UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

 

FORM 10-Q

 X.  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015

. TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 033-17773-NY

B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Nevada

87-0674571For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2022

OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from            to          

Commission file number: 033-17773-NY

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Nevada90-1188745
(State orof other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

incorporation or organization)201 Spear Street, Suite 1100

San Francisco, CA

Identification Number)

94105
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)

3651 Lindell Road, Suite D565(424)256-8560

Las Vegas, Nevada 89103

 (Address of principal executive offices)

(424) 256-8560

(Registrant’s telephone number,Telephone Number, including area code)Area Code)

Not applicableSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
NoneNone

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the precedingpast 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes No

Yes X.  No     .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes ☐ No

Yes     .  No X.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, (as defineda smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Act:

Large Accelerated Filer Accelerated Filer

Large accelerated filer       .Non-Accelerated Filer

Accelerated filer                        .Small Reporting Company

Non-accelerated filer         .

Smaller reporting company   X.Emerging Growth Company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantRegistrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes No

Yes X.  No     .

AsNumber of October 31, 2015, the Company had 5,665,485 shares of issuer’s common stock $0.001 par value, issued and outstanding.outstanding at August 18, 2022: 28,698,632.

Documents incorporated by reference: None







ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Page
Number

3

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1

Consolidated Financial Statements

3

Item 1. Condensed Financial Statements

4

Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2022 and March 31, 2022 (unaudited)

3

Condensed Balance Sheets (Unaudited) - September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014

4

CondensedConsolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) - Three Monthsfor the three months ended June 30, 2022 and Nine Months Ended

September 30, 2015 and 2014

2021 (unaudited)

5

4

Condensed Statement

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency) (Unaudited) - Nine Months Ended

Septemberfor the three months ended June 30, 2015

2022 and 2021 (unaudited)

6

5

Condensed

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - Nine Months Ended Septemberfor the three months ended June 30, 20152022 and 2014

2021 (unaudited)

7

6

Notes to CondensedConsolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) - Three Months and Nine Months Ended

September 30, 2015 and 2014

(unaudited)

8

7

Item 2. 2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

15

14

Item 3. 3

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures aboutAbout Market Risk

20

18

Item 4. 4

Controls and Procedures

20

18

PART II -

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

21

19

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

21

19

Item 2. 2

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

21

19

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

6

Exhibits

21

20

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Signatures

21

Item 5. Other Information

21

Item 6. Exhibits

21

SIGNATURES

22

 




PART I FINCANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1 Consolidated Financial Statements

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

  June 30, 2022  March 31, 2022 
       
ASSETS        
Current Assets:        
Cash $1,436,890  $2,634,794 
Restricted cash  

55,956

   

-

 
Accounts receivable  1,362   3,475 
Prepaid and other current assets  81,057   12,350 
Total current assets  1,575,265   2,650,619 
         
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $237,000 and $149,919, respectively  540,976   460,176 
         
Total Assets $2,116,241  $3,110,795 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $657,430  $487,200 
Payable to related party  47,679   11,277 
Deferred revenue  11,292   15,073 
Total current liabilities  716,401   513,550 
Total liabilities  716,401   513,550 
         
Stockholders’ equity:        
Preferred stock; $0.001 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; and 0 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2022 and March 31, 2022  -   - 
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 28,364,689 and 31,975,083 shares issued; 28,364,689 and 31,965,083 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2022 and March 31, 2022, respectively  28,365   31,975 
Additional paid in capital  11,492,762   11,214,820 
Accumulated deficit  (10,121,287)  (8,646,550)
Treasury stock, at cost  -   (3,000)
Total stockholders’ equity  1,399,840   2,597,245 
         
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $2,116,241  $3,110,795 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements  


Forward-Looking Statements

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

  Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
  June 30, 2022  June 30, 2021 
       
Revenue, net $8,132  $2,500 
         
Operating expenses:        
Research and development expenses  258,965   326,217 
General and administrative expenses  1,237,954   880,874 
Total operating expenses  1,496,919   1,207,091 
Loss from operations  (1,488,787)  (1,204,591)
         
Other income – Gain from legal settlement  540,059   - 
         
Loss before provision for income taxes  (948,728)  (1,204,591)
         
Provision for income taxes  -   - 
         
Net loss $(948,728) $(1,204,591)
         
Loss per common share:        
Basic and diluted $(0.03) $(0.05)
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding:        
Basic and diluted  31,205,000   24,868,416 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the Three Month Periods Ended June 30, 2021 and 2022

(Unaudited)

  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity 
  Common Stock Outstanding  Treasury Stock  Additional
Paid-in
  Accumulated  Total
Stockholders’
 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity 
Balance at March 31, 2021  24,438,416  $24,438   -  $-  $4,584,214  $(3,983,626) $625,026 
Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of common stock purchase warrants  550,000   550   -   -   581,950   

-

   582,500 
Stock-based compensation - employees and consultants option grants  -   

-

   -   -   316,896   

-

   316,896 
Net loss  

-

   

-

   -   -   

-

   (1,204,591)  (1,204,591)
Balance at June 30, 2021  24,988,416  $24,988   -  $-  $5,483,060  

$

(5,188,217) 

$

319,831 
                             
Balance at March 31, 2022  31,975,083  $31,975   (10,000) 

$

(3,000) 

$

11,214,820  

$

(8,646,550) 

$

2,597,245 
Stock-based compensation – employees and consultants option grants  

-

   

-

   -   -   291,382   -   291,382 
Cancellation of common stock  (3,610,394)  (3,610)  10,000   3,000   (13,440)  (526,009)  (540,059)
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   (948,728)  (948,728)
Balance as of June 30, 2022  28,364,689  $28,365   -  

$

-  

$

11,492,762  

$

(10,121,287) 

$

1,399,840 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

  Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
  June 30, 2022  June 30, 2021 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:        
Net loss $(948,728) $(1,204,591)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  87,081   - 
Stock based compensation  291,382   316,896 
Gain from legal settlement  (540,059)  - 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable  2,113   (10,000)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (68,707)  (55,000)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  170,230   88,000 
Payable to related party  36,402   (19,145)
Deferred revenue  (3,781)  7,500 
Net cash flows used in operating activities  (974,067)  (876,340)
         
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:        
Purchase of property and equipment  (5,393)  - 
Software development cost  (162,488)  - 
Net cash flows used in investing activities  (167,881)  - 
         
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:        
Proceeds from issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of common stock purchase warrants  -   582,500 
Net cash flows provided by financing activities  -   582,500 
Net change in cash and restricted cash  (1,141,948)  (293,840)
Cash and restricted cash at beginning of period  2,634,794   800,331 
Cash and restricted cash at end of period $1,492,846  $506,491 
         
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:        
Cash paid for interest $-  $- 
Cash paid for income taxes $-  $- 

 

2022

  

2021

 
Reconciliation of cash and restricted cash within the consolidated balance sheets to the amounts shown in the consolidated statements of cash flows above at June 30:      
       
Cash $1,436,890  $506,491 
Restricted cash  55,956   - 
Total cash and restricted cash $1,492,846  $506,491 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2022

(UNAUDITED)

1. Business

We (or the “Company”) provide cryptocurrency and other check-out and payment systems that securely automate and simplify the way online payment and shipping information is received by merchants from their customers. Our “one click” checkout solution is modeled on the “buy now” button on leading eCommerce sites. Our check-out systems are designed to enhance customers’ data protection, enabling consumers to pay for goods and services using cryptocurrencies or by direct transfers from their bank accounts without exposing spending credentials such as credit card data. At the same time, our check-out systems are designed to increase the speed, security and ease of use for both customers and merchants and include a merchant portal that provides detailed transactions and metrics about payments received by the merchant. Our system also includes a customer portal where shoppers are able to track their payments, configure payment defaults and connect with various cryptocurrency exchanges and banks to facilitate payment to merchants. Merchants are able to integrate a unique pop-up user interface that allows customers to pay directly from their eCommerce checkout page with no need to redirect to another website or web page.

Our corporate headquarters are located in San Francisco, California.

 

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. For example, statements regarding the Company’s financial position, business strategy and other plans and objectives for future operations, and related assumptions and predictions, are all forward-looking statements. These statements are generally accompanied by words such as “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “potential(ly),” “continue,” “forecast,” “predict,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect” or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology. The Company believes that the assumptions and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, based on information available to it on the date hereof, butOn May 12, 2022, the Company cannot provide assurances that these assumptions and expectations will proveincorporated a wholly owned subsidiary, RocketFuel (BVI) Ltd., in the British Virgin Islands. The subsidiary is formed to have been correct or thatbe the issuer of digital tokens in connection with our planned loyalty program. On May 17, 2022, the Company incorporated another wholly owned subsidiary, RocketFuel A/S, in Denmark. This subsidiary will take any action that the Company may presently be planning. However, these forward-looking statements are inherently subjectengage in our B2B cross border settlement program. The subsidiary received a Virtual Asset Services Provider (VASP) license in July 2022, allowing it to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual results or experience may differ materially from those expected, anticipated or impliedoffer a variety of crypto-based services in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contributeEU. Both subsidiaries have not commenced commercial operations as of June 30, 2022.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Other than as discussed herein, our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to such differences include, but are not limited to, available cash, competition, and market and general economic factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensedaudited financial statements and notes theretoas of March 31, 2022 which are included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Company’sour Annual Report on Form 10-K foras filed with the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014. The Company does not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect new information, future events or otherwise.SEC on July 15, 2022.


















PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)


 

 

September 30, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash

 

$

101,811

 

 

$

Funds held in trust by attorney

 

 

 

 

 

25,000

Prepaid expenses

 

 

9,600

 

 

 

Due from related parties

 

 

3,479

 

 

 

Total current assets

 

 

114,890

 

 

 

25,000

Total assets

 

$

114,890

 

 

$

25,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses, including $1,570 and $3,434 to related parties at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively

 

$

65,951

 

 

$

8,666

Advances payable to related party, including accrued interest of $34,388 at December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

140,297

Total current liabilities

 

 

65,951

 

 

 

148,963

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity (deficiency):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized – 750,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding – 5,665,485 shares and 685,961 shares at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively

 

 

5,665

 

 

 

686

Additional paid-in capital

 

 

2,657,374

 

 

 

2,239,579

Accumulated deficit

 

 

(2,614,100)

 

 

 

(2,364,228)

Total stockholders’ equity (deficiency)

 

 

48,939

 

 

 

(123,963)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficiency)

 

$

114,890

 

 

$

25,000

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.







B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

September 30,

 

 

September 30,

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

Revenues

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

General and administrative, including $8,759 and $450 to related parties for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $11,819 and $1,442 to related parties for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively

 

 

39,781

 

 

 

450

 

 

 

76,711

 

 

 

1,442

Costs of pending transaction

 

 

79,053

 

 

 

 

 

 

79,053

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

 

 

118,834

 

 

 

450

 

 

 

155,764

 

 

 

1,442

Loss from operations

 

 

(118,834)

 

 

 

(450)

 

 

 

(155,764)

 

 

 

(1,442)

Interest expense to related party

 

 

 

 

 

(1,589)

 

 

 

(1,589)

 

 

 

(4,767)

Cost to settle contingent claims, including $50,519 to related parties

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(92,519)

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(118,834)

 

 

$

(2,039)

 

 

$

(249,872)

 

 

$

(6,209)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss per common share – basic and diluted

 

$

(0.02)

 

 

$

(0.05)

 

 

$

(0.08)

 

 

$

(0.14)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic and diluted

 

 

5,665,485

 

 

 

44,961

 

 

 

3,276,043

 

 

 

44,961

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.




























5



B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)

(Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

Stockholders’

Equity

(Deficiency)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

 Deficit

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

 

685,961

 

$

686

 

$

2,239,579

 

 $

(2,364,228)

 

$

(123,963)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock sold in private placement

 

 

4,979,524

 

 

4,979

 

 

243,997

 

 

 

 

248,976

 

Contribution to capital made in connection with the private placement

 

 

 

 

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

 

175,000

 

Costs related to private placement

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,202)

 

 

 

 

(1,202)

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(249,872)

 

 

(249,872)

 

Balance, September 30, 2015

 

 

5,665,485

 

$

5,665

 

$

2,657,374

 

 $

(2,614,100)

 

$

114,890

 

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.



















B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 

 

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(249,872)

 

 

$

(6,209)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) decrease in -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prepaid expenses

 

 

(9,600)

 

 

 

Due from related parties

 

 

(3,479)

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

 

57,285

 

 

 

1,442

Accrued interest to related party

 

 

(34,388)

 

 

 

4,767

Net cash used in operating activities

 

 

(240,054)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease in funds held in trust by attorney

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

Net cash provided by investing activities

 

 

25,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from private placement

 

 

248,976

 

 

 

Capital contributed in connection with private placement

 

 

175,000

 

 

 

Payment of private placement costs

 

 

(1,202)

 

 

 

Repayment of related party advances

 

 

(105,909)

 

 

 

Net cash provided by financing activities

 

 

316,865

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net increase

 

 

101,811

 

 

 

Balance at beginning of period

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

 

$

101,811

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for -

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

35,977

 

 

$

Income taxes

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 




See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.









B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

1. Basis of Presentation

The condensedaccompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information pursuant to Rule 8-03 of B4MC Gold Mines, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), at September 30, 2015,Regulation S-X. Accordingly, these unaudited financial statements do not include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, are unaudited.complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, of the Company,accompanying unaudited financial statements include all adjustments (including(consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) have been made that are, which we consider necessary, to present fairly thefor a fair presentation of those financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2015, and thestatements. The results of its operations for the three months and nine months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20152022 and 2014, and its cash flows for the ninethree months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2015 and 2014. Operating results for the interim periods presented are2022 may not necessarily be indicative of the results tothat may be expected for a fullany succeeding quarter or for the entire fiscal year. The condensedMarch 31, 2022 balance sheet at December 31, 2014 has beenincluded herein was derived from the Company’s audited financial statements at such date.

The condensed financial statements and related notes have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and other information included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended Decemberas of that date. These unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements as of March 31, 2014,2022 as filed with the SEC.


OnSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on July 15, 2015, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles2022.

Principles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada providing for a one-for-fifty reverse split of its outstanding shares of common stock effective August 21, 2015. All share and per share amounts included in theConsolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect this reverse stock split for all periods presented. The authorized shares ofinclude the Company’s common stock were not adjusted as a result the reverse stock split.

2. Organization and Business Operations


Change-in-Control Transaction


On May 12, 2015, the Company sold 4,979,524 newly issued shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to PacificWave Partners Limited, a Gibraltar Company (“PacificWave”), at a price of $0.05 per share, representing aggregate gross proceeds of $248,976. Of this amount, $225,000 was paid to certain creditors and claimantsaccounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries in exchange for releasesaccordance with consolidation accounting guidance. The Company’s subsidiaries consist of such outstanding claims,RocketFuel Blockchain Company (RBC) (incorporated in Nevada), RocketFuel A/S (incorporated in Denmark), and RocketFuel (BVI) (incorporated in the British Virgin Islands), the latter two of which were incorporated during the quarter ended June 30, 2022. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Accounting Estimates

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and judgments, which are evaluated on an ongoing basis, and that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the remaining $23,976reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that it believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the amounts of revenues and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates and judgments.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash includes cash on hand. We consider all highly-liquid, temporary cash investments with a maturity date of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

In relation to the Company’s incorporation of a subsidiary in Denmark, a cash deposit of $55,956 was placed inmade into an escrow and was subjectaccount controlled by a legal firm. This cash is not available to release pending the fulfillment of certain conditions.


Simultaneous with the purchasefund immediate or general business use until it is released from escrow into an operating cash account of the above described shares of common stock, PacificWave purchased from Elwood Shepard,Denmark subsidiary. Until this release occurs, the Company's principal shareholder at the time, 520,476 shares ofcash is restricted in nature and is separately disclosed on the Company’s outstanding sharesconsolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of common stock, representing 75.9% of the outstanding shares prior to the issuance of the newly issued shares. The purchase price of such shares was $26,024, which amount was deposited into escrow and will be disbursed in the same manner and under the same conditions as the amount deposited into escrow from the purchase price of the Company's newly issued common shares.cash flows.


In that all conditions were met, all amounts deposited into escrow were disbursed pursuant to the terms of the escrow in July 2015.ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.


NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

At the closing of the purchase of the above described shares, PacificWave contributed $175,000 in cash to the capital of the Company, which was recorded as a credit to additional paid-in capital.JUNE 30, 2022


(UNAUDITED)

At the closing of the transaction on May 12, 2015, PacificWave transferred 1,000,000 of the Company’s common shares acquired as described herein to three non-U.S. resident accredited investors at a price of $0.50 per share ($500,000 in aggregate). These funds were utilized to effectuate the change-in-control transaction.

Software Development Costs

The Company was not a party to any of these transactions.




At the closing on May 12, 2015, PacificWave transferred 2,698,334 shares toaccounts for software development costs in accordance with ASC 350-40. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred, except for certain persons and entities providing servicescosts which are capitalized in connection with the transactiondevelopment of its internal-use software and website. These capitalized costs are primarily related to the application software that is hosted by the Company and accessed by its customers through the Company’s website. In addition, the Company capitalizes certain general and administrative costs related to the customization and development of our internal business systems. Costs incurred in the preliminary stages of development are expensed as follows: (i) 466,667 shares (constituting 8.2%incurred. Once an application has reached the development stage, internal and external costs, if direct and incremental, are capitalized until the software is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. Capitalization ceases upon completion of all substantial testing performed to ensure the product is ready for its intended use. The Company also capitalizes costs related to specific upgrades and enhancements of internal-use software when it is probable that the expenditures will result in additional functionality. Maintenance and training costs are expensed as incurred. Capitalized internal use software costs are recorded as part of property and equipment and are amortized on a straight-line basis over an estimated useful life of two years.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the outstanding shares)assets, which is three years for the Company. Maintenance and repairs are charged to Allan Kronborg, a citizen of Denmark; (ii) a total of 966,667 shares (constituting 17.1%operations as incurred. Significant improvements are capitalized and depreciated over the useful life of the outstanding shares) split among PacificWave Partners Europe sarl, PacificWave Partners UK Europe Ltd., Richway Finance Ltd.assets. Gains or losses on disposition or retirement of property and Anarholl Ltd., allequipment are recognized in operating expenses.

The Company reviews the carrying value of property and equipment for impairment whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable from the estimated future cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. In cases where undiscounted expected future cash flows are less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to an amount by which are entities affiliated with Henrik Oerbekker, a citizen of Denmark; and (iii) a total of 1,265,000 shares (constituting 22.3%the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the outstanding shares)related assets. The factors considered by management in performing this assessment include current operating results, trends and prospects, the manner in which the property is used, the effects of obsolescence, demand, competition, and other economic factors.

Revenue Recognition

During March 2021 we commenced commercial operations. Our revenues will be generated from (i) fees charged in connection with the implementation of our blockchain technology; and (ii) ongoing daily transactional fees derived as a negotiated percentage of the transactional revenues earned by our merchant customers.

Our revenue recognition policy follows the guidance from Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, “Revenue Recognition,” and Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) which provides guidance on the recognition, presentation, and disclosure of revenue in consolidated financial statements. We determine revenue recognition through the following steps: (i) identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer; (ii) identification of the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determination of the transaction price; (iv) allocation of the transaction price to nine non-U.S. resident personsthe performance obligations in the contract and entities.  Effective September 10, 2015, Anarholl Ltd. gifted 126,667 shares to two unaffiliated purchasers in(v) recognition of revenue when a private transaction, reducing theperformance obligation is satisfied. Collectability is assessed based on a number of factors, including the creditworthiness of a client, the size and nature of a client’s website and transaction history. Amounts billed or collected in excess of revenue recognized are included as deferred revenue. An example of this deferred revenue would be arrangements where clients request or are required by us to pay in advance of delivery.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

Earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares beneficially owned by Mr. Oerbekkeroutstanding during the reporting period. Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to 840,000basic earnings per share, except the weighted average number of common shares (constituting 14.8%outstanding are increased to include additional shares from the assumed exercise of share options, if dilutive. The dilutive effect, if any, of convertible instruments or warrants is calculated using the treasury stock method. There are no outstanding dilutive instruments as the outstanding convertible instruments, stock options and warrants would be anti-dilutive if converted or exercised for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021.

The following table summarizes the securities that were excluded from the diluted per share calculation because the effect of including these potential shares was antidilutive due to the Company’s net loss position even though the exercise price could be less than the average market price of the outstanding shares).  common shares:

Schedule of Anti-dilutive Securities Excluded from Diluted Per Share Calculation

  June 30, 2022  June 30, 2021 
Stock options – vested and exercisable  2,735,290   1,388,327 
Warrants  10,665,982   2,515,982 
Total potential dilution  13,401,272   3,904,309 

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2022

(UNAUDITED)

Stock-based Compensation

The Company was notapplies the provisions of ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation, (“ASC 718”) which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all stock-based awards made to employees, including employee stock options, in the statements of operations.

For stock options issued to employees and members of the Board of Directors (the “Board) for their services, the Company estimates the grant date fair value of each option using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model requires management to make assumptions with respect to the expected term of the option, the expected volatility of the common stock consistent with the expected life of the option, risk-free interest rates and expected dividend yields of the common stock. For awards subject to service-based vesting conditions, including those with a partygraded vesting schedule, the Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense equal to anythe grant date fair value of stock options on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting term. Forfeitures are recorded as they are incurred as opposed to being estimated at the time of grant and revised.

Pursuant to Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-07, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Non-employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, the Company accounts for stock options issued to non-employees for their services in accordance with ASC 718. The Company uses valuation methods and assumptions to value the stock options that are in line with the process for valuing employee stock options noted above.

Income Taxes

We are required to file federal and state income tax returns in the United States. The preparation of these transactions.


Effective May 12, 2015, Elwood Shepard,tax returns requires us to interpret the Company’s sole officerapplicable tax laws and director atregulations in effect in such jurisdictions, which could affect the amount of tax paid by us. In consultation with our tax advisors, we base our tax returns on interpretations that time, resigned,are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The tax returns, however, are subject to routine reviews by the various federal and Bennett J. Yankowitz was appointedstate taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which we file tax returns. As part of these reviews, a taxing authority may disagree with respect to the income tax positions taken by us (“uncertain tax positions”) and, therefore, may require us to pay additional taxes. As required under applicable accounting rules, we accrue an amount for our estimate of additional income tax liability, including interest and penalties, which we could incur as the Company’s sole director and as its President, Secretary and Treasurer. In conjunction with the aforementioned transactions with PacificWave, on May 12, 2015, Mr. Yankowitz purchased from PacificWave 800,000 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase price of $40,000 ($0.05 per share), reflecting approximately 14.1%a result of the outstanding sharesultimate or effective resolution of the Company’s common stock at that time.uncertain tax positions. We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributed to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences and carry-forwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The purchase price was evidenced by a promissory note due May 12, 2019 with interest at 3% per annumeffect on deferred tax assets and secured by the purchased shares. The Company was not a party to this transaction. Mr. Yankowitz does not have any interest in or contract with Pacific Wave. PacificWave and Mr. Yankowitz did not have any relationship with the Company prior to the aforementioned change-in-control transaction. On May 15, 2015, Mr. Yankowitz sold 10,000 shares at a purchase priceliabilities of $0.50 per share ($5,000) to an unaffiliated purchaser.


At the conclusion of all of these transactions, PacificWave and its Managing Director and sole owner, Henrik Rouf, were the beneficial owners of an aggregate of 1,001,666 shares of the Company’s common stock, which constituted 17.7% of the outstanding shares of common stock.

Business

The Company was organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, on April 2, 1987, as BK Ventures. The Company was organized to create a corporate vehicle to seek and acquire a business opportunity. In June 2000, the Company reincorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. On October 10, 2013, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to B4MC Gold Mines, Inc. The Company is engaged in efforts to identify an operating company to acquire or merge with through an equity-based exchange transaction that would likely result in a change in controltax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts expected to be realized.

In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the Company. Asdeferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the Company’s planned principalgeneration of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.

Impact of COVID-19 on Our Business

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted, and may continue to result, in significant economic disruption despite progress made in the development and distribution of vaccines. It has already disrupted global travel, supply chains and the labor market and adversely impacted global commercial activity. Considerable uncertainty still surrounds COVID-19, the evolution of its variants, its potential long-term economic effects, as well as the effectiveness of any responses taken by government authorities and businesses and of various efforts to inoculate the global population. The travel restrictions, limits on hours of operations and/or closures of non-essential businesses, and other efforts to curb the spread of COVID-19 have significantly disrupted business activity globally and there is uncertainty as to when these disruptions will fully subside.

Significant uncertainty continues to exist concerning the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our customers’ and prospects’ business and operations in future periods. Although our total revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2022 were not materially impacted by COVID- 19, we believe our revenues may be negatively impacted in future periods until the effects of the pandemic have fully subsided and the current macroeconomic environment has substantially recovered. The uncertainty related to COVID-19 may also result in increased volatility in the financial projections we use as the basis for estimates and assumptions used in our financial statements. We have adapted our operations to meet the challenges of this uncertain and rapidly evolving situation, including establishing remote working arrangements for our employees, limiting non-essential business travel, and cancelling or shifting our customer, employee, and industry events to a virtual-only format for the foreseeable future. We have not yet commenced, the Company activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including the need to obtain additional financing, as described below.received any government assistance from various relief packages available in countries where we operate.


Henrik Rouf is Managing Director of PacificWave and also serves as Assistant SecretaryEffects of the Company. While PacificWave doesCOVID-19 pandemic that may negatively impact our business in future periods include, but are not limited to: limitations on the ability of our customers to conduct their business, purchase our products and services, and make timely payments; curtailed consumer spending; deferred purchasing decisions; delayed consulting services implementations; labor shortages and decreases in product licenses revenues driven by channel partners. We will continue to actively monitor the nature and extent of the impact to our business, operating results, and financial condition.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other standard setting bodies that may have an impact on our accounting and reporting. We believe that such recently issued accounting pronouncements and other authoritative guidance for which the effective date is in the future either will not have a formal contract with the Company, it is expectedan impact on our accounting or reporting or that such impact will not be material to continue to provide consultingour financial position, results of operations and investment banking services to the Company, in particular with respect to raising capital for the Company and in identifying and evaluating potential acquisition candidates. PacificWave has indicated that it intends to use the Company as a platform for the acquisition of an operating company, and that it was currently in the process of evaluating potential acquisition target companies in the global environmental remediation and other market sectors. It is anticipated that any such acquisition,cash flows when consummated, would involve one or more of the following: (1) the issuance of additional common stock or other equity securities of the Company to the owners of the acquired company, resulting in a change of control; (2) an extraordinary corporate transaction, such as a merger, reorganization or liquidation, involving the Company; (3) a change in the present board of directors or management of the Company, including any plans or proposals to change the number or term of directors or to fill any existing vacancies on the board; (4) a material change in the present capitalization or dividend policy of the Company; (5) a material change in the present capitalization or dividend policy of the Company; (6) changes in the Company's charter, bylaws or instruments corresponding thereto or other actions which may impede the acquisition of control of the Company by any person; or (7) actions similar to any of those enumerated above.implemented.

3. Going Concern

The Company’s condensedOur consolidated financial statements have been presented on the basis that it iswe are a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At SeptemberWe incorporated our business on January 12, 2018, the date of our inception, and commenced commercial operations in March 2021. During the three months ended June 30, 2015,2022 and 2021, we reported a net loss of $948,728 and $1,204,591, respectively, which included as a component of general and administrative expenses in the Company did not have any business operations. The Company has experienced recurring operating lossesstatements of operations a non-cash stock-based compensation charge of $291,382 and negative operating$316,896, respectively, and cash flows used in operating activities during the three months ended June 30, 2022 and has financed its recent working capital requirements through the issuance2021 of equity securities, as well as borrowings from related parties. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had working capital of $48,939, primarily as a result of the May 12, 2015 transactions as described herein,$974,067 and an accumulated deficit of $2,614,100. As a result, management believes that there is$876,340, respectively. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately acquire or develop a commercially viable business. The Company’s condensedconsolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.this uncertainty.




3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Concentration of Risk

Financial instrumentsWe will require additional financing to continue to develop our product and execute on our business plan. However, there can be no assurances that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash. The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by investing its cash with high credit quality financial institutions.


Pending Transaction Costs

Due to the inherent uncertainty associated with the successful completion of a potential acquisition transaction, transaction costs, consisting primarily of fees to professionals, are expensed as incurred. Pending transaction costs were $79,053 for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015.


Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Accordingly, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected impact of differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.

The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In the event the Company was to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be credited to operations in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should the Company determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its deferred tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to operations in the period such determination was made.

The Company’s effective tax rate is different from the federal statutory rate of 35% due primarily to operating losses that receive no tax benefit as a result of a valuation allowance recorded for such losses.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had federal tax net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $154,000. The federal tax loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2020, if not previously utilized.

Pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Sections 382 and 383, use of the Company’s net operating loss and credit carryforwards may be limited if a cumulative change in ownership of more than 50% occurs within any three-year period since the last ownership change. The Company may have a change in control under these Sections. However, the Company does not anticipate performing a complete analysis of the limitation on the annual use of the net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards until the time that it projects itwe will be ablesuccessful in raising the additional capital necessary to utilize these tax attributes.

As of Decembercontinue operations and execute on our business plan. During the year ended March 31, 2014,2022, we raised $882,500 through the Company does not have any unrecognized tax benefits related to various federal and state income tax matters.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has in the past issued grantsexercise by certain investors of common stock which are measured at the grant date fair valuepurchase warrants and chargedcompleted a public offering of 6,666,667 shares of Common Stock and accompanying warrants to operations over the vesting period (if any).


The Company maypurchase 6,666,667 shares of Common Stock and raised approximately $4.4 million in the future issue stock options to officers, directors and consultants for services rendered. Options will vest and expire according to terms established at the grant date.

The Company will account for stock-based payments to officers and directors by measuring the cost of services received in exchange for equity awards based on the grant date fair valueproceeds, net of the awards, withissuance costs. We have used and plan to continue using the cost recognized as compensation expense in the Company’s financial statements on a straight-line basis over the vesting periodnet proceeds of the awards.

The Company will account for stock-based paymentspublic offering and warrant exercise to consultants by determiningrecruit key management and operational personnel, to retain software and blockchain developers and to develop our blockchain based check-out solution. Management believes the valuefunding from the public offering, the exercise of the common stock compensation based upon the measurement date at either (a) the date at which a performance commitment is reached or (b) at the date at which the necessary performance to earn the equity instruments is complete.

Options granted to outside consultants will be revalued each reporting period to determine the amount to be recorded as an expense in the respective period. As the options vest, they will be valued on each vesting date and an adjustment will be recorded for the difference between the value already recordedpurchase warrant, and the then current value on the date of vesting.




The fair value of stock options granted will be estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

Earnings Per Share

The Company’s computation of earnings per share (“EPS”) includes basicgrowth strategy actions executed and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is measured as the income (loss) availableplanned for execution could contribute to common stockholders divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is similarour ability to basic EPS but presents the dilutive effect on a per share basis of potential common shares (such as common shares issuable pursuant to convertible debt, options and/or warrants) as if they had been converted at the beginning of the periods presented, or issuance date, if later. Potential common shares that have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e., those that increase income per share or decrease loss per share) are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS.

Loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the respective periods. Basic and diluted loss per common share are the same for all periods presented, as there were no convertible debt, options or warrants outstanding duringmitigate any of the periods presented.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The authoritative guidance with respect to fair value established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels, and requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of three categories, as presented below. Disclosuresubstantial doubt as to transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, and activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, is also required.

Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for an identical asset or liability that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 1 inputs include active-exchange traded securities and exchange-based derivatives.

Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, which are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include fixed income securities, non-exchange based derivatives, mutual funds, and fair-value hedges.

Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data for the asset or liability which requires the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 3 inputs include infrequently-traded non-exchange-based derivatives and commingled investment funds, and are measured using present value pricing models.

The Company determines the level in the fair value hierarchy within which each fair value measurement falls in its entirety, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. In determining the appropriate levels, the Company performs an analysis of the assets and liabilities at each reporting period end.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain comparative figures in 2014 have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications were immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate.




Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09),Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current GAAP and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. ASU 2014-09 also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. Based on the FASB’s Exposure Draft Update issued on April 29, 2015,Revenue from Contracts With Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, it is expected that ASU 2014-09 will now be effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Entities will be able to transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption.  The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 (ASU 2014-15),Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-10). ASU 2014-15 provides guidance as to management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’sour ability to continue as a going concernconcern.

4. Property, Plant & Equipment

The Company’s property, plant and equipment assets are comprised of the following:

Schedule of Property Plant And Equipment

  Useful Life June 30, 2022  March 31, 2022 
Capitalized software development costs 2 years $749,188  $586,700 
Computer equipment 3 years  28,788   23,395 
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization    (237,000)  (149,919)
Property and equipment, net   $540,976  $460,176 

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2022

(UNAUDITED)

Capitalized software development costs represent the costs incurred during the development stage, when direct and incremental internal and external costs, are capitalized until the software is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. The Company also capitalizes costs related to provide related footnote disclosures. In connection with preparing financial statements for each annualspecific upgrades and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issuedenhancements of internal-use software when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entityexpenditures will be unableresult in additional functionality.

Depreciation and amortization expenses amount to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). ASU 2014-15 is effective$87,081 and $nil for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016,three months ended June 30, 2022 and for annual periods2021, respectively.

5. Related Party Transactions

During the three months ended June 30, 2022 and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2014-15 will have any impact on the Company’s2021, our chief financial statement presentation or disclosures.

In January 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 (ASU 2015-01),Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20).ASU 2015-01 eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Subtopic 225-20, Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items, required that an entity separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions. Presently, an event or transaction is presumed to be an ordinary and usual activity of the reporting entity unless evidence clearly supports its classification as an extraordinary item. Paragraph 225-20-45-2 contains the following criteria that must both be met for extraordinary classification: (1) Unusual nature. The underlying event or transaction should possess a high degree of abnormality and be of a type clearly unrelated to, or only incidentally related to, the ordinary and typical activities of the entity, taking into account the environment in which the entity operates. (2) Infrequency of occurrence. The underlying event or transaction should be of a type that would not reasonably be expected to recur in the foreseeable future, taking into account the environment in which the entity operates. If an event or transaction meets the criteria for extraordinary classification, an entity is required to segregate the extraordinary item from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. The entity also is required to disclose applicable income taxes and either present or disclose earnings-per-share data applicable to the extraordinary item. ASU 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the guidance prospectively. A reporting entity also may apply the guidance retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permittedofficer was affiliated with legal counsel who provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2015-01 will have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.




In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02 (ASU 2015-02),Consolidation (Topic 810).ASU 2015-02 changes the guidanceus with respect to the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types ofgeneral legal entities. Allservices (the “Affiliate”). We recorded legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation mode. ASU 2015-02 affects the following areas:  (1) limited partnerships and similar legal entities; (2) evaluating fees paid to a decision maker or a service providerthe Affiliate of $58,058 and $24,160 for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. As of June 30, 2022 and March 31, 2022, we had $47,679 and $11,277, respectively, payable to the Affiliate.

6. Deferred Revenue

We enter into certain contracts typically having initial one-year terms which define the scope of services to be provided. These contracts can include agreed-upon setup fees during the initial one-year term, which setup fees are recorded as a variable interest; (3)deferred revenue and amortized ratably over the effectinitial one-year term. During the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, we recorded revenues of fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination; (4) the effect of related parties on the primary beneficiary determination;$8,132 and (5) certain investment funds. ASU 2015-02 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years,$2,500, respectively. Deferred revenue was $11,292 and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the guidance in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected$15,073 as of the beginningJune 30, 2022 and March 31, 2022, respectively.

7. Stockholders’ Equity

Cancellations of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. A reporting entity may apply the amendments in this guidance usingStock:

On October 6, 2021, we entered into a modified retrospective approach by recordingcontract with one customer having a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. A reporting entity also may apply the amendments retrospectively. The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2015-02 will have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03 (ASU 2015-03),Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). ASU 2015-03 simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs and requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deductionone-year term from the carrying amountdate of execution that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the new guidance. ASU 2015-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within that fiscal year. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. An entity is required to apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented is adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. Upon transition, an entity is required to comply with the applicable disclosures for a change in an accounting principle. These disclosures include the nature of and reasonprovided for the change in accounting principle, the transition method, a description of the prior-period information that has been retrospectively adjusted, and the effect of the change on the financial statement line items (i.e., debt issuance cost asset and the debt liability). The adoption of ASU 2015-03 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, authoritative guidance, if currently adopted, would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

4. Rescinded Acquisition of Mining Assets


On September 3, 2013, the Company and Avidity Holdings LLC, a Utah limited liability company ("Avidity"), entered into an assignment to acquire six unpatented mining claims in Nye County, Nevada, in consideration of the Company’s issuance of 136,208.0410,000 shares of our common stock valued at $36,004 ($0.26434$1.00 per share)share in consideration of being an early adopter of our blockchain technology. In March 2022, in settlement of a customer dispute, we repurchased the 10,000 shares of stock issued in October 2021 for $3,000. In October 2014,During the Companythree months ended June 30, 2022, the 10,000 shares were cancelled.

On June 7, 2022, we entered into a Rescission of Assignmentsettlement agreement in the legal proceedings with Avidity, whereby the mining claims were returned to Avidity in exchange for the return of the shares of the Company’s common stock.


On September 6, 2013, the CompanyJoseph Page,our former director and its majority shareholder, Elwood Shepard, entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Shannon Anderson and Herbert Christopherson (the “Sellers”), pursuant to which the Company purchased two parcels of real property located in Mineral County, Montana, and several items of mining machinery and equipment from the Sellers in consideration of 1,092,000 shares of common stock valued at $285,480 ($0.26143 per share), and assumed debt of $109,443. On May 22, 2014, a Mutual Rescission Agreement was entered into between the parties, whereby the real property, mining machinery and equipment were returned to the Sellers in exchange for 951,000 of the 1,092,000chief technology officer, as defendant, whereunder Page surrendered 3,600,394 shares of the Company’s common stock. The 1,092,000In connection with this settlement, we recognized a gain of $540,059, calculated based on the Company’s share price of $0.15 per share on the date of settlement of the legal proceedings. This gain was recorded in other income for the three months ended June 30, 2022 in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. Immediately after these shares were transferred to the Company, the 3,600,394 shares were cancelled and we recorded cancellation of these treasury shares for the three months ended June 30, 2022.

As of June 30, 2022, and March 31, 2022, we had 28,364,689 shares and 31,965,083 shares of our common stock had not beenoutstanding, respectively.

Warrants:

As of June 30, 2022, the total outstanding warrants to purchase of the Company’s common stock were 10,665,982 with a weighted average exercise price of $0.84. There were no new warrants issued through May 22, 2014. Theduring the three months ended June 30, 2022. As of June 30, 2022 and March 31, 2022, the weighted average remaining 141,000contractual terms were 3.86 and 4.11 years, respectively.

8. Stock- Based Compensation

Stock Option Plan:

On August 8, 2018, the Board and stockholders holding a majority of our voting power approved the RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc., 2018 Plan, which plan enables us to make awards that qualify as performance-based compensation. Under the terms of the 2018 Plan, the options will (i) be incentive stock options, (ii) have an exercise price equal to the fair market value per share of our common stock on the date of grant as determined by an independent valuation by a qualified appraiser, (iii) have a term of 10 years, (iv) vest and become exercisable pursuant to the terms set forth in the grantees stock option agreement, (v) be subject to the exercise, forfeiture and termination provisions set forth in the 2018 Plan and (vi) otherwise be evidenced by and subject to the terms of our standard form of stock option agreement. We initially reserved 2,000,000 shares of our common stock valued at $7,050 ($0.05 per share),for issuance in connection with awards under the plan. On September 15, 2020 and March 18, 2021, our board of directors unanimously resolved to amend the 2018 Plan to increase the number of shares of our common stock available for grant to 4,000,000 shares and 6,000,000 shares, respectively. On May 10, 2022, the Board has approved a plan to increase the number of shares to 8,000,000 for 2018 plan. As of June 30, 2022 and March 31, 2022, there were retained2,176,198 and 393,987 shares, respectively, of our common stock available for grant pursuant to the 2018 Plan. 

10 

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2022

(UNAUDITED)

Service-Based Stock Option Grants

In determining the fair value of the service-based options during the three months ended June 30, 2022, we utilized the Black-Scholes pricing model utilizing the following assumptions:

Schedule of Share-based Payment Award, Stock Options, Valuation Assumptions

Option exercise price per share$0.21 - $0.30
Grant date fair value per share$0.20 - $0.29
Expected volatility163%
Expected term of option in years6.25
Range of risk-free interest rate2.5%
Dividend yield-

Activity under the 2018 Plan for all service-based stock options for the three months ended June 30, 2022 are as follows:

Schedule of Stock Option Activity

  

Options

Outstanding

  

Weighted-

Average Exercise

Price per Share

  

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Term in Years

  

Aggregate

Intrinsic Value

 
Options outstanding at April 1, 2022:  5,606,013  $0.33   8.57  $5,000 
Granted  100,000   0.26         
Exercised  -   -         
Cancelled or forfeited  (482,211)  1.96         
Options outstanding as of June 30, 2022  5,223,802  $0.33   8.31  $- 
Options vested and exercisable as of June 30, 2022  2,485,282  $0.29      $- 

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the closing price of the common stock on June 30, 2022 of $0.16 and the exercise price of each in-the-money option) that would have been received by the Sellersoption holders had all option holders exercised their options on June 30, 2022. There were no service-based stock options exercised under the 2018 Plan for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021.

For the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, we recorded stock-based compensation expense for service-based stock options pursuant to the 2018 Plan in the amount of $264,235 and $291,492, respectively. As of June 30, 2022 and March 31, 2022, we had $3,015,293 and $3,336,948 of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to service-based stock options, respectively.

Performance-Based Stock Option Grants

We also granted performance-based options pursuant to the 2018 Plan to Rohan Hall, our chief technology officer, which are exercisable into 600,000 shares of our common stock subject to certain designated milestones. On March 18, 2021, our Board of Directors determined that Mr. Hall earned all of the performance-based options effective February 1, 2021. The Board of Directors also entered into a resolution whereby 75,000 shares of our common stock underlying the performance-based options would vest immediately and 525,000 shares of our common stock underlying the performance-based option would vest ratably over a 48-month period with the first vesting date being February 1, 2021.

11 

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2022

(UNAUDITED)

In determining the fair value of the performance-based options granted to Mr. Hall on September 14, 2020 and earned effective February 1, 2021, we utilized the Black-Scholes pricing model utilizing the following assumptions:

Schedule of Share-based Payment Award, Stock Options, Valuation Assumptions

  

Performance

-Based

Options

 
Option exercise price per share $1.08 
Grant date fair market value per share $1.08 
Expected term of option in years  6.25 
Expected volatility  240.1%
Expected dividend rate  0.00%
Risk free interest rate  0.54%

Activity under the 2018 Plan for all performance-based stock options for the three months ended June 30, 2022 is as liquidated damages,follows:

Schedule of Stock Option Activity

  

Options

Outstanding

  

Weighted-

Average Exercise

Price per Share

  

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Term in Years

  

Aggregate

Intrinsic Value

 
Options outstanding at April 1, 2022:  600,000  $0.33   8.46  $- 
Granted  -   -         
Exercised  -   -         
Cancelled or forfeited  -   -         
Options outstanding as of June 30, 2022  600,000  $0.33   8.21  $- 
Options vested and exercisable as of June 30, 2022  250,008  $0.33      $- 

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the closing price of the common stock on June 30, 2022 of $0.16 and the exercise price of each in-the-money option) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on June 30, 2022. There were issued on Decemberno performance-based stock options exercised under the 2018 Plan for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021.

For the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, we recorded stock-based compensation expense for performance-based stock options pursuant to the 2018 Plan in the amount of $27,147 and $25,404, respectively. As of June 30, 2022 and March 31, 2014.2022, we had $288,016 and $315,164 of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to performance-based stock options, respectively. There were no performance-based stock options exercised under the 2018 Plan for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021.

9. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

Other than as set forth below, we are not the subject of any pending legal proceedings; and to the knowledge of management, no proceedings are presently contemplated against us by any federal, state or local governmental agency. Further, to the knowledge of management, no director or executive officer is party to any action in which any has an interest adverse to us.

On October 8, 2020, we filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against Joseph Page, our former director and chief technology officer. On January 13, 2021, the case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas Division. The causes of action include securities fraud under Federal and California law; fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment under California law; and violation of California Business and Professions Code §17200 et seq.

On May 29, 2019, Mr. Page resigned from our board. After his resignation, we retained independent patent counsel to review our patent applications. In conjunctionconnection with this review, we discovered certain deficiencies in some of the applications and in their assignments to us. We determined that all of the applications had been abandoned. Based on this review, we decided to refile three of our applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which we did in May 2020. It is our belief that the three newly filed patent applications cover and/or disclose the same subject matter as we disclosed in the partiesfive original patent applications. In this case, our rights may be subject to any intervening patent applications made after the dates of the original applications. In the lawsuit, we were alleging that Mr. Page was aware of the abandonments when he assigned the patents to RocketFuel Blockchain Company (“RBC”), a private corporation that he controlled, and that he failed to disclose to us the abandonments when the Company acquired RBC in exchange for shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Mr. Page filed an answer denying the Company’s claims and asserted cross- and counterclaims against the Company and several of the Company’s shareholders alleging breach of contract and fraud. In September 2021, Mr. Page voluntarily dismissed all of the counterclaims against the shareholders.

12 

ROCKETFUEL BLOCKCHAIN, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2022

(UNAUDITED)

On June 7, 2022, RBC entered into a settlement agreement and mutual release.


On September 9, 2013,in the legal proceedings between the Company issued 12,000 shares of common stock having a fair value of $3,172 ($0.26434 per share) in exchange for consulting services to be provided by an officer of the Company. These shares were returned to the Companyas plaintiff, and cancelled pursuant to the above described rescissions. In conjunction with this matter, the parties entered into settlement agreements and mutual releases.


As all of the above-described stock transactions were subsequently rescinded, they were not recorded on the books of the Company, except for the 141,000 shares of common stock issued to Anderson and Christopherson on December 31, 2014.




On September 9, 2013, the Company issued 91,791.96 shares of common stock having a fair value of $24,264 ($0.26434 per share) in exchange for consulting services to be provided by Red Rock Servicing, Inc. (“Red Rock”).  Previous management of the Company determined that the contracted services were never performed, and demanded the return of such shares from Red Rock. The Company has issued stop-transfer instructions to its transfer agent, and has consistently excluded these shares from the reported total of its outstanding shares. The Company is currently engaged in a dispute regarding such shares with Red Rock and is indemnified with respect to such matter by the former controlling shareholders of the Company.  On November 4 , 2015, the Company filed a civil action in the Third District Court, State of Utah, for a declaratory judgment that the consulting agreement was not valid and enforceable, for rescission of the agreement and the issuance of the shares, and for damages for fraud and negligent misrepresentation. The Company intends to cancel these shares upon their return.


5. Stockholders’ Equity


The Company has authorized a total of 750,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share.

On May 12, 2015, the Company sold 4,979,524 newly issued shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to PacificWave at a price of $0.05 per share, representing aggregate proceeds of $248,976.


At the closing of the above described purchase of shares on May 12, 2015, PacificWave contributed $175,000 in cash to the capital of the Company, which was recordedJoseph Page as a credit to additional paid-in capital.


On July 15, 2015, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada providing for a one-for-fifty reverse split of its outstanding shares of common stock effective August 21, 2015. The authorized defendant, whereunder Page surrendered 3,600,394 shares of the Company’s common stock, wereand kept 1,500,000 shares. Mr. Page represents and warrants that he has not adjusted as a resultfiled or assisted anyone else in filing any patent applications that would preempt or infringe upon the reverse stock split.


See Note 4 for a descriptionCompany’s patent applications. Plaintiff and defendant have each released their claims against each other and covenanted not to sue the other, including related parties and stakeholders, with the exclusion of additional common stock transactions. 

6. Satisfaction of Amounts Due to Related Parties and Resolution of Contingent Claims

 As of December 31, 2014, the Company was indebtedcurrent or future claims against EGS. The parties agreed to a significant vendor, whoStipulated Dismissal of the Action with Prejudice filed with the court. In connection with this settlement, we recognized a gain of $540,059, calculated based on the Company’s share price of $0.15 per share on the date of settlement of the legal proceedings. This gain was consequently deemed to be a related party,recorded in other income for funds advancedthe three months ended June 30, 2022 in the amountaccompanying consolidated statements of $140,297, including interest accrued at 6% per annumoperations (see Note 7).

On March 2, 2021, we filed a lawsuit in the amountU.S. District Court for the Southern District of $34,388. The advances, including accrued interest, were dueNew York against Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP (“EGS”) for negligence and payable upon demand. This obligation, including accrued interestlegal malpractice, breach of $35,977 on May 12, 2015, was paid in cash in connection withcontract and breach of fiduciary duty. EGS had represented RBC prior to the change-in-control transaction described at Note 2. In addition, accounts payable in the amount of $8,071Business Combination and a contingent liability of the Company in the amount of $46,543 which arose in conjunction with the change-in-control negotiations, were also satisfied by cash payments on May 12, 2015 in connection withrepresented us after the closing of the change-in-control transaction described at Note 2.Business Combination through August 2019. In the litigation against Mr. Page, he has alleged that he provided information to an EGS partner that the patent applications had been abandoned and that EGS failed to inform RBC and us of the fact. We are seeking damages and the return of legal fees previously paid.


An additional contingent liabilityAt the date of $3,976this report, the Company is unable to estimate the probability of success or dollar amount of rulings in the March 2, 2021 case against EGS, and as a result, has not accrued any potential benefit to the Company's former principal stockholder was also satisfied in connection withCompany’s balance sheet. Attorney fees related to these proceedings are expensed as incurred.

10. Subsequent Events

We evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after the closing of the change-in-control transaction described at Note 2.

The Company settled a contingent claim to a non-related party for legal services rendered in connection with the rescinded mining transactions, which also arose in conjunction with the change-in-control negotiations, by a cash payment of $42,000 on May 12, 2015 in connection with the closing of the change-in-control transaction described at Note 2.


7. Commitments and Contingencies

On May 1, 2015, the Company executed a month-to-month lease for office space beginning May 1, 2015 at a cost of $4,200 per month.  On November 1, 2015, the month-to-month lease was modified by reducing the amount of space leased with a corresponding reduction in rent to $2,100 per month.


Information with respect to a current dispute is provided at Note 4.

8. Subsequent Events

The Company performed an evaluation of subsequent eventsbalance sheet date through the date of filing ofwhen we issued these financial statements and, other than the matters discussed below, we did not have any other material recognizable subsequent events during this period.

We entered into a marketing service agreement on July 20, 2022 with a certain marketing firm whereby the SEC, noting no additional items requiring disclosure. marketing firm provides various marketing services for us. In connection with this agreement, we issued 333,943 shares in consideration for the performance of the services by this firm. 






13 

ITEMItem 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONSManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

OverviewForward-Looking Statements

B4MC Gold Mines, Inc. (the “Company”) was organized underThis Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain statements that are “forward-looking” within the lawsmeaning of the State of Delaware,federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements and other information are based on April 2, 1987,our beliefs as BK Ventures. well as assumptions made by us using information currently available.

The Company was organizedwords “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “will,” “should” and similar expressions, as they relate to create a corporate vehicle to seek and acquire a business opportunity. In June 2000, the Company reincorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. On October 10, 2013, the Company amended its articles of incorporation to change its name to B4MC Gold Mines, Inc. The Company is engaged in effortsus, are intended to identify an operating companyforward-looking statements. Such statements reflect our current views with respect to acquire or merge with through an equity-based exchange transaction that would likely result in a change in control of the Company. As the Company’s planned principal operations have not yet commenced, the Company activitiesfuture events and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, and are not guaranties of future performance. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected, intended or using other similar expressions. We are making investors aware that such forward-looking statements, because they relate to future events, are by their very nature subject to many important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from our predictions include, without limitation:

Market acceptance of our products and services;
Competition from existing products or new products that may emerge;
The implementation of our business model and strategic plans for our business and our products;
Estimates of our future revenue, expenses, capital requirements and our need for financing;
Our financial performance;
Current and future government regulations;
Developments relating to our competitors; and
Other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under the section titled “Risk Factors” in our annual report filed on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2022.

Although we have sought to identify the most significant risks to our business, we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, any of such risks may be realized, nor can there be any assurance that we have identified all possible issues which we might face. For all of these reasons, the reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements contained herein, which speak only as of the date hereof. We assume no responsibility to update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise except as required by law. We urge readers to review carefully the risk factors described in this Quarterly Report and uncertainties, includingin our annual report filed on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2022. You can read these documents at www.sec.gov.

Overview

Our Business

We provide payment and check-out systems enabling shoppers on e-commerce sites to pay using cryptocurrencies and direct bank transfers. Currently our payment and check-out systems focus on B2C applications; we are currently developing B2B capabilities that will among other things enable businesses to receive payments on their invoices in cryptocurrencies. Our check-out systems are based upon blockchain technology and are designed to reduce costs and increase speed, security and ease of use. We believe that users of our systems enjoy a seamless check-out experience compared to current online shopping solutions, and that merchants will realize cost savings and other advantages over credit-card based payment systems.

We are developing versions of our payment systems for use for in-store purchases and other applications. Our check-out and payment systems securely automate and simplify the way online payment and shipping information is received by merchants from their customers. Our “one click” checkout solution is modeled on the “buy now” button on leading eCommerce sites. Our check-out systems are designed to enhance customers’ data protection, enabling consumers to pay for goods and services using cryptocurrencies or by direct transfers from their bank accounts without exposing spending credentials such as credit card data. At the same time, our check-out systems are designed to increase the speed, security and ease of use for both customers and merchants and include a merchant portal that provides detailed transaction information, metrics and reports. Our systems also include a customer portal where shoppers are able to track their payments, configure payment defaults and connect with various cryptocurrency exchanges and banks to facilitate payment to merchants. Merchants are able to integrate a unique pop-up user interface that allows customers to pay directly from their ecommerce checkout page with no need to obtain additional financing, as described below.redirect to another website or web page.


14 

Change-in-Control Transaction


On May 12, 2015,Our merchant portal is updated instantly when a payment transaction is made on the Company sold 4,979,524 newly issued shares of its common stock, par value $0.001 per share, to PacificWave Partners Limited, a Gibraltar Company (“PacificWave”), at a price of $0.05 per share, representing aggregate gross proceeds of $248,976. Of this amount, $225,000 was paid to certain creditors and claimants of the Company in exchange for releases of such outstanding claims, and the remaining $23,976 was placed in escrow and was subject to release pending the fulfillment of certain conditions.


Simultaneous with the purchase of the above described shares of common stock, PacificWave purchased from Elwood Shepard, the Company's principal shareholder at the time, 520,476 shares of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, representing 75.9% of the outstanding shares prior to the issuance of the newly issued shares.merchant’s website. The purchase price of such shares was $26,024, which amount was deposited in escrow and will be disbursed in the same manner and under the same conditions as the amount deposited into escrow from the purchase price of the Company's newly issued common shares.


In that all conditions were met, all amounts deposited into escrow were disbursed pursuant to the terms of the escrow in July 2015.


At the closing of the purchase of the above described shares, PacificWave contributed $175,000 in cash to the capital of the Company, which was recorded as a credit to additional paid-in capital.


At the closingmerchant is notified of the transaction and can see the transaction details, including the customer that made the transaction, the transaction amount and the items purchased. This information is available to the merchant on May 12, 2015, PacificWave transferred 1,000,000its dashboard, where various metrics are tracked and displayed to the merchant, including information about the various cryptocurrencies that are used for payments to that merchant, the different currencies received by the merchant as payment and transaction details such as the transaction hash. In addition to various metrics, merchants are able to generate a variety of reports, and are able to configure various options, including settlement options, from their portal.

Customers of merchants that use the Company’s common shares acquiredRocketFuel payment solution are able to track their payments in their own online portal. They are also able to track payments they made to all the merchants that are integrated with the RocketFuel payment technology within a single consolidated user portal. They are currently able to connect to their accounts on Coinbase and in the future we plan to add connectivity to Binance, Kraken, Gemini and other exchanges. Customers can also pay from any cryptocurrency wallet, such as described hereinMetamask and Electrum and are able to three non-U.S. resident accredited investors at a price of $0.50 per share ($500,000 in aggregate).pay from their bank accounts as well. These funds were utilizedcustomers are able to effectuate the change-in-control transaction. The Company was not a party tomake payment with any of these transactions.payment options with 1, 2, or 3 clicks from the merchant checkout page. By default, these customers can choose from over 100 cryptocurrencies with which to pay.


Our payment user interface allows customers to easily onboard as well as to pay for merchants’ products or services with a variety of cryptocurrencies or via bank transfers. The user interface is displayed as a stand-alone popup that allows the creation of new accounts as well as payment directly from crypto exchanges, crypto wallets, and bank accounts, with no redirects to browser tabs or pages. This can be integrated as a plugin on the merchant checkout page or as a browser extension. The plugin, which we are currently developing, will come integrated with popular ecommerce platforms including WooCommerce, Shopify, Prestashop and others. The browser extension is integrated with popular browsers including Chrome, Chromium, Opera, Firefox, and Edge. The payment interface is designed for both web and mobile checkout experiences. Merchants are able to integrate the RocketFuel payment interface to their checkout page with software development kits (SDKs) that are available via the merchant portal. Application programming interfaces (APIs) are also available to the merchant for deeper integration into backend systems, ERP platforms, and other third-party platforms.

Our solution is designed to be implemented on an eCommerce site’s check-out page. The technology will also be used for different scenarios, including paying for services, paying invoices, and other payment strategies. In addition, we anticipate that a future version of our payment system will allow for advertisements in which the entire checkout process is embedded to be placed on third party websites where sales may be completely finalized. Thus, our technology will enable eCommerce strategies that can include advertisements with a fully integrated check-out process. We believe that this has never before been accomplished on any eCommerce platform. We believe that such advertisements could provide significant new sales channels to retailers that are simply not possible with legacy check-out solutions. We also believe that transactions costs on our system will be significantly less expensive than the cost of credit-card transactions.

The RocketFuel check-out solution is designed to operate identically across merchant channels with all participating merchants. eCommerce merchants are able to encode their check-out protocol to support our technology and the merchants will no longer have to administer complex check-out and payment gateways at their eCommerce websites. At the closingsame time, consumers are able to experience enhanced data protection opportunities and significantly improved convenience.

With the RocketFuel check-out systems, consumers will no longer have to enter credit card information or shipping details every time they want to buy online. Payment and shipping information will be handled automatically. Using the RocketFuel payment solution, credit card data will no longer be shared or transmitted and exposed online. Rather, payments will be made via 100% secure cryptocurrency conveyance or direct bank transfer on May 12, 2015, PacificWave transferred 2,698,334 sharesthe blockchain.

Our corporate headquarters are located in San Francisco, California.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to certain personsthe financial statements as of March 31, 2022 which are included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. There were no changes to our significant accounting policies during the three months ended June 30, 2022 as compared to the significant account policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2022. Our discussion and entities providing servicesanalysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon these financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. In the past, actual results have not been materially different from our estimates. However, results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

15 

Results of Operations

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2022 vs June 30, 2021

Revenues

During the three months ended June 30, 2022, we recorded revenues of $8,132 as a result of transaction fees and the recognition of amortization of deferred setup fee revenues in connection with the transactionexecution of contracts with customers. During the three months ended June 30, 2021, we recorded revenues of $2,500 for similar recognition of deferred revenues.

We anticipate that future revenues will continue to be generated from (i) fees charged in connection with the implementation of our blockchain technology; and (ii) ongoing daily transactional fees derived as follows: (i) 466,667 shares (constituting 8.2%a negotiated percentage of the outstanding shares)transactional revenues earned by our merchant customers.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2022 were $258,965 as compared with $326,217 for the prior year period, a decrease of $67,252. The decrease is primarily a result of a larger portion of effort of contract developers and the payroll expenses being directed toward capitalized development of and improvements in our blockchain technology software for payment processing.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2022 were $1,237,954 as compared with $880,874 for the prior year period, an increase of $357,080. The increase is primarily a result of (i) an increase in legal fees of approximately $125,000 incurred in connection with business development strategies; (ii) increased payroll and recruiting expenses of approximately $192,000 incurred in connection with the hiring of certain key management and technical personnel; and (iii) an increase of approximately $33,000 in finance professional fees in designing and managing accounting systems to Allan Kronborg,accommodate additional revenue stream opportunities.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We will require additional financing in order to continue to develop our product and execute on our business plan. However, there can be no assurances that we will be successful in raising the additional capital necessary to continue operations and execute on our business plan. Any potential future sale of equity or debt securities may result in dilution to our stockholders, and we cannot be certain that additional public or private financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we are required to raise additional financing, but are unable to obtain such financing, we may be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more aspects of our operations or business development activities.

On June 30, 2022, we had total assets of $2,116,241 and total liabilities of $716,401. This compares to total assets of $3,110,795 and total liabilities of $513,550 on March 31, 2022. As of June 30, 2022, our assets consisted of $1,492,846 of cash and restricted cash, $1,362 of accounts receivable, $81,057 of prepaid and other current assets and $540,976 of property and equipment, net of depreciation and amortization. The decrease in assets compared to March 31, 2022 is due to the use of cash to pay for operating costs as a citizenresult of Denmark;increase business activities, somewhat offset by the increase in prepaid and other current assets and the capitalization of software development costs. As of June 30, 2022, our liabilities consist of $657,430 of accounts payable and accrued expenses, $47,679 due to related parties and $11,292 of deferred revenue. The increase in liabilities compared to March 31, 2022 is largely due to increases of accounts payables and accrued expenses with a lesser increase in amounts due to a related party.

On June 30, 2022, we had working capital of $858,864 and a stockholders’ equity of $1,399,840 compared to working capital of $2,137,069 and stockholders’ equity of $2,597,245 at March 31, 2022. Working capital decreased during the three months ended June 30, 2022 largely due to cash used in operating activities to expand on the Company’s product offerings and capabilities of its software. Stockholders’ equity decreased due to the operating loss for the three-month period ended June 30, 2022, with no additional private placement funds to offset the operating loss.

As of June 30, 2022, we had cash and restricted cash of $1,492,846 as compared to $2,634,794 as of March 31, 2022.

16 

During the three months ended June 30, 2022, we had net cash of $974,067 used in operating activities, which was composed primarily of (i) our net loss of $948,728, (ii) a totalgain from a legal settlement of 966,667 shares (constituting 17.1% of the outstanding shares) split among PacificWave Partners Europe sarl, PacificWave Partners UK Europe Ltd., Richway Finance Ltd. and Anarholl Ltd., all of which are entities affiliated with Henrik Oerbekker, a citizen of Denmark;$540,059, and (iii) a totalincreases in prepaid and other current assets of 1,265,000 shares (constituting 22.3%$68,707. The cash flows used in operating activities were partially offset by (i) stock-based compensation of $291,382 in connection with stock options granted pursuant to the outstanding shares) to nine non-U.S. resident persons2018 Stock Option Plan, (ii) depreciation and entities. Effective September 10, 2015, Anarholl Ltd. gifted 126,667 shares to two unaffiliated purchasersamortization of $87,081, (iii) an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $170,230, and (iv) an increase in a private transaction, reducingpayable to a related party of $36,402. During the numberthree months ended June 30, 2021, we had net cash of shares beneficially owned$876,340 used in operating activities, which was composed of our net loss of $1,204,591 and offset by Mr. Oerbekker(i) stock-based compensation of $316,896 and (ii) smaller incremental increases and decreases to 840,000 shares (constituting 14.8%accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses, payables to related parties and deferred revenues.

During the three months ended June 30, 2022, we used cash of $167,881 for the outstanding shares). The Company was not a party to anypurchase of these transactions.property and equipment and the capitalization of software development costs. There were no such investments during the three-month period ended June 30, 2021.


Effective May 12, 2015, Elwood Shepard,During the Company’s sole officer and director at that time, resigned, and Bennett J. Yankowitz was appointed asthree months ended June 30, 2022, we had no cash provided by financing activities, compared with $582,500 net cash provided by the Company’s sole director and as its President, Secretary and Treasurer. In conjunction with the aforementioned transactions with PacificWave, on May 12, 2015, Mr. Yankowitz purchased from PacificWave 800,000 sharesissuance of common stock for an aggregate purchase pricein connection with exercise of $40,000 ($0.05 per share), reflecting approximately 14.1% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock at that time. The purchase price was evidenced by a promissory note due May 12, 2019 with interest at 3% per annum and secured bywarrants during the purchased shares. The Company was not a party to this transaction. Mr. Yankowitz does not have any interest in or contract with Pacific Wave. PacificWave and Mr. Yankowitz did not have any relationship with the Company prior to the aforementioned change-in-control transaction. On May 15, 2015, Mr. Yankowitz sold 10,000 shares at a purchase price of $0.50 per share ($5,000) to an unaffiliated purchaser.three-month period ended June 30, 2021.


At the conclusion of all of these transactions, PacificWave and its Managing Director and sole owner, Henrik Rouf, were the beneficial owners of an aggregate of 1,001,666 shares of the Company’s common stock, which constituted 17.7% of the outstanding shares of common stock.




Henrik Rouf is Managing Director of PacificWave and also serves as Assistant Secretary of the Company. While PacificWave does not have a formal contract with the Company, it is expected to continue to provide consulting and investment banking services to the Company, in particular with respect to raising capital for the Company and in identifying and evaluating potential acquisition candidates. PacificWave has indicated that it intends to use the Company as a platform for the acquisition of an operating company, and that it was currently in the process of evaluating potential acquisition target companies in the global environmental remediation and other market sectors. It is anticipated that any such acquisition, when consummated, would involve one or more of the following: (1) the issuance of additional common stock or other equity securities of the Company to the owners of the acquired company, resulting in a change of control; (2) an extraordinary corporate transaction, such as a merger, reorganization or liquidation, involving the Company; (3) a change in the present board of directors or management of the Company, including any plans or proposals to change the number or term of directors or to fill any existing vacancies on the board; (4) a material change in the present capitalization or dividend policy of the Company; (5) a material change in the present capitalization or dividend policy of the Company; (6) changes in the Company's charter, bylaws or instruments corresponding thereto or other actions which may impede the acquisition of control of the Company by any person; or (7) actions similar to any of those enumerated above.

Going Concern

The Company’s condensedOur financial statements have been presented on the basis that it iswe are a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At SeptemberDuring the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company did not have any business operations. The Company has experienced recurring operating losses2022, we reported a net loss of $948,728, which included non-cash stock-based compensation of $291,382 and negative operating$540,059 of gain from a legal settlement, and cash flows and has financed its recent working capital requirements through the issuanceused in operating activities of equity securities, as well as borrowings from related parties. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had working capital of $48,939, primarily as a result of the May 12, 2015 transactions as described herein, and an accumulated deficit of $2,614,100. As a result, management believes that there is$974,067. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

The Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and to ultimately acquire or develop a commercially viable business. The Company’s condensedconsolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.this uncertainty.

Recent Accounting PronouncementsCommitments


In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09),Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction- and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current GAAP and replace itWe do not have any long-term commitments as of June 30, 2022.

Subsequent Events

We entered into a marketing service agreement on July 20, 2022 with a principle based approachcertain marketing firm whereby the marketing firm provides various marketing services for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. ASU 2014-09 also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. Based on the FASB’s Exposure Draft Update issued on April 29, 2015,Revenue from Contracts With Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, it is expected that ASU 2014-09 will now be effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Entities will be able to transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption.  The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 (ASU 2014-15),Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-10). ASU 2014-15 provides guidance as to management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures.us. In connection with preparingthis agreement, we issued 333,943 shares in consideration for the performance of the services by this firm. 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2022, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial statements for each annualcondition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

Impact of COVID-19 on Our Business

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted, and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, consideredmay continue to result, in significant economic disruption despite progress made in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt aboutdevelopment and distribution of vaccines. It has already disrupted global travel, supply chains and the entity’s abilitylabor market and adversely impacted global commercial activity. Considerable uncertainty still surrounds COVID-19, the evolution of its variants, its potential long-term economic effects, as well as the effectiveness of any responses taken by government authorities and businesses and of various efforts to continueinoculate the global population. The travel restrictions, limits on hours of operations and/or closures of non-essential businesses, and other efforts to curb the spread of COVID-19 have significantly disrupted business activity globally and there is uncertainty as a going concern within one year afterto when these disruptions will fully subside.

Significant uncertainty continues to exist concerning the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2014-15 will have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.




In January 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 (ASU 2015-01),Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20).ASU 2015-01 eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Subtopic 225-20, Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items, required that an entity separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions. Presently, an event or transaction is presumed to be an ordinary and usual activity of the reporting entity unless evidence clearly supports its classification as an extraordinary item. Paragraph 225-20-45-2 contains the following criteria that must both be met for extraordinary classification: (1) Unusual nature. The underlying event or transaction should possess a high degree of abnormalityCOVID-19 pandemic on our customers’ and be of a type clearly unrelated to, or only incidentally related to, the ordinaryprospects’ business and typical activities of the entity, taking into account the environment in which the entity operates. (2) Infrequency of occurrence. The underlying event or transaction should be of a type that would not reasonably be expected to recur in the foreseeable future, taking into account the environment in which the entity operates. If an event or transaction meets the criteria for extraordinary classification, an entity is required to segregate the extraordinary item from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. The entity also is required to disclose applicable income taxes and either present or disclose earnings-per-share data applicable to the extraordinary item. ASU 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. A reporting entity may apply the guidance prospectively. A reporting entity also may apply the guidance retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2015-01 will have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02 (ASU 2015-02),Consolidation (Topic 810).ASU 2015-02 changes the guidance with respect to the analysis that a reporting entity must perform to determine whether it should consolidate certain types of legal entities. All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation mode. ASU 2015-02 affects the following areas:  (1) limited partnerships and similar legal entities; (2) evaluating fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider as a variable interest; (3) the effect of fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination; (4) the effect of related parties on the primary beneficiary determination; and (5) certain investment funds. ASU 2015-02 is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the guidance in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. A reporting entity may apply the amendments in this guidance using a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. A reporting entity also may apply the amendments retrospectively. The Company does not currently expect that the adoption of ASU 2015-02 will have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03 (ASU 2015-03),Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). ASU 2015-03 simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs and requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the new guidance. ASU 2015-3 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within that fiscal year. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. An entity is required to apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis, wherein the balance sheet of each individual period presented is adjusted to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. Upon transition, an entity is required to comply with the applicable disclosures for a change in an accounting principle. These disclosures include the nature of and reason for the change in accounting principle, the transition method, a description of the prior-period information that has been retrospectively adjusted, and the effect of the change on the financial statement line items (i.e., debt issuance cost asset and the debt liability). The adoption of ASU 2015-03 is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, authoritative guidance, if currently adopted, would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

Concentration of Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash. The Company limits its exposure to credit loss by investing its cash with high credit quality financial institutions.




Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company prepared its condensed financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management periodically evaluates the estimates and judgments made. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates as a result of different assumptions or conditions.

The following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements.


Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Accordingly, the Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected impact of differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities.

The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. In the event the Company was to determine that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets in the future in excess of its recorded amount, an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be credited to operations in the period such determination was made. Likewise, should the Company determine that it would not be able to realize all or part of its deferred tax assets in the future an adjustment to the deferred tax assets would be charged to operations in the period such determination was made.

Results of Operations

The Company has no revenue-generating operations at September 30, 2015.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

General and Administrative. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, general and administrative expenses were $39,781, which consisted of professional fees of $16,703, filing fees of $8,970, rent of $10,740, and other operating costs of $3,368.

For the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company incurred $450 of general and administrative expenses.


Cost of Pending Transaction. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred professional fees relating to a potential acquisition in the amount of $79,053.


Interest Expense. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, there was no interest expense. Interest expenseperiods. Although our total revenues for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20142022 were not materially impacted by COVID- 19, we believe our revenues may be negatively impacted in future periods until the effects of $1,589 consistedthe pandemic have fully subsided and the current macroeconomic environment has substantially recovered. The uncertainty related to COVID-19 may also result in increased volatility in the financial projections we use as the basis for estimates and assumptions used in our financial statements. We have adapted our operations to meet the challenges of interest expense on an advance from a related party, which was paid on May 12, 2015.

Net Loss. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred a net loss of $118,834, as comparedthis uncertain and rapidly evolving situation, including establishing remote working arrangements for our employees, limiting non-essential business travel, and cancelling or shifting our customer, employee, and industry events to a net loss of $2,039virtual-only format for the three months ended September 30, 2014.foreseeable future. We have not received any government assistance from various relief packages available in countries where we operate.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 and 2014

General and Administrative. ForEffects of the nine months ended September 30, 2015, general and administrative expenses were $76,711, which consisted of professional fees of $37,453, filing fees of $14,939, rent of $19,140, and other operating costs of $5,179.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company incurred $1,442 of general and administrative expenses.


Cost of Pending Transaction. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred professional fees relating to a potential acquisitionCOVID-19 pandemic that may negatively impact our business in the amount of $79,053.


Interest Expense. For the nine months endedSeptember 30, 2015, interest expense of $1,589 consisted of interest expense on an advance from a related party, which was paid on May 12, 2015. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 of $4,767 consisted of interest expensefuture periods include, but are not limited to: limitations on the same related party advance, which was paid on May 12, 2015.




Costability of our customers to Settle Contingent Claims. Forconduct their business, purchase our products and services, and make timely payments; curtailed consumer spending; deferred purchasing decisions; delayed consulting services implementations; labor shortages and decreases in product licenses revenues driven by channel partners. We will continue to actively monitor the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred a loss from settlement of contingent claims of $92,519, which consisted of amounts paid to settle debts to professionalsnature and related parties for which the Company was potentially liable. Such amounts were settled and paid in cash in connection with the change-in-control transaction that occurred on May 12, 2015.


Net Loss. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company incurred a net loss of $249,872, as compared to a net loss of $6,209 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Liquidity and Capital Resources – September 30, 2015

The Company’s condensed financial statements have been presented on the basis that it is a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. At September 30, 2015, the Company did not have any business operations. The Company has experienced recurring operating losses and negative operating cash flows, and has financed its recent working capital requirements through the issuance of equity securities, as well as borrowings from related parties. As a result, management believes that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern (see “Going Concern” above).

At September 30, 2015, the Company had working capital of $48,939, as compared to a working capital deficit of $123,963 at December 31, 2014, an increase in working capital of $172,902 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. At September 30, 2015, the Company had cash of $101,811, as compared to $0 at December 31, 2014, an increase of $101,811 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. At September 30, 2015, the Company also had funds held in trust by attorneys of $0, as compared to $25,000 at December 31, 2014, a decrease of $25,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in working capital and cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was the result of a private placementextent of the Company’s common stockimpact to our business, operating results, and a capital contribution in May 2015 that generated net proceeds of $422,774.financial condition.

Operating Activities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, operating activities utilized cash of $240,054 to fund general and administrative expenses, the costs of a pending transaction, and a loss from the settlement of contingent claims. The Company did not have any operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Investing Activities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, investing activities generated cash of $25,000 from a decrease in funds held in trust by an attorney. The Company did not have any investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Financing Activities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, financing activities totaled $316,865, which consisted of the gross proceeds of $248,976 received from the sale of 4,979,524 shares of the Company’s common stock and a capital contribution of $175,000 in May 2015, less the payment of $1,202 for costs incurred relating to such stock sale, and the repayment of related party advances, including accrued interest, in the amount of $105,909. The Company did not have any financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At September 30, 2015, the Company did not have any transactions, obligations or relationships that could be considered off-balance sheet arrangements.





17 

ITEM

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISKQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

ITEMItem 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURESControls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company carried outBased on an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of itsour management, consisting of itsour principal executive officer and principal financial officer (who is the same person), of the effectiveness of the Company’shave concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (asas defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) ofunder the Exchange Act (defined below)). Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that,were not effective as of the end of the period covered in this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effectiveJune 30, 2022 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filedthat we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods specified in the SEC rules and isforms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to the Company’sour management, consisting of the Company’sincluding our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that, as of June 30, 2022, our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Companyfollowing changes have been made in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal period to which this determination becausereport relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We have engaged a new accountant and an independent Controller to transact and oversee the financial activities of the Company, did not timely file its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q forwith preparation of our public filings by an SEC Manager, each with the quarterly period ended June 30, 2015.guidance of our SEC Director. These persons are under the purview of our CFO.

 

The Company’s management, consistingWe intend to perform additional internal control improvements, beginning with written documentation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that its disclosure controls and procedures or its internal controls will prevent all error or fraud. processes.

Inherent Limitations of the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the internal control system are met. Furthermore, the designBecause of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in allof any internal control systems,system, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected. In addition, as conditions change over time, so too may the effectiveness of internal controls. However, management believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

18 

(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management, consisting of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has determined that there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as that term is defined in Rules 13(a)-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) occurred during or subsequent to the end of the period covered in this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  However, as there was a change in the Company’s management in May 2015, new management is in the process of developing controls and procedures that are adequate to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, consisting of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer (who is the same person), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.





PART II -II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEMItem 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGSLegal Proceedings

Other than as set forth below, we are not the subject of any pending legal proceedings; and to the knowledge of management, no proceedings are presently contemplated against us by any federal, state or local governmental agency. Further, to the knowledge of management, no director or executive officer is party to any action in which any has an interest adverse to us.

On September 9, 2013,October 8, 2020, we filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California against Joseph Page, our former director and chief technology officer. On January 13, 2021, the case was transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas Division. The causes of action include securities fraud under Federal and California law; fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment under California law; and violation of California Business and Professions Code §17200 et seq.

On May 29, 2019, Mr. Page resigned from our board. After his resignation, we retained independent patent counsel to review our patent applications. In connection with this review, we discovered certain deficiencies in some of the applications and in their assignments to us. We determined that all of the applications had been abandoned. Based on this review, we decided to refile three of our applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which we did in May 2020. It is our belief that the three newly filed patent applications cover and/or disclose the same subject matter as we disclosed in the five original patent applications. In this case, our rights may be subject to any intervening patent applications made after the dates of the original applications. In the lawsuit, we were alleging that Mr. Page was aware of the abandonments when he assigned the patents to RocketFuel Blockchain Company (“RBC”), a private corporation that he controlled, and that he failed to disclose to us the abandonments when the Company issued 91,791.96 shares of common stock having a fair value of $24,264 ($0.26434 per share)acquired RBC in exchange for consulting services to be provided by Red Rock Servicing, Inc. (“Red Rock”).  Previous managementshares of the Company’s Common Stock. Mr. Page filed an answer denying the Company’s claims and asserted cross- and counterclaims against the Company determinedand several of the Company’s shareholders alleging breach of contract and fraud. In September 2021, Mr. Page voluntarily dismissed all of the counterclaims against the shareholders.

On June 7, 2022, RBC entered into a settlement agreement in the legal proceedings between the Company as plaintiff, and Joseph Page as defendant, whereunder Page surrendered 3,600,394 shares of the Company’s common stock, and kept 1,500,000 shares. Mr. Page represents and warrants that he has not filed or assisted anyone else in filing any patent applications that would preempt or infringe upon the Company’s patent applications. Plaintiff and defendant have each released their claims against each other and covenanted not to sue the other, including related parties and stakeholders, with the exclusion of current or future claims against EGS. The parties agreed to a Stipulated Dismissal of the Action with Prejudice filed with the court. In connection with this settlement, we recognized a gain of $540,059, calculated based on the Company’s share price of $0.15 per share on the date of settlement of the legal proceedings. This gain was recorded in other income for the three months ended June 30, 2022 in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

On March 2, 2021, we filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Ellenoff Grossman & Schole LLP (“EGS”) for negligence and legal malpractice, breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty. EGS had represented RBC prior to the Business Combination and represented us after the closing of the Business Combination through August 2019. In the litigation against Mr. Page, he has alleged that he provided information to an EGS partner that the contracted services were never performed,patent applications had been abandoned and demandedthat EGS failed to inform RBC and us of the fact. We are seeking damages and the return of such shares from Red Rock. The Company has issued stop-transfer instructions to its transfer agent, and has consistently excluded these shares fromlegal fees previously paid.

At the reported totaldate of its outstanding shares. Thethis report, the Company is currently engaged in a dispute regarding such shares with Red Rock and is indemnified with respectunable to such matter byestimate the former controlling shareholdersprobability success or dollar amount of the Company.  On November 4, 2015, the Company filed a civil actionrulings in the Third District Court, State of Utah, forMarch 2, 2021 case against EGS, and as a declaratory judgment thatresult, has not accrued any potential benefit to the consulting agreement was not valid and enforceable, for rescission of the agreement and the issuance of the shares, and for damages for fraud and negligent misrepresentation. The Company intendsCompany’s balance sheet. Attorney fees related to cancel these shares upon their return.proceedings are expensed as incurred.


ITEMItem 1A. RISK FACTORSRisk Factors

Not applicable.The Risk Factors identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2022 continue to represent the most significant risks to the Company’s future results of operations and financial conditions, without further modification or amendment.

ITEMItem 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDSUnregistered Sales of Equity Securities


Not applicable.We had no placements or sales of the Company’s equity securities during the three-month period ended June 30, 2022.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

Not applicable.

19 

ITEMItem 6. EXHIBITSExhibits

A list of exhibits required

Exhibit

No.

Description
3.1Conformed copy of Articles of Incorporation of RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc., as currently in effect - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment to Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed October 20, 2021.
3.2Amended and Restated Bylaws - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed June 9, 2018.
10.1Contribution Agreement by and among the Company, RocketFuel Blockchain Company, Joseph Page, Gert Funk, PacificWave Partners Limited, PacificWave Partners UK Ltd. and Saxton Capital Ltd, dated June 27, 2018 -  incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed June 29, 2018.
10.2Securities Purchase Agreement between Geneva Roth Remark Holdings, Inc. and RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc., dated August 4, 2021 - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed August 10, 2021.
10.3$130,000 Convertible Promissory Note between Geneva Roth Remark Holdings, Inc. and RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc., dated August 4, 2021 - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed August 10, 2021.
10.4Amended and Restated Subscription Agreement dated September 14, 2021 between the Company and G Kapital ApS - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed September 15, 2021.
10.5Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Agreement and Warrant dated October 11, 2021 - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed October 14, 2021.
31.1Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2Certification of the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INSXBRL Instance Document.
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CALXBRL Taxomony Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

20 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to be filed as part of this report is set forth in the Index to Exhibits, which is presented elsewhere in this document, and is incorporated herein by reference.




SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

RocketFuel Blockchain, Inc.

B4MC GOLD MINES, INC.

By:
/s/ Peter M. Jensen

(Registrant)

Peter M. Jensen

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  November 6, 2015

By:

(Principal Executive Officer)

By:/s/ BENNETT J. YANKOWITZ

Bennett J. Yankowitz

President and Treasurer

Bennett J. Yankowitz

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal ExecutiveFinancial and Financial /AccountingAccounting Officer)

Dated: August 18, 2022










INDEX TO EXHIBITS

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

Exhibit

Number

Description of Document

10.1

Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of May 7, 2015 between the Company and PacificWave Partners Limited, a Gibraltar company, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2015.

10.2*

Sub-Lease Agreement entered into on November 1, 2015 by and between Mostofi & Company, LLP and B4MC Gold Mines, Inc.

31.1*

Officer’s Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*

Officer’s Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS**

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.DEF**

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

21 

* Filed herewith.

 **In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information on Exhibit No. 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed “furnished” herewith not “filed.”





23