UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


(Mark One)
 xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31,June 30, 2011
 
OR
 
 ¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from               to               
 
Commission File Number:  000-11486

 
CENTER BANCORP, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 
New Jersey52-1273725
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
(IRS Employer
Incorporation or Organization)
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)

2455 Morris Avenue
Union, New Jersey 07083-0007
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(908) 688-9500
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes   ¨x   No  ¨o Not applicable to the Registrant.
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”filer��, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (check one):
 
Large accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer ¨
(Do not check if smaller
reporting company)
Smaller reporting company ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
 
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 
Common Stock, no par value:
16,290,700 shares
(Title of Class)(Outstanding as of April 30,July 31, 2011)
 


 
 

 

Table of Contents
  Page
   
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION1
  
Item  1.Financial Statements   2
 Consolidated Statements of Condition at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (unaudited)2
 Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)3
 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)4
 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 and 2010 (unaudited)5
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements6
   
Item  2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations2930
   
Item  3.Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risks4549
   
Item  4.Controls and Procedures4650
   
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION 
  
Item  1.Legal Proceedings4650
   
Item 1A.Risk Factors4651
   
Item  6.Exhibits4751
   
SIGNATURES4852

 
i

 

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
The following unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X, and, accordingly, do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2011, or for any other interim period. The Center Bancorp, Inc. 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K, should be read in conjunction with these financial statements.

 
1

 

Item 1. Financial Statements
CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION
(Unaudited)

 June 30,  December 31, 
(in thousands, except for share data)
 
March 31,
2011
  
December 31,
2010
  2011  2010 
            
ASSETS            
Cash and due from banks $80,129  $37,497  $109,467  $37,497 
Investment securities  410,376   378,080 
Investment securities:        
Available for sale  377,214   378,080 
Held to maturity (fair value of $42,122 in 2011 and $0 in 2010)  41,804    
Loans  716,096   708,444   698,148   708,444 
Less: Allowance for loan losses  9,591   8,867   9,836   8,867 
Net loans  706,505   699,577   688,312   699,577 
Restricted investment in bank stocks, at cost  9,146   9,596   9,194   9,596 
Premises and equipment, net  12,747   12,937   12,578   12,937 
Accrued interest receivable  4,756   4,134   5,229   4,134 
Bank-owned life insurance  28,165   27,905   28,426   27,905 
Goodwill and other intangible assets  16,942   16,959   16,927   16,959 
Prepaid FDIC assessments  3,109   3,582   2,521   3,582 
Other assets  16,771   17,118   15,766   17,118 
Total assets $1,288,646  $1,207,385  $1,307,438  $1,207,385 
        
LIABILITIES                
Deposits:                
Non interest-bearing $154,910  $144,210  $158,689  $144,210 
Interest-bearing:                
Time deposits $100 and over  165,596   119,651   168,925   119,651 
Interest-bearing transaction, savings and time deposits $100 and less  614,140   596,471   638,062   596,471 
Total deposits  934,646   860,332   965,676   860,332 
Short-term borrowings  35,917   41,855   32,374   41,855 
Long-term borrowings  161,000   171,000   161,000   171,000 
Subordinated debentures  5,155   5,155   5,155   5,155 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  27,344   8,086   13,129   8,086 
Total liabilities  1,164,062   1,086,428   1,177,334   1,086,428 
        
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
Preferred stock, $1,000 liquidation value per share, authorized 5,000,000 shares; issued 10,000 shares  9,721   9,700   9,741   9,700 
Common stock, no par value, authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued 18,477,412 shares;
outstanding 16,290,700 shares at March 31, 2011 and 16,289,832 shares at December 31, 2010
  110,056   110,056 
Common stock, no par value, authorized 25,000,000 shares; issued 18,477,412 shares; outstanding 16,290,700 shares at June 30, 2011 and 16,289,832 shares at December 31, 2010  110,056   110,056 
Additional paid-in capital  4,949   4,941   4,960   4,941 
Retained earnings  24,015   21,633   26,963   21,633 
Treasury stock, at cost (2,186,712 common shares at March 31, 2011 and 2,187,580 common shares at December 31, 2010)  (17,691)  (17,698)
Treasury stock, at cost (2,186,712 common shares at June 30, 2011 and 2,187,580 common shares at December 31, 2010)  (17,691)  (17,698)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (6,466)  (7,675)  (3,925)  (7,675)
Total stockholders’ equity  124,584   120,957   130,104   120,957 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,288,646  $1,207,385  $1,307,438  $1,207,385 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 
2

 

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
 Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
  June 30,  June 30, 
(in thousands, except for share data) 2011  2010  2011  2010  2011  2010 
            
Interest income                  
Interest and fees on loans $9,217  $9,368  $8,950  $9,419  $18,167  $18,787 
Interest and dividends on investment securities:                        
Taxable interest  3,378   3,009 
Tax-exempt interest  88   117 
Taxable  3,428   2,864   6,806   5,873 
Tax-exempt  351   56   439   173 
Dividends  184   178   149   149   333   327 
Total interest income  12,867   12,672   12,878   12,488   25,745   25,160 
Interest expense                        
Interest on certificates of deposit $100 or more  265   414   348   340   613   754 
Interest on other deposits  1,002   1,264   1,072   1,235   2,074   2,499 
Interest on borrowings  1,655   2,485   1,665   2,256   3,320   4,741 
Total interest expense  2,922   4,163   3,085   3,831   6,007   7,994 
Net interest income  9,945   8,509   9,793   8,657   19,738   17,166 
Provision for loan losses  878   940   250   781   1,128   1,721 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  9,067   7,569   9,543   7,876   18,610   15,445 
Other income                        
Service charges, commissions and fees  449   430   461   459   910   889 
Annuities and insurance commissions  6   93   33   23   39   116 
Bank-owned life insurance  260   264   261   264   521   528 
Other  116   108   176   79   292   187 
Other-than-temporary impairment losses on investment securities  (95)  (7,767)  (142)  (705)  (237)  (8,472)
Portion of losses recognized in other comprehensive income, before taxes     3,377            3,377 
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses on investment securities  (95)  (4,390)  (142)  (705)  (237)  (5,095)
Net gains on sale of investment securities  861   1,046   943   1,362   1,804   2,408 
Net investment securities gains (losses)  766   (3,344)  801   657   1,567   (2,687)
Total other income (loss)  1,597   (2,449)
Total other income (charges)  1,732   1,482   3,329   (967)
Other expense                        
Salaries and employee benefits  2,867   2,657   2,903   2,727   5,770   5,384 
Occupancy and equipment  866   889   667   734   1,533   1,623 
FDIC insurance  528   618   528   458   1,056   1,076 
Professional and consulting  241   274   245   422   486   696 
Stationery and printing  101   84   99   90   200   174 
Marketing and advertising  21   93   65   105   86   197 
Computer expense  339   340   350   340   689   680 
Other real estate owned  (1)   
Other real estate owned, net     43   (1)  43 
Loss on fixed assets, net     (10)     437      427 
Repurchase agreement termination fee     594            594 
Other  973   853 
All other  900   912   1,873   1,766 
Total other expense  5,935   6,392   5,757   6,268   11,692   12,660 
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)  4,729   (1,272
Income before income tax expense (benefit)  5,518   3,090   10,247   1,818 
Income tax expense (benefit)  1,711   (1,553)  1,934   1,076   3,645   (477)
Net Income  3,018   281   3,584   2,014   6,602   2,295 
Preferred stock dividends and accretion  146   145   145   146   291   291 
Net income available to common stockholders $2,872  $136  $3,439  $1,868  $6,311  $2,004 
Earnings per common share                        
Basic $0.18  $0.01  $0.21  $0.13  $0.39  $0.14 
Diluted $0.18  $0.01  $0.21  $0.13  $0.39  $0.14 
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding                        
Basic  16,290,391   14,574,832   16,290,700   14,574,832   16,290,547   14,574,832 
Diluted  16,300,604   14,579,871   16,315,667   14,576,223   16,309,026   14,577,897 
Dividend paid per common share $0.03  $0.03  $0.06  $0.06 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 
3

 

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
 
                Accumulated    
       Additional        Other  Total 
 Preferred  Common  Paid In  Retained  Treasury  Comprehensive  Stockholders’ 
(in thousands, except for share data) 
Preferred
Stock
  
Common
Stock
  
Additional
Paid In
Capital
  
Retained
Earnings
  
Treasury
Stock
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
  
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
  Stock  Stock  Capital  Earnings  Stock  Loss  Equity 
                     
BalanceDecember 31, 2009
 $9,619  $97,908  $5,650  $17,068  $(17,720) $(10,776) $101,749  $9,619  $97,908  $5,650  $17,068  $(17,720) $(10,776) $101,749 
Comprehensive income:                                                        
Net income              281           281               2,295           2,295 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax                      3,087   3,087 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax                      4,441   4,441 
Total comprehensive income                          3,368                           6,736 
Accretion of discount on preferred stock  20           (20)             41           (41)           
Issuance cost of common stock              (3)          (3)
Cash dividends on preferred stock              (125)          (125)              (250)          (250)
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.03 per share)              (438)          (438)
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.06 per share)
              (875)          (875)
Restricted stock awarded (2,083 shares)          3       22       25           3       22       25 
Taxes related to stock-based compensation          8               8           8               8 
Stock-based compensation expense          16               16           29               29 
                                                        
Balance—March 31, 2010
 $9,639  $97,908  $5,677  $16,766  $(17,698) $(7,689) $104,603 
Balance—June 30, 2010
 $9,660  $97,908  $5,690  $18,194  $(17,698) $(6,335) $107,419 
                                                        
BalanceDecember 31, 2010
 $9,700  $110,056  $4,941  $21,633  $(17,698) $(7,675) $120,957  $9,700  $110,056  $4,941  $21,633  $(17,698) $(7,675 )  $120,957  
Comprehensive income:                                                        
Net income              3,018           3,018               6,602           6,602 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax                      1,209   1,209                       3,750   3,750 
Total comprehensive income                          4,227                           10,352 
Accretion of discount on preferred stock  21           (21)             41           (41)           
Issuance cost of common stock              (1)          (1)              (3)          (3)
Cash dividends on preferred stock              (125)          (125)              (250)          (250)
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.03 per share)              (489)          (489)
Stock issued for options exercise                  7       7 
Cash dividends declared on common stock ($0.06 per share)
              (978)          (978)
Stock issued for options exercise (868 shares)
                  7       7 
Stock-based compensation expense          8               8           19               19 
                                                        
Balance—March 31, 2011
 $9,721  $110,056  $4,949  $24,015  $(17,691) $(6,466) $124,584 
Balance—June 30, 2011
 $9,741  $110,056  $4,960  $26,963  $(17,691) $(3,925) $130,104 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 
4

 

CENTER BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
 Six Months Ended 
(in thousands) 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
  June 30, 
 2011  2010  2011  2010 
Cash flows from operating activities:            
Net income $3,018  $281  $6,602  $2,295 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:                
Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on investment securities, net  1,056   339   2,036   720 
Depreciation and amortization  241   312   484   592 
Stock-based compensation  8   16   19   29 
Provision for loan losses  878   940   1,128   1,721 
Provision for deferred taxes     193      193 
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses on investment securities  95   4,390   237   5,095 
Gains on sales of investment securities, net  (861)  (1,046)  (1,804)  (2,408)
Loans originated for resale  (2,449)     (2,827)  (1,540)
Proceeds from sale of loans held for sale  2,481      2,481   1,538 
Gains on sale of loans held for sale  (32)   
Net gain on sales and dispositions of premises and equipment     (10)
Increase in accrued interest receivable  (622)  (35)
(Gains) Loss on sale of loans held for sale  (32)  2 
Net loss on sales and dispositions of premises and equipment     427 
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable  (1,095)  195 
Decrease in prepaid FDIC insurance assessments  473   374   1,061   667 
Increase in cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance  (260)  (264)  (521)  (528)
Decrease in other assets  349   1,697   1,352   1,897 
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities  418   (960)
Decrease in other liabilities  (1,277)  (1,046)
Net cash provided by operating activities  4,793   6,227   7,844   9,849 
Cash flows from investing activities:                
Investment securities available-for-sale:                
Purchases  (109,956)  (153,302)  (213,875)  (347,921)
Sales  76,551   141,511   158,201   362,354 
Maturities, calls and principal repayments  20,867   16,663   30,180   25,110 
Net redemption of restricted investment in bank stocks  450   121 
Investment securities held-to-maturity:        
Purchases  (5,843)   
Net redemption (purchase) of restricted investment in bank stocks  402   (35)
Net decrease (increase) in loans  (7,797)  4,189   10,515   (2,838)
Purchases of premises and equipment  (35)  (59)  (93)  (171)
Increase in principal portion of lease  (9)   
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment     1      1 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities  (19,929)  9,124   (20,513)  36,500 
Cash flows from financing activities:                
Net increase (decrease) in deposits  74,314   (21,195)  105,344   (11,246)
Net decrease in short-term borrowings  (5,938)  (5,892  (9,481)  (3,447)
Repayments of long-term borrowings  (10,000)  (10,039)  (10,000)  (22,078)
Cash dividends on preferred stock  (125)  (125)  (250)  (250)
Cash dividends on common stock  (489)  (438)  (978)  (875)
Issuance cost of common stock  (1)     (3)  (3)
Issuance cost of restricted stock award     25      25 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  7      7    
Taxes related to stock based awards     8      8 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  57,768   (37,656)  84,639   (37,866)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents  42,632   (22,305)  71,970   8,483 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  37,497   89,168   37,497   89,168 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $80,129  $66,863  $109,467  $97,651 
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:                
Cash payments for:                
Interest paid on deposits and borrowings $3,006  $4,310  $6,037  $8,154 
Income taxes     40   2,564   379 
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing activities:                
Trade date accounting settlements for investments, net $17,892  $27,624  $3,761  $31,826 
Transfer of loan to other real estate owned $  $1,780 
Net investment in direct financing lease $  $3,700 
Transfer from investment securities available-for-sale to investment securities        
Held-to-maturity $35,987  $ 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 
5

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Note 1.  Basis of Presentation
 
The consolidated financial statements of Center Bancorp, Inc. (the “Parent Corporation”) are prepared on the accrual basis and include the accounts of the Parent Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Union Center National Bank (the “Bank” and, collectively with the Parent Corporation and the Parent Corporation’s other direct and indirect subsidiaries, the “Corporation”). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated from the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
 
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has made estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated statements of condition and that affect the results of operations for the periods presented. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, other-than-temporary impairment evaluation of securities, the evaluation of the impairment of goodwill and the valuation of deferred tax assets.
 
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).
 
Note 2.  Earnings per Common Share
 
Basic earnings per common share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS includes any additional common shares as if all potentially dilutive common shares were issued (e.g., stock options). The Corporation’s weighted- average common shares outstanding for diluted EPS include the effect of stock options and warrants outstanding using the Treasury Stock Method, which are not included in the calculation of basic EPS.
 
Earnings per common share have been computed based on the following:
 
 Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
 Three Months Ended March 31,  June 30,  June 30, 
(in thousands, except per share amounts) 2011  2010  2011  2010  2011  2010 
            
Net income $3,018  $281  $3,584  $2,014  $6,602  $2,295 
Preferred stock dividends and accretion  (146)  (145)  145   146   291   291 
Net income available to common shareholders $2,872  $136  $3,439  $1,868  $6,311  $2,004 
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding  16,290   14,575   16,291   14,575   16,291   14,575 
Plus: effect of dilutive options and warrants  11   5   25   1   18   3 
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding  16,301   14,580   16,316   14,576   16,309   14,578 
Earning per common share:                        
Basic $0.18  $0.01  $0.21  $0.13  $0.39  $0.14 
Diluted $0.18  $0.01  $0.21  $0.13  $0.39  $0.14 
 
Note 3.  Stock-Based Compensation
 
The Corporation maintains two stock-based compensation plans from which new grants could be issued. The Corporation’s stock option plans permit Parent Corporation common stock to be issued to key employees and directors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. The options granted under the plans are intended to be either
incentive stock options or non-qualified options. Under the 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, a total of 394,417 shares are available for issuance. Under the 2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan, a total of 431,003 shares remain available for grant under the plan as of March 31,June 30, 2011 and are authorized for issuance. Such shares may be treasury shares, newly issued shares or a combination thereof.
 
Options have been granted to purchase common stock principally at the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant. Options are exercisable over a three year vesting period starting one year after the date of grant and generally expire ten years from the date of grant.
 
Stock-based compensation expense for all share-based payment awards granted after December 31, 2005 is based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of FASB ASC 718-10-10. The Corporation recognizes these compensation costs net of a forfeiture rate and recognizes the compensation costs for only those shares expected to vest on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the option vesting term of 3 years. The Corporation estimated the forfeiture rate based on its historical experience during the preceding seven fiscal years.

 
6

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Note 3.  Stock-Based Compensation—(continued)
 
For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, the Corporation’s income before income taxes and net income were reduced by $8,000$19,000 and $5,000,$11,000, respectively, as a result of the compensation expense related to stock options. For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2010, the Corporation’s income before income taxes and net income were reduced by $16,000$29,000 and $10,000,$17,000, respectively, as a result of the compensation expense related to stock options.
 
Under the principal option plans, the Corporation may also grant restricted stock awards to certain employees. Restricted stock awards are non-vested stock awards. Restricted stock awards are independent of option grants and are generally subject to forfeiture if employment terminates prior to the release of the restrictions. Such awards generally vest within 30 days to five years from the date of grant. During that period, ownership of the shares cannot be transferred. Restricted stock has the same cash dividend and voting rights as other common stock and is considered to be currently issued and outstanding. The Corporation expenses the cost of restricted stock awards, which is determined to be the fair market value of the shares at the date of grant, ratably over the period during which the restrictions lapse. There were no restricted stock awards outstanding at March 31,June 30, 2011 and 2010.
 
There were 30,564 and 38,203 shares of common stock underlying granted options for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The fair value of share-based payment awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions and weighted average fair values at the time the grants were awarded:
 
 Six Months Ended 
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
  June 30, 
 2011  2010  2011  2010 
Weighted average fair value of grants $1.89  $2.16  $1.89  $2.16 
Risk-free interest rate  2.19%  2.29%  2.19%  2.29%
Dividend yield  1.32%  1.41%  1.32%  1.41%
Expected volatility  22.25%  28.6%  22.25%  28.6%
Expected life in months  65   62   65   62 
 
Activity under the principal option plans as of March 31,June 30, 2011 and changes during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 were as follows:
 
      Weighted-   
      Average   
    Weighted- Remaining   
    Average Contractual Aggregate 
    Exercise Term Intrinsic 
 Shares  
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price
  
Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
  Shares  Price (Years) Value 
Outstanding at December 31, 2010  198,946  $9.75         198,946  $9.75     
Granted  30,564   8.28         30,564   8.28     
Exercised  (3,648)  1.83         (3,648)  1.83     
Forfeited/cancelled/expired  (12,857)  11.75         (12,857)  11.75     
Outstanding at March 31, 2011  213,005  $9.56   5.56  $173,071 
Exercisable at March 31, 2011  144,408  $9.78   3.98  $114,313 
Outstanding at June 30, 2011  213,005  $9.56 5.31 $ 286,684 
Exercisable at June 30, 2011  147,015  $9.89 3.77 $ 176,266 
 
The aggregate intrinsic value of options above represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the Corporation’s closing stock price on the last trading day of the firstsecond quarter of 2011 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on March 31,June 30, 2011. This amount changes based on the fair value of the Corporation’s stock.
 
As of March 31,June 30, 2011, there was approximately $89,000$75,000 of total unrecognized compensation expense relating to unvested stock options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.61.49 years.
 
Note 4.  Recent Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2010-20, Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, will help investors assess the credit risk of a company’s receivables portfolio and the adequacy of its allowance for credit losses held against the portfolio by expanding credit risk disclosures. 
7

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
This ASU requires more information about the credit quality of financing receivables in the disclosures to financial statements, such as aging information and credit quality indicators.  Both new and existing disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment or class.  The disaggregation of information is based on how a company develops its allowance for credit losses and how it manages its credit exposure.
The amendments in this Update apply to all public and nonpublic entities with financing receivables.  Financing receivables include loans and trade accounts receivable.  However, short-term trade accounts receivable, receivables measured at fair value or lower of cost or fair value, and debt securities are exempt from these disclosure amendments. 
In December 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-28, "When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts." Under GAAP, the evaluation of goodwill impairment is a two-step test. In Step 1, an entity must assess whether the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. If it does, an entity must perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test to determine whether goodwill has been impaired and to calculate the amount of that impairment. The provisions of this ASU modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. The provisions of this ASU are effective for the Corporation's reporting period ended March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2011, the Corporation had no reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts or reporting units where there was a reasonable possibility of failing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. As a result, the adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Corporation's statements of income and condition.
 
In January 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-01, "Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20." The provisions of ASU No. 2010-20 required the disclosure of more granular information on the nature and extent of troubled debt restructurings and their effect on the Allowance for the period ended March 31,June 30, 2011. The amendments in this ASU defer the effective date related to these disclosures, enabling creditors to provide those disclosures after the FASB completes its project clarifying the guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. As the provisions of this ASU only defer the effective date of disclosure requirements related to troubled debt restructurings, the adoption of this ASU will have no impact on the Corporation's statements of income and condition.

7


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, “A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring.” The provisions of ASU No. 2011-02 provide additional guidance related to determining whether a creditor has granted a concession, include factors and examples for creditors to consider in evaluating whether a restructuring results in a delay in payment that is insignificant, prohibit creditors from using the borrower’s effective rate test to evaluate whether a concession has been granted to the borrower, and add factors for creditors to use in determining whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties.  A provision in ASU No. 2011-02 also ends the FASB’s deferral of the additional disclosures about trouble debt restructuring as required by ASU No. 2010-20.  The provisions of ASU No. 2011-02 are effective for the Corporation’s reporting period ending September 30, 2011.  The adoption of ASU No. 2011-02 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s statements of income and condition.
 
In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03, “Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements.”  ASU No. 2011-03 modifies the criteria for determining when repurchase agreements would be accounted for as a secured borrowing rather than as a sale.  Currently, an entity that maintains effective control over transferred financial assets must account for the transfer as a secured borrowing rather than as a sale.  The provisions of ASU No. 2011-03 removes from the assessment of effective control the criterion requiring the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms, even in the event of default by the transferee.  The FASB believes that contractual rights and obligations determine effective control and that there does not need to be a requirement to assess the ability to exercise those rights.  ASU No. 2011-03 does not change the other existing criteria used in the assessment of effective control.  The provisions of ASU No. 2011-03 are effective prospectively for transactions, or modifications of existing transactions, that occur on or after January 1, 2012.  As the Corporation accounts for all of its repurchase agreements as collateralized financing arrangements, the adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation’s statements of income and condition.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.”  ASU No. 2011-04 results in a consistent definition of fair value and common requirements for measurement of and disclosure about fair value between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”).  The changes to U.S. GAAP as a result of ASU No. 2011-04 are as follows:  (1) The concepts of highest and best use and valuation premise are only relevant when measuring the fair value of nonfinancial assets (that is, it does not apply to financial assets or any liabilities); (2) U.S. GAAP currently prohibits application of a blockage factor in valuing financial instruments with quoted prices in active markets;  ASU No. 2011-04 extends that prohibition to all fair value measurements; (3) An exception is provided to the basic fair value measurement principles for an entity that holds a group of financial assets and financial liabilities with offsetting positions in market risks or counterparty credit risk that are managed on the basis of the entity’s net exposure to either of those risks; this exception allows the entity, if certain criteria are met, to measure the fair value of the net asset or liability position in a manner consistent with how market participants would price the net risk position; (4) Aligns the fair value measurement of instruments classified within an entity’s shareholders’ equity with the guidance for liabilities; and (5) Disclosure requirements have been enhanced for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements to disclose quantitative information about unobservable inputs and assumptions used, todescribe the valuation processes used by the entity, and to describe the sensitivity of fair value measurements to changes in unobservable inputs and interrelationships between those inputs.  In addition, entities must report the level in the fair value hierarchy of items that are not measured at fair value in the statement of condition but whose fair value must be disclosed.  The provisions of ASU No. 2011-04 are effective for the Corporation’s interim reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2011.  The adoption of ASU No. 2011-04 is not expected to have a material impact on the Corporation’s statements of income or statements of condition.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income.”  The provisions of ASU No. 2011-05 allow an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements.  In both choices, an entity is required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income.  The statement(s) are required to be presented with equal prominence as the other primary financial statements.  ASU No. 2011-05 eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in shareholders’ equity but does not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income.  The provisions of ASU No. 2011-05 are effective for the Corporation’s interim reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2011, with retrospective application required.  The adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 is expected to result in presentation changes to the Corporation’s statements of income and the addition of a statement of comprehensive income.  The adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 will have no impact on the Corporation’s statements of condition.

8


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 5 — Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses
 
Loans are stated at their principal amounts inclusive of net deferred loan origination fees. Interest income is credited as earned except when a loan becomes past due 90 days or more and doubt exists as to the ultimate collection of interest or principal; in those cases the recognition of income is discontinued. Loans that are past due 90 days or more that are both well secured and in the process of collection will remain on an accruing basis. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, interest accruals cease and uncollected accrued interest is reversed and charged against current income.
 
8

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In July 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the "FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2010-20, "Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses," which requires that the Corporation provide a greater level of disaggregated information about the credit quality of the Corporation’s loans and leases and the allowance for loan and lease losses (the "Allowance"). This ASU also requires the Corporation to disclose on a prospective basis, additional information related to credit quality indicators, non-accrual loans and leases, and past due information. The Corporation adopted the provisions of this ASU in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2010. As this ASU amends only the disclosure requirements for loans and leases and the Allowance, the adoption of this ASU for the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2011 and the year ended March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, had no impact on the Corporation’s statements of income and condition. The required disclosures are presented in the following tables and related discussion later in this Note.
 
Portfolio segments are defined as the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic methodology to determine its Allowance. Management has determined that the Corporation has two portfolio segments of loans and leases (commercial and consumer) in determining the Allowance. Both quantitative and qualitative factors are used by management at the portfolio segment level in determining the adequacy of the Allowance for the Corporation. Classes of loans and leases are a disaggregation of a Corporation's portfolio segments. Classes are defined as a group of loans and leases which share similar initial measurement attributes, risk characteristics, and methods for monitoring and assessing credit risk. Management has determined that the Corporation has five classes of loans and leases (Commercial and industrial (including lease financing), Commercial – real estate, Construction, Residential mortgage (including home equity) and Installment.
 
Generally, all classes of commercial and consumer loans and leases are placed on non-accrual status upon becoming contractually past due 90 days or more as to principal or interest (unless loans and leases are adequately secured by collateral, are in the process of collection, and are reasonably expected to result in repayment), when terms are renegotiated below market levels, or where substantial doubt about full repayment of principal or interest is evident..evident. For certain installment loans the entire outstanding balance on the loan is charged-off when the loan becomes 60 days past due.
 
Payments received on non-accrual loans are applied against principal. A loan may only be restored to an accruing basis when it again becomes well secured and in the process of collection or all past due amounts have been collected.collected and six months of payments to demonstrate that the borrower can continue to meet the loan terms. Loan origination fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and recognized over the life of the loan as an adjustment to the loan’s yield using the level yield method.
 
Impaired Loans
 
The Corporation accounts for impaired loans in accordance with FASB ASC 310-10-35 (previously SFAS No. 114, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan” as amended by SFAS No. 118, “Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan — Income Recognition and Disclosures”). The value of impaired loans is based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, as a practical expedient, at the loan’s observable market price or at the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
 
The Corporation has defined its population of impaired loans to include all non-accrual and troubled debt restructuring loans. As part of the evaluation of the value of impaired loans, the Corporation reviews all non-homogeneous loans for impairment internally classified as substandard or below, in each instance above an established dollar threshold of $200,000.$200,000 for impairment internally classified as substandard or below. Smaller impaired non-homogeneous loans and impaired homogeneous loans are not measured for specific reserves and are covered under the Corporation’s general reserve.

9


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will not be able to collect all amounts due from the borrower in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan, including scheduled interest payments. Impaired loans include all classes of commercial and consumer non-accruing loans and all loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring ("TDR").
 
When a loan has been identified as being impaired, the amount of impairment is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's effective interest rate, the loan's observable market price, or the estimated fair value of the collateral, less any selling costs, if the loan is collateral-dependent. If the measurement of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (including accrued interest, net of deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premiums or discounts), an impairment is recognized by creating or adjusting an existing allocation of the Allowance, or by recording a partial charge-off of the loan to its fair value. Interest payments made on impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount is reasonably assured, in which case interest income may be accrued or recognized on a cash basis.
 
9

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Loans Modified in a Troubled Debt Restructuring
 
Loans are considered to have been modified in a TDR when due to a borrower's financial difficulties, the Corporation makes certain concessions to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. Modifications may include interest rate reductions, principal or interest forgiveness, forbearance, and other actions intended to minimize economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral. Generally, a non-accrual loan that has been modified in a TDR remains on non-accrual status for a period of six months to demonstrate that the borrower is able to meet the terms of the modified loan. However, performance prior to the modification, or significant events that coincide with the modification, are included in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms and may result in the loan being returned to accrual status at the time of loan modification or after a shorter performance period. If the borrower's ability to meet the revised payment schedule is uncertain, the loan remains on non-accrual status.
 
Reserve for Credit Losses
 
The Corporation's reserve for credit losses is comprised of two components, the Allowance and the reserve for unfunded commitments (the "Unfunded Commitments").
 
Allowance for Loan Losses
 
The allowance for loan losses (“allowance”) is maintained at a level determined adequate to provide for probable loan losses. The allowance is increased by provisions charged to operations and reduced by loan charge-offs, net of recoveries. The allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the loan portfolio considering economic conditions, the volume and nature of the loan portfolio, historical loan loss experience and individual credit situations.
 
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses. In connection with the determination of the allowance for loan losses, management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties.
 
The ultimate collectability of a substantial portion of the Bank’s loan portfolio is susceptible to changes in the real estate market and economic conditions in the State of New Jersey and the impact of such conditions on the creditworthiness of the borrowers.
 
Management believes that the allowance for loan losses is adequate. Management uses available information to recognize loan losses; however, future additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examinations.
 
Reserve for Unfunded Commitments
 
The reserve for unfunded commitments is maintained at a level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to unfunded credit facilities and is included in other liabilities in the consolidated statements of condition. The determination of the adequacy of the reserve is based upon an evaluation of the unfunded credit facilities, including an assessment of historical commitment utilization experience, and credit risk. Net adjustments to the reserve for unfunded commitments are included in other expense.
 
The following table sets forth the composition of the Corporation’s loan portfolio including net deferred fees and costs, at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

  
March 31,
 
December 31,
  2011 2010
   (Dollars in Thousands)
Commercial and industrial $127,131  $121,034 
Commercial real estate  386,241   372,001 
Construction  44,944   49,744 
Residential mortgage  157,455   165,154 
Installment  325   511 
Total loans $716,096  $708,444 
10


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  
June 30,
  
December 31,
 
  2011  2010 
  (Dollars in Thousands) 
Commercial and industrial $126,304  $121,034 
Commercial real estate  371,768   372,001 
Construction  40,402   49,744 
Residential mortgage  159,321   165,154 
Installment  353   511 
Total loans $698,148  $708,444 
 
Included in the loan balances above are net deferred loan costs of $207,000$83,000 and $258,000 at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
 
10

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
At March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, loans to executive officers and directors aggregated approximately $3,504,000$2,862,000 and $5,456,000, respectively. During the period ended March 31,June 30, 2011, the Corporation made no new loans to executive officers and directors; payments by such persons during 2011 aggregated $1,952,000.$2,594,000.
 
Management is of the opinion that the above loans were made on the same terms and conditions as those prevailing for comparable transactions with non-related borrowers.
 
At March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, loan balances of approximately $391.9$352.6 million and $435.9 million, respectively, were pledged to secure short term borrowings from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and Federal Home Loan Bank Advances.
 
The following table presents information about loan receivables on non-accrual status at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
 
Loans Receivable on Non-Accrual Status

Loans Receivable on Non-Accrual Status      
 March 31, 2011  December 31, 2010  June 30, 2011  December 31, 2010 
 (Dollars in Thousands)  (Dollars in Thousands) 
Commercial and Industrial $  $456  $100  $456 
Commercial Real Estate  3,532   3,563   374   3,563 
Construction  6,303   5,865   6,297   5,865 
Residential Mortgage  2,501   1,290   3,366   1,290 
Total loans receivable on non-accrual status $12,336  $11,174  $10,137  $11,174 
 
The Corporation continuously monitors the credit quality of its loans receivable. In addition to the internal staff, the Corporation utilizes the services of a third party loan review firm to rate the credit quality of its loans receivable. Credit quality is monitored by reviewing certain credit quality indicators. Assets classified “Pass” are deemed to possess average to superior credit quality, requiring no more than normal attention. Assets classified as “Special Mention” have generally acceptable credit quality yet possess higher risk characteristics/circumstances than satisfactory assets. Such conditions include strained liquidity, slow pay, stale financial statements, or other conditions that require more stringent attention from the lending staff. These conditions, if not corrected, may weaken the loan quality or inadequately protect the Corporation’s credit position at some future date. Assets are classified “Substandard” if the asset has a well defined weakness that requires management’s attention to a greater degree than for loans classified special mention. Such weakness, if left uncorrected, could possibly result in the compromised ability of the loan to perform to contractual requirements. An asset is classified as “Doubtful” if it is inadequately protected by the net worth and/or paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral, if any, that secures the obligation. Assets classified as doubtful include assets for which there is a “distinct possibility” that a degree of loss will occur if the inadequacies are not corrected. All loans past due 90 days or more and all impaired loans are included in the appropriate category below. The following table presents information about the loan credit quality at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Credit Quality Indicators 
  March 31, 2011 
  (Dollars in Thousands) 
  Pass  Special Mention  Substandard  Doubtful  Total 
Commercial and industrial $122,369  $3,224  $1,538  $  $127,131 
Commercial real estate  348,263   22,036   15,942      386,241 
Construction  38,642      4,025   2,277   44,944 
Residential mortgage  152,965      4,490      157,455 
Installment  325            325 
Total loans $662,564  $25,260  $25,995  $2,277  $716,096 
 
11

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Credit Quality Indicators
        June 30, 2011       
        (Dollars in Thousands)       
  Pass  Special Mention  Substandard  Doubtful  Total 
Commercial and industrial $122,427  $2,379  $1,498  $  $126,304 
Commercial real estate  331,267   26,472   14,029      371,768 
Construction  34,106      6,296      40,402 
Residential mortgage  153,167      6,154      159,321 
Installment  353            353 
                     
Total loans $641,320  $28,851  $27,977  $  $698,148 
Credit Quality Indicators                    
          December 31, 2010         
          (Dollars in Thousands)         
  Pass  Special Mention  Substandard  Doubtful  Total 
Commercial and industrial $116,741  $1,929  $2,364  $  $121,034 
Commercial real estate  345,096   15,383   11,522      372,001 
Construction  43,879      3,588   2,277   49,744 
Residential mortgage  161,558      3,596      165,154 
Installment  511            511 
                     
Total loans $667,785  $17,312  $21,070  $2,277  $708,444 
 
Credit Quality Indicators 
  December 31, 2010 
  (Dollars in Thousands) 
  Pass  Special Mention  Substandard  Doubtful  Total 
Commercial and industrial $116,741  $1,929  $2,364  $  $121,034 
Commercial real estate  345,096   15,383   11,522      372,001 
Construction  43,879      3,588   2,277   49,744 
Residential mortgage  161,558      3,596      165,154 
Installment  511            511 
Total loans $667,785  $17,312  $21,070  $2,277  $708,444 
Note 5 — Loans and the Allowance for Loan Losses – (continued)
 
The following table provides an analysis of the impaired loans at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
 
Impaired LoansImpaired Loans          
    At or for the six months ended June 30, 2011 
 At or for the three months ended March 31, 2011  (Dollars in Thousands) 
No Related Allowance Recorded (Dollars in Thousands) 
 
Recorded Investment
  
Unpaid Principal Balance
  
Related
Allowance
  
Average Recorded
Investment
  
Interest
Income
Recognized
        Related 
Commercial and industrial $908  $908  $  $908  $11 
 Recorded Investment  Unpaid Principal Balance  Allowance 
No related allowance recorded:         
         
Commercial real estate  3,953   4,594      3,966   5  $1,671  $1,972  $ 
Construction  2,277   5,054      2,277      2,277   5,054    
Residential mortgage                        
Total $7,138  $10,556  $  $7,151  $16  $3,948  $7,026  $ 
                                
With An Allowance RecordedWith An Allowance Recorded             
 Recorded Investment  Unpaid Principal Balance  
Related
Allowance
  
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest Income
Recognized
             
Commercial real estate $4,180  $4,180  $609  $4,180  $34  $4,554  $4,554  $581 
Construction  4,025   4,025   413   4,036      4,020   4,020   648 
Residential mortgage  1,354   1,354   14   1,354   14   3,207   3,207   61 
Total $9,559  $9,559  $1,036  $9,570  $48  $11,781  $11,781  $1,290 
                                
Total                                
Commercial and industrial $908  $908  $  $908  $11  $  $  $ 
Commercial real estate  8,133   8,774   609   8,146   39   6,225   6,526   581 
Construction  6,302   9,079   413   6,313      6,297   9,074   648 
Residential mortgage  1,354   1,354   14   1,354   14   3,207   3,207   61 
Total (including related allowance) $16,697  $20,115  $1,036  $16,721  $64  $15,729  $18,807  $1,290 
             
Impaired LoansImpaired Loans             
               
 At or for the year ended December 31, 2010  At or for the year ended December 31, 2010 
No Related Allowance Recorded (Dollars in Thousands) 
 (Dollars in Thousands) 
         Related 
 Recorded Investment  Unpaid Principal Balance  Allowance 
No related allowance recorded:            
 
Recorded Investment
  
Unpaid Principal Balance
  
Related
Allowance
  
Average Recorded Investment
  
Interest
Income
Recognized
             
Commercial and industrial $1,364  $1,908  $  $1,933  $87  $1,364  $1,908  $ 
Commercial real estate  3,984   4,625      4,274   78   3,984   4,625    
Construction  5,865   8,642      6,855   112   5,865   8,642    
Residential mortgage  1,462   1,765      1,711   27   1,462   1,765    
Total $12,675  $16,940  $  $14,773  $304  $12,675  $16,940  $ 
            
With An Allowance Recorded            
            
Commercial real estate $4,180  $4,180  $618 
Residential mortgage  1,354   1,354   21 
Total $5,534  $5,534  $639 
            
Total            
Commercial and industrial $1,364  $1,908  $ 
Commercial real estate  8,164   8,805   618 
Construction  5,865   8,642    
Residential mortgage  2,816   3,119   21 
Total (including related allowance) $18,209  $22,474  $639 
 
 
12

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

With An Allowance Recorded                    
 Recorded Investment  Unpaid Principal Balance  
Related
Allowance
  
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest Income
Recognized
  
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2011
  
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011
  
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2011
 
Commercial real estate $4,180  $4,180  $618  $4,181  $204 
Residential mortgage  1,354   1,354   21   1,356   76 
Total $5,534  $5,534  $639  $5,537  $280 
                     (Dollars in Thousands) 
Total                    
 
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest
Income
Recognized
  
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest Income
Recognized
  
Average Recorded
Investment
  
Interest
Income
Recognized
 
                  
Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded:Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded:          
                  
Commercial and industrial $1,364  $1,908  $  $1,933  $87  $499  $  $703  $11  $1,933  $87 
Commercial real estate  8,164   8,805   618   8,455   282   3,622   79   3,773   84   4,274   78 
Construction  5,865   8,642      6,855   112   2,277      
           2,277
      6,855   112 
Residential mortgage  2,816   3,119   21   3,067   103               1,711   27 
Total (including related allowance) $18,209  $22,474  $639  $20,310  $584 
Total $6,398  $79  $6,753  $95  $14,773  $304 
                        
Impaired loans with an allowance recorded:Impaired loans with an allowance recorded:                 
                        
Commercial and industrial $  $  $  $  $  $ 
Commercial real estate  4,517   34   4,554   68   4,181   204 
Construction  4,029      4,029          
Residential mortgage  2,992   16   3,210   30   1,356   76 
Total $11,538  $50  $11,793  $98  $5,537  $280 
                        
Impaired loans:Impaired loans:                     
                        
Commercial and industrial $499  $  $703  $11  $1,933  $87 
Commercial real estate  8,139   113   8,327   152   8,455   282 
Construction  6,306      6,306      6,855   112 
Residential mortgage  2,992   16   3,210   30   3,067   103 
Total $17,936  $129  $18,546  $193  $20,310  $584 
 
The Corporation defines an impaired loan as a loan for which it is probable, based on information available at the determination date, that the Corporation will not collect all amounts due under the contractual terms of the loan. At March 31,June 30, 2011 impaired loans were primarily collateral dependent, and totaled $16.7$15.7 million. Specific allowance for loan loss of $1.04$1.3 million was assigned to impaired loans of $9.6$11.8 million. Loans in the amount of $7.1$3.9 million had no specific allowance allocation.
 
Loans are considered to have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring when due to a borrower's financial difficulties, the Corporation makes certain concessions to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. Modifications may include interest rate reductions, principal or interest forgiveness, forbearance, and other actions intended to minimize economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral. Generally, a non-accrual loan that has been modified in a troubled debt restructuring remains on non-accrual status for a period of six months to demonstrate that the borrower is able to meet the terms of the modified loan. However, performance prior to the modification, or significant events that coincide with the modification, are included in assessing whether the borrower can meet the new terms and may result in the loan being returned to accrual status at the time of loan modification or after a shorter performance period. If the borrower's ability to meet the revised payment schedule is uncertain, the loan remains on non-accrual status. Included in impaired loans at March 31,June 30, 2011 are loans that are deemed troubled debt restructurings. Of these loans, $7.0$8.2 million, 99%94% of which are included in the tables above, are performing under the restructured terms and are accruing interest.

13


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
The following table provides an analysis of the age of loans that are past due at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

Aging Analysis

   March 31, 2011 
  (Dollars in Thousands) 
  
30-59 Days Past
Due
  
60-89 Days Past
Due
  
Greater Than
90 Days
  
Total Past
Due
  Current  
Total Loans
Receivable
  
Loans
Receivable >
90 Days And
Accruing
 
Commercial and Industrial $579  $177  $224  $980  $126,151  $127,131  $224 
Commercial Real Estate  2,080   857   3,532   6,469   379,772   386,241    
Construction       ��6,303   6,303   38,641   44,944    
Residential Mortgage  3,081   626   2,964   6,671   150,784   157,455   463 
Installment  11         11   314   325    
Total $5,751  $1,660  $13,023  $20,434  $695,662  $716,096  $687 

   December 31, 2010 
  (Dollars in Thousands) 
  
30-59 Days Past
Due
  
60-89 Days Past
Due
  
Greater Than
90 Days
  
Total Past
Due
  Current  
Total Loans
Receivable
  
Loans
Receivable >
90 Days And
Accruing
 
Commercial and Industrial $1,509  $476  $456  $2,441  $118,593  $121,034  $ 
Commercial Real Estate  4,290   2,229   3,563   10,082   361,919   372,001    
Construction  170   449   5,865   6,484   43,260   49,744    
Residential Mortgage  1,814   309   2,004   4,127   161,027   165,154   714 
Installment  9         9   502   511    
Total $7,792  $3,463  $11,888  $23,143  $685,301  $708,444  $714 
13

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Aging Analysis                 
  June 30, 2011 
  (Dollars in Thousands) 
                    Loans 
                    Receivable > 
  30-59 Days Past  60-89 Days Past  Greater Than  Total Past     Total Loans  90 Days And 
  Due  Due  90 Days  Due  Current  Receivable  Accruing 
Commercial and Industrial $1,311  $82  $350  $1,743  $124,561  $126,304  $250 
Commercial Real Estate  383   1,396   826   2,605   369,163   371,768   452 
Construction        6,297   6,297   34,105   40,402    
Residential Mortgage  387   105   3,677   4,169   155,152   159,321   311 
Installment  2         2   351   353    
Total $2,083  $1,583  $11,150  $14,816  $683,332  $698,148  $1,013 
                             
  December 31, 2010 
  (Dollars in Thousands) 
                          Loans 
                          Receivable > 
  30-59 Days Past  60-89 Days Past  Greater Than  Total Past      Total Loans  90 Days And 
  Due  Due  90 Days  Due  Current  Receivable  Accruing 
Commercial and Industrial $1,509  $476  $456  $2,441  $118,593  $121,034  $ 
Commercial Real Estate  4,290   2,229   3,563   10,082   361,919   372,001    
Construction  170   449   5,865   6,484   43,260   49,744    
Residential Mortgage  1,814   309   2,004   4,127   161,027   165,154   714 
Installment  9         9   502   511    
Total $7,792  $3,463  $11,888  $23,143  $685,301  $708,444  $714 
 
The following table details the amount of loans receivable that are evaluated individually, and collectively, for impairment, and the related portion of the allowance for loan loss that is allocated to each loan portfolio segment:

Allowance for loan and lease losses

 March 31, 2011  June 30, 2011 
 (Dollars in Thousands)  (Dollars in Thousands) 
 C & I  Comm R/E  Construction  Res Mtge  Installment  Unallocated  Total  C & I  Comm R/E  Construction  Res Mtge  Installment  Unallocated  Total 
Allowance for loan and lease losses:Allowance for loan and lease losses:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $  $609  $413  $14  $  $  $1,036  $  $581  $648  $61  $  $  $1,290 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  1,378   5,574   487   938   51   127   8,555   1,376   5,574   482   944   56   114   8,546 
Total $1,378  $6,183  $900  $952  $51  $127  $9,591  $1,376  $6,155  $1,130  $1,005  $56  $114  $9,836 
                                                        
Loans Receivable                                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $2,010  $16,182  $6,302  $1,354  $  $  $25,848  $1,079  $14,210  $6,296  $3,208  $  $  $24,793 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  125,121   370,059   38,642   156,101   325      690,248   125,225   357,558   34,106   156,113   353      673,355 
Total $127,131  $386,241  $44,944  $157,455  $325  $  $716,096  $126,304  $371,768  $40,402  $159,321  $353  $  $698,148 
 
Allowance for loan and lease losses
14


   December 31, 2010 
  (Dollars in Thousands) 
  C & I  Comm R/E  Construction  Res Mtge  Installment  Unallocated  Total 
Allowance for loan and lease losses:                     
Individually evaluated for impairment $  $618  $  $21  $  $  $639 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  1,272   5,097   551   1,017   52   239   8,228 
Total $1,272  $5,715  $551  $1,038  $52  $239  $8,867 
                             
Loans Receivable                            
Individually evaluated for impairment $2,748  $11,960  $5,865  $1,354  $  $  $21,927 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  118,286   360,041   43,879   163,800   511      686,517 
Total $121,034  $372,001  $49,744  $165,154  $511  $  $708,444 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Allowance for loan and lease losses              
  December 31, 2010 
  (Dollars in Thousands) 
  C & I  Comm R/E  Construction  Res Mtge  Installment  Unallocated  Total 
Allowance for loan and lease losses:                     
Individually evaluated for impairment $  $618  $  $21  $  $  $639 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  1,272   5,097   551   1,017   52   239   8,228 
Total $1,272  $5,715  $551  $1,038  $52  $239  $8,867 
                             
Loans Receivable                            
Individually evaluated for impairment $2,748  $11,960  $5,865  $1,354  $  $  $21,927 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  118,286   360,041   43,879   163,800   511      686,517 
Total $121,034  $372,001  $49,744  $165,154  $511  $  $708,444 
 
The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses is analyzed quarterly. Many factors are considered, including growth in the portfolio, delinquencies, nonaccrual loan levels, and other factors inherent in the extension of credit. There have been no material changes to the allowance for loan loss methodology as disclosed in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
14

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 A summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses is as follows:

 Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 
 
(Dollars in Thousands)
 
 C & I  Comm R/E  Construction  Res Mtge  Installment  Unallocated  Total 
Balance at April 1, $1,378  $6,183  $900  $952  $51  $127  $9,591 
                            
Charge offs  (20)           (4)     (24)
                            
Recoveries     15      2   2      19 
                            
Provision  18   (43)  230   51   7   (13)  250 
                            
Balance at June 30, $1,376  $6,155  $1,130  $1,005  $56  $114  $9,836 
                            
 March 31, 2011  Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 
 (Dollars in Thousands)  
(Dollars in thousands)
 
 C & I  Comm R/E  Construction  Res Mtge  Installment  Unallocated  Total  C & I  Comm R/E  Construction  Res Mtge  Installment  Unallocated  Total 
                                                 
Balance at January 1, $1,272  $5,715  $551  $1,038  $52  $239  $8,867  $1,272  $5,715  $551  $1,038  $52  $239  $8,867 
                                                        
Charge offs  165         23   3      191   (185)        (23)  (7)     (215)
                                                        
Recoveries  35            2      37   35   15      2   4      56 
                                                        
Provision  236   468   349   (63)     (112)  878   254   425   579   (12)  7   (125)  1,128 
                                                        
Balance at March 31, $1,378  $6,183  $900  $952  $51  $127  $9,591 
Balance at June 30, $1,376  $6,155  $1,130  $1,005  $56  $114  $9,836 
 
The amount of interest income that would have been recorded on non-accrual loans during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, the year ended December 31, 2010, and the year ended December 31, 2009, had payments remained in accordance with the original contractual terms, was $215,000,$324,000 and $598,000, and $431,000, respectively.
 
At March 31,June 30, 2011, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers whose loans were on non-accrual status or were contractually past due in excess of 90 days and still accruing interest.
 
The policy of the Corporation is to generally grant commercial, mortgage and installment loans to New Jersey residents and businesses within its market area. The borrowers’ abilities to repay their obligations are dependent upon various factors, including the borrowers’ income and net worth, cash flows generated by the borrowers’ underlying collateral, value of the underlying collateral, and priority of the lender’s lien on the property. Such factors are dependent upon various economic conditions and individual circumstances beyond the control of the Corporation. The Corporation is therefore subject to risk of loss. The Corporation believes its lending policies and procedures adequately minimize the potential exposure to such risks and that adequate provisions for loan losses are provided for all known and inherent risks. Collateral and/or personal guarantees are required for virtually all loans.

15


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 6.  Comprehensive Income
 
Total comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period arising from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. The Corporation’s other comprehensive income is comprised of unrealized holding gains and losses on investment securities available-for-sale, and actuarial losses of defined benefit plans, net of taxes.
 
Disclosure of comprehensive income for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, and 2010 is presented in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity. The table below provides a reconciliation of the components of other comprehensive income (loss) to the data provided in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity.
 
The components of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, were as follows for the periods indicated:

  
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
   2011  2010 
  (in thousands) 
Reclassification adjustment of OTTI losses included in income $(95) $(4,390)
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities  1,389   8,461 
Reclassification adjustment for net gains arising during this period  861   1,046 
Net unrealized gains  2,155   5,117 
Tax effect  (861)  (2,030)
Net of tax amount  1,294   3,087 
Change in minimum pension liability  (142)   
Tax effect  57    
Net of tax amount  (85)   
Other comprehensive income, net of tax $1,209  $3,087 
 
15

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
   2011 2010
  (in thousands)
Reclassification adjustment of OTTI losses included in income $237  $5,095 
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities  7,543   4,661 
Reclassification adjustment for net gains arising during this period  (1,804)  (2,408)
Net unrealized gains  on Available-for-sale securities  5,976   7,348 
Unrealized holding gains on securities transferred from Available-for-sale to Held-to-maturity  333    
Net unrealized gain on securities  6,309   7,348 
Tax effect  (2,474)  (2,907)
    Net of tax amount  3,835   4,441 
Change in minimum pension liability  (142)   
Tax effect  57    
    Net of tax amount  (85)   
Other comprehensive income, net of tax $3,750  $4,441 
 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of the following:

 March 31, 2011  
December 31, 
2010
  June 30, 2011 
December 31,
2010
 (in thousands)  (in thousands)
Investment securities available-for-sale, net of tax $(4,033) $(5,327) $(1,700) $(5,327)   
Unamortized component of transfer of securities from Available-for-sale to Held-to-maturity, net of tax 208    
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement plans, net of tax  (2,433)  (2,348)  (2,433)  (2,348)   
Total accumulated other comprehensive loss $(6,466) $(7,675) $(3,925) $(7,675)   
 
Note 7.  Investment Securities
 
All of theThe Corporation’s investment securities are classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at March 31,June 30, 2011 and available-for-sale at December 31, 2010. Investment securities available-for-sale are reported at fair value with unrealized gains or losses included in equity, net of tax. Accordingly, the carrying value of such securities reflects their fair value at the balance sheet date. Fair value is based upon either quoted market prices, or in certain cases where there is limited activity in the market for a particular instrument, assumptions are made to determine their fair value. See Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a further discussion.
 
Transfers of debt securities from the available-for-sale category to the held-to-maturity category are made at fair value at the date of transfer. The unrealized holding gain or loss at the date of transfer remains in accumulated other comprehensive income and in the carrying value of the held-to-maturity investment security. Premiums or discounts on investment securities are amortized or accreted using the effective interest method over the life of the security as an adjustment of yield. Unrealized holding gains or losses that remain in accumulated other comprehensive income are amortized or accreted over the remaining life of the security as an adjustment of yield, offsetting the related amortization of the premium or accretion of the discount.
The following tables present information related to the Corporation’s investment securities available-for-sale at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

  
  March 31, 2011 
 (in thousands) 
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
              
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale:            
U.S. Treasury and agency securities $  $  $  $ 
Federal agency obligations  64,917   1,070   (496)  65,491 
Mortgage-backed securities  210,472   194   (2,976)  207,690 
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  56,644   164   (814)  55,994 
Trust preferred securities  22,247   98   (1,738)  20,607 
Corporate bonds and notes  53,846   74   (897)  53,023 
Collateralized mortgage obligations  3,748      (1,040)  2,708 
Equity securities  5,135   52   (324)  4,863 
Total $417,009  $1,652  $(8,285) $410,376 
                 
  December 31, 2010 
 
 
(in thousands)
 
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
                  
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale:                
U.S. Treasury and agency securities $7,123  $  $(128) $6,995 
Federal agency obligations  68,051   1,071   (641)  68,481 
Mortgage-backed securities  180,037   115   (2,419)  177,733 
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  38,312   1   (1,088)  37,225 
Trust preferred securities  21,222   26   (2,517)  18,731 
Corporate bonds and notes  63,047      (l,613)  61,434 
Collateralized mortgage obligations  3,941      (1,213)  2,728 
Equity securities  5,135      (382)  4,753 
Total $386,868  $1,213  $(10,001) $378,080 
 
16

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

  June 30, 2011 
     Gross  Gross    
  Amortized  Unrealized  Unrealized    
(in thousands) Cost  Gains  Losses  Fair Value 
             
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale:            
Federal agency obligations $52,972  $912  $(262) $53,622 
Residential mortgage pass-through securities  158,392   615   (795)  158,212 
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  32,662   310   (138)  32,834 
Trust preferred securities  22,279   67   (1,691)  20,655 
Corporate bonds and notes  105,115   321   (805)  104,631 
Collateralized mortgage obligations  3,471      (1,112)  2,359 
Equity securities  5,135   74   (308)  4,901 
Total $380,026  $2,299  $(5,111) $377,214 
                 
  June 30, 2011 
      Gross  Gross     
  Amortized  Unrealized  Unrealized     
(in thousands) Cost  Gains  Losses  Fair Value 
                 
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity:                
Federal agency obligations $4,030  $67  $  $4,097 
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  37,774   324   (73)  38,025 
Total $41,804  $391  $(73) $42,122 
                 
Total investment securities $421,830  $2,690  $(5,184) $419,336 
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Corporation reclassified at fair value approximately $36.0 million in available-for-sale investment securities to the held-to-maturity category. The related after-tax gains of approximately $218,000 remained in accumulated other comprehensive income and will be amortized over the remaining life of the securities as an adjustment of yield, offsetting the related amortization of the premium or accretion of the discount on the transferred securities. No gains or losses were recognized at the time of reclassification. Management considers the held-to-maturity classification of these investment securities to be appropriate as the Corporation has the positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity.
     December 31, 2010    
     Gross  Gross    
  Amortized  Unrealized  Unrealized    
(in thousands) Cost  Gains  Losses  Fair Value 
             
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale:            
U.S. Treasury and agency securities $7,123  $  $(128) $6,995 
Federal agency obligations  68,051   1,071   (641)  68,481 
Residential mortgage pass-through securities  180,037   115   (2,419)  177,733 
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  38,312   1   (1,088)  37,225 
Trust preferred securities  21,222   26   (2,517)  18,731 
Corporate bonds and notes  63,047      (l,613)  61,434 
Collateralized mortgage obligations  3,941      (1,213)  2,728 
Equity securities  5,135      (382)  4,753 
Total $386,868  $1,213  $(10,001) $378,080 
 
The following table presents information for investment securities available-for-sale at March 31,June 30, 2011, based on scheduled maturities. Actual maturities can be expected to differ from scheduled maturities due to prepayment or early call options of the issuer.

  March 31, 2011 
   
Amortized
Cost
  Fair Value 
   (in thousands) 
Due in one year or less $  $ 
Due after one year through five years  22,530   22,204 
Due after five years through ten years  37,601   36,814 
Due after ten years  141,270   138,805 
Mortgage-backed securities (1)
  210,473   207,690 
Equity securities  5,135   4,863 
Total investment securities available-for-sale $417,009  $410,376 
17


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
  June 30, 2011 
  Amortized    
  Cost  Fair Value 
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale:
 (in thousands) 
Due in one year or less $  $ 
Due after one year through five years  44,856   44,976 
Due after five years through ten years  65,664   65,070 
Due after ten years  105,979   104,055 
Mortgage-backed securities (1)
  158,392   158,212 
Equity securities  5,135   4,901 
Total $380,026  $377,214 
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity:
        
Due in one year or less $  $ 
Due after one year through five years      
Due after five years through ten years  987   1,001 
Due after ten years  40,817   41,121 
Total $41,804  $42,122 
         
Total investment securities $421,830  $419,336 


(1) Debt securities without stated maturities.
 
For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, available for sale investment securities sold amounted to approximately $76.6$158.2 million.  Gross realized gains on investment securities sold amounted to approximately $930,000,$1.9 million, while gross realized losses on investment securities sold amounted to approximately $69,000 for the period. For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2010, investment securities sold from the Corporation’s available-for-sale portfolio amounted to approximately $141.5$362.4 million.  Gross realized gains on investment securities sold amounted to approximately $1,057,000,$2.6 million, while gross realized losses on investment securities sold amounted to approximately $11,000$179,000 for the period. In addition, during the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation recorded other-than temporary impairment charges of $1,109,000 on two pooled trust preferred securities, $281,000 on three variable rate private label CMOs, and $3,000,000 on one trust preferred security.
 
For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, the Corporation recorded other-than temporary impairment (“OTTI”) charges of approximately $9,000$18,000 and principal losses of $86,000$219,000 on a variable rate private label collateralized mortgage obligation (“CMO”). DuringFor the first quarter ofsix months ended June 30, 2010, the Corporation recorded OTTI charges of $1,109,000$1,785,000 on two pooled trust preferred securities, $281,000$310,000 on threeone variable rate private label CMOs, and $3,000,000 on one trust preferred security.
 
The following summarizes OTTI charges for the periods indicated.
 
 Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
 March 31, 2011  March 31, 2010  June 30, 2011 June 30, 2010 
 (in thousands)  (in thousands) 
Debt securities $95  $4,390 
Other than temporary impairment charges $18 $310 
1 Trust Preferred security    3,000 
2 Pooled trust preferred securities    1,785 
Principal losses on 3 variable rate CMOs  219   
Total other-than-temporary impairment charges $95  $4,390  $237  $5,095 
 
The Corporation performs regular analysis on all its investment securities to determine whether a decline in fair value indicates that an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired in accordance with FASB ASC 320-10. FASB
ASC 320-10 requires companies to record OTTI charges, through earnings, if they have the intent to sell, or if it is more likely than not that they will be required to sell, an impaired debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If the Corporation intends to sell or it is more likely than not it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, less any current period credit loss, the OTTI is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its estimated fair value at the balance sheet date. If the Corporation does not intend to sell the security and it is more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period loss, and as such, it determines that a decline in fair value is other than temporary, the OTTI is separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of the OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected and is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings becomes the new amortized cost basis of the investment.

18

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
The Corporation’s assessment of whether an impairment is other than temporary includes factors such as whether the issuer has defaulted on scheduled payments, announced a restructuring and/or filed for bankruptcy, has
disclosed severe liquidity problems that cannot be resolved, disclosed a deteriorating financial condition or sustained significant losses. The Corporation maintains a watch list for the identification and monitoring of securities experiencing problems that require a heightened level of review. This could result from credit rating downgrades.
 
17

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following table presents detailed information for each trust preferred security held by the Corporation at March 31,June 30, 2011 which has at least one rating below investment grade.

                  Deferrals Expected 
                  and Deferrals/Defaults 
 Single            Lowest Number of Defaults as % of 
 Issuer    Adjusted     Gross Credit Banks as % of Remaining 
 or Class/  Cost  Fair  Unrealized Rating Currently Original Performing 
Deal Name 
Single
Issuer
or
Pooled
 
Class/
Tranche
  
Adjusted
Cost
Basis
  
 
Fair
Value
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
 
Lowest
Credit
Rating
Assigned
 
Number of
Banks
Currently
Performing
 
Deferrals
and
Defaults
as % of
Original
Collateral
 
Expected
Deferrals/Defaults
as % of
Remaining
Performing
Collateral
  Pooled 
Tranche
  Basis  Value  Gain (Loss) Assigned Performing Collateral Collateral 
 (dollars in thousands)  (dollars in thousands) 
Countrywide Capital IV Single    $1,769  $1,764  $(5) BB+  1 None None  Single    $1,770  $1,762  $(8)BB+  1 None None 
Countrywide Capital V Single     2,747   2,752   5 BB+  1 None None  Single     2,747   2,749   2 BB+  1 None None 
Countrywide Capital V Single     250   250    BB+  1 None None  Single     250   250    BB+  1 None None 
NPB Capital Trust II Single     868   894   26 NR  1 None None  Single     868   809   (59)NR  1 None None 
Citigroup Cap IX Single     991   908   (83) BB+  1 None None  Single     991   994   3 BB+  1 None None 
Citigroup Cap IX Single     1,903   1,752   (151) BB+  1 None None  Single     1,903   1,802   (101)BB+  1 None None 
Citigroup Cap XI Single     245   243   (2) BB+  1 None None  Single     245   233   (12)BB+  1 None None 
BAC Capital Trust X Single     2,500   2,342   (158) BB+  1 None None  Single     2,500   2,372   (128)BB+  1 None None 
NationsBank Cap Trust III Single     1,570   1,228   (342) BB+  1 None None  Single     1,570   1,264   (306)BB+  1 None None 
Morgan Stanley Cap Trust IV Single     2,500   2,388   (112) BB+  1 None None  Single     2,500   2,423   (77)BB+  1 None None 
Morgan Stanley Cap Trust IV Single     1,741   1,670   (71) BB+  1 None None  Single     1,741   1,695   (46)BB+  1 None None 
Saturns-GS 2004-06 Single     242   246   4 BBB-  1 None None  Single     242   241   (1)BBB-  1 None None 
Saturns-GS 2004-06 Single     312   317   5 BBB-  1 None None  Single     312   311   (1)BBB-  1 None None 
Saturns-GS 2004-04 Single     778   732   (46) BBB-  1 None None  Single     779   690   (89)BBB-  1 None None 
Saturns-GS 2004-04 Single     22   21   (1) BBB-  1 None None  Single     22   19   (3)BBB-  1 None None 
USB Capital VII Single     1,214   1,252   38 BBB+  1 None None  Single     1,214   1,259   45 BBB+  1 None None 
USB Capital VII Single     561   579   18 BBB+  1 None None  Single     561   581   20 BBB+  1 None None 
Goldman Sachs Single     999   968   (31) BBB-  1 None None  Single     999   927   (72)BBB-  1 None None 
ALESCO Preferred Funding VI Pooled  C2   243   114   (129) Ca 
 
43 of 66
(1)
 34.2% 43.5%
ALESCO Preferred Funding VII Pooled  C1   792   187   (605) Ca 
 
59 of 78
(1)
 30.0% 54.9%
ALESCO Preferred Funding                           
VI Pooled  C2   259   115   (144)Ca 
42 of 65 (1)
 34.2 % 28.9 % 
ALESCO Preferred Funding                           
VII Pooled  C1   806   222   (584)Ca 
58 of 78 (1)
 30.8 % 31.1 % 

 (1)Includes banks and insurance companies.
 
(2)
The Corporation owns two pooled trust preferred securities (“Pooled TRUPS”), which consist of securities issued by financial institutions and insurances companies. The Corporation holds the mezzanine tranche of such securities. Senior tranches generally are protected from defaults by over-collateralization and cash flow default protection provided by subordinated tranches, with senior tranches having the greatest protection and mezzanine tranches subordinated to the senior tranches. The Corporation’s analysis of these Pooled TRUPS falls within the scope of EITF 99-20, ASC 320-40 and uses a discounted cash flow model to determine the total OTTI loss. The model considers the structure, and term and the financial condition of the underlying issuers. Specifically, the model details interest rates, principal balances of note classes and underlying issuers and the allocation of the payments to the note classes according to a priority of payments specified in the offering circular and indenture. The current estimate of expected cash flows is based on the most recent trustee reports and other relevant market information including announcements of interest payment deferrals or defaults of underlying trust preferred securities. Assumptions used in the model include defaults rates, default rate timing profile and recovery rates. We assume no prepayments, as these Pooled TRUPS were issued at comparatively tight spreads and as such, there is little incentive, if any, to prepay.
 
One of the Pooled TRUPS, ALESCO 6, has incurred its eighthninth interruption of cash flow payments to date. Management reviewed the expected cash flow analysis and credit support to determine if it was probable that all principal and interest would be repaid, and recorded no other-than-temporary impairment charge for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 and $466,000 for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2010. The new cost basis for this security has been written down to $243,000$259,000 and has a par amount of $3.2 million. The other Pooled TRUP, ALESCO 7, incurred its sixthseventh interruption of cash flow payments to date. Management reviewed the expected cash flow analysis and credit support to determine if it was probable that all principal and interest would be repaid, and recorded no other-than-temporary impairment charge for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, , and $643,000$1,319,000 for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2010. The new cost basis for this security has been written down to $792,000$806,000 and has a par amount of $3.1 million.

 
1819

 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
Credit Loss Portion of OTTI Recognized in Earnings on Debt Securities

 Quarter  Year 
 Ended  Ended 
 June 30,  December 
 
Quarter
Ended
March 31,
2011
  
Year
Ended
December
31, 2010
  2011  31, 2010 
 (in thousands)  (in thousands) 
Balance of credit-related OTTI at January 1, $6,197  $3,621  $6,197  $3,621 
Addition:                
Credit losses on investment securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized  95   5,576   237   5,576 
Reduction:                
Credit losses on investment securities sold during the period     (3,000)     (3,000)
Balance of credit-related OTTI at period end $6,292  $6,197  $6,434  $6,197 
 
The Corporation owns three variable rate private label collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs), which were also evaluated for impairment. These CMOs were originally issued in 2006 and are 30 year Adjustable Rate Mortgage loans secured by a first lien, fully amortizing one-to-four residential mortgage loans. The tranche purchased was a Super Senior with an original credit rating of AAA/AAA. The top five states geographic concentration comprised in the deal were California 18.2 percent, Arizona 10.5 percent, Virginia 6.1 percent, Florida 6.5 percent and Nevada 6.3 percent. No one state exceeded a 25 percent concentration. These states have been heavily impacted by the financial crises and as such have sustained heavy delinquencies affecting the credit rating of the security. Management had applied aggressive default rates to identify if any credit impairment exists, as these bonds were downgraded to below investment grade. The Corporation recorded $86,000$133,000 in principal losses on these bonds for the three months and $219,000 for the six months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, and $33,000$105,000 for the three months and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2010, and expects additional losses in future periods. As such, management determined that an other-than-temporary impairment charge exists and recorded a $9,000cumulative $566,000 write down to the bonds, which represents 0.2114.2 percent of the par amount of $4.3$4.0 million. The new cost basis for these securities has been written down to $3.7$3.5 million.
 
At March 31,June 30, 2011, excess subordination as a percentage of remaining performing collateral for the ALESCO Preferred Funding VI and VII investments were -43.8-44.3 percent and -34.2-36.5 percent, respectively. Excess subordination is the amount of performing collateral above the amount of outstanding collateral underlying each class of the security. The Excess Subordination as a Percent of Remaining Performing Collateral reflects the difference between the performing collateral and the collateral underlying each security divided by the performing collateral. A negative number results when the paying collateral is less than the collateral underlying each class of the security. A low or negative number decreases the likelihood of full repayment of principal and interest accordingly to original contractual terms.
 
During 2011, theThe Corporation did not record other-than-temporary impairment charges relating to equity holdings in bank stocks for the three monthssix month period ended March 31,June 30, 2011 and March 31,or June 30, 2010.
 
The Corporation’s investment portfolio also includes overnight investments that were made into the Reserve Primary Fund (the “Fund”), a money market fund registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. On September 22, 2008, the Fund announced that redemptions of shares of the Fund were suspended pursuant to an SEC order so that an orderly liquidation could be effected for the protection of the Fund’s investors. Through December 31, 2009, the Corporation has received five distributions from the Fund, totaling approximately 92 percent of its outstanding balance, leaving a remaining outstanding balance in the Fund of $2.943 million. On January 29, 2010, as part of the court order liquidation of the Fund, the Corporation received a sixth distribution or $2.446 million, bringing total distributions to date to approximately 99 percent. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation recorded a $364,000, or approximately 1 percent, other-than-temporary impairment charge to earnings relating to a court-ordered liquidation of the Fund. The Corporation’s outstanding carrying balance in the Fund as of January 31, 2010 totaled $133,000. The Corporation’s outstanding carrying balance in the Fund as of December 31, 2010 was zero after recording to earnings approximately $30,000 as partial recovery of the OTTI charge. Future liquidation distributions received by the Corporation, if any, will be recorded to earnings. As of March 31,June 30, 2011 there had been no change in the status of the Fund from December 31, 2010.

For the three months ended March 31, 2011, securities sold from the Corporation’s available-for-sale portfolio amounted to approximately $76.6 million. The gross realized gains on securities sold amounted to approximately $930,000, while the gross realized losses amounted to approximately $69,000 for the period. During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Corporation recorded $9,000 in a variable rate private label CMO and $86,000 on principal losses on a variable rate private label CMO. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, securities sold from the Corporation’s available-for-sale portfolio amounted to approximately $141.5 million. Gross realized gains on securities sold amounted to approximately $1,057,000, while gross realized losses on securities sold amounted to approximately $11,000 for the period. In addition, during the first quarter of 2010, the Corporation recorded other-than temporary impairment charges of $1,109,000 on two pooled trust preferred securities, $281,000 on three variable rate private label CMOs, and $3,000,000 on one trust preferred security.
 
1920

 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
Temporarily Impaired Investments
 
For all other securities, the Corporation does not believe that the unrealized losses, which were comprised of 109102 investment securities as of March 31,June 30, 2011, represent an other-than-temporary impairment. The gross unrealized losses associated with U.S. Treasury and Agency securities and Federal agency obligations, mortgage-backed securities, corporate bonds and tax-exempt securities are not considered to be other than temporary because their unrealized losses are related to changes in interest rates and do not affect the expected cash flows of the underlying collateral or issuer.
 
Factors affecting the market price include credit risk, market risk, interest rates, economic cycles, and liquidity risk. The magnitude of any unrealized loss may be affected by the relative concentration of the Corporation’s investment in any one issuer or industry. The Corporation has established policies to reduce exposure through diversification of concentration of the investment portfolio including limits on concentrations to any one issuer. The Corporation believes the investment portfolio is prudently diversified.
 
The decline in value is related to a change in interest rates and subsequent change in credit spreads required for these issues affecting market price. All issues are performing and are expected to continue to perform in accordance with their respective contractual terms and conditions. Short to intermediate average durations and in certain cases monthly principal payments should reduce further market value exposure to increases in rates. 
 
The Corporation evaluates all securities with unrealized losses quarterly to determine whether the loss is other than temporary. Unrealized losses in the mortgage-backed securities category consist primarily of U.S. agency and private issue collateralized mortgage obligations. Unrealized losses in the corporate debt securities category consist of single issuer corporate trust preferred securities, pooled trust preferred securities and corporate debt securities issued by large financial institutions. The decline in fair value is due in large part to the lack of an active trading market for these securities, changes in market credit spreads and rating agency downgrades. For collateralized mortgage obligations, management reviewed expected cash flows and credit support to determine if it was probable that all principal and interest would be repaid. None of the corporate issuers have defaulted on interest payments. Management concluded that these securities, other than the previously mentioned two Pooled TRUPS and private label CMOs were not other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31,June 30, 2011. Future deterioration in the cash flow on collateralized mortgage obligations or the credit quality of these large financial institution issuers of TRUP debt securities could result in impairment charges in the future.
 
In determining that the securities giving rise to the previously mentioned unrealized losses were not other than temporary, the Corporation evaluated the factors cited above, which the Corporation considers when assessing whether a security is other-than-temporarily impaired. In making these evaluations the Corporation must exercise considerable judgment. Accordingly there can be no assurance that the actual results will not differ from the Corporation’s judgments and that such differences may not require the future recognition of other-than-temporary impairment charges that could have a material affect on the Corporation’s financial position and results of operations. In addition, the value of, and the realization of any loss on, an investment security is subject to numerous risks as cited above.
 
The following tables indicate gross unrealized losses not recognized in income and fair value, aggregated by investment category and the length of time individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:
  June 30, 2011 
  Total  Less Than 12 Months  12 Months or Longer 
  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized 
  Value  Losses  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale: (in thousands) 
Federal agency obligations $23,430  $(262) $7,902  $(104) $15,528  $(158)
Residential mortgage pass-through securities  80,183   (795)  80,183   (795)      
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  10,490   (138)  10,490   (138)      
Trust preferred securities  15,816   (1,691)  3,122   (69)  12,694   (1,622)
Corporate bonds and notes  65,790   (805)  63,829   (767)  1,961   (38)
Collateralized mortgage obligations  2,359   (1,112)        2,359   (1,112)
Equity securities  3,227   (308)  2,957   (43)  270   (265)
Total $201,295  $(5,111) $168,483  $(1,916) $32,812  $(3,195)
                         
Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity:                        
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  9,843   (73)  9,843   (73)      
Total $9,843  $(73) $9,843  $(73) $  $ 
                         
Total temporarily impaired investment securities $211,138  $(5,184) $178,326  $(1,989) $32,812  $(3,195)
 
2021

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

   March 31, 2011 
   Total  Less Than 12 Months  12 Months or Longer 
   
Fair
Value
  
Unrealized
Losses
  
Fair
Value
  
Unrealized
Losses
  
Fair
Value
  
Unrealized
Losses
 
   (in thousands) 
U.S. Treasury and agency securities $  $  $  $  $  $ 
Federal agency obligations  34,003   (496)  27,649   (422)  6,354   (74)
Mortgage-backed securities  163,242   (2,976)  163,242   (2,976)      
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  31,005   (814)  31,005   (814)      
Trust preferred securities  14,317   (1,738)        14,317   (1,739)
Corporate bonds and notes  34,245   (897)  34,245   (896)      
Collateralized mortgage obligations  2,708   (1,040)        2,708   (1,040)
Equity securities  3,211   (324)  2,920   (80)  291   (244)
Total temporarily impaired investment securities $282,731  $(8,285) $259,061  $(5,188) $23,670  $(3,097)

 December 31, 2010  December 31, 2010 
 Total  Less Than 12 Months  12 Months or Longer  Total  Less Than 12 Months  12 Months or Longer 
 
Fair
Value
  
Unrealized
Losses
  
Fair
Value
  
Unrealized
Losses
  
Fair
Value
  
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized 
 (in thousands)  Value  Losses  Value  Losses  Value  Losses 
Investment Securities Available-for-Sale:       (in thousands)       
U.S. Treasury and agency securities $6,995  $(128) $6,995  $(128) $  $  $6,995  $(128) $6,995  $(128) $  $ 
Federal agency obligations  35,799   (641)  32,113   (622)  3,686   (19)  35,799   (641)  32,113   (622)  3,686   (19)
Mortgage-backed securities  166,820   (2,419)  166,820   (2,419)      
Residential mortgage pass-through securities  166,820   (2,419)  166,820   (2,419)      
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  19,699   (1,088)  19,699   (1,088)        19,699   (1,088)  19,699   (1,088)      
Trust preferred securities  16,058   (2,517)        16,058   (2,517)  16,058   (2,517)        16,058   (2,517)
Corporate bonds and notes  61,434   (1,613)  52,985   (1,175)  8,449   (438)  61,434   (1,613)  52,985   (1,175)  8,449   (438)
Collateralized mortgage obligations  2,728   (1,213)        2,728   (1,213)  2,728   (1,213)        2,728   (1,213)
Equity securities  4,653   (382)  3,427   (73)  1,226   (309)  4,653   (382)  3,427   (73)  1,226   (309)
Total temporarily impaired investment securities $314,186  $(10,001) $282,039  $(5,505) $32,147  $(4,496) $314,186  $(10,001) $282,039  $(5,505) $32,147  $(4,496)
 
Investment securities having a carrying value of approximately $128.4$131.4 million and $125.6 million at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits, short-term borrowings, and Federal Home Loan Bank advances and for other purposes required or permitted by law.
 
Note 8.  Fair Value Measurements and Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Corporation’s financial and non-financial instruments; however, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial and non-financial instruments, the fair value estimates herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Corporation could have realized in a sale transaction on the dates indicated. The estimated fair value amounts have been measured as of the respective period-end dates indicated herein and have not been re-evaluated or updated for purposes of these financial statements subsequent to those respective dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial and non-financial instruments subsequent to the respective reporting dates may be different than the amounts reported at each year-end.
 
U.S. GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
 
 ·Level 1: Unadjusted exchange quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.
 
 ·Level 2: Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
 
 ·Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (for example, supported with little or no market activity).
 
An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
 
21

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following information should not be interpreted as an estimate of the fair value of the entire Corporation since a fair value calculation is only provided for a limited portion of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities. Due to a wide range of valuation techniques and the degree of subjectivity used in making the estimates, comparisons between the Corporation’s disclosures and those of other companies may not be meaningful. The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Corporation’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

22


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Investment Securities Available-For-Sale. Available-for-Sale
Where quoted prices are available in an active market, investment securities are classified in Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 inputs include investment securities that have quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flows. Examples of instruments, which would generally be classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy, include municipal bonds and certain agency collateralized mortgage obligations. In certain cases where there is limited
activity in the market for a particular instrument, assumptions must be made to determine their fair value and are classified as Level 3. Due to the inactive condition of the markets amidst the financial crisis, the Corporation treated certain investment securities as Level 3 assets in order to provide more appropriate valuations. For assets in an inactive market, the infrequent trades that do occur are not a true indication of fair value. When measuring fair value, the valuation techniques available under the market approach, income approach and/or cost approach are used. The Corporation’s evaluations are based on market data and the Corporation employs combinations of these approaches for its valuation methods depending on the asset class. In certain cases where there were limited or less transparent information provided by the Corporation’s third-party pricing service, fair value was estimated by the use of secondary pricing services or through the use of non-binding third-party broker quotes.
 
On a quarterly basis, management reviews the pricing information received from the Corporation’s third-party pricing service. This review process includes a comparison to non-binding third-party broker quotes, as well as a review of market-related conditions impacting the information provided by the Corporation’s third-party pricing service.
 
Management primarily identifies investment securities which may have traded in illiquid or inactive markets by identifying instances of a significant decrease in the volume and frequency of trades, relative to historical levels, as well as instances of a significant widening of the bid-ask spread in the brokered markets. Investment securities that are deemed to have been trading in illiquid or inactive markets may require the use of significant unobservable inputs. For example, management may use quoted prices for similar investment securities in the absence of a liquid and active market for the securities being valued. As of March 31,June 30, 2011, management made adjustments to prices provided by the third-party pricing service as a result of illiquid or inactive markets.
 
At March 31,June 30, 2011, the Corporation’s two pooled trust preferred securities and a variable rate CMO were classified as Level 3. Market pricing for these Level 3 securities varied widely from one pricing service to another based on the lack of trading. As such, these securities were not considered to have readily observable market data that was accurate to support a fair value as prescribed by FASB ASC 820-10-05. The Corporation determined that significant adjustments using unobservable inputs are required to determine fair value at the measurement date.
 
The Corporation determined that an income approach valuation technique (present value technique) that maximizes the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs will be equally or more representative of fair value than the market approach valuation technique used at the prior measurement dates. As a result, the Corporation used the discount rate adjustment technique to determine fair value.
 
The fair value as of March 31,June 30, 2011 was determined by discounting the expected cash flows over the life of the security. The discount rate was determined by deriving a discount rate when the markets were considered more active for this type of security. To this estimated discount rate, additions were made for more liquid markets and increased credit risk as well as assessing the risks in the security, such as default risk and severity risk. However, during the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2011 the private label CMO had interruptions of its scheduled principal payments and the Corporation recorded a principal loss of $86,000.$133,000. For the six month ended June 30, 2011, principal loss amounted to $219,000.
 
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
 
For financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis, the fair value measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy used at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:

 
2223

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    
Fair Value Measurements at
Reporting Date Using
     Fair Value Measurements at 
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis March 31, 2011  
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
 (in thousands)     Reporting Date Using 
U.S. Treasury & agency securities $  $  $  $ 
    Quoted       
    Prices in       
    Active  Significant    
    Markets for  Other  Significant 
    Identical  Observable  Unobservable 
    Assets  Inputs  Inputs 
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis June 30, 2011  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
    (in thousands)    
Federal agency obligations  65,491      65,491     $53,622  $  $53,622  $ 
Mortgage backed securities  207,690   3,138   204,552    
Residential mortgage pass-through securities  158,212      158,212    
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  55,994   13,599   42,395      32,834   4,372   28,462    
Trust preferred securities  20,607      20,306   301   20,655      20,319   336 
Collateralized mortgage obligations  2,708         2,708   2,359         2,359 
Corporate bonds and notes  53,023   7,096   45,927      104,631      104,631    
Equity securities  4,863   4,863         4,901   4,901       
Investment securities available-for-sale $410,376  $28,696  $378,671  $3,009  $377,214  $9,273  $365,246  $2,695 
                
     Fair Value Measurements at 
     Reporting Date Using 
     Quoted         
     Prices in         
     Active  Significant     
     Markets for  Other  Significant 
     Identical  Observable  Unobservable 
 December 31,  Assets  Inputs  Inputs 
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis 2010  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
     (in thousands)     
U.S. Treasury & agency securities $6,995  $6,995  $  $ 
Federal agency obligations  68,481      68,481    
Residential mortgage pass-through securities  177,733      177,733    
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  37,225   16,936   20,289    
Trust preferred securities  18,731      18,589   142 
Collateralized mortgage obligations  2,728         2,728 
Corporate bonds and notes  61,434      61,434    
Equity securities  4,753   4,753       
Investment securities available-for-sale $378,080  $28,684  $346,526  $2,870 
 
     
Fair Value Measurements at
Reporting Date Using
 
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis 
December 31,
2010
  
Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
   (in thousands) 
U.S. Treasury & agency securities $6,995  $6,995  $  $ 
Federal agency obligations  68,481      68,481    
Mortgage backed securities  177,733      177,733    
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions  37,225   16,936   20,289    
Trust preferred securities  18,731      18,589   142 
Collateralized mortgage obligations  2,728         2,728 
Corporate bonds and notes  61,434      61,434    
Equity securities  4,753   4,753       
Investment securities available-for-sale $378,080  $28,864  $346,526  $2,870 

The following tables present the changes in investment securities available-for-sale with significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 and 2010.
 
 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
 March 31, 2011  March 31, 2010  June 30, 2011  June 30, 2010 
 (in thousands)     (in thousands)    
Balance at January 1, $2,870  $2,349 
Balance at April 1, $3,009  $8,431 
Transfers into Level 3     8,197    —    
Transfers out of Level 3     (5,174)
Principal interest deferrals  29   28   30   28 
Principal repayments  (184)  (161)  (268)  (314)
Total net losses included in net income     (3,000)
Total net unrealized gains (loss)  294   (1,982)  (76)  3,304 
Balance at March 31 $3,009  $8,431 
Balance at period end, $2,695  $3,275 

24


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
  Six Months Ended 
  June 30, 2011  June 30, 2010 
  (in thousands)    
Balance at January 1, $2,870  $2,349 
Transfers into Level 3     8,197 
Transfers out of Level 3     (5,174)
Principal interest deferrals  59   56 
Principal repayments  (452)  (475)
Total net losses included in net income     (3,000)
Total net unrealized gains  218   1,322 
Balance at period end, $2,695  $3,275 
 
For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, there were no transfers of investment securities available-for-sale into or out of Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 assets.
23

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Loans Held for Sale.  Loans held for sale are required to be measured at the lower of cost or fair value. Under FASB ASC 820-10-05, market value is to represent fair value. Management obtains quotes or bids on all or part of these loans directly from the purchasing financial institutions.  There were no loans held for sale at March 31, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
 
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis
 
For assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, the fair value measurements used at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:
     
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date
Using
 
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis 
March 31,
2011
  
Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
  (in thousands) 
Impaired loans $8,523  $  $  $8,523 

 
    Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 
    Quoted       
    Prices       
    in Active  Significant    
    Markets for  Other  Significant 
    Identical  Observable  Unobservable 
    
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date
Using
     Assets  Inputs  Inputs 
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis 
December 31,
2010
  
Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  June 30, 2011  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
 (in thousands)     (in thousands)    
Impaired loans $4,895  $  $  $4,895  $10,491  $  $  $10,491 
                
     Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using 
     Quoted         
     Prices         
     in Active  Significant     
     Markets for  Other  Significant 
     Identical  Observable  Unobservable 
 December 31,  Assets  Inputs  Inputs 
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis 2010  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3) 
     (in thousands)     
Impaired loans $4,895  $  $  $4,895 
 
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair values of the Corporation’s assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
 
Impaired Loans. The value of an impaired loan is measured based upon the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment, such as residential mortgage loans and installment loans, are specifically excluded from the impaired loan portfolio. The Corporation’s impaired loans are primarily collateral dependent. Impaired loans are individually assessed to determine that each loan’s carrying value is not in excess of the fair value of the related collateral or the present value of the expected future cash flows. Impaired loans at June 30, 2011 were $11,781 with a specific reserve of $1,290 compared to $5,534 with a specific reserve of $639 at December 31, 2010.
 
Other Real Estate Owned.  Other real estate owned (“OREO”) is measured at fair value less costs to sell. The Corporation believes that the fair value component in its valuation follows the provisions of FASB ASC 820-10-05. The fair value of OREO is determined by sales agreements or appraisals by qualified licensed appraisers approved and hired by the Corporation. Costs to sell associated with OREO is based on estimation per the terms and conditions of the sales agreements or appraisals. At March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 the Corporation held no OREO.

25


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
 
FASB ASC 825-10 requires all entities to disclose the estimated fair value of their financial instrument assets and liabilities. For the Corporation, as for most financial institutions, the majority of its assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments as defined in FASB ASC 825-10. Many of the Corporation’s financial instruments, however, lack an available trading market as characterized by a willing buyer and willing seller engaging in an exchange transaction. It is also the Corporation’s general practice and intent to hold its financial instruments to maturity and to not engage in trading or sales activities except for loans held-for-sale and investment securities available-for-sale. Therefore, significant estimations and assumptions, as well as present value calculations, were used by the Corporation for the purposes of this disclosure.
 
24

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Estimated fair values have been determined using the best available data and an estimation methodology suitable for each category of financial instruments. For those loans and deposits with floating interest rates, it is presumed that estimated fair values generally approximate the recorded book balances. The estimation methodologies used, the estimated fair values, and the recorded book balances at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, were as follows:
 
 June 30, 2011  December 31, 2010 
 March 31, 2011  December 31, 2010  Carrying  Fair  Carrying  Fair 
 
Carrying
Amount
  
Fair
Value
  
Carrying
Amount
  
Fair
Value
  Amount  Value  Amount  Value 
 (in thousands)  (in thousands) 
Financial assets:                        
Cash and cash equivalents $80,129  $80,129  $37,497  $37,497  $109,467  $109,467  $37,497  $37,497 
Investment securities available-for-sale  410,376   410,376   378,080   378,080   377,214   377,214   378,080   378,080 
Investment securities held-to-maturity  41,804   42,122       
Net loans  706,505   716,996   699,577   706,309   688,312   690,060   699,577   706,309 
Restricted investment in bank stocks  9,146   9,146   9,596   9,596   9,194   9,194   9,596   9,596 
Accrued interest receivable  4,756   4,756   4,134   4,134   5,229   5,229   4,134   4,134 
                
Financial liabilities:                                
Non interest-bearing deposits $154,910  $154,910  $144,210  $144,210  $158,689  $158,689  $144,210  $144,210 
Interest-bearing deposits  779,736   767,962   716,122   716,887   806,987   807,939   716,122   716,887 
Short-term borrowings  35,917   35,917   41,855   41,855   32,374   32,374   41,855   41,855 
Long-term borrowings  161,000   173,120   171,000   179,570   161,000   170,759   171,000   179,570 
Subordinated debentures  5,155   5,157   5,155   5,157   5,155   5,135   5,155   5,157 
Accrued interest payable  957   957   1,041   1,041   1,011   1,011   1,041   1,041 
 
Financial instruments actively traded in a secondary market have been valued using quoted available market prices. Cash and due from banks, interest-bearing time deposits in other banks, federal funds sold, loans held-for-sale and interest receivable are valued at book value, which approximates fair value.  Financial liability instruments with stated maturities have been valued using a present value discounted cash flow analysis with a discount rate approximating current market for similar liabilities. Interest payable is valued at book value, which approximates fair value. Financial liability instruments with no stated maturities have an estimated fair value equal to both the amount payable on demand and the recorded book balance.
 
The fair value of the Corporation’s investment securities held-to-maturity was primarily measured using information from a third-party pricing service. Quoted prices in active markets were used whenever available. If quoted prices were not available, fair values were measured using pricing models or other valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for credit loss assumptions.
Loans held for sale are required to be measured at the lower of cost or fair value. Under FASB ASC 820-10-05, market value is to represent fair value. Management obtains quotes or bids on all or part of these loans directly from the purchasing financial institutions.  There was $378,000 in loans held for sale at June 30, 2011 and none at December 31, 2010.
The net loan portfolio has been valued using a present value discounted cash flow. The discount rate used in these calculations is the current rate at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings, same remaining maturities, and assumed prepayment risk.
 
The fair value of commitments to originate loans is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness  of the counterparts.counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates. The fair values of letters of credit and lines of credit are based on fees  currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.

26


NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on these estimated fair values.
 
The Corporation’s remaining assets and liabilities, which are not considered financial instruments, have not been valued differently than has been customary with historical cost accounting. No disclosure of the relationship value of the Corporation’s core deposit base is required by FASB ASC 825-10.
 
Fair value estimates are based on existing balance sheet financial instruments, without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Other significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial assets or liabilities include the deferred taxes, premises and equipment and goodwill. In addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in the estimates.
 
Management believes that reasonable comparability between financial institutions may not be likely, due to the wide range of permitted valuation techniques and numerous estimates which must be made, given the absence of active secondary markets for many of the financial instruments. This lack of uniform valuation methodologies also introduces a greater degree of subjectivity to these estimated fair values.

 
25

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 9.  Net Investment in Direct Financing Lease
 
During the second quarter of 2010, the Corporation entered into a lease of its former operations facility under a direct financing lease. The lease has a 15 year term with no renewal options. According to the terms of the lease, the lessee has an obligation to purchase the property underlying the lease in either year seven (7), ten (10) or fifteen (15) at predetermined prices for those years as provided in the lease. The structure of the minimum lease payments and the purchase prices as provided in the lease provide an inducement to the lessee to purchase the property in year seven (7).
 
At March 31,June 30, 2011, the net investment in direct financing lease consists of a minimum lease receivable of $4,987,000$4,948,000 and unearned interest income of $1,269,000,$1,220,000, for a net investment in direct financing lease of $3,718,000.$3,728,000. The net investment in direct financing lease is carried as a component of loans in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of condition.
 
Minimum future lease receipts of the direct financing lease are as follows:
 
For years ending December 31, (in thousands)  (in thousands) 
2011 $117  $78 
2012  166   166 
2013  216   216 
2014  216   216 
2015  224   224 
Thereafter  2,779   2,828 
Total minimum future lease receipts $3,718  $3,728 
 
Note 10.  Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost
 
The Corporation maintained a non-contributory pension plan for substantially all of its employees until September 30, 2007, at which time the Corporation froze its defined benefit pension plan. The following table sets forth the net periodic pension cost of the Corporation’s pension plan for the periods indicated.
 
 
Three Months Ended
 March 31,
  
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
(in thousands) 2011  2010  2011  2010  2011  2010 
         
Interest cost $147  $150  $147  $150  $294  $300 
Net amortization and deferral   (50)  (71)  (50)  (71)  (100)  (141)
Net periodic pension cost  $97  $79  $97  $79  $194  $159 
27

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Contributions
 
The Corporation presently estimates it will contribute $467,000 to its Pension Trust in 2011.
 
The Preservation of Access to Care for Medical Beneficiaries and Pension Relief Act of 2010, signed into law on June 25, 2010, permits single employer and multiple employer defined benefit plan sponsors to elect to extend the plan’s amortization period of a Shortfall Amortization Base over either a nine year period or a fifteen year period, rather than the seven year period required under the Pension Protection Act of 2006.
 
The Bank has elected to apply the Pension Relief Act Fifteen Year amortization of the Shortfall Amortization Base for its 2011 minimum funding requirement. The minimum amount to be funded is $467,000, as noted above, by December 31, 2011with the understanding that fully funding the plan earlier than this date will lower this amount and that funding the plan after this date will increase this amount. As noted, this amount is the minimum required funding amount. The Corporation does have the option of funding above this amount but has contributed the minimum historically.
 
Note 11.  Income Taxes
 
For the quartersix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, the Corporation recorded income tax expense of $1.7$3.6 million, compared with $1.6 milliona $477,000 income tax benefit for the quartersix months ended March 31,June 30, 2010. The effective tax rates for the quarterlysix month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2011 and 2010 were 36.235.6 percent and -122.1-26.2 percent, respectively. The atypical effective tax rate for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2010 was due to the pre-tax loss for the first quarter of 2010 and the recognition of a tax benefit of $853,000 pertaining to prior uncertain tax positions for 2006 and 2007.

26

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
Note 12.  Borrowed Funds
 
Short-Term Borrowings
 
Short-term borrowings, which consist primarily of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances and federal funds purchased, generally have maturities of less than one year. The details of these short-term borrowings are presented in the following table.
 
    March 31, 2011     June 30, 2011 
 (dollars in thousands)  (dollars in thousands) 
Average interest rate:      
At quarter end   0.30%  0.23%
For the quarter  0.27%  0.28%
Average amount outstanding during the quarter $47,287  $36,747 
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end in the quarter $71,732  $43,799 
Amount outstanding at quarter end $35,917  $32,374 
 
Long-Term Borrowings
 
Long-term borrowings, which consist primarily of FHLB advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, totaled $161.0 million and mature within one to eight years. The FHLB advances are secured by pledges of FHLB stock, 1-4 family mortgages and U.S. Government and Federal agency obligations.
 
At March 31,June 30, 2011, FHLB advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase had weighted average interest rates of 3.46 percent and 5.31 percent, respectively.
 
At March 31,June 30, 2011, FHLB advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase are contractually scheduled for repayment as follows:
 
    March 31, 2011     June 30, 2011 
 (in thousands)  (in thousands) 
2013 $5,000  $5,000 
2015  10,000   10,000 
Thereafter  146,000   146,000 
Total $161,000  $161,000 
 
28

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 13.  Subordinated Debentures
 
During 2003, the Corporation formed a statutory business trust, which exists for the exclusive purpose of (i) issuing Trust Securities representing undivided beneficial interests in the assets of the Trust; (ii) investing the gross proceeds of the Trust securities in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (subordinated debentures) of the Corporation; and (iii) engaging in only those activities necessary or incidental thereto. These subordinated debentures and the related income effects are not eliminated in the consolidated financial statements as the statutory business trust is not consolidated in accordance with FASB ASC 810-10. Distributions on the subordinated debentures owned by the subsidiary trusts below have been classified as interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
 
The characteristics of the business trusts and capital securities have not changed with the deconsolidation of the trusts. The capital securities provide an attractive source of funds since they constitute Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes and have the same tax advantages as debt for Federal income tax purposes.
 
The subordinated debentures are redeemable in whole or part prior to maturity on January 23, 2034. The floating interest rate on the subordinated debentures is three-month LIBOR plus 2.85 percent and reprices quarterly. The rate at March 31,June 30, 2011 was 3.153.12 percent.
 
27

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 14.  Stockholders’ Equity
 
On January 12, 2009, the Corporation issued $10 million in nonvoting senior preferred stock to the U.S. Department of Treasury (“Treasury”) under its Capital Purchase Program. As part of the transaction, the Corporation also issued warrants to the Treasury to purchase 173,410 shares of common stock of the Corporation at an exercise price of $8.65 per share. As previously announced, the Corporation's voluntary participation in the Capital Purchase Program represented approximately 50 percent of the dollar amount that the Corporation qualified to receive under the Treasury program. The Corporation believes that its participation in this program strengthened its capital position. The funding will be used to support future loan growth.
 
The Corporation’s senior preferred stock and the warrants issued under the Capital Purchase Program qualify and are accounted for as equity on the consolidated statements of condition. Of the $10 million in issuance proceeds, $9.5 million and $0.5 million were allocated to the senior preferred shares and the warrants, respectively, based upon their estimated relative fair values as of January 12, 2009. The discount of the $0.5 million recorded for the senior preferred shares is being amortized to retained earnings over a five year estimated life of the securities based on the likelihood of their redemption by the Corporation within that timeframe.
In July 2009, the Corporation’s Board of Directors authorized a rights offering of up to approximately $11 million of common stock to existing stockholders. As a result of the rights offering, in October 2009 the Corporation issued 1,137,896 shares of its common stock, at a subscription price of $7.00 per share and for gross proceeds of approximately $8.0 million, to the holders of record of its common stock as of the close of business on September 1, 2009 who exercised their subscription rights. In addition, the Corporation sold 433,532 shares of common stock to standby purchasers for $7.00 per share and for gross proceeds of approximately $3.0 million. The standby purchasers consisted of Lawrence B. Seidman, an existing shareholder and member of the Corporation's Board of Directors, and certain of his affiliates.
 
As a result of the successful completion of the rights offering in October 2009, the number of shares underlying the warrants held by the Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program was reduced to 86,705 shares, or 50 percent of the original 173,410 shares.
 
In September 2010, the Corporation sold an aggregate of 1,715,000 shares of its common stock under its previously filed shelf registration statement which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2010. The Corporation sold 1,430,000 shares of common stock at a price of $7.00 per share, with underwriting discounts and commissions of $0.39 per share, for gross proceeds from this offering of $10,010,000. The Corporation also sold 285,000 shares of common stock directly to certain of its directors at a price of $7.50 per share, for gross proceeds from this offering of $2,137,500. After underwriting discounts and commissions of $557,700 and offering expenses of approximately $200,000 which consisted primarily of legal and accounting fees, net proceeds from both offerings totaled $11,389,800.
 
In April 2009, the Corporations’ Board of Directors voted unanimously to reduce its quarterly common cash dividend from $0.09 per share to $0.03 per share, beginning with the second quarter 2009 dividend declaration.

 
2829

 
 
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 
The purpose of this analysis is to provide the reader with information relevant to understanding and assessing the Corporation’s results of operations for the periods presented herein and financial condition as of March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. In order to fully understand this analysis, the reader is encouraged to review the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this report.
 
Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
 
This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Sections 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that involve inherent risks and uncertainties. This report contains certain forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of Center Bancorp Inc. and its subsidiaries, including statements preceded by, followed by or that include words or phrases such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “trend,” “objective,” “continue,” “remain,” “pattern” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “might,” “can,” “may” or similar expressions. There are a number of important factors that could cause future results to differ materially from historical performance and these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to: (1) competitive pressures among depository institutions may increase significantly; (2) changes in the interest rate environment may reduce interest margins; (3) prepayment speeds, loan origination and sale volumes, charge-offs and loan loss provisions may vary substantially from period to period; (4) general economic conditions may be less favorable than expected; (5) political developments, sovereign debt problems, wars or other hostilities may disrupt or increase volatility in securities markets or other economic conditions; (6) legislative or regulatory changes or actions may adversely affect the businesses in which Center Bancorp is engaged, including, without limitation, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010; (7) changes and trends in the securities markets may adversely impact Center Bancorp; (8) a delayed or incomplete resolution of regulatory issues could adversely impact planning by Center Bancorp; (9) the impact on reputation risk created by the developments discussed above on such matters as business generation and retention, funding and liquidity could be significant; and (10) the outcome of regulatory and legal investigations and proceedings may not be anticipated. Further information on other factors that could affect the financial results of Center Bancorp is included in Item 1A. of Center Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and this Current report on Form 10-Q and in Center Bancorp’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents are available free of charge at the Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov and/or from Center Bancorp.
 
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
The accounting and reporting policies followed by Center Bancorp, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) conform, in all material respects, to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management has made estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the dates of the consolidated statements of condition and for the periods indicated in the statements of operations. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.
 
The Corporation’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) of financial condition and results of operations. The Corporation has identified its policies on the allowance for loan losses, issues relating to other-than-temporary impairment losses in the securities portfolio, the valuation of deferred tax assets, goodwill and the fair value of investment securities to be critical because management must make subjective and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available. Additional information on these policies is provided below.
 
Allowance for Loan Losses and Related Provision
 
The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the consolidated statements of condition.

 
2930

 
 
The evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses includes, among other factors, an analysis of historical loss rates by loan category applied to current loan totals. However, actual loan losses may be higher or lower than historical trends, which vary. Actual losses on specified problem loans, which also are provided for in the evaluation, may vary from estimated loss percentages, which are established based upon a limited number of potential loss classifications.
 
The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Management believes that the current allowance for loan losses will be adequate to absorb loan losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible based on the evaluation of known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. The evaluation takes into consideration such factors as changes in the nature and size of the portfolio, overall portfolio quality, and specific problem loans and current economic conditions which may affect the borrowers’ ability to pay. The evaluation also details historical losses by loan category and the resulting loan loss rates which are projected for current loan total amounts. Loss estimates for specified problem loans are also detailed. All of the factors considered in the analysis of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses may be subject to change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provisions for loan losses may be required that could materially adversely impact earnings in future periods. Additional information can be found in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment of Investment Securities
 
Investment securities are evaluated on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when market conditions warrant such an evaluation, to determine whether a decline in their value is other-than-temporary. FASB ASC 320-10-65 clarifies the interaction of the factors that should be considered when determining whether a debt security is other–than-temporarily impaired. For debt securities, management assesses whether (a) it has the intent to sell the security and (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery. These steps are done before assessing whether the entity will recover the cost basis of the investment. Previously, this assessment required management to assert it has both the intent and the ability to hold a security for a period of time sufficient to allow for anticipated recovery in fair value to avoid recognizing an other-than-temporary impairment. This change does not affect the need to forecast recovery of the value of the security through either cash flows or market price.
 
In instances when a determination is made that an other-than-temporary impairment exists but the investor does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security prior to its anticipated recovery, FASB ASC 320-10-65 changes the presentation and amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in the income statement. The other-than-temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income.
 
Fair Value of Investment Securities
 
FASB ASC 820-10-35 clarifies the application of the provisions of FASB ASC 820-10-05 in an inactive market and how an entity would determine fair value in an inactive market. The Corporation applied the guidance in FASB ASC 820-10-35 when determining fair value for the Corporation’s private label collateralized mortgage obligations, pooled trust preferred securities and single name corporate trust preferred securities. See Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
 
FASB ASC 820-10-65 provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 820-10-05 when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This ASC also includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly.
 
Goodwill
 
The Corporation adopted the provisions of FASB ASC 350-10, which requires that goodwill be reported separate from other intangible assets in the Consolidated Statements of Condition and not be amortized but rather tested for impairment annually or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. No impairment charge was deemed necessary for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 and 2010.
 
 
3031

 
 
Income Taxes
 
The objectives of accounting for income taxes are to recognize the amount of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in an entity’s financial statements or tax returns. Judgment is required in assessing the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements or tax returns.
 
Fluctuations in the actual outcome of these future tax consequences could impact the Corporation’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.  Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements includes additional discussion on the accounting for income taxes.
 
Earnings
 
Net income available to common stockholders for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 amounted to $2,872,000$3,439,000 compared to $136,000$1,868,000 for the comparable three-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2010. The Corporation recorded earnings per diluted common share of $0.18$0.21 for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 as compared with earnings of $0.01$0.13 per diluted common share for the same three months in 2010. Dividends and accretion relating to the preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury reduced earnings by approximately $0.01 per fully diluted common share for both periods. The annualized return on average assets was 0.981.10 percent for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, compared to 0.090.69 percent for three months ended March 31,June 30, 2010. The annualized return on average stockholders’ equity was 11.20 percent for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to 7.60 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
Net income available to common stockholders for the six months ended June 30, 2011 amounted to $6,311,000, compared to net income of $2,004,000 for the comparable six-month period ended June 30, 2010.  Earnings per diluted common share of $0.39 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with earnings of $0.14 per diluted common share for the six months ended June 30, 2010.  Dividends and accretion relating to the preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury reduced earnings by approximately $0.02 per fully diluted common share for both periods.  The annualized return on average assets was 1.04 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to 0.39 percent for six months ended June 30, 2010.  The annualized return on average stockholders’ equity was 10.53 percent for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to 4.36 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
 
Net Interest Income and Margin
 
Net interest income is the difference between the interest earned on the portfolio of earning assets (principally loans and investments) and the interest paid for deposits and borrowings, which support these assets. Net interest income is presented on a fully tax-equivalent basis by adjusting tax-exempt income (primarily interest earned on obligations of state and political subdivisions) by the amount of income tax which would have been paid had the assets been invested in taxable issues. Net interest margin is defined as net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis as a percentage of total average interest-earning assets.
 
The following table presents the components of net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis for the periods indicated.
 
Net Interest Income
(tax-equivalent basis)
 
 Three Months Ended March 31,  Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30, 
       Increase  Percent        Increase  Percent        Increase  Percent 
(dollars in thousands) 2011  2010  (Decrease)  Change  2011  2010  (Decrease)  Change  2011  2010  (Decrease)  Change 
Interest income:                                    
Investment securities $3,552  $3,186  $366   11.5%
Investment securities AFS $3,651  $2,976  $675   22.7% $7,203  $6,189  $1,014   16.4%
Investment securities HTM  349      349      349      349    
Loans, including net costs  9,217   9,368   (151)  (1.6)  8,950   9,419   (469)  (5.0)  18,167   18,787   (620)  (3.3)
Restricted investment in bank stocks, at cost  143   178   (35)  (19.7)  109   122   (13)  (10.7  252   273   (21)  (7.7)
Total interest income  12,912   12,732   180   1.4   13,059   12,517   542   4.3   25,971   25,249   722   2.9 
Interest expense:                                                
Time deposits $100 or more  265   414   (149)  (36.0)  348   340   8   2.4   613   754   (141)  (18.7)
All other deposits  1,002   1,264   (262)  (20.7)  1,072   1,235   (163)  (13.2)  2,074   2,499   (425)  (17.0)
Borrowings  1,655   2,485   (830)  (33.4)  1,665   2,256   (591)  (26.2)  3,320   4,741   (1,421)  (30.0)
Total interest expense  2,922   4,163   (1,241)  (29.8)  3,085   3,831   (746)  (19.5)  6,007   7,994   (1,987)  (24.9)
Net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis  9,990   8,569   1,421   16.6   9,974   8,686   1,288   14.8   19,964   17,255   2,709   15.7 
Tax-equivalent adjustment (1)
  (45)  (60)  15   (25.0)  (181)  (29)  (152)  (524.1)  (226)  (89)  (137)  (153.9)
Net interest income $9,945  $8,509  $1,436   16.9% $9,793  $8,657  $1,136   13.1% $19,738  $17,166  $2,572   15.0%
 

(1)   Computed using a federal income tax rate of 34 percent.
 
32

Net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis increased $1.4$1.3 million or 16.914.8 percent to $9.9$10.0 million for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. For the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, the net interest margin increased 2016 basis points to 3.553.53 percent from 3.353.37 percent during the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2010. For the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, a decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets of 4023 basis points was more than offset by a decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities of 5645 basis points, resulting in an increase in the Corporation’s net interest spread of 1622 basis points for the period. Net interest spread and margin have been impacted by a high level of uninvested excess cash, which accumulated due to strong deposit growth experienced predominantly over the last nine months of 2009.2010. This represented growth in the Corporation’s customer base and enhanced the Corporation’s liquidity position while the Corporation continued to expand its earning assets base.

 
31

Net interest income on a fully tax-equivalent basis increased $2.7 million or 15.7 percent to $20.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the net interest margin increased 17 basis points to 3.54 percent from 3.37 percent during the six months ended June 30, 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease in the average yield on interest-earning assets of 33 basis points was more than offset by a decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities of 50 basis points, resulting in an increase in the Corporation’s net interest spread of 17 basis points for the period.
 
For the three-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2011, interest income on a tax-equivalent basis increased by $180,000$542,000 or 0.164.3 percent compared to the same three-month period in 2010. This increase in interest income was due primarily to a volume increase in investment securities coupled withpartially offset by a decline in yields due to the lower interest rate environment. Average investment securities volume increased during the current three-month period by $100.9$117.0 million, to $400.9$420.2 million, compared to the firstsecond quarter of 2010. The loan portfolio increaseddecreased on average $4.7$17.0 million, to $716.6$701.1 million, from an average of $711.9$718.1 million in the same quarter in 2010, primarily driven by growthreflecting net decreases in commercial loans and commercial real estate related sectors of the loan portfolio. Average loans represented approximately 63.662.0 percent of average interest-earning assets during the firstsecond quarter of 2011 compared to 69.6 percent in the same quarter in 2010.
 
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, interest income on a tax-equivalent basis increased by $722,000 or 2.9 percent from the comparable six-month period in 2010. This increase in interest income was due primarily to higher volume of earning assets of $103.4 million offset in part by lower rates in a lower interest rate environment. Average investment securities volume increased during the current six-month period by $109.0 million, to $410.6 million, compared to the second quarter of 2010. The average loan portfolio decreased $4.1 million, to $708.8 million, from $712.9 million for the same six months in 2010, reflecting net decreases in commercial loans and commercial real estate. Average loans represented approximately 62.8 percent of average interest-earning assets during the first six months of 2011 compared to 69.5 percent for the same six months in 2010.
For the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, interest expense declined $1.2$0.7 million, or 29.819.5 percent from the same period in 2010. The average rate of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 0.560.45 basis points to 1.231.22 percent for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, from 1.791.67 percent for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2010. At the same time, average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $20.7$92.2 million. This increase was primarily in Money Markets, Savings,money markets, savings, time deposits, and Otherother interest-bearing deposits of $50.5$54.6 million, $11.3$20.6 million, $27.1 million and $38.9$43.8 million, respectively, and was partially offset by decreases in Time depositsborrowings of $25.0 million, and in borrowings, which decreased by $55.1$53.9 million.  Since 2009 steps have been taken to improve the Corporation’s net interest margin by allowing the runoff of certain high rate deposits and to position the Corporation for further high-costing cash outflows. The result has been a decline in the Corporation’s average cost of funds and an improvement in net interest spread.  For the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, the Corporation’s net interest spread on a tax-equivalent basis increased to 3.353.40 percent, from 3.193.18 percent for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2010.
33

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, interest expense declined $2.0 million, or 24.9 percent from the same period in 2010. The average rate of interest-bearing liabilities decreased 50 basis points to 1.23 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2011, from 1.73 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2010. At the same time, average interest-bearing liabilities increased by $56.6 million. This increase included an increase in time deposits of $1.2 million and increases in lower costing money market deposits of $52.6 million, savings deposits of $15.9 million and other interest-bearing deposits of $41.4 million, offset by a decrease in borrowings of $54.5 million. The result of this was an improvement in the Corporation’s average cost of funds for the period. As a result of these factors, for the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Corporation’s net interest spread on a tax-equivalent basis increased to 3.37 percent, from 3.20 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
 
The following table quantifies the impact on net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis resulting from changes in average balances and average rates during the three and six month periods presented. Any change in interest income or expense attributable to both changes in volume and changes in rate has been allocated in proportion to the relationship of the absolute dollar amount of change in each category.
 
Analysis of Variance in Net Interest Income Due to Changes in Volume and Rates
 
 
Three Months Ended
March 31, 2011 and 2010
Increase (Decrease) Due to Change In:
  
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010
Increase (Decrease) Due to Change In:
  
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010
Increase (Decrease) Due to Change In:
 
(tax-equivalent basis, in thousands) 
Average
Volume
  
Average
Rate
  
Net
Change
  
Average
Volume
  
Average
Rate
  
Net
Change
  
Average
Volume
  
Average
Rate
  
Net
Change
 
         
Interest-earning assets:                           
Investment securities:                           
Available for sale                  
Taxable $731  $(235) $496  $1,692  $(813) $879 
Tax-exempt  172   7   179   132   3   135 
Held to maturity                        
Taxable $960  $(550) $410      80   80      80   80 
Tax-exempt  (35)  (9)  (44)     269   269      269   269 
Total investment securities  925   (559)  366   903   121   1,024   1,824   (461)  1,363 
Loans  62   (213)  (151)  (220)  (249)  (469)  (30)  (590)  (620)
Restricted investment in bank stocks  (23)  (12)  (35)  (18)  5   (13)  (39)  18   (21)
Total interest-earning assets  964   (784)  180   665   (123)  542   1,755   (1,033)  722 
                                    
Interest-bearing liabilities:                                    
Money market deposits  83   (94)  (11)  90   (103)  (13)  173   (197)  (24)
Savings deposits  21   (102)  (81)  36   (87)  (51)  58   (190)  (132)
Time deposits  (84)  (234)  (318)  78   (162)  (84)  9   (411)  (402)
Other interest-bearing deposits  63   (64)  (1)  72   (79)  (7)  136   (144)  (8)
Total interest-bearing deposits  83   (494)  (411)  276   (431)  (155)  376   (942)  (566)
Borrowings and subordinated debentures  (465)  (365)  (830)  (451)  (140)  (591)  (915)  (506)  (1,421)
Total interest-bearing liabilities  (382)  (859)  (1,241)  (175)  (571)  (746)  (539)  (1,448)  (1,987)
Change in net interest income $1,346  $75  $1,421  $840  $448  $1,288  $2,294  $415  $2,709 

 
3234

 
 
The following tables, “Average Statements of Condition with Interest and Average Rates”, present for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Corporation’s average assets, liabilities and stockholders’ equity. The Corporation’s net interest income, net interest spread and net interest margin are also reflected.
 
Average Statements of Condition with Interest and Average Rates
 
 Three Months Ended March 31,  Three Months Ended June 30, 
 2011  2010  2011  2010 
(tax-equivalent basis) 
Average
Balance
  
Interest
Income/
Expense
  
Average
Rate
  
Average
Balance
  
Interest
Income/
Expense
  
Average
Rate
  
Average
Balance
  
Interest
Income/
Expense
  
Average
Rate
  
Average
Balance
  
Interest
Income/
Expense
  
Average
Rate
 
 (dollars in thousands)  (dollars in thousands) 
Assets                                    
Interest-earning assets:                                    
Investment securities (1):
                                    
Available for sale                  
Taxable $376,947  $3,387   3.59% $296,929  $2,891   3.89%
Tax-exempt  18,066   264   5.85   6,270   85   5.42 
Held to maturity                        
Taxable $391,022  $3,419   3.50% $287,547  $3,009   4.18%  6,461   80   4.95          
Tax-exempt  9,833   133   5.40   12,407   177   5.70   18,711   269   5.75          
Total investment securities  400,855   3,552   3.54   299,954   3,186   4.25   420,185   4,000   3.81   303,199   2,976   3.93 
Loans (2)
  716,568   9,217   5.15   711,860   9,368   5.26   701,056   8,950   5.11   718,078   9,419   5.25 
Restricted investment in bank stocks  9,158   143   6.22   10,571   178   6.74   9,191   109   4.74   10,706   122   4.56 
Total interest-earning assets  1,126,581   12,912   4.58   1,022,385   12,732   4.98   1,130,432   13,059   4.62   1,031,983   12,517   4.85 
Non interest-earning assets:                                                
Cash and due from banks  34,074           79,958           102,805           71,335         
Bank-owned life insurance  28,010           26,414           28,274           26,680         
Intangible assets  16,952           17,020           16,936           17,001         
Other assets  32,653           41,316           32,738           35,826         
Allowance for loan losses  (9,139)          (8,378)          (9,601)          (8,362)        
Total non interest-earning assets  102,550           156,330           171,152           142,480         
Total assets $1,229,131          $1,178,715          $1,301,584          $1,174,463         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity                                                
Interest-bearing liabilities:                                                
Money market deposits $166,875  $225   0.54% $116,358  $236   0.81% $180,468  $244   0.54% $125,851  $257   0.82%
Savings deposits  173,010   237   0.55   161,748   318   0.79   182,455   263   0.58   161,901   314   0.78 
Time deposits  203,948   523   1.02   228,903   841   1.47   241,816   619   1.02   214,669   703   1.31 
Other interest-bearing deposits  193,363   282   0.58   154,426   283   0.73   201,013   294   0.59   157,187   301   0.77 
Total interest-bearing deposits  737,196   1,267   0.69   661,435   1,678   1.01   805,752   1,420   0.70   659,608   1,575   0.96 
Short-term and long-term borrowings  208,509   1,629   3.12   263,620   2,446   3.71   197,747   1,639   3.32   251,699   2,216   3.52 
Subordinated debentures  5,155   26   2.32   5,155   39   3.03   5,155   26   2.02   5,155   40   3.10 
Total interest-bearing liabilities  950,860   2,922   1.23   930,210   4,163   1.79   1,008,654   3,085   1.22   916,462   3,831   1.67 
Non interest-bearing liabilities:                                                
Demand deposits  152,074           135,552           157,002           139,759         
Other liabilities  3,705           8,315           7,537           12,295         
Total non interest-bearing liabilities  155,779           143,869           164,539           152,054         
Stockholders’ equity  122,492           104,636           128,391           105,947         
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,229,131          $1,178,715          $1,301,584          $1,174,463         
Net interest income (tax-equivalent basis)      9,990           8,569           9,974           8,686     
Net interest spread          3.35%          3.19%          3.40%          3.18%
Net interest margin (3)
          3.55%          3.35%          3.53%          3.37%
Tax-equivalent adjustment (4)
      (45)          (60)          (181)          (29)    
Net interest income     $9,945          $8,509          $9,793          $8,657     
 

(1)Average balances are based on amortized cost.
(2)Average balances include loans on non-accrual status.
(3)Represents net interest income as a percentage of total average interest-earning assets.
(4)Computed using a federal income tax rate of 34 percent.

 
3335

Average Statements of Condition with Interest and Average Rates
  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2011  2010 
(tax-equivalent basis) 
Average
Balance
  
Interest
Income/
Expense
  
Average
Rate
  
Average
Balance
  
Interest
Income/
Expense
  
Average
Rate
 
  (dollars in thousands) 
Assets                  
Interest-earning assets:                  
Investment securities (1):
                  
Available for sale                  
Taxable $383,946  $6,806   3.55% $292,264  $5,927   4.06%
Tax-exempt  13,972   397   5.68   9,322   262   5.63 
Held to maturity                        
Taxable  3,249   80   4.92          
Tax-exempt  9,407   269   5.72          
     Total investment securities  410,574   7,552   3.68   301,586   6,189   4.10 
Loans (2)
  708,769   18,167   5.13   712,914   18,787   5.27 
Restricted investment in bank stocks  9,174   252   5.49   10,639   273   5.13 
     Total interest-earning assets  1,128,517   25,971   4.60   1,025,139   25,249   4.93 
Non interest-earning assets:                        
Cash and due from banks  68,629           75,623         
Bank-owned life insurance  28,143           26,548         
Intangible assets  16,944           17,010         
Other assets  32,695           40,620         
Allowance for loan losses  (9,371)          (8,363)        
     Total non interest-earning assets  137,040           151,438         
     Total assets $1,265,557          $1,176,577         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity                        
Interest-bearing liabilities:                        
Money market deposits $173,710  $469   0.54% $121,131  $493   0.81%
Savings deposits  177,758   500   0.56   161,825   632   0.78 
Time deposits  222,987   1,142   1.02   221,746   1,544   1.39 
Other interest-bearing deposits  197,208   576   0.58   155,814   584   0.75 
     Total interest-bearing deposits  771,663   2,687   0.70   660,516   3,253   0.98 
Short-term and long-term borrowings  203,098   3,268   3.22   257,626   4,662   3.62 
Subordinated debentures  5,155   52   2.02   5,155   79   3.06 
     Total interest-bearing liabilities  979,916   6,007   1.23   923,297   7,994   1.73 
Non interest-bearing liabilities:                        
Demand deposits  154,552           137,667         
Other liabilities  5,631           10,318         
      Total non interest-bearing liabilities  160,183           147,985         
Stockholders’ equity  125,458           105,295         
     Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,265,557          $1,176,577         
Net interest income (tax-equivalent basis)      19,964           17,255     
Net interest spread          3.37%          3.20%
Net interest margin (3)
          3.54%          3.37%
Tax-equivalent adjustment (4)
      (226)          (89)    
Net interest income     $19,738          $17,166     

(1)Average balances are based on amortized cost.
(2)Average balances include loans on non-accrual status.
(3)Represents net interest income as a percentage of total average interest-earning assets.
(4) Computed using a federal income tax rate of 34 percent.
36

 
 
Investment Portfolio
 
At March 31,June 30, 2011, the principal components of the investment securities portfolio were U.S. Government agency obligations, federal agency obligations including mortgage-backed securities, obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions, corporate bonds and notes, and other debt and equity securities including trust preferred securities.
During the six months ended June 30, 2011, the Corporation reclassified at fair value approximately $36.0 million in available-for-sale investment securities to the held-to-maturity category. The related after-tax gains of approximately $218,000 remained in accumulated other comprehensive income and will be amortized over the remaining life of the securities as an adjustment of yield, offsetting the related amortization of the premium or accretion of the discount on the transferred securities. No gains or losses were recognized at the time of reclassification. Management considers the held-to-maturity classification of these investment securities to be appropriate as the Corporation has the positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity.
 
At one point, the Corporation’s investment securities portfolio also included overnight investments that were made into the Reserve Primary Fund (the “Fund”), a money market fund registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. On September 22, 2008, the Fund announced that redemptions of shares of the Fund were suspended pursuant to an SEC order so that an orderly liquidation could be effected for the protection of the Fund’s investors. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Corporation recorded a $364,000 other-than-temporary impairment charge to earnings relating to this court ordered liquidation. Through March 31,June 30, 2011, the Corporation has received seven distributions from the Fund’s liquidation which resulted in reducing the carrying balance in the Fund to zero and the recording to earnings of approximately $30,000 as partial recovery of the OTTI charge. Future liquidation distributions received by the Corporation, if any, will be recorded to earnings.
 
During the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, approximately $76.6$158.2 million in investment securities were sold from the available-for-sale portfolio. The cash flow from the sale of investment securities was primarily used to fund loans and purchase new securities. The Corporation’s sales from its available-for-sale investment portfolio were made in the ordinary course of business.
 
For the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, average investment securities increased $100.9$117.0 million to approximately $400.9$420.2 million, or 35.637.2 percent of average interest-earning assets, from $300.0$303.2 million on average, or 29.329.4 percent of average interest-earning assets, for the comparable period in 2010. The Corporation has a continuing strategy to maintain the overall size of the investment securities portfolio, as a percentage of interest-earning assets, at a lower level with a focus instead on loan growth.
 
During the three-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2011, the volume-related factors applicable to the investment portfolio increased interest income by approximately $925,000$903,000 while rate-related changes resulted in a decreasean increase in interest income of approximately $559,000$121,000 from the same period in 2010. The tax-equivalent yield on investments decreased by 7112 basis points to 3.543.81 percent from a yield of 4.253.93 percent during the comparable period in 2010. A portion of the decline in tax-equivalent yield is attributable to a decrease of $2.630 basis points on taxable securities during the period.
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, the volume-related factors applicable to the investment portfolio increased interest income by approximately $1.8 million while rate-related changes resulted in a decrease in interest income of approximately $0.5 million from the same period in 2010. The average tax-equivalent yield on average,investments decreased by 42 basis points to 3.68 percent from a yield of 4.10 percent during the comparable period in tax-exempt2010. A portion of the decline in tax-equivalent yield is attributable to a decrease of 51 basis points on taxable securities during the period.
 
For the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, the Corporation recorded $9,000$18,000 in other-than-temporary impairment charges and principal losses of $86,000$219,000 on a private label collateralized mortgage obligation.obligation and as such the Corporation expects there may be additional losses. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Corporation recorded a $5.1 million other-than-temporary impairment charge on four bond holdings in the investment securities portfolio. See Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
 
At March 31,June 30, 2011, net unrealized losses on investment securities available-for-sale, which is carried as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss and included in stockholders’ equity, net of tax, amounted to $4.0$1.7 million as compared with net unrealized losses of $5.3 million at December 31, 2010. At June 30, 2011, net unrealized gains on investment securities held to maturity, transferred from securities available-for-sale, which is carried as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss and included in stockholders’ equity, net of tax, amounted to $208,000. The gross unrealized losses associated with U.S. Treasury and Agency securities and Federal agency obligations, mortgage-backed securities, corporate bonds and tax-exempt securities are not considered to be other than temporary because their unrealized losses are related to changes in interest rates and do not affect the expected cash flows of the underlying collateral or issuer.
37

 
Loan Portfolio
 
Lending is one of the Corporation’s primary business activities. The Corporation’s loan portfolio consists of commercial, residential and retail loans, serving the diverse customer base in its market area. The composition of the Corporation’s portfolio continues to change due to the local economy. Factors such as the economic climate, interest rates, real estate values and employment all contribute to these changes. Growth is generated through business development efforts, repeat customer requests for new financings, penetration into existing markets and entry into new markets.
 
The Corporation seeks to create growth in commercial lending by offering products and competitive pricing and by capitalizing on the positive trends in its market area. Products offered are designed to meet the financial requirements of the Corporation’s customers. It is the objective of the Corporation’s credit policies to diversify the commercial loan portfolio to limit concentrations in any single industry.

34

 
At March 31,June 30, 2011, total loans amounted to $716.1$698.1 million, an increasea decrease of $7.7$10.3 million or 1.11.5 percent as compared to December 31, 2010. GrowthFor the six month period ended June 30, 2011 growth of $20.3$5.3 million in the commercial and industrial and commercial real estate portfoliosportfolio was partially offset by decreases of $12.5$15.6 million, primarily in the residential and construction loan portfolios. Total gross loans recorded in the quarter included $41.7$50.5 million of new loans and $16.4 million in advances, partially offset by payoffs and principal payments of $50.4$68.4 million.
 
At March 31,June 30, 2011, the Corporation had $12.2$10.7 million in outstanding loan commitments which are expected to fund over the next 90 days.
 
Average total loans increased $4.7decreased $17.0 million or 0.662.4 percent for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 as compared to the same period in 2010, while the average yield on loans decreased by 1114 basis points as compared with the same period in 2010. The decrease in the average yield on loans was primarily the result of lower market interest rates on the repricing of existing loans and the origination of new loans. The increasedecrease in average total loan volume was due primarily to unanticipated paydown by borrower which could not be offset by increased customer activity and new lending relationships. The volume-related factors during the period contributed increaseddecreased interest income of $62,000,$220,000, while the rate-related changes decreased interest income by $213,000.$249,000.
Average total loans for the six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased $4.1 million or 0.6 percent as compared to the same period in 2010.  The average yield on loans decreased 14 basis points in the current six-month period compared to the same period in 2010.
 
Allowance for Loan Losses and Related Provision
 
The purpose of the allowance for loan losses (the “allowance”) is to absorb the impact of losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Additions to the allowance are made through provisions charged against current operations and through recoveries made on loans previously charged-off. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at an amount considered adequate by management to provide for probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio based upon a periodic evaluation of the portfolio’s risk characteristics. In establishing an appropriate allowance, an assessment of the individual borrowers, a determination of the value of the underlying collateral, a review of historical loss experience and an analysis of the levels and trends of loan categories, delinquencies and problem loans are considered. Such factors as the level and trend of interest rates and current economic conditions and peer group statistics are also reviewed. Given the extraordinary economic volatility impacting national, regional and local markets, the Corporation’s analysis of its allowance for loan losses takes into consideration the potential impact that current trends may have on the Corporation’s borrower base.
 
Although management uses the best information available, the level of the allowance for loan losses remains an estimate, which is subject to significant judgment and short-term change. Various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the Corporation to increase the allowance based on their analysis of information available to them at the time of their examination. Furthermore, the majority of the Corporation’s loans are secured by real estate in the State of New Jersey. Future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary due to economic factors impacting New Jersey real estate and the economy in general, as well as operating, regulatory and other conditions beyond the Corporation’s control.
 
38

At March 31,June 30, 2011, the level of the allowance was $9,591,000$9,836,000 as compared to $8,867,000 at December 31, 2010. Provisions to the allowance for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2011 totaled $878,000$1,128,000 compared to $940,000$1,721,000 for the same period in 2010. Net charge-offs were $154,000$5,000 and $1,512,000$325,000 for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.respectively, bringing the Corporation’s net charge-offs to $159,000 for the first six months of 2011 compared to $1,837,000 for the same period in 2010. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans amounted to 1.341.41 percent and 1.25 percent at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
 
The level of the allowance for the respective periods of 2011 and 2010 reflects the credit quality within the loan portfolio, the loan volume recorded during the periods, the changing composition of the commercial and residential real estate loan portfolios and other related factors. In management’s view, the level of the allowance at March 31,June 30, 2011 is adequate to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management’s judgment regarding the adequacy of the allowance constitutes a “Forward-Looking Statement” under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from management’s analysis, based principally upon the factors considered by management in establishing the allowance.

 
35

Changes in the allowance for loan losses are presented in the following table for the periods indicated.
 
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 2011  2010  2011  2010 
 (dollars in thousands)  (dollars in thousands) 
Average loans for the period $716,568  $711,860  $708,769  $712,914 
Total loans at end of period  716,096   713,906   698,148   722,527 
                
Analysis of the Allowance for Loan Losses:                
Balancebeginning of year
 $8,867  $8,711 
Balance—beginning of year $8,867  $8,711 
Charge-offs:                
Commercial loans  (165)  (1,145)
Commercial and industrial loans  (185)  (1,172)
Residential mortgage loans  (23)  (362)  (23)  (645)  
Installment loans  (3)  (14)  (7)  (33)
Total charge-offs  (191)  (1,521)  (215)  (1,850)
Recoveries:                
Commercial loans  35   5 
Commercial and industrial loans  35   8 
Commercial real estate loans  15    
Residential mortgage loans     1   2   1 
Installment loans  2   3   4   4 
Total recoveries  37   9   56   13 
Net charge-offs  (154)  (1,512)  (159)  (1,837)
Provision for loan losses  878   940   1,128   1,721 
Balanceend of period
 $9,591  $8,139 
Balance—end of period $9,836  $8,595 
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans during the period (1)
  0.09%  0.85%  0.04%  0.52%
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of total loans  1.34%  1.14%  1.41%  1.19%


(1)
(1)Annualized.
 
Asset Quality
 
The Corporation manages asset quality and credit risk by maintaining diversification in its loan portfolio and through review processes that include analysis of credit requests and ongoing examination of outstanding loans, delinquencies, and potential problem loans, with particular attention to portfolio dynamics and mix. The Corporation strives to identify loans experiencing difficulty early enough to correct the problems, to record charge-offs promptly based on realistic assessments of current collateral values and cash flows, and to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses at all times.
39

 
It is generally the Corporation’s policy to discontinue interest accruals once a loan is past due as to interest or principal payments for a period of ninety days. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, interest accruals cease and uncollected accrued interest is reversed and charged against current income. Payments received on non-accrual loans are applied against principal. A loan may be restored to an accruing basis when it again becomes well-secured, all past due amounts have been collected and the borrower continues to make payments for the next six months on a timely basis. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more are generally well-secured and in the process of collection.
 
Non-Performing Assets and Troubled Debt Restructured Loans
 
Non-performing loans include non-accrual loans and accruing loans past due 90 days or more. Non-accrual loans represent loans on which interest accruals have been suspended. In general, it is the policy of management to consider the charge-off of loans at the point they become past due in excess of 90 days, with the exception of loans that are both well-secured and in the process of collection. Non-performing assets include non-performing loans and other real estate owned. Troubled debt restructured loans represent loans on which a concession was granted to a borrower, such as a reduction in interest rate which is lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risks, or modified repayment terms, and are performing under the restructured terms.
 
The following table sets forth, as of the dates indicated, the amount of the Corporation’s non-accrual loans, accruing loans past due 90 days or more, other real estate owned and troubled debt restructured loans.

 
36

 
March 31,
2011
  
December 31,
2010
  
June 30,
2011
  
December 31,
2010
 
 (in thousands)  (in thousands) 
Non-accrual loans $12,336  $11,174  $10,137  $11,174 
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more  687   714   1,013   714 
Total non-performing loans  13,023   11,888   11,150   11,888 
Other non-performing assets  327       327    
Total non-performing assets $13,350  $11,888  $11,477  $11,888 
Troubled debt restructured loans $7,035  $7,035  $8,223  $7,035 
 
The increase of $1.5Non-performing assets decreased by $0.4 million in non-performing assets at March 31,June 30, 2011 from December 31, 20102010.  The decrease was primarily attributable toaccomplished notwithstanding the addition of 3several new residential mortgages and one construction loan in the amount of $1.8loans totaling approximately $1.9 million, and commercial loans totaling approximately $1.6 million into non-performing status. This was more than offset by decreases from pay-downs of $2.4 million, and minor net charge-offs of $159,000 of existing loans and the purchasetransfer to performing troubled debt restructured from non-accrual status of a commercial mortgage of $1.3 million. Other non-performing assets consist of $327,000 in tax lien certificates and was partially offset by charge-offs of $191,000 and payments of approximately $400,000.
 
Other real estate owned at March 31,June 30, 2011 amounted to zero. The Corporation held no other real estate owned at December 31, 2010.
 
Troubled debt restructured loans totaled $7,035,000$8,223,000 at March 31,June 30, 2011 and $ 7,035,000 at December 31, 2010. Troubled debt restructured loans at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were all performing according to the restructured terms.
 
Overall credit quality in the Bank’s loan portfolio at March 31,June 30, 2011 remained relatively strong. Other known “potential problem loans” (as defined by SEC regulations), some of which are non-performing loans and are identifiedincluded in the table above, as of March 31,June 30, 2011 have been identified and internally risk-rated as assets specially mentioned or substandard. Such loans amounted to $51.3$56.8 million and $38.4 million at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. These loans are considered potential problem loans due to a variety of changing conditions affecting the credits, including general economic conditions and/or conditions applicable to the specific borrowers. All such loans are currently performing. The Corporation has no foreign loans.
 
At March 31,June 30, 2011, other than the loans set forth above, the Corporation is not aware of any loans which present serious doubts as to the ability of its borrowers to comply with present loan repayment terms and which are expected to fall into one of the categories set forth in the tables or descriptions above.

40

Other Income
 
The following table presents the principal categories of other income for the periods indicated.
 
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
       Increase  Percent     Increase Percent     Increase  Percent
(dollars in thousands) 2011  2010  (Decrease)  Change 2011 2010 (Decrease) Change 2011 2010 (Decrease)  Change
                
Service charges, commissions and fees $449  $430  $19   4.4% $461  $459  $2   0.4% $910  $889  $21   2.4%
Annuities and insurance commissions  6   93   (87)  (93.5)
Annuities and insurance  33   23   10   43.5   39   116   (77)  (66.4)
Bank-owned life insurance  260   264   (4)  (1.5)  261   264   (3)  (1.1)  521   528   (7)  (1.3)
Net investment securities gains (losses)  766   (3,344)  4,110   122.9   801   657   144   (21.9)  1,567   (2,687  4,254   (158.3)
All other  116   108   8   7.4   176   79   97   122.8   292   187   105   56.1 
Total other income (loss) $1,597  $(2,449) $4,046   165.2%
Total other income (charges) $1,732  $1,482  $250   16.9% $3,329  $(967) $4,296   (444.3)%
 
For the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, total other income amounted to $1.6$1.73 million, compared to a net chargetotal other income of $2.4$1.48 million for the same period in 2010. The increase of $4.0 million$250,000 for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 was primarily as a result of net investment securities gains of $766,000$801,000 compared to net investment lossesgains of $3.3 million$657,000 for the same period last year. Net investment securities gains in the firstsecond quarter of 2011 included $861,000$943,000 in net gains on the sale of investment securities, reduced by $95,000$142,000 in other-than-temporary impairment charges. Excluding net investment securities gains, the Corporation recorded total other income of $831,000$931,000 for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, compared to $895,000$825,000 for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2010, a decreasean increase of $64,000$106,000 or 7.212.8 percent, which was primarily in Annuitiesthe Other category in the 2010 period, which increased $97,000 resulting from higher loan fees and an increase in annuities and insurance commissions of $87,000 partially offset by$10,000.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, total other income increased $4.3 million compared to the same period in 2010, primarily as a result of net investment securities gains and losses including other-than-temporary impairment charges. Excluding net investment securities gains and losses, the Corporation recorded other income of $1.76 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $1.72 million for the comparable period in 2010, an increase of $40,000 or 2.3%. Increases in other income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were recorded primarily in service charges on depositdeposits accounts, of $19,000.

37

loan fees and income.
 
Other Expense
 
The following table presents the principal categories of other expense for the periods indicated.
 
 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
  
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
       Increase  Percent        Increase  Percent        Increase  Percent 
(dollars in thousands) 2011  2010  (Decrease)  Change  2011  2010  (Decrease)  Change  2011  2010  (Decrease)  Change 
                        
Salaries and employee benefits $2,867  $2,657  $210   7.9% $2,903  $2,727  $176   6.5% $5,770  $5,384  $386   7.2%
Occupancy and equipment  866   889   (23)  (2.6)  667   734   (67)  (9.1)  1,533   1,623   (90)  (5.5)
FDIC insurance  528   618   (90)  (14.6)  528   458   70   15.3   1,056   1,076   (20)  (1.9)
Professional and consulting  241   274   (33)  (12.0)  245   422   (177)  (41.9)  486   696   (210)  (30.2)
Stationery and printing  101   84   17   20.2   99   90   9   10   200   174   26   14.9 
Marketing and advertising  21   93   (72)  (77.4)  65   105   (40)  (38.1)  86   197   (111)  (56.3)
Computer expense  339   340   (1)  (0.3)  350   340   10   2.9   689   680   9   1.3 
Other real estate owned expense  (1)     (1)        43   (43)  100.0   (1)  43   (44)  (102.3)
Loss on fixed asset net     (10)  10   100.0 
Repurchase agreement termination fee     594   (594)  (100.0)
All other  973   853   120   14.1   900   1,349   (449)  (33.3)  1,873   2,787   (914)  (32.8)
Total other expense $5,935  $6,392  $(457)  (7.1)% $5,757  $6,268  $(511)  (8.2)% $11,692  $12,660  $(968)  (7.6)%
41

 
For the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, total other expense decreased $457,000,$511,000, or 7.18.2 percent, from the comparable three months ended March 31,June 30, 2010. This was primarily attributable to a decrease in a one time cost of $594,000 relative to the termination of a structured repurchase agreement in 2010, and lower occupancy and equipment expense and professional and consulting expense partially offset by increases in salaries and employee benefits expense.expense and FDIC insurance.  For the six months ended June 30, 2010, total other expense decreased $968,000, or 7.6 percent from the same period in 2010.
 
Salaries and employee benefits expense for the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2011 increased $210,000$176,000 or 7.96.5 percent over the comparable period in the prior year. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, salaries and employee benefits expense increased $386,000, or 7.2 percent. The increase was primarily due to additions to staff, merit increases and one time severance payments. Full-time equivalent staffing levels were 165167 at March 31,June 30, 2011, 159 at December 31, 2010 and 162163 at March 31,June 30, 2010.
 
Occupancy and equipment expense for the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2011 decreased $23,000,$67,000, or 2.69.1 percent, from the comparable three-month period in 2010. The decrease for the quarter was primarily attributable to expense reductions pertaining to the Corporation’s former operations facility that resulted from vacating and leasing the facility earlier in 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, occupancy and equipment expense decreased $90,000 or 5.5 percent from the same period last year. The decrease was primarily attributable to reductions of $68,000$103,000 in depreciation expense $42,000 in building and equipment maintenance expense and $18,000$50,000 in real estate taxes, largely associated with the Corporation’s former operations facility. These decreases were offset by an increase of $65,000 in building and equipment maintenance expense and higher weather related maintenance cost in 2011.
 
FDIC insurance expense decreased $90,000increased $70,000 or 14.6%15.3% for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, FDIC insurance expense decreased $20,000 compared to the same period in 2010.
 
 Professional and consulting expense for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 decreased $33,000$177,000 or 12.041.9 percent compared to the comparable quarter of 2010. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 professional and consulting expense decreased $210,000, or 30.2 percent, from the comparable period in 2010.  Expense decreases primarily occurred in legal fees related to the termination of a structured repurchase agreement in 2010.
 
Marketing and advertising expense for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 decreased $72,000$40,000 or 77.438.1 percent, from the comparable period in 2010, primarily due to a reduction in print media costs. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, marketing and advertising expense decreased $111,000, or 56.3 percent compared to the same period in 2010.
 
All other expense for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 increased $120,000decreased $449,000 compared to the same quarter of 2010.  The increaseThis decrease was primarily due to real estate taxesa loss on fixed assets of $50,000 related$437,000 in connection with the Corporation engaging in a direct financing lease of its former operations facility in 2010. Other expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 decreased $914,000, or 32.8 percent compared to the same period in 2010. The decrease was primarily due to a loanone-time termination fee in non accrual status and deposit and lending related fee expensesthe first quarter of $34,000 and $13,000, respectively.2010 of $594,000 on a structured securities repurchase agreement, the $437,000 loss on fixed assets which was recorded in the second quarter of 2010.
 
Provision for Income Taxes
 
For the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2011, the Corporation recorded income tax expense of $1.7$1.9 million, compared with $1.6$1.1 million income tax benefitexpense for the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2010. The effective tax rates for the quarterly periods ended March 31,June 30, 2011 and 2010 were 36.235.0 percent and -122.134.8 percent, respectively.
For the six months ended June 30, 2011, income tax expense amounted to $3.6 million compared with a $477,000 income tax benefit for the comparable period in 2010. The effective tax rates for the respective six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were 35.6 percent and -26.2 percent, respectively. The atypical effective tax rate for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2010 was due to the pre-tax loss for the quarter and the recognition of a tax benefit of $853,000 pertaining to prior uncertain tax positions for 2006 and 2007.

38

 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
Note 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements discusses the expected impact of accounting pronouncements recently issued or proposed but not yet required to be adopted.
42

 
Asset and Liability Management
 
Asset and Liability management encompasses an analysis of market risk, the control of interest rate risk (interest sensitivity management) and the ongoing maintenance and planning of liquidity and capital. The composition of the Corporation’s statement of condition is planned and monitored by the Asset and Liability Committee (“ALCO”). In general, management’s objective is to optimize net interest income and minimize market risk and interest rate risk by monitoring the components of the statement of condition and the interaction of interest rates.
 
Short-term interest rate exposure analysis is supplemented with an interest sensitivity gap model. The Corporation utilizes interest sensitivity analysis to measure the responsiveness of net interest income to changes in interest rate levels. Interest rate risk arises when an earning asset matures or when its interest rate changes in a time period different than that of a supporting interest-bearing liability, or when an interest-bearing liability matures or when its interest rate changes in a time period different than that of an earning asset that it supports. While the Corporation matches only a small portion of specific assets and liabilities, total earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities are grouped to determine the overall interest rate risk within a number of specific time frames. The difference between interest-sensitive assets and interest-sensitive liabilities is referred to as the interest sensitivity gap. At any given point in time, the Corporation may be in an asset-sensitive position, whereby its interest-sensitive assets exceed its interest-sensitive liabilities, or in a liability-sensitive position, whereby its interest-sensitive liabilities exceed its interest-sensitive assets, depending in part on management’s judgment as to projected interest rate trends.
 
The Corporation’s interest rate sensitivity position in each time frame may be expressed as assets less liabilities, as liabilities less assets, or as the ratio between rate sensitive assets (“RSA”) and rate sensitive liabilities (“RSL”). For example, a short-funded position (liabilities repricing before assets) would be expressed as a net negative position, when period gaps are computed by subtracting repricing liabilities from repricing assets. When using the ratio method, a RSA/RSL ratio of 1 indicates a balanced position, a ratio greater than 1 indicates an asset-sensitive position and a ratio less than 1 indicates a liability-sensitive position.
 
A negative gap and/or a rate sensitivity ratio less than 1 tends to expand net interest margins in a falling rate environment and reduce net interest margins in a rising rate environment. Conversely, when a positive gap occurs, generally margins expand in a rising rate environment and contract in a falling rate environment. From time to time, the Corporation may elect to deliberately mismatch liabilities and assets in a strategic gap position.
 
At March 31,June 30, 2011, the Corporation reflected a positive interest sensitivity gap with an interest sensitivity ratio of 1.18:1.34:1.00 at the cumulative one-year position. Based on management’s perception of interest rates remaining low through 2011, emphasis has been, and is expected to continue to be placed, on controlling liability costs while extending the maturities of liabilities in order to insulate the net interest spread from rising interest rates in the future. However, no assurance can be given that this objective will be met.
 
Estimates of Fair Value
 
The estimation of fair value is significant to a number of the Corporation’s assets, including loans held for sale and available-for-sale investment securities. These are all recorded at either fair value or the lower of cost or fair value. Fair values are volatile and may be influenced by a number of factors. Circumstances that could cause estimates of the fair value of certain assets and liabilities to change include a change in prepayment speeds, discount rates, or market interest rates. Fair values for most available-for-sale investment securities are based on quoted market prices. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic condition risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature, involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

39

 
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
 
The financial statements and notes thereto presented elsewhere herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of operations; unlike most industrial companies, nearly all of the Corporation’s assets and liabilities are monetary. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on performance than do the effects of general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.
43

 
Liquidity
 
The liquidity position of the Corporation is dependent primarily on successful management of the Bank’s assets and liabilities so as to meet the needs of both deposit and credit customers. Liquidity needs arise principally to accommodate possible deposit outflows and to meet customers’ requests for loans. Scheduled principal loan repayments, maturing investments, short-term liquid assets and deposit inflows, can satisfy such needs. The objective of liquidity management is to enable the Corporation to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations in a timely and cost-effective manner.
 
Management monitors current and projected cash flows, and adjusts positions as necessary to maintain adequate levels of liquidity. Under its liquidity risk management program, the Corporation regularly monitors correspondent bank funding exposure and credit exposure in accordance with guidelines issued by the banking regulatory authorities. Management uses a variety of potential funding sources and staggering maturities to reduce the risk of potential funding pressure. Management also maintains a detailed contingency funding plan designed to respond adequately to situations which could lead to stresses on liquidity. Management believes that the Corporation has the funding capacity to meet the liquidity needs arising from potential events. In addition to pledgeable investment securities, the Corporation also maintains borrowing capacity through the Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window and the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York secured with loans and marketable securities.
 
The Corporation’s primary sources of short-term liquidity consist of cash and cash equivalents and unpledged investment securities available-for-sale.
 
At March 31,June 30, 2011, the Parent Corporation had $3.4$2.7 million in cash and short-term investments compared to $4.3 million at December 31, 2010. Expenses at the Parent Corporation are moderate and management believes that the Parent Corporation presently has adequate liquidity to fund its obligations.
 
Certain provisions of long-term debt agreements, primarily subordinated debt, prevent the Corporation from creating liens on, disposing of or issuing voting stock of subsidiaries. As of March 31,June 30, 2011, the Corporation was in compliance with all covenants and provisions of these agreements.
 
Deposits
 
Total deposits increased to $934.6$965.7 million at March 31,June 30, 2011 from $860.3 million at December 31, 2010. Total non interest-bearing deposits increased from $144.2 million at December 31, 2010 to $154.9$158.7 million at March 31,June 30, 2011, an increase of $10.7$14.5 million or 7.410.1 percent. Interest-bearing demand, savings and time deposits under $100,000 increased a total of $17.7$41.6 million at March 31,June 30, 2011 as compared to December 31, 2010. Time deposits $100,000 and over also increased $45.9$49.3 million as compared to year-end 2010 primarily due to an increase in deposits received at the end of the quarter.second quarter of 2011. Time deposits $100,000 and over represented 17.717.5 percent of total deposits at March 31,June 30, 2011 compared to 13.9 percent at December 31, 2010.
 
Core Deposits
 
The Corporation derives a significant proportion of its liquidity from its core deposit base. Total demand deposits, savings and money market accounts of $714.1$745.0 million at March 31,June 30, 2011 increased by $27.8$58.8 million, or 4.18.6 percent, from December 31, 2010. At March 31,June 30, 2011, total demand deposits, savings and money market accounts were 76.477.1 percent of total deposits compared to 79.8 percent at year-end 2010. Alternatively, the Corporation uses a more stringent calculation for the management of its liquidity positions internally, which calculation consists of total demand, savings accounts and money market accounts (excluding money market accounts greater than $100,000 and time deposits) as a percentage of total deposits. This number decreasedincreased by $5.9$23.1 million, or 1.254.9 percent, from $475.1 million at December 31, 2010 to $469.2$498.2 million at March 31,June 30, 2011 and represented 50.251.6 percent of total deposits at March 31,June 30, 2011 as compared with 55.2 percent at MarchDecember 31, 2010.

40

 
The Corporation continues to place the main focus of its deposit gathering efforts in the maintenance, development, and expansion of its core deposit base. TheManagement believes that the emphasis on serving the needs of our communities will provide a long term relationship base that will allow the Corporation to efficiently compete for business in its market. The success of this strategy is reflected in the growth of the demand, savings and money market balances during the quarter.second quarter of 2011.
44

 
The following table depicts the Corporation’s core deposit mix at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 based on the Corporation’s alternative calculation:
 
 March 31, 2011  December 31, 2010  
Dollar
Change
  June 30, 2011  December 31, 2010  
Dollar
Change
 
 Amount  Percentage  Amount  Percentage  2011 vs. 2010  Amount  Percentage  Amount  Percentage  2011 vs. 2010 
 (dollars in thousands)  (dollars in thousands) 
Non interest-bearing demand $154,910   33.0% $144,210   30.4% $10,700  $158,689   31.9% $144,210   30.4% $14,479 
Interest-bearing demand  179,980   38.4   186,509   39.2   (6,529)  190,994   38.3   186,509   39.2   4,485 
Regular savings  99,529   21.2   112,305   23.6   (12,776)  107,209   21.5   112,305   23.6   (5,096)
Money market deposits under $100  34,775   7.4   32,105   6.8   2,670   41,297   8.3   32,105   6.8   9,192 
Total core deposits $469,194   100.0% $475,129   100.0% $(5,935) $498,189   100.0% $475,129   100.0% $23,060 
                                        
Total deposits $934,646      $860,332      $74,314  $965,676      $860,332      $105,344 
Core deposits to total deposits      50.2%      55.2%          51.6%      55.2%    
 
Borrowings
 
Total borrowings amounted to $202.1$198.5 million at March 31,June 30, 2011, reflecting a decrease of $15.9$19.5 million from December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily the result of the maturity of a Federal Home Loan Bank advance and the repayment of a Federal Funds Purchase, offset by an increase in overnight customer repurchase agreement activity.  Overnight customer repurchase transactions covering commercial customer sweep accounts totaled $35.9$32.4 million at March 31,June 30, 2011, compared with $28.9 million at December 31, 2010. The shift in the volume of repurchase agreements also accounted for a portion of the change in the Corporation’s non interest-bearing commercial checking account balance during the period.
 
Short-Term Borrowings
 
Short-term borrowings, which consist primarily of securities sold under agreements to repurchase, Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances and federal funds purchased, generally have maturities of less than one year. The details of these short-term borrowings are presented in the following table.
 
    March 31, 2011     June 30, 2011 
 (dollars in thousands)  (dollars in thousands) 
Average interest rate:      
At quarter end   0.30%  0.23%
For the quarter  0.27%  0.28%
Average amount outstanding during the quarter $47,287  $36,747 
Maximum amount outstanding at any month end in the quarter $71,732  $43,799 
Amount outstanding at quarter end $35,917  $32,374 
 
Long-Term Borrowings
 
Long-term borrowings, which consist primarily of FHLB advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase, totaled $161.0 million at March 31,June 30, 2011, and mature within one to eight years. The FHLB advances are secured by pledges of FHLB stock, 1-4 family mortgages and U.S. government and Federal agency obligations. At March 31,June 30, 2011, FHLB advances and securities sold under agreements to repurchase had weighted average interest rates of 3.46 percent and 5.31 percent, respectively.
 
Subordinated Debentures
 
On December 19, 2003, Center Bancorp Statutory Trust II, a statutory business trust and wholly-owned subsidiary of Center Bancorp, Inc., issued $5.0 million of MMCapS capital securities to investors due on January 23, 2034. The trust loaned the proceeds of this offering to the Corporation and received in exchange $5.2 million of the Parent Corporation’s subordinated debentures. The subordinated debentures are redeemable in whole or part. The floating interest rate on the subordinated debentures is three-month LIBOR plus 2.85 percent and reprices quarterly. The rate at March 31,June 30, 2011 was 3.153.12 percent. The capital securities qualify as Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes.

 
4145

 
 
Cash Flows
 
The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows present the changes in cash and cash equivalents resulting from the Corporation’s operating, investing and financing activities. During the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, cash and cash equivalents increased by $13.3$72.0 million over the balance at MarchDecember 31, 2010. Net cash of $4.8$7.8 million was provided by operating activities, namely, net income as adjusted to net cash. Net income of $3.1$6.6 million was adjusted principally by net gains on sales of investment securities of $861,000,$1.8 million, provision for loan losses of $878,000,$1.1 million, a decrease in prepaid FDIC insurance assessments of $473,000$1.1 million and a decrease in other assets of $349,000.$1.4 million. Net cash used in investing activities amounted to approximately $19.9$20.5 million, primarily reflecting a net increase in investment securities of $12.5$31.3 million, along with a net increase in loans of $7.8$10.5 million. Net cash of $57.8$84.6 million was provided by financing activities, primarily from the increase in deposits of $74.3$105.3 million offset in part by the funding of decreases in short and long term borrowings during the period of $15.9$19.5 million.
 
Stockholders’ Equity
 
       Total stockholders’ equity amounted to $124.6$130.1 million, or 9.679.95 percent of total assets, at March 31,June 30, 2011, compared to $121.0 million or 10.02 percent of total assets at December 31, 2010. Book value per common share was $7.05$7.39 at March 31,June 30, 2011, compared to $6.83 at December 31, 2010. Tangible book value (i.e., total stockholders’ equity less preferred stock, goodwill and other intangible assets) per common share was $6.01$6.35 at March 31,June 30, 2011, compared to $5.79 at December 31, 2010.
 
Tangible book value per share is a non-GAAP financial measure and represents tangible stockholders’ equity (or tangible book value) calculated on a per common share basis. The Corporation believes that a disclosure of tangible book value per share may be helpful for those investors who seek to evaluate the Corporation’s book value per share without giving effect to goodwill and other intangible assets. The following table presents a reconciliation of total book value per share to tangible book value per share as of March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
 
 March 31,  December 31,  June 30,  December 31, 
 2011  2010  2011  2010 
 (in thousands, except for share data)  (in thousands, except for share data) 
Stockholders’ equity $124,584  $120,957  $130,104  $120,957 
Less: Preferred stock  9,721   9,700   9,741   9,700 
Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets  16,942   16,959   16,927   16,959 
Tangible common stockholders’ equity $97,921  $94,298  $103,436  $94,298 
                
Book value per common share $7.05  $6.83  $7.39  $6.83 
Less: Goodwill and other intangible assets  1.04   1.04   1.04   1.04 
Tangible book value per common share $6.01  $5.79  $6.35  $5.79 
 
In January 2009, the Corporation issued $10 million in nonvoting senior preferred stock to the U.S. Department of Treasury under its Capital Purchase Program. As part of the transaction, the Corporation also issued warrants to the U.S. Treasury to purchase 173,410 shares of common stock of the Corporation at an exercise price of $8.65 per share. The Corporation's voluntary participation in the Capital Purchase Program represented approximately 50 percent of the dollar amount that the Corporation qualified to receive under the U. S. Treasury program.
 
In October 2009, the Corporation successfully raised approximately $11 million in a rights offering to existing stockholders and private placement with its standby purchaser. As a result of the successful completion of the rights offering, the number of shares underlying the warrants held by the U.S. Treasury under the Capital Purchase Program was reduced by 50 percent, to 86,705 shares.
 
In September 2010, the Corporation sold an aggregate of 1,715,000 shares of its common stock under its previously filed shelf registration statement which was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5, 2010. The Corporation sold 1,430,000 shares of common stock at a price of $7.00 per share, with underwriting discounts and commissions of $0.39 per share, for gross proceeds from this offering of $10,010,000. The Corporation also sold 285,000 shares of common stock directly to certain of its directors at a price of $7.50 per share, for gross proceeds from this offering of $2,137,500. After underwriting discounts and commissions of $557,700 and offering expenses of approximately $200,000 which consisted primarily of legal and accounting fees, net proceeds from both offerings totaled $11,389,800.

 
4246

 
 
During the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2011, the Corporation had no purchases of common stock associated with its stock buyback programs. At March 31,June 30, 2011, there were 652,868 shares available for repurchase under the Corporation’s stock buyback programs. As described in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, the Corporation is restricted from repurchasing its Common Stock while its issued preferred stock is held by the U. S. Treasury.
 
Regulatory Capital and Capital Adequacy
 
The maintenance of a solid capital foundation is a primary goal for the Corporation. Accordingly, capital plans and dividend policies are monitored on an ongoing basis. The Corporation’s objective of the capital planning process is to effectively balance the retention of capital to support future growth with the goal of providing stockholders with an attractive long-term return on their investment.
 
The Corporation and the Bank are subject to regulatory guidelines establishing minimum capital standards that involve quantitative measures of assets, and certain off-balance sheet items, as risk-adjusted assets under regulatory accounting practices.
 
The following is a summary of regulatory capital amounts and ratios as of March 31,June 30, 2011 for the Corporation and the Bank, compared with minimum capital adequacy requirements and the regulatory requirements for classification as a well-capitalized depository institution.

 Center Bancorp, Inc.  
For Capital Adequacy
Purposes
  
To Be Well-Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective Action
Provisions
  Center Bancorp, Inc. 
For Capital Adequacy
Purposes
 
To Be Well-Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective Action
Provisions
At March 31, 2011 Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio 
At June 30, 2011 Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
 (dollars in thousands)  (dollars in thousands)
                                    
Tier 1 leverage capital $119,099   9.83% $48,488   4.00%  N/A     N/A  $122,101 9.50% $51,411 4.00% N/A N/A 
Tier 1 risk-based capital  119,099   13.25%  35,946   4.00%  N/A    N/A  122,101 13.16% 37,113 4.00% N/A N/A 
Total risk-based capital  128,690   14.32%  71,893   8.00%  N/A    N/A  131,937 14.22% 74,226 8.00%  N/A N/A 
             

 
Union Center
National Bank
  
For Capital Adequacy
Purposes
  
To Be Well-Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective Action
Provisions
  
Union Center
National Bank
 
For Capital Adequacy
Purposes
 
To Be Well-Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective Action
Provisions
At March 31, 2011 Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio 
At June 30, 2011 Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
 (dollars in thousands)  (dollars in thousands)
                                    
Tier 1 leverage capital $115,652   9.54% $48,471   4.00% $60,589   5.00% $119,269 9.29% $51,354 4.00% $64,192 5.00%
Tier 1 risk-based capital  115,652   12.87%  35,938   4.00%  53,906   6.00% 119,269 12.86% 37,098 4.00% 55,647 6.00%
Total risk-based capital  125,243   13.94%  71,875   8.00%  89,844   10.00% 129,105 13.92% 74,198 8.00% 92,748 10.00%
 

N/A - not applicable
 
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) has established higher minimum capital ratios for the Bank effective as of December 31, 2009:  Tier 1 leverage capital of 8.0 percent, Tier 1 risk-based capital of 10.0 percent and Total risk-based capital of 12.0 percent. As of March 31,June 30, 2011, management believes that each of the Bank and the Corporation meet all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject, including those established for the Bank by the OCC.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the "OCC") has determined that the Memorandum of Understanding (the "MOU") that had previously been entered into by the Bank is no longer required and, accordingly, the OCC has terminated the MOU. 
 
Basel III
 
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) provides a forum for regular cooperation on banking supervisory matters. Its objective is to enhance understanding of key supervisory issues and improve the quality of banking supervision worldwide. It seeks to do so by exchanging information on national supervisory issues, approaches and techniques, with a view to promoting common understanding. At times, the Committee uses this common understanding to develop guidelines and supervisory standards in areas where they are considered desirable. In this regard, the Committee is best known for its international standards on capital adequacy; the Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision; and the Concordat on cross-border banking supervision.

 
4347

 
 
       The Basel Committee released a comprehensive list of proposals for changes to capital, leverage, and liquidity requirements for banks in December 2009 (commonly referred to as “Basel III”).  In July 2010, the Basel Committee announced the design for its capital and liquidity reform proposals and in September 2010, the oversight body of the Basel Committee announced minimum capital ratios and transition periods.
In December 2010 and January 2011, the Basel Committee published the final texts of reforms on capital and liquidity generally referred to as “Basel III.” Although Basel III is intended to be implemented by participating countries for large, internationally active banks, its provisions are likely to be considered by United States banking regulators in developing new regulations applicable to other banks in the United States, including Union Center National Bank.
For banks in the United States, among the most significant provisions of Basel III concerning capital are the following:
 
A minimum ratio of common equity to risk-weighted assets reaching 4.5%, plus an additional 2.5% as a capital conservation buffer, by 2019 after a phase-in period.
A minimum ratio of common equity to risk-weighted assets reaching 4.5%, plus an additional 2.5% as a capital conservation buffer, by 2019 after a phase-in period.

A minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets reaching 6.0% by 2019 after a phase-in period.
A minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets reaching 6.0% by 2019 after a phase-in period.

A minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets, plus the additional 2.5% capital conservation buffer, reaching 10.5% by 2019 after a phase-in period.
A minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets, plus the additional 2.5% capital conservation buffer, reaching 10.5% by 2019 after a phase-in period.

An additional countercyclical capital buffer to be imposed by applicable national banking regulators periodically at their discretion, with advance notice.
An additional countercyclical capital buffer to be imposed by applicable national banking regulators periodically at their discretion, with advance notice.

Restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonuses applicable when capital ratios fall within the buffer zone.
Restrictions on capital distributions and discretionary bonuses applicable when capital ratios fall within the buffer zone.

Deduction from common equity of deferred tax assets that depend on future profitability to be realized.
Deduction from common equity of deferred tax assets that depend on future profitability to be realized.

Increased capital requirements for counterparty credit risk relating to OTC derivatives, repos and securities financing activities.
Increased capital requirements for counterparty credit risk relating to OTC derivatives, repos and securities financing activities.

For capital instruments issued on or after January 13, 2013 (other than common equity), a loss-absorbency requirement such that the instrument must be written off or converted to common equity if a trigger event occurs, either pursuant to applicable law or at the direction of the banking regulator. A trigger event is an event under which the banking entity would become nonviable without the write-off or conversion, or without an injection of capital from the public sector. The issuer must maintain authorization to issue the requisite shares of common equity if conversion were required.
For capital instruments issued on or after January 13, 2013 (other than common equity), a loss-absorbency requirement such that the instrument must be written off or converted to common equity if a trigger event occurs, either pursuant to applicable law or at the direction of the banking regulator. A trigger event is an event under which the banking entity would become nonviable without the write-off or conversion, or without an injection of capital from the public sector. The issuer must maintain authorization to issue the requisite shares of common equity if conversion were required.

The Basel III provisions on liquidity include complex criteria establishing the LCR and NSFR. Although Basel III is described as a “final text,” it is subject to the resolution of certain issues and to further guidance and modification, as well as to adoption by United States banking regulators, including decisions as to whether and to what extent it will apply to United States banks that are not large, internationally active banks.
 
Looking Forward
 
One of the Corporation’s primary objectives is to achieve balanced asset and revenue growth, and at the same time expand market presence and diversify its financial products. However, it is recognized that objectives, no matter how focused, are subject to factors beyond the control of the Corporation, which can impede its ability to achieve these goals. The following factors should be considered when evaluating the Corporation’s ability to achieve its objectives:
 
The financial marketplace is rapidly changing and currently is in flux. The U.S. Treasury and banking regulators have implemented, and may continue to implement, a number of programs under new legislation to address capital and liquidity issues in the banking system. In addition, new financial system reform legislation may affect banks’ abilities to compete in the marketplace. It is difficult to assess whether these programs and actions will have short-term and/or long-term positive effects.
48

 
Banks are no longer the only place to obtain loans, nor the only place to keep financial assets. The banking industry has lost market share to other financial service providers. The future is predicated on the Corporation’s ability to adapt its products, provide superior customer service and compete in an ever-changing marketplace.

44

 
Net interest income, the primary source of earnings, is impacted favorably or unfavorably by changes in interest rates. Although the impact of interest rate fluctuations can be mitigated by appropriate asset/liability management strategies, significant changes in interest rates can have a material adverse impact on profitability.
 
The ability of customers to repay their obligations is often impacted by changes in the regional and local economy. Although the Corporation sets aside loan loss provisions toward the allowance for loan losses when the Board determines such action to be appropriate, significant unfavorable changes in the economy could impact the assumptions used in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance.
 
Technological changes will have a material impact on how financial service companies compete for and deliver services. It is recognized that these changes will have a direct impact on how the marketplace is approached and ultimately on profitability. The Corporation has taken steps to improve its traditional delivery channels. However, continued success will likely be measured by the ability to anticipate and react to future technological changes.
 
This “Looking Forward” description constitutes a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the Corporation’s forward-looking statements due to numerous known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including the factors referred to in this quarterly report and in the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures about Market Risks
 
Market Risk
 
The Corporation’s profitability is affected by fluctuations in interest rates. A sudden and substantial increase or decrease in interest rates may adversely affect the Corporation’s earnings to the extent that the interest rates borne by assets and liabilities do not similarly adjust. The Corporation’s primary objective in managing interest rate risk is to minimize the adverse impact of changes in interest rates on the Corporation’s net interest income and capital, while structuring the Corporation’s asset-liability structure to obtain the maximum yield-cost spread on that structure. The Corporation relies primarily on its asset-liability structure to control interest rate risk. The Corporation continually evaluates interest rate risk management opportunities and has been focusing its efforts on increasing the Corporation’s yield-cost spread through wholesale and retail growth opportunities.
 
The Corporation monitors the impact of changes in interest rates on its net interest income using several tools. One measure of the Corporation’s exposure to differential changes in interest rates between assets and liabilities is the Corporation’s analysis of its interest rate sensitivity. This test measures the impact on net interest income and on net portfolio value of an immediate change in interest rates in 100 basis point increments. Net portfolio value is defined as the net present value of assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts.
 
The primary tool used by management to measure and manage interest rate exposure is a simulation model. Use of the model to perform simulations reflecting changes in interest rates over multiple-year time horizons enables management to develop and initiate strategies for managing exposure to interest rate risk. In its simulations, management estimates the impact on net interest income of various changes in interest rates. Projected net interest income sensitivity to movements in interest rates is modeled based on a ramped rise and fall in interest rates based on a parallel yield curve shift over a twelve month time horizon and then maintained at those levels over the remainder of the model time horizon, which provides a rate shock to the two-year period and beyond. The model is based on the actual maturity and repricing characteristics of interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities. The model incorporates assumptions regarding earning asset and deposit growth, prepayments, interest rates and other factors.
 
Management believes that both individually and taken together, these assumptions are reasonable, but the complexity of the simulation modeling process results in a sophisticated estimate, not an absolutely precise calculation of exposure. For example, estimates of future cash flows must be made for instruments without contractual maturities or payment schedules.
 
Based on the results of the interest simulation model as of March 31,June 30, 2011, and assuming that management does not take action to alter the outcome, the Corporation would expect an increasea decrease of 0.950.57 percent in net interest income if interest rates increased by 200 basis points from current rates in a gradual and parallel rate ramp over a twelve month period. These results and other analyses indicate to management that the Corporation’s net interest income is presently minimally sensitive to rising interest rates.
 
 
4549

 
 
Based on management’s perception that financial markets will continue to be volatile, interest rates that are projected to continue at low levels will generate increased downward repricing of earning assets. Emphasis has been, and is expected to continue to be, placed on interest-sensitivity matching with an overall objective of improving the net interest spread and margin during 2011. However, no assurance can be given that this objective will be met.
 
Equity Price Risk
 
The Corporation is exposed to equity price risk inherent in its portfolio of publicly traded equity securities, which had an estimated fair value of approximately $4.9 million and $4.8 million at March 31,June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively. We monitor equity investment holdings for impairment on a quarterly basis. In the event that the carrying value of the equity investment exceeds its fair value, and the decline in value is determined to be to be other than temporary, the carrying value is reduced to its current fair value by recording a charge to current operations. For the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2011 and 2010, the Corporation recorded no other-than-temporary impairment charges on its equity security holdings.
 
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
 
a) Disclosure controls and procedures. As of the end of the Corporation’s most recently completed fiscal quarter covered by this report, the Corporation carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Corporation’s management, including the Corporation’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Corporation’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and are operating in an effective manner and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Corporation’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
b) Changes in internal controls over financial reporting: There have been no changes in the Corporation’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the Corporation’s last fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonable likely to materially affect, the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
 
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
 
In December 2009, the Corporation took steps to terminate a participation agreement with another New Jersey bank at December 31, 2009. Under the terms of the agreement, the participation ended on December 31, 2009, and, in the Corporation’s view, the lead bank is required to repurchase the remaining balance. The lead bank questioned our enforcement of the participation agreement. Therefore, the Corporation filed suit against Highlands State Bank (“Highlands”) in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, in Morris County, New Jersey (Docket No. MRS-C-189-09), for the return of the outstanding principal.  Highlands has answered the complaint and filed a counterclaim. The initial pleadings have been filed and the discovery phase is ongoing. For additional information regarding this matter, see Item 3 of the Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
There are no other significant pending legal proceedings involving the Corporation other than those arising out of routine operations. Based upon the information currently available, it is the opinion of management that the disposition or ultimate determination of such other claims will not have a material adverse impact on the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or liquidity of the Corporation.  This statement constitutes a forward-looking statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results could differ materially from this statement as a result of various factors, including the uncertainties arising in proving facts within the context of the legal processes..processes.
 
50

Item 1A. Risk Factors
 
There have been no material changes in risk factors from those disclosed under Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in Center Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

46

 
Item 6. Exhibits
 
Exhibit No. Description
   
31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1* Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2* Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS**XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**
Definition Taxonomy Extension Linkbase Document
101.LAB**
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* = Furnished and not filed.

** = Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.
 
4751

 

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf, by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
CENTER BANCORP, INC.
(Registrant)

By:/s/ Anthony C. Weagley By:/s/ Vincent N. Tozzi
 
Anthony C. Weagley
President and Chief Executive Officer
  
Vincent N. Tozzi
Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
     
 Date: May 10,August 9, 2011  Date: May 10,August 9, 2011

 
4852