Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.xYESoNO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate website, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files).xYESoNO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” ~~and~~ “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

x~~Large Accelerated Filer~~o~~Accelerated Filer~~o~~Non-Accelerated Filer~~o~~Smaller Reporting Company~~

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).o~~Emerging growth company~~

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).oYESxNO

The number of shares of the registrant's Common Stock outstanding on ~~July 31, 2018~~April 30, 2019 was ~~29,702,912.~~29,746,455.

Part I of this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements are statements that include projections, predictions, expectations or beliefs about future events or results or otherwise are not statements of historical fact. Further, forward-looking statements are intended to speak only as of the date made. Such statements are often characterized by the use of qualifying words (and their derivatives) such as “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan,” “project,” or other statements concerning our opinions or judgment about future events. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, as they will depend on many factors about which we are unsure, including many factors which are beyond our control. Factors that could influence the accuracy of such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the financial success or changing strategies of our customers, our level of success in integrating acquisitions, actions of government regulators, the level of market interest rates, and general economic conditions. For additional information about factors that could affect the matters discussed in this paragraph, see the “Risk Factors” section of our ~~2017~~2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

($ in thousands-unaudited)	June 30, 2018			December 31, 2017 (audited)			June 30, 2017
($ in thousands)										March 31, 2019 (unaudited)			December 31, 2018			March 31, 2018 (unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks, noninterest-bearing	$	97,163			114,301			80,234		$	80,620			56,050			78,217
Due from banks, interest-bearing		462,972			375,189			337,326			366,187			406,848			448,515
Total cash and cash equivalents		560,135			489,490			417,560			446,807			462,898			526,732

Securities available for sale		334,068			343,270			207,496			639,609			501,351			341,001
Securities held to maturity (fair values of $107,068, $118,998, and $129,697)		108,265			118,503			127,866
Securities held to maturity (fair values of $90,280, $99,906, and $111,201)											90,903			101,237			112,058

Presold mortgages in process of settlement		9,311			12,459			13,071			3,318			4,279			6,029

Loans		4,149,390			4,042,369			3,375,976			4,303,787			4,249,064			4,113,785
Allowance for loan losses		(23,298	)		(23,298	)		(24,025	)		(21,095	)		(21,039	)		(23,298	)
Net loans		4,126,092			4,019,071			3,351,951			4,282,692			4,228,025			4,090,487

Premises and equipment		113,774			116,233			96,605			137,725			119,000			115,542
Accrued interest receivable		13,930			14,094			10,830			16,516			16,004			13,270
Goodwill		232,458			233,070			139,124			234,368			234,368			231,681
Other intangible assets		23,152			24,437			12,132			20,081			21,112			24,079
Foreclosed real estate		8,296			12,571			11,196			6,390			7,440			11,307
Bank-owned life insurance		100,413			99,162			87,501			102,524			101,878			99,786
Other assets		87,706			64,677			53,288			69,315			66,524			69,555
Total assets	$	5,717,600			5,547,037			4,528,620		$	6,050,248			5,864,116			5,641,527

LIABILITIES
Deposits: Noninterest bearing checking accounts	$	1,252,214			1,196,161			990,004		$	1,390,516			1,320,131			1,227,608
Interest bearing checking accounts		915,666			884,254			728,973			922,254			916,374			896,189
Money market accounts		1,021,659			984,945			782,963			1,079,002			1,035,523			1,035,261
Savings accounts		440,475			454,860			411,814			417,812			432,389			445,405
Time deposits of $100,000 or more		647,206			593,123			479,839			726,192			690,922			606,313
Other time deposits		276,401			293,612			250,737			261,462			264,000			284,932
Total deposits		4,553,621			4,406,955			3,644,330			4,797,238			4,659,339			4,495,708
Borrowings		407,076			407,543			355,405			406,125			406,609			407,059
Accrued interest payable		1,651			1,235			1,014			2,341			1,976			1,306
Other liabilities		30,530			38,325			27,220			56,405			31,962			31,804
Total liabilities		4,992,878			4,854,058			4,027,969			5,262,109			5,099,886			4,935,877

Commitments and contingencies

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, no par value per share. Authorized: 5,000,000 shares
Series C, convertible, issued & outstanding: none, none, and none		—			—			—
Issued & outstanding: none, none, and none											—			—			—
Common stock, no par value per share. Authorized: 40,000,000 shares
Issued & outstanding: 29,702,912, 29,639,374, and 24,678,295 shares		434,117			432,794			262,901
Issued & outstanding: 29,746,455, 29,724,874, and 29,660,990 shares											434,948			434,453			433,305
Retained earnings		301,800			264,331			240,682			360,455			341,738			282,038
Stock in rabbi trust assumed in acquisition		(3,214	)		(3,581	)		(4,257	)		(3,245	)		(3,235	)		(3,588	)
Rabbi trust obligation		3,214			3,581			4,257			3,245			3,235			3,588
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(11,195	)		(4,146	)		(2,932	)		(7,264	)		(11,961	)		(9,693	)
Total shareholders’ equity		724,722			692,979			500,651			788,139			764,230			705,650
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	5,717,600			5,547,037			4,528,620		$	6,050,248			5,864,116			5,641,527

($ in thousands, except share data-unaudited)	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018
INTEREST INCOME
Interest and fees on loans	$	51,451			39,656			101,621			73,359		$	53,960			50,170
Interest on investment securities:
Taxable interest income		2,465			1,710			5,051			3,265			4,737			2,586
Tax-exempt interest income		368			427			748			870			337			380
Other, principally overnight investments		2,451			1,034			4,376			1,801			2,701			1,925
Total interest income		56,735			42,827			111,796			79,295			61,735			55,061

INTEREST EXPENSE
Savings, checking and money market accounts		1,132			685			2,111			1,207			2,009			979
Time deposits of $100,000 or more		1,850			874			3,325			1,588			3,178			1,411
Other time deposits		251			173			470			339			390			283
Borrowings		2,270			1,179			4,151			1,949			2,797			1,881
Total interest expense		5,503			2,911			10,057			5,083			8,374			4,554

Net interest income		51,232			39,916			101,739			74,212			53,361			50,507
Provision (reversal) for loan losses		(710	)		—			(4,369	)		723			500			(3,659	)
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		51,942			39,916			106,108			73,489			52,861			54,166

NONINTEREST INCOME
Service charges on deposit accounts		3,122			2,966			6,385			5,580			2,945			3,263
Other service charges, commissions and fees		4,913			3,554			9,510			6,727			5,248			4,485
Fees from presold mortgage loans		796			1,511			1,655			2,279			545			859
Commissions from sales of insurance and financial products		2,119			1,038			4,059			1,878			2,029			1,940
SBA consulting fees		1,126			1,050			2,267			2,310			1,263			1,141
SBA loan sale gains		2,598			927			6,400			1,549			2,062			3,802
Bank-owned life insurance income		628			580			1,251			1,088			646			623
Foreclosed property gains (losses), net		(99	)		(248	)		(387	)		(223	)		(245	)		(288	)
Securities gains (losses), net		—			—			—			(235	)
Other gains (losses), net		908			497			912			731			82			4
Total noninterest income		16,111			11,875			32,052			21,684			14,575			15,829

NONINTEREST EXPENSES
Salaries expense		18,446			16,299			37,844			30,249			18,965			19,398
Employee benefits expense		4,084			4,042			8,691			7,952			4,588			4,607
Total personnel expense		22,530			20,341			46,535			38,201			23,553			24,005
Occupancy expense		2,543			2,358			5,345			4,542			2,754			2,802
Equipment related expenses		1,241			1,363			2,493			2,421			1,369			1,252
Merger and acquisition expenses		640			1,122			3,401			3,495			110			2,761
Intangibles amortization expense		1,745			1,031			3,417			1,607			1,332			1,560
Other operating expenses		10,174			8,869			21,280			16,890			10,153			11,106
Total noninterest expenses		38,873			35,084			82,471			67,156			39,271			43,486

Income before income taxes		29,180			16,707			55,689			28,017			28,165			26,509
Income tax expense		6,450			5,553			12,286			9,308			5,880			5,836

Net income available to common shareholders	$	22,730			11,154			43,403			18,709		$	22,285			20,673

Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.77			0.45			1.47			0.80		$	0.75			0.70
Diluted		0.77			0.45			1.46			0.80			0.75			0.70

Dividends declared per common share	$	0.10			0.08			0.20			0.16		$	0.12			0.10

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		29,544,747			24,593,307			29,539,308			23,288,635			29,587,217			29,533,869
Diluted		29,632,738			24,671,550			29,630,822			23,368,503			29,743,395			29,624,150

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
($ in thousands-unaudited)	2018			2017			2018			2017			2019			2018

Net income	$	22,730			11,154			43,403			18,709		$	22,285			20,673
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale:
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period, pretax		(2,012	)		1,989			(9,302	)		3,102			5,903			(7,290	)
Tax (expense) benefit		471			(737	)		2,174			(1,144	)		(1,380	)		1,703
Reclassification to realized (gains) losses		—			—			—			235
Tax expense (benefit)		—			—			—			(87	)
Postretirement Plans:
Amortization of unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss		51			54			103			105
Tax expense (benefit)		(12	)		(16	)		(24	)		(36	)
Amortization of unrecognized net actuarial loss														228			52
Tax benefit														(54	)		(12	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(1,502	)		1,290			(7,049	)		2,175			4,697			(5,547	)

Comprehensive income	$	21,228			12,444			36,354			20,884		$	26,982			15,126

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
($ in thousands-unaudited)	2018			2017			2019			2018
Cash Flows From Operating Activities
Net income	$	43,403			18,709		$	22,285			20,673
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision (reversal) for loan losses		(4,369	)		723			500			(3,659	)
Net security premium amortization		1,476			1,470			459			685
Loan discount accretion		(4,407	)		(3,328	)		(1,419	)		(2,111	)
Purchase accounting accretion and amortization, net		(125	)		(122	)
Other purchase accounting accretion and amortization, net								(13	)		(71	)
Foreclosed property (gains) losses and write-downs, net		387			223			245			288
Loss (gain) on securities available for sale		—			235
Other losses (gains)		(912	)		(731	)		(82	)		(4	)
Decrease (increase) in net deferred loan fees		(955	)		759
Increase in net deferred loan costs								(325	)		(786	)
Depreciation of premises and equipment		2,859			2,708			1,468			1,445
Amortization of operating lease right-of-use assets								475			—
Repayments of lease obligations								(455	)		—
Stock-based compensation expense		827			683			403			231
Amortization of intangible assets		3,417			1,607			1,332			1,560
Fees/gains from sale of presold mortgages and SBA loans		(8,055	)		(3,828	)		(2,607	)		(4,661	)
Origination of presold mortgages in process of settlement		(70,056	)		(109,454	)
Proceeds from sales of presold mortgages in process of settlement		74,729			107,986
Origination of presold mortgage loans in process of settlement								(19,025	)		(33,834	)
Proceeds from sales of presold mortgage loans in process of settlement								20,506			40,945
Origination of SBA loans for sale		(110,116	)		(27,432	)		(38,329	)		(63,040	)
Proceeds from sales of SBA loans		88,811			22,260			30,678			50,996
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable		164			(27	)		(512	)		824
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(14,988	)		2,810			(4,194	)		2,142
Increase in accrued interest payable		416			211			365			71
Decrease in other liabilities		(7,504	)		(11,886	)
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities		(4,998	)		3,576
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities								5,254			(6,279	)
Net cash provided by operating activities								17,009			5,415

Cash Flows From Investing Activities
Purchases of securities available for sale		(18,850	)		(29,809	)		(161,892	)		(13,182	)
Purchases of securities held to maturity		—			(291	)
Proceeds from maturities/issuer calls of securities available for sale		17,835			15,497			29,313			7,764
Proceeds from maturities/issuer calls of securities held to maturity		9,679			13,683			10,098			6,159
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale		—			45,601
Purchases of Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, net		(6,099	)		(6,527	)		(308	)		(6,099	)
Net increase in loans		(73,471	)		(162,197	)		(45,018	)		(49,662	)
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed real estate		4,619			4,610			1,513			1,455
Purchases of premises and equipment		(1,959	)		(2,135	)		(1,450	)		(1,224	)
Proceeds from sales of premises and equipment		2,579			—			279			540
Net cash received in acquisition		—			56,185
Net cash used by investing activities		(65,667	)		(65,383	)		(167,465	)		(54,249	)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities
Net increase in deposits		146,882			111,756			137,957			88,869
Net increase (decrease) in borrowings		(558	)		64,973
Net decrease in borrowings								(529	)		(529	)
Cash dividends paid – common stock		(5,338	)		(3,642	)		(2,972	)		(2,372	)
Proceeds from stock option exercises		324			287			—			108
Stock withheld for payment of taxes								(91	)		—
Net cash provided by financing activities		141,310			173,374			134,365			86,076

Increase in cash and cash equivalents		70,645			111,567
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents								(16,091	)		37,242
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		489,490			305,993			462,898			489,490

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	560,135			417,560		$	446,807			526,732

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
Interest	$	9,641			4,872		$	8,009			4,483
Income taxes		10,190			8,570			103			(181	)
Non-cash transactions:
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of taxes		(7,128	)		2,106			4,523			(5,587	)
Foreclosed loans transferred to other real estate		1,913			3,415			708			648
Initial recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets								19,459			—
Initial recognition of operating lease liabilities								19,459			—

In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of the Company as of ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018 ~~and 2017~~ and the consolidated results of operations and consolidated cash flows for the periods ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 and ~~2017.~~2018. All such adjustments were of a normal, recurring nature. Reference is made to the ~~2017~~2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the ~~SEC~~Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for a discussion of accounting policies and other relevant information with respect to the financial statements. The results of operations for the periods ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018 ~~and 2017~~ are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The Company has evaluated all subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued.

Note 1 to the ~~2017~~2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC contains a description of the accounting policies followed by the Company and a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements. The following paragraphs update that information as necessary.

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance to change the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers. The core principle of the new guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to reflect the transfer of goods and services to customers in an amount equal to the consideration the entity receives or expects to receive. The Company’s revenue is comprised of net interest income and noninterest income. The scope of the guidance explicitly excludes net interest income as well as many other revenues for financial assets and liabilities including loans, leases, securities, and derivatives. Accordingly, the majority of the Company’s revenues were not affected. The guidance was effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and the Company adopted the guidance using the modified retrospective method. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB amended the Financial Instruments topic of the Accounting Standards Codification to address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. This update is intended to improve the recognition and measurement of financial instruments and it requires an entity to: (i) measure equity investments at fair value through net income, with certain exceptions; (ii) present in other comprehensive income the changes in instrument-specific credit risk for financial liabilities measured using the fair value option; (iii) present financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset; (iv) calculate the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes based on an exit price and; (v) assess a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets related to unrealized losses of available for sale debt securities in combination with other deferred tax assets. The guidance also provides an election to subsequently measure certain nonmarketable equity investments at cost less any impairment and adjusted for certain observable price changes and requires a qualitative impairment assessment of such equity investments and amends certain fair value disclosure requirements. The amendments were effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and the adoption of the guidance did not have a material effect on its financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB amended the Liabilities topic of the Accounting Standards Codification to address the current and potential future diversity in practice related to the derecognition of a prepaid stored-value product liability. The amendments were effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and did not have a material effect on its financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB amended the requirements in the Compensation—Retirement Benefits topic of the Accounting Standards Codification related to the income statement presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost for an entity’s sponsored defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The amendments require that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net periodic benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component. The amendments were effective for the Company on January 1, 2018 and did not have a material effect on its financial statements.

In February 2018, the FASB issued guidance related to the Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income topic of the Accounting Standards Codification, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The guidance will be effective for all annual and interim periods beginning January 1, 2019 with early adoption permitted. The Company chose to early adopt the new standard for the year ending December 31, 2017, as allowed under the new standard, and reclassified $0.7 million between Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and Retained Earnings.

In February 2016, the ~~FASB~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidance on accounting for leases, which generally requires all leases to be recognized in the statement of financial position by recording an asset representing its right to use the underlying asset and recording a liability, which represents the Company’s obligation to make lease payments. The ~~provisions~~new standard was adopted by the Company on January 1, 2019. The guidance provides for a modified retrospective transition approach requiring lessees to recognize and measure leases on the balance sheet at the beginning of either the earliest period presented or as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company elected to apply the guidance as of the beginning of the period of adoption (January 1, 2019) and will not restate comparative periods. Adoption of the guidance resulted in the recognition of lease liabilities and the recognition of right-of-use assets totaling $19.4 million as of the date of adoption. Lease liabilities and right-of-use assets are reflected in other liabilities and premises and equipment, respectively. The initial balance sheet gross-up upon adoption was related to operating leases of certain real estate properties. The Company has no finance leases or material subleases or leasing arrangements for which it is the lessor of property or equipment. The Company elected to apply the package of practical expedients allowed by the new standard under which the Company need not reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are leases or contain leases, the Company need not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing lease, and the Company need not reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases. Adoption of this guidance ~~are~~did not have a material impact on the consolidated statements of income or the consolidated statements of cash flows. See Note 13 – Leases for additional disclosures related to leases.

In March 2017, the FASB amended the requirements in the Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs topic of the Accounting Standards Codification related to the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. The amendments shorten the amortization period for the premium to the earliest call date. The amendments were effective for ~~reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018; early~~the Company on January 1, 2019 and adoption ~~is permitted. The Company does~~did not ~~expect these amendments to~~ have a material effect on its financial statements.

In June 2018, the FASB amended the Compensation—Stock Compensation Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments expand the scope of this Topic to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. The amendments were effective for the Company on January 1, 2019 and the adoption did not have a material effect on its financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance to change the accounting for credit losses. The guidance requires an entity to utilize a new impairment model known as the current expected credit loss ("CECL") model to estimate its lifetime "expected credit loss" and record an allowance that, when deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset, presents the net amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The CECL model is expected to result in earlier recognition of credit losses. The guidance also requires new disclosures for financial assets measured at amortized cost, loans and available-for-sale debt securities. The Company will apply the guidance through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the year of adoption. While early adoption is permitted beginning in first quarter 2019, the Company ~~does~~did not ~~expect to~~ elect that option. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company ~~is currently evaluating~~continues its ongoing analysis on the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial ~~statements; however,~~statements. In that regard, a cross-functional working group has been formed, under the direction of the Company's Chief Financial Officer. The working group is comprised of individuals from various functional areas including credit, risk management, finance and information technology, among others. Implementation efforts continue with model development, ongoing system requirements evaluation and the identification of data and resource needs, among other things. The Company has also engaged a third-party vendor solution to assist in the application of the new guidance. The Company has provided core data to the vendor and continues to validate and enhance the data. The Company is currently running models under both the current methodology and the CECL methodology. While the Company ~~expects~~is currently unable to reasonably estimate the impact of adopting the guidance, the impact of adoption is expected to be significantly influenced by the composition, characteristics and quality of loan and securities portfolios as well as the prevailing economic conditions and forecasts as of the adoption ~~of this guidance will result in a significant increase in its recorded allowance for loan losses.~~date.

In January 2017, the FASB amended the Goodwill and Other Intangibles topic of the Accounting Standards Codification to simplify the accounting for goodwill impairment for public business entities and other entities that have goodwill reported in their financial statements and have not elected the private company alternative for the subsequent measurement of goodwill. The amendment removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. The amount of goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The effective date and transition requirements for the technical corrections will be effective for the Company for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company does not expect this amendment to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In ~~March 2017,~~August 2018, the FASB amended the Fair Value Measurement Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments remove, modify, and add certain fair value disclosure requirements based on the concepts in the ~~Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees~~FASB Concepts Statement,Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting—Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and ~~Other Costs topic~~interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. An entity is permitted to early adopt any removed or modified disclosures upon issuance of this guidance and delay adoption of the additional disclosures until their effective date. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB amended the Compensation - Retirement Benefits – Defined Benefit Plans Topic of the Accounting Standards Codification ~~related~~ to improve disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans. The guidance removes disclosures that are no longer considered cost-beneficial, clarifies the ~~amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium.~~specific requirements of disclosures, and adds disclosure requirements identified as relevant. The amendments ~~shorten the amortization period for the premium to the earliest call date. The amendments will be~~are effective for ~~the Company for~~fiscal years, and interim ~~and annual~~ periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, ~~2018.~~2020. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

In ~~June 2018,~~March 2019, the FASB ~~amended~~issued guidance to address concerns companies had raised about an accounting exception they would lose when assessing the ~~Compensation—Stock Compensation Topic~~fair value of underlying assets under the ~~Accounting Standards Codification.~~leases standard and clarify that lessees and lessors are exempt from a certain interim disclosure requirement associated with adopting the new standard. The amendments ~~expand the scope of this Topic to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. The amendments are~~will be effective for ~~fiscal years~~the Company for reporting periods beginning after December 15, ~~2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year.~~2019. Early adoption is ~~permitted, but no earlier than an entity’s adoption date of the Revenue from Contracts with Customers Topic.~~permitted. The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Certain amounts reported in the period ended ~~June 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation for ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019. These reclassifications had no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity for the periods presented, nor did they materially impact trends in financial information.

Since January 1, 2017, the Company completed the acquisitions described below. The results of each acquired company are included in the Company’s results beginning on its respective acquisition date.

Carolina Bank Holdings, Inc. was the parent company of Carolina Bank, a North Carolina state-charted bank with eight bank branches located in the North Carolina cities of Greensboro, High Point, Burlington, Winston-Salem, and Asheboro, and mortgage offices in Burlington, Hillsborough, and Sanford. The acquisition complemented the Company’s expansion into several of these high-growth markets and increased its market share in others with facilities, operations and experienced staff already in place. The Company was willing to record goodwill primarily due to the reasons just noted, as well as the positive earnings of Carolina Bank. The total merger consideration consisted of $25.3 million in cash and 3,799,471 shares of the Company’s common stock, with each share of Carolina Bank common stock being exchanged for either $20.00 in cash or 1.002 shares of the Company’s stock, subject to the total consideration being 75% stock / 25% cash. The issuance of common stock was valued at $114.5 million and was based on the Company’s closing stock price on March 3, 2017 of $30.13 per share.

This acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, and accordingly, the assets and liabilities of Carolina Bank were recorded based on estimates of fair values as of March 3, 2017. The Company was able to change its valuations of acquired Carolina Bank assets and liabilities for up to one year after the acquisition date. The table below is a condensed balance sheet disclosing the amount assigned to each major asset and liability category of Carolina Bank on March 3, 2017, and the related fair value adjustments recorded by the Company to reflect the acquisition. The $65.1 million in goodwill that resulted from this transaction is non-deductible for tax purposes.

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of the Company and Carolina Bank as if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2016, after giving effect to certain adjustments, including amortization of the core deposit intangible, and related income tax effects. The pro forma financial information does not necessarily reflect the results of operations that would have occurred had the Company and Carolina Bank constituted a single entity during such period.

The above pro forma results for the six months ended June 30, 2017 include merger-related expenses and charges recorded by Carolina Bank prior to the acquisition that are nonrecurring in nature and amounted to $4.6 million pretax, or $3.1 million after-tax ($0.12 per basic and diluted share).

Bear Insurance, an insurance agency based in Albemarle, North Carolina, with four locations in Stanly, Cabarrus, and Montgomery counties and annual commission income of approximately $4 million, represented an opportunity to complement the Company’s insurance agency operations in these markets and the surrounding areas. Also, this acquisition provided the Company with a larger platform for leveraging insurance services throughout the Company’s bank branch network. The transaction value was $9.8 million, with the Company paying $7.9 million in cash and issuing 13,374 shares of its common stock, which had a value of approximately $0.4 million. Per the terms of the agreement, the Company also recorded an earn-out liability valued at $1.2 million, which will be paid as a cash distribution after a four-year period if pre-determined goals are met for the periods.

This acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, and accordingly, the assets and liabilities of Bear Insurance were recorded based on estimates of fair values as of September 1, 2017. In connection with this acquisition, the Company recorded $5.3 million in goodwill, which is deductible for tax purposes, and $3.9 million in other amortizable intangible assets, which are also deductible for tax purposes.

ASB Bancorp, Inc. was the parent company of Asheville Savings Bank, a North Carolina state-chartered savings bank with eight bank branches located in Buncombe County, North Carolina and five bank branches located in the counties of Henderson, Madison, McDowell and Transylvania, all in North Carolina. The acquisition complemented the Company’s existing presence in the Asheville and surrounding markets, which are high-growth and highly desired markets. The Company was willing to record goodwill primarily due to the reasons just noted, as well as the positive earnings of Asheville Savings Bank. The total merger consideration consisted of $17.9 million in cash and 4,920,061 shares of the Company’s common stock, with each share of Asheville Savings Bank common stock being exchanged for either $41.90 in cash or 1.44 shares of the Company’s stock, subject to the total consideration being 90% stock / 10% cash. The issuance of common stock was valued at $169.3 million and was based on the Company’s closing stock price on September 30, 2017 of $34.41 per share.

This acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting for business combinations, and accordingly, the assets and liabilities of Asheville Savings Bank were recorded based on estimates of fair values as of October 1, 2017. The Company may change its valuations of acquired Asheville Savings Bank assets and liabilities for up to one year after the acquisition date. The table below is a condensed balance sheet disclosing the amount assigned to each major asset and liability category of Asheville Savings Bank on October 1, 2017, and the related fair value adjustments recorded by the Company to reflect the acquisition. The $88.2 million in goodwill that resulted from this acquisition is non-deductible for tax purposes.

The Company recorded total stock-based compensation expense of ~~$596,000~~$403,000 and ~~$479,000~~$231,000 for the three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017, respectively, and $827,000 and $683,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017,~~ respectively. Of the $827,000 in expense that was recorded in 2018, approximately $352,000 related to the June 1, 2018 director grants, which are classified as “other operating expenses” in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The remaining $475,000 in expense relates to the employee grants discussed below and is recorded as “salaries expense.” Stock based compensation is reflected as an adjustment to cash flows from operating activities on the Company’s consolidated statement of cash flows. The Company recognized ~~$193,000~~

$94,000 and ~~$243,000~~$54,000 of income tax benefits related to stock based compensation expense in its consolidated income statement for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively.

At ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, the Company had ~~two~~the following stock-based compensation ~~plans – 1)~~plans: the First Bancorp 2014 Equity Plan and 2) the First Bancorp 2007 Equity Plan. The Company’s shareholders approved each plan. The First Bancorp 2014 Equity Plan became effective upon the approval of shareholders on May 8, 2014. As of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, the First Bancorp 2014 Equity Plan was the only plan that had shares available for future grants, and there were ~~771,477~~727,934 shares remaining available for grant.

The First Bancorp 2014 Equity Plan is intended to serve as a means to attract, retain and motivate key employees and directors and to associate the interests of the Plan’s participants with those of the Company and its shareholders. The First Bancorp 2014 Equity Plan allows for both grants of stock options and other types of equity-based compensation, including stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted performance stock, unrestricted stock, and performance units.

Recent equity ~~grants~~awards have ~~had~~been shares of restricted stock with service vesting ~~conditions.~~conditions only. Compensation expense for these ~~grants~~awards is recorded over the requisite service periods. ~~No compensation cost is recognized for grants that do not vest and~~Upon forfeiture, any previously recognized compensation cost is ~~reversed at forfeiture. The Company issues new shares of common stock when options~~reversed. Upon a change in control (as defined in the plans), unless the awards remain outstanding or substitute equivalent awards are ~~exercised.~~provided, the awards become immediately vested.

Certain of the Company’s ~~equity grants~~stock awards contain terms that provide for a graded vesting schedule whereby portions of the award vest in increments over the requisite service period. The Company recognizes compensation expense for awards with graded vesting schedules on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each incremental award. Compensation expense is based on the estimated number of stock options and awards that will ultimately vest. Over the past five years, there have only been minimal amounts of forfeitures, and therefore the Company assumes that all awards granted with service conditions only will vest. The Company issues new shares of common stock when options are exercised.

As it relates to director equity ~~grants,~~awards, the Company grants common shares, valued at approximately $32,000 to each non-employee director (currently 11 in total) in June of each year. Compensation expense associated with these director ~~grants~~awards is recognized on the date of ~~grant~~award since there are no vesting conditions. On June 1, 2018, the Company granted 8,393 shares of common stock to non-employee directors (763 shares per director), at a fair market value of $41.93 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock on that date, and which resulted in $352,000 in expense. On June 1, 2017, the Company granted 11,190 shares of common stock to non-employee directors (1,119 shares per director), at a fair market value of $28.59 per share, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock on that date, and which resulted in $320,000 in expense.

The Company’s senior officers receive their annual bonuses earned under the Company’s annual incentive plan in a mix of 50% cash and 50% stock, with the stock being subject to a three year vesting term. In the last three years, a total of 54,529 shares of restricted stock have been granted related to performance in the preceding fiscal years (net of an immaterial amount of forfeitures). Total compensation expense associated with those grants was $1.4 million and is being recognized over the respective vesting periods. For the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, total compensation expense related to these grants was $73,000 and $66,000, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, total compensation expense was $147,000 and $151,000, respectively. The Company expects to record $73,000 in compensation expense during each remaining quarter of 2018.

In the last three years, the Compensation Committee also granted 101,156 shares of stock to various employees of the Company to promote retention (net of an immaterial amount of forfeitures). The total value associated with these grants amounted to $2.7 million, which is being recorded as an expense over their three year vesting periods. For the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, total compensation expense related to these grants was $173,000 and $89,000, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, total compensation expense was $328,000 and $186,000, respectively. The Company expects to record $211,000 in compensation expense during each remaining quarter of 2018. All grants were issued based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant.

~~The following table presents information regarding the activity the first six months of 2018 related to the Company’s outstanding restricted stock:~~

In years prior to 2009, stock options were the primary form of equity grant utilized by the Company. The stock options had a term of ten years. Upon a change in control (as defined in the plans), unless the awards remain outstanding or substitute equivalent awards are provided, the awards become immediately vested.

~~At June 30, 2018, there were 9,000 stock options outstanding related to the Company’s two equity-based plans, all with an exercise price of $14.35.~~

The following table presents information regarding the activity for the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2018~~2019 related to the Company’s outstanding restricted stock:

Total unrecognized compensation expense as of March 31, 2019 amounted to $2,737,000 with a weighted-average remaining term of 2.2 years. The Company expects to record $379,000 in compensation expense during each remaining quarter of 2019.

Prior to 2010, stock options ~~outstanding:~~were the primary form of equity based compensation utilized by the Company. The stock options had a term of ten years.

At March 31, 2019, there were 9,000 stock options outstanding each having an exercise price of $14.35 and an expiration date of June 1, 2019.

The following table presents information regarding the activity for the first three months of 2019 related to the Company’s outstanding stock options:

During the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company received ~~$216,000~~$0 and ~~$324,000,~~$108,000, respectively, as a result of stock option exercises. ~~During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company received $242,000 and $287,000, respectively, as a result of stock option exercises.~~

Basic Earnings Per Common Share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding unvested shares of restricted stock. Diluted Earnings Per Common Share is computed by assuming the issuance of common shares for all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the reporting period. For the periods presented, the Company’s potentially dilutive common stock issuances related to unvested shares of restricted stock and stock option grants under the Company’s equity-based plans.

In computing Diluted Earnings Per Common Share, adjustments are made to the computation of Basic Earnings Per Common shares, as follows. As it relates to unvested shares of restricted stock, the number of shares added to the denominator is equal to the number of unvested shares less the assumed number of shares bought back by the Company in the open market at the average market price with the amount of proceeds being equal to the average deferred compensation for the reporting period. As it relates to stock options, it is assumed that all dilutive stock options are exercised during the reporting period at their respective exercise prices, with the proceeds from the exercises used by the Company to buy back stock in the open market at the average market price in effect during the reporting period. The difference between the number of shares assumed to be exercised and the number of shares bought back is included in the calculation of dilutive securities. As it relates to contingently issuable shares, the number of shares that are included in the calculation of dilutive securities is based on the number of shares that are issuable if the end of the reporting period were the end of the contingency period.

If any of the potentially dilutive common stock issuances have an anti-dilutive effect, the potentially dilutive common stock issuance is disregarded.

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in computing Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Common Share:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,												For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018						2017						2019						2018
($ in thousands except per share amounts)	Income (Numer- ator)		Shares (Denom- inator)		Per Share Amount		Income (Numer- ator)		Shares (Denom- inator)		Per Share Amount		Income (Numer- ator)		Shares (Denom- inator)		Per Share Amount		Income (Numer- ator)		Shares (Denom- inator)		Per Share Amount

Basic EPS
Net income available to common shareholders	$	22,730		29,544,747	$	0.77	$	11,154		24,593,307	$	0.45	$	22,285		29,587,217	$	0.75	$	20,673		29,533,869	$	0.70

Effect of Dilutive Securities		—		87,991				—		78,243				—		156,178				—		90,281

Diluted EPS per common share	$	22,730		29,632,738	$	0.77	$	11,154		24,671,550	$	0.45	$	22,285		29,743,395	$	0.75	$	20,673		29,624,150	$	0.70

For both the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ there were no options that were antidilutive.

The book values and approximate fair values of investment securities at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 are summarized as follows:

	June 30, 2018									December 31, 2017									March 31, 2019									December 31, 2018
	Amortized		Fair		Unrealized					Amortized		Fair		Unrealized					Amortized		Fair		Unrealized					Amortized		Fair		Unrealized
($ in thousands)	Cost		Value		Gains		(Losses)			Cost		Value		Gains		(Losses)			Cost		Value		Gains		(Losses)			Cost		Value		Gains		(Losses)

Securities available for sale:
Government-sponsored enterprise securities	$	19,000		18,537		—		(463	)		14,000		13,867		—		(133	)	$	78,995		78,887		84		(192	)		82,995		82,662		63		(396	)
Mortgage-backed securities		292,809		282,287		48		(10,570	)		297,690		295,213		246		(2,722	)		533,360		526,948		1,089		(7,501	)		396,995		385,551		39		(11,483	)
Corporate bonds		33,772		33,244		64		(592	)		33,792		34,190		512		(114	)		33,741		33,774		203		(170	)		33,751		33,138		76		(689	)
Total available for sale	$	345,581		334,068		112		(11,625	)		345,482		343,270		758		(2,969	)	$	646,096		639,609		1,376		(7,863	)		513,741		501,351		178		(12,568	)

Securities held to maturity:
Mortgage-backed securities	$	57,807		55,832		—		(1,975	)		63,829		63,092		—		(737	)	$	49,361		48,291		—		(1,070	)		52,048		50,241		—		(1,807	)
State and local governments		50,458		51,236		836		(58	)		54,674		55,906		1,280		(48	)		41,542		41,989		465		(18	)		49,189		49,665		525		(49	)
Total held to maturity	$	108,265		107,068		836		(2,033	)		118,503		118,998		1,280		(785	)	$	90,903		90,280		465		(1,088	)		101,237		99,906		525		(1,856	)

All of the Company’s mortgage-backed securities ~~including commercial mortgage-backed obligations,~~ were issued by government-sponsored corporations, except for ~~two~~ private mortgage-backed securities with a fair value of ~~$1.1~~$1.0 million as of ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

The following table presents information regarding securities with unrealized losses at ~~June 30, 2018:~~March 31, 2019:

($ in thousands)	Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position for Less than 12 Months				Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position for More than 12 Months				Total				Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position for Less than 12 Months				Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position for More than 12 Months				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Government-sponsored enterprise securities	$	15,615		385		2,922		78		18,537		463	$	—		—		18,808		192		18,808		192
Mortgage-backed securities		224,713		8,050		110,958		4,495		335,671		12,545		70,478		346		298,133		8,225		368,611		8,571
Corporate bonds		25,697		530		938		62		26,635		592		2,480		60		9,049		110		11,529		170
State and local governments		9,360		58		—		—		9,360		58		—		—		5,823		18		5,823		18
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	275,385		9,023		114,818		4,635		390,203		13,658	$	72,958		406		331,813		8,545		404,771		8,951

The following table presents information regarding securities with unrealized losses at December 31, ~~2017:~~2018:

($ in thousands)	Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position for Less than 12 Months				Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position for More than 12 Months				Total				Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position for Less than 12 Months				Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position for More than 12 Months				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Government-sponsored enterprise securities	$	10,897		103		2,970		30		13,867		133	$	4,921		78		13,682		318		18,603		396
Mortgage-backed securities		192,702		1,582		125,060		1,877		317,762		3,459		82,525		351		294,305		12,939		376,830		13,290
Corporate bonds		2,500		49		935		65		3,435		114		20,704		433		5,817		256		26,521		689
State and local governments		7,928		48		—		—		7,928		48		595		1		6,641		48		7,236		49
Total temporarily impaired securities	$	214,027		1,782		128,965		1,972		342,992		3,754	$	108,745		863		320,445		13,561		429,190		14,424

In the above tables, all of the securities that were in an unrealized loss position at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 were bonds that the Company has determined ~~were~~are in a loss position due primarily to interest rate factors and not credit quality concerns. The Company evaluated the collectability of each of these bonds and concluded that there was no other-than-temporary impairment. The Company does not intend to sell these securities, and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell these securities before recovery of the amortized cost.

The book values and approximate fair values of investment securities at ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, by contractual maturity, are summarized in the table below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

	Securities Available for Sale				Securities Held to Maturity				Securities Available for Sale				Securities Held to Maturity
	Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair		Amortized		Fair
($ in thousands)	Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value

Securities
Due within one year	$	—		—		3,248		3,276	$	—		—		865		868
Due after one year but within five years		40,227		39,324		28,348		28,815		105,196		105,195		26,571		26,860
Due after five years but within ten years		7,545		7,460		17,066		17,355		2,540		2,480		12,427		12,559
Due after ten years		5,000		4,997		1,796		1,790		5,000		4,986		1,679		1,702
Mortgage-backed securities		292,809		282,287		57,807		55,832		533,360		526,948		49,361		48,291
Total securities	$	345,581		334,068		108,265		107,068	$	646,096		639,609		90,903		90,280

At ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018 investment securities with carrying values of ~~$233,437,000~~$245,711,000 and ~~$176,813,000,~~$284,382,000, respectively, were pledged as collateral for public deposits.

In the first six months of 2017, the Company received proceeds from sales of securities of $45,601,000 and recorded losses of $235,000 from the sales. There were no securities sales in the first six months of 2018.

Included in “other assets” in the ~~consolidated balance sheets~~Consolidated Balance Sheets are ~~cost method~~cost-method investments in Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) ~~stock~~ and Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (“FRB”) stock totaling ~~$37,437,000~~$37,776,000 and ~~$31,338,000~~$37,468,000 at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. The FHLB stock had a cost of $20,322,000 and ~~fair value of~~ $20,036,000 ~~and $19,647,000~~ at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, and serves as part of the collateral for the Company’s line of credit with the FHLB and is also a requirement for membership in the FHLB system. The FRB stock had a cost of $17,454,000 and ~~fair value of $17,401,000 and $11,691,000~~$17,432,000 at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, respectively, and is a requirement for FRB member bank qualification. Periodically, both the FHLB and FRB recalculate the Company’s required level of holdings, and the Company either buys more stock or redeems a portion of the stock at cost. The Company determined that neither stock was impaired at either period end.

The Company owns 12,356 Class B shares of Visa, Inc. (“Visa”) stock that were received upon Visa’s initial public offering. These shares are expected to convert into Class A Visa shares subsequent to the settlement of certain litigation against Visa. The Class B shares have transfer restrictions, and the conversion rate into Class A shares is periodically adjusted as Visa settles litigation. The conversion rate at March 31, 2019 was approximately 1.63, which means the Company would receive approximately 20,140 Class A shares if the stock had converted on that date. This stock does not have a readily determinable fair value and is therefore carried at its cost basis of zero. If a readily determinable fair value becomes available for the Class B shares, or upon the conversion to Class A shares, the Company will adjust the carrying value of the stock to its market value with a credit to earnings.

On March 3, 2017, the Company acquired Carolina Bank (see Note 4 for more information). As a result of this acquisition, the Company recorded loans with a fair value of $497.5 million. Of those loans, $19.3 million were considered to be purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans, which are loans for which it is probable at acquisition date that all contractually required payments will not be collected. The remaining loans are considered to be purchased non-impaired loans and their related fair value discount or premium is being recognized as an adjustment to yield over the remaining life of each loan.

The following table relates to Carolina Bank PCI loans and summarizes the contractually required payments, which includes principal and interest, expected cash flows to be collected, and the fair value of acquired PCI loans at the acquisition date.

The following table relates to acquired Carolina Bank purchased non-impaired loans and provides the contractually required payments, fair value, and estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected at the acquisition date.

On October 1, 2017, the Company acquired Asheville Savings Bank (see Note 4 for more information). As a result of this acquisition, the Company recorded loans with a fair value of $606.2 million. Of those loans, $9.9 million were considered to be PCI loans. The remaining loans were considered to be purchased non-impaired loans and their related fair value discount or premium is being recognized as an adjustment to yield over the remaining life of each loan.

The following table relates to acquired Asheville Savings Bank PCI loans and summarizes the contractually required payments, which includes principal and interest, expected cash flows to be collected, and the fair value of acquired PCI loans at the acquisition date.

The following table relates to acquired Asheville Savings Bank purchased non-impaired loans and provides the contractually required payments, fair value, and estimate of contractual cash flows not expected to be collected at the acquisition date.

($ in thousands)	June 30, 2018					December 31, 2017					June 30, 2017					March 31, 2019				December 31, 2018				March 31, 2018
	Amount			Percentage		Amount			Percentage		Amount			Percentage		Amount		Percentage		Amount		Percentage		Amount			Percentage
All loans:

Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	417,366			10%	$	381,130			10%	$	383,834			11%	$	468,388		11%	$	457,037		11%	$	411,662			10%
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans		600,031			14%		539,020			13%		446,661			13%		553,760		13%		518,976		12%		542,960			13%
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		1,000,189			24%		972,772			24%		783,759			23%		1,061,049		25%		1,054,176		25%		995,662			24%
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit		369,875			9%		379,978			9%		320,953			10%		354,669		8%		359,162		8%		373,797			9%
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		1,690,175			41%		1,696,107			42%		1,384,569			41%		1,794,794		42%		1,787,022		42%		1,718,698			42%
Installment loans to individuals		71,823			2%		74,348			2%		57,008			2%		69,503		1%		71,392		2%		71,257			2%
Subtotal		4,149,459			100%		4,043,355			100%		3,376,784			100%		4,302,163		100%		4,247,765		100%		4,114,036			100%
Unamortized net deferred loan fees		(69	)				(986	)				(808	)
Unamortized net deferred loan costs (fees)																	1,624				1,299				(251	)
Total loans	$	4,149,390				$	4,042,369				$	3,375,976				$	4,303,787			$	4,249,064			$	4,113,785

At March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was a remaining unaccreted discount on the retained portion of sold SBA loans amounting to $6.2 million and $5.7 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was a remaining accretable discount of $14.1 million and $15.0 million, respectively, related to purchased non-impaired loans. Both types of discounts are amortized as yield adjustments over the respective lives of the loans, so long as the loans perform.

The following table presents changes in the ~~carrying value~~recorded investment of ~~PCI~~purchased credit impaired (“PCI”) loans.

($ in thousands) Purchased Credit Impaired Loans	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018			For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
($ in thousands) PCI loans							For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2019			For the Year Ended December 31, 2018			For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2018
Balance at beginning of period	$	23,165			514		$	17,393			23,165			23,165
Additions due to acquisition of Carolina Bank		—			19,254
Additions due to acquisition of Asheville Savings Bank		—			9,886
Change due to payments received and accretion		(2,328	)		(6,016	)		(1,556	)		(5,799	)		(1,023	)
Change due to loan charge-offs		(10	)		(12	)		(8	)		(10	)		—
Transfers to foreclosed real estate		—			(69	)		—			(4	)		—
Other		5			(392	)		38			41			5
Balance at end of period	$	20,832			23,165		$	15,867			17,393			22,147

($ in thousands) Accretable Yield for PCI loans	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018			For the Year Ended December 31, 2017			For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2019			For the Year Ended December 31, 2018			For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2018
Balance at beginning of period	$	4,688			—		$	4,750			4,688			4,688
Additions due to acquisition of Carolina Bank		—			3,617
Additions due to acquisition of Asheville Savings Bank		—			1,804
Accretion		(784	)		(1,846	)		(392	)		(2,050	)		(374	)
Reclassification from (to) nonaccretable difference		206			423			237			849			155
Other, net		48			690			550			1,263			(73	)
Balance at end of period	$	4,158			4,688		$	5,145			4,750			4,396

During the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2018,~~2019, the Company received ~~$190,000~~$133,000 in payments that exceeded the carrying amount of the related PCI loans, of which ~~$149,000~~$112,000 was recognized as loan discount accretion income and ~~$41,000~~$21,000 was recorded as additional loan interest income. During the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2017,~~2018, the Company received ~~$564,000~~$68,000 in payments that exceeded the carrying amount of the related PCI loans, all of which ~~$558,000~~ was recognized as loan discount accretion ~~income and $6,000 was recorded as additional loan interest~~ income.

Nonperforming assets are defined as nonaccrual loans, troubled debt restructured (“TDR”) loans, loans past due 90 or more days and still accruing interest, and foreclosed real estate. Nonperforming assets are summarized as follows.

($ in thousands)	June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		June 30, 2017		March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018		March 31, 2018

Nonperforming assets
Nonaccrual loans	$	25,494		20,968		22,795	$	20,684		22,575		21,849
Restructured loans - accruing		17,386		19,834		21,019
TDRs- accruing								12,457		13,418		18,495
Accruing loans > 90 days past due		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total nonperforming loans		42,880		40,802		43,814		33,141		35,993		40,344
Foreclosed real estate		8,296		12,571		11,196		6,390		7,440		11,307
Total nonperforming assets	$	51,176		53,373		55,010	$	39,531		43,433		51,651

Purchased credit impaired loans not included above (1)	$	20,832		23,165		16,846	$	15,867		17,393		22,147

(1) In the March 3, 2017 acquisition of Carolina Bank, and the October 1, 2017 acquisition of Asheville Savings Bank, the Company acquired $19.3 million and $9.9 million, respectively, in PCI loans in accordance with ASC 310-30 accounting guidance. These loans are excluded from nonperforming loans, including ~~$0.5~~$0.6 million, $0.6 million, and ~~$0.4~~$0.5 million in PCI loans at ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, and ~~June 30, 2017,~~March 31, 2018, respectively, that were contractually past due 90 days or more.

At ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company had ~~$0.4~~$1.5 million and ~~$0.8~~$0.7 million ~~respectively,~~ in residential mortgage loans in process of ~~foreclosure.~~foreclosure, respectively.

The following is a summary of the Company’s nonaccrual loans by major categories.

($ in thousands)	June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	3,407		1,001	$	980		919
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans		1,374		1,822		1,677		2,265
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		11,513		12,201		9,958		10,115
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit		1,765		2,524		1,632		1,685
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		7,292		3,345		6,280		7,452
Installment loans to individuals		143		75		157		139
Total	$	25,494		20,968	$	20,684		22,575

The following table presents an analysis of the payment status of the Company’s loans as of ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019.

($ in thousands)	Accruing 30-59 Days Past Due		Accruing 60-89 Days Past Due		Accruing 90 Days or More Past Due		Nonaccrual Loans		Accruing Current		Total Loans Receivable			Accruing 30-59 Days Past Due		Accruing 60-89 Days Past Due		Accruing 90 Days or More Past Due		Nonaccrual Loans		Accruing Current		Total Loans Receivable

Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	1,398		28		—		3,407		412,264		417,097		$	817		319		—		980		466,067		468,183
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans		913		276		—		1,374		597,143		599,706			369		93		—		1,677		551,446		553,585
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		4,708		692		—		11,513		975,883		992,796			6,480		485		—		9,958		1,038,072		1,054,995
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit		1,189		171		—		1,765		366,377		369,502			624		—		—		1,632		352,081		354,337
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		2,604		560		—		7,292		1,667,577		1,678,033			438		275		—		6,280		1,778,884		1,785,877
Installment loans to individuals		279		148		—		143		70,923		71,493			526		51		—		157		68,585		69,319
Purchased credit impaired		452		163		463		—		19,754		20,832			340		389		551		—		14,587		15,867
Total	$	11,543		2,038		463		25,494		4,109,921		4,149,459		$	9,594		1,612		551		20,684		4,269,722		4,302,163
Unamortized net deferred loan fees												(69	)
Unamortized net deferred loan costs																									1,624
Total loans											$	4,149,390												$	4,303,787

The following table presents an analysis of the payment status of the Company’s loans as of December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

($ in thousands)	Accruing 30-59 Days Past Due		Accruing 60-89 Days Past Due		Accruing 90 Days or More Past Due		Nonaccrual Loans		Accruing Current		Total Loans Receivable			Accruing 30-59 Days Past Due		Accruing 60-89 Days Past Due		Accruing 90 Days or More Past Due		Nonaccrual Loans		Accruing Current		Total Loans Receivable

Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	89		151		—		1,001		379,241		380,482		$	191		5		—		919		455,692		456,807
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans		1,154		214		—		1,822		535,423		538,613			849		212		—		2,265		515,472		518,798
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		6,777		1,370		—		12,201		943,565		963,913			14,178		1,369		—		10,115		1,022,261		1,047,923
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit		1,347		10		—		2,524		375,814		379,695			1,048		254		—		1,685		355,831		358,818
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		1,270		451		—		3,345		1,678,529		1,683,595			709		520		—		7,452		1,768,205		1,776,886
Installment loans to individuals		445		95		—		75		73,277		73,892			359		220		—		139		70,422		71,140
Purchased credit impaired		821		77		601		—		21,666		23,165			990		138		583		—		15,682		17,393
Total	$	11,903		2,368		601		20,968		4,007,515		4,043,355		$	18,324		2,718		583		22,575		4,203,565		4,247,765
Unamortized net deferred loan fees												(986	)
Unamortized net deferred loan costs																									1,299
Total loans											$	4,042,369												$	4,249,064

The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses for all loans for the three months ended March 31, 2019.

The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2018.

The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses for all loans for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2018.

($ in thousands)	Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural			Real Estate – Construction, Land Development & Other Land Loans			Real Estate – Residential (1-4 Family) First Mortgages			Real Estate – Mortgage – Home Equity Lines of Credit			Real Estate – Mortgage – Commercial and Other			Installment Loans to Individuals			Unallo -cated			Total				Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural			Real Estate – Construction, Land Development, & Other Land Loans			Real Estate – Residential (1-4 Family) First Mortgages			Real Estate – Mortgage – Home Equity Lines of Credit			Real Estate – Mortgage – Commercial and Other			Installment Loans to Individuals			Unallo -cated		Total

As of and for the three months ended June 30, 2018
As of and for the three months ended March 31, 2018																									As of and for the three months ended March 31, 2018
Beginning balance	$	2,536			2,317			5,892			2,266			5,991			844			3,452			23,298			$	3,111			2,816			6,147			1,827			6,475			950			1,972		23,298
Charge-offs		(370	)		(30	)		(172	)		(10	)		(271	)		(144	)		—			(997	)			(239	)		(2	)		(243	)		(176	)		(41	)		(118	)		—		(819	)
Recoveries		313			341			371			90			542			50			—			1,707				499			3,046			145			153			582			53			—		4,478
Provisions		(211	)		64			968			(96	)		1,033			147			(2,615	)		(710	)			(835	)		(3,543	)		(157	)		462			(1,025	)		(41	)		1,480		(3,659	)
Ending balance	$	2,268			2,692			7,059			2,250			7,295			897			837			23,298			$	2,536			2,317			5,892			2,266			5,991			844			3,452		23,298

As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2018

Beginning balance	$	3,111			2,816			6,147			1,827			6,475			950			1,972			23,298
Charge-offs		(609	)		(32	)		(415	)		(186	)		(312	)		(262	)		—			(1,816	)
Recoveries		812			3,387			516			243			1,124			103			—			6,185
Provisions		(1,046	)		(3,479	)		811			366			8			106			(1,135	)		(4,369	)
Ending balance	$	2,268			2,692			7,059			2,250			7,295			897			837			23,298

Ending balances as of June 30, 2018: Allowance for loan losses
Ending balances as of March 31, 2018: Allowance for loan losses																									Ending balances as of March 31, 2018: Allowance for loan losses
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	277			302			2,756			415			1,231			6			—			4,987			$	143			22			1,120			—			398			—			—		1,683
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	1,991			2,390			4,133			1,794			6,052			891			837			18,088			$	2,391			2,295			4,598			2,225			5,581			844			3,452		21,386
Purchased credit impaired	$	—			—			170			41			12			—			—			223			$	2			—			174			41			12			—			—		229

Loans receivable as of June 30, 2018:
Loans receivable as of March 31, 2018:																									Loans receivable as of March 31, 2018:
Ending balance – total	$	417,366			600,031			1,000,189			369,875			1,690,175			71,823			—			4,149,459			$	411,662			542,960			995,662			373,797			1,718,698			71,257			—		4,114,036
Unamortized net deferred loan fees																							(69	)																							(251	)
Total loans																						$	4,149,390																							$	4,113,785

Ending balances as of June 30, 2018: Loans
Ending balances as of March 31, 2018: Loans																									Ending balances as of March 31, 2018: Loans
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	3,208			3,549			15,247			671			10,333			10			—			33,018			$	433			3,242			13,783			23			9,063			—			—		26,544
Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	413,889			596,157			977,549			368,831			1,667,700			71,483			—			4,095,609			$	410,816			539,317			973,550			373,501			1,697,319			70,842			—		4,065,345
Purchased credit impaired	$	269			325			7,393			373			12,142			330			—			20,832			$	413			401			8,329			273			12,316			415			—		22,147

~~The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2017.~~

~~The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses for all loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.~~

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans, excluding PCI loans, as of ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019.

($ in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment
Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded:

Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	2,530		2,580		—		928	$	28		29		—		169
Real estate – mortgage – construction, land development & other land loans		2,948		3,429		—		2,901		458		782		—		472
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		4,514		5,118		—		4,885		4,789		5,112		—		4,708
Real estate – mortgage –home equity loans / lines of credit		23		35		—		138		21		30		—		21
Real estate – mortgage –commercial and other		3,494		3,685		—		3,441		4,016		4,808		—		3,745
Installment loans to individuals		—		3		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total impaired loans with no allowance	$	13,509		14,850		—		12,293	$	9,312		10,761		—		9,115


Impaired loans with an allowance recorded:

Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	678		708		277		479	$	1,016		1,016		857		701
Real estate – mortgage – construction, land development & other land loans		601		723		302		355		339		339		28		599
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		10,733		11,347		2,756		9,724		6,102		6,303		858		6,934
Real estate – mortgage –home equity loans / lines of credit		648		776		415		216		—		—		—		137
Real estate – mortgage –commercial and other		6,839		6,942		1,231		5,856		4,380		4,998		312		5,215
Installment loans to individuals		10		15		6		3		—		—		—		—
Total impaired loans with allowance	$	19,509		20,511		4,987		16,633	$	11,837		12,655		2,055		13,586

Interest income recorded on impaired loans during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 was insignificant.

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans, excluding PCI loans, as of December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

($ in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment
Impaired loans with no related allowance recorded:

Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	183		425		—		276	$	310		310		—		957
Real estate – mortgage – construction, land development & other land loans		2,743		3,941		—		2,846		485		803		—		2,366
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		5,205		5,728		—		7,067		4,626		4,948		—		4,804
Real estate – mortgage –home equity loans / lines of credit		368		387		—		129		22		31		—		91
Real estate – mortgage –commercial and other		3,066		3,321		—		3,143		3,475		4,237		—		3,670
Installment loans to individuals		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total impaired loans with no allowance	$	11,565		13,802		—		13,461	$	8,918		10,329		—		11,888


Impaired loans with an allowance recorded:

Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	396		396		215		214	$	386		387		226		422
Real estate – mortgage – construction, land development & other land loans		232		241		18		503		860		864		134		385
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		9,595		9,829		1,099		10,077		7,765		7,904		955		8,963
Real estate – mortgage –home equity loans / lines of credit		—		—		—		66		274		275		48		184
Real estate – mortgage –commercial and other		5,427		5,427		232		5,369		6,050		6,054		906		5,911
Installment loans to individuals		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		2
Total impaired loans with allowance	$	15,650		15,893		1,564		16,229	$	15,335		15,484		2,269		15,867

Interest income recorded on impaired loans during the year ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 was insignificant. Interest income recorded on impaired loans during the three months ended March 31, 2018 was insignificant.

The Company tracks credit quality based on its internal risk ratings. Upon origination, a loan is assigned an initial risk grade, which is generally based on several factors such as the borrower’s credit score, the loan-to-value ratio, the debt-to-income ratio, etc. Loans that are risk-graded as substandard during the origination process are declined. After loans are initially graded, they are monitored regularly for credit quality based on many factors, such as payment history, the borrower’s financial status, and changes in collateral value. Loans can be downgraded or upgraded depending on management’s evaluation of these factors. Internal risk-grading policies are consistent throughout each loan type.

The following describes the Company’s internal risk grades in ascending order of likelihood of loss:

The following table presents the Company’s recorded investment in loans by credit quality indicators as of ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019.

($ in thousands)
	Pass		Special Mention Loans		Classified Accruing Loans		Classified Nonaccrual Loans		Total			Pass		Special Mention Loans		Classified Accruing Loans		Classified Nonaccrual Loans		Total

Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	410,434		2,322		934		3,407		417,097		$	460,963		4,667		1,573		980		468,183
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans		586,310		6,812		5,210		1,374		599,706			544,496		5,960		1,452		1,677		553,585
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		941,399		13,829		26,055		11,513		992,796			1,009,860		16,271		18,905		9,958		1,054,994
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit		357,507		1,698		8,532		1,765		369,502			345,187		1,466		6,052		1,632		354,337
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		1,648,367		16,644		5,730		7,292		1,678,033			1,752,757		18,664		8,177		6,280		1,785,878
Installment loans to individuals		70,776		215		359		143		71,493			68,606		227		329		157		69,319
Purchased credit impaired		6,376		7,059		7,397		—		20,832			8,148		4,025		3,694		—		15,867
Total	$	4,021,169		48,579		54,217		25,494		4,149,459		$	4,190,017		51,280		40,182		20,684		4,302,163
Unamortized net deferred loan fees										(69	)
Unamortized net deferred loan costs																					1,624
Total loans										4,149,390											4,303,787

The following table presents the Company’s recorded investment in loans by credit quality indicators as of December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

($ in thousands)
	Pass		Special Mention Loans		Classified Accruing Loans		Classified Nonaccrual Loans		Total			Pass		Special Mention Loans		Classified Accruing Loans		Classified Nonaccrual Loans		Total

Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	368,658		9,901		922		1,001		380,482		$	452,372		3,056		459		919		456,806
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans		523,642		7,129		6,020		1,822		538,613			509,251		5,668		1,614		2,265		518,798
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		905,111		16,235		30,366		12,201		963,913			1,004,458		12,238		21,113		10,115		1,047,924
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit		365,982		3,784		7,405		2,524		379,695			348,792		1,688		6,653		1,685		358,818
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		1,647,725		23,335		9,190		3,345		1,683,595			1,750,810		14,484		4,140		7,452		1,776,886
Installment loans to individuals		73,379		222		216		75		73,892			70,357		231		413		139		71,140
Purchased credit impaired		6,541		12,309		4,315		—		23,165			8,355		5,214		3,824		—		17,393
Total	$	3,891,038		72,915		58,434		20,968		4,043,355		$	4,144,395		42,579		38,216		22,575		4,247,765
Unamortized net deferred loan fees										(986	)
Unamortized net deferred loan costs																					1,299
Total loans										4,042,369											4,249,064

The restructuring of a loan is considered a “troubled debt restructuring” ~~(“TDR”)~~ if both (i) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties and (ii) the creditor has granted a concession. Concessions may include interest rate reductions or below market interest rates, principal forgiveness, restructuring amortization schedules and other actions intended to minimize potential losses.

The vast majority of the Company’s troubled debt restructurings ~~modified related~~are due to interest rate reductions combined with restructured amortization schedules. The Company does not generally grant principal forgiveness.

All loans classified as troubled debt restructurings are considered to be impaired and are evaluated as such for determination of the allowance for loan losses. The Company’s troubled debt restructurings can be classified as either nonaccrual or accruing based on the loan’s payment status. The troubled debt restructurings that are nonaccrual are reported within the nonaccrual loan totals presented previously.

The following table presents information related to loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 and ~~2017.~~2018.

~~The following table presents information related to loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.~~

($ in thousands)	For six months ended June 30, 2018						For the six months ended June 30, 2017						For three months ended March 31, 2019						For the three months ended March 31, 2018
	Number of Contracts		Pre- Modification Restructured Balances		Post- Modification Restructured Balances		Number of Contracts		Pre- Modification Restructured Balances		Post- Modification Restructured Balances		Number of Contracts		Pre- Modification Restructured Balances		Post- Modification Restructured Balances		Number of Contracts		Pre- Modification Restructured Balances		Post- Modification Restructured Balances
TDRs – Accruing
Commercial, financial, and agricultural		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		1		18		18		—		—		—		1		55		55		—		—		—
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		—		—		—		5		3,550		3,525		—		—		—		—		—		—
Installment loans to individuals		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—

TDRs – Nonaccrual
Commercial, financial, and agricultural		—		—		—		1		38		25		—		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans		1		61		61		1		32		32		—		—		—		1		61		61
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		2		254		264		1		215		215		—		—		—		2		254		264
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Installment loans to individuals		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total TDRs arising during period		4	$	333	$	343		8	$	3,835	$	3,797		1	$	55	$	55		3	$	315	$	325

Accruing restructured loans that were modified in the previous 12 months and that defaulted during the three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018 ~~and 2017~~ are presented in the table below. The Company considers a loan to have defaulted when it becomes 90 or more days delinquent under the modified terms, has been transferred to nonaccrual status, or has been transferred to foreclosed real estate.

($ in thousands)	For the three months ended June 30, 2018				For the three months ended June 30, 2017				For the three months ended March 31, 2019				For the three months ended March 31, 2018
	Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment

Accruing TDRs that subsequently defaulted
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family first mortgages)		1	$	60		1	$	254		1	$	93		—	$	—
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		2		763		—		—		—		—		1		570

Total accruing TDRs that subsequently defaulted		3	$	823		1	$	254		1	$	93		1	$	570

~~Accruing restructured loans that were modified in the previous 12 months and that defaulted during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 are presented in the table below~~

The amount of loans shown on the consolidated balance sheets includes net deferred loan (fees) costs of approximately ($69,000), ($986,000), and ($808,000) at June 30, 2018, December 31, 2017, and June 30, 2017, respectively.

The following is a summary of the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of amortizable intangible assets as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, and ~~June 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 and the carrying amount of unamortized intangible assets as of those same dates.

	June 30, 2018				December 31, 2017				June 30, 2017				March 31, 2019				December 31, 2018				March 31, 2018
($ in thousands)	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Amortizable intangible assets:
Customer lists	$	6,013		1,322		6,013		1,090		2,369		866	$	6,013		1,774		6,013		1,637		6,013		1,185
Core deposit intangibles		28,440		14,078		28,280		11,475		18,520		9,404		28,440		17,585		28,440		16,469		28,440		12,803
SBA servicing asset		4,166		558		2,194		207		928		66		6,072		1,352		5,472		1,053		3,348		319
Other		1,303		812		1,303		581		1,032		381		1,303		1,036		1,303		957		1,303		718
Total	$	39,922		16,770		37,790		13,353		22,849		10,717	$	41,828		21,747		41,228		20,116		39,104		15,025

Unamortizable intangible
assets:
Goodwill	$	232,458				233,070				139,124			$	234,368				234,368				231,681

~~In addition to the above acquisition related activity, the~~The Company recorded ~~$1,972,000~~$600,000 and ~~$513,000~~$1,154,000 in servicing assets associated with the guaranteed portion of SBA loans originated and sold during the first ~~six months~~quarters of ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. During the first ~~six months~~quarters of ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, the Company recorded ~~$351,000~~$299,000 and ~~$66,000,~~$112,000, respectively, in related amortization expense. Servicing assets are recorded for loans, or portions thereof, that the Company has sold but continue to service for a fee. Servicing assets are recorded at fair value and amortized over the expected ~~life~~lives of the related ~~loans.~~loans and are tested for impairment on a quarterly basis. SBA servicing asset amortization expense is recorded within noninterest income to offset SBA servicing fees.

Amortization expense of all other intangible assets totaled ~~$1,745,000~~$1,332,000 and ~~$1,031,000~~$1,560,000 for the three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017, respectively, and $3,417,000 and $1,607,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017,~~ respectively.

The following table presents the estimated amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets for the last ~~two~~three quarters of calendar year ~~2018~~2019 and for each of the four calendar years ending December 31, ~~2022~~2023 and the estimated amount amortizable thereafter. These estimates are subject to change in future periods to the extent management determines it is necessary to make adjustments to the carrying value or estimated useful lives of amortized intangible assets.

($ in thousands)	Estimated Amortization Expense		Estimated Amortization Expense
July 1 to December 31, 2018	$	3,164
2019		5,440
April 1 to December 31, 2019			$	4,191
2020		4,370		4,641
2021		3,288		3,628
2022		2,312		2,525
2023				1,453
Thereafter		4,578		3,643
Total	$	23,152	$	20,081

The Company has historically sponsored two defined benefit pension plans – a qualified retirement plan (the “Pension Plan”) which was generally available to all employees, and a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”), which was for the benefit of certain senior management executives of the Company. Effective December 31, 2012, the Company froze both plans for all participants. Although no previously accrued benefits were lost, employees no longer accrue benefits for service subsequent to 2012.

The Company recorded periodic pension cost ~~(income)~~ totaling ~~($93,000)~~$244,000 and ~~($241,000)~~$365,000 for the three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017, respectively, which primarily related to investment income from the Pension Plan’s assets. The following table contains the components of the pension cost (income).~~

~~The Company recorded pension cost (income) totaling $272,000 and $(403,000) for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017,~~ respectively. The following table contains the components of the pension ~~cost (income).~~cost.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,																		For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017			2018			2017			2018 Total			2017 Total			2019			2018			2019		2018			2019 Total			2018 Total
($ in thousands)	Pension Plan			Pension Plan			SERP			SERP			Both Plans			Both Plans			Pension Plan			Pension Plan			SERP		SERP			Both Plans			Both Plans
Service cost	$	—			—			62			59			62			59		$	—			—			—		29			—			29
Interest cost		656			725			110			113			766			838			372			330			41		57			413			387
Expected return on plan assets		(659	)		(1,405	)		—			—			(659	)		(1,405	)		(397	)		(103	)		—		—			(397	)		(103	)
Amortization of net (gain)/loss		119			122			(16	)		(17	)		103			105			223			60			5		(8	)		228			52
Net periodic pension cost (income)	$	116			(558	)		156			155			272			(403	)
Net periodic pension cost																			$	198			287			46		78			244			365

The service cost component of net periodic pension cost ~~(income)~~ is included in salaries and benefits expense and all other components of net periodic pension cost ~~(income)~~ are included in other noninterest expense.

The Company’s contributions to the Pension Plan are based on computations by independent actuarial consultants and are intended to be deductible for income tax purposes. The Company did not contribute to the Pension Plan in the first quarter 2019 and does not expect to contribute to the Pension Plan in ~~2018.~~2019.

The Company’s funding policy with respect to the SERP is to fund the related benefits from the operating cash flow of the Company.

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity during a period for non-owner transactions and is divided into net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss). Other comprehensive income (loss) includes revenues, expenses, gains, and losses that are excluded from earnings under current accounting standards. The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the Company are as follows:

($ in thousands)	June 30, 2018			December 31, 2017			June 30, 2017			March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018			March 31, 2018
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale	$	(11,513	)		(2,211	)		252		$	(6,487	)		(12,390	)		(9,501	)
Deferred tax asset (liability)		2,691			517			(93	)		1,516			2,896			2,220
Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale		(8,822	)		(1,694	)		159			(4,971	)		(9,494	)		(7,281	)

Additional pension asset (liability)		(3,097	)		(3,200	)		(4,907	)		(2,992	)		(3,220	)		(3,148	)
Deferred tax asset (liability)		724			748			1,816			699			753			736
Net additional pension asset (liability)		(2,373	)		(2,452	)		(3,091	)		(2,293	)		(2,467	)		(2,412	)

Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(11,195	)		(4,146	)		(2,932	)	$	(7,264	)		(11,961	)		(9,693	)

~~The following table discloses the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2018 (all amounts are net of tax).~~

The following table discloses the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2017~~March 31, 2019 (all amounts are net of tax).

($ in thousands)	Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale			Additional Pension Asset (Liability)			Total			Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Securities Available for Sale			Additional Pension Asset (Liability)			Total
Beginning balance at January 1, 2017	$	(1,947	)		(3,160	)		(5,107	)
Beginning balance at January 1, 2019										$	(9,494	)		(2,467	)		(11,961	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications		1,958			—			1,958			4,523			—			4,523
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income		148			69			217			—			174			174
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)		2,106			69			2,175			4,523			174			4,697

Ending balance at June 30, 2017	$	159			(3,091	)		(2,932	)
Ending balance at March 31, 2019										$	(4,971	)		(2,293	)		(7,264	)

The following table discloses the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three months ended March 31, 2018 (all amounts are net of tax).

Relevant accounting guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The guidance describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) of identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial instruments that were measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis at ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019.

($ in thousands)
Description of Financial Instruments	Fair Value at June 30, 2018		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value at March 31, 2019		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Recurring
Securities available for sale:
Government-sponsored enterprise securities	$	18,537		—		18,537		—	$	78,887		—		78,887		—
Mortgage-backed securities		282,287		—		282,287		—		526,948		—		526,948		—
Corporate bonds		33,244		—		33,244		—		33,774		—		33,774		—
Total available for sale securities	$	334,068		—		334,068		—	$	639,609		—		639,609		—

Nonrecurring
Impaired loans	$	14,586		—		—		14,586	$	10,820		—		—		10,820
Foreclosed real estate		8,296		—		—		8,296		6,390		—		—		6,390

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial instruments that were measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

($ in thousands)
Description of Financial Instruments	Fair Value at December 31, 2017		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value at December 31, 2018		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Recurring
Securities available for sale:
Government-sponsored enterprise securities	$	13,867		—		13,867		—	$	82,662		—		82,662		—
Mortgage-backed securities		295,213		—		295,213		—		385,551		—		385,551		—
Corporate bonds		34,190		—		34,190		—		33,138		—		33,138		—
Total available for sale securities	$	343,270		—		343,270		—	$	501,351		—		501,351		—

Nonrecurring
Impaired loans	$	14,086		—		—		14,086	$	13,071		—		—		13,071
Foreclosed real estate		12,571		—		—		12,571		7,440		—		—		7,440

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value.

Securities Available for Sale — When quoted market prices are available in an active market, the securities are classified as Level 1 in the valuation hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available, but fair values can be estimated by observing quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, the securities are classified as Level 2 on the valuation hierarchy. Most of the fair values for the Company’s Level 2 securities are determined by our third-party bond accounting provider using matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. For the Company, Level 2 securities include mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage obligations, government-sponsored enterprise securities, and corporate bonds. In cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.

The Company reviews the pricing methodologies utilized by the bond accounting provider to ensure the fair value determination is consistent with the applicable accounting guidance and that the investments are properly classified in the fair value hierarchy. Further, the Company validates the fair values for a sample of securities in the portfolio by comparing the fair values provided by the bond accounting provider to prices from other independent sources for the same or similar securities. The Company analyzes unusual or significant variances and conducts additional research with the portfolio manager, if necessary, and takes appropriate action based on its findings.

Impaired loans — Fair values for impaired loans in the above table are measured on a non-recurring basis and are based on the underlying collateral values securing the loans, adjusted for estimated selling costs, or the net present value of the cash flows expected to be received for such loans. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the collateral is real estate. The value of real estate collateral is determined using an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed third party appraiser (Level 3). The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable borrower’s financial statements if not considered significant. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivable collateral are based on borrower financial statement balances or aging reports on a discounted basis as appropriate (Level 3). Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Foreclosed real estate – Foreclosed real estate, consisting of properties obtained through foreclosure or in satisfaction of loans, is reported at the lower of cost or fair value. Fair value is measured on a non-recurring basis and is based upon independent market prices or current appraisals that are generally prepared using an income or market valuation approach and conducted by an independent, licensed third party appraiser, adjusted for estimated selling costs (Level 3). At the time of foreclosure, any excess of the loan balance over the fair value of the real estate held as collateral is treated as a charge against the allowance for loan losses. For any real estate valuations subsequent to foreclosure, any excess of the real estate recorded value over the fair value of the real estate is treated as a foreclosed real estate write-down on the Consolidated Statements of Income.

For Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis as of ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements were as follows:

For Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis as of December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements were as follows:

Transfers of assets or liabilities between levels within the fair value hierarchy are recognized when an event or change in circumstances occurs. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for assets or liabilities measured on a recurring basis during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 or ~~2017.~~2018.

For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ the increase (decrease) in the fair value of securities available for sale was ~~($9,302,000)~~$5,903,000 and ~~$3,102,000,~~($7,290,000), respectively, which is included in other comprehensive income (net of tax benefit (expense) of ~~$2,174,000~~($1,380,000) and ~~($1,144,000),~~$1,703,000, respectively). Fair value measurement methods at ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018 ~~and 2017~~ are consistent with those used in prior reporting periods.

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 are as follows:

		June 30, 2018				December 31, 2017					March 31, 2019				December 31, 2018
($ in thousands)	Level in Fair Value Hierarchy	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Level in Fair Value Hierarchy	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value

Cash and due from banks, noninterest-bearing	Level 1	$	97,163		97,163		114,301		114,301	Level 1	$	80,620		80,620		56,050		56,050
Due from banks, interest-bearing	Level 1		462,972		462,972		375,189		375,189	Level 1		366,187		366,187		406,848		406,848
Securities available for sale	Level 2		334,068		334,068		343,270		343,270	Level 2		639,609		639,609		501,351		501,351
Securities held to maturity	Level 2		108,265		107,068		118,503		118,998	Level 2		90,903		90,280		101,237		99,906
Presold mortgages in process of settlement	Level 1		9,311		9,311		12,459		12,459	Level 1		3,318		3,318		4,279		4,279
Total loans, net of allowance	Level 3		4,126,092		4,084,898		4,019,071		4,010,551	Level 3		4,282,692		4,228,688		4,228,025		4,181,139
Accrued interest receivable	Level 1		13,930		13,930		14,094		14,094	Level 1		16,516		16,516		16,004		16,004
Bank-owned life insurance	Level 1		100,413		100,413		99,162		99,162	Level 1		102,524		102,524		101,878		101,878
SBA Servicing Asset										Level 3		4,720		4,990		4,419		4,617

Deposits	Level 2		4,553,621		4,547,235		4,406,955		4,401,757	Level 2		4,797,238		4,792,368		4,659,339		4,653,522
Borrowings	Level 2		407,076		398,113		407,543		397,903	Level 2		406,125		401,064		406,609		402,556
Accrued interest payable	Level 2		1,651		1,651		1,235		1,235	Level 2		2,341		2,341		1,976		1,972

~~Fair value methods and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments.~~

~~Cash and Amounts Due from Banks, Presold Mortgages in Process of Settlement, Accrued Interest Receivable, and Accrued Interest Payable~~-~~The carrying amounts approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of these financial instruments.~~Page 29

~~Available for Sale and Held to Maturity Securities~~-Fair values are provided by a third-party and are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments or matrix pricing.

~~Loans~~-For nonimpaired loans, fair values are determined assuming the sale of the notes to a third-party financial investor. Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, financial and agricultural, real estate construction, real estate mortgages and installment loans to individuals. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and variable interest rate terms. The fair value for each category is determined by discounting scheduled future cash flows using current interest rates with a liquidity discount offered on loans with similar risk characteristics, and includes the Company’s estimate of future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. Fair values for impaired loans are primarily based on estimated proceeds expected upon liquidation of the collateral or the present value of expected cash flows.

~~Bank-Owned Life Insurance – The carrying value of life insurance approximates fair value because this investment is carried at cash surrender value, as determined by the issuer.~~

~~Deposits~~-The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing checking accounts, savings accounts, interest-bearing checking accounts, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand as of the valuation date. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered in the marketplace for deposits of similar remaining maturities.

~~Borrowings~~-The fair value of borrowings is based on the discounted value of the contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using the rates currently offered by the Company’s lenders for debt of similar maturities.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no highly liquid market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.

Fair value estimates are based on existing on- and off-balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. Significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial assets or liabilities include net premises and equipment, intangible and other assets such as deferred income taxes, prepaid expense accounts, income taxes currently payable and other various accrued expenses. In addition, the income tax ramifications related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair value estimates and have not been considered in any of the estimates.

All of the Company’s revenues that are in the scope of the “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” accounting standard (“~~ASC~~Topic 606”) are recognized within noninterest income. The following table presents the Company’s sources of noninterest income for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June, 2018~~March 31, 2019 and ~~2017.~~2018. Items outside the scope of ~~ASC~~Topic 606 are noted as such.

	For the Six Months Ended						For the Three Months Ended
$ in thousands	June 30, 2018			June 30, 2017			March 31, 2019			March 31, 2018

Service charges on deposit accounts	$	6,385			5,580
Noninterest Income
In-scope of Topic 606:
Service charges on deposit accounts:							$	2,945			3,263
Other service charges, commissions, and fees:
Interchange income		6,543			4,697			3,551			3,061
Other fees		2,967			2,030
Fees from presold mortgage loans (1)		1,655			2,279
Other service charges and fees								1,697			1,424
Commissions from sales of insurance and financial products:
Insurance income		2,903			858			1,368			1,414
Wealth management income		1,156			1,020			661			526
SBA consulting fees		2,267			2,310			1,263			1,141
SBA loan sale gains (1)		6,400			1,549
Bank-owned life insurance income (1)		1,251			1,088
Foreclosed property gains (losses), net		(387	)		(223	)		(245	)		(288	)
Securities gains (losses), net (1)		—			(235	)
Other gains (losses), net (1)		912			731
Noninterest income (in-scope of Topic 606)								11,240			10,541
Noninterest income (out-of-scope of Topic 606)								3,335			5,288
Total noninterest income	$	32,052			21,684		$	14,575			15,829

(1) Not within the scope of ASC 606.

A description of the Company’s revenue streams accounted for under ~~ASC~~Topic 606 is detailed below.

Service Charges on Deposit Accounts: The Company earns fees from its deposit customers for transaction-based, account maintenance, and overdraft services. Overdraft fees are recognized at the point in time that the overdraft occurs. Maintenance and activity fees include account maintenance fees and transaction-based fees. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to monthly maintenance, are earned over the course of the month, representing the period over which the Company satisfies the performance obligation. Transaction-based fees, which include services such as ATM use fees, stop payment charges, statement rendering, are recognized at the time the transaction is executed as that is the point in time the Company fulfills the customer’s request. Service charges on deposits are withdrawn from the customer’s account balance.

Other service charges, commissions, and fees: The Company earns interchange income on its customers’ debit and credit card usage and earns fees from other services utilized by its customers. Interchange income is primarily comprised of interchange fees earned whenever the Company’s debit and credit cards are processed through card payment networks such as ~~Mastercard.~~MasterCard. Interchange fees from cardholder transactions represent a percentage of the underlying transaction value and are recognized daily, concurrently with the transaction processing services provided to the cardholder. Other service charges include revenue from processing wire transfers, bill pay service, cashier’s checks, ATM surcharge fees, and other services. The Company’s performance obligation for fees, exchange, and other service charges are largely satisfied, and related revenue recognized, when the services are rendered or upon completion. Payment is typically received immediately or in the following month.

Commissions from the sale of insurance and financial products: The Company earns commissions from the sale of insurance policies and wealth management products.

Insurance income generally consists of commissions from the sale of insurance policies and performance-based commissions from insurance companies. The Company recognizes commission income from the sale of insurance policies when it acts as an agent between the insurance company and the policyholder. The Company’s performance obligation is generally satisfied upon the issuance of the insurance policy. Shortly after the policy is issued, the carrier remits the commission payment to the Company, and the Company recognizes the revenue. Performance-based commissions from insurance companies are recognized at a point in time as policies are sold.

Wealth Management Income primarily consists of commissions received on financial product sales, such as annuities. The Company’s performance obligation is generally satisfied upon the issuance of the financial product. Shortly after the policy is issued, the carrier remits the commission payment to the Company, and the Company recognizes the revenue. The Company also earns some fees from asset management, which is billed quarterly for services rendered in the most recent ~~period, for which the performance obligation has been satisfied.~~period.

SBA Consulting fees: The Company earns fees for its consulting services related to the origination of SBA loans. Fees are based on a percentage of the dollar amount of the originated loans and are recorded when the performance obligation has been ~~satisfied.~~satisfied, upon closing the loan.

Foreclosed property gains (losses), net: The Company records a gain or loss from the sale of foreclosed property when control of the property transfers to the buyer, which generally occurs at the time of an executed deed. When the Company finances the sale of foreclosed property to the buyer, the Company assesses whether the buyer is committed to perform their obligations under the contract and whether collectability of the transaction price is probable. Once these criteria are met, the foreclosed property asset is derecognized and the gain or loss on sale is recorded upon the transfer of control of the property to the buyer.

The Company has made no significant judgments in applying the revenue guidance prescribed in ASC 606 that affect the determination of the amount and timing of revenue from the above-described contracts with customers.

Effective January 1, 2019, the Company adopted new accounting guidance regardingLeases(Topic 842). As of March 31, 2019, the Company leased eight branch offices for which the land and buildings are leased and nine branch offices for which the land is leased but the building is owned. The Company also leases one loan production office and office space for several operational departments. All of the Company’s leases have historically qualified as operating leases under prior accounting guidance, and therefore, were not previously recognized on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The lease agreements have maturity dates ranging from January 2021 through May 2076, some of which include options for multiple five- and ten-year extensions. The weighted average remaining life of the lease term for these leases was 21.19 years as of March 31, 2019.

The discount rate that was determined for each lease was based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rate at lease inception, on a collateralized basis, over a similar term. For operating leases existing prior to January 1, 2019, the rate for the remaining lease term as of January 1, 2019 was used. The weighted average discount rate for leases was 3.42% as of March 31, 2019.

Total operating lease expense was $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. The right-of-use assets, included in premises and equipment, and lease liabilities, included in other liabilities, were $18.9 million and $19.0 million as of March 31, 2019, respectively.

Estimated lease payments for the Company’s operating leases with initial terms of one year or more as of March 31, 2019 were as follows.

Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Results of Operations and Financial Condition

The accounting principles we follow and our methods of applying these principles conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and with general practices followed by the banking industry. Certain of these principles involve a significant amount of judgment and may involve the use of estimates based on our best assumptions at the time of the estimation. The allowance for loan losses, intangible assets, and the fair value and discount accretion of acquired loans are three policies we have identified as being more sensitive in terms of judgments and estimates, taking into account their overall potential impact to our consolidated financial statements.

Due to the estimation process and the potential materiality of the amounts involved, we have identified the accounting for the allowance for loan losses and the related provision for loan losses as an accounting policy critical to our consolidated financial statements. The provision for loan losses charged to operations is an amount sufficient to bring the allowance for loan losses to an estimated balance considered adequate to absorb losses inherent in the portfolio.

Our determination of the adequacy of the allowance is based primarily on a mathematical model that estimates the appropriate allowance for loan losses. This model has two components. The first component involves the estimation of losses on individually evaluated “impaired loans.” A loan is considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the original loan agreement. A loan is specifically evaluated for an appropriate valuation allowance if the loan balance is above a prescribed evaluation threshold (which varies based on credit quality, accruing status, troubled debt restructured status, purchased credit impaired status, and type of collateral) and the loan is determined to be impaired. The estimated valuation allowance is the difference, if any, between the loan balance outstanding and the value of the impaired loan as determined by either 1) an estimate of the cash flows that we expect to receive from the borrower discounted at the loan’s effective rate, or 2) in the case of a collateral-dependent loan, the fair value of the collateral.

The second component of the allowance model is an estimate of losses for all loans not considered to be impaired loans (“general reserve loans”). General reserve loans are segregated into pools by loan type and risk grade and estimated loss percentages are assigned to each loan pool based on historical losses. The historical loss percentages are then adjusted for any environmental factors used to reflect changes in the collectability of the portfolio not captured by historical data.

The reserves estimated for individually evaluated impaired loans are then added to the reserve estimated for general reserve loans. This becomes our “allocated allowance.” The allocated allowance is compared to the actual allowance for loan losses recorded on our books and any adjustment necessary for the recorded allowance to absorb losses inherent in the portfolio is recorded as a provision for loan losses. The provision for loan losses is a direct charge to earnings in the period recorded. Any remaining difference between the allocated allowance and the actual allowance for loan losses recorded on our books is our “unallocated allowance.”

Purchased loans are recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. Therefore, amounts deemed uncollectible at the acquisition date represent a discount to the loan value and become a part of the fair value calculation. Subsequent decreases in the amount expected to be collected result in a provision for loan losses with a corresponding increase in the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent increases in the amount expected to be collected are accreted into income over the life of the loan and this accretion is referred to as “loan discount accretion.”

Within the purchased loan portfolio, loans are deemed purchased credit impaired at acquisition if the bank believes it will not be able to collect all contractual cash flows. Performing loans with an unamortized discount or premium that are not deemed purchased credit impaired are considered to be purchased performing loans. Purchased credit impaired loans are individually evaluated as impaired loans, as described above, while purchased performing loans are evaluated as general reserve loans. For purchased performing loan pools, any computed allowance that is in excess of remaining net discounts is a component of the allocated allowance.

Although we use the best information available to make evaluations, future material adjustments may be necessary if economic, operational, or other conditions change. In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require us to recognize additions to the allowance based on the examiners’ judgment about information available to them at the time of their examinations.

For further discussion, see “Nonperforming Assets” and “Summary of Loan Loss Experience” below.

Due to the estimation process and the potential materiality of the amounts involved, we have also identified the accounting for intangible assets as an accounting policy critical to our consolidated financial statements.

When we complete an acquisition transaction, the excess of the purchase price over the amount by which the fair market value of assets acquired exceeds the fair market value of liabilities assumed represents an intangible asset. We must then determine the identifiable portions of the intangible asset, with any remaining amount classified as goodwill. Identifiable intangible assets associated with these acquisitions are generally amortized over the estimated life of the related asset, whereas goodwill is tested annually for impairment, but not systematically amortized. Assuming no goodwill impairment, it is beneficial to our future earnings to have a lower amount assigned to identifiable intangible assets and higher amount of goodwill as opposed to having a higher amount considered to be identifiable intangible assets and a lower amount classified as goodwill.

The primary identifiable intangible asset we typically record in connection with a whole bank or bank branch acquisition is the value of the core deposit intangible, whereas when we acquire an insurance agency or a consulting firm, as we did in 2016 and 2017, the primary identifiable intangible asset is the value of the acquired customer list. Determining the amount of identifiable intangible assets and their average lives involves multiple assumptions and estimates and is typically determined by performing a discounted cash flow analysis, which involves a combination of any or all of the following assumptions: customer attrition/runoff, alternative funding costs, deposit servicing costs, and discount rates. We typically engage a third party consultant to assist in each analysis. For the whole bank and bank branch transactions recorded to date, the core deposit intangibles have generally been estimated to have a life ranging from seven to ten years, with an accelerated rate of amortization. For insurance agency acquisitions, the identifiable intangible assets related to the customer lists were determined to have a life of ten to fifteen years, with amortization occurring on a straight-line basis. For SBA Complete, the ~~SBA~~ consulting firm we acquired in 2016, the identifiable intangible asset related to the customer list was determined to have a life of approximately seven years, with amortization occurring on a straight-line basis.

Subsequent to the initial recording of the identifiable intangible assets and goodwill, we amortize the identifiable intangible assets over their estimated average lives, as discussed above. In addition, on at least an annual basis, goodwill is evaluated for impairment by comparing the fair value of our reporting units to their related carrying value, including goodwill. We have three reporting units – 1) First Bank with ~~$220.8~~$222.7 million in goodwill, 2) First Bank Insurance with $7.4 million in goodwill, and 3) SBA activities, including SBA Complete and our SBA ~~lending division,~~Lending Division, with $4.3 million in goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit were ever to exceed its fair value, we would determine whether the implied fair value of the goodwill, using a discounted cash flow analysis, exceeded the carrying value of the goodwill. If the carrying value of the goodwill exceeded the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment loss would be recorded in an amount equal to that excess. Performing such a discounted cash flow analysis would involve the significant use of estimates and assumptions.

In our ~~2017~~October 31, 2018 goodwill impairment evaluation, we concluded that the goodwill for each of our reporting units was not impaired.

We review identifiable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Our policy is that an impairment loss is recognized, equal to the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and its fair value, if the sum of the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. Estimating future cash flows involves the use of multiple estimates and assumptions, such as those listed above.

We consider the determination of the initial fair value of acquired loans and the subsequent discount accretion of the purchased loans to involve a high degree of judgment and complexity.

We determine fair value accounting estimates of newly assumed assets and liabilities in accordance with relevant accounting guidance. However, the amount that we realize on these assets could differ materially from the carrying value reflected in our financial statements, based upon the timing of collections on the acquired loans in future periods. Because of inherent credit losses and interest rate marks associated with acquired loans, the amount that we record as the fair values for the loans is generally less than the contractual unpaid principal balance due from the borrowers, with the difference being referred to as the “discount” on the acquired loans. For non-impaired purchased loans, we accrete the discount over the lives of the loans in a manner consistent with the guidance for accounting for loan origination fees and costs.

For purchased credit-impaired (“PCI”) loans, the excess of the cash flows initially expected to be collected over the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date (i.e., the accretable yield) is accreted into interest income over the estimated remaining life of the loans using the effective yield method, provided that the timing and the amount of future cash flows is reasonably estimable. Accordingly, such loans are not classified as nonaccrual and they are considered to be accruing because their interest income relates to the accretable yield recognized under accounting for PCI loans and not to contractual interest payments. The difference between the contractually required payments and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition, considering the impact of prepayments, is referred to as the nonaccretable difference.

Subsequent to an acquisition, estimates of cash flows expected to be collected are updated periodically based on updated assumptions regarding default rates, loss severities, and other factors that are reflective of current market conditions. If there is a decrease in cash flows expected to be collected, the provision for loan losses is charged, resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses. If the Company has a probable increase in cash flows expected to be collected, we will first reverse any previously established allowance for loan losses and then increase interest income as a prospective yield adjustment over the remaining life of the loan. The impact of changes in variable interest rates is recognized prospectively as adjustments to interest income.

See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements above for information about accounting standards that we have recently adopted.

Net income available to common shareholders ~~amounted to $22.7~~for the first quarter of 2019 was $22.3 million, or ~~$0.77~~$0.75 per diluted common share, ~~for the three months ended June 30, 2018,~~ an increase of ~~71.1%~~7.1% in earnings per share from the ~~$11.2~~$20.7 million, or ~~$0.45~~$0.70 per diluted common share, recorded in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017.~~

For the six months ended June 30, 2018, we recorded net income available to common shareholders of $43.4 million, or $1.46 per diluted common share, an increase of 82.5% in earnings per share from the $18.7 million, or $0.80 per diluted common share, for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

Comparisons for the financial periods presented were significantly impacted by our acquisitions of Carolina Bank in March 2017 with total assets of $684 million and Asheville Savings Bank in October 2017 with $798 million in total assets. The assets, liabilities and earnings for these acquisitions were recorded beginning on their respective acquisition dates.2018.

Net interest income for the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 was ~~$51.2~~$53.4 million, a ~~28.3%~~5.7% increase from the ~~$39.9~~$50.5 million recorded in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017. Net interest income for the first six months of 2018 amounted to $101.7 million, a 37.1% increase from the $74.2 million recorded in the comparable period of 2017.~~2018. The increase in net interest income was ~~primarily~~ due to ~~the acquisitions of Carolina Bank and Asheville Savings Bank, as well as higher amounts of loans outstanding as a result of organic growth.~~growth in interest-earning assets.

Our net interest margin (tax-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets) for the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 was ~~4.10%~~4.06% compared to ~~4.08%~~4.17% for the second quarter of 2017. For the six month period ended June 30, 2018, our net interest margin was 4.15% compared to 4.08% for the same period in 2017. Asset yields increased primarily as a result of five Federal Reserve interest rate increases since January 1, 2017. Funding costs also increased, but to a lesser degree. Also positively impacting interest income in 2018 was approximately $750,000 in interest recoveries received in the first quarter of ~~the year, which primarily related to the same loans that experienced significant allowance for loan loss recoveries discussed below~~2018. The decrease in ~~“Provisions for Loan Losses and Asset Quality.”~~

~~The~~the net interest ~~margins for the periods were also impacted by loan discount accretion associated with acquired loan portfolios. We recorded loan discount accretion amounting to $2.3 million~~margin realized in the second quarter of 2018, compared to $2.0 million in the second quarter of 2017. For the first six months of 2018 and 2017, loan discount accretion amounted to $4.4 million and $3.3 million, respectively. The increase in loan discount accretion in 20182019 was primarily due to ~~the~~lower loan ~~discounts recorded~~discount accretion, significant interest recoveries realized in the ~~acquisitions of Carolina Bank~~prior year, and ~~Asheville Savings Bank.~~interest bearing liability costs that have increased more than earning asset yields.

We recorded a provision for loan losses of $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2019 compared to a negative provision for loan losses of $3.7 million (reduction of the allowance for loan losses) ~~of $0.7 million~~ in the ~~second~~first quarter of 2018, compared to no provision for loan losses in the second quarter of 2017. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, we recorded a total negative provision for loan losses of $4.4 million compared to a total provision for loan losses of $0.7 million in the same period of 2017.

~~During~~2018. In the first ~~half~~quarter of 2018, we experienced net loan recoveries of ~~$4.4~~$3.7 million, ~~including full payoffs received on four loans in~~which drove the first quarter of 2018 that had been previously charged-down by approximately $3.3 million. The amounts received in excess of the prior charge-downs were recorded as interest income recoveries, and those four loans were primarily responsiblenegative provision for the ~~$750,000 in interest recoveries previously noted.~~

quarter. Our provision for loan losses ~~have also been impacted by continued improvement in~~has remained at a low level over the past several years as a result of strong asset quality. Our nonperforming assets to total assets ratio was 0.90% at June 30, 2018 compared to 1.21% at June 30, 2017. The ratio of annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was (0.21%), compared to 0.03% for the same period of 2017.quality, including low loan charge-offs.

Total noninterest income was ~~$16.1~~$14.6 million and ~~$11.9~~$15.8 million for the three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018, ~~and June 30, 2017, respectively. For~~respectively, with the ~~six months ended June 30, 2018, noninterest income amounted~~majority of the decrease relating to ~~$32.1 million compared to $21.7 million for the same period of 2017.~~

Core noninterest income for the second quarter of 2018 was $15.3 million, an increase of 31.6% from the $11.6 million reported for the second quarter of 2017. For the first six months of 2018, core noninterest income amounted to $31.5 million, a 47.2% increase from the $21.4 million recorded in the comparable period of 2017. Core noninterest income includes i) service charges on deposit accounts, ii) other service charges, commissions, and fees, iii) fees from presold mortgage loans, iv) commissions from sales of insurance and financial products, v) SBA consulting fees, vi) SBA loan sale gains, and vii) bank-owned life insurance income.

The primary reason for the increase in core noninterest income in 2018 was an increase in SBA loan sales volume. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we realized $2.6 million and $6.4 milliondeclines in gains on SBA loan sales, respectively. In comparison, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, we realized $0.9 million and $1.5 million in gains on SBA loan sales, respectively. Also contributing to the increase in core noninterest income in 2018 were the acquisitions of Carolina Bank and Asheville Savings Bank.sales.

Noninterest expenses amounted to ~~$38.9~~$39.3 million in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 compared to ~~$35.1~~$43.5 million recorded in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017. Noninterest expenses for~~2018. Most categories of noninterest expense decreased in the ~~six months ended June 30, 2018 amounted to $82.5 million~~first quarter 2019 compared to ~~$67.2 million in 2017. The increase in noninterest expenses in~~the first quarter of 2018 ~~related primarily~~due to operating efficiencies realized subsequent to the ~~Company’s acquisitions~~March 2018 merger conversion of ~~Carolina Bank and~~the Asheville Savings Bank operations into First Bank.

Also impacting expenses were other growth initiatives, including continued growth of our SBA consulting firm and SBA lending division, as well as the acquisition of an insurance agency during the third quarter of 2017.

Our effective tax rate for the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 was ~~22.1%~~20.9% compared to ~~33.2%~~22.0% in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017. For the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, our effective tax rate was 22.1% and 33.2%, respectively.~~2018. The ~~lower effective tax rate in 2018~~decline was due to a decrease in the ~~Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law in December 2017 and reduced the federal~~North Carolina corporate income tax rate from ~~35%~~3.0% to ~~21%.~~2.5%, as well as the impact of certain merger expenses recorded in 2018 that were not tax deductible.

Total assets at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 amounted to ~~$5.7~~$6.1 billion, a ~~26.3%~~7.2% increase from a year earlier. Total loans at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 amounted to ~~$4.1~~$4.3 billion, a ~~22.9%~~4.6% increase from a year earlier, and total deposits amounted to ~~$4.6~~$4.8 billion at ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, a ~~25.0%~~6.7% increase from a year earlier. ~~The significant increases are largely due to the acquisition of Asheville Savings Bank on October 1, 2017.~~

We ~~also~~ experienced steady organic loan and deposit growth during the first ~~six months~~quarter of ~~2018.~~2019. Organic loan growth ~~for the six months ended June 30, 2018~~ amounted to ~~$107~~$54.7 million, or 5.2% annualized, and organic deposit growth amounted to ~~$146.7~~$137.9 million, or ~~6.7% annualized during that same period. This growth was a result of~~12.0% annualized. We have ongoing internal initiatives to enhance loan and deposit growth, including our ~~recent~~continued expansion into higher growth ~~markets.~~markets such as Charlotte and Raleigh.

We remain well-capitalized by all regulatory standards, with aan estimated Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 of ~~13.17%~~14.21%, an increase from the ~~12.61%~~12.79% reported at ~~June 30, 2017. Our tangible common equity~~March 31, 2018.

During the first quarter of 2019, we adopted new accounting guidance which required us to ~~tangible~~record all long-term leases on our balance sheet. With the adoption of this guidance, we recorded $19.5 million in right-to-use lease assets, ~~ratio~~which was ~~8.59% at June 30, 2018,~~recorded within premises and equipment, and $19.5 million in lease obligations, which was recorded in other liabilities. These additions had an ~~increase~~insignificant impact on our capital ratios, and there was no impact to our earnings related to the adoption of ~~61 basis points from a year earlier.~~this new standard.

Net interest income is the largest component of earnings, representing the difference between interest and fees generated from earning assets and the interest costs of deposits and other funds needed to support those assets. Net interest income for the three month period ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 amounted to ~~$51.2~~$53.4 million, an increase of ~~$11.3~~$2.9 million, or ~~28.3%~~5.7%, from the ~~$39.9~~$50.5 million recorded in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017.~~2018. Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis for the three month period ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 amounted to ~~$51.6~~$53.8 million, an increase of ~~$11.0~~$2.9 million, or ~~27.1%~~5.7%, from the ~~$40.6~~$50.9 million recorded in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017.~~2018. We believe that analysis of net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis is useful and appropriate because it allows a comparison of net interest income amounts in different periods without taking into account the different mix of taxable versus non-taxable loans and investments that may have existed during those periods.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended March 31,
($ in thousands)	2018		2017		2019		2018
Net interest income, as reported	$	51,232		39,916	$	53,361		50,507
Tax-equivalent adjustment		367		693		424		356
Net interest income, tax-equivalent	$	51,599		40,609	$	53,785		50,863

Net interest income for the six month period ended June 30, 2018 amounted to $101.7 million, an increase of $27.5 million, or 37.1%, from the $74.2 million recorded in the first half of 2017. Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis for the six month period ended June 30, 2018 amounted to $102.5 million, an increase of $27.0 million, or 35.7%, from the $75.5 million recorded in the comparable period of 2017.

There are two primary factors that cause changes in the amount of net interest income we record - 1) changes in our loans and deposits balances, and 2) our net interest margin (tax-equivalent net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets).

For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, the higher net interest income compared to the same period of ~~2017~~2018 was due ~~primarily~~ to ~~the~~ growth in ~~our~~ loans ~~and deposits, as reflected in the tables below.~~outstanding.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,												For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018						2017						2019						2018
($ in thousands)	Average Volume		Average Rate		Interest Earned or Paid		Average Volume		Average Rate		Interest Earned or Paid		Average Volume		Average Rate		Interest Earned or Paid		Average Volume		Average Rate		Interest Earned or Paid
Assets
Loans (1)	$	4,133,689		4.99%	$	51,451	$	3,327,391		4.78%	$	39,656	$	4,280,272		5.11%	$	53,960	$	4,099,495		4.96%	$	50,170
Taxable securities		409,478		2.41%		2,465		292,333		2.35%		1,710		651,878		2.95%		4,737		410,586		2.55%		2,586
Non-taxable securities		50,531		2.92%		368		60,252		2.84%		427		45,752		2.99%		337		52,945		2.91%		380
Short-term investments, principally federal funds		449,206		2.19%		2,451		309,617		1.34%		1,034
Short-term investments, primarily overnight funds														394,864		2.77%		2,701		386,586		2.02%		1,925
Total interest-earning assets		5,042,904		4.51%		56,735		3,989,593		4.31%		42,827		5,372,766		4.66%		61,735		4,949,612		4.51%		55,061

Cash and due from banks		94,525						74,918						55,899						93,185
Premises and equipment		114,200						97,353						137,023						115,956
Other assets		419,991						286,541						379,361						390,763
Total assets	$	5,671,620					$	4,448,405					$	5,945,049					$	5,549,516

Liabilities
Interest bearing checking	$	877,270		0.10%	$	212	$	689,406		0.06%	$	108	$	908,039		0.15%	$	327	$	885,428		0.09%	$	199
Money market deposits		1,033,676		0.27%		707		791,967		0.18%		359		1,056,931		0.54%		1,395		1,005,588		0.23%		575
Savings deposits		442,671		0.19%		213		411,048		0.21%		218		426,843		0.27%		287		448,785		0.19%		205
Time deposits >$100,000		629,319		1.18%		1,850		488,141		0.72%		874		712,540		1.81%		3,178		599,727		1.00%		1,475
Other time deposits		281,704		0.36%		251		255,682		0.27%		173		263,171		0.60%		390		282,678		0.31%		219
Total interest-bearing deposits		3,264,640		0.40%		3,233		2,636,244		0.26%		1,732		3,367,524		0.67%		5,577		3,222,206		0.34%		2,673
Borrowings		407,052		2.24%		2,270		307,964		1.54%		1,179		406,190		2.79%		2,797		407,158		1.87%		1,881
Total interest-bearing liabilities		3,671,692		0.60%		5,503		2,944,208		0.40%		2,911		3,773,714		0.90%		8,374		3,629,364		0.51%		4,554

Noninterest bearing checking		1,247,919						974,700						1,336,707						1,181,599
Other liabilities		34,034						32,706						59,569						37,142
Shareholders’ equity		717,975						496,791						775,059						701,411
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	5,671,620					$	4,448,405					$	5,945,049					$	5,549,516

Net yield on interest-earning assets and net interest income				4.07%	$	51,232				4.01%	$	39,916				4.03%	$	53,361				4.14%	$	50,507
Net yield on interest-earning assets and net interest income – tax-equivalent (2)				4.10%	$	51,599				4.08%	$	40,609				4.06%	$	53,785				4.17%	$	50,863

Interest rate spread				3.91%						3.91%						3.76%						4.00%

Average prime rate				4.80%						4.04%						5.50%						4.53%

~~The tables above reflect significant increases in our levels~~Average loans outstanding for the first quarter of ~~loan and deposit balances. These increases~~2019 were ~~a result of organic growth,~~$4.280 billion, which was ~~approximately 5%-8% over~~$181 million, or 4.4%, higher than the ~~periods reflected, and more significantly growth we assumed in our acquisitions. On March 3, 2017, we acquired Carolina Bank, which had $498 million in~~average loans ~~and $585 million in deposits, and on October 1, 2017 we acquired Asheville Savings Bank, which had $606 million in loans and $679 million in deposits.~~

~~Our net interest margin (tax-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets, referred to as “net yield on interest-earning assets” in the tables above)~~outstanding for the ~~periods reflected above~~first quarter of 2018 ($4.099 billion). The higher amount of average loans outstanding in 2019 was ~~fairly stable, ranging from 4.08%-4.15%. Both asset yields and liability costs have increased approximately 18-25 basis points in 2018 compared to the same periods of 2017 shown above~~primarily due to ~~increases in the interest rate environment. While~~our loan ~~yields have increased~~growth initiatives, including our continued focus and expansion into higher than deposit costs, which has benefitted our net interest margin, our interest rates on borrowings are highly correlated to short term interest rates set by the Federal Reserve and have increased more significantly.growth markets.

Impacting our net interest margin for all periods reflected in the tables above are net accretion of purchase accounting premiums/discounts associated with acquired loans and deposits. For the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we recorded $2.4 million and $2.0 million, respectively, in net accretion of purchase accounting premiums/discounts that increased net interest income. For the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we recorded $4.5 million and $3.5 million, respectively. The increase in accretion in 2018 is due to the aforementioned acquisitions. Unaccreted loan discount has increased from $18.0 million at June 30, 2017 to $25.0 million at June 30, 2018 primarily as a result of the Asheville Savings Bank acquisition.

The mix of our loan portfolio remained substantially the same at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 compared to December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, with approximately 88% of our loans being real estate loans, ~~10%~~11% being commercial, financial, and agricultural loans, and the remaining 2%1% being consumer installment loans. The majority of our real estate loans are personal and commercial loans where real estate provides additional security for the loan.

Average total deposits outstanding for the first quarter of 2019 were $4.704 billion, which was $300 million, or 6.8%, higher than the average deposits outstanding for the first quarter of 2018 ($4.404 billion). We continue to implement strategies to grow deposits, which we believe to be the principal reason for the increases in the past year. Average transaction deposit accounts (noninterest bearing checking, interest bearing checking, money market and savings accounts) increased from $3.521 billion at March 31, 2018 to $3.729 billion at March 31, 2019, representing growth of $207 million, or 5.9%. Average time deposits also increased from $882 million at March 31, 2018 to $976 million at March 31, 2019, an increase of $93 million, or 10.6%.

Average borrowings remained stable at approximately $406 million at March 31, 2019 and 2018. Our cost of funds, which includes noninterest bearing checking accounts at a zero percent cost, was 0.66% in the first quarter of 2019 compared to 0.38% in the first quarter of 2018.

See additional information regarding changes in our loans and deposits in the section below entitled “Financial Condition.”

Our net interest margin (tax-equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets) for the first quarter of 2019 was 4.06% and was 4.17% for the first quarter of 2018. The decrease in the net interest margin realized in 2019 was primarily due to lower loan discount accretion, significant interest recoveries realized in the prior year and interest bearing liability costs that have increased more than earning asset yields, as discussed in the following paragraph.

We recorded loan discount accretion of $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2019, compared to $2.1 million in the first quarter of 2018. Loan discount accretion had an 11 basis point impact on the net interest margin in the first quarter of 2019 compared to an 18 basis point impact in the first quarter of 2018. The lower discount accretion in 2019 was attributable to paydowns in our acquired loan portfolios. Additionally, in the first quarter of 2018, we received approximately $750,000 in interest recoveries on loans that had been charged off in the past that added approximately 6 basis points to the net interest margin in the first quarter of 2018. Finally, over the past year, our interest bearing liability costs have increased more than earning asset yields, with the rate on interest bearing liabilities being 39 basis points higher in the first quarter of 2019 compared to the first quarter of 2018, while earning asset yields increased by approximately 27 basis points for that same period (exclusive of the impact of the loan discount accretion and interest recovery variances).

See additional information regarding net interest income in the section entitled “Interest Rate Risk.”

We recorded a provision for loan losses of $0.5 million for the first quarter of 2018 compared to a negative provision for loan losses (reduction of the allowance for loan losses) of ~~$0.7~~$3.7 million in ~~second~~first quarter of 2018 compared to no provision for loan losses for the second quarter of 2017. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, we recorded total negative provision for loan losses of $4.4 million compared to a total provision for loan losses of $0.7 million in the same period of 2017. During2018. In the first ~~half~~quarter of 2018, we experienced net loan recoveries of ~~$4.4~~$3.7 million, ~~compared to net~~which drove the negative provision for the quarter. Our provision for loan ~~charge-offs~~losses has remained at a low level over the past several years as a result of ~~$0.5 million in the first half of 2017.~~strong asset quality, including low loan charge-offs.

Our provision for loan loss levels have been impacted by continued improvement in asset quality. Nonperforming assets amounted to ~~$51.2~~$39.5 million at ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, a decrease of ~~7.0%~~23.5% from the ~~$55.0~~$51.7 million one year earlier. Our nonperforming assets to total assets ratio was ~~0.90%~~0.65% at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 compared to ~~1.21%~~0.92% at ~~June 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2018. Annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) as a percentage of average loans for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 was ~~(0.21%),~~0.04% compared to ~~0.03%~~(0.36%) for the same period of ~~2017.~~2018.

Total noninterest income was ~~$16.1~~$14.6 million in the ~~second~~first quarter of 2019 compared to $15.8 million for the first quarter of 2018, ~~compared to $11.9 million for~~as presented in the ~~second quarter of 2017. For the six months ended June 30, 2018,~~following table:

Management evaluates noninterest income ~~amounted to $32.1 million compared to $21.7 million for the same period of 2017.~~

on a basis that excludes items that can be volatile in nature, such as foreclosed property gains (losses), net. We consider this adjusted noninterest income. As presented in the table ~~below, core~~above, adjusted noninterest income for the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 was ~~$15.3~~$14.7 million, ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~31.6%~~7.9% from the ~~$11.6~~$16.1 million reported for the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017. For the first six months of~~ 2018, ~~core noninterest income amounted~~which was primarily due to ~~$31.5 million, a 47.2% increase from the $21.4 million~~decreases in SBA loan sale gains recorded in ~~the comparable period of 2017. As noted above, core~~2019 (see additional discussion below). Adjusted noninterest income includes i) service charges on deposit accounts, ii) other service charges, commissions, and fees, iii) fees from presold mortgage loans, iv) commissions from sales of insurance and financial products, ~~and~~ v) SBA consulting fees, vi) SBA loan sale gains, and vii) bank-owned life insurance income.

~~The following table presents our core noninterest income for the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.~~

As shown in the table above, service charges on deposit accounts ~~increased~~decreased from ~~$3.0~~$3.3 million in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2018 to ~~$3.1~~$2.9 million in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, service charges on deposit accounts amounted to $6.4 million, which is a $0.8 million increase from the $5.6 million recorded~~2019. The decrease in ~~the comparable period of 2017. The increase in 2018~~2019 was primarily due to ~~the aforementioned acquisitions.~~fewer instances of fees earned from customers overdrawing their accounts.

Other service charges, commissions, and fees increased in ~~2018~~the first quarter of 2019 compared to ~~2017,~~2018, primarily ~~due to a combination of the aforementioned acquisitions and~~as a result of higher debit card and credit card interchange ~~fees.~~fees associated with increased usage. We earn a small fee each time a customer uses a debit card to make a purchase. Due to the growth in checking accounts and increased customer usage of debit cards, we have experienced increases in this line item. Interchange income from credit cards has also increased due to growth in the number and usage of credit cards, which we believe is a result of ~~increased~~continued promotion of this ~~product.~~product

Fees from presold mortgages ~~amounted~~decreased from $0.9 million in the first quarter of 2018 to ~~$0.8~~$0.5 million ~~and $1.7 million for~~in the ~~three and six month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively, compared to $1.5 million and $2.3 million for~~first quarter of 2019. Fees decreased in the ~~three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017, respectively. The declines in 2018 are primarily~~first quarter of 2019 due to ~~our~~overall lower volumes in the mortgage ~~loan department originating a higher percentage of loans with construction components that are retained in our loan portfolio.~~industry and employee turnover within the mortgage department.

Commissions from sales of insurance and financial products amounted to ~~$2.1 million in the second quarter of 2018, compared to $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2017. For the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded $4.1~~approximately $2.0 million and $1.9 million ~~respectively,~~for the first three months of 2019 and 2018, respectively. The increase in ~~commissions from sales of insurance and financial products. The increase~~2019 was primarily due to increases in commissions from the ~~acquisition~~sales of ~~an insurance agency during the third quarter of 2017.~~our wealth management products.

~~The largest increase in core noninterest income in 2018 was in our SBA loan sale gains, which resulted from an increase in sales volumes.~~ During the ~~first half of~~three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, we ~~sold $82.4~~realized $2.0 million ~~of the guaranteed portions of newly originated SBA loans, which resulted in $6.4~~and $3.8 million in gains on ~~sales. In comparison, during the first half of 2017, we sold $20.6 million of the guaranteed portions, resulting in $1.5 million in gains on sales.~~

~~Bank-owned life insurance income was $1.3 million~~SBA loan sales, respectively. The decline in the first ~~six months of 2018 and $1.1 million in the first six months of 2017, which increased due to bank-owned life insurance policies assumed in the aforementioned acquisitions.~~

~~During the six months ended June 30, 2017, we recorded $0.2 million in losses from sales of securities. For the comparable period of 2018, we had no sales of securities.~~

~~Other gains and losses for the periods presented represent the net effects of miscellaneous gains and losses that are non-routine in nature. We recorded other gains of $0.9 million in the second~~ quarter of ~~2018, which primarily related to~~2019 gains was a ~~gain on a sale~~result of a ~~previously closed branch building. In the second quarter of 2017, we reported other gains of $0.5 million, which primarily related to the sale~~combination of a ~~pool of default judgements to a third-party firm.~~lower sales volume and lower premiums realized.

Noninterest expenses amounted to ~~$38.9~~$39.3 million in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018, a 10.8% increase over the $35.1~~2019 compared to $43.5 million recorded in the ~~same period~~first quarter of ~~2017. Noninterest expenses for~~2018. Most categories of noninterest expense decreased in the ~~six months ended June 30, 2018 amounted to $82.5 million~~first quarter 2019 compared to ~~$67.2 million in 2017. The increase in noninterest expenses in~~the first quarter of 2018 ~~related primarily~~due to operating efficiencies realized subsequent to the ~~acquisitions we completed in 2017.~~March 2018 merger conversion of the Asheville Savings Bank operations into First Bank.

~~Also impacting expenses were other growth initiatives, including continued growth of our SBA consulting firm and SBA lending division.~~

~~The acquisition activity was primarily responsible for the increase in salaries~~Salaries expense ~~which increased~~decreased to ~~$18.4~~$19.0 million in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 from the ~~$16.3 million recorded in the second quarter of 2017. Salaries expense for the first half of 2018 amounted to $37.8 million compared to $30.2 million in 2017.~~

~~Employee benefits expense was also impacted by the acquisition activity and amounted to $4.1~~$19.4 million in the ~~second~~first quarter of 2018 compared to $4.0 million in the second quarter of 2017. For the first six months of 2018, employee benefits expense amounted to $8.7 million compared to $8.0 million in 2017. Also increasing expense in 2018 was our increased 401k match effective January 1, 2018, which increased from effectively a 100% match up to 4% of an employee’s salary contribution to a 100% match up to 6% of an employee’s salary contribution.

~~Occupancy and equipment expense increased in~~ 2018, primarily due to a lower estimated payout for our annual incentive plan for the ~~acquisitions discussed above. For~~2019 fiscal year. Employee benefits expense remained relatively unchanged and amounted to $4.6 million in each of the ~~three months ended June 30, 2018,~~first quarters of 2019 and 2018.

The combined amount of occupancy and equipment expense ~~totaled $3.8 million compared to $3.7~~remained stable at $4.1 million in ~~the second quarter~~each of ~~2017. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, occupancy and equipment expense totaled $7.8 million compared to $7.0 million in~~ the first ~~half~~quarters of ~~2017.~~2019 and 2018.

Merger and acquisition expenses amounted to ~~$0.6 million and $3.4~~$0.1 million for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2018, respectively, and include $0.6~~March 31, 2019, compared to $2.8 million ~~and $1.4 million~~in the comparable period of ~~expense related to increases in an earn-out liability associated with a prior year acquisition, respectively. Merger~~2018. The merger and acquisition expenses ~~amounted~~recorded in the first quarter of 2018 related to ~~$1.1 million and $3.5 million for~~ the ~~three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.~~Asheville Savings Bank acquisition.

Intangibles amortization expense ~~increased from $1.0~~amounted to $1.3 million in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2017~~2019 compared to ~~$1.7 million in the second quarter of 2018 and from~~ $1.6 million in the first ~~half~~quarter of ~~2017 to $3.4 million in the first half of 2018,~~

~~primarily as a result of the amortization of intangible assets that we recorded in connection with our acquisitions.~~2018.

Other operating expenses amounted to $10.2 million ~~and $8.9 million~~ for the ~~second quarters~~first quarter of ~~2018 and 2017, respectively, and $21.3 million in the first half of 2018~~2019 compared to $16.9 million in the first half of 2017, with the increases primarily due to the acquisitions of Carolina Bank and Asheville Savings Bank. On March 16, 2018, we converted the data processing systems of Asheville Savings Bank to First Bank and consolidated three branches in Asheville, which was partially responsible for the decline in total noninterest expenses declining from $43.6$11.1 million in the first quarter of 2018, with the decrease relating to ~~$38.9 million in~~numerous operational efficiencies gained after the ~~second quarter~~March 2018 merger conversion of ~~2018.~~the operations of Asheville Savings Bank into First Bank.

For the ~~second~~first quarter of 2019, the provision for income taxes was $5.9 million, an effective tax rate of 20.9%. For the first quarter of 2018, the provision for income taxes was ~~$6.5~~$5.8 million, an effective tax rate of 22.1%, compared to $5.6 million for the same period of 2017, which is an effective tax rate of 33.2%. For the first six months of 2018, the provision for income taxes was $12.3 million, an effective tax rate of 22.1%, compared to $9.3 million for the same period of 2017, which was an effective tax rate of 33.2%22.0%. The ~~lower effective tax rate in 2018~~decline was due to a decrease in the ~~Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which was signed into law in December 2017 and reduced the federal~~North Carolina corporate income tax rate from ~~35%~~3.0% to ~~21%.~~2.5%, as well as the impact of certain merger expenses recorded in 2018 that were not tax deductible.

The consolidated statements of comprehensive income reflect other comprehensive ~~loss~~income of ~~$1.5~~$4.7 million during the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2018~~2019 compared ~~to other comprehensive income of $1.3 million during the second quarter of 2017. During the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we recorded~~ other comprehensive loss of ~~$7.0~~$5.5 million ~~and other comprehensive income~~during the first quarter of ~~$2.2 million, respectively.~~2018. The primary component of other comprehensive income for the periods presented was changes in unrealized holding gains (losses) of our available for sale securities. Our available for sale securities portfolio is predominantly comprised of fixed rate bonds that generally increase in value when market yields for fixed rate bonds decrease and decline in value when market yields for fixed rate bonds ~~increase, which occurred in the first half of 2018 and was primarily responsible for the other comprehensive loss.~~increase. Management has evaluated any unrealized losses on individual securities at each period end and determined that there is no other-than-temporary impairment.

The following table presents information regarding the nature of changes in our levels of loans and deposits for the twelve months ended ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 and for the first ~~six months~~quarter of ~~2018.~~2019.

~~(1) Includes the acquisition of Asheville Savings Bank on October 1, 2017, which had $606.2 million in loans and $679.1 million in deposits.~~

As derived from the table above, for the twelve months preceding ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, our total loans increased ~~$773.4~~$190.0 million, or ~~22.9%~~4.6%. ~~The loan growth from acquisitions is due to our acquisition~~For the first three months of ~~Asheville Savings Bank, which had $606 million on the date of acquisition. Asheville Savings Bank operated through 13 branches in the Asheville region of North Carolina. Internal~~2019, loan growth was ~~$167.2~~$54.7 million, or ~~5.0%,~~1.3%. Loan growth for ~~the twelve months ended June 30, 2018~~both periods was organic and ~~was $107.0 million, or 2.6%, for the first six months of 2018 (5.2% annualized). Internal loan growth has been~~ driven by our continued expansion into high-growth ~~markets.~~markets and our emphasis on SBA lending. We expect continued growth in our loan portfolio ~~throughout the remainder of 2018.~~in 2019.

The mix of our loan portfolio remains substantially the same at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 compared to December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. The majority of our real estate loans are personal and commercial loans where real estate provides additional security for the loan. Note 86 to the consolidated financial statements presents additional detailed information regarding our mix of loans.

~~We have also~~For both the three and twelve month periods ended March 31, 2019, we experienced internal growth in our core deposit balances. Total deposits increased by $909 million for the twelve months ended June 30, 2018, an increase of 25.0%. Of that increase, $679 million was assumed in the Asheville Savings Bank acquisition. Internal growth for that same period amounted to $230 million, or 6.3%. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, deposit growth amounted to $147 million, or 3.3% (6.6% annualized). We have experienced higher growth in our transaction accounts (checking, money market and savings) ~~compared to~~and in our retail time deposits, ~~which we believe is due~~excluding brokered and internet time deposits. We routinely engage in activities designed to grow and retain deposits, such as (1) emphasizing relationship banking to new and existing customers, ~~favoring transaction~~where borrowers are encouraged and normally expected to maintain deposit accounts with us, (2) pricing deposits at rate levels that will attract and/or retain deposits, and (3) continually working to identify and introduce new products that will attract customers or enhance our appeal as a primary provider of financial services. Total brokered and internet time deposits declined in both periods due to ~~their higher liquidity and~~ the ~~fact that transaction accounts have not been paying materially lower interest rates compared to time~~strong growth in our retail deposits. ~~However, we have recently seen some of our customers with larger balances transfer funds from their money market accounts to the time deposit > $100,000 category to attain higher interest rates.~~

With our deposit growth ~~discussed above was~~exceeding our loan growth over the ~~receipt of a $41 million money market deposit in the first quarter of 2018 that is expected to be transferred outside the Company in the third quarter of 2018.~~

~~Our overall~~past twelve months, our liquidity ~~increased slightly since June 30, 2017.~~levels have increased. Our liquid assets (cash and securities) as a percentage of our total deposits and borrowings increased from ~~18.8%~~20.0% at ~~June 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 to ~~20.2%~~22.6% at ~~June 30, 2018. Brokered deposits and borrowings as~~March 31, 2019.

Over the past year, we have invested a ~~percent~~portion of ~~overall funding remained substantially unchanged among the periods presented.~~our cash balances into available for sale investment securities, primarily to achieve higher yields. Total securities available for sale increased from $341.0 million at March 31, 2018 to $639.6 million at March 31, 2019, while total cash balance have declined from $526.7 million to $446.8 million over that same period.

Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans, ~~troubled debt restructurings,~~TDRs, loans past due 90 or more days and still accruing interest, and foreclosed real estate. Nonperforming assets are summarized as follows:

ASSET QUALITY DATA($ in thousands)	As of/for the quarter ended June 30, 2018			As of/for the quarter ended December 31, 2017		As of/for the quarter ended June 30, 2017			As of/for the quarter ended March 31, 2019		As of/for the quarter ended December 31, 2018		As of/for the quarter ended March 31, 2018

Nonperforming assets
Nonaccrual loans	$	25,494			20,968		22,795		$	20,684		22,575		21,849
Restructured loans – accruing		17,386			19,834		21,019
TDRs – accruing										12,457		13,418		18,495
Accruing loans >90 days past due		—			—		—			—		—		—
Total nonperforming loans		42,880			40,802		43,814			33,141		35,993		40,344
Foreclosed real estate		8,296			12,571		11,196			6,390		7,440		11,307
Total nonperforming assets	$	51,176			53,373		55,010		$	39,531		43,433		51,651

Purchased credit impaired loans not included above (1)	$	20,832			23,165		16,846		$	15,867		17,393		22,147

Asset Quality Ratios – All Assets
Net charge-offs to average loans – annualized		(0.07%	)		0.13%		(0.06%	)
Net charge-offs to average loans - annualized										0.04%		0.02%		(0.36%	)
Nonperforming loans to total loans		1.03%			1.01%		1.30%			0.77%		0.85%		0.98%
Nonperforming assets to total assets		0.90%			0.96%		1.21%			0.65%		0.74%		0.92%
Allowance for loan losses to total loans		0.56%			0.58%		0.71%			0.49%		0.50%		0.57%
Allowance for loan losses + unaccreted discount to total loans		1.16%			1.24%		1.24%
Allowance for loan losses + unaccreted discount on acquired loans to total loans										0.86%		0.90%		1.11%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans		54.33%			57.10%		54.83%			63.65%		58.45%		57.75%

We have reviewed the collateral for our nonperforming assets, including nonaccrual loans, and have included this review among the factors considered in the evaluation of the allowance for loan losses discussed below.

Consistent with the weak economy experienced in much of our market associated with the onset of the recession in 2008, we experienced higher levels of loan losses, delinquencies and nonperforming assets compared to our historical averages. In recent years, economic conditions have improved and our asset quality has steadily improved.

As noted in the table above, at ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, total nonaccrual loans amounted to ~~$25.5~~$20.7 million, compared to ~~$21.0~~$22.6 million at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~$22.8~~$21.8 million at ~~June 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2018. Nonaccrual loans have generally declined in recent years as our local economies have improved, and we continue to focus on resolving our problem assets. In the second quarter of 2018, we classified two loan relationships comprising three loans totaling approximately $3 million to nonaccrual status. We believe the loans are well-secured and will result in minimal losses.

~~The following is the composition, by loan type, of all of our nonaccrual loans at each period end:~~

~~“Restructured loans – accruing”, or troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”),~~TDRs are accruing loans for which we have granted concessions to the borrower as a result of the borrower’s financial difficulties. At ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, total accruing TDRs amounted to ~~$17.4~~$12.5 million, compared to ~~$19.8~~$13.4 million at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~$21.0~~$18.5 million at ~~June 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2018.

Foreclosed real estate includes primarily foreclosed properties. Total foreclosed real estate amounted to ~~$8.3~~$6.4 million at ~~June 30, 2018, $12.6~~March 31, 2019, $7.4 million at December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, and ~~$11.2~~$11.3 million at ~~June 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2018. Our foreclosed property balances have generally been decreasing as a result of sales activity during the periods and the improvement in our overall asset quality. In

The following is the ~~fourth quarter~~composition, by loan type, of ~~2017, we acquired Asheville Savings Bank~~all of our nonaccrual loans at each period end

The table above indicated decreases in most categories of nonaccrual loans. The decreases reflect stabilization in most of our market areas and ~~assumed approximately $3 million~~our increased focus on the resolution of ~~foreclosed real estate in this transaction.~~our nonperforming assets.

We believe that the fair values of the items of foreclosed real estate, less estimated costs to sell, equal or exceed their respective carrying values at the dates presented. The following table presents the detail of all of our foreclosed real estate at each period end:

($ in thousands)	At June 30, 2018		At December 31, 2017		At June 30, 2017		At March 31, 2019		At December 31, 2018		At March 31, 2018
Vacant land	$	2,521		6,032		4,132
Vacant land and farmland							$	1,968		2,035		2,852
1-4 family residential properties		3,973		4,229		4,648		1,526		2,311		3,710
Commercial real estate		1,802		2,310		2,416		2,896		3,094		4,745
Total foreclosed real estate	$	8,296		12,571		11,196	$	6,390		7,440		11,307

The following table presents geographical information regarding our nonperforming assets at ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019.

	As of June 30, 2018								As of March 31, 2019
($ in thousands)	Total Nonperforming Loans		Total Loans		Nonperforming Loans to Total Loans		Total Foreclosed Real Estate			Total Nonperforming Loans		Total Loans		Nonperforming Loans to Total Loans		Total Foreclosed Real Estate

Region (1)
Eastern Region (NC)	$	13,314		868,000		1.5%		304		$	8,487		916,000		0.93%	$	1,973
Triangle Region (NC)		11,510		856,000		1.3%		1,486			7,722		914,000		0.84%		1,148
Triad Region (NC)		7,819		914,000		0.9%		1,227			5,521		867,000		0.64%		202
Charlotte Region (NC)		1,024		278,000		0.4%		264			1,223		334,000		0.37%		180
Southern Piedmont Region (NC)		6,430		267,000		2.4%		1,228			5,868		268,000		2.19%		743
Western Region (NC)		598		689,000		0.1%		1,958			1,137		684,000		0.17%		1,064
South Carolina Region		1,785		144,000		1.2%		669			1,186		161,000		0.74%		389
Former Virginia Region		355		2,000		17.8%		1,160			91		1,000		9.10%		691
Other		45		131,000		0.0%		—			1,906		159,000		1.20%		—
Total	$	42,880		4,149,000		1.0%		8,296		$	33,141		4,304,000		0.77%	$	6,390

Eastern North Carolina Region - New Hanover, Brunswick, Duplin, Dare, Beaufort, Pitt, Onslow, Carteret

Triad North Carolina Region - Montgomery, Randolph, Davidson, Rockingham, Guilford, Stanly, Forsyth, Alamance

Southern Piedmont North Carolina Region - ~~Anson,~~ Richmond, Scotland, Robeson, Bladen, Columbus, Cumberland

Western North Carolina Region – Buncombe, Henderson, McDowell, Madison, Transylvania

Other includes loans originated on a national basis through the Company’s SBA Lending Division

The allowance for loan losses is created by direct charges to operations (known as a “provision for loan losses” for the period in which the charge is taken). Losses on loans are charged against the allowance in the period in which such loans, in management’s opinion, become uncollectible. The recoveries realized during the period are credited to this allowance.

We have no foreign loans, few agricultural loans and do not engage in significant lease financing or highly leveraged transactions. Commercial loans are diversified among a variety of industries. The majority of our real estate loans are primarily personal and commercial loans where real estate provides additional security for the loan. Collateral for virtually all of these loans is located within our principal market area.

The factors that influence management’s judgment in determining the amount charged to operating expense include recent loan loss experience, composition of the loan portfolio, evaluation of probable inherent losses and current economic conditions.

For the periods indicated, the following table summarizes our balances of loans outstanding, average loans outstanding, changes in the allowance for loan losses arising from charge-offs and recoveries, and additions to the allowance for loan losses that have been charged to expense.

We recorded a provision for loan losses of $0.5 million in the first quarter of 2019, compared to a negative provision for loan losses (reduction of the allowance for loan losses) of ~~$4.4~~$3.7 million in the first ~~six months~~quarter of 2018. In the first quarter of 2018, ~~compared to a~~the Company experienced net loan recoveries of $3.7 million, which drove the negative provision for the quarter and was the primary reason for the variance in the provision for loan losses ~~of $0.7 million in~~when comparing the first ~~six months~~quarter of ~~2017.~~

~~The~~2019 to the first quarter of 2018. Other factors impacting the provision for loan ~~losses that we record is driven by an~~loss are discussed in the following two paragraphs.

Our allowance for loan loss is a mathematical model with the primary factors impacting this model being loan growth, ~~asset quality trends, and net charge-off history. The~~ net charge-off history, ~~component incorporates our~~and asset quality trends. Our allowance for loan loss model utilizes the net charge-offs experienced in the most recent ~~years.~~years as a significant component of estimating the current allowance for loan losses that is necessary. Thus, older ~~periods~~years (and parts thereof) systematically age out and are excluded from the analysis as time goes on. In ~~most~~ recent ~~quarters,~~years, the new periods have had significantly lower net charge-offs (and net recoveries in some periods) than the older periods rolling out of the model. This has resulted in a lower required amount of allowance for loan losses in our modeling. The low level of net-charge offs (or net recoveries) experienced over the past ~~two~~several years has been the primary reason for the low (or negative) provisions for loan losses recorded.

Organic loan growth for the first three months of 2019 of $54.7 million was relatively consistent with the $71.4 million realized for first quarter of 2018, with the variance not significantly impacting the required allowance for loan ~~losses~~losses. As it relates to asset quality trends, our total classified and nonaccrual loans amounted to ~~$23.3~~$61 million at ~~June 30,~~both March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 compared to ~~$23.3~~$80.0 million at ~~December~~March 31, ~~2017 and $24.0 million at June 30, 2017.~~ 2018.

The ratio of our allowance to total loans ~~has declined from 0.71%~~was 0.49%, 0.50%, and 0.57% at ~~June 30, 2017 to 0.56% at June 30,~~March 31, 2019, December 31, 2018, asand March 31, 2018, respectively. The decline in this ratio was a result of the factors discussed above that impacted our relatively low levels of provision for loan ~~losses, as well as applicable~~losses. Our relatively low level of allowance to total loans is significantly impacted by the acquisitions of Carolina Bank and Asheville Savings Bank in 2017, which had over $1 billion in total loans. Applicable accounting guidance ~~that does~~did not allow us to record an allowance for loan losses upon the acquisition of ~~loans. Instead~~loans – instead the acquired loans ~~are~~were recorded at their discounted fair value, which ~~includes~~included the consideration of any expected losses. No allowance for loan losses iswill be recorded for the acquired loans ~~until~~unless the expected credit losses exceed the remaining unamortized discounts – based on an individual basis for purchased credit impaired loans and on a pooled basis for performing acquired loans. See Critical Accounting Policies above for further discussion. Unaccreted discount on acquired loans, which is available to absorb loan losses, amounted to ~~$25.0~~$16.1 million, ~~$26.9~~$17.3 million, and ~~$18.0~~$22.3 million at ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, and ~~June 30, 2017, respectively. The ratio of allowance for loan losses plus unaccreted discount was 1.16%, 1.24%, and 1.24% at June 30,~~March 31, 2018, ~~December 31, 2017, and June 30, 2017,~~ respectively.

We believe our reserve levels are adequate to cover probable loan losses on the loans outstanding as of each reporting date. It must be emphasized, however, that the determination of the reserve using our procedures and methods rests upon various judgments and assumptions about economic conditions and other factors affecting loans. No assurance can be given that we will not in any particular period sustain loan losses that are sizable in relation to the amounts reserved or that subsequent evaluations of the loan portfolio, in light of conditions and factors then prevailing, will not require significant changes in the allowance for loan losses or future charges to earnings. See “Critical Accounting Policies – Allowance for Loan Losses” above.

In addition, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our allowance for loan losses and value of other real estate. Such agencies may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance or the carrying value of other real estate based on their judgments about information available at the time of their examinations.

Based on the results of our loan analysis and grading program and our evaluation of the allowance for loan losses at ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, there have been no material changes to the allocation of the allowance for loan losses among the various categories of loans since December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Our liquidity is determined by our ability to convert assets to cash or acquire alternative sources of funds to meet the needs of our customers who are withdrawing or borrowing funds, and to maintain required reserve levels, pay expenses and operate the Company on an ongoing basis. Our primary liquidity sources are net income from operations, cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and other short-term investments. Our securities portfolio is comprised almost entirely of readily marketable securities, which could also be sold to provide cash.

In addition to internally generated liquidity sources, we have the ability to obtain borrowings from the following three sources - 1) an approximately ~~$910 million~~$1.080 billion line of credit with the Federal Home Loan Bank (of which ~~$353~~$352 million was outstanding at ~~June 30, 2018~~both March 31, 2019 and ~~$354 million was outstanding at~~ December 31, ~~2017)~~2018), 2) a $35 million federal funds line with a correspondent bank (of which none was outstanding at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 or December 31, ~~2017)~~2018), and 3) an approximately ~~$129~~$123 million line of credit through the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond’s discount window (of which none was outstanding at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 or December 31, ~~2017)~~2018). In addition to the outstanding borrowings from the FHLB that reduce the available borrowing capacity of that line of credit, our borrowing capacity was reduced by $190 million at ~~June 30, 2018~~both March 31, 2019 and ~~$198 million at~~ December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, as a result of our pledging letters of credit for public deposits at each of those dates. Unused and available lines of credit amounted to ~~$531~~$505 million at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 compared to ~~$528~~$502 million at December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

Our overall liquidity has increased since ~~June 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2018 due primarily to the strong deposit growth expeirenced. Our liquid assets (cash and securities) as a percentage of our total deposits and borrowings increased from ~~18.8%~~20.0% at ~~June 30, 2017~~March 31, 2018 to ~~20.2%~~22.6% at ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019.

We believe our liquidity sources, including unused lines of credit, are at an acceptable level and remain adequate to meet our operating needs in the foreseeable future. We will continue to monitor our liquidity position carefully and will explore and implement strategies to increase liquidity if deemed appropriate.

The amount and timing of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments has not changed materially since December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, detail of which is presented in Table 18 on page 8277 of our ~~2017~~2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We are not involved in any other legal proceedings that, in our opinion, could have a material effect on our consolidated financial position.

Off-balance sheet arrangements include transactions, agreements, or other contractual arrangements pursuant to which we have obligations or provide guarantees on behalf of an unconsolidated entity. We have no off-balance sheet arrangements of this kind other than letters of credit and repayment guarantees associated with our trust preferred securities.

Derivative financial instruments include futures, forwards, interest rate swaps, options contracts, and other financial instruments with similar characteristics. We have not engaged in significant derivative activities through ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, and have no current plans to do so.

The Company is regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Board (“Federal Reserve”) and is subject to the securities registration and public reporting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Our banking subsidiary, First Bank, is also regulated by the North Carolina Office of the Commissioner of Banks. We are not aware of any recommendations of regulatory authorities or otherwise which, if they were to be implemented, would have a material effect on our liquidity, capital resources, or operations.

We must comply with regulatory capital requirements established by the Federal Reserve. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.

The capital standards require us to maintain minimum ratios of “Common Equity Tier 1” capital to total risk-weighted assets, “Tier 1” capital to total risk-weighted assets, and total capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.50%, 6.00% and 8.00%, respectively. Common Equity Tier 1 capital is comprised of common stock and related surplus, plus retained earnings, and is reduced by goodwill and other intangible assets, net of associated deferred tax liabilities. Tier 1 capital is comprised of Common Equity Tier 1 capital plus Additional Tier 1 Capital, which for the Company includes non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities. Total capital is comprised of Tier 1 capital plus certain adjustments, the largest of which is our allowance for loan losses. Risk-weighted assets refer to our on- and off-balance sheet exposures, adjusted for their related risk levels using formulas set forth in Federal Reserve regulations.

The capital conservation buffer requirement began to be phased in on January 1, 2016, at 0.625% of risk weighted assets, and ~~will increase~~increased each year until fully implemented at 2.5% inon January 1, 2019.

In addition to the risk-based capital requirements described above, we are subject to a leverage capital requirement, which calls for a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital (as defined above) to quarterly average total assets of 3.00% to 5.00%, depending upon the institution’s composite ratings as determined by its regulators. The Federal Reserve has not advised us of any requirement specifically applicable to us.

At ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, our capital ratios exceeded the regulatory minimum ratios discussed above. The following table presents our capital ratios and the regulatory minimums discussed above for the periods indicated.

	June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017		June 30, 2017		March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018		March 31, 2018

Risk-based capital ratios:
Common equity Tier 1 to Tier 1 risk weighted assets		11.41%		10.72%		10.44%		12.51%		12.28%		11.01%
Minimum required Common equity Tier 1 capital		6.375%		5.75%		5.75%		7.00%		6.375%		6.375%

Tier I capital to Tier 1 risk weighted assets		12.61%		11.94%		11.91%		13.73%		13.48%		12.23%
Minimum required Tier 1 capital		7.875%		7.25%		7.25%		8.50%		7.875%		7.875%

Total risk-based capital to Tier II risk weighted assets		13.17%		12.50%		12.61%		14.21%		13.97%		12.78%
Minimum required total risk-based capital		9.875%		9.25%		9.25%		10.50%		9.875%		9.875%

Leverage capital ratios:
Tier 1 capital to quarterly average total assets		10.05%		9.58%		9.77%		10.69%		10.47%		9.88%
Minimum required Tier 1 leverage capital		4.00%		4.00%		4.00%		4.00%		4.00%		4.00%

First Bank is also subject to capital requirements that do not vary materially from the Company’s capital ratios presented above. At ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, First Bank significantly exceeded the minimum ratios established by the regulatory authorities.

In addition to regulatory capital ratios, we also closely monitor our ratio of tangible common equity to tangible assets (“TCE Ratio”). Our TCE ratio was ~~8.59%~~9.21% at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 compared to ~~8.23%~~9.07% at December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~7.98%~~8.35% at ~~June 30, 2017.~~March 31, 2018.

The following is a list of business development and other miscellaneous matters affecting First Bancorp and First Bank, our bank subsidiary.

We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock during the first ~~six~~three months of ~~2018.~~2019. At ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, we had ~~approximately 214,000 shares available for repurchase under existing~~ authority from our board of ~~directors.~~directors to repurchase up to $25 million in shares of the Company’s common stock. We may repurchase these shares in open market and privately negotiated transactions, as market conditions and our liquidity warrants, subject to compliance with applicable regulations. See also Part II, Item 2 “Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.”

INTEREST RATE RISK (INCLUDING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK)

Net interest income is our most significant component of earnings. Notwithstanding changes in volumes of loans and deposits, our level of net interest income is continually at risk due to the effect that changes in general market interest rate trends have on interest yields earned and paid with respect to our various categories of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. It is our policy to maintain portfolios of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities with maturities and repricing opportunities that will afford protection, to the extent practical, against wide interest rate fluctuations. Our exposure to interest rate risk is analyzed on a regular basis by management using standard GAP reports, maturity reports, and an asset/liability software model that simulates future levels of interest income and expense based on current interest rates, expected future interest rates, and various intervals of “shock” interest rates. Over the years, we have been able to maintain a fairly consistent yield on average earning assets (net interest margin). Over the past five calendar years, our net interest margin has ranged from a low of 4.03% (realized in 2016) to a high of ~~4.92%~~4.58% (realized in ~~2013)~~2014). UpFrom 2008 until the ~~end~~fourth quarter of 2015, the prime rate of interest had remained at 3.25% ~~since 2008. In response to~~. Beginning in December 2015, the Federal Reserve ~~actions,~~began steadily increasing the prime rate ~~increased to 3.50% on~~of interest, which reached a rate of 5.50% in December ~~31, 2015 and to 3.75% on December 15, 2016. In 2017 and~~ 2018 ~~Federal Reserve actions steadily increased~~(also the ~~prime rate five additional times, up to 5.00%, which was the~~current rate at ~~June 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019). The consistency of the net interest margin is aided by the relatively low level of long-term interest rate exposure that we maintain. At ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, approximately 77% of our interest-earning assets were subject to repricing within five years (because they are either adjustable rate assets or they are fixed rate assets that mature) and substantially all of our interest-bearing liabilities reprice within five years.

Using stated maturities for all fixed rate instruments except mortgage-backed securities (which are allocated in the periods of their expected payback) and securities and borrowings with call features that are expected to be called (which are shown in the period of their expected call). At ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, we had ~~$1.3~~$1.4 billion more in interest-bearing liabilities that are subject to interest rate changes within one year than earning assets. This generally would indicate that net interest income would experience downward pressure in a rising interest rate environment and would benefit from a declining interest rate environment. However, this method of analyzing interest sensitivity only measures the magnitude of the timing differences and does not address earnings, market value, or management actions. Also, interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in market rates. In addition to the effects of “when” various rate-sensitive products reprice, market rate changes may not result in uniform changes in rates among all products. For example, included in interest-bearing liabilities subject to interest rate changes within one year at ~~June 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 are deposits totaling $2.4 billion comprised of checking, savings, and certain types of money market deposits with interest rates set by management. These types of deposits historically have not repriced with, or in the same proportion, as general market indicators.

Overall, we believe that in the near term (twelve months), net interest income will not likely experience significant downward pressure from rising interest rates. Similarly, we would not expect a significant increase in near term net interest income from falling interest rates. Generally, when rates change, our interest-sensitive assets that are subject to adjustment reprice immediately at the full amount of the change, while our interest-sensitive liabilities that are subject to adjustment reprice at a lag to the rate change and typically not to the full extent of the rate change. In the short-term (less than six months), this results in us being asset-sensitive, meaning that our net interest income benefits from an increase in interest rates and is negatively impacted by a decrease in interest rates. However, in the twelve-month horizon, the impact of having a higher level of interest-sensitive liabilities lessens the short-term effects of changes in interest rates.

The general discussion in the foregoing paragraph applies most directly in a “normal” interest rate environment in which longer-term maturity instruments carry higher interest rates than short-term maturity instruments, and is less applicable in periods in which there is a “flat” interest rate curve. A “flat yield curve” means that short-term interest rates are substantially the same as long-term interest rates. As a result of the prolonged negative/fragile economic environment, the Federal Reserve took steps to suppress long-term interest rates in an effort to boost the housing market, increase employment, and stimulate the economy, which resulted in a flat interest rate curve. A flat interest rate curve is an unfavorable interest rate environment for many banks, including the Company, as short-term interest rates generally drive our deposit pricing and longer-term interest rates generally drive loan pricing. When these rates converge, the profit spread we realize between loan yields and deposit rates narrows, which pressures our net interest margin.

While there have been periods in the last few years that the yield curve has steepened somewhat, it currently remains relatively flat. This flat yield curve and the intense competition for high-quality loans in our market areas have limited our ability to charge higher rates on loans, and thus we continue to experience challenges in increasing our loan yields and net interest margin.

As it relates to deposits, the Federal Reserve made no changes to the short term interest rates it sets directly from 2008 until mid-December 2015, and since that time we have been able to reprice many of our maturing time deposits at lower interest rates. We were also able to generally decrease the rates we paid on other categories of deposits as a result of declining short-term interest rates in the marketplace and an increase in liquidity that lessened our need to offer premium interest rates. However, as ~~our average funding rate approached zero several years ago, meaningful further declines were not possible. Thus far,~~a result of the ~~seven~~nine interest rate increases initiated by the Federal Reserve ~~over the past few years have not resulted in~~since 2015 and significant competitive ~~pressure~~pressures in our market area, we have had to increase deposit ~~rates, although~~rates. Deposit pricing competition began to intensify in the second half of 2018 and we ~~are choosing~~expect it to ~~pay~~continue. In the first quarter of 2019, our deposit costs have risen at a higher ~~rates to price-sensitive customers~~rate than the increase in ~~certain situations.~~asset yields, and thus our net interest margin compressed slightly in the first three months of 2019.

As previously discussed in the section “Net Interest Income,” our net interest income has been impacted by certain purchase accounting adjustments related to the acquired banks. The purchase accounting adjustments related to the premium amortization on loans, deposits and borrowings are based on amortization schedules and are thus systematic and predictable. The accretion of the loan discount on acquired loans ~~which~~ amounted to ~~$4.4~~$1.1 million and ~~$3.3~~$2.0 million for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively, is less predictable and could be materially different among periods. This is because of the magnitude of the discounts that ~~were~~are initially recorded and the fact that the accretion being recorded is dependent on both the credit quality of the acquired loans and the impact of any accelerated loan repayments, including payoffs. If the credit quality of the loans declines, some, or all, of the remaining discount will cease to be accreted into income. If the underlying loans experience accelerated paydowns or improved performance expectations, the remaining discount will be accreted into income on an accelerated basis. In the event of total payoff, the remaining discount will be entirely accreted into income in the period of the payoff. Each of these factors is difficult to predict and susceptible to volatility. The remaining loan discount on acquired ~~accruing~~ loans amounted to ~~$25.0~~$16.1 million at ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 compared to $22.3 million at March 31, 2018.

Based on our most recent interest rate modeling, which assumes ~~one or two additional interest~~no more rate ~~increases for the remainder of 2018~~changes during 2019 (federal funds rate = ~~2.25%-2.50%~~2.50%, prime = ~~5.25%-5.50%~~5.50%), we project that our net interest margin for 2019 will likely ~~remain fairly stable for~~decline slightly in the ~~remainder of~~near term due to the ~~year. We expect asset yields to increase,~~loan and ~~we also expect that we will experience pressure to increase our~~ deposit ~~rates.~~pricing pressures discussed above.

We have no market risk sensitive instruments held for trading purposes, nor do we maintain any foreign currency positions.

See additional discussion regarding net interest income, as well as discussion of the changes in the annual net interest margin in the section entitled “Net Interest Income” above.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, which are our controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed is communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Based on the evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in allowing timely decisions regarding disclosure to be made about material information required to be included in our periodic reports with the SEC. In addition, no change in our internal control over financial reporting has occurred during, or subsequent to, the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Various legal proceedings may arise in the ordinary course of business and may be pending or threatened against the Company and its subsidiaries. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries is involved in any pending legal proceedings that management believes are material to the Company or its consolidated financial position. If an exposure were to be identified, it is the Company’s policy to establish and accrue appropriate reserves during the accounting period in which a loss is deemed to be probable and the amount is determinable.

Investing in shares of our common stock involves certain risks, including those identified and described in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, as well as cautionary statements contained in this Form 10-Q, including those under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements” set forth in the forepart of this Form 10-Q, risks and matters described elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the SEC.

During the three months ended ~~June 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, there were no unregistered sales of the Company’s securities.

The following exhibits are filed with this report or, as noted, are incorporated by reference. Except as noted below the exhibits identified have Securities and Exchange Commission File No. 000-15572. Management contracts, compensatory plans and arrangements are marked with an asterisk (*).

Copies of exhibits are available upon written request to: First Bancorp, Elizabeth B. Bostian, Secretary, 300 SW Broad Street, Southern Pines, North Carolina, 28387

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

North Carolina		56-1421916
(State or Other Jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)		Identification Number)

300 SW Broad St., Southern Pines, North Carolina		28387
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)


(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)		(910) 246-2500

xLarge Accelerated Filer	oAccelerated Filer
oNon-Accelerated Filer	oSmaller Reporting Company
	oEmerging growth company

Title of each class	Trading Symbol	Name of each exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, No Par Value	FBNC	The Nasdaq Global Select Market


	Page

Part I. Financial Information

Item 1 - Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets - ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and March 31, 2018 ~~and June 30, 2017~~ (With Comparative Amounts at December 31, ~~2017)~~2018)	4

Consolidated Statements of Income - For the Periods Ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018 ~~and 2017~~	5

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income - For the Periods Ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018 ~~and 2017~~	6

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity - For the Periods Ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018 ~~and 2017~~	7

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - For the Periods Ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019 and 2018 ~~and 2017~~	8

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	9

Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Results of Operations and Financial Condition	4033

Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	5647

Item 4 – Controls and Procedures	5849

Part II. Other Information

Item 1 – Legal Proceedings	5849

Item 1A – Risk Factors	5849

Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	5950

Item 6 – Exhibits	5950

Signatures	6152

($ in thousands)	As Recorded by Carolina Bank			Initial Fair Value Adjustments				Measurement Period Adjustments				As Recorded by First Bancorp
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	81,466			(2	)	(a)		—				81,464
Securities		49,629			(261	)	(b)		—				49,368
Loans, gross		505,560			(5,469	)	(c)		146		(l)		497,522
					(2,715	)	(d)		—
Allowance for loan losses		(5,746	)		5,746		(e)		—				—
Premises and equipment		17,967			4,251		(f)		(319	)	(m)		21,899
Core deposit intangible		—			8,790		(g)		—				8,790
Other		34,976			(4,804	)	(h)		2,225		(n)		32,397
Total		683,852			5,536				2,052				691,440

Liabilities
Deposits	$	584,950			431		(i)		—				585,381
Borrowings		21,855			(2,855	)	(j)		(262	)	(o)		18,738
Other		12,855			225		(k)		(444	)	(p)		12,636
Total		619,660			(2,199	)			(706	)			616,755

Net identifiable assets acquired													74,685

Total cost of acquisition
Value of stock issued				$	114,478
Cash paid in the acquisition					25,279
Total cost of acquisition													139,757

Goodwill recorded related to acquisition of Carolina Bank												$	65,072

(In thousands, except per share - unaudited)	Common Stock					Retained			Stock in Rabbi Trust Assumed in Acquisi-			Rabbi Trust			Accumulated Other Compre- hensive Income			Total Share- holders’
	Shares			Amount		Earnings			tion			Obligation			(Loss)			Equity

Balances, January 1, 2017		20,845		$	147,287		225,921			—			—			(5,107	)		368,101

Net income							18,709												18,709
Cash dividends declared ($0.16 per common share)							(3,948	)											(3,948	)
Equity issued pursuant to acquisition		3,799			114,478					(7,688	)		7,688						114,478
Payment of deferred fees										3,431			(3,431	)					—
Stock option exercises		16			287														287
Stock-based compensation		18			849														849
Other comprehensive income (loss)																2,175			2,175

Balances, June 30, 2017		24,678		$	262,901		240,682			(4,257	)		4,257			(2,932	)		500,651


Balances, January 1, 2018		29,639		$	432,794		264,331			(3,581	)		3,581			(4,146	)		692,979

Net income							43,403												43,403
Cash dividends declared ($0.20 per common share)							(5,934	)											(5,934	)
Payment of deferred fees										367			(367	)					—
Stock option exercises		25			324														324
Stock withheld for payment of taxes		(4	)		—														—
Stock-based compensation		43			999														999
Other comprehensive income (loss)																(7,049	)		(7,049	)

Balances, June 30, 2018		29,703		$	434,117		301,800			(3,214	)		3,214			(11,195	)		724,722

($ in thousands, except per share - unaudited)	Common Stock						Retained			Stock in Rabbi Trust Assumed in Acquisi-			Rabbi Trust		Accumulated Other Compre- hensive Income			Total Share- holders’
	Shares			Amount			Earnings			tion			Obligation		(Loss)			Equity

Balances, January 1, 2018		29,639		$	432,794			264,331			(3,581	)		3,581		(4,146	)		692,979

Net income								20,673											20,673
Cash dividends declared ($0.10 per common share)								(2,966	)										(2,966	)
Change in Rabbi Trust Obligation											(7	)		7					—
Stock option exercises		8			108														108
Stock-based compensation		14			403														403
Other comprehensive income (loss)																(5,547	)		(5,547	)

Balances, March 31, 2018		29,661		$	433,305			282,038			(3,588	)		3,588		(9,693	)		705,650


Balances, January 1, 2019		29,725		$	434,453			341,738			(3,235	)		3,235		(11,961	)		764,230

Net income								22,285											22,285
Cash dividends declared ($0.12 per common share)								(3,568	)										(3,568	)
Change in Rabbi Trust Obligation											(10	)		10					—
Stock-based compensation		24			586														586
Stock withheld for payment of taxes		(3	)		(91	)													(91	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)																4,697			4,697

Balances, March 31, 2019		29,746		$	434,948			360,455			(3,245	)		3,245		(7,264	)		788,139

($ in thousands, except share data)	Carolina Bank earnings - March 3, 2017 to June 30, 2017 - included in Company’s earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2017		Pro Forma Combined Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Net interest income	$	8,778		78,260
Noninterest income		1,871		22,874
Total revenue		10,649		101,134

Net income available to common shareholders		2,275		21,229

Earnings per common share
Basic			$	0.86
Diluted				0.86

($ in thousands)	As Recorded by Asheville Savings Bank			Initial Fair Value Adjustments				Measurement Period Adjustments				As Recorded by First Bancorp
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	41,824			—				—				41,824
Securities		95,020			—				—				95,020
Loans, gross		617,159			(9,631	)	(a)		—				606,180
					(1,348	)	(b)		—
Allowance for loan losses		(6,685	)		6,685		(c)		—				—
Presold mortgages		3,785			—				—				3,785
Premises and equipment		10,697			9,857		(d)		—				20,554
Core deposit intangible		—			9,760		(e)		120		(i)		9,880
Other		35,944			(5,851	)	(f)		(777	)	(j)		29,316
Total		797,744			9,472				(657	)			806,559

Liabilities
Deposits	$	678,707			430		(g)		—				679,137
Borrowings		20,000			—				—				20,000
Other		8,943			298		(h)		(822	)	(k)		8,419
Total		707,650			728				(822	)			707,556

Net identifiable assets acquired													99,003

Total cost of acquisition
Value of stock issued				$	169,299
Cash paid in the acquisition					17,939
Total cost of acquisition													187,238

Goodwill recorded related to acquisition of Asheville Savings Bank												$	88,235

	Long-Term Restricted Stock
	Number of Units			Weighted-Average Grant-Date Fair Value

Nonvested at January 1, 2018	103,063			$24.08

Granted during the period		32,027			39.10
Vested during the period		(10,626	)		17.53
Forfeited or expired during the period		(2,977	)		25.21

Nonvested at June 30, 2018		121,487		$	28.58

	Options Outstanding
	Number of Shares			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Contractual Term (years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value

Balance at January 1, 2018		38,689		$	16.09

Granted		—			—
Exercised		(29,689	)		16.61			$	659,743
Forfeited		—			—
Expired		—			—

Outstanding at June 30, 2018		9,000		$	14.35		0.9	$	239,040

Exercisable at June 30, 2018		9,000		$	14.35		0.9	$	239,040

($ in thousands)	Carolina Bank Acquisition on March 3, 2017
Contractually required payments	$	27,108
Nonaccretable difference		(4,237	)
Cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition		22,871
Accretable yield		(3,617	)
Fair value of PCI loans at acquisition date	$	19,254

($ in thousands)	Asheville Savings Bank Acquisition on October 1, 2017
Contractually required payments	$	13,424
Nonaccretable difference		(1,734	)
Cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition		11,690
Accretable yield		(1,804	)
Fair value of PCI loans at acquisition date	$	9,886

	Risk Grade	Description
Pass:
	1	Loans with virtually no risk, including cash secured loans.
	2	Loans with documented significant overall financial strength. These loans have minimum chance of loss due to the presence of multiple sources of repayment – each clearly sufficient to satisfy the obligation.
	3	Loans with documented satisfactory overall financial strength. These loans have a low loss potential due to presence of at least two clearly identified sources of repayment – each of which is sufficient to satisfy the obligation under the present circumstances.
	4	Loans to borrowers with acceptable financial condition. These loans could have signs of minor operational weaknesses, lack of adequate financial information, or loans supported by collateral with questionable value or marketability.
	5	Loans that represent above average risk due to minor weaknesses and warrant closer scrutiny by management. Collateral is generally required and felt to provide reasonable coverage with realizable liquidation values in normal circumstances. Repayment performance is satisfactory.
	P (Pass)	Consumer loans (<$500,000) that are of satisfactory credit quality with borrowers who exhibit good personal credit history, average personal financial strength and moderate debt levels. These loans generally conform to Bank policy, but may include approved mitigated exceptions to the guidelines.
Special Mention:
	6	Existing loans with defined weaknesses in primary source of repayment that, if not corrected, could cause a loss to the Bank.
Classified:
	7	An existing loan inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or the collateral pledged, if any. These loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt.
	8	Loans that have a well-defined weakness that make the collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable. Loss appears imminent, but the exact amount and timing is uncertain.
	9	Loans that are considered uncollectible and are in the process of being charged-off. This grade is a temporary grade assigned for administrative purposes until the charge-off is completed.
	F (Fail)	Consumer loans (<$500,000) with a well-defined weakness, such as exceptions of any kind with no mitigating factors, history of paying outside the terms of the note, insufficient income to support the current level of debt, etc.

($ in thousands)	For three months ended June 30, 2018						For the three months ended June 30, 2017
	Number of Contracts		Pre- Modification Restructured Balances		Post- Modification Restructured Balances		Number of Contracts		Pre- Modification Restructured Balances		Post- Modification Restructured Balances
TDRs – Accruing
Commercial, financial, and agricultural		—	$	—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans		—		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		1		18		18		—		—		—
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit		—		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		—		—		—		3		1,000		1,000
Installment loans to individuals		—		—		—		—		—		—

TDRs – Nonaccrual
Commercial, financial, and agricultural		—		—		—		1		38		25
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans		—		—		—		1		32		32
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		—		—		—		1		215		215
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit		—		—		—		—		—		—
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		—		—		—		—		—		—
Installment loans to individuals		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total TDRs arising during period		1	$	18	$	18		6	$	1,285	$	1,272

($ in thousands)	For the six months ended June 30, 2018				For the six months ended June 30, 2017
	Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts		Recorded Investment

Accruing TDRs that subsequently defaulted
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family first mortgages)		1	$	60		2	$	880
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		3		1,333		—		—

Total accruing TDRs that subsequently defaulted		4	$	1,393		2	$	880

~~($ in thousands)~~
~~Description~~	~~Fair Value at~~ ~~June 30, 2018~~	~~Valuation~~ ~~Technique~~	~~Significant Unobservable~~ ~~Inputs~~	~~General Range~~ ~~of Significant~~ ~~Unobservable~~ ~~Input Values~~
~~Impaired loans~~	~~$ 14,586~~	~~Appraised value; PV of expected cash flows~~	~~Discounts to reflect current market conditions, ultimate collectability, and estimated costs to sell~~	~~0-10%~~
~~Foreclosed real estate~~	~~8,296~~	~~Appraised value; List or contract price~~	~~Discounts to reflect current market conditions, abbreviated holding period and estimated costs to sell~~	~~0-10%~~

~~($ in thousands)~~
~~Description~~	~~Fair Value at~~ ~~December 31,~~ ~~2017~~	~~Valuation~~ ~~Technique~~	~~Significant Unobservable~~ ~~Inputs~~	~~General Range~~ ~~of Significant~~ ~~Unobservable~~ ~~Input Values~~
~~Impaired loans~~	~~$ 14,086~~	~~Appraised value; PV of expected cash flows~~	~~Discounts to reflect current market conditions, ultimate collectability, and estimated costs to sell~~	~~0-10%~~
~~Foreclosed real estate~~	~~12,571~~	~~Appraised value; List or contract price~~	~~Discounts to reflect current market conditions and estimated costs to sell~~	~~0-10%~~

	Six Months Ended June 30,
($ in thousands)	2018		2017
Net interest income, as reported	$	101,739		74,212
Tax-equivalent adjustment		723		1,278
Net interest income, tax-equivalent	$	102,462		75,490

July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018	Balance at beginning of period		Internal Growth, net			Growth from Acquisitions (1)		Balance at end of period		Total percentage growth		Internal percentage growth


Total loans	$	3,375,976		167,234			606,180		4,149,390		22.9%		5.0%

Deposits – Noninterest bearing checking		990,004		128,454			133,756		1,252,214		26.5%		13.0%
Deposits – Interest bearing checking		728,973		13,488			173,205		915,666		25.6%		1.9%
Deposits – Money market		781,086		64,635			175,938		1,021,659		30.8%		8.3%
Deposits – Savings		411,814		(34,122	)		62,783		440,475		7.0%		-8.3%
Deposits – Brokered		167,669		36,267			34,162		238,098		42.0%		21.6%
Deposits – Internet time		9,779		(2,780	)		—		6,999		-28.4%		-28.4%
Deposits – Time>$100,000		304,716		61,622			35,771		402,109		32.0%		20.2%
Deposits – Time<$100,000		250,289		(37,410	)		63,522		276,401		10.4%		-14.9%
Total deposits	$	3,644,330		230,154			679,137		4,553,621		25.0%		6.3%

January 1, 2018 to June 30, 2018
Total loans	$	4,042,369		107,021			—		4,149,390		2.6%		2.6%

Deposits – Noninterest bearing checking		1,196,161		56,053			—		1,252,214		4.7%		4.7%
Deposits – Interest bearing checking		884,254		31,412			—		915,666		3.6%		3.6%
Deposits – Money market		982,822		38,837			—		1,021,659		4.0%		4.0%
Deposits – Savings		454,860		(14,385	)		—		440,475		-3.2%		-3.2%
Deposits – Brokered		239,659		(1,561	)		—		238,098		-0.7%		-0.7%
Deposits – Internet time		7,995		(996	)		—		6,999		-12.5%		-12.5%
Deposits – Time>$100,000		347,862		54,247			—		402,109		15.6%		15.6%
Deposits – Time<$100,000		293,342		(16,941	)		—		276,401		-5.8%		-5.8%
Total deposits	$	4,406,955		146,666			—		4,553,621		3.3%		3.3%

April 1, 2018 to March 31, 2019	Balance at beginning of period		Internal Growth, net			Balance at end of period		Total percentage growth


Total loans	$	4,113,785		190,002			4,303,787		4.6%

Deposits – Noninterest bearing checking		1,227,608		162,908			1,390,516		13.3%
Deposits – Interest bearing checking		896,189		26,065			922,254		2.9%
Deposits – Money market		1,026,043		52,959			1,079,002		5.2%
Deposits – Savings		445,405		(27,593	)		417,812		-6.2%
Deposits – Brokered		251,043		(34,427	)		216,616		-13.7%
Deposits – Internet time		7,248		(3,820	)		3,428		-52.7%
Deposits – Time>$100,000		357,595		148,553			506,148		41.5%
Deposits – Time<$100,000		284,577		(23,115	)		261,462		-8.1%
Total deposits	$	4,495,708		301,530			4,797,238		6.7%

January 1, 2019 to March 31, 2019
Total loans	$	4,249,064		54,723			4,303,787		1.3%

Deposits – Noninterest bearing checking		1,320,131		70,385			1,390,516		5.3%
Deposits – Interest bearing checking		916,374		5,880			922,254		0.6%
Deposits – Money market		1,035,523		43,479			1,079,002		4.2%
Deposits – Savings		432,389		(14,577	)		417,812		-3.4%
Deposits – Brokered		239,875		(23,259	)		216,616		-9.7%
Deposits – Internet time		3,428		—			3,428		0.0%
Deposits – Time>$100,000		447,619		58,529			506,148		13.1%
Deposits – Time<$100,000		264,000		(2,538	)		261,462		-1.0%
Total deposits	$	4,659,339		137,899			4,797,238		3.0%

($ in thousands)	At June 30, 2018		At December 31, 2017		At June 30, 2017
Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	3,407		1,001		1,027
Real estate – construction, land development, and other land loans		1,374		1,822		1,007
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		11,513		12,201		15,262
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans/lines of credit		1,765		2,524		1,942
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		7,292		3,345		3,451
Installment loans to individuals		143		75		106
Total nonaccrual loans	$	25,494		20,968		22,795

($ in thousands)	At March 31, 2019		At December 31, 2018		At March 31, 2018
Commercial, financial, and agricultural	$	980		919		801
Real estate – construction, land development, and other land loans		1,677		2,265		1,766
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		9,958		10,115		12,073
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans/lines of credit		1,632		1,685		1,980
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		6,280		7,452		5,119
Installment loans to individuals		157		139		110
Total nonaccrual loans	$	20,684		22,575		21,849

($ in thousands)	Six Months Ended June 30,			Twelve Months Ended December 31,			Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2017
Loans outstanding at end of period	$	4,149,390			4,042,369			3,375,976
Average amount of loans outstanding	$	4,116,592			3,420,939			3,115,335

Allowance for loan losses, at beginning of year	$	23,298			23,781			23,781
Provision (reversal) for loan losses		(4,369	)		723			723
		18,929			24,504			24,504
Loans charged off:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural		(609	)		(1,622	)		(1,204	)
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans		(32	)		(589	)		(269	)
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		(415	)		(2,641	)		(1,247	)
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit		(186	)		(978	)		(578	)
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		(312	)		(1,182	)		(414	)
Installment loans to individuals		(262	)		(799	)		(359	)
Total charge-offs		(1,816	)		(7,811	)		(4,071	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural		812			1,311			518
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans		3,387			2,579			1,471
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		516			1,076			636
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit		243			333			130
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		1,124			1,027			698
Installment loans to individuals		103			279			139
Total recoveries		6,185			6,605			3,592
Net recoveries (charge-offs)		4,369			(1,206	)		(479	)
Allowance for loan losses, at end of period	$	23,298			23,298			24,025

Ratios:
Net charge-offs (recoveries) as a percent of average loans (annualized)		(0.21%	)		0.04%			0.03%
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans at end of period		0.56%			0.58%			0.71%
Allowance for loan losses + unaccreted discount as a percent of loans		1.16%			1.24%			1.24%

($ in thousands)	Three Months Ended March 31,			Twelve Months Ended December 31,			Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019			2018			2018
Loans outstanding at end of period	$	4,303,787			4,249,064			4,113,785
Average amount of loans outstanding	$	4,280,272			4,161,838			4,099,495

Allowance for loan losses, at beginning of year	$	21,039			23,298			23,298
Provision (reversal) for loan losses		500			(3,589	)		(3,659	)
		21,539			19,709			19,639
Loans charged off:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural		(246	)		(2,128	)		(239	)
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans		(264	)		(158	)		(2	)
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		(30	)		(1,734	)		(243	)
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit		(80	)		(711	)		(176	)
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		(836	)		(1,459	)		(41	)
Installment loans to individuals		(281	)		(781	)		(118	)
Total charge-offs		(1,737	)		(6,971	)		(819	)
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:
Commercial, financial, and agricultural		414			1,195			499
Real estate – construction, land development & other land loans		287			4,097			3,046
Real estate – mortgage – residential (1-4 family) first mortgages		160			833			145
Real estate – mortgage – home equity loans / lines of credit		128			364			153
Real estate – mortgage – commercial and other		271			1,503			582
Installment loans to individuals		33			309			53
Total recoveries		1,293			8,301			4,478
Net (charge-offs) recoveries		(444	)		1,330			3,659
Allowance for loan losses, at end of period	$	21,095			21,039			23,298

Ratios:
Net charge-offs (recoveries) as a percent of average loans (annualized)		0.04%			(0.03%	)		(0.36%	)
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of loans at end of period		0.49%			0.50%			0.57%
Allowance for loan losses + unaccreted discount on acquired loans as a percent of loans		0.86%			0.90%			1.11%

		FIRST BANCORP


	~~August 9, 2018~~May 10, 2019	BY:/s/ Richard H. Moore
		Richard H. Moore
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer),
		and Director




	~~August 9, 2018~~May 10, 2019	BY:/s/ Eric P. Credle
		Eric P. Credle
		Executive Vice President
		and Chief Financial Officer