UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_________________________________________

FORM 10-Q

_________________________________________

(Mark One)



ý☒	QUARTERLYREPORTPURSUANTTO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHESECURITIESEXCHANGEACTOF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2017~~2019



¨☐	TRANSITIONREPORTPURSUANTTOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OFTHESECURITIESEXCHANGEACTOF 1934

Commission File Number 001-31225

_________________________________________

ENPRO INDUSTRIES, ~~INC.~~INC.

(Exact name of registrant, as specified in its charter)

_____________________________________



North Carolina		01-0573945
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
5605 Carnegie Boulevard
Suite 500
Charlotte
North Carolina		28209
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

~~(704)~~ (704) 731-1500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

~~__________________________________________~~Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, $0.01 par value	NPO	New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). YesýNo¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	ý☒	Accelerated filer	¨☐
Non-accelerated filer	¨ ~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~ ☐	Smaller reporting company	¨☐
		Emerging growth company	¨☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨☐No ý

As of ~~October 30, 2017,~~November 4, 2019, there were ~~21,325,716~~20,783,987 shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding, which does not include ~~191,838~~186,516 shares of common stock held by a subsidiary of the registrant and accordingly are not entitled to be voted. There is only one class of common stock.

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.	Financial Statements

ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

Quarters and Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018

(in millions, except per share amounts)


	Quarters Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Quarters Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2019			2018			2019			2018
Net sales	$	343.7		$	292.7		$	947.1		$	900.8		$	373.0		$	388.2		$	1,120.3		$	1,150.6
Cost of sales	228.5			194.1			625.8			596.7			258.0			264.1			767.1			785.6
Gross profit	115.2			98.6			321.3			304.1			115.0			124.1			353.2			365.0
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	85.7			70.9			232.7			231.7			84.1			78.9			255.7			260.4
Asbestos settlement	—			—			—			80.0
Other	11.0			2.4			15.4			10.4			2.3			1.0			4.7			6.3
Total operating expenses	96.7			73.3			248.1			322.1			86.4			79.9			260.4			266.7
Operating income (loss)	18.5			25.3			73.2			(18.0		)
Operating income													28.6			44.2			92.8			98.3
Interest expense	(11.2		)	(14.3		)	(42.2		)	(41.7		)	(4.1		)	(6.1		)	(13.8		)	(21.6		)
Interest income	0.9			0.3			1.0			0.7			0.3			0.2			1.3			0.8
Gain on reconsolidation of GST and OldCo	534.4			—			534.4			—
Other expense	(1.9		)	(1.3		)	(5.1		)	(5.4		)	(24.6		)	(13.8		)	(27.3		)	(14.4		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	540.7			10.0			561.3			(64.4		)
Income tax benefit (expense)	(50.5		)	(4.0		)	(55.7		)	27.2
Income before income taxes													0.2			24.5			53.0			63.1
Income tax expense													(1.7		)	(0.3		)	(17.5		)	(16.4		)
Net income (loss)	$	490.2		$	6.0		$	505.6		$	(37.2	)	$	(1.5	)	$	24.2		$	35.5		$	46.7
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	494.9		$	6.6		$	525.7		$	(38.6	)
Comprehensive income													$	3.7		$	36.0		$	44.9		$	58.4

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	22.98		$	0.28		$	23.68		$	(1.71	)	$	(0.08	)	$	1.17		$	1.71		$	2.22
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	22.49		$	0.28		$	23.32		$	(1.71	)	$	(0.08	)	$	1.16		$	1.71		$	2.20
Cash dividends per share	$	0.22		$	0.21		$	0.66		$	0.63		$	0.25		$	0.24		$	0.75		$	0.72

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

Nine Months Ended September 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018

(in millions)


	2017			2016			2019			2018
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)	$	505.6		$	(37.2	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net income							$	35.5		$	46.7
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	23.5			22.8			27.9			28.3
Amortization	21.8			19.9			25.7			26.3
Intangible asset impairment	10.1			—
Gain on reconsolidation of GST and OldCo	(534.4		)	—
Asbestos settlement	—			80.0
Deferred income taxes	42.6			(38.7		)	(4.2		)	(4.4		)
Stock-based compensation	5.2			4.8			5.0			4.8
Other non-cash adjustments	3.3			0.8			14.8			14.3
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisition, deconsolidation and reconsolidation of businesses:
Asbestos liabilities	(16.7		)	—
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestiture of businesses:
Asbestos insurance receivables	26.6			—			5.8			16.8
Accounts receivable, net	(22.8		)	(8.3		)	7.2			(31.3		)
Inventories	0.6			2.0			(0.6		)	(31.7		)
Accounts payable	5.1			(17.4		)	(26.5		)	6.6
Other current assets and liabilities	0.5			(4.7		)	45.6			96.5
Other non-current assets and liabilities	(6.6		)	(16.1		)	14.5			(14.5		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	64.4			7.9			150.7			158.4
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(23.6		)	(24.6		)	(23.8		)	(45.7		)
Payments for capitalized internal-use software	(2.6		)	(3.1		)
Payments for acquisitions	(39.5		)	(28.5		)
Reconsolidation of GST and OldCo	41.1			—
Deconsolidation of OldCo	(4.8		)	—
Capital contribution to OldCo	(45.2		)	—
Proceeds from sale of business							3.6			—
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired							(310.4		)	—
Receipts from settlements of derivative contracts							—			9.3
Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment							0.8			26.6
Other	0.4			3.7			(2.9		)	(2.0		)
Net cash used in investing activities	(74.2		)	(52.5		)	(332.7		)	(11.8		)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from debt	503.0			303.3			566.9			454.9
Repayments of debt	(409.3		)	(192.7		)	(365.1		)	(594.4		)
Repurchase of common stock	(11.5		)	(26.2		)	(15.0		)	(50.0		)
Dividends paid	(14.3		)	(13.6		)	(15.7		)	(15.3		)
Other	(2.5		)	(3.1		)	(5.0		)	(6.7		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	65.4			67.7
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities							166.1			(211.5		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	9.0			(11.7		)	(1.6		)	(4.5		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	64.6			11.4
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents							(17.5		)	(69.4		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	111.5			103.4			129.6			189.3
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	176.1		$	114.8		$	112.1		$	119.9
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	44.8		$	39.7
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest, net							$	7.9		$	28.1
Income taxes, net	$	8.9		$	26.8		$	3.1		$	(81.7	)
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Non-cash acquisitions of property, plant, and equipment	$	4.9		$	4.8		$	1.7		$	5.0

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(in millions, except share amounts)


	September 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			September 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	176.1		$	111.5		$	112.1		$	129.6
Accounts receivable, net	247.7			208.1			287.1			286.6
Inventories	210.8			175.4			225.5			233.1
Income tax receivable							38.5			49.6
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	71.4			29.9			34.4			33.2
Total current assets	706.0			524.9			697.6			732.1
Property, plant and equipment, net	284.2			215.4			284.9			301.2
Goodwill	344.7			201.5			485.0			333.7
Other intangible assets, net	353.3			176.9			494.3			297.3
Investment in GST	—			236.9
Deferred income taxes and income tax receivable	88.8			152.6
Other assets	65.4			38.2			107.9			51.5
Total assets	$	1,842.4		$	1,546.4		$	2,069.7		$	1,715.8
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities
Short-term borrowings from GST	$	—		$	26.2
Notes payable to GST	—			12.7
Current maturities of long-term debt	0.2			0.2			$	0.4		$	2.4
Accounts payable	111.8			102.9			105.6			139.2
Asbestos liability	80.0			30.0
Accrued expenses	119.7			131.0			200.8			150.4
Total current liabilities	311.7			303.0			306.8			292.0
Long-term debt	560.4			424.8			665.9			462.5
Notes payable to GST	—			283.2
Asbestos liability	—			80.0
Deferred taxes							80.4			37.6
Other liabilities	103.8			96.9			112.2			66.0
Total liabilities	975.9			1,187.9			1,165.3			858.1
Commitments and contingencies
Redeemable non-controlling interest							28.0			—
Shareholders’ equity
Common stock – $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; issued, 21,517,554 shares in 2017 and 21,558,145 shares in 2016	0.2			0.2
Common stock – $.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; issued, 20,782,637 shares in 2019 and 20,929,218 shares in 2018							0.2			0.2
Additional paid-in capital	343.4			346.5			290.5			301.0
Retained earnings	575.0			84.0			634.6			603.3
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(50.8		)	(70.9		)	(47.6		)	(45.5		)
Common stock held in treasury, at cost – 192,418 shares in 2017 and 194,073 shares in 2016	(1.3		)	(1.3		)
Common stock held in treasury, at cost – 187,245 shares in 2019 and 189,514 shares in 2018							(1.3		)	(1.3		)
Total shareholders’ equity	866.5			358.5			876.4			857.7
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,842.4		$	1,546.4		$	2,069.7		$	1,715.8

See notes to consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)


1.	Overview, Basis of Presentation and Recently Issued Authoritative Accounting Guidance

Overview

EnPro Industries, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “EnPro” or the “Company”) is a leader in the design, development, manufacture, and marketing of proprietary engineered industrial products that primarily include: sealing products; heavy-duty truck wheel-end component systems; self-lubricating non-rolling bearing products; precision engineered components and lubrication systems for reciprocating compressors; hoses and fittings for the hygienic process industries; bellows and bellow assemblies; pedestals for semiconductor manufacturing; PTFE products; and heavy-duty, medium-speed diesel, natural gas and dual fuel reciprocating engines, including parts and services.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited, and certain related information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been omitted in accordance with Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. They were prepared following the same policies and procedures used in the preparation of our annual financial statements except as disclosed below and reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of results for the periods presented. The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, ~~2016~~2018 was derived from the audited financial statements included in our annual report on Form ~~10-K~~10-K/A for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2018. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for the fiscal year. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our annual consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2018 included within our annual report on Form ~~10-K.~~10-K/A.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amount of assets and liabilities and the disclosures regarding contingent assets and liabilities at period end and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

All intercompany accounts and transactions between our consolidated operations have been eliminated.

In the first quarter of ~~2017,~~2019, we adopted a standard that ~~was issued~~establishes principles to ~~modify~~report transparent and ~~simplify several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions. Changes~~economically neutral information about the assets and liabilities that arise from leases. The standard requires lessees to recognize the ~~previous guidance primarily pertain to the income tax consequences of share-based payment transactions. Under the standard,~~lease assets and lease liabilities that arise from all ~~excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies (including tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards) are recognized as income tax expense or benefit~~leases in the ~~income~~ statement ~~beginning~~of financial position and to disclose qualitative and quantitative information about lease transactions, such as information about variable lease payments and options to renew and terminate leases. The standard retains a distinction between finance leases and operating leases. As a result, the effect of leases in ~~2017. This adoption is made prospectively. Excess tax benefits/deficiencies recorded in income tax expense for~~ the ~~quarter~~Consolidated Statements of Operations and ~~nine months ended September 30, 2017 were insignificant.~~

~~We historically accounted for excess tax benefits on~~ the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows asis largely unchanged. Additionally, the guidance provides clarification on the definition of a ~~financing activity.~~ lease, including alignment of the concept of control of an asset with principles in other authoritative guidance around revenue recognition and consolidation. We adopted the new standard using the allowable option to apply the transition provisions of the new guidance at its adoption date without adjusting the comparative periods presented.

We evaluated the impact of applying practical expedients, and upon adoption we elected the package of practical expedients which permits us to not reassess prior conclusions related to contracts containing leases, lease classification, and initial direct costs. Additionally, we elected to not separate lease and non-lease components, we will not recognize an asset for leases with a term of twelve months or less, and we will apply a portfolio approach in determining discount rates.

Upon adoption of this standard, ~~excess tax benefits are classified along with other income tax cash flows as an~~we recognized a right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability of approximately $30 million for our operating ~~activity. We elected to adopt this portion~~leases. The adoption of the standard ondid not have a ~~prospective basis.~~material impact to our Consolidated Statements of Operations or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Additionally, ~~with respect~~in the first quarter of 2019, we adopted a standard that allows for the reclassification of disproportionate income tax effects ("stranded tax effects") resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act") from accumulated other comprehensive loss to forfeitures of awards, we made the accounting policy election under the standard to account for forfeitures when they occur as opposed to estimating the number of awards that are expected to vest as of the grant date. This election was adopted under a modified retrospective transition method by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of 2017.retained earnings. As a result of ~~this transition,~~the Tax Act, we remeasured our deferred taxes related to pensions and other postretirement benefits using the new U.S. federal tax rate. Our adoption of the standard resulted in the reclassification of a ~~$0.3~~net tax benefit of $11.5 million ~~reduction was recorded~~from accumulated other comprehensive loss to ~~the 2017~~ opening retained earnings ~~for this effect.~~in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Adoption of the standard had no impact to our Consolidated Statements of Operations or Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Recently Issued Authoritative Accounting Guidance

In March 2017, a standard was issued that requires an employer to report the service cost component of pension and other postretirement benefits expense in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations. The amendments in this standard also allow only the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable (for example, as a cost of internally manufactured inventory or a self-constructed asset). The standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods, and is to be applied retrospectively for the classification of pension costs on the income statement and prospectively for the criteria on capitalization of certain costs. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the application of this guidance would have resulted in an increase in operating income of approximately $1.6 million with a corresponding increase in non-operating expenses. For the nine months ended

~~September 30, 2017, the application of this guidance would have resulted in an increase in operating income of approximately $0.4 million with a corresponding increase in non-operating expenses.~~

In January 2017, a standard was issued to simplify annual and interim goodwill impairment testing for public business entities. Under the standard, an entity should perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. The standard is effective for any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and is to be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The standard is not currently expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

In January 2017, a standard was issued to clarify the definition of a business in determining whether a purchase of an asset or group of assets is to be accounted for as a purchase of a business and thus subject to authoritative guidance on business combinations. The standard narrows the current definition of a business, stating that to be considered a business, an asset or group of assets must include an input and a substantive process that create outputs. An input is an economic resource, such as intellectual property or employees, used to create the goods or services that are considered outputs. The guidance is effective for fiscal years that begin after December 15, 2017 and is to be applied prospectively. This standard is not expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

In August 2016, a standard was issued to eliminate diversity in practice in the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments within the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The guidance requires application through a retrospective transition method. This standard is not expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

In June 2016, a standard was issued that significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income, including trade receivables. The standard requires an entity to estimate its lifetime “expected credit loss” for such assets at inception, and record an allowance that, when deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset, presents the net amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods therein. We are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it will have on our consolidated financial statements.

~~In February 2016, a standard was issued to establish principles to report transparent~~ Based upon our current population of receivables and economically neutral information about the assets and liabilities that arise from leases. The standard will require lessees to recognize the lease assets and lease liabilities that arise from all leases in the statement of financial position and to disclose qualitative and quantitative information about lease transactions, such as information about variable lease payments and options to renew and terminate leases. The standard retains a distinction between finance leases and operating leases. As a result, the effect of leases in the statement of operations and the statement of cash flows is largely unchanged. Additionally, the guidance provides clarification on the definition of a lease, including alignment of the concept of control of an asset with principles in other authoritative guidance around revenue recognition and consolidation. The amendments in this guidance are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the new guidance to determine the impact it will have on our consolidated financial statements. Whileassociated historical credit loss experience, we do not ~~currently~~ expect that ~~adoption of the~~this standard will have a material impact to our Consolidated Statements of Operations, Comprehensive Income, or Cash Flows, the addition of lease assets and liabilities to our Consolidated Balance Sheets for leases currently accounted for as operating leases will increase both total assets and liabilities. At December 31, 2016, future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases were $45.5 million. The amount of increase will depend on the magnitude of our population of operating lease commitments at the time of adoption, which could change significantly from our current commitments due to factors including future lease versus buy decisions, acquisitions, and dispositions. At December 31, 2016, lease commitments of GST and OldCo, which were reconsolidated in the current quarter, were $3.9 million.

In January 2016, a standard was issued that amends existing guidance around classification and measurement of certain financial assets and liabilities. Changes to the current GAAP model primarily affect the accounting for equity investments, financial liabilities under the fair value option, and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. Under the new guidance, all equity investments in unconsolidated entities (other than those accounted for using

the equity method of accounting) will generally be measured at fair value through earnings. For equity investments without readily determinable fair values, the cost method is also eliminated. However, most entities will be able to elect to record equity investments without readily determinable fair values at cost, less impairment, and plus or minus subsequent adjustments for observable price changes. The standard also requires that financial assets and liabilities be disclosed separately in the notes to the financial statements based on measurement principle and form of financial asset. The amendments in this guidance are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. This standard is not expected to have a significant impact on our consolidated financial ~~statements or disclosures.~~

In May 2014, a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard was issued that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance. The new guidance introduces a five-step model in which an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects tostatements. This conclusion could be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance also requires disclosures sufficient to enable users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers, including qualitative and quantitative disclosures about contracts with customers,impacted by any significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. The new standard will become effective for us beginning with the first quarter 2018. We are currently evaluating the new guidance.

The guidance has the potential to affect certain aspects of our current practice of accounting for engine contracts in our Power Systems segment. We expect that our long-term contracts will continue to recognize revenue and earnings over time as the work progresses because of the continuous transfer of control to the customer, generally using an input measure (e.g., costs incurred) to reflect progress. Our current practice of accounting for such contracts as single profit centers under existing guidance could change in instances where such contracts are determined to have multiple performance obligations that are distinct within the context of the contract under the new standard. Identifying multiple performance obligations in a contract currently accounted for as a single profit center could make the rate at which we recognize revenue and margins under that contract faster or slower, depending on the contract. Additionally, we have certain service contracts where revenue is currently recognized using a milestone method. Under the new guidance, revenue on such contracts will likely be recognized more frequently throughout the contract using an input measure.

We plan to adopt the guidance using the modified retrospective transition alternative provided in the standard, meaning that contracts open during the transition period that will continue beyond the effective date are evaluated for impact in transition to the new guidance. Based upon review of our current contract portfolio, we do not expect the transition impact of adopting the new guidance will be material to EnPro. Many of the affected service contracts mentioned above are over relatively short periods of time and not for large amounts of consideration, and we currently have only a single engine contractfuture financing arrangements that we ~~have determined~~may choose to ~~have multiple performance obligations that are distinct within the context of the contract. However, to the extent we~~ enter ~~new contracts that fit the above criteria in the future, the standard's impact on the timing of our revenue recognition could be more significant.~~with customers.


2.	~~Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC, Garrison Litigation Management Group, Ltd.,~~Acquisitions and ~~OldCo, LLC~~Divestiture

Acquisitions

On September 25, 2019, we acquired all of the equity securities of LeanTeq Co., Ltd. and its affiliate LeanTeq LLC (collectively referred to as “LeanTeq”). LeanTeq primarily provides refurbishment services for critical components and assemblies used in state-of-the-art semiconductor equipment. This equipment is used to produce the latest and most technologically advanced microchips for smartphones, autonomous vehicles, high-speed wireless connectivity, artificial intelligence, and other leading-edge applications. Founded in 2011 and headquartered in Taoyuan City, Taiwan, LeanTeq has 2 locations in Taiwan and 1 in the United States (Silicon Valley). LeanTeq is included as part of our Technetics Group within the Sealing Products segment.

The ~~historical business operations~~acquisition was paid for with $271.2 million in cash, net of ~~Garlock Sealing Technologies~~cash acquired, plus rollover equity from 2 of LeanTeq sellers (the “Sellers”) who were executives of the acquired entity. This rollover equity gives the Sellers approximately a 10% ownership share (the "Rollover Equity") of Lunar Investment LLC (“~~GST LLC”~~Lunar”), EnPro’s subsidiary that purchased LeanTeq. Additionally, there were approximately $5.6 million and $6.4 million of acquisition-related costs recorded during the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively, which were expensed during the periods and included in selling, general and administrative expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.

On July 2, 2019, we acquired 100% of the stock of The Anchor Packing Company (“Anchor”) resulted in a substantial volume of asbestos litigation in which plaintiffs alleged personal injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos fibers. Those subsidiaries manufactured and/or sold industrial sealing products, predominately gasketsAseptic Group (comprising Aseptic Process Equipment SAS and packing, that contained encapsulated asbestos fibers. Anchor was an inactive and insolvent indirect subsidiary of EnPro's then-direct subsidiary, Coltec Industries Inc ("Coltec"). Our subsidiaries’ exposure to asbestos litigation and their relationships with insurance carriers had been managed through another subsidiary, Garrison Litigation Management Group, Ltd. (“Garrison”). GST LLC, Anchor and Garrison areAseptic Services SARL, collectively referred to as ~~“GST.”~~

~~On June 5, 2010 (the "GST Petition Date"~~“Aseptic”), ~~GST LLC, Anchor~~a privately-held company which distributes, designs and ~~Garrison filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "GST Chapter 11 Case") in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court~~manufactures aseptic fluid transfer products for the ~~Western District of North Carolina (the "Bankruptcy Court"). The filings were the initial step~~pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industries. Aseptic, headquartered in a claims resolution process for an efficient and permanent resolution of all pending and future asbestos claims through court approval of a plan of reorganization to establish a facility to resolve and pay all GST asbestos claims. On March 17, 2016, we announced that we had reached a comprehensive consensual settlement to resolve current and future asbestos claims which contemplated the joint plan of reorganization (the "Joint Plan") which was filed with the Bankruptcy Court. This settlement contemplated that Coltec would, subject to the receipt of necessary consents, undergo a corporate restructuring (the “Coltec Restructuring”) in which all of its significant operating assets and subsidiaries, whichLimonest, France, is included each of the Company’s major business units, would be distributed to a new direct subsidiary of the Company, which would also assume all of Coltec’s non-asbestos liabilities. The Coltec Restructuring was completed on December 31, 2016, and included the merger of Coltec with and into OldCo, LLC (“OldCo”), an indirect subsidiary of EnPro. As further contemplated by the settlement, on January 30, 2017 (the "OldCo Petition Date"), OldCo filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition with the Bankruptcy Court (the "OldCo Chapter 11 Case"). On

February 3, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order for the joint administration of the OldCo Chapter 11 Case with the GST Chapter 11 Case. The Joint Plan was consummated on July 31, 2017. For more detail on the terms of the Joint Plan, see Note 17 - "Commitments and Contingencies - Asbestos - Joint Plan of Reorganization."

During the pendency of the GST Chapter 11 Case and the related OldCo Chapter 11 Case, which are described further in Note 17 – "Commitments and Contingencies – Asbestos," certain actions proposed to be taken by GST or OldCo not in the ordinary course of business were subject to approval by the Bankruptcy Court. As a result, during the pendency of the GST Chapter 11 Case and the OldCo Chapter 11 Case, we did not have exclusive control over these companies. Accordingly, as required by GAAP, GST was deconsolidated beginning on the GST Petition Date and OldCo was deconsolidated beginning on the OldCo Petition Date.

~~Reconsolidation~~

GST and OldCo were reconsolidated upon the effective date of the consummation of the Joint Plan, which effective date was 12:01 a.m. on July 31, 2017. The reconsolidation of GST and OldCo was treated as a business acquisition in accordance with applicable accounting rules. The primary businesses comprising GST will be managed as part of ~~the~~our Garlock ~~division~~group of companies within ~~our~~the Sealing Products segment. Smaller businesses also reconsolidated with GST will be managed by the Technetics and Stemco divisions within this segment, by the Compressor Products International ("CPI") division within our Engineered Products segment, and by the Fairbanks Morse division, which comprises our Power Systems segment.

The business was acquired for $39.2 million, net of cash acquired.

The ~~following table presents the preliminary fair value~~purchase prices of the ~~net assets of GST and OldCo acquired. These estimates are subject to the final completion of the valuation process for GST and OldCo:~~

(in millions)
Accounts receivable $ 22.9
Inventories 29.2
Property, plant and equipment 63.2
Goodwill 132.6
Other intangible assets 180.8
Other assets 167.0
Liabilities assumed (110.5 )
Total purchase price $ 485.2

In accordance with GAAP, the purchase price for the acquisition was equal to the fair value of our investment in GST and OldCo on the reconsolidation date. In the reconsolidation, the investment in GST and OldCo is deemed to be exchanged for our exclusive control of these businesses. No cash is transferred in the reconsolidation transaction, other than the reconsolidation of GST's and OldCo's cash and cash equivalents at that date. The purchase price wasbusinesses acquired during 2019 were allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities ~~reconsolidated with these businesses~~assumed based on their estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase ~~price~~prices over the identifiable assets acquired less the liabilities assumed was reflected as ~~goodwill.~~goodwill which is attributable primarily to the value of the workforces and ongoing operation of the businesses. Goodwill recorded as part of the purchase price ~~allocation~~allocations was ~~$132.6~~$152.5 million, ~~none~~ of which $2.7 million is expected to be tax deductible ~~given the nature~~over a period of the transaction. See Note 8 - "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" for information on goodwill by reportable segment from this transaction. The goodwill recognized in this transaction is primarily attributable to intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition.

15 years. Identifiable intangible assets acquired as part of the ~~acquisition~~acquisitions were ~~$180.8~~$219.0 million, including ~~$40.4~~$1.1 million of indefinite-lived trade names and ~~$140.4~~$217.9 million of definite-lived intangible ~~assets. Definite-lived intangible~~ assets, ~~included~~including customer relationships, ~~of $85.4 million,~~ proprietary technology, ~~of $50.8 million,~~trade names, favorable leasehold interests and non-competition agreements, with a ~~favorable supply agreement valued at $4.2 million. The definite-lived intangible assets have an initial~~ weighted average amortization period of ~~15 years for each class.~~approximately 16 years.

~~Post-reconsolidation sales~~

The fair value of ~~$35.5~~the Rollover Equity is estimated as of closing to be $28.0 million. As part of the LeanTeq acquisition, EnPro has the right to buy (the “Call Option”), and the non-controlling interest holders have the right to sell (the “Put Option”) the Rollover Equity as follows:

EnPro shall have the right to buy, and the non-controlling interest holders have the right to sell, the Rollover Equity within 90 days following the third anniversary of the closing and payable in 2 installments as follows (the "Put/Call Price"):

Half of the price payable for the Rollover Equity will be equal to a pro rata portion of a multiple of EBITDA (as defined) generated by LeanTeq during the last twelve months (“LTM”) ending on the closest month end prior to the last month end before the purchase or sale (the "First Measurement Date") less LeanTeq's net debt in excess of cash as of the First Measurement Date (the "First Exercise Price"). The applicable multiple depends on the future LTM EBITDA margin and revenue growth;

The remaining half of the price payable for the Rollover Equity will be equal to an amount that is the higher of the First Exercise Price and a pro rata portion of a multiple of EBITDA generated by LeanTeq during the last twelve months (“LTM”) prior to the first anniversary of the First Measurement Date (the "Second Measurement Date") less LeanTeq’s net debt in excess of cash as of the Second Measurement Date. The applicable multiple depends on the future LTM EBITDA margin and revenue growth.

To estimate the fair value of the Put and Call Option, we used a Monte Carlo simulation in an option pricing framework (a special case of the Income Approach). In particular, we simulated the future equity value, revenue, and EBITDA of LeanTeq assuming a correlated Geometric Brownian Motion. For each simulation path, the Put and Call Option payoffs are calculated based on the contractual terms, and then discounted at the term-matched risk-free rate plus, in the case of the Put Option, allowance for counterparty credit risk. Finally, the value of the Put and Call Option is calculated as the average present value over all simulated paths. The model uses our revenue and EBITDA forecasts adjusted for risk to simulate future revenue and EBITDA in a risk-neutral framework. Due to the presence of the put arrangement, the Rollover Equity is presented as redeemable non-controlling interest since redemption is not solely within our control. We initially recognized the Rollover Equity at fair value, inclusive of the put-call provisions. We will adjust the redeemable non-controlling interest when the redemption value exceeds the carrying value with changes recognized as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital.

In addition, the Put Option or Call Option may be exercised in the event of certain employment terminations or other events. The Put/Call Price will be reduced 20 percent for certain types of employment terminations. As a result of this option related to employment termination, a portion of the non-controlling interest will be classified as compensation expense for financial reporting purposes. We calculated the value of this compensation (the “Compensation Amount”) using a with-and-without method. In particular, we calculated the value of the Compensation Amount as the difference between the value of the net Put and Call Options with and without the 20 percent discount applied to the First and Second Exercise Prices. Based on this approach we calculated the Compensation Amount to be $6.4 million, as of the valuation date. This amount will be recognized as compensation expense over the term of the Options and is subject to change based on the ultimate redemption value of the Rollover Equity.

We continue to evaluate the purchase price allocations of these acquisitions, primarily the value of certain intangible assets, and it may be revised in future periods as these estimates are finalized. The following table represents the preliminary purchase price allocations:



	(in millions)
Accounts receivable	$	9.8
Property, plant and equipment	7.9
Goodwill	152.5
Other intangible assets	219.0
Other assets	17.0
Deferred income taxes	(43.6		)
Liabilities assumed	(24.2		)
Redeemable non-controlling interest	(28.0		)
	$	310.4

Other assets include $5.4 million of indemnification assets which represent the sellers' obligation under the purchase agreements to indemnify us for a portion of their potential contingent liabilities related to certain tax matters. This amount is

currently fully included in escrow accounts related to the purchase transactions. If a timely claim is made, the amount of the claim will remain in escrow until the lapse in the statute of limitations or other settlement of the related tax issues based upon an actual assessment from a tax authority. We also recognized contingent liabilities related to these matters of $8.2 million as of the acquisition dates which are included in the liabilities assumed amount.

Sales of $2.9 million and pre-tax income ~~before taxes~~ of ~~$3.3~~$0.7 million ~~attributable to GST~~for LeanTeq and ~~OldCo~~Aseptic are included in our Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2019. The following ~~unaudited supplemental~~ pro forma condensed consolidated financial results of operations for the ~~Company for the~~ quarters and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016,~~2018 are presented as if the ~~reconsolidation~~acquisitions had been completed on January 1, ~~2016:~~2018:


	Quarters Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Quarters Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016		2019		2018		2019		2018
	(in millions)								(in millions)
Pro forma net sales	$	355.0	$	331.1	$	1,039.9	$	1,018.1	$	379.8	$	397.7	$	1,149.3	$	1,177.7
Pro forma net income	$	9.0	$	14.5	$	43.4	$	515.2	1.6		22.5		36.6		36.7
Pro forma earnings per share - basic	$	0.42	$	0.67	$	2.03	$	23.74
Pro forma earnings per share - diluted	$	0.41	$	0.67	$	2.00	$	23.52

These amounts have been calculated after applying our accounting policies and adjusting the results of LeanTeq and Aseptic to reflect the additional depreciation and amortization that would have been charged assuming the fair value adjustments to property, plant and equipment and intangible assets had been applied as of January 1, 2018 as well as additional interest expense to reflect financing required, together with the consequential tax effects. The ~~2017~~ supplemental pro forma net income for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2019 was adjusted to exclude ~~$3.8~~$5.6 million and $6.7 million, respectively, of pre-tax ~~nonrecurring expenses related to the fair value adjustment to acquisition date inventory.~~acquisition-related costs. The ~~2016~~ supplemental pro ~~forma net income was adjusted to include these charges. Pro~~ forma net income for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016 also includes the gain on reconsolidation discussed further below, as well as the tax impact of the reconsolidation discussed in Note 4 - "Income Taxes."~~

~~The supplemental pro forma net income for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016~~2018 was ~~also~~ adjusted to exclude a combined $1.3 million, $7.1 million, $(16.8) million and $145.9 million, respectively, of non-recurring expenses (credits) associated with the aforementioned asbestos claims resolution process recorded at EnPro and at GST and OldCo, as the process is assumed to have concluded in order for the reconsolidation to occur. The amount adjusted for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 is inclusive of $24.7include $6.7 million of credits for insurance reimbursements that became realizable for GST and OldCo in the current year. The amount adjusted for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 is inclusive of charges of $80.0 million and $49.5 million recorded by EnPro and GST, respectively, in that year in association with the Joint Plan to resolve current and future asbestos claims and the agreement with the Canadian provincial workers’ compensation boards (the “Provincial Boards”) resolving remedies the Provincial Boards may possess against Garlock of Canada Ltd, GST, Coltec or any of their affiliates. The remaining amount adjusted for each year consists of charges for Chapter 11 case-related fees and expenses including attorneys' and experts' fees and fees associated with the administration of Garrison. Please see Note 17 – "Commitments and Contingencies – Asbestos – Joint Plan of Reorganization" for further information on these ~~settlements and insurance reimbursements.~~

charges. These ~~unaudited supplemental~~ pro forma financial results have been prepared for comparative purposes ~~only.~~only and do not reflect the effect of synergies that would have been expected to result from the integration of these acquisitions. The pro forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results of operations that actually would have resulted had the ~~combination~~acquisitions occurred on January 1, ~~2016,~~2018, or of future results of the consolidated entities.

~~Associated with the reconsolidation of GST and OldCo,~~Divestiture

In September 2019 we recorded a ~~pretax gain~~$15.2 million pre-tax loss related to the sale of ~~$534.4 million. The amounts comprising the gain include:~~

(in millions)
Gain on revaluation of investment in GST and OldCo $ 248.3
Elimination of net amounts payable to GST and OldCo at reconsolidation date 286.1
Total $ 534.4

~~The gain on revaluation~~certain assets and certain liabilities of our ~~investment~~brake products business unit located in ~~GST~~Rome, Georgia and ~~OldCo~~included in our Sealing Product segment. The loss is ~~the difference between the above-noted fair value~~composed of the ~~investment and its book value of $236.9 million as~~loss on the sale of the ~~date~~business, which closed on September 25, 2019, and the loss on the sale of ~~reconsolidation. Although EnPro's investment~~the facility, which is expected to close in ~~OldCo was negative at~~ the time that it was deconsolidated from the EnPro results, EnPro Holdings, Inc. ("EnPro Holdings"), a subsidiary of EnPro, had entered into a keep well agreement with OldCo under which it unconditionally agreed to make equity contributions to OldCo sufficient to maintain OldCo's ability to pay and discharge its liabilities as they become due and payable. fourth quarter.

As a result of ~~this~~the agreement to sell the building, we recorded a ~~liability~~$0.6 million loss in other expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarter and nine months ending September 30, 2019, ceased depreciation, and recorded the building at the contracted sales price in other current assets on our Consolidated Balance sheet that represented this obligation related to our investment in OldCo. The liability balance of $15.6 million at the reconsolidation date was reduced from its balance at June 30, 2017 due to equity funding provided by us to OldCo in order for it to fund its initial $50 million payment in July 2017 to the trust established under the Joint Plan.

The portion of the gain attributable to elimination of net amounts payable to GST and OldCo is based upon the balances in EnPro's amounts due to and from GST and OldCo as of that date, including the notes payable to GST and related accrued interest, income tax receivable from GST, and other payables to and receivables from GST that arose in the normal course of business.

~~Financial Results~~

As the GST Chapter 11 Case and OldCo Chapter 11 Case were being administered jointly and the Joint Plan is applicable in both such cases, the financial information below combines the results of operations and cash flows of OldCo with GST LLC and Garrison for periods after the OldCo Petition Date.

Condensed combined financial information for GST and OldCo is set forth below, presented on a historical cost basis. For 2017, the Condensed Combined Statements of Operations and Condensed Combined Statement of Cash Flows reflect the results of operations and cash flows for GST and OldCo for the period time where they were not consolidated in our reported results (from January 1, 2017 through July 31, 2017 for GST and, for OldCo, after the OldCo Petition Date through July 31, 2017). Likewise, as GST and OldCo were included in our reported balance sheetSheet as of September 30, ~~2017, no Condensed Combined Balance Sheet~~2019. The expected closing of the building sale in the fourth quarter of 2019 will not result in a gain or loss.

The sale of the business resulted in a $14.6 million loss that is ~~provided as of this date.~~

Note that because the OldCo Chapter 11 Case had not commenced as of December 31, 2016, OldCo's assets and liabilities are excluded as of December 31, 2016. Its results of operations and cash flows are excluded from the Condensed Combinedincluded in other expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, ~~2016,~~2019. The loss is composed of an $11.4 million non-cash loss on the sale of the business and ~~the Condensed Combined Statement of Cash Flows~~a $3.2 million loss related to contract cancellation costs, severance, and other expenses.

The aggregate sales price for the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016.~~

~~GST and OldCo~~

~~(Debtors-in-Possession)~~

~~Condensed Combined Statements~~transaction is $7.0 million, of ~~Operations (Unaudited)~~

~~(in millions)~~

Quarters Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Net sales $ 15.3
$ 49.2
$ 125.9
$ 150.9
Cost of sales 9.6
31.3
77.9
95.3
Gross profit 5.7
17.9
48.0
55.6
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative 3.7
10.0
24.5
31.3
Asbestos-related (0.4 ) 0.1
(24.0 ) 50.1
Other —
0.1
0.1
0.4
Total operating expenses 3.3
10.2
0.6
81.8
Operating income (loss) 2.4
7.7
47.4
(26.2 )
Interest income, net 3.1
8.4
21.5
25.3
Income (loss) before reorganization expenses and income taxes 5.5
16.1
68.9
(0.9 )
Reorganization expenses (1.1 ) (6.8 ) (5.6 ) (14.8 )
Income (loss) before income taxes 4.4
9.3
63.3
(15.7 )
Income tax benefit (expense) (3.0 ) (3.7 ) (24.3 ) 5.9
Net income (loss) $ 1.4
$ 5.6
$ 39.0
$ (9.8 )
Comprehensive income (loss) $ 4.4
$ 5.0
$ 49.1
$ (9.0 )

~~GST and OldCo~~

~~(Debtors-in-Possession)~~

~~Condensed Combined Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)~~

~~Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~2016~~

~~(in millions)~~

2017 2016
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ (363.3 ) $ 32.9
Investing activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (1.8 ) (5.1 )
Proceeds from (payments on) loans to affiliates 43.6
(5.2 )
Proceeds from (purchases of) held-to-maturity securities 250.3
(50.5 )
Opening cash from OldCo 4.8
—
Other 0.1
(0.2 )
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 297.0
(61.0 )
Financing activities
Capital contribution from parent 45.2
—
Net cash provided by financing activities 45.2
—
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 2.4
1.4
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (18.7 ) (26.7 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 59.5
71.9
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 40.8
$ 45.2

~~GST~~

~~(Debtor-in-Possession)~~

~~Condensed Combined Balance Sheet (Unaudited)~~

~~(in millions)~~

December 31,
2016
Assets:

Notes receivable from affiliate - current $ 12.7
Other current assets 425.9
Asbestos insurance receivable 49.0
Deferred income taxes 126.0
Notes receivable from affiliate 283.2
Other assets 67.0
Total assets $ 963.8
Liabilities and Shareholder’s Equity:

Current liabilities $ 40.3
Other liabilities 126.0
Liabilities subject to compromise (A) 388.6
Total liabilities 554.9
Shareholder’s equity 408.9
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity $ 963.8

~~(A) Liabilities subject to compromise include pre-petition unsecured claims~~ which ~~may be resolved at amounts different from those recorded~~we received $3.6 million in the ~~condensed combined balance sheet. Liabilities subject to compromise consist principally~~third quarter of ~~asbestos-related claims. Per~~2019 at the ~~terms~~closing of the comprehensive settlement agreement with the appointed committee representing current asbestos claimants and the court-appointed representative of future claimants in the GST asbestos claims resolution process pending before the Bankruptcy Court, GST had accrued $387 million as of December 31, 2016 for asbestos-related claims. The accrual included (a) $370 million to be contributed to the trust for present and future asbestos claims against GST plus litigation and administrative expenses, and (b) $17 million for the resolution of all current and future Canadian asbestos claims alleging disease resulting in whole or in part from exposure to GST asbestos-containing products. See Note 17, “Commitments and Contingencies — Asbestos — Joint Plan of Reorganization."


3.	~~Acquisitions~~

~~In June 2017, we acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Qualiseal Technology (“Qualiseal”), a~~

privately-held company offering custom-engineered mechanical face and circumferential seals for demanding aerospace and industrial applications with annual revenues of approximately $11 million. Qualiseal is managed as part of our Technetics division within the Sealing Products segment.

~~The following table presents the purchase price allocation~~sale of the ~~Qualiseal acquisition:~~

(in millions)
Accounts receivable $ 1.6
Inventories 3.3
Property, plant and equipment 1.4
Goodwill 9.7
Other intangible assets 24.0
Liabilities assumed (0.5 )
Total purchase price $ 39.5

~~In April 2016, we acquired certain assets~~business, and ~~assumed certain liabilities of Rubber Fab Gasket & Molding, Inc. ("Rubber Fab"), a privately-held~~ ~~company offering a full range of high performance sanitary gaskets, hoses and fittings for~~expect to receive $3.0 million at the ~~hygienic process industries~~ ~~with annual revenues of approximately $17 million. Rubber Fab is managed as part of our Garlock division within the Sealing Products segment.~~

~~On October 12, 2017, we acquired 100%~~closing of the stock of Commercial Vehicle Components Co., Ltd. ("CVC"), a manufacturer of air disc brake and medium duty hydraulic disc brake pads for the heavy duty and light commercial vehicle aftermarket. CVC will be managed as part of our Stemco division within the Sealing Products segment. Due to the recencysale of the ~~transaction,~~building, and expect to receive the ~~initial accounting for this acquisition is incomplete.~~

~~Because the~~balance of $0.4 million in 2020. The assets, liabilities, and results of operations for ~~these acquisitions~~the brake products business unit are not significant to our consolidated financial position or ~~results~~result of ~~operations, pro forma financial information~~operations.


3.	Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Information regarding long-term engine contracts where revenue is recognized over time using an input method is as follows:



	September 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
	(in millions)
Cumulative revenues recognized on uncompleted contracts	$	455.9	$	452.5
Cumulative billings on uncompleted contracts	438.6		393.9
	$	17.3	$	58.6

These amounts were included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets under the following captions:



	September 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
	(in millions)
Accounts receivable, net (contract revenue recognized in excess of billings)	$	57.7		$	63.9
Accrued expenses (billings in excess of revenue recognized)	(40.4		)	(5.3		)
	$	17.3		$	58.6

The changes in our contract deferred revenue (billings in excess of revenue recognized) for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 are as follows:



	2019
Balance at beginning of period	$	5.5
Additional billings in excess of revenue recognized	63.2
Revenue recognized	(28.1		)
Balance at end of period	$	40.6

We make deposits and ~~additional disclosures~~progress payments to certain vendors for long-lead-time manufactured components associated with engine projects. At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, deposits and progress payments for long-lead-time components in our Power Systems segment totaled $1.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively. These deposits and progress payments are classified in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Assets and liabilities for long-term service contracts recognized over time were immaterial as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

As of September 30, 2019, the aggregate amount of transaction price of remaining performance obligations, or backlog, on a consolidated basis was $404.3 million. Approximately 88% of these obligations are expected to be satisfied within one year. The amount expected to be satisfied beyond September 30, 2020 is mainly attributable to our Power Systems segment and pertains to the contracts discussed above. Remaining performance obligations include those related to the contracts discussed above as well as orders across all of our businesses that we believe to be firm. However, there is no certainty these orders will result in actual sales at the times or in the amounts ordered. In addition, for most of our business, this total is not ~~presented.~~particularly predictive of future performance because of our short lead times and some seasonality.


4.	Income Taxes

Our income tax expense and resulting effective tax rate are based upon the estimated annual effective tax rates applicable for the respective periods adjusted for the effect of items required to be treated as discrete in the interim ~~period items,~~periods, including ~~the reconsolidation of the GST and OldCo entities and~~ losses generated in countries where we are projecting annual losses for which a deferred tax asset is not anticipated to be recognized. This estimated annual effective tax rate is ~~generally lower than U.S.~~affected by the relative proportions of revenue and income before taxes in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Based on the geographical mix of earnings, our global annual effective tax rate typically approximates the blended statutory ~~tax~~ rates ~~primarily due to the earnings in lower rate foreign jurisdictions where a significant portion of our income is taxed,~~ and fluctuates based on the portion of our profits earned in each jurisdiction. ~~In addition,~~

The effective tax rates for the quarters ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 were 878.7% and 1.2%, respectively. The high effective tax rate ~~can be magnified by~~for the three months ended September 30, 2019 is primarily the result of a geographical mix of lower pre-tax ~~losses~~income in ~~high~~the U.S. combined with new minimum tax ~~jurisdictions offset somewhat by~~on certain non-U.S. earnings and disproportionately higher pre-tax ~~profits~~income in ~~low~~higher foreign tax jurisdictions.

~~During~~ Pre-tax income in the U.S. for the third quarter of ~~2017, our~~2019 was adversely impacted by a loss on divestiture, acquisition costs, and environmental charges. The effective tax rate ~~was 9.3% as we recorded income~~for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 includes the minimum tax ~~expense~~on certain non-U.S. earnings, the favorable impact of ~~$50.5 million on pre-tax income~~discrete items occurring in the quarter resulting from a refinement of ~~$540.7 million.~~ the provisional estimate of our transition tax, and the tax benefit associated with the pension annuitization completed in the third quarter of 2018.

The effective tax rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 were 33.0% and 26.0%, respectively. The effective tax rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 reflect the impact of the reduction in the ~~effective~~U.S. federal statutory income tax rate ~~is primarily due~~ to the significant discrete items recorded in the current quarter including the $534.4 million non-taxable gain on the reconsolidation of the GST and OldCo entities and the $21.2 million benefit of the reversal of the deferred tax liability initially recorded on our investment in GST

~~when GST was deconsolidated in June 2010. This reduction is~~21.0%, partially offset by the ~~$72.7 million~~new minimum tax on certain non-U.S. earnings, and higher tax rates in most foreign jurisdictions. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was also favorably impacted by discrete items occurring as a result from a refinement of the provisional estimate of our transition tax, the tax benefit associated with the pension annuitization, and the tax charge associated with the ~~step up of GST and OldCo's net assets to fair value upon the reconsolidation.~~

~~During the third quarter of 2016, our effective tax rate was 39.6%~~benefit previously recognized for domestic production activities as we recorded an income tax expense of $4.0 million on pre-tax income of $10.0 million. The volatility in the quarterly tax rate is the result of using annual tax rates derived from a geographic mix of pre-tax losses and income, as applied to a year-to-date ordinary loss in the prior-year quarter that exceeds the anticipated ordinary loss for the full year. The combination of mix, overall loss limitations, and small denominators resulted in an unusually high effective quarterly rate.

During the first nine months of 2017, our effective tax rate was 9.9% as we recorded income tax expense of $55.7 million on pre-tax income of $561.3 million. The lower effective tax rate is primarily due to the significant discrete items recorded in the third quarter of 2017 as discussed above.

During the first nine months of 2016, our effective tax rate was 42.3% as we recorded an income tax benefit of $27.2 million on pre-tax loss of $64.4 million. The volatility during this nine-month period is a result of ~~our geographical mix of pre-tax losses in~~interpretive guidance issued during the ~~U.S., a higher tax jurisdiction, and pre-tax profits in lower tax jurisdictions.~~period by the IRS.

In June 2017, the ~~U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”)~~IRS began an examination of ~~one of~~ our 2014 U.S. federal income tax ~~returns.~~return. Although this examination is part of a routine and recurring cycle, we cannot predict the final outcome or expected conclusion date of the audit. Various foreign and state tax returns are also currently under examination and some of these exams may conclude within the next twelve months. The final outcomes of these audits are not yet determinable; however, management believes that any assessments that may arise will not have a material effect on our financial results.


5.	Earnings (Loss) Per Share



	Quarters Ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
	2019			2018		2019		2018
	(in millions, except per share amounts)
Numerator (basic and diluted):
Net income (loss)	$	(1.5	)	$	24.2	$	35.5	$	46.7
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares – basic	20.6			20.7		20.7		21.0
Share-based awards	—			0.2		0.1		0.2
Weighted-average shares – diluted	20.6			20.9		20.8		21.2
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic	$	(0.08	)	$	1.17	$	1.71	$	2.22
Diluted	$	(0.08	)	$	1.16	$	1.71	$	2.20

Quarters Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
(in millions, except per share amounts)
Numerator (basic and diluted):
Net income (loss) $ 490.2
$ 6.0
$ 505.6
$ (37.2 )
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares – basic 21.3
21.5
21.4
21.7
Share-based awards 0.5
0.2
0.3
—
Weighted-average shares – diluted 21.8
21.7
21.7
21.7
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic $ 22.98
$ 0.28
$ 23.68
$ (1.71 )
Diluted $ 22.49
$ 0.28
$ 23.32
$ (1.71 )

In the ~~nine months~~quarter ended September 30, ~~2016,~~2019 there was a loss attributable to common shares. There were ~~0.2~~0.1 million potentially dilutive shares excluded ~~for~~from the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016~~calculation of earnings per share during that period since they were antidilutive.


6.	Inventories



	September 30, 2019			December 31, 2018
	(in millions)
Finished products	$	141.7		$	142.9
Work in process	36.8			33.6
Raw materials and supplies	58.3			67.7
	236.8			244.2
Reserve to reduce certain inventories to LIFO basis	(11.3		)	(11.1		)
Total inventories	$	225.5		$	233.1

September 30,
2017 December 31,
2016
(in millions)
Finished products $ 122.9
$ 108.1
Work in process 36.2
23.7
Raw materials and supplies 57.5
49.3
216.6
181.1
Reserve to reduce certain inventories to LIFO basis (9.8 ) (12.1 )
Manufacturing inventories 206.8
169.0
Incurred costs relating to long-term contracts 8.3
13.6
Progress payments related to long-term contracts (4.3 ) (7.2 )
Net balance associated with completed-contract inventories 4.0
6.4
Total inventories $ 210.8
$ 175.4

Incurred costs related to long-term contracts in the table above represent inventoried work in process and finished products related to an engine contract accounted for under the completed-contract method, where costs incurred exceed customer billings.

~~Refer to Note 7, “Long-Term Contracts” for additional information about incurred costs and progress payments related to long-term contracts.~~

We use the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method of valuing certain of our inventories. An actual valuation of inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations are based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs, which are subject to change until the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation.


7.	~~Long-Term Contracts~~

~~Additional information regarding engine contracts accounted for under the percentage-of-completion (“POC”) method is as follows:~~

September 30,
2017 December 31,
2016
(in millions)
Cumulative revenues recognized on uncompleted POC contracts $ 321.4
$ 260.7
Cumulative billings on uncompleted POC contracts 280.1
231.6
$ 41.3
$ 29.1

~~These amounts were included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets under the following captions:~~

September 30,
2017 December 31,
2016
(in millions)
Accounts receivable, net (POC revenue recognized in excess of billings) $ 45.3
$ 31.4
Accrued expenses (billings in excess of POC revenue recognized) (4.0 ) (2.3 )
$ 41.3
$ 29.1

~~Additional information regarding an engine contract accounted for under the completed-contract method is as follows:~~

September 30,
2017 December 31,
2016
(in millions)
Incurred costs relating to long-term contract $ 0.3
$ 0.1
Progress payments related to long-term contract (0.9 ) (1.0 )
Net balance associated with completed-contract inventories $ (0.6 ) $ (0.9 )

Incurred costs related to long-term contract in the table above represent inventoried work in process and finished products related to an engine contract accounted for under the completed-contract method, where customer billings exceed costs incurred.

Progress payments related to the long term contract in the table above are either advanced billings or milestone billings to the customer on a contract accounted for under the completed-contract method. Upon shipment of the completed engine, revenue associated with the engine will be recognized, and the incurred inventoried costs and progress payments will be relieved.

At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, progress payments related to long-term contract shown above were in excess of incurred costs resulting in net liability balances. As such, the net liability balances are reflected in accrued expenses on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 6, “Inventories” for additional information about incurred costs and progress payments related to long-term contracts for which the incurred costs exceeded the progress payments.

In addition to inventoried costs, we also make deposits and progress payments to certain vendors for long lead time manufactured components associated with engine projects. At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, deposits and progress payments for long lead time components totaled $2.7 million and $0.8 million, respectively. These deposits and progress payments are classified in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.


8.	Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in the net carrying value of goodwill by reportable segment for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2019, are as follows:



	Sealing Products			Engineered Products		Power Systems		Total
	(in millions)
Goodwill as of December 31, 2018	$	311.3		$	10.8	$	11.6	$	333.7
Acquisitions of businesses	152.5			—		—		152.5
Divestiture of business	(1.3		)	—		—		(1.3		)
Foreign currency translation	(0.1		)	0.1		0.1		0.1
Goodwill as of September 30, 2019	$	462.4		$	10.9	$	11.7	$	485.0

Sealing
Products

Engineered
Products
Power Systems Total
(in millions)
Goodwill as of December 31, 2016 $ 185.3
$ 9.1
$ 7.1
$ 201.5
Change due to acquisition 9.7
—
—
9.7
Reconsolidation of GST and OldCo 125.9
1.8
4.9
132.6
Change due to foreign currency translation 0.9
—
—
0.9
Goodwill as of September 30, 2017 $ 321.8
$ 10.9
$ 12.0
$ 344.7

The goodwill balances reflected above are net of accumulated impairment losses of $27.8 million for the Sealing Products segment and $154.8 million for the Engineered Products segment as of September 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016.~~2018.

Identifiable intangible assets are as follows:



	As of September 30, 2019				As of December 31, 2018
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
	(in millions)
Amortized:
Customer relationships	$	472.3	$	157.9	$	284.5	$	150.2
Existing technology	124.5		49.4		112.3		45.1
Trademarks	39.7		23.8		35.3		23.1
Other	34.0		24.1		28.3		23.8
	670.5		255.2		460.4		242.2
Indefinite-Lived:
Trademarks	79.0		—		79.1		—
Total	$	749.5	$	255.2	$	539.5	$	242.2

As of September 30, 2017 As of December 31, 2016

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization

Gross
Carrying
Amount

Accumulated
Amortization
(in millions)
Amortized:
Customer relationships $ 314.0
$ 134.7
$ 216.2
$ 122.0
Existing technology 110.5
35.5
63.0
31.0
Trademarks 35.7
21.6
35.4
19.6
Other 28.5
22.9
23.2
22.1
488.7
214.7
337.8
194.7
Indefinite-Lived:
Trademarks 79.3
—
33.8
—
Total $ 568.0
$ 214.7
$ 371.6
$ 194.7

Amortization ~~expense~~ for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 were $7.4 million, $7.0 million, $21.4 million and $21.9 million, respectively.


8.	Leases

We regularly enter into operating leases primarily for real estate, equipment, and vehicles. Operating lease arrangements are generally utilized to secure the use of assets if the terms and conditions of the lease or the nature of the asset makes the lease arrangement more favorable than a purchase. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet. We have elected an accounting policy to combine lease and non-lease components.

Our building leases have remaining terms up to twelve years, some of which contain options to renew up to five years, and some of which contain options to terminate. Some leases contain non-lease components, which may include items such as building common area maintenance, building parking, or general service and maintenance provided for leased assets by the lessor. Our vehicle, equipment, and other leases have remaining lease terms up to seven years, some of which contain options to renew or become evergreen leases, with automatic renewing one-month terms, and some of which have options to terminate.

Our right of use assets and liabilities related to operating leases as of September 30, 2019 are as follows:



	Balance Sheet Classification	September 30, 2019
		(in millions)
Right-of-use assets	Other assets	$	37.8

Current liability	Accrued expenses	$	10.0
Long-term liability	Other liabilities	28.1
Total liability		$	38.1

Approximately 87% of our operating lease assets and liabilities arise from real estate leases and approximately 13% arise from equipment and vehicle leases.

Most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate for calculating the right of use assets and corresponding lease liabilities. Accordingly, we determine the interest rate that we would have to pay to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term and amount equal to the lease payments in similar economic environments. We used the incremental borrowing rate at January 1, 2019 for all leases that commenced prior to that date.

In the quarter ended September 30, ~~2017 and 2016 was $6.9~~2019, we had operating lease costs of $3.0 million and ~~$5.3~~our operating cash flows from operating leases were $3.1 million. Our short-term and variable lease costs were $0.6 million. We entered into additional operating leases, including leases acquired through business acquisitions, that resulted in new right-of-use assets totaling $10.3 million.

In the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we had operating lease costs of $8.9 million and our operating cash flows from operating leases were $9.3 million. Our short-term and variable leases costs were $1.6 million. We entered into additional operating leases, including leases acquired through business acquisitions, that resulted in new right-of-use assets totaling $16.3 million.

In the quarter ended September 30, 2019, we entered into a building lease that we obtain possession of in October 2020. As a result of entering into this lease, no asset or liability has been recognized as of September 30, 2019. We expect to recognize a new lease asset and liability of approximately $0.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2019.

Our weighted-average remaining lease term and weighted average discount rate at September 30, 2019 were 5.7 years and 4.1%, respectively. ~~Amortization~~

A maturity analysis of undiscounted operating lease liabilities is shown in the table below:



	Operating Lease Payments
	(in millions)
2019 (1)	$	3.2
2020	10.7
2021	8.2
2022	5.7
2023	4.6
Thereafter	11.4
Total lease payments	43.8
Less: interest	(5.0		)
Less: future leases	(0.7		)
Present value of lease liabilities	$	38.1

(1) Excludes the nine months ended September 30, 2019

The operating lease payments listed in the table above include all current leases and all known future leases that have yet to commence. The payments also include all renewal periods that we are reasonably certain to exercise.

We rarely enter into finance leases. Since finance lease amounts and related costs are not significant to our consolidated financial position or results of operations, additional disclosures regarding finance leases are not presented.

Future minimum lease payments by year and in the aggregate, under noncancelable operating leases with initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year, consisted of the following at December 31, 2018 (in millions):



2019	$	11.5
2020	9.0
2021	6.2
2022	4.4
2023	3.4
Thereafter	2.7
Total minimum payments	$	37.2

Net rent expense was $13.5 million for the ~~nine~~ ~~months~~year ended ~~September 30, 2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~2016~~ ~~was~~ ~~$17.1 million~~ ~~and~~ ~~$15.8 million, respectively.~~December 31, 2018.


9.	Accrued Expenses



	September 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
	(in millions)
Salaries, wages and employee benefits	$	53.8	$	59.5
Interest	9.4		4.9
Customer advances	42.2		7.1
Environmental	16.3		16.4
Warranty	4.9		10.9
Income and other taxes	27.9		21.8
Operating lease liabilities	10.0		—
Other	36.3		29.8
	$	200.8	$	150.4

September 30,
2017 December 31,
2016
(in millions)
Salaries, wages and employee benefits $ 53.8
$ 40.0
Interest 1.6
38.1
Customer advances 8.6
5.3
Income and other taxes 16.8
11.2
Other 38.9
36.4
$ 119.7
$ 131.0


10.	~~Related Party Transactions~~Long-Term Debt

Revolving Credit Facility

On ~~the GST Petition Date, GST commenced an asbestos claims resolution process under Chapter 11~~September 25, 2019, we entered into a First Amendment (the "First Amendment") to our Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement”) among EnPro Industries, Inc. and EnPro Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the ~~United States Bankruptcy Code.~~Company (“EnPro Holdings”), as borrowers, the guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer. The ~~resulting deconsolidation~~Credit Agreement provides for a five-year, senior secured revolving credit facility of ~~GST from our~~$400.0 million (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and a five-year, senior secured term loan facility of $150.0 million (the "Term Loan Facility" and, together with the Revolving Credit Facility, the "Facilities"). The Amended Credit Agreement also provides that the borrowers may seek incremental term loans and/or additional revolving credit commitments in an amount equal to the greater of $225.0 million and 100% of consolidated EBITDA (as defined) for the most recently ended four-quarter period for which we have reported financial results, ~~discussed more fully~~plus additional amounts based on a consolidated senior secured leverage ratio.

Initially, borrowings under the Facilities bear interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 1.50% or base rate plus 0.50%, although the interest rates under the Facilities are subject to incremental increases based on a consolidated total net leverage ratio. In addition, a commitment fee accrues with respect to the unused amount of the Revolving Credit Facility at an annual rate of 0.175%, which rate is also subject to incremental increase or decrease based on a consolidated total net leverage ratio.

The Term Loan Facility will amortize on a quarterly basis in ~~Note 2, "Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC, Garrison Litigation Management Group, Ltd.,~~an annual amount equal to 2.50% of the original principal amount of the Term Loan Facility in each of years one through three, 5.00% of such original principal amount in year four, and ~~OldCo, LLC", required~~1.25% of such original principal amount in each of the first three quarters of year five, with the remaining outstanding principal amount payable at maturity.

The Facilities are subject to prepayment with the net cash proceeds of certain ~~intercompany indebtedness described below to be reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.~~asset sales, casualty or condemnation events, and non-permitted debt issuances.

~~As of~~ ~~December 31, 2016, Coltec Finance~~The Company ~~Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of~~and EnPro Holdings ~~had~~are the permitted borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility. We have the ability to add foreign subsidiaries as borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility for up to $100.0 million (or its foreign currency equivalent) in aggregate ~~short-term~~ borrowings, subject to certain conditions. Each of ~~$26.2 million~~ ~~from GST’s~~our domestic, consolidated subsidiaries ~~in Mexico~~are required to guarantee the obligations of the borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility, and ~~Australia. These unsecured obligations were denominated~~each of our existing domestic, consolidated subsidiaries has entered into the Credit Agreement to provide such a guarantee.

Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are secured by a first-priority pledge of certain assets. The Credit Agreement contains certain financial covenants and required financial ratios including a maximum consolidated total net leverage and a minimum consolidated interest coverage as defined in the ~~currency~~Credit Agreement. We were in compliance with all covenants of the lending party, and bore interest based on the applicable one-month interbank offered rate for each foreign currency involved. With the reconsolidation of GST in the third quarter, these borrowings are now intercompany and are therefore not reflected on our Consolidated Balance SheetCredit Agreement as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2019.

~~Effective as of January 1, 2010, Coltec Industries Inc ("Coltec") entered into an original issue amount~~ ~~$73.4 million~~ ~~Amended and Restated Promissory Note due January 1, 2017 (the “Coltec Note”) in favor of GST LLC, and our subsidiary Stemco LP entered into an original issue amount~~ ~~$153.8 million~~ ~~Amended and Restated Promissory Note due January 1, 2017, in favor of GST LLC (the “Stemco Note”, and together with the Coltec Note, the “Notes Payable to GST”).~~ The Notes Payable to GST amended and replaced promissory notes in the same principal amounts which were initially issued in March 2005, and which matured on January 1, 2010. In connection with the Coltec Restructuring described in Note 17, "Commitments and Contingencies — Asbestos — Joint Plan of Reorganization", the obligations of OldCo, as the successor by merger to Coltec,borrowing availability under the Notes Payable to GST were assumed by EnPro Holdings and OldCo was released from those obligations. In addition, the Coltec Note and the Stemco Note were amended to extend their maturity date to January 1, 2018.

~~The Notes Payable to GST bear interest at~~ ~~11%~~ ~~per annum, of which~~ ~~6.5%~~ ~~is payable in cash and~~ ~~4.5%~~ ~~is added to the principal amount of the Notes Payable to GST as payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest, with interest due on January 31 of each year. In conjunction with the interest payments in~~ ~~2017~~ ~~and~~ ~~2016~~, ~~$19.3 million~~ ~~and~~ ~~$18.4 million, respectively, was paid in cash and PIK interest of~~ ~~$13.4 million~~ ~~and~~ ~~$12.7 million~~, respectively, was added to the principal balance of the Notes Payable to GST. If GST LLC is unable to pay ordinary course operating expenses, under certain conditions, it can require EnPro Holdings and Stemco to pay in cash the accrued PIK interest necessary to meet such ordinary course operating expenses, subject to certain caps. The interest due under the Notes Payable to GST may be satisfied through offsets of amounts due under intercompany services agreements pursuant to which we provide certain corporate services, make available access to group insurance coverage to GST, make advances to third party providers related to payroll and certain benefit plans sponsored by GST, and permit employees of GST to participate in certain of our benefit plans.

The Coltec Note is secured by EnPro Holdings' pledge of certain of its equity ownership in specified U.S. subsidiaries. The Stemco Note is guaranteed by EnPro Holdings and secured by EnPro Holdings' pledge of its interest in Stemco. With the reconsolidation of GST in the third quarter, these borrowings are now intercompany and are therefore not reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2017.

We regularly transacted business with GST through the purchase and sale of products while it was not consolidated in EnPro's financial statements. We also provided services for GST including information technology, supply chain, treasury, accounting and tax administration, legal, and human resources under a support services agreement. GST is included in our consolidated U.S. federal income tax return and certain state combined income tax returns. As the parent of these consolidated tax groups, we are liable for, and pay, income taxes owed by the entire group. We have agreed with GST to allocate group taxes to GST based on the U.S. consolidated tax return regulations and current income tax accounting guidance. This method generally allocates taxes to GST as if it were a separate taxpayer. As a result, at December 31, 2016 we carried an income tax

~~receivable from GST related to this allocation. We did not carry a receivable~~Credit Agreement at September 30, ~~2017 on our consolidated balance sheet as a result~~2019 was $212.8 million after giving consideration to $17.5 million of ~~the reconsolidation~~outstanding letters of ~~GST.~~credit, $169.7 million of outstanding Revolving Credit Facility borrowings, and $150.0 million of outstanding Term Loan Facility borrowings.

As discussed further in Note 17, "Commitments and Contingencies - Asbestos - Joint Plan of Reorganization," on January 30, 2017, OldCo filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. We provided similar services to OldCo to those mentioned above for GST during the period from the OldCo Petition Date through the consummation of the Joint Plan, when it was reconsolidated into EnPro, but on a much less extensive basis due to OldCo's limited operations.

~~Amounts included in our consolidated financial statements arising from transactions with GST and OldCo during the periods which they were not consolidated in our results include the following:~~

Consolidated Statements of Operations Caption Quarters Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
Description 2017 2016 2017 2016
(in millions)
Sales to GST Net sales $ 2.5
$ 6.8
$ 20.8
$ 20.4
Purchases from GST Cost of sales $ 1.4
$ 4.0
$ 12.2
$ 13.2
Interest expense to GST Interest expense $ 3.0
$ 8.4
$ 20.6
$ 25.0
Senior Notes

Description Consolidated Balance Sheets Caption December 31,
2016
(in millions)
Due from GST Accounts receivable, net $ 21.4
Income tax receivable from GST Deferred income taxes and income tax receivable $ 119.0
Due from GST Other assets $ 1.4
Due to GST Accounts payable $ 6.3
Accrued interest to GST Accrued expenses $ 32.6


~~11.~~	~~Long-Term Debt~~

~~Senior Notes~~

In ~~September 2014,~~October 2018, we completed anthe offering of ~~$300~~$350.0 million aggregate principal amount of ~~our 5.875%~~5.75% Senior Notes due ~~2022~~2026 (the ~~“Senior Notes”~~"Senior Notes"). ~~We issued the notes net of an original issue discount of $2.4 million.~~

The Senior Notes are unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of EnPro and mature on ~~September~~October 15, ~~2022.~~2026. Interest on the Senior Notes accrues at a rate of ~~5.875%~~5.75% per annum and is payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on ~~March~~April 15 and ~~September~~October 15 of each ~~year. The debt discount is being amortized through interest expense until the maturity date resulting in an effective interest rate of 6.00%.~~year, commencing on April 15, 2019. The Senior Notes are required to be guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of ~~EnPro’s~~EnPro's existing and future direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries that is a borrower under, or guarantees, our indebtedness under the Revolving Credit Facility or guarantees any other Capital Markets Indebtedness (as defined in the indenture governing the Senior Notes) of EnPro or any of the guarantors.

On or after ~~September~~October 15, ~~2017,~~2021, we may, on any one or more ~~occasions,~~occasion, redeem all or a part of the Senior Notes at specified redemption prices plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, we may redeem a portion of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes before October 15, 2021 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at a specified redemption price plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the redemption price. We may also redeem some or all of the Senior Notes before October 15, 2021 at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, but not including, the redemption date, plus a "make whole" premium.

Each holder of the Senior Notes may require us to repurchase some or all of the Senior Notes held by such holder for cash upon the occurrence of a defined ~~“change~~"change of ~~control”~~control" event. Our ability to redeem the Senior Notes prior to maturity is subject to certain conditions, including in certain cases the payment of make-whole amounts.

The indenture governing the Senior Notes ~~includes~~included covenants that restrict our ability to engage in certain activities, including incurring additional indebtedness, ~~and~~ paying dividends, and repurchasing shares of our common stock, subject in each case to specified exceptions and qualifications set forth in the indenture.

In March 2017, we completed an add-on offering of $150.0 million of our 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “Additional Notes"). We issued the notes inclusive of an original issue premium of $1.5 million. The offer was made in the

United States to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and to non-U.S. persons in offshore transactions in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act.

The indenture for the Additional Notes contains the same interest payment, redemption, change of control, covenant, and guarantee provisions as for the Senior Notes. The debt premium is being amortized through interest expense until the maturity date resulting in an effective interest rate of 5.66%.

The proceeds from the offering of the Additional Notes were used primarily to repay outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility (described below) in order to increase availability to fund future capital requirements, including those funding requirements associated with the Joint Plan of OldCo and GST, which are described in Note 17, "Commitments and Contingencies — Asbestos — Joint Plan of Reorganization."

~~Revolving Credit Facility~~

We have a $300 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 2.00% or base rate plus 1.00%, although the interest rates under the Revolving Credit Facility are subject to incremental increases or decreases based on a consolidated total leverage ratio. In addition, a commitment fee accrues with respect to the unused amount of the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility expires in August 2019.

Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility are secured by a first priority pledge of certain of our assets. The Revolving Credit Facility contains financial covenants and required financial ratios, including a maximum consolidated total net leverage and a minimum consolidated interest coverage as defined in the agreement. It also contains affirmative and negative covenants which are subject to customary exceptions and qualifications. We were in compliance with all such covenants as of September 30, 2017.

~~The borrowing availability under our Revolving Credit Facility at~~ ~~September 30, 2017~~ ~~was~~ ~~$169.7 million~~ ~~after giving consideration to~~ ~~$14.5 million~~ ~~of outstanding letters of credit and $115.8 million of outstanding revolver borrowings.~~

In October 2016, the Revolving Credit Facility was amended to permit various transactions as part of the contemplated corporate restructuring of Coltec, which is discussed further in Note 17, "Commitments and Con~~tingencies — Asbestos — Joint Plan of Reorganization~~." Permitted borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility now include EnPro Holdings in addition to EnPro. Each of our domestic consolidated subsidiaries is required to guarantee the obligations of the borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility, and each of our existing domestic, consolidated subsidiaries has provided such a guarantee.


~~12.~~11.	Pensions and Postretirement Benefits

The components of net periodic benefit cost for our U.S. and foreign defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018, are as follows:



	Quarters Ended September 30,										Nine months ended September 30,
	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits				Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	2019			2018			2019		2018		2019			2018			2019		2018
	(in millions)
Service cost	$	1.1		$	1.2		$	—	$	—	$	3.4		$	3.7		$	0.1	$	0.1
Interest cost	3.1			2.9			—		—		9.2			9.7			0.1		0.1
Expected return on plan assets	(4.0		)	(4.2		)	—		—		(12.0		)	(14.9		)	—		—
Amortization of prior service cost	—			—			0.1		0.1		0.1			0.1			0.1		0.1
Amortization of net loss	1.7			1.1			—		—		5.0			4.0			—		—
Settlement	—			12.8					—		—			12.8					—
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1.9		$	13.8		$	0.1	$	0.1	$	5.7		$	15.4		$	0.3	$	0.3

Quarters Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Pension Benefits Other Benefits Pension Benefits Other Benefits
2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016 2017 2016
(in millions)
Service cost $ 1.2
$ 1.0
$ —
$ 0.1
$ 3.3
$ 3.2
$ 0.1
$ 0.3
Interest cost 3.3
3.2
—
—
9.3
9.5
0.1
0.2
Expected return on plan assets (5.2 ) (4.3 ) —
—
(14.3 ) (12.7 ) —
—
Amortization of prior service cost 0.1
—
0.1
—
0.1
—
0.1
—
Amortization of net loss 1.8
1.7
—
—
5.4
5.1
—
—
Deconsolidation of GST —
(0.2 ) —
—
(0.3 ) (0.7 ) —
—
Net periodic benefit cost $ 1.2
$ 1.4
$ 0.1
$ 0.1
$ 3.5
$ 4.4
$ 0.3
$ 0.5

~~For~~Contributions of $20.0 million were made in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, we contributed $8.8 million~~2018 to our U.S. defined benefit pension plans. ~~Contributions of $14.8 million were made in the corresponding prior year period. Based upon available information, which is subject to change, we~~We do not expect to make ~~further~~any contributions ~~to our U.S. defined benefit pension plan~~ in ~~the fourth quarter of 2017.~~2019.


~~13.~~12.	Shareholders' Equity

Changes in shareholders' equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 are as follows:



	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Treasury Stock			Total Permanent Shareholders' Equity			Redeemable non-controlling interest
(in millions)	Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Treasury Stock			Total Permanent Shareholders' Equity			Redeemable non-controlling interest
Balance, December 31, 2018	20.7		$	0.2	$	301.0		$	603.3		$	(45.5	)	$	(1.3	)	$	857.7		$	—
Adoption of new accounting standard	—		—		—			11.5			(11.5		)	—			—			—
Net income	—		—		—			13.1			—			—			13.1			—
Other comprehensive income	—		—		—			—			6.8			—			6.8			—
Dividends	—		—		—			(5.3		)	—			—			(5.3		)	—
Share repurchases	—		—		(2.4		)	—			—			—			(2.4		)	—
Incentive plan activity	0.1		—		1.2			—			—			—			1.2			—
Balance, March 31, 2019	20.8		0.2		299.8			622.6			(50.2		)	(1.3		)	871.1			—
Net income	—		—		—			23.9			—			—			23.9			—
Other comprehensive loss	—		—		—			—			(2.6		)	—			(2.6		)	—
Dividends	—		—		—			(5.2		)	—			—			(5.2		)	—
Share repurchases	(0.2	)	—		(12.6		)	—			—			—			(12.6		)	—
Incentive plan activity	—		—		1.6			—			—			—			1.6			—
Balance, June 30, 2019	20.6		0.2		288.8			641.3			(52.8		)	(1.3		)	876.2			—
LeanTeq acquisition	—		—		—			—			—			—			—			28.0
Net loss	—		—		—			(1.5		)	—			—			(1.5		)	—
Other comprehensive income	—		—		—			—			5.2			—			5.2			—
Dividends	—		—		—			(5.2		)	—			—			(5.2		)	—
Incentive plan activity	—		—		1.7			—			—			—			1.7			—
Balance, September 30, 2019	20.6		$	0.2	$	290.5		$	634.6		$	(47.6	)	$	(1.3	)	$	876.4		$	28.0

Changes in shareholders' equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 are as follows:



	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Treasury Stock			Total Shareholders' Equity
(in millions)	Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Treasury Stock			Total Shareholders' Equity
Balance, December 31, 2017	21.3		$	0.2	$	347.9		$	604.4		$	(48.4	)	$	(1.3	)	$	902.8
Adoption of new accounting standard	—		—		—			(0.3		)	—			—			(0.3		)
Net income	—		—		—			12.6			—			—			12.6
Other comprehensive income	—		—		—			—			9.8			—			9.8
Dividends	—		—		—			(5.2		)	—			—			(5.2		)
Share repurchases	(0.2	)	—		(16.9		)	—			—			—			(16.9		)
Incentive plan activity	0.1		—		(1.7		)	—			—			—			(1.7		)
Balance, March 31, 2018	21.2		0.2		329.3			611.5			(38.6		)	(1.3		)	901.1
Net income	—		—		—			9.9			—			—			9.9
Other comprehensive loss	—		—		—			—			(9.9		)	—			(9.9		)
Dividends	—		—		—			(5.1		)	—			—			(5.1		)
Share repurchases	(0.5	)	—		(33.0		)	—			—			—			(33.0		)
Incentive plan activity	—		—		1.7			—			—			—			1.7
Balance, June 30, 2018	20.7		0.2		298.0			616.3			(48.5		)	(1.3		)	864.7
Net income	—		—		—			24.2			—			—			24.2
Other comprehensive income	—		—		—			—			11.8			—			11.8
Dividends	—		—		—			(5.0		)	—			—			(5.0		)
Share repurchases	—		—		(0.1		)	—			—			—			(0.1		)
Incentive plan activity	—		—		1.2			—			—			—			1.2
Balance, September 30, 2018	20.7		$	0.2	$	299.1		$	635.5		$	(36.7	)	$	(1.3	)	$	896.8

We ~~have adopted a policy under which we~~ intend to declare regular quarterly cash dividends on our common stock, as determined by our board of directors, after taking into account our cash flows, earnings, financial position, debt covenants and other relevant matters. In accordance with this policy, total dividend payments of ~~$14.3~~$15.7 million were made during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2019.

In October ~~2017,~~2019, our board of directors ~~authorized~~declared a dividend of ~~$0.22~~$0.25 per share, payable on December ~~20, 2017~~18, 2019 to all shareholders of record as of December ~~6, 2017.~~4, 2019.

In October ~~2015,~~2018, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of our outstanding common shares. During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2019 we repurchased 0.2 million shares for ~~$11.5 million, all of which settled~~$15.0 million. NaN shares were repurchased during the ~~period.~~quarter ended September 30, 2019. The remaining amount of authorized purchases in the program at September 30, ~~2017~~2019 was ~~$2.8~~$35.0 million. The ~~program authorization expired in October 2017, with no further purchases made after September 30, 2017.~~

~~Also in October 2017, our~~ board of ~~directors authorized a new program for the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of our outstanding common shares. This program~~directors' authorization ~~will expire~~expires in October 2020.


~~14.~~13.	Business Segment Information

We aggregate our operating businesses into ~~three~~3 reportable segments. The factors considered in determining our reportable segments are the economic similarity of the businesses, the nature of products sold or services provided, the production processes and the types of customers and distribution methods. Our reportable segments are managed separately based on these differences.

Our Sealing Products segment designs, manufactures and sells sealing products, including: metallic, non-metallic and composite material gaskets, dynamic seals, compression packing, resilient metal seals, elastomeric seals, custom-engineered mechanical seals for applications in the aerospace industry and other markets, hydraulic components, expansion joints, flange sealing and isolation products, pipeline casing spacers/isolators, casing end seals, modular sealing systems for sealing pipeline

penetrations, sanitary gaskets, hoses and fittings for the hygienic process industries, fluid transfer products for the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industries. hole forming products, manhole infiltration sealing systems, bellows and bellows assemblies, pedestals for semiconductor manufacturing, ~~custom-engineered mechanical seals for applications in the aerospace industry and other markets,~~ PTFE products, and heavy-duty commercial vehicle parts used in the wheel-end, braking, suspension, and tire and mileage optimization systems.

In addition to these products, we also provide cleaning and refurbishment services for critical components and assemblies used in state-of-the-art semiconductor equipment. The equipment serviced is used to produce advanced microchips for smartphones, autonomous vehicles, high-speed wireless connectivity, artificial intelligence, and other applications.

Our Engineered Products segment includes operations that design, manufacture and sell self-lubricating, non-rolling metal-polymer, solid polymer and filament wound bearing products, aluminum blocks for hydraulic applications, and precision engineered components and lubrication systems for reciprocating compressors.

Our Power Systems segment designs, manufactures, sells and services heavy-duty, medium-speed diesel, natural gas and dual fuel reciprocating ~~engines.~~

engines, including parts and services.

Segment profit is total segment revenue reduced by operating expenses, restructuring and other costs identifiable with the segment. Corporate expenses include general corporate administrative costs. Expenses not directly attributable to the segments, corporate expenses, net interest expense, ~~asset impairments,~~ gains and losses related to the sale of assets, and income taxes are not included in the computation of segment profit. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those for EnPro.

Segment operating results and other financial data for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 were as follows:



	Quarters Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2019			2018			2019			2018
	(in millions)
Sales
Sealing Products	$	226.9		$	249.6		$	690.7		$	737.2
Engineered Products	72.9			78.1			231.4			249.4
Power Systems	74.0			61.4			201.1			167.2
	373.8			389.1			1,123.2			1,153.8
Intersegment sales	(0.8		)	(0.9		)	(2.9		)	(3.2		)
Net sales	$	373.0		$	388.2		$	1,120.3		$	1,150.6
Segment Profit
Sealing Products	$	19.4		$	35.9		$	69.6		$	78.9
Engineered Products	9.0			8.4			25.3			34.9
Power Systems	8.9			8.7			24.6			12.5
Total segment profit	37.3			53.0			119.5			126.3
Corporate expenses	(7.5		)	(7.6		)	(23.7		)	(24.8		)
Interest expense, net	(3.8		)	(5.9		)	(12.5		)	(20.8		)
Other expense, net	(25.8		)	(15.0		)	(30.3		)	(17.6		)
Income before income taxes	$	0.2		$	24.5		$	53.0		$	63.1

Quarters Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
(in millions)
Sales
Sealing Products $ 213.7
$ 175.3
$ 584.3
$ 532.6
Engineered Products 75.5
65.7
226.3
213.5
Power Systems 55.4
52.5
139.4
157.2
344.6
293.5
950.0
903.3
Intersegment sales (0.9 ) (0.8 ) (2.9 ) (2.5 )
Net sales $ 343.7
$ 292.7
$ 947.1
$ 900.8
Segment Profit
Sealing Products $ 23.5
$ 23.1
$ 65.0
$ 62.4
Engineered Products 7.7
2.9
25.4
10.4
Power Systems 8.2
7.3
20.6
15.5
Total segment profit 39.4
33.3
111.0
88.3
Corporate expenses (9.7 ) (6.4 ) (24.3 ) (21.9 )
Asbestos settlement —
—
—
(80.0 )
Gain on reconsolidation of GST and OldCo 534.4
—
534.4
—
Interest expense, net (10.3 ) (14.0 ) (41.2 ) (41.0 )
Other expense, net (13.1 ) (2.9 ) (18.6 ) (9.8 )
Income (loss) before income taxes $ 540.7
$ 10.0
$ 561.3
$ (64.4 )

Segment assets are as follows:


	September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		September 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
	(in millions)				(in millions)
Sealing Products	$	1,088.3	$	636.4	$	1,379.0	$	1,009.3
Engineered Products	231.2		210.0		229.0		220.5
Power Systems	196.3		164.8		261.9		266.1
Corporate	326.6		535.2		199.8		219.9
	$	1,842.4	$	1,546.4	$	2,069.7	$	1,715.8

Revenue by End Market

Due to the diversified nature of our business and the wide array of products that we offer, we sell into a number of end markets. Underlying economic conditions within these markets are a major driver of our segments' sales performance. Below is a summary of our third party sales by major end market with which we do business for the quarters ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:



	Quarter Ended September 30, 2019
(in millions)	Sealing Products		Engineered Products		Power Systems		Total
Aerospace	$	16.1	$	3.8	$	—	$	19.9
Automotive	0.5		17.8		—		18.3
Chemical and material processing	14.7		12.2		—		26.9
Food and pharmaceutical	13.0		0.2		—		13.2
General industrial	37.7		23.4		—		61.1
Medium-duty/heavy-duty truck	89.7		0.6		—		90.3
Navy and marine	0.2		—		63.3		63.5
Oil and gas	15.6		7.8		0.6		24.0
Power generation	11.9		2.5		9.9		24.3
Semiconductors	25.5		—		—		25.5
Other	1.3		4.5		0.2		6.0
Total third party sales	$	226.2	$	72.8	$	74.0	$	373.0



	Quarter Ended September 30, 2018
(in millions)	Sealing Products		Engineered Products		Power Systems		Total
Aerospace	$	14.3	$	2.2	$	—	$	16.5
Automotive	1.3		20.7		—		22.0
Chemical and material processing	15.4		12.3		—		27.7
Food and pharmaceutical	9.5		0.2		—		9.7
General industrial	30.4		24.9		—		55.3
Medium-duty/heavy-duty truck	107.6		0.5		—		108.1
Navy and marine	0.3		—		46.7		47.0
Oil and gas	13.9		10.4		3.3		27.6
Power generation	14.1		3.6		10.5		28.2
Semiconductors	31.0		—		—		31.0
Other	11.0		3.2		0.9		15.1
Total third party sales	$	248.8	$	78.0	$	61.4	$	388.2

Below is a summary of our third party sales by major end market with which we do business for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018:



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019
(in millions)	Sealing Products		Engineered Products		Power Systems		Total
Aerospace	$	43.0	$	9.5	$	—	$	52.5
Automotive	2.0		63.6		—		65.6
Chemical and material processing	43.3		37.4		—		80.7
Food and pharmaceutical	32.2		0.5		—		32.7
General industrial	123.6		74.1		—		197.7
Medium-duty/heavy-duty truck	276.7		0.9		—		277.6
Navy and marine	0.6		—		167.0		167.6
Oil and gas	46.6		29.6		3.0		79.2
Power generation	35.2		7.2		30.7		73.1
Semiconductors	78.0		—		—		78.0
Other	7.1		8.1		0.4		15.6
Total third party sales	$	688.3	$	230.9	$	201.1	$	1,120.3



	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
(in millions)	Sealing Products		Engineered Products		Power Systems		Total
Aerospace	$	39.2	$	6.5	$	—	$	45.7
Automotive	4.3		76.2		—		80.5
Chemical and material processing	39.6		39.1		—		78.7
Food and pharmaceutical	27.5		0.7		—		28.2
General industrial	125.2		78.0		—		203.2
Medium-duty/heavy-duty truck	302.9		0.8		—		303.7
Navy and marine	0.6		—		118.2		118.8
Oil and gas	41.7		33.6		7.5		82.8
Power generation	46.9		8.9		39.1		94.9
Semiconductors	89.6		—		—		89.6
Other	17.0		5.1		2.4		24.5
Total third party sales	$	734.5	$	248.9	$	167.2	$	1,150.6


14.	Derivatives and Hedging

In September 2018, we entered into cross-currency swap agreements (the "Original Swap") with a notional amount of $200.0 million to manage foreign currency risk by effectively converting a portion of the interest payments related to our fixed-rate U.S. Dollar (“USD”)-denominated Senior Notes, including the semi-annual interest payments thereunder, to interest payments on fixed-rate Euro-denominated debt of 172.8 million EUR with a weighted average interest rate of 2.8%, with interest payment dates of March 15 and September 15 of each year. The Original Swap agreement matures on September 15, 2022.

In May 2019, we entered into additional cross-currency swap agreements (the "Additional Swap") with a notional amount of $100.0 million to manage an increased portion of our foreign currency risk by effectively converting a portion of the interest payments related to our fixed-rate USD-denominated Senior Notes, including the semi-annual interest payments thereunder, to interest payments on fixed-rate Euro-denominated debt of 89.6 million EUR with a weighted average interest rate of 3.5%, with interest payment dates of April 15 and October 15 of each year. The Additional Swap agreement matures on October 15, 2026.

During the term of the swap agreements, we will receive semi-annual payments from the counterparties due to the difference between the interest rate on the Senior Notes and the interest rate on the Euro debt underlying each of the swaps. There was no principal exchange at the inception of the arrangements, and there will be no exchange at maturity. At maturity (or earlier at our option), we and the counterparties will settle the swap agreements at their fair value in cash based on the

aggregate notional amount and the then-applicable currency exchange rate compared to the exchange rate at the time the swap agreements were entered into.

We have designated these cross-currency swaps as qualifying hedging instruments and are accounting for them as a net investment hedge. At September 30, 2019, the combined fair values of the Original Swap and the Additional Swap were recorded as a $17.2 million asset within other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The gains and losses resulting from fair value adjustments to the cross currency-swap agreements, excluding interest accruals related to the above receipts, are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss within our cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment, as the swaps are effective in hedging the designated risk. Cash flows related to the cross-currency swaps are included in operating activities in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, aside from the ultimate settlement at maturity with the counterparties, which will be included in investing activities.


15.	Fair Value Measurements

~~We utilize a fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:~~

~~Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.~~

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

~~Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect our own assumptions.~~

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized as follows:


	Fair Value Measurements as of				Fair Value Measurements as of
	September 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		September 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
	(in millions)				(in millions)
Assets
Time deposits	$	32.3	$	26.0	$	27.4	$	33.4
Foreign currency derivatives					17.2		4.5
Deferred compensation assets	7.3		7.0		10.2		8.6
	$	39.6	$	33.0	$	54.8	$	46.5
Liabilities
Deferred compensation liabilities	$	8.5	$	8.3	$	10.5	$	8.9

Our time deposits and deferred compensation assets and liabilities are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices. Our foreign currency derivatives are classified as Level 2 as their value is calculated based upon observable inputs including market USD/Euro exchange rates and market interest rates.

The carrying values of our significant financial instruments reflected in the Consolidated Balance Sheets approximated their respective fair values except for the following instruments:



	September 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
	(in millions)
Long-term debt	$	666.3	$	698.1	$	464.9	$	462.1

September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016

Carrying
Value

Fair
Value

Carrying
Value

Fair
Value
(in millions)
Long-term debt $ 560.6
$ 587.1
$ 425.0
$ 439.1
Notes payable to GST $ —
$ —
$ 295.9
$ 302.7

The fair values for long-term debt are based on quoted market prices for identical liabilities, but these ~~would be~~are considered Level 2 computations because the market is not active. ~~The notes payable to GST computations would be considered Level 2 since they are based on rates available to us for debt with similar terms and maturities.~~

~~Assets measured on a nonrecurring basis~~

~~Long-lived Assets~~. We review the carrying amounts of long-lived assets when certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. In consideration of the poor performance of the ATDynamics ("ATD") business, an asset group in the Stemco division of our Sealing Products segment, for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 and significantly lowered expectations for the fourth quarter forecast and the budget for fiscal year 2018, we determined that a test of ATD's recoverability was required.

An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of the asset group is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. We estimated the fair values of assets subject to long-lived asset impairment based on our own judgments about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets. In doing so, we used an income approach based upon discounted cash flows. The key assumptions used for the discounted cash flow approach include expected cash flows based on internal business plans, projected growth rates, discount rates, and royalty rates for certain intangible assets. We classified these fair value measurements as Level 3.

As a result of this test, certain of ATD's definite-lived intangible assets were determined to be impaired, and were valued in total at $1.7 million, resulting in an impairment loss of $10.1 million, which equaled the excess of these assets' net book value at September 30, 2017 over their fair value. The loss is reflected in other expense (operating) in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

~~Investment in GST and OldCo.~~ ~~As discussed further in Note 2 -~~ "Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC, Garrison Litigation Management Group, Ltd., and OldCo, LLC - Reconsolidation," the transaction to reconsolidate GST and OldCo into our reported financial results involved the measurement of the fair value of our investment in GST and OldCo as of July 31, 2017. The transaction is accounted for under the authoritative guidance for business combinations, and the investment's fair value of $485.2 million at this date is the deemed purchase price.

The fair value was determined using a combination of a market approach based upon a multiple of GST and OldCo's trailing forecasted financial performance for fiscal 2017, and an income approach based upon discounted cash flows. The key assumptions used for the discounted cash flow approach include expected cash flows based on internal business plans,

~~projected growth rates and discount rates. As a result, the valuation of the investment in GST is considered Level 3 due to the absence of quoted market prices or observable inputs.~~


16.	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component (after tax) for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2017~~2019 are as follows:


(in millions)	Unrealized Translation Adjustments			Pension and Other Postretirement Plans			Total			Unrealized Translation Adjustments			Pension and Other Postretirement Plans			Total
Beginning balance	$	(7.8	)	$	(47.7	)	$	(55.5	)	$	(8.8	)	$	(44.0	)	$	(52.8	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	3.4			—			3.4			3.9			—			3.9
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss	—			1.3			1.3			—			1.3			1.3
Net current-period other comprehensive income	3.4			1.3			4.7
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)										3.9			1.3			5.2
Ending balance	$	(4.4	)	$	(46.4	)	$	(50.8	)	$	(4.9	)	$	(42.7	)	$	(47.6	)

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component (after tax) for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2016~~2018 are as follows:



(in millions)	Unrealized Translation Adjustments			Pension and Other Postretirement Plans			Total
Beginning balance	$	(9.0	)	$	(39.5	)	$	(48.5	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	3.0			(2.0		)	1.0
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss	—			10.8			10.8
Net current-period other comprehensive income	3.0			8.8			11.8
Ending balance	$	(6.0	)	$	(30.7	)	$	(36.7	)

(in millions)
Unrealized
Translation
Adjustments

Pension and
Other
Postretirement
Plans
Total
Beginning balance $ (9.0 ) $ (47.1 ) $ (56.1 )
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (0.4 ) —
(0.4 )
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss —
1.0
1.0
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss) (0.4 ) 1.0
0.6
Ending balance $ (9.4 ) $ (46.1 ) $ (55.5 )

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component (after tax) for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2019 are as follows:



(in millions)	Unrealized Translation Adjustments			Pension and Other Postretirement Plans			Total
Beginning balance	$	(10.6	)	$	(34.9	)	$	(45.5	)
Adoption of new accounting standard	—			(11.5		)	(11.5		)
Adjusted beginning balance	(10.6		)	(46.4		)	(57.0		)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	5.7			—			5.7
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss	—			3.7			3.7
Net current-period other comprehensive income	5.7			3.7			9.4
Ending balance	$	(4.9	)	$	(42.7	)	$	(47.6	)

(in millions)
Unrealized
Translation
Adjustments

Pension and
Other
Postretirement
Plans
Total
Beginning balance $ (21.2 ) $ (49.7 ) $ (70.9 )
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications 16.8
—
16.8
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss —
3.3
3.3
Net current-period other comprehensive income 16.8
3.3
20.1
Ending balance $ (4.4 ) $ (46.4 ) $ (50.8 )

Changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component (after tax) for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~2018 are as follows:



(in millions)	Unrealized Translation Adjustments			Pension and Other Postretirement Plans			Total
Beginning balance	$	(6.8	)	$	(41.6	)	$	(48.4	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	0.8			(2.0		)	(1.2		)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss	—			12.9			12.9
Net current-period other comprehensive income	0.8			10.9			11.7
Ending balance	$	(6.0	)	$	(30.7	)	$	(36.7	)

(in millions)
Unrealized
Translation
Adjustments

Pension and
Other
Postretirement
Plans
Total
Beginning balance $ (4.9 ) $ (49.2 ) $ (54.1 )
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (4.3 ) —
(4.3 )
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss (0.2 ) 3.1
2.9
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss) (4.5 ) 3.1
(1.4 )
Ending balance $ (9.4 ) $ (46.1 ) $ (55.5 )

Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 are as follows:


Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components	Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss						Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss						Affected Statement of Operations Caption	Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss												Affected Statement of Operations Caption
	Quarters Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,							Quarters Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in millions)	2017			2016			2017			2016				2019			2018			2019			2018
Amortization of pension and other postretirement plans:
Pension and other postretirement plans adjustments:
Actuarial losses	$	1.8		$	1.7		$	5.4		$	5.1		(1)	$	1.7		$	1.1		$	5.0		$	4.0		(1)
Prior service costs	0.2			—			0.2			—			(1)	0.1			0.1			0.2			0.2			(1)
Settlement loss														—			12.8			—			12.8			(1)
Total before tax	2.0			1.7			5.6			5.1				$	1.8		$	14.0		$	5.2		$	17.0		Income before income taxes
Tax benefit	(0.7		)	(0.7		)	(2.3		)	(2.0		)	Income tax expense	(0.5		)	(3.2		)	(1.5		)	(4.1		)	Income tax expense
Net of tax	$	1.3		$	1.0		$	3.3		$	3.1			$	1.3		$	10.8		$	3.7		$	12.9		Net income (loss)
Release of unrealized currency translation adjustment upon sale of investment in foreign entity, net of tax	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(0.2	)	Other non-operating expense


(1)	These accumulated other comprehensive ~~income~~loss components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. As these are components of net periodic pension cost other than service cost, the affected Statement of Operations caption is other (non-operating) expense (See Note ~~12,~~11, “Pensions and Postretirement ~~Benefits”~~Benefits” for additional details).


17.	Commitments and Contingencies

General

A detailed description of environmental ~~asbestos~~ and other legal matters relating to certain of our subsidiaries is included in this section. In addition to the matters noted herein, we are from time to time subject to, and are presently involved in, other litigation and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe the outcome of such other litigation and legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Expenses for administrative and legal proceedings are recorded when incurred.

Environmental

Our facilities and operations are subject to federal, state and local environmental and occupational health and safety requirements of the U.S. and foreign countries. We take a proactive approach in our efforts to comply with environmental, health and safety laws as they relate to our manufacturing operations and in proposing and implementing any remedial plans that may be necessary. We also regularly conduct comprehensive environmental, health and safety audits at our facilities to maintain compliance and improve operational efficiency.

Although we believe past operations were in substantial compliance with the then applicable regulations, we or one or more of our subsidiaries are involved with various remediation activities at 1521 sites. At 16 of these sites, ~~where~~ the future cost per site for us or our subsidiary is expected to exceed $100,000. Of these 21 sites, 18 are sites where we or one or more of our subsidiaries formerly conducted business operations but no longer do, and 3 are sites where we conduct manufacturing operations. Investigations have been completed for 1116 sites and are in progress at the other 45 sites. Our costs at 14 of the 1521 sites relate to remediation projects for soil ~~and~~and/or groundwater contamination at or near former operating facilities that were sold or closed.

Our policy is to accrue environmental investigation and remediation costs when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. The measurement of the liability is based on an evaluation of currently available facts with respect to each individual situation and takes into consideration factors such as existing technology, presently enacted laws and regulations and prior experience ~~of the Company and engaged specialists~~ in the remediation of similar contaminated sites. Liabilities are established for all sites based on these factors. As assessments and remediation progress at individual sites, these liabilities are reviewed ~~at least once a quarter at the end of each quarter~~periodically and adjusted to reflect additional technical data and ~~additional~~ legal ~~information available.~~information. As of September 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016~~2018, we had accrued liabilities of aggregating $~~24.8~~34.6 million and $~~23.1~~31.1 million, respectively, for estimated future expenditures relating to environmental contingencies. These amounts have been recorded on an undiscounted basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Given the uncertainties regarding the status of laws, regulations, enforcement policies, the impact of other parties potentially being fully or partially liable, technology and information related to individual sites, we do not believe it is possible to develop an estimate of the range of reasonably possible environmental loss in excess of our recorded liabilities.

because of the inherent uncertainties in evaluating environmental exposures due to unknown and changing conditions, changing government regulations and legal standards regarding liability.

Cooperating Parties Group but remains a party to the May 2007 Administrative Order on Consent. The RI/FS was completed and submitted to the EPA at the end of April 2015. The RI/FS recommends a targeted dredge and cap remedy with monitored natural recovery and adaptive management for the Lower Passaic River Study Area. The cost of such remedy is estimated to be $726 million. Previously, on April 11, 2014, the EPA released its Focused Feasibility Study (the “FFS”) with its proposed plan for remediating the lower 8 miles of the Lower Passaic River Study Area. The FFS calls for bank-to-bank dredging and capping of the riverbed of that portion of the river and estimates a range of the present value of aggregate remediation costs of approximately $953 million to approximately $1.73 billion, although estimates of the costs and the timing of costs are inherently imprecise. On March 3, 2016, the EPA issued the final Record of Decision (ROD) as to the remedy for the lower 8 miles of the Lower Passaic River Study Area, with the maximum estimated cost being reduced by the EPA from $1.73 billion to $1.38 billion, primarily due to a reduction in the amount of cubic yards of material that will be dredged. In October 2016, Occidental Chemical Corporation, the successor to the entity that operated the Diamond Alkali chemical manufacturing facility, reached an agreement with the EPA to develop the design for this proposed remedy at an estimated cost of $165 million. The EPA has estimated that it will take approximately four years to develop this design.

No final allocations of responsibility have been made among the numerous PRPs that have received notices from the EPA, there are numerous identified PRPs that have not yet received PRP notices from the EPA, and there are likely many PRPs that have not yet been identified. In September 2017, EPA hired a third-party allocator to develop an allocation of costs among a large number of the parties identified by EPA as having potential responsibility, including the Company. On June 30, 2018, Occidental Chemical Corporation sued over 120 parties, including the Company, in the United States District Court for New Jersey seeking recovery of response costs under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA").

Based on our evaluation of the site, during 2014 we accrued a liability of $3.5 million related to environmental remediation costs associated with the lower 8 miles of the Lower Passaic River Study Area, which is our estimate of the low end of a range of reasonably possible costs, with no estimate within the range being a better estimate than the minimum. Since 2016, we incurred $0.7 million in costs related to this matter. Our future remediation costs could be significantly greater than the $2.8 million remaining accrual at September 30, 2019. With respect to the upper 9 miles of the Lower Passaic River Study Area, we are unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible costs.

Another such matter involves the Onondaga Lake Superfund Site (the “Onondaga Site”) located near Syracuse, New York, which is also included in the 21 sites referred to above. Crucible operated a steel mill facility adjacent to Onondaga Lake from 1911 to 1983. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“NYSDEC”) has contacted us and EnPro Holdings, as well as other parties, demanding reimbursement of unquantified environmental response costs incurred by NYSDEC and the EPA at the Onondaga Site. NYSDEC and EPA have alleged that contamination from the Crucible facility contributed to the need for environmental response actions at the Onondaga Site. We have also received notice from the Natural Resource Trustees for the Onondaga Lake Superfund Site (which are the U.S. Department of Interior, NYSDEC, and the Onondaga Nation) alleging that EnPro Holdings is considered to be a potentially responsible party for natural resource damages at the Onondaga Site. In addition, Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”), which has undertaken certain remediation activities at the Onondaga Site under the supervision of NYSDEC and the EPA, has informed us that it has claims against EnPro Holdings related to investigation and remediation at the Onondaga Site. We have entered into tolling agreements with NYSDEC, the EPA and Honeywell. On May 4, 2016, we received from Honeywell a summary of its claims, including a portion of its costs for the remediation of the Onondaga Site in accordance with its settlement with NYSDEC and EPA. Based on limited information available with respect to estimated remediation costs and the respective allocation of responsibility for remediation among potentially responsible parties, we previously were unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss associated with Crucible’s activities that may have affected the Onondaga Site.

After continued discussions with Honeywell, an agreement-in-principle has been reached to settle Honeywell's claim for $10 million in exchange for a full release of any and all claims based on Crucible's alleged contamination of Onondaga Lake. In light of this tentative settlement, for the third quarter of 2019, we increased our reserve for this matter by $3.5 million to reflect an aggregate reserve of $10 million. It is anticipated that the settlement will be completed and paid in the first quarter of 2020.

Except with respect to specific Crucible environmental matters for which we have accrued a portion of the liability set forth above, including the Lower Passaic River Study Area and the Onondaga site, we are unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss related to any other contingent environmental liability based on our prior ownership of Crucible.

See the section entitled “Crucible Steel Corporation a/k/a Crucible, Inc.” in this footnote for additional information.

In addition to the Crucible environmental matters discussed above, EnPro Holdings received a notice from the EPA dated February 19, 2014 asserting that EnPro Holdings is a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive

Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA") as the successor to a former operator in 1954 and 1955 of 2 uranium mines in Arizona. On October 15, 2015, EnPro Holdings received another notice from the EPA asserting that it is a potentially responsible party as the successor to the former operator of six additional uranium mines in Arizona. In 2015, we reserved $1.1 million for the minimum amount of probable loss associated with the first 2 mines identified by the EPA, including the cost of the investigative work to be conducted at such mines. During 2016, we reserved an additional $1.1 million for the minimum amount of probable loss associated with the 6 additional mines, which includes estimated costs of investigative work to be conducted at the 8 mines. We entered into an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Interim Removal Action with the EPA effective November 7, 2017 for the performance of this work. In the third quarter of 2017, we increased the reserve by $1.9 million to perform investigations required by the Settlement Agreement to determine the nature and extent of contamination at each site with the investigations anticipated to be completed by the end of 2020. In the fourth quarter of 2018, we increased the reserve by $1.0 million for the estimated reimbursement of the EPA's costs to oversee these investigations. The balance in the reserve as of September 30, 2019 is $2.2 million. We cannot at this time estimate a reasonably possible range of loss associated with remediation or other incremental costs related to these mines.

In connection with the former operation of a division of EnPro Holdings located in Water Valley, Mississippi, which was divested to BorgWarner, Inc. ("BorgWarner") in 1996, EnPro Holdings has been managing trichloroethylene soil and groundwater contamination at the site. In February 2016, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) issued an order against EnPro Holdings requiring evaluation of potential vapor intrusion into residential properties and commercial facilities located over the groundwater plume as well as requiring additional groundwater investigation and remediation. MDEQ performed the initial vapor intrusion investigations at certain residential and commercial sites, with the findings all being below the applicable screening level. In April 2016, the parties entered into a new order including negotiated time frames for groundwater remediation. Pursuant to that order, MDEQ performed a second round of vapor intrusion sampling beginning in August 2016. Results from sampling outside of three residences were above screening levels. Follow-up sampling directly underneath those residences (either sub-slab or in crawl spaces) were all below applicable screening levels. Two separate sampling events at another residence were also below applicable screening levels. Due to an increasing trend in vapor concentrations, MDEQ requested that we develop and implement initial corrective action measures to address vapor intrusion resulting from groundwater contamination in this residential area. These measures were developed and approved by MDEQ. Due to an inability to obtain access to private properties where the corrective action system was to be located, we developed an alternate remedial approach which has been approved by MDEQ. In addition, vapor intrusion sampling at the manufacturing facility owned by BorgWarner was conducted during the first quarter of 2017. The results showed exceedances of screening levels at various areas in the plant and exceedances of levels requiring responsive actions in a limited area of the plant.

Implementation of the immediate responsive actions has been completed and corrective action consisting of a permanent vapor intrusion remediation system became operational in May 2017 with further improvements made to the system in December 2017 and January 2018. Indoor air sampling is conducted at four locations biweekly and have been below levels requiring responsive action at three sampling locations since June 2017 and at all four locations since February 2018. We are also continuing soil and groundwater investigation work in the area inside the plant where the vapor intrusion remediation system is located and around the outside of the plant and implementing corrective action plans for both the contamination remaining at the plant as well as contamination that has migrated off-site. All of the work to be performed at the residential area, the plant and off-site is set forth in an agreed Order that we and MDEQ entered into on September 11, 2017.

During 2016, we established an additional $1.3 million reserve with respect to this matter. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we reserved an additional $5.7 million for further investigation, additional remediation, long-term monitoring costs, and legal fees to support regulatory compliance for the above noted actions. In the fourth quarter of 2018, we reserved an additional $3.5 million for additional remediation, long-term monitoring costs and legal fees to support regulatory compliance for the above noted activities. As the corrective actions are implemented and their performance monitored, further modifications to the remediation system at the site may be required which may result in additional costs beyond the current reserve.

On April 7, 2017, the State of Mississippi through its Attorney General filed suit against EnPro Holdings and Goodrich Corporation (EnPro's former corporate parent), in Mississippi Circuit Court in Yalobusha County seeking recovery of all costs and expenses to be incurred by the State in remediating the groundwater contamination, punitive damages and attorney’s fees. We are aggressively defending this case. The additional reserve established in the year ended December 31, 2017, noted above, does not include any estimate of contingent loss associated with this lawsuit other than due to remediation and other actions with respect to this site based on existing MDEQ orders described above. On January 31, 2019, some of these property owners (representing ownership of 27 residential, agricultural or commercial properties), Yalobusha County, and the Board of Trustees of the Yalobusha General Hospital filed suit against EnPro and Goodrich in Mississippi Circuit Court and Yalobusha County seeking recovery for alleged damage to their properties, including diminution in value, from groundwater contamination that has come onto their properties. These cases have been removed to the federal U.S. District Court and plaintiffs' challenge to such removal has been denied by the federal court. In addition, it is our understanding that other area homeowners, owners of

commercial facilities and possibly other private parties and individuals may be separately evaluating possible legal action relating to potential vapor intrusion and groundwater contamination.

In October 2019, mediation of the case filed by the property owners (representing ownership of the 27 residential, agricultural and commercial properties) was conducted. As a result of that mediation, the claims of all of the property owners were settled for current and estimated future payments of $3.0 million in the aggregate. In exchange for these payments, the litigation is to be dismissed with prejudice, each plaintiff will release any and all claims that were or could have been brought against EnPro, and each property owner will file in the real property records of Yalobusha County, Mississippi, a deed restriction required by MDEQ as part of EnPro's required remediation.

Mediation of the lawsuit brought by Yalobusha County and the Board of Trustees of the Yalobusha County General Hospital is scheduled to be held in December 2019.

In light of this settlement and the upcoming mediation, for the third quarter of 2019, we further increased our reserve for this matter, including the remediation matters described above, by $4.4 million to reflect an aggregate reserve of $7.5 million. Beyond this increase, we cannot estimate a reasonably possible range of loss from the remaining lawsuits or any potential additional legal actions at this time. Based upon limited information regarding any incremental remediation or other actions that may be required at the site, we cannot estimate a minimum loss or a reasonably possible range of loss related to this matter.

Crucible Steel Corporation a/k/a Crucible, Inc.

Crucible, which was engaged primarily in the manufacture and distribution of high technology specialty metal products, was a wholly owned subsidiary of EnPro Holdings until 1983 when its assets and liabilities were distributed to a new subsidiary, Crucible Materials Corporation. EnPro Holdings sold a majority of the outstanding shares of Crucible Materials Corporation in 1985 and divested its remaining minority interest in 2004. Crucible Materials Corporation filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in May 2009 and is no longer conducting operations.

We have certain ongoing obligations, which are included in other liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, including workers’ compensation, retiree medical and other retiree benefit matters, in addition to those mentioned previously related to EnPro Holding's period of ownership of Crucible. Based on EnPro Holding's prior ownership of Crucible, we may have certain additional contingent liabilities, including liabilities in one or more significant environmental matters included in the matters discussed in “Environmental” above. We are investigating these matters. Except with respect to those matters for which we have an accrued liability as discussed in "Environmental" above, we are unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss related to these contingent liabilities.

Warranties

We provide warranties on many of our products. The specific terms and conditions of these warranties vary depending on the product and the market in which the product is sold. We record a liability based upon estimates of the costs we may incur under our warranties after a review of historical warranty experience and information about specific warranty claims. Adjustments are made to the liability as claims data, historical experience, and trends result in changes to our estimate.

Changes in the product warranty liability for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 are as follows:



	2019			2018
	(in millions)
Balance at beginning of year	$	11.7		$	5.3
Net charges to expense	6.7			5.8
Settlements made	(4.7		)	(2.3		)
Balance at end of period	$	13.7		$	8.8

BorgWarner

financial matters on April 6, 2017. In the final report, the expert panel concluded that GGB France had a duty to notify BorgWarner regarding the change of source of raw material used in the bearings, but that the failure of the hydraulic control units was attributable to both the raw material supplier change and the insufficient design of the units by BorgWarner. The expert panel provided detail on a possible allocation of damages alleged to have been incurred by BorgWarner and its customer. Although the language of the report is not clear, the report appears to note a potential allocation of recoverable damages 65% to GGB and 35% to BorgWarner. It also indicates that, though it is for a court to ultimately determine, the aggregate damages to BorgWarner and its customer was in the range of 7.9 million EUR to 10.2 million EUR, with 1.8 million EUR to 2.1 million EUR of this range being for damages to BorgWarner and the remainder being for damages to its customer. The experts noted the lower end of the range as being more likely and noted a lack of sufficient evidence provided substantiating the customer's damages. Applying a 65% liability allocation to GGB to the total aggregate range yields a range of 5.1 million EUR to 6.6 million EUR. In the final report, the expert panel deferred to a court the determination of whether GGB France had breached its contractual obligations to BorgWarner. On October 25, 2017, BorgWarner initiated a legal proceeding against GGB with respect to this matter by filing a writ of claim with the Commercial Court of Brive, France. The parties have begun briefing their legal positions, and we expect court hearings to begin in late 2019 and a court ruling in early 2020.

We continue to believe that GGB France has valid factual and legal defenses to these claims and we are vigorously defending these claims. Among GGB France’s legal defenses are a contractual disclaimer of consequential damages, which, if controlling, would limit liability for consequential damages and provide for the replacement of the bearings at issue, at an aggregate replacement value we estimate to be approximately 0.4 million EUR; that the determination of any duty to notify of the change in the source of the raw material is a legal matter to be determined by the presiding court; and the insufficiency of evidence of damage to BorgWarner's customer provided to the expert panel. Based on the final report from the expert panel and GGB France's legal defenses described above, we estimate GGB France’s reasonably possible range of loss associated with this matter to be approximately 0.4 million EUR to 6.6 million EUR plus a potential undetermined amount of apportioned proceeding expenses, with no amount within the range being a better estimate than the minimum of the range. Accordingly, GGB France has retained the accrual of 0.4 million EUR associated with this matter, which was established in 2016.

Asbestos Insurance Matters

The historical business operations of certain of our subsidiaries resulted in a substantial volume of asbestos litigation in which plaintiffs alleged personal injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos fibers. In 2010, certain of these subsidiaries, including Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC ("GST"), filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina (the "Bankruptcy Court"). An additional subsidiary filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition with the Bankruptcy Court in 2017. The filings were part of a claims resolution process for an efficient and permanent resolution of all pending and future asbestos claims through court approval of a plan of reorganization to establish a facility to resolve and pay these asbestos claims.

These claims against GST and other subsidiaries were resolved pursuant to a joint plan of reorganization (the "Joint Plan") filed with the Bankruptcy Court which was consummated on July 29, 2017. Under the Joint Plan, GST and EnPro Holdings retained their rights to seek reimbursement under insurance policies for any amounts they have paid in the past to resolve asbestos claims, including contributions made to the asbestos claims resolution trust established under the Joint Plan (the "Trust"). These policies include a number of primary and excess general liability insurance policies that were purchased by EnPro Holdings and were in effect prior to January 1, 1976 (the “Pre-Garlock Coverage Block”). The policies provide coverage for “occurrences” happening during the policy periods and cover losses associated with product liability claims against EnPro Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries. Asbestos claims against GST are not covered under these policies because GST was not a subsidiary of EnPro Holdings prior to 1976. The Joint Plan provides that EnPro Holdings may retain the first $25 million of any settlements and judgments collected for non-GST asbestos claims related to insurance policies in the Pre-Garlock Coverage Block and EnPro Holdings and the Trust will share equally in any settlements and judgments EnPro Holdings may collect in excess of $25 million. To date, EnPro Holdings has collected almost $22 million in settlements for non-GST asbestos claims from the Pre-Garlock Coverage Block and anticipates further collections once the Trust begins making claims payments.

As of September 30, 2019, approximately $6.7 million of available products hazard limits or insurance receivables existed under primary and excess general liability insurance policies other than the Pre-Garlock Coverage Block (the "Garlock Coverage Block") from solvent carriers with investment grade ratings, which we believe is available to cover GST asbestos claims payments and certain expense payments, including contributions to the Trust. We consider such amount of available insurance coverage under the Garlock Coverage Block to be of high quality because the insurance policies are written or guaranteed by U.S.-based carriers whose credit rating by S&P is investment grade (BBB-) or better, and whose AM Best rating is excellent (A-) or better. The remaining $6.7 million is available to pending and estimated future claims. There are specific agreements in place with carriers regarding the remaining available coverage. Based on those agreements and the terms of the policies in place and prior decisions concerning coverage, we believe that all of the $6.7 million of insurance proceeds will ultimately be collected, although there can be no assurance that the insurance companies will make the payments as and when

due. Assuming the insurers pay according to the agreements and policies, we anticipate that $4.2 million will be collected in the fourth quarter of 2019 and $2.5 million will be collected in 2020.

We also believe that EnPro Holdings will bill, and could collect over time, as much as $10 million of insurance coverage for non-GST asbestos claims to reimburse it for Trust payments to non-GST Trust claimants. After EnPro Holdings collects the first approximately $3 million of that coverage, remaining collections for non-GST asbestos claims from the Pre-Garlock Coverage Block will be shared equally with the Trust.

GST has received $8.8 million of insurance recoveries from insolvent carriers since 2007, and may receive additional payments from insolvent carriers in the future. No anticipated insolvent carrier collections are included in the $6.7 million of anticipated collections. The insurance available to cover current and future asbestos claims is from comprehensive general liability policies that cover EnPro Holdings and certain of its other subsidiaries in addition to GST for periods prior to 1985 and therefore could be subject to potential competing claims of other covered subsidiaries and their assignees.


18.	Supplemental Guarantor Financial Information

The following tables present condensed consolidating financial information for EnPro Industries, Inc. (the "Parent"), the Guarantor Subsidiaries on a combined basis, the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries on a combined basis and the eliminations necessary to arrive at our consolidated results. The consolidating financial information reflects our investments in subsidiaries using the equity method of accounting. These tables are not intended to present our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition for any purpose other than to comply with the specific requirements for subsidiary guarantor reporting.

ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

Quarter Ended September 30, 2019

(in millions)



				Guarantor			Non-guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	266.3		$	143.4		$	(36.7	)	$	373.0
Cost of sales	—			197.7			97.0			(36.7		)	258.0
Gross profit	—			68.6			46.4			—			115.0
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	11.5			45.1			27.5			—			84.1
Other	—			1.4			0.9			—			2.3
Total operating expenses	11.5			46.5			28.4			—			86.4
Operating income (loss)	(11.5		)	22.1			18.0			—			28.6
Interest income (expense), net	(3.0		)	(1.0		)	0.2			—			(3.8		)
Other expense	—			(24.5		)	(0.1		)	—			(24.6		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	(14.5		)	(3.4		)	18.1			—			0.2
Income tax benefit (expense)	—			4.3			(6.0		)	—			(1.7		)
Income (loss) before equity in earnings of subsidiaries	(14.5		)	0.9			12.1			—			(1.5		)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net of tax	13.0			12.1			—			(25.1		)	—
Net income (loss)	$	(1.5	)	$	13.0		$	12.1		$	(25.1	)	$	(1.5	)
Comprehensive income	$	3.7		$	8.0		$	5.8		$	(13.8	)	$	3.7

ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

Quarter Ended September 30, 2018

(in millions)



				Guarantor			Non-guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	279.3		$	153.2		$	(44.3	)	$	388.2
Cost of sales	—			203.6			104.8			(44.3		)	264.1
Gross profit	—			75.7			48.4			—			124.1
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	11.3			39.1			28.5			—			78.9
Other	(0.1		)	0.8			0.3			—			1.0
Total operating expenses	11.2			39.9			28.8			—			79.9
Operating income (loss)	(11.2		)	35.8			19.6			—			44.2
Interest income (expense), net	(5.4		)	(0.6		)	0.1			—			(5.9		)
Other expense	—			(13.7		)	(0.1		)	—			(13.8		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	(16.6		)	21.5			19.6			—			24.5
Income tax benefit (expense)	2.6			2.2			(5.1		)	—			(0.3		)
Income (loss) before equity in earnings of subsidiaries	(14.0		)	23.7			14.5			—			24.2
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net of tax	38.2			14.5			—			(52.7		)	—
Net income	$	24.2		$	38.2		$	14.5		$	(52.7	)	$	24.2
Comprehensive income	$	36.0		$	51.7		$	19.2		$	(70.9	)	$	36.0

ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019

(in millions)



				Guarantor			Non-guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	799.8		$	440.2		$	(119.7	)	$	1,120.3
Cost of sales	—			587.4			299.4			(119.7		)	767.1
Gross profit	—			212.4			140.8			—			353.2
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	35.7			134.3			85.7			—			255.7
Other	0.4			2.0			2.3			—			4.7
Total operating expenses	36.1			136.3			88.0			—			260.4
Operating income (loss)	(36.1		)	76.1			52.8			—			92.8
Interest income (expense), net	(9.4		)	(3.9		)	0.8			—			(12.5		)
Other expense	—			(27.1		)	(0.2		)	—			(27.3		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	(45.5		)	45.1			53.4			—			53.0
Income tax benefit (expense)	3.8			(4.1		)	(17.2		)	—			(17.5		)
Income (loss) before equity in earnings of subsidiaries	(41.7		)	41.0			36.2			—			35.5
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net of tax	77.2			36.2			—			(113.4		)	—
Net income	$	35.5		$	77.2		$	36.2		$	(113.4	)	$	35.5
Comprehensive income	$	44.9		$	73.2		$	32.6		$	(105.8	)	$	44.9

ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

(in millions)



				Guarantor			Non-guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
Net sales	$	—		$	810.9		$	465.0		$	(125.3	)	$	1,150.6
Cost of sales	—			603.4			307.5			(125.3		)	785.6
Gross profit	—			207.5			157.5			—			365.0
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	34.7			134.7			91.0			—			260.4
Other	—			5.5			0.8			—			6.3
Total operating expenses	34.7			140.2			91.8			—			266.7
Operating income (loss)	(34.7		)	67.3			65.7			—			98.3
Interest income (expense), net	(17.6		)	(3.7		)	0.5			—			(20.8		)
Other expense	—			(14.1		)	(0.3		)	—			(14.4		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	(52.3		)	49.5			65.9			—			63.1
Income tax benefit (expense)	10.2			(8.0		)	(18.6		)	—			(16.4		)
Income (loss) before equity in earnings of subsidiaries	(42.1		)	41.5			47.3			—			46.7
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net of tax	88.8			47.3			—			(136.1		)	—
Net income	$	46.7		$	88.8		$	47.3		$	(136.1	)	$	46.7
Comprehensive income	$	58.4		$	96.2		$	43.8		$	(140.0	)	$	58.4

ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019

(in millions)



				Guarantor			Non-guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES	$	83.1		$	30.2		$	55.9		$	(18.5	)	$	150.7
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	—			(17.0		)	(6.8		)	—			(23.8		)
Proceeds from sale of business	—			3.6			—			—			3.6
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired	—			(271.2		)	(39.2		)	—			(310.4		)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment				0.4			0.4			—			0.8
Other	—			(2.6		)	(0.3		)	—			(2.9		)
Net cash used in investing activities	—			(286.8		)	(45.9		)	—			(332.7		)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net payments on loans between subsidiaries	(47.4		)	52.5			(5.1		)	—			—
Intercompany dividends	—			—			(18.5		)	18.5
Proceeds from debt	—			566.9			—			—			566.9
Repayments of debt	—			(365.1		)	—			—			(365.1		)
Repurchase of common stock	(15.0		)							—			(15.0		)
Dividends paid	(15.7		)							—			(15.7		)
Other	(5.0		)	—			—			—			(5.0		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(83.1		)	254.3			(23.6		)	18.5			166.1
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	—			—			(1.6		)	—			(1.6		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	—			(2.3		)	(15.2		)	—			(17.5		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	—			2.3			127.3			—			129.6
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	—		$	—		$	112.1		$	—		$	112.1

ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018

(in millions)



				Guarantor			Non-guarantor
	Parent			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES	$	69.5		$	145.6		$	57.6		$	(114.3	)	$	158.4
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	—			(37.5		)	(8.2		)	—			(45.7		)
Receipts from derivative contracts	9.3			—			—			—			9.3
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment	—			26.0			0.6			—			26.6
Other	—			(1.8		)	(0.2		)	—			(2.0		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	9.3			(13.3		)	(7.8		)	—			(11.8		)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net payments on loans between subsidiaries	(8.0		)	8.4			(0.4		)	—			—
Intercompany dividends	—			—			(114.3		)	114.3			—
Proceeds from debt	—			454.9			—			—			454.9
Repayments of debt	—			(594.4		)	—			—			(594.4		)
Repurchase of common stock	(50.0		)	—			—			—			(50.0		)
Dividends paid	(15.3		)	—			—			—			(15.3		)
Other	(5.5		)	(1.2		)	—			—			(6.7		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(78.8		)	(132.3		)	(114.7		)	114.3			(211.5		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	—			—			(4.5		)	—			(4.5		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	—			—			(69.4		)	—			(69.4		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	—			—			189.3			—			189.3
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	—		$	—		$	119.9		$	—		$	119.9

ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

As of September 30, 2019

(in millions)



			Guarantor		Non-guarantor
	Parent		Subsidiaries		Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—	$	—	$	112.1	$	—		$	112.1
Accounts receivable, net	0.2		200.3		86.6		—			287.1
Intercompany receivables	—		16.8		11.4		(28.2		)	—
Inventories	—		153.3		72.2		—			225.5
Income tax receivable	27.3		0.3		10.9		—			38.5
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	5.7		22.1		6.6		—			34.4
Total current assets	33.2		392.8		299.8		(28.2		)	697.6
Property, plant and equipment, net	—		195.6		89.3		—			284.9
Goodwill	—		291.1		193.9		—			485.0
Other intangible assets, net	—		232.7		261.6		—			494.3
Intercompany receivables	—		2.8		5.1		(7.9		)	—
Investment in subsidiaries	1,218.7		665.4		—		(1,884.1		)	—
Other assets	31.9		39.6		36.4		—			107.9
Total assets	$	1,283.8	$	1,820.0	$	886.1	$	(1,920.2	)	$	2,069.7
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	—	$	0.4	$	—	$	—		$	0.4
Accounts payable	2.0		71.4		32.2		—			105.6
Intercompany payables	—		11.4		16.8		(28.2		)	—
Accrued expenses	20.5		112.9		67.4		—			200.8
Total current liabilities	22.5		196.1		116.4		(28.2		)	306.8
Long-term debt	345.2		320.4		0.3		—			665.9
Intercompany payables	3.7		1.4		2.8		(7.9		)	—
Other liabilities	36.0		55.4		101.2		—			192.6
Total liabilities	407.4		573.3		220.7		(36.1		)	1,165.3
Redeemable non-controlling interest	—		28.0		—		—			28.0
Shareholders’ equity	876.4		1,218.7		665.4		(1,884.1		)	876.4
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,283.8	$	1,820.0	$	886.1	$	(1,920.2	)	$	2,069.7

ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

As of December 31, 2018

(in millions)



			Guarantor		Non-guarantor
	Parent		Subsidiaries		Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	—	$	2.3	$	127.3	$	—		$	129.6
Accounts receivable, net	—		210.3		76.3		—			286.6
Intercompany receivables	—		19.0		8.9		(27.9		)	—
Inventories	—		155.3		77.8		—			233.1
Income tax receivable	42.9		0.3		6.4		—			49.6
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	4.9		20.3		8.0		—			33.2
Total current assets	47.8		407.5		304.7		(27.9		)	732.1
Property, plant and equipment, net	2.2		209.7		89.3		—			301.2
Goodwill	—		261.0		72.7		—			333.7
Other intangible assets, net	—		242.2		55.1		—			297.3
Intercompany receivables	—		53.9		—		(53.9		)	—
Investment in subsidiaries	1,246.4		387.7		—		(1,634.1		)	—
Other assets	13.6		25.3		12.6		—			51.5
Total assets	$	1,310.0	$	1,587.3	$	534.4	$	(1,715.9	)	$	1,715.8
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	2.1	$	0.3	$	—	$	—		$	2.4
Accounts payable	2.1		99.0		38.1		—			139.2
Intercompany payables	—		8.9		19.0		(27.9		)	—
Accrued expenses	13.9		82.8		53.7		—			150.4
Total current liabilities	18.1		191.0		110.8		(27.9		)	292.0
Long-term debt	345.0		117.5		—		—			462.5
Intercompany payables	51.1		—		2.8		(53.9		)	—
Other liabilities	38.1		32.4		33.1		—			103.6
Total liabilities	452.3		340.9		146.7		(81.8		)	858.1
Shareholders’ equity	857.7		1,246.4		387.7		(1,634.1		)	857.7
Total liabilities and equity	$	1,310.0	$	1,587.3	$	534.4	$	(1,715.9	)	$	1,715.8


Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected our financial condition, cash flows and operating results during the periods included in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related notes. You should read this in conjunction with those financial statements and the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

Forward-Looking Information

This quarterly report on Form 10-Q includes statements that reflect projections or expectations of the future financial condition, results of operations and business of EnPro that are subject to risk and uncertainty. We believe those statements to be “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. When used in this report, the words “may,” “hope,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “likely,” and other expressions generally identify forward-looking statements.

We cannot guarantee actual results or events will not differ materially from those projected, estimated, assigned or anticipated in any of the forward-looking statements contained in this report. Important factors that could result in those differences include those specifically noted in the forward-looking statements and those identified in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, which include:

general economic conditions in the markets served by our businesses, some of which are cyclical and experience periodic downturns;

prices and availability of raw materials;

the impact of fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

unanticipated delays or problems in introducing new products;

the incurrence of contractual penalties for the late delivery of long lead-time products;

announcements by competitors of new products, services or technological innovations;

timely consummation of announced acquisitions;

changes in our pricing policies or the pricing policies of our competitors; and

the amount of any payments required to satisfy contingent liabilities, including those related to discontinued operations of our predecessors, including liabilities for certain products, environmental matters, employee benefit obligations and other matters.

We caution our shareholders not to place undue reliance on these statements, which speak only as of the date on which such statements were made.

Whenever you read or hear any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements attributed to us or any person acting on our behalf, you should keep in mind the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

Overview and Outlook

Overview. We design, develop, manufacture, service and market proprietary engineered industrial products. We have 51 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, including the United States.

We manage our business as three segments: a Sealing Products segment, an Engineered Products segment, and a Power Systems segment.

including chemical and petrochemical processing, petroleum extraction and refining, pulp and paper processing, power generation, food and pharmaceutical processing, primary metal manufacturing, mining, water and waste treatment, heavy-duty trucking, aerospace, medical, filtration and semiconductor fabrication. In many of these industries, performance and durability are vital for safety and environmental protection. Many of our products are used in highly demanding applications, e.g., where extreme temperatures, extreme pressures, corrosive environments, strict tolerances, and/or worn equipment make product performance difficult. In addition to these products, we also provide cleaning and refurbishment services for critical components and assemblies used in state-of-the-art semiconductor equipment. The equipment serviced is used to produce advanced microchips for smartphones, autonomous vehicles, high-speed wireless connectivity, artificial intelligence, and other applications.

Our Engineered Products segment includes operations that design, manufacture and sell self-lubricating, non-rolling, metal-polymer, solid polymer and filament wound bearing products, aluminum blocks for hydraulic applications and precision engineered components and lubrication systems for reciprocating compressors. These products are used in a wide range of applications, including the automotive, pharmaceutical, pulp and paper, natural gas, health, power generation, machine tools, air treatment, refining, petrochemical and general industrial markets.

Our Power Systems segment designs, manufactures, sells and services heavy-duty, medium-speed diesel, natural gas and dual fuel reciprocating engines, including parts and services. The United States government and the general markets for marine propulsion, power generation, and pump and compressor applications use these products and services.

In May 2014, our Fairbanks Morse division and a consortium partner entered into a multi-year, Euro-denominated contractual arrangement with Electricite de France (“EDF”) to supply 23 3.5 MWe opposed-piston, diesel engine-generator sets to EDF for emergency backup power at 20 of EDF’s nuclear power plants in France. From the date the contract was signed until the end of the first quarter of 2015, the U.S. Dollar strengthened significantly against the Euro, resulting in total U.S. Dollar equivalent revenues, calculated at the exchange rate in effect at the end of the first quarter of 2015, falling below total projected U.S. Dollar costs for the EDF contract, and for the first quarter of 2015 we recorded a loss provision on the contract as a result of the effect of foreign exchange rates. This evaluation was based upon the 2015 first-quarter-end U.S. Dollar to Euro exchange rate of $1.10 compared to an exchange rate of $1.36 when the contract was signed. We have not entered into any transactions to hedge the impact of future foreign exchange rate changes on this contract. The evaluation of the impact of exchange rates on the contract is updated on a quarterly basis for the duration of the contract, with the amount of any change in a quarter in the impact of exchange rates on the loss provision affecting segment profit of the Power Systems segment for the quarter by the amount of such change.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we recognized a $4.1 million increase to the loss provision. We experienced $2.1 million of unfavorability related to the weakening of the Euro versus the U.S. Dollar during the period, a $2.6 million increase in projected total project costs, partially offset by $0.6 million increase in total contract revenues resulting from a favorable adjustment to future billing amounts as a result of a contractual cost indices adjustment. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we recognized a $1.1 million increase to the loss provision. During this period, we experienced $2.1 million of unfavorability related to the weakening of the Euro versus the U.S. Dollar during the period, a $0.9 million increase in total project costs, partially offset by a $1.9 million increase in total contract revenues resulting from a favorable adjustment to future billing amounts as a result of a contractual cost indices adjustment. At September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the cumulative program loss recognized was $20.9 million and $13.7 million, respectively.

As of September 30, 2019, Fairbanks Morse had completed the model unit and shipped 16 of the remaining 20 production engine-generator sets under the EDF contract. We expect to ship the remaining 4 production engine-generator sets by January 2020 and the 2 spares in 2020. The contract includes contractual penalties for late delivery and our profitability under the contract could be further adversely affected to the extent any penalties apply to any late deliveries. In addition, our profitability could be adversely affected if we do not realize certain anticipated internal efficiency gains while performing under the contract, additional service is required on delivered engine-generator sets for which Fairbanks Morse may not be compensated under the contract, or other claims are made with respect to the contract.

On July 2, 2019, we acquired The Aseptic Group (comprising Aseptic Process Equipment SAS and Aseptic Services SARL). Headquartered in Limonest, France, The Aseptic Group distributes, designs, and manufactures aseptic fluid transfer products for the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industries. The Aseptic Group has been included as part of EnPro’s Garlock division within the Sealing Products segment.

On September 25, 2019, we acquired the outstanding equity securities of LeanTeq, LLC and LeanTeq Co., Ltd. (collectively "LeanTeq"), a privately-held, Taiwan-based company. LeanTeq provides refurbishment services for critical components and assemblies used in state-of-the-art semiconductor equipment. The equipment is used to produce the latest and most technologically advanced microchips for smartphones, autonomous vehicles, high-speed wireless connectivity (5G), artificial intelligence, and other leading-edge applications. LeanTeq has been included as part of EnPro's Technetics division within the Sealing Products segment.

LeanTeq was founded in 2011, is headquartered in Taoyuan City, Taiwan, and has two locations in Taiwan and one in the United States (Silicon Valley). LeanTeq partners closely with original equipment manufacturers throughout the development and production lifecycle to achieve Process of Record qualifications, enabling long-term, recurring aftermarket revenue. Aftermarket refurbishment services have historically represented approximately 65% of LeanTeqs total sales. LeanTeq’s suite of services includes cleaning, coating, analytical testing, inspection and verification, kit assembly, failure analysis, and other value-added services.

In connection with the consummation of the LeanTeq acquisition, two LeanTeq equity holders who are managers of LeanTeq (the “LeanTeq Executives”) applied approximately 10% of the total transaction consideration paid in the acquisition to purchase equity interests of our subsidiary (the “Acquisition Subsidiary”) acquiring LeanTeq pursuant to an agreement (the “LLC Agreement”) entered into upon the closing of the LeanTeq acquisition (the “Closing”). Under the LLC Agreement, each of the LeanTeq Executives will also have the right to sell to us, and we will have the right to purchase from each of the LeanTeq Executives, the LeanTeq Executive’s equity interests in the Acquisition Subsidiary, following the third anniversary of the Closing, a change-of-control of the Acquisition Subsidiary or EnPro, dissolution of the Acquisition Subsidiary, termination of employment, death or disability of the LeanTeq Executive, and certain other circumstances such as a dispute regarding our performance of the LLC Agreement. The consideration, which is payable in two installments, in such purchase and sale arrangements is generally to be based upon a multiple of twelve-month adjusted EBITDA based upon certain financial metrics of the Acquisition Subsidiary, plus cash and less indebtedness of the Acquisition Subsidiary prior to the relevant installment payment, subject to certain adjustments dependent upon the circumstances of the purchase and sale.

The combined purchase price of the LeanTeq and The Aseptic Group acquisitions was approximately $338.4 million, net of cash acquired and including the equity rollover from the LeanTeq Executives.

In September 2019, we recorded a $15.2 million pre-tax loss related to the sale of certain assets and certain liabilities of our brake products business unit, a supplier of steel brake shoes to the North American heavy-duty truck market, located in Rome, Georgia and included in our Sealing Product segment. The loss is composed of the loss on the sale of the business, which closed on September 25, 2019, and the loss on the sale of the facility, which is expected close in the fourth quarter of 2019.

The loss is comprised of a $12.0 million non-cash loss on the sale of the business and the facility and a $3.2 million loss related to contract cancellation costs, severance, and other expenses. The expected closing of the building in the fourth quarter of 2019 will not result in a gain or loss in that period.

The aggregate sales price for the transaction is $7.0 million, of which we received $3.6 million in the third quarter of 2019 at the closing of the sale of the business, will receive $3.0 million at the closing of the sale of the building in the fourth quarter of 2019, and expect to receive the balance of $0.4 million in 2020. The assets, liabilities, and results of operations for the brake products business unit are not significant to our consolidated financial position or result of operations.

Outlook

Our Power Systems segment reported strong results, with both sales and earnings up significantly compared to the first nine months of the prior year due to strong demand for military marine engines and aftermarket parts and services. The growth in Power Systems was more than offset by substantial year-over-year decline in profitability in Sealing Products resulting from challenges in our heavy-duty trucking business, driven primarily by lower volumes related to market decline and by warranty charges. Our performance was also affected by weakness within Engineered Products, market headwinds in the semiconductor capital equipment market, a negative translation impact due to a stronger dollar, and decreased sales in Sealing Products as a result of exiting the gas turbine business in 2018.

While we continued to see growth in engine aftermarket parts, military marine engine sales, aerospace, and mid-stream oil and gas in the third quarter, this growth was more than offset by a combination of weakness in heavy-duty trucking,

semiconductor capital equipment market, general industrial, automotive, a negative translation impact due to a stronger dollar, and decreased sales in Sealing Products as a result of exiting the gas turbine business in 2018.

In connection with our growth strategy, we will continue to evaluate making additional acquisitions that meet our acquisition criteria. We will also consider making additional strategic divestitures. The effect of such acquisitions and divestitures cannot be predicted and therefore is not reflected in this outlook.

Results of Operations



	Quarters Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2019			2018			2019			2018
	(in millions)
Sales
Sealing Products	$	226.9		$	249.6		$	690.7		$	737.2
Engineered Products	72.9			78.1			231.4			249.4
Power Systems	74.0			61.4			201.1			167.2
	373.8			389.1			1,123.2			1,153.8
Intersegment sales	(0.8		)	(0.9		)	(2.9		)	(3.2		)
Net sales	$	373.0		$	388.2		$	1,120.3		$	1,150.6
Segment Profit
Sealing Products	$	19.4		$	35.9		$	69.6		$	78.9
Engineered Products	9.0			8.4			25.3			34.9
Power Systems	8.9			8.7			24.6			12.5
Total segment profit	37.3			53.0			119.5			126.3
Corporate expenses	(7.5		)	(7.6		)	(23.7		)	(24.8		)
Interest expense, net	(3.8		)	(5.9		)	(12.5		)	(20.8		)
Other expense, net	(25.8		)	(15.0		)	(30.3		)	(17.6		)
Income before income taxes	$	0.2		$	24.5		$	53.0		$	63.1

Segment profit is total segment sales reduced by operating expenses, restructuring and other expenses identifiable with the segment. Corporate expenses include general corporate administrative costs. Expenses not directly attributable to the segments, corporate expenses, net interest expense, gains and losses related to the sale of assets, impairments, and income taxes are not included in the computation of segment profit. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those for EnPro.

Other expense, net in the table above contains all items included in other (operating) expense and other expense (non-operating) on our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 with the exception of $2.2 million, $0.7 million, $4.4 million, and $5.1 million, respectively, of restructuring costs. As noted previously, restructuring costs are considered to be a part of segment profit. Additionally, other expense, net in the table above for the quarters and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 also includes $1.1 million, $0.9 million, $2.7 million and $2.0 million, respectively, of miscellaneous expenses that are either not associated with a particular segment or not considered part of administering the corporate headquarters. These expenses are included in selling, general and administrative expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Third Quarter of 2019 Compared to the Third Quarterof 2018

Sales of $373.0 million in the third quarter of 2019 decreased 3.9% from $388.2 million in the third quarter of 2018. The following table summarizes the impact of acquisitions, divestitures, and foreign currency on sales by segment:



Sales	Percent Change Third Quarter 2019 vs. Third Quarter 2018
increase/(decrease)	Acquisitions and Divestitures		Foreign Currency		Organic		Total
EnPro Industries, Inc.	(0.6	)%	(0.9	)%	(2.4	)%	(3.9	)%
Sealing Products	(0.9	)%	(0.6	)%	(7.6	)%	(9.1	)%
Engineered Products	—	%	(2.5	)%	(4.2	)%	(6.7	)%
Power Systems	—	%	—	%	20.5	%	20.5	%

Following is a discussion of operating results for each segment during the third quarter of 2019:

Sealing Products. Sales of $226.9 million in the third quarter of 2019 reflect a 9.1% decrease compared to the $249.6 million reported in the same period of 2018. Excluding the unfavorable foreign exchange translation ($1.7 million) and the net impact of acquisitions and divestitures ($2.0 million), sales were down 7.6% or $19.0 million. This decline was due primarily to softness in the semiconductor capital equipment and heavy-duty trucking markets, partially offset by strength in the midstream oil and gas markets.

Segment profit of $19.4 million in the third quarter of 2019 was a decrease of 46.0% from $35.9 million reported in the same period of 2018. Operating margins for the segment decreased from 14.4% in the third quarter of 2018 to 8.6% in the third quarter of 2019. Excluding a year-over-year increase in restructuring costs ($0.8 million), a year-over-year increase in acquisition-related costs ($4.3 million), unfavorable foreign exchange translation ($0.3 million), and removing the effect of acquisitions and divestitures ($0.7 million), segment profit decreased $10.4 million, or 28.6% compared to the prior year. The decrease in segment profit was driven by the aforementioned decrease in sales ($7.7 million), 2018 legal settlements favorably impacting prior year ($4.2 million), increased warranty charges driven primarily by products in our heavy-duty trucking business ($3.1 million), and an unfavorable product mix ($2.0 million). These decreases were partially offset by increased pricing ($2.6 million), more favorable material savings driven by steel, rubber, and aluminum ($2.5 million), reduced incentive compensation costs ($1.5 million), and reduced medical expenses ($1.3 million).

Engineered Products. Sales in the third quarter of 2019 decreased 6.7% to $72.9 million from $78.1 million reported in the same period of 2018. Excluding the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange translation ($1.9 million), sales were down 4.2% or $3.2 million primarily due to weakness in automotive and general industrial markets, partially offset by strength in the aerospace market.

Segment profit in the third quarter of 2019 was $9.0 million compared to $8.4 million in the same period of 2018, an increase of $0.6 million, or 7.1%. Operating margins for the segment were 12.3%, which was up from 10.8% in the third quarter of 2018. Excluding the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange translation ($0.3 million), acquisition expenses ($0.1 million), and increased restructuring costs of ($0.2 million), segment profit increased $1.2 million, or 13.3%, driven mainly by a favorable product mix ($0.8 million), reduced marketing and selling costs driven by restructuring initiatives ($0.8 million), increased labor efficiencies, including reduced scrap and rework ($1.1 million), and reduced incentive compensation costs ($0.5 million), partially offset by lower sales volume ($2.0 million).

Power Systems. Sales of $74.0 million in the third quarter of 2019 increased $12.6 million, or 20.5%, from $61.4 million in the same period of 2018. The increase was driven by strong military marine engine and aftermarket parts sales, partially offset by lower sales to the power generation market.

The segment reported a profit of $8.9 million in the third quarter of 2019 compared to $8.7 million in the third quarter of 2018. Operating margins for the segment were 12.0% in the third quarter of 2019 compared to 14.2% in the third quarter of 2018. Excluding the year-over-year favorable impact of foreign exchange on the EDF contract ($1.2 million), and the year-over-year increase in restructuring and impairment charges ($0.8 million), segment profit increased $2.2 million, or 24.0%. This was mainly driven by a change in product mix, with higher aftermarket parts and services revenue having a positive impact on margins ($4.7 million), partially offset by inventory write downs ($1.4 million) and higher personnel and professional costs ($1.1 million).

Corporate expenses for the third quarter of 2019 decreased $0.1 million as compared to the same period in 2018. The decrease was driven primarily by decreased incentive compensation costs ($0.7 million), partially offset by increased legal and audit fees ($0.4 million).

Interest expense, net in the third quarter of 2019 decreased by $2.1 million as compared to the same period of 2018, primarily due to a decrease in average outstanding debt, a lower average interest rate on outstanding debt in the current quarter in comparison to prior year, and higher interest credits in the current year associated with our cross-currency swap agreements.

Other expense, net in the third quarter of 2019 increased by $10.8 million as compared to the same period of 2018, due mainly to a $15.3 million loss on sale of business in 2019, $7.8 million increase in environmental reserve adjustments and other costs associated with disposed businesses, and a $0.5 million increase in pension (non-service) costs, offset by a $12.8 million prior-year unfavorable pension settlement cost.

The effective tax rates for the third quarter of September 30, 2019 and 2018 were 878.7% and 1.2%, respectively. The higher effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2019 is primarily the result of a geographical mix of lower pre-tax income in the U.S. combined with new minimum tax on certain non-U.S. earnings and disproportionately higher pre-tax income in higher foreign tax jurisdictions. Pre-tax income in the U.S. was adversely impacted a loss on divestiture, acquisition costs, and environmental charges. The effective tax rate for the quarter ending September 30, 2018 included the minimum tax on certain non-U.S. earnings, the favorable impact of discrete items occurring in the quarter resulting from a refinement of the provisional estimate of our transition tax, and the tax benefit associated with the pension annuitization completed in the third quarter of 2018.

Net loss was $1.5 million, or $(0.08) per share, in the third quarter of 2019 compared to net income of $24.2 million, or $1.16 per share, in the same period of 2018. Earnings per share is expressed on a diluted basis.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Compared to the Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2018

Sales of $1,120.3 million in the first nine months of 2019 decreased 2.6% from $1,150.6 million in the first nine months of 2018. The following table summarizes the impact of acquisitions, divestitures, and foreign currency on sales by segment:



Sales	Percent Change Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 vs. Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
increase/(decrease)	Acquisitions and Divestitures		Foreign Currency		Organic		Total
EnPro Industries, Inc.	(0.9	)%	(1.4	)%	(0.3	)%	(2.6	)%
Sealing Products	(1.3	)%	(1.0	)%	(4.0	)%	(6.3	)%
Engineered Products	—	%	(3.8	)%	(3.4	)%	(7.2	)%
Power Systems	—	%	(0.1	)%	20.4	%	20.3	%

Following is a discussion of operating results for each segment during the first nine months of 2019:

Sealing Products. Sales of $690.7 million in the first nine months of 2019 reflect a 6.3% decrease compared to the $737.2 million reported in the same period of 2018. Excluding the unfavorable foreign exchange translation ($7.5 million) and the net impact of acquisitions and divestitures ($9.8 million), sales were down 4.0% or $29.2 million. This decline was due primarily to softness in the semiconductor capital equipment and heavy-duty trucking markets, partially offset by strengthening in aerospace and midstream oil and gas markets.

Segment profit of $69.6 million in the first nine months of 2019 decreased 11.8% from $78.9 million reported in the same period of 2018. Operating margins for the segment decreased from 10.7% in the first nine months of 2018 to 10.1% in the first nine months of 2019. Excluding a year-over-year increase in restructuring costs ($0.1 million), a year-over-year increase in acquisition-related costs ($5.7 million), unfavorable foreign exchange translation ($1.2 million), and a net favorable year-over-year impact of acquisitions and divestitures ($6.8 million), segment profit decreased $9.1 million, or 10.2% compared to the prior year. The decrease in segment profit was driven by a decrease in sales volume ($15.0 million), unfavorable product mix ($5.3 million), 2018 legal settlements favorably impacting prior year ($4.2 million), partially offset by increased pricing ($6.1 million), manufacturing efficiencies ($4.0 million), reduced marketing and selling costs driven by restructuring activities ($1.9 million), reduced material costs ($1.6 million) and reduced incentive compensation ($1.4 million).

Engineered Products. Sales in the first nine months of 2019 decreased 7.2% to $231.4 million from $249.4 million reported in the same period of 2018. Excluding the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange translation ($9.6 million), sales were down 3.4% or $8.4 million primarily due to weakness in automotive and general industrial markets.

Segment profit in the first nine months of 2019 was $25.3 million compared to $34.9 million in the same period of 2018, a decrease of $9.6 million, or 27.5%. Operating margins for the segment were 10.9%, which was down from 14.0% in the first nine months of 2018. Excluding the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange translation ($1.6 million), increased acquisition expenses ($0.6 million), and increased restructuring charges ($0.2 million) segment profit decreased $7.2 million, or 20.3%, driven mainly by decreased sales volume ($5.2 million), increased manufacturing costs ($2.1 million) and increased research and development costs ($1.0 million), partially offset by a more favorable product mix ($1.1 million).

Power Systems. Sales of $201.1 million in the first nine months of 2019 increased $33.9 million, or 20.3%, from $167.2 million in the same period of 2018. Excluding the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange translation ($0.1 million), sales increased by $34.0 million, or 20.4%. The increase was driven by strong military marine engine and aftermarket parts and services sales, partially offset by lower sales to the power generation market.

The segment reported a profit of $24.6 million in the first nine months of 2019 compared to $12.5 million in the first nine months of 2018, an increase of 96.8%. Operating margins for the segment were 12.2% in the first nine months of 2019 compared to 7.5% in the first nine months of 2018. Excluding the impact of foreign exchange on the EDF contract in both 2019 and 2018, which results in a year-over-year unfavorable impact ($0.1 million) and an increase in restructuring and impairment charges ($0.5 million), segment profit increased $12.8 million, or 86.0%. This was mainly driven by a change in product mix, with higher aftermarket parts and services revenue having a positive impact on margins ($16.7 million), partially offset by a decrease margin on engine contract ($3.0 million) and inventory write downs ($1.3 million).

Corporate expenses for the first nine months of 2019 decreased $1.1 million as compared to the same period in 2018. The decrease was driven primarily by overall decreased medical costs ($1.3 million), and decreased research and development costs ($1.0 million) due to the discontinuance of corporate funded R&D beginning in 2019, partially offset by the favorable 2018 impact of recognizing share based award at fair value due to the decline in our share price during the period ($0.9 million), and increased consulting fees ($0.5 million).

Interest expense, net in the first nine months of 2019 decreased by $8.3 million as compared to the same period of 2018, primarily due to a decrease in average outstanding debt and higher interest credits in the current year associated with our cross-currency swap agreements.

Other expense, net in the first nine months of 2019 increased by $12.7 million as compared to the same period of 2018, due mainly to a $15.3 million loss on sale of business in 2019, $7.2 million increase in environmental reserve costs and other costs from previously disposed of businesses, and a $3.2 million increase in pension (non-service) costs. These increases were partially offset by a $12.8 million prior year unfavorable pension settlement cost.

Net income was $35.5 million, or $1.71 per share, in the first nine months of 2019 compared to net income of $46.7 million, or $2.20 per share, in the same period of 2018. Earnings per share is expressed on a diluted basis.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash requirements for, but not limited to, working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and debt repayments have been funded from cash balances on hand, revolver borrowings and cash generated from operations. We are proactively pursuing acquisition opportunities. It is possible our cash requirements for one or more acquisition opportunities could exceed our cash balance at the time of closing. Should we need additional capital, we have resources available, which are discussed in this section under the heading “Capital Resources.”

As of September 30, 2019, we held all of our $112.1 million of cash and cash equivalents outside of the United States. If the funds held outside the United States were needed for our operations in the U.S., we have several methods to repatriate without significant tax effects, including repayment of intercompany loans or distributions of previously taxed income. In addition, as of September 30, 2019, we had a net current income tax receivable totaling $21.3 million.

Because of the transition tax and GILTI provisions, undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries totaling $254.6 million at September 30, 2019 have been subjected to U.S. income tax. Whether through the application of the 100 percent dividends-received deduction provided in the Tax Act, or the distribution of these previously-taxed earnings, we do not intend to distribute foreign earnings that will be subject to any significant incremental U.S. or foreign tax.

Cash Flows

Operating activities provided $150.7 million and $158.4 million of cash in the first nine months of 2019 and 2018, respectively. The decrease was due primarily to lower net income tax refunds, lower asbestos insurance receipts in 2019, and lower net income, partially offset by improved working capital in our Power Systems segment and lower pension contributions.

Investing activities used $332.7 million and $11.8 million of cash during the first nine months of 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase in cash usage was driven by $310.4 million used for acquiring businesses, $25.8 million received in 2018 for the sale of fixed assets, primarily from sale of land and building at Oxford, Massachusetts as we exited our industrial gas turbine business of our Technetics division in the Sealing Products segment, partially offset by lower capital expenditures in 2019 ($21.9 million).

Financing activities provided $166.1 million in cash in the first nine months of 2019, primarily from $150 million in proceeds from a new term loan facility, and a $51.8 million net draw on the revolver, partially offset by $15.0 million in cash used to repurchase shares and $15.7 million in dividends paid. Financing activities in the first nine months of 2018 used cash of $211.5 million, primarily from $50 million in cash used to repurchase shares, $15.3 million in dividends paid, and $139.4 million in net repayments on our revolving credit facility. Funding for the 2018 activity was mainly derived from tax refunds and repatriation of previously taxed earnings from our foreign subsidiaries.

Capital Resources

Senior Secured Credit Facilities. On September 25, 2019, we entered into a First Amendment (the "First Amendment") to our Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement”) among EnPro Industries, Inc. and EnPro Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“EnPro Holdings”), as borrowers, the guarantors party thereto, the lenders party thereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and Letter of Credit Issuer. The Credit Agreement provides for a five-year, senior secured revolving credit facility of $400.0 million (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) and a five-year, senior secured term loan facility of $150.0 million (the "Term Loan Facility" and, together with the Revolving Credit Facility, the "Facilities"). The Amended Credit Agreement also provides that the borrowers may seek incremental term loans and/or additional revolving credit commitments in an amount equal to the greater of $225.0 million and 100% of consolidated EBITDA (as defined) for the most recently ended four-quarter period for which we have reported financial results, plus additional amounts based on a consolidated senior secured leverage ratio.

The Term Loan Facility will amortize on a quarterly basis in an annual amount equal to 2.50% of the original principal amount of the Term Loan Facility in each of years one through three, 5.00% of such original principal amount in year four, and 1.25% of such original principal amount in each of the first three quarters of year five, with the remaining outstanding principal amount payable at maturity.

The Facilities are subject to prepayment with the net cash proceeds of certain asset sales, casualty or condemnation events, and non-permitted debt issuances.

The Company and EnPro Holdings are the permitted borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility. We have the ability to add foreign subsidiaries as borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility for up to $100.0 million (or its foreign currency equivalent) in aggregate borrowings, subject to certain conditions. Each of our domestic, consolidated subsidiaries are required to guarantee the obligations of the borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility, and each of our existing domestic, consolidated subsidiaries has entered into the Credit Agreement to provide such a guarantee.

Borrowings under the Facilities are secured by a first-priority pledge of the following assets:

100% of the capital stock of each domestic, consolidated subsidiary of the Company (other than unrestricted subsidiaries);

65% of the capital stock of any first tier foreign subsidiary of the Company and its domestic, consolidated subsidiaries (other than unrestricted subsidiaries); and

substantially all of the assets (including, without limitation, machinery and equipment, inventory and other goods, accounts receivable, certain owned real estate and related fixtures, bank accounts, general intangibles, financial assets, investment property, license rights, patents, trademarks, trade names, copyrights, chattel paper, insurance

proceeds, contract rights, hedge agreements, documents, instruments, indemnification rights, tax refunds and cash) of the Company and its domestic, consolidated subsidiaries (other than unrestricted subsidiaries)

The Credit Agreement contains certain financial covenants and required financial ratios, including:

a maximum consolidated total net leverage ratio of not more than 4.25 to 1.0 (with total debt, for the purposes of such ratio, to be net of up to $125 million of unrestricted cash of EnPro Industries, Inc. and its domestic, consolidated subsidiaries), which ratio will decrease to 4.0 to 1.0 for each fiscal quarter beginning with the fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2020 and, once so decrease, may be increased (up to three times) at the borrowers' option to not more than 4.5 to 1.0 for the for-quarter period following a significant acquisition; and

a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of at least 2.5 to 1.0.

The Credit Agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants (subject, in each case, to customary exceptions and qualifications), including covenants that limit our ability to, among other things:

grant liens on our assets;

incur additional indebtedness (including guarantees and other contingent obligations);

make certain investments (including loans and advances);

merge or make other fundamental changes;

sell or otherwise dispose of property or assets;

pay dividends and other distributions and prepay certain indebtedness;

make changes in the nature of our business;

enter into transactions with our affiliates;

enter into burdensome contracts; and

modify or terminate documents related to certain indebtedness.

We were in compliance with all covenants of the Revolving Credit Facility as of September 30, 2019.

The borrowing availability at September 30, 2019 under the Amended Credit Agreement was $212.8 million, representing the $550.0 million amount of the Facilities less $17.5 million reserved for outstanding letters of credit and $319.7 million of outstanding borrowings.

Senior Notes. In October 2018, we completed the offering of $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.75% Senior Notes due 2026 (the "Senior Notes").

The Senior Notes were issued to investors at 100% of the principal amount thereof. The Senior Notes are unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of EnPro and mature on October 15, 2026. Interest on the Senior Notes accrues at a rate of 5.75% per annum and is payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year, commencing April 15, 2019. The Senior Notes are required to be guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of EnPro’s existing and future direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries that is a borrower under, or guarantees, our indebtedness under the Revolving Credit Facility or guarantees any other Capital Markets Indebtedness (as defined in the indenture governing the Senior Notes) of EnPro or any of the guarantors.

On or after October 15, 2021, we may, on any one or more occasions, redeem all or a part of the Senior Notes at specified redemption prices plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, we may redeem a portion of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes before October 15, 2021 with the net cash proceeds from certain equity offerings at a specified redemption price plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the redemption date. We may also redeem some or all of the Senior Notes before October 15, 2021 at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but not including, the redemption date, plus a “make whole” premium.

Each holder of the Senior Notes may require us to repurchase some or all of the Senior Notes held by such holder for cash upon the occurrence of a defined “change of control” event. Our ability to redeem the Senior Notes prior to maturity is subject to certain conditions, including in certain cases the payment of make-whole amounts.

The indenture governing the Senior Notes includes covenants that restrict our ability to engage in certain activities, including incurring additional indebtedness, paying dividends and repurchasing shares of our common stock, subject in each case to specified exceptions and qualifications set forth in the indenture.

Share Repurchase Program. In October 2018, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of our outstanding common shares. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we repurchased 0.2 million shares for

$15.0 million. The remaining amount of authorized purchases in the program at September 30, 2019 was $35.0 million. The program will expire in October 2020.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Please refer to our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, for a discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates.

Contingencies

General

A detailed description of environmental and other legal matters relating to certain of our subsidiaries is included in this section. In addition to the matters noted herein, we are from time to time subject to, and are presently involved in, other litigation and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe the outcome of such other litigation and legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Expenses for administrative and legal proceedings are recorded when incurred.

Environmental

Although we believe past operations were in substantial compliance with the then applicable regulations, we or one or more of our subsidiaries are involved with various remediation activities at 21 sites. At 16 of these sites, the future cost per site for us or our subsidiary is expected to exceed $100,000. Of these 21 sites, 18 are sites where we or one or more of our subsidiaries formerly conducted business operations but no longer do, and 3 are sites where we conduct manufacturing operations. Investigations have been completed for 16 sites and are in progress at the other 5 sites. Our costs at 14 of the 21 sites relate to remediation projects for soil and/or groundwater contamination at or near former operating facilities that were sold or closed.

As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had accrued liabilities aggregating $34.6 million and $31.1 million, respectively, for estimated future expenditures relating to environmental contingencies. Given the uncertainties regarding the status of laws, regulations, enforcement policies, the impact of other parties potentially being fully or partially liable, technology and information related to individual sites, we do not believe it is possible to develop an estimate of the range of reasonably possible environmental loss in excess of our recorded liabilities. In addition, based on our prior ownership of Crucible, we may have additional contingent liabilities in one or more significant environmental matters, which are included in the 21 sites referred to above. Except with respect to specific Crucible environmental matters for which we have accrued a portion of the liability set forth above, we are unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss related to these contingent liabilities. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our environmental contingencies and see the section titled “Crucible Steel Corporation a/k/a Crucible, Inc.” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Except as described below, we believe that our accruals for specific environmental liabilities are adequate for those liabilities based on currently available information. Actual costs to be incurred in future periods may vary from estimates because of the inherent uncertainties in evaluating environmental exposures due to unknown and changing conditions, changing government regulations and legal standards regarding liability.

EnPro Holdings and approximately 70 of the numerous other PRPs, known as the Cooperating Parties Group, are parties to a May 2007 Administrative Order on Consent with the EPA to perform a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (“RI/FS”) of the contaminants in the Lower Passaic River Study Area. In September 2018, EnPro Holdings withdrew from the Cooperating Parties Group but remains a party to the May 2007 Administrative Order on Consent. The RI/FS was completed and submitted to the EPA at the end of April 2015. The RI/FS recommends a targeted dredge and cap remedy with monitored natural recovery and adaptive management for the Lower Passaic River Study Area. The cost of such remedy is estimated to be $726 million. Previously, on April 11, 2014, the EPA released its Focused Feasibility Study (the “FFS”) with its proposed plan for remediating the lower eight miles of the Lower Passaic River Study Area. The FFS calls for bank-to-bank dredging and capping of the riverbed of that portion of the river and estimates a range of the present value of aggregate remediation costs of approximately $953 million to approximately $1.73 billion, although estimates of the costs and the timing of costs are inherently imprecise. On March 3, 2016, the EPA issued the final Record of Decision (ROD) as to the remedy for the lower eight miles of the Lower Passaic River Study Area, with the maximum estimated cost being reduced by the EPA from $1.73 billion to $1.38 billion, primarily due to a reduction in the amount of cubic yards of material that will be dredged. In October 2016, Occidental Chemical Corporation, the successor to the entity that operated the Diamond Alkali chemical manufacturing facility, reached an agreement with the EPA to develop the design for this proposed remedy at an estimated cost of $165 million. The EPA has estimated that it will take approximately four years to develop this design.

Based on our evaluation of the site, during 2014 we accrued a liability of $3.5 million related to environmental remediation costs associated with the lower eight miles of the Lower Passaic River Study Area, which is our estimate of the low end of a range of reasonably possible costs, with no estimate within the range being a better estimate than the minimum. Since 2016, we incurred $0.7 million in costs related to this matter. Our ~~actual~~future remediation costs could be significantly greater than the ~~$3.5~~$2.8 million ~~we accrued.~~remaining accrual at September 30, 2019. With respect to the upper nine miles of the Lower Passaic River Study Area, we are unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible costs.

Another such matter involves the Onondaga Lake Superfund Site (the “Onondaga Site”) located near Syracuse, New ~~York.~~York, which is also included in the 21 sites referred to above. Crucible operated a steel mill facility adjacent to Onondaga Lake from 1911 to 1983. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“NYSDEC”) has contacted us and ~~Coltec,~~EnPro Holdings, as well as other parties, demanding reimbursement of unquantified environmental response costs incurred by NYSDEC and the EPA at the Onondaga Site. NYSDEC and EPA have alleged that contamination from the Crucible facility contributed to the need for environmental response actions at the Onondaga Site. We have also received notice from the Natural Resource Trustees for the Onondaga Lake Superfund Site (which are the U.S. Department of Interior, NYSDEC, and the Onondaga Nation) alleging that EnPro Holdings is considered to be a potentially responsible party for natural resource damages at the Onondaga Site. In addition, Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”), which has undertaken certain remediation activities at the Onondaga Site under the supervision of NYSDEC and the EPA, has informed ~~the Company~~us that it has claims against ~~Coltec~~EnPro Holdings related to investigation and remediation at the Onondaga Site. We have entered into tolling agreements with NYSDEC, the EPA and Honeywell. On May 4, 2016, we received from Honeywell a summary of its ~~claims. We have corresponded with Honeywell and have begun discussions with them regarding their claims. In addition, we have received notice from the Natural Resource Trustees~~claims, including for a portion of its costs for the remediation of the Onondaga ~~Lake Superfund~~ Site ~~(which are the U.S. Department of Interior,~~in accordance with its settlement with NYSDEC and ~~the Onondaga Nation) alleging that Coltec is considered to be a potentially responsible party for natural resource damages at the Onondaga Site. At this time, based~~EPA. Based on limited information ~~we have~~available with respect to estimated remediation costs and the respective allocation of responsibility for remediation among potentially responsible parties, we ~~cannot~~previously were unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss associated with Crucible’s activities that may have affected the Onondaga Site. We

Except with respect to specific Crucible environmental matters for which we have ~~reserved $1.5 million for reimbursement~~accrued a portion of ~~EPA response costs~~the liability set forth above, including the Lower Passaic River Study Area and ~~certain costs associated with~~ the ~~remedial investigation.~~Onondaga site, we are unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss related to any other contingent environmental liability based on our prior ownership of Crucible.

~~See the section entitled “Crucible Steel Corporation a/k/a Crucible, Inc.” in this footnote for additional information.~~

In addition to the Crucible environmental matters discussed above, ~~Coltec has~~EnPro Holdings received a notice from the EPA dated February 19, 2014 asserting that ~~Coltec~~EnPro Holdings is a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA") as the successor to a former operator in 1954 and 1955 of two uranium mines in Arizona. On October 15, 2015, ~~Coltec~~EnPro Holdings received another notice from the EPA asserting that ~~Coltec~~it is a potentially responsible party as the successor to the

former operator of six additional uranium mines in Arizona. In 2015, we reserved $1.1 million for the minimum amount of probable loss associated with the first two mines identified by the EPA, including the cost of the investigative work to be conducted at such ~~sites.~~mines. During ~~the second quarter of~~ 2016, we reserved an additional $1.1 million for the minimum amount of probable loss associated with the six additional mines, which includes ~~additional~~ estimated costs of investigative work to be conducted at the eight mines. ~~At September 30,~~We entered into an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent for Interim Removal Action with the EPA effective November 7, 2017 for the performance of this work. In the third quarter of 2017, we increased the reserve by $1.9 million to ~~a balance of $4.0 million in anticipation of entering into an agreement with~~perform investigations required by the ~~EPA to perform investigations~~Settlement Agreement to determine the nature and extent of contamination at each site with the investigations anticipated to be completed by the end of ~~2019.~~2020. In the fourth quarter of 2018, we increased the reserve by $1.0 million for the estimated reimbursement of the EPA's costs to oversee these investigations. The balance in the reserve as of September 30, 2019 is $2.2 million. We cannot at this time estimate a reasonably possible range of loss associated with remediation or other incremental costs related to these mines.

In connection with the former operation of a division of ~~Colt Industries Inc,~~EnPro Holdings located in Water Valley, Mississippi, which ~~Coltec~~was divested to BorgWarner, Inc. ("BorgWarner") in 1996, ~~Coltec~~EnPro Holdings has been managing trichloroethylene soil and groundwater contamination at the site. In February 2016, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) issued an order against EnPro Holdings requiring evaluation of potential vapor intrusion into residential properties and commercial facilities located over the groundwater plume as well as requiring additional groundwater investigation and remediation. MDEQ performed the initial vapor intrusion investigations at certain residential and commercial sites, with the findings all being below the applicable screening level. In April 2016, the parties entered into a new order including negotiated time frames for groundwater remediation. Pursuant to that order, MDEQ performed a second round of ~~seasonable~~ vapor intrusion sampling beginning in August 2016. Results from sampling outside of three residences were above screening levels. Follow-up sampling directly underneath those residences (either sub-slab or in crawl spaces) were all below applicable screening levels. Two separate sampling events at another residence were also below applicable screening levels. Due to an increasing trend in vapor concentrations, MDEQ requested that we develop and implement initial corrective action measures to address vapor intrusion resulting from groundwater contamination in this residential area. These measures ~~have been~~were developed and approved by MDEQ. ~~Implementation of the approved measures will begin when~~Due to an inability to obtain access ~~is obtained~~ to private properties where the corrective action system ~~will~~was to be ~~located.~~located, we developed an alternate remedial approach which has been approved by MDEQ. In addition, vapor intrusion sampling at the manufacturing facility owned by BorgWarner was conducted during the first quarter of 2017. The results showed exceedances of screening levels at various areas in the plant and exceedances of levels requiring responsive actions in a limited area of the plant.

Implementation of the immediate responsive actions has been completed and corrective action consisting of a permanent vapor intrusion remediation system became operational in May ~~2017.~~2017 with further improvements made to the system in December 2017 and January 2018. Indoor air sampling is conducted at four locations biweekly and have been below levels requiring responsive action at three sampling locations since June 2017 and at all four locations since February 2018. We are also continuing soil and groundwater investigation work in the area inside the plant where the vapor intrusion remediation system is located and around the outside of the plant and ~~developing~~implementing corrective action plans for both the contamination remaining at the plant as well as contamination that has migrated off-site. All of the work to be performed at the residential area, the plant and off-site is set forth in an agreed Order that we and MDEQ entered into on September 11, 2017.

During ~~the quarter ended March 31,~~ 2016, we established an additional $1.3 million reserve with respect to this matter. During the ~~quarter~~year ended ~~March~~December 31, 2017, we reserved an additional ~~$3.3~~$5.7 million for further investigation, additional remediation, long-term monitoring costs, and legal fees to support regulatory compliance for the above noted actions. ~~The remaining reserve at September 30, 2017 is $1.8 million.~~In the fourth quarter of 2018, we reserved an additional $3.5 million for additional remediation, long-term monitoring costs and legal fees to support regulatory compliance for the above noted activities. As the corrective actions are implemented and their performance monitored, further modifications to the remediation system at the site may be required which may result in additional costs beyond the current reserve.

On April 7, 2017, the State of Mississippi through its Attorney General filed suit against EnPro ~~OldCo~~Holdings and Goodrich Corporation (EnPro's former corporate parent), in Mississippi Circuit Court in Yalobusha County seeking recovery of all costs and expenses to be incurred by the State in remediating the groundwater contamination, punitive damages and attorney’s fees. We ~~plan to~~are aggressively ~~defend~~defending this case. The additional reserve established in the ~~quarter~~year ended ~~March~~December 31, 2017, noted above, does not include any estimate of contingent loss associated with this lawsuit other than due to remediation and other actions with respect to this site based on existing MDEQ orders described above. On January 31, 2019, some of these property owners (representing ownership of 27 residential, agricultural or commercial properties), Yalobusha County, and the ~~expected order with MDEQ described above.~~Board of Trustees of the Yalobusha General Hospital filed suit against EnPro and Goodrich in Mississippi Circuit Court and Yalobusha County seeking recovery for alleged damage to their properties, including diminution in value, from groundwater

contamination that has come onto their properties. These cases have been removed to the federal U.S. District Court and plaintiffs' challenge to such removal has been denied by the federal court. In addition, it is our understanding that other area homeowners, owners of commercial facilities and ~~the local county government and~~ possibly other private parties and individuals ~~have engaged or~~ may ~~engage legal counsel to~~be separately ~~evaluate~~evaluating possible legal action relating to potential vapor intrusion and groundwater contamination. We

Mediation of the lawsuit brought by Yalobusha County and the Board of Trustees of the Yalobusha County General Hospital is scheduled to be held in December 2019.

In light of this settlement and the upcoming mediation, for the third quarter of 2019, we further ~~advised that certain~~increased our reserve for this matter, including the remediation matters described above, by $4.4 million to reflect an aggregate reserve of ~~these parties intend to file~~$7.5 million. Beyond this increase, we cannot estimate a reasonably possible range of loss from the remaining lawsuits or any potential additional legal ~~action based on these claims.~~actions at this time. Based upon limited information regarding any ~~further~~incremental remediation or other actions that may be required at the site, we cannot estimate a minimum loss ~~estimate~~ or a reasonably possible range of loss ~~for remediation costs.~~

~~Colt Firearms and Central Moloney~~

~~We may have contingent liabilities~~ related to divested businesses for which certain of our subsidiaries retained liability or are obligated under indemnity agreements. These contingent liabilities include, but are not limited to, potential product liability and associated claims related to firearms manufactured prior to March 1990 by Colt Firearms, a former operation of Coltec, and for electrical transformers manufactured prior to May 1994 by Central Moloney, another former Coltec operation. We believe that these potential contingent liabilities are not material to our financial condition, results of operation and cash flows. Ongoing obligations with regard to workers’ compensation, retiree medical and other retiree benefit matters that relate to Coltec’s periods of ownership of these operations are included in other liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

this matter.

Crucible Steel Corporation a/k/a Crucible, Inc.

We have certain ongoing obligations, which are included in other liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, including workers’ compensation, retiree medical and other retiree benefit matters, ~~in addition to those mentioned previously~~ related to Coltec’s period of ownership of Crucible. Based on Coltec’s prior ownership of Crucible, we may have certain ~~additional~~other contingent liabilities, including liabilities in one or more significant environmental matters included in the matters discussed in “Environmental” above. We are investigating these matters. Except with respect to those matters for which we have an accrued liability as discussed in ~~"Environmental"~~“Environmental” above, we are unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss related to these contingent liabilities. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information about certain liabilities relating to Coltec’s ownership of Crucible.

Warranties

Changes in the carrying amount of the product warranty liability for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2019 and ~~2016~~2018 are as follows:


	2017			2016			2019			2018
	(in millions)						(in millions)
Balance at beginning of year	$	5.0		$	4.8		$	11.7		$	5.3
Net charges to expense	1.4			3.3			6.7			5.8
Settlements made	(1.7		)	(3.4		)	(4.7		)	(2.3		)
Balance at end of period	$	4.7		$	4.7		$	13.7		$	8.8

BorgWarner

such bearings that were a cause of the damages claimed by BorgWarner, including whether GGB France was required to notify BorgWarner of a change in the source of a raw material used in the manufacture of such bearings. This technical review was a required predicate to the commencement of a legal proceeding for damages. In June 2016, the expert panel issued a preliminary report on technical matters considered by the experts. This preliminary report concluded that the change in the source of the raw material was the technical cause of the performance problems claimed by BorgWarner and that GGB France was obligated to notify BorgWarner regarding the change. Separately, in November 2016, the expert panel issued a preliminary report on related financial matters. The expert panel issued a final report on technical and financial matters on April 6, 2017. In the final report, the expert panel concluded that GGB France had a duty to notify BorgWarner regarding the change of source of raw material used in the bearings, but that the failure of the hydraulic control units was attributable to both the raw material supplier change and the insufficient design of the units by BorgWarner. The expert panel provided detail on a possible allocation of damages alleged to have been incurred by BorgWarner and its customer. Although the language of the report is not clear, the report appears to note a potential allocation of recoverable damages ~~35% to BorgWarner and~~ 65% to GGB ~~France.~~and 35% to BorgWarner. It also indicates that, though it is for a court to ultimately determine, the aggregate damages to BorgWarner and its customer was in the range of 7.9 million EUR to 10.2 million EUR, with 1.8 million EUR to 2.1 million EUR of this range being for damages to BorgWarner and the remainder being for damages to its customer. The experts noted the lower end of the range as being more likely and noted a lack of sufficient evidence provided substantiating the customer's damages. Applying a 65% liability allocation to GGB to the total aggregate range yields a range of 5.1 million EUR to 6.6 million EUR. In the final report, the expert panel deferred to a court the determination of whether GGB France had breached its contractual obligations to BorgWarner. On October 25, 2017, BorgWarner initiated a legal proceeding against GGB with respect to this matter by filing a writ of claim with the Commercial Court of Brive, France.

The parties have begun briefing their legal positions, and we expect court hearings to begin in late 2019 and a court ruling in early 2020.

Asbestos Insurance Matters

~~Background on Asbestos-Related Litigation~~. The historical business operations of ~~GST LLC and Anchor~~certain of our subsidiaries resulted in a substantial volume of asbestos litigation in which plaintiffs alleged personal injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos ~~fibers in products produced or sold by GST~~fibers. In 2010, certain of these subsidiaries, including Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC or Anchor, together with products produced and sold by numerous other companies. GST LLC and Anchor manufactured and/or sold industrial sealing products that contained encapsulated asbestos fibers. Other of our subsidiaries that manufactured or sold equipment that may have at various times in the past contained asbestos-containing components have also been named in a number of asbestos lawsuits, but neither we nor any of our subsidiaries other than GST LLC and Anchor had ever paid an asbestos claim.

~~Since the first asbestos-related lawsuits were filed against GST LLC in 1975, GST LLC and Anchor have processed more than~~ ~~900,000~~ ~~claims to conclusion, and, together with insurers, have paid over~~ ~~$1.4 billion~~ ~~in settlements and judgments and over~~ ~~$400 million~~ ~~in fees and expenses. Our subsidiaries’ exposure to asbestos litigation and their relationships with insurance carriers have been managed through Garrison.~~

~~Subsidiary Chapter 11 Filings and Effect. On the GST Petition Date, GST LLC, Garrison and Anchor~~("GST"), filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy ~~Court. The filings were~~Court for the ~~initial step in a claims resolution process. See “— Joint Plan~~Western District of Reorganization,” below, for a description of the comprehensive consensual settlement that we announced on March 17, 2016 to resolve current and future asbestos claims and the Joint Plan filed in the GST Chapter 11 Case to implement such settlement. As contemplated by the Joint Plan, on the OldCo Petition Date, OldCo, as the successor by merger to Coltec,North Carolina (the "Bankruptcy Court"). An additional subsidiary filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition with the Bankruptcy ~~Court.~~

AsCourt in 2017. The filings were part of a ~~result of the initiation of the GST Chapter 11 Case~~claims resolution process for an efficient and ~~the OldCo Chapter 11 Case, the~~permanent resolution of ~~asbestos claims against these companies was subject to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court. The filing of the GST Chapter 11 Case automatically stayed the prosecution of~~all pending asbestos bodily injury and wrongful death lawsuits, and initiation of new such lawsuits, against GST. Further, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order enjoining plaintiffs from bringing or further prosecuting asbestos products liability actions against affiliates of GST, including EnPro, Coltec and all their subsidiaries, during the pendency of the GST Chapter 11 Case, subject to further order. As a result, except as a result of the resolution of appeals from verdicts rendered prior to the GST Petition Date and the elimination of claims as a result of information obtained in the GST Chapter 11 Case, the numbers of asbestos claims pending against our subsidiaries had not changed since the GST Petition Date.

~~Joint Plan of Reorganization. On March 17, 2016, EnPro announced that it had reached a comprehensive settlement (the “Consensual Settlement”) to resolve current~~ and future asbestos ~~claims. The settlement was reached with the court-appointed committee representing current~~claims through court approval of a plan of reorganization to establish a facility to resolve and pay these asbestos claimants (the “GST Committee”) and the court-appointed legal representative of future asbestos claimants (the “GST FCR”) in the GST Chapter 11 Case. Representatives for current and future asbestos claimants (the “Coltec Representatives”)claims.

These claims against ~~Coltec also joined in the settlement. Under the settlement, the GST Committee, the GST FCR and the Coltec Representatives agreed to join~~ GST and ~~Coltec in proposing the Joint Plan and~~other subsidiaries were resolved pursuant to ~~ask asbestos claimants and the court to approve the Joint Plan. The Joint Plan was~~a joint plan of reorganization (the "Joint Plan") filed with the Bankruptcy Court which was consummated on ~~May 20, 2016 and amendments to the Joint Plan were filed with the Bankruptcy Court on June 21, 2016,~~ July 29, ~~2016, December 2, 2016, April 3, 2017, May 14, 2017, May 19, 2017, June 8, 2017, and June 9,~~ 2017. As so modified, the Joint Plan superseded all prior plans of reorganization filed by GST with the Bankruptcy Court. The Joint Plan was consummated and became effective at 12:01 a.m. on July 31, 2017 (the “Joint Plan Effective Date”).

Before the Joint Plan could be consummated, it was required to be approved by the Bankruptcy Court and the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina (the "District Court") after a vote of GST asbestos claimants and Coltec asbestos claimants in favor of the Joint Plan by 75% or more in number and at least two-thirds (2/3) in dollar amount of claims that were actually voted.

The Consensual Settlement and Joint Plan provided that the Joint Plan was a prepackaged plan of reorganization as to Coltec/OldCo and that Coltec would undertake a corporate restructuring (the "Coltec Restructuring") and commence a Chapter 11 case to obtain confirmation of the Joint Plan if Coltec asbestos claimants and GST asbestos claimants voted in sufficient numbers to approve the Joint Plan. Accordingly, the Coltec asbestos claimants and GST asbestos claimants were solicited simultaneously for their vote on the approval of the Joint Plan prior to the filing of a Chapter 11 case by Coltec or OldCo. The solicitation process to obtain approval of the asbestos claimants was completed successfully on December 9, 2016, with 95.85% in number and 95.80% in amount of claims held by asbestos claimants casting valid ballots voting in favor of approval of the Joint Plan.

The Joint Plan and Consensual Settlement contemplated that, as an appropriate and necessary step to facilitate the implementation of the Consensual Settlement and not to delay or hinder creditors or the resolution of claims, Coltec would, subject to the receipt of necessary consents, undergo the Coltec Restructuring in which all of its significant operating assets and subsidiaries, which included each of our major business units, would be distributed to a new direct EnPro subsidiary, EnPro Holdings. EnPro Holdings would also assume all of Coltec’s non-asbestos liabilities. The Coltec Restructuring was completed on December 31, 2016, and included the merger of Coltec with and into OldCo, which was a direct subsidiary of EnPro Holdings. OldCo, as the restructured entity, retained responsibility for all asbestos claims and rights to certain insurance assets of Coltec, as well as the business operated by our EnPro Learning System, LLC subsidiary (“EnPro Learning System”), which provides occupational safety training and consulting services to third parties. EnPro Learning System was also merged into OldCo.

On May 15, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court announced its decision recommending that the District Court confirm the Joint Plan. On June 12, 2017, the District Court issued an order confirming the Joint Plan. Prior to the Joint Plan Effective Date, the period for the filing of notice of appeal of the District Court’s confirmation order expired, with no appeal having been filed.

Pursuant to the Joint Plan, a trust (the “Trust”) was established prior to the Joint Plan Effective Date. As contemplated by the Joint Plan, the Trust was funded (i) with aggregate cash contributions by GST LLC and Garrison of $350 million made immediately prior to the Joint Plan Effective Date, (ii) by the contribution made by OldCo immediately prior to the Joint Plan Effective Date of $50 million in cash and an option, exercisable one year after the Joint Plan Effective Date, permitting the Trust to purchase for $1 shares of EnPro common stock having a value of $20 million (with OldCo having the right to call the option for payment of $20 million in cash at any time prior to the first anniversary of the Joint Plan Effective Date, with the Trust having the right to put the option to OldCo for payment by OldCo of $20 million on the day prior to the first anniversary of the Joint Plan Effective Date and with the option terminating on the second anniversary of the Joint Plan Effective Date in return for payment to the Trust of $20 million), and (iii) by the obligations under the Joint Plan of OldCo to make a deferred contribution of $40 million in cash and of GST LLC and Garrison to make an aggregate deferred contribution of $20 million in cash no later than one year after the Joint Plan Effective Date. These deferred contributions are guaranteed by EnPro and secured by a pledge of 50.1% of the outstanding voting equity interests of GST LLC and Garrison.

~~The~~Joint Plan permanently resolves current and future asbestos claims against GST LLC, Garrison and OldCo, as the successor by merger to Coltec, and injunctions issued under the Joint Plan protect all of EnPro and its subsidiaries from those claims, which claims are enjoined under Section 524(g) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Under the Joint Plan, the Trust has assumed responsibility for all present and future asbestos claims arising from the operations or products of GST LLC, Garrison or Coltec/OldCo. Under the Joint Plan, EnPro, through its subsidiaries, retained ownership of OldCo, GST LLC and Garrison. Anchor, which has not conducted business operations for many years and had nominal assets, has been dissolved.

~~The Consensual Settlement included as a condition to our obligations to proceed with the settlement that EnPro, Coltec,~~ GST and Garlock of Canada Ltd (an indirect subsidiary of GST LLC) enter into a written agreement, to be consummated concurrently with the consummation of the Joint Plan on the Joint Plan Effective Date, with the Canadian provincial workers’ compensation boards (the “Provincial Boards”) resolving remedies the Provincial Boards may possess against Garlock of Canada Ltd, GST, Coltec or any of their affiliates, including releases and covenants not to sue, for any present or future asbestos-related claim, and that the agreement is either approved by the Bankruptcy Court following notice to interested parties or the Bankruptcy Court concludes that its approval is not required. On November 11, 2016, we entered into such an agreement (the “Canadian Settlement”) with the Provincial Boards to resolve current and future claims against EnPro GST, Garrison, Coltec, and Garlock of Canada Ltd for recovery of a portion of amounts the Provincial Boards have paid and will pay in the future under asbestos-injury recovery statutes in Canada for claims relating to asbestos-containing products. The Canadian Settlement provides for an aggregate cash settlement payment to the Provincial Boards of $20 million (U.S.), payable on the fourth anniversary of the effective date of the Joint Plan. Under the Canadian Settlement, after the effective date of the Joint Plan, the Provincial Boards had the option of accelerating the payment, in which case the amount payable would be discounted from the fourth anniversary of the effective date of the Joint Plan to the payment date at a discount rate of 4.5% per annum. In return, the Provincial Boards have separately agreed to provide a covenant not to sue EnPro, any of EnPro’s affiliates or the Trust for any present or future asbestos-related claims. On February 3, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order approving

the Canadian Settlement. Prior to the Joint Plan Effective Date, the Provincial Boards provided notice of their election to accelerate the payment. After application of the discount resulting from such acceleration of payment, the settlement payment of approximately $16.7 million (U.S.) was made to the Provincial Boards on August 11, 2017.

~~Under the Consensual Settlement and Joint Plan, GST and OldCo~~Holdings retained their rights to seek reimbursement under insurance policies for any amounts they have paid in the past to resolve asbestos claims, ~~and for $480 million in aggregate~~including contributions ~~they will make~~made to the ~~Trust~~asbestos claims resolution trust established under the Joint ~~Plan.~~Plan (the "Trust"). These policies include a number of primary and excess general liability insurance policies that were purchased by ~~Coltec~~EnPro Holdings and were in effect prior to January 1, 1976 (the “Pre-Garlock Coverage Block”). The policies provide coverage for “occurrences” happening during the policy periods and cover losses associated with product liability claims against ~~Coltec~~EnPro Holdings and certain of its subsidiaries. Asbestos claims against GST are not covered under these policies because GST was not a ~~Coltec~~ subsidiary of EnPro Holdings prior to 1976. The Joint Plan provides that ~~OldCo~~EnPro Holdings may retain the first $25 million of any settlements and judgments collected for non-GST asbestos claims related to insurance policies in the Pre-Garlock Coverage Block and ~~OldCo~~EnPro Holdings and the Trust will share equally in any settlements and judgments ~~OldCo~~EnPro Holdings may collect in excess of $25 million. To date, EnPro Holdings has collected almost $22 million in settlements for non-GST asbestos claims from the Pre-Garlock Coverage Block and anticipates further collections once the Trust begins making claims payments.

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2019, approximately ~~$44.4~~$6.7 million of available products hazard limits or insurance receivables ~~arising from settlements with insurance carriers~~ existed under primary and excess general liability insurance policies other than the Pre-Garlock Coverage Block (the "Garlock Coverage Block") from solvent carriers with investment grade ~~ratings.~~

On June 12, 2017, the District Court approved several settlements with insurance carriers. First, with respect to available products hazard limits and insurance receivables covering claims against both GST and OldCo under the Garlock Coverage Block, the District Court approved settlements with two carriers that will pay their full aggregate remaining policy limits of approximately $18.8 million over a three-year period following consummation of the Joint Plan. A previously disclosed agreement with another group of carriers calls for the payment of $11 million. EnPro expects that the full amount of remaining policy limits and insurance receivables (approximately $19.2 million) in the Garlock Coverage Block will be received either through settlements or in reimbursement of GST’s plan funding as payments are made by the asbestos trust.

In addition, the District Court approved settlements with two insurance carriers in the Pre-Garlock Coverage Block that permit the recovery of some of OldCo’s $110 million of contributions to the Trust under the Joint Plan. Under the settlements, the two carriers were obligated to make one-time cash payments to OldCo in the aggregate amount of approximately $19.0 million within 30 days of consummation of the Joint Plan,ratings, which payments were made in August 2017. In addition, the District Court approved a settlement with the successors to Coltec’s Fairbanks Morse Pump business in which the Fairbanks Morse Pump successors agreed to pay OldCo $6 million in three installments over nine years following consummation of the Joint Plan, with the successor entities being entitled to recoup up to the full amount of their payments to OldCo from collections expected to be received from an additional insurance carrier that issued general liability policies to Coltec prior to January 1, 1976. OldCo and the Trust will share equally in any collections above that $6 million amount. OldCo estimates that the carrier will owe approximately $11 million in reimbursements over the life of the Trust for its share of Coltec claims (which includes Fairbanks Morse Pump claims). In August 2017, the Fairbanks Morse Pump successors and EnPro Holdings, as the successor to OldCo, agreed to permit accelerated settlements of the installments upon the lump sum payment of $3 million made to EnPro Holdings in August 2017, with the Fairbanks Morse Pump successors surrendering any right to recoup the amount of such payment from the additional insurance carrier that issued general liability policies to Coltec prior to January 1, 1976.

~~Insurance Coverage Available to GST. At~~ ~~September 30, 2017, we had $44.4 million of insurance coverage~~ we believe is available to cover GST asbestos claims payments and certain expense payments, including contributions to the Trust. ~~GST has collected insurance payments totaling $152.3 million since the GST Petition Date.~~ We consider ~~the~~ ~~$44.4 million~~such amount of available insurance coverage ~~remaining~~under the Garlock Coverage Block to be of high quality because the insurance policies are written or guaranteed by U.S.-based carriers whose credit rating by S&P is investment grade (BBB-) or better, and whose AM Best rating is excellent (A-) or better. ~~Of the~~ ~~$44.4~~The remaining $6.7 million, ~~$8.3 million~~ is ~~allocated to claims that were paid by GST LLC prior to the initiation of the Chapter 11 Case and submitted to insurance companies for reimbursement, and the remainder is allocated~~available to pending and estimated future claims. There are specific

agreements in place with carriers ~~covering~~ ~~$29.4 million~~ ofregarding the remaining available coverage. Based on those agreements and the terms of the policies in place and prior decisions concerning coverage, we believe that all of the ~~$44.4 million~~ of insurance proceeds will ultimately be collected, although there can be no assurance that the insurance companies will make the payments as and when due. Based on those agreements and policies, some of which define specific annual amounts to be paid and others of which limit the amount that can be recovered in any one year, we anticipate that ~~$19.2 million~~ will be received either through settlements or in reimbursements of GST's plan funding as payments are made by the asbestos trust. Assuming the insurers pay according to the agreements and policies, we anticipate that the following amounts should be collected in the years set out below:

~~2018 –~~ ~~$16.8 million~~

~~2019 – $5.9 million~~

~~2020 – $2.5 million~~

We are a party to legal proceedings initiated in August 2017 in the District Court with two insurers that collectively provide $15 million of coverage in the Garlock Coverage Block. The legal proceedings were initiated by one of the insurers seeking to compel arbitration of issues under its policy and, alternatively, a determination that its policy does not cover asbestos claims. We have counterclaimed, seeking a determination that the policy covers asbestos claims and that the insurer breached the terms of its policy by failing to provide coverage for these claims. We joined the second insurer in this action and are seeking similar relief against it. The magistrate judge recently issued a decision denying the petitioning insurer's motion to compel arbitration, and holding that the arbitration clause in the policy was deleted by an endorsement. We expect the insurer to seek review of that ruling by the district court judge.

~~GST LLC has received~~ ~~$8.8 million~~ ~~of insurance recoveries from insolvent carriers since 2007, and may receive additional payments from insolvent carriers in the future. No anticipated insolvent carrier collections are included in the~~ ~~$44.4 million~~ of anticipated collections. The insurance available to cover current and future asbestos claims is from comprehensive general liability policies that cover OldCo, as the successor to Coltec, and certain of its other subsidiaries in addition to GST LLC for periods prior to 1985 and therefore could be subject to potential competing claims of other covered subsidiaries and their assignees.


~~18.~~	~~Supplemental Guarantor Financial Information~~

In September 2014, we completed the offering of the Senior Notes and in March 2017 we completed the offering of the Additional Notes. The Senior Notes and the Additional Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured, unsubordinated, joint and several basis by our existing and future wholly owned direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries, that are each guarantors of our Revolving Credit Facility (collectively, the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”). Our subsidiaries organized outside of the United States, (collectively, the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”) do not guarantee the Senior Notes or the Additional Notes. A Guarantor Subsidiary's guarantee is subject to release in certain circumstances, including (i) the sale, disposition, exchange or other transfer (including through merger, consolidation, amalgamation or otherwise) of the capital stock of the subsidiary made in a manner not in violation of the indenture governing the Senior Notes and the Additional Notes; (ii) the designation of the subsidiary as an “Unrestricted Subsidiary” under the indenture governing the Senior Notes and the Additional Notes; (iii) the legal defeasance or covenant defeasance of the Senior Notes and the Additional Notes in accordance with the terms of the indenture; or (iv) the subsidiary ceasing to be our subsidiary as a result of any foreclosure of any pledge or security interest securing our Revolving Credit Facility or other exercise of remedies in respect thereof.

~~ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)~~

~~Quarter Ended September 30, 2017~~

~~(in millions)~~

Guarantor Non-guarantor
Parent Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
Net sales $ —
$ 244.3
$ 133.0
$ (33.6 ) $ 343.7
Cost of sales —
173.1
89.0
(33.6 ) 228.5
Gross profit —
71.2
44.0
—
115.2
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative 9.4
45.9
30.4
—
85.7
Other 0.7
9.7
0.6
—
11.0
Total operating expenses 10.1
55.6
31.0
—
96.7
Operating income (loss) (10.1 ) 15.6
13.0
—
18.5
Interest income (expense), net (6.8 ) (4.2 ) 0.7
—
(10.3 )
Gain on reconsolidation of GST and OldCo —
534.4
—
534.4
Other expense —
(1.9 ) —
—
(1.9 )
Income (loss) before income taxes (16.9 ) 543.9
13.7
—
540.7
Income tax benefit (expense) 5.2
(35.2 ) (20.5 ) —
(50.5 )
Income (loss) before equity in earnings of subsidiaries (11.7 ) 508.7
(6.8 ) —
490.2
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net of tax 501.9
(6.8 ) —
(495.1 ) —
Net income (loss) $ 490.2
$ 501.9
$ (6.8 ) $ (495.1 ) $ 490.2
Comprehensive income (loss) $ 494.9
$ 506.6
$ (3.5 ) $ (503.1 ) $ 494.9

~~ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)~~

~~Quarter Ended September 30, 2016~~

~~(in millions)~~

Guarantor Non-guarantor
Parent Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
Net sales $ —
$ 207.1
$ 105.1
$ (19.5 ) $ 292.7
Cost of sales —
144.8
68.8
(19.5 ) 194.1
Gross profit —
62.3
36.3
—
98.6
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative 6.3
37.9
26.7
—
70.9
Other 0.4
0.1
1.9
—
2.4
Total operating expenses 6.7
38.0
28.6
—
73.3
Operating income (loss) (6.7 ) 24.3
7.7
—
25.3
Interest expense, net (4.7 ) (9.3 ) —
—
(14.0 )
Other expense —
(1.2 ) (0.1 ) —
(1.3 )
Income (loss) before income taxes (11.4 ) 13.8
7.6
—
10.0
Income tax benefit (expense) 8.4
(8.2 ) (4.2 ) —
(4.0 )
Income (loss) before equity in earnings of subsidiaries (3.0 ) 5.6
3.4
—
6.0
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net of tax 9.0
3.4
—
(12.4 ) —
Net income $ 6.0
$ 9.0
$ 3.4
$ (12.4 ) $ 6.0
Comprehensive income $ 6.6
$ 9.5
$ 3.0
$ (12.5 ) $ 6.6

~~ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)~~

~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017~~

~~(in millions)~~

Guarantor Non-guarantor
Parent Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
Net sales $ —
$ 663.4
$ 358.2
$ (74.5 ) $ 947.1
Cost of sales —
465.5
234.8
(74.5 ) 625.8
Gross profit —
197.9
123.4
—
321.3
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative 23.4
127.0
82.3
—
232.7
Other 1.4
10.7
3.3
—
15.4
Total operating expenses 24.8
137.7
85.6
—
248.1
Operating income (loss) (24.8 ) 60.2
37.8
—
73.2
Interest expense, net (18.5 ) (22.7 ) —
—
(41.2 )
Gain on reconsolidation of GST and OldCo —
534.4
—
—
534.4
Other expense —
(5.1 ) —
—
(5.1 )
Income (loss) before income taxes (43.3 ) 566.8
37.8
—
561.3
Income tax benefit (expense) 15.2
(44.6 ) (26.3 ) —
(55.7 )
Income (loss) before equity in earnings of subsidiaries (28.1 ) 522.2
11.5
—
505.6
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net of tax 533.7
11.5
—
(545.2 ) —
Net income $ 505.6
$ 533.7
$ 11.5
$ (545.2 ) $ 505.6
Comprehensive income $ 525.7
$ 553.8
$ 28.1
$ (581.9 ) $ 525.7

~~ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)~~

~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016~~

~~(in millions)~~

Guarantor Non-guarantor
Parent Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Eliminations Consolidated
Net sales $ —
$ 630.2
$ 333.9
$ (63.3 ) $ 900.8
Cost of sales —
442.0
218.0
(63.3 ) 596.7
Gross profit —
188.2
115.9
—
304.1
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative 20.8
124.2
86.7
—
231.7
Asbestos settlement —
80.0
—
—
80.0
Other 1.7
2.9
5.8
—
10.4
Total operating expenses 22.5
207.1
92.5
—
322.1
Operating income (loss) (22.5 ) (18.9 ) 23.4
—
(18.0 )
Interest expense, net (13.9 ) (26.9 ) (0.2 ) —
(41.0 )
Other expense —
(5.1 ) (0.3 ) —
(5.4 )
Income (loss) before income taxes (36.4 ) (50.9 ) 22.9
—
(64.4 )
Income tax benefit (expense) 13.1
28.3
(14.2 ) —
27.2
Income (loss) before equity in earnings of subsidiaries (23.3 ) (22.6 ) 8.7
—
(37.2 )
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries, net of tax (13.9 ) 8.7
—
5.2
—
Net income (loss) $ (37.2 ) $ (13.9 ) $ 8.7
$ 5.2
$ (37.2 )
Comprehensive income (loss) $ (38.6 ) $ (15.4 ) $ 4.2
$ 11.2
$ (38.6 )

~~ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)~~

~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017~~

~~(in millions)~~

Guarantor
Non-guarantor

Parent
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES $ (103.2 )
$ 94.8

$ 72.9

$ (0.1 )
$ 64.4
INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Purchases of property, plant and equipment —

(17.6 )
(6.0 )
—

(23.6 )
Payments for capitalized internal-use software —

(2.6 )
—

—

(2.6 )
Payments for acquisitions —
(39.5 ) —
—
(39.5 )
Reconsolidation of GST and OldCo —
41.1
—
41.1
Deconsolidation of OldCo —
(4.8 ) —
—
(4.8 )
Capital contribution to OldCo —
(45.2 ) —
—
(45.2 )
Other —

—

0.4

—

0.4
Net cash used in investing activities —

(68.6 )
(5.6 )
—

(74.2 )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Net payments on loans between subsidiaries (20.0 )
32.4

(12.4 )
—

—
Intercompany dividends —

—

(0.1 )
0.1

—
Proceeds from debt 151.5

348.1

3.4

—

503.0
Repayments of debt —

(407.5 )
(1.8 )
—

(409.3 )
Repurchase of common stock (11.5 ) —
—
—
(11.5 )
Dividends paid (14.3 ) —
—
—
(14.3 )
Other (2.5 )
—

—

—

(2.5 )
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 103.2

(27.0 )
(10.9 )
0.1

65.4
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents —

—

9.0

—

9.0
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents —

(0.8 )
65.4

—

64.6
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period —

0.8

110.7

—

111.5
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ —

$ —

$ 176.1

$ —

$ 176.1

~~ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)~~

~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016~~

~~(in millions)~~

Guarantor
Non-guarantor

Parent
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES $ (51.6 )
$ 33.9

$ 25.6

$ —

$ 7.9
INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Purchases of property, plant and equipment —

(19.5 )
(5.1 )
—

(24.6 )
Payments for capitalized internal-use software —

(2.8 )
(0.3 )
—

(3.1 )
Payments for acquisitions —
(25.5 ) (3.0 ) —
(28.5 )
Other —

2.9

0.8

—

3.7
Net cash used in investing activities —

(44.9 )
(7.6 )
—

(52.5 )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Net payments on loans between subsidiaries 94.5
(95.2 )
0.7

—

—
Proceeds from debt —

297.2

6.1

—

303.3
Repayments of debt —

(191.7 )
(1.0 )
—

(192.7 )
Repurchase of common stock (26.2 ) —
—
—
(26.2 )
Dividends paid (13.6 ) —
—
—
(13.6 )
Other (3.1 )
—

—

—

(3.1 )
Net cash provided by financing activities 51.6

10.3

5.8

—

67.7
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents —

—

(11.7 )
—

(11.7 )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents —

(0.7 )
12.1

—

11.4
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period —

0.7

102.7

—

103.4
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ —

$ —

$ 114.8

$ —

$ 114.8

~~ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)~~

~~As of September 30, 2017~~

~~(in millions)~~

Guarantor
Non-guarantor

Parent
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
ASSETS

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents $ —

$ —

$ 176.1

$ —

$ 176.1
Accounts receivable, net 0.1

166.6

81.0

—

247.7
Intercompany receivables —

28.8

9.6

(38.4 )
—
Inventories —

141.0

69.8

—

210.8
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 33.2

27.4

24.1

(13.3 )
71.4
Total current assets 33.3

363.8

360.6

(51.7 )
706.0
Property, plant and equipment, net —

200.4

83.8

—

284.2
Goodwill —

267.9

76.8

—

344.7
Other intangible assets, net —

290.6

62.7

—

353.3
Intercompany receivables —

9.8

5.2

(15.0 )
—
Investment in subsidiaries 1,305.4

449.9

—

(1,755.3 )
—
Other assets 19.1

121.0

14.2

(0.1 )
154.2
Total assets $ 1,357.8

$ 1,703.4

$ 603.3

$ (1,822.1 )
$ 1,842.4
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Current liabilities

Current maturities of long-term debt $ —

$ 0.2

$ —

$ —

$ 0.2
Accounts payable 4.4

68.1

39.3

—

111.8
Intercompany payables —

9.6

28.8

(38.4 )
—
Asbestos liability —
80.0
—
—
80.0
Accrued expenses 13.5

71.1

48.4

(13.3 )
119.7
Total current liabilities 17.9

229.0

116.5

(51.7 )
311.7
Long-term debt 444.0

116.4

—

—

560.4
Intercompany payables 15.0

—

—

(15.0 )
—
Other liabilities 14.4

52.6

36.9

(0.1 )
103.8
Total liabilities 491.3

398.0

153.4

(66.8 )
975.9
Shareholders’ equity 866.5

1,305.4

449.9

(1,755.3 )
866.5
Total liabilities and equity $ 1,357.8

$ 1,703.4

$ 603.3

$ (1,822.1 )
$ 1,842.4

~~ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)~~

~~As of December 31, 2016~~

~~(in millions)~~

Guarantor
Non-guarantor

Parent
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries
Eliminations
Consolidated
ASSETS

Current assets

Cash and cash equivalents $ —

$ 0.8

$ 110.7

$ —

$ 111.5
Accounts receivable, net 0.2

151.2

56.7

—

208.1
Intercompany receivables —

10.2

4.7

(14.9 )
—
Inventories —

125.9

49.5

—

175.4
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 21.3

8.9

17.4

(17.7 )
29.9
Total current assets 21.5

297.0

239.0

(32.6 )
524.9
Property, plant and equipment, net 0.1

148.5

66.8

—

215.4
Goodwill —

175.5

26.0

—

201.5
Other intangible assets, net —

156.5

20.4

—

176.9
Investment in GST —

236.9

—

—

236.9
Intercompany receivables —

43.6

1.5

(45.1 )
—
Investment in subsidiaries 681.1

236.4

—

(917.5 )
—
Other assets 16.4

156.2

18.2

—

190.8
Total assets $ 719.1

$ 1,450.6

$ 371.9

$ (995.2 )
$ 1,546.4
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

Current liabilities

Short-term borrowings from GST $ —

$ —

$ 26.2

$ —

$ 26.2
Notes payable to GST —

12.7

—

—

12.7
Current maturities of long-term debt —

0.2

—

—

0.2
Accounts payable 2.3

61.9

38.7

—

102.9
Intercompany payables —

4.7

10.2

(14.9 )
—
Accrued expenses 15.3

130.1

33.3

(17.7 )
161.0
Total current liabilities 17.6

209.6

108.4

(32.6 )
303.0
Long-term debt 294.1

130.7

—

—

424.8
Notes payable to GST —

283.2

—

—

283.2
Intercompany payables 35.0

1.4

8.7

(45.1 )
—
Other liabilities 13.9

144.6

18.4

—

176.9
Total liabilities 360.6

769.5

135.5

(77.7 )
1,187.9
Shareholders’ equity 358.5

681.1

236.4

(917.5 )
358.5
Total liabilities and equity $ 719.1

$ 1,450.6

$ 371.9

$ (995.2 )
$ 1,546.4


~~Item 2.~~	~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.~~

~~Forward-Looking Information~~

~~general economic conditions in the markets served by our businesses, some of which are cyclical and experience periodic downturns;~~

~~prices and availability of raw materials;~~

~~the impact of fluctuations in currency exchange rates; and~~

the amount of any payments required to satisfy contingent liabilities related to discontinued operations of our predecessors, including liabilities for certain products, environmental matters, employee benefit obligations and other matters.

~~We caution our shareholders not to place undue reliance on these statements, which speak only as of the date on which such statements were made.~~

~~Overview and Outlook~~

~~Overview. We design, develop, manufacture, service and market proprietary engineered industrial products. We have 57 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, including the United States.~~

~~We manage our business as three segments: a Sealing Products segment, an Engineered Products segment, and a Power Systems segment.~~

Our Sealing Products segment designs, manufactures and sells sealing products, including: metallic, non-metallic and composite material gaskets, dynamic seals, compression packing, resilient metal seals, elastomeric seals, hydraulic components, expansion joints, flange sealing and isolation products, pipeline casing spacers/isolators, casing end seals, modular sealing systems for sealing pipeline penetrations, sanitary gaskets, hoses and fittings for the hygienic process industries, hole forming products, manhole infiltration sealing systems, bellows and bellows assemblies, pedestals for semiconductor manufacturing, custom-engineered mechanical seals for applications in the aerospace industry and other markets, PTFE products, and heavy-duty commercial vehicle parts used in the wheel-end, braking, suspension, and tire and mileage optimization systems. These products are used in a variety of industries, including chemical and petrochemical processing, petroleum extraction and refining, pulp and paper processing, power generation, food and pharmaceutical processing, primary metal manufacturing, mining, water and waste treatment, heavy-duty trucking, aerospace, medical, filtration and semiconductor fabrication. In many of these industries, performance and durability are vital for safety and environmental protection. Many of our products are used in highly demanding applications, e.g., where extreme temperatures, extreme pressures, corrosive environments, strict tolerances, and/or worn equipment make product performance difficult.

Our Power Systems segment designs, manufactures, sells and services heavy-duty, medium-speed diesel, natural gas and dual fuel reciprocating engines. The United States government and the general markets for marine propulsion, power generation, and pump and compressor applications use these products and services.

The historical business operations of certain of our subsidiaries, principally GST LLC and Anchor, have resulted in a substantial volume of asbestos litigation in which plaintiffs have alleged personal injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos fibers.

On June 5, 2010 (the “GST Petition Date”), our subsidiaries, Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC (“GST LLC”), The Anchor Packing Company (“Anchor”) and Garrison Litigation Management Group, Ltd. (“Garrison,” and, together with GST LLC and Anchor, "GST") filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "GST Chapter 11 Case") in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina in Charlotte (the “Bankruptcy Court”). GST LLC is one of the businesses in our broader Garlock group and, prior to the Petition Date, was included in our Sealing Products segment. GST LLC and its subsidiaries operate five manufacturing facilities, including operations in Palmyra, New York and Houston, Texas. The filings on the GST Petition Date did not include EnPro Industries, Inc. or any other EnPro Industries, Inc. operating subsidiary.

The filings were the initial step in a claims resolution process for an efficient and permanent resolution of pending and future asbestos claims through court approval of a plan of reorganization to establish a facility to resolve and pay all GST asbestos claims. On March 17, 2016, we announced that we had reached a comprehensive consensual settlement to resolve current and future asbestos claims. This comprehensive consensual settlement and details of the plans of reorganization filed in the GST Chapter 11 Case, including the joint plan of reorganization (the “Joint Plan”) filed pursuant to the comprehensive consensual settlement and consummated on July 31, 2017, are described below and in "- Contingencies - Subsidiary Asbestos Bankruptcies.” As contemplated by the Joint Plan, on January 30, 2017 (the “OldCo Petition Date”), our subsidiary, OldCo, LLC ("OldCo"), as the successor by merger to our Coltec Industries Inc subsidiary (“Coltec”), filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition with the Bankruptcy Court (the “OldCo Chapter 11 Case”). On February 3, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order for the joint administration of the OldCo Chapter 11 Case with the GST Chapter 11 Case.

During the pendency of the GST Chapter 11 Case and the OldCo Chapter 11 Case, certain actions proposed to be taken by GST or OldCo not in the ordinary course of business were subject to approval by the Bankruptcy Court. As a result, during the pendency of the GST Chapter 11 Case and the OldCo Chapter 11 Case, we did not have exclusive control over these companies. Accordingly, as required by GAAP, GST was deconsolidated beginning on the GST Petition Date and OldCo was deconsolidated beginning on the OldCo Petition Date. Accordingly the financial results of GST and its subsidiaries were included in our consolidated results through June 4, 2010, the day prior to the GST Petition Date, and the financial results of OldCo and its subsidiaries included in our consolidated results through January 29, 2017, the day prior to the OldCo Petition Date. GST and OldCo were reconsolidated effective upon the effective date of the consummation of the Joint Plan, which effective date was 12:01 a.m. on July 31, 2017.

The reconsolidation of GST and OldCo was treated as a business acquisition in accordance with applicable accounting rules. The purchase price for the acquisition was equal to the fair value of our investment in GST and OldCo on the reconsolidation date. Associated with the reconsolidation of GST and OldCo, we recorded a pretax gain of $534.4 million. The gain on revaluation of our investment in GST and OldCo is the difference between the above-noted fair value of the investment and its book value of $236.9 million as of the date of reconsolidation as well as the elimination of the net amounts payable to GST and OldCo at the reconsolidation date.

The primary businesses comprising GST will be managed as part of the Garlock division within our Sealing Products segment. Smaller businesses also reconsolidated with GST will be managed by the Technetics and Stemco divisions within this segment, by the Compressor Products International ("CPI") division within our Engineered Products segment, and by the Fairbanks Morse division, which comprises our Power Systems segment.

The assets and liabilities of both GST and OldCo are reconsolidated into the EnPro balance sheet at their estimated fair value in accordance with authoritative guidance on business acquisitions. As a result, EnPro’s consolidated financial statements include the sales, income, expenses and cash flows of both GST and OldCo beginning on July 31, 2017. Periods prior to that date are not restated to include GST and OldCo’s results.

The EDF contract also includes contractual penalties for late delivery and our profitability under the contract could be adversely affected if we are not timely in performing our obligations under the contract and the penalties apply. In addition, our profitability could be adversely affected if we do not realize certain internal efficiency gains that we anticipate achieving while performing under the contract.

We review the carrying amounts of long-lived assets when certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. In consideration of the poor performance of the ATDynamics ("ATD") business, an asset group in the Stemco division of our Sealing Products segment, for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 and significantly lowered expectations for the fourth quarter forecast and the budget for fiscal year 2018, we determined that a test of ATD's recoverability was required.

As a result of this test, certain of ATD's definite-lived intangible assets were determined to be impaired, resulting in an impairment loss of $10.1 million, which equaled the excess of these assets' net book value at September 30, 2017 over their fair value. The loss is reflected in other expense (operating) on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

In 2015, we launched a focused effort to restructure underperforming units. The initial effort focused on exiting and consolidating certain facilities in the Engineered Products segment and selectively reducing cost in the Sealing Products segment. The associated activities were substantially completed by the end of the second quarter of 2016. During the quarter ended June 30, 2016, an additional company-wide initiative to reduce cost across all operating segments and the corporate office was initiated. Although these company-wide cost reduction efforts launched in 2015 and 2016 have been completed, we continue to pursue numerous segment and corporate cost-savings initiatives on an ongoing basis.

~~Outlook~~

We continue to experience strengthening conditions in several of our core end markets, and our teams are executing well on their defined growth strategies. While five of our facilities within the Sealing Products and Engineered Products segments were adversely impacted by hurricanes in Houston and Florida during the third quarter, all facilities were fully operational within two weeks of the storms. The impact of the storms, including costs associated with property damage and the contribution margin on lost sales, was approximately $2 million. Losses in Houston exceeded our insurance deductible, and we expect insurance recovery in excess of $1 million. This expected recovery is not reflected in the accompanying financial statements. No insurance recovery is expected for our losses at two facilities in Florida, as the losses were less than our insurance deductible.

We continue to be encouraged by the positive financial performance in our Sealing Products and Engineered Products segments in the third quarter, driven by increased volumes and manufacturing efficiencies. Additionally, in Power Systems, we expect continued improved activity in the fourth quarter versus 2016 largely driven by production scheduling for key programs and increases in aftermarket parts and service.

We remain committed to our strategy to create shareholder value through earnings growth and balanced capital allocation, including disciplined investments for organic growth and innovation, strategic bolt-on acquisitions, and returning capital to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. Additionally, we invested approximately $11.5 million in share repurchases for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and funded a $0.22 per share dividend in each of the first three quarters of this year.

Our effective tax rate is directly impacted by the relative proportions of revenue and income before taxes in the jurisdictions in which we operate. In addition, the rate can be magnified by pre-tax losses in high tax jurisdictions offset somewhat by pre-tax profits in low tax jurisdictions. Based on the expected geographical mix of domestic losses and foreign earnings, we anticipate our annual effective tax rate for 2017 will range from 8% to 13%, inclusive of the gain recognized on the reconsolidation of the GST and OldCo entities.

Unusual or discrete tax events including the reconsolidation of the GST and OldCo entities may cause our effective rate to fluctuate on a quarterly basis. Certain events, including, for example, acquisitions and other business changes, which are difficult to predict, may also cause our effective tax rate to fluctuate. We are subject to changing tax laws, regulations, and interpretations in multiple jurisdictions. Corporate tax reform continues to be a priority in the U.S. and other jurisdictions. Changes to the tax system in the U.S. could have significant effects, positive and negative, on our effective tax rate, and on our deferred tax assets and liabilities.

We estimate pension expense for the full year of 2017 will be approximately $5 million, which would be approximately $1 million less than in 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we contributed $8.8 million to our U.S. defined benefit pension plan. This figure excludes $0.7 million of contributions to the Garlock pension plan prior to the reconsolidation of GST. Based upon available information, which is subject to change, we do not expect to make any contributions to our U.S. defined benefit pension plans in the fourth quarter of 2017.

In connection with our growth strategy, we will continue to evaluate making additional acquisitions; however, the effect of such acquisitions cannot be predicted and therefore is not reflected in this outlook.

Our actions to permanently resolve asbestos claims are discussed in greater detail below in “- Contingencies - Subsidiary Asbestos Bankruptcies” and our estimate of the range of contingent liabilities associated with such claims and accruals in connection with changes in that estimate are discussed below in “— Contingencies — Asbestos — Liability Estimate.”

~~Results of Operations~~

Quarters Ended
September 30, Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
(in millions)
Sales
Sealing Products $ 213.7
$ 175.3
$ 584.3
$ 532.6
Engineered Products 75.5
65.7
226.3
213.5
Power Systems 55.4
52.5
139.4
157.2
344.6
293.5
950.0
903.3
Intersegment sales (0.9 ) (0.8 ) (2.9 ) (2.5 )
Net sales $ 343.7
$ 292.7
$ 947.1
$ 900.8
Segment Profit
Sealing Products $ 23.5
$ 23.1
$ 65.0
$ 62.4
Engineered Products 7.7
2.9
25.4
10.4
Power Systems 8.2
7.3
20.6
15.5
Total segment profit 39.4
33.3
111.0
88.3
Corporate expenses (9.7 ) (6.4 ) (24.3 ) (21.9 )
Asbestos settlement —
—
—
(80.0 )
Gain on reconsolidation of GST and OldCo 534.4
—
534.4
—
Interest expense, net (10.3 ) (14.0 ) (41.2 ) (41.0 )
Other expense, net (13.1 ) (2.9 ) (18.6 ) (9.8 )
Income (loss) before income taxes $ 540.7
$ 10.0
$ 561.3
$ (64.4 )

Other expense, net in the table above contains all items included in other (operating) expense and other expense (non-operating) on our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 with the exception of $0.4 million, $2.2 million, $3.8 million, and $9.2 million respectively, of restructuring costs. As noted previously, restructuring costs are considered to be a part of segment profit. Additionally, other expense, net in the table above for the quarters ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 also includes $0.6 million, $1.4 million, $1.9 million and $3.2 million respectively, of miscellaneous expenses that are either not associated with a particular segment or not considered part of administering the corporate headquarters. These expenses are included in selling, general and administrative expense on our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

~~Third Quarter of 2017 Compared to the Third Quarter of 2016~~

Sales of $343.7 million in the third quarter of 2017 increased 17.4% from $292.7 million in the third quarter of 2016. The following table summarizes the impact of acquisitions and divestitures and foreign currency on sales by segment:

Sales Percent Change Third Quarter 2017 vs. Third Quarter 2016
increase/(decrease) Acquisitions/Divestiture Reconsolidation of GST and OldCo
Foreign
Currency
Organic Total
EnPro Industries, Inc. 0.2 % 12.1 % 1.0 % 4.1 % 17.4 %
Sealing Products 0.3 % 19.1 % 0.6 % 1.9 % 21.9 %
Engineered Products — % 0.3 % 3.0 % 11.6 % 14.9 %
Power Systems — % 3.5 % — % 2.0 % 5.5 %

~~Following are the key effects of acquisitions and divestiture (aside from the reconsolidation of GST and OldCo) on sales for the third quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016:~~

~~Acquisition of Qualiseal in the second quarter of 2017 in the Sealing Products segment; and~~

~~Divestiture of our Franken Plastik business unit previously included in the Sealing Products segment at the end of 2016~~

~~See below for additional discussion on segment sales and segment profits.~~

Corporate expenses for the third quarter of 2017 increased $3.3 million as compared to the same period in 2016 due primarily to increased incentive compensation costs during the quarter associated with higher projected attainment under our long-term incentive program ($1.6 million), higher projected attainment under the 2017 annual incentive plan as compared to the 2016 annual incentive plan ($0.7 million), and increased professional fees ($0.4 million).

Interest expense, net in the third quarter of 2017 decreased by $3.7 million as compared to the same period of 2016, primarily due to lower average outstanding indebtedness due to the resolution of the notes payable to GST through the reconsolidation of GST and OldCo.

Other expense, net in the third quarter of 2017 increased by $10.2 million as compared to the same period of 2016, primarily due mainly to the above-mentioned long-lived asset impairment charge of $10.1 million associated with the ATD business in our Sealing Products segment.

During the third quarter of 2017, our effective tax rate was 9.3% as we recorded income tax expense of $50.5 million on pre-tax income of $540.7 million. The reduction in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the significant discrete items recorded in the current quarter including the $534.4 million non-taxable gain on the reconsolidation of the GST and OldCo entities and the $21.2 million benefit of the reversal of the deferred tax liability initially recorded on our investment in GST when GST was deconsolidated in June 2010. The reduction is partially offset by the $72.7 million charge associated with the step up of GST and OldCo's net assets to fair value upon the reconsolidation.

During the third quarter of 2016, our effective tax rate was 39.6% as we recorded an income tax expense of $4.0 million on pre-tax income of $10.0 million. The volatility in the quarterly tax rate is the result of using annual tax rates derived

from a geographic mix of pre-tax losses and income, as applied to a year-to-date ordinary loss in the prior-year quarter that exceeded the anticipated ordinary loss for the full year. The combination of mix, overall loss limitations, and small denominators resulted in an unusually high effective quarterly rate.

Net income was $490.2 million, or $22.49 per share, in the third quarter of 2017 compared to net income of $6.0 million, or $0.28 per share, in the second quarter of 2016. Earnings per share are expressed on a diluted basis.

~~Following is a discussion of operating results for each segment during the quarter:~~

~~Sealing Products~~. Sales of $213.7 million in the third quarter of 2017 reflect a 21.9% increase compared to the $175.3 million reported in the same quarter of 2016. Sales to third parties from the reconsolidated GST businesses were $33.4 million. Excluding these sales, the benefit of acquisitions net of the divestiture of Franken Plastik ($0.5 million), and favorable foreign exchange translation ($1.1 million), sales were up 1.9% or $3.3 million due to strength in semiconductor, aerospace, food & pharmaceuticals, metals and mining, and general industrial markets, while industrial gas turbines and nuclear markets experienced continued softness in the current year.

Segment profit of $23.5 million in the third quarter of 2017 increased 1.7% from $23.1 million reported in the third quarter of 2016. Operating margins for the segment decreased from 13.2% in the third quarter of 2016 to 11.0% in the third quarter of 2017. Segment profit from the reconsolidated GST businesses was $2.9 million. Excluding this impact, the unfavorable year-over-year impact of acquisitions (net of the divestiture of Franken Plastik) and acquisition-related costs ($0.5 million), the impact of a reduction of an earnout accrual in the comparable prior year period associated with the segment's previous acquisition of Fabrico ($1.5 million), the favorable year-over-year impact of restructuring costs ($0.1 million), and the unfavorable impact of foreign exchange translation ($0.2 million), segment profit was down $0.9 million or 3.4%. The positive impact of the above-mentioned sales increase was more than offset by unfavorable mix when compared to the prior year and by increased manufacturing costs.

~~Engineered Products~~. Sales in the third quarter of 2017 increased 14.9% to $75.5 million from $65.7 million reported in the third quarter of 2016. Sales to third parties from the reconsolidated GST businesses were $0.2 million. Excluding these sales and the impact of favorable foreign exchange translation ($2.0 million), sales were up 11.6% or $7.7 million primarily due to strength in the general industrial, automotive, aerospace, and North American and European oil and gas markets.

Segment profit in the third quarter of 2017 was $7.7 million compared to $2.9 million in the third quarter of 2016, an increase of $4.8 million, or 165.5%. Operating margins for the segment were 10.2%, which was up from the 4.4% reported in the third quarter of 2016. Segment profit from the reconsolidated GST businesses was $0.1 million. Excluding this impact, the favorable impact of current quarter foreign exchange translation ($0.3 million), and the favorable year-over-year impact of restructuring costs ($1.5 million) segment profit increased $2.9 million, or 67.3%, due mainly to the aforementioned sales increase (approximately $5 million). Partially offsetting this impact were increased manufacturing costs ($1.4 million) and increased incentive compensation accruals related to higher projected attainment under 2017 annual incentive plans ($1.0 million).

~~Power Systems~~. Sales of $55.4 million in the third quarter of 2017 increased $2.9 million, or 5.5%, from $52.5 million in the third quarter of 2016. Sales to third parties from the reconsolidated GST businesses were $1.8 million. Excluding these sales, sales increased $1.1 million, or 2.0%. The overall sales increase was driven by increased aftermarket parts and services revenues ($3.6 million) partially offset by a decrease in engine revenues. Price increases positively impacted sales by approximately $1 million.

The segment reported a profit of $8.2 million in the third quarter of 2017 compared to $7.3 million in the third quarter of 2016, a increase of 12.3%. Operating margins for the segment were 14.8% in the third quarter of 2017. Segment profit from the reconsolidated GST businesses was $0.5 million. Excluding this impact, segment profit was positively affected by the mix of higher margin parts sales within total sales for the quarter ($1.3 million), as well as the aforementioned price increases. These factors were offset by an increase in the loss provision on the EDF contract of $0.8 million in the current quarter compared no change in the comparable prior year period, and by lower margin percentages realized on engine contract revenue in comparison to prior year. The assessment of total EDF contract loss for the third quarter of 2017 included a positive foreign exchange effect of $2.3 million due to the weakening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro.

~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 Compared to the Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2016~~

Sales of $947.1 million in the first nine months of 2017 increased 5.1% from $900.8 million in the first nine months of 2016. The following table summarizes the impact of acquisitions and divestitures and foreign currency on sales by segment:

Sales Percent Change Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 vs. Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
increase/(decrease) Acquisitions/Divestiture Reconsolidation of GST and OldCo
Foreign
Currency
Organic Total
EnPro Industries, Inc. 0.5 % 3.9 % (0.4 )% 1.1 % 5.1 %
Sealing Products 0.8 % 6.3 % (0.3 )% 2.9 % 9.7 %
Engineered Products (0.1 )% 0.1 % (0.7 )% 6.7 % 6.0 %
Power Systems — % 1.2 % — % (12.5 )% (11.3 )%

~~Following are the key effects of acquisitions and divestiture (aside from the reconsolidation of GST and OldCo) on sales for the first nine months of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016:~~

~~Acquisition of Qualiseal in the second quarter of 2017 in the Sealing Products segment;~~

~~Acquisition of Rubber Fab in the second quarter of 2016 included in the Sealing Products segment;~~

~~Divestiture of our Franken Plastik business unit previously included in the Sealing Products segment at the end of 2016; and~~

~~Divestiture of our CPI Thailand business unit previously included in the Engineered Products segment in the second quarter of 2016.~~

~~See below for additional discussion on segment sales and segment profits.~~

Corporate expenses for the first nine months of 2017 increased $2.4 million as compared to the same period in 2016. The increase was driven primarily by increased incentive compensation costs during the current year associated with higher projected attainment under our long-term incentive program ($2.7 million) and higher projected attainment under the 2017 annual incentive plan as compared to the 2016 annual incentive plan ($1.4 million) offset in part by lower compensation expense associated with 2016 headcount reductions ($1.0 million), the year-over-year impact of restructuring costs incurred in the prior year associated with those reductions ($0.7 million), and other administrative cost reductions.

~~Interest expense, net in the first nine months of 2017 increased by $0.2 million as compared to the same period of 2016, primarily due to higher average outstanding indebtedness.~~

Other expense, net in the first nine months of 2017 increased by $8.8 million as compared to the same period of 2016, due mainly to the above-mentioned long-lived asset impairment charge of $10.1 million associated with the ATD business in our Sealing Products segment offset partially by a decrease in costs associated with previously divested businesses, including legal and environmental remediation costs.

During the first nine months of 2016, our effective tax rate was 42.3% as we recorded an income tax benefit of $27.2 million on pre-tax loss of $64.4 million. The volatility during this nine-month period is a result of our geographical mix of pre-tax losses in the U.S., a higher tax jurisdiction, and pre-tax profits in lower tax jurisdictions.

~~Net income was $505.6 million, or $23.32 per share, in the first nine months of 2017 compared to net loss of $37.2 million, or $1.71 per share, in the same period of 2016.~~

~~Following is a discussion of operating results for each segment during the first nine months of 2017:~~

~~Sealing Products~~. Sales of $584.3 million in the first nine months of 2017 reflect a 9.7% increase compared to the $532.6 million reported in the same period of 2016. Sales to third parties from the reconsolidated GST businesses were $33.4 million. Excluding these sales, the benefit of acquisitions net of the divestiture of Franken Plastik ($4.5 million) and unfavorable foreign exchange translation ($1.7 million), sales were up 2.9% or $15.4 million due to volume increases associated with strength in the semiconductor, food and pharmaceutical, and aerospace markets along with improvement in the oil and gas market. This strength was offset partially by softness in heavy-duty trucking, industrial gas turbines, and nuclear demand.

Segment profit of $65.0 million in the first nine months of 2017 increased 4.2% from $62.4 million reported in the same period of 2016. Operating margins for the segment decreased from 11.7% in the first nine months of 2016 to 11.1% in

the first nine months of 2017. Segment profit from the reconsolidated GST businesses was $2.9 million. Excluding this impact, the unfavorable year-over-year impact of acquisitions and acquisition-related costs net of the Franken Plastik divestiture ($0.6 million), a year over year decrease in restructuring costs ($0.5 million), and unfavorable foreign exchange translation ($0.3 million), segment profit was relatively flat to prior year, as the impact of the increased sales was offset by unfavorable mix mainly driven by the higher semiconductor and lower industrial gas turbines and nuclear sales compared to prior year.

~~Engineered Products~~. Sales in the first nine months of 2017 increased 6.0% to $226.3 million from $213.5 million reported in the same period of 2016. Sales to third parties from the reconsolidated GST businesses were $0.2 million. Excluding these sales, the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange translation ($1.3 million) and of the divestiture of our CPI Thailand operations ($0.3 million unfavorable), sales were up 6.7% or $14.4 million primarily due to strength in the North American and European automotive market, North American oil and gas market, general industrial market, and general demand in Asia.

Segment profit in the first nine months of 2017 was $25.4 million compared to $10.4 million in the same period of 2016, an increase of $15.0 million, or 144.2%. Operating margins for the segment were 11.2%, which was up from the 4.9% reported in the first nine months of 2016. Segment profit from the reconsolidated GST businesses was $0.1 million. Excluding this impact, decreased restructuring costs ($3.8 million) due to the costs incurred in 2016 for locations exited and unfavorable current year foreign exchange translation ($0.3 million), segment profit increased $11.3 million, or 73.3%. The increase was due primarily to the higher sales volume (approximately $10 million) and lower salaries and benefits primarily from the cost-reduction efforts in 2016 ($3.2 million), partially offset by increased incentive compensation accruals related to higher projected attainment under 2017 annual incentive plans ($1.0 million)

~~Power Systems~~. Sales of $139.4 million in the first nine months of 2017 decreased $17.8 million, or 11.3%, from $157.2 million in the same period of 2016. The decrease was net of sales to third parties from the reconsolidated GST businesses of $1.8 million. The decrease was driven mainly by lower aftermarket parts revenues ($11.7 million) and engine revenues ($9.6 million) partially offset by an increase in services revenue ($3.4 million). Year-over-year comparisons for aftermarket parts were challenging due to record parts sales in the second quarter of 2016. This overall decrease was net of approximately $4 million of favorability due to parts and services price increases in the current year.

The segment reported a profit of $20.6 million in the first nine months of 2017 compared to $15.5 million in the first nine months of 2016, an increase of 32.9%. Operating margins for the segment were 14.8% in the first nine months of 2017. Segment profit from the reconsolidated GST businesses was $0.5 million. Excluding this impact, the year-over-year increase in segment profit is due to decreased manufacturing and administrative costs costs partially attributable to prior year cost-savings initiatives (approximately $4.0 million), the aforementioned parts and services price increases (approximately $4 million), lower warranty costs ($2.1 million), and to the impact to 2016 associated with the AVL legal matter ($3.0 million, inclusive of the $2.7 million settlement). Lower current year inventory costs also resulted in income from the revaluation of the segment's inventory to LIFO the first nine months of 2017 ($2.2 million). Additionally, in the nine months ended September 30, 2017, a $2.8 million reduction in the loss reserve on the EDF contract was recognized compared to a $1.8 million increase to the total contract loss in the corresponding prior year period. These positive impacts were offset mainly by the aforementioned overall sales decline ($5.8 million), and further impacted by lower margins on engine sales in 2017 than in the corresponding prior year period. The reduction of total EDF contract loss for the first nine months of 2017 included a positive foreign exchange effect of $7.6 million due to the weakening of the U.S. Dollar versus the Euro, partially offset by $4.8 million in increased estimated costs to complete the contract. The assessment for the first nine months of 2016 included a positive foreign exchange effect of $1.4 million offset by $3.2 million in increased estimated costs to complete the contract.

~~Liquidity and Capital Resources~~

~~As of~~ ~~September 30, 2017~~, we held all of our $176.1 million of cash and cash equivalents outside of the United States. If the funds held outside the United States were needed for our operations in the U.S., we have several methods to repatriate without significant tax effects, including repayment of intercompany loans or distributions of previously taxed income. Other distributions may require us to incur U.S. or foreign taxes to repatriate these funds. However, our intent is to permanently reinvest these funds outside the U.S. and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate cash to fund our U.S. operations.

In February 2017, we received a private letter ruling from the Internal Revenue Service, in satisfaction of a condition of the Joint Plan, that the trust established under the Joint Plan (the "Trust") will be recognized as a “qualified settlement fund” under section 468B of the Internal Revenue Code, and any related regulations, and that amounts contributed to the Trust as contemplated by the Joint Plan would be deductible for federal income tax purposes in the year in which the contribution is made. Based on this ruling and section 162(a), we will deduct the Trust contributions totaling $400 million and the settlement payment of $16.7 million paid to the Canadian Provinces, net of related insurance reimbursements on our current federal tax return. Please refer to the "-Contingencies - Subsidiary Asbestos Bankruptcies" section of this analysis for further information on these contributions.

While we are currently finalizing our analysis, this deduction represents a substantial tax benefit. A portion of the benefit will offset current taxable income and the balance, representing an NOL, will be carried back and offset against taxable income in the preceding 10 years. This benefit will be realized through the filing of refund claims in conjunction with our 2017 federal tax return anticipated to be filed by end of the first quarter of 2018. The refunds are expected to be received within 90 days of filing, subject to potential delay in the event of an IRS audit review.

~~Cash Flows~~

Operating activities provided $64.4 million of cash in the first nine months of 2017 compared to $7.9 million in the same period last year. The improvement was due mainly to the contributions from higher segment profit as discussed in the previous section, lower payments for income taxes ($17.9 million) as a result of no estimated federal tax payments having been made in 2017 due to a projected federal tax loss arising from deductions related to payments under the Joint Plan and settlement of Canadian provincial claims as described above~~, net asbestos insurance receipts ($9.9 million) in 2017, and lower pension contributions ($6.0 million) than in the prior year~~.

Investing activities used $74.2 million and $52.5 million of cash during the first nine months of 2017 and 2016, respectively. The increase was mainly due to a capital contribution ($45.2 million) made to OldCo during the time in which it was deconsolidated from EnPro in order to fund OldCo's initial $50 million payment in July 2017 to the Trust along with the expenditures for the acquisition of Qualiseal in the first nine months of 2017 ($39.5 million) compared to the acquisition of Rubber Fab in the comparable prior year period ($28.5 million). These factors were offset partially by a net cash increase of $36.3 million associated with the deconsolidation of OldCo in the first quarter of 2017 and the reconsolidation of GST and OldCo in the third quarter of 2017.

~~Financing activities provided $65.4 million in cash in the first~~ ~~nine~~ ~~months of~~ ~~2017~~, primarily from $149.2 million in net proceeds from the offering of the Additional Notes, offset by a payment on the GST notes during the time in which GST was deconsolidated from EnPro ($45.2 million) that contributed to GST's initial funding of the above-mentioned trust, net repayments on our revolving credit facility ($14.1 million), and by cash paid to repurchase shares ($11.5 million) and for dividends ($14.3 million). Financing activities in the first ~~nine~~ months of 2016 provided cash of $67.7 million, primarily from $105.7 million in net borrowings from our revolving credit facility, offset partially by cash paid to repurchase shares ($26.2 million) and for dividends ($13.6 million).

~~Capital Resources~~

~~Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility~~. On August 28, 2014, we amended and restated the agreement governing our senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility Amendment”). The Revolving Credit Facility expires in August 2019.

The Credit Facility Amendment provides for a five-year, $300 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). At September 30, 2017, borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility bore interest at an annual rate of LIBOR plus 2.00% or base rate plus 1.00%, although the interest rates under the Revolving Credit Facility are subject to incremental increases and decreases based on a consolidated total leverage ratio. In addition, a commitment fee accrues with respect to the unused amount of the Revolving Credit Facility at an annual rate of 0.25%, which rate is also subject to incremental increases and decreases based on a consolidated total leverage ratio.

~~The Credit Facility Amendment contains certain financial covenants and required financial ratios, including:~~

a maximum consolidated total net leverage ratio of not more than 4.0 to 1.0 (with total debt, for the purposes of such ratio, to exclude the intercompany notes payable to GST LLC and to be net of up to $75 million of unrestricted cash of EnPro Industries, Inc. and its domestic, consolidated subsidiaries); and

~~a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of at least 2.5 to 1.0.~~

The Credit Facility Amendment contains affirmative and negative covenants (subject, in each case, to customary exceptions and qualifications), including covenants that limit our ability to, among other things:

~~grant liens on our assets;~~

~~incur additional indebtedness (including guarantees and other contingent obligations);~~

~~make certain investments (including loans and advances);~~

~~merge or make other fundamental changes;~~

~~sell or otherwise dispose of property or assets;~~

~~pay dividends and other distributions and prepay certain indebtedness;~~

~~make changes in the nature of our business;~~

~~enter into transactions with our affiliates;~~

~~enter into burdensome contracts;~~

~~make certain capital expenditures; and~~

~~modify or terminate documents related to certain indebtedness.~~

~~We were in compliance with all covenants of the Credit Facility Amendment as of September 30, 2017.~~

The borrowing availability at September 30, 2017, under the Revolving Credit Facility was $169.7 million, representing the full $300 million amount of the Revolving Credit Facility less $14.5 million reserved for outstanding letters of credit and $115.8 million of outstanding borrowings.

~~In October 2016, the Revolving Credit Facility was amended to permit various transactions as part of the contemplated corporate restructuring of Coltec, which is discussed further in~~ ~~" — Contingencies — Subsidiary Asbestos Bankruptcies."~~ Permitted borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility now include our subsidiary, EnPro Holdings, Inc., in addition to EnPro. Each of our domestic consolidated subsidiaries are required to guarantee the obligations of the borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility, and each of our existing domestic, consolidated subsidiaries has provided such a guarantee.

~~Senior Notes. In September 2014, we issued $300 million aggregate principal amount of our senior notes. A portion of the net proceeds of the offering of the senior notes was used to repay outstanding borrowings.~~

The senior notes are unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of EnPro and mature on September 15, 2022. Interest on the senior notes accrues at a rate of 5.875% per annum and is payable semi-annually in cash in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year, commencing March 15, 2015. The senior notes are required to be guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by each of EnPro’s existing and future direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries that is a borrower under, or guarantees, our indebtedness under the Revolving Credit Facility or guarantees any other Capital Markets Indebtedness (as defined in the indenture governing the senior notes) of EnPro or any of the guarantors.

~~On or after September 15, 2017, we may, on any one or more occasions, redeem all or a part of the senior notes at specified redemption prices plus accrued and unpaid interest.~~

Each holder of the senior notes may require us to repurchase some or all of the senior notes for cash upon the occurrence of a defined “change of control” event. Our ability to redeem the senior notes prior to maturity is subject to certain conditions, including in certain cases the payment of make-whole amounts.

The indenture governing the senior notes includes covenants that restrict our ability to engage in certain activities, including incurring additional indebtedness and paying dividends, subject in each case to specified exceptions and qualifications set forth in the indenture.

In March 2017, we completed an add-on offering of $150.0 million of our 5.875% Senior Notes due 2022 (the “Additional Notes"). We issued the Additional Notes inclusive of an original issue premium of $1.5 million. The offer was made in the United States to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and to non-U.S. persons in offshore transactions in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act.

The indenture for the Additional Notes contains the same interest payment, redemption, change of control, covenant, and guarantee provisions as for the Senior Notes. The debt premium is being amortized as a reduction to interest expense until the maturity date resulting in an effective interest rate of 5.660%.

The proceeds from the offering of the Additional Notes were used primarily to repay outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility in order to increase availability to fund future capital requirements, including those funding requirements associated with the Joint Plan, which are described in "— Contingencies — Subsidiary Asbestos Bankruptcies."

~~Related Party Notes~~. Effective as of January 1, 2010, Coltec entered into an original issue amount $73.4 million Amended and Restated Promissory Note due January 1, 2017 (the “Coltec Note”) in favor of GST LLC, and our subsidiary Stemco LP entered into an original issue amount $153.8 million Amended and Restated Promissory Note due January 1, 2017, in favor of GST LLC (the “Stemco Note”, and together with the Coltec Note, the “Notes Payable to GST”). The Notes Payable to GST amended and replaced promissory notes in the same principal amounts which were initially issued in March 2005, and which matured on January 1, 2010. In connection with the Coltec Restructuring (described in “— Contingencies — Subsidiary Asbestos Bankruptcies"), the obligations of OldCo, as the successor by merger to Coltec, under the Notes Payable to GST were assumed by EnPro Holdings, and OldCo was released from those obligations. In addition, the Coltec Note and the Stemco Note were amended to extend their maturity date to January 1, 2018.

The Notes Payable to GST bear interest at 11% per annum, of which 6.5% is payable in cash and 4.5% is added to the principal amount of the Notes Payable to GST as payment-in-kind (“PIK”) interest, with interest due on January 31 of each year. In conjunction with the interest payments in 2017 and 2016, $19.3 million and $18.4 million, respectively, was paid in cash and PIK interest of $13.4 million and $12.7 million, respectively, was added to the principal balance of the Notes Payable to GST. If GST LLC is unable to pay ordinary course operating expenses, under certain conditions, they can require EnPro Holdings and Stemco to pay in cash the accrued PIK interest necessary to meet such ordinary course operating expenses, subject to certain caps. The interest due under the Notes Payable to GST may be satisfied through offsets of amounts due under intercompany services agreements pursuant to which we provide certain corporate services, make available access to group insurance coverage to GST, make advances to third party providers related to payroll and certain benefit plans sponsored by GST, and permit employees of GST to participate in certain of our benefit plans.

The Coltec Note is secured by EnPro Holdings' pledge of certain of its equity ownership in specified U.S. subsidiaries. The Stemco Note is guaranteed by EnPro Holdings and secured by EnPro Holdings' pledge of its interest in Stemco. The Notes Payable to GST are subordinated to any obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility under existing subordination agreements which subordinate GST LLC's right to receive payment of principal on the Notes Payable to GST to the prior payment in full of all obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility. With the reconsolidation of GST in the third quarter, these borrowings are now intercompany and are therefore not reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2017.

~~Share Repurchase Program~~. In October 2015, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of our outstanding common shares. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, we repurchased 0.2 million shares for $11.5 million. Through September 30, 2017, we have purchased $47.2 million of the $50.0 million authorized, including purchases in 2015 and 2016. The remaining amount of authorized purchases in the program at September 30, 2017 was $2.8 million. The program authorization expired in October 2017, with no further purchases made after September 30, 2017.

Also in October 2017, our board of directors authorized a new program for the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of our outstanding common shares. This program authorization will expire in October 2020.

~~Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC and Garrison Litigation Management Group, Ltd.~~

The historical business operations of GST LLC and Anchor resulted in a substantial volume of asbestos litigation in which plaintiffs alleged personal injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos fibers. Those subsidiaries manufactured and/or sold industrial sealing products, predominately gaskets and packing, containing encapsulated asbestos fibers. Anchor is an inactive and insolvent indirect subsidiary of Coltec. Our subsidiaries’ exposure to asbestos litigation and their relationships with insurance carriers have been managed through another Coltec subsidiary, Garrison.

On the GST Petition Date, GST LLC, Anchor and Garrison filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in Bankruptcy Court. The filings were the initial step in a claims resolution process for an efficient and permanent resolution of all pending and future asbestos claims through court approval of a plan of reorganization to establish a facility to resolve and pay all GST asbestos claims. On March 17, 2016, we announced that we had reached a comprehensive consensual settlement to resolve current and future asbestos claims.

Prior to its deconsolidation effective on the GST Petition Date, GST LLC and its subsidiaries operated as part of the Garlock group of companies within EnPro’s Sealing Products segment. GST LLC designs, manufactures and sells sealing products, including metallic, non-metallic and composite material gaskets, rotary seals, compression packing, resilient metal seals, elastomeric seals, hydraulic components, and expansion joints. GST LLC and its subsidiaries operate five primary manufacturing facilities, including GST LLC’s operations in Palmyra, New York and Houston, Texas.

Garrison’s principal business historically has been to manage the defense of all asbestos-related litigation affecting our subsidiaries, principally GST LLC and Anchor, arising from their sale or use of products or materials containing asbestos, and to manage, bill and collect available insurance proceeds. When it commenced business in 1996, Garrison acquired certain

assets of GST LLC and assumed certain liabilities stemming from asbestos-related claims against GST LLC. Garrison is not itself a defendant in asbestos-related litigation and has no direct liability for asbestos-related claims. Rather, it has assumed GST LLC’s liability for such claims and agreed to indemnify GST LLC from liability with respect to such claims. Anchor was a distributor of products containing asbestos and was acquired by GST LLC in 1987. Anchor has been inactive and insolvent since 1993. As contemplated by the Joint Plan, on OldCo Petition Date, OldCo, as the successor by merger to Coltec, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition with the Bankruptcy Court. On February 3, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order for the joint administration of the OldCo Chapter 11 Case with the GST Chapter 11 Case. As required by GAAP, GST was deconsolidated beginning on the GST Petition Date and OldCo was deconsolidated beginning on the OldCo Petition Date. Both GST and OldCo were reconsolidated on the effective date of the consummation of the Joint Plan, July 31, 2017.

~~Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates~~

~~Please refer to our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, for a complete list of our critical accounting policies and estimates.~~

~~Contingencies~~

~~General~~

A detailed description of environmental, asbestos and other legal matters relating to certain of our subsidiaries is included in this section. In addition to the matters noted herein, we are from time to time subject to, and are presently involved in, other litigation and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe the outcome of such other litigation and legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Expenses for administrative and legal proceedings are recorded when incurred.

~~Environmental~~

Based on our prior ownership of Crucible Steel Corporation a/k/a Crucible, Inc. (“Crucible”), we may have additional contingent liabilities in one or more significant environmental matters. One such matter, which is included in the 15 sites referred to above, is the Lower Passaic River Study Area of the Diamond Alkali Superfund Site in New Jersey. Crucible operated a steel mill abutting the Passaic River in Harrison, New Jersey from the 1930s until 1974, which was one of many industrial operations on the river dating back to the 1800s. Certain contingent environmental liabilities related to this site were retained by Coltec when Coltec sold a majority interest in Crucible Materials Corporation (the successor of Crucible) in 1985, which liabilities and other legacy non-asbestos liabilities were assumed by our subsidiary, EnPro Holdings, as part of the corporate restructuring of Coltec described below in "— Subsidiary Asbestos Bankruptcies." The United States Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) notified Coltec in September 2003 that it is a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) for Superfund response actions in the lower 17-mile stretch of the Passaic River known as the Lower Passaic River Study Area. Coltec and approximately 70 of the numerous other PRPs, known as the Cooperating Parties Group, are parties to a May 2007 Administrative Order on Consent with the EPA to perform a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (“RI/FS”) of the contaminants in the Lower Passaic River Study Area. The RI/FS was completed and submitted to the EPA at the end of April 2015. The RI/FS recommends a targeted dredge and cap remedy with monitored natural recovery and adaptive management for the Lower Passaic River Study Area. The cost of such remedy is estimated to be $726 million. Previously, on April 11, 2014, the EPA released its Focused Feasibility Study (the “FFS”) with its proposed plan for remediating the lower eight miles of the Lower Passaic River Study Area. The FFS calls for bank-to-bank dredging and capping of the riverbed of that portion of the river and estimates a range of the present value of aggregate remediation costs of approximately $953 million to approximately $1.73 billion, although estimates of the costs and the timing of costs are inherently imprecise. On March 3, 2016, the EPA

issued the final Record of Decision (ROD) as to the remedy for the lower eight miles of the Lower Passaic River Study Area, with the maximum estimated cost being reduced by the EPA from $1.73 billion to $1.38 billion, primarily due to a reduction in the amount of cubic yards of material that will be dredged. In October 2016, Occidental Chemical Corporation, the successor to the entity that operated the Diamond Alkali chemical manufacturing facility, reached an agreement with the EPA to develop the design for this proposed remedy at an estimated cost of $165 million. The EPA has estimated that it will take approximately four years to develop this design.

No final allocations of responsibility have been made among the numerous PRPs that have received notices from the EPA, there are numerous identified PRPs that have not yet received PRP notices from the EPA, and there are likely many PRPs that have not yet been identified. Based on our evaluation of the site, during 2014 we accrued a liability of $3.5 million related to environmental remediation costs associated with the lower eight miles of the Lower Passaic River Study Area, which is our estimate of the low end of a range of reasonably possible costs, with no estimate within the range being a better estimate than the minimum. Our actual remediation costs could be significantly greater than the $3.5 million we accrued. With respect to the upper nine miles of the Lower Passaic River Study Area, we are unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible costs.

Another such matter involves the Onondaga Lake Superfund Site (the “Onondaga Site”) located near Syracuse, New York. Crucible operated a steel mill facility adjacent to Onondaga Lake from 1911 to 1983. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (“NYSDEC”) has contacted us and Coltec, as well as other parties, demanding reimbursement of unquantified environmental response costs incurred by NYSDEC and the EPA at the Onondaga Site. NYSDEC and EPA have alleged that contamination from the Crucible facility contributed to the need for environmental response actions at the Onondaga Site. In addition, Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”), which has undertaken certain remediation activities at the Onondaga Site under the supervision of NYSDEC and the EPA, has informed us that it has claims against Coltec related to investigation and remediation at the Onondaga Site. We have entered into tolling agreements with NYSDEC, the EPA and Honeywell. On May 4, 2016, we received from Honeywell a summary of its claims. We have corresponded with Honeywell and have begun discussions with them regarding their claims. In addition, we have received notice from the Natural Resource Trustees for the Onondaga Lake Superfund Site (which are the U.S. Department of Interior, NYSDEC, and the Onondaga Nation) alleging that Coltec is considered to be a potentially responsible party for natural resource damages at the Onondaga Site. At this time, based on limited information we have with respect to estimated remediation costs and the respective allocation of responsibility for remediation among potentially responsible parties, we cannot estimate a reasonably possible range of loss associated with Crucible’s activities that may have affected the Onondaga Site. We have reserved $1.5 million for reimbursement of EPA response costs and certain costs associated with the remedial investigation.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had accrued liabilities of $24.8 million and $23.1 million, respectively, for estimated future expenditures relating to environmental contingencies. Given the uncertainties regarding the status of laws, regulations, enforcement policies, the impact of other parties potentially being fully or partially liable, technology and information related to individual sites, we do not believe it is possible to develop an estimate of the range of reasonably possible environmental loss in excess of our recorded liabilities. In addition, based on our prior ownership of Crucible, we may have additional contingent liabilities in one or more significant environmental matters, which are included in the 15 sites referred to above. Except with respect to specific Crucible environmental matters for which we have accrued a portion of the liability set forth above, we are unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss related to these contingent liabilities. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our environmental contingencies and see the section titled “Crucible Steel Corporation a/k/a Crucible, Inc.” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

In addition to the Crucible environmental matters discussed above, Coltec has received a notice from the EPA asserting that Coltec is a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act ("CERCLA") as the successor to a former operator in 1954 and 1955 of two uranium mines in Arizona. On October 15, 2015, Coltec received another notice from the EPA asserting that Coltec is a potentially responsible party as the successor to the former operator of six additional uranium mines in Arizona. In 2015, we reserved $1.1 million for the minimum amount of probable loss associated with the first two mines identified by the EPA, including the cost of the investigative work to be conducted at such sites. During the second quarter of 2016, we reserved an additional $1.1 million for the minimum amount of probable loss associated with the six additional mines, which includes additional estimated costs of investigative work to be conducted at the eight mines. At September 30, 2017, we increased the reserve by $1.9 million to a balance of $4.0 million in anticipation of entering into an agreement with the EPA to perform investigations to determine the nature and extent of contamination at each site with the investigations to be completed by the end of 2019. We cannot at this time estimate a reasonably possible range of loss associated with remediation or other incremental costs related to these mines.

In connection with the former operation of a division of Colt Industries Inc, located in Water Valley, Mississippi, which Coltec divested to BorgWarner, Inc. ("BorgWarner") in 1996, Coltec has been managing trichloroethylene soil and groundwater contamination at the site. In February 2016, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) issued an order

against EnPro requiring evaluation of potential vapor intrusion into residential properties and commercial facilities located over the groundwater plume as well as requiring additional groundwater investigation and remediation. MDEQ performed the initial vapor intrusion investigations at certain residential and commercial sites, with the findings all being below the applicable screening level. In April 2016, the parties entered into a new order including negotiated time frames for groundwater remediation. Pursuant to that order, MDEQ performed a second round of seasonable vapor intrusion sampling beginning in August 2016. Results from sampling outside of three residences were above screening levels. Follow-up sampling directly underneath those residences (either sub-slab or in crawl spaces) were all below applicable screening levels. Two separate sampling events at another residence were also below applicable screening levels. Due to an increasing trend in vapor concentrations, MDEQ requested that we develop and implement initial corrective action measures to address vapor intrusion resulting from groundwater contamination in this residential area. These measures have been developed and approved by MDEQ. Implementation of the approved measures will begin when access is obtained to private properties where the corrective action system will be located. In addition, vapor intrusion sampling at the manufacturing facility owned by BorgWarner was conducted during the first quarter of 2017. The results showed exceedances of screening levels at various areas in the plant and exceedances of levels requiring responsive actions in a limited area of the plant. Implementation of the immediate responsive actions has been completed and corrective action consisting of a permanent vapor intrusion remediation system became operational in May 2017. We are also continuing soil and groundwater investigation work around the outside of the plant and developing corrective action plans for both the contamination remaining at the plant as well as contamination that has migrated off-site. All of the work to be performed at the residential area, the plant and off-site is set forth in an agreed Order that we and MDEQ entered into on September 11, 2017. During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, we established an additional $1.3 million reserve with respect to this matter. During the quarter ended March 31, 2017 we reserved an additional $3.3 million for further investigation, additional remediation, long-term monitoring costs, and legal fees to support regulatory compliance for the above noted actions. The remaining reserve at September 30, 2017 is $1.8 million. As the corrective actions are implemented and their performance monitored, further modifications to the remediation system at the site may be required which may result in additional costs beyond the current reserve.

On April 7, 2017, the State of Mississippi through its Attorney General filed suit against EnPro, OldCo and Goodrich Corporation in Mississippi Circuit Court in Yalobusha County seeking recovery of all costs and expenses to be incurred by the State in remediating the groundwater contamination, punitive damages and attorney’s fees. We plan to aggressively defend this case. The additional reserve established in the quarter ended March 31 2017, noted above, does not include any estimate of contingent loss associated with this lawsuit other than due to remediation and other actions with respect to this site based on existing MDEQ orders and the expected order with MDEQ described above. In addition, it is our understanding that area homeowners, owners of commercial facilities and the local county government and possibly other private parties and individuals have engaged or may engage legal counsel to separately evaluate possible legal action relating to potential vapor intrusion and groundwater contamination. We have been further advised that certain of these parties intend to file legal action based on these claims. Based upon limited information regarding any further remediation or other actions that may be required at the site, we cannot estimate a minimum loss estimate or a reasonably possible range of loss for remediation costs.

~~Colt Firearms and Central Moloney~~

We may have contingent liabilities related to divested businesses for which certain of our subsidiaries retained liability or are obligated under indemnity agreements. These contingent liabilities include, but are not limited to, potential product liability and associated claims related to firearms manufactured prior to March 1990 by Colt Firearms, a former operation of Coltec, and for electrical transformers manufactured prior to May 1994 by Central Moloney, another former Coltec operation. We believe that these potential contingent liabilities are not material to our financial condition, results of operation and cash flows. Ongoing obligations with regard to workers’ compensation, retiree medical and other retiree benefit matters that relate to Coltec’s periods of ownership of these operations are included in other liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

~~Crucible Steel Corporation a/k/a Crucible, Inc.~~

Crucible, which was engaged primarily in the manufacture and distribution of high technology specialty metal products, was a wholly owned subsidiary of Coltec until 1983 when its assets and liabilities were distributed to a new Coltec subsidiary, Crucible Materials Corporation. Coltec sold a majority of the outstanding shares of Crucible Materials Corporation in 1985 and divested its remaining minority interest in 2004. Crucible Materials Corporation filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in May 2009 and is no longer conducting operations. We have certain ongoing obligations, which are included in other liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, including workers’ compensation, retiree medical and other retiree benefit matters, related to Coltec’s period of ownership of Crucible. Based on Coltec’s prior ownership of Crucible, we may have certain other contingent liabilities, including liabilities in one or more significant environmental matters included in the matters discussed in “Environmental” above. We are investigating these matters. Except with respect to those matters for which we have an accrued liability as discussed in “Environmental” above, we are unable to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss

~~related to these contingent liabilities. See Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information about certain liabilities relating to Coltec’s ownership of Crucible.~~

~~BorgWarner~~

A subsidiary of BorgWarner has asserted claims against our subsidiary, GGB France E.U.R.L. (“GGB France”), regarding certain bearings supplied by GGB France to BorgWarner and used by BorgWarner in manufacturing hydraulic control units included in motor vehicle automatic transmission units, mainly that the bearings caused performance problems with and/or damage to the transmission units, leading to associated repairs and replacements. BorgWarner and GGB France participated in a technical review before a panel of experts to determine, among other things, whether there were any defects in such bearings that were a cause of the damages claimed by BorgWarner, including whether GGB France was required to notify BorgWarner of a change in the source of a raw material used in the manufacture of such bearings. This technical review was a required predicate to the commencement of a legal proceeding for damages. In June 2016, the expert panel issued a preliminary report on technical matters considered by the experts. This preliminary report concluded that the change in the source of the raw material was the technical cause of the performance problems claimed by BorgWarner and that GGB France was obligated to notify BorgWarner regarding the change. Separately, in November 2016, the expert panel issued a preliminary report on related financial matters. The expert panel issued a final report on technical and financial matters on April 6, 2017. In the final report, the expert panel concluded that GGB France had a duty to notify BorgWarner regarding the change of source of raw material used in the bearings, but that the failure of the hydraulic control units was attributable to both the raw material supplier change and the insufficient design of the units by BorgWarner. The expert panel provided detail on a possible allocation of damages alleged to have been incurred by BorgWarner and its customer. Although the language of the report is not clear, the report appears to note a potential allocation of recoverable damages 35% to BorgWarner and 65% to GGB France. It also indicates that, though it is for a court to ultimately determine, the aggregate damages to BorgWarner and its customer was in the range of 7.9 million EUR to 10.2 million EUR, with 1.8 million EUR to 2.1 million EUR of this range being for damages to BorgWarner and the remainder being for damages to its customer. The experts noted the lower end of the range as being more likely and noted a lack of sufficient evidence provided substantiating the customer's damages. Applying a 65% liability allocation to GGB to the total aggregate range yields a range of 5.1 million EUR to 6.6 million EUR. In the final report, the expert panel deferred to a court the determination of whether GGB France had breached its contractual obligations to BorgWarner. On October 25, 2017, BorgWarner initiated a legal proceeding against GGB with respect to this matter by filing a writ of claim with the Commercial Court of Brive, France.

~~Subsidiary Asbestos Bankruptcies~~

The historical business operations of GST LLC and Anchor resulted in a substantial volume of asbestos litigation in which plaintiffs alleged personal injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos fibers in products produced or sold by GST LLC or Anchor, together with products produced and sold by numerous other companies. GST LLC and Anchor manufactured and/or sold industrial sealing products that contained encapsulated asbestos fibers. Other of our subsidiaries that manufactured or sold equipment that may have at various times in the past contained asbestos-containing components have also been named in a number of asbestos lawsuits, but neither we nor any of our subsidiaries other than GST LLC and Anchor had ever paid an asbestos claim.

On the GST Petition Date, GST LLC, Garrison and Anchor filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. The filings were the initial step in a claims resolution process. As contemplated by the Joint Plan, on the OldCo Petition Date, OldCo, as the successor by merger to Coltec, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition with the Bankruptcy Court.

As a result of the initiation of the GST Chapter 11 Case and the OldCo Chapter 11 Case, the resolution of asbestos claims against these companies was subject to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court. The filing of the GST Chapter 11 Case automatically stayed the prosecution of pending asbestos bodily injury and wrongful death lawsuits, and initiation of new such

lawsuits, against GST. Further, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order enjoining plaintiffs from bringing or further prosecuting asbestos products liability actions against affiliates of GST, including EnPro, Coltec and all their subsidiaries, during the pendency of the GST Chapter 11 Case, subject to further order. As a result, except as a result of the resolution of appeals from verdicts rendered prior to the GST Petition Date and the elimination of claims as a result of information obtained in the GST Chapter 11 Case, the numbers of asbestos claims pending against our subsidiaries had not changed since the GST Petition Date.

On March 17, 2016, EnPro announced that it had reached a comprehensive settlement (the “Consensual Settlement”) to resolve current and future asbestos claims. The settlement was reached with the court-appointed committee representing current asbestos claimants (the “GST Committee”) and the court-appointed legal representative of future asbestos claimants (the “GST FCR”) in the GST Chapter 11 Case. Representatives for current and future asbestos claimants (the “Coltec Representatives”) against Coltec also joined in the settlement. Under the settlement, the GST Committee, the GST FCR and the Coltec Representatives agreed to join GST and Coltec in proposing the Joint Plan and to ask asbestos claimants and the court to approve the Joint Plan. The Joint Plan was filed with the Bankruptcy Court on May 20, 2016 and amendments to the Joint Plan were filed with the Bankruptcy Court on June 21, 2016, July 29, 2016, December 2, 2016, April 3, 2017, May 14, 2017, May 19, 2017, June 8, 2017, and June 9, 2017. As so modified, the Joint Plan superseded all prior plans of reorganization filed by GST with the Bankruptcy Court. The Joint Plan was consummated and became effective at 12:01 a.m. on July 31, 2017 (the “Joint Plan Effective Date”).

The Joint Plan and Consensual Settlement contemplated that, as an appropriate and necessary step to facilitate the implementation of the Consensual Settlement and not to delay or hinder creditors or the resolution of claims, Coltec would, subject to the receipt of necessary consents, undergo the Coltec Restructuring in which all of its significant operating assets and subsidiaries, which included each of our major business units, would be distributed to a new direct EnPro subsidiary, EnPro Holdings, Inc. ("EnPro Holdings"). EnPro Holdings would also assume all of Coltec’s non-asbestos liabilities. The Coltec Restructuring was completed on December 31, 2016, and included the merger of Coltec with and into OldCo, which was a direct subsidiary of EnPro Holdings. OldCo, as the restructured entity, retained responsibility for all asbestos claims and rights to certain insurance assets of Coltec, as well as the business operated by our EnPro Learning System, LLC subsidiary (“EnPro Learning System”), which provides occupational safety training and consulting services to third parties. EnPro Learning System was also merged into OldCo.

Pursuant to the Joint Plan, the Trust was established prior to the Joint Plan Effective Date. As contemplated by the Joint Plan, the Trust was funded (i) with aggregate cash contributions by GST LLC and Garrison of $350 million made immediately prior to the Joint Plan Effective Date, (ii) by the contribution made by OldCo immediately prior to the Joint Plan Effective Date of $50 million in cash and an option, exercisable one year after the Joint Plan Effective Date, permitting the Trust to purchase for $1 shares of EnPro common stock having a value of $20 million (with OldCo having the right to call the option for payment of $20 million in cash at any time prior to the first anniversary of the Joint Plan Effective Date, with the Trust having the right to put the option to OldCo for payment by OldCo of $20 million on the day prior to the first anniversary of the Joint Plan Effective Date and with the option terminating on the second anniversary of the Joint Plan Effective Date in return for payment to the Trust of $20 million), and (iii) by the obligations under the Joint Plan of OldCo to make a deferred contribution of $40 million in cash and of GST LLC and Garrison to make an aggregate deferred contribution of $20 million in cash no later than one year after the Joint Plan Effective Date. These deferred contributions are guaranteed by EnPro and secured by a pledge of 50.1% of the outstanding voting equity interests of GST LLC and Garrison.

The Consensual Settlement included as a condition to our obligations to proceed with the settlement that EnPro, Coltec, GST and Garlock of Canada Ltd (an indirect subsidiary of GST LLC) enter into a written agreement, to be consummated concurrently with the consummation of the Joint Plan on the Joint Plan Effective Date, with the Canadian provincial workers’ compensation boards (the “Provincial Boards”) resolving remedies the Provincial Boards may possess against Garlock of Canada Ltd, GST, Coltec or any of their affiliates, including releases and covenants not to sue, for any present or future asbestos-related claim, and that the agreement is either approved by the Bankruptcy Court following notice to interested parties or the Bankruptcy Court concludes that its approval is not required. On November 11, 2016, we entered into such an agreement (the “Canadian Settlement”) with the Provincial Boards to resolve current and future claims against EnPro, GST, Garrison, Coltec, and Garlock of Canada Ltd for recovery of a portion of amounts the Provincial Boards have paid and will pay in the future under asbestos-injury recovery statutes in Canada for claims relating to asbestos-containing products. The Canadian Settlement provides for an aggregate cash settlement payment to the Provincial Boards of $20 million (U.S.), payable on the fourth anniversary of the effective date of the Joint Plan. Under the Canadian Settlement, after the effective date of the Joint Plan, the Provincial Boards had the option of accelerating the payment, in which case the amount payable would be discounted from the fourth anniversary of the effective date of the Joint Plan to the payment date at a discount rate of 4.5% per annum. In return, the Provincial Boards have separately agreed to provide a covenant not to sue EnPro, any of EnPro’s affiliates or the Trust for any present or future asbestos-related claims. On February 3, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court issued an order approving the Canadian Settlement. Prior to the Joint Plan Effective Date, the Provincial Boards provided notice of their election to accelerate the payment. After application of the discount resulting from such acceleration of payment, the settlement payment of approximately $16.7 million (U.S.) was made to the Provincial Boards on August 11, 2017.

Under the Consensual Settlement and Joint Plan, GST and OldCo retained their rights to seek reimbursement under insurance policies for any amounts they have paid in the past to resolve asbestos claims and for $480 million in aggregate contributions they will make to the Trust under the Joint Plan. These policies include a number of primary and excess general liability insurance policies that were purchased by Coltec and were in effect prior to January 1, 1976 (the “Pre-Garlock Coverage Block”). The policies provide coverage for “occurrences” happening during the policy periods and cover losses associated with product liability claims against Coltec and certain of its subsidiaries. Asbestos claims against GST are not covered under these policies because GST was not a Coltec subsidiary prior to 1976. The Joint Plan provides that OldCo may retain the first $25 million of any settlements and judgments related to insurance policies in the Pre-Garlock Coverage Block and OldCo and the Trust will share equally in any settlements and judgments OldCo may collect in excess of $25 million. As of September 30, 2017, approximately $44.4 million of available products hazard limits or insurance receivables arising from settlements with insurance carriers existed under primary and excess general liability insurance policies other than the Pre-Garlock Coverage Block (the "Garlock Coverage Block") from solvent carriers with investment grade ratings.

In addition, the District Court approved settlements with two insurance carriers in the Pre-Garlock Coverage Block that permit the recovery of some of OldCo’s $110 million of contributions to the Trust under the Joint Plan. Under the settlements, the two carriers were obligated to make one-time cash payments to OldCo in the aggregate amount of approximately $19.0 million within 30 days of consummation of the Joint Plan, which payments were made in August 2017. In addition, the District Court approved a settlement with the successors to Coltec’s Fairbanks Morse Pump business in which the Fairbanks Morse Pump successors agreed to pay OldCo $6 million in three installments over nine years following consummation of the Joint Plan, with the successor entities being entitled to recoup up to the full amount of their payments to OldCo from collections expected to be received from an additional insurance carrier that issued general liability policies to Coltec prior to January 1, 1976. OldCo and the Trust will share equally in any collections above that $6 million amount. OldCo estimates that the carrier will owe approximately $11 million in reimbursements over the life of the Trust for its share of Coltec claims (which includes Fairbanks Morse Pump claims). In August 2017, the Fairbanks Morse Pump successors and EnPro Holdings, as the successor to OldCo, agreed to permit accelerated settlements of the installments upon the lump sum payment

of $3 million made to EnPro Holdings in August 2017, with the Fairbanks Morse Pump successors surrendering any right to recoup the amount of such payment from the additional insurance carrier that issued general liability policies to Coltec prior to January 1, 1976.

At September 30, 2017, we had $44.4 million of insurance coverage we believe is available to cover GST asbestos claims payments and certain expense payments, including contributions to the Trust. GST has collected insurance payments totaling $152.3 million since the GST Petition Date. We consider the $44.4 million of available insurance coverage remaining to be of high quality because the insurance policies are written or guaranteed by U.S.-based carriers whose credit rating by S&P is investment grade (BBB-) or better, and whose AM Best rating is excellent (A-) or better. Of the $44.4 million, $8.3 million is allocated to claims that were paid by GST LLC prior to the initiation of the Chapter 11 Case and submitted to insurance companies for reimbursement, and the remainder is allocated to pending and estimated future claims. There are specific agreements in place with carriers covering $29.4 million of the remaining available coverage. Based on those agreements and the terms of the policies in place and prior decisions concerning coverage, we believe that all of the $44.4$6.7 million of insurance proceeds will ultimately be collected, although there can be no assurance that the insurance companies will make the payments as and when due. Based on those agreements and policies, some of which define specific annual amounts to be paid and others of which limit the amount that can be recovered in any one year, we anticipate that $19.2 million will be received either through settlements or in reimbursements of GST's plan funding as payments are made by the asbestos trust. Assuming the insurers pay according to the agreements and policies, we anticipate that ~~the following amounts should~~$4.2 million will be collected in the ~~years set out below:~~

~~2018 – $16.8 million~~

fourth quarter of 2019 ~~– $5.9 million~~

~~2020 –~~and $2.5 million will be collected in 2020.

We ~~are a party to legal proceedings initiated in August 2017 in the District Court with two insurers~~also believe that ~~collectively provide $15~~EnPro Holdings will bill, and could collect over time, as much as $10 million of insurance coverage in the Garlock Coverage Block. The legal proceedings were initiated by one of the insurers seeking to compel arbitration of issues under its policy and, alternatively, a determination that its policy does not cover asbestos claims. We have counterclaimed, seeking a determination that the policy coversfor non-GST asbestos claims ~~and that~~to reimburse it for Trust payments to non-GST Trust claimants. After EnPro Holdings collects the insurer breached the terms of its policy by failing to provide coverage for these claims. We joined the second insurer in this action and are seeking similar relief against it. The magistrate judge recently issued a decision denying the petitioning insurer's motion to compel arbitration, and holding that the arbitration clause in the policy was deleted by an endorsement. We expect the insurer to seek reviewfirst approximately $3 million of that ~~ruling by~~coverage, remaining collections for non-GST asbestos claims from the ~~district court judge.~~Pre-Garlock Coverage Block will be shared equally with the Trust.

GST ~~LLC~~ has received $8.8 million of insurance recoveries from insolvent carriers since 2007, and may receive additional payments from insolvent carriers in the future. No anticipated insolvent carrier collections are included in the ~~$44.4~~$6.7 million of anticipated collections. The insurance available to cover current and future asbestos claims is from comprehensive general liability policies that cover ~~OldCo, as the successor to Coltec,~~EnPro Holdings and certain of its other subsidiaries in addition to GST ~~LLC~~ for periods prior to 1985 and therefore could be subject to potential competing claims of other covered subsidiaries and their assignees.


Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing business operations, including risks from changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates that could impact our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. We manage our exposure to these and other market risks through regular operating and financing activities and through the use of derivative financial instruments. We intend to use derivative financial instruments as risk management tools and not for speculative investment purposes. For information about our interest rate risk, see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk – Interest Rate Risk” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016, and the following section.~~2018.

Foreign Currency Risk

We are exposed to foreign currency risks that arise from normal business operations. These risks include the translation of local currency balances of our foreign subsidiaries, intercompany loans with foreign subsidiaries and transactions denominated in foreign currencies. Our objective is to control our exposure to these risks and limit the volatility in our reported earnings due to foreign currency fluctuations through our normal operating activities and, where appropriate, through foreign currency forward contracts and option contracts. The notional amount of foreign exchange contracts hedging foreign currency transactions was ~~$6.9~~$2.6 million and ~~$2.8~~$7.7 million at September 30, ~~2017~~2019 and December 31, ~~2016~~2018, respectively.

In September 2018, we entered into cross-currency swap agreements with a notional amount of $200.0 million to manage foreign currency risk by effectively converting a portion of the interest payments related to our fixed-rate U.S. Dollar (“USD”)-denominated Senior Notes, including the semi-annual interest payments thereunder, to interest payments on fixed-rate Euro-denominated debt of 172.8 million EUR with a weighted average interest rate of 2.8%, with interest payment dates of March 15 and September 15 of each year. The swap agreement matures on September 15, 2022.

In May 2019, we entered into additional cross-currency swap agreements with a notional amount of $100.0 million to manage foreign currency risk by effectively converting a portion of the interest payments related to our fixed-rate USD-denominated Senior Notes, including the semi-annual interest payments thereunder, to interest payments on fixed-rate Euro-denominated debt of 89.6 million EUR with a weighted average interest rate of 3.5% , with interest payment dates of April 15 and October 15 of each year. The swap agreement matures on October 15, 2026.

During the term of the swap agreements, we will receive semi-annual payments from the counterparties due to the difference between the interest rate on the Senior Notes and the interest rate on the Euro debt underlying the swap. There was no principal exchange at the inception of the arrangements, and there will be no exchange at maturity. At maturity (or earlier at our option), we and the counterparties will settle the swap agreements at their fair value in cash based on the aggregate notional amount and the then-applicable currency exchange rate compared to the exchange rate at the time the swap agreements were entered into.

Commodity Risk

We source a wide variety of materials and components from a network of global suppliers. While such materials are typically available from numerous suppliers, commodity raw materials such as steel, engineered plastics, copper and polymers, are subject to price fluctuations (including increases due to new or increased tariffs), which could have a negative impact on our results. We strive to pass along ~~such~~ commodity price increases to customers to avoid profit margin erosion and utilize lean

initiatives to further mitigate the impact of commodity raw material price fluctuations as we achieve improved efficiencies. We do not hedge commodity risk with any market risk sensitive instruments.


Item 4.	Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) ~~and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))~~. The purpose of our disclosure controls and procedures is to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, including this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Based on the controls evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that ~~our disclosure controls and procedures are effective~~due to reasonably ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified, and that management will be timely alerted toa material ~~information required to be included in our periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.~~

~~In addition, no change~~weakness in our internal control over financial reporting ~~has~~identified in July 2019 and not yet remediated, our disclosure controls and procedures continued to not be effective as of September 30, 2019.

A material weakness (as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act) is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement in our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

In July 2019, we identified deficiencies that constituted a material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting with respect to the design and maintenance of controls over the accounting for income taxes. Specifically, we did not design and maintain effective controls to (1) sufficiently review and validate information received from foreign subsidiaries in their quarterly tax packages, including adjustments made to the packages in consolidation, which are used in the determination of the completeness and accuracy of our consolidated provision for income taxes and (2) sufficiently review the completeness and accuracy of input data used in the calculation of a new annual federal tax which became effective in 2018 under the 2017 Jobs and Tax Act and certain recurring tax credits. These deficiencies led to certain errors related to items affecting the provision for income tax expense and related accounts reported for the year ended December 31, 2018, which had the effect of understating income tax expense for the year by approximately $5.0 million.

Remediation Plan

As part of our commitment to strengthening our internal control over financial reporting, in the quarter ended September 30, 2019, we began implementing remedial actions under the oversight of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors to address these deficiencies, including:

enhancement of the Company’s quarterly tax package to require additional tax package preparer explanations, responses, representations, and formal documentation of local review and approval;

implementation of additional tax package data validation steps;

expansion of the Company’s key control regarding the review of quarterly tax packages to provide additional specific actions to be performed by corporate tax personnel in the review process, definition of specific content to be documented as part of the tax package review process and local formal concurrence to all significant corporate adjustments;

formal confirmation that special taxes and credits are based upon input factors that are reviewed and approved; and

enhancement of the quarterly review of the Effective Tax Rate (“ETR”) for each significant country and the reasons for any significant deviations from statutory or prior year ETRs by appropriate personnel.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2019, we made significant progress in identifying enhancements to our quarterly tax provision process to remediate the deficiencies noted above. We implemented these identified enhancements to quarterly tax controls including improvements to process, approval and documentation.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Except for the remediation efforts described above under the caption “Remediation Plan,” there were no changes to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2019 that ~~has~~have materially affected, or isare reasonably likely to materially affect, ~~our~~the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.

A description of environmental and other legal matters is included in Note 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, which is incorporated herein by reference. Those matters are also discussed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. In addition to the matters noted and discussed in those sections of this report, we are from time to time subject to, and are presently involved in, other litigation and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. We believe that the outcome of such other litigation and legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.


Item 1A.	Risk ~~Factors.~~Factors

~~Increased costs for raw materials, the termination of existing supply agreements or disruptions of our supply chain could~~We have identified a material ~~adverse effect on~~weakness in our ~~business.~~

~~The prices for some of the raw materials we purchase is subject to increase from time to time. While we have been successful in passing along some or all of these higher costs,~~internal control over financial reporting and there can be no assurance wethat material weaknesses will not be able to continue doing so without losing customers. Additionally, our Power Systems segment has entered into long-term contracts to manufacture and sell engines and generator sets which do not allow for price adjustments to recover additional costs resulting from increasesidentified in the ~~costs~~future.

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of ~~materials~~1934, as amended. As disclosed in Part I, Item 4, management identified deficiencies in its internal control over financial reporting, and ~~components during~~these deficiencies constituted a material weakness in the ~~contract period,~~Company’s internal control over financial reporting. A material weakness (as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As a result of this material weakness, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 version)” and accordingly that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) were not effective. This material ~~increases~~weakness resulted in ~~relevant costs could adversely affect~~a revision to our consolidated financial statements at and for the ~~profitability of these long-term contracts~~year ended December 31, 2018, though the errors corrected in such revision were not material, and were related solely to the profits of that segment. Similarly, the loss of a key supplier or the unavailability of a key raw material could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

~~We conduct a significant amount of our sales and operating activities outside~~determination of the ~~U.S., which subjects us~~provision for income taxes. We are actively engaged in developing and implementing a remediation plan designed to ~~additional business risks, including foreign exchange risks, that may cause~~address the deficiencies in our ~~profitability to decline.~~

Because we sell our products in a number of foreign countries, we are subject to risks associated with doing business internationally. In 2016, we derived approximately 43% of our net sales from sales of our products outside of the U.S. In addition, we operate 57 primary manufacturing facilities located in 12 countries, including the U.S. Our sales and operating activities outside of the U.S. are, and will continue to be, subject to a number of risks, including:

~~unfavorable fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, including long-term contracts denominated in foreign currencies;~~

•~~adverse changes in foreign tax, legal and regulatory requirements;~~

•~~difficulty in protecting intellectual property;~~

government embargoes, trade protection measures, such as “anti-dumping” duties applicable to classes of products, and import or export licensing requirements, as well as the imposition of trade sanctions against a class of products imported from or sold and exported to, or the loss of “normal trade relations” status with, countries in which we conduct business, could significantly increase our cost of products or otherwise reduce our sales and harm our business;

~~cultural norms and expectations that may sometimes be inconsistent with our Code of Conduct and our requirements about the manner in which our employees, agents and distributors conduct business;~~

•~~differing labor regulations;~~

~~political and economic instability, including instabilities associated with European sovereign debt uncertainties and the future continuity of membership of the European Union; and~~

•~~acts of hostility, terror or war.~~

Any of these factors, individually or together, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For example, tapered roller bearings manufactured at our facilities in China that are imported into the United States before re-sale to customers are potentially subject to “anti-dumping” duties imposed by the U.S. Department of Commerce based on its periodic review and analysis of the manufacturing and selling activities of larger Chinese suppliers of these products. Such duties, if imposed, could be at levels that could materially adversely affect the commercial competitiveness of these products, which could adversely affect the business and results of operations of our Sealing Products segment.

Our operations outside the United States require us to comply with a number of United States and international regulations. For example, our operations in countries outside the United States are subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

(the “FCPA”), which prohibits United States companies or their agents and employees from providing anything of value to a foreign official for the purposes of influencing any act or decision of these individuals in their official capacity to help obtain or retain business, direct business to any person or corporate entity, or obtain any unfair advantage. Our activities in countries outside the United States create the risk of unauthorized payments or offers of payments by one of our employees or agents that could be in violation of the FCPA, even though these parties are not always subject to our control. We have internal control ~~policies and procedures and have implemented training and compliance programs with respect~~over financial reporting that led to ~~the FCPA. However,~~this material weakness. Although we cannot assure that our policies, procedures and programs always will protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees or agents. In the event that we believe or have reason to believe that our employees or agents have or may have violated applicable anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA, we may be required to investigate or have outside counsel investigate the relevant facts and circumstances. In addition, we are subject to and must comply with all applicable export controls and economic sanctions laws and embargoes imposed by the United States and other various governments. Changes in export control or trade sanctions laws may restrict our business practices, including cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries or with sanctioned entities, and may result in modifications to compliance programs and increase compliance costs, and violations of these laws or regulations may subject us to fines, penalties and other sanctions, such as loss of authorizations needed to conduct aspects of our international business or debarments from export privileges. Violations of the FCPA or export controls or sanctions laws and regulations may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions, and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could negatively affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

We intend to continue to ~~pursue international growth opportunities, which~~actively monitor and improve our internal control over financial reporting, we cannot assure you that other material weaknesses will not occur in the future. Ineffective internal control over financial reporting could ~~increase~~cause investors to lose confidence in our exposure to risks associated with international sales and operations. As we expand our international operations, we may also encounter new risks that could adversely affect our revenues and profitability. For example, as we focus on building our international sales and distribution networks in new geographic regions, we must continue to develop relationships with qualified local agents, distributors and trading companies. If we are not successful in developing these relationships, we may not be able to increase sales in these regions.

~~Failure to properly manage these risks could adversely affect our business,~~reported financial ~~condition, results of operations and cash flows.~~

The strategy of our Power Systems segment to deliver power generating systems depends on our ability to outsource various elements of the scope of this work to third parties, which may expose us to the business risks of our suppliers and subcontractors,information, which could have a ~~material adverse impact~~negative effect on ~~its business and results of operations.~~

Our Power Systems segment is implementing a strategy to offer customers power generating systems, in which it depends on third-party suppliers and subcontractors for outsourced products, components or services. The implementation of that strategy subjects us to the risk of customer dissatisfaction with the quality or performance of the products or services we sell due to supplier or subcontractor failure. In addition, business difficulties experienced by a third-party supplier or subcontractor could lead to the interruptionvalue of our ability to obtain outsourced products or services and ultimately our inability to supply products or services to these customers. Third-party supplier and subcontractor business interruptions could include, but are not limited to, work stoppages, union negotiations and other labor disputes. Current or future economic conditions could also impact the ability of suppliers and subcontractors to access credit and, thus, impair their ability to provide us quality products or services in a timely manner, or at all. These factors may affect the timing and cost of completion of such projects and could adversely affect the business and results of operations of our Power Systems segment.common stock.

~~The strategy of our Power Systems segment includes development and commercialization of new power systems, including the Trident OP~~^TM engine currently in development, to support growth, which involves significant investment and involves various risks and uncertainties. These new products may not achieve desired commercial or financial results.

The future growth of our Power Systems segment will depend, in part, on its ability to successfully develop and commercialize new product offerings, including the opposed piston engine currently in development which is being marketed as the Trident OP engine. Investments in developing new products such as the Trident OP engine involve varying degrees of uncertainties and risk, including whether a new product designed to meet specific performance, cost and safety criteria can be successfully developed in a cost effective manner and our ability to internally develop, or to license or purchase from third parties, technologies critical to new product development. Commercial success of new products depends on many factors, including the levels of innovation, the development costs, the levels of competition from others developing similar or other competing products (including the duration of our exclusive use of technologies critical to our new products), our ability to obtain or maintain government permits or certifications, the effectiveness of production, distribution and marketing efforts, and the costs to customers to deploy and provide support for the new products. We may not achieve significant revenues from new product development investments for a number of years, if at all. Moreover, new products may not be profitable, and, even if they are profitable, our operating margins from new products may not be as high as the margins we anticipate or have experienced historically.

Our products are often used in critical applications, which could expose us to potentially significant product liability, warranty and other claims. Our insurance coverage may be inadequate to cover all of our significant risks or our insurers may deny coverage of material losses we incur, which could adversely affect our profitability and overall financial condition.

Our products are often used in critical applications in demanding environments, including in the nuclear, oil and gas, automotive, aerospace and pharmaceutical industries. Accordingly, product failures can have significant consequences and could result in significant product liability, warranty and other claims against us, regardless of whether our products caused the incident that is the subject of the claim. We endeavor to identify and obtain in established markets insurance agreements to cover significant risks and liabilities, though insurance against some of the risks inherent in our operations is either unavailable or available only at rates or on terms that we consider uneconomical. Depending on competitive conditions and other factors, we endeavor to obtain contractual protection against uninsured risks from our customers, including limitations on liability and indemnification. When obtained, such contractual protection may not be as broad as we desire, may not be supported by adequate insurance maintained by the customer, or may not be fully enforceable in the jurisdictions in which our customers are located. Such insurance or contractual protection may not be sufficient or effective under all circumstances or against all hazards to which we may be subject. A successful claim for which we are not insured or for which we are underinsured could have a material adverse effect on us. Additionally, disputes with insurance carriers over coverage may affect the timing of cash flows and, if litigation with the carrier becomes necessary, an outcome unfavorable to us may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.


Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The following table sets forth all purchases made by or on behalf of the Company or any “affiliated purchaser,” as defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act, of shares of our common stock during each month in the third quarter of ~~2017.~~2019.

Period
(a) Total Number
of Shares
(or Units)
Purchased

(b) Average
Price Paid per
Share (or Unit)

(c) Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs

(d) Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar Value) of
Shares (or Units) That May
Yet Be Purchased Under the
Plans or Programs

July 1 – July 31, 2017 —
—
—
$4,519,735 (1)
August 1 - August 31, 2017 17,494
(1) $69.54 (1) 17,494
(1 ) $3,303,203 (1)
September 1 – September 30, 2017 7,580
(1) (2) $70.48 (1) (2) 7,000
(1 ) $2,815,233 (1)
Total 25,074
(1) (2) $69.83 (1) (2) 24,494
(1 ) $2,815,309 (1)



Period	(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased		(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)		(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1 – July 31, 2019	—		—		—	35,000,000	(1)
August 1 – August 31, 2019	—		—		—	35,000,000	(1)
September 1 – September 30, 2019	729	(2)	$68.71	(2)	—	35,000,000	(1)
Total	729	(2)	$68.71	(2)	—	35,000,000	(1)

(1)

On October ~~28, 2015,~~31, 2018, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of our outstanding common shares, and we announced the share repurchase authorization in a press release issued on October ~~29, 2015.~~31, 2018. Pursuant to this authorization, ~~we purchased 17,494 shares~~$35,000,000 remained available at ~~an average purchase price~~the end of ~~$69.54 per share during August 2017 and 7,000 shares at an average purchase price of $69.71 per share during September 2017 (with $2,815,310 remaining authority at quarter end).~~the period.

(2)

In September ~~2017,~~2019, a total of ~~580~~729 shares were transferred to a rabbi trust that we established in connection with our Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors, pursuant to which non-employee directors may elect to defer directors’ fees into common stock units. EnPro Holdings furnished these shares in exchange for management and other services provided by EnPro. Of these shares, 8374 were valued at a price of ~~$75.60,~~$69.22, the closing trading price of our common stock on September ~~20, 2017,~~18, 2019, and ~~497~~655 of these shares were valued at a price of ~~$80.53~~$68.65 per share, the closing trading price of our common stock on September 30, ~~2017.~~2019. Accordingly, the total ~~580~~729 shares were valued at a weighted average price of ~~$79.82.~~$68.71. We do not consider the transfer of shares from EnPro Holdings in this context to be pursuant to a publicly announced plan or program.


Item 5.	Other Information.

On October 30, 2019, our Board of Directors adopted Amended and Restated Bylaws (as amended, the “Bylaws”) to replace our then-existing bylaws. The Bylaws include amendments to the then-existing provisions that require shareholders intending to nominate any candidate for election as a director at any meeting of the Company’s shareholders to provide advance notice to the Company of their intention to make such a nomination. Such amendments enhance the requirements with respect to the information to be provided by shareholders in connection with such notice to expand the information that the shareholder and specified other persons (each a “Proposing Person”) must provide to the Company at specified times in advance of the applicable meeting to include the Proposing Person’s direct and indirect ownership interests, derivative interests, dividend and voting rights, and other rights or interests connected to the Company’s stock and updates of the specified required information, if necessary, as of the record date for the applicable meeting. Such additional information is specified in clause (ii)(B) of the second paragraph of Section 1.12 of the Bylaws. The foregoing description of such amendment effected by the adoption of the Bylaws is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the marked copy of the full text of the Bylaws filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 31, 2019, which is incorporated herein by reference.


Item 6.	Exhibits.

The exhibits to this report on Form 10-Q are listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index.

~~SIGNATURES~~

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Charlotte, North Carolina on this 2nd day of November, 2017.



~~ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.~~

~~By:~~	~~/s/ Robert S. McLean~~
	~~Robert S. McLean~~
	~~Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel~~
	~~and Secretary~~

~~By:~~	~~/s/ Steven R. Bower~~
	~~Steven R. Bower~~
	~~Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and~~
	~~Controller~~

EXHIBIT INDEX



2.1	Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of July 19, 2019 between EnPro Industries, Inc., the Sellers listed therein, Shareholder Representative Services LLC, and the Optionholder listed therein relating to the purchase and sale of 100% of the interests of LeanTeq Co., LTD and LeanTeq LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed on July 22, 2019 by EnPro Industries, Inc. (File No. 001-31225)

2.2	Modified Joint Plan of Reorganization of Garlock Sealing Technologies LLC, et al. and OldCo, LLC, Successor by Merger to Coltec Industries Inc dated May 20, 2016, as modified on June 21, 2016, July 29, 2016, December 2, 2016, April 3, 2017, May 14, 2017, May 19, 2017, June 8, 2017, and June 9, 2017, filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina (Charlotte Division) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed on July 31, 2017 by EnPro Industries, Inc. (File No. 001-31225))

3.2	31.1*Amended and Restated Bylaws of EnPro Industries, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 8-K filed on October 31, 2019 by EnPro Industries, Inc. (File No. 001-31225))

10.1	Notice of Grant of Incentive Stock Options and Stock Option Agreement dated as of July 25, 2019 between EnPro Industries, Inc. and Marvin A. Riley (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on July 30, 2019 by EnPro Industries, Inc. (File No. 001-31225)

10.2	Notice of Grant of Nonqualified Stock Options and Stock Option Agreement dated as of July 25, 2019 between EnPro Industries, Inc. and Marvin A. Riley (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed on July 30, 2019 by EnPro Industries, Inc. (File No. 001-31225)

10.3	First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of September 25, 2019 among EnPro Industries, Inc., EnPro Holdings, Inc., the Guarantors party hereto, Lunar Investment, LLC, LeanTeq LLC, the Lenders party hereto and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, Swing Line Lender and L/C Issuer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 25, 2019 filed by EnPro Industries, Inc. (File No. 001-31225))
31.1†	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a)

31.2†	31.2*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a)

32†	32*	Certification pursuant to Section 1350

101.INS*101.SCH†	~~XBRL Instance Document~~

101.SCH*	~~XBRL~~InlineXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL*101.CAL†	~~XBRL~~InlineXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF*101.DEF†	~~XBRL~~InlineXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document

101.LAB*101.LAB†	~~XBRL~~InlineXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE*101.PRE†	~~XBRL~~InlineXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104	Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in the Interactive Data Files submitted as Exhibits 101.*)

† Filed herewith

SIGNATURES



*ENPRO INDUSTRIES, INC.
	~~Filed herewith~~
By:	/s/ Robert S. McLean
	Robert S. McLean
	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary


By:	/s/ Steven R. Bower
	Steven R. Bower
	Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller

6053



	(in millions)
Accounts receivable	$	22.9
Inventories	29.2
Property, plant and equipment	63.2
Goodwill	132.6
Other intangible assets	180.8
Other assets	167.0
Liabilities assumed	(110.5		)
Total purchase price	$	485.2



	(in millions)
Gain on revaluation of investment in GST and OldCo	$	248.3
Elimination of net amounts payable to GST and OldCo at reconsolidation date	286.1
Total	$	534.4



	2017			2016
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$	(363.3	)	$	32.9
Investing activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	(1.8		)	(5.1		)
Proceeds from (payments on) loans to affiliates	43.6			(5.2		)
Proceeds from (purchases of) held-to-maturity securities	250.3			(50.5		)
Opening cash from OldCo	4.8			—
Other	0.1			(0.2		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	297.0			(61.0		)
Financing activities
Capital contribution from parent	45.2			—
Net cash provided by financing activities	45.2			—
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	2.4			1.4
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(18.7		)	(26.7		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	59.5			71.9
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	40.8		$	45.2



	December 31, 2016
Assets:
Notes receivable from affiliate - current	$	12.7
Other current assets	425.9
Asbestos insurance receivable	49.0
Deferred income taxes	126.0
Notes receivable from affiliate	283.2
Other assets	67.0
Total assets	$	963.8
Liabilities and Shareholder’s Equity:
Current liabilities	$	40.3
Other liabilities	126.0
Liabilities subject to compromise (A)	388.6
Total liabilities	554.9
Shareholder’s equity	408.9
Total liabilities and shareholder’s equity	$	963.8



	As of September 30, 2017				As of December 31, 2016
	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
	(in millions)
Amortized:
Customer relationships	$	314.0	$	134.7	$	216.2	$	122.0
Existing technology	110.5		35.5		63.0		31.0
Trademarks	35.7		21.6		35.4		19.6
Other	28.5		22.9		23.2		22.1
	488.7		214.7		337.8		194.7
Indefinite-Lived:
Trademarks	79.3		—		33.8		—
Total	$	568.0	$	214.7	$	371.6	$	194.7



Description	Consolidated Balance Sheets Caption	December 31, 2016
		(in millions)
Due from GST	Accounts receivable, net	$	21.4
Income tax receivable from GST	Deferred income taxes and income tax receivable	$	119.0
Due from GST	Other assets	$	1.4
Due to GST	Accounts payable	$	6.3
Accrued interest to GST	Accrued expenses	$	32.6



Sales	Percent Change Third Quarter 2017 vs. Third Quarter 2016
increase/(decrease)	Acquisitions/Divestiture		Reconsolidation of GST and OldCo		Foreign Currency		Organic		Total
EnPro Industries, Inc.	0.2	%	12.1	%	1.0	%	4.1	%	17.4	%
Sealing Products	0.3	%	19.1	%	0.6	%	1.9	%	21.9	%
Engineered Products	—	%	0.3	%	3.0	%	11.6	%	14.9	%
Power Systems	—	%	3.5	%	—	%	2.0	%	5.5	%