UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2013

¨ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2022

TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from ______ to _______

Commission File Number:000-53223

 000-53223

GBS ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED

MARIZYME, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada 27-375505582-5464863
(State or other jurisdictionOther Jurisdiction of incorporation or (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
organization)Incorporation or Organization) 

585 Molly Lane

Woodstock, GA

30189
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)Identification No.)

 

(404) 891-1711555 Heritage Drive, Suite 205, Jupiter, Florida33458

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(925)400-3123

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)number)

With a copy to:

Philip Magri, Esq.

The Magri Law Firm, PLLC

11 Broadway, Suite 615

New York, NY 10004

T: (646) 502-5900

F: (646) 826-9200

pmagri@magrilaw.com

www.MagriLaw.com

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantregistrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes ☒ No ☐

Yes   x No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrantRegistrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrantRegistrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes ☒ No ☐

Yes   ¨ No   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large“large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer"” “accelerated filer,” and "smaller“smaller reporting company"company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange ct.Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer¨Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting companyx
Emerging growth company

Indicate by checkmarkcheck mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No

Yes   ¨ No   x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE REGISTRANTS

IndicateIf an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the number of shares outstanding of eachregistrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the registrant’s classes of common stock, asExchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the latest practicable date. Act:

Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Not applicable.

As of November 14, 2013, there were 30,837,624August 15, 2022, the registrant had 40,828,188 shares of common stock ($0.001 par value $0.001 per share, of the Registrant issued andvalue) outstanding.

 

 

MARIZYME, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No:
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.Financial Statements3
ItemITEM 1.Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements3
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets3
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations4
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity5
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows6
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements7
ITEM 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations4518
ItemITEM 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk5926
ItemITEM 4.Controls and Procedures5926
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.Legal Proceedings60
Item 1A.ITEM 1.Risk FactorsLegal Proceedings6027
ItemITEM 1A.Risk Factors28
ITEM 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds6028
ItemITEM 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities6029
Item 5.ITEM 4.Other InformationMine Safety Disclosures6029
Item 6.ITEM 5.ExhibitsOther Information6129
SignaturesITEM 6.Exhibits29
62Signatures30

2

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ItemITEM 1. Financial StatementsCONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GBS Enterprises IncorporatedMARIZYME, INC.

InterimCondensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

September 30, 2013 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2012 (Audited and Restated)

 

         
  June 30, 2022 December 31, 2021
  (unaudited)  
ASSETS:        
Current        
Cash $2,044,976  $4,072,339 
Accounts receivable  53,083   8,650 
Other receivables  12,589   41,307 
Prepaid expenses  235,382   257,169 
Inventory  268,413   22,353 
Total current assets  2,614,443   4,401,818 
Non-current        
Property, plant and equipment, net  12,681   12,817 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net  1,667,151   1,158,776 
Intangible assets, net  52,445,606   52,866,192 
Prepaid royalties, non-current  339,091   339,091 
Deposits  30,000   30,000 
Goodwill  7,190,656   7,190,656 
Total non-current assets  61,685,185   61,597,532 
Total assets $64,299,628  $65,999,350 
         
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:        
Current        
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $617,041  $1,596,147 
Notes payable  241,392   127,798 
Due to related parties  223,661   1,132,634 
Operating lease obligations  418,330   277,142 
Total current liabilities  1,500,424   3,133,721 
Non-current        
Operating lease obligations, net of current portion  1,248,821   881,634 
Notes payable, net of current portion     469,252 
Convertible notes  842,946   26,065 
Derivative liabilities  4,423,725   2,485,346 
Contingent liabilities  14,935,000   11,313,000 
Total non-current liabilities  21,450,492   15,175,297 
Total liabilities 22,950,916  18,309,018 
         
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)      
         
Stockholders’ equity:        
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021      
Common stock, par value $0.001, 75,000,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding shares - 40,828,188 and 40,528,188 at June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively  40,828   40,528 
Additional paid-in capital  102,180,316   95,473,367 
Accumulated deficit  (60,872,432)  (47,823,563)
Total stockholders’ equity  41,348,712   47,690,332 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $64,299,628  $65,999,350 

     Restated 
  September 30,  December 31, 
  2013  2012 
  $  $ 
Assets        
Current Assets        
Cash and cash equivalents - Note 6  259,614   1,154,602 
Accounts Receivable - Note 7  3,528,260   4,143,448 
Inventory - Note 3  21,684   - 
Prepaid expenses - Note 8  207,811   84,304 
Other current receivables - Note 9  276,856   676,976 
Assets held for sale  -   384,862 
Total current assets  4,294,224   6,444,192 
         
Non-Current Assets        
Assets held for sale  -   1,846,645 
Property, plant and equipment - Note  11  282,601   332,839 
Other non-current receivables - Note 12  1,217   428,422 
Deferred tax assets non-current - Note 10  1,076,010   1,132,103 
Goodwill - Note 13  31,260,500   34,254,881 
Software - Note 14  10,232,633   12,207,031 
Other assets - Note 15  132,489   156,379 
Total non-current assets  42,985,450   50,358,300 
         
Total assets  47,279,675   56,802,492 
         
Liabilities and stockholders' equity        
Current liabilities        
Notes payable  1,775,010   2,313,572 
Liabilities to banks - Note 16  3,887,764   6,774 
Accounts payables and accrued liabilities - Note 17  3,946,070   6,241,733 
Deferred income - Note 18  6,846,920   6,099,570 
Other short term liabilities - Note 19  242,252   860,032 
Due to related parties  -   2,115,869 
Liabilities held for sale  -   589,634 
Total current liabilities  16,698,017   18,227,184 
         
Non-Current liabilities        
Liabilities to banks  -   3,716,102 
Retirement benefit obligation  172,414   165,876 
Liabilities held for sale  -   159,898 
Total non-current liabilities  172,414   4,041,876 
         
Total liabilities  16,870,431   22,269,060 
         
Stockholders' equity        
Capital stock - Note 20        
Authorized:        
75,000,000 common shares of $.001 par value each        
25,000,000 preferred shares of $.001 par value each        
Issued and outstanding:        
30,837,624   shares of common stock        
(29,461,664  shares of common stock at December 31, 2012)  30,838   29,462 
Additional paid in capital  50,009,107   49,691,195 
Subscription Receivable  50,000   - 
Accumulated deficit  (21,646,422)  (18,974,582)
Other comprehensive income  (299,034)  442,841 
         
   28,144,489   31,188,916 
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries  2,264,754   3,344,516 
         
Total stockholders' equity  30,409,243   34,533,432 
         
Total stockholders' equity and liabilities  47,279,675   56,802,492 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

 

Subsequent events - Note 25

GBS Enterprises IncorporatedMARIZYME, INC.

InterimCondensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income/(Loss)

(Unaudited)

                 
  Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2022  2021  2022  2021 
             
Revenue $61,809  $160,785  $61,809  $234,737 
                 
Operating expenses:                
Direct cost of revenue  11,025   119,221   11,025   150,063 
Professional fees (includes related party amounts of $163,200, $90,000, $266,400, and $180,000 respectively)  873,865   455,552   1,417,905   984,625 
Salary expenses  902,106   683,197   1,817,746   1,567,238 
Research and development  1,371,470   244,686   2,589,766   636,190 
Stock-based compensation  676,242   194,657   1,392,674   562,375 
Depreciation and amortization  210,361   26,715   420,722   (186,216)
Other general and administrative expenses  618,498   349,496   1,009,070   645,068 
Total operating expenses  4,663,567   2,073,524   8,658,908   4,359,343 
Total operating loss $(4,601,758) $(1,912,739) $(8,597,099) $(4,124,606)
                 
Other income (expense)                
Interest and accretion expenses  (530,226)  (4,189)  (829,770)  (4,189)
Change in fair value of contingent liabilities  (1,792,000)  278,000   (3,622,000)  278,000 
Total other income (expense)  (2,322,226)  273,811   (4,451,770)  273,811 
                 
Net loss $(6,923,984) $(1,638,928) $(13,048,869) $(3,850,795)
                 
Loss per share – basic and diluted $(0.17) $(0.05) $(0.32) $(0.11)
                 
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding – basic and diluted  40,828,188   35,928,188   40,728,740   35,928,188 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

MARIZYME, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

For the threeThree and nine month periods ended SeptemberSix Months Ended June 30, 20132022 and September 30, 2012 (Restated)2021

(Unaudited)

                     
  Common Stock  Additional Paid-in  Accumulated  Total Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity 
                
Balance, December 31, 2020  35,928,188  $35,928  $82,077,334  $(36,825,634) $45,287,628 
Stock-based compensation expense  -   -   334,385   -   334,385 
Net loss - restated  -   -   -   (2,211,867)  (2,211,867)
Balance, March 31, 2021  35,928,188  $35,928  $82,411,719  $(39,037,501) $43,410,146 
Stock-based compensation expense  -   -   194,657   -   194,657 
Adjustment of warrants value in connection with finalizing the business combination  -   -   (732,300)  -   (732,300)
Net loss - restated  -   -   -   (1,638,928)  (1,638,928)
Balance, June 30, 2021  35,928,188  $35,928  $81,874,076  $(40,676,429) $41,233,575 

  Common Stock  Additional Paid-in  Accumulated  Total Stockholders’ 
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Equity 
                
Balance, December 31, 2021  40,528,188  $40,528  $95,473,367  $(47,823,563) $47,690,332 
Stock-based compensation expense  -   -   716,432   -   716,432 
Issuance of warrants  -   -   2,969,916   -   2,969,916 
Exercise of warrants  300,000   300   2,700   -   3,000 
Net loss  -   -   -   (6,124,885)  (6,124,885)
Balance, March 31, 2022  40,828,188  $40,828  $99,162,415  $(53,948,448) $45,254,795 
Stock-based compensation expense  -   -   676,242   -   676,242 
Issuance of warrants  -   -   2,341,659   -   2,341,659 
Net loss  -   -   -   (6,923,984)  (6,923,984)
Balance, June 30, 2022  40,828,188  $40,828  $102,180,316  $(60,872,432) $41,348,712 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

 

  For the three months ended  For the nine months ended 
     Restated     Restated 
  September 30,  September 30,  September 30,  September 30, 
  2013  2012  2013  2012 
  $  $  $  $ 
             
Revenues - Note 21                
Products  4,133,565   4,719,446   13,170,113   15,247,883 
Services  932,091   990,333   2,442,935   3,516,745 
   5,065,656   5,709,778   15,613,048   18,764,628 
Cost of goods sold                
Products  563,950   922,839   2,738,549   3,833,550 
Services  1,709,105   2,289,927   4,951,817   6,616,975 
   2,273,055   3,212,767   7,690,366   10,450,525 
Gross profit  2,792,601   2,497,011   7,922,682   8,314,103 
                 
Operating expenses                
Selling expenses  2,033,242   2,625,773   6,627,311   9,990,170 
Administrative expenses  1,145,304   1,229,281   3,922,440   3,940,092 
General expenses  120,364   318,350   392,329   711,227 
   3,298,910   4,173,403   10,942,080   14,641,489 
                 
Operating income (loss)  (506,309)  (1,676,392)  (3,019,398)  (6,327,386)
                 
Other Income (expense) - Note 22                
Other Income (expense)  44,726   892,702   566,430   52,543 
Interest income  -   209   420   2,866 
Interest expense  (140,213)  (133,741)  (546,333)  (241,405)
   (95,487)  759,169   20,517   (185,996)
                 
Income (loss) before income taxes  (601,796)  (917,223)  (2,998,882)  (6,513,382)
                 
Income tax (income) expense  487   (287,718)  13,807   (1,409,759)
                 
Income (loss) before discontinued operations  (602,283)  (629,504)  (3,012,689)  (5,103,623)
                 
Discontinued operations - Note 4  -   (33,125)  -   63,246 
                 
Net income (loss)  (602,283)  (662,629)  (3,012,689)  (5,040,377)
                 
Net Loss Attributable to noncontrolling Interest  535,588   (271,574)  (340,849)  (1,699,550)
Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders  (1,137,871)  (391,055)  (2,671,840)  (3,340,827)
                 
Net earnings (loss) per share, basic and diluted $(0.0373) $(0.0137) $(0.0879) $(0.1168)
                 
Weighted average number of common stock outstanding, basic and diluted  30,492,650   28,611,701   30,379,612   28,611,701 
                 
Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss):                
                 
Net Income (Loss)  (602,283)  (662,629)  (3,012,689)  (5,040,377)
Foreign currency Translation Adjustment  (365,488)  (2,503,497)  (1,480,788)  (116,135)
                 
Comprehensive income (loss)  (967,771)  (3,166,126)  (4,493,477)  (5,156,512)
                 
Less: Net Income (Loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest  535,588   (271,574)  (340,849)  (1,699,550)
Less: Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest  (182,378)  (1,223,936)  (738,913)  (32,642)
                 
Total Comprehensive income (loss) attributed to stockholders  (1,320,981)  (1,670,617)  (3,413,715)  (3,424,320)

GBS Enterprises IncorporatedMARIZYME, INC.

InterimCondensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012 (Restated)(Unaudited)

(Unaudited)

         
  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2022  2021 
       
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net loss $(13,048,869) $(3,850,795)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:        
Depreciation and amortization  420,722   (186,216)
Stock-based compensation  1,392,674   529,042 
Stock-based compensation - restricted common stock  -   33,333 
Interest and accretion on convertible notes and notes payable  829,770   - 
Issuance of warrants for services  1,850,533   - 
Change in fair value of contingent liabilities  3,622,000   (278,000)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts and other receivable  (15,715)  (78,686)
Prepaid expense  21,787   44,701 
Inventory  (246,060)  39,600 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  (973,544)  506,418 
Due to related parties  (908,973)  265,000 
Net cash used in operating activities  (7,055,675)  (2,975,603)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Proceeds from promissory notes, net of issuance cost  5,120,743   74,945 
Repayment of notes payable  (95,431)  - 
Proceeds from exercise of warrants  3,000   - 
Net cash provided by financing activities  5,028,312   74,945 
         
Net change in cash  (2,027,363)  (2,900,658)
         
Cash at beginning of period  4,072,339   2,902,762 
         
Cash at end of period $2,044,976  $2,104 
         
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:        
Cash paid for interest $-  $- 
Cash paid for taxes $-  $- 
         
Non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Derivative liabilities and debt discount issued in connection with convertible notes $1,938,379  $24,982 
Warrants and debt discount issued in connection with convertible notes $3,461,042  $49,963 
Settlement of notes payable with convertible notes $278,678  $- 
Contingent liabilities $

-

  $9,648,000 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

 

     Restated 
  September 30, 2013  September 30, 2012 
  $  $ 
       
Cash flow from operating activities        
Net loss / net income  (3,012,689)  (5,103,623)
Adjustments        
Deferred income taxes  56,093   (1,421,720)
Depreciation and amortization  3,399,200   3,289,383 
Write-down of Goodwill and Intangibles  -   3,079,168 
Consulting expense  74,000   - 
Interest Expense  195,288   - 
Gains (Losses)  on Sale of Assets  -   (1,566,119)
Gains (Losses) from equity investment  -   (26,751)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Accounts receivable, prepaid assets, other current receivables  3,574,403   1,471,490 
Other Assets  -   (37,398)
Retirement benefit obligation  6,538   - 
Inventories  (21,684)  119,245 
Accounts payable and other liabilities  (2,915,625)  (2,438,073)
         
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities  1,355,523   (2,634,397)
Net cash provided (used) by discontinued  -   63,246 
         
Cash flow from investing activities        
Sale (Purchase) of intangible assets  

487,309

   (2,527,077)
Sale (Purchase) of property, plant and equipment  -   (579,206)
Increase (Decrease) in Financial assets  -   614,480 
         
Net cash provided (used) in investing activities  

487,309

   (2,491,803)
         
Cash flow from financing activities        
Net borrowings - banks  164,889   1,067,397 
Other borrowings  (538,562)  (2,074,044)
Capital paid-in  100,000   3,583,176 
Loans from related party  (2,115,869)  (28,432)
         
Net cash provided (used) in financing activities�� (2,389,541)  2,548,096 
         
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash  (348,280)  6,991 
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash  (894,988)  (2,507,867)
Cash and cash equivalents - Beginning of the year  1,154,602   3,250,821 
         
Cash and cash equivalents - End of Quarter  259,614   742,954 

Notes to the Interim Financial StatementsMARIZYME, INC.

September 30, 2013NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

UnauditedNOTE 1 – DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Note 1          COMPANY AND BACKGROUND

GBS Enterprises Incorporated,Maryzime, Inc. (the “Company” or “Marizyme”) is a Nevada corporation through its subsidiaries, is a global provider of technology solutions for businesses and government agencies. We focus on developing and delivering solutions that help our customers to gain value and reduce cost in the development, deployment and management of the applications used in the course of conducting their business (“business applications”). We do this by building software and providing services that aid in:

¨Information Technology (“IT”) systems analysis, planning and management;
¨Automating business processes;
¨Optimizing system and application performance;
¨Ensuring the security and compliance of systems, applications and processes; and
¨Migrating and integrating systems, applications and processes.

Our customers include corporate and government IT departments, solutions integrators (“SIs”) and independent software vendors (“ISVs”). Our corporate customers are from a variety of industries, including insurance, financial services, pharmaceuticals, healthcare, manufacturing, logistics, and education. The install-base of our software products spans more than 5,000,000 users in 38 countries on four continents. We principally market and sell our products and services directly in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the Nordics and India; and indirectly through local distributors and resellers representing Australia, South America and regionally in Europe.

Our software and services are designed to mainly serve organizations that have investments in IBM’s Lotus® Notes and Domino platform. The IBM Lotus® Notes and Domino platform is both a system for enterprise email as well as an application platform, meaning that it can be used as both an email system and an environment in which business applications can be deployed and used. This platform was originally brought to market by Lotus Development Corp. in 1989, and was subsequently acquired by IBM in 1995. According to Radiate, in 2011, IBM Lotus Domino will have a worldwide installed base of 189 million mailboxes. Currently, the installed base for On-Premises IBM Lotus Domino mailboxes represents the majority of worldwide IBM Lotus Domino mailboxes, accounting for 87% of worldwide IBM Lotus Domino mailboxes. By 2015, this percentage is expected to decrease to 80%, as hosted email grows in popularity. (The Radiate Group Inc., April 2011, “IBM Lotus Notes/Domino Market Analysis, 2011-2015“)

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

We, through our subsidiaries, have executed our strategy to acquire companies, which have developed software and specialized services for the Lotus Notes and Domino market. This growth by acquisition strategy has resulted in less competition for our software products; a large concentration of highly skilled employees with unique expertise in the area of Lotus Notes and Domino; staff and physical offices on three continents providing greater access to a global market; significant market awareness and greater market share amongst organizations that use Lotus Notes and Domino; and a comprehensive portfolio of solutions specific to the needs and requirements of organizations which use Lotus Notes and Domino.

While our products and services remain in use and demand, over the last several years, the market itself has been undergoing a paradigm shift. New technologies, especially in the areas of Cloud Computing and Mobile applications, have grown in popularity due to the potential cost savings and operational efficiencies they can offer. As organizations make investments in these new technologies, they are faced with highly complex and costly projects to migrate (“migration”) or replace their existing systems that don’t operate in the cloud or on mobile devices (“modernization”) – this includes their existing email and business applications that run on Lotus Notes and Domino.

To that end, we have acquired and developed technologies that help organizations reduce the time, cost, resources and risks associated with these highly complex migration and modernization projects.

General Corporate History

We were incorporated in Nevada on March 20, 2007, asunder the name SWAV Enterprises, Ltd. (“SWAV”). SWAV was an importer and wholesaler of Chinese manufactured goods.

On April 26, 2010, SWAV purchased certain technology assets of Lotus Holdings Ltd. (“Lotus”) in exchange for 2,265,240 shares of SWAV common stock. Also on April 26, 2010, Lotus (on behalf of the SPPEF Members as discussed below) purchased an aggregate of 11,984,770 of the outstanding shares of common stock from the selling shareholders of SWAV for an aggregate of $370,000. As a result of the two sets of transactions, Lotus owned an aggregate of 14,250,010 shares of common stock of SWAV, representing approximately 95.0% of the 15,000,000 shares of SWAV common stock outstanding on April 26, 2010.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

On September 6, 2010, SWAV’sthe Company name was changed to GBS Enterprises Incorporated. Inc. and from 2010 to September 2018 the Company was in the software products and advisory services business for email and instant messaging applications. The Company divested that business between December 2016 and September 2018 and focused on the acquisition of life science technologies.

On October 14, 2010,March 21, 2018, the Company’s trading symbolname was changed to Marizyme, Inc., to reflect the new life sciences focus. Marizyme’s common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board was changed from SWAV to GBSX.

About Lotus Holdings, Ltd.

Lotus is a holding company which was formed under the laws of Gibraltar for the purpose of financing merger and acquisition projects, specifically in the niche market of small or microcap companies listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange with complex shareholder structures and whose stock is trading below one Euro (€1.00) per share.

SPPEFs

Lotus typically finances its merger and acquisition projects through the use of Special Purpose Private Equity Funds (“SPPEFs”). Typically, SPPEFs are funded by a company’s major shareholders (the “Major Shareholders”) seeking to raise capital for projects and who fund at least 50% of the SPPEF, with the remaining portion being provided through the investment community and network of investors in Lotus. Each SPPEF is co-managed by a representative of the company’s Major Shareholders (the “Representative Secretary”) and an attorney appointed by Lotus (the “Lotus Representative”).

On February 25, 2010, a group of shareholders (the “GROUP Major Shareholders”) of GROUP Business Software AG, a German public company trading on the Frankfurt Stock ExchangeMarkets’ QB tier under the symbol “INW” (“GROUP”), engaged Lotus to provide financial consulting and advisory services, on a non-exclusive basis, for the primary task of establishing a SPPEF. On March 12, 2010, the GROUP Major Shareholders and Lotus established and funded a SPPEF with $1,400,000, consisting of $1,000,000 from the GROUP Major Shareholders and $400,000 from a Lotus investor (collectively, the “SPPEF Members”)“MRZM”.

In early April 2010, the SPPEF Members decided to acquire SWAV. As disclosed above, on April 26, 2010, Lotus, on behalf of the SPPEF Members, acquired an aggregate of 11,984,770 shares of SWAV common stock from the selling shareholders of SWAV for an aggregate purchase price of $370,000. NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

The 11,984,770 shares of SWAV common stock represented approximately 79.9% of the 15,000,000 outstanding shares of SWAV common stock on April 26, 2010. Upon the consummation of the acquisition, the then executive officers and directors of SWAV resigned and Mr. Joerg Ott, the Chief Executive Officer of GROUP and a GROUP Major Shareholder, was appointed the Chief Executive Officer of SWAV and sole member of SWAV’s Board of Directors.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Transactions following the acquisition

On November 1, 2010, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 3,043,985 of the 11,984,770 shares of the Company’s common stock originally purchased by Lotus on April 26, 2010. In consideration for the 3,043,985 shares of the Company’s common stock, the Company issued to Lotus a Secured Demand Note, dated November 1, 2010 (the “First Demand Note”), for the principal amount of $300,000 bearing interest at the rate of 5% per annum. The First Demand Note was repaid in September 2011.

Effective December 30, 2010, pursuant to securities purchase agreements between the Company and six GROUP Major Shareholders, the Company purchased an aggregate of 7,115,500 shares of GROUP common stock from the six GROUP Major Shareholders in consideration for an aggregate for 3,043,985 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “December Transaction”). As a result the Company owned approximately 28.2% of the outstanding common stock of GROUP.

Reverse Merger

After the December Transaction was completed, the additional GROUP Major Shareholders accepted the share swap offer from the Company and effectuated a reverse merger of GROUP and the Company. To effectuate the reverse merger, on January 5, 2011, the Company repurchased from Lotus an aggregate of 2,361,426 of the 11,984,770 shares of the Company’s common stock originally purchased by Lotus on April 26, 2010. In consideration for these 2,361,426 shares, the Company issued to Lotus a Secured Demand Note, dated January 5, 2011 (the “Second Demand Note”), for the principal amount of $200,000 bearing interest at the rate of 5% per annum. The Second Demand Note was repaid in November 2011.

Effective January 6, 2011, pursuant to securities purchase agreements between the Company and the remaining GROUP Major Shareholders, the Company purchased an aggregate of 5,525,735 shares of GROUP common stock from the remaining GROUP Major Shareholders in consideration for an aggregate of 2,361,426 shares of the Company’s common stock (the “January Transaction”). The 5,525,735 GROUP shares represented approximately 21.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock of GROUP. As a result of the December Transaction and January Transaction, the Company purchased an aggregate of 12,641,235 shares of GROUP from the GROUP Major Shareholders in consideration for an aggregate of 5,405,411 shares of the Company’s common stock, resulting in the Company owning approximately 50.1% of the outstanding common stock of GROUP and effectuating a reverse merger of the Company and GROUP whereby GROUP became the accounting acquirer.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Additional Acquisition

On February 27, 2012, the Company acquired an additional 883,765 shares of common stock of GROUP from GAVF LLC for an average purchase price of $.070 per share, or approximately $619,000, after an outstanding loan of GROUP was converted into an aggregate of 1,750,000 shares of GROUP common stock, thereby increasing GROUP’s outstanding common stock to 26,982,000 shares. By acquiring the new shares, the Company increased its ownership of GROUP common stock to an aggregate of 13,525,000 shares, representing approximately 50.1% of the outstanding common stock of GROUP.

Acquisition/Dissolution of Subsidiary Companies

Pavone AG

Effective April 1, 2011, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of Pavone AG, a German corporation, for $350,000 in cash and 1,000,000 shares of its common stock. The fair value of the common stock was determined to be $4.90 per share, representing the market value at the end of trading on the date of the acquisition. The total value of the investment, including the assumption of $ 583,991 in debt was $5,843,991. Pavone’s extensive workflow software for Lotus Notes and Domino along with their large customer base is well suited to GBS Enterprises portfolio strategy. The acquisition of Pavone complements GBS's majority ownership in GROUP and the Company believes that it further strengthens their leading industry position on the IBM Lotus Platforms and expands their cloud computing technology offerings beyond the IBM Lotus market. Pavone currently has offices in Germany and the UK. They have over 2,500 customers and over 150,000 users worldwide.

GroupWare, Inc.

Effective June 1, 2011, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of GroupWare, Inc., a Florida corporation (“GroupWare”). As consideration the Company paid $250,000 and issued 250,000 shares of its common stock. The fair value of the common stock was determined to be $4.34 per share, representing the market value at the end of trading on the date of the acquisition. The total value of the investment, including the assumption of $ 694,617 in debt was $ 2,029,617. Upon the consummation of the acquisition, the management and board of GroupWare resigned and Joerg Ott, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and sole director, was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer and sole director of GroupWare. GroupWare is based in Lubeck, Germany with offices in St. Petersburg, Florida. GroupWare's ePDF server delivers centralized, network-wide PDF solutions for messaging, workflow, document, content and data management. The Company believes that the acquisition strengthens the GBS Modernizing/Migrating offering, which helps bring IBM Lotus Notes client applications to the web, by substituting traditional printing methods provided by the Notes client with simple-to-use print-to-PDF capabilities in the browser.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

IDC Global, Inc.

On July 25, 2011, the Company acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of IDC Global, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“IDC”). Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, dated July 15, 2011, the Company agreed to issue the shareholders an aggregate of 800,000 shares of common stock and made a cash payment of $750,000. The agreement required an additional payment to the management shareholders of 80,000 shares of common stock and signing bonuses to personnel of $35,000. The Company also agreed to reimburse IDC up to $25,000 for incurred accounting and legal fees related to the transaction. The fair value of the common stock was determined to be $3.70 per share, representing the market value at the end of trading on the date of the agreement. The total value of the investment, including $883,005 of debt assumption, was $4,066,000. IDC was a privately held company that provides nationwide network and data center services. IDC delivers customized, high availability technology solutions for WAN, Wireless Services, Co-location & Hosting, Managed Services, and Network Security. IDC includes two Data Center facilities located in the downtown Chicago area and Colocation facilities in three other Data Centers in New York, London, England and Frankfurt, Germany. IDC provides internet infrastructure Services (IaaS) to the business community helping customers make the transition from large, static and expensive on-premise computing to dynamic, flexible and cost-effective off-premise computing. IDC is helping customers make the transition from large, static and expensive on-premise computing to dynamic, flexible and cost-effective off-premise computing.

Due to the Company’s perceived increase in the demand for Modernization, Mobility and Optimization offerings, the Company made a strategic decision in 2012 to focus on its core offerings in the IBM Notes and Domino market and to divest its non-core businesses, including IDC.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

On February 1, 2013, GBS entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated February 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”), with IDC and Global Telecom & Technology Americas, Inc., a Virginia corporation (“GTT). Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, we sold 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of IDC to GTT for an aggregate purchase price of $4,600,000 (the “Purchase Price”), subject to certain holdback provisions amounting to $1.093 million as described more fully in the Stock Purchase Agreement. The Purchase Price is also subject to adjustment on a dollar-for-dollar basis for adjustments the Net Working Capital (defined as Current Assets minus Current Liabilities) of IDC by GTT within 90 days of closing.

SD Holdings, Ltd.

On September 27, 2011, the Company entered into an acquisition agreement with SD Holdings, Ltd. (“SYN”), a Mauritius corporation, and the shareholders of SYN owning 100% of issued and outstanding shares of SYN. SYN owns 100% of all issued and outstanding shares of Synaptris, Inc., a California corporation (“Synaptris”), and 100% of all issued and outstanding shares of Synaptris Decisions Private Limited, a company formed in India (“Synaptris India”). Pursuant to the acquisition agreement, the Company purchased one hundred percent (100%) of the issued and outstanding shares of SYN (“SYN Shares”) effective November 1, 2011 in consideration for $525,529 and agreed to issue 700,000 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment. Actual shares issued were 612,874. The fair value of the common stock was determined to be $2.05 per share, representing the market value at the end of trading on the date of the agreement.

On April 1, 2012, the Company sold SYN, Synaptris and Synaptris India for $1,877,232 to Lotus Holding, Ltd. in an effort to restructure the Company’s multilevel subsidiary - structure derived from the historical mergers and acquisitions, and to reduce overhead and administrative costs.

GBS India Private Limited

Pursuant to an existing transfer agreement, effective July 1, 2012, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with SYN for $1,877,232, which transferred all assets, including intellectual property rights, and liabilities of the IntelliPRINT and FewClix product lines, customer contracts and certain employees for operations in a new subsidiary, GBS India Private Limited, an incorporated entity formed under the Indian Companies Act 1956 (“GBS India”). A royalty fee in the amount of approximately $350,000 has been agreed upon for the benefit the Company. Additionally a profit based fee of up to $700,000 may be earned based on license and revenue recognized from the sold IntelliVIEW and IntelliVIEW NXT products.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

On August 1, 2012, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of GBS India. We anticipate GBS India’s presence in India to accelerate our plan to expand our product development team particularly for our strategic offerings in India.

Pavone AG/Groupware AG

On July 6, 2012 and August 9, 2012, wholly-owned subsidiaries Pavone AG and Groupware AG, respectively, were merged into Pavone GmbH. The mergers were consummated solely for administrative purposes. Pavone GmbH is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Pavone, Ltd.

The Company serves the UK market with GROUP’s subsidiary GBS, Ltd. Therefore, subsidiary Pavone, Ltd, as being a shell company, was dissolved on July 8, 2012.

EbVokus, GmbH.

On October 1, 2012, GROUP Business Software AG sold all of the software and operational assets (constituting substantially all of the assets) of its wholly-owned subsidiary, ebVokus GmbH, along with the associated maintenance and project agreements to a non-affiliated third party for a purchase price of approximately $459,000, approximately $258,000 (200,000 Euros: 1 EUR = $1.29 USD on October 1, 2012) was paid at closing and the remaining $201,000 was paid on February 15, 2013 (150,000 Euro: 1EUR = $1.35 USD on February 15, 2013).

B.E.R.S. AD

On November 23, 2012, GROUP Business Software AG sold its entire participation (50%) in B.E.R.S AD for a total of 25,000 BGN.

Group Live, N.V.

Group Live N.V. operating under the laws of the Netherlands and a 100% subsidiary of GROUP declared its end of business May 31, 2012, registered in the commercial register June 22, 2012. Following the local procedures the company has been dissolved from the register as per April 5, 2013, registered April 16, 2013.

13

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Note 2         INTERIM REPORTING

The accompanying unaudited interimcondensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements prepared under the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. They do not include all information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. However, except as disclosed herein, they include all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These interim financial statements follow the same accounting policies and methods of their application as the Company’s audited financial statements. All adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the year ending December 31, 2013.

Note 3         ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The financial statements and accompanying notes are prepared in accordance with accountingusing principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the more significantrealization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, the Company does not have an established source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and to allow it to continue as a going concern. The Company, since its inception, has incurred recurring operating losses and negative cash flows from operations and has an accumulated deficit of $60,872,432 at June 30, 2022 (December 31, 2021 - $47,823,563). Additionally, the Company has working capital of $1,114,019 (December 31, 2021 - $1,268,097) and $2,044,976 (December 31, 2021 - $4,072,339) of cash on hand, which may not be sufficient to fund operations for the next twelve months. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Under the going concern assumption, an entity is ordinarily viewed as continuing its business for the foreseeable future with neither the intention or necessity of liquidation, ceasing trading, or seeking protection from creditors pursuant to the laws and regulations. Accordingly, assets and liabilities are as follows:recorded on the basis that the entity will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparationability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to continue to successfully develop its intangible assets, receive a clearance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) to extend the selling of the products into the U.S. market which will allow the Company to attain profitable operations.

During the next twelve months, the Company’s foreseeable cash requirements will relate to continuous operations of its business, maintaining its good standing and making the required filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and the payment of expenses associated with its product development. The Company may experience a cash shortfall and be required to raise additional capital. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a private or public offerings. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to continue to develop and expand its products and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries: My Health Logic Inc (“My Health Logic” or “MHL”), Somahlution, Inc. (“Somahlution”), Somaceutica, Inc. (“Somaceutica”), (collectively – “Somah”), and Marizyme Sciences, Inc. (“Marizyme Sciences”). All intercompany transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements presented in this Quarterly Report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2022 (the “2021 Form 10-K”). The balance sheet as of December 31, 2021 was derived from audited consolidated financial statements included in the 2021 Form 10-K but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The Company’s significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to those consolidated financial statements.

Interim results may not be indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted from these interim financial statements. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments which in the opinion of management are necessary to fairly present the results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and stockholders’ equity for the periods indicated. Except as otherwise disclosed, all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

7

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make use of certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosuresdisclosure of contingent assets and liabilities atas of the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenuesrevenue and expenses during the reported periods. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that management believes are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates are related to the allocation of the purchase price in a business combination to the underlying assets and liabilities, recoverability of long-term assets including intangible assets and goodwill, amortization expense, valuation of warrants, stock-based compensation, derivative liabilities, contingent liabilities and deferred tax valuations.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company uses the fair value hierarchy to measure the value of its financial instruments. The fair value hierarchy is based on inputs to valuation techniques that are used to measure fair value that are either observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing based upon its own market assumptions. The basis for fair value measurements for each level within the hierarchy is described below:

Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level 2 – Quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other model-derived valuations whose inputs are directly or indirectly observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.
Level 3 – Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs to the valuation model are unobservable and for which assumptions are used based on management estimates.

The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible and considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.

The carrying amounts of certain accounts and other receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, notes payable, and amounts due to related parties approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

The fair value of lease obligations is determined using discounted cash flows based on the expected amounts and timing of the cash flows discounted using a market rate of interest adjusted for appropriate credit risk.

The contingent liabilities assumed on the acquisition of Somah in 2020 consist of present values of royalty payments, performance warrants and pediatric voucher warrants, future rare pediatric voucher sales, and liquidation preference. Management measured these contingencies in accordance with Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

i.The performance warrants and pediatric vouchers warrants liabilities were valued using a Monte Carlo simulation model utilizing the following weighted average assumptions: risk free rate of 1.19%, expected volatility of 69.62%, expected dividend of $0, and expected life of 6.21 years. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, changes in these assumptions resulted in $2,092,000 and $2,898,000 increase in fair value of these liabilities, respectively. At June 30, 2022, the fair market value of performance warrants and pediatric vouchers warrants liabilities was $7,250,000 (December 31, 2021 – $4,352,000).
ii.The present value of royalty payments was measured using the scenario-based methodology. In assessing the value attributed to the royalty payments, the estimated future cash flows were discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the revenue from net sales of the product. The cash flows derived from the Company’s fifteen-year strategic plan are based on managements’ expectations of market growth, industry reports and trends, and past performances. These projections are inherently uncertain due to the evolving impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The discounted cash flow model included projections surrounding revenue, discount rates, and growth rates. The discount rates used to calculate the present value of royalty payments reflect specific risks of the Company and market conditions and the mid-range was estimated at 20.6%. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, changes in these assumptions resulted in $293,000 decrease and $772,000 increase in fair value of this liability, respectively. At June 30, 2022, the fair market value of royalty payments was $4,760,000 (December 31, 2021 – $3,988,000).
iii.Rare pediatric voucher sales liability was valued based on the scenario-based methodology where the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset – 20.6%. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, changes in these assumptions resulted in $7,000 and $48,000 decrease in fair value of this liability, respectively. At June 30, 2022, the fair market value of rare pediatric voucher sales liability was $1,102,000 (December 31, 2021 – $1,150,000).
iv.The present value of liquidation preference liability, included in the contingent consideration, was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing method and represents the fair value of the maximum payment amount according to the agreement. The following assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model: risk free rate of 0.21%, expected volatility of 78.93%, expected dividend of $0, and expected life of 5 years. No changes to the fair value of liquidation preference liability were recorded in the three and six months ended June 30, 2022. At June 30, 2022, the fair market value of liquidation preference was $1,823,000 (December 31, 2021 – $1,823,000).

The derivative liabilities consist of optional and automatic conversion features and the share redemption feature attached to the convertible notes, issued pursuant to the Unit Purchase Agreement (Note 7).

8

The Company has no financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis. None of the Company’s non-financial assets or liabilities are recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis. No transfers between levels have occurred during the periods presented.

Marizyme measures the following financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis. As at June 30, 2022, and December 31, 2021, the fair values of these financial instruments were as follows:

SCHEDULE OF FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

  Fair Value Hierarchy 
June 30, 2022 Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Liabilities            
Derivative liabilities $-  $-  $4,423,725 
Contingent liabilities  -   -   14,935,000 
Total $-  $-  $19,358,725 

  Fair Value Hierarchy 
December 31, 2021 Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Liabilities            
Derivative liabilities $-  $-  $2,485,346 
Contingent liabilities  -   -   11,313,000 
Total $-  $-  $13,798,346 

The following table provides a roll forward of all liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 significant unobservable inputs:

RECONCILIATION OF LIABILITIES AT FAIR VALUE

Derivative and Contingent Liabilities   
Balance at December 31, 2021 $13,798,346 
Change in fair value of contingent liabilities  3,622,000 
Derivative liabilities issued pursuant to Unit Purchase Agreement  1,938,379 
Balance at June 30, 2022 $19,358,725 

The Company had $Nil in contingent liabilities and $24,982 in derivative liabilities as at June 30, 2021.

Research and Development Expenses and Accruals

All research and development costs are expensed in the period incurred and consist primarily of salaries, payroll taxes, and employee benefits, for individuals involved in research and development efforts, external research and development costs incurred under agreements with contract research organizations and consultants to conduct and support the Company’s ongoing clinical trials of Duragraft, and costs related to manufacturing Duragraft for clinical trials. The Company has entered into various research and development contracts with various organizations. Payments of these activities are based on the terms of the individual agreements which matches to the pattern of costs incurred. Payments made in advance are reflected in the accompanying balance sheets as prepaid expenses. The Company records accruals for estimated costs incurred for ongoing research and development activities. When evaluating the adequacy of the accrued liabilities, the Company analyzes progress of the services, including the phase or completion of events, invoices received and contracted costs. Significant judgments and estimates may be required in determining the prepaid or accrued balances at the end of any reporting period. Actual results could differ from thosethe Company’s estimates.

Segment ReportingStock-Based Compensation

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) authoritative guidance regarding segment reporting establishes standardsStock-based compensation expense for the way that public business enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statementsemployees and requires that those enterprises report selected information about operating segments in interim financial reports. It also establishes standards for related disclosures about products and services, geographic areas and major customers. The Company has determined that it operates in only one segment – the development and maintenance of computer software programs and support products.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company adopted the FASB Codification topic (“ASC”) 220, “Reporting Comprehensive Income”, which establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its componentsdirectors is recognized in the financial statements. Comprehensive income consistsCondensed Consolidated Statements of net incomeOperations based on estimated amounts, including the grant date fair value and other gainsthe expected service period. For stock options, we estimate the grant date fair value using a Black-Scholes valuation model, which requires the use of multiple subjective inputs including estimated future volatility, expected forfeitures and losses affecting stockholder's equity that are excluded from net income, such as unrealized gains and losses on investments available for sale, foreign currency translation gains and losses and minimum pension liability. Since inception, the Company’s other comprehensive income represents foreign currency translation adjustments and small net actuarial losses on pension plans.

Net Income per Common Share

ASC 260, “Earnings per share,” requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) with a reconciliationexpected term of the numerator and denominator ofawards. We estimate the EPS computations. Basic earnings per share amounts areexpected future volatility based on the weighted average sharesstock’s historical price volatility. The stock’s future volatility may differ from the estimated volatility at the grant date. For restricted stock unit (“RSU”) equity awards, we estimate the grant date fair value using our closing stock price on the date of common stock outstanding. If applicable, diluted earnings per share would assume the conversion, exercise or issuance of all potential common stock instruments such as options, warrants and convertible securities, unlessgrant. We recognize the effect of forfeitures in compensation expense when the forfeitures occur. The estimated forfeiture rates may differ from actual forfeiture rates which would affect the amount of expense recognized during the period. We recognize the value of the awards over the awards’ requisite service or performance periods. The requisite service period is generally the time over which our share-based awards vest.

Comparative Information

To conform with the current period’s financial statement presentation, the Company reclassified certain professional fees, salaries, rent and repairs and maintenance expenses related to reduce a loss or increase earnings per share. Diluted net income (loss) per shareresearch and development activities for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, into the research and development expenses line item on the potential exerciseCondensed Consolidated Statements of the equity-based financial instruments isOperations. Such reclassifications were not presented where anti-dilutive. Accordingly, although the diluted weighted average number of common stock outstanding is disclosedconsidered material and did not have any effect on the statements of operation, the calculatedCompany’s net loss per share is the same for both the basic and diluted as both are based on the basic weighted average of common stock outstanding. There were no adjustments required to net income for the period presented in the computation of diluted earnings per share.three- and six- month periods ended June 30, 2021.

9

 

Financial Instruments

NOTE 4 – ACQUISITION

Financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and other receivable, financial assets, notes payable, liabilities

My Health Logic Inc.

On November 1, 2021, Marizyme entered into a definitive arrangement agreement with Health Logic Interactive Inc. (“HLII”) pursuant to banks, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities, due to related parties and retirement benefit obligations. Financial assets and liabilities are measured upon first recognition and reviewed at the financial statement date. Changes in fair value are recognized through profit and loss. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Currency Risk

We use the US dollar as our reporting currency. The functional currencies of our significant foreign subsidiaries are the local currency, which includes the Euro, the British Pound, the Indian Rupee, and the Bulgarian Lev. Accordingly, some assets and liabilities are incurred in those currencies and we are subject to foreign currency risks.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, for all financial instruments and non-financial instruments accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis. This new accounting standard establishes a single definition of fair value and a framework for measuring fair value, sets out a fair value hierarchy to be used to classify the source of information used in fair value measurement and expands disclosures about fair value measurements required under other accounting pronouncements. It does not change existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value. The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities, which are required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which the Company would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions and credit risk.

The Company has adopted ASC 825, Financial Instruments, which allows companies to choose to measure eligible financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not required to be measured at fair value. The Company has not elected the fair value option for any eligible financial instruments.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.

Inventories

Pursuant to ASC 330 (Inventories), inventories held for sale are recognized under inventories. Inventories were measured at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a first-in-first out basis, without any overhead component.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Goodwill and other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets predominately comprise goodwill, acquired software and capitalized software development services. Intangible assets acquired in exchange for payment are reflected at acquisition costs. If the development costs can be capitalized per ASC 985-20-25, these are reflected as ascribable personnel and overhead costs.

Company created software can be intended for sale to third parties or used by the Company itself. If the conditions for capitalization are not met, the expenses are recorded with their effect on profit in the year in which they were incurred.

The Company amortizes intangible assets with a limited useful life to the estimated residual book value in accordance with ASC regulations. In addition, in special circumstances according to ASC 350-30, a recoverability test is performed and, if applicable, unscheduled amortization is considered.

The useful life of acquired software is between three and five years and three years for Company created software.

Intangible assets obtained as part of an acquisition which do not meet the criteria for a separate entry are identified as goodwill. Goodwill is reviewed once a year during an impairment test, whereby the appraised fair value of the invested capital of the reporting unit, is compared with the carrying (book) value of its invested capital amount (including goodwill.) Use value is generally applied in order to determine the recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite useful life. The projected financial plan prepared by the management serves as the basis for this determination of use value and the planning assumptions are each adjusted for the current state of knowledge. Reasonable assumptions regarding macroeconomic trends and historical developments are taken into account in making these adjustments. Future estimated cash flows are determined based on the expected growth rates of the markets in question.

If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the appraised fair value, the impairment based on use value measures the amount of loss, if any, and an unscheduled amortization expense is recorded. If the appraised value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to be impaired.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are valued at acquisition or manufacturing costs reduced by scheduled and, if necessary, unscheduled depreciation. Fixed assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis, prorated over their expected useful life. Scheduled depreciation for property, plant and equipment is based on useful lives of 3 to 10 years. Leasehold Improvements are depreciated up to 40 years.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

If fixed assets are sold, retired or scrapped, the profit or loss arising from the difference between the net sales proceeds and the residual book value are included under other operating earnings and expenses.

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates the recoverability of its fixed assets and other assets in accordance with ASC topic, 360.10. This guidance requires recognition of impairment of long-lived assets in the event the net book value of such assets exceeds its’ expected cash flows or appraised value In this instance, the asset is considered to be impaired and is written down to fair value.

Revenue Recognition

Sources of Revenues:

License revenues

Our license revenues consist of revenues earned from the licensing of our software products. These products are generally licensed on a perpetual basis. Pricing models have generally been based either upon the physical infrastructure, such as the number of physical desktop computers or servers, on which our software runs or on a per user basis. License revenues are recognized when the elements of revenue recognition for the licensed software are complete, generally upon electronic shipment of the software and the software key to provide full access to all functionalities for our customers. In general, our invoices reflect license, service and maintenance components. In the case of multi element contracts, the revenues allocated to the software license in most cases represent the residual amount of the contract after the fair value of the other elements has been determined. Certain products of our software offering are licensed on a subscription basis.

Software maintenance revenues

Software maintenance revenues are recognized ratably on a pro-rata basis over the range of the contract period. Our contract periods typically range from one to five years. Vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value for software maintenance services is established by the rates charged in stand-alone sales of software maintenance contracts or the stated renewal rate for software maintenance. Customers who are party to software maintenance agreements with us are entitled to receive support, product updates and upgrades on a when-and-if-available basis.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Professional services revenues

Professional services include pre-project consulting, software design, customization, project management, implementation and training. Professional services are not considered essential to the functionality of our products, as these services do not alter the product capabilities and may be performed by our customers or by other vendors. Professional services engagements performed for a fixed fee, for which we are able to make reasonably dependable estimates of progress toward completion, are recognized on a proportional performance basis based on hours incurred and estimated hours of completion. Professional services engagements that are on a time and materials basis are recognized based on hours incurred. Revenues on all other professional services engagements are recognized upon completion. Our professional services may be sold with software products or on a stand-alone basis. Vendor Specific Objective Evidence (VSOE) of fair value for professional services is based upon the standard rates we charge for such services when sold separately.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Company is US dollars. For financial reporting purposes, the financial statements of the subsidiary companies whose functional currency is other than US dollars were translated into US dollars using the current rate method. Assets and liabilities were translated at the exchange rates at the balance sheet dates, revenue and expenses were translated at the average exchange rates and stockholders’ equity was translated at historical exchange rates. Any translation adjustments resulting are not included in determining net income but are included in foreign exchange adjustment to other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity.

Other Provisions

According to FASB ASC 450 “Contingencies”, provisions are made whenever there is a current obligation to third parties resulting from a past event which is likely in the future to lead to an outflow of resources and of which the amount can be reliably estimated. Provisions not already resulting in an outflow of resources in the following year are recognized at their discounted settlement amount on the financial statement date. The discount taken is based on market interest rates. The settlement amount also includes the expected cost increases. Provisions are not set off against contribution claims. If the amended estimate leads to a reduction of the obligatory amount, the provision is proportionally reversed and the earnings are recognized in other operating earnings.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Deferred Taxes

Income taxes are provided in accordance with FASB Codification topic 740, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. A deferred tax asset or liability is recorded for all temporary differences between financial and tax reporting and net operating loss-carry forwards.

Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that, that some portion oracquire all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Deferred tax assetsissued and liabilities are adjusted for the effect of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. With the objective of reducing the cost and complexity of performing an impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets by simplifying how an entity tests those assets for impairment and to improve consistency in impairment testing guidance among long-loved asset categories. The amendments permit an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having the likelihood of more than 50 percent. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed beginning April 1, 2013. Adoption of this new standard is not expected to have significant impact to the Company’s financial statement.

Off - Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any other financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our shares and classified as shareholder’s equity or that are not reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. We do not have any variable interest in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Principles of Consolidation and Reverse Acquisition

As previously disclosed, the Company has exchanged a total of 5,405,411 shares of common stock in exchange for 50.1% of the outstanding common shares of GROUP. AlthoughMy Health Logic, a wholly owned subsidiary of HLII, in exchange for common shares of Marizyme (the “Marizyme Shares”).

Marizyme is dedicated to the Companyacceleration, development and commercialization of medical technologies that promote patient health, therefore a strategic decision was made to acquire My Health Logic, which has provided Marizyme with access to MHL’s lab-on-chip technology platform and its patient-centric, digital point-of-care diagnostic device, MATLOC 1; and allowed for further growth and development of Marizyme’s portfolio of medical products.

On December 22, 2021, Marizyme received the legal acquirer,necessary regulatory, court and stock exchange approval to complete the acquisition of MHL resulting in a total of 4,600,000 Common Shares issued to HLII; 230,000 of these shares are being held and administered by Marizyme to be released to HLII, less any amounts claimed by Marizyme or its affiliates for any losses arising out of certain breaches as set out in the acquisition agreement. This resulted in HLII holding approximately 11.35% of the total number of issued and outstanding Marizyme Shares (based on 40,528,188 Marizyme Shares issued and outstanding immediately after closing).

In accordance with ASC 805-10 the substance of a transaction constitutes a business combination as the business of My Health Logic Inc. meets the definition of a business under the standard. Accordingly, the transaction was accounted for as a recapitalization of GROUP in the form of a reverse merger, whereby GROUP becomes the accounting acquirer and is deemed to have retroactively adopted the capital structure of the Corporation. Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the historical consolidated financial statements of GROUP for periods presented prior to January 6, 2011. All costs associated with the reverse merger transaction were expensed as incurred. Those expenses totaled approximately $300,000 and were included in professional fees in administrative expenses.

The Company has based its financial reporting for the consolidation with GROUP in accordance with the FASBacquisition method of accounting, and the assets acquired, and the liabilities assumed have been recorded at their respective estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The purchase price was based on management’s estimate of fair value of the common shares issued.

According to ASC 805-40 as it relates805 the acquirer has a year from the date of acquisition to reverse acquisitions. Goodwill has been measured asrecognize measurement period adjustments. While Marizyme does not expect the excesscarrying amount, the fair value, and the estimated useful life of identifiable assets and liabilities acquired, provided below, to change, the tax basis related to these intangible assets is not final and remains preliminary at June 30, 2022.

Details of the carrying amount and the fair value of the consideration effectively transferred by the Company, the acquiree, for financial reporting purposes, over the net amount of the Company’s recognized identifiable assets and liabilities.liabilities acquired and purchase consideration paid were as follows:

SCHEDULE OF PRELIMINARY ALLOCATION OF CONSIDERATION

Consideration given up    
Common shares $7,774,000 
Total consideration given up $7,774,000 
     
Fair value of identifiable assets acquired, and liabilities assumed    
Net working deficit $(613,156)
Property, plant, and equipment  12,500 
Intangible assets  6,600,000 
Goodwill  1,774,656 
Total identifiable assets $7,774,000 

We have recordedAs a result of the My Health Logic acquisition, we acquired its lab-on-chip technology platform, its patient-centric, digital point-of-care diagnostic device - MATLOC 1 as well as patents rights and trademarks relating to it. In addition, we acquired ownership rights to MATLOC patents issued in the European Union, Canada, and the United States.

The intangible assets acquired include:

Trade name, with estimated remaining economic life of 14 years,
Software, which enables customers to track and update their test results, with economic life of 15 years, and
Biotechnology intangible assets related to lab-on-chip technology, with estimated remaining economic life of 17 years.

As part of the acquisition, Marizyme assumed an aggregate of $468,137 in notes payable, the notes are unsecured, bear interest at a rate of 9% per annum and mature on August 12, 2022. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, Marizyme recognized $4,501 and $10,586 of interest expense on the notes payable, respectively (June 30, 2021 - $Nil and $Nil, respectively). The Company settled an aggregate of $278,678 of these notes payable as part of Unit Purchase Agreement issuances during the six months ended June 30, 2022 (Note 7). As of June 30, 2022, balance of notes payable was $209,025 (December 31, 2021 - $469,252).

Goodwill is attributed to the workforce and profitability of the acquired assetsbusiness and liabilitiesis not deductible for tax purposes. A residual method methodology was used to estimate the fair market value goodwill. A pre-tax discount rate based on weighted average cost of Group Business Software Enterprises, Inc. oncapital of 37.5% was used in the acquisition date of January 6, 2011, at their fair value assumptions for the assembled workforce acquired.

Pro-forma revenue, net income/(loss), and earnings per share are not presented for this acquisition as they are not material.

10

NOTE 5 – LEASES

On December 11, 2020, the operationsCompany entered into a 5.5 - year lease agreement for approximately 10,300 square feet of Group Business Software Enterprises, Inc. have been includedadministrative office and laboratories space, which commenced in December 2020 at a monthly rent of approximately $10,800, increasing by 2.5% annually beginning in the consolidated financial statements sincesecond year of the acquisition date.lease until the end of the term. Additionally, pursuant to the agreement, the Company would pay approximately $12,000 per month in operating expenses.

Effective April 1, 2022, the Company amended its lease agreement for administrative office and laboratories to add additional 3,053 square feet of space. The monthly cost of total expended lease space is approximately $15,260 increasing to $15,641 in 2023 and will continue to increase by 2.5% annually thereafter until the end of the term. The monthly operating expenses for total expanded premises have increased from approximately $12,000 to $17,500 per month. The term of the lease remains unchanged. As of June 30, 2022, the remaining lease term was 4.08 years. The lease had been classified as an operating lease.

The assets and liabilities from the lease were recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of GROUP,remaining lease payments over the acquirerlease term using the discount rate of 3.95%, which is the average commercial interest available at the time.

The total rent expense for financial reporting purposes,the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 was approximately $110,353 and $221,253, respectively (June 30, 2021 - $55,812 and $91,412, respectively).

The following table summarizes supplemental balance sheet information related to the operating lease as of June 30, 2022, and December 31, 2021.

SCHEDULE OF RIGHT-OF-USE ASSET AND RELATED LEASE LIABILITIES

  June 30, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Right-of-use asset $1,667,151  $1,158,776 
         
Operating lease liabilities, current $418,330  $277,142 
Operating lease liabilities, non-current  1,248,821   881,634 
Total operating lease liabilities $1,667,151  $1,158,776 

As of June 30, 2022, the maturities of the lease liabilities for the periods ending December 31 are measuredas follows:

SCHEDULE OF MATURITIES OF THE LEASE LIABILITIES

     
2022 $206,583 
2023  423,495 
2024  434,082 
2025  444,934 

2026

  266,034 
Total lease payments  1,775,128 
Less: present value discount  (107,977)
Total $1,667,151 

11

NOTE 6 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Krillase

As part of the asset acquisition of ACB Holding AB, Reg. No. 559119-5762, completed on September 12, 2018, Marizyme acquired all rights, titles, and recognized in the consolidated financial statements at their precombination carrying amounts in accordance with ASC 805-40-45-2(a). Therefore, the non-controlling interest reflects the non-controlling shareholders’ proportionate interest in the pre-combination carrying amountsKrillase technology, a group of GROUP’s netintangible assets even thoughworth $28,600,000. Krillase is a naturally occurring enzyme that acts to break protein bonds and has applications in wound debridement, wound healing, dental care and thrombosis. The useful lives of the non-controlling interests in other acquisitionsintangible assets are measured at their fair values atbased on the life of the patent and related technology. The patents and related technology for Krillase have not been amortized since the acquisition, date.as they have not yet been put into operations. The Company expects to put Krillase into operations and establish the first stream of revenue from the sale of the product in 2023.

NOTE 4         DISCONTINUED OPERATIONSDuraGraft

DueAs part of Somah acquisition in 2020, Marizyme purchased $18,170,000 of intangible assets related to the DuraGraft® technology.

My Health Logic

As part of My Health Logic acquisition (Note 4), Marizyme purchased MHL’s lab-on-chip technology platform and its patient-centric, digital point-of-care diagnostic device, MATLOC, fair valued at an aggregate amount of $6,600,000.

SCHEDULE OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS AMORTIZATION EXPENSE

  June 30, 2022  December 31, 2021 
  Gross Carrying Amount  Accumulated Amortization  Net Carrying Amount  Gross Carrying Amount  Accumulated Amortization  Net Carrying Amount 
Krillase intangible assets $28,600,000  $-  $28,600,000  $28,600,000  $-  $28,600,000 
Patents in process  122,745   -   122,745   122,745   -   122,745 
DuraGraft patent  5,256,000   (774,922)  4,481,078   5,256,000   (572,768)  4,683,232 
Duragraft - Distributor relationship  308,000   (59,033)  248,967   308,000   (43,633)  264,367 
Duragraft IPR&D - Cyto Protectant Life Sciences  12,606,000   -   12,606,000   12,606,000   -   12,606,000 
My Health Logic - Trade name  450,000   (16,875)  433,125   450,000   (804)  449,196 
My Health Logic - Biotechnology  4,600,000   (142,059)  4,457,941   4,600,000   (6,765)  4,593,235 
My Health Logic - Software  1,550,000   (54,250)  1,495,750   1,550,000   (2,583)  1,547,417 
Total intangibles $53,492,745  $(1,047,139) $52,445,606  $53,492,745  $(626,553) $52,866,192 

SCHEDULE OF GOODWILL

             
Goodwill DuraGraft  My Health Logic  Total 
Balance, December 31, 2020 $-  $-  $- 
Additions on acquisitions  5,416,000   1,774,656   7,190,656 
Impairment  -   -   - 
Balance, December 31, 2021 and June 30, 2022 $5,416,000  $1,774,656  $7,190,656 

The following changes to the Company’s perceived increaseintangible assets had taken place in the demandperiods indicated:

SCHEDULE OF INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Balance, December 31, 2020 $42,278,211 
Acquired in Somah Transaction  4,022,271 
Acquired in My Health Logic Transaction  6,600,000 
Additions  2,775 
Amortization expense  (37,065)
Balance, December 31, 2021 $52,866,192 
Amortization expense  (420,586)
Balance, June 30, 2022 $52,445,606 

Future amortizations for Modernization, MobilityDuragraft and Optimization offerings,My Health Logic intangible assets for the next five years will be $841,172 for each year from 2023 through 2027 and $6,910,999 for 2028 and thereafter. Amortization related to the Krillase product and in process research and development will be determined upon the Company made a strategic decision in 2012 to focus on its core offerings in the IBM Notes and Domino market and to divest its non-core businesses. As a result, on February 1, 2013, GBSachieving commercialization.

12

NOTE 7 - CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTES AND WARRANTS

May 2021 Unit Purchase Agreement

On May 27, 2021, Marizyme entered into a StockUnit Purchase Agreement dated February 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”), with IDC Global, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of GBS (“IDC”), and Global Telecom & Technology Americas, Inc., a Virginia corporation (“GTT). Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, we sold 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of IDC to GTT for an aggregate purchase price of $4,600,000 (the “Purchase Price”),

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Discontinued Operations and their results of operations, financial positions and cash flows are shown separately for the nine months ended on September 30, 2012 for comparative purposes. Summarized financial information for discontinued operations is set forth as follows:

Revenues
Services(2,648,976)
Cost of goods sold
Products(1,278,740)
Services(589,808)
Operating expenses
Selling expenses(554,448)
Administrative expenses(109,845)
General expenses(33,250)
Operating income(82,885)
Other Income (expense)
Other Income (expense)(13,486)
Income (loss) before income taxes(96,371)

Note 5          SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

The subsidiaries listed below were included in the basis of consolidation (KUSD = 1,000’s of US Dollars):

    Stockholders' Equity as of 9/30/2013  Percentage of Subscribed Capital    Profit of the consolidated quarter  Date of the First
  Headquarters KUSD  KUSD  in %  Ownership KUSD   Consolidation
                   
                   
GROUP Business Software (UK) Ltd. Manchester  -1,236   23   50,1% I  93  12/31/2005
GROUP Business Software Corp. Woodstock  -15,601   1   50,1% I  225  12/31/2005
GROUP LIVE N.V. Den Haag  1,274   134   50,1% I  -3  12/31/2005
Permessa Corporation Waltham  10   0   50,1% I  0  9/22/2010
Relavis Corporation Woodstock  -842   2   50,1% I  -23  1/8/2007
GROUP Business Software AG Eisenach  9,973   36,107   50,1% I  291  6/1/2011
Pavone GmbH Boeblingen  -863   47   100.0% D  334  1/4/2011
Groupware Inc. Woodstock  -482   1   100.0% D  0  1/6/2011
GBS India Chennai  191   12   100.0% D  46  9/30/2012

D - Direct Subsidiary

I -   Indirect Subsidiary

Indirect Subsidiaries are owned 50.1% through GROUP Business Software AG

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Note 6          CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

As of the financial statement date, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled 259 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 1,155 KUSD). Included in that amount are cash equivalents of 3 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 3 KUSD).

Note 7          ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

As of the financial statement date, Accounts Receivable was 3,528 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 4,143 KUSD). Receivables are generally measured at their nominal value and taking into account all foreseeable risks. Probable default risks are handled with specific allowances for bad debts. With regard to the trade receivables which are neither impaired nor delinquent, there are no indications as of the financial statement date that the debtors will not meet their payment obligations.

Note 8          PREPAID EXPENSES

Prepaid expenses in the amount of 208 KUSD were primarily recorded for prepaid rent, insurance and advance on technological collaboration events (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 84 KUSD).

Note 9          OTHER RECEIVABLES - CURRENT

Other Receivables as of the financial statement date were 277 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 677 KUSD) which includes tax deposits (248 KUSD), benefit credits (14 KUSD), other deposits (4K USD) and other miscellaneous receivables (11 KUSD).

23

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Note 10          DEFERRED TAX ASSETS

Deferred tax assets as of the financial statement date were 1,076 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 1,132 KUSD). All deferred tax assets are long term.

Deferred Tax Assets KUSD  KUSD 
  9/30/2013  12/31/2012 
       
Deferred Tax Assets – Current  0   0 
         
Deferred Tax Assets – Non-current  1,076   1,132 
         
Balance  1,076   1,132 

Note 11          PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Property, plant and equipment are measured at cost less scheduled straight-line depreciation. Depreciation of the computer hardware listed as office equipment is distributed over a period of three to five years. The depreciation period for other office equipment is three to ten years. Office furnishings are depreciated over a period of eight to ten years. Leasehold Improvements are depreciatedsell up to 40 years.

Property, Plant and Equipment 
kUSD
 Development
of the cost
  Development
of
accumulated
depreciation
  Balance 
          

12/31/2012

  7,219.4   6,893.7   325.7 
Additions  42   12     
Disposals  33   6     
Currency differences  8   3     
Reclassifications  0   0     
9/30/2013  7,219.4   6,893.7   325.7 

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Note 12         OTHER RECEIVABLES NON-CURRENT

The major components4,000,000 units (the ‘Units’) at a price per Unit of the Non-current Receivables include the following:

  KUSD
Restated
  KUSD
Restated
 
  9/30/2013  12/31/2012 
       
Cooperative shares  1   0 
Intercompany Loan Values during the quarter  0   0 
Other long term receivables  0   428 
Balance  1   428 

Note 13         GOODWILL

Goodwill derives from the following business acquisitions:

 30-Sep-13 Date of
first
Consolidation
  12/31/2012    Additions   Adjustments     Written off    9/30/2013  
GROUP Business Software AG 1/6/2011  18,425.6   -   -   -   18,425.60 
GROUP Business Software (UK) Ltd. 12/31/2005  2,765.1   -   -   -   2,765.10 
IDC Global, Inc. 7/25/2011  2,994.4           (2,994.4)  0.00 
Permessa Corporation 9/22/2011  2,387.4   -   -   -   2,387.40 
Pavone GmbH 1/4/2011  5,950.5   -   -   -   5,950.50 
GBS India 8/1/2012  1,731.9   -   -   -   1,731.90 
     34,254.9   -   -   -   31,260.50 

Note 14          SOFTWARE

Development costs

The costs$2.50. Each Unit is comprised of developing new software products and updating products already marketed by the Company are generally recognized as expenses in the period in which they arise. Provided they meet the conditions for capitalization as per FASB ASC 985-20-25, they are capitalized. Capitalized development costs can be attributed to the defined products. These products are technically realizable and there is(i) a target market for them.

The development costs arising in the reporting period result from the personnel costs attributed to the development work as well as overhead costs, provided that these are related to the development work and do not represent general administrative costs. The ascribable overhead costs are directly recognized.

Capitalized development costs are generally amortized over a period of three years starting with the date of marketability of the new products or major releases.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Concessions, Industrial Property Rights, Licenses

The intangible financial assets carried in this item are licenses acquired in exchange for payment.

These financial assets are measured at acquisition cost less scheduled straight-line amortization. The assets added in the scope of the cost price allocation of the business divisions acquired this year.

The useful life spans were based uniformly throughout the Company according to those used by the parent company. Scheduled amortization is performed over a period from three to ten years.

The useful life of the domain “gbs.com”, was estimated as unlimited. This is because no other legal, contractual or other factors exist which would limit its useful life. It is not systematically amortized, but rather annually. Should there exist signs indicating towards impairment it is tested for recoverability and, if necessary, written down to the amount which could be obtained for it if sold.

Amortization of concessions, industrial property and similar rights and assets, as well as licenses to such rights and assets are presented in the Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Income/Loss within Cost of Goods Sold.

Concessions and licenses
kUSD
 Development
of the cost
  Development
of
accumulated
depreciation
  Balance 
          

12/31/2012

  31,913.9   21,341   10572.9 
Additions  907   159     
Disposals  1,018   122     
Currency differences  143   126     
Reclassifications  0   0     
9/30/2013  31,913.9   21,341.0   10,572.9 

Note 15        OTHER ASSETS

The balance of this account of 132 KUSD primarily includes rent and other security deposits (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 156 KUSD).

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Note 16        LIABILITIES TO BANKS – CURRENT

Included in this account of 3,888 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 7 KUSD) is primarily an operating line of creditof GROUP AG.

Note 17       ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

Trade payables

As of the financial statement date, trade accounts payable amounted to 2,061 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 3,095 KUSD). Trade payables are carried at their repayment amount and all have a residual term of up to one year.

Other Accrual

Other provisions are created as of the financial statement date in an amount necessary according to a reasonable commercial appraisal, to cover future payment obligations, perceivable risks and uncertain liabilities of the Company. Amounts deemed to be most likely to occur, in careful assessment, are accrued.

  12/31/2012  9/30/2013 
  KUSD  KUSD 
Tax provision  53   21 
Salary  861   599 
Vacation  315   247 
Workers Compensation Insurance Association  25   20 
Compensation Levy for Non-Employment of Severely Handicapped Persons  19   13 
Outstanding Invoices  1,059   196 
Annual accounting and consulting  128   109 
Other Provisions  446   465 
Warranties  96   82 
Provision for Legal Costs  73   68 
Severance  70   64 
Total  3,147   1,885 

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Provisions for salaries of 599 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 861 KUSD) include the provisions created for the variable salaries of the sales staff for the sales objectives reached in this business period.

Vacation provisions of 247 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 315 KUSD) include the obligations of GROUP’s companies to their employees for remaining vacation claims from the reporting period. The amount of the provision is calculated on the gross salary of the individual employee plus the employer contribution to social security/Medicare and based on the unused vacation days as of the financial statement date.

Other employment of 97 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 114 KUSD) were accrued for severance and compensation insurance and compensation levy.

For liabilities not yet settled, a provision totaling 196 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 1059 KUSD) was created.

Other Provisions of 465 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 446 KUSD) include miscellaneous provisions.

Expenses of accounting and other external consultingconvertible promissory note convertible into common stock of the Company, were recognized at 109 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 128 KUSD).

A provision for anticipated legal consulting(ii) a warrant to purchase one share of 68 KUSD was recorded (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 73 KUSD).

For warranty claims, a provision of 82 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 96 KUSD) was created determined by service income.

Note 18       DEFERRED INCOME

Accruals for future periods leading to realization of sales after the financial statement date are reported under deferred income. The deferred income items listed ascommon stock of the financial statement date inCompany (the ‘Class A Warrant’); and (iii) a second warrant to purchase common stock of the amountCompany (the “Class B Warrant”).

In May 2021, the Company issued and sold 29,978 Units at a price of 6,847 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 6,100 KUSD) primarily include maintenance income collected in advance$2.50 per Unit for gross proceeds of $74,945, consisting of Notes of $74,945, Class A Warrants for the period after the endpurchase of the financial statement date. They are amortized on a straight-line basis over their respective contract terms.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Note 19        OTHER SHORT TERM LIABILITIES

Other short-term liabilities of 242 KUSD (December 31, 2012 restated year end: 860 KUSD) and includes miscellaneous short term obligations including amounts due on business assets

Note 20         COMMON STOCK

The Company has authorized capital of 75,000,00029,978 shares of common stock and Class B Warrants for the purchase of 29,978 shares of common stock. The Company incurred related issuance costs of $6,745 which will be amortized over the term of the Notes.

In July 2021, the Company issued and sold 440,000 Units under the Unit Purchase Program for gross proceeds of $1,100,000. The Units included Notes for $1,100,000, Class A Warrants for 440,000 shares of common stock and Class B Warrants for 440,000 shares of common stock.

September 2021 Amended Unit Purchase Agreement

On September 29, 2021, due to a lower common stock price, the Company, with the consent of all Unit holders, amended the May 2021 Unit Agreements. By rescinding their investment, the Unit holders agreed to amend the Unit Purchase Agreement resulted in the following significant changes to the offering:

(i)Decreased the offering price under the Unit Purchase Agreement from $2.50 per Unit to $2.25 per Unit for all future sales under the Unit Purchase Agreement. No proceeds from the initial investment were returned.
(ii)Decreased the conversion price from $2.50 per share to $2.25 per share for all current Unit holders and all future investors
(iii)Cancelled all Class A Warrants and Class B Warrants and replaced them with Class C Warrants.

December 2021 Unit Purchase Agreement

On December 21, 2021, the Company entered into a Unit Purchase Agreement (the “December UPA”) to sell up to 9,714,286 Units at a price per unit of $1.75. Each Unit is comprised of (i) a convertible promissory note convertible into common stock of the Company at an initial conversion price of $1.75 and, (ii) a warrant to purchase two shares of Common Stock at an initial purchase price of $2.25 per share (the new Class C Warrant). Under this December UPA, the Company issued and sold 3,438,572 Units at a per unit purchase price of $1.75, for gross proceeds of $6,000,000. Coinciding with this December UPA, the Company also entered into an Exchange Agreement with the existing Unit holders (the December 2021 Exchange Agreements, as further described below).

December 2021 Exchange Agreements

On December 21, 2021, in conjunction with a $6.0 million investment, the Company and the existing Unit holders agreed to exchange the original securities (“Old Securities”) held by the current investors/unit holders for New Securities, consisting of (i) a New Note in the principal amount equal to the original principal amount of the Original Note, plus all accrued interest through the day prior to December 21, 2021, and (ii) a New Warrant (new Class C Warrants) in exchange for the original Class C Warrants. The Exchange of the Original Securities for the New Securities included the following significant changes:

(i)Decreased the offering price under the Unit Purchase Agreement from $2.25 per Unit to $1.75 per Unit. Outstanding principal and accrued interest were used to purchase Units at the new per unit price.
(ii)Extended the maturity date of the notes to December 21, 2023 for all existing notes.
(iii)Decreased the conversion price from $2.25 per share to $1.75 per share for the New Units.
(iv)Original Class C Warrants were exchanged for New Class C warrants with an exercise price of $2.25 per share (unchanged) and a five-year life measured from the date of the Exchange Agreement. The decrease in the Unit price also resulted in additional number of New Class C Warrants being issued in exchange for the Original Class C Warrants due to the 200% warrant coverage provided for in the Unit Purchase Agreement.

The Company determined that the terms of the New Securities were substantially different from the Original Securities, and, as such the exchange of the Original Securities for the New Securities was accounted for as an extinguishment of debt on December 21, 2021, and the New Securities accounted for as a new debt issuance.

As a result of this substantial modification, the total of 621,087 Units previously issued were replaced with an aggregate of 832,022 pro-rata Units.

During the six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company issued additional 3,322,929 units under the New Securities agreement for the gross proceeds of $5,815,138. Of the total 3,322,929 Units issued: (i) 159,245 Units were issued to settle notes payable assumed on acquisition of My Health Logic (Note 4), (ii) 22,857 Units were issued to settle accounts payable, and 171,428 Units were issued in exchange for services rendered to the Company in the six months ended June 30, 2022.

13

The Company determined that the optional and automatic conversion feature and the share redemption feature attached to the convertible notes meet the definition of derivative liabilities and that the detachable warrants issued do not meet the definition of a liability and therefore will be accounted for as an equity instrument.

The fair value of the warrants issued in the six months ended June 30, 2022, of $3,461,042 (December 31, 2021 - $4,299,649) and the fair value of derivative liabilities of $1,938,379 issued (December 31, 2021 - $2,485,346) have been recorded as debt discount and are being amortized to interest and accretion expense using the effective interest method over the term of the Convertible Notes.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company recognized interest and accretion expense of $524,884 and $816,881, respectively (June 30, 2021 - $4,189 and $4,189, respectively) in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

SCHEDULE OF CONVERTIBLE NOTES

     
Convertible Notes, Net of Debt Discount   
Balance, December 31, 2021 $26,065 
Convertible notes issued - new securities  5,815,138 
Issuance costs  (415,717)
Debt discount  (5,399,421)
Debt accretion  816,881 
Balance, June 30, 2022 $842,946 

As of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company had the following convertible notes, net of debt discount outstanding:

SCHEDULE OF CONVERTIBLE NOTES NET OF DEBT DISCOUNT

  June 30, 2022  December 31, 2021 
Convertible notes - total principal $13,271,177  $7,482,104 
Unamortized issuance costs and discount  (12,428,231)  (7,456,039)
Convertible notes, net of debt discount $842,946  $26,065 

Convertible Notes Terms

The Convertible Notes mature in 24 months from the initial closing date and accrue 10% of simple interest per annum on the outstanding principal amount. The Convertible Notes principal and accrued interest can be converted at any time at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $1.75 per share (previously $2.25 per the September 2021 Amendment and originally $2.50 per the May Unit Purchase Agreement). In the event the Company consummates, while the Convertible Note is outstanding, an equity financing with a gross aggregate amount of securities sold of not less than $10,000,000 (“Qualified Financing”), then all outstanding principal, together with all unpaid accrued interest under the Convertible Notes, shall automatically convert into shares of the equity financing at the lesser of (i) 75% of the cash price per share paid in the financing and the conversion price of $1.75 per unit. The Convertible Notes are secured by a first priority security interest in all assets of the Company.

New Class C Warrants Terms

Exercise price is the lower of (i) $2.25 per share, or (ii) the Automatic Conversion Price (the lesser of (i) 75% of the cash price per share paid by the other purchasers of next round securities in the Qualified Financing and (ii) the Conversion Price ($2.25, subject to Customary Antidilution Adjustments).
Exercisable for a period of 5 years from issuance.
Warrant Coverage: 200%.

NOTE 8 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

a)Preferred stock

The Company is authorized to issue a total number of 25,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock each with a par value of $0.001. No class$0.001. As of June 30, 2022, and December 31, 2021, there were 0 shares of preferred stock has been designatedissued or issued. Asoutstanding.

b)Common stock

The Company is authorized to issue a total number of September 30, 2013, there were shares 30,837,624 of common stock outstanding. At the time of the Reverse Merger of the Company by GROUP on January 6, 2011, there were 16,500,00075,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of the Company outstanding$0.001.

As of June 30, 2022, and as the Reverse Merger was accounted for as a recapitalizationDecember 31, 2021, there were 40,828,188 and applied retroactively, this balance is recorded as the balance outstanding since inception.

Transactions occurring in 2012

·In March, 2012 another investor exercised their private purchase warrant and bought 5,000 shares of common stock for net proceeds of $7,500.

·Also in March, 2012, as a result of purchasing warrants at nominal value, wherein each warrant allowed the holder to purchase one common share at $0.50 for a period of three years, certain investors exercised those warrants and bought 900,000 shares of common stock for net proceeds of $450,000.

·On April 16, 2012, the Company sold 120,000 Units to Joerg Ott, the then Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, for a price of $1.50 per Unit, for a total purchase price of $180,000. Each Unit consisted of one share of Common Stock of the Company and one warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock of the Company from the date of issuance until the third anniversary date of the date of issuance for $1.50 per share. The Company sold the Units and underlying securities to Mr. Ott in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

·On April 28, 2012, $632,500 in notes payable were converted at $1.15 per unit into 550,000 units with each unit consisting of one common share of common stock and one warrant. Each warrant allows the holder to purchase one common share at $1.75 for a period of three years. The Company issued the Note pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) under the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

·On April 30, 2012, $460,000 in notes payable to Lotus Holdings Ltd. (“Lotus Holdings”) were converted at $1.15 per unit into 400,000 units, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant. Each warrant allows the holder to purchase one common share at $1.75 for a period of three years. The Company issued the Lotus Note pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) under the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

·Also on April 30, 2012, $172,500 in debt to a company owned by Joerg Ott, the then Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, were converted at $1.15 per unit into 150,000 units, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock and one warrant. Each warrant allows the holder to purchase one common share at $1.75 for a period of three years. The Company issued the debt pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) under the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

·On May 10, 2012, the Company sold 30,000 Units to Markus R. Ernst, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, for a purchase price of $1.50 per unit, for a total purchase price of $45,000. Each unit consists of one share of common stock of the Company and one warrant, allowing the holder to purchase one share of common stock of the Company from the date of issuance until the third anniversary date of the date of issuance for $1.50 per share. The Company sold the units and underlying securities to Mr. Ernst in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

·On May 15, 2012, the Company issued 150,000 unregistered shares of common stock to Kjell Jahn, the former selling stockholder of GroupWare, AG, a Florida corporation purchased by the Company in June 2011. The Company issued the shares in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

·On July 5, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Mohammad A. Shihadah, a member of the Board. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Company issued a convertible promissory note, dated July 5, 2012 (the “Note”), to Mr. Shihadah for the principal amount of $50,000, bearing interest at a rate of 8% per year and maturing on the earlier of the first anniversary date of the date of issuance or such other time as described in more detail in the Note.

The Note was convertible in full at $0.50 per share into common stock of the Company if this conversion was exercised on or before September 30, 2012. If not exercised, Mr. Shihadah would receive a 3-year warrant to purchase shares at 50,00040,528,188 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share.

The conversion was not exercised by Septemberissued and outstanding, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, therefore, as per2022, the termsof the Loan Agreement Mr. Shihadah wasCompany issued a 3-year warrant to purchase shares at 50,000300,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share.for exercise of warrants.

14

c)·Options

On May 18, 2021, our Board of Directors approved the Marizyme, Inc. Amended and Restated 2021 Stock Incentive Plan (“SIP”). The SIP incorporates stock options issued prior to May 18, 2021. The SIP authorized 5,300,000 options for issuance. As of June 30, 2022, there remains 899,057 options available for issuance (December 31, 2021 – 1,274,057).

During the six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company granted 400,000 (December 31, 2021 – 1,532,500) share purchase options to directors of the Company.

The summary of option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2022, is as follows:

SCHEDULE OF STOCK OPTION ACTIVITY

  

Number of

Options

  

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

  

Weighted

Average

Contractual

Life

  

Total

Intrinsic

Value

 
Outstanding at December 31, 2020  3,800,943  $1.36   8.82     
Granted  1,532,500   1.51         
Forfeited  (1,682,500)  1.36         
Outstanding at December 31, 2021  3,650,943  $1.24   8.34  $1,951,117 
Granted  400,000   2.20   9.95   196,000 
Outstanding at June 30, 2022  4,050,943   1.33   8.05   5,505,984 
Exercisable at June 30, 2022  2,970,111  $1.13   7.52  $4,629,586 

As of June 30, 2022, the Company had the following options outstanding:

SCHEDULE OF OPTIONS OUTSTANDING AND EXERCISABLE

Exercise Price  Number of
Options Outstanding
  Number of
Options
Exercisable
  Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Years
  Intrinsic Value 
$1.01   1,985,943   1,985,943   6.93  $3,336,384 
 1.25   665,000   584,168   8.60   957,600 
 1.37   200,000   200,000   8.14   264,000 
 1.75   800,000   200,000   9.41   752,000 
 2.20   400,000   -   9.95   196,000 
$1.33   4,050,943   2,970,111   8.05  $5,505,984 

d)On July 5, 2012,Restricted Share Units

As of June 30, 2022, we determined that the following performance condition attached to the restricted share awards granted in the fiscal 2021 were more likely than not to be achieved:

The Company entered into a convertible promissory note agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with K Group Ltd. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Company issued a convertible promissory note, dated July 5, 2012 (the “Note”), to K Group Ltd.will raise financing for the principal amountgross proceeds that equal or exceed $5,000,000, and
The Company will complete valuation reports for acquisition of $250,000, bearing interest at a rate of 8.5% per yearSomah and maturing on the earlier of the first anniversary date of the date of issuance or such other time as described in more detail in the Note.My Health Logic.

Notes to

Therefore, compensation cost of $295,750 for the Interim Financial Statementsrestricted share awards was recognized in stock-based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2022 (June 30, 2021 - $Nil).

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

The Note was convertible in full at $0.50 per share into common stock of the Company if this conversion was exercised on or before September 30, 2012. If not exercised, K Group Ltd. would receive a 3-year warrant to purchase shares at 250,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share.

The conversion was not exercised by September 30, 2012, therefore, as per the terms of the Loan Agreement K Group was issued a 3-year warrant to purchase shares at 250,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share.

e)·On July 5, 2012, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Vitamin B Venture GmbH. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Company issued a convertible promissory note, dated July 5, 2012 (the “Note”), to Vitamin B Venture GmbH for the principal amount of $252,500, bearing interest at a rate of 8.5% per year and maturing on the earlier of the first anniversary date of the date of issuance or such other time as described in more detail in the Note.Warrants

The Note was convertible in full at $0.50 per share into common stockAs of June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, there are 19,255,465 and 12,144,838 warrants outstanding, respectively.

SCHEDULE OF WARRANTS OUTSTANDING

  Number  Weighted Average
Price
 
December 31, 2020  3,393,651  $4.63 
Issued pursuant to Unit Purchase Agreement  8,521,187   2.25 
Issued  230,000   1.39 
December 31, 2021  12,144,838  $2.90 
Issued pursuant to Unit Purchase Agreement  6,645,866   2.25 
Issued  878,398   1.16 
Exercised  (300,000)  0.01 
Expired  (113,637)  3.00 
June 30, 2022  19,255,465  $2.64 

During the Company if this conversion was exercised on or before Septembersix months ended June 30, 2012. If not exercised Vitamin B Venture GmbH would receive a 3-year warrant to purchase shares at 250,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share.

The conversion was not exercised by September 30, 2012, therefore, as per the terms of the Loan Agreement Vitamin B Venture GmbH was issued a 3-year warrant to purchase shares at 250,000 shares of common stock at $1.00 per share.

·On August 13, 2012, the Company entered into a note purchase and security agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with John A. Moore, a member of the Board. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Company issued a secured promissory note, dated October 26, 2012 (the “Note”), to Mr. Moore for the principal amount of $1,000,000, bearing interest at a rate of 20% per year and maturing on the earlier of the first anniversary date of the date of issuance or such other time as described in more detail in the Note, without any penalty for prepayment. To secure the obligations of the Company under the Note, the Company granted Mr. Moore a secured priority security interest in the Company’s Accounts Receivable and its subsidiaries located in the United States of America, as more fully described in the full text of the document.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

In connection with the execution of the Loan Agreement, on October 26, 2012,2022, the Company issued the Lender a common stock purchase warrant (the “Warrant”), pursuant to which the Lender is entitledfollowing:

On January 26 and February 14, 2022, in exchange for services of Mr. Richmond, we granted him 300,000 warrants to purchase 100,000an aggregate 300,000 shares of Marizyme’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 until the third anniversary date of the date of issuance. The Warrant was issued in a private transaction between the Company and the Lender and was exempt from registration under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) thereof.

In connection with the Loan Agreement, on February 22, 2013, the Company and Mr. Moore amended the Note pursuant to which Mr. Moore agreed to convert the interest due under the Note into shares of GBSX common stock at a rate of $0.30$0.01 per share. PursuantThe warrants issued had an average term of 5 years, vested immediately, and were fair valued at $568,677 and recorded in salary expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2022. On March 15, 2022, Mr. Richmond exercised 300,000 warrants issued to the amendment,him.

15

On June 26, 2022, the Company issued 450,960additional 347,039 warrants to Mr. Richmond and 231,359 warrants to Univest Securities, LLC to purchase an aggregate 578,398 shares of Common Stock to Mr. Moore. The Company issued the shares in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

·On October 26, 2012, the Company entered into a note purchase and security agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Stephen D. Baksa, a member of the Board. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Company issued a secured promissory note, dated October 26, 2012 (the “Note”), to Mr. Baksa for the principal amount of $1,000,000, bearing interest at a rate of 20% per year and maturing on the earlier of the first anniversary date of the date of issuance or such other time as described in more detail in the Note, without any penalty for prepayment. To secure the obligations of the Company under the Note, the Company granted the Baksa a first priority security interest in all of the Company’s right, title and interest in and to the shares of IDC Global, Inc. then owned by the Company. The Note contains customary provisions upon an Event of Default, as more fully described in the full text of the document.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

In connection with the execution of the Loan Agreement, on October 26, 2012, the Company issued the Lender a common stock purchase warrant (the “Warrant”), pursuant to which the Lender is entitled to purchase 500,000 shares ofMarizyme’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 until$1.75 per share. The warrants issued had an average term of 5 years, vested immediately, and were fair valued at $1,281,854, of which $769,113 was recorded in salary expense and $512,471 in professional fees in the third anniversary datecondensed consolidated statements of operations for the date of issuance. The Warrant was issued in a private transaction betweensix months ended June 30, 2022.

In the Company and the Lender and was exempt from registration under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933, as amended,six months ended June 30, 2022, pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) thereof. On February 12, 2013, Mr. Baksa exercised the right to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock at the exercise price of $0.20.

In connection with the Loan Agreement, on February 22, 2013, the Company and Mr. Baksa amended the Note pursuant to which Mr. Baksa agreed to convert the interest due under the Note into shares of GBSX common stock at a rate of $0.30 per share. Pursuant to the amendment, the Company issued 200,000 shares of Common Stock to Mr. Baksa. The Company issued the shares in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities

Transactions occurring in 2013

·As stated above, on February 12, 2013, and in connection with the above October 26, 2012 Loan Agreement the Company issued an aggregate of 500,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to Board Member, Stephen Baksa pursuant to exercise of a common stock purchase warrant issued on October 26, 2012 and exercisable for $0.20 per share. The Company issued the securities in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

·On February 12, 2013, the Company sold an aggregate of 250,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to an Accredited Investor (as that term is defined the Securities Act) pursuant to exercise of a common stock purchase warrant issued on November 30, 2012 and exercisable for $0.20 per share. The Company issues the securities in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

As of March 31, 2013, these shares had not yet been issued and remain as Subscriptions Receivable.

·As stated above, on February 22, 2013 and in connection with the above August 13, 2012 Loan Agreement, the Company and Board Member, John Moore amended the Note pursuant to which Mr. Moore agreed to convert the interest due under the Note into shares of GBSX common stock at a rate of $0.30 per share. Pursuant to the amendment, the Company issued 450,960 shares of Common Stock to Mr. Moore. The Company issued the shares in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

·As stated above, on February 22, 2013, and in connection with the above October 26, 2012 Loan Agreement, the Company and Board Member Stephen Baksa amended the Note pursuant to which Mr. Baksa agreed to convert the interest due under the Note into shares of GBSX common stock at a rate of $0.30 per share. Pursuant to the amendment, the Company issued 200,000 shares of Common Stock to Mr. Baksa. The Company issued the shares in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

·On March 20, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 450,950 restricted shares of Common Stock to Board Member, John Moore pursuant to a February 22, 2013 amendment to a Secured Promissory Note Agreement entered into on August 13, 2012 between the Company and the Board Member. The Company issued the securities in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

·On March 27, 2013, the Company issued an aggregate of 200,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to Board Member, Stephen Baksa pursuant to a February 22, 2013 amendment to a Secured Promissory Note Agreement entered into on October 26, 2012 between the Company and the Board Member. The Company issued the securities in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

·On March 27, 2013, the Company issued 200,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to a third party non-affiliated consultant in consideration for consulting services rendered by the consultant to the Company. The Company issued the securities in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

·On April 26, 2013, the Company entered into a note purchase and security agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Stephen D. Baksa (the “Lender’), a member of the Board. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Company issued a secured promissory note, dated April 26, 2013 (the “Note”), to Mr. Baksa for the principal amount of $200,000, bearing interest at a rate of 2% per month and maturing on June 30, 2013 or such other time as described in more detail in the Note, without any penalty for prepayment. This Note is secured by fifty percent (50%) of certain financial holdbacks to the Company pursuant to the StockUnit Purchase Agreement dated February 1, 2013, by and among the Company, IDC Global, Inc. and Global Telecom & Technology Americas, Inc. The Company issued the Note upon reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly 4(2)) of the Securities Act in light of the fact it was a private transaction and did not involve a public offering of securities.

§In connection with the execution of the Loan Agreement, on April 29, 2013, the Company issued the Lender a common stock purchase warrant (the “Warrant”), pursuant to which the Lender is entitled to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 from May 1, 2013 until April 30, 2016. The Warrant was issued in a private transaction between the Company and the Lender and was exempt from registration under the Securities pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) thereof.

§In connection with the execution of the Loan Agreement, on April 29, 2013, the Company issued the Lender a conditional common stock purchase warrant (the “Conditional Warrant”) which is exercisable in the event that Note is not paid in full by June 30, 2013, pursuant to which the Lender is entitled to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 from July 1, 2013 until June 30, 2016 as described more fully in the Note. The Conditional Warrant was issued in a private transaction between the Company and the Lender and was exempt from registration under the Securities Act, pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) thereof.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

·On April 26, 2013, the Company entered into a note purchase and security agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Vitamin B Venture GmbH (the “Lender”), an entity of which Joerg Ott, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, has voting and dispositive control. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Company issued to the Lender a secured promissory note, dated October 26, 2012 (the “Note”), for the principal amount of $200,000, bearing interest at a rate of 2% per month and maturing on June 30, 2013 or such other time as described in more detail in the Note, without any penalty for prepayment. This Note is secured by fifty percent (50%) of certain financial holdbacks to be paid to the Company pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated February 1, 2013, by and among the Company, IDC Global, Inc. and Global Telecom & Technology Americas, Inc. The Company issued the Note upon reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly 4(2)) of the Securities Act in light of the fact it was a private transaction and did not involve a public offering of securities.

§In connection with the execution of the Loan Agreement, on April 29, 2013, the Company issued the Lender a common stock purchase warrant (the “Warrant”), pursuant to which the Lender is entitled to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 from May 1, 2013 until April 30, 2016. The Warrant was issued in a private transaction between the Company and the Lender and was exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) thereof.

§In connection with the execution of the Loan Agreement, on April 29, 2013, the Company issued the Lender a conditional common stock purchase warrant (the “Conditional Warrant”) which is exercisable in the event that Note is not paid in full by June 30, 2013, pursuant to which the Lender is entitled to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 from July 1, 2013 until June 30, 2016 as described more fully in the Note. The Conditional Warrant was issued in a private transaction between the Company and the Lender and was exempt from registration under the Securities Act, pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) thereof.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

·On August 6, 2013, the Company issued 25,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to a third party non-affiliated consultant in consideration for consulting services rendered by the consultant to the Company. The Company issued the securities in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

Other changes in common stock are disclosed in Note 23, Supplementary Cash Flow Disclosures.

Options

The Company has not issued any options, so that none are outstanding as of September 30, 2013.

Warrants

The Company has issued warrants in four different manners. In each instance, the warrant allows the holder to purchase a common share within a three year period from issuance at a specific price per share. In the first instance, warrants have been issued as part of a private placement offering wherein the investor purchases a common share, and a warrant. The fair value of those warrants has been determined (and is shown below) by utilizing the residual method, whereby the current market value of the stock is deducted from the unit price and the remainder is allocated to the warrant. The valuation of the warrants issued is for disclosure purposes only and has no impact to the financial statements. A description of those warrants has been described above under common shares.

The second manner in which warrants are issues is in respect to financing by way of the issuance of notes payable or the conversion of debt into shares. In these instances, the fair value of the warrant has been determined using the effective interest rate method whereby the note is discounted when the interest rate is less than other similar notes and discount is allocated to the warrant and credited to additional paid in capital. The corresponding charge to discount is then amortized over the life of the note. Where there is no difference in interest terms, no value is attributable to the warrant.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

The Company has also sold warrants at nominal value to certain investors. In this instance the fair value of the warrants has been determined using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with volatility, equity value and interest rate inputs noted below. The valuation of the warrants issued is for disclosure purposes only and has no impact to the financial statements.

Lastly, the Company has issued warrants to outside consultants in payments for services. The warrants are issued as “cashless” warrants and have been valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with volatility, equity value and interest rate inputs noted below.. The fair value of warrants issued for financing are determined for disclosure purposes as there is no impact to the financial statements. The fair value for other services, namely legal, and consulting have been recorded in the financial statements with a charge to the corresponding expense account and a credit to additional paid in capital.

Black Scholes assumptions for warrants issued were as follows:

  For the Period Ending
September 30,
 
  2013  2012 

Annualized Volatility

  120.26%  118.64%
Risk Free  Interest Rate  0.66%  0.40%
Expected Life  3 years   3 years 
Dividend Rate  Nil   Nil 

The following share purchase warrant transactions have not been disclosed elsewhere.

On April 1, 2011, the former CFO was issued 100,000 share purchase warrants, which gave him the option of purchasing 100,000 shares of common stock for a period of 3 years at a price of $1.50 per common share. The value of this issuance, using the Black Scholes pricing model was determined to $34,000 and this amount was recorded as a consulting expense.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

In March 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 2,020,0006,645,866 additional New Class C warrants to five “accredited investors” pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2))with an exercise price of the Securities Act. Each investor warrant is exercisable for the three-year period commencing from the date of issuance for $0.50$2.25 per share and a term of Common Stockfive years.

f)Stock-based compensation

During the three and has the same terms as the Private Placement Warrants. As noted above investors immediately exercised warrants and purchased 900,000 shares of common stock for $450,000.On March 27, 2012,six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company issuedrecorded $676,242 and $1,392,674 in non-cash share-based compensation in the stock-based compensation line on the condensed consolidated statements of operations, respectively (June 30, 2021 - $194,657 and $562,375, respectively). As of June 30, 2022, there was $2,154,935 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation awards. The unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.85 years.

NOTE 9 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

As at June 30, 2022, the Company owed an aggregate of 250,000 warrants$223,661 (December 31, 2021 - $1,132,634) to 3 outside consultants pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2))related parties of the Securities Act. Each warrant is exercisable for the three-year period commencing from the date of issuance for $1.10 per share of Common Stock and has the same terms as the Private Placement Warrants.Company. The value of this issuance, using the Black Scholes pricing model was determined to $270,208 and this amount was recorded as a professional expense.

In December 2012, The Company issued 16,875 warrants to an outside consultant pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2))majority of the Securities Act. Each warrant is exercisable for the three-year period commencing from the date of issuance for $0.21 per share of Common Stockbalance was owed to Mr. Frank Maresca, a related party and has the same terms as the Private Placement Warrants. The value of this issuance, using the Black Scholes pricing model was determined to $2,624 and this amount was recorded as a consulting expense.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

  # of shares         Fair value        Balance 
  allowed to  Issue Expiry Strike  at        End of 
  purchase   Date  Date  Price  Issuance   Issued   Exercised  Period 
         $  $  #  #  # 
                       
                             
Opening - Jan 1, 2012  6,846,280                   5,000   6,841,280 
Amended  (2,000,000) 10/1/2010 6/1/2013  4.00   -   -   -   - 
Reissued  2,000,000  6/1/2012 6/1/2015  1.00   556,785   -   -   - 
Issued for legal services     3/31/2012 3/31/2012  1.10   270,208(2)  250,000   -   250,000 
Issued for nominal value     3/28/2012 3/28/2015  0.50   2,457,662   2,020,000   900,000   1,120,000 
Sold with share units     4/16/2012 4/16/2015  1.50   90,000   120,000   -   120,000 
Issued with debt conversion     4/28/2012 4/28/2015  1.75   -   550,000   -   550,000 
Issued with debt conversion     4/30/2012 4/30/2015  1.75   -   500,000   -   500,000 
Sold with share units     5/10/2012 5/10/2015  1.50   25,800   30,000   -   30,000 
Issued with debt     7/5/2012 7/5/2012  0.50   26,500   550,000   -   550,000 
Issued with debt     8/13/2012 8/13/2015  0.35   -   100,000   100,000   100,000 
Issued with debt     10/26/2012 10/29/2015  0.20   -   500,000   500,000   - 
Issued with debt     11/30/2012 11/30/2015  0.20   -   500,000   250,000   250,000 
Issued for consulting services     12/21/2012 12/21/2015  0.21   2,624(1)  16,875   -   16,875 
Closing - Dec 31, 2012                  5,136,875   1,755,000   10,328,155 
                             
Opening - Jan 1, 2013  10,328,155                       10,328,155 
Transfer (3/11/2011)  739,000  2/6/2013 3/11/2014  1.50   -   -   -   739,000 
Closing - Mar 31, 2013                  5,136,875   1,755,000   11,067,155 
                             
Issued with debt     4/26/2013 4/26/2016  0.25   -   400,000   -   400,000 
Closing - Jun 30, 2013                  5,536,875   1,755,000   11,467,155 
                             
Closing - September 30, 2013                  5,536,875   1,755,000   11,467,155 

(1) recorded as consulting expense

(2) recorded as legal expense

Note 21        REVENUE ALLOCATION

Gross revenue may be broken down by the following products for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 are as follows:

Sales Revenues9/30/2013
KUSD
Licenses2,605
Maintenance7,500
Service2,443
Third-Party Products1,736
LND Third-Party Products1,330
Others0
15,613

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Revenues by geographical area for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 are as follows:

Sales Revenues9/30/2013
by geographic areaKUSD
US2,550
Germany12,370
United Kingdom678
Others15
15,613

Note 22          OTHER INCOME/EXPENSE

At the financial statement date, Other income was 20 KUSD (December 31, 2012 year end: Other Expense 33 KUSD).

42

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

Note 23          SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES

The significant non-cash transactions through September 30, 2013 were as follows:

·On April 1, 2011, the Company acquired Pavone AG, for 350 KUSD, assumption of $583,991 debt and 1,000,000 shares of its common stock.
·On June 1, 2011, the Company acquired GroupWare, Inc., for 250 KUSD, assumption of $694,617 debt and 250,000 shares of its common stock.
·On July 25, 2011, the Company acquired IDC Global, Inc. for 750 KUSD, $ 883,005 assumption of debt, 25 (KUSD) reimbursement for accounting and legal fees, 35 KUSD signing bonuses and 880,000 shares of common stock.
·On September 27, 2011, the Company acquired SD Holdings Ltd for $525,529 and issued 612,874 shares of Common Stock.
·On February 27, 2012, an outstanding debt of GROUP was converted into an aggregate of 1,750,000 shares of GROUP common stock, increasing GROUP’s total outstanding common stock to 26,982,000 shares. As a result of the foregoing increase in the number of total outstanding shares of GROUP common stock, the Company increased its ownership of GROUP common stock to an aggregate of 13,525,000 shares, representing approximately 50.1% of the outstanding common stock of GROUP, by purchasing the 883,765 shares of GROUP common stock from GAVF LLC for an average purchase price of $0.70 per share.
·On March 31, 2012, warrants were issued in lieu of consulting services and the fair value, based on the Black Scholes pricing model, was determined to be $ 270,208 and recorded as Additional Paid-In Capital.
·On April 28, 2012, $ 632,500 in notes payable to RealRisk Ventures, LL were converted into 550,000 shares of common stock and into 550,000 warrants with each warrant allowing the holder to purchase one common share at $1.75 for a period of 3 years.
·On April 30, 2012, $ 460,000 in notes payable to Lotus Holdings Ltd. were converted into 400,000 shares of common stock and 400,000 warrants, with each warrant allowing the holder to purchase one common share at $1.75 for a period of 3 years.
·On April 30, 2012 $ 172,500 of accounts payable due to Vitamin B Venture, GmbH was converted into 150,000 shares of common stock in satisfaction of a converted note to Kjell Jahn.
·On July 5, 2012, promissory notes for $552,500 were issued at 8.5% and had a conversion feature. Similar notes without the conversion were issued at 20%. Therefore, it was determined that the conversion feature had a value which was calculated by discounting the note as if the cost of capital was 20% and based on the due date set forth of 6 months. The calculated value was classified as discounted debt and amortized over the life of the promissory notes resulting in additional Interest expense and a credit to Additional Paid-In Capital for $26,700.

Notes to the Interim Financial Statements

September 30, 2013

GBS Enterprises Incorporated

Unaudited

·On December 21, 2012, warrants were issued in lieu of consulting services and the fair value, based on the Black Scholes pricing model, was determined to be $ 2,624 and recorded as Additional Paid-In Capital.

·On March 1, 2013, $700,000 of Notes Payable and Accounts Payable due to Vitamin VbV GmbH was dissolved as payment against a Loan Payable from Group AG.

·On March 20, 2013, 450,960 shares were issued at a rate of .30/share on conversion of accrued interest due on a Note Payable to John Moore.

·On March 27, 2013, 200,000 shares were issued at a rate of .30/share on conversion of accrued interest due on a Note Payable to Stephen Baksa. Also on March 27, 2013, 200,000 shares were issued in lieu of services and the fair value based on the Black Scholes pricing model, was determined to be $ 70,000 and recorded as Additional Paid-In Capital.

·On August 6, 2013, 25,000 shares were issued at a rate of .16/share in lieu of consulting services and recorded as Additional Paid-In Capital.

Note 24        SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 10, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company reappointed Joerg Ott as the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, effective immediately. Mr. Ott replaced Mr. Gary D. MacDonald who had been serving as the Company’s Interim Chief Executive Officer since July 11, 2012.

On August 2, 2013, Gary D. MacDonald resigned as member of the Board of Directorsshareholder of the Company, and as, Managing Directorcomprised of GBS-UK. From March 1, 2012the following:

The Company received consulting services from Mr. Maresca and pursuant to the agreement incurred $180,000 in professional expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2022 (June 30, 2021 - $180,000). At June 30, 2022, the Company owes a total of $221,316 for consulting services provided and service-related expenses incurred by Mr. Maresca during the period ended June 30, 2022.

In the six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company incurred and settled additional $86,400 in professional services rendered by related parties of the Company and settled $101,781 in various expenses incurred by these parties in relation to their services rendered to the date of his resignation, Mr. MacDonald also servedCompany.

Additionally, as memberpart of the Board’ Audit Committee.Somah acquisition in 2020, the Company recorded a prepaid royalty to the shareholders of Somahlution. The primary beneficial owner is Dr. Vithal Dhaduk, currently a director, and significant shareholder of the Company. As at June 30, 2022, the Company had $339,091 in prepaid royalties (December 31, 2021 - $339,091) which had been classified as non-current in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

NOTE 10 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Matters

On August 19, 2021, Dr. Neil Campbell, former President, Chief Executive Officer and director of the Company, and Bruce Harmon, former Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, each filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial against the Company and Insperity Peo Services, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Insperity”), a joint employer of Dr. Campbell and Mr. MacDonald’s resignation was not due to any disagreementHarmon with the Company orunder a Client Service Agreement, dated November 30, 2020 (collectively, the Board.

On August 13, 2012,“Campbell/Harmon Complaints”). Both Campbell/Harmon Complaints allege that the Company entered into a note purchase and security agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with John A. Moore, a memberInsperity violated Section 448.105 of the Board. Pursuant toFlorida Private Whistleblower Act as a result of the Loan Agreement,constructive terminations of Dr. Campbell and Mr. Harmon after the occurrence of violations federal and state law, including federal securities law, at the Company issued a secured promissory note, dated October 26, 2012 (the “Note”),that exposed Dr. Campbell and Mr. Harmon to Mr. Moore forcivil and criminal forms of liability and that the principal amount of $1,000,000, bearingCompany was not addressing to their satisfaction. Both Campbell/Harmon Complaints demand approximately $30,000 - $50,000 in back pay and benefits, interest at a rate of 20% per yearon back pay, front pay and/or lost earning capacity, compensatory damages, costs and maturingattorney’s fees, and such other relief as the court deems equitable. In the six months ended June 30, 2022, both cases were dismissed with prejudice and without any financial impact on the earlier of the first anniversary date of the date of issuance or such other time as described in more detail in the Note, without any penalty for prepayment. To secure the obligations of the Company under the Note, the Company granted Mr. Moore a secured priority security interest in the Company’s Accounts Receivable and its subsidiaries located in the United States of America, as more fully described in the full text of the document.Company.

Contingencies

·a.In connection with the execution of the Loan Agreement, on October 26, 2012,On July 13, 2019, the Company issuedsigned a consulting agreement, whereby the Lender a common stock purchase warrant (the “Warrant”), pursuant to which the Lender is entitledindividual will receive:

$30,000 per month through July 13, 2022,
Option to purchase 100,000 250,000 shares of common stock at an exercisea strike price of $0.35 until$1.50, which vest monthly through July 13, 2021. The vesting of these options was accelerated by the third anniversaryBoard on September 2, 2020.
Royalties based on sales of Krillase assets, equal to 10% of net sales of the product. During the six months ended June 30, 2022, no revenues were derived from sales of Krillase product.

b.As part of the DuraGraft Acquisition, completed on July 31, 2020, the Company entered into the Agreement with Somah stockholders, whereby Marizyme is legally obligated to pay royalties on all net sales for Somah, Inc. The royalties associated with the Agreement are calculated as follows:

Royalties on U.S. sales equal to:

5% on the first $50,000,000 of net sales,
4% on net sales of $50,000,001 up to $200,000,000, and
2% on net sales over $200,000,000.

16

Royalties on sales outside of the U.S.:

6% on the first $50,000,000 of net sales,
4% on net sales of $50,000,001 up to $200,000,000, and
2% on net sales over $200,000,000.

The royalties are in perpetuity. During the six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company had not earned any revenues from Krillase and did not have any sales of the DuraGraft products in U.S., therefore no royalties have been accrued or paid in the period.

Upon receiving FDA clearance for the Duragraft product, the Company will:

Issue performance warrants with a strike price determined based on the average of the closing prices of the Company’s common stock for the 30 calendar days following the date of the datepublic announcement of issuance. The Warrant was issued in a private transaction betweenthe FDA approval; and
Upon liquidation of all or substantially all of the assets relating to DuraGraft, the Company andwill pay 15% of the Lender and was exempt from registration under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, pursuantnet sale proceeds up to Section 4(2) thereof. On October 16, 2013, Mr. Moore exercised the right to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at the price of $0.35.$20 million.

c.The Company has entered into arrangements for office and laboratories spaces. As of June 30, 2022, minimum lease payments in relation to lease commitments are payable as described in Note 5.

Risks and Uncertainties

Starting in late 2019, a novel strain of the coronavirus, or COVID-19, began to rapidly spread around the world and every state in the United States. At this time, there continues to be significant volatility and uncertainty relating to the full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic and the various responses to it will impact our business, operations and financial results.

Most states and cities have at various times instituted quarantines, restrictions on travel, “stay at home” rules, social distancing measures and restrictions on the types of businesses that could continue to operate, as well as guidance in response to the pandemic and the need to contain it. As a result, the COVID-19 pandemic may affect the operations of the FDA and other health authorities, including such authorities in Europe, which could result in delays of reviews and approvals. While there have been no specific notices of delay from federal or foreign government authorities, potential interruptions, delays, or changes to the operations of the FDA, or of any foreign authority with which we might interact, might impact the approval of any applications we plan and will need to file in the future.

In addition, we are dependent upon certain contract manufacturers and suppliers and their ability to reliably and efficiently fulfill our orders is critical to our business success. The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted and may continue to impact certain of our manufacturers and suppliers. As a result, we have faced and may continue to face delays or difficulty sourcing certain products, which could negatively affect our business and financial results.

The spread of COVID-19 has also adversely impacted global economic activity and has contributed to significant volatility and negative pressure in financial markets. The pandemic has resulted, and may continue to result, in a significant disruption of global financial markets, which may reduce our ability to access capital in the future, which could negatively affect our liquidity.

If the COVID-19 pandemic does not continue to slow and the spread of COVID-19 is not contained, our business operations, including those of contract manufacturers, could be further delayed or interrupted. The duration of any business disruption cannot be reasonably estimated at this time but may materially affect our ability to operate our business and result in additional costs. It is not possible to reliably measure or quantify the impact COVID-19 has had on the financial results of the Company. If the COVID-19 pandemic continues for an extended period, it may materially adversely impact business operations and, consequently, future financial results.

NOTE 11 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Reverse Stock Split

On October 23, 2013,August 1, 2022, the Company filedBoard of Directors (the “Board”) of Marizyme approved a lawsuit (GBS Enterprises, Inc. v. Reliance Globalcom, Inc.) in the Superior Courtreverse stock split of the StateCompany’s common stock at a ratio of California, County of San Francisco, seeking a declaratory judgment that 1-for-4 (the Company has no obligation to Reliance Globalcom Inc. (“Reliance”“Reverse Stock Split”) for any claims or liabilities in connection with a Master Services Agreementproposed Nasdaq listing. The Reverse Stock Split will become effective after the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“MSA”FINRA”) executed by Relianceapproval and IDC Global Inc. (“IDC”) a then wholly owned subsidiarythe Nasdaq Stock Market LLC approval of the Company in March 2010. Company’s listing application (the “Effective Date”).

On February 1, 2013, GBS sold IDC to Global Telecom & Technology Inc. (“GTT”). Pursuantthe Effective Date, the total number of shares of common stock held by each stockholder will be converted automatically into the number of whole shares of Common Stock equal to the governingnumber of issued and outstanding shares of common stock held by such stockholder immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split, divided by four.

As of August 15, 2022, there were 40,828,188 shares of common stock outstanding. As a result of the Reverse Stock Split, there will be approximately 10,207,048  shares of common stock outstanding, not including the shares of common stock that the Company expects to issue in its anticipated public offering. No fractional shares will be issued, and no cash or other consideration will be paid. Instead, the Company will issue one whole share of the post-Reverse Stock Split Common Stock to any stockholder who otherwise would have received a fractional share as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.

Final Closing of Unit Purchase Agreement

On August 12, 2022, the Company conducted the final closing of the Unit Purchase Agreement, (SPA)in which the Company issued to an investor Units consisting of a convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,500,000, GTT gained all right, titleconvertible into 857,142 shares of common stock, plus additional shares based on accrued interest, subject to adjustment, and interest in 100% of all of IDC’s stock, all of which had been owned by GBS. Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, GTT withheld $528,777.93 ofa Class C Warrant for the purchase price from paymentof 1,714,285 shares of common stock at $2.25 per share, subject to GBS to cover potential exposure due to the Identified Dispute described herein between IDC and Reliance. The Stock Purchase Agreement requires that, within three days of notice to GTT that the Identified Dispute described herein has been resolved, GTT will release the $528,777.93 to GBS. The Company is seeking declaratory relief from the Court stating the Company is not liable to Reliance and that GTT may release the $528,777.93 in funds owed to the Company. There were no material developments in this case since the filing of the lawsuit.adjustment.

17

 

The Company intends to vigorously defend its interests in this matter.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Item 2.

This discussion covers the three months (“Q2 2022” or the “Quarter”) and six months ended June 30, 2022 and the subsequent period up to the date of issuance of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the unaudited interim financial statements and notes thereto included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and with our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2021 and the related Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

The following discussion and analysis should be readOperations, both of which are contained in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes to those financial statements that are included elsewhere in the Quarterly Report. Our discussion includes forward-looking statements based upon current expectations that involve risks and uncertainties, such as our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Actual results and the timing of events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those set forth under the “Risk Factors,” “Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and “Description of Business” sections in the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 (“2021 Form 10-K”).

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 under Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and subsequent filings. WeSection 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this quarterly report, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, business strategy, research and development plans and costs, the impact of COVID-19, the timing and likelihood of regulatory filings and approvals, commercialization plans, pricing and reimbursement, the potential to develop future product candidates, the timing and likelihood of success of the plans and objectives of management for future operations, and future results of anticipated product development efforts, are forward-looking statements. These statements are often identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,“may,“estimate,” “plan,” “project,” “continuing,” “ongoing,“will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “may,” “will,“could,” “should,” “could,“estimate,“predict,or “continue,” and similar expressions to identifyor variations. The forward-looking statements. Although we believe the expectations expressedstatements in this quarterly report are only predictions. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, operating results, business strategy, short-term and long-term business operations and objectives. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this quarterly report and are based on reasonablesubject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, withinincluding those described in the bounds ofPart II, Item 1A under the heading “Risk Factors.” The events and circumstances reflected in our knowledge of our business, ourforward-looking statements may not be achieved or occur and actual results could differ materially from those discussed in these statements. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason even if new information becomes available or other events occurprojected in the future.forward-looking statements. Except as required by applicable law, we do not plan to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein, whether as a result of any new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise.

OVERVIEW

Marizyme is a multi-technology life science company dedicated to the acceleration, development and commercialization of medical technologies that promote patient health and present potential for rapid revenue growth.

Key elements of our strategy include:

Advancing development of three medical technology platforms - DuraGraft, MATLOC and Krillase – each of which is clinically tested and backed by a portfolio of patented or patent-pending assets;
Advancing DuraGraft - our endothelial damage inhibitor, or “EDI”, and MATLOC 1 - our “CKD” screening and diagnostic device, for the Food and Drug Administration De Novo classification process and 510(k) application, respectively. We filed a pre-submission letter for DuraGraft with the FDA in November 2021, and we expect to submit the DuraGraft De Novo request to the FDA in 2022;
Progressing the development of Krillase through planning an animal clinical study which will be conducted in 2022 and we expect will facilitate our entry into the pet health market and generate revenue through the sale of Krillase-based canine dental hygiene products.

We have incurred losses for each period from inception. Our net loss was approximately $6.9 million and $13.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2022, respectively ($1.6 million and $3.9 million for the three and six month ended June 30, 2021, respectively). We expect to incur significant expenses and operating losses over the next several years. Accordingly, we will need additional financing to support our continuing operations. We will seek to fund our operations through public or private equity offerings, debt financings, government or other third-party funding, collaborations and licensing arrangements. Adequate additional financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. Our failure to raise capital as and when needed would impact our going concern and would have a negative impact on our financial condition and our ability to pursue our business strategy and continue as a going concern. We will need to generate significant revenues to achieve profitability, and we may never do so.

Our Products

DuraGraft®

Through our acquisition of the Somah Assets in July 2020, we acquired key intellectual products based on a patent protected cytoprotective platform technology designed to reduce ischemic injury to organs and tissues in grafting and transplantation surgeries. These assets include DuraGraft, a one-time intraoperative vascular graft treatment, that is able to protect endothelial cells from ischemic damage and reperfusion injury, and reduce complications associated with Vein Graft Failure, or VGF, post-CABG, thereby reducing major adverse cardiac events such as repeat revascularization and myocardial infarction, reducing incidence and complications of graft failure, and improving clinical outcomes.

DuraGraft is an endothelial damage inhibitor, or EDI, indicated for cardiac bypass, peripheral bypass, and other vascular surgeries. It carries CE marking and is approved for marketing in 18 countries worldwide on three continents including, but not limited to, the securities lawsEuropean Union countries, such as Spain, Austria, and Germany, Switzerland, Philippines, Chile, and Turkey. Somah had also been focused on developing products to mitigate the effects of ischemia reperfusion injury in other grafting and transplantation surgeries and other indications in which ischemic injury can cause disease. Now, under our ownership, multiple products derived from the cytoprotective platform technology for several indications are under various stages of development.

18

According to market analysis reports, the size of the coronary artery bypass graft (“CABG”) procedures market globally was approximately $16.7 billion as of 2020 (Expert Markets Research, 2020). This market is forecast to increase at a compound annual growth rate (“CAGR”) of 2.5% between 2021 and 2026 (Expert Markets Research, 2020). Globally, it is estimated that approximately 800,000 CABG procedures are performed each year (Grand View Research, March 2017), with procedures performed in the U.S. being a substantial percentage of the total global procedures performed. In the U.S., it is estimated that approximately 340,000 CABG surgeries are performed each year. The number of CABG procedures performed is predicted to decline at a rate of approximately 0.8% per year to less than 330,000 annually by 2026, primarily due to medical and technological advances in the use of percutaneous coronary intervention, also known as “angioplasty” (idata Research, September 2018).

In 2020, the U.S. peripheral vascular device market size was valued at $7.1 billion, with over 8.26 million peripheral vascular procedures performed each year with an expected market size of $10.4 billion by 2026. The vascular device market size globally was valued at $11.9 billion in 2020 with more than 16 million yearly peripheral vascular procedures performed. The market size is expected to increase at a CAGR of 5.2% and reach $16.9 billion in 2026. (idata Research, 2020).

For 2022, our main business priority is receiving FDA clearance of DuraGraft for CABG procedures through a De Novo classification request. We also plan to finalize the development of fat grafting procedures using DuraGraft for plastic surgery procedures in the U.S. It is reported that 22.4 million such surgeries take place annually in the U.S. (American Society of Plastic Surgeons, 2020).

Following the FDA approval of DuraGraft, which we expect to obtain in 2023, we will seek to commercialize DuraGraft in the U.S. through the assistance of a strategic partner who will be responsible for marketing and sales. We will continue our DuraGraft marketing efforts in Europe relying on our DuraGraft CE marking and our distribution partners. We also intend to develop additional applications for the U.S. marketplace including, but not limited to, fat grafting for plastic surgery. The CE marking signifies that DuraGraft may be sold in the EEA and that DuraGraft has been assessed as meeting safety, health, and environmental protection requirements. We intend to strive for rapid revenue growth using multiple strategic partners and revenue channels. We expect that we will market DuraGraft internationally, through multiple distribution partners with a focus on sales to cardiac surgeons and cardiologists. We are currently working with local distributors of cardiovascular disease-related products, in accordance with local regulatory requirements, to sell and increase the market share of DuraGraft in Spain, Austria, Switzerland, Philippines, Germany, Chile, and Turkey. In the U.S., we intend to enter into a commercialization arrangement with a strategic partner who will be responsible for the marketing and sales of DuraGraft. If we are not able to find an appropriate strategic partner, we will have to build our own marketing and sales capabilities which we expect would be time consuming and costly.

MATLOC 1

On December 22, 2021, we acquired My Health Logic, its lab-on-chip technology platform and its patient-centric, digital point-of-care screening device, MATLOC 1.

The excitement over microfluidics, also known as lab-on-a-chip technology, lies in its potential for producing revolutionary, timely, accessible, and practical point-of-care devices; devices that are patient-centric (one-to-many, rather than doctor centric, one-to-one) and support self-care and independence. Microfluidics is a technology for analyzing small volumes of fluids, with the potential to miniaturize complex laboratory procedures onto a small microchip, hence the term “lab-on-chip”.

Marizyme’s lab-on-chip technology is currently being developed for screening and diagnosis related to the three leading biomarkers for chronic kidney disease, a disease estimated to affect 37 million Americans – or one out of every seven people (National Kidney Foundation, 2019). If left untreated, many patients will advance to end stage renal disease (ESRD), often leading to kidney transplant, renal failure, or dialysis. Since 90% of those with CKD do not know they have it, the risk of progression in the disease is high and this creates massive burdens for CKD patients and healthcare systems (National Kidney Foundation, 2019). CKD and ESRD costs the U.S. public healthcare systems hundreds of billions of dollars a year. In 2018 Medicare alone spent $130 billion on CKD and ESRD-related costs (National Kidney Foundation, 2019). With the increase of diabetics and hypertension cases in the U.S., which make up roughly two-thirds of all CKD patients (National Kidney Foundation, 2022), CKD related healthcare costs are expected to increase significantly. Compounding this development is the fact that less than 50% of diabetic patients, the highest at-risk group, are annually screened or tested for CKD (Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2021). This creates an unmet need for point-of-care technologies that facilitate CKD screening and diagnosis, which further facilitates earlier screening and diagnosis and detection to slow down or eliminate the CKD progression. By combining the lab-on-chip technology with Marizyme’s MATLOC 1 device, we will be able to quantitatively read the two urine biomarkers, albumin and creatine, necessary for effective CKD screening at point-of-care with results available instantly on a patient’s smartphone.

MATLOC 2, the Company’s next-generation point-of-care device in development, is designed to provide a fully integrated, quantitative diagnostic assessment of estimated glomerular filtration rate (“eGFR”), using a blood-based biomarker. eGFR is a key measure of kidney function health and/or stage of kidney disease and our MATLOC 2 device is designed to provide a fully integrated, complete diagnostic assessment for CKD, potentially eliminating the need for lab visits and in-person assessment.

The COVID-19 pandemic has massively accelerated the ongoing transformation in healthcare. Connected consumer electronic devices are enabling 24/7 home-based digital healthcare. We believe that consumers have the desire and are now becoming empowered to manage their own healthcare and that they will seek to utilize our point-of-care MATLOC 1 device.

With our MATLOC devices in development, we are striving to achieve earlier detection and slowing of the progression of CKD, allowing patients and healthcare systems to reduce the enormous costs of kidney failure, transplant, and/or dialysis. After completing the technology for CKD assessment, we plan to explore the commercial potential of other biomarkers for chronic diseases to be measured at point-of-care.

19

We are currently preparing our MATLOC 1 device for the FDA submission process with clearance anticipated by the end of 2023. More specifically, we expect to continue the advancement of MATLOC 1 through the conclusion of a clinical trial in 2022 followed by the filing with the FDA of a 510(k) notification and an expected FDA clearance of a 510(k) application by the end of 2023. Upon FDA approval, we will seek rapid revenue growth using multiple strategic partners and revenue channels.

MATLOC 1, upon FDA clearance in the United States, is expected to be marketed and sold through an experienced medical device distribution partner network with a focus on nephrologists in hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers and private practices, to better assess patients and slow the progression of CKD.

Krillase

Through our acquisition of ACB Holding AB in 2018, we do not intendacquired the Krillase technology, a European Union researched and evaluated protease therapeutic platform that has the potential for use in the treatment of chronic wounds and burns, and other clinical applications.

Krillase, derived from Antarctic krill, shrimp-like crustaceans, is a combination of endo- and exopeptidases that safely and efficiently breaks down organic material. As a “biochemical knife,” Krillase can potentially break down organic matter, such as necrotic tissue, thrombogenic material, and biofilms produced by microorganisms. As such, it may be useful in the mitigation or treatment of multiple disease states in humans. For example, Krillase may dissolve arterial thrombogenic plaque safely and efficiently, promote faster healing, support the grafting of skin for the treatment of chronic wounds and burns, and reduce bacterial biofilms associated with poor oral health in humans and animals.

We are focused on developing a Krillase-based product pipeline to update any ofaddress several conditions across the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results. Readers are urged to carefully reviewcritical care market, including therapies for treating complex wounds and considerburns, acute ischemic stroke, deep vein thrombosis, and for dissolving plaque and biofilms on teeth.

In addition, our Krillase platform team is planning a pet health study for later in 2022. We expect the various disclosures made throughout the entiretyresults of this quarterly report, which attemptstudy will enable us to advise interested parties ofintroduce our Krillase products into the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

OVERVIEW

GBS Enterprises Incorporated, a Nevada corporation (the “Company,” “GBS,” “GBSX,” “we,” “us,” “our” or similar expressions), conducts its primary business through its 50.1% owned subsidiary, GROUP Business Software AG (“GROUP”), a German-based public-company whose stock trades on the Frankfurt Exchange under the stock symbol INW. GROUP’s software and consulting business is focused on serving IBM’s Lotus Notes and Domino market. GROUP caters primarily to mid-market and enterprise-size organizations with over 3,500 customers in thirty-eight countries spanning four continents, representing more than 5,000,000 active users of its products. GROUP’s customers include Abbot, Ernst & Young, Deutsche Bank, Bayer, HBSC, Merck and Toyota. GROUP provides IBM Lotus Notes/Domino Application and Transformation technology. Headquartered in Eisenach, Germany, GROUP has offices throughout Europe and North America. The Company maintains a website at www.gbsx.us. GROUP maintains a website at www.gbs.com. The information containedpet health market in the Company’s and GROUP’s websites is not incorporated by reference herein.

Products and Services

GBS has consolidated the fragmented Lotus Software market through the acquisition of companies with complementary product, technology or services offerings. GBS has continuously developed its software and service business to service and support GBS’s IBM Lotus customer base.

Historically, GROUP had achieved growth by acquiring companies with complimentary operations and leveraging GROUP’s expertise to turnaround and integrate these companies. Key success factors for this strategy are: enhanced portfolio, positioning GROUP as the ‘one-stop-shop’ for Lotus applications and services, expanded customer support, fast code migration, and cloud enablement/XPages conversion of acquired applications.

In 2012, in order to reduce overhead and administrative costs, we decided to restructure the Company’s multilevel subsidiary-structure. As of the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2013, we restructured or sold the following subsidiaries:

nSD Holdings, Ltd./GBS India Private Limited
nPavone AG
nGroupWare AG
nPavone, Ltd.
nebVokus, GmbH
nB.E.R.S. AD (Investment)
nIDC Global, Inc.
nGroup Live, NV.

45

SD Holdings, Ltd./GBS India Private Limited. On April 1, 2012, we sold SYN and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Synaptris and Synaptris India, to Lotus for $1,877,232. On July 1, 2012, the Company entered into a purchase agreement with SYN for $1,877,232, which transferred all SYN’s assets, including intellectual property rights, and liabilities of the IntelliPRINT and FewClix product lines, customer contracts and certain employees for operations in a new subsidiary, GBS India Private Limited, an Indian company (“GBS India”). A royalty fee in the amount of approximately $350,000 has been agreed upon for the benefit the Company. Additionally a profit based fee of up to $700,000 may be earned based on license and revenue recognized from the sold IntelliVIEW and IntelliVIEW NXT products. On August 1, 2012, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding capital stock of GBS India. We anticipate GBS India’s presence in India to accelerate our plan to expand our product development team particularly for our strategic offerings in India.

Pavone AG/Groupware AG. On July 6, 2012 and August 9, 2012, wholly-owned subsidiaries Pavone AG and Groupware AG, respectively, were merged and consolidated into one wholly-owned subsidiary, Pavone GmbH. The mergers were consummated solely for administrative purposes.

Pavone, Ltd. On July 8, 2012, Pavone, Ltd., a subsidiary of Pavone AG and a shell company, was dissolved. The Company serves the United Kingdom market through GROUP’s subsidiary GBS, Ltd.

EbVokus, GmbH. On October 1, 2012, GROUP sold all of the software and operational assets (constituting substantially all of the assets) of its wholly-owned subsidiary, ebVokus GmbH, along with the associated maintenance and project agreements to a non-affiliated third party for a purchase price of approximately $459,000, approximately $258,000 (200,000 Euros: 1 EUR = $1.29 USD on October 1, 2012) was paid at closing and the remaining $201,000 was paid on February 15, 2013 (150,000 Euro: 1EUR = $1.35 USD on February 15, 2013).

B.E.R.S. AD. On November 23, 2012, GBS AG sold its entire participation (50%) in B.E.R.S AD for a total of 25,000 BGN.

IDC Global, Inc. On February 1, 2013, GBS entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated February 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”), with IDC Global, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of GBS (“IDC”), and Global Telecom & Technology Americas, Inc., a Virginia corporation (“GTT). Pursuant to the Agreement, we sold 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of IDC to GTT for a purchase price of $4,600,000 (the “Purchase Price”), subject to certain holdback provisions, including a holdback of approximately $217,000 for accounts receivable and which is to be paid by GTT to GBS within one business day of IDC receiving such payment, $334,000 for GroupLive liabilities and liens on IDC which is to be paid by GTT to GBS within three business days that GTT is reasonably satisfied that such liabilities and liens have been removed, less any amounts up to $12,500 which GTT or IDC is required to pay to either satisfy the obligations or purchase replacement equipment; and approximately $528,000 for an outstanding dispute which is to be paid by GTT to GBS within three days that GTT is reasonably satisfied has been resolved, subject however to a term of 18 months from the closing date or, if after 18 months, the holdback will be used to offset any indemnifications by GBS under the Agreement. The Purchase Price was also subject to adjustment on a dollar-for-dollar basis for adjustments to the Net Working Capital (defined as Current Assets minus Current Liabilities) of IDC by GTT.

Group Live N.V. operating under the laws of the Netherlands and a 100% subsidiary of GROUP declared its end of business May 31, 2012, registered in the commercial register June 22, 2012. Following the local procedures the Company has been dissolved from the register as per April 5, 2013, registered April 16, 2013.

The Board of Directors of the Company has approved each of the transactions discussed above.

Messaging and Business Applications Software & Solutions

GBS Messaging and Business Application Software & Solutions product lines include software and advisory services for email and Instant Messaging (IM) Management, Security, Compliance, Archiving and Productivity, CRM Applications, Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC) Management software, Workflow and Business Process Management software, ePDF Archiving & Document Management.

GBS develops, sells and installs well-known business process and management software suites based on Lotus Notes / Domino and IBM Portal technology, mainly for major international companies and medium-sized customers.

Through GBS’s comprehensive messaging software product lines and associated services, Lotus Notes, Microsoft Exchange or SMTP-based-email customers, as well as Lotus Sametime, customers are able to provide their users with a secure, efficient and centrally administered use of e-mail and IM while maintaining control over their compliance with current legal requirements and corporate guidelines.

Consulting Services

GBS develops, sells and orchestrates customer-specific Lotus Domino strategy and consulting services, such as CIO and IT department leader Strategic Advisory Services, Managed Services, Outsourcing, Administration, Assessments and Implementations, Performance Improvements, Custom Application Development, Governance and Security, Technical Support, and Training, as well as Email Migration Services.

Based on GBS’s unique concentration of industry talent and expertise, mainly in the areas inside and around IBM Lotus Notes/Domino, inside and around corporate messaging (IBM, Microsoft, SMTP) and inside and around IT environmental and application assessment, analysis and reporting, commercial and governmental customers, as well as Software Integrators (SI) and channel partners, are able to rely on the company’s strategic and tactical advisory services for evaluating, planning, staffing and execution of related customer projects. GBS Consulting Services’ global teams of consultants use modern project management techniques, proprietary methodologies and GBS accelerator technologies to complete client projects on time and with reduced risk.

States. We believe that our focus on recruiting and retaining top Lotus expertise positions our team to offer leading-edge Lotus Notes / Domino subject matter knowledge to our customers.

Asthe U.S. pet health market presents a Premier IBM Business Partner, GBS is one of the few partners that can sell and support licenses for all five IBM software brands: Lotus, WebSphere, Rational, Tivoli, and DB2.

Market Trends

As IT departments face continuous budget reductions and constant pressure for higher performance and efficiency, CIOs are focusing on modern technologies to support their need for increased scalability, flexibility and lower costs. GBS has identified this demand as a strategic growthsubstantial opportunity for the company and has placed a significant focus on expanding its Modernizing/Migrating technology, which will assist client companies as they movemarketing of our Krillase products. We expect to scale and adapt while remaining cost conscious.

GBS Lotus Application Modernization and Migration

GBS Lotus Application Modernization and Migration activities are focused onestablish the IBM Lotus / Domino applications market and the offering spans from expert services and accelerator technologies to modernized, web enabled (also named “cloud” or “cloud computing”) and migrated Lotus applications; and thus ultimately to take the Lotus applications from legacy to the future. The foundationfirst stream of the Modernizing/Migrating Suite Software offering is GBS’s significant R&D investment in a set of methodologies and key technology accelerators to automate the conversion of traditional Notes based client-server applications, into the IBM XPages framework which enables Domino applications to be run and accessed via the Lotus client, a web browser or on a mobile device. The patent-pended software that underpins Modernizing/Migrating was developed by GBS with assistance and guidance from IBM’s Software Group to ensure alignment with future releases of the IBM Lotus / Domino and XPages technology.

Revenue Model

GBS generates its revenue from the sale of internally created software, third-party developed softwareKrillase-based pet health products in 2023.

Our strategic plan for Krillase is to first, leverage and maximize near-term revenue generating opportunities with Krillase products for commercial or clinical applications with low regulatory risk, such as in the delivery of related services, including IT systems planning, administration, support, hosting, implementationpet health market, and integration.

Strategy and Focus Areas

Based on current market demandssecond, develop products for modern, Cloud-based and mobile-device capable business applications we have acquired and developed a set of unique technologies that help organizations reduce the time, cost, resources and risks associated with modernizing or migrating their existing applications.

We generate revenue from subscription and usage fees and related services, including support and strategic consulting services. The subscription period is typically based on a yearly or multi-year contract with our customers. Another sector of our strategic portfolio is a suite of tools and methodologies we have developed to rapidly convert Lotus Notes applications into web and modern mobile applications. This portfolio includes a set of powerful analysis tools known as Insights that identify all of the Lotus NotesKrillase platform that address unmet medical needs or address medical market needs better than existing products in the marketplace, in clinical applications within an organization and provide metrics aboutwith higher regulatory risk but significant commercial potential.

Our Competitive Strengths

We believe that the uses and users of those applications. Becausefollowing competitive strengths will enable us to compete effectively:

Superior, first-in-class vascular surgery graft solution. Management believes that the DuraGraft platform provides a significant and substantial competitive advantage. Having received CE marking in Europe, DuraGraft is a “first-in-class” product, certified for sale in Europe for vein graft preservation.
Early detection at point-of-care. Through our MATLOC platform, we plan to provide the ability to quantitatively screen and diagnose for CKD at point-of-care. The lab-on-chip technology’s low limit of detection and sensitivity enable earlier screening and diagnosis of CKD while the point-of-care capabilities of the MATLOC device(s) allow for testing outside of a lab setting.
Superior wound-healing method. Our Krillase platform provides a significant and substantial competitive advantage as clinical studies in Europe have shown Krillase to achieve superior wound-healing effects in treatment of necrotic leg ulcers.

Our Growth Strategies

We will strive to grow our business by pursuing the following key growth strategies:

Commercialize DuraGraft and related products.
Commercialize MATLOC 1 and related products.
Commercialize Krillase and related products.
Acquire more life science assets.

The strategic plans described above will require capital. We expect to raise a substantial portion of the nature of Lotus Notes and Domino, the applications within a customer environment tend to be highly distributed and numberrequired capital in the thousands. For many organizations, this fact alone makes it extremely difficult to plan for projects that involve modernizing these applications for use in a browser and on mobile devices or migrating them to another platform. Our technologies help them to dramatically reduce the cost, risk, time and resources associated with these highly complex projects.

We generate revenue with our analysis tools by charging a fee for the use of our technology and for the associated cost of the services to produce a report and set of recommendations for the customer. Additional revenues come from consulting services that result from helping our customers implement those recommendations. For use of our conversion tools, referred to as Modernizing/Migrating, we charge a flat fee for the conversion and additional hourly rates to perform additional supporting development or testing as needed. We also believe there is a significant revenue opportunity in licensing these tools to a network of global partners who also have existing presence and expertise in the Lotus Notes and Domino market. We have established partner agreements for the use of the analysis and conversion tools with partners in several countries and directly with IBM.

General Corporate History

The Company was originally incorporated in the state of Nevada on March 20, 2007 as SWAV Enterprises Ltd. (“SWAV”). SWAV was in a different industry and had a different management team and Board of Directors.

On April 26, 2010, SWAV purchased certain technology assets of Lotus Holdings Ltd. (“Lotus”) in consideration for 2,265,240 shares of SWAV common stock. Also on April 26, 2010, Lotus (on behalf of the SPPEF Members as discussed below) purchased an aggregate of 11,984,770 of the outstanding shares of SWAV common stock from certain selling shareholders of SWAV for an aggregate purchase price of $370,000. As a result of these two sets of transactions, Lotus acquired an aggregate of 14,250,010 shares of SWAV common stock which constituted approximately 95.0% of the 15,000,000 outstanding shares of SWAV common stock on April 26, 2010.

Upon the consummation of the April 26, 2010 acquisition, the then executive officers and directors of SWAV resigned and Mr. Joerg Ott, the Chief Executive Officer of GROUP and a GROUP Major Shareholder, was appointed the Chief Executive Officer of SWAV and sole member of SWAV’s Board of Directors. Mr. Ott currently serves as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of GBSX and the Chief Executive Officer of GROUP.

On September 6, 2010, SWAV’s name was changed to GBS Enterprises Incorporated. On October 14, 2010, the Company’s trading symbol on the OTC Bulletin Board was changed from SWAV to GBSX. The Company’s common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Market OTCQB under the ticker symbol GBSX.

About Lotus Holdings, Ltd.

Lotus is a holding company which was formed under the laws of Gibraltar for the purpose of financing merger and acquisition projects, specifically in the niche market of small or microcap companies listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange with complex shareholder structures and whose stock is trading below one Euro (€1.00) per share.

SPPEFs

Lotus typically finances its merger and acquisition projects through the use of Special Purpose Private Equity Funds (“SPPEFs”). Typically, SPPEFs are funded by a company’s major shareholders (the “Major Shareholders”) seeking to raise capital for projects and who fund at least 50% of the SPPEF, with the remaining portion being provided through the investment community and network of investors in Lotus. Each SPPEF is co-managed by a representative of the Major Shareholders (the “Representative Secretary”) and an attorney appointed by Lotus (the “Lotus Representative”).

On February 25, 2010, a group of shareholders (the “GROUP Major Shareholders”) of GROUP Software AG, a German public company trading on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol “INW” (“GROUP”), engaged Lotus to provide financial consulting and advisory services, on a non-exclusive basis, for the primary task of establishing a SPPEF. On March 12, 2010, the GROUP Major Shareholders and Lotus established and funded a SPPEF with $1,400,000, consisting of $1,000,000 from the GROUP Major Shareholders and $400,000 from a Lotus investor (collectively, the “SPPEF Members”).

In early April 2010, the SPPEF Members decided to acquire SWAV. As disclosed above, on April 26, 2010, Lotus, on behalf of the SPPEF Members, acquired an aggregate of 11,984,770 shares of SWAV common stock from the selling shareholders of SWAV for an aggregate purchase price of $370,000. The 11,984,770 shares of SWAV common stock shares represented approximately 79.9% of the 15,000,000 outstanding shares of SWAV common stock on April 26, 2010.

Transactions following the April 26, 2010 Transaction

On November 1, 2010, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 3,043,985 of the 11,984,770 shares of the Company’s common stock originally purchased by Lotus on April 26, 2010. In consideration for these 3,043,985 shares, the Company issued to Lotus a Secured Demand Note, dated November 1, 2010 (the “First Demand Note”), for the principal amount of $300,000, bearing interest at the rate of 5% per annum. The First Demand Note was repaid in September 2011.

Effective December 30, 2010, pursuant to securities purchase agreements between the Company and six GROUP Major Shareholders, the Company purchased an aggregate of 7,115,500 shares of GROUP common stock from the six GROUP Major Shareholders in consideration for the 3,043,985 shares of GBS common stock (the “December 2010 Transaction”). As a result, the Company owned approximately 28.2% of the outstanding common stock of GROUP.

Reverse Merger

After the December 2010 Transaction was completed, the additional GROUP Major Shareholders decided to accept the share swap offer from the Company and to effectuate a reverse merger of GROUP and the Company. To effectuate the reverse merger, on January 5, 2011, the Company repurchased from Lotus an aggregate of 2,361,426 of the 11,984,770 shares of the Company’s common stock originally purchased by Lotus on April 26, 2010. In consideration for these 2,361,426 shares, the Company issued to Lotus a Secured Demand Note, dated January 5, 2011 (the “Second Demand Note”), for the principal amount of $200,000, bearing interest at the rate of 5% per annum. The Second Demand Note was repaid in November 2011.

Effective January 6, 2011, pursuant to securities purchase agreements between the Company and the remaining GROUP Major Shareholders, the Company purchased an aggregate of 5,525,735 shares of GROUP common stock from the remaining GROUP Major Shareholders in consideration for the 2,361,426 shares of GBS common stock (the “January 2011 Transaction”). These 5,525,735 GROUP shares represented approximately 21.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock of GROUP. As a result of the December 2010 Transaction and January 2011 Transaction, the Company had acquired an aggregate of 12,641,235 shares of GROUP common stock from the GROUP Major Shareholders in consideration for an aggregate of 5,405,411 shares of GBS common stock, resulting in GBS owning approximately 50.1% of the outstanding GROUP common stock and effectuating a reverse merger of the Company and GROUP whereby GROUP became the accounting acquirer.

Additional GROUP Acquisition

On February 27, 2012, we acquired an additional 883,765 shares of GROUP common stock for $619,000 in order to maintain our 50.1% majority ownership of GROUP due to an increase in the outstanding common stock of GROUP.

Executive Offices

Our principal executive office is located at 585 Molly Lane, Woodstock, Georgia 30189 and our telephone number is (404) 891-1711. GROUP’s executive offices are located at Hospitalstrasse 6, 99817 Eisenach, Germany. We maintain a website at www.gbsx.us. GROUP maintains a website at www.gbs.com. The information contained in the Company’s and GROUP’s websites is not incorporated by reference herein.

Changes in Financial Condition

Assets:

Total Assets decreased from $56,802,492 at December 31, 2012 to $47,279,675 at September 30, 2013.  Total Assets consists of Total Current Assets and Total Non-Current Assets.

Total Current Assets

At September 30, 2013, Total Current Assets were $4,294,224 as compared to $6,444,192 at December 31, 2012. Total Current Assets consist of: Cash and Cash Equivalents, Accounts Receivable, Inventory, Prepaid Expenses, and Other Receivables-current.

nCash and Cash Equivalents decreased from $1,154,602 at December 31, 2012 to $259,614 at September 30, 2013 as a result of our investments in strategic technology areas such as application migration and modernization and the associated costs necessary to build and implement the go- to- market strategy and losses in operations.

nAccounts Receivable decreased from $4,143,448 at December 31, 2012 to $3,528,260 at September 30, 2013 due to increased collections during the reporting period and less revenue.

nInventory increased from $nil at December 31, 2012 to $21,684 at September 30, 2013.

nPrepaid Expenses increased from $84,304 at December 31, 2012 to $207,811 at September 30, 2013 from prepaid rent, insurance and advances on technological events.

nOther Receivables-current decreased from $676,976 at December 31, 2012 to $276,856 at September 30, 2013.

Total Non-Current Assets

At September 30, 2013, Total Non-Current Assets were $42,985,450 as compared to $50,358,300 at December 31, 2012.  Total Non-Current Assets consist of: Property Plant and Equipment, Other Receivables non-current, Deferred Tax Assets non-current, Goodwill, Software, and Other Assets.

nNet Property (plant and equipment) decreased from $332,839 at December 31, 2012 to $282,601 at September 30, 2013.

nOther Receivables non-current decreased from $428,422 at December 31, 2012 to $1,217 at September 30, 2013 and consisted of cooperative shares.

nDeferred Tax Assets non-current decreased from $1,132,103 at December 31, 2012 to $1,076,010 at September 30, 2013 and consisted of Deferred Tax Assets derived from financial assets and losses carried forward.

nGoodwill decreased from $34,254,881 at December 31, 2012 to $31,260,500 at September 30, 2013. The decrease in goodwill of $2,994,381 resulted from the sale of the subsidiary IDC Global, Inc. on February 1, 2013.

nSoftware decreased from $12,207,031 at December 31, 2012 to $10,232,633 at September 30, 2013, as a result of the quarterly re-calculation of capitalized development costs, product rights and license for our expert business software, legacy business software and strategic business software all in the developmental or improvement stage. The decrease is also related to an overall cost reduction program, resulting in less contribution of capitalized software development.

nOther Assets decreased from $156,379 at December 31, 2012 to $132,489 at September 30, 2013. This category includes rent and other security deposits.

Liabilities

Total Liabilities decreased from $22,269,060 at December 31, 2012 to $16,870,431 at September 30, 2013.  Total Liabilities consists of Total Current Liabilities and Total Non-Current Liabilities.

Total Current Liabilities

At September 30, 2013, Total Current Liabilities were $16,698,017, compared to $18,227,184 at December 31, 2012.  Total Current Liabilities consist of Notes Payable, Liabilities to Banks, Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities, Deferred Income, and Other Liabilities.

nNotes Payable decreased from $2,313,572 at December 31, 2012 to $1,775,010 at September 30, 2013 based on repayments of short terms loans during the quarter.

nLiabilities to Banks increased from $6,774 at December 31, 2012 to $3,887,764 at September 30, 2013 and included a line of credit and cash in transit. The increase was mainly as a result from reclassification from non-current liabilities to current liabilities.
nAccounts Payable and Accrued Liabilitiesdecreased from $6,241,733 at December 31, 2012 to $3,946,070 at September 30, 2013. The decrease was due to the reduction of trade payables by approximately $1,034,000 and a decrease in accrued liabilities of approximately $1,262,000 by repayment and as a result of the sale of subsidiary IDC Global. The remaining amounts were reclassified into other short term notes and due to related parties.

nDeferred Income increased from $6,099,570 at December 31, 2012 to $6,846,920 at September 30, 2013, and consists mainly of maintenance income collected in advance of the contractual maintenance period.
nOther Liabilities of $860,032 at December 31, 2012 decreased to $242,352 at September 30, 2013 and includes miscellaneous short term obligations including current amounts due on business assets.

Total Non-Current Liabilities

At September 30, 2013, our Total Non-Current Liabilities were $172,414 compared to $4,041,876 at December 31, 2012.  Total Non-Current Liabilities consist of Liabilities to Banks, Retirement Benefit Obligation, Liabilities Held for Sale, and Deferred Tax Liabilities non-current.

nLiabilities to Banks decreased from $3,716,102 at December 31, 2012 to $Nil at September 30, 2013 as a result from reclassification from non-current liabilities to current liabilities.

nRetirement Benefit Obligation increased from $165,876 at December 31, 2012 to $172,414 at September 30, 2013.
nLiabilities Held for Sale decreased from $159,898 at December 31, 2012 to $Nil at September 30, 2013 as a result of the sale of IDC Global, Inc. on February 1, 2013.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012

Revenues

For the three months ended September 30, 2013, our total revenue decreased to $5,065,656 from $ 5,709,778 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, a decline of $644,122 or 11%. The Company generates revenue from two divisions. The Product division of Revenues includes revenue generated from the sale of Licenses, Maintenance, Third-Party Products, and Other revenues. The Service division includes revenue generated from services rendered.

The Product division decreased to $4,133,565 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 from $4,719,446 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of $585,881 or 12%. The primary contributing factors were decreases in License revenues of approximately $655,000, Third Party Product revenues of $350,000, increases in Maintenance revenues of approximately $490,000 and decreases in Other revenues of approximately $65,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012. This is mainly as a result of economic conditions causing an increase in the sales cycles, whereby strategic customers are giving greater consideration towards the modernization/migration of their current application platform.

The Service division of revenue decreased $56,634 or 6% from $990,333 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 to $932,091 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, primarily as a result of the sale of subsidiary companies that were contributors to the Service division of revenue.

Cost of Goods Sold

For the three months ended September 30, 2013, total Cost of Goods Sold decreased to $2,273,055 from $3,212,767 for the three months ended September 30, 2012, a cost reduction of $_939,712 or 29%.

The Company’s Cost of Goods Sold is segmented into two divisions. The first are costs related to the Product division of revenue which includes the total cost of materials. The second are the costs related to the Service division of revenue which includes; other operating expenses, depreciation & amortization expense, and personnel expenses.

Within the Costs of Goods Sold related to the Product division, the Company saw a $358,890 or 39% decrease from $ 922,839 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 to $_563,950 for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The primary factors contributing to the Company’s lower Costs of Goods Sold related to the Product division of revenues was a reduction of $282,639 in product material costs and of $76,250 in third party product material costs for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Within the Costs of Goods Sold related to the Service division, the Company had a reduction of $580,822 or 25%, in the total costs of services from $ 2,289,927 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 to $ 1,709,105 for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The primary factor contributing to the Company’s reduction in the costs of services was a decrease in the volume of services rendered and a reduction in personnel costs, depreciation and amortization costs associated with the sale of subsidiary companies. Additional personnel costs relating to Services are included in Selling Expenses and these were also reduced from the quarter ending September 30, 2012 as indicated below.

Operating Expenses

The Company’s total operating expense consists of three segments; selling, administrative and general expenses. For the three months ended September 30, 2013, total operating expenses decreased $878,493 or 21% to $3,294,910 from $4,173,403 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. 

For the three months ended September 30, 2013, Selling Expenses decreased $592,531 or 23% to $ 2,033,242 from $2,625,773 for the three months ended September 30, 2012.  This was primarily due to decreases in cost of materials of $13,269, personnel expense of $532,914 and in other selling expense of $81,705, coupled with a reduction in other operating income of $9,522 and a slight increase in depreciation expense of $480.

For the three months ended September 30, 2013, Administrative Expense decreased by $83,977 or 7% to $1,145,304 from $1,229,281 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. This was primarily due to a reduction in personnel costs of $55,535 coupled with an increase in other operating income of $1,116 and decreases in other administrative expense of $ 142,207 and depreciation expense of $3,812.

51

For the three months ended September 30, 2013, General Expense decreased $197,986 to $120,364 from $318,350 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. This was primarily due decreases of $50,011 in other operating income and in personnel expense of $16,282, and other operating expense of $231,541. Depreciation of approximately $22,000 was at the same level as for the three months ended September 2012.

Other Income (Expense)

For the three months ended September 30, 2013, net Other Expenses of $95,487 increased from net Other Income of $759,169for the three months ended September 30, 2012. This change is primarily due to a decrease in Other Income of $847,976 and an increase in net Interest Expense of $6,472 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012

Revenues

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, our total revenue decreased $3,151,581 or 16.8% to $15,613,048 from $ 18,764,628 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The Company generates revenue from two divisions. The Product division of Revenues includes revenue generated from the sale of Licenses, Maintenance, Third-Party Products, and Other revenues. The Service division includes revenue generated from services rendered.

The Product division decreased $2,077,770 or 14% to $13,170,113 from $15,247,833 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 The primary factors contributing to the decline were decreases in License revenues of $954,414, Maintenance revenues of $116,808, Third Party Product revenues of $897,551 and Other revenues of $ 108,998 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012. This is mainly as a result of economic conditions causing an increase in the sales cycles, whereby strategic customers are giving greater consideration towards the modernization/migration of their current application platform.

The Service division of revenue decreased $1,073,810 or 31%, from $3,516,745 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 to $ 2,442,935 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily as a result of a reduction in service staff.

Cost of Goods Sold

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, total Cost of Goods Sold decreased $ 2,760,159 or 26% to $ 7,690,366 from $ 10,450,525 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

The Company’s Cost of Goods Sold is segmented into two divisions. The first are costs related to the Product division of revenue which includes the total cost of materials. The second are the costs related to the Service division of revenue which includes; other operating expenses, depreciation & amortization expense, and personnel expenses.

Within the Costs of Goods Sold related to the Product division the Company shows a $1,095,001 or 29% reduction from $3,833,550 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 to $2,738,549 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The primary factors contributing to the Company’s lower Costs of Goods Sold related to the Product division of revenues was a reduction of $863,080 in product material costs and a reduction of $231,921 in third party product material costs, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Within the Costs of Goods Sold related to the Service division, the Company had a reduction of $_1,665,158 or 25% in the total costs of services from $6,616,975 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 to $4,951,817 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The primary factor contributing to the Company’s reduction in the costs of services was a decrease in the volume of services rendered and a reduction in personnel costs, depreciation and amortization costs associated with the cost reduction program.

Operating Expenses

The Company’s total operating expense consist of three segments; selling, administrative and general expenses. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, total operating expenses decreased $ 3,703,409 or 25 % to $ 10,938,080 from $14,641,489 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. 

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, Selling Expenses decreased $3,362,859 or 34 % to $ 6,627,311 from $ 9,990,170 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.  This was primarily due to decreases in cost of materials of $ 234,736, personnel expense of $ 2,510,500 and in other selling expense of $ 663,892, coupled with a reduction in other operating income of $ 41,904 and a slight increase in depreciation expense of $ 4,365.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, Administrative Expense decreased by $ 17,652 or .45% to $3,922,440 from $3,940,092 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. This was primarily due to an increase in other operating income of $ 76,593, an increase in personnel expenses of $ 211,539, increase in depreciation expense of $ 16,270 offset by a decrease in other operating expenses of $ 168,868

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, General Expense decreased by $318,898 or 45 % to $392,329 from $711,227 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. This was primarily due to a decrease in other operating costs of $ 211,603 and a decrease in personnel expenses of $ 67,508, an increase in other operating income of $ 159,480 with an increase in depreciation expense of $ 119,649

Other Income (Expense)

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, net Other Income of $20,517 increased from net Other Expense of $185,996 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. This change is primarily due to an increase in Other Income of $513,887 and a net increase in Interest Expense of $307,374 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Liquidity & Capital Resources

As September 30, 2013, the Company had $ 259,614 in cash and cash equivalents, compared to $1,154,602 at December 31, 2012.

The Company's cash flow depends on the timely and successful market entry of its strategic offerings. The dependency accounts for revenue generated from direct customers engagements, as well as for revenue generated through the partner channel network.

Especially for strategic offerings for paradigm shifting technologies, management's budget plan is based on a series of assumptions regarding market acceptance, readiness and pricing. While management's assumptions are based on market research and customer surveys, assumptions bear the risk of being incorrect and may result in a delay in customer projects and consequently a delay or a reduction in related invoicing. In case these delays have an impact on the Company's liquidity and therefore its ability to support its operations with the necessary cash flow, the Company depends on its ability to generate cash flow from other resources, such as debt financing from related or independent resources or as equity financing from existing shareholders or through the stock market.

Since 2012, the Company has been exploring internal and external sources for financing. To date, these sources have provided necessary funds to support the working capital needs of the Company; mainly to finance the Company’s strategicplanned future offerings. There can be no assurances, however, that the Companywe will be able to obtain additional funds from these or any other sourcesraise the capital that we need to execute our plans or that such fundscapital, whether through securities offerings, either private or public, will be available to us on acceptable terms, if at all. An inability to raise sufficient funds could cause us to permitscale back our development and growth plans or discontinue them altogether.

20

KEY HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2022

Financing

In 2021, the Company offered up to implement4,000,000 units (the “Units Offering”), comprised of convertible notes and warrants, with the intent to raise up to $10,000,000 on a rolling basis. In late 2021, due to the Company’s continuous growth and need for additional capital to sustain its intended business strategy. In the eventoperations and progress towards its goals, the Company is not able to secure additional funds, management will postpone any strategic investment until the financing will be sufficient. However, management believes as a resultamended certain terms and conditions of the assets purchased and sold to date, in accordance withUnits Offering. As the above-mentioned statement, the Company will be able to provide sufficient cash flow to support its standard operations for the next 9 months.result:

From time to time, the Company has issued promissory notes to fund its operations. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had an aggregate of $nil.

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2013, we raised capital by consummating the following transactions:

nOn February 1, 2013, we sold 100% of our ownership in IDC Global, Inc. for net proceeds of $3,577,195.

nOn February 12, 2013, we issued an aggregate of 500,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to Board Member Stephen Baksa, pursuant to exercise of a common stock purchase warrant issued on October 26, 2012 and exercisable for $0.20 per share, for total proceeds of $100,000.

nOn February 12, 2013,In 2021 the Company issued an aggregate of 250,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to an Accredited Investor (as that term is defined the Securities Act) pursuant to exercise of a common stock purchase warrant issued on November 30, 2012 and exercisable4,260,594 units for $0.20 per share, for totalgross proceeds of $50,000.$7,397,445.

nOn April 26, 2013,During the Company entered into a note purchase and security agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Stephen D. Baksa (the “Lender’), a memberfirst half of the Board. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement,2022, the Company issued a secured promissory note, dated April 26, 2013 (the “Note”), to Mr. Baksaadditional 3,322,929 units for the principal amountgross proceeds of $200,000, bearing interest at a rate of 2% per month and maturing on June 30, 2013 or such other time as described in more detail in the Note, without any penalty for prepayment. This Note is secured by fifty percent (50%) of certain financial holdbacks$5,815,138.
Subsequent to the Company pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated February 1, 2013, by and amongQ2 2022 end, on August 12, 2022, the Company IDC Global, Inc. and Global Telecom & Technology Americas, Inc.
§In connection withconducted the executionfinal closing of the Loan Agreement, on April 29, 2013,Unit Offering and issued 857,142 units for the Company issued the Lender a common stock purchase warrant (the “Warrant”), pursuant to which the Lender is entitled to purchase 100,000 sharesgross proceeds of common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 from May 1, 2013 until April 30, 2016. The Warrant was issued in a private transaction between the Company and the Lender and was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) thereof.$1,500,000.

In aggregate, the Company received $14,712,583 in proceeds from the Unit Purchase Agreement. The proceeds from the Units Offering were used to settle certain debt obligations and will be used to sustain the Company’s growth and meet its capital obligations.

Reverse Stock Split

Subsequent to the Q2 2022 end, on August 1, 2022, the Board of Directors of Marizyme approved a reverse stock split of the Company’s common stock at a ratio of 1-for-4 in connection with a proposed Nasdaq listing. The Reverse Stock Split will become effective after the FINRA approval and the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC approval of the Company’s listing application.

On the Effective Date, the total number of shares of common stock held by each stockholder will be converted automatically into the number of whole shares of Common Stock equal to the number of issued and outstanding shares of common stock held by such stockholder immediately prior to the Reverse Stock Split, divided by four. No fractional shares will be issued, and no cash or other consideration will be paid. Instead, the Company will issue one whole share of the post-Reverse Stock Split Common Stock to any stockholder who otherwise would have received a fractional share as a result of the Reverse Stock Split.

Operational

In 2021 Marizyme had undergone a corporate restructuring, whereby the key officers, directors, and management team changed in order to accelerate Company’s progress toward meeting its key objectives and deliver on its strategy. In the first half of 2022, the executive and management team has been focused on meeting and delivering on the Company’s objectives to commercialize its products and advance in its search for more life science assets. Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2022, the Board of Directors of the Company was increased from five to seven members and a new Chair of the Audit Committee was elected.

FINANCIAL OPERATIONS REVIEW

Component of Results of Operations

Revenue

Revenue represents gross product sales less service fees and product returns. For our Distribution Partner channel, we recognize revenue for product sales at the time of delivery of the product to our Distribution Partner. As our products have an expiration date, if a product expires, we will replace the product at no charge. Currently, all of our revenue is generated from the sale of DuraGraft in European and Asian markets where the product has the required regulatory approvals.

Direct Cost of Revenue

Direct costs of revenue include primarily product costs, which include all costs directly related to the purchase of raw materials, charges from our contract manufacturing organizations, and manufacturing overhead costs, as well as shipping and distribution charges. Direct costs of revenue also include losses from excess, slow-moving or obsolete inventory and inventory purchase commitments, if any.

Professional Fees

Professional fees include legal fees relating to intellectual property development, due diligence and corporate matters, and consulting fees for accounting, finance, and valuation services. Professional fees paid to a related party relate to certain consulting services. See Note 9 to the financial statements accompanying this report for further related disclosures. We anticipate increased expenses related to audit, legal, regulatory, and tax-related services associated with maintaining compliance with exchange listing and SEC requirements.

Salaries and Stock-Based Compensation

Salaries consists of compensation and related personnel costs. Stock-based compensation represents the fair value of equity-settled share awards on stock options and restricted share awards granted by the Company to its employees, officers, directors, and consultants. The fair value of awards is calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which considers the following factors: exercise price, current market price of the underlying shares, expected life, risk-free interest rate, expected volatility, dividend yield, and forfeiture rate.

Research and Development

All research and development costs are expensed in the period incurred and consist primarily of salaries, payroll taxes, and employee benefits for individuals involved in research and development efforts, external research and development costs incurred under agreements with contract research organizations and consultants to conduct and support the Company’s ongoing clinical trials of Duragraft, and costs related to manufacturing Duragraft for clinical trials. The Company has entered into various research and development contracts with various organizations and other companies.

§In connection with the execution of the Loan Agreement, on April 29, 2013, the Company issued the Lender a conditional common stock purchase warrant (the “Conditional Warrant”) which is exercisable in the event that Note is not paid in full by June 30, 2013, pursuant to which the Lender is entitled to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 from July 1, 2013 until June 30, 2016 as described more fully in the Note. The Conditional Warrant was issued in a private transaction between the Company and the Lender and was exempt from registration under the Securities Act, pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) thereof.21

 

§The Company aggressively re-negotiated the terms of the Loan Agreement with the Lender and has swapped the outstanding loan against receivables.

nOn April 26, 2013, the Company entered into a note purchase and security agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with Vitamin B Venture GmbH (the “Lender”), an entity of which Joerg Ott, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, has voting and dispositive control. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the Company issued to the Lender a secured promissory note, dated October 26, 2012 (the “Note”), for the principal amount of $200,000, bearing interest at a rate of 2% per month and maturing on June 30, 2013 or such other time as described in more detail in the Note, without any penalty for prepayment. This Note is secured by fifty percent (50%) of certain financial holdbacks to be paid to the Company pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated February 1, 2013, by and among the Company, IDC Global, Inc. and Global Telecom & Technology Americas, Inc.

§In connection with the execution of the Loan Agreement, on April 29, 2013, the Company issued the Lender a common stock purchase warrant (the “Warrant”), pursuant to which the Lender is entitled to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 from May 1, 2013 until April 30, 2016. The Warrant was issued in a private transaction between the Company and the Lender and was exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) thereof.

§In connection with the execution of the Loan Agreement, on April 29, 2013, the Company issued the Lender a conditional common stock purchase warrant (the “Conditional Warrant”) which is exercisable in the event that Note is not paid in full by June 30, 2013, pursuant to which the Lender is entitled to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 from July 1, 2013 until June 30, 2016 as described more fully in the Note. The Conditional Warrant was issued in a private transaction between the Company and the Lender and was exempt from registration under the Securities Act, pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) thereof.

§The Company aggressively re-negotiated the terms of the Loan Agreement with the Lender and has swapped the outstanding loan against receivables.

nOn August  6, 2013the Company issued 25,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to a third party non-affiliated consultant in consideration for consulting services rendered by the consultant to the Company. The Company issued the securities in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) (formerly Section 4(2)) of the Securities Act due to the fact that the issuance was isolated and did not involve a public offering of securities.

Other General and Administrative Expenses

Subsequent Events:

Other general and administrative expenses consist principally of marketing and selling expenses, facility costs, administrative and office expenses, director and officer insurance premiums, and investor relations costs associated with operating a public company.

Other Income (Expenses)

Other income (expenses) consists of mark-to-market adjustments on contingent liabilities assumed on the acquisition of Somah assets and interest and accretion expenses related to our convertible notes issued pursuant to the Unit Purchase Agreement.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2022 and 2021

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021:

  Three Months Ended June 30,  
  2022 2021 Change
       
Revenue $61,809  $160,785  $(98,976)
             
Operating expenses:            
Direct costs of revenue  11,025   119,221   (108,196)
Professional fees (includes related party amounts of $163,200 and $90,000, respectively)  873,865   455,552   418,313 
Salary expenses  902,106   683,197   218,909 
Research and development  1,371,470   244,686   1,126,784 
Stock-based compensation  676,242   194,657   481,585 
Depreciation and amortization  210,361   26,715   183,646 
Other general and administrative expenses  618,498   349,496   269,002 
Total operating expenses  4,663,567   2,073,524   2,590,043 
Total operating loss $(4,601,758) $(1,912,739) $(2,689,019)
Other income (expenses):            
Interest and accretion expense  (530,226)  (4,189)  (526,037)
Change in fair value of contingent liabilities  (1,792,000)  278,000   (2,070,000)
Net loss $(6,923,984) $(1,638,928) $(5,285,056)

Revenue

We recognized revenue of $0.06 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022 compared to $0.16 million for the three months ended June 30, 2021. The decrease in revenues was due to COVID-19 impact on the Company’s supply chain in the fiscal 2021 and its ability to produce Duragraft inventory. No revenue from Duragraft sales was generated in Q1 2022, but as anticipated, as the result of the executive and management teams efforts to re-establish the Company’s business relationships with its trusted manufacturing and distribution partners, the production of Duragraft inventory and sales resumed in Q2 2022.

Direct Costs of Revenue

 

On August 13, 2012,Direct costs of revenue decreased by $0.11 million or 91% to $0.01 million for the second quarter of 2022 compared to $0.12 for the second quarter of 2021. This was predominantly due to fewer units of product produced in the current period because of the shortage of the raw materials as a result of COVID-19.

Professional Fees

Professional fees increased by $0.42 million or 92% to $0.87 million in Q2 2022 compared to $0.46 million in Q2 2021. The increase was mainly due to the compensation extended to Univest Securities, LLC for their services rendered in relation to the Unit Purchase Agreement financing. Related party professional fees increased by $0.07 million or 81% to $0.16 million from $0.09 million during the second quarter of 2022 compared to the second quarter of 2021 – the Company entered intoretained additional consulting services in order to advance development of its three medical technology platforms - DuraGraft, MATLOC and Krillase.

Salary Expenses

Salary expenses in Q2 2022, were $0.90 million, a note purchase$0.22 million or 32% increase from the comparative period. The increase in the cost is attributable to the restructuring and security agreement (the “Loan Agreement”) with John A. Moore, a membergrowth of the Board. Pursuantorganization as the Company restructured its executive and management teams in the late 2021 and continues to expand into the new markets and working towards commercialization of the DuraGraft in the United States.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses in Q2 2022, were $1.37 million, a $1.13 million or 461% increase from the comparative period. The increase in the research and development expenses can be mainly attributed to the LoanCompany’s acquisition of MATLOC 1 product in late 2021 and its focus on development and advancement of all its products – DuraGraft, Krillase, and MATLOC 1 towards commercialization.

Stock-Based Compensation

The increase in the stock-based compensation can be explained by additional 400,000 stock options granted in 2022 and 350,000 restricted share awards granted in late 2021, fair value of which have increased significantly from the stock options granted and outstanding in the comparative period due to the increased stock price period over period.

22

Other General and Administrative Expenses

Other general and administrative expenses increased $0.27 million or 77% to $0.62 million in Q2 2022. The increase was due to the Company’s non-legal fees related to the filing of S-1 form in the period, preparation toward the public offering, increased rent due to the lease of additional office and laboratory space, and expenses associated with running a public company. Due to the planned continued buildout of administrative and commercial functions we expect general and administrative expenses to increase in future periods.

Other Income (Expenses)

In Q2 2022, the Company incurred $0.53 million of interest and accretion costs associated with convertible notes issued at discount as part of the Units Offering Agreements. Additionally, the Company recognized $1.79 million of fair value loss from mark-to-market adjustments on the contingent liabilities assumed on the acquisition of Somah due to the change of the fair value of the contingent consideration.

Comparison of the Six Months Ended June 30, 2022 and 2021

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021:

  Six Months Ended June 30,  
  2022 2021 Change
       
Revenue $61,809  $234,737  $(172,928)
             
Operating expenses:            
Direct costs of revenue  11,025   150,063   (139,038)
Professional fees (includes related party amounts of $266,400, and $180,000, respectively)  1,417,905   984,625   433,280 
Salary expenses  1,817,746   1,567,238   250,508 
Research and development  2,589,766   636,190   1,953,576 
Stock-based compensation  1,392,674   562,375   830,299 
Depreciation and amortization  420,722   (186,216)  606,938 
Other general and administrative expenses  1,009,070   645,068   364,002 
Total operating expenses  8,658,908   4,359,343   4,299,565 
Total operating loss $(8,597,099) $(4,124,606) $(4,472,493)
Other income (expenses):            
Interest and accretion expense  (829,770)  (4,189)  (825,581)
Change in fair value of contingent liabilities  (3,622,000)  278,000   (3,900,000)
Net loss $(13,048,869) $(3,850,795) $(9,198,074)

Revenue

We recognized revenue of $0.06 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022 compared to $0.23 million for the six months ended June 30, 2021. No revenue was generated in Q1 2022 due to COVID-19 impact on the Company’s supply chain in the fiscal 2021 and its ability to produce Duragraft inventory, but as anticipated, as the result of the executive and management teams efforts to re-establish the Company’s business relationships with its trusted manufacturing and distribution partners, the production of Duragraft inventory and sales resumed in Q2 2022.

Direct Costs of Revenue

Direct costs of revenue decreased by $0.14 million or 92.65% to $0.01 million for the first six months of 2022 compared to $0.15 million for the first six months of 2021. This was predominantly due to fewer units of product produced in the current period because of the shortage of the raw materials as a result of COVID-19.

Professional Fees

Professional fees increased by $0.43 million or 44% to $1.42 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022 compared to $0.98 million for the comparative period ended June 30, 2021. The increase in professional fees in the first half of 2022 can be attributed to legal support with preparation and filling of the S-1 form with the SEC, audit fees in connection with the audit of the 2021 10-K Form, and compensation costs incurred in connection with closing of the four rounds of the Unit Purchase Agreement financing. Related party professional fees increased by $0.09 million or 48% to $0.27 million from $0.18 million during the second quarter of 2022 compared to the second quarter of 2021 – the Company retained additional consulting services in order to advance development of its three medical technology platforms - DuraGraft, MATLOC and Krillase.

Salary Expenses

Salary expenses for the period ended June 30, 2022, were $1.82 million, a $0.25 million or 16% increase from the comparative period. The increase in the salary cost is attributable to the restructuring and growth of the organization as the Company restructured its executive and management teams in the late 2021 and continues to expand into the new markets and working towards commercialization of the DuraGraft in the United States.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2022, were $2.59 million, a $1.95 million or 307% increase from the comparative period. The increase in the research and development expenses can be mainly attributed to the Company’s acquisition of MATLOC 1 product in late 2021 and its focus on development and advancement of all its products – DuraGraft, Krillase, and MATLOC 1 towards commercialization.

23

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation for the first half of the 2022 increased by $0.83 million or 148% to $1.39 million if compared to the six months ended June 30, 2021. The increase in the stock-based compensation can be explained by additional 400,000 stock options granted in 2022 and 350,000 restricted share awards granted in late 2021, fair value of which have increased significantly from the stock options granted and outstanding in the comparative period due to the increased stock price period over period.

Other General and Administrative Expenses

Other general and administrative expenses increased $0.36 million or 56% to $1.01 million in the six months ended June 30, 2022. The increase was due to the Company’s non-legal fees related to the filing of S-1 form in the period, preparation toward the public offering, increased rent due to the lease of additional office and laboratory space, and expenses associated with running a public company. Due to the planned continued buildout of administrative and commercial functions we expect general and administrative expenses to increase in future periods.

Other Income (Expenses)

During the six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company incurred $0.83 million of interest and accretion costs associated with convertible notes issued at discount as part of the Units Offering Agreements. Additionally, the Company recognized $3.62 million of fair value loss from mark-to-market adjustments on the contingent liabilities assumed on the acquisition of Somah due to the change of the fair value of the contingent consideration.

LIQUIDUTY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

To date, we have incurred significant net losses and negative cash flows from operations. As of June 30, 2022, we had available cash of $2,044,976 and accumulated deficit of $60,872,432. We fund our operations through capital raises.

Private Placements

Unit Purchase Agreement

During the six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company issued a secured promissory note, dated October 26, 2012 (the “Note”), to Mr. Mooreadditional 3,322,929 units under the New Securities Unit Purchase Agreement for the gross proceeds of $5,815,138. Of the total 3,322,929 Units issued: (i) 159,245 Units were issued to settle notes payable assumed on acquisition of My Health Logic, (ii) 22,857 Units were issued to settle accounts payable, and 171,428 Units were issued in exchange for services rendered to the Company in the six months ended June 30, 2022. The remaining proceeds from this offering will be used to sustain the Company’s growth and meet its capital obligations.

Subsequent to the Q2 2022 end, on August 12, 2022, the Company conducted the final closing of the Unit Purchase Agreement, in which the Company issued to an investor Units consisting of a convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000, bearing$1,500,000, convertible into 857,142 shares of common stock, plus additional shares based on accrued interest, subject to adjustment, and a Class C Warrant for the purchase of 1,714,285 shares of common stock at $2.25 per share, subject to adjustment.

Public Offering

On February 14, 2021, Marizyme completed a ratepreliminary prospectus with intention to raise up to $17,250,000. As at the end of 20% per yearQ2 2022, the final prospectus has not yet been filed and maturing on the earlierfinal amount of the first anniversary dateoffering will be dependent on market conditions. The proceeds from the offering will be used by the Company (i) to develop its DuraGraft, MATLOC, and Krillase platforms; (ii) to commercialize and produce its products, and (iii) for general working capital and other corporate purposes. The management anticipates the offering to close in Q3 2022.

Funding Requirements and Other Liquidity Matters

Marizyme expects to continue to incur expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future. We anticipate that our expenses will increase as a result of the datefollowing operational and business development efforts:

Increase our expertise and knowledge through hiring and retaining qualified operational, financial and management personnel, who will build efficient infrastructure to support development and commercialization of therapies and devices,
Increase in research and development and legal expenses as we continue to develop our products, conduct clinical trials and pursue FDA clearances,  
Expand our product portfolio through the identification and acquisition of additional life science assets, and
Seek to increase awareness about our products to boost sales and distributions internationally.

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenues to support our cost structure, the Company will continue to have to raise funds beyond its current working capital balance in order to finance future development of issuance orproducts, potential acquisitions, and meet its debt obligations until such other time as described in more detail infuture profitable revenues are achieved.

We expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of private and public equity offerings, debt financings, government or other third-party funding, and collaborations arrangements or acquisitions. To the Note, without any penalty for prepayment. To secure the obligations of the Company under the Note, the Company granted Mr. Moore a secured priority security interest in the Company’s Accounts Receivable and its subsidiaries located in the United States of America, as more fully described in the full text of the document.

·In connection with the execution of the Loan Agreement, on October 26, 2012, the Company issued the Lender a common stock purchase warrant (the “Warrant”), pursuant to which the Lender is entitled to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 until the third anniversary date of the date of issuance. The Warrant was issued in a private transaction between the Company and the Lender and was exempt from registration under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, pursuant to Section 4(2) thereof. On October 16, 2013, Mr. Moore exercised the right to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at the price of $0.35.

In the future, the Company may supplement its liquidity to fund its operations or implement its business strategyextent that we raise additional capital through the sale of common stock, convertible securities or other equity securities, the ownership interest of our stockholders may be materially diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights of our common stockholders. Debt financing and preferred equity financing, if available, would result in increased fixed payment obligations and may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends, that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. Securing additional financing could require a substantial amount of time and attention from our management and may divert a disproportionate amount of their attention away from day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our management’s ability to oversee the development or acquisition of product.

24

If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution, or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt securitiesfinancings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or through shortterminate our product development or long term loans. However, there can be no assurancesfuture commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company will be successful in consummating any such financings on favorable terms, if at all.Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

Cash Flows

 

The following table sets forth a summary of the net cash flow activity for each of the periods indicated:

  For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
  2013  2012 
       
Net cash provided (used in) Operating Activities $1,355,523  $(2,634,297)
Net cash provided (used) by Discontinued $  $63,246 
Net cash provided (used in) Investing Activities $487,309  $(2,491,803)
Net cash provided (used in) Financing Activities $(2,389,541) $2,548,096 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash $(348,280) $6,991 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents during the period $(894,988) $(2,507,867)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period $1,154,602  $3,250,821 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $259,614  $742,954 

  Six Months Ended June 30,  
  2022 2021 $ Change
Net Cash provided by/(used in):            
Operating activities $(7,055,675) $(2,975,603) $(4,080,072)
Financing activities  5,028,312   74,945   4,953,367 
Net change in cash $(2,027,363) $(2,900,658) $873,295 

Operating Activities

 

Net cash provided byused in operating activities forwas approximately $7.06 million and $3.0 million in the nine month periodsix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2013 was $ 1,355,523 compared to2022 and 2021, respectively. The net cash used in operating activities of $2,634,397 and net cash provided by discontinued operation of $63,246 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2012, an increase of approximately $3,989,920. This change is due to the effects of a group wide cost reduction program and due to a reduction in operating Net Loss of approximately $ 2,090,934, decrease in Accounts Receivable, Prepaid Assets and other Non Current Assets of approximately $ 2,140,311, Gains on Sale of Assets of approximately $ 1,566,119, Deferred Income Taxes of approximately $ 1,477,813, shares issued in lieu of Interest and Consulting expense of approximately $ 269,288, Depreciation and Amortization of approximately $109,817, Gains from Equity Investment of approximately $ 26,751 and increase in Retirement Benefit Obligation of $ 6,538. This is offset with a write off of Goodwill of approximately $ (3,079,168). change in Inventory of approximately $ (140,929) and increase in the paymentfirst half of Accounts Payable and other liabilities of approximately $ (477,522).

Net cash provided by investing activities during the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 was $ 487,309 compared to cash used by investing activities in the comparative period ended September 30, 2012 of $ 2,491,803, increasing by approximately $ 2,797,112. The increase2022, was due to cash provided by the Sale of Intangible Assets of approximately $ 4,146,894,$1.42 million spent on professional fees, $1.82 million spent on salaries and cash provided by the Sale of property plantrelated compensation expenses and equipment of $ 579,206 as offset by a$2.59 million spent on research and development activities. The net change in Financial Assetsoperating assets and liabilities primarily related to $0.25 million spent on the manufacturing of approximately $ (1,928,988). Duragraft product in the period and a $1.88 million increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and amounts due to related parties in support of the growth of our research and development and other operating activities.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities during the nine month period ended September 30, 2013 was $ 2,389,541 compared to net cash provided by financing activities in the comparative period ended September 30, 2012 of $ 2,548,096 decreasing by approximately $ 4,937,637 for the nine month periodsix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2013. This change2022 was due to a $ 3,483,175 reduction$5.12 million of funds raised from the issuance of promissory notes pursuant to the Unit Purchase Agreement, net of issuance costs. During the six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company also settled an aggregate of $0.33 million in capital paid-in, coupled with cash used by net borrowings from banksnotes payable as part of $ 902,508the Unit Purchase Agreement issuances and repaid $0.1 million in notes payable assumed on the acquisition of My Health Logic.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

Other than disclosed below, there were no material changes outside the ordinary course of our business during the six months ended June 30, 2022 to the information regarding our contractual obligations that was disclosed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in our 2021 Form 10-K.

Royalties and Other Commitments

Upon receiving the FDA clearance for the DuraGraft and other key intellectual products, the Company will:

Grant of performance warrants to Somah, for 4,000,000 restricted common shares of the Company, with a strike price determined based on the average of the closing prices of the common shares for the 30 calendar days following the date of the public announcement of FDA clearance;  
Pay royalties on all net sales of the product acquired from Somah of 6% on the first $50 million of international net sales (and 5% on the first $50 million of U.S. net sales), 4% for greater than $50 million up to $200 million, and 2% for greater than $200 million;
Pay 10% of cash value of the rare pediatric voucher sales following the FDA clearance and subsequent sale to an unaffiliated third party of a rare pediatric voucher based on Somah’s DuraGraft product;  
Grant of rare pediatric voucher warrants to purchase an aggregate of 250,000 commons shares with a term of five years and a strike price determined based on the average of the closing prices of the common shares for the 30 calendar days following the date of the public announcement of FDA clearance, and
Pay a liquidation preference, up to a maximum of $20 million upon the sale by the Company of all or substantially all of the assets relating to the Somah products. Upon the sale of either or both of the DuraGraft or Somah derived solid organ transplant products, the Company will pay 15% of the net sale proceeds towards the liquidation preference maximum amount.

Lease Commitments

The Company has entered into arrangements for office and laboratories spaces. As at June 30, 2022, minimum lease payments towards related party loans of $ 2,087,437. Other borrowings provided approximately$ 1,535,482.in relation to lease commitments were payable as outlined in Note 5 to the interim consolidated financial statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

The preparationOur management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in conformityaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. The preparation of Americaour financial statements requires managementus to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, and liabilities and disclosuresexpenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date ofin our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenuesaccompanying notes. We evaluate these estimates and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.   The areas where critical estimates were made that have significant importance to the financial statements are as follows:

i.      Allowance for doubtful accounts. The company provides for potential bad debtsjudgments on an account-by-accountongoing basis. Bad debts have not been significantWe base our estimates on historical experience and our allowance has been accurate. Non-trade receivableson various other factors that we believe are also scrutinized and allowedreasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for based on expected recovery.

ii.     Allocation ofmaking judgments about the price paid when acquiring subsidiaries.  When the Company acquires subsidiary companies an allocation of the purchase is required.  The allocation is based on management’s analysis of thecarrying value of the net assets and is based on estimated future cash flows that each component will produce.  Such components might include software, customer lists and other intangible assetsliabilities that are not readily determinable.  The allocation hasapparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

For a significant impact ondescription of our critical accounting policies, please see the future earningssection entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” contained in our 2021 Form 10-K. There have not been any material changes to the critical accounting policies discussed therein during the six months ended June 30, 2022.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2022, the Company as certain assets, customer lists for example, must be amortized and chargedhas no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to operations over time, while other assets, notably goodwill, does not.

iii.     Impairment testing on intangibles and goodwill.  As noted in more detail below, these areas involve numerous estimates as to expected cash flows, expected rates of return and other factors that are difficult to determine and are often out of the Company’s direct control. 

iv.     Valuation of deferred tax credits.  The Company provides an allowance for tax recoveries arising from the application of losses carried forward.  An allowance is provided where management has determined that it is less than likely that the loss will be applied and income taxes recovered.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company adopted FASB Codification topic (“ASC”) 220, Reporting Comprehensive Income, which establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. Comprehensive income consists of net income and other gains and losses affecting stockholder's equity that are excluded from net income, such as unrealized gains and losses on investments available for sale, foreign currency translation gains and losses and minimum pension liability. Since inception, the Company’s other comprehensive income represents foreign currency translation adjustments and small net actuarial losses on pension plans.

Net Income per Common Share

FASB Codification topic (“ASC”) 260, Earnings per share, requires dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) withhave a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the EPS computations. Basic earnings per share amounts are based on the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding. If applicable, diluted earnings per share would assume the conversion, exercisecurrent or issuance of all potential common stock instruments such as options, warrants and convertible securities, unless the effect is to reduce a loss or increase earnings per share. Diluted net income (loss) per share on the potential exercise of the equity-based financial instruments is not presented where anti-dilutive. Accordingly, although the diluted weighted average number of common stock outstanding is disclosed on the statements of operation, the calculated net loss per share is the same for bother basic and diluted as both are based on the basic weighted average of common stock outstanding. There were no adjustments required to net income for the period presented in the computation of diluted earnings per share.

Financial Instruments

Financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, financial assets, notes payable, liabilities to banks, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other liabilities.  As of the financial statement date, the Company does not hold any derivate financial instruments. Financial assets and liabilities are measured upon first recognition and reviewed at the financial statement date.  Changes in fair value are recognized through profit and loss.  Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to significant interest or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

Currency Risk

We use the US dollar as our reporting currency.  The functional currencies of our significant foreign subsidiaries are the local currency, which includes the Euro, the British pound, and the Indian rupee.  Accordingly, some assets and liabilities are incurred in those currencies and we are subject to foreign currency risks.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company follows FASB Codification topic (ASC”) 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, for all financial instruments and non-financial instruments accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis. This new accounting standard establishes a single definition of fair value and a framework for measuring fair value, sets out a fair value hierarchy to be used to classify the source of information used in fair value measurement and expands disclosures about fair value measurements required under other accounting pronouncements. It does not change existing guidance as to whether or not an instrument is carried at fair value. The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received from selling an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. When determining the fair value measurements for assets and liabilities, which are required to be recorded at fair value, the Company considers the principal or most advantageous market in which the Company would transact and the market-based risk measurements or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, such as inherent risk, transfer restrictions and credit risk.

The Company has adopted (“ASC”) 825, Financial Instruments, which allows companies to choose to measure eligible financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that are not required to be measured at fair value. The Company has not elected the fair value option for any eligible financial instruments.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.

Inventories

Pursuant to ASC 330 (Inventories), inventories held for sale are recognized under inventories. Inventories were measured at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a first-in-first out basis, without any overhead component.

Goodwill and other Intangible Assets

Intangible assets predominately include goodwill, acquired software and capitalized software development. Intangible assets acquired in exchange for payment are reflected at acquisition costs. If the development costs can be capitalized per ASC 985-20-25, these are reflected as ascribable personnel and overhead costs.

Company created software can be intended for sale to third parties or used by the Company itself. If the conditions for capitalization are not met, the expenses are recorded with theirfuture material effect on profit in the year in which they were incurred.

The Company amortizes intangible assets with a limited useful life to the estimated residual book value in accordance with ASC regulations. In addition, in special circumstances according to ASC 350-30, a recoverability test is performed and, if applicable, unscheduled amortization is considered.

The useful life of acquired software is between three and five years and three years for Company-designed software.

Intangible assets obtained as part of an acquisition which do not meet the criteria for a separate entry are identified as goodwill. Goodwill is reviewed once a year during an impairment test, whereby the appraised fair value of the invested capital of the reporting unit, is compared with the carrying (book) value of its invested capital amount (including goodwill.) Use value is generally applied in order to determine the recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets with an indefinite useful life. The projected financial plan prepared by the management serves as the basis for this determination of use value and the planning assumptions are each adjusted for the current state of knowledge. Reasonable assumptions regarding macroeconomic trends and historical developments are taken into account in making these adjustments. Future estimated cash flows are determined based on the expected growth rates of the markets in question.

If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the appraised fair value, the impairment based on use value measures the amount of loss, if any, and an unscheduled amortization expense is recorded. If the appraised value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered to be impaired.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are valued at acquisition or manufacturing costs, reduced by scheduled and, if necessary, unscheduled depreciation. Fixed assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis, prorated over their expected useful life. Scheduled depreciation is mainly based on useful lives of 3 to 10 years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated up to 40 years.

If fixed assets are sold, retired or scrapped, the profit or loss arising from the difference between the net sales proceeds and the residual book value are included under other operating earnings and expenses.

Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates the recoverability of its fixed assets and other assets in accordance with ASC topic, 360.10. This guidance requires recognition of impairment of long-lived assets in the event the net book value of such assets exceeds its’ expected cash flows or appraised value In this instance, the asset is considered to be impaired and is written down to fair value.

Revenue Recognition

License Revenues

Our license revenues consist of revenues earned from the licensing of our software products. These products are generally licensed on a perpetual basis. Pricing models have generally been based either upon the physical infrastructure, such as the number of physical desktop computers or servers, on which our software runs or on a per user basis. License revenues are recognized when the elements of revenue recognition for the licensed software are complete, generally upon electronic shipment of the software and the software key to provide full access to all functionalities for our customers. In general our invoices reflect license, service and maintenance components. In the case of multi element contracts, the revenues allocated to the software license in most cases represent the residual amount of the contract after the fair value of the other elements has been determined. Certain products of our software offering are licensed on a subscription basis.

Software Maintenance Revenues

Software maintenance revenues are recognized ratably on a pro-rata basis over the range of the contract period. Our contract periods typically range from one to five years. Vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) of fair value for software maintenance services is established by the rates charged in stand-alone sales of software maintenance contracts or the stated renewal rate for software maintenance. Customers who are party to software maintenance agreements with us are entitled to receive support, product updates and upgrades on a when-and-if-available basis.

Professional Services Revenues

Professional services include pre-project consulting, software design, customization, project management, implementation and training. Professional services are not considered essential to the functionality of our products, as these services do not alter the product capabilities and may be performed by our customers or by other vendors. Professional services engagements performed for a fixed fee, for which we are able to make reasonably dependable estimates of progress toward completion, are recognized on a proportional performance basis based on hours incurred and estimated hours of completion. Professional services engagements that are on a time and materials basis are recognized based on hours incurred. Revenues on all other professional services engagements are recognized upon completion. Our professional services may be sold with software products or on a stand-alone basis. Vendor Specific Objective Evidence (VSOE) of fair value for professional services is based upon the standard rates we charge for such services when sold separately.

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currency of the Company is US dollars. For financial reporting purposes, the financial statements of GROUP were translated into US dollars. Assets and liabilities were translated at the exchange rates at the balance sheet dates and revenue and expenses were translated at the average exchange rates and stockholders’ equity was translated at historical exchange rates. Any translation adjustments resulting are not included in determining net income but are included in foreign exchange adjustment to other comprehensive income, a component of stockholders’ equity.

Other Provisions

According to FASB ASC 450 Contingencies, provisions are made whenever there is a current obligation to third parties resulting from a past event which is likely in the future to lead to an outflow of resources and of which the amount can be reliably estimated. Provisions not already resulting in an outflow of resources in the following year are recognized at their discounted settlement amount on the financial statement date. The discount taken is based on market interest rates. The settlement amount also includes the expected cost increases. Provisions are not set off against contribution claims. If the amended estimate leads to a reduction of the obligatory amount, the provision is proportionally reversed and the earnings are recognized in other operating earnings.

Deferred Taxes

Income taxes are provided in accordance with FASB Codification topic 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. A deferred tax asset or liability is recorded for all temporary differences between financial and tax reporting and net operating loss-carry forwards.

Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that, some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effect ofcondition, changes in tax laws and rates on the datefinancial condition, revenues or expenses, results of enactment.operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

25

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Goodwill for Impairment. With the objective of reducing the cost and complexity of performing an impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets by simplifying how an entity tests those assets for impairment and to improve consistency in impairment testing guidance among long-loved asset categories. The amendments permit an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test in accordance with Subtopic 350-30, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - General Intangibles Other than Goodwill. The more-likely-than-not threshold is defined as having the likelihood of more than 50 percent. The amendments are effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed beginning April 1, 2013. Adoption of this new standard is not expected to have significant impact to the Company’s financial statement.

Principles of Consolidation and Reverse Acquisition

As previously disclosed, the Company originally exchanged a total of 5,405,411 shares of common stock in exchange for 50.1% of the outstanding common shares of GROUP (and retained its 50.1% shareholding by acquiring an additional 883,765 shares of GROUP on February 27, 2012). Although the Company was the legal acquirer, the transaction was accounted for as a recapitalization of GROUP in the form of a reverse merger, whereby GROUP became the accounting acquirer and was deemed to have retroactively adopted the capital structure of the Corporation. Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the historical consolidated financial statements of GROUP for all periods presented, and do not include the historical financial statements of the Company. All costs associated with the reverse merger transaction were expensed as incurred. Those expenses totaled approximately $300,000 and were included in professional fees in administrative expenses.

The Company has based its financial reporting for the consolidation with GROUP in accordance with FASB Accounting Standard Codification (ASC) 805-40 as it relates to reverse acquisitions. Goodwill has been measured as the excess of the fair value of the consideration effectively transferred by the Company, the acquiree, for financial reporting purposes, over the net amount of the Company’s recognized identifiable assets and liabilities.

We have recorded the acquired assets and liabilities of GBSX on the acquisition date of January 6, 2011, at their fair value and the operations of GBSX have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date.

The assets and liabilities of GROUP, the acquirer for financial reporting purposes, are measured and recognized in the consolidated financial statements at their precombination carrying amounts in accordance with ASC 805-40-45-2(a). Therefore, in a reverse acquisition, the non-controlling interest reflects the non-controlling shareholders’ proportionate interest in the pre-combination carrying amounts of GROUP’s net assets even though the non-controlling interests in other acquisitions are measured at their fair values at the acquisition date.

 .

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have not entered into any other financial guarantees or other commitments to guarantee the payment obligations of any third parties. We have not entered into any derivative contracts that are indexed to our shares and classified as shareholder’s equity or that are not reflected in our consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, we do not have any retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to an unconsolidated entity that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity. We do not have any variable interest in any unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit support to us or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.

ItemITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

N/ANot applicable.

ItemITEM 4. Controls and Procedures.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

EvaluationConclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of September 30, 2013, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and our Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer),We evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) promulgatedas defined by Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act as of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation,the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, with the participation, and under the supervision, of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). Based upon this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that as of SeptemberJune 30, 2013,2022, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective in ensuringineffective due to the material weakness described below.

Disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of an issuer that theare designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that we fileit files or submitsubmits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’sSEC’s rules and forms, including ensuringforms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that such material information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to ourthe issuer’s management, including our Chief Executive Officerits principal executive and our Chief Financial Officer,principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. A material weakness in disclosure controls and procedures includes a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the registrant’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the company’s internal controls.

 

As previously reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, management concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to the existence of a material weakness in the design and operating effectiveness of internal controls related to inadequate internal technical staffing levels and lack of board or management oversight. In connection with our preparation of our interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2022, we identified material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures due to the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting related to the following:

We did not maintain a sufficient complement of internal personnel with appropriate knowledge, experience and/or training commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. We relied on outside consulting technical experts and did not maintain adequate internal qualified personnel to properly supervise and review the information provided by the outside consulting technical experts to ensure certain significant complex transactions and technical matters were properly accounted for.
In addition, we did not have proper segregation of duties in certain areas of our financial reporting process. The areas where we had a lack of segregation of duties include cash receipts and disbursements, approval of purchases and approval of accounts payable invoices for payment.
We did not have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure the timely, effective review of assumptions used in measuring the fair value of certain financial instruments. We did not have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure the timely, effective review of compliance with contractual covenants in certain financial instruments, and
We did not have an independent audit committee to oversee the financial reporting processes and reporting.

To remediate the material weaknesses described above, in addition the measures that management has taken as described under “Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

As previously reported by” below, management will continue to add controls to further enhance and revise the Company on a Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 10, 2013, on July 10, 2013, the Board of Directorsdesign of the Company reappointed Joerg Ott asexisting controls including:

Establishing policies and procedures to ensure timely review, by qualified personnel, of assumptions used in measuring fair value of certain financial instruments.
Reassessing the design and operation of internal controls over financial reporting and review procedures over the preparation of our financial statements.
Hiring permanent accounting personnel and the use of consultants to provide support during our quarterly and annual preparation, review, and reporting of our financial statements.
Maintaining adequate internal qualified personnel to properly supervise and review the information provided by the outside consulting technical experts to ensure certain significant complex transactions and technical matters were properly accounted for.

We believe these measures will remediate the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, effective immediately. Mr. Ott replaced Mr. Gary D. MacDonald who had been serving as the Company’s Interim Chief Executive Officer since July 11, 2012.

Also as previously reported by the Company on a Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 2, 2013, on August 2, 2013, Gary D. MacDonald resigned as member of the Board of Directors of the Company and as, Managing Director of GBS-UK. From March 1, 2012 to the date of his resignation, Mr. MacDonald also served as member of the Board’ Audit Committee. Mr. MacDonald’s resignation was not due to any disagreement with the Company or the Board.

Other than the foregoing, during the quarter ended September 30, 2013, there were no changesmaterial weakness in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, ourand disclosure controls and procedures described above by the fourth quarter of 2022.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

As discussed above, the management is working on remediating the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting.reporting identified above. In the six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company took the following steps in order to improve its internal controls over financial reporting:

The Board of Directors of the Company was increased from five to seven members,
A new Chair of the Audit Committee was appointed that the Board determined to be an “audit committee financial expert” as defined under Item 407(d)(5)(ii) and (iii) of Regulation S-K,
The Company retained services of multiple financial consultants, who provide their advice and expertise in audit, valuation, and financial reporting services.

During the second half of the fiscal 2022, management of the Company will continue to work on addressing to remediate the material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting described above by the fourth quarter of 2022.

26

PART II-OTHERII. OTHER INFORMATION

ItemITEM 1. Legal Proceedings.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise, in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. Other than the legal proceedings described below, we are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

DeVito Litigation

On October 23, 2013,June 7, 2022, Nicholas DeVito, a former Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, filed a lawsuit (GBS Enterprises, Inc. v. Reliance Globalcom, Inc.)Complaint in the SuperiorCircuit Court of the StateFifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, Case No. 50-2022-CA-005437, against the Company (the “DeVito Complaint”). The DeVito Complaint claimed breach of California, Countycontract, breach of San Francisco, seekingan implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unjust enrichment against the Company with respect to the Company’s alleged breach of the common stock issuance requirements of an Incentive Stock Option Agreement between Mr. DeVito and the Company, dated as of July 13, 2019 (the “DeVito ISO”). Under the DeVito ISO, on July 13, 2019, the Company issued an option to Mr. DeVito to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock at $1.01 per share, subject to certain vesting terms. The DeVito ISO provided that it would terminate twelve (12) months after the end of Mr. DeVito’s “Continuous Service,” which was not defined by the DeVito ISO. On August 27, 2020, as part of a declaratory judgmentMutual Release of Claims Agreement between Mr. DeVito and the Company dated as of that date (the “DeVito Release”), the Company agreed to immediately vest the unvested portion of the DeVito ISO such that the DeVito ISO became fully vested. Under the DeVito Release, Mr. DeVito agreed, among other things, to resign from his positions as Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer effective September 1, 2020, and provide certain transitional services for the month of September 2020. The DeVito Release also recited that the Company requested that Mr. DeVito be available for additional consulting going forward as the needs of the business dictate. The DeVito Complaint alleged that Mr. DeVito continued his role as an advisor and consultant to the Company. However, the Company believes that, pursuant to the DeVito ISO’s forfeiture terms and Mr. DeVito’s resignations from his officer positions on September 1, 2020 and end of transitional services as of September 30, 2020, the option expired unexercised one year after September 30, 2020, or on September 30, 2021. Due to the Company’s alleged nonperformance of Mr. DeVito’s exercise rights under the DeVito ISO, the DeVito Complaint seeks declaratory relief, specific performance, direct and consequential damages in an unspecified amount of more than $30,001.00, damages prescribed by the DeVito ISO, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, prejudgment interest, and such other relief as the court deems equitable. The Company denies any liability and believes the Complaint is without merit. The response to the Complaint is due by July 25, 2022. As of August 2022, this case is pending.

Chandler Litigation

On January 28, 2022, we filed a Complaint in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida (the “Florida Circuit Court”), case number 50-2022-CA-000859-XXX-MB, against Amy Chandler (the “Chandler Complaint”). The Chandler Complaint seeks damages for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, negligence, conversion, and civil theft. The Chandler Complaint alleged that, approximately two months before her resignation in September 2021, Ms. Chandler intentionally and recklessly took affirmative actions to cancel the CE certificate required by European Union regulations in order for Marizyme and its subsidiary, Somahlution, LLC, to ship and distribute certain products to/within the European Union, and disregarded her fiduciary duty to Marizyme and responsibilities as its former Executive Vice President for Regulatory Affairs and Quality Management Systems. As a result, the Chandler Complaint alleged that Ms. Chandler’s actions caused significant disruption and damage to Marizyme’s business, including, but not limited to, financial damages and damage to Marizyme’s reputation and business relationships. The Chandler Complaint further alleged that prior to her last day, Ms. Chandler stole confidential, proprietary files governing Marizyme’s quality management system, which were required for essential internal business operations, and that Marizyme incurred significant costs to recreate these files. The Chandler Complaint alleged damages in excess of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000), exclusive of interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs.

On February 28, 2022, Ms. Chandler filed an Answer, Affirmative Defenses and Counterclaim to Plaintiff’s Complaint with the Florida Circuit Court (the “Chandler Countercomplaint”). The Chandler Countercomplaint denied the claims in the Chandler Complaint and most of the factual allegations regarding her alleged actions. The Chandler Countercomplaint also included a counterclaim of defamation per se against the Company based on certain statements regarding this litigation that were included in the Registration Statement. As to the claims in the Chandler Complaint, the Chandler Countercomplaint demanded an award of attorneys’ fees and costs, court costs on all counts, and such further relief the court deems just and proper. As to the counterclaim of defamation, the Chandler Countercomplaint requested monetary damages, punitive damages, court costs, and any other relief the court deems just and proper. The Chandler Countercomplaint also demanded trial by jury on all triable issues.

On March 18, 2022, the Company filed a Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim with the Florida Circuit Court (the “Motion to Dismiss”). The Motion to Dismiss stated that the Chandler Countercomplaint for defamation per se should be dismissed with prejudice because the Company has no obligationnot made any statements about Chandler outside the allegations in the Chandler Complaint. The Motion to Reliance Globalcom Inc. (“Reliance”)Dismiss stated that the statements regarding this litigation that were included in the Registration Statement were as a matter of law not false because they all accurately reproduced the allegations in the Chandler Complaint and such statements were prefaced by the words “The Chandler Complaint alleged”. The Motion to Dismiss further stated that allegations in the litigation are subject to Florida’s litigation privilege and cannot serve as a basis for any claims or liabilitiesa defamation claim as a matter of law. On July 11, 2022, the court ruled that the counterclaim of defamation was dismissed with prejudice. As of August 2022, the remaining matters under litigation in connection with a Master Services Agreement (“MSA”) executed by Reliancethis case are pending.

27

Campbell/Harmon Litigation

On August 19, 2021, Dr. Neil Campbell, former President, Chief Executive Officer and IDC Global Inc. (“IDC”) a then wholly owned subsidiarydirector of the Company, and Bruce Harmon, former Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, each filed a Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial in March 2010. On February 1, 2013, GBS sold IDC to Global Telecom & Technology Inc.the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, case numbers No. 50-2021-CA-009938 and No. 50-2021-CA-009954, respectively, against the Company and Insperity Peo Services, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“GTT”Insperity”), a joint employer of Dr. Campbell and Mr. Harmon with the Company under a Client Service Agreement, dated November 30, 2020 (collectively, the “Campbell/Harmon Complaints”). Both Campbell/Harmon Complaints alleged that the Company and Insperity violated Section 448.105 of the Florida Private Whistleblower Act as a result of the constructive terminations of Dr. Campbell and Mr. Harmon after the occurrence of violations of federal and state law, including federal securities law, at the Company that exposed Dr. Campbell and Mr. Harmon to civil and criminal forms of liability and that the Company was not addressing to their satisfaction. Both of the Campbell/Harmon Complaints demanded approximately $30,000-$50,000 in back pay and benefits, interest on back pay, front pay and/or lost earning capacity, compensatory damages, costs and attorney’s fees, and such other relief as the court deems equitable.

Pursuant to a Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice filed in each of these cases, the governing Stock Purchase Agreement (SPA), GTT gained all right, titlearbitrator of these cases dismissed Dr. Campbell and interest in 100% of all of IDC’s stock, all of which had been owned by GBS. Pursuant toMr. Harmon’s actions with prejudice on April 18, 2022 and April 14, 2022, respectively, and the Stock Purchase Agreement, GTT withheld $528,777.93 of the purchase price from payment to GBS to cover potential exposure due to the Identified Dispute described herein between IDCcourt subsequently dismissed Dr. Campbell and Reliance. The Stock Purchase Agreement requires that, within three days of notice to GTT that the Identified Dispute described herein has been resolved, GTT will release the $528,777.93 to GBS. The Company is seeking declaratory relief from the Court stating the Company is not liable to RelianceMr. Harmon’s actions with prejudice on April 22, 2022 and that GTT may release the $528,777.93 in funds owed to the Company. There were no material developments in this case since the filing of the lawsuit.April 14, 2022, respectively.

The Company intends to vigorously defend its interests in this matter.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The disclosure required under this item is not requiredThere have been no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in out Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 filed with the SEC on March 31, 2022, which may be reported by small reporting companies; as such term is defined by Item 503(e) of Regulation S-K.accessed via EDGAR through the Internet at www.sec.gov.

ItemITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of ProceedsUNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

 

NoneDuring the three-month period ended June 30, 2022, we did not conduct any unregistered sales of our equity securities that were not previously disclosed in a current report of Form 8-K and we did not repurchase any of our common stock, other than as described below.

On May 11, 2022, we conducted an additional closing of our units private placement in which we issued a number of investors units consisting of convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,306,485, convertible into 746,563 shares of common stock, plus additional shares based on accrued interest, and Class C Warrants for the purchase of 1,493,119 shares of common stock at $2.25 per share.

On June 17, 2022, we conducted an additional closing of our units private placement in which we issued an investor units consisting of a convertible note in the aggregate principal amount of $500,000, convertible into 285,714 shares of common stock, plus additional shares based on accrued interest, subject to adjustment, and a Class C Warrant for the purchase of 571,428 shares of common stock at $2.25 per share, subject to adjustment.

The convertible notes mature 24 months after the applicable closing date and accrue 10% of simple interest per annum on the outstanding principal amount. The convertible notes’ principal and accrued interest can be converted at any time at the option of each holder at the conversion price. The convertible notes are secured by a first priority security interest in all assets of the Company. The convertible notes and Class C Warrants have certain antidilution provisions. The convertible notes and Class C Warrants have certain registration requirements for the shares of common stock underlying the convertible notes and Class C Warrants upon the final closing under the Unit Purchase Agreement between the Company and the investors in the units private placement, subject to the expiration of lock-up agreements between the units private placement investors and the representative of the underwriters for the Company’s anticipated public offering. The current Placement Agency Agreement and form of Unit Purchase Agreement relating to this private placement provide that up to $18 million and $17 million of units may be sold, respectively.

The Company engaged Univest Securities, LLC as the Company’s placement agent for this private placement. The Company paid Univest a cash placement fee equal to 8.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of the units and will pay Univest 8.0% of the gross proceeds from the exercise of the Class C warrants. In addition, in exchange for a $100 payment by Univest, the Company agreed to issue warrants to Univest to purchase an aggregate of 8.0% of the total number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the convertible notes issued in the private placement, with an exercise price equal to $1.75. These warrants, which may be exercised on a cashless basis, will be exercisable starting on the final closing date of this offering and will be exercisable for a period of five years from that date.

On June 26, 2022, in anticipation of the final closing of our units private placement and pursuant to our Placement Agency Agreement with Univest dated December 10, 2021, we issued Univest, as placement agent, a warrant for the purchase of 231,359 shares of common stock, and a warrant to Bradley Richmond, Univest’s designee, a warrant for the purchase of 347,039 shares of common stock. In accordance with the placement agency agreement, the warrants were issued in exchange for a $100 payment by Univest, and are exercisable on a cash or cashless net exercise basis, in aggregate, to purchase a number of shares of common stock equal to approximately 8% of the units sold in the units private placement. The warrants’ exercise price per share is equal to the price per unit of the units sold in the units private placement, currently $1.75, subject to adjustment. The warrants expire on June 26, 2027.

All of the securities issued in the private placement were sold pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and/or Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder.

28

Item

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

NoneNone.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

ItemITEM 5. Other Information.OTHER INFORMATION.

NoneNone.

60

ItemITEM 6. Exhibits.EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or incorporated by reference:

Exhibit No.Description
No.3.1DescriptionArticles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form SB-2 (File No: 333-146748) filed January 14, 2008)
3.2Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, effective September 6, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1(2) to Form 10-K filed on July 16, 2012)
31.1(1)3.3Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) CertificationCertificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, effective November 22, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.2 to Form 10-K/A filed on July 15, 2011)
3.4Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation regarding 1-for-29 Reverse Stock Split filed March 20, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.2 to Form 10 (File No. 000-53223) filed on September 12, 2018)
3.5Series A Non-Convertible Preferred Certificate of Designation filed May 11, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.6 to Form 10-12G filed on September 12, 2018)
3.6Certificate of Withdrawal of Certificate of Designation, effective January 25, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to Form S-1 filed on February 14, 2022)
3.7Articles of Merger between Marizyme, Inc. and GBS Enterprises Incorporated filed May 19, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.5 to Form 10 (File No. 000-53223) filed on September 12, 2018)
3.8Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form SB-2/A (File No: 333-146748) filed January 14, 2008)
3.9Certificate of Change Pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes Section 78.209, as filed by Marizyme, Inc. with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada on August 3, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2022)
4.1Form of 10% Secured Convertible Promissory Note issued by Marizyme, Inc., dated May 11, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Form 10-Q filed on May 16, 2022)
4.2Form of Class C Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by Marizyme, Inc., dated May 11, 2022 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Form 10-Q filed on May 16, 2022)
4.3*Form of 10% Secured Convertible Promissory Note issued by Marizyme, Inc., dated June 17, 2022
4.4*Form of Class C Common Stock Purchase Warrant issued by Marizyme, Inc., dated June 17, 2022
4.5*Form of Placement Agent Warrants issued on June 26, 2022 
10.1+First Amendment to Lease, dated March 16, 2022, between JIC Equities, LLC and Marizyme, Inc., dated
31.1*Certifications of Principal Executive Officer filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2*
31.2(1)Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) CertificationCertifications of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer filed pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1**
32.1(1)Section 1350 CertificationCertifications of Principal Executive Officer furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2**
32.2(1)Section 1350 CertificationCertifications of Principal Financial and Accounting Officer furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS*
101.INS (2)Inline XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*
101.SCH (2)Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*
101.CAL (2)Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*
101.LAB (2)XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.DEF (2)Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE (2)101.PRE*Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104*Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

* Filed herewith

** Furnished herewith

+ Indicates managementcontract or compensatory plan.

(1)Filed herewith.29

 

(2)To be filed by amendment.

SIGNATURES

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: August 15, 2022

MARIZYME, INC.

/s/ David Barthel
Name: David Barthel
Title: Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ George Kovalyov
Name: George Kovalyov
Title: Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

 GBS ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED
30 
Date: November 14, 2013By: /s/ JOERG OTT
Joerg Ott
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: November 14, 2013By: /s/ MARKUS R. ERNST
Markus R. Ernst
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

62