UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarter ended September 30, 2000March 31, 2001
OR
¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
0–28252 BROADVISION, INC. (650) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes As of [ ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 19340-28252
(Commission File Number)
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)Delaware Delaware94–3184303(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) 94-3184303(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number) 585 Broadway, 585 Broadway,
Redwood City, California94063 (Address of principal executive offices) 94063
(Zip code)261-5100261–5100
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)[x]x No [ ]¨NovemberMay 9, 2000,2001, there were 269,141,816273,565,216 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock issued and outstanding.
BROADVISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q10–Q
Quarter Ended September 30, 2000March 31, 2001
TABLE OF CONTENTS
| SIGNATURES | ||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.Financial Statements
BROADVISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except per share data)
| September 30, 2000 | December 31, 1999 | ||||||||
| (unaudited) | March 31, 2001 (unaudited) | December 31, 2000 | |||||||
| ASSETS | |||||||||
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 156,401 | $ | 279,823 | $134,731 | $153,137 | |||
| Short-term investments | 110,526 | 68,758 | 41,597 | 69,397 | |||||
| Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,805 and $1,446, for 2000 and 1999, respectively | 92,579 | 26,540 | |||||||
| Accounts receivable, less reserves of $4,717 and $4,015, for 2001 and 2000, respectively | 86,474 | 104,811 | |||||||
| Prepaids and other | 13,139 | 5,085 | 17,721 | 17,417 | |||||
| Total current assets | 372,645 | 380,206 | 280,523 | 344,762 | |||||
| Property and equipment, net | 42,234 | 16,751 | 109,746 | 76,685 | |||||
| Deferred tax asset | 5,579 | 5,579 | |||||||
| Long-term investments | 81,291 | 4,414 | 72,571 | 78,769 | |||||
| Goodwill and other intangibles, net | 674,876 | — | |||||||
| Equity investments | 21,398 | 23,786 | |||||||
| Goodwill and other intangibles | 541,221 | 607,501 | |||||||
| Other assets | 6,624 | 4,757 | 6,123 | 5,942 | |||||
| Total assets | $ | 1,177,670 | $ | 406,128 | $1,037,161 | $1,143,024 | |||
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | |||||||||
| Accounts payable | $ | 12,824 | $ | 5,754 | $19,706 | $15,711 | |||
| Accrued expenses | 41,658 | 13,156 | 40,736 | 53,676 | |||||
| Unearned revenue | 16,897 | 3,896 | 20,868 | 16,330 | |||||
| Deferred maintenance | 37,179 | 15,228 | 38,178 | 42,237 | |||||
| Income taxes | — | 16,769 | |||||||
| Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations | 977 | 1,247 | |||||||
| Current portion of long-term debt | 977 | 977 | |||||||
| Total current liabilities | 109,535 | 56,050 | 120,465 | 128,931 | |||||
| Long-term debt, net of current portion | 3,653 | 3,897 | |||||||
| Other noncurrent liabilities | 884 | — | 885 | 898 | |||||
| Long-term debt, net of current portion | 4,113 | 4,890 | |||||||
| Total liabilities | 114,532 | 60,940 | 125,003 | 133,726 | |||||
| Commitments | |||||||||
| Stockholders’ equity: | |||||||||
| Convertible preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 10,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding | — | — | - | - | |||||
| Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; 267,977 and 244,812 shares issued and outstanding for 2000 and 1999, respectively | 27 | 24 | |||||||
| Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized; 272,965 and 270,066 shares issued and outstanding for 2001 and 2000, respectively | 27 | 27 | |||||||
| Additional paid-in capital | 1,161,642 | 320,259 | 1,183,393 | 1,176,042 | |||||
| Deferred compensation | — | (226 | ) | ||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | (144 | ) | 25,925 | ||||||
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax | (3,694) | (4,348) | |||||||
| Accumulated deficit | (98,387 | ) | (794 | ) | (267,568) | (162,423) | |||
| Total stockholders’ equity | 1,063,138 | 345,188 | 912,158 | 1,009,298 | |||||
| Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 1,177,670 | $ | 406,128 | $1,037,161 | $1,143,024 | |||
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
BROADVISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)LOSS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||
| 2000 | 1999 | 2000 | 1999 | Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||||
| 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
| (unaudited) | (unaudited) | ||||||||||||||
| Revenues: | |||||||||||||||
| Software licenses | $ | 72,351 | $ | 18,954 | $ | 169,913 | $ | 47,221 | $43,140 | $40,713 | |||||
| Services | 47,843 | 10,877 | 107,126 | 24,550 | 47,979 | 20,788 | |||||||||
| Total revenues | 120,194 | 29,831 | 277,039 | 71,771 | 91,119 | 61,501 | |||||||||
| Cost of revenues: | |||||||||||||||
| Cost of software licenses | 1,395 | 676 | 5,021 | 2,460 | 2,240 | 2,064 | |||||||||
| Cost of services | 34,015 | 7,241 | 79,971 | 15,186 | 37,368 | 15,673 | |||||||||
| Total cost of revenues | 35,410 | 7,917 | 84,992 | 17,646 | 39,608 | 17,737 | |||||||||
| Gross profit | 84,784 | 21,914 | 192,047 | 54,125 | 51,511 | 43,764 | |||||||||
| Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||
| Research and development | 14,988 | 3,816 | 30,453 | 9,986 | 26,971 | 5,759 | |||||||||
| Sales and marketing | 43,799 | 12,136 | 102,569 | 29,819 | 52,481 | 25,200 | |||||||||
| General and administrative | 8,198 | 2,119 | 18,542 | 5,001 | 10,590 | 3,611 | |||||||||
| Goodwill and intangible amortization | 66,308 | — | 121,712 | — | 66,280 | - | |||||||||
| Charge for acquired in-process technology | — | — | 10,100 | — | |||||||||||
| Total operating expenses | 133,293 | 18,071 | 283,376 | 44,806 | 156,322 | 34,570 | |||||||||
| Operating income (loss) | (48,509 | ) | 3,843 | (91,329 | ) | 9,319 | |||||||||
| Operating (loss) income | (104,811) | 9,194 | |||||||||||||
| Other income, net | 4,318 | 891 | 15,505 | 2,001 | 497 | 7,248 | |||||||||
| Income (loss) before provision for income taxes | (44,191 | ) | 4,734 | (75,824 | ) | 11,320 | |||||||||
| (Loss) income before provision for income taxes | (104,314) | 16,442 | |||||||||||||
| Provision for income taxes | 8,565 | 240 | 21,769 | 573 | 831 | 6,406 | |||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (52,756 | ) | $ | 4,494 | $ | (97,593 | ) | $ | 10,747 | |||||
| Basic earnings (loss) per share | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | 0.05 | |||||
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | 0.04 | |||||
| Net (loss) income | $(105,145) | $10,036 | |||||||||||||
| Basic (loss) earnings per share | $(0.39) | $0.04 | |||||||||||||
| Diluted (loss) earnings per share | $(0.39) | $0.04 | |||||||||||||
| Shares used in computing: | |||||||||||||||
| Basic earnings (loss) per share | 266,368 | 229,005 | 257,254 | 225,918 | |||||||||||
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share | 266,368 | 259,947 | 257,254 | 254,259 | |||||||||||
| Comprehensive income (loss): | |||||||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (52,756 | ) | $ | 4,494 | $ | (97,593 | ) | $ | 10,747 | |||||
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | |||||||||||||||
| Unrealized investment gains (losses) | (5,160 | ) | (2,102 | ) | (26,070 | ) | 7,943 | ||||||||
| Total comprehensive income (loss) | $ | (57,916 | ) | $ | 2,392 | $ | (123,663 | ) | $ | 18,690 | |||||
| Basic (loss) earnings per share | 271,011 | 245,495 | |||||||||||||
| Diluted (loss) earnings per share | 271,011 | 284,688 | |||||||||||||
| Comprehensive (loss) income: | |||||||||||||||
| Net (loss) income | $(105,145) | $10,036 | |||||||||||||
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | |||||||||||||||
| Unrealized long-term investment gains | 654 | 1,188 | |||||||||||||
| Total comprehensive (loss) income | $(104,491) | $11,224 | |||||||||||||
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
BROADVISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
| Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
| 2000 | 1999 | ||||||
| (unaudited) | |||||||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (97,593 | ) | $ | 10,747 | ||
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | |||||||
| Depreciation and amortization | 7,347 | 2,994 | |||||
| Amortization of deferred compensation | 226 | 248 | |||||
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | 1,359 | 433 | |||||
| Amortization of prepaid royalties | 996 | 250 | |||||
| Amortization of prepaid compensation | 1,456 | — | |||||
| Charge for acquired in-process technology | 10,100 | — | |||||
| Goodwill and intangible amortization | 121,712 | — | |||||
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquired business: | |||||||
| Accounts receivable | (56,470 | ) | (8,163 | ) | |||
| Prepaids and other | (7,510 | ) | (429 | ) | |||
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 21,675 | (7,743 | ) | ||||
| Unearned revenue and deferred maintenance | 23,620 | 7,241 | |||||
| Income tax benefit from stock option exercises | 21,079 | 13,330 | |||||
| Other noncurrent assets | (2,891 | ) | — | ||||
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 45,106 | 18,908 | |||||
| Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||
| Purchase of property and equipment | (29,934 | ) | (7,790 | ) | |||
| Purchase of long-term investments | (76,033 | ) | (750 | ) | |||
| Direct costs of purchase transaction, net of cash acquired | (6,039 | ) | — | ||||
| Other assets | — | (2,618 | ) | ||||
| Purchase of short-term investments | (175,947 | ) | (24,201 | ) | |||
| Maturity of short-term investments | 92,956 | — | |||||
| Net cash used for investing activities | (194,997 | ) | (35,359 | ) | |||
| Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net | 27,757 | 7,993 | |||||
| Proceeds from borrowings, net | — | 2,535 | |||||
| Repayments of borrowings | (1,018 | ) | — | ||||
| Payments on capital lease obligations | (270 | ) | (632 | ) | |||
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 26,469 | 9,896 | |||||
| Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents | (123,422 | ) | (6,555 | ) | |||
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 279,823 | 61,878 | |||||
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $ | 156,401 | $ | 55,323 | |||
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | |||||||
| Cash paid for interest | $ | 422 | $ | 267 | |||
| Cash paid for income taxes | $ | 1,165 | $ | 511 | |||
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||
| 2001 | 2000 | |
| (unaudited) | ||
| Cash flows from operating activities: | ||
| Net (loss) income | $(105,145) | $10,036 |
| Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities: | ||
| Depreciation and amortization | 5,791 | 1,943 |
| Amortization of deferred compensation | - | 79 |
| Accounts receivable reserves | 702 | 300 |
| Amortization of prepaid royalties | 1,136 | 296 |
| Amortization of prepaid compensation | 192 | 511 |
| Realized loss on cost method long-term investments | 1,281 | - |
| Equity in net loss from unconsolidated subsidiary | 1,107 | - |
| Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles | 66,280 | - |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||
| Accounts receivable | 17,635 | (11,766) |
| Prepaids and other | (1,267) | (4,728) |
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | (9,364) | 5,400 |
| Unearned revenue and deferred maintenance | 479 | 22,348 |
| Income taxes | - | 6,036 |
| Other noncurrent assets | (546) | (1,406) |
| Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities | (21,719) | 29,049 |
| Cash flows from investing activities: | ||
| Purchase of property and equipment | (38,852) | (7,174) |
| Purchase of long-term investments | (24,029) | (8,794) |
| Sales/maturity of long-term investments | 30,820 | - |
| Purchase of short-term investments | (17,666) | (16,915) |
| Sales/maturity of short-term investments | 45,946 | 1,072 |
| Net cash used for investing activities | (3,781) | (31,811) |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | ||
| Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net | 7,351 | 7,247 |
| Repayments of borrowings | (257) | (275) |
| Payments on capital lease obligations | - | (125) |
| Net cash provided by financing activities | 7,094 | 6,847 |
| Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (18,406) | 4,085 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | 153,137 | 279,823 |
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period | $134,731 | $283,908 |
| Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | ||
| Cash paid for interest | $118 | $125 |
| Cash paid for income taxes | $831 | $314 |
See Accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
BROADVISION, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1.Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Business—Business
BroadVision, Inc. (collectively with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, “BroadVision” or the “Company” "Company") was incorporated in the state of Delaware on May 13, 1993. BroadVisionThe Company develops and deliverssells an integrated suite of packaged applications for conducting e-commercee-business interactions, transactions and transactions. Companiesservices. Global enterprises and government entities use these applications to sell, buy and exchange goods, services and information over the webWeb and on wireless devices. The Company believes its e-commerceBroadVision e-business application suite enables a businessan entity to become more competitiveestablish and profitable by establishing and sustainingsustain high-yield relationships with customers, suppliers, partners, distributors, employees and employees through integration, automation and personalization ofother constituents in the e-commerce value chain.extended enterprise. BroadVision service professionalsservices, supported by over 200 partner organizations worldwide, transform these applications into business value for itsBroadVision's customers through consulting, education and support services.services in more than 34 countries.
The BroadVision producte-business application suite allows businesses to tailor their websiteWeb and wireless content to the special needs and interests of individual users by personalizing each constituent’s visitcontent and transactions on a real-time interactive basis. The Company offers enterprise-class solutions to connect companies to their customers, suppliers, partners and employees. These solutions enable companies to maintain and expand existing relationships in an online environment via a single, integrated e-business platform.
BroadVision Global Services, or BVGS, provides a broad range of consulting, training and technical support services to all of the Company’s applications accomplish this by capturing website visitor profile informationcustomers and targeting an enterprise’s contentimplementation partners. This organization provides business application and technical expertise, along with extensive product knowledge, to each visitor based on easily constructedcomplement the Company’s products and provide solutions that meet customers' unique business rules. The Company believesrequirements. By using these services, customers are able to build customized application solutions to maximize the benefits of these applications include greater customer satisfactionone-to-one relationship management and loyalty, increased business volume, enhanced brand awareness, reduced costs to service customers and execute transactions, as well as higher employee productivity. The Company’s XML-based content management tools can, when combined with BroadVision’s other product offerings, create a comprehensive, end-to-end offering for companies needing to manage content-rich and transactional e-businesses for delivery over the web and wireless devices.self-service.
The Company sells its products and services worldwide through a direct sales force and a channelA significant element of independent distributors, value-added resellers (“VARs”) and application service providers (“ASPs”). In addition, the Company’s sales are promoted through independent professional consulting organizations known as systems integrators or consulting partners and through members of a global network of strategic business relationships with key industry platform and web developer partners. The Company also engagesstrategy is to engage in strategic business alliances to assist with thein marketing, selling and developmentdeveloping customer applications.
As of its customers applications.March 31, 2001, the Company had developed key strategic business alliances with over 200 systems integration, design, consulting and other services organizations throughout the world, including Accenture, Deloitte Consulting, Hewlett-Packard Consulting, IBM Global Services, KPMG Consulting, Leapnet, PricewaterhouseCoopers and Roundarch. The Company’s platform alliances are partnerships formed to integrate technologies to drive business growth. Additionally, the Company places a strategic emphasis onhas developed key technology alliancespartnerships with leading Web- and wireless-focused companies in areas complementary to ensure that itsthe Company’s solutions, such as data analysis and reporting, enterprise application integration, enterprise Web management, call center management, content management, voice recognition, payment processing, auctioning and XML. These technology partnerships enhance the Company’s ability to base products are based on industry standards and to position it to take advantage of current and emerging technologies. AllThese alliances now include companies such as BEA Systems, Broadbase, Documentum, E.Piphany, Genesys, i2, Interwoven, Nuance, Tibco, WebMethods and Yantra.
The Company markets its products primarily through a direct sales organization with operations in North America, South America, Europe, Australia and Asia/Pacific. A component of these independent entities are often referredthe Company’s strategy is continued expansion of international activities. The Company intends to broaden its presence in international markets by expanding its international sales force and by entering into additional distribution agreements. The Company also contracts with third-party resellers, distributors and systems integrators in North America, South America, Europe, Australia and Asia /Pacific. The Company intends to increase the use of this distribution channel.
There has been a general downturn in the economy over the last several months. This downturn may continue in the future and could have an impact on our future financial results. Comparisons of financial performance made in this document as “partners.” The benefitsare not necessarily indicative of this approach include enablingfuture performance. Based upon the current economic environment, the Company had adjusted its estimates of expected fiscal 2001 revenue. The Company also reported a corporate-wide reorganization and reduction in force and will incur a charge in the second quarter of 2001, estimated to focus on its core competencies while reducing timebe in the $30.0 million to market and simplifying the task of designing and developing applications for itself and its customers.$50.0 million range.
Basis of Presentation—Presentation and Use of Estimates
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company. They have been prepared in accordance with the established guidelines for interim financial information as provided by the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The financial results and related information as of September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 and for the three and nine months ended September 30,March, 2001 and 2000 and 1999 are unaudited. The balance sheet at December 31, 19992000 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements as of that date but does not necessarily reflect all of the informational disclosures previously reported in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. In the Company’s opinion, the consolidated financial statements presented herein include all necessary adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, to fairly state the Company’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows for the periods indicated. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make certain assumptions and estimates that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from estimates.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included with the Company’s Form 10-K and other documents that have been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The results of the Company’s operations for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the full fiscal year or any future interim periods.
Reclassifications—Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.
Stock Splits—Revenue Recognition—On September 29, 1999,The Company's revenues are derived from software licensing arrangements and fees charged for services. Software is generally licensed for development use and for its use in deployment of the Company’s Boardcustomer's website. Deployment licenses are generally based on the number of Directors declaredpersons who register on a three-for-one common stock splitcustomer's website using the Company's software. The Company's revenue recognition policies are in accordance with Statement of Position ("SOP") 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended and SOP 98-9, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions. In general, software license revenues are recognized when a non-cancelable license agreement has been signed and the formcustomer acknowledges an unconditional obligation to pay, the software product has been delivered, there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance, the fees are fixed and determinable and collection is considered probable; professional services revenues are recognized as such services are performed; and maintenance revenues, or post-contract customer support, or PCS, including revenues bundled with software agreements which entitle the customers to technical support and future unspecified enhancements to our products, are deferred and recognized ratably over the related contract period, generally twelve months. Revenues recognized from multiple-element software arrangements are allocated to each element of the arrangement based on the fair values of the elements, such as software products, post contract customer support, installation or training. The determination of fair value is based on objective evidence which is specific to the Company. If evidence of fair value does not exist for all elements of a stock dividendlicense agreement and PCS is the only undelivered element, then all revenue for stockholdersthe license arrangement is recognized ratably over the term of recordthe agreement as license revenue. If evidence of October 11, 1999. The stock dividend payment date was October 25, 1999fair value of all undelivered elements exists but evidence does not exist for one or more delivered elements, then revenue is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the Company’s common stock traded ex-dividend starting October 26, 1999, reflectingremaining portion of the three-for-one stock split. On February 8, 2000,arrangement fee is recognized as revenue. Services that the Company’s BoardCompany provides are not essential to the functionality of Directors declared athe software.
three-for-one common stock split in The Company records unearned revenue for software arrangements when cash has been received from the form of a stock dividend for stockholders of record as of February 21, 2000. The stock dividend payment date was March 13, 2000customer and the Company’s common stock traded ex-dividend starting March 14, 2000, reflectingarrangement does not qualify for revenue recognition under the three-for-one stock split.Company's revenue recognition policy. The accompanying consolidated financial statementsCompany records accounts receivable for software arrangements when the arrangement qualifies for revenue recognition but cash or other consideration has not been received from the customer.
The Company's professional services are delivered through BVGS, presently comprised of the Strategic Services Group, the Technical Services Group, the Content and related financial information contained herein have been retroactively restatedCreative Services Group, the Client Services, Project and Program Management Group, the Partner Services Group, the Education Services Group and the Technical Support Services Group. The first three groups provide consulting services, the fourth group manages projects and client relationships, the fifth group manages the needs of our partner community, the sixth group provides training-related services to give effect foremployees, customers and partners, and the stock splits.last group provides software maintenance services, including technical support, to the Company's customers and partners. Revenue from consulting services is typically recognized as services are performed. Maintenance fees relating to technical support and upgrades are recognized ratably over the maintenance period.
Net Earnings (Loss) Per ShareShare——Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 128, Earnings Per Share, requires the presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Earnings per share are calculated by dividing net income applicable to common stockholders by a weighted average number of shares outstanding for the period. Basic earnings per share are determined solely on common shares whereas diluted earnings per share include common equivalent shares, as determined under the treasury stock method.
The following table sets forth basic and diluted earnings per share computational data for the periods presented (in thousands, except per share amounts):
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||
| 2000 | 1999 | 2000 | 1999 | ||||||||||
| Net income (loss) | $ | (52,756 | ) | $ | 4,494 | $ | (97,593 | ) | $ | 10,747 | |||
| Weighted average common shares outstanding utilized for basic earnings (loss) per share | 266,368 | 229,005 | 257,254 | 225,918 | |||||||||
| Weighted average common equivalent shares outstanding: | |||||||||||||
| Employee common stock options | — | 30,726 | — | 28,086 | |||||||||
| Common stock warrants | — | 216 | — | 255 | |||||||||
| Total weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding utilized for diluted earnings (loss) per share | 266,368 | 259,947 | 257,254 | 254,259 | |||||||||
| Basic earnings (loss) per share | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | 0.05 | |||
| Diluted earnings (loss) per share | $ | (0.20 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | (0.38 | ) | $ | 0.04 | |||
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||
| 2001 | 2000 | |
| Net (loss) income | $(105,145) | $10,036 |
| Weighted-average common shares outstanding utilized for basic (loss) earnings per share | 271,011 | 245,495 |
| Weighted-average common equivalent shares outstanding: | ||
| Employee common stock options | - | 39,168 |
| Common stock warrants | - | 25 |
| Total weighted-average common and common equivalent shares outstanding utilized for diluted (loss) earnings per share | 271,011 | 284,688 |
| Basic (loss) earnings per share | $(0.39) | $0.04 |
| Diluted (loss) earnings per share | $(0.39) | $0.04 |
DilutedAt March 31, 2001, 17,711,682 potential common shares are excluded from the determination of diluted net loss per share does not includeas the effect of the followingsuch shares is anti-dilutive. At March 31, 2000, there were no potential common shares at September 30, 2000, asexcluded from the determination of diluted earnings per share.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments--The Company's financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, long-term investments, equity investments, accounts payable and debt. The Company does not have any derivative financial instruments. The Company believes the reported carrying amounts of its financial instruments approximates fair value, based upon the short maturity of cash equivalents, short term investments, accounts receivable and payable, and based on the current rates available to the Company on similar debt issues. Additionally, the Company periodically evaluates the carrying value of all of its investments for permanent impairment when events and circumstances indicate that the book value of an asset may not be recoverable. If such shares wouldassets are considered to be anti-dilutive (in thousands):impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amounts by which the carrying amount exceeds its fair market value. The Company's equity investments are comprised of investments in public and non-public technology-related companies. The Company may record future impairment charges due to continued economic decline and the potential resulting negative impact on these companies. During the three months ended March 31, 2001 the Company recorded $1.3 million in impairment charges on its cost method long-term investments. There was no such charge during the three months ended March 31, 2000.
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2000 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2000 | ||||||
| Employee common stock options | 32,665 | 36,603 | |||||
| Common stock warrants | 22 | 24 | |||||
New Accounting PronouncementsPronouncements——The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,, asamended by SFAS No. 137. SFAS No. 133 addresses the accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts. Under SFAS No. 133, entities are required to record and carry all derivative instruments at fair value as either assets or liabilities. The accounting for changes in fair value (i.e., gains or losses) of a derivative instrument depends on whether it qualifies as part of a hedging relationship, has been so designated as such and the underlying reason for holding it. The Company must adoptadopted SFAS No. 133, as amended, byon January 1, 2001 as required. To date, the Company has not invested in derivative instruments and doeshas not expect such adoption will have any material effect on its financial statements.
In December 1999,engaged in hedging activities. Accordingly, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletineffects of adopting SFAS No. 101 (“SAB 101”), Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements, which provides guidance on the recognition, presentation, and disclosure of revenue in financial statements filed with the SEC. SAB 101 outlines the basic criteria that must be met to recognize revenue and provides guidance for disclosure related to revenue recognition policies. The Company will adopt SAB 101 upon its effective date in the fourth quarter of 2000, as required and does not expect the adoption of SAB 101 to have any material effect on its financial position or results of operations.
In March 2000, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation”, an interpretation of Accounting Principles Board, (“APB”), Opinion No. 25. This interpretation provides guidance regarding the application of APB Opinion No. 25 to stock compensation involving employees. This interpretation was effective July 1, 2000 and133 did not have a material effectan impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In June 2000, the FASB issued Statement No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities. FASB No. 138 addresses certain issues related to the implementation of SFAS No. 133, but did not change the basic model of SFAS No. 133 or further delay the implementation of SFAS No. 133.
Note 2.Selective Balance Sheet Detail
Property and equipmentconsisted of the following (in thousands):
| September 30, | December 31, | ||||||
| 2000 | 1999 | ||||||
| Furniture and fixtures | $ | 4,805 | $ | 2,323 | |||
| Computers and software | 43,036 | 17,618 | |||||
| Leasehold improvements | 11,833 | 6,903 | |||||
| 59,674 | 26,844 | ||||||
| Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (17,440 | ) | (10,093 | ) | |||
| $ | 42,234 | $ | 16,751 | ||||
| March 31, 2001 | December 31, 2000 | |
| Furniture and fixtures | $9,493 | $6,136 |
| Computers and software | 66,080 | 56,654 |
| Leasehold improvements | 60,533 | 34,465 |
| 136,106 | 97,255 | |
| Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (26,360) | (20,570) |
| $109,746 | $76,685 |
Accrued expenses consisted of the following (in thousands):
| September 30, | December 31, | ||||||
| 2000 | 1999 | ||||||
| Employee benefits | $ | 11,136 | $ | 1,340 | |||
| Commissions and bonuses | 16,730 | 6,747 | |||||
| Sales and other taxes | 1,410 | 1,122 | |||||
| Other | 12,382 | 3,947 | |||||
| $ | 41,658 | $ | 13,156 | ||||
| March 31, 2001 | December 31, 2000 | |
| Employee benefits | $4,962 | $3,900 |
| Commissions and bonuses | 14,027 | 22,790 |
| Sales and other taxes | 8,618 | 11,439 |
| Other | 13,129 | 15,547 |
| $40,736 | $53,676 |
Note 3.Commercial Credit Facilities
The Company has various credit facilities with a commercial lender which include term debt in the form of notes payable and a revolving line of credit that provides for up to $10,000,000 of additional borrowings based on eligible accounts receivable. As of September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 and December 31, 1999,2000, outstanding term debt borrowings were approximately $5,100,000$4.6 million and $5,900,000,$4.9 million, respectively. Borrowings bear interest at the bank’s prime rate (9.5%(8.0% and 8.5%9.5% as of September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 and December 31, 1999,2000, respectively). Principal and interest are due in consecutive monthly payments through maturity based on the term of the facility. Principal payments of $977,000 are due annually from 2000 through 2004, $611,000 due in 2005, and a final payment of $357,000 due in 2006. As of September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 and December 31, 1999,2000, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its revolving line of credit. However, commitments totaling $3,809,000 and $2,820,000$2.4 million in the form of standby letters of credit were issued under its revolving line of credit facility as of September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 and December 31, 1999,2000, respectively. Commitments totaling $21,682,641$23.0 million in the form of standby letters of credit were also issued from a separate financial institutioninstitutions as of September 30, 2000.March 31, 2001. The commercial credit facilities include covenants which impose certain restrictions on the payment of dividends and other distributions and requires the Company to maintain monthly financial covenants, including a minimum quick ratio, tangible net worth ratio and debt service coverage ratio. Borrowings are collateralized by a security interest in substantially all of the Company’s owned assets. TheAs of March 31, 2001, the Company was not in compliance with one of its financial covenants due to its net operating loss for the three months then ended. In May 2001, the Company signed an amendment to the loan agreement and is now in compliance with its financial covenantscovenants.
Note 4. Commitments
The Company currently has $4.6 million of outstanding term debt under its existing credit facility with a commercial bank. Capital expenditures were $38.9 million and $7.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company's capital expenditures consisted of purchases of operating resources to manage its operations and consisted of computer hardware and software, communications equipments, office furniture and fixtures and leasehold improvements. In February and April 2000, the Company entered into new facility lease agreements for approximately 519,000 square feet currently under construction. The Company expects possession to occur in phases during the second and third quarters of 2001. Lease payments will be made on an escalating basis with the total future minimum lease payments amounting to $316.4 million. The Company will also have to contribute a significant amount towards construction costs of the facility. As of March 31, 2001, the Company had paid $44.5 million for improvements to the facility. The total estimated cost of improvements is approximately $56.7 million, but is subject to change. The Company has no other significant capital commitments. In connection with the restructuring of the Company's operations in the quarter ending June 30, 2001, the Company is currently assessing its facilities needs and may incur charges due to closure of facilities as a result of September 30, 2000.the restructuring. See Note 7 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Note 4.5. Geographic, Segment and Significant Customer Information
The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,, during 1998. SFAS No. 131 establishes standards for the reporting by public business enterprises of information about operating segments, products and services, geographic areas and major customers. The methodology for determining what information is reportedto report is based on the organization ofway that management organizes the operating segments andwithin the related information that the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) usesCompany for making operational decisions and assessments of financial performance assessments.performance. The Company’s chief operating decision maker is considered to be the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, (“CEO”) is considered its CODM.or CEO. The CEO reviews consolidated financial information presented on a consolidated basis accompanied by disaggregated information for products and
services andabout revenues by geographic region and by product for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance assessments.performance. The Company operates in one segment, electronic business commerce solutions.
The Company sells its products and provides services worldwide through a direct sales force and through a channel of independent distributors, value-added resellers (“VARs”) and application service providers (“ASPs”). In addition, the sales of the Company’s products are promoted through independent professional consulting organizations known as systems integrators. The Company provides services worldwide directly through its Worldwide ProfessionalBroadVision Global Services Organization and indirectly through distributors, VARs, ASPs and system integrators. ItThe Company currently operates in three primary geographical territories: NASA, which includes North and South America; EMEA, which includes Europe, the Middle East Africa and India;Africa; and Asia/Pacific/Japan (APJ), which includes the Pacific Rim, and the Far East.East and India. Disaggregated financial information regarding the Company’s products and services and geographic revenues is as follows (in thousands):
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2000 | 1999 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||||
| Software licenses: | ||||||||||||||||
| One-To-One Enterprise | $ | 7,941 | $ | 2,548 | $ | 21,676 | $ | 6,646 | ||||||||
| One-To-One WebApps | 53,083 | 13,739 | 118,467 | 34,633 | ||||||||||||
| Tools | 11,327 | 2,667 | 29,770 | 5,942 | ||||||||||||
| Services | 35,054 | 7,260 | 77,223 | 16,323 | ||||||||||||
| Maintenance | 12,789 | 3,617 | 29,903 | 8,227 | ||||||||||||
| Total Revenues | $ | 120,194 | $ | 29,831 | $ | 277,039 | $ | 71,771 | ||||||||
| Revenues: | ||||||||||||||||
| NASA | $ | 79,607 | $ | 20,266 | $ | 190,920 | $ | 50,012 | ||||||||
| EMEA | 30,921 | 7,807 | 64,190 | 15,444 | ||||||||||||
| APJ | 9,666 | 1,758 | 21,929 | 6,315 | ||||||||||||
| Total Company | $ | 120,194 | $ | 29,831 | $ | 277,039 | $ | 71,771 | ||||||||
| September 30, 2000 | December 31, 1999 | ||||||
| Identifiable assets: | |||||||
| NASA | $ | 1,140,327 | $ | 400,858 | |||
| EMEA | 32,027 | 4,122 | |||||
| APJ | 5,316 | 1,148 | |||||
| Total Company | $ | 1,177,670 | $ | 406,128 | |||
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||
| 2001 | 2000 | |
| Software licenses: | ||
| One-To-One Enterprise | $2,472 | $5,704 |
| One-To-One Packaged Solutions | 40,668 | 35,009 |
| Services | 31,499 | 13,678 |
| Maintenance | 16,480 | 7,110 |
| Total Revenues | $91,119 | $61,501 |
| Revenues: | ||
| NASA | $61,513 | $47,285 |
| EMEA | 22,571 | 11,623 |
| APJ | 7,035 | 2,593 |
| Total Company | $91,119 | $61,501 |
| March 31, 2001 | December 31, 2000 | |
| Identifiable assets: | ||
| NASA | $993,138 | $1,102,343 |
| EMEA | 35,590 | 33,254 |
| APJ | 8,433 | 7,427 |
| Total Company | $1,037,161 | $1,143,024 |
Prior periods have been restated to reflect changes in software license classifications. During the ninethree months ended September 30, 2000 andMarch 31, 2001, one customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company's total revenues. During the three months ended September 30, 1999,March 31, 2000, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s total revenues. During the three months ended September 30, 2000 and the nine months ended September 30, 1999, one reseller customer accounted for 11% of the Company’sCompany's total revenues.
Note 5.6. AcquisitionAcquisition
On April 14, 2000, the Company completed its acquisition of Interleaf, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“Interleaf”) pursuant to a statutory merger involving a stock-for-stock exchange. Interleaf’s software products and related services enable automated electronic business, or e-business, and also enable the extension of e-business to wireless users. Interleaf provides customers with an integrated, easily implemented e-business solution based on extensible Markup Language, or XML, that enables the design, creation and management of XML-based content for transformation and delivery over the Web and related services. As a result of the acquisition, the Company will have the ability to combine technological resources to develop a robust Web-based business solution and reduce time to market for the combined Company’s products. Through the acquisition of all of the equity securities of Interleaf, BroadVision acquired all of the assets and assumed liabilities of Interleaf and its existing operations which included in-process technology. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of January 26, 2000, (the “Merger Agreement”), each outstanding share of Interleaf common stock was exchanged for 1.0395 shares of Company common stock and all options to purchase shares of Interleaf common stock outstanding immediately prior to the consummation of the Mergermerger were converted into options to purchase shares of Company common stock.
The Company issued 14,391,991 shares of Company common stock with a fair market value of $686.9 million and exchanged options to purchase 2,338,342 shares of Company common stock with a fair market value of $102.7 million. The fair market value of the exchanged options to purchase 2,338,342 shares of Company common stock was valued using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. In connection with the acquisition, the Company incurred transaction costs consisting primarily of financial advisor, legal and accounting professional fees of $14.8 million, severance costs of $1.0 million and office closure costs of $1.3 million, resulting in a total purchase price of $806.7 million. The results of operations of Interleaf have been included with the Company’s results of operations since the April 14, 2000 acquisition date.
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination. Under this accounting treatment, the purchase price is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on the estimated fair values on the date of acquisition.
The total purchase price paid for the Interleaf acquisition was allocated as follows (in thousands):
| Property and equipment | $ | 2,896 | ||
| Net assets acquired, excluding property and equipment | (2,284 | ) | ||
| Identifiable intangible assets | 28,910 | |||
| In-process technology | 10,100 | |||
| Goodwill | 767,048 | |||
| Total | $ | 806,670 | ||
| Property and equipment | $2,896 |
| Net liabilities assumed, excluding property and equipment | (1,041) |
| Identifiable intangible assets | 28,910 |
| In-process technology | 10,100 |
| Goodwill | 765,805 |
| Total | $806,670 |
Based upon the Company’s estimates prepared in conjunction with a third-party valuation consultant, $10.1 million was allocated to acquired in-process technology and $796.0$28.9 million was allocated to intangible assets. The amounts allocated to intangible assets include completed technologies of $20.4 million and assembled workforces of $8.5 million.
At September 30, 2000,March 31, 2001, accumulated amortization related to the goodwill and other intangible assets acquired in the Interleaf acquisition totaled $121.6$253.9 million. Goodwill amortization was $117.2$244.6 million and other intangible asset amortization was $4.4$9.3 million. The goodwill and other intangible assets are being amortized over a three-year period.
The following summary, prepared on an unaudited pro forma basis, reflects the condensed consolidated results of operations for the nine-monththree month period ended September 30,March 31, 2000 and 1999 assuming Interleaf had been acquired at the beginning of the periodsperiod presented (in thousands, except per share data):
| For the nine months ended September 30, | |||||||
| 2000 | 1999 | ||||||
| Revenue | $ | 290,702 | $ | 110,909 | |||
| Net loss | (172,584 | ) | (191,944 | ) | |||
| Basic and diluted net loss per share | $ | (0.65 | ) | $ | (0.81 | ) | |
| For the three months ended March 31, 2000 | |
| Revenue | $73,857 |
| Net loss | (61,636) |
| Basic and diluted net loss per share | $(0.24) |
The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what would have occurred if the acquisition had been in effect for the periodsperiod presented. In addition, they are not intended to be a projection of future results and do not reflect any synergies that might be affected from combined operations. The charges for in-process technology have not been included in the unaudited pro forma results because they are nonrecurring. See Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for more information concerning the acquisition of Interleaf.
10Note 7. Subsequent Events
On April 20, 2001, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission reporting that several purported class action lawsuits had been filed against the Company and certain of its officers and directors. In each of the lawsuits, the plaintiffs seek to assert claims on behalf of a class of all persons who purchased securities of the Company between January 26, 2001 and April 2, 2001. The complaints allege that the Company and the individual defendants violated federal securities laws in connection with the Company’s reporting of financial results during such period. The Company expects that all of the lawsuits will eventually be consolidated into a single action, as is customary in such cases. The Company believes that the lawsuits are without merit and it will defend itself vigorously.
On April 24, 2001, the Company announced a restructuring of its operations, aggressive containment of discretionary spending and a workforce reduction of approximately 15%. As part of this reorganization, the Company will incur a charge in the second quarter of 2001 estimated to be between $30.0 million and $50.0 million.
On April 25, 2001, the Company announced a voluntary stock option exchange program, or Offer, for its employees and directors. Under the program, Company employees and directors have the opportunity, if they so choose, to cancel outstanding “underwater” stock options, which are options that have an exercise price that is higher than the price of the Company's Common Stock on the date that the Offer expires, previously granted to them in exchange for an equal number of new options to be granted at a future date. The Offer will remain outstanding until 5:00 p.m., Pacific Daylight Time, on May 25, 2001, or such later date if the offer is extended (the “Expiration Date”). The exercise price of these new options will be equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, which is expected to be November 27, 2001 or a later date if the Offer is extended. Acceptance of the Offer requires a participant electing to exchange any underwater options to also exchange any other options granted to him or her during the six months before or after the Expiration Date. The exchange program has been designed to comply with FASB Interpretation No. 44 “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation” and is not expected to result in any additional compensation charges or variable plan accounting. Employees located in Sweden and options granted on November 2, 1999 under the Company's Employee Stock Purchase Plan in connection with the listing and sale of the Company's common stock on the Neuer Market segment of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange are not eligible for this program.
On April 30, 2001 and May 15, 2001, the Company entered into agreements with third parties to sell certain assets and liabilities of E-Publication Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and the subsidiaries of E-Publication Corporation, which the Company acquired as part of the acquisition of Interleaf in April 2000, (see Note 6 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). The Company expects to incur losses on the sales in the range of $1.0 million to $3.0 million. The Company is currently evaluating the amount of goodwill associated with E-Publication Corporation, and these and other related charges will be included in the losses associated with the sale of the business. The losses will be reflected in the results of operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Except for the historical information contained herein, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results could differ significantly from those discussed herein. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed herein and in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K and other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date such statements are made.
Overview
BroadVision, developsInc. (collectively with its subsidiaries, the "Company", "us" or "we") was incorporated in the state of Delaware on May 13, 1993. We develop and deliverssell an integrated suite of packaged applications for conducting e-commercee-business interactions, transactions and transactions. Companiesservices. Global enterprises and government entities use these applications to sell, buy and exchange goods, services and information over the webWeb and on wireless devices. The Company believes its e-commerceBroadVision e-business application suite enables a businessan entity to become more competitiveestablish and profitable by establishing and sustainingsustain high-yield relationships with customers, suppliers, partners, distributors, employees and employees through integration, automation and personalization ofother constituents in the e-commerce value chain.extended enterprise. BroadVision service professionalsservices, supported by over 200 partner organizations worldwide, transform these applications into business value for itsBroadVision's customers through consulting, education and support services.services in more than 34 countries.
The BroadVision producte-business application suite allows businesses to tailor their websiteWeb and wireless content to the special needs and interests of individual users by personalizing each constituent’s visitcontent and transactions on a real-time interactive basis. The Company’s applications accomplish this by capturing website visitor profile informationWe offer enterprise-class solutions to connect companies to their customers, suppliers, partners and targetingemployees. These solutions enable companies to maintain and expand existing relationships in an enterprise’s contentonline environment via a single, integrated e-business platform.
BroadVision Global Services, or BVGS, provides a broad range of consulting, training and technical support services to each visitor based on easily constructedall of our customers and implementation partners. This organization provides business rules. The Company believesapplication and technical expertise, along with extensive product knowledge, to complement our products and provide solutions that meet customers' unique business requirements. By using these services, customers are able to build customized application solutions to maximize the benefits of these applications include greater customer satisfactionone-to-one relationship management and loyalty, increased business volume, enhanced brand awareness, reduced costsself-service.
A significant element of our sales strategy is to service customers and execute transactions, as well as higher employee productivity. The Company’s XML-based content management tools can, when combined with BroadVision’s other product offerings, create a comprehensive, end-to-end offering for companies needing to manage content-rich and transactional e-businesses for delivery over the web and wireless devices.
The Company sells its products and services worldwide through a direct sales force and a channel of independent distributors, value-added resellers (“VARs”) and application service providers (“ASPs”). In addition, the Company’s sales are promoted through independent professional consulting organizations known as systems integrators or consulting partners and through members of a global network of strategic business relationships with key industry platform and web developer partners. The Company also engagesengage in strategic business alliances to assist with thein marketing, selling and developmentdeveloping customer applications.
As of its customers applications. The Company places aMarch 31, 2001, we had developed key strategic emphasis onbusiness alliances with over 200 systems integration, design, consulting and other services organizations throughout the world, including Accenture, Deloitte Consulting, Hewlett-Packard Consulting, IBM Global Services, KPMG Consulting, Leapnet, PricewaterhouseCoopers and Roundarch. Our platform alliances are partnerships formed to integrate technologies to drive business growth. Additionally, we have developed key technology alliancespartnerships with leading Web- and wireless-focused companies in areas complementary to ensure that itsour solutions, such as data analysis and reporting, enterprise application integration, enterprise Web management, call center management, content management, voice recognition, payment processing, auctioning and XML. These technology partnerships enhance our ability to base products are based on industry standards and to position it to take advantage of current and emerging technologies. AllThese alliances now include companies such as BEA Systems, Broadbase, Documentum, E.Piphany, Genesys, i2, Interwoven, Nuance, Tibco, WebMethods and Yantra.
We market our products primarily through a direct sales organization with operations in North America, South America, Europe, Australia and Asia/Pacific. A component of these independent entities are often referredour strategy is continued expansion of international activities. We intend to broaden our presence in international markets by expanding our international sales force and by entering into additional distribution agreements. We also contract with third-party resellers, distributors and systems integrators in North America, South America, Europe, Australia and Asia /Pacific. We intend to increase the use of this distribution channel.
There has been a general downturn in the economy over the last several months. This downturn may continue in the future and could have an impact on our future financial results. Comparisons of financial performance made in this document as “partners.” The benefitsare not necessarily indicative of this approach include enablingfuture performance. Based upon the Companycurrent economic environment, we had adjusted our estimates of expected fiscal 2001 revenues. We also announced a corporate-wide reorganization and reduction in force and will incur a charge in the second quarter of 2001, estimated to focus on its core competencies while reducing timebe in the $30.0 million to market and simplifying the task of designing and developing applications for itself and its customers.$50.0 million range.
Results of Operations
Revenues
Revenues
The Company’s Our revenues are derived from software license feeslicensing arrangements and fees charged for its services. Software is generally licensed for development use and for its use in deployment of the customer’s website .customer's website. Deployment licenses are generally based on the number of persons who register on a customer’scustomer's website using the Company’sour software. The Company recognizesOur revenue recognition policies are in accordance with Statement of Position ("SOP") 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended and SOP 98-9, Software Revenue Recognition, With Respect to Certain Transactions. In general, software license revenues are recognized when a non-cancelable license agreement has been signed and the customer acknowledges an unconditional obligation to pay, the software product has been delivered, there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance, the fees are fixed and determinable and collection is considered probable.probable; professional services revenues are recognized as such services are performed; and maintenance revenues, or post-contract customer support, or PCS, including revenues bundled with software agreements which entitle the customers to technical support and future unspecified enhancements to our products, are deferred and recognized ratably over the related contract period, generally twelve months. Revenues recognized from multiple-element software arrangements are allocated to each element of the arrangement based on the fair values of the elements, such as software products, post contract customer support, installation or training. The determination of fair value is based on objective evidence which is specific to us. If evidence of fair value does not exist for all elements of a license agreement and PCS is the only undelivered element, then all revenue for the license arrangement is recognized ratably over the term of the agreement as license revenue. If evidence of fair value of all undelivered elements exists but evidence does not exist for one or more delivered elements, then revenue is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is recognized as revenue. Services that we provide are not essential to the functionality of the software.
The Company’sWe record unearned revenue for software arrangements when cash has been received from the customer and the arrangement does not qualify for revenue recognition under our revenue recognition policy. We record accounts receivable for software arrangements when the arrangement qualifies for revenue recognition but cash or other consideration has not been received from the customer.
Our professional services are provideddelivered through its Worldwide Professional Services Organization (“WPSO”) operation,BVGS, presently comprised of the Strategic Services Group, the Technical Services Group, the Content and StrategicCreative Services Group, the e-publicationsClient Services, Project and Program Management Group, BroadVision Universitythe Partner Services Group, the Education Services Group and the Worldwide CustomerTechnical Support Services Group. The first three groups provide consulting services, the fourth group manages projects and client relationships, the fifth group manages the needs of our partner community, the sixth group provides training-related services to employees, customers and partners, and the last group provides software maintenance services, (includingincluding technical support)support, to
the Company’s our customers and partners. Revenue from consulting services areis typically recognized as services are performed. Maintenance fees relating to technical support and upgrades are recognized ratably over the maintenance period.
Total Company revenues increased 303%48% during the quarter ended September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 to $120.2$91.1 million as compared to $29.8$61.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 1999. For the nine months ended September 30, 2000, total Company revenues increased 286% to $277.0 million as compared to $71.8 million for the comparable period during 1999.March 31, 2000. A summary of the Company’sour revenues by geographic region is as follows:
| Software | % | Services | % | Total | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Software | % | Services | % | Total | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | (dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Three Months Ended: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| September 30, 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| March 31, 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NASA | $ | 42,005 | 58 | % | $ | 37,602 | 78 | % | $ | 79,607 | 66 | % | $28,186 | 65% | $33,327 | 69% | $61,513 | 67% | |||||||
| EMEA | 22,840 | 32 | 8,081 | 17 | 30,921 | 26 | 11,606 | 27 | 10,965 | 23 | 22,571 | 25 | |||||||||||||
| APJ | 7,506 | 10 | 2,160 | 5 | 9,666 | 8 | 3,348 | 8 | 3,687 | 8 | 7,035 | 8 | |||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 72,351 | 100 | % | $ | 47,843 | 100 | % | $ | 120,194 | 100 | % | $43,140 | 100% | $47,979 | 100% | $91,119 | 100% | |||||||
| September 30, 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| March 31, 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NASA | $ | 11,610 | 61 | % | $ | 8,656 | 80 | % | $ | 20,266 | 68 | % | $31,760 | 78% | $15,525 | 75% | $47,285 | 77% | |||||||
| EMEA | 6,063 | 32 | 1,744 | 16 | 7,807 | 26 | 7,259 | 18 | 4,364 | 21 | 11,623 | 19 | |||||||||||||
| APJ | 1,281 | 7 | 477 | 4 | 1,758 | 6 | 1,694 | 4 | 899 | 4 | 2,593 | 4 | |||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 18,954 | 100 | % | $ | 10,877 | 100 | % | $ | 29,831 | 100 | % | $40,713 | 100% | $20,788 | 100% | $61,501 | 100% | |||||||
| Nine Months Ended: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| September 30, 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NASA | $ | 108,134 | 64 | % | $ | 82,786 | 77 | % | $ | 190,920 | 69 | % | |||||||||||||
| EMEA | 44,918 | 26 | 19,272 | 18 | 64,190 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||
| APJ | 16,861 | 10 | 5,068 | 5 | 21,929 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 169,913 | 100 | % | $ | 107,126 | 100 | % | $ | 277,039 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
| September 30, 1999 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| NASA | $ | 31,229 | 66 | % | $ | 18,783 | 77 | % | $ | 50,012 | 70 | % | |||||||||||||
| EMEA | 10,893 | 23 | 4,551 | 18 | 15,444 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||
| APJ | 5,099 | 11 | 1,216 | 5 | 6,315 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Total | $ | 47,221 | 100 | % | $ | 24,550 | 100 | % | $ | 71,771 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||
There has been a general economic decline during the past several months that may continue. Therefore, financial comparisons discussed herein may not be indicative of future performance.
Software product license revenues increased 281%6% during the current quarter ended September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 to $72.4$43.1 million as compared to $19.0$40.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 1999. ForMarch 31, 2000. The increase is primarily attributable to continued market acceptance of and demand for our products, an increase in our customer base, expansion of our business in EMEA and APJ, expansion of our product offerings, additional sales for products acquired in the nine months ended September 30, 2000,Interleaf acquisition, and the establishment of strategic relationships.
Software license revenues increased 260%for our Enterprise applications decreased to $169.9$2.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2001 as compared to $47.2$5.7 million for the comparable period during 1999.
The increase in software license revenuesquarter ended March 31, 2000. This is a result of a greater number of customers who are utilizing our packaged solutions, which include our Enterprise applications along with web applications and various tools, as opposed to utilizing only our Enterprise application. Software license revenues for our packaged solutions increased to $40.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2001 as compared to $35.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2000. This is a result of continued strong demand by existing and new customers for the Company’s expandingour product line and core competencies and the growing marketa one-time fee from a significant customer that accounted for business-to-business and business-to-consumer e-commerce software application solutions. Software license revenue also increased during the nine months ended September 30, 2000 as a resultgreater than 10% of sales of software licenses of products acquired in the Interleaf transaction.In addition, software licenseour total revenues for the Company’s Enterprise applications increased to $7.9 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 as compared to $2.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 1999. Software product license revenues for Enterprise applications increased to $21.7 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2000 as compared to $6.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 1999. Software license revenues for the Company’s web applications (“WebApps”) increased to $53.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 as compared to $13.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 1999. Software license revenues for the Company’s WebApps increased to $118.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2000 as compared to $34.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2000.March 31, 2001.
The Company believes that customers’ requirements to successfully accommodate more registered visitors to their websites after they have “ gone live,” been deployed, has resulted in a continued increase in deployment license revenues. During the quarter ended September 30, 2000, the CompanyMarch 31, 2001, we signed license agreements with 14246 new customers (115(37 end-user customers and 279 partner organizations) as compared to 72110 new customers (56(102 end users and 168 partner organizations) for the quarter ended September 30, 1999. The Company signed license agreements with 413 new customers (353 end-user organizations and 60 partner organizations) for the nine months ended September 30, 2000 as compared to 180 new licensed customers (140 end-users and 40 partner organizations) for the nine months ended September 30, 1999.March 31, 2000. As of September 30, 2000, the CompanyMarch 31, 2001, we had a total installed base of 8791,009 end-user customers and 183206 partners as compared to 415972 end-user customers and 123197 partners as of December 31, 19992000 and 335517 end-user customers and 115131 partners as of September 30, 1999.March 31, 2000.
Total services revenuesservices revenues increased 339%131% during the current quarter ended September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 to $47.8$48.0 million as compared to $10.9$20.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 1999. For the nine months ended September 30, 2000, services revenues increased 335% to $107.1 million as compared to $24.6 million for the comparable period during 1999.March 31, 2000.
The increase in professional services revenue is a result of higher levels of consulting related services associated with increased business volumes and higher customer support revenues derived from a larger installed customer base. Maintenance related fees for technical support and product upgrades were $12.8$16.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 as compared to $3.6$7.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 1999. Maintenance related fees were $29.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2000 as compared to $8.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 1999.March 31, 2000. The Company also experienced increasesincrease in services and maintenance revenues asis a result of the Interleaf acquisition. During fiscal 2000, the Company expanded its corporate training facilities by building new training centers in Chicago, Illinois, the United Kingdomincreased license revenues as noted above and Taipei, Taiwan.renewals of recurring maintenance.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of license revenues include the costs of product media, duplication, packaging and other manufacturing costs as well as royalties payable to third parties for software that is either embedded in, or bundled and sold with, the Company’sour products.
Cost of services consists primarily of employee-related costs, third-party consultant fees incurred on consulting projects, post-contract customer support and instructional training services.
A summary of the cost of revenues for the periods presented is as follows:
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2000 | % | 1999 | % | 2000 | % | 1999 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cost of software licenses (1) | $ | 1,395 | 2 | % | $ | 676 | 4 | % | $ | 5,021 | 3 | % | $ | 2,460 | 5 | % | |||||||||
| Cost of services (2) | 34,015 | 71 | 7,241 | 67 | 79,971 | 75 | 15,186 | 62 | |||||||||||||||||
| Total cost of revenues (3) | $ | 35,410 | 29 | % | $ | 7,917 | 27 | % | $ | 84,992 | 31 | % | $ | 17,646 | 25 | % | |||||||||
______________
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||
| 2001 | % | 2000 | % | |
| (in thousands) | ||||
| Cost of software licenses (1) | $2,240 | 5% | $2,064 | 5% |
| Cost of services (2) | 37,368 | 78 | 15,673 | 75 |
| Total cost of revenues (3) | $39,608 | 43% | $17,737 | 29% |
(1) Percentage is calculated based on total software license revenues for the period indicated
(2) Percentage is calculated based on total services revenues for the period indicated
(3) Percentage is calculated based on total revenues for the period indicated
Cost of software licenses increased 100%9% in absolute dollar terms during the current quarter ended September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 to $1.4$2.2 million as compared to $0.7$2.1 million for the quarter ended September 30, 1999. For the nine months ended September 30, 2000, cost of software licenses increased 100% to $5.0 million as compared to $2.5 million for the comparable period during 1999.March 31, 2000.
In absolute dollar terms, the increasesincrease in cost of software licenses in both comparative periods werewas principally a result of increased sales of the Company’sour products and of royalty-bearing third party products. In relative percentage terms, cost of software licenses decreased principally as a result of the Company renegotiating the royalty provisions of agreements with three software suppliers from per copy royalties to fixed fee prepaid license fees.
Cost of services increased 372%138% during the current quarter ended September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 to $34.0$37.4 million as compared to $7.2$15.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 1999. For the nine months ended September 30, 2000, cost of services increased 426% to $80.0 million as compared to $15.2 million for the comparable period during 1999.
March 31, 2000. In absolute dollar terms, the increases in cost of services in both comparative periods werewas a result of higher business volumes as evidenced by increased services revenues. Overall costs increased as a result of opening new training and customer support facilities as well as additions to the Company’sour professional services staff and the employment of outside consultants to meet short-term consulting demands. As a percentage of services revenue, the increase in cost of services is a result of hiring new employees within WPSOBVGS who do not generate revenue during their internal training period and higher use of outside consultants in relationas compared to the extent previously used during the prior year period.
Operating Expenses and Other Income, net
Research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries, employee-related benefit costs and consulting fees incurred in association with the development of the Company’sour products. Costs incurred for the research and development of new software products are expensed as incurred until such time that technological feasibility, in the form of a working model, is established at which time such costs are capitalized and recorded at the lower of unamortized cost or net realizable value. The costs incurred by the Company subsequent to the establishment of a working model but prior to general release of the product have not been significant. To date, the Company haswe have not capitalized any costs related to the development of software development costs.for external use.
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, employee-related benefit costs, commissions and other incentive compensation, travel and entertainment and marketing program relatedprogram-related expenditures such as collateral materials, trade shows, public relations, advertising and creative services).services.
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, employee-related benefit costs and professional service fees.
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2000 | % (1) | 1999 | % (1) | 2000 | % (1) | 1999 | % (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
| (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Research and development | $ | 14,988 | 12 | % | $ | 3,816 | 13 | % | $ | 30,453 | 11 | % | $ | 9,986 | 14 | % | |||||||||
| Sales and marketing | 43,799 | 36 | 12,136 | 41 | 102,569 | 37 | 29,819 | 42 | |||||||||||||||||
| General and administrative | 8,198 | 7 | 2,119 | 7 | 18,542 | 7 | 5,001 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||
| Goodwill and intangible amortization | 66,308 | 55 | — | — | 121,712 | 44 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Charge for acquired in-process technology | — | — | — | — | 10,100 | 4 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
| Total Operating Expenses | $ | 133,293 | 110 | % | $ | 18,071 | 61 | % | $ | 283,376 | 103 | % | $ | 44,806 | 63 | % | |||||||||
______________
| Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||
| 2001 | % (1) | 2000 | % (1) | |
| (in thousands) | ||||
| Research and development | $26,971 | 30% | $5,759 | 9% |
| Sales and marketing | 52,481 | 57 | 25,200 | 41 |
| General and administrative | 10,590 | 12 | 3,611 | 6 |
| Goodwill and intangible amortization | 66,280 | 73 | - | - |
| Total Operating Expenses | $156,322 | 172% | $34,570 | 56% |
(1) Expressed as a percent of total revenues for the period indicated
Research and development expenses increased 295%368% during the current quarter ended September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 to $15.0$27.0 million as compared to $3.8$5.8 million for the quarter ended September 30, 1999. For the nine months ended September 30, 2000, research and development expenses increased 205% to $30.5 million as compared to $10.0 million for the comparable period during 1999.March 31, 2000. The increase in research and development expenses is primarily attributable to increased personnel as a result of additional hires as well as employees acquired in the Interleaf transaction, involved in the enhancement of existing applications and the development of the Company’sour next generation of products. The Company expectsIn addition, research and development expenses will continue toincreased as a result of an increase in absolute dollar terms.use of third party consultants.
Sales and marketing expenses increased 262%108% during the current quarter ended September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 to $43.8$52.5 million as compared to $12.1$25.2 million for the quarter ended September 30, 1999. For the nine months ended September 30, 2000, sales and marketing expenses increased 244% to $102.6 million as compared to $29.8 million for the comparable period during 1999.March 31, 2000. The increases in sales and marketing expenses reflect the cost of increased sales and marketing personnel from additional hires, as well as employees acquired in the Interleaf transaction, increased sales commissions paid on the greater sales levels, expenditures made to develop and expand sales
distribution channels, and costs incurred for increased promotional activities and marketing related programs. The Company expects sales and marketing expenses will continue to increase in absolute dollar terms.training activities.
General and administrative expenses increased 290%193% during the current quarter ended September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 to $8.2$10.6 million as compared to $2.1$3.6 million for the quarter ended September 30, 1999. For the nine months ended September 30, 2000, general and administrative expenses increased 270% to $18.5 million as compared to $5.0 million for the comparable period during 1999.March 31, 2000. The increase in general and administrative expenses is attributable to additional administrative and management personnel, as a result of additional hires and employees acquired in the Interleaf transaction, higher professional fees, and additional infrastructure to support the expansion of our operations and increases in the Company’s operations. Thegeneral reserves of our increased accounts receivable balance due to the increase in revenue.
We are attempting to reduce expenses in an effort to return to profitability during a period when revenues have been less than originally expected and therefore operating costs may decline in the near future but there can be no assurance that such decline will be enough to return the Company expects general and administrativeto profitability. Should revenues increase significantly, we would expect our expenses will continue to increase commensurate with increases in absolute dollar terms.revenues once we have reached an appropriate level of spending as a percentage of total revenues.
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles.As described in Note 56 in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements above, the Companywe acquired Interleaf in the quarter ended June 30, 2000. The Company hasWe have accounted for the acquisition as a purchase business combination. As a result of this transaction, the Companywe had recorded goodwill and other intangible assets on the balance sheet of $796.0$794.7 million. Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles assets related to the Interleaf acquisition was $66.3 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2000 and $121.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2000.March 31, 2001. The remaining $674.4$540.9 million of goodwill and other intangible assets will be amortized on a straight-line basis through the quarter ended June 30, 2003.
In-Process Technology.Other Income, netIn connection with
Other income, net consists of interest income, interest expense and other non-operating expenses. Other income, net decreased to $497,000 for the Interleaf acquisition,three months ended March 31, 2001 as compared to $7.2 million during the Company recordedthree months ended March 31, 2000. The decrease of $6.8 million is primarily attributable to a charge of $10.1 milliondecrease in the quarter ended June 30, 2000. Based upon the Company’s estimates preparedgain on sale of investments of $3.4 million, an increase in conjunction with a third-party valuation consultant, $10.1realized losses on cost-method investments of $1.3 million, was allocated to Acquired In-Process Technology and $796.0 million was allocated to goodwill and intangible assets. The amounts allocated to intangible assets include completed technologiesan increase in equity in net loss from an unconsolidated subsidiary of $20.4$1.1 million and assembled workforcesan increase in foreign currency loss of $8.5$1.0 million. The Company used the cost approach to estimate the value of the assembled workforce and the income approach to estimate the value of the business and technology projects acquired. The income approach takes into consideration the expected future cash flows attributable to the technology projects and discounts these cash flows to present value at a rate that appropriately reflects their risk. The value assigned to in-process technology was the amount attributable to the efforts of Interleaf up to the time of acquisition. This amount was estimated through application of the “stage of completion” calculation by multiplying the estimated present value of future cash flows, excluding costs of completion, by the percentage of completion of the purchased technology projects at the time of acquisition. Based upon these estimates, material net cash flows from the acquired business are expected to occur during the calendar year 2000. The cash flows for the completed and in-process technologies were discounted using discount rates of 15% to 35%.
The fair market value of the technologies acquired have been grouped in three classifications. Completed Technology represents technology that has successfully completed final Beta test. In-Process Technology represents technology that, as of the valuation date, has not yet entered Beta test or has commenced but not yet successfully completed final Beta test and has no alternative future use. Core Technology is technology that is being used in not only the current products and in-process technology projects, but also in future, not yet defined projects. Completed technologies are defined as those that have reached technological feasibility. The Company defines technological feasibility as the point at which the technologies have successfully completed Beta test.
The Completed Technologies include projects that enable companies to create, manage and deliver e-content for web enabled applications, using XML as its technology backbone and Microsoft Word for content creation. These projects also enable companies to manage XML and non-XML documents throughout their lifecycle in one integrated system.
The In-Process Technologies include a project to develop a version of current software which will run on a Unix-based operating system. As of the valuation date, the development of this project was approximately 34% complete and there was significant technological risk remaining. Another In-Process Technology project is an upgrade to an existing product that will take into account new W3C standards being developed for XML and will provide the capability for a user to author and create documents for a specific output device. As of the valuation date, this project was approximately 6% complete. This technology is not expected to reach technological feasibility until December of fiscal 2000. A third In-Process Technology project is being developed to provide a new, cost-effective means for a website to deliver content both to full-function personal computers and to
reduced-function devices such as wireless telephones and wireless personal digital assistants. As of the valuation date, this project was approximately 57% complete.
Core Technology encompasses both leveraged code and general technological know-how, experience and expertise regarding the design, manufacture and development of content management technology in existing products. It is therefore not appropriate to consider the value of the Core Technology to be part of the estimated value of In-Process Technology. Thus, the value of the In-Process Technology has been isolated by allocating a portion of the cash flow to this Core Technology that gives full recognition to its contribution.
As noted above, the income forecast method was used to value the business and technology projects acquired. The value of the acquired In-Process Technology and the Completed Technologies was estimated by discounting to present value the free cash flows generated by the products with which the technologies are associated over the remaining economic lives of the technologies. Discount rates used ranged from 15% to 35% and were based upon the relative risk associated with the completed technologies and the incomplete development projects and upon considerations such as stage of completion, remaining development milestones, technological uncertainties and projected cost to complete. The Company believes that these discount rates are consistent with the overall costs of capital and the relative risks of the completed technologies and the research and development project. The Company has valued the In-Process Technology using the “Percentage Completion Approach” as suggested by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. This approach varies from the traditional discounted cash flow approach that is used to value In-Process Technology. The Percentage Completion Approach does not include completion costs in the discounted cash flow analysis and the present value of future cash flows is multiplied by the estimated percentage complete as of the valuation date to determine the value of the acquired In-Process Technology.
The cost approach was utilized to value the assembled workforce. This approach considers the concept of avoided costs as an indicator of value and is an appropriate method for estimating the fair market value of an asset where reliable data for sales of comparable property are not available and where the property does not directly produce an income stream. The basis of the valuation is the estimated cost to recruit and train the new work force.
As part of the Purchase and Sale Agreement and the closing compilation documents, Non-Compete Agreements (the “Agreements”) were executed with certain Interleaf employees. No value of the aggregate purchase price was allocated to the Agreements based upon numerous facts and circumstances such as the likelihood of employees leaving the Company and the effect on the performance of the Company these employees would have should they leave the Company and were not barred from competing.
Income Taxes
During the quarter ended September 30, 2000, the CompanyMarch 31, 2001, we recognized tax expense of $8.6 million for an effective tax rate of approximately 39%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2000, the Company recognized$831,000. The tax expense of $21.8 million for an effective tax rate of approximately 39%. Duemainly related to the Company’s continuing trend of positive earnings, the Company has utilized a significant portion of its net operating loss carryforwards and as a result, the Company’s effective tax rate is similar to its statutory rate.international operations.
Litigation Settlement
On February 22, 2000, the Companywe reached a settlement agreement and entered into a license agreement with Art Technology Group (“ATG”) in connection with the lawsuit filed by the Companyus on December 11, 1998 against ATG alleging infringement of the Company’sour U.S. Patent No. 5,710,887. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, the Companywe granted ATG a nonexclusive, nontransferable, worldwide, perpetual license and waswe were paid $8.0 million by ATG at the effective date of the settlement and hashave begun to receive a total of $7.0 million payable in quarterly installments commencing February 24, 2000 (four consecutive quarterly payments of $750,000 during 2000 and eight consecutive quarterly payments of $500,000 during 2001 and 2002).
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
| September 30, 2000 | December 31, 1999 | ||||||
| (in thousands) | |||||||
| Cash, cash equivalents and liquid short-term investments | $ | 266,927 | $ | 348,581 | |||
| Working capital | $ | 262,843 | $ | 324,156 | |||
| Working capital ratio | 3.4 : 1 | 6.8 : 1 | |||||
| March 31, 2001 | December 31, 2000 | |
| (in thousands) | ||
| Cash, cash equivalents and liquid short-term investments | $176,328 | $222,534 |
| Long-term liquid investments | 72,571 | 78,769 |
| Working capital | $160,058 | $215,831 |
| Working capital ratio | 2.3 : 1 | 2.7 : 1 |
At September 30, 2000, the CompanyMarch 31, 2001, we had $266.9$176.3 million of cash, cash equivalents and liquid short-term investments, which represents a decrease of $81.7$46.2 million as compared to December 31, 1999. The Company2000. We currently has no significant capital commitments other than obligations under operating leases and $ 5.1have $4.6 million of outstanding term debt under itsour existing credit facility with a commercial bank.
Cash used for operating activities was $21.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2001 and cash provided by operating activities was $ 45.1 million and $18.9$29.0 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2000March 31, 2000. Net cash used for operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2001 was primarily attributed to a decrease in accounts payable and 1999, respectively.accrued expenses, a decrease in prepaid expenses, the net loss for the three months (less non-cash expenses) all partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable. Cash used for investing activities was $ 195.0$3.8 million and $35.4$31.8 million for the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2001 and 2000, and 1999, respectively, and was primarily for capital expenditures for our new facilities and purchase of short-term and long-term investments. In the three months ended March 31, 2001, the cash used for investing activities was offset by sales and maturities of our short-term and long-term investments. Cash provided by financing activities was $ 26.5$7.1 million and $9.9$6.8 million for the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2001 and 2000, and 1999, respectively, and consists primarily of proceeds from the issuance of common stock.
Capital expenditures were $38.9 million and $7.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Our capital expenditures consisted of purchases of operating resources to manage our operations and consisted of computer hardware and software, communications equipment, office furniture and fixtures and leasehold improvements. In February and April 2000, we entered into new facility lease agreements for approximately 519,000 square feet currently under construction. The Company believesexpects possession to occur in phases during the second and third quarters of 2001. Lease payments will be made on an escalating basis with the total future minimum lease payments amounting to $316.4 million. We will also have to contribute a significant amount towards construction costs of the facility. As of March 31, 2001, we have paid $44.5 million for improvements to the facility. The total estimated cost of improvements is approximately $56.7 million, but is subject to change.
We believe that itsour available cash and short-term investment resources, cash generated from operations and amounts available under itsour commercial credit facilities will be sufficient to meet itsour expected working capital and capital expenditure requirements for at least the next 12 months. This estimate is a forward-looking statement that involves risks and uncertainties, and actual results may vary as a result of a number of factors, including those discussed under “Factors Affecting Quarterly Operating Results” below and elsewhere herein. The CompanyWe may need to raise additional funds in order to support more rapid expansion, develop new or enhanced services, respond to competitive pressures, acquire complementary businesses or technologies or respond to unanticipated requirements. The CompanyWe may seek to raise additional funds through private or public sales of securities, strategic relationships, bank debt, financing under leasing arrangements or otherwise. If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage ownership of the stockholders of the Company will be reduced, stockholders may experience additional dilution or such equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the holders of the Company’sour common stock. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available on acceptable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, the Companywe may be unable to develop or enhance itsour products, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’sour business, financial condition and operating results.
Factors Affecting Quarterly Operating Results
The CompanyWe may experience significant fluctuations in quarterly operating results that may be caused by many factors including, but not limited to, those discussed below and herein, as set out in Items 7 and 7A in the Company’sour annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 19992000 and elsewhere therein and as disclosed in other documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Significant fluctuations in future quarterly operating results may be caused by many factors including, among others, the timing of introductions or enhancements of products and services by the Companyus or itsour competitors, market acceptance of new products, the mix of the Company’sour products sold, changes in pricing policies by the Companyus or itsour competitors, theour ability of the Company to retain customers, changes in the Company’sour sales incentive plans, budgeting cycles of itsour customers, customer order deferrals in anticipation of new products or enhancements by the Companyus or itsour competitors, nonrenewal of service agreements (which generally automatically renew for one year terms unless earlier terminated by either party upon 90-days notice), product life cycles, changes in strategy, seasonal trends, the mix of distribution channels through which the Company’sour products are sold, the mix of international and domestic sales, the rate at which new sales people become productive, changes in the level of operating expenses to support projected growth and general economic conditions. The Company anticipatesWe anticipate that a significant portion of itsour revenues will be derived from a limited number of orders, and the timing of receipt and
fulfillment of any such orders is expected to cause material fluctuations in the Company’sour operating results, particularly on a quarterly basis. Due to the foregoing factors, quarterly revenues and operating results are difficult to forecast, and the Company believeswe believe that period-to-period comparisons of itsour operating results will not necessarily be meaningful and should not be relied upon as any indication of future performance.
It is likely that the Company’sour future quarterly operating results from time to time will not meet the expectations of market analysts or investors, which may have an adverse effect on the price of the Company’sour common stock. The Company anticipatesWe anticipate that itsour operating expenses will continue to be substantial in relation to total revenues as it continueswe continue the development of itsour technology, increases itsincrease our sales and marketing activities, createscreate and expands itsexpand our distribution channels, grows itsgrow our professional services organization and implementsimplement the administrative infrastructure to support those operations.
Some of these risks and uncertainties relate to the new and rapidly evolving nature of the markets in which the Company operates.we operate. These related market risks include, among other things, the early stage of the developing online commerce market, the dependence of online commerce on the development of the Internet and its related infrastructure, the uncertainty pertaining to widespread adoption of online commerce and the risk of government regulation of the Internet. Other risks and uncertainties facing the Company relate to the Company’sour ability to, among other things, successfully implement itsour marketing strategies, respond to competitive developments, continue to develop and upgrade itsour products and technologies more rapidly than itsour competitors, and commercialize itsour products and services by incorporating these enhanced technologies. There can be no assurance that the Companywe will succeed in addressing any or all of these risks.
There has been a general downturn in the economy. We had missed our originally estimated results for the three months ended March 31, 2001 and as a result revised our projected estimate of revenue range for fiscal 2001. If the economic environment continues to decline, our future results may be significantly impacted.
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We develop products in the United States and market our products throughout the world. As a result, our financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. The Company’smajority of our sales are made in United States dollars. Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to itsour investment portfolio. The CompanyWe had no derivative financial instruments as of September 30, 2000March 31, 2001 or December 31, 1999. The Company invests2000. We invest in instruments that meet high credit quality standards and the amount of credit exposure to any one issue, issuer and type of instrument is limited. The Company doesWe do not expect any material loss with respect to the investment portfolio. Investments are carried at market value. The Company’s financial instrument holdingsfollowing represents our investment portfolio as of September 30, 2000 were analyzedMarch 31, 2001 by maturity:
| (in thousands) | Year Ended December 31, 2001 | Year Ended December 31, 2002 | Year Ended December 31, 2003 | Year Ended December 31, 2004 | Year Ended December 31, 2005 | Thereafter | Total |
| Cash equivalents | $ 61,476 | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ 61,476 |
| Short-term investments | $ 26,669 | $ 10,683 | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ 37,352 |
| Long-term investments | $ - | $ 43,296 | $ 18,421 | $ 10,854 | $ - | $ - | $ 72,571 |
| Total investment securities | $ 88,145 | $ 53,979 | $ 18,421 | $ 10,854 | $ - | $ - | $ 171,399 |
Not included in the above are checking and money market accounts of $73.3 million of cash and cash equivalents, $4.2 million of short term marketable securities in common stock and $21.4 million in equity investments.
Equity Investments
Equity investments consist of investments in non-public and publicly traded companies that are accounted for under either the cost method of accounting or the equity method of accounting.
Equity investments are accounted for under the cost method of accounting when we have a minority interest and do not have the ability to determine their sensitivityexercise significent influence. These investments are classified as available for sale and are carried at fair value when readily determinable market values exist or cost when such market values do not exist. Adjustments to fair value are recorded as a component of other comprehensive (loss) income unless the investments are considered permanently impaired in which case the adjustment is recorded as a component of other income (expense), net in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. During the three months ended March 31, 2001, we recorded an impairment charge related to equity investments of $1.3 million. There was no such charge during the three months ended March 31, 2000.
Equity investments are accounted for under the equity method of accounting when we have a minority interest rate changes. Inand have the sensitivity analysis,ability to exercise significant influence. These investments are classified as available for sale and are carried at cost with periodic adjustments to carrying value for our equity in net income (loss) of the Company assumed an adverse changeequity investee. Such adjustments are recorded as a component of other income, net. Any decline in interest ratesvalue of 250 basis points andour investments, which is other than a temporary decline, is charged to earnings during the potential effect onperiod in which the financial statementsimpairment occurs. During the three months ended March 31, 2001 we recorded our share of our equity investee’s net loss of $1.1 million. There was not material.no such charge during the three months ended March 31, 2000.
Item 1.Legal Proceedings
Not applicable.On April 20, 2001, the Company filed a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission reporting that several purported class action lawsuits had been filed against the Company and certain of its officers and directors. In each of the lawsuits, the plaintiffs seek to assert claims on behalf of a class of all persons who purchased securities of the Company between January 26, 2001 and April 2, 2001. The complaints allege that the Company and the individual defendants violated federal securities laws in connection with the Company's reporting of financial results during such period. The Company expects that all of the lawsuits will eventually be consolidated into a single action, as is customary in such cases. The Company believes that the lawsuits are without merit and it will defend itself vigorously.
Item 2.Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
(a) Modification of Constituent Instruments
Not applicable.
(b) Change in Rights
Not applicable.
(c) Changes in Securities
During the twelve months ended September 30, 2000 and as described below, the Company sold securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Each of these sales was intended to be exempt from the registration and prospectus delivery requirements under the Securities Act by virtue of Section 4(2) thereof due to, among other things, (i) the limited number of persons to whom the securities were issued, (ii) the distribution of disclosure documents to the investor, (iii) the fact that such person represented and warranted to the Company, among other things, that such person was acquiring the securities for investment only and not with a view to the resale or distribution thereof, (iv) with respect to the warrants described in (A) and (C) below, the fact that such warrants included a statement to the effect that such warrant had not been registered under the Securities Act or any state securities laws and could not be sold or transferred in the absence of such registration or an exemption therefrom and (v) with respect to the Common Stock described in (B) below, that a certificate representing the Common Stock was issued with a legend that such Common Stock had not been registered under the Securities Act or any state securities laws and could not be sold or transferred in the absence of such registration or an exemption therefrom.
(A) In November 1999, in connection with General Electric Company (“GE”) entering into a Master License Agreement (the “License Agreement”) with the Company, the Company issued a warrant to GE for that number of shares of its Common Stock as would result in a market value of such warrant equal to $125,000 using a Black-Scholes valuation model, on the date that GE purchased and the Company recognized revenue for $1.0 million in cumulative net license fees under the License Agreement, which date had to be on or before the one year anniversary of the signing of the License Agreement (the “Determination Date”). The parties have agreed that the Determination Date is February 1, 2000 and that the number of shares of Common Stock underlying the warrant is 5,588 with an exercise price per share of $48.44. The exercise period for the warrant began on the Determination Date and expires on February 1, 2002.
(B) In May 2000, the Company exchanged equity securities worth $3.0 million with netalone.com. The Company issued to netalone.com 76,665 shares of its Common Stock in exchange for the receipt from netalone.com of 23,366,700 shares of its Common Stock.
(C) In September 2000, in connection with Compaq Computer Corporation (“Compaq”) entering into a master marketing and license agreement with the Company, the Company issued a warrant to Compaq for 43,478 shares of its Common Stock with an exercise price of $34.50 per share. The exercise period for the warrant began on September 1, 2000 and expires on September 1, 2005.
Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
Item 5.Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6.Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
| Description | |
| 3.2 | Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation, dated June 28, 2000.(2) |
| 3.3 | Amended and restated Bylaws.(1) |
| 4.1 | References are hereby made to Exhibits 3.1 to 3.2.(1) |
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Proxy Statement filed on September 13, 1999.
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Company's 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 filed on August 14, 2000.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
Not applicable.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| BROADVISION, INC. | |||
| Date: | By: /s/ Pehong Chen | ||
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Date: | By: /s/ Randall C. Bolten | ||
Executive Vice President, Operations and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |