UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

The Meet Group, Inc.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

(UNAUDITED) 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Note 1— Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 

Basis of Presentation 

The Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”). The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all subsidiaries and affiliates in which the Company holds a controlling financial interest as of the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of The Meet Group and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company and reflect all normal, recurring adjustments that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial information. The results of operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent quarter or for the year ending December 31, 2019. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes included herein should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on March 8, 2019.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and assumptions are required in revenue recognition, accounting for business combinations, accounts receivable valuation, the fair value of financial instruments, the valuation of long-lived assets, valuation of deferred tax assets, income taxes, contingencies, goodwill and intangible assets, video broadcaster fees and stock-based compensation. Some of these judgments can be subjective and complex and, consequently, actual results may differ from these estimates. The Company’s estimates often are based on complex judgments, probabilities and assumptions that it believes to be reasonable but that are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. For any given individual estimate or assumption made by the Company, there may also be other estimates or assumptions that are reasonable.

The Company regularly evaluates its estimates and assumptions using historical experience and other factors, including the economic environment. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, the Company’s estimates and assumptions may prove to be incomplete or inaccurate, or unanticipated events and circumstances may occur that might cause it to change those estimates and assumptions. Market conditions, such as illiquid credit markets, volatile equity markets, dramatic fluctuations in foreign currency rates and economic downturn, can increase the uncertainty already inherent in its estimates and assumptions. The Company adjusts its estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances indicate the need for change. Those changes generally will be reflected in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements on a prospective basis unless they are required to be treated retrospectively under the relevant accounting standard. It is possible that other professionals, applying reasonable judgment to the same facts and circumstances, could develop and support a range of alternative estimated amounts. The Company is also subject to other risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from estimated amounts, such as changes in competition, litigation, legislation and regulations.

Fair Value Measurements

The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments reflect the amounts that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price).

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and deferred revenue approximate fair value due to their short maturities. The Company has evaluated the estimated fair value of financial instruments using available market information and management’s estimates. The use of different market assumptions and/or estimation methodologies could have a significant effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

In addition, the Company carries its contingent consideration liabilities related to acquisitions at fair value. In accordance with the three-tier fair value hierarchy, the Company determined the fair value of its contingent consideration liabilities using the income approach with assumed discount rates and payment probabilities. The income approach uses Level 3, or unobservable inputs as defined under the accounting guidance for fair value measurements. At March 31,June 30, 2019, the Company’s contingent consideration liability had a fair value of $1.7$1.8 million. See Note 2— Acquisitions for more information regarding the Company’s contingent consideration liability.

The Company carries a term loan facility with an outstanding balance at March 31,June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 of $29.6$25.9 million and $36.9 million, respectively. As part of the Growlr Acquisition (as defined in Note 2— Acquisitions), the Company drew down $7.0 million on its revolving credit facility. The outstanding balance on the Company’s revolving credit facility at March 31,June 30, 2019 was $7.0 million. The outstanding balances of the Company’s term loan and revolving credit facilities as of March 31,June 30, 2019 and

The Company leases its operating facilities in the U.S. and Germany under certain noncancelable operating leases that expire through 2022.2023. The Company also leases certain fixed assets under capital leases that expire through 2021. The capital leases are for the Company's data centers, printers and other furniture in the Company's German offices. The outstanding balance of operating and finance leases as of March 31,June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 approximates fair value due to their relatively short maturities.

The Company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value.  The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether the Company has elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. The Company may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain of its risk, even though hedge accounting does not apply or the Company elects not to apply hedge accounting.

The Company is measuring the credit risk of its derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio. See Note 10— Derivatives and Hedging Activities for further details.

Foreign Currency

The functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries is the local currency. The financial statements of these subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars using period-end rates of exchange for assets and liabilities and average quarterly rates of exchange for revenues and expenses. Translation gains (losses) are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a component of stockholders’ equity. Net gains and losses resulting from foreign exchange transactions are included in other income (expense).

Net Income (Loss) per Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares and common stock equivalents outstanding, calculated under the treasury stock method for options, unvested restricted stock awards (“RSAs”), unvested in-the-money performance share units (“PSUs”) and warrants using the average market prices during the period.

The following table shows the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the following:

The following table summarizes the number of dilutive securities, which may dilute future earnings per share, outstanding for each of the periods presented, but not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share:

Significant Customers and Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and accounts receivable. The Company invests its excess cash in high-quality, liquid money market funds maintained by major U.S. banks and financial institutions. The Company has not experienced any losses on its cash and cash equivalents, including restricted cash or money market funds.

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral. The Company has no recent history of significant losses from uncollectible accounts. During the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 and 2018, two customers, both of which were advertising aggregators (which represent thousands of advertisers) and customer payment processors, comprised approximately 61% and 47%49% of total revenues, respectively. Two and three customers, which were advertising aggregators and customer payment processors, comprised approximately 42%44% and 36% of accounts receivable as of March 31,June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

The Company does not expect its current or future credit risk exposure to have a significant impact on its operations, however, there can be no assurance that the Company’s business will not experience any adverse impact from credit risk in the future.

Recent Issued Accounting Standards

The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-02 as of January 1, 2019, using the transition method per ASU No. 2018-11 issued in July 2018 wherein entities were allowed to initially apply the new leases standard at adoption date and recognize a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. Accordingly, all periods prior to January 1, 2019 were presented in accordance with the previous ASC Topic 840, Leases, and no retrospective adjustments were made to the comparative periods presented. Finance leases were not impacted by the adoption of ASC 842, as finance lease liabilities and the corresponding ROU assets were already recorded in the balance sheet under the previous guidance, ASC 840.

The Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the new standard which, among other things, allowed the Company to not reassess the lease classification, the lease identification and the initial direct costs for any existing leases. Further, as permitted by the standard, the Company made an accounting policy election not to record ROU assets or lease liabilities for leases with a term of 12 months or less. Instead, consistent with legacy accounting guidance, the Company will recognize payments for such leases in the consolidated statement of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Upon adoption on January 1, 2019, this standard resulted in the recognition of additional assets of $3.2 million and liabilities of $3.3 million on its accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The new standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows.

Note 2— Acquisitions

On March 5, 2019, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding units of Initech, LLC, a privately held company that owns and operates Growlr (“Growlr”), a leading same-sex social app, for cash consideration of $11.8 million, plus an earnout of up to $2.0 million (the “Growlr Acquisition”). The Growlr Acquisition was funded by $4.8 million of cash on hand and a draw down of $7.0 million from the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility. See Note 6— Long-Term Debt for further details on the Revolving Credit Facility. The earnout of $2.0 million is to be paid in annual $1.0 million installments over the next two years if certain revenue metrics are achieved in each year. The Company expects goodwill to be deductible for tax purposes.

The acquisition-date fair value of the consideration transferred is as follows:

The following is the preliminary purchase price allocation as of the March 5, 2019 acquisition date:

The preliminary fair values of the Growlr trademarks were determined using an income approach. The preliminary fair value of software acquired, which represents the primary platform on which the Growlr apps operate, was determined using a cost approach. The preliminary fair value of customer relationships was determined using an excess earnings approach. The amounts assigned to the identifiable intangible assets are as follows:

The operating results of Growlr for the period from March 5, 2019 to March 31,June 30, 2019 including revenues of $0.2 million and net loss of approximately $0.03 million, have beenare included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2019. Results include revenues of $0.9 million and $1.1 million and net income of approximately $0.2 million for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively. The Company incurred a total of $0.3 million in transaction costs in connection with the Growlr Acquisition, which were included in acquisition and restructuring costs within the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019.

The following pro forma information shows the results of the Company’s operations for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 and 2018 as if the Growlr Acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2018. The pro forma information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of what would have occurred if the Growlr Acquisition had been made as of that date.

ASC 820 identifies fair value as the exchange price, or exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy that distinguishes among the following:

To the extent that the valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Company in determining fair value

Derivative Financial Instruments

Currently, the Company uses an interest rate swap, interest rate cap and a cross currency swap to manage its interest rate risk.  The valuation of these instruments is determined using widely accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied volatilities. The fair values of the interest rate swap and the cross currency swap are determined using the market standard methodology of netting the discounted future fixed cash receipts (or payments) and the discounted expected variable cash payments (or receipts). The variable cash payments (or receipts) are based on an expectation of future interest rates (forward curves) derived from observable market interest rate curves.

The fair value of the interest rate cap is determined using the market standard methodology of discounting the future expected cash receipts that would occur if variable interest rates rise above the strike rate of the cap. The variable interest rates used in the calculation of projected receipts on the cap are based on an expectation of future interest rates derived from observable market interest rate curves and volatilities.

To comply with the provisions of ASC 820, the Company incorporates credit valuation adjustments to appropriately reflect both its nonperformance risk and the respective counterparty’s nonperformance risk in the fair value measurements. In adjusting the fair value of the Company’s derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, the Company has considered the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements, such as collateral postings, thresholds, mutual puts and guarantees. The Company made an accounting policy election to measure the credit risk of its derivative financial instruments that are subject to master netting agreements on a net basis by counterparty portfolio.

Although the Company has determined that the majority of the inputs used to value its derivatives fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the credit valuation adjustments associated with its derivatives utilize Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties. The Company has determined that the impact of the credit valuation adjustments made to its derivative contracts, which determination was based on the fair value of each individual contract, was not significant to the overall valuation. As a result, all of the Company’s derivatives held as of March 31,June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were classified as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. See Note 10— Derivatives and Hedging Activities for further discussion on derivative financial instruments.

Items measured at fair value on a recurring basis include money market mutual funds, derivatives and hedging instruments and contingent consideration. During the periods presented, the Company has not changed the manner in which it values assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs. The following fair value hierarchy table presents information about each major category of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s contingent consideration liability, which represents a recurring measurement that is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, wherein fair value is estimated using significant unobservable inputs:

The Company determined the fair value of its contingent consideration liabilities using the income approach with assumed discount rates and payment probabilities. The income approach uses Level 3, or unobservable inputs, as defined under the accounting guidance, for fair value measurements. Based on the Company’s projected results, the Company estimated the probability of success to be 100% for the contingent consideration related to the Growlr Acquisition as of March 31,June 30, 2019. The contingent consideration is recorded in accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018.June 30, 2019.

The Company recognizes transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy as of the end of the reporting period. There were no transfers within the levels of the fair value hierarchy during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 and as of the year ended December 31, 2018.

Note 4— Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Intangible assets consist of the following:

Amortization expense was approximately $2.6$2.8 million and $3.1$3.0 million for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $5.3 million and $6.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Annual future amortization expense for the Company’s intangible assets is as follows:

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 are as follows:

Note 5— Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consist of the following:

Property and equipment depreciation expense was approximately $0.7 million and $0.6 million for each of the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $1.3 million and $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Note 6— Long-Term Debt

Credit Facilities

On September 18, 2017, in connection with the Company’s acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of Lovoo (the “Lovoo Acquisition”), the Company entered into an amended and restated credit agreement (the “Amended and Restated Credit Agreement”) with the several banks and other financial institutions party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent (the “Agent”), amending and restating the Credit Agreement, dated March 3, 2017. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement provides for a $20.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and a $60.0 million delayed draw term loan facility (the “Term Loan Facility,” and together with the “Revolving Credit Facility”, the “Credit Facilities”). On October 18, 2017, the Company drew down $60.0 million from its Term Loan Facility in connection with the Lovoo Acquisition. Fees and direct costs incurred when the Company entered into the Credit Facilities were $0.6 million. Fees and direct costs incurred are offset against long-term debt on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

On March 7, 2018, the Company entered into an amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, that among other things, amends the definition of “Applicable Rate” and “EBITDA” and makes certain changes to the financial covenants. On July 27, 2018, the Company entered into an amendment to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement that amends the Company’s obligation to use certain of its excess cash flow to prepay its obligations under the Credit Agreement by limiting the applicable period for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 to the period commencing October 31, 2017 and ended December 31, 2017. The Company made an excess cash flow payment of approximately $4.3 million in the third quarter of 2018.

In March 2019, the Company made an excess cash flow payment of $3.6 million related to the fiscal year end December 31, 2018. On March 5, 2019, in connection with the Growlr Acquisition, as discussed in Note 2— Acquisitions, the Company drew down $7.0 million from its Revolving Credit Facility. Borrowings on the Revolving Credit Facility are included in long-term debt, less current portion, net, on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The Company intends to use the remaining proceeds of the Revolving Credit Facility to finance working capital needs and for general corporate purposes. Amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility may be borrowed, repaid and re-borrowed from time to time until the maturity date of the Credit Agreement on September 18, 2020. The Term Loan Facility is subject to quarterly payments of principal in an amount equal to $3,750,000 commencing December 31, 2017 and continuing through maturity. At the Company’s election, loans made under the Credit Facilities will bear interest at either (i) a base rate (“Base Rate”) plus an applicable margin or (ii) a London interbank offered rate (“LIBO Rate”) plus an applicable margin, subject to adjustment if an event of default under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement has occurred and is continuing. The Base Rate means the highest of (a) the Agent’s “prime rate,” (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.50% and (c) the LIBO Rate for an interest period of one month plus 1%. The Company’s present and future domestic subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”) will guarantee the obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries under the Credit Facilities. The obligations of the Company and its subsidiaries under the Credit Facilities are secured by all of the assets of the Company and the Guarantors, subject to certain exceptions and exclusions as set forth in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and other loan documents.

The Credit Facilities consist of the following:

The weighted average interest rate on the Credit Facilities at March 31,June 30, 2019 was 6.31%5.83%.

The Company stores a portion of its user and business data using Amazon Web Services in the U.S. with a minimum commitment agreement that expires in 2021. Lovoo stores a majority of its user and business data in the Google Cloud Platform in Germany under a noncancelable minimum commitment agreement that expires in 2023.

A summary of minimum future commitments required under the Company’s cloud data storage contracts as of March 31,June 30, 2019 are as follows:

Credit Facility

A summary of minimum future principal payments under our Credit Facilities as of March 31,June 30, 2019 are as follows: 

Litigation

From time to time, we are party to certain legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course and are incidental to our business. We operate our business online, which is subject to extensive regulation by federal and state governments. Future events or circumstances, currently unknown to management, will determine whether the resolution of pending or threatened litigation or claims will ultimately have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations in any future reporting periods.

Retirement Plan

The Company maintains The Meet Group, Inc. 401(k) Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), which is a savings and investment plan intended to be qualified under the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan covers the majority of the employees of the Company. In January 2014, the Company began providing matching contributions to the Plan, based on a participant’s contribution. The Company’s 401(k) match expense totaled $0.2$0.4 million for each of the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The expense is included in sales and marketing, product development and content, and general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

Preferred Stock

The total number of shares of preferred stock, $.001 par value, that the Company is authorized to issue is 5,000,000.

The Board of Directors may, without further action by the stockholders, issue a series of preferred stock and fix the rights and preferences of those shares, including the dividend rights, dividend rates, conversion rights, exchange rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, redemption price or prices, liquidation preferences, the number of shares constituting any series and the designation of such series.

As of March 31,June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 there were no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Common Stock

The total number of shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, that the Company is authorized to issue is 100,000,000.

The Company issued shares of common stock of 151,737157,334 and 1,079,496 related to exercises of stock options and 420,7721,372,723 and 1,591,662 related to restricted stock awards in the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 and the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively.

Stock-Based Compensation

The fair value of stock options is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, based on weighted average assumptions. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect over the expected term at the time of grant. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. The Company uses the simplified method to determine the expected option term since the Company’s stock option exercise experience does not provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate the expected option term.

The Company began granting RSAs to its employees in April 2013. The fair value of RSAs is determined using the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Stock-based compensation expense for RSAs is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. RSAs generally vest over a three-year period with 33% vesting at the end of one year and the remaining vesting annually thereafter.

The Company began granting PSUs to certain employees in April and July 2018. PSUs are based on a relative Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) metric over a performance period spanning three years from the grant date of the PSU. PSU awards will vest at the end of the performance period and will be paid immediately in shares of common stock. Stock-based compensation expense for PSUs is estimated on the date of grant and amortized on a straight-line basis over the performance period. PSU awards are forfeited if the participant is no longer employed on the third anniversary of the grant date, except in the event of an involuntary termination, death, disability or change in control. The Company estimated the fair value of the PSU awards using a Monte-Carlo simulation model utilizing several key assumptions including expected Company and Russell 2000 Peer Group share price volatility, correlation coefficients between peers, the risk-free rate of return, the expected dividend yield and other award design features.

The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of stock-based awards represent the Company’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. As a result, if factors change and the Company uses different assumptions, the Company’s stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.

As of March 31,June 30, 2019, there was approximately $1.4$1.0 million, $10.6$16.9 million and $1.3$3.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average vesting period of approximately of 1.0 year, 1.70.8 years, 2.2 years and 2.12.5 years relating to stock options, RSAs and PSUs, respectively.

Stock Compensation Plans

On June 1, 2018, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2018 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”), providing for the issuance of up to 8.8 million shares of the Company’s common stock, including approximately 0.3 million shares previously approved by the Company’s stockholders under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2012 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”), minus one share of common stock for every one share of common stock that was subject to an option granted after April 9, 2018 but before June 1, 2018 under the 2012 Plan, plus an additional number of shares of common stock equal to the number of options previously granted under the 2012 Plan and the Amended and Restated 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2006 Stock Plan”) that either terminate, expire, or are forfeited after April 9, 2018 and any restricted stock awards that either terminate, expire, or are forfeited equal to the number of awards granted under the 2012 Plan and 2006 Stock Plan multiplied by the fungible ratio of 1.4. As of March 31,June 30, 2019, there were approximately 6.73.4 million shares of common stock available for grant.

A summary of RSA activity under the 2018 Plan during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 is as follows:

Shares are forfeited if not vested within three years from the date of grant and vest in three equal annual increments. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to RSAs under the 2018 Plan of approximately $1.0$1.6 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019.June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $2.5 million and $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

PSU share payouts range from a threshold of 33% to a maximum of 170% based on the relative ranking of the Company’s TSR as compared to the TSR of the companies in the Russell 2000 Peer Group. The PSU award stipulates certain limitations to the payout in the event the payout reaches a defined ceiling level or the Company’s TSR is negative. The Company estimated the fair value of the PSU awards at the date of grant using a Monte-Carlo simulation model utilizing several key assumptions including expected Company and Russell 2000 Peer Group share price volatility, correlation coefficients between peers, the risk-free rate of return, the expected dividend yield and other award design features.

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to PSUs under the 2018 Plan of approximately $0.02$0.2 million for each of the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2019.

On December 16, 2016, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2012 Plan, providing for the issuance of up to 10.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock, including approximately 2.1 million shares previously approved by the Company’s stockholders under the Company’s 2006 Stock Plan, less one share of common stock for every one share of common stock that was subject to an option or other award granted after December 31, 2011 under the 2006 Stock Plan, plus an additional number of shares of common stock equal to the number of shares previously granted under the 2006 Stock Plan that either terminate, expire, or are forfeited after December 31, 2011. As of June 1, 2018, grants are no longer issued from the 2012 Plan.

A summary of stock option activity under the 2012 Plan during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 is as follows:

The total intrinsic values of options exercised under the 2012 Plan werewas $0.2 million during each of the threesix months ended March 31, 2019. No options under the 2012 Plan were exercised during the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 and 2018. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to options under the 2012 Plan of approximately $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $0.6 million and $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

A summary of RSA activity under the 2012 Plan during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 is as follows:

Shares are forfeited if not vested within three years from the date of grant and vest in three equal annual increments. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to RSAs under the 2012 Plan of approximately $0.7$0.4 million and $1.2$1.1 million for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $1.1 million and $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

PSU share payouts range from a threshold of 33% to a maximum of 170% based on the relative ranking of the Company’s TSR as compared to the TSR of the companies in the Russell 2000 Peer Group. The PSU award stipulates certain limitations to the payout in the event the payout reaches a defined ceiling level or the Company’s TSR is negative. The Company estimated the fair value of the PSU awards at the date of grant using a Monte-Carlo simulation model utilizing several key assumptions including expected Company and Russell 2000 Peer Group share price volatility, correlation coefficients between peers, the risk-free rate of return, the expected dividend yield and other award design features.

A summary of PSU awards under the 2012 Plan during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 is as follows:

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to PSUs under the 2012 Plan of approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2019, respectively.respectively, and $0.1 million in each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.

On June 27, 2007, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2006 Stock Plan, providing for the issuance of up to 3.7 million shares of common stock plus an additional number of shares of common stock equal to the number of shares previously granted under the 1998 Stock Option Plan that either terminate, expire, or lapse after the date of the Board of Directors’ approval of the 2006 Stock Plan. All options granted and outstanding have been fully expensed prior to 2016.

A summary of stock option activity under the 2006 Stock Plan during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 is as follows:

The total intrinsic values of options exercised under the 2006 Stock Plan were $0.04$0.05 million during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019. No options under the 2006 Stock Plan were exercised during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2018.

On October 3, 2016, in connection with the closing of the acquisition of Skout, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2016 Inducement Omnibus Incentive Plan in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635(c)(4). At the closing of the acquisition of Skout, the Company granted stock options to purchase an aggregate of up to 355,000 shares of its common stock to 25 former Skout employees as an inducement material to becoming non-executive employees of the Company. On February 27, 2017, the Company amended and restated the 2016 Inducement Omnibus Incentive Plan (as so amended and restated, the “2016 Stock Plan”) and authorized an additional 2,000,000 shares of common stock under the 2016 Stock Plan. At the closing of the acquisition of if(we), the (“if(we) Acquisition,Acquisition”), the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of up to 75,000 shares of its common stock and restricted stock awards representing an aggregate of 717,500 shares of common stock to 83 former if(we) employees as an inducement material to becoming non-executive employees of the Company. At the closing of the Lovoo Acquisition, the Company granted restricted stock awards representing an aggregate of 531,500 shares of common stock to 96 former Lovoo employees as an inducement material to becoming non-executive employees of the Company.

A summary of stock option activity under the 2016 Stock Plan during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 is as follows:

The total intrinsic values of options exercised under the 2016 Stock Plan were $0.01 million during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019. No options under the 20062016 Stock Plan were exercised during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2018. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to options under the 2016 Stock Plan of approximately $0.1 million for each of the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 and $0.2 million for each of the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.2018.

A summary of RSA activity under the 2016 Stock Plan during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 is as follows:

Shares are forfeited if not vested within three years from the date of grant, and vest in three equal annual increments. The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense related to RSAs under the 2016 Stock Plan of approximately $0.2 million and $0.4$0.3 million for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $0.4 million and $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Note 9— Income Taxes

The Company recorded a net income tax expense of approximately $0.3$0.9 million and a benefit from income taxes of approximately $0.3$0.5 million for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The net income tax expense recorded during the