Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x

Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017.2019.

OR

¨

Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from                      to                     .

Commission File Number: file number: 001-32834

United States Oil Fund, LP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware20-2830691

Delaware

20-2830691

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)

Identification No.)

1999 Harrison Street,1850 Mt. Diablo Boulevard, Suite 1530640

Oakland, Walnut Creek, California 9461294596

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

(510) (510) 522-9600

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.x   Yes¨   No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).x   Yes¨   No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

x

Accelerated filer

¨

Non-accelerated filer

¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

¨

Emerging growth company

¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act.¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).¨   Yesx   No

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class:

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered:

Shares of United States Oil Fund, LP

USO

NYSE Arca, Inc.

The registrant had 206,500,000108,500,000 outstanding shares outstanding as of November 2,2017.5, 2019.

UNITED STATES OIL FUND, LP

Table of Contents

Page

Page

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Financial Statements.

1

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

16

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

33

34

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

34

35

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

34

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

34

36

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

34

36

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

34

36

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

35

36

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

35

36

Item 5. Other Information.

35

36

Item 6. Exhibits.

35

37

United States Oil Fund, LP

Condensed Statements of Financial Condition

At September 30, 20172019 (Unaudited) and December 31, 20162018

    

September 30, 2019

    

December 31, 2018

Assets

 

  

 

  

Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $1,325,617,585 and $1,223,159,803, respectively) (Notes 2 and 5)

$

1,325,617,585

$

1,223,159,803

Equity in trading accounts:

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $169,419,628 and $433,776,173, respectively)

 

169,419,628

 

433,776,173

Unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts

 

(66,680,740)

 

(194,392,958)

Receivable for shares sold

 

1,127,942

 

22,022,450

Dividends receivable

 

60,237

 

144,034

Interest receivable

 

32,281

 

29,030

Prepaid insurance*

79,410

31,698

Prepaid registration fees

 

149,298

 

579,117

ETF transaction fees receivable

 

2,000

 

2,000

 

 

  

Total assets

$

1,429,807,641

$

1,485,351,347

 

  

 

  

Liabilities and Partners’ Capital

 

  

 

  

Payable for shares redeemed

$

43,989,738

$

14,377,830

General Partner management fees payable (Note 3)

 

510,711

 

583,978

Professional fees payable

 

1,139,290

 

1,741,281

Brokerage commissions payable

 

89,961

 

89,961

Directors’ fees payable*

 

43,060

 

42,947

License fees payable

 

43,264

 

53,638

 

 

  

Total liabilities

 

45,816,024

 

16,889,635

 

  

 

  

Commitments and Contingencies  (Notes 3, 4 and 5)

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Partners’ Capital

 

  

 

  

General Partner

 

 

Limited Partners

 

1,383,991,617

 

1,468,461,712

Total Partners’ Capital

 

1,383,991,617

 

1,468,461,712

 

  

 

  

Total liabilities and partners’ capital

$

1,429,807,641

$

1,485,351,347

 

  

 

  

Limited Partners’ shares outstanding

 

122,700,000

 

153,200,000

Net asset value per share

$

11.28

$

9.59

Market value per share

$

11.34

$

9.66

* Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current presentation.

  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Assets        
Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $2,052,310,579 and $2,920,517,807, respectively)
(Notes 2 and 5)
 $2,052,310,579  $2,920,517,807 
Equity in trading accounts:        
Cash and cash equivalents (at cost $154,585,900 and $249,864,944, respectively)  154,585,900   249,864,944 
Unrealized gain (loss) on open commodity futures contracts  122,542,660   111,290,560 
Receivable for shares sold  33,387,540    
Dividends receivable  265,315   222,951 
Interest receivable  58,562    
Directors' fees and insurance receivable  11,035    
Prepaid registration fees  1,016,229   1,276,832 
ETF transaction fees receivable  2,000   5,000 
         
Total assets $2,364,179,820  $3,283,178,094 
         
Liabilities and Partners' Capital        
Payable due to Broker $53,119,135  $110,778,928 
Payable for shares redeemed     66,943,788 
General Partner management fees payable (Note 3)  906,095   1,256,212 
Professional fees payable  1,154,777   1,829,494 
Brokerage commissions payable  187,961   235,961 
Directors' fees and insurance payable     26,116 
License fees payable  89,665   150,926 
         
Total liabilities  55,457,633   181,221,425 
         
Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 3, 4 and 5)        
         
Partners' Capital        
General Partner      
Limited Partners  2,308,722,187   3,101,956,669 
Total Partners' Capital  2,308,722,187   3,101,956,669 
         
Total liabilities and partners' capital $2,364,179,820  $3,283,178,094 
         
Limited Partners' shares outstanding  221,100,000   265,000,000 
Net asset value per share $10.44  $11.71 
Market value per share $10.43  $11.72 

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

2

2

United States Oil Fund, LP

Condensed Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)

At September 30, 2017                        2019

Value/

Unrealized Gain

(Loss) on Open

% of

Notional

Number of

Commodity

Partners’

    

Amount

    

Contracts

    

Contracts

    

Capital

Open Futures Contracts – Long

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

United States Contracts

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

NYMEX WTI Crude Oil Futures CL November 2019 contracts, expiring October 2019*

$

1,450,710,530

 

25,597

$

(66,680,740)

 

(4.82)

  Notional
Amount
  Number of
Contracts
  Value/
Unrealized Gain
(Loss) on Open
Commodity
Contracts
  % of
Partners'
Capital
 
Open Futures Contracts - Long                
United States Contracts                
NYMEX WTI Crude Oil Futures CL November 2017 contracts, expiring October 2017* $2,186,176,280   44,682  $122,542,660   5.31 

  Principal
Amount
  Market
Value
    
Cash Equivalents   
United States Treasury Obligations            
U.S. Treasury Bills:            
0.90%, 10/05/2017 $75,000,000  $74,992,542   3.25 
0.92%, 10/12/2017  60,000,000   59,983,225   2.60 
0.91%, 10/19/2017  75,000,000   74,966,062   3.25 
0.95%, 10/26/2017  90,000,000   89,940,625   3.89 
0.97%, 11/02/2017  75,000,000   74,935,667   3.25 
1.01%, 11/09/2017  80,000,000   79,912,900   3.46 
0.98%, 11/16/2017  75,000,000   74,906,083   3.24 
1.05%, 11/24/2017  80,000,000   79,874,600   3.46 
1.05%, 11/30/2017  75,000,000   74,869,375   3.24 
1.08%, 12/07/2017  75,000,000   74,850,646   3.24 
1.09%, 12/14/2017  80,000,000   79,822,400   3.46 
1.11%, 12/21/2017  80,000,000   79,802,000   3.46 
1.10%, 12/28/2017  80,000,000   79,785,867   3.46 
1.12%, 1/04/2018  75,000,000   74,779,323   3.24 
1.11%, 1/11/2018  75,000,000   74,765,187   3.24 
1.10%, 1/18/2018  75,000,000   74,752,479   3.24 
1.12%, 1/25/2018  75,000,000   74,730,542   3.24 
1.12%, 2/01/2018  75,000,000   74,714,281   3.24 
1.13%, 2/08/2018  50,000,000   49,796,875   2.16 
1.12%, 2/15/2018  75,000,000   74,683,187   3.23 
1.10%, 2/22/2018  75,000,000   74,673,000   3.23 
1.09%, 3/01/2018  100,000,000   99,544,903   4.31 
1.14%, 3/08/2018  75,000,000   74,627,219   3.23 
1.14%, 3/15/2018  75,000,000   74,611,562   3.23 
1.16%, 3/22/2018  75,000,000   74,587,917   3.23 
1.17%, 3/29/2018  50,000,000   49,711,611   2.15 
Total Treasury Obligations      1,944,620,078   84.23 

Principal

Market

    

    

Amount

    

Value

    

Cash Equivalents

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

United States Treasury Obligations

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

U.S. Treasury Bills:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

2.40%, 10/03/2019

 

  

$

50,000,000

$

49,993,403

 

3.61

2.41%, 10/10/2019

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,970,187

 

3.61

2.42%, 10/17/2019

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,946,889

 

3.61

2.40%, 10/24/2019

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,924,292

 

3.61

2.37%, 10/31/2019

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,902,500

 

3.61

2.40%, 11/07/2019

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,877,951

 

3.60

2.38%, 11/14/2019

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,856,084

 

3.60

2.37%, 11/21/2019

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,834,250

 

3.60

2.33%, 11/29/2019

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,811,118

 

3.60

2.20%, 12/05/2019

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,803,194

 

3.60

2.16%, 12/12/2019

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,786,000

 

3.60

2.15%, 12/19/2019

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,766,840

 

3.60

2.07%, 12/26/2019

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,755,736

 

3.59

2.05%, 1/02/2020

 

  

 

25,000,000

 

24,869,219

 

1.80

2.03%, 1/09/2020

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,720,833

 

3.59

2.01%, 1/16/2020

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,705,007

 

3.59

2.04%, 1/23/2020

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,680,642

 

3.59

2.02%, 1/30/2020

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,664,225

 

3.59

1.89%, 2/06/2020

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,666,667

 

3.59

1.87%, 2/13/2020

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,652,187

 

3.59

1.85%, 2/20/2020

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,638,097

 

3.59

1.85%, 2/27/2020

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,621,292

 

3.58

1.83%, 3/05/2020

 

  

 

100,000,000

 

99,212,850

 

7.17

1.84%, 3/19/2020

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,570,278

 

3.58

1.88%, 3/26/2020

 

  

 

50,000,000

 

49,542,750

 

3.58

Total Treasury Obligations

 

  

 

  

 

1,268,772,491

 

91.68

United States - Money Market Funds

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Goldman Sachs Financial Square Funds - Government Fund - Class FS

 

  

 

65,000,000

 

65,000,000

 

4.70

Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds - Government Portfolio

 

  

 

25,000,000

 

25,000,000

 

1.80

Total Money Market Funds

 

  

 

  

 

90,000,000

 

6.50

Total Cash Equivalents

 

  

 

  

$

1,358,772,491

 

98.18

3

United States Oil Fund, LP
Condensed Schedule of Investments (Unaudited)(Continued)
At September 30, 2017

  Principal
Amount
  Market
Value
  % of
Partners'
Capital
 
United States - Money Market Funds            
Fidelity Investments Money Market Funds - Government Portfolio $100,000,000  $100,000,000   4.33 
Goldman Sachs Financial Square Funds - Government Fund - Class FS  50,000,000   50,000,000   2.17 
Morgan Stanley Institutional Liquidity Funds - Government Portfolio  100,000,000   100,000,000   4.33 
Total Money Market Funds      250,000,000   10.83 
Total Cash Equivalents     $2,194,620,078   95.06 

*   Collateral amounted to $154,585,900$169,419,628 on open futures contracts.

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

4

3

United States Oil Fund, LP

Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 20172019 and 20162018

  Three months ended
September 30, 2017
  Three months ended
September 30, 2016
  Nine months ended
September 30, 2017
  Nine months ended
September 30, 2016
 
Income                
Gain (loss) on trading of commodity futures contracts:                
Realized gain (loss) on closed futures contracts $135,353,709  $(384,554,840) $(257,378,501) $119,714,110 
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open futures contracts  128,797,560   303,367,830   11,252,100   270,039,300 
Dividend income  988,616   560,858   2,883,444   1,481,741 
Interest income*  5,365,328   2,300,456   12,400,479   6,369,237 
ETF transaction fees  110,000   82,000   268,000   236,000 
                 
Total income (loss)  270,615,213   (78,243,696)  (230,574,478)  397,840,388 
                 
Expenses                
General Partner management fees (Note 3)  2,943,845   3,619,261   9,401,948   11,462,884 
Professional fees  336,088   643,479   1,521,840   1,989,912 
Brokerage commissions  1,248,593   1,544,097   3,775,114   5,376,805 
Directors' fees and insurance  90,856   95,863   271,193   277,504 
License fees  98,128   120,642   313,398   382,096 
Registration fees  87,822   87,823   260,603   252,159 
                 
Total expenses  4,805,332   6,111,165   15,544,096   19,741,360 
                 
Net income (loss) $265,809,881  $(84,354,861) $(246,118,574) $378,099,028 
Net income (loss) per limited partnership share $0.97  $(0.56) $(1.27) $(0.02)
Net income (loss) per weighted average limited partnership share $1.00  $(0.28) $(0.91) $1.14 
Weighted average limited partnership shares outstanding  264,872,826   303,886,957   271,439,560   331,528,832 

Three months ended

Three months ended

Nine months ended

Nine months ended

    

September 30, 2019

    

September 30, 2018

    

September 30, 2019

    

September 30, 2018

Income

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Gain (loss) on trading of commodity futures contracts:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Realized gain (loss) on closed futures contracts

$

97,326,744

$

120,333,820

$

166,752,646

$

451,011,820

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open futures contracts

 

(185,598,630)

 

(77,520,980)

 

127,712,218

 

8,329,350

Realized gain (loss) on short-term investments

7,667

7,667

Dividend income

 

219,697

 

723,714

 

2,887,915

 

1,494,267

Interest income*

 

7,510,292

 

7,988,050

 

23,357,509

 

21,631,092

ETF transaction fees

 

93,000

 

77,000

 

247,000

 

273,000

 

 

 

 

Total income (loss)

 

(80,441,230)

 

51,601,604

 

320,964,955

 

482,739,529

 

 

 

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

General Partner management fees (Note 3)

 

1,550,198

 

1,984,921

 

5,020,150

 

6,293,684

Professional fees

 

317,592

 

409,589

 

1,123,411

 

1,379,811

Brokerage commissions

 

616,021

 

570,108

 

1,895,834

 

1,916,737

Directors’ fees and insurance

 

89,972

 

80,559

 

242,748

 

236,202

License fees

 

51,673

 

66,164

 

167,338

 

209,789

Registration fees

 

151,791

 

5,963

 

429,819

 

93,326

 

 

 

 

Total expenses

 

2,777,247

 

3,117,304

 

8,879,300

 

10,129,549

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$

(83,218,477)

$

48,484,300

$

312,085,655

$

472,609,980

Net income (loss) per limited partnership share

$

(0.85)

$

0.45

$

1.69

$

3.39

Net income (loss) per weighted average limited partnership share

$

(0.71)

$

0.40

$

2.48

$

3.41

Weighted average limited partnership shares outstanding

 

116,602,174

 

121,141,304

 

126,005,128

 

138,401,832

*   Interest income does not exceed paid in kind of 5%.

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

5

4

United States Oil Fund, LP

Condensed Statement of Changes in Partners'Partners’ Capital (Unaudited)

For the nine months ended September 30, 20172019

    

General Partner

    

Limited Partners

    

Total

Balances, at December 31, 2018

 

$

 

$

1,468,461,712

 

$

1,468,461,712

Addition of 228,100,000 partnership shares

2,666,878,546

2,666,878,546

Redemption of 258,600,000 partnership shares

(3,063,434,296)

(3,063,434,296)

Net income (loss)

312,085,655

312,085,655

Balances, at September 30, 2019

 

$

 

$

1,383,991,617

 

$

1,383,991,617

Net Asset Value Per Share:

At December 31, 2018

 

$

9.59

At September 30, 2019

 

$

11.28

  General Partner  Limited Partners  Total 
          
Balances, at December 31, 2016 $  $3,101,956,669  $3,101,956,669 
Addition of 348,000,000 partnership shares     3,482,048,137   3,482,048,137 
Redemption of 391,900,000 partnership shares     (4,029,164,045)  (4,029,164,045)
Net income (loss)     (246,118,574)  (246,118,574)
             
Balances, at September 30, 2017 $  $2,308,722,187  $2,308,722,187 
             
Net Asset Value Per Share:            
At December 31, 2016         $11.71 
At September 30, 2017         $10.44 

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

6

5

United States Oil Fund, LP

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

For the nine months ended September 30, 20172019 and 20162018

Nine months ended

Nine months ended

    

September 30, 2019

    

September 30, 2018

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

  

  

Net income (loss)

$

312,085,655

$

472,609,980

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

Unrealized (gain) loss on open futures contracts

 

(127,712,218)

 

(8,329,350)

(Increase) decrease in dividends receivable

 

83,797

 

(32,925)

(Increase) decrease in interest receivable

 

(3,251)

 

(6,326)

(Increase) decrease in prepaid insurance*

 

(79,410)

 

92,543

(Increase) decrease in prepaid registration fees

 

429,819

 

93,327

(Increase) decrease in ETF transaction fees receivable

 

 

1,000

Increase (decrease) in payable due to Broker

 

 

(57,283,329)

Increase (decrease) in General Partner management fees payable

 

(73,267)

 

(309,357)

Increase (decrease) in professional fees payable

 

(601,991)

 

(463,115)

Increase (decrease) in brokerage commissions payable

(50,000)

Increase (decrease) in directors' fees and insurance payable

 

(11,249)

 

Increase (decrease) in directors' fees payable*

 

43,060

 

(3,325)

Increase (decrease) in license fees payable

 

(10,374)

 

(17,286)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

184,150,571

 

406,301,837

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

  

 

Addition of partnership shares

 

2,687,773,054

 

2,587,435,194

Redemption of partnership shares

 

(3,033,822,388)

 

(3,361,478,783)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

(346,049,334)

 

(774,043,589)

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

(161,898,763)

 

(367,741,752)

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Equity in Trading Accounts, beginning of period

 

1,656,935,976

 

1,991,256,955

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Equity in Trading Accounts, end of period

$

1,495,037,213

$

1,623,515,203

Components of Cash and Cash Equivalents:

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

$

1,325,617,585

$

1,488,417,608

Equity in Trading Accounts:

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

169,419,628

 

135,097,595

Total Cash, Cash Equivalents and Equity in Trading Accounts

$

1,495,037,213

$

1,623,515,203

* Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current presentation.

  Nine months ended
September 30, 2017
  Nine months ended
September 30, 2016
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:        
Net income (loss) $(246,118,574) $378,099,028 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
(Increase) decrease in commodity futures trading account - cash and cash equivalents  95,279,044   311,843,294 
Unrealized (gain) loss on open futures contracts  (11,252,100)  (270,039,300)
(Increase) decrease in dividends receivable  (42,364)  (166,865)
(Increase) decrease in interest receivable  (58,562)   
(Increase) decrease in directors' fees and insurance receivable  (11,035)  (15,931)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid registration fees  260,603   (638,599)
(Increase) decrease in ETF transaction fees receivable  3,000    
Increase (decrease) in payable due to Broker  (57,659,793)  64,960,641 
Increase (decrease) in General Partner management fees payable  (350,117)  (25,434)
Increase (decrease) in professional fees payable  (674,717)  5,887 
Increase (decrease) in brokerage commissions payable  (48,000)  (25,000)
Increase (decrease) in directors' fees and insurance payable  (26,116)  (42,863)
Increase (decrease) in license fees payable  (61,261)  35,611 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  (220,759,992)  483,990,469 
         
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:        
Addition of partnership shares  3,448,660,597   3,046,756,478 
Redemption of partnership shares  (4,096,107,833)  (3,148,075,673)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (647,447,236)  (101,319,195)
         
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents  (868,207,228)  382,671,274 
         
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period  2,920,517,807   2,725,177,054 
Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period $2,052,310,579  $3,107,848,328 

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

7

6

United States Oil Fund, LP

Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

For the period ended September 30, 20172019 (Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

The United States Oil Fund, LP (“USO”) was organized as a limited partnership under the laws of the state of Delaware on May 12, 2005. USO is a commodity pool that issues limited partnership shares (“shares”) that may be purchased and sold on the NYSE Arca, Inc. (the “NYSE Arca”). Prior to November 25, 2008, USO’s shares traded on the American Stock Exchange (the “AMEX”). USO will continue in perpetuity, unless terminated sooner upon the occurrence of one or more events as described in its SixthSeventh Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership dated as of March 1, 2013December 15, 2017 (the “LP Agreement”). The investment objective of USO is for the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’ per share net asset value (“NAV”) to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, as measured by the daily changes in the price of the futures contract for light, sweet crude oil traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (the “NYMEX”) that is the near month contract to expire, except when the near month contract is within two weeks of expiration, in which case it will be measured by the futures contract will bethat is the next month contract to expire (the “Benchmark Oil Futures Contract”), plus interest earned on USO’s collateral holdings, less USO’s expenses.

USO’s investment objective isnot for its NAV or market price of shares to equal, in dollar terms, the spot price of light, sweet crude oil or any particular futures contract based on light, sweet crude oil,nor is USO’s investment objective for the percentage change in its NAV to reflect the percentage change of the price of any particular futures contract as measured over a time periodgreater than one day.

United States Commodity Funds LLC (“USCF”), the general partner of USO, believes that it is not practical to manage the portfolio to achieve such an investment goal when investing in Oil Futures Contracts (as defined below) and Other Oil-Related Investments (as defined below). USO accomplishes its objective through investments in futures contracts for light, sweet crude oil and other types of crude oil, diesel-heating oil, gasoline, natural gas and other petroleum-based fuels that are traded on the NYMEX, ICE Futures or other U.S. and foreign exchanges (collectively, “Oil Futures Contracts”) and other oil-related investments such as cash-settled options on Oil Futures Contracts, forward contracts for oil, cleared swap contracts and over-the-counter (“OTC”) transactions that are based on the price of crude oil, diesel-heating oil, gasoline, natural gas and other petroleum-based fuels, Oil Futures Contracts and indices based on the foregoing (collectively, “Other Oil-Related Investments”). As of September 30, 2017,2019, USO held 44,68225,597 Oil Futures Contracts for light, sweet crude oil traded on the NYMEX and did not hold any Oil Futures Contracts for light, sweet crude oil traded on the ICE Futures Europe.

USO commenced investment operations on April 10, 2006 and has a fiscal year ending on December 31. USCF is responsible for the management of USO. USCF is a member of the National Futures Association (the “NFA”) and became registered as a commodity pool operator with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”) effective December 1, 2005 and a swaps firm on August 8, 2013.

USCF is also the general partner of the United States Natural Gas Fund, LP (“UNG”), the United States 12 Month Oil Fund, LP (“USL”), and the United States Gasoline Fund, LP (“UGA”) and the United States Diesel-Heating Oil Fund, LP (“UHN”), which listed their limited partnership shares on the AMEX under the ticker symbols “UNG” on April 18, 2007, “USL” on December 6, 2007 and “UGA” on February 26, 2008 and “UHN” on April 9, 2008, respectively. As a result of the acquisition of the AMEX by NYSE Euronext, each of UNG’s, USL’s UGA’s and UHN’sUGA’s shares commenced trading on the NYSE Arca on November 25, 2008. USCF is also the general partner of the United States Short Oil Fund, LP (“DNO”), the United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP (“UNL”) and the United States Brent Oil Fund, LP (“BNO”), which listed their limited partnership shares on the NYSE Arca under the ticker symbols “DNO” on September 24, 2009, “UNL” on November 18, 2009 and “BNO” on June 2, 2010, respectively. USCF previously served as the general partner for the United States Short Oil Fund, LP (“DNO”) and the United States Diesel-Heating Oil Fund, LP (“UHN”), both of which were liquidated in 2018.

USCF is also the sponsor of the United States Commodity Index Funds Trust, a Delaware statutory trust, and each of its series, the United States Commodity Index Fund (“USCI”), the United States Copper Index Fund (“CPER”), the USCF Crescent Crypto Index Fund (“XBET”) and the United States Agriculture Index Fund (“USAG”). USAG was liquidated in 2018. XBET is currently in registration and the USCF Canadian Crude Oil Index Fund (“UCCO”), each a series of the United States Commodity Index Funds Trust.has not commenced operations. USCI CPER and USAGCPER listed their shares on the NYSE Arca under the ticker symbolsymbols “USCI” on August 10, 2010 and “CPER” on November 15, 2011, and “USAG” on April 13, 2012, respectively. UCCO is currently in registration and has not commenced operations.

7

In addition, USCF is the sponsor of the USCF Funds Trust, a Delaware statutory trust, and each of its series, the REX S&P MLP Fund and the REX S&P MLP Inverse Fund, which are currently in registration and have not commenced operations (together, the “REX Funds”), and the United States 3x Oil Fund (“USOU”) and the United States 3x Short Oil Fund (“USOD”), which commenced operationslisted their shares on the NYSE Arca on July 20, 2017.

2017  under the ticker symbols “USOU” and “USOD”, respectively.

All funds listed previously, other than UCCOXBET, USAG, DNO and the REX Funds,UHN, are referred to collectively herein as the “Related Public Funds.”

USO issues shares to certain authorized purchasers (“Authorized Participants”) by offering baskets consisting of 100,000 shares (“Creation Baskets”) through ALPS Distributors, Inc., as the marketing agent (the “Marketing Agent”). The purchase price for a Creation Basket is based upon the NAV of a share calculated shortly after the close of the core trading session on the NYSE Arca on the day the order to create the basket is properly received.

8

In addition, Authorized Participants pay USO a transaction fee of $1,000 fee for each order placed to create one or more Creation Baskets or to redeem one or more baskets (“Redemption Baskets”), consisting of 100,000 shares. Shares may be purchased or sold on a nationally recognized securities exchange in smaller increments than a Creation Basket or Redemption Basket. Shares purchased or sold on a nationally recognized securities exchange are not purchased or sold at the per share NAV of USO but rather at market prices quoted on such exchange.

In April 2006, USO initially registered 17,000,000 shares on Form S-1 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). On April 10, 2006, USO listed its shares on the AMEX under the ticker symbol “USO” and switched to trading on the NYSE Arca under the same ticker symbol on November 25, 2008. On that day, USO established its initial per share NAV by setting the price at $67.39 and issued 200,000 shares in exchange for $13,479,000. USO also commenced investment operations on April 10, 2006, by purchasing Oil Futures Contracts traded on the NYMEX based on light, sweet crude oil. As of September 30, 2017,2019, USO had registered a total of 3,127,000,0003,227,000,000 shares.

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the SEC and, therefore, do not include all information and footnote disclosure required under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The financial information included herein is unaudited; however, such financial information reflects all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are, in the opinion of USCF, necessary for the fair presentation of the condensed financial statements for the interim period.

NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The condensed financial statements have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP as detailed in the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification. USO is an investment company and follows the accounting and reporting guidance in FASB Topic 946.

Revenue Recognition

Commodity futures contracts, forward contracts, physical commodities and related options are recorded on the trade date. All such transactions are recorded on the identified cost basis and marked to market daily. Unrealized gains or losses on open contracts are reflected in the condensed statements of financial condition and represent the difference between the original contract amount and the market value (as determined by exchange settlement prices for futures contracts and related options and cash dealer prices at a predetermined time for forward contracts, physical commodities, and their related options) as of the last business day of the year or as of the last date of the condensed financial statements. Changes in the unrealized gains or losses between periods are reflected in the condensed statements of operations. USO earns income on funds held at the custodian or futures commission merchant (“FCM”) at prevailing market rates earned on such investments.

Brokerage Commissions

Brokerage commissions on all open commodity futures contracts are accrued on a full-turn basis.

8

Income Taxes

USO is not subject to federal income taxes; each partner reports his/her allocable share of income, gain, loss deductions or credits on his/her own income tax return.

In accordance with U.S. GAAP, USO is required to determine whether a tax position is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, including resolution of any tax related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. USO files an income tax return in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and may file income tax returns in various U.S. states. USO is not subject to income tax return examinations by major taxing authorities for years before 2014.2016. The tax benefit recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. De-recognition of a tax benefit previously recognized results in USO recording a tax liability that reduces net assets. However, USO’s conclusions regarding this policy may be subject to review and adjustment at a later date based on factors including, but not limited to, on-going analysis of and changes to tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof. USO recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax fees payable, if assessed. NoNaN interest expense or penalties have been recognized as of and for the period ended September 30, 2017.

9

2019.

Creations and Redemptions

Authorized Participants may purchase Creation Baskets or redeem Redemption Baskets only in blocks of 100,000 shares at a price equal to the NAV of the shares calculated shortly after the close of the core trading session on the NYSE Arca on the day the order is placed.

USO receives or pays the proceeds from shares sold or redeemed within threetwo business days after the trade date of the purchase or redemption. The amounts due from Authorized Participants are reflected in USO’s condensed statements of financial condition as receivable for shares sold and amounts payable to Authorized Participants upon redemption are reflected as payable for shares redeemed.

Authorized Participants pay USO a transaction fee of $1,000 for each order placed to create one or more Creation Baskets or to redeem one or more Redemption Baskets.

Partnership Capital and Allocation of Partnership Income and Losses

Profit or loss shall be allocated among the partners of USO in proportion to the number of shares each partner holds as of the close of each month. USCF may revise, alter or otherwise modify this method of allocation as described in the LP Agreement.

Agreement.

Calculation of Per Share NAV

USO’s per share NAV is calculated on each NYSE Arca trading day by taking the current market value of its total assets, subtracting any liabilities and dividing that amount by the total number of shares outstanding. USO uses the closing price for the contracts on the relevant exchange on that day to determine the value of contracts held on such exchange.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share

Net income (loss) per share is the difference between the per share NAV at the beginning of each period and at the end of each period. The weighted average number of shares outstanding was computed for purposes of disclosing net income (loss) per weighted average share. The weighted average shares are equal to the number of shares outstanding at the end of the period, adjusted proportionately for shares added and redeemed based on the amount of time the shares were outstanding during such period. There were no0 shares held by USCF at September 30, 2017.

2019.

Offering Costs

Offering costs incurred in connection with the registration of additional shares after the initial registration of shares are borne by USO. These costs include registration fees paid to regulatory agencies and all legal, accounting, printing and other expenses associated with such offerings. These costs are accounted for as a deferred charge and thereafter amortized to expense over twelve months on a straight-line basis or a shorter period if warranted.

9

Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents include money market funds and overnight deposits or time deposits with original maturity dates of six months or less.

Reclassification

Certain amounts in the accompanying condensed financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of condensed financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires USCF to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed financial statements, and the reported amounts of the revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions.

10

NOTE 3 — FEES PAID BY THE FUND AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

USCF Management Fee

Under the LP Agreement, USCF is responsible for investing the assets of USO in accordance with the objectives and policies of USO. In addition, USCF has arranged for one or more third parties to provide administrative, custody, accounting, transfer agency and other necessary services to USO. For these services, USO is contractually obligated to pay USCF a fee, which is paid monthly, equal to 0.45% per annum of average daily total net assets.

Ongoing Registration Fees and Other Offering Expenses

USO pays all costs and expenses associated with the ongoing registration of its shares subsequent to the initial offering. These costs include registration or other fees paid to regulatory agencies in connection with the offer and sale of shares, and all legal, accounting, printing and other expenses associated with such offer and sale. For the nine months ended September 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, USO incurred $260,603$429,819 and $252,159,$93,326, respectively, in registration fees and other offering expenses.

Independent Directors’ and Officers’ Expenses

USO is responsible for paying its portion of the directors’ and officers’ liability insurance for USO and the Related Public Funds and the fees and expenses of the independent directors who also serve as audit committee members of USO and the Related Public Funds. USO shares the fees and expenses on a pro rata basis with each Related Public Fund, as described above, based on the relative assets of each Related Public Fund computed on a daily basis. These fees and expenses for the year ending December 31, 20172019 are estimated to be a total of $361,350$339,000 for USO and, in the aggregate for USO and the Related Public Funds, $539,350.

$543,500.

Licensing Fees

As discussed in Note 4 below, USO entered into a licensing agreement with the NYMEX on April 10, 2006, as amended on October 20, 2011. Pursuant to the agreement, USO and the Related Public Funds, other than BNO, USCI, CPER, USOU and USAG,USOD, pay a licensing fee that is equal to 0.015% on all net assets. During the nine months ended September 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, USO incurred $313,398$167,338 and $382,096,$209,789, respectively, under this arrangement.

Investor Tax Reporting Cost

The fees and expenses associated with USO’s audit expenses and tax accounting and reporting requirements are paid by USO. These costs are estimated to be $2,100,000$1,500,000 for the year ending December 31, 2017.2019. Tax reporting costs fluctuate between years due to the number of shareholders during any given year.

10

Other Expenses and Fees

In addition to the fees described above, USO pays all brokerage fees and other expenses in connection with the operation of USO, excluding costs and expenses paid by USCF as outlined inNote 4 – Contracts and Agreements below.

NOTE 4 — CONTRACTS AND AGREEMENTS

Marketing Agent Agreement

USO is party to a marketing agent agreement, dated as of March 13, 2006, as amended from time to time, with the Marketing Agent and USCF, whereby the Marketing Agent provides certain marketing services for USO as outlined in the agreement. The fees of the Marketing Agent, which are borne by USCF, include a marketing fee of $425,000 per annum plus the following incentive fee: 0.00% on USO’s assets from $0 – $500 million; 0.04% on USO’s assets from $500 million – $4 billion and 0.03% on USO'sUSO’s assets in excess of $4 billion. In no event may the aggregate compensation paid to the Marketing Agent and any affiliate of USCF for distribution-related services exceed 10% of the gross proceeds of USO’s offering.

The above fee does not include website construction and development, which are also borne by USCF.

11

Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. Agreements

USO is also party to a custodian agreement, dated March 13, 2006, as amended from time to time, with Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (“BBH&Co.”) and USCF, whereby BBH&Co. holds investments on behalf of USO. USCF pays the fees of the custodian, which are determined by the parties from time to time. In addition, USO is party to an administrative agency agreement, dated March 13, 2006, as amended from time to time, with USCF and BBH&Co., whereby BBH&Co. acts as the administrative agent, transfer agent and registrar for USO. USCF also pays the fees of BBH&Co. for its services under such agreement and such fees are determined by the parties from time to time.

Currently, USCF pays BBH&Co. for its services, in the foregoing capacities, a minimum amount of $75,000 annually for its custody, fund accounting and fund administration services rendered to USO and each of the Related Public Funds, as well as a $20,000 annual fee for its transfer agency services. In addition, USCF pays BBH&Co. an asset-based charge of (a) 0.06% for the first $500 million of the Related Public Funds’ combined net assets, (b) 0.0465% for the Related Public Funds’ combined net assets greater than $500 million but less than $1 billion, and (c) 0.035% once the Related Public Funds’ combined net assets exceed $1 billion. The annual minimum amount will not apply if the asset-based charge for all accounts in the aggregate exceeds $75,000. USCF also pays BBH&Co. transaction fees ranging from $7 to $15 per transaction.

11

Brokerage and Futures Commission Merchant Agreements

On October 8, 2013, USO entered into a brokerage agreement with RBC Capital Markets LLC (“RBC Capital” or “RBC”RBC”) to serve as USO’s FCM effective October 10, 2013. The agreement with RBC requires it to provide services to USO in connection with the purchase and sale of Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments that may be purchased and sold by or through RBC Capital for USO’s account. In accordance with the agreement, RBC Capital charges USO commissions of approximately $7 to $8 per round-turn trade, including applicable exchange, clearing and NFA fees for Oil Futures Contracts and options on Oil Futures Contracts. Such fees include those incurred when purchasing Oil Futures Contracts and options on Oil Futures Contracts when USO issues shares as a result of a Creation Basket, as well as fees incurred when selling Oil Futures Contracts and options on Oil Futures Contracts when USO redeems shares as a result of a Redemption Basket. Such fees are also incurred when Oil Futures Contracts and options on Oil Futures Contracts are purchased or redeemed for the purpose of rebalancing the portfolio. USO also incurs commissions to brokers for the purchase and sale of Oil Futures Contracts, Other Oil-Related Investments or short-term obligations of the United States of two years or less (“Treasuries”).

For the nine months

For the nine months

 

ended

ended

 

    

September 30, 2019

    

September 30, 2018

 

Total commissions accrued to brokers

$

1,895,834

$

1,916,737

Total commissions as annualized percentage of average total net assets

 

0.17

%  

 

0.14

%

Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing

$

1,602,426

$

1,651,071

Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing

 

84.52

%  

 

86.14

%

Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity

$

293,408

$

265,666

Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity

 

15.48

%  

 

13.86

%

  For the nine months
ended September 30,
2017
  For the nine months
ended September 30,
2016
 
Total commissions accrued to brokers $3,775,114  $5,376,805 
Total commissions as an annualized percentage of average total net assets  0.18%  0.21%
Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing $3,311,727  $4,920,092 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing  87.73%  91.51%
Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity $463,387  $456,713 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity  12.27%  8.49%

The decrease in the total commissions accrued to brokers by USO for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, as2019, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016,2018, was due primarily to a lesserlower number of crude oil futures contracts being held and traded as a result of USO’s smaller size in terms of average net assets.traded.


NYMEX Licensing Agreement

USO and the NYMEX entered into a licensing agreement on April 10, 2006, as amended on October 20, 2011, whereby USO was granted a non-exclusive license to use certain of the NYMEX’s settlement prices and service marks. Under the licensing agreement, USO and the Related Public Funds, other than BNO, USCI, CPER, USOU and USAG,USOD, pay the NYMEX an asset-based fee for the license, the terms of which are described in Note 3. USO expressly disclaims any association with the NYMEX or endorsement of USO by the NYMEX and acknowledges that “NYMEX” and “New York Mercantile Exchange” are registered trademarks of the NYMEX.

12

NOTE 5 — FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISKS AND CONTINGENCIES

USO may engage in the trading of futures contracts, options on futures contracts, cleared swaps and OTC swaps (collectively, “derivatives”). USO is exposed to both market risk, which is the risk arising from changes in the market value of the contracts, and credit risk, which is the risk of failure by another party to perform according to the terms of a contract.

USO may enter into futures contracts, options on futures contracts and cleared swaps to gain exposure to changes in the value of an underlying commodity. A futures contract obligates the seller to deliver (and the purchaser to accept) the future delivery of a specified quantity and type of a commodity at a specified time and place. Some futures contracts may call for physical delivery of the asset, while others are settled in cash. The contractual obligations of a buyer or seller may generally be satisfied by taking or making physical delivery of the underlying commodity or by making an offsetting sale or purchase of an identical futures contract on the same or linked exchange before the designated date of delivery. Cleared swaps are agreements that are eligible to be cleared by a clearinghouse, e.g., ICE Clear Europe, and provide the efficiencies and benefits that centralized clearing on an exchange offers to traders of futures contracts, including credit risk intermediation and the ability to offset positions initiated with different counterparties.

The purchase and sale of futures contracts, options on futures contracts and cleared swaps require margin deposits with an FCM. Additional deposits may be necessary for any loss on contract value. The Commodity Exchange Act requires an FCM to segregate all customer transactions and assets from the FCM’s proprietary activities.

12

Futures contracts, options on futures contracts and cleared swaps involve, to varying degrees, elements of market risk (specifically commodity price risk) and exposure to loss in excess of the amount of variation margin. The face or contract amounts reflect the extent of the total exposure USO has in the particular classes of instruments. Additional risks associated with the use of futures contracts are an imperfect correlation between movements in the price of the futures contracts and the market value of the underlying securities and the possibility of an illiquid market for a futures contract. Buying and selling options on futures contracts exposes investors to the risks of purchasing or selling futures contracts.

All of the futures contracts held by USO through September 30, 20172019 were exchange-traded. The risks associated with exchange-traded contracts are generally perceived to be less than those associated with OTC swaps since, in OTC swaps, a party must rely solely on the credit of its respective individual counterparties. However, in the future, if USO were to enter into non-exchange traded contracts, it would be subject to the credit risk associated with counterparty non-performance. The credit risk from counterparty non-performance associated with such instruments is the net unrealized gain, if any, on the transaction. USO has credit risk under its futures contracts since the sole counterparty to all domestic and foreign futures contracts is the clearinghouse for the exchange on which the relevant contracts are traded. In addition, USO bears the risk of financial failure by the clearing broker.

USO’s cash and other property, such as Treasuries, deposited with an FCM are considered commingled with all other customer funds, subject to the FCM’s segregation requirements. In the event of an FCM’s insolvency, recovery may be limited to a pro rata share of segregated funds available. It is possible that the recovered amount could be less than the total of cash and other property deposited. The insolvency of an FCM could result in the complete loss of USO’s assets posted with that FCM; however, the majority of USO’s assets are held in investments in Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents with USO’s custodian and would not be impacted by the insolvency of an FCM. The failure or insolvency of USO’s custodian, however, could result in a substantial loss of USO’s assets.

USCF invests a portion of USO’s cash in money market funds that seek to maintain a stable per share NAV. USO is exposed to any risk of loss associated with an investment in such money market funds. As of September 30, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, USO held investments in money market funds in the amounts of $250,000,000$90,000,000 and $748,000,001,$52,000,000, respectively. USO also holds cash deposits with its custodian. Pursuant to a written agreement with BBH&Co., uninvested overnight cash balances are swept to offshore branches of U.S. regulated and domiciled banks located in Toronto, Canada; London, United Kingdom; Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands; and Nassau, Bahamas; which are subject to U.S. regulation and regulatory oversight. As of September 30, 20172019 and December 31, 2016,2018, USO held cash deposits and investments in Treasuries in the amounts of $1,956,896,479$1,405,037,213 and $2,422,382,750,$1,604,935,976, respectively, with the custodian and FCM. Some or all of these amounts may be subject to loss should USO’s custodian and/or FCM cease operations.

For derivatives, risks arise from changes in the market value of the contracts. Theoretically, USO is exposed to market risk equal to the value of futures contracts purchased and unlimited liability on such contracts sold short. As both a buyer and a seller of options, USO pays or receives a premium at the outset and then bears the risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the contract underlying the option.

USO’s policy is to continuously monitor its exposure to market and counterparty risk through the use of a variety of financial, position and credit exposure reporting controls and procedures. In addition, USO has a policy of requiring review of the credit standing of each broker or counterparty with which it conducts business.

The financial instruments held by USO are reported in its condensed statements of financial condition at market or fair value, or at carrying amounts that approximate fair value, because of their highly liquid nature and short-term maturity.

13

13

NOTE 6 — FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

The following table presents per share performance data and other supplemental financial data for the nine months ended September 30, 20172019 and 20162018 for the shareholders. This information has been derived from information presented in the condensed financial statements.

    

For the nine months ended

    

For the nine months ended

 

September 30, 2019

September 30, 2018

 

(Unaudited)

(Unaudited)

 

Per Share Operating Performance:

 

  

 

  

Net asset value, beginning of period

$

9.59

$

12.08

Total income (loss)

 

1.76

 

3.46

Total expenses

 

(0.07)

 

(0.07)

Net increase (decrease) in net asset value

 

1.69

 

3.39

Net asset value, end of period

$

11.28

$

15.47

 

 

Total Return

 

17.62

%  

 

28.06

%

 

 

Ratios to Average Net Assets

 

 

Total income (loss)

 

21.52

%  

 

25.82

%

Management fees*

 

0.45

%  

 

0.45

%

Expenses excluding management fees*

 

0.35

%  

 

0.27

%

Net income (loss)

 

20.92

%  

 

25.27

%

  For the nine months ended
September 30, 2017
(Unaudited)
  For the nine months ended
September 30, 2016
(Unaudited)
 
Per Share Operating Performance:        
Net asset value, beginning of period $11.71  $11.02 
Total income (loss)  (1.21)  0.04 
Total expenses  (0.06)  (0.06)
Net increase (decrease) in net asset value  (1.27)  (0.02)
Net asset value, end of period $10.44  $11.00 
         
Total Return  (10.85)%  (0.18)%
         
Ratios to Average Net Assets        
Total income (loss)  (8.25)%  11.69%
Management fees*  0.45%  0.45%
Expenses excluding management fees*  0.29%  0.32%
Net income (loss)  (8.81)%  11.11%

**   Annualized.

Total returns are calculated based on the change in value during the period. An individual shareholder’s total return and ratio may vary from the above total returns and ratios based on the timing of contributions to and withdrawals from USO.

NOTE 7 — FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

USO values its investments in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 820 – Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement. The changes to past practice resulting from the application of ASC 820 relate to the definition of fair value, the methods used to measure fair value, and the expanded disclosures about fair value measurement. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between: (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of USO (observable inputs) and (2) USO’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available under the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The three levels defined by the ASC 820 hierarchy are as follows:

Level I – Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets foridenticalassets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level II – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level I that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level II assets include the following: quoted prices forsimilarassets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market-corroborated inputs).

Level III – Unobservable pricing input at the measurement date for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.

In some instances, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall within different levels of the fair value hierarchy. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest input level that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

14

14

The following table summarizes the valuation of USO’s securities at September 30, 20172019 using the fair value hierarchy:

At September 30, 2019

    

Total

    

Level I

    

Level II

    

Level III

Short-Term Investments

$

1,358,772,491

$

1,358,772,491

$

$

Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

United States Contracts

 

(66,680,740)

 

(66,680,740)

 

 

At September 30, 2017 Total  Level I  Level II  Level III 
Short-Term Investments $2,194,620,078  $2,194,620,078  $  $ 
Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts                
United States Contracts  122,542,660   122,542,660       

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, there were no0 transfers between Level I and Level II.

The following table summarizes the valuation of USO’s securities at December 31, 20162018 using the fair value hierarchy:

At December 31, 2018

    

Total

    

Level I

    

Level II

    

Level III

Short-Term Investments

$

1,334,416,220

$

1,334,416,220

$

$

Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts

 

 

 

  

 

  

United States Contracts

 

(194,392,958)

 

(194,392,958)

 

 

At December 31, 2016 Total  Level I  Level II  Level III 
Short-Term Investments $2,770,212,015  $2,770,212,015  $  $ 
Exchange-Traded Futures Contracts                
United States Contracts  111,290,560   111,290,560       

During the year ended December 31, 2016,2018, there were no0 transfers between Level I and Level II.

Effective January 1, 2009, USO adopted the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification 815 — Derivatives and Hedging, which require presentation of qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts and gains and losses on derivatives.

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

Derivatives not

Condensed

Accounted for

Statements of

Fair Value

Fair Value

as Hedging

Financial

At September 30, 

At December 31, 

Instruments

    

Condition Location

    

2019

    

2018

Futures - Commodity Contracts

 

Assets

$

(66,680,740)

$

(194,392,958)

Derivatives not
Accounted for
as Hedging
Instruments
 Condensed
Statements of
Financial
Condition Location
 Fair Value
At September 30,
2017
  Fair Value
At December 31,
2016
 
Futures - Commodity Contracts Assets $122,542,660  $111,290,560 

The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Condensed Statements of Operations

For the nine months ended

For the nine months ended

September 30, 2019

September 30, 2018

Change in

Change in

Location of

Realized

Unrealized

Realized

Unrealized

Derivatives not

Gain (Loss)

Gain (Loss)

Gain (Loss) on

Gain (Loss)

Gain (Loss) on

Accounted for

on Derivatives

on Derivatives

Derivatives

on Derivatives

Derivatives

as Hedging

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Recognized in

Instruments

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

    

Income

Futures - Commodity Contracts

 

Realized gain (loss) on closed positions

$

166,752,646

$

451,011,820

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on open positions

 

  

$

127,712,218

 

  

$

8,329,350

    For the nine months ended
September 30, 2017
  For the nine months ended
September 30, 2016
 
Derivatives not
Accounted for
as Hedging
Instruments
 Location of
Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives
Recognized in
Income
 Realized
Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives
Recognized in
Income
  Change in
Unrealized
Gain (Loss) on
Derivatives
Recognized in
Income
  Realized
Gain (Loss)
on Derivatives
Recognized in
Income
  Change in
Unrealized
Gain (Loss) on
Derivatives
Recognized in
Income
 
Futures - Commodity Contracts Realized gain (loss) on
closed futures contracts
 $(257,378,501)     $119,714,110     
                   
  Change in unrealized
gain (loss) on open
contracts
     $11,252,100      $270,039,300 

NOTE 8 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

USO has performed an evaluation of subsequent events through the date the condensed financial statements were issued. This evaluation did not result in any subsequent events that necessitated disclosures and/or adjustments.

15

15

Item 2.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed financial statements and the notes thereto of the United States Oil Fund, LP (“USO”) included elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Forward-Looking Information

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q, including this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contains forward-looking statements regarding the plans and objectives of management for future operations. This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause USO’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions and describe USO’s future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend” or “project,” the negative of these words, other variations on these words or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that may be incorrect, and USO cannot assure investors that the projections included in these forward-looking statements will come to pass. USO’s actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors.

USO has based the forward-looking statements included in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q on information available to it on the date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, and USO assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Although USO undertakes no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, investors are advised to consult any additional disclosures that USO may make directly to them or through reports that USO files in the future files with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.

Introduction

USO, a Delaware limited partnership, is a commodity pool that issues shares that may be purchased and sold on the NYSE Arca, Inc. (the “NYSE Arca”). The investment objective of USO is for the daily changes in percentage terms of its shares’ per share net asset value (“NAV”) to reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of the spot price of light, sweet crude oil delivered to Cushing, Oklahoma, as measured by the daily changes in the price of a specified short-termthe futures contract onfor light, sweet crude oil traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange (the “NYMEX”) that is the near month contract to expire, except when the near month contract is within two weeks of expiration, in which case it will be measured by the futures contract that is the next month contract to expire (the “Benchmark Oil Futures Contract”), plus interest earned on USO’s collateral holdings, less USO’s expenses. “Near month contract” means the next contract traded on the NYMEX due to expire. “Next month contract” means the first contract traded on the NYMEX due to expire after the near month contract.

USO’s investment objective isnotfor its NAV or market price of shares to equal, in dollar terms, the spot price of light, sweet crude oil or any particular futures contract based on light, sweet crude oil,nor is USO’s investment objective for the percentage change in its NAV to reflect the percentage change of the price of any particular futures contract as measured over a time periodgreater than one day. The general partner of USO, United States Commodity Funds LLC (“USCF”), believes that it is not practical to manage the portfolio to achieve such an investment goal when investing in Oil Futures Contracts (as defined below) and Other Oil-Related Investments (as defined below).

USO invests primarily in futures contracts for light, sweet crude oil, other types of crude oil, heating oil, gasoline, natural gas and other petroleum-based fuels that are traded on the NYMEX, ICE Futures or other U.S. and foreign exchanges (collectively, “Oil Futures Contracts”) and to a lesser extent, in order to comply with regulatory requirements or in view of market conditions, other oil-related investments such as cash-settled options on Oil Futures Contracts, forward contracts for oil, cleared swap contracts and over-the-counter (“OTC”) swaps that are based on the price of oil, other petroleum-based fuels, Oil Futures Contracts and indices based on the foregoing (collectively, “Other Oil-Related Investments”). For convenience and unless otherwise specified, Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments collectively are referred to as “Oil Interests” in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

16

16

USCF believes that market arbitrage opportunities will cause daily changes in USO’s share price on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis to closely track daily changes in USO’s per share NAV on a percentage basis. USCF further believes that daily changes in prices of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract have historically closely tracked the daily changes in spot prices of light, sweet crude oil. USCF believes that the net effect of these relationships will be that the daily changes in the price of USO’s shares on the NYSE Arca on a percentage basis will closely track the daily changes in the spot price of a barrel of light, sweet crude oil on a percentage basis, plus interest earned on USO’s collateral holdings, less USO’s expenses.

USO seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing so that the average daily percentage change in USO’s NAV for any period of 30 successive valuation days will be within plus/minus ten percent (10%) of the average daily percentage change in the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract over the same period.

Regulatory Disclosure

Accountability Levels, Position Limits and Price Fluctuation Limits. Designated contract markets (“DCMs”), such as the NYMEX and ICE Futures, have established accountability levels and position limits on the maximum net long or net short futures contracts in commodity interests that any person or group of persons under common trading control (other than as a hedge, which an investment by USO is not) may hold, own or control. These levels and position limits apply to the futures contracts that USO invests in to meet its investment objective. In addition to accountability levels and position limits, the NYMEX and ICE Futures also set daily price fluctuation limits on futures contracts. The daily price fluctuation limit establishes the maximum amount that the price of a futures contract may vary either up or down from the previous day’s settlement price. Once the daily price fluctuation limit has been reached in a particular futures contract, no trades may be made at a price beyond that limit.

The accountability levels for the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract and other Oil Futures Contracts traded on U.S.-based futures exchanges, such as the NYMEX, are not a fixed ceiling, but rather a threshold above which the NYMEX may exercise greater scrutiny and control over an investor’s positions. The current accountability level for investments for any one month in the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract is 10,000 contracts. In addition, the NYMEX imposes an accountability level for all months of 20,000 net futures contracts for light, sweet crude oil. In addition, the ICE Futures maintains the same accountability levels, position limits and monitoring authority for its light, sweet crude oil contract as the NYMEX. If USO and the Related Public Funds exceed these accountability levels for investments in the futures contracts for light, sweet crude oil, the NYMEX and ICE Futures will monitor such exposure and may ask for further information on their activities including the total size of all positions, investment and trading strategy, and the extent of liquidity resources of USO and the Related Public Funds. If deemed necessary by the NYMEX and/or ICE Futures, USO could be ordered to reduce its Crude Oil Futures CL contracts to below the 10,000 single month and/or 20,000 all month accountability level. As of September 30, 2017,2019, USO held 44,68225,597 NYMEX WTI Crude Oil Futures CL contracts and did not hold ICE WTI Crude Oil Futures Contracts.contracts. USO exceeded accountability levels of the NYMEX during the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019 when it held a maximum of 71,15533,818 Crude Oil Futures CL contracts.contracts, on the NYMEX, exceeding the “any” month limit. No action was taken by the NYMEX and USO did not reduce the number of Crude Oil Futures Contracts held as a result. USO did not exceed accountability levels imposed by the ICE Futures during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

2019.

Position limits differ from accountability levels in that they represent fixed limits on the maximum number of futures contracts that any person may hold and cannot allow such limits to be exceeded without express CFTC authority to do so. In addition to accountability levels and position limits that may apply at any time, the NYMEX and ICE Futures impose position limits on contracts held in the last few days of trading in the near month contract to expire. It is unlikely that USO will run up against such position limits because USO’s investment strategy is to close out its positions and “roll” from the near month contract to expire to the next month contract during a four-day period beginning two weeks from expiration of the contract. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, USO did not exceed any position limits imposed by the NYMEX and ICE Futures.

The regulation of commodity interest trading in the United States and other countries is an evolving area of the law. The various statements made in this summary are subject to modification by legislative action and changes in the rules and regulations of the SEC, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), CFTC, the National Futures Association (the “NFA”),NFA, the futures exchanges, clearing organizations and other regulatory bodies.

17

Futures Contracts and Position Limits

The CFTC is generally prohibited by statute from regulating trading on non-U.S. futures exchanges and markets. The CFTC, however, has adopted regulations relating to the marketing of non-U.S. futures contracts in the United States. These regulations permit certain contracts on non-U.S. exchanges to be offered and sold in the United States.

17

The CFTC has proposed to adopt limits on speculative positions in 25 physical commodity futures and option contracts as well as swaps that are economically equivalent to such contracts in the agriculture, energy and metals markets (the “Position Limit Rules”). The Position Limit Rules would, among other things: identify which contracts are subject to speculative position limits; set thresholds that restrict the size of speculative positions that a person may hold in the spot month, other individual months, and all months combined; create an exemption for positions that constitute bona fide hedging transactions; impose responsibilities on designated contract markets (“DCMs”)DCMs and swap execution facilities (“SEFs”) to establish position limits or, in some cases, position accountability rules; and apply to both futures and swaps across four relevant venues: OTC, DCMs, SEFs as well as certain non-U.S. located platforms. The CFTC’s first attempt at finalizing the Position Limit Rules, in 2011, was successfully challenged by market participants in 2012 and, since then, the CFTC has re-proposed them and solicited comments from market participants multiple times. At this time, it is unclear how the Position Limit Rules may affect USO, but the effect may be substantial and adverse. By way of example, the Position Limit Rules may negatively impact the ability of USO to meet its investment objectives through limits that may inhibit USCF’s ability to sell additional Creation Baskets of USO.

Until such time as the Position Limit Rules are adopted, the regulatory architecture in effect prior to the adoption of the Position Limit Rules will govern transactions in commodities and related derivatives (collectively, “Referenced Contracts”).derivatives. Under that system, the CFTC enforces federal limits on speculation in nine agricultural products (e.g., corn, wheat and soy), while futures exchanges establish and enforce position limits and accountability levels for other agricultural products and certain energy products (e.g., oil and natural gas). As a result, USO may be limited with respect to the size of its investments in any commodities subject to these limits.

Under existing and recently adopted CFTC regulations, for the purpose of position limits, a market participant is generally required, subject to certain narrow exceptions, to aggregate all positions for which that participant controls the trading decisions with all positions for which thethat participant has a 10 percent or greater ownership interest in an account or position, as well as the positions of two or more persons acting pursuant to an express or implied agreement or understanding with that participant (the “Aggregation Rules”). The Aggregation Rules will also apply with respect to the Position Limit Rules if and when such Position Limit Rules are adopted.

OTC Swaps

“Swap” TransactionsIn October 2015, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the FDIC, the Farm Credit Administration, and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (each an “Agency” and, collectively, the “Agencies”) jointly adopted final rules to establish minimum margin and capital requirements for registered swap dealers, major swap participants, security-based swap dealers, and major security-based swap participants (“Swap Entities”) that are subject to the jurisdiction of one of the Agencies (such entities, “Covered Swap Entities”, and the joint final rules, the “Final Margin Rules”).

The Final Margin Rules will subject non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps between Covered Swap Entities and Swap Entities, and between Covered Swap Entities and financial end users that have material swaps exposure (i.e., an average daily aggregate notional of $8 billion or more in non-cleared swaps calculated in accordance with the Final Margin Rules), to a mandatory two-way minimum initial margin requirement. The minimum amount of the initial margin required to be posted or collected would be either the amount calculated by the Covered Swap Entity using a standardized schedule set forth as an appendix to the Final Margin Rules, which provides the gross initial margin (as a percentage of total notional exposure) for certain asset classes, or an internal margin model of the Covered Swap Entity conforming to the requirements of the Final Margin Rules that is approved by the Agency having jurisdiction over the particular Covered Swap Entity. The Final Margin Rules specify the types of collateral that may be posted or collected as initial margin for non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps with financial end users (generally cash, certain government, government-sponsored enterprise securities, certain liquid debt, certain equity securities, certain eligible publicly traded debt, and gold); and sets forth haircuts for certain collateral asset classes.

18

The Final Margin Rules require minimum variation margin to be exchanged daily for non-cleared swaps and non-cleared security-based swaps between Covered Swap Entities and Swap Entities and between Covered Swap Entities and all financial end-users (without regard to the swaps exposure of the particular financial end-user). The minimum variation margin amount is the daily mark-to-market change in the value of the swap to the Covered Swap Entity, taking into account variation margin previously posted or collected. For non-cleared swaps and security-based swaps between Covered Swap Entities and financial end-users, variation margin may be posted or collected in cash or non-cash collateral that is considered eligible for initial margin purposes. Variation margin is not subject to segregation with an independent, third-party custodian, and may, if permitted by contract, be rehypothecated.

The initial margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules are being phased in over time, and the variation margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules are currently in effect. The Fund is not a Covered Swap Entity under the Final Margin Rules, but it is a financial end-user. Accordingly, the Fund is currently subject to the variation margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules. However, the Fund does not have material swaps exposure and, accordingly, the Fund will not be subject to the initial margin requirements of the Final Margin Rules.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) imposes regulatory requirementsrequired the CFTC and the SEC to adopt their own margin rules to apply to a limited number of registered swap dealers, security-based swap dealers, major swap participants, and major security-based swap participants that are not subject to the jurisdiction of one of the Agencies. On December 16, 2015 the CFTC finalized its margin rules, which are substantially the same as the Final Margin Rules and have the same implementation timeline. The SEC adopted margin rules for security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap participants on certain “swap” transactions thatJune 21, 2019. The SEC’s margin rules are generally aligned with the Final Margin Rules and the CFTC’s margin rules, but they differ in a few key respects relating to timing for compliance and the manner in which initial margin must be segregated. USO is authorized todoes not currently engage in that may ultimately impactsecurity-based swap transactions and, therefore, the abilitySEC’s margin rules are not expected to apply to USO.

Mandatory Trading and Clearing of USO to meet its investment objective. The term “swap” is broadly defined to include various types of OTC derivatives, including swaps and options.

Swaps

CFTC regulations require that certain swap transactions ultimately falling within the definition of “swap” be executed on organized exchanges or “swap execution facilities” and cleared through regulated clearing organizations (“CCPs”derivative clearing organizations” (“DCOs”). “Clearing” refers), if the CFTC mandates the central clearing of a particular class of swap and such swap is “made available to the process by whichtrade” on a tradeswap execution facility. Currently, swap dealers, major swap participants, commodity pools, certain private funds and entities predominantly engaged in activities that are financial in nature are required to execute on a swap execution facility, and clear, certain interest rate swaps and index-based credit default swaps. As a result, if USO enters into an interest rate or index-based credit default swap that is bilaterallysubject to these requirements, such swap will be required to be executed by two parties is submittedon a swap execution facility and centrally cleared. Mandatory clearing and “made available to a CCP, via a clearing member (i.e., an “FCM”), and replaced by two mirrortrade” determinations with respect to additional types of swaps with the CCP becoming the counterparty to both of the initial parties to the swap. CCPs have several layers of protection against default including margin, member capital contributions and FCM guarantees of their customers’ transactions with the CCP. FCMs also pre-qualify the counterparties to all swaps that are sent to the CCP from a credit perspective, setting limits for each counterparty and collecting initial and variation margin daily from each counterparty for changesexpected in the value offuture, and, when finalized, could require USO to electronically execute and centrally clear certain OTC instruments presently entered into and settled on a bi-lateral basis. If a swap is required to be cleared, swaps. The margin collected from both parties to the swap protects against credit risk in the event a counterparty defaults. The initial and variation margin requirements are set by the relevant clearing organization, subject to certain regulatory requirements and held for the benefit of the CCP.guidelines. Additional initial margin may be required and held by theUSO’s FCM.

Other Requirements for Swaps

Current rules and regulations require enhanced customer protections, risk management programs, internal monitoring and controls, capital and liquidity standards, customer disclosures and auditing and examination programs for FCMs. The rules are intended to afford greater assurances to market participants that customer segregated funds and secured amounts are protected, customers are provided with appropriate notice of the risks of futures trading and of the FCMs with which they may choose to do business, FCMs are monitoring and managing risks in a robust manner, the capital and liquidity of FCMs are strengthened to safeguard the continued operations and the auditing and examination programs of the CFTC and the self-regulatory organizations are monitoring the activities of FCMs in a thorough manner.

Certain index-based credit default swaps and interest rate swaps are subject to mandatory clearing. If USO enters into index-based credit default swaps or interest rate swaps that are subject to mandatory clearing, USO will be required to centrally clear those swaps.

18

To the extent that a swap is required to be cleared, it must also be executed on a SEF or DCM if it is designated as “made available to trade” by a SEF or DCM. “Made available to trade” refersIn addition to the regulatory process by which the SEF or DCM execution requirement is implemented by the CFTC. To date, only certain of the index-based credit defaultmargin requirements described above, swaps and interest rate swaps that are required to be cleared are made available to trade on a SEF. If USO enters into index-based credit default swaps or interest rate swaps that are subject to mandatory clearing, USO will be required to execute those swaps on a SEF if they are designated as made available to trade. In order to execute swaps on a SEF, USO will have to be a member of a SEF or it may access the SEF through an intermediary. Members of a SEF are subject to additional requirements under CFTC regulations and are subject to the rules and jurisdiction of the relevant SEF.

Swaps that are not required to be cleared and executed on a SEF but that are executed bilaterally are also subject to various requirements pursuant to CFTC regulations, including, among others,other things, reporting and recordkeeping requirements and, depending on the status of the counterparties, trading documentation requirements and dispute resolution requirements. In addition, U.S. regulators have adopted rules to impose initial and variation margin requirements that will apply to swap dealers and major swap participants and their counterparties. If USO engages in non-cleared swap transactions it will be subject to some or all of the requirements of the margin rules, which include a requirement that swap dealers and major swap participants collect variation margin daily, beginning in March 2017, and potentially initial margin, beginning in September 2020.

Derivatives Regulations in Non-U.S. Jurisdictions

In addition to U.S. laws and regulations, USO may be subject to non-U.S. derivatives laws and regulations if it engages in futures and/or swapsswap transactions with non-U.S. persons. For example, USO may be impacted by European laws and regulations to the extent that it engages in futures transactions on European exchanges or derivatives transactions with European entities. Other jurisdictions impose requirements applicable to futures and derivatives that are similar to those imposed by the U.S., including position limits, margin, clearing and trade execution requirements.

19

Money Market Reform

Funds

The SEC adopted amendments to Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended ("1940 Act") which became effective in 2016, to reform money market funds (“MMFs”). While the new rule applies only to MMFs, it may indirectly affect institutional investors such as USO. A portion of USO’s assets that are not used for margin or collateral in the Futures Contracts currently are invested in government MMFs. USO does not hold any non-government MMFs and particularly in light of recent changes to the rule governing the operation of MMFs, does not anticipate investing in any non-government MMFs. However, if USO invests in other types of MMFs besides government MMFs in the future, USO could be negatively impacted by investing in an MMF that does not maintain a stable $1.00 net asset valueNAV or that has the potential to impose redemption fees and gates (temporary suspension of redemptions).

Although such government money market funds seek to preserve the value of an investment at $1.00 per share, there is no guarantee that they will be able to do so and USO may lose money by investing in a government money market fund. An investment in a government money market fund is not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, referred to herein as the FDIC, or any other government agency. The share price of a government money market fund can fall below the $1.00 share price. USO cannot rely on or expect a government money market fund’s adviser or its affiliates to enter into support agreements or take other actions to maintain the government money market fund’s $1.00 share price. The credit quality of a government money market fund’s holdings can change rapidly in certain markets, and the default of a single holding could have an adverse impact on the government money market fund’s share price. Due to fluctuations in interest rates, the market value of securities held by a government money market fund may vary. A government money market fund’s share price can also be negatively affected during periods of high redemption pressures and/or illiquid markets.

Price Movements

Crude oil futures prices were volatile during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.2019. The price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract started the period at $53.720$45.41 per barrel. It hit a peakThe high of the period was on FebruaryApril 23, 2017 at a2019 when the price of $54.450reached $66.30 per barrel. The low of the period was on June 21, 2017 when the starting price dropped to $42.530for the period which was $45.41 per barrel. The period ended with the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract at $51.670$54.07 per barrel, downan increase of approximately (3.82)%19.07% over the period. USO’s per share NAV began the period at $11.71$9.59 and ended the period at $10.44$11.28 on September 30, 2017, a decrease2019, an increase of approximately (10.85)%17.62% over the period. USO’s per share NAV reached its high for the period on January 6, 2017April 23, 2019 at $11.76$13.79 and reached its low for the period on June 21, 2017was at $8.74.the beginning of the period when it was $9.59. The Benchmark Oil Futures Contract prices listed above began with the February 20172019 contracts and ended with the November 20172019 contracts. The decreaseincrease of approximately (3.82)%19.07% on the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract listed above is a hypothetical return only and could not actually be achieved by an investor holding Oil Futures Contracts. An investment in Oil Futures Contracts would need to be rolled forward during the time period described in order to simulate such a result. Furthermore, the change in the nominal price of these differing crude Oil Futures Contracts, measured from the start of the period to the end of the period, does not represent the actual benchmark results that USO seeks to track, which are more fully described below in the section titled “Tracking USO’s Benchmark.USO's Benchmark.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, the crude oil futures market was states of both contango and backwardation. On days when the market is in a state of contango meaning that the price of the near month crude Oil Futures Contract wasis lower than the price of the next month crude Oil Futures Contract, andor contracts further away from expiration. (OnOn days when the market is in backwardation, the price of the near month crude Oil Futures Contract is typically higher than the price of the next month crude Oil Futures Contract or contracts further away from expiration.) For a discussion of the impact of backwardation and contango on total returns, see“Term Structure of Crude Oil Prices and the Impact on Total Returns” below.

19

Valuation of Oil Futures Contracts and the Computation of the Per Share NAV

The per share NAV of USO’s shares is calculated once each NYSE Arca trading day. The per share NAV for a particular trading day is released after 4:00 p.m. New York time. Trading during the core trading session on the NYSE Arca typically closes at 4:00 p.m. New York time. USO’s administrator uses the NYMEX closing price (determined at the earlier of the close of the NYMEX or 2:30 p.m. New York time) for the contracts held on the NYMEX, but calculates or determines the value of all other USO investments, including ICE Futures contracts or other futures contracts, as of the earlier of the close of the NYSE Arca or 4:00 p.m. New York time.

20

Results of Operations and the Crude Oil Market

Results of Operations. On April 10, 2006, USO listed its shares on the American Stock Exchange (the “AMEX”) under the ticker symbol “USO.” On that day, USO established its initial offering price at $67.39 per share and issued 200,000 shares to the initial Authorized Participant in exchange for $13,479,000 in cash. As a result of the acquisition of the AMEX by NYSE Euronext, USO’s shares ceased trading on the AMEX and commenced trading on the NYSE Arca on November 25, 2008.

Since its initial offering of 17,000,000 shares, USO has registered nine subsequent offerings of its shares: 30,000,000 shares which were registered with the SEC on October 18, 2006, 50,000,000 shares which were registered with the SEC on January 30, 2007, 30,000,000 shares which were registered with the SEC on December 4, 2007, 100,000,000 shares which were registered with the SEC on February 7, 2008, 100,000,000 shares which were registered with the SEC on September 29, 2008, 300,000,000 shares which were registered with the SEC on January 16, 2009, 1,000,000,000 shares which were registered with the SEC on June 29, 2009, 500,000,000 shares which were registered with the SEC on April 28, 2015, and 1,000,000,000 shares which were registered with the SEC on February 29, 2016.2016, and 100,000,000 shares which were registered with the SEC on February 27, 2019. Shares offered by USO in the subsequent offerings were sold for cash at the per share NAV as described in the applicable prospectus. As of September 30, 2017,2019, USO had issued 2,469,200,0003,067,100,000 shares, 221,100,000122,700,000 of which were outstanding. As of September 30, 2017,2019, there were 657,800,000159,900,000 shares registered but not yet issued.

More shares may have been issued by USO than are outstanding due to the redemption of shares. Unlike funds that are registered under the Investment Company1940 Act, of 1940, as amended, shares that have been redeemed by USO cannot be resold by USO. As a result, USO contemplates that additional offerings of its shares will be registered with the SEC in the future in anticipation of additional issuances and redemptions.

As of September 30, 2017,2019, USO had the following Authorized Participants: ABN Amro, BNP Paribas Prime Brokerage Inc., BNP Paribas Securities Corp., Citadel Securities LLC, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Credit Suisse Securities USA LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., Goldman Sachs & Company, Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing LP, JP Morgan Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp., Morgan Stanley & Company Inc., Nomura Securities International Inc., RBC Capital Markets LLC, SG Americas Securities LLC, UBS Securities LLC and Virtu Financial BD LLC and Wedbush Securities Inc.LLC.

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 20172019 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 20162018

    

For the nine

    

For the nine

 

months ended

 

months ended

 

September 30, 2019

 

September 30, 2018

Average daily total net assets

$

1,491,538,308

$

1,869,918,361

Dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents

$

26,245,424

$

23,125,359

Annualized yield based on average daily total net assets

 

2.35

%  

 

1.65

%

Management fee

$

5,020,150

$

6,293,684

Total fees and other expenses excluding management fees

$

3,859,150

$

3,835,865

Fees and expenses related to the registration or offering of additional shares

$

429,819

$

93,326

Total commissions accrued to brokers

$

1,895,834

$

1,916,737

Total commissions as annualized percentage of average total net assets

 

0.17

%  

 

0.14

%

Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing

$

1,602,426

$

1,651,071

Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing

 

84.52

%  

 

86.14

%

Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity

$

293,408

$

265,666

Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity

 

15.48

%  

 

13.86

%

Portfolio Expenses. USO’s expenses consist of investment management fees, brokerage fees and commissions, certain offering costs, licensing fees, registration fees, the fees and expenses of the independent directors of USCF and expenses relating to tax accounting and reporting requirements. The management fee that USO pays to USCF is calculated as a percentage of the total net assets of USO. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.

  For the nine
months ended
September 30, 2017
  For the nine
months ended
September 30, 2016
 
Average daily total net assets $2,793,415,494  $3,402,607,890 
Dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents $15,283,923  $7,850,978 
Annualized approximate yield based on average daily total net assets  0.73%  0.31%
Management fee $9,401,948  $11,462,884 
Total fees and other expenses excluding management fees $6,142,148  $8,278,476 
Fees and expenses related to the registration or offering of additional shares $260,603  $252,159 
Total commissions accrued to brokers $3,775,114  $5,376,805 
Total commissions as annualized percentage of average total net assets  0.18%  0.21%
Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing $3,311,727  $4,920,092 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing  87.73%  91.51%
Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity $463,387  $456,713 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity  12.27%  8.49%

Average interest rates earned on short-term investments held by USO, including cash, cash equivalents and Treasuries, were higher during the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018. As a result, the amount of income earned by USO as a percentage of average daily total net assets was higher during the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

The increase in total fees and other expenses excluding management fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was due primarily to an increase in expenses related to the registration or offering of additional shares.

The decrease in total commissions accrued to brokers for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018, was due primarily to a lower number of Oil Futures Contracts being held and traded.

21

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2019 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2018

    

For the three

    

For the three

 

months ended

 

months ended

 

September 30, 2019

 

September 30, 2018

Average daily total net assets

$

1,366,720,567

$

1,749,990,810

Dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents

$

7,729,989

$

8,711,764

Annualized yield based on average daily total net assets

 

2.24

%  

 

1.98

%

Management fee

$

1,550,198

$

1,984,921

Total fees and other expenses excluding management fees

$

1,227,049

$

1,132,383

Fees and expenses related to the registration or offering of additional shares

$

151,791

$

5,963

Total commissions accrued to brokers

$

616,021

$

570,108

Total commissions as annualized percentage of average total net assets

 

0.18

%  

 

0.13

%

Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing

$

489,127

$

499,645

Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing

 

79.40

%  

 

87.64

%

Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity

$

126,894

$

70,463

Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity

 

20.60

%  

 

12.36

%

Portfolio Expenses. USO’s expenses consist of investment management fees, brokerage fees and commissions, certain offering costs, licensing fees, registration fees, the fees and expenses of the independent directors of USCF and expenses relating to tax accounting and reporting requirements. The management fee that USO pays to USCF is calculated as a percentage of the total net assets of USO. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.

20

Average interest rates earned on short-term investments held by USO, including cash, cash equivalents and Treasuries, were higher during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016. As a result, the amount of income earned by USO as a percentage of average daily total net assets was higher during the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

The decrease in total fees and expenses excluding management fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016, was due to USO’s smaller size as measured by total net assets.

The decrease in the total commissions accrued to brokers by USO for the nine months ended September 30, 2017, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016, was due primarily to a lower number of futures contracts being held and traded as a result of USO’s smaller size in terms of average net assets.

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

  For the three
months ended
September 30, 2017
  For the three
months ended
September 30, 2016
 
Average daily total net assets $2,595,418,451  $3,199,636,635 
Dividend and interest income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents $6,353,944  $2,861,314 
Annualized approximate yield based on average daily total net assets  0.97%  0.36%
Management fee $2,943,845  $3,619,261 
Total fees and other expenses excluding management fees $1,861,487  $2,491,904 
Fees and expenses related to the registration or offering of additional shares $87,822  $87,823 
Total commissions accrued to brokers $1,248,593  $1,544,097 
Total commissions as annualized percentage of average total net assets  0.19%  0.19%
Commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing $1,073,724  $1,415,711 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of rebalancing  85.99%  91.69%
Commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity $174,869  $128,386 
Percentage of commissions accrued as a result of creation and redemption activity  14.01%  8.31%

Portfolio Expenses. USO’s expenses consist of investment management fees, brokerage fees and commissions, certain offering costs, licensing fees, registration fees, the fees and expenses of the independent directors of USCF and expenses relating to tax accounting and reporting requirements. The management fee that USO pays to USCF is calculated as a percentage of the total net assets of USO. The fee is accrued daily and paid monthly.

Average interest rates earned on short-term investments held by USO, including cash, cash equivalents and Treasuries, were higher during the three months ended September 30, 2017,2019, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016. As2018. However, the average daily net assets for the three months ended September 30, 2019 were lower than the prior year three month period which resulted in a result, thelower amount of income earned by USO as a percentage of average daily total net assets was higher during the three months ended September 30, 2017,2019, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016.

2018.

The decreaseincrease in total fees and other expenses excluding management fees for the three months ended September 30, 2017,2019, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016,2018 was due primarily to USO’s smallerlarger size as measured by total net assets.

The decreaseincrease in the total commissions accrued to brokers by USO for the three months ended September 30, 2017, as2019, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2016,2018, was due primarily to a lowerhigher number of futures contractsOil Futures Contracts being held and traded as a result of USO’s smaller size in terms of average net assets.

21

traded.

Tracking USO’s Benchmark

USCF seeks to manage USO’s portfolio such that changes in its average daily per share NAV, on a percentage basis, closely track the daily changes in the average price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, also on a percentage basis. Specifically, USCF seeks to manage the portfolio such that over any rolling period of 30-valuation days, the average daily change in USO’s per share NAV is within a range of 90% to 110% (0.9 to 1.1) of the average daily change in the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract. As an example, if the average daily movement of the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract for a particular 30-valuation day time period was 0.50% per day, USCF would attempt to manage the portfolio such that the average daily movement of the per share NAV during that same time period fell between 0.45% and 0.55% (i.e.(i.e., between 0.9 and 1.1 of the benchmark’s results). USO’s portfolio management goals do not include trying to make the nominal price of USO’s per share NAV equal to the nominal price of the current Benchmark Oil Futures Contract or the spot price for light, sweet crude oil. USCF believes that it is not practical to manage the portfolio to achieve such an investment goal when investing in Oil Futures Contracts and otherOther Oil-Related Investments.

22

For the 30-valuation days ended September 30, 2017,2019, the simple average daily change in the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract was 0.2771%0.013%, while the simple average daily change in the per share NAV of USO over the same time period was 0.2787%0.021%. The average daily difference was 0.0016%0.008% (or 0.160.8 basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, the average error in daily tracking by the per share NAV was 1.8306%5.514%, meaning that over this time period USO’s tracking error was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal. A significant portion of the level of USO’sUSO's relative tracking error as a percentage of the benchmark was due to periods of flat price returns.

Since the commencement of the offering of USO’s shares to the public on April 10, 2006 to September 30, 2017,2019, the simple average daily change in the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract was (0.0385)(0.028)%, while the simple average daily change in the per share NAV of USO over the same time period was (0.0387)(0.028)%. The average daily difference was (0.0002)%0.000% (or (0.02)0.0 basis points, where 1 basis point equals 1/100 of 1%). As a percentage of the daily movement of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, the average error in daily tracking by the per share NAV was 0.0803%0.331%, meaning that over this time period USO’s tracking error was within the plus or minus 10% range established as its benchmark tracking goal. The following two graphs demonstrate the correlation between the changes in USO’s NAV and the changes in the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract. The first graph exhibits the daily changes in the last 30 valuation days ended September 30, 2017.2019. The second graph measures monthly changes since September 30, 20122014 through September 30, 2017.2019.

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Graphic

22

23

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Graphic

An alternative tracking measurement of the return performance of USO versus the return of its Benchmark Oil Futures Contract can be calculated by comparing the actual return of USO, measured by changes in its per share NAV, versus the expected changes in its per share NAV under the assumption that USO’s returns had been exactly the same as the daily changes in its Benchmark Oil Futures Contract.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, the actual total return of USO as measured by changes in its per share NAV was (10.85)%17.62%. This is based on an initial per share NAV of $11.71$9.59 as of December 31, 20162018 and an ending per share NAV as of September 30, 20172019 of $10.44.$11.28. During this time period, USO made no distributions to its shareholders. However, if USO’s daily changes in its per share NAV had instead exactly tracked the changes in the daily total return of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, USO would have had an estimated per share NAV of $10.44$11.15 as of September 30, 2017,2019, for a total return over the relevant time period of (10.85)%16.27%. There was noThe difference between the actual per share NAV total return of USO of (10.85)%17.62% and the expected total return based on the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract of (10.85)%16.27% was an error over the time period of 1.35%, which is to say that USO’s actual total return performed exactly the same as theoutperformed its benchmark result.by that percentage. USO incurs expenses primarily composed of the management fee, brokerage commissions for the buying and selling of futures contracts, and other expenses. The impact of these expenses, offset by interest and dividend income, and net of positive or negative execution, tends to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of USO to track differentlyslightly lower or higher than daily changes in the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract.

By comparison, for the nine months ended September 30, 2016,2018, the actual total return of USO as measured by changes in its per share NAV was (0.18)%28.06%. This was based on an initial per share NAV of $11.02$12.08 as of December 31, 20152017 and an ending per share NAV as of September 30, 20162018 of $11.00.$15.47. During this time period, USO made no distributions to its shareholders. However, if USO’s daily changes in its per share NAV had instead exactly tracked the changes in the daily total return of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, USO would have had an estimated per share NAV of $11.04$15.36 as of September 30, 2016,2018, for a total return over the relevant time period of 0.18%27.15%. The difference between the actual per share NAV total return of USO of (0.18)%28.06% and the expected total return based on the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract of 0.18%27.15% was an error over the time period of 0.36%0.91%, which is to say that USO’s actual total return underperformed theoutperformed its benchmark result by that percentage. USO incurred expenses primarily composed of the management fee, brokerage commissions for the buying and selling of futures contracts, and other expenses. The impact of these expenses, offset by interest and dividend income, and net of positive or negative execution, tended to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of USO to track slightly lower or higher than daily changes in the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract.

24

There are currently three factors that have impacted or are most likely to impact USO’s ability to accurately track its Benchmark Oil Futures Contract.

23

First, USO may buy or sell its holdings in the then current Benchmark Oil Futures Contract at a price other than the closing settlement price of that contract on the day during which USO executes the trade. In that case, USO may pay a price that is higher, or lower, than that of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract, which could cause the changes in the daily per share NAV of USO to either be too high or too low relative to the daily changes in the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, USCF attempted to minimize the effect of these transactions by seeking to execute its purchase or sale of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract at, or as close as possible to, the end of the day settlement price. However, it may not always be possible for USO to obtain the closing settlement price and there is no assurance that failure to obtain the closing settlement price in the future will not adversely impact USO’s attempt to track the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract over time.

Contract.

Second, USO incurs expenses primarily composed of the management fee, brokerage commissions for the buying and selling of futures contracts, and other expenses. The impact of these expenses tends to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of USO to track slightly lower than daily changes in the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract. At the same time, USO earns dividend and interest income on its cash, cash equivalents and Treasuries. USO is not required to distribute any portion of its income to its shareholders and did not make any distributions to shareholders during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.2019. Interest payments, and any other income, were retained within the portfolio and added to USO’sUSO's NAV. When this income exceeds the level of USO’sUSO's expenses for its management fee, brokerage commissions and other expenses (including ongoing registration fees, licensing fees and the fees and expenses of the independent directors of USCF), USO will realize a net yield that will tend to cause daily changes in the per share NAV of USO to track slightly higher than daily changes in the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract. If short-term interest rates rise above the current levels, the level of deviation created by the yield would decrease.increase. Conversely, if short-term interest rates were to decline, the amount of error created by the yield would increase.decrease. When short-term yields drop to a level lower than the combined expenses of the management fee and the brokerage commissions, then the tracking error becomes a negative number and would tend to cause the daily returns of the per share NAV to underperform the daily returns of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract. USCF anticipates that interest rates willmay continue to remain atdecrease over the near future from historical lows and, therefore, itlows. It is anticipated that fees and expenses paid by USO willmay continue to be higherlower than interest earned by USO. As such, USCF anticipates that USO will continue to underperformcould possibly outperform its benchmark until such a time whenso long as interest earned at least equals or exceeds the fees and expenses paid by USO.

Third, USO may hold Other Oil-Related Investments in its portfolio that may fail to closely track the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract’s total return movements. In that case, the error in tracking the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract could result in daily changes in the per share NAV of USO that are either too high, or too low, relative to the daily changes in the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, USO did not hold any Other Oil-Related Investments. If USO increases in size, and due to its obligations to comply with regulatory limits, USO may invest in Other Oil-Related Investments which may have the effect of increasing transaction related expenses and may result in increased tracking error.

Term Structure of Crude Oil Futures Prices and the Impact on Total Returns. Several factors determine the total return from investing in futures contracts. One factor arises from “rolling” futures contracts that will expire at the end of the current month (the “near” or “front” month contract) forward each month prior to expiration. For a strategy that entails holding the near month contract, the price relationship between that futures contract and the next month futures contract will impact returns. For example, if the price of the near month futures contract is higher than the next futures month contract (a situation referred to as “backwardation”), then absent any other change, the price of a next month futures contract tends to rise in value as it becomes the near month futures contract and approaches expiration. Conversely, if the price of a near month futures contract is lower than the next month futures contract (a situation referred to as “contango”), then absent any other change, the price of a next month futures contract tends to decline in value as it becomes the near month futures contract and approaches expiration.

As an example, assume that the price of crude oil for immediate delivery, is $50 per barrel, and the value of a position in the near month futures contract is also $50. Over time, the price of crude oil will fluctuate based on a number of market factors, including demand for oil relative to supply. The value of the near month futures contract will likewise fluctuate in reaction to a number of market factors. If an investor seeks to maintain a position in a near month futures contract and not take delivery of physical barrels of crude oil, the investor must sell the current near month futures contract as it approaches expiration and invest in the next month futures contract. In order to continue holding a position in the current near month futures contract, this “roll” forward of the futures contract must be executed every month.

24

25

Contango and backwardation are natural market forces that have impacted the total return on an investment in USO’s shares during the past year relative to a hypothetical direct investment in crude oil. In the future, it is likely that the relationship between the market price of USO’s shares and changes in the spot prices of light, sweet crude oil will continue to be impacted by contango and backwardation. It is important to note that this comparison ignores the potential costs associated with physically owning and storing crude oil, which could be substantial.

If the futures market is in backwardation, e.g., when the price of the near month futures contract is higher than the price of the next month futures contract, the investor would buy a next month futures contract for a lower price than the current near month futures contract. Assuming the price of the next month futures contract was $49 per barrel, or 2% cheaper than the $50 near month futures contract, then, hypothetically, and assuming no other changes (e.g., to either prevailing crude oil prices or the price relationship between the spot price, the near month contract and the next month contract, and, ignoring the impact of commission costs and the income earned on cash and/or cash equivalents), the value of the $49 next month futures contract would rise to $50 as it approaches expiration. In this example, the value of an investment in the next month futures contract would tend to outperform the spot price of crude oil. As a result, it would be possible for the new near month futures contract to rise 12% while the spot price of crude oil may have risen a lower amount, e.g., only 10%. Similarly, the spot price of crude oil could have fallen 10% while the value of an investment in the futures contract might have fallen another amount, e.g., only 8%. Over time, if backwardation remained constant, this difference between the spot price and the futures contract price would continue to increase.

If the futures market is in contango, an investor would be buying a next month futures contract for a higher price than the current near month futures contract. Again, assuming the near month futures contract is $50 per barrel, the price of the next month futures contract might be $51 per barrel, or 2% more expensive than the front month futures contract. Hypothetically, and assuming no other changes, the value of the $51 next month futures contract would fall to $50 as it approaches expiration. In this example, the value of an investment in the second month would tend to underperform the spot price of crude oil. As a result, it would be possible for the new near month futures contract to rise only 10% while the spot price of crude oil may have risen a higher amount, e.g., 12%. Similarly, the spot price of crude oil could have fallen 10% while the value of an investment in the second month futures contract might have fallen another amount, e.g., 12%. Over time, if contango remained constant, this difference between the spot price and the futures contract price would continue to increase.

25

26

The chart below compares the daily price of the near month crude oil futures contract to the price of 13th month crude oil futures contract (i.e., a contract one year forward) over the last 10 years. When the price of the near month futures contract is higher than the price of the near 13th month futures contracts,contract, the market would be described as being in backwardation. When the price of the near month futures contract is lower than the 13th month futures contracts,contract, the market would be described as being in contango. Although the price of the near month futures contract and the price of the near 13th month futures contractscontract tend to move together, it can be seen that at times the near month futures contract prices are higher than the 13th month futures contractscontract prices (backwardation), and, at other times, the near month futures contract prices are lower than the 13th month futures contract prices (contango).

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Graphic

26

27

An alternative way to view the same data is to subtract the dollar price of the 13th month crude oil futures contract from the dollar price of the near month crude oil futures contract, as shown in the chart below. When the difference is positive, the market is in backwardation. When the difference is negative, the market is in contango. The crude oil market spent time in both backwardation and contango during the last ten years.

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

Graphic

27

An investment in a portfolio that owned only the near month crude oil futures contract would likely produce a different result than an investment in a portfolio that owned an equal number of each of the near 12 months’ of crude oil futures contracts. Generally speaking, when the crude oil futures market is in backwardation, a portfolio of only the near month crude oil futures contract may tend to have a higher total return than a portfolio of 12 months’ of the crude oil futures contract. Conversely, if the crude oil futures market was in contango, the portfolio containing only 12 months’ of crude oil futures contracts may tend to outperform the portfolio holding only the near month crude oil futures contract.

28

Historically, the crude oil futures markets have experienced periods of contango and backwardation, with backwardation being in place roughly assomewhat less often asthan contango since oil futures trading started in 1982. Following the global financial crisis in the fourth quarter of 2008, the crude oil market moved into contango and remained in contango for a period of several years. During parts of 2009, the level of contango was unusually steep as a combination of slack U.S. and global demand for crude oil and issues involving the physical transportation and storage of crude oil at Cushing, Oklahoma, the primary pricing point for oil traded in the U.S., led to unusually high inventories of crude oil. A combination of improved transportation and storage capacity, along with growing demand for crude oil globally, moderated the inventory build-up and led to reduced levels of contango by 2011. However, at the end of November 2014, global crude oil inventories grew rapidly after the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries’Countries (“OPEC”) decidedvoted to defend its market share against U.S. shale-oil producers, resulting in another period during which the crude oil market remained primarily in contango, sometimes steep contango. This period of contango continued through December 31, 2016. In addition, the2017. Declining global crude oil markets are expectedinventories caused the market to remainflip into backwardation at the beginning of 2018 through late October 2018, at which point ongoing supply growth in contango untilthe U.S. and, combined with increased OPEC production, once again led market participants to fear another global oil inventories decline significantly. If OPEC’s recent cuts in oil production have their intended effect on theglut of crude oil. The crude oil market then such a decline may occurremained in 2017.

contango through September 30, 2019.

Periods of contango or backwardation do not materially impact USO’s investment objective of having the daily percentage changes in its per share NAV track the daily percentage changes in the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract since the impact of backwardation and contango tend to equally impact the daily percentage changes in price of both USO’s shares and the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract. It is impossible to predict with any degree of certainty whether backwardation or contango will occur in the future. It is likely that both conditions will occur during different periods.

Crude Oil Market.During the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, crude oil prices have traded in a range between $43$45.41 to $53$66.30. Crude oil rose over 19.07% from the end of 2018 through September 30, 2019 finishing the quarter at $54.07. Crude is down 18.45% since its April high as U.S. productiona result of falling global growth threatened to overwhelmforecasts, negative economic news, and persistently declining oil demand growth, all of which were at least partially the impactresult of OPECthe ongoing trade wars. Prices briefly spiked 14.68% following the September 16, 2019 attacks on Saudi oil facilities that knocked out five percent of global daily supply, cuts.  Prices rose during the third quarter as U.S.but quickly fell back on ongoing negative sentiment and global inventories declined.  U.S. storage fell faster than the normal seasonal pace and dropped below prior-year inventory levels for the first time since 2014.  U.S. production ramped up steadily throughout the year, returning to record levels last seen during summer 2015.  However, production and rig count growth both appeared to level off towardseconomic news. As of the end of the third quarter of 2019, U.S. crude storage was 5% higher than a year ago, and may represent caution on1% higher than the partfive-year average level. OPEC has pledged to do “whatever it takes” to support oil prices, however some signs of producers.  Temporary disruptionsfraying alliance between Russia and Saudi Arabia could put such efforts in jeopardy. While OPEC has been aggressive about meeting target cuts, continued growth in U.S. shale production also occurred as a result of hurricane Harvey.  Looking ahead, expectedthreatens to oversupply the market relative to demand growth. All three major energy agencies (OPEC, EIA, IEA) have lowered their 2019 demand growth appears strong while OPEC has stated it is prepared to take any action necessary to perpetuate the current trend towards a balanced market.forecasts. Should global demand growth forecasts fail to be realized,continue moderating or if OPEC is unable to counter growing U.S. production, there is a meaningful possibility thatturn negative, crude prices couldwould likely fall again.  Onfurther. However, geopolitical risk has increased, while a geopolitical risk premium only briefly materialized in the other hand, increasing global tensions andprice of crude. Further surprise attacks on crude infrastructure or conflicts in the possibility of any number of conflicts escalating could lead to price shocksMiddle East would likely create volatility to the upside. 

upside, should such events occur.

Crude Oil Price Movements in Comparison to Other Energy Commodities and Investment Categories. USCF believes that investors frequently measure the degree to which prices or total returns of one investment or asset class move up or down in value in concert with another investment or asset class. Statistically, such a measure is usually done by measuring the correlation of the price movements of the two different investments or asset classes over some period of time. The correlation is scaled between 1 and -1, where 1 indicates that the two investment options move up or down in price or value together, known as “positive correlation,” and -1 indicates that they move in completely opposite directions, known as “negative correlation.” A correlation of 0 would mean that the movements of the two are neither positively nor negatively correlated, known as “non-correlation.” That is, the investment options sometimes move up and down together and other times move in opposite directions.

28

29

For the ten-year time period between September 30, 20072009 and September 30, 2017,2019, the table below compares the monthly movements of crude oil prices versus the monthly movements of the prices of several other energy commodities, such as natural gas, diesel-heating oil, and unleaded gasoline, as well as several major non-commodity investment asset classes, such as large cap U.S. equities, U.S. government bonds and global equities. It can be seen that over this particular time period, the movement of crude oil on a monthly basis exhibited strong correlation with unleaded gasoline and diesel-heating oil, moderate correlation with the movements of large cap U.S. equities and global equities, limitedlittle correlation with natural gas, and limitedmoderate negative correlation with U.S. government bonds.

     U.S.                
     Gov’t.                
     Bonds                
  Large  (EFFAS  Global             
  Cap U.S.  U.S.  Equities             
  Equities  Gov’t.  (FTSE     Diesel-       
Correlation Matrix (S&P  Bond  World  Unleaded  Heating  Natural  Crude 
September 30, 2007 – September 30, 2017* 500)  Index)  Index)  Gasoline  Oil  Gas  Oil 
Large Cap U.S. Equities (S&P 500)  1.000   (0.287)  0.965   0.446   0.436   0.083   0.464 
U.S. Gov’t. Bonds (EFFAS U.S. Gov’t. Bond Index)      1.000   (0.257)  (0.349)  (0.331)  (0.041)  (0.390)
Global Equities (FTSE World Index)          1.000   0.484   0.476   0.121   0.514 
Unleaded Gasoline              1.000   0.729   0.154   0.700 
Diesel-Heating Oil                  1.000   0.258   0.805 
Natural Gas                      1.000   0.263 
Crude Oil                          1.000 

Source: Bloomberg, NYMEX

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

    

U.S.

    

    

    

    

    

Gov’t.

Bonds

Large

(EFFAS

Global

Cap U.S.

U.S.

Equities

Equities

Gov’t.

(FTSE

Diesel-

Correlation Matrix

(S&P

Bond

World

Unleaded

Heating

Natural

Crude

September 30, 2009 – September 30, 2019*

    

500)

    

Index)

    

Index)

    

Gasoline

    

Oil

    

Gas

    

Oil

Large Cap U.S. Equities (S&P 500)

1.000

(0.407)

0.959

0.450

0.410

0.109

0.483

U.S. Gov’t. Bonds (EFFAS U.S. Gov’t. Bond Index)

  

1.000

(0.383)

(0.286)

(0.341)

(0.066)

(0.391)

Global Equities (FTSE World Index)

  

  

1.000

0.474

0.444

0.104

0.515

Unleaded Gasoline

  

  

  

1.000

0.674

0.103

0.654

Diesel-Heating Oil

  

  

  

  

1.000

0.105

0.782

Natural Gas

  

  

  

  

  

1.000

0.072

Crude Oil

  

  

  

  

  

  

1.000

Source: Bloomberg, NYMEX

The table below covers a more recent, but much shorter, range of dates than the above table. Over the one year period ended September 30, 2017,2019, movements of crude oil displayed strong correlation with unleaded gasoline, diesel-heating oil, large cap U.S. equities and diesel-heating oil, moderate correlation with movements of global equities, and limitedmoderate negative to little correlation with movements with U.S. Governmentgovernment bonds unleaded gasoline and natural gas.

     U.S.                
     Gov’t.                
     Bonds                
  Large  (EFFAS  Global             
  Cap U.S.  U.S.  Equities             
  Equities  Gov’t.  (FTSE     Diesel-       
Correlation Matrix (S&P  Bond  World  Unleaded  Heating  Natural  Crude 
12 Months ended September 30, 2017* 500)  Index)  Index)  Gasoline  Oil  Gas  Oil 
Large Cap U.S. Equities (S&P 500)  1.000   (0.229)  0.768   (0.150)  0.326   (0.331)  0.620 
U.S. Gov’t. Bonds (EFFAS U.S. Gov’t. Bond Index)      1.000   0.288   0.319   (0.103)  (0.271)  (0.393)
Global Equities (FTSE World Index)          1.000   (0.124)  0.223   (0.516)  0.515 
Unleaded Gasoline              1.000   0.497   0.408   (0.212)
Diesel-Heating Oil                  1.000   0.185   0.676 
Natural Gas                      1.000   (0.119)
Crude Oil                          1.000 

Source: Bloomberg, NYMEX

*PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

    

U.S.

    

    

    

    

    

Gov’t.

Bonds

Large

(EFFAS

Global

Cap U.S.

U.S.

Equities

Equities

Gov’t.

(FTSE

Diesel-

Correlation Matrix

(S&P

Bond

World

Unleaded

Heating

Natural

Crude

12 Months ended September 30, 2019*

    

500)

    

Index)

    

Index)

    

Gasoline

    

Oil

    

Gas

    

Oil

Large Cap U.S. Equities (S&P 500)

  

1.000

  

(0.337)

  

0.992

  

0.619

  

0.642

  

0.271

  

0.737

U.S. Gov’t. Bonds (EFFAS U.S. Gov’t. Bond Index)

  

  

  

1.000

  

(0.320)

  

(0.340)

  

(0.566)

  

(0.219)

  

(0.382)

Global Equities (FTSE World Index)

  

  

  

  

  

1.000

  

0.633

  

0.665

  

0.192

  

0.762

Unleaded Gasoline

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

1.000

  

0.736

  

(0.304)

  

0.789

Diesel-Heating Oil

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

1.000

  

(0.307)

  

0.953

Natural Gas

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

1.000

  

(0.323)

Crude Oil

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

1.000

29

Source: Bloomberg, NYMEX

Investors are cautioned that the historical price relationships between crude oil and various other energy commodities, as well as other investment asset classes, as measured by correlation may not be reliable predictors of future price movements and correlation results. The results pictured above would have been different if a different range of dates had been selected. USCF believes that crude oil has historically not demonstrated a strong correlation with equities or bonds over long periods of time. However, USCF also believes that in the future it is possible that crude oil could have long term correlation results that indicate prices of crude oil more closely track the movements of equities or bonds. In addition, USCF believes that, when measured over time periods shorter than ten years, there will always be some periods where the correlation of crude oil to equities and bonds will be either more strongly positively correlated or more strongly negatively correlated than the long term historical results suggest.

30

The correlations between crude oil, natural gas, diesel-heating oil and gasoline are relevant because USCF endeavors to invest USO’s assets in Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments so that daily changes in percentage terms in USO’s per share NAV correlate as closely as possible with daily changes in percentage terms in the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract. If certain other fuel-based commodity futures contracts do not closely correlate with the crude oilcrude-oil futures contract, then their use could lead to greater tracking error. As noted above, USCF also believes that the changes in percentage terms in the price of the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract will closely correlate with changes in percentage terms in the spot price of light, sweet crude oil.

Critical Accounting Policies

Preparation of the condensed financial statements and related disclosures in compliance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the application of appropriate accounting rules and guidance, as well as the use of estimates. USO’s application of these policies involves judgments and actual results may differ from the estimates used.

USCF has evaluated the nature and types of estimates that it makes in preparing USO’s condensed financial statements and related disclosures and has determined that the valuation of its investments, which are not traded on a United States or internationally recognized futures exchange (such as forward contracts and OTC swaps) involves a critical accounting policy. The values which are used by USO for its Oil Futures Contracts are provided by its commodity broker who uses market prices when available, while OTC swaps are valued based on the present value of estimated future cash flows that would be received from or paid to a third party in settlement of these derivative contracts prior to their delivery date and valued on a daily basis. In addition, USO estimates interest and dividend income on a daily basis using prevailing rates earned on its cash and cash equivalents. These estimates are adjusted to the actual amount received on a monthly basis and the difference, if any, is not considered material.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

USO has not made, and does not anticipate making, use of borrowings or other lines of credit to meet its obligations. USO has met, and it is anticipated that USO will continue to meet, its liquidity needs in the normal course of business from the proceeds of the sale of its investments, or from the Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents that it intends to hold at all times. USO’s liquidity needs include: redeeming shares, providing margin deposits for its existing Oil Futures Contracts or the purchase of additional Oil Futures Contracts and posting collateral for its OTC swaps, if applicable, and payment of its expenses, summarized below under Contractual ObligationsObligations.”.”

USO currently generates cash primarily from: (i) the sale of baskets consisting of 100,000 shares (“Creation Baskets”) and (ii) income earned on Treasuries, cash and/or cash equivalents. USO has allocated substantially all of its net assets to trading in Oil Interests. USO invests in Oil Interests to the fullest extent possible without being leveraged or unable to satisfy its current or potential margin or collateral obligations with respect to its investments in Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments. A significant portion of USO’sUSO's NAV is held in cash and cash equivalents that are used as margin and as collateral for its trading in Oil Interests. The balance of the assets is held in USO’sUSO's account at its custodian bank and in Treasuries at the FCM. Income received from USO’sUSO's investments in money market funds and Treasuries is paid to USO. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, USO’s2019, USO's expenses did not exceed the income USO earned and the cash earned from the sale of Creation Baskets and the redemption of Redemption Baskets. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, USO used other assets to pay expenses, which could cause a decrease in USO’s NAV over time.expenses. To the extent expenses exceed income, USO’sUSO's NAV will be negatively impacted.

USO’s investments in Oil Interests may be subject to periods of illiquidity because of market conditions, regulatory considerations and other reasons. For example, most commodity exchanges limit the fluctuations in futures contracts prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily limits.” During a single day, no trades may be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. Once the price of a futures contract has increased or decreased by an amount equal to the daily limit, positions in the contracts can neither be taken nor liquidated unless the traders are willing to effect trades at or within the specified daily limit. Such market conditions could prevent USO from promptly liquidating its positions in Oil Futures Contracts. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, USO did not purchase or liquidate any of its positions while daily limits were in effect; however, USO cannot predict whether such an event may occur in the future.

30

Since March 23, 2007, USO has been responsible for expenses relating to: (i) management fees, (ii) brokerage fees and commissions, (iii) licensing fees for the use of intellectual property, (iv) ongoing registration expenses in connection with offers and sales of its shares subsequent to the initial offering, (v) other expenses, including tax reporting costs, (vi) fees and expenses of the independent directors of USCF and (vii) other extraordinary expenses not in the ordinary course of business, while USCF has been responsible for expenses relating to the fees of USO’s Marketing Agent, Administrator and Custodian and registration expenses relating to the initial offering of shares. If USCF and USO are unsuccessful in raising sufficient funds to cover these respective expenses or in locating any other source of funding, USO will terminate and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

31

Market Risk

Trading in Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments, such as forwards, involves USO entering into contractual commitments to purchase or sell oil at a specified date in the future. The aggregate market value of the contracts will significantly exceed USO’s future cash requirements since USO intends to close out its open positions prior to settlement. As a result, USO is generally only subject to the risk of loss arising from the change in value of the contracts. USO considers the “fair value” of its derivative instruments to be the unrealized gain or loss on the contracts. The market risk associated with USO’s commitments to purchase oil is limited to the aggregate market value of the contracts held. However, should USO enter into a contractual commitment to sell oil, it would be required to make delivery of the oil at the contract price, repurchase the contract at prevailing prices or settle in cash. Since there are no limits on the future price of oil, the market risk to USO could be unlimited.

USO’s exposure to market risk depends on a number of factors, including the markets for oil, the volatility of interest rates and foreign exchange rates, the liquidity of the Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments markets and the relationships among the contracts held by USO. Drastic market occurrences could ultimately lead to the loss of all or substantially all of an investor’s capital.

Credit Risk

When USO enters into Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments, it is exposed to the credit risk that the counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations. The counterparty for the Oil Futures Contracts traded on the NYMEX and on most other futures exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with the particular exchange. In general, in addition to margin required to be posted by the clearinghouse in connection with cleared trades, clearinghouses are backed by their members who may be required to share in the financial burden resulting from the nonperformance of one of their members and, therefore, this additional member support should significantly reduce credit risk. USO is not currently a member of any clearinghouse. Some foreign exchanges are not backed by their clearinghouse members but may be backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions. In addition, USO faces the risk of non-performance by any counterparties to OTC contracts. Unlike in the case of exchange-traded Futures Contracts, the counterparty to an OTC contract is generally a single bank or other financial institution. As a result, there will be greater counterparty credit risk in OTC transactions. There can be no assurance that any counterparty, clearinghouse, or their members or their financial backers will satisfy their obligations to USO in such circumstances.

USCF attempts to manage the credit risk of USO by following various trading limitations and policies. In particular, USO generally posts margin and/or holds liquid assets that are approximately equal to the market value of its obligations to counterparties under the Oil Futures Contracts and Other Oil-Related Investments it holds. USCF has implemented procedures that include, but are not limited to, executing and clearing trades only with creditworthy parties and/or requiring the posting of collateral or margin by such parties for the benefit of USO to limit its credit exposure. An FCM, when acting on behalf of USO in accepting orders to purchase or sell Oil Futures Contracts on United States exchanges, is required by CFTC regulations to separately account for and segregate as belonging to USO, all assets of USO relating to domestic Oil Futures Contracts trading. These FCMs are not allowed to commingle USO’s assets with their other assets. In addition, the CFTC requires commodity brokersFCMs to hold in a secure account USO’s assets related to foreign Oil Futures Contracts trading.

In the future, USO may purchase OTC swaps, see“Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of OTC swaps.

As of September 30, 2017,2019, USO held cash deposits and investments in Treasuries and money market funds in the amount of $2,206,896,479$1,495,037,213 with the custodian and FCM. Some or all of these amounts held by a custodian or an FCM, as applicable, may be subject to loss should USO’s custodian or FCM, as applicable, cease operations.

31

Off Balance Sheet Financing

As of September 30, 2017,2019, USO had no loan guarantee, credit support or other off-balance sheet arrangements of any kind other than agreements entered into in the normal course of business, which may include indemnification provisions relating to certain risks that service providers undertake in performing services which are in the best interests of USO. While USO’s exposure under these indemnification provisions cannot be estimated, they are not expected to have a material impact on USO’s financial position.

32

European Sovereign Debt

USO had no direct exposure to European sovereign debt as of September 30, 20172019 and has no direct exposure to European sovereign debt as of the filing of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Redemption Basket Obligation

In order to meet its investment objective and pay its contractual obligations described below, USO requires liquidity to redeem shares, which redemptions must be in blocks of 100,000 shares called “Redemption Baskets.” USO has to date satisfied this obligation by paying from the cash or cash equivalents it holds or through the sale of its Treasuries in an amount proportionate to the number of shares being redeemed.

Contractual Obligations

USO’s primary contractual obligations are with USCF. In return for its services, USCF is entitled to a management fee calculated daily and paid monthly as a fixed percentage of USO’s NAV, currently 0.45% of NAV on its average daily total net assets.

USCF agreed to pay the start-up costs associated with the formation of USO, primarily its legal, accounting and other costs in connection with USCF’s registration with the CFTC as a CPO and the registration and listing of USO and its shares with the SEC, FINRA and NYSE Arca (formerly, AMEX), respectively. However, since USO’s initial offering of shares, offering costs incurred in connection with registering and listing additional shares of USO have been directly borne on an ongoing basis by USO, and not by USCF.

USCF pays the fees of the Marketing Agent and the fees of BBH&Co., as well as BBH&Co.’s fees for performing administrative services, including those in connection with the preparation of USO’s condensed financial statements and its SEC, NFA and CFTC reports. USCF and USO have also entered into a licensing agreement with the NYMEX pursuant to which USO and the Related Public Funds, other than BNO, USCI, CPER, USOU and USAG,USOD, pay a licensing fee to the NYMEX. USO also pays the fees and expenses associated with its tax accounting and reporting requirements.

In addition to USCF’s management fee, USO pays its brokerage fees (including fees to an FCM), OTC dealer spreads, any licensing fees for the use of intellectual property, and, subsequent to the initial offering, registration and other fees paid to the SEC, FINRA, or other regulatory agencies in connection with the offer and sale of shares, as well as legal, printing, accounting and other expenses associated therewith, and extraordinary expenses. The latter are expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of USO’s business, including expenses relating to the indemnification of any person against liabilities and obligations to the extent permitted by law and under the LP Agreement, the bringing or defending of actions in law or in equity or otherwise conducting litigation and incurring legal expenses and the settlement of claims and litigation. Commission payments to an FCM are on a contract-by-contract, or round turn, basis. USO also pays a portion of the fees and expenses of the independent directors of USCF. SeeNote 3to theNotes to Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited) inItem 1 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

The parties cannot anticipate the amount of payments that will be required under these arrangements for future periods, as USO’s per share NAVs and trading levels to meet its investment objective will not be known until a future date. These agreements are effective for a specific term agreed upon by the parties with an option to renew, or, in some cases, are in effect for the duration of USO’s existence. Either party may terminate these agreements earlier for certain reasons described in the agreements.

As of September 30, 2017,2019, USO’s portfolio consisted of 44,68225,597 WTI Crude Oil Futures CL November 2017 Contracts traded on the NYMEX. As of September 30, 2017,2019, USO did not hold any Oil Futures Contracts traded on the ICE Futures Europe.Futures. For a list of USO’s current holdings, please see USO’s website at www.uscfinvestments.com.

32

33

Item 3.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Commodity Price Risk.

USO is exposed to commodity price risk. In particular, USO is exposed to crude oil price risk through its holdings of Oil Futures Contracts together with any other derivatives in which it may invest, which are discussed below. As a result, fluctuations in the value of the Oil Futures Contracts that USO holds in its portfolio, as described in“Contractual Obligations”Obligations" under“Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”Operations" above, are expected to directly affect the value of USO’s shares.

OTC Contract Risk

Currently, OTC transactions are subject to changing regulation.

USO may purchase OTC Oil Interests, such as forward contracts or swap or spot contracts. Unlike most exchange-traded futures contracts or exchange-traded options on such futures, each party to an OTC swap bears the credit risk that the other party may not be able to perform its obligations under its contract.

USO may enter into certain transactions where an OTC component is exchanged for a corresponding futures contract (“Exchange for Related Position” or “EFRP” transactions). In the most common type of EFRP transaction entered into by USO, the OTC component is the purchase or sale of one or more baskets of USO shares. These EFRP transactions may expose USO to counterparty risk during the interim period between the execution of the OTC component and the exchange for a corresponding futures contract. Generally, the counterparty risk from the EFRP transaction will exist only on the day of execution.

Swap transactions, like other financial transactions, involve a variety of significant risks. The specific risks presented by a particular swap transaction necessarily depend upon the terms and circumstances of the transaction. In general, however, all swap transactions involve some combination of market risk, credit risk, counterparty credit risk, funding risk, liquidity risk and operational risk.

Highly customized swap transactions in particular may increase liquidity risk, which may result in a suspension of redemptions. Highly leveraged transactions may experience substantial gains or losses in value as a result of relatively small changes in the value or level of an underlying or related market factor.

In evaluating the risks and contractual obligations associated with a particular swap transaction, it is important to consider that a swap transaction may be modified or terminated only by mutual consent of the original parties and subject to agreement on individually negotiated terms. Therefore, it may not be possible for USCF to modify, terminate or offset USO’s obligations or its exposure to the risks associated with a transaction prior to its scheduled termination date.

To reduce the credit risk that arises in connection with such contracts, USO will generally enter into an agreement with each counterparty based on the Master Agreement published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association that provides for the netting of its overall exposure to its counterparty, if the counterparty is unable to meet its obligations to USO due to the occurrence of a specified event, such as the insolvency of the counterparty.

USCF assesses or reviews, as appropriate, the creditworthiness of each potential or existing counterparty to an OTC swap pursuant to guidelines approved by USCF’s board of directors (the “Board”"Board"). Furthermore, USCF on behalf of USO only enters into OTC swaps with counterparties who are, or are affiliates of, (a) banks regulated by a United States federal bank regulator, (b) broker-dealers regulated by the SEC, (c) insurance companies domiciled in the United States, or (d) producers, users or traders of energy, whether or not regulated by the CFTC. Any entity acting as a counterparty shall be regulated in either the United States or the United Kingdom unless otherwise approved by the Board after consultation with its legal counsel. Existing counterparties are also reviewed periodically by USCF. USO will also require that the counterparty be highly rated and/or provide collateral or other credit support. Even if collateral is used to reduce counterparty credit risk, sudden changes in the value of OTC transactions may leave a party open to financial risk due to a counterparty default since the collateral held may not cover a party’s exposure on the transaction in such situations.

34

In general, valuing OTC derivatives is less certain than valuing actively traded financial instruments such as exchange-traded futures contracts and securities or cleared swaps because the price and terms on which such OTC derivatives are entered into or can be terminated are individually negotiated, and those prices and terms may not reflect the best price or terms available from other sources. In addition, while market makers and dealers generally quote indicative prices or terms for entering into or terminating OTC swaps, they typically are not contractually obligated to do so, particularly if they are not a party to the transaction. As a result, it may be difficult to obtain an independent value for an outstanding OTC derivatives transaction.

During the nine monthsmonth reporting period ended September 30, 2017,2019, USO limited its OTC activities to EFRP transactions.

33

USO anticipates that the use of Other Oil-Related Investments together with its investments in Oil Futures Contracts will produce price and total return results that closely track the investment goals of USO. However, there can be no assurance of this. OTC swaps may result in higher transaction-related expenses than the brokerage commissions paid in connection with the purchase of Oil Futures Contracts, which may impact USO’s ability to successfully track the Benchmark Oil Futures Contract.

Item 4.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

USO maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in USO’s periodic reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

The duly appointed officers of USCF, including its chief executive officer and chief financial officer, who perform functions equivalent to those of a principal executive officer and principal financial officer of USO if USO had any officers, have evaluated the effectiveness of USO’s disclosure controls and procedures and have concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures of USO have been effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

Change in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in USO’s internal control over financial reporting during USO’s last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, USO’s internal control over financial reporting.

35

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

Not applicable.

Item 1A.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in USO’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2018, filed on February 24, 2017.25, 2019.

Item 2.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(a)

None.

(b)

(a)

None.

(b)

Not applicable.

(c)

(c)

USO does not purchase shares directly from its shareholders. In connection with its redemption of baskets held by Authorized Participants, USO redeemed 1,889999 baskets (comprising 188,900,00099,900,000 shares) during the third quarter of the year endedending December 31, 2017.2019. The following table summarizes the redemptions by Authorized Participants during the three months ended September 30, 2017:2019:

34

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

    

Total

    

Number of

Shares

Average Price Per

Period

Redeemed

Share

7/1/19 to 7/31/19

 

39,600,000

$

11.95

8/1/19 to 8/31/19

 

32,400,000

$

11.46

9/1/19 to 9/30/19

 

27,900,000

$

12.07

Total

 

99,900,000

 

  

Period Total
Number of
Shares
Redeemed
  Average Price Per
Share
 
7/1/17 to 7/31/17  103,200,000  $9.69 
8/1/17 to 8/31/17  29,700,000  $9.97 
9/1/17 to 9/30/17  56,000,000  $10.21 
Total  188,900,000     

Item 3.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable.

Item 4.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

Monthly Account Statements

Pursuant to the requirement under Rule 4.22 under the Commodity Exchange Act, each month USO publishes an account statement for its shareholders, which includes a Statement of Income (Loss) and a Statement of Changes in Net Asset Value. The account statement is furnished to the SEC on a current report on Form 8-K pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and posted each month on USO’s website at www.uscfinvestments.com.

36

Other Information.

Not applicable.

Item 6.

Item 6. Exhibits.

Listed below are the exhibits, which are filed as part of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (according to the number assigned to them in Item 601 of Regulation S-K):

Exhibit Number

Description of Document

31.1(1)

Certification by Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2(1)

Certification by Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1(1)

Certification by Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2(1)

Certification by Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document. - The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.

 (1)   Filed herewith.

(1)Filed herewith.

35

37

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

United States Oil Fund, LP (Registrant)

By: United States Commodity Funds LLC, its general partner

By:

By:

/s/ John P. Love

John P. Love

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal executive officer)

Date:  November 6, 20178, 2019

By:

/s/ Stuart P. Crumbaugh

Stuart P. Crumbaugh

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal financial and accounting officer)

Date:  November 6, 20178, 2019

36

38