UNITED STATES

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM Form 10-Q

 X.  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 20152021

. TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 033-17773-NY

B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 033-17773-NY

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

Nevada90-1188745

Nevada

87-0674571

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

incorporation or organization)

Identification Number)

201 Spear Street, Suite 1100, San Francisco, CA94105
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)

3651 Lindell Road, Suite D565

Las Vegas, Nevada 89103

 (Address of principal executive offices)

(424) 256-8560

(Registrant’sIssuer’s telephone number including area code)(424) 256-8560

Not applicableSecurities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

NoneNone
Title of each className of each exchange on which registered

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X. No .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes ☒ No ☐

Yes     .  No X.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, (as definedsmaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Act.

Large Accelerated FilerAccelerated Filer

Large accelerated filer       .

Accelerated filer                        .

Non-accelerated filer         .

Filer

Smaller reporting company X.

Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No

Yes X.  No     .

As of October 31, 2015, the Company had 5,665,485 November 16, 2021, there were 31,975,083 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, issued andthe registrant’s Common Stock were outstanding.

Documents incorporated by reference: None



ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.





B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Page
Number

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1

Item 1. Condensed Financial Statements

4

Condensed Balance Sheets (Unaudited) -at September 30, 20152021(unaudited) and DecemberMarch 31, 2014

2020

4

3

Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - Three Monthsfor the three and Nine Months Ended

six months ended September 30, 20152021 and 2014

2020 (unaudited)

5

4

Condensed Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for the three and six months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020 (unaudited)5
Condensed Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency) (Unaudited) - Nine Months Ended

Cash Flows for the six months ended September 30, 2015

2021 and 2020 (unaudited)

6

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

7

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited) - Three Months and Nine Months Ended

September 30, 2015 and 2014

(unaudited)

8

7

Item 2. 2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

15

19

Item 3. 3

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures aboutAbout Market Risk

20

24

Item 4. 4

Controls and Procedures

20

24

PART II -

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

21

25

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

21

25

Item 2. 2

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

21

25

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

6

Exhibits

21

27

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Signatures

21

Item 5. Other Information

21

Item 6. Exhibits

21

SIGNATURES

22

28





Forward-Looking StatementsROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

Balance Sheets

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For example, statements regarding the Company’s financial position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations, and related assumptions and predictions, are all forward-looking statements. These statements are generally accompanied by words such as “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “potential(ly),” “continue,” “forecast,” “predict,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. The Company believes that the assumptions and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, based on information available to it on the date hereof, but the Company cannot provide assurances that these assumptions and expectations will prove to have been correct or that the Company will take any action that the Company may presently be planning. However, these forward-looking statements are inherently subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual results or experience may differ materially from those expected, anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, available cash, competition, and market and general economic factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed financial statements and notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. The Company does not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect new information, future events or otherwise.(Unaudited)

  September 30, 2021  March 31, 2021 
ASSETS        
Current assets        
Cash $205,336  $800,331 
Accounts receivable  3,400   10,000 
Prepaid and other current assets  18,779   5,000 
Total current assets  227,515   815,331 
Total assets $227,515   815,331 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $432,859  $144,830 
Payable to related party  72,155   35,475 
Deferred revenue  12,500   10,000 
Derivative liability  113,410   - 
Convertible note payable, net of discount  25,448   - 
Total current liabilities  656,372   190,305 
Total liabilities  656,372   190,305 
         
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):        
Preferred stock; $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 and 0 shares authorized; and 0 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2021 and March 31, 2021, respectively  -   - 
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 25,098,416 shares and 24,438,416 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2021 and March 31, 2021, respectively  25,098   24,438 
Additional paid-in capital  5,912,800   4,584,214 
Accumulated deficit  (6,366,755)  (3,983,626)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)  (428,857)  625,026 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit) $227,515  $815,331 


















PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)


 

 

September 30, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

101,811

 

 

$

Funds held in trust by attorney

 

 

 

 

 

25,000

Prepaid expenses

 

 

9,600

 

 

 

Due from related parties

 

 

3,479

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

 

114,890

 

 

 

25,000

Total assets

 

$

114,890

 

 

$

25,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses, including $1,570 and $3,434 to related parties at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively

 

$

65,951

 

 

$

8,666

Advances payable to related party, including accrued interest of $34,388 at December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

140,297

Total current liabilities

 

 

65,951

 

 

 

148,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity (deficiency):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized – 750,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding – 5,665,485 shares and 685,961 shares at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively

 

 

5,665

 

 

 

686

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

2,657,374

 

 

 

2,239,579

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(2,614,100)

 

 

 

(2,364,228)

Total stockholders’ equity (deficiency)

 

 

48,939

 

 

 

(123,963)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficiency)

 

$

114,890

 

 

$

25,000

SeeThe accompanying notes to condensedare an integral part of these financial statements.

3

 


ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.


Statements of Operations


(Unaudited)




  2021  2020  2021  2020 
  For the Three Months Ended September 30,  For the Six Months Ended September 30, 
  2021  2020  2021  2020 
Revenues $9,375  $-  $11,875  $- 
                 
Operating expenses:                
Research and development  294,326   10,304   650,762   13,909 
General and administrative  879,355   220,260  ��1,730,010   314,015 
Total operating expense  1,173,681   230,564   2,380,772   327,924 
Loss from operations  (1,164,306)  (230,564)  (2,368,897)  (327,924)
Other income (expense):                
Change in fair value of derivative liability  6,741   -   6,741   - 
Interest expense  (20,973)  -   (20,973)  - 
Other income (expense)  (14,232)  -   (14,232)  - 
Loss from operations before provision for income taxes  (1,178,538)  (230,564)  (2,383,129)  (327,924)
Provision for income taxes  -   -   -   - 
Net loss $(1,178,538) $(230,564) $(2,383,129) $(327,924)
                 
Net loss per share - basic $(0.05) $(0.01) $(0.10) $(0.01)
Net loss per share - diluted $(0.05) $(0.01) $(0.10) $(0.01)
                 
Shares used in computing net loss per common share:                
Basic  24,464,625   23,349,405   24,610,390   23,234,735 
Diluted  24,464,625   23,349,405   24,610,390   23,234,735 

B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

September 30,

 

 

September 30,

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

Revenues

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative, including $8,759 and $450 to related parties for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $11,819 and $1,442 to related parties for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively

 

 

39,781

 

 

 

450

 

 

 

76,711

 

 

 

1,442

Costs of pending transaction

 

 

79,053

 

 

 

 

 

 

79,053

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

118,834

 

 

 

450

 

 

 

155,764

 

 

 

1,442

Loss from operations

 

 

(118,834)

 

 

 

(450)

 

 

 

(155,764)

 

 

 

(1,442)

Interest expense to related party

 

 

 

 

 

(1,589)

 

 

 

(1,589)

 

 

 

(4,767)

Cost to settle contingent claims, including $50,519 to related parties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(92,519)

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(118,834)

 

 

$

(2,039)

 

 

$

(249,872)

 

 

$

(6,209)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss per common share – basic and diluted

 

$

(0.02)

 

 

$

(0.05)

 

 

$

(0.08)

 

 

$

(0.14)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted

 

 

5,665,485

 

 

 

44,961

 

 

 

3,276,043

 

 

 

44,961

SeeThe accompanying notes to condensedare an integral part of these financial statements.




























5



B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.

4

 

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

(Unaudited)ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Nine MonthsFor the Three and Six Month Periods Ended September 30, 20152020 and 2021

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

Stockholders’

Equity

(Deficiency)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

 Deficit

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

 

685,961

 

$

686

 

$

2,239,579

 

 $

(2,364,228)

 

$

(123,963)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock sold in private placement

 

 

4,979,524

 

 

4,979

 

 

243,997

 

 

 

 

248,976

 

Contribution to capital made in connection with the private placement

 

 

 

 

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

 

175,000

 

Costs related to private placement

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,202)

 

 

 

 

(1,202)

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(249,872)

 

 

(249,872)

 

Balance, September 30, 2015

 

 

5,665,485

 

$

5,665

 

$

2,657,374

 

 $

(2,614,100)

 

$

114,890

 

(Unaudited)

See

  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  (Deficit) 
  Preferred Stock Outstanding  Common Stock Outstanding  Additional Paid-in  Accumulated  Total
Stockholders’ Equity
 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  (Deficit) 
Balance at March 31, 2020  -  $-   22,809,666  $22,810  $1,534,757  $(1,620,044) $(62,477)
Issuance of common stock in connection with private placement  -   -   478,750   478   478,272       478,750 
 Issuance of common stock to consultant                            
 Issuance of common stock to consultant , shares                            
Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of common stock purchase warrants                            
Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of common stock purchase warrants, shares                            
Issuance of common stock to customer                            
Issuance of common stock to customer, shares                            
Stock-based compensation – employee and consultant option grants                            
Net loss                      (97,360)  (97,360)
Balance at June 30, 2020  -   -   23,288,416   23,288   2,013,029   (1,717,404)  318,913 
Issuance of common stock to consultant      -    150,000   150   161,850       162,000 
Net loss                      (230,564)  (230,564)
Balance at September 30, 2020  -  $-   23,438,416  $23,438  $2,174,879  $(1,947,968) $250,349 
                             
Balance at March 31, 2021  -  $-   24,438,416  $24,438  $4,584,214  $(3,983,626) $625,026 
Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of common stock purchase warrants  -   -   550,000   550   581,950       582,500 
Stock-based compensation – employee and consultant option grants                  316,896       316,896 
Net loss                   ��  (1,204,591)  (1,204,591)
Balance at June 30, 2021  -   -   24,988,416   24,988   5,483,060   (5,188,217)  319,831 
Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of common stock purchase warrants  -   -   100,000   100   99,900   -   100,000 
Issuance of common stock to customer  -   -   10,000   10   9,990       10,000 
Stock-based compensation – employee and consultant option grants                  319,850       319,850 
Net loss                      (1,178,538)  (1,178,538)
Balance at September 30, 2021  -  $-   25,098,416  $25,098  $5,912,800  $(6,366,755) $(428,857)

The accompanying notes to condensedare an integral part of these financial statements.

5

 


ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.


Statements of Cash Flows


(Unaudited)


  

Six Months Ended

September 30, 2021

  

Six Months Ended

September 30, 2020

 
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net loss $(2,383,129) $(327,924)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows used in operating activities        
Stock-based compensation  646,746   162,000 
Change in fair value of derivative liability  (6,741)  - 
Amortization of debt discount  19,349   - 
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  6,600   - 
Prepaid and other current assets  (13,779)  - 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  288,029   5,411 
Payable to related party  36,680   - 
Deferred revenue  2,500   - 
Net cash flows used in operating activities  (1,403,745)  (160,513)
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of placement agent fee  682,500   478,750 
Proceeds from convertible note payable, net  126,250   - 
Net cash flows provided by financing activities  808,750   478,750 
Net change in cash  (594,995)  318,237 
Cash at beginning of period  800,331   7,838 
Cash at end of period $205,336  $326,075 
         
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow information:        
Common stock issued to customer for early adopter $10,000  $- 
Common stock issued to consultant in lieu of cash $-  $162,000 
Income taxes paid $-  $- 















B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(249,872)

 

 

$

(6,209)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) decrease in -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

(9,600)

 

 

 

Due from related parties

 

 

(3,479)

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

57,285

 

 

 

1,442

Accrued interest to related party

 

 

(34,388)

 

 

 

4,767

Net cash used in operating activities

 

 

(240,054)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease in funds held in trust by attorney

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

Net cash provided by investing activities

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from private placement

 

 

248,976

 

 

 

Capital contributed in connection with private placement

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

Payment of private placement costs

 

 

(1,202)

 

 

 

Repayment of related party advances

 

 

(105,909)

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

316,865

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase

 

 

101,811

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

101,811

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

35,977

 

 

$

Income taxes

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




SeeThe accompanying notes to condensedare an integral part of these financial statements.

6

 



ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.







B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

(UNAUDITED)

Three Months

1. Business

Our Corporate History

On June 27, 2018 (the “Closing Date”), RocketFuel Blockchain Company (“RBC”) and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

1. Basis of Presentation

The condensed financial statements of B4MC Gold Mines, Inc., a Nevada corporationCorporation (“B4MC” or the “Purchaser”), consummated the transactions contemplated by that certain Contribution Agreement (the “Company”“Contribution Agreement”) made and entered into as of June 27, 2018 by and among RBC, the Purchaser and Gert Funk, Joseph Page, PacificWave Partners Limited, PacificWave Partners UK Ltd. and Saxton Capital Ltd (collectively referred to herein as the “Sellers”, individually each a “Seller”).

Pursuant to the Contribution Agreement the Sellers contributed, transferred, assigned and conveyed to B4MC all right, title and interest in and to one hundred percent (100%) of the issued and outstanding Common Stock of RBC for an aggregate of 17,001,312 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, of B4MC (the “Purchaser Common Stock”), at(such transaction, the “Business Combination”). As a result of the Business Combination, RBC became a 100% wholly owned subsidiary of B4MC. In September 30, 2015,2018 B4MC changed its name to RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc.

Prior to the Business Combination, B4MC was a “shell company,” as such term is defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act. As a result of the Business Combination, we have ceased to be a “shell company.”

The Business Combination was treated as a “reverse acquisition” of RBC for financial accounting purposes. RBC was considered the acquirer for accounting purposes, and the historical financial statements of B4MC before the Business Combination were replaced with the historical financial statements of RBC before the Business Combination in all future filings with the SEC. The Purchaser Common Stock issued to the Sellers in connection with the Business Combination have not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2), which exempts transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering, Regulation D and/or Regulation S promulgated by the SEC under that section. These shares may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration. In this report, references to RocketFuel, the “Company,” “we” and similar terms are to B4MC following the consummation of the reverse acquisition. In September 2018 B4MC changed its name to RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc.

The foregoing description of the Contribution Agreement does not purport to be complete. For further information, please refer to the copy of the Contribution Agreement included as Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K which was filed with the SEC on June 29, 2018. There are representations and warranties contained in the Contribution Agreement that were made by the parties to each other as of the date of execution. The assertions embodied in these representations and warranties were made solely for purposes of the Contribution Agreement and may be subject to important qualifications and limitations agreed to by the parties in connection with negotiating their terms. Moreover, some representations and warranties may not be accurate or complete as of any specified date because they are subject to a contractual standard of materiality that is different from certain standards generally applicable to shareholders or were used for the three monthspurpose of allocating risk between the parties rather than establishing matters as facts. For these reasons, investors should not rely on the representations and nine months ended Septemberwarranties in the Contribution Agreement as statements of factual information.

Business

We provide check-out and payment systems that securely automate and simplify the way online payment and shipping information is received by merchants from their customers. Our “one click” checkout solution is modeled on the “buy now” button on leading eCommerce sites. Our check-out systems are designed to enhance customers’ data protection, enabling consumers to pay for goods and services using cryptocurrencies or by direct transfers from their bank accounts without exposing spending credentials such as credit card data. At the same time, our check-out systems are designed to increase the speed, security and ease of use for both customers and merchants and include a merchant portal that provides detailed transactions and metrics about payments received by the merchant. Our system also includes a customer portal where shoppers are able to track their payments, configure payment defaults and connect with various cryptocurrency exchanges and banks to facilitate payment to merchants. Merchants are able to integrate a unique pop-up user interface that allows customers to pay directly from their eCommerce checkout page with no need to redirect to another website or web page.

7

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 20152021

(UNAUDITED)

Our corporate headquarters are located in San Francisco, California.

2. Interim Financial Statements and 2014, are unaudited.Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information pursuant to Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, these unaudited condensed financial statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, of the Company,accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements include all adjustments (including(consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) have been made that are, which we consider necessary, to present fairly thefor a fair presentation of those financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2015, and thestatements. The results of its operations for the three months and ninesix months ended September 30, 20152021 and 2014, and its cash flows for the ninesix months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. Operating results for the interim periods presented are2021 may not necessarily be indicative of the results tothat may be expected for a fullany succeeding quarter or for the entire fiscal year. TheThese condensed balance sheet at December 31, 2014 has been derived from the Company’s audited financial statements at such date.

The condensed financial statements and related notes have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements as of March 31, 2021 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on July 22, 2021.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments, which are evaluated on an ongoing basis, and that affect the amounts reported in our unaudited condensed financial statements and accompanying notes. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other informationassumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the amounts of revenues and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates and judgments.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on the reported results of operations.

3. Summary of Significant Principles

Other than as discussed herein, our significant accounting policies are described in Note 3 to the audited financial statements as of March 31, 2021 which are included in the Company’sour Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the SEC.SEC on July 22, 2021.


On July 15, 2015,Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative financial instruments, as defined in ASC 815, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities”, consist of financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying variables (e.g. interest rate, security price or other variable), require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, in rare instances, assets.

We do not use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow, market or foreign-currency risks. However, during fiscal 2022 we issued financial instruments including convertible promissory notes payable with embedded conversion features that do not afford equity classification. As required by ASC 815, these embedded conversion options are required to be carried as derivative liabilities, at fair value, in our financial statements.

We estimated the Company filed an amendmentfair value of its bifurcated embedded conversion features using a Stock Path Monte Carlo Simulation model. Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates (such as volatility, estimated life and risk-free rates of return) that may, and are likely to, its Articles of Incorporation withchange over the Secretary of Stateduration of the State of Nevada providing for a one-for-fifty reverse split of its outstanding shares of common stock effective August 21, 2015. All shareinstrument with related changes in internal and per share amounts includedexternal market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the accompanying financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this reverse stock split for all periods presented. The authorized shares of the Company’s common stock were not adjusted as a result the reverse stock split.

2. Organization and Business Operations


Change-in-Control Transaction


On May 12, 2015, the Company sold 4,979,524 newly issued shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to PacificWave Partners Limited, a Gibraltar Company (“PacificWave”), at atrading market price of $0.05 per share, representing aggregate gross proceeds of $248,976. Of this amount, $225,000 was paid to certain creditors and claimants of the Company in exchange for releases of such outstanding claims, and the remaining $23,976 was placed in escrow and was subject to release pending the fulfillment of certain conditions.


Simultaneous with the purchase of the above described shares of common stock, PacificWave purchased from Elwood Shepard, the Company's principal shareholder at the time, 520,476 shares of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, representing 75.9% of the outstanding shares prior to the issuance of the newly issued shares. The purchase price of such shares was $26,024, which amount was deposited into escrow and will be disbursed in the same manner and under the same conditions as the amount deposited into escrow from the purchase price of the Company's newly issued common shares.


In that all conditions were met, all amounts deposited into escrow were disbursed pursuant to the terms of the escrow in July 2015.


At the closing of the purchase of the above described shares, PacificWave contributed $175,000 in cash to the capital of the Company, which was recorded as a credit to additional paid-in capital.


At the closing of the transaction on May 12, 2015, PacificWave transferred 1,000,000 of the Company’s common shares acquired as described herein to three non-U.S. resident accredited investors at a price of $0.50 per share ($500,000 in aggregate). These funds were utilized to effectuate the change-in-control transaction. The Company was not a party to any of these transactions.




At the closing on May 12, 2015, PacificWave transferred 2,698,334 shares to certain persons and entities providing services in connection with the transaction as follows: (i) 466,667 shares (constituting 8.2% of the outstanding shares) to Allan Kronborg, a citizen of Denmark; (ii) a total of 966,667 shares (constituting 17.1% of the outstanding shares) split among PacificWave Partners Europe sarl, PacificWave Partners UK Europe Ltd., Richway Finance Ltd. and Anarholl Ltd., all of which are entities affiliated with Henrik Oerbekker, a citizen of Denmark; and (iii) a total of 1,265,000 shares (constituting 22.3% of the outstanding shares) to nine non-U.S. resident persons and entities.  Effective September 10, 2015, Anarholl Ltd. gifted 126,667 shares to two unaffiliated purchasers in a private transaction, reducing the number of shares beneficially owned by Mr. Oerbekker to 840,000 shares (constituting 14.8% of the outstanding shares).  The Company was not a party to any of these transactions.


Effective May 12, 2015, Elwood Shepard, the Company’s sole officer and director at that time, resigned, and Bennett J. Yankowitz was appointed as the Company’s sole director and as its President, Secretary and Treasurer. In conjunction with the aforementioned transactions with PacificWave, on May 12, 2015, Mr. Yankowitz purchased from PacificWave 800,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $40,000 ($0.05 per share), reflecting approximately 14.1% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock at that time. The purchase price was evidenced by a promissory note due May 12, 2019 with interest at 3% per annum and secured by the purchased shares. The Company was not a party to this transaction. Mr. Yankowitz does not have any interest in or contract with Pacific Wave. PacificWave and Mr. Yankowitz did not have any relationship with the Company prior to the aforementioned change-in-control transaction. On May 15, 2015, Mr. Yankowitz sold 10,000 shares at a purchase price of $0.50 per share ($5,000) to an unaffiliated purchaser.


At the conclusion of all of these transactions, PacificWave and its Managing Director and sole owner, Henrik Rouf, were the beneficial owners of an aggregate of 1,001,666 shares of the Company’sour common stock, which constituted 17.7% of the outstanding shares of common stock.has a high-historical volatility.

8

 

Business

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

The Company was organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, on April 2, 1987, as BK Ventures. The Company was organized to create a corporate vehicle to seek and acquire a business opportunity. In June 2000, the Company reincorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. On October 10, 2013, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to B4MC Gold Mines, Inc. The Company is engaged in efforts to identify an operating company to acquire or merge with through an equity-based exchange transaction that would likely result in a change in control of the Company. As the Company’s planned principal operations have not yet commenced, the Company activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including the need to obtain additional financing, as described below.NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

Henrik Rouf is Managing Director of PacificWave and also serves as Assistant Secretary of the Company. While PacificWave does not have a formal contract with the Company, it is expected to continue to provide consulting and investment banking services to the Company, in particular with respect to raising capital for the Company and in identifying and evaluating potential acquisition candidates. PacificWave has indicated that it intends to use the Company as a platform for the acquisition of an operating company, and that it was currently in the process of evaluating potential acquisition target companies in the global environmental remediation and other market sectors. It is anticipated that any such acquisition, when consummated, would involve one or more of the following: (1) the issuance of additional common stock or other equity securities of the Company to the owners of the acquired company, resulting in a change of control; (2) an extraordinary corporate transaction, such as a merger, reorganization or liquidation, involving the Company; (3) a change in the present board of directors or management of the Company, including any plans or proposals to change the number or term of directors or to fill any existing vacancies on the board; (4) a material change in the present capitalization or dividend policy of the Company; (5) a material change in the present capitalization or dividend policy of the Company; (6) changes in the Company's charter, bylaws or instruments corresponding thereto or other actions which may impede the acquisition of control of the Company by any person; or (7) actions similar to any of those enumerated above.(UNAUDITED)

4. Going Concern

The Company’s condensedOur financial statements have been presented on the basis that it iswe are a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. AtWe incorporated our business on January 12, 2018, the date of our inception, and commenced commercial operations in March 2021. During the three and six months ended September 30, 2015,2021, we reported a net loss of $1,178,538 and $2,383,129, respectively, which included as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Company did not have any business operations. The Company has experienced recurring operating losses statement of operations a non-cash stock-based compensation charge of $329,850 and negative operating$646,746, respectively, and cash flows and has financed its recent working capital requirements throughused in operating activities during the issuance of equity securities, as well as borrowings from related parties. As ofsix months ended September 30, 2015, the Company had working capital2021 of $48,939, primarily as a result of the May 12, 2015 transactions as described herein, and an accumulated deficit of $2,614,100.$1,403,745. As a result, management believes that there is substantial doubt about the Company’sour ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company’sWe will require additional financing to continue to develop our product and execute on our business plan. However, there can be no assurances that we will be successful in raising the additional capital necessary to continue operations and execute on our business plan. During the six months ended September 30, 2021 we raised $682,500 through the exercise by certain investors of common stock purchase warrants. On November 4, 2021, we completed a public offering of 6,666,667 shares of Common Stock and accompanying warrants to purchase 6,666,667 shares of Common Stock and raised $5,000,000 in gross proceeds. See Note 14 – Subsequent Events. We have used and plan to continue using the net proceeds of the private placement, warrant exercise and public offering to recruit key management and operational personnel, to retain software and blockchain developers and to develop our blockchain based check-out solution. Management believes the funding from the private placement, the exercise of the common stock purchase warrant, the public offering and the growth strategy actions executed and planned for execution could contribute to our ability to mitigate any substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concernconcern.

5. New Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other standard setting bodies that may have an impact on our accounting and reporting. We believe that such recently issued accounting pronouncements and other authoritative guidance for which the effective date is in the future either will not have an impact on our accounting or reporting or that such impact will not be material to our financial position, results of operations and cash flows when implemented.

6. Related Party Transactions

During the three and six months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020, our chief financial officer was affiliated with legal counsel who provided us with general legal services (the “Affiliate”). We recorded legal fees paid to the Affiliate of $75,009 and $99,170 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2021, respectively. We recorded legal fees paid to the Affiliate of $15,959 and $21,463 for the three and six months ended September 30, 2020, respectively. As of September 30, 2021 and March 31, 2021 we had $72,155 and $35,475, respectively, payable to the Affiliate.

In May 2021, we paid an affiliate of our executive chairman $3,000 to provide website-related services.

7. Deferred Revenue

We enter into certain contracts typically having initial one-year terms which define the scope of services to be provided. These contracts can include agreed-upon setup fees during the initial one year term which setup fees are recorded as deferred revenue and amortized ratably over the initial one-year term. During the three and six months ended September 30, 2021, we recorded revenues of $5,000and $12,500, respectively, as a result of the amortization of $20,000 of deferred revenues recorded in connection with the execution of contracts with two customers. The contracts with these customers have one-year terms from the date of execution (the “Contract Term”), that provided for the payment of $10,000 in the aggregate in connection with the implementation of our blockchain technology. In addition, the Contract Term provided for transaction processing using our blockchain technology with no fees during the Contract Term as an inducement to adopt our blockchain technology. As of September 30, 2021 and March 31, 2021, we recorded total deferred revenue of $12,500and $10,000, respectively. As of September 30, 2021 and March 31, 2021 there was $0 and $10,000, respectively receivable from these two customers.

9

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

(UNAUDITED)

8. Convertible Note Payable

On August 4, 2021, we entered into a securities purchase agreement with a lender pursuant to which we sold a convertible note payable in the principal amount of $130,000 for cash proceeds of $126,250. The convertible note is due one year from issuance, pays interest at the rate of 8% per annum, unless in default, upon which the interest rate would increase to 22% and the principal balance would increase by 150% or 200% depending upon the nature of the default. The convertible note gives us the right to prepay the note within the first 180 days from issuance at prepayment rates ranging from 110% to 125% of the then outstanding principal and interest balance. At any time during the period beginning 180 days from the origination date to the maturity date or date of default, the holder can convert all or any part of the outstanding balance into common stock at a conversion price per share equal to 65% of the lowest daily volume weighted average price of our common stock during the 10 trading days prior to the date of conversion.

We evaluated the embedded conversion feature and concluded that it required to be bifurcated and accounted for as a derivative liability due to the lack of explicit limit on the number of shares that may be required to be issued to settle the instrument. Accordingly, the fair value of the embedded conversion feature at inception was reflected as a derivative liability in the balance sheet, with a resulting discount applied to the note payable. At inception, the fair value of the conversion feature was deemed to be $120,151 as determined using a Stock Path Monte Carlo Simulation model. The key assumptions used in this valuation included: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 197.41%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 0.07%, (4) expected life of 1 year, and (5) the quoted market price of $1.01 for our common stock.

At September 30, 2021, the embedded conversion feature had a fair value of $113,410, resulting in the recognition of other income of $6,741 in the income statement. The key assumptions used in this valuation included: (1) dividend yield of 0%, (2) expected volatility of 168.92%, (3) risk-free interest rate of 0.09%, (4) expected life of 0.84 year, and (5) the quoted market price of $1.10 for our common stock.

A rollforward of the embedded conversion feature derivative liability for the six months ended September 30, 2021 is as follows:

Schedule of Roll-forward Conversion Feature Derivative liability

     
Beginning balance $- 
Issuances during period  120,151 
Change in fair value during period  (6,741)
Ending balance $113,410 

At inception, the convertible note had a debt discount of $123,901 which will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the note. The remaining debt discount at September 30, 2021 related to the convertible note was $104,552.

9. Income Taxes

We are required to file federal and state income tax returns in the United States. The preparation of these tax returns requires us to interpret the applicable tax laws and regulations in effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax paid by us. In consultation with our tax advisors, we base our tax returns on interpretations that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The tax returns, however, are subject to routine reviews by the various federal and state taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which we file tax returns. As part of these reviews, a taxing authority may disagree with respect to the income tax positions taken by us (“uncertain tax positions”) and, therefore, may require us to pay additional taxes. As required under applicable accounting rules, we accrue an amount for our estimate of additional income tax liability, including interest and penalties, which we could incur as a result of the ultimate or effective resolution of the uncertain tax positions. We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributed to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences and carry-forwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.

10

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

(UNAUDITED)

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional capitalgeneration of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and to ultimately acquire or develop a commercially viable business.tax planning strategies in making this assessment.

We had no income tax credits for the three and six months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020. The Company’s condensed financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.




3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Concentration of Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash. The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by investing its cash with high credit quality financial institutions.


Pending Transaction Costs

Due to the inherent uncertainty associated with the successful completion of a potential acquisition transaction, transaction costs, consisting primarily of fees to professionals, are expensed as incurred. Pending transaction costs were $79,053effective tax rates for the three months and ninesix ended September 30, 2021 was 21.0%. We have estimated our provision for income taxes in accordance with the Tax Act and guidance available as of the date of this filing but have kept the full valuation allowance.

10. Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

On January 9, 2020, we sold 10,000 shares of our common stock to a private investor, resulting in cash proceeds of $10,000. On February 13, 2020, we sold 11,250 shares of our common stock to a private investor, resulting in cash proceeds of $11,250.

On April 29, 2020, we entered into a subscription agreement with a private investor for the purchase of 478,750 shares of our common stock, at a purchase price of $1.00 per share, resulting in cash proceeds of $478,750. This transaction was a part of a private placement of 500,000 shares of common stock. We paid a placement fee of $50,000 in connection with these transactions.

On August 24, 2020, we issued 150,000 shares of our Common Stock to a consultant in lieu of cash for services. The common stock was valued at $162,000, or $1.08 per share, based on an independent appraisal.

On May 1, 2020, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 1,500,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share (the “First Warrant”). The warrant expired on April 30, 2021. The Company also agreed that upon the full and timely exercise of the First Warrant, it would issue a second warrant for an additional 1,500,000 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $1.50 per share having a term of 12 months from the date of issue (the “Second Warrant”). The First Warrant was transferred to an affiliate of the original holder in November 2021. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2021, the warrant holder exercised warrants from the First Warrant to purchase 1,100,000 shares of our common stock of which (i) 1,000,000 shares of our common stock were issued in consideration of gross proceeds of $1,000,000 prior to March 31, 2021; and (ii) 100,000 shares of our common stock, for which we received notice of exercise on March 31, 2021, were issued in April 2021 in consideration of gross proceeds of $100,000. Additionally, the warrant holder exercised the First Warrant for the remaining 400,000 shares of our common stock in April 2021 in consideration of gross proceeds of $400,000. On April 26, 2021 we issued the Second Warrant to the holder. On August 6, 2021, we agreed to amend the terms of the Second Warrant to increase the number of shares purchasable to 2,250,000 and to reduce the exercise price to $1.00 per share. On August 19, 2021, the warrant holder exercised warrants from the Second Warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share.

On February 25, 2021, we entered into a common stock purchase agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) with Triton Funds, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Triton” or the “Selling Stockholder,” which term also includes Triton’s successors and assigns under the Stock Purchase Agreement and the Warrant). Under the Stock Purchase Agreement Triton, which is an unrelated third party, agreed to invest up to $1,000,000 through purchases of our Common Stock during the commitment period (which runs through December 31, 2022). During the commitment period, we may, in our sole discretion, deliver purchase notices to Triton stating the dollar amount of shares which we intend to sell to Triton, not to exceed $500,000 per purchase notice. The amount to be funded under a purchase notice will be the number of shares of Common Stock to be purchased multiplied by the greater of (i) $1.65 or (ii) 80 percent of the lowest closing price of our Common Stock within 15 business days prior to the closing date for the purchase. The closing date for each purchase is five business days following the date of the corresponding purchase notice. As of September 30, 2021, we have not issued any purchase notices pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement. In connection with these transactions, we paid Triton an administrative fee of $15,000.

11

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

(UNAUDITED)

Triton’s obligation to purchase Common Stock is conditioned on certain factors including, but not limited to, our having an effective S-1 registration statement in effect for resale of the Common Stock being purchased and Triton’s ownership not exceeding 4.99% of our issued and outstanding shares at any time.

In connection with the Stock Purchase Agreement, we also issued to Triton warrants to purchase, in one or more instalments, 800,000 shares of our Common Stock (the “Warrants”) at an exercise price equal to the greater of (i) $1.65 per share or (ii) 80 percent of the average closing price of our Common Stock over the 90-calendar day period preceding the Warrant exercise date, subject to adjustments. The Warrants terminate on February 25, 2026. If, at any time after the initial effective date of the S-1 registration statement filed in connection with the Stock Purchase Agreement and during the exercise period of the Warrants, there is no effective registration statement covering the Selling Stockholder’s immediate resale of the shares underlying the exercise of the Warrants (the “Warrant Shares”), then Selling Stockholder may elect to receive Warrant Shares pursuant to a cashless exercise of the Warrants. On May 5, 2021, Triton exercised 50,000 Warrants for an aggregate purchase price of $82,500.

On March 31, 2021, we entered into a contract with one customer having a one-year term from the date of execution that provided for (1) the payment of $10,000 in connection with the implementation of our blockchain technology and (2) the issuance of 10,000 shares of our common stock valued at $1.00 per share in consideration of being an early adopter of our blockchain technology. On August 4, 2021, we issued such 10,000 shares of our common stock to the customer.

From January 1, 2018 through September 30, 2021, we granted stock options under our 2018 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, to issue up to an aggregate of 5,600,595 shares of our common stock to our employees, directors, and consultants, at a weighted average exercise price of $1.08 per share.

On February 15, 2021, we issued a warrant to purchase 265,982 shares of our common stock to our chief executive officer at an exercise price of $1.00 per share.

All of these transactions were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to Regulations D or S, or Rule 701, thereunder.

As of September 30, 2021, and March 31, 2021, we had 25,098,416 shares and 24,438,416 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.

11. Employment Agreements

Gert Funk

Mr. Funk has received a grant of options to purchase 500,000 shares of our Common Stock. The options will be issued under our 2018 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”). The options will (i) be incentive stock options, (ii) have an exercise price equal to $1.08 per share, which is the fair market value per share of our Common Stock on March 15, 2021, as determined by an independent valuation by a qualified appraiser, (iii) have a term of 10 years, (iv) vest and become exercisable as to 1/48th of the shares subject to the options on the 15th day of each calendar month during the term of his employment agreement, commencing on April 15, 2021, (v) be subject to the exercise, forfeiture and termination provisions set forth in the 2018 Plan and (vi) otherwise be evidenced by and subject to the terms of our standard form of stock option agreement. Vesting of the options will be accelerated upon a change of control.

He will also receive a cash bonus equal to 2.5% of the net proceeds (i.e., adjusted for our costs) of any initial exchange offering (IEO), token generation event (TGE) or similar financing (a “Token Transaction”) completed on or before the date that is 12 months after the formal acceptance by the Board of a proposal for a Token Transaction (including a start date, milestones and responsibilities). In the event the Board decides to cancel the Token Transaction, Mr. Funk and the Board shall agree upon a mutually acceptable bonus structure in lieu of the foregoing.

12

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

(UNAUDITED)

Peter M. Jensen

Mr. Jensen’s employment agreement initially provided for a base salary of $7,500 per month, which was to increase to $20,000 per month once we had received gross proceeds of at least $2,000,000 in subsequent equity round financings. Our Board determined that the conditions for the salary increase occurred on February 1, 2021. He is also entitled to a performance bonus of $25,000 per calendar quarter based on his achieving quarterly financial and business objectives and milestones to be determined by our board of directors. During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2021, we recorded bonus expense for Mr. Jensen in the amount of $37,500 of which $12,500 was paid in March 2021 and $25,000 was paid in May 2021.

Mr. Jensen also received a grant of options to purchase 2,393,842 shares of our Common Stock. The options will be issued under our 2018 Plan. The options will (i) be incentive stock options, (ii) have an exercise price equal to $1.08 per share, which is the fair market value per share of our Common Stock on September 15, 2020, as determined by an independent valuation by a qualified appraiser, (iii) have a term of 10 years, (iv) vest and become exercisable as to 1/48th of the shares subject to the options on the 15th day of each calendar month during the term of his employment agreement, commencing on October 15, 2020, (v) be subject to the exercise, forfeiture and termination provisions set forth in the 2018 Plan and (vi) otherwise be evidenced by and subject to the terms of our standard form of stock option agreement. Vesting of the options will be accelerated upon a change of control.

Bennett J. Yankowitz

Mr. Yankowitz’s employment agreement provides for a base salary of $5,833 per month on the basis of a commitment of 20 hours per week. He is also entitled to a performance bonus of $7,500 per calendar quarter based on his achieving quarterly business objectives and milestones. In March 2021 he also received a grant of options to purchase 500,000 shares of our Common Stock. The options will be issued under our 2018 Plan. The options will (i) be incentive stock options, (ii) have an exercise price equal $1.08 per share, which is the fair market value per share of our Common Stock on March 1, 2001, as determined by an independent valuation by a qualified appraiser, (iii) have a term of 10 years, (iv) vest and become exercisable as to 1/48th of the shares subject to the options on the 1st day of each calendar month during the term of his employment agreement, commencing on April 1, 2021, (v) be subject to the exercise, forfeiture and termination provisions set forth in the 2018 Plan and (vi) otherwise be evidenced by and subject to the terms of our standard form of stock option agreement.250,000 of the options will become fully vested and exercisable upon the achievement of business objectives and milestones. In addition, vesting of the options will be accelerated upon a change of control.

12. Stock-Based Compensation

Stock Option Plan

On August 8, 2018, the Board and stockholders holding a majority of our voting power approved the RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc., 2018 Plan, which plan enables us to make awards that qualify as performance-based compensation. Under the terms of the 2018 Plan, the options will (i) be incentive stock options, (ii) have an exercise price equal to the fair market value per share of our common stock on the date of grant as determined by an independent valuation by a qualified appraiser, (iii) have a term of 10 years, (iv) vest and become exercisable pursuant to the terms set forth in the grantees stock option agreement, (v) be subject to the exercise, forfeiture and termination provisions set forth in the 2018 Plan and (vi) otherwise be evidenced by and subject to the terms of our standard form of stock option agreement. We initially reserved 2,000,000 shares of our common stock for issuance in connection with awards under the plan. On September 15, 2020 and March 18, 2021, our board of directors unanimously resolved to amend the 2018 Plan to increase the number of shares of our common stock available for grant to 4,000,000 shares and 6,000,000 shares, respectively. As of September 30, 2021 and March 31, 2021 there were 399,405 shares and 502,230 shares, respectively, of our common stock available for grant pursuant to the 2018 Plan. As of the date of the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we had not yet solicited votes from our stockholders to approve the increase in the number of shares of our common stock available for grant pursuant to the 2018 Plan.

13

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

(UNAUDITED)

Service-Based Stock Option Grants

From August 8, 2018 through September 30, 2021, we granted service-based options to employees and consultants, pursuant to the 2018 Plan, exercisable into a total of 5,000,595 shares of our common stock. In determining the fair value of the service-based options granted during the period from August 8, 2018 through September 30, 2021, we utilized the Black-Scholes pricing model utilizing the following assumptions:

Schedule of Share-based Payment Award, Stock Options, Valuation Assumptions

Service-Based

Options

Option exercise price per share$1.00 - $2.75
Grant date fair market value per share$1.00 - $2.75
Expected term of option in years6.25
Expected volatility40.3% to 220.5%
Expected dividend rate0.00%
Risk free interest rate0.42% to 2.83%

During the three months ended September 30, 2015.


Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Accordingly, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected impact of differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.

The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets2021, we granted service-based options pursuant to the amount that is more likely than not2018 Plan to be realized. In(i) one employee exercisable into 1,010 shares of our common stock at exercise prices from $1.00 per share to $1.11 per share; and (ii) one consultant exercisable into 100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.08 per share. During the event the Company was to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its recorded amount, an adjustmentsix months ended September 30, 2021, we granted service-based options pursuant to the deferred tax assets would be credited2018 Plan to operations in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should the Company determine that it would not be able to realize all or part(i) one employee exercisable into 2,825 shares of its deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to operations in the period such determination was made.

The Company’s effective tax rate is different from the federal statutory rate of 35% due primarily to operating losses that receive no tax benefit as a result of a valuation allowance recorded for such losses.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had federal tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $154,000. The federal tax loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2020, if not previously utilized.

Pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Sections 382 and 383, use of the Company’s net operating loss and credit carryforwards may be limited if a cumulative change in ownership of more than 50% occurs within any three-year period since the last ownership change. The Company may have a change in control under these Sections. However, the Company does not anticipate performing a complete analysis of the limitation on the annual use of the net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards until the time that it projects it will be able to utilize these tax attributes.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company does not have any unrecognized tax benefits related to various federal and state income tax matters.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has in the past issued grants ofour common stock which are measured at the grant date fair valueexercise prices from $1.00 per share to $2.75 per share; and charged to operations over(ii) one consultant exercisable into 100,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.08 per share. In determining the vesting period (if any).


The Company may in the future issue stock options to officers, directors and consultants for services rendered. Options will vest and expire according to terms established at the grant date.

The Company will account for stock-based payments to officers and directors by measuring the cost of services received in exchange for equity awards based on the grant date fair value of the awards,service-based options granted during the three and six months September 30, 2021, we utilized the Black-Scholes pricing model utilizing the following assumptions:

Service-Based

Options

Option exercise price per share$1.00 - $2.75
Grant date fair market value per share$1.00 - $2.75
Expected term of option in years6.25
Expected volatility211.1% to 220.5%
Expected dividend rate0.00%
Risk free interest rate0.71% to 1.02%

Activity under the 2018 Plan for all service-based stock options for the six months ended September 30, 2021 are as follows:

Schedule of Stock Option Activity

  

Options

Outstanding

  

Weighted-

Average Exercise

Price per Share

  

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Term in Years

  

Aggregate

Intrinsic Value

 
Options outstanding at April 1, 2021:  4,897,770  $1.08   9.63   1,175,417 
Granted  102,825   1.10   9.80   - 
Exercised  -             
Cancelled or forfeited  -             
Options outstanding as of September 30, 2021  5,000,595  $1.08   7.96  $99,982 
Options exercisable as of September 30, 2021  1,551,422  $1.08   7.96  $30,998 
Options vested or expected to vest as of September 30, 2021  1,551,422  $1.08   7.96  $30,988 

14

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

(UNAUDITED)

As of September 30, 2021 and March 31, 2021 there were 399,405 shares and 502,230 shares, respectively, of our common stock available for grant pursuant to the 2018 Plan.

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the closing price of the common stock on September 30, 2021 of $1.10 and the exercise price of each in-the-money option) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on September 30, 2021. There were no service-based stock options exercised under the 2018 Plan for the three and six months ended September 30, 2021 and 2020.

For the three and six months ended September 30, 2021, we recorded stock-based compensation expense for service-based stock options pursuant to the 2018 Plan in the amount of $294,446 and $585,939, respectively. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2020, we recorded no stock-based compensation expense for service-based stock options pursuant to the 2018 Plan. As of September 30, 2021, we had $3,623,019 of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to service-based stock options.

Performance-Based Stock Option Grants

We also granted performance-based options pursuant to the 2018 Plan to Rohan Hall, our chief technology officer, which are exercisable into 600,000 shares of our common stock subject to certain designated milestones. On March 18, 2021, our Board of Directors determined that Mr. Hall earned all of the performance-based options effective February 1, 2021. The Board of Directors also entered into a resolution whereby 75,000 shares of our common stock underlying the performance-based options would vest immediately and 525,000 shares of our common stock underlying the performance-based option would vest ratably over a 48 month period with the cost recognized as compensation expense infirst vesting date being February 1, 2021.

In determining the Company’s financial statements on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the awards.

The Company will account for stock-based payments to consultants by determining thefair value of the performance-based options granted Mr. Hall on September 14, 2020 and earned effective February 1, 2021, we utilized the Black-Scholes pricing model utilizing the following assumptions:

Schedule of Share-based Payment Award, Stock Options, Valuation Assumptions

  Performance -Based Options 
Option exercise price per share $1.08 
Grant date fair market value per share $1.08 
Expected term of option in years  6.25 
Expected volatility  85.0%
Expected dividend rate  0.00%
Risk free interest rate  0.54%

15

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

(UNAUDITED)

Activity under the 2018 Plan for all performance-based stock options for the six months ended September 30, 2021 is as follows:

Schedule of Stock Option Activity

  Options Outstanding  

Weighted- Average Exercise

Price per Share

  Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years  Aggregate Intrinsic Value 
Balance at April 1, 2021  600,000   1.08   9.83   144,000 
Granted  -             
Exercised  -             
Cancelled or forfeited  -             
Options outstanding as of September 30, 2021  600,000  $1.08   9.21  $12,000 
Options exercisable as of September 30, 2021  151,566  $1.08   8.96  $3,031 
Options vested or expected to vest as of September 30, 2021  151,566  $1.08   8.96  $3,031 

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the closing price of the common stock on September 30, 2021 of $1.10 and the exercise price of each in-the-money option) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on September 30, 2021. There were no performance-based stock options exercised under the 2018 Plan for the three months ended September 30, 2021.

For the three and six months ended September 30, 2021, we recorded performance-based compensation based uponexpense for performance-based stock options pursuant to the measurement2018 Plan in the amount of $25,404 and $50,808, respectively. For the three and six months ended September 30, 2020, we recorded no performance-based compensation expense for performance-based stock options pursuant to the 2018 Plan. As of September 30, 2021, we had $347,167 of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to performance-based stock options.

13. Legal Proceedings

Other than as set forth below, we are not the subject of any pending legal proceedings; and to the knowledge of management, no proceedings are presently contemplated against us by any federal, state or local governmental agency. Further, to the knowledge of management, no director or executive officer is party to any action in which any party has an interest adverse to us.

On October 8, 2020, we filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against Joseph Page, our former director and chief technology officer. On January 13, 2021, the case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas Division. The causes of action include securities fraud under Federal and California law; fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment under California law; and violation of California Business and Professions Code §17200 et seq.

We are seeking injunctive and declaratory relief as well as damages of at least $5.1 million. On May 29, 2019, Mr. Page resigned from our board. After his resignation, we retained independent patent counsel to review our patent applications. In connection with this review, we discovered certain deficiencies in some of the applications and in their assignments to us. We determined that all of the applications had been abandoned. Based on this review, we decided to refile three of our applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which we did in May 2020. It is our belief that the three newly filed patent applications cover and/or disclose the same subject matter as we disclosed in the five original patent applications. In this case, our rights may be subject to any intervening patent applications made after the dates of the original applications. In the lawsuit, we are alleging that Mr. Page was aware of the abandonments when he assigned the patents to RBC, a private corporation that he controlled, and that he failed to disclose to us the abandonments when we acquired RBC in exchange for shares of our Common Stock. Mr. Page has filed an answer denying our clams and has asserted cross- and counterclaims against us and several of our shareholders alleging breach of contract and fraud. In September 2021, Mr. Page voluntarily dismissed all of the counterclaims against the shareholders. We intend to vigorously contest these allegations.

On March 2, 2021, we filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP (“EGS”) for negligence and legal malpractice, breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty. EGS had represented RBC prior to the Business Combination and represented us after the closing of the Business Combination through August 2019. In the litigation against Mr. Page, he has alleged that he provided information to an EGS partner that the patent applications had been abandoned and that EGS failed to inform RBC and us of that fact. We are seeking damages and the return of legal fees previously paid.

16

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

(UNAUDITED)

14. Subsequent Events

We evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date at either (a)through the date at whichwhen we issued these financial statements and, other than the matters discussed below, we did not have any other material recognizable subsequent events during this period.

Issuance of Common stock to a performance commitment is reached or (b) atCustomer

In April 2021, we entered into a contract with one customer having a one-year term from the date of execution that provided for (1) the payment in installments of $10,000 in connection with the implementation of our blockchain technology and (2) the issuance of 10,000 shares of our common stock valued at $1.00 per share in consideration of being an early adopter of our blockchain technology. On October 6, 2021, we issued such 10,000 shares of our common stock to the customer.

Geneva Roth Convertible Note Transaction

On November 8, 2021, we repaid in full the convertible note issued to Geneva Roth, described in Note 8. There were no conversions on the convertible note prior to November 8, 2021 repayment date.

G Kapital Convertible Note Transaction

On September 9, 2021, we entered into Subscription Agreement (the “Subscription Agreement”) with G Kapital AsP, an accredited investor (the “Investor”), pursuant to which the necessary performanceInvestor agreed to earnpurchase a convertible promissory note in the equity instruments is complete.principal amount of $1,500,000 (the “Note”). On September 14, 2021, we amended and restated the Subscription Agreement (as so Amended and Restated, the “A&R Subscription Agreement”) to, among other things, provide that the closing date will be the earlier of October 15, 2021 or such earlier date as agreed between the parties (subject to the terms and conditions of the A&R Subscription Agreement), and that we may terminate the A&R Subscription Agreement at any time prior to the Investor’s payment for the Note. G Kapital did not consummate the purchase of the Note by the closing date, and the Note was not issued.

 

Options grantedAmendment of Triton Funds Stock Purchase agreement and Warrants

On October 11, 2021, we and Triton Funds, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Triton”), an unrelated third party, entered into an amendment to outside consultants will be revalued each reportingthe Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the “CSPA”) dated February 25, 2021. Under the CSPA, Triton agreed to invest up to $1,000,000 in the Company through purchases of common stock during the commitment period (which runs through December 31, 2022). During the commitment period, the Company may, in its sole discretion, deliver purchase notices to determineTriton stating the dollar amount of shares which the Company intends to sell to Triton, not to exceed $500,000 per purchase notice. The amount to be recordedfunded under a purchase notice under the CSPA, as an expense inamended, is the respective period. As the options vest, they will be valued on each vesting date and an adjustment will be recorded for the difference between the value already recorded and the then current value on the date of vesting.




The fair value of stock options granted will be estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

Earnings Per Share

The Company’s computation of earnings per share (“EPS”) includes basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is measured as the income (loss) available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is similar to basic EPS but presents the dilutive effect on a per share basis of potential common shares (such as common shares issuable pursuant to convertible debt, options and/or warrants) as if they had been converted at the beginning of the periods presented, or issuance date, if later. Potential common shares that have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e., those that increase income per share or decrease loss per share) are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS.

Loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding duringto be purchased multiplied by the respective periods. Basic and diluted loss per common share are the same for all periods presented, as there were no convertible debt, optionsgreater of (i) $1.00 (changed from $1.65) or warrants outstanding during any(ii) eighty percent (80%) of the periods presented.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The authoritative guidance with respect to fair value established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels, and requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of three categories, as presented below. Disclosure as to transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, and activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, is also required.

Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for an identical asset or liability that the Company has the ability to access aslowest closing price of the measurement date. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 1 inputs include active-exchange traded securities and exchange-based derivatives.

Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices includedcommon stock within Level 1, which are directly observablefifteen business days prior to the closing date for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include fixed income securities, non-exchange based derivatives, mutual funds, and fair-value hedges.

Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which therepurchase. The closing date for each purchase is little or no market data for the asset or liability which requires the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 3 inputs include infrequently-traded non-exchange-based derivatives and commingled investment funds, and are measured using present value pricing models.

The Company determines the level in the fair value hierarchy within which each fair value measurement falls in its entirety, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. In determining the appropriate levels, the Company performs an analysis of the assets and liabilities at each reporting period end.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities atfive business days following the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain comparative figures in 2014 have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications were immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate.




Recent Accounting Pronouncementscorresponding purchase notice.

 

In May 2014,connection with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09),Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. ASU 2014-09 also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. Based on the FASB’s Exposure Draft Update issued on April 29, 2015,Revenue from Contracts With Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, it is expected that ASU 2014-09 will now be effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Entities will be able to transitionamendment to the standard either retrospectivelyCSPA, the Company also amended the warrants issued to Triton. As amended the warrants are to purchase, in one or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption.  The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 (ASU 2014-15),Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-10). ASU 2014-15 provides guidance as to management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2014-15 will have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

In January 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 (ASU 2015-01),Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20).ASU 2015-01 eliminatesmore installments, 1,300,000 shares (increased from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Subtopic 225-20, Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items, required that an entity separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions. Presently, an event or transaction is presumed to be an ordinary and usual activity of the reporting entity unless evidence clearly supports its classification as an extraordinary item. Paragraph 225-20-45-2 contains the following criteria that must both be met for extraordinary classification: (1) Unusual nature. The underlying event or transaction should possess a high degree of abnormality and be of a type clearly unrelated to, or only incidentally related to, the ordinary and typical activities of the entity, taking into account the environment in which the entity operates. (2) Infrequency of occurrence. The underlying event or transaction should be of a type that would not reasonably be expected to recur in the foreseeable future, taking into account the environment in which the entity operates. If an event or transaction meets the criteria for extraordinary classification, an entity is required to segregate the extraordinary item from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. The entity also is required to disclose applicable income taxes and either present or disclose earnings-per-share data applicable to the extraordinary item. ASU 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the guidance prospectively. A reporting entity also may apply the guidance retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2015-01 will have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.




In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02 (ASU 2015-02),Consolidation (Topic 810).ASU 2015-02 changes the guidance with respect to the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation800,000 under the revised consolidation mode. ASU 2015-02 affects the following areas:  (1) limited partnerships and similar legal entities; (2) evaluating fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider as a variable interest; (3) the effect of fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination; (4) the effect of related parties on the primary beneficiary determination; and (5) certain investment funds. ASU 2015-02 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the guidance in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. A reporting entity may apply the amendments in this guidance using a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. A reporting entity also may apply the amendments retrospectively. The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2015-02 will have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03 (ASU 2015-03),Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). ASU 2015-03 simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs and requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the new guidance. ASU 2015-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within that fiscal year. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. An entity is required to apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented is adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. Upon transition, an entity is required to comply with the applicable disclosures for a change in an accounting principle. These disclosures include the nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle, the transition method, a description of the prior-period information that has been retrospectively adjusted, and the effect of the change on the financial statement line items (i.e., debt issuance cost asset and the debt liability). The adoption of ASU 2015-03 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, authoritative guidance, if currently adopted, would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

4. Rescinded Acquisition of Mining Assets


On September 3, 2013, the Company and Avidity Holdings LLC, a Utah limited liability company ("Avidity"), entered into an assignment to acquire six unpatented mining claims in Nye County, Nevada, in consideration of the Company’s issuance of 136,208.04 shares of common stock valued at $36,004 ($0.26434 per share). In October 2014, the Company entered into a Rescission of Assignment with Avidity, whereby the mining claims were returned to Avidity in exchange for the return of the shares of the Company’s common stock.


On September 6, 2013, the Company and its majority shareholder, Elwood Shepard, entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Shannon Anderson and Herbert Christopherson (the “Sellers”), pursuant to which the Company purchased two parcels of real property located in Mineral County, Montana, and several items of mining machinery and equipment from the Sellers in consideration of 1,092,000 shares of common stock valued at $285,480 ($0.26143 per share), and assumed debt of $109,443. On May 22, 2014, a Mutual Rescission Agreement was entered into between the parties, whereby the real property, mining machinery and equipment were returned to the Sellers in exchange for 951,000 of the 1,092,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The 1,092,000 shares of common stock had not been issued through May 22, 2014. The remaining 141,000 shares of common stock, valued at $7,050 ($0.05 per share), were retained by the Sellers as liquidated damages, and were issued on December 31, 2014. In conjunction with this matter, the parties entered into a settlement agreement and mutual release.


On September 9, 2013, the Company issued 12,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $3,172 ($0.26434 per share) in exchange for consulting services to be provided by an officer of the Company. These shares were returned to the Company and cancelled pursuant to the above described rescissions. In conjunction with this matter, the parties entered into settlement agreements and mutual releases.


As all of the above-described stock transactions were subsequently rescinded, they were not recorded on the books of the Company, except for the 141,000 shares of common stock issued to Anderson and Christopherson on December 31, 2014.




On September 9, 2013, the Company issued 91,791.96 shares of common stock having a fair value of $24,264 ($0.26434 per share) in exchange for consulting services to be provided by Red Rock Servicing, Inc. (“Red Rock”).  Previous management of the Company determined that the contracted services were never performed, and demanded the return of such shares from Red Rock. The Company has issued stop-transfer instructions to its transfer agent, and has consistently excluded these shares from the reported total of its outstanding shares. The Company is currently engaged in a dispute regarding such shares with Red Rock and is indemnified with respect to such matter by the former controlling shareholders of the Company.  On November 4 , 2015, the Company filed a civil action in the Third District Court, State of Utah, for a declaratory judgment that the consulting agreement was not valid and enforceable, for rescission of the agreement and the issuance of the shares, and for damages for fraud and negligent misrepresentation. The Company intends to cancel these shares upon their return.


5. Stockholders’ Equity


The Company has authorized a total of 750,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share.

On May 12, 2015, the Company sold 4,979,524 newly issued shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to PacificWave at a price of $0.05 per share, representing aggregate proceeds of $248,976.


At the closing of the above described purchase of shares on May 12, 2015, PacificWave contributed $175,000 in cash to the capital of the Company, which was recorded as a credit to additional paid-in capital.


On July 15, 2015, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada providing for a one-for-fifty reverse split of its outstanding shares of common stock effective August 21, 2015. The authorized sharesCSPA) of the Company’s common stock were not adjusted as a result(the “Warrants”) at an exercise price equal to the reverse stock split.


See Note 4 for a descriptiongreater of additional(i) $1.00 per share (changed from $1.65) and (ii) eighty percent (80%) of the average closing price of the common stock transactions. over the 90-calendar day period preceding the Warrant exercise date, subject to adjustments. The Warrants terminate on February 25, 2026.

 

6. SatisfactionOn May 5, 2021, Triton exercised 50,000 Warrants for an aggregate purchase price of Amounts Due$82,500 ($1.65 per share). After the amendment, 1,250,000 Warrants remain unexercised.

17

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

(UNAUDITED)

Public Offering of Common Stock

On November 4, 2021, we completed a public offering (the “Offering”) of 6,666,667 shares of our common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) and warrants to Related Partiespurchase 6,666,667 shares of Common Stock (the “Common Warrants”). The combined purchase price of one share of Common Stock and Resolutionaccompanying Common Warrant was $0.75. The Offering was made under an effective registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-260420) initially filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 22, 2021, as subsequently amended, and declared effective on October 28, 2021.

The Common Warrants are immediately exercisable at an exercise price equal to $0.75 per share of Contingent ClaimsCommon Stock (the “Exercise Price”), subject to adjustments as provided under the terms of the Common Warrants. The Warrants are exercisable for five and one-half years from the initial exercise date.

 As of December 31, 2014, the Company was indebted to a significant vendor, who was consequently deemed to be a related party, for funds advanced in the amount of $140,297, including interest accrued at 6% per annum in the amount of $34,388. The advances, including accrued interest, were due and payable upon demand. This obligation, including accrued interest of $35,977 on May 12, 2015, was paid in cashOn November 1, 2021, in connection with the change-in-control transaction described at Note 2.Offering, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain institutional investors. The Purchase Agreement sets forth the economic terms set forth above and contains our customary representations and warranties, as well as certain indemnification obligations and ongoing covenants. In addition, accounts payable inunder the amountPurchase Agreement, we agreed not to issue, enter into any agreement to issue or announce the issuance or proposed issuance of $8,071 andany of our shares (or our subsidiaries’) Common Stock or common stock equivalents for a contingent liabilityperiod of the Company in the amount of $46,543 which arose in conjunction with the change-in-control negotiations, were also satisfied by cash payments on May 12, 2015 in connection with90 days from the closing of the change-in-control transaction describedOffering, other than certain exempt issuances. Additionally, we also agreed for a period of two years following the closing date of the Offering not to (i) issue or agree to issue equity or debt securities convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for, Common Stock at Note 2.


An additional contingent liabilitya conversion price, exercise price or exchange price which floats with the trading price of $3,976our Common Stock or which may be adjusted after issuance upon the occurrence of certain events or (ii) enter into any agreement, including an equity line of credit, whereby we may issue securities at a future-determined price. This agreement does not apply to the Company's former principal stockholder was also satisfied inoffer, issuance or sale by us of Common Stock pursuant to an at-the-market offering facility we may enter with the placement agent of the Offering following expiration of the 90-day lock-up period.

The net proceeds to us from the Offering, after deducting placement agent’s fees and other Offering expenses, and excluding the proceeds, if any, from the exercise of the Common Warrants, were approximately $4.37 million. We intend to use the net proceeds of the Offering for general corporate purposes and to fund ongoing operations and expansion of our business.

In connection with the closingOffering, pursuant to an engagement letter (the “Engagement Letter”) dated as of July 9, 2021, as amended on September 20, 2021 and on October 28, 2021 between us and H.C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (“Wainwright”), we paid Wainwright (i) a total cash fee equal to 8.0% of the change-in-control transaction described at Note 2.

The Company settled a contingent claim to a non-related party for legal services rendered in connection withaggregate gross proceeds received by us from the rescinded mining transactions, which also arose in conjunction with the change-in-control negotiations, by a cash payment of $42,000 on May 12, 2015 in connection with the closingsale of the change-in-controlsecurities in the transaction, described at Note 2.


7. Commitments and Contingencies

On May 1, 2015,(ii) a non-accountable expense allowance of $75,000. Pursuant to the Company executed a month-to-month leaseEngagement Letter, we also issued to Wainwright or its designees warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 533,333 shares of Common Stock (8.0% of the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock sold in the Offering) (the “Placement Agent Warrants”). The Placement Agent Warrants have substantially the same terms as the Warrants, except that the Placement Agent Warrants are exercisable for office space beginning May 1, 2015 at a cost of $4,200 per month.  On November 1, 2015, the month-to-month lease was modified by reducing the amount of space leased with a corresponding reduction in rent to $2,100 per month.


Information with respect to a current dispute is provided at Note 4.

8. Subsequent Events

The Company performed an evaluation of subsequent events throughfive years from the date of filingthe Purchase Agreement and have an exercise price equal to 125% of these financial statements with the SEC, noting no additional items requiring disclosure. purchase price per share of Common Stock in the Offering, or $0.9375 per share.






18

ITEM

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONSManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

OverviewForward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain statements that are “forward-looking” within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements and other information are based on our beliefs as well as assumptions made by us using information currently available.

The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “will,” “should” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect our current views with respect to future events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and are not guaranties of future performance. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended or using other similar expressions. We are making investors aware that such forward-looking statements, because they relate to future events, are by their very nature subject to many important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from our predictions include, without limitation:

Market acceptance of our products and services;
Competition from existing products or new products that may emerge;
The implementation of our business model and strategic plans for our business and our products;
Estimates of our future revenue, expenses, capital requirements and our need for financing;
Our financial performance;
Current and future government regulations;
Developments relating to our competitors; and
Other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under the section titled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis”

Although we have sought to identify the most significant risks to our business, we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, any of such risks may be realized, nor can there be any assurance that we have identified all possible issues which we might face. For all of these reasons, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained herein, which speak only as of the date hereof. We assume no responsibility to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise except as required by law. We urge readers to review carefully the risk factors described in this Quarterly Report and in the other documents that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You can read these documents at www.sec.gov.

Overview

Our Corporate History

On June 27, 2018 (the “Closing Date”), RocketFuel Blockchain Company (“RBC”) and B4MC Gold Mines, Inc., a Nevada Corporation (“B4MC” or the “Purchaser”), consummated the transactions contemplated by that certain Contribution Agreement (the “Company”“Contribution Agreement”) was organized undermade and entered into as of June 27, 2018 by and among RBC, the lawsPurchaser and Gert Funk, Joseph Page, PacificWave Partners Limited, PacificWave Partners UK Ltd. and Saxton Capital Ltd (collectively referred to herein as the “Sellers”, individually each a “Seller”).

Pursuant to the Contribution Agreement the Sellers contributed, transferred, assigned and conveyed to B4MC all right, title and interest in and to one hundred percent (100%) of the Stateissued and outstanding Common Stock of Delaware, on April 2, 1987, as BK Ventures. The Company was organized to create a corporate vehicle to seek and acquire a business opportunity. In June 2000, the Company reincorporated under the lawsRBC for an aggregate of the State of Nevada. On October 10, 2013, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to B4MC Gold Mines, Inc. The Company is engaged in efforts to identify an operating company to acquire or merge with through an equity-based exchange transaction that would likely result in a change in control of the Company. As the Company’s planned principal operations have not yet commenced, the Company activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including the need to obtain additional financing, as described below.


Change-in-Control Transaction


On May 12, 2015, the Company sold 4,979,524 newly issued17,001,312 shares of its common stock,Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, to PacificWave Partners Limited,of B4MC (the “Purchaser Common Stock”), (such transaction, the “Business Combination”). As a Gibraltar Company (“PacificWave”), at a price of $0.05 per share, representing aggregate gross proceeds of $248,976. Of this amount, $225,000 was paid to certain creditors and claimantsresult of the CompanyBusiness Combination, RBC became a 100% wholly owned subsidiary of B4MC. In September 2018 B4MC changed its name to RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc.

19

Prior to the Business Combination, B4MC was a “shell company,” as such term is defined in exchangeRule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act. As a result of the Business Combination, we have ceased to be a “shell company.” The information contained in this Report constitutes the information necessary to satisfy the conditions contained in Rule 144(i)(2) under the Securities Act.

The Business Combination was treated as a “reverse acquisition” of RBC for releases of such outstanding claims,financial accounting purposes. RBC was considered the acquirer for accounting purposes, and the remaining $23,976 was placed in escrow and was subject to release pendinghistorical financial statements of B4MC before the fulfillment of certain conditions.


SimultaneousBusiness Combination were replaced with the purchasehistorical financial statements of RBC before the above described shares of common stock, PacificWave purchased from Elwood Shepard,Business Combination in all future filings with the Company's principal shareholder at the time, 520,476 shares of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, representing 75.9% of the outstanding shares priorSEC. The Purchaser Common Stock issued to the issuance of the newly issued shares. The purchase price of such shares was $26,024, which amount was deposited in escrow and will be disbursed in the same manner and under the same conditions as the amount deposited into escrow from the purchase price of the Company's newly issued common shares.


In that all conditions were met, all amounts deposited into escrow were disbursed pursuant to the terms of the escrow in July 2015.


At the closing of the purchase of the above described shares, PacificWave contributed $175,000 in cash to the capital of the Company, which was recorded as a credit to additional paid-in capital.


At the closing of the transaction on May 12, 2015, PacificWave transferred 1,000,000 of the Company’s common shares acquired as described herein to three non-U.S. resident accredited investors at a price of $0.50 per share ($500,000 in aggregate). These funds were utilized to effectuate the change-in-control transaction. The Company was not a party to any of these transactions.


At the closing on May 12, 2015, PacificWave transferred 2,698,334 shares to certain persons and entities providing servicesSellers in connection with the transaction as follows: (i) 466,667Business Combination have not been registered under the Securities Act, in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(a)(2), which exempts transactions by an issuer not involving any public offering, and Regulation D and/or Regulation S promulgated by the SEC under that section. These shares (constituting 8.2%may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration. In this prospectus, references to RocketFuel, the “Company,” “we” and similar terms are to B4MC following the consummation of the outstanding shares)reverse acquisition. In September 2018 B4MC changed its name to Allan Kronborg, a citizen of Denmark; (ii) a total of 966,667 shares (constituting 17.1%RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc.

The foregoing description of the outstanding shares) split among PacificWave Partners Europe sarl, PacificWave Partners UK Europe Ltd., Richway Finance Ltd. and Anarholl Ltd., all of which are entities affiliated with Henrik Oerbekker, a citizen of Denmark; and (iii) a total of 1,265,000 shares (constituting 22.3%Contribution Agreement does not purport to be complete. For further information, please refer to the copy of the outstanding shares)Contribution Agreement included as Exhibit 2.1 to nine non-U.S. resident personsthe Current Report on Form 8-K which was filed with the SEC on June 29, 2018. There are representations and entities. Effective September 10, 2015, Anarholl Ltd. gifted 126,667 shareswarranties contained in the Contribution Agreement that were made by the parties to two unaffiliated purchasers in a private transaction, reducing the number of shares beneficially owned by Mr. Oerbekker to 840,000 shares (constituting 14.8%each other as of the outstanding shares).date of execution. The Company wasassertions embodied in these representations and warranties were made solely for purposes of the Contribution Agreement and may be subject to important qualifications and limitations agreed to by the parties in connection with negotiating their terms. Moreover, some representations and warranties may not be accurate or complete as of any specified date because they are subject to a partycontractual standard of materiality that is different from certain standards generally applicable to shareholders or were used for the purpose of allocating risk between the parties rather than establishing matters as facts. For these reasons, investors should not rely on the representations and warranties in the Contribution Agreement as statements of factual information.

Our Business

We provide check-out and payment systems that securely automate and simplify the way online payment and shipping information is received by merchants from their customers. Our “one click” checkout solution is modeled on the “buy now” button on leading eCommerce sites. Our check-out systems are designed to enhance customers’ data protection, enabling consumers to pay for goods and services using cryptocurrencies or by direct transfers from their bank accounts without exposing spending credentials such as credit card data. At the same time, our check-out systems are designed to increase the speed, security and ease of use for both customers and merchants and include a merchant portal that provides detailed transactions and metrics about payments received by the merchant. Our system also includes a customer portal where shoppers are able to track their payments, configure payment defaults and connect with various cryptocurrency exchanges and banks to facilitate payment to merchants. Merchants are able to integrate a unique pop-up user interface that allows customers to pay directly from their eCommerce checkout page with no need to redirect to another website or web page.

Our merchant portal is updated instantly when a payment transaction is made on the merchant website. The merchant is notified of the transaction and can see the transaction details, including the customer that made the transaction, the transaction amount and the transaction items. This information is added to the merchant dashboard where various metrics are tracked and displayed to the merchant, including information about the various cryptocurrencies that are used for payments to that merchant the different currencies received by the merchant as payment. In addition to various metrics, merchants are able to see a variety of reports, and are able to configure various options including settlement options from their portal.

20

Customers of merchants that use the RocketFuel payment solution are able to track their payments in their online portal. They are also able to track payments they made to all the merchants that are integrated with the RocketFuel payment technology within one consolidated user portal. They are currently able to connect to their accounts on Coinbase and in the future we plan to add connectivity to Binance, Kraken, Gemini and other exchanges. They can also pay from any cryptocurrency wallet. Customers are able to pay from bank accounts as well. These customers are able to make payment with any of these transactions.payment options with 1, 2, or 3 clicks from the merchant checkout page. By default, these customers can choose from dozens of cryptocurrencies to pay from.


Effective May 12, 2015, Elwood Shepard,Our payment user interface allows customers to easily onboard as well as to pay for merchants’ products or services with a variety of cryptocurrencies or via bank transfers. The user interface is displayed as a stand-alone popup that allows the Company’s sole officercreation of new accounts as well as payment directly from crypto exchanges, crypto wallets, and directorbank accounts, with no redirects to browser tabs or pages. This can be integrated as a plugin on the merchant checkout page or as a browser extension. The plugin, which we are currently developing, will come integrated with popular eCommerce platforms including WooCommerce, Shopify, Prestashop and others. The browser extension is integrated with popular browsers including Chrome, Chromium, Opera, Firefox, and Edge. The payment interface is designed for both web and mobile checkout experiences. Merchants are able to integrate the RocketFuel payment interface to their checkout page with software development kits (SDKs) that are available via the merchant portal. Application programming interfaces (APIs) are also available to the merchant for deeper integration into backend systems, ERP platforms, and other third-party platforms.

The RocketFuel payment solution utilizes a variety of blockchains in its execution including Bitcoin, Ethereum and others where the payment transactions are stored. A significant benefit of this technology is that the entire shopping cart checkout process will be accomplished via a distributed ledger or “blockchain,” meaning that merchant websites will no longer be required to operate complex payment and check-out infrastructures.

Our solution is designed to be implemented on an eCommerce site’s check-out page. The technology will also be used for different scenarios, including paying for services, paying invoices, and other payment strategies. In addition, we anticipate that a future version of our payment system will allow for advertisements in which the entire check out process is embedded to be placed on third party websites where sales may be completely finalized. Thus, our technology will enable eCommerce strategies that can include advertisements with a fully integrated check-out process. We believe that this has never before been accomplished on any eCommerce platform. We believe that such advertisements could provide significant new sales channels to retailers that are simply not possible with legacy check-out solutions. We also believe that transaction costs on our system will be significantly less expensive than the cost of credit-card transactions.

The RocketFuel check-out solution is based on a streamlined one- to-three-click check-out process for eCommerce purchases. The system is designed to operate identically across merchant channels with all participating merchants. eCommerce merchants are able to encode their check-out protocol to support our technology and the merchants will no longer have to administer complex check-out and payment gateways at their eCommerce websites. At the same time, consumers are able to experience enhanced data protection opportunities and significantly improved convenience.

With the RocketFuel check-out systems, consumers will no longer have to enter credit card information or shipping details every time they want to buy online. Payment and shipping information will be handled automatically. Using the RocketFuel payment solution, credit card data will no longer be shared or transmitted and exposed online. Rather, payments will be made via 100% secure cryptocurrency conveyance or direct bank transfer on the blockchain.

Our corporate headquarters are located in San Francisco, California.

21

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 3 to the financial statements as of March 31, 2021 which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. There were no changes to our significant accounting policies during the three and six months ended September 30, 2021 as compared to the significant account policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2021. Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon these financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that time, resigned,affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and Bennett J. Yankowitz was appointedexpenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. In the past, actual results have not been materially different from our estimates. However, results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Results of Operations

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021 vs September 30, 2020

Revenues

During the three months ended September 30, 2021, we recorded revenues of $9,375 as a result of (i) the Company’s sole director and as its President, Secretary and Treasurer. In conjunctionrecognition of $5,000 of setup fee revenues on the amortization of deferred revenues of $20,000 recorded since March 31, 2021 in connection with the aforementioned transactionsexecution of contracts with PacificWave, on May 12, 2015, Mr. Yankowitz purchasedtwo customers; and (ii) normally occurring service fee revenues of $4,375 with several customers. During the three months ended September 30, 2020, we did not generate any revenue and had not yet commenced commercial operations.

We anticipate that future revenues will continue to be generated from PacificWave 800,000 shares(i) fees charged in connection with the implementation of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $40,000 ($0.05 per share), reflecting approximately 14.1%our blockchain technology; and (ii) ongoing daily transactional fees derived as a negotiated percentage of the outstanding sharestransactional revenues earned by our merchant customers.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2021 were $294,326 as compared with $10,304 for the prior year period, an increase of $284,022. The increase is primarily a result of the Company’s common stock at that time.engagement of contract developers and the payroll expenses incurred in connection with the hiring of our full-time chief technology officer, all of whom were engaged in continued development of and improvements in our blockchain technology for payment processing.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2021 were $879,355 as compared with $220,260 for the prior year period, an increase of $659,095. The purchase price was evidenced byincrease is primarily a promissory note due May 12, 2019result of (i) legal fees incurred in connection with interest at 3% per annumcertain litigation costs; (ii) payroll expenses incurred in connection with the hiring of certain key management personnel; and secured by the purchased shares. The Company was not a party to this transaction. Mr. Yankowitz does not have any interest in or contract with Pacific Wave. PacificWave and Mr. Yankowitz(ii) stock-based compensation. We did not have any relationshipexpenditures for litigation-related legal fees, payroll expenses or stock-based compensation during the three months ended September 30, 2020.

For the Six Months Ended September 30, 2021 vs September 30, 2020

Revenues

During the six months ended September 30, 2021, we recorded revenues of $11,875 as a result of (i) the recognition of $7,500 of setup fee revenues on the amortization of deferred revenues of $20,000 recorded since March 31, 2021 in connection with the Companyexecution of contracts with two customers; and (ii) normally occurring service fee revenues of $4,375 with several customers. During the six months ended September 30, 2020, we did not generate any revenue and had not yet commenced commercial operations.

22

We anticipate that future revenues will continue to be generated from (i) fees charged in connection with the implementation of our blockchain technology; and (ii) ongoing daily transactional fees derived as a negotiated percentage of the transactional revenues earned by our merchant customers.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses for the six months ended September 30, 2021 were $650,762 as compared with $13,909 for the prior year period, an increase of $636,853. The increase is primarily a result of the engagement of contract developers and the payroll expenses incurred in connection with the hiring of our full-time chief technology officer, all of whom were engaged in continued development of and improvements in our blockchain technology for payment processing.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the six months ended September 30, 2021 were $1,730,010 as compared with $314,015 for the prior year period, an increase of $1,415,995. The increase is primarily a result of (i) legal fees incurred in connection with certain litigation costs; (ii) payroll expenses incurred in connection with the hiring of certain key management personnel; and (ii) stock-based compensation. We did not have any expenditures for litigation-related legal fees, payroll expenses or stock-based compensation during the six months ended September 30, 2020.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2021, we had cash of $205,336 as compared to $800,331 as of March 31, 2020.

During the six months ended September 30, 2021, we had net cash of $1,403,745 used in operating activities, which was composed primarily of (i) our net loss of $2,383,129 and (ii) increases in prepaid and other current assets of $13,779 which were primarily for legal fee retainers. The cash flows used in operating activities were partially offset by (i) stock-based compensation of $646,746 in connection with stock options granted pursuant to the aforementioned change-in-control transaction. On May 15, 2015, Mr. Yankowitz sold 10,000 shares at a purchase price2018 Stock Option Plan, and (ii) an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $0.50 per share ($5,000) to an unaffiliated purchaser.


At$288,029. During the conclusionsix months ended September 30, 2020, we had net cash of all$160,513 used in operating activities, which was composed of these transactions, PacificWaveour net loss of $327,924 and its Managing Director and sole owner, Henrik Rouf, were the beneficial ownersoffset by stock-based compensation of an aggregate of 1,001,666 shares of the Company’s common stock, which constituted 17.7% of the outstanding shares of common stock.




Henrik Rouf is Managing Director of PacificWave and also serves as Assistant Secretary of the Company. While PacificWave does not have a formal contract with the Company, it is expected to continue to provide consulting and investment banking services to the Company, in particular with respect to raising capital$162,000 for the Company and in identifying and evaluating potential acquisition candidates. PacificWave has indicated that it intends to use the Company as a platform for the acquisition of an operating company, and that it was currently in the process of evaluating potential acquisition target companies in the global environmental remediation and other market sectors. It is anticipated that any such acquisition, when consummated, would involve one or more of the following: (1) the issuance of additional150,000 shares of our common stock or other equity securitiesto a consultant.

During the six months ended September 30, 2021, we had net cash of $808,750 provided by financing activities as a result of the Companyissuance of 650,000 shares of our common stock to two private investors in connection with the ownersexercise of warrants which provided $682,500 in cash consideration; and (ii) the issuance of a convertible note payable providing net proceeds of $126,250.. During the six months ended September 30, 2020, we had net cash of $478,750 provided by financing activities as a result of the acquired company, resulting inissuance 478,750 shares of our common stock to a change of control; (2) an extraordinary corporate transaction, such as a merger, reorganization or liquidation, involving the Company; (3) a change in the present board of directors or management of the Company, including any plans or proposals to change the number or term of directors or to fill any existing vacancies on the board; (4) a material change in the present capitalization or dividend policy of the Company; (5) a material change in the present capitalization or dividend policy of the Company; (6) changes in the Company's charter, bylaws or instruments corresponding thereto or other actions which may impede the acquisition of control of the Company by any person; or (7) actions similar to any of those enumerated above.private investor.

Going Concern

The Company’s condensedOur financial statements have been presented on the basis that it iswe are a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. AtDuring the six months ended September 30, 2015, the Company did not have any business operations. The Company has experienced recurring operating losses2021, we reported a net loss of $2,383,129, which included non-cash stock-based compensation of $646,746, and negative operating cash flows and has financed its recent working capital requirements through the issuanceused in operating activities of equity securities, as well as borrowings from related parties. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had working capital of $48,939, primarily as a result of the May 12, 2015 transactions as described herein, and an accumulated deficit of $2,614,100.$1,403,745. As a result, management believes that there is substantial doubt about the Company’sour ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s abilityOn November 4, 2021, we completed a public offering of 6,666,667 shares of Common Stock and accompanying warrants to purchase 6,666,667 shares of Common Stock and raised $5,000,000 in gross proceeds. We will require additional financing in order to continue as a going concern is dependent uponto develop our product and execute on our business plan. However, there can be no assurances that we will be successful in raising the Company’s abilityadditional capital necessary to continue operations and execute on our business plan. Any potential future sale of equity or debt securities may result in dilution to our stockholders, and we cannot be certain that additional public or private financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we are required to raise additional capital andfinancing, but are unable to ultimately acquireobtain such financing, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or develop a commercially viable business. The Company’s condensed financial statementseliminate one or more aspects of our operations or business development activities.

23

Commitments

We do not includehave any adjustmentslong-term commitments as of September 30, 2021.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2021, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that mighthave, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Impact of COVID-19 on Our Business

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted, and may continue to result, fromin significant economic disruption despite progress made in the outcomedevelopment and distribution of vaccines. It has already disrupted global travel, supply chains and the labor market and adversely impacted global commercial activity. Considerable uncertainty still surrounds COVID-19, the evolution of its variants, its potential long-term economic effects, as well as the effectiveness of any responses taken by government authorities and businesses and of various efforts to inoculate the global population. The travel restrictions, limits on hours of operations and/or closures of non-essential businesses, and other efforts to curb the spread of COVID-19 have significantly disrupted business activity globally and there is uncertainty as to when these uncertainties.disruptions will fully subside.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements


In May 2014,Significant uncertainty continues to exist concerning the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09),Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. ASU 2014-09 also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. Based on the FASB’s Exposure Draft Update issued on April 29, 2015,Revenue from Contracts With Customers (Topic 606): Deferralimpact of the Effective Date, it is expected that ASU 2014-09 will now be effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Entities will be able to transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption.  The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have any impactCOVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 (ASU 2014-15),Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-10). ASU 2014-15 provides guidance as to management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concernour customers’ and to provide related footnote disclosures. In connection with preparing financial statements for each annualprospects’ business and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, consideredoperations in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). ASU 2014-15 is effectivefuture periods. Although our total revenues for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2014-15 will have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.




In January 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 (ASU 2015-01),Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20).ASU 2015-01 eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Subtopic 225-20, Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items, required that an entity separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions. Presently, an event or transaction is presumed to be an ordinary and usual activity of the reporting entity unless evidence clearly supports its classification as an extraordinary item. Paragraph 225-20-45-2 contains the following criteria that must both be met for extraordinary classification: (1) Unusual nature. The underlying event or transaction should possess a high degree of abnormality and be of a type clearly unrelated to, or only incidentally related to, the ordinary and typical activities of the entity, taking into account the environment in which the entity operates. (2) Infrequency of occurrence. The underlying event or transaction should be of a type that would not reasonably be expected to recur in the foreseeable future, taking into account the environment in which the entity operates. If an event or transaction meets the criteria for extraordinary classification, an entity is required to segregate the extraordinary item from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. The entity also is required to disclose applicable income taxes and either present or disclose earnings-per-share data applicable to the extraordinary item. ASU 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the guidance prospectively. A reporting entity also may apply the guidance retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2015-01 will have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02 (ASU 2015-02),Consolidation (Topic 810).ASU 2015-02 changes the guidance with respect to the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation mode. ASU 2015-02 affects the following areas:  (1) limited partnerships and similar legal entities; (2) evaluating fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider as a variable interest; (3) the effect of fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination; (4) the effect of related parties on the primary beneficiary determination; and (5) certain investment funds. ASU 2015-02 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the guidance in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. A reporting entity may apply the amendments in this guidance using a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. A reporting entity also may apply the amendments retrospectively. The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2015-02 will have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03 (ASU 2015-03),Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). ASU 2015-03 simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs and requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the new guidance. ASU 2015-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within that fiscal year. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. An entity is required to apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented is adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. Upon transition, an entity is required to comply with the applicable disclosures for a change in an accounting principle. These disclosures include the nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle, the transition method, a description of the prior-period information that has been retrospectively adjusted, and the effect of the change on the financial statement line items (i.e., debt issuance cost asset and the debt liability). The adoption of ASU 2015-03 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, authoritative guidance, if currently adopted, would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

Concentration of Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash. The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by investing its cash with high credit quality financial institutions.




Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company prepared its condensed financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management periodically evaluates the estimates and judgments made. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates as a result of different assumptions or conditions.

The following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements.


Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Accordingly, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected impact of differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.

The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In the event the Company was to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be credited to operations in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should the Company determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to operations in the period such determination was made.

Results of Operations

The Company has no revenue-generating operations at September 30, 2015.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

General and Administrative. For the threesix months ended September 30, 2015, general2021 were not materially impacted by COVID- 19, we believe our revenues may be negatively impacted in future periods until the effects of the pandemic have fully subsided and administrative expenses were $39,781, which consistedthe current macroeconomic environment has substantially recovered. The uncertainty related to COVID-19 may also result in increased volatility in the financial projections we use as the basis for estimates and assumptions used in our financial statements. We have adapted our operations to meet the challenges of professional fees of $16,703, filing fees of $8,970, rent of $10,740,this uncertain and other operating costs of $3,368.

For the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company incurred $450 of generalrapidly evolving situation, including establishing remote working arrangements for our employees, limiting non-essential business travel, and administrative expenses.


Cost of Pending Transaction. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred professional fees relatingcancelling or shifting our customer, employee, and industry events to a potential acquisition in the amount of $79,053.


Interest Expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, there was no interest expense. Interest expensevirtual-only format for the three months ended September 30, 2014foreseeable future. We have not received any government assistance from various relief packages available in countries where we operate.

Effects of $1,589 consisted of interest expense on an advance from a related party, which was paid on May 12, 2015.

Net Loss. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred a net loss of $118,834, as compared to a net loss of $2,039 for the three months ended September 30, 2014.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

General and Administrative. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, general and administrative expenses were $76,711, which consisted of professional fees of $37,453, filing fees of $14,939, rent of $19,140, and other operating costs of $5,179.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company incurred $1,442 of general and administrative expenses.


Cost of Pending Transaction. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred professional fees relating to a potential acquisitionCOVID-19 pandemic that may negatively impact our business in the amount of $79,053.


Interest Expense. For the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015, interest expense of $1,589 consisted of interest expense on an advance from a related party, which was paid on May 12, 2015. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 of $4,767 consisted of interest expensefuture periods include, but are not limited to: limitations on the same related party advance, which was paid on May 12, 2015.




Costability of our customers to Settle Contingent Claims. Forconduct their business, purchase our products and services, and make timely payments; curtailed consumer spending; deferred purchasing decisions; delayed consulting services implementations; labor shortages and decreases in product licenses revenues driven by channel partners. We will continue to actively monitor the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred a loss from settlement of contingent claims of $92,519, which consisted of amounts paid to settle debts to professionalsnature and related parties for which the Company was potentially liable. Such amounts were settled and paid in cash in connection with the change-in-control transaction that occurred on May 12, 2015.


Net Loss. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred a net loss of $249,872, as compared to a net loss of $6,209 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Liquidity and Capital Resources – September 30, 2015

The Company’s condensed financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At September 30, 2015, the Company did not have any business operations. The Company has experienced recurring operating losses and negative operating cash flows, and has financed its recent working capital requirements through the issuance of equity securities, as well as borrowings from related parties. As a result, management believes that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern (see “Going Concern” above).

At September 30, 2015, the Company had working capital of $48,939, as compared to a working capital deficit of $123,963 at December 31, 2014, an increase in working capital of $172,902 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. At September 30, 2015, the Company had cash of $101,811, as compared to $0 at December 31, 2014, an increase of $101,811 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. At September 30, 2015, the Company also had funds held in trust by attorneys of $0, as compared to $25,000 at December 31, 2014, a decrease of $25,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in working capital and cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was the result of a private placementextent of the Company’s common stockimpact to our business, operating results, and a capital contribution in May 2015 that generated net proceeds of $422,774.financial condition.

Operating Activities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, operating activities utilized cash of $240,054 to fund general and administrative expenses, the costs of a pending transaction, and a loss from the settlement of contingent claims. The Company did not have any operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Investing Activities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, investing activities generated cash of $25,000 from a decrease in funds held in trust by an attorney. The Company did not have any investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Financing Activities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, financing activities totaled $316,865, which consisted of the gross proceeds of $248,976 received from the sale of 4,979,524 shares of the Company’s common stock and a capital contribution of $175,000 in May 2015, less the payment of $1,202 for costs incurred relating to such stock sale, and the repayment of related party advances, including accrued interest, in the amount of $105,909. The Company did not have any financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At September 30, 2015, the Company did not have any transactions, obligations or relationships that could be considered off-balance sheet arrangements.





ITEM

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISKQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

ITEMItem 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURESControls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company carried outBased on an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of itsour management, consisting of itsour principal executive officer and principal financial officer (who is the same person), of the effectiveness of the Company’shave concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (asas defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) ofunder the Exchange Act (defined below)). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that,were not effective as of the end of the period covered in this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effectiveSeptember 30, 2021 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filedthat we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods specified in the SEC rules and isforms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’sour management, consisting of the Company’sincluding our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company madeBased on this determination becauseevaluation, our management concluded that, as of September 30, 2021, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective due to (i) insufficient segregation of duties in the Company didfinance and accounting functions due to limited personnel; and (ii) inadequate corporate governance policies. In the future, subject to working capital limitations, we intend to take appropriate and reasonable steps to make improvements to remediate these deficiencies.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have not timely file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forbeen any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the quarterlyExchange Act) during the fiscal period ended June 30, 2015.to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 

 

The Company’s management, consistingInherent Limitations of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures or its internal controls will prevent all error or fraud. the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the internal control system are met. Furthermore, the designBecause of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in allof any internal control systems,system, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. In addition, as conditions change over time, so too may the effectiveness of internal controls. However, management believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

24

 

(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management, consisting of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has determined that there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as that term is defined in Rules 13(a)-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during or subsequent to the end of the period covered in this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  However, as there was a change in the Company’s management in May 2015, new management is in the process of developing controls and procedures that are adequate to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, consisting of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer (who is the same person), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.





PART II -II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEMItem 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGSLegal Proceedings

Other than as set forth below, we are not the subject of any pending legal proceedings; and to the knowledge of management, no proceedings are presently contemplated against us by any federal, state or local governmental agency. Further, to the knowledge of management, no director or executive officer is party to any action in which any party has an interest adverse to us.

On September 9, 2013,October 8, 2020, we filed a lawsuit in the Company issued 91,791.96 sharesU.S. District Court for the Central District of common stock havingCalifornia against Joseph Page, our former director and chief technology officer. On January 13, 2021, the case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas Division. The causes of action include securities fraud under Federal and California law; fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment under California law; and violation of California Business and Professions Code §17200 et seq.

We are seeking injunctive and declaratory relief as well as damages of at least $5.1 million. On May 29, 2019, Mr. Page resigned from our board. After his resignation, we retained independent patent counsel to review our patent applications. In connection with this review, we discovered certain deficiencies in some of the applications and in their assignments to us. We determined that all of the applications had been abandoned. Based on this review, we decided to refile three of our applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which we did in May 2020. It is our belief that the three newly filed patent applications cover and/or disclose the same subject matter as we disclosed in the five original patent applications. In this case, our rights may be subject to any intervening patent applications made after the dates of the original applications. In the lawsuit, we are alleging that Mr. Page was aware of the abandonments when he assigned the patents to RBC, a fair value of $24,264 ($0.26434 per share)private corporation that he controlled, and that he failed to disclose to us the abandonments when we acquired RBC in exchange for consulting services to be provided by Red Rock Servicing, Inc. (“Red Rock”).  Previous managementshares of our Common Stock. In September 2021, Mr. Page voluntarily dismissed all of the Company determinedcounterclaims against the shareholders. We intend to vigorously contest these allegations.

On March 2, 2021, we filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Ellenhoff Grossman & Schole LLP (“EGS”) for negligence and legal malpractice, breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty. EGS had represented RBC prior to the Business Combination and represented us after the closing of the Business Combination through August 2019. In the litigation against Mr. Page, he has alleged that he provided information to an EGS partner that the contracted services were never performed,patent applications had been abandoned and demandedthat EGS failed to inform RBC and us of that fact. We are seeking damages and the return of such shares from Red Rock. The Company has issued stop-transfer instructions to its transfer agent, and has consistently excluded these shares from the reported total of its outstanding shares. The Company is currently engaged in a dispute regarding such shares with Red Rock and is indemnified with respect to such matter by the former controlling shareholders of the Company.  On November 4, 2015, the Company filed a civil action in the Third District Court, State of Utah, for a declaratory judgment that the consulting agreement was not valid and enforceable, for rescission of the agreement and the issuance of the shares, and for damages for fraud and negligent misrepresentation. The Company intends to cancel these shares upon their return.legal fees previously paid.


ITEMItem 1A. RISK FACTORSRisk Factors

Together with the risk factors below, the Risk Factors identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2021 continue to represent the most significant risks to the Company’s future results of operations and financial conditions, without further modification or amendment.

 

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS


Not applicable.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIESWe do not have any independent directors and may be unable to appoint any qualified independent directors.

 

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURESCurrently, the members of the Board of Directors are Gert Funk, Bennett Yankowitz and Peter Jensen, none of whom are “independent” as defined under national stock exchange rules. Therefore, all decisions of the Board of Directors will be made by persons who are not considered independent directors. If we seek to list our common stock on a national securities exchange, we will need to have a majority of the members of our board of directors be independent, but we may not be able to identify independent directors qualified to be on our board who are willing to serve. We do not currently have an audit committee and have not established independent oversight over our management and internal controls. Therefore, we are exposed to the risk that material misstatements or omissions caused by errors or fraud with respect to our financial statements or other disclosures may occur and not be detected in a timely manner or at all. In the event there are deficiencies or weaknesses in our internal controls, we may misreport our financial results or lose significant amounts due to misstatements caused by errors or fraud. These misstatements or acts of fraud could also cause our company to lose value and investors to lose confidence in us.

 

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATIONChanges in government regulation and industry standards applicable to the Internet and our business could decrease demand for our technologies and services or increase our costs.

 

Not applicable.Laws and regulations that apply to Internet communications, commerce and advertising are becoming more prevalent. These regulations could increase the costs of conducting business on the Internet and could decrease demand for our technologies and services. In the United States, federal and state laws have been enacted regarding copyrights, sending of unsolicited commercial email, user privacy, search engines, Internet tracking technologies, direct marketing, data security, children’s privacy, pricing, sweepstakes, promotions, intellectual property ownership and infringement, trade secrets, export of encryption technology, taxation and acceptable content and quality of goods. Other laws and regulations may be adopted in the future. Laws and regulations, including those related to privacy and use of personal information, are changing rapidly outside the United States as well, which may make compliance with such laws and regulations difficult, and which may negatively affect our ability to expand internationally. This legislation could: (i) hinder growth in the use of the Internet generally; (ii) decrease the acceptance of the Internet as a communications, commercial and advertising medium; (iii) reduce our revenue; (iv) increase our operating expenses; or (v) expose us to significant liabilities.

H.R. 3684, the infrastructure bill that passed the Senate in August 2021, contains a provision regarding reporting of cryptocurrency transactions to the Internal Revenue Service. Under the Senate version of the bill, brokers must report digital asset transactions to the Internal Revenue Service. The Senate bill also expands the definition of broker to include “any person who (for consideration) is responsible for regularly providing any service effectuating transfers of digital assets on behalf of another person.” The bill is being considered by the House and it is unclear if the bill will be passed by the House or otherwise signed into law. It is also unclear if the cryptocurrency reporting provision passed in the Senate bill would remain in the House bill or would be amended in some way. Should the provision become law, it is possible that RocketFuel may have obligations under the provision to report digital asset transactions to the Internal Revenue Service.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

We claimed exemption from registration under the Securities Act for the sales and issuances of securities in the following transactions under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and/or Regulations D and S promulgated thereunder, in that such sales and issuances (i) did not involve a public offering, or (ii) were made to non-U.S. Persons and otherwise complied with Rule 903 promulgated under the Securities Act, or (iii) were made pursuant to Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act, in that they were offered and sold either pursuant to written compensatory plans or pursuant to a written contract relating to compensation, as provided by Rule 701. All of the purchasers of unregistered securities for which we relied on Section 4(a)(2) and/or Regulation D represented that they were accredited investors as defined under the Securities Act. We claimed such exemption on the basis that (a) the purchasers in each case represented that they intended to acquire the securities for investment only and not with a view to the distribution thereof and that they either received adequate information about the registrant or had access, through employment or other relationships, to such information and (b) appropriate legends were affixed to the stock certificates issued in such transactions.

25

On May 1, 2020, we issued a warrant to a private investor to purchase 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock at $1.00 per share. The warrant expired on April 30, 2021. We also agreed that upon the full and timely exercise of this warrant, we would issue a second warrant for an additional 1,500,000 shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of $1.50 per share; this second warrant will have a term of 12 months from the date of issue. The first warrant was transferred to an affiliate of the private investor on November 17, 2021. From November 17, 2020 through April 20, 2021 the warrant holder exercised the first warrant providing for the issuance of 1,500,000 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, resulting in gross proceeds of $1,500,000. On April 26, we issued to the investor the second warrant, covering an additional 1,500,000 shares of our common stock, expiring April 26, 2022, with an exercise price of $1.50 per share.

On February 25, 2021, we entered into a common stock purchase agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) with Triton Funds, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Triton” or the “Selling Stockholder,” which term also includes Triton’s successors and assigns under the Stock Purchase Agreement and the Warrant). Under the Stock Purchase Agreement Triton, which is an unrelated third party, agreed to invest up to $1,000,000 through purchases of our Common Stock during the commitment period (which runs through December 31, 2022). During the commitment period, we may, in our sole discretion, deliver purchase notices to Triton stating the dollar amount of shares which we intend to sell to Triton, not to exceed $500,000 per purchase notice. The amount to be funded under a purchase notice will be the number of shares of Common Stock to be purchased multiplied by the greater of (i) $1.65 or (ii) 80 percent of the lowest closing price of our Common Stock within 15 business days prior to the closing date for the purchase. The closing date for each purchase is five business days following the date of the corresponding purchase notice. In connection with these transactions, we paid Triton an administrative fee of $15,000.

Triton’s obligation to purchase Common Stock is conditioned on certain factors including, but not limited to, our having an effective S-1 registration statement in effect for resale of the Common Stock being purchased and Triton’s ownership not exceeding 4.99% of our issued and outstanding shares at any time.

In connection with the Stock Purchase Agreement, we also issued to Triton warrants to purchase, in one or more instalments, 800,000 shares of our Common Stock (the “Warrants”) at an exercise price equal to the greater of (i) $1.65 per share or (ii) 80 percent of the average closing price of our Common Stock over the 90-calendar day period preceding the Warrant exercise date, subject to adjustments. The Warrants terminate on February 25, 2026. If, at any time after the initial effective date of the S-1 registration statement filed in connection with the Stock Purchase Agreement and during the exercise period of the Warrants, there is no effective registration statement covering the Selling Stockholder’s immediate resale of the shares underlying the exercise of the Warrants (the “Warrant Shares”), then Selling Stockholder may elect to receive Warrant Shares pursuant to a cashless exercise of the Warrants. On May 5, 2021, Triton exercised 50,000 Warrants for an aggregate purchase price of $82,500.

From January 1, 2018 through September 30, 2021, we granted stock options under our 2018 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended, to issue up to an aggregate of 5,600,595 shares of our common stock to our employees, directors, and consultants, at a weighted average exercise price of $1.08 per share.

These transactions were exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to Regulations D and S thereunder.

26

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit

No.

Description
3.1Conformed copy of Articles of Incorporation of RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc., as currently in effect - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed October 20, 2021.
3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed June 9, 2018.
10.1

Securities Purchase Agreement between Geneva Roth Remark Holdings, Inc. and RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc., dated August 4, 2021 - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed August 10, 2021.

10.2$130,000 Convertible Promissory Note between Geneva Roth Remark Holdings, Inc. and RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc., dated August 4, 2021 - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed August 10, 2021.
10.3Amended and Restated Subscription Agreement dated September 14, 2021 between the Company and G Kapital ApS - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed September 15, 2021.
31.1Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2Certification of the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INSXBRL Instance Document.
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CALXBRL Taxomony Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

27

 

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

SIGNATURES

A list of exhibits required

Pursuant to be filed as part of this report is set forth in the Index to Exhibits, which is presented elsewhere in this document, and is incorporated herein by reference.




SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc.

B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.

By:
/s/ Peter M. Jensen

(Registrant)

Peter M. Jensen

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  November 6, 2015

By:

(Principal Executive Officer)

By:/s/ BENNETT J. YANKOWITZ

Bennett J. Yankowitz

President and Treasurer

Bennett J. Yankowitz

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal ExecutiveFinancial and Financial /AccountingAccounting Officer)

Dated: November 19, 2021










INDEX TO EXHIBITS

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

Exhibit

Number

Description of Document

10.1

Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of May 7, 2015 between the Company and PacificWave Partners Limited, a Gibraltar company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2015.

10.2*

Sub-Lease Agreement entered into on November 1, 2015 by and between Mostofi & Company, LLP and B4MC Gold Mines, Inc.

31.1*

Officer’s Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*

Officer’s Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS**

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

28

* Filed herewith.

 **In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information on Exhibit No. 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed “furnished” herewith not “filed.”





23