U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
| [X] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31,September 30, 2002
or
| [ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ___________ to __________
Commission file number 0-22686
PALATIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware | 95-4078884 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant's telephone number: (609) 520-1911495-2200
Check whether the IssuerRegistrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the IssuerRegistrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Check whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
As of May 15,November 14, 2002, 16,327,93218,968,086 shares of the issuer's common stock, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.
PALATIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Table of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
| Item 1. | Financial Statements (unaudited) | |
| CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS -- As of and June 30, | Page 3 | |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS -- For the Three | Page 4 | |
| CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS -- For the | Page 5 | |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | Page 6 | |
| Item 2. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | Page 10 |
| Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | Page |
| Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | Page 16 |
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
| Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | Page |
| Item 2. | Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds | Page |
| Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | Page |
| Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | Page |
| Item 5. | Other Information | Page |
| Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | Page |
| Signatures | Page | |
| Certifications of Executive Officers | Page 19 |
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
PALATIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(unaudited)
March 31,September 30, 2002 June 30, 2001
--------------2002
------------------ -------------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 10,651,9724,329,271 $ 11,456,4247,944,264
Accounts receivable 346,000 -
Prepaid expenses and other 215,591 204,731
------------- -------------247,719 349,883
-------------- --------------
Total current assets 10,867,563 11,661,1554,922,990 8,294,147
Property and equipment, net 2,024,548 1,924,9623,589,934 2,416,499
Restricted cash 613,075 613,075428,075 433,844
Investments 1,195,505 1,178,717
Other 187,098 45,017
------------- -------------32,507 35,009
-------------- --------------
$ 13,692,28410,169,011 $ 14,244,209
============= =============12,358,216
============== ==============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of capital lease obligations $ 140,035 $ -
Accounts payable $ 1,542,263 $ 1,129,6602,066,555 1,579,336
Accrued expenses 850,974 397,119447,951 661,883
Accrued compensation 177,086 607,286- 236,200
Accrued litigation settlement 150,000 400,000
Deferred license revenue 69,443 166,666
------------- -------------916,514 794,018
-------------- --------------
Total current liabilities 2,639,766 2,300,731
------------- -------------
Deferred license revenue3,721,055 3,671,437
-------------- --------------
Long term capital lease obligations 186,491 -
27,778
------------- --------------------------- --------------
Commitments and contingencies (Note 4)
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock of $.01 par value - authorized 10,000,000 shares;
Series A Convertible; 26,567 and 29,317shares26,192 shares issued and outstanding
as of March 31,September 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001,2002, respectively; 266 293262 262
Series C Convertible; 700,000 shares issued and outstanding
as of March 31,September 30, 2002 and June 30, 20012002, respectively; 7,000 7,000
Common stock of $.01 par value - authorized 75,000,000 shares;
16,173,788Issued and 11,199,658 issuedoutstanding 18,968,090 and outstanding17,423,076 shares as of
March 31,September 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001,2002, respectively; 161,738 111,997189,681 174,231
Additional paid-in capital 76,138,681 65,981,56880,442,971 78,792,240
Deferred compensation (39,688) (80,119)
Unrealized loss on investments (1,198) -(57,831) (53,942)
Accumulated other comprehensive income 22,104 10,604
Deficit accumulated during development stage (65,214,281) (54,105,039)
------------- -------------
Total stockholders' equity 11,052,518 11,915,700
------------- -------------(74,342,722) (70,243,616)
-------------- --------------
6,261,465 8,686,779
-------------- --------------
$ 13,692,28410,169,011 $ 14,244,209
============= =============12,358,216
============== ==============
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
Inception
Three Months Ended September 30, (January 28, 1986)
Three Months Ended March 31, Nine Months Ended March 31,-------------------------------- through
2002 2001 2002 2001 March 31,September 30, 2002
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ --------------------------------
REVENUES:
Grants and contracts $ 57,772425,000 $ 101,551- $ 57,772 $ 1,621,425 $ 9,600,93710,049,094
License fees and royalties 198,505 41,667 41,667 125,001 125,001 2,025,9642,299,894
Other - - - - 318,917
------------ ------------ -------------
------------ -------------
Total revenues 99,439 143,218 182,773 1,746,426 11,945,818623,505 41,667 12,667,905
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ -------------
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Research and development 3,537,765 2,423,701 8,889,591 7,128,819 51,745,8783,588,525 2,101,461 58,561,838
General and administrative 1,123,885 589,535 3,039,047 2,139,584 25,416,1621,179,627 899,899 28,560,885
Net intangibles write down - - - - 259,334
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ -------------
Total operating expenses 4,661,650 3,013,236 11,928,638 9,268,403 77,421,3744,768,152 3,001,360 87,382,057
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ -------------
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES):
Interest income 64,527 264,710 246,587 631,197 2,388,15246,504 102,087 2,500,083
Interest expense (1,018) (558) (2,374) (4,187) (1,958,328)(963) (678) (1,960,104)
Merger costs - - - - (525,000)
------------ ------------ -------------
------------ -------------
Total other income income/(expenses) 63,509 264,152 244,213 627,010 (95,176)45,541 101,409 14,979
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ -------------
Loss before income taxes and cumulative
effect of accounting change (4,498,702) (2,605,866) (11,501,652) (6,894,967) (65,570,732)(4,099,106) (2,858,284) (74,699,173)
Income tax benefit 230,400 - 392,410 325,152- 717,562
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ -------------
Loss before cumulative effect of
accounting change (4,268,302) (2,605,866) (11,109,242) (6,569,815) (64,853,170)(4,099,106) (2,858,284) (73,981,611)
Cumulative effect of accounting change - - - (361,111) (361,111)
------------ ------------ -------------
------------ -------------
NET LOSS (4,268,302) (2,605,866) (11,109,242) (6,930,926) (65,214,281)(4,099,106) (2,858,284) (74,342,722)
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND (17,459) - - (285,725) - (3,407,250)(3,326,086)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ -------------
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON
STOCKHOLDERS $(4,268,302) $(2,605,866) $(11,394,967) $(6,930,926) $(68,621,531)$(4,116,565) $(2,858,284) $(77,668,808)
============ ============ ============= ============ =============
Basic and diluted net loss per common share:
Basic and diluted net loss before cumulative
effect of accounting changeshare $ (0.22) $ (0.26)
$ (0.24) $ (0.85) $ (0.67)
Cumulative effect of accounting change $ (0.00) $ (0.00) $ (0.00) $ (0.04)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------
Basic and diluted net loss $ (0.26) $ (0.24) $ (0.85) $ (0.71)
============ ============ ============= ============
Weighted average number of common shares
outstanding used in computing basic and
diluted net loss per common share 16,140,790 11,000,017 13,431,685 9,794,35618,497,853 11,199,611
============ ============ ============= ============
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
Inception
(January 28,1986)
NineThree Months Ended March 31,September 30, (January 28, 1986)
-------------------------------- Through
2002 2001 March 31,September 30, 2002
------------- ------------ -------------------------- ------------------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss $(11,109,242) $(6,930,926) $(65,214,281)$(4,099,106) $(2,858,284) $(74,342,722)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used for operating activities:
Cumulative effect of accounting change - 361,111- 361,111
Depreciation and amortization 865,754 230,891 2,239,610154,564 287,678 2,685,294
License fee - - 500,000
Interest expense on note payable - - 72,691
Accrued interest on long-term financing - - 796,038
Accrued interest on short-term financing - - 7,936
Intangibles and equipment write down - - 278,318
Common stock and notes payable issued for expenses - - 751,038
Settlement with consultant - - (28,731)
Acceleration of options previously granted - 335,315- 1,505,315
Stock based compensation 40,431 109,375 3,651,347(3,889) 15,288 4,393,892
Deferred revenue (125,001) (125,001) (291,668)122,496 (41,667) 555,403
Changes in certain operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (346,000) - 761,088 -(346,000)
Prepaid expenses and other (160,448) 497,948 (1,345,880)107,933 (22,982) (1,043,420)
Accounts payable 412,603 (280,815) 1,542,263487,219 (227,332) 2,066,555
Accrued expenses and other 23,657 49,680 566,894(700,132) 158,137 136,784
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ --------------
Net cash used for operating activities (10,052,246) (4,991,334) (54,607,999)(4,276,915) (2,689,162) (61,650,498)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ --------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Sales/(Purchases)Purchases of short-term investments net(5,288) - 2,155,617 -(1,177,295)
Purchases of property and equipment (956,814) (578,095) (4,130,039)(907,577) (146,724) (5,715,312)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ --------------
Net cash provided/(used)used for investing activities (956,814) 1,577,522 (4,130,039)(912,865) (146,724) (6,892,607)
------------ ------------ ------------- ------------ --------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from notes payable, related party - - 302,000
Payments on notes payable, related party - - (302,000)
Proceeds from senior bridge notes payable - - 1,850,000
Payments on senior bridge notes payable - - (1,850,000)
Payments on capital lease obligations (91,394) - (91,394)
Proceeds from notes payable and long-term debt - - 3,951,327
Payments on notes payable and long-term debt - - (1,951,327)
Proceeds from Common stock, stock option
and warrant issuances, net 10,204,608 15,005,138 43,181,3511,666,181 - 46,755,111
Proceeds from Preferred stock, net - - 24,210,326
Purchase of treasury stock - - (1,667)
------------- ------------ -------------------------- -------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 10,204,608 15,005,138 69,390,0101,574,787 - 72,872,376
------------ ------------ -------------
------------ --------------
NET INCREASE/INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (804,452) 11,591,326 10,651,972(3,614,993) (2,835,886) 4,329,271
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning
of period 7,944,264 11,456,424 3,219,593 -
------------- ------------ -------------------------- -------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period $ 10,651,972 $14,810,9194,329,271 $ 10,651,972
=============8,620,538 $ 4,329,271 $
============ ============ =============
The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these financial statements.
5
Nature of Business – Palatin Technologies, Inc. (“Palatin”("Palatin" or the “Company”"Company") is a development-stage biopharmaceuticalbio-pharmaceutical company. The Company does not currently offer any products for sale.The Company is currently conducting clinical investigations with its lead drug, PT-141, for the treatment of erectilemale and female sexual dysfunction, and is developing additional therapeutic compounds, discovered using its enabling peptide platform technology, MIDAS™MIDAS(TM). Additionally, Palatin is developing a product for infection imaging, LeuTech®LeuTech(R), based on a proprietary radiolabeled monoclonal antibody.
Business Risk and Liquidity – As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company incurred substantial net losses of $11,109,242$4,099,106 for the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2002 and has a deficit accumulated during development stage of $65,214,281$74,342,722, cash and cash equivalents of $4,329,271 and investments of $1,195,505 as of March 31,September 30, 2002. The Company anticipates incurring substantial additional losses in the future as it continues development of LeuTech for equivocal appendicitis and expands clinical trials for other indications of LeuTech and for PT-141, and continues research and development of PT-141 and its MIDAS technology. To achieve profitability, the Company, alone or with others, must successfully develop and commercialize its technologies and proposed products, conductby conducting pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, obtainobtaining required regulatory approvals and successfully manufacturemanufacturing and marketmarketing such technologies and proposed products. The time required to reach profitability is highly uncertain, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to achieve profitability on a sustained basis, if at all.
The Company has incurred negative cash flows from operations since its inception, the Company has expended and expects to continue to expend in the future, substantial funds to complete its planned product development efforts. The Company expects that its existing capital resources will be adequate to fund the Company's projected operations through December 2002, based on current expenditure levels. No assurance can be given that the Company will not consume a significant amount of its available resources before that time. Management plans to continue to refine its operations, control expenses, evaluate alternative methods to conduct its business, and seek available and attractive sources of financing and sharing of development costs through strategic collaboration agreements or other resources. Based on the Company's historical ability to raise capital, management believes that through one or a combination of such factors that it will obtain adequate financing to fund the Company's operations through fiscal year 2003, based on current expenditure levels. Should appropriate sources of financing not be available, management would delay certain clinical trials and research activities until such time as appropriate financing was available. There can be no assurance that the Company's financing efforts will be successful. If adequate funds are not available, the Company's financial condition and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected, and the Company may be forced to cease operations.
These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
6
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnote disclosures required to be presented for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary to present fairly the financial position as of March 31,September 30, 2002 and the results of operations and cash flows for the three and nine month periodsperiod ended March 31,September 30, 2002 and 2001 and for the period from inception (JanuaryJanuary 28, 1986)1986 (inception) to March 31,September 30, 2002. The results of operations for the ninethree month period ended March 31,September 30, 2002 may not necessarily be indicative of the results of operations expected for the full year, except that the Company expects to incur a significant loss for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2002.2003.
The accompanying financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which includes financial statements as of June 30, 2002 and 2001 and 2000.
6
Tablefor each of Contentsthe three fiscal years in the period ended June 30, 2002.
Principles of Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Palatin and its wholly-ownedwholly owned inactive subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates – The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted accounting principlesin the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and contingent liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Statements of Cash Flows –Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash in banks and all highly liquid investments with aan original maturity of less than three months or less at the time of purchase.months. As of March 31,September 30, 2002 and June 30, 2001,2002, approximately $613,000$428,000 and $434,000, respectively, of cash was restricted to secure letters of credit for security deposits on leases. In September 2002, the Company acquired $417,920 of equipment under capital leases..
Investments – We accountThe Company accounts for its investments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115 “Accounting"Accounting For Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” We classify" The Company classifies such investments as available for sale investments and as such all investments are recorded at fair value. The investments consist of commercial paper.paper and government bonds. Unrealized gains and losses are classified as a separate component of stockholder'sstockholders' equity. Realized gains and losses are recorded in the statement of operations in the period that the transaction occurs.
7
Property and Equipment – Property and equipment consistconsists of office and laboratory equipment, office furniture and leasehold improvements. Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is recognized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of five years for equipment, seven years for office furniture and over the term of the lease for leasehold improvements. Maintenance and repairs are expensedcharged to expense as incurred while expenditures that extend the useful life of an asset are capitalized.
During 2001, the Company entered into an agreement to lease a new facility in Cranbury, New Jersey that will combine both the research and development facility in Edison, New Jersey and the corporate offices in Princeton, New Jersey. The lease will expire 10 years from commencement.Impairment of Long-Lived Assets – The Company anticipates occupyingreviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the new space incarrying amount of the second quarterassets may not be fully recoverable. To determine recoverability of calendar year 2002. In connection with this move,its long-lived assets, management evaluates the Company has re-evaluated the useful life of certain existing leasehold improvements at its Edison, New Jersey facility suchprobability that theyfuture undiscounted net cash flows, without interest charges, will be depreciated through June 30, 2002, whenless than the Company anticipates vacating this facility. This change in estimate resulted in increased depreciation expense of approximately $635,000 in the statement of operations during the nine months ended March 31, 2002 as compared to the same period in 2001.
In our September 30 and December 31, 2001 Form 10-Qs, we previously recorded a charge of $916,518 related to the impairmentcarrying amount of the leasehold improvementsassets. Impairment is measured at our Edison, New Jersey facility. Given that we are still utilizing that facility through June 2002,fair value. Fair value is determined by an impairment charge should not have been taken as previously reported, but rather a change inevaluation of available price information at which assets could be bought or sold including quoted market prices, if available, or the remaining estimated useful lifepresent value of the leasehold improvements, as discussed above, should have been made. Our results of operations as presented in the accompanying statements of operations for the threeestimated future discounted cash flows based on reasonable and nine months ended March 31, 2002 reflect the appropriate accounting for the change in estimate. Had we accounted for the change in estimate accurately, our previously reported net
7
Table of Contentssupportable assumptions.
loss for the three months ended September 30, 2001 and six months ended December 31, 2001 would have been lower by $744,133 and $496,089, respectively.
Revenue Recognition – Grant and contract revenues are recognized as the Company provides the services stipulated in the underlying grants and/or contracts based on the time and materials incurred. License revenues are recognized when the license fee is received and the Company has no future performance obligations.
In August 1999, the Company entered into a strategic collaboration agreement with Mallinckrodt, Inc. a division of Tyco International. Ltd., to jointly develop and market one of its products. Under the terms of the agreement, the company granted a worldwide license, excluding Europe, for sales, marketing and distribution and received a nonrefundable licensing fee of $500,000. The licensing fee was recognized as revenue in the period that such nonrefundable fees were received.
In fiscal year ended June 30, 2001, the Company adopted U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 “Revenue"Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” (“Statements" ("SAB 101”101"). SAB 101 which requires up front, non-refundable license fees to be deferred and recognized over the performance period. The cumulative effect of adopting SAB 101 resulted in a one-time non-cash charge of $361,000, or $0.04 per share during$361,111, which reflects the deferral of the $500,000 up-front license fee received from Mallinckrodt in August 1999. Under SAB 101, this payment has been recorded as deferred revenue to be recognized as license revenue over the remaining development term of this agreement. For the three months ended September 30, 2000. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company recognized $13,891 and $41,667, and $125,001 of deferredrespectively in license revenue respectively.that was included in the cumulative effect adjustment as of July 1, 2000.
In May 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with Mallinckrodt to amend the original agreement. Under the terms of this amended agreement, Mallinckrodt committed, among other things, up to an additional $3.2 million, subject to certain conditions and attainment of certain milestones, to cover half of the Company's estimated expenses associated with completing the FDA review process of LeuTech. Pursuant to this amendment, $800,000 was received upon execution of this agreement. Under SAB 101, this payment has been recorded as deferred revenue to be recognized as license revenue over the remaining development term of this agreement. The Company recognized $184,614 as license revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2002.
Research and Development Costs – The costs of research and development activities are charged to expense as incurred.
8
Stock Options and Warrants – Warrants and theThe Company has issued a majority of its outstanding common stock options issued to employees and non-employee directors, have been issued at exercise prices greater than, or equal to, theirthe fair market value atof the Company's common stock on the date granted. Accordingly, no value has been assigned to these options. However,The Company has granted stock options were granted to non-employees for services. The fair value of these options, pursuant to the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (“("SFAS 123”123"), as calculated by the Black-Scholes option pricing model, has been recorded as deferred compensation and is being expensed over the vesting period of such options. During the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2002, the Company recognized $9,855 and $40,431$17,889 of stock-based compensation expense, respectively.deferred compensation.
Income Taxes – The Company and its subsidiaries file consolidated federal and combined state income tax returns. The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, “Accounting"Accounting for Income Taxes” (“Taxes" ("SFAS 109”109"). SFAS 109 requires, among other things, the use of the liability method in computing deferred income taxes.
The Company provides for deferred income taxes relating to temporary differences in the recognition of income and expense items (primarily relating to depreciation, amortization and certain leases) for financial and tax reporting purposes. Such amounts are measured using current tax laws and regulations in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 109.
In accordance with SFAS 109, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance against the realization of its deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance is based on management’smanagement's estimates and analysis, which includes tax laws which may limit the Company’sCompany's ability to utilize its tax loss carry-forwards.
Net Loss per Common Share – The Company applies Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, “Earnings"Earnings per Share” (“Share" ("SFAS 128”128"). SFAS 128 requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”("EPS") for complex capital structures on the face of the statement of operations. Basic EPS is computed by dividing the income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution from the exercise or conversion of securities into Common stock, such as stock options. For the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2002 and 2001, there were no dilutive effects of stock options or warrants as the Company incurred a net loss in each period. Options and warrants to purchase 8,909,7159,454,119 shares of Common Stock at prices ranging from $0.01 to $360$21.70 per share were outstanding at March 31,September 30, 2002.
8Fair Value of Financial Instruments – Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107 "Disclosure about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“SFAS 107”), requires disclosures of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate the value. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. These techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument. SFAS 107 excludes certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.
9
Leases – The Company currently leases two facilities in New Jersey under non-cancelable operating leases.
During 2001,leases and is seeking to terminate one of those leases, for the Company's former corporate offices in Princeton. In July 2002, the Company enteredmoved into an agreement to lease a new facility in Cranbury, New Jersey that will combinecombined both the research and development facility formerly in Edison, New Jersey and the corporate offices formerly in Princeton, New Jersey. ThePrinceton.
As of June 30, 2002, the Company anticipates occupying the new spacehad recorded approximately $116,000 in the second quarter of calendar year 2002. The Company’s anticipated cash outlayaccruals related to the move is projected at approximately $1.6 million.estimated costs to terminate the Princeton lease. As of September 30, 2002, $100,000 of this accrual remains payable.
Capital Leases – In September 2002, the Company acquired $417,920 of equipment under capital leases. The term of these leases range from 24 to 60 months. As of September 30, 2002, $326,526 remains outstanding pursuant to these lease obligations.
License Agreements – The Company has three license agreements that require minimum annualyearly payments. The cost to maintain these license agreements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 20022003 amounts to $300,000. DuringThere were no payments due during the three months ended March 31, 2002, $50,000 was expensed and an aggregate of $300,000 was expensed during the nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2002 under these agreements.
(5) Stockholders’ Equity:
In November 2001,Legal Proceedings – Following the termination of the Company's proposed merger with San Diego-based Molecular Biosystems, Inc. in March 2000, Molecular Biosystems commenced a legal action against the Company, concluded a private placement of its common stock and warrants, which yielded gross proceeds of $11 million. Investors purchased 4,902,481 shares of common stock and 1,225,623 warrants at a market value of approximately $2.25 per share. For every four shares purchased,seeking damages arising from the investors also received a five-year warrant. Each warrant entitles the purchaser to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of approximately $2.70 per share. Based on the sales pricealleged improper termination of the common stock and warrantsmerger agreement. The Company denied the material allegations. In August 2002, in this private placement,order to avoid the conversion priceongoing costs of the Company’s outstanding Series A Preferred Stocklitigation and consumption of the exercise price of certain outstanding warrants have been adjusted downward in accordance with the existing terms of those securities. As a result, a non-cash, deemed dividend of $285,725 has been reflected in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations during the three months ended December 31, 2001.
(6) Income Tax Benefit:
In December 2001 and February 2002,Company's time, the Company sold New Jersey Net Operating Losses pursuant tosettled this litigation with Molecular Biosystems for $400,000 which was accrued for as of June 30, 2002. As of September 30, 2002, $150,000 of the New Jersey Economic Development Agency's Tax Transfer Program. As a result,accrual remained payable, which the Company received an aggregate $392,410, which is reflected as an income tax benefit in the statement of operations.
(7) Subsequent Event:has since paid.
On May 13, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with Mallinckrodt, Inc., a division of Tyco International, Ltd., to amend the Strategic Collaboration Agreement dated as of August 17, 1999. Under the terms of the original agreement, in addition to other provisions, Mallinckrodt agreed to pay Palatin a licensing fee of $500,000 and an additional $13 million to purchase 700,000 restricted unregistered shares of Palatin preferred stock. LeuTech development expenses prior to approval were equally shared. Milestone payments of an additional $10 million were to be paid on FDA approval of the first LeuTech indication and on
9
attainment of certain sales goals following product launch. Palatin would manufacture LeuTech and receive a transfer price on each product unit and a royalty on LeuTech net sales.
Under the terms of the amended agreement, Mallinckrodt has committed up to an additional $3.2 million to cover half of Palatin’s estimated expenses associated with completing the FDA review process. This additional funding is conditioned upon attainment of certain milestones, and Palatin will receive $800,000 of such amount within ten days of the execution of the amendment. Additionally, the $10 million milestone payment schedule to Palatin has been revised to coincide with LeuTech®’s anticipated marketing approval and achievement of future sales goals.
General
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes filed as part of this report.
We make forward-looking statements in this report. Sometimes these statements contain words such as "anticipates," "plans," "intends," "expects" and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of our future performance. Our business involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from what we say in this report. We describe severala number of these factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2001.2002. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We may not revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
10
We expect to incuranticipate incurring substantial additional losses inover at least the futurenext several years, and we expect our losses to increase as we continue development of LeuTech for equivocal appendicitis and expand clinical trials for other indications of LeuTech and for PT-141, and continueour research and development ofactivities relating to LeuTech, PT-141 and our MIDAS technology. Operating losses may fluctuate from quarter to quarter as a result of differences in the timing of when we incur expenses.
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in this report. We believe our most critical accounting policy is revenue recognition. Revenue from corporate collaborations and licensing agreements consists of up-front fees, research and development funding, and milestone payments. Non-refundable up-front fees are deferred and amortized to revenue over the related performance period. We estimate our performance period as the initial research term. The actual performance period may vary. We will adjust the performance period estimate based upon available facts and circumstances. Periodic payments for research and development activities and government grants are recognized over the period that we perform the related activities under the terms of the agreements. Revenue resulting from the achievement of milestone events stipulated in the agreements is recognized when we have adequate evidence that the milestone is deemed to be substantive.
We are an emerginga development-stage pharmaceutical company committed to the discovery, development and commercialization of novel therapeutics. We do not currently offer any products for sale. We are concentrating our efforts on the following:
1011
Three and Nine Month PeriodsPeriod Ended March 31,September 30, 2002 Compared to Three and Nine Month PeriodsPeriod Ended March 31,September 30, 2001.
Grants and Contracts – There was noFor the three months ended September 30, 2002, we recognized $425,000 in contract revenue related to the shared development costs of LeuTech pursuant to our collaboration agreement with Mallinckrodt, Inc., recordeda division of Tyco International, Ltd. There was no such revenue for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2002 compared to $22,276 and $1,410,356, respectively, for the three and nine month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2001. The decreaseincrease in contract revenue was attributable to the cap onadditional shared development costs of LeuTech pursuant to the amended agreement. Grant(See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements) We had no revenue under both the Small Business Innovation Research and the Small Business Technology Transfer programs of the Department of Health and Human Services, decreased to $57,772 for both the three and nine months ended March 31, 2002 compared to $79,275 and $211,069, respectively,from grants recorded for the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2002 and September 30, 2001.
12
License Fees and Royalties – During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2001, we adopted U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 “Revenue"Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” (“Statements" ("SAB 101”101"), which requires up-front, non-refundable license fees to be deferred and recognized over the performance period. Accordingly, theThe cumulative effect of adopting SAB 101 resulted in a one-time, non-cash charge of $361,111 in fiscal 2001, which reflectedreflects the deferral portion of an up-front license fee received from Mallinkrodt, Inc. related to licensing of LeuTech recognized in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2000. Previously we had recognized up-front license fees when they were received and we had no obligations to return the fees under any circumstances. Under SAB 101 these payments are recorded as deferred revenue to be recognized over the remaining term of the related agreements. For the three and nine months ended March 31,September 30, 2002, and 2001, we recorded $41,667 and $125,001, respectively,$198,505 of license revenue, $13,891 of which was included in the cumulative effect adjustment as of July 1, 2000 and $184,614 was recorded as a result of the initial $800,000 payment received from Mallinckrodt pursuant to our amended collaboration agreement in May 2002. We recorded $41,667 of license revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2001 that was included in the cumulative effect adjustment as of July 1, 2000.
11
Research and development – Research and development expenses ("R&D") increased to $3,537,765 and $8,889,591, respectively,$3,588,525 for the three and nine month periodsmonths ended March 31,September 30, 2002 compared to $2,423,701 and $7,128,819, respectively,$2,101,461 for the three and nine month periodsmonths ended March 31,September 30, 2001. The increase in research and development expensesR&D is primarily related to theour increased development efforts and expanding clinical trials and development efforts of PT-141 and ourLeuTech. Our R&D efforts, and their respective allocated costs, are currently concentrated on the following:
| • | PT-141:through September 30, 2002, we have incurred approximately $15.0 million in allocated R&D expenses. For the three months ended September 30, 2002, $1,911,248 of R&D expense was allocated to PT-141 compared to $1,062,214 for the three months ended September 30, 2001. We anticipate incurring approximately $9 million over the next 12 months as we initiate various Phase 2 efficacy studies in both male and female patients. We believe commercialization will require approximately three years of further research, development and testing at an estimated cost of $75 million. We will seek to enter into a strategic collaboration agreement, which would offset a significant portion of the estimated costs. |
| • | LeuTech:through September 30, 2002, we have incurred approximately $36.3 million in allocated R&D expenses. For the three months ended September 30, 2002, $1,024,334 of R&D expense was allocated to LeuTech compared to $662,513 for the three months ended September 30, 2001. Currently, we are in the process of resolving outstanding FDA issues and we intend to file an amendment to the Biologics License Application for equivocal appendicitis later this calendar year or the first quarter of calendar year 2003. We are also currently conducting various Phase 2 studies with respect to other infection indications. We anticipate incurring approximately $5.0 million in additional R&D expenses prior to the market launch of LeuTech, which we expect to occur in the second half of calendar year 2003, pending FDA approval. We cannot know for certain whether the FDA will approve LeuTech. |
13
General and administrative – General and administrative expenses increased to $1,123,885 and $3,039,047, respectively,$1,179,627 for the three and nine month periods
months ended March 31,September 30, 2002 compared to $589,535 and $2,139,584, respectively,$899,899 for the three and nine month periodsmonths ended March 31,September 30, 2001. The increase in general and administrative expenses is primarilymainly attributable to an increase in professional fees mainly related to legal fees and the increase in salaries and related personnel expenses. We anticipate that this trendexpenses and the costs associated with the consolidation and move of our previous locations in legal expensesNew Jersey to level off later this calendar year.Cranbury, New Jersey.
Interest income – Interest income decreased to $64,527 and $246,587, respectively,$46,504 for the three and nine month periodsmonths ended March 31,September 30, 2002 compared to $264,710 and $631,197, respectively,$102,087 for the three and nine month periodsmonths ended March 31,September 30, 2001. The decrease in interest income is mainly attributabledue to the amount of fundslower cash, cash equivalents and investments available for investment purposes during the periodsto be invested and lower interest rates of return during 2002.on the Company's investments.
Net loss – Net loss increased to $4,268,302 and $11,109,242, respectively,$4,099,106 for the three and nine month periodsmonths ended March 31,September 30, 2002 compared to $2,605,866 and $6,930,926, respectively,$2,858,284 for the three and nine month periodsmonths ended March 31,September 30, 2001. The increase was primarily attributable to the increase in expenses and decrease in revenues explained above and the increase in depreciation expenses related to our leasehold improvements of approximately $650,000, pursuant to our planned move to Cranbury, New Jersey. (See Note 3).above.
Since inception, we have incurred net operating losses. As of March 31,September 30, 2002, we had a deficit accumulated during development stage of $65,214,281.$74,342,722. We have financed our net operating losses through March 31,September 30, 2002 by a series of debt and equity financings. At March 31,September 30, 2002, we had cash and cash equivalents of $10,651,972.$4,329,271 and investments of $1,195,505.
Our product candidates are at various stages of research and development and may never be successfully developed or commercialized. We will need regulatory approval to market and sell LeuTech for diagnosis of appendicitis or for any other indication. PT-141 and MIDAS will require significant further research, development and testing. We may experience uncertainties, delays, difficulties and expenses commonly experienced by early stage bio-pharmaceutical companies, which may include unanticipated problems and additional costs relating to:
| • | the development and testing of products in animals and humans; |
| • | product approval or clearance; |
| • | regulatory compliance; |
| • | good manufacturing practices; |
| • | product introduction; and |
| • | marketing and competition. |
14
Failure to obtain regulatory approval of LeuTech, or delays in obtaining regulatory approval of LeuTech, would eliminate or delay our potential revenues from sales of LeuTech. This could make it more difficult to attract investment capital for funding our other research and development projects. Any of these possibilities could materially and adversely affect our operations.
For the ninethree months ended March 31,September 30, 2002, the net decrease in cash was $804,452.$3,614,993. Net cash used for operating activities was $10,052,246,$4,276,915 and net cash used byfor investing activities was $956,814$912,865 and net cash provided by financing activities was $10,204,608.$1,574,787.
In November 2001,July 2002, we concluded areceived gross proceeds of $1.8 million pursuant to the second tranche of the Spring 2002 private placement of our common stock and warrants, which yielded gross proceedswarrants. Investors, consisting of $11 million. Investorsdomestic and European financial institutions and other domestic accredited investors, purchased 4,902,481approximately 1.5 million shares of common stock and 1,225,623 warrantsshares at a market value of approximately $2.25$1.17 per share. For every fourfive shares purchased, the investors also received a five-year warrant. Each warrant entitles the purchaser to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of approximately $2.70$1.46 per share. The net proceeds of $10.2approximately $1.7 million are beingwill be used primarily for general corporate purposes, includingespecially for the development and clinical trials of new products based on certain of our proprietary technologies.
On May 13,July 17, 2002, we enteredmoved into an agreement with Mallinckrodt, Inc.our new leased facility of approximately 28,000 square feet in Cranbury, New Jersey that combines both the research and development facility formerly located in Edison, New Jersey and the corporate offices formerly located in Princeton, New Jersey. During the three months ended September 30, 2002, approximately $900,000 was used for capital expenditures. Minimum annual future lease payments escalate from approximately $920,000 per year to amend the Strategic Collaboration Agreement dated as of August 17, 1999. Under the terms of the amended
12
agreement, Mallinckrodt has committed up to an additional $3.2 million to cover half of Palatin's estimated expenses associated with completing the FDA review process. This additional funding is conditioned upon attainment of certain milestones, and Palatin$1,550,000 per year. The lease will receive $800,000 of such amount within ten days of the execution of the amendment. Additionally, the $10 million milestone payment schedule to Palatin has been revised to coincide with LeuTech's anticipated marketing approval and achievement of future sales goals.expire in July 2012.
We have three license agreements that require minimum yearly payments. Future minimum payments under the license agreements are: 2002 - $300,000, 2003 - $300,000, 2004 - $200,000, 2005 - $200,000, 2006 - $200,000 and 20062007 - $200,000.
During 2001, we entered into an agreementWe are and expect to lease a new facility totaling 28,000 square feet in Cranbury, New Jersey that will combine both the researchcontinue actively searching for certain products and development facility in Edison, New Jersey and the corporate offices in Princeton, New Jersey. We anticipate occupying the new spacetechnologies to license or acquire, now or in the second quarter of calendar year 2002. Our anticipated initial cash outlay related tofuture. If we are successful in identifying a product or technology for acquisition, we may require substantial funds for such an acquisition and subsequent development or commercialization. We do not know whether any acquisition will be consummated in the move is projected at $1.6 million.future.
We have incurred negative cash flows from operations since our inception, and have expended, and expect to continue to expend in the future, substantial funds to complete our planned product development efforts. We expect that our existing capital resources will be adequate to fund our projected operations through December 2002, based on current expenditure levels. We plan to continue to refine our operations, control
expenses, evaluate alternative methods to conduct our business and seek available and attractive sources of financing and sharing of development costs through strategic collaboration agreements or other resources. We expectBased on our existinghistorical ability to raise capital, resources, along with the additional funds anticipated from Mallinckrodt,we believe that through one or a combination of such factors, we will beobtain adequate financing to fund our projected operations through calendarfiscal year 2002,2003, based on current expenditure levels. There can be no assurance that our financing efforts will be successful. If adequate funds are not available, our financial condition and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected, and we may be forced to cease operations.
15
We anticipate incurring substantial additional losses over at least the next several years, and we expect our losses to increase as we expand our research and development activities relating to LeuTech, PT-141andPT-141 and our MIDAS technology. To achieve profitability, we, alone or with others, must successfully develop and commercialize our technologies and proposed products, conductby conducting pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, obtainobtaining required regulatory approvals and successfully manufacturemanufacturing and marketmarketing such technologies and proposed products. The time required to reach profitability is highly uncertain, and we do not know whether we will be able to achieve profitability on a sustained basis, if at all.
Interest Rate Risk. Our exposure to market risk related to changes in interest rates relates primarily to our investment portfolio. We invest in instruments that meet high credit quality standards, and we limit the amount of credit exposure as to any one issue, issuer and type of investments.
As of March 31,September 30, 2002, our cash, and cash equivalents and investments consisted of $10,651,972,$5,524,776, most of which were short term investments having an original maturity of less than three months. Due to the average maturity and conservative nature of our investment portfolio, we do not believe that short-term fluctuationsinshort term fluctuations in interest rates would materially affect the value of our securities.
13Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Within the 90 days before we filed this report, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c)). Based on their evaluation, they concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and effective to ensure that other persons within Palatin and its consolidated subsidiaries informed those officers in a timely manner of material information relating to Palatin and its subsidiaries, particularly during the period in which we were preparing this report.
Changes in Internal Controls. There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation. There were no significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal controls. Accordingly, we did not require or undertake any corrective actions.
16
On March 14, 2000, we announced that we would not be extending the merger closing date of March 31, 2000 for our previously announced proposed merger with San Diego-based Molecular Biosystems, Inc. and will not be proceeding with the merger. Our decision not to proceed with the merger was based on management's view that the merger was not in the best interests of our stockholders.None.
On or about April 28, 2000, Molecular Biosystems commenced a legal action against us and against Evergreen Merger Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, in the Superior Court of the State of Delaware, County of New Castle. In the complaint, Molecular Biosystems seeks damages against us and Evergreen arising from the alleged improper termination of the merger agreement dated November 11, 1999, among Molecular Biosystems, Palatin and Evergreen. Under the merger agreement, Evergreen would have merged with and into Molecular Biosystems, which would have become a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours.
As a consequence of the claims alleged in the complaint, Molecular Biosystems contends that it is entitled to an award of damages against us and Evergreen in amounts to be determined at trial, but in any event, at least equal to $1,765,305. This figure represents the amount of a “breakup fee” of $1,000,000 provided for in the agreement and $765,305 for the purported costs and expenses allegedly incurred by Molecular Biosystems in connection with the proposed merger. In addition, Molecular Biosystems seeks consequential damages in an unstated amount plus interest and Molecular Biosystems' costs and expenses of the action.
In our response filed in June of 2000, we have denied the material allegations. Management believes that we have good and meritorious defenses to the action and we intend vigorously to defend the action. On January 3, 2001, Alliance Pharmaceutical Corp. (NASDAQ: ALLP) announced that it had completed its acquisition of Molecular Biosystems. This litigation is currently in the discovery and deposition phase.
None.In July 2002, we received gross proceeds of $1.8 million pursuant to the second tranche of the Spring 2002 private placement of common stock and warrants. Investors, consisting of domestic and European financial institutions and other domestic accredited investors, purchased approximately 1.5 million shares of common stock shares at $1.17 per share. For every five shares purchased, the investors also received a five-year warrant to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $1.46 per share. The net proceeds of approximately $1.7 million are being used primarily for general corporate purposes, specifically for the development and clinical trials of new products based on our proprietary technologies.
None.
None.
Subsequent Event:
On May 13, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement with Mallinckrodt, Inc., a division of Tyco International, Ltd., to amend the Strategic Collaboration Agreement dated asNone.
14
of August 17, 1999. Under the terms of the original agreement, in addition to other provisions, Mallinckrodt agreed to pay Palatin a licensing fee of $500,000 and an additional $13 million to purchase 700,000 restricted unregistered shares of Palatin preferred stock. LeuTech development expenses prior to approval are equally shared. Milestone payments of an additional $10 million were to be paid on FDA approval of the first LeuTech indication and on attainment of certain sales goals following product launch. Palatin would manufacture LeuTech and receive a transfer price on each product unit and a royalty on LeuTech net sales.
Under the terms of the amended agreement, Mallinckrodt has committed up to an additional $3.2 million to cover half of Palatin’s estimated expenses associated with completing the FDA review process. This additional funding is conditioned upon attainment of certain milestones, and Palatin will receive $800,000 of such amount within ten days of the execution of the amendment. Additionally, the $10 million milestone payment schedule to Palatin has been revised to coincide with LeuTech®’s anticipated marketing approval and achievement of future sales goals.
(a) Exhibits filed with this report:
| Certification by CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of | ||
| 99.2 | Certification by CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
15 During the quarter ended September 30, 2002, we filed two reports on Form 8-K:
17
| • | The first report, dated August 2 and filed on August 8, 2002, included Items 5 and 7. Under Item 5 we reported the receipt of proceeds from a private offering of stock warrants. Under Item 7, we filed a copy of our press release dated August 2, 2002, concerning the private placement. |
| • | The second report, dated August 8 and filed on August 15, 2002, included Item 4, under which we reported that we had changed auditors from Arthur Andersen LLP to KPMG LLP. |
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Palatin Technologies, Inc. (Registrant) | ||
| Date: | /s/ Carl Spana Carl Spana, Ph.D. President and Chief Executive Officer | |
| Date: | /s/ Stephen T. Wills Stephen T. Wills Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
18
I, Carl Spana, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Palatin Technologies, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 14, 2002
/s/ Carl Spana
Carl Spana, Chief Executive Officer
1619
I, Stephen T. Wills, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Palatin Technologies, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: November 14, 2002
/s/ Stephen T. Wills
Stephen T. Wills, Chief Executive Officer
20