UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


(Mark One)


x    Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2017


March 31, 2020

o    Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


Commission File Number: 1-8351


CHEMED CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware

31-0791746

Delaware

31-0791746

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)

255 E. Fifth Street, Suite 2600, Cincinnati, Ohio

45202

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip code)

(513) 762-6690

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)


(513) 762-6690
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes

No

Yes

x

No

o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes

No

Yes

x

No

o


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

Large Accelerated Filer

x

Accelerated Filer

o

Non-accelerated Filer

o

Emerging growth company

Smaller Reporting Company

o

Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended the extended transition period for complying with a new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13 (a) of the Exchange Act


o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes

No

Yes

o

No

x


Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Class

Amount

Date

Title of Each Class

Trading Symbol

Name of Each Exchange

on which Registered

Amount

Date

Capital Stock $1 Par Value

CHE

15,966,003

New York Stock Exchange

15,873,532 Shares

March 31, 2020

September 30, 2017




-1-

-1-




CHEMED CORPORATION AND

SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

Index




Index

Page No.

Page No.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION:

Item 1. Financial Statements

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets -

2019

3

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income -

2019

4

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -

2019

5

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity-

Three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019

6

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements

6

7

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

16

22

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

34

33

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

34

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

34

34

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

35

34

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

35

34

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

35

34

Item 5. Other Information

35

Item 6. Exhibits

36

EX – 101.INS

101

EX – 101.SCH104

EX – 101.CAL
EX – 101.DEF
EX – 101.LAB
EX – 101.PRE


-2-

-2-



PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share data)

March 31, 2020

December 31, 2019

ASSETS

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents

$

28,951

$

6,158

Accounts receivable less allowances of $1,427 (2019 - $353)

134,695

143,827

Inventories

7,313

7,462

Prepaid income taxes

5,917

10,074

Prepaid expenses

21,939

23,150

Total current assets

198,815

190,671

Investments of deferred compensation plans

72,296

77,446

Properties and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $278,768 (2019 - $270,140)

183,729

175,763

Lease right of use asset

112,302

111,652

Identifiable intangible assets less accumulated amortization of $40,094 (2019 - $37,620)

124,219

126,370

Goodwill

577,236

577,367

Other assets

8,962

9,048

Total Assets

$

1,277,559

$

1,268,317

LIABILITIES

Current liabilities

Accounts payable

$

37,838

$

51,101

Accrued insurance

56,480

50,328

Accrued compensation

63,622

70,814

Accrued legal

7,114

6,941

Short-term lease liability

36,252

39,280

Other current liabilities

45,431

43,756

Total current liabilities

246,737

262,220

Deferred income taxes

20,681

18,504

Long-term debt

160,000

90,000

Deferred compensation liabilities

70,363

76,446

Long-term lease liability

88,278

86,656

Other liabilities

7,899

7,883

Total Liabilities

593,958

541,709

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

 

 

STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

Capital stock - authorized 80,000,000 shares $1 par; issued 35,911,724 shares (2019 - 35,810,528 shares)

35,912

35,811

Paid-in capital

878,550

860,671

Retained earnings

1,476,151

1,425,752

Treasury stock - 20,116,345 shares (2019 - 19,867,220 shares)

(1,709,390)

(1,597,940)

Deferred compensation payable in Company stock

2,378

2,314

Total Stockholders' Equity

683,601

726,608

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

$

1,277,559

$

1,268,317

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
Item 1. Financial Statements 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
(in thousands, except share and per share data) 
       
       
       
  September 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
ASSETS      
Current assets      
Cash and cash equivalents $18,871  $15,310 
Accounts receivable less allowances of $14,997 (2016 - $14,236)  91,483   132,021 
Inventories  5,658   5,755 
Prepaid income taxes  3,621   3,709 
Prepaid expenses  15,678   13,105 
Total current assets  135,311   169,900 
Investments of deferred compensation plans  60,445   54,389 
Properties and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $227,036 (2016 - $211,290)  143,148   121,302 
Identifiable intangible assets less accumulated amortization of $32,862 (2016 - $33,225)  54,793   55,065 
Goodwill  473,024   472,366 
Deferred income taxes  21,893   8 
Other assets  6,845   7,029 
Total Assets $895,459  $880,059 
         
LIABILITIES        
Current liabilities        
Accounts payable $34,752  $39,586 
Current portion of long-term debt  10,000   8,750 
Income taxes  12,349   - 
Accrued insurance  44,584   47,960 
Accrued compensation  53,857   53,979 
Accrued legal  91,450   1,805 
Other current liabilities  22,382   19,752 
Total current liabilities  269,374   171,832 
Deferred income taxes  -   14,291 
Long-term debt  72,500   100,000 
Deferred compensation liabilities  59,389   54,288 
Other liabilities  16,494   15,549 
Total Liabilities  417,757   355,960 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)        
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Capital stock - authorized 80,000,000 shares $1 par; issued 34,513,535 shares (2016 - 34,270,104 shares)  34,514   34,270 
Paid-in capital  668,573   639,703 
Retained earnings  988,895   958,149 
Treasury stock - 18,632,867 shares (2016 - 18,083,527)  (1,216,509)  (1,110,536)
Deferred compensation payable in Company stock  2,229   2,513 
Total Stockholders' Equity  477,702   524,099 
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity $895,459  $880,059 
  
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. 


-3-

-3-



CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in thousands, except per share data)

Three Months Ended March 31,

2020

2019

Service revenues and sales

$

515,798

$

462,034 

Cost of services provided and goods sold (excluding depreciation)

351,745

321,951 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

70,583

74,029 

Depreciation

11,388

9,710 

Amortization

2,477

519 

Other operating expenses

242

6,353 

Total costs and expenses

436,435

412,562 

Income from operations

79,363

49,472 

Interest expense

(975)

(1,124)

Other (expense)/income - net

(9,466)

2,439 

Income before income taxes

68,922

50,787 

Income taxes

(13,031)

(6,120)

Net income

$

55,891

$

44,667 

Earnings Per Share:

Net income

$

3.50

$

2.80 

Average number of shares outstanding

15,991

15,954 

Diluted Earnings Per Share:

Net income

$

3.38

$

2.70 

Average number of shares outstanding

16,516

16,525 

Cash Dividends Per Share

$

0.32

$

0.30 

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
(in thousands, except per share data) 
             
             
             
  Three Months Ended September 30,  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Service revenues and sales $417,444  $392,607  $1,238,367  $1,173,405 
Cost of services provided and goods sold (excluding depreciation)  288,047   281,658   859,039   836,348 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  66,919   59,373   205,031   181,046 
Depreciation  8,819   8,614   26,545   25,619 
Amortization  33   91   111   274 
Other operating expenses/(income)  (371)  -   91,138   4,491 
Total costs and expenses  363,447   349,736   1,181,864   1,047,778 
Income from operations  53,997   42,871   56,503   125,627 
Interest expense  (1,048)  (1,018)  (3,164)  (2,831)
Other income - net  1,323   1,640   5,439   1,933 
Income before income taxes  54,272   43,493   58,778   124,729 
Income taxes  (18,835)  (16,664)  (15,153)  (48,175)
Net income $35,437  $26,829  $43,625  $76,554 
                 
Earnings Per Share                
Net income $2.22  $1.66  $2.72  $4.66 
Average number of shares outstanding  15,976   16,166   16,068   16,443 
                 
Diluted Earnings Per Share                
Net income $2.13  $1.62  $2.60  $4.54 
Average number of shares outstanding  16,676   16,559   16,763   16,851 
                 
Cash Dividends Per Share $0.28  $0.26  $0.80  $0.74 
                 
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. 


-4-

-4-



CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

Three Months Ended March 31,

2020

2019

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Net income

$

55,891

$

44,667 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided

by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

13,865 

10,229 

Stock option expense

5,045 

4,089 

Provision/(benefit) for deferred income taxes

2,290 

(3,489)

Noncash long-term incentive compensation

1,598 

1,119 

Provision for bad debts

594 

-

Amortization of debt issuance costs

76 

76 

Litigation settlement

-

6,000 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Decrease/(increase) in accounts receivable

6,269 

(81)

Decrease/(increase) in inventories

149 

(610)

Decrease in prepaid expenses

1,211 

(Decrease)/increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities

(7,037)

348 

Change in current income taxes

10,159

9,219 

Net change in lease assets and liabilities

(153)

(328)

Decrease/(increase) in other assets

5,048 

(5,006)

(Decrease)/increase in other liabilities

(6,067)

6,459 

Other sources

388 

887 

Net cash provided by operating activities

89,326 

73,585 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Capital expenditures

(19,897)

(13,866)

Business combinations

(1,452)

-

Other uses

(144)

(68)

Net cash used by investing activities

(21,493)

(13,934)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Proceeds from revolving line of credit

174,100 

125,100 

Payments on revolving line of credit

(104,100)

(114,300)

Purchases of treasury stock

(100,235)

(49,250)

Change in cash overdrafts payable

(9,849)

(13,303)

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

9,241 

11,827 

Capital stock surrendered to pay taxes on stock-based compensation

(7,951)

(11,170)

Dividends paid

(5,130)

(4,799)

Other (uses)/sources

(1,116)

181 

Net cash used by financing activities

(45,040)

(55,714)

Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

22,793 

3,937 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

6,158 

4,831 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$

28,951 

$

8,768 

See accompanying Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
(in thousands) 
    
  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities      
Net income $43,625  $76,554 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided        
by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  26,656   25,893 
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable  12,953   12,132 
Stock option expense  7,738   6,259 
Benefit for deferred income taxes  (36,175)  (5,530)
Potential litigation settlement  90,000   - 
Noncash early retirement expense  -   1,747 
Amortization of restricted stock awards  933   1,415 
Noncash directors' compensation  766   541 
Noncash long-term incentive compensation  2,888   837 
Amortization of debt issuance costs  387   390 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Decrease in accounts receivable  27,534   8,061 
Decrease in inventories  97   213 
Increase in prepaid expenses  (2,573)  (1,646)
Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable and other current liabilities  2,448   (5,471)
Increase in income taxes  12,432   8,587 
Increase in other assets  (6,238)  (5,694)
Increase in other liabilities  6,046   6,835 
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation  -   (2,974)
Other sources  1,472   204 
Net cash provided by operating activities  190,989   128,353 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities        
Capital expenditures  (50,247)  (29,708)
Business combinations  (525)  - 
Other sources/(uses)  116   (114)
Net cash used by investing activities  (50,656)  (29,822)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities        
Payments on revolving line of credit  (203,700)  (85,200)
Proceeds from revolving line of credit  183,700   110,200 
Purchases of treasury stock  (94,640)  (102,313)
Dividends paid  (12,879)  (12,215)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  11,625   4,625 
Change in cash overdrafts payable  (8,139)  2,092 
Capital stock surrendered to pay taxes on stock-based compensation  (7,637)  (7,051)
Payments on other long-term debt  (6,250)  (5,625)
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation  -   2,974 
Other sources  1,148   540 
Net cash used by financing activities  (136,772)  (91,973)
Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents  3,561   6,558 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  15,310   14,727 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $18,871  $21,285 
         
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements. 


-5-

-5-




CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY

(in thousands, except per share data)

Deferred

Compensation

Treasury

Payable in

Capital

Paid-in

Retained

Stock-

Company

Stock

Capital

Earnings

at Cost

Stock

Total

Balance at December 31, 2019

35,811 

860,671 

1,425,752 

(1,597,940)

2,314 

726,608 

Net income

-

-

55,891 

-

-

55,891 

Dividends paid ($0.32 per share)

-

-

(5,130)

-

-

(5,130)

Stock awards and exercise of stock options

101 

18,972 

-

(11,140)

-

7,933 

Purchases of treasury stock

-

-

-

(100,235)

-

(100,235)

Other

-

(1,093)

(362)

(75)

64 

(1,466)

Balance at March 31, 2020

$

35,912 

$

878,550 

$

1,476,151 

$

(1,709,390)

$

2,378 

$

683,601 

Deferred

Compensation

Treasury

Payable in

Capital

Paid-in

Retained

Stock-

Company

Stock

Capital

Earnings

at Cost

Stock

Total

Balance at December 31, 2018

35,311 

774,358 

1,225,617 

(1,446,296)

2,344 

591,334 

Net income

-

-

44,667 

-

-

44,667 

Dividends paid ($0.30 per share)

-

-

(4,799)

-

-

(4,799)

Stock awards and exercise of stock options

210 

29,152 

-

(23,495)

-

5,867 

Purchases of treasury stock

-

-

-

(49,250)

-

(49,250)

Other

-

191 

-

(36)

36 

191 

Balance at March 31, 2019

$

35,521 

$

803,701 

$

1,265,485 

$

(1,519,077)

$

2,380 

$

588,010 

The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of these statements.


-6-


CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements


1.    Basis of Presentation


As used herein, the terms "We," "Company"“We,” “Company” and "Chemed"“Chemed” refer to Chemed Corporation or Chemed Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.


We have prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Chemed in accordance with Rule 10-01 of SEC Regulation S-X. Consequently, we have omitted certain disclosures required under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The December 31, 20162019 balance sheet data were derived from audited financial statements but do not include all disclosures required by GAAP. However, in our opinion, the financial statements presented herein contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. These financial statements are prepared on the same basis as and should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019.

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial statements to conform to current presentation.

CURRENT EXPECTED CREDIT LOSSES

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments, Credit Losses. The ASU introduces the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) methodology. The CECL methodology utilizes a lifetime “expected credit loss” measurement objective for the recognition of credit losses for financial assets at the time the asset is originated or acquired. This generally results in earlier recognition of credit losses and greater transparency about credit risk. The Company adopted the provisions of ASU No. 2016-13 on January 1, 2020 using the modified retrospective method. The provisions of ASU No. 2016-13 did not significantly impact the method or timing that the Company recognizes expected credit losses and the cumulative effect of adoption was immaterial.

The Company’s only material financial asset subject to ASU No. 2016-13 is accounts receivable, trade and other. The Company recognizes an allowance for credit losses related to accounts receivable to present the net amount expected to be collected as of the balance sheet date. Accounts receivable are written-off when it is determined that the amount is deemed uncollectible. The following presents a detailed discussion of the operating subsidiaries’ accounts receivable and their evaluation of credit risk related to those accounts:

Roto-Rooter’s trade accounts receivable are comprised mainly of amounts due from commercial entities and commercial insurance carriers. Roto-Rooter’s accounts receivable are generally outstanding for 90 days or less and there are no significant amounts outstanding greater than one year. Roto-Rooter historically has not experienced significant write-offs due to credit losses. For amounts due from commercial entities, Roto-Rooter utilizes a provision matrix based on historical credit losses by aging category. For amounts due from commercial insurance carriers, mainly from water restoration revenue, Roto-Rooter periodically reviews published default tables related to commercial insurance carriers and provides an allowance. As further discussed below, Roto-Rooter assesses on a quarterly basis whether the historical rates used are expected to be representative of credit risk over the life of the account taking into consideration existing economic conditions.

In excess of 90% of VITAS’ accounts receivable are from the Federal or state governments under Medicare and Medicaid. VITAS believes that it is reasonable to expect that the risk of non-payment as a result of credit issues from these government entities is zero. As such, there is no allowance for credit losses established related to these accounts. The remainder of VITAS’ accounts are from commercial insurance carriers. VITAS’ accounts are generally outstanding for 90 days or less and there are no significant amounts outstanding greater than one year. VITAS historically has not experienced significant write-offs due to credit losses. VITAS periodically reviews published default tables related to commercial insurance carriers and provides an allowance. VITAS assesses on a quarterly basis whether these default rates are expected to be representative of credit risk over the life of the account taking into consideration existing economic conditions.

As further discussed in footnote 5, Chemed has $37.9 million in standby letters of credit outstanding. These letters of credit are with large, highly rated financial institutions. The Company periodically reviews published default tables related to these institutions to assess the need for an allowance. Chemed believes that any expected credit loss related to outstanding letters of credit based on current economic conditions is not material.

In conjunction with its first quarter of 2020 closing process, subsequent to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-13, Roto-Rooter re-assessed its expected credit losses as a result of COVID-19. In addition to the historical provision matrix described above, and in conjunction with the quarterly assessment of current economic conditions and published default rates to evaluate credit risk over the life of the account, Roto-Rooter analyzed the industries from which the accounts receivable originated. Using available information and judgement, additional expected credit losses were recorded for industries deemed higher risk during the economic shut down, such as


-7-


EARNINGS PER SHARE

restaurants, hotels and bars. The additional charge taken for the three-month period ended March 31, 2020 related to expected credit losses from COVID-19 issues was $524,000. The full economic impact as a result of COVID-19 and the related business shut-downs will not be known for some period of time. The amount recorded in the first quarter of 2020 represents management’s current best estimate.

ADDITIONS

(CHARGED)

CREDITED

(CHARGED)

BALANCE AT

TO COSTS

CREDITED

BALANCE

BEGINNING

AND

TO OTHER

AT END

DESCRIPTION

OF PERIOD

EXPENSES

ACCOUNTS

OTHER

OF PERIOD

March 31, 2020

$

(353)

$

(594)

$

(475)

$

(5)

$

(1,427)

CORONAVIRUS AID, RELIEF AND ECONOMIC STIMULUS (CARES) ACT

The recent COVID-19 pandemic did not have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flow and financial position as of and for the three months-ended March 31, 2020. We are closely monitoring the impact of the pandemic on all aspects of our business including impacts to employees, customers, patients, suppliers and vendors. The Company’s two operating subsidiaries have been categorized as critical infrastructure businesses and are not currently materially limited by federal, state or local regulations that restrict movement or operating ability.

The length and severity of the pandemic, coupled with related governmental actions including relief acts and actions relating to our workforce at federal, state and local levels, and underlying economic disruption will determine the ultimate short-term and long-term impact to our business operations and financial results. We are unable to predict the myriad of possible issues that could arise or the ultimate effect to our businesses as a result of the unknown short, medium and long-term impacts that the pandemic will have on the United States economy and society as a whole.

On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was passed. It is intended to provide economic relief to individuals and businesses affected by the coronavirus pandemic. It also contains provisions related to healthcare providers’ operations and the issues caused by the coronavirus pandemic. The following significant economic impacts for Chemed and its subsidiaries as a result of specific provisions of the CARES Act:

Chemed deferred its first quarter 2020 income tax payment of $8.8 million to the Federal government until July 15, 2020, as permitted by the CARES Act. In Marchaddition, Chemed and its subsidiaries deferred payment of certain employer payroll taxes and certain state tax payments, as permitted by the CARES Act.

A portion of the CARES Act provides $100 billion from the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund (“Relief Fund)” to hospitals and other healthcare providers on the front lines of the coronavirus response. Of this $100 billion distribution from the Relief Fund, $30 billion was designated to be automatically distributed to facilities and healthcare providers based upon their 2019 Medicare fee-for-service revenue. On April 10, 2020 VITAS automatically received $80.2 million from the Relief Fund based upon VITAS’s 2019 Medicare fee-for-service Medicare revenue. While specific details of the program have not been finalized, recipients of this $30 billion in CARES Act relief are specified to use these funds to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, and shall reimburse the recipient only for health care related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to coronavirus. The ability of VITAS to retain and utilize the full $80.2 million from the Relief Fund will depend on the magnitude, timing and nature of the economic impact of COVID-19 within VITAS, as well as the guidelines and rules of the Relief Fund program.

During the period from May 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, the 2% Medicare sequestration reimbursement cut is suspended. VITAS anticipates the impact to increase revenue approximately $15 million to $20 million, excluding the impact of the Medicare Cap.

LEASE ACCOUNTING

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2016-09 2016-02 Leases” which introduced a lessee model that brings most leases onto the balance sheets and updates lessor accounting to align with changes in the lessee model and the revenue recognition standard. This standard is also referred to as Accountings Standards Codification No.842 (“ASC 842”). We adopted ASC 842 effective January 1, 2019, using the optional transition method requiring leases existing at, or entered into after, January 1, 2019 to be recognized and measured. The transition method selected does not require adjustments to prior period amounts, which continue to be reflected in accordance with historical accounting. In addition, we elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard which among other things, allowed us to carry forward the historical lease classification.

-8-


Chemed and each of its operating subsidiaries are service companies. As such, real estate leases comprise the largest lease obligation (and conversely, right of use asset) in our lease portfolio. VITAS has leased office space, as well as space for inpatient units (“IPUs”) and/or contract beds within hospitals. Roto-Rooter mainly has leased office space.

Roto-Rooter purchases equipment and leases it to certain of its independent contractors. We analyzed these leases in accordance with ASC 842 and determined they are operating leases. As a result, Roto-Rooter will continue to capitalize the equipment underlying these leases, depreciate the equipment and recognize rental income.

Adoption of the new standard resulted in right of use assets and lease liabilities of $93.1 million and $104.3 million, respectively, as of January 1, 2019. In determining the liability, we used our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the time of adoption, since the rate implicit in the leases cannot be readily determined. At January 1, 2019, the weighted average rate was 3.47%. The standard did not materially impact our consolidated net income or cash flows. We did not book a cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of the standard.

CLOUD COMPUTING

On January 1, 2019, we early adopted ASU No. 2018-15, “Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract”. This ASU aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal use software. We adopted the ASU on a prospective basis.

As of March 31, 2020, we have 2 cloud computing arrangements that are service contracts. Roto-Rooter is implementing a system to assist in technician dispatch and VITAS implemented a new human resources system. We have capitalized approximately $6.0 million related to implementation of these projects which are included in prepaid assets in the accompanying balance sheets. The VITAS human resource system was placed into service in January 2020 and is being amortized over 5 years. Through March 31, 2020, $262,000 has been amortized. There has been 0 amortization expense associated with the Roto-Rooter project, as the software has not yet been placed in service. We anticipate amortizing this asset over the original term of the arrangement plus renewal options that are reasonably certain of being exercised.

NON-EMPLOYEE STOCK COMPENSATION

In June 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2018-07 – Compensation – Stock Compensation” which is part. The ASU expands the scope of the FASB’s Simplification Initiative.  The object of this initiative iscurrent guidance to identify, evaluate, and improve areas of GAAP. The areas of simplification in this initiative involve several aspects of the accounting forinclude all share-based payment transactions, includingarrangements related to the income tax consequences, classificationacquisition of awards as either equity or liabilities,goods and classification on the statement of cash flows.services from both non-employees and employees. The guidance wasin the ASU is effective for the Company in all fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016.  We adopted the applicable provisions of ASU 2016-09 on a prospective basis.  The impact2018. Adoption of this ASUstandard had no material impact on our financial statements forConsolidated Financial Statements.

INCOME TAXES

Our effective income tax rate was 18.9% in the first quarter ended September 30, 2017 wasof 2020 compared to decrease12.1% during the first quarter of 2019. Excess tax benefit on stock options reduced our income tax expenseexpenses by $4.6 million and $6.7 million, respectively for the quarters ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.

NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS

Included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets are $1.7 million and $1.8 million of capitalized property and equipment which were not paid for as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. These amounts have been excluded from capital expenditures in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow. There are no material non-cash amounts included in interest expense for any period presented.

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

We account for acquired businesses using the acquisition method of accounting. All assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recorded at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The determination of fair value involves estimates and the use of valuation techniques when market value is not readily available. We use various techniques to determine fair value in accordance with accepted valuation models, primarily the income approach. The significant assumptions used in developing fair values include, but are not limited to, revenue growth rates, the amount and timing of future cash flows, discount rates, useful lives, royalty rates and future tax rates. The excess of purchase price over the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired is recorded as goodwill. See footnote 17 for discussion of recent acquisitions.

-9-


2.    Revenue Recognition

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The standard and subsequent amendments are theoretically intended to develop a common revenue standard for removing inconsistencies and weaknesses, improve comparability, provide for more useful information to users through improved disclosure requirements and simplify the preparation of financial statements. The standard is also referred to as Accounting Standards Codification No. 606 (“ASC 606”). We adopted ASC 606 effective January 1, 2018. The required disclosures of ASC 606 and impact of adoption are discussed below for each of our operating subsidiaries.

VITAS

Service revenue for VITAS is reported at the amount that reflects the ultimate consideration we expect to receive in exchange for providing patient care. These amounts are due from third-party payors, primarily commercial health insurers and government programs (Medicare and Medicaid), and include variable consideration for revenue adjustments due to settlements of audits and reviews, as well as certain hospice-specific revenue capitations. Amounts are generally billed monthly or subsequent to patient discharge. Subsequent changes in the transaction price initially recognized are not significant.

Hospice services are provided on a daily basis and the type of service provided is determined based on a physician’s determination of each patient’s specific needs on that given day. Reimbursement rates for hospice services are on a per diem basis regardless of the type of service provided or the payor. Reimbursement rates from government programs are established by the appropriate governmental agency and are standard across all hospice providers. Reimbursement rates from health insurers are negotiated with each payor and generally structured to closely mirror the Medicare reimbursement model. The types of hospice services provided and associated reimbursement model for each are as follows:

Routine Home Care occurs when a patient receives hospice care in their home, including a nursing home setting.  The routine home care rate is paid for each day that a patient is in a hospice program and is not receiving one of the other categories of hospice care.  For Medicare patients, the routine home care rate reflects a two-tiered rate, with a higher rate for the first 60 days of a hospice patient’s care and a lower rate for days 61 and after.  In addition, there is a Service Intensity Add-on payment which covers direct home care visits conducted by a registered nurse or social worker in the last seven days of a hospice patient’s life, reimbursed up to 4 hours per day in 15 minute increments at the continuous home care rate.

General Inpatient Care occurs when a patient requires services in a controlled setting for a short period of time for pain control or symptom management which cannot be managed in other settings.  General inpatient care services must be provided in a Medicare or Medicaid certified hospital or long-term care facility or at a freestanding inpatient hospice facility with the required registered nurse staffing.

Continuous Home Care is provided to patients while at home, including a nursing home setting, during periods of crisis when intensive monitoring and care, primarily nursing care, is required in order to achieve palliation or management of acute medical symptoms.  Continuous home care requires a minimum of 8 hours of care within a 24-hour day, which begins at midnight.  The care must be predominantly nursing care provided by either a registered nurse or licensed nurse practitioner.  While the published Medicare continuous home care rates are daily rates, Medicare pays for continuous home care in 15 minute increments.  This 15 minute rate is calculated by dividing the daily rate by 96.

Respite Care permits a hospice patient to receive services on an inpatient basis for a short period of time in order to provide relief for the patient’s family or other caregivers from the demands of caring for the patient.  A hospice can receive payment for respite care for a given patient for up to five consecutive days at a time, after which respite care is reimbursed at the routine home care rate.

Each level of care represents a separate promise under the contract of care and is provided independently for each patient contingent upon the patient’s specific medical needs as determined by a physician. However, the clinical criteria used to determine a patient’s level of care is consistent across all patients, given that, each patient is subject to the same payor rules and regulations. As a result, we have concluded that each level of care is capable of being distinct and is distinct in the context of the contract. Furthermore, we have determined that each level of care represents a stand ready service provided as a series of either days or hours of patient care. We believe that the performance obligations for each level of care meet criteria to be satisfied over time. VITAS recognizes revenue based on the service output. VITAS believes this to be the most faithful depiction of the transfer of control of services as the patient simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided by our performance. Revenue is recognized on a daily or hourly basis for each patient in accordance with the reimbursement model for each type of service. VITAS’ performance obligations relate to contracts with an expected duration of less than one year. Therefore, VITAS has elected to apply the optional exception provided in ASC 606 and is not required to disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or

-10-


partially unsatisfied at the end of the reporting period. The unsatisfied or partially satisfied performance obligations referred to above relate to bereavement services provided to patients’ families for at least 12 months after discharge.

Care is provided to patients regardless of their ability to pay. Patients who meet our criteria for charity care are provided care without charge. There is no revenue or associated accounts receivable in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements related to charity care. The cost of providing charity care during the quarters ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 was $2.2 million and $2.1 million, respectively. The cost of charity care is included in cost of services provided and goods sold and is calculated by taking the ratio of charity care days to total days of care and multiplying by the total cost of care.

Generally, patients who are covered by third-party payors are responsible for related deductibles and coinsurance which vary in amount. VITAS also provides service to patients without a reimbursement source and may offer those patients discounts from standard charges. VITAS estimates the transaction price for patients with deductibles and coinsurance, along with those uninsured patients, based on historical experience and current conditions. The estimate of any contractual adjustments, discounts or implicit price concessions reduces the amount of revenue initially recognized. Subsequent changes to the estimate of the transaction price are recorded as adjustments to patient service revenue in the period of change. Subsequent changes that are determined to be the result of an adverse change in the patients’ ability to pay (i.e. change in credit risk) are recorded as bad debt expense. VITAS has no material adjustments related to subsequent changes in the estimate of the transaction price or subsequent changes as the result of excess tax benefits on stockan adverse change in the patient’s ability to pay for any period reported.

Laws and regulations concerning government programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, are complex and subject to varying interpretation. Medicare and Medicaid programs have broad authority to audit and review compliance with such laws and regulations, and impose payment suspensions when merited. Additionally, the contracts we have with commercial health insurance payors provide for retroactive audit and review of claims. Settlement with third party payors for retroactive adjustments due to audits, reviews or investigations are considered variable consideration and are included in the determination of the estimated transaction price for providing patient care. The variable consideration is estimated based compensation being recorded on the statementsterms of income. This, combined with the required change in diluted share count, resulted in an increase to basic and diluted earnings per share of $0.11 and $0.09, respectively. The impact of this ASU on our financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was to decrease our income tax expense by $8.1 million as the result of excess tax benefits on stock based compensation being recorded on the statements of income. This, combined with the required change in diluted share count, resulted in an increase to basic earnings per share by $0.51 and an increase to diluted earnings per share by $0.46.


INCOME TAXES
The effective tax rate for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2017 was 34.7% and 25.8%, respectively.  These rates differpayment agreement, existing correspondence from the US statutory tax rates primarilypayor and our historical settlement activity. These estimates are adjusted in future periods, as the result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 described above. 

2.   Revenue Recognition

Both the VITAS segment and the Roto-Rooter segment recognize service revenues and sales when the earnings process has been completed.  Generally, this occurs when services are provided or products are shipped.  VITAS recognizes revenue at the estimated realizable amount due from third-party payers.  Medicare paymentsnew information becomes available.

We are subject to certain limitations on Medicare payments for services which are considered variable consideration, as described below.


follows:

Inpatient Cap. If the number of inpatient care days any hospice program provides to Medicare beneficiaries exceeds 20% of the total days of hospice care such program provided to all Medicare patients for an annual period beginning September 28, the days in excess of the 20% figure may be reimbursed only at the routine homecare rate. None of VITAS’ hospice programs exceeded the payment limits on inpatient services during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.

Medicare Cap. We are also subject to a Medicare annual per-beneficiary cap (“Medicare cap”). Compliance with the Medicare cap is measured in one of two ways based on a provider election. The “streamlined” method compares total Medicare payments received under a Medicare provider number with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by that Medicare provider number with the product of the per-beneficiary cap amount and the number of Medicare beneficiaries electing hospice care for the first time from that hospice program or programs from September 28 through September 27 of the following year. At March 31, 2020, all our programs except one are using the “streamlined” method.

The “proportional” method compares the total Medicare payments received under a Medicare provider number with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by the Medicare provider number between September 28 and September 27 of the following year with the product of the per beneficiary cap amount and a pro-rated number of Medicare beneficiaries receiving hospice services from that program during the same period. The pro-rated number of Medicare beneficiaries is calculated based on the ratio of days the beneficiary received hospice services during the measurement period to the total number of days the beneficiary received hospice services.

We actively monitor each of our hospice programs, by provider number, as to their specific admission, discharge rate and median length of stay data in an attempt to determine whether theyrevenues are likely to exceed the annual per-beneficiary Medicare cap (“Medicare cap”).cap. Should we determine that revenues for a program are likely to exceed the Medicare cap based on projected trends, we attempt to institute corrective actionactions, which include changes to influence the patient mix or to increaseand increased patient admissions. However, should we project our corrective action will not prevent that program from exceeding its Medicare cap, we estimate the amount of revenue recognized during the periodgovernment fiscal year that will require repayment to the Federal government under the Medicare cap and record an adjustment to revenue of an amount equal to a ratable portion of our best estimate for the amount as a reduction to patient revenue.


year.

In 2013, the U.S. government implemented automatic budget reductions of 2.0% for all government payees, including hospice benefits paid under the Medicare program. In 2015, CMS determined that the Medicare cap should be calculated “as if” sequestration

-11-


did not occur. As a result of this decision, VITAS has received notification from our third party third-party intermediary that an additional $2.3$8.3 million is owed for Medicare cap in three programs arising during the 2013 2014 and 2015through 2019 measurement periods. The amounts wereare automatically deducted from our semi-monthly PIP payments. We do not believe that CMS is authorized under the sequestration authority or the statutory methodology for establishing the Medicare cap to demand the $2.3 millionamounts they have withheld and intend to withhold under their current “as if” methodology. We have not recorded a reserve as of September 30, 2017 for $480,000 of the potential exposure.  We have appealed CMS’s methodology change withchange. Pursuant to the appropriate regulatory appeal board.

-6-

recent legislation, the sequestration has been lifted for the period from May 1 through December 31, 2020.

During the three and nine monthsquarter ended September 30, 2016, respectively, $228,000March 31, 2020, we recorded $2.5 million in net Medicare cap wasrevenue reduction related to five programs for the 2020 government fiscal year.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2019, we recorded for one program’s projected 2015 measurement period liability


There was no$3.4 million in net Medicare cap recordedrevenue reduction related to three programs for the 2019 government fiscal year.

For VITAS’ patients in the nursing home setting in which Medicaid pays the nursing home room and board, VITAS serves as a pass-through between Medicaid and the nursing home. We are responsible for paying the nursing home for that patient’s room and board. Medicaid reimburses us for 95% of the amount we have paid. This results in a 5% net expense for VITAS related to nursing home room and board. This transaction creates a performance obligation in that VITAS is facilitating room and board being delivered to our patient. As a result, the 5% net expense is recognized as a contra-revenue account under ASC 606 in the accompanying financial statements.

The composition of patient care service revenue by payor and level of care for the quarter ended September 30, 2017.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we recorded $247,000 for two programs cap liability for the 2013, 2014 and 2015 measurement periods of the amount recorded, $105,000 relates to the sequestration issue described above.


Shown below is the Medicare cap liability activity for the fiscal periods ended (in thousands):

  September 30, 
  2017  2016 
Beginning balance January 1, $235  $1,165 
Prior measurement periods  247   228 
Payments  (482)  (1,158)
Ending balance September 30, $-  $235 

Vitas provides charity care, in certain circumstances, to patients without charge when management of the hospice program determines, at the time services are performed, that the patient cannot afford payment.  There is no revenue or associated accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated financial statements related to charity care.  The cost of charity care is calculated by taking the ratio of charity care days to total days of care and multiplying by total cost of care.  The cost of charity careMarch 31, 2020 is as follows (in thousands):

Medicare

Medicaid

Commercial

Total

Routine home care

$

253,965

$

12,133

5,664

$

271,762

Continuous care

37,132

1,871

1,552

40,555

Inpatient care

28,148

2,559

1,775

32,482

$

319,245

$

16,563

$

8,991

$

344,799

All other revenue - self-pay, respite care, etc.

3,147

Subtotal

$

347,946

Medicare cap adjustment

(2,500)

Implicit price concessions

(4,149)

Room and board, net

(3,381)

Net revenue

$

337,916

The composition of patient care service revenue by payor and level of care for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 is as follows (in thousands):

Medicare

Medicaid

Commercial

Total

Routine home care

$

241,700

$

11,673

$

5,474

$

258,847

Continuous care

28,973

1,787

1,484

32,244

Inpatient care

18,989

2,148

1,433

22,570

$

289,662

$

15,608

$

8,391

$

313,661

All other revenue - self-pay, respite care, etc.

2,010

Subtotal

$

315,671

Medicare cap adjustment

(3,400)

Implicit price concessions

(2,948)

Room and board, net

(2,542)

Net revenue

$

306,781

Roto-Rooter

Roto-Rooter provides plumbing, drain cleaning, water restoration and other related services to both residential and commercial customers primarily in the United States. Services are provided through a network of company-owned branches, independent contractors and franchisees. Service revenue for Roto-Rooter is reported at the amount that reflects the ultimate consideration we expect to receive in exchange for providing services.

Roto-Rooter owns and operates branches focusing mainly on large population centers in the United States. Roto-Rooter’s primary lines of business in company-owned branches consist of plumbing, sewer and drain cleaning, excavation and water restoration. For purposes of ASC 606 analysis, plumbing, sewer and drain cleaning, and excavation have been combined into one portfolio and are

-12-

Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
2017  2016  2017  2016 
 $1,906   $1,711   $5,603   $5,231 



referred to as “short-term core services”. Water restoration is analyzed as a separate portfolio. The following describes the key characteristics of these portfolios:

Short-term Core Services are plumbing, drain and sewer cleaning and excavation services. These services are provided to both commercial and residential customers. The duration of services provided in this category range from a few hours to a few days. There are no significant warranty costs or on-going obligations to the customer once a service has been completed. For residential customers, payment is received at the time of job completion before the Roto-Rooter technician leaves the residence. Commercial customers may be granted credit subject to internally designated authority limits and credit check guidelines. If credit is granted, payment terms are generally 30 days or less.

Each job in this category is a distinct service with a distinct performance obligation to the customer. Revenue is recognized at the completion of each job. Variable consideration consists of pre-invoice discounts and post-invoice discounts. Pre-invoice discounts are given in the form of coupons or price concessions. Post-invoice discounts consist of credit memos generally granted to resolve customer service issues. Variable consideration is estimated based on historical activity and recorded at the time service is completed.

Water Restoration Services involve the remediation of water and humidity after a flood. These services are provided to both commercial and residential customers. The duration of services provided in this category generally ranges from 3 to 5 days. There are no significant warranties or on-going obligations to the customer once service has been completed. The majority of these services are paid by the customer’s insurance company. Variable consideration relates primarily to allowances taken by insurance companies upon payment. Variable consideration is estimated based on historical activity and recorded at the time service is completed.

For both short-term core services and water restoration services, Roto-Rooter satisfies its performance obligation at a point in time. The services provided generally involve fixing plumbing, drainage or flood-related issues at the customer’s property. At the time service is complete, the customer acknowledges its obligation to pay for service and its satisfaction with the service performed. This provides evidence that the customer has accepted the service and Roto-Rooter is now entitled to payment. As such, Roto-Rooter recognizes revenue for these services upon completion of the job and receipt of customer acknowledgement. Roto-Rooter’s performance obligations for short-term core services and water restoration services relate to contracts with an expected duration of less than a year. Therefore, Roto-Rooter has elected to apply the optional exception provided in ASC 606 and is not required to disclose the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied at the end of the reporting period. Roto-Rooter does not have significant unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied performance obligations at the time of initial revenue recognition for short-term core or water restoration services.

Roto-Rooter owns the rights to certain territories and contracts with independent third-parties to operate the territory under Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks. Such contracts are for a specified term but cancellable by either party without penalty with 90 days’ advance notice. Under the terms of these arrangements, Roto-Rooter provides certain back office support and advertising along with a limited license to use Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks. The independent contractor is responsible for all day-to-day management of the business including staffing decisions and pricing of services provided. All performance obligations of Roto-Rooter cease at the termination of the arrangement.

Independent contractors pay Roto-Rooter a standard fee calculated as a percentage of their cash collection from weekly sales. The primary value for the independent contractors under these arrangements is the right to use Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks. Roto-Rooter recognizes revenue from independent contractors over-time (weekly) as the independent contractor’s labor sales are completed and payment from customers are received. Payment from independent contractors is also received on a weekly basis. The use of Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks and advertising provides immediate value to the independent contractor as a result of Roto-Rooter’s nationally recognized brand. Therefore, over-time recognition provides the most faithful depiction of the transfer of services as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided. There is no significant variable consideration related to these arrangements.

Roto-Rooter has licensed the rights to operate under Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks in other territories to franchisees. Each such contract is for a 10 year term but cancellable by Roto-Rooter for cause with 60 day advance notice without penalty. The franchisee may cancel the contract for any reason with 60 days advance notice without penalty. Under the terms of the contract, Roto-Rooter provides national advertising and consultation on various aspects of operating a Roto-Rooter business along with the right to use Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks. The franchisee is responsible for all day- to-day management of the business including staffing decisions, pricing of services provided and local advertising spend and placement. All performance obligations of Roto-Rooter cease at the termination of the arrangement.

Franchisees pay Roto-Rooter a standard monthly fee based on the population within the franchise territory. The standard fee is revised on a yearly basis based on changes in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers. The primary value for the franchisees under this arrangement is the right to use Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks. Roto-Rooter recognizes revenue from franchisees over-time (monthly). Payment from franchisees is also received on a monthly basis. The use of Roto-Rooter’s registered trademarks and advertising provides immediate value to the franchisees as a result of Roto-Rooter’s nationally recognized brand.

-13-


Therefore, over-time recognition provides the most faithful depiction of the transfer of services as the customer simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided. There is no significant variable consideration related to these arrangements.

The composition of disaggregated revenue for the first quarter is as follows (in thousands):

March 31,

2020

2019

Short-term core service jobs

$

134,424

$

112,185

Water restoration

29,246

29,208

Contractor revenue

16,228

14,032

Franchise fees

1,190

1,621

All other

3,534

3,008

Subtotal

$

184,622

$

160,054

Implicit price concessions and credit memos

(6,740)

(4,801)

Net revenue

$

177,882

$

155,253

3.    Segments


Service revenues and sales and after-taxby business segment are shown in Footnote 2. After-tax earnings by business segment are as follows (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31,

2020

2019

After-tax Income/(Loss)

VITAS

$

41,279

$

29,288 

Roto-Rooter

24,322

22,986 

Total

65,601

52,274 

Corporate

(9,710)

(7,607)

Net income

$

55,891

$

44,667 


  Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Service Revenues and Sales
            
VITAS $288,951  $282,865  $855,977  $839,131 
Roto-Rooter  128,493   109,742   382,390   334,274 
Total $417,444  $392,607  $1,238,367  $1,173,405 
                 
After-tax Income/(Loss)
                
VITAS $26,454  $20,903  $14,797  $58,538 
Roto-Rooter  16,034   12,855   47,716   39,216 
Total  42,488   33,758   62,513   97,754 
Corporate  (7,051)  (6,929)  (18,888)  (21,200)
Net income $35,437  $26,829  $43,625  $76,554 

We report corporate administrative expenses and unallocated investing and financing income and expense not directly related to either segment as “Corporate”.

-7-

4.    Earnings per Share


Earnings per share (“EPS”) are computed using the weighted average number of shares of capital stock outstanding. Earnings and diluted earnings per share are computed as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

Net Income

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

Income

Shares

Earnings per Share

2020

Earnings

$

55,891

15,991

$

3.50

Dilutive stock options

-

446

Nonvested stock awards

-

79

Diluted earnings

$

55,891

16,516

$

3.38

2019

Earnings

$

44,667

15,954

$

2.80

Dilutive stock options

-

494

Nonvested stock awards

-

77

Diluted earnings

$

44,667

16,525

$

2.70

  Net Income 
For the Three Months Ended September 30, Income  Shares  Earnings per Share 
2017         
Earnings $35,437   15,976  $2.22 
Dilutive stock options  -   616     
Nonvested stock awards  -   84     
Diluted earnings $35,437   16,676  $2.13 
             
2016            
Earnings $26,829   16,166  $1.66 
Dilutive stock options  -   294     
Nonvested stock awards  -   99     
Diluted earnings $26,829   16,559  $1.62 


  Net Income 
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, Income  Shares  Earnings per Share 
2017         
Earnings $43,625   16,068  $2.72 
Dilutive stock options  -   609     
Nonvested stock awards  -   86     
Diluted earnings $43,625   16,763  $2.60 
             
2016            
Earnings $76,554   16,443  $4.66 
Dilutive stock options  -   296     
Nonvested stock awards  -   112     
Diluted earnings $76,554   16,851  $4.54 

For the three months ended September 30, 2017, noMarch 31, 2020, there were 285,000 stock options and nonvested stock awards have been excluded in the calculationcomputation of dilutive earnings per share because they would have been anti-dilutive.


For the nine month periodthree months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, there were 7,304246,000 stock options excluded fromin the computation of diluteddilutive earnings per share because they would have been anti-dilutive.


-14-


 For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016, 418,000 stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because they would have been anti-dilutive.

5.    Long-Term Debt


and Lines of Credit

On June 30, 2014,20, 2018, we replaced our existing credit agreement with the ThirdFourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“20142018 Credit Agreement”). Terms of the 20142018 Credit Agreement consist of a five-year, $350five year, $450 million revolving credit facility and a $100$150 million expansion feature, which may consist of term loan.loans or additional revolving commitments.  The 2014interest rate at the inception of the agreement is LIBOR plus 100 basis points. The 2018 Credit Agreement has a floating interest rate that is generally LIBOR plus a tiered additional rate which varies based on our current leverage ratio. The interest rate as of September 30, 2017 is LIBOR plus 113 basis points.


-8-

The debtamount outstanding as of September 30, 2017 consists ofMarch 31, 2020 is $160.0 million.

Debt issuance costs associated with the following:


Revolver $5,000 
Term loan  77,500 
Total  82,500 
Current portion of long-term debt  (10,000)
Long-term debt $72,500 

Scheduled principal payments ofprior credit agreement were not written off as the term loan are as follows:
2017 $2,500 
2018  10,000 
2019  65,000 
  $77,500 

lenders and their relative percentages participation in the facility did not change. With respect to the 2018 Credit Agreement, deferred financing costs were $1.0 million.

The 20142018 Credit Agreement contains the following quarterly financial covenants:

covenants effective as of March 31, 2020:


Description

Requirement

Description

Requirement

Leverage Ratio (Consolidated Indebtedness/Consolidated Adj. EBITDA)

< 3.50 to 1.00

Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (Consolidated Free Cash Flow/Consolidated Fixed Charges)

> 1.50 to 1.00

Annual Operating Lease Commitment< $50.0 million


We are in compliance with all debt covenants as of September 30, 2017.March 31, 2020. We have issued $35.6$37.9 million in standby letters of credit as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2020, mainly for insurance purposes. Issued letters of credit reduce our available credit under the 20142018 Credit Agreement. As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2020, we have approximately $309.4$252.1 million of unused lines of credit available and eligible to be drawn down under our revolving credit facility.


6.    Other Operating Income/(Expenses)Expenses/(Income)

Three months ended March 31,

2020

2019

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

$

242 

$

353 

Litigation settlement

-

6,000 

Total other operating expenses

$

242 

$

6,353 

  Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
             
Potential litigation settlement $-  $-  $90,000  $- 
Program closure (income)/expenses  (371)  -   1,138   - 
Retirement expenses  -   -   -   4,491 
Total other operating (income)/expenses $(371) $-  $91,138  $4,491 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, the Company recorded a credit for recovery of previously expensed costs of $371,000 and a net expense of $1.1 million, respectively, related to the closure of three Alabama programs at VITAS.


During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded $90$6.0 million for a potential legal settlement, which includes the settlement amount, estimated employment taxes and other litigation settlement.costs. See footnote 11 for further discussion.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded early retirement related costs and accelerated stock-based compensation expense of approximately $4.5 million pretax and $2.8 million after-tax, related to the early retirement of VITAS’ former Chief Executive Officer.
-9-

7.    Other (Expense)/Income – Net


Other (expense)/income -- net comprises the following (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31,

2020

2019

Market value adjustment on assets held in

deferred compensation trust

$

(9,572)

$

2,338 

Interest income

106 

101 

Total other (expense)/income - net

$

(9,466)

$

2,439 

8.    Leases

Chemed and each of its operating subsidiaries are service companies. As such, real estate leases comprise the largest lease obligation (and conversely, right of use asset) in our lease portfolio. VITAS has leased office space, as well as space for IPUs and/or contract beds within hospitals. Roto-Rooter has leased office space. Our leases have remaining terms of under 1 year to 10 years, some of which include options to extend the lease for up to 5 years, and some of which include options to terminate the lease within 1 year.

We do not currently have any finance leases, therefore all lease information disclosed is related to operating leases.

-15-

  Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Market value adjustment on assets held in            
deferred compensation trust $1,417  1,656  5,619  1,857 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment  (146)  (134)  (481)  (224)
Interest income  51   119   297   301 
Other - net  1   (1)  4   (1)
Total other income - net 1,323  1,640  5,439  1,933 



The components of balance sheet information related to leases were as follows:


March 31,


December 31,

2020

2019

Assets

Operating lease assets

$

112,302 

$

111,652 

Liabilities

Current operating leases

36,252 

39,280 

Noncurrent operating leases

88,278 

86,656 

Total operating lease liabilities

$

124,530 

$

125,936 

The components of lease expense were as follows:

Three months ended
March 31,

2020

2019

Lease Expense (a)

Operating lease expense

$

14,610 

$

11,537 

Sublease income

-

(6)

Net lease expense

$

14,610 

$

11,531 

(a)Includes short-term leases and variable lease costs, which are immaterial. Included in both cost of services provided and goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses.

The components of cash flow information related to leases were as follows:

Three months ended
March 31,

2020

2019

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities

Operating cash flows from leases

$

12,028 

$

9,987 

Leased assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities

$

12,583 

$

3,213 

Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term at March 31, 2020

Operating leases

4.5

years

Weighted Average Discount Rate at March 31, 2020

Operating leases

3.24

%

Maturity of Operating Lease Liabilities (in thousands)

2020

$

32,855

2021

32,430

2022

24,360

2023

18,089

2024

12,948

Thereafter

13,387

Total lease payments

$

134,069

Less: interest

(9,423)

Less: future lease obligations not yet commenced

(116)

Total liability recognized on the balance sheet

$

124,530

For leases commencing prior to April 2019, minimum rental payments exclude payments to landlords for real estate taxes and common area maintenance. Operating lease payments include $2.3 million related to extended lease terms that are reasonably certain of being exercised and exclude $116,000 lease payments for leases signed but not yet commenced.

 8.

-16-


9.    Stock-Based Compensation Plans


On February 17, 2017,21, 2020, the Compensation/Incentive Committee of the Board of Directors (“CIC”) granted 7,3045,156 Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”) contingent upon the achievement of certain total shareholdersshareholder return (“TSR”) targets as compared to the TSR of a group of peer companies for the three-yearthree year period ending December 31, 2019,2022, the date at which such awards vest. The cumulative compensation cost of the TSR-based PSU award to be recorded over the three year service period is $1.7$3.3 million.


On February 17, 2017,21, 2020, the CIC also granted 7,3045,156 PSUs contingent upon the achievement of certain earnings per share (“EPS”) targets for the three-yearthree year period ending December 31, 2019.2022. At the end of each reporting period, the Company estimates the number of shares that it believes will ultimately be earned and records thatthe corresponding expense over the service period of the award. We currently estimate the cumulative compensation cost of the EPS-based PSUs to be recorded over the three year service period is $1.3$5.0 million.


9.   Independent Contractor Operations

The Roto-Rooter segment sublicenses with 69 independent contractors to operate certain plumbing repair, excavation, water restoration and drain cleaning businesses in lesser-populated areas of the United States and Canada.  We had notes receivable from our independent contractors as of September 30, 2017 totaling $1.5 million (December 31, 2016 - $1.7 million).  In most cases these loans are fully or partially secured by equipment owned by the contractor.  The interest rates on the loans range from 0% to 7% per annum and the remaining terms of the loans range from less than 3 months to approximately 5 years at September 30, 2017.  We recorded the following from our independent contractors (in thousands):
  Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Revenues 10,455  9,823  32,632  29,451 
Pretax income  6,311   5,835   19,742   18,015 


10.    Retirement Plans


All of the Company’s plans that provide retirement and similar benefits are defined contribution plans. These expenses include the impact of market gains and losses on assets held in deferred compensation plans and are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses. ExpensesNet (losses)/gains for the Company’s retirement and profit-sharing plans, excess benefit plans and other similar plans are as follows (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31,

2020

2019

$

(4,414)

$

6,914


Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended Nine 30, 
2017  2016  2017  2016 
 $4,427   $4,423   $15,136   $10,809 
-10-

11.    Legal and Regulatory Matters


The VITAS segment of the Company’s business operates in a heavily-regulated industry. As a result, the Company is subjected to inquiries and investigations by various government agencies, which can result in penalties including repayment obligations, funding withholding, or debarment, as well as to lawsuits, including qui tam actions. The following sections describe the various ongoing material lawsuits and investigations of which the Company is currently aware. Other than as described below, with respect to U.S. v. Vitas, it is not possible at this time for us to estimate either the timing or outcome of any of those matters, or whether any potential loss, or range of potential losses, is probable or reasonably estimable.


Regulatory Matters and Litigation


On May 2, 2013,October 30, 2017, the government filedCompany entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) to resolve civil litigation under the False Claims Act complaint againstbrought by the CompanyUnited States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) on behalf of the OIG and certain of its hospice-related subsidiariesvarious relators concerning VITAS, filed in the U.S. District Court forof the Western District of Missouri, United States v. VITAS Hospice Services, LLC, et al., No. 4:13-cv-00449-BCW (the “2013 Action”).  PriorMissouri. The Company denied any violation of law and agreed to that date,settlement without admission of wrongdoing.

In connection with the Company received various qui tam lawsuits and subpoenas from the U.S. Department of Justice and OIG that have been previously disclosed.  The 2013 Action alleges that, since at least 2002,settlement VITAS and since 2004,certain of its subsidiaries entered into a corporate integrity agreement (“CIA”) on October 30, 2017. The CIA formalizes various aspects of VITAS’ already existing Compliance Program and contains requirements designed to document compliance with federal healthcare program requirements. It has a term of five years during which it imposes monitoring, reporting, certification, oversight, screening and training obligations, certain of which had previously been implemented by VITAS. It also requires VITAS to engage an Independent Review Organization to perform audit and review functions and to prepare reports regarding compliance with federal healthcare programs. In the Company, submitted or caused the submissionevent of false claims to the Medicare program by (a) billing Medicare for continuous home care services when the patients were not eligible, the services were not provided, or the medical care was inappropriate, and (b) billing Medicare for patients who were not eligible for the Medicare hospice benefit because they did not have a life expectancy of six months or less if their illnesses ran their normal course.  This complaint seeks treble damages, statutory penalties, and the costsbreach of the action, plus interest.  The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on September 24, 2013.  On September 30, 2014, the Court denied the motion, except to the extent that claims were filed before July 24, 2002. On November 13, 2014, the government filed a Second Amended Complaint.  The Second Amended Complaint changed and supplemented someCIA, VITAS could become liable for payment of the allegations, but did not otherwise expand the causes of actionstipulated penalties or the nature of the relief sought against VITAS.  VITAS filed its Answer to the Second Amended Complaint on August 11, 2015.  Based on recent case developments, including recent mediation discussions with the U.S. Department of Justice, we believe it probable that this matter willcould be settled, to include payments of $55.8 million after-tax ($90.0 million pretax) including attorneys’ fees.  A final settlement will require the parties to resolve several outstanding issues, and to draft and negotiate definitive documentation.  There can be no assurance that such a final definitive settlement will be reached on these, or other, terms.  For additional procedural history of this litigation, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings.  The costs incurred related to U.S. v. Vitas and related regulatory matters were $935,000 and $599,000 for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the net costs were $5.2 million and $4.1 million respectively.


Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 includes the $55.8 million of after-tax expense ($90 million pre-tax) for the accrual of such potential litigation settlement.  As required by GAAP, the Company accrues for contingent loss claimsexcluded from participation in its financial statements when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

federal healthcare programs.

The Company entered into a settlement agreement in March 2019 that will resolve state-wide wage and certain current and former directors and officers are defendants in a case captioned In re Chemed Corp. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (CJB) (D. Del.), which was consolidated on February 2, 2015.


On February 2, 2015, the Court appointed KBC Asset Management NV the sole lead plaintiff and its counsel, the sole lead and liaison counsel. On March 3, 2015, Lead Plaintiff KBC designated its Complaint as the operative complaint in the consolidated proceedings and defendants renewed a previously filed motion to dismiss those claims and allegations.  The consolidated Complaint named fourteen individual defendants, together with the Company as nominal defendant.  The Complaint alleges a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the individual defendants for allegedly permitting the Company to submit false claims to the U.S. government.  The Complaint seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees.  On May 12, 2016, the Court issued a Memorandum Order granting Chemed’s motion to dismiss, and  dismissing Lead Plaintiff KBC’s Complaint without prejudice to KBC’s opportunity to file within 30 days of the date of the Court’s Order (i.e., by June 13, 2016) an amended Complaint addressing the deficiencies in its duty of loyalty claim.  Lead Plaintiff KBC did not file an amended Complaint within the time specified by the Court.
-11-

However, on June 13, 2016, counsel for Chemed shareholder Michael Kvint filed a letter with the Court requesting a two-week extension to file a motion to substitute Mr. Kvint as lead plaintiff, in place of Lead Plaintiff KBC and to file an amended Complaint.  Alternatively, counsel for Mr. Kvint requested that any dismissal of the action be with prejudice to KBC only.  On June 14, 2016, Chemed filed a reply letter with the Court, reserving its rights to oppose any motion filed by Mr. Kvint and, if warranted, to oppose any other actions taken by Mr. Kvint to proceed with the action (including by filing an untimely amended Complaint).  On June 21, 2016, the Court entered an Oral Order providing Mr. Kvint until June 30, 2016 to file a Motion to Substitute and Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint.  On that date, Mr. Kvint filed, under seal, a Motion to Substitute Plaintiff and File Amended Complaint, and attached a Proposed Amended Complaint.    Mr. Kvint’s motion was fully briefed by the parties.  On April 25, 2017, Magistrate Judge Burke issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court permit Mr. Kvint to intervene as Lead Plaintiff and grant leave to amend the complaint to replead the duty of loyalty claim only.  On May 16, 2017, Chief Judge Stark signed an Order adopting that Report and Recommendation.  Plaintiff Kvint filed a Corrected Amended Complaint on May 30, 2017.  On September 13, 2017, the Court entered an order dismissing with prejudice the claims against defendants Timothy S. O’Toole and Joel F. Gemunder and permitting Defendants to file a Motion to Dismiss the Corrected Amended Complaint on or before September 29, 2017, with Plaintiff’s Answering Brief to be filed on or before December 1, 2017, and Defendants’ Reply Brief to be filed on or before December 29, 2017.  Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss timely.  As the Company has previously disclosed, the legal fees and costs associated with defending against this lawsuit are presently being paid by insurance. For additional procedural history of this litigation, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings.

Jordan Seper, (“Seper”) a Registered Nurse at VITAS' Inland Empire program from May 12, 2014 to March 21, 2015, filed a lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court on September 26, 2016.  She alleged VITAS Healthcare Corp of CA (“VITAS CA”) (1) failed to provide minimum wage for all hours worked; (2) failed to provide overtime for all hours worked; (3) failed to provide a second meal period; (4) failed to provide rest breaks; (5) failed to indemnify for necessary expenditures; (6) failed to timely pay wages due at time of separation; and (7) engaged in unfair business practices.  Seper seeks a state-widehour class action of current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITASclaims raised in California within the four years preceding the filing of the lawsuit.  She seeks court determination that this action may be maintained as a class action for the entire California class and subclasses, designation as class representative, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, damages (including wages for regular or overtime hours allegedly worked but not paid, premium payments for missed meal or rest periods, and unreimbursed expenses), all applicable penalties associated with each claim, pre and post-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees and costs.  Seper served VITAS CA with the lawsuitseparate cases: (1) Jordan A. Seper on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corp of CA, a business entity unknown; and DOES 1 to 100,, inclusive; inclusive; Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number BC 642857 on October 13, 2016.

On November 14, 2016, the Parties filed a Stipulation to transfer the venue of the lawsuit from San Francisco to Los Angeles.  The Los Angeles Superior Court Complex Division accepted transfer of the case on December 6, 2016 and stayed the case.  On December 16, 2016, VITAS CA filed its Answer and served written discovery on Seper.

(“Seper”); (2) Jiwan Chhina ("Chhina")v. VITAS Health Services of California, Inc., hired bya California corporation; VITAS asHealthcare Corporation of California, a Home Health Aide on February 5, 2002, is currentlyDelaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Licensed Vocational Nurse for VITAS' San Diego program.  On September 27, 2016, Chhina filed a lawsuit inDelaware corporation dba VITAS Healthcare Inc.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; San Diego Superior Court allegingCase Number 37-2015-00033978-CU-OE-CTL (“Chhina”) (which was subsequently merged with Seper); (3) Chere Phillips and Lady Moore v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2017-0021-2755 (“Phillips and Moore”); and (4) Williams v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG 17853886 (“Williams”). These actions were brought by both current and former employees including a registered nurse, a licensed vocational nurse (LVN), home health aides and a social worker. Each action stated multiple claims generally including (1) failure to pay minimum wage for all hours worked; (2) failure to provide overtime for all hours worked; (3) failure to pay wages for all hours at the regular rate; (4) failure to provide meal periods; (5) failure to provide rest breaks; (6) failure to provide complete and accurate wage statements; (7) failure to pay for all reimbursement expenses; (8) unfair business practices; and (9) violation of the California Private Attorneys General Act. Chhina seeksThe

-17-


cases generally asserted claims on behalf of classes defined to pursue these claims in the form of a state-wide class action ofinclude all current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITAS in California within the four years preceding the filing of each lawsuit. For additional procedural history of these cases, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings.

The Seper and Chhina cases were consolidated in Los Angeles County Superior Court; Chhina was dismissed as a separate action and joined with Seper in the lawsuit.  He seeksfiling of amended complaint on August 28, 2018, in which both Chhina and Seper were identified as named plaintiffs. Discovery in the remaining cases was stayed as to class claims and each court determination that this action may be maintainedwas advised of the pendency of the consolidated Seper/Chhina action. The parties engaged in a mediation process beginning in October 2018 and concluded with an agreement in March 2019. The settlement amount of $5.75 million plus employment taxes was recorded in the first quarter of 2019. As of December 31, 2019, $6.0 million was accrued in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. The definition of the class to participate in the settlement is intended to cover claims raised in the consolidated Seper/Chhina matter, claims raised in Phillips and Moore, as well as any class claims in Williams. On January 28, 2020, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement. A notice of the proposed settlement has been sent to the members of the class by the class claims administrator. The court has set the date for the final approval of the settlement hearing for May 21, 2020.

Alfred Lax (“Lax”), a current employee of Roto-Rooter Services Company (“RRSC”), was hired in RRSC’s Menlo Park branch in 2007. On November 30, 2018, Lax filed a class action for the entire California class and subclasses, designation as class representative, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, damages (including wages for regular or overtime hours allegedly worked but not paid, premium payments for missed meal or rest periods, and unreimbursed expenses), all applicable penalties associated with each claim, pre-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees and costs.  Chhina served VITAS CA with the lawsuit, Jiwann Chhina v. VITAS Health Services of California, Inc., a California corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation dba VITAS Healthcare, Inc.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; San Diego Superior Court Case Number 37-2015-00033978-CU-OE-CTL on November 3, 2016.  On December 1, 2016, VITAS CA filed its Answer and served written discovery on Chhina.


On May 19, 2017, Chere Phillips (a Home Health Aide in Sacramento) and Lady Moore (a former Social Worker in Sacramento) filed a lawsuit against VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California in SacramentoSanta Clara County Superior Court alleging claims for (1) failure to pay all wages due;provide or compensate for required rest breaks; (2) failure to authorize and permit rest periods;properly pay for all hours worked; (3) failure to provide off-duty meal periods;accurate wage statements; (4) failure to furnish accurate wage statements;reimburse for work-related expenses; and (5) unreimbursedunfair business expenses; (6) waiting time penalties; (7) violations of unfair competition law; and (8) violation of the Private Attorney General Act.  The case is captioned: Chere Phillips and Lady Moore v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2017-0021-2755.  Plaintiffs sought to pursuepractices. Lax stated these claims in the formas a representative of a state-wide class action of current and former non-exempt employeesdefined as all service technicians employed with VITAS CAby RRSC in California withinduring the four years preceding the filing of the lawsuit.  Plaintiffs served VITAS withcomplaint. He seeks a determination that the action may proceed and be maintained as a class action and for compensatory and statutory damages (premium payments for missed rest periods, uncompensated rest periods, wages for time allegedly not paid such as travel time, repair time, and vehicle maintenance time, and unreimbursed expenses), penalties and restitutions, pre- and post-judgement interest and attorneys’ fees and costs. The lawsuit is, Alfred Lax on June 5, 2017. VITAS CA timely answered the Complaint generally denying the Plaintiffs’ allegations.  The Court has stayedbehalf of himself and all class discovery in this case pending resolution of the November 10, 2017 mediation in the Seperothers similarly situated v. Roto-Rooter Services Company, and Chhina cases.
-12-

There are currently three other lawsuits against VITAS pending in the superior courts of other California counties that contain claims and class periods that substantially overlap with Phillips’ and Moore’s claims.  These are Seper, v. VITAS Healthcare Corp of California et al., filed on September 26, 2016 in Los AngelesDoes 1 through 50 inclusive; Santa Clara County Superior Court BC 642857; Chhina v. VITAS Health Service, Inc. et al., filed on September 27, 2016 in San Diego County Superior Court, 34-2015-00033998 CU_OE_CTL; both described above and Williams v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, filed on May 22, 2017 in Alameda County Superior Court, RG 17853886.

Jazzina Williams’ (a Home Health Aide in Sacramento) lawsuit alleges claims for (1) failure to pay all wages due; (2) failure to authorize and permit rest periods; (3) failure to provide off-duty meal periods; (4) failure to furnish accurate wage statements; (5) unreimbursed business expenses; (6) waiting time penalties; and (7) violations of the Private Attorney General Act.  Williams seeks to pursue these claims in the form of a state-wide class action of current and former non-exempt employees.  Plaintiff served VITAS with the lawsuit on May 31, 2017.  VITAS timely answered the Complaint generally denying Plaintiff’s allegations.  Williams is pursuing discovery of her individual claims and has agreed to a stay of class discovery pending outcome of a November 10, 2017 mediation of the Seper and Chhina cases.  Defendant filed and served each of Plaintiffs Williams, Phillips, and Moore with a Notice of Related Cases on July 19, 2017.

Defendant understands that the Seper and Chhina cases will be effectively consolidated in Los Angeles County Superior court: Chhina will be dismissed as a separate action and joined with Seper through the filing of an amended complaint in Seper in which Chhina is also identified as a named plaintiff.

Case Number 18CV338652.

The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the probability of loss or range of loss for any of these lawsuits at this time.


time, with the exception of Seper/Chhina, Phillips and Moore and the class claims in Williams.

The Company intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in each of the above lawsuits.Lax lawsuit. Regardless of the outcome of any of the preceding matters, dealing with the various regulatory agencies and opposing parties can adversely affect us through defense costs, potential payments, withholding of governmental funding, diversion of management time, and related publicity. Although the Company intends to defend them vigorously, there can be no assurance that those suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.


12.    Concentration of Risk


During

As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, approximately 70% and 71%, respectively, of VITAS’ total accounts receivable balance were from Medicare and 25% and 24%, respectively, of VITAS’ total accounts receivable balance were due from various state Medicaid or managed Medicaid programs. Combined accounts receivable from Medicare, Medicaid, and managed Medicaid represent approximately 75% of the quarter consolidated net accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2020.

VITAS hadhas a pharmacy services agreementscontract with one1 service provider to providefor specified pharmacy services for VITAS andrelated to its hospice patients.  VITAS madeoperations. A large majority of VITAS’ pharmaceutical purchases are from this provider of $7.7 and $24.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively. Vitas made purchases from two providers of $9.5 and $26.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively.  Purchases from these providers were more than 90% of all pharmacy services usedvendor. The pharmaceuticals purchased by VITAS during each period presented.


are available through many providers in the United States. However, a disruption from VITAS’ main service provider could adversely impact VITAS’ operations, including temporary logistical challenges and increased cost associated with getting medication to our patients.

13.    Cash Overdrafts and Cash Equivalents


There are $468,000 in0 cash overdrafts payable included in accounts payable at September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 (December 31, 20162019 - $8.6$9.8 million).


From time to time throughout the year, we invest excess cash in money market funds with major commercial banks. We closely monitor the creditworthiness of the institutions with which we invest our overnight funds. The amount invested was less than $100,000not material for each balance sheet date presented.


14.    Financial Instruments


FASB’s authoritative guidance on fair value measurements defines a hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs in fair value measurements. Level 1 measurements are measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 measurements use significant other observable inputs. Level 3 measurements are measurements using significant unobservable inputs which require a company to develop its own assumptions. In recording the fair value of assets and liabilities, companies must use the most reliable measurement available.

-13-

-18-



The following shows the carrying value, fair value and the hierarchy for our financial instruments as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 (in thousands):

Fair Value Measure

Carrying Value

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)

Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)

Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Mutual fund investments of deferred

compensation plans held in trust

$

72,296 

$

72,296 

$

-

$

-

Total debt

160,000 

-

160,000 

-

     Fair Value Measure 
  Carrying Value  
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
 (Level 1)
  
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Mutual fund investments of deferred            
compensation plans held in trust $60,445  $60,445  $-  $- 
Total debt  82,500   -   82,500   - 

The following shows the carrying value, fair value and the hierarchy for our financial instruments as of December 31, 20162019 (in thousands):

Fair Value Measure

Carrying Value

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)

Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)

Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

Mutual fund investments of deferred

compensation plans held in trust

$

77,446 

$

77,446 

$

-

$

-

Total debt

90,000 

-

90,000 

-


     Fair Value Measure 
  Carrying Value  
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
Mutual fund investments of deferred            
compensation plans held in trust $54,389  $54,389  $-  $- 
Total debt  108,750   -   108,750   - 

For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the liquidity and short-term nature of these instruments. As further described in Footnote 5, our outstanding long-term debt and current portion of long-term debt have floating interest rates that are reset at short-term intervals, generally 30 or 60 days. The interest rate we pay also includes an additional amount based on our current leverage ratio. As such, we believe our borrowings reflect significant nonperformance risks, mainly credit risk. Based on these factors, we believe the fair value of our long-term debt and current portion of long-term debt approximate the carrying value.


15.    Capital Stock Repurchase Plan Transactions


We repurchased the following capital stock for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:stock:

Three months ended March 31,

2020

2019

Total cost of repurchased shares (in thousands)

$

100,235

$

49,250 

Shares repurchased

225,000

150,000 

Weighted average price per share

$

445.49

$

328.33 

  Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
             
Total cost of repurchased shares (in thousands) $9,576  $-  $94,640  $102,313 
Shares repurchased  50,000  -   500,000   780,134 
Weighted average price per share $191.52  $-  $189.28  $131.15 

In March 2017,2020, the Board of Directors authorized an additional $100.0$250.0 million for stock repurchase under Chemed’s existing share repurchase program. We currently have $55.5 million$253.8 million of authorizationauthorization remaining under this share repurchase plan.


-14-

16.    Recent Accounting Standards


In May 2014,March 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers” which2020-04 - Reference Rate Reform”. The update provides additional guidanceoptional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue.contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another rate expected to be discontinued. The standard and subsequent amendments are intended to develop a common revenue standard for removing inconsistencies and weaknesses, improve comparability, provide more useful information to users through improved disclosure requirements, and simplify the preparation of financial statements. This guidance and subsequent amendments areupdate is effective for fiscal years beginning afterall entities as of March 12, 2020 and will apply through December 15, 2017.    At both VITAS and Roto-Rooter, we have performed an initial analysis to determine the appropriate aggregation of customers into portfolios with similar collection and service requirement characteristics.  This analysis31, 2022. The interest rate charged on borrowings from our existing revolver is currently being refined to ensure the portfolios identified will result in a materially consistent revenue recognition pattern that would result as if each customer were evaluated separately.  Additionally, based on our initial evaluation, we believeLIBOR. The credit agreement includes provisions for modifying the majority of our provision for bad debts, currently classifiedinterest rate in selling, general and administrative expense in our Statements of Income,the instance that LIBOR is discontinued. As a result, no contract modifications will be reclassified as a contra-revenue as it will be considered an implicit price concession at the time servicerequired when LIBOR is performed.  For the nine month period ended September 30, 2017, our total provision for bad debt is $13.0 million.  We anticipate a modified retrospective adoption of the ASU.


discontinued.

In February 2016,December 2019, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2016-022019-12Leases” which introduces a lessee model that brings most leases onSimplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes”. The ASU adds new guidance to simplify accounting for income taxes, changes the accounting for certain income tax transactions and makes minor improvements to the balance sheets and updates lessor accounting  to align with changes in the lessee model and the revenue recognition standard.codifications. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018.  Based on the provisions of the ASU, we anticipate a material increase in both assets and liabilities when our current operating lease contracts are recorded on the balance sheet.  We do not currently have a specific estimate of the impact.


In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2016-15 – Cash Flow Classification” which amends guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows.  The primary purpose of ASU 2016-15 is to reduce diversity in practice related to eight specific cash flow issues.  The guidance in this ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.    We have analyzed the impact of ASU 2016-15 on our statement of cash flows and do not expect it to have a material effect.

In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2017-4 – Intangibles – Goodwill and Other”.  To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, the FASB eliminated Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test.  The guidance in the ASU is effective for the Company in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019.  Early adoption is permitted.on January 1, 2021. We anticipate adoptionare currently evaluating the impact of this standard will have no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

-19-


17.    GoodwillAcquisitions

On August 2, 2019, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) to purchase substantially all of the assets of HSW RR, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“HSW”) and certain related assets of its affiliates, for $120 million, subject to a working capital adjustment that resulted in an additional $1.4 million payment to HSW. HSW owned and operated fourteen Roto-Rooter franchises mainly in the southwestern section of the United States, including Los Angeles, Dallas and Phoenix. Included in the assets purchased were the assets of Western Drain Supply, Inc., a plumbing supply company. The purchase was made using a combination of cash on-hand and borrowings under Chemed’s existing $450 million revolving credit facility. On September 16, 2019, we completed the acquisition.

On July 1, 2019, we completed the acquisition of a Roto-Rooter franchise and the related assets in Oakland, CA for $18.0 million in cash.

The acquisitions were made as a continuation of Roto-Rooter’s strategy to re-acquire franchises in large markets in the United States. The allocation for the two acquisitions completed in 2019 is as follows (in thousands):

HSW

Oakland

Total

Goodwill

$

56,191

$

10,535

$

66,726

Reacquired franchise rights

52,980

6,190

59,170

Property, plant, and equipment

5,998

675

6,673

Working capital

3,760

22

3,782

Customer relationships

2,220

500

2,720

Non-compete agreements

140

100

240

Other assets and liabilities - net

128

23

151

$

121,417

$

18,045

$

139,462

Reacquired franchise rights, included in identifiable intangibles on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are amortized over the period remaining in each individual franchise agreement. The average amortization period for reacquired franchise rights for the acquisitions made in the third quarter of 2019 is 7.4 years.

The franchise fee revenue, the valuation of reacquired franchise rights and amortization for the acquired franchises are as follows:

Annualized

Valuation

Amortization of

2018 Franchise

of Reacquired

Reacquired

Revenue

Franchise Rights

Franchise Rights

HSW

$

1,782

$

52,980

$

7,258

Oakland

95

6,190

825

Subtotal

1,877

$

59,170

$

8,083

All other franchise territories

4,505

$

6,382



-20-


Amortization of reacquired franchise rights comprises the following (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31,

2020

2019

$

2,352 

$

441 

Customer relationships, included in identifiable intangibles on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are amortized over an average amortization period of 20.4 years. Non-compete agreements are amortized over the period of the agreement. The average amortization period for non-compete agreements for the transactions made in the third quarter of 2019 is 4.0 years.

Goodwill is assessed for impairment on a yearly basis as of October 1. The primary factor that contributed to the purchase price resulting in the recognition of goodwill is operational efficiencies expected as a result of consolidating stand- alone franchises and Roto-Rooter’s network of nationwide branches. All goodwill recognized is deductible for tax purposes.

The pro forma revenue and earnings of the Company for March 31, 2019, as if all acquisitions made in fiscal 2019 were completed on January 1, 2019, are as follows: (in thousands, except per share data):

Service revenues and sales

$

484,106 

Net income

$

47,936 

Earnings per share

$

3.00 

Diluted earnings per share

$

2.90 

Shown below is movement in Goodwill (in thousands):

VITAS

Roto-Rooter

Total

Balance at December 31, 2019

$

333,331 

$

244,036 

$

577,367 

Foreign currency adjustments

-

(131)

(131)

Balance at March 31, 2020

$

333,331 

$

243,905 

$

577,236 

  Vitas  Roto-Rooter  Total 
Balance at December 31, 2016 $328,301  $144,065  $472,366 
Business combinations  -   481   481 
Foreign currency adjustments  -   177   177 
Balance at September 30, 2017 $328,301  $144,723  $473,024 

During 2017, we completed one business combination within the Roto-Rooter segment for $525,000 in cash to increase our market penetration.


-15-

-21-



Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Executive Summary

We operate through our two wholly-owned subsidiaries, VITAS Healthcare Corporation and Roto-Rooter Group, Inc. VITAS focuses on hospice care that helps make terminally ill patients’ final days as comfortable as possible. Through its teams of doctors, nurses, home health aides, social workers, clergy and volunteers, VITAS provides direct medical services to patients, as well as spiritual and emotional counseling to both patients and their families. Roto-Rooter’s services are focused on providing plumbing, drain cleaning, water restoration and other related services to both residential and commercial customers. Through its network of company-owned branches, independent contractors and franchisees, Roto-Rooter offers plumbing and drain cleaning service to over 90% of the U.S. population.


The following is a summary of the key operating results (in thousands except per share amounts):

Three months ended March 31,

2020

2019

Service revenues and sales

$

515,798

$

462,034

Net income

$

55,891

$

44,667

Diluted EPS

$

3.38

$

2.70

Adjusted net income

$

60,715

$

48,175

Adjusted diluted EPS

$

3.68

$

2.92

Adjusted EBITDA

$

93,029

$

74,798

Adjusted EBITDA as a % of revenue

18.0

%

16.2

%

  Three months ended September 30,  Nine months ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Service revenues and sales $417,444  $392,607  $1,238,367  $1,173,405 
Net income $35,437  $26,829  $43,625  $76,554 
Diluted EPS $2.13  $1.62  $2.60  $4.54 
Adjusted net income $35,772  $28,643  $102,174  $86,625 
Adjusted diluted EPS $2.15  $1.73  $6.10  $5.14 
Adjusted EBITDA $67,604  $57,387  $195,921  $170,391 
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of revenue  16.2%  14.6%  15.8%  14.5%

Adjusted net income, adjusted diluted EPS, earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of revenue are not measures derived in accordance with US GAAP. We provide non-GAAP measures to help readers evaluate our operating results and to compare our operating performance with that of similar companies that have different capital structures. Our non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable measures presented in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures is presented on pages 30-32.


Both VITAS and Roto-Rooter have significant operations in Houston and south Florida.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 we did not experience any material business interruptions or loss of assets related to the hurricanes in Houston or Florida.

Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 includes $55.8 million ($3.33 per share) of after-tax expense ($90 million pre-tax) for the accrual of a potential litigation settlement related to the May 2, 2013 complaint filed against the Company by the U.S. Department of Justice.  As required by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, the Company accrues for contingent loss claims in its financial statements when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.  Based on recent case developments, including recent mediation discussions with the U.S. Department of Justice, the Company believes that it is probable that this matter will be settled, and that such settlement will include settlement payments and relator attorney fees, by the Company of approximately the accrued amount.  However, the achievement of a final, definitive settlement will require the parties to resolve several outstanding issues (and draft and negotiate related definitive documentation), and there can be no assurance that such a final, definitive settlement will be reached and agreed on these or other terms.

32-33.

For the three months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2020, the increase in consolidated service revenues and sales was driven by a 17.1%14.6% increase at Roto-Rooter and a 2.2%10.1% increase at VITAS. The increase in service revenues at Roto-Rooter was driven by an increase in all major service lines. Of Roto-Rooter’s total revenue increase, 49.1% is related to water restoration.lines as well as a result of acquisitions completed in 2019. The increase in service revenues at VITAS wasis comprised primarily of a result of5.9% increase in days-of-care, a geographically weighted average Medicare reimbursement rates increasing 1.3%rate increase of approximately 5.0%, a 2.8% increase in days of care, offset byand acuity mix shift which then reduced the Medicare rate increase approximately 0.9%. See page 34 for additional VITAS operating metrics.

The recent COVID-19 pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, results of operations, cash flow and financial position. We are closely monitoring the impact of the pandemic on all aspects of our business including impacts to employees, customers, patients, suppliers and vendors. The Company’s two operating subsidiaries have been categorized as critical infrastructure businesses and are not currently materially limited by federal, state or local regulations that restrict movement or operating ability.

The continued health of our workforce cannot be predicted during the pandemic. Significant shortages of labor could inhibit the ability of both VITAS and Roto-Rooter to perform services. The inability to procure personal-protective equipment, and to protect worker health and customer safety, could negatively impacted revenue 2.2% when comparedimpact the health of our workforce. A portion of our workforce is currently working from remote locations on a regular basis which increases both operational and cybersecurity risks.

VITAS is working closely with hospitals, doctors and other healthcare providers. The response of these healthcare providers to the prior year period.  Adjusted EBITDA as a percentpandemic may limit VITAS’ ability to provide care and may result in fewer referrals. A prolonged or severe economic downturn may significantly impact Roto-Rooter’s service revenue. A significant disruption in the supply chain for critical items needed by either VITAS or Roto-Rooter could inhibit our ability to provide services or significantly increase the cost of revenue increased 160 basis points when comparedproviding those services.

The length and severity of the pandemic, coupled with related governmental actions including relief acts and actions relating to our workforce at federal, state and local levels, and underlying economic disruption will determine the prior year quarter mainlyultimate short-term and long-term impact to our business operations and financial results. We are unable to predict the myriad of possible issues that could arise or the ultimate effect to our businesses as a result of mix shift in levelsthe unknown short, medium and long-term impacts that the pandemic will have on the United States economy and society as a whole.

Identified direct costs incurred for the three-months ended March 31, 2020 related to COVID-19 are $1.8 million. These costs are comprised primarily of care and improved cost management for high acuity care.  See page 33 for additional VITAS operating metrics.


For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the increase in consolidated service revenues and sales was driven by a 14.4% increaseexpected credit losses at Roto-Rooter, additional personal protective equipment and a 2.0% increasesanitizing supplies at VITAS.  The increase in service revenues atboth VITAS and Roto-Rooter was drivenand paid time-off for employees potentially directly affected by an increase in all major service lines. Of Roto-Rooter’s totalCOVID-19. These costs do

-22-


not include estimates for lost revenue, increase, 49.0% wasoperational inefficiencies related to water restoration.excess utilization of supplies, equipment and field staffing, diversion of existing infrastructure resources to allow for operating during a pandemic, or diversion of management and administrative time to address COVID-19 issues, while continuing to operate both business segments. We anticipate costs during the second quarter of 2020 and the remainder of calendar 2020 to be significantly higher than what were incurred during the first quarter of 2020, given the timing of the onset and spread of the pandemic. Additionally, VITAS implemented a program that awards more than 10,000 frontline employees an additional two weeks of paid time off (“PTO”) in 2020. VITAS estimates the additional PTO to cost approximately $23.2 million, prior to employee benefit and payroll tax costs.

On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was passed. It is intended to provide economic relief to individuals and businesses affected by the coronavirus pandemic. It also contains provisions related to healthcare providers’ operations and the issues caused by the coronavirus pandemic. The increase in service revenues at VITAS was primarily a result of Medicare reimbursement rates increasing 1.7%, a 2.7% increase in days of care, offset by acuity mix shift which negatively impacted revenue 2.4% when compared to the prior year period.  Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of revenue increased 130 basis points when compared to the prior year quarter mainlyfollowing significant economic impacts for Chemed and its subsidiaries as a result of mix shiftspecific provisions of the CARES Act:

Chemed deferred its first quarter 2020 income tax payment of $8.8 million to the Federal government until July 15, 2020, as permitted by the CARES Act. In addition, Chemed and its subsidiaries deferred payment of certain employer payroll taxes and certain state tax payments, as permitted by the CARES Act.

A portion of the CARES Act provides $100 billion from the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund (“Relief Fund”) to hospitals and other healthcare providers on the front lines of the coronavirus response. Of this $100 billion distribution from the Relief Fund, $30 billion was designated to be automatically distributed to facilities and healthcare providers based upon their 2019 Medicare fee-for-service revenue. On April 10, 2020 VITAS automatically received $80.2 million from the Relief Fund based upon VITAS’s 2019 Medicare fee-for-service Medicare revenue. While specific details of the program have not been announced, recipients of this $30 billion in CARES Act relief are specified to use these funds to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus, and shall reimburse the recipient only for health care related expenses or lost revenues that are attributable to coronavirus. The ability of VITAS to retain and utilize the full $80.2 million from the Relief Fund will depend on the magnitude, timing and nature of the economic impact of COVID-19 within VITAS, as well as the guidelines and rules of the Relief Fund program.

During the period from May 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020, the 2% sequestration reimbursement cut is suspended. VITAS anticipates this will increase revenue approximately $15 million to $20 million, excluding the impact of the Medicare Cap.

In addition to the economic impacts, the CARES Act coupled with a series of waivers and guidance issued by the Centers for Medical and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) suspended various Medicare patient coverage criteria and documentation, as well as care requirements. For VITAS, the relief includes the temporary waiver of the requirement to use volunteers and to conduct a nurse visit every two weeks to evaluate aides. Additionally, CMS permitted expanded use of telehealth in providing hospice care to patients.

The situation surrounding COVID-19 remains fluid. We evaluate our cash flow, liquidity and capital resources on a daily basis. VITAS and Roto-Rooter continue to operate and have positive net income and operating cash flow. We have $252.1 million available for borrowing under our $450 million revolving line-of-credit.

On August 6, 2019, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released the fiscal year 2020 hospice wage index and payment rate update (FY 2020 update). The FY 2020 update includes the normal yearly inflationary increase by level of care plus a rebasing of the continuous care, inpatient care and respite care rates. The rebasing of these levels of care was to reflect non-inflationary changes in providers’ costs over time. The rebasing increased the national average reimbursement rate for continuous care by 39.9% and improved cost managementinpatient care by 34.7%. Respite care is not material to our operations. The rebasing of these levels of care was effective on October 1, 2019.

On August 2, 2019, we entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”) to purchase substantially all of the assets of HSW RR, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“HSW”) and certain related assets of its affiliates, for high acuity care.  See page 33 for additional VITAS operating metrics.


VITAS expects its full-year 2017 revenue growth, prior$120 million, subject to Medicare cap, to bea working capital adjustment. HSW owned and operated fourteen Roto-Rooter franchises mainly in the rangesouthwestern section of 2.0% to 3.0%.  Admissionsthe United States, including Los Angeles, Dallas and Average Daily Census in 2017 are estimated to expand approximately 2.0% to 3.0%.  Adjusted EBITDA margin, prior to Medicare cap, is estimated to be 15.0%.  This guidance includes $1.5 million for Medicare cap billing limitations. Roto-Rooter expects full-year 2017 revenue growth of 13.0% to 14.0%.  The revenue estimate is a based upon increased job pricing of approximately 2.0% and continued growth in water restoration services.  Adjusted EBITDA margin for 2017 is estimatedPhoenix. Included in the rangeassets purchased were the assets of 22.5%.  We anticipateWestern Drain Supply, Inc., a plumbing supply company. The purchase was made using a combination of cash on-hand and borrowings under Chemed’s existing $450 million revolving credit facility. On September 16, 2019, we completed the acquisition.

On July 1, 2019, we completed the acquisition of a Roto-Rooter franchise and the related assets in Oakland, CA for $18.0 million in cash.

Reacquired franchise rights, included in identifiable intangibles on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, are amortized over the period remaining in each individual franchise agreement. The average amortization period for reacquired franchise rights for the acquisitions made in the third quarter of 2019 is 7.4 years.

The franchise fee revenue, the valuation of reacquired franchise rights and amortization for the acquired franchises are as follows:

-23-


Multiple of Annual

Annualized

Valuation

Franchise Fees

Amortization of

2018 Franchise

of Reacquired

to Reacquired

Reacquired

Revenue

Franchise Rights

Franchise Rights

Franchise Rights

HSW

$

1,782

$

52,980

29.7

yrs

$

7,258

Oakland

95

6,190

65.2

825

Subtotal

1,877

$

59,170

31.5

yrs

$

8,083

All other franchise territories

4,505

$

6,382

Amortization of reacquired franchise agreements comprises the following (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31,

2020

2019

$

2,352 

$

441 

Regarding our outlook for 2020, operating during the pandemic has the potential to materially impact the operational metrics and overall operating results of the Company. However, it is expected that our operating income and cash flowsthe CARES Act funds received by Vitas will be sufficient to operatesubstantially offset anticipated costs and lost revenue related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Roto-Rooter is anticipated to receive minimal financial support from the CARES Act. However, it is important to consider Roto-Rooter’s main service is to stop water and raw sewage from flowing and causing destruction to residential and commercial structures. It is primarily a necessity and grudge service that has historically been resistant to even the deepest of recessions. We are early into the disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and related shutdown of significant portions of our businesseseconomy. It is premature, and meet any commitments forin fact impossible, to reasonably measure or predict the foreseeable future.

-16-

impact COVID-19 will have on Roto-Rooter’s full year 2020 operating results. Recognizing these issues, we anticipate providing updated 2020 earnings guidance when we issue our second quarter 2020 operating results.

Financial Condition

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Material changes in the balance sheet accounts from December 31, 20162019 to September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 include the following:


A $40.5$22.8 million increase in cash and cash equivalents due to timing of payments from the Federal government.

A $9.1 million decrease in accounts receivable due mainly to timing of Medicarereceipts.

A $5.2 million decrease in investments of deferred compensation plans and Medicaid payments.

A $21.8a $6.1 million increasedecrease in properties plant and equipment mainlydeferred compensation liabilities due to stock market losses and retirement payments made from the purchase of transportation equipment during the quarter.
plan.

A $36.2 million increase in net deferred taxes associated with amounts recorded for a potential litigation settlement.

A $4.8$13.3 million decrease in accounts payable mainly due to timing of payments.

A $12.3 increase in income taxes due to timing of payments.

An $89.6$6.2 million increase in accrued legalinsurance related to the timing of policy years.

A $7.2 million decrease in accrued compensation due to a potential litigation settlement.

the payments of cash bonuses in the first quarter of 2020.

A $26.3$70.0 million decreaseincrease in long-term debt due mainly due to payments on our term loan and revolving line of credit.


borrowings related to stock repurchases.

A $111.5 million increase in treasury stock due mainly to stock repurchases.

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $62.6$15.7 million mainly as a result of a $22.9 million increase in net income excluding potential litigation settlement and a $19.5 million decrease caused by changes in accounts receivable.  The potential litigation settlement recorded is non-cash at September 30, 2017 and does not impact net cash provided by operating activities.


from March 31, 2019 to March 31, 2020. Significant changes in our accounts receivable balances are typically driven mainly by the timing of payments received from the Federal government at our VITAS subsidiary. We typically receive a payment in excess of $40.0 million from the Federal government from hospice services every other Friday. The timing of period end will have a significant impact on the accounts receivable at VITAS. These changes generally normalize over a two year period, as cash flow variations in one year are offset in the following year.

Management continually evaluates cash utilization alternatives, including share repurchase, debt repurchase, acquisitions and increased dividends to determine the most beneficial use of available capital resources.

On June 20, 2018, we replaced our existing credit agreement with the Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“2018 Credit Agreement”). Terms of the 2018 Credit Agreement consist of a five year, $450 million revolving credit facility and a $150 million expansion feature, which may consist of term loans or additional revolving commitments. The revolving credit facility has a five year maturity with principal payments due at maturity.  The interest rate at the inception of the agreement was LIBOR plus 100 basis points.


-24-


The 2018 Credit Agreement has a floating interest rate that is generally LIBOR plus a tiered additional rate which varies based on our current leverage ratio.

We have issued $35.6$37.9 million in standby letters of credit as of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2020, mainly for insurance purposes. Issued letters of credit reduce our available credit under the revolving credit agreement. As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2020, we have approximately $309.4$252.1 million of unused lines of credit available and eligible to be drawn down under our revolving credit facility. Management believes its liquidity and sources of capital are satisfactory for the Company’s needs in the foreseeable future.


Commitments and Contingencies

Collectively, the terms of our credit agreements require us to meet various financial covenants, to be tested quarterly. We are in compliance with all financial and other debt covenants as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 and anticipate remaining in compliance throughout the foreseeable future.


The VITAS segment of the Company’s business operates in a heavily-regulated industry. As a result, the Company is subjected to inquiries and investigations by various government agencies, which can result in penalties including repayment obligations, funding withholding, or debarment, as well as to lawsuits, including qui tam actions. The following sections describe the various ongoing material lawsuits and investigations of which the Company is currently aware. Other than as described below, with respect to U.S. v. Vitas, it is not possible at this time for us to estimate either the timing or outcome of any of those matters, or whether any potential loss, or range of potential losses, is probable or reasonably estimable.

-17-

On May 2, 2013,October 30, 2017, the government filedCompany entered into a settlement agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) to resolve civil litigation under the False Claims Act complaint againstbrought by the CompanyUnited States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) on behalf of the OIG and certain of its hospice-related subsidiariesvarious relators concerning VITAS, filed in the U.S. District Court forof the Western District of Missouri, United States v. VITAS Hospice Services, LLC, et al., No. 4:13-cv-00449-BCW (the “2013 Action”).  PriorMissouri. The Company denied any violation of law and agreed to that date,settlement without admission of wrongdoing.

In connection with the Company received various qui tam lawsuits and subpoenas from the U.S. Department of Justice and OIG that have been previously disclosed.  The 2013 Action alleges that, since at least 2002,settlement VITAS and since 2004,certain of its subsidiaries entered into a corporate integrity agreement (“CIA”) on October 30, 2017. The CIA formalizes various aspects of VITAS’ already existing Compliance Program and contains requirements designed to document compliance with federal healthcare program requirements. It has a term of five years during which it imposes monitoring, reporting, certification, oversight, screening and training obligations, certain of which had previously been implemented by VITAS. It also requires VITAS to engage an Independent Review Organization to perform audit and review functions and to prepare reports regarding compliance with federal healthcare programs. In the Company, submitted or caused the submissionevent of false claims to the Medicare program by (a) billing Medicare for continuous home care services when the patients were not eligible, the services were not provided, or the medical care was inappropriate, and (b) billing Medicare for patients who were not eligible for the Medicare hospice benefit because they did not have a life expectancy of six months or less if their illnesses ran their normal course.  This complaint seeks treble damages, statutory penalties, and the costsbreach of the action, plus interest.  The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on September 24, 2013.  On September 30, 2014, the Court denied the motion, except to the extent that claims were filed before July 24, 2002. On November 13, 2014, the government filed a Second Amended Complaint.  The Second Amended Complaint changed and supplemented someCIA, VITAS could become liable for payment of the allegations, but did not otherwise expand the causes of actionstipulated penalties or the nature of the relief sought against VITAS.  VITAS filed its Answer to the Second Amended Complaint on August 11, 2015.  Based on recent case developments, including recent mediation discussions with the U.S. Department of Justice, we believe it probable that this matter willcould be settled, to include payments of $55.8 million after-tax ($90.0 million pretax) including attorneys’ fees.  A final settlement will require the parties to resolve several outstanding issues, and to draft and negotiate definitive documentation.  There can be no assurance that such a final definitive settlement will be reached on these, or other, terms.  For additional procedural history of this litigation, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings.  The costs incurred related to U.S. v. Vitas and related regulatory matters were $935,000 and $599,000 for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the net costs were $5.2 million and $4.1 million respectively.


Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 includes the $55.8 million of after-tax expense ($90 million pre-tax) for the accrual of such potential litigation settlement.  As required by GAAP, the Company accrues for contingent loss claimsexcluded from participation in its financial statements when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

federal healthcare programs.

The Company entered into a settlement agreement in March 2019 that will resolve state-wide wage and certain current and former directors and officers are defendants in a case captioned In re Chemed Corp. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (CJB) (D. Del.), which was consolidated on February 2, 2015.


On February 2, 2015, the Court appointed KBC Asset Management NV the sole lead plaintiff and its counsel, the sole lead and liaison counsel. On March 3, 2015, Lead Plaintiff KBC designated its Complaint as the operative complaint in the consolidated proceedings and defendants renewed a previously filed motion to dismiss those claims and allegations.  The consolidated Complaint named fourteen individual defendants, together with the Company as nominal defendant.  The Complaint alleges a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the individual defendants for allegedly permitting the Company to submit false claims to the U.S. government.  The Complaint seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees.  On May 12, 2016, the Court issued a Memorandum Order granting Chemed’s motion to dismiss, and  dismissing Lead Plaintiff KBC’s Complaint without prejudice to KBC’s opportunity to file within 30 days of the date of the Court’s Order (i.e., by June 13, 2016) an amended Complaint addressing the deficiencies in its duty of loyalty claim.  Lead Plaintiff KBC did not file an amended Complaint within the time specified by the Court.

However, on June 13, 2016, counsel for Chemed shareholder Michael Kvint filed a letter with the Court requesting a two-week extension to file a motion to substitute Mr. Kvint as lead plaintiff, in place of Lead Plaintiff KBC and to file an amended Complaint.  Alternatively, counsel for Mr. Kvint requested that any dismissal of the action be with prejudice to KBC only.  On June 14, 2016, Chemed filed a reply letter with the Court, reserving its rights to oppose any motion filed by Mr. Kvint and, if warranted, to oppose any other actions taken by Mr. Kvint to proceed with the action (including by filing an untimely amended Complaint).  On June 21, 2016, the Court entered an Oral Order providing Mr. Kvint until June 30, 2016 to file a Motion to Substitute and Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint.  On that date, Mr. Kvint filed, under seal, a Motion to Substitute Plaintiff and File Amended Complaint, and attached a Proposed Amended Complaint.    Mr. Kvint’s motion was fully briefed by the parties.  On April 25, 2017, Magistrate Judge Burke issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the Court permit Mr. Kvint to intervene as Lead Plaintiff and grant leave to amend the complaint to replead the duty of loyalty claim only.  On May 16, 2017, Chief Judge Stark signed an Order adopting that Report and Recommendation.  Plaintiff Kvint filed a Corrected Amended Complaint on May 30, 2017.  On September 13, 2017, the Court entered an order dismissing with prejudice the claims against defendants Timothy S, O’Toole and Joel F. Gemunder and permitting Defendants to file a Motion to Dismiss the Corrected Amended Complaint on or before September 29, 2017, with Plaintiff’s Answering to be filed on or before December 1, 2017, and Defendants’ Reply Brief to be filed on or before December 29, 2017.  Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss timely. As the Company has previously disclosed, the legal fees and costs associated with defending against this lawsuit are presently being paid by insurance. For additional procedural history of this litigation, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings.
-18-

Jordan Seper, (“Seper”) a Registered Nurse at VITAS' Inland Empire program from May 12, 2014 to March 21, 2015, filed a lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court on September 26, 2016.  She alleged VITAS Healthcare Corp of CA (“VITAS CA”) (1) failed to provide minimum wage for all hours worked; (2) failed to provide overtime for all hours worked; (3) failed to provide a second meal period; (4) failed to provide rest breaks; (5) failed to indemnify for necessary expenditures; (6) failed to timely pay wages due at time of separation; and (7) engaged in unfair business practices.  Seper seeks a state-widehour class action of current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITASclaims raised in California within the four years preceding the filing of the lawsuit.  She seeks court determination that this action may be maintained as a class action for the entire California class and subclasses, designation as class representative, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, damages (including wages for regular or overtime hours allegedly worked but not paid, premium payments for missed meal or rest periods, and unreimbursed expenses), all applicable penalties associated with each claim, pre and post-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees and costs.  Seper served VITAS CA with the lawsuit,  separate cases: (1) Jordan A. Seper on behalf of herself and others similarly situated v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corp of CA, a business entity unknown; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; Los Angeles Superior Court Case Number BC 642857 on October 13, 2016.

On November 14, 2016, the Parties filed a Stipulation to transfer the venue of the lawsuit from San Francisco to Los Angeles.  The Los Angeles Superior Court Complex Division accepted transfer of the case on December 6, 2016 and stayed the case.  On December 16, 2016, VITAS CA filed its Answer and served written discovery on Seper.

(“Seper”); (2) Jiwan Chhina ("Chhina")v. VITAS Health Services of California, Inc., hired bya California corporation; VITAS asHealthcare Corporation of California, a Home Health Aide on February 5, 2002, is currentlyDelaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Licensed Vocational Nurse for VITAS' San Diego program.  On September 27, 2016, Chhina filed a lawsuit inDelaware corporation dba VITAS Healthcare Inc.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; San Diego Superior Court allegingCase Number 37-2015-00033978-CU-OE-CTL (“Chhina”) (which was subsequently merged with Seper); (3) Chere Phillips and Lady Moore v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2017-0021-2755 (“Phillips and Moore”); and (4) Williams v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG 17853886 (“Williams’). These actions were brought by both current and former employees including a registered nurse, a licensed vocational nurse (LVN), home health aides and a social worker. Each action stated multiple claims generally including (1) failure to pay minimum wage for all hours worked; (2) failure to provide overtime for all hours worked; (3) failure to pay wages for all hours at the regular rate; (4) failure to provide meal periods; (5) failure to provide rest breaks; (6) failure to provide complete and accurate wage statements; (7) failure to pay for all reimbursement expenses; (8) unfair business practices; and (9) violation of the California Private Attorneys General Act. Chhina seeksThe cases generally asserted claims on behalf of classes defined to pursue these claims in the form of a state-wide class action ofinclude all current and former non-exempt employees employed with VITAS in California within the four years preceding the filing of each lawsuit. For additional procedural history of these cases, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings.

The Seper and Chhina cases were consolidated in Los Angeles County Superior Court; Chhina was dismissed as a separate action and joined with Seper in the lawsuit.  He seeksfiling of amended complaint on August 28, 2018, in which both Chhina and Seper were identified as named plaintiffs. Discovery in the remaining cases was stayed as to class claims and each court determination that this action may be maintainedwas advised of the pendency of the consolidated Seper/Chhina action. The parties engaged in a mediation process beginning in October 2018 and concluded with an agreement in March 2019. The settlement amount of $5.75 million plus employment taxes. was recorded in the first quarter of 2019. As of December 31, 2019, $6.0 million was accrued in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. The definition of the class to participate in the settlement is intended to cover claims raised in the consolidated Seper/Chhina matter, claims raised in Phillips and Moore, as well as any class claims in Williams. On January 28, 2020, the court granted preliminary approval of the settlement. A notice of the proposed settlement has been sent to the members of the class by the class claims administrator. The court has set the date for the final approval of the settlement hearing for May 21, 2020.

-25-


Alfred Lax (“Lax”), a current employee of Roto-Rooter Services Company (“RRSC”), was hired in RRSC’s Menlo Park branch in 2007. On November 30, 2018, Lax filed a class action for the entire California class and subclasses, designation as class representative, declaratory relief, injunctive relief, damages (including wages for regular or overtime hours allegedly worked but not paid, premium payments for missed meal or rest periods, and unreimbursed expenses), all applicable penalties associated with each claim, pre-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees and costs.  Chhina served VITAS CA with the lawsuit Jiwann Chhina v. VITAS Health Services of California, Inc., a California corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation; VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, a Delaware corporation dba VITAS Healthcare, Inc.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive; San Diego Superior Court Case Number 37-2015-00033978-CU-OE-CTL on November 3, 2016.  On December 1, 2016, VITAS CA filed its Answer and served written discovery on Chhina.


On May 19, 2017, Chere Phillips (a Home Health Aide in Sacramento) and Lady Moore (a former Social Worker in Sacramento) filed a lawsuit against VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California in SacramentoSanta Clara County Superior Court alleging claims for (1) failure to pay all wages due;provide or compensate for required rest breaks; (2) failure to authorize and permit rest periods;properly pay for all hours worked; (3) failure to provide off-duty meal periods;accurate wage statements; (4) failure to furnish accurate wage statements;reimburse for work-related expenses; and (5) unreimbursedunfair business expenses; (6) waiting time penalties; (7) violations of unfair competition law; and (8) violation of the Private Attorney General Act.  The case is captioned: Chere Phillips and Lady Moore v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2017-0021-2755.  Plaintiffs sought to pursuepractices. Lax stated these claims in the formas a representative of a state-wide class action of current and former non-exempt employeesdefined as all service technicians employed with VITAS CAby RRSC in California withinduring the four years preceding the filing of the lawsuit.  Plaintiffs served VITAS withcomplaint. He seeks a determination that the action may proceed and be maintained as a class action and for compensatory and statutory damages (premium payments for missed rest periods, uncompensated rest periods, wages for time allegedly not paid such as travel time, repair time, and vehicle maintenance time, and unreimbursed expenses), penalties and restitutions, pre- and post-judgement interest and attorneys’ fees and costs. The lawsuit is, Alfred Lax on June 5, 2017. VITAS CA timely answered the Complaint generally denying the Plaintiffs’ allegations.  The Court has stayedbehalf of himself and all class discovery in this case pending the resolution of the November 10, 2017 in the Seperothers similarly situated v. Roto-Rooter Services Company, and Chhina cases.

There are currently three other lawsuits against VITAS pending in the superior courts of other California counties that contain claims and class periods that substantially overlap with Phillips’ and Moore’s claims.  These are Seper, v. VITAS Healthcare Corp of California et al., filed on September 26, 2016 in Los AngelesDoes 1 through 50 inclusive; Santa Clara County Superior Court BC 642857; Chhina v. VITAS Health Service, Inc. et al., filed on September 27, 2016 in San Diego County Superior Court, 34-2015-00033998 CU_OE_CTL; both described above and Williams v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, filed on May 22, 2017 in Alameda County Superior Court, RG 17853886.

Jazzina Williams’ (a Home Health Aide in Sacramento) lawsuit alleges claims for (1) failure to pay all wages due; (2) failure to authorize and permit rest periods; (3) failure to provide off-duty meal periods; (4) failure to furnish accurate wage statements; (5) unreimbursed business expenses; (6) waiting time penalties; and (7) violations of the Private Attorney General Act.  Williams seeks to pursue these claims in the form of a state-wide class action of current and former non-exempt employees.  Plaintiff served VITAS with the lawsuit on May 31, 2017.  VITAS timely answered the Complaint generally denying Plaintiff’s allegations.  Williams is pursuing discovery of her individual claims and has agreed to a stay of class discovery pending outcome of a November 10, 2017 mediation of the Seper and Chhina cases.  Defendant filed and served each of Plaintiffs Williams, Phillips, and Moore with a Notice of Related Cases on July 19, 2017.  Defendant understands that the Seper and Chhina cases will be effectively consolidated in Los Angeles County Superior court: Chhina will be dismissed as a separate action and joined with Seper through the filing of an amended complaint in Seper in which Chhina is also identified as a named plaintiff.
-19-

Case Number 18CV338652.

The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the probability of loss or range of loss for any of these lawsuits at this time.


time, with the exception of Seper/Chhina, Phillips and Moore and the class claims in Williams.

The Company intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in each of the above lawsuits.Lax lawsuit. Regardless of the outcome of any of the preceding matters, dealing with the various regulatory agencies and opposing parties can adversely affect us through defense costs, potential payments, withholding of governmental funding, diversion of management time, and related publicity. Although the Company intends to defend them vigorously, there can be no assurance that those suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.


Results of Operations

Three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 versus 20162019 - Consolidated Results

Our service revenues and sales for the thirdfirst quarter of 20172020 increased 6.3%11.6% versus services and sales revenues for the thirdfirst quarter of 2016.2019. Of this increase, a $6.1$31.1 million increase was attributable to VITAS and $18.8$22.6 million increase was attributable to Roto-Rooter. The following chart shows the components of those changesrevenue by operating segment (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31,

2020

2019

VITAS

Routine homecare

$

271,762

$

258,847

Continuous care

40,555

32,244

General inpatient

32,482

22,570

Other

3,147

2,010

Medicare cap adjustment

(2,500)

(3,400)

Room and board - net

(3,381)

(2,542)

Implicit price concessions

(4,149)

(2,948)

Roto-Rooter

Drain cleaning - short term core

54,020

44,653

Plumbing - short term core

36,794

32,418

Subtotal

90,814

77,071

Excavation - short term core

43,060

34,538

Water restoration

29,246

29,208

Contractor operations

16,228

14,032

Outside franchisee fees

1,190

1,621

Other - short term core

550

576

Other

3,534

3,008

Implicit price concessions

(6,740)

(4,801)

Total

$

515,798

$

462,034

-26-

  Increase/(Decrease) 
  Amount  Percent 
VITAS      
Routine homecare $11,217   5.0 
Continuous care  (4,025)  (11.9)
General inpatient  (1,334)  (5.6)
Medicare cap  228   100.0 
Roto-Rooter        
Plumbing  7,262   15.2 
Drain cleaning  1,442   4.1 
Water restoration  9,208   77.2 
Contractor operations  632   6.4 
Other  207   4.2 
Total $24,837   6.3 


Days of care at VITAS during the quarter ended March 31 were as follows:

Days of Care

Increase/(Decrease)

2020

2019

Percent

Routine homecare

1,364,746

1,281,899 

6.5

Nursing home

303,374

289,769 

4.7

Respite

6,692

6,301 

6.2

Subtotal routine homecare and respite

1,674,812

1,577,969 

6.1

Continuous care

32,348

29,150 

11.0

General inpatient

41,373

43,923 

(5.8)

Total days of care

1,748,533

1,651,042 

5.9

The revenue increase at VITAS is comprised primarily of the 5.9% increase in VITAS’ revenues for the third quarter of 2017 versus the third quarter of 2016 was comprised of andays-of-care, a geographically weighted average net Medicare reimbursement rate increasingincrease of approximately 1.3%5.0%, a 2.8% increase in days of care offset byand acuity mix shift which negatively impacted revenue 2.2% when compared tothen reduced the prior year period.


Days of care during the quarter ended September 30 were as follows:
 Days of Care Increase/(Decrease)
 2017 2016 Percent
      
Routine homecare 1,458,153  1,407,623  3.6
Continuous care 41,237  46,582  (11.5)
General inpatient 32,567  36,241  (10.1)
Total days of care 1,531,957  1,490,446  2.8

Over 90% of VITAS’ service revenues for the period were from Medicare and Medicaid.

rate increase approximately 0.9%.

The increase in plumbing revenues for the thirdfirst quarter of 20172020 versus 20162019 is attributable to a 14.2%13.1% increase in price and service mix shift as well asand an 0.4% increase in job count. The increase in excavation revenues for the first quarter of 2020 versus 2019 is attributable to a 1.0%5.7% increase in price and service mix shift and a 19.0% increase in job count. Drain cleaning revenues for the thirdfirst quarter of 20172020 versus 20162019 reflect a 6.2%8.5% increase in price and service mix shift offset byand a 2.1% decrease12.5% increase in job count. Water restoration revenue for the thirdfirst quarter of 20172020 versus 2016 increased 77.2% as2019 is attributable to a result of continued expansion of this service offering including a 38.0%4.2% increase in number of jobs performed.job count offset by a 4.1% decrease in price. Contractor operations increased 6.4%15.6% mainly due to their continued expansion into water restoration.

-20-

The consolidated gross margin was 31.0%31.8% in the thirdfirst quarter of 20172020 as compared with 28.3%30.3% in the thirdfirst quarter of 2016.2019. On a segment basis, VITAS’ gross margin was 23.1%23.2% in the thirdfirst quarter of 20172020 as compared with 20.7%21.9%, in the thirdfirst quarter of 2016.  The increase in VITAS gross margin is the result of labor and ancillary cost management.2019 primarily due to increased revenue. The Roto-Rooter segment’s gross margin was 48.7%48.1% for the thirdfirst quarter of 20172020 as compared with 47.8%47.0% in the thirdfirst quarter of 2016.  The increase in Roto-Rooter gross margin is the result mainly of higher revenues, particularly in water restoration, with relatively low increase in branch level fixed costs.


2019 primarily due to increased revenue.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) comprise (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31,

2020

2019

SG&A expenses before long-term incentive compensation and the impact of market value adjustments related to deferred compensation trusts

$

78,334

$

70,203

Impact of market value adjustments related to assets held in deferred compensation trusts

(9,572)

2,338

Long-term incentive compensation

1,821

1,488

Total SG&A expenses

$

70,583

$

74,029


  Three months ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
SG&A expenses before market value adjustments of deferred compensation      
plans, long-term incentive compensation, and OIG investigation expenses $63,463  $56,475 
Impact of market value adjustments related to assets held in deferred        
compensation trusts  1,417   1,656 
Long-term incentive compensation  1,104   643 
Expenses related to OIG investigation  935   599 
Total SG&A expenses $66,919  $59,373 

SG&A expenses before long-term incentive compensation expenses related to OIG investigation and the impact of market value adjustments related to assets held in deferred compensation trusts for the thirdfirst quarter of 20172020 were up 12.4%11.6% when compared to the thirdfirst quarter of 2016.2019. This increase was mainly a result of the increase in variable selling and general administrative expenses caused by increased revenue, particularlyrevenue.

Depreciation for the first quarter of 2020, increased 17.3% when compared to the first quarter of 2019, primarily due to new equipment purchased at Roto-Rooter related to the acquisitions completed in the Roto-Rooter segment, increased advertising expense at Roto-Rooter and normal salary increases in 2017.

Duringsecond half of 2019.

Amortization for the thirdfirst quarter of 2017, a credit2020, increased 377.3% when compared to the first quarter of $371,000 was recorded2019 due to the recoveryamortization of previously recognized expensesreacquired franchise rights related to acquisitions completed in the closuresecond half of the programs in one state at Vitas.  There were no other2019.

Other operating expenses decreased $6.1 million from the first quarter of 2019 primarily as a result of a $6.0 million litigation settlement at VITAS recorded in the thirdfirst quarter of 2016.2019.


-27-


Other income/(expense) -/income – net comprise (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31,

2020

2019

Market value adjustment on assets held in

deferred compensation trust

$

(9,572)

$

2,338 

Interest income

106 

101 

Total other (expense)/income - net

$

(9,466)

$

2,439 

  Three months ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
Market value adjustment on assets held in      
deferred compensation trusts $1,417  $1,656 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment  (146)  (134)
Interest income  51   119 
Other  1   (1)
Total other income/(expense) - net $1,323  $1,640 

Our effective income tax rate was 34.7% in the third quarter of 2017 compared to 38.3% during the third quarter of 2016.  The change in the effective income tax ratereconciliation is a result of the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 – Compensation – Stock Compensation in 2017 which requires that the excess tax benefits from stock based compensation now be recorded in the income tax provision on the statements of income.  Excluding the adoption of the ASU, our effective income tax rate is 38.0%.as follows:

Three months ended March 31,

2020

2019

Income tax provision calculated at the statutory federal rate

$

14,474

$

10,665

Stock compensation tax benefits

(4,553)

(6,732)

State and local income taxes

2,377

1,128

Other--net

733

1,059

Income tax provision

$

13,031

$

6,120

Effective tax rate

18.9

%

12.1

%


-21-

Net income for both periods included the following after-tax items/adjustments that (reduced) or increased after-tax earnings (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31,

2020

2019

VITAS

Direct costs related to COVID-19

$

(726)

$

-

Medicare cap sequestration adjustment

(503)

(387)

Litigation settlement

-

(4,476)

Non cash ASC 842 expenses

-

(489)

Roto-Rooter

Amortization of reacquired franchise agreements

(1,729)

(324)

Direct costs related to COVID-19

(633)

-

Non cash ASC 842 expenses

-

(40)

Corporate

Excess tax benefits on stock compensation

4,553

6,732

Stock option expense

(4,190)

(3,327)

Long-term incentive compensation

(1,596)

(1,230)

Non cash ASC 842 expenses

-

124

Acquisition expense

-

(91)

Total

$

(4,824)

$

(3,508)

  Three months ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
VITAS      
Expenses related to OIG investigation $(578) $(370)
Program closure income  223   - 
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment  -   (141)
Corporate        
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation  1,783   - 
Stock option expense  (1,064)  (897)
Long-term incentive compensation  (699)  (406)
Total $(335) $(1,814)

Three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 versus 20162019 - Segment Results


The change in net

Net income/(loss) for the thirdfirst quarter of 20172020 versus the thirdfirst quarter of 2016 is due to2019 by segment (in thousands):

Three months ended March 31,

2020

2019

VITAS

$

41,279

$

29,288

Roto-Rooter

24,322

22,986

Corporate

(9,710)

(7,607)

$

55,891

$

44,667


  Increase/(Decrease) 
  Amount  Percent 
VITAS $5,551   26.6 
Roto-Rooter  3,179   24.7 
Corporate  (122)  (1.8)
  8,608   32.1 

VITAS’ after-tax earnings were positively impacted in 20172020 compared to 2016 by a $6.1 million increase in2019 due to higher revenue and a $2.3 million decrease in cost of services providedimproved labor management and goods sold.ancillary costs. After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue at VITAS in the thirdfirst quarter of 2017 were 9.2%, an increase of 1.8% over2020 was 12.2% as compared to 9.5% in the thirdfirst quarter of 2016.2019.


-28-


Roto-Rooter’s net income was positively impacted in 20172020 compared to 20162019 primarily by a $9.2 millionhigher revenue increase in Roto-Rooter’s water restoration line of business and a $7.3 million increase in plumbing revenue.offset by increased amortization expense. After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue at Roto-Rooter in the thirdfirst quarter of 20172020 was 12.5%13.7% as compared to 11.7%14.8% in the thirdfirst quarter of 2016.


Results of Operations
Nine months ended September 30, 2017 versus 2016 - Consolidated Results
Our service revenues and sales2019.

After-tax Corporate expenses for the first nine months of 20172020 increased 5.5% versus services and sales revenues for the first nine months of 2016.  Of this increase, a $16.9 million increase was attributable to VITAS and $48.1 million increase was attributable to Roto-Rooter.  The following chart shows the components of those changes (in thousands):


  Increase/(Decrease) 
  Amount  Percent 
VITAS      
Routine homecare $33,882   5.1 
Continuous care  (11,600)  (10.9)
General inpatient  (5,417)  (7.3)
Medicare cap  (19)  (8.3)
Roto-Rooter        
Plumbing  16,852   11.6 
Drain cleaning  3,454   3.2 
Water restoration  23,597   64.6 
Contractor operations  3,180   10.8 
Other  1,033   6.9 
Total $64,962   5.5 
-22-

The increase in VITAS’ revenues for the first nine months of 2017 versus the first nine months of 2016 was comprised of an average net Medicare reimbursement rate increasing approximately 1.3%, a 2.7% increase in days of care offset by acuity mix shift which negatively impacted revenue27.6% when compared to the prior year period.

Days of care during the nine months ended September 30 were as follows:
 Days of Care Increase/(Decrease)
 2017 2016 Percent
      
Routine homecare 4,256,541  4,109,775  3.6
Continuous care 129,762  145,327  (10.7)
General inpatient 97,803  111,323  (12.1)
Total days of care 4,484,106  4,366,425  2.7

Over 90% of VITAS’ service revenues for the period were from Medicare and Medicaid.

The increase in plumbing revenues for the first nine months of 2017 versus 2016 is attributable primarily2019 due mainly to service mix shift as well as a 0.6% increase in job count.  Drain cleaning revenues for the first nine months of 2017 versus 2016 reflect a 5.3% increase in price and service mix shift offset by a 2.1%$2.2 million decrease in job count.  Water restoration for the first nine months of 2017 versus 2016 increased 64.6% as a result of continued expansion of this service offering including a 32.6% increase in jobs performed.  Contractor operations increased 10.8% mainly due to their expansion into water restoration.

The consolidated gross margin was 30.6% in the first nine months of 2017 as compared with 28.7% in the first nine months of 2016.  On a segment basis, VITAS’ gross margin was 22.5% in the first nine months of 2017 as compared with 21.1%, in the first nine months of 2016.  The increase in VITAS’ gross margin is the result of mix shift to higher margin care, labor and ancillary cost management.  The Roto-Rooter segment’s gross margin was 48.9% for the first nine months of 2017 compared with 48.0% in the first nine months of 2016.  The increase in the Roto-Rooter gross margin is the result mainly of higher revenues, particularly in water restoration, with relatively low increase in branch level fixed costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) comprise (in thousands):

  Nine months ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
SG&A expenses before market value adjustments of deferred compensation      
plans, long-term incentive compensation, and OIG investigation expenses $191,213  $174,183 
Impact of market value adjustments related to assets held in deferred        
compensation trusts  5,619   1,857 
Expenses related to OIG investigation  5,178   4,105 
Long-term incentive compensation  3,021   901 
Total SG&A expenses $205,031  $181,046 

SG&A expenses before long-term incentive compensation, expenses related to OIG investigation and the impact of market value adjustments related to assets held in deferred compensation trusts for the first nine months of 2017 were up 9.8% when compared to the first nine months of 2016. This increase was mainly a result of the increase in variable expenses caused by increased revenue, particularly in the in the Roto-Rooter segment, increased advertising expense at Roto-Rooter and normal salary increases in 2017.
Other operating expenses were $91.1 million during the first nine months of 2017 related to a $90.0 million potential litigation settlement and $1.1 million related to the closure of the programs in one state at Vitas.  During the first nine months of 2016, the Company recorded $4.5 million related to early retirement expenses.

-23-

Other income - net comprise (in thousands):

  Nine months ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
Market value adjustment on assets held in      
deferred compensation trusts $5,619  $1,857 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment  (481)  (224)
Interest income  297   301 
Other  4   (1)
Total other income - net $5,439  $1,933 

Our effective income tax rate was 25.8% in the first nine months of 2017 compared to 38.6% during the first nine months of 2016.  The change in the effective income tax rate is due to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09 – Compensation – Stock Compensation which requires that the excess tax benefits fromon stock based compensation now be recorded in the income tax provision on the statements of income.  Excluding the impact of the ASU, our effective income tax rate for the first nine months of 2017 was 39.6%.

Net income for both periods included the following after-tax items/adjustments that (reduced) or increased after-tax earnings (in thousands):
  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016 
VITAS      
Potential litigation settlement $(55,800) $- 
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (3,198)  (2,535)
Program closure expenses  (675)  - 
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment  (65)  (141)
Early retirement expenses  -   (2,840)
Roto-Rooter        
Expenses related to litigation settlements  (129)  (27)
Corporate        
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation  8,121   - 
Stock option expense  (4,892)  (3,958)
Long-term incentive compensation  (1,911)  (570)
Total $(58,549) $(10,071)

Nine months ended September 30, 2017 versus 2016 - Segment Results

The change in net income/(loss) for the first nine months of 2017 versus the first nine months of 2016 is due to (in thousands):
  Increase/(Decrease) 
  Amount  Percent 
VITAS $(43,741)  (74.7)
Roto-Rooter  8,500   21.7 
Corporate  2,312   10.9 
  (32,929)  (43.0)

VITAS’ 2017 after-tax earnings were impacted in 2017 when compared to 2016 by a $55.8 million (after-tax) potential ligation settlement offset by a $16.8 million increase in revenue and a $1.2 million decrease in cost of services provided and goods sold.
compensation.


-24-

-29-



Roto-Rooter’s net income was positively impacted in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily by a $23.6 million revenue increase in Roto-Rooter’s water restoration line of business, a $16.9 million increase in plumbing revenue and a $7.7 million increase in all other revenue types.  After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue at Roto-Rooter in 2017 were 12.5% as compared to 11.7% in 2016.

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2020

(in thousands)(unaudited)

Chemed

VITAS

Roto-Rooter

Corporate

Consolidated

2020 (a)

                         

                         

                         

                         

Service revenues and sales

$

337,916 

$

177,882 

$

-

$

515,798 

Cost of services provided and goods sold

259,429 

92,316 

-

351,745 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

22,269 

46,282 

2,032 

70,583 

Depreciation

5,474 

5,878 

36 

11,388 

Amortization

18 

2,459 

-

2,477 

Other operating expenses

114 

128 

-

242 

Total costs and expenses

287,304 

147,063 

2,068 

436,435 

Income/(loss) from operations

50,612 

30,819 

(2,068)

79,363 

Interest expense

(45)

(102)

(828)

(975)

Intercompany interest income/(expense)

4,386 

1,349 

(5,735)

-

Other income—net

65 

40 

(9,571)

(9,466)

Income/(expense) before income taxes

55,018 

32,106 

(18,202)

68,922 

Income taxes

(13,739)

(7,784)

8,492 

(13,031)

Net income/(loss)

$

41,279 

$

24,322 

$

(9,710)

$

55,891 

(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):

Chemed

VITAS

Roto-Rooter

Corporate

Consolidated

Pretax benefit/(cost):

Stock option expense

$

-

$

-

$

(5,045)

$

(5,045)

Amortization of reacquired franchise agreements

-

(2,352)

-

(2,352)

Direct costs related to COVID-19

(973)

(861)

-

(1,834)

Long-term incentive compensation

-

-

(1,821)

(1,821)

Medicare cap sequestration

(675)

-

-

(675)

Total

$

(1,648)

$

(3,213)

$

(6,866)

$

(11,727)

Chemed

VITAS

Roto-Rooter

Corporate

Consolidated

After-tax benefit/(cost):

Stock option expense

$

-

$

-

$

(4,190)

$

(4,190)

Amortization of reacquired franchise agreements

-

(1,729)

-

(1,729)

Long-term incentive compensation

-

-

(1,596)

(1,596)

Direct costs related to COVID-19

(726)

(633)

-

(1,359)

Medicare cap sequestration

(503)

-

-

(503)

Excess tax benefits on stock compensation

-

-

4,553 

4,553 

Total

$

(1,229)

$

(2,362)

$

(1,233)

$

(4,824)


The improvement at Corporate is due mainly to the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 which positively impacted the Company’s tax provision by approximately $8.1 million which is partially offset by higher stock based compensation expenses.


-25-

-30-



CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF INCOME

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2019

(in thousands)(unaudited)

Chemed

VITAS

Roto-Rooter

Corporate

Consolidated

2019 (a)

                         

                         

                         

                         

Service revenues and sales

$

306,781 

$

155,253 

$

-

$

462,034 

Cost of services provided and goods sold

239,743 

82,208 

-

321,951 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

21,536 

39,601 

12,892 

74,029 

Depreciation

4,708 

4,963 

39 

9,710 

Amortization

18 

501 

-

519 

Other operating expenses

6,354 

(1)

-

6,353 

Total costs and expenses

272,359 

127,272 

12,931 

412,562 

Income/(loss) from operations

34,422 

27,981 

(12,931)

49,472 

Interest expense

(47)

(95)

(982)

(1,124)

Intercompany interest income/(expense)

4,394 

2,195 

(6,589)

-

Other income—net

88 

14 

2,337 

2,439 

Income/(expense) before income taxes

38,857 

30,095 

(18,165)

50,787 

Income taxes

(9,569)

(7,109)

10,558 

(6,120)

Net income/(loss)

$

29,288 

$

22,986 

$

(7,607)

$

44,667 

(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):

Chemed

VITAS

Roto-Rooter

Corporate

Consolidated

Pretax benefit/(cost):

Litigation settlement

$

(6,000)

$

-

$

-

$

(6,000)

Stock option expense

-

-

(4,089)

(4,089)

Long-term incentive compensation

-

-

(1,488)

(1,488)

Non cash ASC 842 (expenses)/benefit

(656)

(55)

163 

(548)

Medicare cap sequestration adjustment

(515)

-

-

(515)

Acquisition expenses

-

(441)

-

(441)

Amortization of reacquired franchise agreements

-

-

(120)

(120)

Total

$

(7,171)

$

(496)

$

(5,534)

$

(13,201)

Chemed

VITAS

Roto-Rooter

Corporate

Consolidated

After-tax benefit/(cost):

Litigation settlement

$

(4,476)

$

-

$

-

$

(4,476)

Stock option expense

-

-

(3,327)

(3,327)

Long-term incentive compensation

-

-

(1,230)

(1,230)

Non cash ASC 842 (expenses)/benefit

(489)

(40)

124 

(405)

Medicare cap sequestration adjustment

(387)

-

-

(387)

Acquisition expenses

-

(324)

-

(324)

Amortization of reacquired franchise agreements

-

-

(91)

(91)

Excess tax benefits on stock compensation

-

6,732 

6,732 

Total

$

(5,352)

$

(364)

$

2,208 

$

(3,508)

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME 
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 
(in thousands)(unaudited) 
           
         Chemed 
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
2017 (a)            
Service revenues and sales $288,951  $128,493  $-  $417,444 
Cost of services provided and goods sold  222,119   65,928   -   288,047 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  23,783   33,694   9,442   66,919 
Depreciation  4,529   4,268   22   8,819 
Amortization  -   33   -   33 
Other operating expenses  (371)  -   -   (371)
Total costs and expenses  250,060   103,923   9,464   363,447 
Income/(loss) from operations  38,891   24,570   (9,464)  53,997 
Interest expense  (53)  (73)  (922)  (1,048)
Intercompany interest income/(expense)  2,950   1,378   (4,328)  - 
Other income/(expense)—net  (86)  (8)  1,417   1,323 
Income/(expense) before income taxes  41,702   25,867   (13,297)  54,272 
Income taxes  (15,248)  (9,833)  6,246   (18,835)
Net income/(loss) $26,454  $16,034  $(7,051) $35,437 
                 
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):                
              Chemed 
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
Pretax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(1,683) $(1,683)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (1,104)  (1,104)
Program closure expenses  371   -   -   371 
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (935)  -   -   (935)
Total $(564) $-  $(2,787) $(3,351)
                 
              Chemed 
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
After-tax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(1,064) $(1,064)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (699)  (699)
Program closure expenses  223   -   -   223 
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (578)  -   -   (578)
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation  -   -   1,783   1,783 
Total $(355) $-  $20  $(335)


-26-

-31-




Unaudited Consolidating Summary and Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA

Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies

(in thousands)

Chemed

For the three months ended March 31, 2020

VITAS

Roto-Rooter

Corporate

Consolidated

                         

                         

                         

                         

Net income/(loss)

$

41,279 

$

24,322 

$

(9,710)

$

55,891

Add/(deduct):

Interest expense

45 

102 

828 

975 

Income taxes

13,739 

7,784 

(8,492)

13,031

Depreciation

5,474 

5,878 

36 

11,388 

Amortization

18 

2,459 

-

2,477 

EBITDA

60,555 

40,545 

(17,338)

83,762 

Add/(deduct):

Intercompany interest expense/(income)

(4,386)

(1,349)

5,735 

-

Interest income

(68)

(40)

-

(108)

Stock option expense

-

-

5,045 

5,045 

Direct costs related to COVID-19

973 

861 

-

1,834 

Long-term incentive compensation

-

-

1,821 

1,821 

Medicare cap sequestration adjustment

675 

-

-

675 

Adjusted EBITDA

$

57,749 

$

40,017 

$

(4,737)

$

93,029 

Chemed

For the three months ended March 31, 2019

VITAS

Roto-Rooter

Corporate

Consolidated

Net income/(loss)

$

29,288 

$

22,986 

$

(7,607)

$

44,667 

Add/(deduct):

Interest expense

47 

95 

982 

1,124 

Income taxes

9,569 

7,109 

(10,558)

6,120 

Depreciation

4,708 

4,963 

39 

9,710 

Amortization

18 

501 

-

519 

EBITDA

43,630 

35,654 

(17,144)

62,140 

Add/(deduct):

Intercompany interest expense/(income)

(4,394)

(2,195)

6,589 

-

Interest income

(88)

(14)

-

(102)

Litigation settlement

6,000 

-

-

6,000 

Non cash ASC 842 expenses/(benefit)

656 

55 

(163)

548 

Medicare cap sequestration adjustment

515 

-

-

515 

Acquisition expense

-

-

120 

120 

Stock option expense

-

-

4,089 

4,089 

Long-term incentive compensation

-

-

1,488 

1,488 

Adjusted EBITDA

$

46,319 

$

33,500 

$

(5,021)

$

74,798 

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME 
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 
(in thousands)(unaudited) 
           
         Chemed 
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
2016 (a)            
Service revenues and sales $282,865  $109,742  $-  $392,607 
Cost of services provided and goods sold  224,410   57,248   -   281,658 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  21,775   28,635   8,963   59,373 
Depreciation  4,751   3,731   132   8,614 
Amortization  14   77   -   91 
Total costs and expenses  250,950   89,691   9,095   349,736 
Income/(loss) from operations  31,915   20,051   (9,095)  42,871 
Interest expense  (59)  (78)  (881)  (1,018)
Intercompany interest income/(expense)  1,810   800   (2,610)  - 
Other income/(expense)—net  (1)  (14)  1,655   1,640 
Income/(expense) before income taxes  33,665   20,759   (10,931)  43,493 
Income taxes  (12,762)  (7,904)  4,002   (16,664)
Net income/(loss) $20,903  $12,855  $(6,929) $26,829 
                 
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):                
              Chemed 
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
Pretax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(1,419) $(1,419)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (643)  (643)
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment  (228)  -   -   (228)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (599)  -   -   (599)
Total $(827) $-  $(2,062) $(2,889)
                 
              Chemed 
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
After-tax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(897) $(897)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (406)  (406)
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment  (141)  -   -   (141)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (370)  -   -   (370)
Total $(511) $-  $(1,303) $(1,814)


-27-

-32-



RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME

(in thousands, except per share data)(unaudited)

Three Months Ended March 31,

2020

2019

Net income as reported

$

55,891 

$

44,667 

Add/(deduct) pre-tax cost of:

Stock option expense

5,045 

4,089 

Amortization of reacquired franchise agreements

2,352 

441 

Direct costs related to COVID-19

1,834 

-

Long-term incentive compensation

1,821 

1,488 

Medicare cap sequestration adjustment

675 

515 

Litigation settlement

-

6,000 

Acquisition expense

-

120 

Non cash ASC 842 expense

-

548 

Add/(deduct) tax impacts:

Tax impact of the above pre-tax adjustments (1)

(2,350)

(2,961)

Excess tax benefits on stock compensation

(4,553)

(6,732)

Adjusted net income

$

60,715 

$

48,175

Diluted Earnings Per Share As Reported

Net income

$

3.38 

$

2.70 

Average number of shares outstanding

16,516 

16,525 

Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share

Adjusted net income

$

3.68 

$

2.92

Adjusted average number of shares outstanding

16,516 

16,525 

(1) The tax impact of pre-tax adjustments was calculated using the effective tax rate of the operating unit for which each adjustment is associated.

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME 
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 
(in thousands)(unaudited) 
           
         Chemed 
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
2017 (a)            
Service revenues and sales $855,977  $382,390  $-  $1,238,367 
Cost of services provided and goods sold  663,565   195,474   -   859,039 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  72,608   100,917   31,506   205,031 
Depreciation  14,048   12,322   175   26,545 
Amortization  14   97   -   111 
Other operating expenses  91,138   -   -   91,138 
Total costs and expenses  841,373   308,810   31,681   1,181,864 
Income/(loss) from operations  14,604   73,580   (31,681)  56,503 
Interest expense  (161)  (259)  (2,744)  (3,164)
Intercompany interest income/(expense)  8,478   4,035   (12,513)  - 
Other income/(expense)—net  (95)  (85)  5,619   5,439 
Income/(expense) before income taxes  22,826   77,271   (41,319)  58,778 
Income taxes  (8,029)  (29,555)  22,431   (15,153)
Net income/(loss) $14,797  $47,716  $(18,888) $43,625 
                 
                 
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):         
              Chemed 
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
Pretax benefit/(cost):                
Potential litigation settlement $(90,000) $-  $-  $(90,000)
Medicare cap sequestration adjustments  (105)  -   -   (105)
Stock option expense  -   -   (7,738)  (7,738)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (3,021)  (3,021)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   (213)  -   (213)
Program closure expenses  (1,138)  -   -   (1,138)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (5,178)  -   -   (5,178)
Total $(96,421) $(213) $(10,759) $(107,393)
                 
              Chemed 
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
After-tax benefit/(cost):                
Potential litigation settlement $(55,800) $-  $-  $(55,800)
Medicare cap sequestration adjustments  (65)  -   -   (65)
Stock option expense  -   -   (4,892)  (4,892)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (1,911)  (1,911)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   (129)  -   (129)
Program closure expenses  (675)  -   -   (675)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (3,198)  -   -   (3,198)
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation  -   -   8,121   8,121 
Total $(59,738) $(129) $1,318  $(58,549)

-28-

-33-




CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

OPERATING STATISTICS FOR VITAS SEGMENT

(unaudited)

Three Months Ended March 31,

OPERATING STATISTICS

2020

2019

Net revenue ($000)

Homecare

$

271,762

$

258,847

Inpatient

32,482

22,570

Continuous care

40,555

32,244

Other

3,147

2,010

Subtotal

$

347,946

$

315,671

Room and board, net

(3,381)

(2,542)

Contractual allowances

(4,149)

(2,948)

Medicare cap allowance

(2,500)

(3,400)

Total

$

337,916

$

306,781

Net revenue as a percent of total before Medicare cap allowances

Homecare

78.1

%

82.0

%

Inpatient

9.3

7.1

Continuous care

11.7

10.2

Other

0.9

0.7

Subtotal

100.0

100.0

Room and board, net

(1.0)

(0.9)

Contractual allowances

(1.2)

(1.0)

Medicare cap allowance

(0.7)

(0.9)

Total

97.1

%

97.2

%

Days of care

Homecare

1,364,746

1,281,899

Nursing home

303,374

289,769

Respite

6,692

6,301

Subtotal routine homecare and respite

1,674,812

1,577,969

Inpatient

32,348

29,150

Continuous care

41,373

43,923

Total

1,748,533

1,651,042

Number of days in relevant time period

91

90

Average daily census (days)

Homecare

14,997

14,243

Nursing home

3,334

3,220

Respite

74

70

Subtotal routine homecare and respite

18,405

17,533

Inpatient

355

324

Continuous care

455

488

Total

19,215

18,345

Total Admissions

18,603

17,758

Total Discharges

18,196

17,739

Average length of stay (days)

90.7

91.3

Median length of stay (days)

14.0

15.0

ADC by major diagnosis

Cerebro

35.9

%

35.6

%

Neurological

21.4

19.9

Cancer

12.7

13.1

Cardio

15.9

16.9

Respiratory

8.3

8.2

Other

5.8

6.3

Total

100.0

%

100.0

%

Admissions by major diagnosis

Cerebro

21.1

20.7

%

Neurological

12.5

12.8

Cancer

28.3

28.0

Cardio

15.1

16.3

Respiratory

12.2

12.0

Other

10.8

10.2

Total

100.0

%

100.0

%

Estimated uncollectible accounts as a percent of revenues

1.2

%

1.0

%

Accounts receivable --

Days of revenue outstanding- excluding unapplied Medicare payments

33.9

34.9

Days of revenue outstanding- including unapplied Medicare payments

26.1

23.3

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME 
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 
(in thousands)(unaudited) 
           
         Chemed 
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
2016 (a)            
Service revenues and sales $839,131  $334,274  $-  $1,173,405 
Cost of services provided and goods sold  662,371   173,977   -   836,348 
Selling, general and administrative expenses  69,197   87,890   23,959   181,046 
Depreciation  14,346   10,860   413   25,619 
Amortization  41   233   -   274 
Other operating expenses  4,491   -   -   4,491 
Total costs and expenses  750,446   272,960   24,372   1,047,778 
Income/(loss) from operations  88,685   61,314   (24,372)  125,627 
Interest expense  (176)  (264)  (2,391)  (2,831)
Intercompany interest income/(expense)  5,840   2,614   (8,454)  - 
Other income/(expense)—net  76   (2)  1,859   1,933 
Income/(expense) before income taxes  94,425   63,662   (33,358)  124,729 
Income taxes  (35,887)  (24,446)  12,158   (48,175)
Net income/(loss) $58,538  $39,216  $(21,200) $76,554 
                 
                 
(a) The following amounts are included in net income (in thousands):         
              Chemed 
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
Pretax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(6,259) $(6,259)
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment  (228)  -   -   (228)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (901)  (901)
Early retirement expenses  (4,491)  -   -   (4,491)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   (44)  -   (44)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (4,105)  -   -   (4,105)
Total $(8,824) $(44) $(7,160) $(16,028)
                 
              Chemed 
  VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
After-tax benefit/(cost):                
Stock option expense $-  $-  $(3,958) $(3,958)
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment  (141)  -   -   (141)
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   (570)  (570)
Early retirement expenses  (2,840)  -   -   (2,840)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   (27)  -   (27)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  (2,535)  -   -   (2,535)
Total $(5,516) $(27) $(4,528) $(10,071)


-29-

-34-




Unaudited Consolidating Summary and Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA 
             
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies    
(in thousands)          Chemed 
For the three months ended September 30, 2017 VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
             
Net income/(loss) $26,454  $16,034  $(7,051) $35,437 
Add/(deduct):                
Interest expense  53   73   922   1,048 
Income taxes  15,248   9,833   (6,246)  18,835 
Depreciation  4,529   4,268   22   8,819 
Amortization  -   33   -   33 
EBITDA  46,284   30,241   (12,353)  64,172 
Add/(deduct):                
Intercompany interest expense/(income)  (2,950)  (1,378)  4,328   - 
Interest income  (48)  (4)  -   (52)
Expenses related to OIG investigation  935   -   -   935 
Program closure expenses  (371)  -   -   (371)
Amortization of stock awards  72   67   156   295 
Advertising cost adjustment  -   (162)  -   (162)
Stock option expense  -   -   1,683   1,683 
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   1,104   1,104 
Adjusted EBITDA $43,922  $28,764  $(5,082) $67,604 
                 
              Chemed 
For the three months ended September 30, 2016 VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
                 
Net income/(loss) $20,903  $12,855  $(6,929) $26,829 
Add/(deduct):                
Interest expense  59   78   881   1,018 
Income taxes  12,762   7,904   (4,002)  16,664 
Depreciation  4,751   3,731   132   8,614 
Amortization  14   77   -   91 
EBITDA  38,489   24,645   (9,918)  53,216 
Add/(deduct):                
Intercompany interest expense/(income)  (1,810)  (800)  2,610   - 
Interest income  (108)  (11)  -   (119)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  1,149   -   -   1,149 
Expenses related to OIG investigation  599   -   -   599 
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment  228   -   -   228 
Amortization of stock awards  85   76   279   440 
Advertising cost adjustment  -   (188)  -   (188)
Stock option expense  -   -   1,419   1,419 
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   643   643 
Adjusted EBITDA $38,632  $23,722  $(4,967) $57,387 
-30-


Unaudited Consolidating Summary and Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA 
             
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies    
(in thousands)          Chemed 
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
             
Net income/(loss) $14,797  $47,716  $(18,888) $43,625 
Add/(deduct):                
Interest expense  161   259   2,744   3,164 
Income taxes  8,029   29,555   (22,431)  15,153 
Depreciation  14,048   12,322   175   26,545 
Amortization  14   97   -   111 
EBITDA  37,049   89,949   (38,400)  88,598 
Add/(deduct):                
Intercompany interest expense/(income)  (8,478)  (4,035)  12,513   - 
Interest income  (267)  (29)  -   (296)
Potential litigation settlement  90,000   -   -   90,000 
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment  105   -   -   105 
Program closure expenses  1,138   -   -   1,138 
Expenses related to OIG investigation  5,178   -   -   5,178 
Stock award amortization  220   203   510   933 
Advertising cost adjustment  -   (707)  -   (707)
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   213   -   213 
Stock option expense  -   -   7,738   7,738 
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   3,021   3,021 
Adjusted EBITDA $124,945  $85,594  $(14,618) $195,921 
                 
              Chemed 
For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 VITAS  Roto-Rooter  Corporate  Consolidated 
                 
Net income/(loss) $58,538  $39,216  $(21,200) $76,554 
Add/(deduct):                
Interest expense  176   264   2,391   2,831 
Income taxes  35,887   24,446   (12,158)  48,175 
Depreciation  14,346   10,860   413   25,619 
Amortization  41   233   -   274 
EBITDA  108,988   75,019   (30,554)  153,453 
Add/(deduct):                
Intercompany interest expense/(income)  (5,840)  (2,614)  8,454   - 
Interest income  (256)  (45)  -   (301)
Early retirement expenses  4,491   -   -   4,491 
Expenses related to OIG investigation  4,105   -   -   4,105 
Stock award amortization  302   230   883   1,415 
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment  228   -   -   228 
Expenses related to litigation settlements  1,149   44   -   1,193 
Advertising cost adjustment  -   (1,353)  -   (1,353)
Stock option expense  -   -   6,259   6,259 
Long-term incentive compensation  -   -   901   901 
Adjusted EBITDA $113,167  $71,281  $(14,057) $170,391 
-31-

RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME 
(in thousands, except per share data)(unaudited) 
             
  Three Months Ended September 30,  Nine Months Ended September 30, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Net income/(loss) as reported $35,437  $26,829  $43,625  $76,554 
                 
Add/(deduct) after-tax cost of:                
Excess tax benefits on stock compensation  (1,783)  -   (8,121)  - 
Stock option expense  1,064   897   4,892   3,958 
Long-term incentive compensation  699   406   1,911   570 
Expenses of OIG investigation  578   370   3,198   2,535 
Program closure expenses  (223)  -   675   - 
Medicare cap sequestration adjustment  -   141   65   141 
Potential litigation settlement  -   -   55,800   - 
Expenses related to litigation settlements  -   -   129   27 
Early retirement expenses  -   -   -   2,840 
Adjusted net income $35,772  $28,643  $102,174  $86,625 
                 
Diluted Earnings Per Share As Reported                
Net income/(loss) $2.13  $1.62  $2.60  $4.54 
Average number of shares outstanding  16,676   16,559   16,763   16,851 
                 
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share                
Adjusted net income $2.15  $1.73  $6.10  $5.14 
Adjusted average number of shares outstanding  16,676   16,559   16,763   16,851 
-32-

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES 
OPERATING STATISTICS FOR VITAS SEGMENT 
(unaudited) 
  Three Months Ended September 30,  Nine Months Ended Setpember 30, 
OPERATING STATISTICS 2017  2016  2017  2016 
Net revenue ($000)            
Homecare $236,565  $225,348  $693,359  $659,477 
Inpatient  22,516   23,850   68,439   73,856 
Continuous care  29,870   33,895   94,426   106,026 
Total before Medicare cap allowance $288,951  $283,093  $856,224  $839,359 
Medicare cap allowance  -   (228)  (247)  (228)
Total $288,951  $282,865  $855,977  $839,131 
Net revenue as a percent of total before Medicare cap allowances                
Homecare  81.9%  79.6%  81.0%  78.6%
Inpatient  7.8   8.4   8.0   8.8 
Continuous care  10.3   12.0   11.0   12.6 
Total before Medicare cap allowance  100.0   100.0   100.0   100.0 
Medicare cap allowance  -   (0.1)  -   - 
Total  100.0%  99.9%  100.0%  100.0%
Average daily census (days)                
Homecare  12,596   12,223   12,444   11,972 
Nursing home  3,254   3,077   3,148   3,028 
Routine homecare  15,850   15,300   15,592   15,000 
Inpatient  354   394   358   406 
Continuous care  448   507   475   530 
Total  16,652   16,201   16,425   15,936 
Total Admissions  16,000   16,157   49,874   49,205 
Total Discharges  15,726   15,690   49,074   48,403 
Average length of stay (days)  89.5   87.7   87.9   85.2 
Median length of stay (days)  16.0   16.0   16.0   16.0 
ADC by major diagnosis                
Cerebro  35.6%  32.9%  35.0%  32.2%
Neurological  18.9   20.7   19.4   21.3 
Cardio  16.6   17.1   16.6   17.3 
Cancer  14.4   15.5   14.8   15.3 
Respiratory  7.9   7.8   7.9   7.8 
Other  6.6   6.0   6.3   6.1 
Total  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Admissions by major diagnosis                
Cerebro  22.0   21.2%  21.9%  20.9%
Neurological  10.0   11.0   10.5   11.0 
Cancer  31.5   33.3   30.8   31.9 
Cardio  14.9   14.4   15.1   15.3 
Respiratory  10.6   9.0   10.9   10.1 
Other  11.0   11.1   10.8   10.8 
Total  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Direct patient care margins                
Routine homecare  52.4%  51.4%  52.2%  51.8%
Inpatient  3.4   (2.4)  4.4   2.7 
Continuous care  17.3   12.2   16.9   13.7 
Homecare margin drivers (dollars per patient day)                
Labor costs $56.48  $56.53  $57.20  $56.51 
Combined drug, HME and medical supplies  14.67   16.30   14.77   15.90 
Inpatient margin drivers (dollars per patient day)                
Labor costs $362.48  $360.35  $369.77  $346.61 
Continuous care margin drivers (dollars per patient day)                
Labor costs $579.31  $618.15  $584.82  $609.08 
Bad debt expense as a percent of revenues  1.1%  1.2%  1.1%  1.2%
Accounts receivable -- Days of revenue outstanding- excluding unapplied Medicare payments  34.6   38.4  n.a  n.a. 
Accounts receivable -- Days of revenue outstanding- including unapplied Medicare payments  19.9   20.7  n.a  n.a. 
-33-


Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 Regarding Forward-Looking Information


Certain statements contained in this report are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “believe”, “expect”, “hope”, “anticipate”, “plan” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and involve various known and unknown risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other factors, which could cause Chemed’s actual results to differ from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Variances in any or all of the risks, uncertainties, contingencies, and other factors from our assumptions could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements and trends. In addition, our ability to deal with the unknown outcomes of these events, many of which are beyond our control, may affect the reliability of projections and other financial matters. Investors are cautioned that such forward-looking statements are subject to inherent risk and there are no assurances that the matters contained in such statements will be achieved. Chemed does not undertake and specifically disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of a new information, future events or otherwise.


Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company’s primary market risk exposure relates to interest rate risk exposure through its variable interest line of credit. At September 30, 2017,March 31, 2020, the Company had $82.5$160.0 million of variable rate debt outstanding. For each $10 million dollars borrowed under the credit facility, an increase or decrease of 100 basis points (1% point), increases or decreases the Company’s annual interest expense by $100,000.


The Company continually evaluates this interest rate exposure and periodically weighs the cost versus the benefit of fixing the variable interest rates through a variety of hedging techniques.


Item 4. Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision of our President and Chief Executive Officer and with the participation of the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and the Vice President and Controller, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Vice President and Controller have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


PART II.    OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings


For information regarding the Company’s legal proceedings, see note 10,11, Legal and Regulatory Matters, under Part I, Item I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


Item 1A.    Risk Factors


The recent COVID-19 pandemic could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

We are closely monitoring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on all aspects of our business and geographies, including how it will impact our customers, team members, suppliers, vendors, business partners and distribution channels. The COVID-19 pandemic has created significant volatility, uncertainty and economic disruption, which will adversely affect our business operations and may materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.

For additional information regarding specific risk factors related to the COVID-19 pandemic, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation under Part I., Item 2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. There have been no other material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

-34-

-35-



Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds


Item 2(c).  Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers


The following table shows the activity related to our share repurchase program for the first ninethree months of 2017:2020:

Total Number

Weighted Average

Cumulative Shares

Dollar Amount

of Shares

Price Paid Per

Repurchased Under

Remaining Under

Repurchased

Share

the Program

The Program

February 2011 Program 

January 1 through January 31, 2020

-

$

-

8,645,873 

$

104,018,683 

February 1 through February 29, 2020

110,497

457.73

8,756,370

53,440,502

March 1 through March 31, 2019

114,503

433.67

8,870,873

$

253,783,766

First Quarter Total

225,000

$

445.49

  Total Number  Weighted Average  Cumulative Shares  Dollar Amount 
  of Shares  Price Paid Per  Repurchased Under  Remaining Under 
  Repurchased  Share  the Program  The Program 
             
February 2011 Program
            
January 1 through January 31, 2017  -  $-   7,315,718  $50,173,009 
February 1 through February 28, 2017  104,358   178.39   7,420,076   31,556,555 
March 1 through March 31, 2017  195,642   182.20   7,615,718  $95,910,768 
                 
First Quarter Total  300,000  $180.87         
                 
April 1 through April 30, 2017  -  $-   7,615,718  $95,910,768 
May 1 through May 31, 2017  150,000   205.34   7,765,718   65,109,586 
June 1 through June 30, 2017  -   -   7,765,718  $65,109,586 
                 
Second Quarter Total  150,000  $205.34         
                 
July 1 through July 31, 2017  -  $-   7,765,718  $65,109,586 
August 1 through August 31, 2017  47,726   191.53   7,813,444   55,968,634 
September 1 through September 30, 2017  2,274   191.42   7,815,718  $55,533,344 
                 
Third Quarter Total  50,000  $191.52         
On March 13, 2017 our Board of Directors authorized an additional $100 million under the February 2011 Repurchase Program.

Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities


None.


Item 4.   Mine Safety Disclosures


None.


Item 5.    Other Information


None.



-35-

-36-



Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit No.

Description

31.1

Exhibit No.

Description

31.1

Certification by Kevin J. McNamara pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2

Certification by David P. Williams pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934.1934.

31.3

Certification by Michael D. Witzeman pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1

Certification by Kevin J. McNamara pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Certification by David P. Williams pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.2002.

32.3

Certification by Michael D. Witzeman pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.2002

101.INS

101 

XBRL Instance Document

The following materials from Chemed Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2020 formatted in iXBRL (Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, (ii) The Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income, (iii) The Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, (iv) The Condensed Statement of Equity, and (v) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

104

101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

The cover page from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2020, formatted in iXBRL and contained in Exhibit 101.


SIGNATURES

-37-



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Chemed Corporation

(Registrant)

Chemed Corporation

(Registrant)

Dated:

October 27, 2017

By:

Dated:

May 1, 2020

By:

/s/ Kevin J. McNamara

Kevin J. McNamara

(President and Chief Executive Officer)

Dated:

Dated:

May 1, 2020

October 27, 2017

By:

By:

/s/ David P. Williams

David P. Williams

(Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer)

Dated:

Dated:

May 1, 2020

October 27, 2017

By:

By:

/s/ Michael D. Witzeman

Michael D. Witzeman

(Vice President and Controller)


-38-

-36-