UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-13906

BALLANTYNE ~~OF OMAHA,~~STRONG, INC.

(Formally Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc.)

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware		47-0587703
(State or Other Jurisdiction of		(IRS Employer
Incorporation or Organization)		Identification Number)

4350 McKinley Street, Omaha, Nebraska		68112
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		Zip Code

(402) 453-4444

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date:

Class		Outstanding as of ~~May 08,~~August 6, 2009
Common Stock, $.01, par value		~~14,111,908~~14,138,908 shares

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page No.

		PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

	Consolidated Balance Sheets, ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008		1

	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008		2

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008		3

	Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		4

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		22

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		31

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		31

		PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		32

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		32

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		32

Item 6.	Exhibits	32	33

	Signatures	33	34

Table of Contents

Item 1. Financial Statements

Ballantyne ~~of Omaha,~~Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

~~March 31,~~
June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008

	March 31,			December 31			June 30,			December 31,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	11,349,954		$	11,424,984		$	21,168,964		$	11,424,984
Restricted cash	701,498			701,498			702,158			701,498
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $210,480 in 2009 and $195,141 in 2008)	11,883,223			7,038,258
Accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $230,507 in 2009 and $195,141 in 2008)							10,013,868			7,038,258
Unbilled revenue							3,571,525			—
Inventories, net	9,076,933			9,476,687			8,950,484			9,476,687
Recoverable income taxes	1,157,235			1,111,118			1,157,682			1,111,118
Deferred income taxes	2,222,128			2,134,699			2,251,904			2,134,699
Consignment inventory	336,553			527,027			192,794			527,027
Other current assets	1,265,953			356,855			1,241,244			356,855

Total current assets	37,993,477			32,771,126			49,250,623			32,771,126
Investment in joint venture	2,944,728			3,138,568			2,711,008			3,138,568
Investment in securities	8,816,320			8,883,420			—			8,883,420
Property, plant and equipment, net	3,496,259			3,453,363			3,500,728			3,453,363
Intangible assets, net	1,248,862			1,374,438			1,223,865			1,374,438
Other assets	17,257			17,257			17,257			17,257
Deferred income taxes	1,647,492			1,474,766			1,502,233			1,474,766

Total assets	$	56,164,395		$	51,112,938		$	58,205,714		$	51,112,938

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	9,108,338		$	6,470,903		$	9,723,607		$	6,470,903
Warranty reserves	509,776			491,556			445,823			491,556
Accrued group health insurance claims	212,009			219,215			222,589			219,215
Accrued bonuses	91,530			185,064			251,493			185,064
Other accrued expenses	2,586,971			1,943,969			2,107,803			1,943,969
Customer deposits	2,531,169			1,216,590			2,229,169			1,216,590
Income tax payable	387,591			433,533			759,328			433,533

Total current liabilities	15,427,384			10,960,830			15,739,812			10,960,830
Deferred income taxes	244,263			311,413			253,558			311,413
Other accrued expenses, net of current portion	870,299			1,006,056			857,889			1,006,056

Total liabilities	16,541,946			12,278,299			16,851,259			12,278,299
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; Authorized 1,000,000 shares, none outstanding	—			—			—			—
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; Authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued 16,233,001 shares in 2009 and 16,168,510 shares in 2008	162,330			161,685
Common stock, par value $.01 per share; Authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued 16,278,890 shares in 2009 and 16,168,510 shares in 2008							162,788			161,685
Additional paid-in capital	35,162,573			35,085,228			35,215,004			35,085,228
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation	(971,635		)	(890,851		)	(719,581		)	(890,851		)
Unrealized loss on investments in securities, net of tax	(493,142		)	(742,027		)	—			(742,027		)
Minimum pension liability	93,658			93,658			93,658			93,658
Retained earnings	21,051,345			20,509,626			21,985,266			20,509,626
	55,005,129			54,217,319			56,737,135			54,217,319
Less 2,139,982 of common shares in treasury, at cost	(15,382,680		)	(15,382,680		)	(15,382,680		)	(15,382,680		)

Total stockholders’ equity		39,622,449			38,834,639			41,354,455			38,834,639

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	56,164,395		$	51,112,938		$	58,205,714		$	51,112,938

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Ballantyne ~~of Omaha,~~Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Three and Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

							Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008
Net revenues	$	17,143,453		$	14,197,172		$	19,602,707		$	13,643,104		$	36,746,160		$	27,840,276
Cost of revenues	13,764,383			11,887,291			15,350,114			11,593,249			29,114,497			23,480,540
Gross profit	3,379,070			2,309,881			4,252,593			2,049,855			7,631,663			4,359,736

Selling and administrative expenses:
Selling	668,399			787,802			767,791			742,718			1,436,190			1,530,520
Administrative	2,076,660			2,025,296			1,875,652			1,634,972			3,952,312			3,660,268
Total selling and administrative expenses	2,745,059			2,813,098			2,643,443			2,377,690			5,388,502			5,190,788
Loss on disposal of assets, net	—			(1,285		)
Gain on the sale of assets							—			258,170			—			258,170
Loss on disposal of assets							(1,943		)	—			(1,943		)	(1,285		)
Income (loss) from operations	634,011			(504,502		)	1,607,207			(69,665		)	2,241,218			(574,167		)

Interest income	41,130			146,186			29,404			129,350			70,534			275,536
Interest expense	(8,113		)	(8,535		)	(9,328		)	(9,163		)	(17,441		)	(17,698		)
Equity in loss of joint venture	(184,512		)	(112,991		)	(233,625		)	(184,909		)	(418,137		)	(297,900		)
Other income, net	181,237			26,792
Other income (expense), net							(68,333		)	19,882			112,904			46,674
Income (loss) before income taxes	663,753			(453,050		)	1,325,325			(114,505		)	1,989,078			(567,555		)
Income tax benefit (expense)	(122,034		)	198,614			(391,404		)	(5,576		)	(513,438		)	193,038
Net income (loss)	$	541,719		$	(254,436	)	$	933,921		$	(120,081	)	$	1,475,640		$	(374,517	)

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.04		$	(0.02	)	$	0.07		$	(0.01	)	$	0.11		$	(0.03	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.04		$	(0.02	)	$	0.07		$	(0.01	)	$	0.10		$	(0.03	)

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic	13,988,206			13,858,440			13,995,286			13,890,882			13,991,766			13,874,661
Diluted	14,111,509			13,858,440			14,138,239			13,890,882			14,127,450			13,874,661

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Ballantyne ~~of Omaha,~~Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

	2009			2008			2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	541,719		$	(254,436	)	$	1,475,640		$	(374,517	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for doubtful accounts	23,587			20,031			43,098			26,680
Provision for obsolete inventory	147,643			174,925			227,728			336,069
Depreciation of consignment inventory	148,691			299,441			297,479			593,625
Depreciation of property, plant, and equipment	217,498			219,566			434,751			451,900
Amortization of intangibles	93,177			110,768			190,976			220,076
Equity in loss of joint venture	184,512			112,991			418,137			297,900
Loss on disposal of fixed assets	—			1,285			1,943			1,285
Gain on sale of assets							—			(258,170		)
Deferred income taxes	(454,871		)	(200,609		)	(609,393		)	(306,424		)
Share-based compensation expense	48,081			18,498			106,614			75,022
Excess tax benefits from stock options exercised							—			(92,362		)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(5,124,365		)	(399,623		)	(10,275,086		)	146,607
Unbilled revenue							3,571,525			—
Inventories	228,047			(1,397,141		)	332,186			(2,074,911		)
Consignment inventory	41,783			1,772,624			36,754			1,862,466
Other current assets	(888,474		)	(398,711		)	(882,648		)	(264,799		)
Accounts payable	2,828,569			(82,786		)	3,400,921			(952,077		)
Warranty reserves	25,858			10,891			(55,012		)	(33,778		)
Accrued group health insurance claims	(7,206		)	(16,006		)	3,374			72,228
Accrued bonus	(38,952		)	24,372			64,948			102,696
Other accrued expenses	530,388			694,042			27,017			60,091
Customer deposits	1,316,466			277,285			1,010,201			(22,177		)
Current income taxes	(78,018		)	(318,458		)	252,175			(305,425		)
Other assets							—			(1,850		)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	(215,867		)	668,949			73,328			(439,845		)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Increase in acquisition costs	—			(46,969		)	—			(46,969		)
Investment in joint venture	9,328			(12,096		)	9,423			(17,914		)
Proceeds from sale of assets							—			271,360
Increase in restricted investments							(660		)	(2,482		)
Capital expenditures	(274,847		)	(299,180		)	(457,146		)	(492,115		)
Proceeds from sales of investment securities	450,000			—
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	184,481			(358,245		)

Proceeds from sales and redemptions of investment securities							10,025,000			1,225,000
Net cash provided by investing activities							9,576,617			936,880
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options							—			59,113
Excess tax benefits from stock options exercised							—			92,362
Net cash provided by financing activities	—			—			—			151,475

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	(43,644		)	(16,731		)	94,035			(4,782		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(75,030		)	293,973
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents							9,743,980			643,728
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	11,424,984			4,220,355			11,424,984			4,220,355
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	11,349,954		$	4,514,328		$	21,168,964		$	4,864,083

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Ballantyne ~~of Omaha,~~Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

1. Nature of Operations

On May 20, 2009, the Company amended its Certificate of Incorporation to change the Company’s name from Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc.~~, a Delaware corporation~~ to Ballantyne Strong, Inc. (“Ballantyne” or the “Company”), to align the Company with a name known to a majority of the Company’s customers and to provide branding to the trademark name “Strong.”

Ballantyne, a Delaware corporation, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Strong Westrex, Inc., Strong Technical Services, Inc., ~~and~~ Strong / MDI Screen Systems, Inc., and the American West Beijing Trading Company, Ltd., design, develop, manufacture, service and distribute theatre and lighting systems. The Company’s products are distributed to movie exhibition companies, sports arenas, auditoriums, amusement parks and special venues.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all ~~wholly-owned subsidiaries and controlling interests for the periods presented.~~majority-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and consequently do not include all of the disclosures normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual reporting purposes or those made in the Company’s annual Form 10-K/A filing. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year-ended December 31, 2008.

In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature necessary to present a fair statement of the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows for the respective interim periods. The results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of trends or results expected for a full year. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Management Estimates

The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results and changes in facts and circumstances may alter such estimates and affect results of operations and financial position in future periods.

Except as noted below, no changes were made to the Company’s significant accounting policies disclosed in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.

Table of Contents

Ballantyne ~~of Omaha,~~Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. ~~157~~15 which delayed the effective date of FASB 157 for certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. In October 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-3, “Determining Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a Market that is not Active.” FSP No. FAS 157-3 clarifies the application of FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, in a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining the fair value of a financial asset when the market for that financial asset is not active. FSB No. FAS 157-3 is effective for the Company beginning in the third quarter of 2008. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations. See further discussion in Note 9.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141(R)”)”. SFAS No. 141(R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer in a business combination recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. SFAS No. 141(R) also establishes disclosures requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. The provisions of SFAS No. 141(R) is effective for any business combinations occurring on or after January 1, 2009. The adoption will impact the Company’s accounting for future acquisitions and related transaction costs.

In September 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4, “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees” which amends FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation FIN 45. FSP No. FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 requires sellers of credit derivatives, including credit derivatives embedded in hybrid instruments, to disclose additional information about exposure to potential loss from credit-risk-related events. The new disclosures require both sellers of credit derivatives and guarantors to disclose the current status of payment/performance risk. The disclosures are effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP No. FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“No. 161”)”. This statement amends FASB Statement No. 133 to require enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities. The provisions of SFAS No. 161 are effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2009. The adoption of FASB No. 161 did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP SFAS No. 107-1 and Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (“FSP SFAS 107-1 and APB 28-1”). This FSP extends the requirements of SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 also amend APB Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at interim reporting periods. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 were effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2009.

Table of Contents

Ballantyne ~~of Omaha,~~Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

In February 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-a, FAS 124-a, and EITF 99-20-b, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.” This statement amends FASB No. 115 and No. 124 and EITF Issue No. 99-20 to change the amount of other-than-temporary impairment that is recognized in earnings when there are credit losses on a debt security for which management does not intend to sell and for which it is more likely than not that the entity will not have to sell prior to recovery of the noncredit impairment. The provisions of this statement are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of these pronouncements did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In February 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 115-e, “Determining when a Market for an Asset or Liability is Active or Inactive and determining when a Transaction is distressed.” This statement is expected to reaffirm the exit price objective of fair value measurements and to provide guidance on inactive markets and distressed transactions. The provisions of FSP FAS No. 115-e are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after June15, 2009. The adoption of these pronouncements did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events (“SFAS No. 165”).” This statement addresses accounting and disclosure requirements related to subsequent events. SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of these pronouncements did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS No. 162”)”. SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). SFAS No. 162 will be effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s related amendments to remove the GAAP hierarchy from auditing standards. The Company does not believe the adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In ~~February~~June 2009, the FASB issued ~~FSP FAS 115-a, FAS 124-a, and EITF 99-20-b, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.”~~SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). This statement ~~amends FASB No. 115 and No. 124 and EITF Issue No. 99-20~~requires reporting entities to ~~change the amount of other-than-temporary impairment that~~evaluate former QSPE’s for consolidation, changes to approach to determining a VIE’s primary beneficiary from a quantitative assessment to a qualitative assessment designed to identify a controlling financial interest. This statement is recognized in earnings when there are credit losses on a debt security for which management does not intend to sell and for which it is more likely than not that the entity will not have to sell prior to recoveryeffective as of the ~~noncredit impairment.~~beginning of a Company’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. The ~~provisions of this statement are effective for interim and annual periods ending after June15, 2009. As of March 31, 2009, the~~ Company does not believe ~~that FSP FAS 115-a, FAS 124-a, and EITF 99-20-b~~the adoption will have a material ~~effect~~impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In ~~February~~June 2009, the FASB issued ~~FSP FAS 115-e, “Determining when a Market~~SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS No. 168”).” The Codification under SFAS No. 168 will become the exclusive authoritative reference for ~~an Asset or Liability is Active or Inactive~~nongovernmental U.S. GAAP for use in financial statements issued for interim and determining when a Transaction is distressed.” This statement is expected to reaffirm the exit price objective of fair value measurements and to provide guidance on inactive markets and distressed transactions.annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The ~~provisions of FSP FAS No. 115-e are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after June15, 2009. As of March 31, 2009, the~~ Company does not believe ~~that FSP FAS No. 115-e~~the adoption will have a material ~~effect~~impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

In June 2009, the FASB issued EITF 08-1, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” This issue revises the current accounting treatment under EITF 00-21to specifically address how to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting. This issue is applicable to revenue arrangements entered into or materially during Company’s first fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2010. The Company does not believe the adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

3. Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share

The Company computes and presents earnings (loss) per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Basic earnings (loss) per share has been computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share has been computed on the basis of the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding after giving effect to potential common shares from dilutive stock options. The following table provides a reconciliation between basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:

Three Months Ended March 31,

2009

2008

Basic earnings (loss) per share:

Income (loss) applicable to common stock

$
541,719

$
(254,436
)
Weighted average common shares outstanding

13,988,206

13,858,440

Basic earnings (loss) per share

$
0.04

$
(0.02
)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:

Income (loss) applicable to common stock

$
541,719

$
(254,436
)
Weighted average common shares outstanding

13,988,206

13,858,440

Assuming conversion of options outstanding

123,303

—

Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding

14,111,509

13,858,440

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

$
0.04

$
(0.02
)

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008			2009		2008
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) applicable to common stock	$	933,921	$	(120,081	)	$	1,475,640	$	(374,517	)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	13,995,286		13,890,882			13,991,766		13,874,661
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.07	$	(0.01	)	$	0.11	$	(0.03	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Income (loss) applicable to common stock	$	933,921	$	(120,081	)	$	1,475,640	$	(374,517	)
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	13,995,286		13,890,882			13,991,766		13,874,661
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock awards	142,953		—			135,684		—
Dilutive weighted average common shares outstanding	14,138,239		13,890,882			14,127,450		13,874,661
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.07	$	(0.01	)	$	0.10	$	(0.03	)

For the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009, options to purchase ~~133,125~~118,125 shares of common stock at a weighted average price of ~~$4.54~~$4.55 per share were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share as the options exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares. For the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2008, options outstanding were not included in the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share as the Company reported a loss from continuing operations available to common stockholders. Options outstanding as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 expire between May 2010 and May 2012.

Table of Contents

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

4.Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net, shown in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets includes the unrealized loss on investments in securities, pension liability adjustments and the accumulated foreign currency translation adjustment. The following table shows the difference between the Company’s reported net earnings (loss) and its comprehensive income (loss):

	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	March 31,						June 30,					June 30,
$ in thousands	2009			2008
							2009		2008			2009		2008
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss)	$	541,719		$	(254,436	)	$	933,921	$	(120,081	)	$	1,475,640	$	(374,517	)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment in securities, net of tax	248,885			(1,042,720		)
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment in securities							—		96,375			—		(946,345		)
Foreign currency translation adjustment	(80,784		)	(159,266		)	252,054		30,576			171,270		(128,690		)
Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	709,820		$	(1,456,422	)	$	1,185,975	$	6,870		$	1,646,910	$	(1,449,552	)

Included in unrealized gain (loss) on investment in securities are realized holding losses arising during the current period of approximately $1,142,000 less a reclassification adjustment for gains recorded on the settlement of the securities included in net income of approximately $1,142,000.

5.Warranty Reserves

The Company generally grants a warranty to its customers for a one-year period following the sale of all new equipment and on selected repaired and used equipment for a one-year period following the repair. The warranty period is extended under certain circumstances and for certain products. The Company accrues for these costs at the time of sale or repair or when events dictate that additional accruals are necessary. The following table summarizes warranty activity for the periods indicated below:

Three Months Ended March 31,

2009

2008

Warranty accrual at beginning of period

$
491,556

$
381,710

Charged to expense

152,884

48,999

Amounts written off, net of recoveries

(134,664
)
(38,550
)
Warranty accrual at end of period

$
509,776

$
392,159

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Warranty accrual at beginning of period	$	509,776		$	392,159		$	491,556		$	381,710
Charged to expense	39,249			52,553			192,133			101,552
Amounts written off, net of recoveries	(103,202		)	(97,141		)	(237,866		)	(135,691		)
Warranty accrual at end of period	$	445,823		$	347,571		$	445,823		$	347,571

6.Investment in Digital Link II Joint Venture

On March 6, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement with RealD to form an operating entity Digital Link II, LLC (the “LLC”). Under the agreement, the LLC was formed with the Company and RealD as the only two members with membership interests of 44.4% and 55.6%, respectively. The LLC was formed for purposes of commercializing certain 3D technology and to fund the deployment of digital projector systems and servers to exhibitors. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009, total current and non-current assets of the joint venture amounted to approximately ~~$2.0~~$1.6 million and ~~$13.6~~$13.2 million, respectively. Total liabilities and equity at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 amounted to ~~$8.8~~$8.5 million and ~~$6.8~~$6.3 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, total current and non-current assets of the joint venture amounted to approximately $0.9 million and $12.1 million, respectively. Total liabilities and equity at December 31, 2008 amounted to $5.7 million and $7.3 million, respectively.

Table of Contents

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

The joint venture ~~which~~ operates on a ~~fiscal year end of~~ March 31st, fiscal year end. If the joint venture reported on a December 31st fiscal year end, the joint venture would have reported a net loss for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008 of approximately ~~$0.5~~$1.0 million and ~~$0.3~~$0.5 million, respectively. The net losses ~~are~~ primarily resulted from interest expense incurred on outstanding notes and depreciation expense related to projection equipment on consignment to third party customers.

The Company accounts for its investment by the equity method. Under this method, the Company records its proportionate share of Digital Link II’s net income or loss based on the most recently available financial statements. The Company’s portion of losses of the LLC amounted to approximately ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million and ~~$0.1~~$0.3 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

7.Guarantees

During 2009, the Company provided a guarantee to a note entered into by the LLC to finance digital projection equipment deployed in the normal course of business. The loan provides for borrowings of approximately $0.3 million and bears interest at a rate of 7.2% per annum. The Company’s guarantee of the note is limited to its 44.4% ownership percentage, which amounts to approximately $0.1 million. RealD, who holds a membership interest of 55.6% in the joint venture, has provided a guarantee for the remainder of the note outstanding, which amounts to approximately $0.2 million. During 2008, the Company provided a guaranteeguarantees to notes entered into by the LLC to finance digital projection equipment deployed in the normal course of business. The loans ~~provide~~provided for borrowings of approximately $1.3 million and bear interest at a rate of 7.2% per annum. The Company’s portion of the guarantee of the notes at the time the notes were entered into was limited to its 44.4% ownership percentage, which amounted to approximately $0.6 million. RealD, who holds a membership interest of 55.6% in the joint venture, provided a guarantee for the remainder of the note outstanding, which amounted to approximately $0.7 million at the time the note was entered into.

During 2008, the Company provided guarantees to notes entered into by the LLC to finance digital projection equipment deployed in the normal course of business. The loans provided for borrowings of approximately $0.7 million and $2.5 million, respectively and bear interest at rates of 7.2% and 7.0% per annum. The Company’s portion of the guarantee of the ~~note is~~notes at the time the notes were entered into was limited to its 44.4% ownership percentage, which amounts to approximately $1.4 million. RealD, who holds a membership interest of 55.6% in the joint venture, ~~has~~ provided a guarantee for the remainder of the notes outstanding, which ~~amounts~~amounted to approximately $1.8 million at the time the note was entered into.

As of June 30, 2009, the Company’s guarantee on the remaining balance of the notes outstanding was approximately $1.6 million. The Company has recorded a liability for the fair value of the obligations undertaken by issuing the guarantees which amounted to approximately $0.07 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009. The guarantees will expire by the end of 2011. Under the terms of the guarantees, the Company and RealD would be required to fulfill the guarantees should the joint venture be in default of its loan or contract terms.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

8.Investments

The Company ~~has~~had certain investments in auction-rate securities which ~~are~~were classified as available-for-sale ~~securities. Interest rates on these auction-rate~~ securities are reset through an auction process that resets the applicable interest at pre-determined intervals every seven days. The investment securities are held within closed-end funds that continue to be AAA rated and ~~fully collateralized at a minimum 200% net asset to fund ratio. The Company accounts~~accounted for ~~its investments~~ in accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities”.

During 2008, the market for the Company’s investments in auction-rate securities began experiencing a liquidity issue when the securities came up for auction due to an imbalance of buyers and sellers for the securities. These conditions continue to persist in 2009. The Company cannot predict how long the current imbalance in the auction market will continue. As a result, for a period of time, the Company may be unable to liquidate the auction rate securities held until a successful auction occurs or the securities are redeemed by the issuer of the investments. Based on the continued unsuccessful auctions of these investments, the investment securities have been classified as noncurrent assets within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. As of March 31,In June 2009, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with a financial institution with whom the Company has a banking relationship to sell, at the Company’s option, all or a portion of its outstanding auction-rate securities (“ARS”) at par, plus accrued interest. The settlement agreement provides for a provision on confidentiality and a release of the financial institution form claims related to the Company’s purchase, ownership and sale of the securities. Subsequently, in June 2009, the Company sold its remaining outstanding ARS under the terms of the settlement agreement which amounted to $9,375,000 plus interest accrued. During 2009, the Company also liquidated, at par, ~~$3,425,000 of its auction rate securities~~outstanding ARS which amounted to $650,000 of which $50,000 were sold through the normal auction process ~~with the remaining amounts~~and $600,000 were redeemed by the fund itself ~~since the beginning of the liquidity issue. Of these amounts $450,000 were received during the three months ended March 31, 2009.~~

Due to the inability to trade all of the Company’s investments in auction-rate securities in the current market, the Company continues to earn interest on its investments at the maximum contractual default rate. The weighted average maximum contractual default rate being earned as of March 31, 2009 was 1.08%.

Based on the valuations performed (Note 9), the Company determined there was an impairment in the fair value of its investments of approximately $0.8 million. When events or circumstances exist that require the Company to record impairment on its investments, the Company determines whether the impairment should be classified as “temporary” or “other-than-temporary.” A temporary impairment charge results in an unrealized loss being recorded in the other comprehensive income (loss) component of stockholders’ equity. Such an unrealized loss does not affect net income (loss) for the applicable accounting period. An other-than-temporary impairment charge is recorded as a realized loss in the consolidated statement of operations and reduces net income (loss) for the applicable accounting period. The differentiating factors between temporary and other-than temporary impairment are primarily the length of the time and the extent to which the market value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. Based on this assessment as of March 31, 2009, the Company determined the impairment in the fair value of its investments is temporary. However, if market conditions would deteriorate further and the anticipated recovery in market values does not occur, the Company may be required to record additional unrealized losses in other comprehensive income (loss) or an other-than-temporary impairment charge which could also impact the Company’s results of operations or liquidity and capital resources in future periods.

Table of Contents

Ballantyne ~~of Omaha,~~Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

The Company previously recorded a temporary impairment as an unrealized loss on the outstanding ARS in other comprehensive income prior to settlement of the ARS. As a result of entering into the settlement agreement, the Company recorded the temporary impairment as a realized loss of approximately $1.1 million within other income (expense). The Company also recorded an offsetting gain on the settlement in the amount of $1.1 million which was recorded in other income (expense) during the current period.

9.Fair Value of Financial Instruments

In April 2009, the Company adopted the provisions of FSP 107-1 and APB 28-1. The fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses equal or approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The estimated fair values and related assumptions used to estimate fair value of the Company’s cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses are disclosed below.

SFAS 157 establishes a hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon observable independent market inputs and unobservable market assumptions. Inputs refer broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. Considerable judgment is required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. The following represents the three categories of inputs used in determining the fair value of financial assets and liabilities:

	Level 1:		Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

	Level 2:		Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.

	Level 3:		Unobservable inputs that are used in the measurement of assets and liabilities. Unobservable inputs require management to make certain projections and assumptions about the information that would be used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability.

Because of the inability to trade the Company’s auction-rate securities, a readily determinable fair value using market observables (Level 1 input) does not exist. Therefore, in accordance with SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurement,” the Company obtained Gifford Fong Associates, a third party valuation expert, to assist with the determination of the estimated fair value of its auction-rate securities (Level 3 input). The valuation expert used a cash flow model to determine the fair value of these securities. The significant inputs and assumptions used in preparing this model are summarized as follows:

· ~~Interest rate indices—LIBOR curve and commercial paper rates obtained.~~

· Rating transition matrix—the rating transition matrix gives transition probabilities for the underlying collateral migrating from one rating level to another in one year, particularly the transition probability to default status. The rating transition matrix is constructed from rating migration and default data published by various rating agencies.

· ~~Default and recovery rates—the default rate is estimated using a credit spread (discount margin) over the risk free rate curve obtained.~~

· ~~Illiquidity risk—in a distressed market, investors may not be able to find willing buyers, hence reduced liquidity.~~

· Estimate for the timing of full redemption of the securities—the estimate for full redemption is based on a weighted average of redemption periods for short term, medium term and perpetual term securities.

· ~~Estimated weighted average coupon—the yield, considered to be the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), is related to the financial strength and outlook of each fund.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2009 are summarized in the following table by the type of inputs applicable to the fair value measurements under the provisions of SFAS No. 157:

Fair Value Measurements
at Reporting Date Using

Description

3/31/09

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

Available-for-sale securities

$
8,816,320

$
—

$
—

$
8,816,320

A reconciliation of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis with the use of significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) from January 1, 2009 to ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 follows:

	Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)						Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	Investments in Auction-Rate Securities			Total			Investments in Auction-Rate Securities			Total
Beginning balance	$	8,883,420		$	8,883,420		$	8,883,420		$	8,883,420
Total unrealized gains or losses Included in other comprehensive income (loss)	382,900			382,900
Purchases, issuances and settlements	(450,000		)	(450,000		)
Total gains or losses (realized/ unrealized)
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)							1,141,580			1,141,580
Sales and settlements							(10,025,000		)	(10,025,000		)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3	—			—			—			—
Ending balance	$	8,816,320		$	8,816,320		$	—		$	—
The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings (loss) (or changes in net assets) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at March 31, 2009.	$	—		$	—
The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings (loss) (or changes in net assets) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at June 30, 2009.							$	—		$	—

~~10. Inventories~~

~~Inventories consist of the following:~~

March 31,
2009

December 31,
2008

Raw materials and components

$
4,105,870

$
4,938,126

Work in process

695,839

465,998

Finished goods

4,275,224

4,072,563

$
9,076,933

$
9,476,687

~~The inventory balances are net of reserves of approximately $2,969,000 and $2,792,000 as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.~~

1110

Table of Contents

Ballantyne ~~of Omaha,~~Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

10.Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
Raw materials and components	$	4,086,990	$	4,938,126
Work in process	523,060		465,998
Finished goods	4,340,434		4,072,563
	$	8,950,484	$	9,476,687

The inventory balances are net of reserves of approximately $2,956,000 and $2,792,000 as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

11.Consignment Inventory

Digital and film projection equipment is provided to potential customers for consignment and demonstration purposes under customer use agreements. Additionally, during 2007, the Company entered into operating lease agreements with third party customers for the use of certain projection equipment of which a majority of the projection equipment was sold during the first quarter of 2008. The Company recognized revenue in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, Revenue Recognition, upon delivery of title to customer. No other income was generated under these operating lease agreements. The Company considered the guidance contained within ARB 43, EITF 01-08 and SFAS No. 13 to determine the proper accounting treatment for the agreements referenced above.

Consignment inventory is reviewed for impairment by comparing the inventory to estimated future usage and sales. Digital and film projection equipment on consignment, net of amortization of approximately $0.3 million and $1.0 million, amounted to approximately ~~$0.3~~$0.2 million and $0.5 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

12.~~12.~~ Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment include the following:

	March 31, 2009			December 31, 2008			June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
Land	$	313,500		$	313,500		$	313,500		$	313,500
Buildings and improvements	4,054,593			3,992,556			4,170,910			3,992,556
Machinery and equipment	5,156,556			5,102,713			5,230,904			5,102,713
Office furniture and fixtures	2,134,130			2,015,296			2,200,780			2,015,296
	11,658,779			11,424,065			11,916,094			11,424,065
Less accumulated depreciation	(8,162,520		)	(7,970,702		)	(8,415,366		)	(7,970,702		)
Net property, plant and equipment	$	3,496,259		$	3,453,363		$	3,500,728		$	3,453,363

~~Depreciation expense amounted to approximately $217,000 and $220,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.~~

1211

Table of Contents

Ballantyne ~~of Omaha,~~Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

Depreciation expense amounted to approximately $218,000 and $435,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively as compared to approximately $232,000 and $452,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.

13.Accrued Expenses

The major components of other accrued expenses are as follows:

	March 31,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Employee related	$	1,154,329	$	817,171	$	954,829	$	817,171
Interest and taxes	548,572		524,883		472,966		524,883
Acquisition and related accruals	682,262		711,037		684,667		711,037
Post-retirement benefit obligation	377,147		374,365		379,272		374,365
Legal and professional fees	388,455		166,346		260,099		166,346
Other	306,505		356,223		213,859		356,223
Total	$	3,457,270	$	2,950,025	$	2,965,692	$	2,950,025

14.Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. The Company uses an estimate of its annual effective rate based on the facts and circumstances at the time to record interim income tax expense. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized and a related valuation allowance is deemed necessary. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009, a valuation allowance has not been recorded. However, if the Company experiences difficulties in achieving its forecasts of taxable income in the current fiscal year, the Company may be required to record a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets recorded which would impact the Company’s results of operations. The Company has recorded a receivable for the amount of an income tax refund due to the Company as a result of the carry back of certain net operating losses to previous year’s taxable income.

The effective tax rate (calculated as a ratio of income tax benefit (expense) to pretax income (loss), inclusive of equity method investment losses) was approximately 29.5% and 25.8% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to 4.9% and 34.0% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008. The effective rate change from year to year is a result of differing foreign and U.S. tax rates applied to respective pre-tax income (loss) amounts by tax jurisdiction.

The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes (as amended), effective January 1, 2007. The Company’s uncertain tax positions are related to tax years that remain subject to examination by the relevant taxable authorities. The Company has examinations not yet initiated for Federal purposes for fiscal years 2005 through 2007. In most cases, the Company has examinations open for State or local jurisdictions based on the particular jurisdiction’s statute of limitations. The Company does not currently have any

Table of Contents

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

examinations in process. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, total unrecognized tax benefits amounted to approximately $0.1 million.

Estimated amounts related to estimated underpayment of income taxes, including interest and penalties, are classified as a component of tax expense in the consolidated statements of operations and were not material for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009. Amounts accrued for estimated underpayment of income taxes amounted to $0.1 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The accruals largely related to state tax matters. Federal and state income taxes have not been provided on accumulated but undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries aggregating approximately ~~$2.1~~$3.3 million and $0.8 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, as such earnings have been permanently reinvested in the ~~business and it is not the Company’s intent to distribute these earnings. Therefore, the~~business. The determination of the amount of the unrecognized deferred tax liability related to the undistributed earnings is not practicable.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~15.

~~Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~15. Note Receivable~~

During July 2006, the Company entered into a note receivable arrangement with Digital Link LLC (Digital Link) pertaining to the sale and installation of digital projectors. The sale amounted to $780,000 of which 25% was due upon installation and was collected. The remaining amounts are due over a 5-year period at an 8% interest rate. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, $301,047 and $330,211, respectively was due from Digital Link. Only the payments received on the note receivable totaling $478,953 were recorded as revenue with the remaining amounts to be recognized as revenue in future periods when the cash is received from Digital Link as described in the note receivable arrangement or when collections from the Digital Link can be reasonably assured. The costs incurred with the sale of projectors to Digital Link were expensed during 2006 with no future associated costs to be incurred.

~~16.~~ Supplemental Cash Flow Information

Supplemental disclosures to the consolidated statements of cash flows are as follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	673	$	1,278	$	5,459	$	3,514
Income taxes	$	665,355	$	281,782	$	950,706	$	470,434

~~17.~~ 16.Stock Compensation

The Company accounts for awards of share-based compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment , (“SFAS No. 123(R)”) which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair values. Share-based compensation expense recorded ~~as it pertains~~amounted to ~~the Company’s restricted stock~~$58,533 and ~~employee stock purchase plans was $48,081 and $18,498~~$106,614 for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009, respectively as compared to $56,524 and $75,022 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively. ~~All stock options were fully vested as of January 1, 2009. Therefore, no share-based compensation expense was recorded during the period.~~

Stock Options

The Company currently maintains a 2001 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (“2001 Directors Plan”) which has not been approved by the Company’s stockholders. The plan is administered by the Board of Directors and exists to provide incentive to non-employee directors to serve on the Board and exert their best efforts. The 2001 Director’s Plan provides an option to purchase common stock in lieu of all or part of the retainer paid to Directors for their services. The Board of Directors fix the amount of the retainer fee for the coming year at least thirty days prior to beginning of plan year. At that time, each non-employee director may elect to receive stock options for all or part of the retainer fee to be provided. A total of 852,940 shares of common stock have been reserved for issuance pursuant to this plan at March 31, 2009. Subsequent to March 31, 2009, the Board of Directors made the decision to discontinue granting further stock options under this plan.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~In addition, the~~ Company currently maintains a 2005 Outside Directors Stock Option Plan (“2005 Outside Directors Plan”) which ~~has been~~was approved by the Company’s stockholders. During fiscal 2008, the Board of Directors made the decision to discontinue granting further stock options under this plan. The Company also maintained a 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan ~~and a 1995 Directors Stock Plan~~ which ~~both~~ expired in 2005, however, there are outstanding stock options remaining under ~~these two~~this expired ~~plans.~~plan.

A 2001 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan (“2001 Directors Plan”) was discontinued in May 2009 by the Board of Directors.

All past and future grants under the Company’s stock option plans were granted at exercise prices based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The outstanding options generally vested over periods ranging from zero to three years from the grant date and expired between 5 and 10 years after the grant date. No stock options were granted during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Table of Contents

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

Earnings (loss) before income taxes included ~~$10,968~~$7,312 and $18,280 of share-based compensation expense related to stock options, with associated tax benefits of ~~$3,800~~$2,600 and $6,398 for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2008. All stock options outstanding were fully vested as of January 1, 2009. Therefore, no share-based compensation expense was recorded during the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009.

The following table summarizes the Company’s activities with respect to its stock options for ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 as follows:

	Number of Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share			Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Number of Options	Weighted Average Exercise Price Per Share		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at December 31, 2008	278,125	$		2.29				278,125	$	2.29	2.69	$	113,250
Granted	—	—						—	—
Exercised	—	—						—	—
Forfeited	—	—						—	—
Outstanding at March 31, 2009	278,125	$	2.29		2.44	$	252,450
Exercisable at March 31, 2009	278,125	$	2.29		2.44	$	252,450

Outstanding at June 30, 2009								278,125	$	2.29	2.19	$	234,050
Exercisable at June 30, 2009								278,125	$	2.29	2.19	$	234,050

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total that would have been received by the option holders if all in-the-money options had been exercised on ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009.

No options were granted or exercised during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~

~~Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009:

	Options outstanding at March 31, 2009				Exercisable at March 31, 2009				Options Outstanding at June 30, 2009				Exercisable at June 30, 2009
Range of option exercise price	Number of options	Weighted average remaining contractual life	Weighted average exercise price per option		Number of options	Weighted average remaining contractual life	Weighted average exercise price per option		Number of options	Weighted average remaining contractual life	Weighted average exercise price per option		Number of options	Weighted average remaining contractual life	Weighted average exercise price per option
$0.62 to 0.63	160,000	3.08	$	0.62	160,000	3.08	$	0.62	160,000	2.83	$	0.62	160,000	2.83	$	0.62
4.25 to 4.75	118,125	1.57	4.55		118,125	1.57	4.55		118,125	1.32	4.55		118,125	1.32	4.55
$0.62 to 4.75	278,125	2.44	$	2.29	278,125	2.44	$	2.29	278,125	2.19	$	2.29	278,125	2.19	$	2.29

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009, all stock option awards were fully vested. Therefore, no unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock option awards remained at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009.

Table of Contents

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

Restricted Stock Plans

During 2005, the Company adopted and the stockholders approved, the 2005 Restricted Stock Plan. Under terms of the plan, the ~~compensation committee~~Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors selects which employees of the Company are to receive restricted stock awards and the terms of such awards. The total number of shares reserved for issuance under the plan was 250,000 shares. The plan expires in September 2010. During May 2008, the Company granted 54,000 shares to certain employees. A portion of the shares vested on January 1, 2009 with the remaining shares vesting on January 1, 2010 as the Company achieved certain earning thresholds, as defined within the restricted stock agreements. Additionally, during February of 2009, 64,491 shares of restricted stock were granted under this plan as partial payment under the Company’s Short-Term Incentive Plan. At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009, 131,509 shares remain available for issuance under the Plan.

~~On May 21,~~During 2008, the Company adopted and the stockholders approved the Ballantyne ~~of Omaha,~~Strong, Inc. Non-Employee ~~Director~~Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan ~~“Non-Employee Plan”~~(Non-Employee Plan) to replace the 2005 ~~Non-Employee Director~~Outside Directors’ Stock Option Plan. The total number of shares reserved for issuance under the ~~plan~~Non-Employee Plan was increased from 120,000 ~~shares.~~shares to 250,000 at the election of the shareholders at the 2009 Annual Shareholder Meeting. During May 2009, the Company granted 27,000 restricted shares under the Non-Employee Plan to the Board of Directors for future services rendered. These shares vest the day after the Company’s 2010 Annual Meeting. Additionally, in April 2009, 18,889 restricted shares were issued in conjunction with an agreement entered into with a member of the Company’s Board of Directors to provide consulting services. These restricted shares vest on April 1, 2010. During May 2008, the Company granted 15,000 restricted shares under the Non-Employee ~~Plan. The~~Plan to the Board of Directors for services rendered. These shares ~~vest~~vested on May 21, 2009 at the ~~day after the Company’s~~ 2009 Annual Shareholder Meeting. At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009, ~~105,000~~189,111 shares remain available for issuance under the Plan.

In connection with the restricted stock granted to certain employees and non-employee directors, the Company is accruing compensation expense based on the estimated number of shares expected to be issued utilizing the most current information available to the Company at the date of the financial statements. The Company estimates the fair value of restricted stock awards based upon the market price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awarded during 2008 and 2009 was approximately ~~$117,494~~$171,826 and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1513 months.

16The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the six months ended June 30, 2009:

	Number of Restricted Stock Shares		Weighted Average Grant Price Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2009	69,000		$	4.48
Granted	110,380
Shares vested	(44,000	)
Shares forfeited	—
Nonvested at June 30, 2009	135,380		$	2.36

As of June 30, 2008, total restricted stock awards outstanding amounted 69,000 shares.

Table of Contents

Ballantyne ~~of Omaha,~~Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

~~The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the three months ended March 31, 2009:~~

Number of
Restricted Stock
Shares

Weighted
Average
Grant Price
Fair Value

Nonvested at January 1, 2009

69,000

$
4.48

Granted

64,491

Shares vested

(29,000
)

Shares forfeited

—

Nonvested at March 31, 2009

104,491

$
2.72

~~No restricted stock awards were granted during the three months ended March 31, 2008.~~

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan, approved by the stockholders, provides for the purchase of shares of Ballantyne common stock by eligible employees at a per share purchase price equal to 85% of the fair market value of a share of Ballantyne common stock at either the beginning or end of the offering period, as defined, whichever is lower. Purchases are made through payroll deductions of up to 10% of each participating employee’s salary. The maximum number of shares that can be purchased by participants in any offering period is 2,000 shares. Additionally, the Plan has set certain limits, as defined, in regard to the number of shares that may be purchased by all eligible employees during an offering period. At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009, 104,104 shares of common stock remained available for issuance under the Plan. The Plan expires in October 2010.

At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009, the total unrecognized estimated compensation cost was ~~$12,553~~$7,306 which is expected to be recognized over a period of 74 months.

~~18.~~ 17.Related Party Transactions

The Company sold digital theatre projection equipment, in the normal course of business, to its joint venture, Digital Link II, LLC (“DL II”) of approximately $1.9 million during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009. DL II in turn provides the digital theatre projection equipment to third party customers under lease agreements. Revenue recognized by the Company on the sale transaction to DL II is limited by its 44.4% ownership in the joint venture which will be recognized upon sale of the equipment to the third parties. There were no sales during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2008.

~~19. Reduction in Staffing~~

~~During~~On April 1, 2009, the Company ~~made~~entered into a ~~reduction~~consulting agreement (the “agreement”) with Christopher Beach, a Director, to assist senior management on matters such as strategic planning, mergers and acquisitions and succession planning. The agreement is to provide services on a part-time basis for one year as an independent contractor in ~~overall staffing by nineteen persons, or approximately ten percent, as part~~exchange for a consulting fee of ~~the ongoing shift~~$85,000, paid in ~~the Company’s business from the manufacture~~equal amounts of ~~film projection equipment to the distribution of digital cinema projection equipment. The cost of the termination benefits, classified as general~~cash and ~~administrative expenses within the Condensed~~ Consolidated Statement of Operations, amounted to approximately $229,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2009, approximately $150,000 remain to be paid and are recorded in other accrued expenses within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

~~Table of Contents~~restricted stock (See Note 16 for further detail on restricted stock granted) plus out-of-pocket expenses.

~~Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~18.

~~Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~20.~~ Bonus Plans

During 2007, the Board of Directors approved the Short-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), to replace the Company’s previous Profit Sharing Plans. The Plan is an annual incentive program that provides certain officers and key employee’s bonuses in the form of cash or restricted stock or a combination of both if the Company achieves certain financial goals. Each payout is further subject to the achievement of certain individual goals, as defined. Total expense recorded in conjunction with the ~~2009~~ Plan amounted to approximately ~~$53,881~~$144,000 and $70,000 for the ~~period~~periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

19.Subsequent Events

The Company performed an evaluation of the Company’s activity and has concluded that as of August 7, 2009, the date these financial statements were issued, there are no material subsequent events requiring additional disclosure or recognition in these financial statements, as required by SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events.

20.Debt

The Company is party to a revolving credit facility (the "Original Credit Facility") with First National Bank of Omaha expiring August 30, 2009. ~~Total expense recorded in conjunction with~~The credit facility provides for borrowings up to the ~~2008 Plan~~lesser of $4.0 million or amounts determined by an asset-based lending formula, as defined. Borrowings available under the credit facility amounted to ~~$36,550 for~~$4.0 million at June 30, 2009. The Company pays interest on outstanding amounts equal to the ~~period ended March 31, 2008.~~Prime Rate plus 0.25% (3.5% at June 30, 2009) and pay a fee of 0.125% on the unused portion. The credit facility contains certain restrictions primarily related to restrictions on acquisitions and dividends. All of the Company’s personal property and certain stock in its subsidiaries secure the credit facility. No amounts are currently outstanding . The Company intends to obtain similar credit financing prior to the expiration of its current line of credit.

During 2008, the Company amended its Original Credit Facility to allow an interim extension of credit (the "Interim Credit Facility") in the amount of $10.4 million in addition to the $4.0 million allowed under the Original Credit Facility. Effective September 26, 2008, the Company entered into a Ninth Amendment to its Original Credit Facility to extend the maturity date of its interim extension of credit (the "Interim Credit Facility") to August 30, 2009 and to reduce the available borrowings to the lesser of $9.4 million or 80% of the par value of the auction-rate securities held in the pledged account. Now that the Company has liquidated all of the securities, no amounts currently remain available under this facility and the Company therefore does not intend to renew the credit facility after its expiration.

Table of Contents

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

21.Concentrations

The Company’s top ten customers accounted for approximately ~~61%~~55% of consolidated net revenues for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009. The top ten customers were primarily from the theatre segment. Trade accounts receivable from these customers represented approximately ~~60%~~63% of net consolidated receivables at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009. Sales to Vari International and Regal Cinemas each represented approximately ~~19%~~15% and ~~18% respectively,~~11% of consolidated sales. Additionally, receivables from Vari International and China Film Group represented approximately ~~23%~~15% and 27% of net consolidated receivables at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009. While the Company believes its relationships with such customers are stable, most arrangements are made by purchase order and are terminable at will by either party. A significant decrease or interruption in business from the Company’s significant customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company could also be adversely affected by such factors as changes in foreign currency rates and weak economic and political conditions in each of the countries in which the Company sells its products.

Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of accounts receivable. The Company sells product to a large number of customers in many different geographic regions. To minimize credit concentration risk, the Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition.

Through master reseller agreements with NEC, the Company distributes Starus DLP Cinema projectors to North and South America, Hong Kong, China and certain other areas of Asia. These agreements are non-exclusive distributorship agreements that are not perpetual and could be terminated with 90 day advance notice. NEC is the primary supplier of the digital products the Company distributes to the Theatre Industry. If the Company is unable to maintain its relationship with NEC or NEC is unable to ship products in a timely manner, the results would have a material adverse impact on its business, financial condition and operating results until the Company could find an alternative source of digital equipment to distribute. The principal raw materials and components used in the Company’s manufacturing processes include aluminum, reflectors, electronic subassemblies and sheet metal. The Company uses a single manufacturer for each of its intermittent movement components, reflectors, aluminum castings, lenses and xenon lamps. Although the Company has not to-date experienced a significant difficulty in obtaining these components, no assurance can be given that shortages will not arise in the future. The loss of any one or more of such contract manufacturers could have a short-term adverse effect on the Company until alternative manufacturing arrangements are secured.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~22.

~~Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~

~~Three Months Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~22.~~ Commitments and Contingencies

Ballantyne is currently a defendant in an asbestos case entitled Larry C. Stehman and Leila Stehman v. Asbestos Corporation, Limited and Ballantyne ~~of Omaha,~~Strong, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Strong International, Strong Electric Corporation and Century Projector Corporation, et al , filed December 8, 2006 in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco. While the Company believes that it has strong defenses and intends to defend the suit vigorously, ~~it is not possible at this time to predict~~ the ~~outcome~~ultimate resolution of ~~this case, or~~the matter could result in a loss in excess of the amount ~~of damages, if any, that a jury may award.~~accrued. It is possible that an adverse resolution of this case could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position. The case is scheduled for trial to commence on ~~May 26,~~August 24, 2009.

In conjunction with the purchase of Strong / MDI Screen Systems, Inc. ~~(formally Strong Digital Systems, Inc.)~~ in October 2007, a portion of the purchase price was restricted and placed in escrow to secure certain indemnification and other obligation contingencies. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009, $469,940 remains in escrow and are recorded in accrued expenses with the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Table of Contents

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

23.Business Segment Information

The presentation of segment information reflects the manner in which management organizes segments for making operating decisions and assessing performance.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009, the Company’s operations were conducted principally through two business segments: Theatre and Lighting. Theatre operations include the design, manufacture, assembly, sale and service of motion picture projectors, cinema screens, xenon lamphouses and power supplies. Theatre operations also include the sale and service of digital projection equipment and accessories, sound systems, xenon lamps and lenses. The lighting segment operations include the design, manufacture, assembly and sale of follow spotlights, stationary searchlights and computer operated lighting systems for the motion picture production, television, live entertainment, theme parks and architectural industries. The Company allocates resources to business segments and evaluates the performance of these segments based upon reported segment gross profit. However, certain key operations of a particular segment are tracked on the basis of operating profit. All intercompany sales are eliminated in consolidation.

1918

Table of Contents

Ballantyne ~~of Omaha,~~Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

Summary by Business Segments

	Three Months Ended March 31,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008
Net revenue
Theatre
Products	$	15,712,161		$	12,212,937		$	17,741,106		$	11,610,471		$	33,453,267		$	23,823,408
Services	796,525			766,761			1,087,104			753,853			1,883,629			1,520,614
Total theatre	16,508,686			12,979,698			18,828,210			12,364,324			35,336,896			25,344,022
Lighting	622,670			1,075,217			762,732			1,235,735			1,385,402			2,310,952
Other	12,097			142,257			11,765			43,045			23,862			185,302
Total revenue	$	17,143,453		$	14,197,172		$	19,602,707		$	13,643,104		$	36,746,160		$	27,840,276
Gross profit
Theatre
Products	$	3,134,520		$	2,215,100		$	3,892,843		$	2,326,435		$	7,027,363		$	4,541,535
Services	85,274			(265,614		)	57,047			(599,177		)	142,321			(864,791		)
Total theatre	3,219,794			1,949,486			3,949,890			1,727,258			7,169,684			3,676,744
Lighting	152,763			299,573			297,082			302,599			449,845			602,172
Other	6,513			60,822			5,621			19,998			12,134			80,820
Total gross profit	3,379,070			2,309,881			4,252,593			2,049,855			7,631,663			4,359,736
Selling and administrative expenses:
Selling	(668,399		)	(787,802		)	(767,791		)	(742,718		)	(1,436,190		)	(1,530,520		)
Administrative	(2,076,660		)	(2,025,296		)	(1,875,652		)	(1,634,972		)	(3,952,312		)	(3,660,268		)
Loss on disposal of long-lived assets, net	—			(1,285		)
Operating income	634,011			(504,502		)
Gain on sale of assets							—			258,170			—			258,170
Loss on disposal of fixed assets							(1,943		)	—			(1,943		)	(1,285		)
Operating income (loss)							1,607,207			(69,665		)	2,241,218			(574,167		)
Net interest income	33,017			137,651			20,076			120,187			53,093			257,838
Equity in loss of joint venture	(184,512		)	(112,991		)	(233,625		)	(184,909		)	(418,137		)	(297,900		)
Other income, net	181,237			26,792
Other income (expense), net							(68,333		)	19,882			112,904			46,674
Income (loss) before income taxes	$	663,753		$	(453,050	)	$	1,325,325		$	(114,505	)	$	1,989,078		$	(567,555	)

Expenditures on capital equipment
Theatre
Products	$	272,944		$	175,174		$	180,122		$	141,462		$	453,066		$	316,636
Services	—			114,319			—			46,778			—			161,097
Total theatre	272,944			289,493			180,122			188,240			453,066			477,733
Lighting	1,903			9,687			2,177			4,695			4,080			14,382

Total	$	274,847		$	299,180		$	182,299		$	192,935		$	457,146		$	492,115

Depreciation and amortization
Theatre
Products	$	377,035		$	555,171		$	393,983		$	555,667		$	771,018		$	1,110,838
Services	67,812			57,618			62,325			62,860			130,137			120,478
Total theatre	444,847			612,789			456,308			618,527			901,155			1,231,316
Lighting	14,519			16,986			7,532			17,299			22,051			34,285
Total	$	459,366		$	629,775		$	463,840		$	635,826		$	923,206		$	1,265,601

2019

Table of Contents

Ballantyne ~~of Omaha,~~Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

Summary by Business Segments (continued)

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009			2008		2009			2008
Loss on disposal of long-lived assets
Gain (loss) on disposal of fixed assets
Theatre
Products	$	—	$	1,285	$	(1,943	)	$	—	$	(1,943	)	$	(1,285	)
Services	—		—		—			—		—			—

Total theatre	—		1,285		(1,943		)	—		(1,943		)	(1,285		)
Lighting	—		—		—			—		—			—

Total	$	—	$	1,285	$	(1,943	)	$	—	$	(1,943	)	$	(1,285	)

	March 31,		December 31,		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008		2009		2008
Identifiable assets
Gain on sale of assets
Theatre
Products	$	51,035,375	$	45,842,050	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Services	1,409,354		1,345,836		—		—		—		—
Total theatre	52,444,729		47,187,886		—		—		—		—
Lighting	3,677,164		3,664,039		—		—		—		—
Other	42,502		261,013		—		258,170		—		258,170
Total identifiable assets	$	56,164,395	$	51,112,938
Total					$	—	$	258,170	$		$	258,170

	June 30,		December 31,
	2009		2008
Identifiable assets
Theatre
Products	$	52,571,836	$	45,842,050
Services	1,333,128		1,345,836
Total theatre	53,904,964		47,187,886
Lighting	4,272,420		3,664,039
Other	28,330		261,013
Total	$	58,205,714	$	51,112,938

Table of Contents

Ballantyne Strong, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Unaudited)

Summary by Geographical Area

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008		2009		2008
Net revenue
United States	$	9,982,041	$	10,170,981	$	10,461,526	$	8,714,578	$	20,443,567	$	18,885,559
Canada	661,369		493,553		896,961		291,117		1,558,297		784,670
China					4,264,805		1,153,917		5,396,441		2,249,447
Asia	1,779,304		1,777,785		108,154		716,184		730,001		1,067,831
Latin America	3,927,937		1,255,311
Mexico					2,244,256		1,100,464		5,387,331		2,091,285
South America					928,949		465,958		1,713,786		730,448
Europe	763,500		402,654		533,029		615,166		1,296,503		1,017,820
Other	29,302		96,888		165,027		585,720		220,234		1,013,216
Total	$	17,143,453	$	14,197,172	$	19,602,707	$	13,643,104	$	36,746,160	$	27,840,276

					June 30,		December 31,
	March 31, 2009		December 31, 2008		2009		2008
Identifiable assets
United States	$	45,696,640	$	42,508,283	$	43,723,683	$	42,508,283
Canada	6,147,372		2,893,914		6,868,076		2,893,914
Asia	4,320,383		5,710,741
China					7,613,955		5,710,741
Total	$	56,164,395	$	51,112,938	$	58,205,714	$	51,112,938

Net revenues by business segment are to unaffiliated customers. Identifiable assets by geographical area are based on location of facilities. Net sales by geographical area are based on destination of sales.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report. Management’s discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that involve risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to: quarterly fluctuations in results; customer demand for our products; the development of new technology for alternate means of motion picture presentation; domestic and international economic conditions; the achievement of lower costs and expenses; the continued availability of financing in the amounts and on the terms required to support our future business; credit concerns in the theatre exhibition industry; vendor and customer concentrations; and other risks detailed from time to time in our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings. Actual results may differ materially from management’s expectations. The risks included here are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report may include additional factors which could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.

Overview

We are a manufacturer, distributor and service provider for the theatre exhibition industry on a worldwide basis. We also design, develop, manufacture and distribute lighting systems to the worldwide entertainment lighting industry through our ~~Strong Entertainment~~ lighting segment.

We have two primary reportable core operating segments: theatre and lighting. Approximately 96% of sales for the ~~quarter~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 were from theatre products and approximately 4% were lighting products.

Results of Operations:

Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 Compared to the Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2008

Revenues

Net revenues during the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009 increased to ~~$17.1~~$19.6 million from ~~$14.2~~$13.6 million in 2008.

	Three Months Ended March 31,				Three Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
Theatre
Products	$	15,712,161	$	12,212,937	$	17,741,106	$	11,610,471
Services	796,525		766,761		1,087,104		753,853
Total theatre revenues	16,508,686		12,979,698		18,828,210		12,364,324
Lighting	622,670		1,075,217		762,732		1,235,735
Other	12,097		142,257		11,765		43,045
Total net revenues	$	17,143,453	$	14,197,172	$	19,602,707	$	13,643,104

Table of Contents

Theatre Segment

Sales of theatre products and services increased to ~~$16.5~~$18.8 million in 2009 from ~~$13.0~~$12.4 million in 2008.

Digital Product Sales

Sales of digital products rose to ~~$5.9~~$10.0 million during the quarter from ~~$4.4~~$2.6 million in 2008 as the ~~change~~theatre industry’s transition to digital projection ~~equipment~~ continued to accelerate during 2009. We believe that much of this demand is resulting from our customers wanting to show movies in 3D digital format as they believe that 3D movies result in higher ~~attendance and~~ ticket sales. The Hollywood studios have also increased the number of movies that can be shown in 3D. The full-scale rollout of digital cinema, however, has been slowed by the global credit environment as the purchase of digital equipment requires a significant amount of capital.

Film Product Sales

Sales of film projection equipment ~~increased~~decreased to ~~$3.2~~$1.4 million in 2009 from ~~$2.7~~$4.5 million a year-ago due to ~~higher demand outside of~~ the ~~United States. These higher export sales were offset by a slowdown in~~transition to digital coupled with significantly lower new theatre construction ~~in the United States~~ due to the current economic and credit market ~~conditions coupled with the expected transition to digital cinema projectors.~~conditions.

Sales of replacement parts rose slightly to ~~$1.9~~$1.8 million from $1.7 million ~~during 2008.~~a year-ago. We expect sales of film replacement parts to decrease over time but the decline is expected to be at a slower pace compared to the film projectors themselves as the equipment will require maintenance up to the point they are replaced by a digital unit. However, we are unsure how the used equipment market will impact our replacement part sales when film equipment is being replaced during the full digital cinema roll-out. We believe the higher sales during the quarter resulted from increased usage of film projectors due to higher box office receipts during the quarter.

Sales of xenon lamps declined slightly to $1.4 million compared to $1.5 million a year-ago while sales of film lenses decreased to ~~$41,000~~less than $0.1 million from ~~$0.5~~approximately $0.1 million ~~a year-ago as more than any other film product, used lenses have overtaken the market. Sales of xenon lamps declined to $1.5 million compared to $1.9 million a year-ago.~~in 2008.

Screen Product Sales

We generated sales of projector screens and related equipment of ~~$3.2~~$3.1 million in 2009 compared to ~~$1.0~~$1.1 million a year-ago due to higher demand for the special “silver” screens ~~needed~~required for certain 3D applications. As discussed earlier, this demand is resulting from our customers wanting to show certain movies in digital 3D and also more 3D movies being available from the Hollywood studios.

We sell screens for both digital cinema and film applications. In some instances, a screen can be used interchangeably with either a digital projector or a film projector. However, there are certain digital 3D applications such as the technology by Real D that require a special “silver” screen that we manufacture and which, as discussed earlier, are driving the growth of our screen ~~manufacturing company in Canada.~~product sales.

Service Revenues

Service revenues ~~were flat~~rose to $1.1 million in 2009 atcompared to $0.8 million ~~compared to~~ a year-ago. Revenues generated from servicing film equipment amounted to ~~$0.5~~$0.7 million in ~~both periods~~2009 compared to $0.6 million in 2008 while revenues generated from servicing digital equipment were ~~$0.3~~$0.4 million in ~~both periods.~~

~~Table of Contents~~2009 compared to $0.2 million.

Lighting Segment

Sales of lighting products fell to ~~$0.6~~$0.8 million during 2009 from ~~$1.1~~$1.2 million in 2008 due ~~to in large part~~ to lower demand for follow spotlights where sales fell to ~~$0.4~~$0.3 million from $0.7 million a year-ago. Spotlight sales were impacted by the effects of the troubled credit markets as these sales are in many instances dependent on the construction of stadiums and auditoriums around the world. It is unclear if other projects will be delayed or canceled during 2009 and beyond. ~~We also experienced a reduction in demand for~~Sales of replacement parts ~~which decreased to $0.1 million from~~were flat at $0.2 million ~~in 2008.~~for both the 2009 and 2008 periods, respectively. Sales of all other lighting products, including

Table of Contents

but not limited to, xenon lamps, skytrackers ~~britelights~~ and ~~nocturns~~britelights amounted to ~~$0.1~~$0.3 million in 2009 compared to ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million in 2008.

Export Revenues

Sales outside the United States (mainly theatre sales) rose to ~~$7.2~~$9.1 million in 2009 from ~~$4.0~~$4.9 million a year-ago due to increased sales into ~~Latin~~South America, ~~where sales~~Mexico and China. Sales into Mexico and South America combined rose to ~~$3.9~~$3.2 million from ~~$1.3~~$1.6 million a ~~year-ago.~~year-ago due primarily to increased demand to show movies in 3D format. Sales into China rose to $4.3 million from $1.2 million a year-ago again reflecting an increase in demand for digital equipment for 3D application. Export sales are sensitive to worldwide economic and political conditions that can lead to volatility. Additionally, certain areas of the world are more cost conscious than the U.S. market and there are instances where our products are priced higher than local manufacturers making it more difficult to generate sufficient profit to justify selling into these regions. Additionally, foreign exchange rates and excise taxes sometimes make it difficult to market our products overseas at reasonable selling prices.

Gross Profit

Consolidated gross profit increased to ~~$3.4~~$4.3 million in 2009 from ~~$2.3~~$2.1 million a year-ago and as a percent of total revenue increased to ~~19.7%~~21.7% from ~~16.3%~~15.0% in 2008. Gross profit in the theatre segment increased to ~~$3.2~~$3.9 million in 2009 from ~~$1.9~~$1.7 million in 2008 and as a percentage of theatre sales increased to ~~19.5%~~21.0% from ~~15.0%~~14.0% a year-ago. Our theatre margins were impacted primarily by profits from our screen manufacturing subsidiary, Strong / MDI Screen Systems, Inc., coupled with higher gross profit recognized within our theatre service subsidiary.

The gross profit in the lighting segment amounted to ~~$0.2~~$0.3 million or ~~24.5%~~38.9% as a percentage of lighting revenues in 2009 compared to $0.3 million or ~~27.9%~~24.5% as a percentage of lighting revenues in ~~2008 as profit was impacted by lower production resulting~~2008. The margin increase resulted primarily from profits from a long-term construction project currently in ~~higher manufacturing costs per unit.~~process which is being recognized based on the percentage of completion.

Selling Expenses

Selling expenses ~~declined~~rose to ~~$0.7~~$0.8 million in 2009 compared to ~~$0.8~~$0.7 million in 2008, ~~and~~but as a percent of total revenue declined to 3.9% from ~~5.5%~~5.4% a year-ago ~~due to lower tradeshow, advertising, travel and commission~~as higher revenues are covering fixed costs.

Administrative Expenses

Administrative costs rose to ~~$2.1~~$1.9 million in 2009 from ~~$2.0~~$1.6 million in 2008 but as a percent of total revenue decreased to ~~12.1%~~9.6% in 2009 from ~~14.3%~~12.0% in 2008 as the higher revenues during the quarter covered ~~more~~stable fixed costs. ~~Expenses during the quarter were impacted by the~~The increase in costs ~~of certain termination benefits amounting~~primarily result from higher insurance costs due to ~~$0.2 million during the quarter.~~increased business volume, higher stock compensation expenses coupled with costs from our office in Beijing, China which was not open a year-ago.

Other Financial Items

Our results for 2009 reflect a loss of approximately $234,000 pertaining to our 44.4% share of the equity in the loss from our joint venture with Real D, Digital Link II, LLC. This loss compares to approximately $185,000 a year-ago and was higher due to more depreciation and interest costs resulting from additional deployments compared to the second quarter of 2008.

Net interest income declined to $0.02 million from approximately $0.1 million a year-ago as our investment balances declined due to the redemption of all of our outstanding auction-rate securities coupled with significantly lower interest rates due to the current economic environment.

We recorded income tax expense of approximately $0.4 million in 2009 compared to approximately $5,600 in 2008. The effective tax rate (calculated as a ratio of income tax benefit (expense) to pretax income (loss), inclusive of equity method investment losses) was approximately 29.5% for 2009. This compares to 4.9% a year-ago.

Table of Contents

The effective rate change from year to year resulted from differing foreign and U.S. tax rates applied to respective pre-tax income (loss) amounts by tax jurisdiction.

For the reasons outlined herein, we experienced net income of $0.9 million and basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.07 in 2009 compared to a net loss of $0.1 million and basic and diluted loss per share of $0.01 a year-ago.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

Revenues

Net revenues during the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased to $36.7 million from $27.8 million in 2008.

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009		2008
Theatre
Products	$	33,453,267	$	23,823,408
Services	1,883,629		1,520,614
Total theatre revenues	35,336,896		25,344,022
Lighting	1,385,402		2,310,952
Other	23,862		185,302
Total net revenues	$	36,746,160	$	27,840,276

Theatre Segment

Sales of theatre products and services increased to $35.3 million in 2009 from $25.3 million in 2008.

Digital Product Sales

Sales of digital products rose to $15.9 million from $7.1 million in 2008 as the theatre industry transition to digital projection accelerated during 2009. We believe that much of this increased demand is a result of our customers wanting to show movies in 3D digital format as they believe that 3D movies result in higher ticket sales. The Hollywood studios have also increased the number of movies that can be shown in 3D. The full-scale rollout of digital cinema, however, has been slowed by the global credit environment as the purchase of digital equipment requires a significant amount of capital.

Film Product Sales

Sales of film projection equipment decreased to $4.6 million in 2009 from $8.0 million a year-ago due to a combination of the digital rollout coupled with significantly lower new theatre construction due to the current economic and credit market conditions.

Sales of replacement parts rose to $3.7 million from $3.3 million a year-ago. We expect sales of film replacement parts to decrease over time but the decline is expected to be at a slower pace compared to the film projectors themselves as the equipment will require maintenance up to the point they are replaced by a digital unit. However, we are unsure how the used equipment market will impact our replacement part sales when film equipment is being replaced during the digital cinema roll-out. We believe the higher sales during the first half of the year resulted from increased usage of film projectors due to higher box office receipts.

Sales of xenon lamps declined slightly to $2.9 million compared to $3.0 million a year-ago. Sales of film lenses decreased to $0.1 million from $0.2 million in 2008.

Table of Contents

Screen Product Sales

We generated sales of projector screens and related equipment of $6.3 million in 2009 compared to $2.2 million a year-ago due to higher demand for the special “silver” screens needed for certain 3D applications. As discussed earlier, this demand is resulting from our customers wanting to show certain movies in digital 3D and also more 3D movies being available from the Hollywood studios.

We sell screens for both digital cinema and film applications. In some instances, a screen can be used interchangeably with either a digital projector or a film projector. However, there are certain digital 3D applications such as the technology by Real D that require a special “silver” screens that we manufacture and which, as discussed earlier, are driving the growth of our screen product sales.

Service Revenues

Service revenues rose to $1.9 million in 2009 compared to $1.5 million a year-ago. Revenues generated from servicing film equipment amounted to $1.3 million in 2009 compared to $1.1 million in 2008 while revenues generated from servicing digital equipment were $0.6 million in 2009 compared to $0.4 million a year-ago.

Lighting Segment

Sales of lighting products fell to $1.4 million from $2.3 million a year-ago due to in large part to lower demand for follow spotlights where sales fell to $0.7 million from $1.4 million a year-ago. Spotlight sales were impacted by the effects of the troubled credit markets as these sales are in many instances dependent on the construction of stadiums and auditoriums around the world. It is unclear if other projects will be delayed or canceled during 2009 and beyond. Sales of replacement parts declined to $0.3 million during 2009 from $0.4 million in 2008. Sales of all other lighting products, including but not limited to, xenon lamps, skytrackers and britelights amounted to $0.4 million in 2009 compared to $0.5 million in 2008. The decrease primarily resulted from lower sales of Sky-Tracker products which have been severely impacted by economic conditions.

Export Revenues

Sales outside the United States (mainly theatre sales) rose to $16.3 million in 2009 from $9.0 million a year-ago due to increased sales into South America, Mexico and China. Sales into South America and Mexico combined rose to $7.1 million from $2.8 million a year-ago due primarily to increased demand for digital products due to increased demand to show movies in 3D format. Sales into China rose to $5.4 million from $2.4 million a year-ago again reflecting an increase in demand for digital equipment for 3D application. Export sales are sensitive to worldwide economic and political conditions that can lead to volatility. Additionally, certain areas of the world are more cost conscious than the U.S. market and there are instances where our products are priced higher than local manufacturers making it more difficult to generate sufficient profit to justify selling into these regions. Additionally, foreign exchange rates and excise taxes sometimes make it difficult to market our products overseas at reasonable selling prices.

Gross Profit

Consolidated gross profit increased to $7.6 million in 2009 from $4.4 million a year-ago and as a percent of total revenue increased to 20.8% from 15.7% in 2008. Gross profit in the theatre segment increased to $7.2 million in 2009 from $3.7 million in 2008 and as a percentage of theatre sales increased to 20.3% from 14.5 % a year-ago. Our theatre margins were impacted primarily by profits from our screen manufacturing subsidiary, Strong / MDI Screen Systems, Inc., coupled with higher gross profit recognized within our theatre service subsidiary.

The gross profit in the lighting segment amounted to $0.5 million or 32.5% as a percentage of lighting revenues in 2009 compared to $0.6 million or 26.1% as a percentage of lighting revenues in 2008. The margin increase resulted from profits from a long-term construction project currently in process which is being recognized based on the percentage of completion.

Table of Contents

Selling Expenses

Selling expenses fell to $1.4 million in 2009 from $1.5 million a year-ago, and as a percent of total revenue declined to 3.9% from 5.5% a year-ago as we incurred fewer personnel costs during 2009.

Administrative Expenses

Administrative costs rose to $4.0 million from $3.7 million a year-ago but as a percent of total revenue decreased to 10.8% in 2009 from 13.1% in 2008 as the higher revenues during the year covered certain fixed expenses. The increase in expenses primarily resulted from a $0.2 million severance charge during the first quarter. We also experienced more insurance costs due to higher business volume coupled with costs pertaining to our office in Beijing, China which was not open a year-ago.

Other Financial Items

Our results for 2009 reflect a loss of $0.4 million pertaining to our 44.4% share of the equity in the loss from our joint venture with Real D, Digital Link II, LLC. This loss compares to ~~$0.1~~$0.3 million a year-ago and was higher due to more depreciation and interest costs resulting from additional deployments.

~~We recorded net~~Net interest income ofdeclined to less than $0.1 million from approximately ~~$33,000 during 2009 compared to approximately $138,000~~$0.3 million a year-ago as our investment balances ~~are lower~~declined due to the redemption of all of our outstanding auction-rate securities coupled with significantly lower interest rates due to the current economic environment.

~~Table of Contents~~

Other income amounted to $0.2 million in 2009 compared to approximately $27,000 in 2008. The results reflect the impact of transaction gains arising from foreign exchange fluctuations during 2009 due to the U.S. dollar increasing versus the Canadian dollar.

We recorded income tax expense of approximately ~~$0.1~~$0.5 million in 2009 compared to an income tax benefit of $0.2 million in 2008. The effective tax rate (calculated as a ratio of income tax benefit (expense) to pretax income (loss), inclusive of equity method investment ~~earnings (losses))~~losses) was approximately ~~18.4%~~25.8% for 2009 ~~which reflects~~compared to 34.0% a ~~combination of taxable~~year-ago. The effective tax rate change from year to year resulted from differing foreign and U.S. tax rates applied to respective pre-tax income ~~recorded for foreign purposes and a taxable loss recorded for U.S. purposes in addition to the benefit from the impact of tax-free interest income.~~(loss) amounts by tax jurisdiction.

For the reasons outlined herein, we ~~experienced~~generated net income of ~~$0.5~~$1.5 million ~~and basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.04 in 2009~~ compared to a net loss of ~~$0.3~~$0.4 million ~~and~~a year-ago. We generated basic ~~and~~earnings per share of $0.11 during 2009 compared to a loss of $0.03 in 2008. Diluted earnings per share amounted to $0.10 in 2009 compared to a diluted loss per share of ~~$0.02 a year-ago.~~$0.03 in 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During the past several years, we have met our working capital and capital resource needs from either our operating or investing cash flows or a combination of both. We ended the ~~first~~second quarter with total cash and cash equivalents of ~~$11.3 million. Additionally, we have approximately $8.8~~$21.2 million compared to $11.4 million at December 31, 2008. The increase was primarily due to the liquidation of ~~long-term~~all of our investments in auction-rate securities ~~(net of~~at par during the quarter which previously had been recorded as a $0.8 million unrealized loss) which are classified as available-for-sale securities. The ARS investments are held within closed-end funds which are AAA rated and fully collateralized at a minimum 200% net asset to fund ratio. These investments are intended to provide liquidity via an auction process that resets the applicable interest rate every seven days allowing investors to either roll over their holdings or gain immediate liquidity by selling such investments at par.

long-term investment. During 2008, the market for the Company’s investments in auction-rate securities began experiencing a liquidity issue when the securities came up for auction due to an imbalance of buyers and sellers for the securities. These conditions ~~continue~~continued to persist in ~~2009. The Company cannot predict how long~~2009, however, during the ~~current imbalance in the auction market will continue. As a result, for a period of time, the Company may be unable~~quarter we were able to liquidate the ~~auction rate securities held until a successful auction occurs or~~remaining $9.4 million of the securities ~~are redeemed by the issuer of the investments. Based on the continued unsuccessful auctions~~though a financial institution. We had previously been able to liquidate $0.6 million of these ~~investments, the investment~~ securities have been reclassified to noncurrent assets within the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. As of March 31, 2009, the Company has liquidated, at par, $3,425,000 of its auction rate securities of which $50,000 were sold through the normal auction process with the remaining amounts redeemed by the fund itselffrom other means since the beginning of the ~~liquidity issue. Of these amounts $450,000 were received during the three months ended March 31, 2009.~~

Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”) which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements with respect to financial assets and liabilities. Under SFAS 157, fair value is the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability between market participants as of the measurement date. Fair value measurements assume the asset or liability is exchanged in an orderly manner; the exchange is in the principal market for that asset or liability (or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists); and the market participants are independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange.

~~Level 1:~~	~~Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.~~
~~Level 2:~~	~~Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.~~
~~Level 3:~~	Unobservable inputs that are used in the measurement of assets and liabilities. Unobservable inputs require management to make certain projections and assumptions about the information that would be used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability.

~~Table of Contents~~

Due to the inability to trade all of our investments in auction-rate securities in the current market, we continue to earn interest on our investments at the maximum contractual default rate. The weighted average maximum contractual default rate being earned as of March 31, 2009 was 1.08%. Because of the inability to trade these investments, a readily determinable fair value using market observables (Level 1) does not exist. Therefore, in accordance with SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurement,” the Company, via the retention of the valuation firm Gifford Fong Associates, used a cash flow model to determine the estimated fair value of our auction-rate securities (Level 3). The assumptions used in preparing this model included, among other items, estimates for interest rates, default and recovery rates, illiquidity risk and an estimate for the timing of full redemption of the securities and are summarized below:

· ~~Interest rate indices—LIBOR curve and commercial paper rates obtained.~~

· ~~Default and recovery rates—the default rate is estimated using a credit spread (discount margin) over the risk free rate curve obtained.~~

· ~~Illiquidity risk—in a distressed market, investors may not be able to find willing buyers, hence reduced liquidity.~~

· ~~Estimated weighted average coupon—the yield, considered to be the weighted average cost of capital (WACC), is related to the financial strength and outlook of each fund.~~

~~Based on the valuations obtained, an impairment of approximately $0.8 million was recorded.~~

~~In accordance with SFAS No. 115,~~ ~~Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,~~ impairment in the fair value of the investment securities should be classified as “temporary” or “other than temporary.” The differentiating factors between a temporary and an other-than temporary impairment are primarily the length of the time and the extent to which the market value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer and the intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value. Based on this guidance and the guidance in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 5M we determined the impairment should be classified as “temporary” and will be recorded as an unrealized loss which is excluded from earnings and recorded in the other comprehensive income (loss) component of stockholders’ equity for the following reasons:

· The investments are in closed-end funds that are AAA rated and fully collateralized. Further, we are a preferred shareholder in all the funds. The ratings and collateralization is confirmed every seven days at each auction regardless of whether the auction fails or succeeds. Therefore, the financial condition of the issuer is strong and management believes the impairment is more a result of the illiquidity in the market and not the creditworthiness of the issuers.

· The amount of the temporary impairment recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was only 7.9% of the carrying value compared to 11.4% as of December 31, 2008. We view this evidence as corroborative that the underlying credit worthiness of the securities were not impaired.

· We believe that as of March 31, 2009, there is sufficient capital to run our business with our cash position and our ability to draw on our credit facilities such that the current lack of liquidity in the auction rate market will not have a material impact on our ability to fund our operations or interfere with our external growth plans. We continue to receive interest at a maximum default rate on the auction-rate securities and believe, due to our ability to fund our operations while a current lack of liquidity exists in the auction-rate market securities and the attributes of the auction-rate securities held, the full value of the auction-rate securities held will be realized upon settlement in the future. Therefore, it is management’s intent to hold these securities for a sufficient amount of time to allow for recovery in the market value to occur.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Additionally, all of the Company’s ARS investments were purchased, via an intermediary brokerage firm, with a brokerage firm that has reached settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission.~~

However, if market conditions would deteriorate further and the anticipated recovery in market values does not occur or the settlement agreement with the SEC is modified we may be required to record additional unrealized losses in other comprehensive income (loss) or an other-than-temporary impairment charge which could also impact our results of operations or liquidity and capital resources in future periods.fiscal year.

We are a party to a revolving credit facility (the “Original Credit Facility”) with First National Bank of Omaha expiring August 30, 2009. The credit facility provides for borrowings up to the lesser of $4.0 million or amounts determined by an asset-based lending formula, as defined. Borrowings available under the credit facility amounted to $4.0 million at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009. We pay interest on outstanding amounts equal to the Prime Rate plus 0.25% ~~(3.50%~~(3.5% at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009) and pay a fee of 0.125% on the unused portion. The credit facility contains certain restrictions primarily related to restrictions on acquisitions and dividends. All of our personal property and certain stock in our subsidiaries secure the credit facility. No amounts are currently outstanding . The Company intends to obtain similar credit financing prior to the expiration of its current line of credit.

Table of Contents

During 2008, the Company amended its Original Credit Facility to allow an interim extension of credit (the “Interim Credit Facility”) in the amount of $10.4 million in addition to the $4.0 million allowed under the Original Credit Facility. Effective September 26, 2008, the Company entered into a Ninth Amendment to its Original Credit Facility to extend the maturity date of its interim extension of credit (the “Interim Credit Facility”) to August 30, 2009 and to reduce the available borrowings to the lesser of $9.4 million or 80% of the par value of the ~~investments~~auction-rate securities held in the pledged ~~account ($7.7 million as~~account. Now that we have liquidated all of March 31, 2009). The Interim Credit Facility is evidenced by a Promissory Note with an interest rate set at a floating rate set to after-tax interest income received on certain investment securities. The credit facilities contain certain restrictions primarily related to restrictions on acquisitions and dividends. All of our personal property and certain stock in our subsidiaries secure the ~~credit facilities. Total borrowing~~securities, no amounts currently remain available under this facility and the ~~Original and Interim Credit facilities amounted to $11.7 million. No amounts are currently outstanding under either of the credit facilities. The~~ Company ~~intends~~therefore does not intend to renew the credit ~~facilities prior to their~~facility after its expiration.

Net cash ~~used in~~generated from operating activities amounted to ~~$0.2~~$0.1 million in 2009 compared to net cash ~~provided~~used by operating activities of ~~$0.7~~$0.4 million in 2008. The ~~results for~~improved cash flow in 2009 ~~reflect an increase~~was the result of higher earnings offset by higher working capital needs. Accounts receivable turnover in ~~accounts receivable balances of $5.1 million during~~ the first ~~quarter~~half of 2009 was lower due to the timing of ~~cash receipts. Accounts receivable~~sales occurring during the second quarter which resulted in balances ~~are expected to decrease in subsequent quarters. The $0.7~~increasing $3.1 million during 2009. In addition, the Company recorded $3.6 million of ~~cash flow from operating activities for~~unbilled revenue during the ~~three months ended March 31, 2008 resulted primarily from turning a significant amount~~quarter. Inventory levels fell $0.3 million during 2009 while accounts payable balances increased $3.4 million which offset some of ~~our consignment inventory into cash resulting in a net inflow~~the impact of ~~cash of $1.8 million from this inventory.~~higher accounts receivable levels.

Net cash provided by investing activities amounted to ~~$0.2~~$9.6 million in 2009 compared to ~~$0.4~~$0.9 million ~~used~~ in 2008. During 2009 we purchased ~~$0.3~~$0.5 million of capital equipment and liquidated at par, approximately ~~$0.5~~$10.0 million of our auction-rate securities. $9.4 million of the proceeds resulted from the sale of such securities to a financial institution whom we have a banking relationship, while the remaining amounts were redeemed through other means. Investing activities during 2008 ~~primarily~~ consisted of capital ~~expenditures.~~expenditures of $0.5 million. In addition we received $0.3 million of proceeds from the sale of our coater and marinade product line and liquidated, at par, $1.2 million of our auction-rate securities during 2008.

Net cash provided by financing activities amounted to $0.2 million in 2008 resulting from transactions in our stock plans. We did not ~~engage in~~experience any financing activities during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31, 2009 and 2008.~~June 30, 2009.

Transactions with Related and Certain Other Parties

The Company sold digital theatre projection equipment, in the normal course of business, to its joint venture, Digital Link II, LLC (“DL II”) ~~for~~of approximately ~~$1.9~~$1.8 million ~~for~~during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009. DL II in turn provides the digital theatre projection equipment to third party customers under ~~operating~~ lease agreements. Revenue recognized by the Company on the sale transaction to DL II is limited by its 44.4% ownership in the joint venture which will be recognized upon sale of the equipment to the third parties. There were no sales during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2008.

~~Table of Contents~~

Financial Instruments and Credit Risk Concentrations

The Company’s top ten customers accounted for approximately ~~61%~~55% of 2009 consolidated net revenues. The top ten customers were primarily from the theatre segment. Trade accounts receivable from these customers represented approximately ~~60%~~63% of net consolidated receivables at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009. Sales to Vari International and Regal Cinemas represented approximately ~~19%~~15% and ~~18%~~11%, respectively, of consolidated sales. Additionally, receivables from China Film Group and Vari International represented approximately ~~23%~~27% and 15%, respectively, of net consolidated receivables at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009. While the Company believes its relationships with such customers are stable, most arrangements are made by purchase order and are terminable at will by either party. A significant decrease or interruption in business from the Company’s significant customers could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company could also be adversely affected by such factors as changes in foreign currency rates and weak economic and political conditions in each of the countries in which the Company sells its products.

Table of Contents

NEC or NEC is unable to supply products in a timely manner, the results would have a material adverse impact on its business, financial condition and operating results until the Company could find an alternative source of digital equipment to distribute. The principal raw materials and components used in the Company’s manufacturing processes include aluminum, reflectors, electronic subassemblies and sheet metal. The Company uses a single manufacturer for each of its intermittent movement components, reflectors, aluminum castings, lenses and xenon lamps. Although the Company has not to-date experienced a significant difficulty in obtaining these components, no assurance can be given that shortages will not arise in the future. The loss of any one or more of such contract manufacturers could have a short-term adverse effect on the Company until alternative manufacturing arrangements are secured.

Financial instruments that potentially expose us to a concentration of credit risk principally consist of ~~investments in auction-rate securities and~~ accounts receivable. We sell product to a large number of customers in many different geographic regions. To minimize credit concentration risk, we perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition or use letters of credit.

Hedging and Trading Activities

The Company’s primary exposure to foreign currency fluctuations pertains to its subsidiary in Canada. In certain instances, the Company may enter into a foreign exchange contract to manage a portion of this risk. For the period ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009, the Company had recorded an immaterial amount of unrealized loss associated with these open contracts in its consolidated statement of operations.

We do not have any trading activities that include non-exchange traded contracts at fair value.

~~Table of Contents~~

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

Our off balance sheet arrangements consist principally of leasing various assets under operating leases. The future estimated payments under these arrangements are summarized below along with our other contractual obligations:

									Payments Due by Period
	Payments Due by Period										Remaining
			Remaining						Total		In 2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	Thereafter
Contractual Obligations	Total		In 2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	Thereafter
Non-competition agreement	75,000		25,000	—	50,000	—	—	—	75,000		25,000	—	50,000	—	—	—
Postretirement benefits	203,499		18,687	17,551	18,605	19,575	20,551	108,530	200,459		15,647	17,551	18,605	19,575	20,551	108,530
Operating leases	911,026		202,150	266,197	257,499	185,180	—	—	866,552		136,842	273,685	264,987	191,038	—	—
Contractual cash obligations	$	1,189,525	245,837	283,748	326,104	204,755	20,551	108,530	$	1,142,011	177,489	291,236	333,592	210,613	20,551	108,530

We have a contractual obligation to pay up to $150,000 to High End Systems, Inc. (“High End”) of which $100,000 is expected to be paid in the next twelve months and has been reclassified to short-term liabilities. Payment is contingent on satisfaction of certain future sales of the product line purchased as part of the business from High End. In addition, we have accrued approximately $0.1 million for the ~~estimated underpayment of~~uncertain income ~~taxes we are obligated to pay.~~tax positions. The accrual is primarily related to state tax matters. ~~There were no other contractual obligations other than inventory and property, plant and equipment purchases in the ordinary course of business.~~

During 2009, the Company provided ~~a guarantee~~guarantees to ~~a note~~notes entered into by the LLC to finance digital projection equipment deployed in the normal course of business. The ~~loan provides~~loans provided for borrowings of approximately ~~$0.3~~$1.3 million and ~~bears~~bear interest at a rate of 7.2% per annum. The Company’s portion of the guarantee of the ~~note is~~notes at the time the notes were entered into was limited to its 44.4% ownership percentage, which ~~amounts~~amounted to approximately ~~$0.1~~$0.6 million. RealD, who holds a membership interest of 55.6% in the joint venture, ~~has~~ provided a guarantee for the remainder of the note outstanding, which ~~amounts~~amounted to approximately ~~$0.2 million.~~$0.7 million at the time the note was entered into. During 2008, wethe Company provided ~~a guarantee~~guarantees to notes entered into by ~~DL II~~the LLC to finance digital projection equipment deployed in the normal course of business. The loans ~~provide~~provided for borrowings of approximately $0.7 million and $2.5 million, respectively and bear interest at rates of 7.2% and 7.0% per annum. ~~Our~~The Company’s portion of the guarantee of the notes isat the time the notes were entered into was limited to ~~our~~its 44.4% ownership percentage, which amounts to approximately $1.4 million. RealD, who holds a membership interest of 55.6% in the joint venture, ~~has~~ provided a guarantee for the remainder of the notes outstanding, which amounted to

Table of Contents

approximately $1.8 million at the time the note was entered into. As of June 30, 2009, the Company’s guarantee on the remaining balance of the notes outstanding was approximately $1.6 million. ~~We have~~The Company has recorded a liability for the fair value of the ~~obligation~~obligations undertaken by issuing the guarantees which amounted to approximately $0.07 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009. The guarantees will expire by the end of 2011. Under the terms of the guarantees, the Company and RealD would be required to fulfill the guarantees should the joint venture be in default of its loan or contract terms.

There were no other contractual obligations other than inventory and property, plant and equipment purchases in the ordinary course of business.

Seasonality

Generally, our business exhibits a moderate level of seasonality as sales of theatre products typically increase during the third and fourth quarters. We believe that such increased sales reflect seasonal increases in the construction of new motion picture screens in anticipation of the holiday movie season.

~~Table of Contents~~

Legal

Inflation

We believe that the relatively moderate rates of inflation in recent years have not had a significant impact on our net revenues or profitability. ~~We did experience higher than normal prices on certain raw materials during the past year coupled with higher freight costs as freight companies passed on a portion of higher gas and oil costs.~~ Historically, we have been able to offset any inflationary effects by either increasing prices or improving cost efficiencies.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

In preparing the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; management must make a variety of decisions which impact the reported amounts and the related disclosures. These decisions include the selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to base accounting estimates. In making these decisions, management applies its judgment based on its understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances and the Company’s historical experience.

Our accounting policies and estimates that are most critical to the presentation of the Company’s results of operations and financial condition, and which require the greatest use of judgments and estimates by management, are designated as our critical accounting policies. See further discussion of the Company’s critical accounting policies under Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the Company’s year ended December 31, 2008. We periodically re-evaluate and adjust our critical accounting policies as circumstances change. There were no significant changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS No. 162”)”~~. SFAS~~.SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). SFAS No. 162 will be effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s related amendments to remove the GAAP hierarchy from

Table of Contents

auditing standards. The Company does not believe the adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In ~~February~~June 2009, the FASB issued ~~FSP FAS 115-a, FAS 124-a, and EITF 99-20-b, “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.~~SFAS No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R).” This statement ~~amends FASB No. 115 and No. 124 and EITF Issue No. 99-20~~requires reporting entities to ~~change~~evaluate former QSPE’s for consolidation, changes to approach to determining a VIE’s primary beneficiary from a quantitative assessment to a qualitative assessment designed to identify a controlling financial interest. This statement is effective as of the ~~amount~~beginning of ~~other-than-temporary impairment~~a Company’s first fiscal year that ~~is recognized in earnings when there are credit losses on a debt security for which management~~begins after November 15, 2009. The Company does not ~~intend to sell~~believe the adoption will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS No. 168”).” The Codification under SFAS No. 168 will become the exclusive authoritative reference for ~~which it is more likely than not that the entity will not have to sell prior to recovery of the noncredit impairment. The provisions of this statement are effective~~nongovernmental U.S. GAAP for use in financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after ~~June15,~~September 15, 2009. ~~As of March 31, 2009, the~~The Company does not believe ~~that FSP FAS 115-a, FAS 124-a, and EITF 99-20-b~~the adoption will have a material ~~effect~~impact on its consolidated financial statements.

~~Table of Contents~~

In ~~February~~June 2009, the FASB issued ~~FSP FAS 115-e, “Determining when a Market for~~EITF 08-1, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” This issue revises the current accounting treatment under EITF 00-21to specifically address how to determine whether an ~~Asset~~arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting. This issue is applicable to revenue arrangements entered into or Liability is Active or Inactive and determining when a Transaction is distressed.” This statement is expected to reaffirm the exit price objective of fair value measurements and to provide guidance on inactive markets and distressed transactions.materially during Company’s first fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2010. The ~~provisions of FSP FAS No. 115-e are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after June15, 2009. As of March 31, 2009, the~~ Company does not believe ~~that FSP FAS No. 115-e~~the adoption will have a material ~~effect~~impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The principal market risks affecting us are exposure to interest rates ~~auction-rate securities~~ and foreign currency exchange rates. We market our products throughout the United States and the world. As a result, we could be adversely affected by such factors as changes in foreign currency rates and weak economic conditions. As a majority of our sales are currently denominated in U.S. dollars, a strengthening of the dollar can and sometimes has made our products less competitive in foreign markets.

Interest Rates—We have variable interest rate credit facilities. However, we have no outstanding balances as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2009. If we would borrow up to the maximum amount available under these facilities, a one percent increase in the interest rate would increase interest expense by a maximum of ~~$0.1~~$0.04 million per annum. Interest rate risks from our other interest-related accounts such as our postretirement obligations are not deemed significant.

Auction-Rate Securities—We have also evaluated our exposure to changes in the market price of our auction-rate securities as a result of the current liquidity in the auction-rate market. A one percent decrease in the average market price of our auction-rate securities would have an effect on comprehensive income (loss) of approximately $0.1 million.

Foreign Exchange—Exposures to transactions denominated in a currency other than the entity’s functional currency are primarily related to our Canadian subsidiary. From time to time, as market conditions indicate, we will enter into foreign currency contracts to manage the risks associated with forecasted transactions. A portion of our cash in the Canadian subsidiary is denominated in foreign currencies, where fluctuations in exchange rates will impact our cash balances in U.S. dollar terms. A hypothetical 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar would impact our reported cash balance by less than $0.1 million in 2009.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective at ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (as amended) is (1) accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures and (2) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter for the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, such internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

A review of the Company’s current litigation is disclosed in Note 22 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Item IA, “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 includes a detailed discussion of the Company’s risk factors. There have been no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 20, 2009. There were issued and outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting 14,093,019 shares of common stock. There were present in person or by proxy, holders of record of shares of common stock representing 11,645,884 shares. The following matters were voted upon:

Proposal No. 1- Election of Directors:

The election of seven nominees for the Board of Directors who will serve for a one-year term was voted on by the stockholders. Based on the voting results, the following directors were elected. The Inspector of Elections certified the following vote tabulations:

	For	Withheld

Alvin Abramson	11,385,484	260,400
Christopher E. Beach	7,802,775	3,843,109
John Wilmers	11,500,744	145,140
Marc E. LeBaron	11,388,310	257,574
Mark D. Hasebroock	11,378,710	267,174
Steven J. Schuster	11,473,452	172,432
William F. Welsh II	10,381,992	1,263,892

Proposal No. 2- To adopt an amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to change the name of the Company from Ballantyne of Omaha, Inc. to Ballantyne Strong, Inc.

The Inspector of Elections certified the following vote tabulations:

For		Against		Abstain		Broker Non-Vote
11,428,712		200,182		16,998		5,629,869

The proposal passed with more than a majority of the issued and outstanding shares being voted “For” the proposal.

Proposal No. 3- To adopt an amendment to the 2008 Non-Employee Directors’ Restricted Stock Plan increasing the number of shares available under the Plan from 120,000 to 250,000 shares.

The Inspector of Elections certified the following vote tabulations:

For		Against		Abstain		Broker Non-Vote
7,881,355		573,516		8,279		5,629,869

The proposal passed with more than a majority of the issued and outstanding shares being voted “For” the proposal.

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

See the Exhibit Index on page ~~34.~~35.

3233

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

~~BALLANTYNE OF OMAHA,~~
BALLANTYNE STRONG, INC.

By:
/s/ JOHN WILMERS

By:
/s/ KEVIN HERRMANN

John Wilmers, President,
Kevin Herrmann, Secretary/Treasurer and
Chief Executive Officer, and Director

~~Kevin Herrmann, Secretary/Treasurer and~~
Chief Financial Officer
Date:
~~May 11,~~August 7, 2009

Date:
~~May 11,~~August 7, 2009

3334

Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX

~~10.1~~3.1.4
~~2009 Short-Term Incentive Plan~~Fourth Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation. ·

~~23.1~~10.18
~~Consent of Gifford Fong Associates.~~Consulting Agreement entered into between the Company and Christopher E. Beach. ·

10.19
Agreement entered into by Company for sale of remaining outstanding auction-rate securities. ·
31.1
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer. ·

31.2
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer. ·

32.1
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. ·

32.2
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. ·

·- Filed herewith.

3435

			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Description	3/31/09		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Available-for-sale securities	$	8,816,320	$	—	$	—	$	8,816,320