UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

(Mark One)
xQuarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2015
oTransition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
x    Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2015

o    Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File Number: 1-8351

CHEMED CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware31-0791746
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
255 E. Fifth Street, Suite 2600, Cincinnati, Ohio45202
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)
 
(513) 762-6690
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
 
Yes
x
 No
o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
 
Yesx Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
 Large accelerated Accelerated Non-accelerated Smaller reporting 
Large accelerated
filerx
Accelerated
filer
o
Non-accelerated
filer
o
Smaller reporting
company
o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
 
Yeso Nox

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

ClassAmountDate
   
Capital Stock $1 Par Value16,919,48716,879,147 SharesJuneSeptember 30, 2015
 
 
-1-

 


CHEMED CORPORATION AND
SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES



Index

  3432
EX – 31.1 
EX – 31.2 
EX – 31.3 
EX – 32.1 
EX – 32.2 
EX – 32.3 
EX – 101.INS 
EX – 101.SCH 
EX – 101.CAL 
EX – 101.DEF 
EX – 101.LAB 
EX – 101.PRE 


 
-2-

 

 
       
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
Item 1. Financial Statements 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET 
(in thousands, except share and per share data) 
       
       
       
  June 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
ASSETS      
Current assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $32,705  $14,132 
Accounts receivable less allowances of $17,156 (2014 - $14,728)  119,116   124,607 
Inventories  6,250   6,168 
Current deferred income taxes  16,432   15,414 
Prepaid income taxes  3,474   2,787 
Prepaid expenses  12,069   11,456 
Total current assets  190,046   174,564 
Investments of deferred compensation plans  51,940   49,147 
Properties and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $190,227 (2014 - $185,735)  107,556   105,336 
Identifiable intangible assets less accumulated amortization of $33,031 (2014 - $32,772)  55,979   56,027 
Goodwill  472,546   466,722 
Other assets  7,216   8,136 
Total Assets $885,283  $859,932 
         
LIABILITIES        
Current liabilities        
Accounts payable $39,327  $46,849 
Current portion of long-term debt  7,500   6,250 
Income taxes  20   5,818 
Accrued insurance  42,589   40,814 
Accrued compensation  48,909   50,718 
Accrued legal  1,815   753 
Other current liabilities  21,752   24,352 
Total current liabilities  161,912   175,554 
Deferred income taxes  28,280   29,945 
Long-term debt  152,500   141,250 
Deferred compensation liabilities  52,051   48,684 
Other liabilities  12,742   13,143 
Total Liabilities  407,485   408,576 
Commitments and contingencies        
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Capital stock - authorized 80,000,000 shares $1 par; issued 33,619,982 shares (2014 - 33,337,297 shares)  33,620   33,337 
Paid-in capital  562,654   538,845 
Retained earnings  815,229   771,176 
Treasury stock - 16,800,313 shares (2014 - 16,446,572)  (936,056)  (894,285)
Deferred compensation payable in Company stock  2,351   2,283 
Total Stockholders' Equity  477,798   451,356 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $885,283  $859,932 
         
  
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. 
PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.   Financial Statements
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
  September 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
ASSETS      
Current assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $38,450  $14,132 
Accounts receivable less allowances of $16,548 (2014 - $14,728)  123,665   124,607 
Inventories  6,545   6,168 
Current deferred income taxes  17,323   15,414 
Prepaid income taxes  3,299   2,787 
Prepaid expenses  11,493   11,456 
Total current assets  200,775   174,564 
Investments of deferred compensation plans  49,951   49,147 
Properties and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $195,446 (2014 - $185,735)  111,221   105,336 
Identifiable intangible assets less accumulated amortization of $33,174 (2014 - $32,772)  55,834   56,027 
Goodwill  472,407   466,722 
Other assets  7,450   8,136 
Total Assets $897,638  $859,932 
         
LIABILITIES        
Current liabilities        
Accounts payable $52,468  $46,849 
Current portion of long-term debt  7,500   6,250 
Income taxes  736   5,818 
Accrued insurance  42,356   40,814 
Accrued compensation  59,533   50,718 
Accrued legal  1,698   753 
Other current liabilities  22,472   24,352 
Total current liabilities  186,763   175,554 
Deferred income taxes  29,370   29,945 
Long-term debt  130,625   141,250 
Deferred compensation liabilities  49,282   48,684 
Other liabilities  13,022   13,143 
Total Liabilities  409,062   408,576 
Commitments and contingencies        
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Capital stock - authorized 80,000,000 shares $1 par; issued 33,816,088 shares (2014 - 33,337,297 shares)  33,816   33,337 
Paid-in capital  581,342   538,845 
Retained earnings  839,979   771,176 
Treasury stock - 17,037,021 shares (2014 - 16,446,572)  (968,946)  (894,285)
Deferred compensation payable in Company stock  2,385   2,283 
Total Stockholders' Equity  488,576   451,356 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $897,638  $859,932 
         
  
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. 
 
 
-3-

 
 
             
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME 
(in thousands, except per share data) 
             
             
             
  Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2015  2014  2015  2014 
Service revenues and sales $381,921  $360,182  $758,573  $718,482 
Cost of services provided and goods sold (excluding depreciation)  270,663   257,007   539,548   514,826 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  57,994   53,649   116,582   109,320 
Depreciation  8,082   7,272   16,114   14,421 
Amortization  582   735   1,158   1,744 
Total costs and expenses  337,321   318,663   673,402   640,311 
Income from operations  44,600   41,519   85,171   78,171 
Interest expense  (969)  (2,429)  (1,938)  (6,244)
Other income - net  536   756   1,099   1,572 
Income before income taxes  44,167   39,846   84,332   73,499 
Income taxes  (17,192)  (15,483)  (32,820)  (28,562)
Net income $26,975  $24,363  $51,512  $44,937 
                 
Earnings Per Share                
Net income $1.60  $1.41  $3.05  $2.59 
Average number of shares outstanding  16,880   17,236   16,872   17,374 
                 
Diluted Earnings Per Share                
Net income $1.55  $1.36  $2.96  $2.48 
Average number of shares outstanding  17,419   17,880   17,419   18,097 
                 
Cash Dividends Per Share $0.22  $0.20  $0.44  $0.40 
                 
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share data)
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
  Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
  2015  2014  2015  2014 
Service revenues and sales $386,226  $358,389  $1,144,799  $1,076,871 
Cost of services provided and goods sold (excluding depreciation)  272,089   256,445   811,637   771,271 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  55,197   53,566   171,779   162,886 
Depreciation  8,075   7,450   24,189   21,871 
Amortization  737   717   1,895   2,461 
Total costs and expenses  336,098   318,178   1,009,500   958,489 
Income from operations  50,128   40,211   135,299   118,382 
Interest expense  (908)  (980)  (2,846)  (7,224)
Other income/(expense) - net  (2,355)  705   (1,256)  2,277 
Income before income taxes  46,865   39,936   131,197   113,435 
Income taxes  (18,032)  (15,351)  (50,852)  (43,913)
Net income $28,833  $24,585  $80,345  $69,522 
                 
Earnings Per Share                
Net income $1.71  $1.44�� $4.76  $4.03 
Average number of shares outstanding  16,865   17,039   16,887   17,263 
                 
Diluted Earnings Per Share                
Net income $1.65  $1.39  $4.61  $3.87 
Average number of shares outstanding  17,422   17,627   17,430   17,968 
                 
Cash Dividends Per Share $0.24  $0.22  $0.68  $0.62 
                 
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. 
 
 
-4-

 

       
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 
(in thousands) 
    
  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2015  2014 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities      
Net income $51,512  $44,937 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided        
by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  17,272   16,165 
Deferred income taxes  (2,783)  6,180 
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable  7,734   6,449 
Amortization of discount on convertible notes  -   3,392 
Stock option expense  2,787   2,453 
Amortization of debt issuance costs  262   564 
Noncash long-term incentive compensation  2,391   986 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding        
amounts acquired in business combinations:        
Increase in accounts receivable  (2,182)  (6,782)
Increase in inventories  (78)  (153)
Increase in prepaid expenses  (507)  (3,301)
Decrease in accounts payable and other current liabilities  (1,314)  (33,584)
Increase/(decrease) in income taxes  (2,384)  7,224 
Increase in other assets  (2,229)  (2,748)
Increase in other liabilities  2,966   4,644 
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation  (3,998)  (1,866)
Other sources  189   553 
Net cash provided by operating activities  69,638   45,113 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities        
Capital expenditures  (18,846)  (19,454)
Business combinations, net of cash acquired  (6,614)  (250)
Other sources  395   192 
Net cash used by investing activities  (25,065)  (19,512)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities        
Proceeds from revolving line of credit  103,200   245,500 
Payments on revolving line of credit  (88,200)  (185,500)
Payments on other long-term debt  (2,500)  (186,956)
Proceeds from other long-term debt  -   100,000 
Purchases of treasury stock  (29,762)  (58,493)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  8,044   16,092 
Dividends paid  (7,459)  (6,757)
Capital stock surrendered to pay taxes on stock-based compensation  (5,876)  (3,543)
Retirement of warrants  -   (2,645)
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation  3,998   1,866 
Debt issuance costs  -   (939)
Decrease in cash overdrafts payable  (6,791)  (479)
Other uses  (654)  (252)
Net cash used by financing activities  (26,000)  (82,106)
Increase/(Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents  18,573   (56,505)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  14,132   84,418 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $32,705  $27,913 
         
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2015  2014 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities      
Net income $80,345  $69,522 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided        
by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  26,084   24,332 
Deferred income taxes  (2,694)  5,630 
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable  11,100   9,573 
Amortization of discount on convertible notes  -   3,392 
Stock option expense  3,600   3,430 
Amortization of debt issuance costs  392   697 
Noncash long-term incentive compensation  3,755   1,988 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding        
amounts acquired in business combinations:        
Increase in accounts receivable  (10,110)  (50,027)
Decrease/(increase) in inventories  (373)  318 
Decrease in prepaid expenses  68   4,398 
Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable and other current liabilities  5,956   (29,680)
Increase in income taxes  3,049   8,186 
Increase in other assets  (605)  (3,138)
Increase in other liabilities  524   5,370 
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation  (8,474)  (3,737)
Other sources  467   755 
Net cash provided by operating activities  113,084   51,009 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities        
Capital expenditures  (30,194)  (31,745)
Business combinations, net of cash acquired  (6,614)  (250)
Other sources  396   189 
Net cash used by investing activities  (36,412)  (31,806)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities        
Proceeds from revolving line of credit  103,200   308,600 
Payments on revolving line of credit  (108,200)  (233,800)
Payments on other long-term debt  (4,375)  (188,206)
Proceeds from other long-term debt  -   100,000 
Purchases of treasury stock  (36,682)  (99,103)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  11,193   22,123 
Dividends paid  (11,542)  (10,558)
Capital stock surrendered to pay taxes on stock-based compensation  (11,226)  (6,121)
Retirement of warrants  -   (2,645)
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation  8,474   3,737 
Debt issuance costs  -   (939)
Increase/(decrease) in cash overdrafts payable  (1,745)  22,233 
Other uses  (1,451)  (380)
Net cash used by financing activities  (52,354)  (85,059)
Increase/(Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents  24,318   (65,856)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  14,132   84,418 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $38,450  $18,562 
         
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. 
 
 
-5-

 

 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

1.   Basis of Presentation

As used herein, the terms "We," "Company" and "Chemed" refer to Chemed Corporation or Chemed Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.

We have prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Chemed in accordance with Rule 10-01 of SEC Regulation S-X.  Consequently, we have omitted certain disclosures required under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The December 31, 2014 balance sheet data were derived from audited financial statements but do not include all disclosures required by GAAP.  However, in our opinion, the financial statements presented herein contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.  These financial statements are prepared on the same basis as and should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

2.   Revenue Recognition

Both the VITAS segment and the Roto-Rooter segment recognize service revenues and sales when the earnings process has been completed.  Generally, this occurs when services are provided or products are delivered.  VITAS recognizes revenue at the estimated realizable amount due from third-party payers.  Medicare payments are subject to certain limitations, as described below.

We actively monitor each of our hospice programs, by provider number, as to their specific admission, discharge rate and median length of stay data in an attempt to determine whether they are likely to exceed the annual per-beneficiary Medicare cap (“Medicare cap”).  Should we determine that revenues for a program are likely to exceed the Medicare cap based on projected trends, we attempt to institute corrective action to influence the patient mix or to increase patient admissions.  However, should we project our corrective action will not prevent that program from exceeding its Medicare cap, we estimate the amount of revenue recognized during the period that will require repayment to the Federal government under the Medicare cap and record the amount as a reduction to patient revenue.

During the secondthird quarter of 2015, no Medicare cap was recorded.

During the first sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015, we recorded a $165,000 Medicare cap reversal of amounts recorded in the fourth quarter of 2014 for one program’s projected 2015 measurement period liability.  The fourth quarter of 2014 was part of the 2015 Medicare cap year.
 
Shown below is the Medicare cap liability activity for the fiscal periods ended (in thousands):

 June 30,  September 30, 
 2015  2014  2015  2014 
Beginning balance January 1, $6,112  $8,260  $6,112  $8,260 
2015 measurement period  (165)  -   (165)  - 
2014 measurement period  -   (704)  -   1,796 
Payments  (4,782)  (3,439)  (4,782)  (3,439)
Ending balance June 30, $1,165  $4,117 
Ending balance September 30, $1,165  $6,617 

Vitas provides charity care, in certain circumstances, to patients without charge when management of the hospice program determines, at the time services are performed, that the patient does not have the financial wherewithal to make payment.  There is no revenue or associated accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated financial statements related to charity care.  The cost of charity care is calculated by taking the ratio of charity care days to total days of care and multiplying by total cost of care.  The cost of charity care is as follows (in thousands):
 
 
-6-

 

Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
2015 2014 2015 2014
$1,885 $1,931 $3,859 $3,630
 Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
 2015 2014  2015  2014 
1,929 $1,827  $5,788  $5,518 


3.   Segments

Service revenues and sales and after-tax earnings by business segment are as follows (in thousands):

            
      
 Three months ended June 30,  Six months ended June 30,  Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
 2015  2014  2015  2014  2015  2014  2015  2014 
Service Revenues and Sales                        
VITAS $276,460  $264,026  $546,073  $524,438  $285,008  $265,384  $831,081  $789,822 
Roto-Rooter  105,461   96,156   212,500   194,044   101,218   93,005   313,718   287,049 
Total $381,921  $360,182  $758,573  $718,482  $386,226  $358,389  $1,144,799  $1,076,871 
                                
After-tax Earnings                                
VITAS $21,800  $20,892  $41,116  $39,051  $25,723  $21,593  $66,839  $60,645 
Roto-Rooter  12,153   10,719   24,161   20,751   10,961   9,848   35,122   30,599 
Total  33,953   31,611   65,277   59,802   36,684   31,441   101,961   91,244 
Corporate  (6,978)  (7,248)  (13,765)  (14,865)  (7,851)  (6,856)  (21,616)  (21,722)
Net income $26,975  $24,363  $51,512  $44,937  $28,833  $24,585  $80,345  $69,522 

We report corporate administrative expenses and unallocated investing and financing income and expense not directly related to either segment as “Corporate”.

4.  Earnings per Share

Earnings per share (“EPS”) are computed using the weighted average number of shares of capital stock outstanding.  Earnings and diluted earnings per share are computed as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

 Net Income  Net Income 
For the Three Months Ended June 30, Income Shares 
Earnings
per Share
For the Three Months Ended September 30, Income   Shares  Earnings
per Share
 
2015               
Earnings $ 26,975  16,880 $ 1.60
Dilutive stock options  -  390   
Nonvested stock awards   -  149   
Diluted earnings $ 26,975  17,419 $ 1.55
Earnings $ 28,833   16,865 $ 1.71 
Dilutive stock options  -   399   
Nonvested stock awards   -    158     
Diluted earnings $ 28,833    17,422  $ 1.65 
               
2014               
Earnings $ 24,363  17,236 $ 1.41
Dilutive stock options  -  376   
Nonvested stock awards  -  147   
Conversion of notes   -  121   
Diluted earnings $ 24,363  17,880 $ 1.36
Earnings $ 24,585   17,039 $ 1.44 
Dilutive stock options  -   416   
Nonvested stock awards  -   151   
Conversion of notes   -    21     
Diluted earnings $ 24,585    17,627  $ 1.39 

 
 
-7-

 


   Net Income  Net Income 
For the Six Months Ended June 30, Income Shares 
Earnings
per Share
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, Income Shares  Earnings
per Share
 
2015               
Earnings $ 51,512  16,872 $ 3.05
Dilutive stock options  -  395   
Nonvested stock awards   -  152   
Diluted earnings $ 51,512  17,419 $ 2.96
Earnings $ 80,345  16,887 $ 4.76 
Dilutive stock options  -  391   
Nonvested stock awards   -  152    
Diluted earnings $ 80,345  17,430  $ 4.61 
               
2014               
Earnings $ 44,937  17,374 $ 2.59
Dilutive stock options  -  374   
Nonvested stock awards  -  147   
Conversion of Notes   -  202   
Diluted earnings $ 44,937  18,097 $ 2.48
Earnings $ 69,522  17,263  $ 4.03 
Dilutive stock options  -  402   
Nonvested stock awards  -  147   
Conversion of Notes   -  156    
Diluted earnings $ 69,522  17,968  $ 3.87 
 
For the three and six-monthnine-month period ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015 411,000and 2014, no stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because they would have been anti-dilutive.  For the three and six-month period ended June 30, 2014 nostock options were so excluded.

For the three and six-months ofnine-months ended September 30, 2014 diluted earnings per share was impacted by the issuance of 249,000 shares of capital stock under the conversion feature of our 1.875% Senior Convertible Notes (the “Notes”) on the May 15, 2014 maturity date.  Assuming these shares were issued April 1, 2014 increases average diluted shares outstanding for the second quarterfirst nine months of 2014 by 121,000135,000 shares.  Similarly, the dilutive impact of this conversion feature for the first six months of 2014 was 202,000.


5.   Long-Term Debt
 
On June 30, 2014, we replaced our existing credit agreement with the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“2014 Credit Agreement”).  Terms of the 2014 Credit Agreement consist of a five-year, $350 million revolving credit facility and a $100 million term loan.  The 2014 Credit Agreement has a floating interest rate that is currently LIBOR plus 113 basis points.

The debt outstanding as of JuneSeptember 30, 2015 consists of the following:

Revolver$ 65,000
Term loan 95,000
Total 160,000
Current portion of term and revolving loan (7,500)
Long-term debt$ 152,500
Revolver $45,000 
Term loan  93,125 
Total  138,125 
Current portion of term loan  (7,500)
Long-term debt $130,625 

Scheduled principal payments of the term loan are as follows:

2015$ 3,750 $1,875 
2016  7,500  7,500 
2017  8,750  8,750 
2018  10,000  10,000 
2019  65,000  65,000 
$ 95,000 $93,125 
 
 
-8-

 

The 2014 Credit Agreement contains the following quarterly financial covenants:

Description Requirement
   
Leverage Ratio (Consolidated Indebtedness/Consolidated  Adj. EBITDA) < 3.50 to 1.00
   
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (Consolidated Free Cash Flow/Consolidated Fixed Charges) > 1.50 to 1.00
   
Annual Operating Lease Commitment < $50.0 million

We are in compliance with all debt covenants as of JuneSeptember 30, 2015. We have issued $36.6 million in standby letters of credit as of JuneSeptember 30, 2015 for insurance purposes.  Issued letters of credit reduce our available credit under the 2014 Credit Agreement.  As of JuneSeptember 30, 2015, we have approximately $248.4$268.4 million of unused lines of credit available and eligible to be drawn down under our revolving credit facility.


6.   Other IncomeIncome/(Expense) – Net

Other incomeincome/(expense) -- net comprises the following (in thousands):
 Three months ended June 30,  Six months ended June 30, 
 2015  2014  2015  2014 
Market value gains on assets held in deferred            
compensation trust $498  $650  $1,448  $1,812 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment  (63)  (48)  (15)  (326)
Interest income - net  86   58   130   8 
Other - net  15   96   (464)  78 
     Total other income - net  $536  $756  $1,099  $1,572 

 Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
 2015  2014  2015  2014 
Market value gains/(losses) on assets held in            
deferred compensation trust $(2,328) $896  $(880) $2,708 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment  (116)  (167)  (131)  (493)
Interest income - net  77   (13)  207   (5)
Other - net  12   (11)  (452)  67 
Total other income/(expense) - net $(2,355) $705  $(1,256) $2,277 
 7.   Stock-Based Compensation Plans

On May 18, 2015, the Compensation/Incentive Committee of the Board of Directors (“CIC”) approved a grant of 32,550 shares of restricted stock to certain key employees.  The restricted shares vest ratably over three years from the date of issuance.  The cumulative compensation expense related to the restricted stock award is $4.0 million and will be recognized over the three-year vesting period.  We assumed no forfeitures in determining the cumulative compensation expense of the grant.

On February 20, 2015, the (“CIC”) granted 10,761 Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”) contingent upon the achievement of certain total shareholders return (“TSR”) targets as compared to the TSR of a group of peer companies for the three-year period ending December 31, 2017, the date at which such awards vest.  The cumulative compensation cost of the TSR-based PSU award to be recorded over the three year service period is $1.5 million.

On February 20, 2015, the CIC also granted 10,761 PSUs contingent upon the achievement of certain earnings per share (“EPS”) targets for the three-year period ending December 31, 2017.  At the end of each reporting period, the Company estimates the number of shares that it believes will ultimately be earned and records that expense over the service period of the award.  We currently estimate the cumulative compensation cost of the EPS-based PSUs to be recorded over the three year service period is $1.6$1.9 million.
-9-


8.   Independent Contractor Operations

The Roto-Rooter segment sublicenses with 69 independent contractors to operate certain plumbing repair and drain cleaning businesses in lesser-populated areas of the United States and Canada.  We had notes receivable from our independent contractors as of JuneSeptember 30, 2015 totaling $1.6$1.9 million (December 31, 2014 - $1.6 million).  In most cases these loans are fully or partially secured by equipment owned by the contractor.  The interest rates on the loans range from 0% to 7% per annum and the remaining terms of the loans range from 2 months to 5 years at JuneSeptember 30, 2015.  We recorded the following from our independent contractors (in thousands):

 Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, 
 2015 2014 2015 2014 
Revenues $9,527  $9,190  $18,991  $18,213 
Pretax profits  5,661   5,235   11,218   10,395 
-9-

 Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
 2015 2014  2015 2014 
Revenues $9,119  $8,751  $28,110  $26,964 
Pretax profits  5,435   4,946   16,653   15,341 

9.   Retirement Plans

All of the Company’s plans that provide retirement and similar benefits are defined contribution plans.  These expenses include the impact of market gains and losses on assets held in deferred compensation plans.  Expenses for the Company’s pension and profit-sharing plans, excess benefit plans and other similar plans are as follows (in thousands):

Three months ended June 30,  Six months ended June 30, 
2015  2014  2015  2014 
$2,991  $3,324  $7,178  $7,222 
 Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
 2015 2014  2015  2014 
458 $3,635  $7,636  $10,856 


10.  Legal and Regulatory Matters

The VITAS segment of the Company’s business operates in a heavily-regulated industry.  As a result, the Company is subjected to inquiries and investigations by various government agencies, as well as to lawsuits, including qui tam actions.  The following sections describe the various ongoing material lawsuits and investigations of which the Company is currently aware.  It is not possible at this time for us to estimate either the timing or outcome of any of those matters, or whether any potential loss, or range of potential losses, is probable or estimable.

Regulatory Matters and Litigation

In June 2011, the U.S. Attorney provided the Company with a partially unsealed qui tam complaint filed under seal in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas,  United States, et al. ex rel. Urick v. VITAS HME Solutions, Inc. et al., 5:08-cv-0663 (“Urick”).  The U.S. Attorney filed a notice in May 2012 stating that it had decided not to intervene in the case at that time but indicating that it continues to investigate the allegations.  In June 2012, the complaint was unsealed.  The complaint asserts violations of the federal False Claims Act and the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act based on allegations of a conspiracy to submit to Medicare and Medicaid false claims involving hospice services for ineligible patients, unnecessary medical supplies, failing to satisfy certain prerequisites for payment, and altering patient records, including backdating patient revocations.  The suit was brought by Barbara Urick, a then registered nurse in VITAS’s San Antonio program, against VITAS, certain of its affiliates, and several former VITAS employees, including physicians Justo Cisneros and Antonio Cavasos and nurses Sally Schwenk, Diane Anest, and Edith Reed.  In September 2012 and July 2013, the plaintiff dismissed all claims against the individual defendants.  The complaint was served on the VITAS entities on April 12, 2013.

Also in June 2011, the U.S. Attorney provided the Company with a partially unsealed qui tam complaint filed under seal in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, United States, et al. ex rel. Spottiswood v. Chemed Corp., 1:07-cv-4566 (“Spottiswood”).  In April 2012, the complaint was unsealed.  The U.S. Attorney and Attorney General for the State of Illinois filed notices in April and May 2012, respectively, stating that they had decided not to intervene in the case at that time but indicating that they continue to investigate the allegations.  Plaintiff filed an amended complaint in November 2012.  The complaint asserts violations of the federal False Claims Act and the Illinois Whistleblower Reward and Protection Act based on allegations that VITAS fraudulently billed Medicare and Medicaid for providing unwarranted continuous care services.  The suit was brought by Laura Spottiswood, a former part-time pool registered nurse at VITAS, against Chemed, VITAS, and a VITAS affiliate.  The complaint was served on the defendants on April 12, 2013.  On May 29 and June 4, 2013, respectively, the Court granted the government’s motion to partially intervene in Spottiswood and in Urick on the allegations that VITAS submitted or caused to be submitted false or fraudulent claims for continuous care and routine home care on behalf of certain ineligible Medicare beneficiaries.  The Court also transferred them to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri under docket Nos. 4:13-cv-505 and 4:13-cv-563, respectively.
-10-

On May 2, 2013, the government filed a False Claims Act complaint against the Company and certain of its hospice-related subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, United States v. VITAS Hospice Services, LLC, et al., No. 4:13-cv-00449-BCW (the “2013 Action”).  Prior to that date, the Company received various qui tam lawsuits and subpoenas from the U.S. Department of Justice and OIG that have been previously disclosed.  The 2013 Action alleges that, since at least 2002, VITAS, and since 2004, the Company, submitted or caused the submission of false claims to the Medicare program by (a) billing Medicare for continuous home care services when the patients were not eligible, the services were not provided, or the medical care was inappropriate, and (b) billing Medicare for patients who were not eligible for the Medicare hospice benefit because they did not have a life expectancy of six months or less if their illnesses ran their normal course.  This complaint seeks treble damages, statutory penalties, and the costs of the action, plus interest.  The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on September 24, 2013.  On August 1, 2013,September 30, 2014, the Court denied the motion, except to the extent that claims were filed before July 24, 2002. On November 13, 2014, the government filed its Firsta Second Amended Complaint in the 2013 Action.Complaint.  The FirstSecond Amended Complaint changed and supplemented some of the allegations, but did not otherwise expand the causes of action or the nature of the relief sought against VITAS.  The defendantsVITAS filed a motion to dismiss on September 24, 2013.  The Court denied the motion, exceptits Answer to the extent that claims were filed before July 24, 2002,Second Amended Complaint on September 30, 2014. August 11, 2015.  The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the probability of loss or range of loss at this time.

On May 6, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Western DistrictFor additional procedural history of Missouri, at the request of the government, unsealed a qui tam complaint against VITASthis litigation, please refer to our prior quarterly and VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, United States ex rel. Charles Gonzales v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation, et al., CV 12-0761-R (“Gonzales”).  The case was transferred from the Central District of California to the Western District of Missouri under docket No. 4:13-cv-344.  The government partially intervened in Gonzales.  The Gonzales complaint alleges that VITAS’ Los Angeles program falsely certified and recertified patients as eligible for the Medicare Hospice Benefit.  It alleges violations of the False Claims Act and seeks treble damages, civil penalties, recovery of costs, attorneys’ fees and expenses, and pre- and post-judgment interest.  

On September 25, 2013, the Court granted a joint motion by the government, the relators, and VITAS to consolidate the Spottiswood,  Urick, and  Gonzales complaints with the 2013 Action.  As a result, the First Amended Complaint will govern the consolidated federal claims brought by the United States and the relators for all purposes.  The relators and VITAS have stipulated that certain non-intervened claims will not be pursued by the relators.  The Spottiswood relator filed an action under the Illinois False Claims Act, The State of Illinois ex rel. Laura Spottiswood v. Chemed Corporation, et al., No. 14 L 2786 in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois on March 6, 2014.  The Court granted the parties’ joint motion to place this case on its stay calendar, pending resolution of the 2013 Action.

VITAS has also received document subpoenas in related state matters.  In February 2010, VITAS received a civil investigative demand (“CID”) from the Texas Attorney General seeking documents from January 1, 2002 through the date of the CID, and interrogatory responses in connection with an investigation of possible fraudulent submission of Medicaid claims for non-qualifying patients and fraudulent shifting of costs from VITAS to the State of Texas and the United States.  The CID requested similar information sought by prior Department of Justice subpoenas, including policy and procedure manuals and information concerning Medicare and Medicaid billing, patient statistics and sales and marketing practices, together with information concerning record-keeping and retention practices, and medical records concerning 117 patients.  In September 2010, VITAS received a third CID from the Texas Attorney General seeking additional documents concerning business plans and results, revocation forms for certain patients, and electronic documents of 10 current and former employees.  In July 2012, VITAS received an investigative subpoena from the Florida Attorney General seeking documents previously produced in the course of prior government investigations as well as, for the period January 1, 2007 through the date of production, billing records and procedures; information concerning business results, plans, and strategies; documents concerning patient eligibility for hospice care; and certain information concerning employees and their compensation.

annual filings. The costs incurred related to U.S. v. Vitas and related regulatory matters were $1.4$1.2 million and $410,000$450,000 for the quarters ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014, the net costs were $2.7$3.8 million and $1.2$1.6 million respectively.

In November 2013, two shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed against the Company’s current and former directors, as well as certain of its officers, both of which are covered by the Company’s commercial insurance.  On November 6, 2013, KBC Asset Management NV filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, KBC Asset Management NV, derivatively on behalf of Chemed Corp. v. McNamara, et al., No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (D. Del.).  It sued Kevin McNamara, Joel Gemunder, Patrick Grace, Thomas Hutton, Walter Krebs, Andrea Lindell, Thomas Rice, Donald Saunders, Arthur Tucker, Jr., George Walsh III, Frank Wood, Timothy O’Toole, David Williams and Ernest Mrozek, together with the Company as nominal defendant.  Plaintiff alleges that since at least 2004, Chemed, through VITAS, has submitted or caused the submission of false claims to Medicare.  The suit alleges a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the individual defendants, and seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees.
 
 
-11--10-

 


On November 14, 2013, Mildred A. North filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, North, derivatively on behalf of Chemed Corp. v. Kevin McNamara, el al., No. 13 Civ. 833 (MDB) (S.D. Ohio).  She sued Kevin McNamara, David Williams, Timothy O’Toole, Joel Gemunder, Patrick Grace, Walter Krebs, Andrea Lindell, Thomas Rice, Donald Saunders, George Walsh III, Frank Wood and Thomas Hutton, together with the Company as nominal defendant.  Plaintiff alleges that, between February 2010 and the present, the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties as officers and directors of Chemed by, among other things, (a) allegedly causing VITAS
to submit improper and ineligible claims to Medicare and Medicaid; and (b) allegedly misrepresenting the state of Chemed’s internal controls.  The suit alleges claims for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control and gross mismanagement against the individual defendants.  The complaint also alleges unjust enrichment and insider trading against Messrs. McNamara, Williams and O’Toole.  Plaintiff seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees.

On January 29, 2014 defendants in North filed a motion to transfer that case to Delaware under 28 U.S.C § 1404(a). On February 12, 2014, defendants in KBC filed a motion to dismiss that case pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23.1 and 12(b)(6).  On September 19, 2014, the Ohio court granted defendants’ motion to transfer North to Delaware.  Following that decision and in light of that transfer, on September 29, 2014, the Delaware court denied without prejudice defendants’ motion to dismiss KBC, and referred both cases to Magistrate Judge Burke.

On October 15, 2014, Plaintiff KBC filed a motion to consolidate KBC with North.  On February 2, 2015 the court granted the motion for consolidation in full, appointing Plaintiff KBC the sole lead plaintiff and its counsel, the sole lead and liaison counsel.  The court ordered that both cases will proceed under the caption In re Chemed Corp. Shareholder and Derivative Litigation, No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (CJB) (D. Del.).  Plaintiff KBC has designated its pending complaint as the operative complaint in the consolidated proceedings.  Defendants have renewed their motion to dismiss the claims and allegations.

The Company intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in each of the above lawsuits.  Regardless of the outcome of any of the preceding matters, responding to the subpoenas and dealing with the various regulatory agencies and opposing parties can adversely affect us through defense costs, potential payments, diversion of management time, and related publicity.  Although the Company intends to defend them vigorously, there can be no assurance that those suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.

11.   Concentration of Risk

VITAS has pharmacy services agreements ("Agreements") with Omnicare, Inc.Enclara Pharmacia (previously Hospice Pharmacia) and its subsidiaries (“OCR”) whereby OCREnclara provides specified pharmacy services for VITAS and its hospice patients in geographical areas served by both VITAS and OCR.  The Agreements renew automatically for three-year terms.  Either party may cancel the Agreements at the end of any term by giving 30 days prior written notice.Enclara.  VITAS made purchases from OCREnclara of $9.5 million and $8.8 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.  VITAS made purchases from OCREnclara of $18.7$28.3 million and $17.7$26.5 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. For the three and sixnine month periods ending JuneSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, purchases from this vendor exceed 90% of all pharmacy services used by VITAS.

12.   Cash Overdrafts and Cash Equivalents

Included in accounts payable at JuneSeptember 30, 2015 is cash overdrafts payable of $3.7$8.8 million (December 31, 2014 - $10.5 million).

From time to time throughout the year, we invest excess cash in money market funds with major commercial banks. We closely monitor the creditworthiness of the institutions with which we invest our overnight funds.  We had $66,000$52,000 in cash equivalents as of JuneSeptember 30, 2015.  There was $80,000 in cash equivalents as of December 31, 2014.  The weighted average rate of return for our cash equivalents was 0.08%0.10% at JuneSeptember 30, 2015 and 0.06% at December 31, 2014.
 
 
-12--11-

 


13.   Financial Instruments

FASB’s authoritative guidance on fair value measurements defines a hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs in fair value measurements.  Level 1 measurements are measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.  Level 2 measurements use significant other observable inputs.  Level 3 measurements are measurements using significant unobservable inputs which require a company to develop its own assumptions.  In recording the fair value of assets and liabilities, companies must use the most reliable measurement available.  For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the liquidity and short-term nature of these instruments.

The following shows the carrying value, fair value and the hierarchy for our financial instruments as of JuneSeptember 30, 2015 (in thousands):
 
    Fair Value Measure    Fair Value Measure 
           
 Carrying Value  
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)  
Significant Unobservable
 Inputs (Level 3)
 Carrying Value  Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Mutual fund investments of deferred                       
compensation plans held in trust $51,940  $51,940  $-  $- $49,951  $49,951  $-  $- 
Long-term debt  160,000   -   160,000   -  138,125   -   138,125   - 

For the mutual fund investments carrying value is fair value.  All outstanding long-term debt is at a floating interest rate tied to LIBOR. Therefore, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimation of fair value.

The following shows the carrying value, fair value and the hierarchy for our financial instruments as of December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

            
     Fair Value Measure
  Carrying Value  
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)  
Significant Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
Mutual fund investments of deferred           
compensation plans held in trust $49,147  $49,147  $-  $-
Long-term debt  147,500   -   147,500   -

For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the liquidity and short-term nature of these instruments.
     Fair Value Measure 
       
  Carrying Value  Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Mutual fund investments of deferred            
compensation plans held in trust $49,147  $49,147  $-  $- 
Long-term debt  147,500   -   147,500   - 

14.   Capital Stock Repurchase Plan Transactions

We repurchased the following capital stock for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014:
 
Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30, Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
2015 2014 2015 2014 2015  2014  2015  2014 
                       
Total cost of repurchased shares $18,230  $40,610  $47,992  $99,103 
Shares repurchased  250,000   300,000   250,000   682,934  135,765   400,000   385,765   1,082,934 
Weighted average price per share $119.05  $85.04  $119.05  $85.65 $134.28  $101.53  $124.41  $91.51 

In March 2015, the Board of Directors authorized an additional $100 million for stock repurchase under Chemed’s existing share repurchase program. We currently have $82.0$63.8 million of authorization remaining under this share repurchase plan.

Of the $18.2 million and $48.0 million in repurchases made during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 respectively, $11.3 million was paid for in October 2015. Amounts repurchased but settled subsequent to the end of the periods are considered non-cash financing activities and excluded from the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.
 
 
-13--12-

 

15.   Recent Accounting Statements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers” which provides additional guidance to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue.  The standard will also be used to develop a common revenue standard for removing inconsistencies and weaknesses, improve comparability, provide more useful information to users through improved disclosure requirements, and simplify the preparation of financial statements.  The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.  We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on our existing revenue recognition policies and disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “ASU No. 2014-15 - Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern”.   ASU 2014-15 is intended to define management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. This guidance is effective for us for the annual period ending December 31, 2016 and interim periods thereafter. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, “ASU No. 2015-03 – Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”.  ASU 2015-03 is intended to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs.  Under the new guidance, debt issuance costs will be presented as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt, consistent with the existing presentation of a debt discount.  This guidance is effective for us for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2015.  We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-15, “ASU No. 2015-15- Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line of Credit Arrangements”.  This Accounting Standards Update adds SEC paragraphs pursuant to the SEC Staff Accouncement at the June 18, 2015 Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) meeting.  Given the absence of authoritative guidance within Update 2015-03 for debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements, the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement.  We do not expect this interpretation to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 

16.   Business Combinations

In the first sixnine months of 2015, we completed two business combinations within our Roto-Rooter segment for $6.6 million in cash to increase our market penetration in Omaha, Nebraska and Scranton, Pennsylvania.  A substantial portion of this aggregate purchase price was allocated to goodwill.  The operating results of these business combinations have been included in our results of operations since the acquisition date and are not material for the three and six-monthnine-month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015 nor for the comparable prior year periods.

Shown below is movement in Goodwill (in thousands):

  Vitas  Roto-Rooter  Total 
Balance at January 1, 2014 $328,450  $138,421  $466,871 
Business combinations  -   198   198 
Foreign currency adjustments  -   (198)  (198)
Program closing  (149)  -   (149)
Balance at December 31, 2014 $328,301  $138,421  $466,722 
Business combinations  -   5,944   5,944 
Foreign currency adjustments  -   (259)  (259)
Balance at September 30, 2015 $328,301  $144,106  $472,407 
 
 
-14--13-

 

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Executive Summary
We operate through our two wholly-owned subsidiaries, VITAS Healthcare Corporation and Roto-Rooter Group, Inc.  VITAS focuses on hospice care that helps make terminally ill patients’ final days as comfortable as possible.  Through its teams of doctors, nurses, home health aides, social workers, clergy and volunteers, VITAS provides direct medical services to patients, as well as spiritual and emotional counseling to both patients and their families.  Roto-Rooter’s services are focused on providing plumbing, drain cleaning, water restoration and other related services to both residential and commercial customers.  Through its network of company-owned branches, independent contractors and franchisees, Roto-Rooter offers plumbing and drain cleaning service to over 90% of the U.S. population.

The following is a summary of the key operating results (in thousands except per share amounts):
  Three months ended June 30,  Six months ended June 30, 
  2015  2014  2015  2014 
Service revenues and sales $381,921  $360,182  $758,573  $718,482 
Net income $26,975  $24,363  $51,512  $44,937 
Diluted EPS $1.55  $1.36  $2.96  $2.48 
Adjusted net income $29,716  $26,580  $56,547  $50,293 
Adjusted diluted EPS $1.71  $1.50  $3.25  $2.81 
Adjusted EBITDA $57,689  $52,213  $110,538  $99,885 
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of revenue  15.1%  14.5%  14.6%  13.9%
 
  Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
  2015  2014  2015  2014 
Service revenues and sales $386,226  $358,389  $1,144,799  $1,076,871 
Net income $28,833  $24,585  $80,345  $69,522 
Diluted EPS $1.65  $1.39  $4.61  $3.87 
Adjusted net income $30,934  $26,058  $87,481  $76,351 
Adjusted diluted EPS $1.78  $1.48  $5.02  $4.28 
Adjusted EBITDA $59,410  $50,946  $169,948  $150,831 
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of revenue  15.4%  14.2%  14.8%  14.0%

Adjusted net income, adjusted diluted EPS, earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures derived in accordance with GAAP.  We provide non-GAAP measures to help readers evaluate our operating results, compare our operating performance with that of similar companies that have different capital structures and help evaluate our ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditure and working capital requirements.  Our non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable measures presented in accordance with GAAP.  A reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures are presented on pages 28-30.26-28.

For the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015, the increase in consolidated service revenues and sales was driven by a 9.7%an 8.8% increase at Roto-Rooter and a 4.7%7.4% increase at VITAS.  The increase in service revenues at Roto-Rooter was driven primarily by an increase in the water restoration business line as well as an increase in plumbing revenue. Water restoration is the remediation or removal of water and humidity after a flood.all major service lines.  The increase in service revenues at VITAS was a result of Medicare reimbursement rates increasing 1.4%, a 5.1%7.4% increase in days of care, offset by geographical and level of care mix shift.  Consolidated net income increased 10.7%17.3% due to higher revenues at both VITAS and Roto-Rooter combined with leveraging our current infrastructure resulting in operating costs growing at a slower rate than revenue.   Diluted EPS increased 14.0%18.7% as a result of the increase in net income as well as a lower number of shares outstanding.  Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of revenue increased 0.6%1.2%.   See page 3129 for additional VITAS operating metrics.

For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015, the increase in consolidated service revenues and sales was driven by a 9.5%9.3% increase at Roto-Rooter and a 4.1%5.2% increase at VITAS.  The increase in service revenues at Roto-Rooter was driven primarily by an increase in the water restoration business line as well as an increase in plumbing revenue.  The increase in service revenues at VITAS was a result of Medicare reimbursement rates increasing 1.4%, a 4.3%5.4% increase in days of care offset by level of care and geographical mix shift.  Consolidated net income increased 14.6%15.6% due to higher revenues at both VITAS and Roto-Rooter combined with leveraging our current infrastructure resulting in operating costs growing at a slower rate than revenue.   Diluted EPS increased 19.4%19.1% as a result of the increase in net income as well as a lower number of shares outstanding.  Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of revenue increased 0.7%0.8%.   See page 3129 for additional VITAS operating metrics.

VITAS expects its full-year 2015 revenue growth, prior to Medicare cap, to be in the range of 4.0% to 5.0%.  Admissions in 2015 are estimated to increase 4.0% to 5.0%.  Adjusted EBITDA margin, prior to Medicare cap, is estimated to be 14.0% to 15.0%.  Medicare cap billing limitations are estimated to be $2.8$1.0 million in 2015. Roto-Rooter expects full-year 2015 revenue growth of 5.0%6.0% to 6.0%7.0%.  The revenue estimate is a result of continued expansion in water restoration services and increased job pricing of approximately 1.0%. Adjusted EBITDA margin for 2015 is estimated in the range of 19.5% to 20.0%.  We anticipate that our operating income and cash flows will be sufficient to operate our businesses and meet any commitments for the foreseeable future.
 
 
-15--14-

 

Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Material changes in the balance sheet accounts from December 31, 2014 to JuneSeptember 30, 2015 include the following:

 An $18.6A $24.3 million increase in cash due to cash generated by operations and an increase in borrowings on our revolving line of credit partially offset by treasury stock purchases, capital expenditures and cash dividends.
•  A $5.5$5.9 million decreaseincrease in accounts in accounts receivable.  See additional discussion below.properties and equipment due mainly to expenditures related to the water restoration business line at Roto-Rooter.
•  A $5.8$5.7 million increase in goodwill due to two acquisitions at Roto-Rooter.
•  A $7.5$5.6 million decreaseincrease in accounts payable due to timing of payments.
•  A $5.8$5.1 million decrease in income taxes due to timing of payments.
An $8.8 million increase in accrued compensation due primarily to timing of payroll payments.
A $10.6 million decrease in long-term debt due primarily to payments made.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $24.5$62.1 million primarily as a result of higher net income, payment of litigation settlements in 2014 that did not recur in 2015 and the timing of other disbursements.  Management continually evaluates cash utilization alternatives, including share repurchase, debt repurchase, acquisitions and increased dividends to determine the most beneficial use of available capital resources.

We have issued $36.6 million in standby letters of credit as of JuneSeptember 30, 2015, for insurance purposes.  Issued letters of credit reduce our available credit under the revolving credit agreement.  As of JuneSeptember 30, 2015, we have approximately $248.4$268.4 million of unused lines of credit available and eligible to be drawn down under our revolving credit facility. Management believes its liquidity and sources of capital are satisfactory for the Company’s needs in the foreseeable future.

Significant changes in our accounts receivable balances are driven mainly by the timing of payments received from the Federal government at our VITAS subsidiary.  We typically receive a payment in excess of $35.0 million from the Federal government from hospice services every other Friday.  The timing of period end will have a significant impact on the accounts receivable at VITAS.  These changes generally normalize over a two year period, as cash flow variations in one year are offset in the following year.

Commitments and Contingencies
Collectively, the terms of our credit agreements require us to meet various financial covenants, to be tested quarterly.  We are in compliance with all financial and other debt covenants as of JuneSeptember 30, 2015 and anticipate remaining in compliance throughout 2015.the foreseeable future.

The VITAS segment of the Company’s business operates in a heavily-regulated industry.  As a result, the Company is subjected to inquiries and investigations by various government agencies, as well as to lawsuits, including qui tam actions.  The following sections describe the various ongoing material lawsuits and investigations of which the Company is currently aware.  It is not possible at this time for us to estimate either the timing or outcome of any of those matters, or whether any potential loss, or range of potential losses, is probable or estimable.
In June 2011, the U.S. Attorney provided the Company with a partially unsealed qui tam complaint filed under seal in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas,  United States, et al. ex rel. Urick v. VITAS HME Solutions, Inc. et al., 5:08-cv-0663 (“Urick”).  The U.S. Attorney filed a notice in May 2012 stating that it had decided not to intervene in the case at that time but indicating that it continues to investigate the allegations.  In June 2012, the complaint was unsealed.  The complaint asserts violations of the federal False Claims Act and the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act based on allegations of a conspiracy to submit to Medicare and Medicaid false claims involving hospice services for ineligible patients, unnecessary medical supplies, failing to satisfy certain prerequisites for payment, and altering patient records, including backdating patient revocations.  The suit was brought by Barbara Urick, a then registered nurse in VITAS’s San Antonio program, against VITAS, certain of its affiliates, and several former VITAS employees, including physicians Justo Cisneros and Antonio Cavasos and nurses Sally Schwenk, Diane Anest, and Edith Reed.  In September 2012 and July 2013, the plaintiff dismissed all claims against the individual defendants.  The complaint was served on the VITAS entities on April 12, 2013.
Also in June 2011, the U.S. Attorney provided the Company with a partially unsealed qui tam complaint filed under seal in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, United States, et al. ex rel. Spottiswood v. Chemed Corp., 1:07-cv-4566 (“Spottiswood”).  In April 2012, the complaint was unsealed.  The U.S. Attorney and Attorney General for the State of Illinois filed notices in April and May 2012, respectively, stating that they had decided not to intervene in the case at that time but indicating that they continue to investigate the allegations.  Plaintiff filed an amended complaint in November 2012.  The complaint asserts violations of the federal False Claims Act and the Illinois Whistleblower Reward and Protection Act based on allegations that VITAS fraudulently billed Medicare and Medicaid for providing unwarranted continuous care services.  The suit was brought by Laura Spottiswood, a former part-time pool registered nurse at VITAS, against Chemed, VITAS, and a VITAS affiliate.  The complaint was served on the defendants on April 12, 2013.  On May 29 and June 4, 2013, respectively, the Court granted the government’s motion to partially intervene in Spottiswood and in Urick on the allegations that VITAS submitted or caused to be submitted false or fraudulent claims for continuous care and routine home care on behalf of certain ineligible Medicare beneficiaries.  The Court also transferred them to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri under docket Nos. 4:13-cv-505 and 4:13-cv-563, respectively.
-16-

 
On May 2, 2013, the government filed a False Claims Act complaint against the Company and certain of its hospice-related subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, United States v. VITAS Hospice Services, LLC, et al., No. 4:13-cv-00449-BCW (the “2013 Action”).  Prior to that date, the Company received various subpoenas from the U.S. Department of Justice and OIG that have been previously disclosed.  The 2013 Action alleges that, since at least 2002, VITAS, and since 2004, the Company, submitted or caused the submission of false claims to the Medicare program by (a) billing Medicare for continuous home care services when the patients were not eligible, the services were not provided, or the medical care was inappropriate, and (b) billing Medicare for patients who were not eligible for the Medicare hospice benefit because they did not have a life expectancy of six months or less if their illnesses ran their normal course.  This complaint seeks treble damages, statutory penalties, and the costs of the action, plus interest.   The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on September 24, 2013.  On August 1, 2013,September 30, 2014, the Court denied the motion, except to the extent that claims were filed before July 24, 2002.  On November 13, 2014, the government filed its Firsta Second Amended Complaint in the 2013 Action.Complaint.  The FirstSecond Amended Complaint changed and supplemented some of the allegations, but did not otherwise expand the causes of action or the nature of the relief sought against VITAS.  The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on September 24, 2013.  The Court denied the motion, except to the extent that claims were filed before July 24, 2002, on September 30, 2014. 

On May 6, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, at the request of the government, unsealed a qui tam complaint against VITAS and VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, United States ex rel. Charles Gonzales v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation, et al., CV 12-0761-R (“Gonzales”).  The case was transferred from the Central District of California to the Western District of Missouri under docket No. 4:13-cv-344.  The government partially intervened in Gonzales.  The Gonzales complaint alleges that VITAS’ Los Angeles program falsely certified and recertified patients as eligible for the Medicare Hospice Benefit.  It alleges violations of the False Claims Act and seeks treble damages, civil penalties, recovery of costs, attorneys’ fees and expenses, and pre- and post-judgment interest.  

On September 25, 2013, the Court granted a joint motion by the government, the relators, and VITAS to consolidate the Spottiswood,  Urick, and  Gonzales complaints with the 2013 Action.  As a result, the First Amended Complaint will govern the consolidated federal claims brought by the United States and the relators for all purposes.  The relators and VITAS have stipulated that certain non-intervened claims will not be pursued by the relators.  The Spottiswood relator filed an action under the Illinois False Claims Act, The State of Illinois ex rel. Laura Spottiswood v. Chemed Corporation, et al., No. 14 L 2786 in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois on March 6, 2014.  The Court granted the parties’ joint motion to placefile the Second Amended Complaint on July 24, 2015.  VITAS filed its Answer to the Second Amended Complaint on August 11, 2015.  The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the probability of loss or range of loss at this case on its stay calendar, pending resolution of the 2013 Action.time.
-15-


VITAS has also received document subpoenas in related state matters.  In February 2010, VITAS received a civil investigative demand (“CID”) from the Texas Attorney General seeking documents from January 1, 2002 through the dateFor additional procedural history of the CID,this litigation, please refer to our prior quarterly and interrogatory responses in connection with an investigation of possible fraudulent submission of Medicaid claims for non-qualifying patients and fraudulent shifting of costs from VITAS to the State of Texas and the United States.  The CID requested similar information sought by prior Department of Justice subpoenas, including policy and procedure manuals and information concerning Medicare and Medicaid billing, patient statistics and sales and marketing practices, together with information concerning record-keeping and retention practices, and medical records concerning 117 patients.  In September 2010, VITAS received a third CID from the Texas Attorney General seeking additional documents concerning business plans and results, revocation forms for certain patients, and electronic documents of 10 current and former employees.  In July 2012, VITAS received an investigative subpoena from the Florida Attorney General seeking documents previously produced in the course of prior government investigations as well as, for the period January 1, 2007 through the date of production, billing records and procedures; information concerning business results, plans, and strategies; documents concerning patient eligibility for hospice care; and certain information concerning employees and their compensation.

annual filings. The costs incurred related to U.S. v. Vitas and related regulatory matters were $1.4$1.2 million and $410,000$450,000 for the quarters ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015 and 2014, the net costs were $2.7$3.8 million and $1.2$1.6 million, respectively.

In November 2013, two shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed against the Company’s current and former directors, as well as certain of its officers, both of which are covered by the Company’s commercial insurance.  On November 6, 2013, KBC Asset Management NV filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, KBC Asset Management NV, derivatively on behalf of Chemed Corp. v. McNamara, et al., No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (D. Del.).  It sued Kevin McNamara, Joel Gemunder, Patrick Grace, Thomas Hutton, Walter Krebs, Andrea Lindell, Thomas Rice, Donald Saunders, Arthur Tucker, Jr., George Walsh III, Frank Wood, Timothy O’Toole, David Williams and Ernest Mrozek, together with the Company as nominal defendant.  Plaintiff alleges that since at least 2004, Chemed, through VITAS, has submitted or caused the submission of false claims to Medicare.  The suit alleges a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the individual defendants, and seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees.
-17-


On November 14, 2013, Mildred A. North filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, North, derivatively on behalf of Chemed Corp. v. Kevin McNamara, el al., No. 13 Civ. 833 (MDB) (S.D. Ohio).  She sued Kevin McNamara, David Williams, Timothy O’Toole, Joel Gemunder, Patrick Grace, Walter Krebs, Andrea Lindell, Thomas Rice, Donald Saunders, George Walsh III, Frank Wood and Thomas Hutton, together with the Company as nominal defendant.  Plaintiff alleges that, between February 2010 and the present, the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties as officers and directors of Chemed by, among other things, (a) allegedly causing VITAS to submit improper and ineligible claims to Medicare and Medicaid; and (b) allegedly misrepresenting the state of Chemed’s internal controls.  The suit alleges claims for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control and gross mismanagement against the individual defendants.  The complaint also alleges unjust enrichment and insider trading against Messrs. McNamara, Williams and O’Toole.  Plaintiff seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees.

On January 29, 2014 defendants in North filed a motion to transfer that case to Delaware under 28 U.S.C § 1404(a). On February 12, 2014, defendants in KBC filed a motion to dismiss that case pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23.1 and 12(b)(6).  On September 19, 2014, the Ohio court granted defendants’ motion to transfer North to Delaware.  Following that decision and in light of that transfer, on September 29, 2014, the Delaware court denied without prejudice defendants’ motion to dismiss KBC, and referred both cases to Magistrate Judge Burke.

On October 15, 2014, Plaintiff KBC filed a motion to consolidate KBC with North.  On February 2, 2015 the court granted the motion for consolidation in full, appointing Plaintiff KBC the sole lead plaintiff and its counsel, the sole lead and liaison counsel.  The court ordered that both cases will proceed under the caption In re Chemed Corp. Shareholder and Derivative Litigation, No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (CJB) (D. Del.).  Plaintiff KBC has designated its pending complaint as the operative complaint in the consolidated proceedings.  Defendants have renewed their motion to dismiss the claims and allegations.

The Company intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in each of the above lawsuits.  Regardless of the outcome of any of the preceding matters, responding to the subpoenas and dealing with the various regulatory agencies and opposing parties can adversely affect us through defense costs, potential payments, diversion of management time, and related publicity.  Although the Company intends to defend them vigorously, there can be no assurance that those suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.

-16-

Results of Operations
Three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015 versus 2014 - Consolidated Results
Our service revenues and sales for the secondthird quarter of 2015 increased 6.0%7.8% versus services and sales revenues for the secondthird quarter of 2014.  Of this increase, $12.4$19.6 million was attributable to VITAS and a $9.3$8.2 million increase was attributable to Roto-Rooter.  The following chart shows the components of those changes (in thousands):
  Increase/(Decrease) 
  Amount  Percent 
VITAS      
Routine homecare $17,987   8.8 
Continuous care  (122)  (0.3)
General inpatient  (741)  (3.0)
Medicare cap  2,500   100.0 
Roto-Rooter        
Plumbing  3,869   9.4 
Drain cleaning  1,167   3.6 
Water restoration  2,843   53.5 
Contractor operations  368   4.2 
Other  (34)  (0.7)
Total $27,837   7.8 

  Increase/(Decrease)
  Amount Percent
VITAS     
Routine homecare $ 12,956  6.5
Continuous care   (131)  (0.3)
General inpatient   (534)  (2.1)
Medicare cap   143  100.0
Roto-Rooter     
Plumbing   3,531  8.2
Drain cleaning   (295)  (0.8)
Water restoration   5,756  169.3
Contractor operations   337  3.7
Other   (24)  (0.5)
Total $ 21,739  6.0
-18-

The increase in VITAS’ revenues for the secondthird quarter of 2015 versus the secondthird quarter of 2014 was a combination of Medicare reimbursement rates increasing approximately 1.4% and a 5.1%7.4% increase in days of care offset by level of care and geographical mix shift.

Days of care during the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30 were as follows:
  Days of Care  Increase/(Decrease) 
  2015  2014  Percent 
          
Routine homecare  1,357,688   1,256,844   8.0 
Continuous care  51,652   51,642   - 
General inpatient  37,121   38,347   (3.2)
Total days of care  1,446,461   1,346,833   7.4 


  Days of Care 
  2015  2014  Percent 
          
Routine homecare  1,300,479   1,231,741   5.6 
Continuous care  51,250   51,647   (0.8)
General inpatient  39,006   39,430   (1.1)
Total days of care  1,390,735   1,322,818   5.1 
Over 90% of VITAS’ service revenues for the period were from Medicare and Medicaid.

The increase in plumbing revenues for the secondthird quarter of 2015 versus 2014 is attributable to a 5.1%7.3% increase in job count and a 3.1%2.1% increase in a combination of price and service mix shift.  Drain cleaning revenues for the secondthird quarter of 2015 versus 2014 reflect a 4.4% decrease1.3% increase in the number of jobs performed offset bycombined with a 3.6% increase in a combination of price and service mix shift.shift of 2.3%.  Water restoration increased 169.3%53.5% as a result of continued expansion of this service offering into other Roto-Rooter locations.  Water restoration is the remediation or removal of water and humidity after a flood. Contractor operations increased 3.7%4.2% and Other Roto-Rooter revenue decreased 0.5%0.7%.
 
The consolidated gross margin was 29.1%29.6% in the secondthird quarter of 2015 as compared with 28.6%28.4% in the secondthird quarter of 2014.  On a segment basis, VITAS’ gross margin was 21.9%23.3% in the secondthird quarter of 2015 as compared with 22.0%, in the third quarter of 2014.  This increase was the mainly the result of a $2.5 million charge in Medicare cap in 2014 versus none in 2015 and favorable health insurance claims experience. The Roto-Rooter segment’s gross margin was 47.1% for the third quarter of 2015, essentially flat when compared to the secondthird quarter of 2014.  The Roto-Rooter segment’s gross margin was 48.0% for the second quarter of 2015 as compared with 46.8% for the second quarter of 2014.  The gross margin increase was mainly the result of favorable health insurance experience during the second quarter of 2015.
 
-17-

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) comprise (in thousands):

 Three months ended June 30,  Three months ended September 30, 
 2015  2014  2015  2014 
SG&A expenses before the impact of market gains of deferred compensation plans,      
long-term incentive compensation, and OIG investigation expenses $54,627  $51,976 
SG&A expenses before the impact of market gains/(losses) of deferred compensation      
plans, long-term incentive compensation, and OIG investigation expenses $55,010  $51,218 
Long-term incentive compensation  1,457   613   1,364   1,002 
Expenses related to OIG investigation  1,412   410   1,151   450 
Market value gains related to assets held in deferred compensation trusts  498   650 
Impact of market value gains/(losses) related to assets held in deferred        
compensation trusts  (2,328)  896 
Total SG&A expenses $57,994  $53,649  $55,197  $53,566 

SG&A expenses before long-term incentive compensation, expenses related to OIG investigation and the impact of market gainsgains/(losses) of deferred compensation plans for the secondthird quarter of 2015 were up 5.1%7.4% when compared to the secondthird quarter of 2014.  The increase was mainly a result of the increase in variable expenses caused by increased revenue as well as normal salary increases, higher incentive compensation costs and higher bad debt expense in 2015.
-19-


 
Other incomeincome/(expense) - net comprise (in thousands):

 Three months ended June 30,  Three months ended September 30, 
 2015  2014  2015  2014 
Market value gains on assets held in deferred      
compensation trusts $498  $650 
Market value gains/(losses) on assets held in      
deferred compensation trusts $(2,328) $896 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment  (63)  (48)  (116)  (167)
Interest income - net  86   58   77   (13)
Other  15   96   12   (11)
Total other income - net $536  $756 
Total other income/(expense) - net $(2,355) $705 

Our effective income tax rate was 38.9%38.5% in the secondthird quarter of 2015 essentially equal to the secondthird quarter of 2014.

Net income for both periods included the following after-tax items/adjustments that reduced or increased after-tax earnings (in thousands):
 Three months ended June 30,  Three months ended September 30, 
 2015  2014  2015  2014 
VITAS            
Expenses related to OIG investigation $(868) $(254) $(711) $(279)
Roto-Rooter                
Acquisition expenses  (80)  -   (18)  - 
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   (20)
Recoveries related to litigation settlements  -   143 
Corporate                
Stock option expense  (849)  (722)  (509)  (615)
Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt  -   (714)
Long-term incentive compensation  (921)  (388)  (863)  (634)
Expenses related to securities litigation  (23)  (119)  -   (88)
Total $(2,741) $(2,217) $(2,101) $(1,473)
-18-

Three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015 versus 2014 - Segment Results

The change in after-tax earnings for the secondthird quarter of 2015 versus the secondthird quarter of 2014 is due to (in thousands):

 Increase/(Decrease)Increase/(Decrease) 
 Amount  PercentAmount  Percent 
VITAS $908   4.3 $4,130   19.1 
Roto-Rooter  1,434   13.4  1,113   11.3 
Corporate  270   3.7  (995)  (14.5)
 $2,612   10.7 $4,248   17.3 

VITAS’ after-tax earnings were positively impacted in 2015 compared to 2014 by a $12.4$19.6 million increase in revenue.   After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue in the third quarter of 2015 were 7.9%9.0%, essentially equal toan increase of 0.9% over the secondthird quarter of 2014.

Roto-Rooter’s after-tax earnings were positively impacted in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily by a $5.8$2.8 million revenue increase in Roto-Rooter’s water restoration line of business, and a $3.5$3.9 million increase in plumbing revenue and a $1.2 million increase in sewer and drain cleaning revenue.  After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue at Roto-Rooter in 2015 were 11.5%10.8% as compared to 11.1%10.6% in 2014.  This increase is largely the result of higher sales and gross profit in 2015, partially offset by higher SG&A expenses.  Favorable health insurance experience during the second quarter of 2015 contributed to the higher gross profit.
-20-


Results of Operations
SixNine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015 versus 2014 - Consolidated Results
Our service revenues and sales for the first sixnine months of 2015 increased 5.6%6.3% versus services and sales revenues for the first sixnine months of 2014.  Of this increase, $21.6$41.3 million was attributable to VITAS and an $18.5$26.7 million increase was attributable to Roto-Rooter.  The following chart shows the components of those changes (in thousands):

  Increase/(Decrease) 
  Amount  Percent 
VITAS      
Routine homecare $40,087   6.7 
Continuous care  (237)  (0.2)
General inpatient  (552)  (0.7)
Medicare cap  1,961   109.2 
Roto-Rooter        
Plumbing  8,395   6.5 
Drain cleaning  (137)  (0.1)
Water restoration  17,539   171.4 
Contractor operations  1,146   4.3 
Other  (274)  (1.7)
Total $67,928   6.3 

  Increase/(Decrease)
  Amount Percent
VITAS     
Routine homecare $ 22,100  5.6
Continuous care   (115)  (0.2)
General inpatient   189  0.4
Medicare cap   (539)  (76.6)
Roto-Rooter     
Plumbing   4,525  5.1
Drain cleaning   (1,304)  (1.8)
Water restoration   14,695  298.6
Contractor operations   778  4.3
Other   (238)  (2.3)
Total $ 40,091  5.6
The increase in VITAS’ revenues for the first sixnine months of 2015 versus the first sixnine months of 2014 was a combination of Medicare reimbursement rates increasing approximately 1.4% and a 4.3%5.4% increase in days of care offset by level of care and geographical mix shift.  In the first sixnine months of 2015, VITAS recorded a positive revenue adjustment of $165,000 related to one program’s Medicare cap liability recorded in the fourth quarter of 2014. This compares to a positivenegative revenue adjustment of $704,000$1.8 million recorded in the first sixnine months of 2014.
 
-19-


Days of care for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30 were as follows:

 Days of Care  Days of Care  Increase/(Decrease) 
 2015  2014  Percent  2015  2014  Percent 
                  
Routine homecare  2,542,212   2,429,079   4.7   3,899,900   3,685,923   5.8 
Continuous care  104,090   103,477   0.6   155,742   155,119   0.4 
General inpatient  78,579   78,758   (0.2)  115,700   117,105   (1.2)
Total days of care  2,724,881   2,611,314   4.3   4,171,342   3,958,147   5.4 

Over 90% of VITAS’ service revenues for the period were from Medicare and Medicaid.

The increase in plumbing revenues for the first sixnine months of 2015 versus 2014 is attributable to a 1.5% decreasecombination of a 1.3% increase in job count, offset byand a 6.6%5.2% increase in a combination of price and service mix shift.  Drain cleaning revenues for the first sixnine months of 2015 versus 2014 reflect a 5.3%3.3% decrease in the number of jobs performed, offset by a 3.5%3.2% increase in a combination of price and service mix shift.  Water restoration increased 298.6%171.4% as a result of continued expansion of this service offering into other Roto-Rooter locations.  Water restoration is the remediation or removal of water and humidity after a flood. Contractor operations increased 4.3% and Other Roto-Rooter revenue decreased 2.3%1.7%.
 
The consolidated gross margin was 28.9%29.1% in the first sixnine months of 2015 as compared with 28.3% in the first sixnine months of 2014.  On a segment basis, VITAS’ gross margin was 21.6%22.2% in the first sixnine months of 2015 essentially equal toas compared with 21.7% in the first sixnine months of 2014.  This increase is mainly the result of favorable health insurance claims experience. The Roto-Rooter segment’s gross margin was 47.6%47.5% for the first sixnine months of 2015 as compared with 46.6%46.7% for the first sixnine months of 2014.  The gross margin increase was mainly the result of favorable health and casualty insurance experience during the first sixnine months of 2015.
 
-21-

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) comprise (in thousands):

 Six months ended June 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
 2015  2014  2015  2014 
SG&A expenses before the impact of market gains of deferred compensation      
SG&A expenses before the impact of market gains/(losses) of deferred compensation      
plans, long-term incentive compensation, and OIG investigation expenses $110,057  $105,364  $165,067  $156,582 
Long-term incentive compensation  2,391   986   3,755   1,988 
Expenses related to OIG investigation  2,686   1,158   3,837   1,608 
Market value gains related to assets held in        
deferred compensation trusts  1,448   1,812 
Impact of market value gains/(losses) related to assets held in deferred        
compensation trusts  (880)  2,708 
Total SG&A expenses $116,582  $109,320  $171,779  $162,886 


SG&A expenses before long-term incentive compensation, expenses related to OIG investigation and the impact of market gainsgains/(losses) of deferred compensation plans for the first sixnine months of 2015 were up 4.5%5.4% when compared to the first sixnine months of 2014.  The increase was mainly a result of the increase in variable expenses caused by increased revenue as well as normal salary increases and higher bad debt expenses in 2015.
 
Other incomeincome/(expense) - net comprise (in thousands):
  Nine months ended September 30, 
  2015  2014 
Market value gains/(losses) on assets held in      
deferred compensation trusts $(880) $2,708 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment  (131)  (493)
Interest income - net  207   (5)
Other  (452)  67 
Total other income/(expense) - net $(1,256) $2,277 
 
  Six months ended June 30, 
  2015  2014 
Market value gains on assets held in deferred      
compensation trusts $1,448  $1,812 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment  (15)  (326)
Interest income - net  130   8 
Other  (464)  78 
Total other income - net $1,099  $1,572 

Our effective income tax rate was 38.9%38.8% in the first sixnine months of 2015, essentially equal to the first sixnine months of 2014.
 
-20-

Net income for both periods included the following after-tax items/adjustments to after-tax earnings (in thousands):
  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2015  2014 
VITAS      
Legal expenses of OIG investigation $(1,658) $(718)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   (70)
Acquisition expenses  -   (1)
Roto-Rooter        
Expenses related to litigation settlements  (3)  (137)
Acquisition expenses  (80)  - 
Corporate        
Stock option expense  (1,759)  (1,544)
Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt  -   (2,143)
Long-term incentive compensation  (1,512)  (624)
Expenses of securities litigation  (23)  (119)
Total $(5,035) $(5,356)
 
-22-

  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2015  2014 
VITAS      
Legal expenses of OIG investigation $(2,369) $(997)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   (70)
Acquisition expenses  -   (1)
Roto-Rooter        
Net expenses/(recoveries) related to litigation settlements  (3)  6 
Acquisition expenses  (98)  - 
Corporate        
Stock option expense  (2,268)  (2,159)
Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt  -   (2,143)
Long-term incentive compensation  (2,375)  (1,258)
Expenses of securities litigation  (23)  (207)
Total $(7,136) $(6,829)

SixNine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2015 versus 2014 - Segment Results

The change in after-tax earnings for the first sixnine months of 2015 versus the first sixnine months of 2014 is due to (in thousands):
 Increase/(Decrease) 
 Amount  Percent 
VITAS $6,194   10.2 
Roto-Rooter  4,523   14.8 
Corporate  106   0.5 
  $10,823   15.6 


  Increase/(Decrease) 
  Amount  Percent 
VITAS $2,065   5.3 
Roto-Rooter  3,410   16.4 
Corporate  1,100   7.4 
  $6,575   14.6 
VITAS’ after-tax earnings were positively impacted in 2015 compared to 2014 by a $21.6$41.3 million increase in revenue. After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue in 2015 were 7.5%8.0% as compared to 7.4%7.7% in 2014.

Roto-Rooter’s after-tax earnings were positively impacted in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily by a $14.7$17.5 million revenue increase in Roto-Rooter’s water restoration line of business and a $4.5an $8.4 million increase in plumbing revenue.  After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue at Roto-Rooter in 2015 were 11.4%11.2% as compared to 10.7% in 2014.  This increase is largely the result of higher sales and gross profit in 2015, partially offset by higher SG&A expenses.  Favorable casualty and health insurance experience during 2015 contributed to the higher gross profit.
-21-


CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(in thousands)(unaudited)
         
   
VITAS
   
Roto-Rooter
   
Corporate
  Chemed
Consolidated
 
2015 (a)            
Service revenues and sales $285,008  $101,218  $-  $386,226 
Cost of services provided and goods sold  218,528   53,561   -   272,089 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  22,241   27,437   5,519   55,197 
Depreciation  4,631   3,300   144   8,075 
Amortization  186   172   379   737 
Total costs and expenses  245,586   84,470   6,042   336,098 
Income/(loss) from operations  39,422   16,748   (6,042)  50,128 
Interest expense  (54)  (80)  (774)  (908)
Intercompany interest income/(expense)  1,979   858   (2,837)  - 
Other income/(expense)—net  (11)  (15)  (2,329)  (2,355)
Income/(expense) before income taxes  41,336   17,511   (11,982)  46,865 
Income taxes  (15,613)  (6,550)  4,131   (18,032)
Net income/(loss) $25,723  $10,961  $(7,851) $28,833 
                 
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands): 
               
   VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   
Chemed
Consolidated
 
Pretax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(813) $(813)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (1,364)  (1,364)
Acquisition expenses  -   (30)  -   (30)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (1,151)  -   -   (1,151)
Total $(1,151) $(30) $(2,177) $(3,358)
                 
   VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   
Chemed
Consolidated
 
After-tax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(509) $(509)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (863)  (863)
Acquisition expenses  -   (18)  -   (18)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (711)  -   -   (711)
Total $(711) $(18) $(1,372) $(2,101)
-22-


CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME 
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014 
(in thousands)(unaudited) 
          
         
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  
Chemed
Consolidated
 
2014 (a)            
Service revenues and sales $265,384  $93,005  $-  $358,389 
Cost of services provided and goods sold  207,105   49,340   -   256,445 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  20,224   25,682   7,660   53,566 
Depreciation  4,530   2,772   148   7,450 
Amortization  205   114   398   717 
Total costs and expenses  232,064   77,908   8,206   318,178 
Income/(loss) from operations  33,320   15,097   (8,206)  40,211 
Interest expense  (55)  (87)  (838)  (980)
Intercompany interest income/(expense)  1,660   760   (2,420)  - 
Other income/(expense)—net  (189)  (2)  896   705 
Income/(expense) before income taxes  34,736   15,768   (10,568)  39,936 
Income taxes  (13,143)  (5,920)  3,712   (15,351)
Net income/(loss) $21,593  $9,848  $(6,856) $24,585 
                 
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands): 
               
   VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   
Chemed
Consolidated
 
Pretax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(977) $(977)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (1,002)  (1,002)
Net recoveries related to litigation settlements  -   234   -   234 
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   (138)  (138)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (450)  -   -   (450)
Total $(450) $234  $(2,117) $(2,333)
                 
   VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   
Chemed
Consolidated
 
After-tax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(615) $(615)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (634)  (634)
Net recoveries related to litigation settlements  -   143   -   143 
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   (88)  (88)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (279)  -   -   (279)
Total $(279) $143  $(1,337) $(1,473)
 
-23-

 
 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(in thousands)(unaudited)
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME 
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 
(in thousands)(unaudited) 
         
        
              Chemed         
  VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   Consolidated  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Chemed
Consolidated
 
2015 (a)                            
Service revenues and sales $276,460  $105,461  $-  $381,921  $831,081  $313,718  $-  $1,144,799 
Cost of services provided and goods sold  215,778   54,885   -   270,663   646,801   164,836   -   811,637 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  22,237   28,241   7,516   57,994   66,449   84,439   20,891   171,779 
Depreciation  4,724   3,205   153   8,082   14,141   9,598   450   24,189 
Amortization  171   128   283   582   523   408   964   1,895 
Total costs and expenses  242,910   86,459   7,952   337,321   727,914   259,281   22,305   1,009,500 
Income/(loss) from operations  33,550   19,002   (7,952)  44,600   103,167   54,437   (22,305)  135,299 
Interest expense  (53)  (98)  (818)  (969)  (164)  (274)  (2,408)  (2,846)
Intercompany interest income/(expense)  1,755   805   (2,560)  -   5,461   2,501   (7,962)  - 
Other income/(expense)—net  49   (12)  499   536   (395)  19   (880)  (1,256)
Income/(expense) before income taxes  35,301   19,697   (10,831)  44,167   108,069   56,683   (33,555)  131,197 
Income taxes  (13,501)  (7,544)  3,853   (17,192)  (41,230)  (21,561)  11,939   (50,852)
Net income/(loss) $21,800  $12,153  $(6,978) $26,975  $66,839  $35,122  $(21,616) $80,345 
                                
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands): (a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):         
                            
              Chemed   VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   
Chemed
Consolidated
 
  VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   Consolidated 
Pretax benefit/(cost):
                                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(1,343) $(1,343) $-  $-  $(3,600) $(3,600)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (1,457)  (1,457)  -   -   (3,755)  (3,755)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   (5)  -   (5)
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   (37)  (37)  -   -   (37)  (37)
Acquisition expenses  -   (131)  -   (131)  -   (161)  -   (161)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (1,412)  -   -   (1,412)  (3,837)  -   -   (3,837)
Total $(1,412) $(131) $(2,837) $(4,380) $(3,837) $(166) $(7,392) $(11,395)
                                
                VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   Chemed
Consolidated
 
         
                
              Chemed 
  VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   Consolidated 
After-tax benefit/(cost):                                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(849) $(849) $-  $-  $(2,268) $(2,268)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (921)  (921)  -   -   (2,375)  (2,375)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   (3)  -   (3)
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   (23)  (23)  -   -   (23)  (23)
Acquisition expenses  -   (80)  -   (80)  -   (98)  -   (98)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (868)  -   -   (868)  (2,369)  -   -   (2,369)
Total $(868) $(80) $(1,793) $(2,741) $(2,369) $(101) $(4,666) $(7,136)
 
-24-

 
             
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME 
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 
(in thousands)(unaudited) 
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter   Corporate   Chemed
Consolidated
 
             
2014 (a)            
Service revenues and sales $264,026  $96,156  $-  $360,182 
Cost of services provided and goods sold  205,818   51,189   -   257,007 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  21,002   25,705   6,942   53,649 
Depreciation  4,564   2,561   147   7,272 
Amortization  205   137   393   735 
Total costs and expenses  231,589   79,592   7,482   318,663 
Income/(loss) from operations  32,437   16,564   (7,482)  41,519 
Interest expense  (57)  (111)  (2,261)  (2,429)
Intercompany interest income/(expense)  1,517   680   (2,197)  - 
Other income/(expense)—net  (95)  198   653   756 
Income/(expense) before income taxes  33,802   17,331   (11,287)  39,846 
Income taxes  (12,910)  (6,612)  4,039   (15,483)
Net income/(loss) $20,892  $10,719  $(7,248) $24,363 
                 
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands): 
                 
               Chemed 
   VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   Consolidated 
Pretax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(1,144) $(1,144)
Noncash impact of accounting for convertible debt  -   -   (1,130)  (1,130)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (613)  (613)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   (32)  -   (32)
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   (189)  (189)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (410)  -   -   (410)
Total $(410) $(32) $(3,076) $(3,518)
                 
                 
                 
   VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   Consolidated 
After-tax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(722) $(722)
Noncash impact of accounting for convertible debt  -   -   (714)  (714)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (388)  (388)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   (20)  -   (20)
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   (119)  (119)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (254)  -   -   (254)
Total $(254) $(20) $(1,943) $(2,217)
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014
(in thousands)(unaudited)
         
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  
Chemed
Consolidated
 
2014 (a)            
Service revenues and sales $789,822  $287,049  $-  $1,076,871 
Cost of services provided and goods sold  618,315   152,956   -   771,271 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  62,939   78,569   21,378   162,886 
Depreciation  13,709   7,732   430   21,871 
Amortization  829   397   1,235   2,461 
Total costs and expenses  695,792   239,654   23,043   958,489 
Income/(loss) from operations  94,030   47,395   (23,043)  118,382 
Interest expense  (167)  (295)  (6,762)  (7,224)
Intercompany interest income/(expense)  4,520   2,090   (6,610)  - 
Other income/(expense)—net  (577)  137   2,717   2,277 
Income/(expense) before income taxes  97,806   49,327   (33,698)  113,435 
Income taxes  (37,161)  (18,728)  11,976   (43,913)
Net income/(loss) $60,645  $30,599  $(21,722) $69,522 
                 
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):         
               
    VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   
Chemed
Consolidated
 
Pretax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(3,430) $(3,430)
Noncash impact of accounting for convertible debt  -   -   (3,389)  (3,389)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (1,988)  (1,988)
Net recoveries/(expenses) related to litigation settlements  (113)  9   -   (104)
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   (327)  (327)
Acquisition expenses  (1)  -   -   (1)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (1,608)  -   -   (1,608)
Total $(1,722) $9  $(9,134) $(10,847)
                 
   VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   
Chemed
Consolidated
 
After-tax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(2,159) $(2,159)
Noncash impact of accounting for convertible debt  -   -   (2,143)  (2,143)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (1,258)  (1,258)
Net recoveries/(expenses) related to litigation settlements  (70)  6   -   (64)
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   (207)  (207)
Acquisition expenses  (1)  -   -   (1)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (997)  -   -   (997)
Total $(1,068) $6  $(5,767) $(6,829)
 
 
-25-

 
 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME 
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 
(in thousands)(unaudited) 
          
         
            Chemed 
  VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate  Consolidated 
2015 (a)            
Service revenues and sales $546,073  $212,500  $-  $758,573 
Cost of services provided and goods sold  428,274   111,274   -   539,548 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  44,207   57,002   15,373   116,582 
Depreciation  9,509   6,299   306   16,114 
Amortization  338   236   584   1,158 
Total costs and expenses  482,328   174,811   16,263   673,402 
Income/(loss) from operations  63,745   37,689   (16,263)  85,171 
Interest expense  (110)  (194)  (1,634)  (1,938)
Intercompany interest income/(expense)  3,482   1,642   (5,124)  - 
Other income/(expense)—net  (384)  35   1,448   1,099 
Income/(expense) before income taxes  66,733   39,172   (21,573)  84,332 
Income taxes  (25,617)  (15,011)  7,808   (32,820)
Net income/(loss) $41,116  $24,161  $(13,765) $51,512 
                 
                 
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):         
               
               Chemed 
   VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   Consolidated 
Pretax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(2,787) $(2,787)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (2,391)  (2,391)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   (5)  -   (5)
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   (37)  (37)
Acquisition expenses  -   (131)  -   (131)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (2,686)  -   -   (2,686)
Total $(2,686) $(136) $(5,215) $(8,037)
                 
               
                 
               Chemed 
   VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   Consolidated 
After-tax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(1,759) $(1,759)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (1,512)  (1,512)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   (3)  -   (3)
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   (23)  (23)
Acquisition expenses  -   (80)  -   (80)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (1,658)  -   -   (1,658)
Total $(1,658) $(83) $(3,294) $(5,035)
Unaudited Consolidating Summary and Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies    
(in thousands)         Chemed 
For the three months ended September 30, 2015VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated 
             
Net income/(loss) $25,723  $10,961  $(7,851) $28,833 
Add/(deduct):                
Interest expense  54   80   774   908 
Income taxes  15,613   6,550   (4,131)  18,032 
Depreciation  4,631   3,300   144   8,075 
Amortization  186   172   379   737 
EBITDA  46,207   21,063   (10,685)  56,585 
Add/(deduct):                
Intercompany interest expense/(income)  (1,979)  (858)  2,837   - 
Interest income  (68)  (9)  -   (77)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  1,151   -   -   1,151 
Acquisition expenses  -   30   -   30 
Advertising cost adjustment  -   (456)  -   (456)
Stock option expense  -   -   813   813 
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   1,364   1,364 
Adjusted EBITDA $45,311  $19,770  $(5,671) $59,410 
                 
             Chemed 
For the three months ended September 30, 2014VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated 
                 
Net income/(loss) $21,593  $9,848  $(6,856) $24,585 
Add/(deduct):                
Interest expense  55   87   838   980 
Income taxes  13,143   5,920   (3,712)  15,351 
Depreciation  4,530   2,772   148   7,450 
Amortization  205   114   398   717 
EBITDA  39,526   18,741   (9,184)  49,083 
Add/(deduct):                
Intercompany interest expense/(income)  (1,660)  (760)  2,420   - 
Interest income  23   (9)  (1)  13 
Expenses related to OIG investigation  450   -   -   450 
Advertising cost adjustment  -   (483)  -   (483)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   (234)  -   (234)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   1,002   1,002 
Stock option expense  -   -   977   977 
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   138   138 
Adjusted EBITDA $38,339  $17,255  $(4,648) $50,946 
 
 
-26-

 

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME 
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 
(in thousands)(unaudited) 
          
         
             
               Chemed 
   VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   Consolidated 
2014 (a)                
Service revenues and sales $524,438  $194,044  $-  $718,482 
Cost of services provided and goods sold  411,210   103,616   -   514,826 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  42,716   52,887   13,717   109,320 
Depreciation  9,178   4,961   282   14,421 
Amortization  624   282   838   1,744 
Total costs and expenses  463,728   161,746   14,837   640,311 
Income/(loss) from operations  60,710   32,298   (14,837)  78,171 
Interest expense  (112)  (208)  (5,924)  (6,244)
Intercompany interest income/(expense)  2,860   1,330   (4,190)  - 
Other income/(expense)—net  (388)  139   1,821   1,572 
Income/(expense) before income taxes  63,070   33,559   (23,130)  73,499 
Income taxes  (24,019)  (12,808)  8,265   (28,562)
Net income/(loss) $39,051  $20,751  $(14,865) $44,937 
                 
                 
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):         
               
               Chemed 
   VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   Consolidated 
Pretax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(2,453) $(2,453)
Noncash impact of accounting for convertible debt  -   -   (3,389)  (3,389)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (986)  (986)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  (113)  (225)  -   (338)
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   (189)  (189)
Acquisition expenses  (1)  -   -   (1)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (1,158)  -   -   (1,158)
Total $(1,272) $(225) $(7,017) $(8,514)
                 
               
                 
               Chemed 
   VITAS   Roto-Rooter   Corporate   Consolidated 
After-tax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(1,544) $(1,544)
Noncash impact of accounting for convertible debt  -   -   (2,143)  (2,143)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (624)  (624)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  (70)  (137)  -   (207)
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   (119)  (119)
Acquisition expenses  (1)  -   -   (1)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (718)  -   -   (718)
Total $(789) $(137) $(4,430) $(5,356)
Unaudited Consolidating Summary and Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies    
(in thousands)         Chemed 
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated 
             
Net income/(loss) $66,839  $35,122  $(21,616) $80,345 
Add/(deduct):                
Interest expense  164   274   2,408   2,846 
Income taxes  41,230   21,561   (11,939)  50,852 
Depreciation  14,141   9,598   450   24,189 
Amortization  523   408   964   1,895 
EBITDA  122,897   66,963   (29,733)  160,127 
Add/(deduct):                
Intercompany interest expense/(income)  (5,461)  (2,501)  7,962   - 
Interest income  (179)  (27)  (1)  (207)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  3,837   -   -   3,837 
Acquisition expenses  -   161   -   161 
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   5   -   5 
Advertising cost adjustment  -   (1,367)  -   (1,367)
Stock option expense  -   -   3,600   3,600 
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   3,755   3,755 
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   37   37 
Adjusted EBITDA $121,094  $63,234  $(14,380) $169,948 
                 
             Chemed 
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated 
                 
Net income/(loss) $60,645  $30,599  $(21,722) $69,522 
Add/(deduct):                
Interest expense  167   295   6,762   7,224 
Income taxes  37,161   18,728   (11,976)  43,913 
Depreciation  13,709   7,732   430   21,871 
Amortization  829   397   1,235   2,461 
EBITDA  112,511   57,751   (25,271)  144,991 
Add/(deduct):                
Intercompany interest expense/(income)  (4,520)  (2,090)  6,610   - 
Interest income  43   (28)  (10)  5 
Expenses related to OIG investigation  1,608   -   -   1,608 
Acquisition expenses  1   -   -   1 
Advertising cost adjustment  -   (1,623)  -   (1,623)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  113   (9)  -   104 
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   1,988   1,988 
Stock option expense  -   -   3,430   3,430 
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   327   327 
Adjusted EBITDA $109,756  $54,001  $(12,926) $150,831 
 
 
-27-

 

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME 
(in thousands, except per share data)(unaudited) 
             
  Three Months Ended September 30,  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2015  2014  2015  2014 
Net income as reported $28,833  $24,585  $80,345  $69,522 
                 
Add/(deduct) after-tax cost of:                
Stock option expense  509   615   2,268   2,159 
Expenses of OIG investigation  711   279   2,369   997 
Long-term incentive compensation  863   634   2,375   1,258 
Litigation settlements  -   -   23   - 
Net expense/(recoveries) related to litigation settlements  -   (143)  3   64 
Expenses related to securities settlements  -   88   -   207 
Additional interest expense resulting from the change in accounting                
for the conversion feature of the convertible notes  -   -   -   2,143 
Acquisition expenses  18   -   98   1 
Adjusted net income $30,934  $26,058  $87,481  $76,351 
                 
Diluted Earnings Per Share As Reported                
Net income $1.65  $1.39  $4.61  $3.87 
Average number of shares outstanding  17,422   17,627   17,430   17,968 
                 
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share                
Adjusted net income $1.78  $1.48  $5.02  $4.28 
Adjusted average number of shares outstanding*  17,422   17,627   17,430   17,833 
                 
  
* Adjusted diluted average shares outstanding excludes the estimated dilutive impact of the Convertible Notes prior to conversion of these Notes on May 15, 2014 (121,000 shares for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 202,000 shares for the six months ended June 30, 2014) as this impact was entirely offset upon the exercise of the note hedges on May 15, 2014. 

Unaudited Consolidating Summary and Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA 
             
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies    
(in thousands)         Chemed 
For the three months ended June 30, 2015VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated 
             
Net income/(loss) $21,800  $12,153  $(6,978) $26,975 
Add/(deduct):                
Interest expense  53   98   818   969 
Income taxes  13,501   7,544   (3,853)  17,192 
Depreciation  4,724   3,205   153   8,082 
Amortization  171   128   283   582 
EBITDA  40,249   23,128   (9,577)  53,800 
Add/(deduct):                
Intercompany interest expense/(income)  (1,755)  (805)  2,560   - 
Interest income  (78)  (9)  1   (86)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  1,412   -   -   1,412 
Acquisition expenses  -   131   -   131 
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   37   37 
Advertising cost adjustment  -   (405)  -   (405)
Stock option expense  -   -   1,343   1,343 
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   1,457   1,457 
Adjusted EBITDA $39,828  $22,040  $(4,179) $57,689 
                 
             Chemed 
For the three months ended June 30, 2014VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated 
                 
Net income/(loss) $20,892  $10,719  $(7,248) $24,363 
Add/(deduct):                
Interest expense  57   111   2,261   2,429 
Income taxes  12,910   6,612   (4,039)  15,483 
Depreciation  4,564   2,561   147   7,272 
Amortization  205   137   393   735 
EBITDA  38,628   20,140   (8,486)  50,282 
Add/(deduct):                
Intercompany interest expense/(income)  (1,517)  (680)  2,197   - 
Interest income  (43)  (12)  (3)  (58)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  410   -   -   410 
Advertising cost adjustment  -   (399)  -   (399)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   32   -   32 
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   613   613 
Stock option expense  -   -   1,144   1,144 
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   189   189 
Adjusted EBITDA $37,478  $19,081  $(4,346) $52,213 
 
-28-

 
 
Unaudited Consolidating Summary and Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA 
             
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies    
(in thousands)         Chemed 
For the six months ended June 30, 2015VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated 
             
Net income/(loss) $41,116  $24,161  $(13,765) $51,512 
Add/(deduct):                
Interest expense  110   194   1,634   1,938 
Income taxes  25,617   15,011   (7,808)  32,820 
Depreciation  9,509   6,299   306   16,114 
Amortization  338   236   584   1,158 
EBITDA  76,690   45,901   (19,049)  103,542 
Add/(deduct):                
Intercompany interest expense/(income)  (3,482)  (1,642)  5,124   - 
Interest income  (110)  (20)  -   (130)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  2,686   -   -   2,686 
Acquisition expenses  -   131   -   131 
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   5   -   5 
Advertising cost adjustment  -   (911)  -   (911)
Stock option expense  -   -   2,787   2,787 
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   2,391   2,391 
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   37   37 
Adjusted EBITDA $75,784  $43,464  $(8,710) $110,538 
                 
             Chemed 
For the six months ended June 30, 2014VITAS Roto-Rooter Corporate Consolidated 
                 
Net income/(loss) $39,051  $20,751  $(14,865) $44,937 
Add/(deduct):                
Interest expense  112   208   5,924   6,244 
Income taxes  24,019   12,808   (8,265)  28,562 
Depreciation  9,178   4,961   282   14,421 
Amortization  624   282   838   1,744 
EBITDA  72,984   39,010   (16,086)  95,908 
Add/(deduct):                
Intercompany interest expense/(income)  (2,860)  (1,330)  4,190   - 
Interest income  20   (19)  (9)  (8)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  1,158   -   -   1,158 
Acquisition expenses  1   -   -   1 
Advertising cost adjustment  -   (1,140)  -   (1,140)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  113   225   -   338 
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   986   986 
Stock option expense  -   -   2,453   2,453 
Expenses related to securities litigation  -   -   189   189 
Adjusted EBITDA $71,416  $36,746  $(8,277) $99,885 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
OPERATING STATISTICS FOR VITAS SEGMENT 
(unaudited) 
  
  Three Months Ended September 30,  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
OPERATING STATISTICS 2015  2014  2015  2014 
Net revenue ($000)            
Homecare $222,952  $204,965  $640,867  $600,780 
Inpatient  24,271   25,012   76,485   77,037 
Continuous care  37,785   37,907   113,564   113,801 
Total before Medicare cap allowance $285,008  $267,884  $830,916  $791,618 
Medicare cap allowance  -   (2,500)  165   (1,796)
Total $285,008  $265,384  $831,081  $789,822 
Net revenue as a percent of total before Medicare cap allowances                
Homecare  78.2%  76.5%  77.1%  75.9%
Inpatient  8.5   9.3   9.2   9.7 
Continuous care  13.3   14.2   13.7   14.4 
Total before Medicare cap allowance  100.0   100.0   100.0   100.0 
Medicare cap allowance  -   (0.9)  -   (0.2)
Total  100.0%  99.1%  100.0%  99.8%
Average daily census (days)                
Homecare  11,607   10,662   11,259   10,562 
Nursing home  3,150   2,999   3,026   2,940 
Routine homecare  14,757   13,661   14,285   13,502 
Inpatient  404   417   424   429 
Continuous care  561   561   571   568 
Total  15,722   14,639   15,280   14,499 
Total Admissions  16,131   15,653   50,082   47,777 
Total Discharges  15,949   15,460   48,979   47,139 
Average length of stay (days)  78.6   83.7   78.9   82.4 
Median length of stay (days)  16.0   15.0   15.0   15.0 
ADC by major diagnosis                
Cerebro  28.8%  18.5%  28.6%  15.1%
Neurological  22.9   32.7   23.3   35.0 
Cancer  16.6   17.3   16.7   17.4 
Cardio  17.4   17.6   17.5   16.6 
Respiratory  7.9   8.0   7.9   7.9 
Other  6.4   5.9   6.0   8.0 
Total  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Admissions by major diagnosis                
Cerebro  18.7   13.5%  18.8%  9.3%
Neurological  12.5   18.2   12.3   20.6 
Cancer  33.3   34.0   32.1   33.3 
Cardio  14.5   15.2   15.3   14.8 
Respiratory  9.2   9.1   10.0   9.5 
Other  11.8   10.0   11.5   12.5 
Total  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Direct patient care margins                
Routine homecare  53.7%  53.8%  52.9%  53.4%
Inpatient  3.8   4.9   6.1   5.4 
Continuous care  15.7   17.4   16.1   17.2 
Homecare margin drivers (dollars per patient day)                
Labor costs $54.92  $53.65  $56.14  $54.31 
Drug costs  6.64   6.64   6.70   7.04 
Home medical equipment  6.66   6.68   6.55   6.69 
Medical supplies  2.81   3.22   2.93   3.20 
Inpatient margin drivers (dollars per patient day)                
Labor costs $355.30  $345.18  $347.52  $344.05 
Continuous care margin drivers (dollars per patient day)                
Labor costs $596.39  $584.99  $591.26  $586.60 
Bad debt expense as a percent of revenues  1.0%  1.0%  2.0%  1.0%
Accounts receivable -- Days of revenue outstanding- excluding unapplied Medicare payments  38.1   38.1  n.a  n.a 
Accounts receivable -- Days of revenue outstanding- including unapplied Medicare payments  32.3   36.3  n.a  n.a 
 
 
-29-

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME 
(in thousands, except per share data)(unaudited) 
             
  Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2015  2014  2015  2014 
Net income as reported $26,975  $24,363  $51,512  $44,937 
                 
Add/(deduct) after-tax cost of:                
Stock option expense  849   722   1,759   1,544 
Expenses of OIG investigation  868   254   1,658   718 
Long-term incentive compensation  921   388   1,512   624 
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   20   3   207 
Expenses related to securities settlements  23   119   23   119 
Additional interest expense resulting from the change in accounting                
for the conversion feature of the convertible notes  -   714   -   2,143 
Acquisition expenses  80   -   80   1 
Adjusted net income $29,716  $26,580  $56,547  $50,293 
                 
Diluted Earnings Per Share As Reported                
Net income $1.55  $1.36  $2.96  $2.48 
Average number of shares outstanding  17,419   17,880   17,419   18,097 
                 
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share                
Adjusted net income $1.71  $1.50  $3.25  $2.81 
Adjusted average number of shares outstanding*  17,419   17,759   17,419   17,895 
                 
  
* Adjusted diluted average shares outstanding excludes the estimated dilutive impact of the Convertible Notes prior to conversion of these Notes on May 15, 2014 (121,000 shares for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 202,000 shares for the six months ended June 30, 2014) as this impact was entirely offset upon the exercise of the note hedges on May 15, 2014. 
-30-

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
OPERATING STATISTICS FOR VITAS SEGMENT 
(unaudited) 
  Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30, 
OPERATING STATISTICS 2015  2014  2015  2014 
Net revenue ($000)            
Homecare $213,374  $200,418  $417,915  $395,815 
Inpatient  25,498   26,032   52,214   52,025 
Continuous care  37,588   37,719   75,779   75,894 
Total before Medicare cap allowance $276,460  $264,169  $545,908  $523,734 
Medicare cap allowance  -   (143)   165   704 
Total $276,460  $264,026  $546,073  $524,438 
Net revenue as a percent of total before Medicare cap allowances                
Homecare  77.2%  75.9%  76.5%  75.6%
Inpatient  9.2   9.8   9.6   9.9 
Continuous care  13.6   14.3   13.9   14.5 
Total before Medicare cap allowance  100.0   100.0   100.0   100.0 
Medicare cap allowance  -   (0.1)   -   0.1 
Total  100.0%  99.9%  100.0%  100.1%
Average daily census (days)                
Homecare  11,285   10,546   11,082   10,511 
Nursing home  3,006   2,989   2,964   2,909 
Routine homecare  14,291   13,535   14,046   13,420 
Inpatient  429   433   434   435 
Continuous care  563   568   575   572 
Total  15,283   14,536   15,055   14,427 
Total Admissions  16,683   15,771   33,951   32,124 
Total Discharges  15,912   15,673   33,019   31,678 
Average length of stay (days)  78.5   82.4   79.1   81.7 
Median length of stay (days)  15.0   16.0   14.0   15.0 
ADC by major diagnosis                
Cerebro  28.6%  6.3%  28.4%  6.4%
Neurological  23.0   41.2   23.4   40.9 
Cancer  16.8   17.3   16.9   17.4 
Cardio  17.4   15.7   17.5   15.4 
Respiratory  8.0   7.7   7.9   7.8 
Other  6.2   11.8   5.9   12.1 
Total  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Admissions by major diagnosis                
Cerebro  18.9   7.7%  18.8%  7.3%
Neurological  11.7   21.6   12.3   22.0 
Cancer  32.5   33.4   31.5   33.1 
Cardio  15.6   15.3   15.7   14.6 
Respiratory  10.0   9.6   10.4   9.8 
Other  11.3   12.4   11.3   13.2 
Total  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Direct patient care margins                
Routine homecare  52.4%  53.4%  52.6%  53.2%
Inpatient  6.0   6.9   7.2   5.6 
Continuous care  16.7   17.5   16.3   17.0 
Homecare margin drivers (dollars per patient day)                
Labor costs $56.38  $53.89  $56.79  $54.65 
Drug costs  6.94   7.26   6.73   7.25 
Home medical equipment  6.57   6.76   5.90   6.69 
Medical supplies  3.06   3.17   2.99   3.20 
Inpatient margin drivers (dollars per patient day)                
Labor costs $348.40  $337.30  $343.85  $343.50 
Continuous care margin drivers (dollars per patient day)                
Labor costs $589.84  $581.00  $588.72  $587.40 
Bad debt expense as a percent of revenues  1.0%  1.0%  1.0%  1.0%
Accounts receivable -- Days of revenue outstanding- excluding unapplied
Medicare payments
  40.8   36.6  n.a  n.a 
Accounts receivable -- Days of revenue outstanding- including unapplied
Medicare payments
  31.0   24.4  n.a  n.a 
-31-

 

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Certain statements contained in this report are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  The words “believe”, “expect”, “hope”, “anticipate”, “plan” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made.  These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and involve various known and unknown risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other factors, which could cause Chemed’s actual results to differ from those expressed in such forward-looking statements.  Variances in any or all of the risks, uncertainties, contingencies, and other factors from our assumptions could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements and trends.  In addition, our ability to deal with the unknown outcomes of these events, many of which are beyond our control, may affect the reliability of projections and other financial matters.  Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risk and there are no assurances that the matters contained in such statements will be achieved.  Chemed does not undertake and specifically disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of a new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
The Company’s primary market risk exposure relates to interest rate risk exposure through its variable interest line of credit.  At JuneSeptember 30, 2015, the Company had $160.0$138.1 million of variable rate debt outstanding.  For each $10 million dollars borrowed under the credit facility, an increase or decrease of 100 basis points (1% point), increases or decreases the Company’s annual interest expense by $100,000.

The Company continually evaluates this interest rate exposure and periodically weighs the cost versus the benefit of fixing the variable interest rates through a variety of hedging techniques.

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of our President and Chief Executive Officer and with the participation of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and the Vice President and Controller, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report.  Based on that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Vice President and Controller have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.  There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

For information regarding the Company’s legal proceedings, see note 10, Legal and Regulatory Matters, under Part I, Item I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 
-32--30-

 






Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Item 2(c). Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

The following table shows the activity related to our share repurchase program for the first sixnine months of 2015:


 Total Number  Weighted  Cumulative Shares  Dollar Amount  Total Number  Weighted Average  Cumulative Shares  Dollar Amount 
 of Shares  Price Paid Per  Repurchased Under  Remaining Under  of Shares  Price Paid Per  Repurchased Under  Remaining Under 
 Repurchased  Share  the Program  The Program  Repurchased  Share  the Program  The Program 
                        
February 2011 Program                        
January 1 through January 31, 2015  -  $-   6,074,819  $11,808,785   -  $-   6,074,819  $11,808,785 
February 1 through February 28, 2015  -   -   6,074,819   11,808,785   -   -   6,074,819   11,808,785 
March 1 through March 31, 2015  -   -   6,074,819  $111,808,785   -   -   6,074,819  $111,808,785 
                                
First Quarter Total  -  $-           -  $-         
                                
April 1 through April 30, 2015  31,239  $116.66   6,106,058  $108,163,534   31,239  $116.66   6,106,058  $108,163,534 
May 31 through May 31, 2015  218,761   119.38   6,324,819   82,047,193   218,761   119.38   6,324,819   82,047,193 
June 1 through June 30, 2015  -   -   6,324,819  $82,047,193   -   -   6,324,819  $82,047,193 
                                
Second Quarter Total  250,000  $119.05           250,000  $119.05         
                                
On March 13, 2015 our Board of Directors authorized an additional $100 million under the February 2011 Repurchase 
Program.                
July 1 through July 31, 2015  -  $-   6,324,819  $82,047,193 
August 1 through August 31, 2015  50,000   138.40   6,374,819   75,127,293 
September 1 through September 30, 2015  85,765   131.87   6,460,584  $63,817,207 
                
Third Quarter Total  135,765  $134.28         
                
On March 13, 2015 our Board of Directors authorized an additional $100 million under the February 2011 Repurchase Program.
On March 13, 2015 our Board of Directors authorized an additional $100 million under the February 2011 Repurchase Program.
 

ItemItem 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4.    Mine Safety Disclosures
None

None

Item 5.    Other Information

None

 
-33--31-

 

Item 6.    Exhibits

Exhibit No. Description
   
31.1 Certification by Kevin J. McNamara pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934.
   
31.2 Certification by David P. Williams pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange  Act of 1934.
   
31.3 Certification by Arthur V. Tucker, Jr. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934.
   
32.1 Certification by Kevin J. McNamara pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
32.2 Certification by David P. Williams pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
32.3 Certification by Arthur V. Tucker, Jr. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
101.INS XBRL Instance Document
   
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
   
101.CAL 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
 
101.DEF 
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
 
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
   
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
 
 
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
      Chemed Corporation
      (Registrant)
       
       
Dated: July 31,October  30, 2015 By: /s/ Kevin J. McNamara
      Kevin J. McNamara
      (President and Chief Executive Officer)
       
       
Dated: 
July 31,October 30, 2015
 By: /s/ David P. Williams
      David P. Williams
      (Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)
       
       
Dated: July 31,October 30, 2015 By: /s/ Arthur V. Tucker, Jr.
      Arthur V. Tucker, Jr.
      (Vice President and Controller)


-34-
-32-