UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

_________________

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x[X]

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE ~~SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934~~

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2005~~2006

o[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF ~~THESECURITIES~~THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___ to ___.

Commission file number 0-29794

PUBLICARD, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania		23-0991870
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

One Rockefeller Plaza, 14^th Floor, New York, NY		10020
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (212) 651-3102

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes xX No o__.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, ~~(as defined~~or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange ~~Act).~~Act. (Check one):

~~Yes~~ o Large accelerated filer ___ Accelerated filer ___ Non-accelerated filer No xX

Indicate by check whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o __ No No xX

Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of November ~~14, 2005:~~16, 2006: 24,940,902

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PUBLICARD, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF

SEPTEMBER 30, ~~2005~~2006 AND DECEMBER 31, ~~2004~~2005

(in thousands, except share data)

(Unaudited)

	September 30, 2005			December 31, 2004			September 30,			December 31,
	(unaudited)						2006			2005
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash, including short-term investments of $697 and $1,837 in 2005
and 2004, respectively	$	750		$	1,943
Trade receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $16 and $48
in 2005 and 2004, respectively		801			827
Inventories		348			558
Prepaid insurance and other		594			440
Cash, including short-term investments of $229 and $989 in 2006 and
2005, respectively							$	247		$	1,072
Trade receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $17 and $16
in 2006 and 2005, respectively								733			647
Inventories, net of reserve of $60 and $56 in 2006 and 2005, respectively								247			303
Other current assets								70			573
Total current assets		2,493			3,768			1,297			2,595

Equipment and leasehold improvements, net		62			127			24			47
Goodwill		782			782
Other assets		-			396
	$	3,337		$	5,073		$	1,321		$	2,642

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

Current liabilities:
Overdraft payable	$	484		$	347		$	564		$	406
Trade accounts payable		637			1,011			617			592
Accrued liabilities		1,113			1,005			916			1,067
Current portion of note payable (Note 1)								25			-
Total current liabilities		2,234			2,363			2,122			2,065

Note payable		7,501			7,501
Note payable (Note 1)								-			7,501
Other non-current liabilities		209			368			219			227

Total liabilities		9,944			10,232			2,341			9,793

Commitments and contingencies (Note 4)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 3)

Shareholders’ deficiency:
Class A Preferred Stock, Second Series, no par value: 1,000 shares authorized; 465
and 565 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2005
and December 31, 2004, respectively		2,325			2,825
Common shares, $0.10 par value: 40,000,000 shares authorized; 24,940,902 and
24,690,902 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2005 and
December 31, 2004, respectively		2,494			2,469
shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005								2,325			2,325
Common shares, $0.10 par value: 40,000,000 shares authorized; 24,940,902
shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005								2,494			2,494
Additional paid-in capital		108,594			108,119			108,617			108,594
Accumulated deficit		(119,960	)		(118,476	)		(114,309	)		(120,507	)
Other comprehensive loss		(60	)		(96	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss								(147	)		(57	)
Total shareholders’ deficiency		(6,607	)		(5,159	)		(1,020	)		(7,151	)
	$	3,337		$	5,073		$	1,321		$	2,642

The accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

PUBLICARD, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ~~2005~~2006 AND ~~2004~~2005

(in thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						September 30,						September 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004			2006			2005			2006			2005

Revenues	$	1,029		$	1,260		$	2,689		$	3,116		$	887		$	1,029		$	2,434		$	2,689

Cost of revenues		428			530			1,220			1,416			412			429			1,143			1,220
Gross margin		601			730			1,469			1,700			475			600			1,291			1,469

Operating expenses:
General and administrative		515			568			1,537			1,840			387			514			1,296			1,537
Sales and marketing		247			365			929			1,190			249			248			769			929
Product development		150			173			489			522			156			149			441			489
Amortization of intangibles		-			10			-			30
		912			1,116			2,955			3,582			792			911			2,506			2,955
Loss from operations		(311	)		(386	)		(1,486	)		(1,882	)		(317	)		(311	)		(1,215	)		(1,486	)

Other income (expenses):
Interest income		7			6			21			18			5			7			13			21
Interest expense		(8	)		(6	)		(19	)		(16	)		(9	)		(8	)		(25	)		(19	)
Cost of pensions - non-operating		-			(132	)		-			(396	)
Loss on pension settlement		-			(2,739	)		-			(2,739	)
Gain on insurance recoveries		-			170			-			647
Other income, net		-			5			-			-
Other income														182			-			205			-
														178			(1	)		193			(2	)
Net loss from continuing operations													$	(139	)	$	(312	)	$	(1,022	)	$	(1,484	)

Extraordinary gain on settlement with the PBGC													$	7,220		$	-		$	7,220			-
Net income (loss)													$	7,081		$	(312	)	$	6,198		$	(1,484	)
		(1	)		(2,696	)		2			(2,486	)

Net loss	$	(312	)	$	(3,082	)	$	(1,484	)	$	(4,368	)


Basic and diluted loss per common share	$	(.01	)	$	(.12	)	$	(.06	)	$	(.18	)
Basic and diluted income (loss) per Common Share from
Continuing Operations													$	(.01	)	$	(.01	)	$	(.05	)	$	(.06	)
Gain on settlement with the PBGC													$	.29		$	.		$	.30			-
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share													$	.28		$	(.01	)	$	.25		$	(.06	)

Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		24,753,402			24,690,902			24,715,902			24,690,902			24,940,902			24,690,902			24,940,902			24,690,902

The accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

PUBLICARD, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIENCY

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ~~2005~~2006

(in thousands, except share data)

(unaudited)

Class A

Common Shares

Additional

Other
Comprehen-

Total
Share-

Preferred Shares Paid-in Accumulated sive holders’
Stock Issued Amount Capital Deficit Loss Deficiency

Balance - January 1, 2005 $ 2,825 24,690,902 $ 2,469 $ 108,119 $ (118,476 ) $ (96 ) $ (5,159 )

Conversion of preferred stock (500 ) 250,000 25 475 - - -

Comprehensive loss:
Net loss - - - - (1,484 ) - (1,484 )
Foreign currency translation adjustment
-

-

-

-

-

36

36

Comprehensive loss (1,448 )

Balance - September 30, 2005 $ 2,325 24,940,902 $ 2,494 $ 108,594 $ (119,960 ) $ (60 ) $ (6,607 )

												Accumulated
	Class A		Common Shares				Additional					Other Comprehen-			Total Share-
	Preferred		Shares				Paid-in		Accumulated			sive			holders’
	Stock		Issued		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Loss			Deficiency

Balance - January 1, 2006	$	2,325		24,940,902	$	2,494	$	108,594	$	(120,507	)	$	(57	)	$	(7,151	)

Compensation cost related to grant of stock options								23								23
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income		-		-		-		-		6,198			-			6,198
Foreign currency translation adjustment		-		-		-		-		-			(90	)		(90	)
Comprehensive income																6,108

Balance - September 30, 2006	$	2,325		24,940,902	$	2,494	$	108,617	$	(114,309	)	$	(147	)	$	(1,020	)

The accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of this statement.

PUBLICARD, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, ~~2005~~2006 AND ~~2004~~2005

(in thousands)

(unaudited)

	2005			2004			2006			2005

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1,484	)	$	(4,368	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used
Net income/(loss)							$	6,198		$	(1,484	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used
in operating activities:
Loss on pension settlement		-			2,739
Gain on insurance recoveries		-			(647	)
Amortization of intangibles		-			30
Compensation cost from issuance of stock options								23			-
Gain on insurance recovery								(205	)		-
Gain on settlement with the PBGC								(7,220	)		-
Loss on disposal of equipment								4			-
Depreciation and amortization		63			94			28			63
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables		(43	)		44			19			(43	)
Inventories		173			69			96			173
Prepaid insurance and other current assets		141			230
Other current assets								249			141
Trade accounts payable		(325	)		(332	)		(39	)		(325	)
Accrued liabilities		75			1,029			(256	)		75
Other non-current liabilities		(15	)		(675	)		(8	)		(15	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(1,415	)		(1,787	)		(1,111	)		(1,415	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from insurance recoveries								461			52
Capital expenditures		-			(49	)		(5	)		-
Proceeds from insurance recoveries		52			531
Other		(3	)		5			-			(3	)
Net cash provided by investing activities		49			487			456			49

Cash flows from financing activities
Increase in overdraft payable		172			61
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of Long Term Debt Proceeds from overdraft facility								(256) 85			0 172
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities								(171	)		172

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		1			1			1			1

Net decrease in cash		(1,193	)		(1,238	)		(825	)		(1,193	)
Cash - beginning of period		1,943			3,580
Cash - end of period	$	750		$	2,342
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period								1,072			1,943
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period							$	247		$	750


Cash paid for interest	$	19		$	16		$	19	��	$	19
Cash paid for taxes	$	8		$	-		$	5		$	8

The accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.

PUBLICARD, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND LIQUIDITY AND GOING CONCERN CONSIDERATIONS

Description of the business

PubliCARD, Inc. (“PubliCARD” or the “Company”) was incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 1913. PubliCARD entered the smart card industry in early 1998, and began to develop solutions for the conditional access, security, payment system and data storage needs of industries utilizing smart card technology. In 1998 and 1999, the Company made a series of acquisitions to enhance its position in the smart card industry. In March 2000, PubliCARD’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), together with its management team, determined to integrate its operations and focus on deploying smart card solutions, which facilitate secure access and transactions. To effect this new business strategy, in March 2000, the Board adopted a plan of disposition pursuant to which the Company divested its non-core operations.

In July 2001, after evaluating the timing of potential future revenues, PubliCARD’s Board decided to shift the Company’s strategic focus. While the Board remained confident in the long-term prospects of the smart card business, the timing of public sector and corporate initiatives in wide-scale, broadband environments utilizing the Company’s smart card reader and chip products had become more uncertain. Given the lengthened time horizon, the Board did not believe it would be prudent to continue to invest the Company’s current resources in the ongoing development and marketing of these technologies. Accordingly, the Board determined that shareholders' interests would be best served by pursuing strategic alliances with one or more companies that have the resources to capitalize more fully on the Company's smart card reader and chip-related technologies. In connection with this shift in the Company’s strategic focus, workforce reductions and other measures were implemented to achieve cost savings.

1998. At present, PubliCARD’s sole operating activities are conducted through its Infineer Ltd. subsidiary (“Infineer”), which designs smart card solutions for educational and corporate sites. The Company’s future plans revolve around a potential acquisition strategy that would focus on businesses in areas outside the high technology sector while continuing to support the expansion of the Infineer business. However, the Company will not be able to implement such plans unless it is successful in obtaining funding, as to which no assurance can be given.

Liquidity and Going Concern Considerations

~~These unaudited condensed~~

The consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q contemplate the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As a result of the factors described below, it is unlikely that the Company will be able to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The independent auditors’ reports on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002 contain emphasis paragraphs concerning substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Infineer has continued to incur operating losses and negative cash flow. During 2003, 2004 and 2005, the Company contributed additional capital to Infineer of $70,000, $225,000 and $150,000, respectively. It is likely that Infineer will require additional capital and the Company does not have the financial resources to provide such support. Given the Company’s lack of available resources, continued operating losses and bank overdraft, the Company has begun to consider various alternatives. In 2006, with the assistance of an investment banker, the Company commenced an assessment of the value of Infineer, developed an information memorandum and obtained offers for Infineer’s potential for sale. This process concluded without a viable offer for the business. The Board of Directors has not decided whether to continue with the disposition effort. It is therefore uncertain whether an acceptable offer will materialize or whether any such sale will ultimately be consummated. Any such determination to dispose of Infineer would depend upon, among other things, the amount of potential proceeds of any such sale and require the approval of the Company’s shareholders.

The Company sponsored a defined benefit pension plan (the “Plan”) that was frozen in 1993. In January 2003, the Company filed a notice with the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) seeking a “distress termination” of that Plan. Pursuant to the Agreement for Appointment of Trustee and Termination of Plan between the PBGC and the Company, effective September 30, 2004, the PBGC proceeded to terminate the Plan and was appointed as the Plan’s trustee. As a result, the PBGC has assumed responsibility for paying the obligations to Plan participants. As a result of the Plan termination, the Company’s 2003 and 2004 funding requirements due to the Plan amounting to $3.4 million through September 15, 2004 were eliminated.

Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, effective September 23, 2004, between the PBGC and the Company (the “Settlement Agreement”), the Company was liable to the PBGC for the unfunded guaranteed benefit payable by the PBGC to Plan participants in the amount of $7.5 million. The Company satisfied this liability by issuing a non-interest bearing note (the “Note”), dated September 23, 2004, payable to the PBGC with a face amount of $7.5 million. Pursuant to the Security Agreement and Pledge Agreement, both dated September 23, 2004, the Note was secured by (a) all presently owned or thereafter acquired real or personal property and rights to property of the Company and (b) the common and preferred stock of Infineer and TecSec, Incorporated (“TecSec”) owned by the Company.

On July 27, 2006, the Company entered into a Payment, Retirement and Release Agreement (the “Payment Agreement”) with the PBGC pursuant to which the PBGC and the Company provided for the settlement and discharge of the Company’s obligations under the Settlement Agreement and the Note. Pursuant to the Payment Agreement, the Company paid the $256,391.31 on July 27, 2006, and agreed that if, between July 27, 2006 and July 27, 2011, the Company receives Net Proceeds in excess of $250,000, the Company will pay to the PBGC 50% of the amount of such excess. As defined in the Payment Agreement, “Net Proceeds” means the amount received by the Company in cash or marketable securities, less the amount of reasonable transaction costs and expenses and debt paid, retained or assumed, from any of (i) the sale by the Company of any or all capital stock of Infineer; (ii) the sale by Infineer of all or substantially all of its assets and a distribution of the proceeds of such sale to the Company; (iii) the sale by the Company of any or all capital stock of Tecsec; and (iv) proceeds received by the Company from settlements, buyouts or assignments of claims with respect to insurance policies covering environmental liabilities for which claims were made prior to July 27, 2006. The Payment Agreement further provides that if, on July 27, 2011, the Company exists as a going concern and holds capital stock of Infineer (and Infineer exists as a going concern) or Tecsec (and Tecsec exists as a going concern), the Company will be deemed to have sold such capital stock for its fair market value, which shall be added to Net Proceeds for purposes of determining the amount of additional payments to the PBGC, if any.

On October 13, 2006, the Company entered into an Assignment of Shares and Assumption of Obligations agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”) with Sallyport Investment Partnership (“Sallyport”), pursuant to which the Company assigned 60,058 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Tecsec to Sallyport in exchange for $150,000. In addition, pursuant to the Assignment Agreement, Sallyport agreed to use its best efforts to transfer to the Company or cause to be issued to the Company shares of common stock of Tecsec representing 2 ½% of Tecsec’s common stock, calculated on a fully-diluted basis and giving effect to shares that may be issued as a result of Sallyport’s financing of Tecsec during the current year. On October 13, 2006, Tecsec confirmed its agreement to issue such shares to the Company.

The future payments to the PBGC, based on the proceeds from the Assignment Agreement and the Company’s projection of future insurance recoveries of $150,000, are anticipated to be $25,000 although no assurance can be given that this will be the case, and are included in Note Payable. As a result of this settlement of the liability to the PBGC, the Company has recognized a $7.2 million gain on its Statement of Operations. Given the Company’s current financial position, it does not believe that any additional payments will be due to the PBGC on July 27, 2011.

PUBLICARD, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company has incurred operating losses, a substantial decline in working capital and negative cash flow from operations for a number of years. The Company has also experienced a substantial reduction in its cash and short term investments, which declined from $17.0 million at December 31, 2000 to ~~$750,000~~$247,000 at September 30, ~~2005.~~2006. The Company also had a shareholders’ deficiency of ~~$6.6 million at~~$1,020,000 as of September 30, ~~2005.~~2006.

The Company sponsored a defined benefit pension plan (the “Plan”) that was frozen in 1993. In January 2003, the Company filed a notice with the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (the “PBGC”) seeking a “distress termination” of the Plan. In September 2004, the PBGC proceeded to terminate the Plan and was appointed as the Plan’s trustee. See Note 3 for further information on the Plan termination. As a result of the Plan termination, the Company’s 2003 and 2004 funding requirements due to the Plan amounting to $3.4 million through September 15, 2004 were eliminated. As such, managementManagement believes that existing cash and ~~short term~~short-term investments ~~may~~will not be sufficient to meet the Company’s operating and capital requirements at the currently anticipated levels through March 31, 2006. However, additional capital will be necessary in order to operate beyond March 31, 2006 and to fund the current business plan and other obligations. Whilepermit the Company ~~is considering various funding alternatives,~~to continue operating past the ~~Company has not secured or entered into any arrangements to obtain additional funds. There can be no assurance that~~first quarter of 2007 and the Company will ~~be able to obtain additional funding on acceptable terms or at all.~~likely cease operations. If a sale of Infineer is consummated, the Company ~~cannot raise additional capital to continue its present level of operations it is~~will not ~~likely to be able to meet its obligations, take advantage of future acquisition opportunities or further develop or enhance its product offering,~~thereafter have any ~~of which would have a material adverse effect on its~~ongoing business ~~and results of operations and is likely to lead~~operations. In either case, the Company does not expect that any funds will be available for distribution to seek bankruptcy protection. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The independent auditors’ reports on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 contained emphasis paragraphs concerning substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

~~PUBLICARD, INC.~~

~~AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES~~its shareholders.

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PubliCARD and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Basis of presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company and its subsidiary companies as of September 30, ~~2005~~2006 and the results of their operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2005.~~2006. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2004.~~2005.

Earnings (loss) per common share

Basic net income (loss) per common share is based on net income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share assumes issuance of the net incremental shares from stock options and convertible preferred stock at the later of the beginning of the year or date of issuance. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2005,~~2006, diluted net income (loss) per share was the same as basic net income (loss) per share since the effect of stock options and convertible preferred stock were antidilutive. Shares issuable pursuant to stock options and convertible preferred stock were ~~3,589,850~~6,416,925 and ~~3,841,975~~3,589,850 as of September 30, 2006 and 2005, ~~and 2004,~~ respectively. At September 30, 2006, the 2,837,075 options granted during the quarter then ended remained unvested.

Revenue recognition and accounts receivable.

Revenue from product sales and technology and software license fees is recorded upon shipment if a signed contract exists, the fee is fixed and determinable, the collection of the resulting receivable is probable and the Company has no obligation to install the product or solution. If the Company is responsible for installation, revenue from product sales and license fees is deferred and recognized upon client acceptance or “go live” date. Maintenance and support fees are deferred and recognized as revenue ratably over the contract period. Provisions are recorded for estimated warranty repairs and returns at the time the products are shipped. Should changes in conditions cause management to determine that revenue recognition criteria are not met for certain future transactions, revenue recognized for any reporting period could be adversely affected.

PUBLICARD, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer's credit worthiness. The Company continually monitors collections and payments from its customers and maintains a provision for estimated credit losses based upon historical experience and any specific customer collection issues that it has identified. While such credit losses have historically been within management’s expectations and the provisions established, there is no assurance that the Company will continue to experience the same credit loss rates as in the past.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. The Company periodically evaluates the need to record adjustments for impairment of inventory. Inventory in excess of the Company’s estimated usage requirements is written down to its estimated net realizable value. Inherent in the estimates of net realizable value are management’s estimates related to the Company’s production schedules, customer demand, possible alternative uses and the ultimate realization of potentially excess inventory. Inventories as of September 30, ~~2005~~2006 and December 31, ~~2004~~2005 consisted of the following (in thousands):

	2006			2005

Raw materials and work-in-process	$	235		$	254
Finished goods		72			95
		307			359
Inventory Reserve		(60	)		(56	)
	$	247		$	303

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.” This statement requires compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions to be recognized in financial statements. Generally, compensation cost will be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards will be remeasured each reporting period. Compensation cost is recognized over the requisite service period, generally as the award vests. Pro forma disclosure of the income statement effects of share-based payments is no longer an alternative. The Company has elected the modified prospective transition method as permitted by SFAS No. 123(R), in which compensation cost is recognized beginning with the effective date based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all share-based payments granted after January 1, 2006, and based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123 for all awards granted to employees prior to that date that remained unvested upon adoption of SFAS No. 123(R). Compensation expense related to share-based awards is recognized over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. The adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements since there were no previously granted awards unvested as of the adoption date.

On July 21, 2006, the Company entered into an Engagement Agreement (as amended, the “Engagement Agreement”) with Joseph Sarachek. Pursuant to the Engagement Agreement, Mr. Sarachek was appointed to the Company’s Board of Directors on July 21, 2006. Also pursuant to the Agreement, Mr. Sarachek was appointed as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, effective July 31, 2006.

Pursuant to the Engagement Agreement, Mr. Sarachek was granted options (the “Initial Options”) to purchase 2,837,075 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.0279 per share, the fair value of the Company’s stock on the date of the grant. 1,793,650 of the Initial Options were granted under the Company’s 1999 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Long Term Incentive Plan”), and 1,043,425 of the Initial Options were granted pursuant to a Non-Plan Stock Option Agreement between Mr. Sarachek and the Company, dated as of July 21, 2006. All of the Initial Options will vest upon the consummation of a sale of the Company or other restructuring or similar transaction involving the Company, as defined in the Engagement Agreement. The Company has recognized compensation expense for the Initial Options under the guidelines set forth in SFAS No. 123(R), amounting to $20,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Following the consummation of any such transaction, Mr. Sarachek will be granted additional options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock, which options will be exercisable into shares of the Company’s common stock representing (when taken together with the Initial Options) 10% of the Company’s outstanding common stock, calculated on a fully-diluted basis. Such options will be exercisable when granted. The Agreement also provides that, upon consummation of any such transaction, Mr. Sarachek will be entitled to receive a cash transaction fee in an amount equal to a percentage of the aggregate value of such transaction received by the Company or its shareholders ranging from 4% to 7%.

On August 24, 2006, the Company issued 150,000 options to its Directors under the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan. The Company issued these options to each of its directors at an exercise price of $0.03 per share, which represents the fair value per share at the date of the grant. These options vested immediately upon issuance, and have an expiration date of August 4, 2011. The Company recognized $3,000 of expense associated with the issuance of these options.

PUBLICARD, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

2005

2004

Raw materials and work-in-process $ 254 $ 468
Finished goods 94 90
$ 348 $ 558

~~Goodwill and intangibles~~

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to the net tangible and intangible assets relating to the November 1999 acquisition of Infineer. Through December 31, 2001, goodwill had been amortized over a five year life. Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”). In accordance with the guidelines of this statement, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer amortized but will be assessed for impairment on at least an annual basis. SFAS No. 142 also requires that intangible assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment.

The Company determines the fair value of its sole reporting unit primarily using two approaches: a market approach technique and a discounted cash flow valuation technique. The market approach relies primarily on the implied fair value using a multiple of revenues for several entities with comparable operations and economic characteristics. Significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuation include estimates of future cash flows, future short-term and long-term growth rates and estimated cost of capital for purposes of arriving at a discount factor. The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment test during the fourth quarter absent any interim impairment indicators. The carrying value of goodwill as of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 was $782,000.

~~Stock-Based Compensation~~

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation cost using the intrinsic value method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB No. 25”). The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123”) and SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure” (“SFAS No. 148”).

At September 30, 2005, the Company had four fixed stock-based compensation plans. The exercise price of each option granted pursuant to these plans is equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Accordingly, pursuant to APB No. 25,no compensation cost has been recognized for such grants. Had compensation cost been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for such awards consistent with the method prescribed by SFAS No. 123, the Company's net (loss) income and (loss) income per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 would have been as follows (in thousands except per share data):

Three months ended

Nine months ended

September 30,

September 30,

2005

2004

2005

2004

Net loss, as reported $ (312 ) $ (3,082 ) $ (1,484 ) $ (4,368 )
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense
determined under fair value based method (4 ) (35 ) (4 ) (95 )
Pro forma net loss $ (316 ) $ (3,117 ) $ (1,488 ) $ (4,463 )

Basic and diluted loss per share:
As reported $ (.01 ) $ (.12 ) $ (.06 ) $ (.18 )
Pro forma $ (.01 ) $ (.13 ) $ (.06 ) $ (.18 )

~~PUBLICARD, INC.~~

~~AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

For purposes of computing the ~~pro forma disclosure,~~share based compensation, the fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used to estimate the value of the ~~options~~share-based grants are as follows:

	2006			2005
Expected option term (years)		5.0-10.0			5.0
Expected volatility		100.0	%		165.0	%
Risk-free interest rate		5.0	%		4.1	%
Weighted average fair value per option	$	.03		$	.02

Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for employee share-based compensation awards using the intrinsic value method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB No. 25”). Under APB No. 25, no share-based compensation expense was reflected in the statement of operations as a result of stock option grants because each option granted pursuant to the Company’s plans had an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. There were no stock option grants impacting compensation cost for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. As such, there is no difference between the Company’s reported net loss and loss per share and pro forma net loss and loss per share computed consistent with the method prescribed by SFAS No. 123 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005.

Foreign Currency Translation

The local currency of the Company's foreign (United Kingdom) subsidiary is its functional currency. Assets and liabilities of the Company's foreign subsidiary are translated into U.S. dollars at the current exchange rate. Statement of operations accounts are translated at the average rate of exchange prevailing during the year. Translation adjustments arising from the use of differing exchange rates from period to period are a component of accumulated comprehensive loss included in shareholders' equity.

Income Taxes

The Company follows SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”). Under the ~~pro forma~~asset and liability method of SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Since the ~~weighted average~~Company has no recent history of continuing profits, it is unlikely that the future benefit of these losses will be recognized. Thus, a full valuation allowance has been recorded. As of December 31, 2005, approximately $61.7 million of U.S. tax loss carryforwards (subject to review by the Internal Revenue Service), expiring from 2006 through 2025, were available to offset future taxable income. Therefore, the Company did not record any tax provision on its income generated during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Concentration of Credit Risk

The carrying amount of financial instruments, including cash and short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximates fair value. The fair value of long-term debt is estimated based on current rates which could be offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturity. The estimated fair value of ~~an option granted are~~the Company’s Note Payable as ~~follows:~~of September 30, 2006 was approximately $25,000. See above for discussion regarding the retirement of the Note to the PBGC.

Financial instruments that subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and short-term investments and accounts receivable. The Company maintains all of its cash and short-term investments with high-credit quality financial institutions. The Company’s customer base consists of businesses principally in Europe (with a concentration in the United Kingdom) and the United States. For the nine months ended September 30, 2006, no single customer accounted for 10% or more of revenues. Balances due from one customer accounted for approximately 10% of the accounts receivable balance as of September 30, 2006.

2005
2004
Expected option term (years) 5.0 5.0
Expected volatility 165.0% 353.0%
Risk-free interest rate 4.1% 3.7%
Weighted average fair value per option $.02 $.06

PUBLICARD, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Use of Estimates

The preparation of these financial statements required the use of certain estimates by management in determining the Company’s assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Certain of the Company’s accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. The Company considers certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition and estimates of reserves for receivables and inventories ~~and valuation of goodwill~~ to be critical policies due to the estimation processes involved. While all available information has been considered, actual amounts could differ from those reported.

~~Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Concentration of Credit Risk~~

The carrying amount of financial instruments, including cash and short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximates fair value. The fair value of long-term debt is estimated based on current rates which could be offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturity. The estimated fair value of the Company’s long term debt as of September 30, 2005 was approximately $2.2 million.

Financial instruments that subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and short-term investments and accounts receivable. The Company maintains all of its cash and short-term investments with high-credit quality financial institutions. The Company’s customer base consists of businesses principally in Europe (with a concentration in the United Kingdom) and the United States. For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2005, no one customer accounted for more than 10% of revenues. In addition, no one customer accounted for more than 10% of the accounts receivable balance as of September 30, 2005.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment.” This statement requires compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions to be recognized in financial statements. Generally, compensation cost will be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards will be remeasured each reporting period. Compensation cost will be recognized over the requisite service period, generally as the award vests. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 123R in the first quarter of 2006. SFAS No. 123R applies to all awards granted after the effective date and to previously-granted awards unvested as of the adoption date. The adoption of the statement is not expected to have a material impact on Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

~~PUBLICARD, INC.~~

~~AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Cost, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter ~~4.”~~4”. This statement amends Accounting Research Bulletin No. 43 to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted material (spoilage). The provision of the statement is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of the statement isdid not ~~expected to~~ have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29.” This statement amends APB No. 29, “Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions,” to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets under APB No. 29 and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. The statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of the statement isdid not ~~expected to~~ have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3". This statement provides guidance on the accounting for and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes, unless impracticable, retrospective application as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle in the absence of explicit transition requirements specific to the newly adopted accounting principle. This statement also provides guidance for determining whether retrospective application of a change in accounting principle is impracticable and for reporting a change when retrospective application is impracticable. SFAS No. 154 is effective for accounting changes and correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The ~~adoption of the statement is~~Company currently does not ~~expected to have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.~~

~~Reclassifications~~

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Company reported the change~~contemplate any voluntary changes in the overdraft facility as a component of operating activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. In order to conform to the current period presentation, the Company has reclassified the $61,000 increase in the overdraft for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 to a component of financing activities.accounting principles.

Note 2 - SEGMENT DATA

The Company’s sole operating activities involve the deployment of smart card solutions for educational and corporate sites. As such, the Company reports as a single segment. Sales by geographical areas for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2005~~2006 and ~~2004~~2005 are as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30				Nine months ended September 30,				Three months ended September 30				Nine months ended September 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004		2006		2005		2006		2005

United Kingdom	$	795	$	872	$	1,856	$	2,067	$	650	$	795	$	1,613	$	1,856
United States		89		155		327		326		46		89		303		327
Europe (excluding United Kingdom)		119		213		434		543		173		119		426		434
Rest of world		26		20		72		180		18		26		92		72
	$	1,029	$	1,260	$	2,689	$	3,116	$	887	$	1,029	$	2,434	$	2,689

PUBLICARD, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company has operations in the United States and United Kingdom. Identifiable tangible assets by country as of September 30, ~~2005~~2006 and December 31, ~~2004~~2005 are as follows (in thousands):

	2005		2004		2006		2005

United States	$	1,340	$	2,770	$	299	$	1,647
United Kingdom		1,215		1,521		1,022		995
	$	2,555	$	4,291	$	1,321	$	2,642

Note 3 ~~- TERMINATED PENSION PLAN~~

The Company sponsored a defined benefit pension plan that was frozen in 1993. In January 2003, the Company filed a notice with the PBGC seeking a “distress termination” of the Plan. Pursuant to the Agreement for Appointment of Trustee and Termination of Plan between the PBGC and the Company, effective September 30, 2004, the PBGC proceeded to terminate the Plan and was appointed as the Plan’s trustee. As a result, the PBGC has assumed responsibility for paying the obligations to Plan participants. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, effective September 23, 2004, between the PBGC and the Company (the “Settlement Agreement”), the Company is liable to the PBGC for the unfunded guaranteed benefit payable by the PBGC to Plan participants in the amount of $7.5 million. The Company satisfied this liability by issuing a non-interest bearing note (the “Note”), dated September 23, 2004, payable to the PBGC with a face amount of $7.5 million. A loss on the termination of the Plan of $2.7 million was recorded in the third quarter of 2004.

Pursuant to the Security Agreement and Pledge Agreement, both dated September 23, 2004, the Note is secured by (a) all presently owned or hereafter acquired real or personal property and rights to property of the Company and (b) the common and preferred stock of Infineer and TecSec Incorporated (“TecSec”) owned by the Company. Infineer is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company has an approximately 5% ownership interest in TecSec, on a fully diluted basis.

The Note matures on September 23, 2011. The first payment will be equal to $1.0 million and will become due 30 days after the Company has received a total of $4.0 million in Net Recoveries (as defined below). Thereafter, on each anniversary of the first payment, the Company is required to pay the PBGC an amount equal to 25% of the Net Recoveries in excess of $4.0 million (less the sum of all prior payments made in accordance with this sentence in prior years). Net Recoveries, as defined in the Settlement Agreement, is the net cash proceeds received by the Company with respect to transactions consummated after March 31, 2003 from (a) the sale of the Company’s interest in Infineer and TecSec, real property in Louisiana and any other real or personal property assets and (b) any recoveries from the Company’s historic insurance program. As of September 30, 2005, Net Recoveries was approximately $3.5 million.

In the event of default by the Company under the Settlement Agreement, the PBGC may declare the outstanding amount of the Note to be immediately due and payable, proceed with foreclosure of the liens granted in favor of the PBGC and exercise any other rights available under applicable law.

As a result of the termination of the Plan, net periodic pension cost will be zero prospectively. Cost of retirement benefits - non-operating of $396,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 included the net periodic pension cost and other Plan related expenses. The components of the net periodic pension cost for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 were as follows (in thousands):

Interest cost $ 348
Expected return on plan assets (87 )
Amortization of net loss 84
Net periodic pension cost $ 345

~~PUBLICARD, INC.~~

~~AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~Note 4~~ - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases

The Company leases certain office space, vehicles and office equipment under operating leases that expire over the next three years. Minimum payments for operating leases having initial or remaining non-cancelable terms in excess of one year aggregate approximately $187,000.

Grants and bank financing

Infineer has received grants from several government agencies in the United Kingdom. These grants have been used for marketing, research and development and other governmental business incentives such as general employment. Such grants require Infineer to maintain certain levels of operations and employment in Northern Ireland. As of September 30, ~~2005,~~2006, Infineer has a contingent liability to repay, in whole or in part, grants received of approximately ~~$260,000~~$222,000 in the event Infineer becomes insolvent or otherwise violates the terms of such grants. As of September 30, ~~2005,~~2006, Infineer is in compliance with the terms of the grants.

Infineer has an overdraft facility with a bank in Northern Ireland, which allows for the maximum borrowing of 320,000 British pounds. This facility is secured by all of Infineer’s assets and bears an interest rate at the bank’s base rate plus 2% (approximately ~~6.50%~~6.75% at September 30, ~~2005)~~2006). As of September 30, ~~2005,~~2006, Infineer had borrowings outstanding under this facility totaling ~~277,000~~approximately 300,000 British pounds (or the equivalent of ~~$484,000)~~approximately $564,000).

Legal

On May 28, 2002, a lawsuit was filed against the Company and four of its current and former directors and executive officers in the Superior Court of the State of California, in the County of Los Angeles by Leonard M. Ross and affiliated entities alleging, among other things, misrepresentation and securities fraud (the “Lawsuit”). The plaintiffs sought compensatory and punitive damages for alleged actions of the defendants in order to induce the plaintiff to purchase, hold or refrain from selling shares of the Company’s common stock. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants made a series of material misrepresentations, misleading statements, omissions and concealments, specifically and directly to the plaintiffs concerning the nature, existence and status of contracts with certain purchasers, the nature and existence of investments in the Company by third parties, the nature and existence of business relationships and investments by the Company.

In November 2002, the Company and the individual defendants served with the Lawsuit filed a demurrer seeking the dismissal of six of the plaintiffs’ nine purported causes of action. In January 2003, the court ruled in favor of the demurrer and dismissed the entire complaint. The plaintiffs were granted the right to replead and subsequently filed an amended complaint in February 2003. The Company and individual defendants filed a second demurrer in March 2003. In June 2003, the court ruled in favor of the demurrer and dismissed, without leave to amend, six of the eleven purported causes of action in the amended complaint. The parties to the Lawsuit subsequently began the document discovery process and responded to interrogatories.

The parties to the Lawsuit agreed to engage in non-binding mediation and on July 20, 2005, reached an agreement to settle the Lawsuit. Pursuant to this agreement, in exchange for a payment, the plaintiffs dismissed the case with prejudice and the parties executed mutual general releases. The Company’s primary directors and officers liability insurance carriersreparties to the Lawsuit subsequently began the document discovery process and responded to interrogatories. funded the full cost of the settlement.

The Company incurred approximately $200,000 in defense costs in 2002. No additional costs have been incurred in 2005, 2004 and 2003. The Company’s primary directors and officers liability insurance carriersreparties to the Lawsuit subsequently began the document discovery process and responded to interrogatories. funded the additional costs of defending this Lawsuit.

Various ~~other~~ legal proceedings are pending against the Company. The Company considers all such ~~other~~ proceedings to be ordinary litigation incident to the character of its businesses. Certain claims are covered by liability insurance. The Company believes that the resolution of those claims, to the extent not covered by insurance, will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

Change of control agreements

The Company is a party to change of control agreements, which provide for payments to certain directors under certain circumstances following a change of control. Since the change of control agreements require large cash payments to be made by any person effecting a change of control, these agreements may discourage takeover attempts. The change of control agreements provide that, if the services of any person party to a change of control agreement are terminated within three years following a change of control, that individual will be entitled to receive, in a lump sum within 10 days of the termination date, a payment equal to 2.99 times that individual’s average annual compensation for the shorter of the five years preceding the change of control and the period the individual received compensation from us for personal services. Assuming a change of control was to occur at the present time, payments of approximately $449,000 each would be made to the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors. If any such payment, either alone or together with others made in connection with the individual’s termination, is considered to be an excess parachute payment under the Internal Revenue Code, the individual will be entitled to receive an additional payment in an amount which, when added to the initial payment, would result in a net benefit to the individual, after giving effect to excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code and income taxes on such additional payment, equal to the initial payment before such additional payment and the Company would not be able to deduct these initial or additional payments for income tax purposes.

1110

PUBLICARD, INC.

AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~Insurance recoveries~~

During 2003, the Company entered into three binding settlements with various historical insurers that resolved certain claims (including certain future claims) under policies of insurance issued to the Company by those insurers. As a result of the settlements, after allowance for associated expenses, offsetting adjustments and amounts held in escrow, the Company received net proceeds of approximately $4.1 million in 2003. Pursuant to one of the settlements, an additional net amount of approximately $470,000 was placed in escrow to secure the payment of certain indemnification obligations. Absent any indemnity claims, amounts will be released from escrow beginning September 30, 2004 and ending June 30, 2006. During 2005 and 2004, net cash released from escrow amounted to approximately $52,000 and $50,000, respectively. The Company recognized a gain from these settlements of approximately $4.6 million in 2003.

In February 2004, the Company entered into a binding agreement to assign to a third party certain insurance claims against a group of historic insurers. In July 2004, the assignment was supplemented to include several additional insurers. The claims involve several historic general liability policies of insurance issued to the Company. As a result of the assignment, after allowance for associated expenses and offsetting adjustments, the Company received net proceeds of approximately $647,000 in 2004. The Company recognized a gain from this assignment of $477,000 in the first quarter of 2004 and $170,000 in the third quarter of 2004.

The Company is also in discussions with other insurance markets regarding the status of certain policies of insurance. It cannot be determined whether any additional amounts may be recovered from these other insurers nor can the timing of any such additional recoveries be determined.

~~Leases~~

The Company leases certain office space, vehicles and office equipment under operating leases that expire over the next four years. Minimum payments for operating leases having initial or remaining non-cancelable terms in excess of one year aggregates approximately $573,000.

Note 5-4- COMPREHENSIVE ~~LOSS~~INCOME (LOSS)

Comprehensive ~~loss~~income (loss) for the Company includes foreign currency translation adjustments, as well as the net ~~loss~~income (loss) reported in the Company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. Comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2005~~2006 and ~~2004~~2005 was as follows (in thousands):

Three months ended
September 30,

Nine months ended
September 30,

2005

2004

2005

2004

Net loss $ (312 ) $ (3,082 ) $ (1,484 ) $ (4,368 )
Pension termination - 2,649 - 2,649
Foreign currency translation adjustments 9 (2 ) 36 (4 )
Comprehensive loss $ (303 ) $ (435 ) $ (1,448 ) $ (1,723 )

	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2006			2005			2006			2005

Net income (loss)	$	7,081		$	(312	)	$	6,198		$	(1,484	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments		(57	)		9			(90	)		36
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	7,024		$	(303	)	$	6,108		$	(1,448	)

Note ~~6 - PREFERRED STOCK CONVERSION~~5- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

InOn October 13, 2006, the ~~third quarter of 2005, 100~~Company entered into the Assignment Agreement with Sallyport, pursuant to which the Company assigned 60,058 shares of ~~Class~~Series A Preferred Stock ~~were converted into 250,000~~of Tecsec to Sallyport in exchange for $150,000. In addition, pursuant to the Assignment Agreement, Sallyport agreed to use its best efforts to transfer to the Company or cause to be issued to the Company shares of ~~PubliCARD~~ common ~~stock.~~stock of Tecsec representing 2 ½% of Tecsec’s common stock, calculated on a fully-diluted basis and giving effect to shares that may be issued as a result of Sallyport’s financing of Tecsec during the current year. On October 13, 2006, Tecsec confirmed its agreement to issue such shares to the Company.

On October 23, 2006, the Company received an interim distribution of $105,000 from the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (“ADEQ”) for reimbursement of expenses incurred for the remediation of the Masterview Window Property in Phoenix, Arizona. The Company has requested a hearing with the ADEQ to seek its approval to disburse payment for the remainder of the $370,000 in total expense it incurred as part of the remediation. The Company cannot determine at this time whether any future reimbursements will be made by the ADEQ.

1211

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other sections of this Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements, including (without limitation) statements concerning possible or assumed future results of operations of PubliCARD preceded by, followed by or that include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “may,” “should,” “would,” “could,” “intends,” “plans” or similar expressions. For those statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking statements contained in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. You should understand that the possible consequences of such statements made under ~~“Factors That May Affect Future Results”~~the caption “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this document could affect our future results and could cause those results to differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements.

Overview

PubliCARD was incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 1913. PubliCARD entered the smart card industry in early 1998, and began to develop solutions for the conditional access, security, payment system and data storage needs of industries utilizing smart card technology. In 1998 and 1999, the Company made a series of acquisitions to enhance its position in the smart card industry. In March 2000, PubliCARD’s Board, together with its management team, determined to integrate its operations and focus on deploying smart card solutions, which facilitate secure access and transactions. To effect this new business strategy, in March 2000, the Board adopted a plan of disposition pursuant to which the Company divested its non-core operations.

In July 2001, after evaluating the timing of potential future revenues, PubliCARD’s Board decided to shift the Company’s strategic focus. While the Board remained confident in the long-term prospects of the smart card business, the timing of public sector and corporate initiatives in wide-scale, broadband environments utilizing the Company’s smart card reader and chip products had become more uncertain. Given the lengthened time horizon, the Board did not believe it would be prudent to continue to invest the Company’s current resources in the ongoing development and marketing of these technologies. Accordingly, the Board determined that shareholders' interests will be best served by pursuing strategic alliances with one or more companies that have the resources to capitalize more fully on the Company's smart card reader and chip-related technologies. In connection with this shift in the Company’s strategic focus, workforce reductions and other measures were implemented to achieve cost savings.

~~At present,~~ PubliCARD’s sole operating activities are conducted through its wholly-owned Infineer ~~subsidiary, which~~Ltd. subsidiary. Infineer designs smart card solutions for educational and corporate sites. ~~The~~

Infineer has continued to incur operating losses and negative cash flow. During 2003, 2004 and 2005, the Company contributed additional capital to Infineer of $70,000, $225,000 and $150,000, respectively. It is likely that Infineer will require additional capital and the Company does not have the financial resources to provide such support. Given the Company’s ~~future plans revolve around a potential acquisition strategy that would focus on businesses in areas outside~~lack of available resources, continued operating losses and debt position, the ~~high technology sector while continuing~~Company has begun to ~~support~~consider various alternatives. In 2006, with the ~~expansion~~assistance of an investment banker, the Company commenced an assessment of the value of Infineer, developed an information memorandum and obtained offers for Infineer’s potential for sale. This process concluded without a viable offer for the business. ~~However,~~The Board of Directors has not decided whether to continue with the disposition effort. It is therefore uncertain whether an acceptable offer will materialize or whether any such sale will ultimately be consummated. Any such determination to dispose of Infineer would depend upon, among other things, the amount of potential proceeds of any such sale and require the approval of the Company’s shareholders.

Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement between the PBGC and the Company, the Company was liable to the PBGC for the unfunded guaranteed benefit payable by the PBGC to Plan participants in the amount of $7.5 million. The Company satisfied this liability by issuing the Note payable to the PBGC with a face amount of $7.5 million. Pursuant to the Security Agreement and Pledge Agreement, both dated September 23, 2004, the Note was secured by (a) all presently owned or thereafter acquired real or personal property and rights to property of the Company and (b) the common and preferred stock of Infineer and TecSec owned by the Company.

On July 27, 2006, the Company entered into the Payment Agreement with the PBGC pursuant to which the PBGC and the Company provided for the settlement and discharge of the Company’s obligations under the Settlement Agreement and the Note. Pursuant to the Payment Agreement, the Company paid the $256,391.31 on July 27, 2006, and agreed that if, between July 27, 2006 and July 27, 2011, the Company receives Net Proceeds in excess of $250,000, the Company will ~~not~~pay to the PBGC 50% of the amount of such excess. As defined in the Payment Agreement, “Net Proceeds” means the amount received by the Company in cash or marketable securities, less the amount of reasonable transaction costs and expenses and debt paid, retained or assumed, from any of (i) the sale by the Company of any or all capital stock of Infineer; (ii) the sale by Infineer of all or substantially all of its assets and a distribution of the proceeds of such sale to the Company; (iii) the sale by the Company of any or all capital stock of Tecsec; and (iv) proceeds received by the Company from settlements, buyouts or assignments of claims with respect to insurance policies covering environmental liabilities for which claims were made prior to July 27, 2006. The Payment Agreement further provides that if, on July 27, 2011, the Company exists as a going concern and holds capital stock of Infineer (and Infineer exists as a going concern) or Tecsec (and Tecsec exists as a going concern), the Company will be ~~able~~deemed to ~~implement~~have sold such ~~plans unless it is successful in obtaining~~capital stock for its fair market value, which shall be added to Net Proceeds for purposes of determining the amount of additional ~~funding, as~~payments to the PBGC, if any.

On October 13, 2006, the Company entered into the Assignment Agreement with Sallyport, pursuant to which ~~no assurance can~~the Company assigned 60,058 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Tecsec to Sallyport in exchange for $150,000. In addition, pursuant to the Assignment Agreement, Sallyport agreed to use its best efforts to transfer to the Company or cause to be ~~given.~~issued to the Company shares of common stock of Tecsec representing 2 ½% of Tecsec’s common stock, calculated on a fully-diluted basis and giving effect to shares that may be issued as a result of Sallyport’s financing of Tecsec during the current year. On October 13, 2006, Tecsec confirmed its agreement to issue such shares to the Company. Given the Company’s current financial position, it does not believe that any additional payments will be due to the PBGC on July 27, 2011.

On July 27, 2006, the Company entered into the Payment Agreement with the PBGC, which provides that if, between July 27, 2006 and July 27, 2011, the Company receives Net Proceeds in excess of $250,000, the Company will pay to the PBGC 50% of the amount of such excess. See “ -- Liquidity” below. Based on proceeds from the Tecsec Assignment Agreement and estimated future insurance recoveries, the Company expects that the Company will receive Net Proceeds in excess of $250,000. Accordingly, the Company expects to pay to the PBGC 50% of the proceeds received in connection with the Assignment Agreement.

~~PubliCARD’s consolidated~~The Company has not recorded any value on its financial statements ~~contemplate~~for the ~~realization~~equity received in connection with the Assignment Agreement. In accordance with SFAS No. 15, Troubled Debt Restructurings, the Company has reduced the carrying value of ~~assets~~its liability to the PBGC to an amount equal to its estimated future cash payments, which has resulted in a gain of $7.2 million, or $0.29 per common share, from the settlement with the PBGC. The Company has pledged 1.25% of the equity received from Assignment and Assumption Agreement with Sallyport Capital Holdings to the ~~satisfaction~~PBGC. The Company has not recorded any value on its financial statements for this equity. In accordance with SFAS No. 15, Troubled Debt Restructurings, the Company has reduced the carrying value of ~~liabilities~~its liability to the PBGC to an amount equal to its estimated future cash payments, which has resulted in a gain of $7.2 million, or $0.29 per common share from the ~~normal course of business.~~ settlement with the PBGC.

~~The Company’s defined benefit pension plan was frozen in 1993. In January 2003,~~Management believes that existing cash and short-term investments will not be sufficient to permit the Company ~~filed~~to continue operating past the first quarter of 2007 and the Company will likely cease operations. If a ~~notice with~~sale of Infineer is consummated, the ~~PBGC seeking a “distress termination”~~Company will not thereafter have any ongoing business operations. In either case, the Company does not expect that any funds will be available for distribution to its shareholders.

The consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q contemplate the realization of assets and the ~~Plan. In September 2004,~~satisfaction of liabilities in the PBGC proceeded to terminate the Plan and was appointed as the Plan’s trustee. See Note 3 to the Unaudited Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the Plan termination.normal course of business. As a result of the Plan termination, the Company’s 2003 and 2004 funding requirements due to the Plan amounting to $3.4 million through September 15, 2004 were eliminated. As such, management believes that existing cash and short term investments may be sufficient to meet the Company’s operating and capital requirements at the currently anticipated levels through March 31, 2006. However, additional capital will be necessary in order to operate beyond March 31, 2006 and to fund the current business plan and other obligations. While the Companyfactors described above, it is ~~considering various funding alternatives, the Company has not secured or entered into any arrangements to obtain additional funds. There can be no assurance~~unlikely that the Company will be able to obtain additional funding on acceptable terms or at all. If the Company cannot raise additional capital to continue its present level of operations it is not likely to be able to meet its obligations, take advantage of future acquisition opportunities or further develop or enhance its product offering, any of which would have a material adverse effect on its business and results of operations and is likely to lead the Company to seek bankruptcy protection. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The independent auditors’ reports on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002 contain emphasis paragraphs concerning substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Results of Operations

The following table is derived from the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and sets forth the Company’s consolidated results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 ~~and 2004 (in~~(dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						September 30,						September 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004			2006			2005			2006			2005

Revenues	$	1,029		$	1,260		$	2,689		$	3,116		$	887		$	1,029		$	2,434		$	2,689
Cost of revenues		428			530			1,220			1,416			412			429			1,143			1,220
Gross margin		601			730			1,469			1,700			475			600			1,291			1,469
Gross margin percentage		58	%		58	%		55	%		55	%		54	%		58	%		53	%		55	%
Operating expenses:
General and administrative		515			568			1,537			1,840			387			514			1,296			1,537
Sales and marketing		247			365			929			1,190			249			248			769			929
Product development		150			173			489			522			156			149			441			489
Amortization of intangibles		-			10			-			30
		912			1,116			2,955			3,582			792			911			2,506			2,955
Loss from operations		(311	)		(386	)		(1,486	)		(1,882	)		(317	)		(311	)		(1,215	)		(1,486	)
Other income (expenses):
Interest income		7			6			21			18			5			7			13			21
Interest expense		(8	)		(6	)		(19	)		(16	)		(9	)		(8	)		(25	)		(19	)
Cost of pensions - non-operating		-			(132	)		-			(396	)
Loss on pension settlement		-			(2,739	)		-			(2,739	)
Gain on insurance recoveries		-			170			-			647
Other income (expenses), net		-			5			-			-
Other income														182			-			205			-
		(1	)		(2,696	)		2			(2,486	)		178			(1	)		193			2
Net loss	$	(312	)	$	(3,082	)	$	(1,484	)	$	(4,386	)
Net loss from continuing operations													$	(139	)	$	(312	)	$	(1,022	)	$	(1,484	)

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2005~~2006 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2004~~2005

Revenues. Revenues are generated from product sales, technology and software license fees, installation and maintenance contracts. Consolidated revenues decreased to ~~$1.0~~$887,000 in 2006 compared to $1.03 million in ~~2005 compared to $1.3 million for 2004.~~2005. Foreign currency changes had the effect of ~~decreasing~~increasing revenues by 1%2%. Excluding the impact of foreign currency changes, sales in ~~2005~~2006 decreased by 17% driven by a ~~$77,000~~$146,000 decline in direct sales to customers located in the United Kingdom ~~as well as~~offset by a ~~$154,000 decline~~$3,000 increase in shipments to distribution partners located outside of the United ~~Kingdom. In~~Kingdom (other than the ~~first several months of 2005, Infineer reduced sales and customer support headcount by a total of eight people to reduce operating expenses and reflect lower revenue expectations.~~U.S.).

1413

Gross margin. Cost of revenues consists primarily of material, personnel costs and overhead. Gross margin, as a percentage of net revenues, was 54% in 2006 compared to 58% in ~~both 2005 and 2004.~~2005. The decrease is primarily a result of a shift in the Company’s sales mix which provided a greater proportion of sales to customers located outside the United Kingdom. Sales to these distribution partners are generally at a lower margin than sales to customers located within the United Kingdom.

Sales and marketing expenses. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of personnel and travel costs, public relations, trade shows and marketing materials. Sales and marketing expenses were ~~$247,000~~$249,000 in ~~2005~~2006 compared to ~~$365,000~~$248,000 in ~~2004. The decrease in expenses is mainly attributable to a $111,000 decline in wages, benefits~~2005. Headcount levels within the sales and ~~employee business expense associated with headcount reductions.~~marketing departments were consistent between 2006 and 2005.

Product development expenses. Product development expenses include costs associated with the development of new products and enhancements to existing products. Product development expenses consist primarily of personnel and travel costs and contract engineering services. Product development expenses amounted to ~~$150,000~~$156,000 in ~~2005~~2006 compared to ~~$173,000~~$149,000 in ~~2004. The decrease in expenses is mainly attributable~~2005. Headcount levels related to ~~a $21,000 decline in wages, benefits~~product development were consistent between 2006 and ~~employee business expense associated with headcount reductions.~~2005.

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel and related costs for general corporate ~~functions,~~activities, including finance and accounting, ~~human resources,~~ risk management and legal. General and administrative expenses were ~~$515,000~~$387,000 in ~~2005~~2006 compared to ~~$568,000~~$514,000 in ~~2004.~~2005. The decrease in expenses is mainly attributable to a ~~$113,000 decline in corporate wages and benefits offset by a $65,000 increase~~$43,000 reduction in directors fees, reduced outside services expense of $12,000, reduced employee salaries and business related expenses of $111,000 and lower legal and insurance expenses of $12,000 at corporate, offset by $30,000 ~~increase in consulting fees.~~

~~Amortization~~ of ~~intangibles.~~ ~~In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill~~additional consultant expenses and Other Intangible Assets”, effective January 1, 2002, goodwill is no longer amortized. Goodwill and other intangibles will be subject to an annual review for impairment or earlier if circumstances or events indicate that impairment has occurred. This may result in future write-downs or the write-offstock based compensation expenses of ~~such assets. Amortization of intangibles of $10,000 in 2004 related to the continuing amortization of definite life intangibles, which have been fully amortized as of December 31, 2004.~~$23,000.

Other Income and Expenses. Other Income and Expenses consist primarily of interest income and ~~expense.~~ ~~Cost~~expenses, insurance settlement proceeds, and other restructuring benefits and expenses. The increase in other income was primarily the result of ~~pensions~~receipt of $72,000 in ~~2004 of $132,000 principally represents pension expense associated~~connection with ~~the Company’s frozen defined benefit pension plan. Effective September 30, 2004, the PBGC proceeded to terminate the Plan and was appointed~~unclaimed property as the Plan’s trustee. A loss on the termination of the Plan of $2.7 million was recorded in the third quarter of 2004. See Note 3 to Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion. As a result of ~~the termination~~a demutualization proceeding and $111,000 of ~~the Plan, net periodic pension cost will be zero prospectively.~~

In February 2004, the Company entered into a binding agreement to assign to a third party certain insurance claims against a group of historic insurers. In July 2004, the assignment was supplemented to include several additional insurers. The claims involve several historic general liability policies of insurance issued to the Company. As a result of the assignment, after allowance for associated expenses and offsetting adjustments, the Company received net proceeds received from the Department of ~~approximately $477,000~~Energy in ~~May 2004 and an additional $170,000 in October 2004. The Company recognized~~connection with a ~~gain of $477,000 in the first quarter of 2004 and an additional gain of $170,000 in the third quarter of 2004.~~crude oil overcharge refund.

Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2005~~2006 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2004~~2005

Revenues. Consolidated revenues decreased to $2.4 million in 2006 compared to $2.7 million ~~in 2005 compared to $3.1 million~~ for ~~2004.~~2005. Foreign currency changes had the effect of increasing revenues by 1%7%. Excluding the impact of foreign currency changes, sales in ~~2005~~2006 decreased by ~~15%~~10% driven by a decline of ~~$211,000~~$303,000 in direct sales to customers located in the United Kingdom as well as a ~~$216,000~~$11,000 decline in shipments to distribution partners located outside of the United Kingdom.

Cost of revenues. Gross margin, as a percentage of net ~~sales,~~revenues, was 53% in 2006 compared to 55% in ~~both 2005 and 2004.~~2005. The decrease is primarily a result of a shift in the Company’s sales mix which provided a greater proportion of sales to customers located outside the United Kingdom. Sales to these distribution partners are generally at a lower margin than sales to customers located within the United Kingdom.

Sales and marketing expenses. Sales and marketing expenses were $769,000 in 2006 compared to $929,000 in ~~2005 compared to $1.2 million in 2004.~~2005. The decrease is primarily attributable to a ~~$255,000~~$163,000 reduction in wages, benefits and employee business expense resulting from headcount reductions. ~~Also, the 2004 expenses reflect a reimbursement of $47,000 of marketing costs under a grant with a government agency in Northern Ireland.~~

Product development expenses. Product development expenses amounted to $441,000 in 2006 compared to $489,000 in ~~2005 compared to $522,000 in 2004.~~2005. The decrease in expenses is mainly attributable to a ~~$24,000~~$32,000 decline in wages, benefits and employee business expense associated with headcount ~~reductions.~~reductions, and an $8,000 decrease in depreciation.

General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2005~~2006 decreased to $1.3 million from $1.5 million ~~from $1.8 million~~ for ~~2004.~~2005. The decrease in expenses is mainly attributable to ~~a decline of $321,000 in corporate wages and benefits and $86,000 in corporate~~lower outside services ~~(including~~(primarily legal, insurance ~~legal, accounting~~and shareholder reporting) of $96,000 at corporate, a $51,000 reduction in directors fees, reduced employee salaries and expenses of $111,000 and lower salary, professional fees, depreciation and other ~~professional fees)~~expenses of $80,000 at Infineer, offset by ~~a $172,000 increase in directors fees.~~

~~Amortization~~stock based compensation expense of ~~goodwill~~$23,000, higher consulting expenses at corporate of $52,000, and ~~intangibles.~~ ~~Amortization~~higher auditing and tax related services expense ~~associated with definite lived intangible assets was $30,000 in 2004.~~of $15,000.

Other Income and Expenses. Other Income and Expenses consist primarily of interest income and ~~expense.~~ ~~Cost~~expenses, insurance settlement proceeds, and other restructuring benefits and expenses. The increase in other income was primarily a result of ~~pensions~~receipt of $72,000 in ~~2004~~connection with unclaimed property as a result of ~~$396,000 principally represents pension expense associated~~a demutualization proceeding, $25,000 released from an escrow previously established in connection with ~~the Company’s frozen defined benefit pension plan. As discussed above, the 2004 results include the loss on the termination of the Plan of $2.7 million and~~ a ~~gain of $647,000 relating to the assignment to a third party of certain insurance claims~~claim against a ~~group~~historical insurer, and $111,000 of ~~historic insurers.~~net proceeds received from the Department of Energy in connection with a crude oil overcharge refund.

Liquidity

The consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q contemplate the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As a result of the factors described above, it is unlikely that the Company will be able to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The independent auditors’ reports on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002 contain emphasis paragraphs concerning substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company has financed its operations over the last several years primarily through funds received from the sale of a non-core businesses in 2000 and insurance and other recoveries in 2003, 2004 and ~~2004.~~2005. For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2005,~~2006, cash, including short-term investments, decreased by ~~$1.2 million~~$825,000 to ~~$750,000~~$247,000 as of September 30, ~~2005.~~2006.

Operating activities utilized cash of ~~$1.4 million in 2005~~$1,111,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and principally consisted of the net ~~loss~~income of ~~$1.5~~$6.2 million, an increase in operating assets and liabilities of $61,000 offset by a gain on insurance recoveries of $205,000 depreciation and amortization of ~~$63,000.~~$28,000 and a $7.2 million one time non-cash gain resulting from the settlement of the PBGC Note .

Investing activities generated cash of ~~$49,000~~$456,000 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2005~~2006 and principally consisted ~~principally~~ of insurance collections of $461,000. The Company expects to receive additional net funds of approximately $250,000 in the ~~release~~fourth quarter of ~~funds held in escrow pursuant to a 2003~~2006 from future insurance ~~settlement.~~settlements.

Financing activities ~~generated~~used cash of ~~$172,000~~$171,000 for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2005~~2006 and consisted of an increase in the overdraft facility at ~~Infineer.~~Infineer of $85,000, offset by repayment of the PBGC Note of $256,000.

The Company has experienced negative cash flow from operating activities in the past and expects to experience negative cash flow in ~~2005 and beyond. In addition to funding operating and capital requirements and corporate overhead, future uses of cash include~~ the ~~following:~~future.

Infineer has continued to incur operating losses and negative cash flow. During 2003, 2004 and 2005, the Company contributed additional capital to Infineer of $70,000, $225,000 and $150,000, respectively. It is likely that Infineer will require additional capital and the Company does not have the financial resources to provide such support. Given the Company’s lack of available resources, continued operating losses and debt position, the Company has begun to consider various alternatives. In 2006, with the assistance of an investment banker, the Company commenced an assessment of the value of Infineer, developed an information memorandum and obtained offers for Infineer’s potential for sale. This process concluded without a viable offer for the business. The Board of Directors has not decided whether to continue with the disposition effort. It is therefore uncertain whether an acceptable offer will materialize or whether any such sale will ultimately be consummated. Any such determination to dispose of Infineer would depend upon, among other things, the amount of potential proceeds of any such sale and require the approval of the Company’s shareholders.

~~The Company sponsored a defined benefit pension plan, which~~

The Company sponsored a defined benefit pension plan that was frozen in 1993. In January 2003, the Company filed a notice with the PBGC seeking a “distress termination” of the Plan. Pursuant to the Agreement for Appointment of Trustee and Termination of Plan between the PBGC and the Company, effective September 30, 2004, the PBGC proceeded to terminate the Plan and was appointed as the Plan’s trustee. As a result, the PBGC has assumed responsibility for paying the obligations to Plan participants. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement effective September 23, 2004 between the PBGC and the Company, the Company was liable to the PBGC for the unfunded guaranteed benefit payable by the PBGC to Plan participants in the amount of $7.5 million. The Company satisfied this liability by issuing the Note dated September 23, 2004 payable to the PBGC with a face amount of $7.5 million. A loss on the termination of the Plan of $2.7 million was recorded in the third quarter of 2004.

Pursuant to the Security Agreement and Pledge Agreement, both dated September 23, 2004, the Note is secured by (a) all presently owned or hereafter acquired real or personal property and rights to property of the Company and (b) the common and preferred stock of Infineer and TecSec owned by the Company. Infineer is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The Company has an approximately 5% ownership interest in TecSec, on a fully diluted basis.

The Company leases certain office space, vehicles and office equipment under operating leases that expire over the next four years. Minimum future payments for operating leases having initial or remaining non-cancelable terms in excess of one year aggregates approximately $573,000.

~~The Company will need to raise additional capital that may not be available to it.~~ As a result of the Plan termination, ~~discussed above,~~ the Company’s 2003 and 2004 funding requirements due to the Plan amounting to $3.4 million through September 15, 2004 were eliminated.

On July 27, 2006, the Company entered into the Payment Agreement with the PBGC pursuant to which the PBGC and the Company provided for the settlement and discharge of the Company’s obligations under the Settlement Agreement and the Note. Pursuant to the Payment Agreement, the Company paid the $256,391.31 on July 27, 2006, and agreed that if, between July 27, 2006 and July 27, 2011, the Company receives Net Proceeds in excess of $250,000, the Company will pay to the PBGC 50% of the amount of such excess. As defined in the Payment Agreement, “Net Proceeds” means the amount received by the Company in cash or marketable securities, less the amount of reasonable transaction costs and expenses and debt paid, retained or assumed, from any of (i) the sale by the Company of any or all capital stock of Infineer; (ii) the sale by Infineer of all or substantially all of its assets and a distribution of the proceeds of such ~~management~~sale to the Company; (iii) the sale by the Company of any or all capital stock of Tecsec; and (iv) proceeds received by the Company from settlements, buyouts or assignments of claims with respect to insurance policies covering environmental liabilities for which claims were made prior to July 27, 2006. The Payment Agreement further provides that if, on July 27, 2011, the Company exists as a going concern and holds capital stock of Infineer (and Infineer exists as a going concern) or Tecsec (and Tecsec exists as a going concern), the Company will be deemed to have sold such capital stock for its fair market value, which shall be added to Net Proceeds for purposes of determining the amount of additional payments to the PBGC, if any.

On October 13, 2006, the Company entered into the Assignment Agreement with Sallyport, pursuant to which the Company assigned 60,058 shares of Series A Preferred Stock of Tecsec to Sallyport in exchange for $150,000. In addition, pursuant to the Assignment Agreement, Sallyport agreed to use its best efforts to transfer to the Company or cause to be issued to the Company shares of common stock of Tecsec representing 2 ½% of Tecsec’s common stock, calculated on a fully-diluted basis and giving effect to shares that may be issued as a result of Sallyport’s financing of Tecsec during the current year. On October 13, 2006, Tecsec confirmed its agreement to issue such shares to the Company. Given the Company’s current financial position, it does not believe that any additional payments will be due to the PBGC on July 27, 2011. See Note 5.

Based on proceeds from the Tecsec Assignment Agreement and estimated future insurance recoveries, the Company expects that it will receive Net Proceeds in excess of $250,000. Accordingly, the Company expects to pay to the PBGC 50% of the proceeds received in connection with the Assignment Agreement.

The Company has not recorded any value on its financial statements for the equity received in connection with the Assignment Agreement. In accordance with SFAS No. 15, Troubled Debt Restructurings, the Company has reduced the carrying value of its liability to the PBGC to an amount equal to its estimated future cash payments, which has resulted in a gain of $7.2 million, or $0.29 per common share, from the settlement with the PBGC.

The Company has incurred operating losses, a substantial decline in working capital and negative cash flow from operations for a number of years. The Company has also experienced a substantial reduction in its cash and short term investments, which declined from $17.0 million at December 31, 2000 to $247,000 at September 30, 2006. The Company also had a shareholders’ deficiency of $1,020,000 as of September 30, 2006.

Management believes that existing cash and ~~short term~~short-term investments ~~may~~will not be sufficient to meet the Company’s operating and capital requirements at the currently anticipated levels through March 31, 2006. However, additional capital will be necessary in order to operate beyond March 31, 2006 and to fund the current business plan and other obligations. Whilepermit the Company ~~is considering various funding alternatives,~~to continue operating past the ~~Company has not secured or entered into any arrangements to obtain additional funds. There can be no assurance that~~first quarter of 2007 and the Company will ~~be able to obtain additional funding on acceptable terms or at all.~~likely cease operations. If a sale of Infineer is consummated, the Company ~~cannot raise additional capital to continue its present level of operations it is~~will not ~~likely to be able to meet its obligations, take advantage of future acquisition opportunities or further develop or enhance its product offering,~~thereafter have any ~~of which would have a material adverse effect on its~~ongoing business ~~and results of~~ operations.

The Company currently has no capacity for commercial debt financing. Should such capacity become available it may be adversely affected in the future by factors such as higher interest rates, inability to borrow without collateral, and continued operating losses. Borrowings may also involve covenants limiting or restricting its operations or future opportunities.

~~As a result of a failure to meet certain continuing listing requirements of the Nasdaq National Market,~~ In either case, the Company ~~transferred the listing of its common stock to the Nasdaq SmallCap Market effective May 2, 2002. On March 19, 2003, the Company received a Nasdaq Staff Determination letter indicating~~does not expect that the Company failed to comply with the minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market and that the Company’s common stock was therefore subject to delisting. The Board of the Company decided not to appeal the delisting determination. Effective March 28, 2003, the Company’s common stock no longer traded on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market. On March 28, 2003 the Company’s common stock began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board. As a result of the delisting, the liquidity of the common stock may be adversely affected. This could impair the Company’s ability to raise capital in the future. If additional capital is raised through the issuance of equity securities, the Company’s stockholders’ percentage ownership of the common stockany funds will be ~~reduced and stockholders may experience dilution in net book value per share, or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior~~available for distribution to ~~those of~~ its ~~common stockholders.~~

If the Company’s liquidity does not improve, it may be unable to continue as a going concern and is likely to seek bankruptcy protection. Such an event may result in the Company’s common and preferred stock being negatively affected or becoming worthless. The auditors’ reports on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 contained emphasis paragraphs concerning substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.shareholders.

Contractual Obligations

The following is a summary of the Company’s commitments as of September 30, ~~2005~~2006 (in thousands):

	Payments Due by Period										Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligation Years											Total		Less than 1 year		1 to 3 years		3 to 5 years		More than 5 years
Operating lease obligations											$	326	$	164	$	162	$	0	$	-
	Total		Less than 1 year		1 to3 years		3 to 5 years		More than 5 years
Operating lease obligations	$	573	$	161	$	382	$	30	$	-
Other long-term liabilities:
Note payable to PBGC(a)		7,501		-		-		-		7,501		25		25		-		-		-
Other long-term obligations		209		-		116		40		53
Other long-term liabilities												219		6		58		58		97
Total	$	8,283	$	161	$	498	$	70	$	7,554	$	570	$	195	$	220	$	58	$	97

(a)

The Note payable to the PBGC was settled on July 27, 2006. See Note 1 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s significant accounting policies are more fully described in the Notes to the Company’s Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2004.~~2005. Certain accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. The Company considers certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition and estimates of reserves for receivables and inventories ~~and valuation of goodwill~~ to be critical policies due to the estimation processes involved.

Revenue recognition and accounts receivable. Revenue from product sales and technology and software license fees is recorded upon shipment if a signed contract exists, the fee is fixed and determinable, the collection of the resulting receivable is probable and the Company has no obligation to install the product or solution. If the Company is responsible for installation, revenue from product sales and license fees is deferred and recognized upon client acceptance or “go live” date. Maintenance and support fees are deferred and recognized as revenue ratably over the contract period. Provisions are recorded for estimated warranty repairs and returns at the time the products are shipped. In the event changes in conditions cause management to determine that revenue recognition criteria are not met for certain future transactions, revenue recognized for any reporting period could be adversely affected.

Inventories. Inventories are stated at lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. The Company periodically evaluates the need to record adjustments for impairment of inventory. Inventory in excess of the Company’s estimated usage requirements is written down to its estimated net realizable value. Inherent in the estimates of net realizable value are management’s estimates related to the Company’s production schedules, customer demand, possible alternative uses and the ultimate realization of potentially excess inventory. A decrease in future demand for current products could result in an increase in the amount of excess inventories on hand.

1816

~~Impairment~~Income Taxes. The Company follows SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS No. 109”). Under the asset and liability method of ~~goodwill.~~ ~~Effective January 1, 2002,~~SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Since the Company ~~adopted SFAS No. 142. In accordance with~~has no history of continuing profits, it is unlikely that the ~~guidelines~~future benefit of ~~this statement, goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets are no longer amortized but~~these losses will be ~~assessed for impairment~~recognized. Thus, a full valuation allowance has been recorded. As of December 31, 2005, approximately $61.7 million of U.S. tax loss carryforwards (subject to review by the Internal Revenue Service), expiring from 2006 through 2025, were available to offset future taxable income. Therefore, the Company did not record any tax provision on ~~at least an annual basis. SFAS No. 142 also requires that intangible assets with estimable useful lives be amortized over their respective estimated useful lives~~its income generated during the three and reviewed for impairment. The Company determines the fair value of its sole reporting unit primarily using two approaches: a market approach technique and a discounted cash flow valuation technique. The market approach relies primarily on the implied fair value using a multiple of revenues for several entities with comparable operations and economic characteristics. Significant assumptions used in the discounted cash flow valuation include estimates of future cash flows, future short-term and long-term growth rates and estimated cost of capital for purposes of arriving at a discount factor.nine months ended September 30, 2006.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. ~~123R (revised 2004)~~123(R), “Share-Based Payment”. This statement requires compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions to be recognized in financial statements. Generally, compensation cost will be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards will be remeasured each reporting period. Compensation cost ~~will be~~is recognized over the requisite service period, generally as the award vests. The Company ~~will adopt~~adopted SFAS No. ~~123R~~123(R) in the first quarter of 2006. ~~SFAS No. 123R applies to all awards granted after the effective date and to~~There were no previously-granted awards unvested as of the adoption date. The adoption of the statement ~~is not expected to have a material~~had no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

~~Factors That May Affect Future Results~~

We have a history of operating losses and negative cash flow, we have ongoing funding obligations and we need to raise additional capital that may not be available to us, all of which could lead us to seek bankruptcy protection. ~~We have incurred losses and experienced negative cash flow from operating activities~~contemplate any voluntary changes in the past, and we expect to incur losses and experience negative cash flow from operating activities in the foreseeable future. We incurred losses from continuing operations in 2002, 2003, 2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2005 of approximately $8.3 million, $1.6 million, $4.9 million and $1.5 million, respectively. In addition, we experienced negative cash flow from operating activities of $5.1 million, $2.2 million, $2.3 million and $1.4 million in 2002, 2003, 2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively, and have a shareholders’ deficiency of $6.6 million as of September 30, 2005.

We sponsor a defined benefit pension plan which was frozen in 1993. In January 2003, we filed a notice with the PBGC seeking a “distress termination” of the Plan. Pursuant to the Agreement for Appointment of Trustee and Termination of Plan between the PBGC and us effective September 30, 2004, the PBGC proceeded to terminate the Plan and was appointed as the Plan’s trustee. As a result, the PBGC has assumed responsibility for paying the obligations to Plan participants. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement effective September 23, 2004 between the PBGC and us, we were liable to the PBGC for the unfunded guaranteed benefit payable by the PBGC to Plan participants in the amount of $7.5 million. We satisfied this liability by issuing the Note dated September 23, 2004 payable to the PBGC with a face amount of $7.5 million.

Pursuant to the Security Agreement and Pledge Agreement, both dated September 23, 2004, the Note is secured by (a) all of our presently owned or hereafter acquired real or personal property and rights to property and (b) the common and preferred stock of Infineer and TecSec we own. Infineer is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours. We have an approximately 5% ownership interest in TecSec, on a fully diluted basis.

The Note matures on September 23, 2011. The first payment will be equal to $1.0 million and will become due 30 days after we have received a total of $4.0 million in Net Recoveries. Thereafter, on each anniversary of the first payment, we are required to pay the PBGC an amount equal to 25% of the Net Recoveries in excess of $4.0 million (less the sum of all prior payments made in accordance with this sentence in prior years). As of September 30, 2005, Net Recoveries was approximately $3.5 million.

In the event of our default under the Settlement Agreement, the PBGC may declare the outstanding amount of the Note to be immediately due and payable, proceed with foreclosure of the liens granted in favor of the PBGC and exercise any other rights available under applicable law.

We will need to raise additional capital that may not be available to us. As a result of the Plan termination discussed above, our 2003 and 2004 funding requirements due to the Plan amounting to $3.4 million through September 15, 2004 were eliminated. As such, we believe that existing cash and short term investments may be sufficient to meet our operating and capital requirements at the currently anticipated levels through March 31, 2006. However, additional capital will be necessary in order to operate beyond March 31, 2006 and to fund the current business plan and other obligations. While we are actively considering various funding alternatives, no arrangement to obtain additional funding has been secured or entered into. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional funding, on acceptable terms or at all. If we cannot raise additional capital to continue at our present level of operations we may not be able to meet our obligations, take advantage of future acquisition opportunities or further develop or enhance our product offering, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations and could lead us to seek bankruptcy protection. The auditors’ reports on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 contained emphasis paragraphs concerning substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

We currently have no capacity for commercial debt financing. Should such capacity become available to us, we may be adversely affected in the future by factors such as higher interest rates, inability to borrow without collateral, and continued operating losses. Borrowings may also involve covenants limiting or restricting our operations or future opportunities. In addition, we have future non-cancelable operating lease obligations for office space, vehicles and office equipment aggregating $573,000.accounting principles.

~~We cannot assure you that Infineer will be able to continue to operate.~~ During 2002, 2003, 2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2005, PubliCARD contributed additional capital to Infineer of $44,000, $70,000, $225,000 and $150,000, respectively. Without such contributions, Infineer may not have been able to fund its operations. We cannot assure you that additional capital contributions will not be required in the future, or, if required, that PubliCARD will be in a position to make any additional capital contributions.

~~We face risks associated with acquisitions.~~ An important element of our strategic plan involves the acquisition of businesses in areas outside the technology sectors in which we have recently been engaged, so as to diversify our asset base. However, we will only be able to engage in future acquisitions if we are successful in obtaining additional funding, as to which no assurance can be given. Acquisitions would require us to invest financial resources and may have a dilutive effect on our earnings or book value per share of common stock. We cannot assure you that we will consummate any acquisitions in the future, that any financing required for such acquisitions will be available on acceptable terms or at all, or that any past or future acquisitions will not materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

~~Our acquisition strategy generally presents a number of significant risks and uncertainties, including the risks that:~~

~~we will not be able to retain the employees or business relationships of the acquired company;~~

~~we will fail to realize any synergies or other cost reduction objectives expected from the acquisition;~~

~~we will not be able to integrate the operations, products, personnel and facilities of acquired companies;~~

management’s attention will be diverted to pursuing acquisition opportunities and integrating acquired products, technologies or companies and will be distracted from performing its regular responsibilities;

~~we will incur or assume liabilities, including liabilities that are unknown or not fully known to us at the time of the acquisition; and~~

~~we will enter markets in which we have no direct prior experience.~~

~~We cannot assure you that any of the foregoing will not materialize, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.~~

~~The market’s acceptance of our products is uncertain.~~ Demand for, and market acceptance of, our software solutions and products are subject to a high level of uncertainty due to rapidly changing technology, new product introductions and changes in customer requirements and preferences. The success of our products or any future products depends upon our ability to enhance our existing products and to develop and introduce new products and technologies to meet customer requirements. We face the risk that our current and future products will not achieve market acceptance.

Our future revenues and earnings depend in large part on the success of these products, and if the benefits are not perceived sufficient or if alternative technologies are more widely accepted, the demand for our solutions may not grow and our business and operating results would be materially and adversely affected.

~~We depend on a relatively small number of customers for a majority of our revenues.~~ We rely on a limited number of customers in our business. We expect to continue to depend upon a relatively small number of customers for a majority of the revenues in our business. For the year ended December 31, 2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2005, no one customer accounted for more than 10% of our revenues. In addition, no one customer accounted for more than 10% of the accounts receivable balance as of September 30, 2005.

We generally do not enter into long-term supply commitments with our customers. Instead, we bid on a project basis. Significant reductions in sales to any of our largest customers would have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, we generate significant accounts receivable and inventory balances in connection with providing products to our customers. A customer’s inability to pay for our products could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

~~Our future success depends on our ability to keep pace with technological changes and introduce new products in a timely manner.~~ The rate of technological change currently affecting the smart card market is particularly rapid compared to other industries. Our ability to anticipate these trends and adapt to new technologies is critical to our success. Because new product development commitments must be made well in advance of actual sales, new product decisions must anticipate future demand as well as the speed and direction of technological change. Our ability to remain competitive will depend upon our ability to develop in a timely and cost effective manner new and enhanced products at competitive prices. New product introductions or enhancements by our competitors could cause a decline in sales or loss of market acceptance of our existing products and lower profit margins.

~~Our success in developing, introducing and selling new and enhanced products depends upon a variety of factors, including:~~

~~product selections;~~

~~timely and efficient completion of product design and development;~~

~~timely and efficient implementation of manufacturing processes;~~

~~effective sales, service and marketing;~~

~~price; and~~

~~product performance in the field.~~

Our ability to develop new products also depends upon the success of our research and development efforts. We may need to devote additional resources to our research and development efforts in the future. We cannot assure you that funds will be available for these expenditures or that these funds will lead to the development of viable products.

~~The highly competitive markets in which we operate could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.~~ The markets in which we operate are intensely competitive and characterized by rapidly changing technology. We compete against numerous companies, many of which have greater resources than we do, and we believe that competition is likely to intensify.

~~We believe that the principal competitive factors affecting us are:~~

~~the extent to which products support industry standards and are capable of being operated or integrated with other products;~~

~~technical features and level of security;~~

~~strength of distribution channels;~~

~~price;~~

~~product reputation, reliability, quality, performance and customer support;~~

~~product features such as adaptability, functionality and ease of use; and~~

~~competitor reputation, positioning and resources.~~

We cannot assure you that competitive pressures will not have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. Many of our current and potential competitors have longer operating histories and significantly greater financial, technical, sales, customer support, marketing and other resources, as well as greater name recognition and a larger installed base of their products and technologies than our company. Additionally, there can be no assurance that new competitors will not enter our markets. Increased competition would likely result in price reductions, reduced margins and loss of market share, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Our primary competition currently comes from companies offering closed environment solutions, including small value electronic cash systems and database management solutions, such as Moneybox (Girovend), Counter Solutions, Uniware, Cunninghams, Plastic Card Services, MARS, Diebold and Schlumberger.

Many of our current and potential competitors have broader customer relationships that could be leveraged, including relationships with many of our customers. These companies also have more established customer support and professional services organizations than we do. In addition, a number of companies with significantly greater resources than we have could attempt to increase their presence by acquiring or forming strategic alliances with our competitors, resulting in increased competition.

~~Our long product sales cycles subject us to risk.~~ Our products fall into two categories; those that are standardized and ready to install and use and those that require significant development efforts to implement within the purchasers’ own systems. Those products requiring significant development efforts tend to be newly developed technologies~~and software applications~~that can represent major investments for customers. We are subject to potential customers’ internal review processes and systems requirements. The implementation of some of our products involves deliveries of small quantities for pilot programs and significant testing by the customers before firm orders are received, or lengthy beta testing of software solutions. For these more complex products, the sales process may take one year or longer, during which time we may expend significant financial, technical and management resources, without any certainty of a sale.

~~We may be limited in our use of our federal net operating loss carryforwards.~~~~As of December 31, 2004, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards, subject to review by the Internal Revenue Service, totaling approximately~~$67.6 million for federal income tax purposes. The federal net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2005. We do not expect to earn any significant taxable income in the next several years, and may not do so until much later, if ever. A federal net operating loss can generally be carried back two, three or five years and then forward fifteen or twenty years (depending on the year in which the loss was incurred), and used to offset taxable income earned by a company (and thus reduce its income tax liability).

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that when a company undergoes an “ownership change,” that company’s use of its net operating losses is limited in each subsequent year. An “ownership change” occurs when, as of any testing date, the sum of the increases in ownership of each shareholder that owns five percent or more of the value of a company’s stock as compared to that shareholder’s lowest percentage ownership during the preceding three-year period exceeds fifty percentage points. For purposes of this rule, certain shareholders who own less than five percent of a company’s stock are aggregated and treated as a single five-percent shareholder. We may issue a substantial number of shares of our stock in connection with public and private offerings, acquisitions and other transactions in the future, although no assurance can be given that any such offering, acquisition or other transaction will be effected. In addition, the exercise of outstanding options to purchase shares of our common stock may require us to issue additional shares of our common stock. The issuance of a significant number of shares of stock could result in an “ownership change.” If we were to experience such an “ownership change,” we estimate that virtually all of our available federal net operating loss carryforwards would be effectively unavailable to reduce our taxable income.

The extent of the actual future use of our federal net operating loss carryforwards is subject to inherent uncertainty because it depends on the amount of otherwise taxable income we may earn. We cannot give any assurance that we will have sufficient taxable income in future years to use any of our federal net operating loss carryforwards before they would otherwise expire.

~~Our proprietary technology is difficult to protect and may infringe on the intellectual property rights of third parties.~~ Our success depends significantly upon our proprietary technology. We rely on a combination of copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality agreements and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. We seek to protect our software, documentation and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws, which afford only limited protection. We cannot assure you that any of our applications will be approved, that any new patents will be issued, that we will develop proprietary products or technologies that are patentable, that any issued patent will provide us with any competitive advantages or will not be challenged by third parties. Furthermore, we cannot assure you that the patents of others will not have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

If our technology or products is determined to infringe upon the rights of others, and we were unable to obtain licenses to use the technology, we could be required to cease using the technology and stop selling the products. We may not be able to obtain a license in a timely manner on acceptable terms or at all. Any of these events would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Patent disputes are common in technology related industries. We cannot assure you that we will have the financial resources to enforce or defend a patent infringement or proprietary rights action. As the number of products and competitors in the smart card market grows, the likelihood of infringement claims also increases. Any claim or litigation may be time consuming and costly, cause product shipment delays or require us to redesign our products or enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Any of these events would have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to use our proprietary information and software. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary and intellectual property rights as effectively as do the laws of the United States. Our means of protecting our proprietary and intellectual property rights may not be adequate. There is a risk that our competitors will independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products or design around patents or other intellectual property rights.

We believe that establishing, maintaining and enhancing the Infineer brand name is essential to our business. We filed an application for a United States trademark registration and an application for service mark registration of our name and logo. We are aware of third parties that use marks or names that contain similar sounding words or variations of the “infi” prefix. In July 2002, we received a claim from a third party challenging the use of the Infineer name. We reached an agreement with this third party in 2004 to amend our trademark application, and we believe that this claim has been resolved. As a result of this claim and other challenges which may occur in the future, we may incur significant expenses, pay substantial damages and be prevented from using the Infineer name. Use of a similar name by third parties may also cause confusion to our clients and confusion in the market, which could decrease the value of our brand and harm our reputation. We cannot assure you that our business would not be adversely affected if we are required to change our name or if confusion in the market did occur.

~~The nature of our products subjects us to product liability risks.~~ Our customers may rely on certain of our current products and products in development to prevent unauthorized access to digital content for financial transactions, computer networks, and real property. A malfunction of or design defect in certain of our products could result in tort or warranty claims. Although we attempt to reduce the risk of exposure from such claims through warranty disclaimers and liability limitation clauses in our sales agreements and by maintaining product liability insurance, we cannot assure you that these measures will be effective in limiting our liability for any damages. Any liability for damages resulting from security breaches could be substantial and could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results. In addition, a well-publicized actual or perceived security breach involving our conditional access or security products could adversely affect the market’s perception of our products in general, regardless of whether any breach is attributable to our products. This could result in a decline in demand for our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

~~We may have difficulty retaining or recruiting professionals for our business~~. Our future success and performance is dependent on the continued services and performance of our senior management and other key personnel. If we fail to meet our operating and financial objectives this may make it more difficult to retain and reward our senior management and key personnel. The loss of the services of any of our executive officers or other key employees could materially adversely affect our business.

Our business requires experienced software and hardware engineers, and our success depends on identifying, hiring, training and retaining such experienced, knowledgeable professionals. If a significant number of our current employees or any of our senior technical personnel resign, or for other reasons are no longer employed by us, we may be unable to complete or retain existing projects or bid for new projects of similar scope and revenues. In addition, former employees may compete with us in the future.

Even if we retain our current employees, our management must continually recruit talented professionals in order for our business to grow. Furthermore, there is significant competition for employees with the skills required to perform the services we offer. We cannot assure you that we will be able to attract a sufficient number of qualified employees in the future to sustain and grow our business, or that we will be successful in motivating and retaining the employees we are able to attract. If we cannot attract, motivate and retain qualified professionals, our business, financial condition and results of operations will suffer.

Our international operations subject us to risks associated with operating in foreign markets, including fluctuations in currency exchange rates, which could adversely affect our operations and financial condition. Our operations are located in the United Kingdom and sales to customers outside the U.S. represented approximately 88% of total sales for both the year ended December 31, 2004 and the nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively. Because we derive a substantial portion of our business outside the United States, we are subject to certain risks associated with operating in foreign markets including the following:

•~~tariffs and other trade barriers;~~

•~~difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;~~

•~~currency exchange risks;~~

•~~export controls related to encryption technology;~~

•~~unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;~~

•~~changes in economic and political conditions;~~

•~~seasonal reductions in business activities in the countries where our customers are located;~~

•~~longer payment cycles and greater difficulty in accounts receivable collection;~~

•~~potentially adverse tax consequences; and~~

•~~burdens of complying with a variety of foreign laws.~~

Any of the foregoing could adversely impact the success of our operations. We cannot assure you that such factors will not have a material adverse effect on our future sales and, consequently, on our business, operating results and financial condition. In addition, fluctuations in exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. To date, we have not engaged in currency hedging.

~~Changes we may need or be required to make in our insurance coverage may expose us to increased liabilities and may interfere with our ability to retain or attract qualified officers and directors.~~ We renew or replace various insurance policies on an annual basis, including those that cover directors and officers liability. Given the current climate of rapidly increasing insurance premiums and erosions of coverage, we may need or be required to reduce our coverage and increase our deductibles in order to afford the premiums. To the extent we reduce our coverage and increase our deductibles, our exposure and the exposure of our directors and officers for liabilities that either become excluded from coverage or underinsured will increase. As a result, we may lose or may experience difficulty in attracting qualified directors and officers.

~~We are subject to government regulation.~~Federal, state and local regulations impose various environmental controls on the discharge of chemicals and gases, which have been used in our past assembly processes and may be used in future processes. Moreover, changes in such environmental rules and regulations may require us to invest in capital equipment and implement compliance programs in the future. Any failure by us to comply with environmental rules and regulations, including the discharge of hazardous substances, could subject us to liabilities and could materially adversely affect our operations.

~~Recently enacted and proposed regulatory changes will cause us to incur increased costs.~~Recently enacted and proposed changes in the laws and regulations affecting public companies, including the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, will increase our expenses as we evaluate the implications of new rules and devote resources to respond to the new requirements. In particular, we expect to incur significant additional administrative expense as we implement Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires management to report on, and our independent registered public accounting firm to attest to, our internal controls. The compliance of these new rules could also result in continued diversion of management’s time and attention, which could prove to be disruptive to business operations. Further, we may lose or may experience difficulty in attracting qualified directors and officers.

There can be no assurance that we will timely complete the management certification and auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Possible consequences of failure to complete such actions include sanction or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission. Any such action could harm our stock price and also have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and financial position.

~~Our articles of incorporation and by-laws, certain change of control agreements, our rights plan and provisions of Pennsylvania law could deter takeover attempts.~~

~~Blank check preferred stock~~. Our board of directors has the authority to issue preferred stock and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including voting rights, of these shares without any further vote or action by the holders of our common stock. The rights of the holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future may adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common stock. The issuance of preferred stock could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock, thereby delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control. Such preferred stock may have other rights, including economic rights, senior to our common stock, and as a result, the issuance of the preferred stock could limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock and could have a material adverse effect on the market value of our common stock.

~~Rights plan~~. Our rights plan entitles the registered holders of rights to purchase shares of our class A preferred stock upon the occurrence of certain events, and may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control.

~~Change of control agreements~~. We are a party to change of control agreements, which provide for payments to certain of our directors under certain circumstances following a change of control. Since the change of control agreements require large cash payments to be made by any person effecting a change of control, these agreements may discourage takeover attempts.

The change of control agreements provide that, if the services of any person party to a change of control agreement are terminated within three years following a change of control, that individual will be entitled to receive, in a lump sum within 10 days of the termination date, a payment equal to 2.99 times that individual’s average annual compensation for the shorter of the five years preceding the change of control and the period the individual received compensation from us for personal services. Assuming a change of control were to occur at the present time, payments would be made of approximately $633,000 to each of Mr. Harry I. Freund and Mr. Jay S. Goldsmith. If any such payment, either alone or together with others made in connection with the individual’s termination, is considered to be an excess parachute payment under the Internal Revenue Code, the individual will be entitled to receive an additional payment in an amount which, when added to the initial payment, would result in a net benefit to the individual, after giving effect to excise taxes imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code and income taxes on such additional payment, equal to the initial payment before such additional payment and we would not be able to deduct these initial or additional payments for income tax purposes.

~~Pennsylvania law~~. We are a Pennsylvania corporation. Anti-takeover provisions of Pennsylvania law could make it difficult for a third party to acquire control of us, even if such change of control would be beneficial to our shareholders.

~~Our stock was delisted from the Nasdaq System.~~ On February 14, 2002, we received a notice from The Nasdaq Stock Market that our common stock had failed to maintain a minimum closing bid price of $1.00 over the last 30 consecutive trading days as required by the Nasdaq National Market rules. We received a second notice on February 27, 2002, that our common stock also failed to maintain a market value of public float of $5 million.

In accordance with the Nasdaq rules, we were required to regain compliance with the National Market minimum bid price requirement and with the market value of public float requirement by May 2002. Since our common stock continued to trade significantly below $1.00, in April 2002, we filed an application to transfer the listing of our common stock to the SmallCap Market. The application was approved and our common stock listing was transferred to the SmallCap Market effective May 2, 2002. The SmallCap Market also has a minimum bid price requirement of $1.00. We qualified for an extended grace period to comply with the SmallCap Market’s $1.00 minimum bid price requirement, which extended the delisting determination by Nasdaq until February 10, 2003.

On March 19, 2003, we received a Nasdaq Staff Determination letter indicating that we failed to comply with the minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on the SmallCap Market and that our common stock was therefore subject to delisting. Our board of directors decided not to appeal the delisting determination. Effective March 28, 2003, our common stock no longer traded on the SmallCap Market. On March 28, 2003, our common stock began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board.

As a result of the delisting, the liquidity of our common stock may be materially adversely affected. This could impair our ability to raise capital in the future. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional funding, on acceptable terms or at all. If we cannot raise additional capital to continue at our present level of operations we may not be able to meet our obligations, take advantage of future acquisition opportunities or further develop or enhance our product offering, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations and could lead us to seek bankruptcy protection.

~~Our stock price is extremely volatile.~~ The stock market has recently experienced significant price and volume fluctuations unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. The market price of our common stock has been highly volatile and is likely to continue to be volatile. The future trading price for our common stock will depend on a number of factors, including:

	•	~~delisting of our common stock from the Nasdaq SmallCap Market effective March 28, 2003 (see “Our stock has been delisted from the Nasdaq System” above);~~
	•	~~the volume of activity for our common stock is minimal and therefore a large number of shares placed for sale or purchase could increase its volatility;~~
	•	~~our ability to effectively manage our business, including our ability to raise capital;~~
	•	~~variations in our annual or quarterly financial results or those of our competitors;~~
	•	~~general economic conditions, in particular, the technology service sector;~~
	•	~~expected or announced relationships with other companies;~~
	•	~~announcements of technological advances innovations or new products by us or our competitors;~~
	•	~~patents or other proprietary rights or patent litigation; and~~
	•	~~product liability or warranty litigation.~~

~~We cannot be certain that the market price of our common stock will not experience significant fluctuations in the future, including fluctuations that are adverse and unrelated to our performance.~~

2717

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Foreign currency exchange rate risk

We conduct operations in the United Kingdom and sell products in several different countries. Therefore, our operating results may be impacted by the fluctuating exchange rates of foreign currencies, especially the British pound, in relation to the U.S. dollar. We do not currently engage in hedging activities with respect to our foreign currency exposure. We continually monitor our exposure to currency fluctuations and may use financial hedging techniques when appropriate to minimize the effect of these fluctuations. Even so, exchange rate fluctuations may still have a material adverse effect on our business and operating results.

Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk primarily through short-term investments and an overdraft facility. Our investment policy calls for investment in short-term, low risk instruments. As of September 30, ~~2005,~~2006, short-term investments ~~(principally U.S. Treasury bills)~~(a money market account) were ~~$697,000~~$229,000 and borrowing under the overdraft facility amounted to ~~$484,000.~~$564,000. Due to the nature of these investments and the amount of the overdraft facility and the Company's financial condition, any change in rates (other than a nominal change) would ~~not~~ have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that the information the Company must disclose in its filings with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis. With the participation of management, the Company's chief executive officer and ~~chief~~principal financial officer ~~has~~have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon this evaluation, the chief executive officer and ~~chief~~principal financial officer ~~has~~have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has not been any change in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting during the period to which this report relates that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

2818

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Various ~~other~~ legal proceedings are pending against the Company. The Company considers all such ~~other~~ proceedings to be ordinary litigation incident to the character of its business. Certain claims are covered by liability insurance. The Company believes that the resolution of these claims to the extent not covered by insurance will not, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations of the Company.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

~~See “Management’s Discussion~~We do not expect to continue as a going concern. We have incurred losses, a substantial decline in working capital and ~~Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”~~negative cash flow from operations for a ~~discussion~~number of years. We have also experienced a substantial reduction in our cash and short term investments, which declined from $17.0 million at December 31, 2000 to $247,000 at September 30, 2006. We also had a shareholders’ deficiency of $1,020,000 as of September 30, 2006.

Infineer has continued to incur operating losses and negative cash flow. During 2003, 2004 and 2005, we contributed additional capital to Infineer of $70,000, $225,000 and $150,000, respectively. It is likely that Infineer will require additional capital and we do not have the financial resources to provide such support. Given our lack of available resources, continued operating losses and debt position, we have begun to consider various alternatives. In 2006, with the assistance of an investment banker, we commenced an assessment of the ~~risk factors applicable~~value of Infineer, developed an information memorandum and obtained offers for Infineer’s potential for sale. This process concluded without a viable offer for the business. The Board of Directors has not decided whether to continue with the ~~Company.~~disposition effort. It is therefore uncertain whether an acceptable offer will materialize or whether any such sale will ultimately be consummated. Any such determination to dispose of Infineer would depend upon, among other things, the amount of potential proceeds of any such sale and require the approval of our shareholders.

~~ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION~~We believe that existing cash and short-term investments will not be sufficient to permit us to continue operating past the first quarter of 2007 and we will likely cease operations. If a sale of Infineer is consummated, we will not thereafter have any ongoing business operations. In either case, we do not expect that any funds will be available for distribution to its shareholders.

InAccordingly, it is unlikely that we will be able to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the ~~third quarter~~outcome of this uncertainty. The independent auditors’ reports on the our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002 contain emphasis paragraphs concerning substantial doubt about the ~~Company reported all required disclosures on Form 8-K.~~Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits

10.1	~~Settlement~~Engagement Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2006, between PubliCARD, Inc. and Joseph Sarachek. Incorporated by reference from PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2006.

10.2	Addendum to Engagement Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2006, between PubliCARD, Inc. and Joseph E. Sarachek. Incorporated by reference from PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2006.

10.3	Indemnification Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2006, between PubliCARD, Inc. and Joseph E. Sarachek. Incorporated by reference from PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2006.

10.4	Stock Option Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2006, between PubliCARD, Inc. and Joseph E. Sarachek. Incorporated by reference from PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2006.

10.5	Non-Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2006, between PubliCARD, Inc. and Joseph E. Sarachek. Incorporated by reference from PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2006.

10.6

Payment, Retirement and Release Agreement dated as of ~~August 5, 2005 among Triro Equities, Leonard M. Ross, Rossco Holdings Incorporated, Mill Equities Co., Lodgeco Properties, Ltd.~~July 27, 2006 by and ~~CHSC Ltd.~~between the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and PubliCARD, Inc.~~, Harry I. Freund, Jay Goldsmith, Jan-Erik Rottinghuis and Antonio L. DeLise.~~

~~10.2~~

~~Description of the registrant’s compensation and reimbursement practices for its directors.~~ Incorporated by reference ~~to the registrant’s~~from PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 28, 2006.

10.7	Assignment of Shares and Assumption of Obligations Agreement dated as of October 13, 2006 between Sallyport Investment Partnership and PubliCARD, Inc. Incorporated by reference from PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 27, 2006.

10.8	Letter from TECSEC, Incorporated to PubliCARD, Inc., dated ~~November 14, 2005.~~as of October 13, 2006. Incorporated by reference to PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 27, 2006.

31(i).1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer ~~and Chief~~filed herewith pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31(i).2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer filed herewith pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer ~~and Chief~~filed herewith pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2	Certification of the Principal Financial Officer filed herewith pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	PUBLICARD, INC.
	(Registrant)

Date: November ~~14, 2005~~16, 2006		/s/ ~~Antonio L. DeLise~~Joseph Sarachek
		~~Antonio L. DeLise, President,~~ ~~Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer~~ Joseph Sarachek
		Chief Executive Officer

3021

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit

Number

Description

10.1	Engagement Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2006, between PubliCARD, Inc. and Joseph Sarachek. Incorporated by reference from PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2006.

10.2	Addendum to Engagement Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2006, between PubliCARD, Inc. and Joseph E. Sarachek. Incorporated by reference from PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2006.

10.3	Indemnification Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2006, between PubliCARD, Inc. and Joseph E. Sarachek. Incorporated by reference from PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2006.

10.4	Stock Option Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2006, between PubliCARD, Inc. and Joseph E. Sarachek. Incorporated by reference from PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2006.

10.5	Non-Plan Stock Option Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2006, between PubliCARD, Inc. and Joseph E. Sarachek. Incorporated by reference from PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 27, 2006.

10.6	Payment, Retirement and Release Agreement dated as of July 27, 2006 by and between the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and PubliCARD, Inc. Incorporated by reference from PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 10-Q filed on July 28, 2006

10.7	Assignment of Shares and Assumption of Obligations Agreement dated as of October 13, 2006 between Sallyport Investment Partnership and PubliCARD, Inc. Incorporated by reference from PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 27, 2006.

10.8	Letter from TECSEC, Incorporated to PubliCARD, Inc., dated as of October 13, 2006. Incorporated by reference to PubliCARD, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 27, 2006.

31(i).1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer filed herewith pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31(i).2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer filed herewith pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer filed herewith pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2	Certification of the Principal Financial Officer filed herewith pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004

Net loss, as reported	$	(312	)	$	(3,082	)	$	(1,484	)	$	(4,368	)
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense
determined under fair value based method		(4	)		(35	)		(4	)		(95	)
Pro forma net loss	$	(316	)	$	(3,117	)	$	(1,488	)	$	(4,463	)

Basic and diluted loss per share:
As reported	$	(.01	)	$	(.12	)	$	(.06	)	$	(.18	)
Pro forma	$	(.01	)	$	(.13	)	$	(.06	)	$	(.18	)

Interest cost	$	348
Expected return on plan assets		(87	)
Amortization of net loss		84
Net periodic pension cost	$	345