UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________________________________ 
FORM 10-Q
______________________________________ 
x 
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 20182019
or
o 
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 1-16411
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 80-0640649
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
   
2980 Fairview Park Drive,
Falls Church, Virginia
 22042
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(703) 280-2900
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x
 
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes x
 
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer x
 
Accelerated filer o
   
Non-accelerated filer o(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 
Smaller reporting company o
   
Emerging growth company o
  
  
 Emerging growth company o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o
 
No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of April 20, 201819, 2019, 174,384,166169,799,679 shares of common stock were outstanding.


Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

TABLE OF CONTENTS 
  Page
  
Item 1. 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 2. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Item 3.
Item 4.
   
  
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
 

i

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.    Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31
$ in millions, except per share amounts2018 20172019
2018
Sales   




Product$4,289
 $3,997
$5,728

$4,289
Service2,446
 2,413
2,461

2,446
Total sales6,735
 6,410
8,189

6,735
Operating costs and expenses   




Product3,265
 2,983
4,517

3,269
Service1,905
 1,867
1,976

1,907
General and administrative expenses711
 698
760

711
Operating income854
 862
936

848
Other income (expense)   
Other (expense) income




Interest expense(143) (75)(138)
(143)
Net FAS (non-service) pension benefit (expense)120
 (18)
FAS (non-service) pension benefit200

254
Other, net40
 19
36

40
Earnings before income taxes871
 788
1,034

999
Federal and foreign income tax expense132
 138
171

159
Net earnings$739
 $650
$863

$840
   




Basic earnings per share$4.24
 $3.72
$5.08

$4.82
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, in millions174.3
 174.8
170.0

174.3
Diluted earnings per share$4.21
 $3.69
$5.06

$4.79
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding, in millions175.4
 176.1
170.7

175.4
   




Net earnings (from above)$739
 $650
$863

$840
Other comprehensive income   
Change in unamortized benefit plan costs, net of tax86
 99
Change in cumulative translation adjustment(2) 4
Other, net(1) 2
Other comprehensive income, net of tax83
 105
Other comprehensive loss   
Change in unamortized prior service credit, net of tax(11) (15)
Change in cumulative translation adjustment and other, net4
 (3)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax(7) (18)
Comprehensive income$822
 $755
$856
 $822
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

-1-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION
(Unaudited)
$ in millionsMarch 31,
2018
 December 31,
2017
$ in millions, except par valueMarch 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Assets      
Cash and cash equivalents$10,369
 $11,225
$755
 $1,579
Accounts receivable, net1,241
 1,054
2,166
 1,448
Unbilled receivables, net3,869
 3,465
5,785
 5,026
Inventoried costs, net435
 398
778
 654
Prepaid expenses and other current assets243
 445
959
 973
Total current assets16,157
 16,587
10,443
 9,680
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $5,119 for 2018 and $5,066 for 20174,285
 4,225
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $5,493 for 2019 and $5,369 for 20186,420
 6,372
Operating lease right-of-use assets1,283
 
Goodwill12,455
 12,455
18,698
 18,672
Intangible assets, net1,289
 1,372
Deferred tax assets474
 447
84
 94
Other non-current assets1,424
 1,414
1,534
 1,463
Total assets$34,795
 $35,128
$39,751
 $37,653
      
Liabilities      
Trade accounts payable$1,395
 $1,661
$1,932
 $2,182
Accrued employee compensation1,204
 1,382
1,404
 1,676
Advance payments and amounts in excess of costs incurred1,479
 1,761
Advance payments and billings in excess of costs incurred1,969
 1,917
Other current liabilities2,337
 2,288
3,516
 2,499
Total current liabilities6,415
 7,092
8,821
 8,274
Long-term debt, net of current portion of $868 for 2018 and $867 for 201714,392
 14,399
Pension and other post-retirement benefit plan liabilities5,362
 5,511
Long-term debt, net of current portion of $523 for 2019 and $517 for 201813,863
 13,883
Pension and other postretirement benefit plan liabilities5,646
 5,755
Operating lease liabilities1,098
 
Deferred tax liabilities133
 108
Other non-current liabilities946
 994
1,451
 1,446
Total liabilities27,115
 27,996
31,012
 29,466
      
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)
 

 
      
Shareholders’ equity      
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
 

 
Common stock, $1 par value; 800,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding: 2018—174,382,256 and 2017—174,085,619174
 174
Common stock, $1 par value; 800,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding: 2019—169,873,750 and 2018—170,607,336170
 171
Paid-in capital
 44

 
Retained earnings13,205
 11,632
8,628
 8,068
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(5,699) (4,718)(59) (52)
Total shareholders’ equity7,680
 7,132
8,739
 8,187
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$34,795
 $35,128
$39,751
 $37,653
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

-2-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31
$ in millions2018 20172019 2018
Operating activities      
Net earnings$739
 $650
$863
 $840
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash used in operating activities:   
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization122
 104
234
 122
Non-cash lease expense68
 
Stock-based compensation19
 17
26
 19
Deferred income taxes(55) (9)33
 (22)
Changes in assets and liabilities:      
Accounts receivable, net(187) (317)(718) (187)
Unbilled receivables, net(404) (665)(759) (404)
Inventoried costs, net(37) (27)(124) (37)
Prepaid expenses and other assets13
 (53)(23) 13
Accounts payable and other liabilities(590) (357)(480) (590)
Income taxes payable, net197
 152
140
 197
Retiree benefits(56) 86
(142) (190)
Other, net2
 (20)(31) 2
Net cash used in operating activities(237) (439)(913) (237)
      
Investing activities      
Capital expenditures(305) (216)(284) (305)
Other, net(2) 2
4
 (2)
Net cash used in investing activities(307) (214)(280) (307)
      
Financing activities      
Net payments to credit facilities(20) (14)
Net borrowings on commercial paper814
 
Common stock repurchases
 (229)(60) 
Cash dividends paid(198) (166)(211) (198)
Payments of employee taxes withheld from share-based awards(79) (90)(61) (79)
Net (payments to) proceeds from credit facilities(14) 
Other, net(21) 

 (21)
Net cash used in financing activities(312) (485)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents(856) (1,138)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year11,225
 2,541
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$10,369
 $1,403
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities462
 (312)
Decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(731) (856)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year1,579
 11,225
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period$848
 $10,369
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

-3-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31
$ in millions, except per share amounts2018 20172019 2018
Common stock      
Beginning of year$174
 $175
$171
 $174
Common stock repurchased
 (1)(1) 
Shares issued for employee stock awards and options
 1
End of period174
 175
170
 174
Paid-in capital      
Beginning of year44
 

 44
Stock compensation(44) 

 (44)
End of period
 

 
Retained earnings      
Beginning of year11,632
 10,734
8,068
 6,913
Impact from adoption of ASU 2018-02 and ASU 2016-01 (See Note 1)1,064
 
Impact from adoption of ASU 2018-02 and ASU 2016-01
 (21)
Common stock repurchased
 (215)(62) 
Net earnings739
 650
863
 840
Dividends declared(195) (159)(206) (195)
Stock compensation(35) (72)(35) (35)
End of period13,205
 10,938
8,628
 7,502
Accumulated other comprehensive loss   
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income   
Beginning of year(4,718) (5,546)(52) 1
Impact from adoption of ASU 2018-02 and ASU 2016-01 (See Note 1)(1,064) 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax83
 105
Impact from adoption of ASU 2018-02 and ASU 2016-01
 21
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax(7) (18)
End of period(5,699) (5,441)(59) 4
Total shareholders’ equity$7,680
 $5,672
$8,739
 $7,680
Cash dividends declared per share$1.10
 $0.90
$1.20
 $1.10
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

-4-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
1.    BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Principles of Consolidation and Reporting
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (the “financial statements”) include the accounts of Northrop Grumman Corporation and its subsidiaries and joint ventures or other investments for which we consolidate the financial results (herein referred to as “Northrop Grumman,” the “company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”). Material intercompany accounts, transactions and profits are eliminated in consolidation. Investments in equity securities and joint ventures where the company has significant influence, but not control, are accounted for using the equity method.
On June 6, 2018 (the “Merger date”), the company completed its previously announced acquisition of Orbital ATK, Inc. (“Orbital ATK”) (the “Merger”). On the Merger date, Orbital ATK became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the company and its name was changed to Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc., which we established as a new, fourth business sector (“Innovation Systems”). The operating results of Innovation Systems subsequent to the Merger date have been included in the company's unaudited condensed consolidated results of operations. See Note 2 for further information regarding the Merger.
These financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP” or “FAS”) and in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for interim reporting. The financial statements include adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary by management for a fair presentation of the company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
The results reported in these financial statements are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the information contained in the company’s 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 (2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K).10-K.
The quarterly information is labeled using a calendar convention; that is, first quarter is consistently labeled as ending on March 31, second quarter as ending on June 30 and third quarter as ending on September 30. It is the company’slegacy Northrop Grumman’s long-standing practice to establish actual interim closing dates using a “fiscal” calendar, in which we close our books on a Friday near these quarter-end dates in order to normalize the potentially disruptive effects of quarterly closings on business processes. Similarly, Innovation Systems uses a “fiscal” calendar by closing its books on a Sunday near these quarter-end dates and will continue this practice until its business processes are aligned with legacy Northrop Grumman’s. This practice is only used at interim periods within a reporting year.
As previously announced, effective January 1, 2018,2019, we adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 606,842, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2017-07, Compensation Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit CostLeases, using the full retrospective method.optional transition method to apply the standard through a cumulative effect adjustment in the period of adoption. The adoption of these standards arethis standard is reflected in the amounts and disclosures set forth in this Form 10-Q and the effect of these standards on the company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statement of earnings and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and unaudited condensed consolidated statement of financial position as of December 31, 2017 is reflected in Note 11.10-Q.
Accounting Estimates
Preparation of the financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingencies at the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of sales and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates have been prepared using the most current and best available information; however, actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The majority of our sales are derived from long-term contracts with the U.S. Governmentgovernment for the production of goods, the provision of services, or a combination of both. The company classifies sales as product or service based on the predominant attributes of each contract.
Under ASC Topic 606, theThe company recognizes revenue for each separately identifiable performance obligation in a contract representing a promise to transfer a distinct good or service to a customer. In most cases, goods and services provided under the company’s contracts are accounted for as single performance obligations due to the complex and integrated nature of our products and services. These contracts generally require significant integration of a group of goods and/or services to deliver a combined output. In some contracts, the company provides multiple distinct goods or services to a customer, most commonly when a contract covers multiple phases of the product lifecycle (development,(e.g., development, production, maintenance and/or support)sustainment, etc.). In those cases, the company accounts for the distinct contract deliverables as separate performance obligations and allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation based on its relative standalone selling price, which is generally estimated using thea cost plus a reasonable margin approachapproach. Warranties are

-5-

Table of ASC Topic 606. Warranties are Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

provided on certain contracts, but do not typically provide for services beyond standard assurances and are therefore not within the scope of ASC Topic 606. Likewise, our

-5-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

considered to be separate performance obligations. Our accounting for costs to obtain or fulfill a contract was not significantly impacted by the adoption of ASC Topic 606 as these costs are not material.
A contract modification exists when the parties to a contract approve a change in the scope or price of a contract. Contracts are often modified for changes in contract specifications or requirements.requirements, which may result in scope and/or price changes. Most of the company’s contract modifications are for goods or services that are not distinct in the context of the contract and are therefore accounted for as part of the original performance obligation through a cumulative estimate-at-completion (EAC) adjustment.
The company recognizes revenue as control is transferred to the customer, either over time or at a point in time. In general, our U.S. government contracts contain termination for convenience and/or other clauses that generally entitleprovide the customer rights to goods produced and/or in-process. Similarly, our non-U.S. government contracts generally contain contractual termination clauses or entitle the company to payment for work performed to date for goods and services that do not have an alternative use. As control is effectively transferred aswhile we perform on our contracts, and we are typically entitled to cost plus a reasonable margin for work in process if the contract is terminated, we generally recognize revenue over time on ausing the cost-to-cost basismethod (cost incurred relative to total cost estimated at completion) as the company believes this represents the most appropriate measurement towards satisfaction of its performance obligations. Revenue for contracts in which the control of goods produced does not transfer until delivery to the customer is recognized at a point in time (i.e., typically upon delivery).
Contract Estimates
Use of the cost-to-cost method requires us to make reasonably dependable estimates regarding the revenue and cost associated with the design, manufacture and delivery of our products and services. The company estimates profit on these contracts as the difference between total estimated sales and total estimated cost at completion and recognizes that profit as costs are incurred. Significant judgment is used to estimate total revenue and cost at completion.
Contract sales may include estimates of variable consideration, including cost or performance incentives (such as award and incentive fees), contract claims and requests for equitable adjustment (REAs). Variable consideration is included in total estimated sales to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is subsequently resolved. We estimate variable consideration atas the most likely amount to which we expect to be entitled.
We recognize changes in estimated contract sales or costs and the resulting changes in contract profit on a cumulative basis. Cumulative EAC adjustments represent the cumulative effect of the changes on current and prior periods; sales and operating margins in future periods are recognized as if the revised estimates had been used since contract inception. If it is determined that a loss is expected to result on an individual performance obligation, the entire amount of the estimable future loss, including an allocation of general and administrative (G&A) costs, is charged against income in the period the loss is identified. Each loss provision is first offset against costs included in unbilled accounts receivableUnbilled receivables or inventoriedInventoried costs; remaining amounts are reflected in Other current liabilities.
Significant EAC adjustments on a single contract could have a material effect on the company’s financial statements. When such adjustments occur, we generally disclose the nature, underlying conditions and financial impact of the adjustments. No discrete event or adjustments to an individual contract were material to the financial statements during the three months ended March 31, 20182019 and 2017.2018.
The following table presents the effect of aggregate net EAC adjustments:
Three Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31
$ in millions, except per share data2018 20172019 2018
Operating Income$116
 $141
Net Earnings(1)
92
 92
Operating income$138
 $116
Net earnings(1)
109
 92
Diluted earnings per share(1)
0.52
 0.52
0.64
 0.52
(1) 
Based on a 21 percent statutory tax rates in effect for each period presented.rate.
Revenue recognized from performance obligations satisfied in previous reporting periods was $133$166 million and $145$133 million for the three months ended March 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively.
Backlog
Backlog represents the future sales we expect to recognize on firm orders received by the company and is equivalent to the company’s remaining performance obligations at the end of each period. It comprises both funded backlog (firm orders for which funding is authorized and appropriated) and unfunded backlog. Unexercised contract options

-6-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

and indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts are not included in backlog until the time the option or IDIQ task order is exercised or awarded.
Company backlog as of March 31, 20182019 was $42.3$57.3 billion. We expect to recognize approximately 50 percent and 75 percent of our March 31, 20182019 backlog as revenue over the next 12 and 24 months, respectively, with the remainder to be recognized thereafter.
Contract Assets and Liabilities
For each of the company’s contracts, the timing of revenue recognition, customer billings, and cash collections results in a net contract asset or liability at the end of each reporting period. Fixed-price contracts are typically billed to the customer either using progress payments, whereby amounts are billed monthly as costs are incurred or work is completed, or performance based payments, which are based upon the achievement of specific, measurable events or accomplishments defined and valued at contract inception. Cost-type contracts are typically billed to the customer on a monthly or semi-monthly basis.
Contract assets consistare equivalent to and reflected as Unbilled receivables in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of unbilled receivables,financial position and are primarily related to long-term contracts where revenue recognized under the cost-to-cost method exceeds amounts billed to customers. Unbilled receivables are classified as current assets and, in accordance with industry practice, include amounts that may be billed and collected beyond one year due to the long-cycle nature of many of our contracts. Accumulated contract costs in unbilled receivables include costs such as direct production costs, factory and engineering overhead, production tooling costs, and for government contracts, allowable G&A. Unbilled receivables also include certain estimates of variable consideration described above. These contract assets are not considered a significant financing component of the company’s contracts as the payment terms are intended to protect the customer in the event the company does not perform on its obligations under the contract.
Contract liabilities include advanceare equivalent to and reflected as Advance payments and billings in excess of revenue recognized.costs incurred in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position. Certain customers make advance payments prior to the company’s satisfaction of the company’sits obligations on the contract. These amounts are recorded as contract liabilities until such obligations are satisfied, either over time as costs are incurred or at a point in time when deliveries are made. Contract liabilities are not a significant financing component as they are generally utilized to pay for contract costs within a one-year period or are used to ensure the customer meets contractual requirements.
Net contract assets (liabilities) are as follows:
$ in millionsMarch 31,
2018
 December 31,
2017
$ Change% Change
Unbilled receivables, net$3,869
 $3,465
$404
12 %
Advance payments and amounts in excess of costs incurred(1,479) (1,761)282
(16)%
Net contract assets (liabilities)$2,390
 $1,704
$686
40 %
The amount of revenue recognized for the three months ended March 31, 20182019 and 20172018 that was included in the opening contract liability balances at the beginning of each year was $674 million and $706 million, and $578 million, respectively.
The change in the balances of the company’s contract assets and liabilities primarily results from timing differences between company performance and customer payments. The increase in net contract assets during the three months ended March 31, 2018, is principally due to higher sales on restricted programs and the timing of collections on certain Manned Aircraft programs at Aerospace Systems.
Disaggregation of Revenue
See Note 1011 for information regarding the company’s sales by customer type, contract type and geographic region for each of our segments. We believe those categories best depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of our revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors.

-7-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:
$ in millionsMarch 31,
2018
 December 31,
2017
Unamortized benefit plan costs, net of tax benefit of $1,968 for 2018 and $3,056 for 2017$(5,560) $(4,586)
Cumulative translation adjustment(138) (136)
Other, net(1) 4
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss$(5,699) $(4,718)
Unamortized benefit plan costs as of March 31, 2018 reflect a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings of $1.1 billion of stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “2017 Tax Act”). This reclassification resulted from the company’s early adoption of ASU 2018-02 on January 1, 2018. See “Accounting Standards Updates” below for more information.
Unamortized benefit plan costs consist primarily of net after-tax actuarial losses totaling $5.7 billion and $4.7 billion as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Net actuarial gains or losses are re-determined annually or upon remeasurement events and principally arise from changes in the interest rate used to discount our benefit obligations and differences between expected and actual returns on plan assets.
$ in millions March 31,
2019
 December 31,
2018
Unamortized prior service credit, net of tax expense of $28 for 2019 and $32 for 2018 $87
 $98
Cumulative translation adjustment (143) (144)
Other, net (3) (6)
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss $(59) $(52)
Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss to net earnings related to the amortization of benefit plan costsprior service credit were $86$11 million and $99$15 million, net of taxes, for the three months ended March 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively. The reclassifications represent the amortization of net actuarial losses and prior service credits, and are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost.cost (benefit). See Note 8 for further information.
Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss to net earnings relating to cumulative translation adjustments and effective cash flow hedges were not material for the three months ended March 31, 20182019 and 2017.2018.
Leases
The company leases certain buildings, land and equipment. Under ASC 842, at contract inception we determine whether the contract is or contains a lease and whether the lease should be classified as an operating or a financing

-7-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

lease. Operating leases are included in Operating lease right-of-use (ROU) assets, Other current liabilities, and Operating lease liabilities in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position.
The company recognizes operating lease ROU assets and operating lease liabilities based on the present value of the future minimum lease payments over the lease term at commencement date. We use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date to determine the present value of future payments and the appropriate lease classification. Many of our leases include renewal options aligned with our contract terms. We define the initial lease term to include renewal options determined to be reasonably certain. In our adoption of ASC 842, we elected not to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for leases with an initial term of 12 months or less; we recognize lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. We elected the practical expedient to not separate lease components from nonlease components and applied that practical expedient to all material classes of leased assets.
Many of the company’s real property lease agreements contain incentives for tenant improvements, rent holidays, or rent escalation clauses. For tenant improvement incentives, if the incentive is determined to be a leasehold improvement owned by the lessee, the company generally records a deferred rent liability and amortizes the deferred rent over the term of the lease as a reduction to rent expense. For rent holidays and rent escalation clauses during the lease term, the company records rental expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. For these lease incentives, the company uses the date of initial possession as the commencement date, which is generally when the company is given the right of access to the space and begins to make improvements in preparation for intended use.
Finance leases are not material to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the company is not a lessor in any material arrangements. We do not have any material restrictions or covenants in our lease agreements, sale-leaseback transactions, land easements or residual value guarantees.
Restricted Cash
On occasion, we are required to maintain cash deposits with banks in connection with certain contingent obligations. This restricted cash is included inPrepaid expenses and other current assetsin the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position. As of March 31, 2019 our restricted cash totaled approximately $93 million. We had no restricted cash as of December 31, 2018.
Related Party Transactions
The company had no material related party transactions in any period presented.
Accounting Standards Updates
On February 14, 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. ASU 2018-02 allows companies to reclassify stranded tax effects resulting from the 2017 Tax Act from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. As described above, the company elected to early adopt ASU 2018-02 on January 1, 2018, which resulted in a reclassification of $1.1 billion of stranded tax effects, principally related to our unamortized benefit plan costs, from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings. This reclassification included $73 million of other income tax effects related to a reduction in the federal benefit associated with state taxes. Adoption of ASU 2018-02 did not have a material impact on the company’s results of operations and/or cash flows.
On March 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. ASU 2017-07 requires employers that sponsor defined benefit pension and/or other post-retirement benefit plans to report the service cost component of net benefit cost in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. Employers are required to present the other components of net benefit costs in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations. Additionally, only the service cost component of net periodic pension cost is eligible for asset capitalization. We adopted ASU 2017-07 on January 1, 2018 using the retrospective method. See Note 11 for information regarding the effect of adopting ASU 2017-07 on our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of earnings and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Adoption of ASU 2017-07 did not have a material impact on our consolidated statements of financial position and/or cash flows.
On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02ASC Topic 842 supersedes existing lease guidance, including ASC 840 - Leases. Among other things, ASU 2016-02 requires recognition of a right-of-use asset and liability for future lease payments for contracts that meet the definition of a lease and requires disclosure of certain information about leasing arrangements. On July 30, 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 will be effective January 1, 2019, although early adoption is permitted, and may be adopted using a modified retrospective transition method that applies the new lease requirements at the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements. TheNo. 2018-11,

-8-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

FASB has proposed a change that would allow a companyLeases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, which, among other things, allows companies to elect an optional transition method that appliesto apply the new lease requirementsstandard through a cumulative-effect adjustment in the period of adoption.
We expect to adoptadopted the standard on January 1, 2019 using the proposed optional transition method if finalizedand, as a result, did not recast prior period unaudited condensed comparative financial statements. All prior period amounts and disclosures are presented under ASC 840. We elected the package of practical expedients, which, among other things, allows us to carry forward our prior lease classifications under ASC 840. We did not elect to adopt the hindsight practical expedient and are therefore maintaining the lease terms we previously determined under ASC 840. Adoption of the new standard resulted in its current form. We are reviewing our leases to determine the effect ASU 2016-02 will have on the company’s consolidated financial position, annual resultsrecording of operations and/or cash flows. We currently expect the right-of-useadditional lease assets and lease liabilities recognized upon adoption will each approximate our future minimum lease payments, as disclosed in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K. We do not expect ASU 2016-02 to have a materialthe unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position with no cumulative impact on our annual results of operations and/or cash flows.
On January 5, 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments (Topic 825): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments that are not accounted for under the equity method of accounting or that do not result in consolidation of the investee to be measured at fair value with changes recognized in net earnings. ASU 2016-01 also eliminates the available-for-sale classification for equity investments that recognized changes in fair value as a component of other comprehensive income. We adopted ASU 2016-01 on January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective method, which resulted in a $4 million (net of tax) cumulative-effect adjustment from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings. Adoption of ASU 2016-01earnings and did not have a material impact on our results of operations and/or cash flows.
On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). Topic 606 supersedes previous revenue recognition guidance, including ASC 605-35, Revenue Recognition - Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts, and outlines a single set of comprehensive principles for recognizing revenue under U.S. GAAP. Among other things, it requires companies to identify contractual performance obligations and determine whether revenue should be recognized at a point in time or over time. The primary impact of the adoption of ASC Topic 606 was that, in most cases, the accounting for those contracts where we previously recognized revenue as units were delivered changed under ASC Topic 606 such that we now recognize revenue as costs are incurred. In addition, for certain of our contracts, there is a change in the number of performance obligations under ASC Topic 606, which has altered the timing of revenue and margin recognition.
We adopted ASC Topic 606 on January 1, 2018 using the full retrospective method. We applied the transition practical expedient related to remaining performance obligations for reporting periods presented before the date of initial application. No other practical expedients were applied. The cumulative effect of adopting ASC Topic 606 was a $148 million increase to retained earnings at January 1, 2016. See Note 11 for information regarding the effect of adopting ASC Topic 606 on our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of earnings and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and unaudited condensed consolidated statement of financial position as of December 31, 2017.
Other accounting standards updates adopted and/or issued, but not effective until after March 31, 2018,2019, are not expected to have a material effect on the company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial position, annual results of operations and/or cash flows.

-8-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

2.    PENDING  ACQUISITION OF ORBITAL ATK
On September 17, 2017,June 6, 2018, the company entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquirecompleted its previously announced acquisition of Orbital ATK, by acquiring all of the outstanding shares of Orbital ATK Inc. (Orbital ATK) for approximately $7.8a purchase price of $7.7 billion in cash, pluscash. On the assumption of approximately $1.4 billion in net debt (the “OrbitalMerger date, Orbital ATK Acquisition”). Under the termsbecame a wholly-owned subsidiary of the merger agreement, Orbital ATK shareholders arecompany and its name was changed to receive all-cash consideration of $134.50 per share.Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc. We expect to fund the Orbital ATK Acquisitionestablished Innovation Systems as a new, fourth business sector. Its main products include precision munitions and armaments; tactical missiles and subsystems; ammunition; launch vehicles; space and strategic propulsion systems; aerospace structures; space exploration products; and national security and commercial satellite systems and related components/services. The acquisition was financed with the proceeds from ourthe company’s debt financing completed in October 2017 and cash on hand. On November 29, 2017,We believe this acquisition will enable us to broaden our capabilities and offerings, provide additional innovative solutions to meet our customers’ emerging requirements, create value for shareholders and provide expanded opportunities for our combined employees.
Preliminary Purchase Price Allocation
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination. As such, the company recorded the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value, with the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed recorded as goodwill. Determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires significant judgment, including the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, long-term growth rates and discount rates. In some cases, the company used discounted cash flow analyses, which were based on our best estimate of future sales, earnings and cash flows after considering such factors as general market conditions, customer budgets, existing firm and future orders, changes in working capital, long term business plans and recent operating performance. Use of different estimates and judgments could yield materially different results.
During the second quarter of 2018, the company completed a preliminary analysis to determine the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the amounts recorded reflected management’s initial assessment of fair value as of the Merger date. Based on additional information obtained to date, the company refined its initial assessment of fair value and recognized the following significant adjustments to our preliminary purchase price allocation: Intangible assets increased $220 million, Other current liabilities increased $114 million, Pension and other postretirement benefit (OPB) plan liabilities increased $56 million, Other non-current liabilities increased $53 million and Goodwill decreased $47 million. These adjustments did not result in a material impact on the financial results of prior periods.
The company expects to finalize its purchase price allocation within one year of the Merger date. We are continuing to analyze and assess relevant information in the following areas to determine the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the Merger date: certain income tax, legal and contract-related matters. The final fair value determination could result in material adjustments to the values presented in the preliminary purchase price allocation table below.
The Merger date fair value of the consideration transferred totaled $7.7 billion in cash, which was comprised of the following:
$ in millions, except per share amounts Purchase price
Shares of Orbital ATK common stock outstanding as of the Merger date 57,562,152
Cash consideration per share of Orbital ATK common stock $134.50
Total purchase price $7,742

-9-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

The following preliminary purchase price allocation table presents the company’s refined estimate of the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the Merger date:
$ in millions 
As of
June 6, 2018
Cash and cash equivalents $85
Accounts receivable 596
Unbilled receivables 1,264
Inventoried costs 220
Other current assets 226
Property, plant and equipment 1,509
Goodwill 6,248
Intangible assets 1,525
Other non-current assets 151
Total assets acquired 11,824
Trade accounts payable (397)
Accrued employee compensation (158)
Advance payments and billings in excess of costs incurred (222)
Below market contracts(1)
 (151)
Other current liabilities (412)
Long-term debt (1,687)
Pension and OPB plan liabilities (613)
Deferred tax liabilities (253)
Other non-current liabilities (189)
Total liabilities assumed (4,082)
Total purchase price $7,742
(1)
Included in Other current liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position.
The following table presents a summary of purchased intangible assets and their related estimated useful lives:
  
Fair Value
(in millions)
 Estimated Useful Life in Years
Customer contracts $1,245
 9
Commercial customer relationships 280
 13
Total customer-related intangible assets $1,525
  
The preliminary purchase price allocation resulted in the recognition of $6.2 billion of goodwill, a majority of which was allocated to the Innovation Systems sector. The goodwill recognized is attributable to expected revenue synergies generated by the integration of Aerospace Systems, Mission Systems and Technology Services products and technologies with those of legacy Orbital ATK, shareholders approvedsynergies resulting from the proposedconsolidation or elimination of certain costs, and intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition, such as the assembled workforce of Orbital ATK. None of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.

-10-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Unaudited Supplemental Pro Forma Information
The following table presents unaudited pro forma financial information prepared in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X and computed as if Orbital ATK Acquisition. On February 12, 2018,had been included in our results as of January 1, 2017:
$ in millions, except per share amountsThree Months Ended March 31, 2018
Sales$8,000
Net earnings914
Diluted earnings per share5.21
The unaudited supplemental pro forma financial data has been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the European Commission approved the proposedhistorical results of Orbital ATK Acquisition. We currently expectwith pro forma adjustments, net of tax, that assume the acquisition occurred on January 1, 2017. Significant pro forma adjustments include the following:
1.The elimination of intercompany sales and costs of sales between the company and Orbital ATK of $47 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018.
2.The elimination of nonrecurring transaction costs incurred by the company and Orbital ATK in connection with the Merger of $7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018.
3.The recognition of additional depreciation expense, net of removal of historical depreciation expense, of $6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 related to the step-up in fair value of acquired property, plant and equipment.
4.The recognition of additional amortization expense, net of removal of historical amortization expense, of $66 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018 related to the fair value of acquired intangible assets.
5.The elimination of Orbital ATK's historical amortization of net actuarial losses and prior service credits and impact of the revised pension and OPB net periodic benefit cost as determined under the company’s plan assumptions of $31 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018.
6.The income tax effect on the pro forma adjustments, which was calculated using the federal statutory tax rate, of $7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2018.
The unaudited pro forma financial information does not reflect the potential realization of revenue synergies or cost savings, nor does it reflect other costs relating to close in the first half of 2018, after receiving regulatory approvals. Upon completionintegration of the Orbital ATK Acquisition, we plan to establish Orbital ATK as a new, fourth business sector named Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems.two companies. This unaudited pro forma financial information should not be considered indicative of the results that would have actually occurred if the acquisition had been consummated on January 1, 2017, nor are they indicative of future results.
3.    EARNINGS PER SHARE, SHARE REPURCHASES AND DIVIDENDS ON COMMON STOCK
Basic Earnings Per Share
We calculate basic earnings per share by dividing net earnings by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period.

-9-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Diluted Earnings Per Share
Diluted earnings per share primarily include the dilutive effect of awards granted to employees under stock-based compensation plans. The dilutive effect of these securities totaled 1.10.7 million shares and 1.31.1 million shares for the three months ended March 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively.
Share Repurchases
On September 16, 2015, the company’s board of directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $4.0 billion of the company’s common stock (the “2015 Repurchase Program”). Repurchases under the 2015 Repurchase Program commenced in March 2016.
On December 4, 2018, the company’s board of directors authorized a new share repurchase program of up to an additional $3.0 billion in share repurchases of the company’s common stock (the “2018 Repurchase Program”). By its terms, repurchases under the 2018 Repurchase Program will commence upon completion of the 2015 Repurchase Program and will expire when we have used all authorized funds for repurchases.
During the fourth quarter of 2018, the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase (ASR) agreement with Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC (Goldman Sachs) to repurchase $1.0 billion of the company’s common stock under the 2015 Repurchase Program. Under the agreement, we made a payment of $1.0 billion to Goldman Sachs and

-11-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

received an initial delivery of 3.0 million shares valued at $800 million that were immediately canceled by the company. The remaining balance was settled on January 4, 2019 with a final delivery of 0.9 million shares from Goldman Sachs. The final average purchase price was $260.32 per share.
As of March 31, 2018,2019, repurchases under the 2015 Repurchase Program totaled $1.7$3.0 billion; $2.3$1.0 billion remained under this share repurchase authorization. By its terms, the 2015 Repurchase Program is set to expire when we have used all authorized funds for repurchases.
Share repurchases take place from time to time, subject to market conditions and management’s discretion, in the open market orand in privately negotiated transactions. The company retires its common stock upon repurchase and, in the periods presented, has not made any purchases of common stock other than in connection with these publicly announced repurchase programs.
The table below summarizes the company’s share repurchases to date under the authorizations described above:
       Shares Repurchased
(in millions)
       Shares Repurchased
(in millions)
Repurchase Program
Authorization Date
 Amount
Authorized
(in millions)
 Total
Shares Retired
(in millions)
 
Average 
Price
Per Share
(1)
 Date Completed Three Months Ended March 31 Amount
Authorized
(in millions)
 Total
Shares Retired
(in millions)
 
Average 
Price
Per Share
(1)
 Date Completed Three Months Ended March 31
2018 2017 2019 2018
September 16, 2015 $4,000
 7.4
 $222.93
 
 
 0.9
 $4,000
 12.4
 $241.36
 
 1.1
 
December 4, 2018 $3,000
 
 $
 
 
 
(1) 
Includes commissions paid.
Dividends on Common Stock
In May 2018, the company increased the quarterly common stock dividend 9 percent to $1.20 per share from the previous amount of $1.10 per share.
In January 2018, the company increased the quarterly common stock dividend 10 percent to $1.10 per share from the previous amount of $1.00 per share.
In May 2017, the company increased the quarterly common stock dividend 11 percent to $1.00 per share from the previous amount of $0.90 per share.
4.    INCOME TAXES
Three Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31
$ in millions2018
20172019
2018
Federal and foreign income tax expense$132
 $138
$171
 $159
Effective income tax rate15.2% 17.5%16.5% 15.9%
The company’s effective tax rate of 15.2 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was lower as compared with the same period in 2017 principally due to the reduction of the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent as a result of the 2017 Tax Act. Both periods reflect comparable tax benefits associated with research credits. In addition, the company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31,first quarter of 2019 increased to 16.5 percent from 15.9 percent in the first quarter of 2018 primarily due to lower tax benefits related to employee share-based compensation and claims for prior year manufacturing deductions, partially offset by higher research credits. The company’s effective rate for the first quarter of 2019 includes $26$31 million of research credits and $13 million of excess tax benefits related tofor employee share-based compensation. The company’s effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2017first quarter of 2018 included $47$26 million of excess tax benefits related tofor employee share-based compensation, a $42$20 million benefit recognized in connection with the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation’s approval of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examination of the company’s 2012-2013 tax returns, a $22 million benefit recognized for additional research credits claimed on ourand $8 million of claims for prior year tax returns and $15 million of domestic manufacturing deductions.
In December 2017, the 2017 Tax Act was enacted. The 2017 Tax Act includes a number of changes to previous U.S. tax laws that impact the company, most notably a reduction of the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. The company recognized the income tax effects of the 2017 Tax Act in the financial statements included in its 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which provides SEC staff guidance for the application of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, in the reporting period in which the 2017 Tax Act was signed into law. During the three months ended March

-10-

Table 31, 2019, we increased our unrecognized tax benefits related to our methods of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

31, 2018, the company did not recognize any changes to the provisional amounts recorded in its 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K in connectionaccounting associated with the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act asby approximately $15 million and it is reasonably possible that within the company is continuingnext twelve months those unrecognized tax benefits may increase by up to collect the information necessary to complete those calculations.an additional $70 million.
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in various state and foreign jurisdictions. Our 2014-2015The Northrop Grumman 2014-2017 federal tax returns and our refund claims related to our 2007-2011its 2007-2016 federal tax returns are currently under IRS examination. The company believes it is reasonably possible that withinIn addition, legacy Orbital ATK federal tax returns for the next twelve months we may resolve certain matters related toyear ended March 31, 2015, the examinationnine-month transition period ended December 31, 2015 and calendar year 2016 are currently under IRS examination.

-12-

Table of the 2014-2015 tax years, which may result in reductions of our unrecognized tax benefits up to $115 million and income tax expense up to $30 million.Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

5.    FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The company holds a portfolio of marketable securities consisting of securities to partially fund non-qualified employee benefit plans. TheseA portion of these securities are held in common/collective trust funds and are measured at fair value using net asset value (NAV) per share as a practical expedient; and therefore are not required to be categorized in the fair value hierarchy table below. Marketable securities are included in otherOther non-current assets in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position.
The company'scompany’s derivative portfolio consists primarily of commodity forward contracts and foreign currency forward contracts. WhereThe company periodically uses commodity forward contracts to hedge forecasted purchases of certain commodities. The contracts generally establish a fixed price for the underlying commodity and are designated and qualify as effective cash flow hedges of such commodity purchases. Commodity derivatives are valued based on prices of future exchanges and recently reported transactions in the marketplace. For foreign currency forward contracts, where model-derived valuations are appropriate, the company utilizes the income approach to determine the fair value and uses the applicable London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) swap rates.
The following table presents the financial assets and liabilities we recordthe company records at fair value on a recurring basis identified by the level of inputs used to determine fair value:
 March 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 March 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
$ in millions Level 1 Level 2 Total Level 1 Level 2 Total Level 1 Level 2 Total Level 1 Level 2 Total
Financial Assets (Liabilities)                        
Marketable securities $347
 $1
 $348
 $352
 $1
 $353
 $347
 $
 $347
 $319
 $1
 $320
Marketable securities valued using NAV 
 
 16
 
 
 15
Total marketable securities 347
 
 363
 319
 1
 335
Derivatives 
 1
 1
 
 
 
 
 (5) (5) 
 (10) (10)
At March 31, 2019, the company had commodity forward contracts outstanding that hedge forecasted commodity purchases of 19 million pounds of copper and 7 million pounds of zinc. Gains or losses on the commodity forward contracts are recognized in product and service cost as the performance obligations on related contracts are satisfied.
The notional value of the company’s derivative portfolioforeign currency forward contracts at March 31, 20182019 and December 31, 2017,2018 was $83$111 million and $89$114 million, respectively. The portion of notional value designated as a cash flow hedge at March 31, 2018 and2019 was $12 million. At December 31, 20172018, no portion of the notional value was $7 million and $8 million, respectively. designated as a cash flow hedge.
The derivative fair values and related unrealized gains/losses at March 31, 20182019 and December 31, 20172018 were not material.
There were no transfers of financial instruments between the three levels of the fair value hierarchy during the three months ended March 31, 2018.2019.
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents and commercial paper approximates fair value.
Long-term Debt
The estimated fair value of long-term debt was $15.4$14.8 billion and $16.0$14.3 billion as of March 31, 20182019 and December 31, 2017,2018, respectively. We calculated the fair value of long-term debt using Level 2 inputs, based on interest rates available for debt with terms and maturities similar to the company’s existing debt arrangements. The carrying value of long-term debt was $15.3$14.4 billion as of March 31, 20182019 and December 31, 2017.2018. The current portion of long-term debt is recorded in Other current liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position.
6.    INVESTIGATIONS, CLAIMS AND LITIGATION
Litigation
On May 4, 2012, the company commenced an action, Northrop Grumman Systems Corp. v. United States, in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. This lawsuit relates to an approximately $875 million firm fixed pricefixed-price contract awarded to the company in 2007 by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) for the construction and delivery of flats sequencing systems (FSS) as part of the postal automation program. The FSS have been delivered. The company’s lawsuit is based on various theories of liability. The complaint seeks approximately $63 million for unpaid portions of the contract price, and approximately $115 million based on the company’s assertions that, through various acts and omissions over the life of the contract, the USPS adversely affected the cost and schedule of performance and materially altered the company’s obligations under the contract. The United States responded to the company’s

-13-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

complaint with an answer, denying most of the company’s claims, and counterclaims seeking approximately $410 million, less certain amounts outstanding under the contract. The principal counterclaim alleges that the company delayed its performance and caused damages to the USPS because USPS did not realize certain costs savings as

-11-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

early as it had expected. On April 2, 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice informed the company of a False Claims Act complaint relating to the FSS contract that was filed under seal by a relator in June 2011 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. On June 3, 2013, the United States filed a Notice informing the Court that the United States had decided not to intervene in this case. The relator alleged that the company violated the False Claims Act in a number of ways with respect to the FSS contract, alleged damage to the USPS in an amount of at least approximately $179 million annually, alleged that he was improperly discharged in retaliation, and sought an unspecified partial refund of the contract purchase price, penalties, attorney’s fees and other costs of suit. The relator later voluntarily dismissed his retaliation claim and reasserted it in a separate arbitration, which he also ultimately voluntarily dismissed. On September 5, 2014, the court granted the company’s motion for summary judgment and ordered the relator’s False Claims Act case be dismissed with prejudice. On December 19, 2014, the company filed a motion for partial summary judgment asking the court to dismiss the principal counterclaim referenced above. On June 29, 2015, the Court heard argument and denied that motion without prejudice to filing a later motion to dismiss. On February 16, 2018, both the company and the United States filed motions to dismiss many of the claims and counterclaims in whole or in part. The United States also filed a motion seeking to amend its answer and counterclaim, including to reduce its counterclaim to approximately $193 million.million, which the court granted on June 11, 2018. On October 17, 2018, the court granted in part and denied in part the parties’ motions to dismiss. On December 17, 2018, the court issued a Scheduling Order, proposed by the parties, providing for the parties to engage in mediation through March 1, 2019. After the government shutdown, the mediation was rescheduled for May 2019. The Scheduling Order provides for pretrial activities to resume, if and as necessary, with trial to commence on or about September 23, 2019. Although the ultimate outcome of these matters (“the FSS matters,” collectively), including any possible loss, cannot be predicted or reasonably estimated at this time, the company intends vigorously to pursue and defend the FSS matters.
On August 8, 2013, the company received a court-appointed expert’s report in litigation pending in the Second Federal Court of the Federal District in Brazil brought by the Brazilian Post and Telegraph Corporation (ECT), a Brazilian state-owned entity, against Solystic SAS (Solystic), a French subsidiary of the company, and two of its consortium partners. In this suit, commenced on December 17, 2004, and relatively inactive for some period of time, ECT alleges the consortium breached its contract with ECT and seeks damages of approximately R$111 million (the equivalent of approximately $34$28 million as of March 31, 2018)2019), plus interest, inflation adjustments and attorneys’ fees, as authorized by Brazilian law, which amounts could be significant over time. The original suit sought R$89 million (the equivalent of approximately $27$23 million as of March 31, 2018)2019) in damages. In October 2013, ECT asserted an additional damage claim of R$22 million (the equivalent of approximately $7$6 million as of March 31, 2018)2019). In its counterclaim, Solystic alleges ECT breached the contract by wrongfully refusing to accept the equipment Solystic had designed and built and seeks damages of approximately €31 million (the equivalent of approximately $38$35 million as of March 31, 2018)2019), plus interest, inflation adjustments and attorneys’ fees, as authorized by Brazilian law. The Brazilian court retained an expert to consider certain issues pending before it. On August 8, 2013 and September 10, 2014, the company received reports from the expert, which contain some recommended findings relating to liability and the damages calculations put forth by ECT. Some of the expert’s recommended findings were favorable to the company and others were favorable to ECT. In November 2014, the parties submitted comments on the expert’s most recent report. On June 16, 2015, the court published a decision denying the parties’ request to present oral testimony. At some future point, the court is expected to issueIn a decision dated November 13, 2018, the trial court ruled in ECT’s favor on one of its claims against Solystic, and awarded damages of R$41 million (the equivalent of approximately $10 million as of March 31, 2019) against Solystic and its consortium partners, with that amount to be adjusted for inflation and interest from November 2004 through any appeal, in accordance with the parties’ claims and counterclaims that could accept or reject, in whole or in part,Manual of Calculations of the expert’s recommended findings.
The company previously identified and disclosedFederal Justice, as well as attorneys’ fees. On March 22, 2019, ECT appealed the trial court’s decision to the U.S. Government various issues relating primarily to time-charging practicesintermediate court of some employees workingappeals. Solystic filed its appeal on April 11, 2019. The parties are exploring possible resolution under a particular program with remote deployments. The Department of Justice is continuing to investigate this matter, and the company is cooperating in that investigation. Depending upon the ultimate outcome of this matter, the company could be subject to damages, civil or criminal fines, penalties or other sanctions, and suspension or debarment actions; however, we cannot at this point predict the outcome. newly-established short term ECT dispute resolution program.
We are engaged in remediation activities relating to environmental conditions allegedly resulting from historic operations at the former United States Navy and Grumman facilities in Bethpage, New York. For over 20 years, we have worked closely with the United States Navy, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, the New York State Department of Health and other federal, state and local governmental authorities, to address legacy environmental conditions in Bethpage. We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, as included in Note 7, substantial remediation costs related to these environmental conditions. The remediation standards or requirements to which we are subject are being reconsidered and may

-14-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

change and costs may increase materially. The State of New York has notified us that it intends to seek to impose additional remedial requirements and, among other things, is also evaluating natural resource damages. In addition, we are a party to various, and mayexpect to become a party to variousadditional, legal proceedings and disputes related to remediation and/or alleged environmental impacts in Bethpage, including with federal and state entities, local municipalities and water districts, insurance carriers and class action plaintiffs.and individual plaintiffs alleging personal injury and property damage and seeking both monetary and non-monetary relief. These Bethpage matters could result in additional costs, fines, penalties, sanctions, compensatory or other damages (including natural resource damages), determinations on allocation, allowability and coverage, and non-

-12-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

monetarynon-monetary relief. We cannot at this time predict or reasonably estimate the potential cumulative outcomes or ranges of possible liability of these aggregate Bethpage matters.
On August 12, 2016, a putative class action complaint, naming Orbital ATK and two of its then-officers as defendants, Steven Knurr, et al. v. Orbital ATK, Inc., No. 16-cv-01031 (TSE-MSN), was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The complaint asserts claims on behalf of purchasers of Orbital ATK securities for violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5, allegedly arising out of false and misleading statements and the failure to disclose that: (i) Orbital ATK lacked effective control over financial reporting; and (ii) as a result, it failed to record an anticipated loss on a long-term contract with the U.S. Army to manufacture and supply small caliber ammunition at the U.S. Army's Lake City Army Ammunition Plant. On April 24, 2017 and October 10, 2017, the plaintiffs filed amended complaints naming additional defendants and asserting claims for alleged violations of additional sections of the Exchange Act and alleged false and misleading statements in Orbital ATK’s Form S-4 filed in connection with the Orbital-ATK Merger. The complaint seeks damages, reasonable costs and expenses at trial, including counsel and expert fees, and such other relief as deemed appropriate by the Court. On August 8, 2018, plaintiffs sought leave to file an additional amended complaint; defendants filed an opposition. The parties engaged in mediation on November 6, 2018. On December 27, 2018, the parties reached a preliminary agreement to resolve the litigation for $108 million subject to agreement on additional terms and to court approval. On February 22, 2019, the court preliminarily approved the parties’ proposed settlement and set a schedule for final settlement proceedings, including a final approval settlement hearing on June 7, 2019. The company is also negotiating with and pursuing coverage litigation against various of its insurance carriers. The company intends vigorously to defend itself in connection with these matters. We currently expect related contingencies will continue to be included in the company’s measurement period adjustments of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Merger (see Note 2).
The SEC is investigating Orbital ATK’s historical accounting practices relating to the restatement of Orbital’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarterly periods ended July 5, 2015 and October 4, 2015 described in the Transition Report on Form 10-K for the nine-month period ending December 31, 2015 previously filed on March 15, 2016. The SEC is also investigating matters relating to a voluntary disclosure Orbital ATK made concerning the restatement described in Orbital ATK’s Form 10-K/A for the nine-month period ending December 31, 2015 filed on February 24, 2017. The ultimate outcome of these matters, including any possible loss, cannot be predicted or reasonably estimated at this time and the company intends to continue to cooperate with the SEC.
The company is a party to various other investigations, lawsuits, arbitration, claims, enforcement actions and other legal proceedings, including government investigations and claims, that arise in the ordinary course of our business. The nature of legal proceedings is such that we cannot assure the outcome of any particular matter. However, based on information available to the company to date, the company does not believe that the outcome of any of these other matters pending against the company is likely to have a material adverse effect on the company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2018,2019, or its annual results of operations and/or cash flows.
7.    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
U.S. Government Cost Claims
From time to time, the company is advised of claims by the U.S. Governmentgovernment concerning certain potential disallowed costs, plus, at times, penalties and interest. When such findings are presented, the company and U.S. Governmentgovernment representatives engage in discussions to enable the company to evaluate the merits of these claims, as well as to assess the amounts being claimed. Where appropriate, provisions are made to reflect the company’s estimated exposure for such potential disallowed costs. Such provisions are reviewed periodically using the most recent information available. The company believes it has adequately reserved for disputed amounts that are probable and reasonably estimable, and that the outcome of any such matters would not have a material adverse

-15-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

effect on its unaudited condensed consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2018,2019, or its annual results of operations and/or cash flows.
Environmental Matters
The table below summarizes management’s estimate of the range of reasonably possible future costs for environmental remediation, the amount accrued within that range, and the deferred costs expected to be recoverable through overhead charges on U.S. Governmentgovernment contracts as of March 31, 20182019 and December 31, 2017:2018:
$ in millions 
Range of Reasonably Possible Future Costs(1)
 
Accrued Costs(2)
 
Deferred Costs(3)
March 31, 2018 $410 - $789 $416
 $211
December 31, 2017 405 - 792 410
 207
$ in millions 
Range of Reasonably Possible Future Costs(1)
 
Accrued Costs(2)
 
Deferred Costs(3)
March 31, 2019 $460 - $836 $473
 $353
December 31, 2018 447 - 835 461
 343
(1) 
Estimated remediation costs are not discounted to present value. The range of reasonably possible future costs does not take into consideration amounts expected to be recoverable through overhead charges on U.S. Governmentgovernment contracts.
(2) As of March 31, 2018, $1512019, $172 million is recorded in otherOther current liabilities and $265$301 million is recorded in otherOther non-current liabilities.
(3) As of March 31, 2018, $792019, $139 million is deferred in prepaidPrepaid expenses and other current assets and $132$214 million is deferred in otherOther non-current assets. These amounts are evaluated for recoverability on a routine basis.
Although management cannot predict whether new information gained as our environmental remediation projects progress, or as changes in facts and circumstances occur, will materially affect the estimated liability accrued, except with respect to Bethpage, we do not anticipate that future remediation expenditures associated with our currently identified projects will have a material adverse effect on the company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2018,2019, or its annual results of operations and/or cash flows. With respect to Bethpage, as described in Note 6, we cannot at this time estimate the range of reasonably possible additional future costs that could result from potential changes to remediation standards or requirements to which we are subject.
Financial Arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, the company uses standby letters of credit and guarantees issued by commercial banks and surety bonds issued principally by insurance companies to guarantee the performance on certain obligations. At March 31, 2018,2019, there were $192$493 million of stand-by letters of credit and guarantees and $196$200 million of surety bonds outstanding.
IndemnificationsCommercial Paper
The company has provided indemnification for certain environmental, income tax and other potentialmaintains a commercial paper program that serves as a source of short-term financing with capacity to issue unsecured commercial paper notes up to $2.0 billion. At March 31, 2019, there were $1.0 billion of outstanding short-term commercial paper borrowings at a weighted-average interest rate of 3.04 percent that have original maturities of three months or less from the date of issuance. The outstanding balance of commercial paper borrowings is recorded in Other current liabilities in connection with certain of its divestitures. The settlement of these liabilities is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company’s unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position asposition.
Credit Facilities
The company maintains a five-year senior unsecured credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $2.0 billion (the “2018 Credit Agreement”) that matures in August 2023. At March 31, 2019, there was no balance outstanding under this facility; however, the outstanding balance of commercial paper borrowings reduces the amount available for borrowing under the 2018 or its annual results of operations and/or cash flows.

-13-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Operating Leases
Rental expense for operating leases for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 was $92 million and $89 million, respectively. These amounts are net of immaterial amounts of sublease rental income.
Credit FacilitiesAgreement.
In December 2016, a subsidiary of the company entered into a two-year credit facility, with two additional one-year option periods, in an aggregate principal amount of £120 million (the equivalent of approximately $170$156 million as of March 31, 2018)2019) (the “2016 Credit Agreement”). The company exercised the firstsecond option to extend the maturity to December 2019.2020. The 2016 Credit Agreement is guaranteed by the company. At March 31, 2018,2019, there was £90£70 million (the equivalent of approximately $127$91 million) outstanding under this facility, which bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.10 percent. All of the borrowings outstanding under this facility mature less than one year from the date of issuance, but may be renewed under the terms of the facility. Based on our intent and ability to refinance the obligations on a long-term basis, substantially alla large majority of the borrowings are classified as non-current.
The company also maintains a five-year unsecured credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $1.6 billion that matures in July 2020. At March 31, 2018, there was no balance outstanding under this facility.
At March 31, 2018,2019, the company was in compliance with all covenants under its credit agreements.

-16-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

8.    RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The cost to the company of its retirement plans is shown in the following table:
 Three Months Ended March 31
 Pension
Benefits
 Medical and
Life Benefits
$ in millions2018 2017 2018 2017
Components of net periodic benefit cost       
Service cost$99
 $97
 $5
 $5
Interest cost290
 313
 19
 21
Expected return on plan assets(529) (471) (25) (22)
Amortization of:       
Prior service credit(15) (15) (5) (5)
Net loss from previous years134
 191
 
 3
Net periodic benefit cost$(21) $115
 $(6) $2
Changes in Presentation
As discussed in Note 1, we adopted ASU 2017-07 on January 1, 2018 using the retrospective method, which changed the financial statement presentation of service costs and the other components of net periodic benefit cost. The service cost component continues to be included in operating income; however, the other components are now presented in Net FAS (non-service) pension benefit (expense) in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income. In addition, interest on service cost and plan administrative expenses which, in some cases, have historically been included in service cost are now consistently presented in the interest cost and amortization of net actuarial loss components, respectively. As a result, the company reclassified interest on service cost of $4 million and plan administrative expenses of $13 million from service cost to the interest cost and amortization of net actuarial loss components, respectively, for its pension plans in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to conform to the current year presentation. For the company’s medical and life benefit plans, plan administrative expenses of $1 million were reclassified from service cost to the amortization of net actuarial loss component for the three months ended March 31, 2017 to conform to the current year presentation. This change in presentation had no impact on net periodic benefit cost.
 Three Months Ended March 31
 Pension
Benefits
 OPB
$ in millions2019 2018 2019 2018
Components of net periodic benefit cost       
Service cost$92
 $99
 $4
 $5
Interest cost340
 290
 20
 19
Expected return on plan assets(525) (529) (23) (25)
Amortization of prior service credit(15) (15) (1) (5)
Net periodic benefit cost (benefit)$(108) $(155) $
 $(6)
Employer Contributions
The company sponsors defined benefit pension and post-retirementOPB plans, as well as defined contribution plans. We fund our defined benefit pension plans annually in a manner consistent with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended by the Pension Protection Act of 2006, including making voluntary contributions from time to time.

-14-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

2006.
Contributions made by the company to its retirement plans are as follows:
Three Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31
$ in millions2018 20172019 2018
Defined benefit pension plans$22
 $23
$23
 $22
Medical and life benefit plans11
 11
OPB plans12
 11
Defined contribution plans104
 99
191
 104
9.    STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS AND OTHER COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
Stock Awards
The following table presents the number of restricted stock rights (RSRs) and restricted performance stock rights (RPSRs) granted to employees under the company's long-term incentive stock plan and the grant date aggregate fair value of those stock awards for the periods presented:
 Three Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31
in millions 201820172019 2018
RSRs granted 0.1
0.1
0.1
 0.1
RPSRs granted 0.2
0.3
0.2
 0.2
Grant date aggregate fair value $87
$86
$91
 $87
RSRs typically vest on the third anniversary of the grant date, while RPSRs generally vest and pay out based on the achievement of financial metrics over a three-year period.

-17-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Cash Awards
The following table presents the minimum and maximum aggregate payout amounts related to cash units (CUs) and cash performance units (CPUs) granted to employees in the periods presented:
 Three Months Ended March 31 Three Months Ended March 31
$ in millions 20182017 20192018
Minimum aggregate payout amount $35
$35
 $36
$35
Maximum aggregate payout amount 196
198
 203
196
CUs typically vest and settle in cash on the third anniversary of the grant date, while CPUs generally vest and pay out in cash based on the achievement of financial metrics over a three-year period.
10.    LEASES
As described in Note 1, effective January 1, 2019, we adopted ASC 842 using the optional transition method. In accordance with the optional transition method, we did not recast the prior period unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and all prior period amounts and disclosures are presented under ASC 840. Finance leases are not material to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and are therefore not included in the following disclosures.
Total Lease Cost
Total lease cost is included in Product and Service costs and General and administrative expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statement of earnings and comprehensive income and is recorded net of immaterial sublease income. Total lease cost is comprised of the following:
$ in millions Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Operating lease cost $82
Variable lease cost 2
Short-term lease cost 17
Total lease cost $101
Supplemental Balance Sheet Information
Supplemental operating lease balance sheet information consists of the following:
$ in millions March 31, 2019
Operating lease right-of-use assets $1,283
   
Other current liabilities 229
Operating lease liabilities 1,098
Total operating lease liabilities $1,327
Other Supplemental Information
Other supplemental operating lease information consists of the following:
$ in millions Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities $84
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities 54
   
Weighted average remaining lease term 11.0 years
Weighted average discount rate 4.0%

-15--18-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Maturities of Lease Liabilities
Maturities of operating lease liabilities as of March 31, 2019 were as follows:
$ in millions  
Year Ending December 31  
2019(1)
 $208
2020 260
2021 207
2022 170
2023 134
Thereafter 737
Total lease payments 1,716
Less: imputed interest (389)
Present value of operating lease liabilities $1,327
(1)
Excludes the three months endedMarch 31, 2019.
As of March 31, 2019, we have a rental commitment of $226 million for a real estate lease that has not yet commenced. This operating lease is expected to commence in the fourth quarter of 2019 with a lease term of approximately 17 years.
Rental expense for operating leases classified under ASC 840 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was $92 million, net of immaterial amounts of sublease income. As of December 31, 2018, future minimum lease payments under long-term non-cancelable operating leases as classified under ASC 840 were as follows:
$ in millions
  
Year Ending December 31 
2019$312
2020270
2021221
2022186
2023152
Thereafter939
Total minimum lease payments$2,080

-19-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

10.11.    SEGMENT INFORMATION
The company is aligned in threefour operating sectors, which also comprise our reportable segments: Aerospace Systems, Innovation Systems, Mission Systems and Technology Services.
The following table presents sales and operating income by segment:
Three Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31
$ in millions2018 20172019 2018
Sales      
Aerospace Systems$3,280
 $2,984
$3,496
 $3,280
Innovation Systems1,438
 
Mission Systems2,883
 2,800
2,886
 2,883
Technology Services1,144
 1,190
977
 1,144
Intersegment eliminations(572) (564)(608) (572)
Total sales6,735
 6,410
8,189
 6,735
Operating income      
Aerospace Systems341
 323
382
 341
Innovation Systems167
 
Mission Systems371
 359
383
 371
Technology Services122
 129
102
 122
Intersegment eliminations(72) (70)(67) (72)
Total segment operating income762
 741
967
 762
Net FAS (service)/CAS pension adjustment127
 154
108
 127
Unallocated corporate expenses(34) (32)
Other(1) (1)
Unallocated corporate expense(139) (41)
Total operating income$854
 $862
$936
 $848
Net FAS (Service)/CAS Pension Adjustment
For financial statement purposes, we account for our employee pension plans in accordance with FAS. However, the cost of these plans is charged to our contracts in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the related U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards (CAS). The net FAS (service)/CAS pension adjustment reflects the difference between CAS pension expense included as cost in segment operating income and the service cost component of FAS expense included in total operating income. The non-service cost components of FAS expense, which include interest cost, expected return on plan assets, and amortization of prior service credit and net actuarial loss, are presented in Net FAS (non-service) pension benefit (expense) in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income as a result of our adoption of ASU 2017-07 discussed in Note 1.
Unallocated Corporate ExpensesExpense
Unallocated corporate expenses includeexpense includes the portion of corporate expensescosts not considered allowable or allocable under applicable CAS or FAR, and therefore not allocated to the segments. Such costs consist ofsegments, such as a portion of management and administration, legal, environmental, compensation, retiree benefits and other corporate unallowable costs. Unallocated corporate expense also includes costs not considered part of management’s evaluation of segment operating performance, such as amortization of purchased intangible assets and the additional depreciation expense related to the step-up in fair value of property, plant and equipment acquired through business combinations.

-16--20-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Disaggregation of Revenue
Sales by Customer TypeThree Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31
2018 20172019 2018
$ in millions$
%(3)
 $
%(3)
$
%(3)
 $
%(3)
Aerospace Systems          
U.S. Government(1)
$2,908
89% $2,553
86%
U.S. government (1)
$3,022
86% $2,908
89%
International(2)
271
8% 309
10%394
11% 271
8%
Other customers42
1% 38
1%34
1% 42
1%
Intersegment sales59
2% 84
3%46
2% 59
2%
Aerospace Systems sales3,280
100% 2,984
100%3,496
100% 3,280
100%
Innovation Systems     
U.S. government (1)
1,015
71% 

International (2)
247
17% 

Other customers114
8% 

Intersegment sales62
4% 

Innovation Systems sales1,438
100% 

Mission Systems          
U.S. Government(1)
2,190
76% 2,186
78%
U.S. government (1)
2,167
75% 2,190
76%
International(2)
379
13% 354
13%367
13% 379
13%
Other customers30
1% 21
1%34
1% 30
1%
Intersegment sales284
10% 239
8%318
11% 284
10%
Mission Systems sales2,883
100% 2,800
100%2,886
100% 2,883
100%
Technology Services          
U.S. Government(1)
602
53% 636
53%
U.S. government (1)
553
57% 602
53%
International(2)
220
19% 209
18%209
21% 220
19%
Other customers93
8% 104
9%33
3% 93
8%
Intersegment sales229
20% 241
20%182
19% 229
20%
Technology Services sales1,144
100% 1,190
100%977
100% 1,144
100%
Total          
U.S. Government(1)
5,700
85% 5,375
84%
U.S. government (1)
6,757
83% 5,700
85%
International(2)
870
13% 872
14%1,217
15% 870
13%
Other customers165
2% 163
2%215
2% 165
2%
Total sales$6,735
100% $6,410
100%
Total Sales$8,189
100% $6,735
100%
(1) 
Sales to the U.S. Governmentgovernment include sales from contracts for which we are the prime contractor, as well as those for which we are a subcontractor and the ultimate customer is the U.S. Government.government. Each of the company's segments derives substantial revenue from the U.S. Government.government.
(2) International sales include sales from contracts for which we are the prime contractor, as well as those for which we are a subcontractor and the ultimate customer is an international customer. These sales include foreign military sales contracted through the U.S. Government, direct sales with governments outside the U.S. and commercial sales with customers outside the U.S.government.
(3) Percentages calculated based on total segment sales.

-17--21-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Sales by Contract TypeThree Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31
2018 20172019 2018
$ in millions$
%(1)
 $
%(1)
$
%(1)
 $
%(1)
Aerospace Systems 
 
  
 
 
 
  
 
Cost-type$1,902
59% $1,827
63%$2,002
58% $1,902
59%
Fixed-price1,319
41% 1,073
37%1,448
42% 1,319
41%
Intersegment sales59
  84
 46
  59
 
Aerospace Systems sales3,280
  2,984
 3,496
  3,280
 
Innovation Systems     
Cost-type408
30% 

Fixed-price968
70% 

Intersegment sales62
  
 
Innovation Systems sales1,438
  
 
Mission Systems          
Cost-type1,279
49% 1,316
51%1,274
50% 1,279
49%
Fixed-price1,320
51% 1,245
49%1,294
50% 1,320
51%
Intersegment sales284
  239
 318
  284
 
Mission Systems sales2,883
  2,800
 2,886
  2,883
 
Technology Services 
 
  
 
     
Cost-type437
48% 445
47%392
49% 437
48%
Fixed-price478
52% 504
53%403
51% 478
52%
Intersegment sales229
  241
 182
  229
 
Technology Services sales1,144
  1,190
 977
  1,144
 
Total 
 
  
 
     
Cost-type3,618
54% 3,588
56%4,076
50% 3,618
54%
Fixed-price3,117
46% 2,822
44%4,113
50% 3,117
46%
Total sales$6,735
100% $6,410
100%
Total Sales$8,189
  $6,735
 
(1) 
Percentages calculated based on external customer sales.  

-18--22-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Sales by Geographic RegionThree Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31
201820172019 2018
$ in millions$
%(1)
 $
%(1)
$
%(2)
 $
%(2)
Aerospace Systems          
United States$2,950
92% $2,591
89%$3,056
89% $2,950
92%
Asia/Pacific129
4% 188
7%239
7% 129
4%
All other (principally Europe and Middle East)142
4% 121
4%
All other (1)
155
4% 142
4%
Intersegment sales59
  84
 46
  59
 
Aerospace Systems sales3,280
  2,984
 3,496
  3,280
 
Innovation Systems     
United States1,129
82% 

Asia/Pacific45
3% 

All other (1)
202
15% 

Intersegment sales62
  
 
Innovation Systems sales1,438
  
 
Mission Systems 
   
      
United States2,220
85% 2,207
86%2,201
86% 2,220
85%
Asia/Pacific153
6% 154
6%146
5% 153
6%
All other (principally Europe and Middle East)226
9% 200
8%
All other (1)
221
9% 226
9%
Intersegment sales284
  239
 318
  284
 
Mission Systems sales2,883
  2,800
 2,886
  2,883
 
Technology Services 
   
      
United States695
76% 741
78%586
74% 695
76%
Asia/Pacific32
3% 46
5%38
4% 32
3%
All other (principally Europe and Middle East)188
21% 162
17%
All other (1)
171
22% 188
21%
Intersegment sales229
  241
 182
  229
 
Technology Services sales1,144
  1,190
 977
  1,144
 
Total          
United States5,865
87% 5,539
86%6,972
85% 5,865
87%
Asia/Pacific314
5% 388
6%468
6% 314
5%
All other (principally Europe and Middle East)556
8% 483
8%
Total sales$6,735
100% $6,410
100%
All other (1)
749
9% 556
8%
Total Sales$8,189
  $6,735
 
(1)
All other is principally comprised of Europe and the Middle East.
(2) 
Percentages calculated based on external customer sales.  

-19-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

11.    RECAST 2017 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Our prior period financial statements were recast for the retrospective adoption of ASC Topic 606 and ASU 2017-07 as described in Note 1. The following tables summarize the effects of adopting these accounting standards on our unaudited condensed consolidated statement of earnings and comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and unaudited condensed consolidated statement of financial position as of December 31, 2017. The adoption of ASC Topic 606 did not have a material impact on our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity for the three months ended March 31, 2017.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
 Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
 As ReportedEffect of the Adoption ofAs Adjusted
$ in millions, except per share amounts 
ASC
Topic 606
 ASU 2017-07 
Sales       
Product$3,834
 $163
 $
 $3,997
Service2,433
 (20) 
 2,413
Total sales6,267
 143
 
 6,410
Operating costs and expenses       
Product2,871
 121
 (9) 2,983
Service1,887
 (14) (6) 1,867
General and administrative expenses677
 21
 
 698
Operating income832
 15
 15
 862
Other (expense) income       
Interest expense(75) 
 
 (75)
Net FAS (non-service) pension benefit (expense)
 
 (18) (18)
Other, net16
 
 3
 19
Earnings before income taxes773
 15
 
 788
Federal and foreign income tax expense133
 5
 
 138
Net earnings$640
 $10
 $
 $650
        
Basic earnings per share$3.66
 $0.06
 $
 $3.72
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, in millions174.8
 
 
 174.8
Diluted earnings per share$3.63
 $0.06
 $
 $3.69
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding, in millions176.1
 
 
 176.1
        
Net earnings (from above)$640
 $10
 $
 $650
Other comprehensive income       
Change in unamortized benefit plan costs, net of tax99
 
 
 99
Change in cumulative translation adjustment4
 
 
 4
Other, net2
 
 
 2
Other comprehensive income, net of tax105
 
 
 105
Comprehensive income$745
 $10
 $
 $755


-20-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
(Unaudited)
 December 31, 2017
 As ReportedEffect of the Adoption ofAs Adjusted
$ in millions 
ASC
Topic 606
 ASU 2017-07 
Assets       
Cash and cash equivalents$11,225
��$
 $
 $11,225
Accounts receivable, net829
 225
 
 1,054
Unbilled receivables, net3,147
 318
 
 3,465
Inventoried costs, net780
 (382) 
 398
Prepaid expenses and other current assets368
 77
 
 445
Total current assets16,349
 238
 
 16,587
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $5,066 for 20174,225
 
 
 4,225
Goodwill12,455
 
 
 12,455
Deferred tax assets475
 (28) 
 447
Other non-current assets1,413
 1
 
 1,414
Total assets$34,917
 $211
 $
 $35,128
        
Liabilities       
Trade accounts payable$1,661
 $
 $
 $1,661
Accrued employee compensation1,382
 
 
 1,382
Advance payments and amounts in excess of costs incurred1,617
 144
 
 1,761
Other current liabilities2,305
 (17) 
 2,288
Total current liabilities6,965
 127
 
 7,092
Long-term debt, net of current portion of $867 for 201714,399
 
 
 14,399
Pension and other post-retirement benefit plan liabilities5,511
 
 
 5,511
Other non-current liabilities994
 
 
 994
Total liabilities27,869
 127
 
 27,996
        
Commitments and contingencies (Note 7)      
        
Shareholders’ equity       
Preferred stock, $1 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
 
 
 
Common stock, $1 par value; 800,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding: 2017—174,085,619174
 
 
 174
Paid-in capital44
 
 
 44
Retained earnings11,548
 84
 
 11,632
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(4,718) 
 
 (4,718)
Total shareholders’ equity7,048
 84
 
 7,132
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity$34,917
 $211
 $
 $35,128

-21--23-


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Northrop Grumman Corporation
Falls Church, Virginia
Results of Review of Interim Financial Information
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated statement of financial position of Northrop Grumman Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of March 31, 2018,2019, and the related condensed consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in shareholders’ equity for the three-month periods ended March 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “interim financial information”). Based on our reviews,review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial information for it to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated statement of financial position of Northrop Grumman Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017,2018, and the related consolidated statements of earnings and comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended prior to retrospective adjustment for the change in the Company’s method of accounting for revenue transactions, (not presented herein); and in our report dated January 29, 2018,30, 2019, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. We also auditedstatements, which included an explanatory paragraph regarding the adjustments describedCompany’s change in Note 1its method of accounting for recognizing pension and presentedother postretirement benefit plans actuarial gains and losses and the manner in Note 11 that were applied to retrospectively adjust the December 31, 2017 consolidated statement of financial position of the Company (not presented herein).which it accounts for revenue from contracts with customers. In our opinion, such adjustments are appropriate and have been properly applied to the previously issued consolidated statement of financial position in deriving the accompanying retrospectively adjusted condensed consolidated statement of financial position as of December 31, 2017.2018, is consistent, in all material respects, with the audited consolidated financial statements from which it has been derived.
Basis for Review Results
This interim financial information is the responsibility of the Company’s management. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the PCAOB. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

/s/  Deloitte & Touche LLP
McLean, Virginia
April 24, 201823, 2019


-22--24-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
OVERVIEW
Northrop Grumman Corporation (herein referred to as “Northrop Grumman,” the “company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a leading global security company. We offer a broad portfolio of capabilities and technologies that enable us to deliver innovative products,platforms, systems and solutions for applications that range from undersea to outer space and into cyberspace. We provide products, systems and solutionscapabilities in autonomous systems; cyber; command, control, communications and computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C4ISR); space; strike; and logistics and modernization. We participate in many high-priority defense and government programs in the United States (U.S.) and abroad. We conduct most of our business with the U.S. Government,government, principally the Department of Defense (DoD) and intelligence community. We also conduct business with foreign, state and local governments, as well as commercial customers.
The following discussion should be read along with the financial statements included in this Form 10-Q, as well as our 20172018 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which provides additional information on our business and the environment in which we operate and our operating results. Our 2017 results have been recast to reflect the impact of the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2017-07, Compensation Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, using the full retrospective method.
Pending Acquisition of Orbital ATK
On September 17, 2017,June 6, 2018 (the “Merger date”), the company entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire all of the outstanding sharescompleted its previously announced acquisition of Orbital ATK, Inc. (Orbital ATK) for approximately $7.8 billion in cash, plus(“Orbital ATK”) (the “Merger”). On the assumption of approximately $1.4 billion in net debt (the “OrbitalMerger date, Orbital ATK Acquisition”). See Item 1.01 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 18, 2017 forbecame a summary and copywholly-owned subsidiary of the merger agreement. We believe this acquisition will enable uscompany and its name was changed to broaden our capabilities and offerings, create value for shareholders, provide expanded opportunities for our combined employees and enhance our ability to provide innovative solutions to meet our customers’ emerging requirements. Under the terms of the merger agreement, Orbital ATK shareholders are to receive all-cash consideration of $134.50 per share. We expect to fund the Orbital ATK Acquisition with the proceeds from our debt financing completed in October 2017 and cash on hand. On November 29, 2017, Orbital ATK shareholders approved the proposed Orbital ATK Acquisition. On February 12, 2018, the European Commission approved the proposed Orbital ATK Acquisition. We currently expect the transaction to close in the first half of 2018, after receiving regulatory approvals. Upon completion of the Orbital ATK Acquisition,Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, Inc., which we plan to establish Orbital ATKestablished as a new, fourth business sector named Northrop Grumman (“Innovation Systems.
Global Security and Economic Environment
Systems”). The following is an updateoperating results of events relatingInnovation Systems subsequent to the global security and economic environment sinceMerger date have been included in the filingcompany’s unaudited condensed consolidated results of our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The global security, geopolitical and economic environment continuesoperations. See Note 2 to be impacted by uncertainty. During the first quarter,financial statements for further information regarding the environment continued to be characterized by global and regional security threats from state and non-state actors as well as terrorist organizations and diverse regional security concerns. Additionally, economic tensions and changes in international trade policies, including higher tariffs on imported goods and materials and renegotiationacquisition of free trade agreements, could impact the global market for defense products, services and solutions.Orbital ATK.
U.S. Political and Economic Environment
The following is an update of events relating to the U.S. political and economic environment sinceSince the filing of our 20172018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
On February 9, 2018, Congress passed the Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA) of 2018, which extended the continuing resolution funding the government through March 23, 2018 and raised the statutory budget caps for defense spending, including for Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO), by $80 billion for FY 2018 and by $85 billion for FY 2019. The BBA also raised non-defense spending by $63 billion for FY 2018 and $68 billion10-K, full year appropriations for FY 2019 have been enacted for all remaining U.S. government agencies and suspended the debt ceiling until March 1, 2019.
On March 23, 2018, the President signed the Omnibus Appropriations Act for FY18, which provides $1.3 trillion in discretionary funding for federal agencies. In total forhas proposed a FY 2018, Congress appropriated approximately $7002020 budget requesting $750 billion for national security, including approximately $630which will be the subject of debate in Congress. The President’s budget request addresses various capabilities highlighted in the U.S. National Security Strategy, the National Defense Strategy and the Missile Defense Review. We believe our capabilities in space, missiles, missile defense, hypersonics, counter-hypersonics, survivability and cyber will allow us to continue to profitably grow our business in support of our customers’ needs.
CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS
Selected financial highlights are presented in the table below:
 Three Months Ended March 31 %
$ in millions, except per share amounts2019 2018 Change
Sales$8,189
 $6,735
 22%
Operating costs and expenses7,253
 5,887
 23%
Operating costs and expenses as a % of sales88.6% 87.4%  
Operating income936
 848
 10%
Operating margin rate11.4% 12.6%  
Federal and foreign income tax expense171
 159
 8%
Effective income tax rate16.5% 15.9%  
Net earnings863
 840
 3%
Diluted earnings per share$5.06
 $4.79
 6%
Sales
First quarter 2019 sales increased $1.5 billion primarily due to the addition of $1.4 billion of sales from Innovation Systems and higher sales at Aerospace Systems, partially offset by lower sales at Technology Services.
See “Segment Operating Results” below for base discretionary fundingfurther information by segment and approximately $70 billion in OCO funding.“Product and Service Analysis” for product and service detail. See Note 11 to the financial statements for information regarding the company’s sales by customer type, contract type and geographic region for each of our segments.

-23--25-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

The federal budgetOperating Income and debt ceiling are expectedMargin Rate
First quarter 2019 operating income increased $88 million, or 10 percent, primarily due to continuehigher segment operating income, including $167 million of operating income from Innovation Systems, partially offset by a $98 million increase in unallocated corporate expense due to be the subject of considerable debate, which could have a significant impact on defense spending broadlyintangible asset amortization and the company’s programs in particular.
Operating Performance Assessment and Reporting
We manage and assess our business based on our performance on contracts and programs (typically larger contracts or two or more closely-related contracts). We recognize salesPP&E step-up depreciation. First quarter 2019 operating margin rate declined to 11.4 percent from our portfolio of long-term contracts as control is transferred12.6 percent due to the customer, primarily over time on a cost-to-cost basis (cost incurred relative to cost estimated at completion). As a result, sales tend to fluctuateincrease in concert with costs incurred across our large portfolio of contracts. Due to Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) rules that govern our U.S. Government business and related Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), most types of costs are allocable to U.S. Government contracts. As such, we do not focus on individual cost groupings (such as manufacturing, engineering and design labor, subcontractor, material, overhead and generalunallocated corporate expense, partially offset by improved segment performance.
General and administrative (G&A) costs),costs as mucha percentage of sales for the first quarter of 2019 decreased to 9.3 percent from 10.6 percent primarily due to cost management and the addition of Innovation Systems at a lower G&A rate.
For information regarding product and service operating costs and expenses, see “Product and Service Analysis” below.
Federal and Foreign Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2019 increased to 16.5 percent from 15.9 percent in the first quarter of 2018. See Note 4 to the financial statements for additional information.
Net Earnings
Net earnings for the first quarter of 2019 increased $23 million primarily due to the increase in operating income, partially offset by a $54 million decrease in our FAS (non-service) pension benefit and the higher effective tax rate.
Diluted Earnings Per Share
Diluted earnings per share for the first quarter of 2019 increased $0.27, or 6 percent, reflecting a 3 percent increase in net earnings and a 3 percent reduction in weighted-average diluted shares outstanding.
SEGMENT OPERATING RESULTS
Basis of Presentation
The company is aligned in four operating sectors, which also comprise our reportable segments: Aerospace Systems, Innovation Systems, Mission Systems and Technology Services. As described above, on the effective date of the Merger, we established Innovation Systems as we do on total contract cost, which is the key driver of oura new, fourth business sector. The segment operating results below include sales and operating income.income for Innovation Systems subsequent to the Merger date.
We present our sectors in the following business areas, which are reported in a manner reflecting core capabilities:
Aerospace SystemsInnovation SystemsMission SystemsTechnology Services
Autonomous SystemsDefense SystemsAdvanced CapabilitiesGlobal Logistics and Modernization
Manned AircraftFlight SystemsCyber and ISRGlobal Services
SpaceSpace SystemsSensors and Processing
Effective January 1, 2019, the former Advanced Defense Services and System Modernization and Services business areas of Technology Services were merged to create the Global Services business area. This change had no impact on the segment operating results of Technology Services as a whole.
This section discusses segment sales, operating income and operating margin rates. In evaluating oursegment operating performance, we look primarily at changes in sales and operating income. Where applicable, significant fluctuations in operating performance attributable to individual contracts or programs, or changes in a specific cost element across multiple contracts, are described in our analysis. Based on this approach and the nature of our operations, the discussion of results of operations below first focuses on our threefour segments before distinguishing between products and services. Changes in sales are generally described in terms of volume, while changes in margin rates are generally described in terms of performance and/or contract mix. For purposes of this discussion, volume generally refers to increases or decreases in sales or cost from production/service activity levels. Performancelevels and performance generally refers to non-volume related changes in profitability. Contract mix generally refers to changes in the ratio of contract type and/or lifecycle (e.g., cost-type, fixed-price, development, production, and/or sustainment).
CONSOLIDATED OPERATING RESULTS
Selected financial highlights are presented in the table below:
 Three Months Ended March 31 %
$ in millions, except per share amounts2018 2017 Change
Sales$6,735
 $6,410
 5 %
Operating costs and expenses5,881
 5,548
 6 %
Operating costs and expenses as a % of sales87.3% 86.6%  
Operating income854
 862
 (1)%
Operating margin rate12.7% 13.4%  
Federal and foreign income tax expense132
 138
 (4)%
Effective income tax rate15.2% 17.5%  
Net earnings739
 650
 14 %
Diluted earnings per share$4.21
 $3.69
 14 %
Sales
Sales for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $325 million, or 5 percent, as compared with the same period in 2017, due to higher sales at Aerospace Systems and Mission Systems, partially offset by lower sales at Technology Services.
See “Segment Operating Results” below for further information by segment and “Product and Service Analysis” for product and service detail. See Note 10 to the financial statements for information regarding the company’s sales by customer type, contract type and geographic region for each of our segments.
Operating Income
Operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 decreased $8 million, or 1 percent, as compared with the same period in 2017, primarily due to a $27 million decrease in our net FAS (service)/CAS pension adjustment, partially offset by a $21 million increase in segment operating income. Higher operating costs and expenses as a percentage of sales reduced our operating margin rate to 12.7 percent from 13.4 percent in the prior year period and was principally driven by the decrease in our net FAS (service)/CAS pension adjustment and a lower segment operating margin rate as described in “Segment Operating Results.”

-24--26-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

G&A as a percentage of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2018 decreased to 10.6 percent from 10.9 percent in the prior year period primarily due to higher sales.
For further information regarding product and service operating costs and expenses, see “Product and Service Analysis” below.
Federal and Foreign Income Taxes
Our effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2018 was lower than the same period in 2017, as discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements.
Net Earnings
Net earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $89 million, or 14 percent, as compared with the same period in 2017, primarily due to a $138 million increase in our net FAS (non-service) pension benefit, $31 million of higher interest income on short-term investments and $21 million of higher segment operating income. These increases were partially offset by $68 million of higher interest expense on long-term debt and a $27 million reduction in our net FAS (service)/CAS pension adjustment.
Diluted Earnings Per Share
Diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $0.52, or 14 percent, as compared with the same period in 2017, primarily due to the 14 percent increase in net earnings discussed above.
SEGMENT OPERATING RESULTS
Basis of Presentation
The company is aligned in three operating sectors, which also comprise our reportable segments: Aerospace Systems, Mission Systems and Technology Services.
We present our sectors in the following business areas, which are reported in a manner reflecting core capabilities:
Aerospace SystemsMission SystemsTechnology Services
Autonomous SystemsSensors and ProcessingGlobal Logistics and Modernization
Manned AircraftCyber and ISRAdvanced Defense Services
SpaceAdvanced CapabilitiesSystem Modernization and Services
This section discusses segment sales, operating income and operating margin rates. A reconciliation of segment operating income to total operating income is provided below.
Segment Operating Income and Margin Rate
Segment operating income, as reconciled in the Reconciliation of Segment Operating Income to Total Operating Income sectiontable below, is aand segment operating margin rate (segment operating income divided by sales) are non-GAAP (accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America) measuremeasures that reflectsreflect total earnings from our threefour segments, including allocated pension expense recognized under CAS,the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and the related U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), and excluding FAS pension expense and unallocated corporate itemsexpenses (certain corporate-level expenses, which are not considered allowable or allocable under applicable CAS or FAR, and FAS pension expense. This measurecosts not considered part of management’s evaluation of segment operating performance). These non-GAAP measures may be useful to investors and other users of our financial statements as a supplemental measuremeasures in evaluating the financial performance and operational trends of our sectors. This measureThese measures may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner and should not be considered in isolation or as an alternativealternatives to operating results presented in accordance with GAAP.
Three Months Ended March 31 %Three Months Ended March 31 %
$ in millions2018 2017 Change2019 2018 Change
Segment operating income$762
 $741
 3%$967
 $762
 27 %
Segment operating margin rate11.3% 11.6%  11.8% 11.3%  
CAS pension expense200
 226
 (12)%
Less: FAS (service) pension expense(92) (99) (7)%
Net FAS (service)/CAS pension adjustment108
 127
 (15)%
Intangible asset amortization and PP&E step-up depreciation(96) 
 NM
Other unallocated corporate expense(43) (41) 5 %
Unallocated corporate expense(139) (41) 239 %
Operating income$936
 $848
 10 %
SegmentFirst quarter 2019 segment operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $21$205 million, or 327 percent, as compared withprimarily due to the same period in 2017 as a resultaddition of $167 million of operating income from Innovation Systems and higher sales volume, which more than offset a lower segment operating margin rate.income at Aerospace Systems. Segment operating margin rate decreased principallyincreased due to a lower segment margin rateimproved performance at Aerospace Systems as described below.

-25-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Reconciliation of Segment Operating Income to Total Operating Income - The table below reconciles segment operating income to total operating income by including the impact of the net FAS (service)/CAS pension adjustment, as well as unallocated corporate expenses (certain corporate-level expenses, which are not considered allowable or allocable under applicable CAS or the FAR). See Note 10 to the financial statements for further information on the net FAS (service)/CAS pension adjustment and unallocated corporate expenses.Mission Systems.
 Three Months Ended March 31
$ in millions2018 2017
Segment operating income$762
 $741
CAS pension expense226
 251
Less: FAS (service) pension expense(99) (97)
Net FAS (service)/CAS pension adjustment127
 154
Unallocated corporate expenses(34) (32)
Other(1) (1)
Total operating income$854
 $862
Net FAS (service)/CAS Pension Adjustment
The decrease in our net FAS (service)/CAS pension adjustment forduring the three months ended March 31, 2018, as compared with the same period in 2017,first quarter of 2019 is primarily due to lower CAS expense resulting from higher asset returnslargely as a result of changes in 2017 and a change in our mortality assumptionactuarial assumptions as of December 31, 2017.2018, partially offset by increased CAS expense due to the addition of Innovation Systems.
Unallocated Corporate ExpensesExpense
UnallocatedThe increase in unallocated corporate expenses forexpense during the three months ended March 31, 2018 were comparable with the prior year period.first quarter of 2019 is primarily due to $96 million of intangible asset amortization and PP&E step-up depreciation.
Net EACEstimate-at-Completion (EAC) Adjustments - We record changes in estimated contract earnings at completion (net EAC adjustments) using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting. Net EAC adjustments can have a significant effect on reported sales and operating income and the aggregate amounts are presented in the table below:
Three Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31
$ in millions2018 20172019 2018
Favorable EAC adjustments$207
 $182
$235
 $207
Unfavorable EAC adjustments(91) (41)(97) (91)
Net EAC adjustments$116
 $141
$138
 $116

-27-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Net EAC adjustments by segment are presented in the table below:
Three Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31
$ in millions2018 20172019 2018
Aerospace Systems$54
 $53
$50
 $54
Innovation Systems(1)
50
 
Mission Systems45
 62
30
 45
Technology Services22
 31
11
 22
Eliminations(5) (5)(3) (5)
Net EAC adjustments$116
 $141
$138
 $116
(1)
Amounts reflect EAC adjustments after the percent complete on Innovation Systems contracts was reset to zero as of the Merger date.
For purposes of the discussion in the remainder of this Segment Operating Results section, references to operating income and operating margin rate reflect segment operating income and segment operating margin rate, respectively.
AEROSPACE SYSTEMSThree Months Ended March 31 %
$ in millions2019 2018 Change
Sales$3,496
 $3,280
 7%
Operating income382
 341
 12%
Operating margin rate10.9% 10.4%  
Sales
First quarter 2019 sales increased $216 million, or 7 percent, due to higher sales in all three business areas. Manned Aircraft sales reflect higher volume on restricted, F-35 and E-2D programs. Autonomous Systems sales increased due to higher volume on several programs, including Triton, partially offset by lower NATO AGS volume as that program nears completion. Space sales reflect higher volume on a secure communications satellite program.
Operating Income
First quarter 2019 operating income increased $41 million, or 12 percent, due to higher sales and a higher operating margin rate. Operating margin rate increased to 10.9 percent from 10.4 percent principally due to improved performance on Manned Aircraft and Autonomous Systems programs, partially offset by the timing of risk retirements and changes in contract mix on Space programs.
INNOVATION SYSTEMSThree Months Ended March 31 %
$ in millions2019 2018 Change
Sales$1,438
 
 
Operating income167
 
 
Operating margin rate11.6% 
  
The sales and operating income above reflect the operating results of Innovation Systems subsequent to the Merger date.In our comparative discussion below, we reference pro forma sales prepared in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X and computed as if Orbital ATK had been included in our results in the year prior to the Merger, or as of January 1, 2017. Refer to Note 2 to the financial statements for additional supplemental consolidated pro forma financial information. This pro forma financial information should not be considered indicative of the results that would have actually occurred if the Merger had been consummated on January 1, 2017, nor are they indicative of future results.
Sales
First quarter 2019 sales increased $126 million, or 10 percent, compared with pro forma sales of $1.3 billion in the first quarter of 2018, due to higher sales in all three business areas. Space Systems sales reflect higher volume on national security satellite systems. Defense Systems sales increased due to higher volume on tactical missiles and subsystems, including the Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM) program, and precision munitions

-26--28-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

AEROSPACE SYSTEMSThree Months Ended March 31 %
$ in millions2018 2017 Change
Sales$3,280
 $2,984
 10%
Operating income341
 323
 6%
Operating margin rate10.4% 10.8%  
Aerospace Systemsand armament products, partially offset by lower sales for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $296 million, or 10 percent, as compared with the same period in 2017, due to higher volume on Manned Aircraft programs, as well as Autonomous Systems and Space programs. Manned Aircraft sales were driven by higher restricted, F-35 and E-2D Advanced Hawkeye volume. Autonomousammunition products. Flight Systems sales reflect higher volume on launch vehicles, principally Ground-based Midcourse Defense, and aerospace structures.
Operating Income
First quarter 2019 operating income totaled $167 million and operating margin rate was 11.6 percent. First quarter results benefited from the Fire Scouttiming of favorable negotiations on certain commercial contracts.
MISSION SYSTEMSThree Months Ended March 31%
$ in millions2019 2018 Change
Sales$2,886
 $2,883
 %
Operating income383
 371
 3%
Operating margin rate13.3% 12.9%  
Sales
First quarter 2019 sales were comparable to the first quarter of 2018, and Tritonreflect higher Cyber and ISR volume, offset by lower Advanced Capabilities and Sensors and Processing volume. Cyber and ISR sales increased principally due to higher volume on space payloads and mission programs. Advanced Capabilities sales decreased due to lower missile defense volume, primarily related to the JRDC program, which completed during the first quarter of 2018, partially offset by higher volume on advanced technology restricted programs. Sensors and Processing sales reflect lower volume on targeting programs and communications programs, partially offset by higher restricted volume.
Operating Income
First quarter 2019 operating income increased $12 million, or 3 percent, due to a higher operating margin rate. Operating margin rate increased to 13.3 percent from 12.9 percent, primarily due to improved performance on Advanced Capabilities and Sensors and Processing programs, partially offset by lower performance on Cyber and ISR programs.
TECHNOLOGY SERVICESThree Months Ended March 31 %
$ in millions2019 2018 Change
Sales$977
 $1,144
 (15)%
Operating income102
 122
 (16)%
Operating margin rate10.4% 10.7%  
Sales
First quarter 2019 sales declined $167 million, or 15 percent, primarily due to program completions across the sector. Global Hawk volume. SpaceServices sales reflect higher restricteddeclined principally due to the completion of a state and Ground Based Strategic Deterrent volume,local services contract and certain defense services contracts, largely the JRDC program. Global Logistics and Modernization sales declined primarily due to the completion of a manned aircraft sustainment program, KC-10, partially offset by lower intercompany, James Webb Space Telescopesales growth on strategic and Advanced Extremely High Frequency volume.electronic systems sustainment programs.
Operating Income
First quarter 2019 operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $18declined $20 million, or 616 percent, as compared with the same period in 2017, primarily due to higherlower sales. Operating margin rate decreased to 10.4 percent primarily due to a non-programmatic benefit recognized during the first quarter of 2017 and higher volume on early phase development programs in 2018.
MISSION SYSTEMSThree Months Ended March 31 %
$ in millions2018 2017 Change
Sales$2,883
 $2,800
 3%
Operating income371
 359
 3%
Operating margin rate12.9% 12.8%  
Mission Systems sales for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $83 million, or 3 percent, as compared with the same period in 2017, primarily due to higher Sensors and Processing volume, partially offset by lower Cyber and ISR volume. Sensors and Processing sales increased principally due to higher volume on electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) self-protection and targeting programs, F-35 sensors and restricted programs. Cyber and ISR sales decreased primarily due to lower volume on restricted ISR programs. Advanced Capabilities sales were comparable with the prior year period.
Operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $12 million, or 3 percent, as compared with the same period in 2017, primarily due to the higher sales described above. Operating margin rate was comparable with the prior year period.
TECHNOLOGY SERVICESThree Months Ended March 31 %
$ in millions2018 2017 Change
Sales$1,144
 $1,190
 (4)%
Operating income122
 129
 (5)%
Operating margin rate10.7% 10.8%  
Technology Services sales for the three months ended March 31, 2018 decreased $46 million, or 4 percent, as compared with the same period in 2017, primarily due to lower volume on System Modernization and Services and Advanced Defense Services programs, partially offset by higher volume on Global Logistics and Modernization programs. System Modernization and Services and Advanced Defense Services sales decreased primarily due to the completion of several programs in 2017, partially offset by higher volume on the Saudi Arabian Ministry of National Guard Training Support program (through our interest in a joint venture for which we consolidate the financial results). Global Logistics and Modernization sales increased primarily due to higher volume for several programs, including the Special Electronic Mission Aircraft program, partially offset by lower volume from the KC-10 program as our contract nears completion.10.7 percent.

-27--29-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Operating income for the three months ended March 31, 2018 decreased $7 million, or 5 percent, as compared with the same period in 2017, primarily due to the lower sales described above. Operating margin rate was comparable with the prior year period.
PRODUCT AND SERVICE ANALYSIS
The following table presents product and service sales and operating costs and expenses by segment:
Three Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31
$ in millions2018201720192018
Segment Information:SalesOperating Costs and ExpensesSalesOperating Costs and ExpensesSalesOperating Costs and ExpensesSalesOperating Costs and Expenses
Aerospace Systems  
Product$2,974
$2,652
$2,751
$2,465
Service522
462
529
474
Innovation Systems 
Product$2,751
$2,465
$2,480
$2,204
1,240
1,096


Service529
474
504
457
198
175


Mission Systems  
Product1,719
1,476
1,722
1,485
1,784
1,523
1,719
1,476
Service1,164
1,036
1,078
956
1,102
980
1,164
1,036
Technology Services  
Product106
97
75
70
123
116
106
97
Service1,038
925
1,115
991
854
759
1,038
925
Segment Totals    
Total Product$4,576
$4,038
$4,277
$3,759
$6,121
$5,387
$4,576
$4,038
Total Service2,731
2,435
2,697
2,404
2,676
2,376
2,731
2,435
Intersegment eliminations(572)(500)(564)(494)(608)(541)(572)(500)
Total segment(1)
$6,735
$5,973
$6,410
$5,669
$8,189
$7,222
$6,735
$5,973
(1) 
A reconciliation of segment operating income to total operating income is included in “Segment Operating Results.”
Product Sales and Costs
ProductFirst quarter 2019 product sales for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $299 million,$1.5 billion, or 7 percent, as compared with the same period in 2017.34 percent. The increase was primarily due to the addition of $1.2 billion of product sales from Innovation Systems and higher restricted F-35 and E-2D Advanced HawkeyeF-35 volume at Aerospace Systems.
ProductFirst quarter 2019 product costs for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $279 million,$1.3 billion, or 733 percent, as compared with the same period in 2017, consistent with the change inhigher product sales described above.above and reflects higher product margin rates at Mission Systems and Aerospace Systems.
Service Sales and Costs
ServiceFirst quarter 2019 service sales for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $34decreased $55 million, or 1 percent, as compared with the same period in 2017.2 percent. The increasedecrease was primarily driven by higher service volume on several Sensors and Processing programs at Mission Systems, partially offset by lower service sales at Technology Services and Mission Systems principally due to several program completions, partially offset by the completionaddition of several programs in 2017.$198 million of service sales from Innovation Systems.
ServiceFirst quarter 2019 service costs for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $31decreased $59 million, or 12 percent, as compared with the same period in 2017, consistent with the change inlower service sales described above.above and reflects higher service margin rates at Aerospace Systems.
BACKLOG
Backlog represents the future sales we expect to recognize on firm orders received by the company and is equivalent to the company’s remaining performance obligations at the end of each period. It comprises both funded backlog (firm orders for which funding is authorized and appropriated) and unfunded backlog. Unexercised contract options and indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts are not included in backlog until the time the option or IDIQ task order is exercised or awarded. Backlog is converted into sales primarily as costs are incurred.incurred or deliveries are made.
Company backlogBacklog consisted of the following as of March 31, 20182019 and December 31, 2017 was $42.3 billion and $42.6 billion, respectively. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, we adopted ASC Topic 606 on January 1, 2018 using the full retrospective method and applied the transition practical expedient related to backlog for reporting periods presented2018:

-28--30-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

before the date of initial application. However,
  March 31, 2019 2018  
$ in millions Funded Unfunded Total
Backlog
 
Total
Backlog
 % Change in 2019
Aerospace Systems $12,269
 $15,841
 $28,110
 $26,440
 6 %
Innovation Systems 5,623
 2,478
 8,101
 8,207
 (1)%
Mission Systems 11,073
 6,767
 17,840
 15,408
 16 %
Technology Services 2,797
 487
 3,284
 3,445
 (5)%
Total backlog $31,762
 $25,573
 $57,335
 $53,500
 7 %
New Awards
First quarter 2019 net awards totaled $12.3 billion. Significant new awards include $3.2 billion for comparative purposes, we have recast our backlog as of December 31, 2017 to reflect the impact of adoption of ASC Topic 606.restricted space, $1.0 billion for submarine subsystems production, $805 million for F-35, $633 million for IBCS - Poland and $323 million for AARGM-ER.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We endeavor to ensure the most efficient conversion of operating income into cash for deployment in our business and to maximize shareholder value through cash deployment activities. In addition to our cash position, we use various financial measures to assist in capital deployment decision-making, including cash used inprovided by operating activities and free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure described in more detail below.
Cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from operating activities, supplemented by borrowings under credit facilities, commercial paper and/or in the capital markets, if needed, are expected to be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next 12 months.
Operating Cash Flow
The table below summarizes key components of cash flow used in operating activities:
Three Months Ended March 31Three Months Ended March 31 %
$ in millions2018 20172019 2018 Change
Net earnings$739
 $650
$863
 $840
 3 %
Non-cash items(1)
86
 112
361
 119
 203 %
Changes in assets and liabilities:        
Trade working capital(1,008) (1,267)(1,964) (1,008) 95 %
Retiree benefits(56) 86
(142) (190) (25)%
Other, net2
 (20)(31) 2
 NM
Net cash used in operating activities$(237) $(439)$(913) $(237) (285)%
(1) 
Includes depreciation and amortization, non-cash lease expense, stock based compensation expense and deferred income taxes.
Net cash used in operating activities forduring the three months ended March 31, 2018 decreased $202first quarter of 2019 increased $676 million, as compared with the same period in 2017, principally due to higher net earnings and changes in trade working capital. The net useThese changes reflect the completion of an ERP conversion as well as the inclusion of Innovation Systems. Although successfully completed, the ERP conversion delayed billings and cash receipts of approximately $350 million, which the company expects will be recovered in the second quarter of 2019. Innovation Systems used approximately $250 million of operating cash during the firstquarter. First quarter iscash trends are generally consistent with the company’s historical timing ofprior years where operating cash flows which are generally morehave been heavily weighted toward the second half of the year.
Free Cash Flow
Free cash flow, as reconciled in the table below, is a non-GAAP measure defined as net cash used in operating activities less capital expenditures, and may not be defined and calculated by other companies in the same manner. We use free cash flow as a key factor in our planning for, and consideration of, acquisitions, stock repurchases, and the payment of dividends.dividends and stock repurchases. This non-GAAP measure may be useful to investors and other users of our financial statements as a supplemental measure of our cash performance, but should not be considered in isolation, as a measure of residual cash flow available for discretionary purposes, or as an alternative to operating cash flows presented in accordance with GAAP.
The table below reconciles net cash used in operating activities to free cash flow:
 Three Months Ended March 31
$ in millions2018 2017
Net cash used in operating activities$(237) $(439)
Less: capital expenditures(305) (216)
Free cash flow$(542) $(655)
Free cash flow for the three months ended March 31, 2018 increased $113 million, as compared with the same period in 2017, principally due to the decrease in net cash used in operating activities described above, partially offset by higher capital expenditures at Aerospace Systems.

-29--31-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

The table below reconciles net cash used in operating activities to free cash flow:
 Three Months Ended March 31 %
$ in millions2019 2018 Change
Net cash used in operating activities$(913) $(237) (285)%
Less: capital expenditures(284) (305) (7)%
Free cash flow$(1,197) $(542) (121)%
First quarter 2019 free cash flow decreased $655 million, principally due to the increase in net cash used in operating activities.
Investing Cash Flow
Net cash used in investing activities forduring the three months ended March 31, 2018 increasedfirst quarter of 2019 decreased to $307$280 million from $214$307 million in the prior year period principally due to the higherlower capital expenditures described above.expenditures.
Financing Cash Flow
Net cash provided by financing activities during the first quarter of 2019 was $462 million, as compared to net cash used in financing activities of $312 million for the three months ended March 31,same period in 2018, decreased to $312 million from $485 million in the prior year period. The decrease was primarily due to $229 millionprincipally driven by net commercial paper borrowings of share repurchases in the first quarter of 2017 compared to no share repurchases in the first quarter of 2018.$814 million.
Credit Facilities, Commercial Paper and Financial Arrangements - See Note 7 to the financial statements for further information on our credit facilities, commercial paper and our use of standby letters of credit and guarantees.
Share Repurchases - See Note 3 to the financial statements for further information on our share repurchase programs.
Unsecured Senior NotesLong-term Debt - See Note 5 to the financial statements for further information.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES, ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
Effective January 1,There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies, estimates or judgments from those discussed in our 2018 we adopted ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, using the full retrospective method. ASC Topic 606 supersedes previous revenue recognition guidance, including ASC 605-35, Revenue Recognition - Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts, and outlines a single set of comprehensive principles for recognizing revenue under GAAP. Under ASC Topic 606, revenue is recognized as control transfers to the customer. As such, under the new standard, revenue for our contracts is generally recognized over time using the cost-to-cost method, which is consistent with the revenue recognition model used for the majority of our contracts prior to the adoption of ASC Topic 606. In most cases the accounting for those contracts where we previously recognized revenue as units were delivered has changed under ASC Topic 606 such that we now recognize revenue as costs are incurred. In addition, for certain of our contracts, there is a change in the number of performance obligations under ASC Topic 606, which has altered the timing of revenue and margin recognition. See “Revenue Recognition” in Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information regarding our revenue recognition accounting policies.Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS UPDATES
See Note 1 to our financial statements for further information on accounting standards updates.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND PROJECTIONS
This Form 10-Q and the information we are incorporating by reference contain statements other than statements of historical fact, that constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “may,” “could,” “should,” “plan,” “project,” “forecast,” “believe,” “estimate,” “outlook,” “anticipate,” “trends,” “goals” and similar expressions generally identify these forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements relating to our future financial condition, results of operations and/or cash flows. Forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions, expectations, plans and projections that we believe to be reasonable when made, but which may change over time. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and inherently involve a wide range of risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Specific risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those identified and discussed more fully in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our 20172018 Annual Report on Form 10-K and from time to time in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). They include:
our dependence on the U.S. Governmentgovernment for a substantial portion of our business
significant delays or reductions in appropriations for our programs and U.S. Governmentgovernment funding more broadly
investigations, claims, disputes, enforcement actions and/or litigation
the use of estimates when accounting for our contracts and the effect of contract cost growth and/or changes in estimated contract revenues and costs
our exposure to additional risks as a result of our international business, including risks related to geopolitical and economic factors, laws and regulations

-30--32-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

the improper conduct of employees, agents, subcontractors, suppliers, business partners or joint ventures in which we participate and the impact on our reputation, our ability to do business, and our financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows
cyber and other security threats or disruptions faced by us, our customers or our suppliers and other partners
the performance and financial viability of our subcontractors and suppliers and the availability and pricing of raw materials, chemicals and components
changes in procurement and other laws, regulations and practices applicable to our industry, findings by the U.S. Governmentgovernment as to our compliance with such laws and regulations, and changes in our customers’ business practices globally
increased competition within our markets and bid protests
the ability to maintain a qualified workforce
our ability to meet performance obligations under our contracts, including obligations that are technologically complex, require certain manufacturing expertise or are dependent on factors not wholly within our control
environmental matters, including unforeseen environmental costs and government and third party claims
natural and/or environmental disasters
the adequacy and availability of our insurance coverage, customer indemnifications or other liability protections
products and services we provide related to hazardous and high risk operations, including the production and use of such products, which subject us to various environmental, regulatory, financial, reputational and other risks
the future investment performance of plan assets, changes in actuarial assumptions associated with our pension and other post-retirementpostretirement benefit plans and legislative or other regulatory actions impacting our pension, post-retirementpostretirement and health and welfare plans
the satisfaction of conditions (including regulatory approvals) to and successful consummation of the Orbital ATK Acquisition; our ability successfully to integrate the Orbital ATK business and realize fully the anticipated benefits of the acquisition, without adverse consequences
our ability to exploit or protect intellectual property rights
our ability to develop new products and technologies and maintain technologies, facilities, and equipment to win new competitions and meet the needs of our customers
changes in business conditions that could impact business investments and/or recorded goodwill or the value of other long-lived assets
unanticipated changes in our tax provisions or exposure to additional tax liabilities, including qualification of the Alliant Techsystems Inc. spin-off of Vista Outdoor Inc. as a tax-free transaction
Additional information regarding these risks and other important factors can be found in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K and as disclosed in this report and from time to time in our other filings with the SEC.
You are urged to consider the limitations on, and risks associated with, forward-looking statements and not unduly rely on the accuracy of forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date this report is first filed or, in the case of any document incorporated by reference, the date of that document. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
There have been no material changes to our contractual obligations from those discussed in our 20172018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes to our market risks from those discussed in our 20172018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

-31--33-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our principal executive officer (Chairman(Chief Executive Officer and Chief Executive Officer)President) and principal financial officer (Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer) have evaluated the company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) as of March 31, 2018,2019, and have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. These disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
As part of our ongoing integration of Northrop Grumman Innovation Systems, we have integrated certain controls and related procedures for legacy Orbital ATK with those of legacy Northrop Grumman. During the three months ended March 31, 2018,2019, no changechanges occurred in our internal controlscontrol over financial reporting that materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controlscontrol over financial reporting.

-32--34-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
We have provided information about certain legal proceedings in which we are involved in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and updated that information in Notes 6 and 7 to the financial statements.
We are a party to various investigations, lawsuits, arbitration, claims, enforcement actions and other legal proceedings, including government investigations and claims, that arise in the ordinary course of our business. These types of matters could result in administrative, civil or criminal fines, penalties or other sanctions (which terms include judgments or convictions and consent or other voluntary decrees or agreements); compensatory, treble or other damages; non-monetary relief or actions; or other liabilities. Government regulations provide that certain allegations against a contractor may lead to suspension or debarment from future government contracts or suspension of export privileges for the company or one or more of its components. The nature of legal proceedings is such that we cannot assure the outcome of any particular matter. However, basedFor additional information on information available to us to date and other than as noted in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated bypending matters, please see Notes 6 and 7 to the financial statements, in this report, we do not believe that the outcome of any matter currently pending against the company is likely to have a material adverse effect on the company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial position as of March 31, 2018 or its annual results of operations and/or cash flows. Forand for further information on the risks we face from existing and future investigations, lawsuits, arbitration, claims, enforcement actions and other legal proceedings, please see “Risk Factors” in our 20172018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
For a discussion of our risk factors please see the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our 20172018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
We had noPurchases of Equity Securities – The table below summarizes our repurchases of common stock during the three months ended March 31, 2018. The approximate dollar valuefirst quarter of shares that may yet be purchased under the company’s share repurchase authorization is $2.3 billion as of March 31, 2018.2019:
PeriodNumber
of Shares
Purchased
 
Average Price
Paid per
Share
(1)(2)
 Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
 Approximate
Dollar Value of
Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
under the
Plans or Programs
($ in millions)
January 1, 2019 - January 25, 2019876,678
 
NM(2)

 876,678
  $4,084
January 26, 2019 - February 22, 201975,264
 $282.15
 75,264
  4,063
February 23, 2019 - March 29, 2019153,777
 275.40
 153,777
  4,021
Total1,105,719
 
NM(2)

 1,105,719
  $4,021
(1)
Includes commissions paid.
(2)
In October 2018, the company entered into an accelerated share repurchase (ASR) agreement with Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC, which was completed in January 2019 with a final delivery of 0.9 million shares. Pursuant to the terms of the ASR, a total of approximately 3.9 million shares of our common stock were repurchased with an average final purchase price of $260.32 per share.
Share repurchases take place from time to time, subject to market conditions and management’s discretion, in the open market orand in privately negotiated transactions. The company retires its common stock upon repurchase.repurchase and, in the periods presented, has not made any purchases of common stock other than in connection with these publicly announced repurchase programs.
See Note 3 to the financial statements for further information on our share repurchase programs.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
No information is required in response to this item.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
No information is required in response to this item.
Item 5. Other Information
No information is required in response to this item.

-33--35-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

Item 6. Exhibits
2.1
  
2.2
  
2.3
2.4
  
+*+10.1
  
+*+10.2
  
+*+10.3
  
+*12(a)10.4
+*10.5
  
*15
  
*31.1
  
*31.2
  
**32.1
  
**32.2
  
*101Northrop Grumman Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2018,2019, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings and Comprehensive Income, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, and (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
+Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
  
*Filed with this report
  
**Furnished with this report

-34--36-

Table of Contents

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION                        

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
(Registrant)
  
By:
 
 /s/ Michael A. Hardesty
  
Michael A. Hardesty
Corporate Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: April 24, 201823, 2019

-35--37-