UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

______________________


FORM 10-Q


Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the Quarterly Period Ended February 28,May 31, 2007


Commission File Number 333-121321


GREEN PLAINS RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Iowa

 

84-1652107

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(IRS Employer Identification No.)



4124 Airport Road, Shenandoah, Iowa  51601


(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)



(712) 246-2932

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

         S   Yes   £   No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition orof “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):


Large accelerated filer

£

Accelerated filer     

S

Non-accelerated filer

£


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  £  Yes   S  No


Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class

 

Outstanding as of April 9,July 3, 2007

Common Stock, $.001$0.001 par value

 

6,002,8116,021,311 Shares

 

 

 






TABLE OF CONTENTS





PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

Item 1 -

Financial Statements

 

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

3

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

4

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity

5

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

56

 

 

 

 

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

78

 

 

 

Item 2 -

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

2519

 

 

 

Item 3 -

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

4132

 

 

 

Item 4 -

Controls and Procedures

4233

 

 

 

 

 

 

PART II. – OTHER INFORMATION

 

 

 

 

Item 1 -

Legal Proceedings

4334

 

 

 

Item 1A -

Risk Factors

4334

 

 

 

Item 2 -

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

4334

 

 

 

Item 3 -

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

4334

 

 

 

Item 4 -

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

4334

 

 

 

Item 5 -

Other Information

4334

 

 

 

Item 6 -

Exhibits

4435

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

4637


In this Quarterly Report, references to “we,” “us,” “our” or the “Company” refer to Green Plains Renewable Energy, Inc. and its subsidiary, Superior Ethanol, L.L.C.

The statements in this Quarterly Report that are not historical information, including statements concerning plans and objectives of management for future operations, economic performance or related assumptions, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may include words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “should,” “goal,” “forecast” and other words and terms of similar meaning. Although we believe that our expectations regarding future events are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our goals will be achieved. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are described under Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in this Quarterly Report and under Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” ; in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2006.





2



PART I. — FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



GREEN PLAINS RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

GREEN PLAINS RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

GREEN PLAINS RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February 28,

 

November 30,

 

May 31,

 

November 30,

 

2007

 

2006

 

2007

 

2006

ASSETS

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

Current Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

$

32,381,047

$

43,088,464

$

19,300,481

$

43,088,464

Interest receivable

 

129,945

 

183,611

 

87,827

 

183,611

Prepaid expenses and other

 

630,076

 

526,524

 

1,821,978

 

526,524

Derivative financial instruments

 

2,596,213

 

397,875

 

1,414,500

 

397,875

Deferred income taxes

 

317,500

 

-

Total current assets

 

35,737,281

 

44,196,474

 

22,942,286

 

44,196,474

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property and Equipment – net

 

67,657,488

 

47,081,787

 

98,434,195

 

47,081,787

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Assets

 

4,288,770

 

4,728,671

 

4,539,668

 

4,728,671

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

$

107,683,539

$

96,006,932

$

125,916,149

$

96,006,932

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

$

9,336,329

$

9,704,352

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$

16,232,034

$

9,704,352

Derivative financial instruments

 

311,737

 

-

 

773,750

 

-

Deferred income taxes

 

482,700

 

16,400

 

-

 

16,400

Current maturities of long term debt

 

2,460,000

 

60,000

 

1,260,000

 

60,000

Total current liabilities

 

12,590,766

 

9,780,752

 

18,265,784

 

9,780,752

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term Liabilities

 

 

 

 

Long-term deferred income taxes

 

40,500

 

-

Long –term debt less current maturities

 

8,377,196

 

330,000

 

21,823,237

 

330,000

Total long-term liabilities

 

8,417,696

 

330,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock; $.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized,

 

 

 

 

6,002,811 and 6,002,736 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

6,003

 

6,003

Common stock; $0.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized,

 

 

 

 

6,021,311 and 6,002,736 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

6,021

 

6,003

Additional paid-in capital

 

85,421,460

 

85,419,806

 

88,259,425

 

85,419,806

Retained earnings

 

1,247,614

 

470,371

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

 

(2,438,318)

 

470,371

Total stockholders' equity

 

86,675,077

 

85,896,180

 

85,827,128

 

85,896,180

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$

107,683,539

$

96,006,932

$

125,916,149

$

96,006,932


See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.



3




GREEN PLAINS RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

GREEN PLAINS RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

GREEN PLAINS RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

 

For the Three Months Ended

 February 28,

 

For the Period

 From Inception

On June 29, 2004

Through

February 28,

For the Three Months Ended

May 31,

For the Six Months Ended

May 31,

For the Period

 From Inception

On June 29, 2004

Through

May 31,

 

2007

 

2006

 

2007

 

2007

 

2006

 

2007

 

2006

 

2007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

$

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses

 

853,501

 

123,811

 

3,784,337

 

3,547,209

 

455,089

 

4,400,710

 

578,900

 

7,331,547

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss from operations

 

(853,501)

 

(123,811)

 

(3,784,337)

 

(3,547,209)

 

(455,089)

 

(4,400,710)

 

(578,900)

 

(7,331,547)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other income

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain on derivative financial instruments

 

1,688,526

 

-

 

3,288,922

Other income (expense)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gain (loss) on derivative

financial instruments

 

(1,284,472)

 

-

 

404,054

 

-

 

2,004,450

Interest income

 

456,918

 

135,639

 

2,581,009

 

350,442

 

565,126

 

807,360

 

700,765

 

2,931,451

Interest expense

 

(45,682)

 

-

 

(45,682)

 

-

 

(45,682)

Other income

 

-

 

-

 

2,721

 

289

 

-

 

289

 

-

 

3,010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income before income taxes

 

1,291,943

 

11,828

 

2,088,315

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

(4,526,632)

 

110,037

 

(3,234,689)

 

121,865

 

(2,438,318)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes

 

514,700

 

-

 

840,700

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

(840,700)

 

-

 

(326,000)

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$

777,243

$

11,828

$

1,247,615

Net income (loss)

$

(3,685,932)

$

110,037

$

(2,908,689)

$

121,865

$

(2,438,318)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per common share

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) per common share

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

0.13

$

0.00

 

 

$

(0.61)

$

0.03

$

(0.48)

$

0.03

 

 

Diluted

$

0.13

$

0.00

 

 

$

(0.61)

$

0.02

$

(0.48)

$

0.03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average common

shares outstanding -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

6,002,741

 

4,225,712

 

 

 

6,003,132

 

4,340,528

 

6,002,938

 

4,284,126

 

 

Diluted

 

6,002,741

 

4,225,741

 

 

 

6,003,132

 

4,517,629

 

6,002,938

 

4,374,143

 

 


See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.



4








GREEN PLAINS RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

FOR THE PERIOD FROM NOVEMBER 30, 2006 THROUGH MAY 31, 2007

(Unaudited)

 

Common Stock

 

Additional Paid-in

 

Retained

Earnings (Accumulated)

 

Total Stockholders'

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Deficit)

 

Equity

Balance at November 30, 2006

6,002,736

$

6,003

$

85,419,806

$

470,371

$

85,896,180

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Stock-based compensation to directors and employees

18,075

 

18

 

2,829,319

 

-

 

2,829,337

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Issuance of common stock for land

500

 

-

 

10,300

 

-

 

10,300

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Net loss for the period ended May 31, 2007

-

 

-

 

-

 

(2,908,689)

 

(2,908,689)

Balance at May 31, 2007

6,021,311

$

6,021

$

88,259,425

$

(2,438,318)

$

85,827,128


See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.  



45



GREEN PLAINS RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.

 (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 

For the Three Months Ended

February 28,

 

 For the Period

 From Inception

 On June 29,2004

Through

 February 28,

 

For the Six Months Ended

May 31,

 

For the Period

From Inception

On June 29, 2004

Through

May 31,

 

2007

 

2006

 

 2007

 

2007

 

2006

 

2007

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

$

777,243

$

11,828

$

1,247,614

Adjustments to reconcile net income to

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$

(2,908,689)

$

121,865

$

(2,438,318)

Adjustments to reconcile net income(loss) to

 

 

 

 

 

 

net cash used by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock based compensation

 

1,653

 

50,000

 

232,403

 

2,829,337

 

143,250

 

3,060,087

Depreciation

 

7,560

 

2,614

 

22,464

 

19,093

 

4,606

 

33,987

Unrealized gains on derivative financial instruments

 

(1,799,988)

 

-

 

(1,832,363)

Deferred income taxes

 

562,000

 

-

 

523,200

Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments

 

(73,388)

 

-

 

(105,763)

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

 

(278,700)

 

-

 

(317,500)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest receivable

 

53,666

 

-

 

(129,944)

 

95,783

 

(73,956)

 

(87,827)

Prepaid expenses and deposits

 

(103,553)

 

(88,767)

 

 (630,075)

Prepaid expenses and other

 

(1,108,290)

 

(143,426)

 

 (1,634,812)

Derivative financial instruments

 

(86,613)

 

-

 

(452,113)

 

(169,487)

 

-

 

(534,987)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

(157,131)

 

(87,694)

 

579,497

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

(129,872)

 

(90,149)

 

606,756

Net cash used by operating activities

 

(745,163)

 

(112,019)

 

(439,327)

 

(1,724,213)

 

(37,810)

 

(1,418,377)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchase of property and equipment

 

(20,394,033)

 

(78,313)

 

(57,701,492)

 

(44,483,290)

 

(6,818,816)

 

(81,795,749)

Purchase of securities

 

-

 

-

 

(28,064,700)

 

-

 

-

 

(28,064,700)

Payment of recoverable rail line costs

 

-

 

(3,500,000)

 

(3,500,000)

 

-

 

(3,500,000)

 

(3,500,000)

Payments related to land option agreements

 

-

 

-

 

(26,500)

 

(5,000)

 

(17,500)

 

(31,500)

Cash acquired in acquisition of subsidiary

 

-

 

210,291

 

210,291

 

-

 

210,291

 

210,291

Sale of securities

 

-

 

3,464,816

 

28,064,700

 

-

 

28,064,700

 

28,064,700

Net cash provided (used) by investing activities

 

(20,394,033)

 

96,794

 

(61,017,701)

 

(44,488,290)

 

17,938,675

 

(85,111,958)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from the issuance of common stock

 

-

 

-

 

83,716,549

 

-

 

1,856,130

 

83,716,549

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

 

10,462,197

 

-

 

10,862,197

 

22,723,237

 

400,000

 

23,123,237

Payment of principal on long-term debt

 

(15,000)

 

-

 

(25,000)

 

(30,000)

 

-

 

(40,000)

Payment of loan fees and equity in creditors

 

(15,418)

 

(355,150)

 

(715,671)

 

(268,717)

 

(355,150)

 

(968,970)

Net cash provided (used) by financing activities

 

10,431,779

 

(355,150)

 

93,838,075

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

22,424,520

 

1,900,980

 

105,830,816

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net change in cash and equivalents

 

(10,707,417)

 

(370,375)

 

32,381,047

 

(23,787,983)

 

19,801,845

 

19,300,481

Cash and equivalents at beginning of period

 

43,088,464

 

5,794,936

 

-

 

43,088,464

 

5,794,936

 

-

Cash and equivalents at end of period

$

32,381,047

$

5,424,561

$

32,381,047

$

19,300,481

$

25,596,781

$

19,300,481

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for income taxes

$

365,504

$

-

$

365,504

Cash paid for interest

$

48,891

$

-

$

48,891



Continued on the following page


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



6


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continued from the previous page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued for acquisition of      subsidiary:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

$

-

$

210,291

$

210,291

Deposits related to option agreement

 

-

 

11,100

 

11,100

Site development costs

 

-

 

778,609

 

778,609

 Total non-cash consideration for acquisition

$

-

$

1,000,000

$

1,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property - Land for Superior Ethanol plant:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued for purchase of Superior plant land

$

-

$

-

$

478,510

Purchase accounting cost allocated to site development cost allocated to Superior plant land

 

386,856

 

-

 

719,846

Purchase accounting cost allocated to land options allocated to Superior plant land

 

100

 

-

 

10,100

Land option allocated to land purchases

 

10,000

 

 

 

10,000

 Total purchase of Superior plant land

$

396,956

$

-

$

1,218,456

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equipment - Construction-in-progress:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Construction-in-progress-capitalized interest from amortization of debt issuance costs

$

3,163

$

-

$

3,163

Construction-in-progress-accrual

 

4,687,228

 

50,875

 

4,687,228

Construction-in-progress-accrued retainage

 

4,069,603

 

-

 

4,069,603

   Total Accrued Construction-in-Progress

$

8,759,994

$

50,875

$

8,759,994


GREEN PLAINS RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.

 (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

Continued from the previous page

 

For the Six Months Ended

May 31,

 

 For the Period

 From Inception

 On June 29, 2004

Through

 May 31,

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

 2007


Supplemental disclosures of cash flow:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for income taxes

$

495,037

$

-

$

495,037

Cash paid for interest

$

359,695

$

-

$

359,695


Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued for acquisition of      subsidiary:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

$

-

$

210,291

$

210,291

Deposits related to option agreement

 

-

 

11,100

 

11,100

Site development costs

 

-

 

778,609

 

778,609

 Total non-cash consideration for acquisition

$

-

$

1,000,000

$

1,000,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property - Land for Superior Plant:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock issued for purchase of land

$

10,300

$

478,510

$

488,810

Transfer of site development costs to land

 

386,856

 

-

 

719,846

Purchase accounting cost allocated to land options transferred to land

 

100

 

-

 

10,100

Land option cost transferred to land

 

10,000

 

 

 

10,000

 Total purchase of land for Superior plant

$

407,256

$

478,510

$

1,228,756

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equipment - Construction-in-progress:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capitalized interest from amortization of debt issuance costs

$

10,565

$

-

$

10,565

Change in accrued construction liabilities

 

4,483,747

 

2,553,066

 

9,823,123

Change in construction retainage liabilities

 

1,986,644

 

817,257

 

5,614,990

   Total non-cash construction costs

$

6,480,956

$

3,370,323

$

15,448,678


See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.



67



GREEN PLAINS RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.

(A DEVELOMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)


1.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION


Green Plains Renewable Energy, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Company") isWe are a later stage development company incorporated on June 29, 2004 under the laws of the state of Iowa. Green Plains Renewable Energy, Inc. wasWe were organized to construct and operate dry mill, fuel grade ethanol plants (the "Plants").plants. Construction on the Company’sof our first Plant,plant, located in Shenandoah, Iowa, began in April of 2006.  In August 2006, construction began on a second plant, similar to the Shenandoah facility, in Superior, Iowa. OurThe Shenandoah and Superior ethanol production facilitiesplants under construction are name-plate 50 million gallon per year (“mmgy”) plants. Name-plate means the plants are guaranteedplant is designed by the Design Buildersdesign builders and the process technology providers to produce at least 50 million gallonsthe stated quantity of ethanol per year once it becomes operational. At name-plate capacity, each of the Plants become operational. The Shenandoah Plant is being built by Fagen, Inc. (“Fagen”). ICM is the process technology provider for that Plant. Agra Industrie s is building the Superior, Iowa Plant and weplants are using Delta T as the technology provider for this Plant. We are building the Plantsexpected to, each haveon an annual capacity to processbasis, consume approximately 18 million bushels of corn into approximately 50 million gallons of ethanol and produce, in addition to ethanol, approximately 160,000 tons annually of animal feed known as Distillers Dried Grainsdistillers dried grains with Solublessolubl es (“DDGS”) on a dry matter basis. Distillers’ grains are. In addition, the principal by-products of the ethanol production process. The Plantsplants will alsoeach produce approximately 148148,000 tons of CO². However, because the Iowa marketcarbon dioxide annually which is saturated with CO² dueexpected to the number of ethanol plants in Iowa, we intend to scrub the CO² produced at the Plantsbe scrubbed and vent it off.vented.


The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of November 30, 2006, which has been derived from  our audited consolidated financial statements as filed in our annual report for the period ended November 30, 2006, and the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements, have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and include the accounts of Green Plains Renewable Energy, Inc. (GPRE) and its wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiary Superior Ethanol, LLC.  GPRE and its subsidiary are collectively referred to as the “Company”.L.L.C.  All material inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain information and notefootnote disclosures normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations.  The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with thet he consolidated financial statements included in our Form 10-K (the “Annual Report”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and notes thereto and risk factors contained therein for the fiscal year ended November 30, 20062006.


In the opinion of Management, the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements as of February 28,May 31, 2007 contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.


Management is required to make certain estimates and assumptions which affect the amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses the Company haswe reported and itsour disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements.  The results of the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year.


Recently issued accounting standards - In February, 2007 the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“FASB”SFAS”) issued FASNo. 159,The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—Liabilities.”including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.  This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions.  This statement is expected to expand the use of fair market value measurement, which is consistent with long-term measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Management doesWe do not expect the adoption of this statement to be significantsignifica nt to the Company’sour consolidated financial statements.



7

8



2.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT – NET  


The components of property and equipment are as follows:


 

February 28,

2007

 

November 30,

2006

 

May 31,

2007

 

November 30,

2006

Land and improvements

$

5,186,181

$

3,521,013

$

5,198,562

$

3,521,013

Construction-in-progress

 

62,301,778

 

43,480,379

 

93,081,811

 

43,480,379

Computer equipment and software

 

127,719

 

33,454

 

121,173

 

33,454

Office furniture and equipment

 

32,679

 

30,251

 

35,052

 

30,251

Leasehold improvements

 

1,311

 

1,310

 

1,310

 

1,310

Vehicles

 

30,274

 

30,274

 

30,274

 

30,274

 

67,679,942

 

47,096,681

 

98,468,182

 

47,096,681

Less: accumulated depreciation

 

(22,454)

 

(14,894)

 

(33,987)

 

(14,894)

$

67,657,488

$

47,081,787

$

98,434,195

$

47,081,787


During the threesix months ended February 28,May 31, 2007 the Companywe purchased approximately 215 acres ofadditional land in Dickinson County for the Superior Iowa plant.  The CompanyWe paid $1,259,829$1,261,910 cash for the land including certain fees and $10,300 in common stock. In addition, $396,956 was reallocated to land. The reallocation to land included Site Development Costs of $386,856 related to the acquisition of Superior Ethanol, LLCsite development and $10,100 of land option costs. The remaining $8,383 ofcosts previously reflected as Other Assets, were transferred to Property and Equipment and are included now in land and improvements were related to the Shenandoah plant.above.  


The CompanyWe capitalized interest, including amortization of $123,270debt issuance costs, of $372,640 and $495,910 in construction-in-progress for the three monthsand six month periods ended February 28, 2007. The capitalized interest included interest of $120,107 on our long-term debt and $3,163 from the amortization of debt issuance costs. All interest was capitalized to construction-in-progress for the three month period ended February 28,May 31, 2007, because the Company invested $12,564,335 for construction-in-progress on the Shenandoah project which was in excess of the loan draws, therefore, all the draws were deemed for construction-in-progress.


Accruals and retainage for land improvements and construction-in-progress and capitalized interest from the amortization of debt issuance costs are considered non-cash investing activities, therefore they are not included as purchases of property and equipment in the Statements of Cash Flows.  The construction-in-progress accruals and retainage of $8,756,831 and $8,967,722 at February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006, respectively, are detailed in the Footnote 4 – Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses.respectively.


3.

OTHER ASSETS

The components of other assets are as follows:


 

February 28,

2007

 

November 30,

2006

 

May 31,

2007

 

November 30,

2006

Recoverable rail line costs

$

3,500,000

$

3,500,000

$

3,500,000

$

3,500,000

Debt issuance costs

 

710,507

 

698,252

Site development costs from acquisition

 

58,763

 

445,619

Debt issuance costs, net

 

954,405

 

698,252

Site development costs

 

58,763

 

445,619

Land option agreements

 

17,500

 

27,600

 

22,500

 

27,600

Equity in lenders related to debt issuance

 

2,000

 

2,000

 

4,000

 

2,000

Long-term deferred tax assets

 

-

 

55,200

 

-

 

55,200

$

4,288,770

$

4,728,671

$

4,539,668

$

4,728,671




8



During the quartersix month period ended February 28,May 31, 2007, the Companywe incurred $12,255$240,500 of debt issuance costs related to drawing funds onloan agreements for the Shenandoah plant loans.  The CompanySuperior plant.  We transferred $386,856$396,956 of site development and land option costs from the acquisition of Superior Ethanol, LLC to land upon the exercise of approximately 70 acres in Dickinson County, Iowa.  In addition, the Company exercised an option to purchase approximately 145 acres in Dickinson County, Iowa andland for a portion of the option cost of $10,000 was transferred to land as a cost to acquire the land.  Both parcels will be used for theSuperior plant in Superior, Iowa. Long-term deferred tax assets were adjusted to reflect changes and netted against long-term tax liabilities.site.  


4.

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSESLIABILITIES


The components of the Company’s accounts payable and accrued expensesliabilities are as follows:


 

 

February 28,

2007

 

November 30,

2006

Accrued land improvements

$

-

$

36,854

Accrued land improvements retainage

 

-

 

123,809

Accrued construction-in-progress

 

4,687,228

 

5,302,522

Accrued construction- in-progress-retainage

 

4,069,603

 

3,504,537

Accrued income taxes

 

-

 

364,800

Accrued operating costs

 

579,498

 

371,830

 

$

9,336,329

$

9,704,352

 

 

May 31,

2007

 

November 30,

2006

Accounts payable

$

8,722,110

$

4,910,387

Accrued liabilities

 

1,894,933

 

800,819

Accrued construction retainage

 

5,614,991

 

3,628,346

Accrued income taxes

 

-

 

364,800

 

$

16,232,034

$

9,704,352


Accrued construction-in-progress

9



At May 31, 2007, and retainage includes $451,200 of accrualsNovember 30, 2006, accounts payable and accrued liabilities include $15,438,114 and $8,973,829, respectively for costs related to land and improvements, and construction-in-progress.  Changes in these balances during the period of invoicing cut-off from February 25 to February 28, 2007.  The accruals above for land improvements, land improvements-retainage, construction-in- progress and construction-in-progress-retainageperiods are considered non-operating and non-cash investing activities, and are therefore they are not included asexcluded from purchases of property and equipment in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.


5.

LONG-TERM DEBT

The components of the Company’s long-term debt are as follows:


 

 

February 28,

2007

 

November 30,

2006

Loan Agreements

$

10,462,197

$

-

Economic Development Loan

 

275,000

 

290,000

Grants

 

100,000

 

100,000

     

 

10,837,197

 

390,000

Less: current portion

 

2,460,000

 

60,000

 

$

8,377,197

$

330,000

 

 

May 31,

2007

 

November 30,

2006

Shenandoah loan

$

22,723,237

$

-

Superior loan

 

-

 

-

Economic development loan

 

260,000

 

290,000

Economic development grant

 

100,000

 

100,000

     

 

23,083,237

 

390,000

Less: current portion

 

1,260,000

 

60,000

 

$

21,823,237

$

330,000


Shenandoah Loan Agreements


Agreement

On February 6, 2006, the Companywe entered into a Master Loan Agreement, Construction and Term Loan Supplement, Construction and Revolving Term Loan Supplement, Security Agreement and Real Estate Mortgage with Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (individually and collectively, the “Loan Agreements”“Shenandoah Loan Agreement”) for the construction of the Shenandoah plant.. A participating interest under the Shenandoah Loan DocumentsAgreement was transferred to CoBank, ACB. This agreement required a $1,000 equity investment in both Farm Credit Services of America and CoBank. Under the Shenandoah Loan Agreements,Agreement, the lenders will lendloan up to $47,000,000. The loan proceeds are$47,000,000 to partially finance construction of the Shenandoah Plant and to provide funding for working capital purposes.  ThisIn December 2006, we complied with all conditions precedent and began drawing on the credit line is available after the required equity has been used for the construction of the plant in Shenandoah Plant.after first, as required under the Shenandoah Loan Agreement, spending the equity we had committed to build the Shenandoah plant. The loan is comprised of a $30,000,000 amortizing term loan and a $17,000,000 revolving term facility.





9The Shenandoah Loan Agreement was amended effective May 31, 2007, to reflect the current construction costs and schedule for the Shenandoah plant, to modify certain covenants and repayment requirements, and to reflect changes that had been agreed to as a result of our acquisition of Superior Ethanol.  The following summarizes the significant terms of the Shenandoah Loan Agreement as amended.



Loan Commitments and Repayment Terms –


·

Term Loan – This loan is available for advances until JulyDecember 1, 2007.  Principal payments are to commence thereafter with $1,200,000 due NovemberMay 20, 2007,2008, and each quarter thereafter with a final maturity on Novemberor before May 20, 2013 at the latest.2014. In addition, for each fiscal years ending in 2007 and thereafter,year, we are also required to make a special paymentpayments equal to 65% of the available (if any) free cash flow from operations, not to exceed $2,000,000 per year, provided, however, that if such payments would result in a covenant default under the Shenandoah Loan Agreements,Agreement, the amount of the payments shall be reduced to an amount which would not result in a covenant default. The free cash flow payments are discontinued when the aggregate total received from such payments exceeds $8,000,000.


·

Revolving Term – This loan is available for advances throughout the life of the commitment. ThisAllowable advances under this loan requires semi-annualare reduced by $2,400,000 payments on/step-downs of the commitment to commenceeach six month period commencing on the first day of the month beginning approximately six months after repayment of the term loan, by Maybut in no event later than November 1, 2014, atwith the latest with a final maturity no later than November 1, 2017.




10



Pricing and fees –


·

The loans will bear interest at either the Agent Base Rate (prime) plus 0%-1/2% (based on a ratio of total equity0.00% to total assets)0.50% or short-term fixed rates at LIBOR (1, 3 or 6 month) +285plus 2.85% to +335 basis points (based3.35% (each based on a ratio of total equity to total assets).


·

The LendersWe may, however, allow the Company to elect to pay interest at a fixed interest rate to be determined.determined by the Lenders.


·

OriginationWe have incurred origination fees of $352,500, $2,000 for equity in lenders of $2,000 and other fees in the amount of $106,260 have been incurred by the Company$117,060 through February 28,May 31, 2007.  Appraisal, inspecting engineer, and title Company insurance and disbursing fees are at the Company’sour expense.


·

There are annual administrative fees of $25,000 beginning November 20, 2006.


·

An unused commitment fee of ½%0.50% on the $17,000,000 Revolving Term Loan began on February 1, 2007.


Availability of Advances, Interest Rates and Fees –


Advances are subject to satisfaction of specified lending conditions. Advances correlate to budget and construction timeline projections, with verification of progress by a third-party engineer.


Security –


As security for the loans, the lenders received a first-position lien on all personal property and real estate owned by us,we own, including an assignment of all contracts and rights pertinent to construction and on-going operations of the Plant.  The Company will be required to maintain certain financial and non-financial covenants during the term of the loans.



10plant.  



Representations, Warranties andSummary of Loan Covenants –


The Shenandoah Loan Agreements contain representations, warranties, conditions precedent,Agreement contains affirmative covenants (including financial covenants) and negative covenants.covenants including:


·

The Loan Agreements requireMaintenance of working capital (current assets over current liabilities in accordance with GAAP consistently applied) of not less than $5,000,000 at the earlier of commencement of operations or by MayOctober 31, 2007 and increasing to $6,000,000 at fiscal year ending 2007,effective May 31, 2008, and there after,thereafter, except that in determining current assets, any amounts available under the Revolving Term Loan (less the amount that would be considered a current liability under GAAP if fully advanced) may be included.  


·

The Loan Agreements requireMaintenance of net worth (total assets over total liabilities in accordance with GAAP consistently applied) of $31,000,000 million,$34,000,000, increasing to $32,000,000 at fiscal year ending 2007,$35,500,000 effective May 31, 2008, and increasing to $34,000,000$37,500,000 at fiscal year ending 2008 and thereafter.  


·

The Loan Agreements requireMaintenance of Debt Service Coverage Ratio of not less than 1.5 to 1.0 for fiscal year end 20072008 and thereafter.  Debt Service Coverage Ratio is defined as (all as calculated for the most current year-end in accordance with GAAP consistently applied): 1) net income (after taxes), plus depreciation and amortization,; divided by 2) all current portions of regularly scheduled long term debt for the prior period (previous fiscal year end).




11



·

In addition,Restrictions on dividends or other distributions to stockholders will be limited toof no more than 40% of the profit, net of income taxes for each fiscal year, and may be paidallowable only where we are expected to remain in compliance with all loan covenants, terms and conditions. Furthermore, with respect to the fiscal years ending in 2008 and thereafter, an additional distribution may be made to stockholders in excess of the 40% limit for such fiscal year if we have made the required free cash flow payment for/based onfor such fiscal year, and will thereafter remain in compliance with all loan covenants, terms and conditions on a pro forma basis net of saidsuch potential additional payment. ThereWe are currently in compliance with all covenants under the Shenandoah Loan Agreement; however, there can be no assurance that we can remain in compliance with all loan covenants.covenants in the future.


During the three months ended February 28, 2007, the Company began drawingAll amounts outstanding on the credit line for the construction of the Shenandoah Plant after fulfilling the equity requirement as well as all necessary conditions precedent to funding.  At February 28,Loan Agreement at May 31, 2007, the Company hadwere drawn $10,462,197 on the term loan and wasloan.  At May 31, 2007, we were paying interest based on the Agent Base Rate of 8.25% plus .5% oradvances outstanding at 8.75% percent and incurred total interest (including amortization of $113,496 on the drawn funds. In addition, on February 1, 2007, the Company began paying the unused commitment feedebt issuance costs) of ½% on the available $17,000,000 revolving term loan for $6,611.  All interest was capitalized to construction-in-progress$418,472 and $541,758 for the three and six month periodperiods ended February 28, 2007 because the Company invested $12,564,335 for construction-in-progress which was in excess of the loan draws, therefore, all the draws were deemed for construction-in-progress.May 31, 2007.  


Superior Loan Agreement


On October 16, 2006 the Company entered into a Commitment Letter for $51,600,000 with Farm Credit Services, FLCA.  This agreement is withMarch 21, 2007, Superior Ethanol LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company to provide partial funding for the construction of the Superior Plant and was expected to be finalized during the second quarter of fiscal 2007. The Company has incurred debt issuance costs of $254,910 as of February 28, 2007 related to securing this loan agreement.


Economic Development Loans and Grants

At November 30, 2006, the Company classified $330,000 as long-term debt and $60,000 as current portion of long-term debt based on a $290,000 note and $100,000 grant with the Iowa Department of Economic Development (IDED).  The Company paid $15,000 ($5,000/month) during the three months ended February 28, 2007 on this obligation.




11



In April 2005, the Iowa Department of Economic Development (IDED) awarded the Company a High-Quality Job Creation (HQJC) financing incentive comprised of a $300,000 zero interest loan and a $100,000 forgivable loan (grant) for the Shenandoah project.  The IDED funds became available for use by the Company in March, 2006 - upon closing of the senior debt financing commitment.  Associated with this award are job creation covenants.  The Company believes those covenants will be fulfilled.  The Shenandoah project has been awarded a tax incentive package from the Iowa Department of Economic Development under their High Quality Job Creation (HQJC) program with, according to the IDED, an estimated value of approximately $3.5 million.


The $300,000 zero interest loan terms are $5,000 per month for sixty months beginning October 1, 2006. The $100,000 grant was recorded as long-term debt as the covenants related to jobs creation have not been fulfilled.  The intention is that when the initial requirements have been fulfilled, the creation of the 33 full time jobs with 21 qualifying as High Quality Jobs, the Company will record the $100,000 grant as other income.  


6.

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY


The following was the activity during the three months ending February 28, 2007:


In February 2007, the Company issued 75 shares of the Company’s common stock to three different employees (25 shares each) as gifts.  The shares were valued at fair market value based on upon the current market price of $22.04 per share.


The Company had net income of $777,243 and $11,828 for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Company has accumulated earnings of $1,247,615 since inception on June 29, 2004 through February 28, 2007.


The Company has not paid any dividends since inception. Dividends to shareholders are restricted by the Company’s credit agreements as described in Footnote 5 – Long-term Debt and Credit Lines.


The following is a review of prior period activities:


In July 2004, the Company issued 400,000 and 150,000 shares of common stock to the founders of the Company for cash and services, respectively.  The shares were issued in consideration of cash and services totaling $100,000 and $37,500, respectively.  The shares for services were issued at $.25 per share based upon the issuance of the stock to the founders.


In August, October and November 2004, the Company issued 73,000 shares of common stock to directors for cash totaling $182,500.


In August, September, October and November 2004, the Company issued 142,000 shares of common stock to various non-related individuals and entities for cash totaling $355,000 less $1,712 of offering costs.


In November 2005, the Company issued 3,445,990 shares of common stock to various non-related individuals and entities for cash totaling $34,459,900.  The Company incurred $256,658 of costs related to this offering.


In November 2005, the Company issued 5,000 shares of common stock to a director for services valued at $50,000 or $10 per share. The value assigned was at the recent IPO issuance price of $10 per share.


In January 2006, the Company issued 5,000 shares of common stock to an engineering firm for services valued at $50,000 or $10 per share.  The value assigned was at the recent IPO issuance price of $10 per share.


In February 2006, the Company issued 100,000 shares to a director in exchange for 100% ownership in Superior Ethanol, LLC. Superior Ethanol, LLC had cash of $210,291 in its accounts, holds options on real estate, property tax abatements and other assets in an area where the Company is building its second ethanol Plant in Superior, Iowa. The value assigned was at the recent IPO issuance price of $10 per share.




12



In May 2006, the Company issued 10,900 shares to a director in exchange for land.  The shares were valued at fair market value at the then current market price of $43.90 per share.  The land purchase was approximately 68 acres of land near Superior Iowa in Dickinson County where the Company is building a 50 Million Gallon, Fuel Grade Ethanol Plant.


In May 2006, the Company issued 2,500 shares valued at $93,250 based upon fair market value at the then current market price of $37.30 per share to the Shenandoah Chamber and Industry Association as a gift to enhance the Community of Shenandoah, Iowa.


On July 31, 2006, the Company closed on a second public offering and issued 1,600,069 shares of common stock to various non-related individuals and entities for cash totaling $48,002,069.  The Company incurred $1,173,671 of fees and costs related to this offering.


Purchasers of the Company’s IPO that closed in November of 2005 bought 3,445,990 shares of the Company’s common stock at $10 per share. Each share purchased in the offering was accompanied by a warrant. Four warrants are needed to purchase one share of common stock at $30 per share. Said warrants expire on December 31, 2007. The Company’s common stock was trading above the $30 strike price in the past. During these times, some of the Company’s shareholders exercised their warrants. As of November 30, 2006, shareholders had exercised 273,108 warrants for which 68,277 shares of the Company’s common shares were issued at $30 per share, plus transfer fees, for total proceeds of $2,049,120. As of February 28, 2007 there were 3,172,884 warrants outstanding that could be exercised for a total of 793,221 shares of common stock.  If all warrants still outstanding were to be exercised, the Company would realize an additional $23,796,630 of capital.


Purchasers of the Company’s second public offering, which closed on July 31, 2006, bought 1,600,069 shares of common stock at $30.00 per share.  Each share purchased in the offering was accompanied by a warrant.  Five warrants are needed to purchase one share of common stock at $60.00 per share.  The total warrants in the offering were 1,600,069 for equivalent shares of 320,014. The warrants have a call option that can be exercised on twenty days’ notice, subject to the price being above $72 for twenty consecutive trading days; otherwise the warrants can be exercised at any time through December 31, 2008.  To date, no warrants issued in the second public offering have been exercised.  As of the date hereof, all of the warrants issued in the IPO and second public offering are out of the money and there can be no assurance that any outstanding warrants will ever be exercised.


7.

EARNINGS PER SHARE


The following table sets forth the computation of earnings per share for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006:


 

 

February 28,

2007

 

February 28,

2006

Numerator:

 

 

 

 

Net income

$

777,243

$

11,828

   

 

 

 

 

Denominator:

 

 

 

 

Denominator for basic earnings per share-

Weighted-average shares outstanding

 

6,002,741

 

4,225,712

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

 

 

 

Warrants from IPO

 

-

 

-

Warrants from second public offering

 

-

 

-

   

 

 

 

 

Denominator for diluted earnings per share – weighted-average share outstanding and assumed conversions

 

6,002,741

 

4,225,712

   

 

 

 

 

Earnings (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

Basic

$

0.13

$

0.00

Diluted

$

0.13

$

0.00




13



8.

INCOME TAXES


The pre- tax income for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:



 

 

February 28, 2007

 

February 28, 2006

Income before income taxes

$

1,291,943

$

11,828



The current and deferred components of income tax expense (benefit) for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006 are as follow:




 

 

February 28,

2007

 

February 28,

2006

Current:

 

 

 

 

Federal    

$

(267,500)

$

4,900

State

 

(49,200)

 

1,500

Total current

 

(316,700)

 

6,400

   

 

 

 

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

Federal    

 

642,500

 

(4,900)

State

 

188,900

 

(1,500)

Total deferred

 

831,400

 

(6,400)

   

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

$

514,700

$

-



Total income tax expense (benefit) differed from the amount computed by applying the U.S. Federal statutory rates of 34% for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006.



 

 

February 28,

2007

 

February 28,

2006

Tax expense (benefit) at U.S. Federal statutory rate    

$

439,300

$

4,000

State tax expense (benefit), net of Federal tax effect

 

67,700

 

1,300

Impact of permanent items

 

600

 

1,100

Change in effective tax rate

 

(100)

 

-

Other

 

7,200

 

-

Valuation adjustment

 

-

 

(6,400)

Income tax expense (benefit)

$

514,700

$

-





14



Deferred tax assets and liabilities as of February 28, 2007 and November 30, 2006 are summarized as follows:



 

 

February 28,

2007

 

November 30,

2006

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

   Net operating loss carry-forwards

$

323,500

$

-

 

 

 

 

 

Non-Current:

 

 

 

 

Equity for services    

 

22,000

 

55,200

Other

 

6,800

 

0

Total non-current deferred tax      assets

 

28,800

 

55,200

Gross deferred tax assets

 

352,300

 

55,200

Less: valuation allowance

 

-

 

-

Net deferred tax assets

 

352,300

 

55,200

   

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Current:   

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments

 

806,200

 

13,000

Other temporary differences

 

-

 

3,400

Total current deferred tax liabilities

 

806,200

 

16,400

Non-Current:   

 

 

 

 

    Depreciation for tax in excess of book

 

69,300

 

-

Gross deferred tax liabilities

 

875,500

 

16,400

Less: valuation allowance

 

-

 

-

Net deferred tax liabilities

 

875,500

 

16,400

Deferred income taxes

$

523,200

$

38,800


In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.  Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.


During 2005 and 2004, the Company established a valuation allowance for all deferred tax assets and tax liabilities as the Company was in the early start-up phase and any future income or tax benefits was uncertain. The Company did not provide for valuation allowances for 2006 due to the determination based on industry trends that it is more likely than not that the benefit of the deferred taxable assets will be realized


For the three months ended February 28, 2007 the Company incurred an unrealized gain of $1,799,988 on derivative financial instruments increasing the resulting deferred tax liability to $806,200. The resulting tax loss excluding this gain produced a deferred tax asset of $323,500.  The Company believes that all deferred income taxes will be realized based on the past results of the company and profitability of other similar companies.  For financial statement presentation, the Company has offset all current deferred tax liabilities and assets and offset all non-current liabilities and assets as single amounts.




15



9.

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS


On October 1, 2006, the Company established a comprehensive Employee Benefits Plan that includes Health, Dental, Prescription Drugs, Flexible Spending Account, Vision, Life and Accidental Death, Short-term Disability and Long-term Disability.  Additionally, the Company offers a Simple IRA plan that enables eligible employees to save on a tax-deferred basis up to the limits allowable under the Internal Revenue Service Code and that requires the Company to offer matching contributions not less than 3% of participating employee salaries for two calendar years of a five year period.  Employees with at least 31 days of service are eligible to participate in the Employee Benefits Plan.  The Company provided matching contributions up to 2% of participating employee salaries totaling $4,403 and $0 for three months ended February 28, 2007, respectively. The Company provided matching contributions $6,511 for the period of June 29, 2004 (Inception) through Februa ry 28, 2007. The Company expects to pay significantly more in this fiscal year than prior years due to the ramp up of employees to manage and operate the Company.


10.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


Plant Construction


Shenandoah –


In October 2005, we entered into an agreement with Fagen Engineering for design services for the Phase I and II Pre Engineering work to be done at the Plant site by the Company, prior to turning the site over to Fagen, Inc. for the construction of the Plant itself. The Company agreed to pay Fagen Engineering a lump sum fee for said engineering. However, said amount is included as part of the total cost of the Plant itself, as outlined in the Design Build Contract we have entered into with Fagen, Inc. (“Fagen”), which is anticipated to be $55,881,454. Therefore, the cost of the pre-engineering design services will be deducted from the total cost of Plant, once the plant is completed. The pre-engineering contract was completed during the quarter ended August 31, 2006 and all payments were made to Fagen as we were invoiced.


On January 13, 2006, we entered into a construction agreement with Fagen Inc., under which Fagen, Inc. will provide all work and services in connection with the engineering, design, procurement, construction startup, performances tests, training for the operation and maintenance of its Plant and provide all material, equipment, tools and labor necessary to complete the Plant. As consideration for the services to be performed, Fagen, Inc. will be paid $55,881,454, subject to adjustments. The Company has made all required payments to Fagen, Inc. based upon monthly application for payment.


The Company was required to pay an initial payment of $5,000,000, less retainage, at the time of the notice to proceed. The Company made this payment and is required to make payments to Fagen, Inc. based upon monthly applications for payment.  The Company paid $11.4 million for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and $37.8 since work began on the contract. At February 28, 2007, the Company owed Fagen $2,928,559 (net of retainage) for progress billings through February 25, 2007 and used a days approach to accrue an additional $258,400 for the February 26 through February 28, 2006 stub period for services rendered for that period. At February 28, 2007, accrued retainage for Fagen, Inc. was $2,794,073.


If Fagen completes that Plant early, we will have to pay Fagen an early completion bonus. If this were to happen, we could expend any extra cash we may have on hand by paying the early completion bonus. However, our contract with Fagen stipulates that under certain conditions, payment of any early completion bonus can be converted to a note and paid in installments.


In February 2006, we entered into an agreement with Mathiowetz Construction to do the grading and dirt work at the site in Shenandoah, Iowa to prepare the site for Fagen so construction on the Plant could commence. The original contract was for approximately $1.75 million. There were a change orders for an additional sums of $318,447. We have been billed and paid $2,068,266 through February 28, 2007 completing the contract.




16



In April 2006, we entered into an agreement with Peterson Contractors, Inc. to install the geopiers to support certain buildings to be constructed at the Plant. The contract was for $1,062,000 and the Company paid $1,062,000 for the work completing the contract in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006.


In June 2006, we entered into an agreement with Kelly-Hill Company to rehabilitate a small portion of the existing rail spur running directly south of the Plant in Shenandoah that is deemed industrial track. We are currently leasing this track from BNSF, but will eventually purchase it from them for a nominal amount. As part of said agreement, Kelly-Hill will also construct additional track at the Plant in Shenandoah, Iowa.  The contract is for $341,549 and as of February 28, 2007 the Company had paid $21,787 and accrued retainage of $7,050 for completed construction. The Company owed Kelly-Hill Company $72,491 at February 28, 2007.


In July 2006, we entered into an agreement with Sunderman, Inc. to build the administrative building to support our operations at the Shenandoah Plant.  The contract is for approximately $289,000 with change orders.  At February 28, 2007 the Company had paid $215,673 for completed construction.


In July 2006, we entered into and agreement with McCormick Construction Company, Inc for auger cast pilings for the grain silo area at the site in Shenandoah, Iowa.  The original contract was for $337,100 and change orders for $149,000 have been added. At February 28, 2007 the Company has paid $461,795 for completed work and has recorded accrued retainage of $24,305.


In January, 2006 work began on the Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Project at the City of Shenandoah.  The Company has agreed to fund this Project with the City of Shenandoah.  This Project is contracted at $989,700 and the Company has accrued $89,775 and accrued retainage of $4,725 for completed work on this project.


In February 2007 the Company entered into a construction management agreement with Engineering & Construction Services to manage the Shenandoah Plant project. The agreement is $15,000 per month for six months plus a percentage of cost savings. We have paid $15,000 through February 28, 2007.


Superior –


In August 2006, our wholly owned subsidiary, Superior Ethanol, LLC entered into a construction agreement with Agra Industries, Inc. under which Agra Industries, Inc. will provide all work and services in connection with the engineering, design, procurement, construction startup, performance tests, training for the operation and maintenance of the Plant and provide all materials, equipment, tools and labor necessary to complete the Plant in Superior, Iowa. As consideration for the services to be performed, Agra Industries, Inc. will be paid $75,953,276, subject to adjustments. The Company was required to pay an initial payment of $7,595,328, less retainage, and has paid $14,891,952 for completed work and has recorded accrued retainage of $1,239,450. At February 28, 2007, the Company owed Agra Industries, Inc. $1,594,965 (net of retainage) for progress billings through February 24th, 2007 and used an estimate from Agra to accrue an additional $192,800 for the February 25 through February 28, 2007 stub period for completed construction.


The Agra Industries, Inc. contract includes an early completion bonus for $2,500 per day if substantial completion occurs in advance of the required substantial completion date of November 30, 2007, provided that the facility meets 100% of the performance guarantees within ninety days following the actual date of substantial completion.  Substantial completion is achieved when (i) the project has been constructed according to the approved plans and specifications therefore and so certified by Agra Industries, Inc. (ii) a certificate of occupancy has been issued for the project by the applicable governmental authority (if required) (iii) the punch list provided for in the agreement has been agreed by the Company and Agra Industries, Inc., and (iv)  each of the applicable performance guarantees achieve a ninety percent (90%) or better result.


In September 2006, Superior Ethanol, LLC, entered into a construction management agreement with Engineering & Construction Services to manage the Superior Plant project. The agreement is for $10,000 per month plus a percentage of cost savings. To date, we have paid $60,000 and $23,780 for cost savings and other costs.




17



Loan Agreements and Grants


Shenandoah –


Farm Credit Services of America (FLCA) - On February 6, 2006, the Company entered into a Master Loan Agreement, Construction and Term Loan Supplement, Construction and Revolving Term Loan Supplement, Security Agreement and Real Estate Mortgage with Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (individually and collectively, the “Loan Agreements”“Superior Loan Agreement”). A participating interest under the Superior Loan DocumentsAgreement was transferred to CoBank, ACB.  This agreement required a $1,000 equity investment in both Farm Credit Services of America and CoBank. Under the Superior Loan Agreements,Agreement, the lenders will lend up to $47,000,000. The loan proceeds are$50,000,000 to partially finance construction of the Shenandoah PlantSuperior plant and to provide funding for working capital purposes. This credit line is available after the required equity has been used for the construction of the Shenandoah Plant.Superior plant.  The loan is comprised of a $30,000,000$40,000,000 amortizing term loan and a $17,000,000$10,000,000 revolving term facility. The following summarizes the significant terms of the Superior Loan Agreement.



Loan Commitments and Repayment Terms The Loan Agreements are comprised of a $30,000,000 amortizing term loan and a $17,000,000 revolving term facility.


·

Term Loan – This loan is available for advances until July 1,December 31, 2007.  Principal payments are to commence thereafter with $1,200,000$1,375,000 due NovemberJuly 20, 2007,2008, and each quarter thereafter with a final maturity on Novemberor before July 20, 2013 at the latest.2015. In addition, for each fiscal years ending in 2007 and thereafter,year, we are also required to make a special paymentpayments equal to 65%75% of the available (if any) free cash flow from operations, not to exceed $2,000,000 per year, provided, however, that if such payments would result in a covenant default under the Superior Loan Agreements,Agreement, the amount of the payments shall be reduced to an amount which would not result in a covenant default. The free cash flow payments are discontinued when the aggregate total received from such payments exceeds $8,000,000$10,000,000.


·

Revolving Term – This loan is available for advances throughout the life of the commitment. ThisAllowable advances under this loan requires semi-annual $2,400,000 payments on/step-downs of the commitment to commenceare reduced by $2,500,000 each six month period commencing on the first day of the month beginning approximately six months after repayment of the term loan, by Maybut in no event later than July 1, 2014 at2015, with the latest with a final maturity no later than NovemberJuly 1, 2017.



Pricing and fees –


·

The loans will bear interest at either Agent Base Rate (prime) minus 0.15% to plus 0%-1/2% (based on a ratio of total equity to total assets)0.25% or short-term fixed rates at LIBOR (1, 3 or 6 month) +2852.80% to 335 basis points (based3.15% (each depending on a ratio of total equity to total assets)whether the operations for the preceding fiscal year were profitable or unprofitable).


·

The lendersWe may, however, allow the Company to elect to pay interest at a fixed interest rate to be determined.determined by the Lenders.


·

OriginationWe have incurred origination fees of $352,500, $2,000 for$422,000, equity in lenders of $2,000 and other fees in the amount of $106,260 have been incurred by the Company$73,410 through February 28,May 31, 2007.  Appraisal, inspecting engineer, and title Company insurance and disbursing fees are at the Company’sour expense.




12



·

There are annual administrative fees of $25,000$35,000 beginning November 20, 2006.1, 2007.


·

An unused commitment fee of ½%0.75% on the $17,000,000$10,000,000 Revolving Term Loan began on February 1,March 15, 2007.




18



Availability of Advances, Interest Rates and Fees


Advances are subject to satisfaction of specified lending conditions. Advances correlate to budget and construction timeline projections, with verification of progress by a third-party engineer.


Security –


As security for the loans, the lenders received a first-position lien on all personal property and real estate owned by us,Superior Ethanol, including an assignment of all contracts and rights pertinent to construction and on-going operations of the Plant.  The Company will be required to maintain certain financial and non-financial covenants during the term of the loans.plant.  


Representations, Warranties andSummary of Loan Covenants –


 The Superior Loan Agreements contain representations, warranties, conditions precedent,Agreement contains affirmative covenants (including financial covenants) and negative covenants.covenants including:


·

The Loan Agreements require working capital (current assets over current liabilities in accordance with GAAP consistently applied)Maintenance of not less than $5,000,000 at the earlier of commencement of operations or by May 31, 2007 and increasing to $6,000,000 at fiscal year ending 2007, and there after, except that in determining current assets, any amounts available (less the amount that would be considered a current liability under GAAP if fully advanced) may be included.  


·

The Loan Agreements require net worth (total assets over total liabilities in accordance with GAAP consistently applied) of $31,000,000 million, increasing to $32,000,000 at fiscal year ending 2007, and increasing to $34,000,000 at fiscal year ending 2008 and thereafter.  


·

The Loan Agreements require Debt Service Coverage Ratio of 1.5 to 1.0 for fiscal year end 2007 and thereafter.  Debt Service Coverage Ratio is defined as (all as calculated for the most current year-end in accordance with GAAP consistently applied): 1) net income (after taxes), plus depreciation and amortization,; divided by 2) all current portion of regularly scheduled long term debt for the prior period (previous year end).


·

In addition, dividends or other distributions to stockholders will be limited to 40% of the profit net of income taxes for each fiscal year and may be paid only where we are expected to remain in compliance with all loan covenants, terms and conditions. Furthermore, with respect to the fiscal years ending in 2008 and thereafter, an additional distribution may be made to stockholders in excess of the 40% limit for such fiscal year if we have made the required free cash flow payment for/based on such fiscal year, and will thereafter remain in compliance with all loan covenants, terms and conditions on a pro forma basis net of said potential additional payment. There can be no assurance that we can remain in compliance with all loan covenants.


At November 30, 2006 the Company had not drawn on the credit line with Farm Credit Services of America and CoBank.  During the three months ended February 28, 2007, the Company began drawing on the credit line for the construction of the Plant in Shenandoah after fulfilling the equity requirement as well as all necessary conditions precedent to funding.  At February 28, 2007, the Company had drawn $10,462,197.


Iowa Department of Economic Development


In April 2005, we were awarded a $300,000 zero interest loan, and a $100,000 forgivable loan (grant) by the State of Iowa. We signed that agreement in August 2005. However, we could not receive the funds until the other funding for the Plant had been secured (equity and debt financing). On March 8, 2006, the $400,000 was received into the accounts of the Company. We have agreed to pay the $300,000 loan in installments of $5,000 per month over a 60 month period commencing on October 1, 2006.




19



Superior –


On October 16, 2006 the Company entered into a Commitment Letter for $51,600,000 with Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA.  This agreement is with Superior Ethanol, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Green Plains Renewable Energy, Inc. to provide partial funding for the construction of the Superior Plant and is expected to be finalized in early fiscal 2007. The Company has incurred debt issuance costs of $254,910 as of February 28, 2006 related to securing this loan agreement.


Subsequently, on March 21, 2007, Superior Ethanol, LLC entered into a Master Loan Agreement, Construction and Term Loan Supplement, Construction and Revolving Term Loan Supplement, Security Agreement and Real Estate Mortgage with Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (individually and collectively, the “Loan Agreements”). A participating interest under the Loan Documents was transferred to CoBank, ACB. This agreement required a $1,000 equity investment in both Farm Credit Services of America and CoBank. Under the Loan Agreements, the lenders will lend up to $50,000,000. The amount was lowered from the Commitment Letter based upon negotiations with the lenders. The loan proceeds are to partially finance construction of the Superior Plant and to provide funding for working capital purposes. This credit line is available after the required equity has been used for the construction of the Superior Plant.  The loan is comprised of a $40, 000,000 amortizing term loan and a $10,000,000 revolving term facility. Superior Ethanol, LLC paid loan origination fees of $422,000, $2,000 for equity in lenders and $73,410 for other debt issuance fees through the close the agreement. Superior Ethanol, LLC has not commenced drawing on this credit facility.


Utilities


Shenandoah –


On October 27, 2006, the Company entered into a capacity agreement with Kinder Morgan, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, to provide natural gas capacity on their pipeline to the Company for the Shenandoah facility.  The Company deposited $90,000 with Kinder Morgan for credit purposes and plans to replace this deposit with a Letter of Credit in the near future.


On October 27, 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with MidAmerican Energy to install a primary electric distribution system for the Shenandoah facility.  The Company will pay an “Excess Facilities” tariff of 1.75% of the installed cost on a monthly basis.  The cost is estimated to be approximately $500,000.  The Company may purchase this equipment from MidAmerican Energy in the future.


Superior –


The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Superior Ethanol, LLC is currently working on a Service Extension Agreement with Iowa Lakes Electric Cooperative to supply electrical distribution facilities to the Superior Plant. Superior Ethanol, LLC deposited $350,000 with Iowa Lakes Electric Cooperative for purchase commitments related to the project. Superior is also working out a final agreement with Northern Natural Gas Company to supply natural gas to the Superior facility.


Sales and Marketing


The Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Superior Ethanol, LLC have entered into exclusive agreements with Renewable Products Marketing Group, LLC (RPMG) for the sale of the total ethanol produced at both the Shenandoah and Superior Plants. The agreements are for one year commencing on the first day ethanol is shipped from the respective Plants.  After the one year contract commitment, if the agreements are not renewed, then the rail car leases entered into by RPMG will be assigned to the Company and Superior Ethanol, LLC.  The Company would assume the lease for 150 rail cars for approximately $650 per car per month for the remainder of an original seven year lease term. Superior Ethanol, LLC would assume the lease for 150 rail cars for approximately $700 per car per month for the remainder of an original ten year lease term.




20



The Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Superior Ethanol, LLC have entered into exclusive agreements with Commodity Specialists Company (CSC) for the sale of the total Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS), Wet Distillers Grains (WDG) and Solubles (Solubles) produced at both the Shenandoah and Superior Plants. These agreements are for one year commencing on the first day of production at each of the Plants.


In March, 2007, the Company executed a lease contract for 100 rail cars for a ten year period for $637 per car per month for the Shenandoah facility. It is anticipated that the Company will negotiate a similar lease agreement for rail cars for the Superior plant at some time in the future.  These rail cars will be utilized by the Company to ship Distillers Grains to customers.


Commodities - Corn


At February 28, 2007 the Company had entered into fixed price contracts for corn for a total of approximately 2.1 million bushels. The Company also has taken positions in corn futures and options to secure supply for operations.


11.

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS


On February 22, 2006, the Company acquired 100% of the equity of Superior Ethanol, LLC (Superior) pursuant to a Share Exchange Agreement for the purpose of building the Superior plant and also obtained land options on other potential sites. The sole shareholder was Brian Peterson, a director of the Company. The Company issued 100,000 shares of common stock based on a per share price of $10.00 in exchange for the shares of Superior. This price per share of $10.00 was based on the recent IPO price of $10.00 per share. Superior had cash, options for over 159 acres of land in Dickinson County, Iowa and the management of Superior had spent considerable time and resources to acquire the options and develop the project of building an ethanol plant on the land held by the options as well as other properties.  Therefore, the following summary is the purchase price allocation of the Superior Ethanol, LLC exchange transaction.   



Assets

 

Value

     Cash

$

210,291

     Land Options

 

11,100

     Site development costs

 

778,609

 

$

1,000,000



The Company has allocated the site development cost to the land based on acres.  The Company has exercised two of the three land options related to the Superior plant received in the acquisition for approximately 140 acres of land and allocated $719,846 of the site development costs to this land as a cost to acquire the property.  The remaining $58,763 is recorded as an Other Assets and the Company does not believe it is impaired at this time. In addition, $10,100 of the cost associated with the exercised land option was allocated to the cost of the land.


12.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS


Rail Car Lease


On March 12, 2007, the Company executed a lease contract for 100 rail cars for a ten year period for $637 per month for the Shenandoah facility. It is anticipated that the Company will negotiate a similar lease agreement for rail cars for the Superior plant at some time in the future.  These rail cars will be utilized by the Company to ship Distillers Grains to customers.




21



Construction Agreements


On March 20, 2007, in connection with the execution of the Loan Agreements, and at the request of the lenders, Superior Ethanol, LLC entered into an amendment to the design-build agreement (the “Amendment”) between the Company and Agra Industries, Inc., the design-builder for the Superior Plant. The Amendment provides for various contract revisions, including, but not limited to, the following:

·

Delta T Corporation (the “Contractor”) will provide a performance warranty rather than the design-builder;

·

The construction agreement between design-builder and contractor was assigned from Agra Industries, Inc. to the Company (the “Assignment”);

·

Various contract amounts were revised in the Amendment as a result of the Assignment and to satisfy requirements of the lenders;

·

The Company entered into a Construction Management Agreement with Agra so that Agra will manage the Contractor’s services on the project;

·

The amount of the errors and omissions insurance policies were increased;

·

The work to be performed by various subcontractors was required to be bonded; and

·

The schedule of values was updated.


Superior Ethanol, LLC Loan Agreement


On October 16, 2006 the Company entered into a Commitment Letter for $51,600,000 with Farm Credit Services, FLCA.  The Commitment Letter was with Superior Ethanol, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Green Plains Renewable Energy, Inc. to provide partial funding for the construction of our second ethanol plant which is being built near Superior, Iowa (“Superior Plant”).


On March 21, 2007, Superior Ethanol, LLC entered into a Master Loan Agreement, Construction and Term Loan Supplement, Construction and Revolving Term Loan Supplement, Security Agreement and Real Estate Mortgage with Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (individually and collectively, the “Loan Agreements”). A participating interest under the Loan Documents was transferred to CoBank, ACB. This agreement required a $1,000 equity investment in both Farm Credit Services of America and CoBank. Under the Loan Agreements, the lenders will lend up to $50,000,000. The amount was lowered from the Commitment Letter based upon negotiations with the lenders. The loan proceeds are to partially finance construction of the Superior Plant and to provide funding for working capital purposes. This credit line is available after the required equity has been used for the construction of the Superior Plant.  The loan is comprised of a $40,000,000 amor tizing term loan and a $10,000,000 revolving term facility. Superior Ethanol, LLC paid loan origination fees of $422,000, $2,000 for equity in lenders and $73,410 for other debt issuance fees through the close the agreement. Superior Ethanol, LLC has not commenced drawing on this credit facility.




22



Loan Commitments and Repayment Terms


The Loan Agreements are comprised of a $40,000,000 amortizing term loan and a $10,000,000 revolving term facility.



·

Term Loan -The term loan is for $40,000,000. The term loan will be available for advances until December 31, 2007. Principal payments will commence with $1,375,000 due July 20, 2008, and then each quarter thereafter. In addition, any refund of sales tax paid in conjunction with construction of the Plant will be applied as an additional payment to the loan. Subject to adjustment in certain cases, final maturity of the term loan is July 20, 2015 at the latest.  In addition, for fiscal years ending in 2007 and ending with fiscal year 2010, we are also required to make a special payment equal to 75% of the available (if any) free cash flow from operations provided, however, that if such payments would result in a covenant default under the Loan Agreements, the amount of the payments shall be reduced to an amount which would not result in a covenant default. The free cash flow payments are discontinued wh en the aggregate total received from such payments exceeds $10,000,000.


·

Revolving loan - The revolving loan is for $10,000,000. The revolving loan will be available for advances and readvances throughout the life of the commitment. Semi-annual $2,500,000 payments on/step-downs of the commitment will commence on the first day of the month beginning approximately six months after repayment of the term loan, and by January 1, 2016 at the latest. The final maturity date is no later than July 1, 2017.


Pricing and fees


·

The loans will bear interest at either Agent Base Rate (prime) less 10 basis points to plus 25 basis points or short-term fixed rates at LIBOR (1, 3 or 6 month) +280 to +315 basis points based on fulfilling free cash flow payments and profitable operations.


·

The lenders may, however, allow the Company to elect to pay interest at a fixed interest rate to be determined


·

The Loan Agreements provides for a loan origination fee of $422,000. Origination fees of $185,000 and other fees of $69,910 have been incurred by the Company through February 28, 2007. Superior Ethanol, LLC paid loan origination fees of $237,000, $2,000 for equity in lenders and $3,500 for other debt issuance fees upon closing the Loan Agreements. Superior Ethanol, LLC has not commenced drawing on this credit facility. Additional appraisal, inspecting engineer, title Company insurance and disbursing fees are also at the Company’s expense.


·

There are annual administrative fees of $35,000 beginning November 1, 2007.


·

An unused commitment fee of ¾% on the $10,000,000 Revolving Term Loan will commence upon drawing on the loans.


Availability of Advances, Interest Rates and Fees


Advances are subject to satisfaction of specified lending conditions. Advances correlate to budget and construction timeline projections, with verification of progress by a third-party engineer.




23



Security


As security for the loans, the lenders received a first-position lien on all personal property and real estate owned by us and Superior Ethanol, our wholly owned subsidiary, including an assignment of all contracts and rights pertinent to construction and on-going operations of the Plants. The Company will be required to maintain certain financial and non-financial covenants during the term of the loans.



Representations, Warranties and Covenants


The loan agreements contain representations, warranties, conditions precedent, affirmative covenants (including financial covenants) and negative covenants.


·

The Loan Agreements require working capital (current assets over current liabilities in accordance with GAAP consistently applied) of not less than $4,500,000 at the earlier of commencement of operations or by December 31, 2007 and increasing to $5,000,000 at fiscal year endingeffective November 30, 2008, and there after,thereafter, except that in determining current assets, any amounts available under the Revolving Term Loan (less the amount that would be considered a current liability under GAAP if fully advanced) may be included.


·

The Loan Agreements requireMaintenance of net worth (total assets over total liabilities in accordance with GAAP consistently applied) of $43,500,000 million,$45,100,000, and increasing to $47,000,000$48,600,000 at fiscal year ending 2008 and thereafter.


·

The Loan Agreements requireMaintenance of Debt Service Coverage Ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.0 for fiscal year end 2008 and thereafter.  Debt Service Coverage Ratio is defined as (all as calculated for the most current year-end in accordance with GAAP consistently applied): 1) net income (after taxes), plus depreciation and amortization,; divided by 2) all current portions of regularly scheduled long term debt for the prior period (previous fiscal year end).


·

In addition,Restrictions on dividends or other distributions to stockholders will be limited toof no more than 40% of the profit, net of income taxes for each fiscal year and may be paidallowable only where we are expected to remain in compliance with all loan covenants, terms and conditions. Furthermore, with respect to the fiscal years ending in 2008 and thereafter, an additional distribution may be made to stockholders in excess of the 40% limit for such fiscal year if we have made the required free cash flow payment for/based onfor such fiscal year, and will thereafter remain in compliance with all loan covenants, terms and conditions on a pro forma basis net of said potential additional payment. ThereWe are currently in compliance with all covenants under the Superior Loan Agreement; however, there can be no assurance that we can remain in compliance with all covenants in the future.


Economic Development Loans and Grants

In April 2005, the Iowa Department of Economic Development (“IDED”) awarded us a High-Quality Job Creation (“HQJC”) financing incentive comprised of a $300,000 zero interest loan and a $100,000 forgivable loan (grant) for the Shenandoah project.  The IDED funds became available for our use in March, 2006 - upon closing of the senior debt financing commitment.  Associated with this award are job creation covenants.  We believe those covenants will be fulfilled shortly after the plants commence operations.  




13



Repayments are due on the $300,000 zero interest loan at $5,000 per month for sixty months beginning October 1, 2006. The $100,000 grant was recorded as long-term debt as the covenants related to jobs creation have not been fulfilled as of May 31, 2007.  If the initial requirements for job creation are met we will recognize the grant as income at that time.  


6.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION


The Green Plains Renewable Energy, Inc. 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (“Equity Incentive Plan”) provides for the granting of stock-based compensation, including options to purchase shares of common stock, stock appreciation rights tied to the value of common stock, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards to eligible employees, non-employee directors and consultants. We have reserved a total of 1.0 million shares of common stock for issuance under the plan. The maximum number of shares of common stock granted to any employee during any year is 50,000.

Grants under the Equity Incentive Plan may include:

Options- Stock options may be granted that are not exercisable until a fixed future date or in installments. Options issued to date are exercisable during their term regardless of termination of employment. The options issued to date may be exercised immediately and must be exercised no later than five years after the grant date.

Stock Awards- Stock awards may be granted to directors and key employees with ownership of the common stock vesting immediately or over a period determined by the Compensation Committee and stated in the award. Those granted to date vested immediately but were restricted as to sales for a specified period. Compensation expense was recognized upon the grant award. The stock awards are measured at fair value on the grant date, adjusted for estimated forfeitures.

Stock Compensation Election for Certain Officers and Directors– We have allowed certain officers and directors the option to receive a portion of their compensation for services in common stock.  The stock is priced at the closing price at the end of each quarter immediately prior to issuance.


We apply SFAS 123(R)“Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” for all compensation related to stock, options or warrants.  For all awards outstanding, we used a forfeiture rate of zero percent since we have no historical forfeiture experience under our share-based payment plans. We use original issuances of common stock to satisfy our share-based payment obligations.  Compensation cost expensed for our share-based payment plans described below was $2,827,684 and $2,829,337 for the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2007, respectively. The potential tax benefit realizable for the anticipated tax deductions of the exercise of share-based payment arrangements totaled $1,111,000 and $1,112,000 for the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2007, respectively.  However, due to uncertainty that the tax benefits will be realized, these potential benefits were not recognized currently.


Effective May 22, 2007, we granted options to purchase 325,000 shares of our common stock to our nine directors for services rendered.  These options are immediately exercisable for up to five years from the grant date at a price of $30.00 per share. The total fair value of the stock option grant was $2,462,615 which was expensed in the second quarter of 2007. The fair value of the grant was determined using the Black-Scholes model and was based on an assumed annual volatility (based on historical volatility experienced) of 48.8%, a dividend yield of 0%, a risk-free interest rate of 4.76% and an expected life of five years.  Since the option price exceeded the closing stock price the aggregate intrinsic value was zero at May 31, 2007.


Also, effective May 22, 2007, we granted 2,000 shares of our common stock to each of our nine directors (for a total of 18,000 shares) for services rendered.  We recorded $365,022 of expense for the value of the shares at the time of issuance, $20.28 per share, which was the closing price of our stock on May 22, 2007.  


Certain officers and directors have elected to receive a portion of their compensation for services since January 1, 2007, in unrestricted shares of common stock.  In July 2007, 12,887 shares will be distributed to these individuals valued at $189,787.  Accrued Liabilities at May 31, 2007, included compensation earned to that date of $124,917.



14




7.

EARNINGS PER SHARE


At May 31, 2007 we had outstanding warrants that are exercisable for 793,221 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $30 per share and warrants that are exercisable for 320,014 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $60 per share. The warrants were sold in our initial and secondary public offerings and the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants may be sold by non-affiliates without restriction.  The calculation of diluted earnings per share gives effect to common stock equivalents; however, potential common shares that may be issued upon exercise of all outstanding warrants were excluded for the 2007 periods since their effect would be antidilutive.  For the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2006, the dilutive effect of the warrants using the treasury stock method was 177,101 and 90,017 shares, respectively.


8.

INCOME TAXES


The pre-tax income for the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:


 

For the Three Months Ended

May 31,

For the Six Months Ended

May 31,

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2007

 

2006

Income (loss) before income taxes

$

(4,526,632)

$

110,037

$

(3,234,689)

$

121,865


The current and deferred components of income tax expense (benefit) for the three months ended May 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follow:



 

For the Three Months Ended

May 31,

For the Six Months Ended

May 31,

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2007

 

2006

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal    

$

238,100

$

37,400

$

(29,400)

$

41,400

State

 

70,100

 

11,000

 

20,900

 

12,200

Total current

 

308,200

 

48,400

 

(8,500)

 

53,600

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

(887,800)

 

(37,400)

 

(245,300)

 

(41,400)

State

 

(261,100)

 

(11,000)

 

(72,200)

 

(12,200)

Total deferred

 

(1,148,900)

 

(48,400)

 

(317,500)

 

(53,600)

Income tax expense (benefit)

$

(840,700)

$

-

$

(326,000)

$

-



Total income tax expense (benefit) differed from the amount computed by applying the U.S. Federal statutory rates of 34% for the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2007 and 2006 as follows:


 

For the Three Months Ended

May 31,

For the Six Months Ended

May 31,

 

 

2007

 

2006

 

2007

 

2006

Tax expense (benefit) at U.S. Federal statutory rate    

$

(1,539,000)

$

37,400

$

(1,099,700)

$

41,400

State tax expense (benefit), net of Federal tax effect

 

(242,400)

 

8,600

 

(174,700)

 

9,900

Impact of permanent items

 

500

 

2,400

 

1,100

 

3,500

Change in effective tax rate

 

-

 

-

 

(100)

 

-

Valuation adjustment

 

940,200

 

(48,400)

 

940,200

 

(54,800)

Other

 

-

 

-

 

7,200

 

-

Income tax expense (benefit)

$

(840,700)

$

-

$

(326,000)

$

-




15



Deferred tax assets and liabilities as of May 31, 2007 and November 30, 2006 are summarized as follows:



 

 

May 31,

2007

 

November 30,

2006

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

   Net operating loss carry-forwards

$

45,900

$

-

   Unrealized loss on derivatives

 

824,300

 

-

   Equity for Services

 

177,800

 

-

           Total current deferred tax assets

 

1,048,000

 

-

     

 

 

 

 

Non-Current:

 

 

 

 

Equity for services    

 

1,089,100

 

55,200

Other

 

7,200

 

-

           Total non-current deferred tax     assets

 

1,096,300

 

55,200

Gross deferred tax assets

 

2,144,300

 

55,200

Less: valuation allowance

 

(1,826,800)

 

-

Net deferred tax assets

 

317,500

 

55,200

   

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

Current:   

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments

 

-

 

13,000

Other temporary differences

 

-

 

3,400

Total current deferred tax liabilities

 

-

 

16,400

Non-Current:   

 

 

 

 

    Depreciation for tax in excess of book

 

67,100

 

-

Gross deferred tax liabilities

 

67,100

 

16,400

Less: valuation allowance

 

(67,100)

 

-

Net deferred tax liabilities

 

-

 

16,400

Deferred income taxes

$

317,500

$

38,800


During the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2007, we established a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and liabilities as we were in the development stage and full realization of future income tax benefits was uncertain. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible.  Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.


9.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


Plant Construction


Shenandoah –


On January 13, 2006, we entered into a design-build agreement with Fagen Inc.,  under which Fagen will provide all work and services in connection with the engineering, design, procurement, construction startup, performance tests, training for the operation and maintenance of the Shenandoah plant and provide all material, equipment, tools and labor necessary to complete the plant. As consideration for the services to be performed, Fagen will be paid $55,881,454, subject to future adjustments.  We are required to make payments to Fagen based upon monthly progress billings.  We paid $21,898,367 for the six months ended May 31, 2007 and $43,929,791 since work began on the contract. At May 31, 2007, we owed Fagen $6,544,299 for construction completed to-date including retainage and accruals.



16



If the plant is completed ahead of schedule, we are obligated to pay Fagen an early completion bonus that, under certain conditions, may be paid in installments.


We have entered into agreements with various other contractors related to construction at the Shenandoah site that are currently in progress. The contracts, as amended, total approximately $4,624,601 and as of May 31, 2007, we had paid $1,177,374 and owed the contractors $734,616 for construction completed to-date including retainages and accruals.


Superior –


In August 2006, Superior Ethanol entered into a design-build agreement with Agra Industries, Inc. under which Agra would provide all work and services in connection with the engineering, design, procurement, construction startup, performance tests, training for the operation and maintenance of the plant and provide all materials, equipment, tools and labor necessary to complete the Superior plant.  On March 20, 2007, in connection with the execution of the Superior Loan Agreements, and at the request of the lenders, Superior Ethanol entered into an amendment to the design-build agreement with Agra. As amended, Agra will be paid $75,953,276, subject to future adjustments, for services performed.  We are required to make payments to Agra based upon semi-monthly progress billings.  We paid $18,980,408 for the six months ended May 31, 2007 and $27,697,316 since work began on the contract. At May 31, 2007, we owed Agra $6,234,566 for construction completed to-date including retainage and accruals.


As amended, the Agra contract included an early completion bonus if substantial completion (as defined in the agreement) occurs in advance of January 19, 2008, provided that the facility meets 100% of the performance guarantees within ninety days following the actual date of substantial completion.  


We have entered into agreements with various other contractors related to construction at the Superior site. The contracts, as amended, total approximately $329,948 and as of May 31, 2007 we owed the contractors $179,948 for construction completed to-date including retainages and accruals.


Utilities


Shenandoah –


On October 27, 2006, we entered into a capacity agreement with Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America, to provide capacity on their natural gas pipeline for the Shenandoah facility.  We deposited $90,000 with Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America to secure our performance under the agreement.


On October 27, 2006, we entered into an agreement with MidAmerican Energy Company to install a primary electric distribution system for the Shenandoah facility.  We will pay an “excess facilities” tariff of 1.75% of the installed cost on a monthly basis for approximately 5 years.

Superior –


In January 2007, Superior Ethanol entered into a Service Extension Agreement with Iowa DepartmentLakes Electric Cooperative for the installation of Transportation-electrical distribution facilities at the Superior plant. In 2006 Superior Ethanol deposited $350,000 of the expected project cost of $700,000 with Iowa Lakes.   Superior also entered into a ten-year electric service agreement with Iowa Lakes effective November 1, 2007.


On March 2, 2007, we entered into a firm throughput service agreement with Northern Natural Gas Company, to provide capacity on their natural gas pipeline for the Superior facility.  We are obligated to deposit $2,400,000 to secure our performance under the agreement.  Deposits through May 31, 2007, totaled $913,172.




17



Sales and Marketing


We have entered into exclusive agreements with Renewable Products Marketing Group, LLC (“RPMG”) for the sale of all ethanol produced at both the Shenandoah and Superior plants. The agreements are for one year commencing on the first day ethanol is shipped from the respective plants.  After the one year commitment, if the agreements are not renewed, certain rail car leases entered into by RPMG will be assigned to us and Superior Ethanol.  We would be required to assume the rail car lease related to the Shenandoah plant of approximately $100,000 per month for the remainder of an original seven year lease term. Superior Ethanol would be required to assume the rail car lease of approximately $105,000 per month for the remainder of an original ten year lease term.


We have entered into exclusive agreements with Commodity Specialists Company (“CSC”) for the sale of all the DDGS, wet distillers’ grains and solubles produced at both the Shenandoah and Superior plants. These agreements are for one year commencing on the first day of production at each of the plants.


In March, 2007, the Iowa Department of Transportation (IDOT), Modal Division issued the Company an award specificallywe executed a lease contract for 100 rail cars for a ten year period for $68,700 per month for the constructionShenandoah facility. It is anticipated that we will negotiate a similar lease agreement for rail cars for the Superior plant at some time in the future.  These rail cars will be utilized by us to ship distillers’ grains to customers.


Commodities - Corn


As of new spur trackMay 31, 2007 we had entered into future delivery contracts for approximately 4.2 million bushels valued at approximately $17,146,000.  In addition, we held futures contracts on corn totaling 0.8 million bushels valued at approximately $(11,950).


12.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS


Essex Elevator Acquisition


On June 1, 2007, we entered into an agreement to purchase Essex Elevator, Inc. in Essex, Iowa for $1.5 million in cash and assumption of liabilities. The agreement is subject to completion of due diligence by the installationparties and may be terminated at any time prior to closing if a party is dissatisfied with the results of four turnoutssuch due diligence.  If due diligence is satisfactory to serve the ethanol facilityparties, we anticipate closing on the agreement in Shenandoah, IA.the third quarter of this year. The funding sourceelevator is a combined Loan/Grant award consisting of a Railroad Revolving Loan of $154,000 or 7.9%located approximately five miles to the northeast of the project costs (whichever is less)Shenandoah plant on the same rail line we will use to transport products from our plant.


Stock Issued for Services


Certain officers and $126,000 Grant or 5.9%directors have elected to receive a portion of the project costs (whichever is less). Total project costs are estimatedtheir compensation for services since January 1, 2007, in unrestricted shares of common stock.  In July 2007, 12,887 shares will be distributed to be $2.1 million.these individuals valued at $189,787.  Accrued Liabilities at May 31, 2007, included compensation earned to that date of $124,917.





2418




Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationOperations


The following discussion and analysis provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our condensed consolidated financial condition and results of operations. The discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual events or results may differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements. The discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed financial statements and accompanying notes included herewith, our Annual Report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2006, the consolidated financial statements included therewith and notes to the consolidated financial statements thereto and the risk factors contained therein.


Overview


We are a start-uplater stage development company in the later stages of development which was formed for the purpose of building plants to produceconstruct and operate dry mill, fuel grade ethanol and animal feed products (the “Plants”).plants. Construction of the Company’sour first Plantplant, located in Shenandoah, Iowa, began in April, 2006 in Shenandoah, Iowa.2006.  In August 2006, construction began on a second plant, similar to the Shenandoah facility, in Superior, Iowa. We do not expect to operate at a profit before our first ethanol Plant is completely constructed and operational.


The Company’s PlantsTo facilitate future growth our plants have been designed and planned for ease of future expansion. Such expansion may be a growth consideration as we go forward. We also plan to continue to seek out and explore other growth opportunities and strategies that could add income potentialincluding acquiring existing and shareholder value to GPRE.developing new ethanol plants and related facilities.  In the shortnear term, however, we intend to continue to focus the majority of our efforts on the completion and start-up of the two Plants that we presently haveplants under construction.


For the three monthsand six month periods ended February 28,May 31, 2007, and 2006, we had net losses of $(3,685,932) and $(2,908,689), respectively, compared to net income of $777,243$110,037 and $11,828$121,865, respectively during the comparable periods for the prior year.  Non-cash compensation costs expensed for our share-based payment plans was $2,827,684 and $2,829,337 for the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2007, respectively. We have an accumulated earningsdeficit of $1,247,615$(2,438,318) from inception at June 29, 2004 (Inception) through February 28,May 31, 2007.


We had other income of $2,145,444 and $135,639 for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively.  This income was primarily from interest on our cash and derivative financial instruments related to corn futures and options.  Our operating expenses were $853,501 and $123,811 for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These expenses are primarily general and administrative costs related to our employees, facilities, travel and professional fees for consulting, board fees, accounting, legal, IT systems, website and exchange fees.


We believe we will incur significant losses from this time forward until we complete the construction of our Plantsplants in Shenandoah and Superior and commence operations at these locations. We have options to purchase land in other areas in Iowa, where we may construct additional ethanol plants in the future. However, we may decide to expand production at one of our two Plantsplants under construction, prior to building at other sites.  Further, at this time no assurance can be given that we will be able to build at any of the sites where we have options, or that we will be successful in our efforts to complete construction or commence operations at the two ethanol Plantsplants we are currently building in Shenandoah and Superior, Iowa. Even if we successfully meet all of these objectives and begin operations of the two ethanol Plantsplants under construction, no assurance can be given we will be able to operate the Plantsplants profitably.




25



ShenandoahPlant


We raised gross proceedsOur Shenandoah plant under construction is a name-plate 50 million gallon per year (“mmgy”) plant. Name-plate means the plant is designed by the design builders and the process technology providers to produce at least the stated quantity of $34,459,900, in our initial public offeringethanol per year once it becomes operational. The Shenandoah plant is being built by Fagen, Inc.  ICM, Inc. is the process technology provider for that closed in November 2005. The net proceeds after fees and costs were $34,203,242.plant. We expect that the Shenandoah projectplant, including related working capital, will cost approximately $84.7$85.3 million. We raised approximately $673,300 in seed capital prior to commencing our public offering. We entered into loan arrangements whereby Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA and other participating lenders have agreed to loan us up to $47,000,000 to use for construction costs and working capital. In addition, we were awarded grants and zero-interest loans of $400,000 from the Iowa Department of Economic Development, and took in approximately $2,049,000 from the issuance of our common shares to certain shareholders that exercised their warrants received in the IPO. We have also generated approximately $1,400,000 of interest on the IPO offering funds and warrant proceeds, and have realized gains from our derivative financial instruments of ap proximately $1,456,000. Therefore, we believe we have the necessary funding to complete construction of


At name-plate capacity the Shenandoah Plant and have adequate working capitalplant is expected to, operate the plant.


Representatives from Fagen Inc., our contractor in Shenandoah, have informed the Company that the 50 million gallon per year Plant we are building in Shenandoah will consume on an annual basis, consume approximately 18 million bushels of locally grown corn and annually produce approximately 50 million gallons of fuel-grade, denatured ethanol, and approximately 160,000 tons of DDGS on a dry basis.animal feed known as distillers dried grains with solubles (“DDGS”). We have hired RPMG of Belle Plaine, MN,contracted with Renewable Products Marketing Group, LLC, (“RPMG”), an independent broker, to sell the ethanol produced at the Shenandoah plant and have contracted with Commodity Specialists of Minneapolis, MNCompany (“CSC”) to sell the DDGS produced at the Shenandoah plant. Our third party marketing agents will coordinate all sales, marketing, and shipping of our anticipated products.  We believe there are over 200 hundred thousand cattle in feed lots within a 50 mile radius of the Plantplant in Shenandoah. WeAs a result, we believe we canmay sell a portion of our distillers’ grains in a wet form, because of this, which may save us money because we will not need to dry the grain before selling it.reduce our processing costs.




19



Additionally, in discussions with representatives from Fagen we have been informedbelieve that at capacity the Shenandoah Plantplant will produce approximately 148 thousand148,000 tons of carbon dioxide that may be recovered on an annual basis.annually. At this time, we intend to first scrub and vent the CO² and then vent it offcarbon dioxide because we believe the CO² market in Iowa is overly saturated and do not believe it would be profitable or prudent to install capturing facilities at our Plants.facilities.


The Shenandoah Plant lies adjacent to a spur line of the BNSF Railway Company (BNSF). The spur (the “SPUR”) was closed in 2005We have been advised by BNSF.  On January 26, 2006, we entered into an Allowance Contract (the “Allowance Agreement”) with BNSF which included our agreement with BNSF to renovate and maintain approximately 20 miles of track on the SPUR.  Upon signing the Allowance Agreement, we paid $3.5 million to BNSF for the SPUR renovation and BNSF commenced the renovation work soon thereafter.  On September 27, 2006 we were informed by BNSFFagan that the renovation work had been completed.  BNSF will own, operate and maintain the SPUR, as long as GPRE meets certain annual volume thresholds (cars placed on the rail) as outlined in the Allowance Agreement. We are entitled to receive refund payments from BNSF to reimburse us for this expense, but only to the extent that our usage of the line meets the annual volume thresholds. There can be no assurance that our usage will meet the annual volume thresholds or that we will be reimbursed for all or any part of the renovation costs. If BNSF were to sell the line to a third party (short-line), we would be entitled to repayment by BNSF.  In the future, if there is any additional, major, renovation needed to be done to the SPUR, it shall be GPRE’s responsibility to pay for any such additional, major, renovation. The Allowance Agreement is for a term expiring on September 14, 2015. We intend to purchase approximately 3.5 miles of the spur from BNSF that we are currently leasing, that is deemed “Industrial Track” that we anticipate will allow us to load out unit trains of ethanol and distillers grains in the future.


A great deal of the construction at the Shenandoah plant is progressing with the first grind scheduled to commence in late-August, 2007.  In early June nearly all of the approximately 35 employees needed to operate the plant began working for us.  Employees will complete several weeks of safety and plant operational training prior to commencement of operations at the Shenandoah plant.  The training activities include experience at a fully operational ethanol plant under the direction of ICM’s training staff.  ICM and Fagen have committed to assist us during initial plant operation to assure our employees are properly trained to safely and efficiently operate the Shenandoah plant.


The following table describes our projected sources and uses of funds for the Shenandoah facility. The total projected sources are estimated to be approximately $85.3 million, including $781,000 of interest earned, derivative gains and other, net of surplus funds applied to the Superior plant.  We estimate the cost of the Shenandoah plant to be approximately $85.3 million, which includes $7.5 million in working capital. We believe we have sufficient funds to complete the Shenandoah plant.  However, the actual use of funds is based upon contingencies, such as the estimated cost of construction of the plant and related facilities construction, the cost of debt financing, pre-production period costs and working capital costs.  Working capital costs include inventory costs which may vary significantly based on market prices for corn, ethanol, and DDGS. The following figures are intended to be estimates only and the actual use of funds may vary significantl y from the descriptions given below.


 Sources and Uses of Funds

   

 

Estimated Sources of Funds:

 

 

Net Common Stock and Warrant Proceeds

$

37,119,000

Economic Development Loan and Grant

 

400,000

Interest Earned, Derivative Gains and Other, Net

 

781,000

Term and Revolving Debt Financing

 

47,000,000

Total Estimated Sources of Funds

$

85,300,000

   

 

 

Estimated Uses of Funds:

 

 

Plant Construction

$

60,456,000

Site Costs

 

5,968,000

Railroad Costs

 

4,900,000

Fire Protection/Water Supply Costs

 

3,960,000

Rolling Stock Costs

 

240,000

Financing Costs and Capitalized Interest

 

1,476,000

Pre-Production Period Costs

 

800,000

Working Capital and Other Costs

 

7,500,000

Total Estimated Uses of Funds

$

85,300,000


If Fagen completes the Shenandoah plant early, we will have to pay Fagen an early completion bonus that under certain conditions may be paid in installments.


Superior Plant


On February 22, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding ownership interest in Superior Ethanol, L.L.C.  Superior Ethanol had options to acquire land and had completed a feasibility study relating to the construction of an ethanol plant on this site, zoned as “heavy industrial.”  The site has been completed andawarded a 15-year property tax abatement from Dickinson County, Iowa.  Our Superior plant is a name-plate 50 mmgy plant.  The Superior plant is being built by Agra Industries, Inc. with Delta T Corporation as the project is proceeding in a timely manner. The cement grain elevators attechnology provider.  We expect that the Plant have been constructed. Dryers have been mounted on their foundations, molecular sieves and evaporators have been put n place, the distillers’ grain building has been erected, the fermentation tanks and the beer well have been completed. The administration building is also being constructed and nearing completion. Pictures of the site and the progress being made can be viewed on our website.Superior plant, including related working capital, will cost $105.1 million




2620



At capacity the Superior plant is expected to, on an annual basis, consume approximately 18 million bushels of corn and produce approximately 50 mmgy of fuel-grade denatured ethanol and approximately 160,000 tons of DDGS.  We entered into an agreementhave contracted with RPMG, of Belle Plaine, MN in February 2006an independent broker, to sell ourthe ethanol production from the Shenandoah plant. We have also entered into an agreementand with Commodity Specialists of Minneapolis, MNCSC to sell our animal feed products from the Shenandoah plant. We have hired and will be hiring additional staff for the direct operation of the Plant, and currently expect to employ approximately 35 peopleDDGS produced at the ShenandoahSuperior plant. We do not intend to hire a sales staff to market our products. Our third party marketing agents will coordinate all sales, marketing, and shipping of our anticipated products.


The following table describes our proposed useAdditionally, the plant is expected to produce approximately 148,000 tons of proceeds, based upon our current cash reservescarbon dioxide carbon dioxide. At this time, we intend to scrub and loan arrangements forvent the Shenandoah facility. The total projected sources are estimatedcarbon dioxide because we do not believe it would be profitable to be approximately $84.7 million.  We estimate the cost of the Shenandoah Plant to be approximately $84.7 million, which includes $7.5 million in working capital. We believe we have sufficient funds to complete the project in Shenandoah. The projected use of funds is based on the estimated cost of Plant construction, the regulatory permits required and the cost of debt financing and inventory costs, which are market driven. Therefore, the following figures are intended to be estimates only and the actual use of funds may vary significantly from the descriptions given below. However, we anticipate that any variation in our use of proceeds will occur in the level of proceeds attributable to a particular use (as set forth below) rather than a change from one of the uses set for th below to a use not identified in this report.


Projected Sources and Uses of Funds

   

 

Estimated Sources of Funds:

 

 

Share/Warrant Proceeds (less fees plus interest)

$

36,627,000

Zero Interest Loan and Grant from State of Iowa

 

400,000

Seed Capital

 

673,000

Term Debt Financing

 

47,000,000

Total Estimated Sources of Funds

$

84,700,000

   

 

 

Estimated Uses of Funds:

 

 

Estimated Plant Construction

$

59,875,000

Estimated Site Costs

 

5,968,000

Estimated Railroad Costs

 

5,295,000

Estimated Fire Protection/Water Supply Costs

 

3,546,000

Estimated Rolling Stock Costs

 

240,000

Estimated Financing Costs and Capitalized Interest

 

1,476,000

Estimated Pre-Production Period Costs

 

800,000

Estimated Inventory & Working Capital Costs

 

7,500,000

Total Estimated Uses of Funds

$

84,700,000


The City of Shenandoah awarded us a 15 year property tax abatement. It is anticipated that it will result in significant long-term savings.




27



Superior Plant


On February 22, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding ownership interest in Superior Ethanol, LLC. Superior had options to acquire at least 159 acres of property in Dickinson County, Iowa, had completed a feasibility study relating to the construction of an ethanol plant on this site, the site is zoned as “heavy industrial,” the site has been awarded a property tax abatement from Dickinson County, Iowa, and Superior Ethanol had approximately $210,000 in cash at closing. In consideration for the acquisition of Superior as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, we issued 100,000 shares of our restricted common stock to Brian Peterson, a director of the Company. Prior to the acquisition, substantially all of Superior was owned by Mr. Peterson. The stock was issued prior to the commencement of trading on the NASDAQ Capital Market. We have since used the $210,000 that was in the accounts of Superior, LLC to pay for developmental work done in preparation fo r building the Plant in Superior and for feasibility work at other sites where we have options to purchase land and where we may build other plants in the future. As part of these expenditures, Superior Ethanol, LLC acquired on April 13, 2006 a land option for 125 acres for a rail loop for the site. During the three months ending February 28, 2007, we exercised options to purchase approximately 215 acres for the Superior plant.


After the acquisition, operational plans continued to progress on the Superior ethanol Plant project with the builder, the rail engineers, and the utility consultants. The location of the Plant at the site was determined, and an application for an air permit was filed with the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) on April 19, 2006. The application was approved on June 13, 2006.install capturing facilities.


We raised gross proceeds of approximately $48.0 million ($46.8 million net offering costs) in a second public offering, which closed on July 31, 2006 foranticipate the construction of the Superior Plant. On October 16, 2006, we received a Commitment Letter from CoBank and Farm Credit Services to lend us up to $51.6 million to complete the Superior Plant project. On March 21, 2007, Superior Ethanol, LLC, entered into a Master Loan Agreement, Construction and Term Loan Supplement, Construction and Revolving Term Loan Supplement, Security Agreement and Real Estate Mortgage with Farm Credit Services of America FLCA (individually and collectively, the “Loan Agreements”). A participating interest under the Loan Documents was transferred to CoBank, ACB. This agreement required a $1,000 investment in both Farm Credit Services of America and CoBank. Under the Loan Agreements, the lenders will lend up to $50,000,000. The amount was lowered from the Commitment Letter based upon negotiations with the lenders. The loan proceeds are to partially finance construction of the Superior Plant and to provide funding for working capital purposes. This credit line is available after the required equity has been used for the construction of the Superior Plant. The loan is comprised of a $40,000,000 amortizing term loan and a $10,000,000 revolving term facility. Superior Ethanol, LLC paid loan origination fees of $422,000, $2,000 for equity in lenders and $73,410 for other debt issuance fees through the close of the agreement. Superior Ethanol, LLC has not commenced drawing on this credit facility.


In August 2006 we entered into a Design-Build contract with Agra Industries (“Agra”) of Merrill, Wisconsin to build the plant and construction on the plant began that same month.  Delta T will be the technology provider in Superior. The completion date is projected to be 15 months from the start of the plant which was in August 2006. However, we have renegotiated various parts of our contract with Agra. Due to this, we have allowed them an extension of approximately 45 days on the completion date. Therefore, we believe the plant will be completed sometime near the end of December of this year, orearly in the month of January, 2008, rather than November 2007, as the original contract stipulated. It is anticipated that this project will require approximately $97.6 million including $7.2 million for working capital. The projected cost for this plant is higher than the plant being built in Shenandoah due to sharp increases in the costs of raw materials such as steel and cement.


The Superior plant will consume on an annual basis approximately 18 million bushels of locally grown corn and annually produce approximately 50 million gallons of ethanol (52.5 million gallons of fuel-grade denatured ethanol) and approximately 160,000 tons of DDGS on a dry basis.  Additionally, the Plant in Superior will produce approximately 148 thousand tons of carbon dioxide CO2.2008.


We are currently interviewing individuals to fill management positions at the Superior plant. Once these positions have been filled, we will be hiring staff for the direct operation of the Superior plant, andplant. We currently expect to employ approximately 35 people at this Plant. We do not intend to hire a sales staff to market our products. We have entered into agreements with RPMG and Commodity Specialists to sell our ethanol and distillers grains at the Superior plant.  It is anticipated that these third-party marketing agents will coordinate the sales of our products as well as coordinate all shipping at the Superior plant.




28



The following table describes our proposed useprojected sources and uses of proceeds based upon our current cash reserves and proposed loan arrangements for the Superior facility. The total projected sources are estimated to be $97.6 million.$105.1 million, including $6,817,000 of interest earned, derivative gains and other, net.  The interest earned, derivative gains and other, net includes surplus funds from the Shenandoah plant. We anticipate that the cost of the Superior project will be approximately $97.6$105.1 million, which includes $7.2$8.8 million in working capital.  Our latest estimate was increased primarily to account for increased steel costs, additional water treatment facilities required and credit support related to natural gas service to the plant.  We believe we have sufficient funds available to complete the construction and commence operation of the Superior plant.  However the actual use of funds is based upon contingencies, such as the estimated cost of construction of the Plant’splant and related facilities construction, the regulatory permits requiredcost o f debt financing, pre-production period costs and working capital costs.  Working capital costs include inventory costs which aremay vary significantly based on market driven.prices for corn.  Therefore, the following figures are intended to be estimates only and the actual use of funds may vary significantly from the descriptions given below depending on the contingencies described above. However, we anticipate that any variation in our use of proceeds will occur in the level of proceeds attributable to a particular use (as set forth below) rather than a change from one of the uses set forth below to a use not identified in this report.


Projected Sources and Uses of Funds

Estimated Sources of Funds:

 

 

Common Share Proceeds and Interest on Proceeds

$

47,600,000

Term and Revolving Debt Financing

 

50,000,000

Total Estimated Sources of Funds

$

97,600,000

   

 

 

Estimated Uses of Funds:

 

 

Estimated Plant Construction

$

71,671,186

Estimated Site Costs

 

4,940,000

Estimated Railroad Costs

 

6,610,000

Estimated Fire Protection/Water Supply Costs

 

1,963,000

Estimated Rolling Stock Costs

 

350,000

Estimated Financing Costs and Capitalized Interest

 

1,650,500

Estimated Pre-Production Period Costs

 

800,000

Estimated Inventory, Working Capital, Other Costs

 

9,615,314

Total Estimated Uses of Funds

$

97,600,000


Dickinson County awarded us a 15 year property tax abatement; 100% for the first 12 years and 50% for the remaining three years. It is anticipated that this award will result in significant long-term savings to the Company.


Plan for the Next 24 Months of Operations


We expect to spend the next 24 months in the design-development and construction of the two Plants we presently have under construction, and thereafter anticipate that we will commence production of ethanol and distillers grains at these Plants upon completion. We expect to have sufficient cash on hand and debt financing to cover all costs associated with the construction of these projects, including but not limited to, utilities, construction, equipment acquisition and the working capital needed to commence operations at these Plants. We received a Commitment Letter for debt funding from Farm Credit Services of America and CoBank during the last quarter of 2006, and closed on a credit facility for the Superior project on March 21, 2007


In addition, we expect to have enough cash to cover our costs through this period, including staffing, office costs, audit, legal, compliance and staff training. We estimate that we will need approximately $84.7 million to complete the Shenandoah project, which includes $7.5 million in working capital. At present, we believe we have sufficient funds to complete the Shenandoah project and hope to complete the project as per our current projected budget.  If Fagen completes that Plant early, we will have to pay Fagen an early completion bonus. If this were to happen, we could expend any extra cash we may have on hand by paying the early completion bonus. However, our contract with Fagen stipulates that under certain conditions, payment of any early completion bonus can be converted to a note and paid in installments.

Estimated Sources of Funds:

 

 

Net Common Stock Proceeds

$

48,317,000

Interest Earned, Derivative Gains and Other, Net

 

6,817,000

Term and Revolving Debt Financing

 

50,000,000

Total Estimated Sources of Funds

$

105,134,000

   

 

 

Estimated Uses of Funds:

 

 

Plant Construction

$

80,128,000

Site Costs

 

4,820,000

Railroad Costs

 

6,250,000

Fire Protection/Water Supply Costs

 

2,986,000

Rolling Stock Costs

 

350,000

Financing Costs and Capitalized Interest

 

1,800,000

Pre-Production Period Costs

 

800,000

Working Capital and Other Costs

 

8,000,000

Total Estimated Uses of Funds

$

105,134,000


The tables in the Overview section above including the estimated sources of funds and various costs associated with the projects in Shenandoah and Superior also describe operations for the next 24 months. These tables are only estimates and actual expensesexpenditures could be higher or lower due to a variety of factors described in “Item 1 A - Risk Factors” of our annual reportAnnual Report filed on Form 10-K on February 13, 2007.for the year ended November 30, 2006.




2921



Near-term Business Plans


In the near-term, we expect to focus on the successful completion of construction of the Shenandoah and Superior plants, and thereafter anticipate that we will commence production of ethanol and distillers grains. We are also developing, along with our third-party marketing agents, the plant builders and technology providers, the commercial and administrative processes necessary for ethanol production including corn procurement, inventory accounting, and ethanol and DDGS marketing.  



On June 1, 2007, we entered into an agreement to purchase Essex Elevator, Inc. in Essex, Iowa for $1.5 million in cash and assumption of liabilities. The agreement is subject to completion of due diligence by the parties and may be terminated at any time prior to closing if a party is dissatisfied with the results of such due diligence.  If due diligence is satisfactory to the parties, we anticipate closing on the agreement in the third quarter of this year. The elevator is located approximately five miles to the northeast of the Shenandoah plant on the same rail line we will use to transport products from our plant. We believe that owning additional grain storage located near the Shenandoah plant will allow us greater flexibility in the procurement of corn and will expand our corn purchasing area.


We are also exploring other possible opportunities, that have presented themselves to us, including opportunities of mergers and acquisitions involving other ethanol producers and anticipate that other opportunities may occur within the renewable fuels industry, due to the significant number of projects that are in various stages of development. We do not anticipate that all of the development stage projects will come to fruition. Opportunities could arise because of this that we may be able to take advantage of. We are also looking at opportunities having to do with other technologies, as well as opportunities that may exist in other regions of the Americas. We believe ethanol anddevelopers, other renewable fuels are not only going to have a significant place within the United States’ energy consumption in the coming years, but also within the world’s consumption of energy.


Operating Expenses


We currently have operating expenses, such as salaries for our Executive Officersrelated technologies and other administrative staff. We are currently in the process of hiring additional staff for the Shenandoah Plant as we are drawing closer to completion. We will have additional operating expenses for other staff as they are hired. Along with such operating expenses, we anticipate that we will have significant expenses related to financinggrain and interest. We have allocated funds in our capital structure for these expenses. However, there can be no assurance that the funds allocated are sufficient to cover the expenses. We may need additional funding to cover these costs if costs are higher than expected.fuel logistics facilities.  


Results of Operations


We are a later stage development Company.company. Our fiscal year ends on November 30th30. For the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2007, we had net losses of each$(3,685,932) and $(2,908,689), respectively, compared to net income of $110,037 and $121,865, respectively during the comparable periods for the prior year.


We have had no revenues from operations since inception in 2004,June 2004; however, for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006 we have had other income primarily from interest earned on the funds raised in our various common stock offerings and the realized and unrealized profits we have madegains and losses from our derivative financial instruments purchased as part of our hedging activities during the later part of 2006 and the first quarter of 2007. We recorded interest income of $456,918, and $135,639 for the three months ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively.  Our gains on derivative financial instruments were $1,688,526 for the three months ended February 28, 2007.


We expect interest income to decline as we use the proceeds from our offerings to fund the building of the Plants.  Further, there can be no assurance given that the Company will have future profits on our hedgingrisk management activities. The price of corn rose dramatically in the September, 2006 to February, 2007 period resulting in the profits on the corn futures and options.  The Company is using futures and options to assure we will have an adequate supply of corn to commence operations at the Shenandoah Plant prior to the new harvest. However, we do not expect the price of corn to continue to rise at the same rate that occurred during the period discussed. Inversely, the price of corn could also decrease and we could incur losses on our positions.  


Our operating expenses were $853,501$3,547,209 and $123,811$4,400,710 for the three monthsand six month periods ended FebruaryMay 31, 2007, respectively.  For the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2006, our operating expenses were $455,089 and $578,900, respectively.  Our operating expenses are primarily general and administrative expenses for employee salaries, incentives and benefits,benefits; professional fess includingfor accounting, legal, consulting, and investor relations,relations; and board fees and site development fees for consultants for obtaining regulatory permits, plant design, rail design, feasibility studies and other services prior to starting, and during construction.fees.


The increase in operating expenses for the three monthsand six month periods ending February 28,May 31, 2007 compared to the same periodperiods of 2006 was primarily due to: (1)to an increase in board fees of $2,827,637 as a $451,226 increase inresult of non-cash stock based compensation granted under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan.  Effective May 22, 2007 we granted all board members shares of stock and stock options.    In addition, employee salaries, incentives and benefits relatedincreased $273,132 and $724,358 for the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2007, due primarily to increasing from three employees in Q1 2006 to nine in Q12007, (2) a $136,266an increase in professional feesthe number of employees over the prior period.     


We recorded interest income of $350,442, and $807,360 for the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2007, respectively.  This compares to $565,126 and $700,765, for comparable periods in 2006.  Interest income has declined in 2007 compared to 2006 as we have used the Company utilized consultantsproceeds from our equity offerings to fund the construction of our plants.  


Our gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments were $(1,284,472), and $404,054 for accounting, legal, investor relations, exchange feesthe three and board fees (3)six month periods ended May 31, 2007, respectively.  We utilize derivatives, such as futures and options, to manage price risks for corn expected to be consumed in operations at both the remaining increaseShenandoah and Superior plants. We have also contracted for fixed-price, future physical delivery of $142,198 was primarily duecorn with various producers. We intend to increases in generalcontinue, and administrativemay expand, the use of various derivatives and forward contracts to manage price and supply risks for insurance, travel and facilities.corn inputs at our plants.  




3022



Since inceptionOur ethanol marketer has forward sold quantities of ethanol expected to be produced at our plants during the next 12 months.  We have also contracted for the purchase of denaturant for the Shenandoah plant in anticipation of the commencement of operations. We are also presently in the process of negotiating purchases of natural gas, enzymes, and other needed chemicals to operate the plant, and anticipate that we will have engaged consultants for professional services work.  Priorsufficient quantities of these materials in place or under contract prior to the commencement of operations at the construction of our two Plants, our expenses were primarily the result of our efforts to identify viable sites for ethanol plants.  We expended amounts of capital on other potential sites.  We incurred feasibility costs, such as drilling test wells for water availability, plant layout, track design etc. We have also incurred and paid consulting costs with and to PlanScape Partners of Minnesota who the Company engaged to help us develop other sites which we were considering as possible sites to build additional plants.  We used the funds from the Superior Ethanol, LLL acquisition and a nominal amount of additional funds that we received from the exercise of warrants to pay for those costs.Shenandoah plant.


To date, our risk management transactions have not met the specific requirements for hedge accounting treatment under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and as a result changes in market values are recognized in our operations currently. We expect our operating expensesintend to increase as we add personnelevaluate the possibility of qualification of future risk management transactions under hedge accounting treatment.  See “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and other administrative costs to support our Plant operationsAnalysis of Financial Condition and administrative needs. We expect these increases in expenses and declines in other income will lead to losses in future periods.Results of Operation – Critical Accounting Policies.”  


As a result of the operating expenses and other income discussed above our incomeloss before income taxes was $1,291,943$(4,526,632) and $11,828$(3,234,689) for the three monthsand six month periods ended February 28,May 31, 2007, and 2006, respectively.  Our provision for income taxestax expense (benefit) was $514,700$(840,700) and $(326,000) for first quarter of fiscal 2007.the three and six month periods ended May 31, 2007, respectively. We did not record ana full income tax expensebenefit for the 2007 periods and the comparable periods in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 due to loss carry-forwards.  Net income was $777,243 and $11,828 for the first quarter ended February 28, 2007 and 2006, respectively.See Note 8 in “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” included herein.


Liquidity and Capital Resources


On February 28,May 31, 2007 we had $32,381,047$19,300,481 in cash and equivalents. Allequivalents and $74,276,763 available under committed loan agreements (subject to satisfaction of specified lending conditions). We anticipate utilizing substantially all of these funds for completion of the funds we have raised have been invested in short-term US Government backed money market fundsconstruction of our plants, and securities. We anticipate that ourassociated working capital requirements for the next twenty-four months will be as described above.requirements.  We believe that we have secured sufficient funding to complete construction and begin operatingoperations of both of our ethanol plants.  The acquisition of Essex Elevator and the Plants we currently have under construction.related working capital that may be associated with acquiring and storing significant quantities of corn is expected to require additional financing.  We may or may not decide to secure these funds prior to closing the acquisition.  In the immediate future we intend to focus the majority of our time and efforts on getting the two Plants we have under construction completed and operational. If the high costs of construction were to come down from current levels, and if our share price were to appreciate from current levels, we may decide at that time to move forward withimprove or preserve our expansion plans. When,liquidity through the issuance of common stock in exchange for materials and if, market conditions improve,services.  In the future we may raisealso sell additional equity to buildor borrow additional plants oramounts to expand the onesplants we are presently constructing through public o r private offerings of our securities and/or by borrowingto build additional funds. If we decided to do this, thereplants.  We can beprovide no assurance given that we will be able to acquire the funding necessary for these additional projects at reasonable terms, orif at all.


In furtherance of our business plan, onShenandoah Loan Agreement

On February 6, 2006, we entered into a Master Loan Agreement, Construction and Term Loan Supplement, Construction and Revolving Term Loan Supplement, Security Agreement and Real Estate Mortgage with Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (individually and collectively, the “Loan Agreements”“Shenandoah Loan Agreement”). A participating interest under the Shenandoah Loan DocumentsAgreement was transferred to CoBank, ACB. Under the Shenandoah Loan Agreements,Agreement, the lenders will loan up to $47,000,000. The loan proceeds are$47,000,000 to partially finance construction of the Shenandoah Plant and to provide funding for working capital purposes.  The Plant is to be in production by no later than May 1, 2007 (our lenders have agreed to work with us on this date as well as other requirements if needed, and at this time, we anticipate that production will not commence in May, but rather approximately 70 to 90 days later) and construction costs are not to exceed an aggregate of $71,000,000, net of refu ndable sales taxes.  In December of 2006, we complied with all conditions precedent and began drawing on the credit line for construction of the Plantplant in Shenandoah after first, as required under the Shenandoah Loan Agreement, spending the equity we had committed to build the Shenandoah Plant, which was a requirement before we could begin drawing on the credit facilities. The Company believes that it has secured sufficient funding to complete construction of both its Superior and Shenandoah ethanol Plants.




31



On March 21, 2007, Superior Ethanol, LLC, the wholly subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Master Loan Agreement, Construction and Term Loan Supplement, Construction and Revolving Term Loan Supplement, Security Agreement and Real Estate Mortgage with Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (individually and collectively, the “Loan Agreements”). A participating interest under the Loan Documents was transferred to CoBank, ACB. This agreement required a $1,000 equity investment in both Farm Credit Services of America and CoBank. Under the Loan Agreements, the lenders will lend up to $50,000,000. The amount was lowered from the Commitment Letter based upon negotiations with the bank.plant. The loan proceeds are to partially finance construction of the Superior Plant and to provide funding for working capital purposes. This credit line is available after the required equity has been used for the construction of the Superior Plant.  The loan is comprised of a $40,000,000 amortizing term loan and a $10,000,000 revolving term facility. Superior Ethanol, LLC paid loan origination fees of $422,000, $2,000 for equity in lenders and $73,410 for other debt issuance fees upon the close of the agreement. Superior Ethanol, LLC has not commenced drawing on this credit facility


Loan Commitments and Repayment Terms


Shenandoah- The Shenandoah Loan Agreements are comprised of a $30,000,000 amortizing term loan and a $17,000,000 revolving term facility.


·The Shenandoah Loan Agreement was amended effective May 31, 2007, to reflect the current construction costs and schedule for the Shenandoah plant, to modify certain covenants and repayment requirements, and to reflect changes that had been agreed to as a result of our acquisition of Superior Ethanol.  The following summarizes the significant terms of the Shenandoah Loan Agreement as amended.




23



Loan Commitments and Repayment Terms –


·

Term Loan – This loan is available for advances until JulyDecember 1, 2007.  Principal payments are to commence thereafter with $1,200,000 due NovemberMay 20, 2007,2008, and each quarter thereafter with a final maturity on Novemberor before May 20, 2013 at the latest.2014. In addition, for each fiscal years ending in 2007 and thereafter,year, we are also required to make a special paymentpayments equal to 65% of the available (if any) free cash flow from operations, not to exceed $2,000,000 per year, provided, however, that if such payments would result in a covenant default under the Shenandoah Loan Agreements,Agreement, the amount of the payments shall be reduced to an amount which would not result in a covenant default. The free cash flow payments are discontinued when the aggregate total received from such payments exceeds $8,000,000.


·

Revolving Term – This loan is available for advances throughout the life of the commitment. ThisAllowable advances under this loan requires semi-annualare reduced by $2,400,000 payments on/step-downs of the commitment to commenceeach six month period commencing on the first day of the month beginning approximately six months after repayment of the term loan, by Maybut in no event later than November 1, 2014, atwith the latest with a final maturity no later than November 1, 2017.


Superior - The Superior Loan Agreements are comprised of a $40,000,000 amortizing term loan and a $10,000,000 revolving term facility.


·

Term Loan – The term loan is for $40,000,000. The term loan will be available for advances until December 31, 2007. Principal payments will commence with $1,375,000 due July 20, 2008, and then each quarter thereafter. In addition, any refund of sales tax paid in conjunction with construction of the Plant will be applied as an additional payment to the loan. Subject to adjustment in certain cases, final maturity of the term loan is July 20, 2015 at the latest.  In addition, for fiscal years ending in 2007 and ending with fiscal year 2010, we are also required to make a special payment equal to 75% of the available (if any) free cash flow from operations, provided, however, that if such payments would result in a covenant default under the Loan Agreements, the amount of the payments shall be reduced to an amount which would not result in a covenant default. The free cash flow payments are discontinued when the aggregate total received from such payments exceeds $10,000,000.


·

Revolving Term – The revolving loan is for $10,000,000. The revolving loan will be available for advances and readvances throughout the life of the commitment. Semi-annual $2,500,000 payments on/step-downs of the commitment will commence on the first day of the month beginning approximately six months after repayment of the term loan, and by January 1, 2016 at the latest. The final maturity date is no later than July 1, 2017.





32



Pricing and fees


Shenandoah –


·

The Loan Agreementloans will bear interest at either the Agent Base Rate (prime) plus 0%-1/2% (based on a ratio of total equity0.00% to total assets)0.50% or short-term fixed rates at LIBOR (1, 3 or 6 month) +285plus 2.85% to +335 basis points (based3.35% (each based on a ratio of total equity to total assets).


·

The lendersWe may, however, allow the Company to elect to pay interest at a fixed interest rate to be determined.determined by the Lenders.


·

OriginationWe have incurred origination fees of $352,500, $2,000 for equity in lenders of $2,000 and other fees in the amount of $106,260 have been incurred by the Company$117,060 through February 28,May 31, 2007.  Appraisal, inspecting engineer, and title Company insurance and disbursing fees are also at the Company’sour expense.


·

There are annual administrative fees of $25,000 beginning November 20, 2006.


·

An unused commitment fee of ½%0.50% on the $17,000,000 Revolving Term Loan began on February 1, 2007.



Superior –


·

The loans will bear interest at either Agent Base Rate (prime) less 10 basis points to plus 25 basis points or short-term fixed rates at LIBOR (1, 3 or 6 month) +280 to +315 basis points based on fulfilling free cash flow payments and profitable operations.


·

The lenders may, however, allow the Company to elect to pay interest at a fixed interest rate to be determined


·

The Loan Agreement provides for a loan origination fee of $422,000. Origination fees of $185,000 and other fees of $69,910 have been incurred by the Company through February 28, 2007. Superior Ethanol, LLC paid loan origination fees of $237,000, $2,000 for equity in lenders and $3,500 for other debt issuance fees upon closing the Loan Agreement. Superior Ethanol, LLC has not commenced drawing on this credit facility. Additional appraisal, inspecting engineer, and title Company insurance and disbursing fees are also at the Company’s expense.


·

There are annual administrative fees of $35,000 beginning November 1, 2007.


·

An unused commitment fee of ¾% on the $17,000,000 Revolving Term Loan An unused commitment fee of ¾% on the $17,000,000 Revolving Term Loan that will commence upon drawing on the loans.



Availability of Advances, Interest Rates and Fees


Advances are subject to satisfaction of specified lending conditions. Advances correlate to budget and construction timeline projections, with verification of progress by a third-party engineer.





33



Security


As security for the loans, the lenders received a first-position lien on all personal property and real estate owned by us and Superior Ethanol, LLC, the wholly owned subsidiary,we own, including an assignment of all contracts and rights pertinent to construction and on-going operations of the Plants. The Company will be required to maintain certain financial and non-financial covenants during the term of the loans.plant.  


Representations, Warranties andSummary of Loan Covenants


The Shenandoah Loan Agreements contain representations, warranties, conditions precedent,Agreement contains affirmative covenants (including financial covenants) and negative covenants.


Shenandoah –covenants including:


·

The Loan Agreements requireMaintenance of working capital (current assets over current liabilities in accordance with GAAP consistently applied) of not less than $5,000,000 at the earlier of commencement of operations or by MayOctober 31, 2007 and increasing to $6,000,000 at fiscal year ending 2007,effective May 31, 2008, and there after,thereafter, except that in determining current assets, any amounts available under the Revolving Term Loan (less the amount that would be considered a current liability under GAAP if fully advanced) may be included.  




24



·

The Loan Agreements requireMaintenance of net worth (total assets over total liabilities in accordance with GAAP consistently applied) of $31,000,000 million,$34,000,000, increasing to $32,000,000 at fiscal year ending 2007,$35,500,000 effective May 31, 2008, and increasing to $34,000,000$37,500,000 at fiscal year ending 2008 and thereafter.  


·

The Loan Agreements requireMaintenance of Debt Service Coverage Ratio of not less than 1.5 to 1.0 for fiscal year end 20072008 and thereafter.  Debt Service Coverage Ratio is defined as (all as calculated for the most current year-end in accordance with GAAP consistently applied): 1) net income (after taxes), plus depreciation and amortization,; divided by 2) all current portions of regularly scheduled long term debt for the prior period (previous fiscal year end). In addition,


·

Restrictions on dividends or other distributions to stockholders will be limited toof no more than 40% of the profit, net of income taxes for each fiscal year, and may be paidallowable only where we are expected to remain in compliance with all loan covenants, terms and conditions. Furthermore, with respect to the fiscal years ending in 2008 and thereafter, an additional distribution may be made to stockholders in excess of the 40% limit for such fiscal year if we have made the required free cash flow payment for/based onfor such fiscal year, and will thereafter remain in compliance with all loan covenants, terms and conditions on a pro forma basis net of saidsuch potential additional payment. ThereWe are currently in compliance with all covenants under the Shenandoah Loan Agreement; however, there can be no assurance that we can remain in compliance with all covenants in the future.


Superior Loan Agreement


On March 21, 2007, Superior Ethanol entered into a Master Loan Agreement, Construction and Term Loan Supplement, Construction and Revolving Term Loan Supplement, Security Agreement and Real Estate Mortgage with Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (individually and collectively, the “Superior Loan Agreement”). A participating interest under the Superior Loan Agreement was transferred to CoBank, ACB.  Under the Superior Loan Agreement, the lenders will lend up to $50,000,000 to partially finance construction of the Superior plant and to provide funding for working capital purposes. This credit line is available after the required equity has been used for the construction of the Superior plant.  The loan covenants.is comprised of a $40,000,000 amortizing term loan and a $10,000,000 revolving term facility. Superior Ethanol paid loan origination fees of $422,000, $2,000 for equity in lenders and $73,410 for other debt issuance fees upon the closing of the agree ment. Superior Ethanol has not commenced drawing on this credit facility. The following summarizes the significant terms of the Superior Loan Agreement.


Loan Commitments and Repayment Terms –


·

Term Loan – This loan is available for advances until December 31, 2007.  Principal payments are to commence thereafter with $1,375,000 due July 20, 2008, and each quarter thereafter with a final maturity on or before July 20, 2015. In addition, for each fiscal year, we are also required to make special payments equal to 75% of the available (if any) free cash flow from operations, provided, however, that if such payments would result in a covenant default under the Superior Loan Agreement, the amount of the payments shall be reduced to an amount which would not result in a covenant default. The free cash flow payments are discontinued when the aggregate total received from such payments exceeds $10,000,000.


·

Revolving Term – This loan is available for advances throughout the life of the commitment. Allowable advances under this loan are reduced by $2,500,000 each six month period commencing on the first day of the month beginning approximately six months after repayment of the term loan, but in no event later than July 1, 2015, with the final maturity no later than July 1, 2017.




3425



SuperiorPricing and fees


·

The loans will bear interest at either Agent Base Rate (prime) minus 0.15% to plus 0.25% or short-term fixed rates at LIBOR (1, 3 or 6 month) 2.80% to 3.15% (each depending on whether the operations for the preceding fiscal year were profitable or unprofitable).


·

We may, however, elect to pay interest at a fixed interest rate determined by the Lenders.


·

We have incurred origination fees of $422,000, equity in lenders of $2,000 and other fees in the amount of $73,410 through May 31, 2007.  Appraisal, inspecting engineer, title insurance and disbursing fees are at our expense.


·

There are annual administrative fees of $35,000 beginning November 1, 2007.


·

An unused commitment fee of 0.75% on the $10,000,000 Revolving Term Loan Agreements requirebegan on March 15, 2007.


Availability of Advances, Interest Rates and Fees –


Advances are subject to satisfaction of specified lending conditions. Advances correlate to budget and construction timeline projections, with verification of progress by a third-party engineer.


Security –


As security for the loans, the lenders received a first-position lien on all personal property and real estate owned by Superior Ethanol, including an assignment of all contracts and rights pertinent to construction and on-going operations of the plant.  


Summary of Loan Covenants –


The Superior Loan Agreement contains affirmative covenants (including financial covenants) and negative covenants including:


·

Maintenance of working capital (current assets over current liabilities in accordance with GAAP consistently applied) of not less than $4,500,000 at the earlier of commencement of operations or by December 31, 2007 and increasing to $5,000,000 at fiscal year endingeffective November 30, 2008, and there after,thereafter, except that in determining current assets, any amounts available under the Revolving Term Loan (less the amount that would be considered a current liability under GAAP if fully advanced) may be included.


·

The Loan Agreements requireMaintenance of net worth (total assets over total liabilities in accordance with GAAP consistently applied) of $43,500,000 million,$45,100,000, and increasing to $47,000,000$48,600,000 at fiscal year ending 2008 and thereafter.


·

The Loan Agreements requiresMaintenance of Debt Service Coverage Ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.0 for fiscal year end 2008 and thereafter.  Debt Service Coverage Ratio is defined as (all as calculated for the most current year-end in accordance with GAAP consistently applied): 1) net income (after taxes), plus depreciation and amortization,; divided by 2) all current portions of regularly scheduled long term debt for the prior period (previous fiscal year end).




26



·

In addition,Restrictions on dividends or other distributions to stockholders will be limited toof no more than 40% of the profit, net of income taxes for each fiscal year and may be paidallowable only where we are expected to remain in compliance with all loan covenants, terms and conditions. Furthermore, with respect to the fiscal years ending in 2008 and thereafter, an additional distribution may be made to stockholders in excess of the 40% limit for such fiscal year if we have made the required free cash flow payment for/based onfor such fiscal year, and will thereafter remain in compliance with all loan covenants, terms and conditions on a pro forma basis net of said potential additional payment. ThereWe are currently in compliance with all covenants under the Superior Loan Agreement; however, there can be no assurance that we can remain in compliance with all loan covenants


At February 28, 2007 in the Company had drawn $10,462,197 on the Shenandoah Loan Agreement. The Company intends to repay theses commitments with profits generated from the Shenandoah and Superior plants that are being constructed with the funds.  The Company or Management can make no assurances that future profits will be sufficient to repay these credit facilities.future.


Government Programs and Grants


In April 2005, the Iowa Department of Economic Development (IDED)(“IDED”) awarded the Companyus a High-Quality Job Creation (HQJC)(“HQJC”) financing incentive comprised of a $300,000 zero interestzero-interest loan and a $100,000 forgivable loan (grant) for the Shenandoah project.  TheThese IDED funds became available for use by the Companyus in March, 2006 - upon closing of the senior debt financing commitment.  Associated with this award are job creation and maintenance covenants.  The Company believesWe believe those covenants will be fulfilled.  TheIn addition, the Shenandoah project hasand Superior projects have been awarded a tax incentive packagepackages from the Iowa Department of Economic Development under their High Quality Job Creation (HQJC) program with, accordingHQJC program.  The incentive packages include investment income tax credits up to 5% of qualifying expenditures, refunds of certain sales and use taxes paid, and property tax exemptions for all or a portion of the IDED, an estimated value of approximately $3.5 million.


The Superior project has been awardedcertain improvements.  To fully qualify for these benefits, we are req uired, among other things, to create and maintain for a tax incentive package fromminimum period of time jobs with set levels of compensation and certain minimum benefits in conjunction with the Iowa Departmentproduction of Economic Development under their High Quality Job Creation (HQJC) program with, according tovalue added agricultural products.  If we meet the IDED, an estimated valuerequirements of approximately $4.7 million.the awards we will recognize the financial benefits of the programs in future periods.


The Iowa Department of Transportation (IDOT)(“IDOT”), Modal Division has issued an award specifically for the construction of new spur track and the installation of four turnouts to serve the ethanol facility in Shenandoah IA.plant.  The funding source is a combined Loan/Grant award consistingconsists of a Railroad Revolving Loan of $154,000 or 7.9% of the eligible project costs (whichever is less) and a grant of $126,000 Grant or 5.9% of the eligible project costs (whichever is less). Total eligible project costs are estimated to be $2.1 million.  Advances under the loan/grant are expected to occur after completion of the project.




35



The CompanyWe and Superior Ethanol LLC have each entered into a preliminary agreement with Iowa Western Community College for anPreliminary Industrial New Jobs Training Agreement throughwith two Iowa community colleges for reimbursement of training costs we incur.  Under the 260E Programagreements the colleges will reimburse us for up to approximately $175,000.$355,000 in training costs.  The 260E Programprogram is designed to assist new businesses in the state of Iowa with costs associated with educating and training new employees.  The 260E program funds are generated through the sale of training certificates, i.e. bonds, underwritten and sold by agents of the Community College Economic Development Group. The costs of the bonds (i.e. interest payments) are covered by the Iowa Withholding Taxrepaid with funds submitted by the Companyus for theIowa income tax withholding related to payroll on the new jobs created.  In the event Iowa income tax withholding related to payroll on the new jobs created is insufficient to repay the bonds, we are obligated to pay any shortfall that may exist.


We believe that we may be eligible for and anticipate applying for other state and federal grant, loan and forgivable loan programs. Most grants that may be awarded to us are considered paid-in capital for tax purposes and are not taxable income. Although we may apply under several programs simultaneously and may be awarded grants or other benefits from more than one program, it must be noted that some combinations of programs are mutually exclusive. Under some state and federal programs, awards are not made to applicants in cases where construction on the project has started prior to the award date. There is no guarantee that applications will result in awards of grants or loans. With the exception of the $300,000 zero interest loans and the $100,000 forgivable loans (grants) described above, we are not depending on the award of any such grants as part of our funding of the Projects. However, we may be eligible to receive such grants. If we do, the amount of money w e will have to borrow may be reduced by that amount. There can be no assurance that we will receive any funding under any federal or state funding initiative.

27



Contractual Obligations


Our contractual obligations as of February 28,May 31, 2007 were as follows:


 

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period

Contractual Obligations

 


Total

 

Less Than 1 Year

 


1-3 Years

 


3-5 Years

 


There-after

 


Total

 

Less Than 1 Year

 


1-3 Years

 


3-5 Years

 


There-after

Long-Term Debt Obligations(1)

$

10,737,197

$

2,460,000

$

8,182,197

$

95,000

 

-

$

22,983,237

$

1,260,000

$

7,380,000

$

7,220,000

$

7,123,237

Capital Lease Obligations

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Operating Lease Obligations (2)

 

104,192

 

55,096

 

49,096

 

-

 

-

 

8,333,993

 

881,902

 

2,505,691

 

2,473,200

 

2,473,200

Purchase Obligations (3)

 

80,785,258

 

80,785,258

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

106,073,178

 

82,482,222

 

7,909,606

 

7,776,000

 

7,776,000

Other Long-Term Liabilities

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

-

Total

$

91,626,647

$

83,300,354

$

8,231,293

$

95,000

 

-

$

137,390,408

$

84,624,124

$

17,735,297

$

17,529,200

$

17,372,437


(1)

Includes current portion of long-term debt. Excludes the $100,000 from Iowa Department of Economic development recordedDevelopment expected to be recognized as a non-refundable grant.

(2)

These   Operating lease costs are for ourrail cars and office space inspace.

(3)   Includes construction agreements and purchase orders with Fagan, Agra and various other contractors for construction of the Shenandoah and Las Vegas.

(3)

Includes the agreements with Kelly-Hill Company of approximately $319,800Superior plants.  Also includes estimated minimum contractual obligations for industrial track rehabilitation, Sunderman, Inc. of approximately $73,000 for the administrative building in Shenandoah, McCormick Construction Company, of approximately $24,300, City of Shenandoah  of approximately $989,700 for wastewater project, ECS of $75,000 for project managementRPMG and Fagen, Inc. of approximately $18,152,000 for construction at the site in Shenandoah, Iowa, Agra Industries, Inc. of approximately $61,061,300 for the Superior Plant and ECS of $90,000 for construction management at Superior. Included in this amount are approximately $4,687,200 and $4,069,600 of retainage for work that has been completed or estimated to be completed.forward corn purchase contracts.


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates


Property and equipment


Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation.  Depreciation is provided principallyprimarily on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets which are currently 3-7 years.




36



Land and permanent land improvements are capitalized at cost.  Non-permanent land improvements, construction in progress and capitalized interest incurred during construction are capitalized and depreciated upon the commencement of operations of the property.  The moneyAmounts withheld from contractors on work performed for land improvements and construction in progress are included in these accountscapitalized as incurred and offset byalso reflected as a current liability for accrued retainage.


The cost of repairs and maintenance is charged to expense as incurred.  Expenditures for property betterments and renewals are capitalized. Upon sale or other disposition of a depreciable asset, cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in operating income or loss.


The CompanyWe periodically evaluatesevaluate whether events and circumstances have occurred that may warrant revision of the estimated useful life of fixed assets or whether the remaining balance of fixed assets should be evaluated for possible impairment. The Company usesWe use an estimate of the related undiscounted cash flows over the remaining life of the fixed assets in measuring their recoverability.


The determination for permanent land improvements and non-permanent land improvements is based upon a review of the work performed by Management and if the preparation activities would be destroyed by putting the property to a different use, the costs are not considered inextricably associated with the land and are depreciable.  This determination will have an impact on future results because permanent land improvements are not depreciated where non-permanent improvements will be depreciated.




28



Recoverable rail line costs


The Company has entered into a contract with Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) that requires the Company to payOur initial expenditures for any major rail line renovation costs for therelated to a railroad spur track running from Red Oak, Iowa to the Shenandoah Plant.  Includedowned by BNSF Railway are included in the contract is a provision for reimbursement to the Company for the renovation costs up to $3,500,000 through rebates ($50 to $150) issued per rail car load - provided sufficient rail cars are placedOther Assets on the rail line.   The rebatesCondensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  Transportation cost reductions allowed by BNSF will be recorded as a reduction to the track renovation costs and included in cost of goods sold until the full amount has been recovered.  If the track is sold by BNSF, the agreement provides for repayment to the Companyus for any portion of the unrecovered renovation costs.


 We review this asset for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.  Currently, Management believes the Companywe believe we will fully recover the $3,500,000rail line renovation costs and therefore hashave not made anyrecorded a valuation allowancesallowance for this asset.  A future determination that a portion or all of these costs are not recoverable may have a material impact on our future operating results.


Impairment of long-lived assets


Our long-lived assets consisted of property and equipment and acquired intangible assets.  We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.  Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset.  If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds itits estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.  Significant Managementmanagement judgment is required in determining the fair value of our long-lived assets to measure impairment, including projections of future discounted cash flows.


Derivative financial instruments


DerivativesWe follow Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”in accounting for our risk management activities.  Under SFAS No. 133 derivatives such as exchange-traded futures contracts are currently recognized on the balance sheet at fair value.  At the present time and until operations commence all realized and the Company is generating a revenue stream from the production of ethanol, anyunrealized gains and all fair value adjustments forlosses on derivative financial instruments will beare recorded in the statement of operations as gains/(losses) in Other Income.  Upon the commencement of operations, for the productionall realized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments will be considered a component of ethanol,cost of goods sold.  Unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments found to be highly effective hedges with theirfor underlying commodity willpurchases and sales may be designated as cash flow hedges and recorded in “Other Comprehensive Income” net of tax.




37



The Company intends to implement FASB No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”which will have an impact on the timing of gains and losses for effective hedges. For ineffective hedges, gains and losses will continue to be recorded in Other Income until the Company begins operations. After operations commence, hedgingunrealized gains and losses will be considered a component of cost of goods sold.  Until operations commence, gainsGains and losses on hedgesderivatives not recorded in “Other Comprehensive Income” may have a material impact on operating results due to market volatility.


Use of estimates


The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of AmericaGAAP requires Managementmanagement to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.


The Company usesWe use a days approach (estimated billing dollars divided by the number of days), unless other information is available, to estimate the liability for construction work from the billing cut-off to the end of the accounting period.  These amounts can represent material estimates by the Company.us.  These accruals do not currently affect our operating results but may have a material impact on our reported assets and liabilities.


Stock based compensation  


The Company appliesWe apply SFAS No. 123 123(R) “Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationCompensation” for all compensation related to stock, options or warrants. SFAS 123No. 123(R) requires the recognition of compensation cost using a fair value based method whereby compensation costs is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. The Company willWe use the Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate the fair value of options and warrants issued to both employees and non-employees. Stock issued for compensation is valued using the market price of the stock on the date of the related agreement.


The Company has granted no warrants or options for compensation from inception through the period ended February 28, 2007. However, we anticipate that we will do so in the future as part of our anticipated Equity Incentive Plan.  The implementation of any Equity Incentive Plan may have a material impact on our future operating results.

29


The Company granted the former president and CEO 150,000 shares valued at the original issuance price of $.25 per share for a total of $37,500 for services and this issuance is recorded in fiscal year ending November 30, 2004.  The Company issued 5,000 shares in November, 2005 valued at the IPO price of $10.00 per share to a director for services and this is issuance is recorded in fiscal year ending November 2005.  The Company issued 5,000 shares in January, 2006 valued at the IPO price of $10.00 per share to an engineering firm for services and issued 2,500 shares valued at the fair market price of $37.30 to an organization as a charitable contribution and theses issuances were recorded in fiscal year ending November 30, 2006. In February 2007, the Company granted three clerical employees 25 shares each valued at the then current market value of $22.04.



Realizability of Deferred Tax AssetsAccounting for Income Taxes


Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method in accordance with SFAS No. 109“Accounting for Income Taxes.”   Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amount of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.  The assessment of the realizability ofeffect on deferred tax assets involvesand liabilities of a high degree of judgment and complexity.  In assessingchange in tax rates is recognized in operations in the realizability of deferred tax assets, Management considers whetherperiod that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowances is recorded if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The realization of deferred tax assets is dependent uponup on the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences as determined pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” become deductible.




38



Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Management’s evaluation of the realizability of deferred tax assets must consider positive and negative evidence, and the weight given to the potential effects of such positive and negative evidence is based on the extent to which it can be objectively verified. Prior to the 2006 fiscal year, we had incurred losses, therefore, we recorded no tax asset for these losses as there was no evidence the Company would produce a gain in future years.  During the 2006 fiscal year and the current fiscal year, the Company generated realized and unrealized gains to offset operating losses and management believes based on the industry there is a high degree of evidence the Company will produce income in the future sufficient to realize the current deferred tax assets as of February 28, 2007.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements


We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements


The following accounting pronouncements were adopted (with the exception of SAFSSFAS No. 157) in157 and SFAS No. 159) and became effective at the beginning of the fiscal year ending November 30, 2006 and became effective in the three months ending February 28, 2007.


In June 2006, the FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “AccountingAccounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”(“FIN 48”). FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes by prescribing a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, and disclosure. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company does not believe the adoption of FIN 48 willdid not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,“Fair Value Measurements.”SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 requires companies to disclose the fair value of their financial instruments according to a fair value hierarchy as defined in the standard. Additionally, companies are required to provide enhanced disclosure regarding financial instruments, in one of the categories (level 3), including a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances separately for each major category of assets and liabilities. SFAS No.157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company doesWe do not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers’Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans.���SFAS No. 158 requires the recognition of the funded status of a defined benefit plan in the balance sheet; the recognition in other comprehensive income of gains or losses and prior service costs or credits arising during the period but which are not included as components of periodic benefit cost; the measurement of defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the balance sheet date; and disclosure of additional information about the effects on periodic benefit cost for the following fiscal year arising from delayed recognition in the current period. In addition, SFAS No. 158 amends SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” and SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for Post Retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions,” to include guidance regard ing selection of assumed discount rates for use in measuring the benefit obligation. SFAS No. 158 is effective for our year ending December 31, 2006.November 30, 2007. The Company does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 158 willdid not have a material impact on the Company’sour consolidated financial statementsstatements.




30



In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, “ConsideringConsidering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements”(“SAB 108”). Due to diversity in practice among registrants, SAB 108 expresses SEC staff views regarding the process by which misstatements in financial statements are evaluated for purposes of determining whether financial statement restatement is necessary. SAB 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006. The Company does not believe the adoption of SAB 108 willdid not have a material impact on the Company’sour consolidated financial statements.




39



New Accounting Pronouncements


In February, 2007 the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASSFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities—including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.Liabilities.”  This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions.  This statement is expected to expand the use of fair market value measurement, which is consistent with long-term measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. This statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company doesWe do not expect the adoption of this statement to be significant to the Company’sour consolidated financial statements.


Forward-Looking Statements


Throughout this report, we make “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements include the words “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,” “believe,” “expect” or “anticipate” and other similar words. These forward-looking statements generally relate to our plans and objectives for future operations and are based upon Management’s reasonable estimates of future results or trends. Although we believe that our plans and objectives reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we may not achieve such plans or objectives. Actual results may differ from projected results due, but not limited, to unforeseen developments, including developments relating to the following:


• The availability and adequacy of our cash flow to meet our requirements, including payment of loans;


• Economic, competitive, demographic, business and other conditions in our local and regional markets;


• Changes or developments in laws, regulations or taxes in the ethanol, agricultural or energy industries;


Changes in commodity prices for corn, ethanol, natural gas, distillers’ grains and electricity;


Actions taken or omitted to be taken by third parties including our suppliers and competitors, as well as legislative, regulatory, judicial and other governmental authorities;


• Competition in the ethanol industry;


• The loss of any license or permit;


Transportation costs for our products and inputs;


The loss of our Plantsplants due to casualty, weather, mechanical failure or any extended or extraordinary maintenance or inspection that may be required;


• Changes in our business strategy, capital improvements or development plans;


• The availability of additional capital to support capital improvements and development; and,


• Other factors discussed under “Risk Factors” in our annual report on Form 10-K and as contained herein.



31



You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. The forward looking statements specified in this report have been compiled as of the date of this report and should be evaluated with consideration of any changes occurring after the date of this report. We will not update forward-looking statements even though our situation may change in the future and we assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.



40




Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


We are a start-up company in the later stages of development, which was formed for the purpose of building fuel-grade ethanol Plants to produce ethanol and animal feed products.  Our first Plant is currently being constructed in Shenandoah, Iowa, along with a second Plant in Superior, Iowa. Although we are not presently conducting operations as an ethanol producer, we are presently subject to market risks, concerning our long-term debt, future prices of corn, natural gas, ethanol and DDGS.  From time to time we may purchase corn futures and options we have purchased as ato hedge on a portion of the corn we anticipate we will need once the Shenandoah facility begins production, sometime in mid-2007, as well as 2.1 million bushels of corn thatproduction.  In addition, we have contracted for future physical delivery of corn in anticipation of the commencement of operations in Shenandoah.operations. This is explained more fully below.  If and when we begin Plantplant operations, we will be exposed to the full impact of market fluctuations associated with interest rates and commodity prices as discussed below. At this time, we do not expect to have exposure to foreign currency risk as all of our business is expected to be conducted in U.S. dollars.


Interest Rate Risk


We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. Exposure to interest rate risk results primarily from holding term loans and revolving loans which bear variable interest rates. Specifically we have $10,462,197$22,723,237 outstanding in variable rate, long term debt as of February 28,May 31, 2007. The specifics of each note are discussed in greater detail in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources.


Commodity Price Risk


We expect to produce ethanol and its co-product, distiller's dried grains with solubles (DDGS),DDGS from corn and our business will be sensitive to changes in the priceprices of corn.each of these commodities. The price of corn is subject to fluctuations due to unpredictable factors such as weather, total corn planted and harvested acreage, changes in national and global supply and demand, and government programs and policies. We also expect to use natural gas in the ethanol and DDGS production process, and our business will be sensitive to changes in the price of natural gas. The price of natural gas is influenced by such weather factors as extreme heat or cold in the summer and winter, in addition to the threat of hurricanes in the spring, summer and fall. Other natural gas price factors include the U.S. domestic onshoreNorth American exploration and offshore rig countproduction and the amount of U.S. natural gas in underground storage during both the injection and withdrawal seasons.  Ethanol prices are sensitive to world crude-oil supply and demand, crude-oil refining capacity and utilizati on, government regulation and consumer demand for alternative fuels.  DDGS prices are sensitive to various demand factors, such as cattle on feed and prices for feed alternatives, and supply factors, primarily production by ethanol plants and other sources.


We anticipate that we will attempt to reduce the market risk associated with fluctuations in the price of corn and natural gas by employing a variety of risk management and hedging strategies. Strategies include the use of derivative financial instruments such as futures and options initiatedexecuted on the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT)(“CBOT”) and/or the New York Mercantile Exchange, (NYMEX), as well as the daily cash management of our totalphysical corn and natural gas ownershipprocurement relative to monthly demandplant requirements for each commodity, whichcommodity.  The management of our physical corn procurement may incorporate the use of forward cashfixed-price contracts orand basis contracts.




32



A sensitivity analysis has been prepared to estimate our exposure to ethanol, corn, DDGS and natural gas price risk.  Market risk related to these factors is estimated as the potential change in pre-tax income resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse changechanges in the fair valueprices of our expected corn and natural gas requirements and average ethanol price as of February 28, 2007.  The volumes are based on our expected use and sale of these commoditiesDDGS output for a one year period from February 28,May 31, 2007.  AsThis analysis excludes the impact of February 28, 2007 approximately 10%risk management activities that result from our use of our estimated corn usage over the next 12 months was subject to fixed price contracts.fixed-price purchase and sale contracts and derivatives. The results of this analysis, which may differ from actual results, are as follows:




 

Estimated Volume
Requirements for the next
12 months (net of forward
and futures contracts)

 

Unit of Measure

 

Hypothetical
Adverse Change in
Price as of
02/28/2007

 

Approximate
Adverse Change to
Income

 

 

Estimated Total Volume
Requirements for the next
12 months 

 

Unit of Measure

 

Approximate
Adverse Change to
Income

Natural Gas

 

  1,281,855

 

MMBTU

 

10%

 

$

935,754

 

Ethanol

 

37,701,613

 

Gallons

 

10%

 

$

8,520,565

 

 

57,026,000

 

Gallons

 

$

 12,489,000

Corn

 

13,464,862

 

Bushels

 

10%

 

$

5,584,383

 

 

20,366,000

 

Bushels

 

$

 8,102,000

DDGS

 

188,000

 

Tons

 

$

 1,694,000

Natural Gas

 

1,920,000

 

MMBTU

 

$

 1,523,000


At February 28,May 31, 2007, approximately 20% of our estimated corn usage for the Company had 100 July 2007 and 400 December 2007 CBOT Corn Futuresnext 12 months was subject to fixed-price contracts.  This included fixed-price future-delivery contracts (“the Position”) to assure corn supply at the initiation of Plant operations in 2007 with a fair value of $1,593,613.for approximately 4.1 million bushels.  In addition, we held CBOT futures contracts on corn totaling 0.8 million bushels.  As a result of these positions, the Company heldeffect of a net short corn option position of 200 contracts with an expiration of December 2007 with a net fair value of $267,500. In addition, the Company had a net margin account balance of $423,363 with brokers for Futures Initial Margin.  Our total net derivative financial instruments were $2,284,476 with a Position (net of margin) of $1,861,113. A 10% adverse move in the market valueprice of corn shown above would be reduced by approximately $2,433,000.

At May 31, 2007, approximately 5% of our forecasted ethanol production during the Position wouldnext 12 months has been sold by our ethanol marketer under fixed-price contracts.  As a result in an approximate pre-tax loss of $1,062,000.  Athese positions, the effect of a 10% adverse move in the market valueprice of our net options positionethanol shown above would result in an approximate pre-tax lossbe reduced by approximately $600,000.  As of $78,000.


At February 28,May 31, 2007, the Companywe had not entered into fixed priceany fixed-price sales contracts for corn for a total of approximately 2.1 million bushels. The Company has also taken positions in corn futures and options as a hedge to secure more of the corn we anticipate we will need for operations.DDGS or natural gas.


Item 4. Controls and Procedures


The Company hasWe have evaluated, with the participation of the Company’sour Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’sour disclosure controls and procedures as of February 28,May 31, 2007, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15.  Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’sour disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There have been no significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly effect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation.


We are also developing, along with our third-party marketing agents, the plant builders and technology providers, the commercial and administrative processes necessary for ethanol production including corn procurement, inventory accounting, and ethanol and DDGS marketing.  In conjunction with this activity we are developing internal controls over these processes.  As a result, we expect to have material changes in our internal controls over financial reporting prior to November 30, 2007.  Although we expect to dedicate necessary resources to develop and implement adequate controls, we can provide no assurance that we will be successful and that such controls will be designed and operating effectively at commencement of operations or at November 30, 2007.  



4233



PART II — OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1. Legal Proceedings  


Not applicableNone.


Item 1A. RickRisk Factors


We believe thatOur investors should consider the Company is, and will continue to be, susceptible to all of the risk factorsrisks set forth in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3/A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 9, 2006, File No. 333-134016, and  the related risk factors set forth in the Company’s Prospectus Supplement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 7, 2006, as well as allPart I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2006, that could affect us and our business. Although we have tried to discuss key factors, our investors need to be aware that other risks may prove to be important in the future. New risks may emerge at any time and we cannot predict such risks or estimate the extent to which risk factors are herebythey may affect our financial performance. Investors should carefully consider the discussion of risks and the other information included or incorporated by reference. We do not believe there has been any material changesreference in the risk factors previously disclosedthis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including Forward-Looking Information, which is included in our most recent Registration StatementPart I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and our Annual Report.Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”


Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds


NoneIn May 2007 we issued 500 shares of our common stock to two sophisticated investors as part of an exchange agreement whereby the purchasers conveyed real property to us in exchange for real property and the shares of common stock. The real property we acquired will be used to support the Superior ethanol plant. The Company did not use an underwriter in connection with this transaction. The issuance of the common stock was exempt from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 and pursuant to Regulation D as promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933.  


Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities


NoneNone.


Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders


NoneWe held our annual meeting of shareholders on April 19, 2007, at which meeting certain members of our Board of Directors (the “Board”) were elected and the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan was considered for approval. Our Board is comprised of three classes. One class of directors is elected at each annual meeting of shareholders for a three-year term. Each year a different class of directors is elected on a rotating basis. The terms of Barry A. Ellsworth, Brian D. Peterson, and Hershel C. Patton expired at the 2007 annual meeting. The terms of Wayne B. Hoovestol, David A. Hart, and Dr. Michael A. Warren expire at the 2008 annual meeting and the terms of Dan E. Christensen, R. Stephen Nicholson, and Robert D. Vavra expire at the 2009 annual meeting.


Barry A. Ellsworth, Brian D. Peterson, and Hershel C. Patton were nominated by the Board for election to the class whose term expires at the 2010 annual meeting of shareholders. The shareholders then elected Barry A. Ellsworth by a vote of 4,490,622 for and 327,239 withheld authority. The shareholders then elected Brian D. Peterson by a vote of 4,755,355 for and 62,507 withheld authority. The shareholders then elected Hershel C. Patton by a vote of 4,675,953 for and 140,708 withheld authority. The shareholders also voted to approve the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan by a vote of 2,546,202 for, 354,235 against and 71,965 abstained.


Item 5. Other Information


None


None.



4334





Item 6. Exhibits  

EXHIBIT INDEX


EXHIBIT NO.

DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT

3(i).1

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i).1 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed December 16, 2004, File No. 333-121321)

3(ii).1

Bylaws of the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii).1 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed December 16, 2004, File No. 333-121321)

10.1

Letter Agreement by and between the Company and U.S. Energy, Inc., dated October 5, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed December 16, 2004, File No. 333-121321)

10.2

Letter of Intent by and between the Company and the City of Shenandoah, dated December 16, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed February 4, 2005, File No. 333-121321)

10.3

Master Loan Agreement, dated January 30, 2006, by and between the Company and Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 6, 2006)

10.4

Construction and Term Loan Supplement, dated January 30, 2006, by and between the Company and Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 6, 2006)

10.5

Construction and Revolving Term Loan Supplement, dated January 30, 2006, by and between the Company and Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA  (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 6, 2006)

10.6

Security Agreement, dated January 30, 2006, by and between the Company and Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 6, 2006)

10.7

Administrative Agency Agreement, dated January 30, 2006, by and between the Company, Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA and CoBank, ACB (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 6, 2006)

10.8

Real Estate Mortgage and Financing Statement, dated January 30, by and between the Company and Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated November 30, 2005)

10.9

Lump Sum Design Build Agreement, dated January 13, 2006, by and between the Company and Fagen, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, dated November 30, 2005)

10.10

Allowance Contract, by and between the Company and BNSF Railway Company, dated January 26, 2006 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated November 30, 2005)

10.11

Share Exchange Agreement, dated February 22, 2006, by and between the Company and the parties identified therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated November 30, 2005)

10.12

Design Build Agreement, dated August 1, 2006, by and between the Company and Agra Industries, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, dated August 31, 2006).

10.13

Employment Agreement, dated September 29, 2006, by and between the Company and Brian L. Larson. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, dated August 31, 2006).



35






EXHIBIT NO.

DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT

10.14

Master Loan Agreement, dated March 15, 2007, by and between Superior Ethanol, LLCL.L.C. and Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 20, 2006)

10.15

Construction and Term Loan Supplement, dated March 15, 2007, by and between Superior Ethanol, LLCL.L.C. and Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 20, 2006)

10.16

Construction and Revolving Term Loan Supplement, dated March 15, 2007, by and between Superior Ethanol, LLCL.L.C. and Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 20, 2006)

10.17

Administrative Agency Agreement, dated March 15, 2007, by and between Superior Ethanol, LLCL.L.C. and Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 20, 2006)

10.18

Security Agreement and Real Estate Mortgage, dated March 15, 2007, by and between Superior Ethanol, LLCL.L.C. and Farm Credit Services of America, FLCA (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 20, 2006)

10.19

Amendment No. 1 to the AIA Document A141-2004 Standard Form of Agreement Between Superior Ethanol, LLCL.L.C. and Agra Industries, LLC, dated March 19, 2007, (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated March 20, 2006)

10.20

Amendment to the Master Loan Agreement, dated May 31, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 13, 2007)

10.21

Revolving Credit Supplement, dated May 31, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 13, 2007)

10.22

Amendment to the Construction and Term Loan Supplement, dated May 31, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 13, 2007)

10.23

Amendment to the Construction and Revolving Term Loan Supplement, dated May 31, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 13, 2007)

10.24

Employment Agreement dated June 8, 2007, by and between the Company and Jerry L. Peters.

20.1

Risk factors as set forth in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3/A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 9, 2006, File No. 333-134016, which risk factors are hereby incorporated by reference.

20.2

Risk factors set forth in the Company’s Prospectus Supplement filed, with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 7, 2006, File No. 333-134016, which risk factors are hereby incorporated by reference.



36






31.1

Certification by Wayne B. Hoovestol under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification by BrianJerry L. LarsonPeters under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certification of Wayne B. Hoovestol pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Certification of BrianJerry L. LarsonPeters pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





45



SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.






Date:  April 9,July 3, 2007

GREEN PLAINS RENEWABLE ENERGY, INC.




By   /s/ Wayne B. Hoovestol_     

Wayne B. Hoovestol
Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)




Date:  April 9,July 3, 2007




By   /s/ BrianJerry L. LarsonPeters        _

BrianJerry L. LarsonPeters
Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)





4637