UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013

o¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-22874

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

94-2579683

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

430 North McCarthy Boulevard, Milpitas, California 95035

(Address of principal executive offices including Zip code)

(408) 546-5000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes xNo o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer x		Accelerated filer o¨

Non-accelerated filer o¨		Smaller reporting company o¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of ~~January 26,~~April 27, 2013, the Registrant had ~~235,145,384~~236,562,275 shares of common stock outstanding, including ~~3,681,302~~3,528,817 exchangeable shares of JDS Uniphase Canada Ltd. The par value of each share of common stock is $0.001. Each exchangeable share is exchangeable at any time into common stock on a one-for-one basis, entitles a holder to dividend and other rights economically equivalent to those of the common stock, and through a voting trust, votes at meetings of stockholders of the Registrant.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page

PART I-	FINANCIAL INFORMATION		1
	Item 1.	Financial Statements	1
		Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 ~~and December 31, 2011~~	1
		Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive ~~Income (Loss)~~Loss for the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 ~~and December 31, 2011~~	2
		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012	3
		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 ~~and December 31, 2011~~	4
		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	5
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2931
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risks	4143

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	4345

PART II-	OTHER INFORMATION		4345
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	4345
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4345
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4345
	Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	4345
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	4345
	Item 5.	Other Information	4345
	Item 6.	Exhibits	4446

SIGNATURES			4547

Table of Contents

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in millions, except per share data)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	December 29,			December 31,			December 29,			December 31,			March 30,			March 31,			March 30,			March 31,
	2012			2011			2012			2011			2013			2012			2013			2012
Net revenue	$	429.4		$	409.3		$	850.3		$	825.1		$	405.3		$	403.3		$	1,255.6		$	1,228.4
Cost of sales	225.8			219.4			457.0			439.3			233.0			221.4			690.0			660.7
Amortization of acquired technologies	14.6			15.4			31.7			29.7			17.0			14.1			48.7			43.8
Gross profit	189.0			174.5			361.6			356.1			155.3			167.8			516.9			523.9
Operating expenses:
Research and development	63.5			58.9			125.1			118.2			65.8			62.0			190.9			180.2
Selling, general and administrative	105.4			105.3			210.1			215.6			107.3			104.5			317.4			320.1
Amortization of other intangibles	2.2			5.4			5.7			10.5			3.1			5.7			8.8			16.2
Restructuring and related charges	3.0			4.0			5.7			5.5			0.4			2.0			6.1			7.5
Total operating expenses	174.1			173.6			346.6			349.8			176.6			174.2			523.2			524.0
Income from operations	14.9			0.9			15.0			6.3
Loss from operations													(21.3		)	(6.4		)	(6.3		)	(0.1		)
Interest and other income (expense), net	(2.4		)	1.0			(2.8		)	2.0			(0.9		)	0.2			(3.7		)	2.2
Interest expense	(5.1		)	(6.6		)	(11.2		)	(13.2		)	(4.2		)	(6.9		)	(15.4		)	(20.1		)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	7.4			(4.7		)	1.0			(4.9		)
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes													(26.4		)	(13.1		)	(25.4		)	(18.0		)
Provision for income taxes	4.1			3.0			7.5			6.4			1.6			3.1			9.1			9.5
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax	3.3			(7.7		)	(6.5		)	(11.3		)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	0.8			(2.5		)	(1.0		)	(4.7		)
Net income (loss)	$	4.1		$	(10.2	)	$	(7.5	)	$	(16.0	)
Loss from continuing operations, net of tax													(28.0		)	(16.2		)	(34.5		)	(27.5		)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax													—			(1.2		)	(1.0		)	(5.9		)
Net loss													$	(28.0	)	$	(17.4	)	$	(35.5	)	$	(33.4	)

Basic net income (loss) per share from:
Basic and diluted net loss per share from:
Continuing operations, net of tax	$	0.02		$	(0.03	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.12	)	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.12	)
Discontinued operations, net of tax	—			(0.01		)	—			(0.02		)	—			(0.01		)	—			(0.03		)
Net income (loss)	$	0.02		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.07	)

Diluted net income (loss) per share from:
Continuing operations, net of tax	$	0.02		$	(0.03	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.05	)
Discontinued operations, net of tax	—			(0.01		)	—			(0.02		)
Net income (loss)	$	0.02		$	(0.04	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.07	)
Net loss													$	(0.12	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.15	)	$	(0.15	)

Shares used in per share calculation:
Basic	234.4			229.4			233.6			228.9			235.9			230.6			234.4			229.5
Diluted	237.1			229.4			233.6			228.9			235.9			230.6			234.4			229.5

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE ~~INCOME (LOSS)~~LOSS

(in millions)

(unaudited)

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

December 29,

December 31,

December 29,

December 31,

2012

2011

2012

2011

Net income (loss)

$
4.1

$
(10.2
)
$
(7.5
)
$
(16.0
)
Other comprehensive income (loss):

Unrealized gains and losses on investments, net of tax:

Unrealized holding (losses) gains arising during period

(0.1
)
—

0.3

(0.3
)
Less: reclassification adjustments included in net income (loss)

—

—

(0.1
)
(1.3
)
Net change in cumulative translation adjustment

3.1

(0.7
)
6.4

(6.3
)
Net change in defined benefit obligation, net of tax

—

(0.4
)
—

(0.4
)
Net change in other comprehensive income (loss)

3.0

(1.1
)
6.6

(8.3
)
Comprehensive income (loss)

$
7.1

$
(11.3
)
$
(0.9
)
$
(24.3
)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	March 30,			March 31,			March 30,			March 31,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net loss	$	(28.0	)	$	(17.4	)	$	(35.5	)	$	(33.4	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized gains and losses on investments, net of tax:
Unrealized holding gains arising during period	0.1			0.3			0.4			—
Less: reclassification adjustments included in net loss	(0.3		)	0.2			(0.4		)	(1.1		)
Net change in cumulative translation adjustment	(3.2		)	2.4			3.2			(3.9		)
Net change in defined benefit obligation, net of tax	—			—			—			(0.4		)
Net change in accumulated other comprehensive income	(3.4		)	2.9			3.2			(5.4		)
Comprehensive loss	$	(31.4	)	$	(14.5	)	$	(32.3	)	$	(38.8	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions, except share and par value data)

(unaudited)

	December 29,			June 30,			March 30,			June 30,
	2012			2012			2013			2012
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	305.5		$	401.1		$	257.7		$	401.1
Short-term investments	403.8			320.5			350.4			320.5
Restricted cash	30.9			31.1			30.7			31.1
Accounts receivable, net (Note 6)	278.8			305.8			295.2			305.8
Inventories, net	179.3			174.5			153.6			174.5
Prepayments and other current assets	78.4			77.2			83.4			77.2
Total current assets	1,276.7			1,310.2			1,171.0			1,310.2
Property, plant and equipment, net	250.3			252.9			249.1			252.9
Goodwill	75.3			68.7			114.8			68.7
Intangibles, net	139.9			178.8			168.0			178.8
Other non-current assets	70.7			58.9			59.2			58.9
Total assets	$	1,812.9		$	1,869.5		$	1,762.1		$	1,869.5
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	116.1		$	117.6		$	122.1		$	117.6
Accrued payroll and related expenses	80.2			68.6			59.0			68.6
Income taxes payable	22.9			20.7			20.3			20.7
Deferred revenue	59.9			81.2			69.6			81.2
Accrued expenses	37.4			35.3			38.4			35.3
Short-term debt	205.6			292.8			159.6			292.8
Other current liabilities	33.1			37.9			32.2			37.9
Total current liabilities	555.2			654.1			501.2			654.1
Other non-current liabilities	192.5			176.6			205.8			176.6
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value; 1 million shares authorized; 1 share at December 29, 2012 and June 30, 2012, issued and outstanding	—			—
Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 1 billion shares authorized; 234 million shares at December 29, 2012 and 232 million shares at June 30, 2012, issued and outstanding	0.2			0.2
Preferred Stock, $0.001 par value; 1 million shares authorized; 1 share at March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, issued and outstanding							—			—
Common Stock, $0.001 par value; 1 billion shares authorized; 237 million shares at March 30, 2013 and 232 million shares at June 30, 2012, issued and outstanding							0.2			0.2
Additional paid-in capital	69,723.0			69,695.7			69,744.3			69,695.7
Accumulated deficit	(68,672.1		)	(68,664.6		)	(68,700.1		)	(68,664.6		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	14.1			7.5			10.7			7.5
Total stockholders’ equity	1,065.2			1,038.8			1,055.1			1,038.8
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,812.9		$	1,869.5		$	1,762.1		$	1,869.5

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in millions)

(unaudited)

	Six Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	December 29,			December 31,			March 30,			March 31,
	2012			2011			2013			2012
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(7.5	)	$	(16.0	)	$	(35.5	)	$	(33.4	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation expense	33.9			34.7			50.9			52.6
Amortization of acquired technologies and other intangibles	37.6			43.8			57.7			65.4
Stock-based compensation	26.3			24.1			41.6			37.5
Amortization of debt issuance costs and accretion of debt discount	8.3			10.3			11.3			15.6
Amortization of discount and premium on investments, net	1.9			1.9			3.3			2.9
Other	1.3			—			1.8			1.0
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of impact of acquisition of business:
Accounts receivable	29.4			38.8			17.2			28.6
Inventories	(4.7		)	(19.6		)	19.8			(22.9		)
Other current and non-current assets	(13.8		)	(6.7		)	(2.6		)	(6.5		)
Accounts payable	3.6			(21.8		)	6.1			(19.0		)
Income taxes payable	2.6			(0.8		)	0.5			(0.7		)
Deferred revenue, current and non-current	(12.5		)	(9.6		)	(2.0		)	2.4
Accrued payroll and related expenses	1.1			(13.0		)	(24.3		)	(36.9		)
Accrued expenses and other current and non-current liabilities	(5.0		)	2.5			(15.1		)	(4.8		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	102.5			68.6			130.7			81.8

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of available-for-sale investments	(292.5		)	(211.2		)	(415.1		)	(333.1		)
Maturities and sales of investments	208.9			201.5			382.2			324.9
Changes in restricted cash	0.5			1.8			0.6			2.1
Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired	(11.1		)	(3.7		)	(83.2		)	(12.5		)
Acquisition of property and equipment	(33.3		)	(40.8		)	(46.7		)	(56.9		)
Proceeds from the sale of a business and assets, net of selling costs	11.7			2.1			11.7			2.1
Net cash used in investing activities	(115.8		)	(50.3		)	(150.5		)	(73.4		)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Redemption of convertible debt	(96.5		)	—			(145.8		)	—
Proceeds from financing obligations	—			6.9			—			6.9
Payment of financing obligations	(0.4		)	(7.6		)	(0.6		)	(9.7		)
Payment of debt issuance costs							(0.2		)	(1.6		)
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options and employee stock purchase plan	11.5			7.0			21.3			17.5
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(85.4		)	6.3			(125.3		)	13.1

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	3.1			(4.8		)	1.7			(2.9		)
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(95.6		)	19.8			(143.4		)	18.6
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	401.1			395.4			401.1			395.4
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	305.5		$	415.2		$	257.7		$	414.0

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

The financial information for JDS Uniphase Corporation (“JDSU,” also referred to as “the Company”) as of ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 ~~and December 31, 2011~~ is unaudited, and includes all normal and recurring adjustments ~~that~~ Company management (“Management”) considers necessary for a fair statement of the financial information set forth herein, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, such information does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statements. For further information, please refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on December 14, 2012.

The balance sheet as of June 30, 2012 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The results for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 ~~and December 31, 2011~~ may not be indicative of results for the year ending June 29, 2013 or any future periods.

Fiscal Years

The Company utilizes a 52-53 week fiscal year ending on the Saturday closest to June 30th. The Company’s fiscal 2013 is a 52-week year ending on June 29, 2013. The Company’s fiscal 2012 was a 52-week year and ended on June 30, 2012.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and include the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Out-of-Period Adjustments

During the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the Company recorded out-of-period adjustments ~~primarily~~that related to ~~the~~ cost of sales and other income in the current and prior fiscal ~~year 2011.~~years. The impact of the ~~corrections reduced~~out-of-period adjustments recorded by the Company resulted in a $2.5 million reduction in net loss ~~by $1.9 million for~~during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~September 29, 2012.~~March 30, 2013. Management and the Audit Committee have concluded these errors, both individually and in aggregate, were not material to any prior year financial statements and the impact of correcting these errors in the current year is not expected to be material to the full year fiscal 2013 financial statements, accordingly the Company recorded the correction of these errors in ~~the first quarter of~~ fiscal 2013.

Discontinued Operations

~~On October 12, 2012,~~During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company closed the sale of its hologram business (“Hologram Business”) to OpSec Security Inc. for $11.5 million in cash. The Consolidated Statements of Operations have been recast to present the Hologram Business as discontinued operations as described in “Note 18. Discontinued Operations.” Unless noted otherwise, discussion in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements pertain to continuing operations.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, the reported amount of net revenue and expenses and the disclosure of commitments and contingencies during the reporting periods. The Company bases estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions about the future believed to be reasonable based on available information. The Company’s reported financial position or results of operations may be materially different under changed conditions or when using different estimates and assumptions, particularly with respect to significant accounting policies. If estimates or assumptions differ from actual results, subsequent periods are adjusted to reflect more current information.

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 2. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~December 2011,~~March 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued authoritative guidance that resolves the diversity in practice regarding the release into net income of the cumulative translation adjustment upon derecognition of a subsidiary or group of assets within a foreign entity. This guidance will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2015. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements, absent any material transactions involving the derecognition of subsidiaries or groups of assets within a foreign entity.
In December 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. This guidance will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2014. The adoption of this guidance may expand existing disclosure requirements, which the Company is currently evaluating.
5

~~Table of Contents~~
~~JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(Unaudited)~~

Note 3. Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in millions, except per share data):

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

December 29,
2012

December 31,
2011

December 29,
2012

December 31,
2011

Numerator:

Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax

$
3.3

$
(7.7
)
$
(6.5
)
$
(11.3
)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

0.8

(2.5
)
(1.0
)
(4.7
)
Net income (loss)

$
4.1

$
(10.2
)
$
(7.5
)
$
(16.0
)

Denominator:

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding

Basic

234.4

229.4

233.6

228.9

Effect of dilutive securities from stock-based benefit plans

2.7

—

—

—

Diluted

237.1

229.4

233.6

228.9

Basic net income (loss) per share from:

Continuing operations, net of tax

$
0.02

$
(0.03
)
$
(0.03
)
$
(0.05
)
Discontinued operations, net of tax

—

(0.01
)
—

(0.02
)
Net income (loss)

$
0.02

$
(0.04
)
$
(0.03
)
$
(0.07
)

Diluted net income (loss) per share from:

Continuing operations, net of tax

$
0.02

$
(0.03
)
$
(0.03
)
$
(0.05
)
Discontinued operations, net of tax

—

(0.01
)
—

(0.02
)
Net income (loss)

$
0.02

$
(0.04
)
$
(0.03
)
$
(0.07
)

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

March 30,

March 31,

March 30,

March 31,

2013

2012

2013

2012

Numerator:

Loss from continuing operations, net of tax

$
(28.0
)
$
(16.2
)
$
(34.5
)
$
(27.5
)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

—

(1.2
)
(1.0
)
(5.9
)
Net loss

$
(28.0
)
$
(17.4
)
$
(35.5
)
$
(33.4
)

Denominator:

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding

Basic and diluted

235.9

230.6

234.4

229.5

Basic and diluted net loss per share from:

Continuing operations, net of tax

$
(0.12
)
$
(0.07
)
$
(0.15
)
$
(0.12
)
Discontinued operations, net of tax

—

(0.01
)
—

(0.03
)
Net loss

$
(0.12
)
$
(0.08
)
$
(0.15
)
$
(0.15
)

As the Company incurred net losses for the ~~six~~three and nine months ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, ~~and for the three and six months ended December 31, 2011,~~ potential dilutive securities from stock options, employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) and ~~Full Value Awards (restricted shares and stock units)~~Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) have been excluded from the diluted net loss per share computations as their effects were deemed anti-dilutive.

The following table sets forth the weighted-average potentially dilutive securities excluded from the computation of the diluted net ~~income (loss)~~loss per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive (in millions):

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

March 30,

March 31,

March 30,

March 31,

December 29,
2012

December 31,
2011

December 29,
2012

December 31,
2011

2013

2012

2013

2012

Stock options and ESPP

3.9

10.4

8.2

10.7

7.1

9.7

7.9

10.3

Restricted shares and stock units

3.3

8.2

9.2

7.8

RSUs

9.5

7.7

9.3

7.8

Total potentially dilutive securities

7.2

18.6

17.4

18.5

16.6

17.4

17.2

18.1

The Company’s 1% Senior Convertible Notes are not included in the table above. The par amount of convertible notes is payable in cash equal to the principal amount of the notes plus any accrued and unpaid interest and then the “in-the-money” conversion benefit feature at the conversion price above $30.30 per share is payable in shares of the Company’s common stock or cash. See “Note 10. Debts and Letters of Credit” for more details.
6

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 4. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income consists of the accumulated net unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments, foreign currency translation adjustments and defined benefit ~~obligation.~~obligations.

6

~~Table of Contents~~
~~JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(Unaudited)~~
~~At December 29, 2012 and June~~For the nine months ended March 30, ~~2012, balances for~~2013, the ~~components of~~changes in accumulated other comprehensive income by component net of tax were as follows (in millions):

December 29,
2012

June 30,
2012

Unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments, net of tax

$
(2.6
)
$

(2.8
)
Foreign currency translation adjustments

17.0

10.6

Defined benefit obligation, net of tax

(0.3
)
(0.3
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income

$
14.1

$
7.5

Unrealized gains

(losses) on

Foreign currency

Defined benefit

available-for-

translation

obligation, net

sale investments

adjustments

of tax (1)

Total

Beginning balance as of June 30, 2012

$
(2.8
)
$
10.6

$
(0.3
)
$
7.5

Other comprehensive income before reclassification

0.4

3.2

—

3.6

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (2)

(0.4
)
—

—

(0.4
)
Net current-period other comprehensive income

—

3.2

—

3.2

Ending balance as of March 30, 2013

$
(2.8
)
$
13.8

$
(0.3
)
$
10.7

(1) Refer to “Note 14. Employee Defined Benefit Plan” for more details on the computation of net periodic cost for pension plans.
(2) Amount represents realized gain on the sale of available-for-sale securities and is included as a component of Interest and
other income (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended March 30, 2013. There was
no tax impact on the sale.

Note 5. Mergers and Acquisitions
Arieso Ltd. (“Arieso”)
On March 7, 2013 (“Closing Date”), the Company completed the acquisition of Arieso, a privately-held company headquartered in the United Kingdom. Arieso is a provider of location-aware software solutions that enable mobile network operators to boost 2G, 3G and 4G/Long Term evolution (“LTE”) network performance and enrich the mobile subscriber experience.
Arieso brings high-caliber mobile software engineering expertise to the Company to address the rapidly growing deployment of small cells and challenges associated with limited spectrum capacity. Utilized by leading wireless network operators and equipment manufacturers, Arieso’s solutions locate, store and analyze data from billions of mobile connection events that translate into rich intelligence, which help enable mobile operators to optimize network performance, improve customer experience and create new revenue-generating services. Arieso will be integrated in the Company’s Communications Test and Measurement segment (“CommTest”).
The Company acquired all outstanding shares of Arieso for approximately $89.6 million in cash subject to working capital adjustments, including holdback payments of approximately $12.8 million which are reserved for potential breaches of representations and warranties. The holdback payments, minus any deductions for actual or pending claims, will be released more than one year after the Closing Date.
The Company accounted for the transaction in accordance with the authoritative guidance on business combinations; therefore, the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value on the acquisition date.
7

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The purchase price was allocated as follows (in millions):
Net tangible assets acquired

$
0.5

Intangible assets acquired:

Developed technology

32.8

Customer relationships

14.5

Order backlog

1.4

Goodwill

40.4

Total purchase price

$
89.6

The amounts above are considered preliminary and are subject to change once the Company receives certain information it believes is necessary to finalize its determination of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed under the acquisition.
The following table summarizes the components of the tangible assets acquired at fair value (in millions):
Cash

$
4.1

Accounts receivable

8.4

Property and equipment

0.6

Accounts payable

(0.3
)
Accrued expenses, net of other assets

(1.4
)
Employee related liabilities

(1.4
)
Deferred revenue

(1.7
)
Deferred tax liabilities, net

(7.8
)
Net tangible assets acquired

$
0.5

Acquired intangible assets are classified as Level 3 assets for which fair value is derived from valuation based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. The fair value of acquired developed technology, customer relationships and order backlog was determined based on an income approach using the discounted cash flow method. The acquired developed technology and customer relationship intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of five years. Order backlog is being amortized over 4 months.
The goodwill arising from this acquisition is primarily attributed to sales of future products and services and the assembled workforce of Arieso. Goodwill will be assigned to the CommTest segment and is not deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill is not being amortized but is reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, in accordance with authoritative guidance.
In accordance with the authoritative guidance, the Company expensed $1.6 million of acquisition-related costs incurred as Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013.
The estimated amount of Arieso’s net revenue and net loss (excluding acquisition-related costs), included in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Operations for three and nine months ended March 30, 2013 was $0.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively. Arieso’s net revenue and earnings disclosed above reflect Management’s best estimate, based on information available at the reporting date.
8

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following table presents certain unaudited pro forma information for illustrative purposes only, for 2013 and 2012 as if Arieso had been acquired on July 3, 2011. The unaudited estimated pro forma information combines the historical results of Arieso with the Company’s consolidated historical results and includes certain adjustments reflecting the estimated impact of fair value adjustments for the respective periods. The pro forma information is not indicative of what would have occurred had the acquisition taken place on July 3, 2011. Additionally, the pro forma financial information does not include the impact of possible business model changes and does not reflect pro forma adjustments to conform accounting policies between Arieso and the Company. The Company expects to achieve further business synergies, including revenue growth, as a result of the acquisition that are not reflected in the pro forma amounts that follow. As a result, actual results will differ from the unaudited pro forma information presented (in millions):

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

March 30,

March 31,

March 30,

March 31,

2013

2012

2013

2012

Pro forma net revenue

$
406.0

$
407.6

$
1,259.3

$
1,239.9

Pro forma loss from continuing operations, net of tax

31.1

17.6

46.8

33.0

GenComm Co., Ltd. (“GenComm”)

On August 17, 2012, ~~(“Closing Date”),~~ the Company completed the acquisition of Seoul, South Korea-based GenComm, a provider of test and measurement solutions for troubleshooting, installation and maintenance of wireless base stations and repeaters, based in Seoul, South Korea. The Company acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities of GenComm for a total purchase price of approximately $15.2 million in cash, including holdback payments of approximately $3.8 million which are reserved for potential breaches of representations and warranties. The holdback payments, minus any deductions for actual or pending claims, will be released more than one year after the ~~Closing Date.~~closing date. After the ~~Closing Date,~~closing date, GenComm was integrated in the Company’s ~~Communications Test and Measurement segment (“CommTest”).~~CommTest segment.

The Company accounted for the transaction in accordance with the authoritative guidance on business combinations; therefore, the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value on the acquisition date.

The purchase price was allocated as follows (in ~~millions~~millions)):

Net tangible assets acquired

$
5.9

$
5.9

Intangible assets acquired:

Developed technology

3.2

3.2

Customer relationships

0.2

0.2

Backlog

0.2

Order backlog

0.2

Goodwill

5.7

5.7

Total purchase price

$
15.2

$
15.2

The following table summarizes the components of the tangible assets acquired at fair value (in millions):

Cash

$
1.9

Accounts receivable

2.3

Inventories

2.4

Property and equipment

2.9

Tax liabilities, net

(1.7
)
Employee related liabilities

(1.5
)
Other assets and liabilities, net

(0.4
)
Net tangible assets acquired

$
5.9

Acquired intangible assets are classified as Level 3 assets for which fair value is derived from valuation based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. The fair value of acquired developed technology, customer relationships and order backlog was determined based on an income approach using the discounted cash flow method. The acquired developed technology and customer relationship intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of four years. ~~Backlog has been~~Order backlog was fully amortized as of September 29, 2012.

The goodwill arising from this acquisition is primarily attributed to sales of future products and services and the assembled workforce of GenComm. Goodwill has been assigned to the CommTest segment and is not deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill is not being amortized but is reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, in accordance with authoritative guidance.
79

Table of Contents

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

The goodwill arising from this acquisition is primarily attributed to sales of future products and services and the assembled workforce of GenComm. Goodwill is not being amortized but is reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, in accordance with authoritative guidance. Goodwill has been assigned to the CommTest segment and is not deductible for tax purposes.
GenComm’s results of operations have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements subsequent to the ~~Closing Date.~~closing date. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of the acquisition was not material to prior period financial statements.

Dyaptive Systems Inc. (“Dyaptive”)

In January 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of Dyaptive based in Vancouver, Canada. The Company acquired tangible and intangible assets and assumed liabilities of Dyaptive for a total purchase price of CAD 14.9 million (approximately USD 14.8 million) in cash, including a holdback payment of CAD 2.0 million (approximately USD 2.0 million). The holdback payment of CAD 2.0 million (approximately USD 2.0 million) was made during the three months ended December 29, 2012.

Dyaptive is a provider of wireless laboratory test tools for base station and network load simulators. The Company acquired Dyaptive to strengthen its laboratory product portfolio and to offer field service and production test tools that complement its current products. After the ~~Closing Date,~~closing date, Dyaptive was integrated in the Company’s CommTest segment.

The Company accounted for the transaction in accordance with the authoritative guidance on business combinations; therefore, the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value on the acquisition date.

The purchase price was allocated as follows (in millions, in ~~USD~~USD)):

Net tangible assets acquired

$
3.4

Intangible assets acquired:

Developed technology

6.2

Customer relationships

2.3

Others

0.9

Goodwill

2.0

Total purchase price

$
14.8

The following table summarizes the components of the tangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value (in millions):

Cash

$
4.0

Accounts receivable

0.9

Inventories

0.8

Property and equipment

0.5

Accounts payable

(0.2
)
Deferred revenue

(0.3
)
Employee related liabilities

(2.3
)
Net tangible assets acquired

$
3.4

Acquired intangible assets are classified as Level 3 assets for which fair value is derived from valuation based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. The fair value of acquired developed technology and customer relationships was determined based on an income approach using the discounted cash flow method. The acquired developed technology and customer relationship intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of four years.

The goodwill arising from this acquisition is primarily attributed to sales of future products and services and the assembled workforce of Dyaptive. Goodwill has been assigned to the CommTest segment and is not deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill is not being amortized but is reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, in accordance with authoritative guidance. ~~Goodwill has been assigned to the CommTest segment and is not deductible for tax purposes.~~
8

~~Table of Contents~~
~~JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(Unaudited)~~

Dyaptive’s results of operations have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements subsequent to the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of the acquisition was not material to prior period financial statements.
10

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 6. Balance Sheet and Other Details

Accounts Receivable Reserves and Allowances

The activities and balances for allowance for doubtful accounts and allowance for sales returns were as follows (in millions):

June 30,

Charged to Costs

March 30,

June 30,
2012

Charged to Costs
and Expenses

Deduction (1)

December 29,
2012

2012

and Expenses

Deduction (1)

2013

Allowance for doubtful accounts

$
2.2

$
0.4

$
(0.6
)
$
2.0

$
2.2

$
0.5

$
(0.6
)
$
2.1

Allowance for sales returns

0.4

—

(0.3
)
0.1

0.4

—

(0.3
)
0.1

Total accounts receivable reserves

$
2.6

$
0.4

$
(0.9
)
$
2.1

$
2.6

$
0.5

$
(0.9
)
$
2.2

(1) Write-off of uncollectible accounts, net of recoveries.

Inventories, Net

Inventories, net are stated at the lower of cost or market, and include material, labor, and manufacturing overhead costs. The components of ~~inventories,~~Inventories, net were as follows (in millions):

March 30,

June 30,

December 29,
2012

June 30,
2012

2013

2012

Finished goods

$
95.8

$
89.5

$
84.3

$
89.5

Work in process

37.4

37.3

38.5

37.3

Raw materials and purchased parts

46.1

47.7

Total inventories, net

$
179.3

$
174.5

Raw materials

30.8

47.7

Inventories, net

$
153.6

$
174.5

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

The components of ~~property,~~Property, plant and equipment, net were as follows (in millions):

March 30,

June 30,

December 29,
2012

June 30,
2012

2013

2012

Land

$
15.5

$
14.1

$
14.6

$
14.1

Buildings and improvements

38.7

35.8

34.8

35.8

Machinery and equipment

444.0

421.3

449.3

421.3

Furniture, fixtures, software and office equipment

171.1

166.1

171.5

166.1

Leasehold improvements

93.0

95.3

93.7

95.3

Construction-in-progress

18.8

33.0

24.1

33.0

781.1

765.6

788.0

765.6

Less: Accumulated depreciation

(530.8
)
(512.7
)

(538.9
)
(512.7
)
Property, plant and equipment, net

$
250.3

$
252.9

$
249.1

$
252.9

During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company completed a capital investment project in machinery and equipment to increase anti-counterfeiting production capabilities in Beijing, China that was included in Construction-in-progress as of June 30, 2012. The Company began depreciating the asset over its useful life of 20 years during the first quarter of fiscal 2013.

At ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, property, plant and equipment, net included ~~$20.7~~$22.2 million and ~~$21.4~~$23.8 million, respectively, in land and buildings related to the Santa Rosa and Eningen Transactions (as defined in “Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies” below) accounted for under the financing method. See “Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies” for more detail.

During the three months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, the Company recorded $17.0 million and $17.6 million of depreciation expense, respectively. During the nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, the Company recorded $50.8 million and $51.8 million of depreciation expense, respectively.
911

Table of Contents

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

During the three months ended December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company recorded $16.9 million and $17.1 million of depreciation expense, respectively. During the six months ended December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company recorded $33.8 million and $34.2 million of depreciation expense, respectively.
Prepayments and Other Current Assets

The components of ~~prepayments~~Prepayments and other current assets were as follows (~~in millions~~)(in millions):

March 30,

June 30,

December 29,
2012

June 30,
2012

2013

2012

Prepayments

$
31.1

$
30.9

$
31.6

$
30.9

Advances to contract manufacturers

16.4

18.4

18.4

18.4

Deferred income tax

2.4

2.3

2.5

2.3

Refundable income taxes

2.8

4.7

2.2

4.7

Other receivables

18.5

13.0

20.6

13.0

Assets held for sale

2.2

—

Other current assets

7.2

7.9

5.9

7.9

Total prepayments and other current assets

$
78.4

$
77.2

Prepayments and other current assets

$
83.4

$
77.2

As of March 30, 2013, land and buildings owned in Switzerland met the held for sale criteria in accordance with the authoritative guidance. Accordingly, the Company has classified the land and buildings as an asset held for sale which is recorded as a component of Prepayments and other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 30, 2013.

Other Current Liabilities

The components of ~~other~~Other current liabilities were as follows (in millions):

March 30,

June 30,

December 29,
2012

June 30,
2012

2013

2012

Deferred compensation plan

$
4.9

$
4.6

$
4.2

$
4.6

Warranty accrual

6.8

8.1

6.8

8.1

VAT liabilities

5.5

2.7

5.7

2.7

Restructuring accrual

5.6

8.6

3.0

8.6

Deferred taxes

3.5

3.1

3.5

3.1

Other

6.8

10.8

9.0

10.8

Total other current liabilities

$
33.1

$
37.9

Other current liabilities

$
32.2

$
37.9

Other Non-Current Liabilities

The components of ~~other~~Other non-current liabilities were as follows (in millions):

March 30,

June 30,

December 29,
2012

June 30,
2012

2013

2012

Pension accrual and post-employment benefits

$
89.8

$
85.2

$
86.8

$
85.2

Deferred taxes

4.0

4.7

11.4

4.7

Restructuring accrual

3.5

4.0

3.1

4.0

Financing obligation

35.0

35.4

34.6

35.4

Non-current income taxes payable

10.8

9.3

10.8

9.3

Asset retirement obligations

8.5

9.2

9.1

9.2

Long-term deferred revenue

25.3

16.1

25.0

16.1

Other

15.6

12.7

25.0

12.7

Total other non-current liabilities

$
192.5

$
176.6

Other non-current liabilities

$
205.8

$
176.6

1012

Table of Contents

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 7.Investments and Fair Value Measurements

The Company’s investments in marketable debt and equity securities were primarily classified as available-for-sale investments.

At ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the Company’s available-for-sale securities were as follows (in millions):

Amortized

Gross

Gross

Cost / Carrying

Unrealized

Unrealized

Estimated

Cost

Gains

Losses

Fair Value

Debt securities:

U.S. treasuries

$
71.9

$
—

$
—

$
71.9

Agencies

U.S.

53.4

0.1

—

53.5

Foreign

4.0

0.1

—

4.1

Municipal bonds and sovereign debt instruments

6.6

—

—

6.6

Asset-backed securities

40.2

0.3

(0.4
)
40.1

Corporate securities

U.S.

213.8

1.4

(0.1
)
215.1

Foreign

33.4

2.2

—

35.6

Total available-for-sale securities

$
423.3

$
4.1

$
(0.5
)
$
426.9

Amortized

Gross

Gross

Cost / Carrying

Unrealized

Unrealized

Estimated

Cost

Gains

Losses

Fair Value

Debt securities:

U.S. treasuries

$
30.6

$
—

$
—

$
30.6

U.S agencies

53.4

0.1

—

53.5

Municipal bonds and sovereign debt instruments

10.3

—

(0.1
)
10.2

Asset-backed securities

39.0

—

(0.3
)
38.7

Corporate securities

233.6

2.2

(0.5
)
235.3

Total debt available-for-sale securities

$
366.9

$
2.3

$
(0.9
)
$
368.3

The Company generally classifies debt securities as cash equivalents, short-term investments or other non-current assets based on the stated maturities; however, certain securities with stated maturities of longer than twelve months which are highly liquid and available to support current operations are classified as ~~current assets.~~ short-term investments. As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, of the total estimated fair value, ~~$26.6~~$21.3 million was classified as cash equivalents, ~~$398.9~~$346.2 million was classified as short-term investments and ~~$1.4~~$0.8 million was classified as other non-current assets.

In addition to the amounts presented above, at ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the Company’s short-term investments classified as trading securities, related to the deferred compensation plan, were ~~$4.9~~$4.2 million, of which ~~$1.5~~$0.8 million ~~were~~was invested in debt securities, ~~$0.4~~$0.3 million ~~were~~was invested in money market instruments and funds and ~~$3.0~~$3.1 million ~~were~~was invested in equity securities. Trading securities are reported at fair value, with the unrealized gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value recognized in Interest and other income (expense), net.

During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011,~~March 30, 2013, the Company recorded no other-than-temporary impairment ~~charge in each respective period.~~charge. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges of $0.3 million on an asset-backed security.

At ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the Company’s total gross unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, aggregated by type of investment instrument, were as follows (~~in millions~~)(in millions):

Less than 12
Months

Greater than 12
Months

Total

Less than 12
Months

Greater than 12
Months

Total

Municipal bonds and sovereign debt instruments

$
0.1

$
—

$
0.1

Asset-backed securities

$
—

$
0.4

$
0.4

—

0.3

0.3

Corporate securities

0.1

—

0.1

0.3

0.2

0.5

Total gross unrealized losses

$
0.1

$
0.4

$
0.5

$
0.4

$
0.5

$
0.9

At March 30, 2013, contractual maturities of the Company’s debt securities classified as available-for-sale securities were as follows (in millions):

Amortized

Cost / Carrying

Estimated

Cost

Fair Value

Amounts maturing in less than 1 year

$
199.9

$
201.5

Amounts maturing in 1 - 5 years

166.0

166.0

Amounts maturing in more than 5 years

1.0

0.8

Total debt available-for-sale securities

$
366.9

$
368.3

1113

Table of Contents

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

At ~~December 29, 2012, contractual maturities of the Company’s debt securities classified as available-for-sale securities were as follows (~~~~in millions~~):

Amortized

Cost / Carrying

Estimated

Cost

Fair Value

Amounts maturing in less than 1 year

$
241.3

$
244.4

Amounts maturing in 1 - 5 years

180.6

181.1

Amounts maturing in more than 5 years

1.4

1.4

Total debt securities

$
423.3

$
426.9

At June 30, 2012, the Company’s available-for-sale securities were as follows (in millions):

Amortized

Gross

Gross

Amortized

Gross

Gross

Cost / Carrying

Unrealized

Unrealized

Estimated

Cost / Carrying

Unrealized

Unrealized

Estimated

Cost

Gains

Losses

Fair Value

Cost

Gains

Losses

Fair Value

Debt securities:

U.S. treasuries

$
52.0

$
—

$
—

$
52.0

$
52.0

$
—

$
—

$
52.0

Agencies

U.S.

65.1

0.2

—

65.3

65.1

0.2

—

65.3

Foreign

3.3

—

—

3.3

3.3

—

—

3.3

Municipal bonds and sovereign debt instruments

11.4

—

—

11.4

11.4

—

—

11.4

Asset-backed securities

21.9

0.2

(0.4
)
21.7

21.9

0.2

(0.4
)
21.7

Corporate securities

183.6

1.3

(0.1
)
184.8

183.6

1.3

(0.1
)
184.8

Total available-for-sale securities

$
337.3

$
1.7

$
(0.5
)
$
338.5

Total debt available-for-sale securities

$
337.3

$
1.7

$
(0.5
)
$
338.5

The Company generally classifies debt securities as cash equivalents, short-term investments or other non-current assets based on the stated maturities; however, certain securities with stated maturities of longer than twelve months which are highly liquid and available to support current operations are classified as ~~current assets.~~short-term investments. As of June 30, 2012, of the total estimated fair value, $21.3 million was classified as cash equivalents, $315.9 million was classified as short-term investments and $1.3 million was classified as other non-current assets.

In addition to the amounts presented above, at June 30, 2012, the Company’s short-term investments classified as trading securities, related to the deferred compensation plan, were $4.6 million, of which $0.9 million ~~were~~was invested in debt securities, $0.5 million ~~were~~was invested in money market instruments and funds and $3.2 million ~~were~~was invested in equity securities. Trading securities are reported at fair value, with the unrealized gains or losses resulting from changes in fair value recognized in ~~interest~~Interest and other income (expense), net.

At June 30, 2012, the Company’s gross unrealized losses on available-for-sale securities, aggregated by type of investment instrument, were as follows (in millions):

Less than

Greater than

12 Months

12 Months

Total

Asset-backed securities

$
—

$
0.4

$
0.4

Corporate securities

0.1

—

0.1

Total gross unrealized losses

$
0.1

$
0.4

$
0.5

1214

Table of Contents

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Fair Value Measurements

Assets measured at fair value at ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 are summarized below (in millions):

Fair value measurement as of March 30, 2013

Quoted Prices in

Significant

Active Markets

Other

for Identical

Observable

Fair value measurement as of December 29,
2012

Assets

Inputs

Total

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Total

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

Assets:

Debt available-for-sale securities

U.S. treasuries

$
71.9

$
71.9

$
—

$
30.6

$
30.6

$
—

Agencies

U.S.

53.5

—

53.5

Foreign

4.1

—

4.1

U.S. agencies

53.5

—

53.5

Municipal bonds and sovereign debt instruments

6.6

—

6.6

10.2

—

10.2

Asset-backed securities

40.1

—

40.1

38.7

—

38.7

Corporate securities

235.3

235.3

U.S.

215.1

215.1

Foreign

35.6

35.6

Total debt available-for-sale securities

426.9

71.9

355.0

368.3

30.6

337.7

Money market funds

220.9

220.9

—

173.9

173.9

—

Trading securities

4.9

4.9

—

4.2

4.2

—

Total assets (1)

$
652.7

$
297.7

$
355.0

$
546.4

$
208.7

$
337.7

(1)         $~~210.1~~158.0 million in cash and cash equivalents, ~~$403.8~~$350.4 million in short-term investments, ~~$30.9~~$30.7 million in restricted cash, and ~~$7.9~~$7.3 million in other non-current assets on the Company’s ~~consolidated balance sheet.~~Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. There is an established hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability and are developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the assumptions about the factors that market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability.

The Company’s cash and investment instruments are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy based on quoted prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency.

·                  Level 1 includes financial instruments for which quoted market prices for identical instruments are available in active markets. Level 1 assets of the Company include money market funds and U.S. Treasury securities as they are traded in active markets with sufficient volume and frequency of transactions.

·                  Level 2 includes financial instruments for which the valuations are based on quoted prices for similar assets, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets. Level 2 instruments of the Company generally include certain U.S. and foreign government and agency securities, commercial paper, corporate and municipal bonds and notes, asset-backed securities, and foreign currency forward contracts. To estimate their fair value, the Company utilizes pricing models based on market data. The significant inputs for the valuation model usually include benchmark yields, reported trades, broker and dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers and reference data, and industry and economic events.

As of June 30, 2012 and during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the Company held no Level 3 investments. Level 3 includes financial instruments for which fair value is derived from valuation based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.
13

~~Table of Contents~~
~~JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(Unaudited)~~

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts

The Company has foreign subsidiaries that operate and sell the Company’s products in various markets around the world. As a result, the Company is exposed to foreign exchange risks. The Company utilizes foreign exchange forward contracts and other instruments to manage foreign currency risk associated with foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, primarily certain
15

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
short-term intercompany receivables and payables and to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows related to foreign-currency transactions.

The forward contracts, most with a term of less than 120 days, were transacted near month end; therefore, the fair value of the contracts as of both ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 is not significant. The change in the fair value of these foreign currency forward contracts is recorded as income or loss in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of Interest and other income (expense), net.

Note 8. Goodwill

The ~~Company’s~~following table presents the changes in goodwill ~~balance as of~~ ~~December 29, 2012 was $75.3 million, which consisted of $67.0 million of goodwill~~ allocated to the reportable segments (in the CommTest segment and $8.3 million of goodwill in the Optical Security and Performance Products (“OSP”) segment. The Company’s goodwill balance as of June 30, 2012 was $68.7 million, which consisted of $60.4 million of goodwill in the CommTest segment and $8.3 million of goodwill in the Advanced Optical Technologies (“AOT”) segment (see below). The goodwill balance is adjusted quarterly to record the effect of currency translation adjustments.millions):

Communication Test

Optical Security and

Test and Measurement

Performance Products (1)

Total

Balance as of June 30, 2012

$
60.4

$
8.3

$
68.7

Goodwill from GenComm acquisition (2)

5.7

—

5.7

Goodwill from Arieso acquisition (2)

40.4

—

40.4

Balance as of March 30, 2013

$
106.5

$
8.3

$
114.8

(1) During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the reporting structure of the ~~AOT~~Advanced Optical Technologies reportable segment (“AOT”) was reorganized and its previous reporting units, which consisted of the Custom Optics Product Group (“COPG”), Flex Products Group (“Flex”) and Authentication Solutions Group (“ASG”) (excluding the Hologram Business), were merged into the new ~~OSP~~Optical Security and Performance Products reportable segment (“OSP”), having one single reporting unit, replacing ~~the AOT segment.~~AOT. As the entire $8.3 million balance of AOT’s goodwill at June 30, 2012 was attributable to the Flex reporting unit, the Company reclassified AOT’s goodwill to ~~the OSP segment.~~OSP. The Company closed the sale of the Hologram Business, a component of the ASG reporting unit, during the second quarter of fiscal 2013. As there was zero goodwill attributable to the ASG reporting unit as of June 30, 2012, the sale does not impact goodwill. Refer to “Note 17. Operating Segments” and “Note 18. Discontinued Operations” for further information.
(2) Refer to “Note 5. Mergers and Acquisitions” for further information.

The Company reviews goodwill for impairment during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have occurred. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company completed the annual impairment test of goodwill, which indicated there was no goodwill impairment. There were no events or changes in circumstances which triggered an impairment review during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and ~~December~~March 31, ~~2011.~~2012.

Note 9. Acquired Developed Technology and Other Intangibles

The following tables present details of the Company’s acquired developed technology and other intangibles (in millions):

Gross

Gross

Carrying

Accumulated

Carrying

Accumulated

As of December 29, 2012

Amount

Amortization

Net

As of March 30, 2013

Amount

Amortization

Net

Acquired developed technology

$
543.5

$
(434.9
)
$
108.6

$
573.3

$
(449.3
)
$
124.0

Other

230.1

(198.8
)
31.3

245.0

(201.0
)
44.0

Total intangibles

$
773.6

$
(633.7
)
$
139.9

$
818.3

$
(650.3
)
$
168.0

Gross

Carrying

Accumulated

As of June 30, 2012

Amount

Amortization

Net

Acquired developed technology

$
534.8

$
(398.6
)
$
136.2

Other

279.3

(236.7
)
42.6

Total intangibles

$
814.1

$
(635.3
)
$
178.8

1416

Table of Contents

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the Company recorded ~~$16.8~~$20.1 million and ~~$37.4~~$57.5 million, respectively, of amortization expense relating to acquired technology and other intangibles.
During the three months ended September 29, 2012, the Company approved a plan to ~~terminate~~exit the concentrated photovoltaic (“CPV”) product line within ~~its~~the Communications and Commercial Optical Products (“CCOP”) ~~segment and accordingly recorded~~segment. As a result, during the period, the Company incurred a $2.6 million charge for accelerated amortization of ~~accelerated amortization.~~related intangibles which is included in Amortization of acquired technologies in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Refer to “Note 11. Restructuring and Related Charges” for more details.

During the three months ended March 30, 2013, the Company approved a strategic plan to exit the low-speed wireline product line within the CommTest segment. As a result, during the period, the Company incurred a $2.2 million charge for accelerated amortization of related intangibles, of which $1.8 million and $0.4 million is included in Amortization of acquired technologies and in Amortization of other intangibles in the Consolidated Statement of Operations, respectively.
During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2011,~~2012, the Company recorded ~~$20.8~~$19.8 million and ~~$40.2~~$60.0 million, respectively, of amortization expense relating to acquired technology and other intangibles.

Based on the carrying amount of acquired technology and other intangibles as of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, and assuming no future impairment of the underlying assets, the estimated future amortization is as follows (~~in millions~~)(in millions):

Fiscal Years

Remainder of 2013

$
33.3

$
18.4

2014

41.8

50.5

2015

33.9

43.1

2016

12.9

22.3

2017

9.6

19.0

Thereafter

8.4

14.7

Total amortization

$
139.9

$
168.0

The acquired developed technology and other intangibles balance are adjusted quarterly to record the effect of currency translation adjustments.

Note 10. Debts and Letters of Credit

The Company had short-term debt of ~~$205.6~~$159.6 million and $292.8 million as of ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively. The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants as of ~~December 29, 2012.~~March 30, 2013.

1% Senior Convertible Notes

On June 5, 2006, the Company completed an offering of $425.0 million aggregate principal amount of 1% Senior Convertible Notes due 2026. Proceeds from the notes amounted to $415.9 million after issuance costs. The notes bear interest at a rate of 1.0% per year and are convertible into a combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $30.30 per share. Interest on the notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year, beginning on November 15, 2006. The notes mature on May 15, 2026.

The holders of the notes may require the Company to purchase all or a portion of the notes on each of May 15, 2013, May 15, 2016 and May 15, 2021 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the purchase ~~date.~~date (“Recurring Put Right”). In addition, upon certain fundamental changes, holders may require the Company to purchase for cash the notes at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the purchase date. The Company may not redeem the notes before May 20, 2013. On or after that date, the Company may redeem all or part of the notes for cash at 100% of the principal amount of the notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date.

Upon adoption of authoritative guidance which applies to the 1% Senior Convertible Notes, the Company calculated the carrying value of the liability component at issuance as the present value of its cash flows using a discount rate of 8.1%, based on the 7-year swap rate plus credit spread as of the issuance date. The credit spread for JDSU is based on the historical average “yield to worst” rate
17

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
for BB-rated issuers. The carrying value of the liability component was determined to be $266.5 million. The equity component, or debt discount, of the notes was determined to be $158.5 million. The debt discount is being accreted using the effective interest rate of 8.1% over the period from issuance date through May 15, 2013 as a non-cash charge to interest expense. As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the expected remaining term of the 1% Senior Convertible Notes is less than one year and accordingly is classified as short-term debt.

The $9.1 million of costs incurred in connection with the issuance of the notes were capitalized and bifurcated into debt issuance cost of $5.7 million and equity issuance cost of $3.4 million. The debt issuance cost is being amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method from issuance date through May 15, 2013.

15

~~Table of Contents~~
~~JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(Unaudited)~~
InDuring the ~~first~~three and ~~second quarter of fiscal~~nine months ended March 30, 2013, the Company repurchased $50.0 million and ~~$50.0~~$150.0 million aggregate principal amount of the notes in each respective period for ~~$49.8~~$50.0 million and ~~$49.9~~$149.7 million in cash, respectively. In connection with these repurchases, the ~~two repurchases,~~Company recognized losses of ~~$2.1~~$0.7 million and ~~$1.3~~$4.1 million ~~were recognized~~ in accordance with the authoritative guidance in Interest and other income (expense), net ~~during the first and second quarter of fiscal 2013, respectively.~~in each respective period. After giving effect to the repurchases, the total carrying amount of 1% Senior Convertible Notes outstanding as of ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 was ~~$205.6~~$159.6 million.

As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the unamortized portion of the debt issuance cost related to the notes was ~~$0.2~~$0.1 million and was included in Other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The following table presents the carrying amounts of the liability and equity components (in millions):

December 29,

June 30,

March 30,

June 30,

2012

2012

2013

2012

Carrying amount of equity component

$
156.8

$
158.3

$
156.3

$
158.3

Principal amount of 1% Senior Convertible Notes

$
211.0

$
311.0

$
161.0

$
311.0

Unamortized discount of liability component

(5.4
)
(18.2
)

(1.4
)
(18.2
)
Carrying amount of liability component

$
205.6

$
292.8

$
159.6

$
292.8

Based on quoted market prices, as of ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, the fair market value of the 1% Senior Convertible Notes was approximately ~~$210.5~~$161.0 million and $307.3 million, respectively. Changes in fair market value reflect the change in the market price of the notes. The 1% Senior Convertible Notes are classified within Level 2 as they are not actively traded in ~~markets; and the~~markets. The bond parity derivatives related to the convertible notes are classified within Level 1 since the quoted market price for identical ~~instrument~~instruments are available in active markets. The fair value of the bond parity derivatives is approximately zero as of ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012.

The following table presents the effective interest rate and the interest expense for the contractual interest and the accretion of debt discount (in(in millions, except for the effective interest ~~rate~~)rate):

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

December 29,

December 31,

December 29,

December 31,

March 30,

March 31,

March 30,

March 31,

2012

2011

2012

2011

2013

2012

2013

2012

Effective interest rate

8.1
%
8.1
%
8.1
%
8.1
%

8.1
%
8.1
%
8.1
%
8.1
%
Interest expense-contractual interest

$
0.5

$
0.8

$
1.2

$
1.6

$
0.4

$
0.8

$
1.6

$
2.4

Accretion of debt discount

3.6

5.0

7.8

9.9

2.8

5.1

10.6

15.0

The increase of the debt related to the interest accretion is treated as a non-cash transaction and the repayment of the carrying amount of the debt is classified as financing activity.

Revolving Credit Facility

On January 20, 2012, the Company entered into an agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) for a five-year, $250.0 million revolving credit facility that matures in January 2017. ~~At the election of the~~The Company may elect to increase the principal amount available under the Credit Agreement ~~may be increased~~ by up to an additional $100 million which amount may be allocated as either an increase to the revolving loan commitments or as an add-on term loan, in each case subject to the conditions provided in the Credit Agreement. None of the lenders are currently obligated to provide such additional commitments or term loans. Borrowings under the credit facility bear an annual interest rate, at the Company’s option, equal to either (i) the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the applicable margin for base rate loans, which ranges between 0.75% and 2.00%, based on the Company’s leverage ratio or (ii) the Adjusted LIBO Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus the applicable margin for Eurocurrency loans, which ranges between
18

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1.75% and 3.00%, based on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Company is required to pay a commitment fee on the unutilized portion of the facility of between 0.25% and 0.50%, based on the Company’s leverage ratio.

Obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain wholly owned domestic subsidiaries of the Company (“the Guarantors”). The Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement have been collateralized by a pledge of substantially all assets of the Company and the Guarantors (subject to certain exclusions), full pledges of equity interests in certain domestic subsidiaries and partial pledges of equity interests in certain foreign subsidiaries. The Company has also agreed to maintain at least $200 million of cash and permitted investments in accounts which are subject to a control agreement.

16

~~Table of Contents~~
~~JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(Unaudited)~~
The Credit Agreement contains certain affirmative and negative covenants applicable to the Company and its subsidiaries, which include, among other things, restrictions on their ability to ~~(1)~~(i) incur additional indebtedness, (ii) make certain investments, (iii) acquire other entities, (iv) dispose of assets, (v) incur liens and (vi) make certain payments including those related to dividends or repurchase of equity. The Credit Agreement also contains financial maintenance covenants, including a maximum senior secured leverage ratio, a maximum total leverage ratio, a minimum interest coverage ratio and the requirement to maintain minimum liquidity.

The $1.9 million of costs incurred in connection with the issuance of the revolving credit facility were capitalized and are being amortized to interest expense on a straight-line basis over five years based on the contractual term of the revolving credit facility. As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the unamortized portion of debt issuance cost related to the revolving credit facility was ~~$1.5~~$1.4 million, and was included in Other current assets and Other non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

During the ~~quarter~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, there was no drawdown under the facility and the outstanding balance at quarter end was zero.

Outstanding Letters of Credit

As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the Company had 1516 standby letters of credit totaling ~~$34.5~~$33.9 million.

Note 11. Restructuring and Related Charges

The Company continues to seek to reduce costs through targeted restructuring events intended to consolidate its operations and rationalize the manufacturing of its products based on core competencies and cost efficiencies, together with the need to align its businesses with market conditions. As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the Company’s total restructuring accrual was ~~$9.1~~$6.1 million. During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013, the Company incurred restructuring expenses of $0.4 million and $6.1 million, respectively. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012, the Company incurred restructuring expenses of ~~$3.0~~$2.0 million and ~~$5.7 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2011, the Company incurred restructuring expenses of $4.0 million and $5.5~~$7.5 million, respectively. The Company’s restructuring charges can include severance and benefit costs to eliminate a specified number of positions, facilities and equipment costs to vacate facilities and consolidate operations, and lease termination costs. The timing of associated cash payments depend upon the type of restructuring charge and can extend over multiple periods.

1719

Table of Contents

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Summary of Restructuring Plans

The adjustments to the accrued restructuring expenses related to all of the Company’s restructuring plans described below for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 were as follows ~~(in~~(in millions):

Six Months
Ended

Non-cash

Three
Months
Ended

Balance

December 29,

Settlements

Balance

December 29,

June 30,

2012

Cash

and Other

December 29,

2012

2012

Charges

Settlements

Adjustments

2012

Charges

CommTest Wireless Business Restructuring Plan

$
—

$
1.8

$
(1.0
)
$
—

$
0.8

$
1.8

CCOP CPV Plan

—

0.6

(0.4
)
—

0.2

—

CommTest Operation and Repair Outsourcing Restructuring Plan

Workforce Reduction

$
3.9

$
1.5

$
(3.8
)
$
—

$
1.6

$
0.6

Facilities and Equipment

—

0.7

(0.7
)
—

—

0.2

Lease Costs

—

0.5

(0.3
)
—

0.2

—

Total CommTest Operation and Repair Outsourcing Restructuring Plan

$
3.9

$
2.7

$
(4.8
)
$
—

$
1.8

$
0.8

OSP Business Consolidation Plan

0.8

—

(0.6
)
—

0.2

—

CommTest Manufacturing Support Consolidation Plan (Workforce Reduction)

2.5

0.5

(2.0
)
—

1.0

0.4

CommTest Germantown Tower Restructuring Plan (Lease Costs)

0.5

—

—

—

0.5

—

CommTest Market Rebalancing Restructuring Plan (Lease Costs)

0.9

—

(0.2
)
—

0.7

—

CommTest US Manufacturing Outsourcing Restructuring Plan (Lease Costs)

1.1

—

(0.2
)
—

0.9

—

CommTest Germany Restructuring Plan (Workforce Reduction)

2.4

0.1

(0.3
)
0.2

2.4

—

Other plans

Workforce Reduction

$
0.4

$
—

$
(0.3
)
$
—

$
0.1

$
—

Lease Costs

0.1

—

—

0.4

0.5

—

Total other plans

$
0.5

$
—

$
(0.3
)
$
0.4

$
0.6

$
—

Total

$
12.6

$
5.7

$
(9.8
)
$
0.6

$
9.1

$
3.0

Ottawa Lease Exit Costs

$
4.6

$
0.2

$
(0.6
)
$
0.1

$
4.3

$
0.1

Nine

Three

Months

Months

Ended

Non-cash

Ended

Balance

March 30,

Settlements

Balance

March 30,

June 30,

2013

Cash

and Other

March 30,

2013

2012

Charges

Settlements

Adjustments

2013

Charges

Fiscal 2013 Plans

CCOP Outsourcing Plan (Workforce reduction)

$
—

$
0.9

$
(0.2
)
$
—

$
0.7

$
0.9

CommTest Wireless Business Restructuring Plan (Workforce reduction)

—

1.8

(1.7
)
—

0.1

—

CCOP CPV Plan (Workforce reduction)

—

0.5

(0.4
)
—

0.1

(0.1
)
Fiscal 2012 Plans

CommTest Operation and Repair Outsourcing Restructuring Plan:

Workforce reduction

$
3.9

$
1.3

$
(4.6
)
$
—

$
0.6

$
(0.2
)
Facilities and equipment

—

0.8

(0.8
)
—

—

0.1

Lease costs

—

0.5

(0.4
)
0.4

0.5

—

Total CommTest Operation and Repair Outsourcing Restructuring Plan

$
3.9

$
2.6

$
(5.8
)
$
0.4

$
1.1

$
(0.1
)
OSP Business Consolidation Plan (Workforce reduction)

0.8

—

(0.8
)
—

—

—

CommTest Manufacturing Support Consolidation Plan (Workforce reduction)

2.5

0.2

(2.3
)
—

0.4

(0.3
)
CommTest Germantown Restructuring Plan (Lease costs)

0.5

—

—

—

0.5

—

Other plans

0.2

—

(0.2
)
—

—

—

Fiscal 2011 Plans

CommTest Market Rebalancing Restructuring Plan:

Workforce reduction

$
0.1

$
—

$
(0.1
)
$
—

$
—

$
—

Lease costs

1.0

—

(0.3
)
—

0.7

—

Total CommTest Market Rebalancing Restructuring Plan

$
1.1

$
—

$
(0.4
)
$
—

$
0.7

$
—

Plans Prior to Fiscal 2011

$
3.6

$
0.1

$
(1.3
)
$
0.1

$
2.5

$
—

Total

$
12.6

$
6.1

$
(13.1
)
$
0.5

$
6.1

$
0.4

Ottawa Lease Exit Costs

$
4.6

$
0.3

$
(0.9
)
$
—

$
4.0

$
0.1

As of ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, the Company included the long-term portion of the restructuring liability of ~~$3.5~~$3.1 million and $4.0 million, respectively, as the restructuring accrual component under Other non-current liabilities, and the short-term portion as the restructuring accrual component under Other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company had also previously recorded lease exit charges, net of assumed sub-lease income in prior fiscal years related to its Ottawa facility, that ~~was~~were included in ~~selling,~~Selling, general and administrative expenses. The fair value of the remaining contractual obligations, net of sublease income, is ~~$4.3~~$4.0 million and $4.6 million as of ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012 respectively. The Company included the long-term portion of the contract obligations of ~~$3.3~~$3.0 million and $3.7 million in other non-current liabilities as of each period end, and the short-term portion in other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The payments related to these lease costs are expected to be paid by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2018.

Fiscal 2013 Plans
CCOP Outsourcing Plan
During the third quarter of fiscal 2013, Management approved a plan to transition certain functions related to the CCOP segment to an offshore contract manufacturer to align with its continuous efforts for supply chain optimization. As a result, a restructuring charge of $0.9 million was recorded for severance and employee benefits for 46 employees primarily in manufacturing, research and
20

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
development and selling, general and administrative functions. As of March 30, 2013, 4 employees have been terminated. The employees being affected are located in the United States. Payments related to remaining severance and benefits accrual are expected to be paid by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2015.
CommTest Wireless Business Restructuring Plan

During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, Management approved a plan to align the Company’s investment strategy in the CommTest segment with customer spending priorities in high growth product lines such as wireless network assurance and eliminate positions in research and development, sales and operations organization that supported low growth product lines. As a result, a restructuring charge of $1.8 million was recorded for severance and employee benefits for 4342 employees primarily in research and development and selling, general and administrative ~~functions. As of December 29, 2012, 38 employees have been terminated. The employees being affected are~~functions located in North America and Asia. ~~Payments~~As of March 30, 2013, 40 employees have been terminated and payments related to remaining severance and benefits accrual are expected to be paid by the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.

18

~~Table of Contents~~
~~JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(Unaudited)~~
CCOP CPV Plan

During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, Management approved a plan to terminate the CPV product line within the CCOP segment based on limited opportunities for market growth. ~~This action will occur over the next several quarters and affects~~As a result of this plan 10 employees primarily in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative ~~functions. The employees being affected are~~functions located in North America, Europe, and ~~Asia.~~Asia were affected. During the three months ended March 30, 2013, the Company reduced the accrual by $0.1 million for severance and employee benefits due to decreased obligation of remaining payments. As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, 9 employees have been ~~terminated. Payments related~~terminated and payments relating to remaining severance and benefits accrual are expected to be paid by the end of the ~~third~~fourth quarter of fiscal 2013.
Fiscal 2012 Plans

CommTest Operation and Repair Outsourcing Restructuring Plan

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, Management approved a plan which focuses on three areas in the CommTest segment: (1) moving the repair organization to a repair outsourcing partner; (2) reorganizing the R&D global team because of portfolio prioritization primarily in the Customer Experience Management (“CEM”) business to consolidate key platforms from several sites to a single site, and (3) reorganizing Global Sales to focus on strategic software growth, wireless growth and to ensure sales account resources on the most critical global growth accounts. This action will occur over the next several quarters and affected ~~133~~128 employees in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative ~~functions.~~functions and resulted in the exit of workspaces in Techpoint Singapore and Atlanta, Georgia. The fair value of the remaining contractual obligations, net of sublease income as of March 30, 2013, was $0.5 million. The employees being affected are located in America, Europe and Asia. As of ~~December 29, 2012, 107~~March 30, 2013, 117 of these employees have been terminated. During the three months ended ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the Company ~~adjusted~~reduced the accrual ~~for $0.6~~by $0.2 million ~~of additional~~for severance and employee benefits ~~arising from 22 employees added~~due to ~~the original plan.~~decreased obligation of remaining payments. Payments related to the severance and benefits accrual are expected to be paid by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2014.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, Management approved a plan to exit workspaces in Techpoint, Singapore and Atlanta, Georgia, primarily used by the CommTest segment. During the six months ended December 29, 2012, the Company exited both the workspaces. The fair value of the remaining contractual obligations, net of sublease income as of December 29, 2012, was $0.2 million. Payments related to the lease costs are expected to be paid by the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 and second quarter of fiscal 2014 for the leased sites in Techpoint, Singapore and Atlanta, Georgia, respectively.

OSP Business Consolidation Plan

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, Management approved a plan to consolidate and re-align the various business units primarily within its OSP segment to improve synergies. ~~This action will occur over the next several quarters and affected 16~~As a result of this plan 15 employees ~~primarily~~ in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative ~~functions. The employees being affected are~~functions located in the United States and ~~Europe.~~Europe were impacted. As of ~~December 29, 2012, 11~~March 30, 2013, all 15 of these employees have been ~~terminated. Payments related to the severance~~terminated and ~~benefits accrual are expected to be paid by the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2013.~~fully paid.

CommTest Manufacturing Support Consolidation Plan

During the third quarter of fiscal 2012, Management approved a plan to continue to consolidate its manufacturing support operations in the CommTest segment by reducing the number of contract manufacturer locations worldwide and moving most of them to lower cost regions such as Mexico and China. This action will occur over the next several quarters and affected 8077 employees in manufacturing and selling, general and administrative functions. The employees being affected are located in North America, Europe and Asia. As of ~~December 29, 2012, 53~~March 30, 2013, 62 employees have been terminated. During the three months ended ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the Company ~~adjusted~~reduced the accrual ~~for $0.4~~by $0.3 million ~~due to additional~~for severance and employee benefits ~~arising from 5 employees added~~due to ~~the original plan.~~decreased obligation of remaining payments. Payments related to the severance and benefits accrual are expected to be paid by the end of the ~~fourth~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2013.~~2014.
21

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

CommTest Germantown Restructuring Plan

During the second quarter of fiscal 2012, Management approved a plan to consolidate workspace in Germantown, Maryland, primarily used by the CommTest segment. As of December 31, 2011, the Company exited the workspace in Germantown under the plan. The fair value of the remaining contractual obligations, net of sublease income as of ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 was $0.5 million. Payments related to the lease costs are expected to be paid by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2019.
Other plans
Other plans account for an immaterial portion of the total restructuring accrual, with minimal or no revisions recorded.
Fiscal 2011 Plans

CommTest Market Rebalancing Restructuring Plan

During the third quarter of fiscal 2011, Management approved a plan for the CommTest segment to focus on higher growth products and services in lower cost markets with higher growth potential. This resulted in termination of employment, exit of three facilities and manufacturing transfer costs. As of June 30, 2012, all employees had been terminated. The fair value of the remaining
19

~~Table of Contents~~
~~JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(Unaudited)~~
contractual obligations with respect to the facilities exited, net of sublease income as of ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 was $0.7 million. Payments related to the lease costs are expected to be paid by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2016.

~~CommTest US Manufacturing Outsourcing Restructuring Plan~~Plans Prior to Fiscal 2011

~~During~~The restructuring accrual for plans that commenced prior to fiscal 2010, the Company exited facilities in Maryland and Indiana as part of its restructuring plan in the CommTest segment to reduce and/or consolidate manufacturing locations. The fair value of the remaining contractual obligations, net of sublease income, as of December 29, 2012year 2011 was ~~$0.9~~$2.5 million. ~~Payments~~Of this amount, $1.7 million is related to severance and benefits accrual for the lease costs are expected to be paid by the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2015 for its facilities in Indiana. Payments related the lease costs for its facilities in the state of Maryland were paid out as of December 31, 2011.
CommTest Germany Restructuring Plan
~~During~~ which commenced in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, the Company implemented a restructuring plan for its site in Germany in its CommTest segment to significantly change the overall cost structure and complexity of the site, and to align the cost of the site more with market demand. 77 employees in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative functions were affected by the plan. As of December 29, 2012, 74 employees have been terminated.2009. Payments related to the severance and benefits accrual are expected to be paid by the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016.
~~Other~~ The remaining balance consists of immaterial lease obligation accruals from various restructuring plans
~~Other plans account for a minor portion of the total restructuring accrual, with minimal or no revisions recorded.~~ that commenced prior to fiscal year 2011.

Note 12. Income Tax

The Company recorded an income tax expense of ~~$4.1~~$1.6 million and ~~$7.5~~$9.1 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, respectively. The Company recorded an income tax expense of ~~$3.0~~$3.1 million and ~~$6.4~~$9.5 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2011,~~2012, respectively.

The income tax expense recorded for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, ~~and December 31, 2011,~~ respectively, primarily relates to income tax in certain foreign and state jurisdictions based on the Company’s forecasted pre-tax income for the year in those locations.

The income tax expense recorded differs from the expected tax expense or benefit that would be calculated by applying the federal statutory rate to the Company’s income or loss before income taxes primarily due to the increases in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets attributable to the Company’s domestic and foreign losses from continuing operations.

As of ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits totaled ~~$62.6~~$61.1 million and $61.3 million, respectively, and are included in deferred taxes and other non-current tax liabilities, net. The Company had ~~$24.5~~$24.3 million accrued for the payment of interest and penalties at ~~December 29, 2012.~~March 30, 2013.
22

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 13. Stock-Based Compensation

Overview

The impact on the Company’s results of operations of recording stock-based compensation by function for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 ~~and December 31, 2011~~ was as follows (in millions):

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

December 29,

December 31,

December 29,

December 31,

March 30,

March 31,

March 30,

March 31,

2012

2011

2012

2011

2013

2012

2013

2012

Cost of sales

$
2.1

$
1.5

$
4.3

$
3.3

$
2.4

$
2.2

$
6.7

$
5.5

Research and development

3.4

3.1

6.3

5.7

3.7

3.1

10.0

8.8

Selling, general and administrative

8.1

7.7

15.6

14.8

9.2

8.0

24.8

22.8

$
13.6

$
12.3

$
26.2

$
23.8

$
15.3

$
13.3

$
41.5

$
37.1

Approximately $2.3 million of stock-based compensation was capitalized in inventory at ~~December 29, 2012.~~March 30, 2013.
20

~~Table of Contents~~
~~JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(Unaudited)~~

Stock Options

The Company issues stock options that generally become exercisable over a three-year or four-year period and, if not exercised, expire from five to ten years after the date of grant. The Company granted no stock options in the first ~~two~~three quarters of fiscal 2013 or fiscal 2012.

As of ~~December 29, 2012, $3.3~~March 30, 2013, $2.4 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to stock options remains to be amortized. That cost is expected to be recognized over an estimated amortization period of ~~1.2~~1.1 years.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company’s ESPP provides eligible employees with an opportunity to acquire an ownership interest in the Company at a discounted purchase price with a 6-month look-back period. The fair value of ESPP is estimated on the date of offering using a ~~Black-Scholes-Metron~~Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model.

As of ~~December 29, 2012, $0.2~~March 30, 2013, $0.9 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to the ESPP remains to be amortized. That cost is expected to be recognized through the ~~third~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2013.~~2014.

Full Value Awards

“Full Value Awards” refer to ~~Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)~~RSUs and Performance Units that are granted with the exercise price equal to zero and are converted to shares immediately upon vesting. These Full Value Awards are performance-based, time-based or a combination of both and expected to vest over one year to four years. The fair value of the ~~time-based~~time based Full Value Awards is based on the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of award.

For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, ~~and December 31, 2011,~~ the Company granted ~~5.5~~6.0 million and ~~4.4~~4.7 million RSUs, of which ~~0.7.million~~0.7 million and 0.5 million, respectively, are performance-based RSUs with market conditions (“MSUs”). These MSUs shares represent the target amount of grants, and the actual number of shares awarded upon vesting of the MSUs may be higher or lower depending upon the achievement of the relevant market conditions. The majority of MSUs vest in equal annual installments over three years based on the attainment of certain total shareholder return performance measures and the employee’s continued service through the vest date. The aggregate grant-date fair value of MSUs granted during the first ~~six~~nine months of fiscal 2013 and fiscal 2012 was estimated to be ~~$9.8~~$10.7 million and $9.3 million, respectively, and was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation. The remaining ~~4.8~~5.3 million and ~~3.9~~4.2 million shares for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 ~~and December 31, 2011~~ are mainly time-based RSUs. The majority of these time-based RSUs vest over three years, with 33% vesting after one year and quarterly over the remaining two years.

As of ~~December 29, 2012, $87.0~~March 30, 2013, $80.8 million of unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to Full Value Awards remains to be amortized. That cost is expected to be recognized over an estimated amortization period of ~~2.3~~2.2 years.
23

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Valuation Assumptions

The Company estimates the fair value of the MSUs on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo simulation with the following assumptions:

Six Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

December 29,

December 31,

March 30,

March 31,

2012

2011

2013

2012

Volatility of common stock

57.7
%
68.7
%

57.5
%
68.7
%
Average volatility of peer companies

58.3
%
68.4
%

58.3
%
68.4
%
Average correlation coefficient of peer companies

0.3214

0.3383

0.3208

0.3383

Risk-free interest rate

0.4
%
0.7
%

0.4
%
0.7
%

Note 14. Employee Defined Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors qualified and non-qualified pension plans for certain past and present employees in the U.K. and Germany. The Company is also responsible for the non-pension post-retirement benefit obligation of a previously acquired subsidiary.
21

~~Table of Contents~~
~~JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(Unaudited)~~
Most of the plans have been closed to new participants and no additional service costs are being accrued, except for the plans assumed during fiscal 2010 ~~and the first quarter of fiscal 2013~~ in connection with ~~acquisitions.~~an acquisition. Benefits are generally based upon years of service and compensation or stated amounts for each year of service.

On November 30, 2012, the Company terminated the defined benefit pension plan in South Korea and settled the vested benefit obligation of $1.3 million by subsequently funding a defined contribution retirement plan. The Company accounted for the termination of ~~Korean~~this pension plan as a combination of curtailment and settlement pursuant to the authoritative guidance, and recorded a gain of $0.2 million in its Consolidated Statements of Operations.

As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the U.K. plan was partially funded while the other plans were unfunded. The Company’s policy for funded plans is to make contributions equal to or greater than the requirements prescribed by law or regulation. For unfunded plans, the Company pays the post-retirement benefits when due. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the Company contributed $0.7 million to the U.K. plan. The funded plan assets consist primarily of managed investments.

The following table presents the components of the net periodic cost for the pension plans (in millions):

Pension Benefits

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

December 29,

December 31,

December 29,

December 31,

��
March 30,

March 31,

March 30,

March 31,

2012

2011

2012

2011

2013

2012

2013

2012

Service cost

$
0.1

$
0.1

$
0.2

$
0.2

$
0.1

$
—

$
0.3

$
0.2

Interest cost

1.1

1.3

2.2

2.7

1.1

1.3

3.3

4.0

Expected return on plan assets

(0.3
)
(0.3
)
(0.6
)
(0.7
)

(0.3
)
(0.3
)
(0.9
)
(1.0
)
Recognized net actuarial (gains)/losses

(0.1
)
—

(0.2
)

—

(0.1
)
—

(0.3
)
Curtailment/Settlement (gains)/losses

(0.2
)

(0.2
)

—

—

(0.2
)
—

Net periodic benefit cost

$
0.7

$
1.0

$
1.6

$
2.0

$
0.9

$
0.9

$
2.5

$
2.9

Both the calculation of the projected benefit obligation and net periodic cost are based upon actuarial valuations. These valuations use participant-specific information such as salary, age, years of service, and assumptions about interest rates, pension increases and other factors. At a minimum, the Company evaluates these assumptions annually and makes changes as necessary.

The Company expects to incur cash outlays of approximately ~~$6.4~~$6.3 million related to its defined benefit pension plans during fiscal 2013 to make current benefit payments and fund future obligations. As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, approximately ~~$3.5~~$5.0 million had been incurred. These payments have been estimated based on the same assumptions used to measure the Company’s projected benefit obligation at June 30, 2012.
24

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 15. Related Party Transactions

KLA-Tencor Corporation (“KLA-Tencor”)

During a portion of the first quarter of fiscal 2013, one member of the Board of Directors of JDSU was also a member of the Board of Directors of KLA-Tencor, a publicly held company which provides process control and yield management solutions for semiconductor manufacturing. KLA-Tencor is a customer of the Company. As of August 16, 2012, the member resigned from the Board of Directors of JDSU and KLA-Tencor was no longer a related party.

22

~~Table of Contents~~
~~JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(Unaudited)~~
Transactions and balances with the Company’s related parties were as follows (~~in millions~~)(in millions):

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

December 29,

December 31,

December 29,

December 31,

December 29,

June 30,

March 30,

March 31,

March 30,

March 31,

March 30,

June 30,

2012

2011

2012

2011

2012

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

2013

2012

Sales:

Receivables:

Receivables:

*KLA-Tencor

$
—

$
1.8

$
—

$
3.9

*KLA-Tencor

$
—

$
0.9

KLA-Tencor (1)

$
—

$
2.1

$
—

$
6.0

KLA-Tencor (1)

$
—

$
0.9

*(1) There were no material transactions between the Company and KLA-Tencor during the period when KLA-Tencor was a
related party of the Company in fiscal 2013.

Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies

Tax Matters

The Company ~~has~~had been subject to Texas franchise tax audits related to allocated taxable surplus capital for Texas report years 2002 through 2007. While the Company believes that it is reasonably possible this audit may result in additional tax liabilities, based on currently available information, the Company believes the ultimate outcome of this audit will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or overall trends in results of operations. There is the possibility of a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or overall trends in results of operations for the period in which this matter is ultimately resolved, if it is resolved unfavorably, or in the period in which an unfavorable outcome becomes probable. The range of the potential total tax liability related to these ~~matters is~~audits had been estimated to be from $0 million to $34.2 million, plus interest and penalties. During the three months ended March 30, 2013, the Company agreed to settle the audits for $0.1 million in total tax and interest.

Legal Proceedings

During the first quarter of fiscal 2012, the Company received an unfavorable arbitrator’s decision in a legal dispute unrelated to current or future quarters. The arbitrator’s decision was related to, and contrary to the result of, an action which commenced in 2006 in the Western District of Pennsylvania in which the Company was a nominal plaintiff. The Pennsylvania matter was resolved in the Company’s favor in 2009 and was subsequently affirmed by a Federal Appeals Court in January 2011. The ~~Company accrued $7.4 million during the first quarter of fiscal 2012, which included the~~ arbitration award ~~plus interest,~~was confirmed by the California State Superior Court in ~~accordance with authoritative guidance on contingencies and recorded an additional $0.2 million towards interest during the second quarter of fiscal 2012.~~October 2011. On March 5, 2012 the Pennsylvania District Court denied ~~JDSU’s~~the Company’s request to vacate the arbitration award, and the parties subsequently reached a settlement agreement on March 22, 2012 pursuant to which the Company paid $7.9 million on April 2, 2012 in full and final settlement of the matter. As of March 31, 2012, the Company had fully accrued for the amount based on final settlement agreement. The ~~related charge~~accrual for the three months and nine months ended March 31, 2012 is included as a component of ~~selling,~~Selling, general and administrative expense ~~during the three and six months ended December 31, 2011~~ in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company is subject to a variety of claims and suits that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. While Management currently believes that resolving claims against the Company, individually or in aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on its financial position, results of operations or statement of cash flows, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and Management’s view of these matters may change in the future. Were an unfavorable final outcome to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the period in which the effect becomes reasonably estimable.

Guarantees

In accordance with authoritative guidance which requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee. In addition, disclosures about the guarantees that an entity has issued, including a tabular reconciliation of the changes of the entity’s product warranty liabilities, are required.

The Company from time to time enters into certain types of contracts that contingently require the Company to indemnify parties against third-party claims. These contracts primarily relate to: (i) divestiture agreements, under which the Company may provide
25

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
customary indemnifications to purchasers of the Company’s businesses or assets; (ii) certain real estate leases, under which the Company may be required to indemnify property owners for environmental and other liabilities, and other claims arising from the Company’s use of the applicable premises; and (iii) certain agreements with the Company’s officers, directors and employees, under which the Company may be required to indemnify such persons for liabilities arising out of their employment relationship.

23

~~Table of Contents~~
~~JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(Unaudited)~~
The terms of such obligations vary. Generally, a maximum obligation is not explicitly stated. Because the obligated amounts of these types of agreements often are not explicitly stated, the overall maximum amount of the obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, the Company has not been obligated to make significant payments for these obligations, and no liabilities have been recorded for these obligations on its balance sheet as of ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012.

Product Warranties

In general, the Company offers a three-month to one-year warranty for most of its products. The Company provides reserves for the estimated costs of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. The Company estimates the costs of its warranty obligations based on its historical experience of known product failure rates, use of materials to repair or replace defective products and service delivery costs incurred in correcting product failures. In addition, from time to time, specific warranty accruals may be made if unforeseen technical problems arise with specific products. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liabilities and adjusts the amounts as necessary.

The following table presents the changes in the Company’s warranty reserve ~~(in~~(in millions):

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

December 29,

December 31,

December 29,

December 31,

March 30,

March 31,

March 30,

March 31,

2012

2011

2012

2011

2013

2012

2013

2012

Balance as of beginning of period

$
7.6

$
7.6

$
8.1

$
7.9

$
6.8

$
7.5

$
8.1

$
7.9

Provision for warranty

1.0

2.2

2.9

4.8

1.0

2.1

3.9

6.9

Utilization of reserve

(0.1
)
(0.2
)
(1.4
)
(4.6
)

(0.3
)
(1.5
)
(1.7
)
(6.1
)
Adjustments related to pre-existing

warranties (including changes in estimates)

(1.7
)
(2.1
)
(2.8
)
(0.6
)
Adjustments related to pre-existing warranties (including changes in estimates)

(0.7
)
(0.4
)
(3.5
)
(1.0
)
Balance as of end of period

$
6.8

$
7.5

$
6.8

$
7.5

$
6.8

$
7.7

$
6.8

$
7.7

Financing Obligations — Eningen, Santa Rosa and Payment Plan Agreement for Software Licenses

Eningen

On December 16, 2011, the Company executed and closed the sale and leaseback transaction of certain buildings and land in Eningen, Germany (the “Eningen Transactions”). The Company sold approximately 394,217 square feet of land, nine buildings with approximately 386,132 rentable square feet, and parking areas. The Company leased back approximately 158,154 rentable square feet comprised of two buildings and a portion of a basement of another building (the “Leased Premises”). The lease term is 10 years with the right to cancel a certain portion of the lease after 5 years. The gross cash proceeds received from the transaction were approximately €7.1 million.

Concurrent with the sale and lease back, the Company has provided collateral in case of a default by the Company relative to future lease payments for the Leased Premises. Due to this continuing involvement, the related portion of the cash proceeds and transaction costs, associated with the Leased Premises and other buildings which the Company continues to occupy, was recorded under the financing method in accordance with the authoritative guidance on leases and sales of real estate. Accordingly, the carrying value of these buildings and associated land will remain on the Company’s books and the buildings will continue to be depreciated over their remaining useful lives. The portion of the proceeds received have been recorded as a financing obligation, a portion of the lease payments are recorded as a decrease to the financing obligation and a portion is recognized as interest expense. Imputed rental income from the buildings sold but not leased back and currently being occupied is recorded as a reduction in the financing obligation.

As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, of the total financing obligation related to the Eningen Transactions, $0.1 million was included in Other current liabilities, and ~~$5.1~~$5.0 million was included in Other non-current liabilities. As of June 30, 2012, of the total financing obligation related to the Eningen Transactions, $0.1 million was included in Other current liabilities, and $4.9 million was included in Other non-current liabilities.

26

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Santa Rosa

On August 21, 2007, the Company entered into a sale and lease back of certain buildings and land in Santa Rosa, California (the “Santa Rosa Transactions”). The Company sold approximately 45 acres of land, 13 buildings with approximately 492,000 rentable square feet, a building pad, and parking areas. The Company leased back 7 buildings with approximately 286,000 rentable square feet.
24

~~Table of Contents~~
~~JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(Unaudited)~~
The net cash proceeds received from the transaction were ~~$32.~~2$32.2 million. The lease terms range from a ~~five year~~five-year lease with a ~~one year~~one-year renewal option to a ~~ten year~~ten-year lease with two ~~five year~~five-year renewal options.

The Company has an ongoing obligation to remediate environmental matters, impacting the entire site, as required by the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board which existed at the time of sale. Concurrent with the sale and lease back, the Company has issued an irrevocable letter of credit for $3.8 million as security for the remediation of the environmental matter that remains in effect until the issuance of a notice of no further action letter from the North Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board. In addition, the lease agreement for one building included an option to purchase at fair market value, at the end of the lease term. Due to these various forms of continuing involvement the transaction was recorded under the financing method in accordance with the authoritative guidance on leases and sales of real estate.

Accordingly, the value of the buildings and land will remain on the Company’s books and the buildings will continue to be depreciated over their remaining useful lives. The proceeds received have been recorded as a financing obligation, a portion of the lease payments are recorded as a decrease to the financing obligation and a portion is recognized as interest expense. Imputed rental income from the buildings sold but not leased back is recorded as a reduction in the financing obligation.

As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, $1.0 million was included in Other current liabilities, and ~~$28.0~~$27.7 million was included in Other non-current liabilities. As of June 30, 2012, $0.9 million was included in Other current liabilities, and $28.5 million was included in Other non-current liabilities.

The lease payments due under the agreements reset to fair market rental rates upon the Company’s execution of the renewal options.

Payment Plan Agreement for Software Licenses

During fiscal 2011 the Company capitalized approximately $7.1 million of cost incurred for the purchase of perpetual software licenses in accordance with the authoritative accounting guidance. The Company entered into a four-year payment plan agreement (“PPA”) with the supplier towards software licenses and technical support. Under this PPA, payments are made ~~on an annual basis~~annually starting the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The principal portion of the payment is accounted for as a financing activity and the remaining interest portion is accounted for as an operating activity in the statement of cash flows.

During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the Company recorded amortization expense of ~~$0.3~~$0.4 million and ~~$0.7~~$1.1 million in each period, respectively. During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2011,~~2012, the Company recorded amortization expense of ~~$0.3~~$0.4 million and ~~$0.7~~$1.1 million in each period, respectively.

Future Minimum Financing Payments — Eningen, Santa Rosa and Payment Plan Agreement for Software Licenses

As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, future minimum financing payments of the perpetual software licenses and financing obligations are as follows ~~(in~~(in millions):

Fiscal Years

Remainder of 2012

$
3.8

2013

5.6

Remainder of 2013

$
2.8

2014

3.7

5.6

2015

3.5

3.7

2016

3.5

3.4

2017

3.5

Thereafter

37.3

37.2

Total

$
57.4

$
56.2

27

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Note 17. Operating Segments

The Company evaluates its reportable segments in accordance with the authoritative guidance on segment reporting. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Thomas H. Waechter, is the Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) pursuant to the guidance. The CODM allocates resources to the segments based on their business prospects, competitive factors, net revenue and operating results.

25

~~Table of Contents~~
~~JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION~~
~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
~~(Unaudited)~~
The Company is a leading provider of communications test and measurement solutions and optical products for telecommunications service providers, cable operators, ~~enterprises~~ and network equipment manufacturers (“NEMs”)., and enterprises. JDSU’s diverse technology portfolio also fights counterfeiting and enables commercial lasers for a range of manufacturing applications.

Effective July 1, 2012, the reporting structure of the previous AOT business segment was reorganized and its previous reporting units, which consisted of COPG, Flex and ASG (excluding the Hologram Business), were merged into the new OSP business segment, having one single reporting unit, replacing the AOT business segment. The Hologram Business was previously presented within the AOT business segment; however, because it is presented as discontinued operations for financial reporting purposes as of September 29, 2012, it has been excluded from the segment results below.

The Company’s reportable segments are:

(i) Communications Test and Measurement Business Segment:

CommTest supplies instruments, software and services to enable the design, deployment and maintenance of communication equipment and networks as well as to ensure the quality of services delivered to the end customer. These solutions speed time-to-revenue by accelerating the deployment of new products and services, lower operating expenses and improve network performance and reliability. Included in the product portfolio are test tools, platforms, software, and services for wireless and fixed networks.

(ii) Communications and Commercial Optical Products Business Segment:

CCOP provides components, modules, subsystems, and solutions used by communications equipment providers for telecommunications and enterprise data communications. These products enable the transmission of video, audio, and text data over high-capacity, fiber-optic cables. The product portfolio includes transmitters, receivers, amplifiers, ROADMs, optical transceivers, multiplexers and demultiplexers, switches, optical-performance monitors and couplers, splitters and circulators.

CCOP also provides a broad laser portfolio that addresses the needs of OEM clients for applications such as micromachining, materials processing, bioinstrumentation, consumer electronics, graphics, medical/dental, and optical pumping. JDSU products include diode, direct-diode, diode-pumped solid-state, fiber and gas lasers.

(iii) Optical Security and Performance Products Business Segment:

OSP provides innovative optical security solutions, with a strategic focus on serving the anti-counterfeiting market through advanced security pigments, thread substrates and printed features for the currency, pharmaceutical and consumer electronic segments. OSP also provides thin-film coating solutions for 3D and gesture recognition applications.

The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 14, 2012. The Company evaluates segment performance based on operating income (loss), excluding certain infrequent or unusual items.

The amounts shown as Corporate consist of certain unallocated corporate-level operating expenses. In addition, the Company does not allocate stock-based compensation, acquisition-related charges and amortization of intangibles, restructuring and related charges, or non-operating income and expenses, or other non-recurring charges to its segments as highlighted in the table below.

2628

Table of Contents

JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Information on reportable segments is as follows (in millions):

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

December 29,

December 31,

December 29,

December 31,

March 30,

March 31,

March 30,

March 31,

2012

2011

2012

2011

2013

2012

2013

2012

Net revenue:

Communications Test and Measurement

$
195.4

$
196.2

$
364.9

$
381.4

$
174.2

$
177.8

$
539.1

$
559.2

Communications and Commercial Optical Products

185.8

163.2

380.7

343.5

179.2

173.1

559.9

516.6

Optical Security and Performance Product

48.2

50.2

104.7

100.8

Optical Security and Performance Products

51.9

52.4

156.6

153.2

Deferred revenue related to purchase accounting adjustment

—

(0.3
)
—

(0.6
)

—

—

—

(0.6
)
Net revenue

$
429.4

$
409.3

$
850.3

$
825.1

$
405.3

$
403.3

$
1,255.6

$
1,228.4

Operating income (loss):

Communications Test and Measurement

$
35.3

$
28.0

$
52.1

$
52.1

$
13.0

$
20.1

$
65.1

$
72.2

Communications and Commercial Optical Products

21.2

16.6

45.0

42.2

19.2

14.1

64.2

56.3

Optical Security and Performance Product

16.2

16.8

37.4

34.5

Optical Security and Performance Products

18.6

18.5

56.0

53.0

Corporate

(23.7
)
(21.4
)
(46.8
)
(42.4
)

(23.2
)
(23.5
)
(70.0
)
(65.9
)
Total segment operating income

49.0

40.0

87.7

86.4

27.6

29.2

115.3

115.6

Unallocated amounts:

Stock-based compensation

(13.6
)
(12.3
)
(26.2
)
(23.8
)

(15.3
)
(13.3
)
(41.5
)
(37.1
)
Acquisition-related charges and amortization of intangibles

(17.3
)
(21.1
)
(38.7
)
(40.8
)

(20.1
)
(19.8
)
(58.8
)
(60.6
)
Loss on disposal of long-lived assets

(0.1
)
(0.2
)
(1.4
)
(0.7
)

(0.2
)
(0.2
)
(1.6
)
(0.9
)
Restructuring and related charges

(3.0
)
(4.0
)
(5.7
)
(5.5
)

(0.4
)
(2.0
)
(6.1
)
(7.5
)
Realignment and other charges

(0.1
)
(1.5
)
(0.7
)
(9.3
)
Other non-recurring charges (1)

(12.9
)
(0.3
)
(13.6
)
(9.6
)
Interest and other income

(2.4
)
1.0

(2.8
)
2.0

(0.9
)
0.2

(3.7
)
2.2

Interest expense

(5.1
)
(6.6
)
(11.2
)
(13.2
)

(4.2
)
(6.9
)
(15.4
)
(20.1
)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

$
7.4

$
(4.7
)
$
1.0

$
(4.9
)
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

$
(26.4
)
$
(13.1
)
$
(25.4
)
$
(18.0
)
(1) During the three months ended March 30, 2013, the Company incurred $11.3 million of inventory related charges, included in Cost of sales, primarily related to a write-off of inventory no longer being sold due to a strategic plan to exit the low-speed wireline product line approved in the third quarter of fiscal 2013.

Note 18. Discontinued Operations

~~On September 18, 2012,~~During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company ~~entered into a definitive agreement to sell~~closed the sale of the Hologram Business, previously within the ~~previous~~ AOT reportable segment, to OpSec Security Inc. ~~in cash, subject to adjustment based on close date net working capital condition. On October 12, 2012, the transaction closed~~ and ~~the Company~~ received gross proceeds of $11.5 million ~~from the sale.~~in cash.

In accordance with the applicable accounting guidance for the disposal of long-lived assets, the results of the Hologram Business are presented as discontinued operations and, as such, have been excluded from both continuing operations and segment results for all periods presented.

Net revenue of the Hologram Business for the ~~three and six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 was ~~$0.3 million and~~ $5.2 ~~million, respectively.~~million. Net revenue of the Hologram Business for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2011~~2012 was ~~$3.5~~$5.9 million and ~~$8.5 million, respectively. Net income (loss) for the three and six months ended December 29, 2012 was net income of $0.8 million and net loss $1.0~~$14.4 million, respectively. Net loss for the nine months ended months ended March 30, 2013 was $1.0 million. Net loss for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2011~~2012 was ~~$2.5~~$1.2 million and ~~$4.7~~$5.9 million, respectively. There was no tax effect associated with the discontinued operation for any periods presented.

~~The~~During the nine months ended March 30, 2013, the Company recorded a gain of $0.6 million as a component of Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax on the Consolidated Statement of Operations in connection with the sale of the Hologram Business, calculated as follows (in millions):

Gross Proceeds

$
11.5

Less: carrying value of net assets

(10.6
)
Less: selling costs

(0.3
)
Gain

$
0.6

2729

Table of Contents
JDS UNIPHASE CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

The carrying value of the net assets sold as of October 12, 2012 are as follows ~~(in~~(in millions):

October 12,

2012

Accounts receivable, net

$
2.7

Inventories, net

4.4

Property, plant and equipment, net

0.8

Intangibles, net

5.8

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

(1.5
)
Other current and non-current liabilities

(1.6
)
Total net assets held for sale

$
10.6

~~The gain was recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax.~~

Note 19. Rescission Offer

During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company discovered it inadvertently failed to register the offer and issuance of shares under its ESPP with the SEC for the last three years. As a result, during the third quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company made a rescission offer to certain purchasers of securities under the ESPP ~~may have the right~~ to rescind their purchases for an amount equal to the purchase price paid for the securities plus interest from the date of purchase limited to the unregistered shares purchased inon January 31, 2012 and July 31, 2012. The rescission offer expired before the ~~last twelve months and still held by~~end of the ~~original purchasers, which is~~quarter. The payments to eligible plan participants as a result of the ~~applicable federal statute of limitations.~~rescission offer were immaterial. These shares have ~~always~~ been and continue to be treated as issued and outstanding for financial reporting purposes.
As of December 29, 2012, there were approximately 501,000 shares issued under the ESPP in the past twelve months and held by the original purchasers of such shares which may be subject to the recessionary rights, because the redemption features are not within the Company’s control. Of these, approximately 218,400 shares were originally purchased for $12.06 per share and the remaining shares were originally purchased for $9.35 per share. If holders of all of these shares had rescinded their purchases, the Company would be required to make aggregate payments of up to approximately $5.7 million, which includes estimated statutory interest. However, the actual impact to the Company’s cash position may be lower depending on the number of holders who accept the rescission offer and tender their shares. These shares were not reclassified out of permanent stockholder’s equity due to its immateriality. The Company also may be subject to civil and other penalties by regulatory authorities as a result of the failure to register these shares. The Company does not believe that the failure to register the shares or the planned rescission offer will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
On January 29, 2013, the SEC declared effective the Company’s registration statement on Form S-3 for the ESPP shares eligible for the rescission offer, and the Company will make a rescission offer to eligible plan participants who purchased shares in the past twelve months.
Note 20. Subsequent Events

Tender Offer to Repurchase ofOutstanding 1% Senior Convertible Notes

On ~~January 2,~~April 18, 2013, the Company ~~repurchased an additional $50.0 million aggregate principal amount~~filed a tender offer pursuant to the Recurring Put Right of its 1% Senior Convertible Notes ~~for $50.0~~to repurchase the outstanding $161.0 million aggregate principal amount of the notes in ~~cash.~~cash, at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest through May 14, 2013. The tender offer will expire on May 15, 2013.

2830

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A forward-looking statement may contain words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “can,” “can impact,” “could,” “continue,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “ongoing,” “plans,” “potential,” “projects,” “should,” “will,” “will continue to be,” “would,” or the negative thereof or other comparable terminology regarding beliefs, plans, expectations or intentions regarding the future. Forward-looking statements include statements such as:

· our expectations regarding demand for our products, including continued trends in end-user behavior and technological advancements that may drive such demand;
· our belief that the Company is well positioned to benefit from certain industry trends and advancements, and our expectations of the role we will play in those advancements;
· our plans for growth and innovation opportunities;
· our plans to continue to operate as a Company comprised of a portfolio of businesses with a focus on optical and broadband innovation;
· financial projections and expectations, including profitability of certain business units, plans to reduce costs and improve efficiencies, the effects of seasonality on certain business units, continued reliance on key customers for a significant portion of our revenue, future sources of revenue, competition and pricing pressures, the future impact of certain accounting pronouncements and our estimation of the potential impact and materiality of litigation;
· our plans for continued development, use and protection of our intellectual property;
· our strategies for achieving our current business objectives, including related risks and uncertainties;
· our plans or expectations relating to investments, acquisitions, partnerships and other strategic opportunities;
· our strategies for reducing our dependence on sole suppliers or otherwise mitigating the risk of supply chain interruptions;
· our research and development plans; and
· our expectations related to our products, including costs associated with the development of new products, product yields, quality and other issues.

Management cautions that forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks and uncertainties including those set forth in Part II, Item 1A “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in other documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Moreover, neither we assume nor any other person assumes responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are made only as of the date of this Report and subsequent facts or circumstances may contradict, obviate, undermine or otherwise fail to support or substantiate such statements. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Form 10-Q to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.

In addition, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K (except for Items 1, 1A, 6, 7, and 8) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, and our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 14, 2012.

OUR INDUSTRIES AND QUARTERLY DEVELOPMENTS

JDSU provides communications test and measurement solutions and optical products for telecommunications service providers, cable operators, and network equipment manufacturers. Our diverse technology portfolio also fights counterfeiting and enables commercial lasers for a range of applications.

To serve its markets, JDSU operates the following business segments:

·      Communications Test and Measurement (“CommTest”)
·      Communications and Commercial Optical Products (“CCOP”)
·      Optical Security and Performance Products (“OSP”)

2931

Table of Contents

Communications Test and Measurement

CommTest provides an integrated portfolio of advanced field test and lab instruments, customer experience management (“CEM”) tools and service-assurance solutions supported by monitoring software and optimization applications. This portfolio helps network operators and service providers effectively manage the continued growth of network traffic, devices and applications.

As a result of this continued and rapid growth, operators and providers are looking for new ways to drive business agility and generate revenue with innovative services, while continuing to focus on reducing operating costs and improving performance. To this end, CommTest is focused on providing world-class network and service enablement solutions, focusing investments on software and solutions offerings in high-growth markets while leveraging its instruments portfolio. These strategic investments are being placed globally to meet end-customer demand.

CommTest solutions address lab and production environments, field deployment and service assurance for Ethernet and IP services over ~~cable,~~ wireless and ~~fixed/telecom~~fixed communications networks. CommTest also provides protocol test solutions for the development and field deployment of storage and storage-network technologies. CommTest’s test instrument portfolio is one of the largest in the industry, with hundreds of thousands of units in active use by major network equipment manufacturers (“NEMs”), operators and services providers worldwide. CommTest is leveraging this installed base and knowledge of network management methods and procedures to develop advanced CEM and service-assurance solutions. Our CEM products let carriers remotely monitor performance and quality of service throughout the entire network. Remote monitoring decreases operating expenses, while early detection increases uptime, preserves revenue, and lets operators better monetize their networks. Service-assurance solutions address the entire scope of network monitoring from xDSL and Ethernet to mobile wireless, providing end-to-end visibility into customers’ quality of experience through continuous monitoring and correlation of service and network performance.

CommTest customers include ~~fixed~~wireless and ~~wireless~~fixed services providers, NEMs, government organizations and large corporate customers. These include major telecom, mobility and cable operators such as AT&T, Bell Canada, Bharti Airtel Limited, British Telecom, China Mobile, China Telecom, Chunghwa Telecom, Comcast, CSL, Deutsche Telecom, France Telecom, Telefónica, Telmex, TimeWarner Cable and Verizon. CommTest customers also include many of the NEMs served by our CCOP segment, including Alcatel-Lucent, Ciena, Cisco Systems, Fujitsu and Huawei. JDSU test and measurement customers also include chip and infrastructure vendors, storage-device manufacturers, storage-network and switch vendors, and deployed private enterprise customers. Storage-segment customers include Brocade, Cisco Systems and EMC.

During the third quarter of fiscal 2013, we acquired Arieso, a leading provider of location-aware software solutions that allow mobile network operators improve the subscriber experience. Also, during the third quarter of fiscal 2013, Management approved a strategic plan to exit the low-speed wireline product line, which resulted in a $2.2 million charge for accelerated amortization of related intangibles of which $1.8 million and $0.4 million is included in Amortization of acquired technologies and Amortization of other intangibles in the Consolidated Statement of Operations, respectively. In addition, we incurred $11.3 million of inventory related charges primarily related to the write-off of inventory no longer being sold due to the low-speed wireline product line exit included in Cost of sales in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
Communications and Commercial Optical Products

CCOP is a leading provider of optical communications and commercial laser products and technologies and commercial laser components.

Serving telecommunications and enterprise data communications markets, CCOP products include components, modules, subsystems, and solutions for access (local), metro (intracity), long-haul (city-to-city and worldwide), and submarine (undersea) networks, as well as storage access networks (“SANs”), local area networks (“LANs”), and Ethernet wide-area networks (“WANs”). These products enable the transmission and transport of video, audio and text data over high-capacity fiber-optic cables. CCOP maintains market-leading positions in the fastest-growing optical communications segments, including ROADMs and tunable XFPs and SFPs. CCOP’s growing portfolio of pluggable transceivers supports LAN/SAN needs and the cloud for customers building proprietary data center networks.
Gesture-recognition systems use both CCOP laser diodes and optical filters from the Company’s OSP business segment. These systems simplify the way people interact with technology by enabling the use of natural body gestures, like the wave of a hand, instead of using a device like a mouse or remote control. Emerging markets for gesture recognition include gaming, home entertainment and personal computing.

OEMs use CCOP lasers—fiber, diode, direct-diode, diode-pumped solid-state (“DPSS”), and gas—that offer low- to high-power output with ultraviolet (“UV”), visible and IR wavelengths. This broad product portfolio addresses the needs of laser clients in applications such as micromachining, materials processing, bio-instrumentation, consumer electronics, graphics, and medical/dental. Core laser technologies include continuous-wave, q-switched and mode-locked lasers addressing application needs from continuous-wave to megahertz repetition rates.

~~During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, CCOP terminated the CPV product line due to limited market opportunities.~~
3032

Table of Contents
Gesture-recognition systems use both CCOP laser diodes and optical filters from the Company’s OSP business segment. These systems simplify the way people interact with technology by enabling the use of natural body gestures, like the wave of a hand, instead of using a device like a mouse or remote control. Emerging markets for gesture recognition include gaming, home entertainment and personal computing.

CCOP’s optical communications products customers include Adva, Alcatel-Lucent, Ciena, Cisco Systems, Ericsson, Fujitsu, Huawei, Infinera, Nokia Siemens Networks, and Tellabs. CCOP’s lasers customers include Amada, ASML, Beckman Coulter, Becton Dickinson, Disco, Electro Scientific Industries, and KLA-Tencor.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2013, Management approved a plan to exit the concentrated photovoltaic (“CPV”) product line. As a result the Company incurred a $2.6 million charge during the period for accelerated amortization of related intangibles which is included in Amortization of acquired technologies in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Optical Security and Performance Products

OSP designs, manufactures, and sells products targeting anti-counterfeiting, consumer electronics, government, healthcare, and other markets.

OSP’s security offerings for the currency market include Optically Variable Pigment (“OVP®”), Optically Variable Magnetic Pigment (“OVMP®”), and banknote thread substrates. OVP® enables a color-shifting effect used by banknote issuers and security printers worldwide for anti-counterfeiting applications on currency and other high-value documents and products. OVP® protects the currencies of more than 100 countries today. OSP also develops and delivers overt and covert anti-counterfeiting products targeting the pharmaceuticals and consumer-electronics markets.

Leveraging its expertise in spectral management and its unique high-precision coating capabilities, OSP improves the performance of a range of products in the consumer-electronics market. For example, gesture-recognition devices designed for the gaming market use OSP bandpass filters. OSP also manufactures components for phase and polarization control that enhance contrast in home-theater projection systems. OSP also provides glasses and color filter wheels for 3D cinema applications.

OSP value-added solutions meet the stringent requirements of commercial and government customers in aerospace and defense. In the aerospace industry, JDSU precision optical filters are a critical component in satellite and spacecraft power- and temperature-control systems. OSP also supplies anti-reflection coatings, beamsplitters, optical filters, laser optics, solar reflectors, and mirrors for a variety of defense and security applications including guidance systems, high-energy laser systems, battlefield eye protection, infrared night-vision systems, and secure optical communications.

OSP serves customers such as 3M, Barco, Kingston, Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, Pan Pacific, Seiko Epson, and SICPA.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, JDSU completed the sale of the Hologram Business, which primarily addressed the transaction card market. JDSU has presented its current and historical Consolidated Statements of Operations and segment financials to reflect the sale of this business. The historical results of this business are reflected as discontinued operations in accordance with the authoritative guidance under US GAAP and are not included in quarterly JDSU results from continuing operations for all periods presented.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See “Note 2. Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements” regarding the effect of certain recent accounting pronouncements on our consolidated financial statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

For a description of the critical accounting policies that affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, refer to Item 7 on Management Discussion and Analysis in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 14, 2012.

3133

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The results of operations for the current period are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for future periods. The following table summarizes selected Consolidated Statements of Operations items (in millions, except for percentages):

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

December 29,

December 31,

Percentage

December 29,

December 31,

Percentage

March 30,

March 31,

Percentage

March 30,

March 31,

Percentage

2012

2011

Change

Change

2012

2011

Change

Change

2013

2012

Change

Change

2013

2012

Change

Change

Segment net revenue:

CommTest

$
195.4

$
195.9

$
(0.5
)

$
364.9

$
380.8

$
(15.9
)

$
174.2

$
177.8

$
(3.6
)

$
539.1

$
558.6

$
(19.5
)

CCOP

185.8

163.2

22.6

380.7

343.5

37.2

179.2

173.1

6.1

559.9

516.6

43.3

OSP

48.2

50.2

(2.0
)

104.7

100.8

3.9

51.9

52.4

(0.5
)

156.6

153.2

3.4

Net revenue

$
429.4

$
409.3

$
20.1

4.9
%
$
850.3

$
825.1

$
25.2

3.1
%

$
405.3

$
403.3

$
2.0

0.5
%
$
1,255.6

$
1,228.4

$
27.2

2.2
%

Gross profit

$
189.0

$
174.5

$
14.5

8.3
%
$
361.6

$
356.1

$
5.5

1.5
%

$
155.3

$
167.8

$
(12.5
)
(7.4
)%
$
516.9

$
523.9

$
(7.0
)
(1.3
)%
Gross margins

44.0
%
42.6
%

42.5
%
43.2
%

38.3
%
41.6
%

41.2
%
42.6
%

Research and development

63.5

58.9

4.6

7.8
%
125.1

118.2

6.9

5.8
%

65.8

62.0

3.8

6.1
%
190.9

180.2

10.7

5.9
%
Percentage of net revenue

14.8
%
14.4
%

14.7
%
14.3
%

16.2
%
15.4
%

15.2
%
14.7
%

Selling, general and administrative

105.4

105.3

0.1

0.1
%
210.1

215.6

(5.5
)
(2.6
)%

107.3

104.5

2.8

2.7
%
317.4

320.1

(2.7
)
(0.8
)%
Percentage of net revenue

24.5
%
25.7
%

24.7
%
26.1
%

26.5
%
25.9
%

25.3
%
26.1
%

Amortization of acquired technologies

14.6

15.4

(0.8
)
(5.2
)%
31.7

29.7

2.0

6.7
%

17.0

14.1

2.9

20.6
%
48.7

43.8

4.9

11.2
%
Percentage of net revenue

3.4
%
3.8
%

3.7
%
3.6
%

4.2
%
3.5
%

3.9
%
3.6
%

Amortization of other intangibles

2.2

5.4

(3.2
)
(59.3
)%
5.7

10.5

(4.8
)
(45.7
)%

3.1

5.7

(2.6
)
(45.6
)%
8.8

16.2

(7.4
)
(45.7
)%
Percentage of net revenue

0.5
%
1.3
%

0.7
%
1.3
%

0.8
%
1.4
%

0.7
%
1.3
%

Restructuring and related charges

3.0

4.0

(1.0
)
(25.0
)%
5.7

5.5

0.2

3.6
%

0.4

2.0

(1.6
)
(80.0
)%
6.1

7.5

(1.4
)
(18.7
)%
Percentage of net revenue

0.7
%
1.0
%

0.7
%
0.7
%

0.1
%
0.5
%

0.5
%
0.6
%

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

0.8

(2.5
)
3.3

(132.0
)%
(1.0
)
(4.7
)
3.7

(78.7
)%
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

—

(1.2
)
1.2

(100.0
)%
(1.0
)
(5.9
)
4.9

(83.1
)%
Percentage of net revenue

0.2
%
0.6
%

0.1
%
0.6
%

—
%
0.3
%

0.1
%
0.5
%

Net Revenue

Net revenue increased by $2.0 million, or 0.5%, during the three months ended ~~December 29, 2012 increased $20.1 million, or 4.9%,~~March 30, 2013 compared to ~~$429.4 million from $409.3 million during~~ the same period a year ~~ago,~~ago. This increase was primarily due to an increase in volume and demand in our CCOP segment in the current period, partially offset by a decline in net revenue in our CommTest and OSP segments, as described below.
CommTest net revenue decreased by $3.6 million, or 2.0%, during the three months ended March 30, 2013, compared to the same period a year ago. This decrease was driven by $12.3 million of net revenue decreases primarily from our Broadband and Networking and Media Access and Content product lines. These decreases were primarily due to (i) the wind-down of legacy wireline products, (ii) declines in average selling prices (“ASP”) as a result of increased competition within the Media Access Content product line and (iii) procurement delays at a key customer. This was partially offset by $8.7 million of net revenue increases primarily from our Mobility product line driven by new products from the acquisitions of Dyaptive and GenComm.
34

Table of Contents
CCOP net revenue increased by $6.1 million, or 3.5%, during the three months ended March 30, 2013, compared to the same period a year ago. This increase was driven by $22.2 million of net revenue increases primarily from our Pluggables, Solid State Lasers and Modulators product lines. These increases were primarily due to higher demand in the current period for new products that were released in the prior fiscal year and new customers in the current period. This was partially offset by $16.1 million of net revenue decreases primarily from our Fiber Lasers, Tunables and Amplifiers product lines. These decreases were primarily due to lower demand from key customers for these product lines and the timing of customer transition to newer products within our Fiber Lasers product line.
OSP net revenue decreased by $0.5 million, or 1.0%, during the three months ended March 30, 2013, compared to the same period a year ago. This decrease was driven by $3.3 million of net revenue decreases from our Consumer and Industrial product line primarily due to lower demand for display products, lower cyclical sales in window film products and reductions in 3D products in the current period. This was partially offset by $2.8 million of net revenue increases primarily from our Anti-Counterfeiting product line driven by higher demand for currency products.
Net revenue increased by $27.2 million, or 2.2%, during the nine months ended March 30, 2013 compared to the same period a year ago. This increase was primarily due to (i) an incremental increase in volume and demand in our CCOP segment in the current period, and (ii) the fact that the prior period reflected a reduction in CCOP net revenue of approximately $15 million due to the regional flooding in Thailand which temporarily suspended operations at one of our primary contract manufacturers, Fabrinet, and (ii) an incremental increase in volume and demand in our CCOP segment in the current period. Net revenue during the six months ended December 29, 2012 increased $25.2 million, or 3.1%, to $850.3 million from $825.1 million during the same period a year ago, primarily due to the aforementioned factors and, to a lesser degree, higher net revenue in our OSP segment,Fabrinet. This was partially offset by a decline in CommTest net ~~revenue.~~revenue, as described below.

CommTest net revenue decreased by ~~$0.5~~$19.5 million, or ~~0.3%, and $15.9 million, or 4.2%~~3.5%, during the ~~three and six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012, respectively. During~~March 30, 2013, compared to the ~~three months ended December 29, 2012,~~same period a year ago. This decrease was driven by $44.9 million of net revenue ~~decreased slightly~~decreases primarily from our Media Access and Content and Services product lines. These decreases were primarily due to the wind-down of ~~lower margin product lines which~~legacy wireline products and procurement delays at a key customer. This was partially offset by ~~growth in our mobility and broadband and networking product lines and~~$25.4 million of net revenue increases primarily from our Mobility product line driven by by new products from the ~~acquisition~~acquisitions of ~~Dyaptive. During the six months ended December 29, 2012 net revenue decreased in our instruments product portfolio, particularly in our cable~~Dyaptive and access product lines, primarily due to procurement delays at key customers and uncertainty in the macro-economic environment that reduced service providers’ spending, particularly in Europe and North America. This decrease was partially offset by growth in our mobility and broadband and networking product lines and net revenue from the acquisition of Dyaptive.GenComm.

CCOP net revenue increased ~~by $22.6~~$43.3 million, or ~~13.8%, and $37.2 million, or 10.8%~~8.4%, during the ~~three and six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012, respectively,~~March 30, 2013, compared to the same ~~periods~~period a year ~~ago,~~ago. This increase was driven by $68.1 million of net revenue increases primarily from our Pluggables, Modulators, Tunables and Solid State Lasers product lines. These increases were primarily due to (i) higher demand in the current period for new products that were released in the prior fiscal year, (ii) new customers in the current period and (iii) the recovery from the adverse impact of the regional flooding in Thailand ~~referenced above~~ in the prior ~~periods coupled with higher current~~ period ~~revenues due to the ramp up of new~~
32

~~Table of Contents~~
~~products in our Modulator, Pluggables and Tunables product lines compared to the same periods a year ago. These increases were~~as described above. This was partially offset by ~~a decline in~~$24.8 million of net revenue ofdecreases primarily from our ROADMs, Gas Lasers and Amplifiers product ~~line due to softness in industry~~lines driven by lower demand ~~and the timing of~~from key ~~customer programs.~~customers.

OSP net revenue ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$2.0~~$3.4 million, or ~~4.0%, and increased by $3.9 million, or 3.9%~~2.2%, during the ~~three and six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012, respectively. The decrease in~~March 30, 2013, compared to the same period a year ago. This increase was driven by $11.5 million of net revenue ~~during the three months ended December 29, 2012,~~increases primarily from our Anti-Counterfeiting product line driven by higher demand for currency products. This was ~~primarily due to declines in aerospace and defense product lines arising from reductions in government spending,~~ partially offset by ~~an increase in demand in consumer and industrial product lines. The increase in~~$8.1 million of net revenue ~~during~~decreases from our Consumer and Industrial product line driven by lower demand for commercial infrared products, lower cyclical sales in 3D and window film products and lower demand for gesture products in the ~~six months ended December 29, 2012 was primarily due to higher demand in currency products, partially offset by declines in aerospace and defense products.~~current period.

Going forward, we expect to continue to encounter a number of industry and market risks and uncertainties that may limit our visibility, and consequently, our ability to predict future revenue, profitability and general financial performance, and that could create quarter over quarter variability in our financial measures. For example, continued economic issues in Europe have led to uncertainty of demand in our CommTest and optical communications product portfolios and we cannot predict when or to what extent this uncertainty will be resolved. Our revenues, profitability, and general financial performance may also be affected by: (a) strong pricing pressures, particularly within our optical communications markets, due to, among other things, a highly concentrated customer base, increasing competition, particularly from Asia-based competitors, and a general commoditization trend for certain products; (b) high product mix variability, particularly in our CCOP and CommTest markets, which affects revenue and gross profit; (c) continuing service provider seasonality, which causes demand, revenue and profitability volatility at each level of the communications industry; (d) the current trend of communication industry consolidations, which is expected to continue, that directly affects our CCOP and CommTest customer bases and adds additional risk and uncertainty to our financial and business predictability; and (e) activities related to our program of contract manufacturing transitions in our CommTest segment that present additional supply chain and product delivery disruption risks, yield and quality concerns and risk of increased cost. These risks limit our ability to predict longer-term revenue, profitability and general financial performance.

35

Table of Contents
We operate primarily in three geographic regions: Americas, EMEA and Asia-Pacific. The following table presents net revenue by geographic regions (~~in millions~~)(in millions):

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

December 29,

December 31,

December 29,

December 31,

March 30,

March 31,

March 30,

March 31,

2012

2011

2012

2011

2013

2012

2013

2012

Net revenue:

Americas

$
214.1

49.9
%
$
206.3

50.4
%
$
423.9

49.9
%
$
414.0

50.2
%

$
194.1

47.9
%
$
187.1

46.4
%
$
618.0

49.2
%
$
601.1

48.9
%
EMEA

102.3

23.8

100.0

24.4

199.3

23.4

200.9

24.3

95.1

23.5

101.1

25.1

294.4

23.5

302.0

24.6

Asia-Pacific

113.0

26.3

103.0

25.2

227.1

26.7

210.2

25.5

116.1

28.6

115.1

28.5

343.2

27.3

325.3

26.5

Total net revenue

$
429.4

100.0
%
$
409.3

100.0
%
$
850.3

100.0
%
$
825.1

100.0
%

$
405.3

100.0
%
$
403.3

100.0
%
$
1,255.6

100.0
%
$
1,228.4

100.0
%

Net revenue is assigned to geographic regions based on customer shipment locations. Net revenue from customers in the Americas during the three months ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 ~~and December 31, 2011~~ included net revenue from the United States of $~~161.0~~144.1 million and ~~$159.3~~$148.9 million, respectively. Net revenue from customers in the Americas during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 ~~and December 31, 2011~~ included net revenue from the United States of ~~$324.9~~$469.0 million and ~~$328.8~~$477.7 million, respectively.

Net revenue from customers outside the Americas during the three months ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012 represented 52.1% and ~~December 31, 2011 represented 50.1% and 49.6%~~53.6% of net revenue, respectively. Net revenue from customers outside the Americas during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, represented 50.8% and ~~December 31, 2011, represented 50.1% and 49.8%~~51.1% of net revenue, respectively. We expect revenue from customers outside of North America to continue to be an important part of our overall net revenue and an increasing focus for net revenue growth opportunities.

33

~~Table of Contents~~
Gross Margin

Gross margin during the three months ended ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013, decreased 3.3 percentage points to 38.3% from 41.6% compared to the same period a year ago. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to inventory charges and accelerated amortization of acquired developed technology related to the strategic exit of the low-speed wireline product line and declines in ASP as a result of increased competition within the Media Access Content product line of CommTest. This was partially offset by an improvement in CCOP gross margin primarily due to higher revenue with a more favorable product mix and an improvement in yield in the current period.
Gross margin during the nine months ended March 30, 2013, decreased 1.4 percentage points to ~~44.0%~~41.2% from 42.6% compared to the same period a year ago. The ~~increase~~decrease in gross margin was primarily due to ~~savings obtained through~~ (i) ~~targeted restructuring activities~~charges related to ~~consolidate and rationalize business functions to achieve cost efficiencies~~the strategic exit from the low-speed wireline product line in ~~our CommTest segment, and~~the current period as referenced above, (ii) savings associated with our CommTest segment’s recent outsourcing of its repair operations, and its ongoing efforts to outsource manufacturing and reduce the number of its contract manufacturing partners. Additionally, product mix within our CommTest segment improved asCCOP net revenue, generated from higher margin products, particularly from our mobility and broadband and networking product lines, increased compared to the same period a year ago. This was partially offset as our CCOP segment, which yields lower gross margin generally than our other two segments, ~~generated $22.6 million more in net revenue and represented~~representing a higher percentage of consolidated net revenue in the current period compared to the same period a year ~~ago.~~
~~Gross~~ago, and (iii) an increase in amortization expense of acquired developed technology primarily due to recent acquisitions. This was partially offset by improvements in CommTest gross margin ~~during~~in the ~~six months ended December 29, 2012 decreased 0.7 percentage points~~current period primarily due to ~~42.5%~~(i) savings obtained through targeted restructuring activities to consolidate and rationalize business functions, (ii) savings associated with the recent outsourcing of our repair operations and ongoing efforts to outsource manufacturing and reduce the number of contract manufacturing partners, and (iii) a more favorable product mix as net revenue generated from ~~43.2%~~higher margin products, particularly from our Mobility product line, increased compared to the same period a year ~~ago primarily due to (i) CCOP’s higher percentage of consolidated net revenue in the current period~~, which yields lower gross margin as referenced above and (ii) a $0.8 million charge related to the write-off of inventory and a $2.6 million charge for accelerated amortization of acquired technologies related to the plan to terminate the CPV product line within CCOP. This was partially offset by (i) the cost efficiencies and savings referenced above, (ii) improved product mix and (iii) a favorable $1.9 million out-of-period adjustment recorded during the three months ended September 29, 2012, all within our CommTest segment.ago.

As discussed in more detail under “Net Revenue” above, we sell products in certain markets that are consolidating, undergoing product, architectural and business model transitions, have high customer concentrations, are highly competitive (increasingly due to Asia-Pacific-based competition), are price sensitive ~~and~~and/or are affected by customer seasonal and mix variant buying patterns. We expect these factors to continue to result in variability of our gross margin.

Research and Development (“R&D”)

R&D expense increased $3.8 million, or 6.1%, during the three months ended ~~December 29, 2012 increased $4.6 million, or 7.8%, to $63.5 million from $58.9 million~~March 30, 2013 compared to the same period a year ago. AsThis increase was primarily driven by a ~~percentage of revenue, R&D~~$5.3 million increase in labor and benefits expense ~~increased~~primarily due to ~~14.8% compared to 14.4%~~higher headcount associated with our continued investment in product development and a $0.6 million increase in stock-based compensation in the ~~same period~~current period. This was partially offset by a ~~year ago, as our R&D investment increases were proportionately higher than~~$1.8 million decrease in supplies expenses primarily due to a reduction in materials usage by CCOP in the ~~4.9% period-to-period increase in revenue.~~current period.

R&D expense increased $10.7 million, or 5.9%, during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012 increased $6.9 million, or 5.8%, to $125.1 million from $118.2 million~~March 30, 2013 compared to the same period a year ago. AsThis increase was driven by a ~~percentage of revenue, R&D expense increased to 14.7% compared to 14.3% in the same period a year ago, as our R&D investment increases were proportionately higher than the period-to-period~~$9.2 million increase in ~~revenue.~~labor and benefits expense primarily due to higher headcount as

~~For both the three~~36

Table of Contents
referenced above and ~~six months ended December 29, 2012, the dollar and percentage increases in R&D expense were primarily driven by~~ higher variable incentive ~~pay as~~compensation and a ~~result of improved operating performance, increased investments~~$1.2 million increase in ~~new network enablement product platforms for~~stock-based compensation in the next generations of communication networks and incremental on-going operating expenses from the acquisitions of Dyaptive and GenComm during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and September 29, 2012, respectively. The increasecurrent period. This was partially offset by ~~reductions~~a $1.4 million decrease in ~~R&D~~facilities expense primarily ~~related~~due to the exit from certain sites in connection with restructuring activities in our CommTest ~~segment.~~segment in the current period.

We believe that continuing our investments in R&D is critical to attaining our strategic ~~objectives, and~~objectives. We plan to continue to invest in R&D and new products that will further differentiate us in the ~~marketplace.~~marketplace and expect our investment in dollar terms to increase in future quarters.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”)

SG&A expense increased $2.8 million, or 2.7%, during the three months ended ~~December 29, 2012 increased $0.1 million, or 0.1%, to $105.4 million from $105.3 million~~March 30, 2013 compared to the same period a year ago. AsThis increase was primarily driven by (i) a ~~percentage~~$3.3 million increase in labor and benefits expense primarily due to higher headcount coupled with higher internal commissions and variable incentive compensation, (ii) $1.6 million of ~~revenue,~~ transaction costs related to the acquisition of Arieso and (iii) a $1.2 million increase in stock-based compensation in the current period. This was partially offset by a $2.6 million decrease in various other expenses such as facilities and bad debt expense in the current period.
SG&A expense decreased to 24.5% compared to 25.7% in the same period a year ago as revenue increased by 4.9%. The dollar change remained relatively flat for the current period, as higher variable incentive pay as a result of improved operating performance and incremental ongoing operating expenses from our Dyaptive and GenComm acquisitions were offset by ongoing expense reduction efforts and by a one-time benefit from a litigation settlement related to an insurance claim$2.7 million, or 0.8%, during the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012.~~
~~SG&A expense during the six months ended December 29, 2012 decreased $5.5 million, or 2.6%, to $210.1 million from $215.6 million~~March 30, 2013 compared to the same period a year ago. ~~As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expense decreased to 24.7% compared to 26.1%~~This decrease was primarily driven by (i) the absence in the s~~ame~~current period of a ~~year ago due to~~$7.9 million legal expense in the ~~dollar~~prior period associated with a litigation settlement, (ii) a $4.1 million decrease in various other expenses such as external legal expense and toexternal commissions in the current period and (iii) a ~~3.1%~~$2.0 million decrease in facilities expense in the current period. This was partially offset by (i) a $7.6 million increase in ~~revenue. The dollar decrease in SG&A~~labor and benefits expense ~~was~~ primarily due to ~~reductions~~higher headcount coupled with higher internal commissions and variable incentive compensation, (ii) a $2.0 million increase in ~~legal expenses, including charges~~stock-based compensation and (iii) $1.6 million of ~~$7.6 million recorded during the six months ended December 31, 2011~~transaction costs related to ~~a litigation settlement, and due to reductions~~the acquisition of Arieso in ~~various SG&A costs such as travel and acquisition-related activities. The decrease was~~the current period.

34

~~Table of Contents~~
~~partially offset by an increase in variable incentive pay as a result of improved operating performance~~.
We intend to continue to focus on reducing our SG&A ~~expenses~~expense as a percentage of revenue. However, we have in the recent past experienced, and may continue to experience in the future, certain non-core expenses, such as mergers and acquisitions-related expenses and litigation expenses, which could increase our SG&A expenses and potentially impact our profitability expectations in any particular quarter.

Restructuring and Related Charges

We continue to seek to reduce costs through targeted restructuring efforts intended to consolidate and rationalize business functions and related locations based on core competencies and cost efficiencies, to align the business in response to the market conditions. We estimate annualized cost savings of approximately ~~$23.1~~$26.5 million excluding any one-time charge as a result of the restructuring activities initiated in the past year. See “Note 11. Restructuring and Related Charges” for more detail.

During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013, we incurred restructuring and related charges of $0.4 million and $6.1 million, respectively. During the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012, we incurred restructuring and related charges of ~~$3.0~~$2.0 million and ~~$5.7~~$7.5 million, respectively.
During the ~~three and six months ended December 31, 2011,~~third quarter of fiscal 2013, we incurred restructuring and related charges of ~~$4.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively.~~
~~During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we incurred~~ $~~restructuring and related charges of $3.0~~0.4 million. The charges are a combination of new and previously announced restructuring plans and are primarily the result of the following:

·                  ~~During~~Management approved the ~~second quarter of fiscal 2013, our Company’s management (“Management”) approved a plan~~CCOP Outsourcing Plan to transition certain functions related to the CCOP segment to an offshore contract manufacturer to align with our investment strategy in CommTest with customer spending priorities in high growth product lines such as wireless network assurance and eliminate positions in research and development, sales and operations organization that supported low growth product lines.continuous efforts to improve supply chain optimization. As a result, a restructuring charge of ~~$1.8~~$0.9 million was recorded for severance and employee benefits for 4346 employees primarily in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative functions. As of ~~December 29, 2012, 38~~March 30, 2013, 4 employees have been terminated. The employees being affected are located in ~~North America and Asia.~~the United States. Payments related to remaining severance and benefits accrual are expected to be paid by the end of the ~~fourth~~first quarter of fiscal ~~2013.~~2015; and

·                  ~~We also incurred restructuring and related charges from previously announced restructuring plans in the second quarter~~This change was offset by a benefit of ~~fiscal 2013 related to the following: (i) $0.6~~$0.5 million ~~of additional~~for severance and ~~employee~~ benefits, ~~arising~~ primarily related to ~~adjust the accrual for~~ the CommTest Operation and Repair Outsourcing Restructuring Plan announced in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, ~~(ii) $0.4 million of additional severance and employee benefits arising primarily to adjust the accrual for the~~ CommTest Manufacturing Support Consolidation Plan announced in the third quarter of fiscal 2012.

37

Table of Contents
During the ~~second~~third quarter of fiscal 2012, we incurred restructuring and related charges of ~~$4.0~~$2.0 million. The charges are a combination of new and previously announced restructuring plans and are primarily the result of the following:

·                  ~~We had~~Management approved ~~a plan to re-organize the CEM business of CommTest to improve business efficiencies with greater focus on the mobility and video software test business, as well as~~ the CommTest ~~global operations to move to~~Manufacturing Support Consolidation plan for the CommTest Segment that resulted in a ~~full outsourcing model with initiative to lower costs. As a result, a restructuring~~ charge of ~~$1.8~~$2.7 million ~~was recorded~~towards severance and employee benefits, offset by a benefit of $0.7 million to adjust the accrual for previously restructured lease related obligations and a benefit of $0.2 million for severance and employee benefits ~~for approximately 57~~due to decreased obligation of remaining payments. This plan continues Management’s efforts to consolidate our manufacturing support operations, by reducing the number of contract manufacturer locations worldwide and moving them to lower cost regions such as Mexico and China. This action affected 77 employees in manufacturing, research and development and selling, general and administrative functions. ~~As of December 29, 2012, all employees have been terminated. The employees being affected were located in North America, Europe and Asia.~~ Payments related to ~~remaining~~ severance and benefits accrual ~~expected to be paid by the end of third quarter of fiscal 2013.~~
·We partially exited the workspace facility in Germantown, Maryland, primarily used by CommTest in the second quarter of fiscal 2012. We had accrued $0.6 million exit costs in accordance with authoritative guidance related to lease and contract terminations. Payments related to lease costs are expected to be paid by the end of ~~second~~the first quarter of fiscal ~~2019.~~
·In the second quarter of fiscal 2012, we exited all the facilities under the CommTest Market Rebalancing Restructuring Plan approved by the Management in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. We had accrued $0.9 million exit costs in accordance with authoritative guidance related to lease and contract terminations. Payments related to lease costs are expected to be paid by the end of second quarter of fiscal 2016.
35

~~Table of Contents~~2014.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, we recorded ~~$5.7~~$6.1 million in restructuring and related charges. The charges are a combination of new and previously announced restructuring plans and are primarily the result of the following:

·                  $~~2.4~~3.2 million for severance and benefits ~~for~~related to the CCOP Outsourcing Plan announced in the current quarter, the CommTest Wireless Business Plan announced in the ~~current~~second quarter of fiscal 2013, and the CCOP CPV plan announced during the first quarter of fiscal 2013 and ~~$2.1~~$1.6 million of additional severance and employee benefits arising primarily to adjust the accrual for the CommTest Operation and Repair Outsourcing Restructuring and the CommTest Manufacturing Support Consolidation plans announced in the fourth and third quarters of fiscal 2012, ~~respectively.~~respectively;

·                  $~~0.7~~0.8 million for transfer costs and lease construction costs in CommTest which ~~was~~were the result of the repair outsourcing initiative announced by Management during the fourth quarter of fiscal ~~2012.~~2012; and

·                  $0.5 million for the exit of two leased sites in CommTest for the plan announced during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2011,~~2012, we recorded ~~$5.5~~$7.5 million in restructuring and related charges. The charges are a combination of new and previously announced restructuring plans and are primarily the result of the following:

·                  $~~2.5~~5.1 million ~~consisting of $3.4 million~~for severance and benefits, net of adjustments, primarily ~~for~~related to the CommTest Manufacturing Support Consolidation Plan announced in the current quarter, the CommTest Solutions Business Restructuring Plan announced in the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the CCOP segment restructuring plan announced in the first quarter of fiscal 2012, and the continued implementation of the CommTest Germany Restructuring Plan, offset by a benefit of $0.9 million arising primarily to adjust the accrual for restructuring plans announced in the third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2011 in the CommTest segment that did not materialize due to Management’s decision to re-locate employees and realize co-location efficiencies.Plan;

·                  $~~1.4~~1.5 million for manufacturing transfer costs in the CommTest and ~~OSP~~the previous AOT segment which were the result of the transfer of certain production processes into existing sites in the ~~U.S.~~United States, or to contract ~~manufacturers.~~manufacturers; and

·                  $~~1.7~~0.9 million for lease exit costs consisting of a $1.7 million charge from exiting three of the facilities under the CommTest Market Rebalancing Plan announced in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and the facility under the CommTest ~~workspace~~Germantown Tower Plan announced in ~~Germantown, Maryland.~~the second quarter of fiscal 2012, offset by a benefit of $0.8 million arising primarily to adjust the accrual for previously restructured lease related obligations.

Our restructuring and other lease exit cost obligations are net of sublease income or lease settlement estimates of approximately ~~$3.8~~$3.6 million. Our ability to generate sublease income, as well as our ability to terminate lease obligations and recognize the anticipated related savings, is highly dependent upon the economic conditions, particularly commercial real estate market conditions in certain geographies, at the time we negotiate the lease termination and sublease arrangements with third parties as well as the performances by such third parties of their respective obligations. While the amount we have accrued represents the best estimate of the remaining obligations we expect to incur in connection with these plans, estimates are subject to change. Routine adjustments are required and may be required in the future as conditions and facts change through the implementation period. If adverse macroeconomic conditions continue, particularly as they pertain to the commercial real estate market, or if, for any reason, tenants under subleases fail to perform their obligations, we may be required to reduce estimated future sublease income and adjust the estimated amounts of future settlement agreements, and accordingly, increase estimated costs to exit certain facilities. Amounts related to the lease expense, net of anticipated sublease proceeds, will be paid over the respective lease terms through fiscal 2019.

Interest and Other Income (Expense), Net

~~During the three months ended December 29, 2012, interest~~Interest and other income (expense), net decreased ~~$3.4~~by $1.1 million during the three months ended March 30, 2013 compared to ~~an expense of $2.4 million from income of $1.0 million during~~ the same period a year ago, primarily due to foreign exchange loss and loss realized, in accordance with the authoritative guidance, in connection with repurchase of $50.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 1% Senior Convertible Notes at ~~prices below~~ par in the current period.

~~During the six months ended December 29, 2012, interest~~38

Table of Contents
Interest and other income (expense), net decreased ~~$4.8~~by $5.9 million during the nine months ended March 30, 2013, compared to ~~an expense of $2.8 million from income of $2.0 million during~~ the same period a year ago, primarily due to ~~losses~~loss realized, in accordance with the authoritative guidance, in connection with ~~repurchases~~repurchase of ~~$100.0~~$150.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 1% Senior Convertible Notes at prices at or below par in the current period.

Interest Expense

~~During~~Interest expense decreased by $2.7 million during the three months ended ~~December 29, 2012, interest expense decreased $1.5 million~~March 30, 2013 compared to ~~$5.1 million from $6.6 million during~~ the same period a year ago. ~~During~~Interest expense decreased by $4.7 million during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012, interest expense decreased $2.0 million~~March 30, 2013, compared to ~~$11.2~~
36

~~Table of Contents~~
~~million from $13.2 million during~~ the same period a year ago. The decreases in interest expense for both the three and ~~six~~nine month periods, were primarily due to repurchases of ~~$114.0~~$164.0 million of the aggregate principal amount of our 1% Senior Convertible Notes subsequent to the three months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2011.~~2012.

Provision for Income Tax

We recorded an income tax expense of ~~$4.1~~$1.6 million and ~~$7.5~~$9.1 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012, respectively, and~~March 30, 2013, respectively. We recorded an income tax expense of ~~$3.0~~$3.1 million and ~~$6.4~~$9.5 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2011,~~2012, respectively.
The income tax expense recorded for the three and nine months ended March 30, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively, ~~in all cases~~ primarily ~~relating~~relates to income tax in certain foreign and state jurisdictions based on our forecasted pre-tax income for the year in those locations.

The income tax expense recorded differs from the expected tax expense or benefit that would be calculated by applying the federal statutory rate to our income or loss before income taxes primarily due to the increases in valuation allowance for deferred tax assets attributable to our domestic and foreign losses from continuing operations.

As of ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, our unrecognized tax benefits totaled ~~$62.6~~$61.1 million and $61.3 million, respectively, and are included in deferred taxes and other non-current tax liabilities, net. We had ~~$24.5~~$24.3 million accrued for the payment of interest and penalties at ~~December 29, 2012.~~March 30, 2013.

Discontinued Operations

~~On September 18, 2012,~~ During the second quarter of fiscal 2013, we ~~entered into a definitive agreement to sell~~completed the sale of the Hologram Business within the previous AOT reportable segment to OpSec Security Inc. ~~for~~and received gross proceeds of $11.5 million in cash, subject to an earn-out clause. Based on an assessment to be performed following the one-year period subsequent to the closing date (the “earn-out period”), the buyer may be required to pay up to a maximum additional amount of $4.0 million contingent on the Hologram Business exceeding a pre-determined revenue target during the earn-out period. No amount related to the earn-out clause will be recognized unless it is realized or realizable, in accordance with authoritative guidance. If any amount related to the earn-out clause meets the recognition criteria it will be included as a component of discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. ~~On October 12, 2012, the transaction closed and we received gross proceeds of $11.5 million from the sale.~~ We recorded a gain of $0.6 million in connection with the sale during the ~~three and six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012.~~March 30, 2013.

Net revenue of the Hologram Business for the ~~three and six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 was ~~$0.3 million and~~ $5.2 ~~million, respectively.~~million. Net revenue of the Hologram Business for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2011~~2012 was ~~$3.5~~$5.9 million and ~~$8.5 million, respectively. Net income (loss) for the three and six months ended December 29, 2012 was net income of $0.8 million and net loss $1.0~~$14.4 million, respectively. Net loss for the nine months ended March 30, 2013 was $1.0 million. Net loss for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2011~~2012 was ~~$2.5~~$1.2 million and ~~$4.7~~$5.9 million, respectively. There was no tax effect associated with the discontinued operation for any periods presented.

3739

Table of Contents

Operating Segment Information (in millions)

Three Months Ended

Six Months Ended

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

December 29,

December 31,

Percentage

December 29,

December 31,

Percentage

March 30,

March 31,

Percentage

March 30,

March 31,

Percentage

2012

2011

Change

Change

2012

2011

Change

Change

2013

2012

Change

Change

2013

2012

Change

Change

CommTest

Net revenue

$
195.4

$
195.9

$
(0.5
)
(0.3
)%
$
364.9

$
380.8

$
(15.9
)
(4.2
)%

$
174.2

$
177.8

$
(3.6
)
(2.0
)%
$
539.1

$
558.6

$
(19.5
)
(3.5
)%
Operating income

35.3

28.0

7.3

26.1
%
52.1

52.1

—

—
%

13.0

20.1

(7.1
)
(35.3
)%
65.1

72.2

(7.1
)
(9.8
)%
Operating margin

18.1
%
14.3
%

14.3
%
13.7
%

7.5
%
11.3
%

12.1
%
12.9
%

CCOP

Net revenue

185.8

163.2

22.6

13.8
%
380.7

343.5

37.2

10.8
%

179.2

173.1

6.1

3.5
%
559.9

516.6

43.3

8.4
%
Operating income

21.2

16.6

4.6

27.7
%
45.0

42.2

2.8

6.6
%

19.2

14.1

5.1

36.2
%
64.2

56.3

7.9

14.0
%
Operating margin

11.4
%
10.2
%

11.8
%
12.3
%

10.7
%
8.1
%

11.5
%
10.9
%

OSP

Net revenue

48.2

50.2

(2.0
)
(4.0
)%
104.7

100.8

3.9

3.9
%

51.9

52.4

(0.5
)
(1.0
)%
156.6

153.2

3.4

2.2
%
Operating income

16.2

16.8

(0.6
)
(3.6
)%
37.4

34.5

2.9

8.4
%

18.6

18.5

0.1

0.5
%
56.0

53.0

3.0

5.7
%
Operating margin

33.6
%
33.5
%

35.7
%
34.2
%

35.8
%
35.3
%

35.8
%
34.6
%

CommTest

CommTest operating margin decreased 3.8 percentage points during the three months ended ~~December 29, 2012 increased 3.8 percentage points~~March 30, 2013 to ~~18.1%~~7.5% from ~~14.3% compared to the same period a year ago. The increase was primarily due to gross margin improvements~~ gained through (i) targeted restructuring activities to consolidate and rationalize business functions to achieve cost efficiencies, (ii) savings associated with CommTest’s recent outsourcing of its repair operations, and its ongoing efforts to outsource manufacturing and reduce the number of its contract manufacturing partners, (iii) improved product mix, and (iv) and reductions in various other SG&A expenses compared to the same period a year ago. This was partially offset by (i) an increase in R&D expense primarily related to an increase in variable incentive pay and increased investment in new product platforms and (ii) a slight decrease in net revenue.
CommTest operating margin during the six months ended December 29, 2012 increased 0.6 percentage points to 14.3% from 13.7% compared to the same period a year ago. The increase was primarily due to (i) the cost efficiencies and savings referenced above, (ii) a favorable $1.9 million out-of-period adjustment recorded during the three months ended September 29, 2012 and (iii) various reductions in SG&A expense, such as reduced information technology expenses due to the completion of infrastructure projects in fiscal 2012, reduced sales commissions as a result of decreased net revenue and reductions in travel expense. This was partially offset by (i) an increase in R&D expense primarily related to an increase in variable incentive pay and increased investment in new product platforms and (ii) a 4.2% reduction in net revenue in the current period.
~~CCOP~~
CCOP operating margin during the three months ended December 29, 2012 increased 1.2 percentage points to 11.4% from 10.2% compared to the same period a year ago due primarily to a $22.6 million increase in net revenue as noted above, partially offset by increased R&D expense driven by higher headcount with higher variable incentive pay.
~~CCOP operating margin during the six months ended December 29, 2012 decreased 0.5 percentage points to 11.8% from 12.3%~~11.3% compared to the same period a year ago. The decrease was primarily driven by a decline in gross margin and a 2.0% decrease in net revenue in the current period as referenced above.
CommTest operating margin decreased 0.8 percentage points during the nine months ended March 30, 2013 to 12.1% from 12.9% compared to the same period a year ago. The decrease was primarily driven by a 3.5% decrease in net revenue as referenced above, partially offset by an improvement in gross margin primarily due to cost savings and a more favorable product mix as referenced above.
CCOP
CCOP operating margin increased 2.6 percentage points during the three months ended March 30, 2013 to 10.7% from 8.1% compared to the same period a year ago. The increase in operating margin was primarily driven by an improvement in gross margin due to a ~~less~~more favorable product mix ~~within our optical communications product line~~and an improvement in ~~addition to~~yield in the current period. This was partially offset by an increase in R&D expense primarily due to higher headcount and a reduction in R&D expense offsets from joint product development projects in the current period.
CCOP operating margin increased 0.6 percentage points during the nine months ended March 30, 2013 to 11.5% from 10.9% compared to the same period a year ago. The increase in operating margin was primarily driven by ~~higher headcount with higher variable incentive pay. This decrease was partially offset by a substantial~~an 8.4% increase in net revenue as ~~noted above.~~
38

~~Table of Contents~~referenced above and by an improvement in gross margin due to a more favorable product mix and an improvement in yield in the current period. This was partially offset by an increase in R&D and SG&A expense primarily due to higher headcount and variable incentive compensation in the current period.

OSP

OSP operating margin increased 0.5 percentage points during the three months ended ~~December 29, 2012 increased 0.1 percentage points~~March 30, 2013 to ~~33.6%~~35.8% from ~~33.5%~~35.3% compared to the same period a year ago. The increase in operating margin was primarily driven by an improvement in gross margin due to a more favorable product mix and lower inventory excess and obsolescence charges in the current period.
OSP operating margin increased 1.2 percentage points during the nine months ended March 30, 2013 to 35.8% from 34.6% compared to the same period a year ago. The increase in operating margin was primarily driven by a ~~reduction~~decrease in SG&A expense ~~which included~~due to a one-time benefit from a litigation settlement related to an insurance claim ~~that occurred during the three months ended December 29, 2012. This increase was offset~~and by a ~~decline in gross margin as a result of unfavorable manufacturing variances and under-utilization of factory overhead in addition to an~~2.2% increase in ~~variable incentive pay due to improved operating performance.~~
~~OSP operating margin during~~revenue as referenced above in the six months ended December 29, 2012 increased 1.5 percentage points to 35.7% from 34.2% compared to the same period a year ago. The increase was driven by a reduction in SG&A expense which included a one-time benefit from a litigation settlement related to an insurance claim that occurred during the three months ended December 29, 2012 coupled with an increase in net revenue due to higher demand in currency products whichcurrent period. This was partially offset by ~~declines~~an increase in ~~aerospace and defense products.~~R&D expense in the current period.
40

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash investments are made in accordance with an investment policy approved by the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. In general, our investment policy requires that securities purchased be rated A-1/P-1, A/A2 or better. In November, 2012, the policy was amended to allow an allocation to securities rated A-2/P-2, BBB/Baa2 or better, with such allocation not to exceed 10% of any investment portfolio. Securities that are downgraded subsequent to purchase are evaluated and may be sold or held at Management’s discretion. No security may have an effective maturity that exceeds 37 months, and the average duration of our holdings may not exceed 18 months. At any time, no more than 5% of the investment portfolio may be concentrated in a single issuer other than the U.S. or sovereign governments or agencies. Our investments in debt securities and marketable equity securities are primarily classified as available-for-sale investments or trading assets and are recorded at fair value. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments are reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. We did not hold any investments in auction rate securities, mortgage backed securities, collateralized debt obligations, or variable rate demand notes at ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and virtually all debt securities held were of investment grade (at least BBB-/Baa3). As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, approximately ~~83.9%~~80.1% of our cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash were held in the U.S.

As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the majority of our cash investments have maturities of 90 days or less and are of high credit quality. Although we intend to hold these investments to maturity, in the event that we are required to sell any of these securities under adverse market conditions, losses could be recognized on such sales. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, we have not realized material investment losses but can provide no assurance that the value or the liquidity of our other investments will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the financial markets. In addition, we maintain cash balances in operating accounts that are with third party financial institutions. These balances in the U.S. may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance limits. While we monitor the cash balances in our operating accounts and adjust the cash balances as appropriate, these cash balances could be impacted if the underlying financial institutions fail.

As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, we had a combined balance of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and restricted cash of ~~$740.2~~$638.8 million, a decrease of ~~$12.5~~$113.9 million from June 30, 2012. Cash and cash equivalents decreased by ~~$95.6~~$143.4 million in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, primarily due to ~~$85.4~~$125.3 million used for financing activities, $83.2 million used for the acquisitions of business, $46.7 million used for the purchase of property, plant and equipment and net cash outflows of ~~$83.6~~$32.9 million used for the purchase of available-for-sale investments, ~~and $33.3 million used for the purchases of property, plant and equipment,~~ offset by cash generated by operating activities of ~~$102.5~~$130.7 million and net proceeds from the sale of the Hologram Business of $11.2 million.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, cash provided by operating activities was ~~$102.5~~$130.7 million, resulting from our net income adjusted for non-cash items such as depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation of ~~$101.8~~$131.1 million and changes in operating assets and liabilities that ~~generated $0.7 million~~used $0.4 million. Changes in operating assets and liabilities related primarily to a decrease in ~~accounts receivable~~accrued payroll and related expenses of ~~$29.4~~$24.3 million ~~driven by our collection efforts~~due to timing of bonus and ~~an increase in accounts payable of $3.6 million, offset by an increase in other current~~salary payments and ~~non-current assets of $13.8 million, a decrease in deferred revenue of $12.5 million~~lower bonus accrual and a decrease in accrued expenses and other current and non-current liabilities of ~~$5.0 million.~~$15.1 million, offset by a decrease in inventory of $19.8 million and an decrease in accounts receivable of $17.2 million driven by our collection efforts.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2011,~~2012, cash provided by operating activities was ~~$68.6~~$81.8 million, resulting from our net income adjusted for non-cash items such as depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation of ~~$98.8~~$141.6 million, and changes in operating assets and liabilities that used ~~$30.2~~$59.8 million related primarily to ~~a decrease in accounts payable of $21.8 million, an increase in inventories of $19.6 million,~~ a decrease in accrued payroll and related expenses of ~~$13.0~~$36.9 million which was primarily due to timing of bonus and salary payments and lower bonus and commission accruals, an increase in inventories of $22.9 million primarily as part of a supply-chain strategy to enhance lead time for customer shipments, a decrease in ~~deferred revenue~~accounts payable of ~~$9.6~~$19.0 million and an increase in other current and non-current assets of ~~$6.7~~$6.5 million, offset by a decrease in accounts receivable of ~~$38.8~~$28.6 million primarily ~~driven by seasonality of our collection activities.~~due to a decrease in net revenue.

39

~~Table of Contents~~
During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29, 2012~~ March 30, 2013, cash used for investing activities was ~~$115.8~~$150.5 million, primarily related to ~~net~~ cash ~~outflows~~ used for the ~~purchase~~acquisitions of ~~available-for-sale investments~~GenComm and Arieso of ~~$83.6~~$83.2 million, cash used for the purchase of property, plant and equipment of ~~$33.3~~$46.7 million and net cash outflows used for the ~~acquisition~~purchase of ~~business~~available-for-sale investments of ~~$11.1~~$32.9 million, offset by net proceeds from sale of the Hologram Business of $11.2 million. Since we continue to invest in new technology, laboratory equipment, and manufacturing capacity to support revenue growth opportunities, investments were made during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December 29,~~March 30, 2013 to increase manufacturing capacity in Asia and the U.S., to set up and improve facilities, and to upgrade information technology systems.
During the nine months ended March 31, 2012, cash used for investing activities was $73.4 million, primarily related to cash used for the purchase of property, plant and equipment of $56.9 million, cash used for the acquisitions of QuantaSol and Dyaptive of $12.5 million, and net cash outflows used for the purchase of available-for-sale investments of $8.2 million, offset by proceeds from the sale of assets of $2.1 million primarily from the Eningen transaction. Since we continue to invest in new technology, laboratory equipment,
41

Table of Contents
and manufacturing capacity to support revenue growth opportunities across all three segments, investments were made during the nine months ended March 31, 2012 to increase manufacturing capacity in Asia and the U.S., to set up and improve facilities, and to upgrade information technology systems.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended December 31, 2011 cash used for investing activities was $50.3 million, primarily related to cash used for the purchase of property, plant and equipment of $40.8 million, net cash outflows used for the purchase of available-for-sale investments of $9.7 million, and cash used for the acquisition of QuantaSol of $3.7 million, offset by proceeds from the sale of assets of $2.1 million primarily from the Eningen transaction.
~~During the six months ended December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, cash used for financing activities was ~~$85.4~~$125.3 million, primarily related to the repurchase of our 1% Senior Convertible Notes in the amount of ~~$96.5~~$145.8 million, offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options and the issuance of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan of ~~$11.5~~$21.3 million.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~December~~March 31, ~~2011,~~2012, cash provided by financing activities was ~~$6.3~~$13.1 million, related to proceeds from the exercise of stock options and the issuance of common stock under our employee stock purchase plan of ~~$7.0~~$17.5 million and proceeds from financing obligation of $6.9 million related to the Eningen transaction, offset by payments made on financing obligations and issuance cost for revolving credit facility of ~~$7.6 million.~~$9.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively.

We believe that our existing cash balances, investments and availability under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to meet our liquidity and capital spending requirements, including the repayment of the principal balance of ~~$211.0~~$161.0 million outstanding under the 1% Senior Convertible Notes, which is expected to be paid no later than ~~May~~the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013 based on the put and call provisions of the 1% Senior Convertible Notes. However, there are a number of factors that could positively or negatively impact our liquidity position, including:

·                  global economic conditions which affect demand for our products and services and impact the financial stability of our suppliers and customers;
·                  changes in accounts receivable, inventory or other operating assets and liabilities which affect our working capital;
·                  increase in capital expenditure to support the revenue growth opportunity of our business;
·                  the tendency of customers to delay payments or to negotiate favorable payment term to manage their own liquidity positions;
·                  timing of payments to our suppliers;
·                  factoring or sale of accounts receivable;
·                  volatility in fixed income, credit, and foreign exchange markets which impact the liquidity and valuation of our investment portfolios;
·                  possible investments or acquisitions of complementary businesses, products or technologies;
·                  issuance or repurchase of debt or equity securities;
·                  potential funding of pension liabilities either voluntarily or as required by law or regulation, and
·                  compliance with covenants and other terms and conditions related to our financing arrangements.

Contractual Obligations

During the ~~second~~third quarter of fiscal 2013, there were no material changes to the contractual obligations previously disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K for dated December 14, 2012, except for those occurring in the ordinary course of our business.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, other than the guarantees discussed in “Note 16. Commitments and Contingencies.”

Employee Stock-based Benefit Plans

Our stock-based benefit plans are a broad-based, long-term retention program that is intended to attract and retain employees and align stockholder and employee interests. See “Note 13. Stock-Based Compensation” for more detail.

40

~~Table of Contents~~
Pension and Other Post-retirement Benefits

We sponsor pension plans for certain past and present employees in the U.K. and Germany. On November 30, 2012, we terminated the defined benefit pension plan in South Korea. ~~JDSU~~We are also is responsible for the non-pension post-retirement benefit obligation of a previously acquired subsidiary. Most of these plans have been closed to new participants and no additional service costs are being accrued, except for the plans assumed in connection with ~~acquisitions~~an acquisition during fiscal ~~2010 and the first quarter of fiscal 2013.~~2010. The U.K. plan is partially funded; and the German plans, which were established as “pay-as-you-go” plans, are unfunded. The authoritative guidance requires the recognition of the funded status of the pension plans and non-pension post-retirement benefit plans (retirement-related benefit plans) as an asset or a liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The authoritative guidance also requires the recognition of changes in that funded status in the year in which they occur through the gains and (losses) not affecting retained earnings, net of tax, and the
42

Table of Contents
recognition of previously unrecognized gains/(losses), prior service costs/(credits) and transition assets as a component of Accumulated gains and (losses) not affecting retained earnings. The funded status of a retirement plan is the difference between the projected benefit obligation and the fair value of its plan assets. The projected benefit obligation is the actuarial present value of all benefits attributed by the plan’s benefit formula to employee service. At ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, our pension plans were under funded by ~~$93.3~~$89.9 million since the projected benefit obligation exceeded the fair value of its plan assets. Similarly, we had a liability of $1.1 million related to our non-pension post-retirement benefit plan. Pension plan assets are professionally managed and we monitor the performance of our investment managers. As of ~~December 29, 2012,~~March 30, 2013, the value of plan assets had increased approximately ~~6.2%~~14.8% since June 30, 2012, our most recent fiscal year end.

A key actuarial assumption is the discount rate. Changes in the discount rate impact the interest cost component of the net periodic benefit cost calculation and, due to the fact that the projected benefit obligation (“PBO”) is calculated on a net present value basis, changes in the discount rate will also impact the current PBO. Decreases in the discount rate will generally increase pre-tax cost, recognized expense and the PBO. Increases in the discount rate tend to have the opposite effect. We estimate a 50 basis point decrease or increase in the discount rate would cause a corresponding increase or decrease, respectively, in the PBO of approximately $7.0 million based upon June 30, 2012 data.

In estimating the expected return on plan assets, we consider historical returns on plan assets, adjusted for forward-looking considerations, inflation assumptions and the impact of active management of the plan’s invested assets. While it is not possible to accurately predict future rate movements, we believe our current assumptions are appropriate. Please refer to “Note 14. Employee Defined Benefit Plans” for further discussion.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risks

We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Derivatives and other financial instruments are used to mitigate exposures subject to market risk. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Foreign Exchange Risk

We utilize foreign exchange forward contracts and other instruments, including option contracts, to hedge foreign currency risk associated with foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, primarily certain short-term intercompany receivables and payables. Our foreign exchange forward contracts and other instruments are accounted for as derivatives whereby the fair value of the contracts are reflected as other current assets or other current liabilities and the associated gains and losses are reflected in Interest and other income ~~(loss)~~(expense), net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Our hedging programs reduce, but do not eliminate, the impact of currency exchange rate movements. The gains and losses on those derivatives are expected to be offset by re-measurement gains and losses on the foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities.

Forward contracts, most with a term of less than 120 days, were transacted near month end and therefore, the fair value of the contracts as of March 30, 2013 is approximately zero. The change in the fair value of these foreign currency forward contracts is recorded as income or loss in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations as a component of Interest and other income (expense), net.

4143

Table of Contents

The following table provides information about our foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of ~~December 29, 2012.~~March 30, 2013.

Contract

Contract

Contract

Contract

Amount

Amount

Amount

Amount

(in millions)

(Local Currency)

(USD)

(Local Currency)

(USD)

Canadian Dollar (contracts to buy CAD / sell USD)

CAD
47.5

$
47.7

CAD
37.2

$
36.5

Chinese Renminbi (contracts to buy CNY / sell USD)

CNY
238.7

37.9

CNY
242.3

38.6

British Pound (contracts to buy GBP / sell USD)

GBP
0.5

0.8

British Pound (contracts to sell GBP / buy USD)

GBP
6.6

10.0

Euro (contracts to buy EUR / sell USD)

EUR
3.8

5.0

EUR
29.3

37.7

Hong Kong Dollar (contracts to buy HKD / sell USD)

HKD
19.5

2.5

Singapore Dollar (contracts to sell SGD / buy USD)

SGD
32.3

26.4

SGD
44.7

36.0

Mexican Peso (contracts to buy MXN / sell USD)

MXN
96.2

7.3

MXN
96.2

7.7

Australian Dollar (contracts to sell AUD / buy USD)

AUD
9.7

9.9

AUD
2.8

2.9

Brazilian Real (contracts to sell BRL / buy USD)

BRL
2.2

1.1

BRL
10.5

5.2

Japanese Yen (contracts to sell JPY / buy USD)

JPY
141.7

1.7

Japanese Yen (contracts to buy JPY / sell USD)

JPY
131.1

1.4

Indian Rupee (contracts to sell INR / buy USD)

INR
303.2

5.5

Total USD notional amount of outstanding foreign exchange contracts

$
137.8

$
184.0

The counterparties to these hedging transactions are creditworthy multinational financial institutions. We actively manage these counterparty exposures by seeking to diversify our hedge positions across multiple counterparties to avoid concentration of risk and by minimizing exposures to less creditworthy counterparties. Nevertheless, under current market conditions, failure of one or more of these financial institutions could result in incurred losses.

Notwithstanding our efforts to mitigate some foreign exchange risks, we do not hedge all of our foreign currency exposures, and there can be no assurances that our mitigating activities related to the exposures that we do hedge will adequately protect us against the risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations.

Investments

We maintain an investment portfolio in a variety of financial instruments, including, but not limited to, U.S. government and agency bonds, corporate obligations, money market funds, asset-backed securities, and other investment-grade securities. The majority of these investments pay a fixed rate of interest. The securities in the investment portfolio are subject to market price risk due to changes in interest rates, perceived issuer creditworthiness, marketability, and other factors. These investments are generally classified as available-for-sale and, consequently, are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of Stockholders’ equity. We did not hold any investments in auction rate securities, mortgage backed securities, collateralized demand obligations, or variable rate demand notes at ~~December 29, 2012.~~March 30, 2013.

Investments in both fixed-rate and floating-rate interest earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. The fair market values of our fixed-rate securities decline if interest rates rise, while floating-rate securities may produce less income than expected if interest rates fall. Due in part to these factors, our future investment income may be less than expectations because of changes in interest rates or we may suffer losses in principal if forced to sell securities that have experienced a decline in market value because of changes in interest rates.

Debt

The fair market value of the 1% Senior Convertible Notes is subject to interest rate and market price risk due to the convertible feature of the notes and other factors. Generally, the fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. The fair market value of the notes may also increase as the market price of JDSU stock rises and decrease as the market price of the stock falls. Interest rate and market value changes affect the fair market value of the notes but do not impact our financial position, cash flows or results of operations. Based on quoted market prices, as of ~~December 29, 2012~~March 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012, the fair market value of the 1% Senior Convertible Notes was ~~$210.5~~$161.0 million and $307.3 million, respectively. For additional information, see “Note 10. Debt and Letters of Credit.”

4244

Table of Contents
Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures: The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: There have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is subject to a variety of claims and suits that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. While Management currently believes that resolving claims against the Company, individually or in aggregate, will not have a material adverse impact on its financial position, results of operations or statement of cash flows, these matters are subject to inherent uncertainties and Management’s view of these matters may change in the future. Were an unfavorable final outcome to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows for the period in which the effect becomes reasonably estimable.
Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 14, 2012.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the ~~second~~third quarter of fiscal 2013, the Company repurchased ~~$50~~$50.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 1% Senior Convertible Notes for ~~$49.9~~$50.0 million in cash.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

4345

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

The following documents are filed as Exhibits to this report:

~~Incorporated by Reference~~
~~Filed~~
~~Exhibit No.~~
~~Exhibit Description~~
~~Form~~
~~Exhibit~~
~~Filing Date~~
~~Herewith~~
~~3.1~~
~~Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation~~
X
~~10.10~~
~~Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan~~
X
~~31.1~~
~~Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~
X
~~31.2~~
~~Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~
X
~~32.1~~
~~Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~
X
~~32.2~~
~~Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~
X
~~101.INS~~
~~XBRL Instance~~
X
~~101.SCH~~
~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema~~
X
~~101.CAL~~
~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation~~
X
~~101.DEF~~
~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document~~
X
~~101.LAB~~
~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation~~
X
~~101.PRE~~
~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation~~
X

Incorporated by Reference

Filed
Exhibit No.

Exhibit Description

Form

Exhibit

Filing Date

Herewith
10.1

Amendment to Employment Agreement for Thomas Waechter

8-K

10.1

3/22/13

10.2

2008 Change of Control Benefits Plan, as amended

8-K

10.2

3/22/13

31.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

X
31.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

X
32.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

X
32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

X
101.INS

XBRL Instance

X
101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

X
101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

X
101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

X
101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation

X
101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation

X

4446

Table of Contents
SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

JDS Uniphase Corporation

(Registrant)

/s/ REX S. JACKSON

By: Rex S. Jackson

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)

Date: ~~February 6,~~May 8, 2013

4547

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	December 29, 2012		December 31, 2011			December 29, 2012			December 31, 2011
Numerator:
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax	$	3.3	$	(7.7	)	$	(6.5	)	$	(11.3	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	0.8		(2.5		)	(1.0		)	(4.7		)
Net income (loss)	$	4.1	$	(10.2	)	$	(7.5	)	$	(16.0	)

Denominator:
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
Basic	234.4		229.4			233.6			228.9
Effect of dilutive securities from stock-based benefit plans	2.7		—			—			—
Diluted	237.1		229.4			233.6			228.9

Basic net income (loss) per share from:
Continuing operations, net of tax	$	0.02	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.05	)
Discontinued operations, net of tax	—		(0.01		)	—			(0.02		)
Net income (loss)	$	0.02	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.07	)

Diluted net income (loss) per share from:
Continuing operations, net of tax	$	0.02	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.05	)
Discontinued operations, net of tax	—		(0.01		)	—			(0.02		)
Net income (loss)	$	0.02	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.07	)

	December 29, 2012			June 30, 2012
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale investments, net of tax	$	(2.6	)	$	(2.8	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments	17.0			10.6
Defined benefit obligation, net of tax	(0.3		)	(0.3		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	$	14.1		$	7.5

	Unrealized gains
	(losses) on			Foreign currency		Defined benefit
	available-for-			translation		obligation, net
	sale investments			adjustments		of tax (1)			Total
Beginning balance as of June 30, 2012	$	(2.8	)	$	10.6	$	(0.3	)	$	7.5
Other comprehensive income before reclassification	0.4			3.2		—			3.6
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (2)	(0.4		)	—		—			(0.4		)
Net current-period other comprehensive income	—			3.2		—			3.2
Ending balance as of March 30, 2013	$	(2.8	)	$	13.8	$	(0.3	)	$	10.7

Net tangible assets acquired	$	0.5
Intangible assets acquired:
Developed technology	32.8
Customer relationships	14.5
Order backlog	1.4
Goodwill	40.4
Total purchase price	$	89.6

Cash	$	4.1
Accounts receivable	8.4
Property and equipment	0.6
Accounts payable	(0.3		)
Accrued expenses, net of other assets	(1.4		)
Employee related liabilities	(1.4		)
Deferred revenue	(1.7		)
Deferred tax liabilities, net	(7.8		)
Net tangible assets acquired	$	0.5

										June 30,		Charged to Costs					March 30,
	June 30, 2012		Charged to Costs and Expenses		Deduction (1)			December 29, 2012		2012		and Expenses		Deduction (1)			2013
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	2.2	$	0.4	$	(0.6	)	$	2.0	$	2.2	$	0.5	$	(0.6	)	$	2.1
Allowance for sales returns	0.4		—		(0.3		)	0.1		0.4		—		(0.3		)	0.1
Total accounts receivable reserves	$	2.6	$	0.4	$	(0.9	)	$	2.1	$	2.6	$	0.5	$	(0.9	)	$	2.2

	Amortized		Gross		Gross
	Cost / Carrying		Unrealized		Unrealized			Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Debt securities:
U.S. treasuries	$	71.9	$	—	$	—		$	71.9
Agencies
U.S.	53.4		0.1		—			53.5
Foreign	4.0		0.1		—			4.1
Municipal bonds and sovereign debt instruments	6.6		—		—			6.6
Asset-backed securities	40.2		0.3		(0.4		)	40.1
Corporate securities
U.S.	213.8		1.4		(0.1		)	215.1
Foreign	33.4		2.2		—			35.6
Total available-for-sale securities	$	423.3	$	4.1	$	(0.5	)	$	426.9

	Less than 12 Months		Greater than 12 Months		Total		Less than 12 Months		Greater than 12 Months		Total
Municipal bonds and sovereign debt instruments							$	0.1	$	—	$	0.1
Asset-backed securities	$	—	$	0.4	$	0.4	—		0.3		0.3
Corporate securities	0.1		—		0.1		0.3		0.2		0.5
Total gross unrealized losses	$	0.1	$	0.4	$	0.5	$	0.4	$	0.5	$	0.9

	Less than		Greater than
	12 Months		12 Months		Total
Asset-backed securities	$	—	$	0.4	$	0.4
Corporate securities	0.1		—		0.1
Total gross unrealized losses	$	0.1	$	0.4	$	0.5

									Fair value measurement as of March 30, 2013
									Quoted Prices in		Significant
									Active Markets		Other
									for Identical		Observable
			Fair value measurement as of December 29, 2012						Assets		Inputs
	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Total		(Level 1)		(Level 2)
Assets:
Debt available-for-sale securities
U.S. treasuries	$	71.9	$	71.9	$	—	$	30.6	$	30.6	$	—
Agencies
U.S.	53.5		—		53.5
Foreign	4.1		—		4.1
U.S. agencies							53.5		—		53.5
Municipal bonds and sovereign debt instruments	6.6		—		6.6		10.2		—		10.2
Asset-backed securities	40.1		—		40.1		38.7		—		38.7
Corporate securities							235.3				235.3
U.S.	215.1				215.1
Foreign	35.6				35.6
Total debt available-for-sale securities	426.9		71.9		355.0		368.3		30.6		337.7
Money market funds	220.9		220.9		—		173.9		173.9		—
Trading securities	4.9		4.9		—		4.2		4.2		—
Total assets (1)	$	652.7	$	297.7	$	355.0	$	546.4	$	208.7	$	337.7

	Communication Test		Optical Security and
	Test and Measurement		Performance Products (1)		Total
Balance as of June 30, 2012	$	60.4	$	8.3	$	68.7
Goodwill from GenComm acquisition (2)	5.7		—		5.7
Goodwill from Arieso acquisition (2)	40.4		—		40.4
Balance as of March 30, 2013	$	106.5	$	8.3	$	114.8

	Gross							Gross
	Carrying		Accumulated					Carrying		Accumulated
As of December 29, 2012	Amount		Amortization			Net
As of March 30, 2013								Amount		Amortization			Net
Acquired developed technology	$	543.5	$	(434.9	)	$	108.6	$	573.3	$	(449.3	)	$	124.0
Other	230.1		(198.8		)	31.3		245.0		(201.0		)	44.0
Total intangibles	$	773.6	$	(633.7	)	$	139.9	$	818.3	$	(650.3	)	$	168.0

Fiscal Years
Remainder of 2013	$	33.3	$	18.4
2014	41.8		50.5
2015	33.9		43.1
2016	12.9		22.3
2017	9.6		19.0
Thereafter	8.4		14.7
Total amortization	$	139.9	$	168.0

			Six Months Ended					Non-cash				Three Months Ended
	Balance		December 29,					Settlements		Balance		December 29,
	June 30,		2012		Cash			and Other		December 29,		2012
	2012		Charges		Settlements			Adjustments		2012		Charges
CommTest Wireless Business Restructuring Plan	$	—	$	1.8	$	(1.0	)	$	—	$	0.8	$	1.8
CCOP CPV Plan	—		0.6		(0.4		)	—		0.2		—
CommTest Operation and Repair Outsourcing Restructuring Plan
Workforce Reduction	$	3.9	$	1.5	$	(3.8	)	$	—	$	1.6	$	0.6
Facilities and Equipment	—		0.7		(0.7		)	—		—		0.2
Lease Costs	—		0.5		(0.3		)	—		0.2		—
Total CommTest Operation and Repair Outsourcing Restructuring Plan	$	3.9	$	2.7	$	(4.8	)	$	—	$	1.8	$	0.8
OSP Business Consolidation Plan	0.8		—		(0.6		)	—		0.2		—
CommTest Manufacturing Support Consolidation Plan (Workforce Reduction)	2.5		0.5		(2.0		)	—		1.0		0.4
CommTest Germantown Tower Restructuring Plan (Lease Costs)	0.5		—		—			—		0.5		—
CommTest Market Rebalancing Restructuring Plan (Lease Costs)	0.9		—		(0.2		)	—		0.7		—
CommTest US Manufacturing Outsourcing Restructuring Plan (Lease Costs)	1.1		—		(0.2		)	—		0.9		—
CommTest Germany Restructuring Plan (Workforce Reduction)	2.4		0.1		(0.3		)	0.2		2.4		—
Other plans
Workforce Reduction	$	0.4	$	—	$	(0.3	)	$	—	$	0.1	$	—
Lease Costs	0.1		—		—			0.4		0.5		—
Total other plans	$	0.5	$	—	$	(0.3	)	$	0.4	$	0.6	$	—
Total	$	12.6	$	5.7	$	(9.8	)	$	0.6	$	9.1	$	3.0

Ottawa Lease Exit Costs	$	4.6	$	0.2	$	(0.6	)	$	0.1	$	4.3	$	0.1

			Nine									Three
			Months									Months
			Ended					Non-cash				Ended
	Balance		March 30,					Settlements		Balance		March 30,
	June 30,		2013		Cash			and Other		March 30,		2013
	2012		Charges		Settlements			Adjustments		2013		Charges
Fiscal 2013 Plans
CCOP Outsourcing Plan (Workforce reduction)	$	—	$	0.9	$	(0.2	)	$	—	$	0.7	$	0.9
CommTest Wireless Business Restructuring Plan (Workforce reduction)	—		1.8		(1.7		)	—		0.1		—
CCOP CPV Plan (Workforce reduction)	—		0.5		(0.4		)	—		0.1		(0.1		)
Fiscal 2012 Plans
CommTest Operation and Repair Outsourcing Restructuring Plan:
Workforce reduction	$	3.9	$	1.3	$	(4.6	)	$	—	$	0.6	$	(0.2	)
Facilities and equipment	—		0.8		(0.8		)	—		—		0.1
Lease costs	—		0.5		(0.4		)	0.4		0.5		—
Total CommTest Operation and Repair Outsourcing Restructuring Plan	$	3.9	$	2.6	$	(5.8	)	$	0.4	$	1.1	$	(0.1	)
OSP Business Consolidation Plan (Workforce reduction)	0.8		—		(0.8		)	—		—		—
CommTest Manufacturing Support Consolidation Plan (Workforce reduction)	2.5		0.2		(2.3		)	—		0.4		(0.3		)
CommTest Germantown Restructuring Plan (Lease costs)	0.5		—		—			—		0.5		—
Other plans	0.2		—		(0.2		)	—		—		—
Fiscal 2011 Plans
CommTest Market Rebalancing Restructuring Plan:
Workforce reduction	$	0.1	$	—	$	(0.1	)	$	—	$	—	$	—
Lease costs	1.0		—		(0.3		)	—		0.7		—
Total CommTest Market Rebalancing Restructuring Plan	$	1.1	$	—	$	(0.4	)	$	—	$	0.7	$	—
Plans Prior to Fiscal 2011	$	3.6	$	0.1	$	(1.3	)	$	0.1	$	2.5	$	—
Total	$	12.6	$	6.1	$	(13.1	)	$	0.5	$	6.1	$	0.4

Ottawa Lease Exit Costs	$	4.6	$	0.3	$	(0.9	)	$	—	$	4.0	$	0.1

Fiscal Years
Remainder of 2012	$	3.8
2013	5.6
Remainder of 2013			$	2.8
2014	3.7		5.6
2015	3.5		3.7
2016	3.5		3.4
2017			3.5
Thereafter	37.3		37.2
Total	$	57.4	$	56.2

Gross Proceeds	$	11.5
Less: carrying value of net assets	(10.6		)
Less: selling costs	(0.3		)
Gain	$	0.6

	October 12,
	2012
Accounts receivable, net	$	2.7
Inventories, net	4.4
Property, plant and equipment, net	0.8
Intangibles, net	5.8
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	(1.5		)
Other current and non-current liabilities	(1.6		)
Total net assets held for sale	$	10.6

	Contract		Contract		Contract		Contract
	Amount		Amount		Amount		Amount
(in millions)	(Local Currency)		(USD)		(Local Currency)		(USD)

Canadian Dollar (contracts to buy CAD / sell USD)	CAD	47.5	$	47.7	CAD	37.2	$	36.5
Chinese Renminbi (contracts to buy CNY / sell USD)	CNY	238.7	37.9		CNY	242.3	38.6
British Pound (contracts to buy GBP / sell USD)	GBP	0.5	0.8
British Pound (contracts to sell GBP / buy USD)					GBP	6.6	10.0
Euro (contracts to buy EUR / sell USD)	EUR	3.8	5.0		EUR	29.3	37.7
Hong Kong Dollar (contracts to buy HKD / sell USD)					HKD	19.5	2.5
Singapore Dollar (contracts to sell SGD / buy USD)	SGD	32.3	26.4		SGD	44.7	36.0
Mexican Peso (contracts to buy MXN / sell USD)	MXN	96.2	7.3		MXN	96.2	7.7
Australian Dollar (contracts to sell AUD / buy USD)	AUD	9.7	9.9		AUD	2.8	2.9
Brazilian Real (contracts to sell BRL / buy USD)	BRL	2.2	1.1		BRL	10.5	5.2
Japanese Yen (contracts to sell JPY / buy USD)	JPY	141.7	1.7
Japanese Yen (contracts to buy JPY / sell USD)					JPY	131.1	1.4
Indian Rupee (contracts to sell INR / buy USD)					INR	303.2	5.5

Total USD notional amount of outstanding foreign exchange contracts			$	137.8			$	184.0

		~~Incorporated by Reference~~			~~Filed~~
~~Exhibit No.~~	~~Exhibit Description~~	~~Form~~	~~Exhibit~~	~~Filing Date~~	~~Herewith~~
~~3.1~~	~~Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation~~				X
~~10.10~~	~~Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan~~				X
~~31.1~~	~~Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~				X
~~31.2~~	~~Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~				X
~~32.1~~	~~Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~				X
~~32.2~~	~~Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~				X
~~101.INS~~	~~XBRL Instance~~				X
~~101.SCH~~	~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema~~				X
~~101.CAL~~	~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation~~				X
~~101.DEF~~	~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document~~				X
~~101.LAB~~	~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation~~				X
~~101.PRE~~	~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation~~				X

		Incorporated by Reference			Filed
Exhibit No.	Exhibit Description	Form	Exhibit	Filing Date	Herewith
10.1	Amendment to Employment Agreement for Thomas Waechter	8-K	10.1	3/22/13
10.2	2008 Change of Control Benefits Plan, as amended	8-K	10.2	3/22/13
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.				X
31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.				X
32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.				X
32.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.				X
101.INS	XBRL Instance				X
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema				X
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation				X
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document				X
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation				X
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation				X


	JDS Uniphase Corporation
	(Registrant)


	/s/ REX S. JACKSON
	By: Rex S. Jackson
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)