UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


			☒			QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022


			☐			TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-16811

United States Steel Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

25-1897152

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)

(IRS Employer Identification No.)

600 Grant Street,

Pittsburgh,

15219-2800

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

(412) 433-1121

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:


Title of each class	Trading Symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered
United States Steel Corporation Common Stock	X	New York Stock Exchange
United States Steel Corporation Common Stock	X	Chicago Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company”, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

☐

Emerging growth company

☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No x

Common stock outstanding at July ~~26, 2021~~25, 2022 – ~~270,128,597~~237,226,996 shares

INDEX


			Page
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements:
		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations (Unaudited)	1
		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited)	2
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet (Unaudited)	3
		Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	4
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	5
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2726
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	4038
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	4038
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	4139
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4543
	Item 2	Purchases of Equity Securities by Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers	4544
	Item 3	Defaults upon Senior Securities	4544
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure	4544
	Item 5.	Other Information	4544
	Item 6.	Exhibits	4645
SIGNATURE			4746
WEB SITE POSTING			4746

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains information that may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We intend the forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements in those sections. Generally, we have identified such forward-looking statements by using the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “project,” “target,” “forecast,” “aim,” “should,” “plan,” “goal,” “future,” “will,” "may" and similar expressions or by using future dates in connection with any discussion of, among other things, the construction or operation of new or existing facilities, the timing, size and form of share repurchase transactions, operating performance, trends, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future, statements relating to volume changes, share of sales and earnings per share changes, anticipated cost savings, potential capital and operational cash improvements, ~~anticipated disruptions to our operations and industry due to the COVID-19 pandemic,~~ changes in global supply and demand conditions and prices for our products, international trade duties and other aspects of international trade policy, ~~the integration of Big River Steel in~~statements regarding our ~~existing business, business~~future strategies, ~~related to the combined business~~products and innovations, statements regarding our greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals and statements expressing general views about future operating results. However, the absence of these words or similar expressions does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but instead represent only the Company’s beliefs regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside of the Company’s control. It is possible that the Company’s actual results and financial condition may differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated results and financial condition indicated in these forward-looking statements. Management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable as of the time made. However, caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements because such statements speak only as of the date when made. Our Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In addition, forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our Company's historical experience and our present expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in this report and in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2020~~2021 and those described from time to time in our future reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

References in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to (i) "U. S. Steel," "the Company," "we," "us," and "our" refer to United States Steel Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries unless otherwise indicated by the context, ~~and~~ (ii) “Big River Steel” ~~refer~~refers to Big River Steel Holdings LLC and its direct and indirect subsidiaries unless otherwise indicated by the context and (iii) ”Transtar” refers to Transtar LLC and its direct and indirect subsidiaries unless otherwise indicated by the context.

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)


		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,					Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	2021		2020		2021		2020		(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	2022		2021		2022		2021
Net sales:	Net sales:									Net sales:
Net sales	Net sales	$	4,684	$	2,000	$	8,053	$	4,397	Net sales	$	5,794	$	4,684	$	10,637	$	8,053
Net sales to related parties (Note 19)	Net sales to related parties (Note 19)	341		91		636		442		Net sales to related parties (Note 19)	496		341		887		636
Total (Note 6)	Total (Note 6)	5,025		2,091		8,689		4,839		Total (Note 6)	6,290		5,025		11,524		8,689
Operating expenses (income):	Operating expenses (income):									Operating expenses (income):
Cost of sales	Cost of sales	3,678		2,274		6,752		4,879		Cost of sales	4,661		3,678		8,484		6,752
Selling, general and administrative expenses	Selling, general and administrative expenses	106		62		208		134		Selling, general and administrative expenses	112		106		229		208
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	Depreciation, depletion and amortization	202		159		391		319		Depreciation, depletion and amortization	198		202		396		391
(Earnings) loss from investees		(35)		39		(49)		47
Earnings from investees										Earnings from investees	(95)		(35)		(131)		(49)

Asset impairment charges (Note 1)	Asset impairment charges (Note 1)	28		0		28		263		Asset impairment charges (Note 1)	151		28		157		28
Gain on equity investee transactions (Note 5)	Gain on equity investee transactions (Note 5)	0		0		(111)		(31)		Gain on equity investee transactions (Note 5)	—		—		—		(111)
Restructuring and other charges (Note 20)	Restructuring and other charges (Note 20)	31		89		37		130		Restructuring and other charges (Note 20)	17		31		34		37
Net gain on sale of assets	Net gain on sale of assets	(15)		0		(15)		0		Net gain on sale of assets	(2)		(15)		(4)		(15)
Other (gains) losses, net		(4)		0		(11)		5
Other gains, net										Other gains, net	(6)		(4)		(13)		(11)
Total	Total	3,991		2,623		7,230		5,746		Total	5,036		3,991		9,152		7,230
Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes		1,034		(532)		1,459		(907)
Earnings before interest and income taxes										Earnings before interest and income taxes	1,254		1,034		2,372		1,459
Interest expense	Interest expense	84		64		176		114		Interest expense	39		84		89		176
Interest income	Interest income	(1)		(1)		(2)		(5)		Interest income	(4)		(1)		(5)		(2)
Loss on debt extinguishment	Loss on debt extinguishment	1		0		256		0		Loss on debt extinguishment	2		1		2		256
Other financial costs	Other financial costs	4		7		22		4		Other financial costs	16		4		18		22
Net periodic benefit income	Net periodic benefit income	(29)		(8)		(60)		(16)		Net periodic benefit income	(61)		(29)		(122)		(60)
Net interest and other financial costs		59		62		392		97
Earnings (loss) before income taxes		975		(594)		1,067		(1,004)
Income tax benefit (Note 12)		(37)		(5)		(36)		(24)
Net earnings (loss)		1,012		(589)		1,103		(980)
Net interest and other financial (benefits) costs										Net interest and other financial (benefits) costs	(8)		59		(18)		392
Earnings before income taxes										Earnings before income taxes	1,262		975		2,390		1,067
Income tax expense (benefit) (Note 12)										Income tax expense (benefit) (Note 12)	284		(37)		530		(36)
Net earnings										Net earnings	978		1,012		1,860		1,103
Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests	Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests	0		0		0		0		Less: Net earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests	—		—		—		—
Net earnings (loss) attributable to United States Steel Corporation		$	1,012	$	(589)	$	1,103	$	(980)
Earnings (loss) per common share (Note 13):
Earnings (loss) per share attributable to United States Steel Corporation stockholders:
-Basic		$	3.75	$	(3.36)	$	4.25	$	(5.67)
-Diluted		$	3.53	$	(3.36)	$	4.02	$	(5.67)
Net earnings attributable to United States Steel Corporation										Net earnings attributable to United States Steel Corporation	$	978	$	1,012	$	1,860	$	1,103
Earnings per common share (Note 13):										Earnings per common share (Note 13):
Earnings per share attributable to United States Steel Corporation stockholders:										Earnings per share attributable to United States Steel Corporation stockholders:
'-Basic										'-Basic	$	3.80	$	3.75	$	7.17	$	4.25
'-Diluted										'-Diluted	$	3.42	$	3.53	$	6.45	$	4.02

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

-1-

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ~~(LOSS)~~

(Unaudited)


		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,					Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	(Dollars in millions)	2021		2020		2021		2020		(Dollars in millions)	2022		2021		2022		2021
Net earnings (loss)		$	1,012	$	(589)	$	1,103	$	(980)
Net earnings										Net earnings	$	978	$	1,012	$	1,860	$	1,103
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:	Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:									Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Changes in foreign currency translation adjustments	Changes in foreign currency translation adjustments	23		20		(24)		(3)		Changes in foreign currency translation adjustments	(100)		23		(128)		(24)
Changes in pension and other employee benefit accounts	Changes in pension and other employee benefit accounts	205		29		229		81		Changes in pension and other employee benefit accounts	1		205		(2)		229
Changes in derivative financial instruments	Changes in derivative financial instruments	(31)		15		(51)		10		Changes in derivative financial instruments	14		(31)		36		(51)
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax		197		64		154		88
Comprehensive income (loss) including noncontrolling interest		1,209		(525)		1,257		(892)
Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax										Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax	(85)		197		(94)		154
Comprehensive income including noncontrolling interest										Comprehensive income including noncontrolling interest	893		1,209		1,766		1,257
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest	Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest	0		0		0		0		Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest	—		—		—		—
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to United States Steel Corporation		$	1,209	$	(525)	$	1,257	$	(892)
Comprehensive income attributable to United States Steel Corporation										Comprehensive income attributable to United States Steel Corporation	$	893	$	1,209	$	1,766	$	1,257

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

-2-

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

(Unaudited)


(Dollars in millions)	(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2021		December 31, 2020		(Dollars in millions)	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
Assets	Assets					Assets
Current assets:	Current assets:					Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 7)	Cash and cash equivalents (Note 7)	$	1,329	$	1,985	Cash and cash equivalents (Note 7)	$	3,035	$	2,522
Receivables, less allowance of $43 and $34		1,903		914
Receivables, less allowance of $43 and $44						Receivables, less allowance of $43 and $44	2,428		1,968
Receivables from related parties (Note 19)	Receivables from related parties (Note 19)	107		80		Receivables from related parties (Note 19)	174		121
Inventories (Note 8)	Inventories (Note 8)	1,914		1,402		Inventories (Note 8)	3,014		2,210
Assets held for sale		154		0
Other current assets	Other current assets	231		51		Other current assets	384		331
Total current assets	Total current assets	5,638		4,432		Total current assets	9,035		7,152
Long-term restricted cash (Note 7)	Long-term restricted cash (Note 7)	95		130		Long-term restricted cash (Note 7)	64		76
Operating lease assets	Operating lease assets	192		214		Operating lease assets	163		185
Property, plant and equipment	Property, plant and equipment	19,757		17,704		Property, plant and equipment	19,841		19,676
Less accumulated depreciation and depletion	Less accumulated depreciation and depletion	12,382		12,260		Less accumulated depreciation and depletion	12,398		12,422
Total property, plant and equipment, net	Total property, plant and equipment, net	7,375		5,444		Total property, plant and equipment, net	7,443		7,254
Investments and long-term receivables, less allowance of $4 and $5		572		1,177
Investments and long-term receivables, less allowance of $4 in both periods						Investments and long-term receivables, less allowance of $4 in both periods	778		694
Intangibles, net (Note 9)	Intangibles, net (Note 9)	533		129		Intangibles, net (Note 9)	497		519
Deferred income tax benefits (Note 12)	Deferred income tax benefits (Note 12)	44		22		Deferred income tax benefits (Note 12)	2		32
Goodwill (Note 9)	Goodwill (Note 9)	909		4		Goodwill (Note 9)	920		920
Other noncurrent assets	Other noncurrent assets	726		507		Other noncurrent assets	956		984
Total assets	Total assets	$	16,084	$	12,059	Total assets	$	19,858	$	17,816
Liabilities	Liabilities					Liabilities
Current liabilities:	Current liabilities:					Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	$	2,675	$	1,779	Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	$	3,228	$	2,809
Accounts payable to related parties (Note 19)	Accounts payable to related parties (Note 19)	144		105		Accounts payable to related parties (Note 19)	157		99
Payroll and benefits payable	Payroll and benefits payable	425		308		Payroll and benefits payable	488		425
Accrued taxes	Accrued taxes	208		154		Accrued taxes	523		365
Accrued interest	Accrued interest	100		59		Accrued interest	65		68
Current operating lease liabilities	Current operating lease liabilities	56		59		Current operating lease liabilities	53		58
Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt (Note 15)	Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt (Note 15)	763		192		Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt (Note 15)	54		28
Liabilities held for sale		80		0
Total current liabilities	Total current liabilities	4,451		2,656		Total current liabilities	4,568		3,852
Noncurrent operating lease liabilities	Noncurrent operating lease liabilities	145		163		Noncurrent operating lease liabilities	119		136
Long-term debt, less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs (Note 15)	Long-term debt, less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs (Note 15)	4,803		4,695		Long-term debt, less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs (Note 15)	3,869		3,863
Employee benefits	Employee benefits	208		322		Employee benefits	206		235
Deferred income tax liabilities (Note 12)	Deferred income tax liabilities (Note 12)	46		11		Deferred income tax liabilities (Note 12)	299		122
Deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities	Deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities	488		333		Deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities	506		505
Total liabilities	Total liabilities	10,141		8,180		Total liabilities	9,567		8,713
Contingencies and commitments (Note 21)	Contingencies and commitments (Note 21)	0		0		Contingencies and commitments (Note 21)	0		0
Stockholders’ Equity (Note 17):	Stockholders’ Equity (Note 17):					Stockholders’ Equity (Note 17):
Common stock (279,242,676 and 229,105,589 shares issued) (Note 13)		279		229
Treasury stock, at cost (9,118,582 shares and 8,673,131 shares)		(183)		(175)
Common stock (282,420,032 and 279,522,227 shares issued) (Note 13)						Common stock (282,420,032 and 279,522,227 shares issued) (Note 13)	282		280
Treasury stock, at cost (39,042,398 shares and 15,708,839 shares)						Treasury stock, at cost (39,042,398 shares and 15,708,839 shares)	(877)		(334)
Additional paid-in capital	Additional paid-in capital	5,168		4,402		Additional paid-in capital	5,166		5,199
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)		480		(623)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (Note 18)		107		(47)
Retained earnings						Retained earnings	5,390		3,534
Accumulated other comprehensive income (Note 18)						Accumulated other comprehensive income (Note 18)	237		331
Total United States Steel Corporation stockholders’ equity	Total United States Steel Corporation stockholders’ equity	5,851		3,786		Total United States Steel Corporation stockholders’ equity	10,198		9,010
Noncontrolling interests	Noncontrolling interests	92		93		Noncontrolling interests	93		93
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	16,084	$	12,059	Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	19,858	$	17,816

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

-3-

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


		Six Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	(Dollars in millions)	2021		2020		(Dollars in millions)	2022		2021
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash					Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Operating activities:	Operating activities:					Operating activities:
Net earnings (loss)		$	1,103	$	(980)
Net earnings						Net earnings	$	1,860	$	1,103
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:	Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:					Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	Depreciation, depletion and amortization	391		319		Depreciation, depletion and amortization	396		391

Asset impairment charges (Note 1)	Asset impairment charges (Note 1)	28		263		Asset impairment charges (Note 1)	157		28
Gain on equity investee transactions	Gain on equity investee transactions	(111)		(31)		Gain on equity investee transactions	—		(111)
Restructuring and other charges (Note 20)	Restructuring and other charges (Note 20)	37		130		Restructuring and other charges (Note 20)	34		37
Loss on debt extinguishment	Loss on debt extinguishment	256		0		Loss on debt extinguishment	2		256
Pensions and other postretirement benefits	Pensions and other postretirement benefits	(46)		(10)		Pensions and other postretirement benefits	(106)		(46)
Deferred income taxes (Note 12)	Deferred income taxes (Note 12)	(77)		(12)		Deferred income taxes (Note 12)	247		(77)
Net gain on sale of assets	Net gain on sale of assets	(15)		0		Net gain on sale of assets	(4)		(15)
Equity investee (earnings) loss, net of distributions received		(49)		47
Equity investee earnings, net of distributions received						Equity investee earnings, net of distributions received	(110)		(49)
Changes in:	Changes in:					Changes in:
Current receivables	Current receivables	(875)		134		Current receivables	(615)		(875)
Inventories	Inventories	(343)		244		Inventories	(885)		(343)
Current accounts payable and accrued expenses	Current accounts payable and accrued expenses	789		(420)		Current accounts payable and accrued expenses	575		789
Income taxes receivable/payable	Income taxes receivable/payable	47		10		Income taxes receivable/payable	229		47
All other, net	All other, net	(32)		(56)		All other, net	(104)		(32)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		1,103		(362)
Net cash provided by operating activities						Net cash provided by operating activities	1,676		1,103
Investing activities:	Investing activities:					Investing activities:
Capital expenditures	Capital expenditures	(284)		(455)		Capital expenditures	(660)		(284)
Acquisition of Big River Steel, net of cash acquired (Note 5)	Acquisition of Big River Steel, net of cash acquired (Note 5)	(625)		0		Acquisition of Big River Steel, net of cash acquired (Note 5)	—		(625)
Investment in Big River Steel		0		(3)

Proceeds from cost reimbursement government grants (Note 21)						Proceeds from cost reimbursement government grants (Note 21)	53		—
Proceeds from sale of assets	Proceeds from sale of assets	25		1		Proceeds from sale of assets	12		25
Proceeds from sale of ownership interests in equity investees		0		8
Other investing activities	Other investing activities	(1)		(4)		Other investing activities	(7)		(1)
Net cash used in investing activities	Net cash used in investing activities	(885)		(453)		Net cash used in investing activities	(602)		(885)
Financing activities:	Financing activities:					Financing activities:
Repayment of short-term debt (Note 15)	Repayment of short-term debt (Note 15)	(180)		0		Repayment of short-term debt (Note 15)	—		(180)
Revolving credit facilities - borrowings, net of financing costs (Note 15)	Revolving credit facilities - borrowings, net of financing costs (Note 15)	50		1,462		Revolving credit facilities - borrowings, net of financing costs (Note 15)	—		50
Revolving credit facilities - repayments (Note 15)	Revolving credit facilities - repayments (Note 15)	(911)		(644)		Revolving credit facilities - repayments (Note 15)	—		(911)
Issuance of long-term debt, net of financing costs (Note 15)	Issuance of long-term debt, net of financing costs (Note 15)	825		1,048		Issuance of long-term debt, net of financing costs (Note 15)	4		825
Repayment of long-term debt (Note 15)	Repayment of long-term debt (Note 15)	(1,418)		(6)		Repayment of long-term debt (Note 15)	(73)		(1,418)
Proceeds from public offering of common stock (Note 22)		790		410
Proceeds from Stelco Option Agreement		0		40
Net proceeds from public offering of common stock (Note 22)						Net proceeds from public offering of common stock (Note 22)	—		790
Common stock repurchased (Note 22)						Common stock repurchased (Note 22)	(522)		—
Proceeds from government incentives (Note 21)						Proceeds from government incentives (Note 21)	82		—
Other financing activities	Other financing activities	(11)		(4)		Other financing activities	(39)		(11)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(855)		2,306
Net cash used in financing activities						Net cash used in financing activities	(548)		(855)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(9)		(1)		Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	(27)		(9)
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		(646)		1,490
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash						Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	499		(646)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year (Note 7)	Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year (Note 7)	2,118		939		Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year (Note 7)	2,600		2,118
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period (Note 7)	Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period (Note 7)	$	1,472	$	2,429	Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period (Note 7)	$	3,099	$	1,472


Non-cash investing and financing activities:	Non-cash investing and financing activities:					Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Change in accrued capital expenditures	Change in accrued capital expenditures	$	(26)	$	(98)	Change in accrued capital expenditures	$	104	$	(26)
U. S. Steel common stock issued for employee/non-employee director stock plans	U. S. Steel common stock issued for employee/non-employee director stock plans	27		18		U. S. Steel common stock issued for employee/non-employee director stock plans	46		27
Capital expenditures funded by finance lease borrowings	Capital expenditures funded by finance lease borrowings	10		30		Capital expenditures funded by finance lease borrowings	26		10
Export Credit Agreement (ECA) financing	Export Credit Agreement (ECA) financing	23		34		Export Credit Agreement (ECA) financing	—		23

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

-4-

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

The year-end Consolidated Balance Sheet data was derived from audited statements but does not include all disclosures required for complete financial statements by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). The other information in these condensed financial statements is unaudited but, in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods covered, including assessment of certain accounting matters using all available information ~~including~~such as consideration of forecasted financial information in context with other information reasonably available to us. However, our future assessment of our current expectations, including consideration of the unknown future impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, could result in material impacts to our consolidated financial statements in future reporting periods. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature unless disclosed otherwise. These condensed financial statements, including notes, have been prepared in accordance with the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not include all of the information and disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. Additional information is contained in the United States Steel Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, which should be read in conjunction with these condensed financial statements.

Asset ~~Impairment~~Impairments

In the second quarter 2022, the Company recognized charges of approximately $151 million for the write-off of the blast furnaces and related fixed assets for the permanent idling of the iron making process at the Company's Great Lakes Works facility, which had been idled on an indefinite basis during 2020. The coil finishing process at Great Lakes Works continues to operate and remains a component of the Company's operating plans.

In May 2019, U. S. Steel announced that it planned to construct a new endless casting and rolling facility at its Edgar Thomson Plant in Braddock, Pennsylvania, and a cogeneration facility at its Clairton Plant in Clairton, Pennsylvania, both part of the Company's Mon Valley Works. The Company purchased certain equipment for this project before delaying groundbreaking in March 2020 in response to COVID-19. In April 2021, the Company determined not to pursue this project, ~~and is re-evaluating uses for~~re-evaluated the use of the already purchased ~~equipment. An impairment~~equipment, and subsequently transferred suitable equipment to the Mini Mill segment to be used on the new three-million-ton mini mill flat-rolled facility under construction in Osceola, Arkansas (BR2). Total impairments of ~~$28~~$56 million ~~was~~were recognized for this project in 2021, $28 million of which was recognized during the three-month period ended June 30, 2021.

There were no triggering events that required an impairment evaluation of our long-lived asset groups as of June 30, ~~2021.~~2022.

2. New Accounting Standards

In ~~August 2020,~~October 2021, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2021-08, Accounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with Customers (ASU 2021-08). ASU 2021-08 requires that an entity recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in a business combination in accordance with Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2021-08 is effective for public companies with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption of all amendments in the same period permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of ASU 2021-08 but does not believe it will have a material impact on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3. Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In August 2020, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2020-06, Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity (ASU 2020-06). ASU 2020-06 simplifies the accounting for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity, including convertible instruments and contracts on an entity’s own equity. ASU 2020-06 also requires entities to provide expanded disclosures about the terms and features of convertible instruments and amends certain guidance in ASC 260 on the computation of ~~EPS~~earnings per share (EPS) for convertible instruments and contracts on an entity’s own equity. The update requires entities to use the If-Converted Method for calculating diluted earnings per share, retiring the previous alternative calculation of the Treasury Stock Method for calculating diluted earnings per share for convertible instruments.

U. S. Steel has adopted this guidance using the modified retrospective implementation method as of January 1, 2022. The cumulative effect of the changes made to our consolidated January 1, 2022, balance sheet for the adoption of ASU 2020-06 ~~is effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15,~~was as follows:

-5-


(in millions)	Balance as of December 31, 2021	Adjustments due to ASU 2020-06	Balance as of January 1, 2022
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
Assets
Deferred income tax benefits	32	4	36

Liabilities
Long-term debt, less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs	3,863	74	3,937
Deferred income tax liabilities	122	(15)	107

Equity
Additional paid-in capital	5,199	(78)	5,121
Retained Earnings	3,534	22	3,556

In November 2021, ~~and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption of all amendments in the same period permitted. The Company is continuing to assess the impact of adoption of the ASU.~~

3. ~~Recently Adopted Accounting Standards~~

~~In December 2019,~~ the FASB issued ~~ASU 2019-12,~~ ~~Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Simplifying the~~ Accounting ~~for Income Taxes~~Standards Update 2021-10, Disclosures by Business Entities about Government Assistance (ASU ~~2019-12)~~2021-10). ASU ~~2019-12 simplifies~~2021-10 provides expanded annual disclosure requirements for business entities that account for a transaction with a government by applying a grant or contribution accounting ~~for income taxes~~model by removing certain exceptions from the general principles in Topic 740 including elimination of the exception to the incremental approach for intraperiod tax allocation when there is a loss from continuing operations and income or a gain from other items such as other comprehensive income.analogy. U. S. Steel adopted this guidance oneffective January 1, ~~2021.~~2022. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4. Segment Information

U. S. Steel has 4 reportable segments: North American Flat-Rolled (Flat-Rolled), Mini Mill, U. S. Steel Europe (USSE); and Tubular Products (Tubular). The Mini Mill segment reflects the acquisition of Big River Steel after the purchase of the remaining equity interest on January 15, ~~2021. See~~2021 (see Note 5 for further ~~details. Prior to the purchase, the equity earnings of Big River Steel were included~~details) and BR2 which is under construction in ~~the Other segment.~~Osceola, Arkansas. The Tubular ~~Products~~ segment includes the ~~newly constructed EAF~~electric arc furnace at our Fairfield Tubular Operations in Fairfield, Alabama. The results of our ~~railroad,~~ real estate businesses and ~~the previously held equity method investment in Big River Steel~~of our former railroad business are combined and disclosed in the Other category.

The results of segment operations for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021 are:


(In millions) Three Months Ended June 30, 2022	Customer Sales		Intersegment Sales		Net Sales		Earnings from investees		Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes
Flat-Rolled	$	3,724	$	147	$	3,871	$	86	$	777
Mini Mill	838		147		985		—		270
USSE	1,342		4		1,346		—		280
Tubular	381		2		383		9		107
Total reportable segments	6,285		300		6,585		95		1,434
Other	5		—		5		—		(12)
Reconciling Items and Eliminations	—		(300)		(300)		—		(168)
Total	$	6,290	$	—	$	6,290	$	95	$	1,254

Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
Flat-Rolled	$	2,991	$	63	$	3,054	$	32	$	579
Mini Mill	759		142		901		—		284
USSE	1,078		1		1,079		—		207
Tubular	184		3		187		3		—
Total reportable segments	5,012		209		5,221		35		1,070
Other	13		27		40		—		14
Reconciling Items and Eliminations	—		(236)		(236)		—		(50)
Total	$	5,025	$	—	$	5,025	$	35	$	1,034

~~-5-~~

-6-

The results of segment operations for the ~~three months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 are:~~

(In millions) Three Months Ended June 30, 2021 Customer
Sales Intersegment
Sales Net
Sales Earnings (loss)
from
investees Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes
Flat-Rolled $ 2,991 $ 63 $ 3,054 $ 32 $ 579
Mini Mill 759 142 901 0 284
USSE 1,078 1 1,079 0 207
Tubular 184 3 187 3 0
Total reportable segments 5,012 209 5,221 35 1,070
Other 13 27 40 0 14
Reconciling Items and Eliminations — (236) (236) 0 (50)
Total $ 5,025 $ — $ 5,025 $ 35 $ 1,034
Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
Flat-Rolled $ 1,497 $ 42 $ 1,539 $ (16) $ (329)
USSE 403 1 404 0 (26)
Tubular 182 3 185 2 (47)
Total reportable segments 2,082 46 2,128 (14) (402)
Other 9 19 28 (25) (21)
Reconciling Items and Eliminations — (65) (65) 0 (109)
Total $ 2,091 $ — $ 2,091 $ (39) $ (532)

~~The results of segment operations for the~~ six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021 are:

(In millions) Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 Customer
Sales Intersegment
Sales Net
Sales Earnings (Loss)
from
investees Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes
Flat-Rolled $ 5,263 $ 106 $ 5,369 $ 37 $ 725
Mini Mill 1,209 204 1,413 0 416
USSE 1,876 2 1,878 0 312
Tubular 318 7 325 6 (29)
Total reportable segments 8,666 319 8,985 43 1,424
Other 23 56 79 6 22
Reconciling Items and Eliminations — (375) (375) 0 13
Total $ 8,689 $ — $ 8,689 $ 49 $ 1,459
Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Flat-Rolled $ 3,471 $ 104 $ 3,575 $ (12) $ (364)
USSE 908 2 910 0 (40)
Tubular 437 6 443 3 (95)
Total reportable segments 4,816 112 4,928 (9) (499)
Other 23 47 70 (38) (20)
Reconciling Items and Eliminations — (159) (159) 0 (388)
Total $ 4,839 $ — $ 4,839 $ (47) $ (907)

~~-6-~~


(In millions) Six Months Ended June 30, 2022	Customer Sales		Intersegment Sales		Net Sales		Earnings from investees		Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes
Flat-Rolled	$	6,678	$	199	$	6,877	$	116	$	1,290
Mini Mill	1,556		277		1,833		—		548
USSE	2,593		8		2,601		—		544
Tubular	690		5		695		15		184
Total reportable segments	11,517		489		12,006		131		2,566
Other	7		—		7		—		(5)
Reconciling Items and Eliminations	—		(489)		(489)		—		(189)
Total	$	11,524	$	—	$	11,524	$	131	$	2,372

Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
Flat-Rolled	$	5,263	$	106	$	5,369	$	37	$	725
Mini Mill	1,209		204		1,413		—		416
USSE	1,876		2		1,878		—		312
Tubular	318		7		325		6		(29)
Total reportable segments	8,666		319		8,985		43		1,424
Other	23		56		79		6		22
Reconciling Items and Eliminations	—		(375)		(375)		—		13
Total	$	8,689	$	—	$	8,689	$	49	$	1,459

A summary of total assets by segment is as follows:


(In millions)	(In millions)	June 30, 2021		December 31, 2020		(In millions)	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
Flat-Rolled	Flat-Rolled	$	7,468	$	7,099	Flat-Rolled	$	7,867	$	7,337
Mini Mill(a)	Mini Mill(a)	4,246		0		Mini Mill(a)	5,394		4,715
USSE	USSE	5,871		5,502		USSE	6,443		6,111
Tubular	Tubular	1,026		887		Tubular	1,070		1,054
Total reportable segments	Total reportable segments	$	18,611	$	13,488	Total reportable segments	$	20,774	$	19,217
Other	Other	$	313	$	911	Other	$	110	$	88
Corporate, reconciling items, and eliminations~~(a)~~(b)	Corporate, reconciling items, and eliminations~~(a)~~(b)	(2,840)		(2,340)		Corporate, reconciling items, and eliminations~~(a)~~(b)	(1,026)		(1,489)
Total assets	Total assets	$	16,084	$	12,059	Total assets	$	19,858	$	17,816

(a)Includes assets of $697 million and $347 million at June 30, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, related to BR2 under construction in Osceola, Arkansas.

(b)The majority of ~~Corporate,~~corporate, reconciling items, and eliminations ~~total assets~~ is comprised of cash and the elimination of intersegment amounts.

The following is a schedule of reconciling items to consolidated earnings before interest and income taxes:

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(In millions) 2021 2020 2021 2020
Items not allocated to segments:
Gain on previously held investment in Big River Steel $ 0 $ 0 $ 111 $ 0
Big River Steel - inventory step-up amortization 0 0 (24) 0
Big River Steel - unrealized losses (a)
(6) 0 (15) 0
Big River Steel - acquisition costs 0 0 (9) 0
Restructuring and other charges (Note 20) (31) (89) (37) (130)
Asset impairment charges (Note 1) (28) 0 (28) (263)
Property Sale 15 0 15 0
Gain on previously held investment in UPI 0 0 0 25
Tubular inventory impairment charge 0 (24) 0 (24)
December 24, 2018 Clairton coke making facility fire 0 4 0 4
Total reconciling items $ (50) $ (109) $ 13 $ (388)


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(In millions)	2022		2021		2022		2021
Items not allocated to segments:
Restructuring and other charges (Note 20)	$	(17)	$	(31)	$	(34)	$	(37)
Asset impairment charges (Note 1)	(151)		(28)		(157)		(28)
Other charges, net	—		(6)		2		(48)
Gains on assets sold and previously held investments	—		15		—		126
Total reconciling items	$	(168)	$	(50)	$	(189)	$	13

a) Big River Steel – unrealized losses represent the post-acquisition mark-to-market impacts of hedging instruments acquired with the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel on January 15, 2021. See Note 14 for further details.

-7-

5. Acquisitions and ~~Disposition~~

~~Transtar Disposition~~

On July 28, 2021, U. S. Steel sold 100 percent of the equity interests in its wholly-owned short-line railroad, Transtar, LLC (Transtar) to an affiliate of Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors, LLC for a cash purchase price of $640 million subject to certain customary adjustments as set forth in the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement. In connection with the closing of the transaction, the Company entered into certain ancillary agreements including a railway services agreement, providing for continued rail services for its Gary and Mon Valley Works facilities, and a transition services agreement. Because Transtar does not represent a significant component of U. S. Steel's business and does not constitute a reportable business segment, its results are reported in the Other category. See Note 4 for further details. The assets and liabilities that are included in the transaction are reported as assets held for sale and liabilities held for sale in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2021. Assets held for sale consist primarily of property, plant and equipment and receivables of $129 million and $10 million, respectively. Liabilities held for sale primarily consist of accounts payable and employee benefits of $33 million and $28 million, respectively.Dispositions

Big River Steel Acquisition

On January 15, 2021, U. S. Steel purchased the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel for approximately $625 million in cash net of $36 million and $62 million in cash and restricted cash received, respectively, and the assumption of liabilities of approximately $50 million. There were acquisition related costs of approximately $9 million ~~during the six months ended June 30,~~recorded in 2021.

Prior to the closing of the acquisition on January 15, 2021, U. S. Steel accounted for its 49.9% equity interest in Big River Steel under the equity ~~method as control and risk~~method. As a result of ~~loss were shared among~~ the ~~partnership members. Using step~~

~~-7-~~

acquisition, ~~accounting~~ the Company ~~increased~~adjusted the ~~value~~carrying amount of its previously held equity investment to its fair value of $770 million which resulted in a gain of approximately $111 million. The gain was recorded in gain on equity investee transactions in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

~~The acquisition has been accounted for in accordance with ASC 805,~~ ~~Business combinations~~. There were step-ups to fair value of approximately $308 million, $194 million and $24 million for property, plant and equipment, debt and inventory, respectively. An intangible asset for customer relationships and goodwill of approximately $413 million and $905 million were also recorded, respectively. Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair market value of the net assets. Goodwill is primarily attributable to Big River Steel's operational abilities, workforce and the anticipated benefits from their recent expansion and will be partially tax deductible. The inventory step-up was fully amortized as of March 31, 2021, the intangible asset will be amortized over a 22-year period and the debt step-up will be amortized over the contractual life of the underlying debt. See Note 15 for further details.

The value of Big River Steel was determined using Level 3 valuation techniques. Level 3 valuation techniques include inputs to the valuation methodology that are considered unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. A significant factor in determining the equity value was the discounted forecasted cash flows of Big River Steel. Forecasted cash flows are primarily impacted by the forecasted market price of steel and metallic inputs as well as the expected timing of significant capital expenditures. The model utilized a risk adjusted discount rate of 11.0% and a terminal growth rate of 2%.

~~The following table presents the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase price based on estimated fair values:~~


	~~(in millions)~~
~~Assets Acquired:~~
~~Receivables~~	$	~~166~~
~~Receivables with U. S. Steel~~ ~~(1)~~	99
~~Inventories~~	~~184~~
~~Other current assets~~	16
~~Property, plant and equipment~~	~~2,188~~
~~Intangibles~~	~~413~~
~~Goodwill~~	~~905~~
~~Other noncurrent assets~~	19
~~Total Assets Acquired~~	$	~~3,990~~


~~Liabilities Assumed:~~
~~Accounts payable and accrued liabilities~~	$	~~224~~
~~Payroll and benefits payable~~	27
~~Accrued taxes~~	9
~~Accrued interest~~	33
~~Short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt~~	29
~~Long-term debt~~	~~1,997~~
~~Deferred income tax liabilities~~	44
~~Deferred credits and other long-term liabilities~~	~~182~~
~~Total Liabilities Assumed~~	$	~~2,545~~

~~Fair value of previously held investment in Big River Steel~~	$	~~770~~
~~Purchase price, including assumed liabilities and net of cash acquired~~	~~675~~
~~Difference in assets acquired and liabilities assumed~~	$	~~1,445~~

~~(1)~~ The transaction to purchase Big River Steel included receivables for payments made by Big River Steel on behalf of U. S. Steel for retention bonuses of $22 million that impacted the previously held equity investment and for U. S. Steel liabilities assumed in the purchase of approximately $50 million. In addition, there were assumed receivables of approximately $27 million for steel substrate sales from Big River Steel to U. S. Steel. The receivables with U. S. Steel eliminate in consolidation with offsetting intercompany payables from U. S. Steel.

U. S. Steel is continuing to conform accounting policies and procedures and evaluate assets and liabilities assumed. During the one-year measurement period, we will continue to obtain information to assist in finalizing the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which may differ materially from these preliminary estimates. The final purchase price allocation may include changes in allocations to intangible assets, such as customer relationships, as well as

~~-8-~~

goodwill, changes to the fair value of long-term debt and other changes to assets and liabilities. We will apply any material adjustments in the reporting period in which the adjustments are determined.

The following unaudited pro forma information for U. S. Steel includes the results of the Big River Steel acquisition as if it had been consummated on January 1, 2020. The unaudited pro forma information is based on historical information and is adjusted for amortization of ~~the~~ intangible asset, property, plant and equipment and debt fair value step-ups discussed above. Non-recurring acquisition related items included in the 2020 period include $111 million for the gain on previously held equity investment, $9 million in acquisition related costs and $24 million in inventory step-up amortization related to the purchase of the remaining interest in Big River Steel. In addition, costs for non-recurring retention bonuses of $44 million that occurred in January 2021 prior to the purchase of the remaining equity interest are included in the 2020 period.step-ups. The pro forma information does not include any anticipated cost savings or other effects of the integration of Big River Steel. Accordingly, the unaudited pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the actual results that would have occurred, nor is it necessarily indicative of future results of operations. ~~Pro forma adjustments were not tax-effected in 2020 as~~


	Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions)	2021
Net sales	$	8,761
Net earnings (loss)	$	1,033

Transtar Disposition

On July 28, 2021, U. S. Steel ~~had~~completed the sale of 100 percent of its equity interests in its wholly-owned short-line railroad, Transtar, LLC (Transtar) to an affiliate of Fortress Transportation and Infrastructure Investors, LLC. The Company received net cash proceeds of $627 million, subject to certain customary adjustments as set forth in the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, and recognized a ~~full valuation allowance on~~pretax gain of approximately $506 million in 2021. In connection with the closing of the transaction, the Company entered into certain ancillary agreements including a railway services agreement, providing for continued rail services for its ~~domestic deferred tax assets.~~Gary and Mon Valley Works facilities, and a transition services agreement. Because Transtar does not represent a significant component of U. S. Steel's business and does not constitute a reportable business segment, its results through the date of disposition are reported in the Other category. See Note 4 for further details.

Six Months Ended June 30,
(in millions) 2021 2020
Net sales $ 8,761 $ 5,289
Net earnings (loss) $ 1,033 $ (967)
Other Transactions

~~USS-POSCO Industries (UPI) Acquisition~~

On February 29, 2020, U. S. Steel purchased the remaining equity interest in USS-POSCO Industries (UPI) that it did not already own, now known as USS-UPI, LLC, from its joint venture partner for $3 million, net of cash received of $2 million. There was an assumption of accounts payable owed to U. S. Steel for prior sales of steel substrate of $135 million associated with the purchase that is reflected as a reduction in receivables from related parties on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

~~Using step acquisition accounting~~In December 2021, the Company ~~increased the value~~entered into an agreement to sell certain assets related to a component of its ~~previously held equity investment~~flat-roll business. As a result of this commitment, the Company has recognized a total of $119 million in restructuring-related charges during the fourth quarter 2021 and six months ended June 30, 2022. These charges are expected to ~~its fair value of $5 million which resulted~~be paid out on a long-term basis. This transaction is expected to result in a gain ~~of approximately $25 million. The gain was recorded in gain on equity investee transactions in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.~~

Receivables of $44 million, inventories of $96 million, accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $19 million, current portion of long-term debt of $55 million and payroll and employee benefits liabilities of $78 million were recorded with the acquisition. Property, plant and equipment of $97 millionupon closure, which included a fair value step-up of $47 million and an intangible asset of $54 million were also recorded on the Company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. The intangible asset, which will be amortized over ten years, arises from a land lease contract, under which a certain portion of payment owedis subject to ~~UPI is realized in the form of deductions from electricity costs.~~customary closing conditions.

6. Revenue

Revenue is generated primarily from contracts to produce, ship and deliver steel products, and to a lesser extent, raw materials sales such as iron ore pellets and coke by-products and real estate sales. Generally, U. S. Steel’s performance obligations are satisfied and revenue is recognized when title transfers to our customer for product shipped or services are provided. Revenues are recorded net of any sales incentives. Shipping and other transportation costs charged to customers are treated as fulfillment activities and are recorded in both revenue and cost of sales at the time control is transferred to the customer. Costs related to obtaining sales contracts are incidental and are expensed when incurred. Because customers are invoiced at the time title transfers and U. S. Steel’s right to consideration is unconditional at that time, U. S. Steel does not maintain contract asset balances. Additionally, U. S. Steel does not maintain contract liability balances, as performance obligations are satisfied prior to customer payment for product. U. S. Steel offers industry standard payment terms.

The following tables disaggregate our revenue by product for each of the reportable business segments for the three months and six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively:

~~-9-~~-8-

Net Sales by Product (In millions):


Three Months Ended June 30, 2021		Flat-Rolled		Mini Mill		USSE		Tubular		Other		Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2022														Three Months Ended June 30, 2022	Flat-Rolled		Mini Mill		USSE		Tubular		Other		Total
Semi-finished	Semi-finished	$	0	$	0	$	46	$	0	$	0	$	46	Semi-finished	$	80	$	—	$	62	$	—	$	—	$	142
Hot-rolled sheets	Hot-rolled sheets	653		451		561		0		0		1,665		Hot-rolled sheets	710		507		636		—		—		1,853
Cold-rolled sheets	Cold-rolled sheets	889		127		102		0		0		1,118		Cold-rolled sheets	1,108		123		123		—		—		1,354
Coated sheets	Coated sheets	1,020		179		334		0		0		1,533		Coated sheets	1,364		206		456		—		—		2,026
Tubular products	Tubular products	0		0		14		178		0		192		Tubular products	—		—		21		379		—		400
All Other (a)	All Other (a)	429		2		21		6		13		471		All Other (a)	462		2		44		2		5		515
Total	Total	$	2,991	$	759	$	1,078	$	184	$	13	$	5,025	Total	$	3,724	$	838	$	1,342	$	381	$	5	$	6,290
(a) Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.	(a) Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.													(a) Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2020 Flat-Rolled USSE Tubular Other Total
Semi-finished $ 31 $ 1 $ 0 $ 0 $ 32
Hot-rolled sheets 239 146 0 0 385
Cold-rolled sheets 342 26 0 0 368
Coated sheets 713 202 0 0 915
Tubular products 0 11 178 0 189
All Other (a)
172 17 4 9 202
Total $ 1,497 $ 403 $ 182 $ 9 $ 2,091
(a) Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.


Six Months Ended June 30, 2021		Flat-Rolled		Mini Mill		USSE		Tubular		Other		Total
Three Months Ended June 30, 2021														Three Months Ended June 30, 2021	Flat-Rolled		Mini Mill		USSE		Tubular		Other		Total
Semi-finished	Semi-finished	$	12	$	0	$	49	$	0	$	0	$	61	Semi-finished	$	—	$	—	$	46	$	—	$	—	$	46
Hot-rolled sheets	Hot-rolled sheets	1,103		700		947		0		0		2,750		Hot-rolled sheets	653		451		561		—		—		1,665
Cold-rolled sheets	Cold-rolled sheets	1,673		206		185		0		0		2,064		Cold-rolled sheets	889		127		102		—		—		1,118
Coated sheets	Coated sheets	1,898		300		632		0		0		2,830		Coated sheets	1,020		179		334		—		—		1,533
Tubular products	Tubular products	0		0		24		306		0		330		Tubular products	—		—		14		178		—		192
All Other (a)	All Other (a)	577		3		39		12		23		654		All Other (a)	429		2		21		6		13		471
Total	Total	$	5,263	$	1,209	$	1,876	$	318	$	23	$	8,689	Total	$	2,991	$	759	$	1,078	$	184	$	13	$	5,025
(a) Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.	(a) Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.													(a) Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 Flat-Rolled USSE Tubular Other Total
Semi-finished $ 58 $ 2 $ 0 $ 0 $ 60
Hot-rolled sheets 741 351 0 0 1,092
Cold-rolled sheets 940 71 0 0 1,011
Coated sheets 1,424 431 0 0 1,855
Tubular products 0 20 429 0 449
All Other (a)
308 33 8 23 372
Total $ 3,471 $ 908 $ 437 $ 23 $ 4,839
(a) Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.


Six Months Ended June 30, 2022	Flat-Rolled		Mini Mill		USSE		Tubular		Other		Total
Semi-finished	$	129	$	—	$	63	$	—	$	—	$	192
Hot-rolled sheets	1,224		906		1,229		—		—		3,359
Cold-rolled sheets	2,079		215		262		—		—		2,556
Coated sheets	2,560		430		939		—		—		3,929
Tubular products	—		—		36		685		—		721
All Other (a)	686		5		64		5		7		767
Total	$	6,678	$	1,556	$	2,593	$	690	$	7	$	11,524
(a) Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.


Six Months Ended June 30, 2021	Flat-Rolled		Mini Mill (b)		USSE		Tubular		Other		Total
Semi-finished	$	12	$	—	$	49	$	—	$	—	$	61
Hot-rolled sheets	1,103		700		947		—		—		2,750
Cold-rolled sheets	1,673		206		185		—		—		2,064
Coated sheets	1,898		300		632		—		—		2,830
Tubular products	—		—		24		306		—		330
All Other (a)	577		3		39		12		23		654
Total	$	5,263	$	1,209	$	1,876	$	318	$	23	$	8,689
(a) Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.
(b) Mini Mill segment added after January 15, 2021 with the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel.

7. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported within U. S. Steel's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets that sum to the total of the same amounts shown in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows:

~~-10-~~-9-


(In millions)	(In millions)	June 30, 2021		June 30, 2020		(In millions)	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021		June 30, 2021
Cash and cash equivalents	Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,329	$	2,300	Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,035	$	2,522	$	1,329
Restricted cash in other current assets	Restricted cash in other current assets	47		1		Restricted cash in other current assets	—		2		47
Restricted cash in other noncurrent assets	Restricted cash in other noncurrent assets	95		128		Restricted cash in other noncurrent assets	64		76		95
Transtar cash in assets held for sale	Transtar cash in assets held for sale	$	1	$	0	Transtar cash in assets held for sale	—		—		1
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	1,472	$	2,429	Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	3,099	$	2,600	$	1,472

Amounts included in restricted cash represent cash balances which are legally or contractually restricted, primarily for electric arc furnace construction, environmental and other capital projects ~~collateral for open cash flow hedge positions~~ and insurance purposes.

8. Inventories

The LIFO method is the predominant method of inventory costing for our Flat-Rolled and Tubular segments. The FIFO and moving average methods are the predominant inventory costing methods for our Mini Mill segment and the FIFO method is the predominant inventory costing method for our USSE segment. At June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, the LIFO method accounted for 4637 percent and 5946 percent of total inventory values, respectively.


(In millions)	(In millions)	June 30, 2021		December 31, 2020		(In millions)	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
Raw materials	Raw materials	$	658	$	416	Raw materials	$	1,342	$	713
Semi-finished products	Semi-finished products	900		633		Semi-finished products	1,145		1,056
Finished products	Finished products	305		300		Finished products	480		388
Supplies and sundry items	Supplies and sundry items	51		53		Supplies and sundry items	47		53
Total	Total	$	1,914	$	1,402	Total	$	3,014	$	2,210

Current acquisition costs were estimated to exceed the above inventory values by ~~$667 million~~$1.561 billion and ~~$848~~$896 million at June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, respectively. AsCost of sales increased and earnings before interest and income taxes decreased by $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2022, and cost of sales decreased and earnings before interest and income taxes increased by $7 million for the six monthsended June 30, 2022, respectively, as a result of ~~the~~ liquidation of LIFO ~~inventories, cost~~inventories. Cost of sales decreased and earnings before interest and income taxes increased by $6 million and $7 million for the three ~~months~~ and six monthsended June 30, 2021, ~~respectively. Cost of sales increased and earnings before interest and income taxes decreased by $1 million and $6 million for the three months and six monthsended June 30, 2020,~~ respectively, as a result of liquidation of LIFO inventories.

9. Intangible Assets and Goodwill

Intangible assets that are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives are detailed below:


			As of June 30, 2021						As of December 31, 2020										As of June 30, 2022						As of December 31, 2021
(In millions)	(In millions)	Useful Lives	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Impairment		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount		(In millions)	Useful Lives	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Net Amount
Customer relationships	Customer relationships	22 Years	$	413	$	9	$	404	$	132	$	55	$	77	$	0	Customer relationships	22 Years	$	413	$	28	$	385	$	413	$	18	$	395
Patents	Patents	10-15 Years	17		10		7		22		7		10		5		Patents	5-15 Years	17		11		6		17		11		6
Energy Contract	Energy Contract	10 Years	54		7		47		54		0		5		49		Energy Contract	2 Years	54		23		31		54		11		43
Other		4-20 Years	0		0		0		14		5		9		0
Total amortizable intangible assets	Total amortizable intangible assets		$	484	$	26	$	458	$	222	$	67	$	101	$	54	Total amortizable intangible assets		$	484	$	62	$	422	$	484	$	40	$	444

Total estimated amortization expense for the remainder of ~~2021~~2022 is ~~$13~~$22 million. We expect approximately ~~$25~~$118 million in ~~annual~~total amortization expense from 2023 through ~~2026~~2027 and approximately ~~$320~~$282 million in remaining amortization expense thereafter.

The carrying amount of acquired water rights with indefinite lives as of June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020~~2021 totaled $75 million.

Below is a summary of goodwill by segment for the ~~six~~three months ended June 30, ~~2021:~~2022:

~~-11-~~-10-

Flat-Rolled Mini Mill USSE Tubular Total
Balance at December 31, 2020 $ 0 $ 0 $ 4 $ 0 $ 4
Additions 0 905 0 0 905
Balance at June 30, 2021 $ 0 $ 905 $ 4 $ 0 $ 909


	Flat-Rolled		Mini Mill		USSE		Tubular		Total
Balance at December 31, 2021	$	—	$	916	$	4	$	—	$	920
Additions	—		—		—		—		—
Balance at June 30, 2022	$	—	$	916	$	4	$	—	$	920

10. Pensions and Other Benefits

The following table reflects the components of net periodic benefit (income) cost ~~(income)~~ for the three months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020:~~2021:


		Pension Benefits				Other Benefits					Pension Benefits				Other Benefits
(In millions)	(In millions)	2021		2020		2021		2020		(In millions)	2022		2021		2022		2021
Service cost	Service cost	$	14	$	13	$	3	$	3	Service cost	$	11	$	14	$	2	$	3
Interest cost	Interest cost	41		48		12		16		Interest cost	39		41		12		12
Expected return on plan assets	Expected return on plan assets	(89)		(84)		(20)		(20)		Expected return on plan assets	(89)		(89)		(23)		(20)
Amortization of prior service credit	Amortization of prior service credit	1		1		(7)		(2)		Amortization of prior service credit	1		1		(6)		(7)
Amortization of actuarial net loss (gain)	Amortization of actuarial net loss (gain)	37		36		(6)		(4)		Amortization of actuarial net loss (gain)	18		37		(13)		(6)
Net periodic benefit cost (income), excluding below		4		14		(18)		(7)
Net periodic benefit (income) cost, excluding below										Net periodic benefit (income) cost, excluding below	(20)		4		(28)		(18)
Multiemployer plans	Multiemployer plans	18		18		0		0		Multiemployer plans	19		18		—		—
Settlement, termination and curtailment losses (a)	Settlement, termination and curtailment losses (a)	3		2		0		0		Settlement, termination and curtailment losses (a)	3		3		2		—
Net periodic benefit cost (income)	Net periodic benefit cost (income)	$	25	$	34	$	(18)	$	(7)	Net periodic benefit cost (income)	$	2	$	25	$	(26)	$	(18)
(a) During the three months ended June 30, 2021 the pension plan incurred curtailment charges of approximately $3 million with the sale of Transtar. For the three months ended June 30, 2020 the pension plan incurred special termination charges of $2 million due to workforce restructuring.
(a) During the three months ended June 30, 2022, pension and other postretirement benefits incurred special termination charges of approximately $5 million due to workforce restructuring. During the three months ended June 30, 2021, the pension plan incurred curtailment charges of approximately $3 million with the sale of Transtar.										(a) During the three months ended June 30, 2022, pension and other postretirement benefits incurred special termination charges of approximately $5 million due to workforce restructuring. During the three months ended June 30, 2021, the pension plan incurred curtailment charges of approximately $3 million with the sale of Transtar.

The following table reflects the components of net periodic benefit (income) cost ~~(income)~~ for the six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020:~~2021:


		Pension Benefits				Other Benefits					Pension Benefits				Other Benefits
(In millions)	(In millions)	2021		2020		2021		2020		(In millions)	2022		2021		2022		2021
Service cost	Service cost	$	28	$	25	$	6	$	6	Service cost	$	22	$	28	$	4	$	6
Interest cost	Interest cost	81		96		24		32		Interest cost	78		81		24		24
Expected return on plan assets	Expected return on plan assets	(178)		(165)		(40)		(40)		Expected return on plan assets	(178)		(178)		(45)		(40)
Amortization of prior service cost	Amortization of prior service cost	1		1		(14)		(4)		Amortization of prior service cost	1		1		(13)		(14)
Amortization of actuarial net loss (gain)	Amortization of actuarial net loss (gain)	75		72		(12)		(8)		Amortization of actuarial net loss (gain)	36		75		(26)		(12)
Net periodic benefit cost (income), excluding below		7		29		(36)		(14)
Net periodic benefit (income) cost, excluding below										Net periodic benefit (income) cost, excluding below	(41)		7		(56)		(36)
Multiemployer plans	Multiemployer plans	37		39		0		0		Multiemployer plans	38		37		—		—
Settlement, termination and curtailment losses (a)	Settlement, termination and curtailment losses (a)	3		8		0		0		Settlement, termination and curtailment losses (a)	4		3		2		—
Net periodic benefit cost (income)	Net periodic benefit cost (income)	$	47	$	76	$	(36)	$	(14)	Net periodic benefit cost (income)	$	1	$	47	$	(54)	$	(36)
(a) During the six months ended June 30, 2021 the pension plan incurred curtailment charges of approximately $3 million with the sale of Transtar. For the six months ended June 30, 2020 the pension plan incurred settlement and special termination charges of approximately $8 million due to workforce restructuring and lump sum payments made to certain individuals
(a) During the six months ended June 30, 2022, pension and other postretirement benefits incurred special termination charges of approximately $6 million due to workforce restructuring. During the six months ended June 30, 2021, the pension plan incurred curtailment charges of approximately $3 million with the sale of Transtar.										(a) During the six months ended June 30, 2022, pension and other postretirement benefits incurred special termination charges of approximately $6 million due to workforce restructuring. During the six months ended June 30, 2021, the pension plan incurred curtailment charges of approximately $3 million with the sale of Transtar.

Employer Contributions

During the first six months of ~~2021,~~2022, U. S. Steel made cash payments of ~~$37~~$38 million to the ~~Steelworkers’~~Steelworkers Pension Trust and $2$1 million of pension payments not funded by trusts.

During the first six months of ~~2021,~~2022, cash payments of ~~$18~~$11 million were made for other postretirement benefit payments not funded by trusts.

~~-12-~~

Company contributions to defined contribution plans totaled ~~$11~~$12 million and $4$11 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively. Company contributions to defined contribution plans totaled ~~$21~~$23 million and ~~$15~~$21 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020,~~ respectively.

Transtar Disposition

In connection with the Transtar sale, U. S. Steel remeasured its main pension benefit plan as of June 30, 2021. As a result of the remeasurement, the net pension obligation was reduced by $255 ~~million and the funded status level of plan increased to 103 percent.~~million.

-11-

11. Stock-Based Compensation Plans

U. S. Steel has outstanding stock-based compensation awards that were granted by the Compensation & Organization Committee of the Board of Directors, ~~(Committee),~~ or its designee, under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (2005 Plan) and the 2016 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended and restated (Omnibus Plan). The Company's stockholders approved the Omnibus Plan and authorized the Company to issue up to 32,700,000 shares of U. S. Steel common stock under the Omnibus Plan. While the awards that were previously granted under the 2005 Plan remain outstanding, all future awards will be granted under the Omnibus Plan. As of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, there were ~~16,428,281~~9,310,460 shares available for future grants under the Omnibus Plan.

Recent grants of stock-based compensation consist of restricted stock units, total stockholder return (TSR) performance awards and return on capital employed (ROCE) performance awards. Shares of common stock under the Omnibus Plan are issued from authorized, but unissued stock. The following table is a summary of the awards made under the Omnibus Plan during the first six months of ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020.~~2021.


		2021			2020				2022			2021
Grant Details	Grant Details	Shares(a)	Fair Value(b)		Shares(a)	Fair Value(b)		Grant Details	Shares(a)	Fair Value(b)		Shares(a)	Fair Value(b)

Restricted Stock Units	Restricted Stock Units	1,492,880	$	18.30	2,640,690	$	8.82	Restricted Stock Units	1,165,130	$	24.28	1,492,880	$	18.30
Performance Awards (c)	Performance Awards (c)							Performance Awards (c)
TSR	TSR	306,930	$	19.46	671,390	$	8.19	TSR	225,030	$	28.53	306,930	$	19.46
ROCE (d)	ROCE (d)	485,900	$	17.92	0	$	0	ROCE (d)	396,280	$	23.60	485,900	$	17.92

(a) The share amounts shown in this table do not reflect an adjustment for estimated forfeitures.

(b) Represents the per share weighted average for all grants during the period.

(d) ~~The ROCE awards granted in 2020 and a~~A portion of ROCE awards granted in 2022 and 2021are not shown in the table because they were granted in cash.

U. S. Steel recognized pretax stock-based compensation expense in the amount of ~~$15~~$16 million and $9$15 million in the three-month periods ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively and ~~$26~~$32 million and ~~$13~~$26 million in the first six months of ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021, respectively.

As of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, total future compensation expense related to nonvested stock-based compensation arrangements was ~~$48~~$72 million, and the weighted average period over which this expense is expected to be recognized is approximately 1721 months.

Stock Options

Compensation expense for stock options is recorded over the vesting period based on the fair value on the date of grant, as calculated by U. S. Steel using the Black-Scholes model and the assumptions listed below. Awards generally vest ratably over a three-year service period and have a term of ten years. Stock options are generally issued at the average market price of the underlying stock on the date of the grant. Upon exercise of stock options, shares of U. S. Steel stock are issued from treasury stock or from authorized, but unissued common stock. There have been no stock options granted since 2017 other than the 171,000 performance-based stock options granted in December 2021, which are further described below.

The expected annual dividends per share are based on the latest annualized dividend rate at the date of grant; the expected life in years is determined primarily from historical stock option exercise data; the expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of U. S. Steel stock; and the risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury strip rate for the expected life of the option.

The 171,000 performance-based stock options granted in December 2021 do not become vested and exercisable until the Company's 20-trading day average closing stock price meets or exceeds the following stock price hurdles during the seven-year period beginning on the grant date, as follows:


20-trading day Average Closing Stock Price Achievement During 7-Year Period Beginning on Grant Date(a)		Percentage of Performance-Based Stock Options Exercisable
$	35.00	33.33	%
$	45.00	33.33	%
$	55.00	33.34	%

(a) The $35.00 tranche vested in April 2022.

-12-

Stock Awards

Restricted stock units awarded as part of annual grants generally vest ratably over three years. Their fair value is the average market price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Restricted stock units granted in connection with new-hire or retention grants generally cliff vest three years from the date of the grant.

TSR performance awards may vest at varying levels at the end of a three-year performance period if U. S. Steel's total stockholder return compared to the total stockholder return of a peer group of companies meets specified performance criteria with each year in the three-year performance period weighted at 20 percent and the full three-year ~~performance~~period weighted at 40 percent. TSR performance awards can vest at between 0zero and 200 percent of the target award. The fair value of the TSR performance awards is calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation.

ROCE performance awards may vest at the end of a three-year performance period contingent upon meeting the specified ROCE performance metric. For the 2022 ROCE performance awards, each year in the three-year performance period is weighted at 20 percent and the full three-year period is weighted at 40 percent of the total award. ROCE performance awards can vest between 0zero and 200 percent of the target award. The fair value of the ROCE performance awards is the average market price of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.

~~-13-~~In December 2021, special performance-based restricted stock unit awards (PSUs) were granted to members of the Company’s executive leadership team. Shares are earned based on the achievement of certain pre-set quantitative performance criteria during the four-year performance period, January 1, 2022 through December 31, 2025. Shares may vest following the expiration of the Performance Period if the Company satisfies the performance criteria.

The Chief Executive Officer was granted PSUs that vest with the following, equally weighted, performance metrics: (i) EBITDA margin expansion, (ii) greenhouse gas emissions intensity reduction, (iii) asset portfolio optimization, (iv) leverage metrics and (v) corporate relative valuation. Other members of the executive leadership team were granted PSUs that vest with performance criteria related to: (i) on time and on budget completion of BR2 (30% of the grant), (ii) EBITDA margin expansion (40% of the grant) and (iii) greenhouse gas emissions intensity reduction (30% of the grant).

For the PSU awards, a payout is achievable at threshold (50% of target), target (100% of target) or maximum (200% of target) performance achievement. Payout amounts will be interpolated between the threshold, target and maximum amounts.

12. Income Taxes

Tax ~~benefit~~provision

For the six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022, and ~~2020,~~2021, the Company recorded a tax provision of $530 million and a tax benefit of $36 million, respectively. Additionally, in accordance with the adoption of ASU 2020-06, the Company recorded an increase in its long-term state deferred tax asset of $4 million and ~~$24~~a decrease in its long-term federal deferred tax liability of $15 million ~~respectively.~~in the first quarter of 2022. The tax provision and tax benefit for the first six months of 2022 and 2021, ~~was~~respectively, were based on an estimated annual effective rate, which requires management to make its best estimate of annual pretax income or loss and discrete items recognized during the period.

In March 2022, the Company and the Arkansas Economic Development Commission entered into the Recycling Tax Credit Incentive Agreement, whereby the Company may earn state income tax credits in an amount equal to 30% of the cost of waste reduction, reuse, or recycling equipment, subject to meeting the requirements of the Arkansas Code Ann. Section 26-51-506, for BR2 which is under construction in Osceola, Arkansas. Documentation supporting the Company's investment in qualifying equipment must be submitted as part of an application for certification expected to be completed on or before 2025. In March 2022, the Company received a lump-sum payment of approximately $82 million as proceeds from the sale of a portion of expected future tax credits to be earned by the Company (see Note 21 for additional information). The Company estimates that it could earn tax credits in excess of $700 million, exclusive of the amount sold in March 2022, which the Company will recognize in the year the assets are placed into service and meet the requirements of Arkansas Code Ann. Section 26-51-506. Any unused tax credit that cannot be claimed in a tax year may be carried forward indefinitely by the Company and applied to its future state tax liability.

The tax benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2021, includes a benefit of $262 million for the release of the domestic valuation allowance recorded against domestic deferred tax assets that are more likely than not to be realized. During the second quarter of 2021, the Company evaluated all available positive and negative evidence, including the impact of profitability generated from current year operations and future projections of profitability. As a result, the Company determined that all of its domestic deferred tax assets were more likely than not to be realized with the exception of certain of its state net operating losses and state tax credits and reversed the valuation allowance against those deferred tax assets accordingly.

~~The tax benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2020 includes a $14 million benefit related to recording a loss from continuing operations and income from other comprehensive income categories.~~

Throughout the year, management regularly updates forecasted annual pretax results for the various countries in which we operate based on changes in factors such as prices, shipments, product mix, plant operating performance and cost estimates. To the extent that actual ~~2021~~2022 pretax results for U.S. and foreign income or loss vary from estimates applied herein, the actual tax provision or benefit recognized in ~~2021~~2022 could be materially different from the forecasted amount used to estimate the tax ~~benefit~~provision for the six months ended June 30, ~~2021.~~2022.

-13-

13. Earnings and Dividends Per Common Share

Earnings ~~(Loss)~~ Per Share Attributable to United States Steel Corporation Stockholders

The effect of dilutive securities on weighted average common shares outstanding included in the calculation of diluted earnings ~~(loss)~~ per common share for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and June 30, ~~2020~~2021 were as follows.


		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,					Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	2021		2020		2021		2020		(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)	2022		2021		2022		2021
Earnings (loss) attributable to United States Steel Corporation stockholders		$	1,012	$	(589)	$	1,103	$	(980)
Earnings attributable to United States Steel Corporation stockholders:										Earnings attributable to United States Steel Corporation stockholders:
Basic										Basic	$	978	$	1,012	$	1,860	$	1,103
Interest expense on Senior Convertible Notes, net of tax										Interest expense on Senior Convertible Notes, net of tax	3		—		7		—
Diluted										Diluted	$	981	$	1,012	$	1,867	$	1,103
Weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands):	Weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands):									Weighted-average shares outstanding (in thousands):
Basic	Basic	269,872		175,327		259,668		172,775		Basic	257,267		269,872		259,348		259,668
Effect of Senior Convertible Notes	Effect of Senior Convertible Notes	11,975		0		10,439		0		Effect of Senior Convertible Notes	26,194		11,975		26,194		10,439
Effect of stock options, restricted stock units and performance awards	Effect of stock options, restricted stock units and performance awards	4,490		0		4,405		0		Effect of stock options, restricted stock units and performance awards	3,219		4,490		3,704		4,405
Adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding, diluted		286,337		175,327		274,512		172,775
Basic earnings (loss) per common share		$	3.75	$	(3.36)	$	4.25	$	(5.67)
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share		$	3.53	$	(3.36)	$	4.02	$	(5.67)
Diluted										Diluted	286,680		286,337		289,246		274,512
Earnings per share attributable to United States Steel Corporation stockholders:										Earnings per share attributable to United States Steel Corporation stockholders:
Basic										Basic	$	3.80	$	3.75	$	7.17	$	4.25
Diluted										Diluted	$	3.42	$	3.53	$	6.45	$	4.02

Excluded from the computation of diluted earnings ~~(loss)~~ per common share due to their anti-dilutive effect were 0.6 million outstanding securities granted under the Omnibus Plan for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2022 and 0.9 million and 1.3 million outstanding securities granted under the Omnibus Plan for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, ~~respectively and 5.9 million and 5.4 million outstanding securities granted under the Omnibus Plan for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020,~~ respectively.

Dividends Paid Per Share

The dividend for each of the first and second quarters of ~~2021~~2022 was 5 cents per common share. The dividend for each of the first and ~~2020~~second quarters of 2021 was 1 cent per common share.

14. Derivative Instruments

~~The USSE segment~~U. S. Steel uses foreign exchange forward sales contracts (foreign exchange forwards) with maturities up to ~~exchange euros for U.S. dollars (USD),~~28 months to manage our ~~Flat-Rolled segment used foreign exchange forwards~~currency requirements and exposure to exchange USD for Canadian dollars and our Mini Mill segment uses foreign exchange forwards to exchange USD for euros. All of our foreign exchange forwards have maturities no longer than 13 months and are used to mitigate the risk of foreign currency exchange rate ~~fluctuations and manage our foreign currency requirements.~~fluctuations. The USSE and Flat-Rolled segments use hedge accounting for their foreign exchange forwards. The Mini Mill segment has foreign exchange forwards for which hedge accounting has not ~~elected hedge accounting;~~been elected; therefore, the changes in the fair value of their foreign exchange forwards are recognized immediately in the ~~Condensed~~ Consolidated Statements of Operations (mark-to-market accounting).

~~-14-~~

~~The Flat-Rolled and USSE segments~~U. S. Steel also ~~use~~uses financial swaps to protect from the commodity price risk associated with purchases of natural gas, zinc, tin, electricity and ~~electricity~~iron ore pellets (commodity purchase swaps). We elected cash flow hedge accounting for ~~Flat-Rolled~~ commodity purchase swaps for natural gas, zinc and tin and iron ore pellets and use mark-to-market accounting for electricity ~~swaps used in our domestic operations and for commodity purchase swaps used in our European operations.~~swaps. The maximum derivative contract duration for commodity purchase swaps where hedge accounting was elected and was not elected is ~~six~~6 months and 3018 months, respectively.

~~The Flat-Rolled and Mini Mill segments have~~U. S. Steel has entered into financial swaps that are used to partially manage the sales price risk of certain hot-rolled coil sales (sales swaps) and iron ore pellet sales (zero cost collars). ~~The Flat-Rolled segment uses hedge accounting for its~~Both the sales swaps and the ~~Mini Mill segment uses mark-to-market~~zero cost collars are accounted for using hedge accounting ~~for its sales swaps. Sales swaps~~and have maturities of up to ~~six~~6 months.

-14-

The table below shows the outstanding swap quantities used to hedge forecasted purchases and sales as of June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and June 30, ~~2020:~~2021:


Hedge Contracts	Hedge Contracts	Classification	June 30, 2021		June 30, 2020		Hedge Contracts	Classification	June 30, 2022		June 30, 2021
Natural gas (in mmbtus)	Natural gas (in mmbtus)	Commodity purchase swaps	25,251,000		44,462,000		Natural gas (in mmbtus)	Commodity purchase swaps	51,735,000		25,251,000
Tin (in metric tons)	Tin (in metric tons)	Commodity purchase swaps	796		1,221		Tin (in metric tons)	Commodity purchase swaps	1,653		796
Zinc (in metric tons)	Zinc (in metric tons)	Commodity purchase swaps	12,851		12,564		Zinc (in metric tons)	Commodity purchase swaps	14,476		12,851
Electricity (in megawatt hours)	Electricity (in megawatt hours)	Commodity purchase swaps	986,400		936,000		Electricity (in megawatt hours)	Commodity purchase swaps	636,000		986,400
Iron ore pellets (in metric tons)							Iron ore pellets (in metric tons)	Commodity purchase swaps	10,000		—
Iron ore pellets (in metric tons)							Iron ore pellets (in metric tons)	Zero-cost collars	756,000		—
Hot-rolled coils (in tons)	Hot-rolled coils (in tons)	Sales swaps	159,880		0		Hot-rolled coils (in tons)	Sales swaps	77,000		159,880
Foreign currency (in millions of euros)	Foreign currency (in millions of euros)	Foreign exchange forwards	€	278	€	239	Foreign currency (in millions of euros)	Foreign exchange forwards	€	332	€	278
Foreign currency (in millions of dollars)	Foreign currency (in millions of dollars)	Foreign exchange forwards	$	9	$	0	Foreign currency (in millions of dollars)	Foreign exchange forwards	$	147	$	9
Foreign currency (in millions of CAD)	Foreign currency (in millions of CAD)	Foreign exchange forwards	$	0	$	15	Foreign currency (in millions of CAD)	Foreign exchange forwards	$	8	$	—

~~There were $34 million and $5 million~~The following summarizes the fair value amounts included in ~~accounts receivable and $151 million and $54 million in accounts payable recorded for derivatives designated as hedging instruments~~our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, ~~2021~~2022, and December 31, 2020, respectively. Amounts recorded in long-term asset and long-term liability accounts for derivatives were not material as of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020. Accounts payable recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance sheet for derivatives not designated as hedging instruments was $14 million as of June 30, 2021 and was immaterial as of December 31, 2020.2021:


Balance Sheet Location (in millions)	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Accounts receivable	$	76	$	42
Accounts payable	47		59
Investments and long-term receivables	2		2
Other long-term liabilities	13		4
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Accounts receivable	18		5
Investments and long-term receivables	6		5

-15-

The table below summarizes the effect of hedge accounting on ~~AOCI~~Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI) and amounts reclassified from AOCI into earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020:~~2021:


		Gain (Loss) on Derivatives in AOCI					Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income					Gain (Loss) on Derivatives in AOCI					Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
(In millions)	(In millions)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2021		Three Months Ended June 30, 2020		Location of Reclassification from AOCI (a)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2021		Three Months Ended June 30, 2020		(In millions)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2022		Three Months Ended June 30, 2021		Location of Reclassification from AOCI (a)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2022		Three Months Ended June 30, 2021
Sales swaps	Sales swaps	$	(79)	$	0	Net sales	$	(23)	$	0	Sales swaps	$	82	$	(79)	Net sales	$	(12)	$	(23)
Commodity purchase swaps	Commodity purchase swaps	22		19		Cost of sales (b)	5		(12)		Commodity purchase swaps	(74)		22		Cost of sales (b)	21		5
Foreign exchange forwards	Foreign exchange forwards	2		(4)		Cost of sales	(5)		0		Foreign exchange forwards	11		2		Cost of sales	12		(5)
(a) The earnings impact of our hedging instruments substantially offsets the earnings impact of the related hedged items resulting in immaterial ineffectiveness.											(a) The earnings impact of our hedging instruments substantially offsets the earnings impact of the related hedged items resulting in immaterial ineffectiveness.
(b) Costs for commodity purchase swaps are recognized in cost of sales as products are sold.											(b) Costs for commodity purchase swaps are recognized in cost of sales as products are sold.

~~(a)~~ ~~The earnings impact of our hedging instruments substantially offsets the earnings impact of the related hedged items resulting in immaterial ineffectiveness.~~

~~(b)~~ ~~Costs for commodity purchase swaps are recognized in cost of sales as products are sold.~~

~~-15-~~

Gain (Loss) on Derivatives in AOCI Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
(In millions) Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Location of Reclassification from AOCI (a)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Sales swaps $ (123) $ 0 Net sales $ (33) $ 0
Commodity purchase swaps 32 11
Cost of sales (b)
4 (20)
Foreign exchange forwards 21 1 Cost of sales (10) 0
~~(a)~~ ~~The earnings impact of our hedging instruments substantially offsets the earnings impact of the related hedged items resulting in immaterial ineffectiveness.~~

~~(b)~~ ~~Costs for commodity purchase swaps are recognized in cost of sales as products are sold.~~



	Gain (Loss) on Derivatives in AOCI					Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income
(In millions)	Six Months Ended June 30, 2022		Six Months Ended June 30, 2021		Location of Reclassification from AOCI (a)	Six Months Ended June 30, 2022		Six Months Ended June 30, 2021
Sales swaps	$	24	$	(123)	Net sales	$	(38)	$	(33)
Commodity purchase swaps	14		32		Cost of sales (b)	43		4
Foreign exchange forwards	9		21		Cost of sales	20		(10)
(a) The earnings impact of our hedging instruments substantially offsets the earnings impact of the related hedged items resulting in immaterial ineffectiveness.
(b) Costs for commodity purchase swaps are recognized in cost of sales as products are sold.

At current contract values, ~~$31~~$27 million currently in AOCI as of June 30, ~~2021~~2022 will be recognized as a decrease in cost of sales over the next year and ~~$149~~$2 million currently in AOCI as of June 30, ~~2021~~2022 will be recognized as ~~a decrease~~an increase in net sales over the next year.

The loss recognized for ~~sales~~foreign exchange forwards and financial swaps where hedge accounting was not elected was $3 million and $12 million for the three and sixmonths ended June 30, 2022, respectively. The loss recognized for foreign exchange forwards and financial swaps where hedge accounting was not elected was $6 million and $15 million ~~and was recognized in cost of sales~~ for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2021, respectively. The loss recognized for sales swaps where hedge accounting was not elected was not material for~~2021.

-16-

15. Debt


(In millions)	Issuer/Borrower	Interest Rates %	Maturity	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
2037 Senior Notes	U. S. Steel	6.650	2037	350		350
2029 Senior Secured Notes	Big River Steel	6.625	2029	720		720
2029 Senior Notes	U. S. Steel	6.875	2029	700		750
2026 Senior Convertible Notes	U. S. Steel	5.000	2026	350		350
Environmental Revenue Bonds	U. S. Steel	4.125 - 6.750	2024 - 2050	633		647
Environmental Revenue Bonds	Big River Steel	4.500 - 4.750	2049	752		752
Finance leases and all other obligations	U. S. Steel	Various	2022 - 2029	85		67
Finance leases and all other obligations	Big River Steel	Various	2022 - 2031	126		122
Export Credit Agreement	U. S. Steel	Variable	2031	136		136
Credit Facility Agreement	U. S. Steel	Variable	2027	—		—
Big River Steel ABL Facility	Big River Steel	Variable	2026	—		—
USSK Credit Agreement	U. S. Steel Kosice	Variable	2026	—		—
USSK Credit Facility	U. S. Steel Kosice	Variable	2024	—		—
Total Debt				3,852		3,894
Less unamortized discount, premium, and debt issuance costs				(71)		3
Less short-term debt, long-term debt due within one year, and short-term issuance costs				54		28
Long-term debt				$	3,869	$	3,863

2029 Senior Notes

During the ~~three and~~ six months ended June 30, ~~2020.~~

~~15.~~ ~~Debt~~

(In millions) Issuer/Borrower Interest
Rates % Maturity June 30, 2021 December 31, 2020
2037 Senior Notes U. S. Steel 6.650 2037 350 350
2029 Senior Secured Notes Big River Steel 6.625 2029 900 0
2029 Senior Notes U. S. Steel 6.875 2029 750 0
2026 Senior Notes U. S. Steel 6.250 2026 600 650
2026 Senior Convertible Notes U. S. Steel 5.000 2026 350 350
2025 Senior Notes U. S. Steel 6.875 2025 718 750
2025 Senior Secured Notes U. S. Steel 12.000 2025 0 1,056
Arkansas Teacher Retirement System Notes Payable Big River Steel 5.500 - 7.750 2023 106 0
Export-Import Credit Agreement U. S. Steel Variable 2021 0 180
Environmental Revenue Bonds U. S. Steel 4.125 - 6.750 2024 - 2050 717 717
Environmental Revenue Bonds Big River Steel 4.500 - 4.750 2049 752 0
Finance leases and all other obligations U. S. Steel Various 2021 - 2029 80 81
Finance leases and all other obligations Big River Steel Various 2021 - 2031 115 0
Export Credit Agreement (ECA) U. S. Steel Variable 2031 136 113
Credit Facility Agreement U. S. Steel Variable 2024 0 500
Big River Steel ABL Facility, $350 million Big River Steel Variable 2022 0 0
USSK Credit Agreement U. S. Steel Kosice Variable 2023 0 368
USSK Credit Facilities U. S. Steel Kosice Variable 2021 0 0
Total Debt 5,574 5,115
Less unamortized discount, premium, and debt issuance costs 8 228
Less short-term debt, long-term debt due within one year, and short-term issuance costs 763 192
Long-term debt $ 4,803 $ 4,695

~~Senior Secured Notes, Senior Notes and Export-Import Credit Agreement Repayments~~

~~The following debt repayments were made by U. S. Steel during the six-month period ended June 30, 2021:~~

~~-16-~~

•All of the remaining outstanding principal of approximately $180 million under the Export-Import Credit Agreement was repaid. There were approximately $3 million in non-cash debt extinguishment costs associated with the repayment. The Export-Import Credit Agreement and related security interests were terminated in conjunction with the payment in full. No early termination penalties applied with respect to the prepayment.

•The full optional redemption of the outstanding 12.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2025 for an aggregate principal amount of approximately $1.056 billion was completed. There were redemption premiums and unamortized discount and debt issuance write-offs of approximately $181 million and $71 million, respectively related to the repayment.

•~~Open~~2022, open market repurchases were made of approximately $50 million ~~and $32 million~~ of aggregate principal on the ~~6.250% Senior Notes due 2026 and its~~ 6.875% Senior Notes due ~~2025, respectively.~~2029. There were redemption premiums and debt issuance write-offs of $2 million related to the repurchases.

~~2025~~Industrial Development Board of the City of Hoover, AL Environmental Improvement Revenue Bonds - Series 2020

During the six months ended June 30, 2022, U. S. Steel completed an approximately $14 million partial redemption of the Hoover, AL environmental revenue bonds. No redemption premiums were incurred as a result of this partial redemption.

2026 Senior Convertible Notes

~~On June 17, 2021,~~In October 2019, U. S. Steel issued $350 million of 5.00% Senior Convertible Notes due November 1, 2026 (2026 Senior Convertible Notes). Interest on the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes is payable semi-annually on May 1 and November 1 of each year. The initial conversion rate for the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes is 74.8391 shares of U. S. Steel common stock per $1,000 principal amount, equivalent to an ~~irrevocable notice~~initial conversion price of ~~redemption~~approximately $13.36 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment pursuant to the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes indenture. Based on the initial conversion rate, the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes are convertible into 26,193,685 shares of U. S. Steel common stock and we reserved for the possible issuance of 33,396,930 shares, which is the maximum amount that could be issued upon conversion. Prior to August 1, 2026, holders of notes may convert all or a portion of their notes at their option only upon the satisfaction of specified conditions and during certain periods. On or after August 1, 2026, holders may convert all or a portion of their notes prior to the maturity date. Upon conversion, we will satisfy the obligation with cash, common stock, or a combination thereof, at our election. U. S. Steel may not redeem the ~~entirety~~2026 Senior Convertible Notes prior to November 5, 2023. On or after November 5, 2023, and prior to August 1, 2026, if the price per share of ~~its approximately $718 million aggregate principal amount~~U. S. Steel's common stock has been at least 130% of ~~outstanding 6.875%~~the conversion price for specified periods, U. S. Steel may redeem all or a portion of the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes ~~due 2025 (2025 Senior Notes). The Company expects the total payment to the holders including the redemption premium to be approximately $730 million (reflecting~~at a cash redemption price of ~~101.719%~~100% of the ~~aggregate~~ principal ~~amount),~~amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date of August 15, 2021. The 2025 Senior Notes will be redeemed with cash on hand. The 2025 Senior Notes are reflected in short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2021.interest.

~~2029 Senior Notes~~

~~On February 11, 2021,~~If U. S. Steel ~~issued $750 million aggregate principal amount of 6.875%~~undergoes a fundamental change, as defined in the 2026 Senior Convertible Notes, ~~due 2029 (2029~~holders may require us to repurchase the 2026 Senior Notes). U. S. Steel received net proceeds of approximately $739 million after fees of approximately $11 million related to underwriting and third-party expenses. The net proceeds from the issuance of the 2029 SeniorConvertible Notes together with the proceeds of our recent common stock issuance were used to redeem all of our outstanding 2025 Senior Secured Notes as discussed above. See Note 22 for further details regarding our recent common stock issuance. The 2029 Senior Notes will pay interest semi-annually in arrears on March 1 and September 1 of each year beginning on September 1, 2021, and will mature on March 1, 2029, unless earlier redeemed or repurchased.

On and after March 1, 2024, the Company may redeem the 2029 Senior Notes at its option, at any time in whole or from time to time in part, upon not less than 15 nor more than 60 days’ notice, at the redemption prices (expressed in percentages of principal amount) listed below, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the 2029 Senior Notes, if any, to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on March 1 of each of the years indicated below.

Year Redemption Price
2024 103.438 %
2025 101.719 %
2026 and thereafter 100.000 %

~~At any time prior to March 1, 2024, U. S. Steel may also redeem the 2029 Senior Notes, at our option,~~ in whole or in part ~~or from time to time,~~for cash at a price equal to ~~the greater of 100 percent~~100% of the principal amount of the ~~2029~~2026 Senior Convertible Notes to be ~~redeemed, or the sum of the present value of the redemption price of the 2029 Senior Notes if they were redeemed on March 1, 2024~~purchased plus ~~interest payments due through March 1, 2024 discounted to the date of redemption on a semi-annual basis at the applicable treasury yield, plus 50 basis points and~~any accrued and unpaid interest ~~if any.~~

~~At any time prior to March 1, 2024 we may also purchase up to 35% of the original aggregate principal amount of the 2029 Senior Notes at 106.875%, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any,~~ up to, but excluding the ~~applicable date of redemption, with proceeds from equity offerings.~~

Similar to our other senior notes, the indenture governing the 2029 Senior Notes restricts our ability to create certain liens, to enter into sale leaseback transactions and to consolidate, merge, transfer or sell all, or substantially all of our assets. It also contains provisions requiring that U. S. Steel make an offer to purchase the 2029 Senior Notes from holders upon a change of control under certain specified circumstances, as well as other customary provisions.

~~2029 Senior Secured Notes~~

On September 18, 2020, Big River Steel's indirect subsidiaries, Big River Steel LLC and BRS Finance Corp. (Issuers), issued $900 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.625% Senior Secured Notes (Green Bonds) (2029 Senior Secured Notes). The 2029 Senior Secured Notes pay interest semi-annually in arrears on January 31 and July 31 of each year and will mature on January 31, 2029, unless earlier redeemed or repurchased.

repurchase date.

-17-

On and after September 15, 2023, Big River Steel LLC may redeem the 2029 Senior Secured Notes at its option, at any time in whole or from time to time in part, at the redemption prices (expressed in percentages of principal amount) listed below, plus accrued and unpaid interest on the Notes, if any, to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date, if redeemed during the twelve-month period beginning on September 15 of each of the years indicated below.

Year Redemption Price
2023 103.313 %
2024 101.656 %
2025 and thereafter 100.000 %

The obligations under the 2029 Senior Secured Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a secured basis by the Issuers’ parent company, BRS Intermediate Holdings LLC (BRS Intermediate), which is a direct subsidiary of Big River Steel, and by all future direct and indirect wholly owned domestic subsidiaries of the Issuers. Additionally, the 2029 Senior Secured Notes and related guarantees are secured by (i) first priority liens on most of the tangible and intangible assets of the Issuers and the guarantors and all of the equity interests of the Issuers held by BRS Intermediate (shared in equal priority with each other pari passu lien secured party) (ii) and second priority liens on accounts receivable, inventory and certain other related assets of the Issuers and the guarantors (shared in equal priority with each other pari passu lien secured party).

If the Issuers or BRS Intermediate experience specified change in control events, the Issuers must make an offer to purchase the 2029 Senior Secured Notes. If the Issuers sell assets under specified circumstances, the Issuers must make an offer to purchase the 2029 Senior Secured Notes at a price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Indenture also limits the ability of the Issuers and their restricted subsidiaries to: incur or guarantee additional indebtedness; pay dividends and make other restricted payments; make investments; consummate certain asset sales; engage in transactions with affiliates; grant or assume liens; and consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of their assets. The Indenture also includes other customary events of default.

Big River Steel ~~Environmental Revenue Bonds~~ - ~~Series 2019~~Sustainability Linked ABL Facility

On May 31, 2019, Arkansas Development Finance Authority (ADFA) issued $487 million of tax-exempt bonds and loaned 100% of the proceeds to Big River Steel LLC under a bond financing agreement to finance the expansion of Big River Steel's electric arc furnace steel mill and fund the issuance cost of the bonds (2019 ADFA Bonds). The 2019 ADFA Bonds accrue interest at the rate of 4.50% per annum payable semiannually on March 1 and September 1 of each year with a final maturity of September 1, 2049.

~~The 2019 ADFA Bonds are subject to optional redemption during the periods and at the redemption prices shown below plus, in each case, accrued interest.~~


~~Year~~	~~Redemption Price~~
~~September 1, 2026 to August 31, 2027~~	~~103~~	%
~~September 1, 2027 to August 31, 2028~~	~~102~~	%
~~September 1, 2028 to August 31, 2029~~	~~101~~	%
~~On and after September 1, 2029~~	~~100~~	%

~~Prior to September 1, 2026, the 2019 ADFA Bonds are not redeemable.~~

The 2019 ADFA Bonds are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a senior secured basis by first priority liens on most of the tangible and intangible assets and second priority liens on accounts receivable, inventory and certain other related assets of BRS Intermediate and by all future direct and indirect wholly owned domestic subsidiaries of the Issuers.

The 2019 ADFA Bonds are subject to certain mandatory sinking fund redemption provisions beginning in 2040, as well as extraordinary mandatory redemption, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued interest to the date fixed for redemption, from surplus funds at the earlier of the completion of the tax-exempt project or expiration of a certain period for construction financings, and upon an event of taxability. The 2019 ADFA Bonds are subject to substantially similar asset sale offer and change of control offer provisions, affirmative and negative covenants, events of default and remedies as the Indenture governing the 2029 Senior Secured Notes.

~~Big River Steel Environmental Revenue Bonds - Series 2020~~

On September 10, 2020, ADFA issued $265 million of tax-exempt bonds with a green bond designation and loaned 100% of the proceeds to Big River Steel LLC under a bond financing agreement to finance or refinance the expansion of Big River Steel's electric arc furnace steel mill and fund the issuance cost of the bonds (2020 ADFA Bonds). The 2020 ADFA Bonds accrue interest at 4.75% per annum payable semi-annually on March 1 and September 1 of each year with final maturity on September 1, 2049.

~~-18-~~

~~The 2020 ADFA Bonds are subject to optional redemption during the periods and at the redemption prices shown below, plus, in each case accrued interest.~~


~~Year~~	~~Redemption Price~~
~~September 1, 2027 to August 31, 2028~~	~~103~~	%
~~September 1, 2028 to August 31, 2029~~	~~102~~	%
~~September 1, 2029 to August 31, 2030~~	~~101~~	%
~~On and after September 1, 2030~~	~~100~~	%

At any time prior to September 1, 2027, Big River Steel LLC may also redeem the 2020 ADFA Bonds, at its option, in whole or in part, or from time to time, at a price equal to the greater of 100 percent of the principal amount of the 2020 ADFA Bonds to be redeemed, or the present value of the redemption price of the 2020 ADFA Bonds if they were redeemed on September 1, 2027 plus interest payments due through September 1, 2027 discounted to the date of redemption on a semi-annual basis at the applicable tax exempt municipal bond rate and accrued and unpaid interest to the date fixed for redemption.

The 2020 ADFA Bonds are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally, on a secured basis by certain of Big River Steel's subsidiaries and subject to first priority liens and second priority liens on certain Big River Steel collateral.

The 2020 ADFA Bonds are subject to substantially similar asset sale offer and change of control offer provisions, affirmative and negative covenants, events of default and remedies as the Indenture governing the 2029 Senior Secured Notes.

~~Arkansas Teacher Retirement System Notes Payable~~

Big River Steel entered into 3 financing agreements with the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System during 2018 and 2019. The interest rates on the notes range from 5.50% to 7.75% at present. Interest on these agreements may be paid-in-kind through the respective dates of maturity and therefore requires no interim debt service by Big River Steel prior to the date of maturity or early repayment, as the case may be. Big River Steel may prepay amounts owed under these agreements at any time without penalty. One such agreement has the benefit of a pledge of future income streams generated through an anticipated monetization of recycling tax credits provided by the State of Arkansas in conjunction with the expansion of Big River Steel. As of June 30, 2021, the outstanding balance for these financing agreements was $106 million.

~~Big River Steel ABL Facility~~

~~On August 23, 2017, subsidiaries of Big River Steel entered into a~~amended senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility ~~and subsequently amended such facility~~ (Big River Steel ABL Facility) ~~by entering into the First Amendment to the Big River Steel ABL Credit Agreement, dated as of September 10, 2020.~~matures on July 23, 2026. The ~~Big River Steel ABL Facility~~facility is secured by first-priority liens on accounts receivable and inventory and certain other assets and second priority liens on most tangible and intangible assets of Big River Steel in each case subject to permitted liens. Additionally, the amendment includes sustainability targets related to greenhouse gas emissions intensity reduction, safety performance and facility certification by ResponsibleSteel™.

The Big River Steel ABL Facility provides for borrowings for working capital and general corporate purposes in an amount equal up to the lesser of (a) $350 million and (b) a borrowing base calculated based on specified percentages of eligible accounts receivables and inventory, subject to certain adjustments and reserves. The Big River Steel ABL Facility matures on August 23, 2022. The outstanding principal balance was 0 at June 30, 2021. Availability under the Big River Steel ABL Facility, pursuant to the available borrowing base was $350 million at June 30, 2021.

The Big River Steel ABL Facility provides for borrowings at interest rates based on defined, short-term market rates plus a spread based on availability. The Big River Steel ABL Facility also requires a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Big River Steel ABL Facility, determined quarterly based on Big River Steel LLC's utilization levels.

Big River Steel LLC must maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.00 to 1.00 for the most recent twelve consecutive months when availability under the Big River Steel ABL Facility is less than the greater of ten percent of the borrowing base availability and $13 million. Based on the most recent four quarters as of ~~March 31, 2021,~~June 30, 2022, Big River Steel would have met the fixed charge coverage ratio test. The ~~Big River Steel ABL Facility~~facility includes affirmative and negative covenants and events of default that are customary for facilities of this type. ~~The~~

There were no loans outstanding under the Big River Steel ABL Facility ~~also includes customary events of default.~~at June 30, 2022.

U. S. Steel - Sustainability Linked Credit Facility Agreement

On May 27, 2022, U. S. Steel entered into the Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Facility Agreement (Credit Facility Agreement) to replace the existing Fifth Amended and Restated Credit Facility Agreement (Fifth Credit Facility Agreement). The Credit Facility Agreement has substantially the same terms as the Fifth Credit Facility Agreement, except the Credit Facility Agreement references the Secured Overnight Financing Rate instead of the London Interbank Offered Rate, adjusts the individual lenders' commitments, and renews the five-year maturity to May 27, 2027. The Credit Facility Agreement also adjusts the threshold for the fixed charge coverage ratio. The total availability under the facility remained the same at $1,750 million, and the financial impact from replacing the Fifth Credit Facility Agreement was immaterial. Consistent with the Fifth Credit Facility Agreement, the Credit Facility Agreement is secured by first-priority liens on certain accounts receivable and inventory and includes targets related to greenhouse gas emissions intensity reduction, safety performance and facility certification by ResponsibleSteel™.

The Credit Facility Agreement provides for borrowings for working capital and general corporate purchases in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) $1,750 million or (b) a borrowing base calculated based on specified percentages of eligible accounts receivable and inventory, subject to certain adjustments and reserves. As of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, there were approximately $5$4 million of letters of credit issued and no loans drawn under the ~~Fifth Amended and Restated~~ Credit Facility ~~Agreement (Credit Facility Agreement).~~Agreement. U. S. Steel must maintain a fixed charge coverage ratio of at least 1.00 to 1.00 for the most recent four consecutive quarters when availability under the Credit Facility Agreement is less than the greater of ten percent of the ~~total aggregate commitments~~maximum facility availability and ~~$200~~$140 million. Based on the most recent four quarters as of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, the Company would have met the fixed charge coverage ratio test. In

~~-19-~~

addition, since the value of our inventory and trade accounts receivable less specified reserves calculated in accordance with the Credit Facility Agreement do not support the full amount of the facility at June 30, 2021, the amount available to the Company under this facility was further reduced by $77 million. The availability under the Credit Facility Agreement was $1.918 billion as of June 30, 2021.

U. S. Steel Košice (USSK) Credit Facilities

On September 29, 2021, USSK entered into a €300 million (approximately $312 million) unsecured sustainability linked credit agreement (USSK Credit Agreement). The USSK Credit Agreement matures in 2026 and contains sustainability targets related to greenhouse gas emissions intensity reduction, safety performance and facility certification by ResponsibleSteel™. At June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, USSK had no borrowings under the USSK Credit Agreement.

At June 30, 2022, USSK had no borrowings under its ~~€460~~€20 million ~~(approximately $547 million) revolving~~ credit facility (approximately $21 million) (USSK Credit ~~Agreement).~~

~~At June 30, 2021, USSK had 0 borrowings under its €20 million and €10 million credit facilities (collectively, approximately $36 million)~~Facility) and the availability was approximately ~~$32~~$7 million due to approximately $4$14 million of customs and other guarantees outstanding.

16. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, current accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable ~~bank checks outstanding,~~ and accrued interest included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet approximate fair value. See Note 14 for disclosure of U. S. Steel’s derivative instruments, which are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis.

~~Big River Steel~~

On October 31, 2019, a wholly owned subsidiary of U. S. Steel purchased a 49.9% ownership interest in Big River Steel. The transaction included a call option (U. S. Steel Call Option) to acquire the remaining equity interest within the next four years at an agreed-upon price formula. The investment purchase included other options that were marked to fair value during 2020. The net change in fair value of the options during the six months ended June 30, 2020 resulted in a $6 million decrease to other financial costs. When the U. S. Steel Call Option was exercised on December 8, 2020, the other options were legally extinguished and a new contingent forward asset was recorded for $11 million. As the contingent forward was a contract to purchase a business, it was no longer considered a derivative subject to ASC 815, ~~Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities~~, and was not subject to subsequent fair value adjustments. The contingent forward asset was removed with the recognition of the gain on the previously held investment in Big River Steel when the purchase of the remaining interest closed on January 15, 2021. See Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 2020 and Note 5 for further details.

Prior to exercise of the U. S. Steel Call Option, the options were marked to fair value each period using a Monte Carlo simulation which is considered a Level 3 valuation technique. Level 3 valuation techniques include inputs to the valuation methodology that are considered unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. The simulation relied on assumptions that included Big River Steel's equity value, volatility, the risk-free interest rate and U. S. Steel's credit spread.

Stelco Option for Minntac Mine Interest

On April 30, 2020 (Effective Date), the Company entered into an Option Agreement with Stelco, Inc. (Stelco), that grants Stelco the option to purchase a 25 percent interest (Option Interest) in a to-be-formed entity (Joint Venture) that will own the Company’s current iron ore mine located in Mt. Iron, Minnesota (Minntac Mine). As consideration for the Option, Stelco paid the Company an aggregate amount of $100 million in 5 $20 million installments ~~which began on~~during the ~~Effective Date and ended on~~year-ended December 31, 2020 ~~and~~which are recorded net of transaction costs in ~~noncontrolling interest in~~ the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. InThe option can be exercised any time before January 31, 2027, and in the event Stelco exercises the option, Stelco will contribute an additional $500 million to the Joint Venture, which amount shall be remitted solely to U. S. Steel in the form of a one-time special distribution, and the parties will engage in good faith negotiations to finalize the master agreement (pursuant to which Stelco will acquire the Option Interest) and the limited liability company agreement of the Joint Venture.

-18-

The following table summarizes U. S. Steel’s financial liabilities that were not carried at fair value at June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020.~~2021. The fair value of long-term debt was determined using Level 2 inputs.


		June 30, 2021				December 31, 2020					June 30, 2022				December 31, 2021
(In millions)	(In millions)	Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		(In millions)	Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount
Financial liabilities:	Financial liabilities:									Financial liabilities:
Short-term and long-term debt (a)		$	6,005	$	5,265	$	5,323	$	4,806
Long-term debt (a)										Long-term debt (a)	$	3,677	$	3,712	$	4,379	$	3,702

(a) Excludes finance lease obligations.

~~-20-~~

17. Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

The following table reflects the first six months of ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021 reconciliation of the carrying amount of total equity, equity attributable to U. S. Steel and equity attributable to noncontrolling interests:


Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 (In millions)		Total		(Accumulated Deficit) Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income		Common Stock		Treasury Stock		Paid-in Capital		Non- Controlling Interest
Six Months Ended June 30, 2022 (In millions)																Six Months Ended June 30, 2022 (In millions)	Total		Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Common Stock		Treasury Stock		Paid-in Capital		Non- Controlling Interest
Balance at beginning of year	Balance at beginning of year	$	3,879	$	(623)	$	(47)	$	229	$	(175)	$	4,402	$	93	Balance at beginning of year	$	9,103	$	3,534	$	331	$	280	$	(334)	$	5,199	$	93
Comprehensive income (loss):	Comprehensive income (loss):															Comprehensive income (loss):
Net earnings	Net earnings	91		91		—		—		—		—		—		Net earnings	882		882		—		—		—		—		—
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:	Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:															Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Pension and other benefit adjustments	Pension and other benefit adjustments	24		—		24		—		—		—		—		Pension and other benefit adjustments	(3)		—		(3)		—		—		—		—
Currency translation adjustment	Currency translation adjustment	(47)		—		(47)		—		—		—		—		Currency translation adjustment	(28)		—		(28)		—		—		—		—
Derivative financial instruments	Derivative financial instruments	(20)		—		(20)		—		—		—		—		Derivative financial instruments	22		—		22		—		—		—		—
Employee stock plans	Employee stock plans	6		—		—		2		(7)		11		—		Employee stock plans	7		—		—		2		(20)		25		—
Common Stock Issued		790		—		—		48		—		742		—
Common Stock Repurchased																Common Stock Repurchased	(123)		—		—		—		(123)		—		—
Dividends paid on common stock	Dividends paid on common stock	(3)		0		—		—		—		(3)		—		Dividends paid on common stock	(13)		(13)		—		—		—		—		—
Balance at March 31, 2021		$	4,720	$	(532)	$	(90)	$	279	$	(182)	$	5,152	$	93

Cumulative effect upon adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2020-06																Cumulative effect upon adoption of Accounting Standards Update 2020-06	(56)		22		—		—		—		(78)		—
Balance at March 31, 2022																Balance at March 31, 2022	$	9,791	$	4,425	$	322	$	282	$	(477)	$	5,146	$	93
Comprehensive income (loss):	Comprehensive income (loss):															Comprehensive income (loss):
Net earnings	Net earnings	1,012		1,012		—		—		—		—		—		Net earnings	978		978		—		—		—		—		—
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:	Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:															Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Pension and other benefit adjustments	Pension and other benefit adjustments	205		—		205		—		—		—		—		Pension and other benefit adjustments	1		—		1		—		—		—		—
Currency translation adjustment	Currency translation adjustment	23		—		23		—		—		—		—		Currency translation adjustment	(100)		—		(100)		—		—		—		—
Derivative financial instruments	Derivative financial instruments	(31)		—		(31)		—		—		—		—		Derivative financial instruments	14		—		14		—		—		—		—
Employee stock plans	Employee stock plans	17		—		—		0		(1)		18		—		Employee stock plans	19		—		—		—		(1)		20		—

Common Stock Repurchased																Common Stock Repurchased	(399)		—		—		—		(399)		—		—
Dividends paid on common stock	Dividends paid on common stock	(2)		0		—		—		—		(2)		—		Dividends paid on common stock	(13)		(13)		—		—		—		—		—

Other		(1)		—		—		—		—		—		(1)
Balance at June 30, 2021		$	5,943	$	480	$	107	$	279	$	(183)	$	5,168	$	92
Balance at June 30, 2022																Balance at June 30, 2022	$	10,291	$	5,390	$	237	$	282	$	(877)	$	5,166	$	93

~~-21-~~-19-


Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 (In millions)		Total		Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss		Common Stock		Treasury Stock		Paid-in Capital		Non- Controlling Interest
Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 (In millions)																Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 (In millions)	Total		(Accumulated Deficit) Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income		Common Stock		Treasury Stock		Paid-in Capital		Non- Controlling Interest
Balance at beginning of year	Balance at beginning of year	$	4,093	$	544	$	(478)	$	179	$	(173)	$	4,020	$	1	Balance at beginning of year	$	3,879	$	(623)	$	(47)	$	229	$	(175)	$	4,402	$	93
Comprehensive income (loss):	Comprehensive income (loss):															Comprehensive income (loss):
Net loss		(391)		(391)		—		—		—		—		—
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Pension and other benefit adjustments		52		—		52		—		—		—		—
Currency translation adjustment		(23)		—		(23)		—		—		—		—
Derivative financial instruments		(5)		—		(5)		—		—		—		—
Employee stock plans		2		—		—		0		(2)		4		—
Dividends paid on common stock		(2)		(2)		—		—		—		—		—
Balance at March 31, 2020		$	3,726	$	151	$	(454)	$	179	$	(175)	$	4,024	$	1
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net loss		(589)		(589)		—		—		—		—		—
Net earnings																Net earnings	91		91		—		—		—		—		—
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:	Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:															Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Pension and other benefit adjustments	Pension and other benefit adjustments	29		—		29		—		—		—		—		Pension and other benefit adjustments	24		—		24		—		—		—		—
Currency translation adjustment	Currency translation adjustment	20		—		20		—		—		—		—		Currency translation adjustment	(47)		—		(47)		—		—		—		—
Derivative financial instruments	Derivative financial instruments	15		—		15		—		—		—		—		Derivative financial instruments	(20)		—		(20)		—		—		—		—
Employee stock plans	Employee stock plans	8		—		—		0		0		8		—		Employee stock plans	6		—		—		2		(7)		11		—
Common Stock Issued	Common Stock Issued	410		—		—		50		—		360		—		Common Stock Issued	790		—		—		48		—		742		—
Dividends paid on common stock	Dividends paid on common stock	(1)		0		—		—		—		(1)		—		Dividends paid on common stock	(3)		—		—		—		—		(3)		—
Stelco Option Agreement		37		—		—		—		—		—		37
Balance at March 31, 2021																Balance at March 31, 2021	$	4,720	$	(532)	$	(90)	$	279	$	(182)	$	5,152	$	93
Comprehensive income (loss):																Comprehensive income (loss):
Net earnings																Net earnings	1,012		1,012		—		—		—		—		—
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:																Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Pension and other benefit adjustments																Pension and other benefit adjustments	205		—		205		—		—		—		—
Currency translation adjustment																Currency translation adjustment	23		—		23		—		—		—		—
Derivative financial instruments																Derivative financial instruments	(31)		—		(31)		—		—		—		—
Employee stock plans																Employee stock plans	17		—		—		—		(1)		18		—
Dividends paid on common stock																Dividends paid on common stock	(2)		—		—		—		—		(2)		—
Other	Other	(1)		—		—		—		—		—		(1)		Other	(1)		—		—		—		—		—		(1)
Balance at June 30, 2020		$	3,654	$	(438)	$	(390)	$	229	$	(175)	$	4,391	$	37
Balance at June 30, 2021																Balance at June 30, 2021	$	5,943	$	480	$	107	$	279	$	(183)	$	5,168	$	92

~~-22-~~-20-

18. Reclassifications from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI)


(In millions)	(In millions)	Pension and Other Benefit Items		Foreign Currency Items		Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Derivatives		Total		(In millions)	Pension and Other Benefit Items		Foreign Currency Items		Unrealized (Loss) Gain on Derivatives		Total
Balance at December 31, 2021										Balance at December 31, 2021	$	(25)	$	371	$	(15)	$	331
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications										Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications	(1)		(128)		65		(64)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI (a)										Amounts reclassified from AOCI (a)	(1)		—		(29)		(30)
Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income										Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income	(2)		(128)		36		(94)
Balance at June 30, 2022										Balance at June 30, 2022	$	(27)	$	243	$	21	$	237

Balance at December 31, 2020	Balance at December 31, 2020	$	(458)	$	449	$	(38)	$	(47)	Balance at December 31, 2020	$	(458)	$	449	$	(38)	$	(47)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	191		(24)		(79)		88		Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	191		(24)		(79)		88
Amounts reclassified from AOCI (a)	Amounts reclassified from AOCI (a)	38		0		28		66		Amounts reclassified from AOCI (a)	38		—		28		66
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)	Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)	229		(24)		(51)		154		Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)	229		(24)		(51)		154
Balance at June 30, 2021	Balance at June 30, 2021	$	(229)	$	425	$	(89)	$	107	Balance at June 30, 2021	$	(229)	$	425	$	(89)	$	107

Balance at December 31, 2019		$	(843)	$	381	$	(16)	$	(478)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		8		(3)		(8)		(3)
Amounts reclassified from AOCI (a)		73		0		18		91
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)		81		(3)		10		88
Balance at June 30, 2020		$	(762)	$	378	$	(6)	$	(390)

(a) See table below for further details.


		Amount reclassified from AOCI (a)									Amount reclassified from AOCI
		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,					Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
Details about AOCI components (in millions)	Details about AOCI components (in millions)	2021		2020		2021		2020		Details about AOCI components (in millions)	2022		2021		2022		2021
Amortization of pension and other benefit items(a)	Amortization of pension and other benefit items(a)									Amortization of pension and other benefit items(a)
Prior service credits ~~(a)~~	Prior service credits ~~(a)~~	$	(6)	$	(1)	$	(13)	$	(3)	Prior service credits ~~(a)~~	$	(5)	$	(6)	$	(12)	$	(13)
Actuarial losses ~~(a)~~	Actuarial losses ~~(a)~~	32		32		63		64		Actuarial losses ~~(a)~~	5		32		11		63
Settlement, termination and curtailment losses ~~(a)~~	Settlement, termination and curtailment losses ~~(a)~~	1		0		1		0		Settlement, termination and curtailment losses ~~(a)~~	—		1		—		1
UPI Purchase Accounting Adjustment		0		0		0		23
Total pensions and other benefits items	Total pensions and other benefits items	27		31		51		84		Total pensions and other benefits items	—		27		(1)		51
Derivative reclassifications to Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	Derivative reclassifications to Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	22		10		37		22		Derivative reclassifications to Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	(47)		22		(37)		37
Total before tax	Total before tax	49		41		88		106		Total before tax	(47)		49		(38)		88
Tax provision		(21)		(7)		(22)		(15)
Tax (benefit) provision										Tax (benefit) provision	11		(21)		8		(22)
Net of tax	Net of tax	$	28	$	34	$	66	$	91	Net of tax	$	(36)	$	28	$	(30)	$	66

(a) These AOCI components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. See Note 10 for additional details.

19. Transactions with Related Parties

Related party sales and service transactions are primarily related to equity investees and were ~~$341~~$496 million and ~~$91~~$341 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively and ~~$636~~$887 million and ~~$442~~$636 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively.

Accounts payable to related parties include balances due to PRO-TEC Coating Company, LLC (PRO-TEC) of ~~$143~~$156 million and ~~$86~~$98 million at June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, respectively for invoicing and receivables collection services provided by U. S. Steel on PRO-TEC's behalf. U. S. Steel, as PRO-TEC’s exclusive sales agent, is responsible for credit risk related to those receivables. U. S. Steel also provides PRO-TEC marketing, selling and customer service functions. Payables to other related parties totaled $1 million ~~and $19 million~~ for ~~the~~both periods ending June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, respectively.

Purchases from related parties for outside processing services provided by equity investees amounted to $6$7 million and ~~$10~~$6 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively and ~~$26~~$14 million and ~~$38~~$26 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively. Purchases of iron ore pellets from related parties amounted to ~~$30~~$44 million and ~~$16~~$30 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively and ~~$54~~$68 million and ~~$34~~$54 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively.

~~-23-~~

20. Restructuring and Other Charges

During the three months ended June 30, 2022, the Company recorded restructuring and other charges of $17 million, which consisted of $13 million related to the planned sale of a component within the Flat-Rolled segment and $4 million

-21-

of severance-related charges at other facilities. Cash payments were made related to severance and exit costs of approximately $5 million.

During the six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company recorded restructuring and other charges of $34 million, which consisted of $30 million related to the planned sale of a component within the Flat-Rolled segment and $4 million of severance-related charges at other facilities. Cash payments were made related to severance and exit costs of approximately $28 million.

During the three months ended June 30, 2021, the Company recorded restructuring and other charges of $31 million, which ~~consist~~consisted of $25 million for Great Lakes Works and $6 million for environmental and other charges. Cash payments were made related to severance and exit costs of approximately $15 million.

During the six months ended June 30, 2021, the Company recorded restructuring and other charges of $37 million, which ~~consists~~consisted of $27 million for Great Lakes Works and $10 million for environmental related charges at other facilities and costs related to severance. Cash payments were made related to severance and exit costs of approximately $44 million.

During the three months ended June 30, 2020, the Company recorded restructuring and other charges of $89 million, which consists of charges of $47 million for the indefinite idling of our Keetac mining operations and a significant portion of Great Lakes Works, $2 million for other charges, $8 million for employee benefit costs related to Company-wide headcount reductions and $32 million headcount reductions under a Voluntary Early Retirement Program (VERP) offered at USSK.

During the six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company recorded restructuring and other charges of $130 million, which consists of charges of $72 million for the indefinite idling of our Keetac mining operations and a significant portion of Great Lakes Works, $13 million for the indefinite idling of Lorain Tubular Operations and Lone Star Tubular Operations, $13 million and $32 million for employee benefit costs related to Company-wide headcount reductions and headcount reductions under a VERP offered at USSK, respectively. Cash payments were made related to severance and exit costs of approximately $33 million.

The activity in the accrued balances incurred in relation to restructuring ~~programs~~ during the six months ended June 30, ~~2021 were~~2022 was as follows:


(In millions)	(In millions)	Employee Related Costs		Exit Costs		Non-cash Charges		Total		(In millions)	Employee Related Costs		Exit Costs		Non-cash Charges		Total
Balance at December 31, 2020		$	51	$	126	$	0	$	177
Balance at December 31, 2021										Balance at December 31, 2021	$	91	$	149	$	—	$	240
Additional charges	Additional charges	3		33		1		37		Additional charges	35		(1)		—		34
Cash payments/utilization (a)	Cash payments/utilization (a)	(27)		(23)		(1)		(51)		Cash payments/utilization (a)	(14)		(22)		—		(36)
Balance at June 30, 2021		$	27	$	136	$	0	$	163
(a)Payments of $6 million were made from the pension fund trust.
Balance at June 30, 2022										Balance at June 30, 2022	$	112	$	126	$	—	$	238
(a)$8 million of payments were made from the pension fund trust assets in the Employee Related Costs column.										(a)$8 million of payments were made from the pension fund trust assets in the Employee Related Costs column.

Accrued liabilities for restructuring programs are included in the following balance sheet lines:


(In millions)	(In millions)	June 30, 2021		December 31, 2020		(In millions)	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
Accounts payable	Accounts payable	$	38	$	34	Accounts payable	$	108	$	34
Payroll and benefits payable	Payroll and benefits payable	11		29		Payroll and benefits payable	1		2
Employee benefits	Employee benefits	16		22		Employee benefits	110		88
Deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities	Deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities	98		92		Deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities	19		116
Total	Total	$	163	$	177	Total	$	238	$	240

21. Contingencies and Commitments

U. S. Steel is the subject of, or party to, a number of pending or threatened legal actions, contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters, including laws and regulations relating to the environment. Certain of these matters are discussed below. The ultimate resolution of these contingencies could, individually or in the aggregate, be material to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. However, management believes that U. S. Steel will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably.

U. S. Steel accrues for estimated costs related to existing lawsuits, claims and proceedings when it is probable that it will incur these costs in the future and the costs are reasonably estimable.

Asbestos matters – As of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, U. S. Steel was a defendant in approximately ~~935~~925 active asbestos cases involving approximately ~~2,525~~2,515 plaintiffs. The vast majority of these cases involve multiple defendants. About 1,545, or approximately 61 percent, of these plaintiff claims are currently pending in a jurisdiction which permits filings with massive numbers of plaintiffs. At December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, U. S. Steel was a defendant in approximately ~~855~~915 active asbestos cases involving approximately ~~2,445~~2,505 plaintiffs. Based upon U. S. Steel’s experience in such cases, it believes that the actual number of plaintiffs who ultimately assert claims against U. S. Steel will likely be a small fraction of the total number of plaintiffs.

~~-24-~~-22-

The following table shows the number of asbestos claims in the current period and the prior three years:

Period ended Opening
Number
of Claims
Claims
Dismissed,
Settled and
Resolved (a)
New Claims Closing
Number
of Claims
December 31, 2018 3,315 1,285 290 2,320
December 31, 2019 2,320 195 265 2,390
December 31, 2020 2,390 240 295 2,445
June 30, 2021 2,445 75 155 2,525

~~(a) The period ending December 31, 2018 includes approximately 1,000 dismissed cases previously pending in the State of Texas.~~


Period ended	Opening Number of Claims	Claims Dismissed, Settled and Resolved	New Claims	Closing Number of Claims
December 31, 2019	2,320	195	265	2,390
December 31, 2020	2,390	240	295	2,445
December 31, 2021	2,445	200	260	2,505
June 30, 2022	2,505	110	120	2,515

The amount U. S. Steel accrues for pending asbestos claims is not material to U. S. Steel’s financial condition. However, U. S. Steel is unable to estimate the ultimate outcome of asbestos-related claims due to a number of uncertainties, including: (1) the rates at which new claims are filed, (2) the number of and effect of bankruptcies of other companies traditionally defending asbestos claims, (3) uncertainties associated with the variations in the litigation process from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, (4) uncertainties regarding the facts, circumstances and disease process with each claim and (5) any new legislation enacted to address asbestos-related claims.

Further, U. S. Steel does not believe that an accrual for unasserted claims is required. At any given reporting date, it is probable that there are unasserted claims that will be filed against the Company in the future. ~~In 2020 and 2019, the~~The Company ~~engaged~~engages an outside valuation consultant to assist in assessing its ability to estimate an accrual for unasserted claims. This assessment ~~was~~is based on the Company's settlement experience, including recent claims trends. The analysis ~~focused~~focuses on settlements made over the last several years as these claims are likely to best represent future claim characteristics. After review by the valuation consultant and U. S. Steel management, it was determined that the Company could not estimate an accrual for unasserted claims.

Despite these uncertainties, management believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on U. S. Steel’s financial condition.

Environmental matters – U. S. Steel is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment. These laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites. Penalties may be imposed for noncompliance. Changes in accrued liabilities for remediation activities where U. S. Steel is identified as a named party are summarized in the following table:


(In millions)	Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022
Beginning of period	$	~~146~~158
Accruals for environmental remediation deemed probable and reasonably estimable	23
Obligations settled	~~(10)~~(24)
End of period	$	~~138~~137

Accrued liabilities for remediation activities are included in the following Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet lines:


(In millions)	(In millions)	June 30, 2021		December 31, 2020		(In millions)	June 30, 2022		December 31, 2021
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	$	42	$	43	Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	$	64	$	65
Deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities	Deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities	96		103		Deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities	73		93
Total	Total	$	138	$	146	Total	$	137	$	158

Expenses related to remediation are recorded in cost of sales and were immaterial for both the six-month periods ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and June 30, ~~2020.~~2021. It is not currently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed. Due to uncertainties inherent in remediation projects and the associated liabilities, it is reasonably possible that total remediation costs for active matters may exceed the accrued liabilities by as much as 4015 to 6030 percent.

Remediation Projects

U. S. Steel is involved in environmental remediation projects at or adjacent to several current and former U. S. Steel facilities and other locations that are in various stages of completion ranging from initial characterization through post-closure monitoring. Based on the anticipated scope and degree of uncertainty of projects, the Company categorizes projects as follows:

~~-25-~~-23-

(1)Projects with Ongoing Study and Scope Development - ~~Projects which are still in the development phase.~~ For these projects, the extent of remediation that may be required is not yet known, the remediation methods and plans are not yet developed, and/or cost estimates cannot be determined. Therefore, significant costs, in addition to the accrued liabilities for these projects, are reasonably possible. There are 54 environmental remediation projects where additional costs for completion are not currently estimable but could be material. These projects are at Fairfield Works, Lorain Tubular, ~~USS-POSCO Industries~~USS-UPI LLC (UPI)~~, Duluth Works~~ and the former steelmaking plant at Joliet, Illinois. As of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, accrued liabilities for these projects totaled ~~$34~~$1 million for the costs of studies, investigations, interim measures, design and/or remediation. It is reasonably possible that additional liabilities associated with future requirements regarding studies, investigations, design and remediation for these projects could be as much as ~~$50~~$22 million to ~~$75~~$36 million.

(2)~~Significant~~ Projects with Significant Accrued liabilities with a Defined Scope - ~~Projects with significant accrued liabilities with a defined scope.~~ As of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, there are 23 significant projects with defined scope greater than or equal to $5 million each, with a total accrued liability of ~~$43~~$83 million. These projects are Gary Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ~~(RCRA)~~(the RCRA) (accrued liability of $24 million), Duluth Works (accrued liability of $40 million) and the former Geneva facility (accrued liability of $19 million).

(3)Other Projects with a Defined Scope - ~~Projects with~~These projects involve relatively small accrued liabilities for which we believe that, while additional costs are possible, they are not likely to be significant, and also include those projects for which we do not yet possess sufficient information to estimate potential costs to U. S. Steel. There are 3 other environmental remediation projects which each had an accrued liability of between $1 million and $5 million. The total accrued liability for these projects at June 30, ~~2021~~2022 was $7$5 million. These projects have progressed through a significant portion of the design phase and material additional costs are not expected.

The remaining environmental remediation projects each have an accrued liability of less than $1 million each. The total accrued liability for these projects at June 30, ~~2021~~2022 was approximately $6$4 million. The Company does not foresee material additional liabilities for any of these sites.

Post-Closure Costs – Accrued liabilities for post-closure site monitoring and other costs at various closed landfills totaled ~~$23~~$24 million at June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and were based on known scopes of work.

Administrative and Legal Costs – As of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, U. S. Steel had an accrued liability of ~~$13~~$10 million for administrative and legal costs related to environmental remediation projects. These accrued liabilities were based on projected administrative and legal costs for the next three years and do not change significantly from year to year.

Capital Expenditures – For a number of years, U. S. Steel has made substantial capital expenditures to comply with various regulations, laws and other requirements relating to the environment. Such capital expenditures totaled $13 million and $7 million in ~~both~~ the first six months of 2022 and 2021, ~~and 2020.~~respectively. U. S. Steel anticipates making additional such expenditures in the future, which may be material; however, the exact amounts and timing of such expenditures are uncertain because of the continuing evolution of specific regulatory requirements.

European Union ~~(EU)~~(the EU) Environmental Requirements - Phase IV of the EU Emissions Trading System ~~(EU~~(the EU ETS) commenced on January 1, 2021 and will finish on December 31, 2030. The European Commission issued final approval of the updated 2021-2025 Slovak National Allocation table in ~~July 2021. The~~February 2022. Subsequently, the Slovak Ministry of ~~Environment's decision on USSE’s~~Environment allocated the full amount of 2022 free ~~allocation for the first five years of the Phase IV period is expected by the end of September 2021. In the fourth quarter of 2020~~allowances totaling 6.3 million EUA to USSE ~~started purchasing European Union Allowances (EUA) for the Phase IV period.~~in February and April 2022. As of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, we have pre-purchased approximately ~~2.0~~1.7 million EUA totaling ~~€67~~€111 million (approximately ~~$79~~$115 million). to cover the expected 2022 shortfall of emission allowances.

The EU’s Industrial Emissions Directive requires implementation of EU-determined best available techniques (BAT) for Iron and Steel production to reduce environmental impacts as well as compliance with BAT associated emission levels. Total capital expenditures for projects to comply with or go beyond BAT requirements were €138 million (approximately ~~$164~~$143 million) over the actual program period. These costs were partially offset by the EU funding received and may be mitigated over the next measurement periods if USSK complies with certain financial covenants, which are assessed annually. USSK complied with these covenants as of June 30, ~~2021.~~2022. If we are unable to meet these covenants in the future, USSK might be required to provide additional collateral (e.g., bank guarantee) to secure 50 percent of the EU funding received.

Environmental indemnifications – Throughout its history, U. S. Steel has sold numerous properties and businesses and many of these sales included indemnifications and cost sharing agreements related to the assets that were divested. The amount of potential environmental liability associated with these transactions and properties is not estimable due to the nature and extent of the unknown conditions related to the properties divested and deconsolidated. Aside from the environmental liabilities already recorded as a result of these transactions due to specific environmental remediation activities and cases (included in the ~~$138~~$137 million of accrued liabilities for remediation discussed above), there are no other known probable and estimable environmental liabilities related to these transactions.

Guarantees – The maximum guarantees of the indebtedness of unconsolidated entities of U. S. Steel totaled $7 million at June 30, ~~2021.~~2022.

~~-26-~~-24-

Other contingencies – Under certain lease agreements covering various equipment, U. S. Steel has the option to renew the lease or to purchase the equipment at the end of the lease term. If U. S. Steel does not exercise the purchase option by the end of the lease term, U. S. Steel guarantees a residual value of the equipment as determined at the lease inception date (totaling approximately ~~$21~~$13 million at June 30, ~~2021)~~2022). ~~NaN~~No liability has been recorded for these guarantees as the potential loss is not probable.

The Company's BR2 project in Osceola, Arkansas qualifies for financing and related economic incentives associated with the acquisition, development, construction, and operation of the facility. These incentives consist of advance lump-sum payments which are included in deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. In March 2022, the Company received a lump-sum payment of approximately $82 million as proceeds from the sale of a portion of expected future tax credits to be earned by the Company under the State of Arkansas's Recycling Tax Credit program. These funds are to be used primarily for the acquisition of project related equipment, however they may also be used for the training and development of new employees hired for the project. The Company is contingently liable for certain repayment penalties if the Company fails to meet certain employment requirements in any given period. In April 2022, the Company received a $3 million grant from Mississippi County, Arkansas, and in May 2022, the Company received a $50 million grant from the State of Arkansas Quick Action Closing Fund. Both grants pertain to the reimbursement of qualifying project costs. Deferred liabilities were recognized for each of these grants and are included in deferred credits and other noncurrent liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. For each of these incentives and grants, the balance of deferred income will be recognized into other gains, net in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations on a systematic basis over the periods in which the Company earns the granted funds by complying with the investment and employment requirements of the grant programs.

Insurance – U. S. Steel maintains insurance for certain property damage, equipment, business interruption and general liability exposures; however, insurance is applicable only after certain deductibles and retainages. U. S. Steel is self-insured for certain other exposures including workers’ compensation (where permitted by law) and auto liability. Liabilities are recorded for workers’ compensation and personal injury obligations. Other costs resulting from losses under deductible or retainage amounts or not otherwise covered by insurance are charged against income upon occurrence.

U. S. Steel uses surety bonds, trusts and letters of credit to provide whole or partial financial assurance for certain obligations such as workers’ compensation. The total amount of active surety bonds, trusts and letters of credit being used for financial assurance purposes was approximately ~~$215~~$272 million as of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, which reflects U. S. Steel’s maximum exposure under these financial guarantees, but not its total exposure for the underlying obligations. A significant portion of our trust arrangements and letters of credit are collateralized by the Credit Facility Agreement. The remaining trust arrangements and letters of credit are collateralized by restricted cash. Restricted cash, which is recorded in other current and noncurrent assets, totaled ~~$142~~$64 million and ~~$133~~$78 million at June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, respectively.

Capital Commitments – At June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, U. S. Steel’s contractual commitments to acquire property, plant and equipment totaled ~~$573 million.~~$2.128 billion.

Contractual Purchase Commitments – U. S. Steel is obligated to make payments under contractual purchase commitments, including unconditional purchase obligations. Payments for contracts with remaining terms in excess of one year are summarized below (in millions):

Remainder of 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Later
Years Total
$616 $1,136 $464 $227 $204 $842 $3,489


Remainder of 2022	2023	2024	2025	2026	Later Years	Total
$317	$652	$351	$347	$272	$745	$2,684

The majority of U. S. Steel’s unconditional purchase obligations relates to the supply of industrial gases, and certain energy and utility services with terms ranging from two to 1514 years. Unconditional purchase obligations also include coke and steam purchase commitments related to a coke supply agreement with Gateway Energy & Coke Company LLC (Gateway) under which Gateway is obligated to supply a minimum volume of the expected targeted annual production of the heat recovery coke plant, and U. S. Steel is obligated to purchase the coke from Gateway at the contract price. As of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, if U. S. Steel were to terminate the agreement, it may be obligated to pay in excess of ~~$95~~$47 million.

Total payments relating to unconditional purchase obligations were ~~$169~~$203 million and ~~$134~~$169 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively, and ~~$369~~$477 million and ~~$302~~$369 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020,~~2021, respectively.

-25-

22. Common Stock Issued and Repurchased

On October 25, 2021, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program that allowed for the repurchase of up to $300 million of its outstanding common stock from time to time in the open market or privately negotiated transactions. On January 24, 2022 the Board of Directors authorized an additional $500 million under the share repurchase program. U. S. Steel repurchased 22,513,571 shares of common stock for approximately $522 million under this program during the six months ended June 30, 2022.

On July 25, 2022, following the completion of the previously authorized $800 million share repurchase programs, the Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program that allows for the repurchase of up to $500 million of its outstanding common stock from time to time in the open market or privately negotiated transactions at the discretion of management. The Company's share repurchase program does not obligate it to acquire any specific number of shares.

In February 2021, U. S. Steel issued ~~48,300,000~~48.3 million shares of common stock for net proceeds of approximately $790 million.

~~In June 2020, U. S. Steel issued 50 million shares of common stock for net proceeds of approximately $410 million.~~

~~23.~~ ~~Subsequent Event~~

On July 23, 2021, U. S. Steel announced changes to its Credit Facility Agreement and Big River Steel ABL Facility that reward performance in meeting sustainability targets, part of the ongoing execution of the company’s Best for All℠ strategy of creating profitable pathways to sustainable steelmaking. The Credit Facility Agreement has been amended to include an increase or decrease in the margin payable based on achievement targets related to carbon reduction, safety performance and facility certifications by ResponsibleSteelTM. In addition to the new sustainability link, the Credit Facility Agreement has been amended to reduce the credit line to $1.75 billion from $2.0 billion, which is consistent with the Company's efforts to optimize its global liquidity position.


Item 2.			MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2022, the Company delivered record financial performance with all segments reporting improving or consistent results. All segments benefited from higher pricing but were also adversely impacted by higher material and energy costs. In the U.S., the Company was successful in leveraging its diverse end-market exposure and value-focused commercial strategy to deliver record second quarter performance.

The Company expects commercial headwinds from lower steel selling prices and lower demand from select end markets in our domestic and European steelmaking segments to result in a material decline in financial performance compared to the second quarter. Industry statistics and customer input suggests underlying demand remains healthy and should rebound upon signs of steel prices bottoming. The Company continues to monitor market conditions to ensure our order book and production footprint are balanced. Our diverse end-market exposure and increasingly flexible operations are expected to keep our business resilient.

In the U.S., consumer-oriented markets like automotive and appliance continue to experience supply chain production disruptions, while line pipe and energy demand is accelerating. In the third quarter, the Company expects flat-rolled steel demand to be adversely impacted by the declining steel price environment. In Europe, the conflict in Ukraine and its negative impact on raw material and energy prices are reducing manufacturing and industrial demand. As a result, in the third quarter, the Company is seeing significant margin compression as steel prices have softened while input costs remain elevated. In Tubular, the Company continues to benefit from higher pricing as demand for seamless tubular pipe from the energy market remains strong.

In February 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine and active conflict continues in the country. The war in Ukraine will likely continue to cause disruption and instability in Russia, Ukraine, as well as the markets in which we operate. The Company is constantly monitoring the situation for impacts and risks to the business and is implementing risk mitigating strategies where possible.

As a result of the invasion, governments around the world, including the European Union (EU) and the United States of America (U.S.), have enacted sanctions against Russia and Russian interests. We are complying with all applicable sanctions that impact our business.

USSE purchases certain raw materials from sources that procure supply from Russia, including natural gas and iron ore. Since the onset of the war, and before, USSE has been building its inventory of iron ore and coal and procuring them through alternate sources. Current levels of iron ore and coal are sufficient to serve customer demand in the third quarter.

With the EU prohibiting purchases of coal from suppliers in Russia, new purchases of coal originating from Russia have stopped. The Company has built up sufficient inventory on site or in-transit to meet current customer demand. Efforts to secure alternate sources of supply are underway to continue meeting demand.

Additionally, in response to sanctions, Russia has limited supply of natural gas to certain countries. We understand that the country of Slovakia has natural gas storage levels that are sufficient to cover Slovakia's consumption, and Slovakia expects additional shipments originating not from Russia, but from Norway and liquefied natural gas from the U.S. and Africa. Those shipments should be sufficient to cover the needs for the 2022/2023 winter heating season for both households as well as industry, based on the public announcement of the Slovak Ministry of Economy on July 12, 2022. While not expected, if a natural gas crisis is declared in Slovakia, operations at our USSE business could be materially adversely impacted.

Future sanctions and responsive actions in the region remain uncertain, but we continue to engage with various governmental authorities and suppliers as we navigate the volatile situation. Our team in USSE has been engaged in humanitarian efforts related to the war, and we continue to operate to support the region's people and economy.

-26-

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

U. S. Steel's results in the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 compared to the same periods in ~~2020~~2021 benefited from significantly improved business conditions ~~as certain challenges presented by~~in each of the ~~COVID-19 pandemic began to subside. Flat-~~Company's four reportable segments:

~~-27-~~

~~Rolled~~•North American Flat-Rolled (Flat-Rolled): Flat-Rolled results improved primarily due to higher steel ~~demand~~prices across most consumer and manufacturing industries, ~~pushing both spot and~~with contract prices ~~higher. In~~higher than pricing in the prior year periods. The benefit of pricing was partially offset by lower sales volume year to date and increased raw material and energy costs.

•Mini Mill: Mini Mill ~~with the acquisition of Big River Steel on January 15, 2021,~~ results ~~were added for the first time~~declined in the ~~first quarter of 2021.~~three-month period primarily from higher raw material costs, partially offset by higher steel prices across most customer and manufacturing industries. Mini Mill results improved in the six-month period primarily due to higher steel prices and volume across most customer and manufacturing industries, partially offset by higher raw material costs.

•U. S. Steel Europe (USSE): USSE results improved primarily due to ~~stronger performance~~higher steel prices, partially offset by increased raw materials and energy costs and lower sales volume.

•Tubular Products (Tubular): Tubular results improved primarily due to higher steel prices and demand from the steady increase of ~~the manufacturing and construction sectors and higher selling prices though~~drilling activity. These benefits were partially offset by continued high levels of imports persist. In Tubular, net sales increased slightly in the three months ended June 30, 2021 and decreased in the six months ended June 30, 2021 as disruptions in the oil and gas industry continue to create significant reductions of drilling activity in the U.S. and continued high levels of tubular imports persist.imports.

Net sales by segment for the three months and six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 and ~~2020~~2021 are set forth in the following table:


		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,							Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions, excluding intersegment sales)	(Dollars in millions, excluding intersegment sales)	2021		2020		% Change		2021		2020		% Change		(Dollars in millions, excluding intersegment sales)	2022		2021		% Change	2022		2021		% Change
Flat-Rolled Products (Flat-Rolled)		$	2,991	$	1,497	100	%	$	5,263	$	3,471	52	%
Flat-Rolled														Flat-Rolled	$	3,724	$	2,991	25%	$	6,678	$	5,263	27%
Mini Mill (a)	Mini Mill (a)	759		—		n/a		1,209		—		n/a		Mini Mill (a)	838		759		10%	1,556		1,209		29%
U. S. Steel Europe (USSE)		1,078		403		167	%	1,876		908		107	%
Tubular Products (Tubular)		184		182		1	%	318		437		(27)	%
USSE														USSE	1,342		1,078		24%	2,593		1,876		38%
Tubular														Tubular	381		184		107%	690		318		117%
Total sales from reportable segments	Total sales from reportable segments	5,012		2,082		141	%	8,666		4,816		80	%	Total sales from reportable segments	6,285		5,012		25%	11,517		8,666		33%
Other	Other	13		9		44	%	23		23		—	%	Other	5		13		(62)%	7		23		(70)%
Net sales	Net sales	$	5,025	$	2,091	140	%	$	8,689	$	4,839	80	%	Net sales	$	6,290	$	5,025	25%	$	11,524	$	8,689	33%
(a) Mini Mill segment added after January 15, 2021 with the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel.
(a) For the six months ended June 30, 2021 the Mini Mill segment was added after January 15, 2021 with the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel.														(a) For the six months ended June 30, 2021 the Mini Mill segment was added after January 15, 2021 with the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel.

Management’s analysis of the percentage change in net sales for U. S. Steel’s reportable business segments for the three months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 versus the three months ended June 30, ~~2020 is set forth in the following table:~~2021:

Steel Products (a)
Volume Price Mix
FX (b)
Other (c)
Net
Change
Flat-Rolled 26 % 58 % (1) % — % 17 % 100 %
Mini Mill (d)
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
USSE 87 % 77 % (14) % 18 % (1) % 167 %
Tubular (20) % 14 % 6 % — % 1 % 1 %
(a) Excludes intersegment sales
(b) Foreign currency translation effects
(c) Primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products
(d) Not applicable (n/a), Mini Mill segment added after January 15, 2021 with the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel.


	Steel Products (a)
	Volume		Price		Mix		FX (b)		Other (c)		Net Change
Flat-Rolled	2	%	25	%	(3)	%	—	%	1	%	25	%
Mini Mill	—	%	11	%	(1)	%	—	%	—	%	10	%
USSE	(8)	%	44	%	1	%	(13)	%	1	%	25	%
Tubular	27	%	86	%	(4)	%	—	%	(2)	%	107	%
(a) Excludes intersegment sales.
(b) Foreign currency translation effects.
(c) Primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.

Net sales for the three months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 compared to the same period in ~~2020~~2021 were ~~$5,025~~$6,290 million and ~~$2,091~~$5,025 million, respectively.

•For the Flat-Rolled segment the increase in sales primarily resulted from higher average realized prices ($~~357~~261 per ton) across most products and increased shipments ~~(536~~(39 thousand tons) primarily from lower value-added products.

•For the Mini Mill segment the increase in sales primarily resulted from higher average realized prices ($124 per ton) across ~~most~~all products.

•For the USSE segment the increase in sales primarily resulted from higher average realized prices ($~~273~~312 per ~~net~~ ton) ~~and increased~~across all products, partially offset by decreased shipments ~~(557~~(100 thousand tons) across ~~all~~most products.

•For the Tubular segment the increase in sales primarily resulted from higher average realized prices ($~~345~~1,094 per net ton) ~~across all products, partially offset by decreased~~and increased shipments ~~(27~~(31 thousand tons) ~~predominantly for electric resistance welded (ERW) products.~~.

~~-28-~~

Management’s analysis of the percentage change in net sales for U. S. Steel’s reportable business segments for the six months ended June 30, 2022 versus the six months ended June 30, 2021 ~~versus the~~ ~~six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2020~~ is set forth in the following table:

-27-

Steel Products (a)
Volume Price Mix
FX (b)
Other (c)
Net Change
Flat-Rolled 8 % 34 % 2 % — % 8 % 52 %
Mini Mill (d)
n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a
USSE 55 % 45 % (7) % 15 % (1) % 107 %
Tubular (38) % 6 % 4 % — % 1 % (27) %
(a) Excludes intersegment sales
(b) Foreign currency translation effects
(c) Primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products
(d) Not applicable (n/a), Mini Mill segment added after January 15, 2021 with the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel.


	Steel Products (a)
	Volume		Price		Mix		Acquisition Variance		FX (b)		Other (c)		Net Change
Flat-Rolled	(6)	%	31	%	—	%	n/a		—	%	2	%	27	%
Mini Mill (d)	(4)	%	24	%	—	%	9	%	—	%	—	%	29	%
USSE	(1)	%	49	%	—	%	n/a		(11)	%	1	%	38	%
Tubular	33	%	90	%	(4)	%	n/a		—	%	(2)	%	117	%
(a) Excludes intersegment sales.
(b) Foreign currency translation effects.
(c) Primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.
(d) Mini Mill segment added after January 15, 2021 with the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel.

Net sales for the six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 compared to the same period in ~~2020~~2021 were $11,524 million and $8,689 million, ~~and $4,839 million,~~ respectively.

•For the Flat-Rolled segment the increase in sales primarily resulted from higher average realized prices ($~~268~~369 per ton) across most products, partially offset by decreased shipments (346 thousand tons) primarily from higher value-added products.

•For the Mini Mill segment the increase in sales primarily resulted from higher realized prices ($243 per ton) across all products and increased shipments ~~(359~~(59 thousand tons) ~~primarily for cold-rolled and coated sheet products.~~as a result of the partial period of the Company's controlling interest in Big River Steel in January of 2021.

•For the USSE segment the increase in sales primarily resulted from higher average realized prices ($~~211~~331 per ~~net~~ ton) across all products, ~~and increased~~partially offset by decreased shipments ~~(799~~(33 thousand tons) across most products.

•For the Tubular segment the ~~decrease~~increase in sales primarily resulted from ~~decreased shipments (125 thousand tons) across all products, partially offset by~~ higher average realized prices ($~~228~~1,030 per net ton) ~~predominantly for seamless products.~~and increased shipments (70 thousand tons).

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $112 million and $229 million in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2022, respectively, compared to $106 million and $208 million in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2021, ~~respectively, compared to $62 million and $134 million~~respectively. The increase in expenses in the three months and six months ended June 30, ~~2020, respectively. The increase in expenses in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021~~2022 versus the same periods in ~~2020~~2021 was primarily ~~resulted~~in our Mini Mill and USSE segments from ~~increased~~higher profit, variable or incentive based ~~payments and the addition of Big River Steel with the purchase of its remaining equity interest.~~costs.

Restructuring and other charges

During the three months and six months ended June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, the Company recorded restructuring and other charges of $17 million and $34 million, respectively, compared to $31 million and $37 million ~~respectively compared to $89 million and $130 million in the~~ three months and six months ended June 30, ~~2020,~~2021, respectively. See Note 20 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.

~~Strategic projects and technology investments~~

~~We are delivering on our customer-centric and world-competitive, Best of Both~~SM ~~strategy, by combining the best of the integrated steelmaking model with the best of the mini mill steelmaking model. We are reshaping U. S. Steel to be Best for All~~SM by providing customers with profitable steel solutions for all of our stakeholders. We will continue to expand our capabilities to deliver product and process innovation to create unmatched value for our customers while enhancing our earnings profile and delivering long-term cash flow through industry cycles.

On January 15, 2021, the Company completed a significant strategic step with the acquisition of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel for approximately $625 million in cash net of $36 million and $62 million in cash and restricted cash received, respectively, and the assumption of liabilities of approximately $50 million. The results of Big River Steel are reflected within the new Mini Mill segment. The acquisition of Big River Steel increased U. S. Steel's annual raw steel production capability by 3.3 million net tons to 26.2 million net tons. The Mini Mill segment has two electric arc furnaces (EAFs), two ladle metallurgical furnace stations (LMFs), a Ruhrstahl Heraeus degasser, two continuous slab casters, a pickle line tandem cold mill, batch annealing, a temper mill and a galvanizing line. Big River Steel commenced commercial production on the second EAF during the fourth quarter of 2020, doubling its raw steel production capacity. In the second quarter, the Company announced plans to build a non-grain oriented (NGO) electrical steel line at Big River Steel. The Company expects this investment to make Big River Steel a leader in NGO electric steels by delivering product capabilities unmatched in today's market. The approximately $450 million investment is expected to be funded by cash generated from Big River Steel's robust profitability and cash flow. The 200,000 ton NGO electrical steel line is expected to deliver first coil in September 2023 and be available to meet the growing electric vehicle demand expected in the United States over the coming years.

~~In addition to the investments at Big River Steel, the Company will continue to evaluate capability-focused opportunities across the Flat-Rolled segment, including at the Gary Hot Strip Mill.~~

~~-29-~~

Operating configuration adjustments

The Company also adjusted its operating configuration in response to ~~changing market conditions including~~ global overcapacity, unfair trade practices and increases in domestic demand as a result of tariffs on imports by indefinitely and temporarily idling and then re-starting production at certain of its facilities. U. S. Steel will continue to adjust its operating configuration in order to maximize its strategy of ~~combining the~~providing Best ~~of Both leading integrated and mini mill technology.~~for All profitable steel solutions for all stakeholders.

Idled Operations

In December 2019, U. S. Steel announced that it would indefinitely idle a significant portion of Great Lakes Works due to market conditions including continued high levels of imports. The Company began idling the iron and steelmaking facilities in March 2020 and the hot strip mill rolling facility in June 2020. ~~The carrying value of the Great Lakes Works facilities that were indefinitely idled was approximately $310 million as of June 30, 2021.~~

In December 2019, the Company completed the indefinite idling of its East Chicago Tin (ECT) operations within its Flat-Rolled segment. ECT was indefinitely idled primarily due to increased tin import levels in the U.S. Additionally, U. S. Steel indefinitely idled its finishing facility in Dearborn, Michigan (which operates an electrolytic galvanizing line), during the fourth quarter of 2019. The carrying value of these facilities was approximately $15 million as of June 30, 2021.

In 2020, we took actions to adjust our footprint by ~~temporarily~~ idling certain operations ~~for an indefinite period~~ to better align production with customer demand and respond to the impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic. The operations that were initially idled in 2020 and remained idle as of June 30, ~~2021~~2022 included:

•Blast Furnace A at Granite City Works

•Lone Star Tubular Operations

•Lorain Tubular Operations

•Wheeling Machine Products coupling production facility at Hughes Springs, Texas

As of June 30, ~~2021~~2022, the carrying value of the idled fixed assets for facilities noted above was: Granite City Works Blast Furnace A, ~~$60~~$55 million; Lone Star Tubular Operations, $5 million; Lorain Tubular Operations, ~~$70 million~~$65 million; and Wheeling Machine Product's production facility, immaterial.

~~-30-~~-28-

In December 2021, the Company permanently idled the steelmaking operations at Great Lakes Works. In addition, in March 2022, the Company permanently idled the finishing facilities at its East Chicago Tin operations, which had been idled on an indefinite basis during 2019. In the second quarter 2022, the Company recognized charges of approximately $151 million for the write-off of the blast furnaces and related fixed assets for the permanent idling of the iron making process at the Company's Great Lakes Works facility. The coil finishing process at Great Lakes Works continues to operate and remains a component of the Company's operating plans.

Earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes by segment is set forth in the following table:


			Three months ended June 30,				% Change		Six months ended June 30,				% Change				Three months ended June 30,				% Change			Six months ended June 30,				% Change
		(Dollars in millions)	2021		2020				2021		2020
(Dollars in millions)															(Dollars in millions)		2022		2021					% Change		2022		2021		% Change
Flat-Rolled	Flat-Rolled		$	579	$	(329)	276	%	$	725	$	(364)	299	%	Flat-Rolled		$	777	$	579	$	1,290				$	725
Mini Mill (a)	Mini Mill (a)		284		—		n/a		416		—		n/a		Mini Mill (a)		270		284		(5)		%	548		416		32	%
USSE	USSE		207		(26)		896	%	312		(40)		880	%	USSE		280		207		35		%	544		312		74	%
Tubular	Tubular		—		(47)		100	%	(29)		(95)		69	%	Tubular		107		—		100		%	184		(29)		734	%
		Total earnings (loss) from reportable segments	1,070		(402)		366	%	1,424		(499)		385	%		Total earnings from reportable segments	1,434		1,070		34		%	2,566		1,424		80	%
Other	Other		14		(21)		167	%	22		(20)		210	%	Other		(12)		14		(186)		%	(5)		22		(123)	%
		Segment earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes	1,084		(423)		356	%	1,446		(519)		379	%		Segment earnings before interest and income taxes	1,422		1,084		31		%	2,561		1,446		77	%
Items not allocated to segments:	Items not allocated to segments:														Items not allocated to segments:
		Big River Steel - inventory step-up amortization	—		—				(24)		—					Restructuring and other charges	(17)		(31)					(34)		(37)
		Big River Steel - unrealized losses	(6)		—				(15)		—					Asset impairment charges	(151)		(28)					(157)		(28)
		Big River Steel - acquisition costs	—		—				(9)		—					Other charges, net	—		(6)					2		(48)
		Restructuring and other charges	(31)		(89)				(37)		(130)					Gains on assets sold and previously held investments	—		15					—		126
		Gain on previously held investment in Big River Steel	—						111
		Asset impairment charge	(28)		—				(28)		(263)
		Property sale	15		—				15		—
		Tubular inventory impairment	—		(24)				—		(24)
		Gain on previously held investment in UPI	—		—				—		25
		December 24, 2018 Clairton coke making facility fire	$	—	$	4			$	—	$	4
Total earnings (loss) before interest and income taxes			$	1,034	$	(532)	294	%	$	1,459	$	(907)	261	%

Total earnings before interest and income taxes															Total earnings before interest and income taxes		$	1,254	$	1,034	21		%	$	2,372	$	1,459	63	%
(a) Mini Mill segment added after January 15, 2021 with the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel.	(a) Mini Mill segment added after January 15, 2021 with the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel.														(a) Mini Mill segment added after January 15, 2021 with the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel.

Segment results for Flat-Rolled


		Three months ended June 30,						% Change		Six months ended June 30,						% Change			Three months ended June 30,						% Change		Six months ended June 30,						% Change
		2021			2020					2021			2020						2022			2021					2022			2021
Earnings (loss) before interest and taxes ($ millions)		$	579		$	(329)		276	%	$	725		$	(364)		299	%
Earnings before interest and taxes ($ millions)																		Earnings before interest and taxes ($ millions)	$	777		$	579		34	%	$	1,290		$	725		78	%
Gross margin	Gross margin	25		%	(10)		%	35	%	21		%	—		%	21	%	Gross margin	24		%	25		%	(1)	%	23		%	21		%	2	%
Raw steel production (mnt)	Raw steel production (mnt)	2,485			1,468			69	%	5,066			4,616			10	%	Raw steel production (mnt)	2,424			2,485			(2)	%	4,629			5,066			(9)	%
Capability utilization	Capability utilization	59		%	35		%	24	%	60		%	54		%	6	%	Capability utilization	74		%	59		%	15	%	71		%	60		%	11	%
Steel shipments (mnt)	Steel shipments (mnt)	2,326			1,790			30	%	4,658			4,299			8	%	Steel shipments (mnt)	2,365			2,326			2	%	4,312			4,658			(7)	%
Average realized steel price per ton	Average realized steel price per ton	$	1,078		$	721		50	%	$	983		$	715		37	%	Average realized steel price per ton	$	1,339		$	1,078		24	%	$	1,352		$	983		38	%

The increase in Flat-Rolled results for the three months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 compared to the same period in ~~2020~~2021 was primarily due to:

•increased average realized prices, including mix (approximately ~~$850~~$605 million)

•increased shipments (approximately ~~$10 million)~~

•~~increased mining sales (approximately $105~~$15 million)

•increased coke, iron ore and other non-steel sales (approximately ~~$30~~$25 million)

•favorable equity investees income (approximately $45 million),

~~this change was~~these changes were partially offset by:

•decreased non-prime sales (approximately $20 million)

•higher raw material costs (approximately ~~$15~~$215 million)

•higher energy costs (approximately $105 million)

•increased operating costs (approximately $125 million)

•higher other costs ~~primarily~~predominantly variable compensation ~~partially offset by favorable equity investee income,~~ (approximately ~~$70~~$25 million).

Gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021 decreased reflecting increased input costs, partially offset by the impact of higher realized prices.

-29-

The increase in Flat-Rolled results for the six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 compared to the same period in ~~2020~~2021 was primarily due to:

•increased average realized prices, including mix (approximately ~~$1,195~~$1,555 million)

•increased ~~mining~~coke, iron ore and other non-steel sales (approximately ~~$75~~$60 million)

•favorable equity investees income (approximately $70 million),

~~-31-~~these changes were partially offset by:

•decreased shipments (approximately $80 million)

•decreased non-prime sales (approximately $15 million)

•higher raw material costs (approximately $380 million)

•higher energy costs (approximately $180 million)

•increased ~~coke~~operating costs (approximately $315 million)

•higher other costs predominantly variable compensation (approximately $150 million).

Gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021 increased primarily as a result of higher average realized prices, partially offset by increased input costs and lower sales volume.

Segment results for Mini Mill (a)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						% Change		Six Months Ended June 30,						% Change
	2022			2021					2022			2021
Earnings before interest and taxes ($ millions)	$	270		284			(5)	%	$	548		416			32	%
Gross margin	39		%	45		%	(6)	%	42		%	41		%	1	%
Raw steel production (mnt)	750			747			—	%	1,351			1,257			7	%
Capability utilization	91		%	91		%	—	%	83		%	84		%	(1)	%
Steel shipments (mnt)	615			616			—	%	1,122			1,063			6	%
Average realized steel price per ton	$	1,331		$	1,207		10	%	$	1,349		$	1,106		22	%
(a) Mini Mill segment added after January 15, 2021 with the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel.

The decrease in Mini Mill results for the three months ended June 30, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021 was primarily due to:

•increased average realized prices, including mix (approximately ~~$30~~$105 million)

•lower other costs (approximately $5 million),

~~this change~~these changes were offset by:

•decreased shipments (approximately $15 million).

•higher raw material costs (approximately $100 million)

•higher energy costs (approximately $10 million).

Gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021 decreased primarily as a result of increased material costs, partially offset by the impact of higher realized prices.

The increase in Mini Mill results for the six months ended June 30, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021 was primarily due to:

•increased average realized prices, including mix and acquisition variance (approximately $345 million),

these changes were partially offset by:

•higher raw material costs (approximately ~~$35~~$180 million)

•higher energy costs (approximately $15 million)

•higher other costs, primarily variable compensation (approximately ~~$160~~$20 million).

Gross margin for the ~~three and~~ six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 compared to the same period in ~~2020~~2021 increased primarily as a result of higher average realized prices and sales volume, ~~and average realized prices.~~partially offset by increased raw material costs.

-30-

~~Segment results for Mini Mill~~
~~(a)~~

Three Months Ended June 30, %
Change Six Months Ended June 30, %
Change
2021 2020 2021 2020
Earnings before interest and taxes ($ millions) $ 284 $ — n/a $ 416 $ — n/a
Gross margin 45 % — % n/a 41 % — % n/a
Raw steel production (mnt) 747 — n/a 1,257 — n/a
Capability utilization 91 % — % n/a 84 % — % n/a
Steel shipments (mnt) 616 — n/a 1,063 — n/a
Average realized steel price per ton $ 1,207 $ — n/a $ 1,106 $ — n/a
(a) Mini Mill segment added after January 15, 2021 with the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel.

Segment results for USSE


		Three Months Ended June 30,						% Change		Six Months Ended June 30,						% Change			Three Months Ended June 30,						% Change		Six Months Ended June 30,						% Change
		2021			2020					2021			2020						2022			2021					2022			2021
Earnings (loss) before interest and taxes ($ millions)		$	207		$	(26)		896	%	$	312		$	(40)		880	%
Earnings before interest and taxes ($ millions)																		Earnings before interest and taxes ($ millions)	$	280		$	207		35	%	$	544		$	312		74	%
Gross margin	Gross margin	22		%	2		%	20	%	20		%	3		%	17	%	Gross margin	23		%	22		%	1	%	23		%	20		%	3	%
Raw steel production (mnt)	Raw steel production (mnt)	1,279			645			98	%	2,476			1,527			62	%	Raw steel production (mnt)	1,216			1,279			(5)	%	2,304			2,476			(7)	%
Capability utilization	Capability utilization	103		%	52		%	51	%	100		%	61		%	39	%	Capability utilization	98		%	103		%	(5)	%	93		%	100		%	(7)	%
Steel shipments (mnt)	Steel shipments (mnt)	1,167			610			91	%	2,210			1,411			57	%	Steel shipments (mnt)	1,067			1,167			(9)	%	2,177			2,210			(1)	%
Average realized steel price per ($/ton)	Average realized steel price per ($/ton)	$	905		$	632		43	%	$	831		$	620		34	%	Average realized steel price per ($/ton)	$	1,217		$	905		34	%	$	1,162		$	831		40	%
Average realized steel price per (€/ton)	Average realized steel price per (€/ton)	€	750		€	575		30	%	€	689		€	563		22	%	Average realized steel price per (€/ton)	€	1,142		€	750		52	%	€	1,064		€	689		54	%

The increase in USSE results for the three months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 compared to the same period in ~~2020~~2021 was primarily due to:

•increased average realized prices, including mix (approximately ~~$300~~$435 million)

•increased ~~shipments, including volume efficiencies~~non-steel sales (approximately ~~$30 million)~~

•~~strengthening of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar (approximately $30 million)~~

•~~increased energy efficiencies (approximately $5~~$15 million),

these changes were partially offset by:

•decreased shipments (approximately $20 million)

•higher raw material costs (approximately ~~$120~~$220 million)

•increased operating costs (approximately $5$30 million)

•higher energy costs ($55 million)

•weakening of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar (approximately $45 million).

•higher other costs (approximately ~~$10~~$5 million).

Gross margin for the three months ended June 30, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021 increased primarily as a result of higher average realized prices, partially offset by higher raw material and energy costs and lower sales volume.

The increase in USSE results for the six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 compared to the same period in ~~2020~~2021 was primarily due to:

•increased average realized prices, including mix (approximately ~~$400~~$865 million)

•increased ~~shipments, including volume efficiencies~~non-steel sales (approximately ~~$30 million)~~

•~~strengthening of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar (approximately $45 million)~~

•~~increased energy efficiencies (approximately $15 million),~~

~~these changes were partially offset by:~~

•~~higher raw material costs (approximately $120 million)~~

•~~increased operating costs (approximately $10 million)~~

•~~higher other costs (approximately $10 million).~~

~~Gross margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 compared to the same periods in 2020 increased primarily as a result of higher sales volume and higher average realized prices.~~

~~-32-~~

~~Segment results for Tubular~~

Three Months Ended June 30, %
Change Six Months Ended June 30, %
Change
2021 2020 2021 2020
Loss before interest and taxes ($ millions) $ — $ (47) 100 % $ (29) $ (95) 69 %
Gross margin 7 % (21) % 28 % (1) % (16) % 15 %
Raw steel production (mnt) (a)
114 — n/a 207 — n/a
Capability utilization (a)
51 % — % 51 % 46 % — % 46 %
Steel shipments (mnt) 105 132 (20) % 194 319 (39) %
Average realized steel price per ton $ 1,633 $ 1,288 27 % $ 1,513 $ 1,285 18 %
(a) Tubular segment raw steel added in October 2020 with the start-up of the new electric arc furnace.

~~The increase in Tubular results for the three months ended June 30, 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020 occurred despite continued high levels of imports and was primarily due to:~~

•~~increased average realized prices (approximately $35 million)~~

•~~lower other costs, primarily idled plant carrying costs, (approximately~~ $20 ~~million),~~

~~these changes were partially offset by:~~

•~~higher raw material costs (approximately $5 million)~~

•~~higher energy costs (approximately $5 million).~~

~~The increase in Tubular results for the six months ended June 30, 2021 as compared to the same period in 2020 occurred despite continued high levels of imports and was primarily due to:~~

•~~increased average realized prices (approximately $35 million)~~

•~~lower operating costs (approximately $10 million)~~

•~~lower other costs, primarily idled plant carrying costs, (approximately $40~~ million),

these changes were partially offset by:

•decreased shipments (approximately $5 million)

•higher raw material costs (approximately ~~$10~~$370 million)

•increased operating costs (approximately $70 million)

•higher energy costs (approximately $5$125 million)

•weakening of the Euro versus the U.S. dollar (approximately $55 million)

•higher other costs, primarily variable compensation (approximately $30 million).

Gross margin for the six months ended June 30, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021 increased primarily as a result of higher average realized prices, partially offset by higher raw material and energy costs and lower sales volume.

Segment results for Tubular


	Three Months Ended June 30,						% Change		Six Months Ended June 30,						% Change
	2022			2021					2022			2021
Earnings/(loss) before interest and taxes ($ millions)	$	107		$	—		100	%	$	184		$	(29)		734	%
Gross margin	30		%	7		%	23	%	30		%	(1)		%	31	%
Raw steel production (mnt)	168			114			47	%	324			207			57	%
Capability utilization	75		%	51		%	24	%	73		%	46		%	27	%
Steel shipments (mnt)	136			105			30	%	264			194			36	%
Average realized steel price per ton	$	2,727		$	1,633		67	%	$	2,543		$	1,513		68	%

-31-

The increase in Tubular results for the three months ended June 30, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021 occurred despite continued high levels of imports and was primarily due to:

•increased average realized prices, including mix (approximately $115 million)

•increased shipments, including volume efficiencies (approximately $15 million),

these changes were partially offset by:

•higher raw material costs (approximately $15 million)

•higher other costs (approximately $10 million),

Gross margin for the three ~~and six~~ months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2020~~2021 increased primarily as a result of higher average realized prices and ~~positive cost improvements from the new EAF and plant idlings, partially offset by increased raw material costs.~~sales volume.

~~Items not allocated to segments~~

•~~We recorded Big River Steel - inventory step-up amortizationchargeof $24 million~~The increase in Tubular results for the six months ended June 30, ~~2021. See Note 5~~2022 compared to the ~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.~~same period in 2021 occurred despite continued high levels of imports and was primarily due to:

•increased average realized prices, including mix (approximately $215 million)

•~~We recorded Big River Steel - unrealized losses~~increased shipments, including volume efficiencies (approximately $30 million),

these changes were partially offset by:

•increased operating costs (approximately $5 million),

•~~of $6 million and $15 million in~~higher raw material costs (approximately $20 million)

•higher other costs (approximately $5 million).

Gross margin for the ~~three months and~~ six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~, ~~respectivelyfor the post-acquisition mark-to-market impacts of hedging instruments acquired with the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel. See Note 14~~2022 compared to the ~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.~~

•~~We recorded Big River Steel - acquisition costs~~same period in 2021 increased primarily as a result of ~~$9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2021. See Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.~~

•~~We recorded restructuring~~higher average realized prices and ~~other charges of $31 million and $37 million in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2021, respectively. See Note 20 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.~~sales volume.

•~~We recorded a gain on previously held equity investmentin Big River Steelof $111 million in the six months ended June 30, 2021. See Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.~~

•~~We recorded an impairment of $28 million for the Mon Valley Works endless casting and rolling project. See Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement for further details.~~

•~~We recorded a property sale gain of $15 million on the sale of a non-core real estate asset.~~

~~-33-~~

Net interest and other financial costs


		Three Months Ended June 30,				% Change		Six Months Ended June 30,				% Change			Three Months Ended June 30,				% Change		Six Months Ended June 30,				% Change
(Dollars in millions)	(Dollars in millions)	2021		2020				2021		2020				(Dollars in millions)	2022		2021				2022		2021
Interest expense	Interest expense	$	84	$	64	(31)	%	$	176	$	114	(54)	%	Interest expense	$	39	$	84	54	%	$	89	$	176	49	%
Interest income	Interest income	(1)		(1)		—	%	(2)		(5)		(60)	%	Interest income	(4)		(1)		300	%	(5)		(2)		150	%
Loss on debt extinguishment	Loss on debt extinguishment	1		—		(100)	%	256		—		(100)	%	Loss on debt extinguishment	2		1		(100)	%	2		256		99	%
Other financial costs	Other financial costs	4		7		43	%	22		4		(450)	%	Other financial costs	16		4		(300)	%	18		22		18	%
Net periodic benefit income	Net periodic benefit income	(29)		(8)		263	%	(60)		(16)		275	%	Net periodic benefit income	(61)		(29)		110	%	(122)		(60)		103	%
Total net interest and other financial costs		$	59	$	62	5	%	$	392	$	97	(304)	%
Total net interest and other financial (benefits) costs														Total net interest and other financial (benefits) costs	$	(8)	$	59	114	%	$	(18)	$	392	105	%

Net interest and other financial (benefits) costs ~~decreased~~improved in the three months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 as compared to the same period ~~last year~~in 2021 primarily due to reduced interest expense from a reduced level of debt and an increase in net periodic benefit income, ~~(as discussed further below), partially offset by increased interest expense.~~

primarily due to lower amortization of actuarial losses.

Net interest and other financial (benefits) costs ~~increased~~improved in the six months ended June 30, ~~2021 as~~2022 compared to the same period ~~last~~in 2021 primarily due the absence of current year ~~from increased~~debt retirement losses, reduced interest expense from a reduced level of debt ~~retirement costs~~ and ~~higher other financial costs, partially offset by~~ an increase in net periodic benefit income, ~~(as discussed below).~~

~~The net periodic benefit income components of pension and other benefit costs are reflected in the table above, and increased in the three months and six months ended June 30, 2021as compared to the same periods last year~~ primarily due to ~~better than expected asset performance and~~ lower amortization of ~~prior service costs.~~actuarial losses.

Income taxes

~~The~~

Income tax expense was $284 million in the three months ended June 30, 2022 compared to an income tax benefit of $37 million in the same period in 2021. The change from the prior year period was ~~$(37)~~primarily due to the tax benefit in the prior year period resulting from the release of the valuation allowance on domestic deferred tax assets.

Income tax expense was $530 million in the six months ended June 30, 2022 compared to an income tax benefit of $36 million in the same period in 2021. The change from the prior year period was primarily due to the tax benefit in the prior year period resulting from the release of the valuation allowance on domestic deferred tax assets.

On July 8, 2022, Pennsylvania House Bill 1342 was enacted, which in part phased in a corporate net income tax (CNIT) rate reduction over nine years. The CNIT rate for the 2022 tax year is 9.99%. The CNIT rate will be reduced to 8.99% for the 2023 tax year. Starting with the 2024 tax year, the rate is reduced by 0.5% annually until it reaches 4.99% for the 2031 tax year and each year thereafter. The Company is currently assessing the impact of the law change but does not believe that it will have a material impact on its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net earnings

-32-

Net earnings attributable to United States Steel Corporation were $978 million and ~~$(36)~~$1,860 million in the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, respectively, compared to ~~$(5) million and $(24) million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively.~~

At June 30, 2021, U. S. Steel determined, based upon weighing all positive and negative evidence, that a full valuation allowance for the domestic deferred tax assets was no longer required. Accordingly, we reversed allnet earnings of the domestic valuation allowance except for a portion of the domestic valuation allowance related to certain state net operating losses and state tax credits, which resulted in a $262 million non-cash net benefit to earnings. That determination was based, in part, on U. S. Steel’s cumulative income from the past three years and projections of income in future years. The release of the valuation allowance contains discrete and current year impacts that are recorded in the income tax benefit and will be remeasured in upcoming 2021 periods.

~~The tax benefit for the six months ended June 30, 2020 includes a $14 million benefit related to recording a loss from continuing operations and income from other comprehensive income categories.~~

~~Net earnings attributable to United States Steel Corporation~~ ~~were~~ $1,012 million and $1,103 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2021, ~~respectively, compared to a net loss of $(589) million and $(980) million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2020,~~ respectively. The changes primarily reflect the factors discussed above.

~~-34-~~

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was ~~$1,103~~$1,676 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 compared to net cash ~~used~~provided by operating activities of ~~$362~~$1,103 million in the same period ~~last year.~~in 2021. The period over period increase in cash from operations iswas primarily due to ~~stronger financial results,~~higher net earnings, increases to income taxes payable and deferred income taxes, partially offset by changes in working capital ~~period over~~and losses on debt extinguishments in the prior year period. Changes in working capital can vary significantly depending on factors such as the timing of inventory production and purchases, which is affected by the length of our business cycles as well as our captive raw materials position, customer payments of accounts receivable and payments to vendors in the regular course of business.

~~Our~~As shown below our cash conversion cycle for the second quarter of ~~2021 improved~~2022 increased by ~~ten~~6 days as compared to the fourth quarter of ~~2020 as shown below:~~2021 primarily from increased inventory days due to increase in raw material inventory.


Cash Conversion Cycle	Cash Conversion Cycle	2021		2020		Cash Conversion Cycle	Second Quarter of 2022		Fourth Quarter of 2021
		$ millions	Days	$ millions	Days		$ millions	Days	$ millions	Days
Accounts receivable, net (a)	Accounts receivable, net (a)	$2,010	33	$994	38	Accounts receivable, net (a)	$2,602	36	$2,089	37

+ Inventories (b)	+ Inventories (b)	$1,914	45	$1,402	54	+ Inventories (b)	$3,014	56	$2,210	51

- Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities (c)	- Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities (c)	$2,684	64	$1,861	68	- Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities (c)	$3,288	63	$2,684	65

= Cash Conversion Cycle (d)	= Cash Conversion Cycle (d)		14		24	= Cash Conversion Cycle (d)		29		23

(a) Calculated as Average Accounts Receivable, net divided by total Net Sales multiplied by the number of days in the period.

(b) Calculated as Average Inventory divided by total Cost of Sales multiplied by the number of days in the period.

(c) Calculated as Average Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities less bank checks outstanding and other current liabilities divided by total Cost of Sales multiplied by the number of days in the period.

(d) Calculated as Accounts Receivable Days plus Inventory Days less Accounts Payable Days.

The cash conversion cycle is a non-generally accepted accounting principles (non-GAAP) financial measure. We believe the cash conversion cycle is a useful measure in providing investors with information regarding our cash management performance and is a widely accepted measure of working capital management efficiency. The cash conversion cycle should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to other GAAP metrics as an indicator of performance.

The last-in, first-out (LIFO) inventory method is the predominant method of inventory costing ~~in the United States.~~for our Flat-Rolled and Tubular segments. Based on the Company’s latest internal forecasts and its inventory requirements, management does not believe there will be significant permanent LIFO liquidations that would impact earnings for the remainder of 2022.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $602 million for the six months ended June 30, 2022 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $885 million in the same period in 2021. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to the payment of $625 million in the prior year period for the purchase of the remaining equity interest in Big River Steel, proceeds of $53 million in the current year period from government grants, partially offset by increased capital expenditures (discussed in more detail below) and lower proceeds from the sale of assets.

Capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, were ~~$284~~$660 million, compared with ~~$455~~$284 million in the same period in ~~2020.~~2021. Flat-Rolled capital expenditures were ~~$167~~$229 million ~~and included~~which includes spending for ~~Mon Valley~~the construction of a pig iron facility and hot strip mill upgrades at Gary Works, ~~Endless Casting~~as well as mining equipment and ~~Rolling, Gary Hot Strip Mill upgrades, Mining Equipment and various~~ other infrastructure, environmental, and strategic ~~projects.~~projects across the NAFR footprint. Mini Mill capital expenditures were ~~$56~~$390 million and ~~primarily~~ included $230 million for BR2 being built in Osceola, Arkansas, as well as spending for ~~Phase II expansion.~~the new continuous galvanizing line (CGL) and Non-Grain Oriented electrical steel facility being built at the existing Big River Steel facility. USSE ~~capital expenditures of $26 million consisted of spending for Degasser improvements, Dynamo Line and various other infrastructure, and environmental projects. Tubular~~ capital expenditures were $34 million and included spending for the ~~Fairfield Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) project~~blast furnace stove, 5-stand control system and rail bridge upgrades and various other projects. Tubular capital expenditures were $7 million and included spending to support steelmaking, infrastructure, and environmental ~~projects.~~projects at Fairfield.

~~U. S. Steel’s contractual commitments to acquire property, plant and equipment at June 30, 2021, totaled $573 million.~~

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities

Net cash used byin financing activities was ~~$855~~$548 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 compared to net cash ~~provided~~used in financing activities of ~~$2,306~~$855 million in the same period last year. The ~~decrease was primarily due to the repayment of debt, partially offset by the issuance of common stock.~~

~~The following table summarizes U. S. Steel’s liquidity as of June 30, 2021:~~


~~(Dollars in millions)~~
~~Cash and cash equivalents~~	$	~~1,329~~
~~Amount available under Credit Facility Agreement~~	~~1,918~~
~~Amount available under Big River Steel - Revolving Line of Credit~~	~~350~~
~~Amount available under USSK credit facilities~~	~~579~~
~~Total estimated liquidity~~	$	~~4,176~~

period over period increase in cash from financing activities

~~-35-~~-33-

Inwas primarily due to the ~~first half~~absence of ~~2021, we issued 48,300,000 shares~~significant current year debt repayments and current year proceeds from government grants, partially offset by the absence of current year common stock issuances and the current year repurchase of common stock for net proceeds of approximately $790 million and issued $750 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.875% Senior Notes due 2029 (2029 Senior Notes) for net proceeds of $739 million after transaction costs. With the common stock and 2029 Senior Notes issuance proceeds and cash on hand we fully redeemed our 12.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2025 in the aggregate principal amount of $1.056 billion plus premiums of $181 million, repaid in full our Export-Import Credit Agreement in the amount of $180 million and reduced the borrowing under our Credit Facility Agreement and USSK Facility Agreement by $500 million and $368 million, respectively. See Note 15 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.stock.

On June 17, 2021, U. S. Steel issued an irrevocable notice of redemption to redeem the entirety of its approximately $718 million aggregate principal amount of outstanding 6.875% Senior Notes due 2025 (2025 Senior Notes). The Company expects the total payment to the holders including the redemption premium to be approximately $730 million (reflecting a redemption price of 101.719% of the aggregate principal amount), plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the redemption date of August 15, 2021. The 2025 Senior Notes will be redeemed with cash on hand. The 2025 Senior Notes are reflected in short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2021.

With the acquisition of Big River Steel on January 15, 2021 we assumed additional indebtedness. Below is a summary of the most significant debt acquired as of June 30, 2021. See Note 15 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.

•~~6.625% Senior Secured Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $900 million that mature in January 2029;~~

•~~4.50% Arkansas Development Finance Authority Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $487 million that have a final maturity in September 2049;~~

•~~4.75% Arkansas Development Finance Authority Bonds Tax Exempt Series 2020 (Green Bonds) in the aggregate principal amount of $265 million that have a final maturity in September 2049;~~

•~~Arkansas Teacher Retirement System Notes Payable in the amount of $106 million that mature in 2023.~~

As of June 30, 2021, $107 million of the total cash and cash equivalents was held by foreign subsidiaries. Substantially all of the liquidity attributable to our foreign subsidiaries can be accessed without the imposition of income taxes as a result of the election effective December 31, 2013 to liquidate for U.S. income tax purposes a foreign subsidiary that holds most of our international operations.

On April 12, 2021, United States Steel Corporation entered into a Notice and Acknowledgement with the Export Credit Agreement (ECA) lender, facility agent and ECA agent, KFW IPEX-BANK GMBH to acknowledge that the previously announced endless casting and rolling project at Mon Valley Works would no longer be pursued and the associated equipment for the project is now being evaluated for other uses. Use of the Export-Credit Agreement for further equipment purchases is also being evaluated. As of June 30, 2021, $136 million was owed on the ECA.Debt Financing

Certain of our credit facilities, including the Credit Facility Agreement, the Big River Steel ABL Facility, the USSK Credit Agreement and the Export Credit Agreement, contain standard terms and conditions including customary material adverse change clauses. If a material adverse change was to occur, our ability to fund future operating and capital requirements could be negatively impacted.

We may from time to time seek to retire or repurchase our outstanding long-term debt through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, exchange transactions, redemptions or otherwise. Such purchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, and other factors and may be commenced or suspended at any time. The amounts involved may be material. See Note 15 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details regarding U. S. Steel's debt.

We use surety bonds, trusts and letters of credit to provide financial assurance for certain transactions and business activities. The use of some forms of financial assurance and cash collateral have a negative impact on liquidity. U. S. Steel has committed ~~$215~~approximately $272 million of liquidity sources for financial assurance purposes as of June 30, ~~2021.~~2022. Increases in certain of these commitments which use collateral are reflected within cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

InShare Repurchases

Common stock repurchased under our share repurchase program that was approved in October ~~2020,~~2021 and increased in January 2022 totaled 22,513,571 shares and approximately $522 million in the ~~Company entered into a supply chain finance agreement with a third-party administrator with an initial term of one year which is guaranteed by~~six months ended June 30, 2022. On July 25, 2022, following the ~~Export Import Bank~~completion of the ~~United States (Ex-Im Guarantee). See our Annual Report on Form 10-K~~previously authorized $800 million share repurchase programs, the Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program that allows for the ~~year-ended December 31, 2020~~repurchase of up to $500 million of its outstanding common stock from time to time in the open market or privately negotiated transactions at the discretion of management. The Company's share repurchase program does not obligate it to acquire any specific number of shares. See Note 22 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details. As

Capital Requirements

U. S. Steel’s contractual commitments to acquire property, plant and equipment at June 30, 2022, totaled $2.128 billion.

Liquidity

The following table summarizes U. S. Steel’s liquidity as of June 30, 2021, accounts payable and accrued expenses included $75 million of outstanding payment obligations which suppliers elected to sell to participating financial institutions. Access to supply chain financing could be curtailed in the future if the terms of the Ex-Im Guarantee are modified or if our credit ratings are downgraded. If access to supply chain financing is curtailed, working capital could be negatively impacted which may necessitate additional borrowing.2022:


(Dollars in millions)
Cash and cash equivalents	$	3,035
Amount available under Credit Facility Agreement	1,746
Amount available under Big River Steel - Revolving Line of Credit	350
Amount available under USSK Credit Agreement and USSK Credit Facility	317
Total estimated liquidity	$	5,448

In the first half of 2022, we received $82 million in proceeds from government incentives for the construction of BR2, from the sale of tax credits under the State of Arkansas's Recycling Tax Credit program. The Company is contingently liable for certain repayment penalties if it fails to meet certain employment requirements. In addition, the Company received government grants totaling $53 million for the reimbursement of qualifying project costs related to the construction of BR2. This amount primarily consists of a $50 million grant from the State of Arkansas Quick Action Closing Fund. See Note 21 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further details.

We finished the second quarter of ~~2021~~2022 with ~~$1,329~~$3,035 million of cash and cash equivalents and ~~$4,176~~$5,448 million of total liquidity. Available cash is left on deposit with financial institutions or invested in highly liquid securities with parties we believe to be creditworthy. ~~U. S. Steel management believes that our~~Substantially all of the liquidity ~~will be adequate to fund our requirements based on our current assumptions with respect~~attributable to our ~~results~~foreign subsidiaries can be accessed without the imposition of ~~operations and financial condition.~~

~~-36-~~

income taxes as a result of a prior election to liquidate for U.S. income tax purposes a foreign subsidiary that holds most of our international operations.

We expect that our estimated liquidity requirements will consist primarily of the remaining portion of our ~~2021~~2022 planned strategic and sustaining capital expenditures, ~~additional debt repayment,~~ working capital requirements, interest expense, and operating costs and employee benefits for our operations after taking into account ~~recent~~the footprint actions and cost reductions at our plants and headquarters. Our available

-34-

liquidity at June 30, ~~2021~~2022 consists principally of our cash and cash equivalents and available borrowings under the Credit Facility Agreement, Big River Steel ABL Facility, USSK Credit Agreement and the USSK Credit ~~Facilities.~~Facility. Management continues to evaluate market conditions in our industry and our global liquidity position, and may consider additional actions to further strengthen our balance sheet and optimize liquidity, including but not limited to the repayment or refinancing of outstanding debt and the incurrence of additional debt or the issuance of additional debt or equity securities, drawing on available capacity under the Credit Facility Agreement, Big River Steel ABL Facility and/or the USSK Credit Facilities, or reducing outstanding borrowings under those facilitiesto opportunistically finance strategic projects. The Company may also return excess liquidity to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends from time to time if deemed appropriate by management.

U. S. Steel management believes that our liquidity will be adequate to fund our requirements based on our current assumptions with respect to our results of operations and financial condition.

Environmental Matters, Litigation and Contingencies

Some of U. S. Steel’s facilities were in operation before 1900. Although the Company believes that its environmental practices have either led the industry or at least been consistent with prevailing industry practices, hazardous materials have been and may continue to be released at current or former operating sites or delivered to sites operated by third parties.

Our U.S. facilities are subject to environmental laws applicable in the U.S., including the Clean Air Act ~~(CAA)~~(the CAA), the Clean Water Act (CWA), the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), as well as state and local laws and regulations.

U. S. Steel has incurred and will continue to incur substantial capital, operating, and maintenance and remediation expenditures as a result of environmental laws and regulations, related to release of hazardous materials, which in recent years have been mainly for process changes to meet the CAA obligations and similar obligations in Europe.

EU Environmental Requirements and Slovak Operations

Phase IV of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) commenced on January 1, 2021, and will finish on December 31, 2030. The European Commission issued final approval of the updated 2021-2025 Slovak National Allocation table in ~~July 2021. The~~February 2022. Subsequently, the Slovak Ministry of ~~Environment's decision on USSE’s~~Environment allocated the full amount of 2022 free ~~allocation for the first five years of the Phase IV period is expected by the end of September 2021. In the fourth quarter of 2020~~allowances totaling 6.3 million EUA to USSE ~~started purchasing EUA for the Phase IV period.~~in February and April 2022. As of June ~~31, 2021,~~30, 2022, we have pre-purchased approximately ~~2.0~~1.7 million EUA totaling ~~€67~~€111 million (approximately ~~$79~~$115 million). to cover the expected 2022 shortfall emission allowances.

The EU’s Industrial Emissions Directive requires implementation of EU determined best available techniques (BAT) for Iron and Steel production to reduce environmental impacts as well as compliance with BAT associated emission levels. Total capital expenditures for projects to comply with or go beyond BAT requirements were €138 million (approximately ~~$164~~$143 million) over the actual program period. These costs were partially offset by the EU funding received and may be mitigated over the next measurement periods if USSK complies with certain financial covenants, which are assessed annually. USSK complied with these covenants as of June 30, ~~2021.~~2022. If we are unable to meet these covenants in the future, USSK might be required to provide additional collateral (e.g., bank guarantee) to secure 50 percent of the EU funding received.

For further discussion of laws applicable in Slovakia and the EU and their impact on USSE, see Note 21 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, “Contingencies and Commitments - Environmental Matters, EU Environmental Requirements.”

New and Emerging Environmental Regulations

United States and European Greenhouse Gas Emissions Regulations

Future compliance with CO2 emission requirements may include substantial costs for emission allowances, restriction of production and higher prices for coking coal, natural gas and electricity generated by carbon-based systems. Because we cannot predict what requirements ultimately will be imposed in the U.S. and Europe, it is difficult to estimate the likely impact on U. S. Steel, but it could be substantial. On March 28, 2017, President Trump signed Executive Order 13783 instructing the United States Environmental Protection Agency ~~(U.S.~~(the U.S. EPA) to review the Clean Power Plan ~~(CPP)~~(the CPP). As a result, in June 2019, the U.S. EPA published a final rule, the “Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Rule” that replaced the CPP. Twenty-three states, the District of Columbia, and seven municipalities are challenging the CPP repeal and ACE rule in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (the D.C.) Circuit. A coalition of 21 states has intervened in the litigation in support of the U.S. EPA. Various other public interest organizations, industry groups, and ~~Members~~members of Congress are also participating in the litigation. On January 19, 2021, the ~~District of Columbia~~D.C. Circuit vacated and remanded the ACE to the U.S. EPA, while the CPP remains stayed. On October 19, 2021, the United States Supreme Court granted petitions for certiorari filed by the State of West Virginia and others. Oral arguments regarding the petitions were held before the U.S. Supreme Court on February 28, 2022. On June 30, 2022, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of West Virginia. It ~~is unclear as~~found that Congress never intended to ~~how~~grant EPA such broad authority to totally revamp the ~~new Biden administration will proceed with~~energy sector; and noted, in particular, EPA’s attempt to impose what would be a cap-and-trade for CO2 has consistently been rejected by Congress. The Court concluded that Section 111(d) of the ~~remand. Any impacts~~Clean Air Act did not grant EPA the authority to ~~our operations as a result of any future greenhouse gas regulations are not estimable at this time since~~devise emissions caps based on the ~~matter is unsettled. In any case, to~~generation shifting approach the ~~extent expenditures associated with any greenhouse gas regulation, as with all costs, are not ultimately reflected~~Agency took in the ~~prices of~~CPP. There is no direct regulatory impact on U. S. ~~Steel's products and services, operating results will be reduced.~~Steel from this decision.

~~-37-~~-35-

The Phase IV EU ETS period spans 2021-2030 and began on January 1, 2021.The Phase IV period is divided into two sub periods (2021-2025 and 2026-2030), rules for the first subperiod are ~~still being~~ finalized, ~~and~~however we expect that rules for the second subperiod may ~~differ between~~be more stringent than those for the ~~periods.~~first one. Currently, the overall EU target is a 40 percent reduction of 1990 emissions by 2030. Free allocation of CO2 allowances is based on reduced benchmark values which have been published in the first quarter of 2021 and historical levels of production from 2014-2018. Allocations to individual installations may be adjusted annually to reflect relevant increases and decreases in production. The threshold for adjustments is set at 15 percent and will be assessed on the basis of a rolling average of two precedent years. Production data verified by an external auditor shows that USSE ~~missed~~rolling average for 2020-2021 returned to base limit for hot metal production resulting in increase of the free allocation for 2022 compared to 2021, however 2022 free allocation was still slightly reduced due to missing the 15 percent threshold ~~in 2019-20; therefore, the free allocation~~ for ~~2021 will be decreased.~~sinter and coke production. Additionally, lower production in 2019 ~~and 2020~~through 2021 will have an impact on the future free allocation for 2026-2030, where the historical production average for years 2019-2023 will be assessed. Once approved, the rules may impact subperiod 2026-2030.

In order to achieve the EU political goal of carbon emissions neutrality by 2050, on July 14, 2021, the European Commission released a package of legislative proposals called Fit for 55. The proposals contain significant changes to current EU ETS functions and requirements, including: a new carbon border adjustment mechanism ~~(CBAM)~~ to impose carbon fees on EU imports, further reduction of free CO2 allowance allocation to heavy industry and measures to strengthen the supply of carbon allowances. The proposals are subject to the EU legislative process, and we cannot predict their future impact.

United States - Air

The CAA imposes stringent limits on air emissions with a federally mandated operating permit program and civil and criminal enforcement sanctions. The CAA requires, among other things, the regulation of hazardous air pollutants through the development and promulgation of National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) and Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) Standards. The U.S. EPA has developed various industry-specific MACT standards pursuant to this requirement. The CAA requires the U.S. EPA to promulgate regulations establishing emission standards for each category of Hazardous Air Pollutants. The U.S. EPA also must conduct risk assessments on each source category that is already subject to MACT standards and determine if additional standards are needed to reduce residual risks.

While our operations are subject to several different categories of NESHAP and MACT standards, the principal impact of these standards on U. S. Steel's operations includes those that are specific to coke making, iron making, steel making and iron ore processing.

On July 13, 2020, the U.S. EPA published a Residual Risk and Technology Review ~~(RTR)~~ rule for the Integrated Iron and Steel MACT category in the Federal Register. Based on the results of the U.S. EPA’s risk review, the agency determined that risks due to emissions of air toxics from the Integrated Iron and Steel category are acceptable and that the current regulations provided an ample margin of safety to protect public health. Under the technology review, the U.S. EPA determined that there are no developments in practices, processes or control technologies that necessitate revision of the standards. In September 2020, several petitions for review of the rule, including those filed by the Company, the American Iron and Steel Institute ~~(AISI)~~(the AISI), Clean Air Council and others, were filed with the United States Court of Appeals for the ~~District of Columbia~~D.C. Circuit. The cases were consolidated and are being held in abeyance until the U.S. EPA reviews and responds to administrative petitions for review. U.S. EPA is required by court order to issue a final rule by October 26, 2023. Because U.S. EPA has yet to propose a revised iron and steel rule, any impacts are inestimable at this time.

For the Taconite Iron Ore Processing category, based on the results of the U.S. EPA's risk review, the agency promulgated a final rule on July 28, 2020, in which the U.S. EPA determined that risks from emissions of air toxics from this source category are acceptable and that the existing standards provide an ample margin of safety. Furthermore, under the technology review, the agency identified no cost-effective developments in controls, practices, or processes to achieve further emissions reductions. ~~Based upon our analysis of the proposed taconite rule, the Company does not expect any material impact as a result of the rule. However, petitions~~Petitions for review of the rule were filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the ~~District of Columbia~~D.C. Circuit, in which the Company and the AISI intervened. U.S. EPA is required by court order to issue a final rule by November 16, 2023. Because U.S. EPA has yet to propose a revised taconite rule, any impacts are inestimable at this time.

U.S. EPA is in the process of conducting its statutorily obligated residual risk and technology review of coke oven standards. Because the U.S. EPA has not completed its review of the Coke MACT regulations, any impacts related to the U.S. EPA’s review of the coke standards cannot be estimated at this time.

~~On March 12, 2018,~~In response to Court orders that invalidated prior U. S. EPA determinations regarding ozone attainment interference, on April 6, 2022, U.S. EPA proposed a Federal Implementation Plan (that would replace several pending or disapproved State Implementation Plans) for Regional Ozone Transport for the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), along with other petitioners, submitted a CAA Section 126(b) petition to the U.S. EPA. In the petition, the DEC asserts that stationary sources from the following nine states are interfering with attainment or maintenance of the 2008 and 2015 ~~ozone~~Ozone National Ambient Air Quality ~~Standards (NAAQS)~~Standard. The proposed rule would affect electric generating units (EGUs) in ~~New York: Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia,~~26 states and ~~West Virginia. DEC is requesting the U.S. EPA to require sources of nitrogen oxides~~certain non-EGU industries, including, among several others, coke ovens, taconite production kilns, boilers, blast furnaces, basic oxygen furnaces, reheating furnaces, and annealing furnaces in ~~the nine~~23 states, to reduce such emissions. In a final rule promulgated in the October 18, 2019, Federal Register, the U.S. EPA denied the petition. On October 29, 2019, New York, New Jersey, and the City of New York petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for reviewincluding those where U. S. Steel has operations. The impacts of the ~~U.S. EPA’s denial of~~rule, if promulgated as proposed, could be material. U. S. Steel submitted comments on the petition. In July 2020, the Court vacated the U.S. EPA’s determination and remanded it back to the U.S. EPA to reconsider the 126(b) petition in a manner consistent with the Court’s opinion. At this time, since the U.S. EPA’s decision after its reconsideration is unknown, the impacts of any reconsideration are indeterminable and inestimable.proposed rule on June 21, 2022.

The CAA also requires the U.S. EPA to develop and implement NAAQS for criteria pollutants, which include, among others, particulate matter (PM) - consisting of PM10 and PM2.5, lead, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide (SO2), and ozone.

-36-

In October 2015, the U.S. EPA lowered the NAAQS for ozone from 75 parts per billion (ppb) to 70 ppb. On November 6, 2017, the U.S. EPA designated most areas in which we operate as attainment with the 2015 standard. In a separate ruling, on June 4, 2018, the U.S. EPA designated other areas in which we operate as “marginal nonattainment” with the 2015 ozone standard. On December 6, 2018, the U.S. EPA published a final rule regarding implementation of the 2015 ozone standard. Because no state regulatory or permitting actions to bring the ozone nonattainment areas into attainment have yet to be proposed or developed for

~~-38-~~

U. S. Steel facilities, the operational and financial impact of the ozone NAAQS cannot be reasonably estimated at this time. On December 31, 2020, the U.S. EPA published a final rule pursuant to its statutorily required review of NAAQS that retains the ozone NAAQS at 70 ppb. In January 2021, New York, along with several states and non-governmental organizations filed petitions for judicial review of the action with the United States Court of Appeals for the ~~District of Columbia~~D.C. Circuit. Several other states and industry trade groups intervened in support of the U. S. EPA’s action. The case remains in abeyance before the ~~Court.~~court until December 15, 2023, as the U.S. EPA voluntarily reconsiders the ozone NAAQS. Because the U.S. EPA has yet to complete its reconsideration and propose a revised ozone NAAQS, any impacts are inestimable at this time.

On December 14, 2012, the U.S. EPA lowered the annual standard for PM2.5 from 15 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) to 12 ug/m3, and retained the PM2.5 24-hour and PM10 NAAQS rules. In December 2014, the U.S. EPA designated some areas in which U. S. Steel operates as nonattainment with the 2012 annual PM2.5 standard. On April 6, 2018, the U.S. EPA published a notice that Pennsylvania, California and Idaho failed to submit a ~~SIP~~State Implementation Plan (an SIP) to demonstrate attainment with the 2012 fine particulate standard by the deadline established by the CAA. As a result of the notice, Pennsylvania, a state in which we operate, was required to submit ~~a State Implementation Plan (SIP)~~an SIP to the U.S. EPA no later than November 7, 2019 to avoid sanctions. On April 29, 2019, the ~~ACHD~~Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) published a draft SIP for the Allegheny County nonattainment area which demonstrates that all of Allegheny County will meet its reasonable further progress requirements and be in attainment with the 2012 PM2.5 annual and 24-hour NAAQS by December 31, 2021, with the existing controls that are in place. On September 12, 2019, the Allegheny County Board of Health unanimously approved the draft SIP. The draft SIP was then sent to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP). PADEP submitted the SIP to the U.S. EPA for approval on November 1, 2019. To date, the U.S. EPA has not taken action on PADEP’s submittal. On December 18, 2020, the U.S. EPA published a final rule pursuant to its statutorily required review of NAAQS that retains the existing PM2.5 standards without revision. In early 2021, several states and non-governmental organizations filed petitions for judicial review of the action with the United States Court of Appeals for the ~~District of Columbia~~D.C. Circuit. Several industry trade groups intervened in support of the U.S. EPA’s action. The case remains in abeyance before the ~~Court.~~court until March 1, 2023, as U.S. EPA voluntarily reconsiders the PM2.5 NAAQS. In court filings, U.S. EPA advised the Court that it intends to complete its reconsideration process by proposing a rule in Summer 2022 and promulgating a final rule in Spring 2023. Because U.S. EPA has yet to complete its reconsideration and propose a revised PM2.5 NAAQS, any impacts are inestimable at this time.

On January 26, 2021, ACHD announced that for the first time in history all eight air quality monitors in Allegheny County met the federal air quality standards including, in particular sulfur dioxide and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10).

Preliminary data from 2021 indicates that all eight air quality monitors continue to meet the standards. On ~~November 20,~~March 16, 2022, U.S. EPA published a final rule, a clean data determination, showing that Allegheny County has attained the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS based on the 2018 – 2020 ambient air quality data. Based on these data, ACHD ~~proposed a reduction~~is in the process of seeking EPA approval to redesignate the current allowable emissions from coke plant operations, including the hydrogen sulfide content of coke oven gas, that would be more stringent than the Federal Best Available Control Technology and Lowest Achievable Emission Rate requirements. In various meetings with ACHD, U. S. Steel has raised significant objections, in particular, that ACHD has not demonstrated that continuous compliancearea as attainment with the draft rule is economically and technologically feasible. While U. S. Steel continues to meet with ACHD regarding the draft rule, U. S. Steel believes that any rule promulgated by ACHD must comply with its statutory authority. If the draft rule or similar rule is adopted, the financial and operational impacts to U. S. Steel could be material. To assist in developing rules objectively and with adequate technical justification, the June 27, 2019, Settlement Agreement, establishes procedures that would be used when developing a new rule. Because U. S. Steel believes ACHD did not follow the procedures prescribed in the June 27, 2019 Settlement Agreement (Agreement) with ACHD, U. S. Steel has invoked dispute resolution per the terms of the Agreement regarding ACHD’s proposed coke rule. U. S. Steel and ACHD are currently negotiating resolution of the disputes.2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS.

For further discussion of relevant environmental matters, including environmental remediation obligations, see "Item 1. Legal Proceedings - Environmental Proceedings."

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

U. S. Steel did not enter into any new material off-balance sheet arrangements during the second quarter of ~~2021.~~2022.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE

U. S. Steel continues to face import competition, much of which is unfairly traded ~~supported by foreign governments,~~ and fueled by massive global steel overcapacity, currently estimated to be over ~~625~~500 million metric tons per year—more than ~~seven~~five times the entire U.S. steel market and ~~more than thirty~~over nineteen times total U.S. steel imports. These imports ~~as well as the underlying policies/practices~~ and overcapacity negatively impact the Company’s operational and financial performance. U. S. Steel continues to lead efforts to address these challenges that threaten the Company, our workers, our stockholders, and our country’s national and economic security.

As of the date of this filing, pursuant to a series of Presidential Proclamations issued in accordance with Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, U.S. imports of certain steel products are subject to a 25 percent tariff, except ~~for~~ imports from: (1) Argentina, Brazil, and South Korea, which are subject to restrictive quotas; (2) the European Union (EU), Japan, and the United Kingdom (UK) that are melted and poured in the EU/Japan/UK, within quarterly tariff-rate quota (TRQ) limits; (3) Canada and Mexico, which are not subject to ~~either~~ tariffs or quotas, but tariffs could be re-imposed on surging product groups after consultations; (4) Ukraine, which was granted a one-year tariff exemption until June 1, 2023; and ~~(3)~~(5) Australia, which isare not subject to tariffs, quotas, or an anti-surge mechanism. The Section 232 TRQs on Japan went into effect on April 1, 2022. The Section 232 TRQs on the UK and the one-year Section 232 tariff exemption for Ukraine went into effect on June 1, 2022.

The U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) is managing a process in which U.S. companies may request and/or oppose ~~one-year~~ temporary product exclusions from the Section 232 tariffs and quotas. ~~Over 276,000 temporary exclusions have been requested~~U. S. Steel opposes exclusion requests for ~~steel products.~~

imported products that are the same as, or substitutes for, products manufactured by U. S. Steel.

~~-39-~~-37-

Multiple legal challenges to the Section 232 action continue before the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)~~. U.S. courts have~~, the latter which has consistently rejected constitutional and statutory challenges to the initial steel Section 232 action and overall product exclusion process. Multiple countries have challenged the Section 232 action at the World Trade Organization (WTO), imposed retaliatory tariffs, and/or acted to safeguard their domestic steel industries from increased steel imports. In turn, the United States has challenged the retaliation at the WTO.

~~In May 2021, the United States and the EU agreed to begin discussions to address global steel overcapacity and the~~ Section 232 action. The EU suspended the doubling of Section 232 retaliation scheduled for June 2021 for six months until December 2021. In June 2021, the United States and the EU issued a joint statement committing to complete discussions on a wide range of trade issues including overcapacity and the Section 232 action and retaliation by the end of 2021.

Since its implementation in March 2018, the Section 232 action has supported the U.S. steel ~~industry's~~industry’s and U. S. Steel’s investments in advanced steel production capabilities, technology, and skills, ~~thereby~~ strengthening U.S. national and economic security. The Company continues to actively defend the Section 232 action.

In February 2019, the European Commission (EC) ~~imposed~~implemented a definitive ~~tariff rate quota~~ safeguard on global steel imports in the form of TRQs that impose 25 percent tariffs on ~~certain~~ steel imports that exceed ~~established quotas. In June 2021,~~ the ~~EC voted to extend the safeguard for an additional three years, until~~TRQ limit, effective through June 2024.

Antidumping duties (AD) and countervailing duties (CVD or ~~anti-subsidy~~antisubsidy duties) ~~are applied to certain steel product imports~~apply in addition to the Section 232 ~~measures in~~tariffs, quotas, TRQs and the ~~United States or the steel~~EC’s safeguard, ~~in the EU,~~ and AD/CVD orders ~~will~~may continue beyond the Section 232 action and the EC’s safeguard. U. S. Steel continues to actively defend and maintain the 5560 U.S. AD/CVD orders and 12 EU AD/CVD orders covering ~~products that can be manufactured by~~ U. S. Steel products in multiple proceedings before the DOC, U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), CIT, CAFC, the EC and European courts, and the WTO.

The ITC and DOC are conducting new AD/CVD investigations on imports of OCTG from Argentina, Mexico, Korea, and Russia that are expected to conclude by November 2022. In ~~June 2021,~~July 2022, the ~~DOC made a final affirmative determination that corrosion-resistant steel (CORE) from Malaysia made from Chinese and Taiwanese substrate circumvent~~ITC voted to continue the AD/CVD orders on ~~CORE~~corrosion-resistant steel from China, India, Italy, South Korea and Taiwan ~~resulting in~~and cold-rolled steel from China, India, Japan, South Korea, and the UK for another five years, but voted to revoke the AD/CVD ~~between 4 and 248 percent~~orders on ~~such imports. In the EU, in April 2021, the EC announced definitive 4.7 to 7.3 percent AD duties~~cold-rolled steel from Brazil. The ITC continues its five-year "sunset" reviews of AD/CVD orders on ~~EU imports of~~ hot-rolled steel from ~~Turkey, effective July 2021. In June 2021, the~~eight countries, with decisions to continue or revoke those orders expected in October 2022.

The EC ~~initiated~~is conducting new AD investigations ~~of EU~~on imports of hot-dipped galvanized steel from Russia and Turkey, with a final decision expected this year.

In April, the United States suspended normal trade relations with Russia and ~~Russia.~~Belarus, resulting in higher normal tariffs on imports from Russia and Belarus, including steel and raw materials. In June, President Biden announced additional tariff increases on certain products from Russia, including certain steel products and ferroalloys, effective August 1, 2022.

Additional tariffs of 7.5 to 25 percent continue to apply to certain U.S. imports from China, including certain raw materials used in steel production, semi-finished and finished steel products, and downstream ~~steel~~steel-intensive products, pursuant to Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. The United States Trade Representative (USTR) is currently conducting a statutory review of the Section 301 tariffs.

The United States and EU are currently negotiating a global arrangement on steel overcapacity and carbon intensity that is targeted for completion by the end of 2023.

U. S. Steel will continue to execute a broad, global strategy to maximize opportunities and navigate challenges presented by imports, global steel overcapacity, and international trade law and policy developments.

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

See Notes 2 and 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.


Item 3.			QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, see Item 7A “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2020,~~2021, there were no material changes in U. S. Steel's exposure to market risk from December 31, ~~2020.~~2021.


Item 4.			CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

U. S. Steel has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, ~~2021.~~2022. These disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and other procedures that were designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports that are filed with or submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission are: (1) accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures and (2) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable law and regulations. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, U. S. Steel’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

-38-

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There have not been any changes in U. S. Steel’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this quarterly report, which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, U. S. Steel’s internal control over financial reporting.

~~-40-~~

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

GENERAL LITIGATION

On June 8, 2021, JSW Steel (USA) Inc. and JSW Steel USA Ohio, Inc. (collectively, JSW), U.S. based subsidiaries of Indian steelmaker JSW Steel, filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas against Nucor, U. S. Steel, AK Steel Holding Group and Cleveland-Cliffs (collectively, the JSW Defendants) alleging that the Defendants operated as a cartel and formed a conspiracy to boycott JSW from obtaining semi-finished steel slabs. JSW alleges that the JSW Defendants acted in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act (federal antitrust), and violation of the Texas Free Enterprise and Antitrust Act. JSW also alleges that the JSW Defendants formed a civil conspiracy in violation of Texas common law, and that the JSW Defendants tortiously interfered with JSW’s business relationships. The basis for JSW’s allegations relate to the JSW Defendants participation in the ~~U. S. Department of Commerce’s~~DOC's Section 232 process, including the JSW Defendants’ support of the enactment of the President’s Section 232 proclamation, statements made by the JSW Defendants after the enactment of Section 232, and the JSW Defendants’ participation in the Section 232 exclusion process. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages including $45 million for payment of Section 232 tariffs and unspecified amounts for financial penalties, termination fees and lost profits as well as other damages. ~~The Company intends to vigorously defend the matter.~~

On January 22, 2021, NLMK Pennsylvania, LLC and NLMK Indiana, LLC (NLMK) filed a Complaint in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, Pennsylvania against the Company. The Complaint alleges that the Company made misrepresentations to the U. S. ~~Department of Commerce regarding NLMK’s requests to be excluded from tariffs assessed on steel slabs imported into~~Steel, along with the ~~United States pursuant to the March 2018 Section 232 Presidential Order imposing tariffs. NLMK claims over $100 million in compensatory and~~ other ~~damages. The Company removed the claim to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on February 25, 2021. NLMK~~JSW Defendants, filed a Motion to ~~Remand~~Dismiss the ~~claim back to State court, which~~case on August 17, 2021. On February 17, 2022, the Court issued an opinion dismissing JSW’s antitrust complaint with prejudice. On March 16, 2022, JSW filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. JSW filed its appellate brief with the Fifth Circuit on June 8, 2022, and the JSW defendants response brief is ~~currently pending before the court.~~due on August 8, 2022. The Company is vigorously defending the matter.

On April 11, 2017, there was a process waste-water release at our Midwest Plant (Midwest) in Portage, Indiana, that impacted a water outfall that discharges to Burns Waterway near Lake Michigan. The Company has since implemented substantial operational, process and notification improvements at Midwest. In January of 2018, The Surfrider Foundation and the City of Chicago initiated suits in the Northern District of Indiana alleging ~~Clean Water Act (CWA)~~CWA and permit violations at Midwest. On April 2, 2018, the U.S. EPA and the State of Indiana initiated a separate action against the Company and lodged a Consent Decree negotiated between U. S. Steel and the relevant governmental agencies consisting of all material terms to resolve the CWA and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) violations at ~~the Midwest Plant.~~Midwest. A public comment period for the Consent Decree ensued. The suits that the Surfrider Foundation and the City of Chicago filed are currently stayed. The Surfrider Foundation and the City of Chicago also filed motions, which were granted, to intervene in the Consent Decree case. The United States Department of Justice ~~(DOJ)~~(the DOJ) filed a revised Consent Decree and a motion with the court to enter the Consent Decree as final on November 20, 2019. Surfrider Foundation, City of Chicago and other non-governmental organizations filed objections to the revised Consent Decree. The DOJ and U. S. Steel made filings in support of the revised Consent Decree. On August 31, 2021, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana issued an Opinion and Order entering the Consent Decree. The Company filed a Motion to Lift the Stay in the citizen suits as well as Motions to Dismiss the suits on December 15, 2021. On March ~~8, 2021,~~31, 2022, the Court granted Company’s Motion to Lift the ~~Company’s~~Stay in the citizen suits and the Motion to Dismiss the ~~Surfrider Foundation and City of Chicago Complaints in Intervention and granted leave to amend their respective Complaints.~~

~~On November 30, 2018,~~citizen suits remains pending. The Company is vigorously defending the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) issued a new Water Discharge Permit for the Minntac Tailings Basin waters. The permit contains new sulfate limitations applicable to water in the Tailings Basin and groundwater flowing from U. S. Steel’s property. The MPCA also acted on the same date, denying the Company’s requests for variances from ground and surface water standards and request for a contested case hearing. U. S. Steel filed appeals with the Minnesota Court of Appeals challenging the actions taken by the MPCA. Separate appeals were filed by a Minnesota Native American Tribe (Fond du Lac Band) and a nonprofit environmental group (Water Legacy). All cases were consolidated. On December 9, 2019, the Court issued a favorable ruling to U. S. Steel, removing the sulfate limitations for the Tailings Basin and groundwater. The opposing parties filed appeals with the Minnesota Supreme Court on January 8, 2020 which were accepted by that Court. On February 10, 2021 the Minnesota Supreme Court reversed the Court of Appeals’ decision regarding sulfate limitations and remanded the case for further proceedings, including a determination on the Company’s requests for variances. On June 28, 2021, the Court of Appeals issued a ruling denying the Company’s request for a variance from the sulfate standard for a contested case hearing.matter.

On October 2, 2017, an Amended Shareholder Class Action Complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania consolidating previously-filed actions. Separately, five related shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed in ~~State~~state and ~~Federal~~federal courts in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and the Delaware Court of Chancery. The underlying consolidated class action lawsuit alleges that U. S. Steel, certain current and former officers, an ~~upper level~~upper-level manager of the Company and the financial underwriters who participated in the August 2016 secondary public offering of the Company's common stock (collectively, ~~Defendants)~~the "Class Action Defendants") violated federal securities laws in making false statements and/or failing to discover and disclose material information regarding the financial condition of the Company. The lawsuit claims that this conduct caused a prospective class of plaintiffs to sustain damages during the period from January 27, 2016 to April 25, 2017 as a result of the prospective class purchasing the Company's common stock at artificially inflated prices and/or suffering losses when the price of the common stock dropped. The derivative lawsuits generally make the same allegations against the same officers and also

~~-41-~~

allege that certain current and former members of the Board of Directors failed to exercise appropriate control and oversight over the Company and were unjustly compensated. The plaintiffs seek to recover losses that were allegedly sustained. The ~~class action~~Class Action Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims. On September 29, 2018 the Court ruled on those motions granting them in part and denying them in part. On March 18, 2019, the plaintiffs withdrew the claims against the Class Action Defendants related to the 2016 secondary offering. As a result, the underwriters are no longer parties to the case. ~~The Company and the individual defendants are vigorously defending the remaining claims.~~ On December 31, 2019, the ~~Court~~court granted ~~Plaintiffs’~~the Plaintiffs' motion to certify the proceeding as a class action. The Company's appeal of that decision ~~has been denied~~was denied. Discovery followed and concluded. On May 20, 2022, the Plaintiffs and Class Action Defendants agreed to settle the Shareholder Class Action in the amount of $40 million to be fully funded by the ~~Third Circuit~~Company’s insurers. Court approval of ~~Appeals~~the class action settlement is currently pending. The related derivative cases, which were previously stayed, are now proceeding and the ~~class has been notified. Discovery is proceeding.~~Company will vigorously defend against the derivative lawsuits.

-39-

ENVIRONMENTAL PROCEEDINGS

The following is a summary of the proceedings of U. S. Steel that were pending or contemplated as of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, under federal and state environmental laws, and which U. S. Steel reasonably believes may result in monetary sanctions of at least $1 million (the threshold chosen by U. S. Steel as permitted by Item 103 of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Information about specific sites where U. S. Steel is or has been engaged in significant clean up or remediation activities is also summarized below. Except as described herein, it is not possible to accurately predict the ultimate outcome of these matters.

CERCLA Remediation Sites

Claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) have been raised with respect to the cleanup of various waste disposal and other sites. Under CERCLA, potentially responsible parties ~~(PRPs)~~(each, a PRP) for a site include current owners and operators, past owners and operators at the time of disposal, persons who arranged for disposal of a hazardous substance at a site and persons who transported a hazardous substance to a site. CERCLA imposes strict and joint and several liabilities. Because of various factors, including the ambiguity of the regulations, the difficulty of identifying the responsible parties for any particular site, the complexity of determining the relative liability among them, the uncertainty as to the most desirable remediation techniques, and the amount of damages and cleanup costs and the time period during which such costs may be incurred, we are unable to reasonably estimate U. S. Steel’s ultimate liabilities under CERCLA.

As of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, U. S. Steel has received information requests or been identified as a PRP at a total of four CERCLA sites, three of which have liabilities that have not been resolved. Based on currently available information, which is in many cases preliminary and incomplete, management believes that U. S. Steel’s liability for CERCLA cleanup and remediation costs at the other site will be over $5 million as described below.

Duluth Works

The former U. S. Steel Duluth Works site was placed on the National Priorities List under CERCLA in 1983 and on the State of Minnesota’s Superfund list in 1984. Liability for environmental remediation at the site is governed by a Response Order by Consent executed with the MPCA in 1985 and a Record of Decision signed by MPCA in 1989. U. S. Steel has partnered with the Great Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO) of the U.S. EPA Region 5 to address contaminated sediments in the St. Louis River Estuary and several other ~~Operable Units~~operable units that could impact the ~~Estuary~~estuary if not addressed. An amendment to the Project Agreement between U. S. Steel and GLNPO was executed during the second quarter of 2018 to recognize the initial costs associated with implementing the first two phases of the proposed remedial plan at the site.

Remediation contracts were issued by both USS and GLNPO for the first phase of the remedial work at the site during the fourth quarter of 2020. USS ~~has recently~~and GLNPO have contracted for the second phase of work at the site which ~~will extend~~extended through early 2022. ~~Work continues on refinement of the~~The final phase of the remedial design has been defined and ~~permitting. Additional,~~another amendment to the Project Agreement between U.S. Steel and GLNPO was executed in December 2021. USS' portion of additional, design, oversight costs, and implementation of ~~Phase 1 and Phase 2~~all three phases of the preferred remedial alternative on the upland property and Estuary are currently estimated as of June 30, ~~2021~~2022 at approximately ~~$33~~$40 million. Significant additional costs associated with this site are possible and are referenced in Note 21 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements “Contingencies and Commitments - Environmental Matters - Remediation Projects - Projects with Ongoing Study and Scope Development.”

Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA) and Other Remediation Sites

U. S. Steel may be liable for remediation costs under other environmental statutes, both federal and state, or where private parties are seeking to impose liability on U. S. Steel for remediation costs through discussions or litigation. There are nine such sites where remediation is being sought involving amounts in excess of $1 million. Based on currently available information, which is in many cases preliminary and incomplete, management believes that liability for cleanup and remediation costs in connection with five sites may involve remediation costs between $1 million and $5 million per site and four sites are estimated to, or could have, costs for remediation, investigation, restoration or compensation in excess of $5 million per site.

For more information on the status of remediation activities at U. S. Steel’s significant sites, see the discussions below.

Gary Works

~~-42-~~

On October 23, 1998, the U.S. EPA issued a final Administrative Order on Consent ~~(Order)~~ addressing Corrective Action for Solid Waste Management Units ~~(SWMU)~~(each, an SWMU and, collectively, the SWMUs) throughout Gary Works. This Order on Consent requires U. S. Steel to perform aan RCRA Facility Investigation (RFI), a Corrective Measures Study ~~(CMS)~~ and Corrective Measure Implementation. Evaluations are underway at six groundwater areas on the east side of the facility. An Interim Stabilization Measure work plan ~~has been~~was approved by the U.S. EPA for one of the six areas and a contractor has recently completed installation and startup of the remedial system. Until the remaining Phase I work and Phase II field investigations are completed, it is not possible to assess what additional expenditures will be necessary for Corrective Action projects at Gary Works. In total, the accrued liability for Corrective Action projects is approximately $24 million as of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, based on our current estimate of known remaining costs.

-40-

Geneva Works

At U. S. Steel’s former Geneva Works, liability for environmental remediation, including the closure of three hazardous waste impoundments and facility-wide corrective action, has been allocated between U. S. Steel and the current property owner pursuant to an agreement and a permit issued by the Utah Department of Environmental ~~Quality (UDEQ).~~Quality. Having completed the investigation on a majority of the remaining areas identified in the permit, U. S. Steel had determined the most effective means to address the remaining impacted material was to manage those materials in a previously approved on-site Corrective Action Management Unit ~~(CAMU)~~(the CAMU). U. S. Steel awarded a contract for the implementation of the CAMU ~~project~~ during the fourth quarter of 2018. Construction, waste stabilization and placement, along with closure of the CAMU, were substantially completed in the fourth quarter of 2020. Work at the site is now primarily focused on groundwater. U. S. Steel has an accrued liability of approximately $19 million as of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022 for our estimated share of the remaining costs of remediation at the site.

~~USS-POSCO Industries (UPI)~~USS-UPI LLC

In February 2020, U. S. Steel purchased the remaining 50 percent interest in ~~UPI,~~USS-POSCO Industries, a former joint venture that is located in Pittsburg, California between subsidiaries of U. S. Steel and ~~POSCO.~~POSCO, now known as USS-UPI, LLC. Prior to formation of the joint venture, UPI's facilities were previously owned and operated solely by U. S. Steel, which assumed responsibility for the existing environmental conditions. U. S. Steel continues to monitor the impacts of the remedial plan implemented in 2016 to address groundwater impacts from trichloroethylene at SWMU 4. Evaluations continue for the SWMUs, known as the Northern Boundary Group, and it is likely that corrective measures will be required, but it is not possible at this time to define a scope or estimate costs for what may be required by the California Department of Toxic Substances Control. As such, there has been no material change in the status of the project during the six months ended June 30, ~~2021.~~2022. As of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022, approximately $1 million has been accrued for ongoing environmental studies, investigations and remedy monitoring. Significant additional costs associated with this site are possible and are referenced in Note 21 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements “Contingencies and Commitments - Environmental Matters - Remediation Projects - Projects with Ongoing Study and Scope Development.” ~~See Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements "Acquisition" for further details regarding U. S. Steel's purchase of UPI.~~

In 2017, the Contra Costa Health Services Hazardous Materials Programs (County Health Services) conducted inspections of UPI’s facility, which resulted in the identification of several alleged environmental violations. Thereafter, UPI was able to resolve many of the issues to the satisfaction of County Health Services, but UPI also encountered some delays and disagreements pertaining to certain alleged violations. In 2018, County Health Services referred the matter to the Contra Costa District Attorney’s Office. In October 2019, UPI and the District Attorney’s Office agreed to a tentative settlement whereby UPI would pay $2.4 million in civil penalties in installments over 24 months. The tentative settlement also calls for UPI to spend $1 million on environmental compliance at its facility (expenditures that benefit UPI). In addition, the tentative settlement includes a $1 million suspended penalty that would be due if UPI were to fall out of compliance during the compliance period. The tentative settlement has been finalized and will be submitted for Court approval.

Fairfield Works

A consent decree was signed by U. S. Steel, the U.S EPA and the ~~U.S. Department of Justice~~DOJ and filed with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (United States of America v. USX Corporation) in December 1997. In accordance with the consent decree, U. S. Steel initiated aan RCRA corrective action program at the Fairfield Works facility. The Alabama Department of Environmental Management, with the approval of the U.S. EPA, assumed primary responsibility for regulation and oversight of the RCRA corrective action program at Fairfield Works. While work continues on different aspects of the program, there has been no material change in the status of the project during the six months ended June 30, ~~2021.~~2022. In total, the accrued liability for remaining work under the Corrective Action Program, was approximately ~~$118,000 at~~$210,000 as of June 30, ~~2021.~~2022. Significant additional costs associated with this site are possible and are referenced in Note 21 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements “Contingencies and Commitments - Environmental Matters - Remediation Projects - Projects with Ongoing Study and Scope Development.”

Cherryvale (KS) Zinc

In April 2003, U. S. Steel and Salomon Smith Barney Holdings, Inc. ~~(SSB)~~ entered into a Consent Order with the Kansas Department of Health & Environment (KDHE) concerning a former zinc smelting operation in Cherryvale, Kansas. Remediation of the site proper was essentially completed in 2007. The Consent Order was amended on May 3, 2013 to require investigation (but not remediation) of potential contamination beyond the boundary of the former zinc smelting operation. On November 22, 2016, KDHE approved a State Cooperative Final Agency Decision Statement that identified the remedy selected to address

~~-43-~~

potential contamination beyond the boundary of the former zinc smelting site. The Removal Action Design Plan was approved during the second quarter of 2018. The Waste Deposition Area design and the Interim Risk Management Plan (which includes institutional controls) were approved by KDHE during the fourth quarter of 2018. An amended consent order for remediation was signed in May 2019 and a remediation contract was executed in June 2019. Remediation work is now underway and is projected to continue through 2022. U. S. Steel has an accrued liability of approximately $4$2 million as of June 30, ~~2021,~~2022 for our estimated share of the cost of remediation.

Air Related Matters

Great Lakes Works

In June 2010, the U.S. EPA significantly lowered the primary ~~(NAAQS)~~NAAQS for SO2 from 140 ppb on a 24-hour basis to an hourly standard of 75 ppb. Based upon the 2009-2011 ambient air monitoring data, the U.S. EPA designated the area in which Great Lakes Works is located as nonattainment with the 2010 SO2 NAAQS.

As a result, pursuant to the CAA, the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy (EGLE) was required to submit aan SIP to the U.S. EPA that demonstrates that the entire nonattainment area (and not just the monitor) would be in attainment by October 2018 by using conservative air dispersion modeling. To develop the SIP, U. S. Steel met with EGLE on multiple occasions and had offered reduction plans to EGLE but the parties could not agree to a plan. EGLE instead promulgated

-41-

Rule 430, which was solely directed at U. S. Steel. The Company challenged Rule 430 before the Michigan Court of Claims, ~~who~~which by Order dated October 4, 2017 granted the Company’s motion for summary disposition voiding Rule 430 finding that it violated rule-making provisions of the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act and Michigan Constitution. Since Rule 430 has been invalidated and EGLE's SIP has not been approved, the U.S. EPA has indicated that it would promulgate a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) pursuant to its obligations and authority under the CAA. ~~Because development of the FIP is~~On January 28, 2022, U.S. EPA promulgated a final rule in the ~~early stages,~~Federal Register finding that the ~~impacts~~Detroit nonattainment area failed to attain the 2010 sulfur dioxide national ambient air quality standard. On February 15, 2022, the Northern District of California District Court entered a Consent Decree in Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. Michael S. Regan, that requires the ~~nonattainment designation~~EPA to promulgate a final FIP for the Detroit area no later than September 30, 2022. On June 1, 2022, EPA proposed a FIP for sulfur dioxide for the Detroit area. On July 18, 2022, U.

S. Steel provided comments to the ~~Company are not estimable at this time.~~EPA on the proposed FIP.

Granite City Works

In October 2015, Granite City Works received a Violation Notice from the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency ~~(IEPA)~~(the IEPA) in which the IEPA alleges that U. S. Steel violated the emission limits for nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds from the Basic Oxygen Furnace Electrostatic Precipitator Stack. In addition, the IEPA alleges that U. S. Steel exceeded its natural gas usage limit at its CoGeneration Boiler. U. S. Steel responded to the notice and is currently discussing resolution of the matter with IEPA.

Although discussions with IEPA regarding the foregoing alleged violations are ongoing and the resolution of these matters is uncertain at this time, it is not anticipated that the result of those discussions will be material to U. S. Steel.

Minnesota Ore Operations

On February 6, 2013, the U.S. EPA published aan FIP that applies to taconite facilities in Minnesota. ~~The~~An FIP establishes and requires emission limits and the use of low NOx reduction technology on indurating furnaces as Best Available Retrofit ~~Technology (BART).~~Technology. While U. S. Steel installed low NOx burners on three furnaces at Minntac and is currently obligated to install low NOx burners on the two other furnaces at Minntac pursuant to existing agreements and permits, the rule would require the installation of a low NOx burner on the one furnace at Keetac for which U. S. Steel did not have an otherwise existing obligation. U. S. Steel estimates expenditures associated with the installation of low NOx burners of as much as $25 million to $30 million. In 2013, U. S. Steel filed a petition for administrative reconsideration to the U.S. EPA and a petition for judicial review of the 2013 FIP and denial of the Minnesota SIP to the Eighth Circuit. In April 2016, the U.S. EPA promulgated a revised FIP with the same substantive requirements for U. S. Steel. In June 2016, U. S. Steel filed a petition for administrative reconsideration of the 2016 FIP to the U.S. EPA and a petition for judicial review of the 2016 FIP before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. While the proceedings regarding the petition for judicial review of the 2013 FIP remained stayed, oral arguments regarding the petition for judicial review of the 2016 FIP were heard by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals on November 15, 2017. Thus, both petitions for judicial review remain with the Eighth Circuit. On December 4, 2017, the U.S. EPA published a notification in the Federal Register in which the U.S. EPA denied U. S. Steel’s administrative petitions for reconsideration and stay of the 2013 FIP and 2016 FIP. On February 1, 2018, U. S. Steel filed a petition for judicial review of the U.S. EPA’s denial of the administrative petitions for reconsideration to the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. The U.S. EPA and U. S. Steel reached a settlement regarding the five indurating lines at Minntac. After proposing a revised FIP and responding to public comments, on March 2, 2021, the U.S. EPA promulgated a final revised FIP incorporating the conditions and limits for Minntac to which the parties agreed. U. S. Steel and the U.S. EPA continue to negotiate resolution for Keetac.

Mon Valley Works

On November 9, 2017, the U.S. EPA Region III and ~~the Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD)~~ACHD jointly issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) regarding the Company’s Edgar Thomson facility in Braddock, ~~PA.~~Pennsylvania. In addition, on November 20, 2017, ACHD issued a separate, but related, NOV to the Company regarding the Edgar Thomson facility. In the NOVs, based upon their inspections and review of documents collected throughout the last two years, the agencies allege that the Company has violated

~~-44-~~

the CAA by exceeding the allowable visible emission standards from certain operations during isolated events. In addition, the agencies allege that the Company has violated certain maintenance, reporting, and recordkeeping requirements. U. S. Steel met with the U.S. EPA Region III and ACHD several times. ACHD, the U.S. EPA Region III and U. S. Steel continue to negotiate a potential resolution of the matter.

On December 24, 2018, U. S. Steel's Clairton Plant experienced a fire, affecting portions of the facility involved in desulfurization of the coke oven gas generated during the coking process. With the desulfurization process out of operation as a result of the fire, U. S. Steel was not able to certify compliance with Clairton Plant’s Title V permit levels for sulfur emissions. U. S. Steel promptly notified ACHD, which has regulatory jurisdiction for the Title V permit, and updated the ACHD regularly on efforts to mitigate any potential environmental impacts until the desulfurization process was returned to normal operations. Of the approximately 2,400 hours between the date of the fire and April 4, 2019, when the Company resumed desulfurization, there were ten intermittent hours where average SO2 emissions exceeded the hourly NAAQS for SO2 at the Allegheny County regional air quality monitors located in Liberty and North Braddock boroughs, which are near U. S. Steel's Mon Valley Works facilities. On February 13, 2019, PennEnvironment and Clean Air Council, both environmental, non-governmental organizations, sent U. S. Steel a 60-day notice of intent to sue letter pursuant to the CAA. The letter alleged Title V permit violations at the Clairton, Irvin, and Edgar Thomson facilities as a result of the December 24, 2018 Clairton Plant fire. The 60-day notice letter also alleged that the violations caused adverse public health and welfare impacts to the communities surrounding the Clairton, Irvin, and

-42-

Edgar Thomson facilities. PennEnvironment and Clean Air Council subsequently filed a Complaint in Federal Court in the Western District of Pennsylvania on April 29, 2019 to which U. S. Steel has responded. On May 3, 2019, ACHD filed a motion to intervene in the lawsuit which was granted by the Court. On June 25, 2019, ACHD filed its Complaint in Intervention, seeking injunctive relief and civil penalties regarding the alleged Permit violations following the December 24, 2018 fire. Fact and Expert discovery has been completed, and pre-trial motion briefing has been submitted to the court. The ~~parties~~court heard oral arguments on the motions including the Plaintiffs’ Motions for Summary Judgment and on March 31, 2022, the Court denied all pre-trial motions. The Company will continue to vigorously defend against the matter.

On March 2, 2022, the Company received a stipulated penalty demand for $859,300 from the Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) pursuant to the June 2019 Settlement Agreement and Order (SAO) between the Company and ACHD. In the demand notice, ACHD alleges that based upon daily visible emission observation inspections occurring April 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021, the Company’s Clairton plant violated applicable opacity standards from coke battery fugitive emission sources. The Company disagrees with the bases for the demand. The Company has initiated dispute resolution in accordance with the SAO and is attempting to reach a negotiated resolution of the matter.

On March 7, 2022, the Company received an enforcement order from the Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) that includes a civil penalty demand for $1,842,539. In the Order, the ACHD alleges that the Company’s Clairton plant is solely and entirely culpable for 153 alleged exceedances of the Pennsylvania hydrogen sulfide ambient air standard that are ~~currently engaged in discovery.~~reported to have occurred during January 1, 2020 through March 1, 2022. The Company disagrees with the bases for the demand. On April 5, 2022, the Company appealed the Order and is vigorously defending the matter.

On March 24, 2022, the Company received an enforcement order from the Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) that includes a civil penalty demand for $4,570,500 for alleged air permit violations occurring between January 1, 2020 through March 15, 2022 regarding the Company’s Clairton plant’s coke oven pushing emission control systems. The Company disagrees with the bases for the demand and has appealed the Order.

Water Related Matters

On April 11, 2017, there was a process waste-water release at our Midwest Plant (Midwest) in Portage, Indiana, that impacted a water outfall that discharges to Burns Waterway near Lake Michigan. The Company has since implemented substantial operational, process and notification improvements at Midwest. On April 2, 2018, the U.S. EPA and the State of Indiana initiated an action and lodged a Consent Decree negotiated between U. S. Steel and the relevant governmental agencies consisting of all material terms to resolve the CWA and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) violations at the Midwest Plant. While the Consent Decree was being negotiated, in January of 2018, The Surfrider Foundation and the City of Chicago initiated citizen suits in the Northern District of Indiana alleging Clean Water Act (CWA) and permit violations at Midwest. The citizen suits were stayed pending resolution and entry of the Consent Decree, and both the Surfriders Foundation and the City of Chicago intervened in the Consent Decree action. On August 31, 2021, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana issued an Opinion and Order entering the Consent Decree. The Company filed a Motion to Lift the Stay in the citizen suits as well as Motions to Dismiss the citizen suits on December 15, 2021. On March 31, 2022, the Court granted Company’s Motion to Lift the Stay in the citizen suits and the Motion to Dismiss the citizen suits remains pending. The Company is vigorously defending the matter.

On February 7, 2020, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) issued an Amended Notice of Violation and Proposed Agreed Order related to alleged NPDES permit water discharge violations at ~~our~~ Midwest ~~Plant (Midwest) in Portage, Indiana~~ during the period of November 2018 through December 2019 unrelated to the violations resolved in the Consent Decree. ~~The Proposed~~On May 11, 2021, IDEM and U. S. Steel entered into an Agreed Order ~~seeks~~where U. S. Steel agreed to taking corrective actions, a civil penalty, a Supplemental Environmental Project, and stipulated penalties for future violations. ~~The parties continue to negotiate a Proposed Agreed Order.~~

ASBESTOS LITIGATION

See Note 21 to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, Contingencies and Commitments for a description of our asbestos litigation.


Item 1A.			RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes or updates to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2020.~~2021.

-43-


Item 2.			PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

~~None.~~Share repurchase activity under the Company's share repurchase program during the three months ended June 30, 2022 was as follows:


Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs in effect at June 30, 2022 (a)
April 1 - 30, 2022	658,215	$	33.143	658,215	$	505,705,900
May 1 - 31, 2022	412,200	$	30.823	412,200	$	493,000,700
June 1 - 30, 2022	16,411,186	$	22.241	16,411,186	$	128,000,700
Quarter ended June 30, 2022	17,481,601	$	22.854	17,481,601	$	128,000,700

(a) On October 25, 2021, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program to repurchase up to $300 million of our outstanding common stock at the discretion of management. On January 24, 2022 the Board of Directors authorized an additional $500 million under the share repurchase program. On July 25, 2022, following the completion of the previously authorized $800 million share repurchase programs, the Board of Directors authorized a new share repurchase program that allows for the repurchase of up to $500 million of its outstanding common stock. The Company’s share repurchase program does not obligate it to acquire any specific number of shares. Under this program, the shares will be purchased from time to time at prevailing market prices, through open market or privately negotiated transactions, depending upon market conditions.


Item 3.			DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.


Item 4.			MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

The information concerning mine safety violations and other regulatory matters required by Section 150 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K is included in Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-Q.


Item 5.			OTHER INFORMATION

None.

~~-45-~~-44-


Item 6.			EXHIBITS


3.1						Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of United States Steel Corporation, dated April 25, 2017. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to United States Steel Corporation’s Form 8-K filed on April 28, 2017, Commission File Number 1-16811.)

3.2						Amended and Restated By-Laws of United States Steel Corporation, as of ~~July 28, 2020.~~October 26, 2021. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to United States Steel Corporation’s Form 8-K filed on ~~July 30, 2020,~~October 28, 2021, Commission File Number 1-16811.)

10.1						~~Amended and Restated Senior Multicurrency Revolving Credit Facility Agreement Dated 26 September 2018 as Amended and Restated on the Second Effective Date.~~

~~10.2~~						Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated June 7, 2021, by and between United States Steel Corporation and Percy Acquisition LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to United States Steel Corporation’s Form 8-K filed on June 8, 2021, Commission File Number 1-~~16811~~.)*

~~10.3~~						~~Amendment No. 3 to Fifth~~Sixth Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated ~~July 23, 2021, by and~~as of May 27, 2022, among United States Steel Corporation, the Subsidiary Guarantors from time to time party thereto, the Lenders party thereto, the LC Issuing Banks party thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative and Collateral ~~Agent~~Agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to United States Steel Corporation’s Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2022. Commission File Number 1-16811.)*

10.2						.Third Amended and Restated Borrower Security Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2022, between United States Steel Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Collateral Agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to United States Steel Corporation’s Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2022. Commission File Number 1-16811.)

10.3						Third Amended and Restated Subsidiary Security Agreement, dated as of May 27, 2022, between the Subsidiary Guarantors and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Collateral Agent. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to United States Steel Corporation’s Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2022. Commission File Number 1-16811.)

10.4						Second ~~Amendment to ABL Credit~~Amended and Restated Borrower Canadian Security Agreement, dated ~~July 23, 2021,~~as of May 27, 2022, between United States Steel Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Collateral Agent. (Incorporated by ~~and among Big River~~reference to Exhibit 10.4 to United States Steel ~~LLC, BRS Intermediate Holdings LLC, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, as administrative agent and collateral agent, and each lender party thereto~~.Corporation’s Form 8-K filed on June 3, 2022. Commission File Number 1-16811.)

~~31.1~~10.5						Form of Offer Letter to Jessica T. Graziano, dated June 6, 2022.**

31.1						Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2						Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1						Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2						Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

95						Mine Safety Disclosure required under Section 1503 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

101						The following financial information from United States Steel Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2021~~2022 formatted in Inline XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) includes: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

104						Cover Page Interactive Data File - (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).

* Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(10)(iv) of Regulation S-K. The Company hereby undertakes to furnish supplemental copies of the omitted schedules and exhibits upon request by the U.S. Securities and Exchange ~~Commission~~.Commission.

** Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

~~-46-~~-45-

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned chief accounting officer thereunto duly authorized.


UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION


By						/s/ Manpreet S. Grewal

						Manpreet S. Grewal
						Vice President, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer

July ~~30, 2021~~29, 2022

WEB SITE POSTING

This Form 10-Q will be posted on the U. S. Steel web site, www.ussteel.com, within a few days of its filing.

~~-47-~~-46-


Six Months Ended June 30, 2020	Flat-Rolled		USSE		Tubular		Other		Total
Semi-finished	$	58	$	2	$	0	$	0	$	60
Hot-rolled sheets	741		351		0		0		1,092
Cold-rolled sheets	940		71		0		0		1,011
Coated sheets	1,424		431		0		0		1,855
Tubular products	0		20		429		0		449
All Other (a)	308		33		8		23		372
Total	$	3,471	$	908	$	437	$	23	$	4,839
(a) Consists primarily of sales of raw materials and coke making by-products.


Year	Redemption Price
2024	103.438	%
2025	101.719	%
2026 and thereafter	100.000	%


Period ended	Opening Number of Claims	Claims Dismissed, Settled and Resolved (a)	New Claims	Closing Number of Claims
December 31, 2018	3,315	1,285	290	2,320
December 31, 2019	2,320	195	265	2,390
December 31, 2020	2,390	240	295	2,445
June 30, 2021	2,445	75	155	2,525


Remainder of 2021	2022	2023	2024	2025	Later Years	Total
$616	$1,136	$464	$227	$204	$842	$3,489