Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

x      QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 20122013

 

OR

 

o         TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from              to              .

 

Commission file number 0-16244

 


 

VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

Delaware

 

11-2989601

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

Terminal Drive
Plainview, New York

 

11803

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (516) 677-0200

 

Website: www.veeco.com

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  x No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  x No  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer  x

 

Accelerated filer  o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer  o
(Do not check if a Smaller reporting company)

 

Smaller reporting company  o

(Do not check if a Smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes  o No  x

 

39,156,63439,246,279 shares of common stock $0.01 par value per share, were outstanding as of the close of business on July 23, 2012.October 24, 2013.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENTSafe Harbor Statement

 

This Quarterly Reportquarterly report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Discussions containing such forward-looking statements may be found in Part I. Items 2 and 3 hereof, as well as within this Report generally. In addition, when used in this Report, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “estimates,” “plans,” “intends” “will” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the following:

 

·                  Our operating results have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by unfavorable market conditions;

·                  MarketTiming of market adoption of LEDlight emitting diode (“LED”) technology for general lighting could be slower than anticipated;is uncertain;

·                  Our failure to successfully manage our outsourcing activities or failure of our outsourcing partners to perform as anticipated could adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to adapt to fluctuating order volumes;

·                  The further reduction or elimination of foreign government subsidies and economic incentives may adversely affect the future order rate for our MOCVDmetal organic chemical vapor deposition (“MOCVD”) equipment;

·                  Our operating results have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by tightening credit markets;

·                  Our backlog is subject to customer cancellation or modification and such cancellation could result in decreased sales and increased provisions for excess and obsolete inventory and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed;

·                  TheOur failure to estimate customer demand accurately could result in excess or obsolete inventory and\and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed, while manufacturing interruptions or delays could affect our ability to meet customer demand;

·                  The cyclicality of the industries we serve directly affects our business;

·                  We rely on a limited number of suppliers, some of whom are our sole source for particular components;

·                  Our sales to HB LED and data storage manufacturers are highly dependent on these manufacturers’ sales for consumer electronics applications, which can experience significant volatility due to seasonal and other factors, which could materially adversely impact our future results of operations;

·                  We are exposed to the risks of operating a global business, including the need to obtain export licenses for certain of our shipments and political risks in the countries we operate;

·We may be exposed to liabilities under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and any determination that we violated these or similar laws could have a material adverse effect on our business;

·                  The timing of our orders, shipments, and revenue recognition may cause our quarterly operating results to fluctuate significantly;

·                  We operate in industries characterized by rapid technological change;

·                  We face significant competition;

·                  We depend on a limited number of customers, located primarily in a limited number of regions, that operate in highly concentrated industries;

·                  Our sales cycle is long and unpredictable;

·Our material weaknesses in our internal control which have impeded, and may continue to impede, our ability to file timely and accurate periodic reports may cause us to incur significant additional costs and may continue to affect our stock price;

·The price of our common shares may be volatile and could decline significantly;

·                  Our inability to attract, retain, and motivate key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business;

·The price of our common shares may be volatile and could decline significantly;

·                  We are subject to foreign currency exchange risks;

·                  The enforcement and protection of our intellectual property rights may be expensive and could divert our limited resources;

·                  We may be subject to claims of intellectual property infringement by others;

·If we are subject to cyber-attacks we could incur substantial costs and, if such attacks are successful, could result in significant liabilities, reputational harm and disruption of our operations;

·                  Our acquisition strategy subjects us to risks associated with evaluating and pursuing these opportunities and

2



Table of Contents

integrating these businesses;

·                  We may be required to take additional impairment charges for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets or definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets;

 

1


Table of Contents

·                  Changes in accounting pronouncements or taxation rules or practices may adversely affect our financial results.results;

·                  We are subject to internal control evaluations and attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;Act and any delays or difficulty in satisfying these requirements or negative reports concerning our internal controls could adversely affect our future results of operations and our stock price;

·                  We are subject to risks of non-compliance with environmental, health and safety regulations.regulations;

·                  We have significant operations in locations which could be materially and adversely impacted in the event of a natural disaster or other significant disruption;

·                  We have adopted certain measures that may have anti-takeover effects which may make an acquisition of our Company by another company more difficult; and

·New regulations related to conflict minerals will force us to incur additional expenses, may make our supply chain more complex, and may result in damage to our relationships with customers; and

·                  The matters set forth in this Report generally, including the risk factors set forth in “Part 2.II. Item 1A. Risk Factors.”

 

Consequently, such forward-lookingforward looking statements should be regarded solely as the Company’s current plans, estimates and beliefs.beliefs of Veeco Instruments Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “Veeco”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our”, unless the context indicates otherwise). The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-lookingforward looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Explanatory Note

Although this Report relates to the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, certain information is presented as of the time this Report is being filed, rather than as of June 30, 2013. Our business and financial condition as of the date this Report is filed is different from what our business and financial condition was as of June 30, 2013.

During 2012, the Company commenced an internal investigation in response to information it received concerning certain issues, including contract documentation issues, related to a limited number of customer transactions in South Korea.  During the review of information in connection with the internal investigation, questions were raised that prompted the Company to conduct a comprehensive and extensive review of its revenue recognition accounting for certain multiple element arrangements.  The Company retained experienced counsel, assisted by an experienced outside accounting consulting firm, to oversee the accounting review undertaken by the Company.  The Company completed that review in October 2013.

The delay in filing our periodic reports began with an announcement, on November 15, 2012, regarding our accounting review of our application of accounting principles related to the Company’s sales of multiple element arrangements of  MOCVD systems in certain transactions originating in 2009 and 2010.  We conducted examinations of our MOCVD transactions to determine whether the revenue and related expenses were recognized in the appropriate accounting period.  Subsequently, we expanded our accounting review to other relevant transactions of similar multiple element arrangements arising since 2009.  In the course of our accounting review, we have examined more than 100 multiple element arrangements.

The primary focus of the Company’s accounting review concerned whether the Company correctly interpreted and applied generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) relating to revenue recognition for multiple element arrangements as set forth in Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104: Revenue Recognition, and ASC 605-25 - Revenue Recognition:  Multiple Element Arrangements (formerly known as EITF 00-21 and EITF 08-01), to certain sales of Veeco products.

We often enter into large orders with our customers consisting of several elements.  For accounting purposes, these are called multiple element arrangements, and can include systems, upgrades, spare parts, service, as well as certain other items.  Our accounting review examined the selected sales transactions to determine whether the Company appropriately: (1) identified all of the elements in its arrangements with customers; (2) determined the proper units of accounting as part of the arrangements; and (3) allocated the arrangements’ consideration to each of the units of accounting under the applicable accounting standards. As a result of our accounting review we identified errors in the consolidated financial statements related to prior periods. The errors were primarily attributable to the misapplication of U.S. GAAP for recognizing revenue and related costs under multiple element arrangements and accounting for warranties. We assessed the materiality of these errors, both quantitatively and qualitatively, and concluded that these errors were not material, individually or in the aggregate, to our consolidated financial statements in 2012 or any other prior periods.

2


Table of Contents

While performing the foregoing accounting review, our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer supervised and participated in conducting an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria in Internal Control— Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based upon that evaluation, management identified material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and therefore management concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting through the date of this Report based on the criteria established by COSO.

Notwithstanding the material weaknesses discussed in “Part I. Item 4. Controls and Procedures” in this report and based upon our accounting review performed during the delayed filing periods, our management has concluded that our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report on Form10-Q have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP for interim financial information.

 

Available Information

 

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, information statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).SEC. The public may obtain information by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is www.sec.gov.

 

Internet Address

 

We maintain a website where additional information concerning our business and various upcoming events can be found. The address of our website is www.veeco.comwww.veeco.com.. We provide a link on our website, under Investors — Financial Information — SEC Filings, through which investors can access our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Reportsannual reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reportsquarterly reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reportscurrent reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to such reports. These filings are posted to our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with the SEC.

 

3



Table of Contents

VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.

 

INDEX

 

PageSAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

1

EXPLANATORY NOTE

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.5

Financial Statements:

 

 

 

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

5

 

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

20

 

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2011ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

6

36

 

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (Unaudited)ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

7

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

8

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

17

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

29

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

2937

 

 

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

40

 

 

 

Item 1.

Legal ProceedingsITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

3140

 

ItemITEM 1A.

Risk Factors RISK FACTORS

3140

 

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

40

Item 6.

ExhibitsITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

3240

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

40

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

40

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

41

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

3342

 

4



Table of Contents

 

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)(Unaudited

 

 

Three months ended

 

Six months ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Net sales

 

$

136,547

 

$

264,815

 

$

276,456

 

$

519,491

 

Cost of sales

 

75,293

 

129,466

 

149,934

 

253,179

 

Gross profit

 

61,254

 

135,349

 

126,522

 

266,312

 

Operating expenses (income):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

20,893

 

27,461

 

40,666

 

50,397

 

Research and development

 

23,910

 

23,652

 

47,216

 

43,523

 

Amortization

 

1,185

 

1,334

 

2,400

 

2,242

 

Restructuring

 

 

 

63

 

 

Other, net

 

146

 

(68

)

111

 

(28

)

Total operating expenses

 

46,134

 

52,379

 

90,456

 

96,134

 

Operating income

 

15,120

 

82,970

 

36,066

 

170,178

 

Interest (income) expense, net

 

(329

)

86

 

(532

)

1,385

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

3,045

 

 

3,349

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

15,449

 

79,839

 

36,598

 

165,444

 

Income tax provision

 

4,438

 

23,521

 

9,125

 

51,147

 

Income from continuing operations

 

11,011

 

56,318

 

27,473

 

114,297

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

1,219

 

(59,698

)

1,138

 

(67,735

)

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

412

 

(22,586

)

381

 

(25,286

)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

807

 

(37,112

)

757

 

(42,449

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

11,818

 

$

19,206

 

$

28,230

 

$

71,848

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

0.29

 

$

1.37

 

$

0.72

 

$

2.83

 

Discontinued operations

 

0.02

 

(0.90

)

0.02

 

(1.05

)

Income

 

$

0.31

 

$

0.47

 

$

0.74

 

$

1.78

 

Diluted :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

0.28

 

$

1.31

 

$

0.71

 

$

2.67

 

Discontinued operations

 

0.02

 

(0.86

)

0.02

 

(0.99

)

Income

 

$

0.30

 

$

0.45

 

$

0.73

 

$

1.68

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

38,370

 

40,998

 

38,315

 

40,433

 

Diluted

 

38,988

 

43,002

 

38,925

 

42,780

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries)

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three months ended

 

Six months ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Net income

 

$

11,818

 

$

19,206

 

$

28,230

 

$

71,848

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities

 

(66

)

286

 

(184

)

349

 

Less: Reclassification adjustments for losses (gains) included in net income

 

1

 

(92

)

(9

)

(129

)

Net unrealized (loss) gain on available-for-sale securities

 

(65

)

194

 

(193

)

220

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation

 

244

 

686

 

(245

)

1,157

 

Comprehensive income

 

$

11,997

 

$

20,086

 

$

27,792

 

$

73,225

 

 

 

For the three months ended

 

For the six months ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net sales

 

$

97,435

 

$

136,547

 

$

159,216

 

$

276,456

 

Cost of sales

 

62,795

 

75,293

 

102,024

 

149,934

 

Gross profit

 

34,640

 

61,254

 

57,192

 

126,522

 

Operating expenses (income):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

19,779

 

20,893

 

39,427

 

40,666

 

Research and development

 

20,870

 

23,910

 

41,607

 

47,216

 

Amortization

 

855

 

1,185

 

1,711

 

2,400

 

Restructuring

 

 

 

531

 

63

 

Other, net

 

(52

)

146

 

352

 

111

 

Total operating expenses

 

41,452

 

46,134

 

83,628

 

90,456

 

Operating (loss) income

 

(6,812

)

15,120

 

(26,436

)

36,066

 

Interest income, net

 

236

 

329

 

428

 

532

 

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

(6,576

)

15,449

 

(26,008

)

36,598

 

Income tax (benefit) provision

 

(2,495

)

4,438

 

(11,856

)

9,125

 

(Loss) income from continuing operations

 

(4,081

)

11,011

 

(14,152

)

27,473

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

 

1,219

 

 

1,138

 

Income tax provision

 

 

412

 

 

381

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

807

 

 

757

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(4,081

)

$

11,818

 

$

(14,152

)

$

28,230

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Loss) income per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

(0.11

)

$

0.29

 

$

(0.37

)

$

0.72

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.02

 

(Loss) income

 

$

(0.11

)

$

0.31

 

$

(0.37

)

$

0.74

 

Diluted :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

(0.11

)

$

0.28

 

$

(0.37

)

$

0.71

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

0.02

 

 

0.02

 

(Loss) income

 

$

(0.11

)

$

0.30

 

$

(0.37

)

$

0.73

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

38,764

 

38,370

 

38,740

 

38,315

 

Diluted

 

38,764

 

38,988

 

38,740

 

38,925

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance SheetsStatements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

317,047

 

$

217,922

 

Short-term investments

 

221,832

 

273,591

 

Restricted cash

 

851

 

577

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

95,125

 

95,038

 

Inventories

 

90,729

 

113,434

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

28,577

 

40,756

 

Assets of discontinued segment held for sale

 

 

2,341

 

Deferred income taxes

 

10,298

 

10,885

 

Total current assets

 

764,459

 

754,544

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment at cost, net

 

97,068

 

86,067

 

Goodwill

 

55,828

 

55,828

 

Intangible assets, net

 

23,483

 

25,882

 

Other assets

 

9,137

 

13,742

 

Total assets

 

$

949,975

 

$

936,063

 

Liabilities and equity

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

32,652

 

$

40,398

 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

95,168

 

107,656

 

Deferred profit

 

10,301

 

10,275

 

Income taxes payable

 

1,350

 

3,532

 

Liabilities of discontinued segment held for sale

 

5,359

 

5,359

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

258

 

248

 

Total current liabilities

 

145,088

 

167,468

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

5,023

 

5,029

 

Long-term debt

 

2,275

 

2,406

 

Other liabilities

 

324

 

640

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, 500,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding

 

 

 

Common stock; $.01 par value; authorized 120,000,000 shares; 39,143,126 and 38,768,436 shares issued and outstanding in 2012 and 2011, respectively

 

385

 

435

 

Additional paid-in-capital

 

697,303

 

688,353

 

Retained earnings

 

93,425

 

265,317

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

6,152

 

6,590

 

Less: treasury stock, at cost; 5,278,828 shares in 2011

 

 

(200,175

)

Total equity

 

797,265

 

760,520

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

949,975

 

$

936,063

 

 

 

For the three months ended

 

For the six months ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(4,081

)

$

11,818

 

$

(14,152

)

$

28,230

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities (net of taxes of $63, $(24), $79 and $(67))

 

(183

)

(66

)

(162

)

(184

)

Less: Reclassification adjustments for (gains) losses included in net (loss) income

 

(13

)

1

 

(50

)

(9

)

Net unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities

 

(196

)

(65

)

(212

)

(193

)

Foreign currency translation (net of taxes of $(176), $(37), $(189) and $(30))

 

(499

)

244

 

(1,262

)

(245

)

Comprehensive (loss) income

 

$

(4,776

)

$

11,997

 

$

(15,626

)

$

27,792

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsBalance Sheets
(In thousands, except per share data)

(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

 

 

Six months ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

28,230

 

$

71,848

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

7,834

 

5,801

 

Amortization of debt discount

 

 

1,260

 

Non-cash equity-based compensation

 

7,144

 

6,517

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

3,349

 

Deferred income taxes

 

587

 

6,749

 

Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises

 

(978

)

(7,254

)

Other, net

 

 

41

 

Non-cash items from discontinued operations

 

(1,285

)

52,792

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

7

 

23,813

 

Inventories

 

22,888

 

(26,150

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

8,875

 

(41,915

)

Supplier deposits

 

3,328

 

(516

)

Accounts payable

 

(7,756

)

27,748

 

Accrued expenses, deferred profit and other current liabilities

 

(12,476

)

(3,326

)

Income taxes payable

 

(1,205

)

(44,737

)

Other, net

 

5,358

 

(708

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

60,551

 

75,312

 

Investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

(16,601

)

(31,291

)

Payments for net assets of businesses acquired

 

 

(28,273

)

Transfers (to) from restricted cash

 

(275

)

21,633

 

Proceeds from sales of short-term investments

 

99,533

 

374,226

 

Payments for purchases of short-term investments

 

(49,014

)

(361,051

)

Other

 

 

1

 

Proceeds from sale of assets from discontinued segment

 

3,758

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

37,401

 

(24,755

)

Financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from stock option exercises

 

2,161

 

9,095

 

Restricted stock tax withholdings

 

(1,330

)

(2,658

)

Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises

 

978

 

7,254

 

Purchases of treasury stock

 

 

(7,753

)

Repayments of long-term debt

 

(121

)

(105,686

)

Other

 

 

(2

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

1,688

 

(99,750

)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

(515

)

1,729

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

99,125

 

(47,464

)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

217,922

 

245,132

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

317,047

 

$

197,668

 

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

241,548

 

$

384,557

 

Short-term investments

 

340,332

 

192,234

 

Restricted cash

 

3,448

 

2,017

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

44,736

 

63,169

 

Inventories

 

64,107

 

59,807

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

32,895

 

32,155

 

Deferred income taxes

 

16,918

 

10,545

 

Total current assets

 

743,984

 

744,484

 

Property, plant and equipment at cost, net

 

96,949

 

98,302

 

Goodwill

 

55,828

 

55,828

 

Deferred income taxes

 

5,136

 

935

 

Intangible assets, net

 

19,263

 

20,974

 

Other assets

 

16,908

 

16,781

 

Total assets

 

$

938,068

 

$

937,304

 

Liabilities and equity

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

46,948

 

$

26,087

 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

59,176

 

74,260

 

Deferred revenue

 

17,294

 

9,380

 

Income taxes payable

 

112

 

2,292

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

279

 

268

 

Total current liabilities

 

123,809

 

112,287

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

7,168

 

7,137

 

Long-term debt

 

1,995

 

2,138

 

Other liabilities

 

4,779

 

4,530

 

Total liabilities

 

137,751

 

126,092

 

Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, 500,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding

 

 

 

Common stock; $.01 par value; authorized 120,000,000 shares; 39,254,671 and 39,328,503 shares issued and outstanding in 2013 and 2012, respectively

 

393

 

393

 

Additional paid-in-capital

 

713,454

 

708,723

 

Retained earnings

 

81,971

 

96,123

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

4,499

 

5,973

 

Total equity

 

800,317

 

811,212

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

938,068

 

$

937,304

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

7



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
 (In thousands)
(Unaudited)

 

 

Six months ended
June 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(14,152

)

$

28,230

 

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

7,985

 

7,834

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(10,571

)

587

 

Non-cash equity-based compensation

 

6,292

 

7,144

 

Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises

 

(461

)

(978

)

Non-cash items from discontinued operations

 

 

(1,285

)

Other, net

 

26

 

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

18,099

 

7

 

Inventories

 

(4,211

)

22,888

 

Accounts payable

 

20,912

 

(7,756

)

Accrued expenses, deferred revenue and other current liabilities

 

(7,095

)

(12,476

)

Income taxes payable

 

(1,708

)

(1,205

)

Other, net

 

(1,365

)

17,286

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

13,751

 

60,276

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

(5,999

)

(16,601

)

Proceeds from sales of short-term investments

 

272,449

 

99,533

 

Payments for purchases of short-term investments

 

(420,767

)

(49,014

)

Proceeds from sale of assets from discontinued segment

 

 

3,758

 

Other

 

(718

)

 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

(155,035

)

37,676

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from stock option exercises

 

313

 

2,161

 

Restricted stock tax withholdings

 

(2,335

)

(1,330

)

Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises

 

461

 

978

 

Repayments of long-term debt

 

(132

)

(121

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(1,693

)

1,688

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

(32

)

(515

)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(143,009

)

99,125

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

384,557

 

217,922

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

241,548

 

$

317,047

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-cash investing and financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers from property, plant and equipment to inventory

 

$

2,224

 

$

 

Transfers from inventory to property, plant and equipment

 

$

1,144

 

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

8


Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

 

Note 1—Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Veeco Instruments Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “Veeco,”“Veeco”, the “Company” or, “we”), “us”, and “our”, unless the context indicates otherwise) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S.”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S.U.S generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation (consisting of normal recurring accruals) have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012,2013, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2012.2013. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Reportannual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.2012.

 

Consistent with prior years, we report interim quarters, other than fourth quarters which always end on December 31, on a 13-week basis ending on the last Sunday of each period. The interim quarter ends are determined at the beginning of each year based on the 13-week quarters. The 2013 interim quarter ends are March 31, June 30 and September 29. The 2012 interim quarter ends arewere April 1, July 1 and September 30. The 2011 interim quarter ends were April 3, July 3 and October 2. For ease of reference, we report these interim quarter ends as March 31, June 30 and September 30 in our interim condensed consolidated financial statements. We have reclassified certain amounts previously reported in our financial statements to conform to the current presentation, including amounts related to discontinued operations.

 

Accounting Review

During 2012, the Company commenced an internal investigation in response to information it received concerning certain issues, including contract documentation issues, related to a limited number of customer transactions in South Korea.  During the review of information in connection with the internal investigation, questions were raised that prompted the Company to conduct a comprehensive and extensive review of its revenue recognition accounting for certain multiple element arrangements.  The Company retained experienced counsel, assisted by an experienced outside accounting consulting firm, to oversee the accounting review undertaken by the Company.  The Company completed that review in October 2013.

The delay in filing our periodic reports began with an announcement, on November 15, 2012, regarding our accounting review of our application of accounting principles related to the Company’s sales of multiple element arrangements of Metal Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition (“MOCVD”) systems in certain transactions originating in 2009 and 2010.  We conducted examinations of our MOCVD transactions to determine whether the revenue and related expenses were recognized in the appropriate accounting period.  Subsequently, we expanded our accounting review to other relevant transactions of similar multiple element arrangements arising since 2009.  In the course of our accounting review, we have examined more than 100 multiple element arrangements.

The primary focus of the Company’s accounting review concerned whether the Company correctly interpreted and applied generally accepted accounting principles relating to revenue recognition for multiple element arrangements as set forth in Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104: Revenue Recognition, and ASC 605-25 - Revenue Recognition:  Multiple Element Arrangements (formerly known as EITF 00-21 and EITF 08-01), to certain sales of Veeco products.

We often enter into large orders with our customers consisting of several elements.  For accounting purposes, these are called multiple element arrangements, and can include systems, upgrades, spare parts, services, as well as certain other items.  Our accounting review examined the selected sales transactions to determine whether the Company appropriately: (1) identified all of the elements in its arrangements with customers; (2) determined the proper units of accounting as part of the arrangements; and (3) allocated the arrangements’ consideration to each of the units of accounting under the applicable accounting standards.  As a result of our accounting review we identified errors in the consolidated financial statements related to prior periods. The errors were primarily attributable to the misapplication of U.S. GAAP for recognizing revenue and related costs under multiple element arrangements and accounting for warranties. We assessed the materiality of these errors, both quantitatively and qualitatively, and concluded that these errors were not material, individually or in the aggregate, to our consolidated financial statements in 2012 or any other prior periods.

9


Table of Contents

Notwithstanding the material weaknesses discussed in “Part I. Item 4. Controls and Procedures” and based upon the accounting review discussed above, our management has concluded that our consolidated financial statements are fairly stated in all material respects in accordance with U.S. GAAP for interim financial statements.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates made by management include: the best estimate of selling price for our products and services; allowance for doubtful accounts; inventory valuation; recoverability and useful lives of property, plant and equipment and identifiable intangible assets; investment valuations; fair value of derivatives; recoverability of goodwill and long-lived assets; recoverability of deferred tax assets; liabilities for product warranty; accruals for contingencies; equity-based payments, including forfeitures and performance based vesting; and liabilities for tax uncertainties. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(Loss) Income Per Common Share

 

The following table sets forth the reconciliation of basic weighted average shares outstanding and diluted weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands):

 

 

Three months ended

 

Six months ended

 

 

Three months ended

 

Six months ended

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

 

38,370

 

40,998

 

38,315

 

40,433

 

 

38,764

 

38,370

 

38,740

 

38,315

 

Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock

 

618

 

1,066

 

610

 

1,108

 

 

 

618

 

 

610

 

Dilutive effect of convertible notes

 

 

938

 

 

1,239

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

 

38,988

 

43,002

 

38,925

 

42,780

 

 

38,764

 

38,988

 

38,740

 

38,925

 

 

Basic (loss) income per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted (loss) income per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period.

 

During the second quarter of 2011, the entirePotentially dilutive securities attributable to outstanding principal balance of our convertible debt was converted, with the principal amount paid in cashstock options and the conversion premium paid in shares. The convertible notes met the criteria for determining the effect of the assumed conversion using the treasuryrestricted stock method of accounting, since we had settled the principal amount of the notes in cash. Using the treasury stock method, it was determined that the impact of the assumed conversion forwere approximately 0.9 million and 1.2 million common equivalent shares during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, had a2013, respectively. Potentially dilutive effect of 0.9securities attributable to outstanding stock options and restricted stock were approximately 1.5 million and 1.21.3 million common equivalent shares respectively.

Derivative Financial Instruments

We use derivative financial instruments to minimize the impact of foreign exchange rate changes on earnings and cash flows. In the normal course of business, our operations are exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. In order to reduce the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on short-term foreign currency-denominated intercompany transactions and other known foreign currency exposures, we enter into monthly forward contracts. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Our forward contracts are not expected to subject us to material risks due to exchange rate movements because gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset exchange gains and losses on the underlying assets and liabilities. The forward contracts are marked-to-market through earnings. We conduct our derivative transactions with highly rated financial institutions in an effort to mitigate any material credit risk.

The aggregate foreign currency exchange loss included in determining the condensed consolidated results of

8



Table of Contents

operations was approximately $0.3 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, and $0.1respectively.

Approximately 0.7 million and $0.40.6 million common equivalent shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share during the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively, because their effect on loss per share was anti-dilutive due to the net loss sustained during the respective periods.

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists with a customer; delivery of the specified products has occurred or services have been rendered; prices are contractually fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recorded including shipping and handling costs and excluding applicable taxes related to sales. A significant portion of our revenue is derived from contractual arrangements with customers that have multiple elements, such as systems, upgrades, components, spare parts, maintenance and service plans. For sales arrangements that contain multiple elements, we split the arrangement into separate units of accounting if the individually delivered elements have value to the customer on a standalone basis. We also evaluate whether multiple transactions with the same customer or related party should be considered part of a multiple element arrangement, whereby we assess, among other factors, whether the contracts or agreements are negotiated or executed within a short time frame of each other or if there are indicators that the contracts are negotiated in contemplation of each other. When we have separate units of accounting, we allocate revenue to each element based on the following selling price hierarchy: vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if available; third party evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available; or our best estimate of selling price (“BESP”) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. For the majority of the elements in our arrangements we utilize BESP. The accounting guidance for selling price hierarchy did not include BESP for arrangements entered into prior to January 1, 2011, respectively. Includedand as such we recognized revenue for those arrangements as described below.

10


Table of Contents

We consider many facts when evaluating each of our sales arrangements to determine the timing of revenue recognition, including the contractual obligations, the customer’s creditworthiness and the nature of the customer’s post-delivery acceptance provisions. Our system sales arrangements, including certain upgrades, generally include field acceptance provisions that may include functional or mechanical test procedures. For the majority of our arrangements, a customer source inspection of the system is performed in our facility or test data is sent to the customer documenting that the system is functioning to the agreed upon specifications prior to delivery. Historically, such source inspection or test data replicates the field acceptance provisions that will be performed at the customer’s site prior to final acceptance of the system. As such, we objectively demonstrate that the criteria specified in the aggregate foreign currency exchange losses were losses (gains)contractual acceptance provisions are achieved prior to delivery and, therefore, we recognize revenue upon delivery since there is no substantive contingency remaining related to forward contractsthe acceptance provisions as of $0.2 millionthat date, subject to the retention amount constraint described below. For new products, new applications of existing products or for products with substantive customer acceptance provisions where we cannot objectively demonstrate that the criteria specified in the contractual acceptance provisions have been achieved prior to delivery, revenue and $0.1 million during the threeassociated costs are deferred and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectivelyfully recognized upon the receipt of final customer acceptance, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Our system sales arrangements, including certain upgrades, generally do not contain provisions for right of return or forfeiture, refund, or other purchase price concessions.  In the rare instances where such provisions are included, we defer all revenue until such rights expire.  In many cases our products are sold with a billing retention, typically 10% of the sales price (the “retention amount”), which is typically payable by the customer when field acceptance provisions are completed.  The amount of revenue recognized upon delivery of a system or upgrade is limited to the lower of i) the amount that is not contingent upon acceptance provisions or ii) the value allocated to the delivered elements, if such sale is part of a multiple-element arrangement.

For transactions entered into prior to January 1, 2011, under the accounting rules for multiple-element arrangements in place at that time, we deferred the greater of the retention amount or the relative fair value of the undelivered elements based on VSOE.  When we could not establish VSOE or TPE for all undelivered elements of an arrangement, revenue on the entire arrangement was deferred until the earlier of the point when we did have VSOE for all undelivered elements or the delivery of all elements of the arrangement.

Our sales arrangements, including certain upgrades, generally include installation.  The installation process is not deemed essential to the functionality of the equipment since it is not complex; that is, it does not require significant changes to the features or capabilities of the equipment or involve building elaborate interfaces or connections subsequent to factory acceptance. We have a demonstrated history of consistently completing installations in a timely manner and ($0.3) millioncan reliably estimate the costs of such activities. Most customers engage us to perform the installation services, although there are other third-party providers with sufficient knowledge who could complete these services. Based on these factors, we deem the installation of our systems to be inconsequential and ($0.8) million duringperfunctory relative to the threesystem as a whole, and six months ended June 30, 2011. These amounts wereas a result, do not consider such services to be a separate element of the arrangement. As such, we accrue the cost of the installation at the time of revenue recognition for the system.

In Japan, where our contractual terms with customers generally specify title and risk and rewards of ownership transfer upon customer acceptance, revenue is recognized and are included in Other, net in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statementscustomer is billed upon the receipt of Income.written customer acceptance.

 

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there were no gains or lossesRevenue related to forwardmaintenance and service contracts includedis recognized ratably over the applicable contract term.  Component and spare part revenue are recognized at the time of delivery in prepaid expenses and other current assets or accrued expenses and other current liabilities. Monthly forward contractsaccordance with a notional amountthe terms of $0.6 million, entered into in June 2012 for October 2012, will be settled in October 2012.

The weighted average notional amount of derivative contracts outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was approximately $1.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively.applicable sales arrangement.

 

Note 2 — Discontinued Operations

 

CIGS Solar Systems Business

On July 28, 2011, we announced a plan to discontinue our CIGS solar systems business. The action, whichThere was completed on September 27, 2011, was$0.8 million in response to the dramatically reduced cost of mainstream solar technologies driven by significant reductions in prices, large industry investment, a lower than expected end market acceptance for CIGS technology and technical barriers in scaling CIGS. This business was previously included as part of our LED & Solar segment.

Accordingly, the results of operations for the CIGS solar systems business have been recorded asincome from discontinued operations in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income for all periods presented. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, total discontinued operations include charges totaling $59.3 million and $66.8 million, respectively. These charges include an inventory write-off totaling $33.4 million, charges to settle contracts totaling $11.1 million and an asset impairment charge totaling $6.2 million.

Metrology

On August 15, 2010, we signed a definitive agreement to sell our Metrology business to Bruker Corporation (“Bruker”) comprising our entire Metrology reporting segment for $229.4 million. Accordingly, Metrology’s operating results were accounted for as discontinued operations and the related assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale. The sale transaction closed on October 7, 2010, except for assets located in China due to local restrictions. Total proceeds, which included a working capital adjustment of $1 million, totaled $230.4 million of which $7.2 million relates to the net assets in China. The Companywith no sales recorded a liability to defer the gain of $5.4 million on disposal related to the assets in China. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded a $1.4 million gain on the sale of assets of this discontinued segment that were held for sale.

Summary information related to discontinued operations is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Three months ended June 30, 2012

 

Three months ended June 30, 2011

 

 

 

Solar Systems

 

Metrology

 

Total

 

Solar Systems

 

Metrology

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Cost of sales

 

 

 

 

35,281

 

 

35,281

 

Gross profit

 

 

 

 

(35,281

)

 

(35,281

)

Total operating expenses (income)

 

80

 

(1,299

)

(1,219

)

24,020

 

397

 

24,417

 

Operating (loss) income

 

$

(80

)

$

1,299

 

$

1,219

 

$

(59,301

)

$

(397

)

$

(59,698

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

$

(53

)

$

860

 

$

807

 

$

(37,106

)

$

(6

)

$

(37,112

)

9



Table of Contents

 

 

Six months ended June 30, 2012

 

Six months ended June 30, 2011

 

 

 

Solar Systems

 

Metrology

 

Total

 

Solar Systems

 

Metrology

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Cost of sales

 

 

 

 

36,912

 

 

36,912

 

Gross profit

 

 

 

 

(36,912

)

 

(36,912

)

Total operating expenses (income)

 

74

 

(1,212

)

(1,138

)

29,928

 

895

 

30,823

 

Operating (loss) income

 

$

(74

)

$

1,212

 

$

1,138

 

$

(66,840

)

$

(895

)

$

(67,735

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

$

(49

)

$

806

 

$

757

 

$

(42,002

)

$

(447

)

$

(42,449

)

Liabilities of discontinued segment held for sale, totaling $5.4 million, as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, consist of the deferred gain related to the net assets of the former Metrology business in China.

Note 3— Equity

Equity-based Compensation

Equity-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over each employee’s requisite service period. The following compensation expense was included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):

 

 

Three months ended

 

Six months ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

2012

 

2011

 

Equity-based compensation expense

 

$

4,014

 

$

3,717

 

$

7,144

 

$

6,517

 

As a result of the discontinuance of our CIGS solar systems business, equity-based compensation expense related to the business totaling $0.3 million and $0.6 million has been classified as discontinued operations in determining the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.2012.

 

As of June 30, 2012, the total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested stock and stock option awards was $21.8 million and $18.5 million, respectively. The related weighted average period over which we expect that such unrecognized compensation costs will be recognized is approximately 3.1 years for nonvested stock awards and 2.3 years for option awards.

Stock Option and Restricted Stock Activity

A summary of our restricted stock awards including restricted stock units for the six months ended June 30, 2012, is presented below:

 

 

Shares 
(000’s)

 

Weighted-
Average 
Grant-Date 
Fair Value

 

Nonvested as of December 31, 2011

 

618

 

$

33.61

 

Granted

 

307

 

32.64

 

Vested

 

(133

)

19.42

 

Forfeited (including cancelled awards)

 

(31

)

32.79

 

Nonvested as of June 30, 2012

 

761

 

$

35.73

 

1011



Table of Contents

 

A summary of our stock option awards for the six months ended June 30, 2012, is presented below:

 

 

Shares 
(000s)

 

Weighted-
Average 
Exercise 
Price

 

Aggregate 
Intrinsic 
Value 
(000s)

 

Weighted- 
Average 
Remaining 
Contractual 
Life 
(in years)

 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2011

 

2,106

 

$

25.58

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

687

 

32.56

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

(143

)

15.05

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited (including cancelled options)

 

(52

)

31.06

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding as of June 30, 2012

 

2,598

 

$

27.90

 

$

22,593

 

6.7

 

Options exercisable as of June 30, 2012

 

1,414

 

$

20.89

 

$

20,823

 

4.8

 

Treasury Stock

On August 24, 2010, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of our common stock. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, we purchased 165,288 shares for $7.8 million (including transaction costs) under the program at an average cost of $46.91 per share. This stock repurchase is included as a reduction to Equity in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. All funds for this repurchase program were exhausted as of August 19, 2011. Repurchases were made from time to time on the open market in accordance with applicable federal securities laws. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we cancelled and retired the 5,278,828 shares of treasury stock we purchased under the repurchase program. As a result of this transaction, we recorded a reduction in treasury stock of $200.2 million and a corresponding reduction of $200.1 million and $0.1 million in retained earnings and common stock, respectively.

Note 4—3—Balance Sheet Information

 

Short-termCash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and certain highly liquid investments. Highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased may be classified as cash equivalents. Such items may include liquid money market accounts, treasury bills, government agency securities and corporate debt. The investments that are classified as cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

Short-Term Investments

 

Available-for-sale securities consist of the following (in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2012

 

 

 

Amortized 
Cost

 

Gains in 
Accumulated 
Other 
Comprehensive 
Income

 

Losses in 
Accumulated 
Other 
Comprehensive 
Income

 

Estimated 
Fair Value

 

Government Agency Securities

 

$

43,742

 

$

23

 

$

 

$

43,765

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FDIC insured corporate bonds

 

60,958

 

4

 

 

60,962

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treasury bills

 

117,106

 

 

(1

)

117,105

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total available-for-sale securities

 

$

221,806

 

$

27

 

$

(1

)

$

221,832

 

 

 

June 30, 2013

 

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gains in
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income

 

Losses in
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income

 

Estimated Fair
Value

 

United States treasuries

 

$

196,063

 

$

27

 

$

(28

)

$

196,062

 

Corporate bonds

 

75,837

 

4

 

(213

)

75,628

 

Goverment agency securities

 

64,647

 

8

 

(13

)

64,642

 

Commercial paper

 

4,000

 

 

 

4,000

 

Total available-for-sale securities

 

$

340,547

 

$

39

 

$

(254

)

$

340,332

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

Amortized 
Cost

 

Gains in 
Accumulated 
Other 
Comprehensive 
Income

 

Losses in 
Accumulated 
Other 
Comprehensive 
Income

 

Estimated 
Fair Value

 

Government Agency Securities

 

$

88,585

 

$

119

 

$

 

$

88,704

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FDIC insured corporate bonds

 

114,640

 

56

 

 

114,696

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Treasury bills

 

70,147

 

44

 

 

70,191

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total available-for-sale securities

 

$

273,372

 

$

219

 

$

 

$

273,591

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, available-for-sale securities were liquidated for total proceeds of $171.2 million and $272.4 million, respectively. There were minimal gross realized gains on these sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

 

Amortized
Cost

 

Gains in
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income

 

Losses in
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income

 

Estimated Fair
Value

 

United States treasuries

 

$

184,102

 

$

76

 

$

 

$

184,178

 

Government agency securities

 

8,056

 

 

 

8,056

 

Total available-for-sale securities

 

$

192,158

 

$

76

 

$

 

$

192,234

 

12


Table of Contents

 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, available-for-sale securities were soldliquidated for total proceeds of $55.9 million and $99.5 million, respectively. TheThere were minimal gross realized gains and losses on these sales were minimal for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. For purpose of determining gross realized gains and losses, the cost of securities sold is based on specific identification. Net unrealized holding losses on available-for-

 

11



TableThe table below shows the fair value of Contentsshort-term investments that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than 12 months (in thousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2013

 

 

 

Less than 12 months

 

Total

 

 

 

Estimated
Fair Value

 

Gross Unrealized
Losses

 

Estimated Fair
Value

 

Gross Unrealized
Losses

 

Corporate bonds

 

$

66,351

 

$

(213

)

$

66,351

 

$

(213

)

United States treasuries

 

44,881

 

(28

)

44,881

 

(28

)

Government agency securities

 

7,987

 

(13

)

7,987

 

(13

)

Total

 

$

119,219

 

$

(254

)

$

119,219

 

$

(254

)

sale securities

As of $0.1 million and $0.2 millionDecember 31, 2012 we did not hold any short-term investments that were in a loss position. We did not hold any short-term investments that have been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer for the threeperiods noted in the table above.

The Company regularly reviews its investment portfolio to identify and six months endedevaluate investments that have indications of possible impairment. Factors considered in determining whether an unrealized loss was considered to be temporary or other-than-temporary and therefore impaired include: the length of time and extent to which fair value has been lower than the cost basis; the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee; and whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security prior to recovery. The Company believes the gross unrealized losses on the Company’s short-term investments as of June 30, 2012, respectively, have been included2013 were temporary in accumulated other comprehensive income. During the threenature and six months ended June 30, 2011, available-for-sale securities were sold for total proceeds of $252.0 million and $374.2 million, respectively. The gross realized gains on these sales were $0.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. Net unrealized holding gains on available-for-sale securities amounting to $0.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, have been included in accumulated other comprehensive income.therefore did not recognize any impairment.

 

Contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt securities at June 30, 2012, are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

June 30, 2013

 

 

Estimated Fair Value

 

 

Estimated Fair Value

 

Due in one year or less

 

$

30,751

 

 

$

247,937

 

 

 

 

Due in 1—2 years

 

191,081

 

 

32,271

 

 

 

 

Total investments in debt securities

 

$

221,832

 

Due in 2—3 years

 

60,124

 

Total available-for-sale securities

 

$

340,332

 

 

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because some borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

 

Restricted Cash

 

As of June 30, 20122013 and December 31, 2011,2012, restricted cash consisted of $0.9$3.4 million and $0.6$2.0 million, respectively, which serves as collateral for bank guarantees that provide financial assurance that the Company will fulfill certain customer obligations. This cash is held in custody by the issuing bank and is restricted as to withdrawal or use while the related bank guarantees are outstanding.

 

Accounts Receivable, netNet

 

Accounts receivable are shown net of the allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.5 million as of June 30, 20122013 and December 31, 2011.2012.

13


Table of Contents

 

Inventories

 

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out) or market. Inventories consist of (in thousands):

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Raw materials

 

$

54,992

 

$

57,169

 

Materials

 

$

36,499

 

$

36,523

 

Work in process

 

22,049

 

20,118

 

 

19,815

 

13,363

 

Finished goods

 

13,688

 

36,147

 

 

7,793

 

9,921

 

 

$

90,729

 

$

113,434

 

 

$

64,107

 

$

59,807

 

Cost Method Investment

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 we have recorded a total investment of $15.3 million and $14.5 million, respectively, in a rapidly developing organic light emitting diode (“OLED”) equipment company (the “Investment”). Our ownership in the Investment is approximately 15.3% of the preferred shares and a 12.0% interest in the total of the company. Since we do not exert significant influence on the Investment, this investment is treated under the cost method in accordance with applicable accounting guidance. The fair value of this investment is not estimated because there are no identified events or changes in circumstances that may indicate an other-than-temporary decline in the fair value of the investment, and we are exempt from estimating interim fair values because the investment does not meet the definition of a publicly traded company. This investment is recorded in other assets in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Subsequently, during the third quarter of 2013, we invested an additional $0.8 million in the Investment.

Customer Deposits

As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had customer deposits of $27.4 million and $32.7 million, respectively, which are recorded as a component of accrued expenses and other current liabilities.

 

Accrued Warranty

 

We estimate the costs that may be incurred under the warrantywarranties we provide and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized. Factors that affect our warranty liability include product failure rates, material usage and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. This accrual is recorded in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  We periodically assess the adequacy of our recognized warranty liability and adjust the amount as necessary.  Changes in our warranty liability during the period are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

June 30,

 

 

June 30,

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Balance as of the beginning of period

 

$

9,778

 

$

9,238

 

 

$

4,942

 

$

8,731

 

Warranties issued during the period

 

1,502

 

5,843

 

 

1,806

 

1,547

 

Settlements made during the period

 

(3,821

)

(4,489

)

 

(2,540

)

(3,625

)

Changes in estimate during the period

 

 

25

 

Balance as of the end of period

 

$

7,459

 

$

10,592

 

 

$

4,208

 

$

6,678

 

In the current year’s presentation we no longer include installation in the accrued warranty balance; therefore, in order to conform the balance to current year presentation, we have reclassified $1.047 million from the beginning balance of 2012 accrued warranty to accrued installation which, along with accrued warranty, is also a component of accrued expenses and other current liabilities.

 

1214



Table of Contents

Mortgage Payable

We have a mortgage payable with approximately $2.3 million outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and $2.4 million outstanding as of December 31, 2012. The mortgage accrues interest at an annual rate of 7.91%, and the final payment is due on January 1, 2020. The fair value of the mortgage as of June 30, 2013 was approximately $2.4 million and $2.6 million as of December 31, 2012.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income are (in thousands):

As of June 30, 2013

 

Gross

 

Taxes

 

Net

 

Translation adjustments

 

$

5,967

 

$

(528

)

$

5,439

 

Minimum pension liability

 

(1,285

)

510

 

(775

)

Unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities

 

(215

)

50

 

(165

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

$

4,467

 

$

32

 

$

4,499

 

As of December 31, 2012

 

Gross

 

Taxes

 

Net

 

Translation adjustments

 

$

7,040

 

$

(339

)

$

6,701

 

Minimum pension liability

 

(1,285

)

510

 

(775

)

Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities

 

76

 

(29

)

47

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

$

5,831

 

$

142

 

$

5,973

 

 

Note 5—4—Segment Information

 

We manage the business, review operating results and assess performance, as well as allocate resources, based upon four reporting units that are aggregated into two separatesegments: the VIBE and Mechanical reporting segments that reflectunits which are reported in our Data Storage segment; and the market focus of each business. TheMOCVD and molecular beam epitaxy (“MBE”) reporting units which are reported in our Light Emitting Diode (“LED”) and Solar segment. In identifying the reporting units, management considered the economic characteristics of operating segments including the products and services provided, production processes, types or classes of customer and product distribution.  Our LED & Solar segment consists of metal organic chemical vapor deposition (“MOCVD”)MOCVD systems, molecular beam epitaxy (“MBE”)MBE systems and thermal deposition sources. These systems are primarily sold to customers in the high-brightness LED, (“HB LED”), wireless devices and solar industries, as well as to scientific research customers. This segment has manufacturing, product development and marketing sites in Somerset, New Jersey,Jersey; Poughkeepsie, New YorkYork; and St. Paul, Minnesota. TheOur Data Storage segment consists of the ion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond-like carbon, physical vapor deposition and dicing and slicing products sold primarily to customers in the data storage industry. This segment has manufacturing, product development and marketing sites in Plainview, New York,York; Camarillo, CaliforniaCalifornia; and Ft. Collins, Colorado.

 

We evaluate the performance of our reportable segments based on income (loss) from continuing operations before interest, income taxes, amortization and certain items (“Segment(in the aggregate “segment profit (loss)”), which is the primary indicator used to plan and forecast future periods. The presentation of this financial measure facilitates meaningful comparison with prior periods, as management believes Segmentsegment profit (loss) reports baseline performance and thus provides useful information. Certain items include restructuring charges and equity-based compensation expense and loss on extinguishment of debt.expense. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of critical accounting policies.

 

1315



Table of Contents

 

The following tables present certain data pertaining to our reportable product segments and a reconciliation of segment profit (loss) to income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively, and goodwill and total assets as of June 30, 20122013 and December 31, 20112012 (in thousands):

 

 

LED & Solar

 

Data Storage

 

Unallocated 
Corporate 
Amount

 

Total

 

 

LED & Solar

 

Data Storage

 

Unallocated
Corporate

 

Total

 

Three months ended June 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

75,933

 

$

21,502

 

$

 

$

97,435

 

Segment profit (loss)

 

$

3,124

 

$

(121

)

$

(5,247

)

$

(2,244

)

Interest income, net

 

 

 

236

 

236

 

Amortization

 

(532

)

(323

)

 

(855

)

Equity-based compensation

 

(1,316

)

(488

)

(1,909

)

(3,713

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

1,276

 

$

(932

)

$

(6,920

)

$

(6,576

)

Three months ended June 30, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

86,778

 

$

49,769

 

$

 

$

136,547

 

 

$

86,778

 

$

49,769

 

$

 

$

136,547

 

Segment profit (loss)

 

$

9,587

 

$

12,136

 

$

(1,404

)

$

20,319

 

 

$

9,587

 

$

12,136

 

$

(1,404

)

$

20,319

 

Interest, net

 

 

 

(329

)

(329

)

Interest income, net

 

 

 

329

 

329

 

Amortization

 

861

 

324

 

 

1,185

 

 

(861

)

(324

)

 

(1,185

)

Equity-based compensation

 

1,096

 

440

 

2,478

 

4,014

 

 

(1,096

)

(440

)

(2,478

)

(4,014

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

7,630

 

$

11,372

 

$

(3,553

)

$

15,449

 

 

$

7,630

 

$

11,372

 

$

(3,553

)

$

15,449

 

Three months ended June 30, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Six months ended June 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

219,135

 

$

45,680

 

$

 

$

264,815

 

 

$

118,240

 

$

40,976

 

$

 

$

159,216

 

Segment profit (loss)

 

$

79,052

 

$

13,050

 

$

(4,081

)

$

88,021

 

Interest, net

 

 

 

86

 

86

 

Segment (loss) profit

 

$

(8,098

)

$

254

 

$

(10,058

)

$

(17,902

)

Interest income, net

 

 

 

428

 

428

 

Amortization

 

953

 

356

 

25

 

1,334

 

 

(1,064

)

(647

)

 

(1,711

)

Equity-based compensation

 

892

 

352

 

2,473

 

3,717

 

 

(2,026

)

(618

)

(3,648

)

(6,292

)

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

3,045

 

3,045

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

77,207

 

$

12,342

 

$

(9,710

)

$

79,839

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring

 

(423

)

(50

)

(58

)

(531

)

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

(11,611

)

$

(1,061

)

$

(13,336

)

$

(26,008

)

Six months ended June 30, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

182,352

 

$

94,104

 

$

 

$

276,456

 

 

$

182,352

 

$

94,104

 

$

 

$

276,456

 

Segment profit (loss)

 

$

27,073

 

$

21,089

 

$

(2,489

)

$

45,673

 

 

$

27,073

 

$

21,089

 

$

(2,489

)

$

45,673

 

Interest, net

 

 

 

(532

)

(532

)

Interest income, net

 

 

 

532

 

532

 

Amortization

 

1,724

 

676

 

 

2,400

 

 

(1,724

)

(676

)

 

(2,400

)

Equity-based compensation

 

2,102

 

851

 

4,191

 

7,144

 

 

(2,102

)

(851

)

(4,191

)

(7,144

)

Restructuring

 

58

 

5

 

 

63

 

 

(58

)

(5

)

 

(63

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

23,189

 

$

19,557

 

$

(6,148

)

$

36,598

 

 

$

23,189

 

$

19,557

 

$

(6,148

)

$

36,598

 

Six months ended June 30, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

433,833

 

$

85,658

 

$

 

$

519,491

 

Segment profit (loss)

 

$

160,029

 

$

25,281

 

$

(6,373

)

$

178,937

 

Interest, net

 

 

 

1,385

 

1,385

 

Amortization

 

1,440

 

719

 

83

 

2,242

 

Equity-based compensation

 

1,571

 

660

 

4,286

 

6,517

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

3,349

 

3,349

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

157,018

 

$

23,902

 

$

(15,476

)

$

165,444

 

 

 

LED & Solar

 

Data Storage

 

Unallocated 
Corporate 
Amount

 

Total

 

As of June 30, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of June 30, 2013

 

LED & Solar

 

Data Storage

 

Unallocated
Corporate

 

Total

 

Goodwill

 

$

55,828

 

$

 

$

 

$

55,828

 

 

$

55,828

 

$

 

$

 

$

55,828

 

Total assets

 

$

285,219

 

$

68,660

 

$

596,096

 

$

949,975

 

 

$

257,030

 

$

39,275

 

$

641,763

 

$

938,068

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

55,828

 

$

 

$

 

$

55,828

 

Total assets

 

$

319,457

 

$

57,203

 

$

559,403

 

$

936,063

 

 

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 corporate total assets were comprised principally of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments.

Note 6—Debt

Mortgage Payable

We have a mortgage payable, with approximately $2.5 million outstanding as of June 30, 2012. The mortgage accrues interest at an annual rate of 7.91%, and the final payment is due on January 1, 2020. The fair value of the mortgage as of June 30, 2012 was approximately $2.7 million.

Convertible Notes

During the first quarter of 2011, at the option of the holders, $7.5 million of our convertible notes were tendered for conversion at a price of $45.95 per share in a net share settlement. We paid the principal amount of $7.5

As of December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

55,828

 

$

 

$

 

$

55,828

 

Total assets

 

$

276,352

 

$

38,664

 

$

622,288

 

$

937,304

 

 

1416



Table of Contents

 

million in cash and issued 111,318 shares of our common stock. We recorded a loss on extinguishment totaling $0.3 million related to these transactions.

During the second quarter of 2011, we issued a notice of redemption on the remaining outstanding principal balance of notes outstanding. As a result, at the option of the holders, the notes were tendered for conversion at a price of $50.59 per share, calculated as defined in the indenture relating to the notes, in a net share settlement. As a result, we paid the principal amount of $98.1 million in cash and issued 1,660,095 shares of our common stock. We recorded a loss on extinguishment totaling $3.0 million related to these transactions.

Note 7—5— Fair Value Measurements

 

We have categorized our assets and liabilities recorded at fair value based upon the fair value hierarchy. The levels of fair value hierarchy are as follows:

 

·                  Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access.

·                  Level 2 inputs utilize other-than-quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

·                  Level 3 inputs are unobservable and are typically based on our own assumptions, including situations where there is little, if any, market activity.

 

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, we categorize such assets or liabilities based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset.

 

Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of positions that are classified within the Level 3 category. As a result, the unrealized gains and losses for assets within the Level 3 category presented below may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable (e.g., changes in market interest rates) and unobservable (e.g., changes in historical company data) inputs.

 

The major categories of assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis, at fair value, as of June 30, 20122013 and December 31, 2011,2012, are as follows (in millionsthousands):

 

 

 

June 30, 2012

 

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Treasury bills

 

$

117.1

 

$

83.8

 

$

 

$

200.9

 

FDIC insured corporate bonds

 

61.0

 

 

 

61.0

 

Government Agency Securities

 

43.7

 

106.3

 

 

150.0

 

Total

 

$

221.8

 

$

190.1

 

$

 

$

411.9

 

 

 

June 30, 2013

 

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

United States treasuries

 

$

206,061

 

$

 

$

 

$

206,061

 

Commercial paper

 

 

4,000

 

 

4,000

 

Corporate bonds

 

 

75,628

 

 

75,628

 

Government agency securities

 

 

86,440

 

 

86,440

 

Total

 

$

206,061

 

$

166,068

 

$

 

$

372,129

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Treasury bills

 

$

70.2

 

$

20.0

 

$

 

$

90.2

 

FDIC insured corporate bonds

 

114.8

 

 

 

114.8

 

Government Agency Securities

 

88.6

 

81.2

 

 

169.8

 

Money market instruments

 

 

0.2

 

 

0.2

 

Total

 

$

273.6

 

$

101.4

 

$

 

$

375.0

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

United States treasuries

 

$

278,698

 

$

 

$

 

$

278,698

 

Government agency securities

 

 

123,054

 

 

123,054

 

Total

 

$

278,698

 

$

123,054

 

$

 

$

401,752

 

Consistent with Level 1 measurement principles, treasury bills and treasury notes are priced using active market prices of identical securities. Consistent with Level 2 measurement principles, commercial paper, corporate bonds and government agency securities are priced with matrix pricing.

 

Government agency securities and treasury bills that are classified as cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates market value. Accordingly, no gains or losses (realized/unrealized) have been incurred for cash equivalents. All investments classified as available-for-sale contain quoted pricesare recorded at fair value within short-term investments in active markets.the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

1517



Table of Contents

 

The major categories of assets and liabilities measured on a nonrecurring basis, atIn determining the fair value as of June 30, 2012its investments and December 31, 2011, are as follows (levels, the Company uses pricing information from pricing services that value securities based on quoted market prices in millions):active markets and matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is a mathematical valuation technique that does not rely exclusively on quoted prices of specific investments, but on the investment’s relationship to other benchmarked quoted securities. The Company has a challenge process in place for investment valuations to facilitate identification and resolution of potentially erroneous prices. The Company reviews the information provided by the third-party service provider to record the fair value of its portfolio.

 

 

June 30, 2012

 

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Property,plant and equipment, net

 

$

 

$

 

$

97.1

 

$

97.1

 

Goodwill

 

 

 

55.8

 

55.8

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

 

23.5

 

23.5

 

Total

 

$

 

$

 

$

176.4

 

$

176.4

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

 

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Property,plant and equipment, net

 

$

 

$

 

$

86.1

 

$

86.1

 

Goodwill

 

 

 

55.8

 

55.8

 

Intangible assets, net

 

 

 

25.9

 

25.9

 

Total

 

$

 

$

 

$

167.8

 

$

167.8

 

 

Note 86Business CombinationDerivative Financial Instruments

 

On April 4, 2011,We use derivative financial instruments to minimize the impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes on earnings and cash flows. In the normal course of business, our operations are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. In order to reduce the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on short-term foreign currency-denominated intercompany transactions and other known foreign currency exposures, we purchased a privately-held company which supplies certain componentsenter into monthly forward contracts. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Our forward contracts are not expected to subject us to material risks due to exchange rate movements because gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset exchange gains and losses on the underlying assets and liabilities. We have not designated these economic hedges as accounting hedges pursuant to the accounting guidance. The forward contracts are marked-to-market through earnings. We conduct our business for $28.3 millionderivative transactions with highly rated financial institutions in cash. As a result of this purchase, we acquired $16.4 million of definite-lived intangibles, of which $13.6 million relatedan effort to core technology, and $15.1 million of goodwill.mitigate any material counterparty risk. The financial results of this acquisitionfollowing tables are included in our LED & Solar segment as of the acquisition date.thousands:

June 30, 2013

 

Not Designated as Hedges under ASC 815 

 

Component of

 

Maturity
 Dates

 

Notional
Amount

 

Fair
Value

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

July 2013

 

3,300

 

32

 

Total Derivative Instruments

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,300

 

$

32

 

December 31, 2012

 

Not Designated as Hedges under ASC 815 

 

Component of

 

Maturity
 Dates

 

Notional
Amount

 

Fair
Value

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

January 2013

 

9,590

 

244

 

Total Derivative Instruments

 

 

 

 

 

$

9,590

 

$

244

 

 

 

Location of Realized Net
(Loss) Gain and Changes in

 

For the three months
ended June 30,

 

For the six months
ended June 30,

 

Derivative 

 

the Fair Value of Derivatives

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

Other, net

 

$

(71

)

$

(158

)

$

157

 

$

(78

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average notional amount of derivatives outstanding

 

 

 

$

1,360

 

$

2,560

 

$

1,994

 

$

2,501

 

 

1618



Table of Contents

Note 7— Commitments, Contingencies and Other Matters

Restructuring and Other Charges

During the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, we took measures to improve profitability, including a reduction of discretionary expenses, realignment of our senior management team and consolidation of certain sales, business and administrative functions. As a result of these actions, we recorded a restructuring charge of $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively. We did not record any restructuring charges during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012.

 

 

For the six months ended

 

 

 

June 30,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Personnel severance and related costs

 

$

435

 

$

63

 

Other associated costs

 

96

 

 

 

 

$

531

 

$

63

 

Restructuring Liability

The following is a reconciliation of the restructuring liability through June 30, 2013 (in thousands):

 

 

LED & Solar

 

Data Storage

 

Unallocated
Corporate

 

Total

 

Short-term liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of January 1, 2013

 

$

448

 

$

1,308

 

$

119

 

$

1,875

 

Restructuring

 

422

 

51

 

58

 

531

 

Cash payments

 

(805

)

(926

)

(166

)

(1,897

)

Balance as of June 30, 2013

 

$

65

 

$

433

 

$

11

 

$

509

 

The balance of the short-term liability will be paid over the next 12 months.

The following is a reconciliation of the restructuring liability through December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

 

 

LED & Solar

 

Data Storage

 

Unallocated
Corporate

 

Total

 

Short-term liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of January 1, 2012

 

$

534

 

$

128

 

$

294

 

$

956

 

Restructuring

 

874

 

1,684

 

135

 

2,693

 

Cash payments

 

(960

)

(504

)

(310

)

(1,774

)

Balance as of December 31, 2012

 

$

448

 

$

1,308

 

$

119

 

$

1,875

 

Note 8— Subsequent Events

Notice of Potential De-Listing: During our internal control evaluation and accounting review, we were unable to timely file our periodic statements with the SEC and, as of the date of this Report, have yet to become current with all our required filings. We have been notified by the NASDAQ Stock Market that our common stock listing will be suspended if we have not filed all of our outstanding periodic reports with the SEC on or before November 4, 2013. If our stock is delisted, then it will no longer be traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, however, it would continue to trade in the over-the-counter market, which may have an adverse effect on the trading price of our stock.

19


Table of Contents

Acquisition of Synos Technology, Inc. (“Synos”): On October 1, 2013, we acquired Synos, which designs and manufactures Fast Array Scanning™ Atomic Layer Deposition systems (“ALD”) that are enabling the production of flexible organic light-emitting diode (“OLED”) displays for mobile devices. The initial purchase price is $70 million. The agreement also includes an earn-out feature that would require an additional payment of up to $115 million if future performance milestones are achieved prior to December 31, 2014. With the earn-out feature, the total maximum potential purchase price is $185 million. Synos is headquartered in Fremont, California and has approximately 50 employees. Preliminary purchase accounting allocations for Synos are not yet available.

 

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.Operations

 

Executive Summary

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “Veeco,”“Veeco”, the “Company” or, “we”), “us”, and “our”, unless the context indicates otherwise) creates Process Equipment solutions that enableenables technologies for a cleaner and more productive world. We design, manufacture and market equipment primarily sold to make light emitting diodes (“LEDs”)LED”s) and hard-disk drives, as well as for emerging applications such as concentrator photovoltaics, power semiconductors, wireless components, microelectromechanicaland micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS), and other next-generation devices.(“MEMS”).

 

Veeco focuses on developingdevelops highly differentiated, “best-in-class” Process Equipment products for critical performance steps. Our products feature leading technology, low cost-of-ownership and high throughput, offering a time-to-market advantage for our customers around the globe.throughput. Core competencies in advanced thin film technologies, over 200 patents, and decades of specialized process know-how helps us to stay at the forefront of these demanding industries.

 

Veeco’s LED & Solar segment designs and manufactures metal organic chemical vapor deposition (“MOCVD”) and molecular beam epitaxy (“MBE”) systems and components sold to manufacturers of LEDs, wireless devices,components, power semiconductors, and concentrator photovoltaics, as well as forto R&D applications. In 2011, we discontinued the sale of our products related to Copper, Indium, Gallium, Selenide (“CIGS”) solar systems technology.

 

Veeco’s Data Storage segment designs and manufactures the critical technologiessystems used to create thin film magnetic heads (“TFMHs”)TFMH”s) that read and write data on hard disk drives. These technologies include ion beam etch, (IBE), ion beam deposition, (IBD), diamond-like carbon, (DLC), physical vapor deposition, (PVD), chemical vapor deposition, (CVD), and slicing, dicing and lapping systems. These technologiesWhile our systems are primarily sold to customers in hard drive MEMS,customers, they also have applications in optical coatings, MEMS and other markets.magnetic sensors, and extreme ultraviolet (“EUV”) lithography.

 

As of September 30, 2013, Veeco’s approximately 900780 employees support our customers through product and process development, training, manufacturing, and sales and service sites in the U.S., South Korea, Taiwan, China, Singapore, Japan, Europe and other locations.

 

Veeco Instruments was organized as a Delaware corporation in 1989.

Highlights of the Second Quarter of 20122013

 

·                  Revenue was $136.5$97.4 million, a 48%28.6% decrease from the second quarter of 2011.2012.

·                  Bookings were $102.5$84.8 million, a 67%17.3% decrease from the second quarter of 2011.2012.

·                  Net (loss) income from continuing operations was $11.0$(4.1) million, or $0.28$(0.11) per share, compared to $56.3$11.0 million, or $1.31$0.28 per share, in the second quarter of 2011.2012.

·                  Gross margins were 44.9%35.6%, compared to 51.1%44.9% in the second quarter of 2011.2012.

 

Third Quarter and Second Half 2012 Outlook

Veeco’s third quarter 2012 revenue is currently forecasted to be between $120 million and $140 million. Earnings per share are currently forecasted to be between $0.12 to $0.29 on a GAAP basis. At the midpoint of the year, we are tightening our 2012 revenue guidance to between $520 and $560 million.

While MOCVD bookings have stabilized, we have not yet seen a clear inflection in customer buying patterns.  LED customers remain cautious about capacity investment plans and it remains unclear when the MOCVD market will recover. Some positive signs are emerging, including increasing tool utilization rates in Korea, Taiwan and China, and continuing customer quoting activity.  Veeco’s Data Storage and MBE businesses also do not appear to be immune to the macro-economic sluggishness, with orders falling sequentially from the first quarter of 2012 to the second quarter.

Assuming macro-economic conditions do not worsen, we currently anticipate a gradual order recovery in the second half of 2012. Veeco is focused on keeping our infrastructure lean and discretionary costs low, while at the same time developing next-generation technology solutions to drive future growth.

Overall, we are seeing positive trends in LED lighting — lower prices, more LED lamp products, and heightened consumer awareness.  LED manufacturers are focused on how to position their businesses for growth as

1720



Table of Contents

 

LEDs becomeOutlook

Through the dominant lighting technology.first nine months of 2013, we have not seen any clear signs that customer overcapacity in our MOCVD business and weak end-market demand in our Data Storage segment will improve in the near term.  Our customers continue to guard spending tightly and limit capacity expansions.  The LED industry is still in an equipment digestion period and near term visibility remains limited. With few MOCVD deals available, we have also experienced increased pricing pressure.  In our Data Storage segment, our hard drive customers are experiencing weak end-market demand which has resulted in excess manufacturing capacity, therefore they are only making select technology purchases.  While our overall bookings have continued to decline in 2013, bookings in our Data Storage segment have been relatively flat for the first nine months of 2013 compared to the first nine months of 2012.

While the Company has been actively working to reduce costs during this extended business downturn, pricing pressure and persistent low volumes in MOCVD represent significant headwinds and have caused the Company to move to a loss in 2013.

 

Our outlook discussion above constitutes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our expectations regarding future results are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated. Risks associated with our ability to achieve these results are set forth in Items 1, 1A, 3, 7 and 7A in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, as well as any modifications or revisions to risk factors contained in our subsequent filings with the SEC.

 

You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates they are made.

 

18



Table of Contents

Results of Operations:

 

Three Months Ended June 30, 20122013 and 20112012

 

Consistent with prior years, we report interim quarters, other than fourth quarters which always end on December 31, on a 13-week basis ending on the last Sunday within such period. The interim quarter ends are determined at the beginning of each year based on the 13-week quarters. The 2013 interim quarter ends were March 31, June 30 and September 29. The 2012 interim quarter ends are April 1, July 1 and September 30. The 2011 interim quarter ends were April 3, July 3 and October 2. For ease of reference, we report these interim quarter ends as March 31, June 30, and September 30 in our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

The following table shows our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income,Operations, percentages of sales, and comparisons between the three months ended June 30, 20122013 and 20112012 (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dollar and

 

 

 

Three months ended

 

Percentage

 

 

 

June 30,

 

Change

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Period to Period

 

Net sales

 

$

136,547

 

100.0

%

$

264,815

 

100.0

%

$

(128,268

)

(48.4

)%

Cost of sales

 

75,293

 

55.1

 

129,466

 

48.9

 

(54,173

)

(41.8

)

Gross profit

 

61,254

 

44.9

 

135,349

 

51.1

 

(74,095

)

(54.7

)

Operating expenses (income):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

20,893

 

15.3

 

27,461

 

10.4

 

(6,568

)

(23.9

)

Research and development

 

23,910

 

17.5

 

23,652

 

8.9

 

258

 

1.1

 

Amortization

 

1,185

 

0.9

 

1,334

 

0.5

 

(149

)

(11.2

)

Other, net

 

146

 

0.1

 

(68

)

(0.0

)

214

 

*

 

Total operating expenses

 

46,134

 

33.8

 

52,379

 

19.8

 

(6,245

)

(11.9

)

Operating income

 

15,120

 

11.1

 

82,970

 

31.3

 

(67,850

)

(81.8

)

Interest (income) expense, net

 

(329

)

(0.2

)

86

 

0.0

 

(415

)

*

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

3,045

 

1.1

 

(3,045

)

(100.0

)

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

15,449

 

11.3

 

79,839

 

30.1

 

(64,390

)

(80.6

)

Income tax provision

 

4,438

 

3.3

 

23,521

 

8.9

 

(19,083

)

(81.1

)

Income from continuing operations

 

11,011

 

8.1

 

56,318

 

21.3

 

(45,307

)

(80.4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

1,219

 

0.9

 

(59,698

)

(22.5

)

60,917

 

*

 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

412

 

0.3

 

(22,586

)

(8.5

)

22,998

 

*

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

807

 

0.6

 

(37,112

)

(14.0

)

37,919

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

11,818

 

8.7

%

$

19,206

 

7.3

%

$

(7,388

)

(38.5

)%

21


Table of Contents

 

 

Three months ended

 

Dollar and Percentage

 

 

 

June 30,

 

Change

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Period to Period

 

Net sales

 

$

97,435

 

100.0

%

$

136,547

 

100.0

%

$

(39,112

)

(28.6

)%

Cost of sales

 

62,795

 

64.4

 

75,293

 

55.1

 

(12,498

)

(16.6

)

Gross profit

 

34,640

 

35.6

 

61,254

 

44.9

 

(26,614

)

(43.4

)

Operating expenses (income):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

19,779

 

20.3

 

20,893

 

15.3

 

(1,114

)

(5.3

)

Research and development

 

20,870

 

21.4

 

23,910

 

17.5

 

(3,040

)

(12.7

)

Amortization

 

855

 

0.9

 

1,185

 

0.9

 

(330

)

(27.8

)

Other, net

 

(52

)

(0.1

)

146

 

0.1

 

(198

)

 

*

Total operating expenses

 

41,452

 

42.5

 

46,134

 

33.8

 

(4,682

)

(10.1

)

Operating (loss) income

 

(6,812

)

(7.0

)

15,120

 

11.1

 

(21,932

)

 

*

Interest income, net

 

236

 

0.2

 

329

 

0.2

 

(93

)

(28.3

)

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

(6,576

)

(6.7

)

15,449

 

11.3

 

(22,025

)

 

*

Income tax (benefit) provision

 

(2,495

)

(2.6

)

4,438

 

3.3

 

(6,933

)

 

*

(Loss) income from continuing operations

 

(4,081

)

(4.2

)

11,011

 

8.1

 

(15,092

)

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

 

 

1,219

 

0.9

 

(1,219

)

 

*

Income tax provision

 

 

 

412

 

0.3

 

(412

)

 

*

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

 

807

 

0.6

 

(807

)

 

*

Net (loss) income

 

$

(4,081

)

(4.2

)%

$

11,818

 

8.7

%

$

(15,899

)

 

*

 


* Not Meaningful

 

Net Sales and Bookings

 

Net sales of $136.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 were down 48.4% compared to the prior year period. The following is an analysis of net sales by segment and by region (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Net Sales

 

 

Three months ended

 

Dollar and 

 

 

Sales

 

Dollar and

 

 

June 30,

 

Percentage Change

 

 

Three months ended June 30,

 

Percentage Change

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Period to Period

 

 

2013

 

Percent of Total

 

2012

 

Percent of Total

 

Period to Period

 

Segment Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LED & Solar

 

$

86,778

 

$

219,135

 

$

(132,357

)

(60.4

)%

 

$

75,933

 

77.9

%

$

86,778

 

63.6

%

$

(10,845

)

(12.5

)%

Data Storage

 

49,769

 

45,680

 

4,089

 

9.0

 

 

21,502

 

22.1

%

49,769

 

36.4

%

(28,267

)

(56.8

)%

Total

 

$

136,547

 

$

264,815

 

$

(128,268

)

(48.4

)%

 

$

97,435

 

100.0

%

$

136,547

 

100.0

%

$

(39,112

)

(28.6

)%

Regional Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

$

23,815

 

$

32,391

 

$

(8,576

)

(26.5

)%

 

$

12,644

 

13.0

%

$

23,815

 

17.4

%

$

(11,171

)

(46.9

)%

Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”)

 

12,573

 

20,955

 

(8,382

)

(40.0

)

Asia Pacific (“APAC”)

 

100,159

 

211,469

 

(111,310

)

(52.6

)

Europe, Middle East and Africa

 

6,930

 

7.1

%

12,573

 

9.2

%

(5,643

)

(44.9

)%

Asia Pacific

 

77,861

 

79.9

%

100,159

 

73.4

%

(22,298

)

(22.3

)%

Total

 

$

136,547

 

$

264,815

 

$

(128,268

)

(48.4

)%

 

$

97,435

 

100.0

%

$

136,547

 

100.0

%

$

(39,112

)

(28.6

)%

 

By segment,22


Table of Contents

Our LED & Solar segment sales decreased 60.4% in 20122013 primarily due to a 64.3% decrease in MOCVD reactor shipments from the prior year period as a result of industry overcapacity following over two years of strong customer investments.  Our Data Storage sales increased 9.0%, primarily as a result of an increasedecreased in shipments2013 due to data

19



Table of Contents

storage customers to replace equipment destroyed by flooding in customer facilities in Thailand. LED & Solar sales represented 63.6% of total sales for the three months ended June 30, 2012, down from 82.8% in the prior year.fabrication facility overcapacity and weak hard drive demand.  Our Data Storage sales accounted for 36.4%in 2012 were favorably impacted by the replacement of net sales, up from 17.2%equipment at one of our customer’s site that was damaged by the floods in the prior year period.Thailand.  By region, net sales decreased by 52.6% in Asia Pacific, primarily due to a significant decrease in MOCVD sales in China.China resulting from industry overcapacity. Net sales in the Americas (less than 1% is outside U.S.) and EMEAEurope, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”) also decreased, 26.5% and 40.0%, respectively.due to reduced end-market demand resulting from the weak global economy. We believe that there will continue to be period-to-period variations in the geographic distribution of sales.

 

Bookings decreased 67.0% compared17.3% to $84.8 million from $102.5 million in the prior year period, primarily attributable to a 71.7%24.8% decrease in LED & Solar bookings, that was principally driven by a decline in MOCVD bookings from the prior year period due to industry overcapacity. AfterSince hitting a peak in second quarter of 2011, Veeco’s bookings have slowed dramatically in the second half of 2011 which continued throughout the first half of 2012.dramatically. Data Storage bookings decreased 32.8%increased 5.7% from the prior year period. Customers remain hesitant to make further investments as customer consolidation activity continuedend-user hard drive demand has slowed. We continue to temporarily stall capacity investments.experience weak overall market conditions due to overcapacity in all of our businesses.

 

Our book-to-bill ratio for the three months ended June 30, 2012,2013, which is calculated by dividing bookings recorded in a given time period by revenue recognized in the same time period, was 0.75.87 to 1. Our backlog as of June 30, 20122013 was $240.8$140.6 million, compared to $332.9$150.2 million as of December 31, 2011.2012. During the three months ended June 30, 2012,2013, we recorded backlog adjustments of approximately $30.4$3.4 million related principally to orders that no longer met our booking criteria. Our backlog consists of orders for which we received a firm purchase order, a customer-confirmed shipment date within twelve months and a deposit, where required. As of June 30, 2012,2013, we had customer deposits and advanced billings of $52.0$27.4 million.

 

Gross Profit

 

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales,in dollars and gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2012, was 44.9%, compared to 51.1%periods indicated were as follows (dollars in the prior year period. thousands):

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Period to Period

 

Gross profit - LED & Solar

 

$

26,349

 

$

37,077

 

$

(10,728

)

(28.9

)%

Gross margin

 

34.7

%

42.7

%

 

 

 

 

Gross profit - Data Storage

 

$

8,291

 

$

24,177

 

$

(15,886

)

(65.7

)%

Gross margin

 

38.6

%

48.6

%

 

 

 

 

Gross profit - Total Veeco

 

$

34,640

 

$

61,254

 

$

(26,614

)

(43.4

)%

Gross margin

 

35.6

%

44.9

%

 

 

 

 

LED & Solar gross margins decreased to 42.7% from 51.2% primarily resulting from decreased sales volume,due to lower average selling priceprices and unfavorable product mix,fewer final acceptances partially offset by productlower plant and service spending associated with reduced volumes and cost reductions. In thisreductions in response to lower business levels.  We anticipate a continuing weak business environment we anticipate continued averageresulting in persistent selling price pressure in our MOCVD business.  Data Storage gross margins decreased primarily due to 48.6% from 50.5%, driven primarilya significant reduction in volume and a sales mix of lower margin products partially offset by an unfavorable product mix.reduced plant and service spending.

 

OperatingSelling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the periods indicated were as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Period to Period

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

$

19,779

 

$

20,893

 

$

(1,114

)

(5.3

)%

Percent of sales

 

20.3

%

15.3

%

 

 

 

 

23


Table of Contents

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $6.6 million or 23.9%, from the prior year period primarily as a result of a reduction in bonus and profit sharing and commission expense from the reduced level of business in each of our segments and cost controlscontrol measures put ininto place in response to declining sales. Selling, generalweak market conditions resulting in lower personnel-related costs and administrativeother discretionary expenses.  These reductions were partially offset by professional fees associated with our accounting review.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses for the periods indicated were 15.3% of net sales, compared with 10.4% of net salesas follows (dollars in the prior year period.thousands):

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Period to Period

 

Research and development

 

$

20,870

 

$

23,910

 

$

(3,040

)

(12.7

)%

Percent of sales

 

21.4

%

17.5

%

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development expense increased $0.3 million or 1.1% from the prior year period,decreased as the company continues its focusCompany strategically focuses on product development in areas of high-growth for future end marketend-market opportunities in our LED & Solar segment. As a percentage of net sales, research and development expense increased to 17.5% from 8.9% in the prior year period.

 

Income Taxes

Income tax (benefit) provision for the periods indicated were as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Period to Period

 

Income tax (benefit) provision

 

$

(2,495

)

$

4,438

 

$

(6,933

)

*

Effective tax rate

 

(37.9

)%

28.7

%

 

 

 


* Not Meaningful

 

Our provision for income taxes consists of U.S. federal, state and local and foreign taxes in amounts necessary to align our quarter-to-dateyear-to-date tax provision with the effective tax rate we expect to achieve for the full year.

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, the Company had an effective tax benefit rate of 37.9% and recorded an income tax benefit of $2.5 million from continuing operations. The tax benefit rate was higher than the statutory tax rate primarily due to tax rate differences in the foreign jurisdictions in which the Company operates and an income tax benefit related to the generation of current year research and development tax credits.

 

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company had an effective tax rate of 28.7% and recorded a provision for income taxes of $4.4 million from continuing operations. The effective tax rate was lower than the statutory tax rate primarily due to tax rate differences in the foreign jurisdictions in which the Company operates and an income tax benefit related to the manufacturer’s deduction under IRC Section 199. The reduction in the effective tax rate in 2012 compared to 2011 was due to a higher portion of earnings being generated in foreign jurisdictions. A further reduction in the effective tax rate in 2012 compared to 2011 may result from the potential extension of the federal research and development tax credit which expired December 31, 2011.

For the three months ended June 30, 2011, the Company had an effective tax rate of 29.5% and recorded a provision for income taxes of $23.5 million from continuing operations. The effective tax rate was lower than the statutory tax rate primarily due to tax rate differences in the foreign jurisdictions in which the Company operates, the generation of research and development tax credits and an income tax benefit related to the manufacturer’s deduction under IRC Section 199.

 

2024



Table of Contents

 

Discontinued Operations

 

Discontinued operations results for the periods indicated were as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Three months ended

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Period to Period

 

Income from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

$

 

$

1,219

 

$

(1,219

)

*

Income tax provision

 

 

412

 

(412

)

*

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

 

$

807

 

$

(807

)

*


* Not Meaningful

Discontinued operations represent the results of the operations of our disposed CIGS solar systems business which was discontinued on September 27, 2011 as well as our Metrology business, which was disposed of in 2010. The three months ended June 30, 2012 included a $1.4 million gain on the sale of the assets of discontinued segment held for sale. The three

Six months ended June 30, 2011, included the results of operations of our discontinued CIGS solar systems business.

Six Months Ended June 30,2013 and 2012 and 2011

 

The following table shows our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income,Operations, percentages of sales, and comparisons between the six months ended June 30, 20122013 and 20112012 (dollars in thousands):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dollar and

 

 

Six months ended

 

Percentage

 

 

Six months ended

 

Dollar and Percentage

 

 

June 30,

 

Change

 

 

June 30,

 

Change

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Period to Period

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Period to Period

 

Net sales

 

$

276,456

 

100.0

%

$

519,491

 

100.0

%

$

(243,035

)

(46.8

)%

 

$

159,216

 

100.0

%

$

276,456

 

100.0

%

$

(117,240

)

(42.4

)%

Cost of sales

 

149,934

 

54.2

 

253,179

 

48.7

 

(103,245

)

(40.8

)

 

102,024

 

64.1

 

149,934

 

54.2

 

(47,910

)

(32.0

)

Gross profit

 

126,522

 

45.8

 

266,312

 

51.3

 

(139,790

)

(52.5

)

 

57,192

 

35.9

 

126,522

 

45.8

 

(69,330

)

(54.8

)

Operating expenses (income):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

40,666

 

14.7

 

50,397

 

9.7

 

(9,731

)

(19.3

)

 

39,427

 

24.8

 

40,666

 

14.7

 

(1,239

)

(3.0

)

Research and development

 

47,216

 

17.1

 

43,523

 

8.4

 

3,693

 

8.5

 

 

41,607

 

26.1

 

47,216

 

17.1

 

(5,609

)

(11.9

)

Amortization

 

2,400

 

0.9

 

2,242

 

0.4

 

158

 

7.0

 

 

1,711

 

1.1

 

2,400

 

0.9

 

(689

)

(28.7

)

Restructuring

 

63

 

0.0

 

 

 

63

 

*

 

 

531

 

0.3

 

63

 

0.0

 

468

 

 

*

Other, net

 

111

 

0.0

 

(28

)

(0.0

)

139

 

*

 

 

352

 

0.2

 

111

 

0.0

 

241

 

 

*

Total operating expenses

 

90,456

 

32.7

 

96,134

 

18.5

 

(5,678

)

(5.9

)

 

83,628

 

52.5

 

90,456

 

32.7

 

(6,828

)

(7.5

)

Operating income

 

36,066

 

13.0

 

170,178

 

32.8

 

(134,112

)

(78.8

)

Interest expense, net

 

(532

)

(0.2

)

1,385

 

0.3

 

(1,917

)

*

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

3,349

 

0.6

 

(3,349

)

(100.0

)

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

36,598

 

13.2

 

165,444

 

31.8

 

(128,846

)

(77.9

)

Income tax provision

 

9,125

 

3.3

 

51,147

 

9.8

 

(42,022

)

(82.2

)

Income from continuing operations

 

27,473

 

9.9

 

114,297

 

22.0

 

(86,824

)

(76.0

)

Operating (loss) income

 

(26,436

)

(16.6

)

36,066

 

13.0

 

(62,502

)

 

*

Interest income, net

 

428

 

0.3

 

532

 

0.2

 

(104

)

(19.5

)

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

(26,008

)

(16.3

)

36,598

 

13.2

 

(62,606

)

 

*

Income tax (benefit) provision

 

(11,856

)

(7.4

)

9,125

 

3.3

 

(20,981

)

 

*

(Loss) income from continuing operations

 

(14,152

)

(8.9

)

27,473

 

9.9

 

(41,625

)

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

1,138

 

0.4

 

(67,735

)

(13.0

)

68,873

 

*

 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

381

 

0.1

 

(25,286

)

(4.9

)

25,667

 

*

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

757

 

0.3

 

(42,449

)

(8.2

)

43,206

 

*

 

Income from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

 

0.0

 

1,138

 

0.4

 

(1,138

)

 

*

Income tax provision

 

 

0.0

 

381

 

0.1

 

(381

)

 

*

Income from discontinued operations

 

 

0.0

 

757

 

0.3

 

(757

)

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

28,230

 

10.2

%

$

71,848

 

13.8

%

$

(43,618

)

(60.7

)%

Net (loss) income

 

$

(14,152

)

(8.9

)%

$

28,230

 

10.2

%

$

(42,382

)

 

*

 


* Not Meaningful

25


Table of Contents

 

Net Sales and Bookings

 

Net sales of $276.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were down 46.8% compared to the prior year period. The following is an analysis of net sales by segment and by region (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Net Sales

 

 

Sales

 

 

Six months ended

 

Dollar and 

 

 

For the six months ended

 

Dollar and Percentage

 

 

June 30,

 

Percentage Change

 

 

June 30,

 

Change

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Period to Period

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Period to Period

 

Segment Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LED & Solar

 

$

182,352

 

$

433,833

 

$

(251,481

)

(58.0

)%

 

$

118,240

 

$

182,352

 

$

(64,112

)

(35.2

)%

Data Storage

 

94,104

 

85,658

 

8,446

 

9.9

 

 

40,976

 

94,104

 

(53,128

)

(56.5

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

276,456

 

$

519,491

 

$

(243,035

)

(46.8

)%

 

$

159,216

 

$

276,456

 

$

(117,240

)

(42.4

)%

Regional Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

$

44,031

 

$

61,645

 

$

(17,614

)

(28.6

)%

 

$

25,077

 

$

44,031

 

$

(18,954

)

(43.0

)%

EMEA

 

17,804

 

36,404

 

(18,600

)

(51.1

)

APAC

 

214,621

 

421,442

 

(206,821

)

(49.1

)

Europe, Middle East and Africa

 

11,480

 

17,804

 

(6,324

)

(35.5

)%

Asia Pacific

 

122,659

 

214,621

 

(91,962

)

(42.8

)%

Total

 

$

276,456

 

$

519,491

 

$

(243,035

)

(46.8

)%

 

$

159,216

 

$

276,456

 

$

(117,240

)

(42.4

)%

 

21



Table of Contents

By segment,Our LED & Solar sales decreased 58.0% in 20122013 primarily due to a 64.7% decrease in MOCVD reactor shipments from the prior year period as a result of industry overcapacity following over two years of strong customer investments. Our Data Storage sales increased 9.9%, primarily as a result of an increasedecreased in shipments2013 due to data storage customers to replace equipment destroyed by flooding in customer facilities in Thailand. LED & Solar sales represented 66.0% of total sales for the six months ended June 30, 2012, down from 83.5% in the prior year.fabrication facility overcapacity and weak hard drive demand. Our Data Storage sales accounted for 34.0%in 2012 were favorably impacted by the replacement of net sales, up from 16.5%equipment at one of our customer’s site that was damaged by the floods in the prior year period.Thailand. By region, net sales decreased by 49.1% in Asia Pacific, primarily due to thea significant decrease in MOCVD sales in China.China resulting from industry overcapacity. Net sales in the Americas and EMEA also decreased, 28.6% and 51.1%, respectively.due to reduced end-market demand resulting from the weak global economy. We believe that there will continue to be period-to-period variations in the geographic distribution of sales.

 

Bookings decreased 60.1% compared28.1% to $155.2 million from $215.9 million in the comparable prior year period, primarily attributable to a 65.7%37.7% decrease in LED & Solar bookings, that was principally driven by a decline in MOCVD bookings from the prior year period due to industry overcapacity. AfterSince hitting a peak in second quarter of 2011, Veeco’s bookings have slowed dramatically in the second half of 2011 which continued throughout the first half of 2012.through 2013. Data Storage bookings decreased 23.0%increased 0.7% from the prior year period. Customers remain hesitant to make further investments as customer consolidation activity continuedend-user hard drive demand has slowed. We continue to temporarily stall capacity investments.experience weak overall market conditions due to overcapacity in all of our businesses.

 

Our book-to-bill ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2012,2013, which is calculated by dividing bookings recorded in a given time period by revenue recognized in the same time period, was 0.78.97 to 1. Our backlog as of June 30, 20122013 was $240.8$140.6 million, compared to $332.9$150.2 million as of December 31, 2011.2012. During the six months ended June 30, 2012,2013, we recorded backlog adjustments of approximately $31.5$5.6 million, consisting of a $4.4 million adjustment related to orders that no longer met our booking criteria. Our backlog consistscriteria as well as an adjustment related to foreign currency translation of orders for which we received a firm purchase order, a customer-confirmed shipment date within twelve months and a deposit, where required.$1.2 million. As of June 30, 2012,2013, we had customer deposits and advanced billings of $52.0$27.4 million.

26


Table of Contents

 

Gross Profit

 

Gross profit as a percentage of net sales,in dollars and gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2012, was 45.8%, compared to 51.3%periods indicated were as follows (dollars in the prior year period. thousands):

 

 

Six months ended

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Period to Period

 

Gross profit - LED & Solar

 

$

40,334

 

$

82,262

 

$

(41,928

)

(51

)%

Gross margin

 

34.1

%

45.1

%

 

 

 

 

Gross profit - Data Storage

 

$

16,858

 

$

44,260

 

$

(27,402

)

(61.9

)%

Gross margin

 

41.1

%

47.0

%

 

 

 

 

Gross profit

 

$

57,192

 

$

126,522

 

$

(69,330

)

(54.8

)%

Gross margin

 

35.9

%

45.8

%

 

 

 

 

LED & Solar gross margins decreased to 45.1% from 51.1% primarily resulting from a significant decrease in sales volume,due to lower average selling priceprices, fewer final acceptances and unfavorable product mix,lower volume, partially offset by productlower plant and service spending associated with reduced volumes and cost reductions. In thisreductions in response to lower business levels. We anticipate a continuing weak business environment we anticipate continued averageresulting in persistent selling price pressure in our MOCVD business.  Data Storage gross margins decreased primarily due to 47.0% from 52.0%, driven primarilya significant reduction in volume and a sales mix of lower margin products partially offset by an unfavorable product mix.reduced plant spending.

 

OperatingSelling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the periods indicated were as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Six months ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Period to Period

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

$

39,427

 

$

40,666

 

$

(1,239

)

(3.0

)%

Percentage of sales

 

24.8

%

14.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $9.7 million or 19.3%, from the prior year period primarily as a result of a reduction in bonus, profit sharing and commission expense from the reduced level of business in each of our segments and cost controlscontrol measures put ininto place in response to declining sales. Selling, generalweak market conditions resulting in lower personnel-related costs and administrativeother discretionary expenses. These reductions were partially offset by professional fees associated with our accounting review.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses for the periods indicated were 14.7% of net sales, compared with 9.7% of net salesas follows (dollars in the prior year period.thousands):

 

 

Six months ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Period to Period

 

Research and development

 

$

41,607

 

$

47,216

 

$

(5,609

)

(11.9

)%

Percentage of sales

 

26.1

%

17.1

%

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development expense increased $3.7 million or 8.5% from the prior year period,decreased as the company continues its focusCompany strategically focuses on product development in areas of high-growth for future end marketend-market opportunities in our LED & Solar segment. As a percentage

27


Table of net sales, research and developmentContents

Restructuring

Restructuring expenses for the periods indicated were as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Six months ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Period to Period

 

Restructuring

 

$

531

 

$

63

 

$

468

 

742.9

%

Percentage of sales

 

0.3

%

0.0

%

 

 

 

 

Restructuring expense increased as we continued to 17.1% from 8.4%take measures to improve profitability in the prior year period.a challenging business environment. The charge consists of personnel severance and related costs.

 

Income Taxes

Income tax (benefit) provision for the periods indicated were as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Six months ended

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Period to Period

 

Income tax (benefit) provision

 

$

(11,856

)

$

9,125

 

$

(20,981

)

 

*

Effective tax rate

 

(45.6

)%

24.9

%

 

 

 

 


* Not Meaningful

 

Our provision for income taxes consists of U.S. federal, state and local and foreign taxes in amounts necessary to align our quarter-to-dateyear-to-date tax provision with the effective tax rate we expect to achieve for the full year.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company had an effective tax benefit rate of 45.6% and recorded a benefit for income taxes of $11.9 million from continuing operations. The tax benefit rate was higher than the statutory tax rate primarily due to tax rate differences in the foreign jurisdictions in which the Company operates, an income tax benefit related to the generation of current year research and development tax credits, and a discrete benefit related to legislation enacted in the first quarter of 2013 which extended the Federal Research and Development Credit for both the 2012 and 2013 tax years.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company had an effective tax rate of 24.9% and recorded a provision for income taxes of $9.1 million from continuing operations. The effective tax rate was lower than the statutory tax rate primarily due to tax rate differences in the foreign jurisdictions in which the Company operates and an income tax benefit related to the manufacturer’s deduction under IRC Section 199. The reduction in the effective tax rate in 2012 compared to 2011 was due to a higher portion of earnings being generated in foreign jurisdictions.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Company had an effective tax rate of 30.9% and recorded a provision for income taxes of $51.1 million from continuing operations. The effective tax rate was lower than the statutory tax rate primarily due to tax rate differences in the foreign jurisdictions in which the Company operates, the generation of research and development tax credits and an income tax benefit related to the manufacturer’s deduction

22



Table of Contents

under IRC Section 199.

 

Discontinued Operations

Discontinued operations results for the periods indicated were as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

Six months ended

 

 

 

 

 

June 30,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Period to Period

 

Income from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

$

 

$

1,138

 

$

(1,138

)

 

*

Income tax provision

 

$

 

$

381

 

$

(381

)

 

*

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

 

$

757

 

$

(757

)

 

*


* Not Meaningful

 

Discontinued operations represent the results of the operations of our disposed CIGS solar systems business which was discontinued on September 27, 2011 as well as our Metrology business, which was disposed of in 2010. The six months ended June 30, 2012, included a $1.4 million gain on the sale of the assets of discontinued segment held for sale. The six months ended June 30, 2011, included the results

28


Table of operations of our discontinued CIGS solar systems business.Contents

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Historically, our principal capital requirements have included the funding of acquisitions, capital expenditures and repayment of debt. We traditionally have generated cash from operations and stock issuances. Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations is dependent on the continued demand for our products and services. A summary of the cash flow activity for the six months ended June 30, 20122013 and 2011,2012, respectively, is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Six months ended
June 30,

 

 

Six months ended
June 30,

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net income

 

$

28,230

 

$

71,848

 

Net (loss) income

 

$

(14,152

)

$

28,230

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

60,551

 

$

75,312

 

 

$

13,751

 

$

60,276

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

37,401

 

(24,755

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

1,688

 

(99,750

)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

(155,035

)

37,676

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(1,693

)

1,688

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

(515

)

1,729

 

 

(32

)

(515

)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

99,125

 

(47,464

)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

(143,009

)

99,125

 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 

217,922

 

245,132

 

 

384,557

 

217,922

 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 

$

317,047

 

$

197,668

 

 

$

241,548

 

$

317,047

 

 

Cash provided by operations forduring the six months ended June 30, 2012 was $60.6 million2013 decreased compared to $75.3the prior year period, primarily driven by the $42.4 million reduction in net (loss) income from the prior year period. Cash provided by operations benefited from a $3.3 million adjustment for non-cash items and a $24.6 million net change in operating assets and liabilities, primarily driven by an $18.1 million reduction in accounts receivable and a $20.9 increase in accounts payable which were partially offset by other operating items.

Cash used in investing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2013 declined by $192.7 million from the prior year period. The decrease was primarily attributable to the Company maintaining a higher short-term investment balance resulting in net purchases of short-term investment of $148.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The $60.62013, compared to net sales of short-term investments of $50.5 million cash provided by operations infrom the current quarter included $13.3 million in adjustments to the $28.2 million of net income for non-cash items. Net cash provided by operations was favorably impacted by a net $19.0 million of changes in operating assets and liabilities, which included a $22.9 million decrease in inventory, an $8.9 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets, a $5.4 million decrease in other assets and a $3.3 million decrease in supplier deposits, partially offset by a $12.5 million decrease in accrued expenses, a $7.8 million decrease in accounts payable and a $1.2 million decrease in income taxes payable. The $75.3 million cash provided by operations in 2011 included $69.3 million in adjustments to the $71.8 million of net income for non-cash items. Net cash provided by operations was unfavorably impacted by a net $65.8 million change in operating assets and liabilities.prior year period.

 

Cash provided by investingused in financing activities of $37.4 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012, consisted primarily of $99.5 million in proceeds from sales of short-term investments and $3.8 million of proceeds from sale of assets from discontinued segment, partially offset2013 declined by $49.0 million of purchases of short-term investments, $16.6 million of capital expenditures and $0.3 million in transfers to restricted cash. Cash used in investing activities of $24.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, consisted primarily of $361.1 million of purchases of short-term investments, $31.3 million of capital expenditures and $28.3 million of payments for net assets of businesses acquired, partially offset by proceeds of $374.2$3.4 million from the sale of short-term investments and $21.7prior year period primarily due to a $1.8 million of transfers from restricted cash.

Cash provided by financing activities of $1.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012, consisted primarily of $2.1 million of proceeds fromreduction in stock option exercisesexercise activity and a $1.0 million excess tax benefits from stock option exercises, partially offset by $1.3 million ofincrease in restricted stock tax withholdings and $0.1 million of repayment of long-term debt. Cash used in financing activities of $99.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, consisted of $105.7 million of repayments of long-term debt, $7.8 million of purchases of treasury stock and $2.7 million of restricted stock tax withholdings, partially offset by $9.1 million of cash proceeds from stock option exercises and $7.3 million excess tax benefits from stock options exercises.withholdings.

 

As of June 30, 2012,2013, restricted cash consists of $0.9$3.4 million which serves as collateral for bank guarantees that provide financial assurance that the Company will fulfill certain customer obligations. This cash is held in custody by the issuing bank, and is restricted as to withdrawal or use while the related bank guarantees are outstanding.

 

23A summary of cash and cash equivalent balances, restricted cash and short term investments is as follows (in thousands):



Table of Contents

 

 

September 30,

 

June 30,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2013

 

2012

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

247,666

 

$

241,548

 

$

384,557

 

Restricted cash

 

2,850

 

3,448

 

2,017

 

Short-term investments

 

322,488

 

340,332

 

192,234

 

Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and short-term investments

 

$

573,004

 

$

585,328

 

$

578,808

 

 

On July 2, 2012,October 1, 2013 we made an additional $10.3utilized $70 million investment in a rapidly developing organic light emitting diode (OLED) equipment company, which resulted in a 12.0% ownership of the company.

foregoing cash balance to close on the Synos Technology, Inc. (“Synos”) acquisition.  We believe that our September 30, 2013 existing cash balances together withand our projected cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our projected working capital and other cash flow requirements for the next twelve months, as well as our contractual obligations.

 

29


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

 

There have been no significant changes to our “Contractual Obligations” table, except for purchase commitments and restructuring, in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our 2011 Annual Report2012 annual report on Form 10-K. TheAs of June 30, 2013, the purchase commitments outstanding at Junewere $65.8 million. As of September 30, 2012 were $87.32013 our purchase commitments have been reduced to $58.6 million. Pursuant to our agreement to acquire Synos, we may be obligated to pay up to an additional $115 million if certain conditions are met. Please see Note 8-Subsequent Events in our consolidated financial statements in this report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”).

 

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

 

General:General

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Management continually monitors and evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible and other long-lived assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring costs, and contingent liabilities, including potential litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We consider certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition, short-term investments, the valuation of inventories, the impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the impairment of long-lived assets, fair value measurements, warranty costs, income taxes and equity-based compensation to be critical policies due to the estimation processes involved in each. We have reclassified certain amounts previously reported in our financial statements to conform to the current presentation, including amounts related to discontinued operations.

 

Revenue Recognition:Recognition

We recognize revenue based on current accounting guidance provided by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). Our revenue transactions include sales of products under multiple-element arrangements. Revenue under these arrangements is allocated to each element based upon its estimated selling price.

We consider a broad array of facts and circumstances when evaluating each of our sales arrangements in determining when to recognize revenue, including specific termsall of the purchase order, contractual obligations to the customer, the complexity of the customer’s post-delivery acceptance provisions, customer creditworthiness and the installation process. Management also considers the party responsible for installation, whether there are process specification requirements which need to be demonstrated before final sign off and payment, whether Veeco can replicate the field testing conditions and procedures in our factory and our past experience with demonstrating and installing a particular system. Sales arrangements are reviewed on a case-by-case basis; however, the Company’s revenue recognition protocol for established systems is as described below.

System revenue is generally recognized upon shipment or delivery provided title and risk of loss has passed to the customer,following criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists with a customer; delivery of the specified products has occurred or services have been rendered; prices are contractually fixed or determinable,determinable; and collectability is reasonably assuredassured.  Revenue is recorded including shipping and there are no material uncertainties regarding customer acceptance.  Revenuehandling costs and excluding applicable taxes related to sales.  A significant portion of our revenue is derived from installation services is recognized at the time acceptance is received from the customer.  If the arrangement does not meet all the above criteria, the entire amount of the sales arrangement is deferred until the criteria have been met or all elements have been delivered to the customer or been completed.

For those transactions on which we recognize systems revenue, either at the time of shipment or delivery, our sales and contractual arrangements with customers do notthat have multiple elements, such as systems, upgrades, components, spare parts, maintenance and service plans. For sales arrangements that contain provisions for rightmultiple elements, we split the arrangement into separate units of return or forfeiture, refund or other purchase price concessions. Inaccounting if the rare instances where such provisions are included, the Company defers all revenue until customer acceptance is achieved. In cases where products are sold with a retention of 10%individually delivered elements have value to 20%, which is typically payable by the customer when installation and field acceptance provisionson a standalone basis. We also evaluate whether multiple transactions with the same customer or related party should be considered part of a multiple element arrangement, whereby we assess, among other factors, whether the contracts or agreements are completed,negotiated or executed within a short time frame of each other or if there are indicators that the customer hascontracts are negotiated in contemplation of each other. When we have separate units of accounting, we allocate revenue to each element based on the right to withhold this payment until such provisions have been achieved. We deferfollowing selling price hierarchy: vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if available; third party evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available; or our best estimate of selling price (“BESP”) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. For the greatermajority of the retention amount or the estimatedelements in our arrangements we utilize BESP. The accounting guidance for selling price of the installation on systems thathierarchy did not include BESP for arrangements entered into prior to January 1, 2011, and as such we recognizerecognized revenue at the time of shipment or delivery.for those arrangements as described below.

 

2430



Table of Contents

 

For new products, new applicationsWe consider many facts when evaluating each of existing products or for products with substantive customerour sales arrangements to determine the timing of revenue recognition, including the contractual obligations, the customer’s creditworthiness and the nature of the customer’s post-delivery acceptance provisions.  Our system sales arrangements, including certain upgrades, generally include field acceptance provisions where performance cannot be fully assessed prior to meeting agreed upon specifications atthat may include functional or mechanical test procedures.  For the customer site, revenue is deferred as deferred profit in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and fully recognized upon completionmajority of installation and receipt of final customer acceptance.

Our systems are principally sold to manufacturers in the HB-LED, the data storage, solar and other industries. Salesour arrangements, for these systems generally include customer acceptance criteria based upon Veeco and/or customer specifications. Prior to shipment a customer source inspection of the system is performed in our facility or test data is sent to the customer documenting that the system is functioning withinto the agreed upon specifications. Suchspecifications prior to delivery.  Historically, such source inspection or test data replicates the field acceptance testingprovisions that will be performed at the customer’s site prior to final acceptance of the system.  CustomerAs such, we objectively demonstrate that the criteria specified in the contractual acceptance provisions include reassemblyare achieved prior to delivery and, installationtherefore, we recognize revenue upon delivery since there is no substantive contingency remaining related to the acceptance provisions at that date, subject to the retention amount constraint described below.  For new products, new applications of existing products or for products with substantive customer acceptance provisions where we cannot objectively demonstrate that the criteria specified in the contractual acceptance provisions have been achieved prior to delivery, revenue and the associated costs are deferred and fully recognized upon the receipt of final customer acceptance, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Our system sales arrangements, including certain upgrades, generally do not contain provisions for right of return or forfeiture, refund, or other purchase price concessions.  In the rare instances where such provisions are included, we defer all revenue until such rights expire.  In many cases our products are sold with a billing retention, typically 10% of the system atsales price (the “retention amount”), which is typically payable by the customer site, which includes performing functionalwhen field acceptance provisions are completed.  The amount of revenue recognized upon delivery of a system or mechanical test procedures (i.e. hardware checks, leak testing, gas flow monitoring and quality control checksupgrade is limited to the lower of  i) the amount that is not contingent upon acceptance provisions or ii) the value allocated to the delivered elements, if such sale is part of a multiple-element arrangement.

For transactions entered into prior to January 1, 2011, under the accounting rules for multiple-element arrangements in place at that time, we deferred the greater of the basic featuresretention amount or the relative fair value of the product). Additionally, a material demonstration process may be performed to validateundelivered elements based on VSOE.  When we could not establish VSOE or TPE for all undelivered elements of an arrangement, revenue on the functionalityentire arrangement was deferred until the earlier of the product. Upon meetingpoint when we did have VSOE for all undelivered elements or the agreed upon specifications the customer approves final acceptancedelivery of all elements of the product.arrangement.

 

VeecoOur sales arrangements, including certain upgrades, generally is required to install these products and demonstrate compliance with acceptance tests at the customer’s facility. Such installations typically are not considered complex and theinclude installation.  The installation process is not deemed essential to the functionality of the equipment becausesince it is not complex; that is, it does not involverequire significant changes to the features or capabilities of the equipment or involve building complexelaborate interfaces or connections.connections subsequent to factory acceptance.  We have a demonstrated history of consistently completing such installations in a timely consistent manner and can reliably estimate the costs of such.  In such cases, the test environment at our facilities prior to shipment replicates the customer’s environment. While there are others in the industry with sufficient knowledge about the installation process for our systems as a practical matter, mostactivities.  Most customers engage the Companyus to perform the installation services, although there are other third-party providers with sufficient knowledge who could complete these services.  Based on these factors, we deem the installation of our systems to be inconsequential and perfunctory relative to the system as a whole, and as a result, do not consider such services to be a separate element of the arrangement.  As such, we accrue the cost of the installation at the time of revenue recognition for the system.

 

In Japan, where our contractual terms with customers generally specify title and risk and rewards of loss and title transfersownership transfer upon customer acceptance, revenue is recognized and the customer is billed upon the receipt of written customer acceptance.

 

Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is recognized ratably over the applicable contract term.  Component and spare part revenue isare recognized at the time of shipment or delivery in accordance with the terms of the applicable sales arrangement.

 

Short-Term Investments:Investments

We determine the appropriate balance sheet classification of our investments at the time of purchase and evaluate the classification at each balance sheet date. As part of our cash management program, we maintain a portfolio of marketable securities which are classified as available-for-sale. These securities include FDIC insured corporate bonds, commercial paper, treasury bills, treasury notes and commercial papergovernment agency securities with maturities of greater than three months when purchased in principal amounts that, when aggregated with interest to accrue over the term, will not exceed FDIC limits.months. Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair market value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, included in the determination of comprehensive income (loss) and reported in equity. Net realized gains and losses are included in net income (loss) attributable to Veeco..

31


Table of Contents

 

Inventory Valuation:Valuation

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out method) or market.  On a quarterly basis, management assesses the valuation and recoverability of all inventories, classified as materials (which include raw materials, spare parts and service inventory), work-in-process and finished goods.

Materials inventory is used primarily to support the installed tool base and spare parts sales and is reviewed for excess quantities or obsolescence by comparing on-hand balances to historical usage, and adjusted for current economic conditions and other qualitative factors. Historically, the variability of such estimates has been impacted by customer demand and tool utilization rates.

The work-in-process and finished goods inventory is principally used to support system sales and is reviewed for excess quantities or obsolescence by considering whether on hand inventory would be utilized to fulfill the related backlog. As the Company typically receives deposits for its orders, the variability of this estimate is reduced as customers have a vested interest in the orders they place with the Company. Management also considers qualitative factors such as future product demand based on market outlook, which is based principally upon production requirements resulting from customer purchase orders received with a customer-confirmed shipment date within the next twelve months.  Historically, the variability of these estimates of future product demand has been impacted by backlog cancellations or modifications resulting from unanticipated changes in technology or customer demand.

Following identification of potential excess or obsolete inventory, management evaluates the need to record adjustments for impairment ofwrite down inventory on a quarterly basis. Our policy is to assess the valuation of all inventories, including raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods, and spare parts and other service inventory. Obsolete or slow-moving inventory, based upon historical usage, or inventory in excess of management’s estimated usage for the next 12 month’s requirements is written-downbalances to its estimated market value, if less than its cost.  Inherent in the estimates of market value are management’s estimates related to our future manufacturing schedules, customer demand, technological and/or market obsolescence, possible alternative uses, and ultimate realization of potential excess inventory.  Unanticipated changes in demand for our products may require a write down of inventory that could materially affect our operating results.

 

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset Impairment:Impairment

The Company does not amortize goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite useful lives, but instead tests the balances in these asset accounts for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level. Our policy is to perform this annual impairment test in the fourth quarter, using a measurement date of October 1st, of each fiscal year or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, a historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments, and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets.

 

Pursuant to relevant accounting pronouncementsthe aforementioned guidance we are required to determine if it is appropriate to use the

25



Table of Contents

operating segment, as defined under accounting guidance for segment reporting, as the reporting unit, or one level below the operating segment, depending on whether certain criteria are met. We have identified twofour reporting units that are required to be reviewed for impairment. The four reporting units are aggregated into two segments: the VIBE and Mechanical reporting units which are reported in our Data Storage segment; and the MOCVD and MBE reporting units which are reported in our LED & Solar and Data Storage.segment.  In identifying the reporting units management considered the economic characteristics of operating segments including the products and services provided, production processes, types or classes of customer and product distribution.

 

We perform this impairment test by first comparing the fair value of our reporting units to their respective carrying amount. When determining the estimated fair value of a reporting unit, we utilize a discounted future cash flow approach since reported quoted market prices are not available for our reporting units. Developing the estimate of the discounted future cash flow requires significant judgment and projections of future financial performance. The key assumptions used in developing the discounted future cash flows are the projection of future revenues and expenses, working capital requirements, residual growth rates and the weighted average cost of capital. In developing our financial projections, we consider historical data, current internal estimates and market growth trends. Changes to any of these assumptions could materially change the fair value of the reporting unit. We reconcile the aggregate fair value of our reporting units to the Company’s adjusted market capitalization as a supporting calculation. The adjusted market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the average share price of our common stock for the last ten trading days prior to the measurement date by the number of outstanding common shares and adding a control premium.

 

32


Table of Contents

If the carrying value of the reporting units exceed the fair value we would then compare the implied fair value of our goodwill to the carrying amount in order to determine the amount of the impairment, if any.

Definite-Lived Intangible and Long-Lived Assets:Assets  Intangible

Definite-lived intangible assets consist of purchased technology, customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks, covenants not-to-compete, software licenses and deferred financing costs. Purchased technology consists of the core proprietary manufacturing technologies associated with the products and offerings obtained through acquisition and are initially recorded at fair value. Customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks, and covenants not-to-compete and software licenses that are obtained in an acquisition are initially recorded at fair value andvalue. Other software licenses and deferred financing costs are initially recorded at cost. Intangible assets with definitive useful lives are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives for periods ranging from 2 years to 17 years.

 

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.

 

Long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets with definite useful lives, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, a historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset groups. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flow expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

 

Fair Value Measurements:Measurements

Accounting guidance for our non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities requires that we disclose the type of inputs we use to value our assets and liabilities, based on three categories of inputs as defined in such. Level 1 inputs are quoted, unadjusted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the company has the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. These requirements apply to our long-lived assets, goodwill, cost method investment and intangible assets. We use Level 3 inputs to value all of such assets. The Company primarily applies the market approach for recurring fair value measurements.

 

Warranty Costs:Cost

We estimate the costs that may be incurred under the warranty we provide and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized. Estimated warranty costs are determined by analyzing specific product and historical configuration statistics and regional warranty support costs. Our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and labor costs incurred in correcting product

26



Table of Contents

failures during the warranty period. Unforeseen component failures or exceptional component performance can also result in changes to warranty costs. If actual warranty costs differ substantially from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.

 

33


Table of Contents

Income Taxes:Taxes

As part of the process of preparing our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating the actual current tax expense, together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The carrying value of our deferred tax assets is adjusted by a partial valuation allowance to recognize the extent to which the future tax benefits will be recognized on a more likely than not basis. Our net deferred tax assets consist primarily of net operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and timing differences between the book and tax treatment of inventory, acquired intangible assets and other asset valuations. Realization of these net deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate future taxable income.

 

We record valuation allowances in order to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. In assessing the adequacy of recorded valuation allowances, we consider a variety of factors, including the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, future taxable income and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Under the relevant accounting guidance, factors such as current and previous operating losses are given significantly greater weight than the outlook for future profitability in determining the deferred tax asset carrying value.

 

Relevant accounting guidance addresses the determination of how tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under such guidance, we must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such uncertain tax positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution.

 

Equity-based Compensation: Compensation

The Company grants equity-based awards, such as stock options and restricted stock or restricted stock units, to certain key employees to create a clear and meaningful alignment between compensation and shareholder return and to enable the employees to develop and maintain a stock ownership position.  While the majority of our equity awards feature time-based vesting, performance-based equity awards, which are awarded from time to time to certain key Company executives, vest as a function of performance, and may also be subject to the recipient’s continued employment which also acts as a significant retention incentive.

Equity-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the employee requisite service period. In order to determine the fair value of stock options on the date of grant, we apply the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Inherent in the model are assumptions related to risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, expected stock-price volatility and option life.

 

The risk-free rate assumed in valuing the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s historical and future expectation of dividend payouts. While the risk-free interest rate and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions, typically based on factual data derived from public sources, the expected stock-price volatility and option life assumptions require a level of judgment which make them critical accounting estimates.

 

We use an expected stock-price volatility assumption that is a combination of both historical volatility, calculated based on the daily closing prices of our common stock over a period equal to the expected term of the option and implied volatility, utilizing market data of actively traded options on our common stock, which are obtained from public data sources. We believe that the historical volatility of the price of our common stock over the expected term of the option is a strong indicator of the expected future volatility and that implied volatility takes into consideration market expectations of how future volatility will differ from historical volatility. Accordingly, we believe a combination of both historical and implied volatility provides the best estimate of the future volatility of the market price of our common stock.

 

The expected option term, representing the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, is estimated using a lattice-based model incorporating historical post vest exercise and employee termination behavior.

34


Table of Contents

 

We estimate forfeitures using our historical experience, which is adjusted over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Because of the significant amount of judgment used in these calculations, it is reasonably likely that circumstances may cause the estimate to change.

 

With regard to the weighted-average option life assumption, we consider the exercise behavior of past grants and model the pattern of aggregate exercises.

 

27



TableWe settle the exercise of Contentsstock options with newly issued shares.

With respect to grants of performance based awards, we assess the probability that such performance criteria will be met in order to determine the compensation expense.  Consequently, the compensation expense is recognized straight-line over the vesting period. If that assessment of the probability of the performance condition being met changes, the Company would recognize the impact of the change in estimate in the period of the change. As with the use of any estimate, and owing to the significant judgment used to derive those estimates, actual results may vary.

The Company has elected to treat awards with only service conditions and with graded vesting as one award. Consequently, the total compensation expense is recognized straight-line over the entire vesting period, so long as the compensation cost recognized at any date at least equals the portion of the grant date fair value of the award that is vested at that date.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

Balance Sheet: In December 2011,July 2013, the FASB issued amended guidance related to the Balance Sheet (Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities). This amendmentASU No. 2013-11, “Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” ASU 2013-11 requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. An entity is required to apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods. The amendment should be applied retrospectively. The Company does not believe that this guidance will have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

Comprehensive Income: In December 2011, the FASB issued amended guidance related to Comprehensive Income. In order to defer only those changes in the June amendment (addressed below) that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments, the FASB issued this amendment to supersede certain pending paragraphs in the June amendment. The amendments are being made to allow the FASB time to redeliberate whetherentities to present onan unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward when settlement in this manner is available under the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the components of net income and other comprehensive income for all periods presented. While the FASBtax law. This ASU is considering the operational concerns about the presentation requirements for reclassification adjustments and the needs of financial statement users for additional information about reclassification adjustments, entities should continue to report reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income consistent with the presentation requirements in effect before the June amendment. All other requirements are not affected, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirementseffective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.2013. The adoptionCompany is evaluating the potential impact of this guidance did not have a material impactadoption on the Company’s condensedits consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2011,April 2013, the FASB issued amended guidance relatedASU No. 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.” The objective of ASU 2013-07 is to Comprehensive Income. This amendment allowsclarify when an entity should apply the option to presentliquidation basis of accounting. The update provides principles for the totalrecognition and measurement of comprehensive income,assets and liabilities and requirements for financial statements prepared using the componentsliquidation basis of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entityaccounting. This ASU is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. The amendment eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of equity. The amendments do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The amendment should be applied retrospectively. The amendments are effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.2013. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance did notstandard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements, absent any indications that liquidation is imminent.

In March 2013, the Company’s condensedFASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, “Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity.” This ASU addresses the accounting for the cumulative translation adjustment when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business within a foreign entity. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of this adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

 

Intangibles — Goodwill and Other:In September 2011,February 2013, the FASB, issued amended guidance related to Intangibles—GoodwillASU No. 2013-04, “Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Other: Testing GoodwillSeveral Liability Arrangements for Impairment.which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date.” This ASU addresses the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of certain obligations resulting from joint and several arrangements including debt arrangements, other contractual obligations, and settled litigation and judicial rulings. The amendment is intended to simplify how entities test goodwill for impairment. The amendment permits an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is “more likely than not” that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having a likelihood of more than 50%. This amendmentASU is effective for annualpublic entities for fiscal years, and interim goodwill impairment tests performedperiods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company is evaluating the potential impact of this adoption on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” The ASU requires entities to provide information about significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component and their corresponding effect on net income. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011.2012. The adoption ofCompany adopted this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Fair Value Measurements: In May 2011, the FASB issued amended guidance related to Fair Value Measurements. This amendment represents the converged guidance of the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (the Boards) on fair value measurement. The collective efforts of the Boards and their staffs, reflectedASU in this amendment, have resulted in common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements, including a consistent meaning of the term “fair value.” The Boards have concluded the common requirements will result in greater comparability of fair value measurements presented and disclosed in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. The amendments are to be applied prospectively. The amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.fiscal 2013.

 

2835



Table of Contents

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities”. The ASU clarifies that ordinary trade receivables and certain other receivables are not in the scope of ASU No. 2011-11, “Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities.” Specifically, Update 2011-11 applies only to derivatives, repurchase agreements and reverse purchase agreements, and securities borrowing and securities lending transactions that are either offset in accordance with specific criteria contained in FASB Accounting Standards Codification or subject to a master netting arrangement or similar agreement. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of this standard did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures Aboutabout Market Risk.Risk

 

Our netNet sales to foreign customers represented approximately 82.6%87.0% and 84.1%84.2% of our total net salesrevenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012,2013, respectively, and 87.8%82.6% and 88.1%84.1% for the comparable 20112012 periods. We expect that net sales to foreign customers will continue to represent a large percentage of our total net sales. Our net sales denominated in foreign currencies represented approximately 1.5%3.1% and 2.1%3.4% of our total net sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 20122013  respectively, and 1.0%1.5% and 1.4%2.1% for the comparable 20112012 periods.

The aggregate foreign currency exchange loss included in determining the condensed consolidated results of operations was approximately $0.3 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and $0.1 million and $0.4 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. Included in the aggregate foreign currency exchange losses were losses (gains) related to forward contracts of $0.2 million and $0.1 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively and ($0.3) million and ($0.8) million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. These amounts were recognized and are included in Other, net in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The change in currency exchange rates that have the largest impact on translating our international operating profit (loss) is the Japanese Yen. We use derivative financial instruments to mitigate these risks. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. We generally enter into monthly forward contracts to reduce the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on short-term foreign currency-denominated intercompany transactions and other known currency exposures.  The weighted average notional amount of derivative contracts outstanding during the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 was approximately $1.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively.following tables are in thousands:

 

June 30, 2013

 

Not Designated as Hedges under ASC 815 

 

Component of

 

Maturity
 Dates

 

Notional
Amount

 

Fair
Value

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

July 2013

 

3,300

 

32

 

Total Derivative Instruments

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,300

 

$

32

 

As

December 31, 2012

 

Not Designated as Hedges under ASC 815 

 

Component of

 

Maturity
 Dates

 

Notional
Amount

 

Fair
Value

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

January 2013

 

9,590

 

244

 

Total Derivative Instruments

 

 

 

 

 

$

9,590

 

$

244

 

 

 

Location of Realized Net
(Loss) Gain and Changes in

 

For the three months
ended June 30,

 

For the six months
ended June 30,

 

Derivative 

 

the Fair Value of Derivatives

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

Other, net

 

$

(71

)

$

(158

)

$

157

 

$

(78

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average notional amount of derivatives outstanding

 

 

 

$

1,360

 

$

2,560

 

$

1,994

 

$

2,501

 

36


Table of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, there were no gains or losses related to forward contracts included in prepaid expenses and other current assets or accrued expenses and other current liabilities.  Monthly forward contracts with a notional amount of $0.6 million, entered into in June 2012 for October 2012, will be settled in October 2012. The fair value of the contracts at inception was zero, which did not significantly change at June 30, 2012.Contents

 

We believe that based upon our hedging program,strategy, a 10% change in foreign exchange rates would have an immaterial impact on the condensed consolidated statementsCondensed Consolidated Statements of income.Operations. We believe that this quantitative measure has inherent limitations because as discussed in the first paragraph of this section, it does not take into account any governmental actions or changes in either customer purchasing patterns or our financing and operating strategies.

 

Assuming second quarter 20122013 investment levels, the effect of a one-point change in interest rates would not have a material effect on net interest expense. We centrally manage our investment portfolios considering investment opportunities and risk, tax consequences and overall financing strategies. Our investment portfolio includes fixed-income securities with a fair value of approximately $221.8$340.3 million as of June 30, 2012.2013. These securities are subject to interest rate risk and will decline in value if interest rates increase. Based on our investment portfolio as of June 30, 2012,2013, an immediate 100 basis point increase in interest rates may result in a decrease in the fair value of the portfolio of approximately $1.4$2.3 million. Our investment portfolio as of September 30, 2013 had a fair value of approximately $322.5 million. An immediate 100 basis point increase in interest rates may result in a decrease in the fair value of the September 30, 2013 portfolio of approximately $2.9 million. While an increase in interest rates may reduce the fair value of the investment portfolio, it is unlikely that we will not realize the losses in our condensed consolidated statement of income unless the individual fixed-income securities are sold prior to recovery or the loss is determined to be other-than-temporary.

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.Procedures

 

Our senior management is responsible for establishingThis Item 4 includes information concerning the controls and maintaining a systemcontrol evaluations referred to in the certifications of disclosureour Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act included in this Report as Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 under15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”))Act) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we filefiled or submitsubmitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controlsforms and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that such information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer or officersthe Chief Executive Officer and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriateChief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.disclosures.

 

We have evaluatedVeeco’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2012 in connection with the preparation of our annual report on Form 10-K, for year ended December 31, 2012.  As described below, management has identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which is an integral component of our disclosure controls and procedures.  As a result of those material weaknesses, management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of  June 30, 2013.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of  Veeco and its consolidated subsidiaries, under the supervision of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”).  Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the participationpolicies or procedures may deteriorate. A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of management, includingdeficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the chief executive officer and chiefannual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

 

29Veeco management, under the supervision of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012 based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  In connection with the above assessment, Veeco management identified the following material weaknesses:

37



Table of Contents

 

financial officer, asInadequate and ineffective controls over the recognition of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer concluded that our disclosurerevenue

We did not have adequate controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by usrevenue was recorded in reports thataccordance with U.S. GAAP.  Specifically, we file or submit undernoted the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and is accumulated and communicatedfollowing with respect to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.accounting for certain revenue transactions:

 

There·We did not maintain a sufficient complement of personnel with an appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience, and training in the application of U.S. GAAP related to revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements.

·We did not design and maintain effective controls over the adequate review and approval of customer orders at certain of our foreign subsidiaries to ensure that the order documentation received from the customer constituted the final order documentation.  Additionally, in some cases, our foreign subsidiaries did not always communicate to our corporate accounting staff all of the information necessary to make accurate revenue recognition determinations.

·We did not design and maintain adequate procedures or effective review and approval controls over the accurate recording, presentation and disclosure of revenue and related costs related to multiple-element arrangements, including ensuring that multiple-element arrangements were identified, evaluated and effectively reviewed by appropriate accounting personnel.  Specifically, we did not establish adequate procedures or design effective controls to:

·Identify the nature of contracts, capture necessary data and determine how revenue should be recognized in accordance with applicable revenue recognition guidance.

·Ensure consistent communication and coordination between and among various finance and non-finance personnel about the scope, terms and modifications to customer arrangements.

·Ensure that all elements included in multiple-element arrangements were identified and accounted for appropriately.

·Assess whether vendor-specific objective evidence, third-party evidence of fair value or, for periods subsequent to January 1, 2011, adequate documentation of management’s determination of best estimate of selling price existed for all the elements in the arrangement.

As a result of the material weaknesses described above, management has concluded that, as of June 30, 2013, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective.

Remediation of Material Weaknesses in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is committed to the planning and implementation of remediation efforts to address the material weakness. These remediation efforts, summarized below, which have been implemented or are in process of implementation, are intended to both address the identified material weaknesses and to enhance our overall financial control environment.  In this regard, our initiatives include:

·Organizational Enhancements—The Company has hired a new Vice President—Global Revenue Recognition who will be responsible for all aspects of the Company’s revenue recognition policies, procedures and accounting.   The Company has also created three new corporate revenue recognition positions, two of which have already been filled.  Additionally, the Company has replaced certain key personnel in some of its foreign subsidiaries.

·Training—The Company is developing a comprehensive revenue recognition training program, portions of which have already been delivered.   This training is focused on senior-level management, customer-facing employees as well as business unit, finance, sales and marketing personnel, including those at our foreign subsidiaries.

38


Table of Contents

·Revenue Practices—The Company is currently evaluating its revenue practices and has begun implementing changes in those practices.  Improvements are focused in the areas of (1) development of more comprehensive revenue recognition policies  and improved procedures to ensure that such policies  are understood and consistently applied, (2) better communication among all functions involved in the sales process (e.g., sales, business unit, foreign subsidiaries, legal, accounting, finance), (3) more standardization of contract documentation  and revenue analyses for individual transactions and (4) system improvements and automation of manual processes.

While this remediation plan is being executed, the Company has also engaged additional external resources to support and supplement the Company’s existing internal resources.

When fully implemented and operational, we believe the measures described above will remediate the material weaknesses we have identified and strengthen our internal control over financial reporting. We are committed to continuing to improve our internal control processes and will continue to diligently and vigorously review our financial reporting controls and procedures.  As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal control over financial reporting, our management may determine to take additional measures.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Other than the ongoing remediation efforts described above, there have been no significant changes in our internal controls or other factorscontrol over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 20122013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

3039



Table of Contents

 

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

 

Veeco and certain other parties were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed on April 25, 2013 in the Superior Court of California, County of Sonoma.  The plaintiff in the lawsuit, Patrick Colbus, seeks unspecified damages and asserts claims that he suffered burns and other injuries while he was cleaning a molecular beam epitaxy system alleged to have been manufactured by Veeco.  The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that the molecular beam epitaxy system was defective and that Veeco failed to adequately warn of the potential risks of the system. Although Veeco believes this lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend vigorously against the claims, and although Veeco maintains insurance which may apply to this matter, the lawsuit could result in substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources from our operations and negatively affect our public image and reputation. Because the Company believes that this potential loss is not probable or estimable, it has not recorded any reserves related to this legal matter.

We are involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, statementsresults of incomeoperations, or cash flows.

 

Item 1A.  Risk Factors.Factors

 

Information regarding risk factors appears in the “SafeSafe Harbor Statement”Statement at the beginning of this Quarterly Reportquarterly report on Form 10-Q, in Part I — Item 1A of our Annual Reportannual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20112012 and in Part II — Item 1A of our Quarterly Reportquarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.2013. There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our 2011 Annual Reportannual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and our Quarterly Reportquarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012.2013.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable

Item 5. Other Information

None

 

3140



Table of Contents

 

Item 6. Exhibits.Exhibits

 

Unless otherwise indicated, each of the following exhibits has been previously filed with the SEC by the Company under File No. 0-16244.

 

Number

 

Description

 

Incorporated by Reference
to the
Following Document:

 

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

Third Amendment effective April 27, 2012 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, Exhibit 10.2.

10.2

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement (2012 rev.)

*

10.3

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement (2012 rev.)

*

10.4

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2012 rev.)

*

10.5

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement (Non-Employee Director) (2011 rev.)

*

10.6

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement (Performance Based) (2012 rev.)

*

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

 

*

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

 

*

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.

 

*

32.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.

 

*

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance

 

**

101.XSD

 

XBRL Schema

 

**

101.PRE

 

XBRL Presentation

 

**

101.CAL

 

XBRL Calculation

 

**

101.DEF

 

XBRL Definition

 

**

101.LAB

 

XBRL Label

 

**

 


*                                         Filed herewith

**                                  Filed herewith electronically

 

3241



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date:  July 27, 2012November 3, 2013

 

 

Veeco Instruments Inc.

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ JOHN R. PEELER

 

 

John R. Peeler

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ DAVID D. GLASS

 

 

David D. Glass

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

3342



Table of Contents

 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

Unless otherwise indicated, each of the following exhibits has been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company under File No. 0-16244.

 

Number

 

Description

 

Incorporated by Reference
to the
Following Document:

 

 

 

 

 

10.1

 

Third Amendment effective April 27, 2012 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, Exhibit 10.2.

10.2

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement (2012 rev.)

*

10.3

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement (2012 rev.)

*

10.4

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2012 rev.)

*

10.5

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement (Non-Employee Director) (2011 rev.)

*

10.6

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement (Performance Based) (2012 rev.)

*

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

 

*

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

 

*

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.

 

*

32.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.

 

*

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance

 

**

101.XSD

 

XBRL Schema

 

**

101.PRE

 

XBRL Presentation

 

**

101.CAL

 

XBRL Calculation

 

**

101.DEF

 

XBRL Definition

 

**

101.LAB

 

XBRL Label

 

**

 


*                                         Filed herewith

**                                  Filed herewith electronically

 


43