UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended June 30, ~~2019~~
	2020
	Or

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

Commission file number 001-31220

COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Kentucky	61-0979818
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)


346 North Mayo Trail P.O. Box 2947 Pikeville, Kentucky	~~41501~~41502
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

~~(606)~~(606) 432-1414

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock

(Title of class)

~~ctbi~~CTBI	~~NASDAQ~~ Nasdaq Global Select Market
(Trading symbol)	(Name of exchange on which registered)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☑

No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every interactive data file required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such ~~files.)~~files).

Yes ☑

No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See ~~definition~~definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ☑	Accelerated Filer ☐	Non-accelerated Filer ☐

Smaller Reporting Company ☐	Emerging Growth Company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised ﬁnancial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ☐

No ☑

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.

Common stock – ~~17,777,251~~17,802,012 shares outstanding at July 31, ~~2019~~2020

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain of the statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.’s (“CTBI”) actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words or phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may increase,” “may fluctuate,” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” and “could.” These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, economic conditions, portfolio growth, the credit performance of the portfolios, including bankruptcies, and seasonal factors; changes in general economic conditions including the performance of financial markets, prevailing inflation and interest rates, realized gains from sales of investments, gains from asset sales, and losses on commercial lending activities; the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business operations and credit quality and on general economic and financial market conditions, as well as our ability to respond to the related challenges; our participation in the Paycheck Protection Program administered by the Small Business Administration; results of various investment activities; the effects of competitors’ pricing policies, changes in laws and regulations, competition, and demographic changes on target market populations’ savings and financial planning needs; industry changes in information technology systems on which we are highly dependent; failure of acquisitions to produce revenue enhancements or cost savings at levels or within the time frames originally anticipated or unforeseen integration difficulties; and the resolution of legal proceedings and related matters. In addition, the banking industry in general is subject to various monetary, operational, and fiscal policies and regulations, which include, but are not limited to, those determined by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and state regulators, whose policies, regulations, and enforcement actions could affect CTBI’s results. These statements are representative only on the date hereof, and CTBI undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The accompanying information has not been audited by our independent registered public accountants; however, in the opinion of management such information reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim period. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and consequently do not include all of the disclosures normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America or those normally made in the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K. Accordingly, the reader of the Form 10-Q should refer to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018~~2019 for further information in this regard.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands)	(unaudited) June 30 2019			December 31 2018			(unaudited) June 30 2020			December 31 2019
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	52,545		$	64,632		$	63,194		$	58,680
Interest bearing deposits		269,094			75,718			414,891			206,003
Federal funds sold		0			1,100
Cash and cash equivalents		321,639			141,450			478,085			264,683

Certificates of deposit in other banks		245			3,920			245			245
Securities available-for-sale at fair value (amortized cost of $587,314 and $602,114, respectively)		591,586			593,746
Securities held-to-maturity at amortized cost (fair value of $619 and $649, respectively)		619			649
Debt securities available-for-sale at fair value (amortized cost of $725,392 and $593,945, respectively)								740,479			599,844
Debt securities held-to-maturity at amortized cost (fair value of $0 and $517, respectively)								0			517
Equity securities at fair value		1,727			1,173			2,094			1,953
Loans held for sale		1,067			2,461			28,987			1,167

Loans		3,192,207			3,208,638			3,538,770			3,248,664
Allowance for loan and lease losses		(34,998	)		(35,908	)
Allowance for credit losses*								(46,634	)		(35,096	)
Net loans		3,157,209			3,172,730			3,492,136			3,213,568

Premises and equipment, net		44,404			45,291			42,810			44,046
Right-of-use asset		15,028			0			13,867			14,550
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		11,360			14,713			10,408			10,474
Federal Reserve Bank stock		4,887			4,887			4,887			4,887
Goodwill		65,490			65,490			65,490			65,490
Bank owned life insurance		67,304			67,076			69,945			69,269
Mortgage servicing rights		3,119			3,607			2,518			3,263
Other real estate owned		22,536			27,273			17,675			19,480
Accrued interest receivable								14,858			14,836
Other assets		69,037			57,150			38,357			37,731
Total assets	$	4,377,257		$	4,201,616		$	5,022,841		$	4,366,003

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
Deposits:
Noninterest bearing	$	833,044		$	803,316		$	1,109,873		$	865,760
Interest bearing		2,604,137			2,502,634			2,862,436			2,539,812
Total deposits		3,437,181			3,305,950			3,972,309			3,405,572

Repurchase agreements		233,238			232,712			296,007			226,917
Federal funds purchased		3,900			1,180			1,000			7,906
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		426			436			405			415
Long-term debt		59,341			59,341			57,841			57,841
Deferred taxes		3,621			3,363			4,678			5,110
Lease liability		15,544			0
Operating lease liability								13,101			13,729
Finance lease liability								1,449			1,456
Accrued interest payable								4,508			2,839
Other liabilities		29,298			34,484			39,696			29,332
Total liabilities		3,782,549			3,637,466			4,390,994			3,751,117

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, 300,000 shares authorized and unissued		-			-			-			-
Common stock, $5 par value, shares authorized 25,000,000; shares outstanding 2019 – 17,772,309; 2018 – 17,732,853		88,862			88,665
Common stock, $5 par value, shares authorized 25,000,000; shares outstanding 2020 – 17,794,598; 2019 – 17,793,165								88,973			88,966
Capital surplus		223,833			223,161			224,688			224,907
Retained earnings		278,960			258,935			307,134			296,760
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		3,053			(6,611	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax								11,052			4,253
Total shareholders’ equity		594,708			564,150			631,847			614,886

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	4,377,257		$	4,201,616		$	5,022,841		$	4,366,003

*Effective January 1, 2020, the allowance for loan and lease losses became the allowance for credit losses with the implementation of ASU 2016-13, commonly referred to as CECL.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30					Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
(in thousands except per share data)	2019			2018			2019		2018			2020			2019			2020		2019
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans, including loans held for sale	$	41,318		$	37,791		$	82,228	$	74,368		$	41,264		$	41,318		$	81,729	$	82,228
Interest and dividends on securities
Taxable		3,089			2,422			6,252		4,892			2,867			3,089			5,913		6,252
Tax exempt		580			706			1,258		1,403			596			580			1,123		1,258
Interest and dividends on Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock		261			328			557		661			138			261			278		557
Interest on Federal Reserve Bank deposits		1,525			713			2,311		1,152			88			1,525			584		2,311
Other, including interest on federal funds sold		44			65			100		129			15			44			40		100
Total interest income		46,817			42,025			92,706		82,605			44,968			46,817			89,667		92,706

Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		8,956			5,585			17,031		10,457			5,312			8,956			12,254		17,031
Interest on repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased		1,191			723			2,347		1,358			777			1,191			1,781		2,347
Interest on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		0			2			39		4			0			0			0		39
Interest on long-term debt		643			567			1,279		1,047			417			643			926		1,279
Total interest expense		10,790			6,877			20,696		12,866			6,506			10,790			14,961		20,696

Net interest income		36,027			35,148			72,010		69,739			38,462			36,027			74,706		72,010
Provision for loan losses		1,563			1,929			1,753		2,875
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		34,464			33,219			70,257		66,864
Provision for credit losses*													(49	)		1,563			12,658		1,753
Net interest income after provision for credit losses													38,511			34,464			62,048		70,257

Noninterest income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		6,525			6,480			12,645		12,701			4,967			6,525			10,883		12,645
Gains on sales of loans, net		518			304			848		583			1,753			518			2,236		848
Trust and wealth management income		2,765			2,856			5,340		5,814			2,569			2,765			5,453		5,340
Loan related fees		440			919			1,013		2,063			822			440			917		1,013
Bank owned life insurance		689			793			1,247		2,557			564			689			1,137		1,247
Brokerage revenue		299			440			560		723			313			299			685		560
Securities gains (losses)		204			2			560		(286	)
Securities gains													937			204			1,186		560
Other noninterest income		812			1,946			2,209		2,895			954			812			1,903		2,209
Total noninterest income		12,252			13,740			24,422		27,050			12,879			12,252			24,400		24,422

Noninterest expense:
Officer salaries and employee benefits		3,297			3,220			6,671		6,434			3,104			3,297			5,855		6,671
Other salaries and employee benefits		12,790			12,202			25,375		24,607			12,049			12,790			24,329		25,375
Occupancy, net		1,812			2,043			3,863		4,159			1,938			1,812			3,923		3,863
Equipment		749			727			1,488		1,444			686			749			1,407		1,488
Data processing		1,789			1,634			3,552		3,270			1,875			1,789			3,853		3,552
Bank franchise tax		1,683			1,577			3,398		3,278			1,812			1,683			3,624		3,398
Legal fees		424			428			854		902			496			424			973		854
Professional fees		546			495			1,077		997			514			546			1,083		1,077
Advertising and marketing		874			876			1,666		1,608			568			874			1,202		1,666
FDIC insurance		369			279			546		593			294			369			441		546
Other real estate owned provision and expense		1,024			1,315			1,795		2,254			601			1,024			1,470		1,795
Repossession expense		112			304			489		713			175			112			310		489
Amortization of limited partnership investments		1,166			716			1,943		1,216			920			1,166			1,808		1,943
Other noninterest expense		3,395			6,623			6,396		9,645			2,877			3,395			5,852		6,396
Total noninterest expense		30,030			32,439			59,113		61,120			27,909			30,030			56,130		59,113

Income before income taxes		16,686			14,520			35,566		32,794			23,481			16,686			30,318		35,566
Income taxes		(1,638	)		2,921			2,303		5,381			3,829			(1,638	)		4,087		2,303
Net income		18,324			11,599			33,263		27,413			19,652			18,324			26,231		33,263

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period		6,522			(1,811	)		12,646		(7,309	)
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized holding gains on debt securities available-for-sale:
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period													8,086			6,522			10,233		12,646
Less: Reclassification adjustments for realized gains included in net income		5			2			6		151			564			5			1,045		6
Tax expense (benefit)		1,690			(381	)		2,976		(1,567	)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		4,827			(1,432	)		9,664		(5,893	)
Tax expense													1,956			1,690			2,389		2,976
Other comprehensive income, net of tax													5,566			4,827			6,799		9,664
Comprehensive income	$	23,151		$	10,167		$	42,927	$	21,520		$	25,218		$	23,151		$	33,030	$	42,927

Basic earnings per share	$	1.03		$	0.66		$	1.88	$	1.55		$	1.11		$	1.03		$	1.48	$	1.88
Diluted earnings per share	$	1.03		$	0.66		$	1.88	$	1.55		$	1.11		$	1.03		$	1.48	$	1.88

Weighted average shares outstanding-basic		17,721			17,687			17,717		17,679			17,739			17,721			17,746		17,717
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted		17,733			17,703			17,728		17,695			17,742			17,733			17,753		17,728

*Effective January 1, 2020, the provision for loan losses became the provision for credit losses with the implementation of ASU 2016-13, commonly referred to as CECL.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

Quarterly

(in thousands except per share and share amounts)
Common
Shares

Common
Stock

Capital
Surplus

Retained
Earnings

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
Total
Balance, December 31, 2017 17,692,912 $ 88,465 $ 221,472 $ 224,268 $ (3,506 ) $ 530,699
Net income 15,814 15,814
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax of $(1,186) (4,461 ) (4,461 )
Cash dividends declared ($0.33 per share) (5,836 ) (5,836 )
Issuance of common stock 29,087 145 451 596
Vesting of restricted stock (12,582 ) (63 ) 63 0
Issuance of restricted stock 11,435 57 (57 ) 0
Forfeiture of restricted stock (115 ) (1 ) 1 0
Stock-based compensation 224 224
Implementation of ASU 2014-09 453 453
Implementation of ASU 2016-01 (507 ) 507 0
Balance, March 31, 2018 17,720,737 $ 88,603 $ 222,154 $ 234,192 $ (7,460 ) $ 537,489
Net income 11,599 11,599
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax of
$(381)
(1,432 ) (1,432 )
Cash dividends declared ($0.33 per share) (5,836 ) (5,836 )
Issuance of common stock 3,991 20 184 204
Vesting of restricted stock 585 3 (3 ) 0
Stock-based compensation 151 151
Balance, June 30, 2018 17,725,313 $ 88,626 $ 222,486 $ 239,955 $ (8,892 ) $ 542,175

(in thousands except per share and share amounts)	Common Shares			Common Stock			Capital Surplus		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax		Total
Balance, March 31, 2020		17,787,274			88,936			224,277		294,223			5,486		612,922
Net income										19,652					19,652
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $1,956													5,566		5,566
Cash dividends declared ($0.38 per share)										(6,741	)				(6,741	)
Issuance of common stock		7,585			38			187							225
Vesting of restricted stock		(261	)		(1	)		1							0
Stock-based compensation								223							223
Balance, June 30, 2020		17,794,598		$	88,973		$	224,688	$	307,134		$	11,052	$	631,847

(in thousands except per share and share amounts)	Common Shares			Common Stock			Capital Surplus			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax			Total			Common Shares			Common Stock			Capital Surplus		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax			Total
Balance, December 31, 2018		17,732,853		$	88,665		$	223,161		$	258,935		$	(6,611	)	$	564,150
Net income											14,939						14,939
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $1,286														4,837			4,837
Cash dividends declared ($0.36 per share)											(6,378	)					(6,378	)
Issuance of common stock		19,065			95			163									258
Vesting of restricted stock		(12,186	)		(61	)		61									0
Issuance of restricted stock		27,921			140			(140	)								0
Forfeiture of restricted stock		(59	)		0			0									0
Stock-based compensation								181									181
Implementation of ASU 2016-02											(480	)		0			(480	)
Balance, March 31, 2019		17,767,594		$	88,839		$	223,426		$	267,016		$	(1,774	)	$	577,507			17,767,594			88,839			223,426		267,016			(1,774	)		577,507
Net income											18,324						18,324											18,324						18,324
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $1,690														4,827			4,827														4,827			4,827
Cash dividends declared ($0.36 per share)											(6,380	)					(6,380	)										(6,380	)					(6,380	)
Issuance of common stock		5,718			28			188									216			5,718			28			188								216
Vesting of restricted stock		(474	)		(2	)		2									0			(474	)		(2	)		2								0
Forfeiture of restricted stock		(529	)		(3	)		3									0			(529	)		(3	)		3								0
Stock-based compensation								214									214									214								214
Balance, June 30, 2019		17,772,309		$	88,862		$	223,833		$	278,960		$	3,053		$	594,708			17,772,309		$	88,862		$	223,833	$	278,960		$	3,053		$	594,708

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

Year-to-Date

(in thousands except per share and share amounts)	Common Shares			Common Stock			Capital Surplus			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax		Total
Balance, December 31, 2019		17,793,165		$	88,966		$	224,907		$	296,760		$	4,253	$	614,886
Implementation of ASU 2016-13											(2,366	)				(2,366	)
Balance, January 1, 2020		17,793,165			88,966			224,907			294,394			4,253		612,520
Net income											26,231					26,231
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $2,389														6,799		6,799
Cash dividends declared ($0.76 per share)											(13,491	)				(13,491	)
Issuance of common stock		29,538			148			309								457
Repurchase of common stock		(32,664	)		(164	)		(935	)							(1,099	)
Issuance of restricted stock		21,544			108			(108	)							0
Vesting of restricted stock		(16,985	)		(85	)		85								0
Stock-based compensation								430								430
Balance, June 30, 2020		17,794,598		$	88,973		$	224,688		$	307,134		$	11,052	$	631,847

(in thousands except per share and share amounts)	Common Shares			Common Stock			Capital Surplus			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax			Total			Common Shares			Common Stock			Capital Surplus			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax			Total
Balance, December 31, 2018		17,732,853		$	88,665		$	223,161		$	258,935		$	(6,611	)	$	564,150			17,732,853		$	88,665		$	223,161		$	258,935		$	(6,611	)	$	564,150
Implementation of ASU 2016-02																													(480	)		0			(480	)
Balance, January 1, 2019																				17,732,853			88,665			223,161			258,455			(6,611	)		563,670
Net income											33,263						33,263												33,263						33,263
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $2,976														9,664			9,664															9,664			9,664
Cash dividends declared ($0.72 per share)											(12,758	)					(12,758	)											(12,758	)					(12,758	)
Issuance of common stock		24,783			123			351									474			24,783			123			351									474
Issuance of restricted stock																				27,921			140			(140	)								0
Vesting of restricted stock		(12,660	)		(63	)		63									0			(12,660	)		(63	)		63									0
Issuance of restricted stock		27,921			140			(140	)								0
Forfeiture of restricted stock		(588	)		(3	)		3									0			(588	)		(3	)		3									0
Stock-based compensation								395									395									395									395
Implementation of ASU 2016-02											(480	)		0			(480	)
Balance, June 30, 2019		17,772,309		$	88,862		$	223,833		$	278,960		$	3,053		$	594,708			17,772,309		$	88,862		$	223,833		$	278,960		$	3,053		$	594,708

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

	Six Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
(in thousands)	2019			2018			2020			2019
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	33,263		$	27,413		$	26,231		$	33,263
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		2,689			1,918			2,719			2,689
Deferred taxes		(2,588	)		163			(2,034	)		(2,588	)
Stock-based compensation		432			400			472			432
Provision for loan losses		1,753			2,875
Write-downs of other real estate owned and other repossessed assets		1,181			1,320
Provision for credit losses*								12,658			1,753
Write-downs of other real estate owned								764			1,181
Gains on sale of mortgage loans held for sale		(848	)		(583	)		(2,236	)		(848	)
Securities (gains) losses, net		(6	)		286
Securities gains, net								(1,045	)		(6	)
Change in fair market value of equity securities		(554	)		0			(141	)		(554	)
(Gains) losses on sale of assets, net		38			(69	)
Gains (losses) on sale of assets, net								(30	)		38
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale		44,665			26,254			104,642			44,665
Funding of mortgage loans held for sale		(42,423	)		(25,731	)		(130,226	)		(42,423	)
Amortization of securities premiums and discounts, net		2,361			2,407			2,416			2,361
Change in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance		(843	)		(2,191	)		(676	)		(843	)
Payment of operating lease liabilities		(848	)		0			(855	)		(848	)
Mortgage servicing rights:
Fair value adjustments		795			(77	)		1,305			795
New servicing assets created		(307	)		(211	)		(560	)		(307	)
Changes in:
Accrued interest receivable								(22	)		(491	)
Other assets		(11,913	)		(6,288	)		(626	)		(11,422	)
Accrued interest payable								1,669			(2,698	)
Other liabilities		(5,211	)		8,179			10,197			(2,513	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		21,636			36,065			24,622			21,636

Cash flows from investing activities:
Certificates of deposit in other banks:
Maturity of certificates of deposit		3,675			4,165			0			3,675
Securities available-for-sale (AFS):
Purchase of AFS securities		(111,117	)		(131,770	)		(376,320	)		(111,117	)
Proceeds from the sales of AFS securities		25,734			57,079			64,293			25,734
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities of AFS securities		97,829			64,535			179,209			97,829
Securities held-to-maturity (HTM):
Proceeds from maturities of HTM securities		30			0			517			30
Change in loans, net		15,176			(49,769	)		(294,547	)		15,176
Purchase of premises and equipment		(1,042	)		(2,083	)		(573	)		(1,042	)
Proceeds from sale and retirement of premises and equipment		13			23			0			13
Redemption of stock by Federal Home Loan Bank		3,353			0			66			3,353
Proceeds from sale of other real estate and repossessed assets		2,123			928			1,351			2,123
Proceeds from settlement of bank owned life insurance		615			3,678			0			615
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		36,389			(53,214	)		(426,004	)		36,389

Cash flows from financing activities:
Change in deposits, net		131,231			45,545			566,737			131,231
Change in repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased, net		3,246			5,633			62,184			3,246
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances		30,000			0			25,000			30,000
Payments on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		(30,010	)		(43	)		(25,010	)		(30,010	)
Payment of finance lease liabilities		(7	)		0			(7	)		(7	)
Issuance of common stock		474			800			457			474
Repurchase of common stock								(1,099	)		0
Dividends paid		(12,770	)		(11,675	)		(13,478	)		(12,770	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		122,164			40,260			614,784			122,164
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		180,189			23,111			213,402			180,189
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		141,450			175,274			264,683			141,450
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	321,639			198,385		$	478,085		$	321,639

Supplemental disclosures:
Income taxes paid	$	6,500		$	5,100
Income taxes paid							$	8,645		$	6,500
Interest paid		18,218			10,898			13,292			18,218
Non-cash activities:
Loans to facilitate the sale of other real estate owned and repossessed assets		2,650			2,406
Loans to facilitate the sale of other real estate owned								1,582			2,650
Common stock dividends accrued, paid in subsequent quarter		208			202			233			208
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans		1,242			2,843			1,862			1,242

*Effective January 1,2020, the provision for loan losses became the provision for credit losses with the implementation of ASU 2016-13, commonly referred to as CECL.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (which consist of normal recurring adjustments) necessary, to present fairly the condensed consolidated financial position as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the results of operations, other comprehensive income, and changes in shareholders’ equity, for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019. and ~~the~~ cash flows for the six months ended June ~~30, 2019~~30,2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, these statements do not include certain information and footnote disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete annual financial statements. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June ~~30,~~30,2020 and 2019 and ~~2018 and the~~ cash flows for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, ~~2018~~2019 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”) for that period. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, included in our annual report on Form 10-K.

Principles of Consolidation – The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CTBI and its separate and distinct, wholly owned subsidiaries Community Trust Bank, Inc. (“CTB”) and Community Trust and Investment Company (“CTIC”). All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Reclassifications – Certain reclassifications considered to be immaterial have been made in the prior year condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to current year classifications. These reclassifications had no effect on net income.

New Accounting Standards –

➢ ~~Leases~~ ~~– In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,~~ ~~Leases (Topic 842)~~. ASU 2016-02 establishes a right-of-use model that requires a lessee to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. For lessors, the guidance modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. A lease will be treated as a sale if it transfers all of the risks and rewards, as well as control of the underlying asset, to the lessee. If risks and rewards are conveyed without the transfer of control, the lease is treated as a financing. If the lessor does not convey risks and rewards or control, an operating lease results. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years for public business entities. Entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements. This ASU is intended to reduce costs and ease implementation of the leases standard for financial statement preparers. ASU 2018-11 provides a new transition method and a practical expedient for separating components of a contract.

~~Transition: Comparative Reporting at Adoption~~

The amendments in ASU 2018-11 provide entities with an additional (and optional) transition method to adopt the new leases standard. Under this new transition method, an entity initially applies the new leases standard at the adoption date and recognizes a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption consistent with preparers’ requests. Consequently, an entity’s reporting for the comparative periods presented in the financial statements in which it adopts the new leases standard will continue to be in accordance with current GAAP in Topic 840, ~~Leases~~. An entity that elects this additional (and optional) transition method must provide the required Topic 840 disclosures for all periods that continue to be in accordance with Topic 840. The amendments do not change the existing disclosure requirements in Topic 840 (for example, they do not create interim disclosure requirements that entities previously were not required to provide).

~~Separating Components of a Contract~~

The amendments in ASU 2018-11 provide lessors with a practical expedient, by class of underlying asset, to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease component and, instead, to account for those components as a single component if the non-lease components otherwise would be accounted for under the new revenue guidance (Topic 606) and both of the following are met:

~~The timing and pattern of transfer of the non-lease component(s) and associated lease component are the same.~~

~~The lease component, if accounted for separately, would be classified as an operating lease.~~

An entity electing this practical expedient (including an entity that accounts for the combined component entirely in Topic 606) is required to disclose certain information, by class of underlying asset, as specified in the ASU.

We elected the optional transition method of the modified retrospective approach provided in ASU 2018-11 which was applied on January 1, 2019. CTBI also elected certain relief options offered in ASU 2016-02, including the package of practical expedients, the option not to separate lease and non-lease components, and instead to account for them as a single lease component for all classes of assets, the hindsight practical expedient to allow entities to use hindsight when determining lease term and impairment of right-of-use assets, and the option not to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities that arise from short-term leases (i.e., leases with terms of twelve months or less). Refer to note 6, Leases, below for further information regarding the impact of adoption.

➢Accounting for Credit Losses – In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This ASU is commonly referred to as “CECL” (Current Expected Credit Loss). The provisions of ASU 2016-13 were issued to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value through net income, including loans held for investment, held-to-maturity debt securities, trade and other receivables, net investment in leases and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. This ASU requires that financial assets measured at amortized cost be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. The amendments in ASU 2016-13 eliminate the probable incurred loss recognition in current GAAP and reflect an entity’s current estimate of all expected credit losses. The measurement of expected credit losses is based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the financial assets.

The standard also included revisions and updates to the required footnote disclosures. Please refer to Note 4 below.

For purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination (“PCD assets”) that are measured at amortized cost, the initial allowance for credit losses is added to the purchase price rather than being reported as a credit loss expense. Subsequent changes in the allowance for credit losses on PCD assets are recognized through the statement of income as a credit loss expense.

Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities ~~will be~~are recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a direct write-down to the security. Management estimates potential losses on unfunded commitments, which are not unconditionally cancellable by CTBI, by calculating an anticipated funding rate based on internal data and applies an estimated loss factor to the amounts expected to be funded. CTBI maintains an unfunded commitment allowance as part of other liabilities. The impact of the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13 was an increase of $112 thousand to this allowance and an $84 thousand impact to equity, net of tax.

ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. ~~Early adoption~~CTB elected ASU 2019-04 which allows that accrued interest will continue to be presented separately and not part of amortized cost on loans. The difference in amortized cost basis versus consideration of loan balances impacts the ACL calculation by 1 basis point and is ~~permitted~~considered immaterial. The primary difference is for ~~fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018.~~indirect lending premiums. Per ASC 326-20-30-2, if a loan does not share risk characteristics with other pooled loans, then the loan shall be evaluated for expected credit losses on an individual basis. In determining what loans should be evaluated individually, CTBI has established that any loan with a balance of $1 million or greater that has one of the following characteristics with be individually evaluated: has a criticized risk rating, is in nonaccrual status, is a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”), or is 90 days or more past due.

Loans that meet the above criteria will be tested individually for loss exposure on a quarterly basis using a fair market value of the collateral securing the loan less estimated selling costs as compared to the recorded investment of the loan (principal plus interest owed unless in a nonaccrual status). As an alternative, loans that are dependent upon the cash flows from business operations may be tested by determining the net present value of future cash flows discounted by the effective interest rate of the loan over the remaining term of the loan as appropriate. A specific valuation reserve will be established for any individually tested loans that have loss exposure unless a charge-down of the loan balance is more appropriate.

As previously disclosed, CTBI formed an implementation team ~~working through~~to oversee the ~~provisions~~adoption of the ASU ~~2016-13~~ including assessing the impact on its accounting and disclosures. The implementation team was a cross-functional working group comprised of individuals from areas including credit, finance, and operations. The team has established the historical data ~~that will be~~ available and has identified the ~~potential~~ loan segments to be analyzed. Credit losses for loans that no longer share similar risk characteristics are estimated on an individual basis. The team ~~is in the process of determining~~has determined the portfolio methodologies and relevant economic factors to be utilized and ~~plans to begin~~began running parallel with its current model as part of the monthly fourth quarter 2019 loan portfolio analysis.The team has developed a CECL allowance model which calculates reserves over the life of the loan and is largely driven by historical losses, portfolio characteristics, risk-grading, economic outlook, and other qualitative factors. The methodologies utilize a single economic forecast over a twelve month reasonable and supportable forecast period with immediate reversion to historical losses. CTBI adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2020 using the modified retrospective approach. The effect of adoption was a $3.0 million increase in the ~~third quarter~~allowance for credit losses (formerly referred to as the allowance for loan losses) and a $112 thousand increase in other liabilities for off-balance sheet credit exposure with a related decrease in shareholders’ equity of ~~2019.~~$2.4 million, net of deferred tax. The table below shows the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 by major loan classifications:

	December 31, 2019 Probable Incurred Losses					January 1, 2020 CECL Adoption
(dollars in thousands)	Amount		% of Portfolio			Amount		% of Portfolio
Allowance for loan and lease losses transitioned to allowance for credit losses:
Commercial	$	21,683		1.30	%	$	21,680		1.30	%
Residential mortgage		5,501		0.61	%		7,319		0.81	%
Consumer direct		1,711		1.16	%		1,671		1.13	%
Consumer indirect		6,201		1.18	%		7,467		1.42	%
Total allowance for loan and lease losses/allowance for credit losses	$	35,096		1.08	%	$	38,137		1.17	%

Reserve for unfunded lending commitments	$	274				$	386

In December 2018, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”), and the FDIC (the “FDIC” and, together with the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC, the “federal banking regulators”) approved a final rule to address changes to credit loss accounting under GAAP, including banking organizations’ implementation of CECL. The final rule provided banking organizations the option to phase in over a three-year period the day-one adverse effects on regulatory capital that may result from the adoption of the new accounting standard.

On March 27, 2020, pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), federal banking regulators issued an interim final rule that delays the estimated impact on regulatory capital stemming from the implementation of CECL for a transition period of up to five years (the “CECL IFR”). The CECL IFR provides banking organizations that are required (as of January 1, 2020) to adopt CECL for accounting purposes under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles during 2020 an option to delay an estimate of CECL’s impact on regulatory capital. The capital relief in the CECL IFR is calibrated to approximate the difference in allowances under CECL relative to the incurred loss methodology for the first two years of the transition period. The cumulative difference at the end of the second year of the transition period is then phased in to regulatory capital over a three-year transition period. In this way, the CECL IFR gradually phases in the full effect of CECL on regulatory capital, providing a five-year transition period. CTBI adopted CECL effective January 1, 2020 and chose the option to delay the estimated impact on regulatory capital using the relief options described above.

➢ Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment – In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) – Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. These amendments eliminate Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The amendments also eliminate the requirements from any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods with those fiscal ~~years. ASU 2017-04 should~~years, to be implemented on a prospective basis. ~~Management does not expect~~CTBI adopted ASU 2017-04 ~~to have an~~with no impact on ~~CTBI’s~~our consolidated financial statements.

➢ Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement – In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)—Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU No. 2018-13 modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820 as follows:

Removals

The following disclosure requirements were removed from Topic 820:

The amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy

The policy for timing of transfers between levels

The valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements

Modifications

The following disclosure requirements were modified in Topic 820:

For investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value, an entity is required to disclose the timing of liquidation of an investee’s assets and the date when restrictions from redemption might lapse only if the investee has communicated the timing to the entity or announced the timing publicly; and

The amendments clarify that the measurement uncertainty disclosure is to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date.

Additions

The following disclosure requirements were added to Topic 820:

The changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period; and

The range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. For certain unobservable inputs, an entity may disclose other quantitative information (such as the median or arithmetic average) in lieu of the weighted average if the entity determines that other quantitative information would be a more reasonable and rational method to reflect the distribution of unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements.

In addition, the amendments eliminate “at a minimum” from the phrase “an entity shall disclose at a minimum” to promote the appropriate exercise of discretion by entities when considering fair value measurement disclosures and to clarify that materiality is an appropriate consideration of entities and their auditors when evaluating disclosure requirements.

CTBI ~~plans to adopt~~adopted ASU 2018-13 effective January 1, 2020 with minimal changes to our current reporting.

➢ Accounting for Costs of Implementing a Cloud Computing Service Agreement– In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, which reduces complexity for the accounting for costs of implementing a cloud computing service arrangement. This standard aligns the accounting for implementation costs of hosting arrangements, regardless of whether they convey a license to the hosted software.

The ASU aligns the following requirements for capitalizing implementation costs:

Those incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract, and

Those incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license).

This ASU ~~will be~~was effective beginning January 1, 2020 with no significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.

➢Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes – In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes. The amendments in this ASU simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing the following exceptions:

1. Exception to the incremental approach for intra period tax allocation when there is a loss from continuing operations and income or a gain from other items (for example, discontinued operations or other comprehensive income);

2. Exception to the requirement to recognize a deferred tax liability for equity method investments when a foreign subsidiary becomes an equity method investment;

3. Exception to the ability not to recognize a deferred tax liability for a foreign subsidiary when a foreign equity method investment becomes a subsidiary; and

4. Exception to the general methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period when a year-to-date loss exceeds the anticipated loss for the year.

The amendments in this ASU also simplify the accounting for income taxes by doing the following:

1. Requiring that an entity recognize a franchise tax (or similar tax) that is partially based on income as an income-based tax and account for any incremental amount incurred as a non-income-based tax;

2. Requiring that an entity evaluate when a step up in the tax basis of goodwill should be considered part of the business combination in which the book goodwill was originally recognized and when it should be considered a separate transaction;

3. Specifying that an entity is not required to allocate the consolidated amount of current and deferred tax expense to a legal entity that is not subject to tax in its separate financial statements. However, an entity may elect to do so (on an entity-by-entity basis) for a legal entity that is both not subject to tax and disregarded by the taxing authority;

4. Requiring that an entity reflect the effect of an enacted change in tax laws or rates in the annual effective tax rate computation in the interim period that includes the enactment date; and

5. Making minor codification improvements for income taxes related to employee stock ownership plans and investments in qualified affordable housing projects accounted for using the equity method.

For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. We do not anticipate a significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.

➢Clarifying the Interactions between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815, a consensus of the FASB Emerging Task Force – In January 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-01, Investments—Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in this ASU clarify certain interactions between the guidance to account for certain equity securities under Topic 321, the guidance to account for investments under the equity method of accounting in Topic 323, and the guidance in Topic 815, which could change how an entity accounts for an equity security under the measurement alternative or a forward contract or purchased option to purchase securities that, upon settlement of the forward contract or exercise of the purchased option, would be accounted for under the equity method of accounting or the fair value option in accordance with Topic 825, Financial Instruments. These amendments improve current GAAP by reducing diversity in practice and increasing comparability of the accounting for these interactions. For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for public business entities for periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively. Under a prospective transition, an entity should apply the amendments at the beginning of the interim period that includes the adoption date. We do not anticipate a significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.

➢Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting – In April 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) —Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. In response to concerns about structural risks of interbank offered rates, and, particularly, the risk of cessation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), regulators around the world have undertaken reference rate reform initiatives to identify alternative reference rates that are more observable or transaction-based and less susceptible to manipulation. The amendments in this ASU provide optional guidance for a limited time to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects) of reference rate reform on financial reporting and provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. This ASU applies only to contracts and hedging relationships that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform. The expedients and exceptions provided by the amendments do not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022. The amendments in this ASU are elective and are effective upon issuance for all entities. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes. Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results will inevitably differ from our estimates. Such differences could be material to the consolidated financial statements.

We believe the application of accounting policies and the estimates required therein are reasonable. These accounting policies and estimates are constantly reevaluated, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change. Historically, we have found our application of accounting policies to be appropriate, and actual results have not differed materially from those determined using necessary estimates.

We have identified the following critical accounting policies:

Investments–Management determines the classification of securities at purchase. We classify debt securities into held-to-maturity, trading, or available-for-sale categories. Held-to-maturity securities are those which we have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 320, Investments – Debt Securities, investments in debt securities that are not classified as held-to-maturity shall be classified in one of the following categories and measured at fair value in the statement of financial position:

a. Trading securities. Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term (thus held for only a short period of time) shall be classified as trading securities. Trading generally reflects active and frequent buying and selling, and trading securities are generally used with the objective of generating profits on short-term differences in price.

b. Available-for-sale securities. Investments not classified as trading securities (nor as held-to-maturity securities) shall be classified as available-for-sale securities.

We do not have any securities that are classified as trading securities. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax. If declines in fair value are other than temporary, the carrying value of the securities is written down to fair value as a realized loss with a charge to income for the portion attributable to credit losses and a charge to other comprehensive income for the portion that is not credit related.

Gains or losses on disposition of debt securities are computed by specific identification for those securities. Interest and dividend income, adjusted by amortization of purchase premium or discount, is included in earnings.

~~When~~With the ~~fair value~~implementation of CECL, an allowance will be recognized for credit losses relative to available-for-sale securities rather than as a ~~security is below its amortized~~reduction in the cost and depending on the length of time the condition exists and the extent the fair market value is below amortized cost, additional analysis is performed to determine whether an other than temporary impairment condition exists. Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are analyzed quarterly for possible other than temporary impairment. The analysis considers (i) whether we have the intent to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and (ii) whether it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity. Often, the information available to conduct these assessments is limited and rapidly changing, making estimates of fair value subject to judgment. If actual information or conditions are different than estimated, the extentbasis of the ~~impairment~~security. Subsequent improvements in credit quality or reductions in estimated credit losses will be recognized immediately as a reversal of the ~~security may be different than~~ previously ~~estimated,~~recorded allowance, which ~~could have a material effect on CTBI’s results~~aligns the income statement recognition of ~~operations and financial condition.~~credit losses with the reporting period in which changes occur.

~~Subsequent~~Held-to-maturity (“HTM”) securities will be subject to ~~the January 1, 2018 effective date of ASU 2016-01, ASC 320 applies only to~~CECL. CECL will require an allowance on these held-to-maturity debt securities for lifetime expected credit losses, determined by adjusting historical loss information for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The forward-looking evaluation of lifetime expected losses will be performed on a pooled basis for debt securities that share similar risk characteristics. These allowances for expected losses must be made by the holder of the HTM debt security when the security is purchased. At June 30, 2020, CTBI held 0 securities designated as held-to-maturity.

CTBI accounts for equity securities in accordance with ASC 321, Investments – Equity Securities~~, applies to equity securities.~~. ASC 321 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method and those that result in the consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair values recognized in net income.

Equity securities with a readily determinable fair value are required to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized through net income. Equity securities without a readily determinable fair value are carried at cost, less any impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes for identical or similar investments. ~~An election can be made, as~~As permitted by ASC 321-10-35-2, CTBI can make an irrevocable election to subsequently measure an equity security without a readily determinable fair value, and all identical or similar investments of the same issuer, including future purchases of identical or similar investments of the same issuer, at fair value. ~~Equity securities held by CTBI include securities without readily determinable fair values.~~ CTBI has ~~elected to account~~made this election for ~~these securities at fair value.~~its Visa Class B equity securities. The fair value of these securities was determined by a third party service provider using Level 3 inputs as defined in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, and changes in fair value are recognized in income.

Loans–Loans with the ability and the intent to be held until maturity and/or payoff are reported at the carrying value of unpaid principal reduced by unearned interest, an allowance for loan and lease losses, and unamortized deferred fees or costs. Income is recorded on the level yield basis. Interest accrual is discontinued when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions, collateral value, and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful. Any loan greater than 90 days past due must be well secured and in the process of collection to continue accruing interest. Cash payments received on nonaccrual loans generally are applied against principal, and interest income is only recorded once principal recovery is reasonably assured. Loans are not reclassified as accruing until principal and interest payments remain current for a period of time, generally six months, and future payments appear reasonably certain. ~~Included in certain loan categories of impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings that were classified as impaired.~~ A restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if the creditor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.

The provisions of the CARES Act included an election to not apply the guidance on accounting for troubled debt restructurings to loan modifications, such as extensions or deferrals, related to COVID-19 made between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of (i) December 31, 2020 or (ii) 60 days after the end of the COVID-19 national emergency. The relief can only be applied to modifications for borrowers that were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. CTBI elected to adopt these provisions of the CARES Act.

Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and the net amount amortized over the estimated life of the related loans, leases, or commitments as a yield adjustment.

Allowance for ~~Loan~~Credit Losses –FASB issued ASU 2016-13 in 2016 which introduced the current expected credit losses methodology (CECL) for estimating allowances for credit losses. This accounting change was effective January 1, 2020. CTBI measures expected credit losses of financial assets on a collective (pool) basis using loss-rate methods when the financial assets share similar risk characteristics. Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. Regardless of an initial measurement method, once it is determined that foreclosure is probable, the allowance for credit losses is measured based on the fair value of the collateral as of the measurement date. As a practical expedient, the fair value of the collateral may be used for a loan when determining the allowance for credit losses for which the repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. The fair value shall be adjusted for selling costs. For collateral-dependent financial assets, the credit loss expected may be zero if the fair value less costs to sell exceed the amortized cost of the loan. Loans shall not be included in both collective assessments and ~~Lease Losses~~ – individual assessments.

In the event that collection of principal becomes uncertain, CTBI has policies in place to reverse accrued interest in a timely manner. Therefore, CTBI elected ASU 2019-04 which allows that accrued interest would continue to be presented separately and not part of amortized cost on loan. The methodology used by CTBI is developed using the current loan balance, which is then compared to amortized cost balances to analyze the impact. The difference in amortized cost basis versus consideration of loan balances impacts the allowance for credit losses calculation by 1 basis point and is considered immaterial. The primary difference is for indirect lending premiums.

We maintain an allowance for ~~loan and lease~~credit losses (“~~ALLL”~~ACL”) at a level that is appropriate to cover estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans, ~~determined to be impaired,~~ as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan and lease portfolio. Credit losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the ~~ALLL.~~ACL.

We utilize an internal risk grading system for commercial credits. Those ~~larger commercial~~ credits that ~~exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses~~meet the following criteria are subject to individual ~~review.~~evaluation: the loan has an outstanding bank share balance of $1 million or greater and (i) has a criticized risk rating, (ii) is in nonaccrual status, (iii) is a TDR, or (iv) is 90 days or more past due. The borrower’s cash flow, adequacy of collateral coverage, and other options available to CTBI, including legal remedies, are evaluated. ~~The review of individual loans includes those loans that are impaired as defined by ASC 310-10-35,~~ ~~Impairment of a Loan~~. We evaluate the collectability of both principal and interest when assessing the need for loss provision. Historical loss rates are analyzed and applied to other commercial ~~loans~~loan segments not subject to ~~specific allocations. The ALLL allocation for this pool of commercial loans is established based on the historical average, maximum, minimum, and median loss ratios.~~

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that CTBI will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.individual evaluation.

Homogenous loans, such as consumer installment, residential mortgages, and home equity lines are not individually risk graded. The associated ~~ALLL~~ACL for these loans is measured in pools with similar risk characteristics under ASC ~~450,~~ ~~Contingencies~~.

326.

When any secured commercial loan is considered uncollectable, whether past due or not, a current assessment of the value of the underlying collateral is made. If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the collateral, the loan is placed on nonaccrual and the loan is charged down to the value of the collateral less estimated cost to ~~sell~~sell. For commercial loans greater than $1million and classified as criticized, troubled debt restructuring, or nonaccrual, a specific reserve ~~equal~~is established if a loss is determined to ~~the difference between book value of the loan~~be possible and ~~the fair value assigned to the collateral~~then charged-off once it is ~~created until such time as the loan is foreclosed.~~probable. When the foreclosed collateral has been legally assigned to CTBI, the estimated fair value of the collateral less costs to sell is then transferred to other real estate owned or other repossessed assets, and a charge-off is taken for any remaining balance. When any unsecured commercial loan is considered uncollectable the loan is charged off no later than at 90 days past due.

All closed-end consumer loans (excluding conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate) are charged off no later than 120 days (5 monthly payments) delinquent. If a loan is considered uncollectable, it is charged off earlier than 120 days delinquent. For conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate, when a loan is 90 days past due, a current assessment of the value of the real estate is made. If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the property, the loan is placed on nonaccrual. Foreclosure proceedings are normally initiated after 120 days. When the foreclosed property has been legally assigned to CTBI, the fair value less estimated costs to sell is transferred to other real estate owned and the remaining balance is taken as a charge-off.

Historical loss rates for loans are adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition. ~~We use twelve rolling quarters~~With the implementation of ASC 326, weighted average life (“WAL”) calculations were completed as a tool to determine the life of CTBI’s various loan segments. Vintage modeling was used to determine the life of loan losses for ~~our historical loss rate analysis. Factors that we consider~~consumer and residential real estate loans. Static pool modeling was used to determine the life of loan losses for commercial loan segments. Qualitative factors used to derive CTBI’s total ACL include delinquency trends, current economic conditions and trends, strength of supervision and administration of the loan portfolio, levels of underperforming loans, ~~level of recoveries to prior year’s charge-offs,~~ trends in loan losses, ~~industry concentrations and their relative strengths, amount of unsecured loans,~~ and underwriting exceptions. With the implementation of ASC 326, forecasting factors including unemployment rates and industry specific forecasts for industries in which our total exposure is 5% of capital or greater are also included as factors in the ACL model. Management continually reevaluates the other subjective factors included in its ~~ALLL~~ACL analysis.

Troubled Debt Restructurings – Troubled debt restructurings are certain loans that have been modified where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions. Modifications of terms for our loans and their inclusion as troubled debt restructurings are based on individual facts and circumstances. Loan modifications that are included as troubled debt restructurings may involve either an increase or reduction of the interest rate, extension of the term of the loan, or deferral of principal and/or interest payments, regardless of the period of the modification. All of the loans identified as troubled debt restructuring were modified due to financial stress of the borrower. In order to determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed to determine the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. This evaluation is performed under CTBI’s internal underwriting policy.

When we modify loans and leases in a troubled debt restructuring, we evaluate any possible impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan agreement, or use the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs for collateral dependent loans. If we determined that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance. In periods subsequent to modification, we evaluate troubled debt restructurings, including those that have payment defaults, for possible impairment and recognize impairment through the allowance.

Other Real Estate Owned – When foreclosed properties are acquired, appraisals are obtained and the properties are booked at the current fair market value less expected sales costs. Additionally, periodic updated appraisals are obtained on unsold foreclosed properties. When an updated appraisal reflects a fair market value below the current book value, a charge is booked to current earnings to reduce the property to its new fair market value less expected sales costs. Our policy for determining the frequency of periodic reviews is based upon consideration of the specific properties and the known or perceived market fluctuations in a particular market and is typically between 12 and 18 months but generally not more than 24 months. All revenues and expenses related to the carrying of other real estate owned are recognized through the income statement.

Income Taxes – Income tax expense is based on the taxes due on the consolidated tax return plus deferred taxes based on the expected future tax benefits and consequences of temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates. Any interest and penalties incurred in connection with income taxes are recorded as a component of income tax expense in the consolidated financial statements. During the ~~three and~~ six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, CTBI has not recognized a significant amount of interest expense or penalties in connection with income taxes.

As a bank doing business in Kentucky, CTB is subject to a capital-based Kentucky bank franchise tax and exempt from Kentucky corporate income tax. However, in March 2019, Kentucky enacted HB354, which will transition CTB from the bank franchise tax to a corporate income tax beginning January 1, 2021. The current Kentucky corporate income tax rate is 5%~~. As of March 31, 2019, CTBI recorded a deferred tax liability, net of the federal benefit, of $1.0~~ ~~million due to the enactment of HB354.~~

In April 2019, Kentucky enacted HB458. HB458 allows for combined state income tax filing with CTBI, CTB, and CTIC. CTBI had previously filed a separate company return and generated net operating losses, in which it had maintained a valuation allowance against the related deferred tax asset. HB458 also allows for certain net operating losses to be utilized on a combined return. CTBI expects to file a combined return, beginning in 2021, and to utilize these previously generated losses. The tax benefit recorded in the second quarter 2019 to reverse the valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset for these losses was $~~3.6~~ ~~million.~~

Note 2 – Stock-Based Compensation

There was 0 compensation expense related to stock option grants for the three months ended June 30, 2020. CTBI’s compensation expense related to stock option grants was $10$2 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and $10 thousand and $21$21 thousand, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019, and $~~10 ~~thousand and $~~63 ~~thousand for~~2019. As of June 30, 2020, there was 0 unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards, as all stock option awards have fully vested. There were 0 stock options granted in the ~~three and~~first six months ~~ended June 30, 2018.~~ of 2020 or 2019.

Restricted stock expense for the three months and six ~~months~~ ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 was $~~222~~$244 thousand and $~~411~~$470 thousand, respectively, including $18$21 thousand and $37$42 thousand in dividends paid for each period. Restricted stock expense for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 was $~~154~~$222 thousand and $~~337~~$411 thousand, respectively, including $13$18 thousand and $25$37 thousand in dividends paid for each period. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, there was a total of $16 ~~thousand of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards that will be recognized as expense as the awards vest over a weighted average period of~~ ~~0.5~~ ~~years and a total of $1.8~~$1.9 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock grants that will be recognized as expense as the awards vest over a weighted average period of ~~2.9~~2.8 years.

NaN shares of restricted stock were granted during the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. There were no ~~stock options granted in the first six months of both 2019~~21,544 and ~~2018. There were~~ 27,921 ~~and~~ ~~11,320~~ shares of restricted stock granted during the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. The restricted stock was issued pursuant to the terms of CTBI’s 2015 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan. The restrictions on the restricted stock will lapse ratably over four years,. except for a 2,500 management retention restricted stock award granted in January 2020 which will vest at the end of five years, subject to such management employee’s continued employment. However, in the event of certain participant employee termination events occurring within 24 months of a change in control of CTBI or the death of the participant, the restrictions will lapse, and in the event of the participant’s disability, the restrictions will lapse on a pro rata basis. The Compensation Committee will have discretion to review and revise restrictions applicable to a participant’s restricted stock in the event of the participant’s retirement.

Note 3 – Securities

~~Securities~~Debt securities are classified into held-to-maturity and available-for-sale categories. Held-to-maturity (HTM) securities are those that CTBI has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost. Available-for-sale (AFS) securities are those that CTBI may decide to sell if needed for liquidity, asset-liability management or other reasons. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses included as a separate component of equity, net of tax. As of June 30,2020, CTBI had 0 held-to-maturity securities.

~~The amortized cost and fair value of securities at June 30, 2019 are summarized as follows:~~

~~Available-for-Sale~~

(in thousands)
Amortized
Cost

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies $ 150,573 $ 638 $ (469 ) $ 150,742
State and political subdivisions 103,304 2,385 (250 ) 105,439
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities 331,036 3,757 (1,788 ) 333,005
Other debt securities 2,401 0 (1 ) 2,400
Total available-for-sale securities $ 587,314 $ 6,780 $ (2,508 ) $ 591,586

~~Held-to-Maturity~~

(in thousands)
Amortized
Cost

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
State and political subdivisions $ 619 $ 0 $ 0 $ 619
Total held-to-maturity securities $ 619 $ 0 $ 0 $ 619

~~The amortized cost and fair value of securities at December 31, 2018 are summarized as follows:~~

~~Available-for-Sale~~

(in thousands)
Amortized
Cost

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies $ 219,358 $ 48 $ (1,468 ) $ 217,938
State and political subdivisions 126,280 633 (2,425 ) 124,488
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities 255,969 397 (5,547 ) 250,819
Other debt securities 507 0 (6 ) 501
Total available-for-sale securities $ 602,114 $ 1,078 $ (9,446 ) $ 593,746

~~Held-to-Maturity~~

(in thousands)
Amortized
Cost

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Fair Value
State and political subdivisions $ 649 $ 0 $ 0 $ 649
Total held-to-maturity securities $ 649 $ 0 $ 0 $ 649

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at June 30,2020 are summarized as follows:

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	89,335	$	550	$	(453	)	$	89,432
State and political subdivisions		120,194		5,752		(28	)		125,918
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		459,327		11,023		(395	)		469,955
Other debt securities		56,536		0		(1,362	)		55,174
Total available-for-sale securities	$	725,392	$	17,325	$	(2,238	)	$	740,479

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at December 31,2019 are summarized as follows:

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	171,250	$	476	$	(576	)	$	171,150
State and political subdivisions		99,403		2,941		(37	)		102,307
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		291,874		4,443		(1,072	)		295,245
Other debt securities		31,418		0		(276	)		31,142
Total available-for-sale securities	$	593,945	$	7,860	$	(1,961	)	$	599,844

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
State and political subdivisions	$	517	$	0	$	0	$	517
Total held-to-maturity securities	$	517	$	0	$	0	$	517

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at June 30,2020 by contractual maturity are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Available-for-Sale				Held-to-Maturity				Available-for-Sale
(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	11,295	$	11,322	$	619	$	619	$	12,136	$	12,195
Due after one through five years		78,460		79,028		0		0		19,933		20,503
Due after five through ten years		73,117		73,319		0		0		95,400		96,332
Due after ten years		91,005		92,512		0		0		82,060		86,320
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		331,036		333,005		0		0		459,327		469,955
Other debt securities		2,401		2,400		0		0		56,536		55,174
Total debt securities	$	587,314	$	591,586	$	619	$	619	$	725,392	$	740,479

During the three months ended June 30, ~~2019, there was~~2020, we had a net securities gain of $~~204~~937 thousand ~~thousand. There was~~, consisting of a pre-tax gain of $5565 thousand ~~thousand~~ realized on sales and calls of AFS securities ~~consisting of a pre-tax gain of $~~78 ~~thousand and a pre-tax loss of $~~73 ~~thousand,~~ and an unrealized gain of $~~199~~372 thousand ~~thousand~~ from the fair market value adjustment of equity securities. During the three months ended June 30, ~~2018, there was~~2019, we had a net securities gain of $204 thousand, consisting of a pre-tax gain of 2$5 thousand ~~thousand~~ realized on sales and calls of AFS securities ~~consisting of a pre-tax~~and an unrealized gain of $3199 thousand ~~thousand and a pre-tax loss~~from the fair market value adjustment of $1 ~~thousand.~~equity securities.

During the six months ended June 30, ~~2019, there was~~2020, we had a net securities gain of $~~560~~ ~~thousand. There was~~$1.2 million, consisting of a pre-tax gain of $6 ~~thousand~~$1.1 million realized on sales and calls of AFS securities ~~consisting of a pre-tax gain of $~~79 ~~thousand and a pre-tax loss of $~~73 ~~thousand,~~ and an unrealized gain of $~~554~~ ~~thousand~~$0.1 million from the fair market value adjustment of equity securities. During the six months ended June 30, ~~2018, there was~~2019, we had a ~~combined loss~~net securities gain of $~~286~~$560 thousand, consisting of a pre-tax gain of $6 thousand realized on sales and calls of AFS securities ~~consisting of a pre-tax~~and an unrealized gain of $~~284~~$554 thousand ~~and a pre-tax loss~~from the fair market value adjustment of $~~570~~ ~~thousand.~~

equity securities.

Equity Securities at Fair Value

~~In 2008, Visa distributed~~ ~~9,918~~ shares of Visa Class B restricted stock to CTBI which, upon resolution of certain pending legal matters, will become unrestricted and convertible into Visa Class A shares. Following this distribution, significant concern existed about the ultimate realizable value of these shares, and because CTBI did not have a basis in the stock, the shares were previously not recorded as an asset on CTBI’s balance sheet. In recent years, the concern over the realizable value has stabilized, and in late 2017 and 2018, several sales of Visa Class B shares have occurred. While not traded in observable markets, these sales were reported by several financial institutions in various SEC 8-K and 10-K filings. In 2018, FASB issued a technical correction to its guidance regarding equity securities, ASC 321-10-35-2, allowing an entity to subsequently elect to record an equity security without a readily determinable fair value. In 2018, CTBI made the election permitted by ASC ~~321-10-35-2~~321-10-35-2 to record its Visa Class B shares at fair value. ~~On December 31, 2018, CTBI recorded a $1.2~~ ~~million gain on the recognition of the fair value of~~ ~~9,918~~ ~~Visa Class B shares held in its portfolio.~~ Equity securities at fair value as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 were $~~1.7~~2.1 million ~~million,~~, as a result of a $0.4 million increase in the fair market value ~~increase~~ in the second quarter 2020. The fair market value of equity securities increased $0.2 million in the second quarter 2019.NaN equity securities were sold during the second quarter 2020.

The amortized cost of securities pledged as collateral, to secure public deposits and for other purposes, was $~~238.5~~218.3 million ~~million~~ at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and $~~258.8~~239.1 million ~~million~~ at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

The amortized cost of securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to $~~272.2~~308.7 million ~~million~~ at June ~~30, 2019~~30,2020 and $~~289.1~~261.5 million ~~million~~ at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

CTBI evaluates its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for impairment. The analysis performed as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 indicates that all impairment is considered temporary, market and interest rate driven, and not credit-related. The percentage of total debt securities with unrealized losses as of June ~~30, 2019~~30,2020 was ~~41.4%~~26.8% compared to ~~75.7%~~42.8% as of December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The following tables provide the amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, and fair market value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 that are not deemed to ~~be other-than-temporarily impaired. There were~~have credit losses. As stated above, CTBI had no ~~held-to-maturity~~HTM securities ~~that were deemed to be impaired~~ as of June 30, ~~2019.~~

2020.

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	1,840	$	(6	)	$	1,834	$	23,440	$	(112	)	$	23,328
State and political subdivisions		0		0			0		536		(28	)		508
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		0		0			0		55,124		(307	)		54,817
Other debt securities		2,401		(1	)		2,400		56,030		(1,341	)		54,689
Total <12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities		4,241		(7	)		4,234
Total <12 months impaired AFS securities									135,130		(1,788	)		133,342

12 Months or More
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		91,976		(463	)		91,513		49,653		(341	)		49,312
State and political subdivisions		19,407		(250	)		19,157		0		0			0
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		132,104		(1,788	)		130,316		15,503		(88	)		15,415
Other debt securities		0		0			0		506		(21	)		485
Total ≥12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities		243,487		(2,501	)		240,986
Total ≥12 months impaired AFS securities									65,662		(450	)		65,212

Total
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		93,816		(469	)		93,347		73,093		(453	)		72,640
State and political subdivisions		19,407		(250	)		19,157		536		(28	)		508
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		132,104		(1,788	)		130,316		70,627		(395	)		70,232
Other debt securities		2,401		(1	)		2,400		56,536		(1,362	)		55,174
Total temporarily impaired AFS securities	$	247,728	$	(2,508	)	$	245,220
Total impaired AFS securities								$	200,792	$	(2,238	)	$	198,554

The analysis performed as of December 31, ~~2018~~2019 indicated that all impairment was considered temporary, market and interest rate driven, and not credit-related. The following tables provide the amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, and fair market value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, ~~2018~~2019 that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. There were no held-to-maturity securities that were deemed to be impaired as of December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Less Than 12 Months
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	78,905	$	(271	)	$	78,634	$	25,955	$	(148	)	$	25,807
State and political subdivisions		21,707		(194	)		21,513		8,356		(37	)		8,319
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		61,940		(377	)		61,563		19,317		(100	)		19,217
Other debt securities		507		(6	)		501		31,418		(276	)		31,142
Total <12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities		163,059		(848	)		162,211		85,046		(561	)		84,485

12 Months or More
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		97,955		(1,197	)		96,758		82,339		(428	)		81,911
State and political subdivisions		51,911		(2,231	)		49,680		0		0			0
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		147,658		(5,170	)		142,488		91,609		(972	)		90,637
Other debt securities		0		0			0		0		0			0
Total ≥12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities		297,524		(8,598	)		288,926		173,948		(1,400	)		172,548

Total
U.S. Treasury and government agencies		176,860		(1,468	)		175,392		108,294		(576	)		107,718
State and political subdivisions		73,618		(2,425	)		71,193		8,356		(37	)		8,319
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		209,598		(5,547	)		204,051		110,926		(1,072	)		109,854
Other debt securities		507		(6	)		501		31,418		(276	)		31,142
Total temporarily impaired AFS securities	$	460,583	$	(9,446	)	$	451,137	$	258,994	$	(1,961	)	$	257,033

U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies

The unrealized losses in U.S. Treasury and government agencies were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than par which will equal amortized cost at maturity. CTBI does not ~~consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2019, because CTBI does not~~ intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized ~~cost, which may be maturity.~~cost.

State and Political Subdivisions

The unrealized losses in securities of state and political subdivisions were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than par which will equal amortized cost at maturity. CTBI does not ~~consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2019, because CTBI does not~~ intend to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized ~~cost, which may be maturity.~~

cost.

U.S. Government Sponsored Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities

The unrealized losses in U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate increases. CTBI expects to recover the amortized cost basis over the term of the securities. CTBI does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2019, because (i) the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, (ii) CTBI does not intend to sell the investments, and ~~(iii)~~ it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized ~~cost, which may be maturity.~~cost.

Other Debt Securities

The unrealized losses in other debt securities were caused by interest rate increases. The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than par which will equal amortized cost at maturity. CTBI does not ~~consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2019, because CTBI does not~~ intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized ~~cost, which may be maturity.~~cost.

Note 4 – Loans

Major classifications of loans, net of unearned income, deferred loan origination costs and fees, and net premiums on acquired loans, are summarized as follows:

(in thousands)
June 30
2019

December 31
2018

Commercial construction $ 65,771 $ 82,715
Commercial secured by real estate 1,192,768 1,183,093
Equipment lease financing 962 1,740
Commercial other 390,048 377,198
Real estate construction 57,017 57,160
Real estate mortgage 722,573 722,417
Home equity 109,831 106,299
Consumer direct 145,149 144,289
Consumer indirect 508,088 533,727
Total loans $ 3,192,207 $ 3,208,638

(in thousands)	June 30 2020
Hotel/motel	$	257,245
Commercial real estate residential		257,517
Commercial real estate nonresidential		772,537
Dealer floorplans		62,909
Commercial other		288,850
Commercial unsecured SBA PPP		266,951
Commercial loans		1,906,009

Real estate mortgage		780,632
Home equity lines		108,531
Residential loans		889,163

Consumer direct		147,284
Consumer indirect		596,314
Consumer loans		743,598

Loans and lease financing	$	3,538,770

(in thousands)	December 31 2019
Commercial construction	$	104,809
Commercial secured by real estate		1,169,975
Equipment lease financing		481
Commercial other		389,683
Real estate construction		63,350
Real estate mortgage		733,003
Home equity		111,894
Consumer direct		148,051
Consumer indirect		527,418
Total loans	$	3,248,664

The segments presented for June 30, 2020 reflect the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, while the December totals are presented under the previous incurred loss model. CTB adopted ASC 326 for all financial assets measured at amortized cost and off-balance sheet credit exposures. Results of reporting periods beginning January 1, 2020 are presented under ASC 326 while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable GAAP.

CTBI has segregated and evaluates its loan portfolio through ~~nine~~9 portfolio ~~segments.~~segments with similar risk characteristics. CTBI serves customers in small and mid-sized communities in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky, southern West Virginia, and northeastern Tennessee. Therefore, CTBI’s exposure to credit risk is significantly affected by changes in these communities.

~~Commercial~~

Commercial real estate residential loans ~~include~~are commercial purpose construction and permanent financed loans for commercial purpose 1-4 family/multi-family properties. These loans are originated based on the borrower’s ability to service the debt and secondarily based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.

Commercial real estate nonresidential loans are secured by nonfarm, nonresidential ~~properties, 1-4 family/multi-family~~ properties, farmland, and other commercial real estate. These loans are originated based on the borrower’s ability to service the debt and ~~secondarily~~secondarily based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. Construction for commercial real estate nonresidential loans are also included in this segment as these loans are generally one loan for construction to permanent financing.

~~Equipment lease financing~~Prior to the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, all commercial real estate loans ~~are fixed or variable leases for commercial purposes.~~

were segmented together with construction loans presented separately.

Dealer floorplans have historically been reviewed by management as a separate segment of the commercial loan portfolio although for SEC reporting they were combined within the commercial other segment. With the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, CTBI segmented dealer floorplans separately as they are a unique product with unique risk factors. The primary unique factor relevant to dealer floorplans is the ability of the borrower to misappropriate funds provided at the point of sale as their floorplan is collateralized under a blanket security agreement and without specific liens on individual units. This risk is mitigated by the use of periodic inventory audits. These audits are performed monthly and follow up is required on any out of compliance items identified. These audits are subject to increasing frequency when fact patterns suggest more scrutiny is required.

Commercial other loans consist of commercial check loans, agricultural loans, receivable financing, ~~floorplans,~~ loans to financial institutions, loans for purchasing or carrying securities, and other commercial purpose loans. Commercial loans are underwritten based on the borrower’s ability to service debt from the business’s underlying cash flows. As a general practice, we obtain collateral such as ~~real estate,~~ equipment, or other assets, although such loans may be uncollateralized but guaranteed.

~~Real estate construction~~CTBI participated in the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) established by the CARES Act resulting in a new loan segment of unsecured commercial other loans that are ~~typically~~one hundred percent guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”). These loans, which are subject to forgiveness, have maturities of either two or three to five years, depending on when the loan was made. These loans currently have no allowance for ~~owner-occupied properties. The terms of these loans are generally short-term with permanent financing upon completion.~~credit losses.

Residential real estate loans are a mixture of fixed rate and adjustable rate first and second lien residential mortgage ~~loans.~~loans and also include real estate construction loans which are typically for owner-occupied properties. The terms of the real estate construction loans are generally short-term with permanent financing upon completion. As a policy, CTBI holds adjustable rate loans and sells the majority of its fixed rate first lien mortgage loans into the ~~secondary~~secondary market. Changes in interest rates or market conditions may impact a borrower’s ability to meet contractual principal and interest payments. Residential real estate loans are secured by real property.

Home equity lines are primarily revolving adjustable rate credit lines secured by real property.

Consumer direct loans are a mixture of fixed rate and adjustable rate products comprised of unsecured loans, consumer revolving credit lines, deposit secured loans, and all other consumer purpose loans.

Consumer indirect loans are fixed rate loans secured by automobiles, trucks, vans, and recreational vehicles originated at the selling dealership underwritten and purchased by CTBI’s indirect lending department. Both new and used products are financed. Only dealers who have executed dealer agreements with CTBI participate in the indirect lending program.

Not included in the loan balances above were loans held for sale in the amount of ~~$1.1~~$29.0 million at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$2.5~~$1.2 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) for the period ended June 30, 2020 and the balance in the allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) and the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio segment and impairment method as of December 31, 2019 and June 30, 2019:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
(in thousands)	Hotel/ Motel		Commercial Real Estate Residential			Commercial Real Estate Nonresidential			Dealer Floorplans			Commercial Other			Real Estate Mortgage			Home Equity			Consumer Direct			Consumer Indirect			Total
ACL
Beginning balance	$	5,922	$	4,012		$	11,563		$	1,713		$	6,409		$	7,543		$	890		$	2,163		$	9,230		$	49,445
Provision charged to expense		210		(544	)		(34	)		(102	)		204			(112	)		(35	)		(64	)		428			(49	)
Losses charged off		0		(35	)		(128	)		(26	)		(1,993	)		(119	)		0			(261	)		(1,247	)		(3,809	)
Recoveries		0		6			7			0			83			24			1			94			832			1,047
Ending balance	$	6,132	$	3,439		$	11,408		$	1,585		$	4,703		$	7,336		$	856		$	1,932		$	9,243		$	46,634

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
(in thousands)	Hotel/ Motel		Commercial Real Estate Residential			Commercial Real Estate Nonresidential			Dealer Floorplans			Commercial Other			Real Estate Mortgage			Home Equity			Consumer Direct			Consumer Indirect			Total
ACL
Beginning balance, prior to adoption of ASC 326	$	3,371	$	3,439		$	8,515		$	802		$	5,556		$	4,604		$	897		$	1,711		$	6,201		$	35,096
Impact of adoption of ASC 326		170		(721	)		119			820			(391	)		1,893			(75	)		(40	)		1,265			3,040
Provision charged to expense		2,591		794			2,950			(11	)		1,637			987			32			673			3,005			12,658
Losses charged off		0		(86	)		(187	)		(26	)		(2,352	)		(179	)		0			(630	)		(2,764	)		(6,224	)
Recoveries		0		13			11			0			253			31			2			218			1,536			2,064
Ending balance	$	6,132	$	3,439		$	11,408		$	1,585		$	4,703		$	7,336		$	856		$	1,932		$	9,243		$	46,634

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
(in thousands)	Commercial Construction			Commercial Secured by Real Estate			Equipment Lease Financing			Commercial Other			Real Estate Construction			Real Estate Mortgage			Home Equity			Consumer Direct			Consumer Indirect			Total
ALLL
Beginning balance	$	903		$	14,800		$	10		$	5,217		$	396		$	4,053		$	901		$	1,635		$	7,089		$	35,004
Provision charged to expense		(36	)		533			(3	)		238			(38	)		299			65			400			105			1,563
Losses charged off		(71	)		(345	)		0			(824	)		0			(180	)		(34	)		(331	)		(1,012	)		(2,797	)
Recoveries		3			110			0			258			0			15			1			63			778			1,228
Ending balance	$	799		$	15,098		$	7		$	4,889		$	358		$	4,187		$	933		$	1,767		$	6,960		$	34,998

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	99		$	594		$	0		$	182		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	875
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	700		$	14,504		$	7		$	4,707		$	358		$	4,187		$	933		$	1,767		$	6,960		$	34,123

Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,487		$	37,028		$	0		$	11,508		$	0		$	2,570		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	54,593
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	62,284		$	1,155,740		$	962		$	378,540		$	57,017		$	720,003		$	109,831		$	145,149		$	508,088		$	3,137,614

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
(in thousands)	Commercial Construction			Commercial Secured by Real Estate			Equipment Lease Financing			Commercial Other			Real Estate Construction			Real Estate Mortgage			Home Equity			Consumer Direct			Consumer Indirect			Total
ALLL
Beginning balance	$	862		$	14,531		$	12		$	4,993		$	512		$	4,433		$	841		$	1,883		$	7,841		$	35,908
Provision charged to expense		2			821			(5	)		619			(154	)		21			150			281			18			1,753
Losses charged off		(71	)		(380	)		0			(1,065	)		0			(300	)		(60	)		(577	)		(2,399	)		(4,852	)
Recoveries		6			126			0			342			0			33			2			180			1,500			2,189
Ending balance	$	799		$	15,098		$	7		$	4,889		$	358		$	4,187		$	933		$	1,767		$	6,960		$	34,998

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	99		$	594		$	0		$	182		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	875
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	700		$	14,504		$	7		$	4,707		$	358		$	4,187		$	933		$	1,767		$	6,960		$	34,123

Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,487		$	37,028		$	0		$	11,508		$	0		$	2,570		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	54,593
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	62,284		$	1,155,740		$	962		$	378,540		$	57,017		$	720,003		$	109,831		$	145,149		$	508,088		$	3,137,614

	December 31, 2019
(in thousands)	Commercial Construction			Commercial Secured by Real Estate			Equipment Lease Financing			Commercial Other			Real Estate Construction			Real Estate Mortgage			Home Equity			Consumer Direct			Consumer Indirect			Total
ALLL
Balance, beginning of year	$	862		$	14,531		$	12		$	4,993			512		$	4,433		$	841		$	1,883		$	7,841		$	35,908
Provision charged to expense		497			(137	)		(8	)		3,032			(40	)		414			172			528			361			4,819
Losses charged off		(72	)		(727	)		0			(2,179	)		(100	)		(767	)		(139	)		(1,100	)		(4,652	)		(9,736	)
Recoveries		12			358			0			509			0			152			23			400			2,651			4,105
Balance, end of year	$	1,299		$	14,025		$	4		$	6,355		$	372		$	4,232		$	897		$	1,711		$	6,201			35,096

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	99		$	227		$	0		$	886		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	1,212
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,200		$	13,798		$	4		$	5,469		$	372		$	4,232		$	897		$	1,711		$	6,201		$	33,884

Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,010		$	41,379		$	0		$	11,073		$	0		$	2,309		$	0		$	0		$	0		$	57,771
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	101,799		$	1,128,596		$	481		$	378,610		$	63,350		$	730,694		$	111,894		$	148,051		$	527,418		$	3,190,893

CTBI derived its ACL balance by using vintage modeling for the consumer and residential portfolios. Static pool models incorporating losses by credit risk rating were developed to determine credit loss balances for the commercial loan segments.

Qualitative loss factors are based on CTBI's judgment of delinquency trends, level of nonperforming loans, trend in loan losses, supervision and administration, quality control exceptions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts based on unemployment rates and industry concentrations. CTBI has determined that twelve months represents a reasonable and supportable forecast period and reverts back to a historical loss rate immediately. CTBI leverages economic projections from a reputable and independent third party to form its loss driver forecasts over the twelve month forecast period. Other internal and external indicators of economic forecasts are also considered by CTBI when developing the forecast metrics.

CTBI also has an inherent model risk allocation included in its ACL calculation to allow for certain known model limitations as well as other potential risks not quantified elsewhere. Management has identified the following known model limitations and made adjustments through this portion of the calculation for them:

(1) The inability to completely identify revolving lines of credit within the commercial other segment. Management had to make assumptions regarding commercial renewals as those renewals are not tracked well by its loan system.

(2) The inability within the model to estimate the value of modifications made under troubled debt restructurings. Management has manually calculated the estimated impact based on research of modified terms for troubled debt restructurings.

Also included in inherent model risk at implementation was the estimated allowance for previously impaired loans that had not been changed on CTBI’s loan system. There were certain loans that met the definition of impaired previously that management did not consider to have significantly different risk characteristics based on the ACL methodology and segmentation, and therefore determined they would no longer require individual analysis. The inherent model risk factor was decreased by $1.6 million in the first quarter 2020 as formerly impaired loans that are no longer individually analyzed were reassigned and returned to the appropriate loan segments where the historical loss and other qualitative factors were applied.

As of June 30, 2020, CTBI’s ACL declined by $2.8 million or 19 basis points compared to March 31, 2020. The decline was primarily in the specific reserves allocated to individually evaluated loans. The decline in ACL as a percentage of loans was also driven by the large growth in PPP loans during the quarter totaling $267.0 million as of June 30, 2020. These loans were added as a segment and, as they are one hundred percent SBA guaranteed, these loans were provided no allowance for credit losses.

Refer to ~~note~~Note 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our nonaccrual policy. Nonaccrual loans segregated by class of loans and loans 90 days past due and still accruing segregated by class of loans were as follows:

(in thousands)
June 30
2019

December 31
2018

Commercial:
Commercial construction $ 510 $ 639
Commercial secured by real estate 5,655 4,537
Commercial other 1,001 797

Residential:
Real estate construction 280 22
Real estate mortgage 4,776 5,395
Home equity 680 477
Total nonaccrual loans $ 12,902 $ 11,867

	June 30, 2020
(in thousands)	Nonaccrual Loans with No ACL		Nonaccrual Loan with ACL		90+ and Still Accruing		Total Nonperforming Loans

Hotel/motel	$	0	$	0	$	132	$	132
Commercial real estate residential		1,809		1,506		5,799		9,114
Commercial real estate nonresidential		0		2,833		10,276		13,109
Commercial other		1,259		689		352		2,300
Total commercial loans		3,068		5,028		16,559		24,655

Real estate mortgage		0		5,296		4,140		9,436
Home equity lines		0		691		482		1,173
Total residential loans		0		5,987		4,622		10,609

Consumer direct		0		275		97		372
Consumer indirect		0		0		521		521
Total consumer loans		0		275		618		893

Loans and lease financing	$	3,068	$	11,290	$	21,799	$	36,157

(in thousands)	December 31 2019
Commercial:
Commercial construction	$	230
Commercial secured by real estate		3,759
Commercial other		3,839

Residential:
Real estate construction		634
Real estate mortgage		4,821
Home equity		716
Total nonaccrual loans	$	13,999

The following tables present CTBI’s loan portfolio aging analysis, segregated by class, as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:

June 30, 2019
(in thousands)
30-59 Days
Past Due

60-89 Days
Past Due

90+ Days
Past Due

Total Past
Due
Current Total Loans
90+ and
Accruing*

Commercial:
Commercial construction $ 56 $ 30 $ 546 $ 632 $ 65,139 $ 65,771 $ 36
Commercial secured by real estate 4,593 10,933 10,720 26,246 1,166,522 1,192,768 5,816
Equipment lease financing 0 0 0 0 962 962 0
Commercial other 988 2,742 822 4,552 385,496 390,048 174
Residential:
Real estate construction 290 21 285 596 56,421 57,017 5
Real estate mortgage 1,104 5,170 7,401 13,675 708,898 722,573 4,529
Home equity 709 325 575 1,609 108,222 109,831 258
Consumer:
Consumer direct 926 178 40 1,144 144,005 145,149 40
Consumer indirect 3,514 850 218 4,582 503,506 508,088 218
Total $ 12,180 $ 20,249 $ 20,607 $ 53,036 $ 3,139,171 $ 3,192,207 $ 11,076

	June 30, 2020
(in thousands)	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90+ Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans
Hotel/motel	$	0	$	0	$	132	$	132	$	257,113	$	257,245
Commercial real estate residential		881		90		7,205		8,176		249,341		257,517
Commercial real estate nonresidential		2,810		420		12,011		15,241		757,296		772,537
Dealer floorplans		0		0		0		0		62,909		62,909
Commercial other		471		417		2,110		2,998		285,852		288,850
Commercial unsecured SBA PPP		0		0		0		0		266,951		266,951
Total commercial loans		4,162		927		21,458		26,547		1,879,462		1,906,009

Real estate mortgage		1,595		3,825		6,071		11,491		769,141		780,632
Home equity lines		717		431		787		1,935		106,596		108,531
Total residential loans		2,312		4,256		6,858		13,426		875,737		889,163

Consumer direct		360		116		372		848		146,436		147,284
Consumer indirect		1,935		497		521		2,953		593,361		596,314
Total consumer loans		2,295		613		893		3,801		739,797		743,598

Loans and lease financing	$	8,769	$	5,796	$	29,209	$	43,774	$	3,494,996	$	3,538,770

	December 31, 2018														December 31, 2019
(in thousands)	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90+ Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		90+ and Accruing*		30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90+ Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans		90+ and Accruing*
Commercial:
Commercial construction	$	87	$	58	$	698	$	843	$	81,872	$	82,715	$	58	$	118	$	0	$	467	$	585	$	104,224	$	104,809	$	237
Commercial secured by real estate		6,287		1,204		8,776		16,267		1,166,826		1,183,093		4,632		2,734		5,969		12,366		21,069		1,148,906		1,169,975		8,820
Equipment lease financing		0		0		0		0		1,740		1,740		0		0		0		0		0		481		481		0
Commercial other		1,057		94		1,067		2,218		374,980		377,198		581		880		284		6,267		7,431		382,252		389,683		2,586
Residential:
Real estate construction		144		438		28		610		56,550		57,160		6		117		52		634		803		62,547		63,350		0
Real estate mortgage		1,272		5,645		7,607		14,524		707,893		722,417		4,095		774		5,376		10,320		16,470		716,533		733,003		7,088
Home equity		898		365		441		1,704		104,595		106,299		246		1,084		412		736		2,232		109,662		111,894		344
Consumer:
Consumer direct		918		191		74		1,183		143,106		144,289		74		945		230		97		1,272		146,779		148,051		97
Consumer indirect		4,715		975		507		6,197		527,530		533,727		506		4,037		909		447		5,393		522,025		527,418		448
Total	$	15,378	$	8,970	$	19,198	$	43,546	$	3,165,092	$	3,208,638	$	10,198
Loans and lease financing															$	10,689	$	13,232	$	31,334	$	55,255	$	3,193,409	$	3,248,664	$	19,620

*90+ and Accruing are also included in 90+ Days Past Due column.

The risk characteristics of CTBI’s material portfolio segments are as follows:

Hotel/motel loans are a significant concentration for CTBI, representing approximately 7.3% of total loans. This industry has unique risk characteristics as it is highly susceptible to changes in the domestic and global economic environments, which can cause the industry to experience substantial volatility. These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Hotel/motel lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Management monitors and evaluates all commercial real estate loans based on collateral and risk grade criteria. Commercial construction loans generally are made to customers for the purpose of building income-producing properties, and any hotel/motel construction loan would be included in this segment. Personal guarantees of the principals are generally required. Such loans are made on a projected cash flow basis and are secured by the project being constructed. Construction loan draw procedures are included in each specific loan agreement, including required documentation items and inspection requirements. Construction loans may convert to term loans at the end of the construction period, or may be repaid by the take-out commitment from another financing source. If the loan is to convert to a term loan, the repayment ability is based on the borrower’s projected cash flow. Risk is mitigated during the construction phase by requiring proper documentation and inspections whenever a draw is requested. Loans in amounts greater than $500,000 generally require a performance bond to be posted by the general contractor to assure completion of the project.

Commercial real estate residential loans are commercial purpose construction and permanent financed loans for commercial purpose 1-4 family/multi-family properties. All commercial real estate loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Management monitors and evaluates all commercial real estate loans based on collateral and risk grade criteria. Commercial residential construction loans generally are made to customers for the purpose of building income-producing properties. Personal guarantees of the principals are generally required. Such loans are made on a projected cash flow basis and are secured by the project being constructed. Construction loan draw procedures are included in each specific loan agreement, including required documentation items and inspection requirements. Construction loans may convert to term loans at the end of the construction period, or may be repaid by the take-out commitment from another financing source. If the loan is to convert to a term loan, the repayment ability is based on the borrower’s projected cash flow. Risk is mitigated during the construction phase by requiring proper documentation and inspections whenever a draw is requested. Loans in amounts greater than $500,000 generally require a performance bond to be posted by the general contractor to assure completion of the project.

Commercial real estate nonresidential loans are secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties, farmland, and other commercial real estate. Construction for commercial real estate nonresidential loans are also included in this segment as these loans are generally one loan for construction to permanent financing. All commercial real estate loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate. Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan. Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy. Management monitors and evaluates all commercial real estate loans based on collateral and risk grade criteria. Commercial nonresidential construction loans generally are made to customers for the purpose of building income-producing properties. Personal guarantees of the principals are generally required. Such loans are made on a projected cash flow basis and are secured by the project being constructed. Construction loan draw procedures are included in each specific loan agreement, including required documentation items and inspection requirements. Construction loans may convert to term loans at the end of the construction period, or may be repaid by the take-out commitment from another financing source. If the loan is to convert to a term loan, the repayment ability is based on the borrower’s projected cash flow. Risk is mitigated during the construction phase by requiring proper documentation and inspections whenever a draw is requested. Loans in amounts greater than $500,000 generally require a performance bond to be posted by the general contractor to assure completion of the project.

~~Equipment lease financing is underwritten~~Prior to the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, all commercial real estate loans were segmented together with construction loans presented separately.

Dealer floorplans have historically been reviewed by ~~our commercial lenders using the same underwriting standards~~management as ~~would be applied to~~ a secured commercial loan requesting 100% financing. The pricing for equipment lease financing is comparable to that of borrowers with similar quality commercial credits with similar collateral. Maximum terms of equipment leasing are determined by the type and expected life of the equipment to be leased. Residual values are determined by appraisals or opinion letters from industry experts. Leases must be in conformity with our consolidated annual tax plan. As we underwrite our equipment lease financing in a manner similar to our commercial loan portfolio described below, the risk characteristics for this portfolio mirror thatseparate segment of the commercial loan ~~portfolio.~~portfolio although for SEC reporting they were combined within the commercial other segment. With the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, CTBI segmented dealer floorplans separately as they are a unique product with unique risk factors. CTBI maintains strict processing procedures over its floorplan product with any exceptions requested by a loan officer approved by the appropriate loan committee and the floorplan manager.

Commercial other loans are primarily based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower. The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value. Most commercial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and may incorporate a personal guarantee; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis. In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers. As we underwrite our equipment lease financing in a manner similar to our commercial loan portfolio described below, the risk characteristics for this portfolio mirror that of the commercial loan portfolio.

CTBI’s participation in the CARES Act PPP loan program has resulted in a new loan segment of unsecured commercial other loans that are one hundred percent SBA guaranteed. These loans, which are subject to forgiveness, have maturities of either two or three to five years, depending on when the loans was made. These loans currently have no allowance for credit losses.

With respect to residential loans that are secured by 1-4 family residences and are generally owner occupied, CTBI generally establishes a maximum loan-to-value ratio and requires private mortgage insurance if that ratio is exceeded. Home equity loans are typically secured by a subordinate interest in 1-4 family residences. Residential construction loans are handled through the home mortgage area of the bank. The repayment ability of the borrower and the maximum loan-to-value ratio are calculated using the normal mortgage lending criteria. Draws are processed based on percentage of completion stages including normal inspection procedures. Such loans generally convert to term loans after the completion of construction.

Consumer loans are secured by consumer assets such as automobiles or recreational vehicles. Some consumer loans are unsecured such as small installment loans and certain lines of credit. Our determination of a borrower’s ability to repay these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income and credit rating of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels. Repayment can also be impacted by changes in property values on residential properties. Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers.

The indirect lending area of the bank generally deals with purchasing/funding consumer contracts with new and used automobile dealers. The dealers generate consumer loan applications which are forwarded to the indirect loan processing area for approval or denial. Loan approvals or denials are based on the creditworthiness and repayment ability of the borrower, and on the collateral value. The dealers may have limited recourse agreements with CTB.

Credit Quality Indicators:

CTBI categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. CTBI also considers the fair value of the underlying collateral and the strength and willingness of the guarantor(s). CTBI analyzes commercial loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. Loans classified as loss, doubtful, substandard, or special mention are reviewed quarterly by CTBI for further deterioration or improvement to determine if appropriately classified and valued if deemed impaired. All other commercial loan reviews are completed every 12 to 18 months. In addition, during the renewal process of any loan, as well as if a loan becomes past due or if other information becomes available, CTBI will evaluate the loan grade. CTBI uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

➢

Pass grades include investment grade, low risk, moderate risk, and acceptable risk loans. The loans range from loans that have no chance of resulting in a loss to loans that have a limited chance of resulting in a loss. Customers in this grade have excellent to fair credit ratings. The cash flows are adequate to meet required debt repayments.

➢

Watch graded loans are loans that warrant extra management attention but are not currently criticized. Loans on the watch list may be potential troubled credits or may warrant “watch” status for a reason not directly related to the asset quality of the credit. The watch grade is a management tool to identify credits which may be candidates for future classification or may temporarily warrant extra management monitoring.

➢

Other assets especially mentioned (OAEM) reflects loans that are currently protected but are potentially weak. These loans constitute an undue and unwarranted credit risk but not to the point of justifying a classification of substandard. The credit risk may be relatively minor yet constitute an unwarranted risk in light of circumstances surrounding a specific asset. Loans in this grade display potential weaknesses which may, if unchecked or uncorrected, inadequately protect CTBI’s credit position at some future date. The loans may be adversely affected by economic or market conditions.

➢

Substandard grading indicates that the loan is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged. These loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the orderly liquidation of the debt with the distinct possibility that CTBI will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

➢

Doubtful graded loans have the weaknesses inherent in the substandard grading with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. The probability of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors which may work to CTBI’s advantage or strengthen the asset(s), its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined. Pending factors include proposed merger, acquisition, or liquidation procedures, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral, and refinancing plans.

The following tables present the credit risk profile of CTBI’s commercial loan portfolio based on rating category and payment activity, segregated by class of loans asand based on last credit decision or year of ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~and December 31, 2018:~~origination:

(in thousands)
Commercial
Construction

Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate

Equipment
Leases

Commercial
Other
Total
June 30, 2019
Pass $ 58,755 $ 1,048,466 $ 962 $ 354,284 $ 1,462,467
Watch 2,878 64,145 0 13,995 81,018
OAEM 835 19,764 0 5,295 25,894
Substandard 3,303 60,305 0 16,406 80,014
Doubtful 0 88 0 68 156
Total $ 65,771 $ 1,192,768 $ 962 $ 390,048 $ 1,649,549

December 31, 2018
Pass $ 74,222 $ 1,038,309 $ 1,740 $ 327,431 $ 1,441,702
Watch 3,070 71,834 0 28,986 103,890
OAEM 1,594 19,734 0 5,735 27,063
Substandard 3,829 53,125 0 14,970 71,924
Doubtful 0 91 0 76 167
Total $ 82,715 $ 1,183,093 $ 1,740 $ 377,198 $ 1,644,746

	Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
(in thousands)	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016		Prior		Revolving Loans		Total
Hotel/motel
Risk rating:
Pass/watch	$	15,859	$	76,877	$	42,255	$	52,058	$	24,211	$	30,357	$	29	$	241,646
OAEM		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Substandard		0		0		132		1,113		9,092		5,262		0		15,599
Doubtful		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Total hotel/motel	$	15,859	$	76,877	$	42,387	$	53,171	$	33,303	$	35,619	$	29	$	257,245

Commercial real estate residential
Risk rating:
Pass/watch	$	32,631	$	47,427	$	34,918	$	22,779	$	29,690	$	59,271	$	10,720	$	237,436
OAEM		60		1,562		667		957		453		60		450		4,209
Substandard		2,124		2,210		2,283		4,166		1,198		3,783		108		15,872
Doubtful		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Total commercial real estate residential	$	34,815	$	51,199	$	37,868	$	27,902	$	31,341	$	63,114	$	11,278	$	257,517

Commercial real estate nonresidential
Risk rating:
Pass/watch	$	82,320	$	118,631	$	95,212	$	94,677	$	111,700	$	207,042	$	24,821	$	734,403
OAEM		0		511		70		2		0		3,327		20		3,930
Substandard		3,676		7,132		1,697		2,881		1,513		16,874		401		34,174
Doubtful		0		0		0		0		0		30		0		30
Total commercial real estate nonresidential	$	85,996	$	126,274	$	96,979	$	97,560	$	113,213	$	227,273	$	25,242	$	772,537

Dealer floorplans
Risk rating:
Pass/watch	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	62,909	$	62,909
OAEM		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Substandard		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Doubtful		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Total dealer floorplans	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	62,909	$	62,909

Commercial other
Risk rating:
Pass/watch	$	61,504	$	39,977	$	37,488	$	18,186	$	8,921	$	28,486	$	81,263	$	275,825
OAEM		0		0		5,129		250		477		26		0		5,882
Substandard		2,139		1,819		372		504		1,719		499		91		7,143
Doubtful		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Total commercial other	$	63,643	$	41,796	$	42,989	$	18,940	$	11,117	$	29,011	$	81,354	$	288,850

Commercial unsecured SBA PPP
Risk rating:
Pass/watch	$	266,951	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	266,951
OAEM		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Substandard		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Doubtful		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Total commercial unsecured SBA PPP	$	266,951	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	266,951

Commercial loans
Risk rating:
Pass/watch	$	459,265	$	282,912	$	209,873	$	187,700	$	174,522	$	325,156	$	179,742	$	1,819,170
OAEM		60		2,073		5,866		1,209		930		3,413		470		14,021
Substandard		7,939		11,161		4,484		8,664		13,522		26,418		600		72,788
Doubtful		0		0		0		0		0		30		0		30
Total commercial loans	$	467,264	$	296,146	$	220,223	$	197,573	$	188,974	$	355,017	$	180,812	$	1,906,009

(in thousands)	Commercial Construction		Commercial Secured by Real Estate		Equipment Leases		Commercial Other		Total
December 31, 2019
Pass	$	98,102	$	1,036,573	$	481	$	358,203	$	1,493,359
Watch		3,595		54,338		0		13,618		71,551
OAEM		254		27,964		0		6,065		34,283
Substandard		2,858		51,068		0		11,737		65,663
Doubtful		0		32		0		60		92
Total	$	104,809	$	1,169,975	$	481	$	389,683	$	1,664,948

The following tables present the credit risk profile of CTBI’s residential real estate and consumer loan portfolios based on performing or nonperforming status, segregated by ~~class, as of~~ ~~June 30, 2019~~ ~~and December 31, 2018:~~class:

(in thousands)
Real Estate
Construction

Real Estate
Mortgage
Home Equity
Consumer
Direct

Consumer
Indirect
Total
June 30, 2019
Performing $ 56,732 $ 713,268 $ 108,893 $ 145,109 $ 507,870 $ 1,531,872
Nonperforming (1) 285 9,305 938 40 218 10,786
Total $ 57,017 $ 722,573 $ 109,831 $ 145,149 $ 508,088 $ 1,542,658

December 31, 2018
Performing $ 57,132 $ 712,927 $ 105,576 $ 144,215 $ 533,221 $ 1,553,071
Nonperforming (1) 28 9,490 723 74 506 10,821
Total $ 57,160 $ 722,417 $ 106,299 $ 144,289 $ 533,727 $ 1,563,892

	Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
	2020		2019		2018		2017		2016		Prior		Revolving Loans		Total
Home equity lines
Performing	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	7	$	12,086	$	95,265	$	107,358
Nonperforming		0		0		0		0		0		757		416		1,173
Total home equity lines	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	7	$	12,843	$	95,681	$	108,531

Mortgage loans
Performing	$	85,015	$	148,158	$	78,460	$	78,334	$	62,805	$	318,424	$	0	$	771,196
Nonperforming		0		418		448		400		409		7,761		0		9,436
Total mortgage loans	$	85,015	$	148,576	$	78,908	$	78,734	$	63,214	$	326,185	$	0	$	780,632

Residential loans
Performing	$	85,015	$	148,158	$	78,460	$	78,334	$	62,812	$	330,510	$	95,265	$	878,554
Nonperforming		0		418		448		400		409		8,518		416		10,609
Total residential loans	$	85,015	$	148,576	$	78,908	$	78,734	$	63,221	$	339,028	$	95,681	$	889,163

Consumer direct loans
Performing	$	37,707	$	46,038	$	26,068	$	12,897	$	8,888	$	15,314	$	0	$	146,912
Nonperforming		0		15		3		0		0		354		0		372
Total consumer direct loans	$	37,707	$	46,053	$	26,071	$	12,897	$	8,888	$	15,668	$	0	$	147,284

Consumer indirect loans
Performing	$	181,015	$	164,703	$	129,347	$	69,555	$	35,154	$	16,019	$	0	$	595,793
Nonperforming		0		217		170		74		21		39		0		521
Total consumer indirect loans	$	181,015	$	164,920	$	129,517	$	69,629	$	35,175	$	16,058	$	0	$	596,314

Consumer loans
Performing	$	218,722	$	210,741	$	155,415	$	82,452	$	44,042	$	31,333	$	0	$	742,705
Nonperforming		0		232		173		74		21		393		0		893
Total consumer loans	$	218,722	$	210,973	$	155,588	$	82,526	$	44,063	$	31,726	$	0	$	743,598

(in thousands)	Real Estate Construction		Real Estate Mortgage		Home Equity		Consumer Direct		Consumer Indirect		Total
December 31, 2019
Performing	$	62,716	$	721,094	$	110,834	$	147,954	$	526,970	$	1,569,568
Nonperforming		634		11,909		1,060		97		448		14,148
Total	$	63,350	$	733,003	$	111,894	$	148,051	$	527,418	$	1,583,716

~~(1)~~ A loan is considered nonperforming if it is 90 days or more past due and/or on nonaccrual.

The total of consumer mortgage loans secured by real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process totaled ~~$2.9~~$2.4 million at June 30, ~~2019~~ ~~compared to $3.3 million at~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

~~A loan is considered impaired, in~~In accordance with ASC 326-20-30-2, if a loan does not share risk characteristics with other pooled loans in determining the ~~impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16), when based~~allowance for credit losses, the loan shall be evaluated for expected credit losses on ~~current information~~an individual basis. Of the loans that CTBI has individually evaluated, the loans listed below by segment are those that are collateral dependent:

	June 30, 2020
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Recorded Investment		Specific Reserve
Hotel/motel		3	$	14,861	$	250
Commercial real estate residential		3		6,398		0
Commercial real estate nonresidential		11		22,567		200
Commercial other		3		7,440		0
Total collateral dependent loans		20	$	51,266	$	450

The hotel/motel, commercial real estate residential, and ~~events, it is probable CTBI will be unable to collect~~commercial real estate nonresidential segments are all ~~amounts due from~~collateralized with real estate. The 3 loans listed in the ~~borrower in accordance~~commercial other segment are collateralized by various chattel and real estate collateral with ~~the contractual terms~~$5.1 million collateralized by a leasehold mortgage and assignment of lease on commercial property as well as furniture, fixtures, and equipment of the loan. Impaired loans include nonperforming commercial loans but also include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. These concessions could include a reduction inleasehold property and the ~~interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions intended to maximize collection.~~remaining $2.3 million collateralized by underground coal mining equipment and junior real estate liens.

The following table presents impaired loans, the average investment in impaired loans, and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the periods ended June 30, 2019, December 31, 2018, and June 30, 2018:

	December 31, 2019
(in thousands)	Recorded Balance		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Specific Allowance		Average Investment in Impaired Loans		*Interest Income Recognized
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction	$	2,836	$	2,837	$	0	$	3,234	$	170
Commercial secured by real estate		40,346		41,557		0		36,976		1,601
Commercial other		7,829		9,489		0		9,889		460
Real estate mortgage		2,309		2,309		0		2,385		85

Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction		174		174		99		215		11
Commercial secured by real estate		1,033		2,176		227		1,678		15
Commercial other		3,244		3,244		886		1,323		29

Totals:
Commercial construction		3,010		3,011		99		3,449		181
Commercial secured by real estate		41,379		43,733		227		38,654		1,616
Commercial other		11,073		12,733		886		11,212		489
Real estate mortgage		2,309		2,309		0		2,385		85
Total	$	57,771	$	61,786	$	1,212	$	55,700	$	2,371

	June 30, 2019
(in thousands)	Recorded Balance		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Specific Allowance
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction	$	3,313	$	3,383	$	0
Commercial secured by real estate		35,043		36,740		0
Commercial other		10,992		13,249		0
Real estate mortgage		2,570		2,570		0

Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction		174		174		99
Commercial secured by real estate		1,985		3,473		594
Commercial other		516		516		182

Totals:
Commercial construction		3,487		3,557		99
Commercial secured by real estate		37,028		40,213		594
Commercial other		11,508		13,765		182
Real estate mortgage		2,570		2,570		0
Total	$	54,593	$	60,105	$	875

Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019

Six Months Ended
June 30, 2019

(in thousands)
Average
Investment
in Impaired
Loans

*Interest
Income
Recognized

Average
Investment
in Impaired
Loans

*Interest
Income
Recognized

Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction $ 3,419 $ 49 $ 3,537 $ 95
Commercial secured by real estate 35,259 403 34,035 750
Commercial other 11,546 149 10,206 288
Real estate mortgage 2,572 22 2,451 41

Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction 189 3 257 6
Commercial secured by real estate 2,314 5 2,140 15
Commercial other 514 6 842 23

Totals:
Commercial construction 3,608 52 3,794 101
Commercial secured by real estate 37,573 408 36,175 765
Commercial other 12,060 155 11,048 311
Real estate mortgage 2,572 22 2,451 41
Total $ 55,813 $ 637 $ 53,468 $ 1,218

											Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	December 31, 2018										June 30, 2019				June 30, 2019
(in thousands)	Recorded Balance		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Specific Allowance		Average Investment in Impaired Loans		*Interest Income Recognized		Average Investment in Impaired Loans		*Interest Income Recognized		Average Investment in Impaired Loans		*Interest Income Recognized
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction	$	4,100	$	4,100	$	0	$	3,923	$	171	$	3,419	$	49	$	3,537	$	95
Commercial secured by real estate		29,645		31,409		0		30,250		1,412		35,259		403		34,035		750
Commercial other		8,285		9,982		0		8,774		530		11,546		149		10,206		288
Real estate construction		0		0		0		106		0
Real estate mortgage		1,882		1,882		0		1,666		41		2,572		22		2,451		41

Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction		127		127		50		42		0		189		3		257		6
Commercial secured by real estate		1,854		2,983		605		2,051		1		2,314		5		2,140		15
Commercial other		473		473		146		285		16		514		6		842		23

Totals:
Commercial construction		4,227		4,227		50		3,965		171		3,608		52		3,794		101
Commercial secured by real estate		31,499		34,392		605		32,301		1,413		37,573		408		36,175		765
Commercial other		8,758		10,455		146		9,059		546		12,060		155		11,048		311
Real estate construction		0		0		0		106		0
Real estate mortgage		1,882		1,882		0		1,666		41		2,572		22		2,451		41
Total	$	46,366	$	50,956	$	801	$	47,097	$	2,171	$	55,813	$	637	$	53,468	$	1,218

June 30, 2018
(in thousands)
Recorded
Balance

Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance

Specific
Allowance

Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction $ 4,299 $ 4,299 $ 0
Commercial secured by real estate 29,718 31,653 0
Commercial other 8,606 10,250 0
Real estate mortgage 1,621 1,621 0

Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial secured by real estate 2,156 3,277 807
Commercial other 343 343 100

Totals:
Commercial construction 4,299 4,299 0
Commercial secured by real estate 31,874 34,930 807
Commercial other 8,949 10,593 100
Real estate mortgage 1,621 1,621 0
Total $ 46,743 $ 51,443 $ 907

Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018

Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018

(in thousands)
Average
Investment
in Impaired
Loans

*Interest
Income
Recognized

Average
Investment
in Impaired
Loans

*Interest
Income
Recognized

Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction $ 4,353 $ 69 $ 4,261 $ 106
Commercial secured by real estate 29,982 372 30,774 724
Commercial other 8,722 128 9,027 280
Real estate construction 0 0 159 0
Real estate mortgage 1,621 11 1,453 11

Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial secured by real estate 2,199 1 2,166 1
Commercial other 321 4 161 4

Totals:
Commercial construction 4,353 69 4,261 106
Commercial secured by real estate 32,181 373 32,940 725
Commercial other 9,043 132 9,188 284
Real estate construction 0 0 159 0
Real estate mortgage 1,621 11 1,453 11
Total $ 47,198 $ 585 $ 48,001 $ 1,126

*Cash basis interest is substantially the same as interest income recognized.

Included in certain loan categories of impaired loans are certain loans and leases that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring, where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions. Modifications of terms for our loans and their inclusion as troubled debt restructurings are based on individual facts and circumstances. Loan modifications that are included as troubled debt restructurings may involve either an increase or reduction of the interest rate, extension of the term of the loan, or deferral of principal and/or interest payments, regardless of the period of the modification. All of the loans identified as troubled debt restructuring were modified due to financial stress of the borrower. In order to determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed to determine the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification. This evaluation is performed under CTBI’s internal underwriting policy.

When we modify loans and leases in a troubled debt restructuring, we evaluate any possible impairment similar to other impaired loans based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan or lease agreement, or use the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs for collateral dependent loans. If we determined that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance. In periods subsequent to modification, we evaluate all troubled debt restructuring, including those that have payment defaults, for possible impairment and recognize impairment through the allowance.

During ~~2019,~~ the second quarter of 2020,certain loans were modified in troubled debt restructurings, where economic concessions were granted to borrowers consisting of reductions in the interest rates, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, and forbearances. Presented below, segregated by class of loans, are troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 and the year ended December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019										Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Term Modification		Rate Modification		Combination		Post- Modification Outstanding Balance
Commercial:
Commercial secured by real estate		5	$	3,686	$	0	$	37	$	3,723
											Pre-Modification Outstanding Balance
(in thousands)											Number of Loans		Term Modification		Combination		Total Modification
Commercial real estate residential												3	$	196	$	1,809	$	2,005
Commercial real estate nonresidential												3		419		510		929
Commercial other		4		138		0		0		138		4		115		25		140
Residential:
Total commercial loans												10		730		2,344		3,074

Real estate mortgage		1		0		0		243		243		1		545		0		545
Total residential loans												1		545		0		545

Total troubled debt restructurings		10	$	3,824	$	0	$	280	$	4,104		11	$	1,275	$	2,344	$	3,619

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
	Post-Modification Outstanding Balance
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Term Modification		Combination		Total Modification
Commercial real estate residential		3	$	196	$	1,809	$	2,005
Commercial real estate nonresidential		3		419		510		929
Commercial other		4		114		25		139
Total commercial loans		10		729		2,344		3,073

Real estate mortgage		1		533		0		533
Total residential loans		1		533		0		533

Total troubled debt restructurings		11	$	1,262	$	2,344	$	3,606

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
	Pre-Modification Outstanding Balance
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Term Modification		Combination		Total Modification
Commercial real estate residential		11	$	4,593	$	1,809	$	6,402
Commercial real estate nonresidential		12		2,764		510		3,274
Commercial other		9		579		25		604
Total commercial loans		32		7,936		2,344		10,280

Real estate mortgage		2		933		0		933
Total residential loans		2		933		0		933

Total troubled debt restructurings		34	$	8,869	$	2,344	$	11,213

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
	Post-Modification Outstanding Balance
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Term Modification		Combination		Total Modification
Commercial real estate residential		11	$	4,595	$	1,809	$	6,404
Commercial real estate nonresidential		12		2,755		510		3,265
Commercial other		9		513		25		538
Total commercial loans		32		7,863		2,344		10,207

Real estate mortgage		2		921		0		921
Total residential loans		2		921		0		921

Total troubled debt restructurings		34	$	8,784	$	2,344	$	11,128

	Year Ended December 31, 2019
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Term Modification		Rate Modification		Combination		Post- Modification Outstanding Balance
Commercial:
Commercial secured by real estate		17	$	6,105	$	0	$	679	$	6,784
Commercial other		17		1,565		0		264		1,829
Residential:
Real estate mortgage		1		463		0		0		463
Total troubled debt restructurings		35	$	8,133	$	0	$	943	$	9,076

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Term Modification		Rate Modification		Combination		Post- Modification Outstanding Balance
Commercial:
Commercial secured by real estate		5	$	3,686	$	0	$	37	$	3,723
Commercial other		4		138		0		0		138
Residential:
Real estate mortgage		1		0		0		243		243
Total troubled debt restructurings		10	$	3,824	$	0	$	280	$	4,104

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Term Modification		Rate Modification		Combination		Post- Modification Outstanding Balance
Commercial:
Commercial secured by real estate		10	$	4,514	$	0	$	679	$	5,193
Commercial other		11		1,260		0		140		1,400
Residential:
Real estate mortgage		2		463		0		243		706
Total troubled debt restructurings		23	$	6,237	$	0	$	1,062	$	7,299

Year Ended
December 31, 2018

(in thousands)
Number of
Loans

Term
Modification

Rate
Modification
Combination
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Balance

Commercial:
Commercial construction 5 $ 2,182 $ 0 $ 15 $ 2,197
Commercial secured by real estate 24 4,004 0 1,383 5,387
Commercial other 8 465 0 0 465
Residential:
Real estate construction 0 0 0 0 0
Real estate mortgage 3 264 0 704 968
Total troubled debt restructurings 40 $ 6,915 $ 0 $ 2,102 $ 9,017

Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018

(in thousands)
Number of
Loans

Term
Modification

Rate
Modification
Combination
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Balance

Commercial:
Commercial construction 2 $ 411 $ 0 $ 0 $ 411
Commercial secured by real estate 8 1,773 0 0 1,773
Commercial other 3 283 0 0 283
Total troubled debt restructurings 13 $ 2,467 $ 0 $ 0 $ 2,467

Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018

(in thousands)
Number of
Loans

Term
Modification

Rate
Modification
Combination
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Balance

Commercial:
Commercial construction 4 $ 443 $ 0 $ 15 $ 458
Commercial secured by real estate 17 2,559 0 983 3,542
Commercial other 8 465 0 0 465
Total troubled debt restructurings 29 $ 3,467 $ 0 $ 998 $ 4,465

No charge-offs have resulted from modifications for any of the presented periods. We had nocommitments to extend additional credit in the amount of $83 thousand and $82 thousand at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, on loans that were considered troubled debt restructurings.

Loans retain their accrual status at the time of their modification. As a result, if a loan is on nonaccrual at the time it is modified, it stays as nonaccrual, and if a loan is on accrual at the time of the modification, it generally stays on accrual. Commercial and consumer loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future default. If loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring subsequently default, CTBI evaluates the loan for possible further impairment. The allowance for loan losses may be increased, adjustments may be made in the allocation of the allowance, or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan. Presented below, segregated by class of loans, are loans that were modified as troubled debt restructurings within the past twelve months which have subsequently defaulted. CTBI considers a loan in default when it is 90 days or more past due or transferred to nonaccrual. Presented below, segregated by segment, are troubled debt restructurings for which there was a payment default during the periods indicated and such default was within twelve months of the loan modification.

(in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019				Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
(in thousands)									Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
	Number of Loans		Recorded Balance		Number of Loans		Recorded Balance		Number of Loans		Recorded Balance
Commercial:
Commercial secured by real estate		0	$	0		1	$	17
Commercial real estate residential										1	$	67
Commercial other		0		0		1		25		1		95
Total defaulted restructured loans		0	$	0		2	$	42		2	$	162

(in thousands)	Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
	Number of Loans		Recorded Balance
Commercial:
Commercial real estate residential		1	$	67
Commercial other		3		368
Total defaulted restructured loans		4	$	435

(in thousands)
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2019

Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018

Number of
Loans

Recorded
Balance

Number of
Loans

Recorded
Balance

Commercial:
Commercial secured by real estate 0 $ 0 1 $ 17
Commercial other 0 0 1 25
Total defaulted restructured loans 0 $ 0 2 $ 42

~~Note 5 – Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses~~

The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) and the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio segment and impairment method as of June 30, 2019, December 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018:

Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019

(in thousands)
Commercial
Construction

Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate

Equipment
Lease
Financing

Commercial
Other

Real Estate
Construction

Real Estate
Mortgage

Home
Equity

Consumer
Direct

Consumer
Indirect
Total
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance $ 903 $ 14,800 $ 10 $ 5,217 $ 396 $ 4,053 $ 901 $ 1,635 $ 7,089 $ 35,004
Provision charged to expense (36 ) 533 (3 ) 238 (38 ) 299 65 400 105 1,563
Losses charged off (71 ) (345 ) 0 (824 ) 0 (180 ) (34 ) (331 ) (1,012 ) (2,797 )
Recoveries 3 110 0 258 0 15 1 63 778 1,228
Ending balance $ 799 $ 15,098 $ 7 $ 4,889 $ 358 $ 4,187 $ 933 $ 1,767 $ 6,960 $ 34,998

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 99 $ 594 $ 0 $ 182 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 875
Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 700 $ 14,504 $ 7 $ 4,707 $ 358 $ 4,187 $ 933 $ 1,767 $ 6,960 $ 34,123

Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 3,487 $ 37,028 $ 0 $ 11,508 $ 0 $ 2,570 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 54,593
Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 62,284 $ 1,155,740 $ 962 $ 378,540 $ 57,017 $ 720,003 $ 109,831 $ 145,149 $ 508,088 $ 3,137,614

Six Months Ended
June 30, 2019

(in thousands)
Commercial
Construction

Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate

Equipment
Lease
Financing

Commercial
Other

Real Estate
Construction

Real Estate
Mortgage

Home
Equity

Consumer
Direct

Consumer
Indirect
Total
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance $ 862 $ 14,531 $ 12 $ 4,993 $ 512 $ 4,433 $ 841 $ 1,883 $ 7,841 $ 35,908
Provision charged to expense 2 821 (5 ) 619 (154 ) 21 150 281 18 1,753
Losses charged off (71 ) (380 ) 0 (1,065 ) 0 (300 ) (60 ) (577 ) (2,399 ) (4,852 )
Recoveries 6 126 0 342 0 33 2 180 1,500 2,189
Ending balance $ 799 $ 15,098 $ 7 $ 4,889 $ 358 $ 4,187 $ 933 $ 1,767 $ 6,960 $ 34,998

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 99 $ 594 $ 0 $ 182 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 875
Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 700 $ 14,504 $ 7 $ 4,707 $ 358 $ 4,187 $ 933 $ 1,767 $ 6,960 $ 34,123

Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 3,487 $ 37,028 $ 0 $ 11,508 $ 0 $ 2,570 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 54,593
Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 62,284 $ 1,155,740 $ 962 $ 378,540 $ 57,017 $ 720,003 $ 109,831 $ 145,149 $ 508,088 $ 3,137,614

December 31, 2018
(in thousands)
Commercial
Construction

Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate

Equipment
Lease
Financing

Commercial
Other

Real Estate
Construction

Real Estate
Mortgage

Home
Equity

Consumer
Direct

Consumer
Indirect
Total
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance $ 686 $ 14,509 $ 18 $ 5,039 $ 660 $ 5,688 $ 857 $ 1,863 $ 6,831 $ 36,151
Provision charged to expense 115 786 (6 ) 824 (115 ) (336 ) 39 572 4,288 6,167
Losses charged off 0 (988 ) 0 (1,513 ) (33 ) (1,004 ) (69 ) (997 ) (6,394 ) (10,998 )
Recoveries 61 224 0 643 0 85 14 445 3,116 4,588
Ending balance $ 862 $ 14,531 $ 12 $ 4,993 $ 512 $ 4,433 $ 841 $ 1,883 $ 7,841 $ 35,908

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 50 $ 605 $ 0 $ 146 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 801
Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 812 $ 13,926 $ 12 $ 4,847 $ 512 $ 4,433 $ 841 $ 1,883 $ 7,841 $ 35,107

Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 4,227 $ 31,499 $ 0 $ 8,758 $ 0 $ 1,882 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,366
Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 78,488 $ 1,151,594 $ 1,740 $ 368,440 $ 57,160 $ 720,535 $ 106,299 $ 144,289 $ 533,727 $ 3,162,272

Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018

(in thousands)
Commercial
Construction

Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate

Equipment
Lease
Financing

Commercial
Other

Real Estate
Construction

Real Estate
Mortgage

Home
Equity

Consumer
Direct

Consumer
Indirect
Total
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance $ 686 $ 14,133 $ 23 $ 4,229 $ 633 $ 5,936 $ 862 $ 1,798 $ 6,889 $ 35,189
Provision charged to expense 51 788 (6 ) 668 (11 ) (493 ) 22 264 646 1,929
Losses charged off 0 (266 ) 0 (322 ) (4 ) (222 ) (18 ) (276 ) (1,418 ) (2,526 )
Recoveries 3 3 0 62 0 13 0 124 974 1,179
Ending balance $ 740 $ 14,658 $ 17 $ 4,637 $ 618 $ 5,234 $ 866 $ 1,910 $ 7,091 $ 35,771

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 0 $ 807 $ 0 $ 100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 907
Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 740 $ 13,851 $ 17 $ 4,537 $ 618 $ 5,234 $ 866 $ 1,910 $ 7,091 $ 34,864

Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 4,299 $ 31,874 $ 0 $ 8,949 $ 0 $ 1,621 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,743
Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 76,897 $ 1,159,837 $ 2,354 $ 343,461 $ 64,817 $ 719,075 $ 102,432 $ 145,376 $ 508,050 $ 3,122,299

Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018

(in thousands)
Commercial
Construction

Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate

Equipment
Lease
Financing

Commercial
Other

Real Estate
Construction

Real Estate
Mortgage

Home
Equity

Consumer
Direct

Consumer
Indirect
Total
Allowance for loan losses
Beginning balance $ 686 $ 14,509 $ 18 $ 5,039 $ 660 $ 5,688 $ 857 $ 1,863 $ 6,831 $ 36,151
Provision charged to expense 37 597 (1 ) 16 (14 ) (58 ) 27 343 1,928 2,875
Losses charged off 0 (477 ) 0 (557 ) (28 ) (415 ) (19 ) (491 ) (3,516 ) (5,503 )
Recoveries 17 29 0 139 0 19 1 195 1,848 2,248
Ending balance $ 740 $ 14,658 $ 17 $ 4,637 $ 618 $ 5,234 $ 866 $ 1,910 $ 7,091 $ 35,771

Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 0 $ 807 $ 0 $ 100 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 907
Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 740 $ 13,851 $ 17 $ 4,537 $ 618 $ 5,234 $ 866 $ 1,910 $ 7,091 $ 34,864

Loans
Ending balance:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 4,299 $ 31,874 $ 0 $ 8,949 $ 0 $ 1,621 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 46,743
Collectively evaluated for impairment $ 76,897 $ 1,159,837 $ 2,354 $ 343,461 $ 64,817 $ 719,075 $ 102,432 $ 145,376 $ 508,050 $ 3,122,299

~~Note 6 – Leases~~

~~Effective January 1, 2019, CTBI adopted ASU No. 2016-02,~~ ~~Leases,~~ (Topic 842) and all subsequent ASUs that modified Topic 842. Based on leases outstanding at December 31, 2018, the impact of adoption was recording a lease liability of approximately $16.1 million, a right-of-use asset of approximately $15.5 million, and a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings of approximately $0.5 million, net of a $0.1 million adjustment to our deferred tax liability. CTBI has one finance lease for property but no material subleases or leasing arrangements for which it is the lessor of property or equipment.

CTBI has operating leases for banking and ATM locations. These leases have remaining lease terms of 1 year to 45 years, some of which include options to extend the leases for up to 5 years. We evaluated the original lease terms for each operating lease, some of which include options to extend the leases for up to 5 years, using hindsight. These options, some of which include variable costs related to rent escalations based on recent financial indices, such as the Consumer Price Index, where CTBI estimates future rent increases, are included in the calculation of the lease liability and right-of-use asset when management determines it is reasonably certain the option will be exercised. CTBI determines this on each lease by considering all relevant contract-based, asset-based, market-based, and entity-based economic factors. Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized at lease commencement based on the present value of the remaining lease payments using a discount rate that represents our incremental borrowing rate on a collateralized basis, over a similar term at the lease commencement date. Right-of-use assets are further adjusted for prepaid rent, lease incentives, and initial direct costs, if any.

~~The components of lease expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 were as follows:~~

(in thousands)
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019

Six Months Ended
June 30, 2019

Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assets – finance leases $ 9 $ 17
Interest on lease liabilities – finance leases 13 27
Total finance lease cost 22 44

Short-term lease cost 68 139
Operating lease cost 442 888

Sublease income 63 131

Total lease cost $ 469 $ 940

~~Supplemental cash flow information related to CTBI’s operating and finance leases for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 was as follows:~~

(in thousands)
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019

Six Months Ended
June 30, 2019

Finance lease – operating cash flows $ 13 $ 27
Finance lease – financing cash flows 4 7
Operating lease – operating cash flows (fixed payments) 407 848
Weighted average lease term – financing leases 26.5 years 26.92 years
Weighted average lease term – operating leases 14.17 years 14.34 years
Weighted average discount rate – financing leases 3.70 % 3.70 %
Weighted average discount rate – operating leases 3.26 % 3.00 %

~~Maturities of lease liabilities as of June 30, 2019 are as follows:~~

(in thousands) Operating Leases Finance Leases
2019 $ 813 $ 34
2020 1,647 67
2021 1,668 75
2022 1,654 75
2023 1,575 75
Thereafter 10,895 2,060
Total lease payments 18,252 2,386
Less imputed interest (4,171 ) (923 )
Total $ 14,081 $ 1,463

~~At December 31, 2018, minimum non-cancellable rental payments were as follows:~~

(in thousands)
Operating Lease
Payments

2019 $ 1,999
2020 1,710
2021 1,737
2022 1,760
2023 1,696
Thereafter 13,031
Total $ 21,933

Note 75 – Other Real Estate Owned

Activity for other real estate owned was as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30						Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
(in thousands)	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
Beginning balance of other real estate owned	$	24,970		$	32,004		$	27,273		$	31,996		$	19,816		$	24,970		$	19,480		$	27,273
New assets acquired		388			1,559			1,242			2,843			237			388			1,862			1,242
Fair value adjustments		(692	)		(853	)		(1,139	)		(1,320	)		(306	)		(692	)		(764	)		(1,139	)
Sale of assets		(2,130	)		(2,448	)		(4,840	)		(3,257	)		(2,072	)		(2,130	)		(2,903	)		(4,840	)
Ending balance of other real estate owned	$	22,536		$	30,262		$	22,536		$	30,262		$	17,675		$	22,536		$	17,675		$	22,536

Carrying costs and fair value adjustments associated with foreclosed properties for the three months ended June30, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ were ~~$1.0~~$0.6 million and ~~$1.3~~$1.0 million, respectively. Carrying costs and fair value adjustments associated with foreclosed properties for the six months ended June30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 were $~~1.8~~1.5 million and $~~2.3~~1.8 million, respectively. See ~~note~~Note 1 for a description of our accounting policies relative to foreclosed properties and other real estate owned.

The major classifications of foreclosed properties are shown in the following table:

(in thousands)	June 30 2019		December 31 2018		June 30 2020		December 31 2019
1-4 family	$	3,273	$	5,253	$	2,868	$	3,630
Agricultural/farmland		0		0
Construction/land development/other		13,495		15,017		10,068		10,211
Multifamily		88		88		88		88
Non-farm/non-residential		5,680		6,915		4,651		5,551
Total foreclosed properties	$	22,536	$	27,273	$	17,675	$	19,480

Note 86 – Repurchase Agreements

We utilize securities sold under agreements to repurchase to facilitate the needs of our customers and provide additional funding to our balance sheet. Repurchase agreements are transactions whereby we offer to sell to a counterparty an undivided interest in an eligible security at an agreed upon purchase price, and which obligates CTBI to repurchase the security on an agreed upon date at an agreed upon repurchase price plus interest at an agreed upon rate. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are recorded at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction and are reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

We monitor collateral levels on a continuous basis and maintain records of each transaction specifically describing the applicable security and the counterparty’s fractional interest in that security, and we segregate the security from its general assets in accordance with regulations governing custodial holdings of securities. The primary risk with our repurchase agreements is market risk associated with the securities securing the transactions, as we may be required to provide additional collateral based on fair value changes of the underlying securities. Securities pledged as collateral under repurchase agreements are maintained with our safekeeping agents. The carrying value of investment securities available-for-sale pledged as collateral under repurchase agreements totaled ~~$275.1~~$317.1 million and ~~$285.2~~$264.9 million at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

The remaining contractual maturity of the securities sold under agreements to repurchase by class of collateral pledged included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 is presented in the following tables:

	June 30, 2019										June 30, 2020
	Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements										Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
(in thousands)	Overnight and Continuous		Up to 30 days		30-90 days		Greater Than 90 days		Total		Overnight and Continuous		Up to 30 days		30-90 days		Greater Than 90 days		Total
Repurchase agreements and repurchase-to-maturity transactions:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	16,713	$	7,584	$	19,766	$	33,000	$	77,063	$	16,928	$	1,723	$	12,540	$	23,848	$	55,039
State and political subdivisions		48,816		1,671		1,486		10,086		62,059		56,627		102		1,198		9,340		67,267
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		41,755		1,745		14,254		36,362		94,116		45,851		9,175		38,262		80,413		173,701
Total	$	107,284	$	11,000	$	35,506	$	79,448	$	233,238	$	119,406	$	11,000	$	52,000	$	113,601	$	296,007

	December 31, 2018										December 31, 2019
	Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements										Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements
(in thousands)	Overnight and Continuous		Up to 30 days		30-90 days		Greater Than 90 days		Total		Overnight and Continuous		Up to 30 days		30-90 days		Greater Than 90 days		Total
Repurchase agreements and repurchase-to-maturity transactions:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	25,346	$	0	$	2,548	$	60,699	$	88,593	$	15,001	$	0	$	3,479	$	58,953	$	77,433
State and political subdivisions		58,864		0		2,995		10,384		72,243		51,193		0		1,768		11,165		64,126
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		22,076		0		1,877		47,923		71,876		35,480		0		1,996		47,882		85,358
Total	$	106,286	$	0	$	7,420	$	119,006	$	232,712	$	101,674	$	0	$	7,243	$	118,000	$	226,917

Note 97 – Fair Market Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. Fair value measurements must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. In this standard, the FASB clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the exit price when pricing the asset or liability. In support of this principle, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1 Inputs – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in determining an exit price for the assets or liabilities.

Recurring Measurements

The following tables present the fair value measurements of assets recognized in the accompanying balance sheets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 and indicate the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.

			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2019 Using								Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2020 Using
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets measured – recurring basis
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	150,742	$	35,668	$	115,074	$	0	$	89,432	$	3,498	$	85,934	$	0
State and political subdivisions		105,439		0		105,439		0		125,918		0		125,918		0
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		333,005		0		333,005		0		469,955		0		469,955		0
Other debt securities		2,400		0		2,400		0		55,174		0		55,174		0
Equity securities at fair value		1,727		0		0		1,727		2,094		0		0		2,094
Mortgage servicing rights		3,119		0		0		3,119		2,518		0		0		2,518

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018 Using								Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets measured – recurring basis
Available-for-sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies	$	217,938	$	91,028	$	126,910	$	0	$	171,150	$	54,263	$	116,887	$	0
State and political subdivisions		124,488		0		124,488		0		102,307		0		102,307		0
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities		250,819		0		250,819		0		295,245		0		295,245		0
Other debt securities		501		0		501		0		31,142		0		31,142		0
Equity securities at fair value		1,173		0		0		1,173		1,953		0		0		1,953
Mortgage servicing rights		3,607		0		0		3,607		3,263		0		0		3,263

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy. These valuation methodologies were applied to all of CTBI’s financial assets carried at fair value. CTBI had no liabilities measured and recorded at fair value as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. There have been no significant changes in the valuation techniques during the quarter ~~or six months~~ ended June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. For assets classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the process used to develop the reported fair value is described below.

Available-for-Sale Securities

Securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value on a recurring basis. U.S. Treasury and government agencies are classified as Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy where quoted market prices are available in the active market on which the individual securities are traded.

If quoted market prices are not available, CTBI obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service, such as Interactive Data, which utilizes pricing models to determine fair value measurement. CTBI reviews the pricing quarterly to verify the reasonableness of the pricing. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other factors. U.S. Treasury and government agencies, state and political subdivisions, U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, and other debt securities are classified as Level 2 inputs.

In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. Fair value determinations for Level 3 measurements are estimated on a quarterly basis where assumptions used are reviewed to ensure the estimated fair value complies with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States.

Equity Securities at Fair Value

As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the only securities owned by CTBI that were valued using Level 3 criteria are Visa Class B Stock (included in equity securities at fair value). ~~In determining fair~~Fair value for Visa Class B Stock ~~CTBI utilizes the expertise of~~is determined by an independent third ~~party. Accordingly, fair value is determined by the independent third~~ party ~~using an income approach by~~ utilizing assumptions about factors such as quarterly common stock dividend payments, the conversion of the securities to the relevant Class A Stock shares subject to the prevailing conversion rate and conversion date. We have reviewed the assumptions, processes, and conclusions of the third party provider. We have determined these assumptions, processes, and conclusions to be reasonable and appropriate in determining the fair value of this asset. See the table below for inputs and valuation techniques used for Level 3 equity securities.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. CTBI reports mortgage servicing rights at fair value on a recurring basis with subsequent remeasurement of MSRs based on change in fair value.

In determining fair value, CTBI utilizes the expertise of an independent third party. Accordingly, fair value is determined by the independent third party by utilizing assumptions about factors such as mortgage interest rates, discount rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds, market trends and industry demand. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, mortgage servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. Fair value determinations for Level 3 measurements of mortgage servicing rights are tested for impairment on a quarterly basis where assumptions used are reviewed to ensure the estimated fair value complies with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States. We have reviewed the assumptions, processes, and conclusions of the third party provider. We have determined these assumptions, processes, and conclusions to be reasonable and appropriate in determining the fair value of this asset. See the table below for inputs and valuation techniques used for Level 3 mortgage servicing rights.

~~Transfers between Levels~~

~~There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3 as of June 30, 2019.~~

Level 3 Reconciliation

Following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of recurring fair value measurements, ~~recognized in~~for the ~~accompanying balance sheet~~periods indicated, using significant unobservable (Level 3) ~~inputs~~ ~~for the~~ ~~three~~ ~~and~~ ~~six~~ ~~months ended June~~ ~~30,2019~~ ~~and~~ ~~2018~~:inputs:

(in thousands)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019					Three Months Ended June 30, 2018					Three Months Ended June 30, 2020					Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
	Equity Securities at Fair Value		Mortgage Servicing Rights			Equity Securities at Fair Value		Mortgage Servicing Rights			Equity Securities at Fair Value		Mortgage Servicing Rights			Equity Securities at Fair Value		Mortgage Servicing Rights
Beginning balance	$	1,528	$	3,390		$	0	$	3,706		$	1,721	$	2,481		$	1,528	$	3,390
Total unrealized gains (losses)
Included in net income		199		(348	)		0		68
Total unrealized gains (losses) Included in net income												373		(148	)		199		(348	)
Issues		0		191			0		111			0		415			0		191
Settlements		0		(114	)		0		(113	)		0		(230	)		0		(114	)
Ending balance	$	1,727	$	3,119		$	0	$	3,772		$	2,094	$	2,518		$	1,727	$	3,119

Total gains (losses) for the period included in net income attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the reporting date	$	199	$	(348	)	$	0	$	68		$	373	$	(148	)	$	199	$	(348	)

(in thousands)	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019					Six Months Ended June 30, 2018					Six Months Ended June 30, 2020					Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
	Equity Securities at Fair Value		Mortgage Servicing Rights			Equity Securities at Fair Value		Mortgage Servicing Rights			Equity Securities at Fair Value		Mortgage Servicing Rights			Equity Securities at Fair Value		Mortgage Servicing Rights
Beginning balance	$	1,173	$	3,607		$	0	$	3,484		$	1,953	$	3,263		$	1,173	$	3,607
Total unrealized gains (losses)
Included in net income		554		(582	)		0		296
Total unrealized gains (losses) Included in net income												141		(966	)		554		(582	)
Issues		0		307			0		211			0		560			0		307
Settlements		0		(213	)		0		(219	)		0		(339	)		0		(213	)
Ending balance	$	1,727	$	3,119		$	0	$	3,772		$	2,094	$	2,518		$	1,727	$	3,119

Total gains (losses) for the period included in net income attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the reporting date	$	554	$	(582	)	$	0	$	296		$	141	$	(966	)	$	554	$	(582	)

Realized and unrealized gains and losses for items reflected in the table above are included in net income in the consolidated statements of income as follows:

Noninterest Income
	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30					Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
(in thousands)	2019			2018			2019			2018		2020			2019			2020			2019
Total gains (losses)	$	(263	)	$	(45	)	$	(241	)	$	77
Total losses												$	(6	)	$	(263	)	$	(1,165	)	$	(241	)

Nonrecurring Measurements

The following tables present the fair value measurements of assets recognized in the accompanying balance sheets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 and indicate the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.

			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2019 Using								Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2020 Using
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets measured – nonrecurring basis
Impaired loans (collateral dependent)	$	1,343	$	0	$	0	$	1,343
Collateral dependent loans									$	3,030	$	0	$	0	$	3,030
Other real estate owned		2,271		0		0		2,271		1,692		0		0		1,692

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018 Using								Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using
(in thousands)	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets measured – nonrecurring basis
Impaired loans (collateral dependent)	$	747	$	0	$	0	$	747	$	3,217	$	0	$	0	$	3,217
Other real estate owned		6,500		0		0		6,500		12,593		0		0		12,593

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheet, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy. For assets classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the process used to develop the reported fair value is described below.

~~Impaired~~Collateral Dependent Loans ~~(Collateral Dependent)~~

The estimated fair value of collateral-dependent ~~impaired~~ loans is based on the appraised fair value of the collateral, less estimated cost to sell. Collateral-dependent ~~impaired~~ loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

CTBI considers the appraisal or evaluation as the starting point for determining fair value and then considers other factors and events in the environment that may affect the fair value. Appraisals of the collateral underlying collateral-dependent loans are obtained when the loan is determined to be collateral-dependent and subsequently as deemed necessary by the Chief Credit Officer. Appraisals are reviewed for accuracy and consistency by the Chief Credit Officer. Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management. The appraised values are reduced by discounts to consider lack of marketability and estimated cost to sell if repayment or satisfaction of the loan is dependent on the sale of the collateral. These discounts and estimates are developed by the Chief Credit Officer by comparison to historical results.

Loans considered ~~impaired under ASC 310-35,~~ ~~Impairment of a Loan,~~collateral dependent are loans for which ~~based on current information and events, it~~the repayment is ~~probable that~~expected to be provided substantially through the creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect subsequent (i) partial write-downs that are based on the observable market priceoperation or ~~current appraised value~~sale of the collateral ~~or (ii)~~when the ~~full charge-off of the loan carrying value.~~borrower is experiencing financial difficulty in accordance with ASC 326-20-35-5. Quarter-to-date fair value adjustments on ~~impaired~~collateral dependent loans disclosed above were ~~$0.2~~$0.9 million, $0.4 million, and $0.2 million for the ~~quarter~~quarters ended June 30, 2020, December 31, 2019, and June 30, 2019, respectively. Year-to-date adjustments were $1.4 million, $0.7 million, and $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, the year ended December 31, 2019, and the six months ended June 30, 2019, ~~$0.3 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2018,~~ ~~and~~ respectively.~~$0.2 million~~ ~~for the quarter ended June~~ ~~30,2018.~~ ~~Year-to-date fair value adjustments were~~ ~~$0.5 million~~ ~~for the~~ ~~six~~ ~~months ended June~~ ~~30,2019,$0.3 million~~ ~~for the year ended December~~ ~~31,2018,~~ ~~and~~ ~~$0.2 million~~ ~~for the~~ ~~six~~ ~~months ended June~~ ~~30,2018.~~

Other Real Estate Owned

In accordance with the provisions of ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, other real estate owned (“OREO”) is carried at the lower of fair value at acquisition date or current estimated fair value, less estimated cost to sell when the real estate is acquired. Estimated fair value of OREO is based on appraisals or evaluations. OREO is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Long-lived assets are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect subsequent partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral. Quarter-to-date fair value adjustments on other real estate owned disclosed above were ~~$0.6~~$0.2 million, ~~$0.4~~$0.7 million, and ~~$0.8~~$0.6 million for the quarters ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, and June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Year-to-date adjustments were $~~$1.0~~0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020, $~~30,~~3.2 ~~2019,$1.8~~ million for the year ended December 31, 2019, and $~~31,~~1.0 ~~2018,~~ ~~and~~ ~~$1.2~~ million for the six months ended June 30, 2019.~~30,2018.~~

Our policy for determining the frequency of periodic reviews is based upon consideration of the specific properties and the known or perceived market fluctuations in a particular market and is typically between 12 and 18 months but generally not more than 24 months. Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.

Unobservable (Level 3) Inputs

The following tables present quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in recurring and nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

(in thousands)	Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
	Fair Value at June 30, ~~2019~~2020	Valuation Technique(s)	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Equity securities at fair value	$~~1,727~~2,094	Discount cash flows, computer pricing model	Discount rate	8.0% - 12.0% (10.0%)
			Conversion date	Dec 2022 – Dec 2026 (Dec ~~2024)~~2024)

Mortgage servicing rights	$~~3,119~~2,518	Discount cash flows, computer pricing model	Constant prepayment rate	~~7.0%~~0.0%% - ~~23.6%~~28.5% ~~(12.9%~~(18.6%)
			Probability of default	0.0% - 100.0% ~~(2.1%~~(1.7%)
			Discount rate	10.0% - 11.5% (10.1%)

Collateral dependent loans	$3,030	Market comparable properties	Marketability discount	8.0% - 32.0% (21.0%)

Other real estate owned	$1,692	Market comparable properties	Comparability adjustments	10.0% - 46.4% (18.4%)

(in thousands)	Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
	Fair Value at December 31, 2019	Valuation Technique(s)	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Equity securities at fair value	$1,953	Discount cash flows, computer pricing model	Discount rate	8.0% - 12.0% (10.0%)
			Conversion date	Dec 2022 – Dec 2026 (Dec 2024)

Mortgage servicing rights	$3,263	Discount cash flows, computer pricing model	Constant prepayment rate	0.0% - 24.3% (11.7%)
			Probability of default	0.0% - 100.0% (2.7%)
			Discount rate	10.0% - 11.5% (10.1%)

Impaired loans (collateral-dependent)	$~~1,343~~3,217	Market comparable properties	Marketability discount	~~0.6%~~7.0% - ~~97.1%~~99.0% ~~(62.0%~~(46.0%)

Other real estate owned	$~~2,271~~	~~Market comparable properties~~	~~Comparability adjustments~~	~~10.0% - 34.4%~~ ~~(12.7%)~~

~~(in thousands)~~	~~Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements~~
	~~Fair Value at~~ ~~December 31, 2018~~	~~Valuation Technique(s)~~	~~Unobservable Input~~	~~Range~~ ~~(Weighted~~ ~~Average)~~
~~Equity securities at fair value~~	~~$1,173~~	~~Discount cash flows, computer pricing model~~	~~Discount rate~~	~~8.0% - 12.0%~~ ~~(10.0%)~~
			~~Conversion date~~	~~Dec 2022 – Dec 2026~~ ~~(Dec 2024)~~

~~Mortgage servicing rights~~	~~$3,607~~	~~Discount cash flows, computer pricing model~~	~~Constant prepayment rate~~	~~7.0% - 28.1%~~ ~~(9.5%)~~
			~~Probability of default~~	~~0.0% - 100.0%~~ ~~(2.6%)~~
			~~Discount rate~~	~~10.0% - 11.5%~~ ~~(10.1%)~~

~~Impaired loans (collateral-dependent)~~	~~$747~~	~~Market comparable properties~~	~~Marketability discount~~	~~0.0% - 95.1%~~ ~~(41.5%)~~

~~Other real estate owned~~	~~$6,500~~12,593	Market comparable properties	Comparability adjustments	6.0% - ~~47.6%~~29.8% ~~(14.9%~~(11.3%)

~~Sensitivity~~Uncertainty of ~~Significant Unobservable Inputs~~Fair Value Measurements

The following is a discussion of the ~~sensitivity~~uncertainty of ~~significant unobservable inputs,~~fair value measurements, the interrelationships between those inputs and other unobservable inputs used in recurring fair value measurement and of how those inputs might magnify or mitigate the effect of changes in the unobservable inputs on the fair value measurement.

Equity Securities at Fair Value

Fair market value for equity securities is derived based on unobservable inputs, such as the discount rate, quarterly dividend payments payable to the Visa Class B common stock and the prevailing conversion rate at the conversion date. The most recent conversion rate of ~~1.6298~~1.6228 and the most recent dividend rate of ~~0.4074~~0.4868 were used to derive the fair value estimate. Significant increases (decreases) in either of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the assumption used for discount rate is accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the fair value estimate.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

Fair market value for mortgage servicing rights is derived based on unobservable inputs, such as prepayment speeds of the underlying loans generated using the Andrew Davidson Prepayment Model, FHLMC/FNMA guidelines, the weighted average life of the loan, the discount rate, the weighted average coupon, and the weighted average default rate. Significant increases (decreases) in either of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the assumption used for prepayment speeds is accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the assumption for interest rates.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table presents estimated fair value of CTBI’s financial instruments as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques. In accordance with the ~~prospective~~ adoption of ASU 2016-01, the fair values as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 were measured using an exit price notion.

			Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2019 Using								Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2020 Using
(in thousands)	Carrying Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Carrying Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	321,639	$	321,639	$	0	$	0	$	478,085	$	478,085	$	0	$	0
Certificates of deposit in other banks		245		0		245		0		245		0		245		0
Securities available-for-sale		591,586		35,668		555,918		0
Securities held-to-maturity		619		0		619		0
Debt securities available-for-sale										740,479		3,498		736,981		0
Equity securities at fair value		1,727		0		0		1,727		2,094		0		0		2,094
Loans held for sale		1,067		1,093		0		0		28,987		29,624		0		0
Loans, net		3,157,209		0		0		3,189,802		3,492,136		0		0		3,604,615
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		11,360		0		11,360		0		10,408		0		10,408		0
Federal Reserve Bank stock		4,887		0		4,887		0		4,887		0		4,887		0
Accrued interest receivable		14,923		0		14,923		0		14,858		0		14,858		0
Mortgage servicing rights		3,119		0		0		3,119		2,518		0		0		2,518

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	3,437,181	$	833,044	$	2,624,918	$	0	$	3,972,309	$	1,109,873	$	2,895,792	$	0
Repurchase agreements		233,238		0		0		233,245		296,007		0		0		295,923
Federal funds purchased		3,900		0		3,900		0		1,000		0		1,000		0
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		426		0		458		0		405		0		440		0
Long-term debt		59,341		0		0		44,166		57,841		0		0		49,382
Accrued interest payable		5,600		0		5,600		0		4,508		0		4,508		0

Unrecognized financial instruments:
Letters of credit	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Commitments to extend credit		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Forward sale commitments		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0

The following table presents estimated fair value of CTBI’s financial instruments as of December 31, ~~2018~~2019 and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.

			Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019 Using
(in thousands)	Carrying Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	264,683	$	264,683	$	0	$	0
Certificates of deposit in other banks		245		0		245		0
Debt securities available-for-sale		599,844		54,263		545,581		0
Debt securities held-to-maturity		517		0		517		0
Equity securities at fair value		1,953		0		0		1,953
Loans held for sale		1,167		1,191		0		0
Loans, net		3,213,568		0		0		3,283,876
Federal Home Loan Bank stock		10,474		0		10,474		0
Federal Reserve Bank stock		4,887		0		4,887		0
Accrued interest receivable		14,836		0		14,836		0
Mortgage servicing rights		3,263		0		0		3,263

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	3,405,572	$	865,760	$	2,560,271	$	0
Repurchase agreements		226,917		0		0		226,921
Federal funds purchased		7,906		0		7,906		0
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank		415		0		446		0
Long-term debt		57,841		0		0		49,382
Accrued interest payable		2,839		0		2,839		0

Unrecognized financial instruments:
Letters of credit	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0
Commitments to extend credit		0		0		0		0
Forward sale commitments		0		0		0		0

Note 8 – Revenue Recognition

CTBI’s primary source of revenue is interest income generated from loans and investment securities. Interest income is recognized according to the terms of the financial instrument agreement over the life of the loan or investment security unless it is determined that the counterparty is unable to continue making interest payments. Interest income also includes prepaid interest fees from commercial customers, which approximates the interest foregone on the balance of the loan prepaid.

CTBI's additional source of income, also referred to as noninterest income, includes service charges on deposit accounts, gains on sales of loans, trust and wealth management income, loan related fees, brokerage revenue, and other miscellaneous income and is largely based on contracts with customers. In these cases, CTBI recognizes revenue when it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control over a product or service to a customer. CTBI considers a customer to be any party to which we will provide goods or services that are an output of CTBI’s ordinary activities in exchange for consideration. There is little seasonality with regards to revenue from contracts with customers and all inter-company revenue is eliminated when CTBI’s financial statements are consolidated.

Generally, CTBI enters into contracts with customers that are short-term in nature where the performance obligations are fulfilled and payment is processed at the same time. Such examples include revenue related to merchant fees, interchange fees, and investment services income. In addition, revenue generated from existing customer relationships such as deposit accounts are also considered short-term in nature, because the relationship may be terminated at any time and payment is processed at the time performance obligations are fulfilled. As a result, CTBI does 0t have contract assets, contract liabilities, or related receivable accounts for contracts with customers. In cases where collectability is a concern, CTBI does not record revenue.

Fair Value Measurements
at December 31, 2018 Using

(in thousands)
Carrying
Amount

Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 141,450 $ 141,450 $ 0 $ 0
Certificates of deposit in other banks 3,920 0 3,914 0
Securities available-for-sale 593,746 91,028 502,718 0
Securities held-to-maturity 649 0 649 0
Equity securities at fair value 1,173 0 0 1,173
Loans held for sale 2,461 2,518 0 0
Loans, net 3,172,730 0 0 3,175,908
Federal Home Loan Bank stock 14,713 0 14,713 0
Federal Reserve Bank stock 4,887 0 4,887 0
Accrued interest receivable 14,432 0 14,432 0
Mortgage servicing rights 3,607 0 0 3,607

Financial liabilities:
Deposits $ 3,305,950 $ 803,316 $ 2,513,084 $ 0
Repurchase agreements 232,712 0 0 232,796
Federal funds purchased 1,180 0 1,180 0
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank 436 0 468 0
Long-term debt 59,341 0 0 44,166
Accrued interest payable 2,902 0 2,902 0

Unrecognized financial instruments:
Letters of credit $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Commitments to extend credit 0 0 0 0
Forward sale commitments 0 0 0 0

Generally, the pricing of transactions between CTBI and each customer is either (i) established within a legally enforceable contract between the two parties, as is the case with loan sales, or (ii) disclosed to the customer at a specific point in time, as is the case when a deposit account is opened or before a new loan is underwritten. Fees are usually fixed at a specific amount or as a percentage of a transaction amount. No judgment or estimates by management are required to record revenue related to these transactions and pricing is clearly identified within these contracts.

CTBI primarily operates in Kentucky and contiguous areas. Therefore, all significant operating decisions are based upon analysis of CTBI as 1 operating segment.

We disaggregate our revenue from contracts with customers by contract-type and timing of revenue recognition, as we believe it best depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of our revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. Noninterest income not generated from customers during CTBI’s ordinary activities primarily relates to mortgage servicing rights, gains/losses on the sale of investment securities, gains/losses on the sale of other real estate owned, gains/losses on the sale of property, plant and equipment, and income from bank owned life insurance.

For more information related to our components of noninterest income, see the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income above.

Note 109 – Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

	Three Months Ended June 30				Six Months Ended June 30				Three Months Ended June 30				Six Months Ended June 30
(in thousands except per share data)	2019		2018		2019		2018		2020		2019		2020		2019
Numerator:
Net income	$	18,324	$	11,599	$	33,263	$	27,413	$	19,652	$	18,324	$	26,231	$	33,263

Denominator:
Basic earnings per share:
Weighted average shares		17,721		17,687		17,717		17,679		17,739		17,721		17,746		17,717
Diluted earnings per share:
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock grants		12		16		11		16		3		12		7		11
Adjusted weighted average shares		17,733		17,703		17,728		17,695		17,742		17,733		17,753		17,728

Earnings per share:
Basic earnings per share	$	1.03	$	0.66	$	1.88	$	1.55	$	1.11	$	1.03	$	1.48	$	1.88
Diluted earnings per share		1.03		0.66		1.88		1.55		1.11		1.03		1.48		1.88

There were no0 options to purchase common shares that were excluded from the diluted calculations above for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. In addition to in-the-money stock options, unvested restricted stock grants were also used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share based on the treasury method.

Note 1110 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Unrealized gains on AFS securities

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) and the affected line items in the statements of income during the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 were:

	Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
	Three Months Ended June 30				Six Months Ended June 30				Amounts Reclassified from AOCI
(in thousands)	2019		2018		2019		2018		Three Months Ended June 30				Six Months Ended June 30
									2020		2019		2020		2019
Affected line item in the statements of income
Securities gains	$	5	$	2	$	6	$	151	$	564	$	5	$	1,045	$	6
Tax expense		1		0		2		32		147		1		272		2
Total reclassifications out of AOCI	$	4	$	2	$	4	$	119	$	417	$	4	$	773	$	4

Note 11 – COVID-19

We continue to work diligently with our customers as we all continue to battle COVID-19. At June 30, 2020, we had 3,668 COVID-19 loan deferrals totaling $756.6 million, consisting of 850 commercial loan deferrals totaling $639.4 million, 485 residential loan deferrals totaling $63.3 million, and 2,264 consumer loan deferrals totaling $44.6 million, in addition to 69 serviced loan deferrals, pursuant to Freddie Mac guidelines, totaling $9.3 million. We also had 50 customers who had previously received COVID-19 loan deferrals during the first quarter 2020 that have requested assistance for a second time. Those deferrals total $68.4 million, consisting of 30 commercial loans deferrals totaling $65.7 million, 18 residential loan deferrals totaling $2.2 million, and 2 serviced loan deferrals, pursuant to Freddie Mac guidelines, totaling $0.5 million. These loan deferrals and modifications have been executed consistent with the guidelines of the CARES Act. Pursuant to the CARES Act, these loan deferrals are not included in our nonperforming loans disclosed in Note 4 above. We have continued participating in the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) stemming from the CARES Act passed by Congress as a stimulus response to the potential economic impacts of COVID-19. As of June 30, 2020, we had 2,848 PPP loans authorized totaling $275.9 million. Of these, 2,703 were under $350 thousand, 132 were between $350 thousand and $2.0 million, and 13 were over $2.0 million. We have closed 2,782 of these loans for a total amount of $274.1 million.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and

Results of Operations

Overview

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand Community Trust Bancorp, Inc., our operations, and our present business environment. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to – and should be read in conjunction with – our condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes contained in this quarterly report. The MD&A includes the following sections:

❖	Our Business

❖	Results of Operations and Financial Condition

❖

Dividends

❖	Liquidity and Market Risk

❖	Interest Rate Risk

❖	Capital Resources

❖	Impact of Inflation, Changing Prices, and Economic Conditions

❖	Stock Repurchase Program

❖	Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our Business

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Pikeville, Kentucky. Currently, we own one commercial bank, Community Trust Bank, Inc. (“CTB”) and one trust company, Community Trust and Investment Company, Inc. (“CTIC”). Through our subsidiaries, we have seventy-nine banking locations in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky, southern West Virginia, and northeastern Tennessee, four trust offices across Kentucky, and one trust office in northeastern Tennessee. At June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we had total consolidated assets of ~~$4.4~~$5.0 billion and total consolidated deposits, including repurchase agreements, of ~~$3.7~~$4.3 billion. Total shareholders’ equity at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 was ~~$594.7~~$631.8 million. Trust assets under management, which are excluded from CTBI’s total consolidated assets, at June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, were ~~$2.1~~$2.3 billion. Trust assets under management include CTB’s investment portfolio totaling ~~$0.6~~$0.7 billion.

Through its subsidiaries, CTBI engages in a wide range of commercial and personal banking and trust and wealth management activities, which include accepting time and demand deposits; making secured and unsecured loans to corporations, individuals and others; providing cash management services to corporate and individual customers; issuing letters of credit; renting safe deposit boxes; and providing funds transfer services. The lending activities of CTB include making commercial, construction, mortgage, and personal loans. Lease-financing, lines of credit, revolving lines of credit, term loans, and other specialized loans, including asset-based financing, are also available. Our corporate subsidiaries act as trustees of personal trusts, as executors of estates, as trustees for employee benefit trusts, as paying agents for bond and stock issues, as investment agent, as depositories for securities, and as providers of full service brokerage and insurance services. For further information, see Item 1 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

COVID-19, the CARES Act, and Related Regulatory Actions

Impact of COVID-19

On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) announced that the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) constituted a public health emergency of international concern. On March 11, 2020, the WHO declared COVID-19 to be a global pandemic. The health concerns relating to the COVID-19 outbreak and related governmental actions taken to reduce the spread of the virus have significantly impacted the global economy (including the states and local economies in which we operate), disrupted supply chains, lowered equity market valuations, and created significant volatility and disruption in financial markets. The outbreak has resulted in authorities implementing numerous measures to try to contain the virus, such as travel bans and restrictions, quarantines, shelter in place or total lock-down orders, and business limitations and shutdowns. Such measures have significantly contributed to rising unemployment and negatively impacted consumer and business spending. As a result, the demand for CTBI’s products and services has been, and will continue to be, significantly impacted.

Interest Rates

On March 3, 2020, the Federal Open Market Committee reduced the target federal funds rate by 50 basis points to 1.00% to 1.25%. This rate was further reduced to a target range of 0% to 0.25% on March 16, 2020. These reductions in interest rates and other effects of the COVID-19 outbreak are likely to negatively impact CTBI’s net interest income and noninterest income.

The CARES Act and the Paycheck Protection Program

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) was signed into law, providing an approximately $2 trillion stimulus package that includes direct payments to individual taxpayers, economic stimulus to significantly impacted industry sectors, emergency funding for hospitals and providers, small business loans, increased unemployment benefits, and a variety of tax incentives.

For small businesses, eligible nonprofits and certain others, the CARES Act established a Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), which is administered by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”). On April 24, 2020, the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act was enacted. Among other things, this legislation amends the initial CARES Act program by raising the appropriation level for PPP loans from $349 billion to $670 billion. The PPP was further modified on June 5, 2020, with the adoption of the Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act (the “Flexibility Act”), which extended the maturity date for PPP loans from two years to five years for loans disbursed on or after the date of enactment of the Flexibility Act. For PPP loans disbursed prior to such enactment, the Flexibility Act permits the borrower and lender to mutually agree to extend the term of the loan to five years. CTB is actively participating in assisting its customers with applications for resources through the program. PPP loans earn interest at fixed rate of 1%. CTB anticipates that the majority of these loans will ultimately be forgiven by the SBA in accordance with the terms of the program. As of June 30, 2020, we had 2,848 PPP loans authorized totaling $275.9 million. Under the terms of the PPP program, the loans are fully guaranteed by the U.S. government.

Paycheck Protection Program Lending Facility

To provide liquidity to small business lenders and the broader credit markets, to help stabilize the financial system, and to provide economic relief to small businesses nationwide, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”) authorized each of the Federal Reserve Banks to participate in the Paycheck Protection Program Lending Facility (the “PPPL Facility”), pursuant to the Federal Reserve Act. Under the PPPL Facility, each of the Federal Reserve Banks will extend non-recourse loans to eligible financial institutions such as CTB to fund loans guaranteed by the SBA under the PPP. CTB has until September 30, 2020 to access funds under the PPPL Facility, unless otherwise extended by the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury.

Loan Modifications and Troubled Debt Restructurings

On April 7, 2020, the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC” and, together with the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC, the “federal banking regulators”) issued a revised Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions, which, among other things, encouraged financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers who are or may be unable to meet their contractual payment obligations because of the effects of COVID-19, and stated that institutions generally do not need to categorize COVID-19-related modifications as troubled debt restructurings as long as the loans were not 30 days past due at December 31, 2019 and that the agencies will not direct supervised institutions to automatically categorize all COVID-19 related loan modifications as troubled debt restructurings. See “Results of Operations and Financial Condition” of this MD&A for information relating to COVID-19 loan deferrals.

Regulatory Capital

Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) Methodology. On March 27, 2020, federal banking regulators issued an interim final rule that delays the estimated impact on regulatory capital stemming from the implementation of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) for a transition period of up to five years (the “CECL IFR”). The CECL IFR provides banking organizations that are required (as of January 1, 2020) to adopt CECL for accounting purposes under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles during 2020 an option to delay an estimate of CECL’s impact on regulatory capital. The capital relief in the CECL IFR is calibrated to approximate the difference in allowances under CECL relative to the incurred loss methodology for the first two years of the transition period. The cumulative difference at the end of the second year of the transition period is then phased in to regulatory capital over a three-year transition period. In this way, the CECL IFR gradually phases in the full effect of CECL on regulatory capital, providing a five-year transition period. CTBI adopted CECL effective January 1, 2020 and chose the option to delay the estimated impact on regulatory capital using the relief options described above. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Allowance for Credit Losses” of this MD&A for additional information relating to CECL.

Community Bank Leverage Ratio. On April 6, 2020, federal banking regulators issued two interim final rules that make changes to the community bank leverage ratio (“CBLR”) framework and implementing certain directives of the CARES Act. Under the existing CBLR framework, which became effective as of January 1, 2020, community banks and holding companies (which would include CTB and CTBI) that satisfy certain qualifying criteria, including having less than $10 billion in average total consolidated assets and a leverage ratio (referred to as the “community bank leverage ratio”) of greater than 9%, were eligible to opt-in to the CBLR framework. The community bank leverage ratio is the ratio of a banking organization’s Tier 1 capital to its average total consolidated assets, both as reported on the banking organization’s applicable regulatory filings. The first of the April 2020 interim final rules provides that, as of the second quarter 2020, banking organizations with leverage ratios of 8% or greater (and that meet the other existing qualifying criteria) may elect to use the CBLR framework. It also establishes a two-quarter grace period for qualifying community banking organizations whose leverage ratios fall below the 8% CBLR requirement, so long as the banking organization maintains a leverage ratio of 7% or greater. The second interim final rule provides a transition from the temporary 8% CBLR requirement to a 9% CBLR requirement. It establishes a minimum CBLR of 8% for the second through fourth quarters of 2020, 8.5% for 2021, and 9% thereafter, and maintains a two-quarter grace period for qualifying community banking organizations whose leverage ratios fall no more than 100 basis points below the applicable CBLR requirement. CTBI elected to use the CBLR framework. Under either framework, CTBI and CTB would be considered well-capitalized under the applicable guidelines.

PPPL Facility. On April 9, 2020, in order to facilitate use of the PPPL Facility, federal banking regulators issued an interim final rule to modify the Basel III regulatory capital rules applicable to banking organizations to allow those organizations participating in the PPPL Facility to neutralize the regulatory capital effects of participating in the program. Specifically, the agencies have clarified that banking organizations, including CTBI and CTB, are permitted to assign a zero percent risk weight to covered loans pledged to the PPPL Facility for purposes of determining risk-weighted assets and the leverage ratio.

Results of Operations and Financial Condition

We reported record earnings for the second quarter ~~2019~~2020 of ~~$18.3~~$19.7 million, or ~~$1.03~~$1.11 per basic share, compared to ~~$14.9~~$6.6 million, or ~~$0.84~~$0.37 per basic share, earned during the first quarter ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$11.6~~$18.3 million, or ~~$0.66~~$1.03 per basic share, earned during the second quarter ~~2018. Earnings~~2019. The increase in earnings for the quarter was impacted by a $12.8 million positive variance in charges to the provision for credit losses. Year-to-date earnings for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 were $26.2 million, or $1.48 per basic share, compared to $33.3 million, or $1.88 per basic share, ~~compared to $27.4 million, or $1.55 per basic share, earned during~~for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

We continue to work diligently with our customers as we all continue to battle COVID-19. At June 30, 2020, we had 3,668 COVID-19 loan deferrals totaling $756.6 million, consisting of 850 commercial loan deferrals totaling $639.4 million, 485 residential loan deferrals totaling $63.3 million, and 2,264 consumer loan deferrals totaling $44.6 million, in addition to 69 serviced loan deferrals, pursuant to Freddie Mac guidelines, totaling $9.3 million. We also had 50 customers who had previously received COVID-19 loan deferrals that have requested assistance for a second time. Those deferrals total $68.4 million, consisting of 30 commercial loans deferrals totaling $65.7 million, 18 residential loan deferrals totaling $2.2 million, and two serviced loan deferrals, pursuant to Freddie Mac guidelines, totaling $0.5 million. These loan deferrals and modifications have been executed consistent with the guidelines of the CARES Act. Pursuant to the CARES Act, these loan deferrals are not included in our nonperforming loans disclosed below. As discussed above, we have continued to participate in the PPP program created under the CARES Act. As of June 30, 2020, we had 2,848 PPP loans authorized totaling $275.9 million. Of these, 2,703 were under $350 thousand, 132 were between $350 thousand and $2.0 million, and 13 were over $2.0 million. We have closed 2,782 of these loans for a total original note amount of $274.1 million.

Quarterly Highlights

❖	Net interest income for the quarter of ~~$36.0~~$38.5 million was ~~flat to~~$2.2 million, or 6.1%, above prior quarter ~~but an increase of $0.9~~and $2.4 million, or ~~2.5%~~6.8%, ~~from~~above second quarter ~~2018.~~2019.

❖

Provision for ~~loan~~credit losses for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2019 increased $1.4~~2020 decreased $12.8 million from prior quarter ~~but decreased $0.4~~and $1.6 million from prior year same quarter. The $12.7 million provision from prior quarter was a result of the projected economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, as disclosed in our prior quarter filings.

❖	Our loan portfolio increased ~~$2.5~~$251.2 million, an annualized ~~0.3%~~30.7%, during the quarter ~~but decreased $16.4~~and $290.1 million, or an annualized ~~1.0%~~18.0%, from December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

❖

Nonperforming loans at ~~$24.0~~$36.2 million increased $0.8 million from March 31, 2020 and $2.5 million from December 31, 2019. Nonperforming assets at $53.8 million decreased $1.4 million from March 31, ~~2019~~2020 but increased ~~$1.9~~$0.7 million from December 31, ~~2018. Nonperforming assets at $46.5 million decreased $3.9 million from March 31, 2019 and $2.9 million from December 31, 2018.~~2019.

❖	Deposits, including repurchase agreements, increased ~~$49.8~~$636.3 million, an annualized ~~5.5%~~70.5%, during the quarter and ~~$131.8~~$635.8 million, or an annualized ~~7.5%~~35.2%, from December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

❖	Noninterest income for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 of ~~$12.3~~$12.9 million was a ~~$0.1~~$1.4 million, or 11.8%, increase ~~over~~from prior quarter ~~but~~and a ~~decrease of $1.5~~$0.6 million, or ~~10.8%~~5.1%, increase from prior year same ~~quarter~~. quarter.

❖	Noninterest expense for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 of ~~$30.0~~$27.9 million ~~increased $0.9~~decreased $0.3 million, or ~~3.3%~~1.1%, from prior quarter, ~~but decreased $2.4~~and $2.1 million, or ~~7.4%~~7.1%, from prior year same quarter.

❖

In April 2019, Kentucky enacted HB458. HB458 allows for combined filing of state income taxes with CTBI and its subsidiaries, Community Trust Bank, Inc. and Community Trust and Investment Company, Inc. CTBI had previously filed a separate company return and generated net operating losses, in which it had maintained a valuation allowance against the related deferred tax asset. HB458 also allows for certain net operating losses to be utilized on a combined return. CTBI expects to file a combined return, beginning in 2021, and to utilize these previously generated losses. The tax benefit recorded in the second quarter 2019 to reverse the valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset for these losses was $3.6 million, or $0.21 per basic share.

Income Statement Review

(dollars in thousands)							Change 2019 vs. 2018												Change 2020 vs. 2019
Six Months Ended June 30	2019			2018			Amount			Percent			2020			2019			Amount			Percent
Net interest income	$	72,010		$	69,739		$	2,271			3.3	%	$	74,706		$	72,010		$	2,696			3.7	%
Provision for loan losses		1,753			2,875			(1,122	)		(39.0	)
Provision for credit losses														12,658			1,753			10,905			622.2	%
Noninterest income		24,422			27,050			(2,628	)		(9.7	)		24,400			24,422			(22	)		(0.1	)
Noninterest expense		59,113			61,120			(2,007	)		(3.3	)		56,130			59,113			(2,983	)		(5.0	)
Income taxes		2,303			5,381			(3,078	)		(57.2	)		4,087			2,303			1,784			77.5
Net income	$	33,263		$	27,413		$	5,850			21.3	%	$	26,231		$	33,263		$	(7,032	)		(21.1	)%

Average earning assets	$	4,018,187		$	3,899,314		$	118,873			3.0	%	$	4,326,752		$	4,018,187		$	308,565			7.7	%

Yield on average earnings assets, tax equivalent*		4.67	%		4.30	%		0.37	%		8.8	%
Yield on average earning assets, tax equivalent*														4.18	%		4.67	%		(0.49	)%		(10.5	)%
Cost of interest bearing funds		1.46	%		0.93	%		0.53	%		58.1	%		1.01	%		1.46	%		(0.45	)%		(30.9	)%
Net interest margin, tax equivalent*		3.63	%		3.63	%		0.00	%		0.0	%		3.49	%		3.63	%		(0.14	)%		(4.0	)%

*Yield on average earning assets and net interest margin were computed on a tax equivalent basis using a 21% tax rate.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income for the quarter of ~~$36.0~~$38.5 million was ~~relatively flat to prior quarter, but~~ an increase of ~~$0.9~~$2.2 million, or ~~2.5%~~6.1%, from first quarter 2020 and an increase of $2.4 million, or 6.8%, from second quarter ~~2018.~~2019. Our net interest margin at ~~3.57% declined 13~~3.41% decreased 17 basis points from prior quarter and 416 basis points from prior year same quarter, while our average earning assets increased ~~$102.8~~$465.8 million and ~~$141.3~~$490.3 million, respectively, during those same periods. Our yield on average earning assets decreased 843 basis points from prior quarter ~~but increased 32~~and 65 basis points from prior year same quarter, and our cost of funds ~~increased 7~~decreased 34 basis points from prior quarter and 5265 basis points from prior year same quarter. Our ratio of average loans to deposits, including repurchase agreements, was ~~87.3%~~84.5% for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 compared to 89.9% for the quarter ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~88.1%~~87.3% for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2018. Net~~2019. Year-to-date net interest income for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019 increased $2.3~~2020 was $74.7 million ~~or 3.3%, from~~compared to $72.0 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Average earning assets for the six months ended June 30, 2020 increased $308.6 million compared to the first six months of 2019, while our yield on average earning assets decreased 49 basis points and our cost of interest bearing funds decreased 45 basis points.

Provision for ~~Loan~~Credit Losses

The provision for ~~loan~~credit losses that was added to the allowance for the second quarter ~~2019~~2020 was ~~$1.6 million~~a credit of $49 thousand compared to ~~$0.2~~$12.7 million for the quarter ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$1.9~~the provision for loan losses of $1.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Year-to-date ~~allocations~~provision for credit losses were $12.7 million compared to the ~~reserve were~~provision for loan losses of $1.8 million at June 30, ~~2019 compared~~2019. As discussed more fully above, the substantial increase in the allowance during the prior quarter was primarily attributable to ~~$2.9 million at June 30, 2018.~~ the current COVID-19 pandemic and its expected potential impact on future net charge-offs. This provision represented a charge against current earnings in order to maintain the allowance at an appropriate level determined using the accounting estimates described in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section. Our reserve coverage (allowance for ~~loan and lease loss reserve~~credit losses to nonperforming loans) at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 was ~~146.0%~~129.0% compared to ~~137.8%~~139.8% at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~162.6%~~the allowance for loan and lease losses to nonperforming loans of 104.4% at ~~June 30, 2018.~~December 31, 2019. Our ~~loan~~credit loss reserve as a percentage of total loans outstanding ~~remained at 1.10% from March 31, 2019 to June 30, 2019, down from the 1.13%~~ at June 30, ~~2018.~~2020 decreased to 1.32%, compared to 1.50% at March 31, 2020 and the loan loss reserve of 1.08% from December 31, 2019. As of June 30, 2020, CTBI’s allowance for credit losses declined by $2.8 million or 19 basis points compared to March 31, 2020. The decline was primarily in the specific reserves allocated to individually evaluated loans. The decline in ACL as a percentage of loans was also driven by the large growth in PPP loans during the quarter totaling $267.0 million as of June 30, 2020. These loans were added as a segment and, as they are one hundred percent SBA guaranteed, these loans were provided no allowance for credit losses.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 of ~~$12.3~~$12.9 million was a ~~$0.1~~$1.4 million, or 11.8%, increase ~~over~~from prior quarter ~~but~~and a ~~decrease of $1.5~~$0.6 million, or ~~10.8%~~5.1%, increase from prior year same quarter. The ~~decrease~~increase in noninterest income ~~from prior year~~for the quarter was ~~primarily~~ the result of a ~~$0.5~~$1.3 million ~~decrease~~increase in gains on sales of loans, a $0.7 million increase in loan related fees, ~~due to~~and a ~~decline~~$0.7 million increase in ~~the fair market value of our mortgage servicing rights, along with~~securities gains, partially offset by a $1.0 million decrease in ~~other operating~~deposit related fees and a $0.3 million decrease in trust revenue. ~~Other operating~~The increase in loan related fees is due to fluctuation in the valuation of our mortgage servicing rights. The decrease in deposit related fees was impacted by a 30-day waiver of overdraft charges as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic which resulted in a $0.7 million loss in revenue ~~for~~in April. Additionally, overdraft fees have seen a general decline since the ~~second~~COVID – 19 pandemic resulting in an additional decline in overdraft revenue of $0.7 million. The decrease in overdraft fees was partially offset by a $0.4 million increase in Visa Debit fee income. The positive variance to prior year same quarter ~~2018~~ included a ~~gain~~$1.2 million increase in gains on ~~the sale~~sales of loans, a ~~partnership interest resulting from~~$0.7 million increase in securities gains, and a ~~low~~$0.4 million increase in loan related fees, partially offset by a $1.6 million decrease in deposit service charges and a $0.2 million decrease in trust revenue. Year-to-date noninterest income ~~housing tax credit recapture. Noninterest income~~was $24.4 million for both the six months ~~ended~~periods ending June 30, ~~2019 was a $2.6 million, or 9.7%, decrease from prior year.~~2020 and 2019.

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 of ~~$30.0~~$27.9 million ~~increased $0.9~~decreased $0.3 million, or ~~3.3%~~1.1%, from prior quarter, ~~but decreased $2.4~~and $2.1 million, or ~~7.4%~~7.1%, from prior year same quarter. The ~~increase~~decrease from prior quarter was primarily due to a $0.3 million decrease in net other real estate owned expense. The decrease in noninterest expense from prior quarter consisted of increases in FDIC insurance ($0.2 million), net other real estate owned expense ($0.3 million), operating losses ($0.2 million), loan related expense ($0.2 million), and other direct expense ($0.4 million), partially offset by a $0.3 million decrease in repossession expense. The $0.4 million increase in other direct expense was the result of increased amortization expense related to tax credits. The decrease from prior year ~~was due to the previously disclosed $3.6 million accrual in June 2018 for customer reimbursements, partially offset by a $0.7 million increase in personnel expense. The increase in personnel expense~~same quarter included a $0.9 million ~~increase~~decrease in ~~salaries, partially offset by a $0.3~~personnel expense, as bonuses and incentives decreased $0.6 million ~~decrease in~~and the cost of group medical ~~insurance.~~and life insurance declined $0.4 million. Noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 was ~~$59.1~~$3.0 million ~~a $2.0 million, or 3.3%, decrease from~~below the ~~first~~ six months ended June 30, 2019 as personnel expense decreased $1.9 million year over year, with decreases of ~~2018.~~$1.7 million in bonuses and incentives and $0.8 million in the cost of group medical and life insurance, offset partially by an increase of $0.8 million in salaries. The accruals for incentive payments are lower than prior year based on our current projected earnings for the year. We also had decreases year over year in several other noninterest expense categories, such as FDIC insurance ($0.1 million), marketing and promotional ($0.2 million), advertising ($0.3 million), charitable contributions ($0.1 million), postage and shipping ($0.1 million), and net other real estate owned expense ($0.3 million).

Balance Sheet Review

CTBI’s total assets at ~~$4.4~~$5.0 billion increased ~~$64.0~~$670.2 million, or ~~5.9%~~61.9% annualized, from March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$175.6~~$656.8 million, or ~~8.4%~~30.3% annualized, from December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Loans outstanding at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 were ~~$3.2~~$3.5 billion, an increase of ~~$2.5~~$251.2 million, an annualized ~~0.3%~~30.7%, from March 31, ~~2019 but a decrease of $16.4~~2020 and $290.1 million, or ~~1.0%~~18.0% annualized, from December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. We experienced increases during the quarter of ~~$2.0~~$229.1 million in the commercial loan portfolio ~~$7.1~~(primarily PPP loans), $41.8 million in the ~~residential~~indirect consumer loan portfolio, and ~~$3.3~~$1.9 million in the direct consumer loan portfolio, offset partially by a $21.6 million decrease in the residential loan portfolio. The historically low mortgage loan rates have created a significant refinancing boom. In the quarter ended June 30, 2020, we closed and delivered 647 secondary market mortgage loans for a total of ~~$9.9~~$116.4 million compared to 122 secondary market mortgage loans closed and delivered totaling $16.0 million in the ~~indirect consumer loan portfolio.~~second quarter 2019. Correspondingly, our total mortgage servicing portfolio increased by $34.5 million during the quarter to $486.3 million. CTBI’s investment portfolio ~~decreased $7.5~~increased $107.4 million, or an annualized ~~5.0%~~68.0%, from March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$2.2~~$140.1 million, or ~~0.7%~~46.9% annualized, from December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Deposits in other banks increased ~~$67.8~~$289.9 million from ~~March 31, 2019~~prior quarter and ~~$189.7~~$208.9 million from December 31, ~~2018, as the yield earned was favorable to other investment alternatives.~~2019. Deposits, including repurchase agreements, at ~~$3.7~~$4.3 billion increased ~~$49.8~~$636.3 million, or an annualized ~~5.5%~~70.5%, from March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$131.8~~$635.8 million, or ~~7.5%~~35.2% annualized, from December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.The increase in deposits is primarily the result of the receipt of advance Medicare payments from some customers in the healthcare industry, PPP loan proceeds retained on deposit by corporate borrowers, and stimulus payments received and retained by our customers, all a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Shareholders’ equity at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 was ~~$594.7~~$631.8 million, ~~a 11.9% annualized~~an $18.9 million increase from the ~~$577.5~~$612.9 million at March 31, ~~2019~~2020, and a ~~10.9% annualized~~$17.0 million increase from the ~~$564.2~~$614.9 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Our tangible common equity/tangible assets ratio at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 was ~~12.27%~~11.42%.

Loans

(in thousands)	June 30, 2019												June 30, 2020
Loan Category	Balance		Variance from Prior Year-End			YTD Net Charge- Offs			Nonperforming		ALLL		Balance		Variance from Prior Year-End			YTD Net Charge- Offs			Nonperforming		ACL
Commercial:
Construction	$	65,771		(20.5	)%	$	(65	)	$	546	$	799
Secured by real estate		1,192,768		0.8			(254	)		11,471		15,098
Equipment lease financing		962		(44.7	)		0			0		7
Hotel/motel													$	257,245		14.3	%	$	0		$	132	$	6,132
Commercial real estate residential														257,517		(4.4	)		(73	)		9,114		3,439
Commercial real estate nonresidential														772,537		(1.0	)		(176	)		13,109		11,408
Dealer floorplans														62,909		(25.0	)		(26	)		0		1,585
Commercial other		390,048		3.4			(723	)		1,175		4,889		288,850		(5.7	)		(2,099	)		2,300		4,703
Commercial unsecured SBA PPP														266,951		100.0			0			0		0
Total commercial		1,649,549		0.3			(1,042	)		13,192		20,793		1,906,009		14.5			(2,374	)		24,655		27,267

Residential:
Real estate construction		57,017		(0.3	)		0			285		358
Real estate mortgage		722,573		0.0			(267	)		9,305		4,187		780,632		(2.0	)		(148	)		9,436		7,336
Home equity		109,831		3.3			(58	)		938		933		108,531		(3.0	)		2			1,173		856
Total residential		889,421		0.4			(325	)		10,528		5,478		889,163		(2.1	)		(146	)		10,609		8,192

Consumer:
Consumer direct		145,149		0.6			(397	)		40		1,767		147,284		(0.5	)		(412	)		372		1,932
Consumer indirect		508,088		(4.8	)		(899	)		218		6,960		596,314		13.1			(1,228	)		521		9,243
Total consumer		653,237		(3.7	)		(1,296	)		258		8,727		743,598		10.1			(1,640	)		893		11,175

Total loans	$	3,192,207		(0.5	)%	$	(2,663	)	$	23,978	$	34,998	$	3,538,770		8.9	%	$	(4,160	)	$	36,157	$	46,634

Asset Quality

CTBI’s total nonperforming loans, not including performing troubled debt restructurings, were ~~$24.0~~$36.2 million, or ~~0.75%~~1.02% of total loans, at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 compared to ~~$25.4~~$35.4 million, or ~~0.80%~~1.08% of total loans, at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$22.1~~$33.6 million, or ~~0.69%~~1.03% of total loans, at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Accruing loans 90+ days past due ~~decreased $1.9~~increased $3.8 million from prior quarter ~~but increased $0.9~~and $2.2 million from December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The increase in accruing loans 90+ days past due includes a $4 million loan which is well-secured and in the process of collection. Nonaccrual loans ~~increased $0.5~~decreased $3.0 million during the quarter ~~and $1.0~~but increased $0.4 million from December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Accruing loans 30-89 days past due at ~~$30.6~~$13.7 million ~~was an increase of $8.8~~decreased $10.4 million from prior quarter and ~~$7.9~~$9.3 million from December 31, ~~2018. The increase in loans 30-89 days past due is primarily two credits, both of which are well collateralized.~~2019. Our loan portfolio management processes focus on the immediate identification, management, and resolution of problem loans to maximize recovery and minimize loss. Our loan portfolio risk management processes include weekly delinquent loan review meetings at the market levels and monthly delinquent loan review meetings involving senior corporate management to review all nonaccrual loans and loans 30 days or more past due. Any activity regarding a criticized/classified loan (i.e. problem loan) must be approved by CTB’s Watch List Asset Committee (i.e. Problem Loan Committee). CTB’s Watch List Asset Committee also meets on a quarterly basis and reviews every criticized/classified loan of $100,000 or greater. We also have a Loan Review Department that reviews every market within CTB annually and performs extensive testing of the loan portfolio to assure the accuracy of loan grades and classifications for delinquency, troubled debt restructuring, ~~impaired status, impairment,~~ nonaccrual status, and adequate loan loss reserves.

Impaired loans, loans not expected to meet contractual principal and interest payments other than insignificant delays, at June 30, 2019 totaled $54.6 million, compared to $50.4 million at March 31, 2018 and $46.4 million at December 31, 2018.~~Management evaluates all impaired loans for the amount of impairment, if any, and records a direct charge-off or provides specific reserves when necessary.~~

For further information regarding nonperforming ~~and impaired~~ loans, see ~~note~~Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

CTBI generally does not offer high risk loans such as option ARM products, high loan to value ratio mortgages, interest-only loans, loans with initial teaser rates, or loans with negative amortizations, and therefore, CTBI would have no significant exposure to these products.

Our level of foreclosed properties at ~~$22.5~~$17.7 million at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 was a ~~$2.5~~$2.1 million decrease from the ~~$25.0~~$19.8 million at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and a ~~$4.8~~$1.8 million decrease from the ~~$27.3~~$19.5 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Sales of foreclosed properties for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 totaled ~~$4.8~~$2.9 million while new foreclosed properties totaled ~~$1.2~~$1.9 million. The suspension of residential foreclosure actions as a result of COVID-19 has continued through the second quarter 2020. At June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the book value of properties under contracts to sell was ~~$1.6~~$2.0 million; however, the closings had not occurred at quarter-end.

When foreclosed properties are acquired, appraisals are obtained and the properties are booked at the current market value less expected sales costs. Additionally, periodic updated appraisals are obtained on unsold foreclosed properties. When an updated appraisal reflects a fair market value below the current book value, a charge is booked to current earnings to reduce the property to its new market value less expected sales costs. Charges to earnings in the second quarter ~~2019~~2020 to reflect the decrease in current market values of foreclosed properties totaled ~~$0.7~~$0.3 million. There ~~were six properties~~was one property reappraised during the second quarter ~~2019. Of these, four properties were~~2020, which was written down ~~by a total of $0.1 million.~~$16 thousand. Charges to earnings during the quarters ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018~~2019 were ~~$0.4~~$0.5 million and ~~$0.9~~$0.7 million, respectively. Charges to earnings for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 were ~~$1.1~~$0.8 million compared to ~~$1.3~~$1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Our policy for determining the frequency of periodic reviews is based upon consideration of the specific properties and the known or perceived market fluctuations in a particular market and is typically between 12 and 18 months but generally not more than 24 months. Approximately ~~ninety-five~~ninety-two percent of our OREO properties have appraisals dated within the past 18 months. Management anticipates that our foreclosed properties will remain elevated as we work through current market conditions.

The appraisal aging analysis of foreclosed properties, as well as the holding period, at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 is shown below:

(in thousands)	(in thousands)				(in thousands)
Appraisal Aging Analysis	Appraisal Aging Analysis		Holding Period Analysis		Appraisal Aging Analysis					Holding Period Analysis
Days Since Last Appraisal	Number of Properties	Current Book Value	Holding Period	Current Book Value		Number of Properties		Current Book Value		Holding Period	Current Book Value
Up to 3 months	7	$897	Less than one year	$2,819			3	$	109	Less than one year	$	2,113
3 to 6 months	19	2,583	1 year	1,559			25		1,939	1 year		1,178
6 to 9 months	8	361	2 years	437			15		7,770	2 years		1,169
9 to 12 months	31	2,450	3 years	5,663			26		4,609	3 years		246
12 to 18 months	37	5,423	4 years	922			17		2,147	4 years		2,858
18 to 24 months	2	3,315	5 years	1,004			4		190	5 years		653
Over 24 months	3	7,507	6 years*	6			3		911	6 years*		640
Total	107	$22,536	7 years*	8,600			93	$	17,675	7 years*		0
			8 years*	963						8 years*		7,855
			9 years*	563						9 years*		963
			Total	$22,536						Total	$	17,675

*Regulatory approval is required and has been obtained to hold these properties beyond the initial period of 5 years. Additional approval may be required to continue to hold these properties should they not be liquidated during the extension period, which is typically one year. To the extent we are not able to sell a foreclosed property in 10 years, we will be required to relinquish ownership of that property.

As disclosed above, CTBI is required to dispose of any foreclosed property that has not been sold within 10 years. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, two foreclosed ~~property~~properties with a total book value of ~~$0.6~~$1.0 million ~~representing 2.5% or our foreclosed properties (based on book value),~~ had been held by us for at least nine years. ~~The book value at June 30, 2019 represents management’s best estimate of realizable value~~One of the ~~properties.~~properties totaling $0.9 million is expected to sell in the third quarter 2020 at no expected loss.

Net loan charge-offs for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 were ~~$1.6~~$2.8 million, or ~~0.20%~~0.32% of average loans annualized, compared to ~~$1.1~~$1.4 million, or ~~0.14%~~0.17%, experienced for the first quarter ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$1.3~~$1.6 million, or ~~0.17%~~0.20%, for the second quarter ~~2018.~~2019. Of the net charge-offs for the quarter, $2.1 million were in commercial loans, $0.4 million were in indirect consumer loans, $0.2 million were in direct consumer loans, and $0.1 million were in residential loans. Net loan charge-offs for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 were $4.2 million, or 0.25% of average loans, compared to $2.7 million, or 0.17% of average loans, ~~compared to $3.3 million, or 0.21% of average loans,~~ experienced for the six ~~month~~months ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Of the net charge-offs for the six ~~months, $1.1 million~~month, $2.4 were in commercial loans, ~~$0.9~~$1.2 million were in indirect consumer loans, ~~$0.3 million were in residential loans, and~~ $0.4 million were in direct consumer loans, and $0.2 million were in residential loans.

Dividends

The following schedule shows the quarterly cash dividends paid for the past six quarters:

Pay Date	Record Date	Amount Per Share
July 1, 2020	June 15, 2020	$0.38
April 1, 2020	March 15, 2020	$0.38
January 1, 2020	December 15, 2019	$0.38
October 1, 2019	September 15, 2019	$0.38
July 1, 2019	June 15, 2019	$0.36
April 1, 2019	March 15, 2019	$0.36
~~January 1, 2019~~	~~December 15, 2018~~	~~$0.36~~
~~October 1, 2018~~	~~September 15, 2018~~	~~$0.36~~
~~July 1, 2018~~	~~June 15, 2018~~	~~$0.33~~
~~April 1, 2018~~	~~March 15, 2018~~	~~$0.33~~

On July 23, 2019, the Board of Directors of CTBI declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.38 per share to be paid on October 1, 2019 to shareholders of record on September 15, 2019. This represents an increase of 5.6% in the quarterly cash dividend.

Liquidity and Market Risk

The objective of CTBI’s Asset/Liability management function is to maintain consistent growth in net interest income within our policy limits. This objective is accomplished through management of our consolidated balance sheet composition, liquidity, and interest rate risk exposures arising from changing economic conditions, interest rates, and customer preferences. The goal of liquidity management is to provide adequate funds to meet changes in loan and lease demand or deposit withdrawals. This is accomplished by maintaining liquid assets in the form of cash and cash equivalents and investment securities, sufficient unused borrowing capacity, and growth in core deposits and wholesale funding (including the use of wholesale brokered deposits). As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we had approximately ~~$321.6~~$478.1 million in cash and cash equivalents and approximately ~~$591.6~~$740.5 million in securities valued at estimated fair value designated as available-for-sale and available to meet liquidity needs on a continuing basis compared to ~~$141.5~~$264.7 million and ~~$593.7~~$599.8 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Additional asset-driven liquidity is provided by the remainder of the securities portfolio and the repayment of loans. In addition to core deposit funding, we also have a variety of other short-term and long-term funding sources available. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we had wholesale brokered deposits outstanding of ~~$42.3~~$37.1 million with a weighted average maturity of ~~1.08~~0.21 years compared to ~~$42.3~~$37.1 million with a weighted average maturity of ~~1.58~~0.71 years at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. We also rely on Federal Home Loan Bank advances for both liquidity and management of our asset/liability position. Federal Home Loan Bank advances were $0.4 million at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we had a ~~$341.3~~$371.4 million available borrowing position with the Federal Home Loan Bank compared to ~~$312.2~~$391.9 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. We generally rely upon net inflows of cash from financing activities, supplemented by net inflows of cash from operating activities, to provide cash for our investing activities. As is typical of many financial institutions, significant financing activities include deposit gathering, use of short-term borrowing facilities such as repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased, use of wholesale brokered deposits, and issuance of long-term debt. At June 30, ~~2019 and December 31, 2018,~~2020 we had ~~$45~~$75 million in lines of credit with various correspondent banks available to meet any future cash ~~needs.~~needs compared to $45 million at December 31, 2019. Our primary investing activities include purchases of securities and loan originations. We do not rely on any one source of liquidity and manage availability in response to changing consolidated balance sheet needs. Included in our cash and cash equivalents at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 were deposits with the Federal Reserve of ~~$265.0~~$412.2 million compared to ~~$73.5~~$203.6 million at December 31, ~~2018. At December 31, 2018, cash and cash equivalents included federal funds sold of $1.1 million; however, we had no federal funds sold as of June 30,~~ 2019. Additionally, we project cash flows from our investment portfolio to generate additional liquidity over the next 90 days.

The investment portfolio consists of investment grade short-term issues suitable for bank investments. The majority of the investment portfolio is in U.S. government and government sponsored agency issuances. At June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities comprised ~~substantially~~ all of the total investment portfolio, and the AFS portfolio was approximately ~~99%~~117% of equity capital. ~~Eighty-nine~~Eighty-three percent of the pledge eligible portfolio was pledged.

Interest Rate Risk

We consider interest rate risk one of our most significant market risks. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income due to changes in interest rates. Consistency of our net interest revenue is largely dependent upon the effective management of interest rate risk. We employ a variety of measurement techniques to identify and manage our interest rate risk including the use of an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity to changing interest rates. The model is based on actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for on and off-balance sheet instruments and incorporates market-based assumptions regarding the effect of changing interest rates on the prepayment rates of certain assets and liabilities. Assumptions based on the historical behavior of deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also incorporated into the model. These assumptions are inherently uncertain, and as a result, the model cannot precisely measure net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies.

CTBI’s Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO), which includes executive and senior management representatives and reports to the Board of Directors, monitors and manages interest rate risk within Board-approved policy limits. Our current exposure to interest rate risks is determined by measuring the anticipated change in net interest income spread evenly over the twelve-month period.

Capital Resources

Shareholders’ equity ~~was $594.7 million~~ at June 30, ~~2019 and $564.2~~2020 was $631.8 million, a $17.0 million increase from the $614.9 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Cash dividends were $0.76 per share and $0.72 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. CTBI’s annualized dividend yield to shareholders as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 was ~~3.41%~~4.64%. Our primary source of capital growth is the retention of earnings. ~~Cash dividends were $0.72 per share and $0.66 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.~~ We retained ~~61.7%~~48.6% of our earnings for the first six months of ~~2019~~2020 compared to ~~57.4%~~61.7% for the first six months of ~~2018.~~2019.

On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve approved final rules that substantially amended the regulatory risk-based capital rules applicable to CTBI and CTB. The FDIC subsequently approved these rules. The final rules implemented the “Basel III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act.

The rules included new risk-based capital and leverage ratios, which were phased in from 2015 to January 2019, and refined the definition of what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating those ratios. The minimum capital level requirements applicable to CTBI and CTB under the final rules are: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6%; (iii) a total capital ratio of 8%; and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% for all institutions. The final rules also established a “capital conservation buffer” above the new regulatory minimum capital requirements, which must consist entirely of common equity Tier 1 capital. The capital conservation buffer began to be phased in on January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets increased by 0.625% annually until fully implemented in January 2019. An institution is subject to limitations on certain activities including payment of dividends, share repurchases, and discretionary bonuses to executive officers if its capital level is below the total capital plus capital conservation buffer amount.

The final rules also contain revisions to the prompt corrective action framework, which is designed to place restrictions on insured depository institutions, including CTB, if their capital levels begin to show signs of weakness. These revisions took effect January 1, 2015. Under the prompt corrective action requirements, which are designed to complement the capital conservation buffer, insuredInsured depository institutions are required to meet the following capital level requirements in order to qualify as ~~“well capitalized:~~“well-capitalized:” (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8%; (iii) a total capital ratio of 10%; and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5%. We currently satisfy the well-capitalized and the capital conservation standards required by the Federal Reserve, and based on our current capital composition and levels, we anticipate that our capital ratios, on a Basel III basis, will continue to exceed the well-capitalized minimum capital requirements and capital conservation buffer standards.

On October 29, 2019, federal banking regulators adopted a final rule to simplify the regulatory capital requirements for eligible community banks and holding companies that opt-in to the community bank leverage ratio framework (the “CBLR framework”), as required by Section 201 of the Economic Growth, Relief and Consumer Protection Act of 2018. Under the final rule, which became effective as of January 1, 2020, community banks and holding companies (which would include CTB and CTBI) that satisfy certain qualifying criteria, including having less than $10 billion in average total consolidated assets and a leverage ratio (referred to as the “community bank leverage ratio”) of greater than 9%, were eligible to opt-in to the CBLR framework. The community bank leverage ratio is the ratio of a banking organization’s Tier 1 capital to its average total consolidated assets, both as reported on the banking organization’s applicable regulatory filings. As discussed in “COVID-19, the CARES Act and Related Regulatory Actions – Regulatory Capital” of this MD&A, the CBLR framework was modified in response to COVID-19. However, CTBI intends to continue with the existing layered ratio structure. Under either framework, CTBI and CTB would be considered well-capitalized under the applicable guidelines.

On March 27, 2020, pursuant to the CARES Act, federal banking regulators issued an interim final rule that delays the estimated impact on regulatory capital stemming from the implementation of CECL for a transition period of up to five years (the “CECL IFR”). The CECL IFR provides banking organizations that are required (as of January 1, 2020) to adopt CECL for accounting purposes under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles during 2020 an option to delay an estimate of CECL’s impact on regulatory capital. The capital relief in the CECL IFR is calibrated to approximate the difference in allowances under CECL relative to the incurred loss methodology for the first two years of the transition period. The cumulative difference at the end of the second year of the transition period is then phased in to regulatory capital over a three-year transition period. In this way, the CECL IFR gradually phases in the full effect of CECL on regulatory capital, providing a five-year transition period. CTBI adopted CECL effective January 1, 2020 and chose the option to delay the estimated impact on regulatory capital using the relief options described above.

On April 9, 2020, in order to facilitate use of the PPPL Facility, federal banking regulators issued an interim final rule to modify the Basel III regulatory capital rules applicable to banking organizations to allow those organizations participating in the PPPL Facility to neutralize the regulatory capital effects of including CTBI and CTB, are permitted to assign a zero percent risk weight to covered loans pledged to the PPPL Facility for purposes of determining risk-weighted assets and the leverage ratio.

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, CTBI had a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of ~~16.83%~~17.21%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of ~~18.67%~~18.93%, a total capital ratio of ~~19.80%~~20.18%, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of ~~13.61%~~12.92%. Our capital conservation buffer at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 was ~~11.80%~~12.18%.

In December 2017, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision unveiled the latest round of its regulatory framework, commonly referred to as Basel IV. The framework makes changes to the capital framework of Basel III and is targeted for a timeframe of 2022-2027 for implementation. The new framework appears designed to limit the flexibility of financial institutions using advanced approaches to calculate credit and other risks and also makes significant amendments to the standardized approaches to credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, and operational risk. The manner and the form in which the Basel IV framework will be implemented in the U.S. are uncertain.

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we are not aware of any current recommendations by banking regulatory authorities which, if they were to be implemented, would have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material adverse impact on our liquidity, capital resources, or operations.

Impact of Inflation, Changing Prices, and Economic Conditions

The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Therefore, CTBI differs greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investment in nonmonetary assets, such as fixed assets and inventories. However, inflation does have an important impact on the growth of assets in the banking industry and on the resulting need to increase equity capital at higher than normal rates in order to maintain an appropriate equity to assets ratio. Inflation also affects other expenses, which tend to rise during periods of general inflation.

We believe one of the most significant impacts on financial and operating results is our ability to react to changes in interest rates. We seek to maintain an essentially balanced position between interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities in order to protect against the effects of wide interest rate fluctuations.

~~Beginning~~We are all finding ourselves living and operating in ~~2008,~~unprecedented times as the ~~U.S. economy faced~~COVID-19 pandemic is causing personal and financial hardship to our customers, employees, and communities. During these challenging times, we have instituted programs to support our customers with loan modifications, forbearance, and fee waivers and participated in programs created by the government stimulus programs like the Paycheck Protection Program, focused on helping small businesses keep their employees and meet their expenses as they are unable to operate due to mandated closures. We instituted programs supporting our employees focused on healthcare, childcare, and remote and split schedule work, as well as work space changes that allow for proper social distancing to keep our employees safe as we continue to operate as a ~~severe economic crisis including a major recession from which recovery was slow~~critical part of the economy. We continue to support our communities through donations to non-profit organizations as they strive to continue their commitments of serving those in need. We also continue to manage our company for the long term and ~~uneven. Commerce~~our strong capital position and ~~business growth in certain regions~~culture of building communities built on trust will facilitate our ability to manage through these challenging times. Our results for the first six months were good, but the extraordinary changes in the ~~U.S. remains reduced~~economic conditions and ~~local governments and many businesses continue to experience financial difficulty. In some areas~~the implications of the ~~U.S., including certain parts~~impact of COVID-19 to the future for our ~~service area, unemployment levels remain elevated. There can be no assurance that these conditions~~customers had a material impact on our first quarter provision for credit losses. We will continue to ~~improve and these conditions could worsen. In addition,~~serve our constituents while we all meet the ~~level~~challenges of U.S. debt, the Federal Open Market Committee’s monetary policy, potential volatility in oil prices, U.S. tax law modifications, political events, and trade policies may have a destabilizing effect on financial markets or a negative effect on the economy.

Our financial performance generally, and in particular the ability of borrowers to pay interest on and repay principal of outstanding loans and the value of collateral securing those loans, as well as demand for loans and other products and services we offer, is highly dependent upon the business environment in the markets where we operate, in the states of Kentucky, West Virginia, and Tennessee and in the United States as a whole. While unemployment rates have improved in all of the markets in which we operate, unemployment rates in our markets remain high compared to the national average. A favorable business environment is generally characterized by, among other factors, economic growth, efficient capital markets, low inflation, low unemployment, high business and investor confidence, and strong business earnings. Unfavorable or uncertain economic and market conditions can be caused by declines in economic growth, business activity, or investor or business confidence; limitations on the availability or increases in the cost of credit and capital; increases in inflation or interest rates; high unemployment; natural disasters; or a combination of these or other factors.

While economic conditions in the United States and worldwide have improved since the recession, there can be no assurance that this improvement will continue or that another recession will not occur. Economic pressure on consumers and uncertainty regarding continuing economic improvement may result in changes in consumer and business spending, borrowing, and savings habits. Such conditions could adversely affect the credit quality of our loans and our business, financial condition, and results of operations.living with COVID-19.

Stock Repurchase Program

~~CTBI has not acquired any shares of common stock through the~~CTBI’s stock repurchase program ~~since February 2008. There are 67,371~~began in December 1998 with the authorization to acquire up to 500,000 shares and was increased by an additional 1,000,000 shares in July 2000, May 2003, and March 2020. CTBI repurchased 32,664 shares of its common stock during the first quarter 2020, leaving 1,034,706 shares remaining under ~~CTBI’s~~our current repurchase authorization. As of June 30, 2020, a total of 2,465,294 shares have been repurchased through this program.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We have identified the following critical accounting policies:

Investments – Management determines the classification of securities at purchase. We classify debt securities into held-to-maturity, trading, or available-for-sale categories. Held-to-maturity securities are those which we have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 320, Investments – Debt Securities, investments in debt securities that are not classified as held-to-maturity shall be classified in one of the following categories and measured at fair value in the statement of financial position:

a. Trading ~~securities~~.securities. Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term (thus held for only a short period of time) shall be classified as trading securities. Trading generally reflects active and frequent buying and selling, and trading securities are generally used with the objective of generating profits on short-term differences in price.

b. Available-for-sale securities. Investments not classified as trading securities (nor as held-to-maturity securities) shall be classified as available-for-sale securities.

~~When~~With the ~~fair value~~implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (commonly referred to as “CECL”), an allowance will be recognized for credit losses relative to available-for-sale securities rather than as a reduction in the cost basis of the security. Subsequent improvements in credit quality or reductions in estimated credit losses will be recognized immediately as a reversal of the previously recorded allowance, which aligns the income statement recognition of credit losses with the reporting period in which changes occur.

Held-to-maturity securities will be subject to CECL. CECL will require an allowance on these held-to-maturity debt securities for lifetime expected credit losses, determined by adjusting historical loss information for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The forward-looking evaluation of lifetime expected losses will be performed on a pooled basis for bonds that share similar risk characteristics. These allowances for expected losses must be made by the holder of the HTM debt security when the security is below its amortized cost, and depending on the length of time the condition exists and the extent the fair market value is below amortized cost, additional analysis is performed to determine whether an other than temporary impairment condition exists. Available-for-sale and held-to-maturitypurchased. At June 30, 2020, CTBI held no securities ~~are analyzed quarterly~~designated as held-to-maturity.

CTBI accounts for ~~possible other than temporary impairment. The analysis considers (i) whether we have the intent to sell our~~equity securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and (ii) whether it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity. Often, the information available to conduct these assessments is limited and rapidly changing, making estimates of fair value subject to judgment. If actual information or conditions are different than estimated, the extent of the impairment of the security may be different than previously estimated, which could have a material effect on CTBI’s results of operations and financial condition.

~~Subsequent to the January 1, 2018 effective date of ASU 2016-01, ASC 320 applies only to debt securities and~~in accordance with ASC 321, Investments – Equity Securities~~, applies to equity securities.~~. ASC 321 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method and those that result in the consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair values recognized in net income.

Loans – Loans with the ability and the intent to be held until maturity and/or payoff are reported at the carrying value of unpaid principal reduced by unearned interest, an allowance for loan and lease losses, and unamortized deferred fees or costs. Income is recorded on the level yield basis. Interest accrual is discontinued when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions, collateral value, and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful. Any loan greater than 90 days past due must be well secured and in the process of collection to continue accruing interest. Cash payments received on nonaccrual loans generally are applied against principal, and interest income is only recorded once principal recovery is reasonably assured. Loans are not reclassified as accruing until principal and interest payments remain current for a period of time, generally six months, and future payments appear reasonably certain. ~~Included in certain loan categories of impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings that were classified as impaired.~~ A restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if the creditor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.

Allowance for ~~Loan and Lease~~Credit Losses – FASB issued ASU 2016-13 in 2016 which introduced the current expected credit losses methodology (CECL) for estimating allowances for credit losses. This accounting change was effective January 1, 2020. CTBI measures expected credit losses of financial assets on a collective (pool) basis using loss-rate methods when the financial assets share similar risk characteristics. Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis. Regardless of an initial measurement method, once it is determined that foreclosure is probable, the allowance for credit losses is measured based on the fair value of the collateral as of the measurement date. As a practical expedient, the fair value of the collateral may be used for a loan when determining the allowance for credit losses for which the repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. The fair value shall be adjusted for selling costs. For collateral-dependent financial assets, the credit loss expected may be zero if the fair value less costs to sell exceed the amortized cost of the loan. Loans shall not be included in both collective assessments and individual assessments.

In the event that collection of principal becomes uncertain, CTBI has policies in place to reverse accrued interest in a timely manner. Therefore, CTBI elected ASU 2019-04 which allows that accrued interest would continue to be presented separately and not part of amortized cost on loan. The methodology used by CTBI is developed using the current loan balance, which is then compared to amortized cost balances to analyze the impact. The difference in amortized cost basis versus consideration of loan balances impacts the allowance for credit losses calculation by one basis point and is considered immaterial. The primary difference is for indirect lending premiums.

When any secured commercial loan is considered uncollectable, whether past due or not, a current assessment of the value of the underlying collateral is made. If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the collateral, the loan is placed on nonaccrual and the loan is charged down to the value of the collateral less estimated cost to sell or a specific reserve equal to the difference between book value of the loan and the fair value assigned to the collateral is created until such time as the loan is foreclosed. When the foreclosed collateral has been legally assigned to CTBI, the estimated fair value of the collateral less costs to sell is then transferred to other real estate owned or other repossessed assets, and a charge-off is taken for any remaining balance. When any unsecured commercial loan is considered uncollectable the loan is charged off no later than at 90 days past due.

Historical loss rates for loans are adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition. ~~We use twelve rolling quarters~~With the implementation of ASC 326, weighted average life (“WAL”) calculations were completed as a tool to determine the life of CTBI’s various loan segments. Vintage modeling was used to determine the life of loan losses for ~~our historical loss rate analysis. Factors that we consider~~consumer and residential real estate loans. Static pool modeling was used to determine the life of loan losses for commercial loan segments. Qualitative factors used to derive CTBI’s total ACL include delinquency trends, current economic conditions and trends, strength of supervision and administration of the loan portfolio, levels of underperforming loans, ~~level of recoveries to prior year’s charge-offs,~~ trends in loan losses, ~~industry concentrations and their relative strengths, amount of unsecured loans,~~ and underwriting exceptions. With the implementation of ASC 326, forecasting factors including unemployment rates, and industry specific forecasts for industries in which our total exposure is 5% of capital or greater are also included as factors in the ACL model. Management continually reevaluates the other subjective factors included in its ~~ALLL~~ACL analysis.

Other Real Estate Owned – When foreclosed properties are acquired, appraisals are obtained and the properties are booked at the current fair market value less expected sales costs. Additionally, periodic updated appraisals are obtained on unsold foreclosed properties. When an updated appraisal reflects a fair market value below the current book value, a charge is booked to current earnings to reduce the property to its new fair market value less expected sales costs. Our policy for determining the frequency of periodic ~~reviews~~Previews is based upon consideration of the specific properties and the known or perceived market fluctuations in a particular market and is typically between 12 and 18 months but generally not more than 24 months. All revenues and expenses related to the carrying of other real estate owned are recognized through the income statement.

As a bank doing business in Kentucky, CTB is subject to a capital-based Kentucky bank franchise tax and exempt from Kentucky corporate income tax. However, in March 2019, Kentucky enacted HB354, which will transition CTB from the bank franchise tax to a corporate income tax beginning January 1, 2021. The current Kentucky corporate income tax rate is 5%. As of March 31, 2019, CTBI recorded a deferred tax liability, net of the federal benefit, of $1.0 million due to the enactment of HB354.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest rate risk management focuses on maintaining consistent growth in net interest income within Board-approved policy limits. CTBI uses an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity to movements in interest rates. Given a 200 basis point increase to the yield curve used in the simulation model, it is estimated net interest income for CTBI would increase by ~~5.87~~5.79 percent over one year and ~~8.52~~10.37 percent over two years. A ~~200~~25 basis point decrease in the yield curve would decrease net interest income by an estimated ~~5.82~~0.77 percent over one year and ~~9.42~~2.10 percent over two years. For further discussion of CTBI’s market risk, see the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Market Risk included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

CTBI’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by CTBI’s management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 were effective in ensuring material information required to be disclosed in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in CTBI’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, CTBI’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	None

Item 1A.	Risk Factors

CTBI is subject to a number of risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition, including those disclosed in CTBI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, and the following additional risk factor:

~~Financial institutions, including CTBI, must transition from LIBOR~~COVID-19-Related Risk

Since March 13, 2020, the United States has been operating under a state of emergency declared by President Trump in response to ~~an alternative reference rate.~~the spread of COVID-19. COVID-19 and related governmental responses have affected economic and financial market conditions as well as the operations, results, and prospects of companies across many industries.

~~LIBOR will cease to exist as a published rate after 2021.~~ The ~~Federal Reserve through~~coronavirus pandemic has caused increased volatility in financial markets and the Alternative Reference Rate Committee has recommended a replacement benchmark rate, the Secured Overnight Financing Rate. All loans extending beyond 2021 will need to be managed to ensure appropriate benchmark rate replacements are provided forpossibility of prolonged adverse economic conditions. These changes in economic and ~~adopted. Failure to identify and negotiate a replacement benchmark rate and/or update data processing systems~~financial market conditions could result in ~~future~~decreases in demand for products, decreases in market value of loans and securities, impairments of intangible assets (such as goodwill), decreases in income due to interest rate ~~risk not being mitigated~~declines, and increases in customer delinquencies and defaults.There is uncertainty around the duration and breadth of the COVID-19 pandemic, and as ~~intended~~a result the ultimate impact on our business, financial condition or ~~interest being miscalculated, which could adversely impact CTBI’s~~operating results cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. While we expect the impacts of COVID-19 to have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, we are unable to predict the extent or nature of these impacts at this time. Public health officials have recommended and mandated precautions to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, including prohibitions on congregating in heavily populated areas and shelter-in-place orders or similar measures. As a result, we have temporarily adjusted branch operations, decreased lobby usage, encouraged drive-thru and ATM use along with internet banking, had employees work remotely or work split-shifts when possible, implemented social distancing guidelines, and consolidated operations.

Loan and Credit Losses. To combat the spread of COVID-19, and, in some cases, in response to governmental mandates to close non-essential businesses, many businesses have ceased or substantially reduced operations for an indeterminate period. In addition, individuals may have been laid off, furloughed, or be unable to work as a result of reduced business operations. AsThese situations could lead to a material change in the credit quality of our loan portfolio.

Industry Concentration. Certain industries have been or are likely to be more impacted by COVID-19 than others. The impact to the agriculture industry, bank holding companies, the hotel/motel industry, lessors of non-residential buildings, and lessors of residential buildings/dwellings could lead to significant deterioration in our asset quality.

Small and Mid-Size Business Concentration. It is expected that small and mid-size businesses, many of which rely on continuing cash flow to fund day-to-day operations, may be particularly hard hit by forced closures and other preventative measures taken by federal, state, or local governments. Although government programs have sought, and may further seek, to provide relief to these types of entities, there can be no assurance that these programs will succeed. Also, governments may continue to adopt regulations or promulgate executive orders that restrict or limit banks’ ability to take certain actions with these customers that they would otherwise take in the ordinary course—such as following standard collection and foreclosure procedures. At the same time, it may be the case that more customers are expected to draw on existing lines of credit or seek additional loans to help finance their business operations.

Capital and Liquidity. Market volatility and prolonged periods of economic stress may affect our capital and liquidity. In addition, these factors may limit access to capital markets. Risks to credit portfolios and/or increased draws on outstanding lines of credit could affect capital and liquidity at, and/or result in decreased income or increased losses for, our bank subsidiary. Changes to our capital and liquidity could lead to the need to cease or reduce dividend payments and any formal or informal actions regulators may take to address capital and liquidity concerns.

Suspension of Mortgage and Other Loan Payments and Foreclosures. The federal government signed into law on March 27, 2020 Title IV of the CARES Act, which provides that individuals with single-family, federally backed mortgages may request a 180-day mortgage forbearance (which can be extended another 180 days) due to COVID-19-related difficulties. It is possible that other states or federal regulators take similar measures. The bank implemented relief actions for our customers including suspension of residential foreclosure actions through May 18, 2020 and several loan assistance programs designed to assist those customers who are experiencing, or, are likely to experience, financial difficulties directly related to COVID-19 causing loss of individual income and/or household income. At June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we had 3,668 COVID-19 loan deferrals totaling $756.6 million

Real Estate Market and Real Estate Lending. In addition to the actions described above, there is risk that COVID-19 significantly affects the U.S. commercial and residential real estate markets and, accordingly, our real estate lending business in other ways, including through low U.S. mortgage rates (which reached an all-time low during the first quarter), decreasing property values (which, among other effects, may both increase the risk of defaults and reduce the value of real estate collateral, thereby diminishing recovery in the event of default), and reduced demand for commercial and multifamily real estate and increased vacancies if businesses fail or close locations.

Catastrophes, including Pandemics and Contagious Illnesses. The length of the COVID-19 outbreak is unknown and unpredictable and there is a potential for additional waves of COVID-19 or new strains of coronavirus even after COVID-19 appears contained in an area.

Cybersecurity. We face increased cybersecurity risks due to employees working remotely. Increased levels of remote access create additional opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities, and employees may be more susceptible to phishing and social engineering attempts due to increased stress caused by the crisis and from balancing family and work responsibilities at home. Cybercriminals may also prey on fears about COVID-19, and take advantage of the current environment in which legitimate information regarding COVID-19 is being frequently and widely disseminated, such as by including malware in emails that appear to include documents providing legitimate information for protecting oneself from COVID-19. In addition, technological resources may be strained due to the number of remote users.

Changes in Consumer Behavior. Consumers affected by COVID-19 may continue to demonstrate changed behavior even after the crisis is over. For example, consumers may decrease discretionary spending on a permanent or long-term basis, certain industries may take longer to recover (particularly those that rely on travel or large gatherings) as consumers may be hesitant to return to full social interaction, and temporary closures of bank branches could result in consumers becoming more comfortable with technology and devaluing face-to-face interaction.

Reliance on Vendors and Other Companies. We rely on vendors and other third parties to provide critical systems and services. COVID-19 presents heightened or novel risks with respect to continuity of critical services. These risks include the possibility of closure or business interruption. In addition, although in most regions subject to a stay-at-home order the definition of essential services generally includes businesses that provide essential services to banks, the definitions vary by state and may result in some vendors not being able to work from their offices.

Changes to Interest Rates. In response to COVID-19, the Federal Reserve reduced the Federal Funds Rate to zero percent in March 2020. The outlook for the remainder of 2020 is uncertain, and there is a possibility that the Federal Reserve keeps interest rates low or even uses negative interest rates if economic conditions warrant. The sudden decrease in interest rates and any risks associated with the possibility of an extended period of operations in a zero- or negative-rate environment, has the potential for significantly decreased profitability.

Other Impacts on Financial Condition. A prolonged pandemic event may have a number of effects on our financial condition. Decreases in our stock price and cash flow projections as a result of COVID-19 could result in goodwill impairment. In addition, a period of prolonged losses or decreased earnings could result in the expiration of deferred tax assets (“DTA”) before we have the opportunity to use some or all of the benefit of the DTA. Changes in our assessment of whether the full benefit of DTAs may be realized could impact our regulatory capital. We may also be at risk of being required to recognize other-than-temporary impairments and/or reduce other comprehensive income.

Impact to Investment Management Business Lines. Volatile market conditions caused by COVID-19 could reduce the value of assets under management and/or cause clients to withdraw funds.

LIBOR Transition Planning. Banking institutions have been planning for the transition away from LIBOR in advance of December 31, 2021, the date that LIBOR is generally expected to cease to exist, although the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has expressed that it and the Bank of England are assessing the impacts of COVID-19 on progress to meet the expected deadline. It remains unclear, however, whether the cessation of LIBOR will be delayed due to COVID-19 or what form any delay may take, and there are no assurances that there will be a delay. It is also unclear what the duration and severity of COVID-19 will be, and whether this will impact LIBOR transition planning. COVID-19 may also slow regulators’ and others’ efforts to develop and implement alternative reference rates, which could make LIBOR transition planning more difficult, particularly if the cessation of LIBOR is not delayed but alternatives do not develop.

PPP Loan Participation. As a participating lender in the SBA Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), CTBI ~~had approximately $29.0 million~~and CTB are subject to additional risks of litigation from CTB’s clients or other parties in ~~variable rate~~connection with the CTB’s processing of loans for the PPP and risks that the SBA may not fund some or all PPP loan guaranties.

On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was enacted, which included a $349 billion loan program administered through the SBA referred to as the PPP. Under the PPP, small businesses, eligible nonprofits and certain others can apply for loans from existing SBA lenders and other approved regulated lenders that enroll in the program, subject to numerous limitations and eligibility criteria. Under the terms of the PPP, loans are to be fully guaranteed by the SBA. CTB is participating as a lender in the PPP. Because of the short timeframe between the passing of the CARES Act and the April 3, 2020 opening of the PPP, there is some ambiguity in the laws, rules and guidance regarding the operation of the PPP, which exposes CTBI to risks relating to noncompliance with the PPP. On or about April 16, 2020, the SBA notified lenders that the $349 billion earmarked for the PPP was exhausted. Congress approved additional funding for the PPP (increasing the total to $670 billion) and the related new legislation was enacted on April 24, 2020. Since the opening of the PPP, several larger banks have been subject to litigation relating to the policies and procedures that they used in processing applications for the PPP. CTBI and CTB may be exposed to the risk of litigation, from both customers and non-customers that have approached CTB in connection with PPP loans and ~~$21.2 million~~its policies and procedures used in ~~available-for-sale securities with interest rates tied~~processing applications for the PPP. If any such litigation is filed against CTBI or CTB and is not resolved in a manner favorable to ~~LIBOR, substantially all of which have maturity dates beyond December 31, 2021.~~CTBI or CTB, it may result in significant financial liability or adversely affect CTBI’s reputation. In addition, ~~CTBI~~litigation can be costly, regardless of outcome. Any financial liability, litigation costs or reputational damage caused by PPP-related litigation could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

CTB also has ~~debentures outstanding~~credit risk on PPP loans if a determination is made by the SBA that there is a deficiency in the ~~principal~~manner in which the loan was originated, funded, or serviced by CTB, such as an issue with the eligibility of a borrower to receive a PPP loan, which may or may not be related to the ambiguity in the laws, rules and guidance regarding the operation of the PPP. In the event of a loss resulting from a default on a PPP loan and a determination by the SBA that there was a deficiency in the manner in which the PPP loan was originated, funded, or serviced by CTBI, the SBA may deny its liability under the guaranty, reduce the amount of ~~$59.3 million which mature in 2037 and bear interest at a rate tied~~the guaranty, or, if it has already paid under the guaranty, seek recovery of any loss related to ~~LIBOR.~~

Moreover, financial institution contracts linked to LIBOR are widespread and intertwined with numerous financial products and services. The downstream effect of unwinding or transitioning such contracts could cause instability and negatively impact financial markets and individual institutions. The uncertainty surrounding the ~~transition~~deficiency from ~~LIBOR could adversely affect the U.S. financial system more broadly.~~CTB.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a)

None

(b)

None

(c)

Purchases of equity securities by the issuer.

The following table presents information relating to CTBI’s purchases of its equity securities during the six months ended June 30, 2020.

Period	Total number of shares purchased	Average price paid per share	Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plan or programs (1)	Maximum number of shares that may be purchased under the plans or programs (1)
January 2020	0	$--	0	67,370
February 2020	0	--	0	67,370
March 2020	32,664	33.64	32,664	1,034,706
April 2020	0	--	0	1,034,706
May 2020	0	--	0	1,034,706
June 2020	0	--	0	1,034,706
Total	32,664	$33.64	32,664	1,034,706

(1) On March 9, 2020, the Board of Directors of CTBI approved an increase to its stock repurchase program of up to an additional 1,000,000 shares of CTBI’s outstanding common stock. At the time the increase was approved, there were 67,370 shares remaining under CTBI’s existing stock repurchase program, which began in December 1998 with the authorization to acquire up to 500,000 shares and was increased by an additional 1,000,000 shares in July 2000 and May 2003. As of June 30, 2020, a total of 2,465,294 shares have been repurchased through this program.

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	None

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	Not applicable

Item 5.	Other Information:
	CTBI’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have furnished to the SEC the certifications with respect to this Form 10-Q that are required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Item 6.	Exhibits:
	(1) Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Exhibit 31.1 Exhibit 31.2
	(2) Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Exhibit 32.1 Exhibit 32.2
	(3) XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL	Exhibit 101.INS
	(4) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	Exhibit 101.SCH
	(5) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase	Exhibit 101.CAL
	(6) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase	Exhibit 101.DEF
	(7) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase	Exhibit 101.LAB
	(8) XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase	Exhibit 101.PRE
	(9) Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)	Exhibit 104

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, CTBI has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC.

Date: August ~~8, 2019~~7, 2020	By:

	/s/ Jean R. Hale
	Jean R. Hale
	Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer

	/s/ Kevin J. Stumbo
	Kevin J. Stumbo
	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
	and Treasurer

	June 30, 2018
(in thousands)	Recorded Balance		Unpaid Contractual Principal Balance		Specific Allowance
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial construction	$	4,299	$	4,299	$	0
Commercial secured by real estate		29,718		31,653		0
Commercial other		8,606		10,250		0
Real estate mortgage		1,621		1,621		0

Loans with a specific valuation allowance:
Commercial secured by real estate		2,156		3,277		807
Commercial other		343		343		100

Totals:
Commercial construction		4,299		4,299		0
Commercial secured by real estate		31,874		34,930		807
Commercial other		8,949		10,593		100
Real estate mortgage		1,621		1,621		0
Total	$	46,743	$	51,443	$	907

	Year Ended December 31, 2018
(in thousands)	Number of Loans		Term Modification		Rate Modification		Combination		Post- Modification Outstanding Balance
Commercial:
Commercial construction		5	$	2,182	$	0	$	15	$	2,197
Commercial secured by real estate		24		4,004		0		1,383		5,387
Commercial other		8		465		0		0		465
Residential:
Real estate construction		0		0		0		0		0
Real estate mortgage		3		264		0		704		968
Total troubled debt restructurings		40	$	6,915	$	0	$	2,102	$	9,017

(in thousands)	Operating Leases			Finance Leases
2019	$	813		$	34
2020		1,647			67
2021		1,668			75
2022		1,654			75
2023		1,575			75
Thereafter		10,895			2,060
Total lease payments		18,252			2,386
Less imputed interest		(4,171	)		(923	)
Total	$	14,081		$	1,463

(in thousands)	Operating Lease Payments
2019	$	1,999
2020		1,710
2021		1,737
2022		1,760
2023		1,696
Thereafter		13,031
Total	$	21,933