AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following presents ~~noninterest~~non-interest income, segregated by revenue streams in-scope and out-of-scope of Topic 606, for the three ~~and six~~ month periods ending ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ (in thousands).

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019
Noninterest income:
Non-interest income:
In-scope of Topic 606
Wealth management fees		$	2,419		$	2,447		$	4,815		$	4,873		$	2,554		$	2,396
Service charges on deposit accounts			317			357			627			740			286			310
Other			435			435			854			852			390			420
Noninterest income (in-scope of topic 606)			3,171			3,239			6,296			6,465
Noninterest income (out-of-scope of topic 606)			486			442			966			851
Total noninterest income		$	3,657		$	3,681		$	7,262		$	7,316
Non-interest income (in-scope of Topic 606)															3,230			3,126
Non-interest income (out-of-scope of Topic 606)															602			479
Total non-interest income														$	3,832		$	3,605

Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per share include only the weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share include the weighted average common shares outstanding and any potentially dilutive common stock equivalent shares in the calculation. Treasury shares are excluded for earnings per share purposes. For the three ~~and six~~ month periods ending ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019, options to purchase 29,500 common shares, with an exercise price of $3.90 to $4.22, and options to purchase 12,000 common shares, with an exercise price of $4.19 to $4.22, respectively, were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share because to do so would be antidilutive. ~~There were no antidilutive securities during either period of 2018.~~

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019
	(In thousands, except per share data)												(In thousands, except per share data)
Numerator:
Net income		$	1,792		$	1,744		$	3,670		$	3,511		$	1,409		$	1,878
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding (basic)			17,476			18,038			17,527			18,058			17,043			17,578
Effect of stock options			84			102			84			100			56			86
Weighted average common shares outstanding (diluted)			17,560			18,140			17,611			18,158			17,099			17,664
Earnings per common share:
Earnings per common share:
Basic		$	0.10		$	0.10		$	0.21		$	0.19		$	0.08		$	0.11
Diluted			0.10			0.10			0.21			0.19			0.08			0.11

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~AmeriServ Financial, Inc.~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

7.6.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

On a consolidated basis, cash and cash equivalents include cash and due from depository institutions, ~~interest-bearing~~interest bearing deposits and short-term investments in money market funds ~~with original maturities of 90 days or less~~. The Company made ~~$300,000 in~~no income tax payments in the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$800,000 in the same 2018 period.~~2019. The Company made total interest payments of ~~$7,044,000~~$3,343,000 in the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2019~~2020 compared to ~~$5,287,000~~$3,524,000 in the same ~~2018~~2019 period. The Company had ~~$75,000~~no non-cash transfers to other real estate owned (OREO) in the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2019~~2020 compared to ~~$160,000~~$18,000 non-cash transfers in the same ~~2018~~2019 period. During the first three months of 2020, the Company entered into a new financing lease related to office equipment and recorded a

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

right-of-use asset and lease liability of $63,000. As a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) as of January 1, 2019, the Company had non-cash transactions associated with the recognition of the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. Specifically, the Company recognized a right-of-use asset and lease liability of $932,000 related to operating leases and a right-of-use asset and lease liability of $3.3 million related to financing ~~leases.~~leases during the first three months of 2019.

8.7.

Investment Securities

The cost basis and fair values of investment securities are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Investment securities available for sale (AFS):

	June 30, 2019												March 31, 2020
	Cost Basis			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Cost Basis			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
US Agency		$	7,489		$	54		$	—		$	7,543		$	3,895		$	72		$	—		$	3,967
US Agency mortgage-backed securities			90,523			1,602			(167)			91,958			78,862			3,278			(56)			82,084
Municipal			13,994			499			(22)			14,471			14,925			899			—			15,824
Corporate bonds			37,312			258			(454)			37,116			41,693			470			(1,322)			40,841
Total		$	149,318		$	2,413		$	(643)		$	151,088		$	139,375		$	4,719		$	(1,378)		$	142,716

Investment securities held to maturity (HTM):

	June 30, 2019												March 31, 2020
	Cost Basis			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Cost Basis			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
US Agency mortgage-backed securities		$	9,501		$	197		$	(18)		$	9,680		$	10,510		$	508		$	—		$	11,018
Municipal			24,216			881			(44)			25,053			25,527			1,674			(50)			27,151
Corporate bonds and other securities			6,035			49			(42)			6,042			6,031			42			(6)			6,067
Total		$	39,752		$	1,127		$	(104)		$	40,775		$	42,068		$	2,224		$	(56)		$	44,236

Investment securities available for sale (AFS):

	December 31, 2018												December 31, 2019
	Cost Basis			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Cost Basis			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
US Agency		$	7,685		$	4		$	(160)		$	7,529		$	5,084		$	32		$	—		$	5,116
US Agency mortgage-backed securities			90,169			516			(1,158)			89,527			80,046			1,681			(94)			81,633
Municipal			13,301			114			(234)			13,181			14,678			509			(17)			15,170
Corporate bonds			37,359			131			(996)			36,494			39,769			342			(281)			39,830
Total		$	148,514		$	765		$	(2,548)		$	146,731		$	139,577		$	2,564		$	(392)		$	141,749

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Investment securities held to maturity (HTM):

	December 31, 2018												December 31, 2019
	Cost Basis			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Cost Basis			Gross Unrealized Gains			Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
US Agency mortgage-backed securities		$	9,983		$	78		$	(132)		$	9,929		$	9,466		$	251		$	(4)		$	9,713
Municipal			24,740			131			(404)			24,467			24,438			941			(53)			25,326
Corporate bonds and other securities			6,037			13			(122)			5,928			6,032			58			(47)			6,043
Total		$	40,760		$	222		$	(658)		$	40,324		$	39,936		$	1,250		$	(104)		$	41,082

Maintaining investment quality is a primary objective of the Company’s investment policy which, subject to certain limited exceptions, prohibits the purchase of any investment security below a Moody’s Investor’s Service or Standard & Poor’s rating of “A.” At ~~June 30, 2019 and December~~March 31, ~~2018, 57.5%~~2020, 52.1% of the portfolio was rated “AAA”. as compared to 53.4% at December 31, 2019. Approximately ~~8.7%~~9.8% of the portfolio was either rated below “A” or unrated at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 as compared to ~~10.0%~~9.1% at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

~~The Company sold $530,000 AFS securities in the second quarter and first six months of 2019 resulting in $30,000 of gross investment security gains.~~ The Company sold no AFS securities during the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018. Total proceeds from the sale of AFS securities for the first six months of 2018 were $4.5 million resulting in $15,000 of gross investment security gains~~2020 and ~~$163,000 of gross investment security losses.~~2019.

The carrying value of securities, both available for sale and held to maturity, pledged to secure public and trust deposits was ~~$121,682,000~~$117,364,000 at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~$115,536,000~~$117,076,000 at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

The following tables present information concerning investments with unrealized losses as of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 (in thousands):

Total investment securities:

	June 30, 2019																		March 31, 2020
	Less than 12 months						12 months or longer						Total						Less than 12 months						12 months or longer						Total
	Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses
US Agency		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
US Agency mortgage-backed securities			—			—			21,440			(185)			21,440			(185)			2,363			(19)			1,885			(37)			4,248			(56)
Municipal			—			—			2,468			(66)			2,468			(66)			144			(1)			757			(49)			901			(50)
Corporate bonds and other securities			4,922			(77)			18,182			(419)			23,104			(496)			12,784			(786)			6,958			(542)			19,742			(1,328)
Total		$	4,922		$	(77)		$	42,090		$	(670)		$	47,012		$	(747)		$	15,291		$	(806)		$	9,600		$	(628)		$	24,891		$	(1,434

Total investment securities:

	December 31, 2018																			December 31, 2019
	Less than 12 months						12 months or longer						Total							Less than 12 months						12 months or longer						Total
	Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses				Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value			Unrealized Losses
US Agency		$	244		$	(6)		$	5,631		$	(154)		$	5,875		$	(160)			$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
US Agency mortgage-backed securities			17,718			(177)			39,983			(1,113)			57,701			(1,290)				7,084			(23)			8,562			(75)			15,646			(98)
Municipal			6,601			(71)			15,880			(567)			22,481			(638)				2,269			(18)			1,123			(52)			3,392			(70)
Corporate bonds and other securities			15,221			(440)			17,038			(678)			32,259			(1,118)				7,797			(85)			11,783			(243)			19,580			(328)
Total		$	39,784		$	(694)		$	78,532		$	(2,512)		$	118,316		$	(3,206)	��		$	17,150		$	(126)		$	21,468		$	(370)		$	38,618		$	(496)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The unrealized losses are primarily a result of increases in market yields from the time of purchase. In general, as market yields rise, the value of securities will decrease; as market yields fall, the fair value of securities will increase. There are 6534 positions that are considered temporarily impaired at ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. Management generally views changes in fair value caused by changes in interest rates as temporary; therefore, these securities have not been classified as other-than-temporarily impaired. Management has also concluded that based on current information we expect to continue to receive scheduled interest payments as well as the entire principal balance. Furthermore, management does not intend to sell these securities and does not believe it will be required to sell these securities before they recover in value or mature.

Contractual maturities of securities at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 are shown below (in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties. The weighted average duration of the total investment securities portfolio at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 is ~~37.2~~24.7 months and is lower than the duration at December 31, ~~2018~~2019 which was ~~44.1~~36.9 months. The duration remains within our internal established guideline range of 24 to 60 months which we believe is appropriate to maintain proper levels of liquidity, interest rate risk, market valuation sensitivity and profitability.

Total investment securities:

	June 30, 2019												March 31, 2020
	Available for sale						Held to maturity						Available for sale						Held to maturity
	Cost Basis			Fair Value			Cost Basis			Fair Value			Cost Basis			Fair Value			Cost Basis			Fair Value
Within 1 year		$	2,500		$	2,502		$	1,000		$	995		$	3,491		$	3,486		$	—		$	—
After 1 year but within 5 years			20,264			20,319			5,178			5,196			23,276			23,068			7,530			7,732
After 5 years but within 10 years			44,101			44,554			20,018			20,696			39,693			40,334			20,094			21,386
After 10 years but within 15 years			28,373			28,849			8,201			8,477			21,766			22,749			7,707			8,116
Over 15 years			54,080			54,864			5,355			5,411			51,149			53,079			6,737			7,002
Total		$	149,318		$	151,088		$	39,752		$	40,775		$	139,375		$	142,716		$	42,068		$	44,236

As of ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company reported ~~$328,000~~$386,000 and $366,000, respectively, of equity securities within ~~Other~~other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These equity securities are held within a nonqualified deferred compensation plan in which a select group of executives of the Company can participate. An eligible executive can defer a certain percentage of their current salary to be placed into the plan and held within a rabbi trust. The assets of the rabbi trust are invested in various publicly listed mutual funds. The gain or loss on the equity securities (both realized and unrealized) ~~will be~~is reported within ~~Other~~other income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For the first quarter of 2020, the Company recorded a realized gain of $6,000 and an unrealized loss of $6,000 was recognized in income on these equity securities. No gain or loss on equity securities (both realized and unrealized) was recognized during the first quarter of 2019. Additionally, the Company has recognized a deferred compensation liability, which is equal to the balance of the equity securities and is reported within ~~Other~~other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Loans

The loan portfolio of the Company consists of the following (in thousands):

	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Commercial: Commercial and industrial		$	172,428		$	158,279
Commercial:
Commercial and industrial								$	166,911		$	173,922
Commercial loans secured by owner occupied real estate			83,003			91,905			87,310			91,655
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			375,673			356,543			370,266			363,635
Real estate – residential mortgage			239,916			237,964			230,207			235,239
Consumer			17,737			17,591			17,955			18,255
Loans, net of unearned income		$	888,757		$	862,282		$	872,649		$	882,706

Loan balances at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 are net of unearned income of $406,000 and $384,000, respectively. Real estate construction loans comprised 5.4% and 4.9% of total loans, net of unearned income at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are not fully reflected in the Company’s first quarter operating results. Certain loans within our commercial and commercial real estate portfolios are expected to be disproportionately adversely affected by the pandemic. Due to mandatory lockdowns and travel restrictions, certain industries, such as hospitality, travel, food service and restaurants and bars, may suffer greater losses as a result of COVID-19. The following table provides information regarding our potential COVID-19 risk concentrations for commercial and commercial real estate loans by industry type at March 31, 2020 (in thousands).

	Commercial and industrial			Commercial loans secured by owner occupied real estate			Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			Total
1 – 4 unit residential		$	1,603		$	133		$	3,439		$	5,175
Multifamily/apartments/student housing			—			359			53,065			53,424
Office			37,929			10,280			38,218			86,427
Retail			4,129			21,333			108,763			134,225
Industrial/manufacturing/warehouse			101,464			17,698			40,115			159,277
Hotels			419			—			45,764			46,183
Eating and drinking places			887			4,434			597			5,918
Amusement and recreation			210			3,384			57			3,651
Mixed use			—			1,574			65,631			67,205
Other			20,270			28,115			14,617			63,002
Total		$	166,911		$	87,310		$	370,266		$	624,487

1112

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Loan balances at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 are net of unearned income of $413,000 and $322,000, respectively. Real estate-construction loans comprised 4.0% and 3.5% of total loans, net of unearned income at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

~~10.~~9.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The following tables summarize the rollforward of the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three ~~and six~~ month periods ending ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ (in thousands).

Three months ended June 30, 2019
Balance at
March 31, 2019 Charge-
Offs Recoveries Provision
(Credit) Balance at
June 30, 2019
Commercial $ 2,614 $ — $ — $ (76) $ 2,538
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate 3,373 — 13 39 3,425
Real estate – residential mortgage 1,213 (10) 68 (53) 1,218
Consumer 125 (88) 12 75 124
Allocation for general risk 782 — — 15 797
Total $ 8,107 $ (98) $ 93 $ — $ 8,102

Three months ended June 30, 2018
Balance at
March 31, 2018 Charge-
Offs Recoveries Provision
(Credit) Balance at
June 30, 2018
Commercial $ 3,984 $ (412) $ 4 $ (10) $ 3,566
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate 3,550 — 13 123 3,686
Real estate – residential mortgage 1,267 (103) 67 22 1,253
Consumer 142 (53) 23 13 125
Allocation for general risk 989 — — (98) 891
Total $ 9,932 $ (568) $ 107 $ 50 $ 9,521

Six months ended June 30, 2019
Balance at
December 31, 2018 Charge-
Offs Recoveries Provision
(Credit) Balance at
June 30, 2019
Commercial $ 3,057 $ — $ 5 $ (524) $ 2,538
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate 3,389 (63) 24 75 3,425
Real estate – residential mortgage 1,235 (71) 76 (22) 1,218
Consumer 127 (170) 30 137 124
Allocation for general risk 863 — — (66) 797
Total $ 8,671 $ (304) $ 135 $ (400) $ 8,102

Six months ended June 30, 2018
Balance at
December 31, 2017 Charge-
Offs Recoveries Provision
(Credit) Balance at
June 30, 2018
Commercial $ 4,298 $ (574) $ 12 $ (170) $ 3,566
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate 3,666 — 26 (6) 3,686
Real estate – residential mortgage 1,102 (217) 77 291 1,253
Consumer 128 (152) 35 114 125
Allocation for general risk 1,020 — — (129) 891
Total $ 10,214 $ (943) $ 150 $ 100 $ 9,521

	Three months ended March 31, 2020
	Balance at December 31, 2019			Charge- Offs			Recoveries			Provision (Credit)			Balance at March 31, 2020
Commercial		$	3,951		$	—		$	—		$	(91)		$	3,860
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			3,119			—			14			155			3,288
Real estate-residential mortgage			1,159			(92)			6			68			1,141
Consumer			126			(62)			14			42			120
Allocation for general risk			924			—			—			1			925
Total		$	9,279		$	(154)		$	34		$	175		$	9,334

	Three months ended March 31, 2019
	Balance at December 31, 2018			Charge- Offs			Recoveries			Provision (Credit)			Balance at March 31, 2019
Commercial		$	3,057		$	—		$	5		$	(448)		$	2,614
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			3,389			(63)			11			36			3,373
Real estate-residential mortgage			1,235			(61)			8			31			1,213
Consumer			127			(82)			18			62			125
Allocation for general risk			863			—			—			(81)			782
Total		$	8,671		$	(206)		$	42		$	(400)		$	8,107

The Company recorded a $175,000 provision expense for loan losses in the first quarter of 2020 compared to a $400,000 provision recovery in the first quarter of 2019. The 2020 provision reflects the loan growth experienced since last year along with our decision to strengthen certain qualitative factors within our allowance for loan losses calculation due to the economic uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. While future losses are possible due to the COVID-19 pandemic, losses were not incurred as of March 31, 2020 which is why the provision for the period isn’t higher. For the first three months of 2020, the Company experienced net loan charge-offs of $120,000, or 0.06% of total loans, compared to net loan charge-offs of $164,000, or 0.08% of total loans, in the first three months of 2019. Overall, the Company’s asset quality remains strong as its non-performing assets totaled $2.2 million, or only 0.26% of total loans, at March 31, 2020. The allowance for loan losses provided 416% coverage of non-performing assets, and 1.06% of total loans, at March 31, 2020, compared to 397% coverage of non-performing assets, and 1.05% of total loans, at December 31, 2019.

1213

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company did not record a provision for loan losses in the second quarter of 2019 as compared to a $50,000 provision recorded in the second quarter of 2018. For the first six months of 2019, the Company recorded a $400,000 loan loss provision recovery compared to a $100,000 provision expense recorded in the first six months of 2018. The 2019 provision recovery reflects our overall strong asset quality, reduced level of criticized loans and net loan charge-offs, and the lower six-month average loan portfolio balances. For the first six months of 2019, the Company experienced net loan charge-offs of $169,000, or 0.04% of total loans, compared to net loan charge-offs of $793,000, or 0.18% of total loans, in the first six months of 2018. Overall, the Company continued to maintain outstanding asset quality as its non-performing assets totaled $1.7 million, or only 0.19% of total loans, at June 30, 2019. The allowance for loan losses provided 482% coverage of non-performing assets, and 0.91% of total loans, at June 30, 2019, compared to 629% coverage of non-performing assets, and 1.00% of total loans, at December 31, 2018.

The following tables summarize the loan portfolio and allowance for loan loss by the primary segments of the loan portfolio (in thousands).

At June 30, 2019
Commercial Commercial Loans
Secured by Non-Owner
Occupied Real Estate Real Estate-
Residential
Mortgage Consumer Allocation for
General Risk Total
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 750 $ 10 $ — $ — $ 760
Collectively evaluated for impairment 254,681 375,663 239,916 17,737 887,997
Total loans $ 255,431 $ 375,673 $ 239,916 $ 17,737 $ 888,757
Allowance for loan losses:
Specific reserve allocation $ 78 $ 10 $ — $ — $ — $ 88
General reserve allocation 2,460 3,415 1,218 124 797 8,014
Total allowance for loan losses $ 2,538 $ 3,425 $ 1,218 $ 124 $ 797 $ 8,102

At December 31, 2018
Commercial Commercial Loans
Secured by Non-Owner
Occupied Real Estate Real Estate-
Residential
Mortgage Consumer Allocation for
General Risk Total
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment �� $ — $ 11 $ — $ — $ 11
Collectively evaluated for impairment 250,184 356,532 237,964 17,591 862,271
Total loans $ 250,184 $ 356,543 $ 237,964 $ 17,591 $ 862,282
Allowance for loan losses:
Specific reserve allocation $ — $ 11 $ — $ — $ — $ 11
General reserve allocation 3,057 3,378 1,235 127 863 8,660
Total allowance for loan losses $ 3,057 $ 3,389 $ 1,235 $ 127 $ 863 $ 8,671

	At March 31, 2020
	Commercial			Commercial Loans Secured by Non-Owner Occupied Real Estate			Real Estate- Residential Mortgage			Consumer			Allocation for General Risk			Total
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment		$	833		$	8		$	—		$	—					$	841
Collectively evaluated for impairment			253,388			370,258			230,207			17,955						871,808
Total loans		$	254,221		$	370,266		$	230,207		$	17,955					$	872,649
Allowance for loan losses:
Specific reserve allocation		$	79		$	8		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	87
General reserve allocation			3,781			3,280			1,141			120			925			9,247
Total allowance for loan losses		$	3,860		$	3,288		$	1,141		$	120		$	925		$	9,334

	At December 31, 2019
	Commercial			Commercial Loans Secured by Non-Owner Occupied Real Estate			Real Estate- Residential Mortgage			Consumer			Allocation for General Risk			Total
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment		$	816		$	8		$	—		$	—					$	824
Collectively evaluated for impairment			264,761			363,627			235,239			18,255						881,882
Total loans		$	265,577		$	363,635		$	235,239		$	18,255					$	882,706
Allowance for loan losses:
Specific reserve allocation		$	84		$	8		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	92
General reserve allocation			3,867			3,111			1,159			126			924			9,187
Total allowance for loan losses		$	3,951		$	3,119		$	1,159		$	126		$	924		$	9,279

The segments of the Company’s loan portfolio are disaggregated into classes that allows management to monitor risk and performance. The loan classes used are consistent with the internal reports evaluated by the Company’s management and Board of Directors to monitor risk and performance within various segments of its loan portfolio. The commercial loan segment includes both the commercial and industrial

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~AmeriServ Financial, Inc.~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

and the owner occupied commercial real estate loan classes while the remaining segments are not separated into classes as management monitors risk in these loans at the segment level. The residential mortgage loan segment is comprised of first lien amortizing residential mortgage loans and home equity loans secured by residential real estate. The consumer loan segment consists primarily of installment loans and overdraft lines of credit connected with customer deposit accounts.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Management evaluates for possible impairment any individual loan in the commercial or commercial real estate segment ~~with a loan balance in excess of $100,000~~ that is in nonaccrual status or classified as a Troubled Debt Restructure (TDR). In addition, consumer and residential mortgage loans with a balance of $150,000 or more are evaluated for impairment. Loans are considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in evaluating impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. The Company does not separately evaluate individual consumer and residential mortgage loans for impairment, unless such loans are part of a larger relationship that is impaired, or are classified as a TDR.

Once the determination has been made that a loan is impaired, the determination of whether a specific allocation of the allowance is necessary is measured by comparing the recorded investment in the loan to the fair value of the loan using one of three methods: (a) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; (b) the loan’s observable market price; or (c) the fair value of the collateral less selling costs for collateral dependent loans. The method is selected on a loan-by-loan basis, with management primarily utilizing the fair value of collateral method. The evaluation of the need and amount of a specific allocation of the allowance and whether a loan can be removed from impairment status is made on a quarterly basis. The Company’s policy for recognizing interest income on impaired loans does not differ from its overall policy for interest recognition.

The need for an updated appraisal on collateral dependent loans is determined on a case-by-case basis. The useful life of an appraisal or evaluation will vary depending upon the circumstances of the property and the economic conditions in the marketplace. A new appraisal is not required if there is an existing appraisal which, along with other information, is sufficient to determine a reasonable value for the property and to support an appropriate and adequate allowance for loan losses. At a minimum, annual documented reevaluation of the property is completed by the Bank’s internal Assigned Risk Department to support the value of the property.

When reviewing an appraisal associated with an existing real estate collateral dependent transaction, the Bank’s internal Assigned Risk Department must determine if there have been material changes to the underlying assumptions in the appraisal which affect the original estimate of value. Some of the factors that could cause material changes to reported values include:

•

the passage of time;

•

the volatility of the local market;

•

the availability of financing;

•

natural disasters;

•

the inventory of competing properties;

•

new improvements to, or lack of maintenance of, the subject property or competing properties upon physical inspection by the Bank;

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~AmeriServ Financial, Inc.~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

•

changes in underlying economic and market assumptions, such as material changes in current and projected vacancy, absorption rates, capitalization rates, lease terms, rental rates, sales prices, concessions, construction overruns and delays, zoning changes, etc.; and/or

•

environmental contamination.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The value of the property is adjusted to appropriately reflect the above listed factors and the value is discounted to reflect the value impact of a forced or distressed sale, any outstanding senior liens, any outstanding unpaid real estate taxes, transfer taxes and closing costs that would occur with sale of the real estate. If the Assigned Risk Department personnel determine that a reasonable value cannot be derived based on available information, a new appraisal is ordered. The determination of the need for a new appraisal, versus completion of a property valuation by the Bank’s Assigned Risk Department personnel, rests with the Assigned Risk Department and not the originating account officer.

The following tables present impaired loans by portfolio segment, segregated by those for which a specific allowance was required and those for which a specific allowance was not necessary (in thousands).

June 30, 2019
Impaired Loans with
Specific Allowance Impaired Loans with
no Specific Allowance Total Impaired Loans
Recorded
Investment Related
Allowance Recorded
Investment Recorded
Investment Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Commercial $ 750 $ 78 $ — $ 750 $ 750
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate 10 10 — 10 32
Total impaired loans $ 760 $ 88 $ — $ 760 $ 782

December 31, 2018
Impaired Loans with
Specific Allowance Impaired Loans with
no Specific Allowance Total Impaired Loans
Recorded
Investment Related
Allowance Recorded
Investment Recorded
Investment Unpaid
Principal
Balance
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate $ 11 $ 11 $ — $ 11 $ 33
Total impaired loans $ 11 $ 11 $ — $ 11 $ 33

	March 31, 2020
	Impaired Loans with Specific Allowance						Impaired Loans with no Specific Allowance			Total Impaired Loans
	Recorded Investment			Related Allowance			Recorded Investment			Recorded Investment			Unpaid Principal Balance
Commercial		$	833		$	79		$	—		$	833		$	833
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			8			8			—			8			30
Total impaired loans		$	841		$	87		$	—		$	841		$	863

	December 31, 2019
	Impaired Loans with Specific Allowance						Impaired Loans with no Specific Allowance			Total Impaired Loans
	Recorded Investment			Related Allowance			Recorded Investment			Recorded Investment			Unpaid Principal Balance
Commercial		$	816		$	84		$	—		$	816		$	816
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			8			8			—			8			30
Total impaired loans		$	824		$	92		$	—		$	824		$	846

The following table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related interest income recognized for the periods indicated (in thousands).

Three months ended
June 30, Six months ended
June 30,
2019 2018 2019 2018
Average loan balance:
Commercial $ 375 $ 457 $ 250 $ 709
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate 11 13 11 191
Average investment in impaired loans $ 386 $ 470 $ 261 $ 900
Interest income recognized:
Commercial $ 4 $ — $ 4 $ —
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate — — — —
Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans $ 4 $ — $ 4 $ —

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~AmeriServ Financial, Inc.~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

	Three months ended March 31,
	2020			2019
Average loan balance:
Commercial		$	825		$	—
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			8			11
Average investment in impaired loans		$	833		$	11
Interest income recognized:
Commercial		$	12		$	—
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			—			—
Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans		$	12		$	—

Management uses a nine-point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The first six categories are considered not criticized. The first five “Pass” categories are aggregated, while the Pass-6, Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful categories are disaggregated to

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

separate pools. The criticized rating categories utilized by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions. The Special Mention category includes assets that are currently protected but are potentially weak, resulting in an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a Substandard classification. Loans in the Substandard category have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt, and have a distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. All loans greater than 90 days past due, or for which any portion of the loan represents a specific allocation of the allowance for loan losses are placed in Substandard or Doubtful.

To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the Company has a structured loan rating process, which dictates that, at a minimum, credit reviews are mandatory for all commercial and commercial mortgage loan relationships with aggregate balances in excess of $1,000,000 within a 12-month period. Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the Pass categories unless a specific action, such as bankruptcy, delinquency, or death occurs to raise awareness of a possible credit event. The Company’s commercial relationship managers are responsible for the timely and accurate risk rating of the loans in their portfolios at origination and on an ongoing basis. Risk ratings are assigned by the account officer, but require independent review and rating concurrence from the Company’s internal Loan Review Department. The Loan Review Department is an experienced, independent function which reports directly to the Board’s Audit Committee. The scope of commercial portfolio coverage by the Loan Review Department is defined and presented to the Audit Committee for approval on an annual basis. The approved scope of coverage for ~~2019~~2020 requires review of a minimum ~~range~~ of ~~50% to 55%~~40% of the commercial loan portfolio.

In addition to loan monitoring by the account officer and Loan Review Department, the Company also requires presentation of all credits rated Pass-6 with aggregate balances greater than $2,000,000, all credits rated Special Mention or Substandard with aggregate balances greater than $250,000, and all credits rated Doubtful with aggregate balances greater than $100,000 on an individual basis to the Company’s Loan Loss Reserve Committee on a quarterly basis. Additionally, the Asset Quality Task Force, which is a group comprised of senior level personnel, meets monthly to monitor the status of problem loans.

The following table presents the classes of the commercial and commercial real estate loan portfolios summarized by the aggregate Pass and the criticized categories of Special Mention, Substandard and Doubtful within the internal risk rating system (in thousands).

June 30, 2019
Pass Special
Mention Substandard Doubtful Total
Commercial and industrial $ 167,272 $ 3,471 $ 1,685 $ — $ 172,428
Commercial loans secured by owner occupied real
estate 80,162 1,679 1,162 — 83,003
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied
real estate 369,242 6,234 187 10 375,673
Total $ 616,676 $ 11,384 $ 3,034 $ 10 $ 631,104

	March 31, 2020
	Pass			Special Mention			Substandard			Doubtful			Total
Commercial and industrial		$	154,456		$	790		$	11,665		$	—		$	166,911
Commercial loans secured by owner occupied real estate			84,661			1,345			1,304			—			87,310
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			368,681			—			1,577			8			370,266
Total		$	607,798		$	2,135		$	14,546		$	8		$	624,487

	December 31, 2019
	Pass			Special Mention			Substandard			Doubtful			Total
Commercial and industrial		$	161,147		$	853		$	11,922		$	—		$	173,922
Commercial loans secured by owner occupied real estate			88,942			1,384			1,329			—			91,655
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			362,027			—			1,600			8			363,635
Total		$	612,116		$	2,237		$	14,851		$	8		$	629,212

1617

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2018
Pass Special
Mention Substandard Doubtful Total
Commercial and industrial $ 154,510 $ 2,089 $ 1,680 $ — $ 158,279
Commercial loans secured by owner occupied real
estate 86,997 3,769 1,139 — 91,905
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied
real estate 349,954 6,316 262 11 356,543
Total $ 591,461 $ 12,174 $ 3,081 $ 11 $ 606,727

It is generally the policy of the Bank that the outstanding balance of any residential mortgage loan that exceeds 90-days past due as to principal and/or interest is transferred to non-accrual status and an evaluation is completed to determine the fair value of the collateral less selling costs, unless the balance is minor. A charge down is recorded for any deficiency balance determined from the collateral evaluation. The remaining non-accrual balance is reported as impaired with no specific allowance. It is generally the policy of the Bank that the outstanding balance of any consumer loan that exceeds 90-days past due as to principal and/or interest is charged off. The following tables present the performing and non-performing outstanding balances of the residential and consumer portfolio classes (in thousands).

June 30, 2019
Performing Non-Performing
Real estate – residential mortgage $ 239,052 $ 864
Consumer 17,737 —
Total $ 256,789 $ 864

December 31, 2018
Performing Non-Performing
Real estate – residential mortgage $ 236,754 $ 1,210
Consumer 17,591 —
Total $ 254,345 $ 1,210

	March 31, 2020
	Performing			Non-Performing			Total
Real estate – residential mortgage		$	228,803		$	1,404		$	230,207
Consumer			17,955			—			17,955
Total		$	246,758		$	1,404		$	248,162

	December 31, 2019
	Performing			Non-Performing			Total
Real estate – residential mortgage		$	233,760		$	1,479		$	235,239
Consumer			18,255			—			18,255
Total		$	252,015		$	1,479		$	253,494

Management further monitors the performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio by analyzing the age of the portfolio as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aging categories of performing loans and ~~nonaccrual~~non-accrual loans (in thousands).

	June 30, 2019																					March 31, 2020
	Current			30 – 59 Days Past Due			60 – 89 Days Past Due			90 Days Past Due			Total Past Due			Total Loans			90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing			Current			30 – 59 Days Past Due			60 – 89 Days Past Due			90 Days Past Due			Total Past Due			Total Loans			90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing
Commercial and industrial		$	172,428		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	172,428		$	—		$	160,550		$	6,361		$	—		$	—		$	6,361		$	166,911		$	—
Commercial loans secured by owner occupied real estate			83,003			—			—			—			—			83,003			—			87,197			113			—			—			113			87,310			—
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			375,673			—			—			—			—			375,673			—			370,266			—			—			—			—			370,266			—
Real estate – residential mortgage			235,940			2,723			779			474			3,976			239,916			—			226,532			1,445			1,259			971			3,675			230,207			—
Consumer			17,508			220			9			—			229			17,737			—			17,901			42			12			—			54			17,955			—
Total		$	884,552		$	2,943		$	788		$	474		$	4,205		$	888,757		$	—		$	862,446		$	7,961		$	1,271		$	971		$	10,203		$	872,649		$	—

1718

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	December 31, 2018																					December 31, 2019
	Current			30 – 59 Days Past Due			60 – 89 Days Past Due			90 Days Past Due			Total Past Due			Total Loans			90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing			Current			30 – 59 Days Past Due			60 – 89 Days Past Due			90 Days Past Due			Total Past Due			Total Loans			90 Days Past Due and Still Accruing
Commercial and industrial		$	158,279		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	158,279		$	—		$	173,922		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	173,922		$	—
Commercial loans secured by owner occupied real estate			91,905			—			—			—			—			91,905			—			91,538			117			—			—			117			91,655			—
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			355,963			580			—			—			580			356,543			—			363,635			—			—			—			—			363,635			—
Real estate – residential mortgage			232,465			3,651			472			1,376			5,499			237,964			—			231,022			2,331			864			1,022			4,217			235,239			—
Consumer			17,408			153			30			—			183			17,591			—			18,190			42			23			—			65			18,255			—
Total		$	856,020		$	4,384		$	502		$	1,376		$	6,262		$	862,282		$	—		$	878,307		$	2,490		$	887		$	1,022		$	4,399		$	882,706		$	—

The Company experienced an increase in loan delinquency during the first quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily due to the unexpected death of a borrower late in 2019, which was previously reported in our Form 10-K dated December 31, 2019. The estate, which is made up of significant real estate holdings and other unique assets, is currently in the process of liquidation. Therefore, this $6.3 million commercial and industrial loan exhibited delinquency during the quarter.

An allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) is maintained to support loan growth and cover charge-offs from the loan portfolio. The ALL is based on management’s continuing evaluation of the risk characteristics and credit quality of the loan portfolio, assessment of current economic conditions, diversification and size of the portfolio, adequacy of collateral, past and anticipated loss experience, and the amount of non-performing loans.

Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are analyzed with general allowances being made as appropriate. For general allowances, historical loss trends are used in the estimation of losses in the current portfolio. These historical loss amounts are complemented by consideration of other qualitative factors.

Management tracks the historical net charge-off activity at each risk rating grade level for the entire commercial portfolio and at the aggregate level for the consumer, residential mortgage and small business portfolios. A historical charge-off factor is calculated utilizing a rolling 12 consecutive historical quarters for the commercial portfolios. This historical charge-off factor for the consumer, residential mortgage and small business portfolios are based on a three-year historical average of actual loss experience.

The Company uses a comprehensive methodology and procedural discipline to maintain an ALL to absorb inherent losses in the loan portfolio. The Company believes this is a critical accounting policy since it involves significant estimates and judgments. The allowance consists of three elements: 1)(1) an allowance established on specifically identified problem loans, 2)(2) formula driven general reserves established for loan categories based upon historical loss experience and other qualitative factors which include delinquency, non-performing and TDR loans, loan trends, economic trends, concentrations of credit, trends in loan volume, experience and depth of management, examination and audit results, effects of any changes in lending policies, and trends in policy, financial information, and documentation exceptions, and 3)(3) a general risk reserve which provides support for variance from our assessment of the previously listed qualitative factors, provides protection against credit risks resulting from other inherent risk factors contained in the Company’s loan portfolio, and recognizes the model and estimation risk associated with the specific and formula driven allowances. The qualitative factors used in the formula driven general reserves are evaluated quarterly (and revised if necessary) by the Company’s management to establish allocations which accommodate each of the listed risk factors.

“Pass” rated credits are segregated from “Criticized” and “Classified” credits for the application of qualitative factors.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Management reviews the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis using a defined, consistently applied process in order to make appropriate and timely adjustments to the ALL. When information confirms all or part of specific loans to be uncollectible, these amounts are promptly charged off against the ALL.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~AmeriServ Financial, Inc.~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~11.~~10.

~~Non-performing~~Non-Performing Assets Including Troubled Debt Restructurings (TDR)

The following table presents information concerning non-performing assets including TDR (in thousands, except percentages):

	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Non-accrual loans
Commercial and industrial								$	25		$	—
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate		$	10		$	11			8			8
Real estate – residential mortgage			864			1,210			1,404			1,479
Total			874			1,221			1,437			1,487
Other real estate owned
Commercial loans secured by owner occupied real estate			—			157
Real estate – residential mortgage			57			—
Real estate-residential mortgage									—			37
Total			57			157			—			37
TDR’s not in non-accrual
Commercial and industrial			750			—			807			815
Total			750			—			807			815
Total non-performing assets including TDR		$	1,681		$	1,378		$	2,244		$	2,339
Total non-performing assets as a percent of loans, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned			0.19%			0.16%			0.26%			0.26%

The Company had no loans past due 90 days or more for the periods presented which were accruing interest.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, (1) the gross interest income that would have been recorded if non-accrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination if held for part of the period, (2) the amount of interest income actually recorded on such loans, and (3) the net reduction in interest income attributable to such loans (in thousands).

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019
Interest income due in accordance
with original terms		$	14		$	22		$	29		$	49
Interest income due in accordance with original terms														$	17		$	15
Interest income recorded			—			—			—			—			—			—
Net reduction in interest income		$	14		$	22		$	29		$	49		$	17		$	15

Consistent with accounting and regulatory guidance, the Bank recognizes a TDR when the Bank, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the borrower that would not normally be considered. Regardless of the form of concession granted, the Bank’s objective in offering a TDR is to increase the probability of repayment of the borrower’s loan.

The Company had no loans modified as TDRs during the three month periods ending March 31, 2020 and 2019.

1920

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~The following table details the loan modified as a TDR during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2019 (dollars in thousands).~~

Loans in accrual status # of Loans Current Balance Concession Granted
Commercial and industrial 1 $ 750 Extension of maturity date with
a below market interest rate

~~The Company had no loans modified as TDR’s during the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2018.~~

All ~~TDR’s~~TDRs are individually evaluated for impairment and a related allowance is recorded, as needed. The specific ALL reserve for loans modified as ~~TDR’s~~TDRs was ~~$88,000~~$85,000 and ~~$11,000~~$92,000 as of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

The Company had no loans that were classified as ~~TDR’s~~TDRs or were subsequently modified during each 12-month period prior to the current reporting periods, which begin January 1, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017 (six month periods) and April 1,~~ 2018, ~~and 2017 (three month periods),~~ respectively, and that subsequently defaulted during these reporting periods.

The Company is unaware of any additional loans which are required to either be charged-off or added to the non-performing asset totals disclosed above.

~~12.~~11.

Federal Home Loan Bank Borrowings

Total Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) borrowings and advances consist of the following (in thousands, except percentages):

At June 30, 2019
Type Maturing Amount Weighted
Average Rate
Open Repo Plus Overnight $ 35,190 2.46%
Advances 2019 10,500 1.53
2020 16,729 1.74
2021 9,496 2.28
2022 9,831 2.68
2023 5,568 2.48
2024 and over 1,000 2.26
Total advances 53,124 2.06
Total FHLB borrowings $ 88,314 2.22%

At December 31, 2018
Type Maturing Amount Weighted
Average Rate
Open Repo Plus Overnight $ 41,029 2.62%
Advances 2019 12,500 1.51
2020 16,729 1.74
2021 9,496 2.28
2022 6,996 2.86
2023 1,000 2.86
Total advances 46,721 1.98
Total FHLB borrowings $ 87,750 2.28%

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~AmeriServ Financial, Inc.~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

	At March 31, 2020
Type	Maturing	Amount			Weighted Average Rate
Open Repo Plus	Overnight		$	16,354		0.36%
Advances	2020			12,229		1.74
	2021			9,496		2.28
	2022			20,888		2.03
	2023			13,568		1.76
	2024			2,037		1.86
Total advances				58,218		1.94
Total FHLB borrowings			$	74,572		1.59%

	At December 31, 2019
Type	Maturing	Amount			Weighted Average Rate
Open Repo Plus	Overnight		$	22,412		1.81%
Advances	2020			18,729		1.75
	2021			9,496		2.28
	2022			17,838		2.21
	2023			5,568		2.48
	2024			2,037		1.86
Total advances				53,668		2.08
Total FHLB borrowings			$	76,080		2.00%

The rate on Open Repo Plus advances can change daily, while the rates on the advances are fixed until the maturity of the advance. All FHLB stock along with an interest in certain residential mortgage, commercial real estate, and commercial and industrial loans with an aggregate statutory value equal to the amount of the advances are pledged as collateral to the FHLB of Pittsburgh to support these borrowings.

~~13.~~12.

Lease Commitments

~~Due to the adoption of ASU 2016-02,~~ ~~Leases (Topic 842), the~~The Company ~~completed a comprehensive review and analysis of all its property and equipment contracts. As a result of this review, it was determined that the Company leases eight office locations under both~~has operating and financing leases for several office locations and ~~one copy machine under a short-term lease.~~equipment. Several assumptions and judgments were made when applying the requirements of ~~Topic 842~~ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) to the Company’s ~~existing~~ lease commitments, including the allocation of consideration in the contracts between lease and ~~nonlease~~non-lease components, determination of the lease term, and determination of the discount rate used in calculating the present value of the lease payments.

~~The Company has elected to account for the variable nonlease~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Many of our leases include both lease (e.g., minimum rent payments) and non-lease components, such as common area maintenance charges, utilities, real estate taxes, and ~~insurance,~~insurance. The Company has elected to account for the variable non-lease components separately from the lease component. Such variable ~~nonlease~~non-lease components are reported in net occupancy expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations when ~~paid.~~incurred. These variable ~~nonlease~~non-lease components were excluded from the calculation of the present value of the remaining lease payments, therefore, they are not included in the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table presents the lease cost associated with both operating and financing leases for the three ~~and six~~ month periods ending ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands). ~~Total rent expense recorded during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018 was $98,000 and $215,000, respectively.~~

	Three months ended June 30, 2019			Six months ended June 30, 2019			Three months ended March 31, 2020			Three months ended March 31, 2019
Lease cost
Financing lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use asset		$	65		$	129		$	67		$	64
Interest expense			29			59			29			30
Operating lease cost			29			58			29			29
Total lease cost		$	123		$	246		$	125		$	123

Certain of the Company’s leases contain options to renew the lease after the initial term. Management considers the Company’s historical pattern of exercising renewal options on leases and the performance of the leased locations, when determining whether it is reasonably certain that the leases will be renewed. If management concludes that there is reasonable certainty about the renewal option, it is included in the calculation of the remaining term of each applicable lease. The discount rate utilized in calculating the present value of the remaining lease payments for each lease was the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh advance rate corresponding to the remaining maturity of the lease. The following table presents the weighted-average remaining lease term and discount rate for the leases outstanding at ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

Operating Financing
Weighted-average remaining term (years) 12.2 17.4
Weighted-average discount rate 3.44% 3.59%

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~AmeriServ Financial, Inc.~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

	March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019
	Operating		Financing		Operating		Financing
Weighted-average remaining term (years)		11.7		16.7		11.9		17.1
Weighted-average discount rate		3.46%		3.57%		3.46%		3.60%

The following table presents the undiscounted cash flows due related to operating and financing leases, ~~as of June 30, 2019,~~ along with a reconciliation to the discounted amount recorded on the Consolidated Balance ~~Sheets.~~Sheets (in thousands).

							March 31, 2020
	Operating			Financing			Operating			Financing
Undiscounted cash flows due:
Within 1 year		$	117		$	299		$	118		$	302
After 1 year but within 2 years			119			282			120			289
After 2 years but within 3 years			117			276			85			291
After 3 years but within 4 years			75			278			69			276
After 4 years but within 5 years			69			251			69			251
After 5 years			624			3,126			573			2,943
Total undiscounted cash flows			1,121			4,512			1,034			4,352
Discount on cash flows			(214)			(1,259)			(192)			(1,175)
Total lease liabilities		$	907		$	3,253		$	842		$	3,177

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	December 31, 2019
	Operating			Financing
Undiscounted cash flows due:
Within 1 year		$	118		$	296
After 1 year but within 2 years			120			275
After 2 years but within 3 years			98			277
After 3 years but within 4 years			69			274
After 4 years but within 5 years			69			236
After 5 years			589			3,007
Total undiscounted cash flows			1,063			4,365
Discount on cash flows			(198)			(1,202)
Total lease liabilities		$	865		$	3,163

Under Topic 842, the lessee can elect to not record on the Consolidated Balance Sheets a lease whose term is twelve months or less and does not include a purchase option that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise. As of ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company had one short-term equipment lease which it has elected to not record on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

~~14.~~13.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The following table presents the changes in each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ (in thousands):

	Three months ended June 30, 2019									Three months ended June 30, 2018									Three months ended March 31, 2020									Three months ended March 31, 2019
	Net Unrealized Gains and (Losses) on Investment Securities AFS(1)			Defined Benefit Pension Items(1)			Total(1)			Net Unrealized Gains and (Losses) on Investment Securities AFS(1)			Defined Benefit Pension Items(1)			Total(1)			Net Unrealized Gains and (Losses) on Investment Securities AFS(1)			Defined Benefit Pension Items(1)			Total(1)			Net Unrealized Gains and (Losses) on Investment Securities AFS(1)			Defined Benefit Pension Items(1)			Total(1)
Beginning balance		$	(16)		$	(14,266)		$	(14,282)		$	(1,526)		$	(11,798)		$	(13,324)		$	1,715		$	(17,886)		$	(16,171)		$	(1,409)		$	(12,816)		$	(14,225)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications			1,438			29			1,467			(651)			3			(648)			924			(95)			829			1,393			(1,739)			(346)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss			(24)			289			265			—			305			305			—			512			512			—			289			289
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)			1,414			318			1,732			(651)			308			(343)			924			417			1,341			1,393			(1,450)			(57)
Ending balance		$	1,398		$	(13,948)		$	(12,550)		$	(2,177)		$	(11,490)		$	(13,667)		$	2,639		$	(17,469)		$	(14,830)		$	(16)		$	(14,266)		$	(14,282)

(1)

Amounts in parentheses indicate debits on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

2223

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Six months ended
June 30, 2019 Six months ended
June 30, 2018

Net
Unrealized
Gains and
(Losses) on
Investment
Securities
AFS(1)

Defined
Benefit
Pension
Items(1)

Total(1)

Net
Unrealized
Gains and
(Losses) on
Investment
Securities
AFS(1)

Defined
Benefit
Pension
Items(1)

Total(1)

Beginning balance $ (1,409) $ (12,816) $ (14,225) $ (327) $ (12,623) $ (12,950)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications 2,831 (1,710) 1,121 (1,967) 616 (1,351)
Amounts reclassified from
accumulated other comprehensive
loss (24) 578 554 117 517 634
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) 2,807 (1,132) 1,675 (1,850) 1,133 (717)
Ending balance $ 1,398 $ (13,948) $ (12,550) $ (2,177) $ (11,490) $ (13,667)

~~(1)~~

~~Amounts in parentheses indicate debits on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.~~

The following table presents the amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ (in thousands):

	Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss(1)							Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss(1)
Details about accumulated other comprehensive loss components	For the three months ended June 30, 2019			For the three months ended June 30, 2018			Affected line item in the consolidated statement of operations	For the three months ended March 31, 2020			For the three months ended March 31, 2019			Affected line item in the consolidated statement of operations
Realized gains on sale of securities		$	(30)		$	—	Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities		$	—		$	—	Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities
			6			—	Provision for income tax expense			—			—	Provision for income tax expense
		$	(24)		$	—	Net of tax		$	—		$	—	Net of tax
Amortization of estimated defined benefit pension plan loss		$	366		$	386	Other expense
Amortization of estimated defined benefit pension plan loss(2)									$	648		$	366	Other expense
			(77)			(81)	Provision for income tax expense			(136)			(77)	Provision for income tax expense
		$	289		$	305	Net of tax		$	512		$	289	Net of tax
Total reclassifications for the period		$	265		$	305	Net income		$	512		$	289	Net income

(1)

~~Amounts in parentheses indicate credits.~~

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~AmeriServ Financial, Inc.~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

Amount reclassified from accumulated
other comprehensive loss(1)

Details about accumulated other comprehensive loss
components For the six
months ended
June 30, 2019 For the six
months ended
June 30, 2018 Affected line item in
the consolidated statement of
operations
Realized (gains) losses on sale of
securities $ (30) $ 148 Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities
6 (31) Provision for income tax expense
$ (24) $ 117 Net of tax
Amortization of estimated defined benefit
pension plan loss $ 732 $ 654 Other expense
(154) (137) Provision for income tax expense
$ 578 $ 517 Net of tax
Total reclassifications for the period $ 554 $ 634 Net income

~~(1)~~

Amounts in parentheses indicate credits.

~~15.~~(2)

These accumulated other comprehensive loss components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost (see Note 18 for additional details).

14.

Regulatory Capital

The Company is subject to various capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. For a more detailed discussion see the Capital Resources section of ~~the M.D. & A.~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A).

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total, common equity tier 1, and tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (as defined), and tier 1 capital to average ~~assets, and common equity tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted~~ assets. Additionally, under Basel III rules, the decision was made to opt-out of including accumulated other comprehensive income in regulatory capital. As of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the Bank was categorized as ~~“Well Capitalized”~~“well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action promulgated by the Federal Reserve. The Company believes that no conditions or events have occurred that would change this conclusion as of such date. To be categorized as ~~Well Capitalized,~~well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum ~~Total Capital, Common Equity Tier~~total capital, common equity tier 1 ~~Capital, Tier~~capital, tier 1 ~~Capital,~~capital, and ~~Tier~~tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table (in thousands, except ratios).

At June 30, 2019
COMPANY BANK MINIMUM
REQUIRED
FOR CAPITAL
ADEQUACY
PURPOSES TO BE WELL
CAPITALIZED
UNDER PROMPT
CORRECTIVE
ACTION
REGULATIONS*
AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO RATIO RATIO
Total Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets) $ 130,532 13.14% $ 117,702 11.91% 8.00% 10.00%
Common Equity Tier 1 (To Risk Weighted Assets) 102,082 10.28 108,631 10.99 4.50 6.50
Tier 1 Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets) 113,962 11.47 108,631 10.99 6.00 8.00
Tier 1 Capital (To Average Assets) 113,962 9.73 108,631 9.40 4.00 5.00

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

At December 31, 2018
COMPANY BANK MINIMUM
REQUIRED
FOR CAPITAL
ADEQUACY
PURPOSES TO BE WELL
CAPITALIZED
UNDER PROMPT
CORRECTIVE
ACTION
REGULATIONS*
AMOUNT RATIO AMOUNT RATIO RATIO RATIO
Total Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets) $ 129,178 13.53% $ 115,451 12.14% 8.00% 10.00%
Common Equity Tier 1 (To Risk Weighted Assets) 100,258 10.50 105,891 11.14 4.50 6.50
Tier 1 Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets) 112,130 11.74 105,891 11.14 6.00 8.00
Tier 1 Capital (To Average Assets) 112,130 9.71 105,891 9.28 4.00 5.00

	At March 31, 2020
	COMPANY					BANK					MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR CAPITAL ADEQUACY PURPOSES		TO BE WELL CAPITALIZED UNDER PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION REGULATIONS*
	AMOUNT			RATIO		AMOUNT			RATIO		RATIO		RATIO
Total Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)		$	133,286		13.41%		$	120,917		12.23%		8.00%		10.00%
Common Equity Tier 1 (To Risk Weighted Assets)			103,726		10.44			110,766		11.20		4.50		6.50
Tier 1 Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)			115,618		11.64			110,766		11.20		6.00		8.00
Tier 1 Capital (To Average Assets)			115,618		9.94			110,766		9.64		4.00		5.00

	At December 31, 2019
	COMPANY					BANK					MINIMUM REQUIRED FOR CAPITAL ADEQUACY PURPOSES		TO BE WELL CAPITALIZED UNDER PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION REGULATIONS*
	AMOUNT			RATIO		AMOUNT			RATIO		RATIO		RATIO
Total Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)		$	132,544		13.49%		$	119,477		12.23%		8.00%		10.00%
Common Equity Tier 1 (To Risk Weighted Assets)			102,841		10.47			109,173		11.17		4.50		6.50
Tier 1 Capital (To Risk Weighted Assets)			114,729		11.68			109,173		11.17		6.00		8.00
Tier 1 Capital (To Average Assets)			114,729		9.87			109,173		9.50		4.00		5.00

Applies to the Bank only.

Additionally, while not a regulatory capital ratio, the Company’s tangible common equity ratio was ~~7.60%~~7.69% (non-GAAP) at ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. See the discussion of the tangible common equity ratio under the ~~“Balance Sheet”~~Balance Sheet section of ~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (M.D. & A.).~~the MD&A.

~~16.~~15.

Derivative Hedging Instruments

The Company can use various interest rate contracts, such as interest rate swaps, caps, floors and swaptions to help manage interest rate and market valuation risk exposure, which is incurred in normal recurrent banking activities. The Company can use derivative instruments, primarily interest rate swaps, to manage interest rate risk and match the rates on certain assets by hedging the fair value of certain fixed rate debt, which converts the debt to variable rates and by hedging the cash flow variability associated with certain variable rate debt by converting the debt to fixed rates.

To accommodate the needs of our customers and support the Company’s asset/liability positioning, we may enter into interest rate swap agreements with customers and a large financial institution that specializes in these types of transactions. These arrangements involve the exchange of interest payments based on the notional amounts. The Company entered into floating rate loans and fixed rate swaps with our customers.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Simultaneously, the Company entered into offsetting fixed rate swaps with Pittsburgh National Bank (PNC). In connection with each swap transaction, the Company agrees to pay interest to the customer on a notional amount at a variable interest rate and receive interest from the customer on the same notional amount at a fixed interest rate. At the same time, the Company agrees to pay PNC the same fixed interest rate on the same notional amount and receive the same variable interest rate on the same notional amount. These transactions allow the Company’s customers to effectively convert a variable rate loan to a fixed rate. Because the Company acts as an intermediary for its customers, changes in the fair value of the underlying derivative contracts offset each other and do not significantly impact the Company’s results of operations.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~AmeriServ Financial, Inc.~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~
These swaps are considered free-standing derivatives and are reported at fair value within other assets and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Disclosures related to the fair value of the swap transactions can be found in Note 19.

The following table summarizes the interest rate swap transactions that impacted the Company’s first ~~six~~three months of ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 performance (in thousands, except percentages).

At June 30, 2019
HEDGE
TYPE AGGREGATE
NOTIONAL
AMOUNT WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
RATE
RECEIVED/(PAID) REPRICING
FREQUENCY INCREASE
(DECREASE) IN
INTEREST
EXPENSE
SWAP ASSETS FAIR VALUE $ 22,628 4.78% MONTHLY $ 16
SWAP LIABILITIES FAIR VALUE (22,628) (4.78) MONTHLY (16)
NET EXPOSURE — — —

At June 30, 2018
HEDGE
TYPE AGGREGATE
NOTIONAL
AMOUNT WEIGHTED
AVERAGE
RATE
RECEIVED/(PAID) REPRICING
FREQUENCY INCREASE
(DECREASE) IN
INTEREST
EXPENSE
SWAP ASSETS FAIR VALUE $ 16,681 4.04% MONTHLY $ (33)
SWAP LIABILITIES FAIR VALUE (16,681) (4.04) MONTHLY 33
NET EXPOSURE — — —

	At March 31, 2020
	HEDGE TYPE	AGGREGATE NOTIONAL AMOUNT			WEIGHTED AVERAGE RATE RECEIVED/(PAID)		REPRICING FREQUENCY	INCREASE (DECREASE) IN INTEREST EXPENSE
SWAP ASSETS	FAIR VALUE		$	33,037		3.93%	MONTHLY		$	(45)
SWAP LIABILITIES	FAIR VALUE			(33,037)		(3.93)	MONTHLY			45
NET EXPOSURE				—		—				—

	At March 31, 2019
	HEDGE TYPE	AGGREGATE NOTIONAL AMOUNT			WEIGHTED AVERAGE RATE RECEIVED/(PAID)		REPRICING FREQUENCY	INCREASE (DECREASE) IN INTEREST EXPENSE
SWAP ASSETS	FAIR VALUE		$	21,745		4.79%	MONTHLY		$	9
SWAP LIABILITIES	FAIR VALUE			(21,745)		(4.79)	MONTHLY			(9)
NET EXPOSURE				—		—				—

The Company monitors and controls all derivative products with a comprehensive Board of ~~Director~~Directors approved Hedging Policy. This policy permits a total maximum notional amount outstanding of $500 million for interest rate swaps, interest rate caps/floors, and swaptions. All hedge transactions must be approved in advance by the Investment Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) of the Board of Directors, unless otherwise approved, as per the terms, within the Board of Directors approved Hedging Policy. The Company had no caps or floors outstanding at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. None of the Company’s derivatives are designated as hedging instruments.

~~17.~~16.

Segment Results

The financial performance of the Company is also monitored by an internal funds transfer pricing profitability measurement system which produces line of business results and key performance measures. The Company’s major business units include ~~retail banking, commercial~~community banking, wealth management, and investment/parent. The reported results reflect the underlying economics of the business segments. Expenses for centrally provided services are allocated based upon the cost and estimated usage of those services. The businesses are match-funded and interest rate risk is centrally managed and accounted for within the investment/parent business segment. The key performance measure the Company focuses on for each business segment is net income contribution.

The community banking segment includes both retail and commercial banking activities. Retail banking includes the deposit-gathering branch franchise and lending to both individuals and small businesses. Lending activities include residential mortgage loans, direct consumer loans, and small business

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

commercial loans. Commercial banking to businesses includes commercial loans, business services, and CRE loans. The wealth management segment includes the Trust Company, West Chester Capital Advisors (WCCA), our registered investment advisory firm, and Financial Services. Wealth management activities include personal trust products and services such as personal portfolio investment management, estate planning and administration, custodial services and pre-need trusts. Also, institutional trust products and services such as 401(k) plans, defined benefit and defined contribution employee benefit plans, and individual retirement accounts are included in this segment. Financial Services include the sale of mutual funds, annuities, and insurance products. The wealth management businesses also include the union collective investment funds, primarily the ERECT funds which are designed to use union pension dollars in construction projects that utilize union labor. The investment/parent includes the net results of investment securities and borrowing activities, general corporate expenses not allocated to the business segments, interest expense on corporate debt, and centralized interest rate risk management. Inter-segment revenues were not material.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~AmeriServ Financial, Inc.~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

The contribution of the major business segments to the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ were as follows (in thousands):

Three months ended
June 30, 2019 Six months ended
June 30, 2019
Total
revenue Net
income (loss) Total
revenue Net
income (loss)
Retail banking $ 6,859 $ 1,176 $ 13,533 $ 2,357
Commercial banking 4,676 1,706 9,095 3,473
Wealth management 2,440 444 4,857 888
Investment/Parent (1,257) (1,534) (2,505) (3,048)
Total $ 12,718 $ 1,792 $ 24,980 $ 3,670

Three months ended
June 30, 2018 Six months ended
June 30, 2018
Total
revenue Net
income (loss) Total
revenue Net
income (loss)
Retail banking $ 6,220 $ 754 $ 12,358 $ 1,460
Commercial banking 4,512 1,640 8,967 3,200
Wealth management 2,466 432 4,909 940
Investment/Parent (659) (1,082) (1,312) (2,089)
Total $ 12,539 $ 1,744 $ 24,922 $ 3,511

	Three months ended March 31, 2020
	Total revenue			Net income (loss)
Community banking		$	11,448		$	2,524
Wealth management			2,568			487
Investment/Parent			(1,433)			(1,602)
Total		$	12,583		$	1,409

	Three months ended March 31, 2019
	Total revenue			Net income (loss)
Community banking		$	11,093		$	2,948
Wealth management			2,417			444
Investment/Parent			(1,248)			(1,514)
Total		$	12,262		$	1,878

~~18.~~

17.

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

The Company had various outstanding commitments to extend credit approximating ~~$227.6~~$217.5 million and ~~$177.8~~$195.5 million along with standby letters of credit of ~~$16.3~~$14.1 million and ~~$16.7~~$14.7 million as of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to these commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by their contractual amounts. The Bank uses the same credit and collateral policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for all other lending.

Additionally, the Company is also subject to a number of asserted and unasserted potential claims encountered in the normal course of business. In the opinion of the Company, neither the resolution of these claims nor the funding of these credit commitments will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~19.~~18.

Pension Benefits

The Company has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering certain employees who work at least 1,000 hours per year. The participants have a vested interest in their accrued benefit after five full years of service. The benefits of the plan are based upon the employee’s years of service and average annual earnings for the highest five consecutive calendar years during the final ten-year period of employment. Plan assets are primarily debt securities (including US Treasury and Agency securities, corporate notes and bonds), listed common stocks (including shares of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. common stock which is limited to 10% of the plan’s assets), mutual funds, and short-term cash equivalent instruments. The net periodic pension cost for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ were as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost		$	374		$	409		$	748		$	818		$	441		$	374
Interest cost			402			303			804			606			319			402
Expected return on plan assets			(762)			(711)			(1,524)			(1,422)			(817)			(762)
Recognized net actuarial loss			366			386			732			772			648			366
Net periodic pension cost		$	380		$	387		$	760		$	774		$	591		$	380

The service cost component of net periodic benefit cost is included in ~~“Salaries~~��Salaries and employee benefits” and all other components of net periodic benefit cost are included in “Other expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company implemented a soft freeze of its defined benefit pension plan to provide that non-union employees hired on or after January 1, 2013 and union employees hired on or after January 1, 2014 are not eligible to participate in the pension plan. Instead, such employees are eligible to participate in a qualified 401(k) plan. This change was made to help reduce pension costs in future periods.

~~20.~~19.

Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements and Financial Instruments

The following disclosures establish a hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observability utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three broad levels defined within this hierarchy are as follows:

Level I: Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.

Level II: Pricing inputs are other than the quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities includes items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently and items that are fair-valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.

Level III: Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Assets and Liability Measured and Recorded on a Recurring Basis

Equity securities are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 inputs. These securities are mutual funds held within a rabbi trust for the Company’s executive deferred compensation plan. The mutual funds held are open-end funds that are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These funds are required to publish their daily net asset value and to transact at that price.

Securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs. For these securities, the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quoted market spreads, cash flows, the US Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other things.

The fair values of the fair value swaps used for interest rate risk management represents the amount the Company would ~~have expected~~expect to receive or pay to terminate such agreements. These fair values are based on an external derivative valuation model using data inputs as of the valuation date and classified Level 2.

The following table presents the assets and liability measured and ~~recorded~~reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets on a recurring basis at their fair value as of ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, by level within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands).

Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2019
Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Equity securities $ 328 $ 328 $ — $ —
Available for sale securities:
US Agency 7,543 — 7,543 —
US Agency mortgage-backed securities 91,958 — 91,958 —
Municipal 14,471 — 14,471 —
Corporate bonds 37,116 — 37,116 —
Fair value swap asset 930 — 930 —
Fair value swap liability (930) — (930) —
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018
Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Available for sale securities:
US Agency $ 7,529 $ — $ 7,529 $ —
US Agency mortgage-backed securities 89,527 — 89,527 —
Municipal 13,181 — 13,181 —
Corporate bonds 36,494 — 36,494 —
Fair value swap asset 257 — 257 —
Fair value swap liability (257) — (257) —

	Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2020
	Total			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
Equity securities		$	386		$	386		$	—		$	—
Available for sale securities:
US Agency			3,967			—			3,967			—
US Agency mortgage-backed securities			82,084			—			82,084			—
Municipal			15,824			—			15,824			—
Corporate bonds			40,841			—			40,841			—
Fair value swap asset			3,520			—			3,520			—
Fair value swap liability			(3,520)			—			(3,520)			—

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019
	Total			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
Equity securities		$	366		$	366		$	—		$	—
Available for sale securities:
US Agency			5,116			—			5,116			—
US Agency mortgage-backed securities			81,633			—			81,633			—
Municipal			15,170			—			15,170			—
Corporate bonds			39,830			—			39,830			—
Fair value swap asset			959			—			959			—
Fair value swap liability			(959)			—			(959)			—

Assets Measured and Recorded on a Non-Recurring Basis

Loans considered impaired are loans for which, based on current information and events, it is probable that the creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. ~~As detailed in the allowance for loan loss footnote, impaired~~Impaired loans are reported at the fair value of the underlying collateral if the repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Collateral values are estimated using Level 3 inputs based on observable market data which at times are ~~discounted.~~discounted using unobservable inputs. At ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, impaired loans with a carrying value of $760,000 were reduced by a specific valuation allowance totaling $88,000 resulting in a net fair value of $672,000. At December 31, 2018, impaired loans with a carrying value of $11,000 were reduced by a specific valuation allowance totaling $11,000 resulting in a net fair value of zero.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

with a carrying value of $266,000 were reduced by a specific valuation allowance totaling $8,000 resulting in a net fair value of $258,000. At December 31, 2019, impaired loans with a carrying value of $263,000 were reduced by a specific valuation allowance totaling $8,000 resulting in a net fair value of $255,000.

Other real estate owned is measured at fair value based on appraisals, less estimated costs to sell at the date of foreclosure. Valuations are periodically performed by management and the assets are carried at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, less cost to sell. Income and expenses from operations and changes in valuation allowance are included in the net expenses from OREO.

Assets measured and recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands, except range data):

Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2019
Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Impaired loans $ 672 $ — $ — $ 672
Other real estate owned 57 — — 57
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018
Total (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Impaired loans $ — $ — $ — $ —
Other real estate owned 157 — — 157
June 30, 2019 Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value
Estimate Valuation
Techniques Unobservable
Input Range
(Wgtd Avg)
Impaired loans $ 672
Appraisal of collateral(1),(3)

Appraisal adjustments(2)
0% to 100% (12%)
Other real estate owned 57
Appraisal of collateral(1),(3)

Appraisal
adjustments(2)
Liquidation expenses
0% to 44% (35%)
12% to 114% (28%)

~~December 31, 2018~~

~~Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements~~

~~Fair Value~~
~~Estimate~~

~~Valuation~~
~~Techniques~~

~~Unobservable~~
~~Input~~

~~Range~~
~~(Wgtd Avg)~~

~~Impaired loans~~

—

~~Appraisal of collateral(1),(3)~~

~~Appraisal adjustments(2)~~

~~100% (100%)~~

~~Other real estate owned~~

~~157~~

~~Appraisal of collateral(1),(3)~~

~~Appraisal~~
~~adjustments(2)~~
~~Liquidation expenses~~

~~0% to 39% (8%)~~
~~21% to 195% (40%)~~

	Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2020
	Total			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
Impaired loans		$	258		$	—		$	—		$	258

	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2019
	Total			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
Impaired loans		$	255		$	—		$	—		$	255
Other real estate owned			37			—			—			37

Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

March 31, 2020

Fair Value
Estimate

Valuation
Techniques

Unobservable
Input

Range(Wgtd Avg)

Impaired loans

258

Appraisal of collateral(1)

Appraisal adjustments(2)

0% to 100% (3)%

Quantitative Information About Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

December 31, 2019

Fair Value
Estimate

Valuation
Techniques

Unobservable
Input

Range(Wgtd Avg)

Impaired loans

255

Appraisal of collateral(1)

Appraisal adjustments(2)

0% to 100% (3%)

Other real estate owned

Appraisal of collateral(1)

Appraisal
adjustments(2)
Liquidation expenses

0% to 57% (38%)
21% to 134% (30%)

(1)

Fair Value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include various level 3 inputs which are not identifiable. Also includes qualitative adjustments by management and estimated liquidation expenses.

(2)

Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions.

~~(3)~~

~~Includes qualitative adjustments by management and estimated liquidation expenses.~~

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

For the Company, as for most financial institutions, approximately 90% of its assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments. Many of the Company’s financial instruments, however, lack an available trading market characterized by a willing buyer and willing seller engaging in an exchange transaction. Therefore, significant estimates and present value calculations were used by the Company for the purpose of this disclosure.

Fair values have been determined by the Company using independent third party valuations that use the best available data (Level 2) and an estimation methodology (Level 3) the Company believes is suitable for each category of financial instruments. Management believes that cash and cash equivalents, bank

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~AmeriServ Financial, Inc.~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

owned life insurance, regulatory stock, accrued interest receivable and payable, and ~~short term~~short-term borrowings have fair values which approximate the recorded carrying values. The fair value measurements for all of these financial instruments are Level 1 measurements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The estimated fair values based on US GAAP measurements and recorded carrying values at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, for the remaining financial instruments not required to be measured or reported at fair value were as follows (in thousands):

June 30, 2019
Carrying
Value Fair
Value (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Investment securities – HTM $ 39,752 $ 40,775 $ — $ 37,817 $ 2,958
Loans held for sale 1,324 1,362 1,362 — —
Loans, net of allowance for loan loss and unearned
income 880,655 879,993 — — 879,993
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Deposits with no stated maturities $ 674,243 $ 651,367 $ — $ — $ 651,367
Deposits with stated maturities 294,237 294,452 — — 294,452
All other borrowings(1)
73,570 77,545 — 77,545
December 31, 2018
Carrying
Value Fair
Value (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Investment securities – HTM $ 40,760 $ 40,324 $ — $ 37,398 $ 2,926
Loans held for sale 847 871 871 — —
Loans, net of allowance for loan loss and unearned
income 853,611 836,122 — — 836,122
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Deposits with no stated maturities $ 671,666 $ 627,323 $ — $ — $ 627,323
Deposits with stated maturities 277,505 277,010 — — 277,010
All other borrowings(1)
67,148 69,692 — — 69,692

	March 31, 2020
	Carrying Value			Fair Value			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Investment securities – HTM		$	42,068		$	44,236		$	—		$	41,242		$	2,994
Loans held for sale			4,750			4,889			4,889			—			—
Loans, net of allowance for loan loss and unearned income			863,315			867,308			—			—			867,308
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Deposits with no stated maturities		$	646,074		$	642,965		$	—		$	—		$	642,965
Deposits with stated maturities			311,519			315,616			—			—			315,616
All other borrowings(1)			78,694			85,321			—			—			85,321

	December 31, 2019
	Carrying Value			Fair Value			(Level 1)			(Level 2)			(Level 3)
FINANCIAL ASSETS:
Investment securities – HTM		$	39,936		$	41,082		$	—		$	38,129		$	2,953
Loans held for sale			4,868			4,970			4,970			—			—
Loans, net of allowance for loan loss and unearned income			873,427			873,908			—			—			873,908
FINANCIAL LIABILITIES:
Deposits with no stated maturities		$	651,469		$	631,023		$	—		$	—		$	631,023
Deposits with stated maturities			309,044			310,734			—			—			310,734
All other borrowings(1)			74,134			76,323			—			—			76,323

(1)

All other borrowings include advances from Federal Home Loan Bank, guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures, and subordinated debt.

Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies may have a material effect on these estimated fair values. The Company’s remaining assets and liabilities which are not considered financial instruments have not been valued differently than has been customary under historical cost accounting.

20.

Subsequent Events Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Paycheck Protection Program

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, was signed into law on March 27, 2020, and provides over $2.0 trillion in emergency economic relief to individuals and businesses impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act authorized the Small Business Administration (SBA) to temporarily guarantee loans under a new 7(a) program called the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). As a qualified SBA lender, the Company was automatically authorized to originate PPP loans.

An eligible business can apply for a PPP loan up to the greater of: (1) 2.5 times its average monthly “payroll costs;” or (2) $10.0 million. PPP loans will have: (a) an interest rate of 1.0%, (b) a two-year loan term to maturity; and (c) principal and interest payments deferred for six months from the date of

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AmeriServ Financial, Inc.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

disbursement. The SBA will guarantee 100% of the PPP loans made to eligible borrowers. The entire principal amount of the borrower’s PPP loan, including any accrued interest, is eligible to be reduced by the loan forgiveness amount under the PPP so long as employee and compensation levels of the business are maintained and 75% of the loan proceeds are used for payroll expenses, with the remaining 25% of the loan proceeds used for other qualifying expenses.

As of May 4, 2020, the Company has obtained SBA approval for approximately 400 PPP loans totaling in excess of $61 million. These loans will generate approximately $1.9 million in fee income for the Company.

Loan Modifications Related to COVID-19

Under section 4013 of the CARES Act, loans less than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019 will be considered current for COVID-19 modifications. A financial institution can then suspend the requirements under GAAP for loan modifications related to COVID-19 that would otherwise be categorized as a troubled debt restructuring (TDR), and suspend any determination of a loan modified as a result of COVID-19 as being a TDR, including the requirement to determine impairment for accounting purposes. Financial institutions wishing to utilize this authority must make a policy election, which applies to any COVID-19 modification made between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of either December 31, 2020 or the 60th day after the end of the COVID-19 national emergency. Similarly, the Financial Accounting Standards Board has confirmed that short-term modifications made on a good-faith basis in response to COVID-19 to loan customers who were current prior to any relief are not TDRs.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company has begun to prudently execute loan modifications for existing loan customers. The following table presents information regarding loans for which payment relief has been requested, as of May 4, 2020, related to COVID-19.

	Balance			% of Outstanding Loans
	(in thousands)
CRE/Commercial		$	201,658		31.2%
Home Equity/Consumer			5,551		5.5
Residential Mortgage			4,033		3.1
Total		$	211,242		24.1

Requested modifications primarily consist of the deferral of principal and/or interest payments for a period of three to six months. The following table presents the composition of the types of payment relief that have been granted.

Type of Payment Relief	Number of Loans		Balance
			(in thousands)
Interest only payments		84		$	96,163
Complete payment deferrals		304			115,079
Total		388		$	211,242

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (“~~M.D. & A.”~~MD&A”)

…~~..2019 SECOND~~..2020 FIRST QUARTER SUMMARY OVERVIEW…..AmeriServ reported ~~second~~first quarter ~~2019~~2020 net income of ~~$1,792,000,~~$1,409,000, or ~~$0.10~~$0.08 per share. This ~~respresents~~represents a ~~2.8%~~25.0%, or ~~$48,000, improvement over~~$469,000, decrease from the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018 where~~2019 when net income totaled ~~$1,744,000,~~$1,878,000, or ~~$0.10~~$0.11 per share.

~~The return~~These 2020 results represent a strong recovery from the fourth quarter of ~~solid loan growth~~2019. In the fourth quarter, the Company experienced two negative events which reduced net income to $669,000 or $0.04 per diluted share. Therefore, the 2020 net income of $1,409,000 and $0.08 per diluted common share represented double the result of the fourth quarter of 2019. This supports the Company’s position that the loss on the CRA investment, and the ~~continuation~~events surrounding the unexpected death of ~~deposit growth contributed~~a large borrower, did not weaken asset quality.

Any review of the first quarter of 2020 would not be complete without reference to ~~an improved net interest margin which was~~the international pandemic. For the most part, January and February were normal. In the northern part of the U.S., the winter season always experiences a reduction in economic activity. However, in 2020, the events of COVID-19 began to appear in late January and intensify in February, to the degree that, in mid-March, the Federal and state governments declared a virtual shut down of normal activities everywhere. While some business enterprises such as banks were deemed to be essential, their normal activities were subject to substantial change due to governmental restrictions. All AmeriServ banking office lobbies have been closed since March 23, 2020 to walk-in traffic except by appointment. On any given day, one third or more of the AmeriServ employee work force have been working remotely from home using computers to maintain customer access on a virtual basis. Increasingly, transactions are being routed through electronic means using ATMs, online banking and email communications. Fortunately, AmeriServ has been using these technologies for years with the support of FIS (Fidelity Information Services), the largest provider of technology to the entire banking industry.

This is not nearly the entire story. As encouraged by Federal regulatory authorities, AmeriServ has been actively participating in the numerous programs offered by the Administration, by Congress and by the Federal Reserve System. For example, as of April 24, 2020, AmeriServ has assisted approximately 270 customers to submit and receive funding of over $43 million under the Paycheck Protection Program. Recognizing the economic impact of COVID-19 on the small and medium sized businesses that AmeriServ services, there have been interim modifications made to more than 20% of the outstanding balance of existing business loans so that these businesses can survive and fill their role as one of the ~~highlights~~regional job creators in the local economy. This effort has only been possible because of the ~~quarter. Specifically, net loans~~tremendous dedication of the AmeriServ workforce.

It is also interesting to note that in spite of these events, our first quarter 2020 average loan totals have ~~grown by $27~~remained stable with the fourth quarter of 2019, our deposit totals have remained around $980 million, ~~or 3.1%, while deposits~~on average, exactly where they have increased by $19 million or 2.0%, in the first six months of 2019. Asset quality continued to be excellent as non-performing assets and net loan charge-offs remained at low levels, which allowed us to record a zero provision for loan losses inbeen since the second quarter of 2019. The action of the Federal Reserve System to reduce interest rates has reduced interest revenue but interest expense has also declined and should decline further. There are expenses to be provided for because of COVID-19 but so far non-interest expenses are only 3% above the totals for the same quarter in 2019.

Wealth management revenues were 6.6% above 2019 even with the increased volatility of financial markets. Since full year 2019 represented a record year for wealth management fee income, it will be a challenge for them to maintain that pace especially with the recent decline in equity markets. However, there are nine months remaining in 2020 in which to search for positive investment opportunities for our clients and ourselves.

The major source of concern is the very low interest rates and the impact that these low interest rates will have on our net interest margin. But the AmeriServ balance sheet is conservative and strong. AmeriServ’s liquidity is strong and increasing, and AmeriServ’s asset quality for both loans and securities is above that of our peers in this industry.

Once again, the issue before us remains COVID-19. We ~~continue to believe that it is important~~have supported our customers. We hope to return ~~capital~~ to ~~our shareholders through common stock buybacks~~the agenda that prevailed prior to COVID-19 soon. For now, we will focus on safe and cash dividends in order to increase shareholder value. Total capital returned to our shareholders exceeded 53% of net income for the first six months of 2019. Overall, our Company is well positioned to build on this positive momentumsound banking and intelligent involvement in the ~~second half of 2019 in both~~programs our ~~community banking~~government is promoting and ~~wealth management businesses. We will continue to utilize our Banking for Life message to grow revenue.~~funding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE 30, 2019~~MARCH 31, 2020 VS. THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE 30, 2018~~MARCH 31, 2019

~~.....PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW.....~~…..PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW…..The following table summarizes some of the Company’s key performance indicators (in thousands, except per share and ratios).

	Three months ended June 30, 2019			Three months ended June 30, 2018			Three months ended March 31, 2020			Three months ended March 31, 2019
Net income		$	1,792		$	1,744		$	1,409		$	1,878
Diluted earnings per share			0.10			0.10			0.08			0.11
Return on average assets (annualized)			0.61%			0.60%			0.48%			0.66%
Return on average equity (annualized)			7.24%			7.30%			5.69%			7.84%

The Company reported net income of $1,409,000, or $0.08 per diluted common share. This earnings performance represents a $469,000, or 25.0%, decrease from the first quarter of 2019 when net income totaled $1,878,000, or $0.11 per diluted common share. AmeriServ Financial, Inc. reported sound earnings in the first quarter of 2020 while taking the necessary actions to begin to position our Company for the economic uncertainty created by the coronavirus pandemic. We are entering the second quarter of 2020 with strong liquidity, good capital and an increased allowance for loan losses which is higher by $1.2 million from the March 31, 2019 level.

~~.....NET~~…..NET INTEREST INCOME AND ~~MARGIN.....~~MARGIN…..The Company’s net interest income represents the amount by which interest income on average earning assets exceeds interest paid on average interest bearing liabilities. Net interest income is a primary source of the Company’s earnings, and it is effected by interest rate fluctuations as well as changes in the amount and mix of average earning assets and average interest bearing liabilities. The following table compares the Company’s net interest income performance for the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2019~~2020 to the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 (in thousands, except percentages):

	Three months ended June 30, 2019			Three months ended June 30, 2018			$ Change			% Change		Three months ended March 31, 2020			Three months ended March 31, 2019			$ Change			% Change
Interest income		$	12,765		$	11,603		$	1,162		10.0%		$	11,944		$	12,164		$	(220)		(1.8)%
Interest expense			3,704			2,745			959		34.9			3,193			3,507			(314)		(9.0)
Net interest income		$	9,061		$	8,858		$	203		2.3		$	8,751		$	8,657		$	94		1.1
Net interest margin			3.30%			3.28%			0.02%		N/M			3.21%			3.24%			(0.03)%		N/M

N/M — not meaningful

The Company’s net interest income in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2019~~2020 increased by ~~$203,000,~~$94,000, or ~~2.3%~~1.1%, from the prior year’s ~~second~~first quarter. The Company’s net interest margin of ~~3.30%~~3.21% for the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2019~~2020 was ~~two~~three basis points ~~higher~~lower than the net interest margin of ~~3.28%~~3.24% for the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~2019 increase~~change in the U.S. Treasury yield curve between years impacted the Company’s net interest ~~income~~margin. The overall U.S. Treasury yield curve shifted downward since last year while the shape of the curve remained relatively flat, demonstrating inversion in certain segments at various times during the first quarter of 2020. Late in the quarter, the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic caused the yield curve to move down further. Correspondingly, the Federal Reserve’s actions to lower the fed funds rate by 150 basis points in March, caused the short end of the yield curve to decrease and result in the ~~improved net interest margin performance are the result of an increase in total earning assets. Compared to the same time period of 2018, total average~~curve exhibiting a more normal steeper shape.

Total earning assets increased in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2019 by $16.7 million, or 1.6%.~~2020 and partially offset the unfavorable impact that the lower level of national interest rates had on total interest income. The increase in total average earning assets ~~occurred primarily~~was due to growth in ~~the~~total loans and short-term investments while total investment securities ~~portfolio, while total loans increased modestly. Also contributing to the net interest income increase was a favorable shift in the mix of total average interest bearing liabilities as total interest~~decreased. Interest bearing deposits increased and resulted in less reliance on higher cost ~~borrowings~~borrowed funds. Effective management of our funding costs along with the downward repricing of certain interest bearing liabilities tied to ~~fund earning asset growth.~~market indexes resulted in total interest expense decreasing between years. The decrease to total interest expense more than offset the decrease in total interest income resulting in net interest income increasing between years.

Total loans averaged $877 million in the first quarter of 2020 which was $17 million, or 2.0%, higher than the $860 million average for the first quarter of 2019. The impact from the strong level of loan

3234

TABLE OF CONTENTS

production in 2019 was still evident in the increased total loan portfolio average balance during the first quarter of 2020. Also, residential mortgage loan closings in the first quarter of 2020 nearly tripled the level of closings experienced during the first quarter of 2019 due to the significantly lower level of national interest rates. However, loan payoff activity exceeded total new loan originations in the first quarter of 2020 resulting in a $10 million decline in the total loan portfolio balance since December 31, 2019. Even though total average loans increased compared to the same period last year, loan interest and fee income decreased by $86,000, or 0.8%, between the first quarter of 2020 and last year’s first quarter. The lower loan interest income reflects the impact of the lower interest rate environment as new loans originated at lower yields and certain loans tied to LIBOR or the prime rate repriced downward as both of these indices have moved down with the Federal Reserve’s decision to decrease the target federal funds interest rate three times in the second half of 2019, and more significantly, twice in March of this year.

Total investment securities averaged ~~$200~~$189 million in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2019~~2020 which is ~~$16.9~~$9.5 million, or ~~9.3%~~4.8%, ~~higher~~lower than the ~~$183~~$198 million average for the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018. The growth~~2019. Investment security purchases in 2020 have been more selective as the market is less favorable for purchasing activity given the difference in the ~~investment securities portfolio is the result~~position and shape of the ~~rising interest rate environment experienced~~U.S. Treasury yield curve from the prior year. The limited level of purchases that did occur during ~~2018 which provided an attractive market for additional security purchases. Purchases~~the first quarter of 2020 primarily focused on federal agency mortgage backed securities due to the ongoing cash flow that these securities provide. ~~Also, management continued its portfolio diversification strategy through purchases of~~Purchases also included high quality corporate and taxable municipal securities. ~~Investment security purchase activity slowed significantly~~The Company also responded to the uncertain economic environment by maintaining a strong liquidity position as average short-term investments in money market funds increased by $9.7 million in the first quarter of 2020. Interest income on investment securities decreased between the first quarter of 2020 and the first quarter of 2019 by $135,000, or 8.1%. Overall, total interest income decreased by $220,000, or 1.8%, between years.

Total interest expense for the first quarter of 2020 decreased by $314,000, or 9.0%, when compared to 2019, due to lower levels of both deposit and borrowing interest expense. Deposit interest expense in 2020 was lower by $272,000, or 10.0%. Overall, the Company’s loyal core deposit base continues to be a source of strength for the Company during periods of market volatility. Total average deposits grew since the ~~second~~first quarter of 2019 and was more selective as the market was less favorable with the U.S. Treasury yield curve flattening and becoming inverted at times in the short to mid-term portion of the curve. Overall, interest income on investment securities increased between the second quarter of 2019 and the second quarter of 2018 by $279,000, or 19.6%.

~~Total loans averaged $883~~totaled $983 million in the ~~second~~first quarter of 2019 as loan growth returned and loan originations exceeded loan payoffs by $27 million, resulting in the 2019 second quarter average total loan portfolio balance exceeding the 2018 second quarter average balance by $640,000, or 0.1%. The increase between years occurred primarily in the commercial real estate and commercial & industrial loan portfolios. Loan interest and fee income increased by $869,000, or 8.6%, between the second quarter of 2019 and last year’s second quarter. Included in this increase2020 which was a higher level of loan fee income by $141,000, due primarily to the prepayment fee collected on the early payoff of one large commercial loan as well as the increased fees from the greater new loan origination activity. The higher loan interest income also reflects new loans originating at higher yields as well as the upward repricing of certain loans tied to LIBOR or the prime rate as both of these indices have moved up with the Federal Reserve’s decision to increase the target federal funds interest rate in 2018. Overall, total interest income increased by $1.2$13.8 million, or ~~10.0%, between years.~~

Total deposit interest expense in 2019 was higher by $894,000, or 45.3%, for the second quarter, which reflects certain indexed money market accounts repricing upward due to the impact of the Federal Reserve increasing interest rates during 2018. The Company also has experienced increasing market competitive pressure to retain existing deposit customers and attract new customer deposits. Customer product preference changed as well since last year as movement of funds occurred from lower yielding money market accounts into higher yielding certificates of deposit. Overall, total deposits continued to grow for a fourth consecutive quarter and averaged $980 million in the second quarter of 2019, which was $24.5 million, or 2.6%1.4%, higher than the ~~2018 second~~2019 first quarter average. This represents the fourth consecutive quarter that total deposits have averaged in a relatively narrow range of $980 to $985 million. Management prudently and effectively executed several deposit product pricing decreases given the declining interest rate environment and the corresponding downward pressure that these falling interest rates have on the net interest margin. As a result, the Company is experiencing deposit cost relief. Specifically, the Company’s average cost of interest bearing deposits declined by 17 basis points between the first quarter of 2020 and the first quarter of 2019. The Company’s loan to deposit ratio averaged ~~90.1%~~89.2% in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2019,~~2020 which we believe indicates that the Company has ample capacity to grow its loan ~~portfolio.~~portfolio and is positioned well to assist our customers and the community given the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic is having on the economy.

The Company experienced a ~~$65,000,~~$42,000, or ~~8.4%~~5.4%, ~~increase~~decrease in the interest cost ~~for~~of borrowings in the ~~second~~first quarter of 2020 when compared to the first quarter of 2019. The decline is a result of lower total average borrowings between years combined with the impact from the Federal Reserve’s actions to decrease interest rates since the middle of 2019 ~~due to~~and the impact that ~~the 2018 increases in the federal funds~~these rate decreases had on the cost of overnight borrowed funds and the replacement of matured FHLB term advances. ~~Also, due~~The total 2020 first quarter average term advance borrowings balance increased by approximately $8.3 million, or 17.7%, when compared to ~~a new accounting pronouncement that became effective January 1,~~the first quarter of 2019 as the Company ~~recognized additional interest expense~~took advantage of ~~$29,000 on its financing property leases. The 2019 second~~yield curve inversions to prudently extend borrowings. As a result, the combined growth of average FHLB term advances and total average deposits resulted in total average overnight borrowed funds decreasing between years by $12.5 million, or 81.1%. Overall, the 2020 first quarter average of FHLB borrowed funds was ~~$70.9~~$58.2 million, which ~~represented~~represents a decrease of ~~$7.8~~$4.2 million, or ~~9.9%, due to the increase in total average deposits. Overall, total interest expense for the second quarter of 2019 increased by $959,000, or 34.9%, when compared to 2018.~~6.7%.

The table that follows provides an analysis of net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis for the three month periods ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ setting forth (i) average assets, liabilities, and stockholders’ equity, (ii) interest income earned on interest earning assets and interest expense paid on interest bearing liabilities, (iii) average yields earned on interest earning assets and average rates paid on interest bearing liabilities, (iv) the Company’s interest rate spread (the difference between the average yield earned on interest earning assets and the average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities), and (v) the Company’s net interest

TABLE OF CONTENTS

margin (net interest income as a percentage of average total interest earning assets). For purposes of these tables, loan balances include non-accrual loans, and interest income on loans includes loan fees or amortization of such fees which have been deferred, as well as interest recorded on certain non-accrual loans as cash is received. Regulatory stock is included within available for sale investment securities for this analysis. Additionally, a tax rate of 21% iswas used to compute tax-equivalent interest income and ~~yields (non-gaap)~~yields(non-GAAP). The tax equivalent adjustments to interest income on loans and municipal securities for the

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 was $7,000 and ~~2018 was~~ $6,000, ~~and $5,000,~~ respectively, which is reconciled to the corresponding GAAP measure at the bottom of the table. Differences between the net interest spread and margin from a GAAP basis to a tax-equivalent basis were not material.

Three months ended ~~June 30~~ March 31~~(In~~ (In thousands, except percentages)

	2019								2018								2020								2019
	Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Yield/ Rate		Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Yield/ Rate		Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Yield/ Rate		Average Balance			Interest Income/ Expense			Yield/ Rate
Interest earning assets:
Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income		$	883,315		$	11,000		4.94%		$	882,675		$	10,130		4.56%		$	877,097		$	10,339		4.68%		$	860,169		$	10,424		4.80%
Short-term investment in money market funds and bank deposits			6,833			66		3.79			7,670			52		2.64			18,527			76		1.63			8,793			75		3.42
Investment securities – AFS			158,579			1,314		3.34			143,357			1,101		3.07			147,656			1,183		3.27			157,112			1,319		3.38
Investment securities – HTM			40,982			391		3.73			39,264			325		3.31			41,224			353		3.43			41,252			352		3.34
Total investment securities			199,561			1,705		3.42			182,621			1,426		3.12			188,880			1,536		3.31			198,364			1,671		3.37
Total interest earning assets/interest income			1,089,709			12,771		4.66			1,072,966			11,608		4.31			1,084,504			11,951		4.40			1,067,326			12,170		4.57
Non-interest earning assets:
Cash and due from banks			19,367								21,857								19,087								21,899
Premises and equipment			18,795								12,345								18,593								18,128
Other assets			63,251								62,406								65,146								62,081
Allowance for loan losses			(8,184)								(10,035)								(9,317)								(8,665)
TOTAL ASSETS		$	1,182,938							$	1,159,539							$	1,178,013							$	1,160,769
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing deposits:
Interest bearing demand		$	169,029		$	424		1.01%		$	129,026		$	261		0.81%		$	167,066		$	242		0.60%		$	163,893		$	409		1.01%
Savings			97,884			41		0.17			99,268			41		0.17			97,166			41		0.17			97,851			40		0.17
Money markets			235,058			662		1.13			248,983			601		0.97			229,838			464		0.81			241,727			674		1.13
Time deposits			323,080			1,740		2.16			295,164			1,070		1.45			341,948			1,711		2.01			315,389			1,607		2.07
Total interest bearing deposits			825,051			2,867		1.39			772,441			1,973		1.02			836,018			2,458		1.18			818,860			2,730		1.35
Short-term borrowings			20,363			136		2.64			33,731			170		1.99			2,908			12		1.67			15,413			102		2.64
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank			50,571			261		2.07			44,998			192		1.71			55,292			284		2.07			46,984			235		2.03
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures			13,085			281		8.60			13,085			280		8.57			13,085			280		8.57			13,085			280		8.57
Subordinated debt			7,650			130		6.80			7,650			130		6.80			7,650			130		6.80			7,650			130		6.80
Lease liabilities			4,188			29		2.81			—			—		—			3,993			29		2.86			4,224			30		2.83
Total interest bearing liabilities/interest expense			920,908			3,704		1.61			871,905			2,745		1.26			918,946			3,193		1.40			906,216			3,507		1.57
Non-interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits			155,250								183,323								146,840								150,246
Other liabilities			7,409								8,471								12,615								7,141
Shareholders’ equity			99,371								95,840								99,612								97,166
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	1,182,938							$	1,159,539							$	1,178,013							$	1,160,769
Interest rate spread								3.05								3.05								3.00								3.00
Net interest income/Net interest margin						9,067		3.30%						8,863		3.28%
Net interest income/ Net interest margin																						8,758		3.21%						8,663		3.24%
Tax-equivalent adjustment						(6)								(5)								(7)								(6)
Net Interest Income					$	9,061							$	8,858							$	8,751							$	8,657

3436

TABLE OF CONTENTS

…..PROVISION FOR LOAN ~~LOSSES.....~~LOSSES…..The Company ~~did not record~~recorded a $175,000 provision expense for loan losses in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2019~~2020 as compared to a ~~$50,000~~$400,000 provision recovery in the first quarter of 2019, which represents a net unfavorable shift of $575,000. The 2020 provision expense ~~recorded in~~reflects the ~~second quarter~~loan growth experienced since last year along with management’s decision to strengthen certain qualitative factors within our allowance of ~~2018. The zero~~loan losses calculation due to the economic uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. While future losses are possible due to the COVID-19 pandemic, losses were not incurred as of March 31, 2020 which is why the provision for the ~~second quarter of 2019 reflects our overall excellent~~period isn’t higher. The Company’s asset quality ~~and reduced~~continues to remain strong as evidenced by low levels of ~~criticized loans~~loan delinquency, net loan charge-offs and ~~net charge-offs.~~non-performing assets. The Company experienced net loan charge-offs of ~~$5,000, which equates to 0.00%~~$120,000, or 0.06% of total loans, in the ~~2019 second~~2020 first quarter compared to net loan charge-offs of ~~$461,000,~~$164,000, or ~~0.21%~~0.08% of total loans, in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018. Overall, the Company continued to maintain outstanding asset quality as its nonperforming~~2019. Non-performing assets totaled ~~$1.7~~$2.2 million, or only ~~0.19%~~0.26% of total loans, at ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. In summary, the allowance for loan losses provided ~~482%~~416% coverage of non-performing assets, and was ~~0.91%~~1.06% of total loans, at ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, compared to ~~629%~~397% coverage of non-performing assets, and ~~1.00%~~1.05% of total loans, at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

~~.....NON-INTEREST INCOME.....~~…..NON-INTEREST INCOME….. Non-interest income for the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2019~~2020 totaled ~~$3.7~~$3.8 million and ~~decreased $24,000,~~increased $227,000, or ~~0.7%~~6.3%, from the ~~second~~first quarter ~~2018~~2019 performance. Factors contributing to this ~~lower~~higher level of non-interest income for the quarter included:

•

a ~~$40,000~~$175,000 increase in income from residential mortgage loan sales into the secondary market due to the strong level of residential mortgage loan production in the first quarter of 2020. Correspondingly there was an $82,000 increase in mortgage related fee income;

•

a $161,000 decrease in ~~revenue from deposit service charges due to a reduced level of overdraft fee~~other income as the ~~bank is no longer charging a fee on overdrafts that result from signature based point of sale debit card transactions;~~

•

~~The~~ Company recognized a ~~$30,000 investment security sale~~ gain in ~~the second quarter of~~ 2019 ~~after no security sale activity occurred in the second quarter of 2018. The 2019 gain resulted from~~on the sale of ~~one corporate security due to its significant price appreciation because of the falling long term national interest rates;~~equity shares from a previous acquisition and no such gain was recognized in 2020;

•

a ~~$28,000 reduction~~$158,000 increase in wealth management fees ~~primarily~~ due to ~~a lower level~~management’s effective execution of ~~revenue from our Financial Services division because of fewer life insurance related sales~~managing client accounts and an improved equity market which positively impacted market values for assets under management in ~~2019, and;~~

•

~~a $25,000 increase in other income due to a higher level of letter of credit fee income because~~the first two months of the ~~increased loan production.~~first quarter of 2020. The late first quarter 2020 negative impact to the equity market from the COVID-19 pandemic and the pandemic’s impact on the Company’s wealth management fees will be more evident in this year’s second quarter financial results.

~~.....NON-INTEREST EXPENSE.....~~…..NON-INTEREST EXPENSE….. Non-interest expense for the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2019~~2020 totaled ~~$10.5~~$10.6 million and increased by ~~$164,000,~~$340,000, or ~~only 1.6%~~3.3%, from the prior year’s ~~second~~first quarter. Factors contributing to the higher level of non-interest expense for the quarter included:

•

a ~~$130,000~~$403,000 increase in salaries & benefits expense due to pension expense increasing by $188,000, or 53.0% between years. This significant increase to pension expense results from the unfavorable impact that the lower interest rate environment has on the discount rates that are used to revalue the defined benefit pension obligation each year. In addition, the higher salaries & benefits expense is also due to increased health care costs, greater incentive compensation as a result of increased residential mortgage loan production, and increased salaries expense. The higher salaries expense reflects annual merit increases ~~four additional~~and the addition of several employees ~~hired at our new financial banking center in Hagerstown, Maryland and higher health care costs. These increased expenses more than offset reduced levels of pension expense and incentive compensation;~~to address management succession planning;

•

a ~~$80,000 increase~~$94,000 decrease in other ~~expenses due to higher website costs and additional telecommunications~~ expense ~~and;~~resulted from the Company recognizing a reduction in the unfunded commitment reserve;

•

a ~~$75,000~~$54,000 decrease in FDIC insurance ~~cost~~expense due to ~~a reduction to our deposit insurance assessment.~~the application of the remaining portion of the credit from the Small Bank Assessment Credit regulation; and

~~.....INCOME~~•

a $47,000 increase in occupancy and equipment expense primarily reflects higher depreciation costs.

…..INCOME TAX ~~EXPENSE.....~~EXPENSE….. The Company recorded an income tax expense of ~~$470,000,~~$366,000, or an effective tax rate of ~~20.8%~~20.6%, in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2019.~~2020. This compares to an income tax expense of ~~$453,000,~~$491,000, or an effective tax rate of ~~20.6%~~20.7%, for the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018.~~

~~SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2019 VS. SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2018~~

~~.....PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW.....The following table summarizes some of the Company’s key performance indicators (in thousands, except per share and ratios).~~

Six months ended
June 30, 2019 Six months ended
June 30, 2018
Net income $ 3,670 $ 3,511
Diluted earnings per share 0.21 0.19
Return on average assets (annualized) 0.63% 0.61%
Return on average equity (annualized) 7.53% 7.42%

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

For the six-month time period ended June 30, 2019, the Company reported net income of $3,670,000, or $0.21 per diluted common share. This earnings performance was a $159,000, or 4.5%, improvement from the six-month period of 2018 where net income totaled $3,511,000, or $0.19 per diluted common share. Earnings per share grew at a faster rate of 10.5% over this six-month period due to a lower share count as a result of the success of the Company’s ongoing common stock buyback program.

~~.....NET INTEREST INCOME AND MARGIN.....The following table compares the Company’s net interest income performance for the first six months of 2019 to the first six months of 2018 (in thousands, except percentages):~~

Six months ended
June 30, 2019 Six months ended
June 30, 2018 $ Change % Change
Interest income $ 24,929 $ 22,820 $ 2,109 9.2%
Interest expense 7,211 5,214 1,997 38.3
Net interest income $ 17,718 $ 17,606 $ 112 0.6
Net interest margin 3.27% 3.28% (0.01) N/M

~~N/M — not meaningful~~

The Company’s net interest income in the first six months of 2019 increased by $112,000, or 0.6%, when compared to the first six months of 2018. The Company’s net interest margin of 3.27% for the first half of 2019 declined by 1 basis point from the prior year’s first six-month time period. The increase in net interest income is the result of an increase in total earning assets. Total average earning assets increased in the first half of 2019 by $8.6 million, or 0.8%. The increase in earning assets occurred in the investment securities portfolio, while total loans demonstrated a decline for the six-month average comparison. Also contributing to the net interest income increase was a favorable shift in the mix of total average interest bearing liabilities as total interest bearing deposits increased and resulted in less reliance on higher cost borrowings to fund earning asset growth.

Total investment securities averaged $199 million in the first six months of 2019 which was $19.1 million, or 10.6%, higher than the $180 million average for the first six months of 2018. The growth in the investment securities portfolio is the result of management taking advantage of the rising interest rate environment experienced during 2018, which provided an attractive market for additional security purchases. Purchases primarily focused on federal agency mortgage backed securities due to the ongoing cash flow that these securities provide. Also, management continued its portfolio diversification strategy through purchases of high quality corporate and taxable municipal securities. As a result, interest income on investments increased between the first six months of 2019 and the first six months of 2018 by $598,000, or 21.5%.

Total loans averaged $872 million in the first half of 2019 which was $10.3 million, or 1.2%, lower than the 2018 first six-month average. The impact from total loan payoffs exceeding loan originations that was experienced during most of 2018 was still evident in the total loan portfolio average balance during the first six months of 2019. However, as noted in the quarter vs. quarter comparison previously in this analysis, loan growth did return during the second quarter of 2019. This second quarter growth occurred primarily in commercial real estate loans and commercial & industrial loans. Even though the six month average of total loans decreased since last year, loan interest income increased by $1.5 million, or 7.4%, between the first half of 2019 and the first half of 2018. Included in this increase was a higher level of loan fee income by $235,000, due primarily to prepayment fees collected on certain early loan pay-offs in addition to the increased fees from greater new loan origination activity. The higher loan interest income also reflects new loans originating at higher yields as well as the upward repricing of certain loans tied to LIBOR or the prime rate as both of these indices have moved up with the Federal Reserve’s decision to increase the target federal funds interest rate in 2018. Overall, total interest income increased by $2.1 million, or 9.2%, in the first half of 2019, as compared to the same period in 2018.

Total deposit interest expense increased by $1.8 million, or 49.1%, between time periods and reflects higher levels of total average interest bearing deposits and the upward repricing of certain indexed money market accounts after the Federal Reserve interest rate increases during 2018. Additionally, and similar to

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

the quarterly comparision, the Company has experienced increasing market competitive pressure to retain existing deposit customers and attract new customer deposits. Customer product preference changed as well resulting in movement of some funds out of lower yielding money market accounts into higher yielding certificates of deposit. Overall, total deposits averaged $975 million in the first six months of 2019 which was $16.6 million, or 1.7%, higher than the $958 million average for 2018.

Even though total average borrowings decreased between years, the Company experienced a $154,000, or 10.5%, increase in the interest cost for borrowings in the first six months of 2019 due to the impact that the 2018 increases in the federal funds rate had on the cost of overnight borrowed funds and the replacement of matured FHLB term advances. Also, due to a new accounting pronouncement that became effective January 1, 2019, the Company recognized additional interest expense on its financing property leases of $59,000. In the first half of 2019, total average FHLB borrowed funds was $66.7 million, a decrease of $6.7 million, or 9.2%, from the same period during 2018, which was due to the increase in total average deposits. Overall, total interest expense for the first six months of 2019 increased by $2.0 million, or 38.3%.

The table that follows provides an analysis of net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis (non-gaap) for the six month periods ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. For a detailed discussion of the components and assumptions included in the table, see the paragraph before the quarterly table on page 34. The tax equivalent adjustments to interest income on loans and municipal securities for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was $12,000 and $11,000, respectively, which is reconciled to the corresponding GAAP measure at the bottom of the table. Differences between the net interest spread and margin from a GAAP basis to a tax-equivalent basis were not material.

~~Six months ended June 30~~ ~~(In thousands, except percentages)~~

2019 2018
Average
Balance Interest
Income/
Expense Yield/
Rate Average
Balance Interest
Income/
Expense Yield/
Rate
Interest earning assets:
Loans and loans held for sale, net of unearned income $ 871,742 $ 21,424 4.90% $ 882,080 $ 19,954 4.51%
Short-term investment in money market funds and bank deposits 7,813 141 3.58 7,914 99 2.48
Investment securities – AFS 157,844 2,633 3.34 140,693 2,130 3.03
Investment securities – HTM 41,118 743 3.61 39,184 648 3.31
Total investment securities 198,962 3,376 3.40 179,877 2,778 3.09
Total interest earning assets/interest
income 1,078,517 24,941 4.62 1,069,871 22,831 4.27
Non-interest earning assets:
Cash and due from banks 20,633 21,858
Premises and equipment 17,053 12,484
Other assets 62,667 62,390
Allowance for loan losses (8,425) (10,143)
TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,170,445 $ 1,156,460

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2019 2018
Average
Balance Interest
Income/
Expense Yield/
Rate Average
Balance Interest
Income/
Expense Yield/
Rate
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing deposits:
Interest bearing demand $ 166,461 $ 833 1.01% $ 131,202 $ 503 0.77%
Savings 97,867 81 0.17 98,286 81 0.17
Money markets 238,393 1,336 1.13 251,325 1,023 0.82
Time deposits 319,235 3,347 2.11 294,510 2,147 1.47
Total interest bearing deposits 821,956 5,597 1.37 775,323 3,754 0.98
Short-term borrowings 17,888 238 2.64 27,996 262 1.86
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank 48,777 496 2.04 45,418 378 1.68
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures 13,085 561 8.57 13,085 560 8.57
Subordinated debt 7,650 260 6.80 7,650 260 6.80
Lease liabilities 2,797 59 4.23 — — —
Total interest bearing liabilities/interest expense 912,153 7,211 1.59 869,472 5,214 1.21
Non-interest bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits 152,748 182,769
Other liabilities 7,276 8,821
Shareholders’ equity 98,268 95,398
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 1,170,445 $ 1,156,460
Interest rate spread 3.03 3.06
Net interest income/Net interest margin 17,730 3.27% 17,617 3.28%
Tax-equivalent adjustment (12) (11)
Net Interest Income $ 17,718 $ 17,606

~~…..PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES.....~~ The Company recorded a $400,000 provision recovery for loan losses in the first six months of 2019 compared to a $100,000 provision expense in the first six months of 2018. The 2019 provision recovery reflects our overall excellent asset quality, reduced levels of criticized loans and net loan charge-offs, and the lower six-month average balance of total loans. For the first six months of 2019, the Company experienced net loan charge-offs of $169,000, or 0.04% of total loans, compared to net loan charge-offs of $793,000, or 0.18%, in 2018. Overall, the Company continued to maintain strong asset quality as its nonperforming assets totaled $1.7 million, or only 0.19% of total loans, at June 30, 2019.

~~.....NON-INTEREST INCOME.....~~ Non-interest income for the first six months of 2019 totaled $7.3 million, decreasing by only $54,000. Factors contributing to this slightly lower level of non-interest income for the first six months included:

•

a $178,000 favorable change in investment security sale gains after the Company sold a portion of low balance, low yielding securities at a loss in 2018 to reposition the investment portfolio for stronger future returns;

•

a $113,000 decrease in revenue from deposit service charges due to a reduced level of overdraft fee income as the bank is no longer charging a fee on overdrafts that result from signature based point of sale debit card transactions;

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

•

…..SEGMENT RESULTS.…. The community banking segment reported a ~~$58,000 decrease in Wealth Management fees after the equity market declined late in 2018 and unfavorably impacted market values for assets under management~~net income contribution of $2,524,000 in the first quarter of ~~2019. Also, there has been a decrease in life insurance sales within our financial services division;~~

•

a $48,000 decrease in net gains on loan sales into the secondary market due to management’s decision to retain more of the residential mortgage loan production in our loan portfolio earlier in the year when market conditions were more favorable to adjust strategy;

~~.....NON-INTEREST EXPENSE.....~~ ~~Non-interest expense for~~2020 which was down by $424,000 from the first ~~half of 2019 totaled $20.7 million and increased by $346,000, or 1.7%, from the prior year. Factors contributing to the higher non-interest expense in the~~ quarter ~~included:~~

•

a $338,000 increase in salaries & benefits expense due to higher salaries which resulted from annual merit increases, four additional employees hired at our new financial banking center in Hagerstown, Maryland and higher health care costs. These increased expenses more than offset reduced levels of pension expense and incentive compensation;

•

a $241,000 increase in other expense due to higher website costs, additional telecommunications expense and a higher level of funding for the unfunded commitment reserve due to increased loan approvals in 2019;

•

~~a $157,000 reduction in FDIC deposit insurance expense due to a reduction to our deposit insurance assessment;~~

•

~~a $67,000 decrease in professional fees due to lower legal fees and costs for other professional services.~~

~~.....INCOME TAX EXPENSE.....The Company recorded an income tax expense of $961,000, or an effective tax rate of 20.8%, in the first six months~~ of 2019. ~~This compares to the income tax expense of $908,000, or an effective tax rate of 20.5%~~The primary driver for ~~the first six months of 2018.~~

~~…..SEGMENT RESULTS.….~~ Retail banking’s net income contribution was $1,176,000 in the second quarter of 2019 and $2,357,000 for the first six months of 2019 which was up by $422,000 from the second quarter of last year and by $897,000 from the net income contribution for the first six months of 2018. The increase reflects a higher level of net interest income as the funding benefit for deposits provided by this segment improved. This funding benefit more than offset the impact of the immediate upward repricing of money market deposit accounts because of the increases to the Federal Funds Rate during 2018. Retail banking was positively impacted by the lower level of FDIC insurance expense and the Company’s ongoing focus to reduce and control costs, which resulted in lower occupancy & equipment expenses. The Retail banking segment also benefitted from the recognition of a zero loan loss provision in the second quarter of 2019 and a loan loss provision recovery for the full six months of 2019. Slightly offsetting these favorable items was non-interest income decreasing due to the lower deposit service charge income and the decrease to net gains on loan sales into the secondary market due to management’s decision to retain more of the residential mortgage loan production in our loan portfolio earlier in the year when market conditions were more favorable to adjust strategy.

The commercial banking segment reported net income of $1,706,000 in the second quarter of 2019 and $3,473,000 for the first six months of 2019 which was up by $66,000 from the second quarter of last year and by $273,000 from the net income contribution for the first six months of 2018. The higher level of net income was due to the zero loan loss provision for the quarter and the loan loss provision recovery for the six-month time period. These favorable comparisons for the loan loss provision resulted from our outstanding asset quality, reduced level of criticized assets and the lower level of net ~~charge-offs during both time periods. Also,~~income in 2020 was the ~~lower level of average total commercial & industrial and commercial real estate loans over the six-month timeframe contributed~~Company recording an $175,000 provision expense for loan losses compared to ~~the~~a $400,000 provision recovery ~~during the first six months~~in 2019 which resulted in a net unfavorable shift of 2019. The commercial banking segment also benefitted from a higher level of loan fee income in both time periods, due primarily to prepayment fees collected on certain early loan pay-offs in addition to the increased fees from greater new loan origination activity. Loan interest income did not increase by as much that it otherwise could have for the first half of 2019 because of the lower volume of total average commercial loans$575,000 between years. ~~However, new loans did originate at higher yields~~This is discussed previously in the Allowance and ~~existing loans tied to~~

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~LIBOR or the prime rate repriced upward as both of these indices moved up with the Federal Reserve’s fed funds interest rate increases during 2018.~~Provision for Loan Losses section within this document. Also, unfavorably impacting net income was total employee costs increasing ~~due~~and slightly higher occupancy & equipment costs. Partially offsetting these higher costs and favorably impacting net income was a decrease to total deposit interest expense which more than offset a decrease in total loan interest income resulting in this segment’s net interest income increasing between years. The downward shift in the U.S. Treasury yield curve between years along with the Federal Reserve’s actions to decrease the fed funds rate by 150 basis points impacted the Company’s net interest margin performance. The lower loan interest income reflects the impact of the lower interest rate environment as new loans originated at lower yields and certain loans tied to LIBOR or the prime rate repriced downward as both of these indices have moved down. On the liability side of the balance sheet, management’s action to decrease pricing of several deposit products, given the declining interest rate environment, resulted in this segment experiencing deposit cost relief. This segment recognized a higher gain on the sale of residential mortgage loans in the secondary market and a corresponding greater level of mortgage related fee income, both of which resulted from the higher level of ~~full time equivalent employees in the commercial banking segment~~residential mortgage loan production. Finally, and ~~a higher~~also favorably impacting this segments level of ~~funding~~net income was a credit recognized for the unfunded commitment reserve ~~due to increased loan approvals~~ in ~~2019.~~the first quarter of 2020 as well as the lower FDIC insurance expense.

The wealth management ~~segment reported~~segment’s net income ~~of $444,000~~contribution was $487,000 in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2019 and $888,000 for~~2020 which was $43,000 higher than the first ~~six months~~quarter of ~~2019 which was $12,000 higher for the second quarter but $52,000 lower for the same time periods of 2018, respectively.~~2019. The ~~year over year decrease~~increase is due to wealth management fees ~~declining during the first quarter of 2019~~increasing as this segment was ~~unfavorably~~positively impacted by ~~decreased~~management’s effective execution of managing client accounts and increased market values for assets under management ~~after~~which improved in the first two months of the first quarter of 2020. As stated previously in this document, the late first quarter 2020 negative impact to the equity ~~markets declined late~~market from the COVID-19 pandemic and the pandemic’s impact on the Company’s wealth management fees will be more evident in this year’s second quarter financial results. Slightly offsetting the ~~fourth quarter~~higher management fee income were higher levels of ~~2018, as well as~~professional fees, incentive compensation and equipment costs. Overall, the fair market value of trust assets under administration totaled $1.984 billion at March 31, 2020, a decrease inof $246 million, or 11.0%, from the ~~volume~~March 31, 2019 total of life insurance sales. Wealth management fees recovered during the second quarter of 2019 due to market values for assets under management improving after the equity markets rebounded and increased resulting in the favorable quarterly comparison. Finally, and also positively impacting the wealth management segment’s net income was lower professional fees due to lower legal fees and costs for other professional services. Wealth management continues to be an important strategic focus of the Company.$2.230 billion.

The investment/parent segment reported a net loss of ~~$1,534,000~~$1,602,000 in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2019 and a net loss of $3,048,000 for the first six months of 2019~~2020 which is a greater loss by ~~$452,000 for the quarter and $959,000 for~~$88,000 since the first ~~six months~~quarter of ~~2018.~~2019. The increased loss was ~~the result of overnight borrowed funds having~~due to total average securities decreasing by a higher ~~cost due~~amount than the decrease to ~~the increase to national interest rates during 2018 and the immediate impact that the rising interest rate environment has on overnight~~total borrowed funds. ~~Additionally, maturing FHLB term advances repriced upward through 2018 and during~~As a result, interest income from the ~~first half of 2019.~~investment securities portfolio decreased by more than the decrease to interest expense on borrowed funds.

~~.....BALANCE SHEET.....~~…..BALANCE SHEET…..The Company’s total consolidated assets were ~~$1.19~~$1.17 billion at ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, which ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$29.9~~$2.8 million, or ~~2.6%~~0.2%, from the December 31, ~~2018~~2019 asset level. This change was ~~driven primarily by an increased~~related to a decreased level of ~~investment securities, loans, and fixed assets.~~loans. Specifically, ~~total investment securities grew by $3.3 million, or 1.8%,~~ loans and loans held for sale ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$27.0~~$10.2 million, or ~~3.1%, and as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-02,~~ ~~Leases (Topic 842), the Company reported $4.1 million of right of use assets within the fixed assets line of the Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2019. These increases were~~1.1%. This decrease was partially offset by ~~a reduction of total~~an increase in cash and cash ~~equilvalents~~equivalents of ~~$6.8~~$1.9 million, or ~~19.4%.~~8.7%, total investment securities of $3.1 million, or 1.7%, and other assets of $2.2 million, or 36.3% driven by an increase in the fair value of the interest rate swap assets.

Total deposits ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$19.3~~$2.9 million, or ~~2.0%~~0.3%, in the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2019.~~2020. As of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the 25 largest depositors represented ~~22.3%~~20.6% of total deposits, which is a slight decrease from December 31, ~~2018~~2019 when it was ~~22.7%~~20.9%. Total borrowings have ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$4.7~~$1.5 million, or ~~4.4%~~1.5%, since year-end ~~2018.~~2019. The decrease was driven, primarily, by the reduction in short term borrowings of $6.1 million, or 27.0%. The decrease in short term borrowings more than offset the increase in FHLB term advances. Specifically, total FHLB term advances increased by ~~$6.4~~$4.6 million, or ~~13.7%~~8.5%, and totaled ~~$53~~$58.2 million. The Company has utilized these term advances to help manage interest rate ~~risk. In addition,~~risk and the inversion demonstrated by the U.S. Treasury yield curve allowed the Company ~~reported $4.2 million of lease liabilities as a result of the adoption of ASU 2016-02,~~ ~~Leases (Topic 842). These increases were partially offset by a decrease in short term borrowings of $5.8 million, or 14.2%. The decrease in short term borrowings is attributable~~ to ~~the increase in total deposits.~~ prudently extend borrowings.

The Company’s total shareholders’ equity increased by ~~$3.5~~$2.2 million over the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2019~~2020 due to the retention of earnings more than offsetting our common stock dividend payment to shareholders

TABLE OF CONTENTS

and the impact of our common stock buyback program. Additionally, the improved value of the investment securities portfolio had a positive impact on accumulated other comprehensive loss.

The Company continues to be considered well capitalized for regulatory purposes with a total capital ratio of ~~13.14%~~13.41%, and a common equity tier 1 capital ratio of ~~10.28%~~10.44% at ~~June 30, 2019. (See~~March 31, 2020. See the discussion of the Basel III capital requirements under the ~~“Capital Resources” section.)~~Capital Resources section below. As of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the Company’s book value per common share was ~~$5.84~~$5.92 and its tangible book value per common share was ~~$5.15 (non-gaap)~~$5.22 (non-GAAP). When compared to December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, book value per common share and tangible book value per common share each improved by ~~$0.28 and $0.27, respectively,~~$0.14 per common share. The tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio was ~~7.60% (non-gaap)~~7.69% (non-GAAP) at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and improved by 1121 basis points when compared to December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per share are considered to be ~~non-gaap~~non-GAAP measures and are calculated by dividing tangible equity by tangible assets or shares outstanding. The following table sets forth the calculation of the Company’s tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per share at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 (in thousands, except share and ratio data):

	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Total shareholders’ equity		$	101,476		$	97,977		$	100,840		$	98,614
Less: Goodwill			11,944			11,944			11,944			11,944
Tangible equity			89,532			86,033			88,896			86,670
Total assets			1,190,583			1,160,680			1,168,355			1,171,184
Less: Goodwill			11,944			11,944			11,944			11,944
Tangible assets			1,178,639			1,148,736			1,156,411			1,159,240
Tangible common equity ratio			7.60%			7.49%
Tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP)									7.69%			7.48%
Total shares outstanding			17,384,355			17,619,303			17,043,644			17,057,871
Tangible book value per share		$	5.15		$	4.88
Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP)								$	5.22		$	5.08

~~.....LOAN QUALITY.....~~…..LOAN QUALITY…..The following table sets forth information concerning the Company’s loan delinquency, non-performing assets, and classified assets (in thousands, except percentages):

	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			June 30, 2018			March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019			March 31, 2019
Total accruing loan delinquency (past due 30 to 89 days)		$	3,253		$	4,752		$	3,137		$	8,525		$	2,956		$	2,568
Total non-accrual loans			874			1,221			1,000			1,437			1,487			1,150
Total non-performing assets including TDR*			1,681			1,378			1,160			2,244			2,339			1,168
Accruing loan delinquency, as a percentage of total loans, net of unearned income			0.37%			0.55%			0.35%			0.97%			0.33%			0.30%
Non-accrual loans, as a percentage of total loans, net of unearned income			0.10			0.14			0.11			0.16			0.17			0.13
Non-performing assets, as a percentage of total loans, net of unearned income, and other real estate owned			0.19			0.16			0.13			0.26			0.26			0.14
Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets			0.14			0.12			0.10			0.19			0.20			0.10
As a percent of average loans, net of unearned income:
Annualized net charge-offs			0.04			0.11			0.18			0.06			0.02			0.08
Annualized provision (credit) for loan losses			(0.09)			(0.07)			0.02			0.08			0.09			(0.19)
Total classified loans (loans rated substandard or doubtful)**		$	3,908		$	4,302		$	4,715		$	15,958		$	16,338		$	4,219

Non-performing assets are comprised of (i) loans that are on a non-accrual basis, (ii) loans that are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest and principal payments, (iii) performing loans classified as a troubled debt restructuring and (iv) other real estate owned.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Total classified loans include non-performing residential mortgage and consumer loans.

Overall, the Company continued to maintain ~~strong~~good asset quality in the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2019~~2020 as evidenced by low levels of non-accrual loans, non-performing assets, ~~classified loans,~~ and loan delinquency levels that continue to be near or below 1% of total loans. The Company did experience an increase in accruing loan delinquency during the first quarter of 2020. The increase was primarily due to the unexpected death of a borrower late in 2019, which was previously reported in our Form 10-K dated December 31, 2020. The estate, which is made up of significant real estate holdings and other unique assets, is currently in the process of liquidation. Therefore, this $6.3 million commercial and industrial loan exhibited delinquency during the quarter. We also continue to closely monitor the loan portfolio given the number of relatively large-sized commercial and commercial real estate loans within the portfolio. As of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the 25 largest credits represented ~~25.6%~~24.2% of total loans outstanding, which represents a ~~slight~~ decrease from the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 when it was ~~26.4%~~26.1%.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~.....ALLOWANCE~~…..ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN ~~LOSSES.....~~LOSSES…..The following table sets forth the allowance for loan losses and certain ratios for the periods ended (in thousands, except percentages):

	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			June 30, 2018			March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019			March 31, 2019
Allowance for loan losses		$	8,102		$	8,671		$	9,521		$	9,334		$	9,279		$	8,107
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of each of the following:
total loans, net of unearned income			0.91%			1.00%			1.07%			1.06%			1.05%			0.94%
total accruing delinquent loans (past due 30 to 89 days)			249.06			182.47			303.51			109.49			313.90			315.69
total non-accrual loans			927.00			710.16			951.15			649.55			624.01			704.96
total non-performing assets			481.98			629.25			820.78			415.94			396.71			694.09

The Company recorded a ~~$400,000 loan loss provision recovery in the first six months of 2019 compared to a $100,000~~$175,000 provision expense for loan losses in the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2018 that resulted~~2020 compared to a $400,000 provision recovery in the first three months of 2019, which represents a ~~positive~~net unfavorable change of ~~$500,000~~$575,000 between periods. The 2020 provision reflects the loan ~~loss provision recovery in 2019 reflects~~growth experienced since last year along with our ~~overall strong~~decision to strengthen certain qualitative factors within our allowance for loan losses calculation due to the economic uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company’s asset quality ~~reduced level~~continues to remain strong as evidenced by low levels of ~~criticized loans and~~loan delinquency, net loan charge-offs and ~~the lower six-month average loan portfolio balances.~~non-performing assets.

~~.....LIQUIDITY.....~~…..LIQUIDITY….. The Company’s liquidity position ~~has been strong during the last several years, primarily due~~continues to ~~our~~be strong. Our core retail deposit base ~~which provides~~has remained relatively stable over the past several years. The Company’s loyal core deposit base continues to be a ~~reliable~~ source of ~~funds~~strength for the Company during periods of market volatility. Total average deposits grew since the first quarter of 2019, representing the fourth consecutive quarter that total deposits have averaged in a relatively narrow range of $980 to $985 million. The core deposit base is adequate to fund the Company’s operations. ~~Payments and prepayments from the loan portfolio, as well as, cash~~Cash flow from maturities, prepayments and amortization of securities ~~were also~~is used to help fund ~~new~~ loan ~~originations.~~growth. The Company also responded to the uncertain economic environment by maintaining a strong liquidity position as average short-term investments in money market funds increased by $9.7 million in the first quarter of 2020. We strive to operate our loan to deposit ratio in a range of ~~80%~~85% to 100%. ~~For the second quarter of 2019,~~At March 31, 2020, the Company’s loan to deposit ratio ~~has averaged 90.10%~~was 91.6%. ~~Given~~We are positioned well to support our local economy and provide the ~~loan growth experienced~~necessary assistance to our community partners during ~~the second quarter~~this period of ~~2019 and the strength of~~pandemic as well as service our ~~current~~existing loan pipeline ~~we expect~~and grow our loan to deposit ratio ~~to grow moderately through the remainder of 2019.~~while remaining within our guideline parameters.

Liquidity can also be analyzed by utilizing the Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Cash Flows. Cash and cash equivalents ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$6.8~~$1.9 million from December 31, ~~2018~~2019, to ~~June 30, 2019,~~$24.1 million at March 31, 2020, due to ~~$28.8~~$7.6 million of ~~net~~ cash ~~used in~~provided by investing activities which more than offset ~~$17.9~~$5.0 million of ~~net~~ cash ~~provided by~~used in financing activities and ~~$4.1 million~~$626,000 of ~~net~~ cash ~~provided by~~used in operating activities. Within investing activities, cash advanced for new loan fundings totaled $42.6 million and ~~loan participation purchases~~ was ~~$126.6~~$10.0 million ~~which was $26.7 million higher~~lower than the ~~$95.4~~$52.6 million of cash received from loan principal payments and $4.6 million from loan participations sold. Cash utilized for new investment security purchases totaled $10.7 million and was slightly less than cash provided from investment security maturities and sales of $10.8 million.payments. Within financing activities, ~~deposit balances~~deposits decreased by $2.9 million while total FHLB borrowings declined as short-term borrowings decreased by $6.1 million and advances increased by ~~$19.3~~$4.6 million. Short term borrowed funds decreased by $5.8 million, but were more than offset by an increase to advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank by $6.4 million. Within operating activities, originations of residential mortgage loans of $11.4 million offset sales of residential mortgage loans of $11.1 million. At June 30, 2019, the Company had immediately available $352 million of overnight borrowing capacity at the FHLB and $35 million of unsecured federal funds lines with correspondent banks.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The holding company had ~~$7.1~~$6.7 million of cash, short-term investments, and investment securities at ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. Additionally, dividend payments from our subsidiaries also provide ongoing cash to the holding company. At ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, our subsidiary Bank had ~~$9.7~~$10.4 million of cash available for immediate dividends to the holding company under applicable regulatory formulas. Management follows a policy that limits dividend payments from the Trust Company to 75% of annual net income. Overall, we believe that the holding company has strong liquidity to meet its trust preferred debt service requirements, its subordinated debt interest payments, and its ~~increased~~ common stock ~~dividend,~~dividend.

Financial institutions must maintain liquidity to meet day-to-day requirements of depositors and ~~support~~borrowers, take advantage of market opportunities, and provide a cushion against unforeseen needs. Liquidity needs can be met by either reducing assets or increasing liabilities. Sources of asset liquidity are provided by short-term investment securities, time deposits with banks, federal funds sold, and short-term investments in money market funds. These assets totaled $24.1 million and $22.2 million at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. Maturing and repaying loans, as well as the ~~common stock~~monthly cash flow associated with mortgage-backed securities and security maturities are other significant sources of asset liquidity for the Company.

Liability liquidity can be met by attracting deposits with competitive rates, using repurchase ~~program.~~agreements, buying federal funds, or utilizing the facilities of the Federal Reserve or the FHLB systems. The Company utilizes a variety of these methods of liability liquidity. Additionally, the Company’s subsidiary bank is a member of the FHLB, which provides the opportunity to obtain short- to longer-term advances based upon the Company’s investment in certain residential mortgage, commercial real estate, and commercial and industrial loans. At March 31, 2020, the Company had $364 million of overnight borrowing availability at the FHLB, $30 million of short-term borrowing availability at the Federal Reserve Bank and $35 million of unsecured federal funds lines with correspondent banks. The Company believes it has ample liquidity available to fund outstanding loan commitments if they were fully drawn upon.

~~.....CAPITAL~~…..CAPITAL RESOURCES…..The Bank meaningfully exceeds all regulatory capital ratios for each of the periods presented and is considered well capitalized. The Company’s common equity tier 1 capital ratio was ~~10.28%~~10.44%, the tier 1 capital ratio was ~~11.47%~~11.64%, and the total capital ratio was ~~13.14%~~13.41% at ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. The Company’s tier 1 leverage ratio was ~~9.73%~~9.94% at ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. We anticipate that we will maintain our strong capital ratios throughout the remainder of ~~2019. Capital generated from earnings will be utilized to pay the~~

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~common stock cash dividend, fund the stock repurchase program, and will also support controlled balance sheet growth.~~2020. There is a particular emphasis on ensuring that the subsidiary bank has appropriate levels of capital to support its non-owner occupied commercial real estate loan concentration, which stood at ~~344%~~331% of regulatory capital at ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. While we work through the COVID-19 pandemic, our focus is on preserving capital to support customer lending and managing heightened credit risk due to the downturn in the economy. Additionally, we currently believe that we have sufficient capital and earnings power to continue to pay our common stock cash dividend at its current rate of $0.025 per quarter.

In the first quarter of 2020, the Company completed the common stock repurchase program, which it had announced on April 16, 2019, where it bought back 526,000 shares, or 3% of its common stock, over a 12-month period at a total cost of $2.23 million. Specifically, during the first three months of 2020, the Company was able to repurchase 35,962 shares of its common stock and return $151,000 of capital to its shareholders through this program. Evaluation of a new common stock buyback program is on hold. At March 31, 2020, the Company had approximately 17.0 million common shares outstanding.

The Basel III capital standards establish the minimum capital levels in addition to the well capitalized requirements under the federal banking regulations prompt corrective action. ~~Under the Basel III capital standards, the minimum capital ratios are:~~

	~~Minimum capital ratio~~
~~Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets~~		~~4.5~~%
~~Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets~~		~~6.0~~
~~Total capital to risk-weighted assets~~		~~8.0~~
~~Tier 1 capital to total average consolidated assets~~		~~4.0~~

The capital rules also impose a 2.5% capital conservation buffer (“CCB”) on top of the three minimum risk-weighted asset ~~ratios listed above. As of January 1, 2019, the CCB has been fully phased-in and is 2.5%.~~ratios. Banking institutions that fail to meet the effective minimum ratios once the CCB is taken into account ~~(that is, 7.0% for common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, 8.5% for tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and 10.5% for total capital to risk-weighted assets)~~ will be subject to constraints on capital distributions, including dividends and share repurchases, and certain discretionary executive compensation. The severity of the constraints depends on the amount of the shortfall and the institution’s “eligible retained income” (four quarter trailing net income, net of distributions and tax effects not reflected in net income). The Company and the Bank meet all capital requirements, including the ~~fully phased-in buffer,~~CCB, and continue to be committed to maintaining strong capital levels that exceed regulatory requirements while also supporting balance sheet growth and providing a return to our shareholders.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Under the ~~first quarter of 2019,~~Basel III capital standards, the Company completed the previous common stock repurchase program where it bought back 540,000 shares, or 3% of its common stock, over a 9-month period at a total cost of $2.38 million. Specifically, during the first three months of 2019, the Company was able to repurchase 112,311 shares of its common stock and return $476,000 ofminimum capital ~~to its shareholders through this program.~~ratios are:

On April 16, 2019, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a new common stock repurchase program which calls for AmeriServ Financial, Inc. to buy back up to 3%, or approximately 526,000 shares, of its outstanding common stock during the next 12 months. The authorized repurchases will be made from time to time in either the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The timing, volume and nature of share repurchases will be at the sole discretion of management, dependent on market conditions, applicable securities laws, and other factors, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. No assurance can be given that any particular amount of common stock will be repurchased. This buyback program may be modified, extended or terminated by the Board of Directors at any time. During the second quarter of 2019, the Company was able to repurchase 161,554 shares of its common stock and return $686,000 of capital to its shareholders through this program. At June 30, 2019, the Company had approximately 17.4 million common shares outstanding.

	MINIMUM CAPITAL RATIO		MINIMUM CAPITAL RATIO PLUS CAPITAL CONSERVATION BUFFER
Common equity tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		4.5%		7.0%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets		6.0		8.5
Total capital to risk-weighted assets		8.0		10.5
Tier 1 capital to total average consolidated assets		4.0

~~.....INTEREST~~…..INTEREST RATE ~~SENSITIVITY.....~~SENSITIVITY…..The following table presents an analysis of the sensitivity inherent in the Company’s net interest income and market value of portfolio equity. The interest rate scenarios in the table compare the Company’s base forecast, which was prepared using a flat interest rate scenario, to scenarios that reflect immediate interest rate changes of 100 and 200 basis points. Note that we suspended the 200 basis point downward rate shock since it has little value due to the absolute low level of interest rates. Each rate scenario contains unique prepayment and repricing assumptions that are applied to the Company’s existing balance sheet that was developed under the flat interest rate scenario.

Interest Rate Scenario Variability of Net
Interest Income Change in Market
Value of Portfolio Equity
200bp increase 4.5% 24.1%
100bp increase 2.8 14.9
100bp decrease (4.2) (23.6)

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

Interest Rate Scenario	Variability of Net Interest Income		Change in Market Value of Portfolio Equity
200bp increase		8.7%		43.9%
100bp increase		4.8		25.0
100bp decrease		(3.0)		(29.8)

The Company believes that its overall interest rate risk position is well controlled. The variability of net interest income is positive in the upward rate shocks due to the Company’s short duration investment securities portfolio, the scheduled repricing of loans tied to ~~Libor~~LIBOR or prime, and the reduction to overnight borrowed funds. Also, the Company will continue its disciplined approach to price its core deposit accounts in a controlled but competitive ~~manner when interest rates rise.~~manner. The variability of net interest income is negative in the 100 basis point downward rate scenario as the Company has more exposure to assets repricing downward to a greater extent than liabilities due to the absolute low level of interest rates with the fed funds rate currently at a targeted range of ~~2.25%~~0% to ~~2.50%~~0.25%. The market value of portfolio equity increases in the upward rate shocks due to the improved value of the Company’s core deposit base. Negative variability of market value of portfolio equity occurs in the downward rate shock due to a reduced value for core deposits.

~~.....OFF~~…..OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS…..The Company incurs off-balance sheet risks in the normal course of business in order to meet the financing needs of its customers. These risks derive from commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Such commitments and standby letters of credit involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements. The Company had various outstanding commitments to extend credit approximating ~~$227.6~~$217.5 million and standby letters of credit of ~~$16.3~~$14.1 million as of ~~June 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to these commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by their contractual amounts. The Company uses the same credit and collateral policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as for all other lending.

…..REGULATORY UPDATE….. A final rule adopted by the federal banking agencies in February 2019 provides banking organizations with the option to phase in, over a three-year period, the adverse day-one regulatory capital effects of the adoption of ASU 2019-10, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates” (the “CECL accounting standard”). On March 27, 2020, the federal banking agencies issued an interim final rule that gives banking organizations that implement CECL before the end of 2020 the option to delay for two years CECL’s adverse effects on regulatory capital (CECL Interim Final Rule). This is in addition to

TABLE OF CONTENTS

the three-year transition period already in place, resulting in an optional five-year transition. The agencies noted this relief is being provided in order to allow banking organizations to better focus on lending to creditworthy households and businesses affected by recent strains on the U.S. economy caused by COVID-19. Comments on the CECL Interim Final Rule are due by May 15, 2020.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), enacted on March 27, 2020, provides banking organizations with the option to not comply with CECL until the earlier of (i) the termination date of the national emergency concerning COVID-19 declared by the President under the National Emergencies Act or (ii) December 31, 2020. The federal banking agencies issued a statement on March 31, 2020, indicating that banking organizations that elect to use the optional, temporary statutory relief will be able to elect the remaining period of regulatory capital relief provided under the CECL Interim Final Rule after the end of the statutory relief period. Alternatively, banking organizations may adopt the CECL accounting standard as planned in 2020 and use the regulatory capital relief provided under the CECL Interim Final Rule starting at the time of their adoption of CECL.

Federal, state, and local governments have adopted various statutes, rules, regulations, orders, and guidelines in order to address the COVID-19 pandemic and the adverse economic effects of this pandemic on individuals, families, businesses, and governments. Financial institutions, including the Company, are affected by many of these measures, including measures that are broadly applicable to businesses operating in the communities where the Company does business. These measures include “stay-at-home orders” that allow only essential businesses to operate. Financial services firms are generally regarded as “essential businesses” under these orders, but financial services firms, like other essential businesses, are required to operate in a manner that seeks to protect the health and safety of their customers and employees.

In addition, the federal banking agencies along with state bank regulators issued an interagency statement on March 22, 2020, addressing loan modifications that are made by financial institutions for borrowers affected by the COVID-19 crisis. The agencies stated that short-term loan modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 for borrowers who were current prior to any relief do not need to be categorized as TDRs and that financial institutions are not expected to designate loans with deferrals granted due to COVID-19 as past due because of the deferral.

The CARES Act contains a number of provisions that affect banking organizations. The CARES Act provides funding for various programs under which the federal government will lend to, guarantee loans to, or make investments in, businesses. Banking organizations are expected to play a role in some of these programs, and when they do so, they will be subject to certain requirements. One of these programs is the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), a program administered by the Small Business Administration (the SBA) to provide loans to small businesses for payroll and other basic expenses during the COVID-19 crisis. The loans can be made by SBA-certified lenders and are 100% guaranteed by the SBA. The loans are eligible to be forgiven if certain conditions are satisfied, in which event the SBA will make payment to the lender for the forgiven amounts. The Bank has participated in the PPP as a lender.

The CARES Act also authorizes temporary changes to certain provisions applicable to banking organizations. Among other changes, the CARES Act gives financial institutions the right to elect to suspend GAAP principles and regulatory determinations for loan modifications relating to COVID-19 that would otherwise be categorized as TDRs from March 1, 2020, through the earlier of December 31, 2020, or 60 days after the COVID-19 national emergency ends. On April 7, 2020, the federal banking agencies, in consultation with state bank regulators, issued an interagency statement clarifying the interaction between (i) their earlier statement discussing whether loan modifications relating to COVID-19 need to be treated as TDRs and (ii) the CARES Act provision on this subject. In this interagency statement, the agencies also said that when exercising supervisory and enforcement responsibility with respect to consumer protection requirements, they will take into account the unique circumstances impacting borrowers and institutions resulting from the COVID-19 emergency and that they do not expect to take a consumer compliance public enforcement action against an institution, provided that the circumstances were related to this emergency and the institution made good faith efforts to support borrowers and comply with the consumer protection requirements and addressed any needed corrective action.

On September 17, 2019, the FDIC finalized a rule that introduces an optional simplified measure of capital adequacy for qualifying community banking organizations (i.e., the community bank leverage ratio (CBLR) framework), as required by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection ~~Act (the “Act”), which was~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Act. The CBLR framework is designed to ~~ease certain restrictions imposed~~reduce burden by removing the ~~Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform~~requirements for calculating and ~~Consumer Protection Act~~reporting risk-based capital ratios for qualifying community banking organizations that opt into the framework. In order to qualify for the CBLR framework, a community banking organization must have a tier 1 leverage ratio of 2010, was enacted into law on May 24, 2018. Most of the changes made by the Act can be grouped into five general areas: mortgage lending; certain regulatory relief for “community” banks; enhanced consumer protections in specific areas, including subjecting credit reporting agencies to additional requirements; certain regulatory relief for large financial institutions, including increasing the threshold at which institutions are classified as systemically important financial institutions (from $50 billion to $250 billion) and therefore subject to stricter oversight, and revising the rules for larger institution stress testing; and certain changes to federal securities regulations designed to promote capital formation. Some of the key provisions of the Act as it relates to community banks and bank holding companies include, but are not limited to: (i) designating mortgages held in portfolio as “qualified mortgages” for banks withgreater than 9.0%, less than $10 billion in assets, subject to certain documentation and product limitations; (ii) exempting banks with less than $10 billion in assets from Volcker Rule requirements relating to proprietary trading; (iii) simplifying capital calculations for banks with less than $10 billion in assets by requiring federal banking agencies to establish a community bank leverage ratio of tangible equity to average consolidated assets not less than 8% or more than 10% and provide that banks that maintain tangible equity in excess of such ratio will be deemed to be in compliance with risk-based capital and leverage requirements; (iv) assisting smaller banks with obtaining stable funding by providing an exception for reciprocal deposits from FDIC restrictions on acceptance of brokered deposits; (v) raising the eligibility for use of short-form Call Reports from $1 billion to $5 billion in assets; and (vi) clarifying definitions pertaining to high volatility commercial real estate loans (HVCRE), which require higher capital allocations, so that only loans with increased risk are subject to higher risk weightings. In November 2018, as directed pursuant to the Act, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued proposed rules for a community bank leverage ratio (“CBLR”) for certain community banking organizations. Under the proposed rules, a bank or holding company would be eligible to elect the CBLR framework if the institution had less than $10.0 billion in total consolidated assets, ~~met certain risk-based qualifying criteria~~ and ~~had a CBLR greater than~~limited amounts of off-balance-sheet exposures and trading assets and liabilities. The CARES Act reduced the minimum ratio to 8% beginning in the 2nd quarter of 2020 through December 31, 2020, increasing to 8.5% for 2021 and returning to 9%. beginning January 1, 2022. A qualifying community banking organization that ~~elected to opt in to~~opts into the CBLR framework ~~would not be subject to risk-based~~ and ~~leverage capital~~meets all requirements under the ~~Basel III rules. Additionally,~~framework will be considered to have met the well-capitalized ratio requirements under the Prompt Corrective Action regulations and will not be required to report or calculate risk-based capital. The CBLR framework will be available for banks to use in their March 31, 2020, Call Report. The CARES Act ~~requires~~provides that if a qualifying community bank falls below the ~~enactment of a number of other implementing regulations, the details of which may~~CBLR, it “shall have a ~~material effect~~reasonable grace period to satisfy” the CBLR. This provision terminates on the ~~ultimate impact~~earlier of December 31, 2020 or the ~~law.~~date the President declares that the coronavirus emergency is terminated. The Company ~~continues~~will not opt into the CBLR framework for the Bank.

The Federal Reserve has established several lending facilities that are intended to ~~analyze~~support the ~~changes implemented by~~flow of credit to households, businesses, and governments. One of these facilities is the ~~Act and further rulemaking from~~Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility (PPPLF) which was set up to allow the Federal Reserve Banks to extend credit to financial institutions that originate PPP loans, taking the loans as collateral at face value. On April 9, 2020, the federal banking ~~regulators, but, at this time, does not believe~~agencies issued an interim final rule to allow banking organizations to neutralize the effect of PPP loans financed under the PPPLF on the leverage capital ratios of these organizations. Also, in accordance with the CARES Act, a PPP loan will be assigned a risk weight of zero percent under the federal banking agencies’ risk-based capital rules. The Federal Reserve has also announced that it will be creating main street lending facilities to purchase loan participations, under specified conditions, from banks lending to small and medium U.S. businesses. The Company may participate in some or all of them.

Additionally, on March 15, 2020, the Federal Reserve reduced the target range for the federal funds rate to 0 to 0.25% and announced that it would increase its holdings of U.S. Treasury securities and agency mortgage-backed securities and begin purchasing agency commercial mortgage-backed securities. The Federal Reserve has also encouraged depository institutions to borrow from the discount window and has lowered the primary credit rate for such ~~changes will materially impact~~borrowing by 150 basis points while extending the ~~Company’s business, operations, or financial results.~~

term of such loans up to 90 days. Reserve requirements have been reduced to zero as of March 26, 2020.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

~~.....CRITICAL~~…..CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ~~ESTIMATES.....~~ESTIMATES…..The accounting and reporting policies of the Company are in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and conform to general practices within the banking industry. Accounting and reporting policies for the pension liability, allowance for loan losses, goodwill, income taxes, and investment securities are deemed critical because they involve the use of estimates and require significant management judgments. Application of assumptions different than those used by the Company could result in material changes in the Company’s financial position or results of operation.

ACCOUNT — Pension liability
BALANCE SHEET REFERENCE — Other liabilities
INCOME STATEMENT REFERENCE — Salaries and employee benefits and Other expense
DESCRIPTION

Pension costs and liabilities are dependent on assumptions used in calculating such amounts. These assumptions include discount rates, benefits earned, interest costs, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates, and other factors. In accordance with GAAP, actual results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated and amortized over future periods and, therefore, generally affect recognized expense and the recorded obligation of future periods. While management believes that the assumptions used are appropriate, differences in actual experience or changes in assumptions may affect the Company’s pension obligations and future expense. Our pension benefits are described further in Note 18 of the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACCOUNT — Allowance for Loan Losses
BALANCE SHEET REFERENCE — Allowance for loan losses
INCOME STATEMENT REFERENCE — Provision (credit) for loan losses
DESCRIPTION

The allowance for loan losses is calculated with the objective of maintaining reserve levels believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable credit losses. Management’s determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based on periodic evaluations of the credit portfolio and other relevant factors. However, this quarterly evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates, including, among others, likelihood of customer default, loss given default, exposure at default, the amounts and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, value of collateral, estimated losses on consumer loans and residential mortgages, and general amounts for historical loss experience. This process also considers economic conditions, uncertainties in estimating losses and inherent risks in the various credit portfolios. All of these factors may be susceptible to significant change. Also, the allocation of the allowance for credit losses to specific loan pools is based on historical loss trends and management’s judgment concerning those trends.

Commercial and commercial real estate loans are the largest category of credits and the most sensitive to changes in assumptions and judgments underlying the determination of the allowance for loan losses. Approximately ~~$6.0~~$7.1 million, or ~~74%~~77%, of the total allowance for loan losses at ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 has been allocated to these two loan categories. This allocation also considers other relevant factors such as actual versus estimated losses, economic trends, delinquencies, levels of non-performing and troubled debt restructured (TDR) loans, concentrations of credit, trends in loan volume, experience and depth of management, examination and audit results, effects of any changes in lending policies and trends in policy, financial information and documentation exceptions. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provision for loan losses may be required that would adversely impact earnings in future periods.

ACCOUNT — Goodwill
BALANCE SHEET REFERENCE — Goodwill
INCOME STATEMENT REFERENCE — Goodwill impairment
DESCRIPTION

The Company considers our accounting policies related to goodwill to be critical because the assumptions or judgment used in determining the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in past acquisitions are subjective and complex. As a result, changes in these assumptions or judgment could have a significant impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

The fair value of acquired assets and liabilities, including the resulting goodwill, was based either on quoted market prices or provided by other third party sources, when available. When third party information was not available, estimates were made in good faith by management primarily through the use of internal cash flow modeling techniques. The assumptions that were used in the cash flow modeling were subjective and are susceptible to significant changes. The Company routinely utilizes the services of an independent third party that is regarded within the banking industry as an expert in valuing core deposits to monitor the ongoing value and changes in the Company’s core deposit base. These core deposit valuation updates are based upon specific data provided from statistical analysis of the Company’s own deposit behavior to estimate the duration of these non-maturity deposits combined with market interest rates and other economic factors.

Goodwill arising from business combinations represents the value attributable to unidentifiable intangible elements in the business acquired. The Company’s goodwill relates to value inherent in the

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

banking and wealth management businesses, and the value is dependent upon the Company’s ability to provide quality, cost-effective services in the face of free competition from other market participants on a regional basis. This ability relies upon continuing investments in processing systems, the development of value-added service features and the ease of use of the Company’s services. As such, goodwill value is supported ultimately by revenue that is driven by the volume of business transacted and the loyalty of the Company’s deposit and customer base over a longer time frame. The quality and value of a Company’s

TABLE OF CONTENTS

assets is also an important factor to consider when performing goodwill impairment testing. A decline in earnings as a result of a lack of growth or the inability to deliver cost-effective value added services over sustained periods can lead to the impairment of goodwill.

Goodwill, which has an indefinite useful life, is tested for impairment at least annually and written down and charged to results of operations only in periods in which the recorded value is more than the estimated fair value.

ACCOUNT — Income Taxes
BALANCE SHEET REFERENCE — Net deferred tax asset
INCOME STATEMENT REFERENCE — Provision for income tax expense
DESCRIPTION

The provision for income taxes is the sum of income taxes both currently payable and deferred. The changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon the changes in differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the basis of assets and liabilities as measured by the enacted tax rates that management estimates will be in effect when the differences reverse. This income tax review is completed on a quarterly basis.

In relation to recording the provision for income taxes, management must estimate the future tax rates applicable to the reversal of tax differences, make certain assumptions regarding whether tax differences are permanent or temporary and the related timing of the expected reversal. Also, estimates are made as to whether taxable operating income in future periods will be sufficient to fully recognize any gross deferred tax assets. If recovery is not likely, we must increase our provision for taxes by recording a valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets that we estimate will not ultimately be recoverable. Alternatively, we may make estimates about the potential usage of deferred tax assets that decrease our valuation allowances. As of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, we believe that all of the deferred tax assets recorded on our balance sheet will ultimately be recovered and that no valuation allowances were needed.

In addition, the calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If we ultimately determine that payment of these amounts is unnecessary, we reverse the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period in which we determine that the liability is no longer necessary. We record an additional charge in our provision for taxes in the period in which we determine that the recorded tax liability is less than we expect the ultimate assessment to be.

ACCOUNT — Investment Securities
BALANCE SHEET REFERENCE — Investment securities
INCOME STATEMENT REFERENCE — Net realized gains (losses) on investment securities
DESCRIPTION

Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are reviewed quarterly for possible other-than-temporary impairment. The review includes an analysis of the facts and circumstances of each individual investment such as the severity of loss, the length of time the fair value has been below cost, the expectation for that security’s performance, the creditworthiness of the issuer and the Company’s intent and ability to hold the security to recovery. A decline in value that is considered to be other-than-temporary is recorded as a loss within non-interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. At ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the unrealized losses in the available-for-sale security portfolio were comprised of securities issued by government agencies or government sponsored agencies and certain high quality corporate and taxable municipal securities. The Company believes the unrealized losses are primarily a result of increases in market yields from the time of purchase. In general, as market yields rise, the value of securities will

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

decrease; as market yields fall, the fair value of securities will increase. Management generally views changes in fair value caused by changes in interest rates as temporary; therefore, these securities have not been classified as other-than-temporarily impaired. Management has also concluded that based on current information we expect to continue to receive scheduled interest payments as well as the entire principal balance. Furthermore, management does not intend to sell these securities and does not believe it will be required to sell these securities before they recover in value.

~~.....FORWARD~~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

…..FORWARD LOOKING ~~STATEMENT.....~~STATEMENT…..

THE STRATEGIC FOCUS:

AmeriServ Financial is committed to increasing shareholder value by striving for consistently improving financial performance; providing our customers with products and exceptional service for every step in their lifetime financial journey; cultivating an employee atmosphere rooted in trust, empowerment and growth; and serving our communities through employee involvement and a philanthropic spirit. We will strive to provide our shareholders with consistently improved financial performance; the products, services and know-how needed to forge lasting banking for life customer relationships; a work environment that challenges and rewards staff; and the manpower and financial resources needed to make a difference in the communities we serve. Our strategic initiatives will focus on these four key constituencies:

•

Shareholders — We strive to increase earnings per share; identifying and managing revenue growth and expense control and reduction; and managing risk. Our goal is to increase value for AmeriServ shareholders by growing earnings per share ~~by 10 percent year-over-year~~ and narrowing the financial performance gap between AmeriServ and its peer banks. We try to return up to 75 percent of earnings to shareholders through a combination of dividends and share repurchases subject to maintaining sufficient capital to support balance sheet growth. We strive to educate our employee base as to the meaning/importance of earnings per share as a performance measure. We will develop a value added combination for increasing revenue and ~~reducing~~controlling expenses that is rooted in developing and offering high-quality financial products and services; an existing branch network; electronic banking capabilities with 24/7 convenience; and providing truly exceptional customer service. We will explore branch consolidation opportunities and further leverage union affiliated revenue streams, prudently manage the Company’s risk profile to improve asset yields and increase profitability and continue to identify and implement technological opportunities and advancements to drive efficiency for the holding company and its affiliates.

•

Customers — The Company expects to provide exceptional customer service, identifying opportunities to enhance the Banking for Life philosophy by providing products and services to meet the financial needs in every step through a customer’s life cycle, and further defining the role technology plays in anticipating and satisfying customer needs. We anticipate providing leading banking systems and solutions to improve and enhance customers’ Banking for Life experience. We will provide customers with a comprehensive offering of financial solutions including retail and business banking, home mortgages and wealth management at one location. We have upgraded and modernized select branches to be more inviting and technologically savvy to meet the needs of the next generation of AmeriServ customers without abandoning the needs of our existing demographic.

•

Staff — We are committed to developing high-performing employees, establishing and maintaining a culture of trust and effectively and efficiently managing staff attrition. We will employ a work force succession plan to manage anticipated staff attrition while identifying and grooming high performing staff members to assume positions with greater responsibility within the organization. We will employ technological systems and solutions to provide staff with the tools they need to perform more efficiently and effectively.

•

Communities — We will continue to promote and encourage employee community involvement and leadership while fostering a positive corporate image. This will be accomplished by demonstrating our commitment to the communities we serve through assistance in providing affordable housing programs for low-to-moderate-income families; donations to qualified charities; and the time and talent contributions of AmeriServ staff to a wide-range of charitable and civic organizations.

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS~~

This Form 10-Q contains various forward-looking statements and includes assumptions concerning the Company’s beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, estimates, intentions, operations, future results, and prospects, including statements that include the words “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “project,” “plan” or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based upon current expectations, are subject to risk and uncertainties and are applicable only as of the dates of such statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

uncertainties and assumptions. Although we do not make forward-looking statements unless we believe we have a reasonable basis for doing so, we cannot guarantee their accuracy. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this Form 10-Q, even if subsequently made available on our website or otherwise, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise these statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Form 10-Q. In connection with the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the Company provides the following cautionary statement identifying important factors (some of which are beyond the Company’s control) which could cause the actual results or events to differ materially from those set forth in or implied by the forward-looking statements and related assumptions.

Such factors include the following: (i) the effect of changing regional and national economic conditions; (ii) the effects of trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve; (iii) significant changes in interest rates and prepayment speeds; (iv) inflation, stock and bond market, and monetary fluctuations; (v) credit risks of commercial, real estate, consumer, and other lending activities; (vi) changes in federal and state banking and financial services laws and regulations; (vii) the presence in the Company’s market area of competitors with greater financial resources than the Company; (viii) the timely development of competitive new products and services by the Company and the acceptance of those products and services by customers and regulators (when required); (ix) the willingness of customers to substitute competitors’ products and services for those of the Company and vice versa; (x) changes in consumer spending and savings habits; (xi) unanticipated regulatory or judicial proceedings; (xii) potential risks and ~~(xii)~~uncertainties also include those relating to the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak, and actions that may be taken by governmental authorities to contain the outbreak or to treat its impact; and (xiii) other external developments which could materially impact the Company’s operational and financial performance.

The foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive, and neither such list nor any forward-looking statement takes into account the impact that any future acquisition may have on the Company and on any such forward-looking statement.

Item ~~3.....QUANTITATIVE~~3…..QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET ~~RISK.....~~RISK…..The Company manages market risk, which for the Company is primarily interest rate risk, through its asset liability management process and committee, see further discussion in Interest Rate Sensitivity section of the ~~M.D. & A.~~MD&A.

Item ~~4.....CONTROLS~~4…..CONTROLS AND ~~PROCEDURES.....~~PROCEDURES…..(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The Company’s management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and the operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer along with the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, are effective.

(b) Changes in Internal Controls. There have been no changes in AmeriServ Financial Inc.’s internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part II Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

There are no material proceedings to which the Company or any of our subsidiaries are a party or by which, to the Company’s knowledge, we, or any of our subsidiaries, are threatened. All legal proceedings presently pending or threatened against the Company or our subsidiaries involve routine litigation incidental to our business or that of the subsidiary involved and are not material in respect to the amount in controversy.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Not Applicable

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Following are the Company’s monthly common stock purchases during the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2019.~~2020. All shares are repurchased under Board of Directors authorization.

Period Total number of
shares purchased Average price
paid per share Total number of
shares purchased
as part of publicly
announced plan Maximum number
of shares that may
yet be purchased
under the plan
April 1 – 30, 2019 6,000 $ 4.18 6,000 520,000
May 1 – 31, 2019 101,008 4.25 101,008 418,992
June 1 – 30, 2019 54,546 4.25 54,546 364,446
Total 161,554 161,554

Period	Total number of shares purchased		Average price paid per share			Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plan		Maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan
January 1 – 31, 2020		14,500		$	4.20		14,500		21,462
February 1 – 29, 2020		21,462			4.20		21,462		—
March 1 – 31, 2020		—			—		—		—
Total		35,962					35,962

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information

None

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 6. Exhibits

	3.1			Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation as amended through August 11, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-176869) filed on September 16, 2011).
	3.2			Bylaws, as amended and restated on April ~~23, 2019~~2, 2020 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit ~~3.2~~3.1 to the Current report on Form 8-K filed on April ~~24, 2019)~~6, 2020).
	15.1			Report of S.R. Snodgrass, P.C. regarding unaudited interim financial statement information.
	15.2			Awareness Letter of S.R. Snodgrass, P.C.
	31.1			Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31.2			Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.1			Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32.2			Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	101			The following information from AMERISERV FINANCIAL, INC.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~June 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited), (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited), (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (unaudited), (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited), (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited), and (vi) Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

				AmeriServ Financial, Inc. Registrant
	Date: ~~August 12, 2019~~May 8, 2020			/s/ Jeffrey A. Stopko Jeffrey A. Stopko President and Chief Executive Officer
	Date: ~~August 12, 2019~~May 8, 2020			/s/ Michael D. Lynch Michael D. Lynch Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

	Pennsylvania			25-1424278
	(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)			(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
	Main & Franklin Streets, P.O. Box 430, Johnstown, PA			15907-0430
	(Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip Code)

Title Of Each Class	Trading Symbol	Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered
Common Stock	ASRV	The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
8.45% Beneficial Unsecured Securities, Series A ~~(AmeriServ~~ (AmeriServ Financial Capital Trust I)	ASRVP	The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

	Large accelerated filer ☐			Accelerated filer ☐			Non-accelerated filer ☒			Smaller reporting company ☒
	Emerging growth company ☐

	Class			Outstanding at ~~August~~May 1, ~~2019~~2020
	Common Stock, par value $0.01			~~17,384,355~~17,043,644

	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
ASSETS
Cash and due from depository institutions		$	21,609		$	27,970		$	17,675		$	15,642
Interest bearing deposits			3,286			2,740			2,890			2,755
Short-term investments in money market funds			3,246			4,184			3,541			3,771
Total cash and cash equivalents			28,141			34,894			24,106			22,168
Investment securities:
Available for sale, at fair value			151,088			146,731			142,716			141,749
Held to maturity (fair value $40,775 on June 30, 2019 and $40,324 on December 31, 2018)			39,752			40,760
Held to maturity (fair value $44,236 on March 31, 2020 and $41,082 on December 31, 2019)									42,068			39,936
Loans held for sale			1,324			847			4,750			4,868
Loans			889,170			862,604			873,055			883,090
Less: Unearned income			413			322			406			384
Allowance for loan losses			8,102			8,671			9,334			9,279
Net loans			880,655			853,611			863,315			873,427
Premises and equipment:
Operating lease right-of-use asset			890			—			825			846
Financing lease right-of-use asset			3,207			—			3,074			3,078
Other premises and equipment, net			14,809			13,348			14,660			14,643
Accrued interest income receivable			3,916			3,489			3,759			3,449
Goodwill			11,944			11,944			11,944			11,944
Bank owned life insurance			38,652			38,395			39,041			38,916
Net deferred tax asset			3,710			3,637			3,705			3,976
Federal Home Loan Bank stock			4,763			4,520			3,988			3,985
Federal Reserve Bank stock			2,125			2,125			2,125			2,125
Other assets			5,607			6,379			8,279			6,074
TOTAL ASSETS		$	1,190,583		$	1,160,680		$	1,168,355		$	1,171,184
LIABILITIES
Non-interest bearing deposits		$	158,293		$	150,627		$	145,630		$	136,462
Interest bearing deposits			810,187			798,544			811,963			824,051
Total deposits			968,480			949,171			957,593			960,513
Short-term borrowings			35,190			41,029			16,354			22,412
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank			53,124			46,721			58,218			53,668
Operating lease liabilities			907			—			842			865
Financing lease liabilities			3,253			—			3,177			3,163
Guaranteed junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures, net			12,947			12,939			12,959			12,955
Subordinated debt, net			7,499			7,488			7,517			7,511
Total borrowed funds			112,920			108,177			99,067			100,574
Other liabilities			7,707			5,355			10,855			11,483
TOTAL LIABILITIES			1,089,107			1,062,703			1,067,515			1,072,570
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 26,648,728 shares issued and 17,384,355 shares outstanding on June 30, 2019; 26,609,811 shares issued and 17,619,303 shares outstanding on December 31, 2018			266			266
Treasury stock at cost, 9,264,373 shares on June 30, 2019 and 8,990,508 shares on December 31, 2018			(81,741)			(80,579)
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 26,672,463 shares issued and 17,043,644 shares outstanding on March 31, 2020; 26,650,728 shares issued and 17,057,871 shares outstanding on December 31, 2019									267			267
Treasury stock at cost, 9,628,819 shares on March 31, 2020 and 9,592,857 shares on December 31, 2019									(83,280)			(83,129)
Capital surplus			145,883			145,782			145,938			145,888
Retained earnings			49,618			46,733			52,745			51,759
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net			(12,550)			(14,225)			(14,830)			(16,171)
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY			101,476			97,977			100,840			98,614
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		$	1,190,583		$	1,160,680		$	1,168,355		$	1,171,184

	Page No.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Item 1. Financial Statements		1
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) – ~~June 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019		1
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) – Three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~		2
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) – Three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~		3
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited) – Three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~		4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) – ~~Six~~Three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~		5
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements		6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		3233
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk		48
Item 4. Controls and Procedures		48
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings		49
Item 1A. Risk Factors		49
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		49
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		49
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures		49
Item 5. Other Information		49
Item 6. Exhibits		50

	Three months ended June 30, 2019
	Balance at March 31, 2019			Charge- Offs			Recoveries			Provision (Credit)			Balance at June 30, 2019
Commercial		$	2,614		$	—		$	—		$	(76)		$	2,538
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			3,373			—			13			39			3,425
Real estate – residential mortgage			1,213			(10)			68			(53)			1,218
Consumer			125			(88)			12			75			124
Allocation for general risk			782			—			—			15			797
Total		$	8,107		$	(98)		$	93		$	—		$	8,102

	Three months ended June 30, 2018
	Balance at March 31, 2018			Charge- Offs			Recoveries			Provision (Credit)			Balance at June 30, 2018
Commercial		$	3,984		$	(412)		$	4		$	(10)		$	3,566
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			3,550			—			13			123			3,686
Real estate – residential mortgage			1,267			(103)			67			22			1,253
Consumer			142			(53)			23			13			125
Allocation for general risk			989			—			—			(98)			891
Total		$	9,932		$	(568)		$	107		$	50		$	9,521

	Six months ended June 30, 2019
	Balance at December 31, 2018			Charge- Offs			Recoveries			Provision (Credit)			Balance at June 30, 2019
Commercial		$	3,057		$	—		$	5		$	(524)		$	2,538
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			3,389			(63)			24			75			3,425
Real estate – residential mortgage			1,235			(71)			76			(22)			1,218
Consumer			127			(170)			30			137			124
Allocation for general risk			863			—			—			(66)			797
Total		$	8,671		$	(304)		$	135		$	(400)		$	8,102

	Six months ended June 30, 2018
	Balance at December 31, 2017			Charge- Offs			Recoveries			Provision (Credit)			Balance at June 30, 2018
Commercial		$	4,298		$	(574)		$	12		$	(170)		$	3,566
Commercial loans secured by non-owner occupied real estate			3,666			—			26			(6)			3,686
Real estate – residential mortgage			1,102			(217)			77			291			1,253
Consumer			128			(152)			35			114			125
Allocation for general risk			1,020			—			—			(129)			891
Total		$	10,214		$	(943)		$	150		$	100		$	9,521

	At June 30, 2019
	Commercial			Commercial Loans Secured by Non-Owner Occupied Real Estate			Real Estate- Residential Mortgage			Consumer			Allocation for General Risk			Total
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment		$	750		$	10		$	—		$	—					$	760
Collectively evaluated for impairment			254,681			375,663			239,916			17,737						887,997
Total loans		$	255,431		$	375,673		$	239,916		$	17,737					$	888,757
Allowance for loan losses:
Specific reserve allocation		$	78		$	10		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	88
General reserve allocation			2,460			3,415			1,218			124			797			8,014
Total allowance for loan losses		$	2,538		$	3,425		$	1,218		$	124		$	797		$	8,102

	At December 31, 2018
	Commercial			Commercial Loans Secured by Non-Owner Occupied Real Estate			Real Estate- Residential Mortgage			Consumer			Allocation for General Risk			Total
Loans:
Individually evaluated for impairment	��	$	—		$	11		$	—		$	—					$	11
Collectively evaluated for impairment			250,184			356,532			237,964			17,591						862,271
Total loans		$	250,184		$	356,543		$	237,964		$	17,591					$	862,282
Allowance for loan losses:
Specific reserve allocation		$	—		$	11		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	11
General reserve allocation			3,057			3,378			1,235			127			863			8,660
Total allowance for loan losses		$	3,057		$	3,389		$	1,235		$	127		$	863		$	8,671

	Six months ended June 30, 2019									Six months ended June 30, 2018
	Net Unrealized Gains and (Losses) on Investment Securities AFS(1)			Defined Benefit Pension Items(1)			Total(1)			Net Unrealized Gains and (Losses) on Investment Securities AFS(1)			Defined Benefit Pension Items(1)			Total(1)
Beginning balance		$	(1,409)		$	(12,816)		$	(14,225)		$	(327)		$	(12,623)		$	(12,950)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications			2,831			(1,710)			1,121			(1,967)			616			(1,351)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss			(24)			578			554			117			517			634
Net current period other comprehensive income (loss)			2,807			(1,132)			1,675			(1,850)			1,133			(717)
Ending balance		$	1,398		$	(13,948)		$	(12,550)		$	(2,177)		$	(11,490)		$	(13,667)

	Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss(1)
Details about accumulated other comprehensive loss components	For the six months ended June 30, 2019			For the six months ended June 30, 2018			Affected line item in the consolidated statement of operations
Realized (gains) losses on sale of securities		$	(30)		$	148	Net realized (gains) losses on investment securities
			6			(31)	Provision for income tax expense
		$	(24)		$	117	Net of tax
Amortization of estimated defined benefit pension plan loss		$	732		$	654	Other expense
			(154)			(137)	Provision for income tax expense
		$	578		$	517	Net of tax
Total reclassifications for the period		$	554		$	634	Net income

	At June 30, 2019
	HEDGE TYPE	AGGREGATE NOTIONAL AMOUNT			WEIGHTED AVERAGE RATE RECEIVED/(PAID)		REPRICING FREQUENCY	INCREASE (DECREASE) IN INTEREST EXPENSE
SWAP ASSETS	FAIR VALUE		$	22,628		4.78%	MONTHLY		$	16
SWAP LIABILITIES	FAIR VALUE			(22,628)		(4.78)	MONTHLY			(16)
NET EXPOSURE				—		—				—

	At June 30, 2018
	HEDGE TYPE	AGGREGATE NOTIONAL AMOUNT			WEIGHTED AVERAGE RATE RECEIVED/(PAID)		REPRICING FREQUENCY	INCREASE (DECREASE) IN INTEREST EXPENSE
SWAP ASSETS	FAIR VALUE		$	16,681		4.04%	MONTHLY		$	(33)
SWAP LIABILITIES	FAIR VALUE			(16,681)		(4.04)	MONTHLY			33
NET EXPOSURE				—		—				—

Interest Rate Scenario	Variability of Net Interest Income		Change in Market Value of Portfolio Equity
200bp increase		4.5%		24.1%
100bp increase		2.8		14.9
100bp decrease		(4.2)		(23.6)