1.00 per share.  Subsequent to March 31, 2011, on April 29, 2011 the FHLB repurchased an additional 36,000 shares of capital stock at $1.00 per share.
Other Real Estate Owned. Other real estate owned or foreclosed assets are comprised of property acquired through a foreclosure proceeding or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure and loans classified as in-substance foreclosures.  A loan is classified as in-substance foreclosure when the Bank has taken possession of the collateral regardless of whether formal foreclosure proceedings take place.  Other real estate properties are initially recorded at fair value, net of estimated selling costs at the date of foreclosure, establishing a new cost basis. After foreclosure, valuations are periodically performed by management and the real estate is carried at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell.  Net revenue and expenses from operations and additions to the valuation allowance are included in other expenses.  Other real estate owned at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was $1.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively.
8

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
Share-Based Compensation.Compensation expense for share-based compensation awards is based on the grant date fair value of the award. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award.
 
At September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Company has two share-based plans; the 2008 Recognition and Retention Plan (“RRP”) and the 2008 Stock Option Plan.  Awards under both plans were made in May 2008.  These plans are more fully described in Note 7.
 
The Company also has an employee stock ownership plan (“ESOP”).  This plan is more fully described in Note 7.  As ESOP shares are committed to be released and allocated among participants, the Company recognizes compensation expense equal to the average market price of the shares over the period earned.
Comprehensive Income (Loss). Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income.  Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the only components of comprehensive income were net income and unrealized gains, net of tax, on available for sale securities.  Unrealized holding gains were $9,000 and $19,000, net of tax, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively.  The Company had no items of other comprehensive income (loss) for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009.
 
Earnings per Share. Amounts reported in earnings per share reflect earnings available to common stockholders’ for the period divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period, exclusive of unearned ESOP shares, unvested restricted stock (RRP) shares and treasury shares.  Stock options and unvested restricted stock are regarded as potential common stock and are considered in the diluted earnings per share calculations to the extent they would have a dilutive effect if converted to common stock, computed using the “treasury stock” method.  For the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, and 2009 and the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, all outstanding stock options (107,570 and 108,311107,718 options, respectively) were antidilutive.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents.  Cash and cash equivalents include non-interest and interest-earning demand deposits and money market accounts with various commercial financial institutions, all of which mature within ninety days.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements.  The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) hasIn January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU)(“ASU”) 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,. This ASU requires some which updates ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. The updated guidance added new requirements for disclosures about transfers into and clarifies someout of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements relating to Level 3 measurements. It also clarified existing disclosure requirements about fair value measurements as set forthdisclosures about the level of disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The amended guidance in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) Subtopic 820-10. The FASB’s objective is to improve these disclosures and, thus, increase transparency in financial reporting. Specifically, ASU 2010-06 amends Codification Subtopic 820-10 to now require:
●  A reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers; and
6

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
●  In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements.
In addition, ASU 2010-06 clarifies the requirements of the following existing disclosures:
For purposes of reporting fair value measurements for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities; and
●  A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements.
ASU 2010-06 iswas effective for the first interim andor annual reporting periodsperiod beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases,requirement to provide the Level 3 activity of purchase, sales, issuance,issuances, and settlements inon a gross basis, which will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures areamended guidance, except for the requirement effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is continuing to evaluate the impact the adoption of the disclosure of the roll forward activity for Level 3 measurements in ASU 2010-06 will have on our financial statements.
In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-18, Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset, which updates ASC 310, Receivable. The amendments in this update affect any entity that acquires loans subject to ASC Subtopic 310-30, Receivables: Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality, that accounts for some or all of those loans within pools, and that subsequently modifies one or more of those loans after acquisition. Under this updated guidance, modifications of loans that are accounted for within a pool under Subtopic 310-30 do not result in the removal of those loans from the pool even if the modification of those loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. The amended guidance is effective prospectively for modifications occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15,January 1, 2010. The Company adopted this guidance effective Julythe additional requirement on January 1, 2010.2011. The adoption isadoptions did not expected to have any impact on our financial position or results of operations.
 
In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, which updated ASC 310, Receivables. The updated guidance requires more robust and disaggregated disclosures about the credit quality of an entity’s financing receivables and its allowance for credit losses, including a rollforward schedule of the allowance for credit losses for the period on a portfolio segment basis, as well as additional information about the aging and credit quality of receivables by class of financing receivab lesreceivables as of the end of the period. The new and amended disclosures that relate to information as of the end of a reporting period will beare effective for the Company as of December 31, 2010. The disclosures that include information for activity that occurs during a reporting period will be effective for the first interim reporting period beginning after December 31, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
9

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Financial Statement Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
In January 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-01, Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20, which temporarily delays the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings in Update 2010-20 for public entities. Under the existing effective date in Update 2010-20, public-entity creditors would have provided disclosures about troubled debt restructurings for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The delay is intended to allow the FASB time to complete its deliberations on what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The effective date of the new disclosures about troubled debt restructurings for public entities and the guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring will then be coordinated. Currently, that guidance is anticipated to be effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2011. The Company is currently evaluatingcontinuing to evaluate the impact that the adoption of this new guidance will have on our financial statement disclosures.
In April 2011, the Company’sFASB issued ASU 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring, which updates ASC 310. This updated clarifies which loan modifications constitute troubled debt restructurings. In evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a troubled debt restructuring, a creditor must separately conclude that both of the following exist: 1) the restructuring constitutes a concession; 2) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulty. The update clarifies the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether it has granted a concession to note that if a debtor does not otherwise have access to funds at a market rate for debt with similar characteristics as the restructured debt, the restructuring would be considered to be at a below-market rate, which may indicate that the creditor has granted a concession. Additionally, a temporary or permanent increase in the contractual interest rate as a result of a restructuring does not preclude the restructuring from being considered a concession because the new contractual interest rate on the restructured debt could still be below the market interest rate for new debt with similar characteristics. Furthermore, a restructuring that results in a delay in payment that is insignificant is not a concession. The update also clarifies the guidance on a creditor’s evaluation of whether a debtor is experiencing financial difficulty to note that a creditor may conclude that a debtor is experiencing financial difficulties, even though the debtor is not currently in payment default. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the first interim or annual period beginning on or after June 15, 2011. The Company is continuing to evaluate this guidance, but does not expect the adoption to have a significant impact on our financial position or results of operations, as we have already implemented these principles in our evaluations of TDRs.
Reclassifications.   Certain items in the 2010 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the presentation in the 2011 consolidated financial statements. Such reclassifications did not have a material impact on the presentation of the overall financial statements.
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
710

 
 
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note 2 – Investment Securities
 
The amortized cost and fair value of investment securities available for sale at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 20092010 are summarized below (in thousands): 
 

 September 30, 2010  March 31, 2011 
 
Amortized Cost
  
Gross Unrealized Gains
  
Gross Unrealized Losses
  
 
Fair Value
  
Amortized Cost
  
Gross Unrealized Gains
  
Gross Unrealized Losses
  
 
Fair Value
 
Available for Sale:                        
U.S. Government agency securities                        
Due after 1 year through 5 years $750  $3  $-  $753  $1,550  $1  $(4) $1,547 
Due after 5 year through 10 years  499   6   -   505   800   -   (11)  789 
Short-term bond fund  1,047   2   -   1,049 
Limited-term bond fund  501   1   -   502    507   -   (10)   497 
Short-term bond funds  1,527   20   -   1,547 
 $3,277  $30  $-  $3,307  $3,904  $3  $(25) $3,882 

 
  December 31, 2009 
  
Amortized Cost
  
Gross Unrealized Gains
  
Gross Unrealized Losses
  
 
Fair Value
 
Available for Sale:            
    U.S. Government agency securities            
       Due after 5 year through 10 years $499  $-  $(1) $498 
    Short-term bond funds   502   2   -    504 
  $1,001  $2  $(1) $1,002 

  December 31, 2010 
  
Amortized Cost
  
Gross Unrealized Gains
  
Gross Unrealized Losses
  
 
Fair Value
 
Available for Sale:            
    U.S. Government agency securities            
       Due after 1 year through 5 years $1,250  $2  $-  $1,252 
       Due after 5 year through 10 years  500   -   (15)  485 
    Short-term bond fund  1,035   2   -   1,037 
    Limited-term bond fund   505   -    (8)   497 
  $3,290  $4  $(23) $3,271 


At March 31, 2011, there were four government agency securities and one bond fund in a gross unrealized loss position that at such date had an aggregated depreciation of 1.35% from the Company’s amortized cost basis.  Management believes that the estimated fair value of the securities disclosed above is primarily dependent on the movement of market interest rates.  Management evaluated the length and time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost; the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, including any specific events which may influence the operations of the issuer.  The Company has the ability and intent to hold these securities until maturity and the Company does not believe it will sell or be required to sell such securities prior to the recovery of the amortized cost basis.  Management does not believe any individual unrealized loss as of March 31, 2011 represents an other-than-temporary impairment.  There were no impairment charges recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010.
11

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note 3 – Mortgage-backed Securities Held to Maturity
 
The amortized cost and fair value of mortgage-backed securities held to maturity at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 20092010 are summarized below (in thousands): 
 
             
  March 31, 2011 
  
Amortized Cost
  
Gross Unrealized Gains
  
Gross Unrealized Losses
  
 
Fair Value
 
Held to Maturity:            
    FNMA pass-through certificates $2,641  $215  $-  $2,856 
    FHLMC pass-through certificates  2,341   174   -   2,515 
     $4,982  $389  $-  $5,371 
                 
                 
  December 31, 2010 
  
Amortized Cost
  
Gross Unrealized Gains
  
Gross Unrealized Losses
  
 
Fair Value
 
Held to Maturity:                
    FNMA pass-through certificates $2,803  $222  $-  $3,025 
    FHLMC pass-through certificates  2,603   182   -   2,785 
     $5,406  $404  $-  $5,810 
             
  September 30, 2010 
  
Amortized Cost
  
Gross Unrealized Gains
  
Gross Unrealized Losses
  
 
Fair Value
 
Held to Maturity:            
    FNMA pass-through certificates $3,301  $254  $-  $3,555 
    FHLMC pass-through certificates  2,885   203   -   3,088 
     $6,186  $527  $-  $6,643 
                 
                 
  December 31, 2009 
  
Amortized Cost
  
Gross Unrealized Gains
  
Gross Unrealized Losses
  
 
Fair Value
 
Held to Maturity:                
    FNMA pass-through certificates $4,071  $211  $-  $4,282 
    FHLMC pass-through certificates  3,660   200   -   3,860 
     $7,731  $411  $-  $8,142 

 
 


 
812

 
 
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.Inc. 

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses

Loans receivable, net consist of the following (in thousands):
  
March 31,
2011
  
December 31,
2010
 
Real estate loans:      
  One-to four-family residential:      
       Owner occupied $13,041  $13,428 
  Non-owner occupied
  27,225   26,263 
          Total one-to-four family residential  40,266   39,691 
         
   Multi-family(five or more)  residential  3,483   3,226 
   Commercial real estate  18,235   18,773 
   Construction  5,657   5,773 
   Commercial lines of  credit  1,618   1,854 
   Home equity loans   5,861    6,181 
          Total real estate loans  75,120   75,498 
         
Auto loans  70   75 
Loans secured by deposits   24    15 
Total loans
  75,214   75,588 
         
Deferred loan fees and costs
  (17)  (7)
       Allowance for loan losses   (823)   (871)
Net loans
 $ 74,374  $ 74,710 

  
September 30,
2010
  
December 31,
2009
 
Real estate loans:      
  One-to four-family residential:      
       Owner occupied $14,233  $15,388 
  Non-owner occupied
  26,429   25,133 
          Total one-to-four family residential  40,662   40,521 
         
   Multi-family residential  3,279   3,127 
   Commercial real estate  18,615   18,617 
   Construction  4,872   3,536 
   Commercial lines of  credit  1,711   1,197 
   Home equity loans   6,460    6,445 
          Total real estate loans  75,599   73,443 
         
Auto loans  82   78 
Loans secured by deposits   11    13 
Total loans
  75,692   73,534 
         
Deferred loan fees and costs
  6   29 
       Allowance for loan losses   (921)   (835)
Net loans
 $ 74,777  $ 72,728 
As of March 31, 2011, there were three loans held for sale totaling $440,000 included in the one-to-four family residential owner occupied loans category.
 
Following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
 
  
March 31,
2011
  
March 31,
2010
 
Balance, beginning of the year $871  $835 
     Provision for loan losses  27   29 
     Charge-offs  (75)  - 
Recoveries
   -    - 
          Net charge-offs  (75)   - 
         
Balance, end of period $823  $864 
  
September 30,
2010
  
September 30,
2009
 
Balance, beginning of the year $835  $689 
     Provision for loan losses  86   129 
     Charge-offs  -   (12)
Recoveries
  -   - 
          (Charge-offs)/recoveries, net  -   (12)
         
Balance, end of period $921  $806 



 
The provision for loan losses is charged to expense to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level that management considers adequate to provide for losses based upon an evaluation of the loan portfolio, including an evaluation of impaired loans, that considers a number of factors such as past loan loss experience, adverse situations that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, current economic conditions and other factors affecting the known and inherent risk in the portfolio. Management’s evaluation of these factors is done separately for each type of loan. A loan is considered to be impaired when, based upon current inform ation and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. An insignificant delay or insignificant shortfall in amount of payments does not necessarily result in the loan being identified as impaired. For this purpose, delays less than 90 days are generally considered to be insignificant. During the periods presented, loan impairment was evaluated based on the fair value of the loans’ collateral. The determination of fair value for the collateral underlying a loan is more fully described in Note 8. Impairment losses are included in the provision for loan losses. Large groups of smaller balance, homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment, except for those loans restructured under a troubled debt restructuring. Loans collectively evaluated for impairment include smaller balance commercial real estate loans, residential real estate loans and consumer loans.

 
 
913

 
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.Inc. 

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)

AsThe following table presents the classes of September 30, 2010the loan portfolio summarized by the aggregate pass rating and the classified ratings of special mention, substandard and doubtful within the Company’s internal risk rating system as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2009,2010 are summarized below (in thousands): 

  March 31, 2011 
  
Pass
  
Special Mention
  
Substandard
  
Doubtful
  
Total
 
    
One-to-four family residential owner occupied $11,697  $234  $642  $468  $13,041 
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied  26,084   57   994   90   27,225 
Multi-family residential  3,279   204   -   -   3,483 
Commercial real estate and lines of credit  19,492   361   -   -   19,853 
Construction  5,657   -   -   -   5,657 
Home equity  5,223   96   542   -   5,861 
Consumer non-real estate   80    -    14    -    94 
  $71,512  $952  $2,192  $558  $75,214 


  December 31, 2010 
  
Pass
  
Special Mention
  
Substandard
  
Doubtful
  
Total
 
    
One-to-four family residential owner occupied $12,139  $742  $79  $468  $13,428 
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied  24,700   109   1,079   375   26,263 
Multi-family residential  3,022   204   -   -   3,226 
Commercial real estate and lines of credit  20,202   318   107   -   20,627 
Construction  5,773   -   -   -   5,773 
Home equity  5,757   350   74   -   6,181 
Consumer non-real estate   75    -    15    -    90 
  $71,668  $1,723  $1,354  $843  $75,588 

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.  Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.  Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.  An allowance for loan losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Company’s impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of the loan’s collateral.

14

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
The following table summarizes information in regards to impaired loans by loan portfolio class as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
  March 31, 2011 
     Unpaid      Average    Interest 
  Recorded  Principal  Related   Recorded   Income 
  Investment  Balance   Allowance   Investment   Recognized 
 
With no related allowance recorded:
               
   One-to-four family residential owner occupied $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
   One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied  -   -   -   -   - 
     Multi-family residential  -   -   -   -   - 
        Commercial real estate and lines of credit  -   -   -   -   - 
     Construction  -   -   -   -   - 
     Home equity  -   -   -   -   - 
     Consumer non-real estate  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
With an allowance recorded:                    
   One-to-four family residential owner occupied $1,110  $1,110  $121  $1,081  $3 
   One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied  1,084   1,084   61   1,085   12 
     Multi-family residential and lines of credit  -   -   -   -   - 
        Commercial real estate  -   -   -   -   - 
     Construction  -   -   -   -   - 
     Home equity  542   542   30   546   8 
     Consumer non-real estate  14   14   1   15   - 
                     
Total:                    
   One-to-four family residential owner occupied $1,110  $1,110  $121  $1,081  $3 
   One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied  1,084   1,084   61   1,085   12 
     Multi-family residential and lines of credit  -   -   -   -   - 
        Commercial real estate  -   -   -   -   - 
     Construction  -   -   -   -   - 
     Home equity  542   542   30   546   8 
     Consumer non-real estate  14   14   1   15   - 
                     



15

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
  December 31, 2010 
     Unpaid     Average  Interest 
  Recorded  Principal  Related  Recorded  Income 
  Investment  Balance  Allowance  Investment  Recognized 
With no related allowance recorded:               
   One-to-four family residential owner occupied $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
   One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied  -   -   -   -   - 
     Multi-family residential  -   -   -   -   - 
        Commercial real estate and lines of credit  -   -   -   -   - 
     Construction  -   -   -   -   - 
     Home equity  -   -   -   -   - 
     Consumer non-real estate  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
With an allowance recorded:                    
   One-to-four family residential owner occupied $547  $547  $108  $547  $12 
   One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied  1,454   1,454   136   1,462   76 
     Multi-family residential and lines of credit  -   -   -   -   - 
        Commercial real estate  107   107   1   108   6 
     Construction  -   -   -   -   - 
     Home equity  74   74   25   75   5 
     Consumer non-real estate  15   15   1   18   1 
                     
Total:                    
   One-to-four family residential owner occupied $546  $546  $108  $547  $12 
   One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied  1,454   1,454   136   1,462   76 
     Multi-family residential and lines of credit  -   -   -   -   - 
        Commercial real estate  107   107   1   108   6 
     Construction  -   -   -   -   - 
     Home equity  74   74   25   75   5 
     Consumer non-real estate  15   15   1   18   1 
                     

At March 31, 2011, the Company had eleven loans totaling $920,000 identified as troubled debt restructurings (TDRs) consisting of five one-to-four family residential non-owner occupied loans totaling $539,000, four home equity loans totaling $302,000, and two one-to-four family residential owner occupied loans in the amount of $79,000.  All eleven loans were classified as impaired.  At December 31, 2010, the Company had six loans totaling $501,000 identified as TDRs consisting of three non-owner family residential occupied loans totaling $371,000, two one-to-four family residential owner occupied loans in the amount of $79,000, and one home equity loan in the amount of $51,000.  All six loans were classified as impaired.  Such loans have been classified as TDRs since we modified the payment terms from the original agreements and allowed the borrowers to make interest only payments in order to relieve some of their overall cash flow burden.

16

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
Following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans that were considered to be impaired was as follows.receivable for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (in thousands):
 
  
       September 30,
      2010
  
December 31,
2009
 
 Impaired collateral-dependent loans with a valuation allowance $1,388  $- 
 Impaired collateral-dependent loans with no valuation allowance   -   - 
  $1,338  $- 
         
 Valuation allowance on impaired loans $173  $- 
         
March 31, 2011
1-4 Family
Residential
Owner
Occupied 
1-4 Family
Residential
Non-
Owner
Occupied 
 Multi-
Family
Residential
Commercial
Real Estate
and Lines of
Credit 
Construction 
Home
Equity 
Consumer
Non-Real
Estate 
Unallocated Total 
Allowance for loan
losses:
Beginning balance $185  $335  $23  $155  $40  $92  $1  $40  $871 
    Charge-offs  -   (75)  -   -   -   -   -   -   (75)
    Recoveries  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
    Provision  7   24   1   (6)   -    -   -   1   27 
Ending balance $192  $284  $24  $149  $40  $92  $1  $41  $823 
Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment $  121  $  61  $  -  $  -  $  -  $  30  $  1  $  -  $  213 
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment $  71  $  223  $  24  $  149  $  40  $  62  $  -  $  41  $  610 

Loans receivable:
Ending balance $13,041  $27,225  $3,483  $19,853  $5,657  $5,861  $94  $75,214 
Ending balance:
Individually
evaluated for
impairment
 $  1,110  $  1,084  $  -  $  -  $  -  $  542  $  14  $  2,750 
Ending balance:
collectively
evaluated for
impairment
 $  11,931  $  26,141  $  3,483  $  19,853  $  5,657  $  5,319  $  80  $  72,464 
17

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
Following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in loans receivable as of December 31, 2010 (in thousands):
December 31, 2010
1-4 Family
Residential
Owner
Occupied 
1-4 Family
Residential
Non-
Owner
Occupied 
 Multi-
Family
Residential
Commercial
Real Estate
and Lines of
Credit 
Construction 
Home
Equity 
Consumer
Non-Real
Estate 
Unallocated Total 
Allowance for loan
losses:
Beginning balance $83  $202  $22  $194  $35  $41  $1  $256  $834 
    Charge-offs  -   (78)  -   -   -   -   -   -   (78)
    Recoveries  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
    Provision  102   211    1   (39)   5   51    -   (216)  115 
Ending balance $185  $335  $23  $155  $40  $92  $1  $40  $871 
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment $  108  $  136  $  -  $  1  $  -  $  25  $  1  $  -  $  271 
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment $  77  $  199  $  23  $  154  $  40  $  67  $  -  $  40  $  600 
Loans receivable:
Ending balance $13,428  $26,263  $3,226  $20,627  $5,773  $6,181  $90  $75,588 
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment $  547  $  1,454  $  -  $  107  $  -  $  74  $  15  $  2,197 
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment $  12,881  $  24,809  $  3,226  $  20,520  $  5,773  $  6,107  $  75  $  73,391 

 
Our
18

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
For all classes of loans receivable, the accrual of interest is generally discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has become 90 days past due or management has serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest, even though the loan is currently performing. A loan may remain on accrual status if it is in the process of collection and is either guaranteed or well secured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid accrued interest is reversed and charged against income in the current year.  Interest received on nonaccrual loans including impaired loans generally is either applied against principal or reported as interest income, according to management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal. Generally, loans are restored to accrual status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period of time (as determined by management) and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in doubt. The past due status of all classes of loans receivable is determined based on contractual due dates for loan payments.
The following table presents nonaccrual loans by classes of the loan portfolio at September 30, 2010 included an aggregateas of $1.4 million of impaired loans compared to $ -0- impaired loans atMarch 31, 2011 and December 31, 2009. Non-accrual loans at September 30, 2010 amounted to approximately $2.0 million, compare to $ -0- at December 31, 2009. Our impaired loans at September 30, 2010 included one home equity loan with an outstanding balance of $52,000 that was continuing to accrue interest. The other impaired loans at September 30, 2010 were on non-accrual status. (in thousands):

  
March 31, 2011
  
December 31, 2010
 
One-to-four family residential owner occupied $1,054  $539 
One-to-four family residential non-owner occupied  431   422 
Multi-family residential  -   - 
Commercial real estate and lines of credit  -   - 
Construction  -   - 
Home equity  240   23 
Consumer non-real estate   -    - 
  $1,725  $984 

Non-performing loans, which consist of non-accruing loans plus accruing loans 90 days or more past due, amounted to $2.4 and $1.5 million at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2009 amounted to approximately $2.5 million and $925,000,2010, respectively.  For the delinquent loans in our portfolio, we have considered our ability to coll ectcollect the past due interest, as well as the principal balance of the loan, in order to determine whether specific loans should be placed on non-accrual status. In cases where our evaluations have determined that the principal and interest balances are collectible, we have continued to accrue interest. At September 30, 2010 we had $508,000 of loans that were 90 days or more past due, but still accruing interest compared to $925,000 at December 31, 2009.
 
We had five troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) at September 30,For the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, totaling $431,000 compared to eight TDRs at Decemberapproximately $11,000 and $-0- in interest income was recognized on non-accrual loans. Interest income foregone on non-accrual loans was approximately $20,000 and $19,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 totaling $1.5 million.  All of the TDRs at September 30,2011 and 2010, were modified during the year to allow a period of interest-only payments. The loans have continued to pay in accordance with their modified contractual terms, and based on the loan-to-value ratios of these loans, approximately $2,000 of the allowance for loan losses was allocated to these loans at September 30, 2010.respectively.

 
 
 
 
 
1019

 
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.Inc. 

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 4 - Loans Receivable, Net and Allowance for Loan Losses (Continued)
 
The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by the analyzing the age of the loans receivable as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following table presents the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the past due status as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):


  
March 31, 2011
 
  
30-90
Days Past Due
  
Greater
than 90
Days
  
 
Total
Past Due
  
 
 
Current
  
 
Total Loans Receivable
  
Loans Receivable > 90 Days and Accruing
 
    
One-to-four family residential owner occupied $284  $284  $568  $12,473  $13,041  $284 
One-to-four family residential non-owner 
   occupied
   1,150    340    1,490    25,735    27,225    340 
Multi-family residential  368   -   368   3,115   3,483   - 
Commercial real estate and lines of credit  1,659   -   1,659   18,194   19,853   - 
Construction  320   -   320   5,337   5,657   - 
Home equity  528   74   602   5,259   5,861   74 
Consumer non-real estate   14    -    14    80    94    - 
  $4,323  $698  $5,021  $70,193  $75,214  $698 



  
December 31, 2010
 
  
30-90
Days Past Due
  
Greater
than 90
Days
  
 
Total
Past Due
  
 
 
Current
  
 
Total Loans Receivable
  
Loans Receivable > 90 Days and Accruing
 
    
One-to-four family residential owner occupied $810  $61  $871  $12,557  $13,428  $61 
One-to-four family residential non-owner
    occupied
   1,106    353    1,459    24,804    26,263    353 
Multi-family residential  204   -   204   3,022   3,226   - 
Commercial real estate and lines of credit  1,061   108   1,169   19,458   20,627   108 
Construction  -   -   -   5,773   5,773   - 
Home equity  437   -   437   5,744   6,181   - 
Consumer non-real estate   15    -    15    75    90    - 
  $3,633  $522  $4,155  $71,433  $75,588  $522 


20

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 5 – Deposits
 
Deposits consist of the following classifications (in thousands):

  
March 31,
2011
  
December 31, 2010
 
Passbook savings accounts $3,092  $3,079 
Statement savings accounts  6,932   6,798 
eSavings accounts  2,706   2,253 
Certificates of deposit  68,784   67,561 
     Total deposits $81,514  $79,691 
         
  
September 30,
2010
  
December 31,
2009
 
 Passbook savings accounts $3,191  $3,277 
 Statement savings accounts  6,765   6,508 
 eSavings accounts  1,870   1,978 
 Certificates of deposit  67,313   56,489 
      Total deposits $79,139  $68,252 
         

Note 6 – Federal Home Loan Bank Advances and Other Borrowings–Borrowings
 
Federal Home Loan Bank advances consist of the following at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 (in thousands):

 
 
 
 
 
Maturity Period
 Amount  
Weighted
Interest
Rate
 
   1 to 12 months $1,800   3.66%
 13 to 24 months  1,800   3.98%
 25 to 36 months  2,000   4.19%
     Total $5,600   3.95%
 
 
 
 
Maturity Period
 Amount  
Weighted
Interest Rate
 
  1 to 12 months $1,800   3.66%
13 to 24 months  1,800   3.98%
37 to 48 months  2,000   4.19%
    Total $5,600   3.95%

In June 2009, the Company borrowed $450,000 from a commercial bank to finance the purchase of a building in Allentown, Pennsylvania which serves as the offices for the three new active subsidiaries and a branch banking office.office which opened in February 2010.  The loan has an interest rate of 5.75%, matures on July 1, 2014 and is amortizing over 180 months. The balance on the loan was $428,000$417,000 and $442,000$423,000 at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2009,2010, respectively.
 
 
Note 7 – Stock Compensation Plans
 
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
 
The Company adopted an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) during fiscal 2007 for the benefit of employees who meet the eligibility requirements of the plan.  Using proceeds from a loan from the Company, the ESOP purchased 8%, or 111,090 shares of the Company’s then outstanding common stock in the open market at an average price of $9.35 for a total of $1.0 million.  The Bank makes cash contributions to the ESOP on a quarterly basis sufficient to enable the ESOP to make the required loan payments to the Company.  The loan bears an interest rate of 7.75% per annum, with principal and interest to be paid quarterly in equal installments over 15 years. The loan is secured by the unallocated shares of common stock held by the ESOP.
 

11

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 – Stock Compensation Plans (Continued)
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Continued)
Shares of the Company’s common stock purchased by the ESOP are held in a suspense account and reported as unallocated common stock held by the ESOP in stockholders’ equity until released for allocationforallocation to participants.  As the debt is repaid,  shares  are  released  from  collateral
21

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 – Stock Compensation Plans (Continued)
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Continued)
and are allocated to each eligible participant based on the ratio of each such participant’s base compensation to the total base compensation of eligible plan participants.  As the unearned shares are committed to be released and allocated among participants, the Company recognizes compensation expense equal to the average market value of the shares, and the shares become outstanding for earnings per share computations.  During each of the three months a nd nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 the Company recognized $16,000 and $50,000$17,000 of ESOP expense, respectively. During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recognized $16,000 and $45,000 of ESOP expense, respectively.expense.
 
Recognition & Retention Plan
 
In May 2008, the shareholders of Quaint Oak Bancorp approved the adoption of the 2008 Recognition and Retention Plan (the “RRP”) and Trust Agreement.  In order to fund the RRP, the 2008 Recognition and Retention Plan Trust (the “RRP Trust”) acquired 55,545 shares of the Company’s stock in the open market at an average price of $9.36 totaling $520,000.  Pursuant to the RRP, 43,324 shares acquired by the RRP Trust were granted to certain officers, employees and directors of the Company in May 2008, with 12,221 shares remaining available for future grant.  Due to the forfeiture of shares by formercertain employees in addition to unawarded shares, as of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, 12,459 shares remain available for future gran t.grant.  The RRP share awards have vesting periods from five to seven years.  On May 14, 2010 and 2009, the first awards vested totaling 8,529 shares and 8,588 shares, respectively, vested and were released from the RRP trust.shares.
 
A summary of the status of the shares under the RRP as of September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009 and changes during the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
 
 September 30, 2010  September 30, 2009  
March 31, 2011
  
March 31, 2010
 
 
Number of
Shares
  
Weighted
Average Grant
 Date Fair Value
 
Number of
Shares
  
       Weighted
    Average Grant
   Date Fair Value
  
Number of
Shares
  
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value
Number of
Shares
  
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value
 
Unvested at the beginning of the year  34,498  $9.05   43,324  $9.05   25,969  $9.05   34,498  $9.05 
Granted  --   --   --   --   -   -   -   - 
Vested  (8,529)  9.05   (8,588)  9.05   -   -   -   - 
Forfeited  --   --   --   --   -   -   -   - 
Unvested at the end of the period
  25,969  $9.05   34,736  $9.05   25,969  $9.05   34,498  $9.05 


The weighted average grant date fair value is the last sale price as quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board on May 14, 2008.  Compensation expense on the RRP shares granted is recognized ratably over the five to seven year vesting period in an amount which is equal to the fair value of the common stock at the date of grant.  During the three months and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010, $19,000 and $57,000, respectively, in compensation expense was recognized.  A tax benefit of approximately $6,000 and $19,000, respectively, was recognized during each of these periods.  During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009, $20,000 and $58,000, respectively, in compensation expense was recognized.  A tax benefit of approximately $7,000 and $20,000, respectively, was recognized during these periods.
12

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 – Stock Compensation Plans (Continued)
As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, approximately $206,000$168,000 in additional compensation expense will be recognized over the remaining service period of approximately 2.72.2 years.
 
 
22

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 7 – Stock Compensation Plans (Continued)
Stock Options
 
In May 2008, the shareholders of Quaint Oak Bancorp approved the adoption of the 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “Option Plan”).  The Option Plan authorizes the grant of stock options to officers, employees and directors of the Company to acquire 138,863 shares of common stock with an exercise price no less than the fair market value on the date of the grant.  The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors determined to grant the stock options in May 2008 at an exercise price equal to $10.00 per share which is higher than the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date.  All incentive stock options issued under the Option Plan are intended to comply with the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Co de.Code.  Options will become vested and exercisable over a five to seven year period and are generally exercisable for a period of ten years after the grant date.  Pursuant to the Option Plan, 108,311 stock options were granted to certain officers, employees and directors of the Company in May 2008. Due to forfeiture of stock options by certain employees in addition to unawarded stock options, as of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, 31,293 stock options remain available for future grant.
 
A summary of option activity under the Company’s Option Plan as of September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009 and changes during the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009 is as follows:

 
September 30, 2010
  
September 30, 2009
     
March 31, 2011
  
March 31, 2010
    
 
Number of
Shares
  
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
  
Number of
Shares
  
Weighted
 Average
 Exercise
 Price
  
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)
  
Number of
Shares
  
Weighted
Average Exercise
Price
  
Number of
Shares
  
Weighted
 Average
 Exercise
    Price
  
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)
 
Outstanding at the beginning of the year  107,718  $10.00   108,311  $10.00   8.4   107,570  $10.00   107,718  $10.00   7.4 
Granted  --   --   --   --   --   --   --   --   --   -- 
Exercised  --   --   --   --   --   --   --   --   --   -- 
Forfeited  (148)   --   --    --   --   --    --   --    --   -- 
Outstanding at the end of the period  107,570  $10.00   108,311  $10.00   7.6   107,570  $10.00   107,718  $10.00   7.1 
Exercisable at the end of the period  42,666  $10.00   21,481  $10.00   7.6   42,666  $10.00   21,333       7.1 

During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and nine months ended September 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009, approximately $10,000 and $31,000, respectively for both years, was recognized in compensation expense for the 2008 Option Plan.was recognized.  A tax benefit of approximately $2,000 and $6,000, respectively, was recognized during each of these periods.  As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, approximately $111,000$90,000 in additional compensation expense for awarded options remained unrecognized.  This expense will be recognized over the remaining service period of approximately 2.72.2 years.
 
 
Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments
 
The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures.  In accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures topic of FASB ASC 820, the fair value of a financial instrument is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices.  However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments.  In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques.  Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows.  Accordingly, the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.
 
 

 
1323

 
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.Inc. 

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)
 
The fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate.  In such circumstances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment.  The fair value is a reasonable point within the rang erange that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.
 
The fair value guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value.  The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements).  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
 
 Level 1:Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
 
 Level 2:Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
 
 Level 3:Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity).
 
An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
 
The table below presents the balances of assets presented at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 20092010 (in thousands):
 
 
September 30, 2010
  
March 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
Total Fair Value
  
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
 
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  
 
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  
 
 
Total Fair
Value
  
Quoted Prices in Active Markets
 for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant Other Observable
 Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Investment securities available for sale:      
U.S. Government agency securities $1,258  $-  $1,258  $-  $2,336  $-  $2,336  $- 
Short-term bond fund  1,049   1,049   -   - 
Limited-term bond fund  502   -   502   -    497    497    -   - 
Short-term bond funds  1,547   -   1,547   - 
 $3,307  $-  $3,307  $-  $3,882  $1,546  $2,336  $- 

 
  
December 31, 2010
 
  
 
 
Total Fair
Value
  
Quoted Prices in Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
   Investment securities available for sale:   
U.S. Government agency securities $1,737  $-  $1,737  $- 
Short-term bond fund  1,037   1,037   -   - 
Limited-term bond fund   497    497    -   - 
  $3,271  $1,534  $1,737  $- 
 
 
1424

 
Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.Inc. 

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
 
Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)
  
December 31, 2009
 
  
 
 
 
Total Fair Value
  
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
 
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  
 
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Investment securities available for sale:   
U.S. Government agency securities $498  $-  $498  $- 
Short-term bond funds   504   -    504   - 
  $1,002  $-  $1,002  $- 
 
For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that were still held at the end of the period, the following table provides the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 20092010 (in thousands):
 
 
September 30, 2010
  
March 31, 2011
 
 
 
 
 
 
Carrying Amount
  
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
 
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  
 
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  
 
 
 
Carrying Amount
  
Quoted Prices in Active Markets
 for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
      
Impaired loans $1,338  $-  $-  $1,338  $2,537  $-  $-  $2,537 
                                
Other real estate owned $1,198  $-  $-  $1,198  $1,401  $-  $-  $1,401 
                                

 
  
December 31, 2009
 
  
 
 
 
 
Carrying Amount
  
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
 
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  
 
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
    
Other real estate owned $913  $-  $-  $913 
                 
  
December 31, 2010
 
  
 
 
 
Carrying Amount
  
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
 
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant Other Observable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
    
Impaired loans $1,926  $-  $-  $1,926 
                 
Other real estate owned $1,191  $-  $-  $1,191 
                 
 
A loan is considered to be impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan. An insignificant delay or insignificant shortfall in the amount of payments does not necessarily result in the loan being identified as impaired. We establish an allowance on certain impaired loans for the amount by which the discounted cash flows, observable market price or fair value of collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent, is lower than the carrying value of the loan. Fair value is generally based upon independent market prices or appraised value of the collateral. During the periods presented, loan impairment was evaluated based on the fa irfair value of the loans’ collateral. Our appraisals are typically performed by independent third party appraisers, and are obtained as soon as practicable once indicators of possible impairment are identified. Our impaired loans at September 30,March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are included in Level 3 fair value based onupon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
 

15

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)
Real estate properties acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure are to be sold and are carried at fair value less estimated cost to sell.  Fair value is based upon independent market prices or appraised value of the property, net of selling costs.  These assets are included in Level 3 fair value based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
 
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2009:2010:
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents (Carried at Cost)
 
The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and short-term instruments approximate those assets’ fair values.
25

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)
 
 
Interest Earning Time Deposits (Carried at Cost)
 
Fair values for interest-earning time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.  The Company generally purchases amounts below the insured limit, limiting the amount of credit risk on these time deposits.
 
 
Investment and Mortgage-Backed Securities
 
The fair value of securities available for sale (carried at fair value) and held to maturity (carried at amortized cost) are determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (Level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.
 
 
Loans Receivable (Carried at Cost)
 
The fair values of loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market rates at the balance sheet date that reflect the credit and interest rate-risk inherent in the loans.  Projected future cash flows are calculated based upon contractual maturity or call dates, projected repayments and prepayments of principal.  Generally, for variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.
 
 
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock (Carried at Cost)
 
The carrying amount of restricted investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock approximates fair value, and considers the limited marketability of such securities.

16

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)
 
Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable (Carried at Cost)
 
The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable approximates its fair value.
 
 
Deposit Liabilities (Carried at Cost)
 
The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest checking, passbook savings statement savings and eSavingsmoney market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered in the market on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.
 
 
Short-Term Borrowings (Carried at Cost)
 
The carrying amounts of short-term borrowings approximate their fair values.

26

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)
 
 
Long-Term Debt and Other Borrowings (Carried at Cost)
 
Fair values of FHLB advances and other borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, based on quoted prices for new FHLB advances and other borrowings with similar credit risk characteristics, terms and remaining maturity.  These prices obtained from this active market represent a market value that is deemed to represent the transfer price if the liability were assumed by a third party.
 
 
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments (Disclosed at Cost)
 
Fair values for the Bank’s off-balance sheet financial instruments (lending commitments) are based on fees currently charged in the market to enter into similar agreements, taking into account, the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.
 
 
The following information is an estimate of the fair value of a limited portion of the Company’s assets and liabilities.  Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Company’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful.
 
17

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of Financial Instruments (Continued)
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 20092010 (in thousands):
 
 September 30, 2010  December 31, 2009  March 31, 2011  December 31, 2010 
  Carrying   Estimated   Carrying   Estimated  
 Carrying
Amount
  
 Estimated
Fair Value
  
 Carrying
Amount
  
 Estimated
Fair Value
 
 Amount   Fair Value   Amount   Fair Value  (In Thousands) 
Assets:                        
Cash and cash equivalents $7,062  $7,062  $5,420  $5,420  $10,565  $10,656  $8,650  $8,650 
Investment in interest-earning time deposits  6,762   6,783   3,153   3,157   5,457   5,478   6,001   6,019 
Investment securities available for sale  3,307   3,307   1,002   1,002   3,882   3,882   3,271   3,271 
Mortgage-backed securities held to maturity  6,186   6,643   7,731   8,142   4,982   5,371   5,406   5,810 
Loans receivable, net  74,777   76,706   72,728   74,175   74,374   75,630   74,710   76,212 
Investment in FHLB stock  797   797   797   797   719   719   757   757 
Accrued interest receivable  422   422   397   397   466   466   423   423 
                                
Liabilities:                                
Deposits  79,139   79,839   68,252   68,917   81,514   82,158   79,691   80,526 
FHLB advances, long-term  3,800   4,057   5,600   5,854   3,800   3,998   3,800   4,020 
FHLB advances, short-term  1,800   1,800   1,250   1,250   1,800   1,800   1,800   1,800 
Other borrowings  428   428   442   442   417   417   423   423 
Accrued interest payable  103   103   117   117   104   104   107   107 
                                
Off-balance sheet financial instruments  --   --   --   --   -   -   -   - 
                                

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument.  These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion
27

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements and Fair Values of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on many judgments.Financial Instruments (Continued)
 
These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision.  Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.  Fair value estimates are based on existing on and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments.  Significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments include deferred income taxes and premises and equipment.  In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.
 
 
 
 
 
 
1828

 

Quaint Oak Bancorp, Inc.

 
ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
               OPERATIONS
 
Forward-Looking Statements Are Subject to Change
 
We make certain statements in this document as to what we expect may happen in the future. These statements usually contain the words "believe," "estimate," "project," "expect," "anticipate," "intend" or similar expressions. Because these statements look to the future, they are based on our current expectations and beliefs. Actual results or events may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. You should be aware that our current expectations and beliefs as to future events are subject to change at any time, and we can give you no assurances that the future events will actually occur.
 
General
 
The Company was formed in connection with the Bank’s conversion to a stock savings bank completed on July 3, 2007.  The Company’s results of operations are dependent primarily on the results of the Bank, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.  The Bank’s results of operations depend, to a large extent, on net interest income, which is the difference between the income earned on its loan and investment portfolios and the cost of funds, consisting of the interest paid on deposits and borrowings.  Results of operations are also affected by provisions for loan losses, fee income and other non-interest income and non-interest expense.  Non-interest expense principally consists of compensation, directors’ fees and expenses, office occupancy and equipment expense, profe ssionalprofessional fees, FDIC deposit insurance assessment and other expenses.  Our results of operations are also significantly affected by general economic and competitive conditions, particularly changes in interest rates, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities.  Future changes in applicable law, regulations or government policies may materially impact our financial condition and results of operations.
 
At September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 the Bank had four subsidiaries, Quaint Oak Mortgage, LLC, Quaint Oak Real Estate, LLC, Quaint Oak Abstract, LLC, and Quaint Oak Insurance Agency, LLC, each a Pennsylvania limited liability company.  The mortgage, real estate and abstract companies offer mortgage banking, real estate sales and title abstract services, respectively, in the Lehigh Valley region of Pennsylvania, and began operation in July 2009.  The insurance agency is currently inactive.  The mortgage company also began operating at our main office in October 2010.  In connection with the expansion into these activities, the Company acq uiredacquired an office building in Allentown, Pennsylvania from which the subsidiaries operate.  The Bank also opened a new branch office at this location in February 2010.
 
Critical Accounting Policies
 
The accounting and financial reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and to general practices within the banking industry. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements require certain estimates, judgments, and assumptions, which are believed to be reasonable, based upon the information available. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the periods presented. The following accounting policies comprise those that management believes are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial resu lts.results. These policies require numerous estimates or economic assumptions that may prove inaccurate or may be subject to variations which may significantly affect our reported results and financial condition for the period or in future periods.
 

29

Allowance for Loan Losses.  The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date and is established throughrecorded as a reduction to loans. The allowance for loan losses is increased by the provision for loan losses, chargedand decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to expense. Loansbe uncollectible are charged against the allowance for loan losses, when management believes thatand subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the collectibilityallowance. All, or part, of the principal balance of loans receivable are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely. Subsequent recoveriesBecause all identified losses are addedimmediately charged off, no portion of the allowance for loan losses is restricted to any individual loan or groups of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably anticipated. Management performs a quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is an amount that management believes will coverbased on the Company’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent lossesrisks in the loan portfolio, based on evaluations of the collectibility of loans. The evaluations take into consideration such factors as changes in the types and amount of loans in the loan portfolio, historical loss experience, adverse situation ssituations that may affect the borrower'sborrower’s ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, estimated losses relating to specifically identified loans, andcomposition of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions.conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
    The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers pools of loans by loan class. These pools of loans are evaluated for loss exposure based upon historical loss rates for each of these categories of loans, adjusted for qualitative factors. These significant factors may include changes in lending policies and procedures, changes in existing general economic and business conditions affecting our primary lending areas, credit quality trends, collateral value, loan volumes and concentrations, seasoning of the loan portfolio, recent loss experience in particular segments of the portfolio, duration of the current business cycle and bank regulatory examination results. The applied loss factors are reevaluated quarterly to ensure their relevance in the current economic environment. Residential mortgage lending generally entails a lower risk of default than other types of lending. Consumer loans and commercial real estate loans generally involve more risk of collectability because of the type and nature of the collateral and, in certain cases, the absence of collateral. It is the Company’s policy to establish a specific reserve for loss on any delinquent loan when it determines that a loss is probable. An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including among others, exposure to default,the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and timinginterest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis by either the present value of expected future cash flows ondiscounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.  An allowance for loan losses is established for an impaired loan if its carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value. The estimated fair values of substantially all of the Company’s impaired loans are measured based on the estimated fair value of collateral, estimated losses on our commercial and residential loan portfolios and general amounts for historical loss experience.  All of these estimates may be susceptible to significant change.
the loan’s collateral.
 
 
1930

 
While management usesA loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if the best information availableCompany, for economic or legal reasons related to make loan loss allowance evaluations, adjustmentsa debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the allowance may be necessarydebtor that it would not otherwise consider. Concessions granted under a TDR typically involve a temporary or permanent reduction in payments or interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date at less than a current market rate of interest. Loans classified as TDRs are designated as impaired.
For loans secured by real estate, estimated fair values are determined primarily through third-party appraisals. When a real estate secured loan becomes impaired, a decision is made regarding whether an updated certified appraisal of the real estate is necessary. This decision is based on changesvarious considerations, including the age of the most recent appraisal, the loan-to-value ratio based on the original appraisal and the condition of the property. Appraised values are discounted to arrive at the estimated selling price of the collateral, which is considered to be the estimated fair value. The discounts also include estimated costs to sell the property.
The allowance calculation methodology includes further segregation of loan classes into risk rating categories. The borrower’s overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated annually for all loans (except one-to-four family residential owner-occupied loans) where the total amount outstanding to any borrower or group of borrowers exceeds $500,000, or when credit deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments. Credit quality risk ratings include regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Loans criticized special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in economicdeterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and otherpaying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions or changes in accounting guidance. Historically, our estimates ofand facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged to the allowance for loan losses havelosses. Loans not required significant adjustments from management's initial estimates.classified are rated pass. In addition, the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination processes,process, periodically review our allowance for loan losses.  The Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation may require the recognition of adjustments to theCompany’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Company to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgment ofjudgments about information available to them at the time of their examinations. Toexamination, which may not be currently available to management. Based on management’s comprehensive analysis of the extent that actual outcomes differ from management's estimates, additional provisions toloan portfolio, management believes the current level of the allowance for loan losses may be required that would adversely impact earnings in future periods.is adequate.
 
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Securities.   Securities are evaluated on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when market conditions warrant such an evaluation, to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. To determine whether a loss in value is other-than-temporary, management utilizes criteria such as the reasons underlying the decline, the magnitude and duration of the decline and whether or not management intends to sell or expects that it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to an anticipated recovery of the fair value. The term “other-than-temporary” is not intended to indicate that the decline is permanent, but indicates th atthat the prospects for a near-term recovery of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support a realizable value equal to or greater than the carrying value of the investment. Once a decline in value for a debt security is determined to be other-than-temporary, the other-than-temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, except for equity securities, where the full amount of the other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings.
 
31

Income Taxes.  Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability (or balance sheet) method.  Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various assets and liabilities and net operating loss carryforwrads and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.  The realization of our deferred tax assets principally depends upon our achieving projected future taxable income.  We may change our judgments regarding future profitability due to future market conditions and other factors.  We may adjust our def erreddeferred tax asset balances if our judgments change.
 
 
20

Comparison of Financial Condition at September  30, 2010March 31, 2011 and December 31, 20092010
 
Total AssetsGeneral. The Company’s total assets at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 were $102.2$103.6 million, an increase of $8.3$1.5 million, or 8.8%1.5%, from $93.9$102.1 million at December 31, 2009.2010. This increase was primarily due to growth in investment in interest-earning time depositscash and cash equivalents of $3.6$1.9 million, investment securities available for sale of $2.3 million,$611,000, and other real estate owned of $210,000.  Offsetting these increases was a decrease in interest-earning time deposits of $544,000, principal payments from mortgage-backed securities held to maturity of $424,000, and a decrease in loans receivable, net of the allowance for loan losses, of $2.0 million, cash and cash equivalents of $1.6 million, and other real estate owned of $285,000.  Offsetting these increases were principal payments from mortgage-backed securities held to maturity of $1.5 million.$336,000.   Asset growth for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 was funded by a $10.9$1.8 million increase in depos its.deposits.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents increased $1.6$1.9 million, or 30.3%22.1%, from $5.4$8.7 million at December 31, 20092010 to $7.1$10.6 million at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 as excess liquidity wasdeposits and principal payments on mortgage-backed securities held to maturity were invested in liquid money market accounts.accounts due to reduced loan demand.
 
Investment in Interest-Earning Time Deposits.  Investment in interest-earninginterest earning time deposits increased $3.6 million,decreased $544,000, or 114.5%9.1%, from $3.2$6.0 million at December 31, 20092010 to $6.8$5.5 million at September 30, 2010 as the Company used this investment vehicleMarch 31, 2011 due to complement its investment securities portfolio.maturities.
 
Investment Securities.  Investment securities available for sale increased $2.3 million,$611,000, or 230.0%18.7%, from $1.0$3.3 million at December 31, 20092010 to $3.3$3.9 million at September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011 as the Company invested excess liquidity into these investment vehicles.  During this same period, mortgage-backed securities held to maturity decreased $1.5 million,$424,000, or 20.0%7.8%, from $7.7$5.4 million to $6.2$5.0 million at March 31, 2011, due to principal payments on these securities.
 
Loans Receivable, Net. Loans receivable, net, increased $2.0 million,decreased $336,000, or 2.8%0.4%, to $74.8$74.4 million at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 from $72.7$74.7 million at December 31, 2009.  Increases2010.  Decreases within the portfolio occurred in constructionthe commercial real estate loan category which decreased $538,000, or 2.9%, one-to-four family residential owner occupied category which decreased $387,000, or 2.9%, home equity loans which increased $1.3 million, or 37.8%, residential mortgage one-to-four family non-owner occupied loans which grew $1.3 million,decreased $320,000, or 5.2%, commercial lines of credit which increased $514,000,decreased $236,000, or 42.9%12.7%, multi-family residentialand construction loans which increased $152,000,decreased $116,000, or 4.9%, and  home equity loans which grew $15,000, or 0.2%, as the Company continues its strategy of diversifying its2.0%.  Decreases in these loan portfolio with higher yielding and shorter-term loan products.  These increases were partially offset by a decr ease of $1.2 million, or 7.5%, of residential mortgage one-to-four family owner occupied loans.  The decrease in this loan category iscategories are attributable to normal amortization and pay-offs.pay-offs and reduced loan demand.  These decreases were offset by a $962,000, or 3.7%, increase in one-to-four family residential non-owner occupied loans and a $257,000, or 8.0%, increase in multi-family residential loans.
 
Deposits. Total interest-bearing deposits increased $10.9$1.8 million, or 16.0%2.3%, to $79.1$81.5 million at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 from $68.3$79.7 million at December 31, 2009.2010. This increasegrowth in deposits was attributable to increases of $10.8$1.2 million in certificates of deposit, and $257,000$453,000 in eSavings accounts, $134,000 in statement savings accounts, offset by decreases of $108,000 in eSavings accounts and $86,000$13,000 in passbook savings accounts. The increase in certificates of deposit was primarily due to the competitive interest rates offered by the Bank and investors seekingcontinuing to seek the safety of insured bank deposits.
 
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances. Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased $1.3 million from $6.9 million at December 31, 2009 to $5.6 million at September 30, 2010 as the Company used excess liquidity to pay-down Federal Home Loan Bank advances.
32

 
Other Borrowings.  In June 2009, the Company borrowed $450,000 from a commercial bank to finance the acquisition of a building in Allentown, Pennsylvania which serves as the offices for the Bank’s subsidiaries which began operation in July 2009 and branch banking office that opened in February 2010.  The loan has an interest rate of 5.75%, matures on July 1, 2014 and is amortizing over 180 months. The balance on the loan at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 was $428,000.$417,000.
 
Stockholders’ Equity.  Total stockholders’ equity decreased $1.2 millionincreased $173,000 to $16.2$15.4 million at September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 from $17.4$15.2 million at December 31, 2009.2010. Contributing to the decreaseincrease for the quarter was the purchase of 187,376 shares of the Company’s stock in the open-market as part of the Company’s stock repurchase programs, as well as other private repurchases, for an aggregate purchase price of $1.7 million, and dividends paid of $103,000.  These decreases were offset by $465,000$157,000 of net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, $88,000quarter, $30,000 amortization of stock awards and options under our stock compensation plans, $50,000and $17,000 related to common stock earned by participants in the employee stock ownership plan,plan. These increases were offset by dividends paid of $30,000 and $19,000$1,000 of accumulated other comprehensive income.loss.
 
21

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended September 30,March 31, 2011 and 2010 and 2009
 
General.  Net income amounted to $173,000$157,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, an increase of $34,000,$4,000, or 24.5%2.6%, compared to net income of $139,000$153,000 for the same period in 2009.three months ended March 31, 2010.  The increase in net income on a comparative quarterly basis was primarily the result of a $180,000 increasethe increases in net interest income a $25,000 increase inof $72,000 and non-interest income of $8,000, and a $15,000 decrease in the provision for loan losses of $2,000, which were offset by a $163,000 increaseincreases in non-interest expense of $69,000 and a $23,000 increase in the provision for income taxes.  Our average interest rate spread increased 71basis points to 3.53% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from 2.82% for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The improvement in our average interest rate spread occurred as a decrease in the average yield on our interest-earning assets was more than offset by a decrease in the average rate paid on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our net interest margin also increased quarter-over-quarter to 3.84% for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from 3.29% for the three months ended September 30, 2009.taxes of $9,000.
 
Net Interest Income.  Net interest income increased $180,000,$72,000, or 24.1%,8.8% to $927,000$891,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 from $747,000$819,000 for the comparable period in 2009.2010.  The increase was driven by a $119,000,$50,000, or 19.4%3.8% increase in interest income and a $22,000, or 4.5% decrease in interest expense, offset by a $61,000, or 4.5% increase in interest income.expense.
 
Interest Income.  Interest income increased $61,000,$50,000, or 4.5%3.8%, to $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2011 from $1.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase resultedwas primarily from $5.8attributable to a $1.5 million increase in average interest-earnings assets,net loans receivable which accounted for $51,000 of the increase whilecombined with a 5313 basis point increase in yield in this asset category to increase interest income $48,000. Also contributing to the yield on short-term investments and investment securitiesincrease was primarily responsible for the remaining $10,000 of the increase.  The growth in average interest-earnings assets between the two periods can be attributed primarily to increasesan $8.7 million increase in average short-term investments and investment securitiesactivities which had the effect of $4.0 million and average net loans receivab le of $3.9 million, offset byincreasing interest income $28,000.  Offsetting these increases was a decrease in averageinterest income related to mortgage-backed securities of $2.1 million.  The increasewhich declined $26,000 period over period due primarily to a $2.2 million decrease in the average balance between the two periods due to principal payments on these securities.  Increases in average short-term investments and investment securities and average net loans receivable was primarily funded by the $8.1$11.4 million period over period increase in average interest-bearing deposits.
 
Interest Expense.  Interest expense decreased $119,000,$22,000, or 19.4%4.5%, to $494,000$466,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 compared to $613,000$488,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009.March 31, 2010.  The decrease was primarily attributable to an 82a 40 basis point decrease in the overall cost of interest-bearing liabilities to 2.35%2.15% for the three months ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 from 3.17%2.55% for the three months ended September 30, 2009,March 31, 2010 which had the effectresulted in a decrease of decreasing$84,000 of interest expense by $174,000.  Thisexpense.  The decrease in rates was consistent with the decrease in market interest rates from September 2009March 2010 to September 2010.March 2011.  This decrease in interest expense due to rate was offset by a $6.8$10.2 million increase in average interest-bearing liabilities, which had the effect of increasing interest expense by $55,000.$62,000.  The increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities was primarily driven by the growth in average certificates of deposit, of $7.3 million, average statement savings accounts of $640,000, and average eSavings accounts of $299,000.  The increase in average certificates of deposit was due to customer interest in higher yielding secure investments.  These increases were offset by athe decrease in average FHLB advances of $1.3 million as these advances were paid down, as well as a decrease in average passbook accounts of $163,000.down.
 
 
2233

 
Average Balances, Net Interest Income, and Yields Earned and Rates Paid. The following table shows for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of interest from average interest-earning assets and the resulting yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates, and the net interest margin.  All average balances are based on daily balances.
 
  
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
  
2011
  
2010
 
  
Average
Balance
  
Interest
  
Average
Yield/
Rate
  
Average
Balance
  
Interest
  
Average
Yield/
Rate
 
Interest-earning assets: (Dollars in thousands) 
  Short-term investments and investment securities $18,763  $58   1.24  $10,053  $30   1.19%
  Mortgage-backed securities  5,210   63   4.84   7,455   89   4.78 
  Loans receivable, net (1)  74,152   1,236   6.67   72,624   1,188   6.54 
     Total interest-earning assets  98,125   1,357   5.53%  90,132   1,307   5.80%
Non-interest-earning assets   5,024            4,688         
     Total assets $103,149          $94,820         
Interest-bearing liabilities:                        
   Passbook accounts $3,091   3   0.39% $3,296   6   0.73%
   Statement savings accounts  6,911   13   0.75   6,549   19   1.16 
   eSavings accounts  2,432   6   0.99   1,942   7   1.44 
   Certificate of deposit accounts  68,377   384   2.55   57,596   383   2.66 
      Total deposits  80,811   406   2.01   69,383   415   2.39 
FHLB advances  5,600   54   3.86   6,850   67   3.91 
Other borrowings  419   6   5.73    439    6   5.47 
     Total interest-bearing liabilities  86,830   466   2.15%  76,672   488   2.55%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities  980           893         
     Total liabilities  87,810           77,565         
Stockholders’ Equity  15,339           17,255         
     Total liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $103,149          $94,820         
Net interest-earning assets $11,295          $13,460         
Net interest income; average interest rate 
    spread
     $891   3.38%     $819   3.25%
Net interest margin (2)          3.63%          3.63%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities          113.01%          117.56%
       Three Months Ended September 30,     
   2010   2009 
           Average            Average  
   Average        Yield/    Average        Yield/  
    Balance   Interest     Rate    Balance   Interest     Rate 
  Short-term investments and investment securities $15,260  $ 54   1.42% $11,205  $ 25   0.89%
  Mortgage-backed securities  6,444   77   4.78   8,586   103   4.80 
  Loans receivable, net (1)  74,977   1,290   6.88   71,061   1,232   6.93 
     Total interest-earning assets  96,681   1,421   5.88%  90,852   1,360   5.99%
Non-interest-earning assets   4,661           4,308         
     Total assets $101,342          $95,160         
Interest-bearing liabilities:                        
   Passbook accounts $3,184   4   0.50% $3,347    7   0.84%
   Statement savings accounts  6,766   15   0.89   6,126   13   0.85 
   eSavings accounts  1,831    5   1.09   1,532    6   1.57 
   Certificate of deposit accounts  65,771      403   2.45   58,472     512   3.50 
      Total deposits  77,552   427   2.20   69,477     538   3.10 
FHLB advances  6,057     61   4.03   7,314    70   3.83 
Other borrowings  429     6   5.59   449    5   4.45 
     Total interest-bearing liabilities  84,038       494   2.35%  77,240     613   3.17%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities      879           719         
     Total liabilities  84,917           77,959         
Stockholders’ Equity  16,425           17,201         
     Total liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $101,342          $95,160         
Net interest-earning assets $12,643          $13,612         
Net interest income; average interest rate
   spread
     $  927   3.53%     $  747   2.82%
Net interest margin (2)          3.84%          3.29%
Average interest-earning assets to
   average interest-bearing liabilities
          115.04%          117.62%
_____________________________________________
(1)Includes non-accrual loans during the respective periods.  Calculated net of deferred fees and discounts, loans in process and allowance for loan losses.
(2)Equals net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
Provision for Loan Losses.  The Company decreased its provision for loan losses by $15,000 from $44,000 for the three  months ended September 30, 2009 to $29,000 for the same period in 2010, based on an evaluation of the allowance relative to such factors as volume of the loan portfolio, concentrations of credit risk, prevailing economic conditions, prior loan loss experience and amount of non-performing loans at September 30, 2010.
Non-performing loans amounted to $2.5 million, or 3.35% of net loans receivable at September 30, 2010, consisting of nineteen loans, thirteen of which are on non-accrual status and six of which are 90 days or more past due and accruing interest.  This compares to eleven non-performing loans totaling $925,000, or 1.27% of net loans receivable at December 31, 2009.  The non-performing loans at September 30, 2010 include eleven one-to-four family non-owner occupied residential loans, four one-to-four family owner occupied residential loans, three home equity loans, and one commercial real estate loan, and all are generally well-collateralized or adequately reserved for.  Management does not anticipate any significant losses on these loans.  During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, three loans were placed on non-accrual status resulting in the reversal of $9,000 of previously accrued interest income.  Also during the quarter, six loans were placed back on accrual status resulting in the receipt of approximately $9,000 of previously reversed and past due interest, and one one-to-four family non-owner occupied residential loan with an outstanding balance of $260,000, previously on non-accrual status, was transferred into other real estate owned.  There was no charge-off associated with this transfer.  Not included in non-performing loans are performing troubled debt restructurings which totaled $431,000 at September 30, 2010 compared to $1.5 million at December 31, 2009.  The allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans receivable was 1.22% at September 30, 2010 and 1.14% at December 31, 2009.
23

Other real estate owned amounted to $1.2 million at September 30, 2010, consisting of four properties, none of which had a carrying value of more than $373,000.  This compares to three properties totaling $913,000 at December 31, 2009.  In October, a one-to-four family non-owner occupied residential loan with an outstanding loan balance of $403,000 at September 30, 2010 previously classified as non-accrual, was transferred into other real estate owned at a fair value of approximately $325,000.  In conjunction with this transfer, $78,000 of the outstanding loan balance was charged-off through the allowance for loan losses. Non-performing assets amounted to $3.7 million, or 3.62% of total assets at September 30, 2010, compared to $1.8 million, or 1.96% of total assets at December 31, 2009.
Non-Interest Income. Non-interest income increased $25,000, or 39.1%, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 over the comparable period in 2009 due primarily to the increase in fees generated by Quaint Oak Bank’s mortgage banking, title abstract and real estate sales subsidiaries which began operation in July of 2009.
Non-Interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $163,000, or 30.2%, from $539,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $702,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010.  Salaries and employee benefits expense accounted for $82,000 of the change as this expense increased 30.9%, from $265,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $347,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, due primarily to increased staff as the Company expanded its operations, including the new subsidiaries and branch banking office.&# 160; Other real estate owned expense accounted for $48,000 of the change as this expense increased 200.0%, from $24,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $72,000 for the same period in 2010, as costs were incurred on the Bank’s four foreclosed properties to maintain the properties and prepare them for resale.  Professional fees accounted for $26,000 of the increase as this expense increased 44.8%, from $58,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $84,000 for the same period in 2010, due in part to increased legal fees associated with non-performing loans and fees paid to a third party to conduct compliance reviews.   Advertising accounted for $12,000 of the change as this expense increased from $3,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $15,000 for the three months ended September  30, 2010, due primarily to increased marketing of the new subsidiaries and branch banking office.  The other expense category increase d $9,000, or 24.3%, from $37,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $46,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, while occupancy and equipment expense increased $8,000, or 19.5%, from $41,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $49,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010.  Changes in both of these expense categories were due primarily to expenses incurred with respect to the new subsidiaries and branch banking office.  Offsetting these increases in non-interest expenses was a decrease in directors’ fees and expenses of $12,000, or 19.0%, from $63,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $51,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, and a decrease of $10,000, or 20.8%, in FDIC deposit insurance assessment which decline from $48,000 for the three months ended September  30, 2009 to $38,000 for the same period in 2010.
Provision for Income Tax.  The provision for income tax increased $23,000 from $89,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 to $112,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 due primarily to the increase in pre-tax income.  The Company’s effective tax rate, including federal and state income taxes, was 39.3% and 39.0% for three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
24

Comparison of Operating Results for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
General.  Net income amounted to $465,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $127,000, or 37.6%, compared to net income of $338,000 for the same period in 2009. The increase in net income on a period over period basis was primarily the result of increases in net interest income of $392,000 and non-interest income of $128,000 and a decrease in the provision for loan losses of $43,000, offset by an increase in non-interest expense of $353,000 and the provision for income taxes of $83,000.  Our average interest rate spread increased 61basis points to 3.36% for the nine months ended September  30, 2010 from 2.75% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. As was the case for the thr ee month period ended September 30, 2010, the improvement in our average interest rate spread occurred as a decrease in the average yield on our interest-earning assets was more than offset by a decrease in the average rate paid on our interest-bearing liabilities. Our net interest margin also increased period-over-period to 3.70% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 3.30% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Net Interest Income.  Net interest income increased $392,000 or 17.9%, to $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $2.2 million for the comparable period in 2009.  The increase was driven by a $419,000, or 22.2% decrease in interest expense, offset by a $27,000, or 0.66% decrease in interest income.
Interest Income.  Interest income decreased $27,000, or 0.7%, to $4.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  The decrease in interest income resulted primarily from a 34 basis point decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets to 5.79% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 6.13% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, which had the effect of decreasing interest income by $131,000.  Contributing to the decrease in yield for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was the reversal of $67,000 of accrued interest income on loans placed on non-accrual status during the period.  This decrease in inter est income due to yield was offset by a $4.6 million increase in average interest-earning assets, which had the effect of increasing interest income by $104,000. The 47 basis point decrease in the overall yield on interest earning assets was consistent with the decrease in market interest rates from September 2009 to September 2010.  The growth in average interest-earnings assets between the two periods can be attributed primarily to increases in average short-term investments and investment securities of $4.4 million and average net loans receivable of $2.3 million, offset by a decrease in average mortgage-backed securities of $2.2 million.  The increase in average short-term investments and investment securities and average net loans receivable was primarily funded by the $7.5 million increase in average interest-bearing deposits.
Interest Expense.  Interest expense decreased $419,000, or 22.2%, to $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.  The decrease in interest expense was primarily attributable to a 95 basis point decrease in the overall cost of interest-bearing liabilities to 2.43% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from 3.38% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 which had the effect of decreasing interest expense by $563,000. The decrease in rates was consistent with the decrease in market interest rates from September 2009 to September 2010.  This decrease in interest expense due to rate was offset by a $6.1 million increase in average interest-bearing liabilities, which had the effect of increasing interest expense by $144,000. The increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities was primarily driven by the growth in average certificates of deposit of $5.7 million, average statement savings accounts of $1.2 million, average eSavings accounts of $713,000, and average other borrowings of $281,000.  The increase in average certificates of deposit was due to customer interest in higher yielding secure investments.  These increases were offset by the decrease in average FHLB advances of $1.7 million as these advances were paid down.
25

    Average Balances, Net Interest Income, and Yields Earned and Rates Paid. The following table shows for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of interest from average interest-earning assets and the resulting yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in dollars and rates, and the net interest margin.  All average balances are based on daily balances.
  
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
  
2010
  
2009
 
  
Average
Balance
  
Interest
  
Average
Yield/
Rate
  
Average
Balance
  
Interest
  
Average
Yield/
Rate
 
Interest-earning assets: (Dollars in thousands) 
  Short-term investments and
   investment securities
 $12,548  $127   1.35% $8,129  $116   1.90%
  Mortgage-backed securities  6,943   249   4.78   9,102   328   4.80 
  Loans receivable, net (1)  73,883   3,678   6.64   71,542   3,637   6.78 
     Total interest-earning assets  93,374   4,054   5.79%  88,773   4,081   6.13%
Non-interest-earning assets   4,612           3,633         
     Total assets $97,986          $92,406         
Interest-bearing liabilities:                        
   Passbook accounts $3,247   15   0.62% $3,334   23   0.92%
   Statement savings accounts  6,654   53   1.06   5,478   67   1.63 
   eSavings accounts  1,871   17   1.21   1,158   16   1.84 
   Certificate of deposit accounts  61,718   1,174   2.54   56,024   1,552   3.69 
      Total deposits  73,490   1,259   2.28   65,994   1,658   3.35 
FHLB advances  6,462   188   3.88   8,168   222   3.62 
Other borrowings  434    19   5.84   153    5   4.36 
     Total interest-bearing liabilities  80,386   1,466   2.43%  74,315   1,885   3.38%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities  863           775         
     Total liabilities  81,249           75,090         
Stockholders’ Equity  16,737           17,316         
     Total liabilities and Stockholders’
        Equity
 $97,986          $94,406         
Net interest-earning assets $12,988          $14,458         
Net interest income; average interest
   rate spread
     $2,588   3.36%     $2,196   2.75%
Net interest margin (2)          3.70%          3.30%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities          116.16%          119.46%
______________________
(1)Includes non-accrual loans during the respective periods.  Calculated net of deferred fees and discounts, loans in process and allowance for loan losses.
(2)Equals net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

Provision for Loan Losses.  The Company decreased its provision for loan losses by $43,000$2,000 from $129,000$29,000 for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2009March 31, 2010 to $86,000$27,000 for the same period in 2010,three months ended March 31, 2011, based on an evaluation of the allowance relative to such factors as volume of the loan portfolio, concentrations of credit risk, prevailing economic conditions, prior loan loss experience and amount of non-performing loans at September 30,March 31, 2011.
Non-performing loans amounted to $2.4 million, or 3.26% of net loans receivable at March 31, 2011, consisting of twenty-three loans, twelve of which are on non-accrual status and eleven of which are 90 days or more past due and accruing interest. Comparably, non-performing loans amounted to $1.5 million, or 2.02% of net loans receivable at December 31, 2010, consisting of thirteen loans, seven of which were on non-accrual status and six of which were 90 days or more past due and accruing interest.  The non-performing loans at March 31, 2011 include ten one-to-four family non-owner occupied residential loans, seven home equity loans, and six one-to-four family owner occupied residential loans, and all are generally well-collateralized or adequately reserved for. Management does not anticipate any significant losses on these loans. During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, seven loans were placed on non-accrual status resulting in the reversal of $18,000 of previously accrued interest income. Also during the quarter, two loans previously on non-accrual status were transferred to other real estate owned. Not included in non-performing loans are performing troubled debt restructurings which totaled $429,000 at March 31, 2011 compared to $430,000 at December 31, 2010. See additional discussion under “ComparisonThe allowance for loan losses as a percent of Operating Resultstotal loans receivable was 1.09% at March 31, 2011 and 1.15% at December 31, 2010.

34

Other real estate owned amounted to $1.4 million at March 31, 2011, consisting of seven properties, none of which had a carrying value greater than $375,000. This compares to five properties totaling $1.2 million at December 31, 2010.  Non-performing assets amounted to $3.8 million, or 3.69% of total assets at March 31, 2011 compared to $2.7 million, or 2.64% of total assets at December 31, 2010.  During the quarter ended March 31, 2011, two one-to-four family non-owner occupied residential loans with outstanding loan balances totaling $285,000 previously classified as non-accrual, were transferred into other real estate owned at a fair value of approximately $210,000.  In conjunction with this transfer, $75,000 of the outstanding loan balance was charged-off through the allowance for loan losses.  Subsequent to March 31, 2011, one one-to-four family residential owner-occupied with an outstanding loan balance of $468,000 classified as non-accrual on March 31, 2011, was transferred into other real estate owned at a fair value of approximately $375,000.  In conjunction with this transfer, $93,000 of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2010.”outstanding loan balance was charged-off through the allowance for loan losses.
 
Non-Interest Income.  Non-interest income increased $128,000,$8,000, or 118.5%11.3%, for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 over the comparable period in 2009.  As was the case for the three month period ending September 30, 2010 thedue primarily to an increase was primarily attributable to the feesin fee income generated by Quaint Oak Bank’s mortgage banking, title abstract and real estate sales subsidiaries which began operation in July of 2009.subsidiaries.
 
Non-Interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased $353,000,$69,000, or 21.8%11.3%, from $1.6 million$610,000 for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2009March 31, 2010 to $2.0 million$679,000 for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.  Salaries and employee benefits expense accounted for $268,000$64,000 of the change as this expense increased 36.4%19.9%, from $737,000$321,000 for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2009March 31, 2010 to $1.0 million$385,000 for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011 due primarily to increased staff as the Company expanded its mortgage banking operations including the new subsidiaries and opened a branch banking office.  Occupancy and equipment expense accounted for $52,000office in Allentown, Pennsylvania in February of the change as this expense increased 59.8%, from $87,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 20092010.  Also contributing to $139,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  This period over period increase was primarily attributablea $6,000 increase in directors’ fees and expenses, a $5,000 increase in expenses related to the costs associated with the building on Union Boulevard in Allentown, Pennsylvania, which was acquired late in the second quarter of 2009 to serve as the offices for Quaint Oak Bank’s mortgage banking, abstract title andother real estate sales subsidiaries and branch banking office.  Other expense accounted for $51,000, or 51.5% of the change as this expense category increased from $99,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $150,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, due primarily to expenses incurred with respect to the new subsidiaries and branch banking office.  Advertising accounted for $35,000 of the change as this expense increased 388.9%, from $9,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $44,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, due primarily to increased marketing of the new subsidiaries and branch banking office.  Also contributing to theowned, a $2,000 increase in non-interestoccupancy and equipment expense, period over perioda $2,000 increase in advertising and a $1,000 increase in FDIC deposit insurance assessments.  Offsetting these increases was a $4,000, or 1.5% increase$10,000 decrease in professional fees and a $1,000 or 1.0% increase on other real estate owned expense.  Offsetting these increases was a decrease in directors’ fees and expenses which declined $41,000, or 20.9%, from $196,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $155,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as a director and consultant became a full time employee of the Company on October 4, 2009 and as of this date no longer received director or consulting fees from the Company. Also offsetting the increases in non-interest expense was a $17,000, or 13.0% decrease in FDIC deposit insurance assessment.other expenses.
26

Provision for Income Tax.  The provision for income tax increased $83,000$9,000, or 9.2%,  from $220,000$98,000 for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2009March 31, 2010 to $303,000$107,000 for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 due primarily to the increase in pre-tax income.  The Company’sincome as our effective tax rate including federalremained relatively consistent at 40.5% for the 2011 period compared to 39.0% for the comparable period in 2010.
Earnings per Share.  Basic and state income taxes, was 39.5% and 39.4%diluted earnings per share increase to $0.16 per share for ninethe three months ended September 30,March 31, 2011 from $0.14 per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as a result of a $4,000 increase in net income and 2009, respectively.a reduction of 157,471 average basic shares outstanding and 155,869 average diluted shares outstanding during this same period.  The reduction in average shares outstanding was attributable to the purchase of 197,576 shares of the Company’s stock in the open-market as part of the Company’s stock repurchase programs, as well as other private repurchases from March 31, 2010 through March 31, 2011.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
The Company’s primary sources of funds are deposits, amortization and prepayment of loans and to a lesser extent, loan sales and other funds provided from operations.  While scheduled principal and interest payments on loans are a relatively predictable source of funds, deposit flows and loan prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.  The Company sets the interest rates on its deposits to maintain a desired level of total deposits.  In addition, the Company invests excess funds in short-term interest-earning assets that provide additional liquidity.  At September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, the Company's cash and cash equivalents amounted to $7.1$10.6 million.  At such date, the Company also had $3.8$2.5 million invested in interest-earning time deposits maturing in one year or less.
 
35

The Company uses its liquidity to fund existing and future loan commitments, to fund deposit outflows, to invest in other interest-earning assets and to meet operating expenses.  At September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, Quaint Oak Bank had outstanding commitments to originate loans of $371,000$732,000 and commitments under unused lines of credit of $3.4$3.9 million.
 
At September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in less than one year totaled $36.6$32.3 million.  Based on prior experience, management believes that a significant portion of such deposits will remain with us, although there can be no assurance that this will be the case.
 
In addition to cash flow from loan payments and prepayments and deposits, the Company has significant borrowing capacity available to fund liquidity needs.  If the Company requires funds beyond its ability to generate them internally, borrowing agreements exist with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, which provide an additional source of funds.  As of September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, we had $5.6 million of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh and had $40.5$45.4 million in borrowing capacity.  We are reviewing our continued utilization of advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank as a source of funding based on the decision in December 2008 by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh to suspend the dividend on, , and restrict the repurchase of, Federal Home Loan Bank stock.  The amount of Federal Home Loan Bank stock that a member institution is required to hold is directly proportional to the volume of advances taken by that institution.  Should we decide to utilize sources of funding other than advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, we believe that additional funding is available in the form of advances or repurchase agreements through various other sources.  The Bank currently has a line of credit commitment from another bank for borrowings up to $1.5 million.  There were no borrowings under this line of credit at September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.
27

 
Our stockholders’ equity amounted to $16.2$15.4 million at September 30, 2010, a decreaseMarch 31, 2011, an increase of $1.2 million$173,000 from December 31, 2009.2010. Contributing to the decreaseincrease for the quarter was the purchase of 187,376 shares of the Company’s stock in the open-market as part of the Company’s stock repurchase programs, as well as other private repurchases, for an aggregate purchase price of $1.7 million, and dividends paid of $103,000.  These decreases were offset by $465,000$157,000 of net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, $88,000quarter, $30,000 amortization of stock awards and options under our stock compensation plans, $50,000and $17,000 related to common stock earned by participants in the employee stock ownership plan,plan. These increases were offset by dividends paid of $30,000 and $19,000$1,000 of accumulated other comprehensive income.loss. For further discussion of the stock compensation plans, see Note 7 in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere herein.
 
Quaint Oak Bank is required to maintain regulatory capital sufficient to meet tier 1 leverage, tier 1 risk-based and total risk-based capital ratios of at least 4.00%, 4.00% and 8.00%, respectively.  At September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, Quaint Oak Bank exceeded each of its capital requirements with ratios of 13.76%13.70%, 21.32%21.85% and 22.61%23.12%, respectively. As a savings and loan holding company, the Company is not subject to any regulatory capital requirements.
 
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles are not recorded in our financial statements.  These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, and liquidity risk.  Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers' requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit.  Our exposure to credit loss from non-performance by the other party to the above-mentioned financial instruments is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.  We use the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for o n-balanceon-balance sheet instruments.  In general, we do not require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with off–balance sheet credit risk.
 
36

Commitments.  At September 30, 2010,March 31, 2011, we had unfunded commitments under lines of credit of $3.4$3.9 million and $371,000$732,000 of commitments to originate loans.  We had no commitments to advance additional amounts pursuant to outstanding lines of credit or undisbursed construction loans.
 
 
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
 
The consolidated financial statements and related financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America which generally require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in relative purchasing power over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of Company’s assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on the Company’s performance than does the effect of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the prices of good sgoods and services, since such prices are affected by inflation to a larger extent than interest rates.
 
 
28

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
Not Applicable.
 
 
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.  Based on their evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations are operating in a nan effective manner.  
 
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during the secondfirst fiscal quarter of fiscal 20102011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2937

 
PART II
 
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
 
The Company is not involved in any pending legal proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of business, which involve amounts in the aggregate believed by management to be immaterial to the financial condition and operating results of the Company.
 
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
 
Not applicable.
 
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
 
(a)           Not applicable.
 
(b)           Not applicable.
 
(c)           Purchases of Equity Securities
 
The Company’s repurchases of its common stock made during the quarter ended September 30, 2010March 31, 2011 are set forth in the table below:

Period
 
Total Number of Shares
Purchased (1)
  
Average Price
Paid per Share
  
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
  
Maximum
Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs (2)
 
July 1, 2010 – July 31, 2010  2,500  $9.01   2,500   53,104 
August 1, 2010 – August 31, 2010  21,000   8.76   1,000   52,104 
September  1, 2010 – September 30, 2010  33,100   9.06   33,100   19,004 
Total
  56,600  $8.94   36,600   19,004 
Period
Total Number of Shares
Purchased
Average Price Paid per Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Maximum
 Number of Shares
that May Yet Be Purchased Under
the Plans or
Programs (1)
January 1, 2011 – January 31, 2011-$--68,535
February 1, 2011 – February 28, 2011----
March 1, 2011 – March 31, 2011- ---
Total
-$--68.535

Notes to this table:

(1)  Certain shares were acquired during the quarter as a result of privately negotiated transactions.
(2)  On March 11, 2010, the Company announced by press release its second repurchase program to repurchase up to an additional 69,431 shares, or approximately 5.5% of the Company's current outstanding shares of common stock as of March 11, 2010. On September 10, 2010, the Company announced by press release its third repurchase program to repurchase up to an additional 69,431 shares, or approximately 6.2% of the Company's current outstanding shares of common stock as of September 30, 2010. The Company will commencecommenced this third stock repurchase program upon the completion of its prior repurchase program which has 19,004 shares remaining to be purchased as of September 30,on December 3, 2010.


ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
 
Not applicable.
 
 
30

ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
 
 


38


ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
 
Not applicable.
 
 
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following Exhibits are filed as part of this report:

 
No.
Description
31.1
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.0Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350
31.1     Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.1     Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.0     Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
3139

 

 
 
 
 
SIGNATURES
 
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 



 
Date: 
Date:November 15, 2010May 16, 2011By:/s/Robert T. Strong
   Robert T. Strong
   President and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
Date:May 16, 2011By:/s/John J. Augustine
Date:November 15, 2010 John J. Augustine
   Chief Financial Officer