UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



	~~[X]~~☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019



	~~[ ]~~☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

United States Steel Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware	1-16811	25-1897152
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)



600 Grant Street	Pittsburgh	PA	15219-2800
(Address of principal executive offices)			(Zip Code)

~~(412)~~ (412) 433-1121

(Registrant’s telephone number,

including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of each class	Trading Symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered
United States Steel Corporation Common Stock	X	New York Stock Exchange
United States Steel Corporation Common Stock	X	Chicago Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesüx Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ü] x No []o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated ~~filer” and~~filer,” “smaller reporting company”, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filerü

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

☐

Emerging growth company^(a) __

☐

^(a)If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ~~___~~

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐No x

~~Yes~~Noü

Common stock outstanding at October ~~26, 2018~~28, 2019 – ~~177,268,638~~170,037,954 shares

INDEX



			Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements:
		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (Unaudited)	1
		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)	2
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited)	3
		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	4
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	5
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3033
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	4852
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	4953
		Supplemental Statistics (Unaudited)	5054
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	5155
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	5862
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	5962
	Item 5.	~~Other Information~~Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	5962
��	Item 6.	Exhibits	5963
SIGNATURE			6064
WEB SITE POSTING			6064

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains information that may constitute ”forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 2727A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend the forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements in those sections. Generally, we have identified such forward-looking statements by using the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “project,” “target,” “forecast,” “aim,” "should," “will” and similar expressions or by using future dates in connection with any discussion of, among other things, operating performance, trends, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future, statements relating to volume ~~growth,~~changes, share of sales and earnings per share ~~growth,~~changes, and statements expressing general views about future operating results. However, the absence of these words or similar expressions does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but instead represent only the Company’s beliefs regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside of the Company’s control. It is possible that the Company’s actual results and financial condition may differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated results and financial condition indicated in these forward-looking statements. Management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the time made. However, caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements because such statements speak only as of the date when made. Our Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In addition, forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our Company's historical experience and our present expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to the risks and uncertainties described in this report and in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017, in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,~~ 2018, and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

References in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to "U. S. Steel," "the Company," "we," "us," and "our" refer to United States Steel Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries unless otherwise indicated by the context.

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	2019			2018			2019			2018
Net sales:
Net sales	$	2,702		$	3,351		$	9,001		$	9,415
Net sales to related parties (Note 21)	367			378			1,112			1,072
Total (Note 5)	3,069			3,729			10,113			10,487
Operating expenses (income):
Cost of sales (excludes items shown below)	2,902			3,172			9,301			9,101
Selling, general and administrative expenses	63			81			223			251
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	161			126			454			384
Earnings from investees	(31		)	(17		)	(68		)	(39		)
Gain on equity investee transactions (Note 26)	—			—			—			(18		)
Restructuring charges (Note 22)	54			—			54			—
Net (gain) loss on disposal of assets	(1		)	(5		)	3			(3		)
Other expense (income), net	1			(1		)	—			—
Total	3,149			3,356			9,967			9,676
(Loss) earnings before interest and income taxes	(80		)	373			146			811
Interest expense	32			41			97			134
Interest income	(3		)	(6		)	(13		)	(16		)
Loss on debt extinguishment (Note 11)	—			3			—			77
Other financial (benefits) costs	(4		)	2			(2		)	4
Net periodic benefit cost (other than service cost)	23			19			69			53
Net interest and other financial costs (Note 11)	48			59			151			252
(Loss) earnings before income taxes	(128		)	314			(5		)	559
Income tax (benefit) provision (Note 13)	(44		)	23			(43		)	36
Net (loss) earnings	(84		)	291			38			523
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests	—			—			—			—
Net (loss) earnings attributable to United States Steel Corporation	$	(84	)	$	291		$	38		$	523
(Loss) earnings per common share (Note 14):
Earnings per share attributable to United States Steel Corporation stockholders:
-Basic	$	(0.49	)	$	1.64		$	0.22		$	2.96
-Diluted	$	(0.49	)	$	1.62		$	0.22		$	2.92

Three Months Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 2018 2017 2018 2017
Net sales:

Net sales 3,351
$ 2,976
$ 9,415
$ 8,176
Net sales to related parties (Note 20) 378
272
1,072
941
Total (Note 5) 3,729
3,248
10,487
9,117
Operating expenses (income):
Cost of sales (excludes items shown below) 3,172
2,828
9,101
8,110
Selling, general and administrative expenses 81
75
251
223
Depreciation, depletion and amortization 126
118
384
376
Earnings from investees (17 ) (9 ) (39 ) (29 )
Gain on equity investee transactions (Note 24) —
(21 ) (18 ) (21 )
Gain associated with retained interest in U. S. Steel Canada Inc. (Note 23) —
—
—
(72 )
Restructuring and other charges (Note 21) —
(2 ) —
30
Net gain on disposal of assets (5 ) (1 ) (3 ) (2 )
Other income, net (1 ) —
—
(5 )
Total 3,356
2,988
9,676
8,610
Earnings before interest and income taxes 373
260
811
507
Interest expense 41
60
134
173
Interest income (6 ) (5 ) (16 ) (13 )
Loss on debt extinguishment (Note 9) 3
31
77
32
Other financial costs 2
12
4
37
Net periodic benefit cost (other than service cost) (Note 3) ^(a)
19
15
53
47
Net interest and other financial costs (Note 9) 59
113
252
276
Earnings before income taxes 314
147
559
231
Income tax provision (Note 11) 23
—
36
3
Net earnings 291
147
523
228
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests —
—
—
—
Net earnings attributable to United States Steel Corporation $ 291
$ 147
$ 523
$ 228
Earnings per common share (Note 12):

Earnings per share attributable to United States Steel Corporation stockholders:

-Basic $ 1.64
$ 0.84
$ 2.96
$ 1.30
-Diluted $ 1.62
$ 0.83
$ 2.92
$ 1.29

^(a) ~~Represents postretirement benefit expense as a result of the adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2017-07,~~ ~~Compensation - Retirement Benefits~~ ~~on January 1, 2018.~~

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,					Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2018			2017		2018			2017		2019			2018			2019			2018
Net earnings	$	291		$	147	$	523		$	228
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Net (loss) earnings											$	(84	)	$	291		$	38		$	523
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Changes in foreign currency translation adjustments	(10		)	44		(58		)	149		(40		)	(10		)	(45		)	(58		)
Changes in pension and other employee benefit accounts	50			55		143			146		30			50			94			143
Changes in derivative financial instruments	7			8		(11		)	6		(2		)	7			2			(11		)
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax	47			107		74			301		(12		)	47			51			74
Comprehensive income including noncontrolling interest	338			254		597			529
Comprehensive (loss) income including noncontrolling interest											(96		)	338			89			597
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest	—			—		—			—		—			—			—			—
Comprehensive income attributable to United States Steel Corporation	$	338		$	254	$	597		$	529
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to United States Steel Corporation											$	(96	)	$	338		$	89		$	597

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited)


(Dollars in millions)	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017			September 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 6)	$	1,344		$	1,553		$	476		$	1,000
Receivables, less allowance of $29 and $28	1,463			1,173
Receivables from related parties (Note 20)	210			206
Inventories (Note 13)	1,950			1,738
Receivables, less allowance of $27 and $29							1,183			1,435
Receivables from related parties (Note 21)							217			224
Inventories (Note 7)							2,071			2,092
Other current assets	101			85			95			79
Total current assets	5,068			4,755			4,042			4,830
Operating lease assets (Note 8)							239			—
Property, plant and equipment	15,698			15,086			16,725			16,008
Less accumulated depreciation and depletion	11,055			10,806			11,415			11,143
Total property, plant and equipment, net	4,643			4,280			5,310			4,865
Investments and long-term receivables, less allowance of $9 and $11	508			480
Intangibles – net (Note 7)	160			167
Deferred income tax benefits (Note 11)	56			56
Investments and long-term receivables, less allowance of $5 in both periods							576			513
Intangibles – net (Note 9)							152			158
Deferred income tax benefits (Note 13)							460			445
Other noncurrent assets	134			124			138			171
Total assets	$	10,569		$	9,862		$	10,917		$	10,982
Liabilities
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	$	2,419		$	2,096		$	2,138		$	2,454
Accounts payable to related parties (Note 20)	106			74
Accounts payable to related parties (Note 21)							111			81
Payroll and benefits payable	425			347			345			440
Accrued taxes	144			132			107			118
Accrued interest	38			69			26			39
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 15)	4			3
Current operating lease liabilities (Note 8)							56			—
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 16)							67			65
Total current liabilities	3,136			2,721			2,850			3,197
Long-term debt, less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs (Note 15)	2,498			2,700
Noncurrent operating lease liabilities (Note 8)							189			—
Long-term debt, less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs (Note 16)							2,500			2,316
Employee benefits	666			759			905			980
Deferred income tax liabilities (Note 11)	7			6
Deferred income tax liabilities (Note 13)							8			14
Deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities	320			355			265			272
Total liabilities	6,627			6,541			6,717			6,779
Contingencies and commitments (Note 22)
Stockholders’ Equity (Note 18):
Common stock (177,354,654 and 176,424,554 shares issued) (Note 12)	177			176
Treasury stock, at cost (96,399 shares and 1,203,344 shares)	(3		)	(76		)
Contingencies and commitments (Note 23)
Stockholders’ Equity (Note 19):
Common stock (178,542,856 and 177,386,430 shares issued) (Note 14)							179			177
Treasury stock, at cost (8,505,376 shares and 2,857,578 shares)							(173		)	(78		)
Additional paid-in capital	3,909			3,932			3,947			3,917
Retained earnings	629			133			1,221			1,212
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 19)	(771		)	(845		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (Note 20)							(975		)	(1,026		)
Total United States Steel Corporation stockholders’ equity	3,941			3,320			4,199			4,202
Noncontrolling interests	1			1			1			1
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	10,569		$	9,862		$	10,917		$	10,982

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2018			2017			2019			2018
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Operating activities:
Net earnings	$	523		$	228		$	38		$	523
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	384			376			454			384
Gain associated with retained interest in U. S. Steel Canada Inc. (Note 23)	—			(72		)
Gain on equity investee transactions (Note 24)	(18		)	(21		)
Restructuring and other charges (Note 21)	—			30
Loss on debt extinguishment (Note 9)	77			32
Gain on equity investee transactions (Note 26)							—			(18		)
Restructuring charges (Note 22)							54			—
Loss on debt extinguishment (Note 11)							—			77
Provision for doubtful accounts	4			1			—			4
Pensions and other postretirement benefits	57			42			76			57
Deferred income taxes (Note 11)	1			7
Net gain on disposal of assets	(3		)	(2		)
Deferred income taxes (Note 13)							(38		)	1
Net loss (gain) on disposal of assets							3			(3		)
Equity investee earnings, net of distributions received	(35		)	(18		)	(64		)	(35		)
Changes in:
Current receivables	(357		)	(214		)	209			(357		)
Inventories	(228		)	(123		)	(4		)	(228		)
Current accounts payable and accrued expenses	302			121			(325		)	285
Income taxes receivable/payable	53			15			27			53
Bank checks outstanding	1			12			—			1
All other, net	(39		)	132			(34		)	(22		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	722			546			396			722
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(646		)	(291		)	(978		)	(646		)
Disposal of assets	10			—			4			10
Proceeds from sale of ownership interest in equity investee (Note 24)	—			105
Investments, net	(1		)	(3		)	—			(1		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(637		)	(189		)	(974		)	(637		)
Financing activities:
Issuance of long-term debt, net of financing costs (Note 15)	640			737
Repayment of long-term debt (Note 15)	(922		)	(906		)
Revolving and other credit facilities - borrowings, net (Note 16)							165			—
Issuance of long-term debt, net of financing costs (Note 16)							—			640
Repayment of long-term debt (Note 16)							(4		)	(922		)
Common stock repurchased (Note 25)							(88		)	—
Dividends paid	(27		)	(26		)	(26		)	(27		)
Receipt from exercise of stock options	34			14			—			34
Taxes paid for equity compensation plans (Note 10)	(9		)	(10		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(284		)	(191		)
Taxes paid for equity compensation plans (Note 12)							(7		)	(9		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities							40			(284		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(13		)	15			(6		)	(13		)
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	(212		)	181
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash							(544		)	(212		)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year (Note 6)	1,597			1,555			1,040			1,597
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period (Note 6)	$	1,385		$	1,736		$	496		$	1,385

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

United States Steel Corporation (U. S. Steel, or the Company) produces and sells steel products, including flat-rolled and tubular products, in North America and Europe. Operations in North America also include iron ore and coke production facilities, railroad services and real estate operations. Operations in Europe also include coke production facilities.

The year-end Consolidated Balance Sheet data was derived from audited statements but does not include all disclosures required for complete financial statements by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). The other information in these condensed financial statements is unaudited but, in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods covered. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature unless disclosed otherwise. These condensed financial statements, including notes, have been prepared in accordance with the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. Additional information is contained in the United States Steel Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, which should be read in conjunction with these condensed financial statements.

2. New Accounting Standards

In August 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update ~~(ASU)~~ 2018-14, Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans- General (Subtopic 715-20), Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans ~~(ASU~~(ASU 2018-14). ASU 2018-14 removes certain disclosures that the FASB no longer considers cost beneficial, adds certain disclosure requirements and clarifies others. ASU 2018-14 is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. U. S. Steel is currently assessing the impact of the ASU on its defined benefit plan disclosures.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurementof Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ~~(ASU~~(ASU 2016-13), which adds an impairment model that is based on expected losses rather than incurred losses. Under ASU 2016-13, an entity recognizes as an allowance its estimate of expected credit losses, which the FASB believes will result in more timely recognition of such losses. ASU 2016-13 is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 including interim reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. U. S. Steel is currently assessing the impact of the ASU, but does not believe this ASU will have a material impact on its overall Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3. Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (ASU 2016-02). ~~ASU 2016-02 supersedes prior lease accounting guidance.~~ Under ASU 2016-02, for operating leases, a lessee should recognize in its statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term; recognize a single lease cost, which is allocated over the lease term, generally on a straight line basis, and classify all cash payments within operating activities in the statement of cash flows. For ~~financing~~finance leases, a lessee is required to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability; recognize interest on the lease liability separately from amortization of the right-of-use asset, and classify repayments of the principal portion of the lease liability within financing activities and payments of interest on the lease liability within operating activities in the statement of cash flows. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. In addition, at the inception of a contract, an entity should determine whether the contract is or contains a lease. ASU 2016-02 is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842) ~~- Targeted~~-Targeted Improvements (ASU 2018-11), which provides an option to use a modified retrospective transition method at the adoption date. U. S. Steel ~~expects to adopt~~adopted the new lease accounting standard ~~at the adoption date~~effective January 1, 2019 using the optional modified retrospective transition method outlined in ASU 2018-11. ~~U. S. Steel has completed its inventory~~As a result of ~~leases. Based on our~~the adoption, an operating lease ~~portfolio~~asset and ~~estimated secured borrowing rates at September 30, 2018, we anticipate that the impact of adoption will result in~~current and noncurrent liabilities for operating leases were recorded, and there was an insignificant reduction in prior year retained earnings for the cumulative effect of adoption ~~and a right of use asset and total~~for operating leases where payment started after lease liability in the range of $200 million to $275 million. We estimate that the short-term portion of the total lease liability will be between $45 million and $75 million. We anticipate changes in our lease portfolio and estimated borrowing rates which will cause the actual impact of adoption to vary.commencement. See Note 8 for further details.

3. ~~Recently Adopted Accounting Standards~~

~~In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02,~~ ~~Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income~~ ~~(ASU 2018-02)~~. ASU 2018-02 allows a reclassification from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to Retained Earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (2017 Act). The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and for interim periods therein; early adoption is permitted. U. S. Steel adopted ASU 2018-02 on July 1, 2018, and elected not to reclassify the stranded tax effects related to the 2017 Act. As a result, the adoption did not have an impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. U. S. Steel's ~~accounting policy is to release stranded income tax effects from AOCI when~~adoption of the ~~circumstances upon which the stranded tax effects are premised cease to exist.~~

~~In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12,~~ ~~Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities~~ (ASU 2017-12), which amends and simplifies hedge accounting guidance so that companies could more accurately present the economic effects of risk management activities in the financial statements. ASU 2017-12 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted. U. S. Steel adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-12 on January 1, 2018. The adoption did not result in a material impact to our financial results; however, we expanded our use of hedge accountingfollowing ASU's effective January 1, ~~2018 as well as our disclosures of derivative activity. See Note 14 for further details.~~

~~In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09,~~ ~~Compensation – Stock Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting~~ (ASU 2017-09). The amendments included in ASU 2017-09 provide guidance about which changes to the terms and conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting. The amendments in this update will be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. On January 1, 2018, U. S. Steel adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-09 and the adoption did not have an impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07,~~ ~~Compensation - Retirement Benefits~~ (ASU 2017-07). ASU 2017-07 requires an employer who offers defined benefit and postretirement benefit plans to report the service cost component of the net periodic benefit cost in the same line item or items as other compensation cost arising from services rendered by employees during the period. The other components of net periodic benefit costs are required to be presented on a retrospective basis in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. The ASU also allows for the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost to be eligible for capitalization into inventory when applicable. ASU 2017-07 was effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods; early adoption was permitted. U. S. Steel adopted ASU 2017-07 on January 1, 2018. U. S. Steel has historically capitalized the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost into inventory, when applicable, and will continue to do so prospectively.

The effect of the retrospective presentation change related to the net periodic benefit cost of our defined benefit pension and other post-employment benefits (OPEB) plans on our consolidated statement of operations was as follows:

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Statement of Operations (In millions)
As Revised Previously Reported Effect of Change Higher/(Lower)
Cost of Sales $ 2,828
$ 2,829
$ (1 )
Selling, general and administrative expenses 75
89
(14 )
Net periodic benefit cost (other than service cost) 15
—
15

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Statement of Operations (In millions)
As Revised Previously Reported Effect of Change Higher/(Lower)
Cost of Sales $ 8,110
$ 8,115
$ (5 )
Selling, general and administrative expenses 223
265
(42 )
Net periodic benefit cost (other than service cost) 47
—
47

~~In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18,~~ ~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash~~ (ASU 2016-18). The ASU reduced diversity in practice in the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the statement of cash flows by including restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. On January 1, 2018, U. S. Steel adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-18 using a retrospective transition method. As a result, the Change in Restricted Cash, Net line that was included in the investing activities section of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows has been eliminated as changes in restricted cash are now included in the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash amounts. Expanded disclosures have been included, which describe the components of cash shown on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. See Note 6 for further details.

~~In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,~~ ~~Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments~~ (ASU 2016-15). ASU 2016-15 reduced diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows by addressing eight specific cash receipt and cash payment issues. On January 1, 2018, U. S. Steel adopted the provisions of ASU 2016-15 using a retrospective transition method. As a result, all payments to extinguish debt will now be presented as cash outflows from financing activities on our Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in accordance with ASU 2016-15. U. S. Steel has historically presented make-whole premiums as cash outflows from operating activities. There was a $4 million cash outflow for make-whole premiums that was reclassified from cash provided by operating activities to the repayment of long-term debt line within the cash used in financing activities section on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The other cash receipt and cash payment items addressed in ASU 2016-15 did not have an impact on the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Additionally, the Company has elected to use the cumulative earnings approach as defined in ASU 2016-15 to classify distributions received from equity method investees.

~~In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~ (ASU 2014-09). ASU 2014-09 and its related amendments (Revenue Recognition Standard) outline a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and superseded most previous revenue recognition guidance.On January 1, 2018, U. S. Steel adopted the Revenue Recognition Standard using the full retrospective method. Generally, U. S. Steel’s performance obligations are satisfied, control of our products is transferred, and revenue is recognized at a single point in time. ~~The adoption~~2019 did not have a ~~financial statement~~material impact toon U. S. ~~Steel but did result in expanded disclosures. See Note 5 for further details.~~Steel's financial position, results of operations or cash flows:



Accounting Standard Update
2018-07	Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting
2018-15	Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract

4. Segment Information

U. S. Steel has ~~three~~3 reportable segments: (1) Flat-Rolled Products (Flat-Rolled), which consists of the following ~~three~~3 commercial entities that directly interact with our customers and service their needs: (i) automotive solutions, (ii) consumer solutions, and (iii) industrial, service center and mining solutions; (2) U. S. Steel Europe (USSE); and (3) Tubular Products (Tubular). The results of our railroad and real estate businesses that do not constitute reportable segments are combined and disclosed in the Other Businesses category.

The chief operating decision maker evaluates performance and determines resource allocations based on a number of factors, the primary measure being earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes. Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes for reportable segments and Other Businesses does not include net interest and other financial costs (income), income taxes, and certain other items that management believes are not indicative of future results.

The accounting principles applied at the operating segment level in determining earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes are generally the same as those applied at the consolidated financial statement level.

Intersegment sales and transfers are accounted for at market-based prices and are eliminated at the corporate consolidation level. Corporate-level selling, general and administrative expenses and costs related to certain former businesses are allocated to the reportable segments and Other Businesses based on measures of activity that management believes are reasonable.

The results of segment operations for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 are:



(In millions) Three Months Ended September 30, 2019	Customer Sales		Intersegment Sales			Net Sales			Earnings from investees		Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes
Flat-Rolled	$	2,277	$	86		$	2,363		$	30	$	46
USSE	518		3			521			—		(46		)
Tubular	262		1			263			1		(25		)
Total reportable segments	3,057		90			3,147			31		(25		)
Other Businesses	12		28			40			—		8
Reconciling Items and Eliminations	—		(118		)	(118		)	—		(63		)
Total	$	3,069	$	—		$	3,069		$	31	$	(80	)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
Flat-Rolled	$	2,632	$	32		$	2,664		$	15	$	305
USSE	767		4			771			—		72
Tubular	313		2			315			2		7
Total reportable segments	3,712		38			3,750			17		384
Other Businesses	17		31			48			—		16
Reconciling Items and Eliminations	—		(69		)	(69		)	—		(27		)
Total	$	3,729	$	—		$	3,729		$	17	$	373

(In millions) Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
Customer
Sales Intersegment
Sales Net
Sales Earnings
from
investees Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes
Flat-Rolled $ 2,632
$ 32
$ 2,664
$ 15
$ 305
USSE 767
4
771
—
72
Tubular 313
2
315
2
7
Total reportable segments 3,712
38
3,750
17
384
Other Businesses 17
31
48
—
16
Reconciling Items and Eliminations —
(69 ) (69 ) —
(27 )
Total $ 3,729
$ —
$ 3,729
$ 17
$ 373

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Flat-Rolled $ 2,249
$ 42
$ 2,291
$ 7
$ 161
USSE 710
1
711
—
73
Tubular 276
—
276
2
(7 )
Total reportable segments 3,235
43
3,278
9
227
Other Businesses 13
29
42
—
12
Reconciling Items and Eliminations —
(72 ) (72 ) —
21
Total $ 3,248
$ —
$ 3,248
$ 9
$ 260

The results of segment operations for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 are:



(In millions) Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019	Customer Sales		Intersegment Sales			Net Sales			Earnings from investees		Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes
Flat-Rolled	$	7,221	$	250		$	7,471		$	63	$	275
USSE	1,933		9			1,942			—		(27		)
Tubular	921		4			925			5		(21		)
Total reportable segments	10,075		263			10,338			68		227
Other Businesses	38		88			126			—		26
Reconciling Items and Eliminations	—		(351		)	(351		)	—		(107		)
Total	$	10,113	$	—		$	10,113		$	68	$	146

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
Flat-Rolled	$	7,114	$	148		$	7,262		$	34	$	562
USSE	2,438		20			2,458			—		297
Tubular	888		4			892			5		(55		)
Total reportable segments	10,440		172			10,612			39		804
Other Businesses	47		94			141			—		44
Reconciling Items and Eliminations	—		(266		)	(266		)	—		(37		)
Total	$	10,487	$	—		$	10,487		$	39	$	811

(In millions) Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
Customer
Sales Intersegment
Sales Net
Sales Earnings (Loss)
from
investees Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes
Flat-Rolled $ 7,114
$ 148
$ 7,262
$ 34
$ 562
USSE 2,438
20
2,458
—
297
Tubular 888
4
892
5
(55 )
Total reportable segments 10,440
172
10,612
39
804
Other Businesses 47
94
141
—
44
Reconciling Items and Eliminations —
(266 ) (266 ) —
(37 )
Total $ 10,487
$ —
$ 10,487
$ 39
$ 811

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Flat-Rolled $ 6,265
$ 154
$ 6,419
$ 24
$ 293
USSE 2,123
25
2,148
—
215
Tubular 682
—
682
6
(93 )
Total reportable segments 9,070
179
9,249
30
415
Other Businesses 47
89
136
(1 ) 34
Reconciling Items and Eliminations —
(268 ) (268 ) —
58
Total $ 9,117
$ —
$ 9,117
$ 29
$ 507

The following is a schedule of reconciling items to consolidated earnings ~~(loss)~~ before interest and income taxes:



	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In millions)	2019			2018			2019			2018
Items not allocated to segments:
December 24, 2018 Clairton coke making facility fire	$	(9	)	$	—		$	(53	)	$	—
Restructuring charges	(54		)	—			(54		)	—
Gain on equity investee transactions (Note 26)	—			—			—			18
Granite City Works restart costs	—			(27		)	—			(63		)
Granite City Works adjustment to temporary idling charges	—			—			—			8
Total reconciling items	$	(63	)	$	(27	)	$	(107	)	$	(37	)

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In millions) 2018 2017 2018 2017
Items not allocated to segments:

Gain on equity investee transactions (Note 24) $ —
$ 21
$ 18
$ 21
Granite City Works restart costs (27 ) —
(63 ) —
Granite City Works adjustment to temporary idling charges —
—
8
—
Loss on shutdown of certain tubular assets ^(a)
—
—
—
(35 )
Gain associated with retained interest in U. S. Steel Canada Inc. (Note 23) —
—
—
72
Total reconciling items $ (27 ) $ 21
$ (37 ) $ 58

^(a)~~Included in Restructuring and other charges in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.~~5. Revenue

5. ~~Revenue~~

Revenue is generated primarily from contracts to produce, ship and deliver steel products, and to a lesser extent, to deliver raw materials such as iron ore pellets, to deliver coke by-productsand for railroad services and real estate sales. Generally, U. S. Steel’s performance obligations are satisfied, control of our products is transferred, and revenue is recognized at a single point in time, when title transfers to our customer for product shipped or ~~when~~ services are provided. Revenues are recorded net of any sales incentives. Shipping and other transportation costs charged to customers are treated as fulfillment activities and are recorded in both revenue and cost of sales at the time control is transferred to the customer. Costs related to obtaining sales contracts are incidental and are expensed when incurred. Because customers are invoiced at the time title transfers and U. S. Steel’s right to consideration is unconditional at that time, U. S. Steel does not maintain contract asset balances. Additionally, U. S. Steel does not maintain contract liability balances, as performance obligations are satisfied prior to customer payment for product. U. S. Steel offers industry standard payment terms.

U. S. Steel has ~~three~~3 reportable segments: Flat-Rolled, USSE and Tubular. Flat-Rolled primarily generates revenue from sheet and coated product sales to North American customers. Flat-Rolled also sells slabs, iron ore pellets and coke making by-products. USSE sells slabs, sheet, strip mill plate, coated products and spiral welded pipe to customers primarily in the Eastern European market. Tubular sells seamless and electric resistance welded (ERW) steel casing and tubing (commonly known as oil country tubular goods or OCTG), standard and line pipe and mechanical tubing and primarily serves customers in the oil, gas and petrochemical markets. Revenue from our railroad and real estate businesses is reported in the Other Businesses category in our segment reporting structure. The following tables disaggregate our revenue by product for each of our reportable business segments for the three months and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively:

~~Customer~~Net Sales by Product (In millions):


(In millions) Three Months Ended September 30, 2018	Flat-Rolled		USSE		Tubular		Other Businesses		Total
Three Months Ended September 30, 2019											Flat-Rolled		USSE		Tubular		Other Businesses		Total
Semi-finished	$	40	$	83	$	—	$	—	$	123	$	69	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	71
Hot-rolled sheets	764		267		—		—		1,031		537		199		—		—		736
Cold-rolled sheets	718		91		—		—		809		627		59		—		—		686
Coated sheets	829		282		—		—		1,111		765		231		—		—		996
Tubular products	—		12		304		—		316		—		11		257		—		268
All Other^(a)	281		32		9		17		339		279		16		5		12		312
Total	$	2,632	$	767	$	313	$	17	$	3,729	$	2,277	$	518	$	262	$	12	$	3,069

^(a)Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.


(In millions) Three Months Ended September 30, 2017	Flat-Rolled		USSE		Tubular		Other Businesses		Total
Three Months Ended September 30, 2018											Flat-Rolled		USSE		Tubular		Other Businesses		Total
Semi-finished	$	15	$	51	$	—	$	—	$	66	$	40	$	83	$	—	$	—	$	123
Hot-rolled sheets	525		273		—		—		798		764		267		—		—		1,031
Cold-rolled sheets	576		79		—		—		655		718		91		—		—		809
Coated sheets	787		267		—		—		1,054		829		282		—		—		1,111
Tubular products	—		11		268		—		279		—		12		304		—		316
All Other ^(a)	346		29		8		13		396		281		32		9		17		339
Total	$	2,249	$	710	$	276	$	13	$	3,248	$	2,632	$	767	$	313	$	17	$	3,729

^(a)Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.


(In millions) Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018	Flat-Rolled		USSE		Tubular		Other Businesses		Total
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019											Flat-Rolled		USSE		Tubular		Other Businesses		Total
Semi-finished	$	50	$	172	$	—	$	—	$	222	$	278	$	11	$	—	$	—	$	289
Hot-rolled sheets	1,976		959		—		—		2,935		1,982		818		—		—		2,800
Cold-rolled sheets	2,092		293		—		—		2,385		1,931		229		—		—		2,160
Coated sheets	2,332		889		—		—		3,221		2,309		779		—		—		3,088
Tubular products	—		37		862		—		899		—		31		903		—		934
All Other^(a)	664		88		26		47		825		721		65		18		38		842
Total	$	7,114	$	2,438	$	888	$	47	$	10,487	$	7,221	$	1,933	$	921	$	38	$	10,113

^(a)Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.


(In millions) Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017	Flat-Rolled		USSE		Tubular		Other Businesses		Total
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018											Flat-Rolled		USSE		Tubular		Other Businesses		Total
Semi-finished	$	16	$	155	$	—	$	—	$	171	$	50	$	172	$	—	$	—	$	222
Hot-rolled sheets	1,507		862		—		—		2,369		1,976		959		—		—		2,935
Cold-rolled sheets	1,761		235		—		—		1,996		2,092		293		—		—		2,385
Coated sheets	2,291		774		—		—		3,065		2,332		889		—		—		3,221
Tubular products	—		30		656		—		686		—		37		862		—		899
All Other ^(a)	690		67		26		47		830		664		88		26		47		825
Total	$	6,265	$	2,123	$	682	$	47	$	9,117	$	7,114	$	2,438	$	888	$	47	$	10,487

^(a)Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.

6. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within U. S. Steel's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets that sum to the total of the same amounts shown in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:



(In millions)	September 30, 2019		September 30, 2018
Cash and cash equivalents	$	476	$	1,344
Restricted cash in other current assets	—		4
Restricted cash in other noncurrent assets	20		37
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	496	$	1,385

(In millions) September 30, 2018 September 30, 2017
Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,344
$ 1,694
Restricted cash in other current assets 4
—
Restricted cash in other noncurrent assets 37
42
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $ 1,385
$ 1,736

Amounts included in restricted cash represent cash balances which are legally or contractually restricted, primarily for environmental capital expenditure projects and insurance purposes.

7. Inventories

Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market for last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventories and lower of cost and net realizable value for first-in, first-out (FIFO) method inventories. The LIFO method is the predominant method of inventory costing in the United States. The FIFO method is the predominant inventory costing method in Europe. At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the LIFO method accounted for 71 percent and 74 percent of total inventory values, respectively.



(In millions)	September 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Raw materials	$	661	$	605
Semi-finished products	911		1,021
Finished products	441		404
Supplies and sundry items	58		62
Total	$	2,071	$	2,092

Current acquisition costs were estimated to exceed the above inventory values by $999 million and $1,038 million at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. As a result of the liquidation of LIFO inventories, cost of sales decreased and earnings before interest and income taxes increased by $12 million and $5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively. As a result of the liquidation of LIFO inventories, cost of sales decreased and earnings before interest and income taxes increased by $4 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Inventory includes $40 million and $39 million of land held for residential/commercial development as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

8. Leases

Effective January 1, 2019, U. S. Steel adopted ASU 2016-02 using the optional modified retrospective transition method outlined in ASU 2018-11 which permitted application of ASU 2016-02 on January 1, 2019 using a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings. As of September 30, 2019, an operating lease asset of $239 million and current and noncurrent liabilities for operating leases of $56 million and $189 million, respectively, were recorded (see below tabular disclosure for further details). There was an insignificant cumulative effect of adoption for operating lease liabilities that exceeded their related asset values for leases where payment started after lease commencement.

Operating lease assets consist primarily of office space, heavy mobile equipment used in our mining operations and facilities and equipment under operating service agreements for electricity generation and scrap processing. We also have operating lease assets for light mobile equipment and information technology assets. Significant finance leases include the Fairfield slab caster lease and heavy mobile equipment used in our mining operations (see Note 16 for further details). Variable lease payments are primarily related to operating service agreements where payment is solely dependent on consumption of certain services, such as raw material and by-product processing. Most long-term leases include renewal options and, in certain leases, purchase options. Generally, we are not reasonably certain that these options will be exercised. We have residual value guarantees under certain light mobile equipment leases. There is no impact to our leased assets for residual value guarantees as the potential loss is not probable (see “Other Contingencies” in Note 23 for further details). We do not have material restrictive covenants associated with our leases or material amounts of sublease income. From time to time, U. S. Steel may enter into arrangements for the construction or purchase of an asset and then enter into a financing arrangement to lease the asset. U. S. Steel recognizes leased assets and liabilities under these arrangements when it obtains control of the asset.

U. S. Steel elected the option within ASU 2016-02 to straight-line expense and not record assets or liabilities for leases with an initial term of 12 months or less. For leases beginning in 2019 and later, we separate non-lease components from lease components for leases under operating service agreements. We do not separate non-lease components for other lease types as they are not significant. The Company does not have secured notes outstanding; therefore, we use an estimated secured borrowing rate as the discount rate for most of our leases. In accordance with the practical expedients outlined in ASU 2016-02, we did not use hindsight in determining the lease term for existing leases and elected not to reassess the following for existing leases: whether contracts contain a lease, lease classification, and initial direct costs.

The following table summarizes the lease amounts included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2019.



(In millions)	Balance Sheet Location	September 30, 2019
Assets
Operating	Operating lease assets ^(a)	$	239
Finance	Property, plant and equipment ^(b)	49
Total Lease Assets		$	288

Liabilities
Current
Operating	Current operating lease liabilities	$	56
Finance	Current portion of long-term debt	8
Non-Current
Operating	Noncurrent operating lease liabilities	189
Finance	Long-term debt less unamortized discount and issue costs	47
Total Lease Liabilities		$	300

^(a) Operating lease assets are recorded net of accumulated amortization of $37 million.

^(b) Finance lease assets are recorded net of accumulated depreciation of $24 million.

The following table summarizes lease costs included in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2019.



(In millions)	Classification	Three Months Ended September 30, 2019		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019
Operating Lease Cost ^(a)	Cost of sales	$	21	$	61
Operating Lease Cost	Selling, general and administrative expenses	2		8
Finance Lease Cost
Amortization	Depreciation, depletion and amortization	2		4
Interest	Interest expense	1		2
Total Lease Cost		$	26	$	75

^(a) Operating lease cost recorded in cost of sales includes $4 million and $13 million of variable lease cost for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively. An immaterial amount of variable lease cost is included in selling, general and administrative expenses and immaterial amounts of short-term lease cost are included in cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expenses.

Lease liability maturities as of September 30, 2019 are shown below.



(In millions)	Operating		Finance		Total
2019	$	22	$	4	$	26
2020	66		11		77
2021	55		11		66
2022	44		17		61
2023	35		6		41
After 2023	82		17		99
Total Lease Payments	$	304	$	66	$	370
Less: Interest	59		11		70
Present value of lease liabilities	$	245	$	55	$	300

Future minimum commitments for capital and operating leases having non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of the year ended December 31, 2018 were as follows.



(In millions)	Capital Leases		Operating Leases
2019	$	5	$	66
2020	5		55
2021	5		45
2022	11		37
2023	—		28
After 2023	—		72
Total minimum lease payments	$	26	$	303
Less imputed interest costs	4
Present value of net minimum lease payments included in long-term debt	$	22

Lease terms and discount rates are shown below.



	September 30, 2019
Weighted average lease term
Finance	6 years
Operating	6 years

Weighted average discount rate
Finance	6.22	%
Operating	7.74	%

Supplemental cash flow information related to leases follows.



(In millions)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2019		Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases	$	18	$	54
Operating cash flows from finance leases	1		2
Financing cash flows from finance leases	3		4
Right-of-use assets exchanged for lease liabilities:
Operating leases	14		38
Finance leases	2		37

9. Intangible Assets

Intangible assets that are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives are detailed below:



		As of September 30, 2019						As of December 31, 2018
(In millions)	Useful Lives	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount
Customer relationships	22 Years	$	132	$	75	$	57	$	132	$	70	$	62
Patents	10-15 Years	22		8		14		22		7		15
Other	4-20 Years	14		8		6		14		8		6
Total amortizable intangible assets		$	168	$	91	$	77	$	168	$	85	$	83

As of September 30, 2018 As of December 31, 2017
(In millions) Useful
Lives Gross
Carrying
Amount Accumulated
Amortization Net
Amount Gross
Carrying
Amount Accumulated
Amortization Net
Amount
Customer relationships 22 Years $ 132
$ 69
$ 63
$ 132
$ 64
$ 68
Patents 10-15 Years
22
6
16
22
5
17
Other 4-20 Years 14
8
6
15
8
7
Total amortizable intangible assets
$ 168
$ 83
$ 85
$ 169
$ 77
$ 92

Identifiable intangible assets with finite lives are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying values may not be recoverable.

Amortization expense was $2$2 million in both the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018. Amortization expense was $6 million in both the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018. The estimated amortization expense for the remainder of ~~2018~~2019 is $2 million. We expect a consistent level of annual amortization expense through ~~2022.~~2023.

~~In addition, the~~The carrying amount of acquired water rights with indefinite lives as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 totaled $75 million. The acquired water rights are tested for impairment annually in the third quarter, or whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. U. S. Steel performed a ~~qualitative~~quantitative impairment evaluation of its acquired water rights during the third quarter of ~~2018.~~2019. Based on the results of the evaluation, the water rights were not impaired.

10. Pensions and Other Benefits

The following table reflects the components of net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018:


	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits						Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
(In millions)	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018			2019			2018
Service cost	$	12		$	13		$	4		$	4		$	11		$	12		$	4		$	4
Interest cost	58			59			23			23			59			58			22			23
Expected return on plan assets	(90		)	(98		)	(20		)	(16		)	(81		)	(90		)	(19		)	(20		)
Amortization of prior service cost	—			—			7			8			—			—			8			7
Amortization of actuarial net loss	38			37			1			1			33			38			—			1
Net periodic benefit cost, excluding below	18			11			15			20			22			18			15			15
Multiemployer plans	16			15			—			—			20			16			—			—
Settlement, termination and curtailment losses ^(a)	$	10		$	1		$	—		$	—		3			10			—			—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	44		$	27		$	15		$	20		$	45		$	44		$	15		$	15

^(a)During the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, the non-qualified pension plan incurred settlement charges of approximately $3 million and $10 million, respectively, due to lump sum payments for certain individuals.

The following table reflects the components of net periodic benefit cost for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017:~~2018:



	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
(In millions)	2019			2018			2019			2018
Service cost	$	33		$	37		$	10		$	12
Interest cost	178			174			68			69
Expected return on plan assets	(243		)	(270		)	(59		)	(61		)
Amortization of prior service cost	1			—			22			22
Amortization of actuarial net loss	99			114			2			3
Net periodic benefit cost, excluding below	68			55			43			45
Multiemployer plans	57			45			—			—
Settlement, termination and curtailment losses ^(a)	3			10			—			—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	128		$	110		$	43		$	45

Pension
Benefits Other
Benefits
(In millions) 2018 2017 2018 2017
Service cost $ 37
$ 37
$ 12
$ 13
Interest cost 174
177
69
70
Expected return on plan assets (270 ) (292 ) (61 ) (49 )
Amortization of prior service cost —
—
22
22
Amortization of actuarial net loss 114
111
3
3
Net periodic benefit cost, excluding below 55
33
45
59
Multiemployer plans 45
44
—
—
Settlement, termination and curtailment losses ^(a)
10
5
—
—
Net periodic benefit cost $ 110
$ 82
$ 45
$ 59

^(a)During the first nine months of ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the non-qualified pension plan incurred settlement charges of approximately ~~$10~~$3 million and $5$10 million, respectively, due to lump sum payments for certain individuals.

Employer Contributions

During the first nine months of ~~2018~~2019, U. S. Steel made cash payments of ~~$45~~$58 million to the Steelworkers’ Pension Trust and ~~$19~~$8 million of pension payments not funded by trusts.

During the first nine months of ~~2018~~2019, cash payments of ~~$36~~$33 million were made for other postretirement benefit payments not funded by trusts.

Company contributions to defined contribution plans totaled ~~$13~~$12 million and ~~$11~~$13 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019and2018,~~and2017,~~ respectively. Company contributions to defined contribution plans totaled ~~$35~~$34 million and ~~$30~~$35 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively.

11. Net Interest and Other Financial Costs

Net interest and other financial costs includes interest expense (net of capitalized interest), interest income, financing costs, net periodic benefit costs (other than service costs) related to pension and other ~~post-~~

~~employment~~post-employment benefits (OPEB) plans, and foreign currency derivative and remeasurement gains and losses. During the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018, net foreign currency gains of $3$8 million and ~~losses of $6~~$3 million, respectively were recorded in other financial costs. During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, net foreign currency gains of ~~$11~~$15 million and ~~losses of $21~~$11 million, respectively, were recorded in other financial costs. Additionally, during the nine months ended September 30, 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ there ~~were losses~~was a loss on debt ~~extinguishments~~extinguishment recognized of $77 ~~million and $32 million, respectively.~~million. There were 0 debt extinguishment transactions during the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

See Note 1415 for additional information on U. S. Steel’s use of derivatives to mitigate its foreign currency exchange rate exposure.

~~10.~~ 12. Stock-Based Compensation Plans

U. S. Steel has outstanding stock-based compensation awards that were granted by the Compensation & Organization Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee) under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2005 Plan) and the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan (the Omnibus Plan)~~, which are more fully described in Note 14 of the United States Steel Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.~~. On April 26, 2016, the Company's stockholders approved the Omnibus Plan and authorized the Company to issue up to 7,200,000 shares of U. S. Steel common stock under the Omnibus Plan. The Company's stockholders authorized the issuance of an additional 6,300,000 shares under the Omnibus Plan on April 25, 2017. While the awards that were previously granted under the 2005 Plan remain outstanding, all future awards will be granted under the Omnibus Plan. As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019, there were ~~10,993,930~~6,996,547 shares available for future grants under the Omnibus Plan.

Recent grants of stock-based compensation consist of ~~stock options,~~ restricted stock units, total shareholder return (TSR) performance awards and return on capital employed (ROCE) performance awards. ~~Stock options are generally issued at the market price~~Shares of ~~the underlying stock on the date of the grant. Upon exercise of stock options, shares of U. S. Steel~~ common stock ~~were issued from treasury stock. Beginning in 2018, shares of common stock~~under the Omnibus Plan are issued from authorized, but unissued stock. The following table is a ~~general~~ summary of the awards made under the Omnibus Plan during the first nine months of ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017. There were no stock options granted during the first nine months of~~ 2018.


	2018			2017			2019			2018
Grant Details	Shares^(a)	Fair Value^(b)		Shares^(a)	Fair Value^(b)		Shares^(a)	Fair Value^(b)		Shares^(a)	Fair Value^(b)
Stock Options	—	$	—	647,780	$	17.28
Restricted Stock Units	742,495	$	41.44	344,500	$	36.27	1,005,500	$	23.76	742,495	$	41.44
Performance Awards ^(c)
TSR	79,190	$	61.57	169,850	$	40.72	210,520	$	29.22	79,190	$	61.57
ROCE ^(d)	247,510	$	43.50	—	$	—
ROCE							527,470	$	23.90	247,510	$	43.50

^(a) The share amounts shown in this table do not reflect an adjustment for estimated forfeitures.

^(b) Represents the per share weighted-average for all grants during the period.

^(c) The number of performance awards shown represents the target value of the award.

^(d) ~~The ROCE awards granted in 2017 are not shown in the table above because they were granted in cash.~~

U. S. Steel recognized pretax stock-based compensation expense in the amount of $9$10 million and $6$9 million in the three-month periods ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, and ~~$26~~$30 million and ~~$21~~$26 million in the first nine months of 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively.

As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019, total future compensation expense related to nonvested stock-based compensation arrangements was $2927 million, and the weighted average period over which this expense is expected to be recognized is approximately ~~1 year~~18 months.

Compensation expense for stock options is recorded over the vesting period based on the fair value on the date of grant, as calculated by U. S. Steel using the Black-Scholes model. The stock options generally vest ratably over a three-year service period and have a term of ten years.

The expected annual dividends per share are based on the latest annualized dividend rate at the date of grant; the expected life in years is determined primarily from historical stock option exercise data; the expected volatility

~~is based on the historical volatility of U. S. Steel stock; and the risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury strip rate for the expected life of the option.~~

Restricted stock units awarded as part of annual grants generally vest ratably over three years. Their fair value is the market price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Restricted stock units granted in connection with new-hire or retention grants generally cliff vest three years from the date of the grant.

TSR performance awards may vest at varying levels at the end of a ~~three-year~~three-year performance period if U. S. Steel's total shareholder return compared to the total shareholder return of a peer group of companies ~~over the~~ ~~three-year performance period~~ meets performance criteria ~~established by~~during the ~~Committee at the beginning of the~~three-year performance period. ~~Performance~~TSR performance awards can vest at between~~zero~~

0 and 200 percent of the target award. The fair value of the TSR performance awards is calculated using a Monte-Carlo simulation.

ROCE performance awards may vest at the end of a three-year performance period contingent upon meeting the specified ROCE ~~metric established by the Committee at the beginning of the performance period.~~goal. ROCE performance awards can vest at between ~~zero~~0 and 200 percent of the target award. The fair value of the ROCE performance awards is the average market price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

For further details about our stock-based compensation incentive plans and stock awards see Note 15 of the United States Steel Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year-ended December 31, 2018.

~~11.~~ 13. Income Taxes

Tax provision

For the nine months endedSeptember 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018, we recorded a tax ~~provision~~benefit of $3643 million on our pretax ~~earnings~~loss of $~~559~~5 million and a tax provision of $3$36 million on our pretax earnings of ~~$231~~$559 million, respectively. ~~Included~~The tax provision in both periods reflects a benefit for percentage depletion in excess of cost depletion from iron ore that we produce and consume or sell. In 2018, the tax provision ~~in the first nine months of 2018 is~~also reflects a tax benefit for the release of a portion of the ~~domestic~~ valuation allowance due to pretax income. Included in the tax provision in the first nine months of 2017 is a benefit of $13 million related to the carryback of certain losses to prior years, as well as a benefit of $25 million related to the Company's intent to claim a refund of Alternative Minimum Tax credits pursuant to a provision in the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act. As a result, the provision recorded in the third quarter of 2017 was immaterial.

The tax provision for the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2018~~ is2019 was based on an estimated annual effective rate, which requires management to make its best estimate of annual pretax income or loss.

~~During~~ For the ~~year, management regularly updates forecasted~~quarters ended June 30, 2019 and September 30, 2019, the Company computed its tax benefit using a discrete period effective tax rate, which reflects the actual taxes attributable to year-to-date earnings and losses, because we determined that a reliable estimate of the expected annual effective tax rate could not be made. A small change in our estimated marginal pretax results for the ~~various countries~~year ended December 31, 2019 could create a large change in ~~which we operate based on changes~~the expected annual effective tax rate. The sensitivity of the effective tax rate was increased by the benefit for percentage depletion in ~~factors such as prices, shipments, product mix, plant operating performance and~~excess of cost ~~estimates. To the extent that actual~~ ~~2018~~ ~~pretax results~~depletion for ~~U.S. and foreign income or loss vary from estimates applied herein, the actual tax provision or benefit recognized in~~ ~~2018~~ ~~could be materially different from the forecasted amount used to estimate the tax provision for the~~ ~~nine months endedSeptember 30, 2018~~.iron ore.

Deferred taxes

Each quarter U. S. Steel analyzes the likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be realized. A valuation allowance is recorded if, based on the weight of all available positive and negative evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset may not be realized.

At September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, U. S. Steel reviewed all available positive and negative evidence and determined that it is more likely than not that ~~all of its net~~certain domestic deferred tax assets may not be realized.

U. S. Steel will continue to monitor the realizability of its deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis taking into consideration, among other items, the uncertainty regarding the Company's continued ability to generate domestic income in the near term. In the future, if we determine that realization is more likely than not for deferred tax assets with a valuation allowance, the related valuation allowance will be reduced, and we will record a non-cash benefit to earnings.

Unrecognized tax benefits

Unrecognized tax benefits are the differences between a tax position taken, or expected to be taken, in a tax return and the benefit recognized for accounting purposes pursuant to the guidance in ~~ASC~~Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 740 on income taxes. As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was ~~$40~~$33 millionand ~~$42~~$35 million, respectively. The total amount of net unrecognized tax benefits that, if

recognized, would affect the effective tax rate was $6$2 million as of both September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~.2018.

U. S. Steel records interest related to uncertain tax positions as a part of net interest and other financial costs in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. Any penalties are recognized as part of selling, general and administrative expenses. As of ~~both~~ September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018, U. S. Steel had accrued liabilities of $6$1 millionand $2 million for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax ~~positions.~~positions, respectively.

It is reasonably expected that during the next 12 months unrecognized tax benefits related to income tax positions will decrease by approximately $32 million.

~~12.~~

14. Earnings and Dividends Per Common Share

(Loss) Earnings Per Share Attributable to United States Steel Corporation Stockholders

Basic (loss) earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.

Diluted (loss) earnings per common share assumes the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock units and performance awards, provided in each case the effect is dilutive.

The computations for basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share from continuing operations are as follows:



	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	2019			2018		2019		2018
(Loss) earnings attributable to United States Steel Corporation stockholders	$	(84	)	$	291	$	38	$	523
Weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands):
Basic	170,801			177,250		171,882		176,815
Effect of stock options, restricted stock units and performance awards	—			1,876		629		1,919
Adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding, diluted	170,801			179,126		172,511		178,734
Basic (loss) earnings per common share	$	(0.49	)	$	1.64	$	0.22	$	2.96
Diluted (loss) earnings per common share	$	(0.49	)	$	1.62	$	0.22	$	2.92

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) 2018 2017 2018 2017
Earnings attributable to United States Steel Corporation stockholders $ 291
$ 147
$ 523
$ 228
Weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands):

Basic 177,250
175,003
176,815
174,684
Effect of stock options, restricted stock units and performance awards 1,876
1,481
1,919
1,652
Adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding, diluted 179,126
176,484
178,734
176,336
Basic earnings per common share $ 1.64
$ 0.84
$ 2.96
$ 1.30
Diluted earnings per common share $ 1.62
$ 0.83
$ 2.92
$ 1.29

The following table summarizes the securities that were antidilutive, and therefore, were not included in the computations of diluted earnings per common share:



	Three Months Ended September 30,		Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In thousands)	2019	2018	2019	2018
Securities granted under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended	4,327	1,671	3,255	1,689

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In thousands) 2018 2017 2018 2017
Securities granted under the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended 1,671
2,679
1,689
1,677

Dividends Paid Per Share

The dividend for each of the first three quarters of ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 was five cents per common share.

~~13.~~ ~~Inventories~~

Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market for last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventories and lower of cost and net realizable value for first-in, first-out (FIFO) method inventories. The LIFO method is the predominant method of inventory costing in the United States. The FIFO method is the predominant inventory costing method in Europe. At ~~September 30, 2018~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2017, the LIFO method accounted for~~ ~~71 percent~~ ~~and~~ ~~75 percent~~ ~~of total inventory values, respectively.~~

(In millions) September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
Raw materials $ 622
$ 527
Semi-finished products 829
796
Finished products 441
356
Supplies and sundry items 58
59
Total $ 1,950
$ 1,738

~~Current acquisition costs were estimated to exceed the above inventory values by~~ ~~$1,024 million~~ ~~and $802 million at~~ ~~September 30, 2018~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2017, respectively. As a result of the liquidation of LIFO inventories, cost of sales decreased and earnings before interest and income taxes increased by~~ ~~$4 million~~ ~~for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively. The impact from the liquidation of LIFO inventories was immaterial for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.~~

~~Inventory includes~~ ~~$39 million~~ ~~and~~ ~~$42 million~~ ~~of land held for residential/commercial development as of~~ ~~September 30, 2018~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2017, respectively.~~

~~14.~~ 15. Derivative Instruments

U. S. Steel is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks in our European operations. USSE’s revenues are primarily in euros and costs are primarily in euros and U.S. ~~dollars (USD).~~dollars. U. S. Steel uses foreign exchange forward sales contracts (foreign exchange forwards) with maturities no longer than 12 months to exchange euros for ~~USD~~U.S. dollars to manage our currency requirements and exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. Derivative instruments are required to be recognized at fair value in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. U. S. Steel ~~has~~did not ~~elected~~designate euro foreign exchange forwards entered into prior to ~~designate these contracts~~July 1, 2019, as ~~hedges. Therefore,~~hedges; therefore, changes in their fair value ~~are~~were recognized immediately in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Operations.~~Operations (mark-to-market accounting). For those contracts, U. S. Steel will continue to recognize changes in fair value immediately through earnings until the contracts mature. U. S. Steel elected cash flow hedge accounting for euro foreign exchange forwards prospectively effective July 1, 2019. Accordingly, future gains and losses for euro foreign exchange forwards entered into after July 1, 2019 will be recorded within accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) until the related contract impacts earnings. We mitigate the risk of concentration of counterparty credit risk by purchasing our forwards from several counterparties.

~~During the three months ended September 30,~~In 2018, U. S. Steel entered into long-term freight contracts in its domestic operations that require payment in Canadian dollars (CAD). We entered into foreign exchange forward ~~sales~~ contracts with remaining maturities up to ~~three years~~

15 months to exchange USD for CAD to mitigate a portion of the related risk of exchange rate fluctuations and to manage our currency requirements. We elected to designate these contracts as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, we record gains and losses on these contracts within accumulated other comprehensive income until the related contract impacts earnings. The impact related to these contracts was not material to our financial results for the three months ended September 30, 2018.

~~From time to time~~ U. S. Steel may use fixed-price forward physical purchase contracts to partially manage our exposure to price risk related to the purchases of natural gas, zinc and tin used in the production process. Generally, forward physical purchase contracts qualify for the normal purchase and normal sales exceptions described in ASC Topic 815 and are not subject to mark-to-market accounting. U. S. Steel also uses financial swaps to protect from the commodity price risk associated with purchases of natural gas, zinc and tin (commodity purchase swaps). ~~Commodity~~We elected cash flow hedge accounting for domestic commodity purchase swaps ~~did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial results~~ and ~~were classified as cash flow hedges in prior periods (their impacts are included~~use mark-to-market accounting for commodity purchase swaps used in our ~~expanded tabular disclosure below). Effective January 1, 2018, U. S. Steel adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-12,~~ ~~Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements~~European operations.

From time to ~~Accounting for Hedging Activities. The cumulative effect of the adoption of ASU 2017-12 was not material to U. S. Steel's~~time, we enter into financial ~~results. See Note 3 for additional information on the recently adopted accounting standard.~~

~~Financial~~ swaps that are ~~also~~ used to partially manage the sales price of certain hot-rolled coil and iron ore pellet ~~contract~~ sales (sales swaps). ~~In prior periods, we did not elect~~We elected cash flow hedge accounting for ~~these financial swaps and changes in their fair value were immediately recognized in earnings. Effective January 1, 2018, U. S. Steel elected to designate its~~ hot-rolled coil sales swaps ~~as cash flow hedges. See the tabular disclosure below~~effective January 1, 2018 and for ~~further details.~~iron ore pellet sales swaps effective January 1, 2019.

In accordance with the guidance in ASC Topic 820 on fair value measurements and disclosures, the fair value of our foreign exchange forwards, commodity purchase swaps and sales swaps was determined using Level 2 inputs, which are defined as "significant other observable" inputs. The inputs used are from market sources that aggregate data based upon market transactions.

The table below shows the outstanding swap quantities used to hedge forecasted purchases and sales as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and September 30, ~~2017:~~2018:



Hedge Contracts	Classification	September 30, 2019		September 30, 2018
Natural gas (in mmbtus)	Commodity purchase swaps	56,873,000		12,345,000
Tin (in metric tons)	Commodity purchase swaps	530		470
Zinc (in metric tons)	Commodity purchase swaps	14,561		13,886
Hot-rolled coils (in tons)	Sales swaps	—		38,000
Foreign currency (in millions of euros)	Foreign exchange forwards	€	316	€	275
Foreign currency (in millions of CAD)	Foreign exchange forwards	C$	33	C$	58

Hedge Contracts Classification September 30, 2018 September 30, 2017
Natural gas (in mmbtus) Commodity purchase swaps 12,345,000
24,142,500
Tin (in metric tons) Commodity purchase swaps 470
320
Zinc (in metric tons) Commodity purchase swaps 13,886
16,716
Hot-rolled coils (in tons) Sales swaps 38,000
122,000
Iron ore pellets (in metric tons) Sales swaps —
225,000
Foreign currency (in millions of euros) Foreign exchange forwards € 275
€ 222
Foreign currency (in millions of CAD) Foreign exchange forwards C$ 58
C$ —

The following summarizes the fair value amounts included in our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017:~~2018:



(In millions) Designated as Hedging Instruments	Balance Sheet Location	September 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Sales swaps	Accounts payable	$	—	$	1
Commodity purchase swaps	Accounts receivable	3		2
Commodity purchase swaps	Accounts payable	14		17
Commodity purchase swaps	Investments and long-term receivables	1		—
Commodity purchase swaps	Other long-term liabilities	8		1
Foreign exchange forwards	Accounts receivable	3		—
Foreign exchange forwards	Accounts payable	1		1
Foreign exchange forwards	Other long-term liabilities	—		1

Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange forwards	Accounts receivable	9		12

(In millions) Designated as Hedging Instruments Balance Sheet Location September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
Sales swaps Accounts payable $ 6
$ —
Commodity purchase swaps Accounts receivable 1
4
Commodity purchase swaps Accounts payable 9
2
Commodity purchase swaps Investments and long-term receivables —
1
Commodity purchase swaps Other long-term liabilities —
1

Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Sales swaps Accounts payable —
2
Commodity purchase swaps Accounts payable —
1
Foreign exchange forwards Accounts receivable 12
—
Foreign exchange forwards Accounts payable —
11

The table below summarizes the effect of hedge accounting on ~~Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI)~~AOCI and amounts reclassified from AOCI into earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017:~~2018:


	Gain (Loss) on Derivatives in AOCI					Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income						Gain (Loss) on Derivatives in AOCI						Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
(In millions)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018		Three Months Ended September 30, 2017		Location of Reclassification from AOCI ^(a)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018			Three Months Ended September 30, 2017			Three Months Ended September 30, 2019			Three Months Ended September 30, 2018		Location of Reclassification from AOCI ^(a)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2019			Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
Sales swaps ^(b)	$	6	$	—	Net sales	$	(6	)	$	—		$	—		$	6	Net sales	$	—		$	(6	)
Commodity purchase swaps	—		8		Cost of sales ^(c)	(4		)	(2		)	(6		)	—		Cost of sales ^(c)	(4		)	(4		)
Foreign exchange forwards												3			—		Cost of sales	—			—

^(a) The earnings impact of our hedging instruments substantially offsets the earnings impact of the related hedged items since ineffectiveness is less than $1 million.

^(b)U. S. Steel has elected hedge accounting prospectively for ~~hot-rolled coil sales swaps prospectively on January 1, 2018. Iron~~iron ore pellet sales swaps ~~were not classified as hedges.~~on January 1, 2019.

^(c) Costs for commodity purchase swaps are recognized in cost of sales as products are sold.


	Gain (Loss) on Derivatives in AOCI						Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income						Gain (Loss) on Derivatives in AOCI							Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
(In millions)	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017		Location of Reclassification from AOCI ^(a)	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018			Location of Reclassification from AOCI ^(a)	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
Sales swaps ^(b)	$	(6	)	$	—	Net sales	$	(9	)	$	—		$	1		$	(6	)	Net sales	$	(1	)	$	(9	)
Commodity purchase swaps	(7		)	5		Cost of sales ^(c)	(3		)	(5		)	(2		)	(7		)	Cost of sales ^(c)	(14		)	(3		)
Foreign exchange forwards													4			—			Cost of sales	—			—

^(a) The earnings impact of our hedging instruments substantially offsets the earnings impact of the related hedged items since ineffectiveness is less than $1 million.

^(c) Costs for commodity purchase swaps are recognized in cost of sales as products are sold.

~~The table below summarizes the impact of derivative activity~~For euro foreign exchange forward derivatives where hedge accounting ~~has~~was not ~~been~~ elected, ~~on our Consolidated Statements~~there were gains of ~~Operations for~~$11 million and $5 million in the ~~three and nine months~~three-month periods ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and ~~2017:~~

Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
(In millions) Consolidated Statement of Operations Location Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Sales swaps ^(a)
Net sales $ —
$ 5
Foreign exchange forwards ^(b)
Other financial costs 5
(7 )

^(a)~~U. S. Steel has elected~~gains of $18 million in both the first nine months of 2019 and 2018, respectively, recognized in other financial costs. There were no other material impacts for derivatives where hedge accounting ~~for hot-rolled coil sales swaps prospectively on January 1, 2018. Iron ore pellet sales swaps were~~was not ~~classified as hedges.~~elected.

^(b)~~U. S. Steel has elected hedge accounting for foreign exchange forwards to exchange USD for CAD. Foreign exchange forwards to exchange euro for USD were not classified as hedges.~~

Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
(In millions) Consolidated Statement of Operations Location Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
Sales swaps ^(a)
Net sales $ —
$ 7
Commodity purchase swaps Cost of sales —
3
Foreign exchange forwards ^(b)
Other financial costs 18
(20 )

^(a)~~U. S. Steel has elected hedge accounting for hot-rolled coil sales swaps prospectively on January 1, 2018. Iron ore pellet sales swaps were not classified as hedges.~~

^(b)~~U. S. Steel has elected hedge accounting for foreign exchange forwards to exchange USD for CAD. Foreign exchange forwards to exchange euro for USD were not classified as hedges.~~

At current contract values, ~~$8 million and $6~~$9 million currently in AOCI as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 will be recognized as an increase in cost of sales ~~and a decrease in net sales, respectively,~~ over the next year as related hedged items are recognized in earnings. The maximum derivative contract duration for commodity purchase swaps is ~~14 months and the maximum duration~~27 months. There are 0 outstanding contracts for sales ~~swaps is 3 months.~~swaps.

~~15.~~ ~~Debt~~

(In millions)
Interest
Rates %
Maturity September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
2037 Senior Notes 6.650 2037 $ 350
$ 350
2026 Senior Notes 6.250 2026 650
—
2025 Senior Notes 6.875 2025 750
750
2021 Senior Secured Notes 8.375 2021 —
780
2020 Senior Notes 7.375 2020 356
432
Environmental Revenue Bonds 5.750 - 6.875 2019 - 2042 400
400
Fairfield Caster Lease 2022 23
24
Other capital leases and all other obligations 2019 1
1
Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement Variable 2023 —
—
USSK Credit Agreement Variable 2023 —
—
USSK credit facilities Variable 2018 —
—
Total Debt 2,530
2,737
Less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs 28
34
Less short-term debt and long-term debt due within one year 4
3
Long-term debt $ 2,498
$ 2,700

16. Debt



(In millions)	Interest Rates %	Maturity	September 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
2037 Senior Notes	6.650	2037	$	350	$	350
2026 Senior Notes	6.250	2026	650		650
2025 Senior Notes	6.875	2025	750		750
Environmental Revenue Bonds	5.750 - 6.875	2019 - 2042	400		400
Fairfield Caster Lease		2022	20		22
Other finance leases and all other obligations		2019 - 2029	40		6
Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement	Variable	2023	—		—
USSK Credit Agreement	Variable	2023	381		229
USSK credit facilities	Variable	2021	—		—
Total Debt			2,591		2,407
Less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs			24		26
Less short-term debt and long-term debt due within one year			67		65
Long-term debt			$	2,500	$	2,316

To the extent not otherwise discussed below, information concerning the senior notes and other listed obligations can be found in Note 1617 of the audited financial statements in the United States Steel Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2017.~~

~~Senior Note Repurchases~~

Through a series of open market purchases, U. S. Steel repurchased approximately $75 million of its 7.375% Senior Notes due 2020 at a weighted average price of 107.119 percent of par during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

~~Senior Secured Note Tender and Redemption~~

In March 2018, pursuant to a cash tender offer, U. S. Steel repurchased approximately $499 million aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 8.375% Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (2021 Senior Secured Notes). The aggregate cash outflow from the tender was approximately $538 million, which included $39 million in premiums. The remaining approximately $281 million aggregate principal amount of 2021 Senior Secured Notes was redeemed on April 12, 2018. The aggregate cash flow from the redemption was $302 million, which included $21 million in premiums.

~~Issuance of Senior Notes due 2026~~

In March 2018, U. S. Steel issued $650 million aggregate principal amount of 6.250% Senior Notes due March 15, 2026 (2026 Senior Notes). U. S. Steel received net proceeds from the offering of approximately $640 million after fees of approximately $10 million related to the underwriting and third-party expenses. The net proceeds from the issuance of the 2026 Senior Notes, together with cash on hand, were used to tender or otherwise redeem all of our 2021 Senior Secured Notes as discussed above.

The 2026 Senior Notes are senior and unsecured obligations that rank equally in right of payment with all of our other existing and future senior and unsecured indebtedness. U. S. Steel will pay interest on the notes semi-annually in arrears on March 15th and September 15th of each year, commencing on September 15, 2018.

Similar to our other senior notes, the indenture governing the 2026 Senior Notes restricts our ability to create certain liens, to enter into sale leaseback transactions and to consolidate, merge, transfer or sell all, or

substantially all of our assets. It also contains provisions requiring the purchase of the 2026 Senior Notes upon a change of control under certain specified circumstances, as well as other customary provisions.

U. S. Steel may redeem the 2026 Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at our option at any time, or from time to time, on or after March 15, 2021 at the redemption price for such notes set forth below as a percentage of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding the redemption date, if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning March 15 of the years indicated below:

Year Redemption Price
2021 103.125 %
2022 101.563 %
2023 and thereafter 100.000 %

At any time prior to March 15, 2021, U. S. Steel may also redeem up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the 2026 Senior Notes at 106.25%, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, but excluding the applicable date of redemption, with proceeds from equity offerings.

~~Fourth~~ Amended and Restated Credit Agreement

~~On February 26, 2018, U. S. Steel entered into~~As of September 30, 2019, there were 0 amounts drawn under the $1.5 billion Fourth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (Credit Facility Agreement)~~, replacing the Company's Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Credit Facility Agreement maintains the facility size of $1.5 billion and extends the maturity date to 2023.~~

~~As of~~ ~~September 30, 2018, there were~~ no ~~amounts drawn under the $1.5 billion Credit Facility Agreement.~~. U. S. Steel must maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.00 to 1.00 for the most recent four consecutive quarters when availability under the Credit Facility Agreement is less than the greater of 10 percent of the total aggregate commitments and $150 million. Based on the most recent four quarters as of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, we would not have met this covenant. ~~If we are unable to meet this covenant in future periods,~~As a result, the amount available to the Company under this facility ~~would~~will be reduced by $150 ~~million.~~million and the availability under the Credit Facility Agreement was $1.35 billion as of September 30, 2019.

The Credit Facility Agreement provides for borrowings at interest rates based on defined, short-term market rates plus a spread based on availability and includes other customary terms and conditions including restrictions on our ability to create certain liens and to consolidate, merge or transfer all, or substantially all, of our assets. The Credit Facility Agreement expires in February 2023. Maturity may be accelerated 91 days prior to the stated maturity of any outstanding senior debt if excess cash and credit facility availability do not meet the liquidity conditions set forth in the Credit Facility Agreement. Borrowings are secured by liens on certain North American inventory and trade accounts receivable.

On October 25, 2019, we entered into a new five-year senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount up to $2.0 billion (Fifth Credit Facility Agreement) to replace the existing Credit Facility Agreement. The Fifth Credit Facility Agreement has substantially the same terms as the existing Credit Facility Agreement, except the Fifth Credit Facility Agreement will mature five years from the date of effectiveness, includes a “first-in, last-out” tranche in an amount up to $150 million and includes certain other changes, including changes to the fixed charge coverage ratio allowing us to exclude (i) certain capital expenditures from the calculation of the ratio and (ii) any restricted payments made pursuant to any share repurchase program from the calculation of "consolidated fixed charges." On October 30, 2019, we drew $700 million on the Fifth Credit Facility Agreement to fund the closing of our acquisition of a 49.9% interest in Big River Steel.

U. S. Steel Košice (USSK) credit facilities

OnAt September ~~26, 2018,~~30, 2019, USSK ~~and one~~had borrowings of €350 million (approximately $381 million) under its ~~wholly owned subsidiaries, as guarantor, entered into a~~ €460 million (approximately $501 million) unsecured revolving credit facility (USSK Credit Agreement), replacing USSK's €200 million revolving credit facility (Prior Facility). The USSK Credit Agreement has a maturity date of September 26, 2023 and contains terms and conditions substantially similar to the Prior Facility. Concurrent with the execution of the USSK Credit Agreement, USSK reduced the size of a separate €40 million unsecured credit facility to €20 million.

At ~~September 30, 2018, USSK had no borrowings under its~~ ~~€460 million~~ ~~(approximately~~ ~~$533 million) USSK Credit Agreement.~~facility. The USSK Credit Agreement contains

certain USSK financial covenants, including a maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio and a minimum stockholders' equity to assets ratio. The covenants are measured semi-annually for the period covering the last twelve calendar months and calculated as set forth in the USSK Credit Agreement. If USSK does not comply with the USSK Credit Agreement financial covenants, it may not draw on the facility until the next measurement date, outstanding borrowings may be accelerated, or the margin on outstanding borrowings may be increased. At September 30, ~~2018~~,2019, USSK had ~~full~~ availability of €110 million (approximately $120 million) under the USSK Credit Agreement. ~~On October 15, 2018, USSK drew down €200 million (approximately $232 million) from its USSK Credit Agreement (See Note 25).~~

At September 30, ~~2018~~,2019, USSK had no0 borrowings under its ~~€20~~€20 million and €10 million unsecured credit facilities (collectively, approximately ~~$35~~$33 million) and the availability was approximately ~~$33~~$32 million due to approximately $2$1 million of customs and other guarantees outstanding. ~~The €20 million credit facility expires in December~~

~~2018. Currently, the €10 million credit facility also expires in December 2018, but can be extended one additional year to the final maturity date at the mutual consent of USSK and its lender.~~

Each of these facilities bear interest at the applicable inter-bank offer rate plus a margin and contain customary terms and conditions.

Environmental Revenue Bonds

On October 10, 2019, we launched offerings of 2 series of environmental revenue bonds in aggregate principal amount of approximately $368 million, that will mature between 2024 and 2049 (collectively, the “2019 Environmental Revenue Bonds”). Proceeds of the 2019 Environmental Revenue Bonds in the amount of approximately $93 million will be used to redeem a portion of our existing outstanding environmental revenue bonds for which we issued a conditional redemption notice. Proceeds of the 2019 Environmental Revenue Bonds in the amount of $275 million will be used to finance or refinance the acquisition, construction, equipping and installation of certain solid waste disposal facilities, including an electric arc furnace and other equipment and facilities at the Company’s Fairfield Works. The 2019 Environmental Revenue Bonds closed on October 25, 2019.

2026 Senior Convertible Notes

On October 21, 2019, U. S. Steel issued an aggregate principal amount of $300 million of 5.00% Senior Convertible Notes due November 1, 2026 (2026 Senior Convertible Notes), with a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional $50 million in aggregate principal amount of 2026 Senior Convertible Notes, on the same terms and conditions. On October 25, 2019, U. S. Steel issued an additional $50 million of 2026 Senior Convertible Notes after the full option was exercised. U. S. Steel received net proceeds of approximately $340 million from the sale of the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes after deducting underwriting fees and estimated offering expenses. The Company intends to use the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including, without limitation, for previously announced strategic investments and capital expenditures. Interest on the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing on May 1, 2020.

Prior to August 1, 2026, holders of notes may convert all or a portion of their notes at their option only upon the satisfaction of specified conditions and during certain periods. On or after August 1, 2026, holders may convert all or a portion of their notes at any time prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date. Upon conversion, we will satisfy the obligation with cash, common stock, or a combination thereof, at our election. U. S. Steel may not redeem the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes prior to November 5, 2023. On or after November 5, 2023 and prior to August 1, 2026, if the price per share of U. S. Steel's common stock has been at least 130% of the conversion price for specified periods, U. S. Steel may redeem all or a portion of the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes at a cash redemption price of 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

If U. S. Steel undergoes a fundamental change, as defined in the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes, holders may require us to repurchase the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes in whole or in part for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest (including additional interest, if any) up to, but excluding the repurchase date.

For accounting purposes, the proceeds received from the issuance of the notes will be allocated between debt and equity to reflect the fair value of the conversion option embedded in the notes and the fair value of similar debt without the conversion option. As a result, based on the aggregate principal amount of $350 million, we estimate that we will record approximately $106 million of the gross proceeds of the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes as an increase in additional paid-in capital with the offsetting amount recorded as a debt discount. The debt discount will be amortized over the term of the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes using an estimated interest

rate of 10.5% (the estimated effective borrowing rate for nonconvertible debt at the time of issuance) which will accrete the carrying value of the notes to the principal amount at maturity.

Change in control event

If there is a change in control of U. S. Steel, the following may occur: (a) debt obligations totaling ~~$2,106~~$2,131 million as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 may be declared due and payable; (b) the Credit Facility Agreement and the USSK credit facilities may be terminated and any amounts outstanding declared due and payable; and (c) U. S. Steel may be required to either purchase the leased Fairfield Works slab caster for approximately $2421 million or provide a letter of credit to secure the remaining obligation.

~~16.~~ 17. Asset Retirement Obligations

U. S. Steel’s asset retirement obligations (AROs) primarily relate to mine, landfill closure and post-closure costs. The following table reflects changes in the carrying values of AROs:



(In millions)	September 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
Balance at beginning of year	$	60		$	69
Obligations settled	(7		)	(12		)
Accretion expense	2			3
Balance at end of period	$	55		$	60

(In millions) September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
Balance at beginning of year $ 69
$ 79

Obligations settled (7 ) (8 )
Change in estimate of obligations
—

(6 )
Foreign currency translation effects —
2

Accretion expense 2
2

Balance at end of period $ 64
$ 69

Certain AROs related to disposal costs of the majority of fixed assets at our integrated steel facilities have not been recorded because they have an indeterminate settlement date. These AROs will be initially recognized in the period in which sufficient information exists to estimate their fair value.

~~17.~~ 18. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, current accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable, bank checks outstanding, and accrued interest included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet approximate fair value. See Note 1415 for disclosure of U. S. Steel’s derivative instruments, which are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis.

The following table summarizes U. S. Steel’s financial liabilities that were not carried at fair value at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018.


	September 30, 2018				December 31, 2017				September 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
(In millions)	Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount
Financial liabilities:
Long-term debt ^(a)	$	2,501	$	2,478	$	2,851	$	2,678	$	2,229	$	2,452	$	2,182	$	2,353

(a) Excludes ~~capital~~finance lease obligations.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments included in the table above:

Long-term debt: Fair value was determined using Level 2 inputs which were derived from quoted market prices and is based on the yield on public debt where available or current borrowing rates available for financings with similar terms and maturities.

Fair value of the financial liabilities disclosed herein is not necessarily representative of the amount that could be realized or settled, nor does the fair value amount consider the tax consequences of realization or settlement.

Financial guarantees are U. S. Steel’s only unrecognized financial instrument. For details relating to financial guarantees see Note ~~22.~~

23.

~~18.~~

19. Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

The following table reflects the first nine months of 2019 and 2018 reconciliation of the carrying amount of total equity, equity attributable to U. S. Steel and equity attributable to noncontrolling ~~interests~~interests:



Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 (In millions)	Total			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income			Common Stock		Treasury Stock			Paid-in Capital		Non- Controlling Interest
Balance at beginning of year	$	4,203		$	1,212		$	(1,026	)	$	177	$	(78	)	$	3,917	$	1
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net earnings	54			54
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Pension and other benefit adjustments	32						32
Currency translation adjustment	(17		)				(17		)
Derivative financial instruments	15						15
Employee stock plans	2									1		(6		)	7
Common stock repurchased	(42		)									(42		)
Dividends paid on common stock	(9		)	(9		)
Cumulative effect upon adoption of lease accounting standard	(2		)	(2		)
Balance at March 31, 2019	4,236			1,255			(996		)	178		(126		)	3,924		1
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net earnings	68			68
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Pension and other benefit adjustments	32						32
Currency translation adjustment	12						12
Derivative financial instruments	(11		)				(11		)
Employee stock plans	12									1		(1		)	12
Common stock repurchased	(28		)									(28		)
Dividends paid on common stock	(9		)	(9		)
Balance at June 30, 2019	4,312			1,314			(963		)	179		(155		)	3,936		1
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net loss	(84		)	(84		)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Pension and other benefit adjustments	30						30
Currency translation adjustment	(40		)				(40		)
Derivative financial instruments	(2		)				(2		)
Employee stock plans	11														11
Common stock repurchased	(18		)									(18		)
Dividends paid on common stock	(8		)	(8		)
Other	(1		)	(1		)
Balance at September 30, 2019	$	4,200		$	1,221		$	(975	)	$	179	$	(173	)	$	3,947	$	1



Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 (In millions)	Total			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income			Common Stock		Treasury Stock			Paid-in Capital			Non- Controlling Interest
Balance at beginning of year	$	3,321		$	133		$	(845	)	$	176	$	(76	)	$	3,932		$	1
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net earnings	18			18
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Pension and other benefit adjustments	46						46
Currency translation adjustment	40						40
Derivative financial instruments	(16		)				(16		)
Employee stock plans	39									1		75			(37		)
Dividends paid on common stock	(9		)	(9		)
Balance at March 31, 2018	3,439			142			(775		)	177		(1		)	3,895			1
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net earnings	214			214
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Pension and other benefit adjustments	47						47
Currency translation adjustment	(87		)				(87		)
Derivative financial instruments	(3		)				(3		)
Employee stock plans	5														5
Dividends paid on common stock	(9		)	(9		)
Balance at June 30, 2018	3,606			347			(818		)	177		(1		)	3,900			1
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net earnings	291			291
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Pension and other benefit adjustments	50						50
Currency translation adjustment	(10		)				(10		)
Derivative financial instruments	7						7
Employee stock plans	7											(2		)	9
Dividends paid on common stock	(9		)	(9		)
Balance at September 30, 2018	$	3,942		$	629		$	(771	)	$	177	$	(3	)	$	3,909		$	1

20. Reclassifications from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI)



(In millions)	Pension and Other Benefit Items			Foreign Currency Items			Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives			Total
Balance at December 31, 2018	$	(1,416	)	$	403		$	(13	)	$	(1,026	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications	(3		)	(45		)	(12		)	(60		)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI ^(a)	97			—			14			111
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)	94			(45		)	2			51
Balance at September 30, 2019	$	(1,322	)	$	358		$	(11	)	$	(975	)

Balance at December 31, 2017	$	(1,309	)	$	463		$	1		$	(845	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications ^(b)	(6		)	(58		)	1			(63		)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI ^(a)(b)	149			—			(12		)	137
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)	143			(58		)	(11		)	74
Balance at September 30, 2018	$	(1,166	)	$	405		$	(10	)	$	(771	)

(a)See table below for further details.

(b)The Company previously disclosed in Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2018, an increase to AOCI of $292 million in the Other comprehensive income before reclassifications line item and a decrease to AOCI of $149 million in the Amounts reclassified from AOCI line item for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 amounts for Pension and ~~2017:~~Other Benefit Items. These amounts should have been disclosed as a decrease to AOCI of $6 million and an increase to AOCI of $149 million, respectively, which have been corrected in the table above. The Company concluded that the errors were not material to the financial statements of any prior annual or interim period and therefore, amendments of previously filed reports are not required. The revision had no impact on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows or the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). Quarterly periods not presented herein will be revised, as applicable, in future filings.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 (In millions) Total Retained Earnings Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income Common
Stock Treasury
Stock Paid-in
Capital Non-
Controlling
Interest
Balance at beginning of year $ 3,321
$ 133
$ (845 ) $ 176
$ (76 ) $ 3,932
$ 1
Comprehensive income (loss):

Net earnings 523
523

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

Pension and other benefit adjustments 143

143

Currency translation adjustment (58 )
(58 )

Derivative financial instruments (11 ) (11 )
Employee stock plans 51

1
73
(23 )
Dividends paid on common stock (27 ) (27 )

Balance at September 30, 2018 $ 3,942
$ 629
$ (771 ) $ 177
$ (3 ) $ 3,909
$ 1



		Amount reclassified from AOCI ^(c)
		Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In millions)	Details about AOCI components	2019			2018			2019			2018
	Amortization of pension and other benefit items
	Prior service costs ^(a)	$	8		$	7		$	23		$	22
	Actuarial losses ^(a)	33			39			101			117
	Settlement, termination and curtailment losses ^(a)	3			10			3			10
	Total pensions and other benefits items	44			56			127			149
	Derivative reclassifications from AOCI	5			(11		)	19			(12		)
	Total before tax	49			45			146			137
	Tax benefit ^(b)	(12		)	—			(35		)	—
	Net of tax	$	37		$	45		$	111		$	137

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 (In millions) Total Accumulated Deficit Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income Common
Stock Treasury
Stock Paid-in
Capital Non-
Controlling
Interest
Balance at beginning of year $ 2,275
$ (250 ) $ (1,497 ) $ 176
$ (182 ) $ 4,027
$ 1
Comprehensive income (loss):

Net earnings 228
228

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

Pension and other benefit adjustments 146

146

Currency translation adjustment 149

149

Derivative financial instruments 6
6

Employee stock plans 26

90
(64 )
Dividends paid on common stock (26 )

(26 )
Other 4
4

Balance at September 30, 2017 $ 2,808
$ (18 ) $ (1,196 ) $ 176
$ (92 ) $ 3,937
$ 1

~~19.~~ ~~Reclassifications from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI)~~

(In millions) ^(a)
Pension and
Other Benefit
Items Foreign
Currency
Items Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Total
Balance at December 31, 2017 $ (1,309 ) $ 463
$ 1
$ (845 )
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications 292
(58 ) 1
235
Amounts reclassified from AOCI ^(b)
(149 ) —
(12 ) (161 )
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss) 143
(58 ) (11 ) 74
Balance at September 30, 2018 $ (1,166 ) $ 405
$ (10 ) $ (771 )

(a)~~Amounts do not reflect a tax benefit as a result of a full valuation allowance on our domestic deferred tax assets.~~

~~(b)See table below for further details.~~

Amount reclassified from AOCI
Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In millions) Details about AOCI components 2018 2017 2018 2017
Amortization of pension and other benefit items

Prior service costs ^(a)
$ (7 ) $ (8 ) $ (22 ) $ (22 )

Actuarial losses ^(a)
(39 ) (38 ) (117 ) (114 )

Settlement, termination and
curtailment losses ^(a)
(10 ) (1 ) (10 ) (5 )
Total pensions and other benefits items (56 ) (47 ) (149 ) (141 )
Derivative reclassifications to Consolidated Statements of Operations (11 ) —
(12 ) —
Total before tax (67 ) (47 ) (161 ) (141 )

Tax benefit ^(b)
—
—
—
—
Net of tax $ (67 ) $ (47 ) $ (161 ) $ (141 )

~~(a)~~These AOCI components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost (see Note 810 for additional details).

(b)Amounts in 2018 do not reflect a tax ~~benefit~~provision as a result of a full valuation allowance on our domestic deferred tax assets.

(c)The corrections noted in footnote ^(b) to the table above are consistently reflected in this table.

~~20.~~ 21. Transactions with Related Parties

Net sales to related parties and receivables from related parties primarily reflect sales of raw materials and steel products to equity investees and U. S. Steel Canada Inc. (USSC) after the Canada Companies' Creditor Arrangement Act (CCAA) filing on September 16, 2014, but before the sale to an affiliate of Bedrock Industries Group LLC (Bedrock) on June 30, 2017.investees. Generally, transactions are conducted under long-term contractual arrangements. Related party sales and service transactions were $367 million and $378 million ~~and~~ ~~$272 million~~ for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018, respectively and ~~$1,072~~$1,112 million and ~~$941~~$1,072 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively.

Purchases from related parties for outside processing services provided by equity investees ~~and USSC after the CCAA filing on September 16, 2014, but before the sale to Bedrock,~~ amounted to $7 million and $8 million ~~and~~ ~~$7 million~~ for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018, respectively and $23 million ~~and $62 million~~ for both the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017, respectively.~~2018. Purchases of iron ore pellets from related parties amounted to ~~$23~~$27 millionand$4023 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, and ~~$66~~$78 million and ~~$120~~$66 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017.~~respectively.

Accounts payable to related parties include balances due to PRO-TEC Coating Company, LLC (PRO-TEC) of $~~103~~109 million and $7280 million at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018, respectively for invoicing and receivables collection services provided by U. S. Steel on PRO-TEC's behalf. U. S. Steel, as PRO-TEC’s exclusive sales agent, is responsible for credit risk related to those receivables. U. S. Steel also provides PRO-TEC marketing, selling and customer service functions. Payables to other related parties totaled $32 million and $2$1 million at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018, respectively.

~~21.~~ 22. Restructuring ~~and Other~~ Charges

~~Restructuring charges recorded during~~During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018 were immaterial.~~2019, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $54 million, which consists of charges of $25 million at USSK for headcount reductions and plant exit costs, and $29 million for the intended indefinite idling of our East Chicago Tin operations and our finishing facility in Dearborn, Michigan. Cash payments were made related to severance and exit costs of ~~$18 million.~~

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded a net restructuring charge of $30 million, which consists of charges of $35 million related to the permanent shutdown of the No. 6 Quench & Temper Mill at Lorain Tubular Operations and a favorable adjustment of $5 million primarily associated with a change in estimate for previously recorded environmental costs and Company-wide headcount reductions. Cash payments were made related to severance and exit costs of $24$20 million.

Charges for restructuring ~~and ongoing cost reduction~~ initiatives are recorded in the period U. S. Steel commits to a restructuring ~~or cost reduction~~ plan, or executes specific actions contemplated by the plan and all criteria for liability recognition have been met. Charges ~~related to the~~for restructuring ~~and cost reductions~~ are reported in restructuring ~~and other~~ charges in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The activity in the accrued balances incurred in relation to restructuring ~~and other cost reduction~~ programs during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 were as follows:



(In millions)	Employee Related Costs			Exit Costs			Non-cash Charges^(a)			Total
Balance at December 31, 2018	$	—		$	17		$	—		$	17
Additional charges	28			9			17			54
Cash payments/utilization	(14		)	(6		)	(17		)	(37		)
Balance at September 30, 2019	$	14		$	20		$	—		$	34

Employee Related Exit
(in millions) Costs Costs Total
Balance at December 31, 2017 $ 4
$ 34
$ 38
Cash payments/utilization (3 ) (15 ) (18 )
Balance at September 30, 2018 $ 1
$ 19
$ 20
^(a)Non-cash charges primarily relate to accelerated depreciation associated with the intended indefinite idling of our ECT operations and Dearborn, Michigan finishing facility.

Accrued liabilities for restructuring ~~and other cost reduction~~ programs are included in the following balance sheet lines:


(in millions)	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
(In millions)					September 30, 2019
Accounts payable	$	11	$	26	$	14
Payroll and benefits payable	1		4		14
Deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities	8		8		6
Total	$	20	$	38	$	34

~~22.~~ 23. Contingencies and Commitments

U. S. Steel is the subject of, or party to, a number of pending or threatened legal actions, contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters, including laws and regulations relating to the environment. Certain of these matters are discussed below. The ultimate resolution of these contingencies could, individually or in the aggregate, be material to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. However, management believes that U. S. Steel will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably.

U. S. Steel accrues for estimated costs related to existing lawsuits, claims and proceedings when it is probable that it will incur these costs in the future and the costs are reasonably estimable.

Asbestos matters– As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019, U. S. Steel was a defendant in approximately ~~750~~796 active cases involving approximately ~~2,300~~2,380 plaintiffs. The vast majority of these cases involve multiple defendants. ~~At December 31, 2017, U. S. Steel was a defendant in approximately 820 cases involving approximately 3,315 plaintiffs. As of September 30, 2018, about~~ About 1,540,, or approximately 6765 percent,, of these plaintiff claims are currently pending in jurisdictions which permit filings with massive numbers of plaintiffs. At December 31, 2018, U. S. Steel was a defendant in approximately 755 cases involving approximately 2,320 plaintiffs. Based upon U. S. Steel’s experience in such cases, ~~we believe~~it believes that the actual number of plaintiffs who ultimately assert claims against U. S. Steel will likely be a small fraction of the total number of plaintiffs.

The following table shows the number of asbestos claims in the current period and the prior three years:



Period ended	Opening Number of Claims	Claims Dismissed, Settled and Resolved ^(a)	New Claims	Closing Number of Claims
December 31, 2016	3,315	225	250	3,340
December 31, 2017	3,340	275	250	3,315
December 31, 2018	3,315	1,285	290	2,320
September 30, 2019	2,320	150	210	2,380

Period ended Opening
Number
of Claims
Claims
Dismissed,
Settled
and Resolved (a)
New
Claims Closing
Number
of Claims
December 31, 2015 3,455 415 275 3,315
December 31, 2016 3,315 225 250 3,340
December 31, 2017 3,340 275 250 3,315
September 30, 2018 3,315 1,225 210 2,300

(a) The period ending ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2018 includes approximately 1,000 dismissed cases previously pending in the State of Texas.

Historically, asbestos-related claims against U. S. Steel fall into ~~three~~3 groups: (1) claims made by persons who allegedly were exposed to asbestos on the premises of U. S. Steel facilities; (2) claims made by persons allegedly exposed to products manufactured by U. S. Steel; and (3) claims made under certain federal and maritime laws by employees of former operations of U. S. Steel.

The amount U. S. Steel accrues for pending asbestos claims is not material to U. S. Steel’s financial condition. However, U. S. Steel is unable to estimate the ultimate outcome of asbestos-related claims due to a number of uncertainties, including: (1) the rates at which new claims are filed, (2) the number of and effect of bankruptcies of other companies traditionally defending asbestos claims, (3) uncertainties associated with the variations in the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, (4) uncertainties regarding the facts, circumstances and disease process with each claim, and (5) any new legislation enacted to address asbestos-related claims.

Further, U. S. Steel does not believe that an accrual for unasserted claims is required. At any given reporting date, it is probable that there are unasserted claims that will be filed against the Company in the future. In 2018, the Company engaged an outside valuation consultant to assist in assessing its ability to estimate an accrual for unasserted claims. This assessment was based on the Company's settlement experience, including recent claims trends. The analysis focused on settlements made over the last several years as these claims are likely to best represent future claim characteristics. After review by the valuation consultant and U. S. Steel management, it was determined that the Company could not estimate an accrual for unasserted claims.

Despite these uncertainties, management believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on U. S. Steel’s financial ~~condition, although the resolution of such matters could significantly impact results of operations for a particular quarter.~~condition.

Environmental matters– U. S. Steel is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment. These laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites. Penalties may be imposed for noncompliance. Changes in accrued liabilities for remediation activities where U. S. Steel is identified as a named party are summarized in the following table:



(In millions)	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019
Beginning of period	$	187
Accruals for environmental remediation deemed probable and reasonably estimable	6
Obligations settled	(17		)
End of period	$	176

(In millions) Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
Beginning of period $ 179
Accruals for environmental remediation deemed probable and reasonably estimable 2
Obligations settled (4 )
End of period $ 177

Accrued liabilities for remediation activities are included in the following Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet lines:



(In millions)	September 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Accounts payable	$	41	$	37
Deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities	135		150
Total	$	176	$	187

(In millions) September 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
Accounts payable $ 30
$ 29
Deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities 147
150
Total $ 177
$ 179

Expenses related to remediation are recorded in cost of sales and were immaterial for both the three and nine-month periods ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and September 30, ~~2017.~~2018. It is not currently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed. Due to uncertainties inherent in remediation projects and the associated liabilities, it is reasonably possible that total remediation costs for active matters may exceed the accrued liabilities by as much as 15 to 30 percent.

Remediation Projects

U. S. Steel is involved in environmental remediation projects at or adjacent to several current and former U. S. Steel facilities and other locations that are in various stages of completion ranging from initial characterization through post-closure monitoring. Based on the anticipated scope and degree of uncertainty of projects, we categorize projects as follows:

(1)

Projects with Ongoing Study and Scope Development - Projects which are still in the development phase. For these projects, the extent of remediation that may be required is not yet known, the remediation methods and plans are not yet developed, and/or cost estimates cannot be determined. Therefore, significant costs, in addition to the accrued liabilities for these projects, are reasonably possible. There are ~~six~~6 environmental remediation projects where additional costs for completion are not currently estimable, but could be material. These projects are at Fairfield Works, Lorain Tubular, USS-POSCO Industries (UPI), the Fairless Plant, ~~Cherryvale Zinc~~Gary Works and the former steelmaking plant at Joliet, Illinois. As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, accrued liabilities for these projects totaled $1$2 million for the costs of studies, investigations, interim measures, design and/or remediation. It is reasonably possible that additional liabilities associated with future requirements regarding studies, investigations, design and remediation for these projects could be as much as $30 million to ~~$50~~$45 million.

(2)

Significant Projects with Defined Scope - Projects with significant accrued liabilities with a defined scope. As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, there are ~~three~~4 significant projects with defined scope greater than or equal to $5 million each, with a total accrued liability of ~~$134~~$130 million. These projects are Gary Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) (accrued liability of ~~$26~~$25 million), the former Geneva facility (accrued liability of ~~$62~~$50 million), the Cherryvale zinc site (accrued liability of $10 million) and the former Duluth facility St. Louis River Estuary (accrued liability of ~~$46~~$45 million).

(3)

Other Projects with a Defined Scope - Projects with relatively small accrued liabilities for which we believe that, while additional costs are possible, they are not likely to be significant, and also include those projects for which we do not yet possess sufficient information to estimate potential costs to U. S. Steel. There are ~~two~~2 other environmental remediation projects which each had an accrued liability of between $1 million and $5 million. The total accrued liability for these projects at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 was $4 million. These projects have progressed through a significant portion of the design phase and material additional costs are not expected.

The remaining environmental remediation projects each have an accrued liability of less than $1 million each. The total accrued liability for these projects at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 was approximately $64 million. We do not foresee material additional liabilities for any of these sites.

Post-Closure Costs – Accrued liabilities for post-closure site monitoring and other costs at various closed landfills totaled $22 million at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and were based on known scopes of work.

Administrative and Legal Costs – As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019, U. S. Steel had an accrued liability of $89 million for administrative and legal costs related to environmental remediation projects. These accrued liabilities were based on projected administrative and legal costs for the next three years and do not change significantly from year to year.

Capital Expenditures – For a number of years, U. S. Steel has made substantial capital expenditures to ~~bring existing facilities into compliance~~comply with various regulations, laws and other requirements relating to the environment. In the first nine months of ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~,2018, such capital expenditures totaled ~~$55~~$40 million and ~~$39~~$55 million, respectively. U. S. Steel anticipates making additional such expenditures in the ~~future;~~future, which may be material; however, the exact amounts and timing of such expenditures are uncertain because of the continuing evolution of specific regulatory requirements.

EU Environmental Requirements - Under the ~~Emission~~Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), USSK's final allocation of ~~free~~ allowances for the Phase III period, which covers the years 2013 through 2020 is 48 million allowances. ~~We estimate a shortfall of approximately 16 million allowances for the Phase III period.~~ Based on projected ~~future~~total production levels, we started to purchase allowances in the third quarter of 2017 to meet the annual compliance submission in the future. As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, we have purchased approximately 1012 million European Union Allowances totaling ~~€101~~€132 million (approximately ~~$117~~$144 million). ~~However, due to a number of variables such as~~We estimate that the ~~future market value of~~total shortfall will be approximately 12 million allowances ~~future production levels and future emissions intensity levels, we cannot reliably estimate~~for the Phase III period. Although the full cost of complying with the ETS regulations depends on future production levels and future emissions intensity levels, at this ~~time.~~time we do not believe that the cost for the Phase III period will be significantly different from the costs we have already incurred.

The EU’s ~~Industry Emission~~Industrial Emissions Directive requires implementation of EU determined best available techniques (BAT) for Iron and Steel production to reduce environmental impacts as well as compliance with BAT associated

emission levels. Our most recent broad estimate of future capital expenditures for projects ~~that~~to comply with or go beyond BAT requirements is €138 million (approximately ~~$160 million~~)$150 million) over the 2017 to 2020 program period. ~~In order to receive full grant amounts~~These costs may be mitigated if USSK ~~is required to comply~~complies with certain financial covenants, which are assessed annually. USSK complied with these covenants as of September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. If we are unable to meet these covenants in the future, USSK might be required to provide additional collateral (e.g. bank guarantee) to secure the full value of estimated expenditures. There could be increased operating costs associated with these projects, such as increased energy and maintenance costs. We are currently unable to reliably estimate what the increase in operating costs will be as many projects are in the development stage.

Environmental indemnifications – Throughout its history, U. S. Steel has sold numerous properties and businesses and many of these sales included indemnifications and cost sharing agreements related to the assets that were divested. These indemnifications and cost sharing agreements have included provisions related to the condition of the property, the approved use, certain representations and warranties, matters of title, and

environmental matters. While most of these provisions have not specifically dealt with environmental issues, there have been transactions in which U. S. Steel indemnified the buyer for clean-up or remediation costs relating to the business sold or its then existing conditions or past practices related to non-compliance with environmental laws. Most of the recent indemnification and cost sharing agreements are of a limited nature, only applying to non-compliance with past and/or current laws. Some indemnifications and cost sharing agreements only run for a specified period of time after the transactions close and others run indefinitely. In addition, current owners or operators of property formerly owned or operated by U. S. Steel may have common law claims and cost recovery and contribution rights against U. S. Steel related to environmental matters. The amount of potential ~~claims~~environmental liability associated with these transactions and properties is not estimable due to the nature and extent of the unknown conditions related to the properties divested and deconsolidated. Aside from the ~~Slovak Government for repayment~~environmental liabilities already recorded as a result of ~~a portion of the grant funds received.~~

~~Due~~these transactions due to ~~other EU legislation, BAT for Large Combustion Plants (LCP), we are required to make changes to the boilers at our steam~~specific environmental remediation activities and ~~power generation plant in order to comply with stricter air emission limits for large combustion plants. The requirements for LCP resulted~~cases (included in the ~~construction~~$176 million of ~~a new boiler~~accrued liabilities for remediation discussed above), there are no other known probable and ~~certain upgrades~~estimable environmental liabilities related to our existing boilers. In January 2014, the operation of USSK's boilers was approved by the European Commission (EC) as part of Slovakia's Transitional National Plan (TNP) for bringing all boilers in Slovakia into compliance by no later than 2020. The TNP establishes emissions ceilings for each category of emissions (total suspended particulate, sulfur dioxide (SO₂~~), and nitrogen oxide (NO~~_x)). The allowable amount of discharged emissions from existing boilers will decrease each year until mid-2020. These projects will result in a reduction in electricity, emissions, and operating, maintenance and waste disposal costs. The construction of both boilers is complete with a total final installed cost of €128 million (approximately $150 million). Broad legislative changes were enacted by the Slovak Republic to extend the scope of support for renewable sources of energy, that are intended to allow USSK to participate in Slovakia's renewable energy incentive program once the boiler projects are completed.these transactions.

Guarantees – The maximum guarantees of the indebtedness of unconsolidated entities of U. S. Steel totaled $4$4 million at September 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

Other contingencies– Under certain operating lease agreements covering various equipment, U. S. Steel has the option to renew the lease or to purchase the equipment at the end of the lease term. If U. S. Steel does not exercise the purchase option by the end of the lease term, U. S. Steel guarantees a residual value of the equipment as determined at the lease inception date (totaling approximately $1621 million at September 30, ~~2018~~2019). NoNaN liability has been recorded for these guarantees as the potential loss is not probable.

Insurance– U. S. Steel maintains insurance for certain property damage, equipment, business interruption and general liability exposures; however, insurance is applicable only after certain deductibles and retainages. U. S. Steel is self-insured for certain other exposures including workers’ compensation (where permitted by law) and auto liability. Liabilities are recorded for workers’ compensation and personal injury obligations. Other

costs resulting from losses under deductible or retainage amounts or not otherwise covered by insurance are charged against income upon occurrence.

U. S. Steel uses surety bonds, trusts and letters of credit to provide whole or partial financial assurance for certain obligations such as workers’ compensation. The total amount of active surety bonds, trusts and letters of credit being used for financial assurance purposes was approximately $~~197~~161 million as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019, which reflects U. S. Steel’s maximum exposure under these financial guarantees, but not its total exposure for the underlying obligations. A significant portion of our trust arrangements and letters of credit are collateralized by ~~the~~our Credit Facility Agreement. The remaining trust arrangements and letters of credit are collateralized by restricted cash. Restricted cash, which is recorded in other current and noncurrent assets, totaled $4120 million and $4440 million at September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018, respectively.

Capital Commitments– At September 30, ~~2018~~2019, U. S. Steel’s contractual commitments to acquire property, plant and equipment totaled $~~649~~977 million.

Contractual Purchase Commitments – U. S. Steel is obligated to make payments under contractual purchase commitments, including unconditional purchase obligations. Payments for contracts with remaining terms in excess of one year are summarized below (in millions):



Remainder of 2019	2020	2021	2022	2023	Later Years	Total
$219	$599	$397	$330	$322	$723	$2,590

Remainder of 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Later
Years Total
$195 $581 $482 $309 $304 $1,147 $3,018

The majority of U. S. Steel’s unconditional purchase obligations ~~relates~~relate to the supply of industrial gases, and certain energy and utility services with terms ranging from two to 1516 years. Unconditional purchase obligations also include coke and steam purchase commitments related to a coke supply agreement with Gateway Energy &

Coke Company LLC (Gateway) under which Gateway is obligated to supply a minimum volume of the expected targeted annual production of the heat recovery coke plant, and U. S. Steel is obligated to purchase the coke from Gateway at the contract price. As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019, if U. S. Steel were to terminate the agreement, it may be obligated to pay in excess of $~~168~~117 million.

Total payments relating to unconditional purchase obligations were $167 million and $147 million ~~and~~ ~~$132 million~~ for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018, respectively, and ~~$454~~$493 million and ~~$425~~$454 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively.

~~23.~~ 24. Significant Equity Investments

Summarized unaudited income statement information for our significant equity investments for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 is reported below (amounts represent 100% of investee financial information):



(In millions)	2019		2018
Net sales	$	1,857	$	1,662
Cost of sales	1,624		1,510
Operating income	190		114
Net earnings	172		101
Net earnings attributable to significant equity investments	172		101

U. S. Steel's portion of the equity in net earnings of the significant equity investments above was $66 million and $37 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, which is included in the earnings from investees line on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

25. Common Stock Repurchase Program

In November 2018, U. S. Steel ~~Canada Inc. Retained Interest~~

~~On June~~announced a two year common stock repurchase program that allows for the repurchase of up to $300 million of its outstanding common stock from time to time in the open market or privately negotiated transactions at the discretion of management. During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2019, U. S. Steel ~~completed~~repurchased 5,289,475 shares of common stock for approximately $88 million. As of September 30, 2019, there is approximately $137 million remaining under the restructuring and disposition of USSC through a sale and transfer of all of the issued and outstanding shares in USSC to an affiliate of Bedrock. In accordance with the Second Amended and Restated Plan of Compromise, Arrangement and Reorganization, approved by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on June 9, 2017, U. S. Steel received approximately $127 million in satisfaction of its secured claims, including interest, which resulted in a gain of $72 million on the Company's retained interest in USSC. U. S. Steel also agreed to the discharge and cancellation of its unsecured claims for nominal consideration. The terms of the settlement also included mutual releases among key stakeholders, including a release of all claims against the Company regarding environmental, pension and other liabilities.share repurchase authorization.

~~24.~~ 26. Equity Investee Transactions

On September 29, 2017, a subsidiary of U. S. Steel completed the sale of its 15% ownership interest in Tilden Mining Company L.C. for $105 million. As a result of the transaction, U. S. Steel recognized a gain of approximately $26 million.

On May 31, 2018, U. S. Steel assigned its equity ownership interest in Leeds Retail Center, LLC and recognized a pre-tax gain of approximately $18 million.

~~25.~~ 27. Subsequent Events

Big River Steel Acquisition

On ~~October 15, 2018, U. S. Steel and the United Steelworkers (USW) reached~~September 30, 2019, a tentative agreement on successor four-year Collective Bargaining Agreements covering approximately 14,000 USW-represented employees at all of the company’s domestic flat-rolled and iron ore mining facilities as well as tubular operations in Fairfield, Alabama, Lorain, Ohio, and Lone Star, Texas. The tentative agreements remain subject to ratification, which is anticipated to be completed by the end of November of 2018.

On October 15, 2018, USSK drew down €200 million (approximately $232 million) from its USSK Credit Agreement and subsequently repatriated most of the funds to its parent, U. S. Steel. U. S. Steel intends to use the funds, together with cash on hand, for the redemption of its 7.375% Senior Notes due in 2020 (2020 Senior Notes) as discussed below.

~~On October 23, 2018, a~~wholly owned subsidiary of U. S. Steel ~~completed the sale of its 40%~~entered into 2 separate equity interest purchase agreements, pursuant to which, among other things, U. S. Steel agreed to acquire a 49.9% ownership interest in ~~Acero Prime, S. R. L. de CV. As~~Big River Steel at a ~~result~~purchase price of approximately $700 million in cash, with a call option to acquire the ~~transaction,~~ remaining 50.1% within the next four years at an agreed-upon price formula based on Big River Steel’s achievement of certain metrics that include: free cash flow, product development, safety and the completion of a proposed expansion of Big River Steel's existing manufacturing line. Big River Steel currently operates a technologically advanced mini mill with approximately 1.7 million tons of steel making capacity. The acquisition closed on October 31, 2019.

U. S. Steel ~~recognized~~will account for its investment in Big River Steel under the equity method as control and risk of loss are shared among the partnership members. Under the equity method of accounting, U. S. Steel will recognize its share of Big River Steel's after tax net income or loss as well as the amortization of any basis differences due to the step-up to fair value of certain assets and liabilities attributable to Big River Steel.

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement

On October 25, 2019, we entered into a ~~pretax gain~~new five-year senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount up to $2.0 billion (Fifth Credit Facility Agreement) to replace the existing Credit Facility Agreement. The Fifth Credit Facility Agreement has substantially the same terms as the existing Credit Facility Agreement, except the Fifth Credit Facility Agreement will mature five years from the date of effectiveness, includes a “first-in, last-out” tranche in an amount up to $150 million and includes certain other changes, including changes to the fixed charge coverage ratio allowing us to exclude (i) certain capital expenditures from the calculation of the ratio and (ii) any restricted payments made pursuant to any share repurchase program from the calculation of "consolidated fixed charges." On October 30, 2019, we drew $700 million on the Fifth Credit Facility Agreement to fund the closing of our acquisition of a 49.9% interest in Big River Steel.

Environmental Revenue Bonds

On October 10, 2019, we launched offerings of 2 series of environmental revenue bonds in aggregate principal amount of approximately ~~$20~~$368 million, that will mature between 2024 and 2049 (collectively, the “2019 Environmental Revenue Bonds”). Proceeds of the 2019 Environmental Revenue Bonds in the ~~fourth quarter~~amount of ~~2018.~~approximately $93 million will be used to redeem a portion of our existing outstanding environmental revenue bonds for which we issued a conditional redemption notice. Proceeds of the 2019 Environmental Revenue Bonds in the amount of $275 million will be used to finance or refinance the acquisition, construction, equipping and installation of certain solid waste disposal facilities, including an electric arc furnace and other equipment and facilities at the Company’s Fairfield Works. The 2019 Environmental Revenue Bonds closed on October 25, 2019.

2026 Senior Convertible Notes

On ~~November 1, 2018,~~October 21, 2019, U. S. Steel issued an aggregate principal amount of $300 million of 5.00% Senior Convertible Notes due November 1, 2026 (2026 Senior Convertible Notes), with a ~~notice~~30-day option to ~~redeem its 2020~~purchase up to an additional $50 million in aggregate principal amount of 2026 Senior ~~Notes.~~Convertible Notes, on the same terms and conditions. On ~~December 3, 2018, the next business day~~October 25, 2019, U. S. Steel issued an additional $50 million of 2026 Senior Convertible Notes after the ~~redemption date,~~full option was exercised. U. S. Steel received net proceeds of approximately $340 million from the sale of the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes after deducting underwriting fees and estimated

offering expenses. The Company intends to use the net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including, without limitation, for previously announced strategic investments and capital expenditures. Interest on the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing on May 1, 2020. See Note 16 for further details.

Prior to August 1, 2026, holders of notes may convert all or a portion of their notes at their option only upon the satisfaction of specified conditions and during certain periods. On or after August 1, 2026, holders may convert all or a portion of their notes at any time prior to the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date. Upon conversion, we will satisfy the obligation with cash, common stock, or a combination thereof, at our election. U. S. Steel may not redeem the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes prior to November 5, 2023. On or after November 5, 2023 and prior to August 1, 2026, if the price per share of U. S. Steel's common stock has been at least 130% of the conversion price for ~~cash~~specified periods, U. S. Steel may redeem all or a portion of ~~its outstanding 2020~~the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes ~~(approximately $356 million aggregate principal amount),~~ at ~~the~~a cash redemption price of 100% of the principal amount, ~~thereof,~~ plus accrued and unpaid interest.

If U. S. Steel undergoes a ~~make-whole premium and~~fundamental change, as defined in the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes, holders may require us to repurchase the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes in whole or in part for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes to be purchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest (including additional interest, if ~~any,~~any) up to, but ~~not including,~~excluding the ~~redemption~~repurchase date. ~~The redemption~~

For accounting purposes, the proceeds received from the issuance of the notes will be ~~funded by~~allocated between debt and equity to reflect the fair value of the conversion option embedded in the notes and the fair value of similar debt without the conversion option. As a ~~combination~~result, based on the aggregate principal amount of ~~cash on hand and borrowings under~~$350 million, we estimate that we will record approximately $106 million of the ~~USSK Credit Agreement. U. S. Steel~~gross proceeds of the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes as an increase in additional paid-in capital with the offsetting amount recorded as a debt discount. The debt discount will ~~incur a loss on early extinguishment~~be amortized over the term of the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes using an estimated interest rate of 10.5% (the estimated effective borrowing rate for nonconvertible debt at the time of ~~approximately $20 million associated with this redemption.~~issuance) which will accrete the carrying value of the notes to the principal amount at maturity.



Item 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

U. S. Steel's results in the third quarter of 2019 were significantly impacted by market challenges in each of the Company's three reportable segments: North American Flat-Rolled (Flat-Rolled), U. S. Steel Europe (USSE) and Tubular Products (Tubular). In Flat-Rolled, our contract and spot orders were impacted by the continued decline in weekly index prices. USSE continues to experience margin compression due to continued high levels of imports and significantly weaker economic conditions, primarily in the manufacturing sector. In Tubular, continued high levels of imports are negatively impacting the market.

Net sales by segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 are set forth in the following table:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in millions, excluding intersegment sales)	2018		2017		% Change		2018		2017		% Change		2019		2018		% Change		2019		2018		% Change
Flat-Rolled Products (Flat-Rolled)	$	2,632	$	2,249	17	%	$	7,114	$	6,265	14	%
U. S. Steel Europe (USSE)	767		710		8	%	2,438		2,123		15	%
Tubular Products (Tubular)	313		276		13	%	888		682		30	%
Flat-Rolled													$	2,277	$	2,632	(13	)%	$	7,221	$	7,114	2	%
USSE													518		767		(32	)%	1,933		2,438		(21	)%
Tubular													262		313		(16	)%	921		888		4	%
Total sales from reportable segments	3,712		3,235		15	%	10,440		9,070		15	%	3,057		3,712		(18	)%	10,075		10,440		(3	)%
Other Businesses	17		13		31	%	47		47		—	%	12		17		(29	)%	38		47		(19	)%
Net sales	$	3,729	$	3,248	15	%	$	10,487	$	9,117	15	%	$	3,069	$	3,729	(18	)%	$	10,113	$	10,487	(4	)%

Management’s analysis of the percentage change in net sales for U. S. Steel’s reportable business segments for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 versus the three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 is set forth in the following table:

Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 versus Three Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018


	Steel Products ^(a)												Steel Products^(a)
	Volume		Price		Mix		FX ^(b)		Coke & Other ^(c)		Net Change		Volume	Price	Mix	FX^(b)	Coke & Other^(c)	Net Change
Flat-Rolled	4	%	16	%	(1	)%	—	%	(2	)%	17	%	—%	(12)%	(1)%	—%	—%	(13)%
USSE	3	%	7	%	(1	)%	(1	)%	—	%	8	%	(30)%	(3)%	5%	(3)%	(1)%	(32)%
Tubular	(2	)%	13	%	1	%	—	%	1	%	13	%	(4)%	(8)%	(2)%	—%	(2)%	(16)%

^(a) Excludes intersegment sales

^(b) Foreign currency translation effects

^(c) Includes sales of coke and scrap inventory

Net sales were ~~$3,729~~$3,069 million in the three months ended September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, compared with ~~$3,248~~$3,729 million in the same period last year. The decrease in sales for the Flat-Rolled segment resulted from lower realized prices (decrease of $127 per net ton), notably for hot-rolled products. The USSE segment continues to experience significant market challenges, which resulted in decreased sales versus the same period last year. The change in sales for the USSE segment was primarily due to decreased shipments (decrease of 336 thousand net tons) in most product categories from continued high levels of imports and significantly weaker economic conditions, primarily in the manufacturing sector. The weakening of the euro versus the U.S. dollar was also an adverse impact in the third quarter of 2019. The decrease in sales for the Tubular segment resulted from lower average realized prices (decrease of $185 per net ton) and decreased shipments (decrease of 10 thousand net tons) from lower demand in seamless products.

Management’s analysis of the percentage change in net sales for U. S. Steel’s reportable business segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 versus the nine months ended September 30, 2018 is set forth in the following table:

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 versus Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018



	Steel Products^(a)
	Volume	Price	Mix	FX^(b)	Coke & Other^(c)	Net Change
Flat-Rolled	5%	(3)%	(1)%	—%	1%	2%
USSE	(16)%	(2)%	3%	(6)%	—%	(21)%
Tubular	3%	2%	—%	—%	(1)%	4%

^(a) Excludes intersegment sales

^(b) Foreign currency translation effects

^(c) Includes sales of coke and scrap inventory

Net sales were $10,113 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared with $10,487 million in the same period in the prior year. The increase in sales for the Flat-Rolled segment primarily reflects ~~higher realized prices (increase of $131 per net ton) across all product types and~~ increased shipments (increase of ~~115~~406 thousand net tons) ~~due to accelerated demand for steel products in line with the recent economic growth.~~of semi-finished and hot rolled products. The ~~increase~~decrease in sales for the USSE segment was primarily due to ~~higher average realized euro-based prices (increase~~decreased shipments (decrease of ~~€31 per net ton) and increased shipments (increase of 34~~551 thousand net tons) in most product categories due to ~~improved market conditions.~~increased import competition, flat to declining demand and the weakening of the euro versus the U.S. dollar. The increase in sales for the Tubular segment resulted from higher realized prices (increase of ~~$169 per net ton) due to improved market conditions.~~

~~Management’s analysis of the~~ ~~percentage change in net sales~~ ~~for U. S. Steel’s reportable business segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 versus the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is set forth in the following table:~~

~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 versus Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017~~

Steel Products ^(a)

Volume Price Mix
FX ^(b)

Coke &
Other ^(c)
Net
Change
Flat-Rolled 4 % 10 % (1 )% — % 1 % 14 %
USSE 1 % 5 % 1 % 8 % — % 15 %
Tubular 11 % 18 % 1 % — % — % 30 %

^(a) ~~Excludes intersegment sales~~

^(b) ~~Foreign currency translation effects~~

^(c) ~~Includes sales of coke and scrap inventory~~

Net sales were $10,487 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared with $9,117 million in the same period last year. The increase in sales for the Flat-Rolled segment primarily reflects higher realized prices (increase of $77 per net ton) across all product types and increased shipments (increase of 332 thousand net tons) due to accelerated demand for steel products in line with the recent economic growth. The increase in sales for the USSE segment was primarily due to strengthening of the euro versus the U.S. dollar and higher average realized euro-based prices (increase of €28 per net ton). The increase in sales for the Tubular segment resulted from higher realized prices (increase of $209$24 per net ton) and increased shipments (increase of 5512 thousand net tons) ~~due to improved market conditions.~~.

Pension and other benefits costs

Pension and other benefit costs (other than service cost) are reflected within net interest and other financial costs and the service cost component is reflected within cost of sales in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Defined benefit and multiemployer pension plan costs included in cost of goods sold totaled ~~$28~~$31 million and ~~$82~~$90 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019, respectively, compared to $28 million and ~~$81~~$82 million in the comparable periods in ~~2017.~~

2018.

Costs related to defined contribution plans totaled ~~$11~~$12 million and ~~$32~~$35 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively, compared to $11 million and $32 million in the comparable periods in ~~2017.~~2018.

Other benefit expense included in cost of sales totaled $4 million and ~~$12~~$10 million in the three ~~months~~ and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019, respectively, and $4 million and ~~$13~~$12 million in the comparable periods in ~~2017.~~2018.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $63 million and $223 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively, compared to $81 million and $251 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, ~~respectively, compared to $75 million and $223 million in~~respectively. For both the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, respectively. For both~~2019 the decrease is primarily due to a decrease in variable compensation.

Restructuring charges

During the three months and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019, the ~~increase~~Company recorded restructuring charges of $25 million related to its labor productivity strategy within its USSE segment and $29 million for the intended indefinite idling of its East Chicago Tin operations and its finishing facility in Dearborn, Michigan within its Flat-Rolled segment, see further details below.

Charges for restructuring initiatives are recorded in the period the Company commits to a restructuring plan, or executes specific actions contemplated by the plan and all criteria for liability recognition have been met. Charges related to restructuring are reported in restructuring charges in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Business Strategy

U. S. Steel is ~~primarily due~~executing a transformational strategy to develop the “best of both” integrated and mini mill capabilities to improve competitiveness and drive through-cycle cash flow. Through a series of operational improvements, strategic investments and portfolio moves, to be completed over the next several years, U. S. Steel plans to execute a strategy focused on acquiring technology and capabilities to improve competitiveness and drive through-cycle cash flow generation. Execution of U. S. Steel’s strategy will position the Company with a suite of world-class assets with distinct advantages to serve current and future customers with high-tech, sustainable steel solutions. The strategy is focused on commercial differentiation, which the Company currently believes can be achieved by investing in three core market-leading, differentiated and technologically advanced assets at Mon Valley Works (located near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania), Gary Works (located in Gary, Indiana) and Big River Steel (located in Osceola, Arkansas). The Company will be able to compete effectively in strategic end markets based on cost and/or capabilities to offer customers differentiated products to deliver highly competitive long-term cash flow generation through higher earnings and lower sustaining capital expenditures.

Strategic projects and technology investments

On October 31, 2019, the Company completed the first step in acquiring Big River Steel in Osceola, Arkansas through the purchase of a 49.9% ownership interest at a purchase price of approximately $700 million in cash, with a call option to acquire the remaining 50.1% within the next four years at an ~~increase in variable compensation.~~

~~Operating configuration update~~ agreed-upon price formula based on Big River Steel’s achievement of certain metrics that include: free cash flow, product development, safety and the completion of a proposed expansion of Big River Steel's existing manufacturing line. Big River Steel currently operates a technologically advanced mini mill with approximately 1.7 million tons of steel making capacity.

In ~~March 2018,~~May 2019, U. S. Steel announced that it will construct a new endless casting and rolling facility at its Edgar Thomson Plant in Braddock, Pennsylvania, and a cogeneration facility at its Clairton Plant in Clairton, Pennsylvania, both part of the Company's Mon Valley Works. This investment in state-of-the-art sustainable steel technology is expected to significantly upgrade the production capability of our lowest liquid steel cost mill in the U.S., while further reducing conversion costs through improved process efficiencies, yield and energy consumption. The investment is currently expected to be at least $1.2 billion through 2022 and is expected to generate run-rate earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) of approximately $275 million beginning in 2023. The Company continues to evaluate design and engineering for the project.

The installation of endless casting and rolling technology will allow differentiated product capabilities to serve strategic markets. The Mon Valley Works will also become the principal source of substrate for the production of the Company's industry-leading XG3^TM Advanced High Strength Steel (AHSS), a market leading solution for our customers to improve fuel efficiency. The cogeneration facility, equipped with state-of-the-art emissions control systems at the Company's Clairton Plant, will convert a portion of the coke oven gas generated at its Clairton Plant into electricity to power the steelmaking and finishing facilities throughout U. S. Steel's Mon Valley operations. This project, in addition to producing

sustainable AHSS, is expected to improve environmental performance, energy conservation and reduce our carbon footprint associated with Mon Valley Works. First steel production is expected in 2022, contingent upon permitting and construction.

In February 2019, U. S. Steel restarted construction of the EAF steelmaking facility at its Tubular Operations in Fairfield, Alabama. The EAF is expected to strengthen our competitive position and reduce cost by $90 per ton as the Company becomes self-sufficient in its rounds supply, which is expected to generate approximately $80 million of annual EBITDA contribution beginning in 2021. The EAF is expected to begin producing steel in the second half of 2020.

In January 2019, U. S. Steel announced the construction of a new Dynamo line at USSE. The new line, a $130 million investment, has an annual capacity of approximately 100,000 metric tons. Construction on the Dynamo line began in mid-2019 and under the original business plan was targeted to be operational in the fourth quarter of 2020. Upon its completion, the new line will enable production of sophisticated silicon grades of non-grain oriented (NGO) electrical steels to support increased demand in vehicles and generators. The project is expected to contribute $35 million of run-rate EBITDA. Due to significant market challenges in Europe, the Company will evaluate the pace of this investment.

As part of its asset revitalization program (described below), the Company expects to invest approximately $500 million, of which approximately 30 percent has already been spent, to upgrade the Gary Works hot strip mill through a series of projects focused on expanding the line's competitive advantages. The Gary Works hot strip mill will further differentiate itself as a leader in heavy gauge products in strategic markets. Asset revitalization investments are also being made at other critical Flat-Rolled steel making assets, including the Mon Valley Works steel shop, which will provide high quality, low cost liquid steel for our future endless casting and rolling line.

Operating configuration

As the Company invests in differentiated technology and re-centers around its core assets, it will also adjust its operating configuration to best facilitate execution of its strategy and respond to market conditions and customer demand.

On October 8, 2019, the Company announced that it is implementing an enhanced operating model and organizational structure to accelerate the Company’s strategic transformation and better serve its customers. The new operating model will be effective January 1, 2020 and will be centered around manufacturing, commercial, and technological excellence. Our former “commercial entity” structure was put into place to deepen understanding of business ownership and our relationships with customers and allowed the Company to identify the technology that would ~~restart~~differentiate our products and processes on the basis of cost and/or capabilities. The new enhanced operating model is a logical next step in the execution of the Company’s strategy and will make us a more nimble company positioned to deliver the benefits of our strategy through the cycle.

In August 2019, the Company began the process of indefinitely idling its East Chicago Tin operations within its Flat-Rolled segment due primarily to increased tin import levels in the U.S. We anticipate completion of this process, which will include headcount reductions of approximately 150, sometime during the fourth quarter of 2019. Additionally, U. S. Steel intends to indefinitely idle its finishing facility in Dearborn, Michigan (which operates an electrolytic galvanizing line) during the fourth quarter of 2019.

In July 2019, U. S. Steel began implementing a labor productivity strategy at USSK so that it could better compete in the European steel market, which has experienced softening demand as well as a significant increase in imports. It is anticipated that the labor productivity strategy will result in total headcount reductions, including contractors, of approximately 2,500 by the end of 2021. As of September 30, 2019, approximately 1,800 positions, including approximately 400 contractors, were eliminated.

In June 2019, U. S. Steel idled two blast furnaces in the U.S. and one blast furnace in Europe to better align global production with its order book. As a result, monthly blast furnace production capacity was reduced by approximately 200,000 - 225,000 tons in the U.S. and 125,000 tons in Europe. Blast furnace production at one or more of the idled furnaces may resume when market conditions improve.

In June 2019, U. S. Steel restarted the No. 1 Electric-Weld Pipe Mill (No. 1 Pipe Mill) at its Lone Star Tubular Operations to enable the Company to support increased demand for high-quality electric-welded pipe produced in the United States. The No. 1 Pipe Mill produces 7-16 inch welded pipe and is complementing our current Tubular product offerings. It had been idled since 2016.

In June and October 2018, U. S. Steel restarted the "B" blast furnace and steelmaking facilities and the "A" blast furnace, respectively, at its Granite City Works facility ~~which would enable the Company~~in response to ~~support anticipated~~ increased demand ~~for steel produced in~~at the ~~United States as a result of the Section 232 investigation into steel imports. The restart occurred in the second quarter of 2018.~~time.

Additionally, in June 2018, U. S. Steel announced that it would restart the "A" blast furnace at its Granite City Works facility, which will support increased demand for steel manufactured in the United States, while allowing the Company to continue to support customers during planned asset revitalization efforts. The restart was completed in October 2018.

~~In March 2017, U. S. Steel made the strategic decision to permanently shut down and relocate the Lorain #6 Quench & Temper Mill as a result of the challenging market conditions for tubular products.~~

U. S. Steel will continue to evaluate potential strategic and organizational opportunities, which may include the acquisition, divestiture or consolidation of assets. ~~We continue to focus~~Given the cyclicality of our industry, we are focused on strategically ~~deploying~~maintaining and spending cash (including strategic capital ~~investments under our asset revitalization program)~~expenditures in technology investments), in order to invest in areas consistent with our long-term strategy, such as sustainable steel technologies, and are considering various possibilities, including exiting lines of business and the sale of certain assets, that we believe would ~~further that goal and~~ ultimately result in greater stockholder value. The Company will pursue opportunities based on its long-term strategy, and what the Board of Directors determines to be in the best interests of the Company's stockholders at the time.

Asset Revitalization

~~Better operating performance~~In 2017, we launched our asset revitalization program, a multi-year, comprehensive $2 billion investment (which included $1.5 billion in capital spending) in our most critical assets within our Flat-Rolled ~~segment, coupled~~segment. The program is composed of many projects designed to continuously improve safety, quality, delivery and cost performance. As we revitalize our assets, we are increasing profitability, productivity and operational stability, and reducing volatility. This program is designed to prioritize investment in the areas with ~~relatively stable market conditions during 2017~~the highest returns, like the Gary Works hot strip mill investments described above. As the Company refocuses its strategy on technology investments, it will rescope the asset revitalization program, and ~~2018, have resulted in improved segment results in recent quarters.~~currently plans to reduce the program by approximately $200-250 million. We currently expect capital spending for the entire program to be approximately $1.3 billion, $800 million of which has already been spent. As we continue with the implementation of our asset revitalization program ~~described below, and increase investment in our facilities,~~on selective assets, we expect ~~to realize~~ the sustainable improvements in safety, quality, delivery and ~~cost that~~costs we are targeting to position us to succeed over the long term and to support future growth initiatives. In view of our having substantially implemented the program, and because the program has been reprioritized in order to invest in other opportunities, the Company no longer intends to provide annual scorecards against the original target metrics.

~~Asset Revitalization~~

As part of our long-term strategy, the Board of Directors approved a $2 billion multi-year asset revitalization program focused on our Flat-Rolled segment. Management evaluated performance in the key industries we serve, and developed projects across multiple Flat-Rolled segment assets with a focus on continuous improvement in safety, quality, delivery and cost. The Company views this program as essential to improving reliability and our ability to compete effectively in the industry. As we revitalize our assets, we expect to increase profitability, productivity and operational stability and reduce volatility.

The asset revitalization program includes projects to address short-term operational and maintenance enhancements as well as larger initiatives. The projects vary in scope and cost. The investments specifically address issues that are critical to delivering quality products to our customers in a timely manner.

The identified projects and schedule may change to address our customers’ needs, current and future economic operating conditions, and risks identified in the production cycle. Through the multi-year asset revitalization program, we expect to make total capital investments of $1.5 billion, which consist of capital investments in our iron making facilities, steel making facilities, hot rolling facilities, and finishing facilities. The Company plans to fund the program through cash generated from operations and cash on hand.

The benefits of the asset revitalization program are already evident, as we have achieved performance improvements from assets in which we have invested. We continue to experience operational challenges on assets we have not yet fully addressed. We expect further improvements in performance as we execute the remainder of our structured asset revitalization program.

~~Restructuring and Other Charges~~

~~Restructuring charges recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2018 were immaterial. Cash payments were made related to severance and exit costs of $18 million.~~

Charges for restructuring and ongoing cost reduction initiatives are recorded in the period U. S. Steel commits to a restructuring or cost reduction plan, or executes specific actions contemplated by the plan and all criteria for liability recognition have been met. Charges related to the restructuring and cost reductions are reported in the restructuring and other charges in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes by segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 is set forth in the following table:

Three Months Ended
September 30, %
Change Nine Months Ended
September 30, %
Change
(Dollars in millions) 2018 2017 2018 2017
Flat-Rolled $ 305
$ 161
89 % $ 562
$ 293
92 %
USSE 72
73
(1 )% 297
215
38 %
Tubular 7
(7 ) 200 % (55 ) (93 ) 41 %
Total earnings from reportable segments 384
227
69 % 804
415
94 %
Other Businesses 16
12
33 % 44
34
29 %
Segment earnings before interest and income taxes 400
239
67 % 848
449
89 %
Items not allocated to segments:

Gain on equity investee transactions —
21

18
21

Granite City Works restart costs (27 ) —

(63 ) —

Granite City Works adjustment to temporary idling charges —
—

8
—

Gain associated with retained interest in U. S. Steel Canada Inc. —
—

—
72

Loss on shutdown of certain tubular assets —
—

—
(35 )
Total earnings before interest and income taxes $ 373
$ 260
43 % $ 811
$ 507
60 %



		Three Months Ended September 30,						% Change		Nine Months Ended September 30,						% Change
	(Dollars in millions)	2019			2018			% Change		2019			2018			% Change
Flat-Rolled		$	46		$	305		(85	)%	$	275		$	562		(51	)%
USSE		(46		)	72			(164	)%	(27		)	297			(109	)%
Tubular		(25		)	7			(457	)%	(21		)	(55		)	62	%
	Total earnings from reportable segments	(25		)	384			(107	)%	227			804			(72	)%
Other Businesses		8			16			(50	)%	26			44			(41	)%
	Segment (loss) earnings before interest and income taxes	(17		)	400			(104	)%	253			848			(70	)%
Items not allocated to segments:
	December 24, 2018 Clairton coke making facility fire	(9		)	—					(53		)	—
	Restructuring charges	(54		)	—					(54		)	—
	Gain on equity investee transactions	—			—					—			18
	Granite City Works restart costs	—			(27		)			—			(63		)
	Granite City Works adjustment to temporary idling charges	—			—					—			8
Total (loss) earnings before interest and income taxes		$	(80	)	$	373		(121	)%	$	146		$	811		(82	)%

Segment results for Flat-Rolled


	Three Months Ended September 30,						% Change			Nine Months Ended September 30,								% Change		Three Months Ended September 30,						% Change			Nine Months Ended September 30,						% Change
	2018			2017					2018				2017				2019			2018				2019				2018							% Change
Earnings before interest and taxes ($ millions)	$	305		$	161		% Change	89	%		$	562			$	293		% Change			92	%	$	46		% Change	$	305		(85	)%		$	275		$	562	(51	)%
Gross margin	16		%	13		%	3	%		14		%		11		%		3	%	8		%	16		%	(8	)%		10		%	14		%	(4	)%
Raw steel production (mnt)	2,933			2,821			4	%		8,558				8,247				4	%	2,783			2,933			(5	)%		8,842			8,558			3	%
Capability utilization	68		%	66		%	2	%		67		%		65		%		2	%	65		%	68		%	(3	)%		70		%	67		%	3	%
Steel shipments (mnt)	2,659			2,544			5	%		7,777				7,445				4	%	2,654			2,659			—	%		8,183			7,777			5	%
Average realized steel price per ton	$	859		$	728		18	%		$	807			$	730			11	%	$	732		$	859		(15	)%		$	771		$	807		(4	)%

The ~~increase~~decrease in Flat-Rolled results for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017~~2018 was primarily due to ~~higher~~lower average realized prices (approximately ~~$325~~$335 million) ~~as a result~~and continued high levels of ~~improved market conditions, and increased shipments, including substrate to our Tubular segment (approximately $30 million).~~imports. This change was partially offset by ~~increased spending for maintenance and outage costs (approximately $90 million), higher~~lower raw material costs (approximately ~~$75~~$15 million), decreased energy costs (approximately $10 million), a contingency gain from recovered claims arising out of the bankruptcy of a supplier (approximately $10 million) and ~~an increase in~~decreased other ~~operating~~ costs, ~~primarily due to increased~~including variable compensation (approximately ~~$45~~$40 million).

The ~~increase~~decrease in Flat-Rolled results for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017~~2018 was primarily due to ~~higher~~lower average realized prices (approximately ~~$610~~$230 million) ~~as a result of improved market conditions,~~, higher raw material costs (approximately $75 million) and increased spending for operating costs (approximately $85 million). These changes were partially offset by increased shipments, including substrate to our Tubular segment (approximately ~~$75~~$65 million) and ~~lower energy~~decreased other costs, (approximately $20 million). This change was partially offset by higher raw material costs (approximately $245 million), increased spending for maintenance and outage costs (approximately $125 million) and an increase in other operating costs primarily due to increasedincluding variable compensation (approximately ~~$65~~$40 million).

Gross margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2017 increased~~2018 decreased primarily as a result of ~~higher~~lower average realized prices.

Segment results for USSE


	Three Months Ended September 30,						% Change			Nine Months Ended September 30,								% Change		Three Months Ended September 30,						% Change			Nine Months Ended September 30,						% Change
	2018			2017					2018				2017				2019			2018				2019				2018							% Change
Earnings before interest and taxes ($ millions)	$	72		$	73		% Change	(1	)%		$	297			$	215		% Change			38	%
(Loss) earnings before interest and taxes ($ millions)																				$	(46	)	$	72		% Change	(164	)%		$	(27	)	$	297		(109	)%
Gross margin	13		%	15		%	(2	)%		16		%		14		%		2	%	(2		)%	13		%	(15	)%		4		%	16		%	(12	)%
Raw steel production (mnt)	1,210			1,235			(2	)%		3,810				3,778				1	%	823			1,210			(32	)%		3,130			3,810			(18	)%
Capability utilization	96		%	98		%	(2	)%		102		%		101		%		1	%	65		%	96		%	(31	)%		84		%	102		%	(18	)%
Steel shipments (mnt)	1,101			1,067			3	%		3,384				3,333				2	%	765			1,101			(31	)%		2,833			3,384			(16	)%
Average realized steel price per ton	$	669		$	639		5	%		$	695			$	617			13	%
Average realized steel price per ($/ton)																				$	656		$	669		(2	)%		$	660		$	695		(5	)%
Average realized steel price per (€/ton)																				€	590		€	575		3	%		€	587		€	582		1	%

The decrease in USSE results for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018 remained consistent~~2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017. The results included an increase~~2018 was primarily due to ~~higher~~the continued market challenges and continued high levels of imports in Europe and the significant compression in margins from lower average realized ~~euro-based~~ prices (approximately ~~$45~~$15 million)~~. This increase was offset by~~, decreased shipments (approximately $50 million), the weakening of the euro versus the U.S. dollar (approximately $10 million), higher raw material costs (approximately ~~$30~~$35 million) which includes an unfavorable first-in-first-out (FIFO) inventory impact, and ~~increased other~~higher energy costs (approximately ~~$15~~$10 million).

The ~~increase~~decrease in USSE results for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017~~2018 were significantly impacted by continued market challenges in Europe and was primarily due to ~~higher~~lower average realized ~~euro-based~~ prices (approximately ~~$115~~$45 million) ~~and~~, decreased shipments (approximately $60 million), the ~~strengthening~~weakening of the euro versus the U.S. dollar (approximately $65 million)~~. These increases were partially offset by~~, higher raw material costs (approximately ~~$50~~$90 million), which includes ~~a favorable first-in-first-out (FIFO)~~an unfavorable FIFO inventory impact, ~~and~~ increased spending on operating costs (approximately ~~$50~~$25 million), higher energy costs (approximately $25 million) and increased other costs, including carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions allowance (approximately $15 million).

Gross margin for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017~~2018 decreased primarily as a result of ~~reduced capacity utilization. Gross margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 increased primarily as a result of~~lower average realized prices and higher ~~realized prices.~~raw material and energy costs.

Segment results for Tubular


	Three Months Ended September 30,						% Change			Nine Months Ended September 30,								% Change		Three Months Ended September 30,						% Change			Nine Months Ended September 30,						% Change
	2018			2017					2018				2017				2019			2018				2019				2018							% Change
Earnings (loss) before interest and taxes ($ millions)	$	7		$	(7	)	% Change	200	%		$	(55	)		$	(93	)	% Change			41	%
(Loss) earnings before interest and taxes ($ millions)																				$	(25	)	$	7		% Change	(457	)%		$	(21	)	$	(55	)	62	%
Gross margin	7		%	4		%	3	%		—		%		(5		)%		5	%	(4		)%	7		%	(11	)%		2		%	—		%	2	%
Steel shipments (mnt)	184			185			(1	)%		564				509				11	%	174			184			(5	)%		576			564			2	%
Average realized steel price per ton	$	1,602		$	1,433		12	%		$	1,477			$	1,268			16	%	$	1,417		$	1,602		(12	)%		$	1,501		$	1,477		2	%

The ~~increase~~decrease in Tubular results for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 as compared to the same period in ~~2017~~2018 was primarily due to ~~higher~~lower average realized prices (approximately ~~$20~~$30 million) and decreased ~~other~~shipments (approximately $5 million) due to the continued high levels of imports, increased spending on operating costs (approximately $10 million) and increased costs associated with the continued execution of the commercial and technology strategy (approximately $15 million). These ~~increases~~changes were partially offset by ~~higher~~lower substrate and rounds costs (approximately ~~$20~~$30 million).

The increase in Tubular results for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same period in ~~2017~~2018 was primarily due to higher average realized prices (approximately ~~$90~~$15 million) and ~~improved shipment volumes~~lower substrate and rounds costs (approximately $50 million). These changes were partially offset by increased spending on operating costs (approximately $20 million) and increased costs associated with the continued execution of the commercial and technology strategy (approximately $10 million). ~~This increase was partially offset by higher substrate costs (approximately $60 million).~~

Gross margin for the three ~~and~~months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018 decreased primarily as a result of lower average realized prices. Gross margin for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2017~~2018 increased primarily as a result of higher average realized ~~prices.~~prices and lower substrate and rounds costs.

Results for Other Businesses

Other Businesses had ~~income~~earnings of $8 million and $26 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to earnings of $16 million and $44 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 ~~compared~~.

Items not allocated to ~~income~~segments

We recorded $54 million of ~~$12 million and $34 million~~restructuring charges in the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~.2019 for our labor productivity strategy at USSK and the intended indefinite idling of East Chicago Tin and our finishing facility in Dearborn, Michigan within the Flat-Rolled segment.

We incurred $9 million and $53 million of costs associated with the December 24, 2018 Clairton coke making facility fire in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively (see Environmental Matters, Litigation and Contingencies in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section for more details).

~~Items not allocated to segments~~

We recognized a gain on equity investee transactions of $18 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 as a result of the assignment of our entire equity ownership interest in ~~Leeds~~Leed's Retail Center, LLC in May 2018. ~~We recognized a $21 million~~ ~~gain on equity investee transactions~~ ~~in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 due to the sale of our 15% ownership interest in Tilden Mining Company, L.C.~~

We recognized $27 million and $63 million in Granite City Works restart costs in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 ~~respectively,~~ as a result of costs associated with the restart of the ~~"A" and~~ "B" blast ~~furnaces~~furnace at Granite City Works.

We recorded an $8 million favorable adjustment in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 related to Granite City Works temporary idling charges as a result of the decision to restart the "B" blast furnace and steelmaking facilities at this facility in 2018.

~~We recognized a $72 million~~ ~~gain associated with our retained interest in U. S. Steel Canada Inc.~~ ~~(USSC) in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as a result of the restructuring and disposition of USSC on June 30, 2017.~~

~~We recorded a $35 million~~ ~~loss on the shut down of certain tubular assets~~ ~~in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as a result of the permanent shut down and relocation of the No. 6 Quench & Temper Mill at Lorain Tubular Operations.~~

Net interest and other financial costs


	Three Months Ended September 30,						% Change			Nine Months Ended September 30,							% Change			Three Months Ended September 30,							% Change			Nine Months Ended September 30,							% Change
(Dollars in millions)	2018			2017					2018				2017				% Change		2019				2018				% Change		2019				2018				% Change
Interest expense	$	41		$	60		% Change	(32	)%		$	134			$	173		(23	)%		$	32			$	41		(22	)%		$	97			$	134		(28	)%
Interest income	(6		)	(5		)	20	%		(16		)		(13		)	23	%		(3		)		(6		)	(50	)%		(13		)		(16		)	(19	)%
Loss on debt extinguishment	3			31			(90	)%		77				32			141	%		—				3			(100	)%		—				77			(100	)%
Other financial costs	2			12			(83	)%		4				37			(89	)%		(4		)		2			(300	)%		(2		)		4			(150	)%
Net periodic benefit cost (other than service cost)	19			15			27	%		53				47			13	%		23				19			21	%		69				53			30	%
Total net interest and other financial costs	$	59		$	113		(48	)%		$	252			$	276		(9	)%		$	48			$	59		(19	)%		$	151			$	252		(40	)%

The decrease in net interest and other financial costs in the three months ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the same period last year is primarily due to reduced interest expense due to our lower average cost of debt.

The decrease in net interest and other financial costs in the nine months ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the same period last year is primarily due to the loss on debt extinguishment in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 as described below and reduced interest expense due to our improved debt profile, partially offset by higher net periodic benefit cost as discussed below.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, U. S. Steel issued $650 million aggregate principal amount of 2026 Senior Notes and repurchased through a tender offer and redemption $780 million of its 2021 Senior Secured Notes for an aggregate cash outflow of approximately $840 million, which included $60 million in premiums. Additionally, U. S. Steel repurchased approximately $75 million of its 2020 Senior Notes during the first nine months of 2018. The loss on debt extinguishment line in the table above includes $66 million in premiums and $11 million in unamortized debt issuance costs which were written off in connection with the extinguishment of debt. For further information, see Note 1516 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

The decrease in net interest and other financial costs in the three months ended September 30, 2018 as compared to the same period last year is primarily due to a loss on debt extinguishment in the three months ended September 30, 2017, reduced interest expense due to our improved debt profile and net foreign currency gains on our euro-U.S. dollar derivatives.

The decrease in net interest and other financial costs in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 as compared to the same period last year is primarily due to reduced interest expense as a result of our improved debt profile and net foreign currency gains on our euro-U.S. dollar derivatives partially offset by a higher loss on debt extinguishment in 2018.

The net periodic benefit cost (other than service cost) components of pension and other benefit costs are reflected in the table above, and increased in the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 as compared to the same

periods last year ~~mainly~~primarily due to ~~higher settlement charges~~a lower expected return on asset assumption for pension assets, a lower asset return than expected in 2018 ~~resulting from lump sum payments for certain individuals.~~partially offset by the natural maturation of the plan and increased discount rates.

Total net periodic pension cost, including service cost and multiemployer plans, is expected to total approximately ~~$143~~$170 million in ~~2018.~~2019. Total other benefits costs, including service cost, in ~~2018~~2019 are expected to total approximately ~~$60~~$57 million. The pension cost projection includes approximately ~~$60~~$77 million of contributions to the Steelworkers Pension Trust.

Income taxes

The income tax (benefit) provision was $(44) million and $(43) million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $23 million and $36 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 ~~compared to less than $1 million~~. The tax provision in both periods reflects a benefit for percentage depletion in excess of cost depletion from iron ore that we produce and ~~$3 million in the three and nine months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2017~~.consume or sell. In 2018, the tax provision also reflects a tax benefit for the release of a portion of the ~~domestic~~ valuation allowance due to pretax income. ~~Included in the~~

The tax provision infor the first nine months of 2017 is a benefit of $13 million related to the carryback of certain losses to prior years, as well as a benefit of $25 million related to the Company's intent to claim a refund of Alternative Minimum Tax credits pursuant to a provision in the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act. As a result, the provision recorded in the third quarter of ~~2017~~2019 was ~~immaterial.~~

~~On December 22, 2017,~~based on an estimated annual effective rate, which requires management to make its best estimate of annual pretax income or loss. For the ~~Tax Cuts~~quarters ended June 30, 2019 and ~~Jobs Act (the 2017 Act) was signed into law. The 2017 Act includes changes to U.S. federal~~September 30, 2019, the Company computed its tax ~~rates, imposes significant additional limitations on~~benefit using the deductibility of interest, allows for the immediate expensing of capital expenditures, and puts into effect the migration from a worldwide system of taxation to a territorial system, among other things. After review, we have determined that the 2017 Act will have a minimal impact on the 2018discrete period effective tax rate, ~~due~~which reflects the actual taxes attributable to ~~the Company's current corporate tax structure~~year-to-date earnings and ~~net operating losses. However,~~losses, because we ~~had~~determined that a ~~reduction in cash taxes paid in 2018 due to the elimination~~reliable estimate of the ~~Alternative Minimum Tax and expect that benefit to continue~~expected annual effective tax rate could not be made. A small change in ~~future years.~~

~~Each quarter U. S. Steel analyzes~~our estimated marginal pretax results for the ~~likelihood that our deferred~~year ended December 31, 2019 could create a large change in the expected annual effective tax ~~assets will be realized. A valuation allowance is recorded if, based on the weight of all available positive and negative evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all,~~rate. The sensitivity of the ~~deferred~~effective tax ~~asset may not be realized.~~

~~Despite six consecutive quarters~~rate was increased by the benefit for percentage depletion in excess of pretax domestic income, at September 30, 2018, U. S. Steel determined that the negative evidence, including the uncertainty regarding the Company's continued ability to generate domestic income in the near term, still outweighs the positive evidence and concluded that is more likely than not that all of its net domestic tax asset may not be realized.

~~As our projections~~cost depletion for 2019 are refined in the fourth quarter of this year, and with consideration of the profitability of our domestic operations in 2017 and year to date in 2018, it is reasonably possible that we may conclude that realization is more likely than not for some or all of the deferred tax asset with a valuation allowance, and we will reduce the related valuation allowance and record a non-cash benefit.iron ore.

For further information on income taxes see Note 1113 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net earnings attributable to United States Steel Corporation were $(84) million and $38 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, compared to net earnings of $291 million and $523 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018~~, compared to net earnings of $147 million and $228 million in the three and nine months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2017~~. The changes primarily reflect the factors discussed above.

BALANCE SHEET

Accounts ~~receivable~~ ~~increased~~Receivable decreased by ~~$294~~$259 million from year-end ~~2017 primarily due to higher average realized prices as well as increased shipment volumes across all of our segments.~~

~~Inventories~~ ~~increased by $212 million from year-end 2017~~2018 primarily as a result of ~~increased operating levels and higher raw material prices.~~lower sales.

~~Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities~~Operating lease assets increased by ~~$355~~$239 million from year-end ~~2017 primarily~~2018 as a result of ~~increased operating levels and higher raw material prices across all~~the adoption of ~~our segments.~~the new accounting standard for leases (see Note 8 for further details).

Property, plant and equipment, net increased by ~~$363~~$445 million from year-end 2018 primarily due to the level of capital expenditures exceeding depreciation expense.

Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities decreased by $286 million from year-end 2018 primarily as a result of lower production levels for our Flat-Rolled and USSE segments.

Payroll and benefits payable ~~increased~~ decreased by ~~$78~~$95 million from year-end ~~2017~~2018 primarily due to profit-based incentive payments related to 2018 financial performance that were paid in the first quarter of 2019.

Current operating lease liabilitiesincreased ~~accruals for variable compensation.~~

~~Long-term debt~~ ~~decreased~~ by ~~$202~~$56 million from year-end ~~2017~~2018 as a result of the adoption of the new accounting standard for leases (see Note 8 for further details).

Noncurrent operating lease liabilities increased by $189 million from year-end 2018 as a result of the adoption of the new accounting standard for leases (see Note 8 for further details).

Long-term debt, less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs increased by $184 million from year-end 2018 primarily due to borrowings on the tender of approximately $499 million of our 2021 Senior Secured Notes in March 2018 and the redemption of the remaining $281 million in April 2018 and the repurchase of $75 million of our 2020 Senior Notes throughout 2018, partially offset by the issuance of $650 million aggregate principal amount of our 2026 Senior Notes in March 2018 . For additional information, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.USSK Credit Agreement.

Employee benefits decreased by ~~$93~~$75 million from year-end ~~2017~~2018 primarily as a result of impacts from the natural maturation of our pension plans.

CASH FLOW

Net cash provided by operating activities was ~~$722~~$396 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of ~~$546~~$722 million in the same period last year. The ~~increase~~decrease in cash from operations is primarily due to ~~stronger~~lower financial results, partially offset by changes in working capital period over ~~period~~.period.

Changes in working capital can vary significantly depending on factors such as the timing of inventory production and purchases, which is affected by the length of our business cycles as well as our captive raw materials position, customer payments of accounts receivable and payments to vendors in the regular course of business.

Our key working capital components include accounts receivable and inventory. The accounts receivable and inventory turnover ratios for the three months and twelve months ended September 30,~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 are as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,		Twelve Months Ended September 30,		Three Months Ended September 30,		Twelve Months Ended September 30,
	2018	2017	2018	2017	2019	2018	2019	2018
Accounts Receivable Turnover	2.3	2.2	8.5	8.6	2.0	2.3	9.0	8.5
Inventory Turnover	1.7	1.6	6.4	6.1	1.4	1.7	6.2	6.4

The ~~increase~~decrease in the ~~inventory~~accounts receivable turnover approximates ~~one day~~5 days for the three months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 as compared to the same period ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and is primarily due to ~~an increase~~decreased sales as a result of lower average realized prices in ~~cost of goods sold mainly attributed to higher raw material costs.~~our Flat-Rolled segment. The increase in the ~~inventory~~accounts receivable turnover approximates ~~three~~2 days for the twelve months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 as compared to the same period ended September 30, ~~2017~~2018 and is primarily due to ~~an increase~~increased shipments in ~~cost of goods sold mainly attributed to higher raw material costs.~~our Flat-Rolled and Tubular segments.

The ~~accounts receivable~~decrease in the inventory turnover ~~remained consistent~~approximates 12 days and 2 days for the three ~~months~~ and twelve months ended September 30, ~~2018~~2019 as compared to the three months and twelve months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2018, respectively, and is primarily due to decreased shipments in our USSE segment.

The last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventory method is the predominant method of inventory costing in the United States. ~~At September 30, 2018 and September 30, 2017, the~~The LIFO method accounted for 71 percent ~~and 74 percent~~ of total inventory values ~~respectively.~~at both September 30, 2019 and September 30, 2018. In the U.S., management monitors inventory realizability by comparing the LIFO cost of inventory with the replacement cost of inventory. To the extent the replacement cost (i.e., market value) of inventory is lower than the LIFO cost of

inventory, management will write the inventory down. As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 the replacement cost of the inventory was higher by approximately ~~$1,024~~$999 million and ~~$802~~$1,038 million, respectively. Additionally, based on the Company’s latest internal forecasts and its inventory requirements, management does not believe there will be significant permanent LIFO liquidations that would impact earnings for the remainder of ~~2018.~~2019.

Our cash conversion cycle for the third quarter of ~~2018 decreased~~2019 increased by ~~four~~nine days as compared to the fourth quarter of ~~2017~~2018 as shown below:


Cash Conversion Cycle	2018			2017			2019		2018
	$ millions		Days	$ millions		Days	$ millions	Days	$ millions	Days
Accounts receivable, net ^(a)	$	1,673	41	$	1,379	43	$1,400	45	$1,659	42

+ Inventories ^(b)	$	1,950	55	$	1,738	58	$2,071	67	$2,092	58

- Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities^(c)	$	2,523	70	$	2,163	71	$2,182	75	$2,477	72


= Cash Conversion Cycle ^(d)			26			30		37		28

^(a)Calculated as Average Accounts Receivable, net divided by total Net Sales multiplied by the number of days in the period.

^(b)Calculated as Average Inventory divided by total Cost of Sales multiplied by the number of days in the period.

^(c)Calculated as Average Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities less bank checks outstanding and other current liabilities divided by total Cost of Sales multiplied by the number of days in the period.

^(d)Calculated as Accounts Receivable Days plus Inventory Days less Accounts Payable Days.

The cash conversion cycle is a non-generally accepted accounting principles (non-GAAP) financial measure. We believe the cash conversion cycle is a useful measure in providing investors with information regarding our cash management performance and is a widely accepted measure of working capital management efficiency. The cash conversion cycle should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to other GAAP metrics as an indicator of performance.

Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, were ~~$646~~$978 million, compared with ~~$291~~$646 million in the same period in ~~2017~~2018. ~~Flat-rolled~~Flat-Rolled capital expenditures were ~~$531~~$764 million and included spending for the ~~Great Lakes~~Mon Valley No. 3 Blast Furnace ~~D4 Major Repairs,~~outage, Mon Valley ~~sulfur dioxide (SO~~₂~~) Boiler Stack project, Great Lakes Blast Furnace D4 No. 1 Stove Rebuild, Clairton C-Battery, Minntac Open Pit Equipment,~~Endless Casting and Rolling, Gary Hot Strip Mill ~~Motors and Table Covers, Granite City A Restart~~upgrades, Great Lakes B2 Blast Furnace, Midwest Tin Cold Mill upgrades, and various other infrastructure, environmental and strategic projects. Tubular capital expenditures ~~of $33~~were $97 million ~~primarily related to~~and included spending for the Fairfield Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) project, Offshore Operations ~~Threading Line No. 5~~threading line and ~~Swage~~swage extension ~~Lorain No. 3 Rotary Mill Reliability, as well as~~and various other strategic capital projects. USSE capital expenditures of ~~$63~~$111 million consisted of spending for ~~No. 3 coke battery Thru-Wall Replacement, Blast Furnace 1 No. 13 Stove Rebuild, Continuous Pickle Line 1 upgrade~~improved Sinter Strand emission control, improved Ore Bridges Emission control, the new Dynamo line and various other infrastructure and environmental projects.

U. S. Steel’s contractual commitments to acquire property, plant and equipment at September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, totaled ~~$649~~$977 million.

Capital expenditures for ~~2018~~2019 are expected to total approximately $1$1.24 billion, not including the acquisition of a 49.9% ownership interest in Big River Steel, and remain focused largely on ~~strategic,~~projects that further our strategy, infrastructure and environmental ~~projects, as well as asset revitalization of~~projects.

Revolving and other credit facilities - borrowings, net totaled $165 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 due to our ~~equipment~~borrowing on the USSK Credit Agreement.

Common stock repurchased under our common stock repurchase program approved in 2018 totaled 5,289,475 shares and approximately $88 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2019. See Note 25 to ~~improve our operating reliability and efficiency, and product quality and cost by focusing on investments in our North American Flat-Rolled segment.~~the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.

Issuance of long-term debt, net of financing costs, totaled $640 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018, U. S. Steel issued $650 million aggregate principal amount of 2026 Senior Notes. U. S. Steel received net proceeds from the offering of approximately $640 million after fees of approximately $10 million related to underwriting and ~~third-party~~third party expenses. ~~For further information, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

Repayment of long-term debt totaled $922 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2018. ~~Pursuant to a cash tender offer,~~ U. S. Steel repurchased ~~$499~~through a tender offer and subsequent redemption approximately $780 million of ~~our~~its outstanding 2021 Senior Secured Notes ~~in March 2018~~ and ~~redeemed the remaining $281 million in April 2018. Approximately~~paid premiums of $60 million ~~in premiums were paid~~ for the ~~2021 Senior Secured Notes transactions.~~tender. Additionally, U. S. Steel repurchased approximately $75 million of its 2020 Senior Notes through a series of open market purchases ~~at a weighted average price of 107.119 percent of par during the nine months ended September 30, 2018~~ and paid premiums of approximately $5 million.

~~For further information, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The following table summarizes U. S. Steel’s liquidity as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019:

(Dollars in millions)

Cash and cash equivalents $ 1,344
Amount available under $1.5 Billion Credit Facility Agreement 1,500

Amount available under USSK credit facilities 566

Total estimated liquidity $ 3,410



(Dollars in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	476
Amount available under $1.5 Billion Credit Facility Agreement	1,350
Amount available under USSK credit facilities	152
Total estimated liquidity	$	1,978

As of September 30, ~~2018~~2019, ~~$197~~$79 million of the total cash and cash equivalents was held by our foreign subsidiaries. Substantially all of the liquidity attributable to our foreign subsidiaries can be accessed without the imposition of income taxes as a result of the election effective December 31, 2013 to liquidate for U.S. income tax purposes a foreign subsidiary that holds most of our international operations.

On February 26, 2018, U. S. Steel entered into the Credit Facility Agreement, replacing its Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Credit Facility Agreement maintains the facility size of $1.5 billion and extends the maturity date to 2023.

As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, there were no amounts drawn under the $1.5 billion Credit Facility Agreement. U. S. Steel must maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.00 to 1.00 for the most recent four consecutive quarters when availability under the Credit Facility Agreement is less than the greater of 10 percent of the total aggregate commitments and $150 million. Based on the four quarters as of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, we would not have met this covenant. IfSo long as we ~~are unable~~continue to not meet this covenant, ~~in future periods,~~ the amount available to the Company ~~under this facility would be~~is effectively reduced by $150 million. As a result, availability under this facility was $1,350 million as of September 30, 2019.

On ~~September 26, 2018, USSK, and one of its wholly owned subsidiaries, as guarantor,~~October 25, 2019, we entered into a €~~460~~new five-year senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility in an aggregate amount up to $2.0 billion (Fifth Credit Facility Agreement) to replace the existing Credit Facility Agreement. The Fifth Credit Facility Agreement has substantially the same terms as the existing Credit Facility Agreement, except the Fifth Credit Facility Agreement will mature five years from the date of effectiveness, includes a “first-in, last-out” tranche in an amount up to $150 million and includes certain other changes, including changes to the fixed charge coverage ratio allowing us to exclude (i) certain capital expenditures from the calculation of the ratio and (ii) any restricted payments made pursuant to any share repurchase program from the calculation of "consolidated fixed charges." On October 30, 2019, we drew $700 million on the Fifth Credit Facility Agreement to fund the closing of our acquisition of a 49.9% interest in Big River Steel.

On October 10, 2019, we launched offerings of two series of environmental revenue bonds in aggregate principal amount of approximately $368 million, that will mature between 2024 and 2049 (collectively, the “2019 Environmental Revenue Bonds”). Proceeds of the 2019 Environmental Revenue Bonds in the amount of approximately $93 million will be used to redeem a portion of our existing outstanding environmental revenue bonds for which we issued a conditional redemption notice. Proceeds of the 2019 Environmental Revenue Bonds in the amount of $275 million will be used to finance or refinance the acquisition, construction, equipping and installation of certain solid waste disposal facilities, including an electric arc furnace and other equipment and facilities at the Company’s Fairfield Works. The 2019 Environmental Revenue Bonds closed on October 25, 2019.

At September 30, 2019, USSK had borrowings of €350 million (approximately $381 million) under its €460 million (approximately $501 million) unsecured revolving credit ~~facility (USSK Credit Agreement), replacing USSK's~~ €200 million revolving credit facility (Prior Facility). The USSK Credit Agreement has a maturity date of September 26, 2023 and contains terms and conditions similar to the Prior Facility. Concurrent with the execution of the USSK Credit Agreement, USSK reduced the size of a separate €40 million unsecured credit facility to €20 million.

~~At September 30, 2018, USSK had no borrowings under its~~ €~~460 million (approximately $533 million) USSK Credit Agreement.~~facility. The USSK Credit Agreement contains certain USSK financial covenants, including a maximum net debt to EBITDA ratio and a minimum stockholders' equity to assets ratio. The covenants are measured semi-annually for the period covering the last twelve calendar months and calculated as set forth in the USSK Credit Agreement. If USSK does not comply with the USSK Credit Agreement financial covenants, it may not draw on the facility until the next measurement date, outstanding borrowings may be accelerated, or the margin on outstanding borrowings may be increased. At September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, USSK had ~~full~~ availability of €110 million (approximately $120 million) under the USSK Credit Agreement. ~~On October 15, 2018, USSK drew down €200 million (approximately $232 million) from its~~The USSK Credit Agreement ~~and subsequently repatriated most of the funds to its parent, U. S. Steel. U. S. Steel intends to use the funds, together with cash on hand, for the redemption of its 7.375% Senior Notes due~~expires in ~~2020 (2020 Senior Notes) as discussed below.~~ September 2023.

At September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, USSK had no borrowings under its €20 million and €10 million unsecured credit facilities (collectively, approximately ~~$35~~$33 million) and the ~~aggregate~~ availability was approximately ~~$33~~$32 million due to approximately $2$1 million of customs and other guarantees outstanding. The €20 million credit facility expires in December 2018. Currently, the €10 million credit facility also expires in December 2018, but can be extended one additional year to the final maturity date at the mutual consent of USSK and its lender.

Through a series of open market purchases, U. S. Steel repurchased approximately $75 million of its 2020 Senior Notes at a weighted average price of 107.119 percent of par during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

On November 1, 2018, U. S. Steel issued a notice to redeem its 2020 Senior Notes. On December 3, 2018, the next business day after the redemption date, the Company will redeem for cash all of its outstanding 2020 Senior Notes (approximately $356 million aggregate principal amount), at the redemption price of 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus a make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the redemption date. The redemption will be funded by a combination of cash on hand and borrowings under the USSK Credit

~~Agreement. U. S. Steel will incur a loss on early extinguishment of debt of approximately $20 million associated with this redemption.~~

In March 2018, U. S. Steel issued $650 million aggregate principal amount of 2026 Senior Notes. U. S. Steel received net proceeds from the offering of approximately $640 million after fees of approximately $10 million related to the underwriting and third-party expenses. The net proceeds from the issuance of the 2026 Senior Notes, together with cash on hand, were used to repurchase all of our outstanding 2021 Senior Secured Notes (see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Debt" for further details). U. S. Steel will pay interest on the notes semi-annually in arrears on March 15th and September 15th of each year, commencing on September 15, 2018.

We may from time to time seek to retire or repurchase our outstanding long-term debt through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, exchange transactions, redemptions or otherwise. Such purchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, and other factors and may be commenced or suspended at any time. The amounts involved may be material.

We use surety bonds, trusts and letters of credit to provide financial assurance for certain transactions and business activities. The use of some forms of financial assurance and cash collateral have a negative impact on liquidity. U. S. Steel has committed ~~$197~~$161 million of liquidity sources for financial assurance purposes as of September 30, ~~2018~~.2019. Increases in certain of these commitments which use collateral are reflected within cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

At September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, in the event of a change in control of U. S. Steel, the following may occur: (a) debt obligations totaling ~~$2,106~~$2,131 million as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 may be declared due and payable; (b) the Credit Facility Agreement and the USSK credit facilities may be terminated and any amounts outstanding declared due and payable; and (c) U. S. Steel may be required to either repurchase the leased Fairfield slab caster for ~~$24~~$21 million or provide a cash collateralized letter of credit to secure the remaining obligation.

The maximum guarantees of the indebtedness of unconsolidated entities of U. S. Steel totaled $4 million at September 30, ~~2018~~.2019. If any default related to the guaranteed indebtedness occurs, U. S. Steel has access to its interest in the assets of the investees to reduce its potential losses under the guarantees.

Our major cash requirements in ~~2018~~2019 are expected to be for capital expenditures, ~~including asset revitalization,~~the acquisition of Big River Steel (which closed on October 31, 2019), employee benefits and operating costs, which includes purchases of raw materials. We finished the third quarter of ~~2018~~2019 with ~~$1,344~~$476 million of cash and cash equivalents and ~~$3.4~~$2.0 billion of total liquidity. Available cash is left on deposit with financial institutions or invested in highly liquid securities with parties we believe to be creditworthy.

The ~~Board of Directors has authorized a stock repurchase program under~~Company currently expects approximately $950 million in capital expenditures for 2020, which up to $300 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock may be acquired over the next two years at the discretion of management. The shares will be purchased from time to time at prevailing market prices, through open market or privately negotiated transactions, depending upon market conditions. Under the program, the purchases will be funded from cash on hand, and the repurchased shares will be held as treasury shares. As of September 30, 2018, there were no repurchases under this program.includes spending for strategic projects described earlier.

U. S. Steel management believes that U. S. Steel's liquidity will be adequate to satisfy our obligations for the foreseeable future, including obligations to complete currently authorized capital spending programs. Future requirements for U. S. Steel’s business needs, including the funding of acquisitions and capital expenditures, scheduled debt maturities, repurchase of debt, share ~~buybacks,~~buyback, contributions to employee benefit plans, and any amounts that may ultimately be paid in connection with contingencies, are expected to be financed by a combination of internally generated funds (including asset sales), proceeds from the sale of stock, borrowings, refinancings and other external financing sources.

Environmental Matters, Litigation and Contingencies

Some of U. S. Steel’s facilities were in operation before 1900. Although management believes that U. S. Steel’s environmental practices have either led the industry or at least been consistent with prevailing industry practices, hazardous materials may have been released at current or former operating sites or delivered to sites operated by third parties.

Our U.S. facilities are subject to environmental laws applicable in the U.S., including the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), as well as state and local laws and regulations.

U. S. Steel has incurred and will continue to incur substantial capital, operating, and maintenance and remediation expenditures as a result of environmental laws and regulations, related to release of hazardous materials, which in recent years have been mainly for process changes to meet CAA obligations and similar obligations in Europe.

Midwest Plant Incident

On April 11, 2017, there was a process waste water release at our Midwest Plant (Midwest) in Portage, Indiana that impacted a water outfall that discharges to Burns Waterway near Lake Michigan. U. S. Steel identified the source of the release and made the necessary repairs. We determined that all repairs were safely working as intended and, on April 14, 2017, resumed operations in a controlled, phased and highly monitored approach with extensive input from participating government agencies. The Company has since implemented substantial operational, process and notification improvements at Midwest. The Company has been presented with cost reimbursements, loss of use and penalty requests from the involved governmental agencies. In January of 2018, The Surfrider Foundation and the City of Chicago initiated suits in the Northern District of Indiana alleging CWA and Permit violations at Midwest. On April 2, 2018, the ~~United States~~U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) and the State of Indiana initiated a separate action against the Company and lodged a Consent Decree negotiated between U. S. Steel and the relevant governmental agencies consisting of all material terms to resolve the CWA and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) violations at the Midwest Plant. A public comment period for the Consent Decree ensued. ~~U. S. Steel, U.S. EPA~~The suits that the Surfrider Foundation and the ~~State~~City of ~~Indiana continue to review those comments.~~Chicago filed are currently stayed. The Surfrider Foundation and the City of Chicago ~~initially agreed to stay their actions pending finalization of the Consent Decree, but~~also filed ~~a motion to lift that stay in July 2018. On September 13, 2018, both The Surfrider Foundation and the City of Chicago filed~~ motions, which were granted, to intervene in the Consent Decree ~~case which remain pending.~~case. U. S. Steel continues to work with United States Department of Justice, U.S. EPA, and Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) towards a finalized Consent Decree.

EU Environmental Requirements and Slovak Operations

Under the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS), USSK's final allocation of allowances for the Phase III period, which covers the years 2013 through 2020 is 48 million allowances. Based on projected future production levels, we started to purchase allowances in the third quarter of 2017 to meet the annual compliance submission in the future. As of September 30, 2019, we have purchased approximately 12 million European Union Allowances totaling €132 million (approximately $144 million). We estimate that the total shortfall will be approximately 12 million allowances for the Phase III period. Although the full cost of complying with the ETS regulations depends on future production levels and future emissions intensity levels, at this time we do not believe that the cost for the Phase III period will be significantly different from the costs we have already incurred.

The EU’s ~~Industry Emission~~Industrial Emissions Directive requires implementation of EU determined best available techniques (BAT) for iron and steel production, to reduce environmental impacts as well as compliance with BAT associated emission levels. This directive includes operational requirements for air emissions, wastewater discharges, solid waste disposal and energy conservation, dictates certain operating practices and imposes stricter emissions limits. Producers were required to be in compliance with the iron and steel BAT by March 8, 2016, unless specific exceptions or extensions were granted by the Slovak environmental authority. USSK updated existing operating permits for different facilities involved in producing iron and steel in the plant in accordance with the new BAT requirements. Through this process for some facilities, USSK has obtained extensions from the 2016 compliance deadline in order to meet or exceed the BAT requirements. Compliance with stricter emissions limits going beyond BAT requirements makes us eligible for EU funding support and prepares us for any further tightening of environmental protection standards. Our most recent broad estimate of ~~likely total~~future capital expenditures for projects ~~to comply with or~~that go beyond ~~the~~ BAT requirements ~~for~~is up to €138 million (approximately $150 million) over the 2017 to 2020 program ~~period is €138 million (approximately $161 million). Through September 30, 2018,~~period. These costs may be mitigated if USSK ~~spent €9 million (approximately $11 million) toward the total estimated capital expenditures for the 2017 to 2020 program period.~~

The EU has various programs under which funds are allocated to member states to implement broad public policies which are then awarded by the member states to public and private entities on a competitive basis. The funding intensity under these programs currently ranges from 55 percent of defined eligible costs on a project under the standard state scheme to 90 percent under an approved ad hoc scheme to improve the air quality in the Košice region of Slovakia. Based on our list of projects that comprise the approximate €138 million (approximately $161 million) of spending noted, we currently believe we will be eligible to receive up to €78 million (approximately $91 million) of incentive grants. This could potentially reduce our net cash expenditures to approximately €60 million (approximately $70 million). The actual amount of capital spending will be dependent upon, among other things, the actual amount of incentive grants received. In order to receive full grant amounts, USSK is required to complycomplies with certain financial covenants, which are assessed annually. USSK complied with these covenants as of September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. If we are unable to meet these covenants in the future, USSK might be required to provide additional collateral (e.g. bank guarantee) to secure ~~potential claims from~~ the ~~Slovak Government for repayment~~full value of ~~a portion of the grant funds received.~~

~~We also believe there will~~estimated expenditures. There could be increased operating costs associated with these projects, such as increased energy and maintenance costs. We are currently unable to reliably estimate what the increase in operating costs will be as many projects are still in the development stage.

On March 28, 2017, the Regional Court in Košice issued an ex parte judicial lien on USSK's real property to plaintiffs in an ongoing legal case. Following a decision of the Slovakian Supreme Court, which reversed and remanded the

lien petition to the Regional Court, the lien has been removed. The Regional Court, which had originally issued the ex parte judicial lien, has decided that the imposition of a lien is not warranted and has not re-imposed the lien. The underlying case is still ongoing.

For further discussion of laws applicable in Slovakia and the EU and their impact on USSK, see Note 2223 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Contingencies and Commitments - Environmental Matters, EU Environmental Requirements.”

New and Emerging Environmental Regulations

United States and European Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulations

Future compliance with CO₂emission requirements may include substantial costs for emission allowances, restriction of production and higher prices for coking coal, natural gas and electricity generated by carbon based systems. Because we cannot predict what requirements ultimately will be imposed in the U.S. and Europe, it is difficult to estimate the likely impact on U. S. Steel, but it could be substantial. On March 28, 2017, President Trump signed Executive Order 13783 instructing the ~~United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA)~~U.S. EPA to review the Clean Power Plan. On October 16, 2017, the U.S. EPA proposed to repeal the Clean Power Plan after reviewing the plan pursuant to President Trump’s executive order. Any repeal and/or replacement of the Clean Power Plan is likely to be challenged by various proponents of the plan, such as environmental groups and certain states. Any impacts to our operations as a result of any future greenhouse gas regulations are not estimable at this time since the matter is unsettled. In any case, to the extent expenditures associated with any greenhouse gas regulation, as with all costs, are not ultimately reflected in the prices of U. S. Steel's products and services, operating results will be reduced. In addition, on April 2, 2018, the U.S. EPA Administrator signed a notice in which the U.S. EPA withdrew from its prior January 12, 2017 Final Determination regarding greenhouse gas emission standards for model year (MY) 2022-2025 light duty vehicles. In the April 2, 2018 notice, the U.S. EPA provided its new determination that the greenhouse gas emission standards for MY 2022-2025 light duty vehicles are not appropriate in light of the record before the U.S. EPA and, therefore, the standards should be revised. The U.S. EPA, in partnership with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, will initiate a notice and comment rulemaking in a forthcoming Federal Register notice to further consider appropriate standards for MY 2022-2025 light-duty vehicles. California and other states have threatened to sue the U.S. EPA over the Agency’s withdrawal of the prior determination.

There have been no material changes in U. S. Steel’s exposure to European Greenhouse Gas Emissions regulations since December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

United States - Air

The CAA imposes stringent limits on air emissions with a federally mandated operating permit program and civil and criminal enforcement sanctions. The CAA requires, among other things, the regulation of hazardous air pollutants through the development and promulgation of National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Standards. The U.S. EPA has developed various industry-specific MACT standards pursuant to this requirement. The CAA requires the U.S. EPA to promulgate regulations establishing emission standards for each category of Hazardous Air Pollutants. The U.S. EPA also must conduct risk assessments on each source category that is already subject to MACT standards and determine if additional standards are needed to reduce residual risks.

While our operations are subject to several different categories of NESHAP and MACT standards, the principal impact of these standards on U. S. Steel operations includes those that are specific to coke making, iron making, steel making and iron ore processing.

The U.S. EPA is currently in the process of completing a Residual Risk and Technology Review of the Integrated Iron and Steel MACT regulations, Coke MACT regulations, and Taconite Iron Ore Processing MACT regulations as required by the CAA. The U.S. EPA is under a court order to complete the Residual Risk and Technology Review of the Integrated Iron and Steel regulations no later than March 13, 2020; and to complete the Residual Risk and Technology Review of the Taconite Iron Ore Processing Regulations by June 30, 2020.

On August 16, 2019, U.S. EPA published a proposed Residual Risk and Technology Review (RTR) rule for the Integrated Iron and Steel MACT category in the Federal Register. Based on the results of U.S. EPA’s risk review, the Agency proposed that risks due to emissions of air toxics from the Integrated Iron and Steel category are acceptable and that the current regulations provided an ample margin of safety to protect public health. Under the technology review, U.S. EPA proposed that there are no developments in practices, processes or control technologies that necessitate revision of the standards. However, the Agency is taking comment on the consideration of work practices for the control of certain unmeasurable fugitive and intermittent particulate sources. U.S. EPA is accepting comment on the proposed rule until November 7, 2019. Based upon our analysis of the integrated iron and steel proposed rule, the Company does not expect any material impact if the rule is finalized as proposed. For the Taconite Iron Ore Processing category, based on the results of the Agency’s risk review, U.S. EPA is proposing that risks from emissions of air toxics from this source category are acceptable and that the existing standards provide an ample margin of safety. Furthermore, under the technology review, the Agency identified no cost-effective developments in controls, practices, or processes to achieve further emissions reductions. Therefore, U.S. EPA is proposing no revisions to the existing standards based on the RTRs. U.S. EPA is accepting comments on the taconite proposed rule until October 25, 2019. Based upon our analysis of the proposed taconite rule, the Company does not expect any material impact if the rule is finalized as proposed. Because the U.S. EPA has not completed its review of the Coke MACT regulations, any impacts related to the U.S. EPA’s review of ~~these~~the coke standards cannot be estimated at this time.

On March 12, 2018, the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) submitted a CAA Section ~~126~~126(b) petition to the U.S. EPA. In the petition, the DEC asserts that stationary sources from the following nine states are interfering with attainment or maintenance of the 2008 and 2015 ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)

in New ~~York state:~~York: Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia. DEC is requesting the U.S. EPA to require sources of nitrogen oxides in the nine states to reduce such emissions. On May 4, 2018, citing Section 307(d)(10) of the CAA, the U.S. EPA issued a notice extending the deadline for the agency to respond to the petition until November 9, 2018. ~~The~~On May 20, 2019, U.S. EPA ~~indicated~~published a notice in the ~~extension is justified because more time is needed~~Federal Register in which it proposed to ~~review~~deny DEC’s 126(b) petition. The public comment period for the ~~petition and to solicit public comment.~~proposed action closed on July 15, 2019. On September 20, 2019, U.S. EPA ~~approval of~~signed a final rule denying the petition ~~could potentially result in increased capital and operating costs to our operations in the states identified in the petition.~~.

The CAA also requires the U.S. EPA to develop and implement NAAQS for criteria pollutants, which include, among others, particulate matter (PM) - consisting of PM₁₀ and PM_2.5, lead, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, SOsulfur dioxide (SO₂), and ozone.

In June 2010, the U.S. EPA significantly lowered the primary NAAQS for SO₂ from 140 parts per billion (ppb) on a 24-hour basis to an hourly standard of 75 ppb. Subsequently, ~~the~~ U.S. EPA designated the areas in which Great Lakes Works and Mon Valley Works facilities are located as nonattainment with the 2010 standard for the SO₂ NAAQS. The non-attainment designation requires the ~~facilities~~region to implement operational and/or capital improvements to demonstrate attainment with the 2010 standard. U. S. Steel worked with the Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) in developing a State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Allegheny County portion of the Pennsylvania SIP that includes reductions of SO₂ and improved dispersion from U. S. Steel sources. ~~The SIP is currently being reviewed by~~On November 19, 2018, U.S. EPA published a proposed rule to approve the ~~U.S. EPA.~~SIP. Comments on the proposed rule were accepted until December 19, 2018. In addition, as noted in the Legal Proceedings section, U. S. Steel continues to work with the regulatory authorities to address the Wayne County, Michigan (where Great Lakes Works is located) nonattainment status. The operational and financial impacts of the SO₂ NAAQS isare not estimated to be material at this time.

In October 2015, the U.S. EPA lowered the NAAQS for ozone from 75 ppb to 70 ppb. On November 6, 2017, the U.S. EPA designated most areas in which we operate as attainment with the 2015 standard. In a separate ruling, on June 4, 2018, the U.S. EPA designated other areas in which we operate as “marginal nonattainment” with the 2015 ozone standard. While on December 6, 2018, U.S. EPA published a final rule regarding implementation of the 2015 ozone standard. Because ~~any~~no state regulatory or permitting actions to bring the ozone nonattainment areas into attainment have yet to be proposed or developed for U. S. Steel facilities, the operational and financial impact of the ozone NAAQS cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.

On December 14, 2012, the U.S. EPA lowered the annual standard for PM_2.5 from 15 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) to 12 ug/m3, and retained the PM_2.5 24-hour and PM₁₀ NAAQS rules. In December 2014, the U.S. EPA designated some areas in which U. S. Steel operates as nonattainment with the 2012 annual PM_2.5 standard. On April 6, 2018, the U.S. EPA published a notice that Pennsylvania, California and Idaho failed to submit a SIP to demonstrate attainment with the 2012 fine particulate standard by the deadline established by the CAA. As a result of the notice, Pennsylvania, a state in which we operate, is required to submit a SIP to the U.S. EPA no later than November 7, 2019 to avoid sanctions. ~~Because it is early~~On April 29, 2019, the ACHD published a draft SIP for the Allegheny County nonattainment area which demonstrates that all of Allegheny County will meet its reasonable further progress requirements and be in attainment with the 2012 PM_2.5 annual and 24-hour NAAQS by December 31, 2021 with the existing controls that are in place. On September 12, 2019, the Allegheny County Board of Health unanimously approved the draft SIP. The draft SIP was then sent to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). After its review, PADEP will then send the SIP ~~development stages, any impacts~~ to ~~U. S. Steel cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.~~the U.S. EPA for approval.

In 2010, the U.S. EPA retained the annual nitrogen dioxide NAAQS standard, but created a new 1-hour NAAQS and established new data reduction and monitoring requirements. While the U.S. EPA has classified all areas as being in attainment or unclassifiable, it is requiring implementation of a network of monitoring stations to assess air quality. Until the network is implemented and further designations are made, the impact on operations at U. S. Steel facilities cannot be reasonably estimated.

In July 2018, the ACHD provided U. S. Steel, ACHD Regulation Subcommittee members and interested parties with draft regulations that would modify the existing air regulations applicable to coke plants in Allegheny County. While ACHD currently has some of the most stringent air regulations in the country governing coke plants, which apply to U. S. Steel’s coke plant in Clairton, Pennsylvania (the only remaining coke plant in Allegheny County and one of ~~two~~three remaining in Pennsylvania), the draft regulations would reduce the current allowable emissions from coke plant operations and would be more stringent than the Federal Best Available Control Technology and Lowest Achievable

Emission Rate requirements. In various meetings with ACHD, U. S. Steel has raised significant objections, in particular, that ACHD has not demonstrated that continuous compliance with the draft rule is economically and technologically feasible. While U. S. Steel continues to meet with ACHD regarding the draft rule, U. S. Steel ~~will take appropriate actions to ensure~~believes that any rule promulgated by ACHD ~~complies~~must comply with ~~their~~its statutory authority. ~~Adopting~~If the draft rule or similar rule ~~could be material~~is adopted, the financial and operational impacts to U. S. ~~Steel.~~Steel could be material. To assist in developing rules objectively and with technical justification, the June 27, 2019, Settlement Agreement, establishes procedures that would be used when developing a new rule. For further details on the June 27, 2019 Settlement Agreement with ACHD see "Item 1. Legal Proceedings - Environmental Proceedings - Mon Valley Works."

Environmental Remediation

In the United States, U. S. Steel has been identified as a potentially responsible party (PRP) at ~~eight~~seven sites under CERCLA as of September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Of these, there are three sites ~~where~~for which information requests have been received or there are other indications that U. S. Steel may be a PRP under CERCLA, but ~~where~~ sufficient information is not presently available to confirm the existence of liability or to make a reasonable estimate with respect to any potential liabilities. There are also 18 additional sites ~~where~~for which U. S. Steel may be liable for remediation costs in excess of $100,000 under other environmental statutes, both federal and state, or where private parties are seeking to impose liability on U. S. Steel for remediation costs through discussions or litigation. At many of these sites, U. S. Steel is one of a number of parties involved and the total cost of remediation, as well as U. S. Steel’s share, is frequently dependent upon the outcome of ongoing investigations and remedial studies. U. S. Steel accrues for environmental remediation activities when the responsibility to remediate is probable and the amount of associated costs is reasonably estimable. As environmental remediation matters proceed toward ultimate resolution or as remediation obligations arise, charges in excess of those previously accrued may be required.

For further discussion of relevant environmental matters, see ~~"Part II. Other information - Item~~"Item 1. Legal Proceedings - Environmental Proceedings."

The total accrual for such liabilities at September 30, 2018 was $177 million. These amounts exclude liabilities related to asset retirement obligations, disclosed in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

U. S. Steel is the subject of, or a party to, a number of pending or threatened legal actions, contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters, including laws and regulations relating to the environment. The ultimate resolution of these contingencies could, individually or in the aggregate, be material to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

U. S. Steel did not enter into any new material off-balance sheet arrangements during the third quarter of ~~2018.~~

~~GUIDANCE~~

Market conditions remain solid, with stable end-user steel consumption. We experienced lower customer order rates for an extended period, driven by falling spot and index prices. However, we expect continued strength in steel demand will support favorable market conditions as we enter 2019.

We expect results for our Flat-rolled segment to continue to improve primarily due to increased shipments and lower maintenance and outage costs, partially offset by lower average realized prices. Despite a softening in the energy tubulars market, we expect a slight improvement in Tubular segment results primarily due to increased shipments, partially offset by lower average realized prices. We expect results for our European segment to decrease primarily due to inventory revaluation adjustments related to raw material price volatility.

~~We currently expect fourth quarter 2018 adjusted EBITDA to be approximately $575 million, which would result in full-year 2018 adjusted EBITDA of approximately $1.8 billion.~~

~~Please refer to the table below for the reconciliation of Guidance net earnings to adjusted EBITDA.~~

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED EBITDA GUIDANCE ^(a)
Quarter Ended Year Ended
December 31, December 31,
(Dollars in millions) 2018 2018
Reconciliation to Projected Adjusted EBITDA Included in Guidance
Projected net earnings attributable to United States Steel Corporation included in Guidance $ 349
$ 872
Estimated income tax expense 30
66
Estimated net interest and other financial costs 75
327
Estimated depreciation, depletion and amortization 136
520
Gain on equity investee transactions (20 ) (38 )
Granite City Works restart costs 5
68
Granite City works adjustment to temporary idling charges —
(8 )
Projected adjusted EBITDA included in Guidance $ 575
$ 1,807

^(a) ~~Note: projected adjusted EBITDA included in Guidance excludes one-time costs resulting from the future ratification of a new collective bargaining agreement.~~

We present earnings (loss) before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) and adjusted EBITDA, which are non-GAAP measures, as additional measurements to enhance the understanding of our operating performance. We believe that EBITDA, considered along with net earnings (loss), is a relevant indicator of trends relating to our operating performance and provides management and investors with additional information for comparison of our operating results to the operating results of other companies.

Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure that excludes the effects of gains on the sale of ownership interests in equity investees, facility restart costs and significant temporary idling charges. We present adjusted EBITDA to enhance the understanding of our ongoing operating performance and established trends affecting our core operations, by excluding the effects of items such as gains on the sale of ownership interests in equity investees, facility restart costs and significant temporary idling charges that can obscure underlying trends. U. S. Steel's management considers adjusted EBITDA as an alternative measure of operating performance and not as an alternative measure of the Company's liquidity. U. S. Steel’s management considers adjusted EBITDA useful to investors by facilitating a comparison of our operating performance to the operating performance of our competitors. Additionally, the presentation of adjusted EBITDA provides insight into management’s view and assessment of the Company’s ongoing operating performance, because management does not consider the adjusting items when evaluating the Company’s financial performance or in preparing the Company’s annual financial Guidance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered a substitute for net earnings (loss) or other financial measures as computed in accordance with U.S. GAAP and is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.

~~LABOR AGREEMENT~~

On October 15, 2018, U. S. Steel and the United Steelworkers (USW) reached a tentative agreement on successor four-year Collective Bargaining Agreements covering approximately 14,000 USW-represented employees at all of the company’s domestic flat-rolled and iron ore mining facilities as well as tubular operations in Fairfield, Alabama, Lorain, Ohio, and Lone Star, Texas. The tentative agreements remain subject to ratification, which is anticipated to be completed by the end of November of 2018.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

U. S. Steel continues to face import competition, much of which is ~~unfairly-traded,~~unfairly traded, supported by foreign governments, and fueled by massive global steel overcapacity. ~~Such~~ These imports, as well as the underlying policies/practices ~~policies,~~ and overcapacity, impact the Company’s operational and financial performance. U. S. Steel continues to lead the industry in efforts to address ~~dumped and subsidized imports and global overcapacity~~these challenges that threaten the Company, our workers, our ~~shareholders,~~stockholders, and our country’s national and economic security.

~~U. S. Steel continues~~As of the date of this filing, pursuant to actively defend and maintain the 54 antidumping and countervailing (antisubsidy) duty orders covering products U. S. Steel produces in proceedings before the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC), U.S. International Trade Commission, the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the World Trade Organization (WTO).

~~Through~~ a series of Presidential Proclamations ~~pursuant to~~issued in accordance with Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, ~~as of October 31, 2018,~~ U.S. imports of certain steel products are subject to a 25 percent tariff, except for imports from: (1) ~~Turkey, which are subject to a 50 percent tariff; (2)~~ Argentina, Brazil, and South Korea, which are subject to restrictive quotas; (2) Canada and Mexico, which are currently not subject to either tariffs or quotas but tariffs could be re-imposed on surging product groups after consultations; and (3) Australia, which is not subject to ~~either~~ tariffs, quotas, or ~~quotas.~~ an anti-surge mechanism.

The ~~DOC~~U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) is managing a process in which U.S. companies may request and/or oppose temporary product exclusions from the Section 232 tariffs or quotas. Over ~~30,000~~93,000 exclusions have been ~~requested.~~requested for steel products. U. S. Steel is ~~actively~~ opposing exclusion requests for products that are the same as, or ~~similar~~substitute products tofor, those produced by U. S. ~~Steel produces.~~Steel.

Several legal challenges and retaliatory trade measures ~~and retaliation actions~~ have been initiated in response to the Section 232 ~~action on steel. In the U.S., the~~action. The American Institute for International Steel’s ~~constitutional challenge to~~appeal of the March 2019 U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) decision upholding the constitutionality of the Section 232 statute ~~filed in June 2018~~is pending before the ~~CIT is~~U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). In July 2019, JSW Steel Ltd (JSW) filed a complaint against the DOC in the ~~briefing stage.~~CIT, challenging the DOC’s denial of its Section 232 exclusion requests for semi-finished steel products, which were opposed by U. S. Steel and other domestic steel producers. Multiple countries have challenged the Section 232 action at the ~~WTO~~World Trade Organization (WTO), imposed retaliatory tariffs, and/or ~~imposed retaliatory tariffs. Mexico imposed a 25 percent tariff on imports of U.S.~~acted to safeguard their domestic steel ~~and other products in June 2018. Canada imposed a countermeasure surtax of 25 percent on imports of U.S.~~industries from increased steel and other products in July 2018 and imposed a provisional safeguard in the form of tariff rate quotas (TRQs; 25 percent tariffs on imports that exceed the quota) on certain steel products in October 2018. The European Union imposed 25 percent retaliatory tariffs on imports of U.S. steel and other products in June 2018 and imposed a provisional TRQ safeguard on global steel imports in July 2018.imports. In ~~response,~~turn, the United States has challenged the ~~above~~ retaliation at the WTO. Decisions in these WTO disputes are not expected until the fourth quarter of 2019, at the earliest.

~~Following~~

Since its implementation in March 2018, the Section 232 action has supported the U.S. steel industry's and U. S. Steel’s multiple restarts and investment initiatives. The Company continues to actively defend the Section 232 action through all available tools and strategies, including by highlighting these benefits and the importance of maintaining the Section 232 action.

In February 2019, the European Commission (EC) imposed a definitive tariff rate quota (TRQ) safeguard on certain steel imports: 25 percent tariffs on certain steel imports that exceed quotas based on 105 percent of average import volumes for 2015-2017 and automatically increasing 5 percent annually, effective February 2019 through June 2021. In July 2019, the automatic 5 percent quota increase went into effect, despite opposition from the EU steel industry and the EC’s ongoing annual review of the measures. In September 2019, the EC completed its review, announcing several revisions to the safeguard, including a reduction of the annual quota increase to 3 percent and tightening of certain product-specific quotas, effective October 1, 2019.

Antidumping (AD) and countervailing (CVD or antisubsidy) duties apply in addition to the Section 232 tariffs and quotas and the EC’s TRQ safeguard, and AD/CVD orders will last beyond the Section 232 action and EC’s TRQ safeguard. Thus, U. S. Steel continues to actively defend and maintain the 54 U.S. AD/CVD orders and 11 EU AD/CVD orders covering products U. S. Steel produces in multiple proceedings before the DOC, U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), CIT, CAFC, the EC and European courts, and the WTO.

In 2018, following an investigation of China’s technology transfer and intellectual property violations by the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, the United States imposed tariffs on approximately $250 billion of U.S. imports from China, including finished steel couplings, ~~and~~ some products used in steel production, ~~are subject to~~and certain downstream products. The original 10 to 25 percent ~~tariffs.~~tariffs on these products were uniformly 25 percent by May 2019. In September 2019, USTR announced that 15 percent tariffs would be imposed in two stages on all remaining imports from China, with the first set of 15 percent tariffs taking effect on September 1, 2019, and the remaining 15 percent tariffs taking effect December 15, 2019. The United States continues to negotiate with China on structural trade issues, including China's subsidies and government support of its steel industry.

~~On September 30, 2018,~~The G-20’s Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity continues to work to reduce global steel overcapacity, currently estimated at 440 million metric tons. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Steel Committee and trilateral negotiations between the United States, ~~Canada,~~EU, and ~~Mexico agreed in principle~~Japan also continue to the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), a new free trade agreement that is intended to replace the current North American Free Trade Agreement. USMCA contains several new provisions designed to increase the use of USMCA-originaddress global steel and increase trade enforcement coordination among the three countries. To become law, USMCA must be ratified and implemented by the three governments. The agreement in principle to USMCA does not change the current Section 232 steel action or retaliation thereto.overcapacity.

U. S. Steel ~~continues~~will continue to execute a broad, global strategy to maximize opportunities and navigate challenges presented by imports, global steel overcapacity, and international trade law and policy developments.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

See Notes 2 and 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.



Item 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There were no material changes in U. S. Steel's exposure to market risk from December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.



Item 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

U. S. Steel has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019. These disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that were designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that are filed with or submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission are: (1) accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures and (2) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable law and regulations. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019, U. S. Steel’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There have not been any changes in U. S. Steel’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this quarterly report, which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, U. S. Steel’s internal control over financial reporting.

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION

SUPPLEMENTAL STATISTICS (Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,							Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2018			2017			2018			2017			(Dollars in millions)	2019			2018			2019			2018
SEGMENT EARNINGS (LOSS) BEFORE INTEREST AND INCOME TAXES:													SEGMENT EARNINGS (LOSS) BEFORE INTEREST AND INCOME TAXES:
Flat-Rolled	$	305		$	161		$	562		$	293		Flat-Rolled	$	46		$	305		$	275		$	562
U. S. Steel Europe	72			73			297			215			U. S. Steel Europe	(46		)	72			(27		)	297
Tubular	7			(7		)	(55		)	(93		)	Tubular	(25		)	7			(21		)	(55		)
Total reportable segments	384			227			804			415
													Total reportable segments	(25		)	384			227			804
Other Businesses	16			12			44			34			Other Businesses	8			16			26			44
Items not allocated to segments:													Items not allocated to segments:
Gain on equity investee transactions	—			21			18			21
Granite City Works restart costs	(27		)	—			(63		)	—
Granite City Works adjustment to temporary idling charges	—			—			8			—
Gain associated with retained interest in U. S. Steel Canada Inc.	—			—			—			72
Loss on shutdown of certain tubular assets	—			—			—			(35		)
Total earnings before interest and income taxes	$	373		$	260		$	811		$	507
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
													December 24, 2018 Clairton coke making facility fire	(9		)	—			(53		)	—
													Restructuring charges	(54		)	—			(54		)	—
													Gain on equity investee transactions	—			—			—			18
													Granite City Works restart costs	—			(27		)	—			(63		)
													Granite City Works adjustment to temporary idling charges	—			—			—			8
Total (loss) earnings before interest and income taxes													Total (loss) earnings before interest and income taxes	$	(80	)	$	373		$	146		$	811
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES (dollars in millions)													CAPITAL EXPENDITURES (dollars in millions)
Flat-Rolled	$	213		$	134		531			206			Flat-Rolled	$	263		$	213		$	764		$	531
U. S. Steel Europe	25			28			63			62			U. S. Steel Europe	36			25			111			63
Tubular	9			8			33			19			Tubular	49			9			97			33
Other Businesses	18			1			19			4			Other Businesses	2			18			6			19
Total	$	265		$	171		$	646		$	291
													Total	$	350		$	265		$	978		$	646
OPERATING STATISTICS													OPERATING STATISTICS
Average realized price: ($/net ton) ^(a)
Flat-Rolled	$	859		$	728		807			730
U. S. Steel Europe	669			639			695			617
Tubular	1,602			1,433			1,477			1,268
Steel Shipments:^(a)(b)
Flat-Rolled	2,659			2,544			7,777			7,445
U. S. Steel Europe	1,101			1,067			3,384			3,333
Tubular	184			185			564			509
Intersegment Shipments:^(b)
Flat-Rolled to Tubular	26			43			158			137
U. S. Steel Europe to Flat-Rolled	—			—			22			47
Raw Steel Production:^(b)
Flat-Rolled	2,933			2,821			8,558			8,247
U. S. Steel Europe	1,210			1,235			3,810			3,778
Raw Steel Capability Utilization: ^(c)
Flat-Rolled	68		%	66		%	67		%	65		%
U. S. Steel Europe	96		%	98		%	102		%	101		%
Average realized price: ($/net ton unless otherwise noted)^(a)													Average realized price: ($/net ton unless otherwise noted)^(a)
													Flat-Rolled	$	732		$	859		$	771		$	807
													U. S. Steel Europe	656			669			660			695
													U. S. Steel Europe (€/net ton)	590			575			587			582
													Tubular	1,417			1,602			1,501			1,477
Steel shipments (thousands of net tons):^(a)													Steel shipments (thousands of net tons):^(a)
													Flat-Rolled	2,654			2,659			8,183			7,777
													U. S. Steel Europe	765			1,101			2,833			3,384
													Tubular	174			184			576			564
Intersegment steel (unless otherwise noted) shipments (thousands of net tons):													Intersegment steel (unless otherwise noted) shipments (thousands of net tons):
													Flat-Rolled to Tubular	79			26			212			158
													Flat-Rolled to U. S. Steel Europe (iron ore pellets and fines)	235			—			424			—
													U. S. Steel Europe to Flat-Rolled	—			—			—			22
Raw steel production (thousands of net tons):													Raw steel production (thousands of net tons):
													Flat-Rolled	2,783			2,933			8,842			8,558
													U. S. Steel Europe	823			1,210			3,130			3,810
Raw steel capability utilization:^(b)													Raw steel capability utilization:^(b)
													Flat-Rolled	65		%	68		%	70		%	67		%
													U. S. Steel Europe	65		%	96		%	84		%	102		%


^(a)Excludes intersegment transfers. ^(b)Based on annual raw steel production capability of 17.0 million net tons for Flat-Rolled and 5.0 million net tons for USSE. ^(a)	~~Excludes intersegment transfers.~~


^(b)	~~Thousands of net tons.~~


^(c)	~~Based on annual raw steel production capability of 17.0 million net tons for Flat-Rolled and 5.0 million net tons for USSE.~~

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

GENERAL LITIGATION

On April 11, 2017, there was a process waste water release at our Midwest Plant (Midwest) in Portage, Indiana that impacted a water outfall that discharges to Burns Waterway near Lake Michigan. U. S. Steel identified the source of the release and made the necessary repairs. We determined that all repairs were safely working as intended and, on April 14, 2017, resumed operations in a controlled, phased and highly monitored approach with extensive input from participating government agencies. The Company has since implemented substantial operational, process and notification improvements at Midwest. The Company has been presented with cost reimbursements, loss of use and penalty requests from the involved governmental agencies. In January of 2018, The Surfrider Foundation and the City of Chicago initiated suits in the Northern District of Indiana alleging ~~CWA~~Clean Water Act (CWA) and Permit violations at Midwest. On April 2, 2018, the U.S. EPA and the State of Indiana initiated a separate action against the Company and lodged a Consent Decree negotiated between U. S. Steel and the relevant governmental agencies consisting of all material terms to resolve the CWA and ~~NPDES~~National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System violations at the Midwest Plant. A public comment period for the Consent Decree ensued. ~~U. S. Steel, U.S. EPA~~The suits that the Surfrider Foundation and the ~~State~~City of ~~Indiana continue to review those comments.~~Chicago filed are currently stayed. The Surfrider Foundation and the City of Chicago ~~initially agreed to stay their actions pending finalization of the Consent Decree, but~~also filed ~~a motion to lift that stay in July 2018. On September 13, 2018, both The Surfrider Foundation and the City of Chicago filed~~ motions, which were granted, to intervene in the Consent Decree ~~case which remain pending.~~

case. U. S. Steel continues to work with United States Department of Justice, U.S. EPA, and Indiana Department of Environmental Management towards a finalized Consent Decree.

On ~~August 9, 2017,~~November 30, 2018, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) issued ~~rulemaking proposals~~a new Water Discharge Permit for the Minntac Tailings Basin waters. The Permit contains new sulfate limitations applicable to ~~replace~~water in the ~~current sulfate standard with an equation-based standard. As part of~~Tailings Basin and groundwater flowing from U. S. Steel’s property. The MPCA also acted on the ~~rulemaking process, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) was appointed to preside over public hearings~~same date, denying the Company’s requests for variances from ground and ~~comments. The Company and others challenged the~~surface water standards and ~~presented evidence that~~request for a contested case hearing. U. S. Steel filed appeals with the ~~standards were unsupported by science and that~~Minnesota Court of Appeals on December 19, 2018 challenging the MPCA failed to consider associated costs as part of the rulemaking process. On January 9, 2018, the ALJ rejected the MPCA’s proposals, concluding that the MPCA failed to comply with state law requirements for drafting and adopting a new standard, that portions of the rule were unsupportedactions taken by the ~~MPCA’s evidence~~MPCA. Separate appeals have been filed by a Minnesota Native American Tribe (Fond du Lac Band) and that the MPCA proposal was unconstitutional due to vagueness. On March 28, 2018, the MPCA submitted comments to the Chief ALJ seeking revisions to these determinations. The ALJ has not reversed the decision and the litigation on this matter has ended. However, the Minnesota Governor rejected any new wild rice legislation and by Executive Order created a ~~new "Wild Rice Task Force." This Task Force is to issue a new wild rice report by the end of December 2018.~~nonprofit environmental group (Water Legacy). U. S. Steel has ~~representation on this Task Force.~~filed Petitions to Intervene in both cases. The briefing is now complete and the matter is pending a determination by the Court.

On October 2, 2017, an Amended Shareholder Class Action Complaint was filed in Federal Court in the Western District of Pennsylvania consolidating previously-filed actions. Separately, ~~four~~five related shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in State and Federal courts in Pittsburgh, ~~Pennsylvania.~~Pennsylvania and the Delaware Court of Chancery. The underlying consolidated class action lawsuit alleges that U. S. Steel, certain current and former officers, an upper level manager of the Company and the financial underwriters who participated in the August 2016 secondary public offering of the Company's common stock (collectively, Defendants) violated federal securities laws in making false statements and/or failing to discover and disclose material information regarding the financial condition of the Company. The lawsuit claims that this conduct caused a prospective class of plaintiffs to sustain damages during the period from January 27, 2016 to April 25, 2017 as a result of the prospective class purchasing the Company's common stock at artificially inflated prices and/or suffering losses when the price of the common stock dropped. The derivative lawsuits generally make the same allegations against the same officers and also allege that certain current and former members of the Board of Directors failed to exercise appropriate control and oversight over the Company and were unjustly compensated. The plaintiffs seek to recover losses that were allegedly sustained. The class action Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims. On September 29, 2018 the Court ruled on those motions granting them in part and denying them in part. On March 18, 2019, the plaintiffs withdrew the claims against the Defendants related to the 2016 secondary offering. As a result, the underwriters are no longer parties to the case. Plaintiffs have moved to certify the class of claimants which is being challenged by the remaining Defendants. The Company isand the individual defendants are vigorously defending the remaining claims.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEEDINGS

The following is a summary of the proceedings of U. S. Steel that were pending or contemplated as of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, under federal and state environmental laws. Information about specific sites where U. S. Steel is or has been engaged in significant clean up or remediation activities is also summarized below. Except as described herein, it is not possible to accurately predict the ultimate outcome of these matters.

CERCLA Remediation Sites

Claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) have been raised with respect to the cleanup of various waste disposal and other sites. Under CERCLA, potentially responsible parties (PRPs) for a site include current owners and operators, past owners and operators at the time of disposal, persons who arranged for disposal of a hazardous substance at a site, and persons who transported a hazardous substance to a site. CERCLA imposes strict and joint and several liabilities. Because of various factors, including the ambiguity of the regulations, the difficulty of identifying the responsible parties for any particular site, the complexity of determining the relative liability among them, the uncertainty as to the most desirable remediation techniques, and the amount of damages and cleanup costs and the time period during which such costs may be incurred, we are unable to reasonably estimate U. S. Steel’s ultimate liabilities under CERCLA.

As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, U. S. Steel has received information requests or been identified as a PRP at a total of ~~eight~~seven CERCLA sites, three of which have liabilities that have not been resolved. Based on currently available information, which is in many cases preliminary and incomplete, management believes that U. S. Steel’s liability for CERCLA cleanup and remediation costs at the other ~~five~~four sites will be between $100,000 and $1 million for 4three of the sites, and over $5 million for 1one site as described below.

Duluth Works

The former U. S. Steel Duluth Works site was placed on the National Priorities List under CERCLA in 1983 and on the State of Minnesota’s Superfund list in 1984. Liability for environmental remediation at the site is governed by a Response Order by Consent executed with the MPCA in 1985 and a Record of Decision signed by MPCA in 1989. U. S. Steel has partnered with the Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO) of U.S. EPA Region 5 to address contaminated sediments in the St. Louis River Estuary and several other Operable Units that could impact the Estuary if not addressed. An amendment to the Project Agreement between U. S. Steel and GLNPO was executed during the second quarter of 2018 to recognize the costs associated with implementing the proposed remedial plan at the site.

While work continues on completion of the remedial design, permitting and educating the public and key stakeholders on the details of the plan, there has been no material change in the status of the project during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Additional study, investigation, design, oversight costs, and implementation of U. S. Steel's preferred remedial alternatives on the upland property and Estuary are currently estimated as of September 30, ~~2018~~2019 at approximately ~~$46~~$45 million.

~~RCRA~~Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) and Other Remediation Sites

U. S. Steel may be liable for remediation costs under other environmental statutes, both federal and state, or where private parties are seeking to impose liability on U. S. Steel for remediation costs through discussions or litigation. There are 18 such sites where remediation is being sought involving amounts in excess of $100,000. Based on currently available information, which is in many cases preliminary and incomplete, management believes that liability for cleanup and remediation costs in connection with eight sites have potential costs between $100,000 and $1 million per site, five sites may involve remediation costs between $1 million and $5 million per site and five sites are estimated to or could have, costs for remediation, investigation, restoration or compensation in excess of $5 million per site.

For more information on the status of remediation activities at U. S. Steel’s significant sites, see the discussions related to each site below.

Gary Works

On October 23, 1998, the U.S. EPA issued a final Administrative Order on Consent (Order) addressing Corrective Action for Solid Waste Management Units (SWMU) throughout Gary Works. This Order requires U. S. Steel to perform a ~~Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)~~RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI), a Corrective Measures Study (CMS) and Corrective Measure Implementation. ~~While work continues~~Evaluations are underway at six groundwater areas on ~~several items, there has been no material change in~~ the ~~status~~east side of the ~~project during~~facility and it is likely that corrective measures will be required, but it is not possible at this time to define a scope or estimate costs for what may be required by the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2018.~~U.S. EPA. Until the remaining Phase I work and Phase II field investigations are completed, it is not possible to assess what additional expenditures will be necessary for Corrective Action projects at Gary Works. In total, the accrued liability for Corrective Action projects is approximately ~~$26~~$25 million as of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, based on our current estimate of known remaining costs. Significant additional costs associated with the six groundwater areas at this site

are possible and are referenced in Note 23 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements “Contingencies and Commitments - Environmental Matters - Remediation Projects - Projects with Ongoing Study and Scope Development.”

Geneva Works

At U. S. Steel’s former Geneva Works, liability for environmental remediation, including the closure of three hazardous waste impoundments and facility-wide corrective action, has been allocated between U. S. Steel and the current property owner pursuant to an agreement and a permit issued by the Utah Department of Environmental Quality (UDEQ). Having completed the investigation on a majority of the remaining areas identified in the permit, U. S. Steel has determined the most effective means to address the remaining impacted material is to manage those materials in a previously approved on-site Corrective Action Management Unit (CAMU). ~~While preliminary approval~~U. S. Steel awarded a contract for the implementation of the ~~conceptual~~ CAMU ~~design has been granted by the UDEQ, there has been no material change in the status of the~~ project during the ~~nine months ended September 30,~~fourth quarter of 2018. Construction, waste stabilization and placement along with closure of the CAMU are expected to be complete in 2020. U. S. Steel has an accrued liability of approximately ~~$62~~$50 million as of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, for our estimated share of the remaining costs of remediation.

USS-POSCO Industries (UPI)

A joint venture in Pittsburg, California between subsidiaries of U. S. Steel and POSCO, UPI's facilities were previously owned and operated solely by U. S. Steel which retains primary responsibility for the existing environmental conditions. ~~Work~~U. S. Steel continues to monitor the impacts of the remedial plan implemented in 2016 to address groundwater impacts from trichloroethylene at SWMU 4. Evaluations continue for the ~~three~~ SWMUs known as the Northern Boundary Group and it is likely that corrective measures will be required, but it is not possible at this time to define a scope or estimate costs for what may be required by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control. As such, there has been no material change in the status of the project during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, approximately $1 million has been accrued for ongoing environmental studies, investigations and remedy monitoring. Significant additional costs associated with this site are possible and are referenced in Note 2223 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements “Contingencies and Commitments - Environmental Matters - Remediation Projects - Projects with Ongoing Study and Scope Development.”

Fairfield Works

A consent decree was signed by U. S. Steel, the ~~U.S.~~U.S EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice and filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (United States of America v. USX Corporation) in December 1997. In accordance with the consent decree, U. S. Steel initiated a RCRA corrective action program at the Fairfield Works facility. The Alabama Department of Environmental Management, with the approval of the ~~U.S.~~U.S EPA, assumed primary responsibility for regulation and oversight of the RCRA corrective action program at Fairfield Works. While work continues on different aspects of the program, there has been no material change in the status of the project during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. In total, the accrued liability for remaining work under the Corrective Action Program, was approximately ~~$252,000~~$213,000 at September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Significant additional costs associated with this site are possible and are referenced in Note 2223 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements “Contingencies and Commitments - Environmental Matters - Remediation Projects - Projects with Ongoing Study and Scope Development.”

Fairless Plant

In April 1993, U. S. Steel entered into a consent order with the ~~U.S.~~U.S EPA pursuant to RCRA, under which U. S. Steel would perform Interim Measures (IM), an RFI and CMS at our Fairless Plant. A Phase I RFI Final Report was submitted in September of 1997. With ~~U.S.~~U.S EPA’s agreement, in lieu of conducting subsequent phases of the RFI and the CMS, U. S. Steel has been working through the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection Act 2 Program to characterize and remediate facility parcels for redevelopment. While work continues on these items, there has been no material change in the status of the project during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the accrued liability to maintain the interim measures, and clear properties through the Act 2 process is approximately ~~$189,000.~~$141,000. Significant additional costs associated with this site are possible and are referenced in Note 2223 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements “Contingencies and Commitments - Environmental Matters - Remediation Projects - Projects with Ongoing Study and Scope Development.”

Lorain Tubular Operations

In September 2006, U. S. Steel and the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) commenced discussions about RCRA Corrective Action at Lorain Tubular Operations. A Phase I RFI on the identified SWMUs and Areas of Contamination was submitted in March 2012. While discussions continue with OEPA on ~~finalizing~~drafting the Statement of Basis identifying potential remedies to address areas documented in the Phase II RFI, ~~report that addresses additional investigations of soil, site wide groundwater and the pipe mill lagoon,~~ there has been no material change in the status of the project during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, costs to complete additional projects are estimated to be approximately ~~$98,000.~~$79,000. Significant additional costs associated with this site are possible and are referenced in Note 2223 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements “Contingencies and Commitments - Environmental Matters - Remediation Projects - Projects with Ongoing Study and Scope Development.”

Joliet Works

The 50-acre parcel at the former Joliet Works is enrolled in the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency’s (IEPA) voluntary Site Remediation Program (the Program). The Program requires investigation and establishment of cleanup objectives followed by submission/approval of a Remedial Action Plan to meet those objectives. The 50-acre parcel was divided into four subareas with remedial activities completed in 2015 for three of the subareas. While work continues to define the requirements for further investigation of the remaining subarea, there has been no material change in the status of the project during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. U. S. Steel has an accrued liability of ~~$287,000~~$273,000 as of September 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Significant additional costs associated with this site are possible and are referenced in Note 2223 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements “Contingencies and Commitments - Environmental Matters - Remediation Projects - Projects with Ongoing Study and Scope Development.”

Cherryvale (KS) Zinc

In April 2003, U. S. Steel and Salomon Smith Barney Holdings, Inc. (SSB) entered into a Consent Order with the Kansas Department of Health & Environment (KDHE) concerning a former zinc smelting operation in Cherryvale, Kansas. Remediation of the site proper was essentially completed in 2007. The Consent Order was amended on May 3, 2013, to require investigation (but not remediation) of potential contamination beyond the boundary of the former zinc smelting operation. On November 22, 2016, KDHE approved a State Cooperative Final Agency Decision Statement that identified the remedy selected to address potential contamination beyond the boundary of the former zinc smelting site. The Removal Action Design Plan was approved during the second quarter of ~~2018,~~2018. The Waste Deposition Area design and ~~work continues on finalizing~~ the Interim Risk Management Plan (which includes institutional ~~controls required under~~controls) were approved by KDHE during the ~~Plan. Negotiations~~fourth quarter of an2018. An amended consent order for remediation ~~is scheduled to commence~~was signed in ~~the fourth quarter~~May 2019 and a remediation contract was executed in June 2019.U. S. Steel has an accrued liability of ~~2018.~~Asapproximately $10 million as of September 30, ~~2018, an accrual~~2019, for our estimated share of ~~approximately $220,000 remains available for addressing these outstanding issues. Significant additional costs associated with this site are possible and are referenced in Note 22 to~~ the ~~Consolidated Financial Statements “Contingencies and Commitments - Environmental Matters - Remediation Projects - Projects with Ongoing Study and Scope Development.”~~cost of remediation.

South Works

On August 29, 2017, U. S. Steel was notified by the U.S. Coast Guard of a sheen on the water in the North Vessel Slip at our former South Works in Chicago, Illinois. U. S. Steel has been working with the IEPA under their voluntary Site Remediation Program since 1993 to evaluate the condition of the property including the North Vessel Slip. The result of this cooperative effort has been the issuance of a series of “No Further Remediation” (NFR) notices to U. S. Steel including one specific to the North Vessel Slip. U. S. Steel has notified the IEPA of the potential changed condition and is working closely with the IEPA and the U. S. Coast Guard to determine the source of the sheen and options to address the issue. U. S. Steel has an accrued liability of ~~$25,000~~$285,000 as of September 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

Air Related Matters

Great Lakes Works

In June 2010, the ~~U.S.~~ EPA significantly lowered the primary ~~National Ambient Air Quality Standards~~ (NAAQS) for SO₂ from 140 ~~parts per billion (ppb)~~ppb on a 24-hour basis to an hourly standard of 75 ppb. Based upon the 2009-2011 ambient

air monitoring data, the U.S. EPA designated the area in which Great Lakes Works is located as nonattainment with the 2010 SO₂ NAAQS.

As a result, pursuant to the CAA, the Michigan Department of ~~Environmental Quality (MDEQ)~~Environment, Great Lakes and Energy (EGLE) was required to submit a SIP to the U.S. EPA that demonstrates that the entire nonattainment area (and not just the monitor) would be in attainment by October 2018 by using conservative air dispersion modeling. To develop the SIP, U. S. Steel met with ~~MDEQ~~EGLE on multiple occasions and had offered reduction plans to ~~MDEQ~~EGLE but the parties could not agree to a plan. ~~MDEQ,~~EGLE, instead promulgated Rule 430 which was solely directed at U. S. Steel. The Company challenged Rule 430 before the Michigan Court of Claims who by Order dated October 4, 2017, granted the Company’s motion for summary disposition voiding Rule 430 finding that it violated rule-making provisions of the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act and Michigan Constitution. Since Rule 430 has been invalidated and ~~MDEQ's~~EGLE's SIP has not been approved, U.S. EPA has indicated that it would promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) pursuant to its obligations and authority under the ~~Clean Air Act.~~CAA. Because development of the FIP is in the early stages, the impacts of the nonattainment designation to the Company are not estimable at this time.

On ~~October 8, 2018,~~January 17, 2019, U. S. Steel ~~received a Violation Notice from MDEQ~~and EGLE met to discuss resolution of violations that were alleged to have occurred intermittently in ~~which MDEQ alleges that U. S. Steel exceeded~~2017 and 2018 regarding opacity from: the D4 Blast Furnace slag pit, D4 Blast Furnace backdraft stack, B2 Blast Furnace casthouse roof monitor, B2 Blast Furnace backdraft stack, and Basic Oxygen Furnace Shop Roof Monitor; and exceedances of applicable limits at the pickle ~~line based upon the results of a stack test conducted in April 2018.~~line. More recently, EGLE advised U. S. Steel ~~is responding to the MDEQ with information regarding improvements made at the pickle line and related equipment since April 2018. No~~that it was assessing a civil penalty ~~has been assessed.~~

~~On January 31, 2018,~~of approximately $380,000 for these alleged violations. U. S. Steel received a Violation Notice from MDEQ in which MDEQ alleges that U. S. Steel exceeded the applicable six-minute opacity standard at the B2 Blast Furnace Casthouse on October 25, 2017. U. S. Steel respondedand EGLE continue to ~~the notice on February 21, 2018. No penalty has been assessed.~~negotiate resolution.

On May 27, 2015, Great Lakes Works received a Violation Notice in which MDEQ alleged that U. S. Steel did not obtain a required permit to install a BOP vessel replacement that occurred in November 2014. U. S. Steel responded to MDEQ on June 17, 2015. While the resolution of the matter is uncertain at this time, it is not anticipated that the resolution will be material to U. S. Steel.

Granite City Works

In October 2015, Granite City Works received a Violation Notice from IEPA in which the IEPA alleges that U. S. Steel violated the emission limits for nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds from the Basic Oxygen Furnace Electrostatic Precipitator Stack. In addition, the IEPA alleges that U. S. Steel exceeded its natural gas usage limit at its CoGeneration Boiler. U. S. Steel responded to the notice and is currently discussing resolution of the matter with IEPA.

Although discussions with IEPA regarding the foregoing alleged violations are ongoing and the resolution of these matters is uncertain at this time, it is not anticipated that the result of those discussions will be material to U. S. Steel.

Minnesota Ore Operations

On February 6, 2013, the U.S. EPA published a FIP that applies to taconite facilities in Minnesota. The FIP establishes and requires emission limits and the use of low NOx reduction technology on indurating furnaces as Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART). While U. S. Steel installed low NOx burners on three furnaces at Minntac and is currently obligated to install low NOx burners on the two other furnaces at Minntac pursuant to existing agreements and permits, the rule would require the installation of a low NOx burner on the one furnace at Keetac for which U. S. Steel did not have an otherwise existing obligation. U. S. Steel estimates expenditures associated with the installation of low NOx burners of as much as $25 to $30 million. In 2013, U. S. Steel filed a petition for administrative reconsideration to the U.S. EPA and a petition for judicial review of the 2013 FIP and denial of the Minnesota SIP to the Eighth Circuit. In April 2016, the ~~U.S.~~ EPA promulgated a revised FIP with the same substantive requirements for U. S. Steel. In June 2016, U. S. Steel filed a petition for administrative reconsideration of the 2016 FIP to the U.S. EPA and a petition for judicial review of the 2016 FIP before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. While the proceedings regarding the petition for judicial review of the 2013 FIP remained stayed, oral arguments regarding the petition for judicial review of the 2016 FIP were heard by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals on November 15, 2017. Thus, both petitions for judicial review remain with the Eighth Circuit. On December 4, 2017, U.S. EPA published a notification in the Federal Register in which the U.S. EPA denied U. S. Steel’s administrative petitions for reconsideration and stay of the 2013 FIP and 2016 FIP. On February 1, 2018, U. S. Steel filed a petition for judicial review of U.S. EPA’s denial of the administrative petitions for reconsideration to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. U.S. EPA and U. S. Steel ~~continues~~reached a settlement regarding the five indurating lines at Minntac. Notice of a 30-day comment period of the settlement agreement was published in the September 11, 2019, Federal Register. The comment period expired on October 11, 2019. U. S. Steel will work with U.S. EPA to ~~defend its three petitions~~address any comments. U. S. Steel and U.S. EPA continue to negotiate resolution for Keetac.

~~that are before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding BART requirements at Minntac and Keetac while pursuing a resolution that would include an equitable revision to the FIP.~~

Mon Valley Works

On November 9, 2017, U.S. EPA Region III and ~~ACHD~~the Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) jointly issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) regarding the Company’s Edgar Thomson facility in Braddock, PA. In addition, on November 20, 2017, ACHD issued a separate, but related NOV to the Company regarding the Edgar Thomson facility. In the NOVs, based upon their inspections and review of documents collected throughout the last two years, the agencies

allege that the Company has violated the CAA by exceeding the allowable visible emission standards from certain operations during isolated events. In addition, the agencies allege that the Company has violated certain maintenance, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements. U. S. Steel met with U.S. EPA Region III and ACHD ~~on December 18, 2017.~~several times. ACHD, U.S. EPA Region III and U. S. Steel continue to negotiate a potential resolution of the matter.

On June 27, 2019, U. S. Steel ~~received~~and ACHD entered into a ~~civil enforcement order with an assessed penalty~~Settlement Agreement that is now in ~~the amount~~effect resolving four appeals of ~~$263,400 from~~four separate Enforcement Orders issued by the ACHD in 2018 and 2019. A comment period expired on ~~April 4, 2018.~~July 31, 2019 after a public hearing that was held on July 30, 2019. The allegations in the order are based on events that were alleged to have occurred in February and March of 2016. The allegations were the subject of Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) citations that were resolved through a settlement agreement after U. S. Steel contested the OSHA citations. Specifically, the ACHD allegesSettlement Agreement requires that U. S. Steel ~~failed~~pay a civil penalty and create a Community Benefit Trust totaling $2,732,504, with 90% of this value going into the trust; and 10% going into ACHD’s Clean Air Fund. In addition, U. S. Steel agreed to ~~properly abate asbestos-containing material~~complete several actions which are aimed at reducing emissions including: complete refractory repairs on Batteries 1, 2, 3 and 15; enhance training for certain coke plant employees; have third party audits conducted; complete projects on B Battery to reduce the potential for fugitive emissions, and complete upgrades on the Pushing Emission Control devices for Batteries 13-15; and 19-20. U. S Steel is working with ACHD in ~~conformance~~responding to comments.

On December 24, 2018, U. S. Steel's Clairton Plant experienced a fire, affecting portions of the facility involved in desulfurization of the coke oven gas generated during the coking process. With the desulfurization process out of operation as a result of the fire, U. S. Steel was not able to certify compliance with ~~applicable permits~~Clairton Plant’s Title V permit levels for sulfur emissions. U. S. Steel promptly notified ACHD, which has regulatory jurisdiction for the Title V permit, and ~~regulations. After meeting with~~updated the ACHD regularly on our efforts to mitigate any potential environmental impacts until the desulfurization process was returned to normal operations. Of the approximately 2,400 hours between the date of the fire and April 4, 2019, when the Company resumed desulfurization, there were ten intermittent hours where average SO₂ emissions exceeded the hourly NAAQS for SO₂ at the Allegheny County regional air quality monitors located in Liberty and North Braddock boroughs which are near U. S. Steel's Mon Valley Works facilities. ACHD has asserted that these emission levels were the result of our inability to complete the desulfurization process following the fire and informed U. S. Steel that it will pursue enforcement action against the Company following restoration of the desulfurization process to normal operations. On February 13, 2019, PennEnvironment and Clean Air Council, both environmental, non-governmental organizations, sent U. S. Steel a 60-day notice of intent to sue letter pursuant to the CAA. The letter alleges Title V permit violations at the Clairton, Irvin, and Edgar Thomson facilities as a result of the December 24, 2018 Clairton Plant fire. The 60-day notice letter also alleged that the violations caused adverse public health and welfare impacts to the communities surrounding the Clairton, Irvin, and Edgar Thomson facilities. PennEnvironment and Clean Air Council subsequently filed a Complaint in Federal Court in the Western District of Pennsylvania on April 29, 2019 to which U. S. Steel has responded. On May 3, 2019, ACHD filed a motion to intervene in the lawsuit which was granted by the Court. On June 25, 2019, ACHD filed its Complaint in Intervention, seeking injunctive relief and civil penalties regarding the alleged Permit violations following the December 24, 2018 fire. An initial Court status conference was held on August 22, 2019 and the parties are currently engaged in discovery.

Following up to its May 2, 2019, notice of intent to sue U. S. Steel, on ~~May 3, 2018,~~August 26, 2019 the ~~ACHD vacated~~Environmental Integrity Project, the ~~original order~~Breathe Project and ~~issued~~Clean Air Council, environmental, non-governmental organizations, filed a ~~new order reducing~~complaint in the ~~penalty to $198,600 for alleged violations~~Western District Court of Pennsylvania alleging that the Company did not report releases of reportable quantities of hydrogen sulfide, benzene, and coke oven emissions from the Clairton plant, the Edgar Thomson plant, and the Irvin plant as would be required under CERCLA because of the ~~asbestos Operating and Maintenance Permit.~~fire. The Company will vigorously defend against these claims.

On April 24, 2019, U. S. Steel ~~appealed~~was served with a class action complaint that was filed in the ~~new order~~Allegheny Court of Common Pleas related to the December 24, 2018 fire at Clairton. The complaint asserts common law nuisance and negligence claims and seeks compensatory and punitive damages that allegedly were the result of U. S. Steel's conduct that resulted in the fire and U. S. Steel's operations subsequent to the fire. An initial Court status conference was held on June 4, 2018. In addition, the ACHD issued three new civil enforcement orders on June 3, 2018, assessing a total penalty of $91,100 for the Company’s alleged failure to submit quarterly reports of asbestos removed under its Operating and Maintenance Permits at the Irvin Works, Edgar Thomson, and Clairton plants in 2015, 2016, 2017,27, 2019 and the first quarter of 2018. The Company appealed the June 3, 2018 orders on June 28, 2018. The cases were consolidated. After agreeing to perform some community supplemental environmental projects to offset part of the penalty, U. S. Steel withdrew the appeal of the consolidated cases on October 15, 2018.

On June 28, 2018, U. S. Steel received an Enforcement Order from the ACHD for the Clairton plant for alleged violations of various environmental permit and regulatory requirements pertaining to air emissions. The total penalty demand is $1,091,950 for alleged violations that were to have occurredparties are currently engaged in ~~late 2017 and early 2018. ACHD ordered U. S. Steel to conduct a SO~~₂ stack test of C Battery Quench Tower exhaust. ACHD also ordered U. S. Steel to provide an assessment of all emissions points at the Clairton facility to ACHD; and to propose measures, for ACHD approval, to reduce SO₂, particulate matter and visible emissions within sixty days of receipt of the Order. In the Order, ACHD demanded that if U. S. Steel fails to meet any requirements in the Order, U. S. Steel shall place its two worst performing batteries on hot idle until ACHD determinesdiscovery. U. S. Steel is ~~in compliance with~~vigorously defending the ~~Order. U. S. Steel has appealed the Order and posted the penalty amount in an escrow account; and is currently engaged in discovery regarding the~~ matter. ~~A hearing date has been scheduled for December 3, 2018.~~

On October 17, 2018, ACHD issued an administrative order and assessed a penalty of $620,300 for violations regarding fugitive emission sources (coke oven doors, lids, offtakes, charging, high opacity doors and soaking) at the Clairton plant that were alleged to have occurred during the second quarter of 2018. We are currently reviewing the Order and will take appropriate action once our review is complete.

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

As of September 30, ~~2018,~~2019, U. S. Steel was a defendant in approximately ~~750~~796 active cases involving approximately ~~2,300~~2,380 plaintiffs. The vast majority of these cases involve multiple defendants. ~~At December 31, 2017, U. S. Steel was a defendant in approximately 820 active cases involving approximately 3,315 plaintiffs. As of September 30, 2018, about~~About 1,540, or approximately 6765 percent, of these plaintiff claims are currently pending in jurisdictions which permit filings with massive numbers of plaintiffs. At December 31, 2018, U. S. Steel was a defendant in approximately 755 active cases involving approximately 2,320 plaintiffs. Based upon U. S. Steel’s experience in such cases, ~~we believe~~it believes that the actual number of plaintiffs who ultimately assert claims against U. S. Steel will likely be a small fraction of the total number of plaintiffs.

The following table shows activity with respect to asbestos litigation:


Period ended	Opening Number of Claims	Claims Dismissed, Settled and Resolved (a)	New Claims	Closing Number of Claims	Opening Number of Claims	Claims Dismissed, Settled and Resolved^(a)	New Claims	Closing Number of Claims
December 31, 2015	3,455	415	275	3,315
December 31, 2016	3,315	225	250	3,340	3,315	225	250	3,340
December 31, 2017	3,340	275	250	3,315	3,340	275	250	3,315
September 30, 2018	3,315	1,225	210	2,300
December 31, 2018					3,315	1,285	290	2,320
September 30, 2019					2,320	150	210	2,380

(a) The period ending ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2018 includes approximately 1,000 dismissed cases previously pending in the State of Texas.

Historically, asbestos-related claims against U. S. Steel fall into three groups: (1) claims made by persons who allegedly were exposed to asbestos on the premises of U. S. Steel facilities; (2) claims made by persons allegedly exposed to products manufactured by U. S. Steel; and (3) claims made under certain federal and maritime laws by employees of former operations of U. S. Steel.

Item 1A. ~~RISK FACTORS~~Risk Factors

~~Please refer to item 1A.~~Our Investments in New Technologies May Not Be Fully Successful

Execution of our ~~annual report~~strategy depends, in part, on ~~Form 10-K for~~ the ~~year ended December 31, 2017 and item 1A.~~success of a number of investments we have made in new technologies. All of our ~~quarterly report~~investments are expected to deliver an enhanced “best of both” business model that delivers cost and/or capability differentiation for our stakeholders. Our intent to eventually acquire 100% of Big River Steel, like our other investments in state-of-the-art sustainable steel technologies including, but not limited to, the endless casting and rolling line at Mon Valley Works and XG3 at our PRO-TEC joint venture, is a significant element of our strategy. If our investment in Big River Steel fails to provide the benefits we expect or our financial condition is constrained, we may choose not to exercise our option to acquire its remaining outstanding ownership interests. In addition, if Big River Steel does not achieve the expected financial performance, we still may be required to acquire the remaining ownership interests at a discounted purchase price. Additionally, like with any significant construction project, we may be subject to changing market conditions and demand for our completed projects, delays and cost overruns, work stoppages, labor shortages, engineering issues, weather interferences, changes required by governmental authorities, delays or the inability to acquire required permits or licenses, the ability to finance the projects or disruption of existing operations, any of which could have an adverse impact on ~~Form 10-Q for~~our operational and financial results. Furthermore, new product development or modification is costly, involves significant research, development, time and expense and may not necessarily result in the ~~quarter ended June 30, 2018 for a description~~successful commercialization of ~~the principal risk factors affecting~~any new products, or new technologies may not perform as intended or expected. Unsuccessful execution of these strategic projects or underperformance of any of these assets could adversely affect our ~~business.~~business, results of operations and financial condition.



Item 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

The information concerning mine safety violations and other regulatory matters required by Section 150 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K is included in Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-Q.



Item 5.	~~OTHER INFORMATION~~ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

~~None.~~

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and the Affiliated Purchasers

Share repurchase activity under the Company's stock repurchase program during the three months ended September 30, 2019 was as follows:



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs ^(a)
July 1 - 31, 2019	672,942	$	14.684	672,942	$	145,075,025
August 1 - 31, 2019	652,342	$	12.506	652,342	$	136,917,011
September 1 - 30, 2019	—	$	—	—	$	136,917,011
Quarter ended September 30, 2019	1,325,284	$	13.612	1,325,284	$	136,917,011

^(a)On November 1, 2018, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to repurchase up to $300 million of our outstanding common stock over a two-year period at the discretion of management, of which approximately $163 million had been utilized as of September 30, 2019. The Company’s stock repurchase program does not obligate it to acquire any specific number of shares. Under this program, the shares will be purchased from time to time at prevailing market prices, through open market or privately negotiated transactions, depending upon market conditions.



Item 6.	EXHIBITS




31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

95		Mine Safety Disclosure required under Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

101 ~~INS~~		The following financial information from United States Steel Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2019 formatted in Inline XBRL ~~Instance Document~~(Extensible Business Reporting Language) includes: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~101 SCH~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document~~

~~101 CAL~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document~~

~~101 DEF~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document~~

~~101 LAB~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document~~

~~101 PRE~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document~~

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned chief accounting officer thereunto duly authorized.



UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION

By		/s/ ~~Colleen M. Darragh~~Kimberly D. Fast

		~~Colleen M. Darragh~~Kimberly D. Fast
		~~Vice President &~~Acting Controller

November ~~2, 2018~~1, 2019

WEB SITE POSTING

This Form 10-Q will be posted on the U. S. Steel web site, www.ussteel.com, within a few days of its filing.

~~-60-~~-64-



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Statement of Operations (In millions)		As Revised		Previously Reported		Effect of Change Higher/(Lower)
Cost of Sales		$	2,828	$	2,829	$	(1	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		75		89		(14		)
Net periodic benefit cost (other than service cost)		15		—		15



(In millions)	September 30, 2018		September 30, 2017
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,344	$	1,694
Restricted cash in other current assets	4		—
Restricted cash in other noncurrent assets	37		42
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	1,385	$	1,736



		As of September 30, 2018						As of December 31, 2017
(In millions)	Useful Lives	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount
Customer relationships	22 Years	$	132	$	69	$	63	$	132	$	64	$	68
Patents	10-15 Years	22		6		16		22		5		17
Other	4-20 Years	14		8		6		15		8		7
Total amortizable intangible assets		$	168	$	83	$	85	$	169	$	77	$	92



		Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
(In millions)	Consolidated Statement of Operations Location	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018		Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
Sales swaps ^(a)	Net sales	$	—	$	5
Foreign exchange forwards ^(b)	Other financial costs	5		(7		)



Year	Redemption Price
2021	103.125	%
2022	101.563	%
2023 and thereafter	100.000	%



Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 (In millions)	Total			Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income			Common Stock		Treasury Stock			Paid-in Capital			Non- Controlling Interest
Balance at beginning of year	$	2,275		$	(250	)	$	(1,497	)	$	176	$	(182	)	$	4,027		$	1
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net earnings	228			228
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Pension and other benefit adjustments	146						146
Currency translation adjustment	149						149
Derivative financial instruments	6						6
Employee stock plans	26											90			(64		)
Dividends paid on common stock	(26		)												(26		)
Other	4			4
Balance at September 30, 2017	$	2,808		$	(18	)	$	(1,196	)	$	176	$	(92	)	$	3,937		$	1



(In millions) ^(a)	Pension and Other Benefit Items			Foreign Currency Items			Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives			Total
Balance at December 31, 2017	$	(1,309	)	$	463		$	1		$	(845	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	292			(58		)	1			235
Amounts reclassified from AOCI ^(b)	(149		)	—			(12		)	(161		)
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)	143			(58		)	(11		)	74
Balance at September 30, 2018	$	(1,166	)	$	405		$	(10	)	$	(771	)



		Amount reclassified from AOCI
		Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In millions)	Details about AOCI components	2018			2017			2018			2017
	Amortization of pension and other benefit items
	Prior service costs ^(a)	$	(7	)	$	(8	)	$	(22	)	$	(22	)
	Actuarial losses ^(a)	(39		)	(38		)	(117		)	(114		)
	Settlement, termination and curtailment losses ^(a)	(10		)	(1		)	(10		)	(5		)
	Total pensions and other benefits items	(56		)	(47		)	(149		)	(141		)
	Derivative reclassifications to Consolidated Statements of Operations	(11		)	—			(12		)	—
	Total before tax	(67		)	(47		)	(161		)	(141		)
	Tax benefit ^(b)	—			—			—			—
	Net of tax	$	(67	)	$	(47	)	$	(161	)	$	(141	)



	Employee Related			Exit
(in millions)	Costs			Costs			Total
Balance at December 31, 2017	$	4		$	34		$	38
Cash payments/utilization	(3		)	(15		)	(18		)
Balance at September 30, 2018	$	1		$	19		$	20



Remainder of 2018	2019	2020	2021	2022	Later Years	Total
$195	$581	$482	$309	$304	$1,147	$3,018



UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION
RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED EBITDA GUIDANCE ^(a)
		Quarter Ended			Year Ended
		December 31,			December 31,
(Dollars in millions)		2018			2018
Reconciliation to Projected Adjusted EBITDA Included in Guidance
	Projected net earnings attributable to United States Steel Corporation included in Guidance	$	349		$	872
	Estimated income tax expense	30			66
	Estimated net interest and other financial costs	75			327
	Estimated depreciation, depletion and amortization	136			520
	Gain on equity investee transactions	(20		)	(38		)
	Granite City Works restart costs	5			68
	Granite City works adjustment to temporary idling charges	—			(8		)
	Projected adjusted EBITDA included in Guidance	$	575		$	1,807