TWILIO INC.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
	PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)	4

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016~~2017	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~ June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017	5

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Three and ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~ June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017	6

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, 2018 and 2017 ~~and~~ ~~2016~~	7

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2427

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3541

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3641

	PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3742

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3843

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	6470

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	70

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	70

Item 5.	Other Information	70

Item 6.	Exhibits	6571

	Signatures	6772

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which statements involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements generally relate to future events or our future financial or operating performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements because they contain words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these words or other similar terms or expressions that concern our expectations, strategy, plans or intentions. Forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include, but are not limited to, statements about:

· our future financial performance, including our revenue, cost of revenue, gross margin and operating expenses, ability to generate positive cash flow and ability to achieve and sustain profitability;

· the impact and expected results from changes in our relationship with our larger customers;

· the sufficiency of our cash and cash equivalents to meet our liquidity needs;

· anticipated technology trends, such as the use of and demand for cloud communications;

· our ability to continue to build and maintain credibility with the global software developer community;

· our ability to attract and retain customers to use our products;

· our ability to attract and retain enterprises and international organizations as customers for our products;

· our ability to form and expand partnerships with independent software vendors and system integrators;

· the evolution of technology affecting our products and markets;

· our ability to introduce new products and enhance existing products;

· our ability to optimize our network service provider coverage and connectivity;

· our ability to pass on our savings associated with our platform optimization efforts to our customers;

· our ability to successfully enter into new markets and manage our international expansion;

· the attraction and retention of qualified employees and key personnel;

· our ability to effectively manage our growth and future expenses and maintain our corporate culture;

· our anticipated investments in sales and marketing and research and development;

· our ability to maintain, protect and enhance our intellectual property;

· our ability to successfully defend litigation brought against us;

· our ability to service the interest on our convertible notes and repay such notes, to the extent required; and

· our ability to comply with modified or new laws and regulations applying to our ~~business;~~business, including GDPR, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 and other privacy regulations that may be implemented in the future.

· ~~the increased expenses associated with being a public company.~~

We caution you that the foregoing list may not contain all of the forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

You should not rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We have based the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q primarily on our current expectations and projections about future events and trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. The outcome of the events described in these forward-looking statements is subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors described in ~~the section titled~~Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all risks and uncertainties that could have an impact on the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We cannot assure you that the results, events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur, and actual results, events or circumstances could differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements.

The forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or to reflect new information or the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law. We may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations disclosed in our forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions, joint ventures or investments we may make.

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

TWILIO INC.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

							As of June 30,			As of December 31,
	As of September 30, 2017			As of December 31, 2016			2018			2017
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	91,906		$	305,665		$	493,510		$	115,286
Short-term marketable securities	192,031			—			301,136			175,587
Accounts receivable, net	37,258			26,203			67,572			43,113
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	26,420			21,512			21,812			19,279
Total current assets	347,615			353,380			884,030			353,265
Restricted cash	7,450			7,445			5,505			5,502
Property and equipment, net	47,718			37,552			56,721			50,541
Intangible assets, net	21,274			10,268			17,108			20,064
Goodwill	17,407			3,565			17,506			17,851
Other long-term assets	2,084			484			4,978			2,559
Total assets	$	443,548		$	412,694		$	985,848		$	449,782
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	7,117		$	4,174		$	23,765		$	11,116
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	55,283			59,308			82,171			53,614
Customer deposits							7,843			—
Deferred revenue	13,599			10,222			9,056			13,797
Total current liabilities	75,999			73,704			122,835			78,527
Long-term liabilities	12,549			9,543
Convertible senior notes, net							423,099			—
Other long-term liabilities							10,243			11,409
Total liabilities	88,548			83,247			556,177			89,936
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock							—			—
Class A and Class B common stock	93			87			96			94
Additional paid-in capital	584,390			516,090			725,073			608,165
Accumulated other comprehensive income							1,962			2,025
Accumulated deficit	(231,519		)	(186,730		)	(297,460		)	(250,438		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	2,036			—
Total stockholders’ equity	355,000			329,447			429,671			359,846
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	443,548		$	412,694		$	985,848		$	449,782

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

TWILIO INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Revenue	$	100,542		$	71,533		$	283,784		$	195,383		$	147,754		$	95,870		$	276,870		$	183,242
Cost of revenue	48,254			31,285			127,873			86,315			67,940			42,333			127,522			79,619
Gross profit	52,288			40,248			155,911			109,068			79,814			53,537			149,348			103,623
Operating expenses:
Research and development	31,674			21,106			87,910			53,339			39,811			29,714			77,387			56,236
Sales and marketing	25,778			15,873			73,047			47,451			37,749			26,153			70,571			47,269
General and administrative	18,867			14,545			40,810			36,773			24,212			4,740			47,605			21,943
Total operating expenses	76,319			51,524			201,767			137,563			101,772			60,607			195,563			125,448
Loss from operations	(24,031		)	(11,276		)	(45,856		)	(28,495		)	(21,958		)	(7,070		)	(46,215		)	(21,825		)
Other income, net	1,000			138			1,969			92
Other income (expenses), net													(1,898		)	471			(1,233		)	969
Loss before provision for income taxes	(23,031		)	(11,138		)	(43,887		)	(28,403		)	(23,856		)	(6,599		)	(47,448		)	(20,856		)
Provision for income taxes	(422		)	(116		)	(902		)	(313		)	(150		)	(510		)	(287		)	(480		)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(23,453	)	$	(11,254	)	(44,789		)	$	(28,716	)	$	(24,006	)	$	(7,109	)	$	(47,735	)	$	(21,336	)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.49	)	$	(0.68	)	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.50	)	$	(0.24	)
Weighted-average shares used in computing net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted	92,156,768			83,887,901			90,543,087			42,030,989			96,348,356			90,873,305			95,515,583			89,722,874

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

TWILIO INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Net loss	$	(23,453	)	$	(11,254	)	$	(44,789	)	$	(28,716	)	$	(24,006	)	$	(7,109	)	$	(47,735	)	$	(21,336	)
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized loss on marketable securities	(44		)	—			(238		)	—
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities													152			(106		)	(165		)	(194		)
Foreign currency translation	793			—			2,274			—			(629		)	1,583			102			1,481
Total other comprehensive income	749			—			2,036			—
Total other comprehensive income (loss)													(477		)	1,477			(63		)	1,287
Comprehensive loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(22,704	)	$	(11,254	)	$	(42,753	)	$	(28,716	)	$	(24,483	)	$	(5,632	)	$	(47,798	)	$	(20,049	)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

TWILIO INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

							Six Months Ended June 30,
	Nine Months Ended September 30,						2018			2017
	2017			2016						As Adjusted
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(44,789	)	$	(28,716	)	$	(47,735	)	$	(21,336	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	13,406			5,292			11,392			8,480
Amortization of bond premium	153			—
Net amortization of investment premium and discount							(237		)	107
Amortization of debt issuance costs							211			—
Accretion of debt discount on convertible senior notes							2,484			—
Stock-based compensation	35,973			15,649			38,546			21,785
Amortization of deferred commissions							478			140
Provision for doubtful accounts	407			1,017			1,515			282
Write-off of internal-use software							515			96
Gain on lease termination	(295		)	—			—			(295		)
Write-off of internally developed software	96			188
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(9,173		)	(11,275		)	(26,048		)	(9,365		)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	(4,947		)	(11,561		)	(2,847		)	1,933
Other long-term assets	(1,512		)	(59		)	(1,908		)	(932		)
Accounts payable	1,411			2,317			12,566			(1,282		)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities	(1,454		)	18,625			28,040			(6,311		)
Customer deposits							7,842			—
Deferred revenue	3,364			3,346			(4,542		)	2,353
Long-term liabilities	306			9,596			(1,047		)	296
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	(7,054		)	4,419			19,225			(4,049		)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash	1,170			(7,439		)
Purchases of marketable securities	(280,569		)	—			(184,364		)	(220,914		)
Maturities of marketable securities	87,325			—			58,520			23,000
Capitalized software development costs	(12,281		)	(8,447		)	(9,958		)	(8,000		)
Purchases of property and equipment	(8,613		)	(5,282		)	(2,066		)	(6,772		)
Purchases of intangible assets	(206		)	(646		)	(249		)	(154		)
Acquisition, net of cash acquired	(22,621		)	—			—			(22,621		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(235,795		)	(21,814		)	(138,117		)	(235,461		)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from initial public offering, net of underwriting discounts	—			160,426
Proceeds from issuance of convertible senior notes							550,000			—
Payment of debt issuance costs							(12,513		)	—
Purchase of capped call							(58,465		)	—
Payments of costs related to public offerings	(430		)	(3,936		)	—			(430		)
Proceeds from exercises of stock options	22,504			4,751			13,715			18,154
Proceeds from shares issued in ESPP	7,404			—
Tax benefit related to stock-based compensation	—			62
Proceeds from shares issued under ESPP							4,474			7,404
Value of equity awards withheld for tax liabilities	(476		)	(518		)	(910		)	(311		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	29,002			160,785			496,301			24,817
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	88			—
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS	(213,759		)	143,390
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period	305,665			108,835
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period	$	91,906		$	252,225
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash							818			42
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH							378,227			(214,651		)
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH—Beginning of period							120,788			314,280
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH —End of period							$	499,015		$	99,629
Cash paid for income taxes	$	489		$	153		$	321		$	373
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of property, equipment and intangible assets, accrued but not paid	$	124		$	2,373		$	572		$	376
Stock-based compensation capitalized in software development costs	$	2,712		$	1,068		$	2,909		$	1,557
Vesting of early exercised options	$	315		$	512
Costs related to the public offerings, accrued but not paid	$	—		$	368
Debt offering costs, accrued but not paid							$	467		$	—

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

TWILIO INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Organization and Description of Business

Twilio Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on March 13, 2008. The Company is the leader in the Cloud Communications Platform category and enables developers to build, scale and operate real-time communications within their software applications via simple-to-use Application Programming Interfaces ~~or APIs.~~(“API”). The power, flexibility, and reliability offered by the Company’s software building blocks empower entities of virtually every shape and size to build world-class engagement into their customer experience.

The Company’s headquarters are located in San Francisco, California, and the Company has subsidiaries in the United States, the United Kingdom, Estonia, Ireland, Colombia, Germany, Hong Kong, Singapore, Bermuda, Spain, Sweden and Australia.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(a) Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Therefore, these condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on ~~February 21, 2017~~March 1, 2018 (“Annual Report”).

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, included herein, was derived from the audited financial statements as of that date, but may not include all disclosures including certain notes required by U.S. GAAP on an annual reporting basis.

~~In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company adopted the guidance of Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09,~~ ~~“Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718):~~ ~~Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”~~, which simplified several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, statutory tax withholding requirements and classification in the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted all provisions on either prospective or modified retrospective basis. The impact from any of the adopted provisions was immaterial to the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Hence, prior periods were not adjusted.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations, comprehensive loss and cash flows for the interim periods, but are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be anticipated for the full year ~~2017~~2018 or any future period.

(b) Principles of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

(c) Use of Estimates

The preparation of ~~consolidated~~ financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates are used for, but not limited to, revenue allowances and returns; ~~valuation of the Company’s stock and stock-based awards;~~ recoverability of long-lived and intangible assets; capitalization and useful life of the Company’s capitalized internal-use ~~software;~~software development costs; fair value of acquired intangible assets and goodwill; accruals and contingencies. Estimates are based on historical experience and on various assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable under current circumstances. However, future events are subject to change and best estimates and judgments may require further adjustments; therefore, actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Management periodically evaluates such estimates and they are adjusted prospectively based upon such periodic evaluation.

(d) Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, restricted cash and accounts receivable. The Company maintains cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and restricted cash ~~and marketable securities~~ with financial institutions that management believes are financially sound and have minimal credit risk ~~exposure.~~exposure although the balances will exceed insured limits.

The Company sells its services to a wide variety of customers. If the financial condition or results of operations of any ~~one of the large~~significant customers deteriorate substantially, operating results could be adversely affected. To reduce credit risk, management performs ongoing credit evaluations of the financial condition of significant customers. The Company does not require collateral from its credit customers and maintains reserves for estimated credit losses on customer accounts when considered necessary. Actual credit losses may differ from the Company’s estimates. AsDuring the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, and six months ended June 30, 2018, there was no customer organization that accounted for more than 10% of ~~September~~the Company’s total revenue. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, one customer organization represented approximately 11% of the Company’s ~~gross accounts receivable. As of December 31, 2016, one customer organization represented approximately 16% of the Company’s gross accounts receivable.~~total revenue.

~~In the three~~As of June 30, 2018 and ~~nine months ended September 30,~~December 31, 2017, no ~~customers~~customer organization represented more than 10% of the Company’s total revenue. In the three months ended September 30, 2016, one customer organization represented 15% of the Company’s total revenue, and in the nine months ended September 30, 2016, two customer organizations represented 10% and 13% of the Company’s total revenue.gross accounts receivable.

(e) Significant Accounting Policies

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, which replaced the existing revenue recognition guidance, ASC 605, and outlines a single set of comprehensive principles for recognizing revenue under U.S. GAAP. Among other things, ASC 606 requires entities to assess the products or services promised in contracts with customers at contract inception to determine the appropriate unit at which to record revenue, which is referred to as a performance obligation. Revenue is recognized when control of the promised products or services is transferred to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those products or services.

The Company adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method with cumulative catch-up adjustment to the opening retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2017 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with the Company’s historical accounting policies prior to adoption. In adopting the standard, the Company elected to apply the new guidance only to those contracts which were not completed as of the date of the adoption.

The impact of adopting the new standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements was insignificant. The Company recorded a net cumulative catch-up adjustment to the beginning retained earnings as of January 1, 2018, of $0.7 million.

The primary impact relates to the deferral of incremental commission costs of obtaining new contracts. Under ASC 605, the Company deferred only direct and incremental commission costs to obtain a contract and amortized those costs on a straight-line basis over the term of the related subscription contract. Under the new standard, the Company defers all incremental commission costs to obtain the contract and amortizes these costs on a straight-line basis over the expected term of benefit of the underlying asset, which was determined to be five years.

The impact on the Company’s revenue recognition policies was insignificant. Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, the Company recognized the majority of its revenue according to the usage by its customers in the period in which that usage occurred. ASC 606 continues to support the recognition of revenue over time, and on a usage basis, for the majority of the Company’s contracts due to continuous transfer of control to the customer. The impact on the Company’s balance sheet presentation includes presenting customer refundable prepayments as customer deposit liabilities, whereas under ASC 605 these were included in deferred revenues.

There was not a significant tax impact to the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and consolidated balance sheet relating to the adoption of the new standard as there is a full valuation allowance due to the Company’s history of continued losses.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized upon transfer of control of promised products or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to receive in exchange for those products or services. The Company enters into contracts that can include various combinations of products and services, which are generally capable of being distinct and accounted for as separate performance obligations. Revenue is recognized net of allowances for credits and any taxes collected from customers, which are subsequently remitted to governmental authorities.

The Company determines revenue recognition through the following steps:

· Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer;

· Identification of the performance obligations in the contract;

· Determination of the transaction price;

· Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and

· Recognition of revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies a performance obligation.

Nature of Products and Services

The Company’s revenue is primarily derived from usage-based fees earned from customers accessing the Company’s enterprise cloud computing services. Platform access is considered a monthly series comprising one performance obligation and usage-based fees are recognized as revenue in the period in which the usage occurs. In each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the revenue from usage-based fees represented 84% of total revenue; and in each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the revenue from usage-based fees represented 83% of total revenue.

Subscription-based fees are derived from certain term-based contracts, such as with the sales of telephone numbers, short codes and customer support. Term-based contracts revenue is recognized on a ratable basis over the contractual term of the arrangement beginning on the date that the service is made available to the customer. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the revenue from term-based fees represented 16% of total revenue; and in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the revenue from term-based fees represented 17% of total revenue.

No significant judgments are required in determining whether products and services are considered distinct performance obligations and should be accounted for separately versus together, or to determine the stand-alone selling price (“SSP”).

Refer to Note 10, Revenue by Geographic Area, for additional disaggregation.

The Company’s arrangements do not contain general rights of return. However, credits may be issued on a case-by-case basis. The contracts do not provide customers with the right to take possession of the software supporting the applications. Amounts that have been invoiced are recorded in accounts receivable and in revenue or deferred revenue depending on whether the revenue recognition criteria have been met.

The reserve for sales credits is included in accounts receivable and is calculated based on historical trends and any specific risks identified in processing transactions. Changes in the reserve are recorded against revenue.

Deferred Revenue and Customer Deposits

Deferred revenue is recorded when cash payments are received in advance of future usage on non-cancellable contracts. Customer refundable prepayments are recorded as customer deposits. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company recognized $3.6 million and $7.2 million of revenue, respectively, that was included in the deferred revenue balance, as adjusted for ASC 606 on January 1, 2018.

Deferred Sales Commissions

The Company records an asset for the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer, for example, sales commissions that are earned upon execution of contracts. The Company uses the portfolio method to recognize the amortization expense related to these capitalized costs related to initial contracts, upsells and renewals, and such expense is recognized over the estimated period of benefit of the capitalized commissions, which is determined to be five years. Total net capitalized costs as of June 30, 2018 were $5.2 million and are included in prepaid expenses and other current and long-term assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. Amortization of these assets was $0.3 million and $0.5 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and is included in sales and marketing expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations.

Other than adoption of ASC 606, there were no changes to our significant accounting policies as described in our Annual Report.

(f)Restricted Cash

In November 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) — Restricted Cash”. This standard provides guidance on the presentation of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statements of cash flows. The amendments of this ASU should be applied using a retrospective transition method and are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted ASU 2016-18 in the first quarter of 2018 and applied the guidance retrospectively to the prior period’s condensed consolidated statement of cash flows with the following impact (in thousands):

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	As Originally Reported			As Adjusted
Cash used in investing activities	$	(234,291	)	$	(235,461	)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — beginning of period	$	305,665		$	314,280
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash — end of period	$	92,184		$	99,629

Other than the revised statement of cash flows presentation of restricted cash, the adoption of ASU 2016-18 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

(g) Recently Issued Accounting Guidance, Not yet Adopted

In ~~May 2017,~~July 2018, the ~~Financial~~FASB issued ASU 2018-09, “Codification Improvements”, which does not prescribe any new accounting guidance, but instead makes minor improvements and clarifications of several different FASB Accounting Standards ~~Board (“FASB”)~~Codification areas based on comments and suggestions made by various stakeholders. Certain updates are applicable immediately while others provide for a transition period to adopt as part of the next fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance to determine the impact it may have on its statements of financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In June 2018, the FASB issued ~~Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) 2017-09,~~ASU 2018-07, “~~Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718)~~Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting”, ~~Scope~~which aligns the measurement and classification for share-based payments to non-employees with the accounting guidance for share-based payments to employees. Among other requirements, the measurement of ~~Modification Accounting”, which clarifies when changes to~~non-employee awards will now be fixed at the ~~terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. The~~grant date, rather than remeasured at every reporting date. This guidance is effective ~~prospectively~~ for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, ~~2017 and~~2018, with early ~~adoption is~~application permitted. The Company will adopt this guidance upon its effective date. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have ~~any~~a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”, which removes the second step of the goodwill impairment test that requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. This guidance is effective prospectively for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company will adopt this guidance upon its effective date. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have ~~any~~a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

~~In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “~~~~Business Combinations (Topic 805) Clarifying the Definition of a Business”,~~ ~~which amends the guidance of FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 805, “~~~~Business Combinations~~”, adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions or disposals of assets or businesses. The definition of a business affects many areas of accounting including acquisitions, disposals, goodwill, and consolidation. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted under certain circumstances. The Company will evaluate the impact of this guidance on its financial statements and related disclosures next time there is a potential business combination.

~~In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18,~~ ~~“Restricted Cash”~~, which requires a statement of cash flows to explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this guidance upon its effective date. The restricted cash balances as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were $7.4 million and $8.6 million, respectively.

~~In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16,~~ ~~“Intra-Entity Transfers Other Than Inventory”~~, which requires entities to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. This guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. The Company will adopt this guidance upon its effective date. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have any material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~No.~~ 2016-13, “Financial ~~Instruments -~~ Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”, which changes the impairment model for most financial assets. The new model uses a forward-looking expected loss method, which will generally result in earlier recognition of allowances for losses. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is evaluating the impact of this guidance on its ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU ~~No.~~ 2016-02, “Leases”, which was further clarified by ASU 2018-10, “Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases”~~. The standard will affect~~, and ASU 2018-11, “Leases - Targeted Improvements”, both issued in July 2018. ASU 2016-02 affects all entities that lease assets and will require lessees to recognize a lease liability and a right-of-use asset for all leases (except for short-term leases that have a duration of less than one year) as of the date on which the lessor makes the underlying asset available to the lessee. For lessors, accounting for leases is substantially the same as in prior periods. ~~For public companies,~~ASU 2018-10 clarifies or corrects unintended application of guidance related to ASU 2016-02. The amendments affects narrow aspects of ASU 2016-02 related to the implicit rate in the lease, impairment of the net investment in the lease, lessee reassessment of lease classification, lessor reassessment of lease term and purchase options, variable payments that depend on an index or rate and certain transition adjustments. ASU 2018-11 adds a transition option for all entities and a practical expedient only for lessors. The transition option allows entities to not apply the new leases standard isin the comparative periods they present in their financial statements in the year of adoption. Under the transition option, entities can opt to continue to apply the legacy guidance in ASC 840, “Leases”, including its disclosure requirements, in the comparative periods presented in the year they adopt the new leases standard. Entities that elect this transition option will still be required to adopt the new leases standard using the modified retrospective transition method required by the standard, but they will recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption rather than in the earliest period presented. The practical expedient provides lessors with an option to not separate the non-lease components from the associated lease components when certain criteria are met and requires them to account for the combined component in accordance with the revenue recognition standard in ASC 606 if the associated non-lease components are the predominant components. The new standards are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. For leases existing at, or entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, lessees and lessors must apply a modified retrospective transition approach. While the Company expects the adoption of ~~this standard~~these standards to result in an increase to the reported assets and liabilities, the Company has not yet determined the full impact that the adoption of this standard will have on its ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

~~In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “~~~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~”. This new guidance will replace most existing U.S. GAAP guidance on this topic. The new revenue recognition standard provides a unified model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration for which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which deferred, by one year, the effective date for the new revenue reporting standard for entities reporting under U.S. GAAP. In accordance with the deferral, this guidance will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018 and can be applied either retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. Early adoption is permitted beginning January 1, 2017. In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)”~~ clarifying the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. Specifically, an entity is required to determine whether the nature of a promise is to provide the specified good or service itself (that is, the entity is a principal) or to arrange for the good or service to be provided to the customer by the other party (that is, the entity is an agent). The determination influences the timing and amount of revenue recognition. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, ~~“Revenue from Contracts with Customers, Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,”~~ clarifying the implementation guidance on identifying performance obligations and licensing. Specifically, the amendments reduce the cost and complexity of identifying promised goods or services and improve the guidance for determining whether promises are separately identifiable. The amendments also provide implementation guidance on determining whether an entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied at a point in time) or a right to access the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied over time). In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12 ~~“Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,”~~ which amends the guidance on transition, collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales and other similar taxes. ASU 2016-12 clarifies that, for a contract to be considered completed at transition, all (or substantially all) of the revenue must have been recognized under legacy GAAP. In addition, ASU 2016-12 clarifies how an entity should evaluate the collectability threshold and when an entity can recognize nonrefundable consideration received as revenue if an arrangement does not meet the standard’s contract criteria. In September 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-13, “~~Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Leases (Topic 840), and Leases (Topic 842)”~~. These amendments provide additional clarification and implementation guidance on the previously issued ASUs. These amendments do not change the core principles of the guidance stated in ASU 2014-09, instead they are intended to clarify and improve operability of certain topics included within the revenue standard. The effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-12 are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2014-09. The Company performed its preliminary evaluation and selected a modified retrospective transition method with cumulative effect adjustment as of the standard’s effective date. While the Company has not yet completed the full analysis, based on the evaluation to date, the Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

3. Fair Value Measurements

The ~~Company records certain of its~~following tables provide the financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company’s financial instruments, which include cash, cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, are recorded at their carrying amounts, which approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. Restricted cash is short-term and long-term in nature and consists of cash in a savings account, hence its carrying amount approximates its fair value. Marketable securities consist of U.S. treasury securities and high credit quality corporate debt securities. All marketable securities are considered to be available-for-sale and are recorded at their estimated fair values. Unrealized gains and losses for available-for-sale securities are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss).

Impairments are considered to be other than temporary if they are related to deterioration in credit risk or if it is likely that the security will be sold before the recovery of its cost basis. Realized gains and losses and declines in value deemed to be other than temporary are determined based on the specific identification method and are reported in other income (expense), net.

~~The following tables summarize the Company’s financial assets~~basis as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016 by type (in thousands):~~

Amortized Cost
or Carrying

Net
Unrealized

Fair Value Hierarchy as of September 30, 2017

Aggregate Fair

Value

Losses

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Value

Financial Assets:

Cash and cash equivalents:

Money market funds

$
90,144

$
—

$
90,144

$
—

$
—

$
90,144

Total included in cash and cash equivalents

90,144

—

90,144

—

—

90,144

Marketable securities:

U.S. Treasury securities

59,951

(125
)
59,826

—

—

59,826

Corporate debt securities

132,318

(113
)
—

132,205

—

132,205

Total marketable securities

192,269

(238
)
59,826

132,205

—

192,031

Total financial assets

$
282,413

$
(238
)
$
149,970

$
132,205

$
—

$
282,175

~~There were no marketable securities as of December 31, 2016.~~

Carrying

Fair Value Hierarchy as of December 31, 2016

Aggregate Fair

Value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Value Total

Financial Assets:

Money market funds (included in cash and cash equivalents)

$
274,135

$
274,135

$
—

$
—

$
274,135

Total financial assets

$
274,135

$
274,135

$
—

$
—

$
274,135

The Company classifies its marketable securities as current assets as they are available for current operating needs. The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of marketable securities as of September 30, 2017 (in thousands):

Amortized

Aggregate Fair

Cost

Value

Financial Assets:

Less than one year

$
121,215

$
121,130

One to two years

71,054

70,901

Total

$
192,269

$
192,031

	Amortized Cost or Carrying		Gross Unrealized		Gross Unrealized Losses Less Than			Gross Unrealized Losses More Than			Fair Value Hierarchy as of June 30, 2018						Aggregate
	Value		Gains		12 Months			12 Months			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	434,136	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	434,136	$	—	$	—	$	434,136
Commercial paper	29,905		—		—			—			—		29,905		—		29,905
Total included in cash and cash equivalents	464,041		—		—			—			434,136		29,905		—		464,041
Marketable securities:
U.S. Treasury securities	69,898		—		(59		)	(51		)	69,788		—		—		69,788
Corporate debt securities and commercial paper	232,001		—		(653		)	—			—		231,348		—		231,348
Total marketable securities	301,899		—		(712		)	(51		)	69,788		231,348		—		301,136
Total financial assets	$	765,940	$	—	$	(712	)	$	(51	)	$	503,924	$	261,253	$	—	$	765,177

	Amortized Cost or Carrying		Gross Unrealized		Gross Unrealized Losses Less Than			Gross Unrealized Losses More Than		Fair Value Hierarchy as of December 31, 2017						Aggregate
	Value		Gains		12 Months			12 Months		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	95,432	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	95,432	$	—	$	—	$	95,432
Total included in cash and cash equivalents	95,432		—		—			—		95,432		—		—		95,432
Marketable securities:
U.S. Treasury securities	59,962		—		(216		)	—		59,746		—		—		59,746
Corporate debt securities and commercial paper	116,223		—		(382		)	—		—		115,841		—		115,841
Total marketable securities	176,185		—		(598		)	—		59,746		115,841		—		175,587
Total financial assets	$	271,617	$	—	$	(598	)	$	—	$	155,178	$	115,841	$	—	$	271,019

~~For~~As of June 30, 2018, the fair value of the 0.25% convertible senior notes due 2023 (the “Notes”), as further described in Note 8 below, was approximately $571.6 million. The fair value was determined based on the closing price for the Notes on the last trading day of the reporting period and is considered as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

As the Company views its marketable securities as available to support current operations, it has classified all available for sale securities as short-term. As of June 30, 2018, for fixed income securities that ~~had~~were in unrealized ~~losses as of September 30, 2017,~~loss positions, the Company has determined that (i) it does not have the intent to sell any of these investments, and (ii) it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell any of these investments before recovery of the entire amortized cost basis. In addition, as of June 30, 2018, the Company anticipates that it will recover the entire amortized cost basis of such fixed income securities and has determined that no other-than-temporary ~~impairment existed. As of September~~impairments associated with credit losses were required to be recognized during the three and six month ended June 30, ~~2017, all securities in an unrealized loss position have been in an unrealized loss position for less than one year.~~2018. Interest earned on marketable securities was $0.7 million and $1.4 million in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2018, respectively; and $0.6 million and $1.1 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, ~~was $0.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively, and~~respectively. The interest is recorded as other income (expense), net, in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

The following table summarizes the contractual maturities of marketable securities as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 (in thousands):

	As of June 30, 2018				As of December 31, 2017
	Amortized Cost		Aggregate Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Aggregate Fair Value
Financial Assets:
Less than one year	$	280,947	$	280,339	$	108,584	$	108,360
One to two years	20,952		20,797		67,601		67,227
Total	$	301,899	$	301,136	$	176,185	$	175,587

4. Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of September 30, 2017			As of December 31, 2016			As of June 30,			As of December 31,
							2018			2017
Capitalized software development costs	$	43,571		$	28,661
Capitalized internal-use software development costs							$	61,726		$	49,177
Leasehold improvements	14,208			14,063			14,495			14,246
Office equipment	9,263			5,729			11,119			9,652
Furniture and fixtures	1,902			1,576			2,201			1,976
Software	1,500			968			1,848			1,675
Total property and equipment	70,444			50,997			91,389			76,726
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization	(22,726		)	(13,445		)	(34,668		)	(26,185		)
Total property and equipment, net	$	47,718		$	37,552		$	56,721		$	50,541

Depreciation and amortization expense was ~~$3.4~~$4.3 million and ~~$9.3~~$8.5 million for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, and ~~$1.9~~$3.1 million and ~~$4.9~~$5.9 million for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

The Company capitalized ~~$5.5~~$6.7 million and ~~$15.0~~$13.1 million ofin internal-use software development costs in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, and ~~$3.4~~$5.2 million and $9.5 million in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. Of this amount, ~~the~~ stock-based compensation expense was ~~$1.2~~$1.5 million and ~~$2.8~~$2.9 million in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, and ~~$0.4~~$0.9 million and ~~$1.1~~$1.6 million in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

Amortization of capitalized software development costs was ~~$2.2~~$3.0 million and ~~$5.9~~$5.7 million in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, and ~~$1.4~~$1.9 million and $3.7 million in the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

5. ~~Recent Acquisition~~Business Combinations

OnIn February 6, 2017, the Company completed its acquisition of Beepsend AB, a messaging provider based in Sweden, specializing in messaging and SMS solutions, for a total purchase price of $23.0 million, paid in cash, of which $5.0 million was held in ~~escrow. The~~ escrow ~~will continue for~~with a term of 18 ~~months after the transaction closing date and may be extended under certain circumstances.~~months.

Additionally, the Company deposited $2.0 million into a separate escrow ~~account~~ that ~~will be released~~was subject to ~~certain employees on the first and second anniversaries of the closing date, provided the underlying~~future service conditions ~~are met. This amount is~~and was recorded ~~as prepaid~~ratably into the compensation ~~in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet and is amortized into~~ expense as the services ~~are~~were rendered. As of June 30, 2018, the remaining balance in the escrow was $0.2 million.

The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and ~~accordingly,~~ the total purchase price was allocated to the ~~preliminary~~ net tangible and intangible assets and liabilities based on their ~~preliminary~~ fair values on the acquisition ~~date. The prepaid compensation subject to service conditions is accounted for as a post-acquisition compensation expense~~date and the excess was recorded as research and development expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of operations. We expect to continue to obtain information to assist us in determining the fair values of the net assets acquired on the acquisition date during the measurement period.

goodwill. The acquired entity’s results of operations have been included in the ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements of the Company from the date of acquisition.

The following table presents the ~~preliminary~~ purchase price allocation, as adjusted, recorded in the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet ~~on the acquisition date, and~~ as ~~subsequently adjusted during the three months ended June 30,~~of March 31, 2017 (in thousands):

Total

Net tangible liabilities

$
(3,326
)
Goodwill(1)

12,588

Intangible assets(2)

13,700

Total purchase price

$
22,962

~~The Company acquired a net deferred tax liability of $2.6 million in this business combination.~~

	Total
Net tangible liabilities	$	(3,575	)
Goodwill(1)	12,837
Intangible assets(2)	13,700
Total purchase price	$	22,962

(1) ~~Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed.~~ The goodwill ~~in this transaction~~ is primarily attributable to the future cash flows to be realized from the acquired technology platform, existing customer and supplier relationships as well as operational synergies. Goodwill is deductible for tax purposes.

(2) Identifiable finite-lived intangible assets were comprised of the ~~following:~~following (in thousands):

	Total		Estimated life (in years)	Total		Estimated life (in years)
Developed technology	$	5,000	4	$	5,000	4
Customer relationships	6,100		7-8	6,100		7 - 8
Supplier relationships	2,600		5	2,600		5
Total intangible assets acquired	$	13,700		$	13,700

The Company acquired a net deferred tax liability of $2.6 million in this business combination that is included in long-term liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The estimated fair value of the intangible assets acquired was determined by the Company, and the Company considered or relied in part upon a valuation report of a third-party expert. The Company used the income ~~approaches~~approach to estimate the fair values of the identifiable intangible assets. Specifically, the developed technology asset class was valued using the-relief-from royalty method, while the customer relationships asset class was valued using a multi-period excess earnings method and the supplier relationships asset class was valued using an incremental cash flow method.

The Company incurred costs related to this acquisition of $0.7 million, of which $0.3 million and $0.4 million were incurred during ~~the~~ fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively. All ~~acquisition related~~acquisition-related costs were expensed as incurred and have been recorded in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Pro forma results of operations for this acquisition ~~have~~are not ~~been~~ presented as the financial impact to the Company’s ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements is immaterial.

6. Goodwill and Intangible AssetsI~~ntangible Assets~~

Goodwill

Goodwill balance as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016~~2017 was as ~~follows:~~follows (in thousands):

Total

Balance as of December 31, 2016

$
3,565

Goodwill recorded in connection with the recent acquisition

12,688

Measurement period adjustment

(100
)
Effect of exchange rate

1,254

Balance as of September 30, 2017

$
17,407

	Total
Balance as of December 31, 2017	$	17,851
Effect of exchange rate	(345		)
Balance as of June 30, 2018	$	17,506

Intangible assets

Intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of September 30, 2017							As of June 30, 2018
	Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net		Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Amortizable intangible assets:
Developed technology	$	14,888	$	(4,365	)	$	10,523	$	14,706	$	(7,412	)	$	7,294
Customer relationships	7,096		(774		)	6,322		6,874		(1,384		)	5,490
Supplier relationships	2,854		(364		)	2,490		2,759		(717		)	2,042
Trade name	60		(60		)	—		60		(60		)	—
Patent	1,737		(93		)	1,644		2,127		(140		)	1,987
Total amortizable intangible assets	26,635		(5,656		)	20,979		26,526		(9,713		)	16,813
Non-amortizable intangible assets:
Domain names	32		—			32		32		—			32
Trademarks	263		—			263		263		—			263
Total	$	26,930	$	(5,656	)	$	21,274	$	26,821	$	(9,713	)	$	17,108

	As of December 31, 2016							As of December 31, 2017
	Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net		Gross		Accumulated Amortization			Net
Amortizable intangible assets:
Developed technology	$	9,400	$	(1,140	)	$	8,260	$	14,941	$	(5,476	)	$	9,465
Customer relationships	400		(148		)	252		7,159		(1,006		)	6,153
Supplier relationships								2,881		(500		)	2,381
Trade name	60		(56		)	4		60		(60		)	—
Patent	1,512		(55		)	1,457		1,878		(108		)	1,770
Total amortizable intangible assets	11,372		(1,399		)	9,973		26,919		(7,150		)	19,769
Non-amortizable intangible assets:
Domain names	32		—			32		32		—			32
Trademarks	263		—			263		263		—			263
Total	$	11,667	$	(1,399	)	$	10,268	$	27,214	$	(7,150	)	$	20,064

Amortization expense was ~~$1.5~~$1.4 million and ~~$4.2~~$2.8 million for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, and ~~$0.1~~$1.5 million and ~~$0.4~~$2.7 million for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, respectively.~~2017, respectively

Total estimated future amortization expense was as follows (in thousands):

	As of September 30, 2017		As of June 30, 2018
2017 (remaining 3 months)	$	2,659
2018	5,483
2018 (remaining six months)			$	3,595
2019	5,081		5,092
2020	2,651		2,661
2021	1,518		1,529
2022			933
Thereafter	3,587		3,003
Total	$	20,979	$	16,813

7. Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of September 30,		As of December 31,		As of June 30,		As of December 31,
	2017		2016		2018		2017
Accrued payroll and related	$	5,408	$	3,133	$	10,284	$	4,898
Accrued bonus and commission	3,204		2,251		6,479		4,777
Accrued cost of revenue	11,553		8,741		21,649		10,876
Sales and other taxes payable	19,394		28,795		21,945		20,877
ESPP contributions	3,574		4,364		1,814		1,338
Deferred rent	668		1,250		1,251		1,048
Accrued other expense	11,482		10,774		18,749		9,800
Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities	$	55,283	$	59,308	$	82,171	$	53,614

~~Long-term~~Other long-term liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of September 30,		As of December 31,		As of June 30,		As of December 31,
	2017		2016		2018		2017
Deferred rent	$	9,335	$	9,387	$	7,886	$	8,480
Deferred tax liability	2,780		—
Accrued other expense	434		156
Deferred tax liability, net					1,886		2,452
Accrued other expenses					471		477
Total other long-term liabilities	$	12,549	$	9,543	$	10,243	$	11,409

8. Convertible Senior Notes and Capped Call Transactions

In May 2018, the Company issued $550.0 million aggregate principal amount of 0.25% convertible senior notes due 2023 in a private placement, including $75.0 million aggregate principal amount of such Notes pursuant to the exercise in full of the over-allotment options of the initial purchasers (collectively, the “Notes”). The interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year, beginning on December 1, 2018.

The Notes may bear special interest under specified circumstances relating to the Company’s failure to comply with its reporting obligations under the indenture relating to the issuance of Notes (the “indenture”) or if the Notes are not freely tradeable as required by the indenture. The Notes will mature on June 1, 2023, unless earlier repurchased or redeemed by the Company or converted pursuant to their terms. The total net proceeds from the debt offering, after deducting initial purchaser discounts and debt issuance costs, paid or payable by us, were approximately $537.0 million.

Each $1,000 principal amount of the Notes is initially convertible into 14.1040 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock par value $0.001, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $70.90 per share. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain specified events but will not be adjusted for any accrued and unpaid special interest. In addition, upon the occurrence of a make-whole fundamental change, as defined in the indenture, the Company will, in certain circumstances, increase the conversion rate by a number of additional shares for a holder that elects to convert its Notes in connection with such make-whole fundamental change or during the relevant redemption period.

Prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding March 1, 2023, the Notes may be convertible at the option of the holders only under the following circumstances:

(1) during any calendar quarter commencing after September 30, 2018, and only during such calendar quarter, if the last reported sale price of the Class A common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) in a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on, and including, the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is more than or equal to 130% of the conversion price on each applicable trading day;

(2) during the five business days period after any five consecutive trading day period in which, for each trading day of that period, the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of Notes for such trading day was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of the Class A common stock and the conversion rate on each such trading day;

(3) upon the Company’s notice that it is redeeming any or all of the Notes; or

(4) upon the occurrence of specified corporate events.

On or after March 1, 2023, until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders of the Notes may, at their option, convert all or a portion of their Notes regardless of the foregoing conditions.

Upon conversion, the Company will pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, shares of Class A common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of Class A Common Stock, at the Company’s election. It is the Company’s current intent to settle the principal amount of the Notes with cash.

During the three months ended June 30, 2018, the conditions allowing holders of the Notes to convert were not met. The Company may redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at its option, on or after June 1, 2021 but before the 35th scheduled trading day before the maturity date, at a cash redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, if the last reported sale price of the Class A Common Stock has been at least 130% of the conversion price then in effect for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during any 30 consecutive trading days ending on, and including, the trading day immediately before the date the redemption notices were sent; and the trading day immediately before such notices were sent.

No sinking fund is provided for the Notes. Upon the occurrence of a fundamental change (as defined in the Indenture) prior to the maturity date, holders may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the Notes for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date.

The Notes are senior unsecured obligations and will rank senior in right of payment to any of the Company’s indebtedness that is expressly subordinated in right of payment to the Notes; equal in right of payment with the Company’s existing and future liabilities that are not so subordinated; effectively subordinated to any of the Company’s secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness; and structurally junior to all indebtedness and other liabilities (including trade payables) of current or future subsidiaries of the Company.

The foregoing description is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the indenture and the form of 0.25% convertible senior notes due 2023, which are attached as Exhibits 4.1 and 4.2 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and are incorporated herein by reference.

In accounting for the issuance of the Notes, the Company separated the Notes into liability and equity components. The carrying amount of the liability component was calculated by measuring the fair value of a similar debt instrument that does not have an associated convertible feature. The carrying amount of the equity component representing the conversion option was $119.4 million and was determined by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the par value of the Notes. The equity component is not remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification. The excess of the principal amount of the liability component over its carrying amount, or the debt discount, is amortized to interest expense at an effective interest rate over the contractual terms of the Notes.

In accounting for the transaction costs related to the Notes, the Company allocated the total amount incurred to the liability and equity components of the Notes based on the proportion of the proceeds allocated to the debt and equity components. Issuance costs attributable to the liability component were approximately $10.2 million, were recorded as an additional debt discount and are

amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the contractual terms of the Notes. Issuance costs attributable to the equity component were netted with the equity component in stockholders’ equity.

The net carrying amount of the liability component of the Notes was as follows (in thousands):

	As of June 30, 2018
Principal	$	550,000
Unamortized discount	(116,951		)
Unamortized issuance costs	(9,950		)
Net carrying amount	$	423,099

The net carrying amount of the equity component of the Notes was as follows (in thousands):

	As of June 30, 2018
Proceeds allocated to the conversion options (debt discount)	$	119,435
Issuance costs	(2,819		)
Net carrying amount	$	116,616

The following table sets forth the interest expense recognized related to the Notes (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
Contractual interest expense	$	164
Amortization of debt issuance costs	211
Amortization of debt discount	2,484
Total interest expense related to the Notes	$	2,859

In connection with the offering of the Notes, the Company entered into privately-negotiated capped call transactions with certain counterparties (the “capped calls”). The capped calls each have an initial strike price of approximately $70.90 per share, subject to certain adjustments, which corresponds to the initial conversion price of the Notes. The capped calls have initial cap prices of $105.04 per share, subject to certain adjustments. The capped calls cover, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, approximately 7,757,200 shares of Class A Common Stock. The capped calls are generally intended to reduce or offset the potential dilution to the Class A Common Stock upon any conversion of the Notes with such reduction or offset, as the case may be, subject to a cap based on the cap price. The capped calls expire on the earlier of (i) the last day on which any convertible securities remain outstanding and (ii) June 1, 2023, subject to earlier exercise. The capped calls are subject to either adjustment or termination upon the occurrence of specified extraordinary events affecting the Company, including a merger event, a tender offer, and a nationalization, insolvency or delisting involving the Company. In addition, the capped calls are subject to certain specified additional disruption events that may give rise to a termination of the capped calls, including changes in law, insolvency filings, and hedging disruptions. The capped call transactions are recorded in stockholders’ equity and are not accounted for as derivatives. The net cost of $58.5 million incurred to purchase the capped call transactions was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.

9. Supplemental Balance Sheet Information

A roll-forward of the Company’s reserves is as follows (in thousands):

(a) Allowance for doubtful ~~accounts (in thousands):~~accounts:

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Balance, beginning of period

$
923

$
795

$
1,076

$
486

Additions

125

170

407

1,017

Write-offs

—

(16
)
(435
)
(554
)
Balance, end of period

$
1,048

$
949

$
1,048

$
949

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2018			2017
Balance, beginning of period	$	1,404		$	770		$	1,033		$	1,076
Additions	1,140			210			1,515			282
Write-offs	(8		)	(57		)	(12		)	(435		)
Balance, end of period	$	2,536		$	923		$	2,536		$	923

~~(b)~~ b)Sales credit ~~reserve (in thousands):~~reserve:

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Balance, beginning of period

$
734

$
652

$
544

$
714

Additions

104

169

1,076

1,012

Deductions against reserve

(238
)
(337
)
(1,020
)
(1,242
)
Balance, end of period

$
600

$
484

$
600

$
484

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2018			2017
Balance, beginning of period	$	1,702		$	818		$	1,761		$	544
Additions	1,544			421			2,651			972
Deductions against reserve	(621		)	(505		)	(1,787		)	(782		)
Balance, end of period	$	2,625		$	734		$	2,625		$	734

9.10. Revenue by Geographic Area

Revenue by geographic area is based on the IP address at the time of registration. The following table sets forth revenue by geographic area (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Revenue by geographic area:
United States	$	76,713		$	60,535		$	221,914		$	165,528		$	111,244		$	75,103		$	209,879		$	145,201
International	23,829			10,998			61,870			29,855			36,510			20,767			66,991			38,041
Total	$	100,542		$	71,533		$	283,784		$	195,383		$	147,754		$	95,870		$	276,870		$	183,242
Percentage of revenue by geographic area:
United States	76		%	85		%	78		%	85		%	75		%	78		%	76		%	79		%
International	24		%	15		%	22		%	15		%	25		%	22		%	24		%	21		%

Long-lived assets outside the United States were not significant.

~~10.~~11. Commitments and Contingencies

(a) Lease Commitments

The Company entered into various non-cancelable operating lease agreements for its facilities that expire over the next ~~seven~~six years. Certain operating leases contain provisions under which monthly rent escalates over time. When lease agreements contain escalating rent clauses or free rent periods, the Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

Rent expense was $2.1 million and ~~$6.1~~$4.2 million for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, and $2.1 million and ~~$5.1~~$4.0 million for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases were as follows (in thousands):

Year Ending December 31:	As of September 30, 2017		As of June 30, 2018
2017 (remaining three months)	$	1,958
2018	7,326
2018 (remaining six months)			$	4,604
2019	7,375		8,070
2020	7,068		7,102
2021	7,033		7,033
2022			5,864
Thereafter	16,052		10,189
Total minimum lease payments	$	46,812	$	42,862

Additionally, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company entered into several non-cancellable vendor agreements with a term from one to two years for total purchase commitments of $3.3 million and $7.8 million, respectively.

(b) Legal Matters

On April 30, 2015, Telesign Corporation, or Telesign, filed a lawsuit against the Company in the United States District Court, Central District of California (“Telesign I”). Telesign alleges that the Company is infringing three U.S. patents that it holds: U.S. Patent No. 8,462,920 (“‘920”), U.S. Patent No. 8,687,038 (“‘038”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,945,034 (“‘034”). The patent infringement allegations in the lawsuit relate to the Company’s ~~Programmable Authentication~~Account Security products, its two-factor authentication use case and an API tool to find information about a phone number. The Company ~~has~~ petitioned the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“U.S. PTO”) for inter partes review of the patents at issue. On July 8, 2016, the ~~U.S.~~ PTO denied the Company’s petition for inter partes review of the ‘920 and ‘038 ~~patents. After the U.S. PTO held its hearing on the ‘034 patent~~ ~~inter partes~~ ~~review,~~patents, and on June 26, 2017, it upheld the patentability of the ‘034 ~~patent, adopting Telesign’s narrow construction of its~~ patent.

On March 28, 2016, Telesign filed a second lawsuit against the Company in the United States District Court, Central District of California (“Telesign II”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,300,792 ~~(“‘~~(‘792”) held by Telesign. The ‘792 patent is in the same patent family as the ‘920 and ‘038 patents asserted in Telesign I. On March 8, 2017, in response to a petition by the Company,

the ~~U.S.~~ PTO issued an order instituting the inter partes review for the ‘792 patent. ~~A final written decision is expected~~On March 6, 2018, the PTO found all claims challenged by ~~March 2018.~~Twilio in the inter partes review unpatentable. On March 15, 2017, Twilio filed a motion to consolidate and stay related cases pending the conclusion of the ~~now instituted~~ ‘792 patent inter partes ~~review. On May 16, 2017,~~review, which the court ~~issued an order~~granted. The Central District of California court lifted the stay on April 13, 2018. The court transferred the cases to ~~consolidate~~ the ~~Telesign I and Telesign II matters and stay the consolidated case until the completion~~United States District Court, Northern District of ~~the~~ ~~inter partes~~ ~~review of the ‘792 patent.~~California. With respect to each of the patents asserted in the now-consolidated Telesign I and Telesign II cases (“TeleSign I/II”), the ~~complaints seek,~~consolidated complaint seeks, among other things, to enjoin the Company from allegedly infringing the patents, along with damages for lost profits. The Telesign I/II litigation is currently ongoing.

On December 1, 2016, the Company filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Telesign in the United States District Court, Northern District of California (“Telesign III”), alleging indirect infringement of United States Patent No. 8,306,021 (“021”), United States Patent No. 8,837,465 (“465”), United States Patent No. 8,755,376 (“376”), United States Patent No. 8,736,051 (“051”), United States Patent No. 8,737,962 (“962”), United States Patent No. 9,270,833 (“833”), and United States Patent No. ~~9,226,217.~~9,226,217 (“217”). Telesign filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on January 25, 2017. In two orders, issued on March 31, 2017 and April 17, 2017, the Court granted Telesign’s motion to dismiss with respect to the ‘962, ‘833, ‘051 and ‘217 patents, but denied Telesign’s motion to dismiss as to the ‘021, ‘465 and ‘376 patents. ~~This litigation~~On August 23, 2017, Telesign petitioned the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“U.S. PTO”) for inter partes review of the ‘021, ‘465, and ‘376 patents. On March 9, 2018, the PTO denied Telesign’s petition for inter partes review of the ‘021 patent and granted Telesign’s petitions for inter partes review of the ‘465 and ‘376 patents. Telesign III is currently ~~ongoing.~~stayed pending resolution of the inter partes reviews of the ‘465 and ‘376 patents. The Company is seeking a judgment of infringement, a judgment of willful infringement, monetary and injunctive relief, enhanced damages, and an award of costs and expenses against Telesign.

On February 18, 2016, a putative class action complaint was filed in the Alameda County Superior Court in California, entitled Angela Flowers v. Twilio Inc. The complaint alleges that the Company’s products permit the interception, recording and disclosure of communications at a customer’s request and are in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act. The complaint seeks injunctive relief as well as monetary damages. On May 27, 2016, the Company filed a demurrer to the complaint. On August 2, 2016, the court issued an order denying the demurrer in part and granted it in part, with leave to amend by August 18, 2016 to address any claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law. The plaintiff opted not to amend the complaint. ~~Discovery has already begun, and~~Following a ~~hearing on~~period of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for class certification ~~motion is set~~on September 20, 2017. On January 2, 2018, the court issued an order granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff’s class certification motion. The court certified two classes of individuals who, during specified time periods, allegedly sent or received certain communications involving the accounts of three of the Company’s customers that were recorded. The court has not yet finalized a schedule for ~~December 2017.~~notice to potential class members, additional discovery, summary judgment motions, or trial.

The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against these lawsuits and believes it has meritorious defenses to each matter in which it is a defendant. It is too early in these matters to reasonably predict the probability of the outcomes or to estimate ranges of possible losses.

In addition to the litigation matters discussed above, from time to time, the Company is a party to legal action and subject to claims that arise in the ordinary course of business. The claims are investigated as they arise and loss estimates are accrued, when probable and reasonably estimable. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of these matters, the Company believes that these legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.

Legal fees and other costs related to litigation and other legal proceedings are expensed as incurred and are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

(c) Indemnification Agreements

The Company has signed indemnification agreements with all of its board members and executive officers. The agreements indemnify the board members and executive officers from claims and expenses on actions brought against the individuals separately or jointly with the Company for certain indemnifiable events. Indemnifiable Events generally mean any event or occurrence related to the fact that the board member or the executive officer was or is acting in his or her capacity as a board member or an executive officer for the Company or was or is acting or representing the interests of the Company.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into contractual arrangements under which it agrees to provide indemnification of varying scope and terms to business partners and other parties with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, losses arising out of the breach of such agreements, intellectual property infringement claims made by third parties and other liabilities relating to or arising from the Company’s various products, or its acts or omissions. In these circumstances, payment may be conditional on the other party making a claim pursuant to the procedures specified in the particular contract. Further, the

Company’s obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of time and/or amount, and in some instances, the Company may have recourse against third parties for certain payments. The terms of such obligations may vary.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, no amounts were accrued.

(d) Other ~~taxes~~Taxes

The Company conducts operations in many tax jurisdictions throughout the United States. In many of these jurisdictions, non-income-based taxes, such as sales and use and telecommunications taxes are assessed on the Company’s operations. Prior to March 2017, the Company had not billed nor collected these taxes from its customers and, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, recorded a provision for its tax exposure in these jurisdictions when it iswas both probable that a liability ~~has~~had been incurred and the amount of the exposure ~~can~~could be reasonably estimated. Effective March 2017, the Company began collecting these taxes from customers in certain jurisdictions and intends to collect in other jurisdictions in the near term. As a result, the Company recorded a liability of $29.0 million and $28.8 million as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. These estimates ~~include~~included several key assumptions including, but not limited to, the taxability of the Company’s services, the jurisdictions in which its management ~~believes~~believed it has nexus, and the sourcing of revenues to those jurisdictions. Starting in March 2017, the Company began collecting these taxes from customers in certain jurisdictions, and since then has expanded the number of jurisdictions where these taxes are being collected. Effective January 2018, the Company began collecting taxes in one additional jurisdiction and accordingly, the Company is no longer recording a provision for its exposure in that jurisdiction. The Company expects to continue to expand the number of jurisdictions where these taxes will be collected in the future. Simultaneously, the Company was and continues to be in discussions with certain states regarding its prior state sales and other taxes, if any, that the Company may owe.

During ~~the three months ended June 30,~~ 2017, the Company revised its estimates of its tax exposure based on settlements reached with various states indicating that certain revisions to the key assumptions including, but not limited to, the sourcing of revenue and the taxability of the Company’s services were ~~appropriate in the current period.~~appropriate. In the ~~nine months~~year ended ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2017, the total impact of these changes on the net loss attributable to common stockholders was a reduction of ~~$13.1 million, or $0.14 per share.~~$13.4 million. As of ~~September~~June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the ~~total~~ liability ~~related to~~recorded for these taxes was ~~$19.4 million.~~$21.9 million and $20.9 million, respectively.

On June 21, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an opinion in South Dakota v. Wayfair permitting a state to require a seller to collect sales tax even if the seller has no physical presence in that state. This opinion reversed a prior U.S. Supreme Court opinion requiring a physical presence by the seller. We are evaluating the opinion as it applies to our facts and circumstances.

In the event other jurisdictions challenge management’s assumptions and analysis, the actual exposure could differ materially from the current estimates.

~~11.~~12. Stockholders’ Equity

(a) Preferred Stock

As of ~~September~~June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had authorized 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001, of which no shares were issued and outstanding.

(b) Common Stock

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company had authorized 1,000,000,000 shares of Class A common stock and 100,000,000 shares of Class B common stock, each par value $0.001 per share. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, 68,671,207~~2018, 76,511,357 shares of Class A common stock and ~~24,248,777~~20,828,123 shares of Class B common stock were issued and outstanding. As of December 31, ~~2016, 49,996,410~~2017, 69,906,550 shares of Class A common stock and ~~37,252,138~~24,063,246 shares of Class B common stock were issued and outstanding.

The Company had reserved shares of common stock for issuance as follows:

	As of September 30,	As of December 31,	As of June 30,	As of December 31,
	2017	2016	2018	2017
Stock options issued and outstanding	11,380,189	14,649,276	9,527,562	10,710,427
Nonvested restricted stock units issued and outstanding	4,384,898	2,034,217	7,705,589	5,665,459
Class A common stock reserved for Twilio.org	680,397	680,397	635,014	635,014
Stock-based awards available for grant under 2016 Plan	11,601,980	10,143,743	10,877,345	10,200,189
Class A common stock reserved for issuance under 2016 ESPP	224,126	597,038
Stock-based awards available for grant under 2016 ESPP*			3,216,460	2,478,343
Class A common stock reserved for the convertible senior notes			10,472,165	—
Total	28,271,590	28,104,671	42,434,135	29,689,432

* Class A common stock committed for purchase under the 2016 ESPP was 131,581 shares and 235,372 shares as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

~~12.~~13. Stock-Based Compensation

2008 Stock Option Plan

The Company granted options under its 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “2008 Plan”), as amended and restated, until June 22, 2016, when the plan was terminated in connection with the Company’s IPO. Accordingly, no shares are available for future issuance under the 2008 Plan. The 2008 Plan continues to govern outstanding equity awards granted thereunder.

2016 Stock Option Plan

The Company’s 2016 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”) became effective on June 21, 2016. The 2016 Plan provides for the grant of ISOs, NSOs, restricted stock, RSUs, stock appreciation rights, unrestricted stock awards, performance share awards, dividend equivalent rights and cash-based awards to employees, directors and consultants of the Company. A total of 11,500,000 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock were initially reserved for issuance under the 2016 Plan. These available shares automatically increase each January 1, beginning on January 1, 2017, by 5% of the number of shares of the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock outstanding on the immediately preceding December 31, or such lesser number of shares as determined by the Company’s compensation committee. On January 1, ~~2017,~~2018, the shares available for grant under the 2016 Plan were automatically increased by ~~4,362,427~~4,698,490 shares.

Under the 2016 Plan, the stock options are granted at a price per share not less than 100% of the fair market value per share of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Under both plans, stock options generally expire 10 years from the date of grant and vest over periods determined by the board of directors. The vesting period for new-hire options and restricted stock units is generally a four-year term from the date of grant, at a rate of 25% after one year, then monthly or quarterly, respectively, on a straight-line basis thereafter. In July 2017, the Company began granting restricted stock units to existing employees that vest in equal quarterly installments over a four year service period.

2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“2016 ESPP”) became effective on June 21, 2016. A total of 2,400,000 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock were initially reserved for issuance under the 2016 ESPP. These available shares will automatically increase each January 1, beginning on January 1, 2017, by the lesser of 1,800,000 shares of the common stock, 1% of the number of shares of the Company’s Class A and Class B common stock outstanding on the immediately preceding December 31 or such lesser number of shares as determined by the Company’s compensation committee. On January 1, ~~2017,~~2018, the shares available for grant under the 2016 Plan were automatically increased by ~~872,485~~939,698 shares.

The 2016 ESPP allows eligible employees to purchase shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at a discount of up to 15% through payroll deductions of their eligible compensation, subject to any plan limitations. Except for the initial offering period, the 2016 ESPP provides for separate six-month offering periods beginning in May and November of each fiscal year, starting in May 2017.

On each purchase date, eligible employees ~~will~~ purchase the Company’s stock at a price per share equal to 85% of the lesser of (i) the fair market value of the Company’s Class A common stock on the offering date or (ii) the fair market value of the Company’s Class A common stock on the purchase date.

In the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, 201,581 and 580,705 shares of ~~the Company’s~~ Class A common stock were purchased under the 2016 ESPP, respectively, and ~~224,126~~131,581 shares are expected to be purchased in ~~the fourth quarter of 2017.~~

November 2018. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, total unrecognized compensation cost related to the 2016 ESPP was ~~$0.3~~$1.4 million, which will be amortized over a weighted-average period of ~~0.13~~0.4 years.

~~Stock option~~Stock-based awards activity under the 2008 Plan and ~~the~~ 2016 Plan ~~during the nine months ended September 30, 2017~~ was as follows:

Stock Options

Number of
options
outstanding

Weighted-
average
exercise
price
(per
share)

Weighted-
average
remaining
contractual
term
(in years)

Aggregate
intrinsic
value
(in
thousands)

Outstanding options as of December 31, 2016

14,649,276

$
6.14

7.52

$
332,716

Granted

1,443,335

31.06

Exercised

(4,615,225
)
4.88

Forfeited and cancelled

(652,197
)
7.93

Outstanding options as of September 30, 2017

10,825,189

$
9.89

7.37

$
218,574

Options vested and exercisable as of September 30, 2017

5,166,349

$
5.30

6.54

$
126,828

	Number of options outstanding		Weighted- average exercise price (per share)		Weighted- average remaining contractual term (in years)	Aggregate intrinsic value (in thousands)
Outstanding options as of December 31, 2017	10,155,427		$	10.31	7.12	$	145,763
Granted	1,140,048		33.99
Exercised	(2,150,801	)	6.38
Forfeited and cancelled	(172,112	)	8.54
Outstanding options as of June 30, 2018	8,972,562		$	14.29	7.25	$	374,398
Options vested and exercisable as of June 30, 2018	4,825,743		$	8.60	6.35	$	228,834

Aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the fair value of the Company’s Class A common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange and the exercise price of outstanding “in-the-money” options. Prior to the IPO, the fair value of the Company’s common stock was estimated by the Company’s board of directors. After the IPO, the fair value of the Company’s common stock is the Company’s Class A common stock price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised was ~~$18.6~~$43.4 million and ~~$119.3~~$74.5 million ~~for~~during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, and ~~$4.4~~$22.5 million and ~~$15.7~~$100.7 million ~~for~~during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively.

The total estimated grant date fair value of options vested was ~~$3.0~~$4.8 million and ~~$12.2~~$12.8 million ~~for~~during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, and ~~$4.9~~$4.6 million and ~~$11.4~~$8.7 million ~~for~~during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September 30, 2016, respectively. No options were granted in the three months ended September~~June 30, 2017, ~~and 2016.~~ respectively.

The weighted-average grant-date fair value per share of options granted inwas $19.1 and $15.7 during the ~~nine~~three and six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018, respectively, and ~~2016 was~~$11.46 and $13.48 during the three and ~~$5.52,~~six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.

On February 28, 2017, the Company granted a total of 555,000 shares of performance-based stock options in three distinct awards to an employee with grant date fair values of $13.48, $10.26 and $8.41 per share for a total grant value of $5.9 million. The first half of each award vests upon satisfaction of a performance condition and the remainder vests thereafter in equal monthly installments over a 24-month period. The achievement window expires after 4.3 years from the date of grant and the stock options expire seven years after the date of grant. The performance condition for the first award was satisfied on March 31, 2018.

The stock options are amortized over a derived service period, as adjusted, of ~~three~~3.1 years, ~~4.25~~4.6 years and ~~4.75~~5.4 years, respectively. The stock options value and the derived service period were estimated using the Monte-Carlo simulation model. The following table summarizes the details of the performance options:

	Number of options outstanding	Weighted- average exercise price (per share)		Weighted- average remaining contractual term (in years)	Aggregate intrinsic value (in thousands)		Number of options outstanding	Weighted- average exercise price (per share)		Weighted- average remaining contractual term (in years)	Aggregate intrinsic value (in thousands)
Outstanding options as of December 31, 2016	—	$	—	—	$	—
Outstanding options as of December 31, 2017							555,000	$	31.72	6.0	$	—
Granted	555,000	31.72					—	—
Exercised	—	—					—	—
Forfeited and cancelled	—	—					—	—
Outstanding options as of September 30, 2017	555,000	$	31.72	6.41	$	—
Options vested and exercisable as of September 30, 2017	—	$	—	—	$	—
Outstanding options as of June 30, 2018							555,000	$	31.72	5.9	$	13,487
Options vested and exercisable as of June 30, 2018							92,500	$	31.72	5.9	$	2,248

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, total unrecognized compensation cost related to ~~all non-vested~~nonvested stock options was ~~$38.6~~$42.1 million, which will be amortized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.

Restricted Stock Units

	Number of awards outstanding		Weighted- average grant date fair value (per share)		Aggregate intrinsic value (in thousands)		Number of awards outstanding		Weighted- average grant date fair value (per share)		Aggregate intrinsic value (in thousands)
Nonvested RSUs as of December 31, 2016	2,034,217		$	32.66	$	58,687
Nonvested RSUs as of December 31, 2017							5,665,459		$	29.29	$	133,648
Granted	3,093,326						3,459,051		35.5
Vested	(492,757	)					(1,041,782	)	28.8
Forfeited and cancelled	(249,888	)					(377,139	)	28.9
Nonvested RSUs as of September 30, 2017	4,384,898		$	30.86	$	130,818
Nonvested RSUs as of June 30, 2018							7,705,589		$	32.2	$	431,652

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested RSUs was ~~$121.1~~$229.7 million, which will be amortized over a weighted-average period of ~~3.26~~3.2 years.

~~Equity Awards Granted to Nonemployees~~

In September 2016, the Company granted 30,255 restricted stock units to a nonemployee. The award is vested upon the satisfaction of a service condition over two years starting in August 2015. The stock-based compensation expense recorded for this award during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

~~As of September 30, 2017, there were no nonemployee awards outstanding.~~

~~Early Exercises of Nonvested Options~~

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company recorded a liability of $0.1 million and $0.3 million for 16,033 and 49,580 unvested shares, respectively, that were early exercised by employees and were subject to repurchase at the respective period end. These amounts are reflected in current and non-current liabilities on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Valuation Assumptions

The fair value of employee stock options ~~under our equity incentive plans and purchase rights under the ESPP~~ was estimated on the date of grant using the following assumptions in the Black-Scholes option pricing model:

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Employee Stock Options:

Fair value of common stock

*

*

$24.77 -$31.96

$10.09-$15.00

Expected term (in years)

*

*

6.08

6.08

Expected volatility

*

*

46.1%-47.6%

51.4%-53.0%

Risk-free interest rate

*

*

1.9%-2.1%

1.3%-1.5%

Dividend rate

*

*

0%

0%

*No stock options were granted in the period.

									Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
									2018			2017			2018			2017
Employee Stock Options:
Fair value of common stock									$	41.22		$	24.77		$	33.01- $41.22		$	24.77 -$31.96
Expected term (in years)									6.08			6.08			6.08			6.08
Expected volatility									44.16		%	46.1		%	44.09%-44.16%			46.1%-47.6%
Risk-free interest rate									2.86		%	1.9		%	2.74%-2.86%			1.9%-2.1%
Dividend rate									0		%	0		%	0		%	0		%

Employee Stock Purchase Plan:
Expected term (in years)	0.5		0.9		0.5		0.9		0.5			0.5			0.5			0.5
Expected volatility	33.2	%	52	%	33.2	%	52	%	39.78		%	33.2		%	39.78		%	33.2		%
Risk-free interest rate	1.1	%	0.6	%	1.1	%	0.6	%	2.09		%	1.1		%	2.09		%	1.1		%
Dividend rate	0	%	0	%	0	%	0	%	0		%	0		%	0		%	0		%

The following assumptions were used in the Monte Carlo simulation model to estimate the fair value and the derived service period of the performance options:

Asset volatility	40		%	40		%
Equity volatility	45		%	45		%
Discount rate	14		%	14		%
Stock price at grant date	$	31.72		$	31.72

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Scope of Modification Accounting”, ASU 2017-09 clarifies when changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award must be accounted for as modifications. ASU 2017-09 allows companies to make certain changes to awards, such as vesting conditions, without accounting for them as modifications. It does not change the accounting for modifications. ASU 2017-09 should be applied prospectively to awards modified on or after the adoption date. The Company adopted ASU 2017-09 in the first quarter of 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Stock-Based Compensation Expense

The Company recorded total stock-based compensation expense as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Cost of revenue

$
180

$
84

$
460

$
135

Research and development

6,493

3,741

16,687

7,636

Sales and marketing

2,603

1,432

6,961

3,282

General and administrative

4,912

2,391

11,865

4,596

Total

$
14,188

$
7,648

$
35,973

$
15,649

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
Cost of revenue	$	266	$	142	$	488	$	280
Research and development	9,749		5,710		17,621		10,194
Sales and marketing	5,049		2,363		8,908		4,358
General and administrative	5,942		4,185		11,529		6,953
Total	$	21,006	$	12,400	$	38,546	$	21,785

~~13.~~14. Net Loss ~~per~~Per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders

Basic and diluted net loss per common share is presented in conformity with the two-class method required for participating securities.

Class A and Class B common stock are the only outstanding equity in the Company. The rights of the holders of Class A and Class B common stock are identical, except with respect to voting and conversion. Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote per share and each share of Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes per share. Shares of Class B common stock may be converted into Class A common stock at any time at the option of the stockholder, and are automatically converted into Class A common stock upon sale or transfer, subject to certain limited exceptions.

Basic net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares and, if dilutive, potential common shares outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of these potential common shares is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method.

The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders during the periods presented (in thousands, except share and per share data):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(23,453	)	$	(11,254	)	$	(44,789	)	$	(28,716	)	$	(24,006	)	$	(7,109	)	$	(47,735	)	$	(21,336	)
Weighted-average shares used to compute basic and diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders	92,156,768			83,887,901			90,543,087			42,030,989
Weighted-average shares used to compute net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted													96,348,356			90,873,305			95,515,583			89,722,874
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.49	)	$	(0.68	)	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.08	)	$	(0.50	)	$	(0.24	)

The following outstanding shares of common stock equivalents were excluded from the calculation of the diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders because their effect would have been anti-dilutive:

As of September 30,

2017

2016

Issued and outstanding options

11,380,189

16,476,973

Nonvested RSUs issued and outstanding

4,384,898

1,639,378

Common stock reserved for Twilio.org

680,397

780,397

Shares committed under 2016 ESPP

224,126

604,865

Unvested shares subject to repurchase

16,033

74,451

Total

16,685,643

19,576,064

	As of June 30,
	2018	2017
Stock options issued and outstanding	9,527,562	12,491,714
Nonvested restricted stock units issued and outstanding	7,705,589	3,686,232
Class A common stock reserved for Twilio.org	635,014	680,397
Class A common stock committed under 2016 ESPP	131,581	227,462
Unvested shares subject to repurchase	334	27,844
Total	18,000,080	17,113,649

Since the Company expects to settle the principal amount of its outstanding convertible senior notes in cash and any excess in shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, the Company uses the treasury stock method for calculating any potential dilutive effect of the conversion spread on diluted net income per share, if applicable. The conversion spread will have a dilutive impact on diluted net income per share of Class A common stock when the average market price of the Company’s Class A common stock for a given period exceeds the conversion price of $70.90 per share for the Notes.

~~14. Transactions with Investors~~15. Income Taxes

In ~~2015, two~~October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, ‘‘Intra-Entity Transfers Other Than Inventory’’, which requires entities to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The Company adopted ASU 2016-16 in the first quarter 2018. Adoption of the ~~Company’s vendors participated in~~ASU did not have any impact on the Company’s Series E convertible preferred stock financing and owned approximately 1.9% and 1.0%, respectively, of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of September 30, 2017, and 2.0% and 1.0%, respectively, of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of December 31, 2016. The amount of software services the Company purchased from the first vendor was $5.3 million and $14.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $3.7 million and $10.3 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. The net amount due to this vendor as of September 30, 2017 was $1.9 million. The amounts due to or from this vendor as of December 31, 2016 were insignificant.financial statements.

The ~~amount~~Company determines its income tax provision or benefit for interim periods using an estimate of ~~services~~its annual effective tax rate, adjusted for discrete items occurring in the quarter. The primary difference between the Company’s effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate relates to the net operating losses in jurisdictions with a valuation allowance or a zero tax rate.

The Company ~~purchased from the second vendor was~~recorded a provision for income taxes of $0.2 ~~million and $0.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively, and $0.1~~ million and $0.3 million for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, respectively.~~2018, respectively, and $0.5 million for both the three and the six months ended June 30, 2017. The provision for income taxes consists primarily of income taxes and withholding taxes in foreign jurisdictions in which the Company conducts business. The Company’s U.S. operations have been in a loss position and the Company maintains a full valuation allowance against its U.S. deferred tax assets.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code including, but not limited to, (1) reducing the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent; (2) requiring companies to pay a one-time transition tax on certain unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries; (3) generally eliminating U.S. federal income taxes on dividends from foreign subsidiaries; (4) requiring a current inclusion in U.S. federal taxable income of certain earnings of controlled foreign corporations; (5) eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) and changing how existing AMT credits can be realized; (6) creating the base erosion anti-abuse tax (“BEAT”), a new minimum tax; (7) creating a new limitation on deductible interest expense; and (8) changing rules related to uses and limitations of net ~~amounts due from this vendor as of September 30, 2017 and~~operating loss carryforwards created in tax years beginning after December 31, ~~2016 were insignificant.~~

~~15. Employee Benefit Plan~~2017.

The SEC staff issued SAB 118, which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Act. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740. The Company ~~sponsors~~has not completed its accounting assessment for the effects of the Tax Act as of June 30, 2018; however, the final accounting assessment will occur no later than one year from the date the Tax Act was enacted. The Company has also considered and estimated a ~~401(k) defined contribution plan covering all employees. The employer contribution to~~number of provisions of the ~~plan was $0.3 million~~Tax Act effective January 1, 2018 and, ~~$1.6 million in~~based on the initial assessment, the Company has determined that the Tax Act did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, respectively, and $0.2 million and $0.9 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively~~2018.

***********

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In addition to historical financial information, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that isare based upon current plans, expectations and beliefs that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our fiscal year ends on December 31.

Overview

We are the leader in the Cloud Communications Platform category. We enable developers to build, scale and operate real-time communications within their software applications via our simple-to-use Application Programming Interfaces ~~or APIs.~~(“API”). The power, flexibility, and reliability offered by our software building blocks empowers companies of virtually every shape and size to build world-class engagement into their customer experience.

Our platform consists of three layers: our Engagement Cloud, Programmable Communications Cloud and Super Network. Our Engagement Cloud software is a set of APIs that handles the ~~higher-level~~higher level communication logic needed for nearly every type of customer engagement. These APIs are focused ~~more~~ on ~~what~~the business challenges that a developer is looking to ~~accomplish, rather than~~ ~~how~~ ~~to do it, thereby~~address, allowing our customers to more quickly and easily build better ways to engage with their ~~customers.~~customers throughout their journey. Our Programmable Communications Cloud software is a set of APIs that enables developers to embed voice, messaging and video capabilities into their applications. The Programmable Communications Cloud is designed to support almost all the fundamental ways humans communicate, unlocking innovators to address just about any communication market. The Super Network is our software layer that

allows our customers’ software to communicate with connected devices globally. It interconnects with communications networks around the world and continually analyzes data to optimize the quality and cost of communications that flow through our platform. The Super Network also contains a set of ~~API’s giving~~APIs that gives our customers access to more foundational components of our platform, like phone numbers.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, our customers’ applications that are embedded with our products could reach users via voice, messaging and video in nearly every country in the world, and our platform offered customers local telephone numbers in over 100 countries and text-to-speech functionality in 26 languages. We support our global business through 27 cloud data centers in nine regions around the world and have developed contractual relationships with network service providers globally.

Our business model is primarily focused on reaching and serving the needs of software developers, who we believe are becoming increasingly influential in technology decisions in a wide variety of companies. We call this approach our Business Model for Innovators, which empowers developers by reducing friction and upfront costs, encouraging experimentation, and enabling developers to grow as customers as their ideas succeed. We established and maintain our leadership position by engaging directly with, and cultivating, our developer community, which has led to the rapid adoption of our platform. We reach developers through community events and conferences, including our SIGNAL developer conferences, to demonstrate how every developer can create differentiated applications incorporating communications using our products.

Once developers are introduced to our platform, we provide them with a ~~low-friction~~low friction trial experience. By accessing our easy-to-adopt APIs, extensive self-service documentation and customer support team, developers build our products into their applications and then test such applications through free trials. Once they have decided to use our products beyond the initial free trial period, customers provide their credit card information and only pay for the actual usage of our products. Historically, we have acquired the substantial majority of our customers through this self-service model. As customers expand their usage of our platform, our relationships with them often evolve to include business leaders within their organizations. Once our customers reach a certain spending level with us, we support them with account executives or customer success advocates within our sales organization to ensure their satisfaction and expand their usage of our products.

When potential customers do not have the available developer resources to build their own applications, we refer them to our network of Solution Partners, who embed our products in their solutions, such as software for contact centers, sales force automation and marketing automation that they sell to other businesses.

We ~~are supplementing~~supplement our self-service model with a sales effort aimed at engaging larger potential customers, strategic leads and existing customers through a direct sales approach. We ~~have supplemented~~augment this sales effort with the Twilio Enterprise Plan, which provides capabilities for advanced security, access management and granular administration, and is targeted at the needs of enterprise scale customers. Our sales organization works with technical and business leaders who are seeking to leverage software to drive competitive differentiation. As we educate these leaders on the benefits of developing applications that incorporate our products to differentiate their business, they often consult with their developers regarding implementation. We believe that developers are often advocates for our products as a result of our developer-focused approach. Our sales organization includes sales development, inside sales, field sales, sales engineering and customer success personnel.

We generate the substantial majority of our revenue from customers based on their usage of our software products that they have incorporated into their applications. In addition, customers typically purchase one or more telephone numbers from us, for which we charge a monthly flat fee per number. Some customers also choose to purchase various levels of premium customer support for a monthly fee. Customers that register in our self-service model typically pay ~~up-front~~upfront via credit card and draw down their balance as they purchase or use our products. Most of our customers draw down their balance in the same month they pay up front and, as a result, our deferred revenue and customer deposits liability at any particular time is not a meaningful indicator of future revenue. As our customers’ usage grows, some of our customers enter into contracts and are invoiced monthly in arrears. Many of these customer contracts have terms of 12 months and typically include some level of minimum revenue commitment. Most customers with minimum revenue commitment contracts generate a significant amount of revenue in excess of their minimum revenue commitment in any period. Historically, the aggregate minimum commitment revenue from customers with ~~which~~whom we have contracts has constituted a minority of our revenue in any period, and we expect this to continue in the future.

Our developer-focused products are delivered to customers and users through our Super Network, which uses software to optimize communications on our platform. We interconnect with communications networks globally to deliver our products, and therefore we have arrangements with network service providers in many regions ~~throughout~~in the world. Historically, a substantial majority of our cost of revenue has been network service provider fees. We continue to optimize our network service provider coverage and connectivity through continuous improvements in routing and sourcing in order to lower the usage expenses we incur for network service provider fees. As we benefit from our platform optimization efforts, we sometimes pass these savings on to customers in the form of lower usage prices on our products in an effort to drive increased usage and expand the reach and scale of our platform. In the

near term, we intend to operate our business to expand the reach and scale of our platform and to grow our revenue, rather than to maximize our gross margins.

We have achieved significant growth in recent periods. ~~For~~In the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, our revenue was ~~$100.5~~$147.8 million and ~~$71.5~~$95.9 million, respectively. In the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, our 10 largest Active Customer Accounts generated an aggregate of 17% and ~~31%~~21% of our revenue, respectively. For each of the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, among our 10 largest Active Customer Accounts we had ~~four and~~ three Variable Customer Accounts ~~in each period~~ representing 8% ~~and 10%~~ of our ~~revenue, respectively.~~revenue. For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, our Base Revenue was ~~$92.0~~$135.0 million and ~~$64.1~~$87.6 million, respectively. We incurred a net loss of ~~$23.5~~$24.0 million and ~~$11.3~~$7.1 million, for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. See the section titled “—Key Business Metrics—Base Revenue” below for a discussion of Base Revenue. As we previously disclosed, revenue from Uber, our largest Base Customer Account, decreased on a sequential basis in the last three quarters. This was due to a combination of product usage decreases and certain price adjustments that were made by us as a result of Uber’s high volume growth. Accordingly, we expect the year-over-year decline in our revenue from Uber to continue to negatively impact our revenue growth rates and our Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate for upcoming periods.

Key Business Metrics

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
Number of Active Customer Accounts (as of period end date)	46,489			34,457
Number of Active Customer Accounts (as of end date of period)							57,350			43,431
Base Revenue (in thousands)	$	91,965		$	64,099		$	135,004		$	87,583
Base Revenue Growth Rate	43		%	75		%	54		%	55		%
Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate	122		%	155		%	137		%	131		%

Number of Active Customer Accounts. We believe that the number of our Active Customer Accounts is an important indicator of the growth of our business, the market acceptance of our platform and future revenue trends. We define an Active Customer Account at the end of any period as an individual account, as identified by a unique account identifier, for which we have recognized at least $5 of revenue in the last month of the period. We believe that the use of our platform by our customers at or above the $5 per month threshold is a stronger indicator of potential future engagement than trial usage of our platform or usage at levels below $5 per month. A single organization may constitute multiple unique Active Customer Accounts if it has multiple account identifiers, each of which is treated as a separate Active Customer Account.

In the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, revenue from Active Customer Accounts represented over 99% of total revenue in each period.

Base Revenue. We monitor Base Revenue as one of the more reliable indicators of future revenue trends. Base Revenue consists of all revenue other than revenue from large Active Customer Accounts that have never entered into 12-month minimum revenue commitment contracts with us, which we refer to as Variable Customer Accounts. While almost all of our customer accounts exhibit some level of variability in the usage of our products, based on our experience, we believe that Variable Customer Accounts are more likely to have significant fluctuations in usage of our products from period to period, and therefore that revenue from Variable Customer Accounts may also fluctuate significantly from period to period. This behavior is best evidenced by the decision of such customers not to enter into contracts with us that contain minimum revenue commitments, even though they may spend significant amounts on the use of our products and they may be foregoing more favorable terms often available to customers that enter into committed contracts with us. This variability adversely affects our ability to rely upon revenue from Variable Customer Accounts when analyzing expected trends in future revenue.

For historical periods through March 31, 2016, we defined a Variable Customer Account as an Active Customer Account that (i) had never signed a minimum revenue commitment contract with us for a term of at least 12 months and (ii) had met or exceeded 1% of our revenue in any quarter in the periods presented through March 31, 2016. To allow for consistent period-to-period comparisons, in the event a customer account qualified as a Variable Customer Account as of March 31, 2016, or a previously Variable Customer Account ceased to be an Active Customer Account as of such date, we included such customer account as a Variable Customer Account in all periods presented. For reporting periods starting with the three months ended June 30, 2016, we define a Variable Customer Account as a customer account that (a) has been categorized as a Variable Customer Account in any prior quarter, as well as (b) any new customer account that (i) is with a customer that has never signed a minimum revenue commitment contract with us for a term of at least 12 months and (ii) meets or exceeds 1% of our revenue in a quarter. Once a customer account is deemed to be a Variable Customer Account in any period, it remains a Variable Customer Account in subsequent periods unless such customer enters into a minimum revenue commitment contract with us for a term of at least 12 months.

In each of the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, we had six ~~and eight~~ Variable Customer Accounts, which represented 9% ~~and 10%, respectively,~~ of our total revenue.

Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate. Our ability to drive growth and generate incremental revenue depends, in part, on our ability to maintain and grow our relationships with existing Active Customer Accounts and to increase their use of the platform. An important way in which we track our performance in this area is by measuring the Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate for our Active Customer Accounts, other than our Variable Customer Accounts. Our Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate increases when such Active Customer Accounts increase usage of a product, extend usage of a product to new applications or adopt a new product. Our Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate decreases when such Active Customer Accounts cease or reduce usage of a product or when we lower usage prices on a product. As our customers grow their businesses and extend the use of our platform, they sometimes create multiple customer accounts with us for operational or other reasons. As such, for reporting periods starting with the three months ended December 31, 2016, when we identify a significant customer organization (defined as a single customer organization generating more than 1% of our revenue in a quarterly reporting period) that has created a new Active Customer Account, this new Active Customer Account is tied to, and revenue from this new Active Customer Account is included with, the original Active Customer Account for the purposes of calculating this metric. We believe measuring our Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate on revenue generated from our Active Customer Accounts, other than our Variable Customer Accounts, provides a more meaningful indication of the performance of our efforts to increase revenue from existing customers.

Our Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate compares the revenue from Active Customer Accounts, other than Variable Customer Accounts, in a quarter to the same quarter in the prior year. To calculate the Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate, we first identify the cohort of Active Customer Accounts, other than Variable Customer Accounts, that were Active Customer Accounts in the same quarter of the prior year. The Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate is the quotient obtained by dividing the revenue generated from that cohort in a quarter, by the revenue generated from that same cohort in the corresponding quarter in the prior year. When we calculate Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate for periods longer than one quarter, we use the average of the applicable quarterly Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rates for each of the quarters in such period.

Key Components of Statements of Operations

Revenue. We derive our revenue primarily from usage-based fees earned from customers using the software products within our Engagement Cloud and Programmable Communications Cloud. These usage-based software products include ~~our~~offerings, such as Programmable Voice, Programmable Messaging and Programmable ~~Video products.~~Video. Some examples of the usage-based fees for which we charge include minutes of call duration activity for our Programmable Voice products, number of text messages sent or received using our Programmable Messaging products and number of authentications for our ~~Programmable Authentication product.~~Account Security products. In the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, we generated ~~82%~~84% and 83% of our revenue, respectively, from usage-based fees. We also earn monthly flat fees from certain fee-based products, such as telephone numbers, short codes and customer support.

Customers typically pay ~~up-front~~upfront via credit card in monthly prepaid amounts and draw down their balances as they purchase or use our products. As customers grow their usage of our products they automatically receive tiered usage discounts. Our larger customers often enter into contracts, for at least 12 months, ~~which~~that contain minimum revenue commitments, which may contain more favorable pricing. Customers on such contracts typically are invoiced monthly in arrears for products used.

Amounts that have been charged via credit card or invoiced are recorded in accounts receivable and in revenue, or deferred revenue or customer deposits, depending on whether the revenue recognition criteria have been met. Given that our credit card prepayment amounts tend to be approximately equal to our credit card consumption amounts in each period, and that we do not have many invoiced customers on pre-payment contract terms, our deferred revenue at any particular time is not a meaningful indicator of future revenue.

We define U.S. revenue as revenue from customers with IP addresses at the time of registration in the United States, and we define international revenue as revenue from customers with IP addresses at the time of registration outside of the United States.

Cost of Revenue and Gross Margin. Cost of revenue consists primarily of fees paid to network service providers. Cost of revenue also includes cloud infrastructure fees, personnel costs, such as salaries and stock-based compensation for our customer support employees, and non-personnel costs, such as amortization of capitalized ~~internal-use~~internal use software development costs. Our arrangements with network service providers require us to pay fees based on the volume of phone calls initiated or text messages sent, as well as the number of telephone numbers acquired by us to service our customers. Our arrangements with our cloud infrastructure provider require us to pay fees based on our server capacity consumption.

Our gross margin has been and will continue to be affected by a number of factors, including the timing and extent of our investments in our operations, ~~our ability to manage~~increases or decreases in our network service provider and cloud infrastructure-related fees, the mix of U.S. ~~revenue~~usage compared to international ~~revenue,~~usage, exchange rate fluctuations related to network service provider fees denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the mix of products that are less dependent on the traditional network service provider networks, the timing of amortization of capitalized software development costs, and the extent to which we periodically choose to pass on our cost savings from platform optimization efforts to our customers in the form of lower usage prices.

Operating Expenses. The most significant components of operating expenses are personnel costs, which consist of salaries, benefits, ad-hoc bonuses, stock-based compensation and compensation expenses related to stock repurchases from employees. We also incur other non-personnel costs related to our general overhead expenses. We expect that our operating costs will increase in absolute dollars.

Research and Development. Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel costs, outsourced engineering services, cloud infrastructure fees for staging and development, amortization of capitalized ~~internal-use~~internal use software development costs and an allocation of our general overhead expenses. We capitalize the portion of our software development costs that meets the criteria for capitalization.

We continue to focus our research and development efforts on adding new features and products, including new use cases, improving our platform and increasing the functionality of our existing products.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel costs, including commissions for our sales employees. Sales and marketing expenses also include expenditures related to advertising, marketing, our brand awareness activities and developer evangelism, costs related to our SIGNAL developer conferences, credit card processing fees, professional services fees and an allocation of our general overhead expenses.

We focus our sales and marketing efforts on generating awareness of our company, platform and products through our developer evangelist team and self-service model, creating sales leads and establishing and promoting our brand, both domestically and internationally. We plan to continue investing in sales and marketing by increasing our sales and marketing headcount, supplementing our self-service model with an enterprise sales approach, expanding our sales channels, driving our go-to-market strategies, building our brand awareness and sponsoring additional marketing events.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs for our accounting, finance, legal, human resources and administrative support personnel and executives. General and administrative expenses also include costs related to business acquisitions, legal and other professional services fees, sales and other taxes, depreciation and amortization and an allocation of our general overhead expenses. We expect that we will incur costs associated with supporting the growth of our business and to meet the increased compliance requirements associated with both our international expansion and our transition to, and operation as, a public company.

Our general and administrative expenses include a significant amount of sales and other taxes to which we are subject based on the manner we sell and deliver our products. Prior to March 2017, we did not collect such taxes from our customers and ~~have therefore~~ recorded such taxes as general and administrative expenses. Effective March 2017, we began collecting these taxes from customers in certain jurisdictions and ~~intend~~added more jurisdictions throughout 2017 and in the first quarter of 2018 we began to collect these taxes in ~~other~~one additional jurisdiction. We continue expanding the number of jurisdictions where we will be collecting these taxes in the ~~near term.~~future. We expect that these expenses will decline in future years as we continue collecting these taxes from our ~~customers.~~customers in more jurisdictions, which would reduce our rate of ongoing accrual.

Provision for Income Taxes. Our income tax provision or benefit for interim periods is determined using an estimate of our annual effective tax rate, adjusted for discrete items occurring in the quarter. The primary difference between our effective tax rate and the federal statutory rate relates to the net operating losses in jurisdictions with a valuation allowance or a zero tax rate.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code including, but not limited to, (1) reducing the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent; (2) requiring companies to pay a one-time transition tax on certain unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries; (3) generally eliminating U.S. federal income taxes on dividends from foreign subsidiaries; (4) requiring a current inclusion in U.S. federal taxable income of certain earnings of controlled foreign corporations; (5) eliminating the corporate alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) and changing how existing AMT credits can be realized; (6) creating the base erosion anti-abuse tax (“BEAT”), a new minimum tax; (7) creating a new limitation on deductible interest expense; and (8) changing rules related to uses and limitations of net operating loss carryforwards created in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017.

We have not completed our accounting assessment for the effects of the Tax Act as of June 30, 2018; however, based on our initial assessment, we have determined that the Tax Act did not have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2018.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We use the following non-GAAP financial information, collectively, to evaluate our ongoing operations and for internal planning and forecasting purposes. We believe that non-GAAP financial information, when taken collectively, may be helpful to investors because it provides consistency and comparability with past financial performance, facilitates period-to-period comparisons of results of operations, and assists in comparisons with other companies, many of which use similar non-GAAP financial information to supplement their GAAP results. Non-GAAP financial information is presented for supplemental informational purposes only, and should not be considered a substitute for financial information presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and may be different from similarly-titled non-GAAP measures used by other companies. Whenever we use a non-GAAP financial measure, a reconciliation is provided to the most closely applicable financial measure stated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Investors are encouraged to review the related GAAP financial measures and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

Non-GAAP Gross Profit and Non-GAAP Gross Margin. For the periods presented, we define non-GAAP gross profit and non-GAAP gross margin as GAAP gross profit and GAAP gross margin, respectively, adjusted to exclude stock-based compensation and amortization of acquired intangibles.

Three Months Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

(In thousands)

Reconciliation:

Gross profit

$
52,288

$
40,248

Non-GAAP adjustments:

Stock-based compensation

180

84

Amortization of acquired intangibles

1,250

70

Non-GAAP gross profit

$
53,718

$
40,402

Non-GAAP gross margin

53
%
56
%

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2018			2017
	(In thousands)
Reconciliation:
Gross profit	$	79,814		$	53,537
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Stock-based compensation	266			142
Amortization of acquired intangibles	1,125			1,182
Non-GAAP gross profit	$	81,205		$	54,861
Non-GAAP gross margin	55		%	57		%

Non-GAAP Operating Expenses. For the periods presented, we define non-GAAP operating expenses (including categories of operating expenses) as GAAP operating expenses (and categories of operating expenses) adjusted to exclude, as applicable, stock-based compensation, amortization of acquired intangibles, acquisition-related expenses, release of tax liability upon obligation settlement and payroll taxes related to stock-based compensation.

Three Months Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

(In thousands)

Reconciliation:

Operating expenses

$
76,319

$
51,524

Non-GAAP adjustments:

Stock-based compensation

(14,008
)
(7,564
)
Amortization of acquired intangibles

(265
)
(66
)
Acquisition related expenses

(35
)
(137
)
Payroll taxes related to stock-based compensation

(595
)
—

Non-GAAP operating expenses

$
61,416

$
43,757

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2018			2017
	(In thousands)
Reconciliation:
Operating expenses	$	101,772		$	60,607
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Stock-based compensation	(20,740		)	(12,258		)
Amortization of acquired intangibles	(226		)	(260		)
Acquisition-related expenses	—			(58		)
Release of tax liability upon obligation settlement	—			12,161
Payroll taxes related to stock-based compensation	(1,811		)	(604		)
Non-GAAP operating expenses	$	78,995		$	59,588

Non-GAAP ~~Loss~~Income (Loss) from Operations and Non-GAAP Operating Margin. For the periods presented, we define non-GAAP ~~loss~~income (loss) from operations and non-GAAP operating margin as GAAP loss from operations and GAAP operating margin, respectively, adjusted to exclude stock-based compensation, amortization of acquired intangibles, acquisition-related expenses, release of tax liability upon obligation settlement and payroll taxes related to stock-based compensation.

Three Months Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

(In thousands)

Reconciliation:

Loss from operations

$
(24,031
)
$
(11,276
)
Non-GAAP adjustments:

Stock-based compensation

14,188

7,648

Amortization of acquired intangibles

1,515

136

Acquisition related expenses

35

137

Payroll taxes related to stock-based compensation

595

—

Non-GAAP loss from operations

$
(7,698
)
$
(3,355
)
Non-GAAP operating margin

(8
)%
(5
)%

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2018			2017
	(In thousands)
Reconciliation:
Loss from operations	$	(21,958	)	$	(7,070	)
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Stock-based compensation	21,006			12,400
Amortization of acquired intangibles	1,351			1,442
Acquisition-related expenses	—			58
Release of tax liability upon obligation settlement	—			(12,161		)
Payroll taxes related to stock-based compensation	1,811			604
Non-GAAP income (loss) from operations	$	2,210		$	(4,727	)
Non-GAAP operating margin	1		%	(5		)%

Results of Operations

The following tables set forth our results of operations for the periods presented and as a percentage of our total revenue for those periods. The period-to-period comparison of our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in the future.

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenue	$	100,542		$	71,533		$	283,784		$	195,383		$	147,754		$	95,870		$	276,870		$	183,242
Cost of revenue(1) (2)	48,254			31,285			127,873			86,315			67,940			42,333			127,522			79,619
Gross profit	52,288			40,248			155,911			109,068			79,814			53,537			149,348			103,623
Operating expenses:
Research and development(1) (2)	31,674			21,106			87,910			53,339			39,811			29,714			77,387			56,236
Sales and marketing(1) (2)	25,778			15,873			73,047			47,451			37,749			26,153			70,571			47,269
General and administrative(1) (2)	18,867			14,545			40,810			36,773			24,212			4,740			47,605			21,943
Total operating expenses	76,319			51,524			201,767			137,563			101,772			60,607			195,563			125,448
Loss from operations	(24,031		)	(11,276		)	(45,856		)	(28,495		)	(21,958		)	(7,070		)	(46,215		)	(21,825		)
Other income, net	1,000			138			1,969			92
Other income (expenses), net													(1,898		)	471			(1,233		)	969
Loss before provision for income taxes	(23,031		)	(11,138		)	(43,887		)	(28,403		)	(23,856		)	(6,599		)	(47,448		)	(20,856		)
Provision for income taxes	(422		)	(116		)	(902		)	(313		)	(150		)	(510		)	(287		)	(480		)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(23,453	)	$	(11,254	)	$	(44,789	)	$	(28,716	)	$	(24,006	)	$	(7,109	)	$	(47,735	)	$	(21,336	)

(1) Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows:

Three Months
Ended
September 30,

Nine Months
Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

(In thousands)

Cost of revenue

$
180

$
84

$
460

$
135

Research and development

6,493

3,741

16,687

7,636

Sales and marketing

2,603

1,432

6,961

3,282

General and administrative

4,912

2,391

11,865

4,596

Total

$
14,188

$
7,648

$
35,973

$
15,649

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Cost of revenue	$	266	$	142	$	488	$	280
Research and development	9,749		5,710		17,621		10,194
Sales and marketing	5,049		2,363		8,908		4,358
General and administrative	5,942		4,185		11,529		6,953
Total	$	21,006	$	12,400	$	38,546	$	21,785

(2) Includes amortization of acquired ~~intangible assets~~intangibles as follows:

Three Months
Ended
September 30,

Nine Months
Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

(In thousands)

Cost of revenue

$
1,250

$
70

$
3,429

$
210

Research and development

25

38

101

114

Sales and marketing

220

—

539

—

General and administrative

20

28

64

83

Total

$
1,515

$
136

$
4,133

$
407

Three Months
Ended
September 30,

Nine Months
Ended
September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Consolidated Statements of Operations, as a percentage of revenue:**

Revenue

100
%
100
%
100
%
100
%
Cost of revenue

48

44

45

44

Gross profit

52

56

55

56

Operating expenses:

Research and development

32

30

31

27

Sales and marketing

26

22

26

24

General and administrative

19

20

14

19

Total operating expenses

76

72

71

70

Loss from operations

(24
)
(16
)
(16
)
(15
)
Other income, net

1

*

1

*

Loss before provision for income taxes

(23
)
(16
)
(15
)
(15
)
Provision for income taxes

*

*

*

*

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

(23
)%
(16
)%
(15
)%
(15
)%

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Cost of revenue	$	1,125	$	1,182	$	2,323	$	2,179
Research and development	—		38		22		76
Sales and marketing	206		202		426		319
General and administrative	20		20		40		44
Total	$	1,351	$	1,442	$	2,811	$	2,618

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018		2017		2018		2017
Consolidated Statements of Operations, as a percentage of revenue:**
Revenue	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%
Cost of revenue	46		44		46		43
Gross profit	54		56		54		57
Operating expenses:
Research and development	27		31		28		31
Sales and marketing	26		27		25		26
General and administrative	16		5		17		12
Total operating expenses	69		63		71		68
Loss from operations	(15	)	(7	)	(17	)	(12	)
Other income (expenses), net	(1	)	*		*		*
Loss before provision for income taxes	(16	)	(7	)	(17	)	(12	)
Provision for income taxes	*		(1	)	*		*
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	(16	)%	(8	)%	(17	)%	(12	)%

* Less than 0.5% of revenue.

** Columns may not add up to 100% due to rounding.

Comparison of the Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017

Revenue

	Three Months Ended September 30,								Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		Change				2018		2017		Change
	(Dollars in thousands)								(Dollars in thousands)
Base Revenue	$	91,965	$	64,099	$	27,866	43	%	$	135,004	$	87,583	$	47,421	54	%
Variable Revenue	8,577		7,434		1,143		15	%	12,750		8,287		4,463		54	%
Total revenue	$	100,542	$	71,533	$	29,009	41	%	$	147,754	$	95,870	$	51,884	54	%

In the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, Base Revenue increased by ~~$27.9~~$47.4 million, or ~~43%~~54%, compared to the same period last year, and represented 91% ~~and 90%~~ of total revenue in both the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016, respectively.~~2017. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the usage of ~~all~~ our products, particularly our Programmable Messaging products and Programmable Voice products, and the adoption of additional products by our existing customers. This increase was partially offset by pricing decreases that we have implemented over time ~~for our customers~~ in the form of lower usage prices, in an effort to increase the reach and scale of our platform. The changes in usage and price in the three months ended June 30, 2018 were reflected in our Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate of ~~122% for the three months ended September 30, 2017.~~137%. The increase in usage was also attributable to a ~~35%~~32% increase in the number of Active Customer Accounts, from ~~34,457~~43,431 as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017, to ~~46,489~~57,350 as of ~~September~~June 30, 2017. As we previously disclosed, revenue from Uber, our largest Base Customer Account, decreased this quarter. This was due to a combination of product usage decreases and certain price adjustments that were made by us as a result of Uber’s high volume growth. Accordingly, we expect the year-over-year decline in our revenue from Uber to continue to negatively impact our revenue growth rates and our Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate for upcoming periods.2018.

In the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, Variable Revenue increased by ~~$1.1~~$4.5 million, or ~~15%~~54%, compared to the same period last year, and represented 9% ~~and 10%~~ of total revenue in both the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016, respectively.~~2017. This increase was primarily attributable to the ~~fluctuating nature~~increase in the usage of products by our existing Variable Customer Accounts. ~~As these customers increase or decrease their usage of our products, Variable Revenue also varies from period to period.~~

U.S. revenue and international revenue represented ~~$76.7~~$111.2 million, or ~~76%~~75%, and ~~$23.8~~$36.5 million, or ~~24%~~25%, respectively, of total revenue in the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$60.5~~$75.1 million, or ~~85%~~78%, and ~~$11.0~~$20.8 million, or ~~15%~~22%, respectively, of total revenue in the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016. This~~2017. The increase in international revenue iswas attributable to the growth in usage of our products, particularly our Programmable Messaging products and Programmable Voice products, by our existing international Active Customer ~~Accounts;~~Accounts, and a ~~41%~~38% increase in the number of international Active Customer Accounts ~~excluding the recent acquisition,~~ driven in part by our focus on expanding our sales to customers outside of the United ~~States; and our recent acquisition. We opened two offices outside of the United States between September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2017.~~States.

Cost of Revenue and Gross Margin

	Three Months Ended September 30,										Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			Change				2018			2017			Change
	(Dollars in thousands)										(Dollars in thousands)
Cost of revenue	$	48,254		$	31,285		$	16,969	54	%	$	67,940		$	42,333		$	25,607	60	%
Gross margin	52		%	56		%					54		%	56		%

In the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, cost of revenue increased by ~~$17.0~~$25.6 million, or ~~54%~~60%, compared to the same period last year. The increase in cost of revenue was primarily attributable to a ~~$14.0~~$22.9 million increase in network service providers’ ~~fees,~~costs and a ~~$1.2~~$1.8 million increase in cloud infrastructure fees both to support the growth in usage of our ~~products~~products.

In the three months ended June 30, 2018, gross margin percentage declined primarily as a result of higher network service provider costs related to foreign currency fluctuations, certain downward price adjustments that were made by us in 2017 as a result of the high volume growth of a large customer, an increasing mix of international product usage and ~~a $1.6 million~~an increase in ~~amortization expense related to our internal-use software and acquired intangible assets.~~network service provider fees in certain geographies, which was partially offset by product mix.

Operating Expenses

	Three Months Ended September 30,								Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		Change				2018		2017		Change
	(Dollars in thousands)								(Dollars in thousands)
Research and development	$	31,674	$	21,106	$	10,568	50	%	$	39,811	$	29,714	$	10,097	34	%
Sales and marketing	25,778		15,873		9,905		62	%	37,749		26,153		11,596		44	%
General and administrative	18,867		14,545		4,322		30	%	24,212		4,740		19,472		411	%
Total operating expenses	$	76,319	$	51,524	$	24,795	48	%	$	101,772	$	60,607	$	41,165	68	%

In the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, research and development expenses increased by ~~$10.6~~$10.1 million, or ~~50%~~34%, compared to the same period last year. The increase was primarily attributable to ~~an $8.0~~a $7.4 million increase in personnel costs, net of a ~~$2.1~~$1.3 million increase in capitalized software development costs, largely as a result of a ~~44%~~12% average increase in our research and development headcount, ~~due~~as we continued to ~~our continued~~ focus on enhancing our existing products and introducing new products, as well as enhancing product ~~development~~management and ~~enhancement.~~other technical functions. The increase was also due ~~in part~~ to a ~~$0.5 million increase in outsourced engineering services, a $0.5~~$0.9 million increase in cloud infrastructure fees to support the staging and development of our products, a ~~$0.5~~$0.3 million increase in ~~depreciation and amortization expenses~~professional services fees, a $0.2 million increase in outsourced engineering services and a $0.2 million increase in ~~other professional fees.~~amortization expense.

In the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, sales and marketing expenses increased by ~~$9.9~~$11.6 million, or ~~62%~~44%, compared to the same period last year. The increase was primarily attributable to a ~~$6.6~~$11.0 million increase in personnel costs, largely as a result of a ~~45%~~44% average increase in sales and marketing headcount as we continued to expand our sales efforts in the United States and internationally, a $0.6 million increase in marketing and advertising costs, a $0.5 million increase in credit card processing fees due to increased volume, a $0.4 million increase in depreciation and amortization, a $0.4 million increase in employee travel, a $0.3 million increase related to our brand awareness programs and events and a $0.2 million increase in professional fees.internationally.

In the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, general and administrative expenses increased by ~~$4.3~~$19.5 million, or ~~30%~~411%, compared to the same period last year. The increase was primarily attributable to the $12.2 million release of tax liability upon certain obligation settlements and estimate revisions that occurred in the three months ended June 30, 2017, and did not reoccur in the same period in 2018. The remaining increase was primarily attributable to a ~~$3.8~~$3.5 million increase in personnel costs, largely as a result of a ~~28%~~29% average increase in general and administrative headcount to support the growth of our business ~~a $0.5 million increase in depreciation expense~~domestically and internationally and a ~~$1.0~~$1.3 million increase in professional services ~~fees. These increases were~~fees primarily related to our operations as a public company and our on-going litigation matters.

Other Income (Expenses), net

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	2018			2017		Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Other income (expenses), net	$	(1,898	)	$	471	$	(2,369	)	(503	)%

In the three months ended June 30, 2018, net other income (expenses) decreased by $2.4 million, or 503%, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to $2.7 million amortization of debt discount and issuance costs related to our 0.25% convertible senior notes due 2023 (the “Notes”) issued in May 2018, partially offset by ~~a $1.3 million decrease~~net gains in ~~sales and other taxes as we settled~~foreign currencies due to their fluctuation relative to the ~~outstanding liabilities in certain jurisdictions and a $0.1 million decrease in business acquisition related costs.~~U.S. dollar.

Comparison of the ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017

Revenue

	Nine Months Ended September 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		Change					2018		2017		Change
	(Dollars in thousands)									(Dollars in thousands)
Base Revenue	$	260,191	$	170,303	$	89,888		53	%	$	252,511	$	168,226	$	84,285	50	%
Variable Revenue	23,593		25,080		(1,487		)	(6	)%	24,359		15,016		9,343		62	%
Total revenue	$	283,784	$	195,383	$	88,401		45	%	$	276,870	$	183,242	$	93,628	51	%

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, Base Revenue increased by ~~$89.9~~$84.3 million, or ~~53%~~50%, compared to the same period last year, and represented ~~92%~~91% and ~~87%~~92% of total revenue in the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in the usage of ~~all~~ our products, particularly our Programmable Messaging products and Programmable Voice products, and the adoption of additional products by our existing customers. This increase was partially offset by pricing decreases that we have implemented over time ~~for our customers~~ in the form of lower usage prices, in an effort to increase the reach and scale of our platform. The changes in usage and price in the six months ended June 30, 2018 were reflected in our Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate of ~~131% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.~~134%. The increase in usage was also attributable to a ~~35%~~32% increase in the number of Active Customer Accounts, from ~~34,457~~43,431 as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017, to ~~46,489~~57,350 as of ~~September~~June 30, 2017. As we previously disclosed, revenue from Uber, our largest Base Customer Account, decreased in the period. This was due to a combination of product usage decreases and certain price adjustments that were made by us as a result of Uber’s high volume growth. Accordingly, we expect the year-over-year decline in our revenue from Uber to continue to negatively impact our revenue growth rates and our Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate for upcoming periods.2018.

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, Variable Revenue ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$1.5~~$9.3 million, or 6%62%, compared to the same period last year, and represented 8%9% and ~~13%~~8% of total revenue in the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, respectively. This ~~decrease~~increase was primarily attributable to the ~~fluctuating nature~~increase in the usage of products by our existing Variable Customer Accounts. ~~As these customers increase or decrease their usage of our products, Variable Revenue also varies from period to period.~~

U.S. revenue and international revenue represented ~~$221.9~~$209.9 million, or ~~78%~~76%, and ~~$61.9~~$67.0 million, or ~~22%~~24%, respectively, of total revenue in the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$165.5~~$145.2 million, or ~~85%~~79%, and ~~$29.9~~$38.0 million, or ~~15%~~21%, respectively, of total revenue in the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016. This~~2017. The increase in international revenue iswas attributable to the growth in usage of our products, particularly our Programmable Messaging products and Programmable Voice products, by our existing international Active Customer ~~Accounts;~~Accounts, and a ~~41%~~38% increase in the number of international Active Customer Accounts ~~excluding our most recent acquisition,~~ driven in part by our focus on expanding our sales to customers outside of the United ~~States; and our recent acquisition. We opened two offices outside of the United States between September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2017.~~States.

Cost of Revenue and Gross Margin

	Nine Months Ended September 30,										Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			Change				2018			2017			Change
	(Dollars in thousands)										(Dollars in thousands)
Cost of revenue	$	127,873		$	86,315		$	41,558	48	%	$	127,522		$	79,619		$	47,903	60	%
Gross margin	55		%	56		%					54		%	57		%

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, cost of revenue increased by ~~$41.6~~$47.9 million, or ~~48%~~60%, compared to the same period last year. The increase in cost of revenue was primarily attributable to a ~~$33.1~~$43.1 million increase in network service providers’ ~~fees,~~costs and a ~~$3.5~~$3.1 million increase in cloud infrastructure fees both to support the growth in usage of our ~~products~~products.

In the six months ended June 30, 2018, gross margin percentage declined primarily as a result of higher network service provider costs related to foreign currency fluctuations, certain price adjustments that were made by us in 2017 as a result of the high volume growth of a large customer, an increasing mix of international product usage, and ~~a $4.3 million~~an increase in ~~amortization expense related to our internal-use software and acquired intangible assets.~~network service provider fees in certain geographies, an increase in network service provider fees in certain geographies, which was partially offset by product mix.

Operating Expenses

	Nine Months Ended September 30,								Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		Change				2018		2017		Change
	(Dollars in thousands)								(Dollars in thousands)
Research and development	$	87,910	$	53,339	$	34,571	65	%	$	77,387	$	56,236	$	21,151	38	%
Sales and marketing	73,047		47,451		25,596		54	%	70,571		47,269		23,302		49	%
General and administrative	40,810		36,773		4,037		11	%	47,605		21,943		25,662		117	%
Total operating expenses	$	201,767	$	137,563	$	64,204	47	%	$	195,563	$	125,448	$	70,115	56	%

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, research and development expenses increased by ~~$34.6~~$21.2 million, or ~~65%~~38%, compared to the same period last year. The increase was primarily attributable to a ~~$25.6~~$15.5 million increase in personnel costs, net of a ~~$5.7~~$3.1 million increase in capitalized software development costs, largely as a result of ~~a 45%~~an 18% average increase in our research and development headcount, ~~due~~as we continued to ~~our continued~~ focus on enhancing our existing products and introducing new products, as well as enhancing product ~~development~~management and ~~enhancement.~~other technical functions. The increase was also due ~~in part~~ to a ~~$1.9~~$1.7 million increase in cloud infrastructure fees to support the staging and development of our products, a ~~$1.7~~$0.8 million increase in ~~depreciation and~~ amortization expense, a ~~$1.4~~$0.5 million increase ~~related to software licenses,~~in professional services fees and a ~~$1.3~~$0.5 million increase in outsourced engineering ~~services and a $0.6 million increase in other professional fees.~~services.

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, sales and marketing expenses increased by ~~$25.6~~$23.3 million, or ~~54%~~49%, compared to the same period last year. The increase was primarily attributable to a ~~$17.8~~$20.8 million increase in personnel costs, largely as a result of a ~~40%~~48% average increase in sales and marketing headcount as we continued to expand our sales efforts in the United States and internationally and a ~~$1.5~~$1.6 million increase in ~~advertising costs, a $1.4 million increase in credit card processing fees due to increased volume, a $0.9 million increase in depreciation and amortization, a $0.7 million increase~~the expenses related to ~~software licenses, a $0.6 million increase in employee travel, a $0.6 million increase in professional fees and a $0.5 million increase related to our SIGNAL conference.~~brand awareness programs.

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, general and administrative expenses increased by ~~$4.0~~$25.7 million, or ~~11%~~117%, compared to the same period last year. The increase was primarily attributable to the $13.1 million release of tax liability upon certain obligation settlements and estimate revisions that occurred in the six months ended June 30, 2017, and did not reoccur in the same period in 2018. The remaining increase was primarily attributable to a ~~$11.9~~$7.5 million increase in personnel costs, largely as a result of a ~~28%~~38% average increase in ~~the~~general and administrative headcount to support the growth of our business domestically and internationally and a ~~$3.6~~$2.7 million increase in professional services fees primarily related to our operations as a public company and our on-going litigation ~~matters, a $2.1~~matters.

Other Income (Expenses), net

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018			2017		Change
	(Dollars in thousands)
Other income (expenses), net	$	(1,233	)	$	969	$	(2,202	)	(227	)%

In the six months ended June 30, 2018, net other income (expenses) decreased by $2.2 million, ~~increase in facilities~~or 227%, compared to the same period last year, primarily due to $2.7 million amortization of debt discount and ~~related expenses, a $0.5 million increase~~issuance costs related to ~~software licenses and a $0.2 million increase~~our 0.25% convertible senior notes due 2023 (the “Notes”) issued in ~~business acquisition costs. These increases were~~May 2018, partially offset by net gains in foreign currencies due to their fluctuation relative to the release of $13.1 million tax liability upon certain obligation settlements and estimate revisions, discussed in detail in Note 10 (d) of the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and a $1.7 million decrease in state and other taxes as we began collecting those in certain jurisdictions starting in the second quarter of 2017.U.S. dollar.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

To date, our principal sources of liquidity have been (i) the net proceeds of $155.5 million and $64.4 million, ~~after deducting~~net of underwriting discounts and offering expenses, ~~paid by us,~~ from our initial public offering in June 2016 and our follow-on public offering in October 2016, respectively; (ii) the net proceeds we received through private sales of equity ~~securities,~~securities; (iii) the net proceeds of approximately $537.0 million, after deducting initial purchaser discounts and debt issuance costs paid or payable by us, from issuance of the Notes, as ~~well as~~described in Note 8 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statement included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q; and (iv) the payments received from customers using our products. From our inception through March 31, 2016, we completed several rounds of equity financing through the sale of our convertible preferred stock for total net proceeds of $237.1 million.

We believe that our cash, ~~and~~ cash equivalents ~~balances, our~~and marketable securities ~~portfolio and~~balances, as well as the cash flows generated by our operations will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months. However, our belief may prove to be incorrect, and we could utilize our available financial resources sooner than we currently expect. Our future capital requirements and the adequacy of available funds will depend on many factors, including those set forth in ~~the section titled~~Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” We may be required to seek additional equity or debt financing in order to meet these future capital requirements. In the event that additional financing is required from outside sources, we may not be able to raise it on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we are unable to raise additional capital when desired, our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.

Cash Flows

The following table summarizes our cash flows for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Nine Months
Ended September 30,

2017

2016

Cash provided by (used in) operating activities

$
(7,054
)
$
4,419

Cash used in investing activities

(235,795
)
(21,814
)
Cash provided by financing activities

29,002

160,785

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

88

—

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

$
(213,759
)
$
143,390

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018			2017
				(As Adjusted)
Cash provided (used) by operating activities	$	19,225		$	(4,049	)
Cash used in investing activities	(138,117		)	(235,461		)
Cash provided by financing activities	496,301			24,817
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	818			42
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	378,227		$	(214,651	)

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, cash ~~used in~~provided by operating activities consisted primarily of our net loss of ~~$44.8~~$47.7 million adjusted for non-cash items, including ~~$36.0~~$38.5 million of stock-based compensation expense, ~~$13.4~~$11.4 million of depreciation and amortization expense, $2.7 million of amortization of the debt discount and ~~$12.0~~issuance costs related to our Notes and $12.1 million of cumulative changes in operating assets and liabilities. With respect to changes in operating assets and liabilities, accounts payable and other current liabilities ~~remained unchanged and deferred revenue~~ increased ~~$3.4~~$40.6 million primarily due to increases in transaction ~~volumes which were partially offset~~volumes. Deferred revenue decreased $4.5 million primarily due to a $7.8 million reclassification of customer deposits caused by the ~~$13.1 million release~~implementation of ~~tax liability upon certain obligation settlements and estimate revisions, discussed in detail~~the new accounting guidance for revenue, as described in Note ~~10 (d) of the~~2 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this ~~quarterly report~~Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This decrease in deferred revenue was partially offset by increases due to transaction volumes and timing of customer prepayments. Accounts receivable and prepaid expenses increased ~~$14.2~~$28.9 million, which resulted primarily from the timing of cash receipts from certain of our larger customers, pre-payments for cloud infrastructure fees and certain operating expenses.

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, cash ~~provided by~~used in operating activities consisted primarily of our net loss of ~~$28.7~~$21.3 million adjusted for non-cash items, including ~~$15.6~~$21.8 million of stock-based compensation expense, ~~$5.3~~$8.5 million of depreciation and amortization expense and ~~$11.0~~$13.2 million of cumulative changes in operating assets and liabilities. With respect to changes in operating assets and liabilities, accounts payable and other liabilities ~~increased $20.9~~decreased $7.6 million and deferred revenue increased ~~$3.3~~$2.4 million, primarily due to a $13.1 million release of tax liability upon certain obligation settlements and estimate revisions, partially offset by increases in transaction volumes and additional accruals of sales and other taxes. Other long-term liabilities increased $9.6 million, primarily due to the $9.5 million increase in the deferred rent related to our new office lease in San Francisco, California. These increases were partially offset by an increase in accountsAccounts receivable and prepaid expenses ~~of $22.8~~increased $7.3 million, which resulted primarily from ~~the growth of our business,~~ the timing of cash receipts from certain of our larger customers, pre-payments for cloud infrastructure fees and certain operating ~~expenses and an $8.0 million increase related to the tenant improvement allowance under our new San Francisco, California office lease.~~expenses.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2018, cash used in investing activities was $138.1 million primarily consisting of $125.8 million of purchases of marketable securities, net of maturities, and $10.0 million related to capitalized software development costs.

In the six months ended June 30, 2017, cash used in investing activities was ~~$235.8~~$235.5 million, primarily consisting of ~~$193.2~~$197.9 million of purchases of marketable securities, net of maturities, a $22.6 million payment for a business acquisition, net of cash acquired, ~~an $12.3~~$8.0 million related to capitalized software development costs and a ~~$8.6 million increase in purchases of capital assets primarily related to the leasehold improvements under our new office lease.~~

In the nine months ended September 30, 2016, cash used in investing activities was $21.8 million, primarily consisting of a $7.4 million increase in restricted cash mainly to secure our new San Francisco, California office lease, $8.4 million of payments for capitalized software development as we continued to build new products and enhance our existing products, and a $5.3$6.8 million increase in purchases of capital assets primarily related to the leasehold improvements under our new office lease.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2018, cash provided by financing activities was $496.3 million primarily consisting of $537.5 million net proceeds from our Notes, net of initial purchaser discounts and issuance costs paid in the period, $13.7 million proceeds from stock options exercised by our employees and $4.5 million proceeds from shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan. This was partially offset by a $58.5 million payment for capped call transactions.

In the six months ended June 30, 2017, cash provided by financing activities was ~~$29.0~~$24.8 million, primarily consisting of ~~$22.5~~$18.2 million proceeds from stock options exercises by our employees and $7.4 million proceeds from shares issued under our employee stock purchase plan.

In the nine months ended September 30, 2016, cash provided by financing activities was $160.8 million, primarily consisting of $160.4 million of proceeds raised in our initial public offering, net of underwriting discounts, and $4.8 million of proceeds from stock options exercises by our employees. These cash inflows were partially offset by $3.9 million of costs paid in connection with our initial public offering.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and related disclosures. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our estimates are based on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.

We believe that the assumptions and estimates associated with revenue recognition, ~~stock-based compensation, the valuation~~capitalization of ~~goodwill and intangible assets,~~our internal-use software development costs and accruals and ~~legal~~ contingencies have the greatest potential impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements. Therefore, we consider these to be our critical accounting policies and estimates.

Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, which replaced the existing revenue recognition guidance, ASC 605, and outlines a single set of comprehensive principles for recognizing revenue under U.S. GAAP. Among other things, ASC 606 requires entities to assess the products or services promised in contracts with customers at contract inception to determine the appropriate unit at which to record revenue, which is referred to as a performance obligation. Revenue is recognized when control of the promised products or services is transferred to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those products or services.

We adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method with cumulative catch-up adjustment to the opening retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. Results for reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2017 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historical accounting policies prior to adoption. In adopting the standard, we elected to apply the new guidance only to those contracts which were not completed as of the date of the adoption.

The impact of adopting the new standard on our consolidated financial statements was insignificant. We recorded a net cumulative catch-up adjustment to the beginning retained earnings as of January 1, 2018, of $0.7 million.

The primary impact relates to the deferral of incremental commission costs of obtaining new contracts. Under ASC 605, we deferred only direct and incremental commission costs to obtain a contract and amortized those costs on a straight-line basis over the term of the related subscription contract. Under the new standard, we defer all incremental commission costs to obtain the contract and amortize these costs on a straight-line basis over the term of benefit of the underlying asset, which was determined to be five years.

The impact on our revenue recognition policies was insignificant. Prior to the adoption of ASC 606, we recognized the majority of our revenue according to the usage by our customers in the period in which that usage occurred. ASC 606 continues to support the recognition of revenue over time, and on a usage basis, for the majority of our contracts due to continuous transfer of control to the customer. The impact on the Company’s balance sheet presentation includes presenting customer refundable prepayments as customer deposit liabilities, whereas under ASC 605 these were included in deferred revenues.

There was not a significant tax impact to our consolidated statements of operations and consolidated balance sheet relating to the adoption of the new standard as there is a full valuation allowance due to our history of continued losses.

Other than adoption of ASC 606, there have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates as compared to the critical accounting policies and estimates disclosed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance

See Note 2 of the notes to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a summary of recently issued and not yet adopted accounting pronouncements.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements and do not have any holdings in variable interest entities.

Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments

Our principal commitments consist of obligations under our operating leases for office space and contractual commitments to our cloud infrastructure and network service providers. ~~There~~In the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we entered into several non-

cancellable vendor agreements with a term from one to two years for total purchase commitments of $3.3 million and $7.8 million, respectively. Except for these new commitment, there have been no material changes to our principle commitments described in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements~~

~~We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements and do not have any holdings in variable interest entities.~~

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk~~

We are exposed to certain market risks in the ordinary course of our business. These risks primarily include interest rate sensitivities as follows:

Interest Rate Risk

We had cash and cash equivalents of ~~$91.9~~$493.5 million and marketable securities of ~~$192.0~~$301.1 million as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. Cash and cash equivalents consist of bank deposits and money market funds. Marketable securities consist of U.S. treasury securities and high credit quality corporate debt securities. The cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities are held for working capital purposes. Such interest-earning instruments carry a degree of interest rate risk. To date, fluctuations in interest income have not been significant. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing income without significantly increasing risk. We do not enter into investments for trading or speculative purposes and have not used any derivative financial instruments to manage our interest rate risk exposure. Due to the short-term nature of our investments, we have not been exposed to, nor do we anticipate being exposed to, material risks due to changes in interest rates. A hypothetical 10% change in interest rates during any of the periods presented would not have had a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

In May 2018, we issued $550.0 million aggregate principal amount of Notes. The fair market value of the Notes is affected by our stock price. The fair value of the Notes will generally increase as our common stock price increases and will generally decrease as our common stock price declines in value. In addition, the fair market value of the Notes are exposed to interest rate risk. Generally, the fair market value of our fixed interest rate Notes will increase as interest rates fall and decrease as interest rates rise. Additionally, on our balance sheet we carry the Notes at face value less unamortized discount and debt issuance cost and we present the fair value for required disclosure purposes only.

Currency Exchange Risks

The functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries is the U.S. ~~dollar.~~dollar and the Euro. Therefore, we are exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations as we convert the financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars. The local currencies of our foreign subsidiaries are the British pound, the Euro, the Colombian peso, the Singapore dollar, the Hong Kong dollar and the Swedish Krona. Our subsidiaries remeasure monetary assets and liabilities at period-end exchange rates, while non-monetary items are remeasured at historical rates. Revenue and expense accounts are remeasured at the average exchange rate in effect during the ~~fiscal~~ year. If there is a change in foreign currency exchange rates, the conversion of our foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements into U.S. dollars would result in a realized gain or loss which is recorded in our condensed consolidated statements of operations. We do not currently engage in any hedging activity to reduce our potential exposure to currency fluctuations, although we may choose to do so in the future. A hypothetical 10% change in foreign exchange rates during any of the periods presented would not have had a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on such evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that as of ~~such date,~~June 30, 2018, our disclosure controls and procedures were ~~effective.~~not effective as a result of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to accounting for capitalized software development costs as described in Part II, Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures”, of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control

We are taking actions to remediate the material weakness relating to our internal control over financial reporting, as described in Part II, Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures”, of our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting in connection with the evaluation required by Rules ~~13a-15(d)~~13a-15 (d) and ~~15d-15(d)~~15d-15 (d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the ~~period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q~~quarter ended June 30, 2018, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our ~~chief executive officer~~Chief Executive Officer and ~~chief financial officer,~~Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On April 30, 2015, Telesign Corporation ~~or Telesign,~~(“Telesign”), filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court, Central District of California (“Telesign I”). Telesign alleges that we are infringing three U.S. patents that it holds: U.S. Patent No. 8,462,920 (“‘920”), U.S. Patent No. 8,687,038 (“‘038”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,945,034 (“‘034”). The patent infringement allegations in the lawsuit relate to our ~~Programmable Authentication~~Account Security products, our two-factor authentication use case and an API tool to find information about a phone number. We ~~have~~ petitioned the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office for inter partes review of the patents at issue. On July 8, 2016, the ~~U.S.~~ PTO denied our petition for inter partes review of the ‘920 and ‘038 ~~patents. After the U.S. PTO held its hearing on the ‘034 patent~~ ~~inter partes~~ ~~review,~~patents and on June 26, 2017, it upheld the patentability of the ‘034 ~~patent, adopting Telesign’s narrow construction of its~~ patent.

On March 28, 2016, Telesign filed a second lawsuit against us in the United States District Court, Central District of California (“Telesign II”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,300,792 (“‘792”) held by Telesign. The ‘792 patent is in the same patent family as the ‘920 and ‘038 patents asserted in Telesign I. On March 8, 2017, in response to a petition by the Company, the ~~U.S.~~ PTO issued an order instituting the inter partes review for the ‘792 patent. ~~A final written decision is expected~~On March 6, 2018, the PTO found all claims challenged by ~~March 2018.~~Twilio in the inter partes review unpatentable. On March 15, 2017, Twilio filed a motion to consolidate and stay related cases pending the conclusion of the ~~now instituted~~ ‘792 patent inter partes ~~review. On May 16, 2017,~~review, which the court ~~issued an order~~granted. The Central District of California court lifted the stay on April 13, 2018. The court transferred the cases to ~~consolidate~~ the ~~Telesign I and Telesign II matters and stay the consolidated case until the completion~~United States District Court, Northern District of ~~the~~ ~~inter partes~~ ~~review of the’792 patent.~~California. With respect to each of the patents asserted in the now-consolidated Telesign I and Telesign II cases (“TeleSign I/II”), the ~~complaints seek,~~consolidated complaint seeks, among other things, to enjoin us from allegedly infringing the patents, along with damages for lost profits. The Telesign I/II litigation is currently ongoing.

On December 1, 2016, we filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Telesign in the United States District Court, Northern District of California (“Telesign III”), alleging indirect infringement of United States Patent No. 8,306,021 (“021”), United States Patent No. 8,837,465 (“465”), United States Patent No. 8,755,376 (“376”), United States Patent No. 8,736,051 (“051”), United States Patent No. 8,737,962 (“962”), United States Patent No. 9,270,833 (“833”), and United States Patent No. ~~9,226,217.~~9,226,217 (“217”). Telesign filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on January 25, 2017. In two orders, issued on March 31, 2017 and April 17, 2017, the ~~Court~~court granted Telesign’s motion to dismiss with respect to the ‘962, ‘833, ‘051 and ‘217 patents, but denied Telesign’s motion to dismiss as to the ‘021, ‘465 and ‘376 patents. ~~This litigation~~On August 23, 2017, Telesign petitioned the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“U.S. PTO”) for inter partes review of the ‘021, ‘465, and ‘376 patents. On March 9, 2018, the PTO denied Telesign’s petition for inter partes review of the ‘021 patent and granted Telesign’s petitions for inter partes review of the ‘465 and ‘376 patents. Telesign III is currently ~~ongoing.~~stayed pending resolution of the inter partes reviews of the ‘465 and ‘376 patents. The Company is seeking a judgment of infringement, a judgment of willful infringement, monetary and injunctive relief, enhanced damages, and an award of costs and expenses against Telesign.

On February 18, 2016, a putative class action complaint was filed in the Alameda County Superior Court in California, entitled Angela Flowers v. Twilio Inc. The complaint alleges that our products permit the interception, recording and disclosure of communications at a customer’s request and are in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act. The complaint seeks injunctive relief as well as monetary damages. On May 27, 2016, we filed a demurrer to the complaint. On August 2, 2016, the court issued an order denying the demurrer in part and granted it in part, with leave to amend by August 18, 2016 to address any claims under California’s Unfair Competition Law. The plaintiff opted not to amend the complaint. ~~Discovery has already begun and~~Following a ~~hearing on~~period of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for class certification ~~motion is set~~on September 20, 2017. On January 2, 2018, the court issued an order granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff’s class certification motion. The court certified two classes of individuals who, during specified time periods, allegedly sent or received certain communications involving the accounts of three of our customers that were recorded. The court has not yet finalized a schedule for ~~December 2017.~~notice to potential class members, additional discovery, summary judgment motions, or trial.

We intend to vigorously defend ourselves against these lawsuits and believe we have meritorious defenses to each matter in which we are a defendant. However, litigation is inherently uncertain, and any judgment or injunctive relief entered against us or any adverse settlement could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In addition to the litigation discussed above, from time to time, we may be subject to legal actions and claims in the ordinary course of business. We have received, and may in the future continue to receive, claims from third parties asserting, among other things, infringement of their intellectual property rights. Future litigation may be necessary to defend ourselves, our partners and our customers by determining the scope, enforceability and validity of third-party proprietary rights, or to establish our proprietary rights. The results of any current or future litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and settlement costs, diversion of management resources, and other factors.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

A description of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business is set forth below. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including ~~the section titled~~Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The risks and uncertainties described below may not be the only ones we face. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our Class A common stock could decline.

Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry

The market for our products and platform is new and unproven, may decline or experience limited growth and is dependent in part on developers continuing to adopt our platform and use our products.

We were founded in 2008, and we have been developing and providing a cloud-based platform that enables developers and organizations to integrate voice, messaging and video communications capabilities into their software applications. This market is relatively new and unproven and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. We believe that our revenue currently constitutes a significant portion of the total revenue in this market, and therefore, we believe that our future success will depend in large part on the growth, if any, of this market. The utilization of APIs by developers and organizations to build communications functionality into their applications is still relatively new, and developers and organizations may not recognize the need for, or benefits of, our products and platform. Moreover, if they do not recognize the need for and benefits of our products and platform, they may decide to adopt alternative products and services to satisfy some portion of their business needs. In order to grow our business and extend our market position, we intend to focus on educating developers and other potential customers about the benefits of our products and platform, expanding the functionality of our products and bringing new technologies to market to increase market acceptance and use of our platform. Our ability to expand the market that our products and platform address depends upon a number of factors, including the cost, performance and perceived value associated with such products and platform. The market for our products and platform could fail to grow significantly or there could be a reduction in demand for our products as a result of a lack of developer acceptance, technological challenges, competing products and services, decreases in spending by current and prospective customers, weakening economic conditions and other causes. If our market does not experience significant growth or demand for our products decreases, then our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We have a history of losses and we are uncertain about our future profitability.

We have incurred net losses in each year since our inception, including net losses of ~~$44.8~~$47.7 million, ~~$41.3~~$63.7 million and ~~$35.5~~$41.3 million in the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2018 and in the years 2017 and ~~the years ended December 31,~~ 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of ~~$231.5~~$297.5 million as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. We expect to continue to expend substantial financial and other resources on, among other things:

· investments in our engineering team, the development of new products, features and functionality and enhancements to our platform;

· sales and marketing, including ~~expanding~~the continued expansion of our direct sales organization and marketing programs, especially for enterprises and for organizations outside of the United States, and expanding our programs directed at increasing our brand awareness among current and new developers;

· expansion of our operations and infrastructure, both domestically and internationally; and

· general administration, including legal, accounting and other expenses related to being a public company.

These investments may not result in increased revenue or growth of our business. We also expect that our revenue growth rate will decline over time. Accordingly, we may not be able to generate sufficient revenue to offset our expected cost increases and achieve and sustain profitability. If we fail to achieve and sustain profitability, then our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.

We have experienced rapid growth and expect our growth to continue, and if we fail to effectively manage our growth, then our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We have experienced substantial growth in our business since inception. For example, our ~~total~~ headcount has grown from ~~676~~887 employees on ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 to ~~955~~1,119 employees on ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. In addition, we are rapidly expanding our international operations. Our international headcount grew from ~~103~~181 employees as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 to ~~202~~249 employees as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017, and we established operations in two new countries within that same period.~~2018. We expect to continue to expand our international operations in the future. We have also experienced significant growth in the number of customers, usage and amount of data that our platform and associated infrastructure support. This growth has placed and may continue to place significant demands on our corporate culture, operational infrastructure and management.

We believe that our corporate culture has been a critical component of our success. We have invested substantial time and resources in building our team and nurturing our culture. As we expand our business and mature as a public company, we may find it difficult to maintain our corporate culture while managing this growth. Any failure to manage our anticipated growth and organizational changes in a manner that preserves the key aspects of our culture could hurt our chance for future success, including

our ability to recruit and retain personnel, and effectively focus on and pursue our corporate objectives. This, in turn, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, in order to successfully manage our rapid growth, our organizational structure has become more complex. In order to manage these increasing complexities, we will need to continue to scale and adapt our operational, financial and management controls, as well as our reporting systems and procedures. The expansion of our systems and infrastructure will require us to commit substantial financial, operational and management resources before our revenue increases and without any assurances that our revenue will increase.

Finally, continued growth could strain our ability to maintain reliable service levels for our customers. If we fail to achieve the necessary level of efficiency in our organization as we grow, then our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Our quarterly results may fluctuate, and if we fail to meet securities analysts’ and investors’ expectations, then the trading price of our Class A common stock and the value of your investment could decline substantially.

Our results of operations, including the levels of our revenue, cost of revenue, gross margin and operating expenses, have fluctuated from quarter to quarter in the past and may continue to vary significantly in the future. These fluctuations are a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control, may be difficult to predict and may or may not fully reflect the underlying performance of our business. If our quarterly results of operations fall below the expectations of investors or securities analysts, then the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline substantially. Some of the important factors that may cause our results of operations to fluctuate from quarter to quarter include:

· our ability to retain and increase revenue from existing customers and attract new customers;

· fluctuations in the amount of revenue from our Variable Customer Accounts and our larger Base Customer Accounts;

· our ability to attract and retain enterprises and international organizations as customers;

· our ability to introduce new products and enhance existing products;

· competition and the actions of our competitors, including pricing changes and the introduction of new products, services and geographies;

· the number of new employees;

· changes in network service provider fees that we pay in connection with the delivery of communications on our platform;

· changes in cloud infrastructure fees that we pay in connection with the operation of our platform;

· changes in our pricing as a result of our optimization efforts or otherwise;

· reductions in pricing as a result of negotiations with our larger customers;

· the rate of expansion and productivity of our sales force, including our enterprise sales force, which has been a focus of our recent expansion efforts;

· change in the mix of products that our customers use;

· change in the revenue mix of U.S. and international products;

· changes in laws, regulations or regulatory enforcement, in the United States or internationally, that impact our ability to market, sell or deliver our products;

· the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures related to the operations and expansion of our business, including investments in our international expansion;

· significant security breaches of, technical difficulties with, or interruptions to, the delivery and use of our products on our platform;

· the timing of customer payments and any difficulty in collecting accounts receivable from customers;

· general economic conditions that may adversely affect a prospective customer’s ability or willingness to adopt our products, delay a prospective customer’s adoption decision, reduce the revenue that we generate from the use of our products or affect customer retention;

· changes in foreign currency exchange rates;

· extraordinary expenses such as litigation or other dispute-related settlement payments;

· sales tax and other tax determinations by authorities in the jurisdictions in which we conduct business;

· the impact of new accounting pronouncements;

· expenses in connection with mergers, acquisitions or other strategic transactions; and

· fluctuations in stock-based compensation expense.

The occurrence of one or more of the foregoing and other factors may cause our results of operations to vary significantly. As such, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations may not be meaningful and should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance. In addition, a significant percentage of our operating expenses is fixed in nature and is based on forecasted revenue trends. Accordingly, in the event of a revenue shortfall, we may not be able to mitigate the negative impact on our income (loss) and margins in the short term. If we fail to meet or exceed the expectations of investors or securities analysts, then the trading price of our Class A common stock could fall substantially, and we could face costly lawsuits, including securities class action suits.

Additionally, certain large scale events, such as major elections and sporting events, can significantly impact usage levels on our platform, which could cause fluctuations in our results of operations. We expect that significantly increased usage of all communications platforms, including ours, during certain seasonal and one-time events could impact delivery and quality of our products during those events. We also experienced increased expenses in the second quarter of 2017 due to our developer conference, SIGNAL, which we plan to host ~~again~~ in the fourth quarter of 2018 and plan to host annually. Such annual and one-time events may cause fluctuations in our results of operations and may impact both our revenue and operating expenses.

If we are not able to maintain and enhance our brand and increase market awareness of our company and products, then our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We believe that maintaining and enhancing the “Twilio” brand identity and increasing market awareness of our company and products, particularly among developers, is critical to achieving widespread acceptance of our platform, to strengthen our relationships with our existing customers and to our ability to attract new customers. The successful promotion of our brand will depend largely on our continued marketing efforts, our ability to continue to offer high quality products, our ability to be thought leaders in the cloud communications market and our ability to successfully differentiate our products and platform from competing products and services. Our brand promotion and thought leadership activities may not be successful or yield increased revenue. In addition, independent industry analysts often provide reviews of our products and competing products and services, which may significantly influence the perception of our products in the marketplace. If these reviews are negative or not as strong as reviews of our competitors’ products and services, then our brand may be harmed.

From time to time, our customers have complained about our products, such as complaints about our pricing and customer support. If we do not handle customer complaints effectively, then our brand and reputation may suffer, our customers may lose confidence in us and they may reduce or cease their use of our products. In addition, many of our customers post and discuss on social media about Internet-based products and services, including our products and platform. Our success depends, in part, on our ability to generate positive customer feedback and minimize negative feedback on social media channels where existing and potential customers seek and share information. If actions we take or changes we make to our products or platform upset these customers, then their online commentary could negatively affect our brand and reputation. Complaints or negative publicity about us, our products or our platform could materially and adversely impact our ability to attract and retain customers, our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The promotion of our brand also requires us to make substantial expenditures, and we anticipate that these expenditures will increase as our market becomes more competitive and as we expand into new markets. To the extent that these activities increase revenue, this revenue still may not be enough to offset the increased expenses we incur. If we do not successfully maintain and enhance our brand, then our business may not grow, we may see our pricing power reduced relative to competitors and we may lose customers, all of which would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our business depends on customers increasing their use of our products, and any loss of customers or decline in their use of our products could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our ability to grow and generate incremental revenue depends, in part, on our ability to maintain and grow our relationships with existing customers and to have them increase their usage of our platform. If our customers do not increase their use of our products, then our revenue may decline and our results of operations may be harmed. For example, Uber, our largest Base Customer, ~~Account, has~~ decreased ~~their~~its usage of our products throughout 2017, which ~~will lead to~~has and may result in decreased revenues from this customer versus recent historical periods. Customers are charged based on the usage of our products. Most of our customers do not have long-term contractual financial commitments to us and, therefore, most of our customers may reduce or cease their use of our products at any time without penalty or termination charges. Customers may terminate or reduce their use of our products for any number of reasons, including if they are not satisfied with our products, the value proposition of our products or our ability to meet their needs and expectations. We cannot accurately predict customers’ usage levels and the loss of customers or reductions in their usage levels of our products may each have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial ~~condition. Reductions in usage from existing customers~~condition and ~~the loss of customers could~~may cause our Dollar-Based Net Expansion Rate to decline in the future if customers are not satisfied with our products, the value proposition of our products or our ability to ~~otherwise~~ meet their needs and expectations. If a significant number of customers cease using, or reduce their usage of our products, then we may be required to spend significantly more on sales and marketing than we currently plan to spend in order to maintain or increase revenue from customers. Such additional sales and marketing expenditures could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we are unable to attract new customers in a cost-effective manner, then our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.

In order to grow our business, we must continue to attract new customers in a cost-effective manner. We use a variety of marketing channels to promote our products and platform, such as developer events and developer evangelism, as well as search engine marketing and optimization. We periodically adjust the mix of our other marketing programs such as regional customer events, email campaigns, billboard advertising and public relations initiatives. If the costs of the marketing channels we use increase dramatically, then we may choose to use alternative and less expensive channels, which may not be as effective as the channels we currently use. As we add to or change the mix of our marketing strategies, we may need to expand into more expensive channels than those we are currently in, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We will incur marketing expenses before we are able to recognize any revenue that the marketing initiatives may generate, and these expenses may not result in increased revenue or brand awareness. We have made in the past, and may make in the future, significant expenditures and investments in new marketing campaigns, and we cannot ~~assure you~~guarantee that any such investments will lead to the cost-effective acquisition of additional customers. If we are unable to maintain effective marketing programs, then our ability to attract new customers could be materially and adversely affected, our advertising and marketing expenses could increase substantially and our results of operations may suffer.

If we do not develop enhancements to our products and introduce new products that achieve market acceptance, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Our ability to attract new customers and increase revenue from existing customers depends in part on our ability to enhance and improve our existing products, increase adoption and usage of our products and introduce new products. The success of any enhancements or new products depends on several factors, including timely completion, adequate quality testing, actual performance quality, market-accepted pricing levels and overall market acceptance. Enhancements and new products that we develop may not be introduced in a timely or cost-effective manner, may contain errors or defects, may have interoperability difficulties with our platform or other products or may not achieve the broad market acceptance necessary to generate significant revenue. Furthermore, our ability to increase the usage of our products depends, in part, on the development of new use cases for our products, which is typically driven by our developer community and may be outside of our control. We also have invested, and may continue to invest, in the acquisition of complementary businesses, technologies, services, products and other assets that expand the products that we can offer our customers. We may make these investments without being certain that they will result in products or enhancements that will be accepted by existing or prospective customers. Our ability to generate usage of additional products by our customers may also require increasingly sophisticated and more costly sales efforts and result in a longer sales cycle. If we are unable to successfully enhance our existing products to meet evolving customer requirements, increase adoption and usage of our products, develop new products, or if our efforts to increase the usage of our products are more expensive than we expect, then our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.

If we are unable to increase adoption of our products by enterprises, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Historically, we have relied on the adoption of our products by software developers through our self-service model for a significant majority of our revenue, and we currently generate only a small portion of our revenue from enterprise customers. Our ability to increase our customer base, especially among enterprises, and achieve broader market acceptance of our products will depend, in part, on our ability to effectively organize, focus and train our sales and marketing personnel. We have limited experience selling to enterprises and only recently established an enterprise-focused sales force.

Our ability to convince enterprises to adopt our products will depend, in part, on our ability to attract and retain sales personnel with experience selling to enterprises. We believe that there is significant competition for experienced sales professionals with the skills and technical knowledge that we require. Our ability to achieve significant revenue growth in the future will depend, in part, on our ability to recruit, train and retain a sufficient number of experienced sales professionals, particularly those with experience selling to enterprises. In addition, even if we are successful in hiring qualified sales personnel, new hires require significant training and experience before they achieve full productivity, particularly for sales efforts targeted at enterprises and new territories. Our recent hires and planned hires may not become as productive as quickly as we expect and we may be unable to hire or retain sufficient numbers of qualified individuals in the future in the markets where we do business. Because we do not have a long history of targeting our sales efforts at enterprises, we cannot predict whether, or to what extent, our sales will increase as we organize and train our sales force or how long it will take for sales personnel to become productive.

As we seek to increase the adoption of our products by enterprises, we expect to incur higher costs and longer sales cycles. In this market segment, the decision to adopt our products may require the approval of multiple technical and business decision makers, including security, compliance, procurement, operations and IT. In addition, while enterprise customers may quickly deploy our products on a limited basis, before they will commit to deploying our products at scale, they often require extensive education about our products and significant customer support time, engage in protracted pricing negotiations and seek to secure readily available development resources. In addition, sales cycles for enterprises are inherently more complex and less predictable than the sales through our self-service model, and some enterprise customers may not use our products enough to generate revenue that justifies the cost to obtain such customers. In addition, these complex and resource intensive sales efforts could place additional strain on our ~~limited~~ product and engineering resources. Further, enterprises, including some of our customers, may choose to develop their own solutions that do not include our products. They also may demand reductions in pricing as their usage of our products increases, which could have an adverse impact on our gross margin. As a result of our limited experience selling and marketing to enterprises, our efforts to sell to these potential customers may not be successful. If we are unable to increase the revenue that we derive from enterprises, then our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

If we are unable to expand our relationships with existing Solution Partner customers and add new Solution Partner customers, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We believe that the continued growth of our business depends in part upon developing and expanding strategic relationships with Solution Partner customers. Solution Partner customers embed our software products in their solutions, such as software applications for contact centers and sales force and marketing automation, and then sell such solutions to other businesses. When potential customers do not have the available developer resources to build their own applications, we refer them to our network of Solution Partner customers.

As part of our growth strategy, we intend to expand our relationships with existing Solution Partner customers and add new Solution Partner customers. If we fail to expand our relationships with existing Solution Partner customers or establish relationships with new Solution Partner customers in a timely and cost-effective manner, or at all, then our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected. Additionally, even if we are successful at building these relationships but there are problems or issues with integrating our products into the solutions of these customers, our reputation and ability to grow our business may be harmed.

We rely upon Amazon Web Services to operate our platform, and any disruption of or interference with our use of Amazon Web Services would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We outsource substantially all of our cloud infrastructure to Amazon Web Services ~~or AWS,~~(“AWS”), which hosts our products and platform. ~~Customers of our products~~Our customers need to be able to access our platform at any time, without interruption or degradation of performance. AWS runs its own platform that we access, and we are, therefore, vulnerable to service interruptions at AWS. We have experienced, and expect that in the future we may experience interruptions, delays and outages in service and availability ~~from time to time~~ due to a variety of factors, including infrastructure changes, human or software errors, website hosting disruptions and capacity constraints. Capacity constraints could be due to a number of potential causes, including technical failures, natural disasters, fraud or security attacks. For instance, in

September 2015, AWS suffered a significant outage that had a widespread impact on the ability of our customers to use several of our products. In addition, if our security, or that of AWS, is compromised, or our products or platform are unavailable or our users are unable to use our products within a reasonable amount of time or at all, then our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected. In some instances, we may not be able to identify the cause or causes of these performance problems within a period of time acceptable to our customers. It may become increasingly difficult to maintain and improve our platform performance, especially during peak usage times, as our products become more complex and the usage of our products increases. To the extent that we do not effectively address capacity constraints, either through AWS or alternative providers of cloud infrastructure, our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected. In addition, any changes in service levels from AWS may adversely affect our ability to meet our customers’ requirements.

The substantial majority of the services we use from AWS are for cloud-based server capacity and, to a lesser extent, storage and other optimization offerings. AWS enables us to order and reserve server capacity in varying amounts and sizes distributed across multiple regions. We access AWS infrastructure through standard IP connectivity. AWS provides us with computing and storage capacity pursuant to an agreement that continues until terminated by either party. AWS may terminate the agreement by providing 30 days prior written notice, and it may in some cases terminate the agreement immediately for cause upon notice. Although we expect that we could receive similar services from other third parties, if any of our arrangements with AWS are terminated, we could experience interruptions on our platform and in our ability to make our products available to customers, as well as delays and additional expenses in arranging alternative cloud infrastructure services.

Any of the above circumstances or events may harm our reputation, cause customers to stop using our products, impair our ability to increase revenue from existing customers, impair our ability to grow our customer base, subject us to financial penalties and liabilities under our service level agreements and otherwise harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

To deliver our products, we rely on network service providers for our network service.

We currently interconnect with network service providers around the world to enable the use by our customers of our products over their networks. We expect that we will continue to rely heavily on network service providers for these services going forward. Our reliance on network service providers has reduced our operating flexibility, ability to make timely service changes and control quality of service. In addition, the fees that we are charged by network service providers may change daily or weekly, while we do not typically change our customers’ pricing as rapidly.

At times, network service providers have instituted additional fees due to regulatory, competitive or other industry related changes that increase our network costs. While we have historically responded to these fee increases through a combination of further negotiating efforts with our network service providers, absorbing the increased costs or changing our prices to customers, there is no guarantee that we will continue to be able to do so in the future without a material negative impact to our business. Additionally, our ability to respond to any new fees may be constrained if all network providers in a particular market impose equivalent fee structures, if the magnitude of the fees is disproportionately large when compared to the underlying prices paid by our customers, or if the market conditions limit our ability to increase the price we charge our customers.

Furthermore, many of these network service providers do not have long-term committed contracts with us and may terminate their agreements with us without notice or restriction. If a significant portion of our network service providers stop providing us with access to their infrastructure, fail to provide these services to us on a cost-effective basis, cease operations, or otherwise terminate these services, the delay caused by qualifying and switching to other network service providers could be time consuming and costly and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Further, if problems occur with our network service providers, it may cause errors or poor quality communications with our products, and we could encounter difficulty identifying the source of the problem. The occurrence of errors or poor quality communications on our products, whether caused by our platform or a network service provider, may result in the loss of our existing customers or the delay of adoption of our products by potential customers and may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our future success depends in part on our ability to drive the adoption of our products by international customers.

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2018, and in the years 2017 and ~~the years ended December 31,~~ 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ we derived ~~22%~~24%, ~~16%~~23% and ~~14%~~16% of our revenue, respectively, from customer accounts located outside the United States. The future success of our business will depend, in part, on our ability to expand our customer base worldwide. While we have been rapidly expanding our sales efforts internationally, our experience in selling our products outside of the United States is limited. Furthermore, our developer-first business model may not be successful or have the same traction outside the United States. As a result, our investment in marketing our products to these potential customers may not be successful. If we are unable to increase the revenue that we derive from international customers, then our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We are in the process of expanding our international operations, which exposes us to significant risks.

We are continuing to expand our international operations to increase our revenue from customers outside of the United States as part of our growth strategy. Between ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, our international headcount grew from ~~103~~181 employees to ~~202 employees, and we opened two new offices outside of the United States.~~249 employees. We expect ~~in the future,~~ to open additional foreign offices and hire employees to work at these offices in order to reach new customers and gain access to additional technical talent. Operating in international markets requires significant resources and management attention and will subject us to regulatory, economic and political risks in addition to those we already face in the United States. Because of our limited experience with international operations ~~as well as~~or with developing and managing sales in international markets, our international expansion efforts may not be successful.

In addition, we will face risks in doing business internationally that could adversely affect our business, including:

· exposure to political developments in the United Kingdom ~~(U.K.~~(“U.K.”), including the ~~outcome~~planned departure of the U.K. ~~referendum on membership in~~from the European Union (EU), in March 2019, which has created an uncertain political and economic environment, instability for businesses and volatility in global financial markets;

· the difficulty of managing and staffing international operations and the increased operations, travel, infrastructure and legal compliance costs associated with numerous international locations;

· our ability to effectively price our products in competitive international markets;

· new and different sources of competition;

· our ability to comply with the General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which went into effect on May 25, 2018, and the California Consumer Privacy Act, which will be effective as of January 1, 2020;

· potentially greater difficulty collecting accounts receivable and longer payment cycles;

· higher or more variable network service provider fees outside of the United States;

· the need to adapt and localize our products for specific countries;

· the need to offer customer support in various languages;

· difficulties in understanding and complying with local laws, regulations and customs in foreign jurisdictions;

· difficulties with differing technical and environmental standards, data privacy and telecommunications regulations and certification requirements outside the United States, which could prevent customers from deploying our products or limit their usage;

· export controls and economic sanctions administered by the Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and Security and the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control;

· compliance with various anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and United Kingdom Bribery Act of 2010;

· tariffs and other non-tariff barriers, such as quotas and local content rules;

· more limited protection for intellectual property rights in some countries;

· adverse tax consequences;

· fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which could increase the price of our products outside of the United States, increase the expenses of our international operations and expose us to foreign currency exchange rate risk;

· currency control regulations, which might restrict or prohibit our conversion of other currencies into U.S. dollars;

· restrictions on the transfer of funds;

· deterioration of political relations between the United States and other countries; and

· political or social unrest or economic instability in a specific country or region in which we operate, which could have an adverse impact on our operations in that location.

Also, due to costs from our international expansion efforts and network service provider fees outside of the United States, ~~that~~which generally are ~~generally~~ higher than domestic rates, our gross margin for international customers is typically lower than our gross margin for domestic customers. As a result, our gross margin may be impacted and fluctuate as we expand our operations and customer base worldwide.

Our failure to manage any of these risks successfully could harm our international operations, and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We currently generate significant revenue from our largest customers, and the loss or decline in revenue from any of these customers could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2018, and in the years 2017 and ~~the years ended December 31,~~ 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ our 10 largest Active Customer Accounts generated an aggregate of ~~20%~~18%, ~~30%~~19% and ~~32%~~30% of our revenue, respectively. In addition, a significant portion of our revenue comes from two customers, one of which is a Variable Customer Account.

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2018, and in the years 2017 and ~~the years ended December 31,~~ 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ WhatsApp, a Variable Customer, ~~Account,~~ accounted for 5%7%, 9%6% and ~~17%~~9% of our revenue, respectively. WhatsApp uses our Programmable Voice products and Programmable Messaging products in its applications to verify new and existing users on its service. Our Variable Customer Accounts, including WhatsApp, do not have long-term contracts with us and may reduce or fully terminate their usage of our products at any time without notice, penalty or termination charges. In addition, the usage of our products by WhatsApp and other Variable Customer Accounts may change significantly between periods.

In the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2018, and in the years 2017 and ~~the years ended December 31,~~ 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ a second customer, Uber, a Base Customer, ~~Account,~~ accounted for 9%4%, ~~14%~~8% and 9%14% of our revenue, respectively. Uber uses our Programmable Messaging products and Programmable Voice products. ~~Although~~ Uber, ~~has entered into a minimum commitment contract with us, its usage historically has significantly exceeded the minimum revenue commitment in its contract, and it~~or any other one of our Base Customers, could significantly reduce ~~its~~their usage of our products without notice or penalty. ~~As we previously disclosed,~~ Uber decreased ~~their~~its usage of our products throughout 2017 and may continue to do so in the future.

In the event that our large customers do not continue to use our products, use fewer of our products, or use our products in a more limited capacity, or not at all, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

The market in which we participate is intensely competitive, and if we do not compete effectively, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be harmed.

The market for cloud communications is rapidly evolving, significantly fragmented and highly competitive, with relatively low barriers to entry in some segments. The principal competitive factors in our market include completeness of offering, credibility with developers, global reach, ease of integration and programmability, product features, platform scalability, reliability, security and performance, brand awareness and reputation, the strength of sales and marketing efforts, customer support, as well as the cost of deploying and using our products. Our competitors fall into four primary categories:

· legacy on-premise vendors, such as Avaya and Cisco;

· regional network service providers that offer limited developer functionality on top of their own physical infrastructure;

· smaller software companies that compete with portions of our product line; and

· ~~SaaS~~Software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) companies that offer prepackaged applications for a narrow set of use cases.

Some of our competitors and potential competitors are larger and have greater name recognition, longer operating histories, more established customer relationships, larger budgets and significantly greater resources than we do. In addition, they have the operating flexibility to bundle competing products and services at little or no perceived incremental cost, including offering them at a lower price as part of a larger sales transaction. As a result, our competitors may be able to respond more quickly and effectively than we can to new or changing opportunities, technologies, standards or customer requirements. In addition, some competitors may offer products or services that address one or a limited number of functions at lower prices, with greater depth than our products or in different geographies. Our current and potential competitors may develop and market new products and services with comparable

functionality to our products, and this could lead to us having to decrease prices in order to remain competitive. Customers utilize our products in many ways and use varying levels of functionality that our products offer or are capable of supporting or enabling within their applications. Customers that use many of the features of our products or use our products to support or enable core functionality for their applications may have difficulty or find it impractical to replace our products with a competitor’s products or services, while customers that use only limited functionality may be able to more easily replace our products with competitive offerings. Our customers also may ~~also~~choose to build some of the functionality our products provide, ~~themselves,~~ which may limit or eliminate their demand for our products.

With the introduction of new products and services and new market entrants, we expect competition to intensify in the future. In addition, some of our customers may choose to use our products and our competitors’ products at the same time. Further, customers and consumers may choose to adopt other forms of electronic communications or alternative communication platforms.

Moreover, as we expand the scope of our products, we may face additional competition. If one or more of our competitors were to merge or partner with another of our competitors, the change in the competitive landscape could also adversely affect our ability to compete effectively. In addition, some of our competitors have lower list prices than us, which may be attractive to certain customers even if those products have different or lesser functionality. If we are unable to maintain our current pricing due to ~~the~~ competitive pressures, our margins will be reduced and our business, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected. In addition, pricing pressures and increased competition generally could result in reduced revenue, reduced margins, increased losses or the failure of our products to achieve or maintain widespread market acceptance, any of which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We have a limited operating history, which makes it difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospects and increases the risk of your investment.

We were founded and launched our first product in 2008. As a result of our limited operating history, our ability to forecast our future results of operations is limited and subject to a number of uncertainties, including our ability to plan for future growth. Our historical revenue growth should not be considered indicative of our future performance. We have encountered and will encounter risks and uncertainties frequently experienced by growing companies in rapidly changing industries, such as:

· market acceptance of our products and platform;

· adding new customers, particularly enterprises;

· retention of customers;

· the successful expansion of our business, particularly in markets outside of the United States;

· competition;

· our ability to control costs, particularly our operating expenses;

· network outages or security breaches and any associated expenses;

· foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;

· executing acquisitions and integrating the acquired businesses, technologies, services, products and other assets; and

· general economic and political conditions.

If we do not address these risks successfully, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We have limited experience with respect to determining the optimal prices for our products.

We charge our customers based on their use of our products. We expect that we may need to change our pricing from time to time. In the past we have sometimes reduced our prices either for individual customers in connection with long-term agreements or for a particular product. One of the challenges to our pricing is that the fees that we pay to network service providers over whose networks we transmit communications can vary daily or weekly and are affected by volume and other factors ~~which~~that may be outside of our control

and difficult to predict. This can result in ~~our~~us incurring increased costs ~~which~~that we may be unable or unwilling to pass through to our customers, which could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Further, as competitors introduce new products or services that compete with ours or reduce their prices, we may be unable to attract new customers or retain existing customers based on our historical pricing. As we expand internationally, we also must determine the appropriate price to enable us to compete effectively internationally. Moreover, enterprises, which are a primary focus for our direct sales efforts, may demand substantial price concessions. In addition, if the mix of products sold changes, including for a shift to IP-based products, then we may need to, or choose to, revise our pricing. As a result, in the future we may be required or choose to reduce our prices or change our pricing model, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We typically provide monthly uptime service level commitments of up to 99.95% under our agreements with customers. If we fail to meet these contractual commitments, then our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Our agreements with customers typically provide for service level commitments. If we suffer extended periods of downtime for our products or platform and we are unable to meet these commitments, then we are contractually obligated to provide a service credit, which is typically 10% of the customer’s amounts due for the month in question. In addition, the performance and availability of AWS, which provides our cloud ~~infrastructure~~infrastructures is outside of our control and, therefore, we are not in full control of whether we meet ~~the~~our service level commitments. As a result, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected if we suffer unscheduled downtime that exceeds the service level commitments we have made to our customers. Any extended service outages could adversely affect our business and reputation.

Breaches of our networks or systems, or those of AWS or our network service providers, could degrade our ability to conduct our business, compromise the integrity of our products and platform, result in significant data losses and the theft of our intellectual property, damage our reputation, expose us to liability to third parties and require us to incur significant additional costs to maintain the security of our networks and data.

We depend upon our IT systems to conduct virtually all of our business operations, ranging from our internal operations and research and development activities to our marketing and sales efforts and communications with our customers and business partners. Individuals or entities may attempt to penetrate our network security, or that of our platform, and to cause harm to our business operations, including by misappropriating our proprietary information or that of our customers, employees and business partners or to cause interruptions of our products and platform. Because the techniques used by such individuals or entities to access, disrupt or sabotage devices, systems and networks change frequently and may not be recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques, and we may not become aware in a timely manner of such a security breach, which could exacerbate any damage we experience. Additionally, we depend upon our employees and contractors to appropriately handle confidential and sensitive data, including customer data, and to deploy our IT resources in a safe and secure manner that does not expose our network systems to security breaches or the loss of data. Any data security incidents, including internal malfeasance by our employees, unauthorized access or usage, virus or similar breach or disruption of us or our ~~services~~service providers, such as AWS or network service providers, could result in loss of confidential information, damage to our reputation, loss of customers, litigation, regulatory investigations, fines, penalties and other liabilities. Accordingly, if our cybersecurity measures ~~and~~or those of AWS ~~and~~or our network service providers, fail to protect against unauthorized access, attacks (which may include sophisticated cyberattacks) ~~and~~or the mishandling of data by our employees and contractors, then our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Defects or errors in our products could diminish demand for our products, harm our business and results of operations and subject us to liability.

Our customers use our products for important aspects of their businesses, and any errors, defects or disruptions to our products and any other performance problems with our products could damage our customers’ businesses and, in turn, hurt our brand and reputation. We provide regular updates to our products, which have in the past contained, and may in the future contain, undetected errors, failures, vulnerabilities and bugs when first introduced or released. Real or perceived errors, failures or bugs in our products could result in negative publicity, loss of or delay in market acceptance of our platform, loss of competitive position, lower customer retention or claims by customers for losses sustained by them. In such an event, we may be required, or may choose, for customer relations or other reasons, to expend additional resources in order to help correct the problem. In addition, we may not carry insurance sufficient to compensate us for any losses that may result from claims arising from defects or disruptions in our products. As a result, our reputation and our brand could be harmed, and our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

If we fail to adapt and respond effectively to rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards, changing regulations, and changing customer needs, requirements or preferences, our products may become less competitive.

The market for communications in general, and cloud communications in particular, is subject to rapid technological change, evolving industry standards, changing regulations, as well as changing customer needs, requirements and preferences. The success of our business will depend, in part, on our ability to adapt and respond effectively to these changes on a timely basis. If we are unable to develop new products that satisfy our customers and provide enhancements and new features for our existing products that keep pace with rapid technological and industry change, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected. If new technologies emerge that are able to deliver competitive products and services at lower prices, more efficiently, more conveniently or more securely, such technologies could adversely impact our ability to compete effectively.

Our platform must ~~also~~ integrate with a variety of network, hardware, mobile and software platforms and technologies, and we need to continuously modify and enhance our products and platform to adapt to changes and innovation in these technologies. If customers adopt new software platforms or infrastructure, we may be required to develop new versions of our products to work with those new platforms or infrastructure. This development effort may require significant resources, which would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Any failure of our products and platform to operate effectively with evolving or new platforms and technologies could reduce the demand for our products. If we are unable to respond to these changes in a cost-effective manner, our products may become less marketable and less competitive or obsolete, and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Our reliance on SaaS technologies from third parties may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We rely heavily on hosted SaaS technologies from third parties in order to operate critical internal functions of our business, including enterprise resource planning, customer support and customer relations management services. If these services become unavailable due to extended outages or interruptions, or because they are no longer available on commercially reasonable terms or prices, our expenses could increase. As a result, our ability to manage our operations could be interrupted and our processes for managing our sales process and supporting our customers could be impaired until equivalent services, if available, are identified, obtained and implemented, all of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we are unable to develop and maintain successful relationships with independent software vendors and system integrators, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

We believe that continued growth of our business depends in part upon identifying, developing and maintaining strategic relationships with independent software vendor ~~(ISV)~~(“ISV”) development platforms and system integrators. As part of our growth strategy, we plan to further develop product partnerships with ISV development platforms to embed our products as additional distribution channels and also intend to further develop partnerships and specific solution areas with systems integrators. If we fail to establish these relationships in a timely and cost-effective manner, or at all, then our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected. Additionally, even if we are successful at developing these relationships but there are problems or issues with the integrations or enterprises are not willing to purchase through ISV development platforms, our reputation and ability to grow our business may ~~also~~ be adversely affected.

Any failure to offer ~~high-quality~~high quality customer support may adversely affect our relationships with our customers and prospective customers, and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Many of our customers depend on our customer support team to assist them in deploying our products effectively to help them to resolve post-deployment issues quickly and to provide ongoing support. If we do not devote sufficient resources or are otherwise unsuccessful in assisting our customers effectively, it could adversely affect our ability to retain existing customers and could prevent prospective customers from adopting our products. We may be unable to respond quickly enough to accommodate short-term increases in demand for customer support. We also may be unable to modify the nature, scope and delivery of our customer support to compete with changes in the support services provided by our competitors. Increased demand for customer support, without corresponding revenue, could increase costs and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our sales are highly dependent on our business reputation and on positive recommendations from developers. Any failure to maintain ~~high-quality~~high quality customer support, or a market perception that we do not maintain ~~high-quality~~high quality customer support, could adversely affect our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition.

We have been sued, and may, in the future, be sued by third parties for alleged infringement of their proprietary rights, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

There is considerable patent and other intellectual property development activity in our industry. Our future success depends, in part, on not infringing the intellectual property rights of others. Our competitors or other third parties have claimed and may, in the future, claim that we are infringing upon their intellectual property rights, and we may be found to be infringing upon such rights. For example, on April 30, 2015, Telesign Corporation ~~or Telesign,~~(“Telesign”), filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court, Central District of California ~~(Telesign I)~~(“Telesign I”). Telesign alleges that we are infringing three U.S. patents that it holds: U.S. Patent No. 8,462,920 (“‘920”), U.S. Patent No. 8,687,038 (“‘038”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,945,034 (“‘034”). The patent infringement allegations in the lawsuit relate to our ~~Programmable Authentication~~Account Security products, our two-factor authentication use case and an API tool to find information about a phone number. Subsequently, on March 28, 2016, Telesign filed a second lawsuit against us in the United States District Court, Central District of California ~~(Telesign II)~~(“Telesign II”), alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,300,792 (“‘792”) held by Telesign. The ‘792 patent is in the same patent family as the ‘920 and ‘038 patents asserted in Telesign I, and the infringement allegations in Telesign II relate to our ~~Programmable Authentication~~Account Security products and our two-factor authentication use case. With respect to each of the patents asserted in Telesign I and Telesign II, the complaints seek, among other things, to enjoin us from allegedly infringing these patents along with damages for lost profits. See the section titled “Item 3. Legal Proceedings.” We intend to vigorously defend ourselves against these lawsuits and believe we have meritorious defenses to each matter in which we are a defendant. However, litigation is inherently uncertain, and any judgment or injunctive relief entered against us or any adverse settlement could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, litigation can involve significant management time and attention and be expensive, regardless of outcome. During the course of these lawsuits, there may be announcements of the results of hearings and motions and other interim developments related to the litigation. If securities analysts or investors regard these announcements as negative, the trading price of our Class A common stock may decline.

In the future, we may receive claims from third parties, including our competitors, that our products or platform and underlying technology infringe or violate a third party’s intellectual property rights, and we may be found to be infringing upon such rights. We may be unaware of the intellectual property rights of others that may cover some or all of our technology. Any claims or litigation could cause us to incur significant expenses and, if successfully asserted against us, could require that we pay substantial damages or ongoing royalty payments, prevent us from offering our products, or require that we comply with other unfavorable terms. We may also be obligated to indemnify our customers or business partners in connection with any such litigation and to obtain licenses or modify our products or platform, which could further exhaust our resources. Even if we were to prevail in the event of claims or litigation against us, any claim or litigation regarding intellectual property could be costly and time-consuming and divert the attention of our management and other employees from our business. Patent infringement, trademark infringement, trade secret misappropriation and other intellectual property claims and proceedings brought against us, whether successful or not, could harm to our brand, business, results of operations and financial condition.

Indemnity provisions in various agreements potentially expose us to substantial liability for intellectual property infringement and other losses.

Our agreements with customers and other third parties typically include indemnification or other provisions under which we agree to indemnify or otherwise be liable to them for losses suffered or incurred as a result of claims of intellectual property infringement, damages caused by us to property or persons or other liabilities relating to or arising from our products or platform or other acts or omissions. The term of these contractual provisions often survives termination or expiration of the applicable agreement. Large indemnity payments or damage claims from contractual breach could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. Although typically we ~~normally~~ contractually limit our liability with respect to such obligations, we may still incur substantial liability related to them. Any dispute with a customer with respect to such obligations could have adverse effects on our relationship with that customer and other current and prospective customers, ~~reduce~~ demand for our products and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We could incur substantial costs in protecting or defending our intellectual property rights, and any failure to protect our intellectual property could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our success depends, in part, on our ability to protect our brand and the proprietary methods and technologies that we develop under patent and other intellectual property laws of the United States and foreign jurisdictions so that we can prevent others from using our inventions and proprietary information. As of ~~September 30, 2017, we had 13 registered trademarks in the United States and 61 registered trademarks in foreign jurisdictions. In addition, as of September 30,~~December 31, 2017, in the United States, we had been issued 7477 patents, which expire between 2029 and 2036, and we had 4042 patent applications pending for examination and ~~two~~three pending provisional applications. As of such date, we also had seven issued patents and seven patent applications pending for examination in foreign jurisdictions, all of which are related to U.S. patents and patent applications. There can be no assurance that additional patents will be issued or that any patents that have been issued or that may be issued in the future will provide significant protection for our intellectual property. As of December 31, 2017, we had 14 registered trademarks in the United States and 61 registered trademarks in

foreign jurisdictions. If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights adequately, our competitors might gain access to our technology and our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

There can be no assurance that the particular forms of intellectual property protection that we seek, including business decisions about when to file ~~trademark~~patent applications and ~~patent~~trademark applications, will be adequate to protect our business. We could be required to spend significant resources to monitor and protect our intellectual property rights. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce our intellectual property rights, determine the validity and scope of our proprietary rights or those of others, or defend against claims of infringement or invalidity. Such litigation could be costly, time-consuming and distracting to management, result in a diversion of significant resources, the narrowing or invalidation of portions of our intellectual property and have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights may be met with defenses, counterclaims and countersuits attacking the validity and enforceability of our intellectual property rights or alleging that we infringe the counterclaimant’s own intellectual property. Any of our patents, copyrights, trademarks or other intellectual property rights could be challenged by others or invalidated through administrative process or litigation.

We also rely, in part, on confidentiality agreements with our business partners, employees, consultants, advisors, customers and others in our efforts to protect our proprietary technology, processes and methods. These agreements may not effectively prevent disclosure of our confidential information, and it may be possible for unauthorized parties to copy our software or other proprietary technology or information, or to develop similar software independently without our having an adequate remedy for unauthorized use or disclosure of our confidential information. In addition, others may independently discover our trade secrets and proprietary information, and in these cases we would not be able to assert any trade secret rights against those parties. Costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and failure to obtain or maintain trade secret protection could adversely affect our competitive business position.

In addition, the laws of some countries do not protect intellectual property and other proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. To the extent we expand our international activities, our exposure to unauthorized copying, transfer and use of our proprietary technology or information may increase.

We cannot be certain that our means of protecting our intellectual property and proprietary rights will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar technology. If we fail to meaningfully protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Our use of open source software could negatively affect our ability to sell our products and subject us to possible litigation.

Our products and platform incorporate open source software, and we expect to continue to incorporate open source software in our products and platform in the future. Few of the licenses applicable to open source software have been interpreted by courts, and there is a risk that these licenses could be construed in a manner that could impose unanticipated conditions or restrictions on our ability to commercialize our products and platform. Moreover, although we have implemented policies to regulate the use and incorporation of open source software into our products and platform, we cannot be certain that we have not incorporated open source software in our products or platform in a manner that is inconsistent with such policies. If we fail to comply with open source licenses, we may be subject to certain requirements, including requirements that we offer our products that incorporate the open source software for no cost, that we make available source code for modifications or derivative works we create based upon, incorporating or using the open source software and that we license such modifications or derivative works under the terms of applicable open source licenses. If an author or other third party that distributes such open source software were to allege that we had not complied with the conditions of one or more of these licenses, we could be required to incur significant legal expenses defending against such allegations and could be subject to significant damages, enjoined from generating revenue from customers using products that contained the open source software and required to comply with onerous conditions or restrictions on these products. In any of these events, we and our customers could be required to seek licenses from third parties in order to continue offering our products and platform and to re-engineer our products or platform or discontinue offering our products to customers in the event re-engineering cannot be accomplished on a timely basis. Any of the foregoing could require us to devote additional research and development resources to re-engineer our products or platform, could result in customer dissatisfaction and may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may acquire or invest in companies, which may divert our management’s attention and result in debt or dilution to our stockholders. We may be unable to integrate acquired businesses and technologies successfully or achieve the expected benefits of such acquisitions.

We may evaluate and consider potential strategic transactions, including acquisitions of, or investments in, businesses, technologies, services, products and other assets in the future. We also may enter into relationships with other businesses to expand our products and platform, which could involve preferred or exclusive licenses, additional channels of distribution, discount pricing or investments in other companies.

Any acquisition, investment or business relationship may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. In particular, we may encounter difficulties assimilating or integrating the businesses, technologies, products, personnel or operations of the acquired companies, particularly if the key personnel of the acquired company choose not to work for us, their products or services are not easily adapted to work with our platform, or we have difficulty retaining the customers of any acquired business due to changes in ownership, management or otherwise. Acquisitions also may ~~also~~ disrupt our business, divert our resources ~~and~~or require significant management attention that would otherwise be available for development of our existing business. Moreover, the anticipated benefits of any acquisition, investment or business relationship may not be realized or we may be exposed to unknown risks or liabilities.

Negotiating these transactions can be ~~time-consuming,~~time consuming, difficult and expensive, and our ability to complete these transactions may often be subject to approvals that are beyond our control. Consequently, these transactions, even if announced, may not be completed. For one or more of those transactions, we may:

· issue additional equity securities that would dilute our existing stockholders;

· use cash that we may need in the future to operate our business;

· incur large charges or substantial liabilities;

· incur debt on terms unfavorable to us or that we are unable to repay;

· encounter difficulties retaining key employees of the acquired company or integrating diverse software codes or business cultures; ~~and~~or

· become subject to adverse tax consequences, substantial depreciation, or deferred compensation charges.

The occurrence of any of these foregoing could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We depend largely on the continued services of our senior management and other key employees, the loss of any of whom could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our future performance depends on the continued services and contributions of our senior management and other key employees to execute on our business plan, to develop our products and platform, to deliver our products to customers, to attract and retain customers and to identify and pursue opportunities. The loss of services of senior management or other key employees could significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our development and strategic objectives. In particular, we depend to a considerable degree on the vision, skills, experience and effort of our co-founder and Chief Executive Officer, Jeff Lawson. None of our executive officers or other senior management personnel is bound by a written employment agreement and any of them may terminate employment with us at any time with no advance notice. On February 13, 2018, we announced that our Chief Financial Officer, Lee Kirkpatrick, will be leaving our company. Though Mr. Kirkpatrick has indicated that he intends to remain with us until his replacement has been hired, we could experience a delay or disruption in the achievement of our business objectives while we search for and onboard a new Chief Financial Officer and during the period the new Chief Financial Officer gets up to speed on our business and financial and accounting systems. The replacement of any other of our senior management personnel would likely involve significant time and costs, and such loss could significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our business objectives. The loss of the services of other of our senior management or other key employees for any reason could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

~~Our management team has limited experience managing a public company.~~

Most members of our management team have limited experience managing a publicly-traded company, interacting with public company investors and complying with the increasingly complex laws pertaining to public companies. Our management team may not successfully or efficiently manage us as a public company subject to significant regulatory oversight and reporting obligations under the federal securities laws and the continuous scrutiny of securities analysts and investors. These new obligations and constituents require significant attention from our senior management and could divert their attention away from the day-to-day management of our business, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we are unable to hire, retain and motivate qualified personnel, our business will suffer.

Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to continue to attract and retain highly skilled personnel. We believe that there is, and will continue to be, intense competition for highly skilled management, technical, sales and other personnel with experience in our industry in the San Francisco Bay Area, where our headquarters are located, and in other locations where we maintain offices. We must provide competitive compensation packages and a ~~high-quality~~high quality work environment to hire, retain and motivate employees. If we are unable to retain and motivate our existing employees and attract qualified personnel to fill key positions, such as the Chief Financial Officer role, we may be unable to manage our business effectively, including the development, marketing and sale of our products, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. To the extent we hire personnel from competitors, we also may be subject to allegations that they have been improperly solicited or divulged proprietary or other confidential information.

Volatility in, or lack of performance of, our stock price may also affect our ability to attract and retain key personnel. Many of our key personnel are, or will soon be, vested in a substantial ~~amount~~number of shares of Class A common stock or stock options. Employees may be more likely to terminate their employment with us if the shares they own or the shares underlying their vested options have significantly appreciated in value relative to the original purchase prices of the shares or the exercise prices of the options, or, conversely, if the exercise prices of the options that they hold are significantly above the trading price of our Class A common stock. If we are unable to retain our employees, our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Our products and platform and our business are subject to a variety of U.S. and international laws and regulations, including those regarding privacy, data protection and information security, and our customers may be subject to regulations related to the handling and transfer of certain types of sensitive and confidential information. Any failure of our products to comply with or enable our customers and channel partners to comply with applicable laws and regulations would harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We and our customers that use our products may be subject to privacy- and data protection-related laws and regulations that impose obligations in connection with the collection, processing and use of personal data, financial data, health ~~data~~ or other similar data. Existing U.S. federal and various state and foreign privacy- and data protection-related laws and regulations are evolving and subject to potentially differing interpretations, and various legislative and regulatory bodies may expand current or enact new laws and regulations regarding privacy- and data protection-related matters. New laws, amendments to or re-interpretations of existing laws and regulations, rules of self-regulatory bodies, industry standards and contractual obligations may impact our business and practices, and we may be required to expend significant resources to adapt to these changes, or stop offering our products in certain countries. These developments could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The U.S. federal and various state and foreign governments have adopted or proposed limitations on, or requirements regarding, the collection, distribution, use, security and storage of personally identifiable information of individuals. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission and numerous state attorneys general are applying federal and state consumer protection laws to impose standards on the online collection, use and dissemination of data, and to the security measures applied to such data.

Similarly, many foreign countries and governmental bodies, including the EUEuropean Union (“EU”) member states, have laws and regulations concerning the collection and use of personally identifiable information obtained from individuals located in the EU or by businesses operating within their jurisdiction, which are often more restrictive than those in the United States. Laws and regulations in these jurisdictions apply broadly to the collection, use, storage, disclosure and security of personally identifiable information that identifies or may be used to identify an individual, such as names, telephone numbers, email addresses and, in some jurisdictions, IP addresses and other online identifiers. ~~In particular, on~~

For example, in April ~~27,~~ 2016 the ~~European Union~~EU adopted the General Data Protection Regulation ~~2016/679 (GDPR) that will take~~(“GDPR”), which took full effect on May 25, 2018. The GDPR will repeal and replace the EU Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC and it will be directly applicable across EU member states. The GDPR applies to any company established in the EU as well as to those outside the EU if they collect and use personal data through the provision of goods or services to individuals in the EU or monitoring their behavior (for example, through online tracking). The GDPR enhances data protection obligations for businesses and ~~provides direct legal obligations for~~requires service providers (data processors) processing personal data on behalf of customers ~~including with respect~~ to ~~cooperation~~cooperate with European data protection authorities, ~~implementation of~~implement security measures and ~~keeping~~keep records of personal data processing activities. Noncompliance with the GDPR can trigger ~~steep~~ fines equal to or greater of ~~up to~~ €20 million or 4% of global annual ~~revenues, whichever is higher.~~revenues. Given the breadth and depth of changes in data protection obligations, preparing to meet the ~~GDPR’s~~ requirements of GDPR before its ~~application on May 25, 2018 requires~~effective date has required significant time and resources, ~~and~~including a review of ~~the~~our technology and systems currently in use against the ~~GDPR’s requirements. We~~requirements of GDPR. There are taking steps to prepare for complying with the GDPR requirements, including integrating GDPR-compliant privacy protections into our products and services, commercial agreements and record-keeping practices to help us and our customers meet compliance GDPR obligations. Additionalalso additional EU laws and regulations (and member states implementations thereof) ~~further~~which govern the protection of consumers and of electronic communications. ~~Although~~If our efforts to comply with GDPR or other applicable EU laws and regulations are not successful, we may be subject to penalties and fines that would adversely impact our business and results of operations, and our ability to conduct business in the EU could be significantly impaired.

We have in the past relied on the EU-U.S and the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield frameworks approved by the European Commission in July 2016 and the Swiss Government in January 2017, respectively, which were designed to allow U.S. corporations to self-certify to the U.S. Department of Commerce and publicly commit to comply with the Privacy Shield requirements to freely import personal data from the EU and Switzerland. However, ongoing legal challenges to these frameworks has resulted in some uncertainty as to their validity. We anticipate engaging in efforts to legitimize data transfers from the European Economic Area, but we may experience hesitancy, reluctance, or refusal by European or multinational customers to continue to use our services due to the potential risk exposure to such customers as a result of the European Union Court of Justice ruling. We and our customers are at risk of enforcement actions taken

by an EU data protection authority until such point in time that we are able to ensure that all data transfers to us from the European Economic Area are legitimized. In addition, as the United Kingdom transitions out of the EU, we may encounter additional complexity with respect to data privacy and data transfers from the U.K.

Furthermore, outside of the EU, we continue to see increased regulation of data privacy and security, including the adoption of more stringent subject matter specific state laws in the United States. For example, on June 28, 2018, California enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which takes effect on January 1, 2020. The CCPA gives California residents expanded rights to access and delete their personal information, opt out of certain personal information sharing, and receive detailed information about how their personal information is used. The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that is expected to increase data breach litigation. The CCPA may increase our compliance costs and potential liability. Some observers have noted that the CCPA could mark the beginning of a trend toward more stringent state privacy legislation in the U.S., which could increase our potential liability and adversely affect our business.

The uncertainty and changes in the requirements of multiple jurisdictions may increase the cost of compliance, delay or reduce demand for our services, restrict our ability to offer services in certain locations, impact our customers’ ability to deploy our solutions in certain jurisdictions, or subject us to sanctions, by national data protection regulators, all of which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Additionally, although we endeavor to have our products and platform comply with applicable laws and regulations, these and other obligations may be modified, they may be interpreted and applied in an inconsistent manner from one jurisdiction to another, and they may conflict with one another, other regulatory requirements, contractual commitments or our internal ~~practices. In addition, we~~practices

We also may be bound by contractual obligations relating to our collection, use and disclosure of personal, financial and other data or may find it necessary or desirable to join industry or other self-regulatory bodies or other privacy- or data protection-related organizations that require compliance with their rules pertaining to privacy and data protection. ~~We also may be bound by contractual obligations relating to our collection, use and disclosure of personal, financial and other data.~~

We ~~have~~expect that there will continue to be new proposed laws, rules of self-regulatory bodies, regulations and industry standards concerning privacy, data protection and information security in the past relied on adherence to the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Safe Harbor Privacy Principles and compliance with the U.S.—EU and U.S.—Swiss Safe Harbor Frameworks as agreed to and set forth by the U.S. Department of Commerce, andUnited States, the European Union and ~~Switzerland. As a result of~~other jurisdictions, and we cannot yet determine the ~~October 6, 2015 European Union Court of Justice, or ECJ, decision in Case C-362/14 (Schrems v. Data Protection Commissioner) regarding the adequacy of the~~impact such future laws, rules, regulations and standards may have on our business. Moreover, existing U.S.—EU Safe Harbor Framework, the U.S.—EU Safe Harbor Framework is no longer deemed to be a valid method of compliance with restrictions set forth in the EU Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC (and member states’ implementations thereof) regarding the transfer of personal federal and various state and foreign privacy- and data ~~outside of the European Economic Area. On July 12, 2016, the European Commission adopted the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework to replace the Safe Harbor Framework~~protection-related laws and ~~on January 12, 2017, the Swiss Government announced the approval of the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework to replace the U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor Framework. We self-certified to the EU-U.S.~~regulations are evolving and Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Frameworks which ensure that we are implementing adequate privacy protections for EU personal data transferred to the U.S. The Privacy Shield Framework continues to face criticism from privacy advocates (which believe that it does not ensure adequate protections for personal data transferred to the US) and is subject to ~~pending legal challenges in the General Court of the ECJ. Likewise, another transfer mechanism provided by the EU~~potentially differing interpretations, and various legislative and regulatory bodies may expand current or enact new laws and regulations regarding privacy- and data protection legislation — the standard contractual clauses approved by the European Commission — is subject to a pending litigation before the Irish High Court (on grounds similar to those that led to the invalidation of the Safe Harbor framework), which recently referred questions on the validity of such clauses to the ECJ. In light of the aboveprotection-related matters. Because global laws, regulations and the uncertainties surrounding mechanisms for data transfers, we anticipate engaging in efforts to legitimize data transfers from the European Economic Area. We may be unsuccessful in establishing legitimate means of transferring data from the European Economic Area, we may experience hesitancy, reluctance, or refusal by European or multinational customers to continue to use our services due to the potential risk exposure to such customers as a result of the ECJ ruling, and we and our customers are at risk of enforcement actions taken by an EU data protection authority until such point in time that we ensure that all data transfers to us from the European Economic Area are legitimized. In addition, as the United Kingdom transitions out of the EU, we may encounter additional complexity with respect to dataindustry standards concerning privacy and data ~~transfers.~~

~~With respect~~security have continued to ~~all~~develop and evolve rapidly, it is possible that we or our products or platform may not be, or may not have been, compliant with each such applicable law, regulation and industry standard and compliance with such new laws or to changes to existing laws may impact our business and practices, require us to expend significant resources to adapt to these changes, or to stop offering our products in certain countries. These developments could adversely affect our business, results of ~~the foregoing, any~~operations and financial condition.

Any failure or perceived failure by us, our products or our platform to comply with new or existing U.S., EU or other foreign privacy or data security laws, regulations, policies, industry standards or legal obligations, or any security incident that results in the unauthorized access to, or acquisition, release or transfer of, personally identifiable information or other customer data may result in governmental investigations, inquiries, enforcement actions and prosecutions, private litigation, fines and penalties, adverse publicity or ~~adverse publicity.~~potential loss of business. For example, on February 18, 2016, a putative class action complaint was filed in the Alameda County Superior Court in California. The complaint alleges that our products permit the interception, recording and disclosure of communications at a customer’s request and in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act. ~~The complaint seeks injunctive relief as well as monetary damages. We intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit and believe we have meritorious defenses; however, this~~This litigation, or any other such actions in the future and related penalties could divert management’s attention and resources, adversely affect our brand, business, results of operations and financial condition.

We expect that there will continue to be new proposed laws, regulations and industry standards concerning privacy, data protection and information security in the United States, the European Union and other jurisdictions, and we cannot yet determine the impact such future laws, regulations and standards may have on our business. Because global laws, regulations and industry standards concerning privacy and data security have continued to develop and evolve rapidly, it is possible that we or our products or platform may not be, or may not have been, compliant with each such applicable law, regulation and industry standard.

Any such new laws, regulations, other legal obligations or industry standards, or any changed interpretation of existing laws, regulations or other standards may require us to incur additional costs and restrict our business operations. If our privacy or data security measures fail to comply with current or future laws, regulations, policies, legal obligations or industry standards, we may be subject to litigation, regulatory investigations, fines or other liabilities, as well as negative publicity and a potential loss of business.

Changes in laws and regulations related to the Internet or changes in the Internet infrastructure itself may diminish the demand for our products, and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The future success of our business depends upon the continued use of the Internet as a primary medium for commerce, communications and business applications. Federal, state or foreign government bodies or agencies have in the past adopted, and may in the future adopt, laws or regulations affecting the use of the Internet as a commercial medium. Changes in these laws or regulations could require us to modify our products and platform in order to comply with these changes. In addition, government agencies or private organizations have imposed and may impose additional taxes, fees or other charges for accessing the Internet or commerce conducted via the Internet. These laws or charges could limit the growth of Internet-related commerce or communications generally, or result in reductions in the demand for Internet-based products and services such as our products and platform. In addition, the use of the Internet as a business tool could be adversely affected due to delays in the development or adoption of new standards and protocols to handle increased demands of Internet activity, security, reliability, cost, ease-of-use, accessibility and quality of service. The performance of the Internet and its acceptance as a business tool has been adversely affected by “viruses”, “worms”, and similar malicious programs. If the use of the Internet is reduced as a result of these or other issues, then demand for our products could decline, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Certain of our products are subject to telecommunications-related regulations, and future legislative or regulatory actions could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

As a provider of communications products, we are subject to existing or potential ~~FCC~~Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) regulations relating to privacy, Telecommunications Relay Service ~~Fund~~fund contributions and other requirements. FCC classification of our Internet voice communications products as telecommunications services could result in additional federal and state regulatory obligations. If we do not comply with FCC rules and regulations, we could be subject to FCC enforcement actions, fines, loss of licenses and possibly restrictions on our ability to operate or offer certain of our products. Any enforcement action by the

FCC, which may be a public process, would hurt our reputation in the industry, possibly impair our ability to sell our products to customers and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our products are subject to a number of FCC regulations and laws that are administered by the FCC. Among others, we must comply (in whole or in part) with:

· the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, which regulates communications services and the provision of such services;

· the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ~~or TCPA,~~, which limits the use of automatic dialing systems, artificial or prerecorded voice messages, SMS text messages and fax machines;

· the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act ~~or CALEA,~~(“CALEA”), which requires covered entities to assist law enforcement in undertaking electronic surveillance;

· requirements to safeguard the privacy of certain customer information;

· payment of annual FCC regulatory fees based on our interstate and international revenues;

· rules pertaining to access to our services by people with disabilities and contributions to the Telecommunications Relay Services fund; and

· FCC rules regarding the use of customer proprietary network information.

If we do not comply with any current or future rules or regulations that apply to our business, we could be subject to substantial fines and penalties, and we may have to restructure our offerings, exit certain markets or raise the price of our products. In addition, any uncertainty regarding whether particular regulations apply to our business, and how they apply, could increase our costs or limit our ability to grow. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

As we continue to expand internationally, we have become subject to telecommunications laws and regulations in the foreign countries where we offer our products. Internationally, we currently offer our products in over 180 countries.

Our international operations are subject to country-specific governmental regulation and related actions that have increased and may continue to increase our costs or impact our products and platform or prevent us from offering or providing our products in certain countries. Certain of our products may be used by customers located in countries where voice and other forms of IP communications may be illegal or require special licensing or in countries on a U.S. embargo list. Even where our products are reportedly illegal or become illegal or where users are located in an embargoed country, users in those countries may be able to continue to use our products in those countries notwithstanding the illegality or embargo. We may be subject to penalties or governmental action if consumers continue to use our products in countries where it is illegal to do so, and any such penalties or governmental action may be costly and may harm our business and damage our brand and reputation. We may be required to incur additional expenses to meet applicable international regulatory requirements or be required to discontinue those services if required by law or if we cannot or will not meet those requirements.

If we are unable to effectively process local number and toll-free number portability provisioning in a timely manner or to obtain or retain direct inward dialing numbers and local or toll-free numbers, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected.

We support local number and toll-free number portability, which allows our customers to transfer their existing phone numbers to us and thereby retain their existing phone numbers when subscribing to our voice products. Transferring existing numbers is a manual process that can take up to 15 business days or longer to complete. A new customer of our voice products must maintain both our voice product and the customer’s existing phone service during the number transferring process. Any delay that we experience in transferring these numbers typically results from the fact that we depend on network service providers to transfer these numbers, a process that we do not control, and these network service providers may refuse or substantially delay the transfer of these numbers to us. Local number portability is considered an important feature by many potential customers, and if we fail to reduce any related delays, then we may experience increased difficulty in acquiring new customers.

In addition, our future success depends in part on our ability to procure large quantities of local and toll-free direct inward dialing numbers ~~or DIDs,~~(“DIDs”), in the United States and foreign countries at a reasonable cost and without restrictions. Our ability to procure, distribute and retain DIDs depends on factors outside of our control, such as applicable regulations, the practices of network

service providers that provide DIDs, such as offering DIDs with conditional minimum volume call level requirements, the cost of these DIDs and the level of overall competitive demand for new DIDs. Due to their limited availability, there are certain popular area code prefixes that we generally cannot obtain. Our inability to acquire or retain DIDs for our operations would make our voice and messaging products less attractive to potential customers in the affected local geographic areas. In addition, future growth in our customer base, together with growth in the customer bases of other providers of cloud communications, has increased, which increases our dependence on needing sufficiently large quantities of DIDs. It may become increasingly difficult to source larger quantities of DIDs as we scale and we may need to pay higher costs for DIDs, and DIDs may become subject to more stringent usage conditions. Any of the foregoing could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We face a risk of litigation resulting from customer misuse of our software to send unauthorized text messages in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

~~Text~~The actual or perceived improper sending of text messages may subject us to potential risks, including liabilities or claims relating to consumer protection laws. For example, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 restricts telemarketing and the use of automatic SMS text messages without proper consent. This has resulted in civil claims against ~~the Company~~our company and requests for information through third-party subpoenas. The scope and interpretation of the laws that are or may be applicable to the delivery of text messages are continuously evolving and developing. If we do not comply with these laws or regulations or if we become liable under these laws or regulations due to the failure of our customers to comply with these laws by obtaining proper consent, we could face direct liability.

We may be subject to governmental export controls and economic sanctions regulations that could impair our ability to compete in international markets due to licensing requirements and could subject us to liability if we are not in compliance with applicable laws.

~~Various~~Certain of our products and services may be subject to export control and economic sanctions regulations, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, U.S. Customs regulations and various economic and trade sanctions regulations administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Controls. Exports of our products and the provision of our services must be made in compliance with these laws and regulations. Although we take precautions to prevent our products from being provided in violation of such laws, we are aware of previous exports of certain of our products to a small number of persons and organizations that are the subject of U.S. sanctions or located in countries or regions subject to U.S. sanctions. If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we and certain of our employees could be subject to substantial civil or criminal penalties, including: the possible loss of export privileges; fines, which may be imposed on us and responsible employees or managers; and, in extreme cases, the incarceration of responsible employees or managers. Obtaining the necessary authorizations, including any required license, for a particular deployment may be time-consuming, is not guaranteed and may result in the delay or loss of sales opportunities. In addition, changes in our products or services, or changes in applicable export or economic sanctions regulations may create delays in the introduction and deployment of our products and services in international markets, or, in some cases, prevent the export of our products or provision of our services to certain countries or end users. Any change in export or economic sanctions regulations, shift in the enforcement or scope of existing regulations, or change in the countries, governments, persons or technologies targeted by such regulations, could also result in decreased use of our products and services, or in our decreased ability to export our products or provide our services to existing or prospective customers with international operations. Any decreased use of our products and services or limitation on our ability to export our products and provide our services could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Further, we incorporate encryption technology into certain of our products. Various countries regulate the import of certain encryption technology, including through import permitting and licensing requirements, and have enacted laws that could limit our customers’ ability to import our products into those countries. Encryption products and the underlying technology may also be subject to export control restrictions. Governmental regulation of encryption technology and regulation of exports of encryption products, or our failure to obtain required approval for our products, when applicable, could harm our international sales and adversely affect our revenue. Compliance with applicable regulatory requirements regarding the export of our products and provision of our services, including with respect to new releases of our products and services, may create delays in the introduction of our products and services in international markets, prevent our customers with international operations from deploying our products and using our services throughout their globally-distributed systems or, in some cases, prevent the export of our products or provision of our services to some countries altogether.

We may have additional tax liabilities, which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Significant judgments and estimates are required in determining our provision for income taxes and other tax liabilities. Our tax expense may be impacted, for example, if tax laws change or are clarified to our detriment or if tax authorities successfully challenge the tax positions that we take, such as, for example, positions relating to the arms-length pricing standards for our intercompany transactions and our state sales and use tax positions. In determining the adequacy of income taxes, we assess the likelihood of adverse outcomes that could result if our tax positions were challenged by the Internal Revenue Service ~~or IRS,~~(“IRS”), and other tax authorities. Should the IRS or other tax authorities assess additional taxes as a result of examinations, we may be required to record charges to operations that could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We are currently in discussions with certain states regarding prior state sales taxes that we may owe. We have reserved ~~$19.4~~$21.9 million on our ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017~~2018 balance sheet for these tax payments. The actual exposure could differ materially from our current estimates, and if the actual payments we make to these and other states exceed the accrual in our balance sheet, our results of operations would be harmed.

We could be subject to liability for ~~historic~~historical and future sales, use and similar taxes, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

We conduct operations in many tax jurisdictions throughout the United States. In many of these jurisdictions, non-income-based taxes, such as sales and use and telecommunications taxes, are assessed on our operations. We are subject to indirect taxes, and may be subject to certain other taxes, in some of these jurisdictions. Historically, we have not billed or collected these taxes and, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States or (“U.S. ~~GAAP,~~GAAP”), we have recorded a provision for our tax exposure in these jurisdictions when it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the exposure can be reasonably estimated. These estimates include several key assumptions, including, but not limited to, the taxability of our products, the jurisdictions in which we believe we have nexus, and the sourcing of revenues to those jurisdictions. In the event these jurisdictions challenge our assumptions and analysis, our actual exposure could differ materially from our current estimates.

We may be subject to scrutiny from state tax authorities in various jurisdictions and may have additional exposure related to our ~~historic~~historical operations. Furthermore, certain jurisdictions in which we do not collect such taxes may assert that such taxes are applicable, which could result in tax assessments, penalties and interest, and we may be required to collect such taxes in the future. Such tax assessments, penalties and interest or future requirements may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Effective March 2017, we began collecting telecommunications-based taxes from our customers in certain jurisdictions. WeSince then, we have added more jurisdictions where we collect these taxes and we expect to ~~begin collecting such~~continue expanding the number of jurisdictions in which we will collect these taxes ~~from~~in the future. Some customers ~~in other jurisdictions. We~~ may ~~have some customers that~~ question the incremental tax charges and some may seek to negotiate lower pricing from us, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our global operations and structure subject us to potentially adverse tax consequences.

We generally conduct our global operations through subsidiaries and report our taxable income in various jurisdictions worldwide based upon our business operations in those jurisdictions. In particular, our intercompany relationships are subject to complex transfer pricing regulations administered by taxing authorities in various jurisdictions. Also, our tax expense could be affected depending on the applicability of withholding and other taxes (including withholding and indirect taxes on software licenses and related intercompany transactions) under the tax laws of certain jurisdictions in which we have business operations. The relevant revenue and taxing authorities may disagree with positions we have taken generally, or our determinations as to the value of assets sold or acquired or income and expenses attributable to specific jurisdictions. If such a disagreement were to occur, and our position were not sustained, we could be required to pay additional taxes, interest and penalties, which could result in one-time tax charges, higher effective tax rates, reduced cash flows and lower overall profitability of our operations.

Certain government agencies in jurisdictions where we and our affiliates do business have had an extended focus on issues related to the taxation of multinational companies. In addition, the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development is conducting a project focused on base erosion and profit shifting in international structures, which seeks to establish certain international standards for taxing the worldwide income of multinational companies. As a result of these developments, the tax laws of certain countries in which we and our affiliates do business could change on a prospective or retroactive basis, and any such changes could increase our liabilities for taxes, interest and penalties, and therefore could harm our business, cash flows, results of operations and financial position.

Changes in the U.S. taxation of international business activities or the adoption of other tax reform policies could materially impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Changes to U.S. tax laws that may be enacted in the future could impact the tax treatment of our foreign earnings. Due to the expansion of our international business activities, any changes in the U.S. taxation of such activities may increase our worldwide effective tax rate and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

If we experience excessive credit card or fraudulent activity, we could incur substantial costs.

Most of our customers authorize us to bill their credit card accounts directly for service fees that we charge. If people pay for our ~~subscriptions~~services with stolen credit cards, we could incur substantial third-party vendor costs for which we may not be reimbursed. Further, our customers provide us with credit card billing information online, and we do not review the physical credit cards used in these transactions, which increases our risk of exposure to fraudulent activity. We also incur charges, which we refer to as chargebacks, from the credit card companies from claims that the customer did not authorize the credit card transaction to purchase our ~~subscription.~~services. If the number of unauthorized credit card transactions becomes excessive, we could be assessed substantial fines for excess chargebacks and we could lose the right to accept credit cards for payment.

Our products may also be subject to fraudulent usage, including but not limited to revenue share fraud, domestic traffic pumping, subscription fraud, premium text message scams and other fraudulent schemes. Although our customers are required to set passwords or personal identification numbers to protect their accounts, third parties have in the past been, and may in the future be, able to access and use their accounts through fraudulent means. Furthermore, spammers attempt to use our products to send targeted and untargeted spam messages. We cannot be certain that our efforts to defeat spamming attacks will be ~~able to eliminate~~successful in eliminating all spam messages from being sent using our platform. In addition, a cybersecurity breach of our customers’ systems could result in exposure of their authentication credentials, unauthorized access to their accounts or fraudulent calls on their accounts, any of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Unfavorable conditions in our industry or the global economy or reductions in spending on information technology and communications could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our results of operations may vary based on the impact of changes in our industry or the global economy on our customers. Our results of operations depend in part on demand for information technology and cloud communications. In addition, our revenue is dependent on the usage of our products, which in turn is influenced by the scale of business that our customers are conducting. To the extent that weak economic conditions result in a reduced volume of business for, and communications by, our customers and prospective customers, demand for, and use of, our products may decline. Furthermore, weak economic conditions may make it more difficult to collect on outstanding accounts receivable. Additionally, historically, we have generated the substantial majority of our revenue from small and medium-sized businesses, and we expect this to continue for the foreseeable future. Small and medium-sized business may be affected by economic downturns to a greater extent than enterprises, and typically have more limited financial resources, including ~~capital-borrowing~~capital borrowing capacity, than enterprises. If our customers reduce their use of our products, or prospective customers delay adoption or elect not to adopt our products, as a result of a weak economy, this could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We may require additional capital to support our business, and this capital might not be available on acceptable terms, if at all.

We intend to continue to make investments to support our business and may require additional funds. In particular, we may seek additional funds to develop new products and enhance our platform and existing products, expand our operations, including our sales and marketing organizations and our presence outside of the United States, improve our infrastructure or acquire complementary businesses, technologies, services, products and other assets. In addition, we may use a portion of our cash to satisfy tax withholding and remittance obligations related to outstanding restricted stock units. Accordingly, we may need to engage in equity or debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise additional funds through future issuances of equity or convertible debt securities, our stockholders could suffer significant dilution, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our Class A and Class B common stock. Any debt financing that we may secure in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities. We may not be able to obtain additional financing on terms favorable to us, if at all. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us when we require it, our ability to continue to support our business growth, scale our infrastructure, develop product enhancements and to respond to business challenges could be significantly impaired, and our business, results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We face exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, and such fluctuations could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

As our international operations expand, our exposure to the effects of fluctuations in currency exchange rates grows. While we have primarily transacted with customers and business partners in U.S. dollars, we have transacted with customers in Japan in Japanese Yen and in Europe in Euros and Swedish ~~Kronas, and~~Kronas. We expect to significantly expand the number of transactions with customers that are denominated in foreign currencies in the future as we continue to expand our business internationally. We also incur expenses for some of our network service provider costs outside of the United States in local currencies and for employee compensation and other operating expenses at our non-U.S. locations in the local currency for such locations. Fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and other currencies could result in an increase to the U.S. dollar equivalent of such expenses.

In addition, our international subsidiaries maintain net assets that are denominated in currencies other than the functional operating currencies of these entities. As we continue to expand our international operations, we become more exposed to the effects of fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Accordingly, changes in the value of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar can affect our results of operations due to transactional and translational remeasurements. As a result of such foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, it could be more difficult to detect underlying trends in our business and results of operations. In addition, to the extent that fluctuations in currency exchange rates cause our results of operations to differ from our expectations or the expectations of our investors and securities analysts who follow our stock, the trading price of our Class A common stock could be adversely affected.

We do not currently maintain a program to hedge transactional exposures in foreign currencies. However, in the future, we may use derivative instruments, such as foreign currency forward and option contracts, to hedge certain exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. The use of such hedging activities may not offset any or more than a portion of the adverse financial effects of unfavorable movements in foreign exchange rates over the limited time the hedges are in place. Moreover, the use of hedging instruments may introduce additional risks if we are unable to structure effective hedges with such instruments.

Our ability to use our net operating losses to offset future taxable income may be subject to certain limitations.

As of December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards ~~or NOLs,~~(“NOLs”), of ~~$104.0~~$229.3 million and ~~$88.7~~$159.6 million, respectively, due to prior period losses. In general, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ~~or the Code,~~(the “Code”), a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” (generally defined as a greater than 50-percentage-point cumulative change (by value) in the equity ownership of certain stockholders over a rolling three-year period) is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change NOLs to offset post-change taxable income. Our existing NOLs may be subject to limitations arising from previous ownership changes, and if we undergo an ownership change in the future, our ability to utilize NOLs could be further limited by Section 382 of the Code. Future changes in our stock ownership, some of which may be outside of our control, could result in an ownership change under Section 382 of the Code. ~~There is~~

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted new tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code including changes to the uses and limitations of net operating losses. For example, while the Tax Act allows for federal net operating losses incurred in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017 to be carried forward indefinitely, the Tax Act also ~~a risk that due to regulatory changes, such as suspensions~~imposes an 80% limitation on the use of ~~NOLs,~~net operating losses that are generated in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. However, net operating losses generated prior to December 31, 2017 will still have a 20-year carryforward period, but are not subject to the 80% limitation. Furthermore, our ability to utilize our net operating losses is conditioned upon our maintaining profitability in the future and generating U.S. federal taxable income. Since we do not know whether or ~~other unforeseen reasons,~~when we will generate the U.S. federal taxable income necessary to utilize our ~~existing NOLs~~remaining net operating losses, these net operating loss carryforwards generated prior to December 31, 2017 could expire ~~or otherwise be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities. For these reasons, we may not be able to realize a tax benefit from the use of our NOLs, even if we attain profitability.~~unused.

If our estimates or judgments relating to our critical accounting policies prove to be incorrect, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, as provided ~~in the section titled~~Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The results of these estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets, liabilities and equity, and the amount of revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Significant assumptions and estimates used in preparing our consolidated financial statements include those related to revenue recognition, ~~capitalized~~capitalization of our internal-use software development costs ~~other non-income taxes, business combination~~ and ~~valuation of goodwill~~accruals and ~~purchased intangible assets and stock-based compensation.~~contingencies. Our results of operations may be adversely affected if our assumptions change or if actual

circumstances differ from those in our assumptions, which could cause our results of operations to fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in the trading price of our Class A common stock.

Changes in financial accounting standards or practices may cause adverse, unexpected financial reporting fluctuations and affect our results of operations.

A change in accounting standards or practices may have a significant effect on our results of operations and may even affect our reporting of transactions completed before the change is effective. New accounting pronouncements and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements have occurred and may occur in the future. Changes to existing rules or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or the way we conduct our business.

For example, a new accounting guidance, Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, became effective on January 1, 2018. We adopted ASC 606 on January 1, 2018, and it resulted in an adjustment of $0.7 million to our opening retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. Although this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, there may be other standards that can become effective in the future that may have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, such as Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-12, “Leases”, which will become effective on January 1, 2019, and will result in a significant gross up of our assets and liabilities.

We have identified a material weakness in our internal controls related to the tracking of qualifying internal use software development costs eligible for capitalization; our failure to remediate the identified deficiency may cause us not to be able to accurately or timely report our financial condition or results of operations. If ~~we fail to maintain an effective system~~one or more of ~~disclosure~~our internal controls ~~and internal control~~ over financial reporting are not effective, it could adversely affect investor confidence in us and our ~~ability to produce timely and accurate financial statements~~reputation, business or ~~comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.~~stock price.

In reviewing the accounting for our software development activities, our management has concluded that our internal controls did not effectively track and categorize software development costs between period expenses and capitalization as a fixed asset in accordance with U.S. GAAP. As ~~a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements~~described under Part II, Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures,” of ~~the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and the rules and regulations of the applicable listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. We expect~~our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, our management has concluded that the requirements of these rules and regulations will continue to increase our legal, accounting, and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly and place significant strain on our personnel, systems and resources.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Our disclosure controls and other procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by usidentified deficiencies constitute a material weakness in the reports that we will file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed in reports under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive and financial officers, and we continue to evaluate how to improve controls. We are also continuing to improve our internal control over financial reporting. ~~In order to maintain~~As of June 30, 2018, we have not yet remediated this material weakness. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our management has concluded that the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and ~~improve~~cash flows for the ~~effectiveness~~periods presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q in conformity with GAAP.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of ~~our disclosure controls and procedures and~~deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Although we ~~have expended,~~plan to remediate the identified deficiencies as quickly as possible, we cannot, at this time, estimate when such remediation may occur, and ~~anticipate~~our initiatives may not prove successful.

We cannot guarantee that we will ~~continue to expend, significant resources, including accounting-related costs and significant management oversight.~~

~~Our current controls and any new controls that we develop may become inadequate because of changes~~not identify additional deficiencies in conditions in our business. Further, weaknesses in our disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting may be discovered in the future. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement could harm our results of operations or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result in a restatement of our financial statements for prior periods. Any failure to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting also could adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations and annual independent registered public accounting firm attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting ~~that we will eventually be required to include~~ in ~~our periodic reports that will be filed with~~ the SEC. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of our Class A common stock. In addition, iffuture. If we are unable to ~~continue~~remediate the deficiencies or identify additional deficiencies in the future, our ability to ~~meet these requirements, we may not be able~~record, process and report financial information accurately, and to ~~remain listed on~~prepare financial statements within the ~~New York Stock Exchange. We are not currently required to comply with~~time periods specified by the rules and forms of the SEC, ~~rules that implement Section 404~~could be adversely affected. The occurrence of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and are therefore not required to make a formal assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for that purpose. As a public company, we are required to provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting commencing with our second Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to formally attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting until after we are no longer an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. At such time, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event it is not satisfied with the level at which our internal control over financial reporting is documented, designed or ~~operating. Any~~ failure to ~~maintain effective disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting could have~~remediate a material weakness may adversely affect our reputation and ~~adverse effect on our~~ business ~~results of operations~~ and ~~financial condition and could cause a decline in~~ the ~~trading~~market price of our ~~Class A~~ common ~~stock.~~stock and any other securities we may issue.

If our goodwill or intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings.

We review our intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at least annually. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we carried a net ~~$36.7~~$32.3 million of goodwill and intangible assets related to acquired businesses. An adverse change in market conditions, particularly if such change has the effect of changing one of our critical assumptions or estimates, could result in a change to the estimation of fair value that could result in an impairment charge to our goodwill or intangible assets. Any such charges may adversely affect our results of operations.

We are an “emerging growth company” and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our Class A common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies,” including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We may take advantage of these exemptions for so long as we are an “emerging growth company.” We will cease to be an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, at the end of this fiscal year. We cannot predict if investors will find our Class A common stock less attractive because we will rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Class A common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Class A common stock and the trading price of our Class A common stock may be more volatile.

Our business is subject to the risks of earthquakes, fire, floods and other natural catastrophic events, and to interruption by man-made problems such as power disruptions, computer viruses, data security breaches or terrorism.

Our corporate headquarters are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, a region known for seismic activity. A significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake, fire or a flood, occurring at our headquarters, at one of our other facilities or where a business partner is located could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Further, if a natural disaster or man-made problem were to affect our network service providers or Internet service providers, this could adversely affect the ability of

our customers to use our products and platform. In addition, natural disasters and acts of terrorism could cause disruptions in our or our customers’ businesses, national economies or the world economy as a whole. We also rely on our network and third-party infrastructure and enterprise applications and internal technology systems for our engineering, sales and marketing, and operations activities. Although we maintain incident management and disaster response plans, in the event of a major disruption caused by a natural disaster or man-made problem, we may be unable to continue our operations and may endure system interruptions, reputational harm, delays in our development activities, lengthy interruptions in service, breaches of data security and loss of critical data, any of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

In addition, computer malware, viruses and computer hacking, fraudulent use attempts and phishing attacks have become more prevalent in our industry, have occurred on our platform in the past and may occur on our platform in the future. Though it is difficult to determine what, if any, harm may directly result from any specific interruption or attack, any failure to maintain performance, reliability, security and availability of our products and technical infrastructure to the satisfaction of our users may harm our reputation and our ability to retain existing users and attract new users.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our ~~Class~~ Class��A Common Stock

The trading price of our Class A common stock has been volatile and may continue to be volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Prior to our initial public offering in June 2016, there was no public market for shares of our Class A common stock. On June 23, 2016, we sold shares of our Class A common stock to the public at $15.00 per share. From June 23, 2016, the date that our Class A common stock started trading on the New York Stock Exchange, through ~~October~~July 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the trading price of our Class A common stock has ranged from $22.80 per share to $70.96 per share. The trading price of our Class A common stock may continue to fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

· price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;

· volatility in the trading prices and trading volumes of technology stocks;

· changes in operating performance and stock market valuations of other technology companies generally, or those in our industry in particular;

· sales of shares of our Class A common stock by us or our stockholders;

· failure of securities analysts to maintain coverage of us, changes in financial estimates by securities analysts who follow our company, or our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors;

· the financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in those projections or our failure to meet those projections;

· announcements by us or our competitors of new products or services;

· the public’s reaction to our press releases, other public announcements and filings with the SEC;

· rumors and market speculation involving us or other companies in our industry;

· actual or anticipated changes in our results of operations or fluctuations in our results of operations;

· actual or anticipated developments in our business, our competitors’ businesses or the competitive landscape generally;

· litigation involving us, our industry or both, or investigations by regulators into our operations or those of our competitors;

· developments or disputes concerning our intellectual property or other proprietary rights;

· announced or completed acquisitions of businesses, products, services or technologies by us or our competitors;

· new laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations applicable to our business;

· changes in accounting standards, policies, guidelines, interpretations or principles;

· any significant change in our management; and

· general economic conditions and slow or negative growth of our markets.

In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a particular company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

Substantial future sales of shares of our Class A common stock could cause the market price of our Class A common stock to decline.

The market price of our Class A common stock could decline as a result of substantial sales of our Class A common stock, particularly sales by our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders, or the perception in the market that holders of a large number of shares intend to sell their shares.

Additionally, the shares of Class A common stock subject to outstanding options and restricted stock unit awards under our equity incentive plans and the shares reserved for future issuance under our equity incentive plans will become eligible for sale in the public market upon ~~issuance.~~issuance, subject to applicable insider trading policies. Certain holders of our Class A common stock have rights, subject to some conditions, to require us to file registration statements covering their shares or to include their shares in registration statements that we may file for our stockholders or ourselves.

The dual class structure of our common stock has the effect of concentrating voting control with those stockholders who held our capital stock prior to the completion of our initial public offering, including our directors, executive officers and ~~significant stockholders and~~ their respective ~~affiliates who held in the aggregate 56.1% of the voting power of our capital stock as of September 30, 2017.~~affiliates. This limits or precludes your ability to influence corporate matters, including the election of directors, amendments of our organizational documents and any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or other major corporate transaction requiring stockholder approval.

Our Class B common stock has 10 votes per share, and our Class A common stock has one vote per share. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, our directors, executive officers and ~~holders of more than 5% of our common stock, and~~ their respective affiliates, ~~hold~~held in the aggregate ~~56.1%~~47.2% of the voting power of our capital stock. Because of the 10-to-one voting ratio between our Class B common stock and Class A common stock, the holders of our Class B common stock collectively will continue to control a majority of the combined voting power of our common stock and therefore be able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval until the earlier of (i) June ~~22,~~28, 2023, or (ii) the date the holders of two-thirds of our Class B common stock elect to convert the Class B common stock to Class A common stock. This concentrated control limits or precludes your ability to influence corporate matters for the foreseeable future, including the election of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, and any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, or other major corporate transaction requiring stockholder approval. In addition, this may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our capital stock that you may feel are in your best interest as one of our stockholders.

Future transfers by holders of Class B common stock will generally result in those shares converting to Class A common stock, subject to limited exceptions, such as certain transfers effected for estate planning purposes. The conversion of Class B common stock to Class A common stock will have the effect, over time, of increasing the relative voting power of those holders of Class B common stock who retain their shares in the long term.

If securities or industry analysts cease publishing research or reports about us, our business or our market, or if they change their recommendations regarding our Class A common stock adversely, the trading price of our Class A common stock and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our Class A common stock is influenced by the research and reports that securities or industry analysts may publish about us, our business, our market or our competitors. If any of the analysts who cover us change their recommendation regarding our Class A common stock adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about our competitors, the trading price of our Class A common stock would likely decline. If any analyst who covers us were to cease coverage of our company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which in turn could cause the trading price of our Class A common stock or trading volume to decline.

Anti-takeover provisions contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could impair a takeover attempt.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions which could have the effect of rendering more difficult, delaying, or preventing an acquisition deemed undesirable by our board of directors. Among other things, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws include provisions:

· authorizing “blank check” preferred stock, which could be issued by our board of directors without stockholder approval and may contain voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to our Class A and Class B common stock;

· limiting the liability of, and providing indemnification to, our directors and officers;

· limiting the ability of our stockholders to call and bring business before special meetings;

· providing for a dual class common stock structure in which holders of our Class B common stock have the ability to control the outcome of matters requiring stockholder approval, even if they own significantly less than a majority of the outstanding shares of our Class A and Class B common stock, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our company or its assets;

· providing that our board of directors is classified into three classes of directors with staggered three-year terms;

· prohibit stockholder action by written consent, which requires all stockholder actions to be taken at a meeting of our stockholders;

· requiring advance notice of stockholder proposals for business to be conducted at meetings of our stockholders and for nominations of candidates for election to our board of directors; and

· controlling the procedures for the conduct and scheduling of board of directors and stockholder meetings.

These provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control or changes in our management.

As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation law, which prevents certain stockholders holding more than 15% of our outstanding common stock from engaging in certain business combinations without approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of our outstanding common stock not held by such 15% or greater stockholder.

Any provision of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our Class A common stock.

We do not expect to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future.

We do not anticipate declaring any cash dividends to holders of our common stock in the foreseeable future. Consequently, investors may need to rely on sales of their Class A common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investment. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our Class A common stock.

Risks Related to the Outstanding Notes

Servicing our future debt may require a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to pay our indebtedness.

Our ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, to pay interest on or to refinance our indebtedness, including the Notes, depends on our future performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. Our business may not generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures. If we are unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as

selling assets, restructuring debt or obtaining additional debt financing or equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. Our ability to refinance any future indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our debt obligations. In addition, any of our ~~credit facility contains restrictions~~future debt agreements may contain restrictive covenants that may prohibit us from adopting any of these alternatives. Our failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of our debt.

We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary for cash settlement upon conversion of the Notes or to repurchase the Notes for cash upon a fundamental change, and our future debt may contain limitations on our ability to pay ~~dividends.~~cash upon conversion of the Notes or to repurchase the Notes.

Subject to limited exceptions, holders of the Notes have the right to require us to repurchase their Notes upon the occurrence of a fundamental change at a fundamental change repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes to be repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the fundamental change repurchase date. In addition, upon conversion of the Notes, unless we elect to deliver solely shares of our Class A common stock to settle such conversion (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), we will be required to make cash payments in respect of the Notes being converted. However, we may not have enough available cash or be able to obtain financing at the time we are required to make repurchases of Notes surrendered therefor or pay any cash amounts due upon conversion. In addition, our ability to repurchase the Notes or to pay cash upon conversions of the Notes may be limited by law, by regulatory authority or by agreements governing our future indebtedness. Our failure to repurchase Notes at a time when the repurchase is required by the indenture governing the Notes or to pay any cash payable on future conversions of the Notes as required by such indenture would constitute a default under such indenture. A default under the indenture or the fundamental change itself could also lead to a default under agreements governing our future indebtedness. If the repayment of the related indebtedness were to be accelerated after any applicable notice or grace periods, we may not have sufficient funds to repay the indebtedness and repurchase the Notes or make cash payments upon conversions thereof.

The conditional conversion feature of the Notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

In the event the conditional conversion feature of the Notes is triggered, holders of Notes will be entitled to convert the Notes at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more holders elect to convert their Notes, unless we elect to satisfy our conversion obligation by delivering solely shares of our Class A common stock (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), we would be required to settle a portion or all of our conversion obligation through the payment of cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, even if holders do not elect to convert their Notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the Notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital.

The accounting method for convertible debt securities that may be settled in cash, such as the Notes, could have a material effect on our reported financial results.

Under Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options, which we refer to as ASC 470-20, an entity must separately account for the liability and equity components of convertible debt instruments (such as the Notes) that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion in a manner that reflects the issuer’s economic interest cost. ASC 470-20 requires the value of the conversion option of the Notes, representing the equity component, to be recorded as additional paid-in capital within stockholders’ equity in our consolidated balance sheet and as a discount to the debt component of the Notes, which reduces their initial debt carrying value reflected as a liability on our balance sheets. The carrying value of the debt component of the Notes, net of the discount recorded, will be accreted up to the principal amount of the Notes from the issuance date until maturity, which will result in non-cash charges to interest expense in our consolidated statement of operations. Accordingly, we will report lower net income or higher net loss in our financial results because ASC 470-20 requires interest to include both the current period’s accretion of the debt discount and the instrument’s coupon interest, which could adversely affect our reported or future financial results, the trading price of our Class A common stock and the trading price of the Notes.

In addition, under certain circumstances, convertible debt instruments (such as the Notes) that may be settled entirely or partly in cash are currently accounted for utilizing the treasury stock method, the effect of which is that the shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share except to the extent that the conversion value of the Notes exceeds their principal amount. Under the treasury stock method, for diluted earnings per share purposes, the transaction is accounted for as if the number of shares of Class A common stock that would be necessary to settle such excess, if we elected to settle such excess in shares, are issued. We cannot be sure that the accounting standards in the future will continue to permit the use of the treasury stock method. If we are unable to use the treasury stock method in accounting for the shares issuable

upon conversion of the Notes, then our diluted earnings per share would be adversely affected in periods when we report net income.

The capped call transactions may affect the value of the Notes and our Class A common stock.

In connection with the pricing of the Notes, we entered into privately negotiated capped call transactions with the option counterparties. The capped call transactions are expected generally to reduce the potential dilution to our Class A common stock upon any conversion of the Notes and/or offset any potential cash payments we are required to make in excess of the principal amount of converted Notes, as the case may be, with such reduction and/or offset subject to a cap.

In connection with establishing their initial hedges of the capped call transactions, the option counterparties or their respective affiliates entered into various derivative transactions with respect to our Class A common stock and/or purchased shares of our Class A common stock concurrently with or shortly after the pricing of the Notes.

In addition, the option counterparties and/or their respective affiliates may modify their hedge positions by entering into or unwinding various derivatives with respect to our Class A common stock and/or purchasing or selling our Class A common stock or other securities of ours in secondary market transactions at any time prior to the maturity of the Notes (and are likely to do so during any observation period related to a conversion of Notes). This activity could cause or avoid an increase or a decrease in the market price of our Class A common stock.

We do not make any representation or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any potential effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of the Notes or our Class A common stock. In addition, we do not make any representation that the option counterparties will engage in these transactions or that these transactions, once commenced, will not be discontinued without notice.

We are subject to counterparty risk with respect to the capped call transactions.

The option counterparties are financial institutions, and we will be subject to the risk that any or all of them might default under the capped call transactions. Our exposure to the credit risk of the option counterparties will not be secured by any collateral. Past global economic conditions have resulted in the actual or perceived failure or financial difficulties of many financial institutions. If an option counterparty becomes subject to insolvency proceedings, we will become an unsecured creditor in those proceedings with a claim equal to our exposure at that time under the capped call transactions with such option counterparty. Our exposure will depend on many factors but, generally, an increase in our exposure will be correlated to an increase in the market price and in the volatility of our Class A common stock. In addition, upon a default by an option counterparty, we may suffer adverse tax consequences and more dilution than we currently anticipate with respect to our Class A common stock. We can provide no assurances as to the financial stability or viability of the option counterparties.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities

~~None.~~

~~Use~~In May 2018, we issued and sold $550.0 million aggregate principal amount of ~~Proceeds~~0.25% convertible senior notes due 2023 in a private placement exempt from ~~Public Offering~~the registration requirements of ~~Class A Common Stock~~

In June 2016, we closed our initial public offering (“IPO”), in which we sold 11,500,000 shares of Class A common stock at a price to the public of $15.00 per share, including shares sold in connection with the exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares. The offer and sale of all of the shares in the IPO were registered under the Securities Act ~~pursuant to a registration statement~~of 1933, as amended. Additional disclosure concerning this issuance can be found in our Current Report on Form S-1 (File No. 333-211634), which was declared effective by the SEC on June 22, 2016. We raised $155.5 million in net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $12.1 million and offering expenses of $4.9 million. No payments were made by us to directors, officers or persons owning 10 percent or more of our capital stock or to their associates, or to our affiliates, other than payments in the ordinary course of business to officers for salaries. There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our IPO as described in our final prospectus8-K filed with the SEC on June 23, 2016 pursuant to Rule 424(b). We invested the funds received in accordance with our board-approved investment policy, which provides for investments in obligations of the U.S. government, money market instruments, registered money market funds and corporate bonds. The managing underwriters of our IPO were Goldman, Sachs & Co. and J.P. MorganMay 18, 2018.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities ~~LLC.~~

Not applicable

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable

In October 2016, we closed our follow-on public offering, in which we sold 1,691,222 shares of Class A common stock at a price to the public of $40.00 per share, including shares sold in connection with the exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares. The offer and sale of all of the shares in the follow-on offering were registered under the Securities Act pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-214034), which was declared effective by the SEC on October 20, 2016. We raised $64.4 million in net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses paid and payable by us. No payments were made by us to directors, officers or persons owning 10 percent or more of our capital stock or to their associates, or to our affiliates, other than payments in the ordinary course of business to officers for salaries. There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our follow-on offering as described in our final prospectus filed with the SEC on October 21, 2016 pursuant to Rule 424(b). We invested the funds received in accordance with our board-approved investment policy, which provides for investments in obligations of the U.S. government, money market instruments, registered money market funds and corporate bonds. The managing underwriters of our follow-on offering were Goldman, Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC.

Item 6. Exhibits

The documents listed in the Exhibit Index of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are incorporated by reference or are filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, in each case as indicated therein.

EXHIBIT INDEX

~~Exhibit~~
~~Number~~	~~Description~~	~~Filing Date~~

~~31.1~~	~~Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~	~~Filed herewith~~

~~31.2~~	~~Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~	~~Filed herewith~~

32.1*	~~Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~	~~Furnished herewith~~

~~101.INS~~	~~XBRL Instance Document.~~	~~Filed herewith~~

~~101.SCH~~	~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.~~	~~Filed herewith~~

~~101.CAL~~	~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.~~	~~Filed herewith~~

~~101.DEF~~	~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.~~	~~Filed herewith~~

~~101.LAB~~	~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.~~	~~Filed herewith~~

~~101.PRE~~	~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.~~	~~Filed herewith~~

Exhibit
Number	Description	Form	File No.	Exhibit	Filing Date

4.1	Indenture, dated as of May 17, 2018, between Twilio Inc. and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee	8-K	001-37806	4.1	May 18, 2018
4.2	Form of 0.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 (included in Exhibit 4.1)	8-K	001-37806	4.2	May 18, 2018
10.1	Form of Capped Call Confirmation	8-K	001-37806	10.1	May 18, 2018
31.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				Filed herewith
31.2	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				Filed herewith
32.1*	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002				Furnished herewith
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.				Filed herewith
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.				Filed herewith
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.				Filed herewith
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.				Filed herewith
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.				Filed herewith
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.				Filed herewith

* The certifications furnished in Exhibit 32.1 hereto are deemed to accompany this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Twilio Inc.

Date: ~~November 13, 2017~~	August 8, 2018	/s/ JEFFREY LAWSON
		Jeffrey Lawson
		~~Chief Executive Officer~~
		~~(Principal~~Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: ~~November 13, 2017~~	August 8, 2018	/s/ LEE KIRKPATRICK
		Lee Kirkpatrick
		~~Chief Financial Officer~~
		~~(Principal~~Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

6772

Delaware		26-2574840
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

Large accelerated filer ox		Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer xo		Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Emerging growth company xo

	Amortized Cost or Carrying		Net Unrealized			Fair Value Hierarchy as of September 30, 2017						Aggregate Fair
	Value		Losses			Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Value
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	90,144	$	—		$	90,144	$	—	$	—	$	90,144
Total included in cash and cash equivalents	90,144		—			90,144		—		—		90,144
Marketable securities:
U.S. Treasury securities	59,951		(125		)	59,826		—		—		59,826
Corporate debt securities	132,318		(113		)	—		132,205		—		132,205
Total marketable securities	192,269		(238		)	59,826		132,205		—		192,031
Total financial assets	$	282,413	$	(238	)	$	149,970	$	132,205	$	—	$	282,175

	Carrying		Fair Value Hierarchy as of December 31, 2016						Aggregate Fair
	Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Value Total
Financial Assets:
Money market funds (included in cash and cash equivalents)	$	274,135	$	274,135	$	—	$	—	$	274,135
Total financial assets	$	274,135	$	274,135	$	—	$	—	$	274,135

	Amortized		Aggregate Fair
	Cost		Value
Financial Assets:
Less than one year	$	121,215	$	121,130
One to two years	71,054		70,901
Total	$	192,269	$	192,031

	Total
Net tangible liabilities	$	(3,326	)
Goodwill(1)	12,588
Intangible assets(2)	13,700
Total purchase price	$	22,962

	Total
Balance as of December 31, 2016	$	3,565
Goodwill recorded in connection with the recent acquisition	12,688
Measurement period adjustment	(100		)
Effect of exchange rate	1,254
Balance as of September 30, 2017	$	17,407

	As of September 30,
	2017	2016

Issued and outstanding options	11,380,189	16,476,973
Nonvested RSUs issued and outstanding	4,384,898	1,639,378
Common stock reserved for Twilio.org	680,397	780,397
Shares committed under 2016 ESPP	224,126	604,865
Unvested shares subject to repurchase	16,033	74,451
Total	16,685,643	19,576,064

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
	(In thousands)
Cost of revenue	$	180	$	84	$	460	$	135
Research and development	6,493		3,741		16,687		7,636
Sales and marketing	2,603		1,432		6,961		3,282
General and administrative	4,912		2,391		11,865		4,596
Total	$	14,188	$	7,648	$	35,973	$	15,649

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016

Cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(7,054	)	$	4,419
Cash used in investing activities	(235,795		)	(21,814		)
Cash provided by financing activities	29,002			160,785
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	88			—
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	(213,759	)	$	143,390