As a matter of policy, the Company does not provide forecasts of future financial performance. The statements made in this Form 10-Q Quarterly Report which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such forward-looking statements often contain or are prefaced by words such as “believe”, “will” and “expect.” These statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our business based, in part, on assumptions made by management. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. As a result of a number of factors, our actual results could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. Certain factors that might cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, without limitation, general business conditions, the demand for the Company’s services, competitive market pressures, the ability of the Company to attract and retain qualified personnel for regular full-time placement and contract assignments, the possibility of incurring liability for the Company’s business activities, including the activities of its contract employees and events affecting its contract employees on client premises, and the ability to attract and retain qualified corporate and branch management, as well as those risks discussed in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2012,2013, and in other documents which we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made, and the Company is under no obligation to (and expressly disclaims any such obligation to) and does not intend to update or alter its forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

General Employment Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “our” or “us”) provides staffing services through a network of branch offices located in major metropolitan areas throughout the United States. The Company’s professional staffing services provide information technology, engineering and accounting professionals to clients on either a regular placement basis or a temporary contract basis. The Company’s agricultural staffing services provided agricultural workers for farms and groves, until July 7, 2013, when the Company ceased operations within its agricultural division,Agricultural Division, terminated all the division’s employees and began the process of liquidating all assets of this division.  The Company’s industrial staffing business provides weekly temporary staffing for light industrial clients in Ohio and Pennsylvania.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended June 30,December 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending September 30, 2013.2014. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2012.2013.

In recent years, the Company has incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations. Management has implemented a strategy which included cost reduction efforts as well as identifying strategic acquisitions to be financed primarily through the issuance of common stock, and to improve the overall profitability and cash flows of the Company. The Company entered into a three year revolving credit agreement with Keltic Financial Partners II, LLP (“Keltic”) to provide working capital financing. Management believes with currentfuture cash flow from operations and the availability under the ARKeltic Credit Facility, the Company will have sufficient liquidity for the next 12 months.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts and transactions of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Management makes estimates and assumptions that can affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported as of the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements, as well as the amounts of reported revenues and expenses during the periods presented. Those estimates and assumptions typically involve expectations about events to occur subsequent to the balance sheet date, and it is possible that actual results could ultimately differ from the estimates. If differences were to occur in a subsequent period, the Company would recognize those differences when they became known. Significant matters requiring the use of estimates and assumptions include, but may not be limited to, deferred income tax valuation allowances, accounts receivable allowances, accounting for acquisitions and evaluation of impairment. Management believes that its estimates and assumptions are reasonable, based on information that is available at the time they are made.

Direct hire placement service revenues are recognized when applicants accept offers of employment, less a provision for estimated losses due to applicants not remaining employed for the Company’s guarantee period. Contract staffing service revenues are recognized when services are rendered.

The cost of contract services includes the wages and the related payroll taxes and employee benefits of the Company’s employees while they work on contract assignments.

We record a provision for income taxes for the anticipated tax consequences of the reported results of operations using the asset and liability method. Under this method, we recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities, as well as for operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using the tax rates that are expected to apply to taxable income for the years in which those tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the net amount that we believe is more likely than not to be realized.

Due to the private sale of shares of common stock to LEED HR during fiscal 2012 and the resulting change in control, the Company may be limited by Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code as to the amount of net operating losses that may be used in future years.

We recognize tax benefits from uncertain tax positions only if we believe that it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. Although we believe that we have adequately reserved for our uncertain tax positions, we can provide no assurance that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be materially different. We make adjustments to these reserves when facts and circumstances change, such as the closing of a tax audit or the refinement of an estimate. To the extent that the final tax outcome of these matters is different than the amounts recorded, such differences will affect the provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made and could have a material impact on our financial condition and operating results.

Highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents. At June 30,December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2012,2013, there were no cash equivalents. The Company maintains deposits in financial institutions in excess of amounts guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions and, at times, balances may exceed federally insured limits. We have never experienced any losses related to these balances. All of our non-interest bearing cash balances were fully insured at December 31, 2012 due to a temporary federal program in effect from December 31, 2010 through December 31, 2012. Under the program, there was no limit to the amount of insurance for eligible accounts. Beginning 2013, insurance coverage reverted to $250,000 per depositor at each financial institution, and our non-interest bearing cash balances may again exceed federally insured limits.

Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation expense is calculated on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives of five years for computer equipment and two to ten years for office equipment, furniture and fixtures. The Company capitalizes computer software purchased or developed for internal use and amortizes it over an estimated useful life of five years. The carrying value of property and equipment is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that it may not be recoverable. If the carrying amount of an asset group is greater than its estimated future undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value is written down to the estimated fair value. There was no impairment of property and equipment for the ninethree month periods ended June 30,December 31, 2013 and 2012. For property and equipment included in current assetassets of discontinued operations in the accompanying balance sheet, the Company has ceased recording depreciation expense.

Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets acquired in the acquisition of DMCC Staffing, LLC (“DMCC”) and RFFG of Cleveland, LLC (“RFFG of Cleveland”) and Ashley Ellis, LLC (“Ashley Ellis”).our acquisitions. The Company assesses goodwill for impairment at least annually. The Company early adopted, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment, which allows the Company to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If the entity determines that this threshold is not met, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary. An impairment loss would be recognized to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.

The Company follows the provisions of the accounting standard which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and enhances fair value measurement disclosure. Under these provisions, fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

The standard establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use on unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. The hierarchy is described below:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs.

Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs.

The fair value of the Company’s current assets and current liabilities approximate their carrying values due to their short term nature. The carrying value of the Company’s long-term liabilities represents their fair value based on level 3 inputs. The Company’s goodwill and other intangible assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis using level 3 inputs.

Customer lists, non-compete agreements, customer relationships, management agreements and trade names were recorded at their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition and are amortized over their estimated useful lives ranging from two to ten years using both accelerated and straight-line methods.

The Company records an impairment of long-lived assets used in operations, other than goodwill, when events or circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired and the estimated undiscounted cash flows to be generated by those assets over their remaining lives are less than the carrying amount of those items. The net carrying value of assets not recoverable is reduced to fair value, which is typically calculated using the discounted cash flow method.

Compensation expense is recorded for the fair value of stock options issued to directors and employees. The expense is measured as the estimated fair value of the stock options on the date of grant and is recorded over the vesting periods.

The Company had threehas two operating business segments a) Contract staffing services, and b) Direct hire placement services and c) Management services until July 15, 2011 when the Company stopped performing these services.   These operating segments were determined based primarily on how the chief operating decision maker views and evaluates our operations. Operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and to assess its performance. Other factors, including type of business, type of employee, length of employment and revenue recognition are considered in determining these operating segments. We did not provide management services during

Leasehold improvements are amortized over the term of the lease.

Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets acquired from various acquisitions. Goodwill is not amortized.  The Company performs a goodwill impairment test annually, by reporting unit, in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year, or whenever potential impairment triggers occur. The Company performs a qualitative impairment assessment before proceeding to the two-step impairment test. If the Company determines, on the basis of quantitative factors, that the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is more likely than not (i.e. a likelihood of more than 50 percent) not impaired, the entity would not need to calculate the fair value of the asset.  Should the two-step process be necessary, the first step of the impairment test identifies potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value including goodwill. In applying a fair-value-based test, estimates are made of the expected future cash flows to be derived from the reporting unit. Similar to the review for impairment of other long-lived assets, the resulting fair value determination is significantly impacted by estimates of future margins, capital needs, economic trends and other factors. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the impairment test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss, if any. The second step of the impairment test compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. An impairment loss would be recognized to the extent the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. There was no impairment recorded during the three and nine month periods ended June 30,December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Amortization expense was approximately $80,000 and $240,000$81,000 for the three and nine months ended June 30,December 31, 2013 respectively and was approximately $99,000 and $299,000$79,000 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.December 31, 2012.

The non-compete agreements and trade names are amortized on a straight – line basis over the estimated useful life of five years. Customer relationships are amortized based on the future undiscounted cash flows over estimated remaining useful lives of three to ten years. The management agreement intangible was being amortized over the five year term of the agreement. Over the next five years, annual amortization expense for these finite life intangible assets will be approximately $393,000 in 2013, $376,000$320,000 in 2014, $359,000$320,000 in 2015, $340,000$320,000 in 2016, and $322,000$320,000 in 2017 and $174,000$320,000 in 2018 and $200,000 thereafter.

Long-lived assets, such as purchased intangibles subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company regularly evaluates whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate possible impairment and relies on a number of factors, including operating results, business plans, economic projections, and anticipated future cash flows. The Company uses an estimate of the future undiscounted net cash flows of the related asset or asset group over the remaining life in measuring whether the assets are recoverable.

During the three and nine month periods ended June 30,December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not record any impairment of intangible assets.

During the year ended September 30, 2012,2013, the Company recorded andid not record any impairment charge of approximately $101,000 for the remaining unamortized amount of the non-compete and a certain amount of the customer relationship intangible asset related to the agricultural operation. In addition, the Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $173,000 related to the goodwill of the agriculture operation. The impairment charge represented the difference between the fair value and the carrying value of the intangible assets.   The Agricultural Division has been operating at a loss since the loss of a major customer in 2012 and management has decided that the Agricultural Services Division was not a core business in the future operations of  the Company and has discontinued operations as of July 7, 2013 and begun the process of liquidation.

The Company entered into a two-year, $4,500,000 account purchase agreement (“AR Credit Facility”) with Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (“Wells Fargo”) which has been subsequently amended. The AR Credit Facility as amended, providesprovided for borrowings, on a revolving basis, of up to 85% of the Company’s eligible accounts receivable less than 90 days old and bears interest at a rate equal to the three month LIBOR (minimum of 0.5%) plus 5.25% (effective rate was 5.75% as of June 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012)rate). Under the terms and subject to the conditions in the agreement, Wells Fargo maycould determine which receivables are eligible receivables, maycould determine the amount it will advanceadvanced on any such receivables, and maycould require the Company to repay advances made on receivables and thereby repay amounts outstanding under the AR Credit Facility on demand. Wells Fargo also hashad the right to require the Company to repurchase receivables that remainremained outstanding 90 days past their invoice date. The Company continuescontinued to be responsible for the servicing and administration of the receivables purchased and carriescarried the receivables and any outstanding borrowings on its consolidated balance sheet.

In connection with the completion of the sale of shares of common stock to PSQ in fiscal year 2009, the Company’s then Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President (the “former CEO”) retired from those positions and his employment agreement with the Company was replaced by a new consulting agreement. Under the consulting agreement, the Company became obligated to pay an annual consulting fee of $180,000 over a five-year period and to issue 500,000 shares of common stock to the former CEO for no additional consideration. During fiscal year 2009, the Company recorded a liability for the net present value of the future payments in the amount of $790,000 and recorded additional common stock in the amount of $280,000 based on a quoted market price of $0.56 per share on the date of the award. On January 31, 2013, Mr. Imhoff Jr. (the “former CEO”)he retired from all positions with the Company, however he will continue to receive his monthly payments required under his consulting agreement. As of June 30,December 31, 2013, the liability for future payments was reflected on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as$105,000 remains payable under this agreement and is include in accrued compensation $175,000.compensation.

The Company has agreed to pay the Sellers additional cash consideration of between $550,000 and $650,000 depending on the length of payments and 1,100,000 shares of Parent common stock, in full satisfaction of all amounts owed to Seller, related to the Asset Purchase Agreement.  The Company issued 1,100,000 shares of common stock on July 2, 2013, which was valued at approximately $330,000.  The Company elected to pay the cash amount due over two years.  To date, the Company paid $275,000 of the cash consideration noted above. The Company has accrued approximately $700,000$295,000 recorded in short termother current liabilities ason the condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2013.  There was approximately $20,000 of June 30,interest recorded for the three month period ended December 31, 2013.

As with any asset purchase of a businessDuring the purchaser may be held accountable for the seller’s debts and liabilities where; (i) there is an express or implied agreement of assumption; (ii) the transaction amounts to a de facto consolidation or merger of the buyer or seller corporation; (iii) the purchaser is merely a continuation of the seller; or (iv) the transaction is for the fraudulent purpose of escaping liability for the seller’s obligations. There are always several factors in the determination of any successor corporation legal liabilities related to the predecessor company. Other than the Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation,year ended September 31, 2013, the Company has not been noticedsold vehicles with a value of any additional claims, however additional claims could be material toapproximately $225,000 and leased them back under a 30 month agreement at an interest rate of approximately 23%.   At December 31, 2013, approximately $72,000 is included in other current liabilities and approximately $81,000 in other long term liabilities.   The terms are 30 months and the business.payments remaining totaled approximately $153,000 at December 31, 2013.

The Company leases space for all of its branch offices, which are located either in downtown or suburban business centers, and for its corporate headquarters. Branch offices are generally leased over periods from three to five years. The corporate office lease expires in 2015. The leases generally provide for payment of basic rent plus a share of building real estate taxes, maintenance costs and utilities.

Rent expense was approximately $257,000$237,000 and $812,000 and $296,000 and $741,000$277,000 for the three and nine month periods ended June 30,December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. As of June 30,December 31, 2013, future minimum lease payments due under non-cancelable lease agreements having initial terms in excess of one year, including certain closed offices, totaled approximately $1,925,000,$1,875,000, as follows: fiscal 2013 - $230,000, fiscal 2014 - $703,000,$793,000, fiscal 2015 - $481,000,$551,000, fiscal 2016 - $236,000$289,000, fiscal 2017 - $159,000 and thereafter - $275,000.$83,000.

In August ofSubsequent to December 31, 2013, the Company executedis negotiating a final termination agreement with the owners of the Oak Brook facility, our former headquarters.  The anticipated terms of the agreement require the Company to pay a termination fee of $125,000.  $100,000 will be paid upon execution of the termination agreement forand an additional $25,000 will be paid within 30 days of the San Mateo office, which has not been in operation for the past eight months.  This termination requiredagreement.  At December 31, 2013, the Company pay approximately $25,000 immediately, which has been accrued as of June 30, 3013, however the termination will relieve the Company of approximately $80,000 of additional lease payments over the next two years.$125,000 in other current liabilities.

As a result of the acquisition of certain of the assets of DMCC and RFFG of Cleveland the Company’s internal reporting was adjusted and as a result, the Company re-assessed its segment presentation.

The Company provides the following distinctive services: (a) direct hire placement services, (b) temporary professional services staffing in the fields of information technology, engineering, and accounting, and (c) temporary light industrial staffing. Intersegment net service revenues are not significant. Revenues generated from the temporary professional services staffing and light industrial staffing are classified as contract staffing services revenues in the statements of operations. Selling, general and administrative expenses are not separately allocated among agricultural, professional services or industrial staffing services within the contract staffing services sector for internal reporting purposes.

As of July 7, 2013, the Board of Directors of General Employment Enterprises, Inc. determined that the best course of action related to the Agricultural divisionDivision was to terminate operations and to liquidate the division’sDivision’s assets and to focus the business on the light industrial and professional divisions.  On July 7, 2013, all staffing was discontinued and the entire operations of the agricultural divisionAgricultural Division were discontinued as of August 1, 2013.  All employees have been terminated and a one-timean expense of approximately $100,000 was recognized as of June 30, 2013.

The Company will continue to pay the former head of the Agricultural divisionDivision for a period of six months and sell him the property and equipment for approximately $9,000.   The Company expects to collect the receivables over a period of the next ninety days.three to nine months.

General Employment Enterprises, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Illinois in 1962 and is the successor to employment offices doing business since 1893. The Company provides the following distinctive services: (a) professional placement services specializing in the placement of information technology, engineering, and accounting professionals for direct hire and contract staffing (b) temporary staffing services in the agricultural industry which was discontinued as of July 7, 2013, and (c)(b) temporary staffing services in light industrial staffing.

The Company provides staffing services through a network of branch offices located in major metropolitan areas throughout the United States. The Company’s professional staffing services provide information technology, engineering and accounting professionals to clients on either a regular placement basis or a temporary contract basis..basis. The Company’s industrial staffing business provides weekly temporary staffing for light industrial clients in Ohio and Pennsylvania.

Management has implemented a strategy which included cost reduction efforts as well as identifying strategic acquisitions, financed primarily through the issuance of common stock, to improve the overall profitability and cash flows of the Company. We believe our current segments complement one another and position us for future growth.

As of July 7, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors of General Employment Enterprises, Inc. determined that the best course of action related to the Agricultural divisionDivision was to terminate operations, and to liquidate the division’sits assets, and to focus the business on the light industrial and professional divisions.  On July 7, 2013, all staffing was discontinued and the entire operations of the agricultural divisionAgricultural Division were discontinued as of August 1, 2013.  All employees have been terminated and a one-timean expense of approximately $100,000 was recognized as of June 30, 2013.

Cost of services includes wages and the related payroll taxes and employee benefits of the Company’s employees while they work on contract assignments.  Cost of contract services for the three month period ended June 30,December 31, 2013 decreased by approximately 9%14% to approximately $7,038,000$7,612,000 compared with the prior period of approximately $7,702,000.$8,884,000. Cost of contract services, as a percentage of contract revenue, for the three month period ended June 30,December 31, 2013 decreased byincreased approximately 2% to 66%70% compared with the prior period of approximately 68%. The overallchange in the gross margin is related to the decrease in cost of contract services was primarily related to a $500,000 rebate received from the Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation which was off-set by an increase cost in workers compensation rates and the increase in wages in professional contract services.Placement Services revenue.  The Company has increasedis in the process of increasing our billablebilling rates in certain locations,2014 to account for the increases in workers compensation and the Affordable Care Act costs, however management believes that the overall gross margin will decrease as the Company will not be able to increase the rates and maintain the same profit margins as it has in labor costs.

See below for summary of Gross Profit percentage by segment:

Selling, general and administrative expenses include the following categories:

As a result of terminating our agricultural divisionAgricultural Division in July of 2013, we have reclassified the operations of that division to loss from discontinued operations, in the accompanying statement of operations.  For the three months ended June 30,December 31, 2013 and 2012 the companyCompany recognized a loss of $169$0 and $0,$16,000, respectively, for this division.  There continues to be approximately $234,000 of accounts receivable related to this division that management believes will be collected in 2014, however, if we are unable to collect this receivable, it would result in an additional $234,000 of expense.

As of June 30,December 31, 2013, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $1,000,$74,000, which was a decrease of approximately $363,000$287,000 from approximately $364,000$361,000 at September 30, 2012.2013. Negative net working capital at June 30,December 31, 2013 was approximately $201,000, which was a decrease$945,000, as compared to negative net working capital of approximately $742,000 from$781,000 for September 30, 2012.2013. Shareholders’ equity as of June 30,December 31, 2013 was approximately $3,258,000$2,388,000 which represented approximately 29%23% of total assets.

Net cash (used in) provided byused in operating activities for the ninethree months ended June 30,December 31, 2013 and 2012 was ($583,000)525,000) and $200,000,($721,000), respectively. The fluctuation is due to timing of our accounts receivable collections increase in net loss for the period and payments of accounts payable and payroll accruals.

Net cash used in investing activities for the ninethree months ended June 30,December 31, 2013 and June 30,December 31, 2012 was ($323,000)126,000) and ($493,000)87,000) respectively. The decreaseincrease was due to a higher amount of property and equipment acquired in the priorcurrent year and earn out payments paid in 2012 for a prior year acquisitions.2013.

Net cash flow provided by financing activities for the ninethree months ended June 30,December 31, 2013 was $551,000$364,000 compared to $581,000$691,000 in the ninethree months ended June 30,December 31, 2012. Fluctuations in financing activities are attributable to the level of borrowings.

In connection with the completion of the sale of shares of common stock to PSQ in fiscal year 2009, Herbert F. Imhoff, Jr., the Company’s then Chairman, and Chief Executive Officer and President (the “former CEO”) retired from those positions and his employment agreement with the Company was replaced by a new consulting agreement. Under the consulting agreement, the Company became obligated to pay an annual consulting fee of $180,000 over a five-year period and to issue 500,000 shares of common stock to Mr. Imhoff, Jr. for no additional consideration, and the Company recorded a liability for the net present value of the future fee payments in the amount of $790,000. As of June 30, 2013, $175,000 remains payable under this agreement and is included in accrued compensation on the Company’s balance sheet. On January 31, 2013, Mr. Imhoff Jr.he retired from all positions with the Company, however he will continue to receive his monthly payments required under his consulting agreement. As of December 31, 2013, $105,000 remains payable under this agreement and is include in accrued compensation.

The Company believes that the borrowing availability under the AR Credit FacilityKeltic facility will be adequate to fund theour working capital needs. In recent years, the Company has incurred significant losses and negative cash flows from operations. Management has implemented a strategy which included cost reduction efforts as well as identifying strategic acquisitions, to be financed primarily through the issuance of common stock to improve the overall profitability and cash flows of the Company. In addition, as discussed above,Management believes with future cash flow from operations and the availability under the Keltic facility, the Company entered into an AR Credit Facility with Wells Fargo to provide working capital financing.will have sufficient liquidity for the next 12 months.

As of June 30,December 31, 2013, the Company’s management evaluated, with the participation of its principal executive officer and its principal financial officer, the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and its principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30,December 31, 2013.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting or in any other factors that could significantly affect these controls, during the Company’s thirdfirst quarter ended June 30,December 31, 2013, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.