☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to filed such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☒ No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes☒ No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes☐ No☒

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock as of August ~~12, 2019~~13, 2020 was 6,568,750 shares.

	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018			June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
(In thousands, except share amounts)	(unaudited)		(unaudited)			(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	6,378	$	4,372		$	4,870	$	5,669
Interest-bearing deposits		12,645		13,867			74,968		13,828
Federal funds sold		523		219			357		706
Total cash and cash equivalents		19,546		18,458			80,195		20,203
Securities available for sale		11,051		11,504			13,030		12,677
Securities held to maturity		7,474		7,722			5,827		6,349
Securities, restricted at cost		1,940		1,926			2,429		2,417
Securities, not readily marketable		100		100			100		100
Loans held for sale		17,904		16,345			11,625		9,894
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $1,107 and $874, respectively		253,030		234,033
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses of $2,548 and $1,408, respectively							392,221		289,671
Bank premises and equipment, net		5,551		5,607			4,987		5,200
Core deposit intangible, net		1,280		1,381			1,079		1,180
Goodwill		10,729		8,379			10,729		10,729
Other assets		7,438		6,207			7,653		6,637
Total assets	$	336,043	$	311,662		$	529,875	$	365,057

LIABILITIES
Demand deposits:
Non-interest-bearing	$	37,521	$	41,142		$	73,964	$	33,890
Interest-bearing		63,615		59,618			123,820		65,359
Time deposits		150,111		149,613			224,990		184,352
Total deposits		251,247		250,373			422,774		283,601
Borrowed funds		10,000		6,915			33,886		12,000
Subordinated notes, net of unamortized issuance costs		12,000		12,000
Subordinated notes							12,000		12,000
Deferred tax liabilities		495		534			351		194
Other liabilities		6,318		4,367			6,534		6,787
Total liabilities		280,060		274,189			475,545		314,582

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred stock 10.0% Series A non-cumulative, perpetual ($0.01 par value; 80,338 shares authorized, 80,338 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018)		1		1
Preferred stock, 9.00% fixed to floating rate Series B non-cumulative, perpetual ($0.01 par value; 1,725,000 shares authorized, 1,725,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2019, no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018)		17		-
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 6,568,750 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018)		66		66
Preferred stock, 9.00% fixed to floating rate Series B non-cumulative, perpetual ($0.01 par value; 1,725,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019)							17		17
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 6,568,750 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019)							66		66
Additional paid-in capital		47,032		31,485			39,095		39,050
Retained earnings		8,811		6,130			15,027		11,288
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		56		(209	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income							125		54
Total shareholders’ equity		55,983		37,473			54,330		50,475
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	336,043	$	311,662		$	529,875	$	365,057

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands, except per share data and share amounts)	2019		2018		2019		2018
(In thousands, except per share data and share amounts)									2020		2019		2020		2019
Interest Income
Loan, including fees	$	4,174	$	3,277	$	8,005	$	6,470	$	4,493	$	4,174	$	9,234	$	8,005
Securities		205		223		414		470		210		205		522		414
Federal funds sold		3		2		6		4		-		3		2		6
Interest-bearing deposits		84		44		149		78		19		84		80		149
Total interest income		4,466		3,546		8,574		7,022		4,722		4,466		9,838		8,574
Interest Expense
Deposits		1,198		711		2,344		1,316		1,213		1,198		2,471		2,344
Borrowed funds		284		314		574		584		246		284		487		574
Total interest expense		1,482		1,025		2,918		1,900		1,459		1,482		2,958		2,918
Net interest income		2,984		2,521		5,656		5,122		3,263		2,984		6,880		5,656
Provision for loan losses		400		77		483		321		475		400		1,263		483
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		2,584		2,444		5,173		4,801		2,788		2,584		5,617		5,173
Non-interest Income
Trust income		1,250		1,170		2,431		2,330		1,196		1,250		2,472		2,431
Gain on sale of loans										-		-		432		-
Advisory income		2,466		2,040		4,668		4,039		2,311		2,466		4,805		4,668
Brokerage income		2,894		1,897		4,956		4,314		1,790		2,894		3,861		4,956
Service fees and other income		1,096		212		2,734		2,004		1,222		1,096		2,959		2,734
Rental income		81		71		163		142		57		81		148		163
Total non-interest income		7,787		5,390		14,952		12,829		6,576		7,787		14,677		14,952
Non-interest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits		4,869		3,337		9,252		6,944		4,049		4,869		8,953		9,252
Occupancy and equipment		636		487		1,249		987		585		636		1,210		1,249
Trust expenses		499		490		976		989		372		499		927		976
Brokerage and advisory direct costs		451		323		870		788		560		451		1,046		870
Professional fees		418		191		863		369		284		418		676		863
Data processing		220		256		449		510		202		220		401		449
Other		679		619		1,309		1,228		611		679		1,273		1,309
Total non-interest expense		7,772		5,703		14,968		11,815		6,663		7,772		14,486		14,968
Income before Income Taxes		2,599		2,131		5,157		5,815		2,701		2,599		5,808		5,157
Income tax expense		407		219		771		376		587		407		1,293		771
Net Income		2,192		1,912		4,386		5,439		2,114		2,192		4,515		4,386
Preferred stock dividends		204		201		405		402		388		204		776		405
Net income available to common stockholders	$	1,988	$	1,711	$	3,981	$	5,037	$	1,726	$	1,988	$	3,739	$	3,981

Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.30	$	0.26	$	0.61	$	0.77	$	0.26	$	0.30	$	0.57	$	0.61
Diluted		0.30		0.26		0.61		0.77		0.26		0.30		0.57		0.61

Weighted average common shares outstanding		6,568,750		6,568,750		6,568,750		6,560,725		6,568,750		6,568,750		6,568,750		6,568,750
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding		6,568,750		6,568,750		6,568,750		6,560,725		6,568,750		6,568,750		6,568,750		6,568,750

	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,					Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2019		2018			2019		2018			2020		2019		2020		2019
Net Income	$	2,192	$	1,912		$	4,386	$	5,439		$	2,114	$	2,192	$	4,515	$	4,386
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities available for sale		139		(72	)		337		(265	)
Other comprehensive income:
Change in unrealized gain on investment securities available for sale												22		139		90		337
Tax effect		29		(15	)		72		(56	)		5		29		19		72
Other comprehensive income (loss)		110		(57	)		265		(209	)
Other comprehensive income												17		110		71		265
Comprehensive Income	$	2,302	$	1,855		$	4,651	$	5,230		$	2,131	$	2,302	$	4,586	$	4,651

(In thousands)	Series A Preferred Stock		Series B Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total			Series A Preferred Stock		Series B Preferred Stock		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total
Balance at January 1, 2018	$	-	$	-	$	65	$	23,074	$	1,903		$	(58	)	$	24,984
Issuance of 10.0% Series A non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock		1		-		-		8,033		-			-			8,034
Net effect of Tectonic Merger		-		-		-		28		(2,241	)		-			(2,213	)
Total shareholders’ equity at January 1, 2018, as adjusted		1		-		65		31,135		(338	)		(58	)		30,805
Issuance of 51,250 shares of common stock		-		-		1		249		-			-			250
Contributions prior to Tectonic Merger		-		-		-		-		250			-			250
Balance at January 1, 2019																		$	1	$	-	$	66	$	31,485	$	6,130		$	(209	)	$	37,473
Distributions prior to Tectonic Merger		-		-		-		-		(1,300	)		-			(1,300	)		-		-		-		-		(650	)		-			(650	)
Dividends paid on Series A preferred stock		-		-		-		-		(402	)		-			(402	)		-		-		-		-		(201	)		-			(201	)
Net income		-		-		-		-		5,439			-			5,439			-		-		-		-		2,194			-			2,194
Other comprehensive loss		-		-		-		-		-			(209	)		(209	)
Other comprehensive income																			-		-		-		-		-			155			155
Stock based compensation		-		-		-		53		-			-			53			-		-		-		24		-			-			24
Balance at June 30, 2018	$	1	$	-	$	66	$	31,437	$	3,649		$	(267	)	$	34,886

Balance at January 1, 2019	$	-	$	-	$	66	$	23,380	$	5,391		$	(209	)	$	28,628
Issuance of 10.0% Series A non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock		1		-		-		8,033		-			-			8,034
Net effect of Tectonic Merger		-		-		-		72		739			-			811
Total shareholders’ equity at January 1, 2019, as adjusted		1		-		66		31,485		6,130			(209	)		37,473
Balance at March 31, 2019																			1		-		66		31,509		7,473			(54	)		38,995
Issuance of 9.00% fixed-to-floating rate Series B non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock		-		17		-		15,489		-			-			15,506			-		17		-		15,489		-			-			15,506
Distributions prior to Tectonic Merger		-		-		-		-		(1,300	)		-			(1,300	)		-		-		-		-		(650	)		-			(650	)
Dividends paid on Series A preferred stock		-		-		-		-		(405	)		-			(405	)		-		-		-		-		(204	)		-			(204	)
Net income		-		-		-		-		4,386			-			4,386			-		-		-		-		2,192			-			2,192
Other comprehensive income		-		-		-		-		-			265			265			-		-		-		-		-			110			110
Stock based compensation		-		-		-		58		-			-			58			-		-		-		34		-			-			34
Balance at June 30, 2019	$	1	$	17	$	66	$	47,032	$	8,811		$	56		$	55,983		$	1	$	17	$	66	$	47,032	$	8,811		$	56		$	55,983

Balance at January 1, 2020																		$	-	$	17	$	66	$	39,050	$	11,288		$	54		$	50,475
Dividends paid on Series B preferred stock																			-		-		-		-		(388	)		-			(388	)
Net income																			-		-		-		-		2,401			-			2,401
Other comprehensive income																			-		-		-		-		-			54			54
Stock based compensation																			-		-		-		24		-			-			24
Balance at March 31, 2020																			-		17		66		39,074		13,301			108			52,566
Dividends paid on Series B preferred stock																			-		-		-		-		(388	)		-			(388	)
Net income																			-		-		-		-		2,114			-			2,114
Other comprehensive income																			-		-		-		-		-			17			17
Stock based compensation																			-		-		-		21		-			-			21
Balance at June 30, 2020																		$	-	$	17	$	66	$	39,095	$	15,027		$	125		$	54,330

	Six Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2019			2018			2020			2019
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income	$	4,386		$	5,439		$	4,515		$	4,386
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		483			321			1,263			483
Depreciation and amortization		317			297			253			317
Accretion of discount on loans		(6	)		(5	)		(43	)		(6	)
Core deposit intangible amortization		101			101			101			101
Securities premium amortization, net		40			32			24			40
Origination of loans held for sale		(14,413	)		(11,592	)		(15,616	)		(14,413	)
Proceeds from payments and sales of loans held for sale		186			168			6,736			186
Gain on sale of loans								(432	)		-
Stock based compensation		58			53			45			58
Deferred income taxes		(110	)		(182	)		138			(110	)
Servicing asset amortization		485			469			251			485
Net change in:
Other assets		(375	)		(916	)		(1,186	)		(375	)
Other liabilities		502			(943	)		(253	)		502
Net cash used in operating activities		(8,346	)		(6,758	)		(4,204	)		(8,346	)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Acquisition of business		(2,500	)		-			-			(2,500	)
Purchase of securities available for sale		(149,969	)		(99,995	)		(158,043	)		(149,969	)
Principal payments, calls and maturities of securities available for sale		150,737			100,319			157,771			150,737
Principal payments of securities held to maturity		230			699			507			230
Purchase of securities, restricted		(5,323	)		(4,000	)		(4,112	)		(5,323	)
Proceeds from sale of securities, restricted		5,309			3,848			4,100			5,309
Proceeds from sales of real estate owned		275			-
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned								-			275
Net change in loans		(7,082	)		(4,167	)		(96,281	)		(7,082	)
Purchases of premises and equipment		(112	)		(36	)		(29	)		(112	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(8,435	)		(3,332	)		(96,087	)		(8,435	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Net change in demand deposits		376			(4,321	)		98,535			376
Net change in time deposits		498			16,562			40,638			498
Proceeds from borrowed funds		210,559			326,848			215,119			210,559
Repayment of borrowed funds		(207,474	)		(331,860	)		(193,233	)		(207,474	)
Contributions from Tectonic Holdings members prior to Tectonic Merger		-			250
Distributions to Tectonic Holdings members prior to Tectonic Merger		(1,300	)		(1,300	)		-			(1,300	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		-			250
Proceeds from issuance of preferred shares		15,506			-
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock								-			15,506
Dividends paid on Series A preferred shares		(296	)		(402	)		-			(296	)
Dividends paid on Series B preferred shares								(776	)		-
Net cash provided by financing activities		17,869			6,027			160,283			17,869
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		1,088			(4,063	)		59,992			1,088
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		18,458			18,646			20,203			18,458
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	19,546		$	14,583		$	80,195		$	19,546

Non Cash Transactions
Transfers from loans to other real estate owned	$	275		$	-		$	-		$	275
Lease liabilities incurred in exchange for right-of-use assets	$	241		$	-		$	118		$	241
Dividends accrued on Series A preferred shares	$	109		$	-		$	-		$	109

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for
Interest	$	2,927		$	1,807		$	2,965		$	2,927
Income taxes	$	480		$	480		$	-		$	480

Tectonic Financial, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a financial holding company that offers, through its subsidiaries, banking and other financial services including trust, investment advisory, securities brokerage, third-party administration, recordkeeping and insurance services to individuals, small businesses and institutions in all 50 states. The Company was formed in October 2016 for the purpose of acquiring T Bancshares, Inc., (“TBI”), which acquisition was completed on May 15, 2017.

On May 13, 2019, we completed a merger with Tectonic Holdings, LLC (“Tectonic Holdings”), through which we expanded our financial services to include investment advisory, securities brokerage and insurance services (the “Tectonic Merger”). Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated March 28, 2019, by and between the Company and Tectonic Holdings (the “Tectonic Merger Agreement”), Tectonic Holdings merged with and into the Company, with the Company as the surviving institution. Immediately after the completion of the Tectonic Merger, the Company completed a 1-for-2 reverse stock split with respect to the outstanding shares of its common stock.

The Company consummated the initial public offering of its 9.00% Fixed-to-Float Rate Series B Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series B preferred stock”) in May 2019 (the “initial public offering”). In connection with the initial public offering, the Company issued and sold 1,725,000 shares of its Series B preferred stock, including 225,000 shares sold pursuant to the underwriters’ full exercise of their option to purchase additional shares, at an offering price of $10.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $17.25 million before deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses, and aggregate net proceeds of $15.5 million.

Following the Tectonic Merger, we operate through four main direct and indirect subsidiaries: (i) TBI, which was incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas on December 23, 2002 to serve as the bank holding company for T Bank, N.A., a national banking association (the “Bank”), (ii) Sanders Morris Harris LLC (“Sanders Morris”), a registered broker-dealer with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), and registered investment advisor with the Securities and Exchange Commission, (“SEC”), (iii) Tectonic Advisors, LLC (“Tectonic Advisors”), a registered investment advisor registered with the SEC focused generally on managing money for relatively large, affiliated institutions, and (iv) HWG Insurance Agency LLC (“HWG”), an insurance agency registered with the Texas Department of Insurance (“TDI”).

We are headquartered in Dallas, Texas. The Bank operates through a main office located at 16200 Dallas Parkway, Dallas, Texas. Our other subsidiaries operate from offices in Houston, Dallas and Plano, Texas. Our Houston office is located at 600 Travis Street, 59^th Floor, Houston, Texas, and includes the home offices of Sanders Morris and HWG, as well as Tectonic Advisors’ family office services team. Our other Dallas office, which is a branch office of Sanders Morris, is at 5950 Sherry Lane, Suite 470, Dallas, Texas. Our main office for Tectonic Advisors is in Plano at 6900 Dallas Parkway, Suite 625, Plano, Texas, and also includes a branch office of HWG.

The Bank offers a broad range of commercial and consumer banking and trust services primarily to small- to medium-sized businesses and their employees, and other institutions. The Bank’s technological capabilities, including worldwide free ATM withdrawals, sophisticated on-line banking capabilities, electronic funds transfer capabilities, and economical remote deposit solutions, allow most customers to be served regardless of their geographic location. The Bank serves its local geographic market which includes Dallas, Tarrant, Denton, Collin and Rockwall counties which encompass an area commonly referred to as the Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex. The Bank also serves the dental and other health professional industries through a centralized loan and deposit platform that operates out of its main office in Dallas, Texas. In addition, the Bank serves the small business community by offering loans guaranteed by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”).

The Bank offers a wide range of deposit services including demand deposits, regular savings accounts, money market accounts, individual retirement accounts, and certificates of deposit with fixed rates and a range of maturity options. Lending services include commercial loans to small- to medium-sized businesses and professional concerns as well as consumers. The Bank also offers ~~wealth management and~~ trust services. The Bank’s traditional fiduciary services clients primarily consist of clients of Cain Watters & Associates L.L.C. (“Cain Watters”). The Bank, Cain Watters and Tectonic Advisors entered into an advisory services agreement related to the trust operations in April 2006, which has been amended from time to time, most recently in July 2016. See Note 13, Related Parties, to these consolidated financial statements for more information.

In January 2019, the Bank acquired the assets of The Nolan Company (“Nolan”), a third-party administrator (“TPA”), based in Overland Park, Kansas. Founded in 1979, Nolan offers TPA services as a division of the Bank, and provides clients with retirement plan design and administrative services, specializing in ministerial recordkeeping, administration, actuarial and design services for retirement plans of small businesses and professional practices. Nolan has clients in 50 states and is the administrator for ~~over 800~~ retirement ~~plans, 551 of which are also clients of the Bank, which is over 54%~~plans. Approximately half of the retirement plans ~~we service in~~are serviced by our trust department. We believe that the addition of TPA services allows us to serve our clients more fully and to attract new clients to our trust platform. Please see Note 18, Nolan Acquisition ~~to these consolidated financial statements for more information.~~

The Company consummated the underwritten initial public offering of its 9.00% Fixed-to-Float Rate Series B Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (“Series B preferred stock”) in May 2019. In connection with the initial public offering, the Company issued and sold 1,725,000 shares of its Series B preferred stock, including 225,000 shares sold pursuant to the underwriters’ full exercise of their option to purchase additional shares, at an offering price of $10.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $17.25 million before deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses, and aggregate net proceeds of $15.5 million.

~~The Company has evaluated subsequent events for potential recognition and/or disclosure through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued. Please see Note 19,~~ ~~Subsequent Events~~, to these consolidated financial statements for more information.

Basis of Presentation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, TBI, the Bank, Tectonic Advisors, Sanders Morris, and through Sanders Morris, HWG. Prior to the Tectonic Merger, Sanders Morris and Tectonic Advisors were wholly owned subsidiaries of Tectonic Holdings, which was under common control with the Company. The Tectonic Merger has been accounted for as a combination of businesses under common control in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, Transactions Between Entities Under Common ~~Control~~ ~~(“Topic 805”)~~.Control. Under Topic 805, all the assets and liabilities of Tectonic Holdings are carried over to the books of the Company at their then current carrying amounts, and the consolidated financial statements, including our earnings per share calculations, have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the effect of the Tectonic Merger. This includes the acquisition of Sanders Morris, HWG and Tectonic Advisors described below under Note 2, Tectonic Merger and Initial Public Offering of Series B Preferred Stock, for all periods subsequent to May 15, 2017, the earliest date at which the entities were under common control. Therefore, the ~~balance sheet as~~consolidated statements of ~~December~~income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019, although the period falls prior to the Tectonic Merger, represents the combination of the ~~audited balance sheets~~results of operations of TFI and Tectonic Holdings. ~~The historical adjustments made to combine the audited balance sheets as of December 31, 2018 have not been audited. All~~In addition, all intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation. In addition, the computation of all share and per share amounts in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Form 10-Q”) have been adjusted retroactively to reflect the reverse stock split, which the Company completed immediately after the completion of the Tectonic Merger.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q adopted by the SEC. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, for the year ended December 31, ~~2018~~2019 in the audited financial statements included within our ~~Registration Statement~~Annual Report on Form ~~S-1, as amended~~10-K (File No ~~333-230949)~~001-38910), ~~initially~~ filed with the SEC on ~~April 18, 2019~~March 31, 2020 (“~~IPO Registration Statement”~~Form 10-K”).

In the opinion of management, all adjustments that were normal and recurring in nature, and considered necessary, have been included for the fair presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

~~Revenue Recognition.~~ ~~The Company adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update~~In December 2019, a novel coronavirus (“~~ASU”~~COVID-19”) ~~2014-09,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)~~~~, as of January 1, 2018. Topic 606 established principles for reporting information about~~was reported in China, and, in March 2020, the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from the entity’s contracts to provide goods or services to customers. The core principle requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that it expectsWorld Health Organization declared COVID-19 to be ~~entitled~~a global pandemic, indicating that almost all public commerce and related business activities must be, to ~~receive~~varying degrees, curtailed with the goal of decreasing the rate of new infections. The spread of the outbreak has caused significant disruptions in ~~exchange for those goods or services recognized as performance obligations~~the U.S. economy and has disrupted banking and other financial activity in the areas in which the Company operates.

Although the Company’s current estimates are ~~satisfied.~~based on management’s evaluation of current conditions and how we expect them to change in the future, due to the impact that the COVID-19 pandemic has had on financial markets and the economy both locally and nationally, it is reasonably possible that the COVID-19 pandemic could materially affect these significant estimates and the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. See Part II, Item 1.A. “Risk Factors” of this Form 10-Q.

The Company ~~derives a portion of~~is working with customers directly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company has been and continues to be prepared to offer short-term assistance in accordance with regulatory guidelines. Should economic conditions worsen, the Company could experience further increases in its ~~revenue from~~required allowance for loan loss and ~~investment income which are specifically excluded from the scope of this standard. Of~~record additional provision for loan loss expense. It is possible that the Company’s ~~remaining sources of income, substantially all sources of banking revenue are recognized either by transaction (ATM, interchange, wire transfer, etc.) or when~~asset quality measures could worsen at future measurement periods if the Company charges a customer for a service that has already been rendered (monthly service charges, account fees, monthly trust management fees, monthly premise rental income, etc.). Payment for such performance obligations are generally received at the time the performance obligations are satisfied. Other non-interest income primarily includes items such as gains on the sale of loans held for sale and servicing fees, none of which are subject to the requirements of Topic 606.

Revenue from contracts with customers includes fees from asset management services and commission income and fees and commissions from investment banking services. Under Topic 606, the recognition and measurement of revenue is based on the assessment of individual contract terms. Significant judgment is required to determine whether performance obligations are satisfied at a point in time or over time; how to allocate transaction prices where multiple performance obligations are identified; when to recognize revenue based on the appropriate measureeffects of the ~~Company’s progress under the related agreement; and whether constraints on variable consideration should be applied due to uncertain future events.~~COVID-19 pandemic are prolonged.

~~Investment advisory fees~~: ~~The Company provides investment advisory services on~~In addition, the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic could cause what management would deem to be a daily basis. The Company believes the performance obligation for providing advisory services is satisfied over time because the customer is receiving and consuming the benefits as they are provided by the Company. Fee arrangements are based on a percentage applied to the customer’s assets under management. Fees are received monthly or quarterly, and are recognized as revenue ratably over the period as they relate specifically to the services provided intriggering event that ~~period, which are distinct from the services provided in other periods.~~

~~Performance fees:~~ ~~The Company receives fees~~could, under certain circumstances, cause us to perform goodwill and intangible asset impairment tests and result in an impairment charge being recorded for that period. As of its agreements which vary based on specified performance measures, for example, when a separate account exceeds a specified benchmark or contractual hurdle over a contractual performance period. These performance fees may be paid in addition to standard investment advisory fees. Currently, all of the Company’s contracts of this nature specify a quarterly performance period. These fees are earned once account returns have exceeded these specified performance measures for the performance period, and are calculated as a percentage of account returns. These performance fees are considered variable consideration as the uncertainty is dependent on the value of the assets at future points in time as well as meeting a specified hurdle rate, both of which are highly susceptible to factors outside the Company’s influence. Currently, fees of this nature represent a relatively small portion of the Company’s advisory fee revenue. Revenues are recognized in the period following the conclusion of the performance period specified in the respective contract since this is the point at which the Company can concludeJune 30, 2020, we determined that ~~a significant reversal will~~such impairment tests were not ~~occur. Therefore, performance fees recognized in the current period are primarily related to performance obligations that have been satisfied in prior periods.~~

~~Other advisory fees:~~ The Company provides advisory services on an ongoing basis, which may include: operational advice, advice to management on strategic and other initiatives and/or advice on prospective mergers and acquisitions. Revenue is recognized over time for these advisory arrangements, given that under the relevant agreements, the performance obligations are simultaneously provided by the Company and consumed by the customer.

~~Brokerage commissions:~~ The Company buys and sells securities on behalf of its customers through its arrangements with its clearing firms. Each time a customer enters into a buy or sell transaction, the Company charges a commission. Commissions and clearing expenses are recorded each month based upon the trade date, which is the date that the Company fills the trade order by finding and contracting with a counterparty and confirms the trade with the customer. The Company believes that the performance obligation is satisfied on the trade date because that is when the underlying financial instrument or purchaser is identified, the pricing is agreed upon and the risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to/from the customer.

~~Syndication and private placement commissions:~~ The Company participates in the syndication of public securities offerings and in private placement offerings for business entities that want to raise funds through a sale of securities. With respect to public securities offerings, the Company may make a commitment to acquire securities from the issuer, or the Company may participate in the syndication group on a best efforts, non-committed basis. With respect to private placement offerings, the performance obligation is the consummation of the sale of securities of the issuer, typically on a “best efforts” basis. Revenues are earned from fees arising from these securities offerings, and are recognized when the performance obligation is satisfied, generally the trade date. The Company believes that the trade date is the appropriate point in time to recognize revenue for these securities transactions as there are no significant actions which the Company needs to take subsequent to this date and the issuer obtains the control and benefit of the capital markets offering at that point.necessary.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period, as well as the disclosures provided. Actual results could be significantly different from those estimates. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect the estimates. The determination of the allowance for loan losses, the fair value of stock options, the fair values of financial instruments and other real estate owned, and the status of contingencies are particularly susceptible to significant change in recorded amounts.

Accounting Changes, Reclassifications and Restatements. Certain items in prior financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. ~~In addition, as of January 1, 2019, we adopted accounting standards updates under FASB ASC Topic 842,~~ ~~Leases~~~~, primarily ASU 2016-02,~~ ~~Leases (Topic 842)~~, and subsequent updates. Among other things, these updates require lessees to recognize a lease liability, measured on a discounted basis, related to the lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising under a lease contract; and a right-of-use asset related to the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. The updates did not significantly change lease accounting requirements applicable to lessors and did not significantly impact our financial statements in relation to contracts whereby we act as a lessor. The Company leases certain office facilities and office equipment under operating leases. We elected to apply certain practical adoption expedients provided under the updates whereby we did not reassess (i) whether any expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) the lease classification for any expired leases and (iii) initial direct costs for any existing leases. In recognizing lease right-of-use assets and related lease liabilities, we account for lease and non-lease components (such as taxes, insurance, and common area maintenance costs) separately where such amounts are not included under our lease contracts. We adopted the updates using a modified-retrospective transition approach and recognized right-of-use lease assets and related lease liabilities totaling $2.2 million at the inception of the respective leases. The amounts recorded as right-of-use lease assets and lease liabilities were $1.6 million and $1.7 million, respectively, as of January 1, 2019. As of June 30, 2019, right-of-use lease assets and related lease liabilities totaled $1.3 million and $1.6 million, and are included in other assets and other liabilities on our balance sheets, respectively. See Note 5, ~~Leases~~~~, to these consolidated financial statements for more information.~~

Earnings per Share. Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed based on the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during each year. The computation of all share and per share amounts in this Form 10-Q have been adjusted retroactively to reflect the reverse stock split. Diluted ~~earnings per share~~EPS is computed using the weighted-average shares and all potential dilutive shares outstanding during the period. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted ~~earnings per share (“EPS”)~~EPS for the following periods:

	Three months ended June 30				Six months ended June 30				Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
(In thousands, except per share data)	2019		2018		2019		2018		2020		2019		2020		2019
Net income available to common shareholders	$	1,988	$	1,711	$	3,981	$	5,037	$	1,726	$	1,988	$	3,739	$	3,981
Average shares outstanding		6,569		6,569		6,569		6,561		6,569		6,569		6,569		6,569
Effect of common stock-based compensation		-		-		-		-		-		-		-		-

Average diluted shares outstanding		6,569		6,569		6,569		6,561		6,569		6,569		6,569		6,569

Basic earnings per share	$	0.30	$	0.26	$	0.61	$	0.77	$	0.26	$	0.30	$	0.57	$	0.61
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.30	$	0.26	$	0.61	$	0.77	$	0.26	$	0.30	$	0.57	$	0.61

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, options to purchase 190,000 shares of common stock, with a weighted average exercise price of ~~$2.68,~~$5.37, were excluded from the computation of diluted net ~~earnings per share~~EPS because their effect was anti-dilutive.

Note 2. Tectonic Merger and Initial Public Offering of Series B Preferred Stock

On May 13, 2019, the Company completed the Tectonic Merger pursuant to the Tectonic Merger Agreement. In the Tectonic Merger, each common unit of Tectonic Holdings outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Tectonic Merger was converted into one share of Company common stock, and each option to purchase one Tectonic Holdings common unit was converted into an option to purchase one share of Company common stock. Immediately after the completion of the Tectonic Merger, the Company completed a 1-for-2 reverse stock split, which left 6,568,750 common shares issued and outstanding as of May 14, 2019. The computation of all share and per share amounts in this Form 10-Q have been adjusted retroactively to reflect the reverse stock split.

As a condition precedent to the Tectonic Merger, immediately prior to the merger, approximately $8.0 million of Tectonic Advisors subordinated debt held by Dental Community Financial Holdings, Ltd. (“DCFH”), an entity that has as its general partner a corporation owned by one of the directors of the Company, was converted into 80,338 non-cumulative, perpetual preferred units of Tectonic Holdings (“Tectonic Holdings preferred units”).

In the Tectonic Merger, each Tectonic Holdings preferred unit was converted into one share of 10.0% Series A Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock of the Company (“Series A preferred stock”). The Series A preferred stock ranks senior to our common stock and pari passu to the Series B preferred stock (as defined below) issued in our initial public offering as to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution and/or winding up. Dividends will be paid on the Series A preferred stock only when, as and if declared by our board of directors at a rate of 10% per annum (payable quarterly). The Series A preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $100 per share. In addition, the Series A preferred stock is not convertible into any other security of the Company. The Series A preferred stock is redeemable at the option of the Company at any time after the fifth anniversary of the original issue date at a redemption price equal to the liquidation preference, plus any declared but unpaid dividends, subject to the requisite approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve (“Federal Reserve”), if any. The definitive terms of the Series A preferred stock are subject to the certificate of designation filed with our amended and restated certificate of formation.

On July 12, 2019, the Company repurchased 80,338 shares of its Series A preferred stock, representing all of the outstanding shares of the Series A preferred stock, from ~~DCFH. See Note 19,~~ ~~Subsequent Events~~~~, to these consolidated financial statements~~DCFH for ~~more information.~~an aggregate purchase price of approximately $8.0 million. The repurchase was funded using a portion of the net proceeds from the initial public offering.

The Tectonic Merger has been accounted for as a combination of businesses under common control in accordance with Topic 805. Under Topic 805, all the assets and liabilities of Tectonic Holdings are carried over to the books of the Company at their then current carrying amounts. In addition, the Company’s consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the merger with Tectonic Holdings, including the issuance of the Series A preferred stock in exchange for the Tectonic Holdings preferred units, for all prior periods during which the entities were under common control. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.

The balances shown below represent the assets and liabilities of Tectonic Holdings as of the date of the Tectonic Merger, May 13, 2019, that are reflected on the consolidated financial statements of the Company:

(In thousands)	May 13, 2019		May 13, 2019
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5,601	$	5,601
Securities, not readily marketable, at cost		100		100
Premises and equipment, net		761		761
Other assets		5,369		5,369
Total assets		11,831	$	11,831

Liabilities
Other liabilities		2,942	$	2,942
Total liabilities		2,942		2,942

Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, 10.0% Series A non-cumulative, perpetual ($0.01 par value; 80,338 shares authorized, 80,338 shares issued and outstanding at May 14, 2019		1
Preferred stock, 10.0% Series A non-cumulative, perpetual ($0.01 par value; 80,338 shares authorized, 80,338 shares issued and outstanding at May 13, 2019)				1
Additional paid-in capital		8,033		8,033
Retained earnings		855		855
Total shareholders’ equity		8,889		8,889
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	11,831	$	11,831

On May 14, 2019, the Company completed its initial public offering of 1,500,000 shares of its Series B preferred stock at a price to the public of $10.00 per share. On May 29, 2019, the underwriters exercised their option to purchase 225,000 additional shares of Series B preferred stock at the initial offering price (less underwriting discounts). The initial public offering resulted in net proceeds to ~~The~~the Company of approximately $15.5 million, net of underwriting discounts and fees. The Series B preferred stock began trading on the NASDAQ Capital Market on May 28, 2019 under the symbol “TECTP.” See our IPO Registration Statement, initially filed with the SEC on April 18, 2019.

A summary of amortized cost and cost and fair value of securities is presented below.

	June 30, 2019									June 30, 2020
(In thousands)	Amortized Cost			Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Estimated Fair Value
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government agencies	$	8,945		$	62	$	9	$	8,998	$	10,091	$	68	$	2		$	10,157
Mortgage-backed securities		2,034	��		19		-		2,053		2,781		92		-	��		2,873
Total securities available for sale	$	10,979		$	81	$	9	$	11,051	$	12,872	$	160	$	2		$	13,030

Securities held to maturity:
Property assessed clean energy	$	7,474		$	-	$	-	$	7,474	$	5,827	$	-	$	-		$	5,827
Securities, restricted:
Other	$	1,940		$	-	$	-	$	1,940	$	2,429	$	-	$	-		$	2,429

Securities not readily marketable	$	100		$	-	$	-	$	100	$	100	$	-	$	-		$	100

Securities available for sale consist of U.S. government agency securities and mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Securities held to maturity consists of Property Assessed Clean Energy investments. These investment contracts or bonds located in California and Florida, originate under a contractual obligation between the property owners, the local county administration, and a third-party administrator and sponsor. The assessments are created to fund the purchase and installation of energy saving improvements to the property such as solar panels. Generally, as a property assessment, the total assessment is repaid in installments over a period of 10 to 15 years by the then current property owner(s). Each installment is collected by the County Tax Collector where the property is located. The assessments are an obligation of the property. Securities, restricted consist of Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (“FRB”) and Federal Home Loan Bank of Dallas (“FHLB”) stock, which are carried at cost.

As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, securities available for sale with a fair value of ~~$9.6 million~~$805,000 and ~~$9.8 million, respectively, were pledged to secure borrowings at the FHLB, and securities with a fair value of $1.4 million and $1.7 million,~~$902,000, respectively, were pledged against trust deposit balances held at the Bank.

As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Bank held FRB stock in the amount of ~~$980,450~~$1.2 million and FHLB stock in the ~~amounts~~amount of ~~$959,400 and $945,900, respectively.~~$1.2 million, all of which was classified as restricted securities.

As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company held an income interest in a private investment, which is not readily marketable, accounted for under the cost method in the amount of $100,000.

The table below indicates the length of time individual investment securities have been in a continuous loss position as of June 30, ~~2019:~~2020:

	Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total				Less than 12 months				12 months or longer				Total
(In thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. government agencies	$	-	$	-	$	2,253	$	9	$	2,253	$	9	$	2,000	$	2	$	-	$	-	$	2,000	$	2
Total	$	-	$	-	$	2,253	$	9	$	2,253	$	9

The number of investment positions in this unrealized loss position totaled ~~three~~one as of June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. The Company does not believe these unrealized losses are “other than temporary” as (i) it does not have the intent to sell the securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and, (ii) it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell the securities prior to recovery and/or maturity. Accordingly, as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, no impairment loss has been realized in the Company’s consolidated statements of income.

In making this determination, the Company also considers the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than cost and the financial condition of the issuer. Any unrealized losses are largely due to increases in market interest rates over the yields available at the time the underlying securities were purchased. The unrealized losses noted are primarily interest rate related due to the level of interest rates as of June 30, 2019, compared to the time of purchase. The Company has reviewed the ratings of the issuers and has not identified any issues related to the ultimate repayment of principal as a result of credit concerns on these securities. The Company’s mortgage related securities are backed by the Government National Mortgage Association and the Federal National Mortgage Association, or are collateralized by securities backed by these agencies. Management believes the fair value is expected to recover as the securities approach their maturity date or repricing date or if market yields for such investments decline.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities atas of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 are presented below by contractual maturity. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. Residential mortgage backed securities are shown separately since they are not due at a single maturity date.

(In thousands)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Commercial and industrial	$	89,075	$	88,915	$	86,311	$	85,476
Consumer installment		3,768		3,636		5,717		3,409
Real estate – residential		5,383		7,488		4,999		5,232
Real estate – commercial		38,500		35,221		50,082		46,981
Real estate – construction and land		6,735		4,653		10,160		7,865
SBA:
SBA 7(a) guaranteed		43,951		33,884		165,476		69,963
SBA 7(a) unguaranteed		45,014		44,326		46,778		47,132
SBA 504		19,260		13,400		24,446		22,591
USDA		2,448		3,367		799		2,430
Other		3		17		1		-
Gross Loans		254,137		234,907		394,769		291,079
Less:
Allowance for loan losses		1,107		874		2,548		1,408
Net loans	$	253,030	$	234,033	$	392,221	$	289,671

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was signed by the President of the United States, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which established the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). The PPP is administered by the SBA with support from the Department of the Treasury. The PPP is a federally-guaranteed, low-interest rate loan program that is designed to provide a direct incentive for small businesses to keep workers on the payroll. Businesses may use PPP loan funds to pay up to twenty-four weeks of payroll costs as well as to cover other eligible business expenses. PPP loans may be partially or fully forgiven by the SBA if the funds are used for eligible expenses during the relevant forgiveness period and the borrower meets the employee retention criteria. PPP loans will carry an interest rate of 1.00% to be paid either by the SBA in the event of forgiveness or by the borrower for the term of the loan, which may be two or five years. PPP loans that the SBA approved on or after June 5, 2020 will have a maturity date of five years. Payments for PPP loans are deferred until the SBA issues a forgiveness decision or ten months after the end of the forgiveness period if the borrower fails to apply for forgiveness. Included in SBA 7(a) guaranteed loans at June 30, 2020, were $98.3 million of loans originated in the PPP. As mentioned above, the PPP loans may be forgiven by the SBA and are 100 percent guaranteed by the SBA. Therefore, no allowance for loan losses is allocated to PPP loans.

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, our loan portfolio included ~~$75.6~~$72.4 million of loans, approximately ~~29.8%~~18.3% of our total funded loans and 24.4% of total funded loans, net of the SBA PPP loans of $98.3 million, to the dental industry. The Bank believes that these loans are to credit worthy borrowers and are diversified geographically.

The Company serves the small business community by offering loans promulgated under the SBA’s 7(a) and 504 loan programs, and loans guaranteed by the USDA. SBA 7(a) and USDA loans are typically guaranteed by each agency in amounts ranging from 75% to 80% of the principal balance. For SBA construction loans, the Company records the guaranteed funded portion of the loans as held for sale. When the SBA loans are fully funded, the Company may sell the guaranteed portion into the secondary market, on a servicing-retained basis, or reclassify from loans held for sale to loans held for investment if the Company determines that holding these loans provide better long-term risk adjusted returns than selling the loans. In calculating gain on the sale of loans, the Company performs an allocation based on the relative fair values of the sold portion and retained portion of the loan. The Company’s assumptions are validated by reference to external market information.

The Company had ~~$17.9~~$11.6 million and ~~$16.3~~$9.9 million of SBA loans held for sale as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. During the ~~three and~~ six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company sold $6.2 million of SBA loans, resulting in a gain on sale of loans of $432,000. The Company did not sell any ~~SBA loans.~~loans during the three months ended June 30, 2020. The Company elected to reclassify ~~$7.0~~$5.8 and $7.5 million ~~and $12.7 million, respectively,~~ of the SBA 7(a) loans held for sale to loans held for investment during the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019.~~2020, respectively.

The Company maintains written loan origination policies, procedures, and processes which address credit quality at several levels including individual loan level, loan type, and loan portfolio levels.

Commercial and industrial loans, which are predominantly loans to dentists, are underwritten based on historical and projected income of the business and individual borrowers and guarantors. The Company utilizes a comprehensive global debt service coverage analysis to determine debt service coverage ratios. This analysis compares global cash flow of the borrowers and guarantors on an individual credit to existing and proposed debt after consideration of personal and business related other expenses. Collateral is generally a lien on all available assets of the business borrower including intangible assets. Credit worthiness of individual borrowers and guarantors is established through the use of credit reports and credit scores.

Consumer loans are evaluated on the basis of credit worthiness as established through the use of credit reports and credit scores. Additional credit quality indicators include borrower debt to income ratios based on verifiable income sources.

Real estate mortgage loans are evaluated based on collateral value as well as global debt service coverage ratios based on historical and projected income from all related sources including the collateral property, the borrower, and all guarantors where applicable.

The Company originates SBA loans which are sometimes sold into the secondary market. The Company continues to service these loans after sale and is required under the SBA programs to retain specified amounts. The two primary SBA loan programs that the Company offers are the basic 7(a) loan guaranty program and the 504 loan program in conjunction with junior lien financing from a Certified Development Company (“CDC”).

The 7(a) program serves as the SBA’s primary business loan program to help qualified small businesses obtain financing when they might not be eligible for business loans through normal lending channels. Loan proceeds under this program can be used for most business purposes including working capital, machinery and equipment, furniture and fixtures, land and building (including purchase, renovation and new construction), leasehold improvements and debt refinancing. Loan maturity is generally up to 10 years for non-real estate collateral and up to 25 years for real estate collateral. The 7(a) loan is approved and funded by a qualified lender, partially guaranteed by the SBA and subject to applicable regulations. In general, the SBA guarantees up to 75% of the loan amount depending on loan size. The Company is required by the SBA to service the loan and retain a contractual minimum of 5% on all SBA 7(a) loans, but generally retains 25% (the unguaranteed portion). The servicing spread is 1% of the guaranteed portion of the loan that is sold in the secondary market. Included in the 7(a) loans reflected in this Form 10-Q are the PPP loans originated by the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2020.

The 504 program is an economic development-financing program providing long-term, low down payment loans to businesses. Typically, a 504 project includes a loan secured from a private-sector lender with a senior lien, a loan secured from a CDC (funded by a 100% SBA-guaranteed debenture) with a junior lien covering up to 40% of the total cost, and a contribution of at least 10% equity from the borrower. Debenture limits are $5.0 million for regular 504 loans and $5.5 million for those 504 loans that meet a public policy goal.

The SBA has designated the Bank as a “Preferred Lender”. As a Preferred Lender, the Bank has been delegated loan approval, closing and most servicing and liquidation authority from the SBA.

The Company also offers Business & Industry (“B&I”) program loans through the USDA. These loans are similar to the SBA product, except they are guaranteed by the USDA. The guaranteed amount is generally 80%. B&I loans are made to businesses in designated rural areas and are generally larger loans to larger businesses than the SBA 7(a) loans. Similar to the SBA 7(a) product, they can be sold into the secondary market. These loans can be utilized for rural commercial real estate and equipment. The loans can have maturities up to 30 years and the rates can be fixed or variable.

Construction and land development loans are evaluated based on the borrower’s and guarantor’s credit worthiness, past experience in the industry, track record and experience with the type of project being considered, and other factors. Collateral value is determined generally by independent appraisal utilizing multiple approaches to determine value based on property type.

For all loan types, the Company establishes guidelines for its underwriting criteria including collateral coverage ratios, global debt service coverage ratios, and maximum amortization or loan maturity terms.

At the portfolio level, the Company monitors concentrations of loans based on several criteria including loan type, collateral type, industry, geography, and other factors. The Company also performs periodic market research and economic analysis at a local geographic and national level. Based on this research, the Company may from time to time change the minimum or benchmark underwriting criteria applied to the above loan types.

Loans are placed on non-accrual status when, in management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet payment obligations as they become due, as well as when required by regulatory provisions. Loans may be placed on non-accrual status regardless of whether or not such loans are considered past due. When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest is reversed. A loan may be returned to accrual status when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future principal and interest amounts contractually due are reasonably assured, which is typically evidenced by a sustained period of repayment performance by the borrower.

The restructuring of a loan is considered a “troubled debt restructuring” if due to the borrower’s financial difficulties, the Company has granted a concession that the Company would not otherwise consider. This may include a transfer of real estate or other assets from the borrower, a modification of loan terms, or a combination of the two. Modification of loan terms may include interest rate reductions or below market interest rates, principal forgiveness, restructuring amortization schedules, reductions in collateral and other actions intended to minimize potential losses.

The provisions of the CARES Act include an election to suspend accounting for troubled debt restructurings in certain circumstances, such as extensions or deferrals, related to the COVID-19 pandemic made between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of (i) December 31, 2020 or (ii) the date that is 60 days after the date on which the national emergency concerning the COVID-19 pandemic declared under the National Emergencies Act terminates. The relief can only be applied to modifications for borrowers that were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. The Company elected to adopt these provisions of the CARES Act. As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020, there were modifications made to 139 loans with a total outstanding balance of $92.8 million, or 23.7% of the total loan portfolio. The modifications primarily included a delay of principal and/or interest payments for three months. These loans continue to accrue interest and are evaluated for past due status based on the revised payment terms. Under the applicable guidance, none of these loans were considered restructured as of June 30, 2020.

As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, there were no loans identified as troubled debt restructurings. There were no new troubled debt restructurings during the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and the year ended December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement, including scheduled principal and interest payments. If a loan is impaired, a specific valuation allowance is allocated, if necessary, so that the loan is reported net, at the present value of estimated future cash flows using the loan’s existing rate or at the fair value of collateral if repayment is expected solely from the collateral. Interest payments on impaired loans are typically applied to principal unless collectability of the principal amount is reasonably assured, in which case interest is recognized on a cash basis. Impaired loans, or portions thereof, are charged off when deemed uncollectible.

The Company’s impaired loans and related allowance is summarized in the following table:

Loans are considered past due if the required principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments were due. The Company’s past due loans are as follows:

											Total 90
	30-89 Days		90 Days or		Total		Total		Total		Days Past Due		30-89 Days		90 Days or More		Total		Total		Total		Total 90 Days Past Due
(In thousands)	Past Due		More Past Due		Past Due		Current		Loans		Still Accruing		Past Due		Past Due		Past Due		Current		Loans		Still Accruing
June 30, 2019
June 30, 2020
Commercial and industrial	$	144	$	225	$	369	$	88,706	$	89,075	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	86,311	$	86,311	$	-
Consumer installment		-		-		-		3,768		3,768		-		-		-		-		5,717		5,717		-
Real estate – residential		-		-		-		5,383		5,383		-		-		-		-		4,999		4,999		-
Real estate – commercial		-		-		-		38,500		38,500		-		-		87		87		49,995		50,082		-
Real estate – construction and land		-		-		-		6,735		6,735		-		-		-		-		10,160		10,160		-
SBA		955		3,480		4,435		103,790		108,225		-		-		1,693		1,693		235,007		236,700		-
USDA		-		-		-		2,448		2,448		-		-		-		-		799		799		-
Other		-		-		-		3		3		-		-		-		-		1		1		-
Total	$	1,099	$	3,705	$	4,804	$	249,333	$	254,137	$	-	$	-	$	1,780	$	1,780	$	392,989	$	394,769	$	-

December 31, 2018
December 31, 2019
Commercial and industrial	$	614	$	-	$	614	$	88,301	$	88,915	$	-	$	571	$	-	$	571	$	84,905	$	85,476	$	-
Consumer installment		-		-		-		3,636		3,636		-		-		-		-		3,409		3,409		-
Real estate – residential		-		-		-		7,488		7,488		-		-		-		-		5,232		5,232		-
Real estate – commercial		-		-		-		35,221		35,221		-		521		-		521		46,460		46,981		-
Real estate – construction and land		-		-		-		4,653		4,653		-		-		-		-		7,865		7,865		-
SBA		1,431		1,114		2,545		89,065		91,610		-		-		5,931		5,931		133,755		139,686		-
USDA		-		-		-		3,367		3,367		-		-		-		-		2,430		2,430		-
Other		-		-		-		17		17		-		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	2,045	$	1,114	$	3,159	$	231,748	$	234,907	$	-	$	1,092	$	5,931	$	7,023	$	284,056	$	291,079	$	-

As part of the on-going monitoring of the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio, management tracks certain credit quality indicators including internal credit risk based on past experiences as well as external statistics and factors. Loans are graded in one of six categories: (i) pass, (ii) pass-watch, (iii) special mention, (iv) substandard, (v) doubtful, or (vi) loss. Loans graded as loss are charged-off.

The classifications of loans reflect a judgment about the risks of default and loss associated with the loan. The Company reviews the ratings on credits quarterly. No significant changes were made to the loan risk grading system definitions and allowance for loan loss methodology during the past year. Ratings are adjusted to reflect the degree of risk and loss that is felt to be inherent in each credit. The Company’s methodology is structured so that specific allocations are increased in accordance with deterioration in credit quality (and a corresponding increase in risk and loss) or decreased in accordance with improvement in credit quality (and a corresponding decrease in risk and loss).

Credits rated pass are acceptable loans, appropriately underwritten, bearing an ordinary risk of loss to the Company. Loans in this category are loans to highly credit worthy borrowers with financial statements presenting a good primary source as well as an adequate secondary source of repayment.

Credits rated pass-watch loans have been determined to require enhanced monitoring for potential weaknesses which require further investigation. They have no significant delinquency in the past twelve months. This rating causes the loan to be actively monitored with greater frequency than pass loans and allows appropriate downgrade transition if verifiable adverse events are confirmed. This category may also include loans that have improved in credit quality from special mention but are not yet considered pass loans.

Credits rated special mention show clear signs of financial weaknesses or deterioration in credit worthiness; however, such concerns are not so pronounced that the Company generally expects to experience significant loss within the short-term. Such credits typically maintain the ability to perform within standard credit terms and credit exposure is not as prominent as credits rated more harshly.

Credits rated substandard are those in which the normal repayment of principal and interest may be, or has been, jeopardized by reason of adverse trends or developments of a financial, managerial, economic or political nature, or important weaknesses exist in collateral. A protracted workout on these credits is a distinct possibility. Prompt corrective action is therefore required to strengthen the Company’s position, and/or to reduce exposure and to assure that adequate remedial measures are taken by the borrower. Credit exposure becomes more likely in such credits and a serious evaluation of the secondary support to the credit is performed. Guaranteed portions of SBA loans graded substandard are generally on non-accrual due to the limited amount of interest covered by the guarantee, usually 60 days maximum. However, there typically will be no exposure to loss on the principal amount of these guaranteed portions of the loan.

Credits rated doubtful are those in which full collection of principal appears highly questionable, and which some degree of loss is anticipated, even though the ultimate amount of loss may not yet be certain and/or other factors exist which could affect collection of debt. Based upon available information, positive action by the Company is required to avert or minimize loss.

Loans classified loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this asset even though partial recovery may be affected in the future.

The following table summarizes the Company’s internal ratings of its loans as of the dates indicated:

			Pass-		Special										Pass-		Special
(In thousands)	Pass		Watch		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total		Pass		Watch		Mention		Substandard		Doubtful		Total
June 30, 2019
June 30, 2020
Commercial and industrial	$	88,212	$	636	$	-	$	227	$	-	$	89,075	$	85,637	$	515	$	-	$	159	$	-	$	86,311
Consumer installment		3,768		-		-		-		-		3,768		5,717		-		-		-		-		5,717
Real estate – residential		5,383		-		-		-		-		5,383		4,999		-		-		-		-		4,999
Real estate – commercial		38,500		-		-		-		-		38,500		49,918		-		-		164		-		50,082
Real estate – construction and land		6,735		-		-		-		-		6,735		10,160		-		-		-		-		10,160
SBA		96,208		9,469		909		1,639		-		108,225		229,037		3,948		2,689		1,026		-		236,700
USDA		2,448		-		-		-		-		2,448		799		-		-		-		-		799
Other		3		-		-		-		-		3		1		-		-		-		-		1
Total	$	241,257	$	10,105	$	909	$	1,866	$	-	$	254,137	$	386,268	$	4,463	$	2,689	$	1,349	$	-	$	394,769

December 31, 2018
December 31, 2019
Commercial and industrial	$	88,879	$	-	$	-	$	36	$	-	$	88,915	$	84,838	$	578	$	-	$	60	$	-	$	85,476
Consumer installment		3,636		-		-		-		-		3,636		3,409		-		-		-		-		3,409
Real estate – residential		7,488		-		-		-		-		7,488		5,232		-		-		-		-		5,232
Real estate – commercial		35,221		-		-		-		-		35,221		46,981		-		-		-		-		46,981
Real estate – construction and land		4,653		-		-		-		-		4,653		7,865		-		-		-		-		7,865
SBA		84,192		7,125		-		293		-		91,610		127,004		9,506		2,137		1,039		-		139,686
USDA		3,367		-		-		-		-		3,367		2,430		-		-		-		-		2,430
Other		17		-		-		-		-		17		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	227,453	$	7,125	$	-	$	329	$	-	$	234,907	$	277,759	$	10,084	$	2,137	$	1,099	$	-	$	291,079

The activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 is presented below. Management has evaluated the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses by estimating the losses in various categories of the loan portfolio.

(In thousands)	Commercial and Industrial		Consumer Installment			Real Estate Residential		Real Estate Commercial		Real Estate Construction and Land			SBA			USDA		Other		Total			Commercial and Industrial		Consumer Installment			Real Estate Residential		Real Estate Commercial		Real Estate Construction and Land		SBA			USDA		Other		Total
Three months ended:
June 30, 2019
Beginning balance	$	423	$	27		$	20	$	225	$	38		$	206		$	-	$	-	$	939
June 30, 2020
Beginning Balance																							$	955	$	75		$	43	$	575	$	138	$	435		$	-	$	-	$	2,221
Provision for loan losses		41		(1	)		8		43		16			293			-		-		400			144		15			15		112		41		148			-		-		475
Charge-offs		-		-			-		-		-			(248	)		-		-		(248	)		-		-			-		-		-		(149	)		-		-		(149	)
Recoveries		-		-			-		-		-			16			-		-		16			-		-			-		-		-		1			-		-		1
Net charge-offs		-		-			-		-		-			(232	)		-		-		(232	)		-		-			-		-		-		(148	)		-		-		(148	)
Ending balance	$	464	$	26		$	28	$	268	$	54		$	267		$	-	$	-	$	1,107		$	1,099	$	90		$	58	$	687	$	179	$	435		$	-	$	-	$	2,548
June 30, 2018
Beginning balance	$	298	$	31		$	18	$	93	$	35		$	88		$	-	$	-	$	563

June 30. 2019
Beginning Balance																							$	423	$	27		$	20	$	225	$	38	$	206		$	-	$	-	$	939
Provision for loan losses		21		(2	)		5		44		(8	)		17			-		-		77			41		(1	)		8		43		16		293			-		-		400
Charge-offs		-		-			-		-		-			-			-		-		-			-		-			-		-		-		(248	)		-		-		(248	)
Recoveries		-		-			-		-		-			3			-		-		3			-		-			-		-		-		16			-		-		16
Net recoveries		-		-			-		-		-			3			-		-		3
Net charge-offs																								-		-			-		-		-		(232	)		-		-		(232	)
Ending balance	$	319	$	29		$	23	$	137	$	27		$	108		$	-	$	-	$	643		$	464	$	26		$	28	$	268	$	54	$	267		$	-	$	-	$	1,107

The Company’s allowance for loan losses as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 by portfolio segment and detailed on the basis of the Company’s impairment methodology was as follows:

(In thousands)	Commercial and Industrial		Consumer Installment		Real Estate Residential		Real Estate Commercial		Real Estate Construction and Land		SBA		USDA		Other		Total		Commercial and Industrial		Consumer Installment		Real Estate Residential		Real Estate Commercial		Real Estate Construction and Land		SBA		USDA		Other		Total
June 30, 2019
June 30, 2020
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		464		26		28		268		54		267		-		-		1,107		1,099		90		58		687		179		435		-		-		2,548
Ending balance	$	464	$	26	$	28	$	268	$	54	$	267	$	-	$	-	$	1,107	$	1,099	$	90	$	58	$	687	$	179	$	435	$	-	$	-	$	2,548

December 31, 2018
December 31, 2019
Loans individually evaluated for impairment	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment		419		27		27		210		34		157		-		-		874		501		27		22		347		76		435		-		-		1,408
Ending balance	$	419	$	27	$	27	$	210	$	34	$	157	$	-	$	-	$	874	$	501	$	27	$	22	$	347	$	76	$	435	$	-	$	-	$	1,408

The Company’s recorded investment in loans as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 related to each balance in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and detailed on the basis of the Company’s impairment methodology was as follows:

The Company leases certain office facilities and office equipment under operating leases. Certain of the leases contain provisions for renewal options, escalation clauses based on increases in certain costs incurred by the lessor, as well as free rent periods and tenant improvement allowances. The Company amortizes office lease incentives and rent escalations on a straight-line basis over the life of the respective leases. The Company has obligations under operating leases that expire between 2020 and 2024 with initial non-cancellable terms in excess of one year.

On January 1, 2019, we adopted a new accounting standard which required the recognition of our operating leases on our balance sheet, under right-of-use assets and corresponding lease liabilities. See Note 1, Organization and Significant Accounting Policies, to these consolidated financial statements for more information. The right-of-use assets represent our right to utilize the underlying asset during the lease term, while the lease liability represents the obligation to make periodic lease payments over the life of the lease. As of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, right-of-use assets totaled $898,000 and $1.2 million, respectively, and are reported as other assets on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet. The related lease liabilities totaled ~~$1.3~~$1.0 million and ~~$1.6~~$1.4 million, respectively, and are reported in other ~~assets and other~~ liabilities ~~respectively,~~ on our accompanying consolidated balance sheet. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the weighted average remaining lease term is two years, and the weighted average discount rate is ~~4.62%~~4.63%.

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the minimum rental commitments under these noncancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):

2019	$	386
2020		760		$	377
2021		413			429
2022		159			175
2023 and thereafter		97
2023					76
2024 and thereafter					7
Total minimum rental payments		1,815			1,064

Less: Minimum sublease rentals		(10	)		(63	)
Net minimum rental payments		1,805			1,001
Less: Interest		(224	)		14
Present value of lease liabilities	$	1,581		$	1,015

The Company currently receives rental income from seven tenants in its headquarters building for office space the Company does not occupy. Aggregate future minimum rentals to be received under non-cancelable leases as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 were ~~$1.3~~$1.1 million through 2027.

(In thousands)

June 30, 2019

December 31, 2018

June 30,

2020

December 31,

2019

Goodwill

10,729

8,379

10,729

Core deposit intangible

1,280

1,381

1,079

1,180

The Company recorded goodwill of $2.4 million during the first quarter of 2019 in connection with the acquisition of the assets of Nolan. Please see Note 18, Nolan Acquisition, to these consolidated financial statements for more information.

Core deposit intangible is amortized on a straight line basis over the initial estimated lives of the deposits, which range from five to ~~twelve~~eight years. The core deposit intangible amortization totaled $50,000 for the three months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, and $101,000 for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

The carrying basis and accumulated amortization of the core deposit intangible as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 were as follows:

(In thousands)	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			June 30, 2020			December 31, 2019
Gross carrying basis	$	1,708		$	1,708		$	1,708		$	1,708
Accumulated amortization		(428	)		(327	)		(629	)		(528	)
Net carrying amount	$	1,280		$	1,381		$	1,079		$	1,180

The estimated amortization expense of the core deposit intangible ~~for each~~remaining as of ~~the following five years~~June 30, 2020 is as follows:

(In thousands)
Remainder 2019	$	100
2020		201
2020 remaining			$	101
2021		201		201
2022		208		208
2023		210		210
2024				210
Thereafter		360		149
Total	$	1,280	$	1,079

Time deposits of $250,000 and over totaled ~~$33.2~~$63.1 million and ~~$31.6~~$37.4 million as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 the scheduled maturities of time deposits were as follows:

(In thousands)
2019	$	59,439
2020		62,013	$	84,587
2021		19,564		82,511
2022		6,233		30,474
2023		108		15,561
2024		2,754		6,104
Thereafter				5,753
Total	$	150,111	$	224,990

The aggregate amount of demand deposit overdrafts that have been reclassified as loans as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 was insignificant.

~~The Company’s FHLB borrowed funds were $10.0 million and $5.0 million as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.~~ The Company has a blanket lien credit line with the FHLB with borrowing capacity of ~~$32.7~~$38.5 million secured by commercial ~~loans and securities with collateral values of $23.3 million and $9.4 million, respectively.~~loans. The Company determines its borrowing needs and utilizes overnight advance accordingly at varying terms. AtThe Company had no borrowings with FHLB as of June 30, 2020. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $12.0 million in borrowings with FHLB, which consisted of an overnight advance of ~~$5.0~~$2.0 million with an interest rate of ~~2.68%. The Company also had~~1.45%, and a ~~$5.0~~$10.0 million ~~three month~~six-month fixed term advance with an interest rate of ~~2.54%~~2.18% and maturity date of ~~July 25, 2019.~~January 27, 2020. At maturity, the term advance was rolled into the overnight advance and subsequently paid off.

The Company also has a credit line with the FRB with borrowing capacity of ~~$18.2~~$30.3 million, which is secured by commercial loans. The Company had no borrowings from the FRB at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~

2019. As part of ~~December 31, 2018,~~ the ~~Company had~~CARES Act, the FRB offered secured discounted borrowings to banks who originated PPP loans through the Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility (“PPPLF”). At June 30, 2020, the Bank pledged $33.8 million of PPP loans to the FRB under the PPPLF to borrow $33.8 million of funds at a ~~$1.9 million bank stock loan with a variable interest~~ rate of ~~prime plus 0.75% and maturity date of May 11, 2028. Principal and interest payments~~0.35%, with maturities ranging from April 2022 through June 2022. PPP loans pledged as collateral for the PPPLF are ~~due quarterly. The Company paid off~~excluded from the ~~loan on May 31, 2019.~~average assets used in the Company’s leverage ratio calculation.

As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company also had subordinated notes totaling $12.0 million, consisting of $8.0 million issued in 2017 bearing an interest rate of 7.125% payable semi-annually and maturing on July 20, 2027, and $4.0 million issued in 2018 bearing an interest rate of 7.125% payable semi-annually and maturing on March 31, 2028. The subordinated notes are unsecured and subordinated in right of payment to the payment of our existing and future senior indebtedness and structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness of our subsidiaries.

The Company funds certain costs for medical benefits in amounts determined at the discretion of management. The Company has a retirement savings 401(k) plan covering substantially all employees of the Bank, and a second plan covering substantially all employees of Sanders Morris, Tectonic Advisors and ~~Tectonic Advisors.~~the Company.

Under the 401(k) plan covering the Bank’s employees, ~~an employee may contribute up to 6% of his or her annual compensation with~~ the Company ~~matching~~matches 100% of the employee’s contribution on the first 1% of the employee’s compensation, and 50% of the employee’s contribution on the next 5% of the employee’s compensation.

Under the safe harbor provision of the 401(k) plan adopted by ~~both~~ Sanders Morris, ~~and~~ Tectonic Advisors ~~under~~and the ~~safe harbor provision adopted by the plan,~~Company, the relevant employer is required to contribute 3% of eligible wages to the plan, up to the maximum amount under Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) guidance, regardless of the level of the employee’s contributions. An eligible employee may contribute up to the annual maximum contribution allowed for a given year under IRS guidance. At its discretion, the Company may also make additional annual contributions to the plan. Any discretionary contributions are allocated to employees in the proportion of employee contributions to the total contributions of all participants in the plan. No discretionary contributions were made during the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and 2018. Through November 30, 2018, contributions to the plan were invested as directed by the Trustees of the Plan. Effective December 1, 2018, the Plan was converted from a trustee directed plan to participant direction. Subsequent to this date, contributions to the plan are invested as directed by the respective plan participant.2019.

The amount of employer contributions charged to expense under the two plans was $101,000 and $224,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, and $87,000 and $174,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, and ~~$77,000 and $175,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and~~ is included in salaries and employee benefits on the consolidated statements of income. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, $149,000 and $71,000, respectively, was accrued as payable to the plan adopted by both Sanders Morris and Tectonic Advisors, and is included in other liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. There was no accrual payable to the ~~plan covering the Bank’s employees~~plans as of June 30, ~~2019 or~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

Income tax expense was $587,000 and $1.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively and $407,000 and $771,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, ~~respectively,~~respectively. The Company’s effective income tax rate was 21.7% and ~~$219,000 and $376,000~~22.3% for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018, respectively. The Company’s effective income tax rate was 15.6% and 15.0% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019,~~2020, respectively, compared to ~~10.3%~~15.7% and ~~6.5%~~15.0% for the same periods in the prior year, respectively. The effective income tax rate differed materially from the U.S. statutory rate of 21% for the three and months ended June 30, 2019 due to Tectonic ~~Advisors~~Advisor’s and Sanders Morris tax status as a partnership for the periods prior to May 13, 2019, the date the Tectonic Merger was completed.

Net deferred tax liabilities totaled ~~$495,000~~$351,000 and ~~$534,000~~$194,000 at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

The board of directors and shareholders adopted the Tectonic Financial, Inc. 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (“Plan”) in May 2017 in connection with the Company’s acquisition of TBI. The Plan was amended and restated by the Company and its shareholders effective March 27, 2019 in connection with the Company’s initial public offering. The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board and authorizes the granting of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units to employees, directors and consultants in order to promote the success of the Company’s business. Incentive stock options may be granted only to employees of the Company, or a parent or subsidiary of the Company. The Company reserved 750,000 authorized shares of common stock for the Plan. The term of each stock option is no longer than 10 years from the date of the grant.

The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation plans using the fair value-based method of accounting. The fair value of each stock option award is estimated on the date of grant by a third party using a closed form option valuation (Black-Scholes) model.

No stock options or other equity awards were granted under the Plan during the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 or 2018, except for the conversion of each option to purchase one Tectonic Holdings common unit to an option to purchase one share of the Company common stock in connection with the Tectonic Merger, resulting in 190,000 options outstanding.2019.

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, there were 50,000 stock options outstanding that ~~vest~~vested on May 15, 2020, the third anniversary of the grant date, ~~May 15, 2020, and~~for which compensation has been fully recognized. In addition, there were 140,000 stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2020 that vest on May 15, 2021, the fourth anniversary of the grant ~~date, May 15, 2021.~~date. The Company is recording compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods. The Company recorded salaries and employee benefits expense on our consolidated statements of income in connection with the Plan of $21,000 and $45,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, and $34,000 and $58,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, ~~respectively, and $24,000 and $53,000~~respectively. As of June 30, 2020, there was $58,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost.

There were no grants, forfeitures, or exercises in the Plan for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018, respectively. As~~2020 and 2019. The number of shares outstanding and the weighted average exercise price as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 ~~there~~ was ~~$154,000~~190,000 and $5.37. The weighted average contractual life as of ~~total unrecognized compensation cost.~~June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 was 6.87 years and 7.37 years, respectively.

~~There was no activity in the Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2018. The following is a summary of activity in the Plan for the six months ended June 30, 2019:~~

~~(a)~~ Stock options outstanding at the end of the period had immaterial aggregate intrinsic values.

The weighted-average grant date fair value of the options as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~December 31, 2019 was $1.94. Under Topic 805, the grant date fair value has been restated as though the Tectonic Merger had occurred upon the date at which the entities came under common control.

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the accompanying balance sheets. The Company's exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

(In thousands)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019
Undisbursed loan commitments	$	23,480	$	14,812	$	27,255	$	31,589
Standby letters of credit		162		162		172		172
	$	23,642	$	14,974	$	27,427	$	31,761

The Company is involved in various regulatory inspections, inquiries, investigations and proceedings, and litigation matters that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of business. The process of resolving matters through litigation or other means is inherently uncertain, and it is possible that an unfavorable resolution of these matters, will adversely affect the Company, its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. The Company’s regular practice is to expense legal fees as services are rendered in connection with legal matters, and to accrue for liabilities when payment is probable.

The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Sanders Morris, has uncommitted financing arrangements with clearing brokers that finance its customer accounts, certain broker-dealer balances, and firm trading positions. Although these customer accounts and broker-dealer balances are not reflected on the consolidated balance sheets for financial reporting purposes, Sanders Morris has generally agreed to indemnify these clearing brokers for losses they may sustain in connection with the accounts, and therefore, retains risk on these accounts. Sanders Morris is required to maintain certain cash or securities on deposit with its clearing brokers. Deposits with clearing organizations were ~~$300,000~~$250,000 as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

In connection with the Tectonic Merger and the Company’s initial public offering (see Note 2, Tectonic Merger and Initial Public Offering of Series B Preferred Stock, to these consolidated financial statements for more information), the Company entered into amended and restated employment agreements with Patrick Howard, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, and Ken Bramlage, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. In addition, the Company entered into an employment agreement with A. Haag Sherman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in connection with the Company’s merger with Tectonic Holdings and its initial public offering. Messrs. Sherman and Howard’s employment agreements have a four year term and Mr. Bramlage’s employment agreement has a three year term. Each employment agreement is automatically renewable for an additional one-year term unless either party elects not to renew.

Management agreements with Services: Through May 2019, the Company had management services agreements (the “Tectonic Management Services Agreement”) with Tectonic Services, LLC (“Tectonic Services”). Tectonic Services was the Managing Member of Tectonic Holdings, Tectonic Advisors, Sanders Morris and HWG prior to the Tectonic Merger. Under the Tectonic Management Services Agreement, Tectonic Services was paid on a monthly basis for management services to assist in conducting business operations and accomplishing strategic objectives. The Tectonic Management Services Agreement was terminated upon the closing of the Tectonic Merger. The Company did not incur any expense under the Tectonic Management Services Agreement for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020. The Company incurred ~~$37,000~~expense of $35,000 and ~~$122,000~~$118,000 under the Tectonic Management Services Agreement during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, and $95,000 and $179,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, which is included in other operating expenses on the consolidated statements of income. There was $100,000 payable to Services under these agreements as of December 31, 2018.2019. There was no payable to Tectonic Services under these agreements as of June 30, 2020 or December 31, 2019.

Advisors’ service agreements: In January 2006, the Company entered into a services agreement (the “Tectonic Advisors-CWA Services Agreement”) with Cain Watters. The owners of Cain Watters together hold approximately 31% of the voting ownership in the Company. Under the Tectonic Advisors-CWA Services Agreement, Cain Watters pays the Company for due diligence and research services on investment alternatives available to Cain Watters’ clients. The Company earned $489,000 and $912,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, and $387,000 and $706,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, ~~respectively, and $365,000 and $679,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018,~~ respectively, under the Tectonic Advisors-CWA Services Agreement. These fees are included in investment advisory and other related services in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. The Company had ~~$118,000~~$355,000 and ~~$198,000~~$193,000 in fees receivable related to these services at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively, which are included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.

CWA Fee Allocation Agreement: In January 2006, Tectonic Advisors entered into an agreement (the “Fee Allocation Agreement”) with Cain Watters with reference to its advisory agreement with the Bank. Tectonic Advisors had ~~$180,000~~$175,000 and $186,000 payable to Cain Watters related to this agreement at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively, which are included in other liabilities on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

DCFH Series A Preferred Stock: The Company had 80,338 shares of Series A preferred stock outstanding to DCFH as of ~~June 30, 2019 and~~ December 31, 2018, representing all of the Series A preferred stock outstanding of the Company. DCFH has as its general partner an entity owned by a director of the Company. The Series A preferred stock was issued in exchange for the Tectonic Holdings preferred units in the Tectonic Merger. The Tectonic Holdings preferred units were issued in an exchange that occurred prior to the Tectonic Merger, under which an unsecured note payable to DCFH was exchanged for the Tectonic Holdings preferred units. See Note 2, Tectonic Merger and Initial Public Offerings of Series B Preferred Stock, into these consolidated financial statements for more information. The Series A preferred stock held by DCFH ranks senior to our common stock and pari passu to the Series B preferred stock issued in our initial public offering as to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution and/or winding up. Dividends will be paid on the Series A preferred stock only when, as and if declared by our board of directors at a rate of 10% per annum (payable quarterly). The Series A preferred stock has a liquidation preference of $100 per share. In addition, the Series A preferred stock is not convertible into any other security of the Company. The Series A preferred stock is redeemable at the option of the Company at any time after the fifth anniversary of the original issue date at a redemption price equal to the liquidation preference, plus any declared but unpaid dividends, subject to the requisite approval of the Federal Reserve, if any.

On July 12, 2019, the Company repurchased and retired the Series A preferred stock from DCFH. ~~See Note 19, Subsequent Events, for more information.~~There was no Series A preferred stock outstanding as of December 31, 2019 or June 30, 2020.

Recruitment incentive ~~note receivable:~~compensation expense: ~~Notes receivable, related parties represents amounts~~Amounts were provided to or paid on behalf of financial advisors upon employment primarily as a recruitment incentive. ~~Amounts provided to financial advisors~~These amounts were recorded as notes receivable, related parties, ~~are~~and were forgiven on a fixed repayment schedule, ~~and~~with the forgiven amounts ~~result~~resulting in the recognition of compensation expense to the payee. The amortization period for the notes receivable, related parties ~~does~~did not exceed three years. Upon termination of employment of a payee financial advisor, any principal and interest outstanding iswould have been immediately due and payable.

~~Notes~~The notes receivable, related parties, were fully repaid as of December 31, 2019. Therefore, there was ~~$29,000 and $58,000~~no amount receivable under the notes receivable, related parties as of June 30, ~~2019 and~~2020 or December 31, ~~2018, respectively. The~~2019. There was no expense recognized for the three or six months ended June 30, 2020, and the Company recognized $15,000 and $30,000 in compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, ~~and $10,000 and $33,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, in compensation expense~~ in relation to the forgiven notes receivable, including related interest ~~income in relation to the forgiven notes receivable.~~income.

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, certain officers, directors and their affiliated companies had depository accounts with the Bank totaling approximately ~~$3.5~~$6.3 million. None of those deposit accounts have terms more favorable than those available to any other depositor.

~~The~~As of June 30, 2020, the Bank had noPPP loans to ~~officers,~~certain of its directors and their affiliated companies ~~during~~totaling $2.9 million in the ~~three~~aggregate. These loans were made to the Bank’s directors and ~~six months ended June 30, 2019 or 2018.~~

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s and, accordingly, the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under GAAP, regulatory reporting requirements, and regulatory capital standards. The Bank’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. Furthermore, the Bank’s regulators could require adjustments to regulatory capital not reflected in these financial statements.

Quantitative measures established by regulatory capital standards to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets, common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) capital to total risk-weighted assets, and of tier 1 capital to average assets. To be categorized as “well-capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework, the Bank must maintain (i) a Total risk-based capital ratio of 10%; (ii) a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8%; (iii) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5%; and (iv) a CET1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.5%.

In addition, the Basel III regulatory capital reforms (“Basel III”) implemented a capital conservation buffer of 2.5% to be phased in 0.625% each year over a four-year period, becoming fully implemented January 1, 2019. The Basel III minimum capital ratio requirements as applicable to the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2019 after the full phase-in period are summarized in the table below.

	BASEL III Minimum for Capital Adequacy Requirements			BASEL III Additional Capital Conservation Buffer			BASEL III Ratio with Capital Conservation Buffer			BASEL III Minimum for Capital Adequacy Requirements			BASEL III Additional Capital Conservation Buffer			BASEL III Ratio with Capital Conservation Buffer
Total Risk Based Capital (total capital to risk weighted assets)		8.0	%		2.5	%		10.5	%		8.0	%		2.5	%		10.5	%
Tier 1 Risk Based Capital (tier 1 to risk weighted assets)		6.0	%		2.5	%		8.5	%		6.0	%		2.5	%		8.5	%
Common Equity Tier 1 Risk Based ( CET1 to risk weighted assets)											4.5	%		2.5	%		7.0	%
Tier 1 Leverage Ratio (tier 1 to average assets)		4.0	%		-	%		4.0	%		4.0	%		-	%		4.0	%
Common Equity Tier 1 Risk Based (CET1 to risk weighted assets)		4.5	%		2.5	%		7.0	%

Accordingly, a financial institution may be considered “well capitalized” under the prompt corrective action framework, but not satisfy the fully phased-in Basel III capital ratios. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Bank’s regulatory capital ratios are in excess of the capital conservation buffer and the levels established for “well capitalized” institutions under the Basel III Rules.

	Actual					Minimum Capital Required - Basel III					Required to be Considered Well Capitalized					Actual					Minimum Capital Required - Basel III					Required to be Considered Well Capitalized
(In thousands)	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of June 30, 2019
(In thousands, except percentages)																Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
As of June 30, 2020
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Tectonic Financial, Inc. (consolidated)	$	44,919		18.38	%	$	25,661		10.50	%	$	24,440		10.00	%	$	44,748		17.04	%	$	27,568		10.50	%	$	26,255		10.00	%
T Bank, N.A.		37,205		15.42			25,340		10.50			24,133		10.00			44,632		17.15			27,329		10.50			26,028		10.00
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Tectonic Financial, Inc. (consolidated)		43,812		17.93			20,774		8.50			19,552		8.00			42,200		16.07			22,317		8.50			21,004		8.00
T Bank, N.A.		36,098		14.96			20,513		8.50			19,307		8.00			42,084		16.17			22,124		8.50			20,822		8.00
Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Tectonic Financial, Inc. (consolidated)		20,272		8.29			17,108		7.00			15,886		6.50			24,950		9.50			18,379		7.00			17,066		6.50
T Bank, N.A.		36,098		14.96			16,893		7.00			15,687		6.50			42,084		16.17			18,219		7.00			16,918		6.50
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
Tectonic Financial, Inc. (consolidated)		43,812		14.58			12,019		4.00			15,024		5.00			42,200		9.01			18,737		4.00			23,422		5.00
T Bank, N.A.		36,098		11.80			12,233		4.00			15,292		5.00			42,084		9.09			18,512		4.00			23,140		5.00

As of December 31, 2018
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Tectonic Financial, Inc. (consolidated)	$	28,067		12.41	%	$	23,745		9.875	%	$	22,615		10.00	%
T Bank, N.A.		30,116		13.45			22,116		9.875			22,396		10.00
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Tectonic Financial, Inc. (consolidated)		27,193		12.02			19,222		7.875			18,092		8.00
T Bank, N.A.		29,242		13.06			17,637		7.875			17,917		8.00
Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Tectonic Financial, Inc. (consolidated)		19,159		8.47			19,222		6.375			14,699		6.50
T Bank, N.A.		29,242		13.06			14,278		6.375			14,557		6.50
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
Tectonic Financial, Inc. (consolidated)		27,193		9.40			11,570		4.00			14,462		5.00
T Bank, N.A.		29,242		10.32			11,334		4.00			14,167		5.00

Dividend Restrictions. Banking regulations may limit the amount of dividends that may be paid. Approval by regulatory authorities is required if the effect of dividends declared (including those on the Series A preferred stock) would cause the regulatory capital of the Bank and/or the Company to fall below specified minimum levels. Approval is also required if dividends declared exceed the net profits for that year combined with the retained net profits for the preceding two years. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, approximately ~~$9.2~~$12.7 million was available for the declaration of dividends by the Bank to the Company without prior approval of regulatory agencies and still maintain its “well capitalized” status. In addition, as a Texas corporation, we are restricted under the Texas Business Organizations Code from paying dividends under certain conditions. Under Texas law, we cannot pay dividends to shareholders if the dividends exceed our surplus or if after giving effect to the dividends, we would be insolvent.

In addition to the regulatory requirements of the federal banking agencies, Sanders Morris and Tectonic Advisors are subject to the regulatory framework applicable to registered investment advisors under the SEC’s Division of Investment Management, and additionally, Sanders Morris is regulated by FINRA, which, among other requirements, imposes minimums on its net regulatory capital.

The Company’s reportable segments consist of Banking, Other Financial Services, and HoldCo operations.

The Banking segment consists of operations relative to the Company’s full service banking operations, including providing depository and lending services to individual and business customers, and other related banking services.

The Other Financial Services segment includes managed and directed brokerage, investment advisory services, including related trust company operations, third party administration, and insurance brokerage services to both individuals and businesses.

The HoldCo operations include the operations and subordinated debt held at the Bank’s immediate parent, as well as the activities of the financial holding company which serves as TBI’s parent.

The tables below present the financial information for each segment that is specifically identifiable, or based on allocations using internal methods, for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018:~~2019:

(In thousands)	Banking		Other Financial Services		HoldCo			Consolidated		Banking		Other Financial Services		HoldCo			Consolidated
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
Three Months Ended June 30, 2020
Income Statement
Total interest income	$	8,568	$	-	$	6		$	8,574	$	4,722	$	-	$	-		$	4,722
Total interest expense		2,432		-		486			2,918		1,241		-		218			1,459
Provision for loan losses		483		-		-			483		475		-		-			475
Net-interest income after provision for loan losses		5,653		-		(480	)		5,173
Net-interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses											3,006		-		(218	)		2,788
Non-interest income		72		14,851		29			14,952		191		6,363		22			6,576
Depreciation and amortization expense		187		232		-			419		92		51		-			143
All other non-interest expense		3,728		10,481		340			14,549		1,369		4,917		234			6,520
Income (loss) before income tax	$	1,810	$	4,138	$	(791	)	$	5,157	$	1,736	$	1,395	$	(430	)	$	2,701

Goodwill and other intangibles	$	9,659	$	2,350	$	-		$	12,009	$	9,458	$	2,350	$	-		$	11,808
Total assets	$	324,969	$	10,466	$	608		$	336,043	$	520,439	$	9,117	$	319		$	529,875

(In thousands)	Banking		Other Financial Services		HoldCo			Consolidated		Banking		Other Financial Services		HoldCo			Consolidated
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
Income Statement
Total interest income	$	3,546	$	-	$	-		$	3,546	$	9,838	$	-	$	-		$	9,838
Total interest expense		778		-		247			1,025		2,521		-		437			2,958
Provision for loan losses		77		-		-			77		1,263		-		-			1,263
Net-interest income after provision for loan losses		2,691		-		(247	)		2,444
Net-interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses											6,054		-		(437	)		5,617
Non-interest income		161		5,229		-			5,390		653		14,002		22			14,677
Depreciation and amortization expense		100		98		-			198		186		158		-			344
All other non-interest expense		1,844		3,556		105			5,505		3,400		10,268		474			14,142
Income (loss) before income tax	$	908	$	1,575	$	(352	)	$	2,131	$	3,121	$	3,576	$	(889	)	$	5,808

Goodwill and other intangibles	$	9,860	$	-	$	-		$	9,860	$	9,458	$	2,350	$	-		$	11,808
Total assets	$	280,859	$	6,336	$	784		$	287,979	$	520,439	$	9,117	$	319		$	529,875

(In thousands)	Banking		Other Financial Services		HoldCo			Consolidated		Banking		Other Financial Services		HoldCo			Consolidated
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
Income Statement
Total interest income	$	7,022	$	-	$	-		$	7,022	$	4,466	$	-	$	-		$	4,466
Total interest expense		1,445		-		455			1,900		1,244		-		238			1,482
Provision for loan losses		321		-		-			321		400		-		-			400
Net-interest income after provision for loan losses		5,256		-		(455	)		4,801
Net-interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses											2,822		-		(238	)		2,584
Non-interest income		157		10,978		1,694			12,829		74		7,696		17			7,787
Depreciation and amortization expense		201		196		-			397		94		128		-			222
All other non-interest expense		3,707		7,557		154			11,418		1,820		5,523		207			7,550
Income (loss) before income tax	$	1,505	$	3,225	$	1,085		$	5,815	$	982	$	2,045	$	(428	)	$	2,599

Goodwill and other intangibles	$	9,860	$	-	$	-		$	9,860	$	9,659	$	2,350	$	-		$	12,009
Total assets	$	280,859	$	6,336	$	784		$	287,979	$	324,969	$	10,466	$	608		$	336,043

The fair value of an asset or liability is the price that would be received to sell that asset or paid to transfer that liability in an orderly transaction occurring in the principal market (or most advantageous market in the absence of a principal market) for such asset or liability. In estimating fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. Such valuation techniques are consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques include the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. FASB ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, establishes a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Where quoted market prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. If quoted market prices are not available, then fair values are estimated by using quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or independent asset pricing services and pricing models, the inputs of which are market-based or independently sourced market parameters, including, but not limited to, yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, prepayments, defaults, cumulative loss projections and cash flows. Such securities are classified in Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. The Company has no securities in the Level 1 or Level 3 inputs.

The following table summarizes securities available for sale measured at fair value on a recurring basis, segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:

(In thousands)	Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total Fair Value		Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total Fair Value
As of June 30, 2019
As of June 30, 2020
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government agencies	$	-	$	8,998	$	-	$	8,998	$	-	$	10,157	$	-	$	10,157
Mortgage-backed securities		-		2,053		-		2,053		-		2,873		-		2,873

As of December 31, 2018
As of December 31, 2019
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government agencies	$	-	$	9,008	$	-	$	9,008	$	-	$	10,731	$	-	$	10,731
Mortgage-backed securities		-		2,496		-		2,496		-		1,946		-		1,946

Market valuations of our investment securities which are classified as level 2 are provided by an independent third party. The fair values are determined by using several sources for valuing fixed income securities. Their techniques include pricing models that vary based on the type of asset being valued and incorporate available trade, bid and other market information. In accordance with the fair value hierarchy, the market valuation sources include observable market inputs and are therefore considered Level 2 inputs for purposes of determining the fair values.

The Company considers transfers between the levels of the hierarchy to be recognized at the end of related reporting periods. During the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, no assets for which fair value is measured on a recurring basis transferred between any levels of the hierarchy.

Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment).

Financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the reported periods include impaired loans and loans held for sale.

Impaired loans. As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, there were no impaired loans that were reduced by specific valuation allowances.

The significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) used in the fair value measurement of collateral for collateral-dependent impaired loans primarily relate to the specialized discounting criteria applied to the borrower’s reported amount of collateral. The amount of the collateral discount depends upon the condition and marketability of the collateral, as well as other factors which may affect the collectability of the loan. As the Company’s primary objective in the event of default would be to liquidate the collateral to settle the outstanding balance of the loan, collateral that is less marketable would receive a larger discount. During the reported periods, there were no discounts for collateral-dependent impaired loans.

The significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) used in the fair value measurement of cash flow impaired loans relate to discounted cash flows models using current market rates applied to the estimated life of the loan and credit risk adjustments. Future cash flows are discounted using current interest rates for similar credit risks. During the reported periods, there were no discounts for cash flow loans.

~~The~~ valuation of our not readily marketable investment securities which are classified as Level 3 are based on the Company’s own assumptions and inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement, and are unobservable.

Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the Level 3 fair value measurements in their entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the assets. It is reasonably possible that a change in the estimated fair value for instruments measured using Level 3 inputs could occur in the future.

Loans held for sale. Loans held for sale include the guaranteed portion of SBA and USDA loans and are reported at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. Fair value for SBA and USDA loans is based on market indications available in the market. There were no impairments reported for the periods presented.

Non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the reported periods include other real estate owned which, upon initial recognition, was re-measured and reported at fair value through a charge-off to the allowance for loan losses. Additionally, foreclosed assets which, subsequent to their initial recognition, are re-measured at fair value through a write-down included in other non-interest expense. Regulatory guidelines require the Company to reevaluate the fair value of foreclosed assets on at least an annual basis. The fair value of foreclosed assets, upon initial recognition and impairment, are re-measured using Level 2 inputs based on observable market data. Estimated fair value of other real estate is based on appraisals. Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management. As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, there were no foreclosed assets. During the three months ended March 31, 2019, there was one real estate property foreclosed on with a fair value of $275,000 which had been collateral on a SBA guaranteed loan. The property was sold during the three months ended June 30, 2019. There were no foreclosed assets re-measured during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.

The methods and assumptions used to estimate fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis are described as follows:

Carrying amount is the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, restricted securities, accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable. The estimated fair value of demand and savings deposits is the carrying amount since rates are regularly adjusted to market rates and amounts are payable on demand. For borrowed funds and variable rate loans or deposits that re-price frequently and fully, the estimated fair value is the carrying amount. For fixed rate loans or deposits and for variable rate loans or deposits with infrequent re-pricing, fair value is based on discounted cash flows using current market rates applied to the estimated life and credit risk. For loans held for sale, the estimated fair value is based on market indications for similar assets in the active market. The estimated fair value of other financial instruments and off-balance-sheet loan commitments approximate cost and are not considered significant to this presentation.

The Company adds a servicing asset when loans are sold and the servicing is retained, and uses the amortization method for the treatment of the servicing asset. The servicing asset is carried at lower of cost or fair value. Loan servicing assets do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Accordingly, fair value is estimated using a discounted cash flow model having significant inputs of discount rate, prepayment speed and default rate. Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy. During the six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company added servicing assets totaling $92,000 in connection with the sale of $6.2 million in loans during the three months ended March 31, 2020. There were no sales of loans for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019 or 2018. There was no allowance provision required for the three months ended June 30, 2019, and the allowance provision required for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $162,000.~~2019. For the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2020, there was a credit provision of $100,000 to the valuation allowance for servicing assets. There was no allowance provision ~~required~~for the three months ended June 30, 2019. The allowance provision for servicing assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 was ~~$46,000 and $170,000, respectively.~~$162,000.

FASB ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis. The estimated fair value approximates carrying value for cash and cash equivalents and accrued interest. The methodologies for other financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis are discussed ~~below:~~below.

Securities held to maturity. The securities in this category are Property Assessed Clean Energy investments. These investment contracts or bonds originate under a contractual obligation between the property owners, the local county administration, and a third-party administrator and sponsor. These investments have no readily determinable fair value.

Loans. The estimated fair value approximates carrying value for variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk. The fair value of fixed-rate loans and variable-rate loans which reprice on an infrequent basis is estimated by discounting future cash flows using the current interest rates at which similar loans with similar terms would be made to borrowers of similar credit quality.

Deposits. The fair values of demand deposits, savings deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand and, therefore, approximate their carrying amounts. The fair values for time deposits are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that utilizes interest rates currently being offered on time deposits with similar contractual maturities.

Borrowed Funds. The estimated fair value approximates carrying value for short-term borrowings. The fair value of long-term fixed-rate borrowings is estimated using quoted market prices, if available, or by discounting future cash flows using current interest rates for similar financial instruments. The estimated fair value approximates carrying value for variable-rate junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures that reprice quarterly.

Loan Commitments, Standby and Commercial Letters of Credit. Our lending commitments have variable interest rates and “escape” clauses if the customer’s credit quality deteriorates. Therefore, the fair values of these items are not significant and are not included in the following table.

Carrying amounts and estimated fair values of other financial instruments by level of valuation input were as follows:

	June 30, 2019				June 30, 2020
(In thousands)	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets:
Level 1 inputs:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	19,546	$	19,546	$	80,195	$	80,195
Level 2 inputs:
Securities available for sale		11,051		11,051		13,030		13,030
Securities, restricted		1,940		1,940		2,429		2,429
Loans held for sale		17,904		19,607		11,625		12,715
Accrued interest receivable		1,222		1,222		2,340		2,340
Level 3 inputs:
Securities held to maturity		7,474		7,474		5,827		5,827
Securities not readily marketable		100		100		100		100
Loans, net		253,030		251,520		392,221		390,816
Servicing asset		982		982		759		759
Financial liabilities:
Level 1 inputs:
Non-interest bearing deposits		37,521		37,521		73,964		73,964
Level 2 inputs:
Interest bearing deposits		213,726		213,901		348,810		349,031
Borrowed funds		22,000		22,000		45,886		45,886
Accrued interest payable		563		563		588		588
Off-balance sheet assets:
Commitments to extend credit						-		-
Standby letters of credit						-		-

	December 31, 2018				December 31, 2019
(In thousands)	Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Estimated Fair Value
Financial assets:
Level 1 inputs:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	18,458	$	18,458	$	20,203	$	20,203
Level 2 inputs:
Securities available for sale		11,504		11,504		12,677		12,677
Securities, restricted		1,926		1,926		2,417		2,417
Loans held for sale		16,345		17,732		9,894		10,838
Accrued interest receivable		1,141		1,141		1,322		1,322
Level 3 inputs:
Securities held to maturity		7,722		7,722		6,349		6,349
Securities not readily marketable		100		100		100		100
Loans, net		234,033		232,508		289,671		287,823
Servicing asset		1,467		1,467		918		918
Financial liabilities:
Level 1 inputs:
Non-interest bearing deposits		41,142		41,142		33,890		33,890
Level 2 inputs:
Interest bearing deposits		209,231		206,023		249,711		249,524
Borrowed funds		18,915		18,915		24,000		24,000
Accrued interest payable		571		571		595		595
Off-balance sheet assets:
Commitments to extend credit						-		-
Standby letters of credit						-		-

ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” ASU 2016-02 among other things, requires lessees to recognize a lease liability, which is a lessee‘s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. ASU 2016-02 does not significantly change lease accounting requirements applicable to lessors; however, certain changes were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model. ASU 2016-2 was effective on January 1, 2019 and required transition using a modified retrospective approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements.2019. The Company adopted ASU 2016-02 as of January 1, 2019, and ~~did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.~~amounts recorded as right-of-use lease assets and lease liabilities were $1.6 million and $1.7 million, respectively, as of January 1, 2019.

ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” ASU 2016-13 requires the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts and requires enhanced disclosures related to the significant estimates and judgments used in estimating credit losses, as well as the credit quality and underwriting standards of an organization’s portfolio. In addition, ASU 2016-13 amends the accounting for credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. ASU 2016-13 ~~will be~~became effective for most public companies on January 1, ~~2020.~~2020, subject to a company’s election to defer implementation due to the COVID-19 pandemic. On July 17, 2019, the FASB proposed to delay the implementation of the current expected credit loss standard (“CECL”) for certain companies including smaller reporting companies (“SRCs”) as defined by the SEC. The Company is ~~currently working through implementation~~designated as a SRC with the SEC. The proposed delay by FASB was subject to a comment period. At the October 16, 2019 FASB meeting, the FASB voted unanimously to delay the effective date of CECL adoption for SRCs to January 1, 2023. The Company has developed processes for assessment and documentation, model development and validation. While the Company generally expects that the implementation of ASU 2016-13 may increase their allowance for loan losses balance, the adoption will be significantly influenced by the composition, characteristics and quality of the loan portfolio along with the prevailing economic conditions and forecasts as of the adoption date.

ASU 2017-04, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” ASU 2017-04 eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test which required entities to compute the implied fair value of goodwill. Under ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 ~~will be~~became effective for the Company on January 1, 2020, ~~with earlier adoption permitted~~ and isdid not ~~expected to~~ have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) - Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.” ASU 2018-13 modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820. The amendments in this update remove disclosures that no longer are considered cost beneficial, modify/clarify the specific requirements of certain disclosures, and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant. ASU 2018-13 ~~will be~~became effective for the Company on January 1, 2020, and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.” The guidance issued in this update simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the guidance in ASC 740 related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition for deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. ASU 2019-12 also simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill. ASU 2019-12 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2021, with early adoption permitted, and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2019, the Company acquired the assets of Nolan, a TPA based in Kansas City, Kansas, with a cash payment of $2.5 million and offers the TPA services as a division of the Bank. Founded in 1979, Nolan provides clients with retirement plan design and administrative services, specializing in ministerial recordkeeping, administration, actuarial and design services for retirement plans for small businesses and professional practices. Nolan has clients in 50 states and Nolan shares many clients with our trust department. We believe that the addition of TPA services ~~will allow~~allows us to serve our clients more fully and to attract new clients to our trust platform.

The assets acquired consisted of furniture, fixtures and equipment with a fair value of $150,000. There were no liabilities acquired, resulting in goodwill of $2.4 million from the acquisition. The goodwill will not be amortized, but will be tested for impairment annually. The goodwill recorded is ~~not~~ deductible for federal income tax purposes. In addition, the Bank entered into a consulting agreement with an entity controlled by Mr. Nolan and his family, pursuant to which Mr. Nolan agreed to serve as CEO of the division for three years after closing and provide mutually agreeable consulting services thereafter, in consideration for a monthly fee of $26,041 plus incentive payments based on certain performance metrics, for eight years after closing.

The following table presents financial information regarding the former Nolan operations included in the Company’s consolidated statements of income for the six months ended June 30, 2019. In addition, the table presents unaudited condensed pro forma financial information assuming that the Nolan acquisition was completed as of January 1, 2018.

The table has been prepared for comparative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the actual results that would have been obtained had the acquisition actually occurred on January 1, 2018, or is it indicative of future results.

On July 12, 2019, the Company repurchased 80,338 shares of its Series A preferred stock, representing all of the outstanding shares of the Series A preferred stock, from DCFH for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $8.0 million. The repurchase was funded using a portion of the net proceeds from the Company’s initial public offering of its Series B preferred stock, which was completed on May 14, 2019.

Item2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q, as well as with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing in our ~~Prospectus, filed with~~Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ~~SEC on May 13,~~year ended December 31, 2019 ~~pursuant to Rule 424(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended~~ (the ~~“Securities Act”~~“2019 Form 10-K”)~~, relating to the initial public offering of our Series B preferred stock (the “IPO Prospectus”)~~.

Statements contained in this report that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including our expectations, intentions, beliefs, or strategies regarding the future. These statements are often, but not always, made through the use of words or phrases such as “may,” “should,” “could,” “predict,” “potential,” “believe,” “will likely result,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “seek,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “projection,” “would” and “outlook,” and similar expressions. It is important to note that our actual results may differ materially from those in or implied by such forward-looking statements due to the factors discussed under the section entitled “Risk Factors,” in our ~~IPO Prospectus,~~2019 Form 10-K, and under the section entitled “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-Q, including, but not limited to, the following:

You should not place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement reflects only information known to us as of the date on which it is made and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict which will arise. In addition, we cannot assess the impact of each factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

The Company continues to actively monitor developments related to the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on the Company’s business, customers, employees, vendors, and service providers. Through the second quarter of 2020, the most notable financial impact to the Company’s results of operations is the building of the allowance for loan losses, primarily as a result of continued deterioration in macroeconomic variables such as unemployment, which are incorporated into our economic forecasts utilized to calculate our allowance for loan losses. See the section captioned “Allowance for Loan Losses” included elsewhere in this discussion for further analysis of the provision for loan losses.

In addition to the effect on our allowance for loan losses, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a significant and continuing decrease in commercial activity throughout the State of Texas as well as nationally, which has or may have the following impacts on the Company:

The Company continues to monitor and review the evolving risks and developments of the COVID-19 pandemic. The duration and scope of the disruptions due to the pandemic and their impact on the Company, its internal operations, including personnel on which we rely, our customers and the areas in which they operate, and the wider economy remain uncertain.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company for the periods covered by this Form 10-Q are detailed in each applicable section of “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included below.

We are a financial holding company headquartered in Dallas, Texas. We provide a wide array of financial products and services including banking, trust, investment advisory, securities brokerage, third party administration, recordkeeping and insurance to individuals, small businesses and institutions in all 50 states.

The following discussion and analysis presents our consolidated financial condition as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, and our consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. The discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the notes related thereto in this Form 10-Q and in the audited financial statements ~~included within~~in our ~~IPO Registration Statement, initially~~Form 10-K filed with the SEC on ~~April 18, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

On May 13, 2019, we completed a merger with Tectonic Holdings, through which we expanded our financial services to include investment advisory, securities brokerage and insurance services. Pursuant to the Tectonic Merger Agreement, dated March 28, 2019, by and between the Company and Tectonic Holdings, Tectonic Holdings merged with and into the Company, with the Company as the surviving institution. Immediately after the completion of the Tectonic Merger, the Company completed a 1-for-2 reverse stock split with respect to the outstanding shares of its common stock. The computations of all share and per share amounts in this Form 10-Q have been adjusted retroactively to reflect the reverse stock split.

Following the Tectonic Merger, we operate through four main direct and indirect subsidiaries: (i) TBI, which was incorporated under the laws of the State of Texas on December 23, 2002 to serve as the bank holding company for the Bank, (ii) Sanders Morris, a registered broker-dealer with FINRA, and registered investment advisor with the SEC, (iii) Tectonic Advisors, a registered investment advisor registered with the SEC focused generally on managing money for relatively large, affiliated institutions, and (iv) HWG, an insurance agency registered with the TDI.

In January 2019, the Bank acquired Nolan, a TPA based in Overland Park, Kansas. Founded in 1979, Nolan provides clients with retirement plan design and administrative services, specializing in ministerial recordkeeping, administration, actuarial and design services for retirement plans of small businesses and professional practices. Nolan has clients in 50 states and is the administrator for over 800 retirement plans, 551 of which are also clients of the Bank, which is over 54% of the retirement plans we service in our trust department. We believe that theThe addition of TPA services allows us to serve our clients more fully and to attract new clients to our trust platform. Please see Note 18, Nolan Acquisition, to the consolidated financial statements included in ~~the~~this Form 10-Q for more information.

The Company completed the underwritten initial public offering of its Series B preferred stock on May 14, 2019. In connection with the initial public offering, the Company issued and sold 1,725,000 shares of its Series B preferred stock, including 225,000 shares sold pursuant to the underwriters’ full exercise of their option to purchase additional shares, at an offering price of $10.00 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $17.25 million before deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses, and aggregate net proceeds of $15.5 million after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses.

Prior to the Tectonic Merger, Sanders Morris and Tectonic Advisors were wholly owned subsidiaries of Tectonic Holdings, which was under common control with the Company. The Tectonic Merger has been accounted for as a combination of businesses under common control in accordance with Topic 805. Under Topic 805, all the assets and liabilities of Tectonic Holdings are carried over to the books of the Company at their then current carrying amounts, and the consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the acquisition of Sanders Morris, HWG and Tectonic Advisors for all periods subsequent to the earliest date at which the entities were under common control, May 15, 2017. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.

We prepare consolidated financial statements based on GAAP and to customary practices within the financial services industry. These policies, in certain areas, require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. While we base estimates on historical experience, current information and other factors deemed to be relevant, actual results could differ from those estimates.

We consider accounting estimates to be critical to reported financial results if (i) the accounting estimate requires management to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time we make the accounting estimate and (ii) different estimates that management reasonably could have used for the accounting estimate in the current period, or changes in the accounting estimate that are reasonably likely to occur from period to period, could have a material impact on the financial statements. Accounting policies related to the allowance for loan losses are considered to be critical as these policies involve considerable subjective judgment and estimation by management.

Net income available to common shareholders ~~totaled $2.0~~decreased $262,000, or 13.2% to $1.7 million ~~or $0.30 per diluted common share~~ for the three months ended June 30, ~~2019, and $1.7~~2020, compared to $2.0 million ~~or $0.26 per diluted common share,~~ for the three months ended June 30, ~~2018, an increase of $277,000, or 16.2%.~~2019. Earnings per diluted common share was $0.26 and $0.30, for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Net income available to common shareholders ~~totaled $4.0~~decreased $242,000, or 6.1% to $3.7 million ~~or $0.61 per diluted common share~~ for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, compared to ~~$5.0~~$4.0 million ~~or $0.77 per diluted common share~~ for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018, a decrease of $1.0 million or 21.0%. The decrease in net income available to~~2019. Earnings per diluted common ~~shareholders~~share was $0.57 and $0.61, for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, ~~was primarily the result of a $3.2 million increase in non-interest expense, a $162,000 increase~~respectively.

Our accounting and reporting policies conform to generally accepted accounting principles in the ~~provision for loan losses~~United States (“GAAP”) and ~~a $395,000 increase~~the prevailing practices in ~~income tax expense, partially offset~~the banking industry. However, this Form 10-Q contains financial information determined by ~~a $534,000 increase~~methods other than in ~~net interest income and a $2.1 million increase in non-interest income.~~

accordance with GAAP which includes return on average tangible common equity. We calculate return on average tangible common equity as net income available to common shareholders (net income less dividends paid on preferred stock) divided by average tangible common equity. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure for tangible common equity is average total shareholders’ equity. We believe these non-GAAP measures and ratios, when taken together with the corresponding GAAP measures and ratios, provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance. We believe investors benefit from referring to these non-GAAP measures and ratios in assessing our operating results and related trends, and when planning and forecasting future periods. However, these non-GAAP measures and ratios should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for or preferable to, measures and ratios prepared in accordance with GAAP.

For the three months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, return on average assets was ~~2.70%~~1.68%, compared to ~~2.69%~~2.71% for the same period in the prior year, and return on average tangible common equity was ~~39.21%~~29.23%, compared to ~~41.71%~~39.32% for the same period in the prior year. For the six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, return on average assets was ~~2.75%~~2.07%, compared to ~~3.83%~~2.77% for the ~~same period in the prior year,~~six months ended June 30, 2019, and return on average tangible common equity was ~~43.42%~~33.42%, compared to ~~68.86%~~43.78% for the same period in the prior year. The ~~higher returns~~lower return ratios for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 were primarily due to increases in both average assets and average tangible common equity during the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2019. The growth in average tangible common equity between the two periods is primarily related to earnings, net of preferred dividends paid, from June 30, 2019 to June 30, 2020. The growth in average assets is primarily attributable to growth in average interest-bearing deposits during the six months ended June 30, ~~2018 was primarily due~~2020 to ~~a $1.7 million gain on bargain purchase related to~~increase liquidity in anticipation of funding the ~~acquisition of Sanders Morris during the three months ended March 31, 2018.~~PPP loans discussed under “COVID-19 Update” above.

The following table ~~reconciles net income to income available to common shareholders and~~ presents ~~the calculation~~non-GAAP reconciliations of return on average tangible common equity:

Total assets grew by ~~$24.3~~$164.8 million, or ~~7.8%~~45.1%, to ~~$336.0~~$529.9 million as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 from ~~$311.7~~$365.1 million as of December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. This increase was primarily due to an increase in ~~SBA loans. Our~~our loans, ~~held for investment,~~ net of allowance for loan losses, ~~increased $19.0~~of $102.6 million, or ~~8.1%~~35.4%, to ~~$253.0~~$392.2 million as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, from ~~$234.0~~$289.7 million as of December 31, ~~2018.~~2019, due primarily to loans originated under the SBA’s PPP program, and an increase in interest-bearing deposits at the Bank from purchases of certificates of deposit in the wholesale market. Substantially all loans outside of those made under the SBA’s PPP program are secured by specific collateral, including business assets, consumer assets, and commercial real estate.We anticipate that as the majority of PPP loans are forgiven or paid off, which we believe will occur principally over the next 12 months, and as customers spend down their PPP funds, this will result in a reduction in both loans and deposits.

Shareholders’ equity increased ~~$18.5~~$3.9 million, or ~~49.4%~~7.6%, to ~~$56.0~~$54.3 million as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, from ~~$37.5~~$50.5 million as of December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. See analysis of shareholders’ equity in the section captioned “Capital Resources and Regulatory Capital Requirements” included elsewhere in this discussion.

Results of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30 ~~2019~~, 2020 and ~~2018~~2019

Details of the changes in the various components of net income are discussed below.

Net interest income is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, such as loans, investment securities, and interest-bearing cash, and interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Changes in net interest income result from changes in volume and spread, and are reflected in the net interest margin, as well as changes in average interest rates. Volume refers to the average dollar level of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Spread refers to the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Margin refers to net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets, and is influenced by the level and relative mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

The following tables presents the changes in net interest income and identifies the changes due to differences in the average volume of interest-earning assets and interest–bearing liabilities and the changes due to changes in the average interest rate on those assets and liabilities. The changes in net interest income due to changes in both average volume and average interest rate have been allocated to the average volume change or the average interest rate change in proportion to the absolute amounts of the change in each.

~~Net interest income for the three months ended~~Three Months Ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and 2018 was $3.0 million and $2.5 million, respectively, an increase of $463,000, or 18.4%, due primarily to an increase in the average volume of loans. Net interest margin for the three months ended June 30, 2019 ~~and 2018 was 4.05% and 3.91%, an increase of 14 basis points, due primarily to the increase in average yields on loans and interest-bearing deposits, along with an increase in loan discount accretion.~~

The average volume of loans increased $32.7 million, or 14.4%, from $226.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, to $259.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019, and the average yield for loans increased 66 basis points from 5.80% for the three months ended June 30, 2018 to 6.45% for the three months ended June 30, 2019. The average yield on loans was positively impacted by the increases in market interest rates and increase in discount accretion. When we acquired the Bank, we applied purchase accounting to value the Bank’s assets at “fair value,” which resulted in a discount or premium being applied to certain loans. As a result, net interest margin may fluctuate from quarter to quarter, driven in part by the prepayment of loans with associated discounts (resulting in a gain and higher net interest margin) and premiums (resulting in a loss and lower net interest margin). In the second quarter of 2019, loan payoffs with associated net discounts resulted in additional income of $261,000, compared to $39,000 for loan payoffs with net discounts in the second quarter of 2018.

Average interest-bearing deposits increased $27.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared to the same period in the prior year, which included an increase in time deposits and money market deposit accounts of $14.5 million and $14.3 million, respectively, offset by $1.3 million decrease in savings and interest-bearing demand deposits. The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits increased 71 basis points from 1.51% for the three months ended June 30, 2018 to 2.22% for the three months ended June 30, 2019.

	Six Months Ended									Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2019 vs June 30, 2018									June 30, 2020 vs June 30, 2019
	Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in									Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in
(In thousands)	Rate			Average Volume			Total			Rate			Average Volume		Total
Interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold	$	36		$	37		$	73		$	(83	)	$	15	$	(68	)
Securities		(59	)		3			(56	)		(17	)		22		5
Loans, net of unearned discount ⁽¹⁾		535			1,000			1,535			(1,080	)		1,399		319
Total earning assets		512			1,040			1,552			(1,180	)		1,436		256

Savings and interest-bearing demand		(1	)		(3	)		(4	)		(1	)		2		1
Money market deposit accounts		128			67			195			(174	)		36		(138	)
Time deposits		599			238			837			(290	)		442		152
FHLB and other borrowings		73			(140	)		(67	)		(56	)		19		(37	)
Subordinated notes		-			57			57			(1	)		-		(1	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities		799			219			1,018			(522	)		499		(23	)

Changes in net interest income	$	(287	)	$	821		$	534		$	(658	)	$	937	$	279

Net interest income increased $279,000, or 9.3%, from $3.0 million for the ~~six~~three months ended June 30, 2019, to $3.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020. Net interest margin for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and ~~2018~~2019 was ~~$5.7 million~~2.74% and ~~$5.1 million, respectively, an~~4.05%, a decrease of 131 basis points. The increase ~~of $534,000, or 10.4%,~~in net interest income was primarily due ~~primarily~~ to an increase in the average volume of loans and decrease in average rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and borrowings, partly offset by a decrease in average yields on ~~loans, partially offset by an~~earning assets and increase in ~~the~~ average volume of interest-bearing deposits and borrowings.

The average volume of loans increased $117.3 million, or 45.2%, from $259.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019 to $376.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020, and the average yield for loans decreased 165 basis points from 6.45% for the three months ended June 30, 2019 to 4.80% for the three months ended June 30, 2020. PPP loans account for $64.9 million of the average volume increase. The changes compared to last year have been impacted by the recent short-term interest rate cuts and the interest rate that the PPP loans carry of 1.00%, as well as the timing of recognition of the related SBA loan fees, and increased liquidity on the balance sheet. See Paycheck Protection Loans under Loan Portfolio Composition within the discussion of our financial position below for more information. The Company expects to see continued volatility in the economic markets and government responses to these changes as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These changing conditions and governmental responses could have impacts on the balance sheet and income statement of the Company for the remainder of the year.

Average volume of interest-bearing deposits increased $136.8 million, or 63.2%, from $216.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2019, to $353.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020, and the average interest rate paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased 84 basis points from 2.22% for the three months ended June 30, 2019 to 1.38% for the three months ended June 30, 2020. The average cost of deposits during the three months ended June 30, 2020 was impacted by decreases in interest rates paid on ~~interest-bearing deposits.~~money market and time deposits as a result of the decrease in market interest rates.

Net interest income increased $1.2 million, or 21.1%, from $5.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, to $6.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020. Net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019 was 3.37% and ~~2018 was~~ 3.93% ~~and 4.05%~~, respectively, a decrease of 1256 basis ~~points,~~points. The increase in net interest income was primarily due ~~primarily~~ to an increase in the ~~increase~~average volume of loans and decrease in average rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and ~~borrowed funds, partially~~borrowings, partly offset by ~~an increase~~a decrease in average yields on ~~loans~~earning assets and increase in average volume of interest-bearing deposits ~~along with an increase~~and borrowings. The Company expects to see continued volatility in ~~loan discount accretion.~~the economic markets and government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The average volume of loans increased ~~$31.9~~$81.7 million, or ~~14.3%~~32.0%, from ~~$223.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, to~~ $255.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, ~~and the average yield for loans increased 48 basis points from 5.84%~~to $337.1 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018 to~~2020, and the average yield for loans decreased 81 basis points from 6.32% for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019. The average yield on loans was positively impacted by the increases in market interest rates and increase in discount accretion. For~~2019 to 5.51% for the six months ended ~~of 2019, loan payoffs with associated net discounts resulted in additional income of $292,000,~~June 30, 2020. The changes compared to ~~$239,000 for loan payoffs with net discounts~~last year have been impacted by the recent short-term interest rate cuts and increased liquidity on the balance sheet. The Company expects to see continued volatility in the ~~second quarter~~economic markets and government responses to these changes as a result of ~~2018.~~the COVID-19 pandemic. These changing conditions and governmental responses could have impacts on the balance sheet and income statement of the Company for the remainder of the year.

Average volume of interest-bearing deposits increased ~~$26.4~~$92.7 million, or 43.3%, from $214.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019, ~~compared~~ to ~~the same period in the prior year, which included an increase in time deposits and money market deposit accounts of $18.6~~$307.1 million ~~and $9.1 million, respectively, offset by $1.3 million decrease in savings and interest-bearing demand deposits. The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits increased 79 basis points from 1.41%~~ for the six months ended June 30, ~~2018 to~~2020, and the average interest rate paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased 58 basis points from 2.20% for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019.~~2019 to 1.62% for the six months ended June 30, 2020. The average cost of deposits during the six months ended June 30, 2020 was impacted by decreases in interest rates paid on money market and time deposits as a result of the decrease in market interest rates.

The following table sets forth our average balances of assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity, in addition to the major components of net interest income and our net interest margin, for the three months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

	Three Months Ended June 30,																Three Months Ended June 30,
	2019								2018								2020								2019
(In thousands, except percentages)	Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield			Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield			Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield			Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield
Assets
Interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold		14,439			87		2.42	%		10,210			46		1.81	%	$	77,139		$	19		0.10	%	$	14,439		$	87		2.42	%
Securities		21,703			205		3.79	%		21,764			223		4.11	%		24,281			210		3.48			21,703			205		3.79
Loans, net of unearned discount ⁽¹⁾		259,505			4,174		6.45	%		226,784			3,277		5.80	%		376,803			4,493		4.80			259,505			4,174		6.45
Total earning assets	$	295,647		$	4,466		6.06	%	$	258,758		$	3,546		5.50	%		478,223			4,722		3.97			295,647			4,466		6.06
Cash and other assets		30,223								26,328								29,830								30,223
Allowance for loan losses		(954	)							(567	)							(2,216	)							(954	)
Total assets	$	324,916							$	284,519							$	505,837							$	324,916
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Savings and interest-bearing demand	$	7,496			7		0.37	%	$	8,836			9		0.41	%	$	10,036			8		0.32	%	$	7,496			7		0.37	%
Money market deposit accounts		63,562			236		1.49	%		49,240			134		1.09	%		101,161			98		0.39			63,562			236		1.49
Time deposits		145,503			955		2.63	%		131,051			568		1.74	%		242,220			1,107		1.84			145,503			955		2.63
Total interest-bearing deposits		216,561			1,198		2.22	%		189,127			711		1.51	%		353,417			1,213		1.38			216,561			1,198		2.22
FHLB and other borrowings		7,808			64		3.29	%		15,456			95		2.47	%		27,093			27		0.40			7,808			64		3.29
Subordinated notes		12,000			220		7.35	%		12,000			219		7.32	%		12,000			219		7.34			12,000			220		7.35
Total interest-bearing liabilities		236,369			1,482		2.51	%		216,583			1,025		1.90	%		392,510			1,459		1.50			236,369			1,482		2.51
Non-interest-bearing deposits		34,242								34,831								54,009								34,242
Other liabilities		5,929								3,517								6,477								5,929
Total liabilities		277,299								254,899								452,996								277,299
Shareholders’ equity		48,376								29,588								52,841								48,376
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	324,916							$	284,519							$	505,837							$	324,916

Net interest income				$	2,984							$	2,521							$	3,263							$	2,984
Net interest spread							3.54	%							3.60	%							2.47	%							3.55	%
Net interest margin							4.05	%							3.91	%							2.74	%							4.05	%

The following table sets forth our average balances of assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity, in addition to the major components of net interest income and our net interest margin, for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

	Six Months Ended June 30,																Six Months Ended June 30,
	2019								2018								2020								2019
(In thousands, except percentages)	Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield			Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield			Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield			Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield
Assets
Interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold		12,813			155		2.44	%		9,746			82		1.70	%	$	50,471		$	82		0.33	%	$	12,813		$	155		2.44	%
Securities		21,834			414		3.82	%		21,690			470		4.37	%		23,073			522		4.55			21,834			414		3.82
Loans, net of unearned discount ⁽¹⁾		255,433			8,005		6.32	%		223,520			6,470		5.84	%		337,100			9,234		5.51			255,433			8,005		6.32
Total earning assets	$	290,080		$	8,574		5.96	%	$	254,956		$	7,022		5.55	%		410,644			9,838		4.82			290,080			8,574		5.96
Cash and other assets		29,742								29,474								29,309								29,742
Allowance for loan losses		(915	)							(479	)							(1,820	)							(915	)
Total assets	$	318,907							$	283,951							$	438,133							$	318,907
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Savings and interest-bearing demand	$	7,335			14		0.38	%	$	8,670			18		0.42	%	$	9,646			18		0.37	%	$	7,335			14		0.38	%
Money market deposit accounts		58,692			434		1.49	%		49,568			239		0.97	%		82,456			297		0.72			58,692			434		1.49
Time deposits		148,350			1,896		2.58	%		129,726			1,059		1.65	%		215,018			2,156		2.02			148,350			1,896		2.58
Total interest-bearing deposits		214,377			2,344		2.20	%		187,964			1,316		1.41	%		307,120			2,471		1.62			214,377			2,344		2.20
FHLB and other borrowings		8,395			136		3.27	%		17,034			203		2.40	%		15,643			50		0.64			8,395			136		3.27
Subordinated notes		12,000			438		7.36	%		10,450			381		7.35	%		12,000			437		7.32			12,000			438		7.36
Total interest-bearing liabilities		234,772			2,918		2.51	%		215,448			1,900		1.78	%		334,763			2,958		1.78			234,772			2,918		2.51
Non-interest-bearing deposits		36,451								31,883								45,034								36,451
Other liabilities		5,465								3,769								6,718								5,465
Total liabilities		276,688								251,132								386,515								276,688
Shareholders’ equity		42,219								32,851								51,618								42,219
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	318,907							$	283,951							$	438,133							$	318,907

Net interest income				$	5,656							$	5,122							$	6,880							$	5,656
Net interest spread							3.45	%							3.78	%							3.04	%							3.45	%
Net interest margin							3.93	%							4.05	%							3.37	%							3.93	%

We determined a provision for loan losses that we consider sufficient to maintain an allowance to absorb probable losses inherent in our portfolio as of the balance sheet date. For additional information concerning this determination, see the section captioned “Allowance for Loan Losses” elsewhere in this discussion.

For the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the provision for loan losses totaled ~~$400,000~~$475,000 and ~~$483,000,~~$1.3 million, respectively, compared to ~~$77,000~~$400,000 and ~~$321,000~~$483,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018, respectively.~~2019. See the section captioned “Allowance for Loan Losses” included elsewhere in this discussion for further analysis of the provision for loan losses.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2019		2018		2019		2018		2020		2019		2020		2019
Trust income	$	1,250	$	1,170	$	2,431	$	2,330	$	1,196	$	1,250	$	2,472	$	2,431
Gain on sale of loans										-		-		432		-
Advisory income		2,466		2,040		4,668		4,039		2,311		2,466		4,805		4,668
Brokerage income		2,894		1,897		4,956		4,314		1,790		2,894		3,861		4,956
Service fees and other income		1,096		212		2,734		2,004		1,222		1,096		2,959		2,734
Rental income		81		71		163		142		57		81		148		163
Total	$	7,787	$	5,390	$	14,952	$	12,829	$	6,576	$	7,787	$	14,677	$	14,952

Total non-interest income for the three ~~months ended June 30, 2019 increased $2.4 million, or 44.5%,~~ and ~~$2.1 million, or 16.6%, for the~~ six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 decreased $1.2 million, or 15.6%, and $275,000, or 1.8%, compared to the same periods in the prior year, respectively. ~~Changes~~Material changes in the various components of non-interest income are discussed below.

Trust Income. Trust income is earned for trust services on the value of managed and non-managed assets held in custody. ~~The volatility of~~Volatility in the bond and equity markets impacts the market value of trust assets and the related fees. Trust income for the three ~~months~~ and six months ended June 30, ~~2019 increased $80,000, or 6.9%, and $101,000,~~2020 decreased $54,000, or 4.3%, ~~respectively,~~and increased $41,000, or 1.7%, compared to the same periods in the prior year, respectively. The variance in the fee income ~~increased slightly~~ between the ~~two~~ periods is due to a ~~slight~~decrease in the average market value of the trust assets during the three months ended June 30, 2020, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2019, combined with a slightly larger increase in the average market value of the trust assets during the first quarter of 2020 compared with the same period in the prior year, which slightly offset the decrease in the second quarter. The economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has increased market volatility, which has resulted in a decrease in our assets held in custody, which may be sustained and could materially worsen, decreasing trust income.

Gain on sale of loans. Gain on sale of loans is generally gain on sales of the guaranteed portion of loans within our SBA loan portfolio. There was no gain on sale of loans for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019. Gain on sale of loans for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019, compared to~~2020 was $432,000, resulting from the sale of $6.2 million of SBA loans. There were no loan sales for the same ~~periods~~period in the prior ~~year, and also due to fees for our participant directed platform which was implemented in the first quarter of 2019.~~year.

Advisory income. Advisory fees are typically based on a percentage of the underlying average asset values for a given period, where each percentage point represents 100 basis points. These revenues are of a recurring nature, but are directly affected by increases and decreases in the values of the underlying assets. For the three ~~months~~ and six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, advisory income ~~increased $426,000,~~decreased $155,000, or ~~20.9%~~6.3%, and ~~$629,000,~~increased $137,000, or ~~15.6%~~2.9%, ~~respectively,~~ compared to the same periods in the prior year, respectively. ~~This increase was~~The decrease in advisory income for the three month period is due to a ~~slight increase~~decrease in the average market value of the ~~trust~~advisory assets during the three ~~and~~months ended June 30, 2020, compared to the same period in the prior year. This decrease during this three month period was slightly offset by an increase in advisory income during the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to the same period in the prior year, which combined resulted in a net increase in advisory income for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 compared to the same ~~periods~~period in the prior ~~year, combined with an increase~~year. Similar to our trust income, any decrease in ~~advisory income at Sanders Morris, both from an increase in their~~the value our assets under management will result in a comparable decrease in our advisory income. The economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has increased market volatility, which has resulted in a decrease in our assets under management, which may be sustained and ~~from increases in performance based fees, which remain a relatively small portion of our~~could materially worsen, decreasing advisory income.

Brokerage income. Brokerage revenues are generally based on a per share fee or commission to trade a share of a particular stock, bond or other security. In addition, brokerage revenues, in this context, include private placements, participation in syndication of public offerings, and certain other brokerage revenues, including interest earned on margin lending. Brokerage revenue is dependent on the volume of trading, and on private placement and syndication activity during the period. Brokerage income for the three ~~months~~ and six months ended June 30, ~~2019 increased $997,000,~~2020 decreased $1.1 million, or ~~52.6%~~38.1%, and ~~$642,000,~~$1.1 million, or ~~14.9%~~22.1%, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. ~~These increases are primarily due~~The economic disruption related to ~~increases~~the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a dramatic slowing of activity in private ~~placement~~placements and syndicated public offerings, on which margins have historically been higher. This activity ~~and in interest earned on margin lending,~~may face a prolonged recovery, materially decreasing brokerage income. During the first quarter 2020, this effect was offset by ~~the planned termination~~a temporary increase in certain segments of ~~an agreement with a former affiliate to assist with transition of its business, and a slight decrease in general~~ trading activity ~~especially during~~which are typically done at lower margins. This increase was not sustained into the ~~first~~second quarter.

The chart below reflects our advisory and brokerage assets as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, December 31, ~~2018~~2019 and June 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

(in thousands)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		June 30, 2018
(In thousands)							June 30, 2020		December 31, 2019		June 30, 2019
Advisory assets
Tectonic Advisors	$	1,959,392	$	1,736,637		1,762,994	$	2,020,209	$	2,057,570	$	1,959,393
Sanders Morris		400,972		282,052		262,694		520,284		560,820		400,972
Total advisory assets	$	2,360,364	$	2,018,689		2,025,688	$	2,540,493	$	2,618,390	$	2,360,365

Brokerage assets – Sanders Morris		1,372,882		1,297,264		1,572,269	$	1,286,924	$	1,426,828	$	1,372,881

Total advisory and brokerage assets	$	3,733,246	$	3,315,953	$	3,597,957	$	3,827,417	$	4,045,218	$	3,733,246

Service fees and other income. Service fees includes fees for deposit-related services, and ~~beginning in January 2019,~~ third party ~~administrative fees related to the acquisition of Nolan.~~administration fees. Service fees for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 increased ~~$884,000,~~$126,000, or ~~417.0%~~11.5%, and ~~$730,000,~~$225,000, or ~~36.4%~~8.2%, ~~respectively,~~ compared to the same ~~periods~~period in the prior ~~year, respectively, which was primarily due~~year. This is the result of an increase in other income related to ~~the administrative fees recorded for services provided by Nolan, offset by bargain purchase gain~~a non-recurring extinguishment of ~~$1.7 million that occurred~~a retirement liability during the ~~first quarter 2018,~~six months ended June 30, 2020 and ~~by a decrease in net loan servicing fees~~bad debt expense recognized during the ~~three and~~ six months ended June 30, 2019, ~~over~~partially offset by a decrease in third party administration fees. The decrease in third party administration fees is due to a lag in information from plan sponsors to complete annual plan administration work. The vast majority of Nolan’s plan administration clients are dental practices. Nolan believes that the ~~same~~timing lag is at least partially related to the shutdown of dental practices nationwide during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Company expects that there will be a lag in the timing of the completion of plan administration for 2020 compared to 2019, which would impact the timing of revenue recognition for third party administration fees compared to the corresponding periods in 2019, although the ~~prior year of $98,000 and $108,000, respectively.~~timing lag recovered somewhat during the three months ended June 30, 2020.

Rental income. The Company receives monthly rental income from tenants leasing space in the Bank building. Rental income for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019 increased $10,000,~~2020 decreased $24,000, or ~~14.1%~~29.6%, and ~~$21,000,~~$15,000, or ~~14.8%~~9.2%, ~~respectively,~~ compared to the same periods in the prior year, ~~respectively.~~due to the granting of rent abatements and one tenant’s lease reaching the end of its term and subsequent nonrewal.

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands)	2019		2018		2019		2018		2020		2019		2020		2019
Salaries and employee benefits	$	4,869	$	3,337	$	9,252	$	6,944	$	4,049	$	4,869	$	8,953	$	9,252
Occupancy and equipment		636		487		1,249		987		585		636		1,210		1,249
Trust expenses		499		490		976		989		372		499		927		976
Brokerage and advisory direct costs		451		323		870		788		560		451		1,046		870
Professional fees		418		191		863		369		284		418		676		863
Data processing		220		256		449		510		202		220		401		449
Other		679		619		1,309		1,228		611		679		1,273		1,309
Total	$	7,772	$	5,703	$	14,968	$	11,815	$	6,663	$	7,772	$	14,486	$	14,968

Total non-interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019 increased $2.1~~2020 decreased $1.1 million, or ~~336.3%~~14.3%, and ~~$3.2 million,~~$482,000, or ~~26.7%~~3.2%, ~~respectively,~~ compared to the same periods in the prior ~~year. Changes~~year, primarily due to decreases in salaries and employee benefits, trust expenses and professional fees, other expenses, and depreciation expense within occupancy and equipment, partly offset by increases in brokerage and advisory direct costs. Material changes in the various components of non-interest income are discussed below.

Salaries and employee benefits. Salaries and employee benefits for three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019 increased $1.5 million,~~2020 decreased $820,000, or ~~46.0%~~16.8%, and ~~$2.3 million,~~decreased $299,000, or ~~33.2%~~3.2%, compared to the same period in the prior year. The decreases were due to decreases in commissions, earnouts and incentive bonuses of $496,000 and $155,000 within our other financial services segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, primarily related to decreases in brokerage activity, including private placement activity, at Sanders Morris, compared to the same periods in the prior ~~year. The acquisition~~year, and decreases in salaries and employee benefits in our Banking segment of ~~Nolan accounted for $872,000 of the increases~~$408,000 and $317,000 for the three ~~months ended June 30, 2019~~ and ~~$1.6 million for the~~ six months ended June 30, ~~2019. The remaining increase was due~~2020, respectively, resulting from recording a portion of fees received from the SBA as an offset to ~~an increase in the number of employees in loan production and operation support areas of the Company, and in the trust area~~employee costs related to ~~the addition~~origination of participant directed plan services, combined with increases in commissions and incentive bonuses related to increases in brokerage activity and advisory fees at Sanders Morris, particularly in our Dallas office, andPPP loans, partly offset by annual merit increases and ~~rate increases for medical benefits.~~increase in staff. These decreases were partially offset by a change to the manner in which our chief executive officer was paid, which increase was entirely offset by a reduction in management fees noted below under other expense (resulting in no additional amount being paid to our chief executive officer).

Occupancy and equipment expense. Occupancy and equipment expense for three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019 increased $149,000,~~2020 decreased $51,000, or ~~30.6%~~8.0%, and ~~$262,000,~~decreased $39,000, or ~~26.6%~~3.1%, ~~respectively,~~ compared to the same periods in the prior ~~year. The acquisition~~year, primarily due to a group of ~~Nolan accounted for $99,000 of the increase for~~fixed assets and software costs reaching full depreciation/amortization during the three months ended June 30, 2019 and $170,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2109. The remaining increase is related to increased rent and utilities expense at Tectonic Advisors and Sanders Morris, and an increase in depreciation expense related to the addition of Nolan and improvements to our Houston office.2020.

Trust expenses. Trust expenses are advisory fees paid to a fund advisor to advise the Company on the common trust funds managed by the Company, and are based on the value of the assets held in custody. ~~The volatility of~~Volatility in the bond and equity markets impacts the market value of trust assets and the related expenses. The monthly advisory fees are assessed based on the market value of assets at month-end. Trust expenses ~~increased $9,000,~~decreased $127,000, or ~~1.8%~~25.5%, and decreased $49,000, or 5.0%, for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019, compared to the same period in the prior year,~~2020, respectively, due to a ~~slight increase~~decrease in the ~~month-end~~ market value of trust assets for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019. Trust expenses decreased $13,000, or 1.3%, for~~2020 over that during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, compared to the same period in the prior year, due to a decrease in the month-end market value of trust assets during the three months ended March 31, 2019, which was partially offset by the increase during the three months ended June 30, 2019.as discussed under Non-Interest Income and within COVID-19 Update, above.

Brokerage and advisory direct costs. Brokerage and advisory direct costs for three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 increased ~~$128,000,~~$109,000, or ~~39.6%~~24.2%, and ~~$82,000,~~increased $176,000, or ~~10.4%~~20.2%, ~~respectively,~~ compared to the same periods in the prior year, related primarily to volume increases in certain segments of brokerage activity driven by market volatility, leading to increases in ~~brokerage activity and related~~ticket based charges, as well as clearing firm ~~service fees, execution charges~~ and ~~referral~~other service fees. These increases were ~~partially~~slightly offset by nominal decreases in ~~exchange clearing~~information services and referral fees.

Professional fees. Professional fees, which include legal, consulting, audit and professional fees, for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019 increased $227,000,~~2020 decreased $134,000, or ~~118.9%~~32.1%, and ~~$494,000,~~decreased $187,000, or ~~134.1%~~21.7%, ~~respectively,~~ compared to the same periods in the prior year. The ~~increases~~decreases were the result of decreases in legal and audit fees related to the acquisition of Nolan during the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2019, ~~included $78,000~~ and ~~$156,000, respectively, related to~~ the ~~consulting arrangement with the previous owner~~preparation of ~~Nolan (see Note 18, Nolan Acquisition, to consolidated financial statements included~~our Registration Statement filed in the Form 10-Q for more information), $37,000 and $89,000, respectively, for increase in consulting expense related to the implementation of the participant directed retirement plan platform for trust clients, $2,000 and $31,000, respectively, in consulting expenses at Tectonic AdvisorsApril 2019 related to our ~~advisory platform, $13,000~~initial public offering, and ~~$5,000, respectively, for net increase~~decreases in ~~legal and professional~~ expenses related to legal and regulatory matters at Sanders ~~Morris,~~Morris. These decreases were slightly offset by increases in legal and ~~$87,000 and $168,000, respectively,~~professional fees for our annual audit and ~~tax fees related to our IPO Registration Statement and related public~~periodic SEC filings. ~~The remaining increases are related to various professional fees directly affected by increased staff levels, among other things.~~

Data processing. Data processing includes costs related to the Company’s operating systems. Data processing expense for three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 decreased ~~$36,000,~~$18,000, or ~~14.1%~~8.2%, and ~~$61,000,~~decreased $48,000, or ~~12.0%~~10.7%, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. The ~~decrease was~~decreases were due to lower trust data processing ~~fees~~for discounts received for the six months ended June 30, 2020, and decreases in data processing and operating systems at Sanders Morris and Tectonic Advisors related to the ~~merger~~completion of ~~ten common funds with other funds~~initiatives undertaken during 2018 ~~partly offset by an increase of $12,000 related to the acquisition of Nolan.~~and early 2019.

Other. Other expenses include costs for insurance, ~~FDIC~~Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) assessments, director fees, regulatory filing fees related to our brokerage business, business travel, management fees, and other operational expenses. Other expenses for three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019 increased $60,000,~~2020 decreased $68,000, or ~~9.7%~~10.0%, and ~~$81,000,~~decreased $36,000, or ~~6.6%~~2.8%, ~~respectively,~~ compared to the same periods in the prior year. ~~The~~Decreases in these costs were primarily related to decreases in management fees to third parties, which are related to the change in the manner in which our chief executive officer was paid as discussed above within salaries and employee benefits, and decreases in travel, meals, and entertainment costs related to decreased brokerage and private placement activity. These decreases were somewhat offset by increases ~~included $21,000~~in our directors’ and ~~$34,000, respectively, for Nolan expenses, $20,000~~officers’ insurance costs as a result of our status as a public filing entity, increases in internet costs related to ~~reimburse losses~~increasing bandwidth to ~~a Bank customer account due to fraudulent activity by an employee of the customer during the first quarter 2019,~~accommodate network changes at Sanders Morris and Tectonic Advisors, and increases in ~~office expenses, employee recruitment, business travel,~~compliance and internet charges, related to increased staffing. These increases were partly offset by a $20,000 decrease in FDIC insurance premiums, a $4,000 decrease in public relations, and decreases in computer expense, management fees, filing fees, and general operating costs.advertising costs at Sanders Morris.

The income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 was $587,000 and $1.3 million, respectively, compared to $407,000 and $771,000 ~~respectively, compared to $219,000 and $376,000~~ for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018, respectively.~~2019. The effective income tax rate was ~~15.6%~~21.7% and ~~15.0%~~22.3% for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, respectively compared to ~~10.3%~~15.7% and ~~6.5%~~15.0% for the same periods in the prior year. The effective income tax rate differed from the U.S. statutory rate of 21% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, primarily due to Tectonic Advisors and Sanders ~~Morris~~Morris’ tax status as partnerships for the periods prior to May 13, 2019, the date the Tectonic Merger was completed.

We have three operating segments: Banking, Other Financial Services and HoldCo. Our primary operating segments are Banking and Other Financial Services.

Our Banking operating segment includes both commercial and consumer banking services. Commercial banking services are provided primarily to small to medium-sized businesses and their employees, which includes a wide array of lending and cash management products. Consumer banking services include lending and depository services.

Our Other Financial Services segment includes Tectonic Advisors, Sanders Morris, the Bank’s Trust Division, which includes a TPA services unit, and HWG. Through these business divisions, we offer investment advisory and brokerage services to individuals and businesses, private trust services, and financial management services, including personal wealth management, retirement plan design and administrative services, and insurance brokerage services.

A third operating segment, HoldCo, includes the Bank’s immediate parent and related subordinated debt, as well as operations of the financial holding company that serves as ~~TBI’s parent.~~parent for the group overall. Our principal source of revenue is dividends from our subsidiaries.

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019									Six Months Ended June 30, 2019									Three Months Ended June 30, 2020									Six Months Ended June 30, 2020
(In thousands)	Banking		Other Financial Services		HoldCo			Consolidated		Banking		Other Financial Services		HoldCo			Consolidated		Banking		Other Financial Services		HoldCo			Consolidated		Banking		Other Financial Services		HoldCo			Consolidated
Revenue(1)	$	3,296	$	7,696	$	(221	)	$	10,771	$	6,208	$	14,851	$	(451	)	$	20,608	$	3,672	$	6,363	$	(196	)	$	9,839	$	7,970	$	14,002	$	(415	)	$	21,557
Income before taxes	$	982	$	2,045	$	(428	)	$	2,599	$	1,810	$	4,138	$	(791	)	$	5,157
Income (loss) before taxes																			$	1,736	$	1,395	$	(430	)	$	2,701	$	3,121	$	3,576	$	(889	)	$	5,808

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018									Six Months Ended June 30, 2018								Three Months Ended June 30, 2019									Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
(In thousands)	Banking		Other Financial Services		HoldCo			Consolidated		Banking		Other Financial Services		HoldCo		Consolidated		Banking		Other Financial Services		HoldCo			Consolidated		Banking		Other Financial Services		HoldCo			Consolidated
Revenue(1)	$	2,929	$	5,230	$	(247	)	$	7,911	$	5,733	$	10,978	$	1,240	$	17,951	$	3,296	$	7,696	$	(221	)	$	10,771	$	6,208	$	14,851	$	(451	)	$	20,608
Income before taxes	$	908	$	1,575	$	(352	)	$	2,131	$	1,505	$	3,225	$	1,085	$	5,815
Income (loss) before taxes																		$	982	$	2,045	$	(428	)	$	2,599	$	1,810	$	4,138	$	(791	)	$	5,157

~~Net income~~Income before ~~income~~ taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 increased ~~$73,000,~~$754,000, or ~~8.1%~~76.8%, and increased ~~$306,000,~~$1.3 million, or ~~20.4%~~72.4%, respectively, compared to the same periods in ~~2018.~~the prior year. The increase during the three months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 was primarily the result of a ~~$454,000~~$259,000 increase in net interest income, a $117,000 increase in non-interest income and a ~~$30,000~~$454,000 decrease in non-interest expense, partly offset by a ~~$323,000~~$75,000 increase in the provision for loan ~~losses and an $87,000 decrease in non-interest income.~~losses. The increase during the six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 was primarily the result of a ~~$560,000~~$1.2 million increase in net interest income, a $582,000 increase in non-interest income and a $329,000 decrease in non-interest expense, partly offset by ~~an $85,000 decrease in non-interest income,~~ a ~~$162,000~~$780,000 increase in the provision for loan ~~losses and a $6,000 increase in non-interest expense.~~losses.

Net interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 increased ~~$454,000,~~$259,000, or ~~16.4%~~8.0%, and ~~$560,000,~~$1.2 million, or ~~10.0%~~19.2%, respectively, compared to the same periods in ~~2018,~~the prior year, due ~~primarily~~ to an increase in the average volume of loans and a decrease in average rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and borrowings, partly offset by a decrease in average yields on ~~loans, partially offset by~~earning assets and increase in average volume of interest-bearing deposits and ~~average rates paid on interest-bearing deposits.~~borrowings. See the analysis of net interest income included in the section captioned “Net Interest Income” included elsewhere in this discussion.

The provision for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, totaled $475,000 and $1.3 million, respectively, compared to $400,000 and $483,000 ~~respectively, compared to $77,000 and $321,000~~ for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. See “Allowance for Loan Losses” included elsewhere in this discussion.

Non-interest income for the three months ended June 30, ~~2019 decreased $87,000,~~2020 increased $117,000, or ~~54.0%~~158.1%, and ~~$85,000,~~$582,000, or ~~54.5%,~~819.7% for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, compared to the same periods in the prior year, ~~respectively, which was~~respectively. The increases were primarily due to ~~decreases~~a $141,000 increase in net loan servicing ~~income. The decrease was~~income, partly offset ~~increases~~by a $24,000 decrease in rental income for the three months ended June 30, 2020, and a $432,000 increase in gain on sale of assets and a $165,000 increase in net loan servicing income, partly offset by a $15,000 decrease in rental income. The increase in net loan servicing income was the result of reversing the allowance valuation allowance for loan servicing assets during the three months ended June 30, 2020. See the analysis of non-interest income included in the section captioned “Non-Interest Income” included elsewhere in this discussion.

Non-interest expense for the three months ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 decreased ~~$30,000,~~$454,000, or ~~1.5%~~23.7%, and decreased $329,000, or 8.4% for the six months ended June 30, ~~2019 increased $6,000, or 0.2%,~~2020 compared to the same periods in the prior year, respectively. The ~~decrease for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was related~~decreases were primarily due to ~~decreases~~a $408,000 decrease in salaries and employee benefits resulting from recording a portion of fees received from the SBA to offset employee costs to originate PPP loans, partly offset by annual merit increases and increase in staff, and also to a decrease in professional fees related to the acquisition of the Nolan business and ~~data processing.~~other new business activity during the three months ended March 31, 2019. See the analysis of non-interest expense included in the section captioned “Non-Interest Expense” included elsewhere in this discussion.

~~Net income~~Income before ~~income~~ taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019 increased $470,000,~~2020 decreased $650,000, or ~~29.8%~~31.8%, and ~~increased $914,000,~~decreased $562,000, or ~~28.3%~~13.6%, respectively, compared to the same periods in ~~2018.~~the prior year. The ~~increase~~decreases during the three ~~months ended June 30, 2019 was primarily the result of a $2.5 million increase in non-interest income partly offset by a $2.0 million increase in non-interest expense. The increase during the~~and six months ended June 30, ~~2019 was~~2020 were primarily the result of ~~a $3.9~~decreases of $1.3 million ~~increase~~and $850,000 in non-interest income, ~~partly~~ offset by ~~a $3.0 million increase~~decreases of $682,000 and $288,000 in non-interest ~~expense~~expense.

Non-interest income for the three ~~months ended June 30, 2019 increased $2.5 million, or 47.2%,~~ and ~~$3.9 million, or 35.3%, for the~~ six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 decreased $1.3 million, or 17.3%, and decreased $850,000, or 5.7%, compared to the same periods in the prior year, respectively. The ~~increases~~decreases were primarily due to ~~increases~~a decrease in brokerage income of ~~$996,000~~$1.1 million and ~~$642,000 related to increased trading activity~~a decrease in advisory income of $155,000 during the three months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020. These decreases were offset by an increase in advisory income of $292,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2020, related to increases in service fees and other income of $964,000 and $2.5 million, respectively, which was primarily related to the Nolan acquisition on January 2, 2019, and advisory income and trust income related to increased average market value of trust assets, and increases in advisory assets under management at Sanders Morris and Tectonic Advisors experience during the period, and an increase in services fees and other income of ~~$506,000~~$86,000, related to an increase in other income related to a non-recurring extinguishment of a retirement liability during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and ~~$730,000, respectively.~~

bad debt expense recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2019. See the analysis of non-interest income included in the section captioned “Non-Interest Income” included elsewhere in this discussion.

Non-interest expense for the three ~~months ended June 30, 2019 increased $2.0 million, or 54.7%,~~ and ~~$3.0 million, or 38.2%, for the~~ six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 decreased $682,000, or 12.1%, and decreased $288,000, or 2.7%, respectively, compared to the same periods in the prior year. These decreases were related to decreases in salaries and employee benefits of $496,000 and $155,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, primarily related to decreases in brokerage activity, including private placement activity, at Sanders Morris leading to decreased commissions, earnouts and incentive bonuses compared to the same periods in the prior year, ~~respectively. The increases were primarily~~partially offset by staffing additions at Nolan to add capacity for additional plan administration work. In addition, trust expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 decreased by $127,000 and $49,000, respectively, related to ~~increases~~decreases in ~~salaries~~the underlying assets under management on which those fees are based primarily during the three months ended June 30, 2020, and ~~employee benefits, as well as increases~~decreases in occupancy and equipment ~~costs~~expenses of $76,000 and $73,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, respectively, related to software that became fully depreciated as of April 2020. The remaining variances for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 related to decreases in professional fees, ~~related to the acquisition of the Nolan business~~data processing and other ~~new business activity, as well as annual merit increases. Brokerage~~expenses, offset by increases in brokerage and advisory direct costs, ~~showed~~from increases ~~primarily from increased~~in certain segments of brokerage ~~activity.~~activity and related exchange and clearing firm service fees, referral fees, and information services expense. See the analysis of non-interest income included in the section captioned “Non-Interest Expense” included elsewhere in this discussion.

~~The HoldCo operating segment had net losses~~Loss before income tax of $428,000 and $791,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, respectively, compared to net loss before income tax of $352,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2018 and net income before income tax of $1.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018. The increased net loss before income taxes for the three months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020 increased $2,000, or 0.5%, and increased $98,000, or 12.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2020, compared to the same ~~period~~periods in the prior ~~year resulted from increases in non-interest expense~~year. The increase for the six months ended June 30, 2020 was due to increases in salaries and compensation expense of $173,000 other expenses of $28,000, partly offset by ~~decrease~~decreases in interest expense ~~related to the payoff~~on borrowings of ~~the bank stock loan in May 2019. The net income before income taxes for the three~~$50,000 and ~~six months ended June 30, 2018 was primarily related to a gain on bargain purchase~~professional fees of ~~$1.7 million related to the acquisition of Summer Wealth Management during the first quarter of 2018.~~$67,000.

The primary purpose of the Company’s investment portfolio is to provide a source of earnings for liquidity management purposes, to provide collateral to pledge against borrowings, and to control interest rate risk. In managing the portfolio, the Company seeks to attain the objectives of safety of principal, liquidity, diversification, and maximized return on investment.

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, securities available for sale consisted of U.S. government agency securities and mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Securities held to maturity consisted of Property Assessed Clean Energy investments. These investment contracts or bonds, located in California and Florida, originate under a contractual obligation between the property owners, the local county administration, and a third-party administrator and sponsor. The assessments are created to fund the purchase and installation of energy saving improvements to the property, such as solar panels. Generally, as a property assessment, the total assessment is repaid in installments over a period of 10 to 15 years by the then current property owner(s). Each installment is collected by the County Tax Collector where the property is located. The assessments are an obligation of the property. Each assessment is equal in priority to the other property taxes and assessments associated with the property, including local school, city, and county ad-valorem taxes.

~~Restricted securities consisted of FRB stock, having an amortized cost and fair value of $980,450 as~~As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Bank held FRB stock in the amount of $1.2 million and FHLB stock ~~having an amortized cost and fair value~~in the amount of ~~$959,400 and $945,900~~$1.2 million, all of which was classified as ~~of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.~~restricted securities.

Securities not readily marketable consists of an income interest in a private investment.

The weighted average yield for total securities was 3.82% for the six months ended June 30, 2019, compared to 4.37% for the same period in the prior year. The yield was lower for the six months ended June 30, 2019 primarily due to the payoff in 2018 of two PACE assets totaling $1.0 million with a weighted average rate of 7.08%. Both PACE assets earned interest through June 2018.

~~The~~ following table presents the amortized cost and fair values of the securities portfolio as of the dates indicated:

	As of June 30, 2019				As of December 31, 2018				As of June 30, 2020				As of December 31, 2019
(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government agencies	$	8,945	$	8,998	$	9,233	$	9,008	$	10,091	$	10,157	$	10,684	$	10,731
Mortgage-backed securities		2,034		2,053		2,536		2,496		2,781		2,873		1,925		1.946
Total securities available for sale	$	10,979	$	11,051	$	11,769	$	11,504	$	12,872	$	13,030	$	12,609	$	12,677

Securities held to maturity:
Property assessed clean energy	$	7,474	$	7,474	$	7,722	$	7,722	$	5,827	$	5,827	$	6,349	$	6,349

Securities, restricted:
Other	$	1,940	$	1,940	$	1,926	$	1,926	$	2,429	$	2,429	$	2,417	$	2,417

Securities not readily marketable	$	100	$	100	$	100	$	100	$	100	$	100	$	100	$	100

The following table summarizes the maturity distribution schedule with corresponding weighted-average yields of securities available for sale and securities held to maturity as of June 30, ~~2019.~~2020. Yields are calculated based on amortized cost. Mortgage-backed securities are included in maturity categories based on their stated maturity date. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations. Other securities classified as restricted include stock in the FRB and the FHLB, which have no maturity date. These securities have been included in the total column only and are not included in the total yield.

	Maturing																									Maturing
						After One Year					After Five Years																				After One Year					After Five Years
	One Year					Through					Through					After										One Year					Through					Through					After
	or Less					Five Years					Ten Years					Ten Years					Total					or Less					Five Years					Ten Years					Ten Years					Total
(In thousands, except percentages)	Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield			Amount		Yield
Securities available for sale:
U.S. government agencies	$	-		-	%	$	5,615		2.53	%	$	2,992		2.66	%	$	338		3.62	%	$	8,945		2.62	%	$	-		-	%	$	1,799		2.01	%	$	7,000		1.62	%	$	1,292		1.85	%	$	10,091		1.72	%
Mortgage-backed securities		-		-			-		-			1,242		2.78			792		2.64			2,034		2.73			-		-			195		3.25			931		2.83			1,655		2.30			2,781		2.55
Total	$	-		-	%	$	5,615		2.53	%	$	4,234		2.69	%	$	1,130		2.93	%	$	10,979		2.64	%	$	-		-	%	$	1,994		2.13	%	$	7,931		1.77	%	$	2,947		2.10	%	$	12,872		1.90	%
Securities held to maturity:
Property assessed clean energy	$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	3,937		5.84	%	$	3,537		7.24	%	$	7,474		6.50	%	$	-		-	%	$	556		6.34	%	$	2,479		5.71	%	$	2,792		7.32	%	$	5,827		6.54	%
Securities, restricted:
Other	$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	1,940		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	2,429		-	%
Securities not readily marketable	$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	100		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	100		-	%

Total loans excluding allowance for loan losses, increased ~~$19.2~~$103.7 million, or ~~8.2%~~35.6%, to ~~$254.1~~$394.8 million at June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, compared to ~~$234.9~~$291.1 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The increase includes PPP loans totaling $98.3 million. SBA loans comprise the largest group of loans in our portfolio totaling ~~$108.2~~$236.7 million, or ~~42.6%~~60.0% of the total loans at June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, compared to ~~$91.6~~$139.7 million, or ~~39.0%~~48.0% at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Commercial and industrial loans totaled ~~$89.1~~$86.3 million, or ~~35.5%~~21.9% of the total loans at June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, compared to ~~$88.9~~$85.5 million, or ~~37.9%~~29.4%, at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Commercial and construction real estate loans totaled ~~$45.2~~$60.2 million, or ~~17.8%~~15.3%, of the total loans at June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, compared to ~~$39.9~~$54.8 million, or ~~17.0%~~18.8%, at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

The following table sets forth the composition of our loans held for investment:

(In thousands, except percentages)	June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018				June 30, 2020				December 31, 2019
Commercial and industrial	$	89,075	35.0	%	$	88,915	37.9	%	$	86,311	21.9	%	$	85,476	29.4	%
Consumer installment		3,768	1.5	%		3,636	1.5	%		5,717	1.4			3,409	1.2
Real estate – residential		5,383	2.1	%		7,488	3.2	%		4,999	1.3			5,232	1.8
Real estate – commercial		38,500	15.1	%		35,221	15.0	%		50,082	12.7			46,981	16.1
Real estate – construction and land		6,735	2.7	%		4,653	2.0	%		10,160	2.6			7,865	2.7
SBA 7(a) guaranteed		43,951	17.3	%		33,884	14.4	%		165,476	41.9			69,963	24.0
SBA 7(a) unguaranteed		45,014	17.7	%		44,326	18.9	%		46,778	11.8			47,132	16.2
SBA 504		19,260	7.6	%		13,400	5.7	%		24,446	6.2			22,591	7.8
USDA		2,448	1.0	%		3,367	1.4	%		799	0.2			2,430	0.8
Other		3	-	%		17	-	%		1	-			-	-
Total Loans	$	254,137	100.0	%	$	234,907	100.0	%	$	394,769	100.0	%	$	291,079	100.0	%

~~The~~At origination, the Company ~~records~~determines whether holding the guaranteed portion of ~~the~~ SBA 7(a) and USDA loans provide better long-term risk adjusted returns than selling the loans, and records as either held for investment or held for sale. The Company records held for sale loans at the lower of cost or fair value. Loans held for sale totaled ~~$17.9~~$11.6 million and ~~$16.3~~$9.9 million at June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company elected to reclassify ~~$12.7~~$5.8 million and $7.5 million, respectively, of the SBA 7(a) loans held for sale to held for investment. ~~The Company determined that holding these loans provides better long-term risk adjusted returns than selling the loans.~~

Loan concentrations are considered to exist when there are amounts loaned to multiple borrowers engaged in similar activities that would cause them to be similarly impacted by economic or other conditions. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, our loan portfolio included ~~$75.6~~$72.4 million of loans, approximately ~~29.8%~~18.3% of our total funded loans (24.4% of total funded loans, net of the PPP loans), to the dental industry, compared to ~~$76.2~~$69.2 million, or ~~32.4%~~23.8% of total funded loans, as of December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. We believe that these loans are to credit worthy borrowers and are diversified geographically.

In April 2020, we began originating loans to qualified small businesses under the PPP administered by the SBA under the provisions of the CARES Act. Loans covered by the PPP may be eligible for loan forgiveness for certain costs incurred related to payroll, group health care benefit costs and qualifying mortgage, rent and utility payments. The remaining loan balance after forgiveness of any amounts is still fully guaranteed by the SBA. Terms of the PPP loans include the following (i) maximum amount limited to the lesser of $10 million or an amount calculated using a payroll-based formula, (ii) maximum loan term of two years, (iii) interest rate of 1.00%, (iv) no collateral or personal guarantees are required, (v) no payments are required for six months following the loan disbursement date and (vi) loan forgiveness up to the full principal amount of the loan and any accrued interest, subject to certain requirements including that no more than 40% of the loan forgiveness amount may be attributable to non-payroll costs. In return for processing and booking the loan, the SBA will pay the lender a processing fee tiered by the size of the loan (5% for loans of not more than $350 thousand; 3% for loans more than $350 thousand and less than $2 million; and 1% for loans of at least $2 million). During the three months ended June 30, 2020, we originated $98.3 million of PPP loans, and received $4.4 million of related fees from the SBA. We deferred $3.4 million of the fees, net of $966,000 which represented costs incurred to originate these loans.

We are also participating in the PPPLF which, through September 30, 2020, will extend loans to banks who are loaning money to small businesses under the PPP. The total amount borrowed under the PPPLF as of June 30, 2020 was $33.9 million and is non-recourse and secured by an equal amount of the PPP loans we originated. The maturity date of a borrowing under the PPPLF is equal to the maturity date of the PPP loan pledged to secure the borrowing and would be accelerated (i) if the underlying PPP loan goes into default and is sold to the SBA to realize on the SBA guarantee or (ii) to the extent that any loan forgiveness reimbursement is received from the SBA. Borrowings under the PPPLF will bear interest at a rate of 0.35%. In addition, we may exclude all PPP loans pledged as collateral to the PPP Facility from our average total consolidated assets for the purposes of calculating our leverage ratio.

As of June 30, ~~2019, 42.3%~~2020, 33.2% of the loan portfolio, or ~~$107.5~~$130.9 million, matured or re-priced within one year or less. The following table presents the contractual maturity ranges for ~~commercial, consumer and real estate loans outstanding~~the loan portfolio as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, and also presents for each maturity range the portion of loans that have fixed interest rates or variable interest rates over the life of the loan in accordance with changes in the interest rate environment as represented by the base rate:

	As of June 30, 2019												As of June 30, 2020
			Over 1 Year through 5 Years				Over 5 Years								Over 1 Year through 5 Years				Over 5 Years
(In thousands)	One Year or Less		Fixed Rate		Floating or Adjustable Rate		Fixed Rate		Floating or Adjustable Rate		Total		One Year or Less		Fixed Rate		Floating or Adjustable Rate		Fixed Rate		Floating or Adjustable Rate		Total
Commercial and industrial	$	11,102	$	6,931	$	12,762	$	58,280	$	-	$	89,075	$	11,362	$	9,297	$	9,223	$	55,889	$	540	$	86,311
Consumer installment		2,861		383		-		524		-		3,768		3,505		2,212		-		-		-		5,717
Real estate – residential		1,406		3,977		-		-		-		5,383		1,348		3,651		-		-		-		4,999
Real estate – commercial		1,589		4,331		23,426		4,089		5,065		38,500		7,204		12,234		21,813		2,295		6,536		50,082
Real estate – construction and land		5,116		735		884		-		-		6,735		4,513		98		4,189		1,360		-		10,160
SBA 7(a) guaranteed		37,667		129		5,357		798		-		43,951		54,587		94,964		15,171		754		-		165,476
SBA 7(a) unguaranteed		39,026		43		3,851		2,094		-		45,014		40,618		34		5,638		488		-		46,778
SBA 504		6,312		-		11,859		-		1,089		19,260		6,975		-		16,403		-		1,068		24,446
USDA		2,448		-		-		-		-		2,448		799		-		-		-		-		799
Other		3		-		-		-		-		3		1		-		-		-		-		1
Total	$	107,530	$	16,529	$	58,139	$	65,785	$	6,154	$	254,137	$	130,912	$	122,490	$	72,437	$	60,786	$	8,144	$	394,769

	As of December 31, 2018												As of December 31, 2019
			Over 1 Year through 5 Years				Over 5 Years								Over 1 Year through 5 Years				Over 5 Years
(In thousands)	One Year or Less		Fixed Rate		Floating or Adjustable Rate		Fixed Rate		Floating or Adjustable Rate		Total		One Year or Less		Fixed Rate		Floating or Adjustable Rate		Fixed Rate		Floating or Adjustable Rate		Total
Commercial and industrial	$	9,471	$	7,541	$	16,400	$	55,503	$	-	$	88,915	$	15,117	$	7,060	$	8,880	$	54,419	$	-	$	85,476
Consumer installment		728		2,288		-		620		-		3,636		3,070		339		-		-		-		3,409
Real estate – residential		1,641		5,041		746		60		-		7,488		1,258		3,974		-		-		-		5,232
Real estate – commercial		3,184		4,422		19,074		3,146		5,395		35,221		4,602		12,974		21,287		1,998		6,120		46,981
Real estate – construction and land		3,912		741		-		-		-		4,653		4,121		99		3,645		-		-		7,865
SBA 7(a) guaranteed		29,082		141		4,091		570		-		33,884		59,065		115		10,004		779		-		69,963
SBA 7(a) unguaranteed		39,947		47		2,306		776		1,250		44,326		42,094		38		4,498		502		-		47,132
SBA 504		4,226		-		8,074		-		1,100		13,400		8,456		-		11,747		-		2,388		22,591
USDA		2,432		-		935		-		-		3,367		2,430		-		-		-		-		2,430
Other		17		-		-		-		-		17		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	94,640	$	20,221	$	51,626	$	60,675	$	7,745	$	234,907	$	140,213	$	24,599	$	60,061	$	57,698	$	8,508	$	291,079

Scheduled contractual principal repayments of loans do not reflect the actual life of such assets. The average life of loans is less than their average contractual terms due to prepayments.

Loans acquired in acquisitions are initially recorded at fair value with no carryover of the related allowance for credit losses. The fair value of the loans is determined using market participant assumptions in estimating the amount and timing of principal and interest cash flows initially expected to be collected on the loans and discounting those cash flows at an appropriate market rate of interest.

Under the accounting model for acquired loans, the excess of cash flows expected to be collected over the carrying amount of the loans, referred to as the “accretable yield,” is accreted into interest income over the life of the loans.

Our primary business segments are banking and other financial services, and as outlined above, the banking segment’s primary business is lending. That activity entails potential loan losses, the magnitude of which depends on a variety of economic factors affecting borrowers which are beyond our control. While we have instituted underwriting guidelines and policies and credit review procedures to protect us from avoidable credit losses, some losses will inevitably occur.

Non-performing assets include non-accrual loans, loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing ~~other real estate owned (“REO”)~~ and foreclosed assets. Non-performing assets totaled ~~$3.7~~$1.9 million as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, compared to ~~$2.5~~$6.0 million as of December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. As of June 30, 2020, non-performing assets consisted of SBA non-accrual loans totaling $1.7 million, of which $1.1 million was guaranteed by the SBA, and commercial real estate non-accrual loans totaling $163,000. As of December 31, 2019, non-performing assets consisted of SBA non-accrual loans totaling ~~$3.5~~$5.9 million, of which ~~$2.8~~$4.9 million was guaranteed by the SBA, and ~~one~~ commercial and industrial ~~loan totaling $225,000. As of December 31, 2018, non-performing assets consisted solely of SBA~~ non-accrual loans totaling ~~$2.5 million, of which $2.3 million was guaranteed by the SBA.~~$60,000. There were no foreclosed assets ~~or REO~~ as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

Loans are considered past due when principal and interest payments have not been received as of the date such payments are contractually due. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when management has concerns relating to the ability to collect the loan interest and generally when such loans are 90 days or more past due. A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that not all principal and interest amounts will be collected according to the original loan contract. ~~There were no loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest as of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.~~

Foreclosed assets represent property acquired as the result of borrower defaults on loans. Foreclosed assets are recorded at estimated fair value, less estimated selling costs, at the time of foreclosure. Write-downs occurring at foreclosure are charged against the allowance for possible loan losses. On an ongoing basis, properties are appraised as required by market indications and applicable regulations. Write-downs are provided for subsequent declines in value and are included in other non-interest expense along with other expenses related to maintaining the properties.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding non-performing assets and restructured loans by type, including ratios of such loans to total assets as of the dates indicated:

	June 30, 2019					December 31, 2018					June 30, 2020					December 31, 2019
(In thousands, except percentages)	Amount		Loan Category to Total Assets			Amount		Loan Category to Total Assets			Amount		Loan Category to Total Assets			Amount		Loan Category to Total Assets
Non-accrual loans:
Commercial and industrial	$	225		0.07	%	$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%	$	60		0.02	%
SBA		3,480		1.04			2,545		0.83
Real estate – commercial												163		0.03			-		-
SBA guaranteed												1,118		0.21			4,892		1.34
SBA unguaranteed												575		0.11			1,039		0.28
Total non-accrual loans	$	3,705		1.10	%	$	2,545		0.83	%		1,856		0.35			5,991		1.64
Loans past due 90 days and accruing		-		-			-		-			-		-			-		-
Foreclosed assets		-		-			-		-			-		-			-		-
Total non-performing assets	$	3,705		1.10	%	$	2,545		0.83	%	$	1,856		0.35	%	$	5,991		1.64	%
Restructured loans on non-accrual	$	-		-		$	-		-		$	-		-	%	$	-		-	%

Restructured loans are considered “troubled debt restructurings” if, due to the borrower’s financial difficulties, we have granted a concession that we would not otherwise consider. This may include a transfer of real estate or other assets from the borrower, a modification of loan terms, or a combination of the two. Modifications of terms that could potentially qualify as a troubled debt restructuring include reduction of contractual interest rate, extension of the maturity date at a contractual interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk, or a reduction of the face amount of debt, either forgiveness of principal or accrued interest. As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, we had no loans considered to be a troubled debt restructuring.

As noted in Note 4, "Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses," Section 4013 of the CARES Act provides financial institutions the option to suspend TDR accounting under GAAP in certain circumstances and the Company has elected that option. The Company has worked proactively with customers experiencing financial challenges from the COVID-19 pandemic. As of June 30, 2020, the Company had granted principal and interest payment deferrals related to COVID-19 to 139 borrowers representing approximately $92.8 million of its outstanding loans. As of July 31, 2020, the number of modifications decreased to 12 loans with a total outstanding balance of $13.6 million. All loans remain accruing.

The allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) is a valuation allowance for credit losses in the loan portfolio. Management has adopted a methodology to properly analyze and determine an adequate loan loss allowance, which includes allowance allocations calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 310, Receivables, and allowance allocations calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 450, Contingencies. The analysis is based on sound, reliable and well documented information and is designed to support an allowance that is adequate to absorb all estimated incurred losses in our loan portfolio.

In estimating the specific and general exposure to loss on impaired loans, we have considered a number of factors, including the borrower’s character, overall financial condition, resources and payment record, the prospects for support from any financially responsible guarantors, and the realizable value of any collateral.

We also consider other internal and external factors when determining the allowance for loan losses, which include, but are not limited to, changes in national and local economic conditions, loan portfolio concentrations, and trends in the loan portfolio.

~~Senior management~~ Given the level of economic disruption and uncertainty within the State of Texas and the ~~Directors’ Loan Committee review this calculation~~nation as a whole, arising from the COVID-19 pandemic and volatility, the ~~underlying assumptions on a routine basis not less frequently than quarterly.~~

~~Under accounting standards for business combinations, acquired loans are recorded at fair value with no credit loss allowance on~~Company qualitatively adjusted the ~~date of acquisition. A provision for credit losses is recorded in periods after the date of acquisition~~analysis for the ~~emergence of new probable and estimable losses on acquired non-credit impaired loans. As of June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had no acquired loans requiring an allowance for loan loss.~~

~~The entire loan portfolio acquired in the acquisition of TBI on May 15, 2017 was initially recorded at fair value with no carryover of the related allowance for credit losses. The~~ allowance for loan losses ~~represents the calculated reserve~~ for ~~new loans originated since the acquisition. The allowance for loan losses totaled $1.1 million~~these and $874,000, at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, based upon measured loan portfolio balances of $156.4 million and $121.2 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company had charge-offs of $266,000 and recoveries of $16,000. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Company had charge-offs of $77,000, and recoveries of $13,000. The total reserve percentage of loans originated post-Tectonic Merger decreased to 0.71% at June 30, 2019, from 0.72% at December 31, 2018. The loans acquiredother risk factors as discussed in the ~~acquisition~~section captioned “COVID-19 Update” in ~~May 2017 were discounted to fair value. The discount balance is compared to a calculated allowance for those loans,~~Part I, Item 2, of this Form 10-Q, and ~~as long as the discount is higher, no allowance for loan loss is recognized. There was no allowance for loan loss recognized as~~in Part II, Item 1.A. “Risk Factors” of ~~June 30,~~this Form 10-Q and in our 2019 ~~and 2018 for the loans acquired.~~

Form 10-K. Based on an analysis performed by management at June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the allowance for loan losses is believed to be adequate to cover estimated loan losses in the portfolio as of that date based on the loan loss methodology employed by management. However, management’s judgment is based upon a number of assumptions about future events, which are believed to be reasonable, but which may or may not prove valid. Thus, charge-offs in future periods may exceed the allowance for loan losses or significant additional increases in the allowance for loan losses may be required.

Senior management and the Directors’ Loan Committee review this calculation and the underlying assumptions on a routine basis not less frequently than quarterly.

The allowance for loan losses totaled $2.5 million and $1.4 million, as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company had net charge-offs of $148,000 and $123,000, respectively.

The table below presents a summary of the Company’s net loan loss experience and provisions to the ALLL for the period indicated:

The following table sets forth the allocation of the allowance as of the date indicated and the percentage of allocated possible loan losses in each category to total gross loans as of the date indicated:

(In thousands, except percentages)	June 30, 2019					December 31, 2018					June 30, 2020					December 31, 2019
Allocated:	Amount		Loan Category to Gross Loans			Amount		Loan Category to Gross Loans			Amount		Loan Category to Gross Loans			Amount		Loan Category to Gross Loans
Commercial and industrial	$	464		41.9	%	$	419		37.9	%	$	1,099		21.9	%	$	501		29.4	%
Consumer installment		26		2.3			27		1.5			90		1.4			27		1.2
Real estate – residential		28		2.5			27		3.2			58		1.3			22		1.8
Real estate – commercial		268		24.3			210		15.0			687		12.7			347		16.1
Real estate – construction and land		54		4.9			34		2.0			179		2.6			76		2.7
SBA		267		24.1			157		39.0			435		59.9			435		48.0
USDA		-		-			-		1.4			-		0.2			-		0.8
Other		-		-			-		-			-		-			-		-
Total allowance for loan losses	$	1,107		100.0	%	$	874		100.0	%	$	2,548		100.0	%	$	1,408		100.0	%

Deposits, loan and investment security repayments and prepayments, proceeds from the sale of securities, and cash flows generated from operations are the primary sources of our funds for lending, investing, and other general purposes. Loan repayments are generally a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows tend to fluctuate with prevailing interests rates, markets and economic conditions, and competition.

Deposits are attracted principally from our primary geographic market area with the exception of time deposits, which, due to the Company’s attractive rates, are attracted from across the nation. The Company offers a broad selection of deposit products, including demand deposit accounts, NOW accounts, money market accounts, regular savings accounts, term certificates of deposit and retirement savings plans (such as IRAs). Deposit account terms vary, with the primary differences being the minimum balance required, the time period the funds must remain on deposit, and the associated interest rates. Management sets the deposit interest rates periodically based on a review of deposit flows and a survey of rates among competitors and other financial institutions. The Company relies primarily on customer service and long-standing relationships with customers to attract and retain deposits; however, market interest rates and rates offered by competing financial institutions significantly affect the Company’s ability to attract and retain deposits.

~~The following table illustrates the change in our~~Total deposits ~~between periods:~~

June 30, 2020, as compared to $283.6 million as of December 31, 2019. The following table sets forth our average deposit account balances, the percentage of each type of deposit to total deposits, and average cost of funds for each category of deposits for the periods indicated:

	For the six months ended June 30																For the six months ended June 30,
	2019								2018								2020								2019
(In thousands, except percentages)	Average Balance		Percent of Deposits			Average Rate			Average Balance		Percent of Deposits			Average Rate			Average Balance		Percent of Deposits			Average Rate			Average Balance		Percent of Deposits			Average Rate
Non-interest-bearing deposits	$	36,451		14.5	%		0.00	%	$	31,915		14.5	%		0.00	%	$	45,034		12.8	%		0.00	%	$	36,451		14.5	%		0.00	%
NOW accounts		3,107		1.2			0.24			3,472		1.6			0.28
Savings and interest-bearing demand																		9,646		2.7			0.37			7,335		2.9			0.38
Money market accounts		58,692		23.4			1.49			49,568		22.5			0.97			82,456		23.4			0.72			58,692		23.4			1.49
Savings accounts		4,228		1.7			0.49			5,198		2.4			0.50
Time deposits $100,000 and over		142,782		56.9			2.59			125,772		57.2			1.66
Time deposits under $100,000		5,568		2.2			2.21			3,954		1.8			1.26
Time deposits																		215,018		61.1			2.01			148,350		59.2			2.58
Total deposits	$	250,828		100.00	%		1.88	%	$	219,879		100.00	%		1.21	%	$	352,154		100.00	%		1.41	%	$	250,828		100.00	%		1.88	%

~~The Company’s FHLB borrowed funds totaled $10.0 million and $5.0 million as~~As of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, borrowings totaled $45.9 million and $24.0 million, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2020, the Company borrowed $33.9 million in connection with the FRB PPPLF program.

The table below presents balances of each of the borrowing facilities as of the dates indicated:

The Company has a credit line with the FHLB with borrowing capacity of ~~$32.7~~$38.5 million secured by commercial ~~loans and securities with collateral values of $23.3 million and $9.4 million, respectively.~~loans. The Company determines its borrowing needs and renews the advances accordingly at varying terms. AsThe Company had no borrowings with FHLB as of June 30, 2020. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had an overnight advance of ~~$5.0~~$2.0 million with an interest rate of ~~2.68%, which was paid off on July 12, 2019. In addition, the Company had~~1.45% and a ~~two month fixed term advance with an interest rate of 2.54% and maturity date of July 25, 2019, which was renewed into a~~$10.0 million six month fixed term advance with an interest rate of ~~2.20%~~2.18% and maturity date of January ~~25,~~27, 2020. At maturity, the term advance was rolled into the overnight advance and subsequently paid off.

The Company also has a credit line with the FRB with borrowing capacity of ~~$18.2~~$30.3 million, which is secured by commercial loans. There were no outstanding borrowings against the FRB line of credit as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

~~As of December 31, 2018,~~In connection with the FRB PPPLF program, the Company ~~had a $1.9~~has $98.3 million ~~bank stock loan with a variable~~of PPP loans available to be pledged, of which $33.9 million was pledged and borrowed as of June 30, 2020, at an interest rate of ~~prime plus 0.75% and maturity date of May 11, 2028. The loan was paid in full on May 31, 2019.~~0.35%.

Shareholders’ equity increased ~~$18.5~~$3.9 million, or 7.6%, to ~~$56.0~~$54.3 million as of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, from ~~$37.5~~$50.5 million as of December 31, ~~2018, after adjusting for the Tectonic Merger.~~2019. The ~~Tectonic Merger has been accounted for as a combination~~increase included net income of ~~businesses under common control in accordance with Topic 805~~. Under Topic 805, all the assets and liabilities of Tectonic Holdings are carried over to the books of the Company at their then current carrying amounts, and the consolidated financial statements have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the Tectonic Merger for all periods subsequent to the date at which the entities were under common control, May 15, 2017.

As of December 31, 2018, the Tectonic Merger had the effect of increasing retained earnings and additional paid in capital by a total of $811,000, while increasing Series A preferred stock by approximately $8.0$4.5 million, attributable to preferred stock outstanding at Tectonic Holdings at the time of the Tectonic Merger. The majority of the increase in shareholders’ equity of $18.5 million is attributable to the issuance of 1,725,000 shares of Series B preferred stock in our initial public offering, which raised $15.5 million, net of issuance costs, including underwriting discounts and offering expenses. The balance is related to dividends paid on the Series A preferred stock of $405,000, regular distributions made by Tectonic Holdings to its limited liability company members prior to the merger date of $1.3 million, a $265,000$71,000 net after-tax increase in other comprehensive income related to the market value of the securities available for sale, and ~~a $58,000 increase in additional paid-in capital~~$45,000 related to stock compensation ~~expense, and net income~~expense. Use of ~~$4.4 million for~~capital included $766,000 of dividends paid on the ~~six months ended June 30, 2019.~~Series B preferred stock.

Together with the Bank, the Company is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Bank’s and, accordingly, the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Bank qualified as "well capitalized" under the prompt corrective action regulations of Basel III and the OCC.

Quantitative measures established by regulations to ensure capital adequacy require the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations), common equity Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets, and of Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to average assets (as defined in the regulations).

The following table presents our regulatory capital ratios, as well as those of the Bank, as of the dates indicated:

(In thousands)	June 30, 2019					December 31, 2018
(In thousands, except percentages)											June 30, 2020					December 31, 2019
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Tectonic Financial, Inc.
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	43,812		14.58	%	$	27,193		9.40	%	$	42,200		9.01	%	$	38,301		11.20	%
Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk Weighted Assets)		20,272		8.29			19,159		8.47			24,950		9.50			21,051		8.20
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		43,812		17.93			27,193		12.02			42,200		16.07			38,301		14.92
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		44,919		18.38			28,067		12.41			44,748		17.04			39,709		15.47

T Bank, N.A.
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)	$	36,098		11.80	%	$	29,242		10.32	%	$	42,084		9.09	%	$	38,541		11.09	%
Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk Weighted Assets)		36,098		14.96			29,242		13.06			42,084		16.17			38,541		15.16
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		36,098		14.96			29,242		13.06			42,084		16.17			38,541		15.16
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)		37,205		15.42			30,116		13.45			44,632		17.15			39,949		15.71

Sanders Morris is regulated by FINRA, which, among other requirements, imposes minimums on its net regulatory capital. As of June 30, 2020, Sanders Morris is in compliance with its net regulatory capital requirement.

Our liquidity relates to our ability to maintain a steady flow of funds to support our ongoing operating, investing and financing activities. Our board of directors establishes policies and analyzes and manages liquidity to ensure that adequate funds are available to meet normal operating requirements in addition to unexpected customer demands for funds, such as high levels of deposit withdrawals or loan demand, in a timely and cost-effective manner. The most important factor in the preservation of liquidity is maintaining public confidence that facilitates the retention and growth of a large, stable supply of core deposits and funds. Ultimately, public confidence is generated through profitable operations, sound credit quality and a strong capital position. Liquidity management is viewed from a long-term and a short-term perspective as well as from an asset and liability perspective. We monitor liquidity through a regular review of loan and deposit maturities and forecasts, incorporating this information into a detailed projected cash flow model.

The Bank’s liquidity is monitored by its management, the Asset-Liability Committee and its board of directors who review historical funding requirements, current liquidity position, sources and stability of funding, marketability of assets, options for attracting additional funds, and anticipated future funding needs, including the level of unfunded commitments.

The Company’s primary sources of funds are retail, small business, custodial, wholesale commercial deposits, loan repayments, maturity of investment securities, other short-term borrowings, and other funds provided by operations. While scheduled loan repayments and maturing investments are relatively predictable, deposit flows and loan prepayments are more influenced by interest rates, general economic conditions, and competition. The Company will maintain investments in liquid assets based upon management’s assessment of (1) the need for funds, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on short-term liquid assets, and (4) objectives of the asset/liability management program.

~~The Company had cash and cash equivalents of $19.5 million, or 5.8% of total assets, as~~As of June 30, ~~2019. In addition to the on balance sheet liquidity available,~~2020, the Company had approximately $75.0 million held in an interest-bearing account at the Federal Reserve. The Company has ~~lines~~the ability to borrow funds as members of ~~credit with~~ the FHLB and the ~~FRB, which provide the Company with a source of off-balance sheet liquidity.~~FRB. As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Company’s ~~established credit line~~borrowing capacity with the FHLB was ~~$32.7~~$38.5 million ~~or 9.7% of assets,~~based upon loan collateral pledged to the FHLB, of which ~~$10.0 million~~none was utilized. In addition, the Company had $12.2 million of unpledged securities that could be pledged to the FHLB as collateral to increase the borrowing capacity. The ~~established credit line~~borrowing capacity with the FRB was ~~$18.2~~$30.3 million, ~~or 5.4% of assets,~~ of which none was utilized ~~or outstanding~~ as of June 30, ~~2019. The Company’s trust operations serve in a fiduciary capacity~~2020. In addition, the Company has approximately $70.6 million of SBA guaranteed loans held for ~~approximately $1.3 billion in total market value~~investment that could be sold to investors. In connection with the FRB PPPLF program, the Company has $64.4 million of assets as of June 30, 2019. Some of these custody assets are invested in cash. This cash is maintained either in a third party money market mutual fund (invested predominately in U.S. Treasury securities and other high grade investments) or in a Bank money market account. Only cashPPP loans available which ~~is fully insured by the FDIC is maintained at the Bank. This cash~~ can be ~~moved readily between the Bank and the third party money market mutual fund. As~~pledged for additional borrowing capacity.

We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the accompanying balance sheets. Our exposure to credit loss in the event of non-performance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. We follow the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for on-balance sheet instruments.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by us to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers.

As of June 30, ~~2019,~~2020, we had commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit of approximately ~~$23.5~~$27.3 million and ~~$162,000,~~$172,000, respectively.

As a financial institution, our primary component of market risk is interest rate volatility. Our asset liability management policy provides management with guidelines for effective funds management and we have established a measurement system for monitoring the net interest rate sensitivity position.

Fluctuations in interest rates will ultimately impact both the level of income and expense recorded on most of our assets and liabilities, and the market value of all interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, other than those which have a short term to maturity. Interest rate risk is the potential of economic losses due to future interest rate changes. These economic losses can be reflected as a loss of future net interest income and/or a loss of current fair market values. The objective is to measure the effect on net interest income and to adjust the balance sheet to minimize the inherent risk while at the same time maximizing income.

We manage exposure to interest rates by structuring the balance sheet in the ordinary course of business. We use no off-balance-sheet financial instruments to manage interest rate risk.

Our exposure to interest rate risk is managed by the Bank’s Asset Liability Committee in accordance with policies approved by the Bank’s board of directors. The committee formulates strategies based on appropriate levels of interest rate risk. In determining the appropriate level of interest rate risk, the committee considers the impact on earnings and capital of the current outlook on interest rates, potential changes in interest rates, liquidity, business strategies and other factors.

The committee meets regularly to review, among other things, the sensitivity of assets and liabilities to interest rate changes, the book and market values of assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses, purchase and sale activities, commitments to originate loans and the maturities of investments and borrowings. Additionally, the committee reviews liquidity, cash flow flexibility, maturities of deposits and consumer and commercial deposit activity. We employ methodologies to manage interest rate risk which include an analysis of relationships between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and an interest rate shock simulation model.

We use interest rate risk simulation models and shock analysis to test the interest rate sensitivity of net interest income and fair value of equity, and the impact of changes in interest rates on other financial metrics. The assumptions used are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure future net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from the model’s simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and the application and timing of various management strategies.

On a semi-annual basis, we run various stress tests to measure the impact on net interest income and fair value of equity from changes in market interest rates under various scenarios. Under the static model, rates are shocked instantaneously and ramped rates change over a twelve-month and twenty-four month horizon based upon parallel yield curve shifts. Parallel shock scenarios assume instantaneous parallel movements in the yield curve compared to a flat yield curve scenario. Additionally, we run non-parallel simulation involving analysis of interest income and expense under various changes in the shape of the yield curve.

The following table summarizes the impact of an instantaneous, sustained simulated change in net interest income ~~and fair value of equity~~ over a 12-month horizon as of ~~the date indicated:~~June 30, 2020:

~~We consider the likelihood of a decrease in interest rates beyond 100 basis points after June 30, 2019 as reasonably unlikely given current interest rate levels.~~

We have found that, historically, interest rates on deposits change more slowly than changes in the discount and federal funds rates. This assumption is incorporated into the simulation model and is generally not fully reflected in a gap analysis, meaning that process by which we measure the gap between interest rate sensitive assets verses interest rate sensitive liabilities. The assumptions incorporated into the model are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure future net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from the model’s simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and the application and timing of various strategies.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company has participated in the PPP loan program under the CARES Act. The Company originated $98.3 million of PPP loans during the three months ended June 30, 2020. In addition, total deposits increased by $75.9 million and borrowings increased by $33.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020. This has increased the Company’s deposit at the Federal Reserve by $8.8 million from $66.2 million at March 31, 2020 to $75.0 million at June 30, 2020. For the Company’s gap analysis, the PPP loans fell into the 3-12 months and 1-3 year time periods due to maturities and prepayment factors applied to PPP loans. The outflow of PPP funds from the Bank has been partially offset by inflows of non-interest-bearing deposits. This has caused an uneven shift in the sensitivity of the repricing gap between short-term assets and liabilities. Although PPP loans have maturities of two years, a large percentage of these loans are anticipated to receive SBA forgiveness and be repaid in advance of stated maturities. The Company believes the repricing gap would have been more in line with historical experiences had it not been for the funding of the PPP loans. The Company feels that funding these loans was both beneficial and necessary for our customers in light of the current economic environment and believes the one-year repricing gap increase is temporary in nature.

Our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this prospectus have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. These require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars, without considering changes in the relative value of money over time due to inflation or recession. Inflation generally increases the costs of funds and operating overhead, and to the extent loans and other assets bear variable rates, the yields on such assets. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all of the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant effect on the performance of a financial institution than the effects of general levels of inflation. In addition, inflation affects a financial institution’s cost of goods and services purchased, the cost of salaries and benefits, occupancy expense and similar items. Inflation and related increases in interest rates generally decrease the market value of investments and loans held and may adversely affect liquidity, earnings and shareholders’ equity.

As of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, an evaluation was performed by the Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply judgment in evaluating its controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective at the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q.

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 that has materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

We are involved, from time to time, as plaintiff or defendant in various legal actions arising in the normal course of its business. Based on the information presently available, management believes that the ultimate outcome in such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the business’s financial condition or results of operations of the Company on a consolidated basis.

~~There have been no~~The following represents a material ~~changes~~change in the Company’s risk factors from those disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. Additional risks not presently known to us, or that we currently deem immaterial, may also adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Further, to the extent that any of the information contained in this Form 10-Q constitutes forward-looking statements, the risk factors ~~disclosed~~set forth below also are cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of us.

The COVID-19 pandemic is adversely affecting the Company and its customers, counterparties, employees, and third-party service providers, and the continued adverse impacts on its business, financial position, results of operations, and prospects could be significant.

The spread of COVID-19 has created a global public-health crisis that has resulted in widespread volatility and deteriorations in household, business, economic, and market conditions. The extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s capital, liquidity, and other financial positions and on its business, results of operations, and prospects will depend on a number of evolving factors, including:

We are unable to estimate the impact of COVID-19 on the Company’s business and operations at this time. The COVID-19 pandemic could cause the Company to experience higher credit losses in our lending portfolio, impairment of our goodwill and other financial assets, further reduced demand for its products and services, and other negative impacts on its financial position, results of operations, and prospects. Sustained adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic may also prevent the Company from satisfying our minimum regulatory capital ratios and other supervisory requirements, failing to be able to sustain the paying of dividends to its shareholders, or result in downgrades in its credit ratings.

The increased reliance on technology by the Company, its employees and third party vendors during the COVID-19 pandemic may adversely affect its operations.

Current and future restrictions on the Company’s workforce’s access to its facilities could limit its ability to meet customer servicing expectations and have a material adverse effect on its operations. The Company relies on business processes and branch activity that largely depend on people, technology, and the use of complex systems and models to manage its business, including access to information technology systems and models as well as information, applications, payment systems and other services provided by third parties. In response to COVID-19, the Company has modified its business practices and granted access to its employees to work remotely from their homes in order to have the Company’s operations uninterrupted as much as possible. Further, technology in employees’ homes may not be as robust as in the Company’s offices and could cause the networks, information systems, applications, and other tools available to employees to be more limited or less reliable than in its ~~IPO Prospectus filed~~offices, the continuation of these work-from-home measures introduces additional operational risk, especially including increased cybersecurity risk. These cyber risks include greater phishing, malware, and other cybersecurity attacks, vulnerability to disruptions of the Company’s information technology infrastructure and telecommunications systems for remote operations, increased risk of unauthorized dissemination of confidential information, limited ability to restore the systems in the event of a systems failure or interruption, great risk of a security breach resulting in destruction or misuse of valuable information, and potential impairment of its ability to perform critical functions, including wiring funds, all of which could expose the Company to risks of data or financial loss, litigation and liability and could seriously disrupt its operations and the operations of any impacted customers.

Moreover, the Company relies on many third parties in its business operations, including the appraiser of the real property collateral, vendors that supply essential services such as loan servicers, providers of financial information, systems and analytical tools and providers of electronic payment and settlement systems, and local and federal government agencies, offices, and courthouses. In light of the developing measures responding to the pandemic, many of these entities may limit the availability and access of their services. For example, loan origination could be delayed due to the limited availability of real estate appraisers for the collateral. Loan closings could be delayed related to reductions in available staff in recording offices or the closing of courthouses in certain counties, which slows the process for title work, mortgage and Uniform Commercial Code filings in those counties. If the third-party service providers continue to have limited capacities for a prolonged period or if additional limitations or potential disruptions in these services materialize, it may negatively affect the Company’s operations.

Changes in market interest rates or capital markets, including volatility resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, could affect our revenues and expenses, the value of assets and obligations, and the availability and cost of capital or liquidity.

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected the financial markets and has resulted in a number of Federal Reserve actions. Market interest rates have declined significantly. On March 3, 2020, the 10-year Treasury yield fell below 1.00% for the first time, and the Federal Reserve reduced the target federal funds rate by 50 basis points to 1.00% to 1.25%. On March 15, 2020, the Federal Reserve further reduced the target federal funds rate by 100 basis points to 0.00% to 0.25% and announced a $700 billion quantitative easing program in response to the expected economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Federal Reserve reduced the interest that it pays on excess reserves from 1.60% to 1.10% on March 3, 2020, and then to 0.10% on March 15, 2020. We expect that these reductions in interest rates, especially if prolonged, could adversely affect our net interest income and margins and our profitability.

Given our business mix, and the fact that most of our assets and liabilities are financial in nature, we tend to be sensitive to market interest rate movements and the performance of the financial markets. Our primary source of income is net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income generated by our interest-earning assets (consisting primarily of loans and, to a lesser extent, securities) and the interest expense generated by our interest-bearing liabilities. Prevailing economic conditions, fiscal and monetary policies and the policies of various regulatory agencies all affect market rates of interest and the availability and cost of credit, which, in turn, significantly affect financial institutions’ net interest income. If the interest we pay on deposits and other borrowings increases at a faster rate than increases in the interest we receive on loans and investments, net interest income, and, therefore, our earnings, could be affected. Earnings could also be affected if the interest we receive on loans and other investments falls more quickly than the interest we pay on deposits and other borrowings.

In addition to the general impact of the economy, changes in interest rates or in valuations in the debt or equity markets could directly impact us in one or more of the following ways:

• the yield on earning assets and rates paid on interest bearing liabilities may change in disproportionate ways;

• the value of certain balance sheet and off-balance sheet financial instruments or the value of equity investments that we hold could decline;

• the demand for loans and refinancings may decline, which could negatively impact income related to loan originations; or

• to the extent we access capital markets to raise funds to support our business, such changes could affect the cost of such funds or the ability to raise such funds.

Declining values of real estate, increases in unemployment, and the related effects on local economies, including impacts related to the COVID-19 pandemic, may increase our credit losses, which would negatively affect our financial results.

We offer a variety of secured loans, including commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, home equity, consumer installment and other loans. Many of our loans are secured by real estate (both residential and commercial) within our market area. A major change in the real estate market, such as deterioration in the value of collateral, or in the local or national economy, could affect our customers’ ability to pay these loans, resulting in loan defaults and the possible impairments in the value of our collateral, which in turn could impact our results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, increases in unemployment also may affect the ability of certain clients to repay loans and the financial results of commercial clients in localities with higher unemployment, may result in loan defaults and foreclosures and may impair the ~~SEC~~value of our collateral. We cannot fully eliminate credit risk, and as a result, credit losses may increase in the future. The extent of such impact cannot be determined at this time and may be muted by the Bank’s implementation of hardship relief programs that include payment deferral and short-term funding options.

The Bank’s participation in the PPP may result in operational, credit or other shortfalls that may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, President Trump signed into law the CARES Act on March 27, 2020. Among other things, the CARES Act created a new facility, titled the “Paycheck Protection Program,” to the SBA’s 7(a) Loan Program. The small business loans are provided through participating financial institutions, such as the Bank, that process loan applications and service the loans. During the three months ended June 30, 2020, we funded 922 loans totaling $98.3 million in of PPP loans. Due to the accelerated implementation of the PPP, the Bank, like other financial institutions, has funded loans under the PPP as the SBA and U.S. Department of Treasury release guidance, nearly daily, on the operational and logistical functions of the program. There are several aspects of the PPP that have not yet been addressed by the SBA or U.S. Department of Treasury, including how forgiveness on loans under the program will be calculated. We cannot predict what operational, credit, or other shortfalls may arise as a result of the Bank making loans under the PPP or how such shortfalls may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and future prospects. Moreover, every PPP borrower is in a challenging financial position that may negatively impact their ability to repay if the loans are not subject to forgiveness. The borrowers may not be able to repay the loans when the COVID-19 pandemic subsides and they may not maintain the level of employees and salary levels required for forgiveness. If the borrowers are unable to repay their loans or the federal government does not pay timely the amounts that it would owe the Bank pursuant to ~~Rule 424(b)~~the terms of the ~~Securities Act on May 13, 2019.~~loans, the guarantees and the PPP, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

~~On May 14, 2019, subsequent to~~None during the period covered by this Form 10-Q, we sold 1,500,000 shares of our Series B preferred stock in our initial public offering, and on May 29, 2019, we sold 225,000 shares of our Series B preferred stock pursuant to the underwriters’ full exercise of their option to purchase additional shares, at a public offering price of $10.00 per share, for aggregate estimated net proceeds of approximately $15.5million. All of the shares issued and sold in the initial public offering were registered under the Securities Act pursuant to our IPO Registration Statement, which was originally filed with the SEC on April 18, 2019 and declared effective by the SEC on May 10, 2019. Except for commissions paid to Sanders Morris as a joint book-running manager, we made no payments to our directors, officers or persons owning ten percent or more of our common stock or to their associates, or to our affiliates in connection with the issuance and sale of the securities registered. Sandler O’Neill + Partners, L.P. acted as the lead book-running manager, Sanders Morris acted as joint book-running manager and American Capital Partners acted as co-manager.

There has been no material change in the planned use of proceeds from our initial public offering as described in our IPO Prospectus, filed with the SEC on May 13, 2019. During the period from the completion of the offering on May 14, 2019 through July 16, 2019, we paid off the bank stock loan totaling $1.9 million, used approximately $8.0 million to repurchase in full our outstanding shares of Series A preferred stock, and contributed $4.0 million to the Bank to support its capital position, to finance potential strategic acquisitions to the extent such opportunities arise and for other general corporate purposes, which could include other growth initiatives. quarter ended June 30, 2020.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Series B preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share	TECTP	The Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		Page

Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019	3
	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019	4
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019	5
	Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019	6
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019	7
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	8
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3733
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	5854
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	5956

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		6057
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	6057
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	6057
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	6059
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	6059
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	6059
Item 5.	Other Information	60
Item 6.	Exhibits	6160

SIGNATURES		6261

	Unpaid		Recorded		Recorded
	Contractual		Investment		Investment		Total				Average		Interest
	Principal		With No		With		Recorded		Related		Recorded		Income
(In thousands)	Balance		Allowance		Allowance		Investment		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
June 30, 2019											Six Months Ended
Commercial and industrial	$	228	$	225	$	-	$	225	$	-	$	38	$	-
SBA		4,683		4,435		-		4,435				2,267		-
Total	$	4,911	$	4,660	$	-	$	4,660	$	-	$	2,305	$	-

December 31, 2018											Year Ended
SBA	$	3,003	$	2,545	$	-	$	2,545	$	-	$	2,371	$	-
Total	$	3,003	$	2,545	$	-	$	2,545	$	-	$	2,371	$	-

	Unpaid		Recorded		Recorded
	Contractual		Investment		Investment		Total				Average		Interest
	Principal		With No		With		Recorded		Related		Recorded		Income
(In thousands)	Balance		Allowance		Allowance		Investment		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
June 30, 2020											Six Months Ended
Commercial and industrial	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	20	$	-
SBA		6,666		3,050		-		3,050		-		3,406		61
Total	$	6,666	$	3,050	$	-	$	3,050	$	-	$	3,426	$	61

December 31, 2019											Year Ended
Commercial and industrial	$	70	$	60	$	-	$	60	$	-	$	62	$	-
SBA		6,523		5,931		-		5,931		-		4,091		287
Total	$	6,593	$	5,991	$	-	$	5,991	$	-	$	4,153	$	287

	Number of Shares Underlying Options		Weighted Average Exercise Prices		Weighted Average Contractual Life in Years		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at beginning of the year		190,000	$	5.37
Granted		-		-
Exercised		-		-
Expired/forfeited		-		-

Outstanding at end of period		190,000	$	5.37		7.9		(a)
Exercisable at end of period		-	$	-
Available for grant at end of period		560,000

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐

Non-accelerated filer	☒	Smaller reporting company	☒

		Emerging growth company	☒

	Available for Sale				Held to Maturity
(In thousands)	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value
Due after one year through five years	$	4,627	$	4,626	$	-	$	-
Due after five years through ten years		3,980		4,033		3,937		3,937
Due after ten years		338		339		3,537		3,537
Mortgage-backed securities		2,034		2,053		-		-
Total	$	10,979	$	11,051	$	7,474	$	7,474

(In thousands, except percentages)	June 30, 2020				December 31, 2019
Non-interest bearing demand	$	73,964	17	%	$	33,890	12	%
Interest-bearing demand (NOW)		4,887	1			4,546	1
Money market accounts		113,570	27			56,144	20
Savings accounts		5,363	1			4,669	2
Time deposits $100,000 and over		218,026	52			178,004	63
Time deposits under $100,000		6,964	2			6,348	2
Total	$	422,774	100	%	$	283,601	100	%

As of December 31, 2019
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Tectonic Financial, Inc. (consolidated)	$	39,709	15.47	%	$	26,950	10.50	%	$	25,667	10.00	%
T Bank, N.A.		39,949	15.71			26,699	10.50			25,428	10.00
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Tectonic Financial, Inc. (consolidated)		38,301	14.92			21,817	8.50			20,534	8.00
T Bank, N.A.		38,541	15.16			21,614	8.50			20,342	8.00
Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Tectonic Financial, Inc. (consolidated)		21,051	8.20			17,967	7.00			16,683	6.50
T Bank, N.A.		38,541	15.16			17,800	7.00			16,528	6.50
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
Tectonic Financial, Inc. (consolidated)		38,301	11.20			13,679	4.00			17,099	5.00
T Bank, N.A.		38,541	11.09			13,899	4.00			17,373	5.00

	●	Level 1 Inputs - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.
	●	Level 2 Inputs - Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means.
	●	Level 3 Inputs - Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

(In thousands)	Actual Nolan results of operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019		Actual for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019		Pro Forma for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018

Noninterest income	$	2,778	$	14,952	$	15,287
Noninterest expense		1,997		14,968		13,875
Net income		617		4, 386		5,326

(Dollars in thousands)	As of and for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2019			As of and for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018			As of and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2019			As of and for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Net income, as reported	$	2,192		$	1,912		$	4,386		$	5,439
Income available to common shareholders		1,988			1,711			3,981			5,037
Average tangible common equity		20,281			16,409			18,336			14,630
Return on average tangible common equity		39.21	%		41.71	%		43.42	%		68.86	%

	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2020 vs June 30, 2019
	Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in
(In thousands)	Rate			Average Volume		Total
Interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold	$	(134	)	$	61	$	(73	)
Securities		80			28		108
Loans, net of unearned discount ⁽¹⁾		(1,028	)		2,257		1,229
Total earning assets		(1,082	)		2,346		1,264

Savings and interest-bearing demand		-			4		4
Money market deposit accounts		(224	)		87		(137	)
Time deposits		(414	)		674		260
FHLB and other borrowings		(109	)		23		(86	)
Subordinated notes		(1	)		-		(1	)
Total interest-bearing liabilities		(748	)		788		40

Changes in net interest income	$	(334	)	$	1,558	$	1,224

	As of and for the Three Months Ended						As of and for the Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
(In thousands, except percentages)	2019			2018			2019			2018
Average loans outstanding	$	259,505		$	226,784		$	255,433		$	223,520
Gross loans outstanding at end of period(3)	$	254,137		$	214,310		$	254,137		$	214,310
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of period	$	939		$	563		$	874		$	386
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses		400			77			483			321
Charge offs:
Commercial and industrial		-			-			-			-
SBA 7(a)		248			-			266			77
Total charge-offs		248			-			266			77
Recoveries:
Commercial and industrial		-			-			-			-
SBA 7(a)		16			3			16			13
Total recoveries		16			3			16			13
Net charge-offs (recoveries)		232			(3	)		250			64
Allowance for loan losses at end of period	$	1,107		$	643		$	1,107		$	643
Ratio of allowance to end of period loan		0.44	%		0.30	%		0.44	%		0.30	%
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans		0.09	%		-	%		0.10	%		0.03	%

	As of June 30, 2019
Change in Interest Rates (basis points)	$ Change in Net Interest Income			% Change in Fair Value of Equity
	(Dollars in thousands)
+400	$	3,014		17.56	%
+300		2,274		12.61
+200		1,533		7.99
+100		792		3.82
Base
-100		(737	)	(3.53	)

Change in Interest Rates (basis points)	% Change in Net Interest Income
+200		18.73
+100		9.38
-100		(5.01	)
-200		(12.74	)

	•	The duration, extent, and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 does not yet appear to be contained and could affect significantly more households and businesses. The duration and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to be impossible to accurately predict.
	•	The response of governmental and nongovernmental authorities. The actions of many governmental and nongovernmental authorities have been directed toward curtailing household and business activity to contain COVID-19 while simultaneously deploying fiscal- and monetary-policy measures to partially mitigate the adverse effects on individual households and businesses. These actions are not always coordinated or consistent across jurisdictions but, in general, have been rapidly expanding in scope and intensity.

	•	The effect on the Company’s customers, counterparties, employees, and third-party service providers. COVID-19 and its associated consequences and uncertainties may affect individuals, households, and businesses differently and unevenly. In the near-term if not longer, however, the Company’s credit, operational, and other risks are generally expected to increase.
	•	The effect on economies and markets. Whether the actions of governmental and nongovernmental authorities will be successful in mitigating the adverse effects of COVID-19 is unclear. National, regional, and local economies and markets could suffer disruptions that are lasting. An economic slowdown could adversely affect the Company’s origination of new loans and the performance of its existing loans. In addition, governmental actions are meaningfully influencing the interest-rate environment, which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibit

~~2.1~~		Amended and Restated Agreement and Plan of Merger by and between T Acquisition, Inc. and Tectonic Holdings, LLC, dated March 28, 2019 (schedules have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. Tectonic Financial agrees to furnish supplementally to the SEC a copy of any omitted schedule upon request)(incorporated by reference from Exhibit 2.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on April 18, 2019)
3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Formation (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed with the SEC on May 9, 2019 (File No. 333-230949))
3.2		Certificate of Designation of 10.0% Series A Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 16, 2019 (File No. 001-38910))
3.3		Certificate of Designation of 9.00% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Series B Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 16, 2019 (File No. 001-38910))
3.4		Certificate of Amendment to effect Reverse Stock Split (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 16, 2019 (File No. 001-38910))
3.5		Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.5 to Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed with the SEC on May 6, 2019 (File No. 333-230949))
31.1		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer*
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer*
32.1		Section 1350 Certification**

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document*
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document*
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Calculation Linkbase Document*
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase*
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document*
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase*

	TECTONIC FINANCIAL, INC.

Date: August 14, ~~2019~~2020	By:	/s/ A. Haag Sherman

		A. Haag Sherman Chief Executive Officer/Principal Executive Officer

	By:	/s/ Ken Bramlage

		Ken Bramlage Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer/Principal Financial Officer