Three Months Ended September 30, 2010 Options Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance at July 1, 2010 68,965 $ 11.26
Exercised (7,960 ) 8.11
Balance at September 30, 2010 61,005 $ 11.67

Three months Ended March 31, 2010	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance at January 1, 2010		86,995	$	10.61
Exercised		-		-
Balance at March 31, 2010		86,995	$	10.61

Options exercisable at March 31, 2011		11,303	$	8.11
		4,870	$	8.54

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Options Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance at January 1, 2010 86,995 $ 10.61
Exercised (25,325 ) 8.11
Exercised (665 ) 8.54
Balance at September 30, 2010 61,005 $ 11.67

Options exercisable at September 30, 2010 16,062 $ 8.11
5,776 $ 8.54

Three Months Ended September 30, 2009 Options Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance at July 1, 2009 87,696 $ 10.59
Exercised (701 ) 8.11
Balance at September 30, 2009 86,995 $ 10.61

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009 Options Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance at January 1, 2009 115,937 $ 9.99
Exercised (27,490 ) 8.11
Exercised (1,452 ) 8.54
Balance at September 30, 2009 86,995 $ 10.61

Options exercisable at September 30, 2009 9,576 $ 8.11
3,614 $ 8.54

All share and per share data have been restated to reflect a 10% stock dividend declared on August 26, 2010.

NOTE 4: Shareholders' Equity

A regular quarterly cash dividend of $.10 per share was declared on March ~~25, 2010~~24, 2011 for shareholders of record at April ~~9, 2010,~~8, 2011, payable April 30, 2010. On June 24, 2010 a cash dividend of $.10 per share was declared for shareholders of record July 9, 2010, payable on July 30, 2010. On August 26, 2010 the Company declared a 10% stock dividend to shareholders of record September 10, 2010, payable September 24, 2010.29, 2011. Income per common share for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 was calculated as follows:

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

INCOME
(NUMERATOR)

SHARES
(DENOMINATOR)

PER SHARE
AMOUNT

Net income $ 821,601

Basic income available to common shareholders $ 821,601 4,424,936 $ .19

Effect of dilutive options -

Diluted income available to common shareholders $ 821,601 4,424,936 $ .19

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010

INCOME
(NUMERATOR)

SHARES
(DENOMINATOR)

PER SHARE
AMOUNT

Net income $ 2,277,310

Basic income available to common shareholders $ 2,277,310 4,412,138 $ .52

Effect of dilutive options -

Diluted income available to common shareholders $ 2,277,310 4,412,138 $ .52

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009

INCOME
(NUMERATOR)

SHARES
(DENOMINATOR)

PER SHARE
AMOUNT

Net income $ 136,521

Basic income available to common shareholders $ 136,521 4,402,994 $ .03

Effect of dilutive options -

Diluted income available to common shareholders $ 136,521 4,402,994 $ .03

	FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011
	INCOME (NUMERATOR)		SHARES (DENOMINATOR)		PER SHARE AMOUNT

Net income	$	649,368

Basic income available to common shareholders	$	649,368		4,430,705	$	.14

Effect of dilutive options				6,865

Diluted income available to common shareholders	$	649,368		4,437,570	$	.14

	FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010
	INCOME (NUMERATOR)		SHARES (DENOMINATOR)		PER SHARE AMOUNT

Net income	$	726,867

Basic income available to common shareholders	$	726,867		4,403,201	$	..16

Effect of dilutive options				-

Diluted income available to common shareholders	$	726,867		4,403,201	$	.16

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009

INCOME
(NUMERATOR)

SHARES
(DENOMINATOR)

PER SHARE
AMOUNT

Net income $ 1,598,884

Basic income available to common shareholders $ 1,598,884 4,386,668 $ .36

Effect of dilutive options 1,001

Diluted income available to common shareholders $ 1,598,884 4,387,669 $ .36

All share and per share data have been restated to reflect a 10% stock dividend declared on August 26, 2010.

The future payment of cash dividends is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and depends upon a number of factors, including future earnings, financial condition, cash requirements, and general business conditions. Cash dividends when declared, are paid by the Bank to the Company for distribution to shareholders of the Company. Certain regulatory requirements restrict the amount of dividends which the Bank can pay to the Company.

NOTE 5: Comprehensive Income

The Company applies accounting standards which establish guidance for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general purpose financial statements. Comprehensive income consists of net income and net unrealized gains or losses on securities and is presented in the consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income.

Comprehensive income totaled ~~$2,601,360~~$1,038,296 at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and ~~$1,744,759~~$738,504 at ~~September 30, 2009. For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, comprehensive income totaled $1,377,417 and $550,267, respectively.~~March 31, 2010.

NOTE 6: Fair Value Measurements

Effective January 1, ~~2009,~~2008, the Company adopted accounting standards which provide a framework for measuring and disclosing fair value under generally accepted accounting principles. The guidance requires disclosures about the fair value of assets and liabilities recognized in the balance sheet in periods subsequent to initial recognition, whether the measurements are made on a recurring basis (for example, available-for-sale investment securities) or on a nonrecurring basis (for example, impaired loans).

119

The standard defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The standard also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1		Valuation is based upon quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as US Treasuries and money market funds.

Level 2		Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 2 assets and liabilities include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments, mortgage-backed securities, municipal bonds, corporate debt securities and derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain derivative contracts and impaired loans.

Level 3		Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption based on unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are typically based on an entity’s own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.

Investment Securities Available for Sale

Investment securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. At ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, ~~and September 30, 2009,~~ the Company’s investment portfolio was comprised of a US Treasury ~~Note,~~Notes, Government Sponsored Enterprises and Municipal Securities. The portfolio did not contain any mortgage-backed securities. Fair value measurement is based upon prices obtained from third party pricing services that use independent pricing models which rely on a variety of factors including reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, benchmark yields, economic and industry events and other relevant market information. As such, these securities are classified as Level 2.

1210

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

The Company originates fixed ~~and variable~~ rate residential loans on a servicing released basis in the secondary market. Loans closed but not yet settled with other investors, are carried in the Company’s loans held for sale portfolio. These loans are fixed rate residential loans that have been originated in the Company’s name and have closed. Virtually all of these loans have commitments to be purchased by investors and the majority of these loans were locked in by price with the investors on the same day or shortly thereafter that the loan was locked in with the Company’s customers. Therefore, these loans present very little market risk for the Company. The Company usually delivers to, and receives funding from, the investor within 30 days. Commitments to sell these loans to the investor are considered derivative contracts and are sold to investors on a “best efforts" basis. The Company is not obligated to deliver a loan or pay a penalty if a loan is not delivered to the investor. As a result of the short-term nature of these derivative contracts, the fair value of the mortgage loans held for sale in most cases is the same as the value of the loan amount at its origination. These loans are classified as Level 2.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, ~~2009~~2010 are as follows:

	Quoted Market Price in active markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance at March 31, 2011
US Treasury Note	$	21,206,016	$	-	$	-	$	21,206,016
Government Sponsored Enterprises	$	-	$	3,032,509	$	-	$	3,032,509
Municipal Securities	$	-	$	24,779,250	$	-	$	24,779,250
Mortgage loans to be sold	$	-	$	2,119,227	$	-	$	2,119,227
Total	$	21,206,016	$	29,930,986	$	-	$	51,137,002

	Quoted Market Price in active markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance at September 30, 2010		Quoted Market Price in active markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance at December 31, 2010
US Treasury Note	$	3,037,500	$	-	$	-	$	3,037,500	$	9,023,437	$	-	$	-	$	9,023,437
Government Sponsored Enterprises	$	-	$	9,199,929	$	-	$	9,199,929	$	-	$	6,100,545	$	-	$	6,100,545
Municipal Securities	$	-	$	24,501,260	$	-	$	24,501,260	$	-	$	24,255,631	$	-	$	24,255,631
Mortgage loans held for sale	$	-	$	6,676,235	$	-	$	6,676,235
Mortgage loans to be sold									$	-	$	5,908,316	$	-	$	5,908,316
Total	$	3,037,500	$	40,377,424	$	-	$	43,414,924	$	9,023,437	$	36,264,492	$	-	$	45,287,929

Quoted
Market Price
in active
markets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

Balance
at
December 31, 2009

US Treasury Note $ 3,118,594 $ - $ - $ 3,118,594
Government Sponsored Enterprises $ - $ 12,541,819 $ - $ 12,541,819
Municipal Securities $ - $ 21,201,932 $ - $ 21,201,932
Mortgage loans held for sale - 3,433,460 - $ 3,433,460
Total $ 3,118,594 $ 37,177,211 $ - $ 40,295,805

1311

Other Real Estate Owned (OREO)

Loans, secured by real estate, are adjusted to fair value upon transfer to other real estate owned (OREO). Subsequently, OREO is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraisal, the Company records the OREO as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the asset as nonrecurring Level 3.

Impaired Loans

The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with ASC 310-10, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan”.

In accordance with this standard, the fair value is estimated using one of the following methods: fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell, discounted cash flows, or market value of the loan based on similar debt. The fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell is the most frequently used method. Typically, the Company reviews the most recent appraisal and if it is over 12 months old will request a new third party appraisal. Depending on the particular circumstances surrounding the loan, including the location of the collateral, the date of the most recent appraisal and the value of the collateral relative to the recorded investment in the loan, management may order an independent appraisal immediately or, in some instances, may elect to perform an internal analysis. Specifically as an example, in situations where the collateral on a nonperforming commercial real estate loan is out of the Company’s primary market area, management would typically order an independent appraisal immediately, at the earlier of the date the loan becomes nonperforming or immediately following the determination that the loan is impaired. However, as a second example, on a nonperforming commercial real estate loan where management is familiar with the property and surrounding areas and where the original appraisal value far exceeds the recorded investment in the loan, management may perform an internal analysis whereby the previous appraisal value would be reviewed and adjusted for recent conditions including recent sales of similar properties in the area and any other relevant economic trends. These valuations are reviewed at a minimum on a quarterly basis.

Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. At ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, ~~and September 30, 2009,~~ substantially all of the total impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. In accordance with ASC 820, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3.

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an on going basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The following table presents the assets and liabilities carried on the balance sheet by caption and by level within the valuation hierarchy (as described above) as of ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 for which a nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and twelve months ended December 31, 2010.

1412

~~Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are as follows as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.~~

	Quoted Market Price in active markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance at March 31, 2011
Impaired loans	$	-	$	4,644,770	$	-	$	4,644,770
Other real estate owned	$	-	$	659,430	$	-	$	659,430
Total	$	-	$	5,304,200	$	-	$	5,304,200

	Quoted Market Price in active markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Balance at December 31, 2010
Impaired loans	$	-	$	3,559,528	$	-	$	3,559,528
Other real estate owned	$	-	$	659,492	$	-	$	659,492
Total	$	-	$	4,219,020	$	-	$	4,219,020

Quoted
Market Price
in active
markets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

Balance
at
September 30, 2010

Impaired loans $ - $ 3,306,181 $ - $ 3,306,181
Other real estate owned $ - $ 659,430 $ - $ 659,430
Total $ - $ 3,965,611 $ - $ 3,965,611

Quoted
Market Price
in active
markets
(Level 1)

Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)

Balance
at
December 31, 2009

Impaired loans $ - $ 2,502,002 $ - $ 2,502,002
Total $ - $ 2,502,002 $ - $ 2,502,002

The Company has no assets or liabilities whose fair values are measured using level 3 inputs.

Accounting standards require disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments whether or not recognized on the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. Fair value estimates are made as of a specific point in time based on the characteristics of the financial instruments and the relevant market information. Where available, quoted market prices are used. In other cases, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. These techniques involve uncertainties and are significantly affected by the assumptions used and the judgments made regarding risk characteristics of various financial instruments, discount rates, prepayments, estimates of future cash flows, future expected loss experience and other factors. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates. Derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may or may not be realized in an immediate sale of the instrument.

Under the accounting standard, fair value estimates are based on existing financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of the assets and liabilities that are not financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts of existing financing instruments do not represent the underlying value of those instruments on the books of the Company.

The following describes the methods and assumptions used by the Company in estimating the fair values of financial instruments:

a. ~~Cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits in other banks and federal funds sold~~

a.	Cash and due from banks, interest bearing deposits in other banks and federal funds sold

The carrying value approximates fair value. All mature within 90 days and do not present unanticipated credit concerns.

b. ~~Investment securities available for sale~~

b.	Investment securities available for sale

The fair value of investment securities is derived from quoted market prices.

1513

c. ~~Loans~~

Loans

The carrying values of variable rate consumer and commercial loans and consumer and commercial loans with remaining maturities of three months or less, approximate fair value. The fair values of fixed rate consumer and commercial loans with maturities greater than three months are determined using a discounted cash flow analysis and assume the rate being offered on these types of loans by the Company at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, ~~2009,~~2010, approximate market.

The carrying value of mortgage loans held for sale approximates fair value.

For lines of credit, the carrying value approximates fair value.

d. ~~Other real estate owned~~

Deposits

Other real estate owned is carried at the lower of carrying value or fair value on a non-recurring basis, based upon independent appraisals or management’s estimation of the fair value of the collateral.

e. ~~Deposits~~

The estimated fair value of deposits with no stated maturity is equal to the carrying amount. The fair value of time deposits is estimated by discounting contractual cash flows, by applying interest rates currently being offered on the deposit products. The fair value estimates for deposits do not include the benefit that results from the low cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities as compared to the cost of alternative forms of funding (deposit base intangibles).

f. ~~Short-term borrowings~~

e.	Short-term borrowings

The carrying amount approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

The estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, ~~2009~~2010 are as follows:

	March 31, 2011
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value

Cash and due from banks	$	6,210,726	$	6,210,726
Interest bearing deposits in other banks		8,309		8,309
Federal funds sold		34,227,475		34,227,475
Investments available for sale		49,017,775		49,017,775
Loans (1)		206,831,723		208,420,615
Deposits		268,173,854		268,942,172
Short-term borrowings		414,432		414,432

	December 31, 2010
	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value

Cash and due from banks	$	5,404,379	$	5,404,379
Interest bearing deposits in other banks		8,302		8,302
Federal funds sold		19,018,104		19,018,104
Investments available for sale		39,379,613		39,379,613
Loans (1)		213,916,674		218,670,423
Deposits		250,436,975		250,750,331
Short-term borrowings		767,497		767,497

(1)	Includes mortgage loans to be sold

September 30, 2010

Carrying
Amount

Estimated
Fair Value

Cash and due from banks $ 5,930,713 $ 5,930,713
Interest bearing deposits in other banks 8,299 8,299
Federal funds sold 20,265 20,265
Investment securities available for sale 36,738,689 36,738,689
Loans (1) 215,888,241 220,576,578
Other real estate owned 659,430 659,430
Deposits 230,377,252 230,659,046
Short-term borrowings 761,056 761,056

1614

December 31, 2009

Carrying
Amount

Estimated
Fair Value

Cash and due from banks $ 5,794,540 $ 5,794,540
Interest bearing deposits in other banks 8,269 8,269
Federal funds sold 3,779,693 3,779,693
Investments available for sale 36,862,345 36,862,345
Loans (1) 217,315,936 222,968,621
Other real estate owned - -
Deposits 229,837,680 230,081,062
Short-term borrowings 8,006,753 8,006,753

~~(1) Includes mortgage loans to be sold~~

NOTE 7: Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

The following is a summary of recent authoritative pronouncements that could impact the accounting, reporting and/or disclosure of financial information by the Company.

Income Tax guidance was amended by FASB in April 2010 to reflect an SEC Staff Announcement after the President signed the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 on March 30, 2010, which amended the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed on March 23, 2010. According to the announcement, although the bills were signed on separate dates, regulatory bodies would not object if the two Acts were considered together for accounting purposes. This view is based on the SEC staff’s understanding that the two Acts together represent the current health care reforms as passed by Congress and signed by the President. The amendment had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In July 2010, the Receivables topic of the ~~ASC~~Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) was amended by Accounting Standards Update (“ASU) 2010-20 to require expanded disclosures related to a company’s allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. The amendments ~~will~~ require the allowance ~~disclosure~~disclosures to be provided on a disaggregated basis. The Company is required to ~~begin to comply with the~~include these disclosures in their interim and annual financial statements. See the discussion on “Allowance for Loan Losses”.

Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) required by ASU 2010-20 were deferred by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in ASU 2011-01 issued in January 2011. In April 2011 FASB issued ASU 2011-02 to assist creditors with their determination of when a restructuring is a TDR. The determination is based on whether the restructuring constitutes a concession and whether the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties as both events must be present. Disclosures related to TDRs under ASU 2010-20 will be effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2011. The Company does not expect this to have an impact on its financial ~~statements for the year ended December 31, 2010.~~statements.

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which significantly changes the regulation of financial institutions and the financial services industry. The Dodd-Frank Act includes several provisions that will affect how community banks, thrifts, and small bank and thrift holding companies will be regulated in the future. Among other things, these provisions abolish the Office of Thrift Supervision and transfer its functions to the other federal banking agencies, relax rules regarding interstate branching, allow financial institutions to pay interest on business checking accounts, change the scope of federal deposit insurance coverage, and impose new capital requirements on bank and thrift holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act also establishes the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection as an independent entity within the Federal Reserve, which will be given the authority to promulgate consumer protection regulations applicable to all entities offering consumer financial services or products, including banks. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act includes a series of provisions covering mortgage loan origination standards affecting originator ~~compensations,~~compensation, minimum repayment standards, and pre-payments. Management is actively reviewing the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and assessing its probable impact on ~~our~~the business, financial condition, and results of ~~operations.~~operations of the Company.

In August 2010, two updates were issued to amend various SEC rules and schedules pursuant to Release No. 33-9026: Technical Amendments to Rules, Forms, Schedules and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies and based on the issuance of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 112. The amendments related primarily to business combinations, ~~and~~ removed references to “minority interest” and added references to “controlling” and “noncontrolling ~~interest(s)~~interests(s)”. The updates were effective upon issuance but had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Also in December 2010, the Business Combinations topic of the ASC was amended to specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendment also requires that the supplemental pro forma disclosures include a description of the nature and amount of any material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. This amendment is effective for the Company for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2011, although early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the amendment to have any impact on its financial statements.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 8: Subsequent Events

None

Subsequent events are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. Recognized subsequent events are events or transactions that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. Non-recognized subsequent events are events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after that date. Management has reviewed events occurring through the date the financial statements were available to be issued and no subsequent events have occurred requiring accrual or disclosure.

ITEM 2

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

OR PLAN OF OPERATION

Management’s discussion and analysis is included to assist shareholders in understanding the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flow. This discussion should be reviewed in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements (unaudited) and notes included in this report and the supplemental financial data appearing throughout this report. Since the primary asset of the Company is its wholly-owned subsidiary, most of the discussion and analysis relates to the Bank.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other portions of this quarterly report contain certain “forward-looking statements” concerning the future operations of the Bank of South Carolina Corporation. Management desires to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1996 and is including this statement for the express purpose of availing the Company of protections of such safe harbor with respect to all “forward-looking statements” contained in this Form 10-Q. The Company has used “forward-looking statements” to describe future plans and strategies including its expectations of the Company’s future financial results. The following are cautionary statements. Management’s ability to predict results or the effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. A variety of factors may affect the operations, performance, business strategy and results of the Company including, but not limited to the following:

Risk from changes in economic, monetary policy, and industry conditions

Changes in interest rates, shape of the yield curve, deposit rates, the net interest margin and funding sources

Market risk (including net income at risk analysis and economic value of equity risk analysis) and inflation

Risk inherent in making loans including repayment risks and changes in the value of collateral

Loan growth, the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, provisions for loan losses, and the assessment of problem loans

Level, composition, and re-pricing characteristics of the securities portfolio

Deposit growth, change in the mix or type of deposit products and services

Continued availability of senior management

Technological changes

Ability to control expenses

Changes in compensation

Risks associated with income taxes including potential for adverse adjustments

Changes in accounting policies and practices

Changes in regulatory actions, including the potential for adverse adjustments

Recently enacted or proposed legislation

Current disarray in the financial service ~~industry,~~

~~Risk of deflation.~~industry.

~~Such forward looking~~

All forward-looking statements ~~speak only~~in this report are based on information available to the Company as of the date ~~on which such~~of this report. Although Management believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are ~~made and shall~~reasonable, Management cannot guarantee that these expectations will be ~~deemed to be updated by any future filings made by the Company with the SEC.~~achieved. The Company will undertake no obligation to update any ~~forward looking~~forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. In addition, certain statements in future filings by the Company with the SEC, in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by or with the approval of the Company, which are not statements of historical fact, constitute forward looking statements.

Overview

Bank of South Carolina Corporation (the Company) is a financial institution holding company headquartered in Charleston, South Carolina, with ~~$261.3~~$299.1 million in assets as of ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and net income of ~~$821,601 and $2,277,310~~$649,368 for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011. The Company offers a broad range of financial services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, The Bank of South Carolina (the Bank). The Bank is a state-chartered commercial bank which operates principally in the Charleston, Dorchester and Berkeley counties of South Carolina. The Bank’s original and current concept is to be a full service financial institution specializing in personal service, responsiveness, and attention to detail to foster long standing relationships.

The following is a discussion of the Company’s financial condition as of ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 as compared to December 31, ~~2009~~2010 and the results of operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. The discussion and analysis identifies significant factors that have affected the Company’s financial position and operating results and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes included in this report.

The Company derives most of its income from interest on loans and investments (interest bearing assets). The primary source of funding for making these loans and investments is the Company’s ~~deposits, on which the Company pays interest. Consequently, one~~interest and non-interest bearing deposits. One of the key measures of the Company’s success is the amount of net interest income, or the difference between the income on its interest earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the expense on its interest bearing liabilities, such as deposits. Another key measure is the spread between the yield the Company earns on these interest bearing assets and the ~~rate~~yield the Company pays on its interest-bearing liabilities.

There are risks inherent in all loans; therefore, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb estimated losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible. The Company established and maintains this allowance ~~by charging~~based on a ~~provision for loan losses against its operating earnings. In~~methodology representing the ~~following section~~lending environment it operates within. For a detailed discussion on the ~~Company has included a discussion of this process, as well as several tables describing its~~ allowance for loan losses ~~and the allocation of this allowance among its various categories of loans.~~see “Provision for Loan Losses”.

The Company’s results of operations depend not only on the level of its net interest income from loans and investments, but also on its non-interest income and its operating expenses. Net interest income depends upon the volumes, rates and mix associated with interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities which result in the net interest spread. The Company’s net interest spread for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 was ~~4.17% and 4.15%, respectively,~~3.82% compared to ~~3.90% and 3.95%~~4.18% for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010.

Non-interest income includes fees and other expenses charged to customers. A more detailed discussion of interest income, non-interest income and operating expenses follows.

For three months ended March 31, 2011, the Bank has paid $425,000 to the Company for dividend payments.

1917

~~For nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Bank has paid $1,275,000 to the Company for dividend payments.~~

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The Company has adopted various accounting policies that govern the application principles generally accepted in the United States and with general practices within the banking industry in the preparation of its financial statements. The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in the footnotes to its unaudited consolidated financial statements as of ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and its notes included in the consolidated financial statements in its ~~2009~~2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC.

Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by the Company that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. The Company considers these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgment and assumptions the Company uses are based on historical experience and other factors, which the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the number of the judgments and assumptions the Company makes, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates that could have a material impact on the carrying values of its assets and liabilities and its results of operations.

The Company considers its policies regarding the allowance for loan losses to be its most subjective accounting policy due to the significant degree of ~~management~~Management judgment. The Company has developed what it believes to be appropriate policies and procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, recognizing that this process requires a number of assumptions and estimates with respect to its loan portfolio. The Company’s assessments may be impacted in future periods by changes in economic conditions, the impact of regulatory examinations and the discovery of information with respect to borrowers which were not known by ~~management~~Management at the time of the issuance of the consolidated financial statements. For additional discussion concerning the Company’s allowance for loan losses and related matters, see “Allowance for Loan Losses.”

BALANCE SHEET

LOANS

The Company focuses its lending activities on small and middle market businesses, professionals and individuals in its geographic markets. At ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 outstanding loans ~~(less~~(plus deferred loan fees of ~~$5,123)~~$23,692) totaled ~~$209,212,006~~$206,855,415 which equaled ~~90.81%~~77.13% of total deposits and ~~80.08%~~69.15% of total assets. ~~The major components of the loan portfolio were commercial loans and commercial real estate loans totaling 23.25% and 52.42%, respectively of total loans.~~ Substantially all loans were to borrowers located in the Company’s market areas in the counties of Charleston, Dorchester and Berkeley in South Carolina.

Because lending activities comprise such a significant source of revenue, the Company’s main objective is to adhere to sound lending practices. The Loan Committee of the Board of Directors meets monthly to evaluate the adequacy of the Allowance for Loan Losses and to review all loans resulting in credit exposure of $10,000.

The breakdown of total loans by type and the respective percentage of total loans are as follows:

	March 31,						December 31,
	2011			2010			2010
Commercial loans	$	50,459,661		$	47,710,071		$	50,601,639
Commercial real estate		105,619,466			111,002,283			108,004,910
Residential mortgage		15,720,208			18,986,636			16,071,839
Consumer loans		5,382,125			5,159,686			5,361,197
Personal banklines		27,307,356			28,225,043			27,734,166
Other		223,680			247,944			234,607

Total		204,712,496			211,331,663			208,008,358
Deferred loan fees (net)		23,692			(856	)		17,306
Allowance for loan losses		(2,763,745	)		(3,077,261	)		(2,938,588	)

Loans, net	$	201,972,443		$	208,253,546		$	205,087,076

September 30, December 31,
2010 2009 2009
Commercial loans $ 48,644,578 $ 45,025,696 $ 46,086,649
Commercial real estate 109,665,410 114,190,915 117,044,598
Residential mortgage 17,290,712 21,383,693 18,682,428
Consumer loans 5,333,294 5,699,769 5,534,351
Personal banklines 28,007,273 24,519,797 26,269,420
Other 265,616 186,139 277,899

Total 209,206,883 211,006,009 213,895,345
Deferred loan fees (net) 5,123 (27,046 ) (12,869 )
Allowance for loan losses (2,683,980 ) (2,013,259 ) (3,026,997 )

Loans, net $ 206,528,026 $ 208,965,704 $ 210,855,479

2018

										March 31,						December 31,
Percentage of Loans	September 30,						December 31,			2011			2010			2010
	2010			2009			2009
Commercial loans		23.25	%		21.34	%		21.55	%		24.65	%		22.58	%		24.33	%
Commercial real estate		52.42	%		54.12	%		54.72	%		51.59	%		52.53	%		51.92	%
Residential mortgage		8.26	%		10.13	%		8.73	%		7.68	%		8.98	%		7.73	%
Consumer loans		2.55	%		2.70	%		2.59	%		2.63	%		2.44	%		2.58	%
Personal banklines		13.39	%		11.62	%		12.28	%		13.34	%		13.36	%		13.33	%
Other		.13	%		.09	%		0.13	%		.11	%		.11	%		0.11	%

Total		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%

	March 31,						December 31,
Percentage of Deposits	2011			2010			2010
Non-interest bearing demand		21.41	%		20.55	%		22.71	%
Interest bearing demand		20.41	%		22.27	%		20.12	%
Money Market accounts		30.13	%		28.52	%		27.16	%
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and over		16.89	%		16.62	%		18.18	%
Other time deposits		6.58	%		7.15	%		7.09	%
Other savings deposits		4.58	%		4.89	%		4.74	%

Total Deposits		100.00	%		100.00	%		100.00	%

While ~~these~~deposit fluctuations are normal in the Company’s business, in order to reduce its cost of funds the Company has tried to reduce the amount of its outstanding Certificates of deposit greater than $100,000 as a current business strategy. Overall deposits have increased 14.64% from March 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011 and 7.08% from December 31, 2010 to March 31, 2011. This increase is the result of the Company’s business development efforts and the strength of the Bank.

SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

The Bank has a demand note through the US Treasury, Tax and Loan system with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. The Bank may borrow up to $1,000,000 at ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 ~~and 2009~~ under the arrangement at an interest rate set by the Federal Reserve. The note is secured by Government Sponsored Enterprise Securities with a market value of ~~$1,086,004~~$1,112,665 at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and ~~$1,122,021~~$1,073,450 at ~~September 30, 2009.~~December 31, 2010. The amount outstanding under the note totaled ~~$261,056~~$414,432 and ~~$213,896~~$767,497 at ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, ~~and 2009,~~ respectively. At ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had ~~$500,000~~no outstanding in federal funds ~~purchased. The Company has~~purchased with the option to borrow up to ~~$28,000,000~~$26,000,000 on short term lines of credit. The Company has also established a Borrower-In-Custody arrangement with the Federal Reserve. This arrangement permits the Company to retain possession of loans pledged as collateral to secure advances from the Federal Reserve Discount Window. The Company established this arrangement as a secondary source of liquidity. As of ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 the Company could borrow up to ~~$63,362,905.~~$62,477,724 and $63,389,913, respectively. There have been no borrowings under this ~~arrangement since it was established.~~arrangement.

On April 8, 2010, the Company paid off its $7,500,000 loan with the Federal Reserve Bank’s Term Auction Facility (TAF). The Company established this loan on March 11, 2010 at a rate of .50% for a term of 28 days. The Board of Governor’s of the Federal Reserve System established this program to allow depository institutions to place a bid for an advance from its local Federal Reserve Bank at a fixed interest rate determined via a centralized single-price auction.

Comparison of Three Months Ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 to Three Months Ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010

Net income ~~increased $685,080~~decreased $77,499 or ~~501.81%~~10.66% to ~~$821,601,~~$649,368, or basic and diluted earnings per share of ~~$.19~~$.14 and ~~$.19,~~$.14, respectively, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, from ~~$136,521,~~$726,867, or basic and diluted earnings per share of ~~$.03~~$.16 and ~~$.03,~~$.16, respectively, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. The ~~increase~~decrease in net income between periods is primarily due to ~~a $920,000 decrease~~an increase in ~~the loan loss provision. This decrease was based on~~other operating expenses including an ~~evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance.~~increase in overall auditing fees and an increase in data processing fees. Average earning assets increased ~~$2.7~~$22.1 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 as compared to the same period in ~~2009.~~2010. Average earning assets were ~~$256.9~~$278.5 million during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 as compared to ~~$254.2~~$256.4 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. Average loans ~~increased $6.6~~decreased $8.3 million or ~~3.19%~~3.84% to ~~$212.8~~$208.9 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 as compared to ~~$206.2~~$217.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009. The Company realized an increase in net interest income of $178,638 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2009 as a result of a 23 basis point increase in the net interest margin.March 31, 2010.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income, the major component of the Company’s net income, ~~increased $178,638~~decreased $33,884 or ~~6.80%~~1.23% to ~~$2,805,199~~$2,712,766 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, from ~~$2,626,561~~$2,746,650 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. This ~~increase was~~decrease is primarily due to ~~an increase~~a decrease of $54,857 or 2.05% in interest and fees on loans as well as a decrease of $45,392 in interest and dividends on investment securities. Average loans decreased $8,344,882 or 3.84% and average investments increased $6,990,038 or 17.23%. The Company had a $3 million US Treasury Note with a yield of 4.87%, a $3 million Government Sponsored Security with a yield of 5.69%, and a $160 thousand Municipal Security with a yield of 4.38%, mature during the three months ended March 31, 2011. The Company reinvested in $6 million in US Treasury Notes that are yielding between 1.25% and 1.35%, a significant decrease in the ~~net interest margin. The net interest margin increased 23 basis points from 4.10% to 4.33%.~~yield on the Company’s investments. The yields on interest earning assets ~~increased 9~~decreased 51 basis points to ~~4.73%~~4.29% from ~~4.64%~~4.81%. The cost of interest bearing liabilities during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 was ~~0.55%~~0.47% as compared to ~~0.74%~~0.63% for the same period in ~~2009,~~2010, a decrease of 1916 basis points. ~~Interest rates remain~~Also contributing to the decline in net interest income was the increase in Federal Funds Sold during the quarter ended March 31, 2011, which averaged $25.7 million at ~~historically low levels; however,~~a yield of .17% as compared to $2.3 million at a yield of .19% during the Company maintains a large percentage of non-interest bearing deposits which support the Company’s funding sources resulting in a strong interest margin. In addition the Company is evaluating its loan pricing to determine if the rate is appropriate and repricing the loans as needed.quarter ended March 31, 2010.

2523

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The adequacy of the allowance for loan losses (the “Allowance”) is reviewed monthly by the Loan Committee and on a quarterly basis by the Board of Directors. For purposes of this analysis, adequacy is defined as a level sufficient to absorb estimated losses in the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date presented. The methodology employed for this analysis was modified in 2007, 2008 and ~~2009~~2010 to better reflect the economic environment and regulatory guidance. The revised methodology is based on a Reserve Model that is comprised of the three components listed below.

Specific Reserve analysis for impaired loans based on FASB ASC 310-10-35.

General reserve analysis applying historical loss rates based on FASB ASC 450-20.

Qualitative or environmental factors.

Loans are reviewed for impairment which is measured in accordance with FASB ASC 310-10-35. Impaired loans can either be secured or unsecured, not including large groups of smaller balance loans that are collectively evaluated. Impairment is measured by the difference between the loan amount and the present value of the future cash flow discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or, alternatively the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. An impaired loan may not represent an expected loss.

A general reserve analysis is performed on individually reviewed loans, but not impaired loans, and excluded individually reviewed impaired loans, based on FASB ASC 450-20. Historical losses are segregated into risk-similar groups and a loss ratio is determined for each group over a three year period. The three year average loss ratio by type is then used to calculate the estimated loss based on the current balance of each group. The three year historical loss percentage for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 was .34% and ~~September 30, 2009 was .33% and .91%~~.16%, respectively.

Qualitative and environmental factors include external risk factors that Management believes are representative of the overall lending environment of the Bank. Management believes that the following factors create a more comprehensive system of controls in which the Bank can monitor the quality of the loan portfolio.

Portfolio risk

National and local economic trends and conditions

Effects of changes in risk selection and underwriting practices

Experience, ability and depth of lending management staff

Industry conditions

Effects of changes in credit concentrations

Loan and credit administration risk

Portfolio risk includes the levels and trends in delinquencies, impaired loans and changes in the loan rating matrix, trends in volume and terms of loans and overmargined real estate lending. Management is satisfied with the stability of the past due and non-performing loans and believes there has been no decline in the quality of the loan portfolio due to any trend in delinquent or adversely classified loans. Although the aggregate total of classified loans has increased, management is confident in the adequacy of the sources of repayment. Sizable unsecured principal balances on a non-amortizing basis are monitored. Within the portfolio risk factor the Company elected to increase the risk percentage for “trends in volume and term of loan”. ~~Loans have decreased .85% or approximately $1,799,126 from September 30, 2009 to September 30, 2010.~~ In addition the Company elected to increase the risk percentage for “over margined real estate lending risk”. Although the vast majority of the Company’s real estate loans are underwritten on a cash flow basis, the secondary source of repayment is typically tied to the Company’s ability to realize on the collateral. Given the contraction in real estate values, the Company closely monitors its loan to value. The Company recently amended its Loan Policy to ~~allow for a maximum 80%~~reduce the collateral advance ~~percentage~~rate from 85% to 80% on all real estate ~~transactions.~~transactions, with the exception of raw land at 65% and land development at 70%.

2624

Occasional extensions of credit occur beyond the policy thresholds of the Company’s normal collateral advance margins for real estate lending. These loans are monitored and the balances reported to the Board every quarter. An excessive level of this practice could result in additional examiner scrutiny, competitive disadvantages and potential losses if forced to convert the collateral. The consideration of overmargined real estate loans directly relates to the capacity of the borrower to repay. Management often ~~request~~requests additional collateral to bring the loan to value ratio within the policy guidelines and also require a strong secondary source of repayment in addition to the primary source of repayment.

Although significantly under the threshold of 100% of capital (currently approximately $29 million), the Company’s list and number of over margined real estate loans currently totals approximately ~~$13.8~~$14.9 million or approximately ~~6.42%~~7.18% of its loan portfolio.

Management revised the credit rating matrix in order to rate all extensions of credit providing a more specified picture of the risk each loan poses to the quality of the loan portfolio. There are eight possible ratings based on ten different qualifying characteristics. The ten characteristics are: cash flow, collateral quality, guarantor strength, financial condition, management quality, operating performance, the relevancy of the financial statements, historical loan performance, debt service coverage and the borrower’s leverage. In an effort to place more emphasis on borrower’s cash flow a weighted average method is used to determine the loan grade with cash flow, financial conditions, and debt service coverage being weighted triple and financial statements being weighted double. The matrix is designed to meet management’s standards and expectations of loan quality. In addition to the rating matrix, the Company rates its credit exposure on the basis of each loan and the quality of each borrower.

National and local economic trends and conditions are constantly changing and results in both positive and negative impact on borrowers. Most macroeconomic conditions are not controllable by the Company and are incorporated into the qualitative risk factors. Natural and environmental disasters, wars and the recent fallout of the subprime lending market as well as problems in the traditional mortgage market are a few of the trends and conditions that are currently affecting the Company’s national and local economy. Changes in the national and local economy have impacted borrowers’ ability, in many cases, to repay loans in a timely manner. On occasion a loan’s primary source of repayment (i.e., personal income, cash flow, or lease income) may be eroded as a result of unemployment, lack of revenues, or the inability of a tenant to make rent payments.

The quality of the Bank’s loan portfolio is contingent upon its risk selection and underwriting practices. Every credit with over $100,000 in exposure is summarized by the Bank’s Credit Department and reviewed by the Loan Committee on a monthly basis. The Board of Directors review credits over $500,000 monthly with an annual credit analysis conducted on credits in excess of $350,000 upon the receipt of updated financial information. Prior to any extension of credit, every significant commercial loan goes through sound credit underwriting. The Credit Department conducts detailed cash flow analysis on each proposal using the most current financial information. Relevant trends and ratios are evaluated.

The Bank has over 300 years of lending management experience among twelve members of its lending staff. In addition to the lending staff the Bank has an Advisory Board for each branch comprised of business and community leaders from the specific branch’s market area. Management meets with these boards quarterly to discuss the trends and conditions in each respective market. Management is aware of the many challenges currently facing the banking industry. Assessing banks to replenish the insurance fund and its corresponding impact on bank profits, increased regulatory scrutiny in and or on lending practices, and pending changes in deposit and or funding source type and mix, continue to impact the Company’s environment. As other banks look to increase earnings in the short term, the Company will continue to emphasize the need to maintain its sound lending practices and core deposit growth.

There has been an influx of new banks over the last several years within the Company’s geographic area. This increase has decreased the local industry’s overall margins as a result of pricing competition. Management believes that the borrowing base of the Bank is well established and therefore unsound price competition is not necessary.

2725

The risks associated with the effects of changes in credit concentration include loan concentration, geographic concentration and regulatory concentration.

As of ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, there were only four Standard Industrial Code groups that comprised more than three percent of the Bank’s total outstanding loans. The four groups are activities related to real estate, offices and clinics of doctors, real estate agents and managers, and legal services.

The Company is located along the coast and on an earthquake fault, increasing the chances that a natural disaster may impact the Bank and its borrowers. The Company has a Disaster Recovery Plan in place; however, the amount of time it would take for its customers to return to normal operations is unknown.

Loan and credit administration risk includes collateral documentation, insurance risk and maintaining financial information risk.

The majority of the Bank’s loan portfolio is collateralized with a variety of its borrower’s assets. The execution and monitoring of the documentation to properly secure the loan is the responsibility of the Bank’s lenders and Loan Department. The Bank requires insurance coverage naming the Bank as the mortgagee or loss payee. Although insurance risk is also considered collateral documentation risk, the actual coverage, amounts of coverage and increased deductibles are important to management.

Risk includes a function of time during which the borrower’s financial condition may change; therefore, keeping financial information up to date is important to the Bank. The policy of the Bank is that all new loans, regardless of the customer’s history with the Bank, should have updated financial information, as long as exposure is greater than $10,000. In addition the Company is monitoring appraisals closely as real estate values continue to decline.

The aforementioned changes to the Company’s Allowance for Loan Loss methodology were not made as a result of dramatic or patterned history of loan losses, increases in past due loans, or non-performing assets, but rather because of specific changes in the Company’s lending environment. These changes precipitated the need for additional reserves in a period of time when the Company’s loan portfolio grew significantly (three months ended ~~September 30, 2009)~~March 31, 2010). Based on the evaluation described above, the Company recorded a provision for loan losses during the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010 of ~~$190,000, compared to a provision of $1,110,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2009.~~$120,000, respectively. At ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 the three year average loss ratios were: .57% Commercial, ~~.55%~~.48% Consumer, ~~.50%~~.49% 1-4 Residential, .00% Real Estate Construction and ~~.04%~~.14% Real Estate Mortgage. The three year historical loss ratio used at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 was ~~.33%~~.34% compared to ~~.91%~~.163% at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010.

During the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, charge-offs of ~~$626,503~~$303,403 and recoveries of ~~$4,261~~$8,559 were recorded to the allowance resulting in an allowance for loan losses of ~~$2,683,980~~$2,763,745 or ~~1.24%~~1.35% of total loans, compared to charge-offs of ~~$261,918~~$71,356 and recoveries of ~~$857~~$1,621 resulting in an allowance loan losses of ~~$2,013,259~~$3,077,261 or ~~.95%~~1.46% of total loans at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010.

The Bank had impaired loans totaling ~~$3,306,161~~$4,644,770 as of ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, compared to ~~$1,844,204~~$2,721,896 as of ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. The impaired loans at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 include ~~four~~six non-accrual loans with a combined balance of ~~$844,376.~~$1,345,211. Impaired loans at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 included ~~four~~six non-accrual loans with a combined balance of ~~$240,667.~~$1,100,852. Included in the impaired loans at ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, is one credit totaling $1,023,000 which is secured by a second mortgage. Management does not know of any loans which will not meet their contractual obligations that are not otherwise discussed herein.

2826

The accrual of interest is generally discontinued on loans, which become 90 days past due as to principal or interest. The accrual of interest on some loans, however, may continue even though they are 90 days past due if the loans are well secured or in the process of collection and management deems it appropriate. If non-accrual loans decrease their past due status to less than 30 days for a period of three months, they are reviewed individually by management to determine if they should be returned to accrual status. There ~~was one loan over 90 days past due still accruing interest totaling $104,103 as of September 30, 2010 and~~were no loans over 90 days past due still accruing interest ~~as of September 30, 2009.~~at March 31, 2011 or March 31, 2010.

Net charge-offs for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 were ~~$622,242~~$294,844 compared to net charge-offs of ~~$261,061~~$69,735 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. Uncertainty in the economic outlook still exists, making charge-off levels in future periods less predictable; however, loss exposure in the portfolio is identified, reserved and closely monitored to ensure that changes are promptly addressed in the analysis of reserve adequacy.

The Company had ~~$360,953 of~~$122,562 unallocated reserves at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 related to other inherent risk in the portfolio compared to unallocated reserves of ~~$382,615~~$694,943 at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. Management believes this amount is appropriate and properly supported through the environmental factors of its Allowance for Loan Losses. Management believes the allowance for loan losses at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 is adequate to cover estimated losses in the loan portfolio; however, assessing the adequacy of the allowance is a process that requires considerable judgment. Management's judgments are based on numerous assumptions about current events which it believes to be reasonable, but which may or may not be valid. Thus there can be no assurance that loan losses in future periods will not exceed the current allowance amount or that future increases in the allowance will not be required. No assurance can be given that management's ongoing evaluation of the loan portfolio in light of changing economic conditions and other relevant circumstances will not require significant future additions to the allowance, thus adversely affecting the operating results of the Company.

The Allowance is also subject to examination testing by regulatory agencies, which may consider such factors as the methodology used to determine adequacy and the size of the Allowance relative to that of peer institutions, and other adequacy tests. In addition, such regulatory agencies could require the Company to adjust its allowance based on information available to them at the time of their examination.

The methodology used to determine the reserve for unfunded lending commitments, which is included in other liabilities, is inherently similar to that used to determine the allowance for loan losses adjusted for factors specific to binding commitments, including the probability of funding and historical loss ratio. During the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, no entry was made to the allowance for unfunded loans and commitments leaving a balance of $20,825.

The following is a summary of the non-accrual loans as of March 31, 2011.

Loans Receivable on Non-Accrual at March 31, 2011

Commercial	$	6,043
Commercial Real Estate:
Commercial Real Estate - Construction		-
Commercial Real Estate - Other		838,768
Consumer Real Estate		500,400
Total	$	1,345,211

The following is a schedule of the Bank’s delinquent loans, excluding mortgage loans held for sale and deferred loan fees, as of March 31, 2011.

March 31, 2011	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		Greater Than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable		Recorded Investment > 90 Days and Accruing
Commercial	$	144,759		57,883		-		202,642		50,253,661		50,456,303		-
Commercial Real Estate:										4,127,548		4,127,548
Commercial Real Estate - Other		1,793,000		322,669		486,390		2,602,059		98,289,860		100,891,919		-
Consumer:
Consumer - Real Estate				317,500				317,500		43,803,174		44,120,674
Consumer - Other		49,337		-				49,337		5,544,382		5,593,719		-
Total	$	1,987,096		698,052		486,390		3,171,538		202,018,625		205,190,163		-

As of March 31, 2011 loans individually evaluated and considered impaired are presented in the following table:

Impaired and Restructured Loans For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011

	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	83,350	$	6,043	$	-	$	9,450	$	34,055
Commercial Real Estate		1,997,543		2,021,209		-		2,012,407		354,097
Consumer Real Estate		599,786		599,354		-		599,636		133,198

Total	$	2,680,679	$	2,626,606	$	-	$	2,621,493	$	521,350

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	1,211,163	$	1,205,663	$	1,205,663	$	807,846	$	41,714
Commercial Real Estate		126,000		90,959		86,084		87,431		17,702
Consumer Real Estate		725,000		721,542		263,215		721,542		250,995

Total	$	2,062,163	$	2,018,164	$	1,554,962	$	1,616,819	$	310,411

The following table illustrates credit risks by category and internally assigned grades.

March 31, 2011	Commercial		Commercial Real Estate Construction		Commercial Real Estate Other		Residential – Real Estate		Consumer – Other
Pass	$	44,066,319	$	3,652,773	$	93,582,288		42,333,818		4,941,212
Watch		3,121,517		474,775		3,299,525		89,108		313,918
OAEM		1,925,601		-		426,124		376,852		230,142
Sub-Standard		1,342,866		-		3,583,982		1,320,896		106,824
Doubtful		-		-		-		-		1,623
Loss		-		-		-		-		-
						-		-		-
Total	$	50,456,303	$	4,127,548	$	100,891,919		44,120,674		5,593,719

The following table sets forth the changes in the allowance and an allocation of the allowance by loan category. The allocation of the allowance may be made for specific loans, but the entire allowance is available for any loan that, in Management’s judgment, should be charged-off. The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are individually classified as impaired. The general component covers non-impaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for current economic factors described above.

March 31, 2011	Commercial		Commercial Real Estate		Consumer		Residential		Finance Leases		Total		Unallocated
Allowance for Loan Losses
Beginning Balance	$	1,213,865	$	2,115,641	$	-	$	230,022	$	-	$	2,938,588	$	592,647
Charge-offs		-		303,403		-		-		-		303,403
Recoveries		3,559		5,000		-		-		-		8,559
Provisions		-		120,000		-		-		-		120,000		(470,085	)
Ending Balance		1,217,424		1,937,238		-		230,022		-		2,763,744		122,562
Ending Balances:
Individually evaluated for impairment		1,211,706		2,112,168		-		1,320,896		-		4,644,770
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	49,244,597	$	102,907,299	$	5,593,719	$	42,799,778	$	-	$	200,545,393	$

Other Income

Other income for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, increased ~~$45,887~~$8,574 or ~~8.91%~~2.04% to ~~$560,989~~$429,327 from ~~$515,102~~$420,753 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. This increase is primarily due to a increase in mortgage banking income of ~~$117,044~~$11,385 or ~~62.70%~~6.82% to ~~$303,713~~$178,263 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 as compared to ~~$186,669~~$166,878 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009. Although the mortgage crisis continues, mortgage rates are at a historic low allowing for new home purchases and current home owners to refinance at lower rates.~~March 31, 2010. During the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, the Company originated ~~$26,428,480~~$12,315,708 in mortgage loans ~~- an increase~~a decrease of ~~$2,713,060 or 11.44%~~$1,732,344 compared to ~~$23,715,420~~March 31, 2010. However, the service release premium increased $28,171 to $265,805 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009. The Company realized a gain~~March 31, 2011 compared to 2010. This was offset by an increase in discount points paid of ~~$57,756 on~~$22,605 to $83,618. With fewer originations, commissions paid to the sale of investment securities during the three months ended September 30, 2009 with no gain or loss realized during the three months ended September 30, 2010. In addition, the Company realized a loss of $13,347 on the sale of other real estate owned in the three months ended September 30, 2010.

mortgage lenders decreased $2,286.

Other Expense

Bank overhead increased ~~$140,161~~$110,770 or ~~7.54%~~5.57% to ~~$1,998,737~~$2,096,436 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, from ~~$1,858,576~~$1,985,666 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009. Salaries and employee benefits~~March 31, 2010. Net occupancy expense increased ~~$59,489~~$23,892 or ~~5.55%~~7.69% to ~~$1,131,616~~$334,478 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010, from $1,072,127~~March 31, 2011 as compared to $310,586 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009. Salaries and wages increased due~~March 31, 2010. During 2010 the Company moved its Mortgage Department from its main banking house at 256 Meeting Street to ~~annual merit increases. In addition the Board~~a new office on Morrison Drive in Charleston, SC. This move resulted in an increase in rental expense of ~~Directors increased the monthly contribution to the ESOP from $10,000~~$2,000 a month as well as an increase in ~~2009 to $20,000 in 2010.~~utilities. Other operating expenses increased ~~$64,780~~$83,334 or ~~13.82%~~16.40% to ~~$533,578~~$591,558 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, from ~~$468,798~~$508,224 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. Data processing fees increased $22,036, due to the addition of remote capture and eCorp (online banking for corporations). The Company saw an increase of $24,174 in audit fees and a decrease in legal fees of $8,941 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 Audit fees increased due to additional audits required with the addition of new products. Legal fees decreased as a result of fewer billing hours related to foreclosed properties. The other changes in non-interest expense categories reflect normal modest fluctuations between the two periods.

Income Tax Expense

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, the Company’s effective tax rate was ~~30.22%~~29.85% compared to ~~21.13%~~31.54% during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009.~~

~~Comparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009~~

Net income increased $678,426 or 42.43% to $2,277,310, or basic and diluted earnings per share of $.52 and $.52, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from $1,598,884, or basic and diluted earnings per share of $.36 and $.36, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in net income between periods is primarily due to a decrease in the provision for loan losses from $1,274,000 for the nine months ended SeptemberMarch 31, ~~2009 to $420,000 for the nine months ended September 30,~~ 2010. This decrease was based on an evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. Average earning assets increased $11.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. Average earning assets were $254.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $243.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Average loans increased $13.9 million or 7.01% to $212.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $198.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. The Company realized an increase in net interest income of $649,407 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2009 as a result of a 15 basis point increase in the net interest margin.

~~Net Interest Income~~

Net interest income, the major component of the Company’s net income, increased $649,407 or 8.56% to $8,233,843 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from $7,584,434 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This increase was due to an increase in the net interest margin. The net interest margin increased 15 basis points from 4.17% to 4.32%. The yields on interest earning assets increased 3 basis point to 4.75% from 4.72%. The cost of interest bearing liabilities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was 0.60% as compared to 0.77% for the same period in 2009 - a decrease of 17 basis points. Interest rates remain at historically low levels; however, the Company maintains a large percentage of non-interest bearing deposits which support the Company’s funding sources resulting in a strong interest margin.

~~Allowance for Loan Losses~~

The allowance for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $420,000 compared to $1,274,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $763,016 compared to $690,576 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $778,819 with recoveries of $15,803 resulting in an allowance for loan losses of $2,683,980 or 1.28% of total loans. This compares to charge-offs of $694,383 and recoveries of $3,807 for a total allowance of $2,013,259 or .95% of total loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Loss exposure in the portfolio is identified, reserved and closely monitored to ensure that changes are promptly addressed in the analysis of the reserve.

~~Other Income~~

Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, decreased $307,738 or 17.45% to $1,455,328 from $1,763,066 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in mortgage banking income of $93,838 or 12.22% to $674,294 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $768,132 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Mortgage origination fees, discount fees and service release premiums decreased as a result of a lower level of refinancing activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the same period in 2009. In addition, changes to underwriting and appraisal requirements established by FNMA and FHLMC as well as changes in regulatory environment have resulted in making it harder for individuals to qualify for loans The largest change in other income came from a realized gain of $180,071 on the sale of investment securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 with no gain or loss realized during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. The Company realized a loss of $13,347 on the sale of other real estate owned during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

~~Other Expense~~

Bank overhead increased $336,515 or 5.97% to $5,974,960 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from $5,638,445 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Salaries and employee benefits increased $272,804 or 8.64% to $3,429,996 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from $3,157,192 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Salaries and wages increased due to annual merit increases, a four month overlap of the retiring Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the incoming CFO, and the advancement of a management trainee to a loan officer. In addition the Board of Directors increased the monthly contribution to the ESOP from $10,000 in 2009 to $20,000 in 2010. Other operating expenses increased $62,551 or 4.16% from $1,503,952 at September 30, 2009, to $1,566,503 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. Data processing fees increased $28,949 due in part to the new programs branch capture and eCorp online banking. In addition legal fees increased $28,734. These increases were offset by a decrease in fees paid to the FDIC by 16.84% to $250,199 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, from $300,875 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.

~~Income Tax Expense~~

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company’s effective tax rate was 30.96% compared to 34.34% during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.~~

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

In the normal course of operations, the Company engages in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in the financial statements, or are recorded in amounts that differ from the notional amounts. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used by the Company for general corporate purposes or for customer needs. Corporate purpose transactions are used to help manage credit, interest rate and liquidity risk or to optimize capital. Customer transactions are used to manage customer’s requests for funding.

The Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements consist principally of commitments to extend credit described below. The Company estimates probable losses related to binding unfunded lending commitments and records a reserve for unfunded lending commitment in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The balance of the reserve was $20,825 at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 and ~~2009.~~2010. The Company had no interests in non-consolidated special purpose entities.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The amount of collateral obtained if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit is based on management's credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, negotiable instruments, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and real estate. Commitments to extend credit, including unused lines of credit, amounted to ~~$47,091,393~~$45,451,474 and ~~$50,266,385~~$41,352,245 at ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and 2010, ~~and 2009,~~ respectively.

3130

Standby letters of credit represent an obligation of the Company to a third party contingent upon the failure of the Company’s customer to perform under the terms of an underlying contract with the third party or obligates the Company to guarantee or stand as surety for the benefit of the third party. The underlying contract may entail either financial or nonfinancial obligations and may involve such things as the shipment of goods, performance of a contract, or repayment of an obligation. Under the terms of a standby letter, generally drafts will be drawn only when the underlying event fails to occur as intended. The Company can seek recovery of the amounts paid from the borrower. The majority of these standby letters of credit are unsecured. Commitments under standby letters of credit are usually for one year or less. The maximum potential amount of undiscounted future payments related to standby letters of credit at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 was $532,613 and ~~2009, was~~ $521,610 ~~respectively.~~at March 31, 2010.

The Company originates certain fixed rate residential loans and commits these loans for sale. The commitments to originate fixed rate residential loans and the sale commitments are freestanding derivative instruments. The fair value of the commitments to originate fixed rate conforming loans was not significant at ~~September 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011. The Company has forward sales commitments, totaling ~~$6.7~~$2.1 million at ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, to sell loans held for sale of ~~$6.7~~$2.1 million. The fair value of these commitments was not significant at ~~September 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011. The Company has no embedded derivative instruments requiring separate accounting treatment.

Liquidity

The Company must maintain an adequate liquidity position in order to respond to the short-term demand for funds caused by withdrawals from deposit accounts, extensions of credit and for the payment of operating expenses. Primary liquid assets of the Company are cash and due from banks, federal funds sold, investments available for sale, other short-term investments and mortgage loans held for sale. The Company’s primary liquid assets accounted for ~~18.90%~~30.61% and ~~21.52%~~21.25% of total assets at ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and 2010, ~~and 2009,~~ respectively. Proper liquidity management is crucial to ensure that the Company is able to take advantage of new business opportunities as well as meet the credit needs of its existing customers. Investment securities are an important tool in the Company's liquidity management. Securities classified as available for sale may be sold in response to changes in interest rates and liquidity needs. All of the securities presently owned by the Bank are classified as available for sale. At ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, the Bank had short-term lines of credit totaling approximately ~~$28,000,000~~$26,000,000 (which are withdrawable at the lender's option), with anno outstanding balance ~~of $500,000~~ at ~~September 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011. Additional sources of funds available to the Bank for ~~additional~~ liquidity needs include borrowing on a short-term basis from the Federal Reserve System, increasing deposits by raising interest rates paid and selling mortgage loans for sale. In order to establish a secondary source of liquidity, the Company has established a Borrower-In-Custody arrangement with the Federal Reserve. This arrangement permits the Company to retain possession of assets pledged as collateral to secure advances from the Federal Reserve Discount Window. As of ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 the Company could borrow up to ~~$62,362,905.~~$62,477,724. There have been no borrowings under this ~~arrangement since it~~arrangement. In addition, on March 11, 2010 the Company borrowed $7,500,000 from the Federal Reserve Bank’s Term Auction Facility (TAF) at a rate of .50% for a term of 28 days (paid off on April 8, 2010). The Board of Governor’s of the Federal Reserve System established this program to allow depository institutions to place a bid for an advance from its local Federal Reserve Bank at a fixed interest rate determined via centralized single-price auction. The collateral pledged to secure advances from the Federal Reserve Discount Window, serves as collateral. This loan was ~~established.~~paid off on April 8, 2010.

The Company’s core deposits consist of non-interest bearing accounts, NOW accounts, money market accounts, time deposits and savings accounts. The Company closely monitors its reliance on certificates of deposit greater than $100,000 and other large deposits. The Company's management believes its liquidity sources are adequate to meet its operating needs and does not know of any trends, events or uncertainties that may result in a significant adverse effect on the Company's liquidity position. At ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and 2010, ~~and 2009,~~ the Bank's liquidity ratio was ~~7.43%~~23.97% and ~~8.48%~~10.68%, respectively.

3231

Capital Resources

The capital needs of the Company have been met to date through the $10,600,000 in capital raised in the Bank’s initial offering, the retention of earnings less dividends paid and the exercise of stock options for total shareholders' equity at ~~September 30, 2010~~March 31, 2011 of ~~$29,138,029.~~$29,339,537. The rate of asset growth since the Bank's inception has not negatively impacted this capital base. The risk-based capital guidelines for financial institutions are designed to highlight differences in risk profiles among financial institutions and to account for off balance sheet risk. The guidelines established require a risk based capital ratio of 8% for bank holding companies and banks. The risk based capital ratio at ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, for the Bank is ~~12.87%~~13.15% and at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 was ~~11.92%~~12.76%. The Company's management does not know of any trends, events or uncertainties that may result in the Company's capital resources materially increasing or decreasing.

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory – and possibly additional discretionary – actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material effect on the financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total and Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and to average assets. Management believes, as of ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, that the Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

At ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and 2010, ~~and 2009,~~ the Company and the Bank were categorized as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as “well capitalized” the Company and the Bank must maintain minimum total risk based, Tier 1 risk based and Tier 1 leverage ratios of 10%, 6% and 5%, respectively, and to be categorized as “adequately capitalized,” the Company and the Bank must maintain minimum total risk based, Tier 1 risk based and Tier 1 leverage ratios of 8%, 4% and 4%, respectively. There are no current conditions or events that management believes would change the Company’s or the Bank’s category.

ITEM 3

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required.

ITEM 4

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls and procedures for financial reporting

An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of Bank of South Carolina Corporation’s management, including its Principal Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer/ Executive Vice President and Treasurer, of the effectiveness of Bank of South Carolina Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~September 30, 2010.~~March 31, 2011. Based on that evaluation, Bank of South Carolina Corporation’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer/Executive Vice President and Treasurer, has concluded that Bank of South Carolina Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. During the period ending ~~September 30, 2010,~~March 31, 2011, there was no change in Bank of South Carolina Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Bank of South Carolina Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.

3332

The Company established a Disclosure Committee on December 20, 2002. The committee is made up of the President and Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer/Executive Vice President and Treasurer, Executive Vice President, Vice President (Audit Compliance Officer), Vice President (Accounting), ~~Assistant~~ Vice President (Credit Department) and Vice President (Operations and Technology). This Committee meets quarterly to review the 10Q and or the 10K, to assure that the financial statements, Securities and Exchange Commission filings, and all public releases are free of any material misstatements and correctly reflect the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company. This Committee also assures that the Company is in compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

The Disclosure Committee establishes a calendar each year to assure that all filings are reviewed and filed in a proper manner. The calendar includes the dates of the Disclosure Committee meetings, the dates that the 10Q and or the 10K are sent to its independent accountants and to its independent counsel for review as well as the date for the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors to review the reports.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company and its subsidiary from time to time are involved as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions incident to its business. These actions are not believed to be material either individually or collectively to the consolidated financial condition of the Company or its subsidiary.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Not required.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

~~None~~.

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

~~None~~.

None.

Item 4. Removed and Reserved

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

1.	The Consolidated Financial Statements are included in this Form 10-Q and listed on pages as indicated.

		Page
(1)	Consolidated Balance Sheets		3
(2)	Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010		4
(3)	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income		5
(4)	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		6
(5)	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		7-16

South Carolina		57-1021355
(State or other jurisdiction of		(IRS Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification Number)

~~Large accelerated filer~~	¨	~~Accelerated Filer~~	¨
~~Non-accelerated filer~~	¨	~~Smaller reporting Company~~	x

	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
	March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	6,210,726		$	5,404,379
Interest bearing deposits in other banks		8,309			8,302
Federal funds sold		34,227,475			19,018,104
Investment securities available for sale		49,017,775			39,379,613
Mortgage loans to be sold		2,119,227			5,908,316
Loans		204,736,188			208,025,664
Allowance for loan losses		(2,763,745	)		(2,938,588	)
Net loans		201,972,443			205,087,076
Premises and equipment, net		2,406,099			2,436,526
Other real estate owned		659,430			659,492
Accrued interest receivable		933,805			1,054,791
Other assets		1,567,266			1,564,668

Total assets	$	299,122,555		$	280,521,267

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing demand	$	57,417,806		$	56,884,235
Interest bearing demand		54,724,732			50,394,101
Money market accounts		80,809,316			68,007,823
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and over		45,280,146			45,523,280
Other time deposits		17,647,120			17,760,278
Other savings deposits		12,294,734			11,867,258
Total deposits		268,173,854			250,436,975

Short-term borrowings		414,432			767,497
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		1,194,732			597,913
Total liabilities		269,783,018			251,802,385

Common Stock - No par value;
12,000,000 shares authorized; Shares issued 4,651,148
at March 31, 2011 and 4,649,317 at December 31, 2010;
Shares outstanding 4,431,697 at March 31, 2011
and 4,429,866 shares at December 31, 2010		-			-
Additional paid in capital		28,228,467			28,202,939
Retained earnings		2,374,126			2,167,927
Treasury stock – 219,451 shares at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010		(1,902,439	)		(1,902,439	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of income taxes		639,383			250,455

Total shareholders' equity		29,339,537			28,718,882

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	299,122,555		$	280,521,267

	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009

Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	5,930,713		$	5,794,540
Interest bearing deposits in other banks		8,299			8,269
Federal funds sold		20,265			3,779,693
Investment securities available for sale		36,738,689			36,862,345
Mortgage loans to be sold		6,676,235			3,433,460
Loans		209,212,006			213,882,476
Allowance for loan losses		(2,683,980	)		(3,026,997	)
Net loans		206,528,026			210,855,479
Premises and equipment, net		2,455,869			2,516,189
Other real estate owned		659,430			-
Accrued interest receivable		950,986			1,152,240
Other assets		1,288,561			1,512,543
Total assets	$	261,257,073		$	265,914,758

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity:
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing demand	$	55,482,876		$	48,394,049
Interest bearing demand		49,546,790			49,257,712
Money market accounts		59,189,446			63,965,862
Certificates of deposit $100,000 and over		36,233,303			41,929,687
Other time deposits		18,111,503			16,943,042
Other savings deposits		11,813,334			9,347,328
Total deposits		230,377,252			229,837,680

Short-term borrowings		761,056			8,006,753
Accrued interest payable and other liabilities		980,736			503,128
Total liabilities		232,119,044			238,347,561

Common Stock - No par value;
12,000,000 shares authorized; Shares issued 4,645,724 at September 30, 2010 and 4,622,652 at December 31, 2009; Shares outstanding 4,426,273 at September 30, 2010 and 4,403,201 shares at December 31, 2009		-			-
Additional paid in capital		28,158,442			23,511,560
Retained earnings		1,777,711			4,968,336
Treasury stock – 219,451 shares at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009		(1,902,439	)		(1,692,964	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of income taxes		1,104,315			780,265

Total shareholders' equity		29,138,029			27,567,197

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	261,257,073		$	265,914,758

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011		2010
Interest and fee income
Interest and fees on loans	$	2,616,584	$	2,671,441
Interest and dividends on investment securities		321,555		366,947
Other interest income		10,565		1,066
Total interest and fee income		2,948,704		3,039,454

Interest expense
Interest on deposits		235,938		285,439
Interest on short-term borrowings		-		7,365
Total interest expense		235,938		292,804

Net interest income		2,712,766		2,746,650
Provision for loan losses		120,000		120,000
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		2,592,766		2,626,650

Other income
Service charges, fees and commissions		245,887		248,281
Mortgage banking income		178,263		166,878
Other non-interest income		5,177		5,594
Total other income		429,327		420,753

Other expense
Salaries and employee benefits		1,170,400		1,166,856
Net occupancy expense		334,478		310,586
Other operating expenses		591,558		508,224
Total other expense		2,096,436		1,985,666

Income before income tax expense		925,657		1,061,737
Income tax expense		276,289		334,870
Net income	$	649,368	$	726,867

Basic earnings per share	$	0.14	$	0.16
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.14	$	0.16

Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic		4,430,705		4,403,201
Diluted		4,437,570		4,403,201

Cash Dividend Per Share	$	0.10	$	0.10

		Page		~~Page~~
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Consolidated Balance Sheets – ~~September 30, 2010~~
March 31, 2011 and December 31, ~~2009~~2010			3
~~Consolidated Statements of Income - Three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009~~			4
Consolidated Statements of Income – ~~Nine~~
Three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and 2010 ~~and 2009~~		5	4
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income ~~- Nine~~–
Three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and 2010 ~~and 2009~~		6	5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows ~~- Nine~~–
Three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2011 and 2010 ~~and 2009~~		7	6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		8	7

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations		18	16
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements		31	30
Liquidity		32	31
Capital Resources		33	32

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		33	32

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		33	32

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		34	33
Item 1A	Risk Factors		34	33
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		34	33
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		34	33
Item 4.	Removed and Reserved		34	33
Item 5.	Other Information		34	33
Item 6.	Exhibits		34	33

Signatures			35
Certifications

	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010			2009
Interest and fee income
Interest and fees on loans	$	7,942,061		$	7,454,735
Interest and dividends on investment securities		1,104,226			1,135,287
Other interest income		7,421			10,916
Total interest and fee income		9,053,708			8,600,938

Interest expense
Interest on deposits		811,175			1,007,424
Interest on short-term borrowings		8,692			9,080
Total interest expense		819,867			1,016,504

Net interest income		8,233,841			7,584,434
Provision for loan losses		420,000			1,274,000
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		7,813,841			6,310,434

Other income
Service charges, fees and commissions		773,508			796,165
Mortgage banking income		674,294			768,132
Gain on sale of securities		-			180,071
Loss on other real estate owned		(13,347	)		-
Other non-interest income		20,873			18,698
Total other income		1,455,328			1,763,066

Other expense
Salaries and employee benefits		3,429,996			3,157,192
Net occupancy expense		978,461			977,301
Other operating expenses		1,566,503			1,503,952
Total other expense		5,974,960			5,638,445

Income before income tax expense		3,294,209			2,435,055
Income tax expense		1,016,899			836,171
Net income	$	2,277,310		$	1,598,884

Basic earnings per share	$	0.52		$	0.36
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.52		$	0.36

Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic		4,412,138			4,386,668
Diluted		4,412,138			4,387,669

Cash Dividend Per Share	$	0.30		$	0.32

											Accumulated Other						Common Stock		Additional Paid In Capital		Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total
	Common		Additional		Retained			Treasury			Comprehensive
	Stock		Paid In Capital		Earnings			Stock			Income			Total

December 31, 2008	$	-	$	23,229,045	$	4,375,166		$	(1,692,964	)	$	896,817		$	26,808,064

Comprehensive income:

Net income		-		-		1,598,884			-			-			1,598,884

Net unrealized gain on securities (net of tax effect of $152,301)		-		-		-			-			259,322			259,322

Reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income (net of tax effect $66,624)		-		-		-			-			(113,447	)		(113,447	)

Comprehensive income		-		-		-			-			-			1,744,759

Exercise of stock options		-		235,315		-			-			-			235,315

Stock-based compensation expense		-		41,272		-			-			-			41,272

Cash dividends ($0.32 per common share)		-		-		(1,276,634	)		-			-			(1,276,634	)

September 30, 2009	$	-	$	23,505,632	$	4,697,366		$	(1,692,964	)	$	1,042,692		$	27,552,726

December 31, 2009	$	-	$	23,511,560	$	4,968,336		$	(1,692,964	)	$	780,265		$	27,567,197		$	-	$	23,511,560	$	4,968,336		$	(1,692,964	)	$	780,265	$	27,567,197

Comprehensive income:

Net income		-		-		2,277,310			-			-			2,277,310			-		-		726,867			-			-		726,867

Net unrealized gain on securities (net of tax effect of $142,863)		-		-		-			-			324,050			324,050
Net unrealized gain on securities (net of tax effect of $6,833)																		-		-		-			-			11,637		11,637

Comprehensive income																		-		-		-			-			-		738,504

Stock-based compensation expense																		-		11,800		-			-			-		11,800

Cash dividends ($0.10 per common share)																		-		-		(400,291	)		-			-		(400,291	)

March 31, 2010																	$	-	$	23,523,360	$	5,294,912		$	(1,692,964	)	$	791,902	$	27,917,210

December 31, 2010																	$	-	$	28,202,939	$	2,167,927		$	(1,902,439	)	$	250,455	$	28,718,882

Comprehensive income:

Net income																		-		-		649,368			-			-		649,368

Net unrealized gain on securities (net of tax effect of $177,549)																		-		-		-			-			388,928		388,928

Total comprehensive income		-		-		-			-			-			2,601,360			-		-		-			-			-		1,038,296

Exercise of stock options		-		181,386		-			-			-			181,386			-		14,850		-			-			-		14,850

Issuance of 10% stock dividend		-		4,429,847		(4,222,838	)		(209,475	)		-			(2,466	)

Stock-based compensation expense		-		35,649		-			-			-			35,649			-		10,678		-			-			-		10,678

Cash dividends ($0.30 per common share)		-		-		(1,245,097	)		-			-			(1,245,097	)
Cash dividends ($0.10 per common share)																		-		-		(443,169	)		-			-		(443,169	)

September 30, 2010	$	-	$	28,158,442	$	1,777,711		$	(1,902,439	)	$	1,104,315		$	29,138,029
March 31, 2011																	$	-	$	28,228,467	$	2,374,126		$	(1,902,439	)	$	639,383	$	29,339,537

	Three months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	649,368		$	726,867
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Depreciation		86,987			63,489
Provision for loan losses		120,000			120,000
Stock-based compensation expense		10,678			11,800
Net (accretion) and amortization of unearned discounts and premiums on investments		(25,435	)		13,093
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale		(12,315,707	)		(14,048,052	)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale		16,104,796			14,685,806
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable and other assets		(59,099	)		106,699
Increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities		153,650			336,952

Net cash provided by operating activities		4,725,238			2,016,654

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of investment securities available for sale		(15,206,250	)		-
Maturities of investment securities available for sale		6,160,000			-
Net decrease in loans		2,994,633			2,416,933
Purchase of premises and equipment		(56,560	)		(10,953	)
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned		-			65,000

Net cash (used) provided by investing activities		(6,108,177	)		2,470,980

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposit accounts		17,736,879			4,083,694
Net decrease in short-term borrowings		(353,065	)		(214,486	)
Stock options exercised		14,850			-

Net cash provided by financing activities		17,398,664			3,869,208

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		16,015,725			8,356,842
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		24,430,785			9,582,502

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	40,446,510		$	17,939,344

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow data:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	216,240		$	273,555
Income taxes	$	139,111		$	52,146

Supplemental disclosure for non-cash investing and financing activity:
Change in dividends payable	$	443,169		$	400,291
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned	$	-		$	65,000
Change in unrealized losses on available for sale securities	$	388,928		$	11,637

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	2,277,310		$	1,598,884
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Depreciation		181,349			161,393
Gain on sale of securities		-			(180,071	)
Provision for loan losses		420,000			1,274,000
Stock-based compensation expense		35,649			41,272
Net (accretion) and amortization of unearned discounts and premiums on investments		(23,726	)		33,201
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale		(56,369,804	)		(82,579,449	)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale		53,127,029			82,230,311
Increase in accrued interest receivable and other assets		(1,200,567	)		(675,660	)
Increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities		34,981			616,480

Net cash provided (used) by operating activities		(1,517,779	)		2,520,361

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of investment securities available for sale		(2,805,705	)		(11,959,800	)
Maturities and calls of investment securities available for sale		3,420,000			2,376,600
Net decrease (increase) in loans		4,648,923			(31,596,589	)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(121,029	)		(198,505	)
Proceeds from sale of available for sale securities		-			10,338,930
Purchase of other real estate owned		(101,300	)		-
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned		183,340			-

Net cash provided (used) by investing activities		5,224,229			(31,039,364	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposit accounts		539,572			20,366,649
Net (decrease) increase in short-term borrowings		(7,245,697	)		6,713,896
Dividends paid		(802,470	)		(1,912,940	)
Stock options exercised		181,386			235,315
Cash paid on fractional shares		(2,466	)		-
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities		(7,329,675	)		25,402,920

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(3,623,225	)		(3,116,083	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		9,582,502			20,212,538

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	5,959,277		$	17,096,455

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow data:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	906,047		$	1,009,280
Income taxes	$	1,080,404		$	920,348

Supplemental disclosure for non-cash investing and financing activity:
Change in dividends payable	$	442,627		$	(636,256	)
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned	$	741,470		$	-
Change in unrealized losses on available for sale securities	$	324,050		$	145,875

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011	Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance at January 1, 2011		88,831		$	11.51
Granted		5,000			11.67
Exercised		(1,831	)		8.11
Balance at March 31, 2011		92,000		$	11.59

Three Months Ended September 30, 2010	Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance at July 1, 2010		68,965		$	11.26
Exercised		(7,960	)		8.11
Balance at September 30, 2010		61,005		$	11.67

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010	Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance at January 1, 2010		86,995		$	10.61
Exercised		(25,325	)		8.11
Exercised		(665	)		8.54
Balance at September 30, 2010		61,005		$	11.67

Options exercisable at September 30, 2010		16,062		$	8.11
		5,776		$	8.54

Three Months Ended September 30, 2009	Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance at July 1, 2009		87,696		$	10.59
Exercised		(701	)		8.11
Balance at September 30, 2009		86,995		$	10.61

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009	Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance at January 1, 2009		115,937		$	9.99
Exercised		(27,490	)		8.11
Exercised		(1,452	)		8.54
Balance at September 30, 2009		86,995		$	10.61

Options exercisable at September 30, 2009		9,576		$	8.11
		3,614		$	8.54

INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO
	March 31, 2011			December 31, 2010
US Treasury Notes	$	21,247,394		$	9,055,078
Government-Sponsored Enterprises		3,006,709			6,013,897
Municipal Securities		23,748,779			23,913,091
	$	48,002,882		$	38,982,066

US Treasury Note		44.26	%		.03	%
Government-Sponsored Enterprises		6.27	%		20.09	%
Municipal Securities		49.47	%		79.88	%
		100.00	%		100.00	%

	September 30, 2010			September 30, 2009
US Treasury Note	$	2,994,342		$	2,976,860
Government-Sponsored Enterprises		9,018,723			12,028,603
Municipal Securities		22,972,743			20,858,408
	$	34,985,808		$	35,863,871

US Treasury Note		8.56	%		8.30	%
Government-Sponsored Enterprises		25.78	%		33.54	%
Municipal Securities		65.66	%		58.16	%
		100.00	%		100.00	%

	September 30, 2010								March 31, 2011
	AMORTIZED COST		GROSS UNREALIZED GAINS		GROSS UNREALIZED LOSSES		ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE		AMORTIZED COST		GROSS UNREALIZED GAINS		GROSS UNREALIZED LOSSES		ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE

U.S. Treasury Note	$	2,994,342	$	43,158	$	-	$	3,037,500	$	21,247,394	$	12,432	$	53,810	$	21,206,016
Government-Sponsored Enterprises		9,018,723		181,206		-		9,199,929		3,006,709		25,800		-		3,032,509
Municipal Securities		22,972,743		1,528,517		-		24,501,260		23,748,779		1,065,585		35,114		24,779,250

Total	$	34,985,808	$	1,752,881	$	-	$	36,738,689	$	48,002,882	$	1,103,817	$	88,924	$	49,017,775

December 31, 2009
	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses

U.S. Treasury Notes	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Government-Sponsored Enterprises		-		-		-		-		-		-
Municipal Securities		2,330,893		89,287		-		-		2,330,893		89,287

	$	2,330,893	$	89,287	$	-	$	-	$	2,330,893	$	89,287

DECMBER 31, 2010
	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
Description of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury Notes	$	6,015,469		40,425	$	-		-	$	6,015,469	$	40,425
Government-Sponsored Enterprises		-		-		-		-		-		-
Municipal Securities		8,468,976		234,922		-		-		8,468,976		234,922
Total	$	14,484,445		275,347	$	-		-	$	14,484,445	$	275,347

		Page

(1)	Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
(2)	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009	4
(3)	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009	5
(4)	Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income	6
(4)	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	7
(5)	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	8-18


	3.0	Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant (Filed with 1995 10-KSB)


	4.0	~~2009~~2010 Proxy Statement (Filed with ~~2009~~2010 10-K)


	10.0	Lease Agreement for 256 Meeting Street (Filed with 1995 10-KSB)


	10.1	Sublease Agreement for Parking Facilities at 256 Meeting Street (Filed with 1995 10-KSB)


	10.2	Lease Agreement for 100 N. Main Street, Summerville, SC (Filed with 1995 10-KSB)


	10.3	Lease Agreement for 1337 Chuck Dawley Blvd., Mt. Pleasant, SC (Filed with 1995 10-KSB)


	10.4	Lease Agreement for 1071 Morrison Drive, Charleston, SC (Filed with 2010 10K)

	10.5	1998 ~~Incentive~~Omnibus Stock ~~Option~~Incentive Plan (Filed with 2008 10K/A)

	~~10.5~~	2010 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (Filed with 2010 Proxy Statement)

	10.6	Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Filed with 2008 10K/A)

	~~10.6~~
	10.7	2010 Omnibus Incentive Stock Option Plan (Filed with 2010 Proxy Statement)


	21.0	List of Subsidiaries of the Registrant (Filed with 1995 10-KSB)

		The Registrant’ only subsidiary is The Bank of South Carolina (Filed with 1995 10KSB)

	31.1	Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) by Chief Executive Officer


	31.2	Certification pursuant to Section 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) by Chief Financial Officer

	BANK OF SOUTH CAROLINA CORPORATION

~~November 2, 2010~~
May 5, 2011	BY:	/s/Hugh C. Lane, Jr.
		Hugh C. Lane, Jr.
		President and Chief Executive Officer

	BY:	/s/Sheryl G. Sharry
		Sheryl G. Sharry
		Chief Financial Officer
		Executive Vice President & Treasurer