UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31,September 30, 2003
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______ to ______
Commission file number: 000-21724
-------------------------------------
FUEL-TECH N.V.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Netherlands Antilles N.A.
-------------------- ------------------------------------- ----
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
Fuel-Tech N.V. Fuel Tech, Inc.
(Registrant) (U.S. Operating Subsidiary)
Castorweg 22-24 Suite 703, 300 Atlantic Street
Curacao, Netherlands Antilles Stamford, CT 06901
(599) 9-461-3754 (203) 425-9830
(Address and telephone number of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes X No
--- ----- --
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).
Yes X No
--- ----- --
As of May 1,October 24, 2003, there were outstanding 19,683,64219,895,503 shares of Common
Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the registrant.
===========================================================================
FUEL-TECH N.V.
Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31,September 30, 2003
INDEX
Page
----
Page
----
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2003 1
and December 31, 2002
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and 2
Nine Month Periods Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine 3
Month Periods Ended September 30, 2003 and 2002
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 4
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of 9
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 12
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 12
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 13
Item 2. Changes in Securities 13
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities 13
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 13
Item 5. Other Information 13
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 13
SIGNATURES 14
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2003 1
and December 31, 2002
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three 2
Month Periods Ended March 31, 2003 and 2002
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three 3
Month Periods Ended March 31, 2003 and 2002
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 4
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of 9
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 11
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 11
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 12
Item 2. Changes in Securities 12
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities 12
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 12
Item 5. Other Information 12
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 12
SIGNATURES AND CERTIFICATIONS 13
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
FUEL-TECH N.V.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
March 31,
September 30, December 31,
2003 2002
--------------- -----------------------------
(Unaudited)
AssetsASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,3285,791 $ 10,939
Accounts receivable, net 8,496net. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,661 8,849
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1,267. . . . . . . . . 1,456 1,164
--------------- -----------------------------
Total current assets 18,091assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,908 20,952
Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$5,3365,867 and $5,118, respectively 2,223. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,182 2,123
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $924 2,119 2,119
Other 675intangible assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,298 -
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 673 675
--------------- -----------------------------
Total assetsassets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 23,10823,180 $ 25,869
=============== ===============
Liabilities and stockholders' equity==============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable 3,649payable. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2,684 $ 5,065
Accrued expenses 1,260expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,733 1,940
--------------- -----------------------------
Total current liabilities 4,909. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,417 7,005
Long-term debt 1,575debt. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 1,800
Other liabilities 257. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260 259
--------------- -----------------------------
Total liabilities 6,741. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,677 9,064
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
authorized 40,000,000 shares, 19,683,64219,895,503
and 19,613,817 shares issued, respectively 197respectively. . . . . . . . 199 196
Additional paid-in capital 90,424capital. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,636 90,315
Accumulated deficit (73,669). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (71,753) (73,150)
Accumulated other comprehensive income 16income. . . . . . . . . . . 22 10
Treasury stockstock. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,133) (1,098)
Nil coupon perpetual loan notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 532 532
--------------- -----------------------------
Total stockholders' equity 16,367equity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,503 16,805
--------------- -----------------------------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equityequity. . . . . . . . . $ 23,10823,180 $ 25,869
=============== ===============
==============
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
FUEL-TECH N.V.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data)
Three Months Ended March 31Nine Months Ended
September 30 September 30
2003 2002 ---------- --------
2003 2002
--------------- -------------- ------------ ------------
Net sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,03610,178 $ 5,2218,033 $ 28,182 $ 21,275
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales 5,409 2,583. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,592 4,462 17,412 11,175
Selling, general and administrative 2,854 2,355. . . . . . . . . . . 2,961 2,717 8,565 7,725
Research and development 311 293
---------- --------development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314 394 920 1,041
--------------- -------------- ------------ ------------
Operating loss (538) (10)
Incomeincome. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,311 460 1,285 1,334
(Loss) income from equity interest in affiliatesaffiliates. . . . . - 238(27) - 196
Interest expense (16) (43)expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (37) (25) (114)
Other income, net 37 77
---------- --------
(Loss) income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 (17) 140 254
--------------- -------------- ------------ ------------
Income before taxes (517) 262. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,317 379 1,400 1,670
Income tax benefittaxes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - - 50
---------- ----------------------- -------------- ------------ ------------
Net (loss) incomeincome. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (517)1,317 $ 312
========== ========379 $ 1,400 $ 1,720
=============== ============== ============ ============
Net (loss) income per common share:
BasicBasic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (.03).07 $ .02 ========== ========
Diluted $ (.03).07 $ .01
========== ========.09
=============== ============== ============ ============
Diluted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ .06 $ .02 $ .06 $ .08
=============== ============== ============ ============
Average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic 19,552,000 19,177,000
========== ==========
Diluted 19,552,000 22,632,000
========== ==========
Basic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,744,000 19,454,000 19,629,000 19,299,000
=============== ============== ============ ============
Diluted. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,748,000 22,422,000 22,325,000 22,565,000
=============== ============== ============ ============
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
FUEL-TECH N.V.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands of U.S. dollars)
Three Months Ended
March 31
2003 2002
-----------------------------
Operating activitiesNine Months Ended
September 30
2003 2002
--------- --------
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net cash used in
operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (2,137)(1,520) $ (195)
------------- ------------
Investing activities(298)
--------- --------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Repayment from affiliateaffiliate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 250
Proceeds from sale of equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 17
Acquisition of fuel additive business . . . . . . . . . . (1,348) -
Purchases of equipment and patents (328) (277)
------------- ------------patents. . . . . . . . . . . . (780) (1,026)
--------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities (328) (10)
------------- ------------
Financing activities. . . . . . . . . . (2,128) (759)
--------- --------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Exercise of stock options 108 230. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323 530
Purchase of treasury shares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (35) -
Repayment of borrowings (225) (225)
------------- ------------. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,800) (675)
Net cash (used in) provided byused in --------- --------
financing activities (152) 5
------------- ------------. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,512) (145)
--------- --------
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash 6 2
------------- ------------
Net decrease in cash and
cash equivalents (2,611) (198)cash. . . . . . . 12 33
--------- --------
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5,148) (1,169)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning
of periodperiod. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,939 9,338
------------- ------------
Cash and cash equivalents at
end of period--------- --------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT
END OF PERIOD. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,3285,791 $ 9,140
============= ============
8,169
========= ========
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
FUEL-TECH N.V.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
March 31,September 30, 2003
(Unaudited)
NoteNOTE A: Basis of PresentationBASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited, condensed, consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair
presentation of the results of operations for the periods covered have been
included. Operating results for the three-monthnine-month period ended March 31,September 30, 2003,
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2003.
The balance sheet at December 31, 2002, has been derived from the audited
financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information
and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete
financial statements.
For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in Fuel-Tech N.V.'s annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002.
Fuel-Tech N.V. through its subsidiaries (the "Company"), is a technology
company active in the business of air pollution control. The Company,
incorporated in 1987 under the laws of the Netherlands Antilles, is registered
at Castorweg 22--24 in Curacao under No. 1334/N.V.
4
NoteNOTE B: Earnings Per Share DataEARNINGS PER SHARE DATA
Basic earnings per share excludes the dilutive effects of stock options and
warrants and of the nil coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes.
Diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of stock options and
warrants and of the nil coupon non-redeemable convertible unsecured loan notes for the three-month period ended March 31, 2002. Such amounts have been
excluded for the three months ended March 31, 2003 as they are antidilutive due
to the net loss for the three months.notes.
The following table sets forth the weighted-average shares (in thousands) used
in calculating the earnings per share for the three-monththree and nine-month periods ended
March 31,September 30, 2003 and 2002:
Three months ended
2003 2002
---------------------
Basic weighted-average shares 19,552 19,177
Conversion of unsecured loan notes - 86
Unexercised options and warrants - 3,369
---------------------
Diluted weighted-average shares 19,552 22,632
=====================
Note
Three months ended Nine months ended
2003 2002 2003 2002
---------- --------- -------- ---------
Basic weighted-average shares 19,744 19,454 19,629 19,299
Conversion of unsecured loan notes 85 85 85 85
Unexercised options and warrants 2,919 2,883 2,611 3,181
---------- --------- -------- ---------
Diluted weighted-average shares 22,748 22,422 22,325 22,565
========== ========= ======== =========
NOTE C: Total Comprehensive (Loss) IncomeTOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Total comprehensive (loss) income for the Company is comprised of net (loss) income, the
impact of foreign currency translation, and in 2002, the change in fair value of
the interest rate swapswap. Total comprehensive income was $1,331,000 and $385,000
for the three-month periods ended March 31,
2003 and 2002. Total comprehensive (loss) income was $(511,000) and $328,000 for
the three-month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
ForTotal comprehensive income was $1,412,000 and $1,790,000 for the three monthsnine-month
periods ended March 31
--------------------------------------September 30, 2003 and 2002, -------------- --------------
Comprehensive (loss) income:
Net (loss) income $ (517,000) $ 312,000
Foreign currency translation 6,000 2,000
Change in fair value of interest
rate swap - 14,000
-------------- --------------
$ (511,000) $ 328,000
============== ==============
5
Noterespectively.
For the three months ended For the nine months ended
September 30 September 30
-------------------------- -------------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
Comprehensive income:
Net income $ 1,317,000 $ 379,000 $1,400,000 $ 1,720,000
Foreign currency translation 14,000 (6,000) 12,000 32,000
Change in fair value of interest rate swap - 12,000 - 38,000
----------- ------------- ---------- -----------
$ 1,331,000 $ 385,000 $1,412,000 $ 1,790,000
=========== ============= ========== ===========
NOTE D: Derivative Financial Instruments
Interest Rate Risk Management:
The Company is exposed to interest rate risk due to its long-term debt
arrangement. The Company does not currently use any derivative instruments to
manage exposure to interest rate changes.DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
Foreign Currency Risk Management:
The Company's earnings and cash flow are subject to fluctuations due to
changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company does not enter into
foreign currency forward contracts or into foreign currency option contracts to
manage this risk due to the immaterial nature of the transactions involved.
6
NoteNOTE E: Stock-Based CompensationSTOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Fuel Tech accounts for stock option grants in accordance with Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees." Under Fuel Tech's current plans,plan, options may be granted at not less
than the fair market value on the date of grant, and therefore, no compensation
expense is recognized for the stock options granted.
If compensation expense for Fuel Tech's plans had been determined based on
the fair value at the grant dates for awards under its plans, consistent with
the method described in SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,"
Fuel Tech's net income (loss) and income (loss) per share would have been
adjusted as follows for the three-monththree and nine-month periods ended March 31,September 30,
2003 and 2002:
---------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------- ------------------
(in thousands) 2003 2002
---------------------------- ---------------------------- ----------------- ------------------
For the three months For the nine months
(in thousands) ended September 30 ended September 30
2003 2002 2003 2002
-------------------------------------------
Net income (loss)
As reported $(517) $312. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1,317 $ 379 $1,400 $1,720
As adjusted (673) 164. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,172 186 833 946
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share:
Basic - as reported $(.03) $.02. . . . . . . . . . . $ .07 $ .02 $ .07 $ .09
Basic - as adjusted $(.03) $.01. . . . . . . . . . . $ .06 $ .01 $ .04 $ .05
Diluted - as reported $(.03) $.01. . . . . . . . . . $ .06 $ .02 $ .06 $ .08
Diluted - as adjusted $(.03) $.01. . . . . . . . . . $ .05 $ .01 $ .04 $ .04
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, the "As adjusted"
disclosures include only the effect of stock options granted after 1994. The
application of the "As adjusted" disclosures presented above are not
representative of the effects SFAS No. 123 may have on such operating results in
future years due to the timing of stock option grants and considering that
options vest over a period of immediately to five years.
NoteNOTE F: DebtDEBT
Fuel Tech, Inc. (FTI) has a $10.0 million revolving credit facility
expiring July 31, 2004, which is collateralized by all personal property owned
by FTI. FTI can use this facility for cash advances and standby letters of
credit. Cash advances under this facility bear interest at the bank's prime
rate, or at an optional rate that can be selected by FTI which is based on the
bank's Interbank Offering Rate plus 2.25%.
TheDuring the quarter ended June 30, 2003, FTI repaid all outstanding
borrowings under this facility
are collateralized by all personal property owned by FTI.
FTI also had a term loan agreement with the same bank for a total
principal balance of $4.5 million. The principal balance was to be repaid in
quarterly installments of $225,000 commencing on December 31, 1999, with a final
principal payment of $1,575,000 due on January 31, 2003. Further, FTI entered
into an interest rate swap transaction that fixed the rate of interest at 8.91%
on approximately 50% of the outstanding principal balance during the term of the
loan. This swap expired on October 22, 2002. The remaining principal balance
bore interest at the bank's prime rate, or an optional rate that can be selected
by FTI, and was based on the bank's Interbank Offering Rate plus 2.25%. The
borrowings under this facility were collateralized by all personal property
owned by FTI.
The $10.0 million revolving credit facility was obtained via an
amendment, effective December 31, 2002, that increased the then existing credit
facility from $6.0 million to $10.0 million and extended the agreement until
July 31, 2004. The term loan was paid in full on January 31, 2003 using proceeds
from the line of credit.
7
Notefacility.
NOTE G: Business Segment and Geographic DisclosuresBUSINESS SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC DISCLOSURES
The Company operates in one business segment providing air pollution
controltechnology
solutions, including equipment and specialty chemicals, to operators of utility
and equipment.industrial boilers that improve boiler performance and reduce emissions of
nitrogen oxides.
Information concerning the Company's operations by geographic area is
provided below. Operating earnings representincome (loss) represents sales less cost of products
sold and operating expenses. Foreign operating expenses include direct expenses
incurred outside of the United States by foreign corporations controlled by the
Company plus an allocation of selling and general expenses incurred in the
United States that are directly related to the foreign operations. Assets are
those directly associated with operations in the geographic area.
For the three months ended For the nine months ended
September 30 September 30
-------------------------- -------------------------
2003 2002 2003 2002
------------- ----------- ----------- ------------
Revenues:
United States. . . . . . $ 8,924,000 $ 7,176,000 $24,782,000 $19,154,000
Foreign. . . . . . . . . 1,254,000 857,000 3,400,000 2,121,000
------------- ------------ ------------ -----------
$ 10,178,000 $ 8,033,000 $28,182,000 $21,275,000
============= ============ ============ ===========
Operating income (loss):
United States. . . . . . $ 1,171,000 $ 517,000 $ 1,268,000 $1,558,000
Foreign. . . . . . . . . 140,000 (57,000) 17,000 (224,000)
------------ ------------ ------------ -----------
$ 1,311,000 $ 460,000 $ 1,285,000 $1,334,000
============= ============ ============ ===========
September 30, December 31,
2003 2002
Assets:
United States. . . . . . $ 21,455,000 $ 24,393,000
Foreign. . . . . . . . . 1,725,000 1,476,000
------------- -------------
$ 23,180,000 $ 25,869,000
============= ============
NOTE H: ACQUISITION OF FUEL ADDITIVE BUSINESS
On September 30, 2003, the three monthsCompany's wholly-owned subsidiary, Fuel Tech,
Inc. (FTI), acquired the fuel additive business of Martin Marietta Magnesia
Specialties, LLC (MMMS). The Company believes that this acquired business is an
excellent strategic fit with its fuel treatment chemical business. In addition,
the Company believes that that it will be able to leverage its technology with
the MMMS customer base which will improve program results and increase revenues
from these accounts. Concurrently with this transaction, FTI entered into a
long-term chemical supply agreement with MMMS.
The acquisition of the fuel additive business from MMMS had no impact on
the Company's operating results for the quarter ended March 31
----------------------------------------September 30, 2003. If
the business had been acquired at January 1, 2003, 2002
---------------- ------------------
Revenues:
United States $ 6,879,000 $ 4,603,000
Foreign 1,157,000 618,000
---------------- ------------------
$ 8,036,000 $ 5,221,000
================ ==================
Operating Earnings:
United States $ (585,000) $ 4,000
Foreign 47,000 (14,000)
---------------- ------------------
$ (538,000) $ (10,000)
================ ==================
March 31, December 31,
2003 2002
---------------- ------------------
Assets:
United States $21,707,000 $24,393,000
Foreign 1,401,000 1,476,000
---------------- ------------------
$23,108,000 $25,869,000
================ ==================
8the impact on the financial
results of the Company on a year to date basis would not have been material.
The aggregate purchase price was $1,348,000, paid in cash. The following
table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired.
Asset Classification Value Assigned
===============
Equipment $ 50,000
Intangible assets subject to amortization 1,298,000
---------------
Total $ 1,348,000
===============
The intangible assets listed above consist primarily of customer contracts
And relationships acquired as part of the transaction. The customer intangible
will be amortized over a period of fifteen years.
FUEL-TECH N.V.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Results of OperationsRESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net sales for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2003 and 2002 were
$8,036,000$10,178,000 and $5,221,000,$8,033,000, respectively, while net sales for the nine months
ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 were $28,182,000 and $21,275,000,
respectively. Revenues for the three month period increased primarily due to a
90% increase in fuel treatment chemical revenues.
The improvementincrease in revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, is
attributable to an increase in domesticboth our NOx reduction business and our fuel
treatment chemical product line. Domestic NOx reduction utility project
revenues increased 33% during this period as project bookings from 2002 continue to generateand 2003
generated revenues from their various phases of completion. NOx reduction
utility revenue in 2002 wasand 2003 has been favorably impacted by the
Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) SIP (State Implementation Plan) Call
regulation (discussed further below) that requires utilities and large
industrial facilities in 19 states to reduce NOx emissions by May 31, 2004, and the Company expects to be impacted favorably by
this regulation throughout 2003 and beyond.2004.
Fuel treatment chemical revenuerevenues reached a record quarterly level for the
three-month periodthird quarter ended March 31, 2003September 30, as revenue derived from Western coal-fueled
utility boilers was favorably impacted by shipments
tostrong. In addition, positive contributions were attained
from utilities burning western coalsoil, both in the United States and by the acquisition of new oil-fired
business outside of the continental U.S.in foreign locations.
The Company believes that utilities
burningits success on several Western coals representcoal-fueled utility
boilers, along with intensely focused sales and marketing efforts and the
utilization of strategic partners, will lead to further penetration of the
Western coal-fueled utility market in the near future. This market represents
the largest market opportunity for itsthe fuel treatment chemical business and
that penetration into this market remainsis a priority. The investmentCompany's TIFI
(Targeted-In-Furnace-Injection) technology alleviates the slagging and fouling
issues associated with burning coals that are high in new personnel in 2002 to addresslow-melting-point ash
constituents, such as sodium. The Company expects additional demonstrations of
this opportunity
has begun to pay off, as demonstrations are expectedtechnology to commence in the second
quarterlatter part of 2003 at several new utilities. All of these utilities will be using
the Company's patented Targeted-In-Furnace-Injection (TIFI) process to control
the formation of slag deposits in boilers burning western coals.this year and into 2004.
The "SIP Call" is the federal mandate that, when introduced in 1998,
required 22 states to reduce NOx emissions by May 2003. This mandate was an
extension of Phase II of Title I of the CAAA. In May 1999 a stay was imposed on
this regulation. On March 3, 2000, an appellate court of the D.C. Circuit
upheld the validity of the SIP Call for 19 of the 22 states and, on June 22,
2000, the same court made a final ruling upholding the EPA's SIP call regulation
and denying the appeal of the states and utilities. Subsequent to this court
ruling, the stay on the SIP Call was lifted. Although the NOx reduction
requirement date was moved back one year to May of31, 2004, nineteen states were
required to complete and issue their State Implementation Plans for NOx
reduction by October of 2000. These plans, which the EPA had until October 2001
to approve, will potentially impact 700 to 800 utility boilers and 400 to 500
large industrial units.
In February 2001, the United States Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision,
upheld EPA's authority to revise the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for
ozone to 0.080 parts per million averaged through an eight-hour period from the
current 0.120 parts per million for a one-hour period. This more stringent
standard provides clarity and impetus for air pollution control efforts well
beyond the current ozone attainment requirement of 2007. In keeping with this
trend, the Supreme Court, only days later, denied industry's attempt to again
stay the SIP Call, effectively exhausting all means of appeal.
Even with the SIP Call in place, two factors have led to a recent slowing
of equipment orders in the air pollution control business. First, recent
rulings related to New Source Review have caused our utility customers to
reassess their SIP Call compliance plans to ensure that they will meet their
overall NOx reduction requirements in the most cost-effective manner. Although
the Company expects this recent ruling to benefit business in the future, the
impact in the near-term is a delay in the receipt of orders. Second, many
utilities are experiencing significant capital constraints. This, coupled with
depressed NOx allowance prices, the result of mild weather and weak demand for
power, has caused some utilities to delay capital spending and to meet their
requirements on a short-term basis through the purchase of allowances and other
temporary means. Based on these regulatory developments,market factors, the Company is enjoying
accelerated interest in its programs that have led to significant project
bookings in 2002, and anticipates strong demand for its air pollution control
technologies overbusiness has weakened but is expected to pick up in the next several years.second half of 2004 and
be strong in 2005 and 2006. The Company continues to work cooperatively with
our customers as they finalize their compliance plans.
Cost of sales as a percentage of net sales for the three-month period ended
March 31,September 30, 2003 was 55%, which approximated the level of a year ago. For the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2003, the percentage increased to 67%62% from
53% versus 49% in the same period of the prior year. This increase reflects a change
in product mix as a larger percentage of
revenues was realized from lower margin NOx reduction project business versus
the FUEL CHEM(R) business relative to the prior year. Additionally, within the NOx reduction project business, abusiness. A significantly
larger percentage of the revenues for the first quarternine months of 2003 waswere
generated by turnkey projects versus the comparable period in 2002. When the
Company is responsible for the turnkey installation of the equipment as part of
the project scope, overall project
revenues and margin dollars increase, however, the overall project margin becomes diluted. Installation
scope is not affordedcarries a significantly lower margin than the same marginCompany's traditional scope.
At the end of the second quarter of 2003, most of the work related to turnkey
projects was completed, and this accounts for the lower cost of sales percentage
in the market placethird quarter, as iscompared to the salefirst 2 quarters of the Company's patented technology.2003.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $2,854,000$2,961,000 and
$2,355,000,$2,717,000, respectively, for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2003 and
2002, and were $8,565,000 and $7,725,000 respectively for the nine months ended
September 30, 2003 and 2002. The increase is due primarily to the addition of
sales resources for the fuel treatment chemical business and, to a lesser
degree, to the addition of resources in support of the marketing and development
of the Company's ACUITIV(TM)ACUITIV advanced visualization software. As noted above, market penetration
of the Company's TIFI technology is a strategic priority.
9
Research and development expenses for the three-monthsquarter and nine months ended
March 31,September 30, 2003 increased marginally overwere slightly lower than the similar periodlevels of 2002.the prior year. The
Company continues to pursue commercial applications for its technologies outside
of its traditional markets, with a particular focus on its ACUITIV advanced
visualization software. The ACUITIV software product was commercially
introduced onin June 6, 2002, and the Company recently received its secondhas two commercial orderorders for the
software. The software is currently being demonstrated at 12 additional
sites. In addition,several sites, and
ACUITIV version 3.23.3 was released during the first quarter of
2003, with the primary enhancement being compatibility with Windows(R) 2000.recently released. This new release adds significant
functionality which is expected to broaden market acceptance. Although the
validity of the product has been confirmed, the Company does not expect revenues
related to this product to be material for the remainder of the year.
In the third quarter of 2002, the Company recognized a loss of $27,000 on
its 49 percent ownership interest in Fuel Tech CS Gmbh (FTCS). Through the
first quarternine months of 2002, the Company recognized income of $250,000 on its
equity investment in Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. (CDT), its 15 percent-owned
affiliate, which was partially offset by a loss of $12,000$54,000 that was realized on
its 49 percent ownership interest in Fuel Tech CS Gmbh.FTCS. The income in 2002's first quarter
from CDT resulted from CDT's repayment of loans made by the Company to CDT in
2000 and 2001. Because the Company's pro-rata share of CDT's losses reduced the
carrying value of the loans to zero at December 31, 2001, the entire loan
repayment was recorded as equity income in the first quarter of 2002.
In the first quarternine months of 2003, the Company did not realizerecognize any income
or loss from its equity investments. In the quarter ended September 30, 2003
the Company transferred to FTCS its 49 percent ownership interest in that
company, in connection with the collection of a related receivable from FTCS.
This transaction had no significant impact on the Company's financial
statements. The carrying value of the equity investment in CDT is zero at
September 30, 2003.
Interest expense for the three monthsnine month period ended March 31,September 30, 2003 was
reduced from the comparable period in 2002 due to a reduction in2002. In the Company's averagesecond quarter of the year,
the Company paid off the entirety of its outstanding debt balance, as well as to a reduction in short term interest
rates.balance.
The decline in other income and (expense) for the quarternine months ended
March 31,September 30, 2003 versus the prior year was due primarily to a reduction in
interest income resulting from the decrease in short-term rates noted above.rates.
No provision for federal or state income taxes was recorded during the
quarterthree and nine-month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2003 due to the existence of
net operating loss carryforwards. In the first quarter of 2002, an income tax
benefit of $50,000 was recorded which represented a reduction in the reserve for
prior years' state income tax refunds receivable.
Liquidity and Sources of CapitalLIQUIDITY AND SOURCES OF CAPITAL
For the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2003, the Company used cash for
operating activities in the amount of $2,137,000,$1,520,000, while $195,000$298,000 was used inby
operating activities for the same period in 2002. The use of cash for operating
activities in 2003 stems largely from a reduction in accounts payable and
accrued expenses, and to a lesser extent,which was partially offset by the first quarter's operating loss.Company's net income.
At March 31,September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the Company had cash and cash
equivalents of $8,328,000$5,791,000 and $10,939,000, respectively, while working capital
for the same two periods of time was $13,182,000$12,491,000 and $13,947,000, respectively. 10
Forward-Looking StatementsThe
decline in cash and working capital from December 31, 2002 was driven by the
repayment of $1,800,000 in long-term debt, the reduction in accounts payable and
accrued expenses, and by the acquisition of a fuel additive business for
$1,348,000. By repaying the debt, the Company's availability under its credit
facility increased by $1,800,000.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts, so-called
"forward-looking statements," are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors are cautioned
that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including
those detailed in the Company's filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. See "Risk Factors of the Business" in Item 1, "Business," and also
Item 7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations" in the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Please refer to Note D.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Within 90 days priorThe Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures and internal
controls designed to the filing date of this report,ensure that information required to be disclosed in the
Company's certifyingfilings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. The Company's management,
with the participation of its principal executive and financial officers, performed an evaluation ofhas
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures.procedures
as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The
Company's principal executive and financial officers have concluded, based on
such evaluation, that such disclosure controls and procedures were determined to be sufficient to ensureeffective for
the purpose for which they were designed as of the end of such period.
There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial
reporting that material information
relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to the certifying officers by others within those entities, particularlywas identified in connection with such evaluation that occurred
during the period in whichcovered by this quarterly reportQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has
materially affected, or is being prepared.
There were no significant changes inreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant'sCompany's
internal controls
or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to
the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
11
control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None
Item 2. Changes in Securities
None
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
a. Exhibits
Additional Exhibits 99.1Exhibit 31.1 and 99.231.2 are filed herewith
Exhibit 32 is furnished herewith
b. Reports on Form 8-K
None
12
The Company filed form 8-K on July 29, 2003. This filing
included the Company's second quarter 2003 earnings press release.
FUEL-TECH N.V.
SIGNATURES AND CERTIFICATIONS
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
The undersigned in their capacities as Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant do hereby certify that:
(i) this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(ii) information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report.
Date: May 10,November 7, 2003 By: /s/ Ralph E. Bailey
-----------------------------------------
Ralph E. Bailey
Chairman, Managing Director
and Chief Executive Officer
Date: May 10,November 7, 2003 By: /s/ Scott M. Schecter
---------------------------------------------
Scott M. Schecter
Chief Financial Officer,
Vice President and
Treasurer
13
I, Ralph E. Bailey, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fuel-Tech N.V.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules l3a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: May 10, 2003 By: /s/ Ralph E. Bailey
-------------------
Ralph E. Bailey
Chairman, Managing Director
and Chief Executive Officer
I, Scott M. Schecter, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fuel-Tech N.V.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules l3a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: May 10, 2003 By: /s/ Scott M. Schecter
---------------------
Scott M. Schecter
Chief Financial Officer,
Vice President and
Treasurer