UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended:  SeptemberJune 30, 20102011

or

o¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to ______________
 
Commission File No. 000-24921

POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New York 65-0565144
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)

26022 Budde Road
The Woodlands, Texas 77380
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(281) 298-7944
(Issuer's Telephone Number, including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1394 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  x   No  o¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes  x   No  o¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes  o¨   No  x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN
BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE
PRECEDING FIVE YEARS

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes  o¨   No  o¨

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:  There were 472,237,565554,910,730 shares of the issuer’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, issued and outstanding on November 8, 2010.August 16, 2011.



TABLE OF CONTENTS

   Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
    
Item 1.Financial Statements 1
    
 Balance Sheets at SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 (unaudited) and December 31, 20092010 1
    
 
Statements of Operations for the three and nine monthssix month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 and2009 (unaudited) and the period beginning May 18, 2004 (date of entering developmentstage) through September 30, 2010 (unaudited)
2
Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit for all years subsequent to May 18, 2004 (date of entering development stage) and the nine months ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited)
3
Statements of Stockholders’ Deficit – Other Equity Items for all years subsequent to May 18, 2004 (date of entering development stage) and the nine months ended September 30, 2010 (unaudited)
4
Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (unaudited) and the period beginning May 18, 2004 (date of entering development stage) through SeptemberJune 30, 2011 (unaudited)
2
Statements of Cash Flows for the six month periods ended June  30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited) and the period beginning May 18, 2004 (date of entering development stage) through June 30, 2011 (unaudited)3
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited) 5
    
Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)6
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 21
    
Item 4T.Controls and Procedures 2928
    
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
 
   
Item 1.Legal Proceedings 2930
    
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 3132
    
Item 6.Exhibits 3233

i


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements.

 Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
 (A Development Stage Entity)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
 Balance SheetsBALANCE SHEETS

  September 30,    
  2010  December 31, 
  (Unaudited)  2009 
       
Assets      
       
Cash and equivalents $6,319  $- 
         
     Total current assets  6,319   - 
         
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of        
     $108,345 and $107,581 at September 30, 2010 and        
     December 31, 2009, respectively  2,244   683 
Deposits  11,332   5,000 
Other assets  100   100 
         
          Total assets $19,995  $5,783 
         
Liabilities and stockholders' deficit        
         
Accounts payable $1,213,217  $999,631 
Accounts payable – related party  433,406   96,507 
Notes payable  68,800   - 
Notes payable – in default  451,000   451,000 
Notes payable – related party  15,000   15,000 
Convertible debentures – in default  351,255   351,255 
Convertible debentures, net of unamortized discount of $-0-        
     and $21,621 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,        
     respectively  50,000   28,379 
Convertible debentures – related party  30,000   30,000 
Derivative liabilities  2,457,358   14,456,424 
Other current liabilities  760,296   593,891 
         
     Total current liabilities  5,830,332   17,022,087 
         
          Total liabilities  5,830,332   17,022,087 
         
Stockholders' deficit:        
         
Preferred Stock – $0.01 par value: 50,000,000 shares authorized;        
     1,500,000 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30,        
     2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively  1,500   1,500 
Common Stock – $0.001 par value: 600,000,000 shares authorized;        
     471,237,565 and 434,167,000 shares issued and outstanding as        
  of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively  471,237   434,167 
Additional paid-in capital  72,899,791   71,984,083 
Treasury stock  (16,000)  (16,000)
Common stock payable  135,000   135,000 
Deficit accumulated during development stage  (67,620,365)  (77,873,554)
Deficit accumulated before entering development stage  (11,681,500)  (11,681,500)
         
     Total stockholders' deficit  (5,810,337)  (17,016,304)
         
         Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit $19,995  $5,783 
  June 30,  December 31, 
   2011  2010 
   (Unaudited)    
ASSETS      
       
Property and equipment , net of accumulated depreciation  of $108,693 and $108,461 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively  1,896     2,128 
Deposits  11,332   11,332 
Other assets  100   100 
         
Total assets $13,328  $13,560 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT        
         
Current liabilities        
Accounts payable $1,460,290  $1,643,510 
Accounts payable – related parties  263,271   525,701 
Notes payable – related parties  225,933   154,482 
Notes payable- in default  501,000   501,000 
Notes payable- in default- related parties  80,000   80,000 
Convertible debentures- in default  272,176   303,853 
Derivative liabilities  431,414   1,460,472 
Other current liabilities  1,041,857   788,225 
Total current liabilities  4,275,941   5,457,243 
         
Total liabilities  4,275,941   5,457,243 
         
Stockholders’ deficit        
Preferred shares, par value $0.001; 50,000,000 authorized; 1,500,000 issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010
  1,500   1,500 
Common stock, par value $0.001; 600,000,000 shares authorized; 524,778,730 and 472,237,565 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010      524,779       472,237 
Additional paid in capital  73,825,914   72,994,212 
Treasury stock  (16,000)  (16,000)
Common stock payable  190,556   135,000 
Deficit accumulated during development stage  (67,107,862)  (67,349,132)
Deficit accumulated before entering development stage  (11,681,500)  (11,681,500)
           
Total stockholders’ deficit  (4,262,561)  (5,443,683)
         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit $13,328  $13,560 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
1

 Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Entity)
 Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
              Period From 
              May 18, 2004 
  For the Three Months Ended  For the Nine Months Ended Through 
  September 30,  September 30,  September 30, 
  2010  2009  2010  2009  2010 
                
Net revenue $-  $41,337  $-  $209,814  $542,249 
                   - 
Operating expenses:                  - 
Employee compensation and benefits  33,147   117,429   113,785   393,723   31,531,364 
Professional and consulting fees  654,920   382,533   1,153,419   1,007,868   17,382,188 
Impairment of goodwill  -   -   -   -   13,371,776 
Other selling, general and administrative expenses  95,028   65,753   394,684   216,287   2,581,005 
                     
Total operating expenses  783,095   565,715   1,661,888   1,617,878   64,866,333 
                     
Loss from operations  (783,095)  (524,378)  (1,661,888)  (1,408,064)  (64,324,084)
                     
Other income (expense):                    
Derivative gain (loss)  1,418,710   (9,211,930)  11,999,065   (9,368,581)  5,976,117 
Gain on legal settlement  -   -   -   -   36,764 
Interest income  -   -   -   -   7,867 
Gain (loss) on settlement of debt  -   (82,599)  -   (1,090,628)  1,582,872 
Interest expense  (23,782)  (53,662)  (83,988)  (368,497)  (5,763,282)
Mandatory prepayment penalty  -   -   -   -   (420,000)
Other income/(expense)  -   -   -   -   (194,886)
                     
Total other income/(expense)  1,394,928   (9,348,191)  11,915,077   (10,827,706)  1,225,452 
                     
Net income (loss)  611,833   (9,872,569)  10,253,189   (12,235,770)  (63,098,632)
                     
Deemed dividend  -   (13,012)  -   (47,115)  (1,140,760)
                     
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $611,833  $(9,885,581) $10,253,189  $(12,282,885) $(64,239,392)
                     
Net income (loss) per share - basic $0.00  $(0.03) $0.02  $(0.05)    
                     
Net income (loss) per share - diluted $0.00  $(0.03) $0.02  $(0.05)    
                     
Weighted average number of shares                    
outstanding - basic  468,521,746   385,487,654   449,898,509   267,016,937     
                     
Weighted average number of shares                    
outstanding - diluted  469,832,091   385,487,654   459,768,500   267,016,937     

The accompanying notes are an integral part of thesethe financial statementsstatements.
 
21

 
Power3 Medical Products, Inc.POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
(A Development Stage Entity)DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
Statement of Stockholders' Deficit  STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
 
           Period 
            From 
            May 18, 
   Three Months  Six Months  2004 to 
   Ended June 30,  Ended June 30,  June 30, 
   2011  2010  2011  2010  2011 
                
Net revenue $  $  $  $  $542,249 
                     
Operating expenses:                    
Employee compensation and benefits  31,250   36,789   62,500   71,707   31,629,342 
Professional and consulting fees  53,517   679,562   436,278   986,514   18,106,926 
Impairment loss              13,371,776 
Other selling general and administrative  24,094      86,080   162,848   2,740,228 
Total operating expenses  108,861   716,351   584,858   1,221,069   65,848,272 
Loss from operations  (108,861)  (716,351)  (584,858)  (1,221,069)  (65,306,023)
                     
                     
Other income (expense):                    
Derivative gain(loss)  197,757   (123,340)  950,568   10,580,355   7,923,572 
Loss on litigation settlement           -   (267,865)
Interest income           -   7,867 
Gain (loss) on debt settlement  (60,381)     (80,644)  -   1,502,228 
Interest expense  (21,906)  (23,528)  (43,796)  (60,206)  (5,831,022)
Mandatory prepayment penalty              (420,000)
Other expense              (194,886)
Total other income (expense)  115,470   (146,868)  826,128   10,520,149   2,719,894 
                     
Net income (loss)  6,609   (863,219)  241,270   9,299,080   (62,586,129)
Deemed dividend              (1,140,760)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $6,609  $(863,219) $241,270  $9,229,080  $(63,726,889)
                     
Net income (loss)                    
per share - basic $(0.00) $(0.00) $(0.00) $(0.02)    
                     
Net income (loss)                    
per share - diluted $(0.00) $(0.00) $(0.00) $(0.02)    
                     
Weighted average shares outstanding                    
Basic  517,476,361   442,685,225   502,080,160   440,432,559     
                     
Diluted  517,476,361   442,685,225   504,517,715   459,652,702     
              Additional       
  Common Stock  Preferred Stock  Paid-in  Other Equity  Accumulated 
  Shares  Par Value  Shares  Par Value  Capital  Items (1)  Deficit  Total 
Balances as of Beginning of                        
Development Stage -- May 18, 2004  14,407,630   14,407   3,870,000   3,870   14,225,974   -   (11,681,500)  2,562,751 
                               - 
Issued shares for compensation  27,945,000   27,945   -   -   25,423,555   (25,451,500)  -   - 
Issued shares for services  4,910,000   4,910   -   -   4,850,090   (535,000)  -   4,320,000 
Issued shares for acquisition                                
of equipment  15,000,000   15,000   -   -   13,485,000   -   -   13,500,000 
Stock option expense  -   -   -   -   626,100   (626,100)  -   - 
Issued shares for cash  242,167   242   -   -   314,575   -   -   314,817 
Cancelled shares per                                
cancellation agreement  (160,000)  (160)  -   -   (71,840)  -   -   (72,000)
Issued shares to convert Series A perferred shares to common shares
  3,000,324   3,001   (3,870,000)  (3,870)  3,377,974   -   (3,380,975)  (3,870)
Stock based compensation  -   -   -   -   -   8,311,012   -   8,311,012 
Net reclassification of                                
derivative liabilities  -   -   -   -   (3,347,077)  -   -   (3,347,077)
Net loss (from May 18, 2004 to                                
December 31, 2004)  -   -   -   -   -   -   (15,236,339)  (15,236,339)
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2004  65,345,121   65,345   -   -   58,884,351   (18,301,588)  (30,298,814)  10,349,294 
                                 
Cancelled shares returned                                
from employee  (1,120,000)  (1,120)  -   -   (1,307,855)  -   -   (1,308,975)
Issued shares for compensation  140,000   140   -   -   41,860   -   -   42,000 
Issued shares for services  850,000   850   -   -   155,150   -   -   156,000 
Amortize deferred                                
compensation expense  -   -   -   -   -   13,222,517   -   13,222,517 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (27,134,865)  (27,134,865)
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2005  65,215,121   65,215   -   -   57,773,506   (5,079,071)  (57,433,679)  (4,674,029)
                                 
Issued shares for services  2,449,990   2,449   -   -   311,865   -   -   314,314 
Issued shares for cash  2,452,746   2,452   -   -   222,548   -   -   225,000 
Issued shares for compensation  1,253,098   1,254   -   -   176,763   -   -   178,017 
Adoption of FAS 123R  -   -   -   -   (475,324)  475,324   -   - 
Amortize deferred compensation expense  -   -   -   -   -   4,603,747   -   4,603,747 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (6,415,969)  (6,415,969)
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2006  71,370,955   71,370   -   -   58,009,358   -   (63,849,648)  (5,768,920)
                                 
Issued shares for services  1,810,000   1,810   -   -   282,390   -   -   284,200 
Issued shares for conversion of debt  22,265,224   22,264   -   -   606,412   -   -   628,676 
Issued shares for warrants exercised  5,270,832   5,272   -   -   336,396   -   -   341,668 
Issued shares for cash  7,630,625   7,632   -   -   992,818   -   -   1,000,450 
Placement agent fees  -   -   -   -   (58,500)  -   -   (58,500)
Stock received  -   -   -   -   100   -   -   100 
Unreturned shares  5,000   5   -   -   4,495   -   -   4,500 
Deemed dividend  -   -   -   -   17,635   -   (17,635)  - 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (5,216,288)  (5,216,288)
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2007  108,352,636   108,353   -   -   60,191,104   -   (69,083,571)  (8,784,114)
                                 
Common stock issued for services  7,482,910   7,483   -   -   584,858   -   -   592,341 
Common stock issued for cash  7,492,875   7,493   -   -   639,911   -   -   647,404 
Common stock issued for                                
conversion of debt  22,172,536   22,173   -   -   1,568,626   -   -   1,590,799 
Common stock issued for lawsuit settlement
  325,000   325   -   -   30,550   -   -   30,875 
Issued shares for payables  2,133,333   2,133   -   -   186,867   -   -   189,000 
Common stock held in escrow  2,000,000   2,000   -   -   18,000   (20,000)  -   - 
Preferred stock issued for services  -   -   1,500,000   1,500   357,000   -   -   358,500 
Deemed dividends  -   -   -   -   12,071   -   (12,071)  - 
Loss on related party debt                                
conversion  -   -   -   -   (89,049)  -   -   (89,049)
Common stock payable  -   -   -   -   -   123,286   -   123,286 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (136,784)  (136,784)
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2008  149,959,290   149,960   1,500,000   1,500   63,499,938   103,286   (69,232,426)  (5,477,742)
                                 
Common stock issued for                                
conversion of debt  150,701,039   150,701   -   -   2,154,621   (82,944)  -   2,222,378 
Common stock payable  -   -   -   -   -   116,000   -   116,000 
Common stock issed upon exercise of warrants
  11,789,509   11,790   -   -   267,042   -   -   278,832 
Common stock issued for services  112,201,562   112,201   -   -   4,403,503   (14,286)  -   4,501,418 
Common stock issued for cash  11,515,600   11,516   -   -   73,640   -   -   85,156 
Return of common stock held in escrow
  (800,000)  (800)  -   -   800   -   -   - 
Deemed dividends          -   -   1,111,054   -   (1,111,054)  - 
Release of common stock held in escrow
          -   -   20,000   4,000   -   24,000 
Common stock rescinded for debt  (1,200,000)  (1,200)  -   -       (7,056)  -   (8,256)
Common stock contributed for debt payment
  -   -   -   -   276,558   -   -   276,558 
Options issued for services  -   -   -   -   176,927   -   -   176,927 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   -   (19,211,574)  (19,211,574)
                                 
Balance at December 31, 2009  434,167,000   434,167   1,500,000   1,500   71,984,083   119,000   (89,555,054)  (17,016,304)
                                 
Common stock issued upon exercise of warrants
  36,799,358   36,799   -   -   197,735   -   -   234,534 
Common stock issued for services  12,573,456   12,573   -   -   495,671   -   -   508,244 
Vesting of common stock issued for services
  -   -   -   -   210,000   -   -   210,000 
Common stock rescinded or canceled  (12,302,249)  (12,302)  -   -   12,302   -   -   - 
Net income  -   -   -   -   -   -   10,253,189   10,253,189 
                                 
Balance at September 30, 2010  471,237,565  $471,237  $1,500,000  $1,500  $72,899,791  $119,000  $(79,301,865) $(5,810,337)
(1) A more detailed description of the items comprising "Other Equity Items" is set forth herein following this Statement of Stockholders' Deficit.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
3

Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Entity)
 Statements of Stockholders Deficit -- Other Equity Items (Unaudited)
  Deferred Compensation Expense  
Treasury
Stock
  Stock Held in Escrow  Common Stock Payable  Total 
                
Balances as of beginning of development stage             
      May 18, 2004  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Issued shares for compensation  (25,451,500)  -   -   -   (25,451,500)
Issued shares for services  (535,000)  -   -   -   (535,000)
Stock option expense  (626,100)  -   -   -   (626,100)
Stock based compensation  8,311,012   -   -   -   8,311,012 
                     
Balance at December 31, 2004  (18,301,588)  -   -   -   (18,301,588)
                     
Amortize deferred compensation expense  13,222,517   -   -   -   13,222,517 
                     
Balance at December 31, 2005  (5,079,071)  -   -   -   (5,079,071)
                     
Adoption of FAS 123R  475,324   -   -   -   475,324 
Amortize deferred compensation expense  4,603,747   -   -   -   4,603,747 
                     
Balance at December 31, 2006  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
                     
Balance at December 31, 2007  -   -   -   -   - 
                     
Stock held in escrow  -   -   (20,000)  -   (20,000)
Common stock payable  -   -   -   123,286   123,286 
                     
Balance at December 31, 2008  -   -   (20,000)  123,286   103,286 
                     
Common stock issued for conversion of debt  -   7,056   -   (90,000)  (82,944)
Common stock payable  -   -   -   116,000   116,000 
Common stock issued for services  -   -   -   (14,286)  (14,286)
Return of common stock held in escrow  -   (16,000)  16,000   -   - 
Release of common stock held in escrow  -   -   4,000   -   4,000 
Common stock rescinded for debt  -   (7,056)  -   -   (7,056)
                     
Balance at December 31, 2009  -   (16,000)  -   135,000   119,000 
                     
                     
Balance at September 30, 2010 $-  $(16,000) $-  $135,000  $119,000 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of thesethe financial statements
statements.
 
42

Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
 (A Development Stage Entity)
 Statements of Cash Flows
        Period From 
        May 18, 2004 
     Through 
   For the Nine Months Ended  September 
   September 30,   30, 
  2010  2009  2010 
        (unaudited) 
          
Cash flows from operating activities         
          
Net income (loss) $10,253,189  $(12,235,770) $(63,098,632)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash            
   used in operating activities:            
       (Gain) loss on conversion of financial instruments  -   1,090,628   (1,579,670)
       Impairment of goodwill  -   -   13,371,776 
       Impairment of intangible assets  -   -   179,788 
       Loss on previously capitalized lease  -   -   34,243 
       Amortization of debt discounts and deferred finance costs  21,621   234,021   4,005,435 
       Change in derivative liability, net of bifurcation  (11,999,066)  9,368,581   (4,822,217)
       Stock issued for compensation and services  718,245   947,679   38,883,262 
       Debt issued for compensation and services  -   -   1,028,927 
       Stock issued for settlement of lawsuit  -   -   30,875 
       Depreciation expense  764   12,008   108,346 
       Release of stock held in escrow  -   24,000   24,000 
       Other non-cash items  -   -   (34,933)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:            
       Prepaid expenses and other current assets  -   (1,431)  186,084 
       Deposits and other assets  (6,332)  (254)  17,265 
       Accounts payable and other liabilities  716,889   413,256   4,097,563 
             
               Net cash used in operating activities  (294,690)  (147,282)  (7,567,888)
             
Cash flows from investing activities            
             
Increase in property and equipment  (2,325)  (52,500)  (144,833)
Increase in other assets  -   -   (179,786)
             
               Net cash used in investing activities  (2,325)  (52,500)  (324,619)
             
Cash flows from financing activities            
             
Proceeds from sale of common stock  -   85,156   2,349,327 
Borrowings on notes payable – related party  -   20,000   95,376 
Borrowings on notes payable  68,800   50,000   3,907,230 
Principal payments on notes payable – related party  -   -   (47,300)
Principal payments on notes payable  -   -   (122,478)
Proceeds from exercise of warrants  234,534   -   513,366 
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt, warrants,            
       and rights net of issuance cost  -   74,666   1,200,709 
             
               Net cash provided by financing activities  303,334   229,822   7,896,230 
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash and equivalents  6,319   30,040   3,723 
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period  -   8,331   2,596 
             
Cash and equivalents, end of period $6,319  $38,371  $6,319 
             
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information            
             
Cash paid for interest  -   -   59,840 
Cash paid for income taxes  -   -   - 
             
Schedule of non-cash financing activities            
             
Stock for conversion of debt – related party  -   1,047,794   2,227,759 
Stock for subscriptions receivable  -   -   - 
Warrants exercised for subscriptions receivable  -   4,166   - 
Stock issued for common stock payable  -   112,286   - 
Exchange of debt – related party  -   -   214,075 
Exchange of convertible notes for stock  -   -   2,525,070 
Stock issued for services and settlement of payables  718,245   -   1,496,919 
Deemed dividend  -   47,115   1,140,760 
Exchange of convertible preferred stock for common stock  -   -   3,380,975 
Preferred stock issued for payables  -   -   358,500 
Stock held in escrow  -   -   20,000 
Stock contributed for debt payment  -   276,558   276,558 
Return of stock held in escrow  -   16,800   16,800 
Cashless exercise of warrants  32,374   133   32,507 
Stock rescinded for debt  -   8,256   8,256 
Stock rescinded or canceled  12,302   -   12,302 
 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these  financial statements
5

 
POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)

  Six Months  Period From 
   Ended June 30,  May 18, 2004 to 
   2011  2010  June 30, 2011 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:         
Net income (loss) $241,270  $9,299,080  $(62,586,129)
             
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:            
             
Imputed interest  4,309      4,309 
Depreciation  232   683   108,694 
Stock for services  394,479   461,032   39,371,740 
Change in derivative liability, net of bifurcation  (950,568)  (10,580,355)  (6,769,671)
(Gain) loss on conversion of financial instruments         (1,579,670)
Impairment of goodwill        13,371,776 
Impairment of intangible assets        179,788 
Loss on previously capitalized lease        34,243 
Loss on settlement of litigation and debt  80,644      385,273 
Amortization of debt discount and deferred finance costs        4,.005,435 
Debt issued for compensation and services        1,028,927 
Stock for settlement of  litigation and debt        30,875 
Release of stock held in escrow        24,000 
Other non-cash items        (33,512)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:            
Prepaid expense and other current assets        186,084 
Deposits and other assets     (6,332)  17,265 
Accounts payable and other liabilities  (155,183)  572,152   4,486,233 
             
Net cash used in operating activities  (74,451)  (231,993)  (7,734,340)
             
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:            
Increase in property and equipment        (144,833)
Increase in other assets        (179,786)
             
Net cash used in investing activities        (324,619)
             
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:            
Proceeds from sale of common stock  3,000      2,352,327 
Borrowings on notes payable-related party  71,451      321,309 
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt         1,200,709 
Borrowings on notes payable        3,838,430 
Principal payments on notes payable        (122,478)
Principal payments –notes payable-related parties        (47,300)
Proceeds from exercise of warrants     234,534   513,366 
             
Net cash provided by financing activities  74,451   234,534   8,056,363 
             
Net increase (decrease) in cash     2,541   (2,596)
Cash at beginning of period        2,596 
Cash at end of period $  $  $ 
3

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information         
          
Cash paid for interest  -   -   59,840 
             
Cash paid for income tax  -   -   - 
             
Non-cash activities            
             
Stock for conversion of debt – related party  -   -   2,227,759 
Stock issued for common stock payable  -   98,207   - 
Exchange of debt – related party  -   -   214,075 
Exchange of convertible notes for stock  -   -   2,525,070 
Stock issued for settlement of litigation and debt  336,571   -   1,115,245 
Deemed dividend  -   -   1,140,760 
Exchange of convertible preferred stock for common stock  -   -   3,380,975 
Preferred stock issued for payables  -   -   358,500 
Stock held in escrow  -   -   20,000 
Stock contributed for debt payment  -   -   276,558 
Return of stock held in escrow  -   -   16,800 
Cashless exercise of warrants  -   32,374   32,507 
Stock rescinded for debt  -   -   8,256 
Stock rescinded or canceled  4,000   12,302   16,302 
Settlement of derivative liability  78,490   -   78,490 
4


Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A Development Stage Entity)Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
SeptemberJune 30, 2010
2011

Note 1.  Description of Business

Power3 Medical Products, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Florida as “Sheffield“Sheffeld Acres, Inc.” on May 15, 1992,7, 1993.  In February 1995, the Company merged with, and merged into a New York corporation namedchanged its name to, “Surgical Safety Products, Inc.” in 1994., a New York corporation.  On September 12,11, 2003, Surgical Safety Products, Inc.the Company amended its Certificate of Incorporation to change its name to “Power3 Medical Products, Inc.”  The Company became a development stage company on May 18, 2004, when it completed the acquisition of certain intellectual property assets from Advanced Bio/Chem, Inc. and began focusing on research and development relating to those assets.  The Company currently focuses on the development of its intellectual properties by focusing on disease diagnosis, protein and biomarker identification and early detection indicators in the areas of cancers, neurodegenerative and neuromuscular diseases, as well as other scientific areas of interest associated with protein biomarkers.

The Company has developed a portfolio of products including BC-SeraPro, a proteomic blood serum test for the early detection of breast cancer, and NuroPro®, a serum test for the detection of neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and ALS diseases.  These products are designed to analyze proteins and their mutations to assess an individual’s risk for developing disease later in life or a patient’s likelihood of responding to a particular drug, assess a patient’s risk of disease progression and disease recurrence, and measure a patient’s exposure to drug therapy to ensure optimal dosing and reduced drug toxicity. Future products and services are expected to originate from the Company’s internal research and development programs, collaborative efforts and alliances with third parties, and acquisitions of complementary technologies and businesses.  The Company intends to continue entering into collaboration and licensing agreements with biotechnology companies, academic and research institutions, and other organizations that have the ability to market and sell the Company’s products in return for licensing fees, royalties and milestone payments.

Note 2.  Basis of Presentation and Going Concern

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and in conformity with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X and the related rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the disclosures included in these financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

65


POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A Development Stage Entity)Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
SeptemberJune 30, 2010
2011

Note 2.  Basis of Presentation and Going Concern (Continued)

The unaudited financial statements included in this document have been prepared on the same basis as the annual financial statements and in management’s opinion, reflect all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 20092010 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.  The results of operations for the three-three and nine-six month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that the Company will have for any subsequent quarter or full fiscal year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Certain amounts in the financial statements for 20092010 have been reclassified to conform to the 20102011 presentation.  These reclassifications did not result in any change to the previously reported total assets, net loss or stockholders’ deficit.

As of SeptemberJune 30, 2010,2011, the Company’s significant accounting policies and estimates, and applicable recent accounting policies, which are detailed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009,2010, have not changed materially.

Going Concern

The Company’s financial statements have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.  The Company has historically incurred significant losses, which raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

7

POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
(A Development Stage Entity)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2010

Note 3.  Net Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic income (loss) per share is based on the weighted averageweighted-average number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding during the applicable period, and is calculated by dividing the reported net income (loss) for the applicable period by the weighted averageweighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the applicable period.  The Company calculates diluted income (loss) per share by dividing the reported net income (loss) for the applicable period by the weighted averageweighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the applicable period as adjusted to give effect to the exercise of all potentially dilutive warrantssecurities outstanding at the end of the period.

6


Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A total of 70,947,707Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
For the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 37,323,899 shares of common stock underlying warrants that2010, all potentially dilutive securities were outstanding on September 30, 2010 have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 because the exercise price was greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock during these periods.  A total of 2,000,000 and 35,623,808 shares of common stock underlying warrants that were outstanding on September 30, 2010 have been included in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 because thetheir exercise price was less than the average market price of the Company’s common stock during these periods.  Application of the treasury stock method resulted in dilution of 2,000,000 and 35,623,808 shares of common stock for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010, but had no effect on net income per share.that period.

All of the 122,827,446 shares of common stock underlying warrants that were outstanding on September 30, 2009, have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 because they are anti-dilutive.  As a result, basic loss per share was equal to diluted loss per share for the three- and nine- month periods ended September 30, 2009.
8

POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
(A Development Stage Entity)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2010
Note 4.  Property and Equipment

Property and equipment consisted of the following at SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 and December 31, 2009:2010:

Asset
 
September 30,
2010
  
December 31, 2009
  
June 30,
2011
  
December 31, 
2010
 
            
Computers and Related Devices $18,209  $15,884  $18,209  $18,209 
Less: Accumulated Depreciation  (15,964)  (15,201)  (16,313)  (16,081)
Total  2,244   683   1,896   2,128 
                
Lab Equipment  92,380   92,380   92,380   92,380 
Less: Accumulated Depreciation  (92,380)  (92,380)  (92,380)  (92,380)
Total  -0-   -0-   -0-   -0- 
                
Total Property and Equipment, Net $2,244  $683  $1,896  $2,128 

Note 5.  Other Current Liabilities

Other current liabilities consisted of the following at SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 and December 31, 2009:2010:

 
Liability
 
September 30,
2010
  December 31, 2009 
Accrued interest and interest payable $386,471  $312,252 
Accrued payroll taxes  23,183   21,464 
Accrued compensation and salaries payable  348,831   258,364 
Other accrued expenses and liabilities  1,811   1,811 
       Total $760,296  $593,891 
Liability 
June 30, 
2011
  
December 31, 
2010
 
Accrued Interest $403,394  $382,759 
Accrued Payroll Taxes  23,574   23,574 
Accrued Compensation and Salaries  442,581   380,081 
Other Accrued Expenses and Liabilities  172,308   1,811 
         
Total $1,041,857  $788,225 

97


POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A Development Stage Entity)Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
SeptemberJune 30, 2010
2011

Note 6.  Derivative Liabilities

TheAs described more fully in Note 2.  Significant Accounting Policies – Derivative Financial Instruments of the notes to the Company’s derivative liabilities were $2,457,358 and $14,456,424 at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.  The Company recognized gains of $1,418,710 and $11,999,065 for derivative liabilitiesaudited financials statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the three- and nine- month periodsyear ended September 30, 2010, respectively, compared to losses of $9,211,930 and $9,368,581 for derivative liabilities for the three- and nine- month periods ended September 30, 2009, respectively.  The derivative gains recognized during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 were due primarily to a decrease of the Company’s stock price during 2010.

The components of derivative financial instruments on the Company’s balance sheet at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:

  September 30, 2010  December 31, 2009 
       
Common stock warrants $1,484,232  $10,267,167 
Embedded conversion features – convertible promissory notes and debentures  973,126   4,189,257 
          Total $2,457,358  $14,456,424 
During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company changed the method by which it valued the conversion features in its convertible notes and convertible debentures by switching from the binomial lattice valuation model to the Black-Scholes pricing model.  Asmodel during the three months ended June 30, 2010.

In March 2011, the Company entered into a result,settlement agreement with Rockmore Investment Master Fund LTD (“Rockmore”) pursuant to which the conversion featuresCompany agreed to issue 12 million shares of its common stock to Rockmore in full payment of the outstanding balance of the debenture in the amount of $31,677 and accrued interest thereon, and for a full release from all claims filed by Rockmore against the Company.  The Company recorded a contingent loss in the amount of $169,818 in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 in accordance with the provisions of ASC 450.  The Company recognized a reduction in derivative liability of $78,490 which resulted in a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital.

The Company’s derivative liabilities were $431,414 and $1,460,472 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.  The Company recognized gains of $197,757 for derivative liabilities during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and losses of $123,340 for derivative liabilities during the three months ended June 30, 2010.  The Company recognized gains of $950,568 for derivative liabilities during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and recognized gains of $10,580,355 for derivative liabilities during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

The derivative gains recognized during these periods were due primarily to the decrease in the Company’s convertible notes were valued understock price during 2011 and 2010, respectively.

The components of derivative financial instruments on the binomial lattice valuation modelCompany’s balance sheet at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2009, and were valued under the Black-Scholes pricing model at September 30, 2010.  This change has been deemed by the Company to be a change in accounting estimate.2010 are as follows:

  June 30, 2011  
December 31, 
2010
 
       
Common Stock Warrants $155,624  $513,028 
Convertible Promissory Notes and Debentures  275,790   947,444 
         
Total $431,414  $1,460,472 

108


POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A Development Stage Entity)Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
SeptemberJune 30, 2010
2011
 
Under the Black-Scholes pricing model, the Company used the following weighted-average assumptions to determine the fair value of its notes, debentures and warrants:

  
Dividend
Yield
  
Expected
Volatility
  
Risk-Free
Interest Rate
  
Remaining
Contractual 
Life (Years)
 
Common Stock Warrants  0%  114.6%  0.03%  1.81 
Convertible Promissory Notes and Debentures  0%  122.4%  0.19%  4.75 

Note 7.  Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

In September 2008, the Company entered into an Arbitration Agreement with Steven Rash, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer, in connection with his agreement to resign as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.  The parties agreed to arbitrate claims for wages and other compensation due, breach of contracts or covenants, and benefits.  The Company agreed to arbitrate Mr. Rash’s claims for wages of $36,031 and itsother compensation due, breach of contracts or covenants, and benefits, and the Company’s claims for embezzlement, fraud and breach of contract by Mr. Rash.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2010,2011, arbitration had not been initiated by either party. Theparty and, as of that date, the Company doesdid not believe a material loss is probable atin connection with this time.matter.

In March 2009, McLennon Law Corporation filed a law suitlawsuit against the Company in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Francisco for breach of contract for approximately $117,000 of accrued but unpaid attorney fees.fees and accrued interest thereon.  In July 2010, a judgment was entered against usthe Company for the full amounta total of $148,683 for unpaid attorney fees and interest, andall of which was accrued in the law suit was terminated.Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010.  As of June 30, 2011, the Company did not intend to appeal the court’s ruling.

In September 2009, Marion McCormick, one of the Company’s former non-executive employees, attempted to convertfiled a lawsuit against the Company in the District Court for Montgomery County, Texas, 9th Judicial District, seeking damages and specific performance under a $30,000 convertible promissory note plus interestand a warrant exercisable into 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock.  The Company is disputing the amount, if any, that is due to the former employee under the note.  As of September 30, 2010, the note had not been converted.  In December 2009, the former employee filed a law suit against the Company seeking damages and specific performance.  In August 2010, the Company filed an amended answer and counterclaims against the former employee for breach of fiduciary duty and fraud.   The Company doesis disputing the amount, if any, that is due to the former employee under the note.  As of June 30, 2011, the Company did not believe a material loss is probable atas a result of this time.litigation.

9


Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
In February 2010, Transgenomic, Inc. (“Transgenomic”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.  The lawsuit containedcontains claims for fraud, breach of contract, libel and slander, and sought a declaration of rights under thea Collaboration and Exclusive License Agreement, dated January 23, 2009, between the parties.parties that the Company had terminated on February 2, 2010.  In April 2010, the Company filed a partial motion to dismiss Transgenomic’s fraud claim.  In June 2010, the Company filed a lawsuit against Transgenomic in the District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, 359th Judicial District.  The lawsuit contained claims for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, misappropriation, conversion, unjust enrichment, quantum meruit and promissory estoppel as well as a request for injunctive relief.  In July 2010, the Company filed a non-suit to dismiss the case that wethe Company filed against Transgenomic in Texas without prejudice.  As of September 30, 2010, theThe Company intendedintends to re-file the claims against Transgenomic in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska as counterclaims accompanying its response to the claims filed by Transgenomic. TheTransgenomic and has agreed to enter mediation with Transgenomic in an attempt to resolve this matter.  Mediation occurred in July 2011 between the parties and is currently awaiting the courts final approval.  Based on the July 22, 2011 mediation outcome with Transgenomic, the Company doesrecorded a loss of $55,556 during the three month period ended June 30, 2011 and recorded a stock payable of $55,556 which represented 5,555,556 shares.  As of August 22, 2011, these shares have not believe a material loss is probable at this time.
11

POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
(A Development Stage Entity)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2010
Note 7.  Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)yet been issued.

In March 2010, Rockmore Investment Master Fund LTD (“Rockmore”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the Supreme Court for the State of New York.  The lawsuit contained claims for breach of contract and specific performance related to a convertible debenture in the amount of $31,677 and common stock warrant previously issued by the Company to Rockmore.  In September 2010, Rockmore filed a motion for summary judgment and injunction regarding its claims.claims, and in October 2010, the Company filed an opposition to Rockmore’s motion.  In October 2010, the court granted Rockmore’s motion for summary judgment, but denied its request for an injunction.  In March 2011, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Rockmore pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue 12 million shares of its common stock to Rockmore in full payment of the outstanding balance of the debenture and accrued interest thereon, and for a full release from all claims filed by Rockmore against the Company.  The Company does not believerecorded a materialcontingent loss is probable at this time.in the amount of $169,818 in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 450, “Contingencies” (“ASC 450”). During the six month period ended June 30, 2011 the Company issued the 12,000,000 shares due Rockmore from the settlement.

10


Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
In April 2010, the Company filed a lawsuit against Richard Kraniak (“Kraniak”) and Roger Kazanowski (“Kraniak and Kazanowski”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.  The lawsuit contained claims for violations of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  In May 2010, Kraniak and Kazanowski filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit.  In June 2010, the Company filed a response to Kraniak and Kazanowski’s motion to dismiss as well as a first amended complaint against Kraniak and Kazanowski.  In October 2010, the Company filed a second amended complaint against Kraniak and Kazanowski, which it revised and re-filed in November 2010.  As of June 30, 2011, the Company did not believe a material loss is probable as a result of this litigation.

In July 2010, Kraniak and Kazanowski filed counterclaims against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.  The counterclaims contained claims for breach of contract, misrepresentation, civil conspiracy and defamation.  In July 2010, the Company filed an answer to the counterclaims denying each of the alleged claims.  TheIn December 2010, the Company doesfiled motions for partial summary judgment with respect to each of the counterclaims filed by Kraniak and Kazanowski.  As of June 30, 2011, the Company did not believe a material loss is probable atas a result of this time.litigation.

In April 2010, Neogenomics, Inc. (“Neogenomics”) filed a lawsuit and motion for summary judgment against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York.  The lawsuit contained claims offor breach of contract and specific performance related to athe convertible debenture previouslyin the amount of $200,000 issued by the Company to Neogenomics.Neogenomics in April 2007.  In May 2010, the Company filed a response to theNeogenomic’s motion for summary judgment.  TheIn December 2010, the court granted Neogenomic’s motion for summary judgment, awarding Neogenomics $217,457, comprised of $200,000 of principal under the debenture and $17,457 of accrued interest thereon.  As of June 30, 2011, the Company does not believe a material loss is probable at this time.intended to appeal the court’s ruling.

In April 2010, Lucas Associates, Inc. (“Lucas Associates”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, 359th Judicial District.  The lawsuit contained claims for breach of contract, quantum meruit and fraud related to allegations that the Company failed to pay themLucas Associates a finder’s fee in connection with the hiring of John Ginzler as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer in 2009.  In June 2010, the Company filed a general denial to the claims alleged in the complaint.  TheIn November 2010, the Company does not believeentered into a material loss is probable at this time.
12

POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
(A Development Stage Entity)
Notessettlement with Lucas Associates pursuant to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2010which the Company agreed to pay $20,000 to Lucas Associates in monthly installments of $1,250 beginning January 14, 2011.
Note 7.  Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)

In April 2010, John Ginzler, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer, filed a lawsuit against the Company in the District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, 359th Judicial District.  The lawsuit contained claims for breach of contract related to compensation owed to him under an employment agreement entered into between him and the Company.  In June 2010, the Company filed a general denial to the claims alleged in the complaint.  AsIn February 2011, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with John Ginzler pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue 12,285,714 shares of September 30, 2010,its common stock to him in full payment of all amounts owed to him under the case was pending.employment agreement and for a full release from all claims filed by him against the Company. The Company does not believerecorded a materialcontingent loss is probable at this time.in the amount of $161,044 in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 in accordance with the provisions of ASC 450. During the six month period ended June 30, 2011 the Company issued the 12,285,714 shares due Mr. Ginzler as a result of the settlement agreement.

11


Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
In May 2010, the Company filed a lawsuit against Able Income Fund LLC (“Able Income Fund”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.  The lawsuit contained claims for violations of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.  The Company subsequently moved for a default judgment on its claims due to Able Income Fund’s failure to timely respond to the Company’s lawsuit.  In November 2010, the Company’s motion for a default judgment was denied by the court.  As of June 30, 2011, the Company did not believe a material loss is probable as a result of this litigation.

In July 2010, Able Income Fund filed a lawsuit against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York.  The lawsuit contained claims for breach of contract and specific performance related to two convertible debentures in the aggregate amount of $450,000 previously issued by the Company to Able Income Fund.  In September 2010, the Company filed a motion to dismiss Able Income Fund’s lawsuit.  TheIn November 2010, Able Income Fund filed an amended complaint alleging the existence of an outstanding convertible debenture in the amount of $72,176.  As of June 30, 2011, the Company doesdid not believe a material loss is probable at this time.as a result of the litigation.

12


Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011

Employment and Consulting Agreements

On June 1, 2009, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Consulting Agreement with Bronco Technology, Inc. (the “Bronco Consulting Agreement”).  Under the terms of the agreement, Ms. Park agreed to continue to serve as the Company’s Interim Chief Executive Officer until May 31, 2011.  Under verbal agreement Ms. Park continues in the position as the Company’s Interim Chief Executive until a final written agreement is completed.  In consideration for Ms. Park’s services, the Company agreed to pay Bronco Technology, Inc. $8,334 per month, subject to annual review by the Company’s board of directors or compensation committee of the board of directors, if any.  The Company also agreed to pay Bronco Technology a cash commission payment of an amount equal to one percent, (1.0%), but not to exceed $5,000 per month, of the royalties received by the Company from the sale of certain of its products through license agreements signed during the term of the consulting agreement.

Effective May 17, 2009, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Dr. Ira L. Goldknopf (the “Goldknopf Employment Agreement”) to continue serving as the Company’s President and Chief Scientific Officer.  The agreement is for a three-year term.term of three years.  The Company agreed to pay Dr. Goldknopf an annual base salary of $100,000 through May 31, 2009, and an annual base salary of $125,000 for the remainder of the term, subject to annual review by the Company’s board of directors or compensation committee of the board of directors, if any.

Operating Leases

In May 2010, the Company entered into a commercial lease for its corporate headquarters located in The Woodlands, Texas pursuant to which the Company leases approximately 1,500 square feet of space for a fixed monthly rent payment of $2,500.  The Company also agreedwill be required to pay Mr. Goldknopfmake annual rent payments of $30,000 and $15,000 during 2011 and 2012, respectively.  The lease expires on June 30, 2012.

In June 2010, the Company entered into a cash bonuscommercial lease for its laboratory facilities located in The Woodlands, Texas pursuant to which the Company leases approximately 3,000 square feet of $1,000space for each publication authored or co-authored by Dr. Goldknopfan initial monthly rent payment of $5,587.  The Company will be required to make annual rent payments of $68,532, $71,514, $73,008, $74,496 and published in a scientific or professional journal that provides value to the Company.  $37,992 during 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively.  The lease expires on June 30, 2015.

13


POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A Development Stage Entity)Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
SeptemberJune 30, 2010
2011

Note 8.  Common Stock and Preferred Stock

The Company’s authorized capital consisted of 600,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, at SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 and December 31, 2009,2010, respectively, and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value per share, at September 30, 2010June 31, 2011 and December 31, 2009,2010, respectively.  There were 471,237,565524,778,730 and 434,167,000472,237,565 shares of common stock outstanding at SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 and December 31, 2009,2010, respectively, and 1,500,000 shares of preferred stock outstanding at SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 and December 31, 2009,2010, respectively.

In January 2010,Shares Issued in Capital-Raising Transactions

A summary of the shares of common stock issued by the Company issued 409,906in capital-raising transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2011 is provided below.

In February 2011, the Company sold 300,000 shares of common stock and Class A warrants exercisable into 300,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor for aggregate gross proceeds of $3,000.  The Class A warrants have an exercise price of $0.025 per share, are exercisable during the period commencing on the date of grant and ending December 31, 2011, and expire at the end of the exercise period.
Shares Issued for Services
A summary of the shares of common stock issued by the Company for services during the six months ended June 30, 2011 is provided below.

In January 2011, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an accredited investor pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue 3,166,667 shares of common stock to the consultant for consulting services.and to compensate the consultant $5,000 per month payable in cash or common stock in the Company’s discretion.  The shares were valued at the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the consultant agreed to receiveissuance of shares was approved by the sharesCompany’s board of directors for total consideration of $65,175,$69,667, all of which was recognized as expense during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.

14


Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
In January and February 2010,2011, the Company issuedentered into a total of 4,425,166consulting agreement with an accredited investor pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue 3,000,000 shares of common stock to accredited investors upon the exercise of outstanding warrants for aggregate gross proceeds of $234,534.

In March 2010,consultant, to pay $8,650 to the Company issued 500,000 shares ofconsultant in cash or common stock in the Company’s discretion immediately upon execution of the agreement, and to acompensate the consultant for consulting services.$5,000 per month payable in cash or common stock in the Company’s discretion.  The shares were valued at the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the consultant agreed to receiveissuance of shares was approved by the sharesCompany’s board of directors for total consideration of $23,750,$76,456, all of which was recognized as expense during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.

In January 2011, the Company and a consultant mutually agreed to terminate a consulting agreement that the parties had entered into in December 2009.  Pursuant to the terms of the consulting agreement, the Company had issued a restricted stock award for 6,000,000 shares of common stock.  Upon termination of the consulting agreement, the restricted stock award terminated automatically by its terms.  On the date of termination, 2,000,000 shares of common stock had vested.  The remaining 4,000,000 shares that had not yet vested were cancelled in their entirety.

In March 2010,2011, the Company issued 197,4903,461,539 shares of common stock to a consultant for consulting services.in full payment of outstanding fees payable in the amount of $28,199 performed during the three months ended March 31, 2011.  The shares were valued at the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the consultant agreed to receiveissuance of shares was approved by the sharesCompany’s board of directors for total consideration of $9,282,$48,462.  The Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt in the amount of $20,263, all of which was recognized as expense during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.

In April 2010,March 2011, the Company issued 400,000a total of 10,820,132 shares of common stock to a consultantvarious consultants as payment for services performed during the three months ended March 31, 2011 in accordance with the terms of the consultants’ respective consulting services.agreements.  The shares were valued at the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the consultant agreed to receiveissuance of shares was approved by the sharesCompany’s board of directors for total consideration of $16,000,$158,551, all of which was recognized as expense during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.
  
14

POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
(A Development Stage Entity)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
SeptemberDuring the three month period ended June 30, 2010

Note 8.  Common Stock and Preferred Stock (Continued)

In May 2010,2011, the Company issued a total of 32,374,1929,577,113 shares of common stock to accredited investors upon the exercise of outstanding warrants.  The warrants were exercisedvarious consultants as payment for services performed during that period in accordance with cashless exercise provisions contained in the warrants.  As a result,terms of the consultants’ respective consulting agreements. The shares were valued at the closing price of the Company received no proceeds froms common stock on the exercisedate the issuance of the warrants.

In May 2010,shares was approved by the Companys board of directors for total consideration of $91,594, all of which was recognized as expense during the three months ended June 30, 2011. The Company also issued 7,625,8081,930,000 shares of common stock to consultantsa consultant in full payment of outstanding fees payable of $19,300 for consulting services.services provided in a prior period. The shares were valued at the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the consultants agreed to receiveissuance of shares was approved by the sharesCompany’s board of directors for total consideration of $305,032,$24,125. The Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt in the amount of $4,825, all of which was recognized as expense during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

In August 2010, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for consulting services.  The shares were valued at the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the consultant agreed to receive the shares for total consideration of $28,000, all of which was recognized as expense during the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010.2011.
Shares Issued in Settlement of Litigation

In August 2010,February 2011, the Company issued 440,252entered into a settlement agreement with John Ginzler pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue 12,285,714 shares of its common stock to him in full payment of all amounts owed to him under the employment agreement and for a consultant for consulting services.  The shares were valued atfull release from all claims filed by him against the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the consultant agreed to receive the shares for total consideration of $11,006, all of which was recognized as expense during the three months ended September 30, 2010.

In September 2010, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for consulting services.  The shares were valued at the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the consultant agreed to receive the shares for total consideration of $50,000, all of which was recognized as expense during the three months ended September 30, 2010.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company rescinded and canceled a total of 12,302,249 shares of common stock that had been issued under restricted stock awards that had terminated in accordance with the terms of the awards.
15

POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
(A Development Stage Entity)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2010

Note 9.  Stock Options and Warrants

Company.  The Company did not issue any stock options or warrants duringrecorded a contingent loss in the three- and nine- month periodsamount of $161,044 in its financial statements for the year ended September 30, 2010, and no stock options were outstanding at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.  Warrants exercisable into a total of 72,947,707 and 131,323,437 shares of the Company’s common stock were outstanding on September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.  The weighted average exercise price of the warrants outstanding on September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $0.05.  The Company estimates the fair value of its warrants on the date of grant by using the Black-Scholes pricing model in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718.  Under the Black-Scholes pricing model,450.

In March 2011, the Company used the following weighted-average assumptionsentered into a settlement agreement with Rockmore pursuant to determine the fair value of the warrants issued: a dividend yield of zero percent, a historical volatility of 265%, a risk-free interest rate of 0.5% and a remaining contractual life of 2.11 years.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010,which the Company issued a totalagreed to issue 12 million shares of 36,799,358 shares ofits common stock to warrant holders upon the exercise of outstanding warrants for total cash proceeds of $234,534.  The average exercise priceRockmore in full payment of the warrants exercised was $0.005 per share.outstanding balance of the debenture and accrued interest thereon, and for a full release from all claims filed by Rockmore against the Company.  The Company recorded a contingent loss in the amount of $169,818 in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 in accordance with the provisions of ASC 450.
In July 22, 2011, Transgenomic, Inc. and the Company entered into mediation in an attempt to resolve an existing lawsuit.  Based on the mediation outcome with Transgenomic, the Company recorded a loss of $55,556 during the three month period ended June 30, 2011 and recorded a stock payable of $55,556 which represented 5,555,556 shares.  As of August 22, 2011 these shares have not yet been issued.
15


Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011

Note 10.9.  Promissory Notes and Debentures

In March 2011, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Rockmore pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue 12 million shares of its common stock to Rockmore in full payment of the outstanding balance of the debenture and accrued interest thereon, and for a full release from all claims filed by Rockmore against the Company.  The Company recorded a contingent loss in the amount of $169,818 in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 in accordance with the provisions of ASC 450.  The Company recognized a reduction in derivative liability of $78,490 which resulted in a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital.

During the three- and nine-month periodssix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010,2011, Rozetta-Cell Life Sciences, Inc., a Nevada corporation that the Company is proposing to acquire (“Rozetta-Cell”), made loans to the Company for a total of $68,800.$71,451.  The loans are interest free and payable on demand.  The Company incurred $4,309 of imputed interest during the six months ended June 30, 2011 which resulted in an increase in additional paid-in capital since the interest is not payable.

The carrying values of the Company’s notes payable, net of unamortized discounts, amounted to $534,800$806,933 and $466,000$735,482 at SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 and December 31, 2009,2010, respectively, as follows.  follows:
 
 
September 30,
2010
  December 31, 2009  
June 30, 
2011
  
December 31, 
2010
 
            
Notes Payable $68,800  $-0-  $-0-  $-0- 
                
Notes Payable – in Default  451,000   451,000 
        
Notes Payable – Related Party  15,000   15,000   225,933   154,482 
                
Total Notes Payable, Net of Discount $534,800  $466,000 
Notes Payable – in Default  501,000   501,000 
Less: Unamortized Discount  -0-   -0- 
Total  501,000   501,000 
        
Notes Payable – in Default – Related Party  80,000   80,000 
        
Total Notes Payable, Net $806,933  $735,482 

16


POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A Development Stage Entity)Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
SeptemberJune 30, 2010
2011
 
Note 10.  Promissory Notes and Debentures (Continued)

The carrying values of the Company’s convertible debentures, net of unamortized discounts, amounted to $431,255$272,176 and $409,634$303,853 at SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 and December 31, 2009,2010, respectively, as follows.follows:

  
September 30,
2010
  December 31, 2009 
       
Convertible Debentures $50,000  $50,000 
Less: Unamortized Discount  -0-   (21,621)
     Total  50,000   28,379 
         
Convertible Debentures – in Default  351,255   351,255 
         
Convertible Debentures – Related Party  30,000   30,000 
         
          Total Convertible Debentures, Net of
                Unamortized Discount
 $431,255  $409,634 
  
June 31, 
2011
  
December 31, 
2010
 
       
Convertible Debentures – in Default $272,176  $303,853 
         
Total Convertible Debentures, Net $272,176  $303,853 

Note 11. Acquisition of StemTroniX10.  Fair Value Measurements

In May 2010,The Company has issued several convertible promissory notes, convertible debentures and stock warrants that have conversion features that represent freestanding derivative instruments that meet the Company elected to terminaterequirements for liability classification under ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC 815”).  As a result, the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “StemTroniX Merger Agreement”) by and among the Company, Power3 Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiaryfair value of the Company,derivative financial instruments in these securities is reflected in the Company’s balance sheet as a liability.  The fair value of the derivative financial instruments in these securities was measured at the inception date of the securities and StemTroniX, Inc.,each subsequent balance sheet date.  Any changes in the fair value of the derivative financial instruments were recorded as non-operating, non-cash income or expense at each balance sheet date.

The following table presents the Company’s derivative liabilities within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value on a Texas corporation.  The Company did not incur any penalties in connection with its decision to terminate the StemTroniX Merger Agreement.recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
 
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Derivative liabilities – June 30, 2011  -0-   -0-  $431,414 
Derivative liabilities – December 31, 2010  -0-   -0-  $1,460,472 

The following table presents a Level 3 reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

  
Derivative 
Liabilities
 
Balance, December 31, 2009 $14,456,424 
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements (net)  (12,995,952)
Balance, December 31, 2010  1,460,472 
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements (net)  (1,029,058)
Balance, December 31, 2010 $431,414 

17


POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A Development Stage Entity)Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
SeptemberJune 30, 20102011
The Company’s other financial instruments consist of cash and equivalents, deposits, accounts payable, notes payable and convertible debentures.  The estimated fair value of the cash and equivalents, deposits and accounts payable approximates their respective carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of these instruments.  The estimated fair value of the notes payable and convertible debentures also approximates their respective carrying amounts since their terms are similar to those in the lending market for comparable loans with comparable risks.  None of these instruments are held for trading purposes.

Note 11.  2011 Equity Awards Plan

In February 2011, the Company adopted the Power3 Medical Products, Inc. 2011 Equity Awards Plan (the “2011 Equity Awards Plan”).  Under the plan, 25,000,000 shares of common stock may be granted to employees, officers and directors of, and consultants and advisors to, the Company under awards that may be made in the form of stock options, warrants, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted units, unrestricted stock and other equity-based or equity-related awards.  The plan terminates on February 28, 2021.  On February 28, 2011, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-172504, with the SEC covering the public sale of the 25,000,000 shares of common stock available for issuance under the plan.

Note 12.  Potential Acquisition of Rozetta-Cell

On September 7, 2010, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Rozetta-Cell Merger“Merger Agreement”) by and between the Company andwith Rozetta-Cell pursuant to which Rozetta-Cell will merge with and into the Company, the separate corporate existence of Rozetta-Cell will cease, and the Company will continue as the surviving company (the “Merger”).company.

Subject to the terms and conditions of the Rozetta-Cell Merger Agreement, which has been approved by the boards of directors of both the Company and Rozetta-Cell, if the Mergermerger is completed, each outstanding share of Rozetta-Cell common stock will be converted into the right to receive ten (10)10 shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to certain adjustments as provided in the Rozetta-Cell Merger Agreement.

The Rozetta-Cell Merger Agreement contains customary representations and warranties ofby the Company and Rozetta-Cell, covenants ofby Rozetta-Cell to conduct its business in the ordinary course until the Mergermerger is consummated, and covenants ofby Rozetta-Cell to not take certain actions until the Mergermerger is consummated.  Rozetta-Cell has also agreed to not solicit proposals relating to business combination transactions with other parties or enter into discussions concerning any proposals for business combination transactions with other parties.

18


Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
June 30, 2011
Consummation of the Mergermerger is subject to certain customary conditions, including, among others, the approval of the Mergermerger by the shareholders of Rozetta-Cell, the approval of the issuance of Companyshares of the Company’s common stock in connection with the Mergermerger by the shareholders of the Company, the approval of an amendment to the certification of incorporation of the Company by the shareholders of the Company to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance to that number of shares necessary to ensure that an adequate number of shares is available for issuance to the shareholders of Rozetta-Cell, the receipt of any required governmental approvals and expiration of applicable waiting periods, the accuracy of the representations and warranties ofby the Company and Rozetta-Cell (generally subject to a material adverse effect standard), and material compliance by the Company and Rozetta-Cell with their respective obligations under the Rozetta-Cell Merger Agreement.

The Rozetta-Cell Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights ofOn December 31, 2010, the Company and Rozetta-Cell including the rightentered into a First Amendment and Waiver to terminate the Rozetta-CellAgreement and Plan of Merger Agreement if(the “Amendment”) which amends the Merger is not completedAgreement.  Under the terms of the Amendment, the parties agreed to extend the outside date by December 31, 2010.which the merger must close to June 30, 2011 and require the conversion of all issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s Series B preferred stock into the Company’s common stock by the holders thereof subsequent to approval of the merger by the Company’s shareholders, but prior to completion of the merger.  The parties are currently finalizing a second amendment to extend the time requirement to complete the merger.
18

POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
(A Development Stage Entity)
Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)
September 30, 2010

Note 13.  Subsequent Events

Other than
Subsequent to June 30, 2011, the Company issued a total of 30,132,000 shares of common stock to consultants as set forth below,payment for services performed in accordance with the terms of the consultants’ respective consulting agreements.
In February 2010, Transgenomic, Inc. (“Transgenomic”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.  The lawsuit contains claims for fraud, breach of contract, libel and slander, and sought a declaration of rights under a Collaboration and Exclusive License Agreement, dated January 23, 2009, between the parties that the Company had terminated on February 2, 2010.  In April 2010, the Company filed a partial motion to dismiss Transgenomic’s fraud claim.  In June 2010, the Company filed a lawsuit against Transgenomic in the District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, 359th Judicial District.  The lawsuit contained claims for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, misappropriation, conversion, unjust enrichment, quantum meruit and promissory estoppel as well as a request for injunctive relief.  In July 2010, the Company filed a non-suit to dismiss the case that the Company filed against Transgenomic in Texas without prejudice.  The Company intends to re-file the claims against Transgenomic in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska as counterclaims accompanying its response to the claims filed by Transgenomic and has agreed to enter mediation with Transgenomic in an attempt to resolve this matter.  Mediation occurred in July 2011 between the parties and is currently awaiting the courts final approval.  Based on the July 22, 2011 mediation outcome with Transgenomic, the Company recorded a loss of $55,556 during the three month period ended June 30, 2011 and recorded a stock payable of $55,556 which represented 5,555,556 shares.  As of August 22, 2011 these shares have not yet been issued.
There have been no additional significant subsequent events occurred as ofthrough the date these financial statements were issued.

In October 2010, the court granted Rockmore’s motion for summary judgment, but denied its request for an injunction.

In October 2010, the Company filed a second amended complaint against Kraniak and Kazanowski.
In October 2010, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock to a consultant for consulting services.
 
19


DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).  All statements other than statements of historical facts included or incorporated by reference in this report, including, without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected revenue and costs, and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements.  In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” or “believes” or the negative thereof or any variation thereon or similar terminology or expressions.
 
These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from results proposed in such statements.  Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct.  Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to:

·our ability to fund future growth and implement our business strategy;
 
·our dependence on a limited number of business partners for substantially all of our revenue;
 
·projections of our future revenue, results of operations and financial condition;
 
·anticipated deployment, capabilities and uses of our products and our product development activities and product innovations;
 
·the importance of proteomics as a major focus of biology research;
 
·competition and consolidation in the markets in which we compete;
 
·existing and future collaborations and partnerships;
 
·the utility of biomarker discoveries;
 
·our belief that biomarker discoveries may have diagnostic and/or therapeutic utility;
 
·our ability to comply with applicable government regulations;
 
·our ability to expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio;
 
·the condition of the securities and capital markets;
 
·general economic and business conditions, either nationally or internationally or in the jurisdictions in which we are doing business;
 
and statements of assumption underlying any of the foregoing, as well as any other factors set forth herein under “Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” below and “Item 1A.  Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.2010 and subsequent Form 10-Q filings.  All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing.  Except as required by law, we assume no duty to update or revise our forward-looking statements.

20


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other parts of this report contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  All forward-looking statements included in this report are based on information available to us on the date hereof, and, except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.  Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 20092010 and elsewhere in this report.report and subsequent Form 10-Q filings.  The following should be read in conjunction with our financial statements beginning on page 1 of this report.
 
Overview
 
We are a leading bio-technology company focused on the development and marketing of novel diagnostic products through the analysis of proteins.  Our business is focused on the development of novel diagnostic tests in the fields of cancer and neurodegenerative diseases such as amytrophic lateral sclerosis (commonly known as ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease), Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease.  We also address clinical questions related to early disease detection, treatment response, monitoring of disease progression, prognosis and others through collaborations with leading academic and research institutions. We apply proprietary methodologies to discover and identify protein biomarkers associated with diseases.  We also use advanced protein separation methods to identify and resolve variants of specific biomarkers for developing a procedure to measure a property or concentration of an assay and commercializing novel diagnostic tests. By discovery and development of protein-based disease biomarkers, we have developed tools for diagnosis, prognosis, early detection and identification of new target drugs in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases.

 We have developed a portfolio of products including BC-SeraPro, a proteomic blood serum test for the early detection of breast cancer for which we have completed Phase I clinical trials, and NuroPro®, a serum test for the detection of neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and ALS diseases for which we are currently engaged in Phase II clinical trials.  These products are designed to analyze proteins and their mutations to assess an individual’s risk for developing disease later in life or a patient’s likelihood of responding to a particular drug, assess a patient’s risk of disease progression and disease recurrence, and measure a patient’s exposure to drug therapy to ensure optimal dosing and reduced drug toxicity. Armed with this risk response assessment information, individuals can take action to prevent or delay the onset of disease and physicians can ensure that patients receive the most appropriate treatment for their disease.
 
Strategy

We are currently developing proteomic and related biomarker tests that will assist providers and payers in determining the most appropriate therapeutic intervention for a particular patient. These tests are developed based on our know-how and expertise, in partnership with thought leaders and leading healthcare institutions, and intellectual property that we have developed on our own, licensed from others, or acquired from other parties.  Our tests are available to patients by physician’s prescription to providers located primarily in the United States and may be performed in our laboratory or partnered with other test providers.

21


We intend to complete Phase II clinical trials for NuroPro® and begin commercialization of NuroPro® during 2011, and to complete Phase II clinical trials for BC-SeraPro during 2011.  We also intend to develop additional diagnostic products utilizing the proteomic research and results that we have achieved and for which we have filed patent applications with the United States Patent and Trademark Office.USPTO.  By utilizing the intellectual property that we have in our possession, building on the intellectual property portfolio through additional clinical trials, and acquiring complementary intellectual property from other bio-technology companies, we will have the ability to successfully create, market and sell a diverse diagnostic product offering based on our proteomic research.offering.

Our goal during the remainder of 2010 and 2011 is to enter into collaboration and licensing agreements with other leading bio-technology companies, academic and research institutions like the Baylor College of Medicine, whothat have the resources and expertise to engage in successful commercialization campaigns of our products.  Through these agreements, we will generate revenue through a combination of licensing fees, royalties and milestone payments that we receive from our collaboration and licensing partners.

Recent Developments

On September 7, 2010, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Rozetta-Cell Life Sciences, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Rozetta-Cell”), pursuant to which Rozetta-Cell will merge with and into us, the separate corporate existence of Rozetta-Cell will cease, and we will continue as the surviving company (the “Merger”).
Subject to the terms and conditions of the Merger Agreement, which has been approved by the boards of directors of both us and Rozetta-Cell, if the Merger is completed, each outstanding share of Rozetta-Cell common stock will be converted into the right to receive ten shares of our common stock, subject to certain adjustments as provided in the Merger Agreement.
The Merger Agreement contains customary representations and warranties of us and Rozetta-Cell, covenants of Rozetta-Cell to conduct its business in the ordinary course until the Merger is consummated, and covenants of Rozetta-Cell to not take certain actions until the Merger is consummated.  Rozetta-Cell has also agreed to not solicit proposals relating to business combination transactions with other parties or enter into discussions concerning any proposals for business combination transactions with other parties.
Consummation of the Merger is subject to certain customary conditions, including, among others, the approval of the Merger by the shareholders of Rozetta-Cell, the approval of the issuance of Power3 common stock in connection with the Merger by the shareholders of Power3, the approval of an amendment to the certification of incorporation of Power3 by the shareholders of Power3 to increase the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance to that number of shares necessary to ensure that an adequate number of shares is available for issuance to the shareholders of Rozetta-Cell, the receipt of any required governmental approvals and expiration of applicable waiting periods, the accuracy of the representations and warranties of Power3 and Rozetta-Cell (generally subject to a material adverse effect standard), and material compliance by Power3 and Rozetta-Cell with their respective obligations under the Merger Agreement.
22

The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights of Power3 and Rozetta-Cell, including the right to terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger is not completed by December 31, 2010.
Outlook

We expect sales of our BC-SeraProBC-SeraPro™ and NuroPro®NuroPro® diagnostic products to increase during 2011 as we complete Phase II clinical studies on these products.  We also expectintend to developcontinue developing several additional diagnostic products during 2011.  As a result, we expect revenue to increase as we enter into additional collaboration and licensing agreements with other bio-technology companies, academic and research institutions and governmental agencies.  We intend to reduce our liabilities by retiring our outstanding debt, which will decrease substantially, if not eliminate, the derivative liabilities that we have been incurring for the past few years.  The combination of increased revenue and reduced debt, coupled with significant capital-raising initiatives that we plan to complete during the remainder of 2010 and 2011, will provide us with the assets and operating results necessary to grow at an exponential rate for the foreseeable future.

Critical Accounting Policies

For information regarding our critical accounting policies, please refer to the discussion provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 20092010 under the caption “Item 6.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies” and our Notes to Financial Statements included therein.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For information regarding recent accounting pronouncements applicable to our business, please refer to the discussion provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 20092010 under the caption “Item 6.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Recent Accounting Pronouncements” and our Notes to Financial Statements included therein.

22


Comparison of the Three-Month Periods Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 and 20092010

Net Revenue

Net revenue consists primarilyhas historically consisted of licensing fees, royalties and milestone payments that we receivereceived from our licensing partners.  We generated revenue of $41,337 for the three months ended September 30, 2009.  We did not generate any revenue forduring the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010.  The decrease in revenue resulted primarily from our decision to terminate the Collaboration2011 and Exclusive License Agreement with Transgenomic, Inc. in January 2010.  We expect licensing fees, royalties and milestone payments generated from our BC-SeraPro and NuroPro® diagnostic productsintend to increase during 2010 as we complete Phase II clinical studies on these products.  As a result, we expect revenue to increase as we enter into additional collaboration and licensing agreements with other bio-technology companies, academic and research institutions and governmental agencies.
23

agencies during 2011.  As a result, we expect to begin to generate revenue, if such licenses are completed, from either licensing fees, royalties or milestone payments.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses consist primarily of employee compensation and benefits, professional and consulting fees, and other selling, general and administrative expenses.

Employee Compensation and Benefits.  Employee compensation and benefits consists of all salaries and other cash compensation, equity-based compensation, employee benefits and the related payroll taxes.  Employee compensation expense decreased $84,282$5,539 to $33,147$31,250 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 from $117,429$36,789 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009.2010.  The decrease of $84,282$5,539 was due primarily to a decrease in the amount of $65,172 for salary and equity-based compensation expenses associated with a decrease inthat we paid to the number of individuals whoindividual we employed during the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010.  We2011.  Assuming the completion of our merger with Rozetta-Cell and adequate funding, we expect employee compensation expense to increase overin the next 12 monthsfuture as we continueattempt to retain additional executive management personnel, lab technicians and other employees in connection with the growth of our business.

Professional Fees.  Professional fees consist of fees paid to our independent accountants, lawyers, laboratory and technology consultants and other professionals and consultants.  Professional fees increased $272,387decreased $626,045 to $654,920$53,517 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 from $382,533$679,562 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009.2010.  The increasedecrease of $272,387$626,045 was due primarily to increasesa decrease in legal, accounting and other professional fees associated with various legal matters and litigation activities that the Company was involved in during 2010 as compared to a significant reduction in these activities during the quarter ended June 30, 2011.  Assuming the completion of $120,274 for legal feesour merger with Rozetta-Cell and $149,794 for the amount of expense recognized in connection with equity-based compensation paid to service providers and consultants for various services. Weadequate funding, we expect professional fees to increase overin the next 12 monthsfuture as we incur additional legal, accounting, laboratory and technology fees in connection with the general expansion of our business and operations.

Other Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.  Other selling, general and administrative expenses consist of selling and marketing expenses, lab services and supplies, clinical validation studies, computer hardware and system costs, bank service charges, filing fees and dues, non-employee customer service representative expense, rent expense, financial printer costs, transfer agent costs, the costs of investor relations campaigns and activities, postage and delivery expenses, severance expenses, general business expenses and miscellaneous general and administrative expenses.  Other general and administrative expenses increased $29,275$24,094 to $95,028$24,094 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 from $65,753$-0- for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009.2010.  The increase of $29,275 resulted$24,094 was due primarily from an increaseto a reclassification of $14,993expenses to provide enhanced reporting information for relocation expensesthe three month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in the prior year.   Assuming the completion of our merger with Rozetta-Cell and increases in other miscellaneous selling, general and administrative expenses.  Weadequate funding, we expect other general and administrative expenses to increase overin the future as we continue to incur expenses for clinical validation studies, lab supplies, selling and marketing expenses, rent, computer hardware and systems, and other miscellaneous items associated with the general operation and growth of our business.

23


Comparison of the Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

Net Revenue

Net revenue has historically consisted of licensing fees, royalties and milestone payments that we received from our licensing partners.  We did not generate any revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.  We intend to enter into collaboration and licensing agreements with bio-technology companies, academic and research institutions and governmental agencies during 2011.  As a result, we expect to begin to generate revenue during the next 12 months as we begin to generate licensing fees, royalties and milestone payments under these new agreements.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses consist primarily of employee compensation and benefits, professional and consulting fees, and other selling, general and administrative expenses.

Employee Compensation and Benefits.  Employee compensation and benefits consists of all salaries and other cash compensation, equity-based compensation, employee benefits and the related payroll taxes.  Employee compensation expense decreased $9,207 to $62,500 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $71,707 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  The decrease of $9,207 was due to a decrease in the amount of salary and equity-based compensation that we paid to the individual we employed during the six months ended June 30, 2011.  Assuming the completion of our merger with Rozetta-Cell and adequate funding, we expect employee compensation expense to increase in the future we attempt to retain additional executive management personnel, lab technicians and other employees in connection with the growth of our business.

Professional Fees.  Professional fees consist of fees paid to our independent accountants, lawyers, laboratory and technology consultants and other professionals and consultants.  Professional fees decreased $550,236 to $436,278 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $986,514 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  The decrease of $550,236 was due primarily to a decrease in legal, accounting and other professional fees associated with various legal matters and litigation activities that the Company was involved in during 2010 as compared to a significant reduction in these activities during the six month period ended June 30, 2011.  Assuming the completion of our merger with Rozetta-Cell and adequate funding, we expect professional fees to increase in the future as we incur additional legal, accounting, laboratory and technology fees in connection with the general expansion of our business and operations.

24


Other Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.  Other selling, general and administrative expenses consist of selling and marketing expenses, lab services and supplies, clinical validation studies, computer hardware and system costs, bank service charges, filing fees and dues, non-employee customer service representative expense, rent expense, financial printer costs, transfer agent costs, the costs of investor relations campaigns and activities, postage and delivery expenses, severance expenses, general business expenses and miscellaneous general and administrative expenses.  Other general and administrative expenses decreased $76,768 to $86,080 for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 from $162,848 for the same period in the prior year.  The decrease of $76,768 was due primarily to a decrease in general corporate activities while the company focuses on the merger with Rozetta-Cell and due to limited resources.  Assuming the completion of our merger with Rozetta-Cell and adequate funding, we expect other general and administrative expenses to increase in the future as we continue to incur expenses for clinical validation studies, lab supplies, selling and marketing expenses, rent, computer hardware and systems, and other miscellaneous items associated with the general operation and growth of our business.

Interest Expense

Interest expense consists of the interest and discount amortization costs that we incur on the debt obligations that we have.  Interest and amortization expense decreased $29,880 to $23,782 for the three months ended September 30, 2010 from $53,662 for the three months ended September 30, 2009.  The decrease of $29,880 was due primarily to the retirement during 2009 of many of the debt obligations that were outstanding during the three months ended September 30, 2009.  We expect interest expense to decrease over the next 12 months as we continue to retire our remaining debt obligations.
24


Derivative Gain / Loss

Derivative gain / loss consists of the non-operating, non-cash income or expense resultingthat results from changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments contained in the convertible promissory notes and associated stock warrants that were outstanding at SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 and 2009,2010, respectively.  During the three months ended June 30, 2010, we changed the method by which we valued the conversion features in ourits convertible notes and convertible debentures by switching from the binomial lattice valuation model to the Black-Scholes pricing model.

We recognized a derivative gain of $1,418,710$197,757 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 compared to a derivative loss of $9,211,930$123,340 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009.2010.  The differencederivative gains that we recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were due primarily to a decrease in the price of $10,630,640our common stock during 2011 and 2010, respectively.  The decrease of $321,097 was due primarily to the fact that our stock price dropped a smaller percentage amount during the three months ended June 30, 2011 than it did during the three months ended June 30, 2010, and was generally at a lower level during the three months ended June 30, 2011 than it was during the three months ended June 30, 2010.

We recognized a derivative gain of $950,568 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to a derivative gain of $10,580,355 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  The derivative gains that we recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were due primarily to a decrease in the trading price of our common stock during 2011 and 2010, respectively.  The decrease of $9,629,787 was due primarily to the fact that we experienced between July 1,our stock price dropped a smaller percentage amount during the six months ended June 30, 2011 than it did during the six months ended June 30, 2010, and Septemberwas generally at a lower level during the six months ended June 30, 2010 compared2011 than it was during the six months ended June 30, 2010.

While we expect our outstanding convertible promissory notes to continue to be retired or converted into shares of common stock during the large increasenext 12 months, we cannot predict what our future derivative gains or losses will be in the trading price of our common stock that we experienced between July 1, 2009future since such gains and September 30, 2009.  While future derivative gain / loss islosses are largely dependent upon the trading price of our common stock, we expect future derivative gains and losses to be smaller in amount as our convertible promissory notes are retired or converted into shares of common stock, and as the associated stock warrants are exercised or expire by their terms.stock.

25


Gain / Loss on Settlement of Debt

Gain / loss on settlement of debt consists of the gains and losses that we have recognized in connection with the retirement of outstanding debt and payment of outstanding invoices, and results when we issue shares of common stock having an aggregate value less than (in the case of gains) or greater than (in the case of losses) the outstanding principal amount of the applicable note and accrued interest thereon or the applicable invoice.  We recognized a loss on the settlement of debt of $82,599 for$60,381 during the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009.2011.  We did not recognize any gain or loss on the settlement of debt forduring the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010.  The difference of $82,599$60,381 was due primarily to our decision to pay off a significant amount of our outstanding debt obligations and accrued interest, and numerous outstanding invoices during 20092011 by issuing shares of our common stock having an aggregate value that was greater than the outstanding principal amount of the applicable note and accrued interest or the applicable invoice.invoices.  While we may continue to incur additional gains and losses on the settlement of debt in the future asin the event we continue to pay off additional outstanding debtdebts and invoices with shares of our common stock, we expect any such gains or losses to decrease as the amount of our outstanding debt continues to decrease.decreases.

Gain / loss on settlement of debt consists of the gains and losses that we recognized in connection with the retirement of outstanding debt and payment of outstanding invoices, and results when we issue shares of common stock having an aggregate value less than (in the case of gains) or greater than (in the case of losses) the outstanding principal amount of the applicable note and accrued interest thereon or the applicable invoice.  We recognized a loss on the settlement of debt of $80,644 during the six months ended June 30, 2011.  We did not recognize any gain or loss on the settlement of debt during the six months ended June 30, 2010.  The difference of $80,644 was due primarily to our decision to pay off outstanding invoices during 2011 by issuing shares of our common stock having an aggregate value that was greater than the outstanding amount of the invoices.  While we may incur additional gains and losses on the settlement of debt in the future in the event we pay off additional outstanding debts and invoices with shares of our common stock, we expect any such gains or losses to decrease as the amount of our outstanding debt decreases.

Interest Expense

Interest expense consists of the interest and discount amortization costs that we incur on the debt obligations that we have.  Interest and amortization expense decreased $1,622 to $21,906 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from $23,528 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.  The decrease of $1,622 was due primarily to our decision to retire certain of our debt obligations during 2010 that were outstanding during the three months ended June 30, 2010.  We expect interest expense to decrease over the next 12 months as we continue to retire our remaining debt obligations.

Interest and amortization expense decreased $16,410 to $43,796 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $60,206 for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  The decrease of $16,410 was due primarily to our decision to retire certain of our debt obligations during 2010 that were outstanding during the six months ended June 30, 2010.  We expect interest expense to decrease over the next 12 months as we continue to retire our remaining debt obligations.

26


Net Income / Loss

We generated net income of $611,833$6,609 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 compared to a net loss of $9,885,581$863,219 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009.2010.  The differenceincrease in net income of $10,497,414 was$869,828 for the three month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in the prior year.  This increase in net income is primarily due primarily to a differencesignificant decrease in operating expenses of $10,630,640$607,490 for derivative gain recognized during 2010the three month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared to derivative loss recognized during 2009,the same period in the prior year.  This decrease was primarily due to a difference of $82,599 resulting from losses from the extinguishment of debt recognized during 2009,reduction in legal and decreases of $29,880 for interest expense and $84,282 for employee compensation and benefits.  This was partially offset by an increase of $272,387 for professional fees.litigation activities in 2011 as compared to 2010.  We expect to generate net losses during the remainder of 20102011 as we continue to build our business.  However, we expect these losses to decrease in the future asif we can begin to generate additional revenue through collaboration and licensing partnersagreements and as we continue to retire our outstanding debt obligations.
 
25

Comparison of the Nine-Month Periods Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009

Net Revenue

We generated revenuenet income of $209,814$241,270 for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009.  We did not generate any revenue2011 compared to net income of $9,299,080 for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010.  The decrease in revenue resulted primarily from our decision to terminate the Collaboration and Exclusive License Agreement with Transgenomic, Inc. in January 2010.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses consist primarilynet income of employee compensation and benefits, professional and consulting fees, and other selling, general and administrative expenses.

Employee Compensation and Benefits.  Employee compensation expense decreased $279,938 to $113,785 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $393,723 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.  The decrease of $279,938$9,057,810 was due primarily to a decreasedecreases of approximately $202,065$9,629,787 for salary and equity-based compensation expenses associated with a decrease in the number of individuals who we employed during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

Professional Fees.  Professional fees increased $145,551 to $1,153,419 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $1,007,868 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.  The increase of $145,551 was due primarily to an increase of $188,530 for legal and accounting fees, partially offset by a decrease of $28,439 for the amount of expense recognized in connection with equity-based compensation paid to service providers and consultants for various services.

Other Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.  Other general and administrative expenses increased $178,397 to $394,684 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $216,287 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.  The increase of $178,397 resulted primarily from increases of $35,026 for administrative fees, $57,000 for general office expenses, $13,366 for lease payments and $16,168 for relocation expenses, and increases in other miscellaneous selling, general and administrative expenses.

Interest Expense

Interest and amortization expense decreased $284,509 to $83,988 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 from $368,497 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.  The decrease of $284,509 was due primarily to the retirement during 2009 of many of the debt obligations that were outstanding during the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
26


Derivative Gain / Loss

We recognized a derivative gain of $11,999,065 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to a derivative loss of $9,368,581 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.  The difference of $21,367,646 was due primarily to the decrease in the trading price of our common stock that we experienced between January 1, 2010 and September 30, 2010 compared to the large increase in the trading price of our common stock that we experienced between January 1, 2009 and September 30, 2009.

Gain / Loss on Settlement of Debt

We recognized a loss on the settlement of debt of $1,090,628 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.  We did not recognize any gain or loss on the settlement of debt for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.  The difference of $1,090,628 was due primarily to our decision to pay off a significant amount of our outstanding debt obligations and accrued interest, and numerous outstanding invoices, during 2009 by issuing shares of our common stock having an aggregate value that was greater than the outstanding principal amount of the applicable note and accrued interest or the applicable invoice.

Net Income / Loss

We generated net income of $10,253,189 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to a net loss of $12,282,885 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.  The difference of $22,536,074 was due primarily to a difference of $21,367,646 resulting from the derivative gain recognized during 20102011 compared to derivative gain recognized during 2010.  In addition we had a significant decrease in operating expenses of $639,211 for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the derivative loss recognizedsame period in the prior year.  This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in legal and litigation activities in 2011 as compared to 2010.  We expect to generate net losses during 2009, a difference of $1,090,628 resulting from2011 as we continue to build our business.  However, we expect these losses fromto decrease in the extinguishment offuture if we can begin to generate revenue through collaboration and licensing agreements and as we continue to retire our outstanding debt recognized during 2009, and decreases of $284,509 for interest expense and $279,938 for employee compensation and benefits.  This was partially offset by a decrease of $209,814 for net revenue.obligations.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since our inception, we have funded our operations primarily through private sales of equity securities and the use of short- and long-term debt.

Net cash used by operating activities was $294,690 for$74,451 during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 compared to $147,282 for$231,993 during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009.2010.  The $147,408 increase indecrease of $151,953 for cash used by operating activities was due primarily to a differencedecrease of $21,367,647$9,950,884 for changes in the amountderivative gain and an increase of our derivative liability, and decreases of $1,090,628 for loss on settlement of debt, $718,245$234,674 for stock issued for compensation and services, and $212,400 for amortization of debt discounts and deferred finance costs.  This was partially offset by a differencedecreases of $22,488,959 between the$9,962,175 for net income generated in 2010 and the net loss incurred during 2009.$71,416 for accounts payable and other liabilities.

NetWe did not have any cash used byflows from investing activities was $2,325 forduring the nine monthssix month periods ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010 compared to $52,500 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.  The difference of $50,175 was due to a decrease in the amount of property2011 and equipment purchased during 2010.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $303,334$74,451 for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 compared to $229,822$234,534 for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2009.2010.  The $73,512 increase$160,083 decrease in cash provided by financing activities was due primarily to an increasea decrease of $234,534 for proceeds from the exercise of warrants, partially offset by decreasesincreases of $85,156$71,451 for proceeds from the issuance of notes payable to related parties and $3,000 for proceeds from the sale of common stock and $74,666 for proceeds from the issuance of convertible debt and warrants.
27

stock.

Our primary sources of capital over the past 12 months are set forth below.

In September 2009, we issued 2,500,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor for total cash proceeds of $25,000.

In September 2009, we issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock to an accredited investor for total cash proceeds of $20,000.

In September 2009, we issued a convertible promissory note and a warrant to acquire shares of common stock to an accredited investor for consideration of $25,000.  The note is for a principal amount of $25,000, is convertible into 2,500,000 shares of common stock, has an interest rate of 8% and was due March 3, 2010.  The warrant is exercisable into 1,000,000 shares of common stock and has an exercise price of $0.01 that may be subject to adjustment depending upon the trading price of our common stock.

During the three months ended September 30,period beginning January 1, 2010 and ending May 12, 2011, Rozetta-Cell made loans to us for a total of $68,800.$251,433.  The loans are interest free and payable on demand.

27


During the period beginning January 1, 20092010 and ending September 30, 2010,May 12, 2011, we issued a total of 56,214,67536,799,358 shares of common stock to warrant holders upon the exercise of outstanding warrants at exercise prices ranging between $0.001$0.01 and $0.25$0.053 per share for total cash proceeds of $513,366.$234,534.

To date, our capital needs have been met primarily through the issuance of convertible promissory notes and debentures, sales of equity securities and proceeds received upon the exercise of warrants held by our security holders.  We do not currently maintain a line of credit or term loan with any commercial bank or other financial institution.  We have used the proceeds from the exercise of warrants and our private offerings of securities to pay virtually all of the costs and expenses we have incurred.  These costs and expenses were comprised of operating expenses, which consisted of the employee compensation expenses, professional fees and other general and administrative expenses discussed above.

We believe that our current cash resources will not be sufficient to sustain our operations for the next 12 months.  We will need to obtain additional cash resources within the next 12 months to enable us to pay our ongoing costs and expenses as they are incurred and finance the growth of our business.  We intend to obtain these funds through internally generated cash flows from operating activities, proceeds from the issuance of equity securities and proceeds from the exercise of outstanding warrants.  The issuance of additional equity would result in dilution to our existing shareholders.  We have not made arrangements to obtain additional financing and we can provide no assurance that additional financing will be available in an amount or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.  If we are unable to obtain additional funds when they are needed or if such funds cannot be obtained on terms favorable to us, we may be unable to execute upon our business plan or pay our costs and expenses as they are incurred, which could have a material, adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
 
28


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of SeptemberJune 30, 2010,2011, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partners, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, that had been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.  As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.

Item 4T.  Controls and Procedures.

As of SeptemberJune 30, 2010,2011, we carried out the evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures required by Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.  Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of SeptemberJune 30, 2010,2011, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is: (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

28


There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with this evaluation that occurred during our fiscal quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20102011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

29


PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings.

In September 2008, we entered into an Arbitration Agreement with Steven Rash, our former Chief Executive Officer, in connection with his agreement to resign as the Company’sour Chief Executive Officer.  The partiesWe agreed to arbitrate Mr. Rash’s claims for wages of $36,031 and other compensation due, breach of contracts or covenants, and benefits.  We agreed to arbitrate Mr. Rash’s claims for wages of $36,031benefits, and our claims for embezzlement, fraud and breach of contract by Mr. Rash.  Arbitration has not been initiated by either party.

In March 2009, McLennon Law Corporation (“McLennon”) filed a law suitlawsuit against us in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of San Francisco for breach of contract for approximately $117,000 of accrued but unpaid attorney fees plus interest.and accrued interest thereon.  In July 2010, a judgment was entered against us for the full amounta total of $148,683 for unpaid attorney fees and interest andinterest.  We do not intend to appeal the law suit was terminated.
29

court’s ruling.

In September 2009, Marion McCormick, one of our former non-executive employees, attempted to convertfiled a lawsuit against us in the District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, 9th Judicial District, seeking damages and specific performance under a $30,000 convertible promissory note plus interestand a warrant exercisable into 1,000,000 shares of our common stock.  In August 2010, we filed an amended answer and counterclaims against Ms. McCormick for breach of fiduciary duty and fraud.   We are disputing the amount, if any, that is due to the former employeeher under the note.  As of September 30, 2010, the note had not been converted.  In December 2009, the former employee filed a law suit against us in the District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, 9th Judicial District seeking damages and specific performance.  In August 2010, we filed an amended answer and counterclaims against the former employee for breach of fiduciary duty and fraud.

In February 2010, Transgenomic, Inc. (“Transgenomic”) filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.  The lawsuit contains claims for fraud, breach of contract, libel and slander, and seeks a declaration of rights under thea Collaboration and Exclusive License Agreement, dated January 23, 2009, between the parties.parties that we terminated on February 2, 2010.  In April 2010, we filed a partial motion to dismiss Transgenomic’s fraud claim, which was denied by the court in October 2010.claim.  In June 2010, we filed a lawsuit against Transgenomic in the District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, 359th Judicial District.  The lawsuit containscontained claims for trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, misappropriation, conversion, unjust enrichment, quantum meruit and promissory estoppel, as well as a request for injunctive relief. In July 2010, we filed a non-suitWe have agreed to dismiss the case without prejudice.  We intend to re-file the claims againstenter mediation with Transgenomic in an attempt to resolve this matter. Mediation occurred in July 2011 between the United States District Court forparties and is currently awaiting the Districtcourts final approval. Based on the July 22, 2011 mediation outcome with Transgenomic, the Company recorded a loss of Nebraska as counterclaims accompanying our response to$55,556 during the claims filed by Transgenomic.three month period ended June 30, 2011 and recorded a stock payable of $55,556 which represented 5,555,556 shares.  As of August 22, 2011 these shares have not yet been issued.
  
In March 2010, Rockmore Investment Master Fund LTD (“Rockmore”) filed a lawsuit against us in the Supreme Court for the State of New York.  The lawsuit containscontained claims for breach of contract and specific performance related to a convertible debenture in the amount of $31,677 and common stock warrant that we previously issued to Rockmore.  In September 2010, Rockmore filed a motion for summary judgment and injunction regarding its claims, and in October 2010, we filed an opposition to theirRockmore’s motion.  In October 2010, the court granted Rockmore’s motion for summary judgment, but denied its request for an injunction.  In March 2011, we entered into a settlement agreement with Rockmore pursuant to which we agreed to issue 12 million shares of our common stock to Rockmore in return for a full release from all claims filed by Rockmore against us.

30


In April 2010, we filed a lawsuit against Richard Kraniak (“Kraniak”) and Roger Kazanowski (“Kraniak and Kazanowski”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.  The lawsuit contains claims for violations of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).Act.  In May 2010, Kraniak and Kazanowski filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit.  In June 2010, we filed a response to Kraniak and Kazanowski’s motion to dismiss as well as a first amended complaint against Kraniak and Kazanowski.  In July 2010, Kraniak and Kazanowski filed counterclaims against us for breach of contract, misrepresentation, civil conspiracy and indefamation.  In July 2010, we filed an answer to the counterclaims denying each of the alleged claims.  In October 2010, we filed a second amended complaint against Kraniak and Kazanowski.Kazanowski, which we revised and re-filed in November 2010.  In JulyDecember 2010, we filed motions for partial summary judgment with respect to each of the counterclaims filed by Kraniak and Kazanowski, and in March 2011, filed counterclaims against the Company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.  The counterclaims contain claims for violations of securities laws, breach of contract, misrepresentation, civil conspiracy and defamation.  We filed an answersupplements to the counterclaims denying eachcertain of the alleged claims.motions for partial summary judgment.

In April 2010, Neogenomics, Inc. (“Neogenomics”) filed a lawsuit and motion for summary judgment against us in the Supreme Court of the State of New York.  The lawsuit containscontained claims for breach of contract and specific performance related to a convertible debenture in the amount of $200,000 that we previously issued to Neogenomics.Neogenomics in April 2007.  In May 2010, we filed a response to Neogenomic’s motion for summary judgment.  In December 2010, the court granted Neogenomic’s motion for summary judgment, awarding Neogenomics $217,457, comprised of $200,000 of principal under the debenture and $17,457 of accrued interest thereon.  We intend to appeal the court’s ruling.

30

In April 2010, Lucas Associates, Inc. (“Lucas Associates”) filed a lawsuit against us in the District Court of Montgomery County, Texas.Texas, 359th Judicial District.  The lawsuit containscontained claims for breach of contract, quantum meruit and fraud related to allegations that we failed to pay themLucas Associates a finder’s fee in connection with the hiring of John Ginzler as the Company’sour Chief Financial Officer in 2009.  In June 2010, we filed a general denial to the claims alleged in the complaint.  In November 2010, we entered into a settlement with Lucas Associates pursuant to which we agreed to pay $20,000 to Lucas Associates in monthly installments of $1,250 beginning January 14, 2011.

In April 2010, John Ginzler, our former Chief Financial Officer, filed a lawsuit against us in the District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, 359th Judicial District.  The lawsuit containscontained claims for breach of contract related to an employment agreement that we had entered into between him and the Company.with him.  In June 2010, the Companywe filed a general denial to the claims alleged in the complaint.  In February 2011, we entered into a settlement agreement with Mr. Ginzler pursuant to which we agreed to issue 12,285,714 shares of our common stock to him in return for a full release from all claims that he had filed against us.

In May 2010, we filed a lawsuit against Able Income Fund LLC (“Able Income Fund”) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division.  The lawsuit contains claims for violations of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.  We subsequently moved for a default judgment on our claims due to Able Income Fund’s failure to timely respond to our lawsuit.  In November 2010, the court denied our motion for a default judgment.  We have entered mediation with Able Income Fund in an attempt to resolve this matter.

31


In July 2010, Able Income Fund filed a lawsuit against us in the Supreme Court of the State of New York.  The lawsuit contains claims for breach of contract and specific performance related to two convertible debentures and common stock warrantsin the aggregate amount of $450,000 that we previously issued to Able Income Fund.  In September 2010, we filed a motion to dismiss Able Income Fund’s lawsuit.  In November 2010, Able Income Fund filed an amended complaint alleging the existence of an outstanding convertible debenture in the amount of $72,176.  We filed an answer with affirmative defenses to Able Income Fund’s amended complaint in March 2011.
 
Item  2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
 
During the threesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2010,2011, we sold the following securities without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”):
 
In August 2010, we issued 1,000,000February 2011, the Company sold 300,000 shares of common stock and Class A warrants exercisable into 300,000 shares of common stock to a consultantan accredited investor for consulting services.aggregate gross proceeds of $3,000.  The Class A warrants have an exercise price of $0.025 per share, are exercisable during the period commencing on the date of grant and ending December 31, 2011, and expire at the end of the exercise period.  These securities were issued to an accredited investor in a private placement transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act directly by us without engaging in any advertising or general solicitation of any kind and without payment of underwriting discounts or commissions to any person.

In August 2010, we issued 440,252February 2011, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with John Ginzler pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue 12,285,714 shares of its common stock to him in full payment of all amounts owed to him under the employment agreement and for a consultant for consulting services.full release from all claims filed by him against the Company.  These securities were issued to an accredited investor in a private placement transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act directly by us without engaging in any advertising or general solicitation of any kind and without payment of underwriting discounts or commissions to any person.

In September 2010, we issued 2,000,000March 2011, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Rockmore pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue 12 million shares of its common stock to Rockmore in full payment of the outstanding balance of the debenture and accrued interest thereon, and for a consultant for consulting services.full release from all claims filed by Rockmore against the Company.  These securities were issued to an accredited investor in a private placement transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act directly by us without engaging in any advertising or general solicitation of any kind and without payment of underwriting discounts or commissions to any person.

DuringIn March 2011, the Company issued 3,461,539 shares of common stock to a consultant in full payment of outstanding fees payable in the amount of $28,199 performed during the three months ended SeptemberMarch 31, 2011.  These securities were issued to an accredited investor in a private placement transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act directly by us without engaging in any advertising or general solicitation of any kind and without payment of underwriting discounts or commissions to any person.

During the three month period ended June 30, 2010,2011, the Company issued a total of 9,577,113 shares of common stock to various consultants as payment for services performed during that period in accordance with the terms of the consultants’ respective consulting agreements. The shares were valued at the closing price of the Companys common stock on the date the issuance of shares was approved by the Companys board of directors for total consideration of $91,594, all of which was recognized as expense during the three months ended June 30, 2011. The Company also issued 1,930,000 shares of common stock to a consultant in full payment of outstanding fees payable of $19,300 for services provided in a prior period. The shares were valued at the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date the issuance of shares was approved by the Company’s board of directors for total consideration of $24,125. The Company recorded a loss on settlement of debt in the amount of $4,825, all of which was recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2011.
32


During the six months ended June 30, 2011, Rozetta-Cell made loans to us for a total of $68,800.$71,451.  The loans are interest free and payable on demand.  These securities were issued to an accredited investor in a private placement transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act directly by us without engaging in any advertising or general solicitation of any kind and without payment of underwriting discounts or commissions to any person.

31


During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, we issued a total of 36,799,358 shares of common stock to warrant holders upon the exercise of outstanding warrants for total cash proceeds of $234,534.  These securities were issued to a limited number of accredited investors in private placement transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act directly by us without engaging in any advertising or general solicitation of any kind and without payment of underwriting discounts or commissions to any person.

Item 6.  Exhibits.

The following exhibits are included herein:
 
Exhibit No. Exhibit
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the registrant required by Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
   
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer of the registrant required by Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
   
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the registrant required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
 
3233


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 POWER3 MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
  
Date:  November 10, 2010  August 23, 2011/s/  Helen R. Park
 Helen R. Park
 Chief Executive Officer
 
33


EXHIBIT INDEX
 
ExhibitExhibit Description
31.1 
31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
  
31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
  
32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
 
34