UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013
 
 
Commission
File Number
 
Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter,
State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation,
Address of Principal Executive Offices, Zip Code
and Telephone Number (Including Area Code)
 
I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number
 
 
 
333-147019,
333-182599, and
333-179941-01
 
PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
a Delaware corporation
101 Second Street, 15th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415)593-5400
 73-1733867
 
 
333-179941 
PROSPER FUNDING LLC
a Delaware limited liability company
101 Second Street, 15th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415)593-5479
 45-4526070
 
Indicate by check mark whether each registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Yes x No ¨
Prosper Funding LLC
Yes x No ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Yes x No ¨
Prosper Funding LLC
Yes x No ¨
 


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 
 
Large
Accelerated
Filer
 
Accelerated
Filer
 
Non-
Accelerated
Filer
 
Smaller
Reporting
Company
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
 
¨o
 
¨o
 
¨o
 
x
Prosper Funding LLC
 
¨o
 
¨o
 
¨o
 
x
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
 
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Yes ¨ No x
Prosper Funding LLC
Yes ¨ No x


Prosper Funding LLC meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form 10-Q with the reduced disclosure format specified in General Instruction H(2) of Form 10-Q.

Registrant
 
Number of Shares of Common
Stock of the Registrant
Outstanding at  Aug 13,November 11, 2013
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
 
65,708,36513,751,076
($.001.01 par value)
Prosper Funding LLC
 
None

THIS COMBINED FORM 10-Q IS SEPARATELY FILED BY PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC. AND PROSPER FUNDING LLC.  INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN RELATING TO ANY INDIVIDUAL REGISTRANT IS FILED BY SUCH REGISTRANT ON ITS OWN BEHALF. EACH REGISTRANT MAKES NO REPRESENTATION AS TO INFORMATION RELATING TO THE OTHER REGISTRANT.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
Page No.
i
1
 
Prosper Marketplace, Inc.Condensed Consolidated
 
1
2
3
4
5
Prosper Funding LLCSchedule 1
Condensed
 
1920
2021
2122
2223
Item 2.2830
Item 3.4749
Item 4.4749
PART II.OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1.4950
Item 1A.4950
Item 2.4950
Item 3.4950
Item 4.4950
Item 5.4950
Item 6.4950
5051
5152


Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements include all statements that do not relate solely to historical or current facts, and can generally be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “believe,” “will,” “expect,” “project,” “estimate,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “continue” or similar expressions. In particular, information appearing under “Prosper Marketplace, Inc. Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements,” “Prosper Funding LLC Notes to Condensed Financial Statements” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” includes forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements inherently involve many risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in these statements. Where, in any forward-looking statement, Prosper Funding LLC (“Prosper Funding”) or Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI” and, collectively with Prosper Funding, the “Registrants”) expresses an expectation or belief as to future results or events, such expectation or belief is based on the current plans and expectations of Prosper Funding and PMI’s respective managements, expressed in good faith and is believed to have a reasonable basis.  Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that the expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. The following include some but not all of the factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated:

·the performance of the Borrower Payment Dependent Notes or “Notes”, which, in addition to being speculative investments, are special, limited obligations that are not secured, guaranteed or insured;

·Prosper Funding’s ability to make payments on the Notes, including in the event that borrowers fail to make payments on the corresponding loans;

·the reliability of the information about borrowers that is supplied by borrowers;

·Prosper Funding and PMI’s ability to service the loans, and their ability or the ability of a third party debt collector to pursue collection against any borrower, including in the event of fraud or identity theft;

·credit risks posed by the credit worthiness of borrowers, the lack of a maximum debt-to-income ratio for borrowers, and the effectiveness of the Registrants’ credit rating systems;

·actions by some borrowers to defraud lender members and risks associated with identity theft;

·Prosper Funding and PMI’s limited operational history and lack of significant historical performance data about borrower performance;

·the impact of current economic conditions on the performance of the Notes and loss rates of the Notes;

·payments by borrowers on the loans in light of the facts that the loans do not impose restrictions on borrowers and do not include cross-default provisions;

·Prosper Funding and PMI’s compliance with applicable local, state and federal law, including the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the Investment Company Act of 1940 and other laws;

·potential efforts by state regulators or litigants to characterize Prosper Funding or PMI, rather than WebBank, as the lender of the loans originated through the platform;

·the application of federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws to borrowers and to Prosper Funding and PMI;

·the impact of borrower delinquencies, defaults and prepayments on the returns on the Notes;

·the lack of a public trading market for the Notes and any inability to resell the Notes on the Note Trader platform;

·the federal income tax treatment of an investment in the Notes and the PMI Management Rights;
i

·Prosper Funding and PMI’s ability to prevent security breaches, disruptions in service, and comparable events that could compromise the personal and confidential information held on their data systems, reduce the attractiveness of the platform or adversely impact their ability to service loans;

·the resolution of any litigation involving PMI, including any state or federal securities litigation; and

·Prosper Funding’s ability to compete successfully in the peer-to-peer and consumer lending industry.

There may be other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.  Prosper Funding and PMI can give no assurances that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will occur or, if any of them does, what impact they will have on Prosper Funding or PMI’s results of operations and financial condition. You should carefully read the factors described in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of certain risks that could, among other things, cause Prosper Funding and PMI’s actual results to differ from these forward-looking statements.

All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Prosper Funding and PMI undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, other than as required by law.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION

The Registrants file annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the SEC. You can inspect, read and copy these reports and other information at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You can obtain information regarding the operation of the SEC’s Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that makes available reports, proxy statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically.
ii

PART I. Financial Information
Item 1.
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

 
 June 30,  December 31, 
 
 2013  2012 
Assets 
  
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents $10,515  $2,300 
Restricted Cash 7,288  5,949 
Short Term Investments -  1,000 
Receivables 132  92 
Loans Held for Investment at Fair Value 152  175 
Borrower Loans Receivable at Fair Value 187,125  166,900 
Property and Equipment, net 2,178  1,530 
Prepaid and Other Assets 1,227  376 
Total Assets $208,617  $178,322 
 
      
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity      
Accounts Payable $1,055  $1,787 
Accrued Liabilities 3,616  2,979 
Class Action Settlement Liability 10,000  - 
Notes at Fair Value 187,489  167,478 
Loan Loss Reserve 165  41 
Total Liabilities 202,325  172,285 
 
      
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 10)      
 
      
Stockholders' Equity      
Convertible preferred stock – Series A-F ($0.001 par value; zero and 71,958,130 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively) -  72 
Convertible preferred stock – Series A '13 ($0.001 par value; 138,681,680 and zero shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively) 139  - 
Convertible preferred stock – Series A-1 '13 ($0.001 par value; 51,171,951 and zero shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively) 51  - 
Common stock ($0.001 par value; 277,363,460 shares authorized; 65,708,365 issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2013; and 82,630,003 shares authorized; 3,006,745 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012) 68  5 
Additional Paid in Capital 103,076  83,150 
Less: Treasury Stock (291) (291)
Accumulated Deficit (96,751) (76,899)
Total Stockholders' Equity 6,292  6,037 
 
      
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $208,617  $178,322 

 
 
September 30,
2013
  
December 31,
2012
 
Assets 
  
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents $29,300  $2,300 
Restricted Cash  8,283   5,949 
Short Term Investments  -   1,000 
Accounts Receivable  214   92 
Loans Held for Investment at Fair Value  137   175 
Borrower Loans Receivable at Fair Value  204,131   166,900 
Property and Equipment, net  3,159   1,530 
Prepaid and Other Assets  681   376 
Total Assets $245,905  $178,322 
 
        
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity        
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities $4,345  $4,766 
Class Action Settlement Liability  10,000   - 
Notes at Fair Value  204,465   167,478 
Repurchase Liability for Unvested Restricted Stock Awards 646-
Loan Loss Reserve  61   41 
Total Liabilities  219,517   172,285 
 
        
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 10)        
 
        
Stockholders' Equity        
Convertible preferred stock – Series A-F, $0.01 par value; zero and 7,195,813 shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Aggregate liquidation preference of zero and $51,172 as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  -   72 
Convertible preferred stock – Series A '13, A-1 '13 and B '13, $0.01 par value; 27,274,068 and zero shares authorized, issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Aggregate liquidation preferences of $96,172 and zero as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.  273   - 
Common stock – $0.01 par value; 41,487,465 shares authorized; 13,799,063 issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2013; and 8,263,000 shares authorized; 300,674 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2012.  75   5 
Additional Paid - in Capital  128,045   83,150 
Less: Treasury Stock  (291)  (291)
Accumulated Deficit  (101,714)  (76,899)
Total Stockholders' Equity  26,388   6,037 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $245,905  $178,322 
The number of shares issued and outstanding reflects a 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected by the Company on October 29, 2013.
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
1

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)
 
 Three Months Ended September 30,  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
 
 2013  2012  2013  2012 
Revenues 
  
  
  
 
Origination Fees $4,409  $2,083  $9,323  $5,223 
Interest Income on Borrower Loans  9,039   5,027   25,348   15,437 
Interest Expense on Notes  (8,435)  (4,716)  (23,888)  (14,618)
Rebates and Promotions  (471)  (455)  (1,133)  (1,004)
Total Revenues  4,542   1,939   9,650   5,038 
 
                
Cost of Revenues                
Cost of Services  (508)  (375)  (1,490)  (1,056)
Reversal of (Provision for) Loan Losses  58   (5)  (119)  (17)
Net Revenues  4,092   1,559   8,041   3,965 
 
                
Expenses                
Compensation and Benefits  3,224   2,778   8,999   7,584 
Marketing and Advertising  4,676   1,578   10,126   3,980 
Depreciation and Amortization  228   167   643   493 
Professional Services  399   863   1,781   2,496 
Facilities and Maintenance  530   302   1,323   927 
Class Action Settlement  -   -   10,000   - 
Other  410   320   1,235   1,170 
Total Expenses  9,467   6,008   34,107   16,650 
Loss Before Other Income and Expenses  (5,375)  (4,449)  (26,066)  (12,685)
 
                
Other Income and Expenses                
Interest Income  1   1   1   6 
Change in Fair Value on Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Investment and Notes, net  91   316   578   836 
Loss on Impairment of Fixed Assets  -   -   (62)  - 
Other Income  320   145   734   235 
Total Other Income and Expenses  412   462   1,251   1,077 
 
                
Loss Before Income Taxes  (4,963)  (3,987)  (24,815)  (11,608)
Provision or Income Taxes  -   -   -   - 
Net Loss $(4,963) $(3,987) $(24,815) $(11,608)
 
                
Net loss per share – basic and diluted $(0.72) $(13.70) $(4.05) $(40.05)
Weighted – average shares - basic and diluted net loss per share  6,927,648   290,979   6,119,987   289,823 

 
 Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30, 
 
 2013  2012  2013  2012 
Revenues 
  
  
  
 
Origination Fees $3,342  $1,757  $4,914  $3,139 
Interest Income on Borrower Loans 8,578  5,780  16,309  10,410 
Interest Expense on Notes (8,128) (5,499) (15,453) (9,902)
Rebates and Promotions (387) (265) (662) (549)
Total Revenues 3,405  1,773  5,108  3,098 
 
            
Cost of Revenues            
Cost of Services (500) (345) (982) (681)
Provision for Loan Loss (50) (8) (177) (11)
Net Revenues 2,855  1,420  3,949  2,406 
 
            
Operating Expenses            
Compensation and Benefits 3,270  2,350  5,775  4,807 
Marketing and Advertising 3,878  1,127  5,451  2,401 
Depreciation and Amortization 208  168  413  326 
General and Administrative            
Professional Services 694  639  1,382  1,633 
Facilities and Maintenance 481  301  794  625 
Class Action Settlement 10,000  -  10,000  - 
Other 499  381  825  850 
Total Operating Expenses 19,030  4,966  24,640  10,642 
Loss Before Other Income and Expenses (16,175) (3,546) (20,691) (8,236)
 
            
Other Income and Expenses            
Interest Income -  5  -  4 
Change in fair value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Investment and Notes, net 312  241  487  520 
Loss on Impairment of Fixed Assets (61) -  (62) - 
Other Income 271  43  414  91 
Total Other Income and Expenses 522  289  839  615 
 
            
Loss Before Income Taxes (15,653) (3,257) (19,852) (7,621)
Provision For Income Taxes -  -  -  - 
Net Loss $(15,653) $(3,257) $(19,852) $(7,621)
 
            
Net loss per share – basic and diluted $(0.24) $(1.12) $(0.33) $(2.63)
Weighted average shares - basic and diluted net loss per share 65,537,851  2,897,859  60,202,814  2,892,749 
The weighted average number of shares and the net loss per share reflect a 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected by the Company on October 29, 2013.
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
2

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)
 
 Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Treasury Stock  
  
  
 
 
 Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  
Additional
Paid In
Capital
  
Accumulated
Deficit
  Total 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
Balance as of January 1, 2013  7,195,813  $72   482,938  $5   (182,264) $(291) $83,150  $(76,899) $6,037 
Issuance of convertible preferred stock, Series A'13, net of issuance costs  13,868,152   139   -   -   -   -   19,705   -   19,844 
Issuance of convertible preferred stock, Series A-1'13  5,117,182   51   -   -   -   -   -   -   51 
Issuance of convertible preferred stock, Series B'13, net of issuance costs  8,288,734   83   -   -   -   -   24,797   -   24,880 
Conversion of Preferred Series A-F  (7,195,813)  (72)  6,191,270   62   -   -   10   -   - 
Exercise of vested stock options  -   -   824,502   8   -   -   199   -   207 
Exercise of nonvested  stock options  -   -   6,499,459   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Repurchase of restricted stock  -   -   (37,662)  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Exercise of common stock warrants  -   -   820   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Compensation expense  -   -   -   -   -   -   184   -   184 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (24,815)  (24,815)
Balance as of September 30, 2013  27,274,068  $273   13,961,327  $75   (182,264) $(291) $128,045  $(101,714) $26,388 

 
 Preferred Stock  Common Stock  Treasury Stock  
  
  
 
 
 Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  
Additional
Paid-In Capital
  
Accumulated
Deficit
  Total 
 
 
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
  
 
 
Balance as of January 1, 2013  71,958,130   $72   4,829,385   $5   (1,822,640)  $(291)  $83,150   $(76,899)  $6,037 
Issuance of convertible preferred stock, Series A'13  138,681,680   $139   -   -   -   -   19,810   -   19,949 
Issuance cost of convertible preferred stock, Series A'13                          (101)      (101)
Issuance of convertible preferred stock, Series A-1'13  51,171,951   51   -   -   -   -   -   -   51 
Conversion of Preferred Series A-F  (71,958,130)  (72)  61,912,702   62   -   -   10   -   - 
Exercise of stock options  -   -   780,718   1   -   -   115   -   116 
Exercise of common stock warrants  -   -   8,200   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Compensation expense  -   -   -   -   -   -   92   -   92 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (19,852)  (19,852)
Balance as of June 30, 2013  189,853,631   $190   67,531,005   $68   (1,822,640)  $(291)  $103,076   $(96,751)  $6,292 
The number of shares reflects a 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected by the Company on October 29, 2013.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
3

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

 For the Six Months Ended June 30, 
 
 2013  2012 
Cash flows from operating activities:    
Net loss  $(19,852)  $(7,621)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:        
Change in fair value of Borrower Loans  4,082   (1,060)
Change in fair value of Notes  (4,573)  532 
Depreciation and amortization  413   326 
Loan loss Reserve  124   7 
Stock-based compensation expense  92   163 
Loss on impairment of fixed assets  62    
Change in fair value of Loans held for investment  3   8 
Issuance of common stock warrants     23 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Class action settlement liability  10,000    
Restricted cash  (1,339)  (830)
Receivables  (40)  (58)
Prepaid and other assets  (851)  (145)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  (95)  300 
Net cash used in operating activities  (11,974)  (8,355)
 
        
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Origination of Borrower Loans held at fair value  (74,875)  (71,074)
Repayment of Borrower Loans held at fair value  50,568   27,990 
Purchases of property and equipment  (1,123)  (262)
Maturities of short term investments  1,000   5,999 
Repayment of Loans held for investment at fair value  64   62 
Origination of Loans held for investment at fair value  (44)  (158)
Purchases of short term investments     (3,000)
Net cash used in investing activities  (24,410)  (40,443)
 
        
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from issuance of Notes held at fair value  74,875   71,074 
Payment of Notes held at fair value  (50,291)  (27,351)
Proceeds from issuance of convertible preferred stock  20,000    
Principal repayment of notes payable  116    
Issuance costs of convertible preferred stock  (101)   
Proceeds from issuance of common stock     3 
Net cash provided by financing activities  44,599   43,726 
 
        
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  8,215   (5,072)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period  2,300   9,216 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period  $10,515   $4,144 
 
 For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 
 
 2013  2012 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities: 
  
 
Net loss $(24,815) $(11,608)
Adjustments to Reconcile net loss to net cash used in Operating Activities:     
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans  3,903   (2,913)
Change in Fair Value of Notes  (4,484)  2,063 
Depreciation and Amortization  643   493 
Change in Loan loss Reserve  20   13 
Stock-based Compensation Expense  184   262 
Loss on Impairment of Fixed Assets  62    
Change in Fair Value of Loans Held for Investment  3   14 
Issuance of Common Stock Warrants     53 
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:        
Class action Settlement Liability  10,000    
Restricted Cash  (2,334)  (1,000)
Receivables  (122)  (64)
Prepaid and Other Assets  (305)  (188)
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities  (421)  1,215 
Net Cash used in Operating Activities  (17,666)  (11,660)
 
        
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Origination of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value  (118,349)  (116,148)
Repayment of Borrower Loans Held at Fair Value  77,215   46,277 
Purchases of Property and Equipment  (2,334)  (553)
Maturities of Short term Investments  1,000   8,998 
Repayment of Loans Held for Investment at Fair Value  106   94 
Origination of Loans Held for Investment at Fair Value  (71)  (164)
Purchases of Short – term Investments     (3,000)
Net Cash used in Investing Activities  (42,433)  (64,496)
 
        
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:        
Proceeds from Issuance of Notes Held at Fair Value  118,349   116,148 
Payment of Notes Held at Fair Value  (76,878)  (45,193)
Proceeds from Issuance of Convertible Preferred Stock  45,000    
Proceeds from Early Exercise of Stock Options650
Proceeds from Exercise of Vested Stock Options20719
Repurchase of restricted stock  (4   
Issuance Costs of Convertible Preferred Stock  (225)   
Net Cash provided by Financing Activities  87,099   70,974 
 
        
Net Increase (decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents  27,000   (5,182)
Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of the period  2,300   9,216 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of the period $29,300  $4,034 
 
        
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:        
Cash Paid for Interest $23,844  $14,151 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
4

Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

1.
1.Organization and Business

Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware on March 22, 2005. PMI developed and operated a peer-to-peer online credit platform (the “platform”) that permitted its borrower members to apply for loans and lender members to purchase notes (“Notes”) issued by PMI, the proceeds of which facilitated the funding of specific loans to borrowers. On February 1, 2013, PMI transferred ownership of the platform, including all of the rights related to the operation of the platform, to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Prosper Funding LLC (“Prosper Funding” and, collectively with PMI (“PMI Group”). Since February 1, 2013, all Notes issued and sold through the platform are issued and sold by Prosper Funding.  Pursuant to athe Loan Account Program Agreement between PMI and WebBank, dated as of September 14, 2010, PMI manages the operation of the platform, as agent of WebBank, in connection with the submission of loan applications by potential borrowers, the making of related loans by WebBank and the funding of such loans by WebBank. Pursuant toOn February 1, 2013, Prosper Funding LLC entered into an Administration Agreement betweenwith PMI in its capacity as licensee, corporate administrator, loan platform administrator and loan and note servicer in which PMI provides certain back office support, loan platform administration and loan and note servicing to Prosper Funding and PMI, PMI manages all other aspects of the platform on behalf of Prosper Funding.

The platform enables borrower members to request and obtain personal, unsecured loans by posting anonymous “listings” on the platform. Loan terms are subject to minimum and maximum loan amounts determined by the borrower’s credit bureau score and Prosper score, at interest rates set by PMI. PMI sets the interest rates for borrower loans based on Prosper Ratings, as well as additional factors, such as estimated loss rate, loan terms, general economic environment, previous Prosper loans and competitive conditions. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, borrowers could create loan listings from $2 up to $35.

All loans requested and obtained through the platform are unsecured obligations of individual borrower members with a fixed interest rate and loan terms set at three or five years as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013. All loans made through the platform are funded by WebBank, an FDIC-insured, Utah chartered industrial bank. After funding a loan, WebBank sells the loan to PMI (prior to February 1, 2013) or Prosper Funding (on or after February 1, 2013), without recourse to WebBank, in exchange for the principal amount of the loan (the “Borrower Loans”). WebBank does not have any obligation to purchasers of the Notes.

As reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, net losses and negative cash flows were incurred from operations since inception.  An accumulated deficit of approximately $96,751$101,714 was incurred as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013.  At JuneSeptember 30, 2013, approximately $10,515$29,300 in cash and cash equivalents was on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.being held. Since its inception, operations have been financed primarily through equity financing from various sources and is dependent upon raising additional capital or debt financing to fund its current operating plan.  Failure to obtain sufficient debt and equity financings and, ultimately, to achieve profitable operations and positive cash flows from operations could adversely affect the ability to achieve its business objectives and continue as a going concern.  Further, there can be no assurances as to the availability or terms upon which the required financing and capital might be available.  On January 15, 2013, PMI entered into aThe Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement with certain new investors and certain of its existing investors (each, a “Share“Series A Share Purchaser” and, collectively, the “Share“Series A Share Purchasers”), pursuant to which PMI issued and sold to such Series A Share Purchasers, (eithereither directly or through certain of their respective affiliates) 138,681,680affiliates, 13,868,152 shares of PMI’s Series A preferred stock and 5,117,182 of Series A-1 preferred stock for an aggregate purchase price of $20,000.$19,844, net of issuance costs.  On September 23, 2013, PMI entered into The Series B Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement with certain new investors and certain of its existing investors (each, a “Series B Share Purchaser” and, collectively, the “Series B Share Purchasers”), pursuant to which PMI issued and sold to such Series B Share Purchasers, either directly or through certain of their respective affiliates, 8,288,734 shares of PMI’s Series B preferred stock for an aggregate purchase price of $24,880, net of issuance costs.  See Note 7, Stockholders’ Equity, for additional information.

2.
2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) and disclosure requirements for interim financial information and the requirements of Rule 10-018-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012. The balance sheet at December 31, 2012 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date. Management believes these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, including those of a normal recurring nature, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year of any other interim period.
5

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PMI and its wholly-owned subsidiary Prosper Funding. All intercompany balances and transactions between Prosper Funding and PMI have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates, judgments and assumptions include but are not limited to the following: valuation of borrower loans receivable and associated member payment dependent notes, valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, valuation and amortization periods of intangible assets, provision for loan losses, stock-based compensation expense, and contingent liabilities. Estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain Risks and Concentrations

In the normal course of its business, two significant types of risk are encountered: credit and regulatory. Financial instruments that potentially subject significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and short term investments. Cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and short term investments are placed with high-quality financial institutions and is exposed to credit risk in the event of default by these institutions to the extent the amount recorded on the balance sheet exceeds federally insured amounts. Periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions are performed and no credit losses have been sustained from instruments held at these financial institutions.

To the extent that loan payments are not made, servicing income will be reduced.  Borrower Loans are funded by the Notes and repayment of said Notes is wholly dependent on the repayment of the Borrower Loans associated with the Notes.  As a result, PMI Group does not bear the risk associated with the repayment of principal on loans carried on its condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The PMI Group is subject to various regulatory requirements. The failure to appropriately identify and address these regulatory requirements could result in certain discretionary actions by regulators that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial position and results of operations (See Note 10—Commitments and Contingencies—Securities Law Compliance).

Cash and Cash Equivalents

All highly liquid investments with stated maturities of three months or less from date of purchase are classified as cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Such deposits periodically exceed amounts insured by the FDIC.  Cash and cash equivalents include various unrestricted deposits with highly rated financial institutions in checking, money market and short-term certificate of deposit accounts.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists primarily of cash deposits held as collateral as required to support operatingfor loan funding and servicing activities.

Short Term Investments

Short term investments consist of highly liquid instruments with original maturity periods greater than three months and less than 12 months.

6

Borrower Loans and Notes

Prior to February 1, 2013, PMI Group issues Notes and purchases Borrower Loans from WebBank, and holds the Borrower Loans until maturity.  The obligation to repay the Notes is conditioned upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loans.  Borrower Loans and Notes are carried on PMI Group's condensed consolidated balance sheets as assets and liabilities, respectively.  PMI Group has adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments.  ASC Topic 825 permits companies to choose to measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected reported in earnings.  The fair value election, with respect to an item, may not be revoked once an election is made.  In applying the provisions of ASC Topic 825, the recorded assets and liabilities are measured using the fair value option in a way that separates these reported fair values from the carrying values of similar assets and liabilities measured with a different measurement attribute.  A specific allowance account is not recorded relating to the Borrower Loans and Notes in which it has elected the fair value option, but rather estimates the fair value of such Borrower Loans and Notes using discounted cash flow methodologies adjusted for the historical payment, loss and recovery rates. An account is considered to be a loss, or charged-off, when it reaches more than 120 days past due.  The aggregate fair value of the Borrower Loans and Notes are reported as separate line items in the assets and liabilities sections of the accompanying balance sheets using the methods described in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures—See Fair Value Measurement.
6


Fair Value Measurement

PMI Group adopted ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, on January 1, 2008, which provides a framework for measuring the fair value of assets and liabilities. ASC Topic 820 also provides guidance regarding a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes information used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings and provides for enhanced disclosures determined by the level within the hierarchy of information used in the valuation. ASC Topic 820 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances.

ASC Topic 820 defines fair value in terms of the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

The price used to measure the fair value is not adjusted for transaction costs while the cost basis of certain financial instruments may include initial transaction costs. Under ASC Topic 820, the fair value measurement also assumes that the transaction to sell an asset occurs in the principal market for the asset or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset. The principal market is the market in which the reporting entity would sell or transfer the asset with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset. In determining the principal market for an asset or liability under ASC Topic 820, it is assumed that the reporting entity has access to the market as of the measurement date. If no market for the asset exists or if the reporting entity does not have access to the principal market, the reporting entity should use a hypothetical market.

Under ASC Topic 820, assets and liabilities carried at fair value in the balance sheets are classified among three levels based on the observability of the inputs used to determine fair value:

Level 1 — The valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments.

Level 2 — The valuation is based on observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

Level 3 — The valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the instrument. Level 3 valuations are typically performed using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, which incorporate management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation.

Fair value of financial instruments are determined based on the fair value hierarchy established in ASC Topic 820, which requires an entity to maximize the use of quoted prices and observable inputs and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Various valuation techniques are utilized, depending on the nature of the financial instrument, including the use of market prices for identical or similar instruments, or discounted cash flow models. When possible, active and observable market data for identical or similar financial instruments are utilized. Alternatively, fair value is determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short term investments, Borrower Loans receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, Notes and long-term debt.  The estimated fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying values because of their short term nature.

Borrower Loans and Notes are accounted for on a fair value basis.

7

The following tables present the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:
September 30, 2013
 Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs  Fair Value 
Assets        
Borrower Loans Receivable $-  $-  $204,131  $204,131 
Certificates of Deposit  -   1,438   -   1,438 
Loans Held for Investment  -   -   137   137 
Liabilities  -   -   -   - 
Notes  -   -   204,465   204,465 
December 31, 2012
 Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs  Fair Value 
Assets        
Short – Term Investments $1,000  $-  $-  $1,000 
Certificates of Deposit  -   1,618   -   1,618 
Borrower Loans Receivable  -   -   166,900   166,900 
Borrower Loans Held for Investment  -   -   175   175 
Liabilities                
Notes  -   -   167,478   167,478 
Short term investments consist of United States Treasuries with original maturity periods greater than three months and less than 12 months. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that PMI Group has the ability to access. PMI Group classifies United States Treasuries as Level 1 assets which it intends to hold until maturity.
Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consists of computer equipment, office furniture and equipment, and software purchased or developed for internal use. Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization, and are computed using the straight-line method based upon estimated useful lives of the assets, which range from three to seven years, commencing once the asset is placed in service. Expenditures are capitalized for replacements and betterments and recognized as expense amounts for maintenance and repairs as incurred.

7Earned Vacations


TableThe Company has a flexible vacation plan for its employees under which employees are entitled to take vacations for such periods of Contentstime that do not interfere with the orderly performance of their job responsibilities. Accordingly, no accrual for unpaid vacation pay has been included in the financial statements.

Internal Use Software and Website Development

Internal use software costs and website development costs are accounted for, in accordance with ASC Topic 350-40, Internal Use Software, and ASC Topic 350-50, Website Development Costs. In accordance with ASC Topic 350-40 and 350-50, the costs to develop software for the website and other internal uses are capitalized when management has authorized and committed project funding, preliminary development efforts are successfully completed, and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used as intended. Capitalized software development costs primarily include software licenses acquired, fees paid to outside consultants, and salaries and payroll related costs for employees directly involved in the development efforts.

Costs incurred prior to meeting these criteria, together with costs incurred for training and maintenance, are expensed. Costs incurred for upgrades and enhancements that are considered to be probable to result in additional functionality are capitalized. Capitalized costs are included in property and equipment and amortized to expense using the straight-line method over their expected lives. Software assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable.  Recoverability of software assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset.  If such software assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the software asset.

Loan Loss Reserve

PMI Group is obligated to indemnify lenders and or repurchase certain Notes sold to the lenders in the event of violation of applicable federal, state, or local lending laws or verifiable identify theft. The loan loss reserve is estimated based on historical experience and is accrued when the Notes are issued. Indemnified or repurchased Notes are written off at the time of repurchase or at the time an indemnification payment is made.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. Under ASC Topic 605, revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the price of the services is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

Origination Fees

Borrowers pay an origination fee upon the successful closing of a loan. The origination fee is deducted and retained from the loan amount prior to disbursing the net amount to the borrower member. The loan origination fee is determined by the term and credit grade of the loan, and ranges from 1.00% to 4.95% of the original principal amount.  Origination fees are not deferred but are recognized at origination of the loan, and direct costs to originate loans are recorded as expenses as incurred since Borrower Loans, Borrower Loans held for investment and Notes are accounted for at fair value.

Loan Servicing Fees

Loan servicing fees are accrued daily based on the current outstanding loan principal balance of the Borrower Loans but are not recognized until payment is received due to the uncertainty of collection of borrower loan payments.

8

Interest Income on Borrower Loans Receivable and Interest Expense on Notes

Interest income on Borrower Loans is recognized using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent that is believed it to be collectable.  Interest expense is recorded on the corresponding Notes based on the contractual interest rate.  Below is a table that summarizes the gross interest income and expense for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012.

 Three months ended June 30,  Six months ended June 30, 
 2013  2012  2013  2012  
Three months ended
September 30,
  
Nine months ended
September 30,
 
         2013  2012  2013  2012 
Interest Income on Borrower Loans  $8,578   $5,780   $16,309   $10,410  $9,039  $5,027  $25,348  $15,437 
Interest Expense on Notes  (8,128)  (5,499)  (15,453)  (9,902)  (8,435)  (4,716)  (23,888)  (14,618)
Net Interest Income  $450   $281   $856   $508  $604  $311  $1,460  $819 
8


Marketing and Advertising Expense

Under the provisions of ASC Topic 720, Other Expenses, the costs of advertising are expensed as incurred. AdvertisingMarketing and advertising costs were approximately $3,878$4,676 and $1,127$1,578 for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. AdvertisingMarketing and advertising costs were approximately $5,451$10,126 and $2,401$3,980 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Rebate and Promotional Expenses

Rebates and promotions are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition.  From time to time rebates and promotions are offered to borrower and lender members.  These rebates and promotions are recorded as an offset to revenue if a particular rebate or promotion is earned upon the origination of the loan. Rebates and promotions have in the past been in the form of cash back and other incentives paid to lenders and borrowers.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation for employees is accounted for using fair-value-based accounting in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Stock Compensation.  ASC Topic 718 requires companies to estimate the fair value of stock-based awards on the date of grant using an option-pricing model. The stock-based compensation related to awards that are expected to vest is amortized using the straight line method over the vesting term of the stock-based award, which is generally four years. Expected forfeitures of unvested options are estimated at the time of grant such that expense is recorded only for those stock-based awards that are expected to vest.

Options have been granted to purchase shares of common stock to nonemployees in exchange for services performed which it accounts for in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 505-50, Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. Because ASC Topic 505 requires that nonemployee equity awards be recorded at their fair value, the Black-Scholes model is used to estimate the fair value of options granted to nonemployees at each vesting date until performance is complete to determine the appropriate charge for the services provided. The volatility of the common stock was based on comparative company volatility.

Net Loss Per Share

Net loss per share is computed in accordance with ASC Topic 260, Earnings Per Share. Under ASC Topic 260, basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss per share available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period and excludes the effects of any potentially dilutive securities. Diluted earnings per share, if presented, would include the dilution that would occur upon the exercise or conversion of all potentially dilutive securities into common stock using the “treasury stock” and/or “if converted” methods as applicable. At JuneSeptember 30, 2013, there were outstanding convertible preferred stock, warrants and options convertible into 138,681,720,  2,187,96922,156,922,  218,797 and 7,212,610979,483 common shares, respectively, which may dilute future earnings per share. At September 30, 2012, there were outstanding convertible preferred stock, warrants and options convertible into 7,195,770, 260,971 and 1,291,420 common shares, respectively, which may dilute future earnings per share. The weighted average number of shares and the loss per share reflect a 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected by the Company on October 29, 2013. By reporting a net loss for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the computation of net loss per share, as their effect would be antidilutive.

Income Taxes

The asset and liability method is used to account for income taxes as codified in ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

9

Under ASC Topic 740, the policy to include interest and penalties related to gross unrecognized tax benefits within its provision for income taxes did not change.  U.S. Federal, California and other state income tax returns are filed.  PMI Group are currently not undergoing to any income tax examinations. Due to the net operating loss, generally all tax years remain open.

Comprehensive Income

There is no comprehensive income (loss) other than the net income (loss) disclosed in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There have been no recentWe do not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or changes in accounting pronouncements during the six months ended June 30, 2013 that are of significance, or potential significance.cash flows.

9

3.Borrower Loans and Notes Held at Fair Value
3. Borrower Loans and Notes Held at Fair Value

The following tables present the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012:

December 31, 2012 Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs  Fair Value 
Assets        
Short term investments  $1,000   $-   $-   $1,000 
Borrower Loans receivable  -   -   166,900   166,900 
Borrower Loans held for investment  -   -   175   175 
Liabilities                
Notes  $-   $-   $167,478   $167,478 
June 30, 2013 Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs  Fair Value 
Assets                
Borrower Loans receivable  $-   $-   $187,125   $187,125 
Loans held for investment  -   -   152   152 
Liabilities                
Notes  $-   $-   $187,489   $187,489 

September 30, 2013 Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs  Fair Value 
Assets        
Borrower Loans Receivable $-  $-  $204,131  $204,131 
Loans Held for Investment  -   -   137   137 
Liabilities  -   -   -   - 
Notes  -   -   204,465   204,465 
December 31, 2012 Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs  Fair Value 
Assets        
Short – Term Investments $1,000  $-  $-  $1,000 
Borrower Loans Receivable  -   -   166,900   166,900 
Borrower Loans Held for Investment  -   -   175   175 
Liabilities                
Notes  -   -   167,478   167,478 
Short term investments consist of United States Treasuries with maturity periods greater than three months and less than 12 months.  In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that PMI Group has the ability to access. PMI Group classifies United States Treasuries as Level 1 assets which it intends to hold until maturity.

As observable market prices are not available for the Borrower Loans and Notes the PMI Group holds, or for similar assets and liabilities, the PMI Group believes the Borrower Loans and Notes should be considered Level 3 financial instruments under ASC Topic 820.  In a hypothetical transaction as of the measurement date, PMI Group believes that differences in the principal marketplace in which the loans are originated and the principal marketplace in which it might offer those loans may result in differences between the originated amount of the loans and their fair value as of the transaction date.  For Borrower Loans, the fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon valuation assumptions including prepayment speeds, roll rates, recovery rates and discount rates based on the perceived credit risk within each credit grade.

The obligation to pay principal and interest on any Note is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of its servicing fee.  The fair value election for Notes and Borrower Loans allows both the assets and the related liabilities to receive similar accounting treatment for expected losses which is consistent with the subsequent cash flows to lenders that are dependent upon borrower payments.  As such, the fair value of the Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the Borrower Loans, adjusted for the servicing fee and the timing of borrower payments subsequently disbursed to Note holders.  Any unrealized gains or losses on the Borrower Loans and Notes for which the fair value option has been elected is recorded as a separate line item in the statement of operations.  The effective interest rate associated with the Notes is less than the interest rate earned on the Borrower Loans due to the servicing fee.  See further in this note for a roll-forward and further discussion of the significant assumptions used to value Borrower Loans and Notes.

10

The fair value of the Notes and Borrower Loans are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The main assumptions used to value the Borrower Loans and Notes include prepayment rates derived from historical prepayment rates for each credit score, default rates derived from historical performance, recovery rates and discount rates applied to each credit tranche based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade. The obligation to pay principal and interest on any Note is equal to the loan payments, if any, received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of the servicing fee.  As such, the fair value of the Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the Borrower Loans, adjusted for the servicing fee and the timing of borrower payments subsequently disbursed to the Note holders.  The effective interest rate associated with the Notes will be less than the interest rate earned on the Borrower Loans due to the servicing fee.

10

For Borrower Loans originated and Notes, the following average assumptions to determine the fair value as of June 30, 2013 were used:September 30:

Monthly prepayment rate speed1.53%
Recovery rate2.60%
Discount rate *10.50%
 
2013
 
2012
Monthly prepayment rate speed1.50%
 
1.60%
Recovery rate2.50%
 
5.39%
Discount rate *10.00%
 
9.97%

*
This is the average discount rate among all of the credit grades

Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions at September 30, 2013 for Borrower Loans and Notes are presented in the following table:

 
 Borrower Loans  Notes 
Discount rate assumption:  10.00%  10.00%
Resulting fair value from:        
100 basis point increase $202,015  $199,663 
200 basis point increase  199,623   197,271 
Resulting fair value from:        
100 basis point decrease $206,953  $204,550 
200 basis point decrease  209,509   207,074 
 
        
 
        
Default rate assumption:        
Resulting fair value from:        
10% higher default rates $202,295  $199,926 
20% higher default rates  199,450   197,127 
Resulting fair value from:        
10% lower default rates $206,651  $204,234 
20% lower default rates  208,796   206,364 

The changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
 Borrower Loans  Notes  Loans Held for Investment  Total  Borrower Loans  Notes  
Loans Held for
Investment
  Total 
Balance at January 1, 2012  $75,763   $(76,160)  $137   $(260) $75,763  $(76,160) $137  $(260)
Originations  153,175   (153,175)  182   182   153,175  (153,175) 182  182 
Principal repayments and credit losses  (66,840)  65,690   (133)  (1,283)  (66,840) 65,690  (133) (1,283)
Change in fair value on Borrower Loans and Notes  4,802   (3,833)  -   969   4,802  (3,833) -  969 
Change in fair value of loans held for investment  -   -   (11)  (11)  -  -  (11) (11)
Balance at December 31, 2012  $166,900   $(167,478)  $175   $(403) $166,900  $(167,478) $175  $(403)
Originations  74,875   (74,875)  44   44   118,349  (118,349) 71  71 
Principal repayments and credit losses  (50,568)  50,291   (64)  (341)  (77,215) 76,878  (106) (443)
Change in fair value on Borrower Loans and Notes  (4,082)  4,573   -   491   (3,903) 4,484  -  581 
Change in fair value of loans held for investment  -   -   (3)  (3)  -  -  (3) (3)
Balance at June 30, 2013  $187,125   $(187,489)  $152   $(212)
Balance at September 30, 2013 $204,131  $(204,465) $137  $(197)
 
Due to the recent origination of the Borrower Loans and Notes, the change in fair value attributable to instrument-specific credit risk is immaterial.  There were no outstanding Borrower Loans or Notes originated or issued prior to July 13, 2009.  Of the Borrower Loans originated from July 13, 2009 to JuneSeptember 30, 2013, 255285 loans, which were 90 days or more delinquent, totaled an aggregate principal amount of $1,349$1,489 and a fair value of $122$144 as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013.  From July 13, 2009 to September 30, 2012, 214 loans, which were 90 days or more delinquent, totaled an aggregate principal amount of $1,061 and a fair value of $165.


11

No other assets or other liabilities were carried at fair value as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

4.
4.Loans Held for Investment at Fair Value

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, a total of $152$137 of Borrower Loans originated through the platform is presented as Loans Held for Investment in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. When a borrower member loan has been funded in whole, or in part, the portion of the borrower’s monthly loan payment that corresponds to the percentage of the loan that is funded is retained. In these cases, interest income is recorded on these Borrower Loans.

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Loans Held for Investment
Balance at January 1, 2012$137
Originations182
Principal repayments(133)
Change in fair value of loans held for investment(11)
Balance at December 31, 2012$175
Originations44
Principal repayments and credit losses(64)
Change in fair value of loans held for investment(3)
Balance at June 30, 2013$152

Origination fees earned from Borrower Loans funded are initially deferred and subsequently amortized ratably over the term of the Borrower Loan and are reported in the statement of operations as Origination fees.
11


The fair value of the Borrower Loans held for investment is estimated using the discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions similar to those of all the Borrower Loans, which are set forth in Note 3, as they have similar characteristics and the PMI Group expects these Borrower Loans to behave in a comparable manner.  The valuation assumptions used to value these Borrower Loans include prepayment rates, default rates and recovery rates derived from historical loan performance data and discount rates based on credit grade applied to each Borrower Loan.

The fair value adjustment on these Borrower Loans held for investment was zero and $3, which is included in earnings for the sixthree and nine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.  As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, $184$225 in payments was received on these Borrower Loans.  As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, there was $36$37 in Borrower Loans held for investment that were charged-off.

5.
5.Loan Loss Reserve

Changes inFor the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the reversal of (provision for) loan losses was $58 and ($119), respectively.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the provision for loan losses was ($5) and ($17), respectively.  The balance of the loan loss reserve are summarized below:as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, was $61 and $41, respectively.

Balance at January 1, 2013:6.$41
Provision for loan loss124
Balance at June 30, 2013:$165Net Loss Per Share

6. Net Loss Per Share

Net loss per share is computed in accordance with ASC Topic 260. Under ASC Topic 260, basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss per share available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period and excludes the effects of any potentially dilutive securities. Diluted earnings per share, if presented, would include the dilution that would occur upon the exercise or conversion of all potentially dilutive securities into common stock using the “treasury stock” and/or “if converted” methods as applicable. The weighted average number of shares and the loss per share reflect a 10-for-1 reverse stock split effected by the Company on October29, 2013.
The Company uses the two-class method to compute net loss per share because the Company has issued securities, other than common stock, that contractually entitle the holders to participate in dividends and earnings of the Company. The two-class method requires earnings for the period to be allocated between common stock and participating securities based upon their respective rights to receive distributed and undistributed earnings. Prior to their conversion to common shares, each series of the Company’s Preferred Stock was entitled to participate on an as-if-converted basis in distributions, when and if declared by the board of directors, that were made to common stockholders and as a result these shares were considered participating securities. During the nine months ended September 2013, certain shares issued as a result of the early exercise of stock options, which are subject to repurchase by the Company, were entitled to receive non-forfeitable dividends during the vesting period and as a result were considered participating securities.

BasicUnder the two-class method, for periods with net income, basic net income per common share is computed by dividing the net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Net income attributable to common stockholders is computed by subtracting from net income the portion of current year earnings that the participating securities would have been entitled to receive pursuant to their dividend rights had all of the year’s earnings been distributed. No such adjustment to earnings is made during periods with a net loss, as the holders of the participating securities have no obligation to fund losses. Diluted net loss per common share is computed under the two-class method by using the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding, plus, for periods with net income attributable to common stockholders, the potential dilutive effects of stock options and warrants. In addition, the Company analyzes the potential dilutive effect of the outstanding participating securities under the “if-converted” method when calculating diluted earnings per share, in which it is assumed that the outstanding participating securities convert into common stock at the beginning of the period. The Company reports the more dilutive of the approaches (two class or “if-converted”) as its diluted net income per share during the period. Due to net losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, basic and diluted loss per share was calculatedwere the same, as follows:the effect of potentially dilutive securities would have been anti-dilutive.

 
 Three months ended June 30,  Six months ended June 30, 
 
 2013  2012  2013  2012 
Numerator: 
  
  
  
 
Net loss  $(15,653)  $(3,257)  $(19,852)  $(7,621)
Denominator:                
Weighted average shares used in computing basic and diluted net loss per share  65,537,851   2,897,859   60,202,814   2,892,749 
Basic and diluted net loss per share  $(0.24)  $(1.12)  $(0.33)  $(2.63)
12


Due to losses attributable to common shareholders for each of the periods below, the following potentially dilutive shares are excluded from the diluted net loss per share calculation because they were anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method, in accordance with ASC Topic 260:

 
 
Three and six months ended
June 30,
 
 
 2013  2012 
Excluded Securities: (shares)  (shares) 
Convertible preferred stock issued and outstanding  138,681,720   61,958,136 
Stock options issued and outstanding  7,212,610   12,406,772 
Warrants  issued and outstanding  2,187,969   2,380,298 
Total common stock equivalents excluded from diluted net loss per common share computation  148,082,299   76,745,206 
  Nine Months ended September 30, 
  2013  2012 
Excluded Securities: (shares)  (shares) 
Convertible preferred stock issued and outstanding  22,156,922   7,195,770 
Stock options issued and outstanding  979,483   1,291,420 
Unvested stock options exercised  6,461,797   - 
Warrants  issued and outstanding  218,797   260,971 
Total common stock equivalents excluded from diluted net loss per common share computation  29,816,999   8,748,161 
12


shares issued and outstanding reflect a 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected by the Company on October 29, 2013.
7.
7.Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

Under PMI's certificate of incorporation, preferred stock is issuable in series, and PMI’s board of directors (the “Board of Directors”) is authorized to determine the rights, preferences, and terms of each series.

In January 2013, PMI issued and sold 138,681,68013,868,152 shares of new Series A (“Series A”) preferred stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.144$1.44 per share for approximately $20,000.$19,844, net of issuance costs.  In connection with that sale, PMI issued 51,171,9515,117,182 shares at par value $0.001$0.01 per share of Series A-1 (“Series A-1”) convertible preferred stock to certain previous holders of PMI’s original Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E and Series F preferred stock who participated in the sale. Upon issuance of the new Series A and Series A-1 preferred stock, all of PMI’s preferred stock existing prior to such issuance was converted into PMI common stock at a 1:1 ratio if the holder of the preferred stock participated in the new Series A preferred stock sale or at a 10:1 ratio if the holder of the preferred stock did not so participate.  These securities were sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering.  In September 2013, PMI issued and sold 8,288,734 shares of new Series B (“Series B”) preferred stock in a private placement at a purchase price of $3.02 per share for approximately $24,880, net of issuance costs.

Convertible
Preferred Stock
 Par Value  Authorized, Issued and Outstanding shares as of June 30, 2013  Balance June 30, 2013  Authorized, Issued and Outstanding shares as of December 31, 2012 
 Series A  $0.001   -   $-   4,023,999 
 Series B  0.001   -   -   3,310,382 
 Series C  0.001   -   -   2,063,558 
 Series D  0.001   -   -   20,340,705 
 Series E  0.001   -   -   23,222,747 
 Series E-1  0.001   -   -   10,000,000 
 Series F  0.001   -   -   8,996,739 
       -   $-   71,958,130 
Convertible
Preferred Stock
 Par Value  
Authorized, Issued and
Outstanding shares as of
September 30, 2013
  
Balance September
30, 2013
  Liquidation Preference 
Series A '13 $0.01   13,868,152   139  $20,000 
Series A-1 '13  0.01   5,117,182   51   51,172 
Series B '13  0.01   8,288,734   83   25,000 
 27,274,068$273$96,172

AsThe number of December 31, 2012,shares issued and outstanding reflect a 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected by the total balanceCompany on October 29, 2013.
13

Convertible
Preferred Stock
 Par Value  
Authorized, Issued and
Outstanding shares as of
September 30, 2013
  
Balance September
30, 2013
  
Authorized, Issued and
Outstanding shares as of
December 31, 2012
  
Balance December
31, 2012
 
Series A $0.01   -  $-   402,400     
Series B  0.01   -   -   331,038     
Series C  0.01   -   -   206,356     
Series D  0.01   -   -   2,034,070     
Series E  0.01   -   -   2,322,275     
Series E-1  0.01   -   -   1,000,000     
Series F  0.01   -   -   899,674     
 
      -  $-   7,195,813  $72 
Dividends

Dividends on shares of the new Series A and Series B preferred stock are payable only when, as, and if declared by the Board of Directors.  No dividends will be paid with respect to the common stock or Series A-1 preferred stock or Series B preferred stock until any declared dividends on the Series A preferred stock and Series B preferred stock have been paid or set aside for payment to the Series A preferred stock holders and the Series B preferred stock holders.  Holders of Series A-1 preferred stock and Series B preferred stock are not entitled to receive dividends in preference and priority to, or on a pari passu basis with, the other preferred stock or the common stock. To date, no dividends have been declared on any of PMI’s preferred stock or common stock, and there are no dividends in arrears at JuneSeptember 30, 2013.

The holders of PMI’s Series D, Series E and Series F preferred stock were entitled to receive an annual dividend per share in an amount equal to 8% times the liquidation preference for such share, payable in preference and priority to any declaration or payment of any distribution on common stock in such calendar year.  The right to receive dividends on shares of PMI’s Series D, Series E and Series F preferred stock was cumulative from and after the date of issuance of such shares and were payable only when, as, and if declared by the Board of Directors.  Holders of PMI’s Series E-1 preferred stock were not entitled to receive dividends in preference and priority to, or on a pari passu basis with, the other preferred stock or the common stock. Dividends on shares of PMI’s Series E-1 preferred stock were payable only when, as, and if declared by the Board of Directors.  All shares of PMI’s Series D, E, E-1 and F preferred stock were converted to common stock in connection with the January 2013 sale of PMI’s new Series A and A-1 preferred stock.

Conversion

On January 15, 2013, PMI entered into an equity financing transaction where shares of PMI’s preferred stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the financing (“Old Preferred Shares”) were converted into shares of PMI common stock. For holders of Old Preferred Shares who participated in the financing in proportion to their pro rata ownership interest in PMI, their Old Preferred Shares converted into common shares at a ratio of 1:1. In addition, each such participating holder received a share of PMI’s new Series A-1 preferred stock for every dollar of liquidation preference associated with an Old Preferred Share held by such holder. Each share of Series A-1 preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $1.00 and converts into common stock at a ratio of 1,000,000:1.
13


Under the terms of PMI’s new Series A preferred stock (the “Shares”), the holders of such Shares have the right to convert the Shares into common stock at any time. In addition, the Shares automatically convert into common stock (i) immediately prior to the closing of an IPO that values PMI at least at $200,000 and that results in aggregate proceeds to PMI of at least $40,000 or (ii) upon a written request from the holders of at least 70% of the voting power of the outstanding preferred stock (on an as-converted basis). In addition, if a holder of the Shares has converted any of the Shares, then all of such holder’s shares of Series A-1 preferred stock also will be converted upon a liquidation event. In lieu of any fractional shares of common stock to which a holder would otherwise be entitled, PMI shall pay such holder cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of such fractional shares, as determined by PMI’s Board of Directors. At present, the new Series A preferred stock converts into PMI common stock at a 1:1 ratio while the Series A-1 preferred stock converts into PMI common stock at a 1,000,000:1 ratio.

On September 23, 2013, PMI entered into an equity financing transaction with certain new investors and certain of its existing investors (each, a “Series B Share Purchaser” and, collectively, the “Series B Share Purchasers”), pursuant to which, PMI issued and sold to such Series B Share Purchasers (either directly or through certain of their respective affiliates) 8,288,734 shares of PMI’s Series B Preferred Stock (the “Shares”) for an aggregate purchase price of $24,880, net of issuance costs. Under the terms of the Shares, the Share Purchasers have the right to convert the Shares into common stock at any time. In addition, the Shares automatically convert into common stock (i) immediately prior to the closing of an IPO that values PMI at least at $200,000 and that results in aggregate proceeds to PMI of at least $40,000 or (ii) upon a written request from the holders of at least 60% of the voting power of the outstanding Preferred Stock (on an as-converted basis) including at least 14% of the voting power of the outstanding Series A-1 Preferred Stock. In lieu of any fractional shares of common stock to which a holder would otherwise be entitled, PMI shall pay such holder cash in an amount equal to the fair market value of such fractional shares, as determined by PMI’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). At present, the Series B Preferred Stock converts into PMI common stock at a 1:1 ratio.
14

Liquidation Rights

PMI issued 51,171,9515,117,182 shares at the par value $0.001$0.01 per share of Series A-1 convertible preferred stock to certain previous holders of PMI’s preferred stock who participated in the new Series A preferred stock sale. The Series A-1 shares established certain liquidation rights, have no voting rights and are convertible into one share of PMI common stock for every one million shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. PMI allocated the fair value of the shares of Series A-1 preferred stock at the par value of $.001$0.01 per share from the proceeds of new Series A preferred stock. Upon issuance of PMI’s new Series A and Series A-1 preferred stock, all of PMI’s preferred stock existing prior to such issuance was converted into PMI common stock at a 1:1 ratio if the holder of the preferred stock participated in the new Series A preferred stock sale or at a 10:1 ratio if the holder of the preferred stock did not so participate.
The number of shares reflects a 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected by the Company on October 29, 2013.
Voting

Each holder of shares of preferred stock shall be entitled to the number of votes equal to the number of shares of common stock into which such shares of preferred stock could be converted and shall have voting rights and powers equal to the voting rights and powers of the common stock (except as otherwise expressly provided in PMI’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation or as required by law), voting together with the common stock as a single class, and shall be entitled to notice of any stockholders’ meeting in accordance with the Bylaws of PMI. The holders of preferred stock shall vote as one class with the holders of the common stock except with respect to certain matters that require separate votes.

Common Stock

PMI, through its certificate of incorporation, is the sole issuer of common stock and related options and warrants. PMI was authorized to issue up to 277,363,46041,487,465 shares of common stock, $0.001$0.01 par value, of which 65,708,36513,799,063 shares were issued and outstanding as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013.  As of December 31, 2012, there were 82,630,0038,263,000 shares of common stock authorized, $0.001$0.01 par value, of which 3,006,745482,938 shares were issued and outstanding.  Each holder of common stock shall be entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held.

On October 29, 2013, the Company amended and restated its Certificate of Incorporation to effect a 1-for-10 reverse stock split. The total number of shares of stock which the Company shall have the authority to issue is 68,761,533, consisting of 41,487,465 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 27,274,068 Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, 13,868,152 of which are designated as "Series A Preferred Stock," 5,117,182 of which are designated as "Series B Preferred Stock." Each tens shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective date shall be combined and converted into one share of Common Stock; each ten shares of Series A Preferred Stock, Series A-1 Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective date, shall be combined and converted into one share of Series A Preferred Stock, Series A-1 Preferred Stock Series B Preferred Stock, respectively. No fractional shares shall be issued in connection with the reverse stock split and stockholders who otherwise would be entitled to receive fractional shares of Common Stock or Preferred Stock will be entitled to receive cash in lieu of such fractional shares.
Common Stock Issued upon Exercise of Stock Options

For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, PMI issued 780,7187,286,299 and 25,00013,388 shares of common stock, respectively, upon the exercise of options for cash proceeds of $116$8 and $3,$19, respectively, of which 6,499,459 and zero were unvested, respectively. Certain options are eligible for exercise prior to vesting. Shares issued as a result of early exercise may be subject to repurchase by the Company upon termination of employment or services, at the lesser of the price paid or the fair value of the shares on the repurchase date. At September 30, 2013 and 2012, there were zero shares of common stock outstanding subject to the Company’s right of repurchase. The Company recorded a liability for the exercise of unvested shares, which will be reclassified to common stock and additional paid-in capital as the shares vest.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company repurchased 37,662 shares of restricted stock upon termination of employment of various employees. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, there were no repurchases of restricted stock.
The number of shares reflects a 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected by the Company on October 29, 2013.
Common Stock Issued upon Exercise of Stock Warrants

For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 PMI issued 8,200820 shares of common stock upon the exercise of warrants for $0.01 per share. The number of shares reflects a 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected by the Company on October 29, 2013.

8.
8.Stock Option Plan and Compensation

Incentive stock options are granted to employees at an exercise price not less than 100% of the fair value of PMI’s common stock on the date of grant. Non-statutory stock options are granted to consultants and directors at an exercise price not less than 85% of the fair value of PMI’s common stock on the date of grant. If options are granted to stockholders who hold 10% or more of PMI’s common stock on the option grant date, then the exercise price shall not be less than 110% of the fair value of PMI’s common stock on the date of grant. The fair value is based on a good faith estimate by the Board of Directors at the time of each grant. As there is no active trading market for these options, such estimate may ultimately differ from valuations completed by an independent party. The options generally vest over four years, which is the same as the performance period. In no event are options exercisable more than ten years after the date of grant.

At December 31, 2012, there were 15,239,6641,523,966 stock options available for grant under the 2005 Stock Option Plan (the “Plan”). During the first sixnine months of 2013, the Board of Directors increased the total number of options under the plan by an additional 56,483,41711,110,825 for a total of 71,723,08112,634,791 available for grant.
1415

Option activity under the Option Plan is summarized as follows for the periods below:

 
 Options Issued and Outstanding  Weighted-Average Exercise Price 
 
    
Balance as of January 1, 2013  11,738,168   $0.20 
Options granted (weighted average fair value of $0.01)  10,091   $0.17 
Options exercised  (780,718)  $0.15 
Options canceled  (3,754,931)  $0.23 
Balance as of June 30, 2013  7,212,610   $0.19 
 
        
Options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2013  5,105,188   $0.21 
The share amounts and share prices reflect a 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected by the Company on October 29, 2013.
 Options Issued  Weighted- 
 and Outstanding  Average Exercise 
 
   Price 
     
Balance as of January 1, 2012  1,208,762  $2.10 
Options granted (weighted – average fair value of $0.11)  288,796   1.70 
Options exercised  (13,389)  1.40 
Options canceled  (192,749)  2.20 
Balance as of September 30, 2012  1,291,420  $2.00 
 
        
Balance as of January 1, 2013  1,173,816  $2.00 
Options granted (weighted – average fair value of $0.01)  7,912,949   0.10 
Options exercised - vested  (967,128)  0.20 
Options exercised - nonvested  (6,356,845)  0.10 
Options canceled  (783,309)  1.80 
Balance as of Sept 30, 2013  979,483  $1.90 
 
        
Options outstanding and exercisable at Sept 30, 2013  561,241  $1.30 
The number of options reflects a 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected by the Company on October 29, 2013.

Other Information Regarding Stock Options

Additional information regarding PMI common stock options outstanding as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 is as follows:
  Options Outstanding  
 
  
 
  Options Exercisable  
 
 
Range of Exercise
Prices
  Number Outstanding  
Weighted –
Avg.
Remaining
Life
  
Weighted –
Avg.
Exercise
Price
  
Intrinsic
Value
  
Number
Vested
  
Weighted -
Avg.
Exercise
Price
  
Intrinsic
Value
 
$0.10 - $0.10   302,196   9.87  $0.10  $-   51,925  $0.10  $- 
$1.20 - $1.20   171,187   7.96   1.20   -   119,216   1.20   - 
$1.70 - $1.70   172,173   8.64   1.70   -   66,930   1.70   - 
$2.00 - $2.00   300,077   6.81   2.00   -   289,320   2.00   - 
$2.50 - $2.50   1,500   1.8   2.50   -   1,500   2.50   - 
$5.00 - $5.00   11,000   2.92   5.00   -   11,000   5.00   - 
$5.60 - $5.60   18,250   5.96   5.60   -   18,250   5.60   - 
$19.40 - $19.40   3,100   5.3   19.40   -   3,100   19.40   - 
$0.10 - $19.40   979,483   8.21  $1.40  $-   561,241  $1.30  $- 

  Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices  Number Outstanding  Weighted Avg. Remaining Life  Weighted Avg. Exercise Price Intrinsic Value Number Exercisable  Weighted Avg. Exercise Price Intrinsic Value
$0.12 - $0.12   1,829,872   8.21   0.12 $-  1,200,890   0.12 $-
$0.17 - $0.17   1,953,711   8.87   0.17 -  626,966   0.17 -
$0.20 - $0.20   3,090,527   7.06   0.20 -  2,945,082   0.20 -
$0.25 - $0.25   15,000   2.05   0.25 -  15,000   0.25 -
$0.50 - $0.50   110,000   3.18   0.50 -  110,000   0.50 -
$0.56 - $0.56   182,500   6.21   0.56 -  176,250   0.56 -
$1.94 - $1.94   31,000   5.55   1.94 -  31,000   1.94 -
$0.12 - $1.94   7,212,610   7.74   $0.19 $-  5,105,188   0.21 $-
The number of options reflects a 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected by the Company on October 29, 2013.

The intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the value of PMI's common stock at JuneSeptember 30, 2013, which was $0.01 per share, and the exercise price of the options.

No compensation expense is recognized for unvested shares that are forfeited upon termination of service, and the stock-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012 reflect the expenses that PMI expects to recognize after the consideration of estimated forfeitures.

16

PMI estimates its forfeiture rate based on an analysis of its actual forfeitures and will continue to evaluate the adequacy of the forfeiture rate based on actual forfeiture experience, analysis of employee turnover behavior, and other factors. The impact from a forfeiture rate adjustment will be recognized in full in the period of adjustment, and if the actual number of future forfeitures differs from that estimate, PMI may be required to record adjustments to stock-based compensation expense in future periods.
15


The fair value of PMI stock option awards for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012 was estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model with the following average assumptions:

Three months ended
June 30,
 
Six months ended
June 30,
 
Three months ended
September 30,
  
Nine months ended
September 30,
 
2013 2012 2013 2012 2013  2012  2013  2012 
Volatility of common stock** ** 73.43% 77.10%  69.57%  75.00%  69.56%  76.20%
Risk-free interest rate** ** 0.82% 0.97%  1.39%  0.72%  1.90%  0.86%
Expected life*** ** 8.7 years 5.0 years 5.8 years  5.1 years  5.8 years  5.0 years 
Dividend yield** ** 0% 0%  0%  0%  0%  0%
Weighted-average fair value of grants** ** $0.01 0.11 $0.01  $0.10  $0.01  $0.10 

*For nonemployee stock option awards, the expected life is the contractual term of the award, which is generally ten years.
**No stock option awards were granted during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and June 30, 2012.

The Black-Scholes model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility. Because PMI's equity awards have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, the changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.

Total stock-based compensation expense for PMI employees reflected in the statements of operations for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012 is approximately $84$184 and $169,$272, respectively, and $34$100 and $88$103 for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012.  As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, the unamortized stock-based compensation expense related to PMI employees’ unvested stock-based awards was approximately $92,$322, which will be recognized over the remaining weighted average vesting period of approximately 2.53.0 years.

9.
9.Income Taxes

As part of the process of preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements, PMI Group is required to estimate its income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates. This process involves determining the income tax expense (benefit) together with calculating the deferred income tax expense (benefit) related to temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items, such as fair value of loans or deductibility of certain intangible assets, for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within the accompanying balance sheet. PMI Group must then assess the likelihood that the deferred tax assets will be recovered through the generation of future taxable income.

Due to the book and tax net losses incurred during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, zero income tax expense has been incurred during those periods. In addition, substantial historical losses hashave been incurred and the company has maintained a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets because the realization of those deferred tax assets is dependent upon future earnings, and the amount and timing of those earnings, if any is uncertain.

10.
10.Commitments and Contingencies

Future Minimum Lease Payments

The corporate office and co-location facility is under non-cancelable operating leases that expire in December 2014 and August 2014, respectively.

Future minimum rental payments under these leases as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 are as follows:

2013  $296  $132 
2014  501   502 
Total future operating lease obligations  $797  $634 

17

Rental expense under premises-operating lease arrangements was $201$165 and $337$502 for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and $129$134 and $264$398 for the corresponding periods during 2012, respectively.

PMI Group amended and restated an agreement with WebBank, an FDIC-insured Utah-chartered industrial bank, under which all loans originated through the platform are made by WebBank under its bank charter. The arrangement allows for loans to be offered to borrowers at uniform nationwide terms. PMI Group is required to pay the greater of a monthly minimum fee or a fee calculated based on a certain percentage of monthly loan origination volume.

16

PMI Group has an agreement with a third party broker-dealer in which the third party agreed to operate and maintain the Note Trader Platform for the secondary trading of PMI Group Notes.  PMI Group is required to pay the third party broker-dealer an agreed upon monthly fee which equals the difference between the minimum monthly fee and the transaction fees collected by the third party provider during that month.

Securities Law Compliance

From inception through October 16, 2008, PMI sold approximately $178,000 of borrower loans to lender members through the old platform structure, whereby PMI assigned promissory notes directly to lender members. PMI did not register the offer and sale of the promissory notes corresponding to these loans under the Securities Act or under the registration or qualification provisions of any state securities laws. The question of whether or not the operation of the platform during this period constituted an offer or sale of “securities” involved a complicated factual and legal analysis and was uncertain. If the sales of promissory notes offered through the platform during this period were viewed as a securities offering, PMI would have failed to comply with the registration and qualification requirements of federal and state laws and lender members who hold these promissory notes may be entitled to rescission of unpaid principal, plus statutory interest. Generally, the federal statute of limitations for noncompliance with the requirement to register securities under the Securities Act is one year from the violation, although the statute of limitations period under various state laws may be for a longer period of time.

PMI’s decision to restructure the platform and cease sales of promissory notes offered through the platform effective October 16, 2008 limited this contingent liability to the period covering its activities prior to October 16, 2008.

On April 21, 2009, PMI and the North American Securities Administrators Association (“NASAA”) reached agreement on the terms of a model consent order between PMI and the states in which PMI offered loan notes for sale prior to November 2008. The consent order involves payment by PMI of up to an aggregate of $1,000 in penalties, which have been allocated among the states based on PMI’s promissory note sale transaction volume in each state prior to November 2008. A state that enters into a consent order receives its portion of the $1,000 in exchange for its agreement to terminate, or refrain from initiating, any investigation of PMI’s note sale activities prior to November 2008.  Penalties are paid promptly after a state enters into a consent order. NASAA has recommended that each state enter into a consent order.  However, no state is obliged to do so, and there is no deadline by which a state must make its decision. PMI is not required to pay any portion of the penalty to those states that do not elect to enter into a consent order. If a state does not enter into a consent order, it is free to pursue its own remedies against PMI, subject to any applicable statute of limitations. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, PMI Group has entered into consent orders with thirty-four states and has paid an aggregate of $466 in penalties to those states.

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, PMI Group had accrued approximately $248 and $248, respectively, in connection with the contingent liability associated with the states that have not entered into consent orders, in accordance with ASC Topic 450, Contingencies. The methodology applied to estimate the accrual was to divide the $1,000 maximum fee pro-rata by state, using PMI’s note sales from inception through November 2008. A weighting was then applied by state to each state that has not entered into a consent order, assigning likelihood that the penalty will be claimed. In estimating the probability of a claim being made by a state, PMI Group considered factors such as the standard terms of the consent orders; whether the state ever gave any indication of concern regarding the sale of promissory notes through the platform; the probability of a state electing not to enter into a consent order in order to pursue its own litigation against PMI; whether the penalty is sufficient to compensate a state for the cost of processing the settlement consent order; and finally the impact that current economic conditions have had on state governments.  PMI Group will continue to evaluate this accrual and related assumptions as new information becomes known.

In 2008 plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit (“Hellum Litigation”) against PMI and certain of its executive officers and directors in the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, California (“Superior Court”).  The suit was brought on behalf of all promissory note purchasers on the platform from January 1, 2006 through October 14, 2008.  The lawsuit alleged that PMI offered and sold unqualified and unregistered securities in violation of the California and federal securities laws.  The lawsuit sought class certification, damages and the right of rescission against PMI and the other named defendants, as well as treble damages against PMI and the award of attorneys’ fees, experts’ fees and costs, and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest.

As described in Note 13, Subsequent Events, on18

On July 19, 2013, solely to avoid the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation, and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, the parties to the Hellum Litigation pending before the Superior Court, entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement, and Release (the “Settlement”) setting forth an agreement to settle all claims related thereto. In connection with the Settlement, PMI agreed to pay the plaintiffs, and took the charge on the income statement, the plaintiffs an aggregate amount of $10,000, payable into four annual installmentsaccording to the following schedule: (i) $2,000 within 10 days of entry of an order by the Court granting preliminary approval of the settlement (“Preliminary Approval”); (ii) $2,000 in 2013, $2,000 in 2014,on the one-year anniversary of Preliminary Approval; (iii) $3,000 in 2015on the two-year anniversary of Preliminary Approval; and (iv) $3,000 in 2016.on the three-year anniversary of Preliminary Approval. The settlement is subject to final approval by the Superior Court. Subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the Settlement, the defendants will be released by the plaintiffs from all claims concerning or arising out of the offering of promissory notes on the platform from January 1, 2006 through October 14, 2008.
17


As a result of the settlement,Settlement, PMI recorded the Settlement in the condensed consolidated statement of operations and a reserve for class action settlement liability of $10,000 in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013.

11.
11.Related Parties

PMI Group’s executive officers, directors who are not executive officers, and certain affiliates participate on PMI Group’s lending platform by placing bids and purchasing Notes.  The aggregate amount of Notes and Borrower Loans purchased and the income earned by parties deemed to be affiliates and related parties of PMI Group as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012 are summarized below:

Related Party 
Aggregate Amount of Borrower Loans
and Notes Purchased June 30,
  
Income Earned on Borrower
Loans and Notes for the six
months ended June 30,
  
Aggregate Amount of Borrower Loans and Notes
Purchased September 30,
  
Income Earned on Borrower Loans and
Notes for the nine months ended
September 30,
 
 2013  2012  2013  2012  2013  2012  2013  2012 
Executive officers and management  $722   $179   $142   $8  $806  $227  $30  $13 
Directors  4,323   2,930   25   145   4,578   3,127   204   223 
Affiliate  -   1,161   -   61 
  $5,045   $4,270   $167   $214  $5,384  $3,354  $234  $236 

The Notes and Borrower Loans were obtained on terms and conditions that were not more favorable than those obtained by other Note and Borrower Loan purchasers. Of the total aggregate amount of Notes and Borrower Loans purchased since inception approximately $308$359 or 6%7% and $179$148 or 4% of principal has been charged off through JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The revenue earned is approximately $9$14 and $11$12 in servicing fee revenue related to these Notes and Borrower Loans for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

12.
12.Post-retirement Benefit Plans

PMI has a 401(k) plan that covers all employees meeting certain eligibility requirements. The 401(k) plan is designed to provide tax-deferred retirement benefits in accordance with the provisions of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible employees may defer up to 90% of eligible compensation up to the annual maximum as determined by the Internal Revenue Service.  PMI’s contributions to the plan are discretionary. PMI has not made any contributions to the plan to date.

13. Subsequent Events

On July 17, 2013, Kenneth Niewald was appointed Chief Financial Officer of PMI.

On July 19, 2013, PMI agreed to enter into a Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement, and Release (the “Settlement”) related to the action captioned Christian Hellum, David Booth, Brian Russom, and Michael del Greco, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Prosper Marketplace, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Christian Larsen, Ed Giedgowd, Kirk T. Inglis, Doug Fuller, James W. Breyer, Larry W. Cheng, Robert C. Kagle, and John and Jane Does 1-100, No. CGC-08-482329, which is currently pending in the Superior Court.  In exchange for a full release of the Claims as to all class members against all defendants, and subject to Court approval, PMI agreed to pay settlement consideration in the total amount of $10,000 according to the following schedule: (i) $2,000 within 10 days of entry of an order by the Court granting preliminary approval of the settlement (“Preliminary Approval”); (ii) $2,000 on the one-year anniversary of Preliminary Approval; (iii) $3,000 on the two-year anniversary of Preliminary Approval; and (iv) $3,000 on the three-year anniversary of Preliminary Approval. See Note 10 Commitments and Contingencies.
13.Subsequent Events
 
The 2005 Stock Plan (the “Plan”) wasOn October 29, 2013, the Company amended and restated on July 19, 2013its Certificate of Incorporation to increase the maximum aggregateeffect a 1-for-10 reverse stock split. The total number of shares that mayof stock which the Company shall have the authority to issue is 68,761,533, consisting of 41,487,465 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share, and 27,274,068 Preferred Stock, $0.01 par value per share, 13,868,152 of which are designated as "Series A Preferred Stock," 5,117,182 of which are designated as "Series B Preferred Stock." Each tens shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective date shall be combined and converted into one share of Common Stock; each ten sahres of Series A Preferred Stock, Series A-1 Preferred Stock, Series B Preferred Stock, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective date, shall be combined and converted into one share of Series A Preferred Stock, Series A-1 Preferred Stock Series B Preferred Stock, respectively. No fractional shares shall be issued under the Plan from 71,723,081 shares to 94,359,621. On August 1, 2013, a Form S-8 registering the shares reserved for issuance under the Plan was filedin connection with the SEC. On August 5, 2013, the California Departmentreverse stock split and stockholders who otherwise would be entitled to recieve fractional shares of Business Oversight approved the amendmentCommon Stock or Preferred Stock will be entitled to qualificationreceive cash in lieu of the Plan.such fractional shares.
1819

Schedule I

Prosper Funding LLC
Condensed Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)
(amounts in thousands)

    
 
June 30,
2013
  
December 31,
2012
  
September 30,
2013
  
December 31,
2012
 
Assets 
  
  
  
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents  $3,510   $5  $3,167  $5 
Restricted Cash  4,119   -   5,113   - 
Loans Held for Investment at Fair Value  152   -   137   - 
Borrower Loans Receivable at Fair Value  187,125   -   204,131   - 
Property and Equipment, net  1,023   -   1,593   - 
Intercompany Receivable  71   - 
Total Assets  $196,000   $5  $214,141  $5 
                
Liabilities and Member's Equity        
Accounts Payable  $24   $- 
Accrued Liabilities  1,185   - 
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity        
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities $1,312  $- 
Notes at Fair Value  187,489   -   204,465   - 
Loan Loss Reserve  165   -   61   - 
Intercompany Payable  518   - 
Total Liabilities  188,863   -   206,356   - 
                
Member's Equity                
Member's Equity  6,075   210   6,075   210 
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)  1,062   (205)  1,710   (205)
Total Member's Equity  7,137   5   7,785   5 
Total Liabilities and Member's Equity  $196,000   $5  $214,141  $5 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
19

Prosper Funding LLC
Condensed Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
(amounts in thousands)

 
 Three months ended June 30,  Six months ended  From February 17, 2012 (date of inception) to 
 
 2013  2012  June 30, 2013  June 30, 2012 
Revenues        
Administration Fee Revenue  $1,528   $-   $2,135   $- 
Interest Income on Borrower Loans  8,578   -   13,651   - 
Interest Expense on Notes  (8,128)  -   (12,946)  - 
Total Revenues  1,978   -   2,840   - 
 
                
Cost of Revenues                
Cost of Services  (338)  -   (563)  - 
Provision for Loan Losses  (50)  -   (149)  - 
Net revenues  1,590   -   2,128   - 
 
                
Operating Expenses                
Administration Fee Expense  631   -   1,012   - 
Depreciation and Amortization  124   -   207   - 
Professional Services  5   17   20   82 
Other Operating Expenses  50   -   94   59 
Total Operating Expenses  810   17   1,333   141 
Income (Loss) Before Other Income and Expenses  780   (17)  795   (141)
 
                
Other Income and Expenses                
Change in FV on Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Investment and Notes, net  312   -   487   - 
Other Expense  (14)  -   (15)  - 
Total Other Income and Expenses, net  298   -   472   - 
 
                
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes  $1,078   $(17)  $1,267   $(141)
Provision For Income Taxes  -   -   -   - 
Total Net Income (Loss)  $1,078   $(17)  $1,267   $(141)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
20

Prosper Funding LLC
Condensed Statements of Cash FlowsOperations
(Unaudited)
(amounts in thousands)

 
 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2013
  
From February 17, 2012 (date of inception) to
June 30, 2012
 
 
    
Cash flows from operating activities:    
Net Income (loss)  $1,267   $(141)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
Change in fair value of Notes  (4,573)   
Change in fair value of Borrower Loans  4,082    
Depreciation and amortization  207    
Loan loss Reserve  124    
Change in fair value of Loans held for investment  3    
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:       
Restricted cash  25    
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  430    
Net Intercompany Payable  (71)   
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  1,494   (141)
 
        
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Origination of Borrower Loans held at fair value  (65,053)   
Repayment of Borrower Loans held at fair value  44,190    
Purchases of property and equipment  (509)   
Repayment of Loans held for investment at fair value  49    
Origination of Loans held for investment at fair value  (29)   
Net cash used in investing activities  (21,352)   
 
        
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from issuance of Notes held at fair value  65,053    
Payment of Notes held at fair value  (43,565)   
Net cash included in transfer of assets from PMI  1,875    
Proceeds from Member's equity     146 
Net cash provided by financing activities  23,363   146 
 
        
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  3,505   5 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period  5    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period  $3,510   $5 
 
 Three months ended September 30,  
Nine months ended
September 30,
  
From February  17,
2012 (date of
inception) to
September 30,
 
 
 2013  2012  2013  2012 
Revenues 
  
  
  
 
Administration Fee Revenue - Related Party $2,042  $-  $4,178  $- 
Interest Income on Borrower Loans  9,039   -   22,687   - 
Interest Expense on Notes  (8,435)  -   (21,380)  - 
Total Revenues  2,646   -   5,485   - 
 
                
Cost of Revenues                
Cost of Services  (357)  -   (920)  - 
Reversal of (Provision for) Loan Losses  66   -   (83)  - 
Net revenues  2,355   -   4,482   - 
 
                
Expenses                
Administration Fee Expense - Related Party  1,521   -   2,534   - 
Depreciation and Amortization  149   -   355   - 
Professional Services  6   8   26   90 
Other  62   19   157   78 
Total Expenses  1,738   27   3,072   168 
Income (Loss) Before Other Income and Expenses  617   (27)  1,410   (168)
 
                
Other Income and Expenses                
Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans, Loans Held for Investment and Notes, net  91   -   578   - 
Other Expense  (58)  -   (73)  - 
Total Other Income and Expenses, net  33   -   505   - 
 
                
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes  650   (27)  1,915   (168)
Provision For Income Taxes  -   -   -   - 
Total Net Income (Loss) $650  $(27) $1,915  $(168)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.
21

Prosper Funding LLC
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(amounts in thousands)
 
 
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2013
  
From February 17,
2012 (date of
inception) to
September 30, 2012
 
 
 
  
 
Cash flows from operating activities: 
  
 
Net Income (loss) $1,915  $(168)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
Change in fair value of Notes  (4,484)   
Change in fair value of Borrower Loans  3,903    
Depreciation and amortization  355    
Loan loss reserve  20    
Change in fair value of Loans held for investment  3    
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Restricted cash  (969)   
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  533    
Net Intercompany Payable  518    
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  1,794   (168)
 
        
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Origination of Borrower Loans held at fair value  (108,527)   
Repayment of Borrower Loans held at fair value  70,837    
Purchases of property and equipment  (1,227)   
Repayment of Loans held for investment at fair value  106    
Origination of Loans held for investment at fair value  (71)   
Net cash used in investing activities  (38,882)   
 
        
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from issuance of Notes held at fair value  108,527    
Payment of Notes held at fair value  (70,152)   
Net cash included in transfer of assets from PMI  1,875    
Proceeds from Member's equity     173 
Net cash provided by financing activities  40,250   173 
 
        
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  3,162   5 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period  5    
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period $3,167  $5 
 
        
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:        
Cash paid for interest $20,344  $- 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

22

Prosper Funding LLC
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
(amounts in thousands)

1.
1.Organization and Business

Prosper Funding LLC (“Prosper Funding”) was formed in the state of Delaware in February 2012 as a limited liability company with the sole equity member being Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”).

Prosper Funding was formed by PMI to hold borrower loans and issue borrower payment dependent notes through the platform.  Although Prosper Funding is consolidated with PMI for accounting and tax purposes, Prosper Funding has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it would be substantively consolidated with PMI in a bankruptcy proceeding.  Prosper Funding’s intention is to minimize the likelihood that its assets would be subject to claims by PMI’s creditors if PMI were to file for bankruptcy, as well as to minimize the likelihood that Prosper Funding will become subject to bankruptcy proceedings directly.  Prosper Funding seeks to achieve this by placing certain restrictions on its activities and implementing certain formal procedures designed to expressly reinforce its status as a distinct corporate entity from PMI.

On January 22, 2013, PMI entered into an Asset Transfer Agreementasset transfer agreement with Prosper Funding (the “Asset Transfer Agreement”), pursuant to which PMI transferred substantially all of its remaining assets to Prosper Funding, including (i) all outstanding notes issued by PMI under the Indenture dated June 15, 2009 between PMI and Wells Fargo Bank, as trustee, (ii) all borrower loans held by PMI, (iii) all lender/borrower/group leader registration agreements related to the notes or the borrower loans, and (iv) all documents and information related to the foregoing, effective February 1, 2013.

Prosper Funding commenced operations as of February 1, 2013 when PMI transferred ownership of the platform, including all of the rights related to the operation of the platform, to Prosper Funding. Since February 1, 2013, all notes issued and sold through the platform are issued, sold and serviced by Prosper Funding (together with the notes transferred from PMI, the “Notes”).  Pursuant to a Loan Account Program Agreement between PMI and WebBank, PMI manages the operation of the platform, as agent of WebBank, in connection with the submission of loan applications by potential borrowers, the making of related loans by WebBank and the funding of such loans by WebBank. Pursuant to an Administration Agreement between Prosper Funding and PMI, PMI manages all other aspects of the platform on behalf of Prosper Funding.

All loans requested and obtained through the platform are unsecured obligations of individual borrower members with a fixed interest rate and loan terms set at three or five years as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013. All loans made through the platform are funded by WebBank, an FDIC-insured, Utah chartered industrial bank.  After funding a loan, WebBank sells the loan to Prosper Funding, without recourse to WebBank, in exchange for the principal amount of the loan (together with the borrower loans transferred from PMI, the “Borrower Loans”).  WebBank does not have any obligation to purchasers of the Notes.

2.
2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

Prosper Funding’s unaudited interim condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“US GAAP”) and disclosure requirements for interim financial information and the requirements of Rule 10-018-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by US GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2012. The balance sheet at December 31, 2012 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date. Management believes these unaudited interim condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments, including those of a normal recurring nature, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year or any other interim period.
2223

Use of Estimates

The preparation of Prosper Funding’s condensed financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosures at the date of the condensed financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates, judgments and assumptions include but are not limited to the following: valuation of Borrower Loans receivable and associated Notes, valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, valuation and amortization periods of intangible assets, provision for loan loss and contingent liabilities. Prosper Funding bases its estimates on historical experience from all Borrower Loans, and on various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain Risks and Concentrations

In the normal course of its business, Prosper Funding encounters two significant types of risk: credit and regulatory. Financial instruments that potentially subject Prosper Funding to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and short term investments. Prosper Funding places cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and short term investments with high-quality financial institutions and is exposed to credit risk in the event of default by these institutions to the extent the amount recorded on the balance sheet exceeds federally insured amounts. Prosper Funding also performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial institutions and has not sustained any credit losses from instruments held at these financial institutions.

To the extent that loan payments are not made, servicing income will be reduced.  Borrower Loans were funded by the Notes and repayment of said Notes is wholly dependent on the repayment of the Borrower Loans associated with the Notes.  As a result, Prosper FundingPMI Group does not bear the risk associated with the repayment of principal on loans carried on its condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Prosper Funding is subject to various regulatory requirements. The failure to appropriately identify and address these regulatory requirements could result in certain discretionary actions by regulators that could have a material effect on Prosper Funding's financial position and results of operations.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Such deposits periodically exceed amounts insured by the FDIC.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists primarily of cash deposits held as collateral as required to supportsecure operating activities.

Borrower Loans and Notes

Prosper Funding has adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments.  ASC Topic 825 permits companies to choose to measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected reported in earnings.  The fair value election, with respect to an item, may not be revoked once an election is made.  In applying the provisions of ASC Topic 825, Prosper Funding has recorded assets and liabilities measured using the fair value option in a way that separates these reported fair values from the carrying values of similar assets and liabilities measured with a different measurement attribute.  Prosper Funding does not record a specific allowance account related to the Borrower Loans and Notes in which it has elected the fair value option, but rather estimates the fair value of the Borrower Loans and Notes using discounted cash flow methodologies adjusted for historical payment, loss and recovery rates of Borrower Loans. An account is considered to be a loss, or charged-off, when it reaches more than 120 days past due.  Prosper Funding has reported the aggregate fair value of the  Borrower Loans and Notes as separate line items in the assets and liabilities sections of the accompanying balance sheets using the methods described in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures—See Fair Value Measurement.

Prosper Funding purchases Borrower Loans from WebBank and, if issuing Notes to lender members to fund its purchase of Borrower Loans, holds the Borrower Loans until maturity, except as may otherwise be determined in connection with the servicing of any Borrower Loan.   Prosper Funding’s obligation to repay the Notes is conditioned upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loan owned by Prosper Funding.  Prosper Funding carries the Borrower Loans and Notes on its balance sheet as assets and liabilities, respectively.  Prosper Funding also purchases Borrower Loans from WebBank and immediately sells them to certain qualified lender members.
2324

Fair Value Measurement

Prosper Funding follows ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which provides guidance regarding a fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes information used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings and provides for enhanced disclosures determined by the level within the hierarchy of information used in the valuation. ASC Topic 820 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances.

ASC Topic 820 defines fair value in terms of the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

The price used to measure the fair value is not adjusted for transaction costs while the cost basis of certain financial instruments may include initial transaction costs. Under ASC Topic 820, the fair value measurement also assumes that the transaction to sell an asset occurs in the principal market for the asset or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset. The principal market is the market in which the reporting entity would sell or transfer the asset with the greatest volume and level of activity for the asset. In determining the principal market for an asset or liability under ASC Topic 820, it is assumed that the reporting entity has access to the market as of the measurement date. If no market for the asset exists or if the reporting entity does not have access to the principal market, the reporting entity should use a hypothetical market.

Under ASC Topic 820, assets and liabilities carried at fair value in the balance sheets are classified among three levels based on the observability of the inputs used to determine fair value:

Level 1 — The valuation is based on quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments.

Level 2 — The valuation is based on observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

Level 3 — The valuation is based on unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the instrument. Level 3 valuations are typically performed using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, which incorporate management’s own estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instrument or valuations that require significant management judgment or estimation.

Fair value of financial instruments are determined based on the fair value hierarchy established in ASC Topic 820, which requires an entity to maximize the use of quoted prices and observable inputs and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Various valuation techniques are utilized, depending on the nature of the financial instrument, including the use of market prices for identical or similar instruments, or discounted cash flow models. When possible, active and observable market data for identical or similar financial instruments are utilized. Alternatively, fair value is determined using assumptions that management believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.

Financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, short term investments, Borrower Loans receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, Notes and long-term debt.  The estimated fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying values because of their short term nature.

Borrower Loans Notes, cash equivalents and Notesrestricted cash are accounted for on a fair value basis.

The following table presents the assets & liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2013, and December 31, 2012:
September 30, 2013 Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs  Fair Value 
Assets 
  
  
  
 
Borrower Loans receivable $-  $-  $204,131  $204,131 
Certificates of Deposit  -   1,269   -   1,269 
Loans held for investment  -   -   137   137 
Liabilities                
Notes $-  $-  $204,465  $204,465 
 
                
December 31, 2012                
Assets $-  $-  $-  $- 
Borrower Loans receivable                
Certificates of Deposit  -   -   -   - 
Borrower Loans held for investment  -   -   -   - 
Liabilities                
Notes $-  $-  $-  $- 
Internal Use Software and Website Development

Internal use software costs and website development costs are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 350-40, Internal Use Software, and ASC Topic 350-50, Website Development Costs. In accordance with ASC Topic 350-40 and 350-50, the costs to develop software for Prosper Funding's website and other internal uses are capitalized when management has authorized and committed project funding, preliminary development efforts are successfully completed, and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used as intended. Capitalized software development costs primarily include software licenses acquired, fees paid to outside consultants, salaries and payroll related costs for PMI employees directly involved in the development efforts.

25

Costs incurred prior to meeting these criteria, together with costs incurred for training and maintenance, are expensed. Costs incurred for upgrades and enhancements that are considered to be probable to result in additional functionality are capitalized. Capitalized costs are included in property and equipment and amortized to expense using the straight-line method over their expected lives. Prosper Funding evaluates its software assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable.  Recoverability of software assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset to the future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset.  If such software assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of the software asset.
24


 Loan Loss Reserve

Prosper Funding is obligated to indemnify lenders and or repurchase certain Notes sold to the lenders in the event of violation of applicable federal, state, or local lending laws, or verifiable identify theft. The loan loss reserve is estimated based on historical experience and is accrued when the Notes are issued. Indemnified or repurchased Notes are written off at the time of repurchase or at the time an indemnification payment is made.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition.  Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered, the price of the services is fixed and determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

Administration Agreement License Fees

Prosper Funding primarily generates revenues through license fees it earns through an Administration Agreement with PMI.  The Administration Agreement contains a license granted by Prosper Funding to PMI that entitles PMI to use the platform for and in relation to: (i) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement relating to corporate administration, loan platform services, loan and note servicing and marketing, and (ii) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations to WebBank in relation to loan origination and funding.

Loan Servicing Fees

Loan servicing fees are accrued daily based on the current outstanding loan principal balance of the Borrower Loan but are not recognized until payment is received due to the uncertainty of collection of borrower loan payments.

Interest Income on Borrower Loans Receivable and Interest Expense on Notes

Interest income on Borrower Loans is recognized using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent that is believed it to be collectable.  Interest expense is recorded on the corresponding Notes based on the contractual interest rate.  Below is a table that summarizes the gross interest income and expense for the three and sixnine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

 
Three months ended
June 30,
  
Six months
ended June 30,
  
From February
17, 2012 (date
of inception) to
June 30,
  
Three months ended
September 30,
  
Nine months ended
September 30,
  
From February
17, 2012 (date of
inception) to
September 30,
 
 2013  2012  2013  2012  2013  2012  2013  2012 
Interest Income on Borrower Loans  $8,578   $-   $13,651   $-  $9,039  $-  $22,687  $- 
Interest Expense on Notes  (8,128)  -   (12,946)  -   (8,435) -   (21,380) - 
Net Interest Income (Expense) on Loans & Notes  $450   $-   $705   $-  $604  $-  $1,307  $- 

Comprehensive Income

There is no comprehensive income (loss) other than the net income (loss) disclosed in the condensed statement of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There have been no recentWe do not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a material impact on our results of operations, financial position or changes in accounting pronouncements during the six months ended June 30, 2013 that are of significance, or potential significance.cash flows.
2526

3.
3.Borrower Loans and Notes Held at Fair Value

The following tables present the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at JuneSeptember 30, 2013.

June 30, 2013 Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs  Fair Value 
September 30, 2013 Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs  Fair Value 
Assets         
  
  
  
 
Borrower Loans receivable  $-   $-   $187,125  $187,125  $-  $-  $204,131  $204,131 
Loans held for investment  -   -   152   152   -   -   137   137 
Liabilities                                
Notes  $-   $-  $187,489  $187,489  $-  $-  $204,465  $204,465 

As observable market prices are not available for the Borrower Loans and Notes Prosper Funding holds, or for similar assets and liabilities, the Prosper Funding believes the Borrower Loans and Notes should be considered Level 3 financial instruments under ASC Topic 820.  In a hypothetical transaction as of the measurement date, Prosper Funding believes that differences in the principal marketplace in which the loans are originated and the principal marketplace in which it might offer those loans may result in differences between the originated amount of the loans and their fair value as of the transaction date.  For Borrower Loans, the fair value is estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon valuation assumptions including prepayment speeds, roll rates, recovery rates and discount rates based on the perceived credit risk within each credit grade.

The obligation to pay principal and interest on any Note is equal to the loan payments, if any, that are received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of its servicing fee.  The fair value election for Notes and Borrower Loans allows both the assets and the related liabilities to receive similar accounting treatment for expected losses which is consistent with the subsequent cash flows to lenders that are dependent upon borrower payments.  As such, the fair value of the Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the Borrower Loans, adjusted for the servicing fee and the timing of borrower payments subsequently disbursed to Note holders.  Any unrealized gains or losses on the Borrower Loans and Notes for which the fair value option has been elected is recorded as a separate line item in the statement of operations.  The effective interest rate associated with the Notes is less than the interest rate earned on the Borrower Loans due to the servicing fee.  See further in this note for a roll-forward and further discussion of the significant assumptions used to value Borrower Loans and Notes.

The fair value of the Notes and Borrower Loans are estimated using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions. The main assumptions used to value the Borrower Loans and Notes include prepayment rates derived from historical prepayment rates for each credit score, default rates derived from historical performance, recovery rates and discount rates applied to each credit tranche based on the perceived credit risk of each credit grade. The obligation to pay principal and interest on any Note is equal to the loan payments, if any, received on the corresponding Borrower Loan, net of the servicing fee.  As such, the fair value of the Notes is approximately equal to the fair value of the Borrower Loans, adjusted for the servicing fee and the timing of borrower payments subsequently disbursed to the Note holders.  The effective interest rate associated with the Notes will be less than the interest rate earned on the Borrower Loans due to the servicing fee.

For Borrower Loans originated and Notes, the following average assumptions were used to determine the fair value as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013:

2013
Monthly prepayment rate speed  1.531.50%
Recovery rate  2.602.50%
Discount rate *  10.5010.00%

*This is the average discount rate among all of the credit grades

Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions at September 30, 2013 for Borrower Loans and Notes are presented in the following table:

 
 Borrower Loans  Notes 
Discount rate assumption:  10.00%  10.00%
Resulting fair value from:        
100 basis point increase $202,015  $199,663 
200 basis point increase  199,623   197,271 
Resulting fair value from:        
100 basis point decrease $206,953  $204,550 
200 basis point decrease  209,509   207,074 
Default rate assumption: 
  
 
Resulting fair value from: 
  
 
10% higher default rates $202,295  $199,926 
20% higher default rates  199,450   197,127 
Resulting fair value from:        
10% lower default rates $206,651  $204,234 
20% lower default rates  208,796   206,364 

27

The changes in Level 3 assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
 Borrower Loans  Notes  Loans Held for Investment  Total  Borrower Loans  Notes  Loans Held for Investment  Total 
Balance at January 1, 2013  $-   $-   $-   $-  $-  $-  $-  $- 
Assets transferred on February 1, 2013  170,344   (170,574)  175   (55)  170,344  (170,574) 175  (55)
Originations  65,053   (65,053)  29   29   108,527  (108,527) 71  71 
Principal repayments and credit losses  (44,190)  43,565   (49)  (674)  (70,837) 70,152  (106) (791)
Change in fair value on Borrower Loans and Notes  (4,082)  4,573   -   491   (3,903) 4,484  -  581 
Change in fair value of loans held for investment  -   -   (3)  (3)  -  -  (3) (3)
Balance at June 30, 2013  $187,125   $(187,489)  $152   $(212)
Balance at September 30, 2013 $204,131  $(204,465) $137  $(197)
26


Due to the recent origination of the Borrower Loans and Notes, the change in fair value attributable to instrument-specific credit risk is immaterial. Prosper Funding had no outstanding Borrower Loans or Notes originated or issued prior to July 13, 2009.  Of the Borrower Loans originated from July 13, 2009 to JuneSeptember 30, 2013, 255285 loans, which were 90 days or more delinquent, totaled an aggregate principal amount of $1,349$1,489 and a fair value of $122$144 as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013.

No other assets or other liabilities were carried at fair value as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013.

4.
4.Loans Held for Investment at Fair Value

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, Prosper Funding retained a total of $152$137 of loans originated through the platform. When a borrower member loan has been funded in whole, or in part, by Prosper Funding, Prosper Funding retains the portion of the borrower’s monthly loan payment that corresponds to the percentage of the loan that Prosper Funding funded. In these cases, Prosper Funding records interest income on these loans.

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Loans Held for Investment
Balance at January 1, 2013$-
Assets transferred on February 1, 2013175
Originations29
Principal repayments and credit losses(49)
Change in fair value of loans held for investment(3)
Balance at June 30, 2013$152
Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Loans Held for Investment 
Balance at January 1, 2013 $- 
Assets transferred on February 1, 2013  175 
Originations  71 
Principal repayments and credit losses  (106)
Change in fair value of loans held for investment  (3)
Balance at September 30, 2013 $137 

Prosper Funding estimates the fair value of the Borrower Loans held for investment using discounted cash flow methodologies based upon a set of valuation assumptions similar to those of all Borrower Loans, which are set forth in Note 3, as they have similar characteristics and Prosper Funding expects these Borrower Loans to behave in a comparable manner.  The valuation assumptions Prosper Funding used to value these Borrower Loans include prepayment rates, default rates and recovery rates derived from historical loan performance data and discount rates based on credit grade applied to each loan.

The fair value adjustment on these Borrower Loans held for investment was zero and $3, which is included in earnings for the sixthree and nine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.  As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013 Prosper Funding had received $184$225 in payments on these Borrower Loans.  As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, there was $36$37 in Borrower Loans held for investment that were charged-off.

5.  Loan Loss Reserve28


Changes in Prosper Funding’s
5.Loan Loss Reserve
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the reversal of (provision for) loan losses was $66 and ($83), respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, and from February 17, 2012 through September 30, 2012, the provision for loan losses was zero, respectively. The balance of the loan loss reserve are summarized below:as of September 30, 2013 was $61 and zero respectively.

Balance at January 1, 2013:6.$-
Assets transferred on February 1, 201341
Provision for loan loss124
Balance at June 30, 2013:$165Member’s Equity

6. Member’s Equity

Prosper Funding is a wholly owned subsidiary of PMI and PMI has made all capital infusions related to the formation and initial operating expenses of Prosper Funding LLC.

7.
7.Subsequent Events

Prosper Funding has evaluated subsequent events for disclosure and recognition and noted no matters that require disclosure herein.
2729

Item 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

This management’s discussion and analysis of consolidated financial condition and results of operations, or MD&A, contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Please see “Forward-Looking Statements” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of the uncertainties, risks and assumptions associated with these statements. This discussion should be read in conjunction with PMI Group's historical condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto, Prosper Funding’s condensed financial statements and related notes thereto and the other disclosures contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The results of operations for the periods reflected herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods, and PMI Group's consolidated actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including but not limited to those included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and those included in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in PMI Group’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
(in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)

Overview

Prosper Marketplace, Inc. (“PMI”) developed and began operating a peer-to-peer online credit platform (the “platform”) in 2006 that permitted its borrower members to apply for loans and lender members to purchase notes issued by PMI, the proceeds of which facilitated the funding of specific loans to borrowers. On February 1, 2013, PMI transferred ownership of the platform, including all of the rights related to the operation of the platform, to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Prosper Funding LLC (“Prosper Funding” and, collectively with PMI, the “PMI Group”). Beginning February 1, 2013, all notes issued and sold through the platform are issued, sold and serviced by Prosper Funding (together with the notes transferred to Prosper Funding, the “Notes”).  Pursuant to an Administration Agreement between PMI and Prosper Funding, PMI manages all aspects of the platform on behalf of Prosper Funding. Pursuant to a Loan Account Program Agreement between PMI and WebBank, PMI manages the operation of the platform, as agent of WebBank, in connection with the submission of loan applications by potential borrowers, the making of related loans by WebBank and the funding of such loans by WebBank.

The platform enables borrower members to request and obtain personal, unsecured loans (together with the notes transferred to Prosper Funding, the“Borrowerthe “Borrower Loans”) by posting anonymous “listings” on the platform indicating the principal amount of the desired loan. PMI assigns a Prosper Rating consisting of letter grades, based in part on the borrower’s credit score, to each member who requested a borrower loan. Borrower members’ Prosper Rating, credit score range, debt-to-income ratios and other credit data are displayed with their listings and are available for viewing by lender members on an anonymous basis.

Listings are automatically allocated to one of two lender member funding channels, based upon a random allocation methodology: (i) the first channel allows lender members to commit to purchase Notes from Prosper Funding, the payments of which are dependent on the payments made on the corresponding Borrower Loan (the “Note Channel”); and (ii) the second channel allows lender members to commit to purchase 100% of a Borrower Loan directly from Prosper Funding (the “Whole Loan Channel”).  The random allocation methodology ensures that there is a fair initial distribution of listings between the two channels.  If, however, a listing is not funded through the Whole Loan Channel within the first hour of its posting, the listing will be removed from the Whole Loan Channel and posted to the Note Channel for the remainder of its listing period.  Such listing will include a designation indicating that it came from the Whole Loan Channel.  The Whole Loan Channel was launched in April 2013 and is only available to certain accredited investor and institutional lender members and is becoming a growing part of Prosper Funding’s business.  Lender members who participate in the Whole Loan Channel are required to enter into a purchase and servicing agreement with Prosper Funding that specifies the parties’ rights and obligations with regard to the sale of Borrower Loans through the Whole Loan Channel and which names Prosper Funding the servicer of such loans.

Borrower Loans originated to borrower members are made by WebBank, an FDIC-insured, Utah-chartered industrial bank, and sold to Prosper Funding. WebBank sells the loan to Prosper Funding, without recourse to WebBank, in exchange for the principal amount of the Borrower Loan. WebBank does not have any obligation to the purchasers of the Notes or subsequent purchasers of the Borrower Loans. PMI verifies the identity of 100% of borrowers using a variety of methods including credit bureau data, other electronic data sources and offline documentary procedures. PMI verifies income and/or employment on a subset of borrowers based on a proprietary algorithm. The intention of the algorithm is to verify income or employment in cases where the self-reported income of the borrower is highly determinative of the borrower’s risk rating.

2830

Prior to February 1, 2013, PMI derived operating revenue from WebBank.  Upon funding a Borrower Loan, WebBank charged the borrower an origination fee equal to a specified percentage of the principal amount of such Borrower Loan.  WebBank, in turn, paid PMI amounts equal to the origination fees as compensation for loan origination activities. PMI also charged lender members a servicing fee equal to an annualized rate set at a percentage of the outstanding principal balance of the corresponding Borrower Loan, which PMI deducted from each lender member’s share of the Borrower Loan payments.

As of February 1, 2013, concurrent with transfer of the platform, PMI continues to receive origination fees directly from WebBank as compensation for its loan origination activities, while PFL charges the servicing fees to lender members. PMI derives additional revenue from the fees it receives from Prosper Funding for the services it provides pursuant to the Administration Agreement.  Prosper Funding has agreed to compensate PMI for its various roles and related services under the Administration Agreement including corporate administration, loan platform servicing, and loan and note servicing fees. Prosper Funding primarily generates revenues through license fees it earns through the Administration Agreement with PMI and the servicing fee it charges lender members.members.

Operating History

The platform was launched on February 13, 2006 and enables borrower members to request and obtain personal, unsecured loans between $2 and $35 by posting anonymous “listings” indicating the principal amount of the desired loan. Borrower Loan terms are subject to minimum and maximum loan amounts determined by the borrower’s Prosper Score created using proprietary models that include numerous factors, at interest rates set by PMI. Interest rates are set for borrower loans based on a Prosper Score, as well as additional factors, such as estimated loss rate, loan terms, general economic environment, previous loans obtained through the platform and competitive conditions.  As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, the platform had facilitated 78,19587,338 Borrower Loans since its launch totaling an aggregate principal amount of approximately $549,997.$644,831. The platform has a limited operating history and PMI has incurred net losses since its inception.  Our net loss was $15,653$4,963 and $3,257$3,987 for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $19,852$24,815 and $7,621$11,608 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

PMI Group funds its operations primarily with proceeds from equity financings, which are described below under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.” The operating plan calls for a continuation of the current strategy of increasing borrower and lender transaction volume and improving the efficiency of the platform to increase revenue until profitability is reached.

Trends and Uncertainties

The peer-to-peer lending industry remains a very innovative and unique industry, and the application of federal and state laws in areas such as securities and consumer finance to the industry is still evolving.  PMI Group will continue to monitor this evolution actively in order to identify and respond quickly to any legislative or regulatory developments that may affect the platform.

During the first half ofnine months ended September 30, 2013, the platform increased its origination and funding volume consistently in terms of both units and total dollar amounts.   PMI Group hopes to continue this trend of growth as both the borrower and lender bases continue to strengthen and become more familiar with the platform.  Over time PMI Group expects the lender base to grow as the platform gains more exposure to potential lenders and establishes PMI Group Notes as a viable investment alternative.

In February 2012, PMI formed Prosper Funding to hold Borrower Loans and issue Notes. Prosper Funding has been organized and operates in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that Prosper Funding would be substantively consolidated with PMI in a bankruptcy proceeding. PMI is the sole equity member of Prosper Funding. Prosper Funding commenced operations on February 1, 2013.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management’s discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations is based on the condensed consolidated financial statements, which has prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosures. Estimates are based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that PMI Group believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant accounting policies which include revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, provision for loan losses and income taxes are more fully described in Note 2 to Prosper Marketplace, Inc.’s condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report.

31

Critical accounting policies are those policies that PMI Group believes present the most complex or subjective measurements and have the most potential to impact its financial position and operating results. While all decisions regarding accounting policies are important, the PMI Group believes that the following policies could be considered critical.
29


Fair Value Measurement

PMI Group determines the fair values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which requires an entity to maximize the use of quoted prices and observable inputs and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. PMI Group uses various valuation techniques depending on the nature of the financial instrument, including the use of market prices for identical or similar instruments, or discounted cash flow models. When possible, active and observable market data for identical or similar financial instruments are utilized. Alternatively, PMI Group determines fair value using assumptions that it believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The estimated fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature.  Short term investments, Borrower Loans held for investment, Borrower Loans, and Notes are accounted for on a fair value basis. For additional information and discussion regarding significant accounting policies surrounding fair value measurement, see Note 2, Note 3 and Note 4 to Prosper Marketplace, Inc.’s condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report.

Borrower Loans and Notes

Overall, if the fair value of the Borrower Loans decrease or increase due to any changes in the PMI Group’s assumptions, there will also be a corresponding decrease or increase in the fair value of the linked Notes. As a result, the effect on the PMI Group’s earnings of adverse changes in key assumptions is mitigated.

As the PMI Group receives scheduled payments of principal and interest on the Borrower Loans it in turn makes principal and interest payments on the Notes. These principal payments reduce the carrying value of the Borrower Loans and Notes. If the PMI Group does not receive payments on the Borrower Loans, the PMI Group is not obligated to and does not make payments on the Notes. The fair value of a Note is approximately equal to the fair value of the corresponding Borrower Loan, less the service fee. If the fair value of the Borrower Loan decreases due to the PMI Group’s expectation regarding both the likelihood of default of the loan and the amount of loss in the event of default, there is also a corresponding decrease in the fair value of the Note (an unrealized gain related to the Note and an unrealized loss related to the Borrower Loan).

Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions at JuneSeptember 30, 2013 for Borrower Loans and Notes are presented in the following table:

 Borrower Loans  Notes  Borrower Loans  Notes 
Discount rate assumption:  10.50%  10.50%  10.00%  10.00%
Decrease in fair value and income (loss) to earnings from:                
100 basis point increase  $186,043   $183,829  $202,015  $199,663 
200 basis point increase  183,991   181,796   199,623   197,271 
Increase in fair value and income (loss) to earnings from:                
100 basis point decrease  $190,309   $188,056  $206,953  $204,550 
200 basis point decrease  192,528   190,254   209,509   207,074 
                
Default rate assumption:                
Decrease in fair value and income (loss) to earnings from:                
10% higher default rates  $186,061   $183,850  $202,295  $199,926 
20% higher default rates  183,733   181,546   199,450   197,127 
Increase in fair value and income (loss) to earnings from:                
10% lower default rates  $190,172   $187,917  $206,651  $204,234 
20% lower default rates  192,184   189,908   208,796   206,364 

For additional information and discussion, see Note 2 and Note 3 to Prosper Marketplace, Inc.’s condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report.

3032

Results of Operations

Revenues

Origination Fees

The PMI Group charges an origination fee equal to a specified percentage of the aggregate principal balance of the Borrower Loan based on the Prosper Rating and terms of the loan.  Origination fees are charged by WebBank and the PMI Group receives amounts equal to those fees as compensation for marketing and underwriting activities.

Prior to April 2012, the PMI Group maintained a single origination fee of 0.50% for AA loans, 3.95% for loans rated A or B and 4.95% for loans rated C to HR .  In April 2012, the schedule was updated to include the loan terms when determining loan origination fees.

 
 
Jan - Apr 2012
 
Apr 2012 - May 2013
Prosper Rating
 
All Loans
 
1 Year Loan *
 
3 Year Loan
 
5 Year Loan
AA
 
0.50%
 
0.50%
 
1.95%
 
4.95%
A
 
3.95%
 
1.95%
 
3.95%
 
4.95%
B
 
3.95%
 
2.95%
 
4.95%
 
4.95%
C - HR
 
4.95%
 
3.95%
 
4.95%
 
4.95%

*
*In April 2013, we stopped offering 1 year loans with no change to 3 year loan or 5 year loan origination fee structure.

In May 2013, the schedule was updated to reflect an origination fee range based on credit profile of the lowest risk customers:

 May 2013 - Jun 2013
 
May 2013 - September 2013
Prosper Rating 3 Year Loan 5 Year Loan
 
3 Year Loan
 
5 Year Loan
AA 1.00% - 1.95% 1.95% - 4.95%
 
1.00% - 1.95%
 
1.95% - 4.95%
A 3.95% 4.95%
 
3.95%
 
4.95%
B 4.95% 4.95%
C - HR 4.95% 4.95%
B - HR
 
4.95%
 
4.95%

Origination fees for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012 were $3,342$4,409 and $1,757,$2,083, respectively, representing an increase of $1,585,$2,326, or 90%112%, which was primarily due to the PMI Group’s higher origination volume during 2013. Origination fees for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012 were $4,914$9,323 and $3,139,$5,223, respectively, representing an increase of $1,775,$4,100, or 57%78%, which was primarily due to the PMI Group’s higher origination volume during 2013.

Origination Volume

From inception to JuneSeptember 30, 2013, the PMI Group has originated a total of 78,19587,338 in borrower loans totaling $549,997.$644,831.

The PMI Group originated 7,0999,143 Borrower Loans totaling $72,777$94,834 during the secondthird quarter of 2013, compared to 5,0615,632 Borrower Loans totaling $38,010$45,074 originated during the secondthird quarter of 2012.  This represented a “unit” or loan, increase of 40.3%62% and a dollar increase of 91.5%110% over the corresponding periods in 2012.

The PMI Group originated 10,71519,858 Borrower Loans totaling $106,720$201,554 during the first sixnine months of 2013, compared to 9,49615,128 Borrower Loans totaling $71,074$116,148 originated during the first sixnine months of 2012.  This represented a “unit” or loan, increase of 13%31% and a dollar increase of 50%74% over the corresponding periods in 2012.
3133



 

The increase in volume experienced in the second quarter of 2013 is primarily related to marketing efforts focused on bringing in new lenders and borrowers.   In January 2013, PMI Group announced bankruptcy remoteness covering all lenders.  In February 2013 there was an equity financing along with a new management team.  Lenders, liquidity and loan originations have increased since these announcements.  InCommencing in the second quarter of 2013, PMI Group increased marketing campaigns to attract new borrowers and introduced the whole loan product, which in turn, has increased loan origination volumes.  The decrease that occurred between Q3Q4 2012 and Q1 2013 was due to lack of liquidity.

 Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Interest Expense on Notes

The PMI Group recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent that they believe it to be collectable.  The PMI Group records interest expense on the corresponding Note based on the contractual interest rate.

The following table summarizes interest income on borrower loans and interest expense on notes for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012.

 Three months ended June 30,  Six months ended June 30, 
 2013  2012  2013  2012  Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
         2013  2012  2013  2012 
Interest Income on Borrower Loans  $8,578   $5,780   $16,309   $10,410  $9,039  $5,027  $25,348  $15,437 
Interest Expense on Notes  (8,128)  (5,499)  (15,453)  (9,902)  (8,435)  (4,716)  (23,888)  (14,618)
Net Interest Income  $450   $281   $856   $508 
Net Interest Income (Expense) on Loans & Notes $604  $311  $1,460  $819 

Increases in interest income on Borrower Loans and interest expense on Notes is driven by the increase in the amount of loans that the PMI Group originated through the platform for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012.

Rebates and Promotions

Rebates and promotions are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition.  From time to time, rebates and promotions are offered to its borrower and lender members.  Rebates and promotions are recorded as an offset to revenue if a particular rebate or promotion was earned directly upon the origination of the loan. Rebates and promotions are generally in the form of cash back and other incentives paid to lenders and borrowers.

34

For the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, the PMI Group incurred expenses related to rebates and promotions extended to borrowers and lenders of $387$471 and $265,$455, respectively, which represented an increase of $122$16 or 46%4%.  For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, the PMI Group incurred expenses related to rebates and promotions extended to borrowers and lenders of $662$1,133 and $549,$1,004, respectively, which represented an increase of $113$129 or 20%13%.

32

Cost of Revenues

Cost of Services

Cost of services consists primarily of credit bureau fees, payments which are due to strategic partners, collection expenses, and other expenses directly related to loan originations, funding and servicing.  Cost of services expenses were $500$508 and $345$375 for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing an increase of 45%35%. Cost of services expenses were $982$1,490 and $681$1,056 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing an increase of 44%41%.  The primary driver for the increase was due to an increase in strategic partnership fees due to the renegotiation of the PMI Group’s contract with WebBank.WebBank and the overall increase in loan volume.

Provision forReversal of (Provision for) Loan Loss

Under the terms of the Notes and Lender Registration Agreements, the PMI Group may, in certain circumstances, become obligated to repurchase a Note from a lender or indemnify a lender against loss on a Note. Generally these circumstances include the occurrence of verifiable identity theft, the failure to properly follow loan listing or bidding protocols, and a violation of the applicable federal/state/local lending laws. The provision for loan loss is evaluated at least once a quarter and represents an estimate based on the rate of historical loan losses as a percentage of originations (which generally occur within six to nine months of origination). The provision for loan loss may include a judgmental management adjustment due to the limited operating history, changes in current economic conditions, the risk of new and as of yet undetected fraud schemes, origination unit and dollar volumes and the lack of industry comparables.  Based on the analysis of the historical provision, the Note recoveries were $58 and the Note provision for loan loss was $50 and $8were $(5) for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The provision for loan loss was $177$(119) and $11$(17) for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Other Income and Expenses

Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans and Notes, net

The total fair value adjustment was $4,082$3,903 and $4,573$4,484 for Borrower Loans and Notes, respectively, resulting in a net unrealized lossgain of $491$578 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013. The total fair value adjustment was $1,060$2,913 and $532$2,063 for Borrower Loans and Notes, respectively, resulting in a net unrealized lossgain of $528$836 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012.  These amounts are included as a component of other income (expense) in the PMI Group’s condensed consolidated statement of operations.

Insurance Recoveries

PMI and certain of its executive officers and directors were the subject of a class action lawsuit brought on behalf of all promissory note purchasers on the platform from January 1, 2006 through October 14, 2008 that alleged that PMI offered and sold unqualified and unregistered securities in violation of the California and federal securities law. During the first quarter of 2011 the Superior Court of California issued a final statement of decision finding that Greenwich Insurance Company, PMI’s insurance carrier with respect to the class action lawsuit, had a duty to defend the suit and requiring that Greenwich pay PMI's past and future defense costs in the suit up to $2,000. During 2011, Greenwich made aggregate payments to PMI in the amount of $2,000 to reimburse PMI for the defense costs it had incurred in the class action suit.  On October 2, 2012, Greenwich made an additional payment of $143 to PMI for pre-judgment interest. Please see Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, in the notes to Prosper Marketplace, Inc.’s condensed consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this quarterly report.

Other Income

Other income consists primarily of credit referral fees, where partner companies pay the PMI Group an agreed upon amount for referrals of customers from the website.  Other income was $271$320 for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 versus $43$145 at JuneSeptember 30, 2012, which represented an increase of 530%121%. Other income was $414$734 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 versus $91$235 at JuneSeptember 30, 2012, which represented an increase of 355%212%.  The increase in credit referrals during these periods was due to the addition of new partners as well as increased traffic to existing credit referral partners.

Operating 35

Expenses

All employees of the PMI Group are employed by PMI. Compensation and benefits expense were $3,270$3,224 and $5,775$8,999 for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013, respectively.  In comparison, compensation and benefits expense were $2,350$2,778 and $4,807$7,584 for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2012, respectively. The increase of $920$446 for the three months and $968$1,415 for the sixnine months was largely due to PMI’s steadily increasing its employee headcount, which in turn resulted in increased payroll costs such as salary and wages, payroll taxes, healthcare, and accrued vacation.related costs. PMI increased its headcount across its marketing and operations during this period in response to increased volume demands. PMI intends to continue to increase headcount as the platform’s lender and borrower bases grow and PMI carries out its business plan; however, PMI expects its ongoing investment in the platform and website to improve operating expense efficiency going forward.  In addition, spending increased related to the use of contract labor, bonus expense, variable pay expense and overtime during 2013 over the corresponding periods in 2012.  During 2013, PMI experienced a decrease in the amount of salaries capitalized related to the development of internal use software which contributed to the overall increase in compensation and benefits.

33

As of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, PMI had 7583 full-time employees compared to 7068 full-time employees as of JuneSeptember 30, 2012.

 June 30, 2013  June 30, 2012 September 30, 2013September 30, 2012
Sales, Marketing and Customer Service 39  31 3836
Engineering 23  25 2719
Administration 13  14 1813
Total Headcount 75  70 8368

Marketing and advertising costs consist primarily of affiliate marketing, search engine marketing, online and offline campaigns, email marketing, public relations, and direct mail marketing.  Marketing and advertising costs were $3,878$4,676 and $1,127$1,578 for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing an increase of 244%196%.  Marketing and advertising costs were $5,451$10,126 and $2,401$3,980 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing an increase of 127%154%.  This increase was largely due to increased efforts with various marketing programs in order to increase borrower volume.  The PMI Group placed an increased emphasis on direct mail marketing campaigns in order to increase its brand awareness and drive borrower volume.  Affiliate marketing expense is deployed through direct partnerships with other websites that send qualified individuals seeking loan options to the platform.  Increased costs associated with search engine marketing are specifically related to increased volume and systematic testing to attract new borrowers through search engines.  Each marketing effort is measured, analyzed and optimized to improve scale and efficiency.  Through optimization of our marketing efforts, we will shift marketing costs to more efficient channels to balance the mix of growth and efficiency in its marketing activities in subsequent quarters.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $208$228 and $168$167 for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing an increase of 24%37% compared to the prior year period.  Depreciation and amortization expense was $413$643 and $326$493 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing an increase of 27%30% compared to the prior year period.  The increase in overall depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to the capitalization of various internally developed software projects placed in service in 2012, which in turn increased depreciation expense taken on those assets during the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.

General and Administrative Expenses
Professional service expenses are comprised of legal expenses, audit and accounting fees, consulting services and other outside costs.  Professional service expenses were $694$399 and $639$863 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and  2012, respectively, representing an increase of 9%.  Professional service expenses were $1,382 and $1,633 for the six months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing a decrease of 15%54%.  This changeProfessional service expenses were $1,781 and $2,496 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and  2012, respectively, representing a decrease of 29%.  The decrease was primarily due to an increasebecause of a decrease in legal fees related to activity in the PMI class action lawsuit and consulting fees.Prosper Funding’s registration statement on Form S-1.

Facilities and maintenance expenses consist primarily of rent paid for the PMI Group’s corporate office lease and data co-location facility, network and power usage costs, software licenses and subscriptions, and hardware and software maintenance and support. Facilities and maintenance expenses were $481$530 and $301$302 for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  This increase of 75% was primarily due to the increases in software licenses and subscriptions, and the increase in rent.  Facilities and maintenance expenses were $794$1,323 and $625$927 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

36

PMI recorded an expense to establish a reserve for class action settlement liability of $10,000 in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.

Other general and administrative expenses consist of bank service charges, NASAA state penalty settlement expenses, travel and entertainment expenses, taxes and licenses costs, communications costs, recruiting costs and other miscellaneous expenses.  Other general and administrative expenses were $499$410 and $381$320 for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing an increase of 31%28%.  Other general and administrative expenses were $825$1,235 and $850$1,170 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing a decreaseincrease of 2.9%6%. This change isThese increases were primarily duerelated to lower recruiting costs offset by higher license costs.the overall incerease in business activity.

34

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table summarizes the cash flow for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively:

 
For the six months ended
June 30,
  
For the six months ended
June 30,
  
For the nine months ended
September 30,
  
For the nine months ended
September 30,
 
 2013  2012  2013  2012 
Net Loss  $(19,852)  $(7,621) $(24,815) $(11,608)
                
Net cash used in operating activities  (11,974)  (8,355)  (17,666)  (11,660)
Net cash used in investing activities  (24,410)  (40,443)  (42,433)  (64,496)
Net cash provided by financing activities  44,599   43,726   87,099   70,974 
                
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  8,215   (5,072)
Net Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  27,000   (5,182)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period  2,300   9,216   2,300   9,216 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period  $10,515   $4,144  $29,300  $4,034 

PMI has incurred operating losses since its inception.  The negative cash flows from operations were $11,974$17,666 and $8,355$11,660 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, the accumulated deficit is approximately $96,751$101,714 as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013.

At JuneSeptember 30, 2013, the PMI Group had approximately $10,515$29,300 in available cash and cash equivalents.  Since its inception, the PMI Group has financed its operations primarily through equity financing from various sources.  The PMI Group is dependent upon raising additional capital or debt financing to fund its current operating plan, however the PMI Group believes that its current cash position is sufficient to meet its current liquidity needs.

Net cash used in operating activities was $11,974$17,666 and $8,355$11,660 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The increase in cash used in operating activities was primarily attributable to the net loss offset by the class action settlement liability.

Net cash used in investing activities was $24,410$42,433 and $40,443$64,496 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  The primary driver for the change is due to increase in borrower loan originations offset by increased repayments of borrower loans held at fair value.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $44,599$87,099 and $43,726$70,974 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.  Net cash provided by financing activities during 2013 consisted of proceeds from the issuance of convertible preferred stock, proceeds from the issuance of Notes and repayments of Notes held at fair value.

In January 2013, PMI issued and sold 138,681,68013,868,152 shares of new Series A preferred stock (“new Series A”) in a private placement at a purchase price of $0.144$1.44 per share for approximately $20,000.$19,844, net of issuance costs.  In connection with that sale, PMI issued 51,171,9515,117,182 shares at par value $0.001$.01 per share of Series A-1 convertible preferred stock to certain previous holders of PMI’s Series A, Series B, Series C, Series D, Series E and Series F preferred stock who participated in the sale. The new Series A securities were sold in reliance on the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act set forth in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act and Regulation D promulgated thereunder regarding sales by an issuer not involving a public offering.

In connection with the new Series A sale, shares of PMI’s preferred stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the sale (“Old Preferred Shares”) were converted into shares of PMI common stock.  For holders of Old Preferred Shares who participated in the sale in proportion to their pro rata ownership interest in PMI, their Old Preferred Shares converted into common shares at a ratio of 1:1.  In addition, each such participating holder received a share of PMI’s new Series A-1 preferred stock for every dollar of liquidation preference associated with an Old Preferred Share held by such holder.  Each share of Series A-1 preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $1.00 and converts into common stock at a ratio of 1,000,000:1.

In September 2013, PMI issued and sold 8,288,784 shares of new Series B preferred stock (“new Series B”) in a private placement at a purchase price of $3.02 per share for approximately $24,880, net of issuance costs.
37

On July 19, 2013, solely to avoid the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation, and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, the parties to the Hellum Litigation pending before the Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco, California, entered into a Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement, and Release (the “Settlement”) setting forth an agreement- to settle all claims related thereto. In connection with the Settlement, PMI agreed to pay the plaintiffs an aggregate amount of $10,000, payable in four annual installmentsaccording to the following schedule: (i) $2,000 within 10 days of entry of an order by the Court granting preliminary approval of the settlement (“Preliminary Approval”); (ii) $2,000 in 2013, $2,000 in 2014,on the one-year anniversary of Preliminary Approval; (iii) $3,000 in 2015on the two-year anniversary of Preliminary Approval; and (iv) $3,000 in 2016.on the three-year anniversary of Preliminary Approval. The settlement is subject to final approval by the Superior Court. Subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the Settlement, the defendants will be released by the plaintiffs from all claims concerning or arising out of the offering of promissory notes on the platform from January 1, 2006 through October 14, 2008. For more information, see Note 10 of Prosper Marketplace, Inc.’s condensed consolidated financial statements located elsewhere in this report.

35

Income Taxes

The PMI Group incurred no income tax provision for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012.  Given the PMI Group’s history of operating losses and inability to achieve profitable operations, it is difficult to accurately forecast how future results will be affected by the realization and use of net operating loss carry forwards.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There are no off-balance sheet arrangements as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013.

Additional Information about the Platform

Comparing Estimated Loss Rates to Actual Losses

Loan performance is reviewed on a monthly basis to determine how loss rate estimates compare to the actual performance of loans.  As part of this monthly review, the processes for calculating and assigning loss rates and Prosper Ratings described in the preceding sections are reassessed to ensure continued accuracy.  The graphs below show the estimated versus actual cumulative dollar loss rates by Prosper Rating for Borrower Loans booked from July 13, 2009 through June 30, March 31, 2013.  Performance is as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013.  Because it generally takes at least 120 days for a delinquent loan to become charged off, cumulative loss curves are only shown for vintages with at least 6 months of performance information available as of September 30, 2013.  The loss performance is tracked by vintage and factors in aging. Accordingly, eachEach line represents all loans originated in a given period that have been outstanding at least 126 months.  In addition, data for a point along the x axis is only included if the entire vintage is at least that mature.

Vintages generally contain enough loan volume for their performance curves to be meaningful.  In order to increase the significanceMore recent vintages are displayed with a greater degree of the curves presented,granularity.  Borrower Loans originated from July 13,in 2009 through December 31, 2010 have been2011 are aggregated into annual vintages.  Borrower Loans originated in 20112012 and 2013 are aggregated into half-yeargrouped by half year or quarterly vintages.  Only the first two quarters of 2012 originations are mature enough to be shown.

The graphs below show cumulative net charge-offs for Borrower Loans as a percentage of originations for each Prosper Rating presentedRating.  Loans are grouped by origination vintage from July 13, 2009 to June 30, 2012 asand rating and are compared to the estimates provideda hypothetical estimate of principal loss that is expected to investors at the time the loans were originated.  The estimates do not represent updated loss forecastsbe associated with each rating grade. .  This information is provided as a helpful way of comparing actual losses with such estimates, but it is only one of many important factors to consider in evaluating the suitability of Notes as investments.  Other important factors to consider include, but are not limited to, early loan prepayment, severity and timing of the charge-off, and recovery and timing of payment post default. 

The PMI Group’s participation in funding loans on the platform from time to time has had, and will continue to have, no effect on the income and employment verification process, the selection of loan requests verified or the frequency of income and employment verification.

The graphs below show cumulative net charge-offs for Borrower Loans as a percentage of originations for each Prosper Rating presented by origination vintage from July 13, 2009 to June 30, 2012.
36


37


March 31, 2013.
38


39


40



41


Note: Estimated lines representline reflects the high end of theweighted average estimated loss rate range for each Prosper Rating, except for HR, whereacross all vintages at the high endtime of the range is 100% and the estimated curve was set at 24.75% cumulative principal loss.origination.

In aggregate,For vintages originated in 2011 early 2012, the 2011 through 2012H1 vintagesmajority of high risk loans (C-HR) are on track for higher cumulative losses than those experienced for the 2009H22009 and 2010 vintages.  The increase in losses is explained both due to the riskier customer mix in 2011 and 2012 as well as worse than estimated performance in the riskier (C-HR) rating grades.  The 2012Q4 and 2013Q1 vintages are performing at or better than expected across nearly all rating grades.  The vastly improved loss performance of the 2012Q4 and 2013Q1 vintages is a direct result of improvements made to collection and underwriting strategy at the time these vintages were originated.

In instances where a material variance relative to estimates exists, analysis is conducted to understand the reason for the variance and the credit policy isand credit operations are adjusted to bring loan losses back in-line with estimates.  For instance, manyThe worse than expected performance of the higher risk (C-HR) applicants fromC-HR rating grades through 2011 and early 2012 would currently either be givenis a worse rating or would not be allowedcase in point.  Once the variance was identified, underwriting and collection policies were modified to post a listing were they to apply for a loan today underbring future originations (2012Q4 and 2013Q1) back within the current credit policy.expected range.

Please noteNote that the historical performance of Borrower Loans may not be indicative of the future performance of Borrower Loans.  See “Item 1A. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Prosper Funding and PMI, the Platform and Prosper Funding and PMI’s Ability to Service the Notes” in the PMI Group’s Form 10-K filed on March 19, 2013 for more information.

Loan Originations

The tables below show loan volume, origination amount, average Experian ScorexPlus credit scores and other pertinent data by Prosper Rating for originations from July 13, 2009 to JuneSeptember 30, 2013:

Prosper Rating Number Amount Weighted Average Borrower Rate Weighted Average Estimated Loss Weighted Average Lender Yield Average Experian ScorexPlus Score Weighted Average Borrower APR  Number  Amount  
Weighted –
Average
Borrower Rate
  
Weighted –
Average
Estimated Loss
  
Weighted –
Average Lender
Yield
  
Average Experian
ScorexPlus Score
  
Weighted –
Average
Borrower APR
 
AA 3,126 $33,039 8.66% 1.45% 7.66% 797 9.72%   3,527  $37,929   8.56%  1.47%  7.56%  796   9.66%
A 7,458 $74,938 11.83% 3.00% 10.83% 752 14.26%  9,162   97,246   11.80%  3.08%  10.80%  752   14.27%
B 7,546 $74,136 16.57% 5.34% 15.57% 723 19.31%  9,713   101,843   16.32%  5.28%  15.32%  724   19.09%
C 8,408 $73,828 21.05% 7.69% 20.05% 707 24.19%  10,614   98,246   20.70%  7.65%  19.70%  705   23.80%
D 10,029 $66,702 25.59% 10.64% 24.59% 693 28.96%  11,395   76,742   25.38%  10.62%  24.38%  692   28.73%
E 6,433 $26,973 30.45% 14.11% 29.45% 673 34.22%  7,471   31,496   30.09%  14.01%  29.09%  673   33.82%
HR 6,182 $21,243 31.85% 17.46% 30.85% 689 35.67%   6,443   22,192   31.82%  17.39%  30.82%  688   35.65%
Total 49,182 $370,859 19.31% 7.27% 18.31% 712 22.16%   58,325  $465,694   18.83%  7.06%  17.83%  713   21.68%

4042

The tables below show loan volume, origination amount, average Experian ScorexPlus credit scores and other pertinent data by Prosper Rating for originations from AprilJuly 1, 2013 to JuneSeptember 30, 2013:

Prosper Rating Number Amount Weighted Average Borrower Rate Weighted Average Estimated Loss Weighted Average Lender Yield Average Experian ScorexPlus Score Weighted Average Borrower APR    Number  Amount  
Weighted –
Average
Borrower Rate
  
Weighted –
Average
Estimated Loss
  
Weighted –
Average Lender
Yield
  
Average Experian
ScorexPlus Score
  
Weighted –
Average
Borrower APR
 
AA 341 $4,134 7.85% 1.63% 6.85% 787 9.33%   401  $4,890   7.85%  1.63%  6.85%  789   9.26%
A 1,229 $16,033 11.65% 3.29% 10.65% 752 14.16%  1,704   22,307   11.73%  3.33%  10.73%  751   14.28%
B 1,585 $20,377 15.91% 5.15% 14.91% 733 18.70%  2,167   27,707   15.65%  5.10%  14.65%  727   18.48%
C 1,764 $19,684 20.20% 7.47% 19.20% 706 23.23%  2,206   24,418   19.64%  7.53%  18.64%  699   22.64%
D 1,160 $8,751 24.46% 10.44% 23.46% 688 27.74%  1,366   10,039   23.99%  10.45%  22.99%  687   27.23%
E 851 $3,187 28.25% 13.25% 27.25% 678 31.78%  1,038   4,523   27.93%  13.41%  26.93%  672   31.47%
HR 169 $611 31.33% 15.74% 30.33% 696 35.35%   261   950   31.09%  15.85%  30.09%  673   35.10%
Total 7,099 $72,777 17.37% 6.25% 16.37% 717 20.19%   9,143  $94,834   16.97%  6.20%  15.97%  714   19.80%

4143

PROSPER FUNDING LLC

Overview

Prosper Funding LLC (“Prosper Funding”) was formed in the state of Delaware in February 2012 as a limited liability company with its sole equity member being PMI. Prosper Funding was formed by PMI to hold borrower loans and issue borrower payment dependent notes through the platform.  Although Prosper Funding is consolidated with PMI for accounting and tax purposes, Prosper Funding has been organized and is operated in a manner that is intended to minimize the likelihood that it would be substantively consolidated with PMI in a bankruptcy proceeding.  Prosper Funding’s intention is to minimize the likelihood that its assets would be subject to claims by PMI’s creditors if PMI were to file for bankruptcy, as well as to minimize the likelihood that Prosper Funding will become subject to bankruptcy proceedings directly.  Prosper Funding seeks to achieve this by placing certain restrictions on its activities and implementing certain formal procedures designed to expressly reinforce its status as a distinct corporate entity from PMI.

On January 22, 2013, PMI entered into an Asset Transfer Agreement with Prosper Funding (the “Asset Transfer Agreement”), pursuant to which PMI transferred substantially all of its remaining assets to Prosper Funding, including (i) all outstanding notes issued by PMI under the Indenture dated June 15, 2009 between PMI and Wells Fargo Bank, as trustee, (ii) all borrower loans held by PMI, (iii) all lender/borrower/group leader registration agreements related to the notes or the borrower loans, and (iv) all documents and information related to the foregoing, effective February 1, 2013.

On February 1, 2013, PMI made a capital contribution in excess of $3,000 to Prosper Funding and Prosper Funding commenced operations. Since February 1, 2013, all notes are issued, sold and serviced through the platform by Prosper Funding (together with the notes transferred from PMI, the “Notes”).  Pursuant to an Administration Agreement between Prosper Funding and PMI, PMI manages all other aspects of the platform on behalf of Prosper Funding.

All loans requested and obtained through the platform are unsecured obligations of individual borrower members with a fixed interest rate and loan terms set at three or five years as of June September 30, 2013. All loans made through the platform are funded by WebBank, an FDIC-insured, Utah chartered industrial bank.  After funding a loan, WebBank sells the loan to Prosper Funding, without recourse to WebBank, in exchange for the principal amount of the loan (together with the borrower loans transferred from PMI, the “Borrower Loans”).  WebBank does not have any obligation to purchasers of the Notes.

Prosper Funding entered into an Administration Agreement with PMI pursuant to which PMI has agreed to provide certain administrative services relating to the platform.  The Administration Agreement contains a license granted by Prosper Funding to PMI that entitles PMI to use the platform for and in relation to: (i) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement relating to corporate administration, loan platform services, loan and note servicing and marketing, and (ii) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations to WebBank in relation to loan origination and funding.  The license is terminable in whole or in part in relation to failure by PMI to pay the licensing fee or the termination of PMI as the provider of some or all of the aforementioned services.

Trends and Uncertainties

The performance of current and futureProsper Funding Borrower Loans may not be consistent with the historical trends demonstrated by prior PMI Borrower Loans.  During 2013, Prosper Funding increased its origination volume consistently in terms of both units and total dollar amounts and hopes to continue that trend of growth into the future.  Over time, Prosper Funding expects its lender base to grow as it gains more exposure to potential borrowers and lenders and establishes its Notes as a viable investment alternative.  Prosper Funding expects the growth of its lender base will contribute to increased origination volume.

Prosper Funding’s operating plan calls for a strategy of increasing transaction volume, borrower focused marketing and improving the efficiency of the platform to increase revenue.  Prosper Funding will generate revenue through license fees earned under the Administration Agreement and servicing fees from lender members which are described more fully in the Prosper Funding LLC Notes to Condensed Financial Statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report.

The peer-to-peer lending industry remains a very innovative and unique industry.  The application of federal and state laws in areas such as securities and consumer finance to Prosper Funding’s business is still evolving. Prosper Funding will continue to monitor this evolution actively in order to identify and respond quickly to any legislative or regulatory developments that may impact the platform.
4244

Fair Value Measurement

Upon commencement of operations on February 1, 2013, Prosper Funding began to purchase Borrower Loans originated through the platform and issue Notes, which are accounted for on a fair value basis.

Prosper Funding determines the fair values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which requires an entity to maximize the use of quoted prices and observable inputs and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Prosper Funding uses various valuation techniques depending on the nature of the financial instrument, including the use of market prices for identical or similar instruments, or discounted cash flow models.  When possible, active and observable market data for identical or similar financial instruments are utilized. Alternatively, Prosper Funding may determine fair value using assumptions that it believes a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The estimated fair values of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature.  Short term investments, Borrower Loans held for investment, Borrower Loans, and Notes are accounted for on a fair value basis. For additional information and discussion regarding significant accounting policies surrounding fair value measurement, see Note 2, Note 3 and Note 4 to Prosper Funding’sMarketplace, Inc.’s condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report.

Borrower Loans and Notes

Prosper Funding purchases Borrower Loans from WebBank and, if issuing Notes to lender members to fund its purchase of Borrower Loans, holds the Borrower Loans until maturity, except as may otherwise be determined in connection with the servicing of any Borrower Loan.   The obligation to repay the Notes is conditioned upon the repayment of the associated Borrower Loan owned by Prosper Funding.  Prosper Funding carries the Borrower Loans and Notes on its balance sheet as assets and liabilities, respectively.  Prosper Funding also purchases Borrower Loans from WebBank and immediately sells them to certain qualified lender members.

Prosper Funding has adopted the provisions of ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments.  ASC Topic 825 permits companies to choose to measure certain financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  The standard requires that unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected be reported in earnings.  Prosper Funding applies the provisions of ASC Topic 825 to the Borrower Loans and Notes issued on an instrument by instrument basis.  The aggregate fair value of the Borrower Loans and Notes are reported as separate line items in the assets and liabilities sections of the balance sheet using the methods described in ASC Topic 820.

Prosper Funding determines the fair value of the Borrower Loans and Notes in accordance with the fair value hierarchy established in ASC Topic 820, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.  As observable market prices are not available for the Borrower Loans and Notes Prosper Funding holds or for similar assets and liabilities, Prosper Funding believes that the Borrower Loans and Notes should be considered Level 3 financial instruments under ASC Topic 820.  ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.

In a hypothetical transaction as of the measurement date, Prosper Funding believes that differences in the principal marketplace in which the Borrower Loans are originated and the principal marketplace in which it might offer those Borrower Loans may result in differences between the originated amount of the Borrower Loans and their fair value as of the transaction date. Changes in the fair value of Borrower Loans and Notes subject to the provisions of ASC Topic 820 are recognized in earnings; fees and costs associated with the acquisition of Borrower Loans are recognized as incurred.  Prosper Funding estimates the fair value of the Borrower Loans and Notes using a discounted cash flow methodology based upon a set of valuation assumptions it believes market participants would use for similar assets and liabilities. The main assumptions used to value the Borrower Loans and Notes include default rates, discount rates applied to each credit tranche/grade, prepayment rates, and recovery rates based upon historical data for Borrower Loans and Notes originated in prior periods.

Overall, if the fair value of the Borrower Loans decrease or increase due to any changes in Prosper Funding’s assumptions, there will also be a corresponding decrease or increase in the fair value of the linked Notes. As a result, the effect on Prosper Funding’s earnings of adverse changes in key assumptions is mitigated. However, the impact of these changes in fair value could have a material adverse impact on lender members’ investments in the Notes.
4345

As Prosper Funding receives scheduled payments of principal and interest on the Borrower Loans it in turn makes principal and interest payments on the Notes.  These principal payments reduce the carrying value of the Borrower Loans and Notes.  If Prosper Funding does not receive payments on the Borrower Loans, it is not obligated to and will not make payments on the Notes.  The fair value of a Note is approximately equal to the fair value of the corresponding Borrower Loan, less a servicing fee charged to Note holders.  If the fair value of the Borrower Loan decreases due to Prosper Funding’s expectation regarding both the likelihood of default of the loan and the amount of loss in the event of default, there will also be a corresponding decrease in the fair value of the Note (an unrealized gain related to the Note and an unrealized loss related to the Borrower Loan).

Overall, if the fair value of the Borrower Loans decrease or increase due to any changes in the PMI Group’s assumptions, there will also be a corresponding decrease or increase in the fair value of the linked Notes. As a result, the effect on the PMI Group’s earnings of adverse changes in key assumptions is mitigated.

As the PMI Group receives scheduled payments of principal and interest on the Borrower Loans it in turn makes principal and interest payments on the Notes. These principal payments reduce the carrying value of the Borrower Loans and Notes. If the PMI Group does not receive payments on the Borrower Loans, the PMI Group is not obligated to and does not make payments on the Notes. The fair value of a Note is approximately equal to the fair value of the corresponding Borrower Loan, less the service fee. If the fair value of the Borrower Loan decreases due to the PMI Group’s expectation regarding both the likelihood of default of the loan and the amount of loss in the event of default, there is also a corresponding decrease in the fair value of the Note (an unrealized gain related to the Note and an unrealized loss related to the Borrower Loan).

Key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair value to immediate adverse changes in those assumptions at JuneSeptember 30, 2013 for Borrower Loans and Notes are presented in the following table:

 Borrower Loans  Notes  Borrower Loans  Notes 
Discount rate assumption:  10.50%  10.50%  10.00%  10.00%
Decrease in fair value and income (loss) to earnings from:                
100 basis point increase  $186,043   $183,829  $202,015  $199,663 
200 basis point increase  183,991   181,796   199,623   197,271 
Increase in fair value and income (loss) to earnings from:                
100 basis point decrease  $190,309   $188,056  $206,953  $204,550 
200 basis point decrease  192,528   190,254   209,509   207,074 
                
        
Default rate assumption:                
Decrease in fair value and income (loss) to earnings from:                
10% higher default rates  $186,061   $183,850  $202,295  $199,926 
20% higher default rates  183,733   181,546   199,450   197,127 
Increase in fair value and income (loss) to earnings from:                
10% lower default rates  $190,172   $187,917  $206,651  $204,234 
20% lower default rates  192,184   189,908   208,796   206,364 

For additional information and discussion, see Note 2 and Note 3 to Prosper Funding’s condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Results of Operations

Revenues

Revenue Recognition

Prosper Funding’s revenue recognition policy is in accordance with ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. Under ASC Topic 605, revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the price of the services is fixed and determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.

44

Administration Fee Revenue - Related Party

Prosper Funding primarily generates revenues through license fees it earns through an Administration Agreement with PMI.  The Administration Agreement contains a license granted by Prosper Funding to PMI that entitles PMI to use the platform for and in relation to: (i) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations under the Administration Agreement relating to corporate administration, loan platform services, loan and note servicing and marketing, and (ii) PMI’s performance of its duties and obligations to WebBank in relation to loan origination and funding.  For the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013, Prosper Funding received $1,528$2,042 in administration fee revenue from PMI.  For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013, Prosper Funding received $2,135$4,178 in administration fee revenue from PMI.

46

Loan Servicing Fees

Loan servicing revenue includes monthly loan servicing fees and non-sufficient funds (“NSF”) fees on Borrower Loans.  Loan servicing fees are accrued daily based on the current outstanding loan principal balance of the Borrower Loan but are not recognized until payment is received due to the uncertainty of collection of Borrower Loan payments.  Prosper Funding’s servicing fee is currently equal to 1.0% of the outstanding principal balance of the corresponding Borrower Loan.

Interest Income on Borrower Loans and Interest Expense on Notes

Prosper Funding recognizes interest income on Borrower Loans using the accrual method based on the stated interest rate to the extent that Prosper Funding believes it to be collectable.  Prosper Funding records interest expense on the corresponding Note based on the contractual interest rate.

 
Three months
ended June 30,
  
Six months
ended June 30,
  
From February
17, 2012 (date
of inception) to
June 30,
  
 
 
Three months
ended September 30,
  
 
Nine months
ended
September 30,
  
From February
17, 2012 (date of
inception) to
September 30,
 
 2013  2012  2013  2012  2013  2012  2013  2012 
Interest Income on Borrower Loans $8,578  $-  $13,651  $-  $9,039  $-  $22,687  $- 
Interest Expense on Notes  (8,128)  -   (12,946)  -   (8,435) -   (21,380) - 
Net Interest Income (Expense) on Loans & Notes  $450   $-   $705   $-  $604  $-  $1,307  $- 

The overall increase in net interest income for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 was driven by the rise in the amount of Borrower Loans that Prosper Funding owned and serviced at any given point.

Cost of Revenues

Cost of Services

Prosper Funding also incurs certain recurring expenses relating to fees under the Administration Agreement with PMI, as well as its agreements with WebBank, Wells Fargo, FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. and CSC Logic, Inc.  In addition, Prosper Funding incurs certain ongoing expenses related to collateral requirements under its agreements with WebBank and Wells Fargo Bank. During the three month period ending JuneSeptember 30, 2013, Prosper Funding incurred $338$357 in cost of services. During the period from commencement of operations on February 1, 2013 through JuneSeptember 30, 2013, Prosper Funding incurred $563$920 in cost of services.

Provision forReversal of (Provision for) Loan Loss

Under the terms of the Notes and Lender Registration Agreements, the PMI GroupProsper Funding may, in certain circumstances, become obligated to repurchase a Note from a lender or indemnify a lender against loss on a Note. Generally these circumstances include the occurrence of verifiable identity theft, the failure to properly follow loan listing or bidding protocols, and a violation of the applicable federal/state/local lending laws. The provision for loan loss is evaluated at least once a quarter and represents an estimate based on the rate of historical loan losses as a percentage of originations (which generally occur within six to nine months of origination). The provision for loan loss may include a judgmental management adjustment due to the limited operating history, changes in current economic conditions, the risk of new and as of yet undetected fraud schemes, origination unit and dollar volumes and the lack of industry comparables.  Based on the analysis of the historical provision, the provision for loan loss was $50recoveries were $66 for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.  The provision for loan loss was $149($83) for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.

45

Other Income and Expenses

Change in Fair Value of Borrower Loans and Notes, net

The total fair value adjustment was $4,082$3,903 and $4,573$4,484 for Borrower Loans and Notes, respectively, resulting in a net unrealized gain of $491$578 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.  The amounts are included as a component of other income (expense) in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.  Since Prosper Funding did not commence operations until 2013, there were no fair value adjustments in 2012.

47

Operating Expenses

Administration Fee Expense - Related Party

Pursuant to an Administration Agreement between Prosper Funding and PMI, PMI manages the platform on behalf of Prosper Funding. Accordingly, each month, Prosper Funding is required to pay PMI certain corporate administration(a) an amount equal to one-twelfth (1/12) of the specified annual Corporate Administration Fees of $865, (b) a fee for each Borrower Loan funded, (c) 90% of all servicing fees collected by or on behalf of Prosper Funding, and other variable(d) all nonsufficient funds fees basedcollected by or on funding volume and servicing activities.behalf of Prosper Funding.

Professional Services

Professional service expenses are comprised of legal expenses, audit and accounting fees, consulting services and other outside costs.  Professional service expenses were $5$6 and $17$8 for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing a decrease of $12.$2.  Professional service expenses were $20$26 and $82$90 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing a decrease of $62.$64.  The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the legal fees related to the formation of Prosper Funding diminished.Funding.

Other Operating Expense

Other expenses consist primarily of bank service charges.  Other expenses were $50$62 and zero$19 for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing an increase of $50.$43. Other expenses were $94$157 and $59$78 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing an increase of $35.$79. This increase is primarily due to bank service charges.

Prosper Funding incurs certain fees relating to registering or qualifying its offering and sale of Notes with federal and state securities regulators, as well as additional fees relating to obtaining other licenses and permits that are necessary to the operation of its business.  In addition, Prosper Funding incurs certain ongoing expenses related to collateral requirements under its agreements with WebBank and Wells Fargo Bank.

Prosper Funding also incurs certain recurring expenses relating to fees under the Administration Agreement with PMI, as well as its agreements with WebBank, Wells Fargo, FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. and CSC Logic, Inc.  Prosper Funding will also incur additional expense to the extent it is required to repurchase any Notes or indemnify Note holders in regard to any Notes.  It will pay these recurring expenses from license fees and servicing fees that it earns in connection with the license contained in the Administration Agreement and the servicing of Borrower Loans and Notes.  Prosper Funding expects that the combination of the initial capital contributions described above and ongoing fee revenue will be sufficient for it to meet ongoing cash requirements and sustain its operations.

Income Taxes

Prosper Funding incurred no income tax provision for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.  Prosper Funding is a US disregarded entity and the income and loss is included in the return of its parent, PMI. Given PMI’s history of operating losses and inability to achieve profitable operations, it is difficult to accurately forecast how PMI and Prosper Funding’s results will be affected by the realization and use of net operating loss carry forwards.

46

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table summarizes the cash flow for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively:

     
For the nine months
ended September 30,
  
From February
17, 2012 (date of
inception) to
September 30,
 
 For the six months ended June 30, 2013  From February 17, 2012 (date of inception) to June 30, 2012  2013  2012 
Net Loss  $1,267   $(141)
Net Income (Loss) $1,915  $(168)
              
Net cash provided by operating activities  1,494   (141)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 1,794  (168)
Net cash used in investing activities  (21,352)  -  (38,882) - 
Net cash provided by financing activities  23,363   146   40,250   173 
              
Net Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  3,505   5 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents $3,162  $5 
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period  5   -   5   - 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period  $3,510  $5  $3,167  $5 

48

Prosper Funding has positive cash flowflows since commencement of operations and anticipates that it will continue to be cash flow positive through the end of 2013.  Prosper Funding has positive cash flows from operations of $1,494$1,794 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013. At JuneSeptember 30, 2013, Prosper Funding had $3,510$3,167 in available cash and cash equivalents.  Since its inception, Prosper Funding has financed its operations primarily through capital infusions from its parent, PMI.  Prosper Funding believes that its current cash position is sufficient to meet its current liquidity needs.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,494$1,794 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.  The cash provided by operating activities was primarily attributable to license fees Prosper Funding received offset by fees incurred related to certain recurring expenses under the Administration Agreement with PMI, as well as its agreements with WebBank, Wells Fargo, FOLIOfn Investments, Inc. and CSC Logic, Inc.  Prosper Funding will also incur additional expense to the extent it is required to repurchase any Notes or indemnify Note holders in regard to any Notes.

Net cash used in investing activities was $21,352$38,882 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.  Net cash provided by investing activities primarily consisted of repayments of Borrower Loans held at fair value and Borrower Loan originations at fair value.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $23,363$40,250 for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.  Net cash provided by financing activities mainly consisted of capital infusions contributed by PMI, proceeds from issuance of Notes and payments of Notes.

Item 3.  Quantitative
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable for smaller reporting companies.

Item 4.
Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Each Registrant maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in such Registrant’s Exchange Act Reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the management of such Registrant, including such Registrant’s principal executive officer (“PEO”) and principal financial officer (“PFO”), as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.  Such Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were designed to provide reasonable assurance of achieving their stated objectives.  Under the supervision, and with the participation, of management, including the PEO and the PFO, each Registrant has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of JuneSeptember 30, 2013, following the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control—Integrated Framework, and with further guidance for internal controls for small business provided by the SEC’s Interpretive Guidance in Release No. 34-55929.  Based upon this evaluation, the PEO and the PFO of such Registrant have concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to such Registrant and its subsidiaries that is required to be disclosed in reports filed with, or submitted to, the SEC under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to management, including its PEO and PFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

47

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the PEO and PFO of each Registrant, each such Registrant has evaluated changes in internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during each Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter, and has concluded there was no change in such Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, such Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act exempts any company that is not a “large accelerated filer” or an “accelerated filer” (as defined by SEC rules) from the requirement that such company obtain an external audit of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. As a result, each of the Registrants is exempt from the requirement that it include in its Annual Report on Form 10-K an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting by an independent registered public accounting firm; however, management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting, pursuant to Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, is still required with respect to each Registrant.

4849

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.
Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

See Note 10: “ Commitments and Contingencies” of PMI’s Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Part I, Item 1 of this report for information regarding

·PMI’s NASAA settlement agreement,
·Litigation between PMI and its insurer, and
·Class action litigation involving PMI.

This information is incorporated into this Item by reference.

Because of the nature and inherent uncertainties of litigation, should the outcome of any legal actions be unfavorable, the PMI Group may be required to pay damages and other expenses, which could have a material adverse effect on the PMI Group’s consolidated financial position and results of operations. The PMI Group is not currently subject to any material legal proceedings other than the matters referenced above. Except for those matters, the PMI Group is not aware of any litigation matters that have had, or are expected to have, a material adverse effect on the PMI Group.

This Item should be read in conjunction with the Legal Proceedings disclosures in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (Part I, Item 3).

Item 1A.
Item 1A.  Risk Factors

Not applicable for smaller reporting companies.

Item 2.
Unregistered Sale"Sale" of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On January 15, 2013, PMI entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with certain new investors and certain of its existing investors (each, a “Share“Series A Share Purchaser” and, collectively, the “Share“Series A Share Purchasers”), pursuant to which, PMI issued and sold to such Series A Share Purchasers (either directly or through certain of their respective affiliates) 138,681,68013,868,152 shares of PMI’s new Series A preferred stock (the “Shares”“Series A Shares”) for an aggregate purchase price of $20,000.$19,844, net of issuance costs. In connection with that sale, PMI also issued 51,171,9515,117,182 shares at the par value $0.001$0.01 per share of Series A-1 convertible preferred stock to certain previous holders of PMI’s preferred stock who participated in the sale. The Series A-1 shares established certain liquidation rights, have no voting rights and are convertible into one share of PMI common stock for every one million shares of Series A-1 preferred stock. PMI allocated the fair value of the shares of Series A-1 preferred stock at the par value of $.001$0.01 per share from the proceeds of Series A preferred stock. Upon issuance of PMI Series A and Series A-1 preferred stock, all of PMI’s preferred stock existing prior to such issuance was converted into PMI common stock at a 1:1 ratio if the holder of the preferred stock participated in the new Series A preferred stock sale or at a 10:1 ratio if the holder of the existing preferred stock did not so participate.

On September 23, 2013, PMI entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with certain new investors and certain of its existing investors (each, a “Series B Share Purchaser” and, collectively, the “Series B Share Purchasers”), pursuant to which, PMI issued and sold to such Series B Share Purchasers (either directly or through certain of their respective affiliates) 8,288,734 shares of PMI’s new Series B preferred stock (the “Series B Shares”) for an aggregate purchase price of $24,880, net of issuance costs.

INFORMATION FOR THIS ITEM IS NOT REQUIRED FOR PROSPER FUNDING BECAUSE IT MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERATION INSTRUCTION H(1)(a) AND (b) OF FORM 10-Q AND THEREFORE IS FILING THIS FORM WITH A REDUCED FILING FORMAT.

Item 3.Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5.Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6.Exhibits

The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed or incorporated by reference as a part of this report and such Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.
4950

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 PROSPER MARKETPLACE, INC.
 PROSPER FUNDING LLC
Date: August 14,November xx, 2013/s/ Stephan Vermut
 Stephan Vermut
 
Chief Executive Officer of Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Chief Executive Officer of Prosper Funding LLC
 
(principal executive officer)
 
Date: August 14,November xx, 2013/s/ Kenneth L. NiewaldJoshua P. Hachadourian
 Kenneth L. NiewaldJoshua P. Hachadourian
 
Chief
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Prosper Marketplace, Inc.
Treasurer
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Prosper Funding LLC
(principal financial and accounting officer)

5051

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
Number
 
Exhibit Description
NumberExhibit Description
 
3.1
ThirdFifth Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Prosper Funding, dated June 4,October 21, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Current ReportPost-Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form 8-K,S-1, filed June 5,October 23, 2013 by Prosper Funding and PMI)
 
 
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PMI(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed August 1, 2013 by and PMI)PMI
 
 
3.3
Prosper Funding Certificate of Formation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, filed April 23, 2012 by Prosper Funding and PMI)
 
 
3.4
Bylaws of PMI, dated March 22, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed October 30, 2007 by PMI)
4.1First Supplemental Indenture, dated May 10, 2013, between Prosper Funding LLC and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
 
 
10.1
Form of Prosper Funding Borrower Registration Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Post-Effective Amendment No. 23 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed April 24,October 23, 2013 by Prosper Funding and PMI)
 
 
10.2
Form of Prosper Funding Lender Registration Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed April 24, 2013 by Prosper Funding and PMI)
 
 
10.3
Amended and Restated Services Indemnity Agreement, between Prosper Funding LLC, Prosper Marketplace, Inc., Global Securitization Services, LLC, Bernard J. Angelo and David V. DeAngelis, dated May 30, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 5, 2013 by Prosper Funding and PMI)
 
 
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to PMI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.
 
 
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to PMI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.
 
 
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to Prosper Funding’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.
 
 
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to Prosper Funding’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.
 
 
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to PMI’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.
 
 
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, with respect to Prosper Funding’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2013.
 
 
101.INS
XBRL Instance Documents
 
 
101.SCH
XBRL  Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
 
 
101.CAL
Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
 
 
101.LAB
Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
 
 
101.PRE
Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
 
 
101.DEF
Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 
5152