The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ EquityUnaudited

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements(unaudited)

Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations

Howard Bancorp, Inc. (“Bancorp” or the “Company”) was incorporated in April 2005 under the laws of the State of Maryland. On December 15, 2005, Howard Bancorp Inc. (“Bancorp”) acquired all of the stock and became the holding company of Howard Bank (the “Bank”) pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization approved by the stockholders of the Bank and by federal and state regulatory agencies. Each share of the Bank’s common stock was converted into two shares of Bancorp common stock effected by the filing of Articles of Exchange on that date, and the stockholders of the Bank became the stockholders of Bancorp. The Bank has seven subsidiaries, six of which are intended to hold foreclosed real estate (three of which are inactive) and the other owns and manages real estate thatBancorp is used as a branch location and has office and retail space. The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Bancorp and its wholly owned subsidiary, the Bank (collectively, the “Company”), have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

Bancorp was incorporated in April of 2005 under the laws of the State of Maryland and isnow a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. Bancorp is1956, with a single bank holding company with one subsidiary, theHoward Bank, which operates as a state trust company with commercial banking powers regulated by the Maryland Office of the Commissioner of Financial Regulation (the “Commissioner”).

The Bank has nine subsidiaries—six were formed to hold foreclosed real estate (three of which are currently inactive), two own and manage real estate used for corporate purposes, and one holds historic tax credit investments.

The Company is a diversified financial services company providing commercial banking, mortgage banking and consumer finance through banking branches, the internet and other distribution channels to businesses, business owners, professionals and other consumers located primarily in the Greater Baltimore Metropolitan Area.

On December 6, 2018,These statements should be read in conjunction with the Company entered into Subordinated Note Purchase Agreementsfinancial statements and accompanying notes included in the Company's 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with certain institutional accredited investors (the “Purchasers”the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") pursuant to which the Company sold and issued $25,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of 6.00% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Subordinated Notes due December 6, 2028 (the “Notes”). The Notes were issued by the Companyon March 16, 2020. There have been no significant changes to the Purchasers at a price equal to 100% of their face amountCompany's accounting policies as disclosed in a private offering in reliancethe 2019 Annual Report on the exemptions from registration available under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the provisions of Regulation D thereunder. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from this offering for general corporate purposes, to provide for continued growth and to supplement its regulatory capital ratios.

On March 1, 2018, Bancorp completed its previously announced merger (the “First Mariner merger”) with First Mariner Bank, a Maryland chartered trust company (“First Mariner”), pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated as August 14, 2017, and as amended by Amendment No. 1 on November 8, 2017, by and among Bancorp, the Bank and First Mariner (as amended, the “First Mariner Merger Agreement”). At the effective time of the First Mariner merger, First Mariner merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank continuing as the surviving bank of the First Mariner merger and a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. At the effective time of the First Mariner merger, each outstanding share of First Mariner common stock and First Mariner Series A Non-Voting Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock issued and outstanding was cancelled and converted into the right to receive 1.6624 shares of Bancorp common stock, provided that cash was paid in lieu of any fractional shares. The aggregate merger consideration of $173.8 million included $9.2 million of cash and 9,143,222 shares of our common stock, which was valued at approximately $164.6 million based on Bancorp’s closing stock price of $18.00 on February 28, 2018.Form 10-K.

The following is a description of the Company’s significant accounting policies.

Basis of Presentation

The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and prevailing practices within the financial services industry for financial information.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Bancorp, its subsidiary bankthe Bank and the Bank’s subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The parent company only financial statements report investments in the subsidiary bankBank under the equity method.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant changes in the near-term relate to the determination of the allowance for credit losses, goodwill, deferred tax assets, other-than-temporary impairment of investment securities and the fair value of loans held for sale.

Allowance for Credit Losses

The allowance for credit losses is maintained at a level believed adequate by management to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio and is based on the size and current risk characteristics of the loan and lease portfolio, an assessment of individual problem loans and leases, actual loss experience, current economic events in specific industries and geographic areas including unemployment levels and other pertinent factors including general economic conditions. Determination of the allowance is inherently subjective as it requires significant estimates, including the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans and leases, estimated losses on pools of homogenous loans and leases based on historical loss experience and consideration of economic trends, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. Credit losses are charged off against the allowance, while recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited to the allowance. A provision for credit losses is charged to operations based on management’s periodic evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, as well as other pertinent factors. Evaluations are conducted at least quarterly and more often if deemed necessary.

The allowance for credit losses consists of a specific component and a nonspecific component. The components of the allowance for credit losses represent an estimation done pursuant to either the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (the “FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 450Contingenciesor ASC Topic 310Receivables. The specific component of the allowance for credit losses reflects expected losses resulting from analysis developed through credit allocations for individual loans.loans and leases. The credit allocations are based on a regular analysis of all loans and leases over a fixed-dollar amount where the internal credit rating is at or below a predetermined classification. The specific component of the allowance for credit losses also includes management’s determination of the amounts necessary given concentrations and changes in portfolio mix and volume.

The nonspecific portion of the allowance is determined based on management’s assessment of general economic conditions, as well as economic factors in the individual markets in which the Company operates including the strength and timing of economic cycles and concerns over the effects of a prolonged economic downturn in the current cycle. This determination inherently involves a higher risk of uncertainty and considers current risk factors that may not have yet manifested themselves in the Bank’s historical loss factors used to determine the nonspecific component of the allowance, and it recognizes knowledge of the portfolio may be incomplete. The Bank’s historic loss factors are based upon actual losses incurred by portfolio segment over the preceding 24-month period. In portfolio segments where no actual losses have been incurred within the most recent 24-month period, industry loss data for that portfolio segment, as provided by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), are utilized. In addition to historic loss factors, the Bank’s methodology for the allowance for credit losses also incorporates other risk factors that may be inherent within the portfolio segments. For each portfolio segment, in addition to the historic loss experience, the otherqualitative factors that are measured and monitored in the overall determination of the allowance include:

Each of these qualitative risk factors is measured based upon data generated either internally, or in the case of economic conditions utilizing independently provided data on items such as unemployment rates, commercial real estate vacancy rates, or other market data deemed relevant to the business conditions within the markets served.

The Company’s loan and lease policies state that after all collection efforts have been exhausted, and the loan or lease is deemed to be a loss, then the remaining loan or lease balance will be charged to the Company’s established allowance for credit losses. All loans and leases are evaluated for loss potential once it has been determined by the Watch Committee that the likelihood of repayment is in doubt. When a loan is past due for at least 90 days or a deterioration in debt service coverage ratio, guarantor liquidity, or loan-to-value ratio has occurred that would cause concern regarding the likelihood of the full repayment of principal and interest, and the loan or lease is deemed not to be well secured, the loan shouldor lease would be moved to non-accrual status and a specific reserve is established if the net realizable value is less than the principal value of the loan balance(s). Once the actual loss value has been determined, a charge-off against the allowance for credit losses for the amount of the loss is taken. Each loss is evaluated on its specific facts regarding the appropriate timing to recognize the loss.

Acquired Loans

Acquired loans are recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition, and accordingly, no allowance for loan losses is transferred to the acquiring entity under the acquisition method. The fair values of loans with evidence of credit deterioration (acquired credit impaired loans) are initially recorded at fair value, but thereafter accounted for differently than purchased, non-credit-impaired loans. For acquired credit impaired loans, the excess of all cash flows estimated to be collectable at the date of acquisition over the initial investment in the acquired credit impaired loan is recognized as interest income, using a level-yield basis over the life of the loan. This amount is referred to as the accretable yield. The acquired credit impaired loan’s contractually-required payments receivable estimated to be in excess of the amount of its future cash flows expected at the date of acquisition is referred to as the non-accretable difference, and is not reflected as an adjustment to the yield, but in the form of a loss accrual or a valuation allowance.

Subsequent to the acquisition date, management continues to monitor cash flows on a quarterly basis, to determine the performance of each acquired credit impaired loan in comparison to management’s initial performance expectations. Subsequent decreases in the present value of expected cash flows will be recorded as an increase in the allowance for credit losses through a provision for loan losses. Subsequent significant increases in cash flows result in a reversal of the provision for loan losses to the extent of prior provisions or a reclassification of amount from non-accretable difference to accretable yield, with a positive impact on the accretion of interest income in future periods.

Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the sum of the estimated fair values of tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired less the estimated fair value of the liabilities assumed. Core deposit intangibles represent the estimated value of long-term deposit relationships acquired in a business combination. The core deposit intangible is amortized over the estimated useful lives of the long-term deposits acquired, and the remaining amounts of the core deposit intangible are periodically reviewed for impairment. Goodwill has an indefinite useful life and is evaluated for impairment annually or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. Long-lived assets are those that provide the companyCompany with a future economic benefit beyond the current year or operating period. Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset is greater than the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the cost or the fair value, less costs to sell. An impairment analysis is performed annually.

Management has determined that Bancorpthe Company has one reporting unit, and based upon the annual impairment analysis, it was determined that there was not an impairment of the carrying value of either the goodwill, core deposit intangible or other long-lived assets for 2018. The Company is not aware of any issues that have arisen since our last impairment analysis performed in the fourth quarter of 2018.2019.

Income Taxes

The Company uses the asset/liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under the asset/liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities (i.e., temporary differences) and are measured at the enacted rates that will be in effect when these differences reverse.

As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. In addition, deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized.

The Company does not have uncertain tax positions that are deemed material, and did not recognize any adjustments for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties on income taxes in other noninterest expenses. The Company remains subject to examination by federal and state taxing authorities for income tax returns for the years ending after December 31, 2015.2014.

Share-Based Compensation

Compensation cost is recognized for stock options and restricted stock issued to directors and employees. Compensation cost is measured as the fair value of these awards on their date of grant. A Black-Scholes model is utilized to estimate the fair value of stock options. The market price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant is used for restricted stock awards, which include restricted stock units. Compensation cost is recognized over the required service period, generally defined as the vesting period for stock option awards.period. For awards with graded vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. When an award is granted to an employee who is retirement eligible, the compensation cost of these awards is recognized over the period up to when the director or employee first becomes eligible to retire.

Compensation expense for non-vested common stock awards is based on the fair value of the awards, which is generally the market price of the common stock on the measurement date, which, for the Company, is the date of grant, and is recognized ratably over the service period of the award.

Reclassifications

Certain items inreclassifications to prior financial statements have been reclassifiedpresentation were made to conform to the current2020 presentation. These reclassifications did not affect previously reported net income or total stockholders’ equity.

NewRecent Accounting Pronouncements

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) has issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-16,Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Inclusion of the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) Overnight Index Swap (“OIS”) Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes.This ASU permits use of the OIS rate based on SOFR as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes. Alternative Reference Rates Committee has proposed that the SOFR is the rate that represents best practice as the alternative to derivatives currently indexed to London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The amendments should be adopted on a prospective basis for qualifying new or re-designated hedging relationships entered into on or after the date of adoption. The Company has non-designated hedge contracts that are indexed to LIBOR and is monitoring this activity and evaluating the related risks as they relate to derivatives.

The FASB has issued ASU 2018-13,2020-04,Fair Value MeasurementReference Rate Reform (Topic 820)848): Disclosure Framework— Changes toFacilitation of the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.This ASU eliminates, adds and modifies certain disclosure requirementsprovides optional guidance for fair value measurements. Amonga limited period of time to ease the changes, entities will no longer be required to disclosepotential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the amounteffects of) reference rate reform, on financial reporting. The risk of and reason for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2termination of the fair value hierarchy, but willLondon Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), has caused regulators to undertake reference rate reform initiatives to identify alternative reference rates that are more observable or transaction based that are less susceptible to manipulation.

The FASB has issued ASU 2019-10, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842). This ASU amends the effective date of the credit loss standard (ASU 2016-13) for smaller reporting companies, as defined by the SEC. The one-time determination of whether an entity is eligible to be required to disclosea smaller reporting company is based on an entity’s most recent determination as of November 15, 2019, in accordance with SEC regulations. The Company met this definition of smaller reporting company based on its most recent determination as of November 15, 2019. As a result, the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements. The amendments ineffective date of this ASU are effective for the Company has been amended from fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years, to fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2022, and interim periods within those fiscal years. In addition, this ASU amended the mandatory effective date for the elimination of Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test (ASU 2017-04 discussed below). As a smaller reporting company, the effective date of the goodwill impairment standard for the Company has been amended from fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted. Entities are also allowed2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years, to elect early adoption of the eliminated or modified disclosure requirementsfiscal years beginning after December 31, 2022, and delay adoption of the new disclosure requirements until their effective date. Since ASU 2018-13 only revises disclosure requirements, it will not have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.interim periods within those fiscal years.

The FASB has issued ASU 2017-04,Intangibles—Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.  The amendments in this Update simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The Company should perform its goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. Impairment charges should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The impairment charge is limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The amendments inAs discussed above, this Update areASU, as amended by ASU 2019-10, will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years.the Company on January 1, 2023. The Company will evaluate the guidance in this updateUpdate but does not expect it to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position or resultresults of operations.

The FASB has issued ASU 2016-13,Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326). The main objective of this update is to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. To achieve this objective, the guidance in this updateUpdate replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. An entity must use judgment in determining the relevant information and estimation methods that are appropriate in its circumstances. The guidance inAs discussed above, this update isASU, as amended by ASU 2019-10, will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years.the Company on January 1, 2023. The Company has engaged a third party vendor and is currently gathering historical data and reviewing the methodologies and assumptions utilized to determine the impact of this update on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

Note 2: Business CombinationsCOVID-19 Risks and Uncertainties

First Mariner AcquisitionIn December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) was reported to have surfaced in China, and has since spread to a number of other countries, including the United States. In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a global pandemic and the United States declared a National Public Health Emergency. The COVID-19 pandemic has severely restricted the level of economic activity in the Company’s markets. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the State of Maryland and most other states have taken preventative or protective actions, such as imposing restrictions on travel and business operations, advising or requiring individuals to limit or forego their time outside of their homes, and ordering temporary closures of businesses that have been deemed to be non-essential.

While the Company’s business has been designated an essential business, which allows the Bank to continue to serve its customers, the Company serves many customers that have been deemed, or who are employed by businesses that have been deemed, to be non-essential. And many of the Company’s customers that have been categorized to date as essential businesses, or who are employed by businesses that have been categorized as essential businesses, have been adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is fluid and continues to evolve. The COVID-19 pandemic and its associated impacts on trade (including supply chains and export levels), travel, employee productivity, unemployment, consumer spending, and other economic activities has resulted in less economic activity, lower equity market valuations and significant volatility and disruption in financial markets, and has had an adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. In addition, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, market interest rates have declined significantly, with the 10-year Treasury bond falling below 1.00% on March 3, 2020 for the first time. On March 3, 2020, the Federal Open Market Committee reduced the targeted federal funds interest rate range by 50 basis points to 1.00% to 1.25%. This range was further reduced to 0% to 0.25% percent on March 16, 2020. These reductions in interest rates and the other effects of the COVID-19 pandemic has had and is expected to continue to have a an adverse effect on the Company’s business and results of operations. The ultimate extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations is currently uncertain and will depend on various developments and other factors, including, among others, the duration and scope of the pandemic, as well as governmental, regulatory and private sector responses to the pandemic, and the associated impacts on the economy, financial markets and the Company’s customers, employees and vendors.

Note 2: Exit of Mortgage Banking Activities

On March 1, 2018, Howard Bancorp completed its previously announced merger with First MarinerDecember 18, 2019, the Company entered into an agreement to release certain management members of the Bank, pursuantmortgage division from their employment contracts and allow those individuals to create a limited liability company (“LLC”) for the purpose of hiring all remaining mortgage employees. The Company also agreed to transfer ownership of the domain name “VAmortgage.com” to the First Mariner Merger Agreement. At the effective timenewly created LLC. In consideration of the First Mariner merger, First Mariner merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank continuing as the surviving bankrelease of the First Mariner merger. Atemployment agreements, the effective timetransfer of the First Mariner merger, pursuant tomortgage employees, and the termssale of the First Mariner Merger Agreement, each outstanding sharedomain name, the LLC paid the Company $750 thousand. Under the agreement, there was a transition period of First Mariner common stockapproximately 45 days, after which the Company agreed to cease originating residential first lien mortgage loans and First Mariner Series A Non-Voting Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock issuedwill exit all mortgage banking activities. Accordingly all of the residential first lien mortgage pipeline were processed by the end of the first quarter of 2020. In order to manage loan run-off within the residential mortgage loan portfolio, the Company plans on buying first lien residential mortgage loans, on a servicing released basis, from both the LLC and outstanding was cancelled and converted into the right to receive 1.6624 shares of Howard Bancorp common stock, provided that cash was paid in lieu of any fractional shares. The aggregate merger consideration of $173.8 million included $9.2 million of cash and 9,143,222 shares of our common stock, which was valued at approximately $164.6 million based on Howard Bancorp’s closing stock price of $18.00 on February 28, 2018.other third-party originators.

The Company has accountedfollowing table presents a roll forward of loans held for sale, showing loans originated for sale and loans sold into the secondary market, for the First Mariner merger underperiods March 31, 2020 and, December 31, 2019. In addition, the acquisition methodvolume of accounting in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations,” whereby the acquired assets and assumed liabilities were recorded by Howard Bancorp at their estimated fair values as of their acquisition date.

Management made significant estimates and exercised significant judgment in accountingloans originated for the acquisition of First Mariner. Management judgmentally assigned risk ratings to loans based on appraisals and estimated collateral values, expected cash flows, prepayment speeds and estimated loss factors to measure fair values for loans. Deposits and borrowings were valued based upon interest rates, original and remaining terms and maturities,Company’s loan portfolio as well as current ratesa statement of operations for similar funds inthe mortgage banking activities for the same markets. Premisesperiods. Since the mortgage banking activities were conducted within a division of the Bank, formal financial statements were not prepared. The statement of operations presented below reflects only the direct costs associated with the Company’s mortgage banking activities and equipment was valued based on recent appraised values. Management used quoted or current market prices to determineis thus representative of the fair valueincremental after tax impact of investment securities.exiting this activity.

The following table provides

Since the purchase price asBank’s 91 employees that were engaged in mortgage banking activities were hired by the LLC under the terms of the date of the First Mariner merger (the “acquisition date”), the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values, and the resulting goodwill of $65.3 million recorded from the acquisition:

(in thousands)

The goodwill resulting from the First Mariner merger at June 30, 2019 of $65.3 million is lower than the $70.1 million reflected at December 31, 2018 due to a changeagreement, no severance costs were recorded. However, in the acquired value of the net deferred tax asset included in other assets above. At the acquisition date, wording of the TCJA appeared to indicate that appreciation in the cash value of acquired BOLI would not be consider exempt from taxation.  However, industry groups and congress had urged the IRS to issue regulations to clarify how this section of the TCJA would be applied.  In the firstfourth quarter of 2019, the IRS issued new proposed guidance which clarifiedCompany recorded $288 thousand of exit costs associated with change in control and retention agreements. Back office employees remained with the new law and made it more likely than not that the appreciated valuebank for a portion of the BOLI acquiredfirst quarter in order to process the pipeline. The LLC is subleasing the office space that was used by the Company would be tax exempt.

Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Information:

The following table presents unaudited pro forma information as if the First Mariner Merger had been completed on January 1, 2018. The pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the results of operations that would have occurred had the First Mariner Merger occurred at the beginning of 2018. Supplemental pro forma earningsthese employees; therefore, no exit costs associated with lease terminations were adjusted to exclude merger related costs. The expected future amortizations of the various fair value adjustments were included beginning of the period. Cost savings are not reflected in the unaudited pro forma amounts for the periods presented. The pro forma financial information does not include the impact of possible business model changes, nor does it consider any potential impacts of current market conditions on revenues, expense efficiencies, or other factors.required.

Note 3: Investment Securities

The Bank holds securities classified as available for sale and held to maturity.

As part of the Bank’s overall interest rate position strategies, the Bank sold $35.4 million of held for sale investment securities in the second quarter of 2019 recording a gain on the sale of $658 thousand. In 2018 the Bank sold $33.0 million of pre-acquisition investment securities and recorded a loss on the sale of $139 thousand. Because of the composition and remaining duration of the securities portfolio acquired in the First Mariner merger, management deemed it prudent for interest rate risk management purposes to liquidate the majority of the acquired portfolio. Thus, in the first quarter of 2018, the Bank sold nearly $69.37 million of First Mariner securities, with no gains or losses incurred upon the liquidation, as the sales were executed within days of the merger.

The amortized cost and estimated fair values of investments are as follows:

Gross unrealized losses and fair value by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and December 31, 20182019 are presented below: